HomeMy WebLinkAbout020592 CC/PC Jnt. AgendaAGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
AN ADJiOURNED REGULAR MEETING
TO BE HELD JOINTLY WITH THE TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
TEMECULA CITY HALL, MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43174 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
FEBRUARY 5, 1992 - 7:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER:
Flag Salute:
ROLL CALL:
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mayor Patricia H. Birdsall
Chairman John Hoagland
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks
Birdsall
Blair, Chiniaeff, Fahey, Ford, Hoagland
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council
on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are
limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item
not listed on the Agenda or on the consent Calendar, a pink "Request To Speak" form
should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all other agenda items a "Request To Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
2
21~gendell 01091
General Plan ProQress Report
Presentation by Jim Ragsdale, The Planning Center
Presentation of Alternative Urban Form Concepts
Randy Jackson of The Planning Center will present a slide show that examines the
opportunities within Temecula to establish a coherent structure for future growth and
development.
02/04/82
3
4
Discussion of Urban Forms Concepts
Planning Commission and City Council will discuss and evaluate urban
alternatives
Policy Regardino Change of Zones While General Plan Proclram is in Progress
Review of Next Joint City Council/Planning Commission Workshop
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
form
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular City Council meeting: February 11,
Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
1992, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community
2legends/101091 2 02/04/92
The City of
TEMECULA
Issue Papers
January 24, 1992 ·
:'. - .' .' ~: ~ ~: ~ '~ ' :~*. ' . :' ' , ....!~-: ' ......: .:'-'.' '.'d:Z ...."**
':'-.::...!: ~ ... .... "~ : ~ ;,: :_.- ,.' :, ;.~ . ':r.:;, ;,.-.:::,:.
THE PLANNING CENTER
MEMORANDUM
Date,
1/24/92
From,
Subject,
Gary Thornhill and John Meyer
Jim Ragsdale
General Plan Issue Papers
1300 DOVE STREET
SUITE 100
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660
(714) 851-9444
The' TemecuXa General PIn Team has prepared a'series of issue;~,a~e~-t~:focus
the attention of City officials on kc3/issues that affect the well being of the
community. The issue topics selected involve an existing or potential condition
in the General Plan Study area that require an action to be taken by the City.
The issue topics are as follows:
· Urban Form and Design
· Economic Development and Balanced Land Uses
· Circulation and Traffic Congestion
· The Open Space System
· Planning & Research
· Computer Services & GIS
· Environmental Studies
· Governmental Services
& Policy Planning
, Landscape Architecture
· Resource Management
· Urban Design
· Residential Density Mix and Distribution
· Assuring Fiscal Viability
· Flood Control Facilities
· Regional Planning and Implementation
Each Issue Paper includes a statement of the issue; a definition of its scope; a
brief background description; an identification of the interests involved;
alternative approaches to addressing the issue; the impli. cations of each option;
and recommended strategies.
Offices In:
Newport Beach, CA
Bakersfield, CA
Heepeda, CA
Sacramento, CA
Phoenlx, AZ
Tucson, AZ
The Issue Papers am intended to be used as a planning and decision making tool
throughout the remainder of the general plan process. Policies and
implementation measures will be developed or refined based on the action(s) to
be taken by the City. The Preferred Land Use and Circulation Plan will include
the concepts or approach to future growth and development generated from the
Issue Papers. The information and direction gained from the Issue Papers will
be incorporated into the elements of the General Plan.
These Issue Papers will provide the focus for discussions at the upcoming joint
PC/CC workshops.
TEM-01~IP-MEMO
CITY OF ~CU'LA General Plan Program
Tc ble of Contents
Issue Paper on Form and Design ........................................ 1
Issue Paper on Economic Development and Balanced Land Uses ................. 6
Issue Paper on Circulation and Traffic Congestion ...................
Issue Pa~r on the Open Space System .................................... 17
Issue Paper on Residential Density Mix and Distribution ....................... 21
Issue Paper on Assuring Fiscal Viability ................................... 25
Issue Paper on Rood Control Facilities ................................... 29
Issue Paler on Regional Planning a~d Tmplcmentation ......................... 33
PLANNING CENTER
i Issue Papers
January 1992
General Plan Program
Issue Paper on Form and Design
Issue Statement:.
How can Temecula enhance its sense of place and identity through urban design?
Issue Definition:
The future development of Temecula should provide the proper relationship between the
residential and business areas of the community while recognizing the importance of the City's
physical setting, open space opportunities and natural features. An urban design strategy for
Temeeula must help to define these relationships by identifying the appropriate linkages or
connections between existing activities, distribution and mixture of future land uses, and the
circulation of pedestrians and automobile traffic. The determination of the urban form must
address the special character of the activity areas of the City including the role of the commercial
centers and the Old Town Area. In this manner, the elements of the General Plan will give
definition to the urban form for Temecula that is functional, conveys a "sense of place," and is
aesthetically pleasing, and sensitive to the natural environmental character of the area.
Background:
A fundamental part of the preparation of the General Plan for the City of Temecula has been to
provide a vision of the future. This vision is based upon the values of the community residents
and leadership of the elected officials. The urban form and design character of the City is. an
intrinsic part of this vision. The basis for the present land use and circulation patterns of the City
have been based upon the original Kaiser Master Plan for the Rancho California area. As
development occurred, modifications were made to the original plans. Because of the rapid
growth of the community and the surrounding area many of the organizing concepts have not
been fully realized. A primary objective of the General Plan is to analyze those elements that
shape the urban form of the community. The elements include:
The Circulation System - The components of thc circulation system include vehicular and
pedestrian modes of travel as well as considerations for local transit and shuttle systems.
In addition, the futurc impacts of increased air service and expansion of the air park can be
a primary d~terminant of the future urban form.
The Land Use Pattern -~r'his pattern would include a balance of residential, commercial
and industrial uses.
THE PLANNING CENTER
1 Urban Form Issue Paper
January 1992
" CITY OF TEME~ General Plan Program
The Open Space System - The environmental setting of the City with the Temecula and
Murrieta Creek provides an opportunity for the creation of an open space and trail system
throughout the City area that will connect to the County open space systems. The
integration of open space with the built environment can provide a comprehensive system
that is easily accessible and contributes to the visual character of the community.
Interests:
City - The City is interested is pwviding a community that has a balance of land uses, retail
opportunities and adequate employment for the residents of the community. The City wants
the community to be aesthetically pleasing with a high quality architectural design and
distinctive "places" for shopping and recreational activities. The City desires to change the
focus of the commercial development from the typical strip shopping mall to a more
pedestrian oriented commercial village or downtown.
Citizens - The citizens are proud of Temecula as their home and want to have commercial
and recreational opportunities close to their homes. The citizens are disturbed about
increasing traffic congestion and the delay in completing traffic improvements. They are
also concerned about the design quality of the buildings that have been constructed in the
community and the encroachment into the open space areas of the region.
Developers - The dcvcloper's believe that new development is implementing the previous
plans for the area and the commercial development has been in response to market demands.
They are hesitant to develop mixed uses and alter standard subdivision design. They are
also hesitant to change the form of the commercial development to be more of a "village
center" with greater pedestrian orientation because of increased costs and the need to
accommodate the public's dependence on the automobile.
Altematives:
The following alternatives have been identified to visualize the potential direction and form that
the City may grow and develop in the future:
Maintain the Existing Trend - The existing development trends in the Temecula area
include a high level of .commercial and residential development activity. Commercial
development~ has been characterized by a high diversity of retail opportunities, fast food
restaurants and service facilities. The western portion of the City is primarily industrial and
business park uses with limited commercial services and no residential. Approximately
fifteen specific plans have been approved or are now in the process of approval within the
City, Sphere of Influence and unincorporated area west of Winchester Road. The proposed
plans in the City and Sphere of Influence total over 12,000 acres and provide for
approximately 32,200 dwelling units, 250 acres of commercial uses, and 2,200 acres of
employment-related uses.
THE PLANNING CENTER
2 Urban Form Issue Paper
January 1992
CITY OF TI~~ Gen~m~ Plan P~nun
Implement the Village Centers
Concept The Village Centers
concept incorporates the proposed
and developed specific plans into an
overall plan for the City. This
concept assumes that there will be
multiple commercial centers in
Temecula and not a single urban
center or downtown area. Each
center will be developed with a
unique theme or special design
character. As an example, the Old
Town Area represents one such
village node that has a distinctive
character based upon the historical
western theme of the area. The
unique functional aspects of that
area as a special tourist attraction
will be developed through the
specific plan process or other design
review procedure. This concept
provides identity through use of
VIllage Centers Concept
villages to promote the unique areas of Tcmecula and provide direction for establishing a
theme or unifying concept for newly developing commercial centers. Special design
guidelines for each Village Center would be developed. Each major specific plan would
contain area higher intensity villages with mixtures of complementary uses.
Circulation concepts for the Village Centers concept would includc secondary major strccts
to supplement the arterial highways. These major streets would link the Village Centers,
other employment areas, and provide connections to the City of Murricta. This would
require new connections over 1-15 by linking the village area with a shuttle bus system loop
would help to eliminate unnecessary vehicle trips. This transportation loop could also link
the Villagc Centers with the airport, City Hall, as well as commercial and lodging facilities.
In addition to vehicular connections, the Open Space and Trail System would bc an integral
part of the circulation network between the Village Centers.
The centers would provide the opportunity for a diversity of housing types at various
densities that would be.close to employment, retail, and recreational opportunities. This
would help to create a balanced distribution of housing opportunities throughout the City.
By focusing higher intensity development in the Village Center areas the single family
residential areas can be preserved and protected from higher density intrusions as well as
by excessive traffic. Areas adjacent to the City can be protected from higher density
development and the agricultural character of the areas can be preserved.
THE PLANNING CENTER
3 Urban Form Issue Paper
January 1992
CITY OF TEhlE~ General Plan Program
Implement the Urban Core
Concept - The Urban Core Concept
is based upon the basic objective to
focus the resources and activities of
the community in a dominant center.
Because of the existing development
patterns of the community, the
Urban Center of Temecula would
most likely extend from the Old
Town Area to the Winchester Road
area. The area would be linked
together with circulation routes as
well as a carefully articulated system
of open spaces, trails, plazas and
walkways. Higher density housing
would be integrated as a part of the
retail, office and public faeilities.
Because of the concentration of
housing, circulation and access to
regional mass transit would be
greatly facilitated.
Urban Core Concept
This concept would also emphasize the preservation of agricultural and open space character
of the lands in the surrounding area by promoting only higher urban densities in the core
area, lower density development in the predominantly single family areas away from the
core and very low density near the boundaries of the City.
Implications:
Existing Trends - The Existing trends alternative continues the present sprawling
development pattern that is characteristic of many rapidly growing communities. The
existing trends pattern will continue the pattern of dependence upon the automobile for
circulation throughout the City and could discourage pedestrian and bicycle circulation.
Traffic congestion will increase even with the planned improvements. The character of
commercial development will also be more of the typical strip center type without the
emphasis upon design themes and pedestrian amenities as suggested in the other alternatives.
Village Center - The Village Center alternative provides an opportunity to work in the
context of the projects that have been approved to date although some modification may be
desired. The concept has the greatest potential for encouraging pedestrian oriented design
in the commercial areas and integration with the open space system. Because of the
development of distinctive multiple centers with concentrations of higher intensity uses,
traffic circulation and local transit options could be more effectively implemented.
THE PLANNING CENTER
4 Urban Form Issue Paper
January 1992
~ OF TEMECULA G~neml Plan ProFaro
Urban Centers - The Urban Center concept provides the greatest opportunity to create a
dominant center with an overall design strategy. However, sinc~ the concept will involve
significant change to existing and approved projects it will be difficult to implement.
However, by concentrating major commercial and higher density housing in this area the
Urban Center provides the greatest critical mass for effectively implementing mass transit
programs.
Recommendations:
The Village Center concept often the most realistic and creative option for the community.
Because of the past development patterns, a single "doWntown" area does not seem to be feasible.
The development of the special centers can provide the "organizing elements" that will create a
sense of place for the community. Each center can be created with its own unique function and
character. Design guidelines can be formulated for each area that will promote the balance of
land uses, pedestrian amenities, and, convenient internal and external circulation patterns. Village
centers would be created at key locations throughout the planning area including the Old Town
Area, the Ynez Corridor Area, the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan Area and along State
Route 79 South between Paloma del Sol and Redhawk.. The Regional Center has the potential
for a Village Center that implements mixed uses, higher intensity commercial development and
possible civic center uses. The Village Centers could potentially provide a catalyst for selective
urban intensification along the 1-15 Corridor.
TI~ PLANNING CENTER
5 Urban Form Issue Paper
January 1992
CITY OF TEMECULA General Plan Program
Issue Paper on Economic Development and Balanced Land Uses
Issue Statement:.
How can Temecula best plan to meet its employment growth goals while providing a
diversity and balance of development, employment and housing opportunities?
Issue Definition:
Temecula currently has a number of favorable employment growth conditions--including
demonstrated attractiveness to industry. The City wishes to focus future efforts on continuing
to attract high quality clear industry. This emphasis is indicated in the City's recent hiring of
a promotional consultant to-market Temecula and Rancho California to a national audience.
In the City and Sphere of Influence, there are currently over 2,000 acres of vacant land
designated or proposed for employment and 350 acres for retail development. Because of this
very large quantity of vacant land for economic development, there is a need to define specific
roles for multiple employment centers.
While the City wishes to become a major employment center, there is a recognized need to
maintain the City's high standard of community development and quality of life. The provision
of a range of housing opportunities to attract business and meet General Plan goals must be
included in the City's economic development strategy.
Background:
Projections of Economic Growth - Temecula's job base grew very rapidly during the
1980s. According to the eonsultant's database, jobs in Temecula expanded from about
4,000 in 1983 to over 15,000 by 1992. This growth represents an annual growth rate of
about 18 percent, significantly higher than growth in both the Riverside-San Bemardino
Metropolitan Area and Southwest Riverside County. According to the consultant's
preliminary analysis, employment growth through the year 2010 is projected as follows:
City of Temecula
Economic Trends and Projections
4,000 15,000
Historic Trend
Low Projection
High Projection
27,000 45,000
40,000 68,000
THE PLANNING CENTER
Economic Issue Paper
January 1992
CITY OF TE1M!i:CULA General Plan Program
Location of Economic Growth in Temecula - Temecula currently has three emerging
employment centers:
· West of Interstate 15 generally north of Rancho California Road and the City Limit
· Around the intersection of Rancho California Road and Ynez Road
· Around the intersection of Ynez Road and Winchester Road
Currently, about 60 percent of the jobs are located west of Interstate 15 and 40 percent are
located east of Interstate 15. Major additions of new employment could be accommodated
in the City's northwest Sphere of Influence, around French Valley Airport.
Buildout Potential to Accommodate Employment - According to buildout projections, the
City could accommodate approximately 80,000 additional jobs. This buildout potential
exceeds the demand under the projections presented above. Total 1992-2010 demand-based
job growth is projected to range from about 30,000 to 53,000 jobs.
Housing Implications of Job Growth - Using a regional ratio of 1.3 jobs per housing unit,
the holding capacity of 80,000 jobs implies a demand for about 60,000 housing units.
Within the City and the Sphere of Influence, there exists a holding capacity for about
42,000 additional housing units, according to the eonsultant's projection. Therefore, the
overall future housing supply may be inadequate to serve all future job expansion. Also,
the consistency between future housing supply by price and type, and demand by income
should be considered.
Fiscal Implications of Job Growth Patterns - In many cities, residential developments
have been perceived as producing a negative fiscal impact; retail and lodging have been
perceived as generating a positive fiscal impact; and office and industrial developments have
been perceived as having a neutral fiscal impact. While these perceptions are often correct
at a site-specific level, land planning at the general plan level requires a comprehensive
approach, incorporating the interrelationships between different land uses. These
interrelationships include:
Housing and Employment - Housing availability and community amenities are
emerging as a key component in attracting business to an area. In a normal labor
market, employers may utilize a community's lifestyle and amenities as a recruiting
tool.
Employment and Lodging The non-destination lodging industry relies on
employment generated by industrial and business park land uses for a significant part
of its demand.
Residential and Retail - Local population generates the majority of the demand for
community and neighborhood retail, as well as a some demand for regional retail.
TI{E PLANNING CENTER
7 Economic Issue Paper
January 1992
CITY OF TE1VIECULA General Plan Program
Interests:
City - The City has placed a high priority on economic development, as demonstrated 'in
its recent hiring of a marketing consultant. Tcmecula's regional role as an employment
center will contribute to a diversity of economic opportunities, assist in financing City
services and infrastructure, and support cultural diversity.
Developers and Businesses - With over 2,000 acres of planned industrial development, land
developers, the real estate industry and existing and future businesses have a strong interest
in continued employment growth in Temeeula.
Residents - Existing and future residents of-T. emeeula will benefit from economic
development in a number of ways. Economic development will provide a wider range of
job opportunities for individuals, and will also contribute financial resources to improve the
quality of life in Temecula.
Altematives:"
Defining Market Segments for Employment Centers - Under this alternative, the City
would define roles or niches for each employment center in the City. Potential types of
employment centers may include:
A center oriented toward accommodating elite office activities (i.e. corporate
headquarters), including hotels, support retail and attached housing
· A technology-oriented employment center
Designating a range of lot sizes within the City's employment centers to accommodate
a range of owner users, as well as multi-tenant developments
An employment center which includes civic uses, cultural facilities and government
offices
Development of employment opportunities which take advantage of Temecula's unique
Old Town
· A center which accommodates commercial recreation uses
Meeting a Range of Housing Demands - The City would review designations for housing
development and evaluate'the residential mix in terms of meeting future demand, including
housing of the following types:
· Designation of well-planned, high-quality attached ownership and rentership housing
· Designating an adequate supply of large lot and executive homes
THE PLANNING CENTER
8 Economic Issue Paper
January 1992
CITY OF TE1V~~ General Plan Program
Locating high density developments adjacent to employment centers, shopping, transit
facilities and community services
Planning for Mixed-Use Developments - The City would apply mixed-use concepts to
generate additional market support for its employment centers. Based on Urban Land
Institute standards, mixed-use developments include three or more income-generating land
uses, such as office, retail and hotel. Mixed-use developments could be integrated with
circulation plans and adjacent developments to reduce automobile dependency
Implications:
Defining Market Segments for Employment Centers - By clearly defining a role, image
and market segment for each employment center, Temecula can reduce unnecessary
competition, serve a wider range of new businesses and provide diversity and mixed-use
development opportunities in the City.
Meeting a Range of Housing Demands - By providing diversity in the housing market,
Temecula will meet requirements associated with the Housing Element, will enhance the
potential to attract business, and will increase economic opportunities for Temecula
residents.
Planning for Mixed-Use Developments - Mixed-use development would be appropriate in
providing a diversity in the City's employment centers. This development type may also
provide attractive locations for attached housing, particularly rental housing. Service
provision to mixed-use developments may be facilitated, and City revenue generation
enhanced.
Recommendations:
The City should orient its marketing strategy and economic development element toward
industrial diversification, specifically identifying industrial types and organizations most suited
to Temecula, including major state and federal facilities. The potential mix of future employers
by size should be evaluated to help determine an appropriate lot mix for Temecula's employment
centers. The City's economic development strategy, land use policy and marketing strategy
should be integrated and coordinated.
