Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
051397 CC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE MAY 13, 1997- 7:00 PM 5:30 PM - Closed Session of the'City Council pursuant to Government Code Sections: 1. §54957.6, Conference with City's Labor Negotiator, Grant Yates. 2. §54956.8, Conference with Real Property negotiator, Property: 27600 Jefferson Avenue; Negotiating Parties: Norm Reeves Super Group and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula; Under negotiation: consideration: of lease terms. 3. §54956.9(a), Pending Litigation: a. Strachota Insurance Agency v. City of Temecula, et ai. b. Stratego v. City of Temecula, et al. c. Zonos v. City of Temecula, et al. 4. §54956.9(b), Whether to initiate litigation, one matter. At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM. CALL TO ORDER: Prelude Music: Invocation: Flag Salute: R:\Agenda~051397 Mayor Patricia H. Birdsall presiding Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 97-08 Resolution: No. 97-41 Kurt Jordan Pastor James Field, First Baptist Church of Temecula Mayor Pro Tern Roberts ROLL CALL: PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS PUBLIC COMMENTS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall National Transit Appreciation Day 2.1 2.2 R:\Agenda\051397 2 When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk befQre the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: Approve the minutes of April 8, 1997. Approve the minutes of April 22, 1997. 2 A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. 3 Resolution Aoproving List of Demands 4 6 RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A City Treasurer's Report as of March 31. 1997 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 1997. Authorize Access to Lot 28 in Tract No. 9833-1 from Margarita Road (Located on the Westerly side of Margarita Road Southerly of Pio Pico Road) RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Authorize driveway access to Lot 28 in Tract No. 9833-1 from Margarita Road by permitting an exception to the abutters access rights dedicated to and accepted by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors' approval of the final Tract Map; 5.2 Authorize the City Engineer to approve the specific location, subject to the preparation of an agreement wherein the applicants shall quitclaim their rights to access from Pio Pico Road. Agreement shall be satisfactory to the City Engineer and City Attorney prior to recordation of the agreement. Authorize Access to Parcel 1 in Parcel MaD No. 21451 from Santiago Road (Located on the Northerly side of Santiago Road Westerly of Margarita Road) RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve a new driveway location access opening fronting on Santiago Road Westerly of Margarita Road; 6.2 Authorize the City Engineer to approve the specific location, subject to the preparation of an agreement wherein the applicants shall quitclaim their rights in an offsite access opening, and shall agree to physically close their existing driveway. Agreement shall be satisfactory to the City Engineer and City Attorney prior to recordation of the agreement. R:~Agenda~051397 3 8 9 10 R:\Agenda~051397 Release Faithful Performance Warrantv. and Labor and Materials Bonds in Tract No. 20703- ~, (Located Easterly of the intersection of Roripaugh Road at Winchester Road) RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Authorize the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials Bonds for Street, Water and Sewer Improvements in Tract No. 20703-2; 7.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the developer and surety. Release Faithful Performance Warrantv and Labor and Material Bonds in Tract No. 20703-3 (Located Southeasterly of Winchester Road and Southwesterly of Nicolas Road) RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Authorize release of the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond Riders and Labor and Material Bonds for Public Improvements in Tract No. 20703-3; 8.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the developer and surety. Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 2!675-6 (Located Southwesterly of the Intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho Vista Road) RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 21675-6; 9.2 Authorize the initiation of the one-year warranty period, reduction of the Faithful Performance Street and drainage and Water and Sewer security amounts, and release of the Subdivision Monument security; 9.3 Accept substitute securities for Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials; 9.4 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Sureties. Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 21675-F (Located Southwesterly of the Intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho Vista Road) RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 21675-F; 10.2 Authorize the initiation of the one-year warranty period, reduction of the Faithful Performance Street, and Water and Sewer security amounts to warranty 'level, and release of the subdivision monument bond; 11 12 13 10.3 Accept substitute securities for Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials; 10.4 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Sureties. Release Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Material Bonds in Tract No. 22962 (Located Southeasterly of Winchester Road and Southwesterly of Nicolas Road) RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Authorize release of the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond riders and Labor and Material Bonds for Street, Drainage, Water, and Sewer Improvements in Tract No. 22962; 11.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the developer and surety. Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Public Improvement Securities in Tract No. 23 !42 (Located Northeasterly of the intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho California Road) RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Accept the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement, and Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Securities for Street, Drainage, Water and Sewer Improvements, and Subdivision Monumentation in Tract No. 23142; 12.2 Authorize the release of the faithful performance and labor and materials securities on file; 12.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Sureties. Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Public Improvement Bonds in Tract No. 23992 (Located Southerly of the intersection of Rancho California Road at Ynez Road) RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Accept the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement, and Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for Street and Drainage, Water and Sewer System improvements, and Subdivision Monumentation and Traffic Signalization Mitigation Bonds in Tract No. 23992; 13.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developers and Sureties. R:\Agenda\O51397 5 14 15 16 17 Acceptance of the Grant of a Drainage Easement over a Portion of Parcel I of Parcel MaD No. 22554, abutting Tract No. 20879-F (Located north of Rancho California Road and east of Meadows Parkway) RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING THE GRANT OF A STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 22554, ABUTTING TRACT NO. 20879-F Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tracts No. 21675-5 and 21675-F (Located westerly of the intersection of Rancho Vista Road at Meadows Parkway) RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM, (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 21675-6 AND 21675-F) Award of Construction Contract for the FY96-97 Street Striping Program, Project No. PW97-01 RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Award a contract for Project No. PW97-01, FY96-97 Street Striping Program, to Pacific Striping, Inc. for $76,685.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 16.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $7,668.50 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. Amendment to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Approve an Amendment to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement creating the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency. R:\Agenda\051397 6 18 Official Pageant Recognition RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Recognize the Temecula Valley Pageant Title Holders as Official Temecula Representatives of the City of Temecula, 19 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 97-05 RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(d) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE 'REGARDING THE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT ON {1} YNEZ ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD {2) DEL REY ROAD AND VIA NORTE (3) MORAGA ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA AND MARGARITA ROAD (4) MARGARITA ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH (5) JEFFERSON AVENUE BETWEEN WINCHESTER ROAD AND NORTH CITY LIMITS 20 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 97-06 RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AND THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO MAKE CHANGES TO TABLE 17.08(a) OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND TABLE 1 OF THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALLOW "FORTUNE TELLING, OR SIMILAR ACTIVITY" AS PERMITTED USES RATHER THAN CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES R:\Agenda\051397 7 21 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 97-07 RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97-07 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 9.14 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, PROHIBITING THE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND POSSESSION OF OPEN CONTAINERS OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN PUBLIC PLACES, AND SECTION 9.02.010, PROHIBITING ENGAGING IN CERTAIN BODILY FUNCTIONS IN CERTAIN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PLACES, AND AMENDING SECTION 12.04.210 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN CITY PARKS AND FACILITIES R:~Agenda~051397 8 JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL, TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, OLD TOWN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY AND THE OLD TOWN WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Temecula Redevelopment Agency - Chairperson Steven J. Ford Old Town Community Facilities District Financing Authority o Chairperson Karel F. Lindemans Old Town Westside Improvement Authority - Chairperson Karel F. Lindemans PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit written comments to the City Council/Redevelopment Agency/Financing or Improvement Authority before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project{s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or 'prior to, the public hearing. AB 1290 Redevelopment Implementation Plan Status RePort RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Receive and file Implementation Plan Status Report. 1.2 Take public testimony relative to the implementation of the Redevelopment and Implementation Plan. 1.3 Provide direction on related policy issues. AGENCY/AUTHORITY BUSINESS 'Old Town Temecula Entertainment Project, Termination of Owner Participation Agreement Fluor Daniel Construction Management Agreement, and Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District No. 1 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TERMINATING THAT CERTAIN "OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND' BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND T.Z.B.G., INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION," DATED AUGUST 31, 1995, AS AMENDED MARCH'25, 1996 R:',Agenaa~051397 9 2.2 That the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY TERMINATING THAT CERTAIN "CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISION AGREEMENT," DATED NOVEMBER 26, 1996 2.3 That the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. FA 97- AN ORDINANCE OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY DISSOLVING THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. I (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING , TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT MEETING, OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY MEETING AND THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY MEETING R:~Agenda\051397 10 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 97-01 Resolution: No. CSD 97-04 CALL TO ORDER: President deffrey E. Stone ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Board of Directors gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of April 22, 1997. 2 Authorization to Release a Formal Bid for the ADA Improvement Project RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Authorize the release of a formal public bid for the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Improvement Project. R:\Agenda\051397 11 3 Release and Reduction of Landscape Bonds - The Preslev Companies (Highway 79 South at Redhawk Parkway) RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Authorize the release of the Landscape Improvement Bonds for Tract Nos. 23267-2 and 23267-3 - The Presley Companies. 3.2 Authorize the reduction of the Landscape Improvement Bonds for Tract No. 26861 - The Pr.esley Companies. 3.3 Direct the Secretary/City Clerk to notify the Developer and the Surety. Award of Contract - TCSD Tree Trimming Services RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Award contract of $18,199 to Laan's Tree Service to provide tree trimming services for TCSD slope maintenance areas within the Mirada, and Villages tracts. 4.2 Approve appropriation of $9,190 to the Service Level 'C' Repair and Maintenance - Facilities Account No. 193-180-999-5212. PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit written comments to the Board of Directors before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. TCSD Proposed Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 1997-1998 RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING, SLOPE MAINTENANCE, RECYCLING AND REFUSE COLLECTION, AND STREET AND ROAD IMPROVEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997-1998 R:~A. genda~051397 12 RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ORDERING, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON JUNE 30, 1997 FOR PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN THE RANCHO HIGHLANDS DEVELOPMENT TO APPROVE AN INCREASE IN SERVICE LEVEL C RATES AND CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XlIID, SECTION 6 OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION 6.2 Approve the Election Notice, Ballot, and Procedures for the Completion, Return and Tabulation of the Ballots. 6.3 Authorize staff to mail the ballots to the affected property owners pursuant to the aforementioned process. DISTRICT BUSINESS 7 ADDeal of 1996-97 TCSD Rates and Charges. Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DENYING THE APPEAL BY REGENCY PROPERTIES OF FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 RATES AND CHARGES LEVIED AGAINST THE TEMECULA CREEK INN DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting: May 27, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. fl:~Agenda~0$1397 13 :!:'TEM~CULA i : iI Next in Order: Ordinance: No. RDA 97-01 Resolution: No. RDA 97-01 RECONVENE MEETING Chairperson Steven J. Ford presiding PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of April 22, 1997. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Drive, Temecula, California. May 27, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park R:~,A~enda\051397 14 OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY Next in Order: Resolution No.: FA 97-01 RECONVENE MEETING: Chairperson Karel F. Lindemans PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed on the agenda a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of April 22, 1997. ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: May 27, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:\Agenda\051397 15 OLD TOWN WESTSIDE IMPROVFMENT AUTHORITY CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Karel F. Lindemans Resolution: Next in Order: No. IA 97-01 PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. if you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed on the Agenda a pink "Request To Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of April 22, 1997. ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: May 27, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, R:\Agenda~,051397 16 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL BUSINESS 22 TCI Cable Presentation RECOMMENDATION: 22.1 Receive and file report. 23 Prima Facie Speed Limits on Certain Streets - Mira Loma Drive North of Rancho Vista Road, Cabrillo Avenue between Jedediah Smith Road and Vallejo Avenue RECOMMENDATION: 23.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(d) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FAClE SPEED LIMIT ON (1) MIRA LOMA DRIVE NORTH OF RANCHO VISTA ROAD (2) CABRILLO AVENUE BETWEEN JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND VALLEJO AVENUE 24 Proposed Reorganization of RCTC (Placed on the agenda at the request of Mayor Pro Tern Roberts) RECOMMENDATION: 24.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ENDORSING THE REORGANIZATION OF THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 25 Development Impact Fees RECOMMENDATION: 25.1 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 15 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER - ENTITLED "PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE" R:\Agenda\051397 17 25.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING AND IMPOSING A PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: May 27, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Next meeting: CIP Workshop, June 3, 1997, 6:30 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:\Agenda~051397 18 'PROCLAMATIONS/ PRESENTATIONS City of PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the Nation is celebrating N~tion~l T~y Tr~dt Week f~om ~2-16, 1997; ~d WHEREAS, Transit is a vital component of the fabric of society both nationally and in Temecula, California; and WHEREAS, Transit helps conserve energy, reduce pollution, and relieve congestion in Temecula, California; and WHEREAS, Transit provides mobility for ,dl, inchAi,,g the young, old, disabled and poor who depend upon it; and WHEREAS, The Riverside Transit Agency is providing safe, clean, efficient and effective service for the people of Temecula, California; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Patricia H. Birdsall, on behalf of the City Council of fhe City of Temecula, hereby procla;,~ May 14th, 1997 to be IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of fhe City of Temecula to be affixed this ][$fh day of May, ][997. Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor June S. Greek, C/~CkAAE, City Clerk ITEM 1 ITEM 2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD APRIL 8, 1997 EXECUTIVE SESSION A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:42 PM. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Ford, to adjourn to Executive Session at 5:42 PM, pursuant to Government Code Sections: It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Ford to add the following item to the agenda, based on subsequent need: §54956.9(b), Conference with Legal Counsel- anticipated Litigation, one matter. The motion was unanimously carried. 1. §54956.9(b), Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation, two matters. 2. §54956.8, Conference with Real Property Negotiator, Property: Approximately 4.5 acres located northeast of Margarita Road and Rustic Glen (Winchester Creek Park); Negotiating parties: Winchester LLC, Steve Bieri and City of Temecula; Under negotiation: Price and terms of acquisition. The motion was unanimously carried. The Executive Session was adjourned at 6:45 PM. A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:02 PM at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Mayor Birdsall presiding. PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson, and City Clerk June S; Greek. PRELUDE MUSIC The prelude and intermission music was provided by Jordan Bellino. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Minister Doug Cole, Church of Christ. Minutes\040897 -1- 05107/97 Citv Council Minutes Aoril 8. 1997 PLEDGE OF A! LEGlANCE The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilmember Stone. PROCLAMATION/PRFSENTATIONS Karl Hollis Spencer of United Way presented their Outstanding Region Award to the City of Temecula, and their Municipal Campaign Award to City staff for their outstanding campaign, which was coordinated by Allie Kuhns. Abe Lehman, president of the Temecula Valley Pop Warner League, presented Community Services Director Shawn Nelson a plaque of appreciation to the City of Temecula and the Community Services Department for their continued support of Pop Warner Football. Mayor Birdsall presented a Certificate of Appreciation to Steve Sander for his six years of service on the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, of which he was an inaugural member. Mayor Birdsall proclaimed April 13 to April 19, 1997 to be "Crime Victims' Rights Week". Mayor Birdsall presented a Commendation Award to Police Canine "Tango". Police Chief Pete Labahn introduced Officer Chuck Mungle, the first Officer to work with Tango, and Officer Joe Nardone, his present handler, and presented the Top Dog Award trophy, reflecting Tango's performance in a November 1996 competition, to the City of Temecula. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT City Attorney Thorson stated, in accordance with the provisions of the Brown Act, he had nothing to report from Closed Session. PUBLIC COMMENTS Tom Stultz, 32076 Corte Soledad, thanked the City Council for funding improvements to the Old Town area. Jim Miller, 31691 Corte Cardenas, verified the approval date for the Zonos Strip Mall at Pauba and Margarita Roads is April 22, 1997, and invited people to attend or to call Temecula's hotline. Philip Hoxey, 43318 Cielo de Azul, thanked the City Council for the preservation and restoration of the Old Town business district by approving the design and engineering of the Old Town Specific Plan. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Ford stated modifications regarding RCHCA were included in their packets. He would like input regarding reimbursement levels and asked the City Attorney to look at it for Minutes\040897 -2- 05/07/97 City Council Minutes Anril 8. 1997 ratification. He reported at the last meeting of the Joint Temecula/Murrieta Transportatior~ Committee, a study report was received regarding planning and implementing traffic measures in the I-15 and 215 corridors between the two cities through 2015. He stated he will have a recommendation for the City Council within the next month, and the item should be placed on the agenda for discussion as soon as possible. Councilmember Stone asked Public Works Director Joe Kicak for an update on the completion date for Winchester Overpass. Public Works Director Kicak stated, based on progress to date, the additional lanes should be open the end of May; however, lighting and landscaping work may continue for a couple of months. Councilmember Stone asked when construction will begin on the Rancho California Bridge and Mr. Kicak stated it will probably be September 1997. Mr. Kicak reported that a new contract with General Telephone Company for relocation of certain facilities in that area will be before the Council at the April 22, 1997 meeting. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Birdsall removed Item No. 13, to accommodate requests to speak on that item. Mayor Pro Tem Roberts requested a correction on the minutes of March 25. Page 2 should read: Mayor Pro Tern Roberts and Councilmember Ford presented Special Achievement Awards. Councilmember Stone noted an abstention on Item 2.2 since he was not present at the March 25, 1997 meeting. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Ford, to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-12 and 14-15 as amended, with Councilmember Stone abstaining on Item 2.2. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts,' Stone, Birdsall NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None 1. Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Minutes\040897 -3- 05/07/97 City Council Minutes Aoril 8 . 1997 Minutes 2.1 Approve the minutes of March 18, 1997. 2.2 Approve the minutes of March 25, 1997. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone Resolution Approving List of Demands 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-32 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A City Treasurer's Report 4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of February 28, 1997. Records Destruction Approval 5.1 Approve the scheduled destruction of certain City records in accordance with the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. Sale of Police Canine 6.1 Authorize sale of Temecula Police Department canine "Tango" to Charles Mungle for the sum of one dollar. Accept Public Improvements in Parcel MaD 781 ?? (Located east of Meadows Parkway, between Rancho California Road and Rancho Vista Road) 7.1 Accept the public improvements; Minutes\040897 -4- 05/07/97 Citv Council Minutes A~ril 8. 1997 10. 11. 7.2 Authorize reduction of the Faithful Performance Bond amount, initiation of the one-year warranty period and release of the Monument Bond for Parcel Map 28122; 7.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety. Acceptance of Public Street into the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tract No. 26861-1) (Located Southwesterly of intersection of Margarita Road at Highway 79S) 8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-38 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREET INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM {WITHIN TRACT NO. 26861-1) Accept Public Improvements and Acknowledge Private Improvements in Tract No. 26861-! {Located Southwesterly of intersection of Margarita Road at Highway 79S) 9.1 Accept the public improvements and acknowledge private improvements; 9.2 Authorize reduction of the faithful performance bond amounts for streets~ drainage, and water improvements, initiation of the one-year warranty period, and release of the Subdivision Monument Bond for Tract No. 26861-1; 9.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety. Acknowledge Completion of Certain Improvements in Tract No. 26861-F (Located Southwesterly of intersection of Margarita Road at Highway 79S) 10.1 Acknowledge completion of certain improvements in Tract No. 26867-F; 10.2 Authorize reduction in Faithful Performance Bond amounts for the improvement of private street, water, and sewer system improvements, initiation of the one- year warranty period, and release of the Subdivision Monument Bond; 10.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety. Temecula Creek Channel - Campanula Way Storm Drain Project No. 7-0-0047 Tracts No, 24187 through 94186 and 94188 Cooperative Agreement 11.1 Approve Temecula Creek Channel - Campanula Way Storm Drain Project No. 7- 0-0047 Tracts No. 24182 through 24186 and 24188 Cooperative Agreement with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and the Newland Associates, Inc.; Minutes\040897 -5- 05/07/97 City Council Minutes 12. 14. 15. 13. Aoril 8. 1997 11.2 Authorize the execution and attestation of such agreement in its final form b~; the City Manager and City Clerk. Completion and Acceotance of the Construction of FY96-97 Slurrv Seal Program, Proiect No. PW96-11 12.1 Accept the construction of the FY96-97 Slurry Seal Program, Project No. PW96- 11. 12.2 File Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; 12.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. Extension of Citv Manager's Fmployment Agreement 14.1 Approve the "First Amendment to Employment Agreement" between the City and City Manager Ronald Bradley. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 97-04 15.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO 97-04 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING SECTION 2.08.060 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING A VOLUNTARY CAMPAIGN EXPENDITURE CEILING FOR ELECTIONS TO CITY OFFICES AND PROVIDING FOR AN INCREASE IN THE CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION LIMITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLITICAL REFORM ACT OF 1996 (PROPOSITION 208) Walker Basin S[~ecific Plan Community Development Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report. Dennis Klimmek, Counsel with Lorenz Alhadeff Law Firm, representing Kemper Corp. and KL-75 who own the Walker Basin project, stated that misinformation was given at the March 18, 1997 meeting regarding the Walker Basin Specific Plan and asked the Council not adopt this resolution. Edward Fitzpatrick, 1510 Front Street, Suite 100, San Diego, representing Imprimis LLC, who is under contract to purchase Walker Basin, addressed statements regarding the EIR and EIR process. He also requested this resolution not be adopted. Minutes\040897 -6- 05/07/97 City Council Minutes A~ril 8. 1997 Councilmember Lindemans asked if it is required to widen the narrow winding road to get into Walker Basin. Mr. Fitzpatrick replied the Conditions of Approval require the installation of a pass lane through the City of Temecula and uphill grades -- about 4 ~ miles. He added the dirt portion of DeLuz Road is to be improved to a paved, two-lane road with bike lanes. Mayor Pro Tem Roberts questioned if there were any required improvements in Temecula. Mr. Fitzpatrick answered there is the construction of a passing lane which will start in the industrial area of Temecula and go to the switchback curves - - about 3,000 to 4,000 feet. Councilmember Stone expressed his belief that there has been a breech of due process on this project and it would be appropriate to re-agendize this item because of new information and to verify some of the assertions with the Planning Department. Councilmember Lindemans mentioned since this project is in the County, County staff should also be invited. Dennis Chiniaeff, 27555 Ynez Road, #200, consultant to Kemper and Imprimis, stated this property is well outside the City's sphere of influence and no notification was received about this item being on the March 18, 1997 agenda. He wondered why the project did not go to Planning Commission for review before coming to the Council. He said Walker Basin was approved prior to the City's formation and should have been considered when making decisions on other projects. He asked that no action be taken this evening. John Thomas, 44200 Tostuga, member of the Santa Rosa Community Service District, spoke in favor of the resolution, based on increased traffic and the need for a new business plan, City Attorney Thorson added the code requires that before this phase of project is approved, there be a finding there has not been a change in the project or the County has data determining there has not been significant changes. He reiterated the resolution before the Council does not demand a subsequent EIR be prepared, but that the County undertake additional environmental review. Mayor Pro Tem Roberts stated he does not want to bring this item back before the Council, since it is not within the City or the City's sphere of influence. It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, and seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Roberts to approve staff recommendation. Councilmember Ford stated the resolution says the EIR documentation is inadequate in addressing the impact and would like to change the wording to "may be inadequate": Minutes\040897 -7- O5/07/97 City Council Minutes Aoril 8 . 1997 Councilmember Lindemans amended the motion, which was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, to change the second line of the resolution to read "may be" instead of "is". The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Mayor Birdsall called a recess at 8:01 PM to accommodate the scheduled Community Services District, Redevelopment Agency, Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority, and Old TownANestside Improvement Authority Meetings. The meeting was reconvened at 8:21 PM. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1 6. Development Impact Fees City Manager Ron Bradley presented the staff report. Joe Colgan, DMG, highlighted the key issues and findings of the study. City Manager Bradley reviewed a list of questions which summarized unresolved issues raised in Sam Alhadeff's letter of April 3, 1997. Mr. Alhadeff represents the Murrieta/Temecula Group. Mayor Birdsall recessed the meeting at 9:12 PM and reconvened at 9:23 PM by Mayor Pro Tem Ron Roberts. Mayor Pro Tern Roberts opened the public hearing at 9:23 PM. Robert Righetti, California Building, Suite 211, Ynez Road, representing the Private Development DIF Committee, thanked staff for their efforts and expressed his support for DIF, with a few reservations. He stated his concerns are: not loading the entire burden on the development community; the Temecula catch-up mode needs to be borne by the existing development community; inventory should include assessment district inventory; developer's ability to negotiate credit for what has already been paid or what has been done on a regional basis. Councilmember Stone asked if Mr. Righetti had a recommended mechanism to assess the existing development community for the unbuilt unconditional Minutes\040897 -8- O5/07/97 City Council Minutes Aaril 8 . 1997 Mayor improvements. Mr. Righetti replied although that is a Council policy decision, they could ascertain the cost of unbuilt facilities and determine a certain percentage is the responsibility of existing development. Lon Beusegard, 23766 Via Madrid, Murrieta, President of Southwest Manufacturers Council, reported there are manufacturing businesses located in Temecula that affect the quality of life by keeping commuters employed in the city. He reported the loss of a company to the county because of traffic and the ambiguity of DIF. He urged the Council to retain the development agreement, and mentioned many members have money on deposit and there is confusion regarding those deposits. Tom Eidem, Executive Director of EDC, urged the Council to be as creative as possible to ensure Temecula can become "business friendly". Sam Marasco, 12625 High Bluff Drive, Encinitas, asked the Council to not accept the resolution because Exhibit A numbers are not consistent with staff's report and Footnote 2 should read "non-residential" instead of residential. He stated credit and. grandfather language is vague and ambiguous and leaves the City open to confusing interpretation. He stated the fee for a commercial building is a 10% surcharge and for a house, 2%, and this should be equalized. He asked to have the cost spread as far as possible over the greatest number of people, thereby mitigating disparities and inconsistencies. Councilmember Stone asked for a recommendation on a way to spread the cost. Mr. Marasco suggested putting infrastructure financing to a citizen vote. Ms. Kuhns agreed the footnote should read non-residential; but the fees shown in Exhibit A are the maximum ones the Council has the option to adopt. Lyle Peterson, 29834 Corte Granada, Pastor at Hope Lutheran Church, expressed his gratitude that churches, synagogues and non-profit organizations will be given special consideration. Ms. Kuhns proposed adding Subsection C to Section 1506020 to say "For the purposes of this section, developer shall not include any non-profit organization that is exempt from taxes by Chapter 4 commencing with Section 23701 of Part 11 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code or Subchapter F commencing with Section 501 of Chapter 1 of subtitle A of Internal Revenue Code of 1986 or the successor to either of these laws." She stated this language basically exempts non- profit organizations from the fee. Birdsall returned to the meeting at 9:56 PM. Counciimember Stone expressed his support for Ms. Kuhns' intent, but wants to make certain it only applies to churches and non-profit community service organizations. Mr. Thorson stated a broad category of community service Minutes\040897 -9- 05/07/97 City Council Minutes Aaril 8. 1997 organizations is necessary and exemption of non-profit or non-profit-providing- community service organizations would be up to the Council. He said this change exempts non-profit organizations from the development fee ordinance, not from an organizational review. It was moved by Councilmember Stone, and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, to extend the meeting to 11 :O0 PM. The motion was passed unanimously. Peter Sterling, 2398 San Diego Avenue, San Diego, spoke in opposition to the proposal and requested the fees be spread across the board, with very few exceptions. Mr. Sterling stated it is important to encourage speculative building because prospective tenants become interested when they see an actual building. He believes the $4.20/square foot fee is unfair and exorbitant, and credit should be given for regional improvement costs. Jeff Minkler, 30410 Del Rey Road, representing the MurrietaFFemecula Groups, stated his opposition is because a developer may pass over the community if he feels the fees are exorbitant. He suggested federal grants or an overall tax to fix the traffic. He urged the Council to keep the fees low, and to consider a payment plan over a five (5) year period similar to one instituted by the Water District. Marty Smith, 41975 Winchester Drive, representing Westside Business Center, stated his opposition to the proposed fees. He suggested a marketing program or time period between adoption and implementation, to waive or substantially discount the fee for the first million feet of speculative building. Daniel Walker, 4940 Heliz Hills, representing Bailey Building Corporation, spoke in opposition to the proposal because the lease rates in Temecula barely support the amount of needed investment. Fred Grimes, 27311 Jefferson Avenue, #193, representing CDM/Westmar Commercial Real Estate, asked for a reconsideration of the $4.20 fee and suggested a $2.00 cap across the board, with one exception, restaurants, who are big traffic generators. Dave DuFour, 465 Liro Street, Solana Beach, representing Four-Sher Development Co., spoke in opposition to DIF as it will deter speculative building. He explained the City of Carlsbad's two-fold DIF structure. Allen Nunez, real estate broker and industrial specialist, stated Temecula has a low vacancy factor, yet does not have adequate inventory for companies to expand. He said fees should be as minimal as possible and supported deferment of the first million square footage. Councilmember Lindemans suggested a graduated fee which would get to 90% over' a given period of time. Minutes\040897 -1 O- 05/07/97 Citv Council Minutes Aaril 8. 1997 It was moved by Councilmember Stone, and seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Roberts, to extend the meeting until 12:00 PM. The motion was passed with Councilmember Lindemans voting no. It was moved by Councilmember Stone, and seconded by Councilmember Lindemans, to continue Item 1 $ to the April 22, 1997 meeting. AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Stephen Bieri, 417 Carmel Street, #200, San Marcos, spoke in opposition to the proposal and agreed credit should be given for assessment district costs and improvement of sphere of influence facilities. Mark McGuire, 19900 MacArthur Blvd, Irvine, representing Newland Associates, agreed with the fee credit concept and suggested the same mechanism should apply to any facility that benefits the region. Mr. McGuire disagreed with the proposed 50% credit cap for park sites and improvements because a large, self-contained community developer should get full credit for those facilities. He asked for clarification on previously obtained credits or reimbursements. Mr. McGuire suggested if development agreements are done, some of their sales tax be earmarked for special funds to build needed improvements without sufficient funding. He suggested taking the sphere out because it is the farthest out in the development horizon and including improvements is speculative. Mr. Thornhill clarified the development agreement being referred to should be called "Development Fee Reduction Agreement". Mayor Birdsall closed the public hearing at 11:23 PM. Mayor Birdsall called for a recess at 11:24 PM and the meeting was reconvened at 11:34 PM. Mayor Birdsall called for Item 17 to be heard prior to conclusion of the Public Hearing. COUNCIL BUSINESS 17. Disposition of Surolus ComDuter Inventory City Clerk June Greek presented the staff report. Minutes\040897 -11- 05107/97 Citv Council Minutes Aoril 8. 1997 It was moved by Councilmember Stone, and seconded by Councilmember Ford, to contact the Temecula Friends of the Library and public schools to determine their interest in receiving donations of the surplus computer equipment on an "as is" condition. All equipment not donated is to be declared unusable and disposed of as scrap. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Mayor Birdsall continued with Public Hearing Item No. 16. Councilmember Lindemans expressed his concerns as: the inequity of a furniture store paying four times more in fees than a restaurant; consideration of getting the fee at 100% over a period of years; $4.20 for retail is too high because they have additional fees from the building fees; and inclusion of the sphere of influence (roads). Mayor Pro Tern Roberts stated he felt further study was needed on the sphere of influence and the sliding scale issues. Councilmember Stone emphasized the need for adequate infrastructure for positive growth. He asked staff to research the long-term ramification of a graduated scale and express concern about the $4.20 commercial fee. Councilmember Ford expressed interest in discussing the following: citywide vs a subzone; a graduated fee; the sphere trip calculation and how they relate to sphere dollars and inequities when looking at homes vs jobs contribution. Mayor Birdsall voiced her objection to dividing the city into subzones. Mayor Birdsall reopened the public hearing at 11:59 PM It was moved by Councilmember Linderoans, and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, to continue the matter to a workshop meeting to be held May 6, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Hall. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT None given. Minutes\040897 -12- 05/07/97 City Council Minutes CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Stone to adjourn at 12:02 AM to a meeting on April 22, 1997, 7:00 PM, Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. April 8 . 1997 ATTEST: Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk Minutes\040897 -13- 05/07/97 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD APRIL 22, 1997 EXECUTIVF SFSSION A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:38 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Stone., seconded by Councilmember Ford to adjourn to Executive Session at 5:38 PM, pursuant to Government Code Sections: 1. §54956.9 (c), Conference with Legal Counsel - Whether to Initiate Litigation, one matter. 2. §54956.9(b), Conference with Legal Counsel, Anticipated Litigation, one matter. 3. §54957.6, Conference with Labor Negotiator - City of Temecula, Negotiator: Grant Yates. The motion was unanimously carried, with Mayor Pro Tern Roberts and Councilmember Lindemans absent. The Executive Session was adjourned at 6:50 PM. A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:03 PM at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Mayor Birdsall presiding. PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson, and City Clerk June S. Greek. PRELUDE MUSIC The prelude and intermission music was provided by Katie Rubke. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor Mike Patton, Southwest Christian Church. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilmember Ford. PROCLAMATION/PRFSENTATIONS Jody Lawlor, representing the Murrieta Rotary Club, presented a Certificate of Appreciation to Mayor Birdsall and the City Council for their generous support of Valley Family Support Services. Minutes\042297 -1- 05/07/97 Citv Council Minutes April 22. 1997 Mayor Birdsall proclaimed the month of May, "National Mental Health Month 1997." Gall Ewing thanked Mayor Birdsall and the City Council for this proclamation and stated informational pamphlets are available in the back of the room. Mayor Birdsall proclaimed the month of May as "National Nurses Month." Gall Shockley, Ramona Visiting Nurses Association and Hospice, thanked Mayor Birdsall and the City Council for this proclamation. Mayor Birdsall proclaimed May 4-10, 1997 "Hire-a-Veteran Week." Leon Medrano, Disabled Veterans Outreach Programs Specialist, urged all employers to hire veterans. Mayor Birdsall proclaimed May 11-17 to be "National Preservation Week." Suzanne St. John of the Old Town Temecula Main Street Association, thanked the Mayor and City Council for the proclamation. She announced the Antique Faire will be opening on May 11th. Joan Padberg, also with the Main Street Association, thanked the City Council for their assistance on the Rod Run and presented a plaque and official Rod Run Posters to the City Council. Mayor Birdsall stated a Certificate of Appreciation was given to the City Council of the City of Temecula for their support of Student Ambassadors from Margarita Middle School. Mayor Birdsall announced the County of Riverside, Department of Public Health is celebrating National Infant Immunization Week and urged all parents to check with their doctor to make sure children are up-to-date with their immunizations. She stated additional information will be available at City Hall. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT City Attorney Thorson stated in accordance with the provisions of the Brown Act, he had nothing to report from Closed Session. PUBLIC COMMENTS Irv Rhodes, 41585 Zinfandel Avenue, representing the Seniors Golden Years of Temecula Valley, requested the name of the senior center be changed to reflect the name of Mary Phillips, whose volunteer efforts were instrumental in the establishment of the Senior Center. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Roberts reported he and Councilmember Ford met with the Tribal Council subcommittee on April 9, 1997, and covered concerns raised by homeowner associations and citizens living near the casino area. Councilmember Ford reported properties adjacent to tribal land have been purchased by the tribe and they are working with archeoiogical, historical, and biological resources as this property has a historical significance to the tribe, He reported that the Pechangas have no Minutes\042297 -2- 05/07/97 City Council Minutes A~)ril 22. 1997 plans to develop the property which has been posted as private property and it is hoped people will respect these signs. Councilmember Ford invited interested citizens to attend a meeting of the Murrieta Creek Advisory Committee, to be held Thursday, April 24, 1997, 9 AM, at Murrieta City Hall, where the Army Corps of Engineers will give a presentation on detailed time lines and study status for the Creek. Councilmember Roberts asked for an update on Pala Bridge. Public Works Director Joe Kicak, reported the EIR has been completed and is in its final review by the State Historio Preservation Officer. He stated construction is anticipated to begin in September 1998, and completed by late 1999 or early 2000. Councilmember Stone announced, The Citizens for a Safer Temecula will conduct a forum April 29, 1997 at 7:30 PM at the Community Recreation Center entitled "Child Lures: Community Plans for Prevention of Sexual Assault and Abduction''. Mayor Birdsall expressed her appreciation at being invited to the car wash held on April 20, 1997, to assist Allison Sanchez. He gave a special thanks to the Pechanga Tribe who donated $2,500 and to all others who participated. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Birdsall announced she would vote "no" on Item No. 7 and would abstain on Item No. 10. Mayor Pro Tern Roberts requested the removal of Items No. 7 and 11 from the Consen{ Calendar. It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-6, 8, 9 and 10, with Mayor Birdsall abstaining on Item No. 10. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None 1. Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Minutes\042297 -3- 05/07/97 City Council Minutes ,, 6 Aoril 22. 1997 Resolution A!;)Drovino List of Demands 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-35 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Motor Vehicle Fueling Agreement 3.1 Approve the Motor Vehicle Fueling Agreement between the City of Temecuta and Temecula Valley Unified School District. Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 74134-2 (Located at the Southeasterly corner of Pauba Road at Margarita Road) 4.1 Accept the public improvements in Tract No. 24134-2; 4.2 Authorize the initiation of the one-year warranty period, reduction in the Faithful Performance Street, Water and Sewer Security amounts, release of the faithful performance and labor and material securities; 4.3 Accept substitute securities for faithful performance warranty and labor and materials purposes; 4.4 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Sureties. Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System {Within Tract No. 94134-9 {Located at the Southeasterly corner of Pauba Road at Margarita Road) 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREE'F SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 24134-2) Parcel MaD No. ?8508 {Located at the Southeast Corner of Winchester Road and Country Glen Way) 6.1 Approve Parcel Map No. 28508, subject to the Conditions of Approval. Minutes\042297 -4- 05/07/97 Citv Council Minutes Ar~ril 22. 1997 8 Agreement with GTE California for the Rancho California Road at Interstate Route 15, Interchange Improvements ¢Proiect No, PW95-1 ?) 8.1 Approve the Interagency Agreement and authorize the Mayor to execute documents. Solicitation of Construction Bids for Citywide Intelligent Traffic Manaaement System - Phase II. Project No, PW95-16 9.1 Approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Project No. PW95-16, Citywide Intelligent Traffic Management System {ITS) - Phase Ii. 9.2 Advance $290,590.00 from Development Impact Fees to the Capital Improvements Project Fund. 10 All-Way "Stop" - Del Rev Road at Solana Way and Del Rey Road at Avenida Del ReDoso 10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING ALL-WAY "STOP' SIGN LOCATIONS ON DEL REY ROAD AT SOLANA WAY AND ON DEL REY ROAD AT AVENIDA DEL REPOSO 7 Walcott Corridor. Project PW94-!0. Additional Work Councilmember Roberts stated he will support this Change Order for $54,000 as long as it is agreed the designer will be billed for the miscalculation. It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, and seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve staff recommendation. 7.1 Approve an additional cost of $54,000 to complete the improvements for the Walcott Corridor Project, PW94-10. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Linderoans, Roberts, Stone NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Minutes\042297 -5- 05/07/97 City Council Minutes 11 Aoproval for RFP for Weed Abatement Services Aj~ril 22. 1997 Mayor Pro Tem Roberts expressed concern over this process starting so late in the season and stated he would like to see an earlier start for weed abatement in future years. Building Official Tony Elmo stated staff is prepared to begin weed abatement earlier. The Request for Proposal is a method to begin and complete the work early in the season. Mayor Birdsall asked Chief Jim Barron to make a brief presentation at a future City Council meeting to inform the public of some basic things they can do around their home to help with fire protection. City Attorney Thorson stated other cities using the RFP process have found, because of the resources of the contractor, more properties are inspected with more compliance in a shorter period of time. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to approve staff recommendation as follows: 11.1 Approve the issuance of an RFP for Weed Abatement Services. The motion was unanimously carried. RECESS Mayor Birdsall called a recess at 7:36 PM to accommodate the scheduled Community Services District, Redevelopment Agency, Old TownANestside Community Facilities District Financing Authority and Old Town/Westside Improvement Authority Meetings. The meeting was reconvened at 7:45 PM. Mayor Birdsall reordered the agenda to hear Items 18, 20, 21 and 17. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1 8 Old Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee Appointment Councilmember Stone abstained due to a conflict of interest. City Clerk June Greek presented the staff report. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Ford to appoint Randy Holland to serve an unexpired term on the Old Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee which will expire September 26, 1999. Minutes\042297 -6- 05/07/97 City Council Minutes Aoril 22. 1997 2O 21 The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone Prima Facie Speed Limits on Certain Streets ¢Ynez Road between Rancho California Road and Winchester Road: Del Rey Road and Via Norte: Moraga Road between Rancho California Road and Margarita Road: Margarita Road between Rancho California Road and State Route 79 South: Jefferson Avenue between Winchester Road and North City Limits) Public Works Director Joseph Kicak presented the staff report. Mayor Birdsall asked whether she and Councilmember Roberts needed to abstain as their residences are close to a mentioned location. City Attorney Thorson replied they did not need to abstain because the proposal affects all members of the public. It was moved by Counciimember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Ford to approve staff recommendation as follows: 20.1 introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled. ORDINANCE NO. 97-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(d) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FAClE SPEED LIMIT ON (1) YNEZ ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD (2) DEL REY ROAD AND VIA NORTE {3! MORAGA ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND MARGARITA ROAD {4) MARGARITA ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH (5) JEFFERSON AVENUE BETWEEN WINCHESTER ROAD AND NORTH CITY LIMITS. The motion was unanimously carried. Review and Approval of 1996-97 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments Assistant Finance Director Tim McDermott presented the staff report. It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to approve staff recommendation as follows: Minutes\042297 -7- 05/07/97 City Council Minutes Aoril 22. 1997 21.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-40 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET The motion was unanimously carried. 17 Temecula Library Presentation Senior Management Analyst Allie Kuhns presented a status report to the City Council, Mayor Birdsall called for a recess at 8:00 PM and reconvened the meeting at 8:07 PM. PUBLIC HEARINGS 12 Planning Application No. PA96-0793 (Development Plan - Appeal) - the Design and Construction of 20,619 Souare Feet of Commercial Development Located at the Southwest Corner of Margarita Road and Pauba Road (Ted 7OHOS Applicant) Community Development Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report. Councilmember Lindemans asked if it would be possible, if Mr. Zonos was agreeable, to place an irrevocable rider stating off-premise alcohol sales would never be allowed at this site to the Deed of Trust which would run with the land in perpetuity. City Attorney Thorson replied this type of rider is possible. Mayor Birdsall opened the public hearing at 8:29 PM. Larry Markham, 41750 Winchester Road, Suite L, representing Ted Zonos, the property owner, stated this proposal meets new design guidelines and the proposed ingress and egress was at direction of staff. Mr. Markham clarified concerns raised at the Planning Commission public hearing have been addressed: design modified by reducing building height to residential scale, breaking building into three structures; elevations enhanced, and soften effect. He addressed the site zoning compatibility and noted neighborhood commercial is the most restrictive zoning within the City. Councilmember Roberts stated he did not see the companion project that will use same driveway and there is a problem trying to cross Margarita Road at that intersection. Mr. Markham replied they could not speculate what the property owner will propose for his property and the applicant is conditioned to build a traffic signal at that location. Councilmember Ford asked what the applicant is willing to do to convince the Council there will not be off-site sales of alcohol. Mr. Markham stated applicant is willing to Minutes~042297 -8- 05/07/97 City Council Minutes A~ril 22. 1997 prohibit the off-site sale of alcohol, incorporate it into a development agreement and if necessary, record in a trust deed to run with the land. Mr. Thorson placed a letter received from Michael Titus, attorney for the property owner, into the record. Linda J. Campbell, 28750 Vallejo, President of Temecula Valley School Board, presented a resolution from the Temecula Valley Unified School District requesting alcohol sales and related businesses be prohibited in the event this center is approved as they are opposed to any alcohol sales within 600 feet of the high school. Dave Gallagher, representing Temecula Valley Unified School District, reiterated the school district's consistent position prohibiting any type of alcohol sales and related businesses within 600 feet of a school. Jon Hoxter, 31249 Sierra Bonita, presented a petition of over 1,200 signatures requesting this site be re-zoned as office/professional, and the center to be gated and locked during non-business hours. Ruth Ribaudo, 31695 Corte Rosario, representing Citizens for a Safer Temecula, urged the Council to deny the building of this project and/or not allow any sale of alcohol at the site. Lori Robinson, 43615 San Fermin Place, representing the Santiago Homeowners Association, expressed her objection to the proposed development as it is incompatible with surrounding residences and use and submitted a letter of opposition from the Association for the record. Kenneth G. Ray, 31647 Pio Pico Road, spoke in opposition to the mall as it will cause the decline of adjacent residential property values. He asked if the project is approved, that all alcohol sales be prohibited as well as strip mall-type architecture. He presented photos for inclusion in the record. Mike Egler, 31300 Cala Carrasco, expressed concerns regarding restaurant odors, dumpsters and glare from lighting. He also stated plans for a strip mall was not mentioned in the Department of Real Estate's White Report he received when purchasing his home. Alan Phillips, 43150 Corte Almonte, stated he had been told the opposition petition. was flawed because residents had received disclosure documents when buying their homes, and reported the disclosure documents and White Report he and other homebuyers received did not show strip mall and/or did not list the property as commercial. Mayor Birdsall informed Mr. Phillips that she, nor other City Council members, had been told the petition was invalid. Minutes\O42297 -9- 05/07/97 City Council Minutes Aeril 22. 1997 Patricia Phillips, 43150 Corte Almonte, stated there are many alternative uses of this land; i.e., a library; a senior park; professional offices, etc. She mentioned the entire intersection needs to be widened for safety purposes. Mel Copeland, 31286 Santiago Road, objected to the applicant's convenience and need wording as there are two shopping centers in near proximity and 20 other shopping areas in Temecula with 82 vacant retail stores, 73 sit-down restaurants and 32 fast food establishments. Ronald Driscoll, 30321 Sierra Madre Drive, police officer, expressed concern over safety and traffic. He noted the latest traffic analysis report was completed in 1991 and presented photos illustrating current traffic problems in the area. Darryl Drott, 31907 Leigh Lane, retired Deputy Sheriff, stated the consumer base for this location and orientation will be the youth, not nearby residents, and a commercial development of this type will invite a multitude of criminal activity to the area. Mayor Birdsall called for a recess at 9:43 PM and the meeting was reconvened at 9:57 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Ford, and seconded by Councilmember Roberts to extend the meeting to 11:00 PM. AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Chris Randazzo, 31350 Rancho Vista Road, representing Temecula Community Partnership, requested alcohol not be allowed at this site. Tadd Chilcott, 31151 Pauba Road, stated, in 1994, he discussed the site with Mr. Ogle, real estate agent for the property, who expressed his opinion that the site would never be built on and if it was, a convenience store would not be included. Lynn Schoeffler, 30777 San Pasqual Road, representing Parent Advisory Board at Temecula Valley High and Margarita Middle Schools, thanked the City Council for denying alcohol near Chaparral High School and asked the same consideration be given for this project as the Board is opposed to all alcohol and tobacco sales at this site. Jonathan Axton, 30169 Sierra Madre Road, Temecula Valley High School student, spoke in opposition to a mall on this site based on alcohol and tobacco sales and increased traffic. Lanae Turley Trejo, representing Temecula Valley Council PTA, expressed their opposition to the strip mall. Minutes\042297 -10- 05/07/97 City Council Minutes Aaril 22. 1997 Mayor PM. It was extend Mayor Mayor Cecilia Axton, representing Temecula Valley Council PTA, presented a copy of a resolution urging the City Council to overrule the Planning Commission's approval of this project due to alcohol and tobacco sales and increased traffic. Leslie Woods, 29615 Valle Olivera, representing Temecula Valley High School PTSA, asked that the sale of alcohol and tobacco be prohibited. Councilmember Lindemans asked if it is legal to deny the on- or off-site sale of alcohol or tobacco. City Attorney Thorson replied on-site alcohol sale could be denied on a condition use permit, which a subsequent council could overturn. Richard Racicot, 31320 Corte Rimola, suggested architectural changes to improve the project. Art Pelka, 43185 Margarita Road, stated the submitted petition requests the City to purchase the property, for a library possibly; or professional offices would be acceptable; or if approved, no alcohol or tobacco sales, including on-site consumption, be allowed, as the people do not want to monitor alcohol sales on a tenant by tenant basis. Mr. Pelka showed photos of existing malls owned by Mr. Zonos to illustrate why residents are concerned. Larry Markham addressed the concerns raised: the malls shown in the photos were built under totally different building and land use codes and the conditions for this project have specific requirements regarding signing, lighting, landscaping; dumpsters will be completely enclosed. He stated traffic is consistent with the General Plan. He stated the applicant will work with the City on coordinating construction of a sidewalk, but it may not be desirable to have a sidewalk from the park to the site. Councilmember Roberts asked if the applicant had considered the tobacco issue and Mr. Markham replied he does not know if it is an issue with the applicant. Birdsall recessed the meeting at 11:03 PM and the meeting was reconvened at 11:15 moved by Councilmember Roberts, and seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to the meeting for one hour. The motion carried unanimously. Birdsall closed the public hearing at 11:15 PM. Birdsall reopened the public hearing at 11:16 PM Councilmember Roberts asked for the applicant's decision regarding the sale of alcohol and tobacco. Mr. Markham answered the applicant will agree to a prohibition of off- premise alcohol sales to be recorded with the land, embedded in the development agreement, and embodied in the stipulated judgement regarding litigation, and tobacco could be addressed in the same context with the stipulated judgment. He stated on- Minutes\042297 -11- 05/07/97 City Council Minutes Aoril 22. 1997 premise sales and restaurant use are an absolute; otherwise, uses are limited to a point where the parcel becomes economically unviable. Mayor Birdsall closed the public hearing at 11:20 PM. Councilmember Lindemans proposed no on-site or off-site sale of alcohol or tobacco be permitted. Councilmember Roberts stated he could not vote for this project without a complete denial of on- and off-site sales of alcohol. Councilmember Stone stated he will support this development with the elimination of the back alleyway and prohibition of off-site alcohol, and questioned the need of an on- site alcohol sale establishment as there are numerous other uses which will provide financial viability to the site. It was moved by Councilmember Stone, and seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to recess to closed session at 11:52 PM. City Attorney Thorson cited Government Code Section 54956.9(b). The motion was passed unanimously. The meeting was reconvened at 12:25 AM. City Attorney Thorson reported the Council adjourned to receive legal advice and stated in accordance with the Brown Act, there is nothing to report from Closed Session. It was moved by Councilmember Stone, and seconded by Councilmember Lindemarts to adopt 1 2.1, 12.2, and 12.3 with the following modifications: 1) there will be no permitted on- and off-site sale of alcohol and tobacco; 2) the rear alley accessibility is to be removed; 3) the center building shown in Exhibit "Z" is to be divided to create a plan consisting of four buildings. 12.1 Adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA96-0293; 12.2 Adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA96- 0293; 12.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-38 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0293 {DEVELOPMENT PLAN - APPEAL), UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0293 {DEVELOPMENT PLAN) Minutes\042297 - 12- 05107/97 Citv Council Minutes Aoril 22. 1997 TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT A 20,619 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 2.65 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND PAUBA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 945-110-003 The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None 13 Use of Local ! aw Enforcement Block Grant Funds Lieutenant Jim Domenoe presented the staff report. Mayor Pro Tem Roberts opened the public hearing at 12:34 AM and closed the Public Hearing at 12:35 AM as there were no requests to speak. It was moved by Mayor Birdsall, and seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Roberts to approve staff recommendation to accept the committees recommendation to use the grant funds to purchase a mobile command center. The motion was carried unanimously. It was moved by Mayor Birdsall, and seconded by Councilmember Ford, to extend the meeting for another hour. The motion was unanimously carried. 14 Planninq ADI;)lication No. PA97-0047, Develol;)ment Code Amendment. ADplication No, PA97-0016, Old Town Specific Plan Amendment. and ADl~lication PA97-0110, Temecula Municipal Code Amendment Planning Planning Councilmember Stone announced a conflict of interest based on property ownership in Old Town and stepped down from the dias. Community Development Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report. Mayor Pro Tern Roberts opened the public hearing. Minutes\042297 -13- 05/07197 Citv Council Minutes Aoril 22. 1997 Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena, spoke against permitting fortune telling in any shape or form. Mayor Pro Tern Roberts closed the public hearing. It was moved by Mayor Birdsall, and seconded by Councilmember Ford to approve the recommendation as follows: 14.1 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AND THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO MAKE CHANGES TO TABLE 17.08(A) OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND TABLE 1 OF THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALLOW "FORTUNE TELLING, OR SIMILAR ACTIVITY" AS PERMITTED USES RATHER THAN CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES AND AMENDING SECTION 5.04.050 (63) THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO DELETE THE REQUIREMENT FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FORTUNE TELLING AND RELATED PRACTICES The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Linderoans, Roberts, Birdsall NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone COUNCIL BUSINESS 15 Consideration of an Ordinance Prohibiting the ConsumPtion of Alcoholic Beverages and Possession of Open Containers of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Places and Prohibiting Engaging in Certain Bodily Functions in Public Places It was moved by Councilmember Stone, and seconded by Councilmember Ford to approve as follows: 15.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97-07 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 9.14 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, PROHIBITING THE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND POSSESSION OF OPEN Minutes\042297 -14- 05/07/97 Citv Council Minutes Aoril 22. 1997 CONTAINERS OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN PUBLIC PLACES, AND SECTION 9.02.010, PROHIBITING ENGAGING IN CERTAIN BODILY FUNCTIONS IN CERTAIN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PLACES, AND AMENDMENT SECTION 12.04.210 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN CITY PARKS AND FACILITIES Councilmember Ford requested all homeowner associations be notified that to extend the prohibition of drinking alcoholic beverages to their common areas requires a request for approval from the City Council. The motion was unanimously carried. 16 Presentation by TCI Cable It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, and seconded by Councilmember Ford to continue this item to the meeting of May 13, 1997, and to be placed at the beginning of the agenda. 19 Resolution Designating a "Billboard Free" 7one It was moved by Councilmember Stone, and seconded by Councilmember Ford to approve as follows: 19.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-39 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DESIGNATING A "BILLBOARD FREE" ZONE IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND ITS SPHERE OF INFLUENCE CITY MANAGER'S REPORT City Manager Bradley stated the DIF Workshop needs to be rescheduled from May 6, 1997. The meeting was rescheduled to May 8, 1997, 7 PM, Temecula City Council Chambers. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT None given. Minutes\042297 -15- 05107/97 City Council Minutes Aoril 22. 1997 ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Linderoans, seconded by Councilmember Stone to adjourn at 12:45 AM to a meeting on April 8, 1997, DIF Workshop, 7:00 PM, Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Next regular meeting: May 13, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk Minutes~042297 -16- 05/07/97 ITEM 3 RF_~OLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF.~L~.,A ALLOWING CI~TAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN E,XH mlT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF_,CULA DOES RESOLVE, DETER.MllqE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $2,454,309.20 Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 13th day of May, 1997. ATTEST: Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor June $. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] 1:34 I STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June $. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 97- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 13th day of May, 1997 by the following roll call vote: COUNCIL~NIBF~RS: NOES: COUNCIL~F.~,S: COUNCILMEMBERS: 3true S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk R¢so 134 2 CITY OF TEMECULA MST OF DEMANDS 04/17/97 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 04/24/97 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 05/01/97 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 05/13/97 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 04/17/97 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 05/01/97 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 5113/97 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 165 190 191 192 193 194 210 280 3O0 320 330 340 390 GENERAL FUND RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY~IP INSURANCE FUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILmES TCSD DEBT SERVICE $ 679,393.36 64,630.71 138,175.20 15,218.77 18,543.86 28,114.12 1,540.31 808,649.46 14,824.14 31,945.51 5,901.76 11,693.29 2,224.80 425,370.87 387,981 411,114.24 972,738.45 136,345.17 140,758.71 2.454.309.20 2,177,205.32 PAYROLL: 001 165 190 191 192 193 194 28O 3OO 320 330 340 GENERAL R DA-LOW/MOD TCSD TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D RDA-CIP INSURANCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILmES TOTAL BY FUND: PREPARED BY THERESA A~.A~REZ~, ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST 194,125.62 3,043.43 53,850.63 139.66 349.68 5,490.63 2,053.68 5,422.69 1,254.73 3,276.27 1,843.50 6,263.46 277,103.88 $ 2,454,309.20 , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. E2 ~97 13:0~ CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 10 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LCY,//MOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP ~00 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 3GO FACILITIES AMOUNT 65,673.6,8 24,350.88 17,288.80 12,761.13 18,397.06 2,617.93 476.98 194,291.85 71,329.00 331.68 11,6~3.03 4,899.72 1,309.13 TOTAL 425,370.87 VOUCHRE2 04/17/97 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 42869 42870 42871 42871 42872 42873 621572 621572 621572 621572 621572 621572 621572 621572 621572 621572 621572 621572 621572 621572 621572 621572 621572 621572 621572 621572 621572 621572 621572 621572 649578 649578 649578 649578 649578 649578 649578 649578 649578 649578 649578 649578 649578 649578 649578 13:09 CHECK DATE 04/10/97 04/10/97 04/11/97 04/11/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 VENDOR NUMBER 001403 002186 002?52 002?52 002663 002663 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 00028~ 00028~ 00028~ 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 0OO444 VENDOR NAME TEMECULA VALLEY SOCCER ZUNA, PAUL MCLEAN, BARBARA MCLEAN, BARBARA MULTIMEDIA CONNECTIONS MULTIMEDIA CONNECTIONS ]NSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (iRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX CIRS) INSTATAX (1RS) INSTATAX (IRS) 1NSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX CIRS) INSTATAX CIRS) INSTATAX CIRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTAT/O((IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX CIRS) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EO0) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) iNSTATAX (EDD) CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION COMM SRVCS FUNDING 96-97 REIMB:P.ZUNA ELECT CERTIFICATN 3/28-4/2 CONSULT SVC-CM OFFICE WORKERS COMP COVERAGE 3/28-4/2 FINAL PMT CD-ROM SRVCS (1500) TEMECULA~S (D-ROMPS 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEOICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000444 SOI 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 0004.44 STATE ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-100-999-5267 001-162-999-5261 280-199-999-5250 001-1182 001-26~0 280-199-999-5270 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 193-2070 280-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 ITEM AMOUNT 5,000.00 105.00 105.00 1.80- 1,500.00 2,025.00 14,692.87 128.88 3,426.38 8.92 22.13 343.50 158.78 325.27 134.69 415.63 101.15 214.56 3,581.25 48.10 940.74 2.38 6.10 94.97 38.79 88.66 24.37 66.56 28.42 102.68 30.61 3.27 46.17 1.56 2.28 3.70 3,906.78 49.88 769.90 1.63 3.80 67.72 28.76 108.19 41.83 CHECK AMOUNT 5,000.00 105.00 103.20 1,500.00 2,025.00 24,995.78 L VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 6/+9578 6/+9578 6~9578 970411 42876 42876 42876 42877 42878 42879 42879 42879 42879 42879 42879 42880 42881 42881 42881 42881 42881 42881 42882 42883 42884 42885 42886 42887 42888 42888 42888 13:09 CHECK DATE 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/11/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 VENDOR NUMBER OOO444 000444 000444 000106 000106 000106 002729 001375 000101 000101 000101 000101 000101 000101 000101 000101 001424 000622 000622 000622 000622 000622 000622 000370 000702 000152 002763 000135 000135 000135 000137 000137 VENDOR NAME INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) CENTURY 21WRIGHT-ESCRO ALFAX WHOLESALE FURNITU ALFAX WHOLESALE FURNITU ALFAX WHOLESALE FURN]TU ALLEN CONSTRUCTION COMP AMERICAN CONSTRUCTION APPLE ONE, INC. APPLE ONE, INC. APPLE ONE, INC. APPLE ONE, INC. APPLE ONE, INC. APPLE ONE, INC. APPLE ONE, INC. APPLE ONE, [NC. AUDIENCES UNLIMITED, IN BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER BIRDSALL, PATRICIA BROOKSTONE CONSTRUCTION BROWN, SANDRA CAODY GRAPHICS CALIFORNIA PARKS & RECR CALIFORNIA PRESERVATION CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CHEVRON U S A INC. CHEVRON U S A INC. CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERlOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION OOOf~r,~ STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 1ST TIME HONEBUYER: MUNOZ CLEAR DISPLAY RACKS FREIGHT TAX RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. NEMBERSHIP:J.HOOSON:1997 YEAR TEMP HELP W/E 2/1J.YONKER TEMP HELP WE 2/1 J.BARNETT TE#P HELP W/E 2/1J.BARNETT TENP HELP W/E 3/22 J.YONKER TEMP HELP W/E 3/22 L.RUSCH TEMP HELP W/E 3/22 J.BARNETT TEMP HELP W/E 3/29 J.YONKER TENP HELP W/E 3/29 A.STOFFEY TV TAPING EXCURSION ELECTRICAL SRVCS-TCSD PARKS ELECTRICAL SRVCS-TCSD PARKS ELECTRICAL SVCS-TCSD PARKS ELECTRICAL SRVCS-CITY HALL ELECTRICAL SERVICES FOR CRC ELECTRICAL SERVICES FOR CRC REIMB:CF:3/7-12 WASHINGTON REFUND: OVERPAYMENT OF PERMIT REFUND: CONTRACTED CLASSES SWING/JITTERBUG DANCE BROCHURE AD-CPRS JOB LINE-CITY REC.COOR MEMBERSHIP:CITY OF TEM:1997 HARDWARE-REPAIR STREET SIGNS HARDWARE-REPAIR STREET SIGNS HARDWARE-REPAIR STREET BIGNS FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES ACCOUNT NUMBER 320-2070 330-2070 3~0-2070 165-199-999-5449 190-184-999-522D 190-186-999-5220 190-184-999-5220 165-199-813-5804 001-163-999-5226 001-140-999-5118 001-150-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 001-140-999-5118 001-110-999-5118 001-150-999-5118 001-140-999-5118 001-110-999-5118 190-183-999-5350 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 340-199-701-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 001-100-999-5258 001-2660 190-18~-4982 190-183-999-5370 190-180-999-5254 280-199-999-5226 001-164-601-52~4 001-164-601-524~ 001-164-601-5244 001-162-~-5263 001-164-602-5262 ITEM AMOUNT 103.63 23.29 27.79 20,600.00 159.00 24.95 11.53 1,120.00 125.00 361.20 216.72 72.24 516.00 72.24 72.24 516.00 316.05 175.00 39.00 449.68 230.50 60.00 455.56 154.~ 184.97 47.25 60.00 90.00 75.00 100.00 187.98 746.30 226.28 29.80 9.88 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 5,220.79 20,600.00 195.48 1,120.00 125.00 2,142.69 175.00 1,389.18 184.97 47.25 60.00 90.00 100.00 1,160.56 39.68 VOUCHRE2 04/17/97 13:09 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 42890 04/17/97 001139 42891 04/17/97 000980 42892 04/17/97 002037 42892 04/17/97 002037 42893 04/17/97 002756 42894 04/17/97 001275 42895 04/17/97 002379 42896 04/17/97 002533 42897 04/17/97 42897 04/17/97 42898 04/17/97 002106 42899 04/17/97 002759 42900 04/17/97 000155 42900 04/17/97 000155 42901 04/17/97 000518 42902 04/17/97 001669 42903 04/17/97 001380 42903 04/17/97 001380 42903 04/17/97 001380 42903 04/17/97 001380 42903 04/17/97 001380 42903 04/17/97 001380 42903 04/17/97 001380 42903 04/17/97 001380 42904 04/17/97 002390 42905 04/17/97 002562 42906 04/17/97 002765 42907 04/17/97 002128 42908 04/17/97 002?55 42909 04/17/97 002060 42910 04/17/97 001056 VENDOR NAME CHIP MORTON PHOTOGRAPHY COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY COM-AID, INC. CON-AID, INC. COMPLETE EMBROIOERY DES COMPUSERVE, INC. CONMIEnS CREATIVE 8ASKE COUNTRY FRAMING CRAIG, GARY M. CRAIG, GARY M. DA FAMILY SUPPORT DAVCON CARPET CLEANING OAVLIN DAVLIN DEL RIO CARE ANIMAL HOS DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER ELLIS GROUP EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING VENTURES, I ERHART"S CATERING EUROPEAN DELl & CATERIN EXCEL LANOSCAPE CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTIOR PHOTOGRAPHY SRVCS-NAGNACOMP IRRIGATION PARTS AND EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE YARD CABLING MAINTENANCE YARD CABLING EMBROIOERY-SHIRTS-TEM. ONE INFORMATION SERVICES/MAR GIFT BASKETS FRAME REFUND: APPLICATION FEE REFUND: APPLICATION FEE 002106 SUPPORT CARPET CLEANING-TEM.P.D. TAPING OF PLANNING COMM. MTGS TAPING OF PLANNING COMM. MTG TEMECULA PD K-9 MEDICAL EXP. RE-CYCLE PAINT & MISC.SUPPLIES TEMP HELP W/E 3/14 A.ADAMS TEMP HELP W/E 3/14 A.ADAMS TEMP HELP W/E 3/14 A.ADAMS TEMP HELP W/E 3/14 D.BRIDGHAM TEMP HELP W/E 3/28 A.ADAMS TEMP HELP W/E 3/28 A.ADAMS TEMP HELP W/E 3/28 A.ADAMS TEMP HELP W/E 3/28 D.BRIDGHAM 95366-02/DIE80 DR LDSC/MAR FEB APPRAISAL SVCS-KR PALM PLZ EMPLOYER ADDRESS OATA-TEMECULA FEB AUTO/CAD SERVICES REFRESHMENTS-CALLAWAY 3/21/97 REFRESHMENTS-COUNCIL MTG-4/8 LDSC MAINT-V.HILLS/VAR.AREAS ACCOUNT NUMBER 280-199-999-5270 190-180-999-5212 210-190-144-5804 210-190-144-5804 001-110-999-5223 320-199-9~9-5228 280-199-999-5270 001-100-999-5250 001-161-4125 001-161-4125 190-2140 001-170-999-5610 001-161-999-5250 001-161-999-5250 001-170-999-5327 001-164-601-5218 001-150-999-5119 001-110-999-5119 280-199-999-5119 320-199-999-5118 001-150-999-5119 001-110-999-5119 280-199-999-5119 320-199-999-5118 193'180-999-5240 280-1652 280-199-999-5250 001-163-999-5250 280-199-999-5270 001-100-999-5260 193-180-999-5212 ITEM AMOUNT 186.47 22.95 2,988.60 996.20 50.80 9.95 46.50 88.23 132.00 10.50 100.00 40.00 103.50 56.52 32.40 72.52 257.93 257.93 902.T? 2,418.40 271.23 271.23 949.29 2,418.40 159.36 2,325.00 350.00 250.00 676.04 126.70 131.16 CHECK AMOUNT 186.47 22.95 3,98~.80 50.80 9.95 46.50 88.23 142.50 100.00 160.02 32.40 72.52 7,747.18 159.36 2,325.00 350.00 250.00 676.04 12 PAGE 4 13:09 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 42910 42910 42911 42911 42911 42911 42912 42913 42914 42914 42914 42914 42914 42914 42914 42914 ~15 42915 42916 42916 42916 42916 42916 42916 42916 42916 42917 42918 42919 42919 42919 42920 42920 42920 42920 42920 CHECK DATE 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 VENDOR NUMBER 001056 001056 000165 000165 000165 000165 002764 002122 000184 00018~ 00018~ 000184 000184 00018,4 000184 000184 000184 001355 001355 000177 000177 000177 000177 000177 000177 000177 000177 001609 OO1517 002098 002098 002098 000194 000194 000194 000194 000194 001351 001407 VENDOR NAME EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FIFTH AVENUE SUITES HOT FIRST LINE CONSTRUCTION CALIFORNIA - PAYM CALIFORNIA - PAYN CALIFORNIA - PAYM CALIFORNIA - PAYM CALIFORNIA - PAYM CALIFORNIA - PAYM CALIFORNIA - PAYM CALIFORNIA - PAYM CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA, INC. G T E CALIFORNIA, INC. GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT GLENN]ES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GREATER ALARM COMPANY, HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCE HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES RETIREMENT TRUS RETIREMENT TRUS RETIREMENT TRUS RETIREMENT TRUS RETIREMENT TRUS INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION LDSC NA]NT-SLOPES/VARIOUS AREA CR:EXTRA LABOR EXCEEDS CONTRAC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES HTL:MEYER:MTG/MAIN ST:4/27-30 SENIOR CENTER BUILDING REPAIR 909 308-1079/GENERAL USAGE/APR 909 506-1941/PTA CO TTACSO/APR 909 695-1409/GENERAL USAGE/MAR 909 695-3539/COPT-CTY TEMECULA 909 699-0590/ALARM LINES PTA 909 699-1370/SVC FOR COP/MAR 909 699-2309/COPT-CITY OF TEM 909 699-2811/GENERAL USAGE/APR 909 69~-8632/GE#ERAL USAGE/APR APR ACCESS-RVSD CO. OPEN LINE APR ACCESS-RVSD CO. OPEN LINE OFFICE SUPPLIES / TCSD OFFICE SUPPLIES / T.C.C. OFFICE SUPPLIES / T.C.C. OFFICE SUPPLIES/PLANNING OFFICE SUPPLIES / HR OFFICE SUPPLIES / B&S OFFICE SUPPLIES / TCSD OFFICE SUPPLIES / T.C.C. SVC CHECK-ALARM SYS-MAINT YARD ONSITE MGMT CONSULT-MEDIATION MOTORCYCLE PARTS/REPAIR-P.D. MOTORCYCLE PARTS/REPAIR-P.D. MOTORCYCLE PARTS/REPAIR-P.D. 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP SPONSOR:CA TRAVEL MRET:4/25-26 POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS ACCOUNT NUMBER 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5230 001-110-999-5230 001-150-999-5230 001-161-999-5230 280-199-999-5261 190-181-999-5212 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-99~-5208 001-110-999-5223 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 190-180-999-5220 190-184-999-5220 190-184-999-5220 001-161-999-5220 001-150-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-18~-999-5220 001-164-601-5250 001-150-999-5248 001-170-999-5214 001-170-999-5214 001-170-999-5214 001-2080 165- 2080 190-2080 193- 2080 280-2080 280-199-999-5270 190-182-999-5212 ITEM AMOUNT 768.00 131.16- 58.84 9.69 9.69 9.69 523.2O 125.00 56.01 55.09 83.16 40.56 56.01 117.82 38.08 1,200.85 27.75 350.00 305.00 303.96 148.70 11.72 28.66 29.58 76.90 12.73 7.05 ~5.00 1,050.00 27.02 6.06 25.26 1, ~9.45 12.50 420.03 9.64 12.50 1,500.00 241.36 CHECK AMOUNT 768. O0 87.91 523.20 125.00 1,6~5.33 655.00 619.30 75.00 1,050.00 58.3~ 2,194.12 1,500.00 241.36 VOUCHRE2 04/17/97 13:09 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 42923 04/17/97 42924 04/17/97 42925 04/17/97 42926 04/17/97 42927 04/17/97 42927 04/17/97 42928 04/17/97 42928 04/17/97 42928 04/17/97 42929 04/17/97 42930 04/17/97 42931 04/17/97 42931 04/17/97 42932 04/17/97 42933 04/17/97 42934 04/17/97 42935 04/17/97 42936 04/17/97 42937 04/17/97 42938 04/17/97 42939 04/17/97 42940 04/17/97 42941 04/17/97 42942 04/17/97 42943 04/17/97 42943 04/17/97 42944 04/17/97 42945 04/17/97 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 002140 JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS JOHNSON, JILL 001420 JOLLY JUHPS JOLLY, PAMELA JOLLY, PAMELA 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE KOLEK, DEBRA 000945 L P S COMPUTER SERVICE 001534 LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV 001534 LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV 000384 LAW/CRANDALL, INC. 002716 LEONARD ENGINEERING L]NN, CHERYL 002229 LUCE PRESS CLIPPINGS, I 002164 MAHR CONSTRUCTION 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV 000220 000843 001654 002213 000775 000775 002762 000232 MARASCO, SANDI MAURICE PRINTERS, INC. MCDANIEL ENGINEERING CO MONTEREY SYSTEMS, INC. MUFFLERS WEST OF TEMECU MUNIMETRIX SYSTEMS CORP MUNIMETRIX SYSTEMS CORP NATIONAL TRUST (NTHP) NEET, JOHN P., MAI CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 000199 IRS GARN APR-JUN E-MAIL SUPPORT/MAINT. REFUND: CHILDREN'S ART CLASSES JOLLY JUMPS-SPRING EGG HUNT REFUNO:ROON RENTAL CANCELLED REFUND:ROOM RENTAL CANCELLATIO TEMP HELP W/E 3/30 d.EVANS TEMP HELP W/E 3/~0 J.EVANS TEMP HELP W/E 3/~0 J.GREY REFUND: CHILDREN'S CRAFT CLASS LASER PRINTER MAINTENANCE-MAY AIR:D.WILSON:IEEP:4/25-26/97 AIR:ROBERTS:STONE:LEAG.CA.4/30 MAR PROF SVCS-WALEOTT CORRIDOR APR PROF SVCS-PARKVIEW FIRE ST REFUND: CONTRACTED CLASSES LUCE PRESS CLIPPING SERVICE REL.RETENTION:SAM HICKS PARK TEMP HELP W/E 3/'50 J. CASTILLO REFUND: CHILDREN'S ART CLASSES ROA NEWSLETTER PRINTING/TYPEST FEB PROF SVCS-~INCHESTER/I-15 MICROFILM PROCESSING/DUPLICATE INSTALL HITCH/WIRING-PW TRUCK COMPUTER SOFTWARE/SUPPLIES COMPUTER SOFTWARE/SUPPLIES CF:MEYER:MTG/MAIN ST:4/27-30 APPRAISAL SERVICES ON PUJOL ST ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2140 320-199-999-5211 190-183-4982 190-180-999-5301 190-183-4990 190-2900 001-163-999-5118 001-164-604-5118 190-180-999-5118 190-183-4982 320-199-999-5250 280-199-999-5270 001-100-999-5258 210-165-637-5804 210-190-626-5802 190-183-4982 280-199-999-5270 280-2035 001-164-604-5118 190-183-4982 280-199-999-5250 280-199-602-5804 001-120-999-5277 001-164-601-5214 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 280-199-999-5261 165-199-999-5250 ITEM AMOUNT 322.96 300.00 40.00 210.00 230.00 100.00 62.40 353.60 52.14 3.00 310.76 101.00 288.00 2,397.50 2,784.00 25.00 135.15 52,310.81 574.00 40.00 2,423.30 737.50 53.57 277.78 100.00 300.00 385.00 600.00 CHECK AMOUNT 322.96 300.00 40.00 210.00 330.00 468.14 3.00 310.76 3' 2,397.50 2,784.00 25.00 135.15 52,310.81 574.00 40.00 2,42~.30 737.50 53.57 400.00 38c -~ 60~ ~ ~2 PAGE 6 [, 77 13:09 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUHBER 42946 42946 42946 42946 42946 42946 42946 42946 42947 42948 42948 42949 42950 42951 42951 42953 42954 42954 42954 42954 42954 42954 42954 42954 42954 42954 42954 42954 42954 42954 42954 42954 42954 42954 42954 42954 42954 42954 42954 4~7~4 CHECK DATE 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 VENDOR NUMBER 002139 002139 002139 002139 002139 002139 002139 002139 002292 001704 001704 002668 0OO24O 001383 001383 002398 000733 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 O00246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 VENDOR NAME NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT NORTH COUNTY TIMES ' AT OASIS VENDING OLD TO~IN TEMECULA MAIN OLD TO~/N TEMECULA MAIN OHEGA LAKE SERVICES ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING P N U ASSOCIATES, INC. P M U ASSOCIATES, INC. PALOMAR COHMUNICATIONS, PARTY PZAZZ PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS ¢EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (ENPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS ¢EMPLOYEE$~ RETIRE PERS ¢EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETZRE CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION LEGAL DISPLAY PA97-0030 ADVERTISEMENT/SPRING EGG HUNT DISPLAY ADS - CAPITAL PROJECTS RECRUITMENT AOS- HUMAN RES. RECRUITMENT ADS - HUMAN RES. PUB. HEARING NOTICE-PA97-0030 PUB. HEARING NOTICEoPA976-0033 PUB. HEARING NOTICESoPA97-0057 APR COFFEE SVCS FOR CITY HALL OLD TOteM MAINSTREET BILLBOARD ADDITIONAL CHARGES/1997 RODRUN APR gATER QUALITY MAINT-DK PND STREET MAINT-MAIN ST/RANCHO CA MAR CONSULTING SVCS-WHISENAND MAR CONSULTING SVCS-WHISENAND APR DISPATCH RADIO MOBILE SVCS BALLOONS FOR EMPLOYEE LUNCHEON 000246 PER REDE 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS-PRE 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR ACCOUNT NUMBER 001'120-999'5256 190-180-999-5254 001-165-999-5256 001-150-~9'5254 001-150-999-5254 001-161'999'5256 001-161-999'5256 001-161-999'5256 340-199-701-5250 280-199-999-5362 001-1270 190-180-999-5250 001-164-b01-5402 280-199-999-5248 165-199-999-5248 320-19~-999-5209 001-150-999-5265 001-2130 001-2390 165-2390 190-2390 191-2590 192-2390 193-2~90 194-2390 280-2390 300-2390 320-2390 330-2390 340-2390 001-2130 001-2590 165-Z~90 190-2390 191-2390 192-~90 1~-~90 1~-2390 280-2390 300-2390 320-2390 33O-239O 340-2390 ITEM AMOUNT 205.28 187.18 253.59 126.10 41.30 47.34 45.21 45.21 143.49 2,881.80 1,023.40- 800.00 1,480.00 1,582.35 1,582.35 600.00 55.49 185.15 15,731.58 153.81 3,084.76 11.05 27.~6 37~.28 174.68 391.35 110.36 292.08 128.39 367.67 150.20 69.76 .47 13.58 .05 .14 1.T7 .97 1.48 .46 .93 .93 2.09 CHECK AMOUNT 951.21 143.49 1,858.40 800.00 1,480.00 3,164.70 600.00 55.49 21,280.65 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENEC1JLA 04/17/97 13:09 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 42955 04/17/97 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T 001-2122 40.62 40.62 42956 04/17/97 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001o161-999-5230 42956 04/17/97 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-120-999-5230 10.7'5 58.00 42957 04/17/97 POTTER, VIVIAN REFUND: LIFEGUARD TRAINING 190-183-4982 75.00 75.00 42958 04/17/97 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING-MAR 42958 04/17/97 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PUBLIC NOTICES-PA96-0345 001-150-999-5254 001-161-999-5256 578.12 71.78 649,90 42959 04/17/97 000728 RAMSEY BACKFLOW & PLUMB VAR.SLOPE AREAS/BACKFLOW TESTS 193-180-999-5415 50.00 50.00 42960 04/17/97 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF RUBBER AODRESS & VICR STAMPS 42960 04/17/97 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF TAX 42960 04/17/97 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF OEPT SIGNS IN LOBBY-CITY HALL 42960 04/17/97 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF RE-PRINT-CITY COUNCIL PLATES 42960 04/17/97 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF TAX 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 340-199-701-5250 001-100-999-5220 001-100-999-5220 49.20 3.81 102.15 190.00 14.7'5 359.89 42961 04/17/97 000947 42961 04/17/97 000947 42962 04/17/97 000262 42962 04/17/97 000262 42962 04/17/97 000262 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 42963 04/17/97 RESSLER, MICHAEL 42963 04/17/97 RESSLER, MICHAEL 42964 04/17/97 001046 42964 04/17/97 001046 42965 04/17/97 000418 REXON, FREEDMAN, KLEPET REXON, FREEDMAN, KLEPET RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK & R 42966 04/17/97 000815 ROWLEY, CATHERINE 42966 04/17/97 000815 ROWLEY, CATHERINE 42967 04/17/97 000704 42967 04/17/97 000704 42967 04/17/97 000704 42967 04/17/97 000704 42967 04/17/97 000704 42967 04/17/97 000704 42967 04/17/97 000704 42967 04/17/97 000704 42968 04/17/97 000793 42969 04/17/97 002721 42969 04/17/97 002721 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL S K S, INC/INLAND OIL S K S, INC/INLAND OIL S K S, INC/INLANO OIL S K S, INC/INLAND OIL S K S, INC/INLAND OIL S K St INC/INLAND OIL S K S, INC/INLAND OIL SCANTRON-FPC CORPORATIO SHOOTER'S RETREAT SHOOTER~S RETREAT MISC. BLUEPRINTS & SUPPLIES BLUEPRINT COPIES FOR TCSD VARIOUS WATER METERS/MAR VARIOUS WATER METERS/MAR VARIOUS WATER METERS/MAR REIMB:FILM/POSTAGE-L.V.MALL REIMB:FILM/POSTAGE-L.V.MALL JAN 1997 PROF LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 1997 PROF LEGAL SERVICES APERTURE CARD DUPLICATION-MAR TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES SOFTWARE MAINT-5/1/97-4/30/98 BUSHNELL BINOCULARS-TEM.P.D. TAX 001-164-604-5268 190-180-999-5250 190-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 001-161-999-5220 001-161-999-5230 001-130-999-5247 001-130-999-5247 001-163-999-5220 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 001-164-601-5263 001-165-999-5263 001-163-999-5263 001-164-604-5263 001-110-999-5263 001-162-999-5263 190-180-999-5263 340-199-701-5263 320-199-~9-5211 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 10.85 62.23 539.84 110.39 681.29 11.76 1.47 70.00 286.75 5.00 360.00 300.00 406.48 88.61 126.06 22.45 54.26 137.79 385.67 60.90 680.00 390.00 30.2~ 1,331.52 13.23 356.75 5.00 dO. O0 1,282.22 680.00 42970 04/17/97 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR APR PEST CONTROL $VCS-ClTY HAL 340-199-701-5250 56.00 V 2 PAGE 8 O. 17 13:09 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 42970 42971 42971 42971 42971 42971 42972 42972 42972 42973 42973 42974 42975 42975 42975 42977 42978 42979 42980 42981 CHECK DATE 0~/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 VENDOR NUMBER 000519 000537 OOO537 000537 000537 000537 001987 001987 001987 0OO3O5 000305 0O2686 000825 000825 000825 001035 001035 000314 001403 OOO668 002350 000320 VENDOR HAME SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CAL1F EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL TARGET STORE TARGET STORE TECH MARKETING GRAPHICS TEMECULA CYCLES TEMECULA CYCLES TEMECULA CYCLES TENECULA ENVIRONMENTAL TEMECULA ENVIRONMENTAL TEMECULA VALLEY MUSEUM TEMECULA VALLEY SOCCER TIMMY D. PRODUCTIONS TOVEY/SHULTZ CONSTRUCTI TO~/NE CENTER STATIONERS CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION APR PEST CONTROL SVCS-T.C.C. 2-06-562-5295/RANCHO CA/MAR 2-01-202-7330/VARIOUS METERS 2-01-202-7603/ARTERIAL STLT 51-77-393-5125-01-000-4/H~ff-79 53-77-806-0790-01-000-6/C0SMIC CELLULAR PHONE FOR G. YATES CELLULAR PHONE FOR G. YATES TAX SUPPLIES FOR COMMUNITY CENTER MISC SUPPLIES - REC. CLASSES GRAPHIC DESIGN/LOGO-JULY 4, 97 4 HELMETS FOR POLICE DEPT. MOTOR TIE-DC~NS FOR POLICE DEP TAX TRASH HAULING SVCS-PUJOL ST CREDIT:SRVC DISCONTINUED 3/15 DRAW REQUEST FOR MUSEUM CONST. REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT P.A. SYSTEM/EASTER EGG HUNT REL.RETENTION-CITY HALL NODIF. OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PW ADMIN. 42982 04/17/97 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 42982 04/17/97 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO CDEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 42982 04/17/97 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (OEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 42982 04/17/97 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 OEF COMP 42982 04/17/97 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (OEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 42982 04/17/97 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (OEF. C 001065 OEF COMP 42982 04/17/97 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (OEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 42982 04/17/97 001065 U S C N /PEBSCO (OEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 42982 04/17/97 001065 U S C N /PESSCO (DEF. C 001065 OEF CONP 000389 00O389 000389 000389 000389 000389 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 42983 42983 42983 42983 U S C N /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR U S C N /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR U S C N /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR U S C N /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR U S C N /PEBSCO (ORRA) 000389 PT RETIR ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-184-999-5250 191-180-999-5319 192-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 001-150-999-5208 001-150-999-5208 001-150-999-5208 190-184-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5254 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 280-199-807-580~ 280-199-807-5804 210-190-808-5804 190-2900 190-18~-999-5370 210-2035 001-164-60~-5220 O01 - 2080 190-2080 192- 2080 193- 2080 194- 2080 280- 2080 300-2080 320-2080 3~0-2080 001-2160 165-2160 190-2160 193-2160 280-2160 3~0-2160 ITEM AMOUNT 36.00 104.29 18,332.23 12,306.34 143.00 73.08 129.00 152.50 21.82 56.00 134.64 150.00 499.80 55.80 43.06 445.08 333.81- 40,000.00 100.00 150.00 145,125.55 64.49 3,266.21 866.27 5.00 37.50 75.00 5.00 19.97 312.50 112.50 459.34 49.12 692.30 23.34 34.12 55.60 CHECK AMOUNT 92.00 30,958.94 303.32 190.64 150.00 598.66 111.27 40,000.00 100.00 150.00 145,125.55 64.49 4,699.95 1,313.82 VOUCHRE2 04/17/97 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 42984 42985 42985 42985 42985 42986 42987 42988 42989 42990 42990 42990 42990 42990 42990 13:09 CHECK DATE 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 04/17/97 VENDOR NUMBER 002396 000325 000325 000325 000325 002576 000339 002109 002741 002741 002741 002741 002741 002741 VENDOR NAME U.S. LONG DISTANCE, INC UNITED WAY UNITED WAY UNITED WAY UNITED WAY URBAN DESIGN STUDIO VARNER, MARC%A WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY WHITE CAP ZELLERBACH ZELLERBACH ZELLERBACH ZELLERBACH ZELLERBACH ZELLERBACH CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION LONG DISTANCE TELECOM PROVIDER 000325 UW 000325 U~ 000325 UW 000325 UW FEB PROF SVCS-AREAWIDE DESIGN REFUND: CONTRACTED CLASSES PUB:CA LEG SVC 97 MISC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES TAX PAPER SUPPLIES TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER 320-199-999-5208 001'2120 165'2120 190'2120 280'2120 001-161-999-5248 190-183-4982 001-120-999-5228 001-164-601-5218 330-1~-~99-5220 330-199-999-5220 330-199-999-5220 330-199-999-5220 330-1~-9~-5220 330-199-99~-5220 ITEM AMOUNT 1,101.68 101.80 2.50 17.00 2.70 981.50 18.00 135.00 18.35 850.00 800.40 85.00 134.51 2,550.00 197.63 CHECK AMOUNT 1,101 124.00 981.50 18.00 135.00 18.35 4,6 TOTAL CHECKS 425,370.87 12:02 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERlOOS PAGE FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LO~/NO0 SET ASIDE 190 COt4NUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IHPROVENENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPHENT AGENCY - C[P 320 /NFORNATION SYSTENS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES ANOUNT 58,777.48 20,455.57 31,394.28 367.99 43.68 213,564.65 26,023.69 16,~1.93 115.50 TOTAL 367,981.76 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 04/24/97 12:02 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 42293 04/21/97 0027"71 GREAT GRAPHICS & FRAMIN FRAMED AREA MAPS-POLICE DEPT 42293 04/21/97 002771 GREAT GRAPHICS & FRAMIN FRAMED AREA MAPS-POLICE DEPT 001-170-999-5292 001-170-999-5292 198.49 198.49- .OC 42991 04/18/97 002185 POSTMASTER - TEMECULA POSTAGE-RATES/CHARGES NOTICE 42992 04/18/97 000515 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER STAFF APPRECIATION 190-180-999-5230 001-140-999-5260 4,240.00 75.00 4,240.00 75.00 42994 04/21/97 002771 GREAT GRAPHICS & FRAMIN FRAMED AREA MAPS-POLICE DEPT 001-170-999-5292 198.49 198.49 42995 04/23/97 000308 TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIAT! SPONSORSHIP:FRONTIER DAYS 5/24 280-199-999-5264 42996 04/23/97 000314 TEMECULA VALLEY MUSEUM INSTALL FENCE & 5 MONTHS RENT 210-190-808-5804 10,000.00 848.00 10,000.00 8~8.00 42997 04/23/97 000669 LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES 42997 04/23/97 000669 LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES RVSD DIVISION MTG:4/2~ (5 REG) 001-100-999-5258 RVSO DIVISION MTG:4/2~ (5 REG) 001-110-999-5258 72.00 48.00 120.00 98310 04/18/97 OLD REPUBLIC TITLE 1ST TIME HOMEBYR:WILSON,ROBERT 43000 04/24/97 002780 ADAM'S ADVERTISING, INC BILLBOARD DISPLAY 43000 04/24/97 002780 ADAM'S ADVERTISING, INC BILLBOARD OISPLAY 43001 04/24/97 001916 ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIAT FEB DESIGN SERVS-PAVEMNT MGMT 165-199-999-5449 280-199-999-5362 280-199-999-5264 210-165-655-5802 43002 04/24/97 002143 BALL PARK MAINTENANCE PRO MOUND 190-183-999-5380 43002 04/24/97 002143 BALL PARK MAINTENANCE TAX 190-183-999-5380 43003 04/24/97 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER SR CTR BUILDING ELECT REPAIRS 190-181-999-5250 43003 04/24/97 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER CRC BUILDING ELECT REPAIRS 190-182-999-5250 43003 04/24/97 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER TWN COMM CTR ELECT REPAIRS 190-184-999-5250 43003 04/24/97 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER EXHAUST FAN REPAIR ~ CRC 190-182-999-5250 43003 04/24/97 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER CITY HALL - HVAC IMPROVEMENTS 340-199-701-5212 43003 04/24/97 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER CRC ELECTRICAL SERVS REPAIRS 190-182-999-5212 43003 04/24/97 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER TCSD ELECTRICAL SVCS FOR PARKS 190-180-999-5212 43003 04/24/97 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER CITY HALL - HVAC IMPROVEMENTS 340-199-701-5212 43004 04/24/97 BENTLEY, PATRICIA REFUND: TENNIS BEG/JUNIORS 190-183-4982 43005 04/24/97 0027'56 CAD WORKS PLOTTER FOR NEW SUB-STATION 001-170-999-5610 43005 04/24/97 002736 CAD WORKS HP LEGS AND ROLL FEED 001-170-999-5610 43005 04/24/97 002736 CAD WORKS TAX 001-170-999-5610 43006 04/24/97 CAL. CITY MGMT FOUNDATI PUB:GUIDELINES CC-CM RELATIONS 190-180-999-5228 43007 04/24/97 000638 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF CONS 3RD QTR-STRONG MOTION INSTRLIME 001-2280 43007 04/24/97 000638 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF CONS 3RD QTR-STRONG MOTION INSTRUME 001-2290 43007 04/24/97 000638 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF CONS 3RD QTR-STRONG MOTION INSTRUME 001-162-4229 43008 04/24/97 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER HARDWARE-REPAIR/INSTALL-SIGNS 001-164-601-5244 43008 04/24/97 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER STREET SIGNS & MISC HARDWARE 001-164-601-5244 43008 04/24/97 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CALCULATION ERROR ON INVOICE 001-164-601-5244 19,363.00 7,500.00 1,618.20 5,095.64 372.90 28.89 83.00 342.00 165.00 103.46 140.00 190.00 45.0O 341.21 24.00 2,?..35.00 422.00 205.92 13.00 2,242.65 1,161.41 170.20- 2,195.37 52.37 3.00 19,363.00 9,11° ~0 5,G 401.7~ 1,409.67 24.00 2,862.92 13.00 3,233.86 L, ,97 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 43009 43009 43010' 43011 43012 43O13 43014 43015 43016 43017 43017 43017 43019 43020 43021 43022 43023 43024 43024 43024 43024 43024 43024 43024 43024 43024 43024 43024 43024 43024 43025 12002 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24197 04/24/97 04/24/97 O4/24/97 04/24/97 04124197 04/24/97 04/24/97 002747 CHICAGO NAP CORPORATION 002747 CHICAGO MAP CORPORATION 001197 CHOCOLATE FLORIST, THE 001410 CITIZEN'S SCHOLARSHIP 001193 COMP USA, INC. 001275 COMPUSERVE, INC. 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET 002533 COUNTRY FRAMING 001320 CRO~E-PELLET]ER, JULIE 001009 D B X, INC. 001009 D B X, INC. 001009 D B X, INC. 001924 DMG/DAVID M. GRIFFITH & 001669 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO 000453 ECONOMICS PRESS, INC. T 000~4 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE ENNS, ELXZABETH 001056 EXCEL LANDSrAPE 000165 000165 000165 000165 000165 000165 000165 000165 000165 000165 000165 000165 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEOERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS~ INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS~ INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS~ INC. 002122 FIRST LINE CONSTRUCTION 002760 FOUR-SHER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION PRECISION NAPPING VER. 3.0 FREIGHT GIFT=PKGE FOR JUDGES & WINNERS C/S FUNDING 96-97 AWARD MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES INFORMATION SERVICES/JAN PURCHASE RAD%0 SYSTEM EQUIP. FRAMING OF 13 THANK YOU CERT. REIMB:CPRS CONF003/13-16/97 C/O~2-LA PAZ/SR?gS REL.RETENTION:LA PAZ/SR795 PAID RETENTION IN FULL CK42626 PROF SVCS-DIF STUDY RE-CYCLE PAINT & MISC SUPPLIES ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL PLAN CHECK SERVICES REFUND: GROWING GREAT ROSES APR LDSC NAINT-SPORTS PARK EXPRESS NAIL SERVICES EXPRESS NAIL SERVICES EXPRESS NAIL SERVICES EXPRESS NAIL SERVICES EXPRESS NAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS NAIL SERVICES EXPRESS NAIL SERVICES EXPRESS NAIL SERVICES EXPRESS NAIL SERVICES EXPRESS NAIL SERVICES EXPRESS NAIL SERVICES EXPRESS NAIL SERVICES CONCRETE INSTALL VET'S PARK AD FOR UNION TRIBUNE ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-171-999-5221 001-171-9~9-5221 190-183-999-5370 001-100-999-5267 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5228 320-1950 001-150-999-5265 190-180-999-5258 210-165-659-5804 210-2035 210-2035 001-1&0°999-5248 001-164-601-5218 001-162-999-5228 001-161-999-5250 190-18~-4982 190-180-999-5415 001-161-999-5230 190-180-999-5230 280-199-999-52~0 001-162-999-5230 001-140-~99-5230 001-140-99~-5230 001-120-999-5230 001-161-999-52.30 165-199-999-5250 001-150-999-5230 280-199-999-5230 320-199-999-57.30 001-120-999-5230 190-180-999-5212 280-1~-999-5270 ! TEN AMOUNT 49.00 4.00 210.00 4,000.00 206.28 9.95 13,165.95 532.29 8.75 916.33 8,638.60 8,638.60- 2,758.90 174.34 80.50 2,425.00 25. O0 1,950.00 9.69 50.67 8.93 54.99 32.07 17.86 9.69 41.77 34.14 9.69 9.69 8.93 8.93 2,800.00 716.25 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 53.00 210.00 4,000.00 206.28 9.95 13,165.95 532.29 8.75 916.33 2,758.90 174.34 80.50 2,425.00 25.00 1,950.00 297.05 2,800.00 716.25 VOUCHRE2 04/24/97 12:02 CITY OF TE#ECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 4302? 43028 43029 43029 43029 43O29 43029 43030 43031 43031 43031 43031 43032 43033 43033 43033 43034 43035 43035 43035 43036 4303? 43038 43038 43039 43040 43040 43041 43042 43043 43044 43045 CHECK DATE 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/9? 04/24/97 04/24/9? 04/24/97 04/24/9? 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04124/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/9? VENDOR NLMBER 002638 00018~ 00018~ 000184 00018~ 00018~ 000177 000177 000177 000177 000175 002129 002129 002129 001609 000186 000186 000186 002751 001517 002749 002749 002726 000695 001407 002695 000203 VENDOR NAME FRANK, IRWIN FUENTES, RICHARD G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA ' PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM GARCIA, KELLY GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFF% GREAT WEST CONTRACTORS, GREAT WEST CONTRACTORS, GREAT WEST CONTRACTORS, GREATER ALARM COMPANY, HANKS HARDWARE, INC. HANKS HARDWARE, INC. HANKS HARDWARE, INC. HANNON, ICRRAN A. HARGROVE, GINA HAYNES FIRE HAYNES FIRE HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCE HI-WAY SAFETY, INC. HI-WAY SAFETY, INC. INLAND EMPIRE BUSINESS INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTA INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN JOBS AVAILABLE, INC. ITEM DESCRIPTION pRODUCTION/MAILING-ROA NEWSLTR REFUND: MUSIC FOR TODDLERS 909 197-50?2:GENERAL USAGE 909 676-0783:GENERAL USAGE 909 676-6243:PALA COMM. PARK 909 694-435&:PALA COMM. PARK 909 695-356~:ALARM REFUND: TEEN JAZZ OFFICE SUPPLIES:SR CENTER OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR TEM POLICE OFFICE SUPPLIES:CSD OFFICE SUPPLIES ' B&S PUB:"IMPLE PERF MEAS IN GOVT" FEB PRGSS:FIRE STATION PRKVIEW FEB PRGSS:FIRE PRKVIEW C0~10 FEB RETENTION W/H:FIRE PRK1/IEW ALARM MONITORING- STORAGE UNIT SUPPLIES FOR TEN SIC~TE PARK TCSD MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES TCSD MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS REFUND: T~O DAY ART CAMP REFUND FEES: B97-0425 FIRE PLA REFUNO FEES: B97-0425 FIRE PLA EMP ASSIST PRGM PROGRAM PHOTO CELL LIGHTS FOR BARRICAD PHOTO CELL LIGHTS FOR BARRICAD SUB:MJM:IE BUS.JOURNAL 97/98 PUB:TRAFFIC MANUALS:PW POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS TEMP HELP 3/1'3/31 LEONARD RECRUITMNT AD:RECREATION COOR ACCOUNT NUMBER 280-199-999-5250 190-183-4982 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 190-183-4982 190-181-999-5220 001-170-999-5610 190-180-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 001-140-999-5228 210-190-626-5804 210-190-626-5804 210-2035 340-199-701'5250 190-18~-999-5305 190-180-999-5212 190-180-~-5212 190-183-999-5330 190-183-4982 001-171-4036 001-171-4037 001-150-999-5250 001-16~-601-5218 190-180-~-5242 280-199-999-5270 001-16~-602-5228 190-182-999-5212 001-162-999-5118 001-150-999-5254 ITEM AMOUNT 1,800.00 32.00 2,801.33 53.91 27.10 29.86 52.62 75.00 26.~ 10,57 44.82 73.52 24.00 165,634.75 3,613.53 16,924.83- 35.00 25.82 340.92 1,000.00 280.00 40.00 438.00 144.00 355.35 2,761.67 345.52 48.00 239.34 419.16 5~101.80 6~.80 CHECK AMOUNT 1,800.0C 32.00 2,96~.82 75.00 155.79 24.00 152,3 35.00 1,366.74 280.00 40.00 582.00 355.35 3,107.19 48.00 ~'~9.34 419.16 5,1P' ~q '2 ~7 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 43046 43047 43047 43048 43049 43050 43051 43052 43052 43052 43053 43054 43056 43057 43058 43059 43060 43060 43061 43061 43062 43063 43064 43065 43066 43066 4~um7 12:02 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NLIHBER MANE 04/24/97 0027~7 KELLY DISPLAY, INC. 04/24/97 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 04/24/97 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 04/24/97 04/24/97 002023 04/24/97 001282 04/24/97 002779 04/24/97 001406 04/24/97 001406 04/24/97 001406 04/24/97 001534 04/24/97 002187 04/24/97 002397 LANDMARK/CALIFORNIA STA 04/24/97 001891 LINFIELD SCHOOL 04/24/97 LOPEZ-SHAW, CASSANDRA 04/24/97 002632 MAIL BOXES ETC. 04/24/97 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV 04/24/97 002052 MAPLES & ASSOCIATES 04/24/97 002052 MAPLES & ASSOCIATES KETTERER, DONNA KING, WENDE KNORR SYSTEMS, INC IOJHNS, ALLIE KUSTOM S]GNALS, INC. K'USTOI4 SIGNALSo INC. KUSTON SIGNALSo INC. 04/24/97 002693 MATROB, ANDREA 04/24/97 002693 MATROB, ANDREA 04/24/97 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS, INC. 04/24/97 0008~3 MCDANIEL ENGINEERING CO 04/24/97 001205 MCOERMOTT, TIM K. 04/24/97 001290 MEYER, JOHN 04/24/97 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 04/24/97 00138~ MINUTEMAN PRESS 04/24/97 000228 0~/24/97 000228 04/24/97 000228 ITEM DESCR I PT I ON 10 AMERICAN FLAG BANNERS TEMP HELP W/E 04-06 EVANS TENP HELP W/E 04-06 EVANS REFUND: CONTRACTED CLASS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS MiSt POOL SUPPLIES C F: ASSEM. LOC. GOVT. COMM. 4/16/97 TRAFFIC STATISTICS COMPUTER FREIGHT TAX LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV AIR:MTG RE:TRANSPORTION:3/~-7 LAKE ELSINORE ANIMAL FR MAR 97 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVS FEB PRGSS PMT RETENTION PRIO/EW APR RENT INTERIM FIRE STATION REFUND: HAWAIIAN TAHITIAN APR MAIL DELIVERY TEMP HELP W/E 4/6 CASTILLO FRONT ST ASPHALT REPAIR WORK OVERLANO & COHM CTR ASPHALT ~K TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS NATION'S CITIZES ~EEKLY AD REP MAR ENG SERVS:WINCHESTER/I-15 AIR RE%MB:GFOA CF:6/1-4/97 ADVANCE:NTL TWN #TG:4/27'30/97 B/W CITY SEAL LTRHEAD/ENVELOPE TAX MOBIL CREDIT FINANCE CO 859-216-146-0 GAS FOR CITY VEH MOBIL CREDIT FINANCE CO 859-216-146-0 GAS FOR CITY VEH MOBIL CREDIT FINANCE CO 859-216-146-0 GAS FOR CITY VEN ACCOUNT NUMBER 280-199-999-5270 001-16~-999-5118 001-164-604-5118 190-18~-4982 190-1~-~9-5330 190-182-~-5250 001-110-~9-5258 001-1~-602-5610 001-164-602-5610 001-164-602-5610 001-110-~9-5258 001-172-999-5255 210-1035 001-171-999-5470 190-18~-4982 330-199-~-5230 001-164-604-5118 001-16,4-601-5402 001-164-601-5&02 190-1~-~9-5330 190-1R~-~-5330 001-100-~9-5250 280-199-602-5804 001-140-9~-5258 280-1~-~-5261 001-104-604-5222 001-164-604-5222 001-170-~9-5262 190-180-~-5263 001-161-~-5263 ITEM AMOUNT 1,643.06 49.92 282.88 59.00 212.50 127.17 249.24 3,000.00 15.00 233.66 597.00 871.56 16,924.83 600.00 22.00 115.50 574.00 1,587.42 3,246.26 436.80 336.00 77.58 107.56 349.00 350.00 296.02 22.94 117.40 7.95 37.71 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 1,6~3.06 332.80 59.00 212.50 127.17 249.24 3,248.66 597.00 871.56 16,924.83 600.00 22.00 115.50 574.00 4,833.68 77'.58 107.56 3~9.00 350.00 318.96 VOUCHRE2 O4/24/97 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 43067 43068 43068 43069 43070 43071 43072 43075 43075 43075 43075 43074 43074 43075 43075 43075 43076 43077 43078 43078 43078 43078 43078 43078 43078 43078 43078 43078 43078 43078 43078 43078 43078 43078 43078 43078 43078 43078 43078 43078 12:02 CHECK DATE 04/24/97 0~/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 O4/24/97 0/,/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 0~/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 0~/24/97 VENDOR NUMBER 000228 000437 000437 000230 002?70 001353 000233 002139 002139 002139 002139 002105 002105 002406 002406 002406 002297 001243 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 VENDOR NAME MOBIL CREDIT FINANCE CO MORELAND & ASSOCIATES MORELAND & ASSOCIATES MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES NAPM NATIONAL INFORMATION DA NELSON, SHAWN NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT OLD TC~dN TIRE & SERVICE OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE PACIFIC BUSINESS INTERI PACIFIC BUSINESS INTERI PACIFIC BUSINESS INTERI PACIFIC RELOCATION CONS PALMOUIST, MARY PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH CITY OF TEMEOULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION 859-216-146-0 GAS FOR CITY VEH 1996 AUDIT SERVICES TEMP HELP-MICHELLE BOARDMAN APR-JUN 97 CITYWIDE ASSESS SER MEMBERSHIP: VOLLMUTH,MARY NATIONAL ZIP COOE DIRECTORY REINB:CPRS CF:3/13-14/97 ADVERTISING SERVICES 3/16/97 PUBLIC HEARING:PA95-0127 PUBLIC NEARING: PA97-00~8 PUBLIC HEARING: PA97-0007 CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FIRE STATION OFFICE FURNITURE FREIGHT TAX MAR PROF SVC-ENTERTAINMENT CTR TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-162-999-5263 001-140-999-5248 001-140-999-5118 190-180-999-5370 001-140-999-5226 001-162-999-5228 190-180-999-5258 001-1170 001-161-999-5256 001-161-999-5256 001-161-999-5256 190-180-999-5214 001-162-999-5214 210-190-626-5610 210-190-626-5610 210-190-626-5610 280-1279 190-183-999-5330 001-162-999-5220 001-170-999-5610 001-161-999-5260 190-184-999-5212 001-161-999-5260 320-199-999-5221 001-120-999-5220 001-110-999-5260 190-183-999-5370 001-150-999-5260 001-162-999-5260 001-150-999-5261 001-140-999-5260 190-180-999-5301 001-110-999-5260 320-199-999-5221 190-180-999-5208 190-180-999-5220 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 001-170-999-5242 001-170-999-5242 ITEN AMOUNT 7.95 1,990.00 1,662.50 5,070.66 140.00 36.90 61.34 212.94 39.95 42.58 45.21 35.47 58.51 33,370.04 1,250.00 2,683.05 1,635.00 396.00 12.40 20.42 66.85 38.19 29.12 7.04 37.07 17.21 8.50 20.00 12.20 49.90 30.55 6.61 13.47 9.63 20.70 ~.91 14.97 8.36 19.90 21.42 CHECK AMOUNT 171.01 3,652.50 5,070.66 140.00 36.90 61.34 9~ ~8 37,303.09 1,635.00 396.00 4~.42 ~2 ~ ~7 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 43079 43079 43079 43079 43080 43081 43081 43081 43081 43081 43081 43081 43081 43081 43081 43081 43081 43081 4~U81 43081 43081 43081 43081 43081 43081 43081 43082 43082 43083 43084 43085 43086 43086 43087 43088 43089 4au89 12:02 CHECK DATE 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 0/,/24/97 VENDOR NUMBER 000580 000580 000580 000580 000254 002776 002776 002776 002776 002776 002776 002776 002776 002776 002776 002776 002776 002776 002776 002776 002776 002776 002776 002776 002776 002776 002776 002776 000947 000947 000907 000426 001592 000815 000815 001309 000~ 000704 000704 000704 VENDOR NAME PHOTO UORKS PHOTO WORKS PHOTO ~ORKS PHOTO ~ORKS PRESS-ENTERPRISE COIlPAN PRIME MATRIX PRIME MATRIX PRIME MATRIX PRIME MATRIX PRIME MATRIX PRIME MATRIX PRIME MATRIX PRIME MATRIX PRIME MATRIX PRIME MATRIX PRIME MATRIX PRIME MATRIX PRIME MATRIX PRIME MATRIX PRIME MATRIX PRIME MATRIX PRIME MATRIX PRIME MATRIX PRIME MATRIX PRIME MATRIX PRIME MATRIX PRIME MATRIX PRIME MATRIX RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C RANCHO CAR WASH RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL RIVERSIDE CO. INFORNATI RO~LEY, CATHERINE ROULEY, CATHERINE RUNKLE, KATHERINE RUSE, PHYLLIS S K S, INC/INLAND OIL S K S, INC/INLAND OIL S K S, INC/INLAND OIL S K S, INC/INLAND OIL CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES/SUPPLIES ADVERTISING SERVICES 3/16/97 909 202-4769:JS:MAR 909 202-420~:KL:MAR 909 202-4763:PB:NAR 909 202-4758:RR:MAR 909 205-4070:MJM:MAR 909 202-4770:RB:MAR SC-5001375-& JG 909 205-7826:GR:MAR SC-5001343-2 GY 909 202-4767:GT:MAR SC-5001379-6 JH SC-5001207-9 88 SC-5003835-5 B BLAZER SC-5001237-6 P~ MAINT SC-5001220-2 P~ MAINT 909 202-4756:SN:MAR 909 206-0992:BH:MAR 909 202-4755:CITY VAN:MAR SC-5001206-1HP 909 202-4764:KH:MAR 909 202-4752:SN:MAR 909 205-7877:TH:MAR 909 519-2136:TH:MAR BLUEPRINTS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL BLUEPRINTS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. MISC JANITORIAL SUPPLIES MAR EMERG. RADIO RENTAL TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS REFUND: MUSIC FOR YOUNG CHILD REIMB CPRS CONF:3/13-16/97 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-180-999-5301 001-163-999-5250 001-163-999-5250 001-161-999-5222 001-1170 001-100-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-110-999-5208 001-110-999-5208 001-120-999-5208 001-140-999-5208 001-150-9~9-5208 001-161-999-5208 001-163-999-5208 001-164-601-5208 001-164-601-5208 001-164-604-5208 001-164-601-5208 001-164-60~-5208 190-180-999-5208 190-180-999-5208 190-180-999-5208 190-180-999-5208 190-180-99~'5208 320-1~9-999-5208 320-1~9-999-5208 210-165-675-5802 210-165-640-5804 001-165-999-5214 190-180-9~9-5212 001-162-999-5238 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 190-183-4982 190-180-999-5258 001-164-601-5263 001-163-999-5263 001-165-999-5263 001-110-99~-526~ ITEM AMOUNT 22.79 8.36 7.31 16.55 157.50 51.01 52.56 29.13 67.84 129.44 43.70 32.78 43.64 178.79 33.17 146.43 47.35 64.61 155.73 63.49 71.23 36.67 30.06 37.04 54.79 107.65 35.46 33.87 54.40 98.91 5.00 64.54 141.41 120.00 720.00 36.66 414.51 136.20 59.60 29.48 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 55.01 157.50 1,546.64 153.31 5.00 64.54 141.41 8~0.00 64.00 36.66 VOUCHRE2 04/24/97 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 43089 43089 43089 43090 43091 43092 43093 43093 43093 43093 43093 43093 43093 43093 43094 43094 43094 43094 43094 43095 43095 43096 43096 43097 43098 43099 43099 43100 43100 43101 43102 43103 43103 43104 43105 12:02 CHECK DATE 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 O4/24/97 O4124/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 VENDOR NUMBER 000704 000704 000704 000278 0027'77 000374 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 OO1212 001212 001212 001212 001212 000291 000291 002453 002453 000307 00O668 002?69 000320 000320 000978 00O459 VEHDOR NAME S K S, INC/INLAND O%L S K S, INC/INLAND OIL S K S, INC/INLAND OIL SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE SOLTYSIAK, RICH SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CONP SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T SUPER SEER CORPORATION SUPER SEER CORPORATIOH TEMECULA TROPHY CO. TEMECULA VALLEY HIGH SC TEMECULA VALLEY LITTLE TEMECULA VALLEY LITTLE TEMECULA VALLEY SOCCER TEMECULA VALLEY SOCCER TINNY D. PRODUCTIONS TODD'S FENCING TO, HE CENTER STATIONERS TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS TRAUMA INTERVENTION PRO TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS/G CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES RECRUITMNT AD:DEV PROC COORD REIMB:CF:PLANNERS INST.3/12-14 ADD'T COST:TRAFFIC SIGNAL WINC 2-03-464-4989 MEADOWS PRK %RRG 2-02-351-5281 RANCHO VISTA A 2-07-626-6063 RANCHO VISTA SPR 2-02-351-6800 VARIOUS METERS 2-05-791-8807 VARIOUS METERS 2-05-791-8807 VARIOUS METERS 2-05-791-8807 VARIOUS METERS 2-O4-792-9005 RANCHO CA SPT PK 021-725-0775 SR CENTER 101-525-0950 PUJOL ST 133-O40-7~73 CITY HALL 095-167-7907 FIRE STATION 091-024-9300 CRC TCSD VEHICLE MAIHT & REPAIR TCSD VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR PARTS FOR HEL#ET'TEN.P.D. FREIGHT AWARDS:SWING & JITTERBUG DANCE REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND: KEY DEPOSIT REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND: KEY/SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND: KEY/SECURITY DEPOSIT MUSIC: TEEN FEST DANCE 4/5/97 RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEMENT PROG. MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES/FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES / FINANCE 3RD FY QTR CITIZEN EMERG RES TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-162-999-5263 190-180-999-5263 340-199-701-5263 001-150-999-5254 001-161-999-5272 280-199-602-5804 193-180-999-5240 190-182-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5240 190-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5240 190-181-999-5240 190-184-999-5240 ~40-199-701-5240 001-171-999-5240 190-182-999-5240 190-180-999-5214 190-180-999-5214 001-170-999-5243 001-170-999-5243 190-18~-999-5370 190-2900 190-2900 190-2900 190-1~-4~0 190-2900 190-183-999-5320 165-199-813-58O4 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-171-999-5274 190-183-999-5330 ITEM AMOUNT 148.39 354.11 58.60 297.36 375.11 587.00 14.40 3,688.18 15.36 44.40 381.11 13.92 323.59 1,424.66 79.22 39.52 32.85 27.96 1,207.34 2~.99 24.99 10.00 3.16 269.30 100.00 70.00 80.00 100.00 40.00 150.00 1,058.43 101.82 12.69 1,312.50 533.58 CHECK AMOUNT 1,200.89 297.36 375.11 587.00 5,905.62 1,386.89 48.98 13.16 269.30 100.00 150.00 140.00 150.00 1,058.43 114.51 1,3 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 43105 43106 43106 43107 43107 43107 43107 43107 43107 43107 43107 43107 43108 43109 43110 43111 12:02 CHECK DATE 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/9? 04/24/9? 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 04/24/97 VENDOR NUMBER 000459 000326 000326 002566 002566 002566 002566 002566 002566 002566 002566 002566 001209 001437 001342 001:542 001342 002778 VENDOR NAME TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS/G UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS VALLEY MZCRO COMPUTERS VALLEY MXCRO COMPUTERS VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS VAULT INC., THE VIRACK, MARYANN WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WEBSTER, ANDY CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERlOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS UNIFORM MAINT. FOR TCSD FLOOR NAT RENTAL - T.C,C. INTEL PENTIUM- COMPUTER 166 TAX INTEL 166 MHZ CONPUTER INTEL PENTIUM- 166 MHZ TAX HP LASERJET PRINTER TAX INTEL 166 NHZ CONPUTER TAX DATA STORAGE - CARTRIDGE CTR TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINT.SUPPLIES-T.C.C. BUILDING MAINT. $UPPLIES-CRC REIMB:CF:PLANNERS INST,3/12-14 ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-1~-~-5330 190-180-999-5243 190-18~-999-5250 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-170-9~-5610 001-170-~9-5610 001-170r~-5610 001-170-~-5610 001-120-999-5277 190-183-999-5330 340-199-702-5212 190-184-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 001-161-999-5272 ITEM AMOUNT 400.00 101.34 66.28 1,987.95 154.07 1,987.95 62.05 158.88 2,295.00 177.86 1,987.95 154.07 240.75 240.00 189.33 217.27 341.27 137.72 PAGE 8 CHECK AMOUNT 933.58 167.62 8,965.78 240.75 240.00 747.87 137.72 TOTAL CHECKS 367,981.76 16:46 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 12 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LCN/MOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES TCSO OEBT SERVICE AMOUNT 121,379.40 19,824.26 32,071.18 67.65 146.80 5,371.74 1,063.33 124,855.69 84,741.55 6,026.32 3,860.55 886.54 8,594.43 2,224.80 TOTAL 411,114.24 VOUCHRE2 05/01/97 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 43112 43113 122000 701916 701916 701916 701916 701916 701916 701916 701916 701916 701916 701916 701916 777454 777454 777454 777454 777454 777454 777454 77'7454 777454 777454 777454 777454 777454 77?454 777454 777454 777454 777454 7"/'7454 777454 777454 777454 777454 7-/7454 793452 793452 793452 793452 793452 793452 793452 16:46 CHECK DATE 04/28/97 04/28197 04/28/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 VENDOR NUMBER 000879 000434 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 OO0444 00044~ 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000283 000283 000283 00028~ 000283 000283 000283 000283 00028~ 000283 000283 000283 000283 00028~ 000283 000283 000283 000283 00028~ 000283 000283 000283 000283 00028~ 00O444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 00O444 VENDOR NAME RADISSON HOTEL - VISALI SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS CHICAGO TITLE CO.,INLAN INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTAT/O( (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EO0) INSTAT/O{ (EDD) I#STATAX (EDO) INSTATAX (EO0) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX ¢EDD) INSTATAX CEOD) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTAT/O((IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX CIRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) IHSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) ]NSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTAT/O( (IRS) INSTAT/O((IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTAT/iX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTAT/O((EDD) INSTAT/O( (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTAT/O( (EDD) INSTATAX (EO0) INSTATAX (EDO) INSTATAX (EDD) CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION HTL:SIERRA CF H.OSVOLD 4/30 CF:SIERRA 4/30-5/2 H.OSVOLD 1ST TIME BYER PRG:SAVALA,D&N 1ST QTR 1997 Ul & ETT TAX EMPLOYEES STATE PR TAXES EMPLOYEES STATE PR TAXES EMPLOYEES STATE PR TAXES EMPLOYEES STATE PR TAXES EMPLOYEES STATE PR TAXES EMPLOYEES STATE PR TAXES EMPLOYEES STATE PR TAXES EMPLOYEES STATE PR TAXES EMPLOYEES STATE PR TAXES EMPLOYEES STATE PR TAXES EMPLOYEES STATE PR TAXES 00028~ FEDERAL 00028~ FEDERAL 00028~ FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 00028~ FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 00028~ FEDERAL 00028~ FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEOERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 MEDICARE 00028~ MEO1CARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEOICARE 000283 MEOICARE 000283 MEDICARE 00028~ MEDICARE 000283 MEOICARE 00028~ MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000444 SDI 000444 SOl 000444 SDI 000444 SOl 000444 SOl 000444 SOl O0{)X~ STATE ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-161-999-5261 001-161-999-5261 165-199-999-5449 001-2350 165-2350 190-2350 191-2350 192-2350 193-2350 194-2350 280-2350 300-2350 320-2350 330-2350 340-2350 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 193-2070 280-2070 340-2070 001-2070 ITEM AMOUNT 82.50 275.00 18,600.00 17,722.06 229.67 5,123.53 12.25 33.40 598.52 210.02 473.60 122.49 244.99 202.50 674.03 15,185.75 158.85 3,598.05 8.92 22.13 342.83 138.30 339.76 132.05 415.63 132.68 224.93 3,695.09 55.80 1,003.09 2.38 6.10 94.97 38.79 95.87 23.86 66.56 34.52 105.09 43.87 4.59 52.85 1.56 2.94 3.52 4,098.36 CHECK AMOUNT 82.50 275.00 18,600.00 25,6~7.06 25,922.00 ~ '2 G. ~7 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 793452 793452 793452 793452 793452 793452 793452 793452 793452 793452 793452 970430 43116 43117 43117 43117 43117 43~17 43118 43119 43119 43119 43119 43119 43119 43120 43120 43121 43122 43123 43123 43123 43123 43123 43123 43123 43123 16:46 CHECK DATE 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 04/30/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 VENDOR NUMBER 000444 000444 0004~+4 000444 00C~4.44 000444 00044~+ 000444 00{34.44 000444 000444 000166 0005~ 000116 000116 000116 000116 000116 000116 000116 002410 000106 000106 000106 000106 000106 000106 001281 001281 000102 000936 000101 000101 000101 000101 000101 000101 000101 000101 000475 VENDOR NAME INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTAT/O( (EDD) INSTAT/O( (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDO) INSTATAX ¢EDD) INSTATAX (EO0) INSTATAX CEDO) INSTATAX (EDD) FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO A F JOHNSON CO., INC. A V P VISION PLANS A V P VISION PLANS A V P VISION PLANS A V P VISION PLANS A V P VISION PLANS A V P VISION PLANS A V P VISION PLANS A WOMAN'S TOUCH BUILDIN ALFAX WHOLESALE FURNITU ALFAX WHOLESALE FURNITU ALFAX WHOLESALE FURNITU ALFAX WHOLESALE FURNITU ALFAX WHOLESALE FURNITU ALFAX WHOLESALE FURNITU ALHAMBRA GROUP ALHAMBRA GROUP AMERICAN FENCE CO. OF C AMERICAN RED CROSS APPLE ONE, INC. APPLE ONE, INC. APPLE ONE, INC. APPLE ONE, INC. APPLE ONE, INC. APPLE ONE, INC. APPLE ONE, INC. APPLE ONE, INC. B N I PUBLICATIONS, INC CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION OOOZ~ STATE 000~ STATE 000~ STATE 000/~ STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE OOD~ STATE 0004~g. STATE 00044~ STATE 000444 STATE 0004A~ STATE ACGUISITION-WINCH.CREEK PARK RAIN GEAR FOR PW 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP JANITORIAL SVC-CITY PARKS-APR SMALL DESK FOR AQUATIC OFFICE FREI GHT TAX MOBILE AV CART FOR T.C.C. FRE 1GHT TAX DESIGN SERVICES FOR ADA PARK PROF SVCS-PED.BRIDGE-SPORTS PK SECURITY FENCE-PUJOL ST-APRIL LIFEGUARD TRAINING SUPPLIES TEMP HELP W/E 1/22 J.BARNETT TE#P HELP WE 1/18 J.BARNETT TE#P HELP W/E 1/22 J.YONKER TEMP HELP W/E 4/5 J.YONKER TEMP HELP W/E 4/5 J.COMYNS TEMP HELP W/E 4/5 C.CERASAN! TEMP HELP W/E 4/12 J.YONKER TE#P HELP W/E 4/5-12 J.CONYNS BOOK:PW CONSTR & CAL/OAHA CAL ACCOUNT NUMBER 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 210-190-149-5804 001-164-601-5218 001-2510 165-?.310 190-2310 193-?.310 280-2510 300-?.310 340-2310 190-180-999-5250 190-182-999-5220 190-182-999-5220 190-182-999-5220 190-18~-999-5242 190-18/,-999-5242 190-184-999-5242 210-190-148-5802 210-190-137-5802 165-199-812-5804 190-183-999-5320 001-161-999-5118 001-110-999-5118 001-140-~F}-5118 001-140-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 001-110-999-5118 001-1&0-999-5118 001-161-9~-5118 001-164-604-5228 ITEM AMOUNT 53.48 802.03 1.63 3.80 67.53 24.11 108.90 40.43 103.63 38.30 30.48 17,7'74.72 527.46 487.74 8.60 64.90 .52 18.94 4.30 17.20 1,374.00 179.00 39.00 12.98 249.00 59.00 18.05 46~.47 2,150.00 44.00 234.00 ?2.24 288.96 516.00 464 .&O 54.18 54.18 496.65 252.84 109.51 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 5,482.01 17,774.72 527.46 602.20 1,374.00 557.03 2,618.47 44.00 23~.00 2,199.45 109.51 VOUCHRE2 05/01/97 VOUCHER/ OHECK NUMBER 43125 43126 43126 43126 43127 43127 43127 43128 43129 43130 43130 43131 43131 43132 43132 43132 43132 43132 43132 43132 43132 43132 43132 43133 43134 43135 43135 43135 43135 43135 43135 43136 43137 43138 43138 43139 43139 16:46 CHECK DATE 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 VENDOR NUMBER 002720 00267'7 002677' 002677 000622 000622 000622 000402 000126 000131 000131 000135 000135 000140 000140 000140 000140 000140 000140 000140 000140 000140 000140 002405 002533 001014 001014 001014 001014 001014 001014 002106 001393 001393 000155 000155 VENDOR NAME BAKER, R.W. BANNER MATTRESS BANNER MATTRESS BANNER MATTRESS BANTA ELECTRIC-REFR[GER BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER BANTA ELECTRIC-REFR]GER BERG, MARK CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA CARL WARREN & CO., INC. CARL WARREN & CO., INC. CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COHPUTER PROTECTION TEC COUNTRY FRAMING COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS CUB SCOUT PACK #301 DA FAMILY SUPPONT DATA TICKET, INC. DATA TICKETw INC. DAVLIN DAVLIN CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION DWARF FESCUE FOR PARKVIEW FIRE MATTRESS/BX SPRG PRK~q~ STATION FREI GHT TAX ELECTRICAL SERVICES FOR CRC TCSD ELECTRICAL SRVC FOR PARKS TCSD ELECTRICAL SVCS FOR PARKS REIMB:ICBO NECH INSPECTOR CERT LDSC IMPROVEMENTS-VETERANS PRK HEMME, ROBERT 07/24/95 LOCKHEED, HARTIN 03/21/96 STREET SIGNS & MISC HARDWARE CREDIT:ERROR IN INVOICE TOTAL 000140 600 A&S 000140 600 A&S 000140 800 A&S 000140 800 A&S 000140 800 A&S 000140 CANCER 000140 CANCER 000140 CANCER 000140 CANCER 000140 CANCER ANNUAL MAINTENANCE DELTEC UPS FRAMED VALUE STATEMENT REFURBISH PARK MONUMENT SIGNS REFURBISH PARK MONUMENT SIGNS REFURBISH PARK MONUMENT SIGNS REFURBISH PARK MONUMENT SIGNS REFURBISH PARK MONUMENT SIGNS REFURBISH PARK MONUMENT SIGNS REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 002106 SUPPORT FEB & MAR PRKING CIT PROCESSIN FEB & HAR PRKING CIT PROCESSIN TAPING OF COUNCIL MTG-3/25/97 TAPING OF PLANNING COMM. MTG ACCOUNT NUMBER 210-190-626-5804 210-190-626-5610 210-190-626-5610 210-190-626-5610 190-182-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 001-162-999-5261 190-180-999-5415 300-199-999-5207 300-199-999-5207 001-164-601-5244 001-164-601-5244 001-2330 190-2330 001-2330 190-2330 193-?.330 001-2330 165-2330 190-2330 193-2330 280-2330 320-199-999-5215 001-110-999-5220 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-2900 190-2140 001-140-999-5250 001-170-999-5250 001-100-999-5250 001-161-999-5250 ITEM AMOUNT 1,500,00 1,990.00 52.00 154.23 45.00 104.00 99.00 45.00 485.30 1,550.83 352.15 123.56 8.29- 39.7S 39.75 66.50 65.56 .94 148.21 12.94 56.17 1.59 12.94 2,300.00 95.29 308.40 570.90 308.40 308.40 308.40 308.40 100.00 100.00 107.00 107.00 807.11 150.00 CHECK AMOUNT 1,500.00 2,196.~ 248.00 45.00 485.30 1,902.98 115.27 ~4.35 2,300.00 95.29 2,112.90 100.00 100.00 PAGE 4 16:46 VOU=HER/ CHECK NUMBER 43139 43140 43141 43142 43142 43142 43142 43142 43143 43144 43144 43144 43144 43145 J w~46 43146 43146 43147 43148 43148 43148 43148 43148 43148 43148 43148 43148 43148 43148 43148 43148 43148 43148 43148 43148 43148 43148 43148 CHECK DATE 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 VENDOR NUMBER 000155 002744 000156 000156 000156 000156 000156 002060 001056 001056 001056 001056 00047B 000165 000165 000165 000165 002265 002002 002002 002002 002002 002002 OO2OO2 002002 002002 002002 002002 002002 002002 002002 DO2002 002002 DO2002 002002 002002 DO2002 002002 002002 002002 002002 VENDOR NAME DAVLIN DE LAMAR ENTERPRISES, I DEAKINS, RUTH DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA OENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA EUROPEAN DELl & CATERIN EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANOSCAPE FAST SIGNS FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FIRST TRUST OF CALIFORN FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTZS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION TAPING OF COUNCIL MTG-4/8/97 SEC.ACCESS SYS-NEW MAINT.FAC. REFUND:PARK RENTAL 000156 DENT-REV 000156 DENTICAR 000156 DEN-AMIN 000156 OENT-ADV 000156 DENTICAR REFRESHMENTS-COUNCIL MTG-4/22 LDSC REPAIRS - SPORTS PARK LDSC NAINTENANCE-SPORTS PARK LDSC REPAIRS - SOLANA WAY LDSC MAINTENANCE-gINCN.CREEK VEHICLE SIGNS FOR TCSD EXPRESS NAIL SERVICES EXPRESS NAIL SERVICES EXPRESS NAIL SERVICES EXPRESS NAIL SERVICES TCSD BOND ADMIN FEES-END 10/1 002002 LIFE INS 002002 LIFE INS 002002 LIFE INS 002002 LIFE INS 002002 LIFE INS 002002 LIFE INS 002002 LIFE INS 002002 LIFE INS 002002 LIFE INS 002002 LIFE INS 002002 LIFE ]NS 002002 LIFE INS 002002 LTD DO2002 LTD 002002 LTD 002002 LTO 002002 LTD 002002 LTD 002002 LTD 002002 LTD 002002 LTD 002002 LTD 002002 LTD ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-100-999-5250 210-190-144-5804 190-183-4988 001-1180 001-2.~0 001-2340 001-1180 001-2340 001-100-999-5260 190-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5214 001-120-999-5230 165-199-999-5250 001-162-999-5230 280-199-999-52__30 390-199-999-5227 001-2360 165-2360 190-2360 191-2360 192-2360 193-2360 194-2360 280-2360 300-2360 320-2360 330-2360 340-2360 001-2380 165-2380 190-2380 191-2380 192-2380 19~-2380 194-2380 280-2380 300-2380 320-2380 330-2380 ITEM AMOUNT 855.11 27,983.00 30.00 8.81- 8.81 15.00 8.81 8.81 128.27 246.97 682.00 175.24 60.00 60.08 8.93 15.56 51.58 13.77 2,224.80 598.41 4.25 124.11 .43 1.28 16.16 8.90 13.60 4.24 8.50 8.50 19.12 1,090.80 11.41 225.12 .82 2.05 28.12 12.94 29.00 8,05 21.65 9.26 CHECK AMOUNT 1,812.22 27,983.00 30.00 32.62 128.27 1,16~.21 60.08 89.84 2,224.80 VOUCHRE2 05/01/97 16:46 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 43148 43148 43148 43148 43148 43148 43148 43148 43148 43148 43148 43148 43148 43148 43150 43150 43150 43151 43152 43153 43153 43153 43154 43154 43154 43155 43155 43155 43156 43156 43156 43156 43156 43156 43156 43156 43156 43156 43156 43157 43157 43157 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 0S/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 002002 002002 002002 002002 002002 002002 002002 002002 002002 002002 002002 002002 002002 002002 000643 000643 000643 00018~ 000184 00018/, 001164 001164 001164 001937 001937 001937 000177 000177 000177 000177 000177 000177 000177 000177 000177 000177 000177 002689 002689 002689 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD FORTIS BENEFITS 1NS. CO 002002 STD FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO MAY FLAMMER-LZFE/DIS INS FORTNER HARDHARE, INC. FORTNER HARDWARE, INC. FORTHER HARDWARE, INC. FOUNDATION FOR THE CTFE FULLY PERSUADED CHURCH G T E CALIFORN%A - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM GABRIEL, RICHARD GABRIEL, RICHARD GABRIEL, RICHARD GALLS, INC. GALLS, INC. GALLS, INC. GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLE#NIES OFFICE PROOUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT HANDS LABOR SERVICES HANDS LABOR SERVICES HANDS LABOR SERVICES TCSD MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/MAR TCSD MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/MAR STREET MAINT. SUPPLIES-MARCH 97 OLDER WKR RECOG:JK,RP,GY,AC SETTLMNT CLAIM NO. 97-211 909 506-2626 POLICE DEPT 909-699-2575/PUBLIC WORKS 909-699-7945/CRC F. ALARM-APR MAY LEASE FOR CITY MAINT YARD MAY LEASE FOR CITY MAINT YARD MAY LEASE FOR CITY MAINT YARD INSTALL POWER SUPPLY INSTALL POllER SUPPLY FREIGHT OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT OFFICE SUPPLIES - CITY MGR OFFICE SUPPLIES/PLANNING OFFICE SUPPLIES / PLANNING MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES-TEM.P.D. MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES-TEM.P.D. MISC. SUPPLIES-NEW SUB-STATION MISC. SUPPLIES-NEW SUB-STATION MISC. SUPPLIES-NEW SUB-STATION OFFICE SUPPLIES / PLANNING CREDIT: MISC. SUPPLIES TEMP HELP W/E 3/30 L.WALTERS TENP HELP W/E 3/30 L.WALTERS TEMP HELP W/E 4/6 L.WALTERS 3~0-2380 001-2500 165-2500 190-2500 191-2500 192-2500 193-2500 194-2500 280-2500 300-2500 320-2500 330-2500 3~0-2500 001-1170 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 001-164-601-5218 001-150-999-5260 300-199-999-5207 001-170-999-5610 001-164-601-5208 320-199-999-5208 001-164-601-5254 001-162-999-52~4 190-1990 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5220 001-110-999-5220 001-161-999-5220 001-161-999-5220 001-170-999-5220 001-170-999-5220 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-161-999-5220 001-161-999-5220 001-161-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 001-161-9~9-5118 26.22 1,187.04 12.07 238.16 .87 2.17 29.73 13.70 30.69 8.52 22.91 9.80 27.75 22.08 43.00 5.50 35.67 160.00 209.04 844.89 42.01 50.67 440.00 88.00 352.00 159.99 129.98 12.99 20.02 85.93 267.65 25.80 40.21 40.21 159.13 1,000.00 348.66 61.20 234.19- 98.92 47.16 109.56 3,878.43 84.17 16n ~ 2c 937.57 880. O0 302.96 1,814.62 25. ' ~2 PAGE 6 L. 97 16046 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 43158 05/01/97 002753 43159 05/01/97 43160 05/01/97 001644 43161 05/01/97 002098 43162 05/01/97 000?96 43163 05/01/97 000194 43163 05/01/97 000194 43163 05/01/97 000194 43163 05/01/97 000194 43163 05/01/97 000194 43164 05/01/97 0027~26 43165 05/01/97 000199 S 05/01/97 4al67 05/01/97 002772 43168 05/01/97 001667 43168 05/01/97 001667 43169 05/01/97 000206 43170 05/01/97 001534 43171 05/01/97 002735 43171 05/01/97 002735 43171 05/01/97 002735 43172 05/01/97 001967 43173 05/01/97 000220 43174 05/01/97 002752 43174 05/01/97 002752 43173 05/01/97 43176 05/01/97 001905 43177 05/01/97 001892 43177 05/01/97 001892 05/01/97 002558 VENDOR NAME HAR-BRO, INC. HEMET/TEMECULA E.A.C. HILLCREST CONTRACTING, HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES ICBO I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS INLAND EMPIRE BUSINESS INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC JOSEPH, MICHELLE KELLY BLUE BOOK KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE KINKO~S, INC. LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV LEGAL BOOKS D]STRIBUTIN LEGAL BOOKS D]STRIBUTIN LEGAL BOO!