The City should carefully evaluate the level and mix of future employment types in terms of
housing demand. The potential imbalance between land designated for employment and land
designated for residential develGpment should be examined in more detail. Means of providing
a suitable jobs/housing balance should be included in its economic development strategy.
The City should explore development standards which will promote compact, mixed-use
developments to provide diversity, economic advantages and linkages with the transportation
system.
THE PLANNING CENTER
9 Economic Issue Paper
January 1992
CITY OF TE1VIECULA General Plan Program
Issue Paper on Circulation and Traffic Congestion
Issue Stcr[ement:
How can the City improve circulation and traffic congestion in the long-term?
Issue Definition:
The City is currently experiencing extreme levels of traffic congestion at peak periods of the day
at the freeway interchanges and other intersections in the community. Planned circulation
improvements will ease congestion some, however, future development both locally and
regionally will continue to strain the circulation system at key locations in the City. The long-
term solution to an adequation circulation system for Temecula and acceptable levels of traffic
congestion involve a combination of:. 1) improvements to the system (road extensions,
signalization','*' ree0nfiguratidn 'of ":interchinges;':pedestrian' ahd bicycle trails, "etc.); 2) Trani-''~':
portation Demand Management Strategies (ridesharing, flex-time schedules, telecommuting, etc.);
and 3) a land use pattern and intensity of development that encourages alternative modes of
transportation and reduces the need for trips outside a project or area of the City. The
combination of land use and circulation policies set forth by the City today will greatly influence
the efficiency and mode of travel within Temecula in the future.
Background:
There are currently eight intersections in the area that have one or more traffic movements which
are currently operating at Level of Service E or F during peak periods. A LOS E describes a
condition where traffic is at the maximum volume that intersections can accommodate and
vehicles must wait through more than one signal cycle to travel through the intersection. A LOS
F indicates a major breakdown in the flow of traffic; traffic must stop for long periods of time
and travel speed is extremely low. The existing level of traffic congestion is partially due to the
number of roadways including Margarita Road, Butterfield Stage Road, Diaz Road, Ynez Road
and State Route 79 that are not yet improved continuously along their ultimate planned
alignment. Furthermore, most of those planned segments of roadway which currently exist vary
in width throughout the alignment. This piecemeal development of the circulation system has
caused overloading of some afterisis and use of local streets to access certain parts of town.
The completion of the original_planned backbone system will help to alleviate some existing
congestion and circulation problems. However, additional improvements are needed to serve
existing and approved development including: the reconstruction of the 1-15 interchanges, new
freeway and creek overpasses, the "western bypass corridor," and the widening/reeonfiguration
of intersections. In the long-term. even these improvements will not be enough to accommodate
future prooosed development. There are approximately 15 proposed specific plans in General
THE PLANNING CENTER
10 Circulation Issue Paper
January 1992
CITY OF MECULA General Plan Program
Plan Study Area and numerous other proposed developments in Murricta and the surrounding
area that will significantly impact Tcmecula's circulation system if approve& The potential level
of future traffic congestion will not only be determined by the circulation system (and
construction of future improvements required to serve new development). Future levels of traffic
will be influenced by the land use pattern which either encourages or discourages automotive
travel, and by the availability and convenience of walking, biking, using a shuttle or bus service
to cross town, or a fixed rail system that links Temecula with other communities. Through the
General Plan the City has an opportunity to establish policies and strategies that may reduce
potential congestion and the extent of future roadway additions or improvements.
Interests:
City Officials - City officials want to maintain a balance between land use and the capacity
of the circulation system in both the short and long-term (a difficult task at best). The City
is also interested in using equitable financing mechanisms to contend with existing
circulation problems.; .... ......
General Public - The public is anxious to see traffic conditions improve immediately. The
public is concerned that future development will only add to the current level of congestion
regardless of any road improvements. Residents want convenient (and low cost) travel
options including, trails/sidewalks to commercial and employment uses, and local bus or
shuttle service.
Development Industry - Developers want adequate traffic circulation for their projects.
However, they are concerned about increasing the project's costs and being required to bear
the burden of existing circulation deficiencies. In today's marketplace, developers are
resistant to assuming the full cost for needed offsite infrastructure improvements,
particularly the big ticket items such as a new interchange (Date Street) or interchange
improvements.
ARemotives:
Land Use Strategies
Continuation of Development Trends - Process and approve proposed specific plans, site
plans and tentative maps at the current proposed levels of density and intensity of use.
Encourage Intensification and Mixture of Land Uses - Through the General Plan and
Zoning Code encourage the location, concentration and intensification of commercial and
office development only in designated core area(s). In these areas introduce and encourage
civic and cultural uses, mixed use development, and high density housing where appropriate
in and around the core area(s). Architecture, landscape design and site planning in these
areas would emphasize a pedestrian scale and access between uses. The trend to permit
THE PLANNING CENTER
11 Circulation Issue Paper
January 1992
CITY OF TEMECULA General Plan Program
strip commercial development along Winchester Road and Highway 79 South would be
restricted. Small neighborhood commercial centers may be located within residential areas
to conveniently serve residents for day-to-day shopping/service needs.
Decrease Land Use Densities and Intensifies in the Study Area - The City would work
cooperatively with the county to increase control over land use in the Study Area. The
purpose of this strategy would be to restrict the amount of development in proposed projects
which impact intersections that are operating at less than acceptable levels of service.
Circulation Strategies
Status Quo Approach - Circulation system improvements such as the extension or
widening of arterials would occur in response to development. High priority system
improvements such as the western bypass corridor and signal synchronization may be
incorporated into the City's Five-Year Capital Improvement Program as funding sources
permit.
Circulation System Phasing Plan - The City would develop a strategy for early
implementation of key arterials within the system. Butterfield Stage Road, the extension
of Ynez Road and other arterials would be constructed prior to adjacent development in
cooperation with adjacent landowners. This system phasing plan would also serve as a tool
for preserving and implementing new transportation corridors. Special emphasis would be
placed on implementing a Master Plan of Trails to encourage the use of non-motorized
modes of transportation for commuting, shopping, and recreation. Additionally, the City
would establish cooperative agreements with the City of Murrieta and the County of
Riverside in terms of: transportation system continuity, planning of new regional corridors,
and establishing implementation priorities and cost sharing mechanisms for improvements
serving mutual needs.
Expansion of Transit Services - The City would work with the Riverside Transit Agency
to expand service in the Study Area. This expansion would include offering a shuttle
service within the community that connects the business park/industrial area to the
commercial centers and neighborhoods.
Increase the Use of Transportation Demand Management Techniques - Regulation XV
of the AQMP currently requires employers of 100 or more employees to prepare and
implement Trip Reduction Plans to reduce Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) among
employees. Furthermore, local governments are required to adopt employment related Trip
Reduction Ordinances by 1994. This alternative would involve the City taking a more
proactive role in reducing-AVR among employers by applying TDM techniques prior to
1994. Such programs would include requiring staggered work hours or flex-time programs
as a permit condition for new business development, encouraging the formation of
Transportation Management Associations (TMA) for large companies or groups of
companies, requiring telecommuting centers in new business developments, and working
with the trucking industry to reduce peak-hour deliveries.
THE PLANNING CENTER
12 Circulation Issue Paper
January 1992
CITY OF TE1VIECULA General Plan Program
Implications:
Land Use Stratelries
Continuation of Development Trends - Congestion would be anticipatexl to significantly
increase along Winchester Road, Interstate 15, Jefferson Road, Ynez Road and State Route
79 South. Although traffic volumes under this scenario have not yet been modeled,
volumes would be expcctexl to exc~d a LOS D at intersections. The dispersed pattern and
low intensity of buildout would lead to a dependence on the automobile for most trips.
However, the City would have an opportunity to require design features within future
approved development that provide more convenient transit access. Such features would
include bus pullout areas and bus stop facilities, efficient trail systems through development
projects leading to major arterials, and pedestrian walkways that pass through subdivision
boundary walls. This alternative land use strategy would bc suitable for a Dial-A-Ride
service, which may not be as inexpensive as bus service but would provide a convenient
alternative to driving alone. In addition, the City could support an Express Transit Service
that would provide transit (van or bus) service between communities for commuters.
Encourage Intensification and Mixture of Land Uses - Concentrating urban uses and
encouraging a complementary mix of land uses will provide opportunities for alternative
modes of travel that do not currently exist within Temecula. Mixed use development
projects have the potential to internalize trips by providing convenient services and
employment opportunities to project residents. When properly designed, these types of
projects not only reduce off-site vehicular travel and traffic congestion, but can also reduce
on-site vehicular travel by promoting a change in the method of travel. Intensification of
uses in some areas can promote transit use and create a community which could be serviced
by transit in a more cost-effective manner. A reduction in traffic congestion decreases the
social and environmental costs associated with driving and would generally improve the
quality of life for Temecula residents.
Decrease Land Use Intensities and Densities in the Study Area - The City currently has
very limited control of traffic resulting from approved and proposed development outside
the City boundaries. However, the City may influence land use in the Study Area through
Pro-annexation Agreements or Memorandums of Understanding with project proponents.
Furthermore, Temecula has no control over the amount of through traffic that uses 1-15,
Winchester Road, and State Route 79 South. Through leadership or active participation in
the Westem Riverside Council of Governments, as discussed in the Issue Paper entitled
"Regional Planning and Implementation," the City may have greater influence on future land
use in the surrounding area.
THE PLANNING CENTBR
13 Circulation Issue Paper
January 1992
CITY OF TEMECULA General Plan Program
Circulation Stratelzies
Status Quo Approach - The current method of dealing with traffic problems and roadway
improvements is a reactive approach which tends to perpetuate unacceptable levels of traffic
congestion. Until continuity can be established in the local arterial system and additional
capacity can be provided across the 1-15 freeway, traffic congestion in the short-ten will
continue to be experienced at an around Winchester Road, Rancho California Road, and
State Route 79 South interchange with 1-15. This reactive approach in providing needed
transportation improvements is inherently short-sighted and could result in the loss of
limited opportunities to enhance the currently planned circulation system.
Circulation System Phasing Plan - This alternati.ve would require the City to develop a
comprehensive Circulation Phasing and Financing Program for participation by new
development. The City would be taking a proactive role in identifying and priofitizing
system improvements and strategies for implementing such improvements. A key
component of the plan would be close coordination with the City of Murrieta and County
of Riverside to develop cooperative agreements concerning mutually beneficial circulation
system improvements. The alternative would also involve the preparation of a financing and
implementation program for trails. A Trails Plan is currently being developed as part of the
City's Park and Recreation Master Plan and is designed to cormcct residential areas with
commercial, office and industrial areas. The Trails Plan should include policies requiring
pedestrian and bike trails within project developments which link to the citywide system
defined by the Trails Plan.
The adoption of this approach would assist the City in overcoming the current reactire
mode of dealing with traffic circulation problems. It would also serve as a method of
preserving opportunities for circulation system enhancements. The implementation of a
Trails Plan would play an important role in providing for alternative modes of transportation
and minimizing increases in vehicular travel from new development.
Expansion of Transit Services - This alternative would involve an increased effort on
behalf of the City to plan and promote new bus and shuttle services within the community.
The City, possibly in conjunction with the Riverside Transit Agency would need to conduct
a study to determine routes and the most efficient types of service (bus or shuttle). This
study should also identify transit promoting features which should be incorporated into new
development projects. The provision of transit service, in itself, would not guarantee
ridership or a total solution to area traffic problems. However, carefully planned service
combined with public education and special land development strategies could result in a
measurable i'eduction in personal automobile usage.
Increase Use of Transportation Demand Management Techniques - This alternative
would require the City to take a proactive role in the development of trip reduction
ordinances prior to 1994. These ordinances would focus on employment-oriented
development, but would also include Transportation Demand Management CI"DM)
requirements for all development projects which have a reasonable potential to reduce
THB PLANNING CENTER
14 Circulation Issue Paper
January 1992
CITY OF TEMECIRA General Plan Program
vehicular trips using TDM techniques. This approach would also require that the City
develop guidelines and procedures by which new business development and other major
development projects would form Transportation Demand Management Associations
CYMA's). Trip reduction and/or Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) would be established
by the City and mechanism set up for monitoring and enforcing these goals.
An aggressive TDM program can have a significant effect on minimizing traffic increases
caused by new major development, particularly during the critical peak traffic periods.
Recommendations:
An aggressive, multi-faceted approach should be undertaken which includes the following
components:
Encourage mixed-use projects which will maximize internal trip making and promote a shift
from personal auto travel to pedestrian and bicycle modes.
Selectively encourage mixed-use projects with intensification where this will facilitate transit
service and promote transit aldership.
Intense projects which maximize off-site travel should generally be avoided throughout the
City and, in particular, should be avoided in areas where traffic congestion is expected to
be most severe.
A decrease in land use densities may be appropriate in some areas and for some land use
categories which result in significant traffic impacts at principal arterial intersections.
In all cases, new development should incorporate design features which facilitate transit
service and encourage transit ridership.
A citywide comprehensive Circulation System Phasing and Financing Program for
implementation of the General Plan Circulation Element should be prepared and adopted.
Careful prioritization of key system elements and the adoption of new transportation
corridor and overpass/interchange facilities will be crucial components of the plan.
Coordination with regional plans and agencies will also be a necessity.
Transit service expansion should be undertaken and carefully coordinated with new
development projects. The ultimate transit needs of the City would include a mix of:
· Fixed mute service (including possible shuttle bus service) along major transportation
corridors connecting major activity centers;
· Dial-a-Ride type service for lower density residential areas;
THE PLANNING CENTER
15 Circulation Issue Paper
January 1992
CITY OF TE1VIF~CULA Genen~ P~n Program
· Express transit service with park-and-ride facilities for area commuters; and
Potential light rail transit along major transportation corridors which connect Temecula
to'other population centers. Opportunities should be explored for the implementation
of one or more multimodal transportation centers.
Adoption of aggressive Trip Reduction Ordinances which incorporate a wide range of
Transportation Demand Management techniques.
THE PLANNING CENTER
16 Circulation Issue Paper
January 1992
CITY OF TEMECULA General Plan Program
Issue Paper on the Open Space System
Issue Statement:
What should constitute the Open Space System for Temecula?
Issue Definition:
The State of California recognizes open space as a diminishing resource, and requires that a city
"make definite plans for the preservation of valuable open space land and take positive action to
carry out such plans by the adoption and strict administration of laws, ordinances, rules and
regulations as authorized by state planning law and other appropriate methods" (Government
Code Section 65561). The General Plan for Temecula will include an open space plan with
policies and strategies to create the open space system. Through the General Plan process, open
space planning will be integrated with planning for land use, transportation, social and
recreational needs, tourism, etc. The open space system should not consist of unusable spaces
leftover from development. The challenge facing Temecula is to proactively create an open space
system that effectively uses the physical resources for recreation, ecological purposes, economic
enhancement, and to preserve the open space/rural character of the community. The focus of this
Issue Paper is on the options available to the City for defining and creating its future open space
system.
Background:
Temecula's open space can be classified into two categories: 1) permanent open space and 2]
interim open space. Permanent open space in the community consists primarily of public parks
(126.2 acres), school playgrounds, two privately owned golf courses and a large open space area
in Meadowview. In addition, for purposes of public health and safety permanent open space
includes the floodways along Murrieta Creek, Temecula Creek and Santa Margarita River, and
land within the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone which contain traces of an active fault.
Interim open space is primarily privately owned land which is anticipated to be developed
sometime in the future. The majority of open space in the General Plan Study Area is interim
in nature and contributes to the "open space/rural character" that is desired by many residents.
To date, the pres6rvation of open space and the development of recreation facilities has occurred
on a piecemeal basis througtr project development and city acquisition of property. The
"permanent" open space system currently lacks order or a pattem that fits well with and enhances
the urban form of Temecula. Existing parks are not linked by trails or linear greenbelts; the
amount, location and type of parkland and recreation facilities does not meet current demands;
there is no public trail system connecting to regional open space/recreation opportunities; and
there has been little effort to conserve open space for its resource or scenic value. The City is
THE PLANNING CENTER
17 Open Space Issue Paper
January 2992
CITY OF TE1VIECULA General Plan Program
currently preparing a Parks and Recreation Master Plan which will include a plan for acquisition
and development of parks; a plan for a multi-use trail system; an operations and management
strategy for these facilities; and an implementation component that sets priorities and establishes
a capital improvement program for parks and recreations facilities.
Interests:
City - The City places a high priority on providing open space for recreational purposes.
The City wants to make sure that future development provides an adequate amount of
usable parkland. The City also wants to see more functional open space incorporated into
the design of commercial developments (e.g., courtyards, ?lazas, walkways). The City is
also interested in preserving open space to protect ridgeli:~es, watercourses, or significant
habitats areas. However, the City is concerned about open space maintenance and liability.
Residents - Temecula residents want parks located conveniently to their homes and
developed with a variety of sports and recreation facilities (see Temecula Recreation Needs
Assessment Survey by The Research Network, September 1991). Residents also want a safe
trail system along roadways, the creeks, and the San Diego Aqueduct, which connects to
regional trails. To the extent feasible, many residents want -~he "rural atmosphere" preserved
that is associated with the existing open space and low density residential development.
Environmental Interests - The Nature Conservancy, the University of San Diego, local
biologists and environmental interest groups want the remaining natural habitat along
Murrieta Creek, Pechanga Creek, Temecula Creek and the Santa Margarita River enhanced
and preserved for the protection of vegetation and wildlife.
Alternatives:
Develop a Comprehensive Open Space System - The City would plan and design its open
space system to provide for a range of functions (e.g., recreation, conservation, bike or
pedestrian travel, scenic arechilies, people gathering, public safety, buffering land uses,
economic enhancement, etc.). Through the development review process, the City would
encourage or require conservation of significant resource areas, dedication of usable
parkland and provision of facilities, open space linkages to adjacent developments, sensitive
grading of hillside areas, internal trail systems linking wit ~ the City's Trails Master Plan,
people gathe. ring areas in non-residential developments, and open space buffers as needed.
Participate in a Coordltated Resource Management ;?lan- This alternative would
involve a joint effort by the City, the Nature Conservancy, ;andowners, the Pechanga Indian
Reservation, BLM and other agencies to develop a resto:ation/conservation plan for the
Santa Margarita River and Pechanga Creek. Based on studies by the Nature Conservaney
and Department of Fish and Game, the habitat along the Santa Margarita River and parts
of Pechanga Creek are considered of regional and state significance.
TI-IE PLANNING CENTER 18
Open Space lssae Paper
January 1992
CITY OF TE1VIE~ General Plan Program
Implement a System of Transferable Development Credits CFDC) Under this
alternative, the City (with support of the county) would concentrate future urban
development around the Borel Airpark area and designate open space or agricultural uses
in the outlying areas of the City's Sphere of Influence and unincorporated area west of
Winchester Road. In order for the owners of nondevelopable land to share in the benefits
given to owners of developable land, the City and county would prepare and implement a
system of TDCs. The system would require owners of developable land to acquire the
TDC's held by owners of nondevelopable land, in order to proceed with development.
ImpliCations:
Develop a Comprehensive Open Space System - The various functions of open space
would be integrated with the urban form of Temecula. The City would use techniques such
as the direct purchase of land, acquisition of easements, condemnation, participation in grant
programs, joint use agreements, and zoning and subdivision regulations to create the open
space system. This alternative may possibly involve a greater commitment of financial
resources than is currently earmarked for open space/recreation in the City's Five Year
Capital Improvement Program.
Participate in a Coordinated Resource Management Plan - This alternative would
involve a commitment of staff time to participate in developing and implementing a plan
that is successful in conserving the resource value of the area. This alternative may also
involve some commitment of resources to purchase land or acquire easements. The
participation of the City would be essential if the Santa Margarita River and Pechanga
Creek are to continue to function as wildlife movement corridom.
Implement a System of Transferable Development Credits (TDCs) - This alternative
would limit scattered or sprawled development in order to more efficiently utilize urban
services and preserve the remaining open space character of the community. Furthermore,
containing urban growth would establish a boundary or edge for Temecula that envelopes
the community and ensures its distinctness from Murricta and communities to the north.
The system of TDC. s would give the holders of land slated for nondevelopable uses a
valuable fight that could be sold or traded to owners of developable land at whatever price
the market would bear. The City and county would be responsible for issuing the TDCs
at the beginning of the program and keeping a record of TDC transactions. The City and
county would also monitor and enforce the system. The City could also participate in the
system as an independent buyer of TDCs in order to develop parks and recreation facilities.
Recommendation:
The City should prepare a joint study with the county to determine the viability of a TDC system.
The feasibility study should include: an analysis of the long-ten market demand and supply for
property in the area; an analysis of the existing regulatory flamework and its compatibility with
THE PLANNING CENTER
19 Open Space Issue Paper
Jwuazty 1992
CITY OF TEMECUIA. General Plan Program
a TDC system; and the determination of landowner and community support for such a system.
If a TDC is determined to be the appropriate. tool for conserving open space in the area, then the
first step in this process is an agreement between the City and county to amend the Southwest
Area Plan as necessary to designate open space or agricultural uses north of the Borel Airpark
area.
The City should also incorporate into the General Plan the policies and implementation
mechanisms necessary to develop a comprehensive open space system and participate in a
coordinated Resource Management Plan as described in the first and second alternatives.
THE PLANNING CENTER
20 Open Space Issue Paper
January 1992
CITY OF TE1VIE~ General Plan Program
Issue Paper on Residential Density Mix and Distribution
Issue Statement.
How can the City achieve a range of residential' densities which accommodates the
needs of exiting and future residents, while positively contributing to the character of
the community?
Issue Definition:
The distribution, density and quality of residential development is a key factor in establishing and
maintaining a desirable community character. Temecula is identified as a predominantly single-
family community with some remaining rural residential areas. By increasing the mix of
residential densities, the City can accommodate a greater diversity of housing needs and promote
a more efficient pattern of residential development. The type of housing may include lower
density single-family detached units such as the estate or ranch type home on a lot of several
acres, or the typical single-family dwelling on a 5,000 to 8,000 sq. ft. lot. Other housing types
that are clustered or attached products include the zero lot line home, patio homes, townhomes,
duplexes or triplexes. Higher density housing types with attached units include multiple family
garden apartments or condominiums that may be stacked units with several stories. Each of these
housing types offers special housing opportunities depending on personal housing preferences and
income levels of the occupants.
The Government Code (Article 10.6) requires that the Housing Element of the General Plan make
"adequate provisions for the existing and projected needs of all economic segments of the
community." Therefore, a range of housing types and densities can provide the diversity of
residential options for the existing and future residents of the City, but will also help the City to
meet the legal mandates of the State of California.
Background:
Residential development accounts for approximately three-fourths of existing land uses in
Temecula. The majority of the City's housing stock consists of single-family dwelling units.
Residential development is generally located east of Interstate 15. Older single-family units and
newer multi-family dwellings are located south of Ranthe California Road and west of Interstate
15. Residential density in the City ranges from estate lots up to 16 units per acre. The trend of
proposed future development is to continue the pattern of single-family detached units. Although
in the current market, builders are developing lower cost homes (for the first time home buyer)
on smaller lots. Approximately sixty percent of the dwelling units proposed in Temecula and
its Sphere of Influence are in the range of two to five dwelling units per acre. Over twenty
percent of the proposed units are planned at densities of thirteen to sixteen dwelling units per
THE PLANNING CENTER
21 Residential Issue Paper
January 1992
CITY OF TEM'ECULA General Plan Program
acre. However, development often occurs at densities lower than the maximum density for the
residential designation.
Interests:
City - There is a general concern for the environmental impacts of higher density
development, and the capacity of the City's infrastructure and public services to
accommodate development. The City is especially concerned with maintaining the integrity
of single-family residential areas, and how to effectively plan new multi-family
development.
General Public - The deterioration of several multi-family housing developments in the
City has caused a general resistance to higher density development. Residents believe that
higher density development would adversely impact the quality of life as it adds more
population, and hence traffic, increased crime, and demands for services.
Landowners/Developers In light of today's economic conditions, developers are
concerned about providing a marketable and affordable product. This can result in smaller
or attached dwellings and smaller building sites at higher densities than the typical single-
family home. Developers share the City's concern with the cost of mitigating impacts of
higher density development. However, by increasing the density of development, the land
cost per dwelling unit is reduced. Therefore, the use of the land resource is more efficient.
From a site planning and design perspective, attached product types are particularly suited
to environmentally constrained areas such as hillsides or sloped areas to avoid excessive
grading.
Alternatives:
Continuation of Development Trends - Process and approve development according to
existing residential development patterns and densities. The existing pattern of development
has tended to concentrate large areas of higher density housing, thereby creating a strong
separation between single-family areas and multiple family areas. Traffic circulation to the
multiple family areas often impact the single-family communities, thereby creating very
negative reactions to permitting new multiple family development.
Encourage a Mix of Residential Densities - Through land use controls, residential densities
can be increased in specified areas of the City. Zoning requirements for minimum and
maximum densities could be applied in specific areas to ensure that a mix of residential
densities is achieved. From a citywide perspective, establishing large multiple family areas
is not essentially different from the existing trend.
An alternative method of providing this mix is to provide for smaller projects with higher
density or attached units sensitively inter-mixed within a residential project. Through
THE PLANNING CENTER 22
Residential Issue Paper
January 1992
CITY OF TE~CUIA General Plan Program
appropriate site planning and architectural design, the attached units can blend into the
single-family character of the areas. Townhouses, patio homes, or duplexes could be
distributed throughout an area and be located adjacent to common open space areas that are
shared by single-family detached units.
Higher Density Areas Near Village Centers - As a part of the Village Center Concept,
higher density housing could be located adjacent to or within the Village Center areas. The
housing would be at a density higher than that permitted in the residential areas of the City.
The residential component would add a continuous source of activity to the village center
area, and provide housing that is conveniently located near shopping, services and potential
employment opportunities.
Implications:
Continuation of Development Trend - This alternative would result in a limited range of
housing opportunities in terms of type and affordability. The current trend also helps to
sustain the psychological resistance to housing forms other that the typical detached single-
family home. Excessive concentrations of higher density housing sustains the incorrect
impression that all multiple family or rental housing create negative impacts upon the
community, rather than providing a viable housing alternative.
Encourage a Mix of Residential Densities - The City is relativcly homogcnous in terms
of the type of dwellings. A mix of residential densities provides more housing opportunities
for existing and future residents. Density also influences the affordability of housing units
by reducing land costs per unit. The approach of introducing mixtures of compatible
housing types and density as a part the residential development plans offers the potential
of creating a neighborhood area with more diversity, increased open space, access to trails
and effective traffic circulation. The mixture of housing types would be designed is a
manner to avoid land use conflicts and the single vs. multiple family diehotomy. The
majority of the neighborhoods would still have a strong single-family orientation and low
density residential character.
Higher Density Areas near Commercial Centers - The residential areas within the Village
Center areas would offer housing to those who would prefer a more "urban" lifestyle. The
housing type could include townhomes, garden apartments, or mid-rise structures. Densities
could range from ten dwelling units per acre for townhomes to over of thirty dwelling units
per acre for two to three story apartments. Because of the location of the residential areas
in the Villag6 Center, the projects would be close to major transportation routes. Therefore,
the traffic generated wo~tld not impact the lower density residential neighborhoods.
Pedestrian connections would link the housing areas to the commercial service areas thereby
reducing commuting trips. Mass transit routes would be conveniently located near the
Village Center and the residential areas which would link the area to other key activity and
employment centers within the City and the region. The potential residential areas could
THE PLANNING CENTER
23 Residential Issue Paper
January 1992
General Plan Program
provide opportunities for all income groups in the community, and especially for the those
who would prefer to be close to activities and services with minimal vehicular commuting.
Recommendations:
The preservation of established stable residential areas is a fundamental goal of the community.
The City has an opportunity to provide a wide range of compatible housing types and residential
densities in areas of the City through the land use planning process. By clearly specifying the
character and type of housing and density ranges in the General Plan and Zoning Code, the City
can assure that compatible land use relationships are created. The City should avoid
concentrating one type of housing such a as multiple-family rental housing in one sector of the
community. This can be accomplished through encouraging mixtures in housing types and
density as a part of new residential developments throughout the City. Intrusions such as
excessive traffic through the residential areas must be avoided. The appearance of all residential
areas must be maintained. Code enforcement programs can help to upgrade and improve the
quality of existing multi-family development.
The development of higher density housing that is well-designed and integrated with the
surrounding area will help the community serve its housing needs for all income levels. The
preparation of Multiple Family Development design standards can help to assure the quality of
design desired by the community.
THE PLANNING CENTER
24
Residential Issue Paper
January 1992
General Plan Program.
Issue Paper on Assuring Fiscal Viabllity
Issue Statement:
How can Temecula ensure that future development will result in a fiscal balance?
Issue Definition:
New development in Temecula will result in increased demand for services, such as police
protection, fire protection, public works, communi'ty~ development, park maintenance and
recreation. With its existing revenue base, Temecula currently maintains a high level of service
provision to residents and workers. Future development will bring new service requirements as
well as an increased revenue base.
To properly plan for long-term fiscal viability---and to maintain high service
standards--Temecula must evaluate the demand for services and expected revenues associated
with future development scenarios.
Background:
Characteristics of Existing Fiscal Base - As a newly incorporated City, Temecula received
a relatively low property tax allocation, estimated by the consultants at 5.78 percent of the
basic one percent levy. However, the Temeeula Community Services District CYCSD) was
formed at incorporation to provide additional revenue for park maintenance, recreation
programs, street lighting, and perimeter landscaping. City expenditures account for about
84 percent of Temecula's total 1991-1992 operations and maintenance costs, while the
TCSD provides for the other 16 percent of revenues through a parcel charge which is
adjusted annually to provide funding levels commensurate with service requirements. For
a single-family detached housing unit, the parcel charge for fiscal year 1991-1992 is
approximately $300.
Fiscal Characteristics of Land Use Types - Various land use types have varying fiscal
characteristics in terms of revenue and cost generation. However, fiscal interdependencies
must be reco, gnized when evaluating land uses.
· Residential -Resid_ential. land uses typically .~.Create the highest service..demands,
creating additional heals for police and fire protection, and other City basic City
services. However, residential land uses do generate~ population-based revenues such
as mot0r' vehicle license fees, and state subvertlions of gasoline taxes...While these
revenue sources do compensate for increased service demands, residential development
alone may often be projected to generate a negative fiscal impact.
THE PLANNING CENTER
Fiscal Viability Issue Paper
January 1992
ClTY OF TEMECULA Genen~ P~n Program
Retail - Retail development generates sales tax revenues for the City of Temecula
equal to one percent of taxable sales. In fiscal year 1991/1992, sales tax revenues arc
projected to total about $4.5 million, or over one-third of total gcncral fund rcvcnues.
While retail dcvclopmcnt does create somc demand for public safcty and public
services, revenues generated typically exceed costs by a factor of ten. Additionally,
a preliminary retail capturc'analysis prepared by the consultants indicates that
Tcmecula is capturing a significant amount of sales tax dollars from outside its City
limits.
Lodging - Hotel and motel uses generate transient occupancy taxes based on gross
revenues. Currently, the City's transient occupancy tax of 8.0 percent generates over
$500 thousand in annual general fund revenue. Again, costs generated by lodging land
uses arc cxtremcly low relative to their revenue potential.
Employment - Without a major revenue source other than property tax or business
license tax, employment land uses such as office, business park, industrial and
manufacturing typically create a revenue neutral impact on the City's general fund.
Economic Interdependence of Land Uses - Independently, different land use types produce
a diverse range of fiscal impacts. However, different land uses are economically dependent
upon each other, resulting in the need for a balance of land uses. Some of these economic
interdependencies are:
Housing and Employment - Housing availability and community amenities are
emerging as a key component in attracting business to an area. In a tight labor market,
employers are turning to the community's lifestyle as a recruiting tool.
Employment and Lodging - The non-destination lodging industry relies on
employment generated by industrial and business park land uses. In addition, a
segment of the demand for lodging is also generated by residential land uses.
Residential and Retail - Local population generates the majority of the demand for
community and neighborhood retail, as well as a significant portion of the demand for
regional retail.
Land Development Phasing Criteria - In addition to the mix of land use types,
consideration needs to be given to the phasing of land uses such that revenue streams are
in place to .eyxpand services to new development. For capital needs, consideration need to
be given to~the capacity of existing and new development to incur debt to provide for
infrastructure improvements in a timely manner.
THE PLANNING CENTER
26
Fiscal Viability Issue Paper
January 1992
CITY OF TEMECULA Genend P~n ProFaro
Interests:
City - The City officials and staff have an interest in a stable and adequate revenue base.
Such a stable and adequate base contributes to governmental efficiency by increasing
liquidity .and choice; enables the City to meet citizen and business needs for services; and
provides stability to the City government itself.
Residents and Workers - The residents and workers of Temecula are directly affected by
City service levels.
Property Owners and Businesses - The level of taxation and assessment in Temecula
directly affects the economic conditions faced by property owners and businesses. ff the
City 's economic and fiscal strategy can provide revenues without taxes and assessments on
property owners and businesses, Temecula's economic attractiveness will be enhanced.
Altematives:
Def'ming Land Use Phasing to Achieve Fiscal Balance - For operations and maintenance
costs, land use phasing may involve exercising control through specific plans and
development agreements to assure that revenue-positive land uses are incorporated into and
precede development of those uses which may generate deficits.
Consideration of Additional Revenue Sources - While revenue sources to City's are
limited, a business license tax which is fair and reasonable may be considered. Evaluation.
of such a tax would include review of business tax levels in other parts of the state and
local area. Another revenue source which may be considered is the one-time public services
offset fee, similar to that used by Riverside County. This one-time fee provides a fund to
assist the jurisdiction in providing annual services over a period of up to 20 years after
development. The one-time fee can only be assessed through a development agreement.
Fiscal Reform in California - A state solution to the fiscal problems facing counties will
be of assistance in providing a stable fiscal environment for cities. Two provisions to be
considered in fiscal reform for counties include continuation of the 0.5 percent component
of the 1.25 percent sales tax increase enacted in 1991; and the use of increased motor
vehicle license fees and alcohol taxes for county health and mental health services.
Implications:"
Def'ming Land Use Phasing to Achieve Fiscal Balance - Phasing land uses to achieve
fiscal balance may be necessary from the standpoint of the City's fhscal well-being.
However, such phasing may pose potential conflicts with other City goals, for example, in
housing, parks and open space. Implementation of fxscal phasing criteria is most feasible in
THE PLANNING CENTER
27
Fiscal Viability Issue Paper
January 1992
General Plan Program
large multi-use planned communities with a single developer. Fiscal phasing criteria will
be more difficult to implement in development situations with multiple property owners.
Consideration of Additional Revenue Sources - A reasonable business license tax may
be opposed by City staff and officials. Legal issues related to the City's ability to enact a
business license tax without a vote of the electorate may make it less feasible. Regarding
public services offset fees, the City may and developers may regard such fees as too costly
or impractical to implement.
Fiscal Reform in California - ff the fiscal viability of counties is improved, the City could
benefit the City in several ways. First, more property tax revenues may be negotiated for
transfer to the City in future annexations. Second, the City may incur fewer costs in areas
where services are shared with Riverside County~ such as fire protection. Third, municipal
services provided directly to Temecula residents by Riverside County, such as libraries, may
be improved.
Recommendations:
In its land use element, the City should consider methods to assure the phasing of land use to
maximize the City's fiscal liquidity and flexibility. The City may also consider phasing criteria
related to portions of its Sphere of Influence, particularly outlying areas, to avoid premature
development and costly extensions of City services.
The City should consider adoption of a business license tax, and explore other revenue programs,
such as public services offset fees, to provide added revenue generation as development occurs.
The analysis of a business license tax should include review of business license taxes throughout
the state and in nearby competitive locations.
The City should actively participate in forums on fiscal reform topics, including City
organizations, legislative hearings, and special conferences. The City should consider preparing
a policy statement on fiscal reform. The linkages between Riverside County fiscal viability and
Temecula's interests should be defined in detail.
THE PLANNING CENTER
Fiscal Viability Issue Paper
January 1992
CrI~ OF TEMECULA General Plan Program
Issue Paper on Flood Control Facilities
Issue Statement:
How will the City of Temecula implement the construction of safe, effective and
environmentally compatible flood control facilities?
Issue Definition:
Prior to the incorporation of the City of Temeeula,. tffe County of Riverside Transportation
Department and Flood Control District utilized County Ordinance 460 to establish criteria and
conditions for flood protection of new development within its jurisdiction. Since its incorporation
the City has continued to utilize Ordinance 460 for similar purposes. Considerations involved
in flood control planning should include:
· Applicability of approved master drainage plans.
· Joint cooperation between the City and Riverside County Mood Control.
Evaluation of compatibility of current and proposed land uses in and around existing
floodplains and floodways.
Establishing guidelines and criteria for the preservation of natural watercourses and the
development of greenbelt areas.
· Short, medium and long-term goals and strategies.
Background:
The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District CRCFC&WCD) has
enacted, by resolution, the Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan to provide for funding and
construction of flood control facilities in the Murrieta Creek watershed.
As of this writing,, the construction of facilities suggested by rcfcrenced area drainage plan has
been limited to a regional facility along Santa Gertrudis Creek from Murrieta Creek to
Winchester Road and primary facilities known as Lines A, C and C-1.
In addition, other than improvements required of various developments, no concerted effort has
been made to date to prepare an organized plan for the development of flood control facilities
within the watershed of the Pauba Valley.
THE PLANNING CENTER
Flood Control Issue Paper
January 1992
CITY OF TEME~ Genend Plan ProFaro
Interests:
The following have been identified as having significant interests and concern regarding flood
control facilities:
R~sidents~L desire a high level of flood protection while 'maintaining environmental
compatibility.
City Officials - desire to provide a low-maintenance, cost-effective flood control system
which ensures public safety.
RCFC&WCD desire to provide an adequate-backbone system coupled with low-
maintenance and minimal liability.
State and Federal Officials - desire to achieve the goals California Fish and Game Code
and the Clean Water Art.
Altematives:
The approaches which can be taken to respond to the flood control facilities issue include the
following:
Supplement Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan - Continue the use of the Murrieta
Creek Area Drainage Plan while developing additional master plans for the sub-watersheds
which are currently not covered by a master plan.
Prepare a City of Temecula Master Phn - Prepare a new Master Drainage Plan which
incorporates the Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan and additional planning efforts into one
document.
Depend on Developer Funded Improvements - Rely on developer funded improvements
to provide an adequate level of flood protection.