(S DISTRIBUTIN MANPOgER TEMPORARY SERV MAURICE PRINTERS, INC. MCLEAN, BARBARA MCLEAN, BARBARA MCM[LLIN PROJECT SERVIC MEYERS, DAVID WILLIAM NOBI LE MDOULAR MOBILE MODULAR NE~S/SPORTS MICRO~AVE R CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERI(OS ITEM DESCRIPTION MINDO~ SEALER AT FIRE ST ~ NEMBERSHIP:G.YATES 1997 FY94-95 P.C.C. REPAIR PROGRAM MOTORCYCLE REPAIRS-POLICE DEPT 97 MEMBERSHIP:ELMO:ORANGE CHPT 000194 DEF CUMP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COHP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP SUBSCR I PT ION: THORNH ILL :2YRS 000199 IRS GARN REFUND: PARK RENTAL KELLY BLUE BOOK USED CAR GUIDE TEMP HELP I~/E 4/13 J.EVANS TEMP HELP W/E 4/13 J.EVANS MISC. RECREATION SUPPLIES AIR: ICMA CF:BRADLEY:9/14-17/97 ~97 *"CA LA~ RELATING TO MINOR FREIGHT TAX TEMP HELP W/E 4/13 J.CASTILLO (500) BLANK STOCK PARCHMENT CONSULTANT:CITY MANAGER'S DEPT WORKERS~ COMP FOR 4/]'-4/18 REFUND:BUSINESS LICENCE FEE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS APR INTERIM FIRE STATION LEASE APR INTERIM FIRE STATION LEASE RENTAL-TRANSMITTER-COUNCIL MTG ACCOUNT NUMBER 210-190-626-5804 001-150-999-5226 001-164-601-5402 001-170-999-5214 001-162-999-5226 001-2080 165-2080 190-2080 193-2080 280-2080 001-161-999-5228 001-2140 190-183-4988 001-170-999-5228 001-16~-999-5118 001-164-604-5118 190-180-999-5222 001-110-999-5258 001-170-999-5228 001-170-9~-5228 001-170-999-5228 001-164-60~-5118 001-120-999-5220 280-199-999-5250 001-1182 001-1990 190-18~-999-5330 001-171-999-5470 001-171-999-5470 001-100-999-5250 ITEM AMOUNT 236.08 20. O0 4,653.44 20.00 25.00 1,963.19 12.50 669.47 9.64 49.82 48. O0 297.49 30.00 52.00 60.84 344.76 38.47 220.06 139.75 7.50 10.8~ 459.20 18.32 105.00 1.80- 35.00 288. O0 975.14 738.09 538.75 CHECK AMOUNT 2~6.08 20.00 4,653.44 20.00 25.00 2,704.62 48.00 297.49 30.00 52.00 405.60 38.47 220.06 158.08 459.20 18.32 103.20 35.00 288.00 1,713.23 538.75 e¢ VOUCHRE2 05/01/97 16:46 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 43179 43179 43179 42179 43180 43181 43181 43181 43182 43182 43182 43182 43182 43182 43182 43182 43182 43182 4318~ 43183 43183 43183 43183 43183 43183 43183 43183 CHECK DATE 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 VENDOR NUMBER 002105 002105 002105 002105 002216 002781 002781 002781 002781 002781 002781 002781 002781 002781 002781 001880 001880 001880 00188O 001880 0018,80 001880 001880 001880 VENDOR NAHE OLD TCY~N TIRE & SERVICE OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE OLD TC~N TIRE & SERVICE P F C UNLIMITED PADRE & SONS LANDSCAPIN PADRE & SONS LANDSCAPIN PADRE & SONS LANDSCAPIN PEDAL TECH PEDAL TECH PEDAL TECH PEDAL TECH PEDAL TECH PEDAL TECH PEDAL TECH PEDAL TECH PEDAL TECH PEDAL TECH PELI GUARD PRODUCTS PELf GUARD PRODUCTS PELf GUARD PRODUCTS PELI GUARD PRODUCTS PELf GUARD PRODUCTS PELI GUARD PRODUCTS PELf GUARD PRODUCTS PELI GUARD PRODUCTS PELf GUARD PRODUCTS CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION NEW TIRES FOR PUBLIC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & REPAIR VEHICLE MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & REPAIR PARK MAINT-R.V. TOT LOT REFUND:PATIO PERMIT B96-0918 REFUND:PATIO PERMIT B96-0918 REFUND:PATIO PERMIT B96-0918 POLICE BICYCLE ID# U61203319 TAX POLICE BICYCLE ID# U61100888 TAX POLICE BICYCLE ID# U61203338 TAX POLICE BICYCLE ID# U61203296 TAX POLICE BICYCLE ID# U61203305 TAX UNIFORMS FOR AQUATICS UNIFORMS FOR AQUATICS UNIFORMS FOR AQUATICS UNIFORMS FOR AOUATICS UNIFORMS FOR AOUATICS UNIFORMS FOR AQUATICS UNIFORMS FOR AQUATICS FREIGHT TAX 43184 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 43184 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 43184 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 4318~ 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 43184 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 43184 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 43184 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 43184 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 43184 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PER$ RET 43184 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES, RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 43184 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES, RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 43184 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 43184 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES, RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 43184 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESv RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 43184 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 43184 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 43184 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 43184 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 43184 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-164-601-5214 001-163-999-5214 190-180-999-5214 001-16~-601-5214 190-180-999-5212 001-2290 001-162-4200 001-162-4285 001-170-999-5610 001-170-~9-5610 001-170-~-5610 001-170-~-5610 001-170-~-5610 001-170-~-5610 001-170-~9-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-170-9~-5610 001-170-~-5610 190-1~-9~-5310 190-1~-~9-5310 190-1~-~-5310 190-1~-~9-5310 190-1~-999-5310 190-1g-999-5310 190-1~-~9-5310 190-1~-~-5310 190-1~-~-5310 001-2130 001-2390 165-2390 190-2130 190-2390 191-2390 192-2390 193-2390 194-2390 280-2130 280-2390 300-2390 320-2390 330-2390 340-2390 001-2130 001-2390 165-2390 190-2390 ITEM AHOUNT 1,656.26 388.99 15.95 48.64 43.10 .50 21.75 29.00 1,206.90 84.25 1,206.90 84.25 1,206.90 84.25 1,206.90 84.25 1,206.90 84.25 552.00 200.00 12.50 378.00 26.25 260.00 24.00 10.00 112.59 32.88 15,200.57 153.81 3.34 3,076.52 11.05 27.67 379.29 174.67 1.00 391.35 110.36 292.08 128.39 360.39 313.17 60.8~ .47 13.58 CHECK AMOUNT 2,109.84 43.10 51.25 6,4 1,575.34 ~ 2 PAGE 8 O~ ~7 16:46 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 43184 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 4318~ 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 4318~ 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 4318~ 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 4318~ 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 4318~ 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 4318~ 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 4318/, 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 4318~ 05/01/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 FHP 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH I#SUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS REV 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH XNSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS .(HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 FHP 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH I#SUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH I#SUR. PRE 000245 HELTHHET 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH I#SUR.' PRE 000245 KAISERSO 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH ZNSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH IHSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH I#SUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 43185 05/01/97 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO ACCOUNT NUMBER 191-2~90 192-2390 193-2390 194-2390 280-2390 300-2390 320-2390 330-2390 340-2~90 165-2090 280- 2090 190-2090 001-2090 001-2090 190- 2090 340-2090 001-2090 190 - 2090 193- 2090 340-2090 O01 - 2090 001-2090 280-2090 001-2090 001-2090 165 - 2090 280-2090 001-2090 190 - 2090 O01 - 2090 300- 2090 001-2090 001-2090 190-2090 191-2090 192-2090 193-2090 194 - 20~0 280-2090 330-2090 340-2090 001 - 2090 190-2090 193-2090 340-2090 001-2090 190-2090 194-2090 001-2090 280-2090 ITEM AMOUNT .05 .14 1.7'/ .97 1.48 .46 .93 .93 2.09 92.26 92.25 39.65 17.98 142.54 57.91 11.89 16.85 97.22 6.94 110.15 57.02 131.46 908.84- 156.86 111.15 111.14 697.00 354.35 574.13 38.27 1,158.88 5,08~.17 1,540.49 14.84 37.02 259.06 133.08 38.48 296.00 372.91 2,080.92 319.39 12.26 61.30 2,366.82 305.70 101.90 1,835.98 176.54 CHECK AMOUNT 20,740.24 VOUCHRE2 05/01/97 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 43185 43185 43185 43185 43186 43187 43188 43189 43190 43190 43191 43191 43191 43191 43191 43191 43191 43191 43191 43191 43191 43191 43192 43192 43193 43194 43194 43194 43195 43195 43195 43195 43195 43195 43195 43196 43197 16:46 CHECK DATE 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 VENDOR NUMBER 000245 000245 000245 000245 001958 000580 000254 002110 002776 002776 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 OO1537 000255 000255 000947 000262 000262 000262 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 000406 VENDOR NAME PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO PHOTO 6K~KS PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PRIME EQUIPMENT PRIME HATRIX PRIME MATRIX PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION 000245 PERS CHO 000245 PERS DED 000245 PERS-ADM MAY FLAMMER HEALTH INS 001958 PERS L-T PHOTO SERVICES FOR TEN FIRE PUBLIC NOTICES-PA97-0101 RENTAL EQUIPMENT FOR PW SC-5001349-9 MW 909 217-5464:SN:MAR MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM MUTUAL, INC. 001537 OENTALPM MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM MUTUAL, INC. 001537 OENTALPM MUTUAL, INC. MAY COBILR/PARKS&CURRELL MUTUAL, INC. MAY FLAMMER DENTAL PRO LOCK & KEY PRO LOCK & KEY RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER IL~NCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S RIVERSIDE CO. TRANSPORT TCSD LOCKSMITH SERVICES TCSD LOCKSMITH SERVICES BLUEPRINT REPROOUCTION-PU95-28 01-2~-00178-3 BUTTERFIELD LSCP VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS NOVEMBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES DECEMBER 96 LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 97 LEGAL SERVICES FEBRUARY 97 LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 97 LEGAL SERVICES FEBRUARY 9? LEGAL SERVICES CREDIT:NEED OOCUMENTATION BICYCLE COURSE:NUNGLE:05/6-8 PLANS:RANCHO CA RD ~ MURR CRK ACCOUNT NUMBER 300-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-1170 001-2122 001-171-999-5296 001-161-999-5256 001-16~-601-5238 190-180-999-5208 190-180-999-5208 001-23~0 165-Z:T~0 190-2340 192-2340 193-23~0 194-22~0 280-23~0 300-2-~0 330-2340 340-~40 001-1180 001-1170 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 210-165-655-5804 191-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 190-180-999-5240 300-199-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 001-170-999-5261 001-16~-604-5250 ITEM AMOUNT 77.00 882.85 96.03 154.85 40.62 392.13 17.00 213.56 13.61- 31.13 2,186.60 33.85 369.51 3.39 20.32 47.38 101.55 16.92 25.66 84.62 93.36 25.66 16.16 50.00 33.86 13.39 3,168.20 1,389.01 343.00 448.75 2,096.31 1,0~9.25 3,300.77 1,401.25 183.00- 60.00 40.00 CHECK AMOUNT 19,449.37 40.62 392.13 17.00 213.56 17.52 3,008.82 4,570.60 8,506.33 60.00 43198 05/01/97 000357 RIVERSIDE CO. TRANSPORT SIGNAL DES/CONST-WINCH/RORIPAU 210-165-648-5802 9,332.47 ' !2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 10 L ;7 16:46 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 43198 05/01/97 000357 RIVERSIDE CO. TRANSPORT SIGNAL DES/CONST-WINCH/ROR%PAU 210-165-648-5804 63,180.86 72,513.33 43199 05/01/97 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION MAR PRGSS:WINCHESTER/I-15 BRID 280-199-602-5804 43199 05/01/97 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION MAR PRGSS RETENTION ~/H 280-2035 90,617.50 9,061.75- 81,555.75 43200 05/01/97 RVSD CO. SHERIFF DEPUTY REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00 43201 05/01/97 002384 SECURE BUSINESS COMMUNI MODIFY SYSTEM-COUNCIL CHAMBERS 340-199-701-5250 4,600.00 4,600.00 43202 05/01/97 SHAFFER POOLS INC REFUND:POOL PERMIT OUT OF CITY 001-2290 1.2~ 43202 05/01/97 SHAFFER POOLS INC REFUND:POOL PERMIT OUT OF CITY 001-162-4285 279.50 280.7~ 43203 05/01/97 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 56-77-816-6613-01 NICOLAS ]RR 190-180-999-5240 14.39 43204 05/01/97 002651 SUN BADGE COMPANY CODE ENFORCEMENT BADGE 001-162-999-5243 59.00 43204 05/01/97 002651 SUN BADGE COMPANY CODE INSPECTORS BADGES 001-162-999-5243 5.00 43204 05/01/97 002651 SUN BADGE COMPANY TAX 001-162-999-5243 4.28 68.28 43205 05/01/97 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN OUES 001-2125 484.83 43205 05/01/97 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 190-2125 82.00 ~ 05/01/97 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN OUES 191-2125 1.02 , 05/01/97 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 192-2125 2.05 ~:05 05/01/97 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 193-2125 15.38 43205 05/01/97 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 194-2125 2.05 43205 05/01/97 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 280-2125 2.05 43205 05/01/97 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 300-2125 5.12 43205 05/01/97 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 320-2125 20.50 615.00 43206 05/01/97 TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 105.00 105.00 43207 05/01/97 000311 TEMECULA VALLEY HIGH SC REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT CK7899 190-18]-4990 100.00 100.00 43208 05/01/97 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONNTR]BUTION TO FLEX 165-1020 137.50 43208 05/01/97 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 001-1020 4,115.36 43208 05/01/97 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 190-1020 651.66 43208 05/01/97 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 193-1020 12.50 43208 05/01/97 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 300-1020 10.00 43208 05/01/97 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF o FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX ~40-1020 62.50 43208 05/01/97 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 280-1020 452.50 43209 05/01/97 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VL REVER 001-2510 229.40- 43209 05/01/97 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 169.80 43209 05/01/97 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 48.50 43209 05/01/97 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL L]FE 192-2510 43209 05/01/97 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 193-2510 2.35 43209 05/01/97 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 194-2510 4.20 43209 05/01/97 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510 4.25 43209 05/01/97 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VL ADVAN 001-2510 229.40 ' 05/01/97 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 169.80 05/01/97 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 48.50 4~=u9 05/01/97 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 192-2510 .30 5,~2.02 VOUCHRE2 05/01/97 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 43209 43209 43209 16:46 CHECK OATE 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 VENDOR NUMBER 002107 002107 0O2107 VENDOR NAME TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 43210 05/01/97 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 43210 05/01/97 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (OEF. 0 001065 DEF COMP 43210 05/01/97 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (OEF. 0 001065 OEF COMP 43210 05/01/97 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (OEF. C 001065 OEF COMP 43210 05/01/97 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. ¢ 001065 DEF COMP 43210 05/01/97 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 43210 05/01/97 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 43210 05/01/97 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (OEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 43210 05/01/97 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO ¢DEF. C 001065 OEF COMP 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 05/01/97 43211 43211 43211 43211 43211 43211 43212 43212 43212 43212 000389 000389 000389 000389 000389 000389 000325 000325 000325 000325 000326 000326 000326 001342 001342 001342 001342 001939 002092 43213 43213 43213 43214 43214 43214 43214 U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR U S C M /PEBSCO COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR UNITED WAY UNITED WAY UNITED WAY UNITED WAY UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WESTVIEW VOCATIONAL SER WINDSOR PROJECTS, INC. WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH 43215 43216 43217 05/01/97 05/01/97 000325 UW 000325 UW 000325 UW 000325 U~ UNIFORMS FOR PUBLIC WORKS FLOOR MAT RENTAL/CLEANING-CRC FLOOR MAT RENT/CLEANING-SR CTR BLDG MAIMT SUPPLIES-CITY HALL BUILDING MAINTENACE SUPPLIES BLDG #AINT SUPPLIES-CITY HALLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES REFUND:NON-PROFIT:BUSINESS LIC MAY RENT FOR STORAGE AREA LAYOUT FOR BALLOON & WINE AD ACCOUNT NUMBER 193-2510 194-2510 340-2510 001-2080 190-2080 192-2080 193-2080 194-2080 280-2080 300-2080 320-2080 ~40-2080 001-2160 165-2160 190-2160 193-2160 280-2160 340-2160 001-2120 165-2120 190-2120 280-2120 001-164-601-5243 190-182-999-5250 190-181-999-5250 340-199-702-5212 190-180-999-5212 340-199-702-5212 190-184-999-5212 001-199-4056 340-199-701-5234 280-199-999-5270 ITEM AMOUNT 2.35 4.20 4.25 3,407.18 1,129.40 5.00 40.63 148.12 5.00 19.98 312.50 128.12 658.08 69.00 793.04 23.34 44.06 52.72 101.80 2.50 17.00 2.70 180.89 105.47 51.79 505.90 341.91 108.83 147.74 35.00 1,071.60 339.41 CHECK AMOUNT 458.80 5,195.93 124.00 338.15 1,10~.38 35.00 1,071.60 339.41 TOTAL CHECKS 411,114.24 09:53 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERZOOS PAGE FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP INSURANCE FUND FACILITIES AMOUNT 433,562.80 57,420.94 2,022.00 20,080.7T 275,937.27 174,255.79 8,466.14 ~2.74 TOTAL 972,7~8.45 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 05/02/97 09:53 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 43243 05/13/97 002:348 A-PARK AVENUE BUILDERS STREET MAINTENANCE-FRONT ST 001-164-601-5402 43244 05/13/97 001281 ALHAMBRA GROUP PROF SERVICES-WINCHESTER CREEK 210-190-149-5802 8,500.00 6,700.00 8,500.00 6,70O.OO 43245 05/13/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA MAR LDSC MAINTENANCE - PARKS 190-180-999-5415 43245 05/13/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA MAR LDSC MAINTENANCE - SR CTR 190-181-999-5415 43245 05/13/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA MAR LDSC MAINTENANCE - CRC 190-182-999-5415 43245 05/13/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA MAR LDSC MAINTENANCE-CITY HALL 340-199-701-5415 43245 05/13/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA MAR LDSC MAINTENANCE - MEDIANS 191-180-999-5415 43245 05/13/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA MAR LDSC MAINTENANCE-BALLFIELD 190-180-999-5415 43245 05/13/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA MAR LOSC MAINT-SAM HICKS PARK 190-180-999-5415 43245 05/13/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANOSCAPE MA MAR LDSC MAINTENANCE-T.C.C. 190-184-999-5415 43245 05/13/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA MAR LOSC MAINT-MARGARITA MEO. 191-180-999-5415 43245 05/13/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA APR LDSC MAINT-PARKS 190-180-999-5415 43245 05/13/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA APR LDSC MAINT-SENIOR CENTER 190-181-999-5415 43245 05/13/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA APR LOSC MAINT-C.R.C. 190-182-999-5415 43245 05/13/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE NA APR LDSC MAINT-CITY HALL 340-199-701-5415 43245 05/13/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANOSCAPE MA APR LDSC MAINT-MEOIANS 191-180-999-5415 43245 05/13/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA APR LDSC MAINT-BALLFIELDS 190-180-999-5415 43245 05/13/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA APR LDSC MAINT-SAM HICKS PARK 190-180-999-5415 43245 05/13/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA APR LDSC MAINT-T.C.C. 190-184-999-5415 43245 05/13/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA APR LDSC MAINT-MARGARITA MED. 191-180-999-5415 43246 05/13/97 002086 CALIFORNIA PAVEMENT MAN REL.RETENTION-A/W SLURRY SEAL 001-2035 43247 05/13/97 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LDSC MAINTENANCE - SLOPES 193-180-999-5415 43247 05/13/97 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LDSC MAINT - SPORTS PARK 190-180-999-5415 43248 05/13/97 002129 GREAT WEST CONTRACTORS, PROG PMT#14-PARKVIEW FIRE ST 210-190-626-5804 43248 05/13/97 002129 GREAT WEST CONTRACTORS, RETENTION W/H PMT-PARICVIEW 210-2035 43248 05/13/97 002129 GREAT WEST CONTRACTORS, RELEASE STOP NOTICE:PARKVIEW 210-2038 43248 05/13/97 002129 GREAT WEST CONTRACTORS, RELEASE STOP NOTICE:PARK'VIEW 210-2038 43249 05/13/97 0021r50 INLAND ACOUSTICS, INC. INSTALL ACOUSTICAL CEILING-CRC 210-190-152-5804 43249 05/13/97 0027'50 INLAND ACOUSTICS, INC. RETENTION W/H PMT-CRC GYM 210-2035 43250 05/13/97 002~97 LANDMARK/CALIFORNIA STA ESCRO~ ACT:GREAT WEST CONTRACT 210-1035 43251 05/13/97 002295 LEWIS & LEWIS ENTERPRIS A.I.M. SYSTEM FOR TEM. P.D. 001-170-999'5610 43251 05/13/97 002295 LEWIS & LEWIS ENTERPRIS TAX 001-170-999'5610 43252 05/13/97 002724 MIGHTY MOVER TRAILER, I MOBILE TRAFFIC MONITOR-POLICE 001-170-999-5610 43252 05/13/97 002724 MIGHTY MOVER TRAILER, I TAX 001-170-999'5610 43253 05/13/97 002790 PETER-BUILT HONES 43254 05/13/97 001264 PRICE COSTCO, INC. 43255 05/13/97 000270 R d M OESIGN GROUP, INC FIRST ORAW-TEMECULA STAGE STOP YEAR FOUR PYMT PER OPA JAN-APR PROF SVCS-PARKVIEW 280-1500 280-199-999-5276 210-190-626-5802 19,651.37 245.67 1,692.53 496.37 926.00 1,110.00 760.00 325.00 85.00 19,651.37 245.67 1,692.53 496.37 926.00 1,480.00 760.00 325.00 85.00 24,098.51 20,080.77 7,704.51 36,788.83 3,678.88- 24,150.00 17,407.89 20,727.00 2,072.70- 8,750.00 634.38 11,803.75 914.79 14,999.86 158,843.10 12,703.00 50,9. 24,098.51 27,785.28 18,654.30 3,678.88 9,38~.38 12,718.54 14,999.86 158,843.10 12,7 43256 05/13/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS MARCH 97 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 7,555.40 ,, 2 O. /7 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 43256 43256 43256 43256 43256 43256 43256 43256 43256 43256 43256 43256 43256 43256 43256 43256 43256 43256 43256 43256 43257 43258 43258 43258 43258 43258 43258 43258 43258 43258 43258 43258 43258 43258 43258 43258 43258 43258 43258 43258 43258 43258 43258 4a~9 09:53 CHECK DATE 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 05/13/97 VENDOR NUMBER 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 002412 0O2412 002412 002412 002412 002412 000355 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000357 VENDOR NAME RICHARDS, RICHARDS, RICHARDS, RICHARDS, RICHARDS, RICHARDS, RICHARDS, RICHARDS, RICHARDS, RICHARDS, RICHARDS, RICHARDS, RICHARDS, RICHARDS, RICHARDS, RICHARDS, RICHARDS, RICHARDS, RICHARDS, RICHARDS, RICHARDS, RICHARDS, RICHARDS, RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERS[DE RIVERS[DE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE RIVERSIDE WATSON & GERS WATSON & GERS WATSON & GERS WATSON & GERS WATSON & GERS WATSON & GERS WATSON & GERS WATSON & GERS WATSON & GERS WATSON & GERS WATSON & GERS WATSON & GERS WATSON & GERS WATSON & GERS WATSON & GERS WATSON & GERS WATSON & GERS WATSON & GERS WATSON & GERS WATSON & GERS WATSON & GERS WATSON & GERS WATSON & GERS CO. REGIST. V CO. SHERIFF'S CO. SHERIFF~S CO. SHERIFF'S CO. SHERIFF'S CO. SHERIFF~S CO. SHERIFF~S CO. SHERIFF~S CO. SHERIFF~S CO. $HERIFF~S CO. SHERIFF~S CO. SHERIFF~S CO. SHERIFF'S CO. SHERIFF~S CO. $HERIFF'S CO. SHERIFF~S CO. SHERIFF~S CO. SHERIFF~S CO. SHERIFF'S CO. SHERIFF~S CO. SHERIFF'S CO. SHERIFF~S CO. SHERIFF~S CO. SHERIFF~S CO. TRANSPORT CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION MARCH 97 LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 97 LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 97 LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 97 LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 97 LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 97 LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 97 LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 97 LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 97 LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 97 LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 97 LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 97 LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 97 LEGAL SERVICES MAR 97 LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 97 LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 97 LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 97 LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 97 LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 97 LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 97 LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 97 LEGAL SERVICES MAR 97 LEGAL SERVICES CREDIT: OVERBILLED HOURS ELECTION SERVS (MEASURE C) 1/16 - 2/12 LAW ENFORCEMENT 1/16 - 2/12 LAW ENFORCEMENT 1/16 - 2/12 LAW ENFORCEMENT 1/16 - 2/12 LAW ENFORCEMENT 1/16 - 2/12 LAW ENFONCENENT 1/16 - 2/12 LAW ENFORCEMENT 1/16 - 2/12 LAW ENFORCEMENT 1/16 - 2/12 LAW ENFORCEMENT 1/16 - 2/12 LAW ENFORCEMENT 1/16 - 2/12 LAW ENFORCEMENT 1/16 - 2/12 LAW ENFORCEMENT 1/16 - 2/12 LAW ENFORCEMENT RATE ADdUSTMENT FOR 7/1-1/15 RATE ADJUSTMENT FOR 7/1-1/15 RATE ADJUSTMENT FOR 7/1-1/15 RATE ADJUSTMENT FOR 7/1-1/15 RATE ADJUSTMENT FOR 7/1-1/15 RATE ADJUSTMENT FOR 7/1-1/15 RATE ADJUSTMENT FOR 7/1-1/15 RATE ADJUSTMENT FOR 7/1-1/15 RATE ADJUSTMENT FOR 7/1-1/15 RATE ADJUSTMENT FOR 7/1-1/15 FEBRUARY 1997 BOOKING FEES 4TH QTR SRVC LEVEL FY 96/97 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 190-180-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 280-199-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 001-120-999-5225 001-170-999-5288 001-170-999-5299 001-170-999-5298 001-170-999-5294 001-170-999-5288 001-170-999-5291 001-170-999-5291 001-1230 001-1230 001-170-999-5281 001-170-999-5282 001-170-999-5262 001-170-999-5288 001-170-999-5299 001-170-999-5298 001-170-999-5294 001-170-999-5288 001-170-999-5291 001-1230 001-170-999-5281 001-170-999-5282 001-170-999-5262 001-170-999°5273 001-164-602-5405 ITEM AMOUNT 1,069.00 341.75 6,434.25 1,T'/T.29 472.00 241.50 615.50 71.25 1,819.75 412.83 871.50 1,796.67 1,777.22 5,455.17 697.52 2,301.84 747.14 16.00 1,184.58 262.71 11,246.75 311.52 38.00- 47,149.88 208,586.01 28,644.41 18,551.00 9,236.78 5,817.41 2,927.20 2,970.24 2,927.20 2,970.24 23,769.25 2,78~.00 13,177.15 45,533.65- 7,847.30- 4,953.98- 2,289.16- 6,656.76- 3,064.53- 3,064.53- 2,389.97- 45.12 215.75 12,916.80 21,105.00 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 47,441.14 47,149.88 259,738.68 21,105.00 VOUCHRE2 05/02/97 09:53 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 43260 43260 43260 43261 43261 43261 43262 43262 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 05/13/97 002451 SKYTEC 05/13/97 002451 .SKYTEC 05/13/97 002451 SKYTEC 05/13/97 0027~7 05/13/97 0027'~7 05/13/97 002737 05/13/97 002566 05/13/97 002566 TCYJN & FAIRWAY GOLF CAR TOt. IN & FAIRgAY GOLF CAR TO~N & FAIRWAY GOLF CAR VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION APR PRGSS:CZTY MAINT FACILITY APR PRGSS-CITY MAINT FACILITY RETENTION:APR PRGSS CITY MAINT 1996 E Z GO GOLF CART FLIP FLOP REAR SEAT PACKAGE TAX INTEL PENT]UN 166HHZ COMPUTER TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER 210-190-144-5804 210-190-144-5804 210-2035 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 ITEM AMOUNT 5,227.26 172,031.90 17,725.91- 4,600.00 ~O.OO 414.63 7,720.00 598.30 CHECK AMOUNT 159,533.25 5,76~.63 8,318.30 TOTAL CHECKS 9?2,7'58.45 12'EM 4 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director May 13, 1997 City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 1997 Jesse Diaz, Accounting Tech That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 1997. DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio and receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635 as of March 31, 1997. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 1997 2. Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Equity as of March 31, 1997 City of Temecula City Treasurer's Report As of March 31, 1997 Cash Activity for the Month of March: Cash and Investments as of March 1, 1997 Cash Receipts Cash Disbursements Cash and Investments as of March 31, 1997 $ 48,287,971 3,108,749 (3,102,097) $ 48,294,623 cash and Investments Portfolio: Type of Investment Petty Cash General Checking Sweep Account (Money Market Account) Benefit Demand Deposits Local Agency Investment Fund Retention Escrow Account Retention Escrow Account Checking Accounts (Sherwood/Pujol Apartments) Deferred Compensation Fund Deferred Compensation Fund Defined Contribution Fund Trust Accounts-TCSD COPs (Money Market Account) Reserve Account-TCSD COPs (Guaranteed investment Contract) Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds (Money Market Account) Reserve Account-RDA Bonds (Guaranteed Investment Contract) Institution City Hall Union Bank Union Bank (Stepstone Treasury) Union Bank State Treasurer Landmark/California State Bank First Pacific National Bank Home Savings of Amedca ICMA PEBSCO PEB~CO First Trust (First Am. Treasury) Bayedsche Landesbank First Trust (First Am. Treasury) Bayerische Landesbank Yield 4.700 5.580 5.100 5.250 4.807 6.870 4.807 7.400 Maturity D~e ContmctuaV Market Value $ 1,500 422,832 210,000 3,593 33,856,258 186,243 129,223 11,503 371,709 581,629 62,711 177,900 502,690 10,327,912 1,448,920 Par/Book Balance $ 1,500 422,832 (1) 210,000 3,593 (1) 33,856,258 (3) 186,243 129,223 11,503 371,709 581,629 62,711 177,900 502,690 10,327,912 1,448,920 $ 48,294,623 (1)-This amount is net of outstanding checks. (2)-AJI investments are liquid and currently available. (3)-At March 31, 1997 total market value for the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) was $28,277,476,127. The City's proportionate shara of that value is $34,058,700. The City of Temecula'$ portfolio is in compliance with the investment policy. Adequate funds will be available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next six months. City of'remecula Schedule of Assets, Liabilites, and Fund Balances As of March 31, 1997 Community Services Redevelopment City (1) District Agency Total Assets: Cash and investments $ 29,543,886 $ 1,965,302 $ 16,785,435 $ 48,294,623 Receivables 4,099,927 142,362 663,982 4,906,271 Due from other funds 1,238,327 16,723 1,255,050 Land held for resale 2,103,053 2,103,053 Prepaid assets 133,162 133,162 Deposits 544,589 559,640 1,104,229 Fixed assets-net 1,061,585 1.061.585 Total assets $ 36,621,476 $ 2,124,387 $ 20,112,110 $ 58,857,973 Liabil~es and fund equity: Liabili'des: Dueto other funds $ 1,205,527 $ 16,723 $ 32,800 $ 1,255,050 Other liabilites 5,236,574 225,928 762,996 6,225.498 Total liabilities 6,442,101 242,651 795,796 7,480,548 Fund equity: Contributed capital 1,281,781 1,281,781 Retained earnings 559,726 559,726 Fund balances: Reserved (2) 2,809,631 793,550 7,946,196 11,549,37-/' Designated (3) 19,548,517 1,159,666 11,370,118 32,078,301 Undesignated 5,979,720 (71,480) 5,908,240 Total fund equity 30,179,375 1,881,736 19,316,314 51,377,425 Total liabil~es and fund equity $ 36,621,476 $ 2,124,387 $ 20,112,110 $ 58,857,973 (1) Includes General Fund, ClP Fund, Gas Tax Fund, other special revenue funds, and deferred comp agency funds. (2) Includes amounts reserved for encumbrances, land held for resale, long-term notes receivable, Iow/mod housing, and debt service. (3) Includes amounts designated for economic uncertainty, future capital projects, debt service, and con~nuing appropriations. ITEM 5 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPRt3VA! CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREC~~ .CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 13, 1997 Authorize access to Lot 28 in Tract No. 9833-1 from Margarita Road.(Westerly side of Margarita Road Southerly of Pio Pico Road). PREPARED BY:~ Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: City Council AUTHORIZE driveway access to Lot 28 in Tract No. 9833-1 from Margarita Road by permitting an exception to the abutters access rights dedicated to and accepted by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors' approval of the final Tract Map, and AUTHORIZE the City Engineer to approve the specific location, subject to the preparation of an agreement wherein the applicants shall quitclaim their rights to access from Pio Pico Road. Agreement shall be satisfactory to the City Engineer and City Attorney prior to recordation of the agreement. BACKGROUND: The Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved Tract No. 9833-1 on January 9, 1979, and accepted offers of dedication for street and public utility purposes over several streets including Margarita Road. The acceptances included dedication of access rights to the public for lots fronting on Margarita Road within the tract boundaries. The restriction of access to Lot 28 from Margarita Road did not take into account that much of the buildable area for this lot was not accessible to the planned access from Pio Pico Road. A drainage facility cuts diagonally across said Lot 28 and makes development economically infeasible without access to Margarita Road. The tract map also provided for offers of certain drainage and slope easements along the Margarita Road lot frontages which offers were not accepted by the Board of Supervisors. The physical nature of these slope areas will be considered in any driveway access design. Another concern will be the future raised median islands specified for Margarita Road as an arterial highway under the City's adopted General Plan. The proposed access to the subject Lot 28 should therefore be restricted to right turns in-right turns out only. The precise location of the driveway access would be determined at the time that a grading plan is submitted for Staff review and approval, and would be incorporated into the required agreement. r.\iodrpt~9710513~rnergeece.ee/ajl) FISCAL IMPACT: None AttAchments: 1. Letter of request for access 2. Location Map. r:\lgdmt\97/O~ 13\merg acce. aalajp CLEVELAND INVESTMENT COMPANY INC. RECEIVE[ JAN ~ ~ 1997 January 17, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA ENGI,%'EERtNG DEPA~T~,EN Ronald J. Parks City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Dear Mr. Parks: Re: Request for a 20 foot driveway opening on restricted access Margarita Road The subject property is located at the southwesterly comer of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road. The legal description is Lot 28 of Tract Map 9833-1, recorded in Map Book 101, Pages 75-80. The APN is 950-030-028. The purpose of this letter is to request the City of Temecula to grant permission for a 20 foot residential driveway opening on the presently restricted access Margarita Road. Presently the only access to the property is from Pio Pico Road. The following are some of the reasons we believe this is a valid request. 1. There is not sufficient area to construct a house pad adjacent to Pio Pico Road due to the topography and two drainage channels. If access was limited to Pio Pico a very long driveway would have to be constructed which would include crossing the 110 foot drainage easement. This would require a very costly and impractical drainage structure and may require removal of a portion of the 6 foot chain link fence enclosing the channel. 3. Due to the drainage channels and the limited frontage on Pio Pico any driveway opening on Pio Pico may be dangerously close the street intersection. 4. Sparkman School on the easterly side of Margarita Road has two driveway openings with apparently no problems. The adjacent property south of our parcel has a driveway on Margarita Road with no apparent problems. 6. The requested 20 foot residential driveway opening will be for a single family home which will generate very few daily trips. 7. It is our understanding that in the near future Margarita Road will have a center median which will limit the requested driveway to right tums only. The location of the requested 20 foot driveway opening is centered 100 feet north of the southerly property comer on Margarita Road. We are enclosing an exhibit which shows the existing conditions, the proposed driveway and potential pad area. If you need additional information, please, feel free to call us at your convenience. 28465 Front Street. Suite 321 · Temecul~ ("nli~:nrnin O?~aO · /anal ~'~_~! ~ ~ c,v tonal We realize that this request may require a formal application and a fee. We would appreciate it if you would supply us with the application and fee schedule at your earliest convenience. Thank you, Managing Partner Roger . Epp~~a~'~- Managing Partner l,ot 28--Tract No. 9833-! Margarita Road Access Location Map NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCAI,F, r~'~M 6 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager APPRtlVA! CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECT~~ CITY MANAGER I~~ ~ Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 13, 1997 Authorize access to Parcel 1 in Parcel Map No. 21451 from Santiago Road (Northerly side of Santiago Road Westerly of Margarita Road) PREPARED BY: .~, Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development AlbertK. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: City Council APPROVE a new driveway location access opening fronting on Santiago Road Westerly of Margarita Road, and AUTHORIZE the City Engineer to approve the specific location, subject to the preparation of an agreement wherein the applicants shall quitclaim their rights in an offsite access opening, and shall agree to physically close their existing driveway. Agreement shall be satisfactory to the City Engineer and City Attorney prior to recordation of the agreement. BACKGROUND: The Riverside County Surveyor and Road Commissioner, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors, approved Parcel Map No. 21451 on December 2, 1986, and accepted offers of dedication for street and public utility purposes for portions of Santiago Road. The acceptances included dedication of access rights to the public for parcels fronting on Santiago Road within the parcel map boundaries, excepting a 30 feet wide access opening which serves two parcels and the Metropolitan Water District easement traversing the parent parcel map. Access to Santiago Road, a major highway, is normally limited to public street intersections. Driveway accesses are normally limited to the interior local streets, in order to reduce potential collisions with the higher speed traffic experienced along arterial highways. However, the topography of the several parcels created by the approval and recording of Parcel Map No. 21451 prevented reasonable access to these parcels from the interior street system. An exception to the abuttars rights restriction was made, and therefore a small multi-use driveway opening on Parcel 2 was approved and accepted by the County of Riverside on the face of the parcel map. The proposed driveway access under consideration would provide one driveway within the area fronting Parcel 1 which was previously dedicated for abuttars access rights to the public. The existing common driveway access onto Parcel I over a portion of Parcel 2 would be fenced off upon completion of the new driveway, and their rights to use of the former access point would be quitclaimed in an agreement approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney. ~.~gdrpt~97\OS 13\aantiage. ac./~j~ The placement of the proposed driveway shall meet the requirements for proximity to a street intersection and any necessary removals, grading, and construction shall be performed to City of Temecula grading and construction permits subject to City standard plans and specifications, and encroachment permit provisions. The applicants have found the mutual access driveway over the neighboring parcel to be inconvenient and subject to conflicts. Santiago Road has been reclassified from the Riverside County Southwest Area Plan designation of Arterial Highway (110 feet right-of-way) to a Secondary Highway (88 feet right-of-way) on the Circulation Element of the City General Plan. FISCAL IMPACT: None AttRchments: 1. Letter of request for access 2. Location Map. r.~agdrpt\97~0513\=.ntiago.ac.laj~ March 21, 1997 To: Joseph Kicak Engineering Department From: Mr. & Mrs. Love 31200 Santiago Rd. Temecula, Calif. 92592 (909) 693-2475 Mr. Joseph Kicak We have been m contact with Mr. Larry Coolie in regards to obtaining permission for approval to access our home off of Santiago Rd. Per the cities request I am enclosing a diagram plot plan of our property. On this plan I have included the distances from existing opening to the purposed new opening and the distances to the next street from the end of the opening. We will acknowledge the use of the new driveway once complete, and waive all other fights to the existing driveway. We will fence of the property and there will be no further use of the easement in question. Please contact us fithere is anything else we can do to obtain your approval. Sincerely, V/CIAJlTV MdP SI Parcel Map No. ?.14~1 SantiaEo Road Access to Parcel 1 ],ocation Map NOTE.: MAPS NOT TO ~qC. AI,F. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPRnVA! [')~ ~, ~ CITY ATTORNEY lfwv~ FINANCE DIREC'I~~ CITY MANAGER k/~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager /~ Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 13, 1997 Release Faithful Performance Warranty, and Labor and Materials Bonds in Tract No. 20703-2 (Easterly of intersection of Roripaugh Road at Winchester Road) PREPARED BY: )~ Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development Albert I(. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials Bonds for Street, Water and Sewer Improvements in Tract No. 20703-2, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the developer and surety. BACKGROUND: On June 14, 1988, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision agreements with: Barratt American Incorporated, c/o Coscan Davidson Homes 12865 Pointe Del Mar Del Mar, CA 92014 for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentation in Tract No. 20703-2. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by The American Insurance Company as follows: 1. Bond No. 11126948501 in the amount of $623,500 to cover street improvements. 2. Bond No. 11126948519 in the amount of $168,000 to cover water system improvements. 3. Bond No. 11126948527 in the amount of $166,000 to cover sewer system improvements. Bonds No. 11126948501, 11126948519, and 11126948527 in the amount of $311,750, $84,400, and $83,000, respectively, to cover material and labor for street, water, and sewer improvements. R:\AGDRPT~97~0513\TR207032.FNL 5. Bond No. 11126948535 in the amount of $27,000 to cover subdivision monumentation. On February 13, 1996, the City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the one- year warranty period, authorized the reduction in Faithful Performance bond amounts for warranty purposes, and released the subdivision monument bond. The subdivider submitted riders to the Faithful Performance Bonds changing the obligee' from the County of Riverside to the City of Temecula, reducing the bond amounts by ninety percent (90%), and retaining ten- percent (10%) for warranty purposes in the following amounts: Streets and Drainage improvements: Water System Improvements: Sewer System Improvements: Bond No. 11126948501 Bond No. 11126948519 Bond No. 11126948527 $62,350 $16,800 $16,600 Public Works Staff has inspected the improvements and any removals/replacements have been satisfactorily completed. Staff recommends that these warranty bonds now be released. The developer was required to post Material and Labor Bonds to ensure payment to suppliers and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by statute after the Governmental Agency has accepted the public improvements. The contractual claim period having run and no claims having been filed with the City, Staff therefore recommends that the following Labor and Materials bonds be released: Street Improvements: Water System Improvements: Sewer System improvements: Bond No. 11126948501 Bond No. 11126948519 Bond No. 11126948527 $311,750 $ 84,400 $ 83,000 The affected streets were accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City Council Resolution No. 96- . The streets within the subdivision are Jimson Circle, Aralia Court, Lark Court, Mimulus Way, Sanderling Way, and portions of Winchester Road, Swallow Court, Starling Street, Senna Court, and Roripaugh Road. Winchester Road was already included in the State Highway Maintenance System. FISCAL IMPACT: None AttAchment: Location Map R:~,AGDRPT~97\O513\TR207032.FNL VICINITY MAP TRACT NO. 20703-2 Location Map NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE APPRt3VA! CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREC'F~~ CITY MANAGER CiTY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 13, 1997 SUBJECT: Release Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Material Bonds in Tract No. 20703-3 (Southeasterly of Winchester Road and Southwesterly of Nicolas Road) PREPARED BY:~ Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council AUTHORIZE release of the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond Riders and Labor and Material Bonds for Public improvements in Tract No. 20703-3, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the developer and surety. BACKGROUND: On June 28, 1988, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision agreements with: Barratt American Incorporated, c/o Coscan Davidson Homes 12865 Pointe Del Mar Del Mar, CA 92014 for the improvement of streets and drainage, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by The American Insurance Company as follows: 1. Bond No. 11126948717 in the amount of $496,000 to cover street improvements. 2. Bond No. 11126948725 in the amount of $131,000 to cover water system improvements. 3. Bond No. 11126948733 in the amount of $134,000 to cover sewer system improvements. Bonds No. 11126948717, 11126948725, and 11126948733 in the amount of $248,000, $65,500, and $67,000, respectively, to cover material and labor for street, water, and sewer improvements. R:~.4,GDRPT~97~0513\TR207033 5. Bond No. 11126948741 in the amount of $35,400 to cover subdivision monumentation. On November 14, 1995, the City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the one- year warranty period, authorized release of the subdivision monumentation bond, and accepted the faithful performance bond riders, changing the obligee' from Riverside County to the City of Temecula, and reducing the bond amounts for Faithful Performance warranty purposes to the following amounts: Streets and Drainage improvements: Sewer System Improvements: Water System Improvements: Bond No. 11126948717 M Bond No. 11126948733 M Bond No. 11126948725 M $49,6O0 $13,400 $13,100 Public Works staff has reviewed the project in the field and all necessary repairs/replacements have been satisfactorily completed. Staff therefore recommends the release of the Faithful Performance Warranty securities. The developer was required to post Material and Labor Bonds to ensure payment to suppliers and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by statute after the Governmental Agency has accepted the public improvements. This lien period has run and no claims having been filed, Staff recommends the release of the labor and materials bonds as follows: Streets and Drainage Improvements Water System Improvements Sewer System Improvements Bond No. 11126948717 Bond No. 11126948725 Bond No. 11126948733 $248,O00 $ 65,500 $ 67,O0O The affected streets were accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City Council Resolution No. 95-94 on November 14, 1995. The streets within the subdivision are Bolandra Court, Barberry Court, Dandelion Court, Rosebay Court, and portions of Winchester Road, Nicolas Road, and Roripaugh Road. FISCAL IMPACT: None AttAchment: Location Map R:~.GDRPT~97\O513\TR207033.REL VICINITY MAP NO W~C.U~ST ,~N D "~ MURRIETA RANCHO L~ /7// TRACT NO. 20703-3 Location Map rl'~M 9 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: .APPRC)VA! CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 13, 1997 Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 21675-6. (Southwesterly of Intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho Vista Road) PREPARED BY: /~//Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development ~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: City Council ACCEPT the Public Improvements in Tract No 21675-6, AUTHORIZE the initiation of the one-year warranty period, reduction of the Faithful Performance Street and drainage, and Water and Sewer security amounts, and release of the Subdivision Monument security, ACCEPT substitute securities for Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Sureties. BACKGROUND: On July 3, 1990, the City Council approved Tract No. 21675-6 and entered into agreements with: Mesa Homes (Now KI/FKLA Rancho Realty, LLC) 27555 Ynez Road, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92591 for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds posted by Lumbermen Mutual Casualty Company in the following amounts: Bond No. S 687 505 00 in the amount of $241,000 to cover street improvements Bond No. S 687 506 00 in the amount of $38,000 to cover water improvements. Bond No. S 687 507 00 in the amount of $46,000 to cover sewer improvements. Bond No. S 687 508 00 In the amount of $12,000 to cover subdivision monumentation. Bonds No. S 687 505 00, S 687 506 00, and S 687 507 00 in the amounts of $120,000, $19,500, and $46,000, respectively, to cover materials and labor. R:~AGDRPT~97~0513 \TR216756 .ACC On December 17, 1991, the City Council authorized reduction in faithful performance bond amounts consistent with the work completed and providing ten-percent (10%) warranty provisions. The faithful performance bond amounts were reduced as follows: Streets: $143,000 Water: $30,400 Sewer: $ 36,800 The faithful performance bond amounts retained were as follows: Streets: $98,000 Water: $ 7,600 Sewer: $ 9,200 The work has now been completed and Eastern Municipal and Rancho California Water Districts have accepted their items of work. Public Works Staff therefore recommends acceptance of the public improvements, reduction in Faithful Performance security amounts to the ten-percent warranty level, and initiation of the one-year warranty period. Therefore it is appropriate to reduce the Faithful Performance securities to the following warranty amounts: Street: $24,100 Water: $ 3,800 Sewer: $ 4.600 Total = $32,500 The Developer has submitted substitute bonds for faithful performance warranty security and labor and materials. The bonds have been posted by the Aeta Casualty & Surety Co. as follows: Faithful Performance Warranty Labor and Materials Bond No. 100869980-97-004 Bond No. 100869980-97-005 $ 32,500 $162,500 The subdivision monumentation requirements have been met, and Staff therefore recommends release of the following security: Subdivision Monumentation Bond No. s 687 508 00 in the amount of $12,000 The affected streets are being accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City Council Resolution No. 97- at this time. The streets within the subdivision to be accepted are Corte Rosario and Calle Santa Ana. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: Location Map Substitute Securities (On file) R:~GDRF~97~0513\TR216756 .ACC VICINITY UdP Tract No. 7167~-6 i_'~ocation Man NOTIt.: MAPS NOT TO SCAI,F. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager APPRClVA/ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREC~O~ CITY MANAGER I'v~t~' Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 13, 1997 Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 21675-F. (Southwesterly of Intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho Vista Road) PREPARED BY: /~._~Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development ~ Albert I(. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: City Council ACCEPT the Public Improvements in Tract No 21675-F, AUTHORIZE the initiation of the one-year warranty period, reduction of the Faithful Performance Street, and Water and Sewer security amounts to warranty level, and release of the subdivision monument bond, ACCEPT substitute securities for Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Sureties. BACKGROUND: On July 3, 1990, the City Council approved Tract No. 21675-6 and entered into agreements with: Mesa Homes (Now KI/FKLA Rancho Realty, LLC) 27555 Ynez Road, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92591 for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds posted posted by Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company in the following amounts: 1. Bond No. 3S 740 912 00 in the amount of $511,500 to cover street improvements Bond No. 3S 740 913 00 in the amount of $77,500 to cover water improvements. 3. Bond No. 3S 740 911 00 in the amount of $56,500 to cover sewer improvements. 4.. Bond No. 3S 740 910 O0 In the amount of $15,000 to cover subdivision monumentation. R:~AGDRPT~97~0513~TR21675F.ACC Bond No's. 3S 740 912 00, 3S 740 913 00, and 3S 740 911 00 in the amounts of $255, 750, $38,750, and $28,250, respectively, to cover materials and labor. The work has now been completed and Eastern Municipal and Rancho California Water Districts have accepted their items of work. Public Works Staff therefore recommends acceptance of the public improvements, reduction in Faithful Performance security amounts to the ten-percent warranty level, and initiation of the one-year warranty period. Therefore it is appropriate to reduce the Faithful Performance securities to the following warranty amounts: Street: $51,150 Water: $ 7,750 Sewer: $ 5.650 Total = $64,550 The Developer has submitted substitute bonds for faithful performance warranty security and labor and materials. The bonds have been posted by the Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. as follows: Faithful Performance Warranty Labor and Materials Bond No. 100869980-97-002 Bond No. 100869980-97-003 $ 64,550 $322,750 The subdivision monumentation requirements have been met, and Staff therefore recommends release of the following security: Subdivision Monumentation Bond No. 3S 740 910 00 in the amount of $15,000 The affected streets are being accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City Council Resolution No. 97- at this time. The streets within the subdivision to be accepted are Corte Montecito, Corte Positas, and a portion of Rancho Vista Road. That portion of Meadows Parkway within the tract boundary will not be accepted until such time as Communities Facilities District No. 88-3 and Assessment District No. 159 accept their phases of work. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: Location Map Substitute Securities (On file) R:~.GDRPT~9~0513 \TR216?SF.ACC VICINITY M4P '1 · ~ PADi~4 ~'57 ( 701.9F, N 4'6'00 O0 ~ Tract No. '7.167S-F Location Mag NOTE: MAPg NOT TO SCALE H'EM 11 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAl /~J,, Z'""- CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE DIREC~O~~ CITY MANAGER ~~. CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public May 13, 1997 Works/City Engineer Release Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Material Bonds in Tract No. 22962 ( Southeasterly of Winchester Road and Southwesterly of Nicolas Road) PREPARED BY: ~1~ Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council AUTHORIZE release of the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond riders and Labor and Material Bonds for Street, Drainage, Water, and Sewer Improvements in Tract No. 22962, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the developer and surety. BACKGROUND: On November 7, 1989, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision agreements with: Barratt American Inc., a Delaware Corporation. c/o Coscan Davidson Homes 12865 Pointe Del Mar Del Mar, CA 92014 for the improvement of streets and drainage, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by The American Insurance Company as follows: 1. Bond No. 11127028972 in the amount of $354,500 to cover street improvements. 2. Bond No. 11127028998 in the amount of $77,000 to cover water system improvements. 3. Bond No. 11127029004 in the amount of $93,500 to cover sewer system improvements. R:~A. GDRPT~97~0513~TR22962R.ELS Bonds No. 11127028972, 11127028998, and 11127029004 in the amount of $177,250, $38,500, and $46,750, respectively, to cover material and labor for street, water, and sewer improvements. 5. Bond No. 11127029160 in the amount of $20,800 to cover subdivision monumentation. On October 10, 1995, the City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the one- year warranty period, released the subdivision monumentation bond, and authorized reduction of the faithful performance bonds to the following warranty levels: Streets and Drainage improvements: Water System Improvements: Sewer System Improvements: Bond No. 11127028972 Bond No. 11127028998 Bond No. 11127029004 $35,450 $ 7,700 $ 9,350 Public Works staff has reviewed the project in the field and all necessary repairs/replacements have been satisfactorily completed. Staff therefore recommends that these warranty bonds now be released. The developer was required to post Material and Labor Bonds to ensure payment to suppliers and workers. The contractual lien period having run, and no claims filed, Staff recommends release of the following securities: Streets and Drainage Improvements Water System Improvements Sewer System Improvements Bond No. 11127028972 Bond No. 11127028998 Bond No. 11127029004 $177,250 $ 38,500 $ 46,750 The affected streets are Valeriana Court, and portions of Starling Street, Senna Court, and Swallow Court. These streets were accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City Council Resolution No. 95-94, on November 14, 1995. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachment: Location Map R:~AGDRPT~97~0513\TR22962R.ELS Project Site TRACT NO. 22962 Location Map TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPRC~VAI CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREC[I'O~B._~--~ .CITY MANAGER~/~?~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 13, 1997 Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Public Improvement Securities in Tract No. 23142. (Northeasterly of intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho California Road) PREPARED BY~ Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council ACCEPT the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement, and Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Securities for Street, Drainage, Water and Sewer Improvements, and Subdivision Monumentation in Tract No. 23142, AUTHORIZE the release of the faithful performance and labor and materials securities on file, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Sureties. BACKGROUND: On December 4, 1990, the City Council approved Tract Map No. 23142, and entered into subdivision agreements with: Vineyard Crest Development Partners, L.P., a California Limited Partnership 1784 La Costa Meadows Drive, # 106 San Marcos, CA 92069 for the improvement of streets and drainage, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were Instruments of Financial Obligation (set-aside letters) issued by Bank of the West as follows: In the amount of $255,500 ($187,000, $31,500, $28,500, and $8,500, respectively) to cover faithful performance for streets and drainage, water, and sewer improvements, and for subdivision monumentation. In the amount of $127,500 ($93,500, $16,000, and $14,500, respectively) to cover labor and materials for streets and drainage, water, and sewer improvements. Vineyard Crest Development Partners, L.P., sold the property subsequent to recording the tract map. The new developer for the subdivision is: Vineyard Crest, LLC 2201 Martin Street, Suite 107 Irvine, CA 92612 The new developer has submitted replacement agreement and securities for the contractual work. The substituted securities are bonds posted by Developer Insurance Company as follows: Bond No. 453332S in the total amount of $247,000 ($187,000, $31,500, and $28,500, respectively, for streets and drainage, water, and sewer improvements) to cover faithful performance. Bond No. 453332S in the total amount of $123,500 ($93,500, $16,500, and $14,500, respectively), for streets and drainage, water, and sewer improvements) to cover labor and materials. 3. Bond No. 453333S in the amount of $8,500 to cover subdivision monumentation. The contractual eighteen (18) month period for completion of the work under the original agreement (Vinecrest Crest Development Partners, L.P.) has expired. It is Staff's recommendation that the new developer (Vineyard Crest, LLC) be granted an eighteen (18) month construction completion period as set forth in the Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Section 20-"Time for Completion of Work/Time Extensions). The contractual completion date would be November 13, 1998. The affected street, although not completed or accepted, is a portion of Merlot Crest. FISCAL IMPACT: None AttAchments: Location Map Substitute Public Improvement Securities (on file) Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement (on file) 3 17 I~ Tract No. ~.3149~ ,ocation Man NOTIV,: MAPS NOT TO SCAI,E I~I'EM 13 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager APPRt~VAL (~, CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 13, 1997 Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Public Improvement Bonds in Tract No. 23992 ( Southerly of intersection of Rancho California Road at Ynez Road). PREPARED BY: 0~, Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development ~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council ACCEPT the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement, and Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for Street and Drainage, Water and Sewer System improvements, and Subdivision Monumentation and Traffic Signalization Mitigation Bonds in Tract No. 23992, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Developers and Sureties. BACKGROUND: On March 12, 1991, the City Council approved Tract Map No. 23992, and entered into subdivision agreements with: Bedford Development Co. for the improvement of street and drainage, installation of water and sewer systems, and subdivision monumentation, and traffic signalization mitigation fees. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were Surety Bonds posted by Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company as follows: Bond No. 3S 741 792 in the total amount of $648,000 ($524,000, $76,500, and $47,500, for street and drainage, water, and sewer, respectively) for faithful performance. Bond No. 3S 741 792 in the total amount of $324,000 ($262,000, $38, 250, and $23,750, for street and drainage, water, and sewer, respectively) for labor and materials. 3. Bond No. 3S 741 743 in the amount of $11,000 for subdivision monumentation. R:~AGDRPT~97~0513\TR23992.SU8 Bedford Development Co. sold the property subsequent to recording the tract map. The new developer for the subdivision is: Rancho California Highlands II, LLC 29400 Rancho California Road Temecula, CA 9259? The new developer has submitted replacement agreements and bonds for the contractual work, including a bond for the Traffic Signalization Mitigation fees. The substituted and new securities are surety bonds posted by Insurance Company of the West as follows: Bond No. 148 56 26 in the total amount of $648,000 ($788,000, $187,000, and $199,000, respectively, for streets and drainage, water systems, and sewer systems) to cover faithful performance. Bond No. 148 56 26 in the total amount of $324,000 ($394,000, $93,500, and $99,500, respectively, for streets and drainage, water systems, and sewer systems) to cover labor and materials. 3. Bond No. 148 56 27 in the amount of $11,000 to cover subdivision monumentation. Bond No. 148 56 28 in the amount of $61,325 to cover traffic signalization mitigation fees. The contractual eighteen (18) month period for completion of the work under the original agreement (Bedford Development Co.) has expired. It is Staff's recommendation that the new developer (Rancho California Highlands II, LLC) be granted a twelve (12) month construction completion period as set forth in the Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Section 20-"Time for Completion of Work/Time Extensions). The contractual completion date would be May 13, 1998. The affected streets, although not completed or accepted, are portions of Rancho Highlands Drive, Tierra Vista Road, Rancho California Road, and Ynez Road. Both Rancho California Road and Ynez Road were part of the County-Maintained Road System prior to incorporation and therefore became part of the City Maintained-Street System by succession December 1, 1989. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: Location Map Substitute Bonds (on file) Substitute Agreements (on file) R:~AGDRFT~97~.0~ 13~,TR23992. SUB Tract No. ~.399~. Location Mag NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCA!,F, TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPRt3VA! c, Y ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREC~~ CITY MANAGER ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 13, 1997 Acceptance of the Grant of a Drainage Easement over a Portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 22554, abutting Tract No 20879-F (located north of Rancho California Road and east of Meadows Parkway) PREPARED BY: ~/Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING THE GRANT OF A STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 22554, ABUTTING TRACT NO. 20879-F. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to Condition of Approval No. 12 for Tract No. 23142, the developer was required to "protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing facilities or by securing a drainage easement'. The drainage design is adequate to protect the abutting property downstream and the developer has negotiated with the downstream owner to obtain a drainage easement and permission to take access to the drainage easement for construction and maintenance purposes. This system will continue the discharge along natural drainage courses to future connection(s) to be constructed by the developer responsible for the Meadows Parkway street/drainage improvements offsite to the Tract No.23142 development. Attached is the offsite owner's Grant of Drainage Easement with Exhibits "A" and "B" for approval and execution. Acceptance of the easement does not commit the City to maintain the drainage facilities until the improvements for Tract No. 23142 are completed and accepted by the City Council. R:~AGDR.F~97~05 ! 3 \TR23142D .RAN FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time. Interim maintenance costs estimated at $200 per fiscal year pending completion of the abutting development and related drainage system into Meadows Parkway. AttRchments: 1. Location Map. 2. Grant of Drainage Easement. R:~GDRPT~9T~0$13\TR23142D.RAN Tract No. 9.3149. Off~ite l)rainaEe Ea.~e. ment Location Map NOTE,: MAPS NOT TO SCAT,F,, RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA OFFICE P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92989-9033 (Space for Recorder's Use) GRANT OF DRAINAGE EASEMENT BRAMALEA CALn~ORNIA, LLC, a California limited liability company, grant(s) to the CITY OF TEMECULA an easement for drainage purposes, over, upon, across, and within the real property in the City of Temecula, State of California, described on attached Exhibit "A" and depicted on attached Exhibit "B". Together with permission to enter upon Parcel 1 of said Parcel Map No. 22554 for the purposes of maintenance of the drainage facilities lying within said drainage easemere. Dated: Notary Jurat(s): may be attached on separate page(s) BRAMALEA CALIFORNIA, LLC, a C alifomi//~ted l iab~ c ompan~,~ ~ /' Tide: C/vi ce Name: ~larc Chasman Title: 021397-0958 / J33659-001/60418.2 EXHIBIT STORM DRAIN EASEMENT DEDICATION OF A STORM DRAIN EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 22554 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 147, PAGES 94-98 OF MAPS IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A 20.00 FOOT STRIP OF LAND, THE CENTERLINE OF WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF TRACT 20879, AS RECORDED IN MAP BOOK 169, PAGES 16-19, OF MAPS IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID TRACT MAP 20879, SOUTH 03°50'22" WEST, 86.01 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE: SOUTH 51°30'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET TO THE TERMINATION OF THE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT. THE SIDE LINES OF SAID 20.00 FOOT STRIP OF LAND SHALL BE LENGTHENED OR SHORTENED AS NECESSARY TO MEET THE SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF TRACT 20879. EXHIBIt" "B" .~ I=01NT OF · LCO-,F J BEGINNING I£'I'iNG DRAINAGE EA,~EMENT PER JN~"T. NO. 149532. PEC. MAY 28, 1987 LOT .48 .,..-- LOT STATE OF CAI.IFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE On ~3r'~ [ I , 1997, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared and 3/ vc personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same m his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the person or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Comm. Notary Public (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) $$. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) On , 1997, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared and , personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the person or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public (SEAL) 021397-0958 / J33659-001 / 60418.2 RESOLUTION NO. 9% A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING THE GRANT OF DRAINAGE EAS~ OVER A PORTION OF PARC~. 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 22554, ABIYrTING TRACT NO. 20879-F. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOF..S RESOLVE, DE--"I~RMIIq'E AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, Bramalea California, LLC, a California limited liability company, has granted to the City a easement for drainage purposes over a portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 22554; and, WI:ri~E4,S, the City of Temecula required that such drainage easement be granted to the City for drainage purposes offsite to Tract No 23142; and, WI:rEREAS, access to said drainage easement lies over additional land owned by the Grantor for which the Grantor has also granted permission to enter upon said Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 22554 for maintenance purposes: and, WI:~ERF_~, the City desires to accept the Drainage Easement for that portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 22554 as offered; NOW, T~_,REFORE, BE IT RF~OLVED that the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accepts the Grant of Drainage l~ment for that portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 22554 described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto, and acknowledges permission granted to enter upon said Parcel I for maintenance purposes. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOS, by the City Council of the City of Temeeula at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of May, 1997. Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor R:kAGDRFI~97~0513\TR23 ! 42D.RAN ATrEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEXL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMF_.CULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 97- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of May, 1997, by the following vote: COUNCILlVI~MBERS: NOES: COUNCIL~MBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: - COUNCILIV[EMBERS: R:~AGDRFr~97~0513\TR23142D.RAN EXHIBIT 'A' TO RESOLUTION NO. 97- Accepting the Offer of Grant of Drainage Easement over e portion of Parcel I of Parcel Map No. 22554 abutting Tract No. 20879-F. {Legal description attached} EXHIBIT "A" STORM DRAIN EASEMENT DEDICATION OF A STORM DRAIN EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 22554 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 147, PAGES 94-98 OF MAPS IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A 20.00 FOOT STRIP OF LAND, THE CENTERLINE OF WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF TRACT 20879, AS RECORDED IN MAP BOOK t69, PAGES 16-19, OF MAPS IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID TRACT MAP 20879, SOUTH 03°50'22" WEST, 86.01 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE: SOUTH 51°30'00'* WEST, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET TO THE TERMINATION OF THE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT. THE SIDE LINES OF SAID 20.00 FOOT STRIP OF LAND SHALL BE LENGTHENED OR SHORTENED AS NECESSARY TO MEET THE SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF TRACT 20579. EXHIBIT 'B' TO RESOLUTION NO. 97- SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE - DRAINAGE EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 22554 ABUTTING TRACT NO. 20879oF. (Plat Attached) EXHIBIT "B" ?M No' N .6f30'OO"E 60.00' ,~./.- POINT OF 'LoT ~ TRUE POINT OF / BEGhNNIN.c~' /- BEGINNING X!STING DRAINAGE EASEMENT PER INST. NO. 149532, REC. MAY 28, 1987' // LOT .46 LOT CITY OF TEMECULA, CAL! FORN!A THIS PLAT I$ ~ Im y a~l AID IN LOCATIN~ ~ p _N~C~/.($) DF.,~I~ED IN THE A'~AC~E/) DO~. IT IS NOT A PART OF THE ~ITTEN D~SCRIPTIOd I'HEf~I~. SHF.~T i ~ I SCALE: 1'- 40' t DRAMq BY, W. O. DATE FEB-14,19971 SUBJECT: STORM DRAIN EASEMENT I'~'EM 15 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY MANAGER CiTY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 13, 1997 Acceptance of Public Streets into the City Maintained-Street System {Within Tracts No. 21675-5 and 21675-F). (Westerly of the intersection of Rancho Vista Road. at Meadows Parkway) PREPARED BY: .~. Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer- Land Development /~,,Albert K,. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM, {WITHIN TRACTS NO. 21675-6 AND 21675-F) BACKGROUND: The City Council approved Tracts No. 21675-5 and 21675-F on July 3, 1990, and entered into Subdivision Agreements for construction of street, water and sewer improvements with Mesa Homes (Now KI/FKLA Rancho Realty, LLC). The City Council accepted the public improvements for these tracts on May 13, 1997. The public streets now being accepted by this action are: Tract No. 21675-6: Corte Rosario and Calle Santa Aria. Tract No. 21675-F: Corte Montecito, Corte Positas, and portion of Rancho Vista Road. FISCAl IMPACT: Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 years. Attachments: Resolution No. 97- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive. R:~GDRFT~7~0513\TR216756.FST RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEl'tING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO ~ CITY MAINTAINED~TREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 21675-6 AND 21675-F) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF_.C~ DOES RESOLVE, D~ AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: ~, The City Council accepted offers of dedication of certain lots for public road and public utility purposes made by Mesa Homes (Now KI/FKLA Rancho Realty, LLC), with the recordation of Tract Maps No. 21675-6 and 21675-F; and, WHEREAS, The City of Temecula accepted the improvements within Tracts No 21675-6 and 21675-F on May 8, 1997. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temccula hereby accepts into the City Maintained-Street System those streets or portions of streets offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPT!~, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of May, 1997. Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk R:kAGDR. PT~97~0513\TR216756 .FST [SEAL] STATE OF CALII:ORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TF_,MECUI~ ) I, June $. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 97- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of May, 1997, by the following vote: 0 COUNCILMEMBF_2,S: NOES: 0 COUNCILlVIEMB~: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILM~MBERS: ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCKfVIEMBERS: R:kAGDRPT~97~0513~,TR216756 .FST EXHIBIT ~A~ TO RESOLUTION NO. 97- Accepting the public streets offered to and accepted by the City of Temeoda as indicated on Tract Maps No. 21675-5 and 21675- F, and accepting subject public streets into the City Maintained- Street System as described below: Tract Ma~O No. ~1675-6: Those lots described as Lots "A" and 'B', as shown on Tract Map No. 21675-6, f'ded on the 18th of July, 1990, in Book 221 of Maps, Pgs 38-42 inclusive, further described as follows: Lot Lot Corte Santa Ana Corte Rosario Tract Map No. ~.1675-F: Those lots described as Lots 'A", 'C", and 'D" as shown on Tract Map No. 21675-F, ~ed on the 18th of July, 1990, in Book 221 of Maps, Pgs 43-48 inclusive, further described as follows: Lot Lot 'B" ** Lot Lot 'D Portion of Rancho Vista Road Portion of Meadows Parkway Corte Positas Corte Montecito ** Meadows Parkway will not be accepted into the City Maintained-Street System until Community Facilities District No. 88-3 and Assessment District No. 159 accept their portions of the improvements. R:~AGDRl~97~0513\TR216756 .FST ~Cglllrr "B" TO RESOLWI~ON NO. 97- SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE -PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW: V/C/NITY It,f,41~ £0,40 21 9~ NOTF~: MAP~ NOT TO SCAI,E STREETS OR PORTIONS OF STREETS TO BE ACCEPTED I~TO CITY MA/NTA-rHED-STRP-ET SYSTEM H'EM 16 APPRnVA! CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER )~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Council/City Manager ,//~Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 13, 1997 SUBJECT: Award of Construction Contract for the FY96-97 Street Striping Program, Project No. PW97-01 PREPARED BY: ~ Bradley A. Buron, Maintenance Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Award a contract for Project No. PW97-01, FY96-97 Street Striping Program, to Pacific Striping, Inc. for $76,685.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $7,668.50 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. BACKGROUND: On March 18, 1997 the City Council approved plans and specifications and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public bids for the annual FY96-97 Street Striping Program. The Street Striping Program includes the re-painting of street striping twice per year in order to insure visibility and reflectiveness of street striping. The engineer's estimate for this project was $97,000.00. Six (6) bids were publicly opened on April 17, 1997 and results are as follows: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Base Bid Pacific Striping, Inc ............................. $76,685.00 Orange County Striping .......................... $90,325.00 Sudhakar Company, Inc .......................... $93,930.00 C-18, Inc .................................... $96,778.00 Paving Contractors, Inc .......................... $108,150.00 Safety Striping Service, Inc ....................... $146,870.00 r.\agdrpt\97~0513\pw97-01 .awd/ajp The construction schedule is a yearly contract with work beginning in June, 1997 and November, 1997. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: The project is being funded from the Public Works Traffic Division Striping/Stenciling Account No. 001-164-602-5410 and Street Maintenance Striping/Stenciling Account No. 001-164-601- 5410. The total project is $84,353.50 which included the contract amount of $76,685.00 plus 10% contingency of $7,668.50. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Exhibit "A"- Scope of Work 5. Contract r:\agdrpt\97\0513\1~w97-01 .awd/ajp SCOPF OF WORK PROJECT NO. PW97-01 FY96-97 STREET STRIPING PROGRAM EXHIBIT 'A' The work to be done consists of furnishing all materials, equipment, tools, labor and incidentals as required by the Contract Documents to construction for the above-stated project. The general items of work include: 2. 3. 4. Painting reflective center lines and lane lines Removing of center lines and lane lines Pre-lining Placements of raised pavement markings ~agdrpt\97~0318~pw97-O1 .bidlajp CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. PW97-O 1 FY 96-97 STREET STRIPING PROGRAM THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 13th day of May, 1997, by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and Pacific Striping, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: 1.a CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW97- 01\FY 96-97 STREET STRIPING PROGRAM, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard SDecifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW97-01\FY 96-97 STREET STRIPING PROGRAM. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building News, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General, Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW97- 01\FY 96-97 STREET STRIPING PROGRAM. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Document describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: PROJECT NO. PW97-01\FY 96-97 STREET STRIPING PROGRAM All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: SEVENTY SIX THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED EIGHTY FIVE DOLLARS and NO CENTS {$76,685.00}, the total amount of the base bid. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed May 13, 1995 {280) working days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. PAYMENTS. Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests. Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the City, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after completion of the work and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY. R:\cip\projects\pw97\13w97-01 \contract.doc/ajp Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference, WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule: CONTRACT AMOUNT $25,000- ~75,000 $75,000- $500,000 Over $500,000 RETENTION PERIOD 180 days 180 days One Year RETENTION PERCENTAGE 3% $2,250 + 2% of amount in excess of $75,000 $10,750 + 1% of amount in excess of $500,000 10. LI(3UIDATFD DAMAGES: EXTENSION OF TIMF. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. R:\ci~3~Droiects\Dw97\!~w97-O 1 \contract.doc/eio 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. TIME OF THE FSSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. NOTICE TO CITY OF I ABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. 4 R:\cip\projects\pw97\pw97-01 \contract.doclajp 19. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 20. GOVERNING ! AW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by the law of the State of California. 21. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula Post Office Box 9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92589-9033 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR Pacific Striping, Inc. P.O. Box 1691 Whittier, California 90609 (310) 945-7805 By: Scott Fisher Print or type NAME President Print or type TITLE DATED: CITY OF TEMECULA By: Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk R:\ciD\Droiects\DW97\Dw97-01 ~contrecf H~C/~;~ ITEM 17 CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREC~OR~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager May 13, 1997 Approval of Amendment to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an Amendment to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement creating the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency. DISCUSSION: The RCHCA Board of Directors has unanimously endorsed the attached JPA amendment, and is requesting approval by the governing bodies of RCHCA member agencies. Section 3.21 of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency ('JPA") currently provides that the JPA"...shall not be amended except by an agreement in writing signed by all parties." Since the agency is comprised of the County of Riverside and the Cities of Corona, Hemet, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, Murrieta, Perris, Riverside, and Temecula, this provision precludes any amendments to the JPA unless all nine member agencies agree. In effect, this permits any individual member agency to veto proposed JPA amendments on which all of the other eight member agencies agree. The proposed JPA amendment hereto provides that the JPA may be amended upon the written agreement of not less than two-thirds of the total number of member agencies comprising at least fifty percent of the total voting strength of the Board of Directors. The RCHCA Board of Directors has unanimously endorsed the JPA Agreement. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency City of Corona · City of Hemet · City of Lake Elsinore · City of Moreno Valley · City of Murrieta City of Perris · City of Riverside · City of Temecula · County of Riverside April 1, 1997 Mr. Ron Bradley City Manager City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO THE JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION AGENCY Dear Mr. Bradley: Section 3.21 of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency ("JPA") currently provides that the JPA "...shall not be amended except by an agreement in writing signed by all parties." Since the agency is comprised of the County of Riverside and the Cities of Corona, Hemet, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, Murrieta, Perris, Riverside, and Temecula, this provision precludes any amendments to the JPA unless all nine member agencies agree. In effect, this permits any individual member agency to veto proposed JPA amendments on which all of the other eight member agencies agree. In fact, since the creation of the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency ("RCHCA") in 1990, that situation has occurred on more than one occasion. In order to establish a more equitable process for amending the JPA, the RCHCA Board of Directors has unanimously endorsed the attached JPA amendment, and has directed me to forward that document for approval by the governing bodies of RCHCA member agencies. The proposed JPA amendment attached hereto provides that the JPA may be amended upon the written agreement of not less than two-thirds of the total number of member agencies comprising at least fifty percent of the total voting strength of the Board of Directors. As you may recall, the JPA provides that the vote of each member of the RCHCA Board of Directors shall be weighted in direct proportion to the financial contributions made to the agency. On behalf of the RCHCA Board of Directors, I am respectfully requesting that your governing body consider the recommended JPA amendment at your earliest convenience. If approval is granted, I would ask that you please have all enclosed signature pages executed by the officials indicated, and return all executed documents to me. The RCHCA will then compile all documents and forward a fully executed version for your files. 4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Telephone: (909) 275-1100 Fax: (909) 275-1105 Thank you very much for your prompt consideration of this matter. If you or any members of your staff have questions concerning the proposed JPA amendment please contact me at 275-1100. Sincerely, Brian Loew Executive Director Encls. cc: City Managers, City Council members, and City Attorneys 4080 Lemon Street, 121~ Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Telephone: (909) 275-1100 Fax: (909) 275-1105 AMENDMENT TO THE JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION AGENCY THIS AMENDMENT TO THE JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION AGENCY ("Amendment") is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF CORONA, the CiTY OF HEMET, the CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, the CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, the CITY OF MURRIETA, the CITY OF PERRIS, the CITY OF RIVERSIDE, the CITY OF TEMECULA, and the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE (collectively referred to as the "Parties" or the "Member Agencies"). RECITALS WHEREAS, each of the Parties are members of the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency ("RCHCA"); and, WHEREAS, the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating the RCHCA, dated June 12, 1990 and each of the subsequent amendments thereto (collectively, the "Agreement") have been duly approved and executed by the Parties, and constitute the primary document which governs the affairs of the RCHCA; and, WHEREAS, Section 3.21 of the Agreement currently provides that the Agreement may not be amended except by an agreement signed by all parties; and, WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement to provide that it may be amended by less than all of the parties. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Parties do hereby agree as follows: Section 3.21 of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: "3.21 Amendment. This Agreement contains all of the terms and conditions agreed to by and between the parties hereto and shall not be amended except by an agreement in writing signed by not less than two- thirds (2.13) of the total number of Member Agencies comprising at least fifty percent (50%) of the total voting strength of the Board of Directors."; o The terms and conditions of the Agreement not expressly modified by this Amendment shall continue in full force and effect; This Amendment shall become effective on the date that execution of this Amendment is authorized by the last of the governing bodies of the Member Agencies. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment as of the date last set forth below and agree to abide by its terms from that date forward. Dated: ATTEST: CITY OF CORONA By: City Clerk Mayor Dated: ATTEST: CITY OF HEMET By: City Clerk Mayor Dated: ATTEST: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE By: City Clerk Mayor Dated: ATTEST: CITY OF MORENO VALLEY By: City Clerk Mayor Dated: ATTEST: CITY OF MURRIETA By: City Clerk Mayor Dated: ATTEST: City Clerk Dated: ATTEST: City Clerk Dated: ATTEST: City Clerk Dated: ATTEST: Clerk of the Board CITY OF PERR!S By: Mayor CITY OF RIVERSIDE By: Mayor CITY OF TEMECULA By: Mayor COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE By: Chairman of the Board of Supervisors ITEM 18 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager May 13, 1997 Official Pageant Recognition RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council recognize the Temecula Valley Pageant Title Holders as Official Temecula Representatives of the City of Temecula. DISCUSSION: The Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors (TVCC) is requesting that the Pageant Title Holders be recognized as Official Temecula Representatives by the City of Temecula. The Pageant Title Holders represent the City at events such as the 4th of July Parade, Holiday Lights Parade, Ribbon Cutting Ceremonies, and several other events in Temecula since 1967. Because the Title Holders are highly visible throughout the community, the TVCC Board is requesting that the Title Holders be formally recognized by the City of Temecula. FISCAL IMPACT: None. April 21, 1997 Mary Jane McLamey City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 27450 Ynez Rd., Suite 104 Temecula, CA 92591 Phone (909) 676-5090 · Fax (909) 694-0201 RE: Official Pageant Recognition As per our conversation on Thursday, April 17, 1997, the TVCC Board of Directors would like to request that the Temecula Valley Pageant Title Holders be recognized as Official Temecula Representatives by the City of Temecula. As you know, our Pageant Title Holders represent the City at events such as the 4th of July Parade, Holiday Lights Parade, Ribbon Cutting Ceremonies, and several other events in Temecula. Because the Title Holders are highly visible throughout the community, the TVCC Board agreed that the Title Holders should be formally recognized by the City of Temecula. Perhaps an appreciation certificate presented at a City Council Meeting would be appropriate. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (909) 676- 5090. If possible, I would like to respond to our Board Members before the next Board Meeting on May 8, 1997. Sincerely, Executive Director ITEM 19 ORDINANCE NO. 97-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(d) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE PRIMA FACIIg SPEED LIMIT ON (1) YNEZ ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD (2) DEL REY ROAD AND VIA NORTE (3) MORAGA ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA AND MARGARITA ROAD (4) MARGARITA ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH (5) JEFFERSON AVENUE BETWEEN WINCHESTER ROAD AND NORTH CITY LIMITS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The City of Temecula finds and determines that from time to time it is necessary to add or modify existing prima facie speed limits within the City for certain streets, or parts of streets. WHEREAS, the City conducts engineering and traffic surveys on its roadways in order to determine the appropriate speed limit; WHEREAS, the engineering and traffic surveys on the segments of roadways designated in this Ordinance indicate that the speed limit should remain the same and, therefore, the intent of the Council is to re-affirm the speed limits given the new engineering and traffic study. SECTION 1. Section 10.28.010(d) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows to modify the declared prima facie speed limits only on the following streets: "Name of Street and Portion Affected Ynez Road between Rancho California Road and Winchester Road Del Rey Road (entire length) Declared Prima Facie Speed Limit. Miles Per Hour 45 35 Ords\ 97-05 I Via Norte (eraire length) 35 Moraga Road between Rancho California Road and Margarita Road 40 Margarita Road between Rancho California Road and State Route 79 South. 45 Jefferson Avenue between Winchester Road and North City Limits 50 Except as specifically set forth in this Section 1, all other provisions of Section 10.28.010(d) shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 2. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places. SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City Councilmembers voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City. Ords\ 97-05 2 PASSED APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of May, 1997. Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVE~IDE ) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 97-05 was duly introduced and placed upon its fu'st reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 22rid day of April, 1997, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 13th day of May, 1997, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk Ords\ 97-05 3 ITEM 20 ORDINANCE NO. 97-0~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AND TItE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO MAKE CHANGES TO TABLE 17.08(a) OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND TABLE I OF THE OLD TOWN SPECIYIC PLAN TO ALLOW "FORTUNE TELTJNG, OR SIMILAR ACTIVITY' AS PERMITrED USES RATHER THAN CONDmONALLY PERMrlTED USES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ~, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ]~EREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findi%gs. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following findings: A. That Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities to implement such general plan as may be in effect in any such city; and B. That there is a need to amend the Development Code and the Old Town Specific Plan to ensure its clarity and completeness; and C. That this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances. D. The said uses do not have any special uniqueness or impacts on the surrounding uses to require Conditional Use Permits for them. Section 2. Table 17.08(a) of the Development Code is hereby amended to replace the current line for "Fortune Telling, Spiritualism, or Similar Activity" with the following: NC CC HT SC PO BP LI Fortune Telling, or Similar Activity P P P P P P Ord~\97-06 1 Section 3. Table 1 of the Old Town Specific Plan is hereby amended to replace the current line for "Fortune Telling, Spiritualism, or Similar Activity" with the following: Fortune Telling or Similar Activity TSR HTC OTC TRC TSO CCTS CC -o P - p P P P Psychic/ Fortune Telling -- P - P P P P Section 4. Section 5.04.050 (63) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended by deleting therefrom the last sentence which reads ~Additionally, a special permit from the city manager must be obtained'. Section 5. Environmental Determination The City Council hereby determines that these amendments to the Development Code and the Old Town Specific Plan do not have the potential to cause a significant impact on the environment. Any potential impacts associated with the Development Code and the Old Town Specific Plan were included in the previous Negative Declarations for the Development Code and Zoning Map and the Old Town Specific Plan, as well as the Final Environmental Impact Report of the City General Plan for the City and its environs. Further, these projects are exempt from California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. This section of the CEQA Guidelines indicates that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. It also states, where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. These projects comply with the requirements for this section as there is no possibility that the adoption of these amendments may have a significant effect on the environment. Section 6. Severability The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or Section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 7. Effective Date This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. ~ta\97.-06 2 Section 8. PASSI~, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 13th day of May, 1997. Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor AT'FF_ST: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) $S CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 97-06 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 22nd day of April, 1997, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 13th day of May, by the following roll call vote: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk 0rd~\97-06 ~ ITEM 21 ORDINANCE NO. 97-07 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 9.14 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, PROHIBITING THE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND POSSESSION OF OPEN CONTAINERS OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN PUBLIC PLACES, AND SECTION 9.02.010, PROHIBITING ENGAGING IN CERTAIN BODILY FUNCTIONS IN CERTAIN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PLACES, AND ~ING SECTION 12.04.210 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REL&TING TO CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN CITY PARKS AND FACILITIES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. read as follows: Chapter 9.14 is hereby added to the Temecula Municipal Code to "Chapter 9.14 "CONSUMPTION AND POSSESSION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES PROHIBITED IN CERTAIN PUBLIC PLACES 9.14.010 9.14.020 9.14.030 "9.14.010 Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Places Prohibited. Possession of Open Containers of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Places Prohibited. Cons-mption of Alcoholic Beverages on Homeowner Association Properties Prohibited. Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Prohibited "The drinking of beer, wine, liquor, fermented malt beverage, intoxicating liquor, or other alcoholic beverage shall be prohibited at the following locations, unless specifically permitted by the prior written approval of the City: "(a) On any public street, roadway, boulevard, alley, parking lot, sidewalk, or any other property owned, controlled and/or operated by the City, County or any public agency; "Co) In the public parking, loading, access, and common areas of any commercial shopping center; except on the premises of a commercial establishment holding a valid on-sale license or permit from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control; or Orda\97-07 1 '(c) Within any public park, re~eafional area, or recreation facility owned, controlled and/or operated by the City, County, or any public agency. "9.14,020 Possession of Open containers of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Places Prohibited. *No person s~all have in his or her possession, with intent to consume any part of the contents thereof, any bottle, can or other receptacle containing beer, wine, liquor, fermented malt beverage, intoxicating liquor, or other alcoholic beverage, which has been opened, or a seal broken, or the contents of which have been partially removed, at the following locations, unless specifically permitted by the prior written approval of the City: "(a) On any public street, roadway, boulevard, alley, parking lot, sidewalk, or any other property owned, controlled and/or operated by the City, County or any public agency; "(b) In the public parking, loading, access, and common areas of any commercial shopping center; except on the premises of a corninertial establishment holding a valid on-sale license or permit from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control; or "(c) Within any public park, recreational area, or recreation facility owned, controlled and/or operated by the City, County, or any public agency. "9.14.030 Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages on Homeowner Association Properties Prohibited. "No person shall drink any beer, wine, liquor, fermented malt beverage, intoxicating liquor, or other alcoholic beverage, upon property, including greenbelt areas, common walkways, and common driveways, owned or controlled by a homeowner's association where: "(a) The homeowner's association has requested in writing that the City extend its drinking prohibition upon the homeowner's association property and the City Council has adopted a resolution approving such request; and "(b) The homeowner's association has posted on the property a notice in substantially the following form: "Drinking of liquors, beers, wine or other intoxicating beverages on this property, including greenbelt areas, common walkways, and common driveways, in prohibited by Chapter 9.14 of the Temecula Municipal Code and violators are subject to criminal prosecution which could result in imprisonment and a fine." R¢sos\97-07 2 Section 2. Chapter 9.02, General, and Section 9.02.010 are hereby added to the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows: "CHAPTER 9.02 GENERAL "9.02.010 Bodily Functions Prohibited in Certain Public Areas "No person shall urinate or defeca~ on private property in any area exposed to the public view, or on any public street, roadway, boulevard, alley, parking lot, sidewalk, or any other property owned, controlled and/or operated by the City, County or any public agency, except in a public or private restroom" Section 3. Section 12.04.210 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "12.04.210 Alcoholic Beverages. "a. In accordance with the provisions of Chapter 9.14, Consumption and Possession of Alcoholic Beverages Prohibited in Certain Public Places, the Commission is hereby designated as the body to approve, conditionally approve or deny requests to consume or possess alcoholic beverages in City parks. "b. 1. In accordance with the provisions of Chapter 9.14, Consumption and Possession of Alcoholic Beverages Prohibited in Certain Public Places, the Director, or his or her designee, is hereby designated as the person to approve, conditionally approve or deny requests to consume or possess alcoholic beverages at any indoor city public facility. A temporary license from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, and proof of one million dollars liquor liability insurance coverage and liability insurance coverage identifying the city of Temecula as additional insured, is also required for any such permit. "2. No person under the age of twenty-one is permitted to consume alcoholic beverages in any city park or facility. "3. Security may be required for events in which alcohol is served, depending upon the type of event at the discretion of the Director. "c. Sale and Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Special Use Parks. "1. In accordance with the provisions of Chapter 9.14, Consumption and Possession of Alcoholic Beverages Prohibited in Certain Public Places, the Director, or his or her designee, is hereby designated as the person to approve, conditionally approve or deny requests to consume or possess alcoholic beverages at a special use park. "2. Alcoholic beverages must be consumed in designated areas. R~aoa\97-07 3 '3. A temporary license from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, one million dollars liquor liability insurance and liability insurance identifying the city of Temecula as additional insured is also required for any such permit. "4. No person under the age of twenty-one is permitted to consume alcoholic beverages in any special use park. "5. Security will be required for events in which alcohol is sold, as well as events where alcohol is not served. ~ Section 2. If any sentence, chuse or phra~ of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each sentence, chuse or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid. Section 3. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and posted in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of May, 1997. Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk 1~o~\97-07 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June $. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 97-07 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 22nd day of April 1997, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 13th day of May, 1997 by the following vote, to wit: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILM]~_NIBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk R¢sos\97-07 5 Joint Meeting of the City Council, RDA & Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority ITEM 1 APPROV~i~ ~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICEP~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: By: TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Board Members Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manger May 13, 1997 AB 1290 Redevelopment Status Report John Meyer, Senior Planner ~ RECOMMENDATION: 1. 2. It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency Board: Receive and File Implementation Plan Status Report Take public testimony relative to the implementation of Redevelopment and Implementation Plan. Provide direction on related policy issues. the PURPOSE The purpose of this public hearing is to meet the requirements of the Community Redevelopment Law Reform Act of 1993 (AB 1290). AB 1290, effective January 1, 1994, enacted numerous revisions to the California Redevelopment Law including a requirement for the adoption of an Implementation Plan. The Temecula Redevelopment Agency adopted its first Implementation Plan in November 1994. In accordance with Health and Safety Code §33490, a public hearing must be conducted to hear testimony of all interested parties relative to the Redevelopment Plan and the Implementation Plan at least once within the five year term of the Implementation Plan. P:.\CRISPD\I2~OR.~V.UPD 516/97 ,~ 1 The attached Status Report will provide an accounting of all Redevelopment activities in the categories of: Marketing/Promotion, Housing, and Capital Improvements. Additionally Staff is seeking direction on policy matters as they affect the ongoing implementation of the Old Town Specific Plan, Redevelopment Plan and Implementation Plan. BACKGROUND: The three pertinent documents affecting the redevelopment area were adopted as follows: Redevelopment Plan Old Town Specific Plan AB 1290 Implementation Plan Economic Development Strategic Plan July 1988 February 1994 November 1994 October 1996 All four documents provide general guidance for the development and implementation of Redevelopment Activities. The five year goals of the Redevelopment program as stated in the Implementation Plan are as follows: Provide a broad range of public infrastructure improvements to induce private investment in the Project Area. Enhance the public safety and welfare by providing improved community services. Promote the preservation and enhancement of Old Town Temecula. Promote expansion of the industrial and commercial economic and job bases. Preserve, improve and expand housing opportunities for low and moderate income residents. As detailed in the attached report, the Redevelopment Agency has created many programs and completed many projects that have moved the City forward in achieving the Five Year Goals. The City's Marketing Program has been very successful in recruiting and expanding businesses to and in the community. The Housing Program, which has been in affect for about one year has already made significant strides in the preservation, rehabilitation, and creation of affordable housing units. Capital Improvements continue to be undertaken and completed that eliminate blight and replace of inadequate public improvements and facilities. POLICY DIRECTION Staff is seeking policy direction on the following issues relating to the implementation of the Redevelopment Implementation Plan. Streetscape Improvements Maintenance Costs To date the City Council has approved a budget of $3 million for the design and construction of streetscape improvements. Due to the nature of the improvements contemplated, (wooden sidewalks and enhanced street furnishings) the incremented maintenance costs above that for standard city street/sidewalk improvements are estimated to be $100,000 annually. The P:~CRLqPD~I290REV.UPD 5/'7197 d~ 2 options for funding these increased maintenance costs include: Include the incremented maintenance costs in the City's annual budget to be funded by the General Fund; and/or, Assess benefitting property and business owners for the incremented costs of maintenance by means of a Business Improvement District or other assessment vehicle. Staff is seeking direction from the Council regarding the funding of maintenance costs. Facade Improvement Program In light of the proposed phasing of the Old Town Entertainment project, staff believes added emphasis should be placed on some of the existing programs. To increase the participation of the Facade'Improvement Program staff is recommending the addition of a $10,000 Assistance Package, from now through June 31, 1998. The terms of this package would be a $5,000 grant with a $5,000 loan forgiven at the end of five years. Staff recommends that applicants be encouraged to use the loan, rebate and assistance programs concurrently. Staff also recommends that the terms of the rebate program be modified to allow direct payment to the contractor similar to our Residential Rehab Programs. Streetscape Construction Mitigation Program The construction of the streetscape improvements are likely to have a temporary impact on the local businesses in Old Town. A better understanding of specific impacts as they relate to traffic, access, noise and dust will be better understood when the traffic control plan is developed by City consultants. The Council may wish to recommend that staff develop a mitigation program which will assist the Old Town Merchants to mitigate some of the temporary adverse impacts that are expected to be experienced during the construction period. Redevelopment Small Business Commercial Rehabilitation Loan Program In 1993 the Agency approved a small business loan program. The program was instituted to provide maximum of $100,000 in loan funds to small businesses. To date, the Agency has funded 5 loans totaling $309,400. In the last six months, we have received no applications for loans. We attribute the lack of interest to the availability of financing from other sources, such as SBA Commercial Loans. Therefore, staff is recommending that the Agency eliminate this program. FISCAL IMPACTS The programs included in this report have been included in the appropriate budgets except for the Streetscape Improvement Maintenance costs. Attachment: 1. Status Report - Page 4 P:\CRISPD\I290REV.UPD $/"//9'/a,. 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 STATUS REPORT P:ACR.ISPD~1290REV.UPD 5~7/97 d~ 4 The Rede. elopmen~ Agency of ~he City of Temet,ula STATUS REPORT on Retle.elopment Aeii. ities M~,y 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction and Background ........................................... 7 Economic Development ............................................... 8 Housing ........................................................ 1 3 Capital Improvement ................................................ 1 5 P:\CR~PD\I290R.EV.UPD 5/"]/~7 d, 6 INTRODUCTION The Temecula Redevelopment Agency adopted its Implementation Plan in November 1994. In accordance with Health and Safety Code §33490 a public hearing must be conducted to hear testimony of all interested parties relative to the Redevelopment Plan and the Implementation Plan at least once within the five year term of the Implementation Plan. This Status Report will provide an accounting of all Redevelopment activities in the categories of: Marketing/Promotion, Housing, and Capital Improvements. BACKGROUND The three pertinent documents affecting the redevelopment area were adopted as follows: Redevelopment Plan Old Town Specific Plan AB 1290 Implementation Plan Economic Development Strategic Plan July 1988 February 1994 November 1994 October 1996 All four documents provide general guidance for the development and implementation of Redevelopment Activities. The five year goals of the Redevelopment program as stated in the implementation Plan are as follows: Provide a broad range of public infrastructure improvements to induce private investment in the Project Area. Enhance the public safety and welfare by providing improved community services. Promote the preservation and enhancement of Old Town Temecula. Promote expansion of the industrial and commercial economic and job bases. Preserve, improve and expand housing opportunities for low and moderate income residents. During the course of administering these goals, redevelopment activities have been carried out under the headings of Economic Development, Housing and Capital improvements. The following is a brief summary of accomplishments to date. P:ACEISPD\1290REV.UPD $/'//~ a~ 7 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Business Relocation and Expansion As a result of working with a limited marketing budget funded by the RDA, Temecula has experienced great success over the past two years in attracting businesses to the area as well as assisting local companies with expansions. The marketing efforts are targeted towards small to mid-size companies in specific clean industries. These successful "clean" industries have an established presence within the City and have the greatest potential for growth. Temecula has been a proven profit center for a diverse range of companies in the high-tech manufacturing, communication services, paper and plastics industry and health related manufacturing services. Professional HosDital SuDDly, noted for its production and distribution of medical supplies, completed their expansion of a new 290,000 sq. ft. building in January 1996. This expansion was successful as it was completed in 120 days from the time construction began under the City's Fast Track program. In May, International Rectifier successfully completed its 40,000 sq. ft. expansion, under the City's Fast Track Program, on their high technology semiconductor manufacturing plant. Amscan Inc., a New York City-based national distributor of party supplies, completed its expansion in January 1996 by building an additional 98,918 sq. ft. distribution facility providing a total of 200,000 sq. ft. of operations. The expansion will include 40 new employees. FFF Enterprises is a distributor of blood products and pharmaceutical supplies. Their new facility was completed in Spring 1997 and will encompass 77,582 sq. ft. of office, warehouse and distribution space. Advanced Chemill Systems manufactures equipment for the semi-conductor industry. They relocated their business from Corona, CA, to a 13,000 sq. ft. facility in Temecula. Because of the rapid growth they have experienced, Advanced Chemill Systems has plans to expand their existing facility. Channell Commercial is a manufacturer of precision-molded thermoplastic enclosures used by cable television operators and telephone companies. The company operates in a 160,000 sq. ft. manufacturing and office facility in Temecula and is building a 99,840 sq. ft. manufacturing/distribution center in the City. Plant E(~uil~ment, a manufacturer of emergency 911 data systems, moved into its new 36,053 sq. ft. industrial building in November 1996. P:\CRISPD\I290R.EV.UPD 5/7/97 dc 8 7evo C~olf, a manufacturer of custom-fitted golf clubs, which recently moved to its 235,249 sq. ft. industrial facility, state-of-the-art test center and private driving range in Temecula. The company plans to employee 200 within two and a half years. Magnecomp Cor13., the largest business relocating to Temecula over the last two years, is the world's largest manufacturer and developer of high quality hard disk suspension assemblies. With 2,100 employees worldwide, Magnecomp relocated its Group Operations Headquarters and its 300+ employees to a 100,600 sq. ft. building. An estimated 120 new jobs have been created, and an additional 150-200 are expected within the next 1 ~ years. Relocating from Corona to Temecula at the beginning of 1996 was Western Metal Fab. The company fabricates metal cabinetry for security, computer, fire suppression, and the entertainment industries. Tension Envelope, the largest manufacturer of envelopes in the United States, relocated their Santa Fe Springs operations to Temecula in January 1996. Their West Coast plant serving the Western States and Pacific Rim markets employs 30 people. Marketing/Promotion The City's marketing program was developed to include both business development and tourism. Each division plays an important role which affects the other. The program includes tourism promotion which is used as an incentive to attract business development to the area. Bi-monthly marketing meetings are scheduled with key tourism and business development representatives including the City, EDC, Chamber, OTTMA, Vintner's Association, local special events representative, Inland Empire Tourism Council, Inland Empire Economic Partnership, Film Council and County of Riverside to share individual activities, network and strategies. These meetings have proven to be very effective in coordinating everyone's efforts. Established marketing partnerships with the Inland Empire Tourism Council, Inland Empire Economic Partnership, California Trade & Commerce, Southwest County Alliance and the County of Riverside. Partnership includes co-op ventures in radio advertising, trade show participation, tourism events, fam tours, and sharing business leads. Tourism Outreach Materials are an important part of the marketing campaign that are sent to travel media, travel industry writers and travel industry professionals. Outreach focuses on establishing awareness with the travel industry along with establishing Temecula as a desirable destination for travel. The Tourism Brochure was developed to promote the tourism entities of Temecula. It is used in rack service in San Diego County, distributed at county fairs and festivals outside the area, in tourism press kits and throughout businesses in Old Town. The Visitor Guide represents all the tourism aspects of Temecula as well as local businesses. It is produced by the Chamber of Commerce and funded by the Agency. Press Kits include press releases on all major events and tourism entities. Tourism related literature is also P:\CRL~PD\I~)OREV.UPD $/71~7 dc 9 included (i.e. vintner's brochures, tourism brochure, Old Town Walking Tour Map, Visitors Guide, etc.) Press kits are sent to travel writers, tour operators/planners, and media in the tourism industry. The Tourism Newsletter was first published in April °97 and is targeted to regional, national and international travel writers, planners, and others in the trade industry. It will be published twice a year. The Co-oD Direct Mail Piece/Program is a direct mail piece developed by the Inland Empire Tourism Council which targets travel writers and tour operators in the tourism industry. Six cities in the Inland Empire are featured and given an international theme. Temecula's theme represents France as both areas are known for its beautiful wine country. Extensive media relations are an important outreach to achieve our goals of generating overnight visits and development of attendance for all Temecula events. On-going monthly I;)ublicity on special events, monthly calendar and long-lead calendar of events. On-going resDonse to media inquiries. The City has.developed a customized database of 307 tourism related publications and newspaper/radio contacts as well as over 800 travel writers, tour operators and meeting planners. Sampling of tourism publications include Vacations Magazine, RV magazines, AAA Avenues, Rancho Magazine, Senior World Magazine, Buzz Weekly (Los Angeles Entertainment Magazine) and Southern California Guide. Temecula has been included in two issues of Western Association News, a meeting planners publication. The Pow-Wow Faro Tour was held in Los Angeles in °96 and attracted travel writers, tour operators and planners. Temecula hosted a side trip for a group of travel writers attending the Pow-Wow. California Travel Market, a California only international travel show, attracting 150 top international tour planners and travel writers. Temecula participated in the show as well as hosted a fam tour of travel writers from the travel show. The events took place in April 1997. Targeted advertising opportunities to reach the tourism industry include: advertising in the Guest Informant and San Diegan Publications and have found it to be effective. Both publications are showcased in hotel rooms in San Diego and Orange Counties. The San Diegan is also distributed to major corporations in their human resources department and are sold in retail stores. The Traveler's Ruide Book published by the Guest Informant is a free guide available for tourists visiting San Diego and Orange County. Temecula's tourism attractions and events are included in the book. Temecula is represented in the Inland Eml;)ire Film Counci!'s Production Ruide highlighting filming locations in Temecula as well as general information on our area. A Photography Library has been established of professional photographs which will be used for marketing collateral, Internet, CD Rom, slide shows, advertising and media placements. Marketing Outreach to Re0ublican National Convention targeted the event planners who accompanied delegates to the 1996 GOP Convention in San Diego. The outreach paid off with delegates from various states taking planned side trips to Temecula. P:.\CRISPD'~1290P. EV.UPD 5/'7197 d~ 1 0 Business Development Outreach Materials are designed and produced to assist in the development of awareness and exposure for Temecula among business executives. The New City [ogo Icons were developed to provide a new image to the marketing program. A Rusiness Develol;)ment Kit was developed to supply information on City demographics, relocation, tourism and recreation & leisure activities. It is distributed at trade shows and sent out to prospective businesses. The Fast Track Process and Handbook is an effort to streamline the development review process. The process establishes a partnership between the applicant and City staff. A Fastrack brochure provides a brief overview of the Fast Track Permitting Process. The pamphlet is included in the City's economic development kit. The Business Brochure highlights our business climate and quality of life and is distributed at trade shows, hotels, Chamber of Commerce and included in the business development packets. As part of the business attraction program a Table Tent was designed to complement the brochure. The table tent is displayed on tables of local restaurants, hotel rooms and local business conference rooms. Both received design awards from the inland Empire Ad Club. A unique marketing tool utilized for business and tourism attraction, the CD ROM includes City demographics, tourism entities and special events. Distribution includes: press kits, trade shows, business kits and will be sold in local retail stores. The Real Estate Audience Newsletter targets commercial brokers, developers and lenders informing them of the real estate activity in Temecula. The Testimonial Direct Mail Piece markets testimonials from businesses relocating and expanding in Temecula, i.e. FedEx, International Rectifier, Magnecomp Corp, Amscan, etc. This was sent out as a direct mail piece targeted to CEO's and specific industry-related businesses. A follow-up to the mailing was conducted. The testimonial is distributed at trade shows and included in business kit. The Marketing Committee targets small and mid-size companies within the following industries: High-tech Manufacturing and Communication Services, Paper, Plastics and Health Related Manufacturing Services. These successful "clean" industries have an established presence within the City and have the greatest potential for growth. The Agency and EDC took an active role in supporting the Investor Diamond Venture Forum program in Oct. 1996. The forum, which matches investors with entrepreneurs, was sponsored by Southern California Edison, Ernst and Young, IEEP and UCR. Temecula was the only governmental agency showcasing its materials in the brochure handout which was distributed to an audience of business owners and investors. The City received the Venture Forum's mailing list and has incorporated it into the City's business database. A Retention Committee for Community Businesses has been established to sustain and nurture existing businesses in Temecula. A Reception Committee for Businesses has been established to sponsor welcome receptions for businesses that have relocated to Temecula. P:\CR~PD\I290REV.U~D $/'7/97,~ I I New businesses are provided with pertinent material on the area as well as assistance. A committee member visit the company and welcomes them to the area. Articles on Temecula's growing business climate has appeared in the Los Angeles, San Diego, Orange, and San Gabriel Valley Business Journals, San Diego Union Tribune, Area Development's Location California Magazine and Outlook California Magazine. An article on Temecula's TEAM program appeared in Nation's Cities Weekly. Co-op coverage with the inland Empire and Temecula on two feature articles appearing in the Los Angeles Times. Newsletter Spot Coverage includes Inland Empire Economic Partnership, Team California and Kiplinger Reports. The Local Commercial Broker Marketing Meetings are scheduled with commercial brokers to exchange ideas regarding business attraction. Marketing plan and materials are shared with the brokers. The Real Estate Facilitator Outreach in Orange and Los Angeles Counties was developed to reach out to a select group of commercial brokers operating in Orange and Los Angeles Counties. Temecula's local brokers provided them with information and incentives on bringing users to Temecula. A ~olf/Lodging Industry Rusiness Outreach - targets key business visitors and groups staying at local hotels and golf resorts. A gift basket and business relocation information is provided for the qualified contact for each group. There is further follow-up through direct mail and a personal phone call. Old Town Temecula The City of Temecula and the Old Town Temecula Mainstreet Association joined efforts officially in early 1995 to begin implementation of the Specific Plan for the renovation and revitalization of Old Town Temecula. The association, formerly the Merchants' Association, adopted a Main Street four-point strategy for downtown revitalization. The four goals of the Main Street strategy are: 1) Develop an organization that allows the business district's diverse groups to work together effectively. 2) Advertise and promote the business district. 3) Enhance the visual quality of the project area by using the basic design elements in the existing environment. 4) Diversify and revitalize the business district's economy. The association initially hired a full-time Executive Director and received funding for the program from the City's Redevelopment Agency. The Old Town Entertainment Coml~lex as proposed by The Zev Buffman Group consisted of two cabaret theaters of 900 and 600 seats respectively, one 2,200-seat theater opera house, two saloons, two 50 seat virtual reality theaters, a small production studio for TV, radio and recording and a variety of outdoor entertainment, all within the Old Town Tourist Core as defined by the Old Town Specific Plan. In addition, plans called for a "Wild West Arena Show Tent" with approximately 4,800 seats just west of Old Town. Recently, it was announced that the project would be phased with the initial phase to be built within the Westside Specific Plan area. Staff expects an application for this revised proposal in the near future. P:\CRISPD\I290REV.UPD 5/719'/d= 1 2 Temecula Business Relocation Year 1994 1995 1996 1996 1996 Name Tension Envelope Advanced Chemill Systems (TI) B95-0246 Magnecomp Corp. (TI) B 96-0491, B96-0519 Hydroscape PA96-0008, B97-0063 Sorrento Development PA96-0041, B97-0063 1996 Zevo Golf PA_96-0190, B96-1747 1996 Pacific Developmere (Cal-Paloma-del Sol) PA96-0157 1996 California Companies PA96-0018 1996 1996 Comraaors Cold Planing(Industfial Bldg.) PA96-0046, B96-1458 Spec. Industrial Bldg. Sq. Ft. 79,000 13,000 100,600 10,000 19,000 235,249 99,486 3,000 9,712 17,219 Valuation 1,533,000 12,000 25,000 256,902 475,177 7,017,530 3,413,364 *parcel map 81,210 *parcel map 478,262 413,177 1996 1996 SpecialtyMetals PA96-0266, B96-2165 Four-Sher Spec. Bldg. PA96-0232, B96-2116 *denotes estimated future valuation 45,000 92,182 1,336,032 2,331,282 R:~PLANNING~ON.DOC 5/5/97 klb Temecula Business Expansion Year Name Sq. Ft. Valuation 1994 International Rectifier 54,600 16,200,000 1994 Charmell Commercial 49,400 1,300,000 1995 Professional Hospital Supply 290,000 8,200,000 1995 Amscan, Inc. 108,000 3,800,000 1995 Opti-Forms 24,450 750,000 1996 Plant Equipment 36,053 1,200,000 1996 FFF Emerprise 77,582 2,400,000 1996 Charmell Commercial 99,840 2,500,000 1996 Napa Auto Parts 12,500 487,625 1997 International Rectifier 30,000 30,000,000 R:XPLANNING~,ARON.DOC 5/5197 idb HOUSING The Redevelopment Agency of Temecula purchased Rancho West ADartments, a 150-unit complex in Old Town and conveyed the property to Coachella Valley Housing Coalition who own and will operate the project in accordance with the terms of a regulatory agreement with the Redevelopment Agency which restricts rents to affordable levels and requires proper maintenance standards be met. The improvements for the Rancho West project helps the RDA meet its goal to preserve, improve, and expand housing opportunities for low and moderate income residents. The Redevelopment Agency will begin designing and developing The North P~jol Redevelopment Project. Last year the Agency purchased the Sherwood and Pujol Apartment Complexes totaling 38 units, and four single family homes, now demolished, along the west side of North Pujol. The project will consist of rehabilitation of the 38 apartment units and their grounds, and developing 10-12 new affordable units. To date, the Agency has spent nearly $1.3 Million Dollars acquiring these properties. A preliminary estimate of the cost for rehabilitation and new construction has been proposed at $875,000. The Temecula ONE program, which stands for Operation Neighborhood Enrichment, was developed in February, 1996 to provide assistance, protection and support to families living in low-income areas of the City. Four assigned communities, within Temecula, receive the special efforts of the Temecula ONE Team. The Temecula ONE team is comprised of the Problem-Oriented Policing (POP) Team, Housing Division, City Manager's Office, and representatives from all City departments. The School District and several other community agencies are also involved in this city-wide effort. It was important to the team to gain an understanding of what the citizens believed the areas of concern were in their neighborhood. To accomplish this, a professional public relations consultant was retained to conduct a needs assessment survey. The results of this survey are the foundation of what is now the Temecula ONE Program. Based on the results of this survey, program goals and objectives were defined. By listening to the community, Temecula ONE created solutions tailored to specific neighborhood concerns. The POP Team works with the apartment manager's and homeowner's associations to identify and eliminate problem tenants, vandalism, and graffiti. The Housing Division provides residential rehabilitation loans. Code Enforcement abates abandoned vehicles. The Public Works Division has provided additional street lighting through Southern California Edison improving safety and street conditions. In addition to physical improvements, Temecula ONE is also addressing the social and human service needs of the residents. Through our Community Services Department, programs targeted to the needs of the local residents are being offered at the neighborhood community center. The neighborhood community center now offers a variety of programs such as ESL, AA, quilting classes, weekend sports for children of all ages and job and health fairs for local residents. In addition, Temecula ONE sponsors a free Christmas Dinner, a Fourth of July barbeque and Cinco de Mayo celebration for community residents. P:~,CR~PD~,I~OR~V.UPD 5/7/97 d= 13 Because community involvement is a major goal, on-going neighborhood meetings are held in each community. The POP Team supports a newly formed Apartment Manager's Association which meets monthly. These meetings provide forums for continual feedback from the residents and to provide them an opportunity to develop a sense of neighborhood and become active in their own problem solving. These community meetings have been structured to empower the designated neighborhood residents. This collaborative approach to neighborhood revitalization and stabilization has already rewarded many residents with an improved quality of life. But most importantly, Temecula ONE has given community citizens, the opportunity to come forward with issues and become an integral part of the solution process. The First Time Homebuyers Program has been an extremely successful program. In only seven months the program will have assisted 14 families to purchase homes. The program offers moderate income families down payment assistance through down payment assistance. The participants must be first time home buyers and purchase a home valued at $120,000 or less. For homes located within an assigned community, there is no payment or interest for the first five years, and interest only payments for years 6 through 20. The loan is forgiven after 20 years. For homes outside the assigned communities, there is no payment or interest for the first five years and the loan is fully amortized over years 6 through 20. Interest is based on the Prime Rate at the time the loan documents are signed (currently at 8.5%). In either case the loan is due and payable at such time the home is sold or refinanced. The Residential ImDrovement Program has four components. The Multi-Family Rehabilitation Program is targeted toward the owners of apartment units. The program provides up to $3,000 per unit to rehabilitate the units. The Rancho Creek Apartments located on Felix Valdez in Old Town has used the program to repaint the buildings, install a tot lot, install fencing, re-landscape the grounds a upgrade the interiors to uniform housing code standards. up to $90,000 to repaint, landscape, and provide a tot lot. In exchange, the apartments will be made available at affordable rent levels for a 30 year period. The Senior Housing ReDair and Single Family ReDair Rrants assist income qualifying households to make improvements that bring substandard housing conditions into compliance with Uniform Building Code requirements. The Paint and Fence ReDair Program loan income qualifying households up to $5,000 to make exterior cosmetic improvements. Eligible improvements include roofing, painting and fencing. The loan accrues simple interest for a five year period. Principal and interest is due and payable if the property is sold or refinanced. The loan is forgiven after five years. P:~,CRISPD\I290REV.UPD 5/719'/dc 1 4 Z ["' :::::::::::::::::::::: ~::.:...:.:.:~i~:...~ ~. 'i CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Old Town Specific Plan The Old Town Specific Plan contains 29 implementation measures which are capital Improvements. To date, eighteen (18) or sixty-two percent (62%) of the projects are either completed or underway. The biggest and most significant project is The Old Town Streetscape Imnrovement Project. This major project incorporates nine implementation measures found in the Specific Plan. The Streetscape Project will construct new improvements the length of Front Street between Sixth and First Streets, and Main Street from the Creek to Mercedes. Improvements will include rolled curb and wooden boardwalk, streetlights, street signs, benches, trash barrels and other street furniture. Gateway landscaping along the west side of Front Street south of Rancho California Road and storm drainage improvements are also included. The arched gateway signs and Front/Main street intersection improvements are part of the Gateway improvements. The current Capital Improvement Program includes $3,000,000 for the design and construction of the Streetscape Project. Webb and Associates has been selected and has commenced work to develop the construction drawings for this project. The current schedule estimates the drawings will be completed around October 1997. It is projected to take about 90 days to go through the public bid process and award a construction contract. It is likely that construction will occur on a block by block basis, starting late February, 1998. The 6th Street Parking Project, currently under construction, includes public restrooms and lockers, bus parking and 80 parking stalls. This project includes the Boardwalk and other improvements that will be constructed as part of the Old Town Streetscape project. The facility is set to open in May, 1997. To date, the Agency has spent $427,000 on these improvements out of a total budget of $807,505. This project will tie into the proposed Transportation Center scheduled for completion in Summer 1997. The Facade Improvement and Non-Conforming Sign Removal Programs assist property owners and business owners to make improvements to their buildings and signs in conformance with the specific Plan's Old West design theme. A total of $275,000 is budgeted in the Capital Improvement Program for FY 96-97 through FY 98-99. The Facade Program includes a loan component and Rebate component. The loan has a maximum 5 year repayment period, can range from $10,000 to $50,000, and has a rate of Prime (at time of Council action, currently at 8.5%). The Rebate Component provides a maximum rebate of $10,000 based on a 50% rebate on a $20,000 improvement. The Non-Conforming Sign Removal program includes incentives to provide free sign removal and free sign design to participants who remove non-conforming signs. The previous $500 and $1,000 cash incentive to remove non-conforming signs expired in December 1996. The Undergrounding Feasibility Study is determining the opportunities, alternatives and costs associated with undergrounding the overhead utilities in Old Town. The study is costing $50,000. P:\CRISPD\I290R. EV.UImD 5/'//97 dc 15 The Santa Barbara Electric Transoortation Institute is conducting a feasibility study to determine the ability of using an electric bus between Old Town and the wineries and between Old Town and the casino. The Redevelopment Agency is in partnership with Southern California Edison with both parties allocating $2,500 for the study. The 6th Street Bridge Feasibility Study will determine the type of bridge design, right-of-way requirements, and other associated construction/design costs to construct a bridge across Murrieta Creek at Sixth Street. Upcoming projects in Old Town include The Old Town Heritage Park and two additional Parking Lots and Restroom Facilities. These projects will be considered in the FY 97-96 Capital improvement Program. Sam Hicks Monument Park Improvement Project, a 2 ½ acre park, received improvements including a concession/restroom facility, gazebo, rose garden, renovated play area, lighting, landscaping and improvements to the existing monument coupled with a beautiful plaza area, meandering walkways and picnic facilities. The new building for The Temecula Valley Museum, located behind the park, is under construction as well as St. Catherine's Church, which will operate as a wedding chapel and serve as a community meeting place. The Old Town Senior Center was completed in September 1994. The 6,000 square foot facility provides a wide variety of services and activities for senior citizens. The Agency contributed over $1 million dollars to renovate a vacated building. Infrastructure Temecula continues its commitment toward planning for growth and for providing the infrastructure necessary for that growth. Many capital improvements were initiated in 1996 including: The Winchester Bridge Widening Project provides for the widening of the Winchester Road Bridge over the I-15 Freeway, the widening of the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge and the construction of a new northbound loop on ramp. Construction is underway. The bridge will be open for traffic by June 1997 and fully completed in September 1997. To date, $3,394,075 has been spent out of a total budget of $4,562,752 for design and construction, of which $3,900,000 will come from the RDA. The Rancho California Road Interchange Improvements will construct a northbound loop on- ramp widen the freeway over crossing. The construction drawings are 90% completed. Construction should start in Fall 1997 and be completed in Spring 1999. To date, $650,000 has been spent out of a total budget of $5,730,000 for design and construction of which $258,870 will come from the RDA. The Old Town First Street Bridge and Roadway Realignment Project will realign the Front and First/Santiago Street intersection and build a new bridge over Murrieta Creek. The design of the improvements is 95% completed. Construction should begin in late 1997. The Agency has spent $1,030,737 to date out of a total budget of $4,175,000. The Old Town Water and Sewer lines are included in the City's Five Year Capital Improvement Program. Funding for later years have been set at $537,000 and $574,200 respectively. P:~.CRISPD~,1290R.EV.UPD 5/7/97 dc 16 ~ ~ o = ITEM 2 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council, Redevelopment Agency, Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority and Old Town Westside Improvement Authority Members Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager May 13, 1997 Old Town Temecula Entertainment Project Termination of Owner Participation Agreement and Fluor Daniel Construction Management Agreement, and Dissolution of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 RECOMMENDATION: 1) It is recommended that the following Resolutions be adopted: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 97- "A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CiTY OF TEMECULA TERMINATING THAT CERTAIN 'OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND T.Z.B.G., INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION,' DATED AUGUST 31, 1995, AS AMENDED MARCH 26, 1996.' RESOLUTION NO. FA 97- "A RESOLUTION OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY TERMINATING THAT CERTAIN 'CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISION AGREEMENT,' DATED NOVEMBER 26, 1996.' 