Implications:
What necessarily. must occur so that each option may be realized:
Supplement Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan - This option requires coordination with
RCFC&WCD to ensure the City's goals are properly communicated, construction schedules
are mutually agreeable and fees are properly allocated. In addition, it requires the
expenditure of funds to develop additional master plans, ordinances and programs to manage
collectable fees.
THE PLANNING CENTER
30 Flood Control Issue Paper
January 1992
CITY OF TEMECULA General Plan Program
Prepare a City of Temecula Master Drainage Plan - This program involves the
development of a single document governing the orderly construction of a backbone flood
control system. The document would provide a blueprint for flood protection into the next
c~ntury, a priority list of current problem areas and a funding mechanism for future
construction.
Depend on Developer Funded Improvements - This option would provide adequate
protection for single developments, however, it requires a master plan to provide for the
construction of regional and primary facilities.
Linkage$:
Other issues which may be affected by flood control master planning:
· Impacts to the environment may require mitigation through Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act and Section 1601 of the California Fish and Game Code.
· Introduction of additional drainage fees may impact development.
· May impact live stream flows to downstream users.
· May impact general fund allocations.
Recommendations:
The following goals and strategies arc provided to assist in the development of regional and
primary flood control facilities.
Short-Term fFY 1992)
Goal: Develop programs to maintain existing flood control facilities and protect areas
currently prone flooding.
· Identify and map existing facilities noting which facilities are maintained by the
City and RCFC&WCD.
· D~Velop a proactive program for maintaining catch basins, storm drain inlets and
outlets and improved channels throughout the City. · ·
· Coordinate a maintenance program with RCFC&WCD.
· Identify and evaluate flood prone areas.
~ PLA~NG CENTER
31 Flood Control Issue Paper
January 1992
CITY OF ~CUIA~ General Plan Program
Prioritize areas of flooding based on threat to public safety.
Develop a program to eliminate current flooding problems based on priority.
Allocate funds in fmcal 1992 for maintenance and elimination of flood prone
areas.
Medium-Term (1993-2000)
Goal: Develop master drainage plans for the Sphere of Influence of the City of Temecula.
Strategies:
· Develop master drainage plans in high growth areas.
· Adopt drainage ordinances establishing drainage fees.
· Update priority list of flood prone areas.
· Continue proactive maintenance program.
· Fund projects through Capital Improvements Program.
Lon~-Term (2001- ~
Goal: Update existing citywide master drainage plan.
Strategies:
· Review and update existing master drainage plans.
· If necessary, develop additional master drainage plans.
· Review City drainage ordinances and revise as needed.
· Continue proactive maintenance program.
THE PLANNING CENTER
32
Flood Control Issue Paper
Jamuary 1992
CITY OF TE1VfF-CII. A General Plan Program
Issue Paper on Regional Planning and Implementation
Issue Statement:
How should the City participate in and influence the regional planning efforts of the
Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) ? Should the City reflect or
incorporate the regional plans or strategies prepared by the WRCOG within the General
Plan ?
Issue Definition:
The Western Riverside Council of Governments is a Joint Powers Authority of the cities and
county government of Western Riverside County. The City of Temecula is a charter member of
the COG and currently participates in a number of task forces and committees addressing such
issues as growth management, water resources, and air quality. The WRCOG has drafted a
Subregional Air Quality Implementation Program and is currently preparing a Growth
Management Plan for voluntary implementation by local jurisdictions. The level of participation
in the preparation of regional plans and programs, and the degree to which the City concurs and
implements the policy direction of these plans are important decisions facing City officials.
Background:
The WRCOG was established in the Spring of 1990. According to the Joint Powers Agreement
of the WRCOG, the purpose of the organization is to "conduct studies and projects designed to
improve and coordinate common governmental responsibilities and services on an areawide and
regional basis." Through special task forces comprised of City representatives, the WRCOG
develops strategies and recommendations for addressing problems of mutual concern.
In response to the legislative mandate to comply with the 1991 Air Quality Management Plan,
the Western Riverside Council of Governments developed a Sub-Regional Air Quality
Implementation Program. This Program includes a Model Air Quality Element for incorporation
into local government General Plans. The Element includes policies and programs related to
Transportation Systems Managcmcnt, Transportation Demand Management and land use practices
that are beneficial to air quality. The Program is currently under review by SCAG and AQMD.
The WRCOG is ~;eeking concurrence by local jurisdictions of the Program in early 1992. The
Program is designed to bc incorporated into the general plans of cities and the county.
In response to Riverside County's new Growth Management Element, the WRCOG joined forces
with the Coachella Valley COG to develop a comprehensive Growth Management Plan that both
City and county governments could support. The Plan includes a Vision Statement that has been
approved by the Growth Management Task Force. The implementation component of the Plan
THE PLANNING CENTER
33
Regional Planning Issue Paper
January 1992
CITY OF TEMECULA General Plan Program
has undergone a third revision and is still being refined by the Task Force. The strategy of the
WRCOG is to implement and test various coordination and financing policies within certain areas
in the county. Through the successful implementation of these policies, support for the Growth
Management Plan will be generated over time among all member jurisdictions. The Plan
includes a Services and Facilities Plan that will identify infrastructure requirements and related
financing methods for water and sewer facilities, schools, solid waste, transportation, flood
control and other facilities. The WRCOG is currently focusing on separate strategy plans to
address water resources, transportation, solid waste management, and school facilities which will
ultimately be folded into the Growth Management Plan. The Growth Management Plan is
intended to be incorporated into the general plans of local governments.
Interests:
City - Temecula is interested in furthering cooperation among local governments to the
benefit of the region, however, it does not want to relinquish local decision making powers.
Through its participation in the WRCOG, Tcmecula seeks to protect its long-ten growth
and development interests. The City is also interested in complying with legislative
requirements in a cost-effective manner, which is possible by pooling the resources of the
local governments in western Riverside County.
County of Riverside - The County wants to encourage cooperative planning among local
jurisdictions, particularly in the areas of transportation, water and waste water, flood control
and other infrastructure. The County is also interested in developing a more effective
intergovernmental relationship with municipalities in light of severe recessionary cutbacks
and the probability that most major development will occur within City boundaries in the
future. This is in contrast to the past pattern of extensive county development leading to
incorporation.
Developers - The development industry will be required to comply with the policies and
standards of the Sub-Regional Air Quality Implementation Plan and Growth Management
Plan to the extent the provisions of the plans are incorporated into the General Plan and
further implemented by ordinance. Developers are concerned that such new policies
(especially the untried local air quality policies and strategies) can or will be used by project
opponents to delay or stop a project. This represents another source of risk or delay, over
and above the dollar cost of complying with new mandates.
Altemotives:
City Particination and Influence on Regional Planning Efforts
Leadership Role - The City would position itself within the WRCOG to direct and define
the efforts of the organization. This alternative would involve taking a leadership role on
the various task forces in order to define goals and shape the plans and strategies.
THE PLANNING CENTER
34
Regional Planning Issue Paper
January 1992
CITY OF TE.MEC[JLA Geneffd Plan Program
City
Active Participation - This altemative involves taking an active role within the organization
by attending meetings and responding to draft materials in light of both City interests and
the interests of the county as a whole.
Limited/Selective Participation - The City would reduc~ its current level of involvement
within the WRCOG and selectively choose to participate in those planning activities that
have the greatest impact on the City or those activities that can be accommodated within
the available time and resources. The City would operate more in a reactive mode than
proactive mode in the WRCOG.
No Participation - The City would resign as a member of the WRCOG and not take part
in regional planning and cooperation efforts.
Imnlementation of Reaional Policies and Plans
Adoption of Phns/Strategies Prepared by WRCOG - The City would adopt the Air
Quality Implementation Program and incorporate the Model Air Quality Element within the
new General Plan either by reference or by placing the language in the General Plan. The
City would also adopt and incorporate the Growth Management Plan into the General Plan
once it is completed and endorsed by the WRCOG Task Force.
Tailoring of Plans/Strategies Prepared by WRCOG - The City would revise and tailor
the Air Quality Implementation Program and Model Air Quality Element to meet the
specffic needs and local circumstances of the community.
Limited Support of Phns/Strategies. Prepared by WRCOG The City would
acknowledge some of the policies of the Air Quality Implementation Program and Growth
Management Plan within the General Plan. The City would incorporate the minimum
policies and programs needed to meet air quality requirements. There would also be limited
support of the policies of the Growth Management Plan and no real commitment to
implement the Plan.
No Adoption of Plans/Strategies Prepared by WRCOG - The City would not utilize the
Air Quality Implementation Program in developing and implementing air quality measures
to meet AQMP requirements. The City would also not participate in the Growth
Management Plan which depends on the voluntary cooperation of local governments.
Implications:~
City Participation and Influence on Rel~ional Plannim~ Efforts
Leadership Role - The City would incur direct costs (travel, City staff assistance, etc.) and
opportunity costs associated with taking a proactive role in the WE, COG. The time
commitment required in leading regional planning activities would necessarily mean less
THE PLANNING CENTER
35
Regional Planning Issue Paper
January 1992
CITY OF TEMECIH~ General Plan Program
City
time available by elected officials and staff in City government activities. On the other
hand, this alternative enables the City to exercise maximum influence on the COG and on
the nature of regional cooperation, governmental organization and planning. The net result
of this role would more likely be to the City's long-term benefit than the other alternatives,
although it may incur short-teE costs or disadvantages.
Active Participation - This alternative would also involve a substantial time commitment
for City officials and staff, however, to a lesser degree than the Leadership Role alternative.
The City would not be setting direction for the COG in terms of its projects or its position
on legislation affecting local and regional governance. Through active participation in
various task forces, however, the City would still be able to influence the plans and
recommendations.
Limited/Selective Participation - The City's level of participation would vary overtime
depending on the extent of local priorities and on the relevance of the WRCOG activity to
the City of Temecula. The City would not be assisting in the development of all proposed
plans or strategies, and therefore, the City may not agree with the proposed products. To
the extent the City is committed to increasing regional cooperation and planning, this
alternative may severely limit the City's steps in this direction.
No Participation - Given the size of Temecula and its role of Temecula as a regional center
for commercial and employment uses, this alternative would affect the overall success of
regional planning in Western Riverside County. Furthermore, the City would not benefit
from the joint planning efforts to address legislative mandates related to air quality and solid
waste management.
Imvlementation of Regional Policies and Plans
Adoption of Plans/Strategies Prepared by WRCOG - Both the Air Quality
Implementation Program and Growth Management Plan are still being finalized. Although
this would be the most cost-effective alternative for the City, it is too soon to adopt this
approach.
Tailoring of Phns/Strategies Prepared by WRCOG - Under this approach, the City
would essentially critique and test the regional plans against the goals, policies and
strategies of the General Plan. Through the process of preparing an Air Quality Element
for the General Plan, the City would utilize the scope of the WRCOG's Model Element to
ensure compliance with the 1991 Air Quality Management Plan. When preparing the
Growth Management Element of the General Plan, the City would incorporate the provisions
of WRCOG's Growth Management Plan that the City believes it could realistically carry
out given its own development objectives and the degree of cooperation that could be
achieved with surrounding jurisdictions.
THE PLANNING CENTER
36
Regional Planning Issue Paper
January 1992
CITY OF TEMECULA General Plan Program
Limited Support of Phns/Strategies Prepared by WRCOG - This alternative would
require a change in City direction regarding support for regional cooperation. A lack of
commitment in regional planning by the City would come at a time when state and regional
planning efforts are receiving strong political support from government and business.
No Adoption of Phns/Strategies Prepared by WRCOG - Under this approach, the
planning and financing for some facilities and services would be done on a local basis only.
This approach would be the most costly alternative and would not result in the highest level
of services possible for Temecula residents. Furthermore, given Temecula's economic and
social position in the region, this alternative would substantially hinder the effectiveness of
regional planning efforts by other jurisdictions.
Recommendations:
The City could be subject to considerable pressure from other local govemments, including the
county, if it chooses a very independent direction. The City's energy and resources would be
better used to remain involved and fight battles, if necessary, in an overall cooperative and
collaborative mode. The City should take the strongest role possible at a policy and staff level
within the WRCOG, principally because: 1) the City has much to lose if others dominate the
direction; 2) the City has greater resources than many other members; and 3) the impact of the
plans and strategies may be evident sooner than in other jurisdictions due to the development
activity in Temecula.
It is also recommended that Temecula tailor the Air Quality Program and Growth Management
Plan to meet specific needs and local circumstances. The City should examine draft regional
plans in a "check list" fashion to document the degree to which the'goals, policies and strategies
of regional plans are reflected or reinforced in Temeeula's General Plan. Temecula will be
looked upon to play a leadership role in many WRCOG activities due to its dynamic growth
potential compared to other WRCOG jurisdictions. Therefore, Temecula has a responsibility to
be creative in seeking implementation of regional plans and strategies. The City has a prime
opportunity to further the strategies of the Air Quality and Growth Management programs
through its relationship with landowners seeking to develop in the Study Area. Temeeula's
leadership role can result in a more marketable and efficient pattern of development than is
traditionally the case in other urban expansion areas.
THE PLANNING CENTER
37
Regional Planning Issue Paper
January 1992
ITEM 3
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN
CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN
EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOF, S RESOLVE,
DETERMIArE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been
audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amounts of
$599,302.51
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 14th day of April, 1992.
ATI~_,ST:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
3'~q. eee 247
STATE OF CALrFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
C1TYOFTEMECULA )
SS
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. 92- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 14th day of April 1992 by the following roll call vote.
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
June S. Greek, City Clerk
3W. ssos 247
CRY OF TEMECULA
03/20/92 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
03/30/92 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
04/03/92 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
03/26/92 TOTAL PAYROLL:
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 4/14/92 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
031 GENERAL
016 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUND (RDA)
019 TDSD
021 CAPITAL PROJECT,S-CRY
029 CAPITAL PROJECTS-TCSD
PAYROLL:
031 GENERAL (PAYROLL)
019 TCSD (PAYROLL)
TOTAL BY FUND:
PREPARED BY KARMA MCINTYRE
I, MARY JANE I~'Y, FINANCE FIC
MARK OC ENDUS~, ASSISTANT C MANAGER
S45,483.18
$3,100.00
$1,936.26
$72,932.45
$19,025.02
,HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
,HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
, Skation:
Fiscal Year: 1992 Check Register
Check Date Vendor Naee
Invoice Date P/D Date Descriotion
Gross ~iscount Net
0000~598 0M17192 PRICESEC PRICE SECURITY SYSTEISS
011192 0II151t2 0511Ile2 SECLBITY GRAND OPEN TEEN CTR
00009599 0II17192 DEDS&THR SEDS & THREADS
011392 01/13192 113f2
Check Totals:
0TII3R2 SOFA i LOVESEAT;TEEN CEMTER
:'Check Totals:
0MIIIt2 ENTRTIffiE)~IGRAffi) OPEN/TH CTRT
00009601 05111192 TARGET TARGE'T STORE
011592 01113192
~herk Tofa!~
PRIZES F~ ~ OPENING
00009604 0M20192 ASCON
Check Totals:
ABCOH SERVICEG~ INC,
o~loq/q? 11~o o?1141q? TFHP-~F9V-F1eSe~F IF ~/~!q2
02124/92 11550 02/14/r2 TEOP,SERV.FINMICE NE 219192
Check. Totals: .....
00009605 0~/20/92 ARTESIA ARTESIA INPLEENT
020192 02/01/92 02/01/92 lIT CHG
00009606 05/20192 ASCOH
11601-3
Check Totals:
~CQN HASLER HAILING SYSTBS
n~L1M92 0~16192 REpt;NI~.~Tt~E..FUIID.
Check Totals:
00009607 ~/20/97 C~T. BJILP_~ poTNT~DEINAP~L-INC.
051292 0M12t92 05112192 ANTI VIRUS SOFTMARE
Check-.Totals:
00009608 0M20/92 COUNTYGS COUNTY DEPT OF PURCHASING/GSA
129479 02/01/92 02101/92 OFFICE SUPPLIES
O0009&O~ 05120192 DAVLIN DAVLIN
................ 89-25:160 0Ml1/92.11541
Check Totals:
02125192-TAPE-COUNCILI*~IIOI-92 ...........
0000110'0M20192 DNV
051992
Check Totals:
OEp~TENT---~-~TOR~E~CLES
05119192 01119192 LICENSE SIPASSEN6ER VAN ak
00009611 05/20192 GFOA
051192
£heck IotaIs:
6OVl FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC,
05111f92 0IIl1/92 GUIDE TO FUND DALARCE
Check Totals:
00009612 05/20/92 GLENfilES GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCTS
............. 9151>0 05/10/92 ~1542- 0310~192 BINDERS
96880-0 05109'~2 11342 05/05!~2 LABELS
00009615 05/20/92 GONZALES OUAN 6ONZALES
030592 01/05192
Ch~cK Totals:
0M05/92 SPONSOR AC[NOWLEDSE SIGN
112,00 0,00
132.00 O.00 I~2.00
645.42 0,00 645.42
645.42 0.00 645.42
100.00 0.00 ~00.00
]00.00 0.0o ~0o.oo
60.00 0.00 60.00
60.00 0.00 60.00
17s,00 0...0.0 __125.0L---
800.00 0,00 800,00
...... 925.00 JOJ)O ........ 925,00 ....
12,64 0,00 12.H
12.64 0.00 12.64
4,000.00 ............ 0..00 ........4,000J~
&,000.00 0.00 4,000,00
68,57 0.00 ~,57
68.57 O,O0 ........... 68,57
89,90 0.00 89,80
89,80 0,00 BO,M
· 612.71 .......... 0.00 ......... '612.71 -
612.71 0.00 612,71
55,00
12.62
0.00 55.00
0,00 I2.62
12.62 0.00 12,62
4L25 0,00 4~,25
10L84 O.O0 109.84
15:,09 0.00
50,00 0.00 50,00
.... 0 ;3120 R2 ......
Fxscai Year: 1992
Check Register
Check Date Vendor Naee
Invoice Date P/O Date Description
--- Pa~e:- 2
Station: 3569
Discount Net
Check Totals:
00009614 03120192 6RAY BAR BRAY OAR ELECTRIC
159~22~42 01104192 ZI29Z 02/O71~JfJ,FJ~IOE ENCLOSURE
50,00 0.00 50,00
]lB,QO 0.00 -~18,BO ....
00009615 0S/20192 6TFBILL 6TE
197-5954H 03101192
Check Totals=
03101192 714-197-SBMIlIR OILLIMB
318.80 0,00 318,8e
47,89 0,00 47,8t
00009616 03/20192 HANKSHAR HANKS HARDHARE
1~512,l 0,l/13/92
Ch~ck Totals:
03113192 NATERIALS UPGRA)E SPORTS PARK
41,8~ 0,00 47.8t----
84.31 0,00 84.31
Check Totals:
00009617 03120192 HERETHAN HEET ~ANUFACTURIN6 COI~PANY
031092 0!110192 011L'OI-g2-.OZ-Xle~CT. ION_I}EROSIT..EEFUND
84.31 0.00 84,31
-19.&~ .......... 0.00 ....... 19.61. -
O000FII;1B-~I~I-92-HDFFNAN--3ENNIEER-HOEFHAN
0,11092 0,l/10192
Check Totals:
0,111~/92 REFUNDICANCELLFJ) 6YH CLASS
19.61 0.00 19.61
4L~ O,OO 4~.00
00009619 03/20192 ICNARETI ICH~ RETIREHEHT
032092 03120192
........ 0,12092=2--0,I120192
Check.-~tals:
03120/92 aAN 92/REISIUE CKtt148
JI313)J_q2-SEP-T-91ZP~.tSUE cr. isoe5
--4LO0 ........ 0o00 4~,00
11,189.67 0,00 11J89.67
.... ~914.21 O.OO ...... 9,914.21-
-bOOO962~_O312O/-t2-JENNACO_JENIffiCO
2375 03/05/92 11381
Check Totals:
03105192 SCRUB & MAX KITCHEN FLOOR
21,103.9B 0.00 21,103.88
50.00 0.00 50.00
00009621 0,l/20/92 LEASUE
212392
Cherk Tnfa|S:
LEASUE OF CALIF. CITIES
02110192 02t10/92 ANNUAL DUES
_ 50,00 0.00.__ ~0`00 -._
4,867,00 0`00 49867,00
Check Totals:
00009622 03120192 HAURICE HAURICE PRINTERS QUICK PRINT
24177 O,llJ~/~? ~_1~5,l 02124192 E~BERSHIP CAI~;TEEN CFMTER ....
Che~k' Totals:
000096~ O~!?OZ92-1(CT-IGHEJJOHN~CT3GHE.&_ASSOCIATES
920309 02/04/92 0278 09/01/91ANAL~CLARE~ONT Hcr~NNA 2/04/9
4~867.00 0.00 4,867.00
17b.Z1 0.00 17~.7~
176.71 0.00 176.71
117.S,l 0.00 117.33
00009624 03120192 HHASC
031992
Check Totals:
HUNICIPAL HGHT ASSIST. OF S,C
03/19/92 03/19/92 E~BERSHIP REHENAL
....... J~L$3 0,00 117,33---
40.00 0.00 40,00
00009625 0~/20/92 MOOREPEG PEG ~OORE
0224~2----02124/92
Check Totals: 40.00
-02f24192-EX~ENSE-REIH9-LOCC-2119-2121 ....... 154.21 .........
0.00 40`00
0`00 .......... 154.2I .-
Check Tot~ls:
...... 0000962~ 03t20/92 PERSRETI PERS EHPLDYEES' RETI~EHENT ....
2RERR,7i 0,l/12/72
0~12;2 C~/l~~
00009627 0,l/20!92 PRESSENT PRESS ENTERPRISE
022~92 02/29!92 10927
0~I12/92 Normai PaYroll
03i12/g2 RETIREMENT WE ,II12/92
Check Totals:
10/02191 ADS EHPLOY 2i09,2/16
154.2!
25~.17
!'l,227.70
13,480,87
275.42
0.00 154.21
0.00 253.17
O.O0 13,227.70
0,00 13,480.87
0.00 275.42
Fiscal Year: 1992
Check Date Vendor Name
Invoice Date PIO
Date
Check ~eglster
Description
Discount
Star;on:
Net
Check Totals:
OOD09L2B.O31?nlB? PRrLcFq~T PR~Fr~SZDllL TRAIN. A~-cUl~-
221510 02/18/92 11~2l 02118192 ONE YR,SUBSC,PRACTICAL SPRVSR
275.42
48,00
0,00
0.00 48.00
00009629 03120192 GUllLIlT
1010
QUALITY TONER SL~PLY
03106192 113Q7 02125192 RE~ LASERaET IXISI CART.
iLOO. .____0,0~ .... 48.00__
225,00 0,00 ?.25.10
Cheer Totals:
0000%30 03/20192 R.B,EXPR R.B.EXPRESS ~ESSENGER SERVICE
022892 02/98197 OlOb 1111~!91PIC[-UP & ~1 FEB.
225,00
125,00
0.00 225,e0 ·
_Q,O0 ..... 125,10 ._
Check Totals:
NeO~A.~l_03/2Dlq? RN~-_CN._RAN-_CAL_~NLLTDRTN ~mPpLy
4934 02/28/~2 11370 02/27192 MULTI-FOLD TONLS;MTHROO~S
125,00 0.00 125,10
56,01 O,OO 56,11
0000%32 03/20/92 RAN-TEC
006982
.ChecLTo~als:
RAN-TEC RUBBER STAffP ~8
03/10R2 11142 12116191 RUBBER SINe; MAYORS SIGN.
5b,01
10,78
0.00
56,01
10.78
Check Totals:
00009633 0~/20/92 RIVERSID RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
10b07,b-I elfillS? llxIB nxlO)/92 F~BFR~; Malt
106024-0 0~/06/92 11346 02/26192 OFFICE SUPPLIES; TCSD
00009634 0~120192 RDBERTS
031092
RARIA E. ROBERTS
03/10/92
0)/10/92 REIMB EXP COtIF.
10.78 0,00 10.78
. L,i' LeO 8.41__
150.85 O,O0 150.t5
..J59,26 LOO .......... J~,026--
154.98 0,00 154,98
00009635 03120192 RDDRESUE JOHN RODREBUEZ
0316~
Check Totals: 154,98
flitFAR; EFTfiR 42,00
0.00 154.98
0.00 ..........
Check Totals: 42,00
O0009b~ OX/?OI97 ~F£URITY SF~URTTY PACTFTC NATIONA? BAN '.
08646 03104192 0~104192 47980200000108641FEB CHBS 421,00
08230 03104192 0~I04192 4798p20000010823/MARCH 6HG 10,00
4?A?R 03tOJJq2 ~3/041q~ 479BD20000914~AtlFEBINA~,CHBS, .... 348.2~
0.00 42.00
0.00 421.~0
0.00 10,Q0
_Q,OL ......... )48,27___
Check Totals:
00~09~X7 03/?0/97 ~HEBAERA RHFRATQIL.EP, NID HARBOR TSIAN5
0~1992 0~/19/92 0~119192 HOTELICSCI4122-41241SN
031992-1 03/19192 0~119/92 HOTELICSCI4122-41241Dfi
779.27 0.00 779.27
19L00 0.00 ltB.~
198,00 0,00 198,00
396,00 0,00 396,00
tO,D0_ ..... G,DO ..... ~OJ)~._
0000%38 03/20/92 SIRSPEED SIR SPEEDY
4869 01104/9~
Check Totals:
O?/??/9~.P, EPuEORAIIOILDE
~EI~Y, AEPJjC.
Check Totals:
0000963~ 0~/20/92 SO CAL-2 SO.CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE CO ........
349-34~9H 03/2~/92 03/2~/92 714-349-3439/r~RCH BILLING
345-74180 0~/23/92 03/23R2 714-345-7418/HARCH BILLING
5~5-7419H 0~/251V2 03/25R2 714-~45-7419I~ARC~ BILLING
349-54580 05123/92 03125!92 7!4-549-34381~ARCH BILLING
90.00 0.00 ~0.00
59.0~ 0.00 39.09
7&.5~ 0.00 "~9
55.46 O.OO .,,46
95,71 0.00 95.71
Check Iotais:
264,8S 0.00 264,95
Fiscal Year: 1992
Check Register
Check Date Vendor Name
Invoice Date P/O Date Description
00009640 03/20/92 TEKCULAT TERECULA TOMNE ASSOC
030392 03~03~92 0227 07101191 ~TG HALL RENT;CLEAN FU/KAR
6ross Discount Net
.... ~-_-~-~-,-~,,-~,~,__ ............ ~___
435.00 0.00 435.®
Check Totals:
00009641 03/20/92 TENECDO0 TEPIECULA DOOR &TRIN
Oil?q? nlltD!q? Olll~lq? rONPFR~T~M ImBRBI)F/qPORTS PRt
435.00 0.00 '4~5.00
00009642 03120192 TENrqS
031692
Check Totals:
TEECULP VALLEY NI~H S~0~
03116192 0~/16/92 FUNDING tIPPROVED BY COUNCIL
211.95 0.00 211.95
2,000,00 O.O0 2,000.00
Check Totaloe
0000964~ 03/20192 TENVLYL~ TEECULA VALLEY LItlNATE, INC
1270 0;!17/92 11404 03113/92 LAflINATE CDUNTERTOP;COWCUSDN
2~000.00 0.00
790.00 0.00 790.00
00009644 03/20/92 TONNCTR
Check Totals:
TOWN CENTER STATIONERS
o~ls?/q~ 11~Rb O?/l~f~? firFIeF ~UPRTFR;DUTInTNG
790.00 0.00 790,00
Check Totals:
00009645 03/?0/92 U~IGLOBE UNTBsnBE DUT_T~..RFTEEn TRAVF~
0~1292 03/12/92 0~/12/92 TICKETS/LOCC/MAR 26-27 PD,PN
IS.64 0,00 13,64
396.00 0.00 396.00
check Totals:
00009646 03/20/92 UNITO6 UNITD6 RENTAL SERVICE
8772570306 03106/92 11180 12/1)191UNIFD~ RENTALS TCSD 03106192 12.50
8772.5202290~12819~ 111110 I21131911NIFOP,~LRENIt~LS.~CSO02/28/_~2__ 12-50
.0.00 39A.00 ....
O.OO 12,50
O.OO
Check Totals:
__00009~47 03120/92 URBENTCA URGENTCARE_!iFJ)XCALCENIER
46020 03116192 03/16/92 PHYSICAL/DMV EXAM
25.00 0,00 25.00
66.00 0.00 66.00
00009648 03/20/92 USCM USCM
2PTRT,71 03112/92
3P_.T_RT_7{ OXlI?/g2
Check-Iot~!s~
03112192 Normal Payroll
03117t99 NOrmal PayrO])
66.00 _0.00
40.94 0.00 40.94
40,94 o,OO 40,94 .....
Check IotaIs:
---O0009b4LO312OI.9i. VANDDRP_~ANDO!~.E_CHOU_ASSOCIAT!ON.
4636 02/28/92 02/28192 PLAN CKS FOR FEB 92
81,88 0.00 81,88
329.07 0,00 329,07
Check Totals:
00009650 03120192 WILLDAN WILLBAN ASSDCIATES
4004213 02115/92 02/15/92 JAN SERVICES/B&S
Check Totals:
00009651 0~/20f92 ZIBLER BAIL ZIGLEA
0~1692 ..... 03116/-92
.... ~29,07 __. O~OQ ......
158,00 0,00
158,00 0,00
0~116/-92 REFRESHENTS-FOR BRAND OPEN ......... 180.00 ....... 0.00 ......
158,00
158.00
180,00
00009652 03/20i~2 6FOA
031692
O000%53 0~I20/9~ LEAGUE
031992
Check Totals:
BOUT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC.
03/16/92 03/16/92 RENEWAL BAAFR
Check Totals:
LEAGUE OF CALIF. CtTIE3
03/19t92 031!9!92 CONFERENCEi4122-4124IS~,DH
IBO.O0 0.00 180.00
40.00 0.00 40.00
40.00 0.00 40.00
300,00 0.00 300.00
Fiscal Year: 1992 ChecL ie.oister Station:
Vendor
Invoice
)4ale
P/O Date DescriDtion
Check Totals:
Re~grt TotalL
Sross
55,27~.57
])iscount Net
O.O0 :300.00
0.00 ---,~.27,~ .......
ReDart Nriter CHEC[ LISTING BY FUND Station:
FUND CHECK NU~ER CHEC[ DATE VENDOR NAHE DESCRIPTION AHOUNT
001 00009&04 03120192 ARCON SERVICES+_INC. ]EHP,SERV,FZNANCE ME 2123R2 ..... BOO,(
001 00009604 031201t2 ASCON SERVZCES~ [tIC, TERP,SERV,FINANCE E 318192 125,(
:f"' 001 00009606. 03/20192 AGC~ HAGLER NAILING SYSTE~ REPLENISH POSTAGE FUND 4,000,(
On10n00~607 03170/92 CrMTRAI POINT ~nrTiner I~C- ANT~ vIEU~ ~F.T~iA~
001 00009609 03120192 DAVLIN TAPE COUNCIL/3/10/92 61~,:
OO~ 00009611 03120192 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC, GUIDE TO FUND BALANCE
001 O0009At~ O~!tOle/2 gtFMNT;~ ~FFXCF PR~DUCTg RIN~;~
! O01 00009612 031201f2 '6LEIIIES OFFICE PRODUCTS LASELS 109,l
' 00! 00009614 0~!20192 .b'RAY'~AR ELECTRIC TELEPHONE ENCLOSURE 318,~
nnl O00OQAI5 0112J)lrr/ 6T~ 714-1q?-S8511N~R R|ll IMG 47,I
001 00009617 03/20192 HENET NANUFACTURIN6 COHPANY OT iNSPECTION DEPOSIT REFUND 19,t
001 00009619 03120192 ICHA RETIRENENT SEPT 911REISSUE CKIB085
001 00009619 031~01q'2 ~CNA R~TIBEhlENT 3AN 921RRGSUE CKI9148 1.Z+189,1
001 00009619 03120192 ICI~A RETIRENEIrr SEPT 911REISSUE C[IBOB5
001 00009620 01/201Q2 ~ENNACD SCRUB & MAX KITCHEN FLOOR 50,(
~ol ooooqA?t ~1?01g') I F~IIIIF ~F ~LIF. ~[TIF~ ANNUAL_J)UFS 4,~7,(
001 00009625 0~120192 OOHN RCTIBHE & ASSOCIATES ANRL;CLARENDNT NcKENNA 21H/9 117,2
001 00009624 03120192 NUNICIPAL RGRT ASSIST, OF S,C EMBERSHIP RENENAL
00i ObOODk?5 0~!?0/9~ PEG ~nnRr E%PENSE RRNR H]CC_2JI-9:2Z2.1
001 0000%26 0~120192 PERS ENPLOYEES' RETIRERENT RETIREENT ME 31121rl2 1,972.(
001 0000962& 0~120192 PERS ERPLOYEES' RETTREENT Normal Payroll
__DOL__0000.9/,26 ~Z20132__ PERS.E!tPLOYEEEJETIHEIIE!iT RETiRBEN~.WE ~/12/9~ .......
OOZ 00009627 03/20192 PRESS ENTERPRISE ADS EHPLOY 2109~2/16 275,~
OOI 0000%28 03/20/92 PROFESSIONAL TRAIN, ASSOC INC ONE YR,SUBSC,PRACTICAL SPRVSR
0o1 o0009&79 OSZ2.OZO? QUALIZYTDNEILSUPRY ..... RECHARGE LASER3ET._IIISI.CART ......... 225,(
001 00009630 03/20/92 R,B,EXPRESS NESSENGER SERVICE PICK-UP & DEL FEE, 92 125,(
001 0000%31 0;/20/92 RAN-CAL ~ANITORI~ SUPPLY RULTI-FOLD TDNLS;DATHROORS 56,(
~-- 00~ 000096,~2___03/201t2 ......... :_ RAN~TEC_RUBOER. STA~. NF6 ............... RUORER.STANP; NAYORSSIOR ................
001 000096~3 03/20/92 RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY FOLDERS; NALL CLOCK; BIIiDERS S,z
00~ 00009634 03/20/92 HARIA E, ROBERTS REIHD EXP CONF, ~54,~
.001 000~6;5.5___.0;5/20Z92 30HNJ~ODREGUEZ tULEAGEREIHR
001 0000%3& 03120192 SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL DAN 47980200000142621FEDINAR CHGS
001 0000%3& 03/20R2 SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BAN 4798020000010923/~RCH GHG 10,(
00~ ~0009~6__-03J-20192 SECURT_Tv PAC~F[C_NEIDNALJAN__ ~980200o~O!O~H!~EBJ:HGS ........... 421,(
001 00009638 0~/20/92 SIR SPEEDY PERFORATION OF E~LOY,APPL/C, 90,(
001 0000%$9 03120/92 SO,CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE CO, 714-345-74191NARCH BILLING
O01_J)OOOD&39__O3Z20192_. SO.EALIFBRNI~ TELFPHBNF CO ...... 714-_3JD~q~/MECH._B/LLiNG
001 00009639 05/20R2 SO,CALIFORNIA TELEPH0NE CO, 714449-34391NARCH BILLING
001 00009640 03120/92 TEECULA TONNE ASSOC HTG H~L RENTICLEAN FEBINAR 435,(
001 00009H2 ...... 03/.20192 .......... TEHECULA_VALLEY_BZGH. SCHOOL .... FUNDINSJiBOEOVEI).JY COUNCIL ...... :_._2~OOO,(
001 0000%44 03/20/92 TONN CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIESIOUILD]NG & SF
00! 00009645 05/20/92 UNIGLOBE BUTTERFIELD TRAVEL TICKETS/LOCC/NAR 26-27 PB~PH 396,(
~o~ oo009~4B 03/~0t97 U~CN NormaLhyra11
001 0000%49 03/20192 VANDORPE CNOU ASSOCIATION PLAN CKS FOR FED 92 329,~
001 00009650 03120192 MILLDAN ASSOCIATES 3AN SERVICESlD&S 159j
OOl 00~09~57 OIl?OR? GO~/LFJJtANCLOEEICERS.AOSOC ..... JIENENAL 6AAFR .......................... 40,~
001 47,254,~
019 00009398 0;/17/92 PRICE SECURITY SYSTENS SECUR]TY GRAND OPEN TEEN CTR
01~ 00009599 0~/17/92 BEDS & THREADS SOFA & LOVESEAT;TEEN CENTER 645,,
~-01~j0009600 - 0~I17R2 ...... ~AES ~cKENZIE .... ENTRTNHENT/ORAND OPEN/TN CTRT
019 00009601 03/15!92 TARGET STORE PRIZES FOR GRAND OPENING 60,!
01~ 0000%05 0~120!~2 ARTESIA IHPLENENT INT CHS 12.,
0i~- 00009608 05/20R2 COU~T~' ~..OF PURCHASINS/GSA OFFICE SUPPLIES
019 00009610 05/20/92 DEPARTE~l OF ROTOR VEHICLES LICENSE B/PASSENSER VAN ak 55.~
019 0000%!5 03/20R2 JUA~ SONZALES SPONSOR ACKNONLEDSE SISN 50.,
.... 01~ .O000%lB -0Z/20/92 ~EN~IFER HOFFNAN . REFU~/CANCELLED 8Y~ CLASS 45.
Report irLter
FUND CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATE
VENDOR NANE
CHECK LISTING bY FUND
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
01L..000096Lg.__ 0312019~
019 00009622 0~120192
019" 00009626 03120192
0]q 0000963:3
019 000096T7 0;/20/92
019 0000965? 03120192
0iq n000961q
019 00009H6 05120192
0~9 00009&~ 05120192
01~ 00009647 0~120PI2
019 00009648 03120192
019 000096~1 05120192
019 000096~ 0~/20192
019
029 00009616 05/201~2
029 00009641 05120192
.02LOOOOgb&~
029
ICqA R~TIRFIqFNT
I(AURICE PRINTERS BUICK PRINT
PERS F, le~OYEES' RETIRERENT
RlVlq~311)r DFFTP-c ,qIPPt v
SHERATON 6RAND HARBOR ISLAND
SHERATON BRAND HARBOR ISLA!e
SO,C~t IFOIII~, TEt, FP~"F CO,
UNiTB~ RENTAL SERVICE
UIIITO6 RENTAL SERVICE
USCM
~IL ZI6LER
U:aSUE OF Cat IF, CITIES
.S~T_9.11RFTg~F ~tBOB5 ............. .J.,615,2,j.