2) It is recommended that the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District read by Title Only, waive further reading and introduce the Ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. FA 97- AN ORDINANCE OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY DISSOLVING THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. I {OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS). BACKGROUND: Owner Participation Agreement On August 31, 1995, the Redevelopment Agency entered into an 'Owner Participation Agreement by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and T.Z.B.G., Inc., a California Corporation," which agreement was amended by the parties on March 26, 1996 by the 'Amendment to Owner Participation Agreement (OPA)." T.Z.B.G., Inc., assigned its interest in the OPA to Temecula Valley Entertainment, Inc. (Participant) with the consent of the Redevelopment Agency. The OPA provides in Sections 4.1 and 4.4 that the Participant would acquire land, design and construct certain Entertainment Facilities described in the OPA (the 'Project") and would consent to and participate in the formation of a Community Facilities District on its property to finance and construct certain public improvements for the Old Town Specific Plan Area also described in the OPA. The OPA further provides in Section 4.2 that the Agency would contribute to the Project in consideration of the Participant's construction of the public improvements. At the time of the approval of the OPA, the Participant held options to purchase certain properties in the Old Town Specific Plan Area and the Westside Specific Plan Area for the construction of the Project. Subsequent to the adoption of the OPA, the City of Temecula and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula formed the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority. The Authority then formed the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Specific Plan Area Public Improvements) ('CFD"). The CFD has completed all actions necessary, including an election, for issuance of bonds to finance land acquisition, design and construction of the public improvements and were ready to issue bonds upon confirmation of the Participant's financing of the Project and acquisition of the properties in the Old Town Specific Plan Area required for the Project. On February 28, 1997 Participant's options to purchase approximately 5 acres of land in the Old Town Specific Plan Area which would have been used for the Project expired without the properties being acquired. On April 21, 1997 the Participant elected not to acquire the properties in the Westside Specific Plan Area which would have been included in the CFD and consequently authorization to issue bonds for the public improvements and to construct the public improvements to be financed by the CFD have expired. To date, the Participant has not been able to secure financing for the Project. On March 3, 1997, the Participant announced that it would consolidate the Project by building a sports arena and theater complex in the Westside Specific Plan Area and defer development in the Old Town Specific Plan Area, including construction of public improvements. Given that the Participant's proposed development of an arena and theater in the Westside Specific Plan area is not within a Redevelopment Project Area, an Owner Participation Agreement will not be required for the Project; rather, the City will respond to any application for development which may be submitted by Temecula Valley Entertainment, inc. by means of the land use entitlement procedures now in place within the City which include Planning Commission and City Council review. Section 6.8 of the OPA provides that the Participant and the Agency shall be relieved of all further rights and obligations under the OPA (except for certain obligations surviving termination) unless on or before August 31, 1996 (1) the Participant has obtained financing for the Project upon terms and conditions reasonably satisfactory to Participant and (2) Participant has obtained the land necessary for the development. Since these conditions have not been met, it is recommended that the OPA be terminated except for (1) the provisions of Section 4.2.G requiring the Agency to purchase from the Participant the usable design work for the public improvements, and (2) the indemnification provisions of the OPA in Sections 2.4 and 4.5. Construction Management and Supervision Agreement On November 26, 1996, the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority, for itself and on behalf of its Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Specific Plan Area Public Improvements) and Fluor Daniel, Inc. entered into that certain 'Construction Management and Supervision Agreement" (hereafter 'Agreement"). The Agreement provides that Fluor Daniel would serve as the construction manager for the construction and installation of the public improvements with the proceeds of the bonds to be issued by the CFD, and that Fluor Daniel would guarantee the construction and installation of the public improvements at a cost not to exceed $17,288,202.00, subject to the terms of the Agreement. Fluor Daniel has not undertaken any work pursuant to this Agreement. Due to the circumstances described previously with respect to termination of the OPA, it is recommended that 'Construction Management and Supervision Agreement" by and among the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority for itself and on behalf of its Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Specific Plan Area Public Improvements) and Fluor Daniel, Inc., dated November 26, 1996 be terminated. Community Facilities District Financing The Old Town /Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority was created pursuant to a joint exercise of powers agreement between the City and the Redevelopment Agency to assist in the financing of public improvements in the Old Town area of the City and of the Western Bypass. Due to circumstances beyond the control of the Authority, no public financing is contemplated at this time to finance any such improvements. In order to remove any cloud on the title to any property within the boundaries of the Authority's previously established CFD No. 1. The CFD must be dissolved. A first reading of the ordinance dissolving the CFD has been recommended for this meeting to be followed by the adoption of the ordinance at the meeting of May 27. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact as a result of the recommended actions. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. RDA 97- Resolution No. FA 97- Ordinance No. FA 97- Termination of Owner Participation Agreement RESOLUTION NO. RDA 97- A RESOLUTION OF ~ I~K'~EVELO~ AGENCY OF ~ CITY OF TEMECUI~ TERMINATING THAT CERTAIN "OWNER PARTICIPATION AGR .l~'~Ik'~]T BY AND BETWEEN ~ I~I~EVELOPMENT AGENCY OF ~ CITY OF TEMEC'UI~ AND T.Z.B.G., INC., A CAI.I~ORNIA CORPORATION," DATED AUGUSer 31, 1995, AS AMENDk'~ MARCH 26, 1996 THE BOARD OF DIREC'rORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency does hereby find, determine and declare that: (a) The Agency is currently implementing the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1-1988, originally approved by the Board of Supervisors on July 12, 1988 prior to the incorporation of the City and subsequently approved and transferred to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula on April 9, 1991 and amended on December 20, 1994 (the "Plan"). (b) As part of that implementation, the Agency entered into that certain "Owner Participation Agreement by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and T.Z.B.G., Inc., a California Corporation" on August 31, 1995, which agreement was amended by the parties on March 26, 1996 by that certain "Amendment to Owner Participation Agreemere." (The Owner Participation Agreement, as amended, shall be referred to as the "OPA. ") The original OPA was recorded on September 25, 1996 as Document No. 316992 in the Official Records of the County of Riverside and the Amendment to the OPA was recorded on May 23, 1996 as Document No. 191150 in the Official Records of the County of Riverside. (c) T.Z.B.G, Inc., assigned its interests in the OPA to Temecula Valley Entertainment, Inc., with the consent of the Agency. No other assignments of the OPA have been made. (d) The OPA provides in Sections 4.1 and 4.4 that the Participant would acquire land, design and constoa t certain Entertainment Facilities as described in Section 2.1 of the OPA (the "Project") and would also consent to and participate in the formation of a community facilities district on its property to finance and construct certain public improvements for the Old Town Area also described in Section 2.1 of the OPA (the "Public Improvements"). The OPA further provides in Section 4.2 that the Agency would contribute to the project in consideration of the Participant's construction of the Public Improvements. (e) The OPA provides in Section 1.3 that the Site of the Entertainment Facilities will be those properties in the "Tourist Core Retail" area of the Old Town Specific Plan and the "Westside Area" of the Westside Specific Plan which are acquired by the Participant. At the time of approval of the OPA, the Participant had options to purchase certain properties in the Old Town Area and the Westside Area for the construction of the Entertainment Facilities. (0 The City of Temecula and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula formed the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority. The Authority formed the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Specific Plan Area Public Improvements) CCFD"). The CFD has completed all actions necessary to issue bonds, including an election, for issuance of bonds to finance the land acquisition, design and construction of the Public Improvements and the bonds were ready to issue upon the confirmation of the Participant's financing of the Entertainment Facilities and acquisition of the properties for the Entertainment Facilities in the Old Town Area. (g) Participant extensively marketed the Project to a number of financial institutions and has not secured financing for all of the Entertainment Facilities. (h) On March 3, 1997, the Participant announced that it would consolidate the project by building a sports arena and theater complex on the Westside Specific Plan Area and defer development in the Old Town Area, including the construction of the Public Improvements. (I) On February 28, 1997 Participant's options to purchase approximately five acres of land in the Old Town Area for the Entertainment Facilities expired without the properties being acquired. O) On April 21, 1997, the Participant elected not to acquire the properties in the Westside Area and, consequently, the authorizations for the bonds to finance the Public Improvements, the authorizations to construct the Public Improvements, and the CFD have expired. (k) The Participant's proposed development of the arena and theater in the Westside Area is not within the Project Area. (1) Section 6.8 of the OPA provides that the Participant and the Agency shall be relieved of all further rights and obligations under the OPA (except for certain obligations surviving termination) unless on or before August 31, 1996 (1) the Participant has obtained financing for the Entertainment Facilities upon terms and conditions reasonably satisfactory to Participant and (2) Participant has obtained the parcels for the Site, among others. Section 2. The Board of Directors hereby terminates that certain ~Owner Participation Agreement by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and T.Z.B.G., Inc., a California Corporation' on August 31, 1995, as amended on March 26, 1996 by that certain 'Amendment to Owner Participation Agreement' exempt for (1) the pmvisiona of Section 4.2.G. requiting the Agency to purchase from the Participant the usable design work for the Public Imprevertants, and (2) the indemnification provisions of the Agreement in Sections 2.4 and 4.5, and (3) the provisions of the OPA providing remedies for breach of the OPA, which specific obligations only shall survive termination of the parties rights and obligations under the OPA as described herein and shall remain in full force and effect until said obligations have been complet~l, and approves that certain amendment to the OPA entitled "Agreement to Terminate Owner Participation Agreement (Second Amendment)" in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. The Board of Directors hereby withdraws its consent to all assignments of the OPA. Section 3. The Secretary shall certify the adoption of this Resolution and shall send a certified copy of the resolution to the Participant, at the address set forth in the OPA. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula on May 13, 1997. ATTEST: Steven Ford Chairperson JUNE S. GREEK Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA $$ I, June S. Greek, Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the Resolution No. 97- was duly and regularly adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on May 13, 1997, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BOARDMEMBERS: NOES: BOARDMEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: BOARDMEMBERS: Approved as to Form: JUNE S. GREEK Secretary Peter M. Thorson General Counsel RESOLUTION NO. FA 97- A RESOLUTION OF ~ OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACTT.rrIF. S DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY TERMINATING THAT CERTAIN *'CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISION AGR -~NT," DATED NOVEMBER 26, 1996 ~ BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ~ OLD TOWN/'vVESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACH.rl'IES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLTOWS: Section 1. The Board of Directors does hereby find, determine and declare that: (a) The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula CAgency") entered into that certain "Owner Participation Agreement by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and T.Z.B.G., Inc., a California Corporation" on August 31, 1995, which agreement was amended by the parties on March 26, 1996 by that certain "Amendmere to Owner Participation Agreement." (The Owner Participation Agreement, as amended, shall be referred to as the "OPA;" T.B.Z.G., Inc. and its successors and assigns shall be referred to as "Participant. ") (b) T.Z.B.G, Inc., assigned its interests in the OPA to Temecula Valley Entertainment, Inc., with the consent of the Agency. (c) The OPA provides in Sections 4.1 and 4.4 that the Participant would acquire land, design and construct certain Entertainment Facilities as described in Section 2.1 of the OPA (the "Project") and would also consent to and participate in the formation of a community facilities district on its property to finance and construct certain public improvements for the Old Town Specific Plan Area also described in Section 2.1 of the OPA (the "Public Improvements"). The OPA further provides in Section 4.2 that the Agency would contribute to the project in consideration of the Participant's construction of the Public Improvements. (d) The OPA provides in Section 1.3 that the Site of the Entertainment Facilities will be those properties in the "Tourist Core Retail" area of the Old Town Specific Plan and the "Westside Area" of the Westside Specific Plan which are acquired by the Participant. At the time of approval of the OPA, the Participant had options to purchase certain properties in the Old Town Area and the Westside Area for the construction of the Entertainment Facilities. (e) The City of Temecula and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula formed the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority. The Authority formed the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) CCFD"). The CFD has completed all actions necessary to issue bonds, including an election, for issuance of bonds to finance the land acquisition, design and construction of the Public Improvements and the bonds were ready to issue upon the confirmation of the Participant's financing of the Entertainment Facilities and acquisition of the properties for the Entertainment Facilities in the Old Town Area. (f) On November 26, 1996 the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing AuthoriF, for itself and on behalf of its Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) and Fluor Daniel, Inc. entered into that certain "Construction Management and Supervision Agreement' (hereafter 'Agreement"). The Agreement provides that Fluor Daniel would serve as the consm~ction manager for the construction and installation of the Public Improvements with the proceeds of the bonds to be issued by the CFD, and that Fluor Daniel would guaranty the construction and installation of the Public Improvements at a cost not to exceed $17,288,202.00, subject to the terms of the Agreement. Fluor Daniel has not undertaken any work pursuant to this Agreement. (g) Participant extensively marketed the Project to a number of financial institutions and has not secured financing for all of the Entertainment Facilities. (h) On March 3, 1997, the Participant announced that it would consolidate the project by building a sports arena and theater complex on the Westside Specific Plan Area and defer development in the Old Town Specific Plan Area, including the construction of the Public Improvements. (I) On February 28, 1997 Participant's options to purchase approximately five acres of land in the Old Town Area for the Entertainment Facilities expired without the properties being acquired. 0) On April 21, 1997, the Participant elected not to acquire the properties in the Westside Area and, consequenfiy, the authofi?mions for the bonds to finance the Public Improvements, the authofi~tions to constoa t the Public Improvements, and the CFD have expired. Section 2. The Board of Directors hereby terminates that certain 'Construction Management and Supervision Agreement' by and among Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority, for itself and on behalf of its Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) and Fluor Daniel, Inc., dated November 26, 1996. Section 3. The Secretary shall certify the adoption of this Resolution and shall send a certified copy of the resolution to Fluor Daniel, Inc., at the address set forth in the Agreement. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority on May 13, 1997. Karel F. Lindemans Chairperson ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, Secretary of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority, do hereby certify that the Resolution No. 97- was duly and regularly adopted by the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority at a regular meeting thereof, held on May 13, 1997, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BOARDMEMBERS: NOES: BOARDMEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: BOARDMEMBERS: Approved as to Form: JUNE S. GREEK Secretary Peter M. Thorson General Counsel ORDINANCE NO. FA 97- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACH,ITIF_,S DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY DISSOLVING THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACHJTIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. I (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVF_,M~NTS) WHEREAS, on April 23, 1997, the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Crhe "Authority") adopted Resolution No. FA 96-04 forming the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the "District"), and on July 9, 1996, the Authority adopted Resolution No. FA 96-10 annexing territory to the District; and WI~ZRF_,AS, the District was created at the request of certain landowners and developers to finance public improvements in the Old Town area of the City of Temecula and a portion of the Costs of the Western Bypass, and, based upon a failure to transfer title to most of the land in the District to the developer, it now appears that the financing will not occur as previously anticipated; and WHEREAS, in order to remove any cloud or title to the land in the District, the Authority now desires to dissolve the District as provided herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows: 1. The Board of Directors of the Authority, as the legislative body for the District, hereby determines that: (a) the District is not obligated to pay any outstanding debt; and (b) the District has no authorization to levy any special tax. 2. The District and all associated liens, if any, are hereby dissolved. 3. The Secretary of the Authority is hereby authorized and directed to record an addendum to the Notice of Special Tax Lien for the District (including the area annexed thereto by Annexation No. 1) in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A and otherwise as required by Section 3114.5 of the California Streets and Highways Code, which shall contain the statements required by Section 53338.5 of the California Government Code. 4. The Chairperson shall sign this Ordinance and the Secretary shall cause the same to be published and circulated in the area of the District. Ords.fa\97--001 I 5. This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days from the date of final passage. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOlYrEl~, by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of May, 1997. Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/ Authority Secretary [SEAL] Ords.fa\97-001 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OR RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance No. FA 97- was duly introduced at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority on the 13th day of May, 1997, and was duly adopted at a regular meeting of said Board of Directors on the 27th of May, 1997, by the following roll call vote: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMB~: BOARD lVIEMBERS: ABSTAINED: BOARD MEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk Authority Secretary Only.f,\97-001 3 EXHIBIT A RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND AFTER RECORDATION RETURN TO: Secretary Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority c/o City Clerk, City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 ADDENDUM TO NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) AND OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRiCT FINANCING AUTHORiTY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) ANNEXATION NO. I Pursuant to the requirements of Section 3117.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of California and the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, Section 53311, et. seq., of the California Government Code (the "Act"), the undersigned Secretary of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority (the "Authority"), County of Riverside, State of California, hereby gives notice that on May 27th, 1997, the legislative body for the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the "District") adopted an ordinance (the "Ordinance") making the determinations described in Section 53338.5 of the Act. Pursuant to the Ordinance, the District and all associated liens, if any, have been dissolved. This Addendum modifies that certain Notice of Special Tax Lien heretofore recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside, State of California on May 17, 1996 at the hour of 8:00 o'clock a.m. as Document No. 182619 and that certain Amended Notice of Special Tax Lien for Annexation No. 1 heretofore recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside, State of California on August 14, 1996 at the hour of 8:00 o'clock a.m. as Document No. 306482. The assessor's tax parcel numbers of all parcels or any portion thereof which were included in the District are as shown in Exhibit C to the aforementioned Notice of Special Tax Lien and in Exhibit A to the aforementioned Amended Notice of Special Tax Lien. For further information concerning the dissolution of the District, interested persons should contact the Treasurer of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590, telephone number (909) 694-6444. Dated: , 1997 By: Secretary, Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority A-1 NAY-e6-~? le:S3 F~OH,CIT¥ OF T£H£CU~A ID,9eBE941999 PAC£ 2/9 11087-00010 =tt 1480424 RECORDED AT RE~U'ES'T Jtme C,~t, ~ Rcdcvdopm~at A~acy of th~ City of 432~ ~ ~ ~e Sec~ioas 6103 an~ 2738~ &G~ _. __lrl~t~ ~O ~TE OWlq]~ I'ARTICIPATION AGRm~fl~f (SF. CO~ ~l~a~ 1. ~ Second Amendnmnt is made with respect w the following fa~ and for the following Im.,~ses, eac~ of which is ~eknowledged ~s true ~md correct by the parties: a. The Ageaey and Particitmnt ramred into an Owner Agreemint on August 31, 1995 to provide for redevelopment of the Site by cogstru~ a the Eat~rminment ]~acililies and ~]~t_~_ Public Improvements ('Ozigiaal OPA'); b. On March 26, 1996 the Agency and Parficipam entered into that ce~Jn agreement enftled "Am~'ndment to OPA' modif3fins the Original OPA Ammdmmt'); c. The (kiginal OPA was recoo~___ on Scpmmbcr 25, 1996 as Docummt No. 316992 in the Offmial Records of the County of Riverside and the Fizst Amendment was recorded on May 23, 1996 as Document No. 191150 in the Official d. The Original OPA and the First Amendment shall collectively be x-ci'ca~d to a~ the "OPA;' HAY-e6-9? le,S3 FROH,CITY OF TEHECULA ID,98969q]999 PAGE 3/9 DRAFT: MARCH 31, 1997 FOR DI~-'USSION PURPOSES ONLY e. Toe Site, as defined in the Original OPA and the Fire Amendmint, is descn'lx:d o~ Exifibit A., ,m~-hed hereto and hu:o. po~,aed here/u as ~ough sa forth/n parking and muri~ commercial portions of the Project o~ to the We~z/de Specific Plan Area, which is located outside of the Project Arm; and g. Pa~c/l~ut held oix/on~ to ~ portions of tt~ Site for constructions of ~c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Old To~ ~ w~ ~fi~s ~ h. A~~y, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~e ~~s of ~e ~ ~ ~~t ~ ~e OPA, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~d~ ~ ~ ~~, m ~ ~ ~ A~ ~ ~~ i~ Old T~ ~bHc ~~ ~m ~ ~ ~ow ~t ~ ~ ~ ~, ~, ~ p~ ~1, ~~, ~ ~ w~ ~~ ~ of ~e ~j~ ~ w ~= W~ S~~~ ~ hl~ o~ of~ ~j~~ a. Participant has duly authorized the execution of this Second Amendment and that the petm~ executing it on behalf of Pax~ipant are duly authofir~ to do so; b. Pani~t has not a_~x-igned, conveyed or otherwise txan~ the OPA, or any portion thereof, to any person as of the date ~hi.~ Second Amended is executed; 3. The parties hcacto mutually agrm to terminate their respective rights and obligations pursuant to the OPA except for the obligations arising by virtue of (1) Section 4.2,G., providing for the Agesroy's purchase of plans and specifications for the design of the Old Town Public Improvements and the Western Bypass at the time of termination, (2) Section 2.4.A., B., and 4.5, provi~ for indemnification of the parties, and (3) the inovisions of the OPA providing remedies for breach of the OPA, which specific obligations only shall survive m'minat/on of the parties rights aad obligations under the OPA as deem'bed herin and shall r~nair, in full force and effect until said obligations have been completed. /ill IIII -2- DRAi;T:. MARCH 31, 1997 FOR DISCUSSION lq~t~OSE$ ONLY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TRF. CITY OF TEI~.~-~TLA, a public body, corporate and politic BY: .)'unc S. Greek Peter M. Thorson ~ ENTERT~ VAI.X.lr:y, INC., a California Corporation -3- DRAI~: MARCi~ 31, 1997 I~OR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY -4- FROM,CITY OF T£M£CULA ID,909G941999 PACE 6/9 DRAFt: MARCH 31, ~ FOR DISCUSSION PI3RPOSES ONLY AI2L,-~S]3 A~OWI.I;r~G~ [3 [] ~y known to me -OR- pxoved to me on the basis of ~ ~-wid=ce to be the person(s) whosc name(s) is/ax~ subscxib~ t~ the ~ ism~]msmt and acknowledged to me that halshe/they executed time ~,ne in his/hex/thedr antl~ized c~p~ty(i~s), lmcl t~t by hi__-/h~/their sig~re(s) on the ~ the lnxson(s), or the -,ti;ty upon behalf of which the pexs~n(s) acted, e~ec-u~ed the instrument. Wim~ss my hand aud offu:ial seal SIGNATURE OF NOTARY [] [] n'~Urv-iUU~a.4S) O~CiZR(S) CXn'L~Sl): CAPACITY CLAIM17D BY SIGNER [ ] ?ARTN]ZR(S) [ ] AT1X)RNE~-IN-FACT [ ] ~us'r~y.4s) [ ] CHAIRPI~SON/MAYOR SIGNERISR.IH:PRESE.NTING: -5- MA¥-8~-97 1~,64 F~0H,CITY OF T£H£CULA ID,B896941~g9 PAG~ ?/~ DRAFT: MAR :~ 31, 1997 FOR DISCUSSION FURPOSES ONLY ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEIX~MENT S~a~ of C.~li~ ) County of 1Uvcrsidc ) [3 [] personally known to me -OR- ~ to mc o~ the b~_,i, of sa~ cvidc~c to be ~ person(s) whose ~mels) executed the same in kds/her/fl~.edr authorized cal~tyCleS), and that by ~mm~(s) on ~be immun~t ~ lxr, o.(s). or ~be em~y .{x~ {giudf of wh~c~ person(s) acted, executed the Wireess my hand aad official seal. SIGNATURE OF NOTARY [] [] m-nn, mu.~I4s) on~c~(s) crrrL~sB: CAPACITY BY SIGN't~ [ ] PA~(S) [ ] ATTO~-IN-FACT [ ] ~'I~USlT. E(S) [ ] CHAIRPI/RSON/MAYOR SIGNER IS REP~G: -6- NA¥-86-B? 18,SS FRON,CIT¥ OF T£H£CULA ID,9896941999 PACE 8/9 DRAFIX: MARCH 31, 1997 FOR D1SC~b~ON PURPOSES ONLY ALL-~SE AC3~gOW~EZ:)(~M]EI~r Sta~ of Califom~ ) County of Rivcr~e ) · 1997, before me, [1 £J person~y known to me -OR- laoved to me on the tinsis of satisf-aclm'y evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) ~/A[~ 5~bsczib~ ID fi~ within ill.gtrLilRe~t al~ ag. ka.owl~ig, lgl to mo tha~ he/she/they ex~cuu~! the ~me in his/her/their autlx~ed capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the insmunent the txn'son(s), or the entity upon beef of which the person(s) acted, execuled the instrument. Witness my hand and offini;~ seal. SIGNATURE OF NOTARY [] o~,~zC~..a(S) (TITLE[S]): CAPACITY ~ BY SIGNER I ] PArTNER(S) [ ] ATTOKNEY-IN-FACT [ ] TRUSTEF.~S) [] OTmm: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: - 7 - DRAFt: MARCi~ 31, 1997 FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY -8- TEMECULA CO'MMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT HELD APRIL 22, 1997 A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:36 P.M. at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. President Jeffrey E. Stone presiding. ROLL CALL PRESENT: ABSENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone 0 DIRECTORS: None Also present were General Manager Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and City Clerk/District Secretary June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSFNT CA! ENDAR It was moved by Director Lindemans, seconded by Director Roberts, to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-3. 2 AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: Minutes Birdsall, Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone None None 1.1 Approve the minutes of April 8, 1997. Release of Warranty Bonds for Butterfield Stage Park - Kaufman and Broad of San r3iego. Inc. (Located at De Portola Road and Butterfield Stage Road) 2.1 Authorize the release of the Warranty Bond for the construction of Butterfield Stage Park - Kaufman and Broad of San Diego, Inc.; 2.2 Direct the Secretary/City Clerk to notify the Developer and the Surety. r:\minutea.csd\O42297 -1- 3 Amendment No. I to Winchester Creek Park Ac~jjisition Agreement 3.1 Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Winchester Creek Park Acquisition Agreement; 3.2 Authorize staff to deposit $27,000 into the escrow to cover the property taxes as provided in the Amendment to the Acquisition Agreement. DISTRICT BUSINESS 4 TCSD ProDosed Rates and Charges for FY 1997-98 Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson presented the staff report. It was moved by Director Birdsall, seconded by Director Ford to approve staff recommendation as follows: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 97-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF A REPORT WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED RATES AND CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH The motion was unanimously carried. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT None given. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT None given. BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS None given. r:\minutea.csd\042297 -2- ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Director Lindemans, seconded by Director Ford, to adjourn at 7:40 PM to a meeting on May 13, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. Jeffrey E. Stone, President ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/ District Secretary r:\minutes.csd~042297 -3- ITEM 2 APPROV~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTOR CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services May 13, 1997 Authorization to Release a Formal Bid for the ADA Improvement Project PREPARED BY: Phyllis L. Ruse, Development Services Administrator RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors authorize the release of a formal public bid for the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvement Project. DISCUSSION: On May 14, 1996, the Board of Directors awarded a design contract with the Alhambra Group for the preparation of the schematic design drawings, construction documents, and project administration for the ADA Park Improvement Project. The project includes the following improvements: Veteran's Park: Sidewalk access to two tot lots; all-access play surfaces for two tot lots; park benches; all-access drinking fountain; ADA picnic table and benches; bar-be-cues. Calle Aragon Park: All-access play surface for tot lot; all-access drinking fountain. John Magee Park: Play structure installation; all-access play surface for tot lot; ADA picnic table and benches; sidewalk access to picnic facilities. Rancho California Sports Park: Sidewalk to tot lot; sidewalk, ramps, and striping from parking lot to Rancho Vista ball fields; ramp access to ball fields No. 1 and 2; foot bridge from parking lot across the creek to the tot lot; replacement of all-access play surface for tot lot. The construction documents are nearing completion and it is anticipated this project will be ready to bid within 30 days. Completion of the project will finalize the upgrades necessary to bring all City parks up to ADA standards and provide accessible play and recreational experience to people with disabilities. FISCAL IMPACT: The Engineer's cost estimate for this project is $212,974. This project is funded through a Community Development Block Grant and cost savings on the Rancho California Sports Park Improvement Project. Sufficient funds have been appropriated and budgeted in the current Capital Improvement Program for the project. ~': \c~gg~:lu'~d~bkl .cc ITEM 3 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: 1. APPROV~I~,. CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF F~I,a~I~..E,~ '~"-~'~ CITY MANAGERh/~W~ _ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager May 13, 1997 Release and Reduction of Landscape Bonds - The Companies (Highway 79 South at Redhawk Parkway) I~ ~C~eryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst That the Board of Directors: Presley Authorize the release of the Landscape Improvement Bonds for Tract Nos. 23267-2 and 23267-3 - The Presley Companies. Authorize the reduction of the Landscape Improvement Bonds for Tract No. 26861 - The Presley Companies. Direct the Secretary/City Clerk to notify the Developer and the Surety. BACKGROUND: Landscape/Erosion Control Agreements and Surety Bonds for the above referenced development were originally posted with the County of Riverside Building and Safety Department by: The Presley Companies 15010 Avenue of Science San Diego, CA 92128 On March 23, 1993, the Board of Directors authorized the acceptance of replacement bonds from the developer. The Surety Bonds were issued by American Motorists Insurance Company and are identified as follows: 1. Tract No. 23267-2: Bond No. 111 1925 6920 in the amount of $79,500. 2. Tract No. 23267-3: Bond No. 111 1925 6953 in the amount of $80,300. 3. Tract No. 26861: Bond No. 111 1925 6979 in the amount of $114,500. r. \yaainobk\pr~ley.lxir 051397 All interior open space areas and private recreation facilities within Tract No. 23267-3 are maintained by the home owner's association. The TCSD currently maintains perimeter landscaping within Tract No. 26861, with the exception of the proposed TCSD landscaping along Highway 79 South. This highway frontage includes the Caltrans right-of-way and an adjacent 5' landscape easement area within Tract No. 26861. Due to highway construction within the area, the developer was unable to begin construction of these areas until March, 1997. The TCSD and Planning Department have determined that the developer has completed all private and public landscaping requirements within Tract Nos. 23267-2 and -3 and recommends exoneration of the following bonds: 1. Tract No. 23267-2; Bond No. 111 1925 6920 in the amount of $79,500. 2. Tract No. 23267-3; Bond No. 111 1925 6953 in the amount of $80,300. Due to substantial completion of the private and public landscaping within Tract No. 26861, the developer has provided construction cost estimates for the remaining landscape improvements along Highway 79 South. Based upon a review of these estimates, staff is recommending a reduction to 25% of the original landscape improvement bond for Tract No. 26861, as follows: 1. Tract No. 26861 Bond No. 111 1925 6979 reduced to the amount of $28,625. The remaining bond amounts for Tract No. 26861 shall be retained until the improvements have been completed and accepted by the Board of Directors. Upon acceptance of the improvements, a 10% warranty amount shall be retained for a period of one year and until any claims filed during the warranty period have been settled. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2. Copy of Landscape Improvement Bonds. Memorandum from Planning Department. r:\yaamobk\prcslcy.bdr 051397 CITY OF TEMECULA BOND ~[[1 [925 692O Premium $716.00 SUBDIVISION FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND EROSION-LANDSCAPE WHEREAS, the City of Temecula. State of California, and THE PRESLEY COMPANZ~S (hereinafter designated as "Principal") have entered into an agreement whereoy Principal agrees to install and complete certain designated pubtic im!orovements. which said agreement, dated , 19 , and identified as Project Tract #23267-2 . is- hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, Principal is recluired under the terms of the agreement to furnish a bond for the Faithful performance of the agreement, NOW THEREFORE, we the Principal and ~l{Z AME~,ICAN INSURANCE COMPANY as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Temecula. California in the penal sum of $79.500.00 , lawful money of the United States, for r. he payment of such sum well and truly to be made. we bind ourselves. our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally. The condition of this obligation is such that the obligation will become null and void if the above-bounded Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns, shall in all things stand to, abide by, well and truly keep, anct perform the covenants, conditions, and provisions in the agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respec:s according to his or their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Temecuta, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated; otherwise. this obligation shall be and remain in full force and effec:. As a par: of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefore. there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and inciuded in any judgement rendered. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension 'of time, alteration or addition to-the terms of the agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in anyway affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change. extension of time. alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or :o the work or to the specifications. BND-003 1 081~4/90 CITY OF TEMECULA SUBDIVISION FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the Princi~3al and Surety above named, on January 21 , 19 93 Cerd~cate of Acknowledgement STATE OF CALr~ORNIA Coumry of c~z-~.n~ On January 21, 1993 pemonally appeared before me. Kathleen Viodes Victoria M. Camobell pemonaUy known :o me ( . ' ' ' ' [o be me personIs} whose namc~is) m/are stmscnbeo [o me · .vtthm instrument anti acJ~nowiedged to me ma~M~/sheJ~ execu[ed me sazae m/i~[/her/~ a4zr~orzzea capacxcyi/es), an(/that by :~Ther/~h]~l~ signature[s) on [he mscrumen: [he person(s), or the en[irf upon beha/f of whictt we peruore.s) ac:eo. execuce~ me ms[tureen:. (Seal) (Name) [ Titlel STATE OF: CALIFORNIA i SS. COUNTY OF' SAN DIEGO c m anti for sa~ ~ b H h,.,, , efore/1're ~,~-- · Na ..... ~r., pe~l,.'~:_'~-~ a~~"~"~ J. Webb a No~.. ~ ~ ~-o~ to me for .~. ~'~-' -m CO~omo~ · a~ suc8 common exe~ ~o ~ts bylaws or a resoiubon of its ~a~ of Oi~c~m. IN Wi~ESS ~EREOF. I have ~munto ~t my in an~ for ~ ~un~ ano State. ~e ~ay a~ Year ~mt a~ve wnEen. --VICTORIA M. CAMPBELL--- and to t~mct t.bc COrlX~mUon tAcrcey zs fully and to me smnc ext~nt as if sLu:h bc~Ls ~uon ~ d~ ~ bY ~u ~. ~ ~ ~ ~m ~s ~w~ of a~om~ is ~t~ p~[ to ~e VIL ~ ~5 ~ ~ of offs. ~oa 45. ~mur. ~e ~-- of t~ ha~ of ~M~, me ~k ~ V~~t ~ any m ~u ~mm ~ me ~ of D~ofi. t~e ~n of t~t h~ O( ~Ofi, ~ P~t or nut V~~t ARo~n~ ;o ~p~l H4 ~ for m on ~f of ~ ~n~n · ~r tp~mtm~t. Any su~ a~Mutmn; sad ~ namofi~ Z~ot~ t~ may ~ ~ot~ ~ ny ~ ~ me ~ of D~ or by uy ~a em~w~ to ~e suc~ ~s ~w~ of aRo~ is si~ ~d ~ ~d~ ~d by ~ au~ofiw of ~e foU~ng R~l~ou ~SU~ CO~P~ at a m~n8 d~y ~ ~ h~d on ~e 3 !st ~y of J~7. 19~. ~ md R~oi~on ~ not ~ ~d~ ~ t~: ~muon may ~ ~[~ or D~t~ on ~y ~w~ of ~om~. on any ~on ~n t~e Lsc ~yof Ju~e t9 90 STATE OF CALIFORNIA CO~ OF ~N By OnO:~ 1 ~1' ciay of T~n~ 19 O~ THE AMI/RICAH IIqSURAN~ COMPANY ,. I~/ote me !~ersoual~y came R. D. Fantsworch OFFICIAL SEAL NOTARY PUBLIG- CRUFORNIA Pnncqml Otficu in Mann CaunZy ~ OF C~O~ CO~ OF ~N I. ~e~~. R~d~t~t~of~~~ ~~CO~.a NEB~S~ 21st 0ayof January 19 93 360'71 I-TA-4*90 (REV~ CITY OF TEMECULA SUBDIVISION FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND EROSTION-LANDSCAPE BOND # 111 1925 6953 PREMIUM $723.00 WHEREAS, the City of Temecula, State of California, and TEE PRESLEY COMPANIES (hereinafter designated as "Principal'm) have entered into an agreement wneret~y Principal agrees to ins'call. and c~mplete cercain designated public improvementa, w~ich said agreement, da~ed . 19 . and identified as Project Tract #23267-3 Lots 66 thru 170 , is hereby referred to and matte a parc hereof; and WHEREAS, Principal is required under the terms of the agreement to furnish a bond for the Faithful performance of the agreement, NOWTHEREFORE, wethe Principal and ~{E AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY as Surety, are held and firmty bound unto the City of Temecuia, Caiiforma in 1:he penal sum of $ 80,300.00 , lawful money of the United States, for payment of such sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally. The condition of this obligation is such that the obligation will become null and void if the above-bounded Principal, his or its heirs, executors, adminis~j~[ors, successors. or assigns, shall in all things stand to, abide by, well and truty keel=, and per-~orm the covenants, conditions, and provisions in the agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or their parc, to be kept anct per'formed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to his or their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Temecula, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated; other~ise, this obligation shall be and remain in full force and effect. As a parc of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amour~ specified therefore, there shall be included c~s%s and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enfor~h~ such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and intruded in any judgement rendered. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no Change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work to be per'formed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in anyway affec= its obligations on this b~nd, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time. alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifqcal:ion~. BND-00~ 1 08/14-190 CITY OF TEMECULA SUBDIVISION FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND Page 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and Surety above named. on January 21 . 19 93 Certificate of Acknowledgemen[ ST.LTE OF CALIFORNIA ] County of Ctr-~'ng',~ j January 21, 1993 Kathleen Viodes On before me. personallyappezred Vic:or±a M. Campbell personally known m me (ur..a~.-- ' ' ' to be ttte person(s) whme hAmels) L~aze suoscnbecl to r~e w~hm instrument and acknowledged to me ~a~ll~)Yshe. EJ(M~ execu:ed the same m)[K/ber/~ ~ucbonzed c~pac~cg[ies), and tha: by · r/~ signature[s) on ;be inscrtLmen~ :be person(s), or ~.e enn:7 upon beha~ 0f whicA me petson(s) acr~t. e~ecuma · . .t~S my ha.nd/a~d officiaJ se~L Sign2mre .. ~~ KATHLEEN VIeDES NgTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIAi PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN ORANGE COUNTY MY COL:MISSION EXPIRES MAY 4, 1994 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO { Title) . before me. Nancy J. Webb. a Notary Public in ancl for satcl S~ate, personally alOpea/~:~-;~d John H. Naborl, Jr., peaanally known to me (or proyea on b'te basins of selisfact~ry ericlance) to be the persons who executed the with~ instrument as St. Vice President an= Vice PrNidmtt on behalf of the co~oration thereto name= aclmowieclgeO to me !~a! sucl~ corporatio~ axacuteO the within instmmant pursuant to ~t$ bylaws or a rasoiul~on of its ~Oal~l of Direly. IN WITNESS THEREOF. I have hereunto set my hand and a~xed my officiaJ seal, in ancl for saict County and Sram, the Oay and year lirst above wntten. FOR NOTARIAL STAMP ,mrss;on expires 6/3~{~4 L~ pOW"~t OF ,U'IO~ THE At%IERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY KNOW ALL MEf~ BY ~E P~: ~t ~E A~ERIC~ INSU~N~ COMP--. a ~uon ~t~ un~ t~ ~ of t~e St~ N~ Je~ off Fcn~ ~. 18~. ~ r~om~t~ to rag S~te o~ Neo~t~ on June ~. l~. ~ ~ s~ ~ ofF~ tn ~ City o~ Om~. St and to bind the Corpor~uon ,~e~etz,/' -~ fu. Uy and to the ~e m~ u if ~ ~ ~ ~ by ~ ~ ~ ~ ~e ~ ~ of me ~uon ~d ~my ~ by ~u ~. h~ ~ '~g aria ~nf~l ~ ~ ~ ~ A~s~F~ ~ ~ m ~ ~. ~ ~ of a~o~ u ~t~ O~[ to ~e ~I. ~o~ 45 ~d ~ of By~ of~ ~~ ~~ ~MP~Y now m f~ fo~ ~d eff~. Section dS. Aopomfmf~r. The C~jmF. ws.- of the h~ of Dido,. ~ ~ ~y ~~ or ~ ~ ~u ~o~ by t~ ~ of ~no~i:~ to ~pmt and m for ~ on ~f of the ~uou ~ A~u m ~( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ for aM oa ~df of the ~o~Doa. ~ou ~. Aa~on~. ~ nut~o~ of su~ R~d~t ~ (6---~t ~u~. Anou~t~ a~ AI~O s~ ~u ~ in the t~m~t ~r tOHmtm~t. Any su~ nDpotntm~t nnd ~ nu~o~ g~nt~ t~ may ~ ~o,~ m nyse by ~e ~ or ~ou or 0y uy ~u em~ me su~ ~SU~ CO~P~ at a m~g d~y ~ ~ held on t~e 3 [st day of J~y. 19~. ~d ~d R~t~on ~ nm ~ ~fi~ or r~: ~uoa may ~ ~(F~ or pfint~ on ~y ~w~ o( zttom~. on ~y t~on of ~y ~ o~ ~m~. or on ~y ~fi~te r~ ~o ~ ~y ~wer of atto~. ~y r~uon o( ~y pow~ o( 3tto~. or ~ ~ns ~ f~e si~ ~ f-~ttc ~ s~ ~ v~d ~ mnmnc u~n ~e Co~uonF iSC ~yof June t9 90 By 'I'KE ~CAN INSURANCE COMPANY IIIIIIIIIHIII I!!11 411111111Ilium, ~. OFFICIAL SEAL =~ J M VANDEVORT = NOTARY PUBLIC- CAUFORNIA = ~ Sh"mcs~ml Offic~ m Mann C~imty ~TATE OF CA~.II~ORI~IA COUNTY OF MARfN Silent anti se~ed at ~e County of Mann. Dated 21st ~yof January t9 ~ .%60711 -TA-~-9~ ~ CITY' OF TEMECULA SUBDIVISION FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND EROSION-LANDSCAPE BOND #111 1925 6979 PREMIUM $1,031.00 WHERF_A.~o the City of Temecula, State of California, and THE PRESLEY COMi~ANIES J hereinafter designated as "Principal") have entered into an agreement whereDy Principal agrees to install. and comptete certain designated public improvemen*s, which said agreement. dated . 19 , and identified as Pro~ecl: Tract #23299 (superceded by TR#26861) , is hereby referred to and made a par'[ hereof; and' WHERE,~,S, Principal is required under the terms of the agreement to furnish a bond for the Faithful performance of the agreement, NOWTHEREFORE, we the Principal and THE /L~ERICAH INS~CE COMI~A/~y as Surety, are held'and firmly bound unto the City of Temecula. California in the penal sum of $ 114,500.00 , lawful money of the United States, for the payment of such sum well and truly to be made. we bind ourselves, our heirs. successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally. The condition of this obligation is such that the obligation will became null and void if the above-bounded Principal, his or its heirs, executors. administ~'~tor~, successors, or assigns. shall in all things stand to, abide by, well and ~ruty keep, and perform the covenan*s, conditions, and provisions in the agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part. to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to his or their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Temecula, its officers, agents and employees. as therein stipulated; otherwise, this obligation shall be and remain in full force and effect. As a part of the ob!igation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefore, there shall be included cos*s and reasonable expenses and fe~s, including reasonable attorney's fees. incur~'ed by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as cos*s and included in any judgement rendered. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees .that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of .[he agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in anyway affecl: its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition [o the te~ms of the agreement or to the work or to the specificationS. BN'O.-003 1 0~1114190 CiTY OF TEMECULA SUBDIVISION FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND Page 2 Ce~ificaze of Acknowledgemen[ STAT~ OF CA!,r~ORNIA ] Coum~ of Orcariga Km~h~een Viodes On January 21, 1993 befomme. pemonat~y appeared Victoria M. Camobail ipersonally known :o me (~.a.,u~,~e~.a- ;.__~.,e.~.;~ .. '~iam~ to ~ ~e pemon(s) wh~ n~s) ~ s~b~ m me width ~r~enr and ~nowi~g~ m me ~sh~ ~c:~ ~e ~e m~/~ ~o~ ~i~), ~d ~ by ~her/~ st~s) on ~e i~en; ~e ~n(s), 0r ~e ~ upon be~ of whi~ ~e p~on(s) ~. V~T~ESS m~h~nd officm~ se~. KATHLEEN VIODES ';"'~-~----~ ORANGE COUNTy MY COMMISSION [XPIR[S MAY 4. 1994j STATE OF CALIFORNIA } SS. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO } On /- ,:~.~"--<~3 , before me. Nancy J. Webb, a Notary Pubhc mn and for said State, personally appeared O,.,ahJ P. l~dc.,.am ~nd John H. Nabors. Jr.. personally known to me (or proved on Ihe bas~s of satisfactory ev,~enca) to ~e l~e persons who executed ~e wfihin instnJment as ~ ~e.ideml and Vice Pr~ident on pehalf of the co.oral, on I~erein nameel and acV. now~eclgecl to me Ir~at such co~0orat~on executacl ~0 w~thin instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a resolul~on of its Board of Directors. IN WITNESS THEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixact my official seat, m anti for sa,d County anct State. ~e day and .year first above written. FOR NOTARIAL STAMP ~My commission expires .4_---ro~'~g'Y THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY 'NOW ALL MEN BY THF..SE PRESEN'f~: That TH£ AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY. a CorlMcaUon m~rlMt-ate~l under tlw la~s of the State of w Jersey on Fcoruary 20. 18d6. ,n~I re~lomcstzcalecI to tr~¢ State of Ne0ra.sl~& on June t. l~0. ~n~l havmI its pt"m~oil o(f%cc m r~e City o( Om,%tu. Stale o( :Dr'uKL ~LI maGc. con.lmute~ and appcnntcq. and docs oy t~c~c prcscfiu ma~c. consmute zn~ aG~)om[ ~VICTORIA M. CAMPBELL--- Lad all bonds. ~ctcr,~ t~,,_. r~[mnmnms or order wrmen obiigauo~ m tAe nature th~eo( Lad to bind tint C~rpornnon Wcrel~y ~.~ fuUy ~d to the ~c mint u if s~ ~ w~e ~ ~ me ~d~ ~s ~w~ of z~o~ is ~t~ ~t to ~de VIL ~om 45 ~ ~ of By~ of~ ~RI~ cff~. ~on ~. ~p~r. ~ ~n of me ~ of Di~o~. me ~ ~ ~~t or ~ ~ ~u au~ ~ ~ ~ of D~ou, me ~ of me ~ of D~o~ ~ P~d~t or any V~m m% fMm ~ Ano~n*Ft~ to ~nl ~d ~ f~ ud on ~f of tGe ~u~ ~ A~u to ~i ~ ~o~fioa. ~oa ~. ~amo~. ~e nut~ of su~ R~t ~at ~, Afio~m sad A~ mar t~mtmu~ Any suc~ t0Mmmut and ~ aut~m~ tnnt~ t~0y m~ ~ ~o~ at ~y ~ by ~e su~ t0pQm~ent.'* ~rau~n tony ~ ~ ~r ~nnt~ on ~y ~w~ of &tto~. on any r~uon of ~y ~ of azrock, or On ~ ~y power of ztt~c% ~y r~nQn of ~y ~ower of ~tto~. or ~fi~ ~ ~c~ f~c ~ or f~*m*ie ~ l~ ~ ~ ~ bln~ u~n me Co~or~uon7 lsc ~yo( June t~ 90 CO~ OF ~a~at~cCo~tyofM~.Dat~the 21st ~yof January t9 93 34,071 I-TA-~-t}0 (RE¥I TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Beryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst / Rolfe Preisendanz, Community Development Technician March 6, 1997 Release of Bond No. 11119256920, Tract 23267-2 and Bond No. 11119256953, Tract 23267-3 for Landscape Improvements and reduction of Bond No. 11119256979, Tract No. 26861 Upon request of Presley of San Diego to release Bond No. 11119256920, Tract 23267-2 and Bond No. 11119256953, Tract 23267-3, I have performed a site inspection and have found the areas included in the aforementioned bonds to be fully completed and am hereby recommending release of said bonds. cc: Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager R:LPI..ANN1N(3~23267.LTR 4/29/97 k~ APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECtOr. ~ CITY MANAGER ,h/~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: May 13, 1997 SUBJECT: Award Contract - TCSD Tree Trimming Services PREPARED BY: (~ Bruce A. Hartley, Maintenance Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Award contract of $18,199 to Laan's Tree Service to provide tree trimming services for TCSD slope maintenance areas within the Mirada, and Villages tracts. Approve appropriation of $9,190 to the Service Level 'C' Repair and Maintenance - Facilities account #193-180-999-5212. BACKGROUND: The TCSD received bids for the trimming of the trees on City maintained slopes. Laan's Tree Service submitted the lowest price for the Mirada, and Villages Tracts. The funds budgeted for tree trimming are necessary to provide appropriate maintenance to perimeter landscaping and slope areas. During this Fiscal Year, additional revenue has been collected by the Community Services Department for plan check and inspection services. Therefore, it is recommended that $9,190 be appropriated from this additional revenue to offset a portion of the tree trimming costs. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of the tree trimming services is $18,199. The appropriation will help offset the contract services cost related to the tree trimming services and will increase the Service Level 'C' FY 96-97 budget by $9,190. Attachments: 1 ) Agreement 2) Specifications r/hartlcyb/ag~-ndas/tr~ea.97 PROFFSSIONAL S!=RVICFS This Agreement was made and entered into this 13th day of May 1997, by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and Laan's Tree Service (" Contractor"). The parties hereto mutually agree as follows: Services. Contractor shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Contractor shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in Exhibit man. Performance. Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Contractor hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. Payment. The City agrees to pay Contractor following completion of specified work. An amount not to exceed $18.199 the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved by the City Council; provided that the City Manager may approve additional payment not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the Agreement; but in no event more than $10,000.00. Contractor will submit invoices upon completion of specified work for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended so long as such amendment is in writing and agreed upon by both the City Council and Contractor. Ownership of Documents. Upon satisfactory completion of or in the event of termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Contractor. o Termination. The City may terminate this Agreement without cause so long as written notice of intent to terminate is given to Contractor at least three (3) days prior to the termination date. In the event of termination, Contractor shall be paid for the services performed. Indemnification. The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Contractor's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. r/harOcyb/agenda~/tre~.97 10. 11. 12. Status of Contractor. Contractor is an independent contractor in all respects in the performance of this Agreement and shall not be considered an employee of the City for any purpose. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. Term. This Agreement shall commence on May 13, 1997, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 1997. Subcontracts. The Contractor shall not enter into any subcontracts for services to be rendered toward the completion of the Contractor's portion of this Agreement without the consent of the City. At all times, ! a~n's Tree Services shall be primarily responsible for the performance of the tasks described herein. Contractor shall provide City with fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of from Contractor's employ. Upon such notice, the City shall have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement. Upon termination of this Agreement, Contractor's sole compensation shall be for the value of service rendered to the City. Default. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default. Default shall include not performing the tasks described herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager of the City. Failure by the Contractor to make progress in the performance of work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and without fault or negligence of the Contractor, shall not be considered a default. Notices. Notices shall be given pursuant to this Agreement by personal service on the party to be notified, or by written notice upon such party deposited in the custody of the United States Postal Service addressed as follows: City: Attention: City Manager City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Dr., P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Contractor: John !aan. Owner ! aan's Tree Service. 25060 Hancock Ave. !03 Suite 247 Murrieta. CA 9?56? The notices shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of personal service, or three (3) days after the date of deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service. r/h~tlcyb/~ge~d~/tre~.97 FXHIBIT "A" TASKS TO BF PERFORMFD/SCOPE OF WORK Furnish all labor and materials necessary to trim 867 trees eighteen feet and taller within the Mirada, and Villages landscape maintenance areas in accordance with the specifications and agreement. All material to be disposed of off site and work area to be left thoroughly clean. Work to be completed in one continuous operation and at no time shall the performance of the work block any public street or create a hazard to the public. Exhibit A - pg. 1 of 11 T.C.S.D. TREE TRIMMING sPr:CIFICATIONS SECTION 500 - GENERAL 500-1 Scope of Work The scope of work in complete, continuous, consistent and safe tree maintenance of the designated tree species as specified in the contract work order. Tree maintenance may consist of: pruning, raising, training, removals and planting. The Contractor shall provide all equipment, labor and materials necessary for performing tree maintenance according to the specifications herein. Selective pruning shall be employed at all times following the Western Chapter International Society of Arboriculture's pruning standards as specified in Appendix A. The City Engineer, or his designated representative, shall be the sole judge as to the adequacy and quality of maintenance. Where the City Engineer is mentioned in these Special Provisions, it shall be noted that his designated representative may act in his behalf regarding administration of this agreement. 500-2 Supervision The Contractor shall assign a supervisor to be on site each working day, working regular working hours, for the duration of this contract. The Contractor and the supervisor, shall have expertise and experience in Arboriculture, pest control, soils, fertilizers and plant identification. The supervisor must be fluent in the English language. The Contractor and the supervisor shall have the knowledge and ability to determine each tree species response to pruning, and to be able to properly prune the tree species listed on the work orders. 500-3 Communications Each supervisor shall carry a pager provided by the Contractor, and be on call 24 hours per day for emergencies within the contract areas. 500-4 Nonresponsiveness of Contractor Failure of the Contractor or the supervisors to immediately respond to the City Engineer's telephone or pager notification of an emergency condition, or failure of the Contractor to respond within two days of written notification by the City Engineer, shall give the City Engineer the right to cause necessary work to be performed by City crews or other contractors, and any costs incurred in so doing shall be deducted from payment if the work is related to any work order issued to the Contractor by the City. Exhibit A - pg. 2 of 11 SECTION SECTION SECTION SECTION 501 - CERTIFICATION Prior to acceptance of the contract bid, the Contractor must hold a valid Certified Arborist Certificate, issued by the International Society of Arboriculture. It is desirable to have Certified Tree Workers on staff. The Contractor must supply a photocopy of all certifications at time of bid. 502 - SCHEDULING OF WORK The Contractor shall accomplish all normal work required under this contract between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. The City Engineer may grant, on an individual basis, permission to perform contract maintenance at other hours. No maintenance functions that generate excess noise which would cause annoyance to residents of the area shall be commenced before 8:00 a.m. The City Engineer will be notified in writing at least 24 hours in advance of each start date of tree maintenance operations, 503 - UNDERGROUND ALERT The Contractor will comply with the requirements of Assembly Bill 73. The law states that, "...every person planning to conduct any excavation is required to contact a regional notification center at least 2 days prior to excavation..." Assembly Bill 73 defines excavation as, "...any operation in which earth, rock, or other material in the ground is moved, removed, or otherwise displaced by means of tools, equipment, or explosives in any of the following ways: grading, trenching, digging, ditching, drilling, auguring, tunneling, scraping, cable or pipe plowing and driving, or any other way." 504- MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT (a) The Contractor will be paid within thirty days of invoice submittal based upon the Schedule of Unit Cost and lump sum amounts. The invoice shall include the appropriate fund number and the purchase order number for this contract. (b) The quantity invoiced and paid shall be the total tree count shown in the work order except that the City Engineer shall have the right to increase or decrease the total quantity based upon documented field tree count. Payment will be made after verification of completion by the City Engineer. Trees which, in the opinion of the City Engineer, have not been maintained in accordance with the Contract Special Provisions will be deducted from the invoiced amount. (c) Extra work shall be separately invoiced in accordance with the hourly rates and unit prices provided in the supplementary "Extra Work Schedule" of the contract bid proposal. (d) Any tree(s) included in the work order which have been pruned by a resident or homeowner and have been trained, cut, or sheared in such a way to form a hedge, espalier, or picturesque shape, and have not been trained in the normal landscape shade tree standard of pruning shall not be trimmed. These r/hastleyb/agemla~/tre~.97 Exhibit A - pg. 3 of 11 trees are to be noted and the Contractor shall inform the City Engineer of such trees by address. These trees will be deducted from the work order prior to invoice submittal. SECTION 505 - WORK ORDERS Work Orders will be provided by the Tree Maintenance Superintendent. They will include a descriptive location by address, street name, tree species, type of work and number of trees. SECTION 506 - DELETIONS At the Tree Maintenance Superintendent's option, any work orders, or portion thereof, may be deleted by notifying the Contractor in writing. SECTION 507 - EXTRA WORK (a) Extra work may be required in order to plant new tree species or mitigate safety hazards. (b) Extra work will not be performed without prior approval by the Tree Maintenance Superintendent unless a condition exists wherein it appears there is a danger of injury to persons or property. (c) Payment of extra work shall be in accordance with the hourly rates and unit prices in the Extra Work Schedule. (d) The City reserves the right to cause any extra work deemed necessary by the Tree Maintenance Superintendent to be performed by the City crews, other contractors, or day labor, at no cost to the Contractor. SECTION 508 - SAFETY MEASURES Contractor shall follow the Cal OSHA, SB198, and American National Standard Institute requirements for worker safety. SECTION 509 o INSPECTIONS On a daily basis, or as required, the Contractor or his supervisor will walk the project with the Tree Maintenance Superintendent for the purpose of determining compliance with the specifications or to discuss required work. Any specific problem area which does not meet the conditions of the specifications set forth herein shall be called to the attention of the Contractor and, if not corrected, payment to the Contractor will not be made until the condition is corrected. SECTION 510- PRESERVATION OF PROPERTY (a) The Contractor shall carefully protect from damage all trees, shrubs, ground covers, turf, irrigation, water service, fences, sidewalk, buildings, automobiles, street lights, street signs or any other facilities located on or adjacent to the job site. Exhibit A - pg. 4 of 11 (b) Should any direct or indirect damage or injury result to any public or private property by or on account of any act, omission, neglect or misconduct in the execution of work, on the part of the contractor or Contractor's employees, such property shall be restored by the Contractor, to a condition equivalent to that existing before damage occurred. (c) The Contractor shall be responsible for the complete removal and replacement of trees lost due to Contractor's faulty maintenance or negligence, as determined by the Tree Maintenance Superintendent. Replacement shall be made by the Contractor in the kind and size of trees as determined by the Tree Maintenance Superintendent. Where there is a difference in value between the trees lost and the replacement of trees, this difference will be deducted from the contract payment. In all cases, the value of the trees lost will be determined by the Tree Maintenance Superintendent using the latest International Shade Tree Conference guidelines for value determination. SECTION 511 - PRUNING TOOLS The use of chain saws generally shall be restricted to those cuts which cannot be made with hydraulic, pneumatic or manually operated lopping shears. SECTION 512 - QUALITY OF WORK (a) The Contractor shall follow specifications as set forth by the Western Chapter International Society of Arboriculture's Pruning Standards. See Appendix A. (b) Pruning standards shall apply to all City trees designated for pruning by the Tree Maintenance Superintendent. (c) Contractor shall prune to retain the natural form of each tree species unless otherwise directed by the Tree Maintenance Superintendent. (d) City crews may provide "sample prunes" for the Contractor to duplicate on the designated species. If the Contractor is required to follow a "sample prune", it will be indicated on the work order. (e) Contractor shall be consistent in their pruning patterns so that visual continuity is maintained and that the value of all City trees pruned is increased. (f) Pruning for safety or crown restoration is desired when the tree has an abnormal, unsafe, or unattractive imbalance and shall be pruned so as to correct this condition. (g) At no time under this contract agreement shall the Contractor decrease the value of any tree without written authorization from the Tree Maintenance Superintendent. (h) Contractor must submit to the Tree Maintenance Superintendent, a Quality Control Plan at the time of bid submission. The Quality Control Plan shall provide contractor management with an effective and efficient means of identifying and correcting problems throughout the entire scope of operations. This will include the staffing of an Arborist certified through the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) for the entire length of the contract as Site Supervisor (certification required and at least 50% of the trimming crew staff) ~ ~ ~ (i) The QCP shall include: (1) A description of the Contractor's quality control system. The system must cover all contract services, specify work to be inspected on either a scheduled or unscheduled basis, and describe how inspections are to be conducted. (2) The name(s) and qualifications of the individual(s) responsible for performing the quality control inspections, and the extent of their authority. (3) Provisions for recording the results of inspections and for recording corrective action taken. (4) Provisions to update and revise the QCP during the performance of the contract. (j) A file of all Quality Control inspections both performed and scheduled, inspection results, and dates and details of corrective actions taken shall be maintained by the Contractor through the term of this contract. The file shall be the property of the Government and made available to the Contracting Officer during regular working hours. The file shall be turned over to the Contracting Officer within (number of days) of completion/termination of the contract. SECTION 51 3 - CROWN RAISING (a) Low branches overhanging park and residential streets shall be raised to a height of thirteen (13) feet above street grade. Low branches overhanging sidewalks and parkways shall be raised to a height of nine (9) feet above grade. Tree branches overhanging equestrian trail shall be raised to a height of eleven (11) feet. Small trees with a natural shape and form would be ruined by applying the above specifications and should be "side pruned" to reduce any current hazards. SECTION 514 - TREE REMOVALS (a) Trees designated for removal by the City Engineer will be marked with an X, using orange paint, on the trunk of the tree. If for any reason there is doubt regarding the tree(s) to be removed, the City Engineer shall be contacted before work commences. (b) All trees shall be removed in sections and no single section shall exceed five feet (5') in length. Trunks and/or limbs over six inches (6") in diameter shall be cut in sections not to exceed five feet (5') in length, and lowered to the ground. The means of lowering shall be acceptable to the City Engineer. r/lmrtleyb/age, ndaMtre~.97 Exhibit A - pg. 6 of 11 (c) All stumps and large surface roots shall be removed and ground out below surface grade. Grinding of stump and roots shall not be less than twelve inches (12") below existing grade and area shall be back filled with grinding chips and native soil to re-establish grade. SECTION 515 - TRAINING (a) Young trees that need training shall be pruned to promote natural shape. Under no circumstances will stripping of lower branches (raising up) of young trees be permitted. For the purpose of this section, lower branches are defined as those branches growing along the tree's trunk between the lowest canopy branch and the base of the tree. Lower branches shall be retained in the "headed back" condition leaving 4-6 leaves on the stem. This will promote increase caliper and tapered trunk. If there are any doubts or questions regarding this operation, contact the City Engineer. Tree training operations may include staking, restaking, stake removal, typing retying, or untying. These operations will follow Section 518, TREE STAKING SPECIFICATIONS. Trees will be assessed individually for their staking and typing needs during the tree training operation. SECTION 516 - METHOD OF PRUNING PALM TREES (a) All dead or drooping fronds shall be removed as close to the trunk as possible leaving a V-shaped base. (b) All frond stubs left from previous pruning shall be removed as close as possible to the trunk leaving a V-shaped base. (c) Fruit stalks present at time of pruning shall be removed and cut as close to their base as possible. (d) Palm fronds are to be removed so that a 45 degree or 90 degree angle is achieved as designated on the work order. The angle is measured from the horizontal axis of the growing point base. Each palm shall be trimmed of all remnants. See Appendix C. (e) The use of climbing spurs or gaffs will not be permitted. SECTION 517 - TREE PLANTING The Contractor shall follow the requirements of Section 503, UNDERGROUND ALERT of this Contract before digging any holes for tree planting. (a) For each tree to be planted, the Contractor shall follow the City Standard for Planting set forth in Appendix D. SECTION 518 - TREE STAKING SPECIFICATIONS See Appendix D. (a) Any tree that can stand upright without support and can return to an upright position after being deflected by wind or by hand shall not be staked. r/harfieyblagenda~/t. reea.97 Exhibit A - pg. 7 of 11 (b) If it is determined that the stakes should be removed, the Contractor shall pull the stakes from the soil. Breaking stakes off at grade will not be permitted. (c) All undamaged tree stakes removed during maintenance operations shall be returned to the City. Damaged stakes shall be disposed of by the Contractor. (d) If upon determining a tree cannot support itself, two (2) tree stakes shall be used and placed in a northwest and southeast configuration to give maximum support during heavy wind conditions. Stakes are to be placed as far away from trunk as possible, while still being able to attach the tree tie. Stakes shall be cut off below the lowest branch where the tree's growth habit permits. (e) Tree stakes shall be of good quality treated lodge pole pine and shall not exceed eight feet (8') in length and no more than two and one-half inches (2- 1/2") in diameter. (f) Tree ties shall be V.I.T. cinch-ties or equal and are to be attached by a method of a figure eight loop between the tree trunk and each stake. Ties shall be attached to stakes by method of a galvanized nail driven into tree stakes. A minimum of two (2) V.I.T. cinch-ties shall be used. (g) Ties are to be placed in such a way to allow movement of tree and to prevent tree trunk from rubbing against the stake. Ties shall not be tight or inflexible or create damage to tender bark or girdle the tree trunk. (h) Tree ties that are causing a girdling condition of tree trunk shall be removed. If any material is embedded in the growing tissue of a tree, and it is determined that the material cannot be removed without damage to the growing tissue of the tree, it shall not be removed. The City Engineer shall be notified of any such condition. SECTION 519 - REMOVAL OF BRUSH AND DEBRIS (a) Contractor shall be responsible for the removal and disposal of all debris, prunings, brush, and other material resulting from tree