HE~RERSHIP CARDSiTEEN CENTER
RETIREENT lIE 3112192
nnTCE $UPPLTrSI TCSD-_-
HOTELICSC!4122-41241DH
HOTELICSCI4122-41241SN
794-345-149qlWl%eq,'14 ;T~LIM6
UN]FOR~ RENTALS TCSD 0212B!92
UIiIFOR!t RENTALS TCSD 05106192
PRYSICAL/MV-E/AN
Noreel Payroll
REFRESHRENTS FOR BRAND OPEN
CONFFnEMCEI4/99-412&!.SIi~D!{
17~.7Z
150,85
198,00
199.00
12.~)
12.50
41.82
180 .oo
300,00-
6,952.66
HANKS HARDt~RE PdkTERIALS UPGRARE SPURTS PARK 64,3!
TEHECULA DOOR & TRIM CONCESSION UPGRADE/SPORTS PRK 21L,95
_JEECULA_VALLLY_J.A~NATL~HC .............. LARINATE_CQUNTERTUP~CDNCF, SSDN ..........299,00
1~086.26
55,273.57
Fiscal Year: 1992 Check Register Station: 3369
Check Date Vendor Nice
Invoice Date P/O Date Description Gross Discount Net
0O009602 03/18/92 OLS~/DO FINN. TOO[~ eARLET
03841~-92 031~8192 03118192 INLAND E!IPIRE BA6 ADS 7,195.00 0.00 7,195.00
0384r&4-92-03116192 O~9---.031iBIrI2.2FOURCgLORtl3 PG AH.IN ~ ...... 555.99 --- 0.00 555.99
384/34-92C 03118192 0339 02101192 PRO!IOTIONAL PROGRAIl FOR CITY 0.99- 0.00 0.99-
Check-Totatsm -~7,750.00 O.O0 --7,750.00
00009655 03123192 LEAGUE LEAAlE OF CALIF. CITIES
032392 03123192 03123192 REGISTRATIOIIIPLNIER$ IIGTITU 450.00 0.00 450.00
Check lotaim:
00009656 0312&192 RANCHOOV RANCHO OVERHEAD DOORS
1582 03120/92-Z1~1~ 03105192-ROLUNG DDOIlSICCI.IESSIOItlTCSD
450.00 0.00 450.00
850.00 0.00 850.00~ --
---OOOOta58.03/26/92 AROUNDA--ARQUND-A-BUCK
032692 03126/92
03126192
Check Totals: 850.00 O.O0 850.00
PICTURES FOR TEEN CENTER 5&.54 O.OO 56.54
00O09659 03/27/92 OLBONIDO FINAL TOUCH eARNET
0384/7-92 02101192 0339 02101192
............. 0384110-92 02101192 0339 .... 02/01192
0384/22-92 02101192 0339 02/0!192
0384/32-92 03103192 11415 02101192
............. 0384t11-92 02t01/92 0339 02101192
Check-Totals:
-- 5&.54 ........... O,O0 ........ 56,54-
PRONOTIONAL PRODRM FOR CITY 9,667.00 Q.O0
PRONOTIONAL PROORA~ FOR CITY- 1,750,00 .... 0.00
PR~OTIONAL PDODRN~ FOR CITY 13,55t.76 0.00
SALES TAX FOR SERV.OAN-FEB. 153.64 O,O0
PR~OTIDN~L PRDORAIt FOR CITY ......1,750.00 ..........O.O0
13,559.76
153.64
- 1,750.00 .... .
Check Totals: 26,880.40
-00009662-03130192 AGRICRED-AGRICREDIT-ACCEPT~CE CORP.- ...............
91000&2 03101192 0230 10101191LEASE;FURGERDON TRACTOR 1YR. 846.02
O.OO 26,880.40
0.00 846.02
Check Totals: ................. 84&.02
00009663 03/30/92 AIRCOND! AIR-CONDITIONIREFRIG.IISTITUT
032692 03126192 03126192 SUBSCRIP FOR CERT ERUIP DIRCT
Check Totals:
00009664 03130192 ALEXANDE ALEXANDER HANILTON INSTIT.INC
....... 5869060 - 03110192 ...........03110192 24 ISSUES DF-I~OR'S LEGAL DULL-
16.00
16.00
- -45.&0
.... O,O0 .... 8~.02
0.00 16.00
O,OO 16.00
O.OO 45.60
Check Totals: 45.60 O.O0
----O0009&a5 03130192-ALLlED -ALLIED BARRICADE
12137300 03110192 0358 02113192 BATTERIES FOR BARRICADES 241.36 0.00
121374-00 03110192 11267 01/31192 SPECIAL SI6NSIHARDNAREIINSTAL 56.03 O.O0
Check Tatals: 297.39 O.O0
00009666 03/30192 BEADOR DEADOR~ DAVID A.
0~2592 ....03/25192 .........03125192 PLAN CHEC[ FEE REFUND *--
45.60
241.36
56,03
29%39
........ 500.00 O,OO ...............500.00 ·
Check Totals: 500.00
03130192 tiCKNELL SICKNELL TRAVEL CENTER .............
2486 03/23/92 03126192 AIR ROUND TRIP TO SACRANENTO 118.00
0.00 500.00
0.00 118.00
......... Check Totals:
~_, 0000%68 0SI30192 OILLIARS SILLIARD'B AND ~AR STOOLS
031992 03,'19/92 03/26/92 SILLlARS SUPPLIES
11B.00 0.00 118.00
266.90 0.00 266.90
Check Totals:
00009669 03/30/92 DRAHBILA BRAHDIL~, HORTENCIA
REFUND 03/26192 0~12&t92 EVENT CANCELLED (S.D. ZDD}
266,90 0.00 266.90
26,00 0.00 26.00
03/30/92
Fiscal Year: 1~92
City of Teeecula
Check Register
Pa~e:
Station:
Check Date Vendor Name
Invoice Date PIO
Date hscription
-00009670 031~192 CADET---CADET. ONIFOI~
617822 02128192 10625
CMck Totals:
08109191RUSS;CTY HALL{I~LSilIASTE FEE
CIm~t-Totals:
00009671 03130192 CALlFOil CALlFilM
777-1989 02117192 10~2& 071Ql!fi PtBL,LGL M11:IPUI.COII!I-m--qICL
Check Totals:
00009672 03/30/92 CALIFRES CALIF. RESOURCE RECOVERY ASSIt
012692-----031261-92 03126/92-NMI&-ERBERSHIP
Check Totals:
--00009673-05130192-CARLMARR-CARL**NARREN4-CO.-
93099 03109192 03109192 SERVICES, ]TLEPI!i, DATA PRO
--Check-Totals:
00009674 03130192 CITY/INN CITY OF INDIAN ELLS
032492 03124192 03/24/92 CONFBEKCE ON 4/11/92
Check Totals:
00009675 03/30/92 COSTCO COSTCO NNOLESALE
032792
03127192~DqVIVCR&OA[-$TNg) FOR CONFR
Check Totals:
O00O967&-O$13OIt2-COUNTYCO COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE-CLERK-OF-.
030592 03105192 03105192 CHARDEICOPYIN6 OF RESOL 460
............... Check. Totals;
00009677 03130192 DAVLIN DAVLIN
89-23-162 03117/92 11286 02103192 AUDIO PROD,PLANRIIt COI~,
Check Totals:
00009678 03/30192 FRANKLIN FRANKLIN SEHIMARS '.
..... &8191541-- 02124192 11289 ..... 02111192 D]NDERSIREFILLS ..........
6ross Discount
26.00 O.O0
34.25 O.O0
34.25 -- -- 0.00 --
31.75 0.00
31.75 0.00
-35.00 O,O0
35,00 O.O0
384,88
~4,88
100 ,O0 0,00
lOO,OO O.O0
603.39 ....... 0,00
&03,18 O,OO
Met
26
3& .25
4.30 ..............O,O0
34.25 .....
31.75
31.75
35,00 ....
35.00
O.O0 384.88
0.00 ...........T~&.88 ·
100.00
lO0.O0
603.38 *
603
0.00
4.~O--
O.O0 152.61
O.O0 152.61
0.00 --- 5&.78-.
152.61
152.61
..... 56.78.-
Check ~otals: 56,78
00009679-.03130192 6ANAEFFI-6ANA EFFICIENCY-CERTIFICATION .................................
032692 03126192 03126192 SUSb'CRIPT FOR CONSINERS DIREC lO,O0
0.00 56.78
O.O0 10.00
Check--Totals: ........................10,00 ..........O,OO
00009660 03130192 6ETPtiED SET PAGED
0899876-1N 03110192 0228 07101191 12 PGRS;6-B&S;6-TCSD 212.50
Check Totals: 212.50
00009681 03/30/92 6FDA 60VT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSDC,
.............. 032692 03/26/92 ......... 03/26/92 'INVESTING PUBLIC FUNDS' Pt; ......... 36.32 -
iO,O0 --
O.Q0 212.50
O.OO 212.50
- - 0.00 ........
00009682 03/30/92 GLENHIES GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCTS
83t32-0 02/011t2 10794 09112191
83864-0 02101192 10794 09/12/91
0013720 02/06192 10794 09112!91
0013719 02106192 10794 09112191
Check Totals: 36.32 0.00 36.32
CARD FILES;FOLDERS;STANPS
CARD FILES;FOLDERS;STANPS
CREDIT REND 4482
CREDIT EItO 4482
19.40 0,00
93.10 0,00
2.20- O.OO 2.20-
18,62- 0.00 18.6~'
Check Totals: 91.be O,O0 91.&8
Fiscal Year: 1992 Check Rqister Station: 3569
Check Date Vendor Name
Invoice Date PIO
00009663 03/30/92 6TFJILL 6TE
1625595A H/16/92
162--&O63L-03/-16/92
Date Description 6ross
0~116192 MATS giLL
03116192-11ATS-SERV.ICE
3,345,es
Discount
Net
0.00 389.56
0.04 3,345.08
3,734 .~4
000496P _a3!~1~2 !lSNr~ H~Nr.S
128424 02103192 113/~ 021011~2 53.93
131590 02/21/92 11T~
Check Totals:
OPBI ACCOUIIT;tIISC, PUILIC liES
OPEN ACCOUNT;HISC,PtlLIC
0.04 3,734.64
0.04
Q .04 79.24
00049685 03/30192 ICHARETI IC!tA REI'IREIqENT
~DFCN,71 fi117992
032692 03126192
Check Totals: 133.17
03112/92 ilorul Payroll 516_57
03126192 RETIREBENT FOB RO OF IIARCH 10,004.04
0.04 133.17
0,04 516_~7
0.04 10,004.04
0D049686 03/30192 INSUPCO INSUPCH
2691-1 03/16192 11358
2692-1 03/18/92 11358
2692 03116192 11358
2691 03113192 11358
. 2690 -631131-92-,11358
Check-Iotah.' 10~;20.57 0.04----.10,H0.57 .....
02/27192 HARDflARE i CABINETS;PUB,MORES 5,66
02/2H-t2J~MARL&-MMETSJeULMORES 32,80
· 02127192 HARDtiRE & CABIIETS;PUB,ilORES 258.27
02127192 HARNIARE I CAJIMETS;PUB,MORKS 320.44
02127JFZ-HARDHARE-&-CABIMETS;PUB.MOR~ 268,26
0.00
0.04 -32,80
0.04 258.27
0.04 320.44
0, O0 - 268,2&
0400968TO]/.30192N.s. RILYNS-HARILYIr-S-COF-FTE-SERVZCE
2039 03116192 11413
2051 03123192 11413
00049686 03/30192 HARRIOTT HARRIOTT HOTEL
032092 ~3120/-92
Check Totals: 885,43
63/16/92 COFFEE SUPPLIES;CITY HALL 55,20
03116192 COFFEE SUPPLIES;CITY HALL 151,11
Check Totals: 206.31
03/20/-g2-CI,-CI~IES--PLRIIIERLIIISTITUTE -6&2,~
0.04 885.43
0.04 55,20
0.04 151.11
0.04 20L31
0.04 662,118 . -
-N)049~89-J3/3O~2-15CCAI:I:
0~10
Check Totals:
~CCAMN-~INTIN~ SERVICES
02126192 11214 12101191RONTHLY HEMSLETTER
662,88 0,04 662,88
268,30 0.04 268,30
Check--Tofals.:
00009690 03158/92 ~CIV, HANS IICHAHNIS FURNITURE
032092 03120192 05120192 TV Ale VCH
268.30 .........-0.04
B$1.99 0.04 861.99
Check Totals:
00049691 03/30192 RIHIONP HISSIN VALLEY POOLS i SPAS
021892 021~8192 02118192-PEWALT--ISSUELIN-ERROR%IIEFUND
861,99 0,04
T36.87
---O0009692.03150192-1elABC
032692
Check Totals:
.. RUNICIPAL~GNT-ASSIST+-OF_S.C
03126192 03126192 ONE YEAR HENBERSHIP
336.87 0.04 ~6.e7
40.00 0.04 40.04
00409693 03130192 NOBIL HOBIL
93037982 02111192
.... 930379~2 03111192
00009694 03/30/92.PAYLESS
1502
----Check-Totals:--
02111192 CREDIT CARD CHARGES
03111192 ~OBIL CREDIT CARD
Check Totals:
PAYLESS DRUG STORES
03104192 11031 10131191FILR PROCESSING;O&S;24EIPOSUR
-40,04 0,04
608,85 0,00
1,234.17 0.00
1,843,02 0,00
8.81 0.00
-40,04
608,85
1,234.17
1~843.02
8.81
Chock Totals: .....
8,81 0,04 8.81
05130192
Fiscal Year: 1992
City of ]eeecula
Check Register
PoSe: 4
Stationa 3569
Check Date Vndor Nan
Invoice hte PID Date hscription Gross
0000t695 03/34)!r2 PETTYC PETTY CASH
032792 031271rZ 031271~2 MSIIREIORIBSEENTFORTC~ 297,57
012692----~12&192 03126~t2-CASlt-REI~UR~31ENT40~--CITY ........ 302,M
Discmt
Net
0Hff696 03r30192 PmILOCK
031692
PRO LOCI( &-[EY
03116~/2 113~/
Check Totals** 600,11
03116192 CYLIJlBER LDCISISIi,CBITER SITE 75,00
0,00 600,11
0,00 75,00
Check-Tetals: 75,00
0004R697 031S0192 RNFTEC RM-TEC RU~ER STNIP NF6
007020 03117192 11371 03104192 N/IBq. ATES;PLRNIERS 49,13
75,00 .
49,13
00009698 o313ol92 RRNCHQBL RIdClIO BLIEPRIMT
40184 02/28~92-11300
Check Totals: 49,13
.n21117-92-BLLEJqiINTSFElilNEERIN6-SEP]. .--75,64
49.13
75.64 -
Check Totals: 75.t~i
0800969e,-03/30192 -RESENTS--RESEMT$-OF-UNIV.-OF-CALIF.
032092 03120192 03/271~2 ISSIES&TRENDI~F. LLO ROOS SIRIN 390.00
75,64
390,00
00009700 03/30/92 RESIDENC RESIDENCE INN
030592 o31o51r2
Check-Totals=
031051rZ m DPIilITER!rL CO SHOP CTRS
390,00--- O,O0 390.00 .....
124.20 O ,00 124.20
000~701 03130192 RIGHTMAY RIGHTMAY
---161041----02127192-11395
Check Totals: 124.20 O,OO 124.20
. 0212&I92*LAII;TRASII.COMTAIER!REIrl .......1,320.00 ........ 0.00 ..... 1,320
Check Totals:
00009.702 03/3~/-t2-ROltNCAT-ROIIRttCATHOLIC-BISHO~ OF SAN
032492 03/24/92 03~24~92 REFUN~ OF PARKSISERV ASSESS
1,320.00 0.00 1,320.00
1,598.80 0.00 1,598.80
Check-Totals:
00009703 03~30~92 SUARTS S & S ~RTS MID CRAPTS
878548 03/10192 11357 03102192 BRUSHES FOR PAINTIN6
....... 878543 ----03/IOI921135&--O31021V2-CONSTmJCTION-PAPER;PAINT ....
878540 03110192 11355 03102/92 CREPE PAPER;MARtYRS;GLUE
..... 1,598.00-- - 0.00 1,598.80 ~ --
141.35 0.00 141.35
........ 397,46 0.00 397.46
301,08 0.00 3Ql.Oe
00009704 03130192 SAFETYLI SAFETYLIME
8909 02/25192 11278
Check-Totals:
02105192 REFLECTIVE STRIPS FOR VESTS
839.89 0,00 B39,89 ....
64.78 0.00 84,78
Check Totals:
00009705 03130192 SECURITY SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BAN
4798010856-03104/92 ........ 03104192 SPle-STIINT
84.78 0.00 64,78
- - · 25,19 ..............0,00 ..........25.19 --
Check Totals:
---00009706 03130192 SENIOR--SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER ......
032492 03/24/92 03~24~92 CSF FUNDINS-SR CENTER
25.19 O.O0 25.19
10,000.00 O.O0 10,000.00
..................... Check Totals:
00009707 03/30192 SIRSPiED SIR SPEEDY
4763 02112192 11260 02101/92 BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATION
Check Totals:
00009708 03/30/92 SO CAL-2 SO.CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE CO.
000455 03/11192 113~4 03/05/92 BATTERY PRCK;ELINtMATOR
lO,OOO.OQ O.O0 10,000.00
140.48 0.00 140..
140.48 0.00 140.46
115.29 O,O0 115.29
Fiscal Year: 1992
Check Date
Vendor
Invoice Date
7143456005 03/07/92
· 7143493437 03/07/92
71434934,38-0,3/07192
7147458550 03107192
7143457422 03/07/92
714349343& 03107192
030792. 03107/92
Check Rqister
Kilt
PIO Date Description
03107192 CELUX.AR PielIE
03107/92 CEIJ.ULAR PHIIE
03/07192- i/LLULAR-JqlOME
03/07/92 CELLULAR PHONE
03/07/92 CELLULAR PHIXE
03/07/-~2 CELLULAR IqDIIE
03/07P/2 !:RLAR PIIQIE/IL[III6 2192
Page: 5
Station: 3369
Gross Discount Net
462.66 O.O0 462,66
113.73 O.OO 113.75
95.71 .......... O.OO
127,54 0.00 127,54
142,72 0,00 142,72
47,fi O.O0 47,83---
88,49 0,00 88,49
00009714 03130192 SOUTHrED ~ CALIF EDISON
665048085A 02112192
~,~40085J 021L2192
6&504BOriC 02/12/92
665048085602/12PJ2
&6504808~E-O2/X2/92---
665648085F 02112192
6658480856 02/12/92
66~4808~-02/12~92
6~50480851 02/26/92
604111093 02/01/92
-696780107--03/02/~2-
696781651 03/02/92
02112192 1717050712
02/J2/92 1717050712 6120 71_~
02112/92 1717050712 7122-1119
02112192 17170507:$2 8119-9/18
02/*12/92--Y:ILI*7.050112--tI18-10119
02/12/92 Y717050712 10/19-11/20
02/12192 1717050732 11120-12/20
0211-2192-Y71705073242120-~21~
02126/92 1717050712 1121-2121
02101192 2oe342eo7 12111 1111
0~1021-9245T~7116-1127-2126--
03102192 8814825 1127-2126
IT193~97 O~O0
331,74 o,oO 331,74
485.91 o,OO 485.91 i
448.56 O.O0 448.56
466.80 O.O0 466.80
4;$,27 Q,O0 43~.27~ -
383,16 O. OO 383.16
364.05 O,O0 364.05
~1,84 Q,O0 ~81,84 --- -
496,11 Q,O0 496,11
9.50 O.O0 9.34)
9,00 - 0,4)0 9,00 .....
257,04 0,00 257,04
519051802 03/05/92
519o59ool-o3105192-
57~001401 03109192
518061811 03109192
518132104 0~109192
538131120 03109192
51~050101 03~05~92
548286505 ~31101-92
548286503 03110192
538006659 03109192
----538oo6233-~3109~92
60411109~A 03118/92
551260500 03/11/92
604117670 ::03118192
667956482 0~105192
604117649 03/10192
-~604110011-03118192.
598025422 03/17/92
598025414 03/17192
~97994085-.0~/17/92
597994083 03117192
597992504 03117192
598051021--031171-92-
597992338 03117192
575656802 03113192
--57565093~ 03113192
575656701 03/1~/92
577802489 03/13/92
577808740 03/13192 .......
575663;24 03113192
577808742 03/13192
5~126754~ 0~/U/92 -
551267901 03/11192
548286404 03110/92
519055796 03105/92
03105192 M17012628 01/29-02128192 70.16
03105192--8685178-1129-2128 ................ 262 ,.7-7
03109192 20~34541 2101-3103
031{Y/192 3ON404~11 1131-3103
03/09~92-PON01008342-21014/03
03109192 P0826002910 2101-3/03
03105192 309020270 1/29-2/28
0~110/92-~8517678-214)1-~104
03/10192 308517677 2/03-3104
03/09/92 208166957
03109192-208,166940-210~--3103
031181~ 208342807 2111-3111
03111192 85768549 2104 3105
03118192-8695745-2111-3111192
03105192 85404510 1121 2/10
03/18192 ~08517215 2111 3/11
0.00 70.16
0.06 -- 262,77
~.61 0.00 ~4.63
9.68 O.O0 9.68
--262,55 O,O0 262.55
590,78 O.O0 590.78
74.77 O.OO 74.77
9,00 O.O0 9,00
9.00 0,00 9.00
9,30 O.Oo 9.30
9.~0 O.O0
8.88 0.00 8.88
9.00 O.OO 9.00
--- 8.78 O.OO 8.78--
6,25 O.OO 6,25
8.78 O.O0 '8.78
0~118192308517680*2111-3111.----
03118/92 ~8393819 2110 3110 8.78
03117/92 3113466 2110 3110 9.77
0;/-17/92~100917-2/Z0-3/11 .................... 9,82
03117192 203009275 1110 3111
03/17192 85750562 2/10 3111
--03117192-30847/~%9-21-1t-31-11--
03117192 20843OO94 2110 3111
03/13/92 85680663 2/06 ~/06
03/13/92-85694374-2/06-3/06
03/13/92 208404529 2106 3/06
03113192 856e9456 2/06 3109
03113192 300426227 2106 3109 -
03/13/92 708023136 2/06 3/06
03113192 300473761 2106 3109
03/11192 308465420 2104 3/05
03/11192 8797029 2104
03/10192 208360425 2103 3104
03/05/92 85642079 1129 2128
8.78 .......... -0.00
0.00 8.78
O.O0 9.77
0.00 --9.82
18.~ 0.00 18.6I
9.08 O.O0 9.08
8.78.- -0.00 -- 8.78
9.00 0,00 9.00
8,70 0.00 8.70
----.8,70 -0.00 6.70 ......
8.70 O.O0 8.70
9.60 0.00
-- 9.60 ..... O.OO .......9.&O
40.45 0.00 40.45
9,60 0.00 9.60
9.00 - --O.O0 9.00
9.32 0.00 9.32
11.07 0.00 11.07
9.00 0,00 9.00
Fiscal Yeen 1992
c~ty 01 leiecula
Check Register
Station: 399
Check Date
Vendor Nine
Invoice Date PIO Dike Description
519050812 03105192
ffTtfi$03 03117192
&O4110255--03Lt~J92
604111094 03/18/92
&04111095 03118192
594167107 031171fi
59i1M505 03117/92
5941t~e0 03117192
567351~75
538133201
~Qt~l 03/~1~
4~5157 O3/QI/~
4~51~ ~lOll~
4~5162 03/01/~
03105192 20~_~75 1/29 2128
03117192 85831429 2119 3111
031181~2-823351%-21~1-1/11
03118192 208078413 2111 3111
03118/92 8'ltiTTI 2111 3111
03117J922fi!116f~12110 3110
03117R2~5793322110 3110
03117192 857tA790 2110 3/10
03112/-~2-857~9053-2103
03109192 85767812 2101
0310~192 85~17t15 2101 3102
031ol/r~ uU)~-lliO2 Oll..n?/2~
03101/92 208-434543 Q1/31-02129
03/Q1/92 20H3&~69 Q1/31-03/29
03/Q1R2 8~-7t3809 Q1/31-02/2~
Q3/QI/92 8~-75~Q54 Q1/31-02/29
Q3/01/92 85472~55 01/31-02/29
.03101/92-208r4~--D1/31-02129
03101192
02101192 20~1357~ 8131-111301911dNR2
n_3!O11_92_B-_3HNi3.91.3~.III301fiiFE3-92 ........
03101192 8-b85179 01/31-02129
03101192 85-&74~07 01131-02129
Gross Discount Net
9.00 O.O0
8.79 O,OO ........ 8.79 ..-
8.78 O.O0 8.78
8.78 0.00 8.78
192,43 O,O0 192.43 ....
254 ,~ O,O0 254,~9
178.91 O.O0 178.91
41,49 O,O0 41,49 ....
189.81 O.O0 18~ .81
196.7/ 0.00 196.7/
31,19 0,00 3L.19 ,
31,57 O.O0 32.57
31,9o o ,oo 31,9o
32.35 O,O0 ~33_~ ....
72,59 O.OO 72.59
29.93 Q.O0 29.93
-3Q,Q9 O .OO 3O,Q~ ....=.
29,17 O.O0 2~.17
1~0,e9 0.00 150,0~
76,98 Q,OO 76.98 .-
28,38 O.O0 28.38
29.71 0,00 29,71
-92,21 ............O,O0 ........92,21
21,87 o.oo 21,07
38.8~ O.OO 30,89
4307.TJ185*--DI/01192
430,5248 03101192
430775269 03101192
4~QZT~Ia~--0,VOiLf2
430771383 03/01/92
430775161A Q2101/92
43077510L03101192
430775270 03101192
430775342 03101192
430775347 -03101192 ..............03101192-N105-IBS&9-01131-021291ft2*-
430775350 03101192 03101192 85-747396 01131-02129192
430776500 03101192 03101192 85.-767810 01131-02129192
___-4:~077/~506--03101192
430771465 03101192
43077146~A 02101/92
--4307*TZ466-Q3/OU92--
430771467 0~101192
~307714-66A 02101/92
-430171467A-O2JQII-92
430775200 03101192
430775&00 03101192
-031-01192-05'*7.93291-011*'j1*'021291-92.
03101192 430771465 01131-02129192
02101192 3-117722 8/31-111~0 & JAN 92
03101192 53'87~57 01111-02129192
02101192 53J/1301 8/31-11130 & OAR 92
02JQlli2-.%L'B7~57-iilO'-IILIOIVIMM-t2
03101192 02101"02129192
03101/92 02101-02129192
24.71 ......... -0.00 ...........2#'~--.
29.49 O.O0 2~.~,
132,35 O.O0 132.35
-- 15.29- -QJ)O 15,29 ......
17.16 O.O0 17,16
lt.74 O,OO 68.74
~,70 O. O0 56,70-- ....
13,201,76 O.O0 13,201,76
3,320,38 e.00 3,320,38
4~775195- 03101192 ..........03101192-208.4~9OR-OI!31-021291r12 ......... 32.91
4:$0775158 03/01192 03101/92 208-434540 01131-02,'29192 31.84
.Check..-Totals~ ....................24,7t9,44--
00009715 0~/30192 SPEEDYO! SPEEDY OIL CHNIDE
340 03119192 11268 021M/92 REPAIR I MINT.CITY VEHICLES 22.49
Check Totals: 22.49
00009716 03130/92 STEELIER STEEDER, [AREA
__0:~1792___03117-1.92 031-17J*g2-REFUND=gUILTill-CI. ASS.-- ---50.00
O,O0 ...........-32.91--
O,O0 31,84
O.O0 ..... 24,~19,44 ....
O.O0 22.49
O.O0 22.49
0.00 50.00-- --
--.O000f717--O$130192*ST[DALL- $TI6ALL,-DRE6ORY
031792 03117192
Check Totals: 50,00 O,O0 50,00
03117192 REFUND FOR GOLF CLASS 125.00 O.OO 125.00
00009718 03/30/92 SYSTEH2/SYSTEH 2190
128943 03116192 11324
00009719 03/30/92 TERECOPZ TERECULA COPIERS
.... 2152 02125192 11271
Check Totals: -- 125.00 --- O,O0
02120192 lINEPLATES; PIIELS 181.95 0.04)
Check Totals: 181.95 O.O0
02/11192 SERVICE;COPIER;FIR[ ~PT.17$ 75.00 O.OO
125.00
181
181.95
75.00
FZsca! Year: 1942
Check Dike Vendor Nlme
Invoice Date P/O
Date
Check Riglater
hscription
Gross
Discount
Net
Check Totals:
0000~720 03/30192-TERECULA TEHEC~A-CREEg-IUN
0317~2 03117192 03120192 TENET GRILL
75.00 0.00 75.00
24.01 0.00 24.01
00009721 0:3130192 TDGQS T_MBS.
0~0392 0:3103192 113B7
Check Totals:
0:3102192CATE]~INGOFP.M, IUHE[ lIT6
24,01
49.04
0.00 24.01 ......
0.00 49.04
Check Totals:
00009722 03/30192 TRAUNA TRAUNA [NTERVENTIUN PROGRNI,
032392 03123192 03123192 CSF FIWDIKG
Check Totals:
_0~XW._.72,3-031,30192. UNITOG-*-UMITOG-ENTAL-~:RVICE
8771570320 03/20/92 0331 12/10/91 UNIFDR~ RENTAL SERV.PUB.NDRKS
8771570313 03/13192 0331 12110191 UN[FORI~ RENTAL SERV.PUB.IIORKS
.*--81~7157030&D,V06192 O~l----12110191-UM]FORtLRENTAL-SERV. PL~.NDRICS
49.04
lo,ooo.oo
10,000.00
12.50
12.50
12,50
0.00 49.04
0.00 10,000.~ :.--
O.OO 10,000.00
0.00 12,50
0.00 12.50
O,OO-- 12,50 ....
0000-9724-0~130192 VIARS----VIARSrCARRIE
032492 03124192
Check Totals:
03124192 REFUND FOR ZOO TRIP
37.50 O.O0 37.50
13.00 0.00 13.00
00009725 03/30/92 MHITECAP MHITE CAP
F116904 02/13192 112;56
Check-Totals:
01129/~2 EOUIPt~EIfT FOR PaLIC MORES
13.00 0.00 13.00
205.67 O.O0 205,67
205.67 0.00 205.67
--.200,00 0.00-- 2OO,OQ..
200,00 O,O0 200.00
76.72 0,00 76.72
Check Totals:
00009726 03/30/92 iINDSORI MINDSOR PARTRERS-RANCHD IND -
040192 .,.04101192-0235 OTIOl/-tL-~YLRENT4-STDRAGF.-SPACE--
--00009727 ~I30/-92-ZEE
37162783
Check Totals:
ZEE-REDICAL-SERVZCE
03111192 11:352 0310:3192 ~EJlCAL SUPPLIES ACCOUNT
00009728 04/14192 ALLCITY ALL CITY NANASE~ENT
1291 03109192 0293 10108/91TPJEFI.C.CaTROL;RCND CAL.RDAD
Check Totals:
00009729 04/14192 ANERRENT AHERICAN RENT-A-FEKCE
16~&4--- 03f.921-92-11:328 021ZT/92-FTNCING;DELRID-RD.IE~PJRF.-C[
Check-Totals: ......... 76.72----
4,176.00
4,178.00
-2~240o00----
Check Totals:
OOOOc~730_04/14/92_~RKE,~.DURICE,..,WILLIANS_&.SORENSEN
08455 02/21/92 02121/92 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2,240.00
10,969.49
............. Check-Totals: .....
00009731 04114192 CORONA CORONA CLAY CO~PANY
10890 03/16192 1133b 02/24/92 HOUND ~II; TCSD
Check Totals:
00009732 04/14/92 COUNTYAD COUNTY OF R[VERSZD~
031192 03!11/92 03/20/92 F~RE DEPT SERV 10/91-12191
-- 10,969.49
1,146.46
1,146.46
122,378.38
Check Totals:
00009733 04/14/92 COUNTYPU COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE/SUPPLIES
122,378.38
O.O0-- 76.72 .....
0,00 4,178.00
0.00 4,178.00
O.O0- 2,240.00 -
0.00 2,240.00
0.00 10,969.49
-0.00 .......10~969.49----
0.00 1,146.46
0.00 1,146.46
0.00 122,378.38
0.00 122,:378.38
-03130192
FLscal Year: 1992
City of lenecula
Check Register
Page:
StatXu:
Check Date Vendor Name
Invoice Date P!O
14S096 0S117192 11340
143094 03117192 11~8
143095---0~1171~-I1339. --
Date Description Gross
03103192 FOLDERS;GLUE STICk;LEAD 202.~
0310U92 PEIi;!~ICII,8;I~I! PING;SHEARS ~&L68
O~IOU~-ST~PLBITAPE;RULER~IHI61tI. ITER ..... 783,91
Discout
Net
0.00
0.00
0.00 783.91
Check Totals:
0000973104LL4J.~2.E36ILCORE.q61!.-CIIatO~TIOM
5191192 02112192 021121T2 PLIiN CHECI(S FROIt 111-1/311T2
6191199 0.T101192 03101192 PLM tHEaS 211-2129192
1,551.92
1,119.~
2,360.Z~
0.00 1,551.92
0.00 1,119.~0
O.O0 2,7~0.2B
04114192 aEieiACO i
031092 03110lT2 ~T~
Check Totals:
~2/40/J2-~MI3ORI~igU~UIE--92
3,479.58
1,621.68
0.00 3,4~.58
O.O0 1,&21.68 ·
04~141-92-~EL~_n
030492
Check Totals:
.alElAD I ASSOCIATES
03104192 0:I38 03104199 PLAN CHECI~ING $ERVI~F.S
1,621.68
4,7T~.44
0.00 1,621.68
0,00 4,793.44
Check-Totals:
00009737 04114192 NGOREELE ROORE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTING
2460P 03131192 10997 10116191 INSTALL.BNG POLEG;CALLE CORTZ
4,793,44
8,90e.00
0,00 4,793.44 -
0.00 G,900.O0
Check Totals: 8,900.00
O0009TH 04114192 PLANNING THE PLANNING CENTER
15605--- -02/01/92 0271 07/01/91 PREPARATION;CITY-GENERAL PLAN---10~856.g6-
0.00 - 8,9~)0.00
0.00 10,D56.9~
00009719 04114!9? RAliI1EK RMTE[
~966 03117/~2 0350
3967 03118/~ OSGO
3967-~. 9!1181.92-03~) -.
Check Totals: 10,856.96
01129192 ROUTINE STREET 8AIJO'ENANCE ~,360.~5
01129192 ROUTINE STREET RAINTENANCE 13,585.83
OX/29/-99-Rm~NE-STBEEI-~XmENANtE 0,30-'
O.OO 10,8~&~"~
0,00 3,360.35
O.O0 13,585.83
0.00
Check Totals: 16,94Lfi
QOQOe~O-O4114/32-RIVERSID-RIVERSIDE-OF4:ICE-SUPP~
106076-0 03110192 11348 03103199 FOLJERS; ~ CL~; BINDERS 1,2~2.60
106075-0 03110/92 11347 0~103192 ENVELOPEG;CKCULATORS;LABELG 1,821.11
105610-1--OUI1192*I1~O1---O2118199CKCULATORS;-PEKK-LEAD ............ 91.05
10b075-1 03112/99 11347 0~10U99 ENVELOPES;CALCULATORS;LABELS 256.02
0.00 16,945.88
0.00 1,252.&0
0.00 1,8'Lt.ll
0.00 -91.05--.
0.00 256.02
Check-Totals:
00009741 04/14/92 ROBERTBE ROBERT BElN~ MR. FROST & ASSO
400257 02/20/T2 0342 01/02/92 EITENTIOR OF C.0.i0210-0284
2-1022-CR--02/20/99-0342 ..-OL/02/*T2-EITENT]ON-OF-C.O.t0210-0284
3,420.78*--
3,175.29
--75.29-
O.QO .... 3,420.78 ....
0.00 3,175.29
0.00 75.29-----
~OO9742-04LI4L¶~.-iilLLDAli--tILLDII-ASS~CIATES
40042~-2 03/20192 0348
40042~-1 03120192 0318
40042S~-~--03/20/99-0320
Check Totals: 3,100.00
0,00 3,I00.00
01129192 PR~AREREPORTG;LE6AL DEGCRIP 2,254.00 0.00
11119191 SB-821 PLAN CHEC[ 5,510.00 O.O0
03120/92-PLAN-CHECI-SENVICEG-FOR FEB92 297.00 ---0.00
/
Check Totals: 8,061.00 -. 0.00
Report Totals: .00
2,254.00
5,510.00
297.00 ....
9,061.00
315.2ff ',
Report Nriter
FOND CHECK HIJ~R CHECK DATE
ool oOODDb~? 03J. IB!V2
001 00009602 03198192
/" 001 00009602 03118192
\
001 00009655 0T!23192
001 00009659 03127192
001 00009659 03127192
nm eaOOg65q
001 00009663 03./~0192
OOX 00009664 03130192
001 00009665 031T0192
001 0000966~ 03F30192
O01 O00O9666 03/30192
rm nOOoq667 03/30/~
001 00009670 031301~2
001 00009671
001 00009672 0~!30192
,001 0000%T3 03/30192
001 00009674
Oq! q0~9675
001 00009676 03130192
001 00009677 03130192
~OOL,O0009ATS 03/30L92
001 00009679
00! 00009680 03130192
--.-O~! 0_0009681_ 0~130192-
001 00009682 03130/92
001 00009682 03134)!92
*T"' rmt 00009602 03L30/92
001 00009682 03130192
001 00009683 013130/92
001 00009683 03130192
001 00009683 03130192
001 00009684 0~!30192
CHECK LISTING BY FUND
Stationl 3~
WNAE
F]MAI_ TOUCH..MBJ/T
FIMAL TOUCH HARET
FII~ TOUCH HARKET
~F. Ak'UE OF CALIF.-CIT-IES
F]DAL TOUCH RARICET
FINN. TOUCH NARICET
Ft"" TOUC~ eAerrr
.......... PRONOTIONAL-PROGRAILFOR-CITy
2 FOUR COLOR 113 PG ADS IN R6
IllLAND EftPIPE IIAD AD~
REGISlIATION/4q, AIIE~NSTZTU --
PRONOTIONAL PROGR~ FOR CITY
SALES TAX FOR SERV.~AN-FEB.
PwONoTmaL-P___mDr~m_jm-cxTy
DESCRIPTION ~DONT
-!0,99.