maintenance operations. (b) Contractor must comply with all state, local and county laws and ordinances applicable to and governing such disposal. (c) Disposal of all eucalyptus wood infested with the larvae of the eucalyptus longhorned borer shall follow the State of California Public Resources Code, Article 5, Section 4714.5. Exhibit A - pg. 8 of 11 APPENDIX A PRUNING STANDARDS PURPOSE: Trees and other woody plants respond in specific and predictable ways to pruning and other maintenance practices. Careful study of these responses has led to pruning practices which best preserve and enhance the beauty, structural integrity, and functional value of trees. In an effort to promote practices which encourage the preservation of tree structure and health, the V.W. ISA Certifications Committee has established the following Standards of pruning for Certified Arborist. The Standards are presented as working guidelines, recognizing that trees are individually unique in form and structure, and that their pruning needs may not always fit strict rules. The Certified Arborist must take responsibility for special pruning practices that vary greatly from these Standards: PRUNING TECHNIQUES A thinning cut removes a branch at its point of attachment or shortens it to a lateral large enough to assume the terminal role. Thinning opens up a tree, reduces weight on heavy limbs, can reduce a tree's height, distributes ensuing invigoration throughout a tree and helps retain the trees natural shape. Thinning cuts are therefore preferred in tree pruning. A heading cut removes a branch to a stub, a bud or a lateral branch not large enough to assume the terminal role. Heading cuts should seldom be used because vigorous, weakly attached upright sprouts are forced just below such cuts, and the tree's natural form is altered. In some situations, branch stubs die or produce only weak sprouts. When removing a live branch, pruning cuts should be made in branch tissue just outside the branch bark ridge and collar, which are trunk tissue. (Figure 1) If no collar is visible, the angle of the cut should approximate the angle formed by the branch bard ridge and the trunk. (Figure 2) When removing a dead branch, the final cut should be made outside the collar of live callus tissue. If the collar has grown out along the branch stub, only the dead stub should be removed, the live collar should remain intact and uninjured. (Figure 3) When reducing the length of a branch or the height of a leader, the final cut should be made just beyond (without violating) the branch bark ridge of the branch being cut to. The cut should approximately bisect the angle formed by the branch bark ridge and an imaginary line perpendicular to the trunk or branch cut. (Figure 4) r/Ixa~¢yb/agcndaa/tre~.97 Exhibit A - pg. 9 of 11 A goal of structural pruning is to maintain the size of lateral branches to less than three-fourths the diameter of the parent branch or trunk. If the branch is codominant or close to the size of the parent branch, thin the branch's foliage by 15% to 25%, particularly near the terminal. Thin the parent branch less, if at all. This will allow the weight of the lateral branch, slow its total growth, and develop a stronger branch attachment. If this does not appear appropriate, the branch may need to be shortened to a large lateral or be completely removed. (Figure 5) On Large-growing trees, except whorl-branching conifers, branches that are more than one-third the diameter of the trunk should be spaced along the trunk at least 18 inches apart, on center. If this is not possible because of the present size of the tree, such branches should have their foliage thinned 15% to 25%, particularly near their terminals and/or be shortened. (Figure 6) Pruning cuts should be clean and smooth with the bark at the edge of the cut firmly attached to the wood. Large or heavy cut branches should be lowered on roped or thrown clear to prevent injury to personnel, the tree or other property. Wound dressings and tree paints have not been shown to be effective in preventing or reducing decay. They are therefore not recommended for routine use when pruning. TYPES OF PRUNING - MATURE TREES Crown Cleaning Crown cleaning or cleaning out is the removal of dead, dying, diseased, crowded, weakly attached, and low-vigor branches and water sprouts from a tree crown. Crown Thinning Crown Thinning includes crown cleaning and the selective removal of branches to increase light penetration and air movement into the crown. Increased light and air stimulates and maintains interior foliage, which in turn improves branch taper and strength. Thinning reduces the wind-sail effect of the crown and the weight of heavy limbs. Thinning the crown can emphasize the structural beauty of trunk and branches as well as improve the growth of plants beneath the tree by increasing light penetration. When thinning the crown of mature trees, seldom should more than one-third of the live foliage be removed. At least one-half of the foliage should be on branches that arise in the lower two-thirds of the trees, likewise, when thinning laterals from a limb, an effort should be made to retain inner lateral branches and leave the same distribution of foliage along the branch. Trees and branches so pruned will have stress more evenly distributed throughout the tree or along a branch. III. IV. An effect known as "lion's-tailing" results from pruning out the inside lateral branches. Lion's-tailing, by removing all the inner foliage, displaces the weight to the ends of the branches and may result in sunburned branches, water sprouts, weakened branch structure and limb breakage. C. Crown Reduction Crown reduction is used to reduce the height and/or spread of a tree. Thinning cuts are most effective in maintaining the structural integrity and natural form of a tree and in delaying the time when it will need to be pruned again. The lateral to which a branch or trunk is cut should be at least one-half the diameter of the cut being made. D. Crown Raising Crown raising removes the lower branches of a tree in order to provide clearance for building, vehicles, pedestrians, and vistas. It is important that a tree have at least one-half of its foliage on branches that originate in the lower two-thirds of its crown to ensure a well-formed, tapered structure and to uniformly distribute stress within the tree. When pruning for view, it is preferable to develop "windows" through the foliage of the tree, rather than to severely raise or reduce the crown. SIZE OF PRUNING CUTS Each of the Pruning Techniques (Section I) and types of Pruning (Section II) can be done to different levels of detail or refinement. The removal of many small branches rather than a few large branches will require more time, but will produce a less pruned appearance, will force fewer water sprouts and will help to maintain the vitality and structure of the tree. Designating the maximum size (base diameter) that any occasional undesirable branch may be left within the tree crown, such as ¥=", 1" or 2" branch diameter, will establish the degree or pruning desired. CLIMBING TECHNIQUES Climbing and pruning practices should not injure the tree except for the pruning cuts. Climbing spurs or gaffs should not be used when pruning a tree, unless the branches are more than throw-line distance apart and cannot be reached with an aerial tower. In such cases, the spurs should be removed once the climber is tied in. C. Spurs may be used to reach an injured climber and when removing a tree. Do Rope injury to thin barked trees from loading out heavy limbs should be avoided by installing a block in the tree to carry the load. This technique may also be used to reduce injury to a crotch from the climber's line. Exhibit A - pg. 11 of 11 ITEM 5 APPRO~/~,,C"~/ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FII~A~,~E i ~ C'TY MANAGER ~~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: May 13, 1997 SUBJECT: TCSD Proposed Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 1997-1998 PREPARED BY: ~ ~Beryl Y asinosky, Development Services Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING, SLOPE MAINTENANCE, RECYCLING AND REFUSE COLLECTION, AND STREET AND ROAD IMPROVEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997- 1998. BACKGROUND: The purpose of the TCSD Rates and Charges is to provide necessary community services and programs to property owners within the City of Temecula. The TCSD operates under the authority of Community Services District Law and its boundaries are the same as those of the City of Temecula. Historically, the operations and maintenance of the City's park and recreation programs and arterial street lighting were funded as separate service levels through the collection of the TCSD Rates and Charges. However, in accordance with Proposition 218, the Community Services, Parks and Recreation and Arterial Street Lighting Rates and Charges previously levied by the TCSD will be replaced by the City of Temecula's special tax approved by voters as Measure C on March 4, 1997. The Temecula Parks/Lighting Service special tax levy budget will be considered by the City Council on June 10, 1997. As a result, the TCSD is currently comprised of the following four (4) remaining service levels: Service ! evel B - Residential Street ! ights. Operations, maintenance, utility costs and administration of residential street lighting. R: \yasinobk\tcsdlevy.97 051397 Service ! evel C - Perimeter ! andscaping and Slope Maintenance. Operations, maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and administration for all perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD. Service ! evel D - Refuse Collection. Recycling and Street Sweeping. Operation and administration of the refuse and recycling program, and street sweeping services for single family residences. Service Level R - Streets and Roads. Operations, construction, and maintenance of streets and roads throughout the City. Service Level "B" includes only those property owners within residential subdivisions that have street lighting services. The proposed rate of $25.68 per property owner has not been increased from last fiscal year. Service Level "C" includes only those property owners within residential subdivisions receiving TCSD maintenance of slopes and perimeter landscaping. The four (4) rate levels for Service Level "C" will not increase from last year and are identified as follows: Rate C-1: $ 46.00 Rate C-2: $ 89.00 Rate C-3: $116.00 Rate C-4: $175.00 Also, the Rancho Highlands Community Association has submitted a written request for the TCSD to assume the maintenance of additional slope and landscaping within the Rancho Highlands development beginning FY 1997-98. The proposed dedication of the additional slope area will necessitate an increase in the existing maintenance charge of $46.00, to $116.00 per parcel. Pursuant to Proposition 218, a majority of the affected property owners must approve the increase in fees pursuant to a mailed ballot election. If the proposed rate of $116.00 is rejected at the public hearing or pursuant to the results of the election, the Rancho Highlands Community Association will maintain the slope and charge the property owners through their monthly home owner association dues. However, the TCSD will continue to provide the current level of maintenance at the existing rate of $46.00 per parcel. Service Level "D" provides refuse, recycling and street sweeping services to all single family residential properties in the City of Temecula. The proposed rate of $162.78 will not increase from last year. The cost for this service would actually have been $168.48 in 1997/98. However, due to prudent administration of the franchise agreement, the City was able to save an additional $5.70 per single family residence, therefore, there will be no increase this year. Next year's rate, however, will be adjusted based on the $168.48 rate. Since the preparation of the Preliminary Levy Report, a reconciliation between the County tax rolls and CR&R's residential billing accounts has been completed. As a result, the Final Levy Report has been amended to include an additional 258 parcels within Service Level D. Public Hearing Notices were mailed to all affected property owners identifying the Service Level D rate and charge of $162.78. As of July 1, 1997, these parcels will be removed from CR&R's billing accounts and the charge for refuse and recycling services will be transferred to the property tax rolls. R; \¥aninol~k\rtnc~'gs.c~l 051397 Service Level "R" includes only those parcels which receive benefit from the emergency maintenance of certain unpaved roads that are washed out during rainstorms. Twenty-seven (27) parcels were removed from Rate Level 1 for FY 1997-98 as the result of the City's paving of the Walcott Corridor. The remaining ninety-three (93) parcels in Rate Level 1 will continue to receive these services. The two (2) rate levels for Service Level R will not increase from last year and are identified as follows: Residential Rate R-l: Vacant Rate R-l: 57.08 78.54 Residential Rate R-2: Vacant Rate R-2: $121.92 $ 60.96 The levy formula used to fund these services has not been changed from last fiscal year. Only those property owners who receive benefit from a particular service level pay for those services. In summary, the average single family residence receiving benefit from all service levels will receive no increases in the TCSD Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 1997-98. The levy and collection of the TCSD Rates and Charges is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 21080 (b)(8) of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the rates and charges are necessary to maintain existing services within the TCSD. FISCAL IMPACT: The total Levy Budget for Fiscal Year 1997-98 is $2,809,053. The revenue generated from the TCSD Rates and Charges will fund slope maintenance; residential street lighting; recycling and refuse collection services; and streets and road maintenance in the City of Temecula. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. CSD 97- adopting the TCSD Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 1997-98. Final Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 1997-1998. r: \yaa mobk\tc~ilevy.97 051397 RESOLUTION NO. CSD 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING, SLOPE MAINTENANCE, RECYCLING AND REFUSE COLLECTION AND STREET AND ROAD IMPROVEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Upon incorporation of the City o£Temecula, effective December 1, 1989, voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District ( "TC SD"), to provide specified services to properties within its jurisdiction. Section 2, Pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the TCSD has prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for the services furnished by it. and has elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, property taxes within the TCSD in the manner prescribed by Government Code Sections 61765.2 to 61765.6, inclusive. By previous resolution, the TCSD proposed to continue such rates and charges for the operation, maintenance, service and administration of residential street lighting, slope maintenance, recycling and refuse collection, and street and road improvements for Fiscal Year 1997-98. Section 3. Pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, the TCSD caused a written report ("Report") to be prepared and filed with the Secretary of the TCSD, which Report contains a description of each parcel of real property and the proposed amount of the rates and charges for Fiscal Year 1997/98. The Report is based upon the estimated costs for the proposed services for specific areas where such services are provided, including necessary staff and administrative expenses. Section 4. By previous resolution, the Board of Directors acknowledged the filing of the Report, and appointed a time and place for a public heating on the Report and the proposed rates and charges. Notice of the public hearing was mailed and published as required by law and affidavits of publication and mailing are on file with the Secretary of the TCSD. Section 5. On May 13, 1997, the Board of Directors conducted a public hearing on the Report and the proposed rates and charges. At the public hearing, the Board of Directors heard and considered all oral and written protests and comments by any interested person concerning the proposed rates and charges or the method of their collection. Section 6. The Board of Directors hereby finds that, based on the Report and the District budget, the rates and charges as set out on Exhibit "A" are the reasonable cos~ of the services to be provided by the TCSD for Fiscal Year 1997-98. Section 7. The Board of Directors hereby adopts the rates and charges for Fiscal Year 1997-98 as set out on Exhibit "A" for the services to be provided by the TCSD for Fiscal Year 1997-98. Section 8. The proposed Fiscal Year 1997-98 rates and charges shall become effective on July 1, 1997, except that the proposed increase in Service Level C rates and charges for the Rancho Highlands Development (Tract Nos. 20643, 20644, 22203, 22204, 22760, 22761, and 22762) shall become effective only upon approval by a majority vote of the property owners of the property subject to the increased rates and charges. In the event that the owners of properties within those tracts do not approve the increased rates and charges, those properties shall be subject to Fiscal Year 1997-98 Service Level C rates and charges at the same rate as those levied in Fiscal Year 1996-97. Section 9, The TCSD shall collect such rates and charges at the same time, in the same manner, by the same persons and together with and not separately from, the property taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shall be delinquent at the same time and thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes. All laws applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, are applicable to these rates and charges, except for California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831. However, if for the first year the charge is levied, the real property to which the charge relates has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien of a bona fide encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the first installment of such taxes appear on the roll, then the charge shall not result in a lien against the property, but instead shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection. Section 10. If a property owner subject to these rates and charges challenges or questions the levy of the rates and charges to such property owner's property, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing an appeal with the TCSD Secretary before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 1997, pursuant to procedures established by the TCSD. Section 11. Ira property owner subject to these rates and charges believes that payment of the rates and charges for Fiscal Year 1997-98 would create a hardship for that property owner during that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing a hardship appeal with the TCSD Secretary before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 1997, pursuant to procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the hardship appeal program. Section 12. The TCSD Secretary is hereby ordered to transmit or cause to be transmitted to the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, California before August 10, 1997, the property tax roll with such rates and charges enumerated for each parcel not exempt R:'\vaamobk\u:s~eso.97 051397 therefrom; and the County Auditor is hereby designated, required, empowered, authorized, instructed, directed and ordered to make collection of all such rates and charges as shown on that roll and to perform any and all duties necessary therefor. Section 13. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the levy and collection of these rates and charges is exempt from CEQA pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21080Co)(8) and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the rates and charges are necessary to maintain existing improvements within the TCSD. Section 14. The District Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District this 13th day of May, 1997. Jeffrey E. Stone, President ATTEST: June S. Greek, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 97- was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the regular meeting thereof, held on the 13th day of May, 1997, by the following vote of the Board of Directors. AYE S: DIRECTORS: NOES: DIRECTORS: ABSENT: DIRECTORS: R:\yasmobk\tcacke~o.97 051397 EXI-IJBIT A PROJECT SUMMARY TEMECUI~ COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT On July 1, 1996, Muni Financial, Inc. Was retained by the City of Temecula to prepare the Annual Levy Report for the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) for the Fiscal Year 199%98. Pursuant to the Community Services District Law, Division 3 of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 61000 et seq,, the TCSD has the power to levy and collect rates and charges in order to carry on its operations and to provide the services and facilities furnished by it. The levy and collection of the rates and charges is accomplished by the identification and description of each parcel within a specific service level. A Service Level is a defined area that provides a specific service, operation and maintenance and/or program to only those parcels contained within that service level. The TCSD is currently composed off our (4) service levels. The descriptions of the service levels are as follows: Service Level B - Residential Street Lights. Operations, maintenance utility costs and administration of all residential street lights. Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance. Operations, maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and administration for all perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD. Service Level D - Refuse Collection, Recycling and Street Sweeping. Operations and administration of the refuse and recycling program, and street sweeping services for all single-family residential homes. Service Level R - Streets and Roads. Construction, installation, and maintenance of streets and roads. R:\yasmobk\tasdreao.97 051397 The Financial Analysis comained herein includes each Service Level with their total levy budgets for Fiscal Year 1997-98 to be as follows: SERVICE Lg~VEL/LEVY BUDGET RATE LEVEL PA_RCEL CHARGE Service Level B $ 267,688.00 $ 25.68 Service Level C $ 528,896.00 C-1 $ 46.00 C-2 $ 89.OO C-3 $116.00 C-4 $175.00 Service Level D $1,996,334.00 $162.78 Service Level R $ 16,135.00 R-1 Improved $157.08 R-1 Unimproved $ 78.54 R-2 Improved $121.92 R-2 Unimproved $ 60.96 TOTAL TCSD LEVY: $2,809,053.00 R :\yasmobk\tcsdreso.97 051397 ANNUAL LEVY REPORT FOR THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD), FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 CITY OF TEMECULA FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 Final Report SUBMITTED: May 2, 1997 APPROVED: MuniFinancial Corporate Office 28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92590 Tel: (909) 699-3990 Fax: (909) 699-3460 San Francisco Bay Area Office One Donna Maria Way Orinda, CA 94563 Tel: (510) 376-1162 Fax: (510) 376-1162 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................... A. Introduction .................................................................................................1 B. Description of the District and Services ...................................................2 C. Budget and Levy Summary ........................................................................2 II. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT .........................................................................4 II!. CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT ...............................................................................7 A. Modifications of the District Structure ......................................................7 B. Inclusions ....................................................................................................8 IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS .............................................................................................9 V. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ...........................................................................12 APPENDIX A- 1997-98 COLLECTION ROLL ..........................................................14 I. OVERVIEW A. Introduction The Temecula Community Services District (District) was formed in 1989 upon incorporation of the City of Temecula (City), to continue services previously provided by the County of Riverside (County). The boundary of the District is coterminous with the City boundary, and includes all parcels within the City. The District collects property related fees and charges (Charges) in order to provide services and maintain the improvements within the District. The District was formed, and the Charges are set and established pursuant to Community Services District Law 61000, Section 61621, Title 6, Division 3 of the Califomia Govemment Code (the Code). The Annual Levy Report describes the District, any new inclusions, any changes to the District, and the proposed Charges for Fiscal Year 1997-98. The Charges are based on the historical and estimated cost to maintain the improvements that service properties within the District. The improvements and services within the District and the corresponding costs are budgeted and charged as separate Service Levels and include all expenditures, deficits, surpluses, and revenues. Each parcel is charged for the services necessary to maintain and operate the improvements. The word "parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessment Number by the Riverside County Assessor's Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Assessment Numbers and specific Fund Numbers, to identify on the tax roll, properties charged for District services. A Public Headng is held each year before the District Board of Directors (Board), to allow the public an opportunity to hear and be heard regarding the District. Following consideration of all public comments and written protests at the noticed Public Hearing, and review of the Final Engineer's Annual Levy Report, the Board may order amendments to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the Report, and confirmation of the Charges, the Board shall order the levy and collection of Charges for Fiscal Year 1997-98. In such case, the levy information will be submitted to the Riverside County AuditodController, and included as Charges on the property tax roll for the various services provided in Fiscal Year 1997-98. B. Description of the District and Services The District provides certain property related services and the maintenance of specific improvements within public right-of-ways and dedicated landscape easements throughout the City. The District consists of four (4) separate Service Levels, providing specific services and improvements to parcels within certain areas throughout the City. Each parcel within the District is charged proportionately for only those services and improvements applicable to the property. Each Service Level has differing costs depending upon the various services and improvements provided. All parcels identified within a Service Level, share in the cost of the services. The costs associated with the services, are proportionately spread among all properties within that Service Level to which the services are provided. The Service Levels are identified as follows: · Residential Street Lighting · Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes · Citywide Recycling and Refuse · Road Improvement and Maintenance Services and improvements provided through the District include: residential street lighting; perimeter landscape maintenance; slope protection; a recycling and refuse collection program; and road improvement construction and maintenance. C. Budget and Levy Summary Each Service Level provides different and specific services and improvements to various parcels within the community. Only the parcels that the services and improvements are provided for are included in each of the Service Levels. The "Total Levy Units" and the resulting "Charge Per Levy Unit" (shown in Table I), reflect a method of apportionment that most fairly proportions the costs of the services to the parcels in that Service Level. The "Total Levy Units" for Service Levels B, C, and D is based on a per parcel count. For Service Level R, levy units are based on a Parcel Development Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel count, but makes a distinction between developed and undeveloped parcels. For a more complete description of the methods used for calculating the "Total Levy Units" used for each Service Level, please refer to (Section V), Method of Apportionment. 2 r~ II. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT Service Level B, Residential Street Lighting --includes all developed single family residential parcels and residential vacant parcels within specific residential tracts requiring servicing, operation, and maintenance of local street lighting. Table II shows a listing of the tracts within Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting.) TABLE II Service Level B Tracts 11087-01 20079-02 20882-00 21674-02 22915-01 24131-03 11087-02 20079-03 20882-01 21674-03 22915-02 24132-00 12189-01 20130-00 20882-02 21675-00 22915-03 24132-01 12189-02 20130-01 20882-03 21675-01 22916-00 24133-00 12189-03 20130-02 20987-00 21675-02 22916-01 24133-01 12189-04 20130-03 21067-00 21675-03 22916-02 24133-02 12189-05 20130-04 21082-00 21675.04 22916-03 24133-03 12189-06 20130-05 21082-01 21675-05 22962-00 24133-04 12189-07 20130-06 21082-02 21675-06 23100-01 24133-05 13060-01 20153-00 21082-03 21760-00 23100-02 24134-00 13060-02 20154-00 21082-04 21765-00 23100-03 24134-01 13060-03 20319-00 21340-00 22148-00 23100-04 24134-02 13060-04 20643-00 21340-01 22203-00 23101-02 24134-03 13060-05 20644-00 21340-02 22204-00 23125-00 24135-00 13060-06 20703-01 21340-03 22208-00 23125-01 24135-01 13060-07 20703-02 21340-04 22593-00 23125-02 24135-02 13060-08 20703-03 21340-05 22593-01 23126-00 24135-03 18518-00 20735-01 21340-06 22593-02 23128-00 25004-01 18518-01 20735-02 21340-07 2271 5-00 23177-00 27827-00 18518-02 20735-03 21561-00 22715-01 23267-00 27827-01 18518-03 20735.04 21672-01 22715-02 23267-01 27827-02 18583-00 20735-05 21672-02 22716-00 23267-02 27827-03 19872-00 20735-06 21672-03 22716-01 23267-03 19872-01 20735-07 21672-04 22716-02 23267-04 19872-02 20735-08 21673-00 2271 6-03 23371-01 19939-00 20735-09 21673-01 22716-04 23371-02 19939-01 20848-00 21673-02 22761-00 23483-00 19939-02 20879-00 21673-03 22762-00 24131-00 20079-00 20879-01 21674-00 22786-00 24131-01 20079-01 20881-00 21674-01 22915-00 24131-02 4 Service Level C, Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes Nincludes servicing, operation, and maintenance of perimeter landscaped areas and slopes within the public right-of-ways and dedicated easements within certain tracts. The level of maintenance required within these tracts varies depending on operating costs, and therefore four (4) rate levels have been established within Service Level C. Table III shows a listing of the tracts in each of the four (4) rate levels within Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes.) TABLE III Service Level C Tracts Rate Level C-1 [ Rate Level C-2 Tract Name Tract # Tract Name Tract # P~E,SLEY DEVELOPMENT 23267-00 MORRI.~3N HOMES 22148-00 23267-01 m DGE'~EW 20735-07 23267-02 20735-08 23267-03 20735-09 23267-04 20881-00 26861-00 21764-00 26861-01 WNCHES"rER CREEK 2013000 26861-02 20130-01 26861-03 2013002 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 20643-00 20130-03 20644-00 20130-04 21760-00 20130-05 22203-O0 2013O-06 22204-00 21340-00 22761-00 21340-01 22762-00 21340-02 RANCHO SOLANA 22593-00 21340-03 22593-01 21340-04 22593-02 21340-.05 THE VlNEYARD~ 20879-00 21340-06 20879-01 21340-07 W<:X3OCRES'r COUNTRy 21561-00 22208-00 Rate Level C-3 Rate Level C-4 Tract Name Tract # Tract Name Tract # MARTINIQ4JE 23128-00 BARC~-Y ESTATES 25004-01 SADO..EW::3OD 18518-00 MEADOW V1EW 21765-00 18518-01 S~GNET SER~ES 20882-00 18518-02 20882-01 18518-03 20882-02 V1NTAGE HILLS 22715-00 20882-03 22715-01 TRAD~",NIN~ 23125-00 22715-02 23125-01 22716-00 23125-02 22716-01 23125-03 22716-02 VILLAGE GROVE 21672-01 22716-03 21672-02 2271 6-04 21672-03 2291500 21672-04 22915-01 21673-00 22915-02 21673-01 2291 6-03 21873-0 2 22916-00 21673-03 22916q31 21674-00 2,2.916--02 21674-01 22916-03 21674-02 21674-03 21675-OO 21675-01 21676-02 21675-O3 21675-04 21675-O5 21675-06 5 Service Level D, Citywide Recycling, Refuse and Street Sweeping --provides for the operation and administration of the refuse and recycling program and street sweeping services for all single family residential homes within the District. Service Level R, Roads Bprovides funding for construction, improvement, service and maintenance of public streets and roads throughout the City. The services provided may include, but are not limited to: renovation or restoration due to damage; flood and drainage control; repairs and re-grading; and upgrades of the existing areas as required for unpaved roads. All parcels identified within Service Level R, share in the cost of the services provided. The costs associated with the services, are proportionately spread among all parcels within various areas (rate levels) of the Service Level. Service Level R currently has two (2) rate levels. The level of maintenance required within these two (2) areas vary due to operating costs, and therefore separate rate levels have been established. Only the parcels within each of the two (2) boundary areas will be charged for the costs associated with servicing and maintaining the roads and streets in the area. Rate Level R-1 --The parcels within this rate level consists of ninety-three (93) assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides funding for servicing and maintenance of: Nicolas Road; Greenwood Lane; Liefer Road; Gatlin Road; Pala Vista. A total of 1.821 miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area. Rate Level R-2 BThe parcels within this rate level consists of fifty-seven (57) assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides funding for servicing and maintenance of: Ormsby Road; Santiago Road; Lolita Road; and John Warner Road. A total of 1.003 miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area. 6 I!!. CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT For Fiscal Year 1997-98, changes within the District that affect the levy are outlined below. A. Modifications of the District Structure Modifications to the District structure, if any, could include, but are not limited to: changes or expansion in the existing improvements or in the types of services provided; addition of new services or Service Levels; restructuring of the current Service Levels; inclusion of parcels into the District or Service Levels; or revisions in the method of apportionment. On March 4, 1997, the voters of Temecula approved a Special Tax to fund Citywide community services. This Special Tax replaced two existing Service Levels, previously charged through the Community Services District. · Community Services, Parks, and Recreation --that provided for the maintenance, service and operation of all public parks and recreation services within the City. Service Level A, Arterial Street Lighting and Medians --that provided servicing, operation, and maintenance of street lighting and landscaped median along arterial streets. Beginning Fiscal Year 1997-98, these two Service Levels will no longer be charged through the District. The number of parcels included in Service Level R, Roads (specifically Rate Level R-l) has been reduced from one hundred twenty parcels to ninety- three parcels for Fiscal Year 1997-98. Five of the streets previously serviced and maintained by the District (Calle Girasol; Aussie Road; Calle Chapos; Walcott Road; and Tommy Lane) have been upgraded to paved roads. The parcels that were previously serviced by the maintenance of these streets have been removed from Service Level R. The only other modifications to the District are related to the addition of improvements and expansion of existing services as a result of new development. VVhen a new residential tract is developed, the District accepts additional improvements for maintenance and servicing. Along with acceptance of the improvements, the parcels within those tracts that are being serviced are included into the appropriate Service Levels, and includes the addition of new single family residential units to Service Level D (Citywide Recycling, Refuse and Street Sweeping). 7 B. Inclusions The inclusion of specific tracts and the parcels within those tracts to Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting), and Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes), for Fiscal Year 1997-98 are described in the following. Inclusions to Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting), include 426 parcels within Tracts: Tract Number of Tract Number of Number Parcels Number Parcels 23100-04 24 24131-00 127 23371-01 25 24131-03 90 23371-02 38 24133-05 122 Inclusions to Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes), include 234 parcels within the following tracts: Rate level #1 -- Tracts: 22761-00 (Rancho Highlands -- 80 parcels); 26861-00 (Presley Development -- 37 parcels); 26861-03 (Presley Development -- 41 parcels). · Rate level #2 ~ No New Tracts. · Rate level # 3 -- No New Tracts. · Rate level # 4 -- Tract: 23125-03 (Tradewinds -- 76 parcels). Inclusions to Service Level D (Citywide Recycling and Street Sweeping): A total of 1,042 parcels have been added to Service Level D for the 1997-98 Fiscal Year. This is an increase of 258 parcels over the number of parcels shown in the preliminary report. These parcels were added based on the waste hauler's updated service records of single family residential homes. All parcels identified in this report were noticed for the 1997-98 Service Level D charges. 8 IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS Table IV on the next three (3) pages show the District budget for Fiscal Year 1997-98. TABLE IV 1997-98 DISTRICT BUDGET Temecula Community Services District Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 1998 BUDGET ITEM No. 192 193 194 195 PERSONNEL SERVICES Salades and Wages 5100 $7.22.6 $90.212 $43,168 $0 $140,606 Defen'ed Compensation 5101 0 0 0 0 0 PERS Retirement 5102 0 0 0 0 0 State Uneml~loyment 5103 0 0 0 0 0 Meclicare FICA 5104 0 0 0 0 0 Auto Allowance 5106 0 0 0 0 0 Unem131oyment Training Tax 5109 0 0 0 0 0 D~sabitity Insurance 5110 0 0 0 0 0 Workers Compensation 5112 0 0 0 0 0 Health Insurance 5113 0 0 0 0 0 Tempora~ Help 5118 0 0 0 0 0 Pa rt-Time (Project) 5119 0 8.203 0 0 8.2{33 Overtime Wages 5121 0 500 0 0 500 Subtotal (Personnel Sem'~ces) $7,226 $98.915 $43.168 $0 $149.309 9 TABLE IV 1997-98 DISTRICT BUDGET Temecula Community Services District Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 1998 BUDGET ITEM No. 192 193 194 195 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Telephone Serwce (Cellular) 5208 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Repair & Maint. - Facilities 5212 0 49,500 0 0 49,500 Repair & Maintenance-VehicJes 5214 0 0 0 0 0 Repair & Maint.-Office Equipment 5217 0 0 0 0 0 Maintenance Supplies 5218 0 0 0 0 0 Office Supplies 5220 0 0 0 0 0 Pnnting 5222 0 0 0 0 0 Legal Documents/Maps 5224 0 0 0 0 0 Dues and MemDerships 5226 0 0 0 0 0 Publications 5228 0 0 0 0 0 Postage and Packaging 5230 0 0 0 0 0 Properly Tax Adman Fees 5231 1,500 850 1,800 75 4,225 Rent - Facilities 5234 0 0 0 0 0 Rent - EQuipment 5238 0 0 0 0 0 EQuipment Lease 5239 0 0 0 0 0 Utilities 5240 0 128,500 0 0 128,500 Small tools/EQuipment 5242 0 0 0 0 0 Unifon'ns 5243 0 0 0 0 0 Signs 5244 0 0 0 0 0 Legal Services 5246 0 0 0 0 0 Consulting Services 5248 0 5,000 0 0 5.000 Other Outside Services 5250 0 0 0 0 0 Advertising 5254 0 0 1,500 0 1,500 Public Notices 5256 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 12.000 Conferences 5258 0 0 0 0 0 Professional Meetings 5260 0 0 0 0 0 Staff Tra~nmg/Educabon 5261 0 0 0 0 0 Mileage 5262 0 0 0 0 0 Fuel Expense-City VehicJes 5263 0 0 0 0 0 Councfi Disctet~onan/ 5267 0 0 0 0 0 Bluepnnts 5268 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal (5200's) $4,500 $186.850 $6.300 $3,075 $200,725 10 TABLE IV 1997-98 DISTRICT BUDGET Temecula Community Services District Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 1998 No. '192 193 194 195 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Recreation Sulkplies 5301 S0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Waste Hauling 5315 0 0 2.064.768 0 2.064,768 Street Lighting 5319 291,800 0 0 0 291,800 Insurance 5330 0 0 0 0 0 Vehictes 5335 0 0 0 0 0 Information Systems 5340 4,470 16,765 6,706 0 27,941 Supl~ort Services 5345 0 0 0 0 0 Facilities 5350 0 0 0 0 0 Assessment Engineenng 5370 0 0 0 0 0 Refund of Pnor Year Assessments 5375 0 0 0 0 0 City Acimin Charges 5380 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotals (5300's) $296,270 $16,765 $2,071,474 · $0 $2,384,509 Operating Expenses 5400 0 0 0 0 0 Emergencey Road Maintenance 5402 0 0 0 16.135 16.135 Landscape Maintenance 5415 0 268.720 0 0 268,720 Lanosca13e Rehabilitation 5416 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotals (5400's) $0 $268,720 $0 $16,135 $284,855 TOTAL DISTRICT COSTS $307,996 $571,250 $2,120,942 $19,210 $3.019,398 EXPENDITURES RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCY 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL DISTRICT COSTS 307,996 571.250 2,120,942 19,210 3,019,398 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $307,996 $571,250 $2.120,942 $19,210 $3.019.398 REVENUES OTHER REVENUE SOURCES 21,363 17.000 56.174 3,075 97,612 FUND BALANCE 18,945 25,354 68,434 0 112,733 BALANCE TO LEVY 267,688 528,896 1,996,334 16,135 2,809,063 TOTAL REVENUES $307,996 $571,250 $2,120.942 $19.210 $3.019.398 11 V. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT As in past years, the cost to provide services within the District will be fairly distributed among each assessable property. The following is the formula used to calculate each properry's District charges by the per parcel method. Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting); Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes); and Service Level D (Citywide Recycling and Refuse): Total Balance to Levy/Total Parcels (in Service Level) = Parcel Charge The Rate Per Levy Unit for Service Level R is based on a Parcel Development Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel charge, but makes a distinction between developed and undeveloped parcels. Service Level R (Roads): Parcel Development Units = 1.0 for Developed Parcels Parcel Development Units = 0.5 for Undeveloped Parcels Total Balance to Levy/Total Parcel PDU (in rate Level) = Parcel Charge 12 Table V reflects the levy calculations for each Service Level. TABLE V PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL B Property Type Single Family Residential Single Family Vacant Parcel Charge per I Parcel Unit X Parcel = Charge 1.00 $25.68 $25.68 1.00 $25.68 $25.68 Multiplier Per Parcel Per Parcel PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL C Property Type Single Family Residential Rate C-1 Single Family Residential Rate C-2 Single Family Residential Rate C-3 Single Family Residential Rate C-4 Parcel I Charge per I Parcel Unit X Parcel Charge 1.00 $46.00 $46.00 1.00 89.00 89.00 1.00 116.00 116.00 1.00 $175.00 $175.00 Multiplier Per Parcel Per Parcel Per Parcel Per Parcel PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL D Property Type Single Family Residential Parcel I Charge per Unit X Parcel 1.001 162.78 $162.781 Per Parcel I PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL R Property Type Single Family Residential Rate R-1 Single Family Vacant Rate R-1 Single Family Residential Rate R-2 Single Family Vacant Rate R-2 Parcel XlchargeperI Parcel Unit Unit = Charge 1.00 $157.08 $157.08 0.50 157.08 78.54 1.00 121.92 121.92 0.50 $121.92 $60.96 I Multiplier Per Parcel Per Parcel Per Parcel Per Parcel 13 Appendix A- 1997-98 COLLECTION ROLL Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the County Assessor's map for the year in which this report is prepared. A listing of parcels within this District, along with the charges, has been submitted to the City Clerk and, by reference, is made part of this report. 14 APPROV~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FInIAlS CITY MANAGER ~/~. CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: May 13, 1997 SUBJECT: Proposed Landscape Maintenance Fee for Rancho Highlands - Election and Ballot Procedure PREPARED BY: ~ ~l~"Beryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ORDERING, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON JUNE 30, 1997 FOR PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN THE RANCHO HIGHLANDS DEVELOPMENT TO APPROVE AN INCREASE IN SERVICE LEVEL C RATES AND CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XlIID, SECTION 6 OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION Approve the Election Notice, Ballot, and Procedures for the Completion, Return and Tabulation of the Ballots. Authorize staff to mail the ballots to the affected property owners pursuant to the aforementioned process. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to the request of the Rancho Highlands Community Association, staff has initiated proceedings to assume maintenance of an additional 3.98 acres of perimeter slope and parkway landscaping located along Ynez Road beginning in FY 1997-98. The subject area was recently improved in accordance with TCSD standards by Terra Nova Construction and is the only remaining perimeter slope within the Rancho Highlands Development that is not currently maintained through the TCSD. Comprised of 408 residential parcels, the existing rate and charge for slope maintenance in Rancho Highlands is $46.00 per lot (Rate Level 1). However, the inclusion of the additional slope will necessitate an increase in the rate and charge to $116.00 per lot (Rate Level 3). Pursuant to R: \y~inobk~le~:~on.97 051397 Proposition 218, the proposed increase in the rate and charge must be approved by a majority of the affected property owners. On March 25, 1997, the Board of Directors adopted the resolution of intention to file the levy report identifying the 408 parcels affected by the proposed fee. The Notice of Public Hearing was subsequently mailed to all respective property owners, in accordance with the 45-day noticing requirements of Proposition 218. At tonight's Public Hearing, the Board of Directors must hear and consider all objections or protests to the levy report for Rancho Highlands and the proposed increase in the slope maintenance rate and charge. If written protests are presented by a majority of the affected property owners, the Board must reject the proposed fee and abandon any further proceedings. In this instance, the Rancho Highlands Community Association would assume maintenance of the slope. However, if the written protests against the proposed increase have been presented by less than a majority of owners of the parcels on which the proposed fee is to be imposed, the Board of Directors may then adopt the increased fee subject to an election requiring a majority approval of the affected property owners. In this instance, the Board of Directors can order and call an election for June 30, 1997 and authorize staff to proceed with mailing a notice and ballot to each affected property owner within the Rancho Highlands Development, a copy of which is attached for your review. Pursuant to the ballot process, staff is also recommending the approval of the attached Procedures for the Completion, Return and Tabulation of Ballots. The ballot procedure explains the process for completion, return and tabulation of the ballots and will be included as part of the mailed ballot documents. The ballot can only be completed by the property owner and only one ballot can be completed for each parcel. In order to be counted, the ballots must be completed for each parcel. In order to be counted, the ballots must be completed in compliance with these procedures and returned to the City Clerk/District Secretary prior to 5:00 p.m. on June 30, 1997. The ballots will be tabulated by the City Clerk/District Secretary on July 1, 1997 at 2:30 p.m. in the Main Conference Room in City Hall. The results of the election shall be announced by the City Clerk/District Secretary at the Community Services District meeting on July 8, 1997. FISCAL IMPACT: In the event that the Board of Directors calls for an election, staff will prepare the notices, ballot and election procedures in-house. The cost of mailing the public notices and ballot information is estimated at approximately $812.00. The proposed revenue generated through Service Level "C" will provide for the long-term maintenance and repairs of all perimeter slope and landscaped areas surrounding the Rancho Highlands at $116.00 (Rate Level 3) per parcel for FY 1997-98 is $47,328.00. If the proposed rate and charge for TCSD landscape maintenance services is rejected at the public hearing or pursuant to the results of the election, the Rancho Highlands Community Association would be obligated to maintain the new slope and charge the costs back to the property owners through their monthly home owners association dues. However, the TCSD would continue to provide the current level of maintenance at the Rancho Highlands Development through Service Level "C" and the collection of $46.00 per parcel on the annual property tax bills. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Calling and Noticing the Election. Notice and Ballot Form. Procedures for Completion, Return and Tabulation of Ballots. R: \¥uflnobk\ciect~on.97 051397 RESOLUTION NO. CSD 97- A RESOLUTION OF TIlE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ORDERING, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON JUNE 30, 1997 FOR PROPERTY OWNERS WTI3:IIN ~ RANCHO HIGHI JANDS DEVELOPMENT TO APPROVE AN INCREASE IN SERVICE LEVEL C RATES AND CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIHD, SECTION 6 OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION TRE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Pursuant to the requirements of Article XIIID, Section 6 of the California Constitution, there is hereby called and ordered to be held on June 30, 1997 an election for the purpose of obtaining approval by property owners within Tract Nos. 20643, 20644, 22203, 22204, 22760, 22761, and 22762 in the City of Temecula of an increase in Service Level C rates and charges for fiscal year 1997-98. Section 2. The notice and ballot to be submitted to the property owners shall be substantially in the form attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3. The Board of Directors hereby approves the Procedures for the Completion, Return and Tabulation of Ballots ("Ballot Procedures") presented to the Board at this meeting and directs such procedures be placed on file in the office of the Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District and open to publi'c inspection. Section 3. All ballots must be received by the Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District no later than 5 p.m. on June 30, 1997. In all particulars not recited in this Resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided in the Ballot Procedures. Section 4. The Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District is hereby authorized to canvass the returns of the election. The officers and staff of the Temecula Community Services District are hereby authorized and directed to take such further action as may be necessary or appropriate in preparing for and conducting the election. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District this 13th day of May, 1997. Jeffrey E. Stone, President ATTEST: June S. Greek, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 97- was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the regular meeting thereof, held on the 13th day of May, 1997, by the following vote of the Board of Directors. AYES: DIRECTORS: NOES: DIRECTORS: AB SENT: DIRECTORS: r:\yasmobk ~l¢ctton_ r~s 051397 EXHIBIT "A" OFFICIAL BALLOT TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT INCREASED SERVICE LEVEL C RATES AND CHARGES YES, I approve of the proposed increase in the annual levy of Service Level C rates and charges from $46.00 to $116.00 on the parcel identified on this ballot. NO, I do not approve of the proposed increase in the annual levy of Service Level C rates and charges from $46.00 to $116.00 on the parcel identified on this ballot. I hereby declare, under penalty of perjury, that I am the record owner, or the authorized representative of the record owner, of the parcel identified above. Signature Date Print Name CHECK ONLY ONE BOX. BALLOTS MUST BE COMPLETED IN INK AND RETURNED TO THE CITY CLERK/DISTRICT SECRETARY CITY OF TEMECULA, P.O. BOX 9033, 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92589-9033 NOTICE OF ELECTION PROPOSED INCREASE IN SERVICE LEVEL C RATES AND CHARGES RANCHO HIGHLANDS DEVELOPMENT FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 Pursuant to the request of the Rancho Highlands Community Association, the Temecula Community Services District has initiated proceedings to assume maintenance of an additional 3.98 acres of perimeter slope and parkway landscaping located along Ynez Road, beginning with the Fiscal Year 1997/98. Pursuant to this request, and pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, the TCSD caused a written report ("Report") to be prepared and filed with the Secretary of the TCSD, which contains a description of each parcel of property to be charged for this maintenance and the proposed amount of the maintenance charge for each parcel for Fiscal Year 1997-98. The proposed Service Level C rate and charge against your parcel for Fiscal Year 1997- 98 is $116.00, which is an increase of $70.00 from the $46.00 amount levied for Fiscal Year 1996-97. This amount was calculated by dividing the total estimated maintenance cost for Fiscal Year 1997-98 ($47,328) by the total number of parcels in your subdivision. The revenue from the Service Level C rates and charges will be used to maintain perimeter slope and parkway landscaping within your subdivision, including the additional landscaping along Ynez Road. On May 13, 1997, the Board of Directors conducted a public hearing on the Report and the proposed increase in Service Level C rates and charges. At the public hearing, the Board of Directors heard and considered all objections or protests to the Report and to the proposed increase. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board determined that written protests against the proposed increase were presented by less than a majority of owners of the parcels on which the proposed increase is to be imposed, and levied the increased rates and charges subject to approval by the property owners subject to the proposed increase. The Board of Directors encourages you to return the enclosed ballot indicating whether you support or oppose the proposed increase in Service Level C rates and charges. Ballots may be mailed to the City Clerk/District Secretary at P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, California, 92589-9033, or otherwise delivered to the City Clerk/District Secretary at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, 92590 no later than 5:00 p.m. on June 30, 1997. The increase in Service Level C rates and charges will be abandoned if ballots submitted in favor of the rate and charge do not exceed the ballots submitted in opposition to the rate and charge. In the event the increase is abandoned, the Rancho Highlands Community Association will be responsible for maintaining perimeter slope and parkway landscaping located along Ynez Road. Enclosed is your ballot and the District's Procedures for the completion, return and tabulation of Ballots. Please consult these Procedures for details regarding the ballot process. You may also contact the City Clerk/District Secretary's Office at (909) 694-6444; by mail, at P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, California, 92589-9033; or in person, at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590, for further information regarding this matter. TEMECUI~ COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT PROCEDURES FOR THE COMPLETION, RETURN, AND TABUI~TION OF BAIJ.OTS I. Completion of Ba!lots Who may complete a ballot A ballot may be completed by the owner of the parcel to be charged. As used in these Procedures, the term "owner" includes the owner's authorized representative. If the owner of the parcel is a partnership, joint tenancy, or tenancy in common, a ballot may be completed by any of the general partners, joint tenants, or tenants in common. Only one ballot may be completed for each parcel. · Duplicate ballots If a ballot is lost, destroyed or never received, the City Clerk/District Secretary will provide a duplicate ballot to the owner upon receipt of a request in writing to the City Clerk, at P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, California, 92589-9033, or otherwise delivered to the City Clerk/District Secretary at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. The duplicate ballot will be marked to show the date on which the ballot was provided and to identify it as a duplicate ballot. · Marking and signing the ballot To complete a ballot, the owner of the parcel must (1) mark the appropriate box supporting or opposing the proposed rate and charge, and (2) sign, under penalty of perjury, the statement on the ballot that the person completing the ballot is the owner of the parcel or the owner's authorized representative. Only one box may be marked on each ballot. Ballots must be completed in ink. Only ballots provided by the District will be accepted The District will only accept ballots mailed or otherwise provided to owners by the District. Photocopies, faxes, and other forms of the ballot will not be accepted. H. Return of Ballots · Who may return ballots A ballot may be returned by the owner of the parcel or by anyone authorized by the owner to return the ballot. · Where to return ballots Ballots may be mailed to the City Clerk/District Secretary's Office, at P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, Califomia, 92589-9033, (the District has provided a return postage-paid envelope). Ballots may also be delivered in person to the City Clerk/District Secretary's Office at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. Ballots may not be returned by fax. · When to return ballots All returned ballots must be received by the City Clerk/District Secretary's Office prior to 5 p.m. on June 30, 1997. The City Clerk/District Secretary will stamp on each ballot the date of its receipt. · Withdrawal of ballots After returning a ballot to the District, the person who signed the ballot may Withdraw the ballot by submitting a written request in person to the City Clerk/District Secretary at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. Such request must be received by the City Clerk/District Secretary. prior to 5 p.m. on June 30, 1997. If any ballot has been withdrawn, the person withdrawing the ballot may request a duplicate ballot. The City Clerk/District Secretary will retain all withdrawn ballots and will indicate on the face of such ballots that they have been withdrawn. m. Tabulation of Ballots · Which ballots will be counted Only ballots which are completed and returned in compliance with these procedures will be counted. Ballots received by the City Clerk/District Secretary after 5 p.m. on June 30, 1997 will not be counted. Ballots which are not signed by the owner will not be counted. Ballots with no boxes marked, or with more than one box marked, will not be counted. Ballots withdrawn in accordance with these procedures Will not be counted. The City Clerk/District Secretary will keep a record of each duplicate ballot provided to an owner and will verify, prior to counting any duplicate ballot, that only one ballot has been returned for the parcel. If a non-duplicate ballot has been returned, the District will count the non-duplicate ballot and disregard all duplicate ballots. If only duplicate ballots have been returned, the District will count the earliest provided duplicate ballot and disregard the later provided duplicate ballots. · How ballots will be tabulated Ballots may be counted by hand, by computer or by any other tabulating device. · Who will tabulate ballots Ballots will be tabulated by the City Clerk/District Secretary. When and where will the ballots be tabulated Ballots will be opened and tabulated on Tuesday, July 1, 1997, at 2:30 p.m. in the Main Conference Room at City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, 92590. This process is open to the general public. Results of tabulation The results of the tabulation will be announced following the completion of the tabulation and entered in the minutes of the next Board of Directors meeting. IV. Resolution of Disputes In the event of a dispute regarding whether the signer of a ballot is the owner of the parcel to which the ballot applies, the District will make such determination from the last equalized assessment roll and any evidence of ownership submitted to the City Clerk/District Secretary. The District will be under no duty to obtain or consider any other evidence as to ownership of property and the District's determination of ownership will be final and conclusive. In the event of a dispute regarding whether the signer of a ballot is an authorized representative of the owner of the parcel, the District may rely on the statement on the ballot, signed under penalty of perjury, that the person completing the ballot is the owner's authorized representative and any evidence submitted to the City Clerk/District Secretary. The District will be under no duty to obtain or consider any other evidence as to whether the signer of the ballot is an authorized representative of the owner and the District's determination will be final and conclusive. V. General Information For further information, contact the City Clerk/District Secretary at (909) 694-6444; by mail, at P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, California, 92589-9033; or in person, at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. APPROVAT, CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINA~C CITY MANAGER ~~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Board of Directors Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager May 13, 1997 Appeal of 1996-97 TCSD Rates and Charges: Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course RECOMMENDATION: That the Board adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DENYING THE APPEAL BY REGENCY PROPERTIES OF FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 RATES AND CHARGES LEVIED AGAINST THE TEMECULA CREEK INN BACKGROUND: On June 11, 1996, the Board adopted rates and charges for community services, parks and recreation, street lighting, slope maintenance, recycling and refuse collection services and street and road improvements for fiscal year 1996-1997. Different amounts were charged for different service levels within the District. The amount levied for the community services, parks and recreation service level was $69.24 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). The amount levied for arterial street lighting and medians (Service Level A) was $5.20 per EDU. Each parcel within the District was assigned a number of EDU's based on the use of the property. Five categories of land uses were established: single-family residential (which was assigned 1 EDU per dwelling unit), multi-family residential (0.75 EDU per dwelling unit), single-family vacant (2 EDU's per acre), non-residential vacant (4 EDU's per acre), and non- residential improved (6 EDU's per acre). Under this methodology, the Temecula Creek Inn was to be assigned 6 EDU's per acre, based on the fact that it is non-residential improved property. Because Staff recognized that 9705~ 1108(>-00007 syc 11017fi6 0 I golf courses provide recreational benefits that are available to the public, it was determined that they be levied a rate of 2 EDU's per acre, one-third of the rate levied against other improved non-residential properties (see May 20, 1996 letter from Beryl Yasinosky to Paul Reed). On November 27, 1996, Mr. Paul Reed, representing the company managing the Temecula Creek Inn, filed an appeal of the rates and charges levied on the Temecula Creek Inn property for fiscal year 1996-97 (see November 27, 1996 letter from Paul Reed to Ron Bradley). This appeal was granted in part, and rejected in part, by the General Manager on April 9, 1997 {see April 9, 1997 letter from Ron Bradley to Paul Reed). The General Manager granted a reduction based on information provided by Mr. Reed and confirmed by Staff that 22.7 acres of the subject property is undevelopable due to slope and flood plain restrictions. The General Manager rejected Mr. Reed's argument that the 2 EDU per acre rate was inappropriate for the remainder of the property. On April 18, 1997, Mr. Reed appealed this decision to the Board Isee April 18, 1997 letter from Paul Reed to TCSD Board). He did not appeal that portion of the General Manager's determination granting a reduction in the rates and charges. DISCUSSION: The appellant, Mr. Reed, bases his appeal on three grounds. First, he asserts that the 1996-97 TCSD charges for arterial street lighting and medians and community services, parks and recreation services constitute a special tax subject to the voter approval requirements of Article XIIIA, Section 4 of the California Constitution. In his November 27, 1996 letter, the appellant challenges the fees as being levied for "general governmental services and programs benefitting the community in general." The District's legal counsel has advised Staff that, prior to the enactment of Proposition 218, the TCSD was authorized to levy rates and charges for various District services without first obtaining voter approval. Proposition 218 provided that the TCSD could not continue to levy rates and charges for general governmental services provided by the TCSD after July 1, 1997. Proposition 218 does not affect the levy of charges against the subject property for the 1996-97 fiscal year. Second, the appellant asserts that there is no rational relationship between the charges that have been levied on the subject property and the level of benefit enjoyed by or provided to the subject property. He claims in his November 27, 1996 letter that the District "erroneously assumes that there is some relationship between the services provided by such expenditures and a parcel's land use designation and density of use." The General Manager, in his April 9, 1997 determination, explained Staff's purpose in distinguishing between residential and non-residential uses and between larger and smaller non-residential uses: "Non-residential uses are more appropriately charged on a per- acre basis than on a per-parcel basis, given the disparity in size between non-residential properties and the corresponding disparity in the number of customers and employees using those 970504 11086-00007 syc 1101766 0 ' ~ - properties and using the services and facilities provided to those properties by the Temecula Community Services District." Staff continues to believe that a commercial use such as the one conducted on the subject property is a more intense use than a single-family residence, and therefore receives a greater benefit from the arterial lighting and other programs and facilities provided by the TCSD. Staff has already reduced the amount of the rates and charges against the subject property to one- third the amount of other non-residential uses of the same size, to compensate for differences between recreational uses and other non-residential uses. Third, the appellant protests the increase in the levy on the subject property from 0.~ EDU's per acre in fiscal year 1995-96 to 2 EDU's per acre in fiscal year 1996-97 without any change in the land use of the subject property and without any increase in the level of service provided to the subject property. The 0.5 EDU per acre levied against the subject property in fiscal year 1995-96 was based on the fact that the property was classified as "agricultural" for that year. As noted in its May 20, 1996 letter, staff determined in early 1996 that agricultural land uses no longer existed within the City. Therefore, the "agricultural" category was eliminated as a classification for fiscal year 1996-97. The subject property, which had previously been erroneously classified as "agricultural," was reclassified as non-residential. This change in classification constituted a correction in the rate and charge applied to the subject property, not an increase. According to the appeal procedures adopted by the Board, the Board must consider the following factors when determining whether to grant an appeal: (1) whether the property in whole or in part is used for the purpose intended for that classification, (2) whether the classification adequately reflects the service received, (3) whether the rate or charge levied on vacant property exceeds the rate or charge if the property were developed to its highest and best use, and (4) whether unique or special circumstances of that property, or land use regulations affecting it, support a modification of the classification. Based on the above discussion, Staff believes that the subject property is being used for non-residential purposes, that the classification adequately reflects the service received by the subject property, and that Staff has sufficiently reduced the rates and charges against the subject property to account for unique and special circumstances of the property. Therefore, Staff recommends that the Board deny the appeal. FISCAL IMPACT: A reduction in the amount of the 1996-97 rates and charges against the subject property from 2 EDU's per acre to 0.5 EDU's per acre, as requested by the appellant, will result in a loss of $30,744.46 to the District. Attachments: B. C. D. E. Resolution No. CSD 97- May 20, 1996 letter from Beryl Yasinosky to Paul Reed November 27, 1996 letter from Paul Reed to Ron Bradley April 9, 1997 letter from Ron Bradley to Paul Reed April 18, 1997 letter from Paul Reed to TCSD Board 9'7050411085-0000'7syc 11017660 - ~ - RESOLIYTION NO. CSD 97- A REqOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ~ TF_dV[ECLrLA COMMLrNrYY SERVICES DISTRICT DENYING THE APPEAL BY REGENCY PROPERTIES OF FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 RATES AND CHARGES LEVI'I~.I~ AGAINST THE ~ CREEK INN THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ~ TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT FI'F. RF. Ry FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETI~MINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: ~qection 1. On lune 11, 1996, the Temecula Community Services District Board of Directors (Board) adopted its Resolution No. 96-04, adopting rates and charges against properties within the DisWict to pay for community services, parks and recreation, and arterial street hghting and medians, residential street lighting, local landscaping and slopes, citywide recycling and refuse collection, and roads for fiscal year 1996-97. gection ~.. On November 27, 1996, Mr. Paul Reed fried an appeal of the rates and charges levied against the Temecula Creek Inn, known as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 922-220-002, 922-220- 004, 922-220-007, 922-222-008, 922-230-002, 922-230-(}03, 922-230-004, 922-230-007, and 922-230-(X)8 (Property) for fiscal year 1996-97, on behalf of Regency Properties, the owner of the Property. ~qection 3. On April 9, 1997, the General Manager of the Temecula Community Services District granted a reduction in the rates and charges levied against the Property for fiscal year 1996-97 based on information provided to Staff that 22.7 acres of the Property is undevelopable due to slope and flood plain restrictions. The General Manager rejected that portion of the appeal challenging the classification of the Property. Section 4. On April 18, 1997, the decision of the General Manager was appealed to the Board, except for that portion of the decision granting a reduction in the rates and charges. ~qection 5. The Board considered the appeal on May 13, 1997, at which time the owner of the Property and its representatives had an opportunity to testify on behalf of the appeal. ~ection 6. Based on the testimony, staff report, and other information presented to the Board, the Board hereby finds that: A. The Property, in whole or in part, is being used for a non-residential purpose, which is the purpose intended for its classification; 136cad I B. The Property, and its employees, clients, customers and visitors, receive arterial street lighting and median services, community services, and parks and recreation services from the Temecula Community Services District, and the Properry's classification adequately reflects the service received; C. The rates and charges levied on the Property adequately reflect the rates and charges applicable to the Property if it were developed to its highest and best use; and D. There are no unique or special circumstances of the Property, or land use regulations affecting the Property, that support a further modification of the classification of the Property. gection 7. The Board hereby deaies the appeal of the rates and charges levied against the Property for fiscal year 1996-97. Section 8. The Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District is hereby authorized and directed to give notice of the Boaxd's decision in writing to the owner of the Property within 15 days after the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District this 13th day of May, 1997. ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, President June S. Greek, CMC/AA.E District Secretary/City Clerk City Clerk [SEAL] 136¢M 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Jun: S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 97- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 13th day of May, 1997 by the following roll call vote: COUNC~ERS: NOES: COUNCILl%~.MBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE District Secretary/City Clerk 136~sd 3 Cit of Temecula 4.3174 Bu.,~ne.,~ Park Dnve * Temecula. California 92590 J909) ~9~195~ - FAX [909) 694-1999 May 20, 1996 Mr. Paul L. Reed Executive Vice President KS C Management, Inc. 533 Coast Boulevard South La Jol.h, CA 92037 Subject: Proposed Temecul~ Community Services District (TCSD) P,~tes and Cha.rges for Golf Courses - Fisc~I Year 1996-97 Dear Mr. Keed: I would IKke to take this opportunity to respond to your letter addressed to City Manager Ron Bradley r%~ardi~g the apportionment of the TCSD Rates and Charges for golf courses within the City. of Temecuta.. The base unk of the TCSD Rates and Charges is equal to the Equivalent Dwelling Unit (HDU) of one (1). For Fiscal Year 1996-97, the proposed rate per EDU for Community Services, Parks and Recreation is $69.2,*, and $5.20 per EDU for Service Level A. This factor is applied to all single family dwemng units and serves as the basis of the rate applied to the other hand use desigu~ous. The charge is applied to vacant residentis! property at two (2) EDU's per acre; vacant, non-residential property at four (4) EDU's per acre; and improved, non-residential property at six (6) EDU's per acre. Upon incorporation of the City in 1989, the TCSD levy was prepared relative to the County's land use desi~mions. However, the County's land use designatio .ns and zoning ordinances were proved to be outdated and, in many cases, 'maccurate. On January 25, 1996, the City adopted its own Development Code and corresponding Zoning Map. As a zestfit, the TCSD had t~ update the levy roll for cousistenc7 with the City's land use designations. lhzrsuant to the results of a parcel audit, it was determined that a~wiculUttaI land uses no longer exist within the City timits. Therefore, those parceh that were previously identified in the TCSD levy as a~iculuzzal property were reviewed for current use and zoning. The Temecula Creek Golf Course is oue of the properties previously identified as a~'icukural property, which had been levied at the agricukural rate of .5 EDU per acre. Pursuant to Section 17.14.020 of the Development Code, golf c~u~es are des~ as an outdoor cor~merci~l recrealional use, reqniring an ~plicahon for a condition:~l use permit in order m operate. Golf course property is improved for commerci~l use and is not cl~s~ed as a=,,ricultu~ property. Accord/rig to the TCSD rate applications ident~ed above, all developed golf course Pacilities should be levied at six (6') EDU's per acre. W]~le the TCSD cannot ignore the f-act thnr the golf course improvements are ur~liTed for commercial purposes, the TCSD also ~cogniTes the associamd recr~ional benefits thnt ~-~ aw~n,hle to the public. Therefore, rsther than levy the golf courses as commercial propen'y, at six (6) EDU's per acre, the TCSD is proposing to levy the golf courses at the ram of two (2) EDU"s per acre, or $138.48 per acre for Community Sevices, Parks and R~r~tion, and $10.o~0 per ac~e for Service Level A (arterial street lighting). In ~ddi:ion, the application of two (2) EDU's per ~ for ~olf courses is consistent with th~ r~e cha~ed to the Temeku Golf Course. I hope thst this informabort helps to cla_Hf7 your concerns. If you desire to ~e an append of the l~tes and Cha~es, an ~ppe.~l form must be obr,~ed from the TCSD and completed prior to December 2, 199~. If you have any further questions, please contact me st (909) 69~-6480. Sincerely, CITY OF TE'v~C!~'LA Development Services Analyst CC: Ronald Bradley, City Shawn Nelson, Director of Community Services November 27, 1996 Temecula Community Services District P.O. Box 9033 Tem~ula, California 92589-9033 Attention: Mr. Ronald Bradley, City Manager, City of Temecula Re: TCSD Rates and Charges/Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course D~r Mr. Bradley: We are writing to submit a claim under the Government Claims Act, commencing with Section 940 of the California Government Code, and, in the alternative, under Section 5097 of the Code of Revenue and Taxation, for a refund of all fees and charges paid to the Temecula Community Services District (the "TCSD" or "District") on account of the Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course (the "Property") for fiscal years 1992-93 through 1995-967 We also write to appeal the TCSD rates and charges which have been levied on the Property for fiscal year 1996-97. The TCSD has levied the following charges against the Property over the past four years: Community Park~ Service ! evel A Fiscal Year 1992-93 8,714.02 622.00 Fiscal Year 1993-94 9,567.10 622.92 Fiscal Year 1994-95 10,092.64 625.00 Fiscal Year 1995-96 10,298.92 621.98 Regency Properties, L.P., ("Regency") has paid all such charges in a timely fashion. See Declaration of Paul L. Reed (attached hereto). 1. The Property consists of the following Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 922-220002, 922- 220004, 922-220-007, 922-222-008, 922-230-002, 922-230-003, 922-230-004, 922-230-007, 922-230,-008. KSC MANAGEMENT, INC. 533 Coast Boulevard South, La Jolla, CA 92037 {6191 454-9793 FAX (619! 459-6758 Temecula Community Services District November 27, 1996 Page 2 According to the TCSD, the charges levied against the Property fall into two categories, Community Services, Parks and Recreation, and "Service Level A", consisting of "arterial street lighting and median maintenance". l~.xhibit A. According to the TCSD, each property within the District is assigned an Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("El)U") factor reflecting the properry's land use and degree of benefit from the service being provided. The TCSD service charge is then calculated by multiplying the EDU factor for the property times the number of acres for the property times a charge per EDU set by the TCSD according to budgeted expenditures. Id. Prior to the I996-97 fiscal year, the Property was assigned an EDU factor of 0.5, a factor assigned to property utilized for "agricultural" uses. gxhibit B. Although the Property has been, and continues to be, utilized as a golf course, the "agricultural" designation was appropriate among the TCSD's other land use designations. As a golf course, the Property provides a significant amount of open space and recreation for the community's benefit -- the very object served by the TCSD fee -- in contrast with developed or vacant residential or commercial property. The TCSD charge was then calculated by multiplying the EDU factor of 0.5 times the number of acres for the Property times the charge per EDU set by the TCSD according to each fiscal year's budget. Id. The TCSD has now proposed to revise the EDU factor for the Property for the 1996-97 fiscal year from 0.5 EDU to 2 EDU, effectively quadrupling the fees and charges levied against the Property, although there has been no change in the land use of the Property and no change in the level of any benefits being provided to the Property. Regency raises three objections to the TCSD charges. First, the charges constitute a tax subject to article XIII A, section 4 of the California Constitution. Article XIII A states that "cities, counties and special districts" cannot impose a tax on property without a two-thirds vote of the qualified electors of the district. The charges levied by the TCSD have all the hallmarks of a tax. See Government Code § 53721. The charges are being levied to raise revenue for parks and recreation facilities and street lighting, all general governmental services and programs benefitting the community in general. F. xhibit C. The TCSD provides no direct service or special benefit to the Property, and the TCSD's expenditures have no relationship to any impact associated with the Property. If anything, the Property serves the yery purpose bah/red the TCSD's creation, the provision of open space and recreation facilities for the community's benefit. Although the TCSD charges constitute a tax, requiring a two-thirds vote of the qualified electors of the District, the TCSD has purported to levy charges for the fiscal year 1996- KSC MANAGEMENT, INC. 533 Coast Boulevard South, La Jolla, CA 92037 16191 454-9793 FAX {619) 459-6758 Temecula Community Services District November 27, 1996 Page 3 97 and for past fiscal years by ordinance, and without a vote of the electorate. The charges are therefore in violation of the California Constitution, and Regency is entified to a full refund of the charges it has paid on account of the Property with interest. See Revenue & Taxation Code § 5150. Second, even if the TCSD could levy a charge against the Property for parks and recreation facilities and street lighting without a vote of the electorate, there is no rational relationship between the charges which have been levied against the Property and any benefit enjoyed by the Property. As noted, the TCSD calculates charges for services provided by the District by multiplying an assigned EDU factor times the acreage of the parcel (for nonresidential property) times the charge per EDU established by the TCSD according to each fiscal year's budget. The District's system for allocating charges for District expenditures, however, erroneously assumes that there is some relationship between the services provided by such expenditures and a parcel's land use designation and density of use. We fully support the TCSD's goal of providing parks and recreation facilities to the City of Temecula and believe the Temecula Creek Inn makes a significant contribution to that end. At the same time, we benefit no more from a new roller hockey and skateboard facility, a recent project funded with TCSD charges, than the average homeowner, yet we are being asked to fund a much greater share of the cost. t:.xhibit C. For instance, for the 1996-97 fiscal year, the average homeowner pays a charge to the TCSD for such facilities based upon an EDU factor of one multiplied by the number of units on the parcel, one, times the charge per EDU, or $69.25. For the golf course, a parcel benefitting no more or less from recreation facilities than anyone else, Regency must pay its proposed EDU factor of 2, times the number of acres of the Property, or, 298.0~ acres, times the charge per EDU of $69.25, for a total of $41,272.62.~ Indeed, it is ironic that Regency is essentially being penalized for owning property with a relatively high number of acres - a factor given tremendous weight by the District's formula for calculating charges for parks and recreation facilities - when the Property is being utilized as a park and recreation facility and as open space. There is simply no rational basis for insisting that the Property, itself a park and recreation facility, pay nearly 600 times the amount of the average homeowner for parks and recreation facilities of general benefit to the community. The reason for this obvious anomaly is clear: the District's EDU-based formula simply does not fit its intended purpose. The EDU- based formula may be a rational basis for allocating charges where the cost of providing a service to a parcel may be measured by the parcel's density of use, such as the need for water or sewer 2. Of course, those who do not own parcels in the District, but who benefit from the facilities and programs funded by the District just the same, pay nothing. KSC MANAGEMENT, INC. 533 Coast Boulevard South. ka Jolla. CA 92037 (619) 454-9793 FAX {619) 459-675a Temeeula Community Services District November 27, 1996 Page 4 service. The larger the parcel, the more intense the use, the greater the demand on a city's, county's or special district's ability to provide such service. Here, however, the Property places no swain on the District's ability to provide parks and recreation facilities, has created no need for such facilities and benefits no more from such facilities than the average homeowner. If anything, the Property should be exempt from any charge for parks and recreation facilities because it is such a facility, although it receives no funds from the District. Even if one assumed the Property enjoyed some benefit from parks and recreation facilities above and beyond the average homeowner, because such facilities enhance the community in general, and attract users of the golf course, the District's formula is not a measure of any such "benefit".z The size of the Property -- a heavily weighted factor in the District's formula --has lit fie, if anything, to do with the volume of use of the golf course, standing alone or as compared to other commercial property. A commercial bank sitting on one acre would undoubtedly enjoy i~ far greater financial benefit from the attraction of residents to the community than a golf course, yet the golf course, because it has set aside nearly 300 acres for recreation and open space, is being asked to pay one hundred times the amount of a bank for recreation facilities under the District's formula. The bottom line is that there is no rational relationship between the intangible and indirect benefit of parks and recreation facilities and the density of use or size of a parcel. The District is comparing apples to oranges. Rather, the cost of general government programs and facilities can and should be borne by the entire community in a fair and equitable manner, and not be weighted against commercial properties and developers because it is politically expedient to do $O. Finally, even if one assumes the District can utilize its EDU-based formula for calculating charges for parks and recreation facilities, there is no rational basis in the record for the District's proposal to increase the EDU factor for the Property from 0.5 EDU to 2 EDU. The TCSD's stated reason for this revision is that: (1) the TCSD no longer utilizes the County of Riverside's land use designations in its formula for calculating charges, but'now utilizes the City of Temecula's recently adopted Development Code and Zoning Map; (2) although the Property was listed as agricultural property under the District's formula, a land use designation which exists under the County of Riverside's zoning map, the City of Temecula has no such designation in its Development Code, and (3) a g01f course, such as the Property, is now being categorized as an "outdoor commercial recreational use" under Section 17.14.020 of the Development Code "and 3. There is nothing in the administrative record to support such an assumption. KSC MANAGEMENT, INC. 533 Coast Boulevard South, ka Jolla, CA 92037 (619) 454-9793 FAX (619) 459-6758 Temecula Community Services District November 27, 1996 Page 5 is not cha.~ified as agricultural property." Letter of Beryl Yasinoslcy, City of Temecula, to Paul Reed dated May 20, 1996 (l=.xhibit 1:i). With that in mind, the District now proposes to arbitrarily levy golf courses such as the Property at 2 EDU per acre, rather than 0.5 EDU per acre, because "the TCSD cannot ignore the fact that the golf course improvements are utilized for commercial purposes." Id; see also Memo of David W. Hogan, Senior Planner, to Shawn Nelson, Community Services Director, dated September 19, 1996 (l:.xhibit D). The District's explanation only begs the question. Why are parks and recreation facilities and open space, such as the golf course, now being levied at 2 EDU instead of 0.5 EDU? Whether the Property is characterized as an "agricultural" use, "open space" or a "parks and recreation" facility, the bottom line is that it has been, and continues to be, utilized as a golf course. There has been no change in the level of service or benefit provided to the Property by the District and no change in the land use of the Property which could possibly justify a fee increase. The District is simply giving the Property a new label and arbitrarily quadrupling the levy. Nor is it any answer that the Property is being utilized for a "commercial purpose." Agricultural property is utilized for a commercial purpose. The golf course has been utilized as a commercial recreation facility for years. Although a commercial facility, the District has levied the Property at 0.5 EDU because, whatever label is attached, the Property has been and continues to be utilized as open space and as a parks and recreation facility, which justifies a levy at a lower rate given the attendant benefits of such a facility.a-t In sum, there is nothing in the record to support the District's proposal to arbitrarily increase the levy against the Property. If the District can legally levy a charge against the Property for parks and recreation facilities, and utilize its EDU-based formula for doing so, the levy should remain at 0.5 EDU given the Property's contribution to the community's supply of parks and recreation facilities and its utilization as open space. 4. 22.7 acres of the Property cannot be developed due to slope and flood plain restrictions. See Exhibit l:.. At the very minimum, this portion of the Property should be levied at the rate of 0.5 EDU because it is clearly open space. KSC MANAGEMENT, INC. 533 Coast Boulevard South. La Jolla, CA 92037 (61B) 454-9793 FAX 1619) 459-6758 Temecula Community Services District November 27, 1996 P~e 6 We would be happy to meet with the District to discuss the issues raised by this letter and it is our intent to work with the District to resolve this matter in an amicable fashion. The Distfict's current proposed levy, however, in addition to being unsupported by the record and inequitable, threatens to place a severe hardship and strain on the Properry's ability to continue to operate and must be addressed. Executive Vice President Enclosures K$C MANAGEMENT, INC. 533 Coast Boulevard South, La Jolls. CA 92037 (619) 454-9793 FAX (679) 459-6758 Temecula Community Services District November 27, 1996 Page 7 be.c: Barry J. Shorts, Esq. KSC MANAGEMENT, INC. 533 Go~t Boulevard South. La Jolla, CA 92037 (619) 454-9793 FAX (619) 459-6758 DECI.ARATION OF PALfl. l,. REED I, Paul L. Reed, declare as follows: 1. I am the Executive Vice-President of KSC Management, Inc., CKSC") which manages various properties and facilities in the Southern California area, including the Temecula Creek Inn in Temecula, California on behalf of Regency Properties, L.P. ("Regency"), the owner by grant deed of the property and facilities. By reason of the foregoing, I have firsthand personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein, and if called as a witness, could and would testify competenfly thereto under oath. 2. Among other responsibilities, I have overseen the payment of charges levied by the Temecula Community Services District (the "TCSD" or "District") against the Temecula Creek Inn, including that portion of the facility utilized as a golf course. The portion of the Temecula Creek Inn utilized as a golf course has been assigned the following Assessor's Parcel Numbers by the TCSD (the "Property"): 922-220-002, 922-220-004, 922-220-007, 922-222-008, 922-230-002, 922-230-003, 922-230-004, 922-230-007, 922-230-008. 3. Over the past four fiscal years, the TCSD has levied the following charges against the Property: Community Parks Service Ievel A Fiscal Year 1992-93 8,714.02 622.00 Fiscal Year 1993-94 9,567.10 622.92 Fiscal Year 1994-95 10,092.64 625.00 Fiscal Year 1995-96 10,298.92 621.98 4. KSC has timely paid all charges levied against the Property by the TCSD for fiscal years 1992-93 through 1995-96 on behalf of Regency. 5. According to the TCSD, the charges levied against the Property fall into two categories, Community Services, Parks and Recreation, and 'Service Level A", consisting of arterial street lighting and median maintenance. Each property within the District is assigned an Equivalent Dwelling Unit CEDU') factor reflecting, in the TCSD's view, the property's land use and degree of benefit from the service being provided. The TCSD service charge is then calculated by multiplying the EDU factor for the property times the acreage of the property times a charge per EDU set by the TCSD according to budgeted expenditures. 6. The Property was assigned an EDU factor of 0.5 by the TCSD for fiscal years I992-93 through 1995-96, a factor assigned to property utilized for 'agricultural" usesi TCSD charge was then calculated by multiply/ng the EDU factor of 0.5 times the number of acres-' for the Property times the charge per EDU set by the TCSD according to each fiscal year's budget. 7. The TCSD lmas now proposed to revise the EDU factor for the Property for the 1996-97 fiscal year from 0.5 EDU to 2 EDU, effectively quadrupling the fees and charges le~4ed against the Property, although there has been no change in the land use of the Property and no change in the level of any benefits being provided to the Property. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this Declaration was executed this 2nd day of December 1996 at San Diego, California. ~~_ ~ Paul L. Reed City of Temecula April 9, 1997 Mr. Paul L. Reed, Vice President KFC Management, Inc. dba Teme~la Creek Inn 533 Coast Boulevard South La Jolla, California 92037 Notice of Determination Regarding Appeal Dear Mr. Reed: I have reviewed your written appeal dated November 27, 1996 on behalf of Regency Prope~es, L.P., with respect to Community Services, Parks and Recreation and Service Level A rates and charges levied by the Temecula Community Services District against Assessor's Parcel Numbers 922-220- 002, 922-220-004, 922-220-007, 922-222-008, 922-230-002, 922-230-003,922-230-004, 922-230- 007 and 922-230-008 for fiscal year 1996-97. Based on the information provided in your appeal and during our meeting on Ianuary 14, 1997, I have determined to partially grant your appeal and to reduce the Community Services, Parks and Recreation and Service Level A ra~es and charges against your property for fiscal year 1996-97 from $44,372.20 to $40,992.62. This reduction is based on the information you provided that 22.7 acres of the subject property is undevelopable due to slope and flood plan restfictions. However, I have determined that the 2.0 EDU per acre rates applied to rest of the subject property is appropriate and I will not grant your appeal on this issue. The golf course is more appropriately treated as a non-residential use than as a residential use. Non-residential uses are more appropriately charged on a per acre basis than on a per-parcel basis, ~ven the disparity in size between non- residential properties and the corresponding disparity in the number of customers and employees using those properties and using the services and facilities provided to those properties by the Temecula Community Services District. If you disagree with my determination, you may appeal that determination to the Board of'Directors of the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD). Your appeal must be in writing, must contain the information included in your original appeal, and must be filed with the TCSD Secretary within 10 days after the date of this letter. Sincerely, CITY OF TEM~CULA Ronald E. Bradley General Manager Temecula Community Services District CC:- Shawn Nelson Barry I. Shotts, Esq. Peter M. Thorson, Esq. Rubin D. Weiner, Esq. VIA FACSIMI! f {909) 694-6499 Board of Directors Temecula Community Services District P.O. Box 9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Re: TCSD Rates and Charges Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course To the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District: This letter will serve as a formal appeal of the determination of the General Manager of the Temecula Community Services District ("TCSD") denying Regency Properties', L.P. ("Regency") appeal of the TCSD rates and charges levied on the Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course (the "Property")~ for fiscal year 1996-97. The General Manager's determination was rendered in a letter dated April 9, 1997, and is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Regency's original appeal of the TCSD rates and charges, submitted to Mr. Bradley on November 27, 1996, is attached hereto as Exhibit B. Without restating the information presented in Regency's November 27, 1996 letter, the basis of Regency's current appeal of the General Manager's determination is that: (1) the TCSD charges constitute a tax subject to Article XlII A, Section 4 of the California Constitution which has not been approved by a two-thirds vote of the qualified electors of the district; (2) there is no rational relationship between the charges which have been levied on the Property and any level of benefit enjoyed by or provided to the Property; and (3) the TCSD's decision to increase the levy on the Property from a basis of 0.5 Equivalent Dwelling Units ("EDU") to 2 EDU's is without any support or rational basis in the administrative record. In particular, there has been no change in the level of service or benefit provided to the Property, and no ~ The Property consistsofthefollowing Assessor's ParceiNumbers: 922- 220-002, 922,220-004, 922-220-007, 922-222-008, 922-230-002, 922-230-003, 922-230-004, 922-230-007, and 922-230-008. KSC MANAGEMENT, INC. 533 Coast Boulevard South, La Jolla, CA 92037 {619) 454-9793 FAX (619} 459-6758 Board of Directors Temecula Community Services District April 18, 1997 Page Two change in the land use of the Property which could possibly justify a change in the levy from 0.5 EDU to 2 EDU.= Regenc¥'s November 27, 1996 appeal to the General Manager of the TCSD sets forth the basis for Regency's appeal in greater detail. Sincerely yours, REGENCY PROPERTIES, L.P. a California limited partnership By: KSC MANAGEMENT, INC. a California corporation Executive Vice President Enclosures Regency does not appeal that portion of the General Manger's determination that 22.7 acres of the Property is undevelopable and should not be the basis for a levy of TCSD rates and charges. KSC MANAGEMENT, INC. 533 Coast Boulsvard South, La Jolla, CA 92037 (619) 454-9793 FAX (619) 459-6758 l~.xhibit "A" City of Temecula 43200 ~.~ne~ ParZ Dm/e - Ternecul3. C~, c72590 · ~l~ngAaare~: P© B~ 903.~ · Terne~ ~ CA 92.589-903.3 (90~ 6c~-6~-~ · F~x 1909) 69~.1999 April 9, 1997 Mr. Paul L. Reed, V'~ce President KFC Management, Inc. dba Temeeula Creek Inn 533 Coast Boulevard South La 3olla, California 92037 Notice of Determination Regarding Appeal Dear Mr. Reed: I have reviewed your written appeal dated November 27, 1996 on behalf of Regency Properties, L.P., with respect to Community Services, Parks and Recreation and Service Level A rates and charges levied by the Temecula Community Services District ~ainst A~sessor's Parcel Numbers 922-220- 002, 922-220-004, 922-220-007, 922-222-008, 922-230-002, 922-230-003,922-230-004, 922-230- 007 and 922-230-008 for fiscal year 1996-97. Based on the information provided in your appeal and during our meeting on January 14, 1997, I have determined to partially grant your appeal and to reduce the Community Services, Parks and Recreation and Service Level A rates and charges against your property for fiscal year 1996-97 from $44,372.20 to $40,992.62. This reduction is based on the information you provided that 22.7 acres of the subject property is undevelopable due to slope and flood plan restrictions. However, I have determined that the 2.0 EDU per acre rates appl~'ed to rest of the subject property is appropriate and I will not grant your appeal on this issue. The golf course is more appropriately treated as a non-residential use than as a residential use. Non-residential uses are more appropriately charged on a per acre basis than on a per-parcel basis, given the disparity in size between non- residential properties and the corresponding disparity in the number of customers and employees using those properties and using the services and facilities provided to those properties by the Temecula Community Services District. I~you d~sa~'ee wi~ my determination, you may appeal that determination to the Board of Direc~ors of' the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD). Your appeal must be in writing, must contain the ~nform~on included in your ori~[nal appeal, and must be filed with the TCSD Secretary within 10 d~ys der the date of this letter. S~cerely, CITY OFTEMECULA Ronald E. Bradley General Manager Temecula Community Services District CC:- Shawn Nelson Barry I. Shorts, Esq. Peter M. Thomon, Esq. Rubin D. Weiner, Esq. F. xhibit "B" City of Temecula 43174 l]u~in~ Park Dnv~ * Temecu13. California ~2590 May 20, 1996 Mr. Paul L. Reed Executive Vice President KSC _~ement, Inc. 533 Coast Boulevard South La Jolla, CA 92037 Subject: Proposed Temecuta Community Services District (TCSD) Rates and Charges for Golf Courses - Fiscal Year 1996-97 Dear Mr. Reed: I would Like to take this opportunity to respond to your letter addressed to City Manager Ron Bradley regarding the apportionment of the TCSD Rates and Charges for golf courses witkin the City. of Temecula. The base unit of the TCSD Rates and Charges is equal to the Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) of one (1). For Fiscal Year 1996-97, the proposed rate per EDU for Community Services, Parks and Recreation is $69.24, and $5.20 per EDU for Service Level A. Tnis factor is applied to all single family dwelling units and serves as the basis of the rate applied to the other land use designations. The charge is applied to vacant residential property at two (2) EDU's per acre; vacant, non-residential property at four (4) EDU's per acre; and improved, non-residential property ax six (6) EDU's per acre. Upon incorporation of the City in 1989, the TCSD levy was prepared relative to the County's l~nd use designations. lqowcver, the County's land use designatio .ns and zoning ordinances were proved to be outdared and, in many cases, 'maccurate. On January 25, 1996, the City adopted its own Development Code and corresponding Zoning Map. As a result, the T¢$D had to update the levy roll for cons/stency with the City's land use designations. l~rsuant to the results of a parcel audit, it was determined that agricultural land uses no longer exist within the City limits. Therefore, those parcels that were previously identified in the TCSD levy as a~'icultural property were reviewed for current use and zoning. The Temecula Creek Golf Course is one of the properties previously identified as agricultural property, which had been levied at the agricultural rate of .5 EDU per acre. l~suant to Section 17.14.020 of the Development Code, golf comes are desc-m'bed as an outdoor commercial recreational use, requizing an application for a conditional use permit in order to operate. Golf course property is improved for commercial use and is not classified as a~'iculmml prol:~. According to the TCSD rate applications id~ified above, all developed golf course facilities should be levied at six (6) ]~E}U's per acre. While the TCSD cannot ignore the fact that the golf course improvements are ut~li?_ed for commerc/al purposes, the TCSD also recognizes the associated recreational benefits that are aw,~ahle tn the public. Therefore, rather than levy the golf courses as comme~4-al properry, at s~m (6) EDU's per acre, the TCSD is proposing to levy the golf courses at the rate of two (2) EDU's per acre, or $138.48 per acre for Community Sevices, Parks and Recreation, and $10.40 per acre for Service level. A (arteriM street lighting). In addition, the application of two (2) EDU's per acre for golf com-,,es i~ consistent with the rate char~d to the Temeku Golf Course. I hope that this information heIps m claxify your concerns. If you desire to file an appeal of the Rates and Cha_,-ges, an appeal form must be obtained from the TCSD and completed prior to December 2, 1996. If you have any further questions, please contact me at (909) 694-6480. SLuc.~rely, CITY OF ~IECI. JW_,A Beryl Yasinosk'y Development Services Analyst CC: Ronald Bradley, City Manager Shawn Nelson, Director of Community Services Fxhibit "B" * Please see reverse side* ~- -. . ~-- ~ ~- ~. ............................,.~. .................. ....~ ~ ....~ ~._'-'~~~~~,.~-~ .~.~.j- -~_ ......................................... ~ ..... .....~;,. ......... Please complete the following informa~on: Name: ~ecje.qc~ P~ope~Hes, L.P., c~a ~ Creek lrm Date: 11-27-96 Mailing Address: 533 Coast ]~m].evarcl South., I.a Jol_l~, CA 92037 Property Adairess lif applicable): 44501 l~nbc~ Ca~yc~ :Rc~d, 'l~nec-~l.a, ~ 92592 Assessor's Parcel Number (APN): 922-220-002; 922-220-004; 922-220-007; 922-222-008; 922-230-002; 922-230-003; 922-230-004; 922-230-007; 922-230-008 Telel~hone Number(s) where your can be reached: (619) 454-9793, ext. 109 In order to expedite your Appeal Review, please indicate the type of appeal you are requesting and include the information indicated below as it applies to your properlT. You may also attach any additional information that you feel is relevant to suppor~ your appeal. 1. Appeal of Classification X Please check if applicable Please include: Notice of Public Hearing which indicates the proposed TCSD Rates and Charges for your property. Zoning information and current use of property. Copy of Section of CC&R's which identifies any development restrictions (if applicable). Proof of ownership (copy of grant deed) 2. Appeal for Hardship Please check if applicable Please include: Notice of Public Hearing which indicates the l~roposed TCSD Rates and Charges for your i~roperty. Proof of ownership (copy of grant deed) Proof of age (must be 62 years or older) OR proof of disability. Income verification ($13,200 per individual or $24,000 per household). PLEASE SUMMARIZE THE BASIS OF YOUR APPEAL: Please see attached letter dated November 27, 1996 November 27, 1996 Temecula Community Services District P.O. Box 9033 Teme~ula, California 92589-9033 Attention: Mr. Ronald Bradley, City Manager, City of Temecula Re: TCSD Rates and Charges/Temeeula Creek Inn Golf Course D~ar Mr. Bradley: We are writing to submit a claim under the Government Claims Act, commencing with Section 940 of the California Government Code, and, in the alternative, under Section 5097 of the Code of Revenue and Taxation, for a refund of all fees and charges paid to the Temecuta Community Services District (the "TCSD" or "District") on account of the Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course (the "Property") for fiscal years 1992-93 through 1995-967 We also write to appeal the TCSD rates and charges which have been levied on the Property for fiscal year 1996-97. The TCSD has levied the following charges against the Property over the past four yea. rs' Commtmitv Parks Service Ievel ^ Fiscal Year 1992-93 8,714.02 622.00 Fiscal Year 1993-94 9,567.10 622.92 Fiscal Year 1994-95 10,092.6~ 625.00 Fiscal Year 1995-96 10,298.92 621.98 Regency Properties, L.P., ("Regency") has paid all such charges in a timely fashion. See Declaration of Paul L. Reed (attached hereto). 1. The Property consists of the following Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 922-220-002, 922- 220-004, 922-220-007, 922-222-008, 922-230-002,922-230-003,922-230-004, 922-230-007, 922-230-008. KSC MANAGEMENT, INC. 533 Coast Boulevard South, La Jolla, CA 92037 (619} 454-9793 FAX f619) 459-6758 Temecula Community Services District November 27, 1996 Page 2 According to the TCSD, the charges levied against the Property fall into two categories, Community Services, Parks and Recreation, and "Service Level A", consisting of "arterial street lighting and median maintenance". l=.xhibit A. According to the TCSD, each property within the District is assigned an Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") factor reflecting the propercy's land use and degree of benefit from the service being provided. The TCSD service charge is then calculated by multiplying the EDU factor for the property times the number of acres for the property times a charge per EDU set by the TCSD according to budgeted expenditures. Id. Prior to the 1996-97 fiscal year, the Property was assigned an EDU factor of 0.5, a factor assigned to property utilized for "agricultural" uses. ~:.xhibit B. Although the Property has been, and continues to be, utilized as a golf course, the "agricultur'aJ" designation was appropriate among the TCSD's other land use designations. As a golf course, the Property provides a s~gnificant amount of open space and recreation for the community's benefit -- the very object served by the TCSD fee -- in contrast with developed or vacant residential or commercial property. The TCSD charge was then calculated by multiplying the EDU factor of 0.5 times the number of acres for the Property times the charge per EDU set by the TCSD according to each fiscal year's budget. I.d. The TCSD has now proposed to revise the EDU factor for the Property for the 1996-97 fiscal year from 0.5 EDU to 2 EDU, effectively quadrupling the fees and charges levied against the Property, although there has been no change in the land use of the Property and no change in the level of any benefits being provided to the Property. Regency raises three objections to the TCSD charges. First, the charges constitute a tax subject to article X1TI A, section 4 of the California Constitution. Article XIII A states that "cities, counties and special districts" cannot impose a tax on property without a two-thirds vote of the qualified electors of the district. The charges levied by the TCSD have all the hallmarks of a tax. See Government Code § 53721. The charges are being levied to raise revenue for parks and recreation facilities and street lighting, all general governmental services and programs benefitting the community in general. ~:.xhibit C. The TCSD provides no direct service or special benefit to the Property, and the TCSD's expenditures have no relationship to any impact associated with the Property. If anything, the Property serves the yery purpose behind the TCSD's creation, the provision of open space and recreation facilities for the community's benefit. Although the TCSD charges constitute a tax, requiring a two-thirds vote of the qualified electors of the District, the TCSD has purported to levy charges for the fiscal year 1996- KSC MANAGEMENT, INC. 533 Coas! Boulevard South, La Jolla, CA 92037 1619) 454-9793 FAX (619) 459-6758 Temecula Community Services District November 27, 1996 Page 3 97 and for past fiscal years by ordinance, and without a vote of the electorate. The charges are therefore in violation of the California Constitution, and Regency is entitled to a full refund of the charges it has paid on account of the Property with interest. See Revenue & Taxation Code § 5150. Second, even if the TCSD could levy a charge against the Property for parks and recreation facilities and street lighting without a vote of the electorate, there is no rational relationship between the charges which have been levied against the Property and any benefit enjoyed by the Property. As noted, the TCSD calculates charges for services provided by the District by multiplying an assigned EDU factor times the acreage of the parcel (for nonresidential property) times the charge per EDU established by the TCSD according to each fiscal year's budget. The District's system for allocating charges for District expenditures, however, erroneously assumes that there is some relationship between the services provided by such expenditures and a parcel's land use designation and density of use. We fully support the TCSD's goal of providing parks and recreation facilities to the City of Temecula and believe the Temecula Creek Inn makes a significant contribution to that end. At the same time, we benefit no more from a new roller hockey and skateboard facility, a recent project funded with TCSD charges, than the average homeowner, yet we are being asked to fund a much greater share of the cost. g. xhibit C. For instance, for the 1996-97 fiscal year, the average homeowner pays a charge to the TCSD for such facilities based upon an EDU factor of one multiplied by the number of unit~ on the parcel, one, times the charge per EDU, or $69.25. For the golf course, a parcel benefitting no more or less from recreation facilities than anyone else, Regency must pay its proposed EDU factor of 2, times the number of acres of the Property, or, 298.04 acres, times the charge per EDU of $69.25, for a total of $41,272.62Y Indeed, it is ironic that Regency is essentially being penalized for owning property with a relatively high number of acres -- a factor given tremendous weight by the District's formula for calculating charges for parks and recreation facilities - when the Property is being utilized as a park and recreation facility and as open space. Them is simply no rational basis for insisting that the Property, itself a park and recreation facility, pay nearly 600 times the amount of the average homeowner for parks and recreation facilities of general benefit to the community. The reason for this obvious anomaly is clear: the District's EDU-based formula simply does not fit its intended purpose. The EDU- based formula may be a rational basis for allocating charges where the cost of providing a service to a parcel may be measured by the parcel's density of use, such as the need for water or sewer 2. Of course, those who do not own parcels in the District, but who benefit from the facilities and programs funded by the District just the same, pay nothing. KSC MANAGEMENT, INC. S33 Cosst Boulevard South, La Jolla. CA 92037 (619) 454-9793 FAX {619) 459-6758 Temecula Community Services District November 27, 1996 Page 4 service. The larger the parcel, the more intense the use, the greater the demand on a city's, county's or special district's ability to provide such service. Here, however, the Property places no strain on the District's ability to provide parks and recreation facilities, has created no need for such facilities and benefits no more from such facilities than the average homeowner. If anything, the Property should be exempt from any charge for parks and recreation facilities because it is such a facility, although it receives no funds from the District. Even if one assumed the Property enjoyed some benefit from parks and recreation facilities above and beyond the average homeowner, because such facilities enhance the community in general, and attract users of the golf course, the District's formula is not a measure of any such "benefit".l' The size of the Property -- a heavily weighted factor in the District's formula -has little, if anything, to do with the volume of use of the golf course, standing alone or as compared to other commercial property. A commercial bank sitting on one acre would undoubtedly enjoy ii far greater financial benefit from the attraction of residents to the community than a golf course, yet the golf course, because it has set aside nearly 300 acres for recreation and open space, is being asked to pay one hundred times the amount of a bank for recreation facilities under the District's formula. The bottom line is that there is no rational relationship between the intangible and indirect benefit of parks and recreation facilities and the density of use or size of a parcel. The District is comparing apples to oranges. Rather, the cost of general government programs and facilities can and should be borne by the entire community in a fair and equitable manner, and not be weighted against commercial properties and developers because it is politically expedient to do Finally, even if one assumes the District can utilize its EDU-based formula for calculating charges for parks and recreation facilities, there is no rational basis in the record for the District's proposal to increase the EDU factor for the Property from 0.5 EDU to 2 EDU. The TCSD's stated reason for this revision is that: (1) the TCSD no longer utilizes the County of Riverside's land use designations in its formula for calculating charges, but now utilizes the City of Temeeula's recently adopted Development Code and Zoning Map; (2) although the Property was listed as agricultural property under the District's formula, a land use designation which exists under the County of Riverside's zoning map, the City of Temecula has no such designation in its Development Code, and O) a g61f course, such as the Property, is now being categorized as an "outdoor commercial recreational use" under Section 17.14.020 of the Development Code "and 3. There is nothing in the administrative record to support such an assumption. KSC MANAGEMENT, INC. 533 Coast Boulevard South, La Jolla, CA 92037 (619) 454-9793 FAX (619) 459-6758 Temecula Community Services District November 27, 1996 Page 5 is not classified as agricultural property." Letter of Beryl Yasinosky, City of Temecula, to Paul Reed dated May 20, 1996 0::-xhibit R). With that in mind, the District now proposes to arbitrarily levy golf courses such as the Property at 2 EDU per acre, rather than 0.5 EDU per acre, because "the TCSD carmot ignore the fact that the golf course improvements are utilized for commercial purposes.~ Id; see also Memo of David W. Hogan, Senior Planner, to Shawn Nelson, Community Services Director, dated September 19, 1996 (Exhibit r)). The District's explanation only begs the question. Why are parks and recreation facilities and open space, such as the golf course, now being levied at 2 EDU instead of 0.5 EDU? Whether the Property is characterized as an "agricultural" use, "open space" or a "parks and recreation" facility, the bottom line is that it has been, and continues to be, utilized as a golf course. There has been no change in the level of service or benefit provided to the Property by the District and no change in the land use of the Property which could possibly justify a fee increase. The District is simply giving the Property a new label and arbitrarily quadrupling the levy. Nor is it any answer that the Property is being utilized for a "commercial purpose." Agricultural property is utilized for a commercial purpose. The golf course has been utilized as a commercial recreation facility for years. Although a commercial facility, the District has levied the Property at 0.5 EDU because, whatever label is attached, the Property has been and continues to be utilized as open space and as a parks and recreation facility, which justifies a levy at a lower rate given the attendant benefits of such a facility? In sum, there is nothing in the record to support the Distfict's proposal to arbitrarily increase the levy against the Property. If the District can legally levy a charge against the Property for parks and recreation facilities, and utilize its EDU-based formula for doing so, the levy should remain at 0.5 EDU given the Properry's contribution to the community's supply of parks and recreation facilities and its utilization as open space. 4. 22.7 acres of the Property cannot be developed due to slope and flood plain restrictions. See Exhibit E. At the very minimum, this portion of the Property should be levied at the rate of 0.5 EDU because it is clearly open space. KSC MANAGEMENT, INC. 533 Coast Boulevard South. La Jolla, CA 92037 1619) 454-9793 FAX (619) 459-6758 Temecula Community Services District November 27, 1996 Page 6 We would be happy to meet with the District to discuss the issues raised by this letter and it is our intent to work with the District to resolve this matter in an amicable fashion. The Distdct's ~t proposed levy, however, in addition to being unsupported by the record and inequitable, threatens to place a severe hardship and swain on the Properry's ability to continue to operate and must be addressed. Executive Vice President Enclosures KSC MANAGEMENT, INC. 533 Coast Boulevard South, L~ Jolla, CA 92037 (619) 454-9793 FAX (619) 459-6758 Temecula Community Services District November 27, 1996 Page 7 bcc: Barry J. Shorts, Esq. KSC MANAGEMENT, INC. 533 C~t Boulevard South, L~ Joll-, CA 92037 (619) 454-9793 FAX (619) 459-6758 DECI.ARATION OF PAUl. !.. REED I, Paul L. Reed, declare as follows: 1. I am the Executive Vice-President of KSC Management, Inc., ("KSC") which manages various properties and facilities in the Southern California area, including the Temecula Creek Inn in Temecula, California on behalf of Regency Properties, L.P. ("Regency"), the owner by grant deed of the property and facilities. By reason of the foregoing, I have firsthand personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein, and if called as a witness, could and would testify competently thereto under oath. 2. Among other responsibilities, I have overseen the payment of charges levied by the Temeeula Community Services District (the "TCSD" or "District") against the Temecula Creek Inn, including that portion of the facility utilized as a golf course. The portion of the Temecula Creek Inn utilized as a golf course has been assigned the following Assessor's Parcel Numbers by the TCSD (the "Property"): 922-220-002, 922-220-004, 922-220-007,922-222-008, 922-230.002, 922-230-003,922-230-004, 922-230-007, 922-230.008. 3. Over the past four fiscal years, the TCSD has levied the following charges against the Property: Community Parks Service Ievel A Fiscal Year 1992-93 8,714.02 622.00 Fiscal Year 1993-94 9,567.10 622.92 Fiscal Year 1994-95 10,092.64 625.00 Fiscal Year1995-96 10,298.92 621.98 4. KSC has timely paid all charges levied against the Property by the TCSD for fiscal years 1992-93 through 1995-96 on behalf of Regency. 5. According to the TCSD, the charges levied against the Property fall into two categories, Community Services, Parks and Recreation, and "Service Level A", consisting of arterial street lighting and median maintenance. Each property within the District is assigned an Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("El)U") factor reflecting, in the TCSD's view, the properry's land use and degree of benefit from the service being provided. The TCSD service charge is then calculated by multiplying the EDU factor for the property times the acreage of the property times a charge per EDU set by the TCSD according to budgeted expenditures. 6. The Property was assigned an EDU factor of 0.5 by the TCSD for fiscal years 1992-93 through I995-96, a factor assigned to property utilized for "agricultural" uses/' The":-'":.7.7';:" TCSD charge was then calculated by multiplying the EDU factor of 0.5 times the number of acres-" ' for the Property times the charge per EDU set by the TCSD according to each fiscal yeaifs budget. 7. The TCSD has now proposed to revise the EDU factor for the Property for the 1996-97 fi~cal year from 0.5 EDU to 2 EDU, effectively quadrupling the fees and charges levied against the Pmpe~, although there has been no change in the land use of the Property and no change in the level of any benefits being provided to the Property. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this Declaration was executed this 2rid day of December 1996 at San Diego, California. ~ ~ Paul L. Reed CITY AT-I'ORNEY D RECrOR CITY MANAGF-R ~/~/~ Exhibit "A" CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: June 11, !996 SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: TCSD Proloosed Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 1996-1997 ~Ber¥1 Yasinosky, Develcloment Services Analyst That the Board of Directors: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES, PARKS AND RECREATION, STREET LIGHTING, SLOPE MAINTENANCE, RECYCLING AND REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICES AND STREET AND ROAD IMPROVEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996-1997. BACKGROUND: The pur~3ose of the TCSD Rates and Charges is to provide necessary community services and programs to pro13erw owners within the Ciw of Temecula. The TCSD is currently comprised of six (6) city-wide service levels and are identified as follows: 1. Community Services, Parks, and Recreation. 2. Service Level A - Arterial Street Lighting and Median Maintenance. 3. Service Level B - Residential Street Lighting. Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance. Service Level D - Recycling and Refuse Collection. 6. Service Level R - Streets and Roads. The formula used to levy the rates and charges has not been changed from last fiscal year. Every non-exempt parcel within the City will receive a rate and charge for two (2} service levels: Community Services, Parks, and Recreation, and Service Level 'A". Only those properb/owners who receive benefit from ~he remaining four (4) service levels pay for those services (residential street lighting, slope maintenance, recycling and refuse collection, and emergency maintenance of unpaved roads). Further, the Ci~ Council has recommended the continuance of the Revenue Excess Sharing in Temecula (REST). REST shares with the residents of Temecuta some of the effective economib development programs implemented by the City Council that have generated new revenues to the City. As a result, the City proposes to absorb $31 6,834in administrative and operational costs that, without this program, would have been charged to the Community Services, Parks, and Recreation budget and Service Level D, This savings of $316,~3~is proposed to be passed along to all property owners in Temecula, which will create a proposed savings of $8.07 for all single family residences. Therefore, the rate and charge for the Community Services, Parks and Recreation Service Level, for single family residences, is proposed to be $69.2~,, an increase of only .36 cents for the year. This increase is due to the addition of four (4) new neighborhood parks, the new Roller Hockey and Skateboard Facility, the acquisition of the Temecula Community Center, and the expansion of community recreation programs provided through the Temecuta Community Recreation Center and the Old Town Temecuia Senior Center. For Service Level "A", the proposed rate of $5.20 for a single family residence represents an increase of $1.04 from last year as a result of the installation of new traffic signals and arterial stree', lights. Service Level "B" includes only those property owners within residential subdivisions that have street lighting services. The proposed rate of $25.68 per pro0erty owner represents a decrease of $~.24 from last year as a result of additional residential development. Service Level "C" includes only those properW owners within residential subdivisions receiving TCSD maintenance of slopes and perimeter landscaping. The four (4) rate levels for Service Level "C" will not increase from last year and are identified as follows: Rate C-1: $ Rate 6-2.: $ 89.00 Rate C-3: $116.00 Rate C-4: $175.00 Service Level "D" provides the Recycling and Refuse Collection Program for Fiscal Year 1996- 1997. This service level includes all single family .residential properties in the City of Temecula. The proposed yearly rate of ,~162.78 has decreased $9.2.8 from last year as a result of reduced County landfill charges. However, it is expected that the Mead Valley landfill servicing our City will close sometime next year, which will increase waste processing and transportation costs for next year. Service Level 'R" includes only =hose parcels which receive benefit from the emergency maintenance of certain unpaved roads that are washed out during rainstorms. The two (2.) rate levels for Service Level R will not increase from last year and are identffied as follows: Residential Rate R-1: Vacant Rate R-l: $157.08 $ 78.54 Residential Rate R-2: $121.92 Vacant Rate R-2.: $ 60.96 In summary, the average single family residence receiving benefit from all service levets will have a net decrease in the TCSD Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 1996-1@97of $9.1~.from last year. ~ The levy and collection of the TCSD Rates and Charges is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQ. A) pursuant to Section 21080 (b)(8) of the California Publi~ Rescurces Code and Section 152.73 of the $;ate Guidelines because the rates and charges are necessary to maintain existing services within the TCSD. FISCAL IMPACT: The total Levy Budget for Fiscal Year 1996-97 is $ ~'-ne revenue generated from the TCSD Rates and Charges will fund the parks and recreation; median and slope maintenance; stree-. lighting; recycling and refuse collection services; and s~reets and road maintenance in the City of Temecuia. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. CSD 96-__ adopting :he TCSD Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year t 996-97. Final Annual Levy Report for F~scal Year 1996-,1997. EXI-KBIT A PROJECT SL ~'MlVL~RY TENIE~ COMM~~ SERVICES DISTRICT On Iuly 1, 1995, Muni Financial Services was remlned by the City. of Temee. ula to prepare the Annual Levy l~port for the Temecula Commnn½ty Services Disu:iet (TCSD) for the Fiscal Year 1996-97. Pursuant to the Community. Services Law, Division 3 of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of C~]i~ornia, commencing with Section 61000 e~, the TCSD has the power to levy and collect rates and charges in order to can'y on its operations and to provide the services and facilit/es furnished by it. The levy and collection of the rates and charges is accomplished by the assi~ment of benefit to each parcel within a specific service level. A Service Level is a defined area that provides a specific service, operation and maintenance and/or pro_re'am to only those parcels contained within that service level. The TCSD is curr=~ntly composed of six (6) city-wide service levels. The descriptions of the se,wice levels are as fonows: Community Services. Parks and Recreation. Operations, maintenance, and administration of the City. community. park systems, recreation facilities, services and pr%~rams. Service Level A - A.rterial Street Lights and Median Maintenance. Operations, maintenance, utility cosu, and administration of all arterial street lights, medians and traf~2c iig,aah. Service Level B - Residential Street Li_,zhu. Operations, maintenance, utility costs and admimstmtion of all residential street lights. o Service Level C - Perilmeter Landscapin~ and Slope Maintenance. Operations, maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and admlnl.m'afion for all perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD. Service Level D - Refuse. Collection. Recycling ~l ~treet Sweeping. Operations and ~dmlni~tration of the refuse and recycling pwgram, and street sweeping services for an single-family residential homes. 5. Service Level R - Streets and Roads. Construction, insmllafion, and maintenance of stree~ and ~ads. The F~c~ Analysis contorted her~n con~ each Service L~vel including wizh their totals for Nhc.~l Year 199~-~7 year to bc as follows: Community Service Level A Service Level B Service Level C Service Level D Service Level R $2,717,1562.00 $69.24. 204,092.00 5.20 252,94,8.00 25.68 508,482.00 ¥aziable 1,826,717.00 162.78 19,276.00 Variable TOTAL TCSD lwVY FY 96-97: $5,529,077.00 The Levy and Collection mounts for all non-exempt parcels within the TCSD for the Fiscal Year 1996-97 are as shown on the Assessment Roll on f-xle with the City Clerk. Fxhibit "C" CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEER'S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT FOR THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD), FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 FINAL REPORT SUBMITTED: l,~av 30, 1.c~c~ APPROVED' MuniFinancial Corporate Office 2Ei765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92590 Tel: (909) 699-3990 Fax: (909) 699-3460 San Francisco Bay Area Office One Donna Maria Way Odnda, CA 94563 Tet: (510) 376-1162 Fax: (510) 376-1162 oo TABLE OF CONTENTS I. OVERVIEW ...............................................................................................................1 A. Introduction .................................................................................................1 B. Description of the District and Services ...................................................2 C. Budget and Levy Summary ........................................................................3 II. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT ........................'. ................................................5 Ilk CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT ...............................................................................8 A, Modifications of the District Structure ......................................................8 B. Annexations ......................; ..........................................................................8 C. District Budget Changes ............................................................................9 IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS .............................................................................................'10 V. METHOD ~F APPORTIONMENT ...........................................................................12 APPENDIX A - LAND USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS ................................15 OVERVIEW Introduction The Temecula Community Services District (District) was formed in 1989 uocn inc2rpor~tion of the City of Temecula (City), to continue se.~/ices proviso:sty provided by the County of Riverside (County). The boundary of the Disuric*. is c~terminous with the City boundary, and includes all taxable parce!s withit, the City. The District collects special rates and charges in order to provide services and maintain the improvements within the District. The District was formed, and the rates and charges were set and established pursuant To Community Seroices Dis~ict Law 61000, Section 6~'62I, Title 6, Division 3 of the California Government Code (the Code). The Engineer's Annual Levy Report describes t,he District. ~r..y new any changes to the District, and the proposed rases and charges for Fiscal Year 1996/97. The rates and oh, aries are based or, the historical and estimate.._. cost to maintain the improvements that provide a direct and special beneft; to prope~ies within the District. The improvements and services within the Distric~ and the corresponding costs are bud.coted and charged Es separate So,ice Levels and include all expenditures, deficits, surpluses, and revenues. Each parcel charged receives direct beneft; from the services provided tc ~, ,=~ parcel by the District. ine word parc_l, for the purposes cf this R=~-~ refers to an individual :~roc~erty assigned its own Assessment Number by the Riverside County Assessor's Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Assessment Numbera and specific Fund Numbers, to identify on the tax roll, prope~ies charged for special district benefits. A Public Hearing is held each year before the District Board of Directors (Board), to allow the public an opportunity to hear and be heard regarding the District. Following consideration of all public comments and wd~e,~ protests at the noticed Public Hearing, and review of the Final Engineer's Annual Levy Report, the Board may order amendments to the Report, or confirm the Report as submiEed. Following final approval of the. Report,, and confirmation of the Rates and Charges (Charges), the Board shall order the levy and collection of Charges for Fiscal Year 1996/97. In such case, the levy inform, ation will be submitted to the Riverside County Auditor/Controller, and included as Charges on the property tax roll for Fiscal Year 1996/97. Description of the District and Services The District provides cer, ain services, and the maintenance of specific improvements within public right-of-ways and dedicated landscape easements throu~;hout the City. The District c=nsists of six (6) separate Service Love!s, providing specific services and benefit to parcels within certain areas throughout the City. Each ~parce[ within the District is grouped within two (2) or more Service Levels based upon its location, and the quantity and type of services provided within that are=-. Each Service Level has differing costs depending upon the various services and improvements provided. All parcels identff'ied within a Service Level, share in both the cost and the benefits .of the services. The costs associated with the services, are equitably spread among all benefiting parcels within that Service Level Each parcel is charged its fair s;"~are of the costs of the services in propoPtion to the estimated be.~efi[ received. The Service Levels are identified as fo[tows: · Community Service, Parks'and Recreation · Arterial Street Lighting and Medians · Residential Street Lighting · Local Landscaping and Slopes · Citywide Recycling and Refu~e · Rsad Improvement and Maintenance Services and improvements provided through the District include: the construction and maintenance of community parks; recreation programs; street lighting; median landscape maintenance; perimeter landscape maintenance; slope protection; a recycling and refuse collection program; and road improvement construction and maintenance. 2 C. Budget and Levy Summary Each Service Level provides different and specific services, that benefit various parcsis within the community and each Service Level is comprised of specific parce!s of differing types. The "Total Levy Units" and the resulting "Charge Per Levy Unit" (shown in Table !), reflect a method of apportionment that most fairly propor'dons the costs of the services to the benefit received by the parcels in that Service Level. For Community Services, Parks and Recreation, and Service ~Level A, levy units are calculated using a per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). The "Total Levy Units" for Service Levels B, C, and D is based on a per parcel count For Service Level R, levy units are based on a Parcel Development Unit .(PDU), which is similar to a per parcel count, but makes a distinction between developed an~l undeveloped parcels. For a more complete description of the methods used for calculating the "Total Levy Units" used for each Service Level, please refer to (Section V), Method of Apportionment and Appendix A. Table I on the following page, provides gener=-I levy information for the various Service Levels within the District, comparing Fiscal Year 1996/97 to the previous Fiscal Year· 3 · o° II.DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT Community Services, Parks, and Recreation provides a benefit to all parceis within the District and includes maintenance, service, and operations of all public parks in the District. Most park construction is provided either by developers as a condition of their residential projects, or through development impact fees. ~This Service Level also allowed for the construction of the Community Recreation Center and its debt service. This Service Level also provides funding for the vadous recreation programs throughout the City. The following is a list of some of the City's parks and recreation facilities: · Rancho Califomia SpoAs Park · · Sam Hicks Monument Park · · Veterans Park · · Bahia Vista Park · · Temecula Middle School Fieida · · Old Town Temecuta Senior Center · · Kent Hinder.:=-rdt Memcriat Park · · Temecula Elementary School Pool · · Bu~e..~eld Stage P~,rk · · Tamecute Roller Hockey Park · · Temecula Skate Park · · Temecula Community Recreation Center · Temecula Community Center Paloma Del Sol Park Loma Linda Park RiveAcn Park John Magee Park Pate Communi~ Park Voorburg Park Nakayama Park Nicolas Road Park Calte Aragon Park Temecuta Duck Pond Rotary Park Service Level A, Arterial Street Lighting and Medians provides a benefit to all parcels within the District and City through the servicing, operation, and maintenance of street lighting and landscaped medians along art. erial streets. Service Level B, Residential S~'eet Lighting provides a benefit to all single family residential and vacant parcels within those tracts requiring servicing, operation, and maintenance of local street lighting. 5 Service Level C, Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes provides the servicing, operation, and maintenance of perimeter landscaped areas and slopes within the public right-of-ways and dedicated easements within certain tracts. The level cf maintenance required within these tracts varies depending on operating costs, and.therefore four (4) rate levets have been established within Service Level C. Table II shows a listing of the tra~s in each of the four (-') rate leve!s ~'"" Service Level C (Penm.,_r Landscaping and Slopes.) TABLE !I Service Level C Tracts Name Tree! · Tra~ Name Tr'a~ ~ Tr4~ Name ?re= = ~N~*~OS 20~7~-C~ J 2~ :46-C= ~ ~ ~ 542 J 2gS7~ ~ 21~0~: ~1~o J =~=40~51 ~916-01 j vlt.~G~ GatteE Tr'4 ::: 215T2.0~ 21 ST 2167~1 21 21 21 ¢5-02 21675-02 21575~5 Z16TS-06 Service Level D, Citywide Recycling, Refuse and Street Sweepin9 provides for the operation and administration of the refuse and recycling program and street sweeping services for all single famiiy residential homes within the District. Service Level R, Roads provides funding for construction, improvement, service and maintenance of public streets and roads throughout the City. The seaices provided may include, but are not limited to: renovation or restoration due to damage; flood and drainage control; repairs and re-grading; and upgrades of the a existing areas as required for unpaved roads. Service Level R was added tc the District in Fiscal Year 1@.93/S4. All parce!s identified within Service Lave! share in both the cost and the benefits of the services provided. The assocli, ted with the services, are equitably spread among all benefitin; parce!s within various areas (rate levels) of the Service Level. Each parce! is charged its fair share of the costs of the services in propotion to the estimated benefit received. Service Level R currently has two (2) ra~e leve!s. The level of maintenance required within these ~¢o (2) -'ea- vary due to cpe:atin~ costs, therefore separate rate leve!s have been estaL, iished. Only the parcels within each of the two (2) boundary areas will be char_ced for the costs associated w~th servicin~c and maintaining the roads and streets in the area. Rate Level R-1 The parcels within this rate leve! ccnsis:s of one hundred twen~ (120) assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that are serviced and maintained thrcu;h the .District. This rate leve! provides fundin; for servicing and maintenance of: Nicolas Road; Greenwood Lane; Liefer Road; Gatlin Road; Pale Vista; Calle Girasol; Aussie Road; Calle Chapos; Walcott Road; and Tommy Lane. A total of 3.196 miies of roads are serviced and maintained in this area. Rate Level R-2 'Fne parce!s within this rate level consists of fifty-seven (57) assessable parce!s that have" a[r~.,, access tc roads or streets that are serviced and maintained through the DistTict. This rate level provides funding for servicing and maintenance of: Ormsby Road; Santiago Road; Lolita Road; and John Warner Road. A total of 1.003 miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area. 7 !!1. CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT For Fiscal Year 1996/97, changes within the D~s,r],., '~-' -=-- the levy are outlined below. Modifications of the District Structure Modificaticns to the District s~ucture, ff any, could include, but are not [imited tc: ~hanges or expansion in the existing improvements or in the types of services provided; addition of new services or Service Levels; restructuring of the current Service Levels; annexation of parce!s into the Distdct or Service Love!s; or revisions in the method of apportionment. Other than the annexations described in the following se=icn, no other modifications to the District are anticipated for the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Annexations Annexations to Service Level B (Resid'entiai Street Lighting), are 799 parce!s within Tracts: ~: : 2291 ~7827-01 1108%02 1..3.-00 21082-00 ~-00 23125-02 18518-00 20703-01 21675~0 22916-02 24132-00 27827-02 19872-02 21067~0 22761~0 23125-00 24132-01 27827~3 Annexations to Service Level C (Per[meter Landscaping and Slopes), are 222 parcels within the following trac;s: · Rate level #I -No New Tracts. · Rate level ¢2 - No New Tracts. · Rate level # 3 -Tract 18518-00 (Saddlewood-3 parcels); and Tract 22916-03 (Vintage Hills-75 parcels). · Rate level # 4 - Tracts 23125-00, 23125-01, & 23125-02 (Tradewinds-143 parcels). 8 ..' Annexations to Service Leve! D (Citywide Res'/cling and Street Sweeping): A total of 715 parce!s have been added to Service Leve! D for the 1998/97 Fiscal Year. No other annexations are planned to any of the other Service Levels or to the District for Fiscal Year 1996/97. District Budget Changes The Community Services, Parks and Recreation Se~ice Leve! budget has increased due to increased operations and maintenance costs, as well as expansion and improvements to several nei.ehborhood and community parks. Although the budget has increased significantly, the total levy units has atso increased resulting in less than a one percent increase in the rate and charges. Operations and energy costs for Se,~zice Leveis A (Arterial Street Lights) have increased significantly over the previous year. Although the total levy units has aiso increased for this service level, the pr=pcsed rate and charges for this service level will increase moderately. In Se~ice Level B (Residential Street Lighting), the budget has increased with the addition of new tracts, but the number of parcels added to the service level has allowed for a reduction in the rate and charges. Service Leve! D (Recycling and Refuse), rate and charges has decreased due to reduced costs for the service. 9 IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS T~-bie 111 on the nero two (2) p~-~ces show the D~s,,~.., budget for Fisc~-I TABLE iii 1998/97 DISTRICT BUDGET Temecuta Community Services District O=eratin~ Budget Depar'um, ent Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 1997 Yesr 191 I OI oi ~6gS I ~.~ 1 ~.~1 0t 01 Ol el ol ol o o o o o o o o o o o ol si~.o2o i 0 0 0 ol OI o 0 0 o 0 01 ol 01 Ol o! ol 01 't.Om I ot o! ol 0t 01 ol 01 ol ol ol 0 0 0 ~.;3~ I ~.evel R tTo~ 0 { 01 0 0 OI 0 0 4.~ t~.sg5 I.~ 0 0 ( ~.~ o l 0 t ~.8~ 0 ~ 4.~ 0 4~.275 0 1~.~ o t ~o.~ 0 T.7~ 0 0 375 ~ 395 I0 TABLE !11 1996/97 DISTRICT BUDGe' Temecuta Community Sen/ices District Oper;ating Budget Depar':ment Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 1997 5301 S3~ S~75 5~01 O 3.S37.1S7 I 0 0 01 0 ot o 01 01 0 01 0 01 01 0 01 ~ I t 0 OI I 0 0 0 01 I ol ~.~1 ~.s~ [ ~.~ ~ ~.m, el O I LevM R iTO~lJ 0 11 Me METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT As in past years, the cost to provide services within the District will be fairly distributed among each assessable property based upon the estimated benefit received by each property. The benefit formula used is based upon the Service Level, the land use and size of a property. For the Community Services, Parks, and Recreation Service Level; and Service ~Level A (Arterial Street Lighting and Medians); each property is assigned an Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) factor that reflects the prope,,-ty's land use and degree of benefit. For Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting); Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes); and Service Level D (Recycling and Refuse); the rates and charges are calculated on a per parcel basis. In Service Level R (Roads) each property is assigned a Parcel Development Unit (PDU) factor that reflects both parcel count and whether the parcel is developed. The following is the formula used to calculate each properry's District charges by EDU. Please refer to Appendix A for a complete listing of land use codes and their associated EDU. Community Services, Parks and Recreztion Service Level; and Service Level A (Arterial S~.reet Lighting and Medians): Parcel _:DU X Acres or Units X Charge per EDU = Parcel Char~7e The following is the formula used to calculate each properry's District charges by the per parcel method. Service Level B (Residential S~.reet Lighting); Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes); and Service Level B (Citywide Recyc!i,~g and Refuse): Total Balance 1~o Levy/Total Parcels (in Service Level) = Parcel Charlie The Rate Per Levy. Unit for Service Level R is based on a Parcel Development Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel charge, but makes a distinction between developed and undeveloped parcels. Service Level R (Roads): Parcel Development Units = ~.0 for Developed Parcels Parcel Development Units = 0.5 for Undeveloped Parcels Total Els/once to Levy/Total Parcel PDU (in rate Level) = Parcel Charg'e 12 Table IV shown on the next two pages, reflects the levy calculations property types for each Service Level. TABLE iV PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES, PARKS, AND RECRF_AT1ON Prol~er~y Type Single Fam~y Residential Mul~ Family Aesiclendal Single Family Vacant Non-Residential Vacant ~an-Residen~al lm=~ved Parcel t Charge t Parcel EDU X perEDU = Charge e.ooise.=.2~Is4~.4,1 ~r vadous Per Unit Per Unit Per Acre Per Acre Per Acre PARCEL CHARGE CAt'CULATIONS FOR SERVICE L_VEL A Prooerty Type Single Family Residential Multi Family Residential Single Family Vacant Non-Resi¢-ential Vacar, t Non-Reside.~al Ira:roved I Parcel J Char.=e [ ParceI EDU X 0er EDU = Charge I ~.ooI-'.~oI I ,.ooI~.=oI I s.ooIs~.=oI i Multi~lier Per Unit Per Unit Per Acre Per Ac.'e Per Acre PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE L.mFEL B Prooerty Ty!~e Single Fam~y Residential Single Family Vacant Parcel Charge Pamel Unit X per Parcel = Charge 1 .O0 $25.l~8 $25.68 1.00 225.68 S25.68 Multiplier Per Parcel Per Parcel 13 TABLE IV PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL C Property Type Single Family Residential Rate C-1 SinGle Fam~y Residential Rate C-2 Single Family Residential Rate C-3 Single Family Residential Rate C..4 Parcel Charge Unit X per Parcel = 1.00 1 $46.00 I 1.00 i 85.00 I 1.00 i 11EL00 I ~.oo i s175.oo Parcel Charge $46.00 89.00 116.00 $175.00 Mulfi131ier Per Parcel Per Parce! Per Parcel Per Parcel PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL D Property Type Single Famity Residential Parcel Charge Unit X ~=er Par=el = 1.oo I s~:.~s Par=el Charge I s1~z78 1 Multi13iie? Per Pare. e! PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL R Property Type Single Farofly Residential Rate R-1 Single Fam~ Vacant Rate R-1 Single Family Residential Rate Single Fam~y Vacant Rate 1=,-2 Parcel Charge Unit X Der Unit I 4.00 t s~?.o8 I o.~o i ~.oo I ~2~.g~ t o.~o Parcel Cha~e $157.08 78.54 I21.92 $60.96 MulfiDller Per Parcel Per Parcel Per Parcel Per Parcel 14 Appendix a - LAND USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type Single Family Residential Multi Family Residential Single Family Vacant Non-Residential Vacant Non-Residential Improved Equivalent Dwelling UnitsMultiplier 1.00 Units 0.75 Units 2.00 Acres 4.00 Acres 6.00 Acres 15 Appendix IB - 1996/97 COLLECTION ROLL Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the County Assessor's map for the year in which this report is prepared. Non-assessable lots or parcels include government owned land, public utility ~owned property, and land principally encumbered with public rights-of-way. A listing of parcels within this District, along with the charges, has been submitted to the City Clerk and, by referencs, is ,made part of this report. 16 RESOLUTION NO. CSD 96-0~ A I~VSOLUTION OF ~ BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF T]tE TENIE~ COMlVl-0NIT~ SERVICES DISI1R/CT ADOFI'hNG R_%TES AND C]~L~RGES FOR COl~MtS~ SERVICES/PAR]rS AND RECKEATION, LIGETING, SLOPE ~ANCE, RECYCTJNG AND REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICES AND $Ti~T AND ROAD INfPROV~-M~NTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996-97. wI:rh-R.EAS, upon incorporation of the City of Tem~'ula, Cat/fomia (the "City") eff~tive Dec~.mber 1, 1989, voters also approved the formation of the Temecula Community Stowices District ("TCSD"), which hm the same area and boundaries as the City and whose Board of Direcmr~ (the "Board") consism of the member~ of the City Council of the City; and WqSEKEAS, the TCSD proposed to continue such rates and charges for community sarvices and parks, recr~tion facilities, services and programs, operation, maintenance, set'vice and adminis=ation of stree~.t iighdng, slope rnaint~nance, ru~cycting and refuse collection, su'eet and mad improvemats (the "Servic~ and/or Facilities") for those areas specifi. cally benefitted thereby and charges by the county service areas or the TCSD for such services in prior fiscal years; and WIq'FREAS, the Board has requested the prepa..,"ation of a report for Fiscal Year 1996-97 mn ~mSz'dng the proposed rates and charges for filing with the Secretary of the TCSD pursuant to the Community. Services District Law being Division 3 of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 61000 (the "Act"); and Wlq'!=RE~, pursuant to Sec~on 61621.2 of the Act, an En=qneer's Report for Collection for the Fiscal Year 1996-97 (the "Report") has b~n presented and filed with the Secrem.,'y of the TCSD which conmira a description of the proposed Services and/or Facilities to be provided and the propo~t rar~ and ch,~=es for such Service~ and/or Facilities, and a description of the parcels subj~t to the rates and charges. The Report is based upon a budget adopted by the Board for the proposed Services and/or Facilities for specific areas where such Services and/or Facilities am provided, including necessary staff and administrative expenses; and W]EE~S, the Board request~:i that sniff provide mailed notice of the public hearing re=~'r~g ther~ ~ and charges .to each property owner subject to the rates and charges at least fourteen (14) days prior to the date set for the public hearing; and R~,~s.C~D\96.04 I W~[!:'!~F. AS, nodc~ of public hma_r~ was rn, i]ed and publish~i as rm:luired by law and the a~-/i~viu of pubiir.~on :d ma/Iin= are on fiie with th: S~retary; and W'~I~.~%S, ~ ~e public h~n~ conduct~ on 3une 11, 1996, as noticed, the TCSD h~rd and consid:~i ~11 oral and va'/men promrs and comments by any /nu:msm:l pc-son conc:'nin~ the proposed rats and charges or the method of their collation; ~nd ~, m the conclusion of the public hm~--ing, the TCSD conS._rm~ ~e m£es and char§es in the amounts set out on ~:xhibit 'A' entitled 'Projec~ Summary", attached and incorpoi~t~d by this r~ferznc:, confirmed their collection on the tax roll; and Vv'FFV~AS, the TCSD further finds that based on the Report and budget, the rates and charges as set out on l:xhibit "A" are the reasonable cost of the Services and/or Faciliries to be provided by the TCSD for Fisca~ Year 1996-97, and W'l:POmE.~.q, the TCSD proposes to collect the rates and charges at ',.he same time, in the same mann=, by the same persons and together with the not sepa:arely from, the property tax:s collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shall be de'2nquent at the same time and the'mR= be subjet m the same ~rmquency penaltim as such property taxes. All laws applicable m the lew, collection, and enforcement of prope .n-y taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the maners of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, are .a!:rplicable to these rates and charges, except for California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831. However, if for the first year the charge is levied, the real property to which the charge relar=s has been transreined or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien of a bona fide encumbrancer for value has ben camted and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the first installment of such taxes appear on the roll, then the charge, or the delinquency m that c,M.rge, = ~sessed pursuant to this section shall not result in a lien against the proper'ry, but instead shall be :~.nsferred to the unsecured roll for coll~tion; NOW, TI:rFT,.EFORE, TttE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF T1qT TEaM3ECT3LA COMlVlI3N1TY SERVICES D/STRICT DOES lqk'?RF~l~y, RESOLVE, DETERMllN'E AaND ORDER ,~ FOLLOWS: SF. CTION 1. The rates and c,harges for Fiscal Year 1996-97 as set out on ~.xhibit 'A" for the Se,wices and/or Facilities are adopted for Fiscal Year 1996-97. g¥CTIONr 2, The TCSD shall collect such rates and charges at the same time, in the same manner, by the same persons and together with and not sepa.~_te!y from, the property taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shall be delinquent at the same time and therm.ftm' be subjec~ to the same delinquency penaltim as such property taxes. All laws applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not lirnit~d m, those pertaining to the maners of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, are applicable to these rams and charges, except for California Revenue and Taxation Code Section ]te~. C~ D\96-0~ 2 48:31. However, if for the first year the ctm.rgoe is Im,'ied, the ~ property m which the charge ~,,.~ has been transfe:'c~d or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser. for value, or if a lien of a bona fid~ encumbmncer for value has been creat~ and artaches the.,~-.on, prior m the da~ on which the first installmen£ of. such taxea appear on the roll, then the charge, or the d¢Iinquency in that charg~, ~'s"~d pursuant tn this section shall not result in a lien against the property, but instead ahall be tr-~.n~m"r~ tn the unsecured roll for collection. ~q:'crroN 3. Ifa pr~aerty owner subje~ tn these mr~ and charge~ challenges or questions the levy of the rates and chargee tn such property owner's property, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing an appeal with the TCSD Secrem~ before .5:00 p.m. on D~ember 2, 1996, pursuant to procedures established by the TCSD. RF~CTION 4. If a property owner subject to these rams and chazges believes that payment of the rates and charges for fisc~l 3ear 1996-97 would cr~te ~. hardship for that prope:'ty owner during that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing a hardship appeal with the TCSD Sec~tary before 5:00 p.m. on D<ember 2, 1996, pursuant to procedures es:ablished by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the hardship appe~ prog?_m. g~C~ON 3. The TCSD S _em'emry is order~ to t:m.,:.smit or cause to be transmir ed to the County. Audkor of the County of Riverside, California (the 'County") before Augus: 10, 1996, the property tax roll with such rates and chargoes enumerated for each parcel not exempt therefrom; and the County. Auditor of the County is hereby designated, required, empowered, authorized, instructed, directed and ordered to make coRec:ion of all such assessments as shown on that roll and to pe~orrn any and all duties necessacy therefor. glzCTIO~r 6. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the levy and collection of these rates and charges is exempt from CEQA pursuant to California Public Resourc.~ Code S~---'fion 210800a)(8) and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the rates and charges are n<essary to maintain existing services wit. bin the TCSD. ,~I~J~I~ON 7. Th= $ecr~wy shsll c=~ify u~ ~ ~op~on of ~hi~ ~lufiom p~, ~PRO~ ~ ~O~ ~ 11~ ~y ofl~c, 1996. ~~ CO~ D~~ Ron~d H. Rob~, P~dent ATILT: [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS CITY OF TElVlM~ ) I, lune 6r~k, S~~ of :he T~m~la Communi~ S~.wic~ Dh~'i¢:, l:~-~=~y DO CERIIFI/' thai the foreloin~ l~solu~on No. C~D 96-0~ wa~ duly adopted al a regular m~finl of :he Board of D~c~ of the Tem~l~ Community $ervic~ Dimria on the 11th day of lune, 199~ b~ the following roll call vo~: AYES: 5 DIl~ECTORS: Birdsall, Ford, Robert~, Stone, Lindemarts NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None A~SENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSTAINED: 1 DIRECTORS: Stone (Service Level R O~y) ~' ltme S. Greek, CMC Secretary/City Clerk F'X'FFF~IT A PROJECT SUMMARY CO~ SERVICES DISTRICT On luly I, 199~, Murd l='man~,l Servic~ was r=min=[ by the City of Tem=:ula to prepar= th= Annual ~ ~'Tort for th= T=m~cuh Community Servic~ Dis=ict (TCSD) for th= Fhcal Year 1996-97. Pttrsuant to the Community Se. rvic'~ Law, Division 3 of Title 6 of the Govem~mt Code of the S~t~ of C. aliforni~, commencing with Section 61000 e,L.s~:~, the TCSD has the power to 1~vy and co11~ct rams and charges in order to carry on its operations and to provide the s='vic.-s and facfl/fies furnish~ by it. The levy and collection of the ~ and charges is m:complished by the assignment of :.b.en..~fit to ~ach parcel within a specific sc.wic~ level. A S~.,'vic~ L~vel is a defined area that provides a spedfie servic=, operation and'maintenancs and~or program to only thos~ parc~,ts contained within that s~vic= level. The TCSD is cum'~tty composed of six (6). city-wide servic~ l~vdm. Th~ descriptions of the s~rvic.- l~ve!s ~ as follows: 1. Community $e~c~s. ~P~rk~ arid Recreation. Operations, maintenance, and adminiswa~ion of the City community park syst~,'ns, re.~w. ation facilities, services and programs. 2. Service ~' eye! A - Arte,,-b, 1 ~treet ? i.~hts ~ud Medi~r~ Mainrescues. Ope~tions, m ;sinmnznce, u~ry costs, and adminisu-afion of all aner/al su:ee: I/ghrs, medians and ='a~c sisals. Serv~ T eve! ~ - Reside~riM S~,-ee~* T ~ghts. Oper~.tion$, maintenance, utiIky cosu and administration of all residenriaI s=~et lights. Service T.eve! C - Per~meter T ~udsc-apin.~ ,ud Slope Ma~nten~.uce. Operations, maintenance, ulility costs, improvemenm, and administration for all perime= landscaping and slol~ mainmnance arms maintained by the TCSD. ~ervice T eye! D - ReUse. Collection. Re~clin~ nnd Street Swc'~in~'. Opem~ons and adminisWarion of the refuse and recycling pingtarn, and su~et sweeping services for ~11 single-fmm~ly r~sidenfial homes. Service T evel R - Streets and Roads. Construction, installation, and maintenance of str~eU and roads. F. xhibit "D" TO: FROM: DATE: Shawn Nelson, Community Services Director David W. Hogan, Senior Plarmer(.:~~ September 19, 1996 SUBJECT: Determination that a Coif Course is a Commercial Use within the Open $pace/l~creation/Conservation Zoning Districts This memo shall serve to clm-~ Planning staff's determination that a golf course is considered a commercial use within the City's Open Space Zoning Desi~ation. Golf Courses are conditionally permitted witkin the PR (Parks and Recreation District) and the OS (Open Space District). According to Section 17.14.020 ~f the City's Development Code, "only facilities designed to complement the outdoor enjoyment may be considered as an accessory use to the park. No profit-making activities are intended for ~ district on more than a temporary basis. ' Section 1 ~. 14.0_,0,~of the Ciry's Development Code states: "the Parks and Recreation zoning distrio: is [htended to promote a wide range of public and private recreational uses in the community.. These uses include community facilities, golf courses, health clubs, public parks and recreation areas, sports parks, or other athletic facilities and similar outdoor commercial recreation uses." Staff interprets this section to mean that there are commercial open space uses and golf courses (for profit) fall into this category. I hope this information is helpful for understanding Staffs interp~tation of the Development Code for this matter. Please see me if you have any questions or comments. Chapter ~17.14 CITY OF TEMECULA ~ Development Chapter 17.14 OPEN SPACE/RECREATION/CONSERVATION ZONING DISTRICTS 17.14.010 Purpose and Intent The Open Spaee.~ecraation zoning dis~cts include both public and private areas of permanent open ~pace including local parks, golf courses, and floodways along Murrieta, Temecula, and Pechan~ Creeks. The Open $pace/P, ecr~ation Land Use Desi~ation on the Ganera] Plan is divided into thru, separate zoning districts as described below in Sect/on 17.14.020. The Open Space zoning districts include lands acquired by · exactiota easement. f~, and other methods sanctioned by State and Federal Law for parklan& preservation of natural msourcas and protection from natural hazards. 17.14.020 Open Space./Recreation Districts (a) Open Space District (OS) Passive Open Space The purpose of the Open Space zoning district is to provide for public open space areas which am set aside for low intensity, passive recreational purposes and related uses. The primary, uses within the Open Space zoning d/s~ct are passive recreational activities, such as trails, picnic areas, bicycle paths, and other non-intensive rec~ational activities. Only f~ilities designed to complement the outdoor enjoyment may be considered as an accessory use to the park. No profit-making activities at: intended for this zoning disu'ict on more than a temporary basis. Parks and Recreation District (PR) Recrem'i~nal Uses The Parks and Recreation zoning district is intended to promote a wide range of public and private recreational uses in the community. These uses include community facilities, golf courses, health clubs, public parks ._-...'i ..and recreation areas, sports parks, or other outdoor athletic facilities and similar outdoor commercial recreational uses. .... .:.-. (c) Conservation District (OS-C) ..;..c,t~-:--.-.-..--. The Conservation zonin_~ disu'ict is intended for those lands that should ' '" C17~ OF TEMECULA Dcv¢lopm~ra Cod~ 17.14.040 Development Startfiords The c~velopmem su~nd~r~ for ~he Open Spa~e zoning in~c~d on Table 17.1~b). Table 17.14(b) Open Space Development Standards - Open Space Development Standard ] PR I OS Minimum Lot Siz~ ] 20.000 sq. f',. ] - Maximum Lot Coverage ] 20% [ I0% Maximum HelOt I 35 fl. I 18 fl Floor Ar~-', Ratio [ .1 [ . I Setback'From Street R/W Line j 50 ft. I 50 fl. Setb~k From Adjoining Property. I.incs t 2.~ fl t 25 fl. Minimum Open Space / Landscasing ] 80% } 90% OS-C 100% 17.14.050 Special Use and Development Standards (a) Fences, Walls and Hedgez (1) Boundaries of any area wiritin the OS or OS-C zoning disu'ic:s sh~1I not be walled or fenced with solid material fencing or walls. Open rail fencing or hedges may be permitrod. Buildin~ or recreational facilities may be fenced or walled as follows: Game courts may be fenced or enclosed to prevent the escape of balls or similar re.'~reafional equipment to a limit of twelve (12) feet. bo Buildings may be surrounded by walls not to exceed six (6) feet in height. (2) Hedges may be used surrounding and thzoughout a park. (3) The height of a hedge which is used az a screen or barrier abutting right-of-way shall be Iimit~d to six (6) feet, except within ten (I0) feet of a driveway, where its height shall be limited to three (3) feet. (b) Minimum Open Space and Landscaping Open Space and Landscaping for the PtL, OS, and OS-C zoning districts ! Exhibit LEGEND HO I'£-. :':'" .:::. -"-' ' 'NOTE ilNI~FVEI,,OPADLE CAFEGOHY CONSIS ? S OF STEEP SLOPES AND FLOOD PLAINS. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HELD APRIL 22, 1997 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 7:40 PM at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairperson Steven J. Ford presiding. PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Ford ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and City Clerk/Agency Secretary June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMFNTS None given. CONSENT CA! FNDAR. Agency Member Stone stated he would abstain on Consent Calendar Item No. 2. It was moved by Agency Member Lindemans, seconded by Agency Member Birdsall, to approve Consent Calendar Items No. 1 and 2 as follows: 1 Minutes 1.1 AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 Approve the minutes of April 8, 1997. AGENCY MEMBERS: AGENCY MEMBERS: AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Ford None None Amendment to Ground I ease with Dual Develol~ment Inc. (Sixth and Front Street) 2.1 Approve the Second Amendment to Ground Lease by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and Dual Development, Inc.; 2.2 AYES: 4 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAIN: I Authorize the City Clerk to record the amendment. AGENCY MEMBERS: AGENCY MEMBERS: AGENCY MEMBERS: AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberts, Ford None None Stone Minutes.rda\042297 -1- AGENCY BUSINESS 3 Review and ADDroyal of 1996-97 Mid-Year Budgets Agency Member Stone stepped down due to a conflict of interest. Assistant Finance Director Tim McDermott presented the staff report. It was moved by Agency Member Linderoans, seconded by Agency Member Birdsall, to approve staff recommendation as follows: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 97-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGETS The motion was unanimously carried with Agency Member Stone abstaining. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT Executive Director Bradley reported the timeline for the creation of the Community Facilities District to build a Western Bypass is expiring without being activated, so that particular mechanism for use in the Redevelopment Agency will be going away at the end of the week. AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Agency Member Birdsall, seconded by Agency Member Lindemans, to adjourn at 7:43 PM to a meeting on May 13, 1997, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. ATTEST: Steven J. Ford, Chairperson June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk/Agency Secretary Minutes.rda\042297 -2- OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY HELD APRIL 22, 1997 A regular meeting of the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority was called to order at 7:43 PM at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairperson Karel F. Lindemans presiding. PRESENT: 5 ABSENT: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: Birdsall, Ford, Roberts, Lindemans, Stone BOARD MEMBERS: None Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson and Authority Secretary June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes It was moved by Board Member Birdsall, seconded by Board Member Ford, to approve Consent Calendar Item No. I as follows: 1.1 Approve the minutes of the meeting of April 8, 1997. The motion was unanimously carried. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Board Member Birdsall, seconded by Board Member Ford, to adjourn at 8:21 PM to a meeting on May 13, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. ATTEST: Karel F. Lindemans, Chairperson June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/Authority Secretary Minugs.fa\042297 -1- OLD TOWN WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE OLD TOWN WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY HELD APRIL 22, 1997 A regular meeting of the Old Town Westside Improvement Authority was called to order at 7:44 P.M. at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairperson Karel F. Lindemans presiding. PRESENT: 5 BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: Birdsall, Ford, Roberts, Lindemans, Stone None Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson and Authority Secretary June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Board Member Birdsall, seconded by Board Member Ford, to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. 1 Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of April 8, 1997. The motion was unanimously carried. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Board Member Stone, seconded by Board Member Ford, to adjourn at 7:45 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. ATTEST: Karel F. Lindemans, Chairperson June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/ Authority Secretary Minutes.ia\042297 -1 - ITEM 22 APPRClVAI CITY ATTORNEY [Vvw ~ . DIRECTOR OF I~N.ANCE_'~~"~" CITY MANAGE~/~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager May 13, 1997 TCI Cable PREPARED BY: Grant M. Yates, Assistant to the City Manager RECOMMENDATION: The City Council to receive and file this report. BACKGROUND: The City Council has invited TCl Cable to make a presentation to the City Council and general public to discuss pending rate increases, programming concerns and other issues that affect cable television in the City. TCI Cable has provided cable service to the residents of Temecula since they bought out Inland Valley Cablevision and assumed the Franchise Agreement in March of 1996. The City's Franchise Agreement with TCI, which expires in 2004, provides the City with the ability to regulate expanded basic cable rates only after they exceed the established ceiling of $34.33 per month. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ITEM 23 CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECT~31~~--,. CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 13, 1997 SUBJECT: Ordinance 97- Prima Facie Speed Limits on Certain Streets PREPARED BY: /~-'~Ali Moghadam, Associate Engineer - Capital Projects/Traffic RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE 97- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(d} OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FAClE SPEED LIMIT ON (1} MIRA LOMA DRIVE NORTH OF RANCHO VISTA ROAD (2) CABRILLO AVENUE BETWEEN JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND VALLEJO AVENUE BACKGROUND: The City received two (2) separate requests to establish speed limits on Mira Loma Drive and Cabrillo Avenue. Since these streets do not meet the requirements of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) for a residential street, engineering and traffic surveys were conducted to post speed limits on these roadways as shown on Exhibit "A". Section 40803 of the CVC states that in order to enforce posted speed limits using radar, an engineering and traffic survey must be conducted to establish a prima facie speed limit which is found most appropriate to facilitate a safe and orderly movement of traffic. An engineering and traffic survey as described in the CVC, is a survey of the prevailing speeds, accident records and roadway conditions not readily apparent to the drivers. The Public/Traffic Safety Commission has reviewed the new engineering and traffic surveys and recommended that the City Council amend Section 10.28.010(d) of the Temecula Municipal Code to establish new speed limits as shown on Exhibit "A". -I- r:~agdrpt\97~0513 \spdlimit.ord/ajp FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in Public Works Signs Account No. 001-164-602-5244 and Striping/Stenciling Account No. 001-164-602-5410. Attachments: 1. Exhibit "A" - Affected Roadway Segments 2. Ordinance 97- 3. Exhibit "B", Location Maps -2- r:Lagdrpt\97X0513\spdlirnit.ord/ajp EXHIBIT "Name of Street and Portion Affected Mira Loma Drive North of Rancho Vista Declared Prima Facie Sl~eed Limit. Miles Per Hour 30 * Cabrillo Avenue between Jedediah Smith Road and Vallejo Avenue 35 * * First Time Speed Survey -3- r:~agdrpt\97~0513 \spdlimit.ord/ajp ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AIVIFNDING SECTION 10.28.010(d) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT ON (1) MIRA LOMA DRIVE NORTH OF RANCHO VISTA ROAD (2) CABRILLO AVENUE BETWEEN JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND VALLEJO AVENUE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The City of Temecula finds and determines that from time to time it is necessary to add or modify existing prima facie speed limits within the City for certain streets, or parts of streets. WHEREAS, the City conducts engineering and traffic surveys on its roadways in order to determine the appropriate speed limit; WHEREAS, the engineering and traffic surveys on the segments of roadways designated in this Ordinance were conducted to establish speed limits which are appropriate for these roadways. SECTION 1. Section 10.28.010(d) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows to modify the declared prima facie speed limits only on the following streets: "Name of Street and Portion Affected Declared Prima Facie Speed l.imit, Miles Per Hour Mira Loma Drive North of Rancho Vista Road 30 Cabrillo Avenue between Jedediah Smith Road and Vallejo Avenue 35 Except as specifically set forth in this Section 1, all other provisions of Section 10.28.010(d) shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 2. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. r:\agdmt\97\0513\mdlimit.ord/aiv SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places. SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City Councilmembers voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City. PASSED APPROVED AND ADOPTEI~ this day of , 1997. ATTEST: Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 97-~ was dully introduced and placed ~ its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 13th day of May, 1997, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 27th day of May, 1997, by the following vote: 0 COUNCILIvtF~MBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMI=~MBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk r:\agdrpt\97X0513\spdlimit.ord/aip D~:£PWOOD C~ ,/ ~T G: P~ I / 2 GU, M~L.UP(: CT 3 ~N~ ~ COPP[.qK[CH I) / ~--~_ LOCATION MAP ~LOCATION MAP / / f ITEM 24 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council Mayor Pro Tem Roberts May 13, 1997 Proposed Reorganization of RCTC APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER~ RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ENDORSING THE REORGANIZATION OF THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum regarding Proposed Communication to Joint Agencies RESOLIY~ON NO. ~7- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TI~IECULA ENDORSING THE REORGANIZATION OF THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("RCTC") is a statutory transportation commission created by the State Leo~.qlature in 1976 to serve Riverside County; and WHEREAS, the power of the Riverside County Transportalton Commission is currently exercised by a seven (7) voting member Board of Directors; and WHEREAS, this City Council has determined that it is in the best interests of the City of Temecula in particular, and of the County of Riverside in general, that the voting membership of the Riverside County Transportation Commission should be expanded to include one voting member from each city within the County and each member of the Board of Supervisors. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Temecula City Council hereby endorses the reorganization of the Riverside 'County Transportation Commission to include each city in the County and each member of the Board of Supervisors as a voting member on RCTC. In addition, the governor's appointee shall remain as a non-voting ex-officio member of the Commission. Section 2. The City Council supports the introduction of legislation which would expand the membership and establish voting and quorum rights, among other things, as set forth in the attached Exhibit "A". Section 3. The City Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this resolution to the Riverside County Transportation Commission for presentation to the State Legislature. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27th day of May, 1997. ATr~T: Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 9%__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 27th day of May, 1997 by the following vote, to wit: COUNCIL~E-RS: NOES: COUNCIL~MBERS: COUNCILM~_MBF~S: June $. Greek, CMC City Clerk EXHIBIT A RIVERSIDE Banning Beaumont Blythe Calimesa Canyon Lake Cathedral City Coachella Corona Desert Hot Springs Hernet Indian Wells Indio Lake Elsinore La Quinta Moreno Valley Mumeta Norco Palm Desert Palm Springs Pen-is Rancho Mirage Riverside San Jacinto Temecula Unincorporated Votes Ea. Superr. POPULATION 23,850 10,450 18,350 7,300 11,300 35,450 21,050 99,500 14,850 52,600 3,080 42,100 18,050 133,400 34,550 24,500 33,450 41,700 30,500 10,550 243,400 23,900 41,850 380,500 VOTES 32,915 14,422 25,324 10,074 15,595 48,923 29,050 137,316 20,494 72,591 4,251 58,101 35,330 24,910 184,101 47,681 33,812 46,163 57,549 42,092 14,560 335,908 32,984 57,756 276,380 % OF ALL VOTES 1.2% 0.5% 0.9% 0.4% 0.6% 1.8% 1.1% 5.0% 0.7% 2.6% 0.2% 2.1% 1.3% 0.9% 6.7% 1.7% 1.2% 1.7% 2.1% 1.5% 0.5% 12.2% 1.2% 2.1% 10.0% Tot. Incorp. Pop. Total Population 1,001,330 1,381,900 Total Votes (Cities) Total Votes (Super.) 1,381,900 1,381,900 r Aresos\ 135.art 1480 TERRACITA DRIVE · SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92404 · (909) 886-7408 · FAx (909) 886-7529 MOBI~ (909) 317-7744 · E-MAIL: mcdcon @ix.netcom.com MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: May 2, 1997 Joint Committee Members Wes McDaniel Subj: Proposed Communication to Joint Agencies As we discussed Wednesday, we will send a communication to each of the three agencies regarding our conclusions and the proposed actions. The three agencies will each discuss and take action, and will oversee gaining individual city concurrence. In the meantime, we will draft actual statutory language, circulate it to you for approval, and seek a bill author (to insert in an existing bill). Attached is a proposed cover memo, a possible Council Resolution, and a briefing (hopefully in clear language) of the proposal, for the Committee members' approval. Time is of the essence; WRCOG meets on Monday, May 5 and the CVAG Technical (City Manager's) Committee on May 9, and we need to have this out by Friday. Please review immediately and let me know of any concern. In the absence of a call, I will assume it's OK. Schedule of meetings: WRCOG Board CVAG Technical Com: CVAG Board RCTC Commission Board of Supervisors Monday, May 5 (to be hand-carried to meeting under existing agenda item) Wed, May 9 (agenda goes out Friday morn, May 2) June 2 May 13 by May 15 "Qualit), Services Specializing In Regiona~ Transportation, and Intergovernmental Agencies; Public.Private Ventures; City Governments" 1480 TERRACITA DRIVE: SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92404 · (909) 886-7408 · FAX (909) $86-7529 MOm~.E (909) 317-7744 · E-M^JL: mcdcon @ix.netcom.com MEMORANDUM Date: May 2, 1997 To~ Riverside County Transportation Commission Coachella Valley Association of Governments Western Riverside Council of Governments Wes McDaniel, Consultant Subj: Joint Committee Recommendations It's time to declare success! The nine member joint committee, at its second meeting held yesterday at Banning City Hall, arrived at a very clear consensus and unanimously approved the proposal contained on the attached page. It now goes to the three agencies, and through them to the respective cities (and also separately to the Board of Supervisors) for consideration and approval. In short, the proposal expands RCTC to full membership: all 24 cities and all 5 members of the Board of Supervisors (the public member is dropped). There are no functional changes, although there may over time be a desire to expand the subject matter which RCTC engages in, even to items beyond transportation. It provides 100% access and participation in RCTC, which is a goal the cities strongly sought. Related to the RCTC expansion was the need to deal with the questions of membership, quorums, and voting.. The proposal handles each of these needs, including a very unique (within the state) form of proportional voting which can be exercised in extraordinary circumstances. Again, it should be noted that all committee members, city and county, had a well informed dialogue on these provisions, felt quite satisfied with the results which were hammered out, and unanimously approved them. At both this and the initial Committee meeting, there was some concern over the complexities of operating with a 29 member Board. However, these worries were substantially allayed by the successful track record of SANBAG (29 members) and SCAG (71 members). It was acknowledged that a more active committee system would probably need to be developed. And any downsides of the larger size must be measured against the clear gain of everybody have dir~_ct participation. "Quality Services Specializing In Regional, Transportation, and Intergovernmental Agencies; Public.Private Ventures; City Governments" The proposal does not deal with the two COGs. The committee decided to stick with the main event - expanding RCTC - and let the COG relationships follow their own evolution. There does not at this point seem to be a consensus to return to the subject of ironing out the COG - RCTC status, functions, and relationships. This subject will simply have to run its course ....much more of a WRCOG issue than a CVAG one. Also, essentially by tacit omission, no proposals are advanced which could lead to a ~eater separatist role for CVAG in the transportation arena. Over time, within the context of the expanded RCTC, new relationships could be developed and enacted by internal agreement. It was agreed that each of the three agencies would consider and approve the proposal, and work to have it also reviewed and at least tacitly approved by each city. There would not need to be a formal action or Resolution of approval, but there should at least be no objection. A draft Resolution is included for those who may wish to use it. In the meantime, we will put it into bill form, circulate that again for review, and seek an author to amend it into an existing bill. Barring an urgency clause, and presuming successful passage this legislative session, the new RCTC would become effective January 1, 1998. The Committee does not intend to meet again unless it becomes necessary, nor is there a plan to call another all-cities meeting. Using the three agencies accomplishes the same objective. Please contact me for questions or further discussion. itcover501 PROPOSED REORGANIZATION OF RCTC Membership Membership on RCTC Would be expanded to provide one seat to each city within the County and one seat to each member of the Board of Supervisors. In addition, the Governor's appointee would remain as an ex-officio non-voting member of RCTC. Currently, that means RCTC would have 24 city seats, 5 Board of Supervisors seats and 1 ex-officio non-voting member, for a total of 30 members. The current position of a public member would be eliminated. Each City Council could appoint one regular voting member and up to 4 alternates to attend RCTC board meetings. The regular member and all alternates must be either the Mayor or a member of the city council. Each member of the Board of Supervisors would be a regular voting member of RCTC. In addition, each supervisor member could, if absent from a Board meeting, authorize another member of the Board of Supervisors to cast his or her votes. Any such authorization must be in writing and would be effective only for one meeting. Voting Rights 1. Unweighted Voting. Under normal procedures, each member present would have one vote. Under current conditions, this would provide the city representatives collectively with 24 votes and the county representatives with 5 votes. Unless a weighted vote is called (as set forth below), any action item would carry ifa majority vote of the members present at the, meeting vote in favor of the action. RV!mJB~ CD'~. 1903 2. Weighted Voting. Any voting member could call for a weighted vote on any issue. When a weighted vote is called, the county members collectively and the citv members collectively shall have equal votes based upon total county population. The votes would be assigned as follows: a. City Votes. City votes shall be assigned to each city member based on the percentage of the incorporated population within each city. votes. County Votes. Each supervisor shall be assigned one-fifth of the county Results cast. An action would be declared approved when it has received a majority of the total votes Population Population data would be determined through State Department of Finance estimates, which shall be adjusted annually. A quorum of RCTC shall be achieved when a majority of the jurisdictions represented on RCTC are present at the meeting. Currently there would be 25 jurisdictions (24 cities and the county) represented on RCTC. Thus, a quorum would be 13 members. R%?UB~SCD~2190~ ITEM 25 APPROV~, CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council City Manager ~ May 13, 1997 Development Impact Fees PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Allie Kuhns, Senior Management Analyst That the City Council: Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 15 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER ENTITLED 'PUBUC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE' Adopt the following resolution pertaining to the DIF Ordinance: RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING AND IMPOSING A PUBLIC FACIUTIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE DISCUSSION: At the City Council Meeting/Workshop on Thursday, May 8, 1997, the development community was afforded an opportunity to provide further testimony concerning development impact fees (DIF) for Council consideration. During this meeting, Council reviewed and responded to all issues which had been raised by the developers at the April 8th Public Hearing, and discussed the remaining issues which the Council had with respect to the proposed fees. By the conclusion of the Meeting, Council had agreed to the following: That the Sphere of Influence should not be included in the fee calculations (note: the removal of the Sphere of Influence decreased the maximum residential fees to ~2,851 from $2,934 per detached unit and to $2,061 from $2, 114 per attached unit); That the residential fee should be adopted at 100% of the maximum fee recommended in the Study; and, That the non-residential fees should be adopted at the 60% of the maximum fee level recommended by Staff, but phased in over seven years per the following percentages: FISCAL YEAR PERCENTAGE OF 60% MAXIMUM FEE RECOMMENDED BY STAFF 1997 1998 1999 200O 2001 2002 20O3 2O04 ~98 60% r99 70% ~00 80% ~01 90% r02 100% ~03 110% ~04 120% '05 130% NOTE: The fees will be adjusted as of July 1st of each year. However, prior to the fees being implemented for any new fiscal year, Staff will provide an analysis of development which has occurred and fees which have been collected to determine if the new year's fees are appropriate. Due to the changes in the DIF Ordinance and Resolution necessitated by the evening's discussions, the reading of the ordinance was continued until the May 13th Meeting, and is presented with the resolution adopting the fees at this time. FISCAL IMPACT: According to the Development Impact Fee Study conducted by David M. Griffith & Associates, $210 million will be required to construct the Cit¥'s capital improvements necessitated by new development through build out. Any fees adopted at less than 100% of the DMG maximum calculated fees will result in the need to identify other funding sources for these improvements. All DIF projections by Staff are based on a five year cycle, since the City's Capital Improvement Program is a five year program cycle, and DIF must be reevaluated every three to five years. Attachments: 1. Ordinance No. 97- 2. Resolution No. 97- ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING Till.I;'. 15 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER ENTITLED "PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE" THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding thereto a new Chapter 15.06 to read as follows: "Chapter 15.06 Public Facilities Development Irapact Fee 15.06.010 Findings and Intent. A. The City Council finds that Temecula is a rapidly growing City. The City's population has the potential to grow from a current population of about 40,000 to over 200,000 at build out. This increase in population is reasonably expected to create a substantial increase in the demand placed upon public facilities. The City's existing public facilities will soon become inadequate to handle the projected population growth at existing levels of service. In order to serve the projected population growth, public facilities must be expanded. B. It is the intent of the City to require every person who develops land to mitigate the impacts of that development on the City's public facilities. The City will therefore require developers to pay a public facilities development impact fee that will be used to meet the demand for public facilities caused by development. The public facilities will be constructed in accordance with a capital improvement plan adopted by resolution of the City Council. C. The amount of the public facilities development impact fees collected pursuant to this Chapter shall be limited to the cost of public facilities attributable to new development. The amount of the public facilities development impact fees collected shall not include the cost of public facilities that serve existing development. 15.06.020 Residential Public Facilities Development ln~)act Fee Required. A. Except as provided in Sections 15.06.040 and 15.06.050, a developer shall pay a public facilities development impact fee for each building which is part of a residential development, in an amount established by resolution of the City Council, upon final inspection for that building, or the date the certificate of occupancy is issued for that building, whichever 970509 11086-00078 rdw 1101782 0 occurs first; provided, however, that if a residential development contains more than one dwelling, the Director of Corntotality Development may determine whether the fees or charges shall be paid on a pro rata basis for each dwelling when it receives its final inspection or certificate of occupancy, whichever occurs first; on a pro rata basis when a certain percentage of the dwellings have received their final inspection or certificate of occupancy, whichever occurs first; or on a lump-stun basis when the first dwelling in the development receives its final inspection or certificate of occupancy, whichever occurs first. If the required fee is not fully paid prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any portion of the residential development encumbered thereby, the Director of Community Development may require the property owner, or lessee if the lessee's interest appears of record, as a condition of issuance of the building permit, to execute a contract to pay the fee or charge, or applicable portion thereof, within the time specified above. The contract shall be recorded with the Riverside County Recorder and shall constitute a lien for the payment of the fee. B. For purposes of this Section, "final inspection" or "certificate of occupancy," shall be defined as that term is defined in Government Code Section 66007, as amended. Required. 15.06.030 Non-Residential Public Facilities Development lnlpact Fee A. Except as provided in Sections 15.06.040 and 15.06.050, a developer shall pay a public facilities development impact fee for each building in a non-residential development, in an amount established by resolution of the City Council, prior to issuance of a building permit for that building. B. Notwithstanding paragraph A of this Section, a building permit may be issued to a developer prior to payment of a public facilities development fee, if the developer qualifies as a nonprofit organization that is exempted from taxes by Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. If, pursuant to this paragraph, the required fee is not fully paid prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any portion of the non- residential development encumbered thereby, the Director of Community Development may require the property owner, or lessee if the lessee's interest appears of record, as a condition of issuance of the building permit, to execute a contract to pay the fee or charge, or applicable portion thereof, upon transfer of the non-residential development, or the applicable portion thereof, to a purchaser that does not qualify as a nonprofit organization that is exempted from taxes by Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The contract shall be recorded with the Riverside County Recorder and shall constitute a lien for the payment of the fee. 15.06.040 Developer Construction of Public Facilities Pursuant to Capital Improvement Plan. 970509 11086410078 rdw 11017820 - 2 - A. A developer shall be entitled to a reduction in the amount of the public facilities development impact fee required by Sections 15.06.020 and 15.06.030, if the developer constructs public facilities pursuant to the City's Capital Improvement Plan. The public facilities development impact fee shall be reduced by the amount of engineering and construction costs that would be reasonably incurred by the City in building those same public facilities. The amount of the reduction in the public facilities development impact fee shall be subject to approval by the Director of Community Development prior to construction of the development. B. If a developer constructs public facilities pursuant to the City's Capital Improvement Plan, and if the City's engineering and construction costs to construct those same public facilities would have been more than the public facilities development impact fee assessed to that developer pursuant to Sections 15.06.020 and 15.06.030, then nothing in this Section shall prevent the City from entering into a reimbursement agreement with that developer, subject to the availability of funds. 15.06.050 Fee Reduction. A. Application for Fee Reduction Any developer whose development is subject to the public facilities development impact fee required by this Chapter may apply to the Director of Community Development for a reduction in that fee based upon the demonstrable absence of a reasonable relationship between the impact of that development on the City's public facilities and either the amount of public facilities development impact fee charged, or the type of public facilities improvements to be constructed and purchased. The application shall be made in writing and filed with the Director of Community Development no later than ninety days after approval of the development. If no application for discretionary review is required for the development, then the application shall be made in writing and fried within ninety days after the City issues a building permit for the development. The application shall state in detail the factual basis for the request for reduction. Failure to file a timely application for reduction deprives the Director of jurisdiction to consider the application. The Director shall make a decision on the application for reduction within thirty calendar days after the application has been filed. Notice of the Director' s decision shall be mailed to the applicant, postage paid. B. Appeal from Director's Decision 1. Any decision of the Director of Community Development under Section 15.060.050.A may be appealed to the Planning Commission by filing an application for appeal with the Director of Community Development. The application must be filed within fifteen calendar days after notice of the Director's decision has been mailed to the applicant; provided, however, that if the fifteen days expire on a day when Temecula City Hall is not open for business, then the appeal period shall be extended to the next business day. 970509 110~M10078 rdw 1101782 0 3 2. Failure to file a timely appeal application deprives the Planning Commission of jurisdiction to hear the appeal. 3. The Planning Commission shall consider the appeal at a public hearing to be held within forty-five calendar days after the appeal application is C. Appeal from Commission's Decision 1. The decision of the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 15.06.050.B may be appealed to the City Council by filing an application for appeal with the City Clerk. The application must be filed within fifteen calendar days after the Commission has made a final decision on the appeal; provided, however, that if the fifteen days expire on a day when Temecula City Hall is not open for business, then the appeal period shall be extended to the next business day. 2. Failure to file a timely appeal application deprives the City Council of jurisdiction to hear the appeal. 3. The City Council shall consider the appeal at a public hearing to be held within forty-five calendar days after the appeal application is fried. The decision of the City Council shall be final. D. Invalidation of Fee Reduction If a reduction is granted pursuant to this Section, any subsequent change in the design of the subject development which may impact its potential use, or any increase in the square footage of the development, shall invalidate the reduction. E. Processing of Protests The procedure set forth in this Section shall implement Government Code Section 66020, or its successor, and shall serve as the City's method for processing protests filed pursuant to that section. Prior to the effective date of the approval of the development, or, if no discretionary approval is required, prior to the issuance of a building permit, a developer that is subject to this Chapter shall sign a statement acknowledging the imposition of a public facilities development impact fee upon that developer's development. Such acknowledgement shall not be deemed a waiver of the developer's right to protest the imposition and to request a fee adjustment pursuant to this Section. 15.06.060 Use of Funds. All public facilities development impact fees paid and collected pursuant to this Chapter shall be placed in one or more funds and used solely for the purpose of constructing, 970509 11086-00078 rdw 1101782 0 - 4 - expanding, or rehabilitating the public facilities specified in the resolution establishing the fee and described in the City's Capital Improvement Plan. 15.06.070 Calculation of Fees. A developer subject to the public facilities development impact fee required by Sections 15.06.020 and 15.06.030 shall pay the amount of the fee in effect at the time that the fee becomes due. Furthermore, any fee imposed on a development which is protected by vested rights acquired through a vesting tentative subdivision map shall pay the amount of the fee in effect at the time the rights became vested plus any adjustment for inflation made between that date and the date the fee becomes due." Section 2. Developments for which a development entitlement application was deemed complete prior to the introduction of this Ordinance shall be exempt from the requirements of this Ordinance; provided, however, that this exemption shall not override any condition of approval for a project which specifically requires payment of fees for the purposes of mitigating impacts on public facilities. Section 3. Ordinance 659 of the County of Riverside establishing a Development Mitigation Fee for residential development as adopted by reference by the City of Temecula shall not apply to any development subject to the public facilities development impact fee required by this Ordinance. Section 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of the Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one of more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance and shall cause same to be published as required by law. 970509 110~6-00078 rdw 1101782 0 - 5 - PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of , 1997. Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk 97050911086-00078rdw 11017820 - 6 - RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING AND IMPOSING A PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Short Title. This resolution may be referred to as the "Public Facilities Development Impact Fee Resolution" of the City of Temecula. Section 2. Purpose. The purpose of this resolution is to establish the amount of the public facilities development impact fee and to establish certain standards for the administration of such fees. Section 3. Findin_os. The City Council, after review of the City of Temecula Development Impact Fee Study (the "DIF Study") dated January 8, 1996 and prepared by David M. Griffith & Associates, Ltd., and after review of additional staff reports, and testimony and information received at a noticed public hearing on this matter, makes the following fmdings: A. Based upon the land uses permitted by the City's General Plan and growth trends of actual development within the City, the City anticipates that 54,422 dwelling units and 55.526 million square feet of non-residential development will be developed in the City between 1995 and buildout. B. The DIF Study analyzes the demand expected to be generated by future development for street system, park and recreation, corporate, fire protection, and library facilities. Based on this analysis, the D~F Study contains estimated levels of service for street system, park and recreation, corporate, fire protection, and library facilities that are necessary to serve anticipated development within the City of Temecula through buildout. C. Present and future sources of Federal, State, County and City revenues are insufficient to fund construction of the street system, park and recreation, corporate, fire protection, and library facilities needed to accommodate the demands of_anticipated residential and non-residential development. D. The only fair and equitable method of securing adequate revenue necessary to fund the construction of these facilities is through a fee based on the extent to which new development generates additional demand for street system, park and recreation, corporate, fire protection, and library facilities. The fee amounts established in this resolution pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code are based on the DIF Study. 970509 11086-00078 rdw 1101783 0 E. The purpose of the public facilities development impact fee will be to provide street system, park and recreation, corporate, fire protection, and library facilities in an amount sufficient to meet the estimated demand created by residential and non-residential development constructed in the City through buildout. F. The public facilities development impact fee will be used to finance the public facilities listed in the City's Capital Improvement Plan. G. There is a reasonable relationship between the need for a public facilities development impact fee and the construction of residential and non-residential development projects because the construction of these development projects creates a demand for street system, park and recreation, corporate, fire protection, and library facilities to serve the needs of the residents and occupants of these development projects. Such facilities are necessary to facilitate ingress to and egress from each development project, to provide necessary amenities to the residents and occupants of each development project, and to protect the structures constructed as part of each development project. H. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the public facilities development impact fee and the construction of residential and non-residential development projects because, as a result of the fees' use as described in subsection F, residents and occupants of such development projects will be served by the street system, park and recreation, corporate, fire protection, and library facilities that will be financed by the fees. I. There is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the public facilities development impact fee and the portion of the total cost of street system, park and recreation, corporate, ftre protection, and library facilities attributed to each development project because the amount of the public facilities development impact fee was carefully calculated so that the estimated share of the total cost of the facilities assessed to a development project would equal the estimated share of the total demand for the facilities generated by that development project. The general methodology for apportioning the total cost of facilities, and the method for calculating the portion of the total cost of facilities attributed to each development project is described in the DIF Study, which is incorporated herein by reference. Section 4. Amount of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee. The public facilities development impact fee is hereby established and imposed in the amounts set forth in Exhibit A to this resolution. Section 5. Automatic Adjustments in Amount of Fees for Residential Development. Commencing on January 1, 1998, the fees as established and imposed by this resolution shall be adjusted on January 1 of each year based upon the Dodge Building Cost Index (the "BCI") for the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area (BCI) unless the fees are othewvise adjusted as part of an update of the City's Capital Improvement Plan. The Director of Finance shall compute the percentage difference between the BCI on July 1 of each year and the BCI for the previous July 1. The Director of Finance shall then adjust by such percentage the fees 970509 11086-00078 rdw 1101783 0 2 established and imposed by this resolution. The adjusted amounts shall be rounded to the nearest dollar, and shall be submitted to the City Council for consideration at a public hearing. Upon adoption by the City Council, the adjusted amounts shall become effective on the following January 1. These amounts shall constitute the fees authorized by Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and established and imposed by this resolution. Should the BCI be revised or discontinued, the Director of Finance shall use the revised index or a comparable index, as approved by the City Council, for determining fluctuations in the cost of development. Section 6. Automatic A0justments in Amount of Fees for Non-Residential Development. Commencing on July 1, 1998, and on each succeeding July 1 until July 1, 2003, the fees as established and imposed by this resolution for non-residential development shall be increased in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit B to this resolution. The adjusted amounts shall be presented to the City Council for review at a public hearing. These adjusted amounts shall constitute the fees authorized by Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and established and imposed by this resolution. ,gection 7. Effective Date. The fees established pursuant to Section 4 of this Resolution shall become effective 60 days following the adoption of Ordinance No. 97-_. Section 8. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this resolution is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of the resolution. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this resolution, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one of more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this ~ day of , 1997. ATTEST: Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk 970509 110~M~078 rdw 1101783 0 3 EXHIBIT A PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES Component Type of ! and Use1/ Amount of Fee Per Unit~ Street System Improvements Residential (Attached) Residential (Detached) Office Retail Commercial Service Commercial Business Park $475 $678 $0.634 $1.952 $0.976 $0.463 Traffic Signals and Traffic Control Systems Residential (Attached) Residential (Detached) Office Retail Commercial Service Commercial Business Park $77 $109 $0.103 $0.316 $0.158 $0.075 Corporate Facilities Residential (Attached) Residential (Detached) Office Retail Commercial Service Commercial Business Park $102 $190 $0.031 $0.077 $0.043 $0.025 Fire Protection Facilities Residential (Attached) Residential (Detached) Office Retail Commercial Service Commercial Business Park $42 $55 $0.010 $0.017 $0.014 $0.012 Park and Recreation Improvements Residential (Attached) Residential (Detached) Office Retail Commercial Service Commercial Business Park $1,209 $1,611 $o 1/ Land use is determined based on the categories in the Land Use Element of the Temecula General Plan. 2/ Fees for residential developmere are calculated per dwelling unit. Fees for non-residential development are calculated per 1,000 square feet of gross building area. 970509 11086-00078 rdw 1101783 0 - 4 - Component Type of I and Use3~ Amo. nt of Fee Per Unit~/ Libraries Residential (Attached) Residential (Detached) Office Retail Commercial Service Commercial Business Park $156 $208 $o $o $o TOTAl, I)EWJ,OPMENT Residential (Attached) IMPACT FEE PER Residential (Detached) LINIT~/ Office Retail Commercial Service Commercial Business Park $2,851 $2,061 $0.778 $2.362 $1.191 $0.575 3/ Land use is determined based on the categories in the Land Use Element of the Temecula General Plan. l/ Fees for residential development are calculated per dwelling unit. Fees for non-residential development are calculated per 1,000 square feet of gross building area. 970509 11086-00078 rdw 11017830 - 5 - EXHIBIT B PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STREET SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS BASE FEE* 1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 RESIDENTIAL DETACHED 678 RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED 475 678 678 678 678 678 678 678 475 475 475 475 475 475 475 NON-RESIDENTIAL (60%) OFFICE 1.057 0.634 RETAIL COMM 3.253 1.952 SERVICE COMM 1.627 0.976 BUS PARK/IND 0.772 0.463 (70%) (80%) (90%) (100%) (110%) (120%) 0.740 0.846 0.951 1.057 1.163 1.268 2.277 2.602 2.928 3.253 3.578 3.904 1.139 1.302 1.464 1.627 1.790 1.952 0.540 0.618 0.695 0.772 0.849 0.926 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS BASE FEE* 1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 RESIDENTIAL DETACHED 109 RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED 77 109 109 109 109 109 109 109 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 NON-RESIDENTIAL (60%) (70%) (80%) (90%) (100%) (110%) (120%) OFFICE 0.171 0.103 0.120 0.137 0.154 0.171 0.188 0.205 RETAIL COMM 0.527 0.316 0.369 0.422 0.474 0.527 0.580 0.632 SERVICE COMM 0.263 0.158 0.184 0.210 0.237 0.263 0.289 0.316 BUS PARK/IND 0.125 0.075 0.088 0.100 0.113 0.125 0.138 0.150 CORPORATE FACILITIES BASE FEE* 1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 RESIDENTIAL DETACHED RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED 2002/03 2003/04 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 NON-RESIDENTIAL (60%) (70%) (80%) (90%) (100%) (110%) (120%) OFFICE 0.051 0.031 0.036 0.041 0.046 0.051 0.056 0.061 RETAIL COMM 0.128 0.077 0.090 0.102 0.115 0.128 0.141 0.154 SERVICE COMM 0.072 0.043 0.050 0.057 0.064 0.072 0.079 0.086 BUS PARK/IND 0.042 0.025 0.029 0.034 0.038 0.042 0.046 0.050 * Base fee is 60% of the maximum fee calculated in the Development Impact Fee Study conducted by DaWd M. Griffith & Associates, Inc. r:\ku hnsa\difikare11\o. wb2 12-May-97 FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES BASE FEE* RESIDEN'IZ~ DETACHED RESIDENTIAL A'I'rACHED 1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 55 55 42 42 NON-RESIDENTIAL (60%) 'OFFICE 0.017 0.010 RETAIL COMM 0.028 0.017 SERVICE COMM 0.023 0.014 BUS PARK/IND 0.020 0.012 55 55 55 55 42 42 42 42 (70%) (80%) (90%) (100%) (110%) 0.012 0.014 0.015 0.017 0.019 0.020 0.022 0.025 0.028 0.031 0.016 0.018 0.021 0.023 0.025 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.020 0.022 PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENTS BASE FEE* 1997/98 RESIDENTIAL DETACHED 1,611 1,611 RESIDENTIAL ATrACHED 1,209 1,209 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 1,611 1,611 1,611 1,611 1,611 1,209 1,209 1,209 1,209 1,209 NON-RESIDENTIAL OFFICE 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 RETAIL COMM 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 SERVICE COMM 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 BUS PARK/IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 LIBRARIES BASE FEE* 1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 RESIDENTIAL DETACHED RESIDENTIAL ATrACHED 208 208 208 208 208 208 156 156 156 156 156 156 2002/03 NON-RESIDENTIAL OFFICE 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 RETAIL COMM 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 SERVICE COMM 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 BUS PARK/IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 * Base/be is 60% of the maximum fie calculated in the Development Impact Fee Study conducted by David M. Griffith & Associates, Inc. r:\kuhnsa\di~kare11\o.wb2