7,195.00
4S0.00
15,309.76
IH.64
11~417,00
AIR-COM~ITIONIREFRID, IISTITUT
ALEIDMDER IilIILTII IIISTIT,IHE
ALLIED IARRICAI)E
ALLIED BARRICADE
IEADON~ DAVID A.
llCrtwl l TR~VFI CENTTo
CADET ONIFOli~
CALIFORNIAN
CPLIF, lIESOURCE IECOVERY AFJN
CARL liARPEN & CO.
CiTY OF [NUIAN HELLS
COST~ NHOLESPLE
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE-CLERK OF
DAVLIH
FRANILIN SEllgARB
SARA EFFICIENCY CERTIFICATION
GET PAGED
SUVI-FJmlCLO~F*ICEeS AHOC.
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCTS
6LEgHIES OFFICE PRODUCTS
~,GLEalES_OEF-ICE-~RODUCTS
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCTS
ATE
6TE
ATE
HANtCS ~RDMAPE
SUBSCRIP FOR CERT EOUIP DIRCT 16.00
24 ISSUES OF Igit'S LEGAL BULL 4%60
ihTTERIES-RNt-IANg|CAD~S 241
SPECIAL SIGNSIHARONAREIINSTAL 56.03
PLAN CHECK FEE REFUND
AI~IP TO SACRI~NFIITO
RUGS;CTY HALL;RNTLS;MASTE FEE 34.25
PUBI.~LGL NTC;PLAN.CONI;COUigl 31.75
ANNUAL NTItBERSUIP
DERVICES~ TELEPHONE~ DATA PRO Ta4,BB
CONFEHEKE ON 4111192 100,00
19 ~TVIVCR&OAK-STNID-FOR- CONFR-- 601,38
CHARGE/COPYING OF RESUL &/:O 4,30
AUDIO PROD,PLANNING CON~, 152,61
BINDERS;REI~ILL5
OUBSCHIPT FOR CONSONERG DIREC XO,O0
92 PORG|6-BtSi6-TCSD 137,50
· IMVESTTMG-I~UBLIC-FUN~S' .mtJB-- 3&,32
CHEDZT EHO 4~82 2,20-
CARD FILEGIFOLDERS~STAHPS 95,10
CARD FILES;FOLI)ERS;STASPB 19,40
MATS BILL .191,R2
.... MATSSERVJCE
MATS BILL 277,74
OPEN ACCOONTWHISC,PURLIC MRS 133,17
- OO~ 90009685----03/30192
001 00009685 03/30192
001 00009686 03130192
~1 nODODbB7 ,03/301_92
001 00009688 03/30192
001 00009689 03F50/92
00L--.00909690 ....03130/92-
OOl 00009691 03130192
001 00009692 03/30192
00! 0000969~ ~3/30/92
001 00009693 03/30/92
001 00009693 03/"~0/92
_nOL_O0009693 o3J3ol.92
ool 00009694 o313ol92
001 00009695 03130192
001---00009697-------03130192--
001 00009698 031~0192
001 00009699 03/~0192
~001-_00009700_ __ 03/30192 _
001 00009701 03~30~92
001 00009704
..... 001-00009705 . 031~0/92 -
001 00009706 03130192
001 00009707
001 0000970S 03130192
ICllA.ILrTIHE!tENT
ICHA PETIHEHENT
IDUPCO
NtRILYIES-COF[EE.SERVICE
RAP, RIOTT HOTEL
RCCANH PRINTING SERVICES
NCHAHaNS-;URNIZURE
HISSION VALLEY PHOLS & SPAS
HONICIPAL H6RT ASSIST. OF S.C
t!OBIL
NOBIL
I~BIL
I~BIL
PAYLEGS DRUG GTOREG
PETTY CASH
RAIF-TEC-RUBDER-SI~P-~6
RAHCHO BLUEPRINT
REGENTG OF ONIV. OF CALIF.
_RESIDENCE.INH
RIGHTNAY
S~FETYLINE
GECURIT¥.PACIFICNAT2DNAL B~
SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER
SIR SPEEDY
SO.CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE CO.
.... Normfi-Payroll
RETIPEIFJT FOg RO OF NARCH
HARDME & CADIETS;PUB.NORKS
.... ~FEEF.-SUPPLTES;Ci1:Y-DALL
CAL CITIES PLANNERS ilISTZTUTE
HONTHLY HEMSLETTER
-TV--AMD--VCH
PERHIT ISSUED IN ERROR\HEFUND
ONE YEAR gERBERSHIP
CPEDIT-CARD-CHARGES
IIOBXL CREDIT CARD
CREDIT CAR!) CHANHES
NUBIL-CREDIT CILRD
FILH PROCESSING;B&S;24EZPOSUR
CASH REIIISURSE!tENT FOR CITY
NAHEPLATES;PLANHERS
BLUEPRINTS; EtlGINEERIN6 DEPT,
ISSUES&TREND/HELLO RDOS SIRIN
-ROOH DP/INTERN'LCO SHOP CTRS-
LABOR;TRASH COHTAINER.,,REHT
REFLECTIVE STRIPS FOR VESTS
SPNS ST~T ..............
CSF FONDIMS-SR CENTER
BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATION
CELLULAR PHONE
4~.99
7,872.27
685.43
206.31
----861,99
~3~,B7
2Lt.30
611
B .81
3O2.54
4~.13
39O.0O
.124.2e
84.7~
2~.19
10,000.00
140
28&.26
Report Writer
FONI) CNECK NIGER
OO/__OOI)I)910B . 03/_30Zg2
001 00009708 03130192
081 00009714 03rlol92
ool 00009714 0313QI92
001 00009714 03130/92
~01 OOOOqT|4 031.*~lq'~
001-00009714 Q3130192
001 eOOOq/14 :'-=O3f301~2
001 O~eO~?|4 :
001 00009714 03/30192
001 00009715 03/30192
001 00009718 O31XOI92
001 00H9719 03130192
001 00009720 03r10192
001 OON~Tt] 031XOle~'
001 00009722 03130/92
i)01 00009723 03/30/92
OOl OOOOqT~5
OOl 000097~ 0:3130192
001 00009727 031;0192
OOl 00P997~ 0411419~
001 00009729 04114192
001 00009730 04114192
~Oi 00009732_
001 00009733 04/14192
001 0000979 04/11192
001 000097~ 04114t92
001 QOOODT'~ 04114192
00! 00009734 04114192
001 00009735 041HI92
001 00009736 041~4192
001 OOOQt7T'/ 04114192
001 6OOOq7:lR 04.LI.41~?
001 00009739 04114192
OO! 00009740 04114192
001 O00O~7.~O . .04/.14192
OOI 00009740 04/14192
OO! 00009740 04114192
oo~ OOOO_974~ O4.~&/~
001 00009742 041~4192
CHEC[ LISTING BY FUND
VENDOR NAliE
g),CALt. F..!)!DI~-
SI!,CALIFORfilA TELEPleDE CO,
SIXITHEll CALIF EDI~N
-~'WT;~ rat tr rutSill
SI)UT9 CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
.q. Frm:ep rm, T;
.SINTIEIIII CN. IF EDIMII
SOUTIlES Ciil;IF
ROUTHERII CALIF DISOR
SPEEDY OIL CHNI6E
TEIECULA COP1ED$ ::::: '.'/
.: TEIE131LA CDEE[
Tmmq
UNIT06 RENTAL SERVICE
NINDSOR PARTDERS-ItANCHO IND
ZEE IE1)ICAL SErflCE
N i CTTV NINAGEENT
AtetlCAN RENT-PrFEKE
BURKE, NILLIftS & SOREItSEN
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE/SUPPLIES
COaTY OF RIVERSIDE/SUPPLIER
COtNTY DE_RI~ERSI~PLIF-~
ES6IL CORPORATION
ES61L CORPORATION
.1ElaACO
RELAD & ~SOCIATES
frOORE ELECTRICAL CO!qTRACTIN6
RAftTEE
RIVEROIDE OFTICE SUPPLY
RIVER~I!~ OEICI: SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
MItt BNI ASSOCL~IT-~
NILLBAR ~SOCIATES
St~tXon:
DESCRIPTION AI,!I)UNT'
itsfiERY P;,CI~d. XIGIITOR. __ 115.2~
~ PHOIE 57A,3~'
Y'TJ.70H712 91fi-10119 "',4~,27
Y717050~2 12120-i!21 389,64
Y717050~2 3T~,74
Y7170507~ 7n~-811q 44B,5~
YTI7H0712 &!2Q 7122 485,Vl
Y7170507'~ 61H~9116 41~,1
T/IvQWTS2 10119-11120
Y717050732 11/20-12/20
REPAIR It RAINT,ClTY VEHII1ED 22,49
M*--pLAI~.q; pt-'q st
DE!WlCE;C!9IEIt;FIDE DEPT,173 75.00
TEIET ORILL .. .*. 2q,01
rqTrRtFt Or P-N, RmF'T NTG
CSF FUNDIND IO;OOLQO
UNZFORIt RENTAL DERV,PUB,NORKS
FOrlIP;ST FOR PgDI IC NORrR
1YR, RENT; STORA6E SPACE
REDICAL SUPPLIES ACCOON1 7~,72
TRAFFIC_L'OtrTe~i ;M'J40 r-d!~RO~) ....
FENCIND;DEL RIO RD,IEIqPIRE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FJ!~ DEPT SFRV~OJDI--12191
PENS;PENCILS;PUSH PINS;DHEARS
STAPLES ;TAPE; RULERS ;HIGHLITER
FOLDERS;GLUE_STIC[S;L
PIN4 CHECES 2/J-2/29/92
PLAN CHECKS FROIt 1/1-L/31192
aMILTLDR/AL.SE!W.,.T!gULaUIF 92
PLAR CHECKIND SERVICES
INSTALL,BIN POLES;CALL.E CORTZ
PtFPARAHON;CITY 6EM~N._eLAX
ROUTlIE S~.~q ~INTEMIla
EWELOPES;CALCULATORS;LADELS
FOL/)ENS4.Mm ~ ~ riCE;
CALCULATORS; PENCIL LEAD
ENVELOPES;CALCULATORS~LABELS
SB-~t pLNi CHFCSr
PLAN CHECK SERVICES FOR FEN2
2,240.00
10,156,75
177,378.38
565.M!'
71G.91
1~.119,30
1,621.68
4,7~.44
8,900.0O
t0,856.96
1&,945.SS
256.02
91.05
1,821.11
5,510.00
297.OO
001
019 00009658 0312&192
0i9 O00ODA&t o3Z30192
019 00009t~8 03130192
019 0000%69 031,30192
nit oO009&SP ~313~)192
019 O0009&S5 03130192
01~ 00009&85 03/30192
__.019._00009&93 .... 03130192
019 00009693 03130192
019 00009695 031~192'
..... O19-.-O000969&--. 03130192 --
019 0000~702 03/30192
019 00009703 031301~
...... 0~9 ..00009703 ~_ .03nO/~Z_
AROUNDABUCi
~ICDEI)IT_KCRI~,
9ILLIARD'S AND SAR STOOLS
IRANDILA, HORTENCIA
GET
ICNA RETIRERENT
ICI~A RETIRERE!fi
~OBIL ................................
figBIL
PETTY
PR~ LOCI & EEl ..........
ROI~ CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SAN
S i S ARTS AND CRAFTS
S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS
PICTURES FOR TEEN CENTER
IFJSE;FORGERSOR I'Q4-'TTOe i YR.
BILLlARD SUPPLIES
EVENT CANCEL!; (S.D. ZOO)
l? Pb'RS;i~BLS;6'TCSD
Morul Payroll
RETIRERENT FOR rio OF ~
CREDIT CAND.CHAR6ES ....
ROSIL CREDIT CARD
CASH REINDURSEIENT FOR TCSD
CYLINDER LOCr. Si~,CENTER SITE
REFUND OF PARKSISERV ASSESS
CREPE PAPER;HANgERS;GLUE
BRUSHES FOR PAINTIND. -
778,9~.25
646.02
2~.90
75.00
42,H
175,72
411,&4
1~5~,80
141,35
Report lriter
FUND CHECK NU~ISER CHECK DATE
01L._OOOO9703~D3/301~2.
019 00009708 03130192
019 00009708 0~130192
019 000~714 0I!30/92
019 00009714
019 00009714 03/30192
019 00009714 0~130192
019 00009714 0~/~01~
019 000n97!4 01/301TZ
019 00009714 03/30192
019 00009714 0~130192
019 099997i4 a3/.301~)
019 00009714
019 00009714 HI301~
oiv 000097J4 . 03/30/92
019 00009714 03/30/92
019 00009714
019 00009214 03/30/92
019 00009714
019 00009714 03/34)0/92
019 ~000~714 _031301~2
019 00009714 03/30192
019 00009714 03130192
___019--D0009~14___03130192
VENSOR NAHE
CHECK LISTING BY FUND
DESCRIPTION
Station:
_c: LS kRTS. N~_CRAFJS ................... CONSTRUCTioN PAPER;PAINT ...........
CELLULAR PHONE
CELLAR PHO~EI6.glNG 2192
- 857371164127-2/-26
208366940 2101-3103
203-S&h
208070411 2111
856806&3 2106 3106 '
85494510 1121 2110
209430094-2ALO-,VII
208'434543 01131-02129
3085171t0 2111 3/11
20816~075
5]-87957 ~130'11130191Hll 92
55'91301 6/I1-11130 & allll 92
---85=674307-01/31--02J~
208T~6957 2101'03103
30HSH19 2110 3110
]--117722-8131--111~0 &JAN92
9-685179 01/31-02/29
3113466 2110 3110
--85767812.2101-31~3--~
85689456 2106 3109
85750562 2/10 3/11
85642079-U29-2/28
203009275 1110 ~111
H105-18602 01/-02129
~0843575~,813L'J,1130191&aAN92
8735519 2111 3111
85768549 2104
87667-97-2~11-3117 --
308465420 2104
208434541
*---85764790-2110-II10--
8~793292 2110
306517678 2103-3104
SO.CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE CO.
SO,CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE
SOUT9 -CALIF-.F, DISOU.
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
OUUTm:ql Ca: 1;: FaTSat
SOUTHERN rilLiF EDISON
SDUTHEa CN, IF EDISON
'SOUTIgql CtH IF 'EOISLT
SOUTHEli CN, IF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISUN
SOUTHai CALIF EDISOll
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
g~J'~Hl:gf ~.. TF FaTSON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN-CAL~F-F.D/8ON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CAL]F EDISON
SOUTHERLCALH-EDISON
SOUTHERN CAL]F EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN-CALJF- EDISON
019 00009714 0~/30/92 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
019 00009714 03130192 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
/--_0~9 o0009714___0~130192___ '-q0UTHERII_CKIF_EDISOM
019 00009714 03130192 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
019 00009714 03130192 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
0~9 ~0809714 0:5/,30/92 SOUTHERLCail; ~nISON
019 00009714 03/30/92 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
019 00009714 03/30/92 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
___019_00009~4 -0~/50/-~2 --SOUTHERN-CALIF--EDISON
019 00009714 03/30/92 SOUTHERN CAL]F EDISON
019 00009714 03/30/92 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
397.4,
127.5,
68.4'
9
29.1:
8.71
8.71
6.2'.
51.3:
8.71
56.7.
6~ .7'
---.29.7:
8.7~
----132.3~
28.3l
9.7:
189,8~
9.6(
9.0(
9 .O(
31.1,
150,0~
8.7C
9.0(
---8.7i
9.0(
334.6~
~ 178.91
254
9.0(
_ 019_00009714._,-_03130192 ...... SOUTHEP~ c~ITLF,.DISON
019 00009714 03/30192 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
019 00009714 03/30/92 SOUTHERN CN, IF EDISON
__01~ o0009714 ..0~/~0/92 ............_-.SOUTHERM.CAL[F_EDISON
019 00009714 03150192 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
019 00009714 03/30192 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
_____019__0000~714
019 00009714 03130192
019 00009714 03130192
019._00009714 ---031:$0192
019 000097i4 03~30~92
019 00009714 03~30~92
.......... 85759053--2/05-3106-
8685178 1129-2126
308426227 210~ 3109
.................. 85--572155-011It~02129----
SOUTERIi_CALIF_FJ)ISOll
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERII-CKIF_EDISON ...............
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
208342807 2111-3/11
208360425 2103 3104
__308517215-2111-3111
65694T'/4 2106 3106
309020270 1/29-2/28
.... 8583142f-3119-3/11 .........
53-87957 01131-02129192
208446989 2110 ~/10.
.... 41.4,
262.T.
9.6(
11.0:
8.7i
8.7(
74 .T,
11.31
17.1{
I92.4;
..... 019--00009714 .... 03/30192
019 00009714 03/30192
019 00009714 05/50/92
.... 019 00009714 03/30/92
019 00009714 03/30/92
019 00009714 03/30/92
019 00009714 03/30192
019 00009714 03/30192
019 00009714 03/30192
0!9 00009714 03130192
SOUTHERN CALIF-EDISON ............................. 85817685-2101-3102
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CAL[F EDISON
SOUTHERN CAL[F EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
450771465 01131-02/29192
85-793291 01131-02129192
8797029 2~04 3105
208-4~5753 01/31-02129
85-759054 01/31-02129
308517677 2103-3104
208-446988 01131-02129192
208342907 12/1i 1111
86~5745 2111-3111192
196.7:
29
24 3!
9.3:
72.5c
9.01
32
9.3(
8.7i
Repor~ lir~ter
FUNI) CHECK IURBER C!F.C~ Mlt
____GLS__N~27J4
019 00009714
019' 00009794
0t9 000097~4
019 000097t4
0~9 00009714
Olq O000t'TiQ
01.9 00009714
019 00009714
019 0N)09714
019 00009714
019 00009714
019 00009714
N9 00009714
019 00999714
.019 00009794
0L9 000097~4
019_.0000-9-7J.4
019 00009714
019 00009716
0!9 00009724
0~9 00009730
019 00009742
a'~13o/r2
03130192
03/30192
03130/-92
03130192
03~30~92
o313opri
o3/3o!92
03/10192
03130192
o31301~
03130192
031:$0192
o3/3ol92
o31301~
o3130192
o3/1,ol92
~3~0/-92
03130192
04114192
04lS41~2
04114192
CHECK LISTIN6 BY FUIID
Station: 33~
SOUTEll CKIF EDISIBI
SliTEll re. IF DI~I
SDUTF'..ql CALIF DIH::
SOU'!~R~ ~ALIF DISON
SOUTHEItll CN..IF EDISON
SOIJTlel CAt. IF
~ CN.IF DISON
SINTICIN-CN.IF--EDISg::
SOUTIERtl CALIF DISON
SOtrrHEitli CKIF E)ISOl
SSUTw~ Cm F FnlS011
SOU11BII CKIF EDISON
SDUTIBR CKIF DISAN
SOIlTIdal CN TF FI)ISOM
SOUTHERN CALIF DISOIl
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISOli
SDUTERIL~LIF EDISON.-
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
STEEBER, XAREN
STIGN.L.,-GRE6ORY
VIARS, CARRIE
BURKE, MILLING Ic SOltENSEd
-- CaltANA .C{.AY-COt',PANY
MILLDAN ASSOCIATES
DESCRIPTIOII ARDUNT
_~)8-_4~4540--01/-31--02129192 ...............31.84
8814825 1127-2126 257.04
308404531 1/31-3103 "" 9.68
'3,q433761-2/O$-3109
20B-436569 01/31-02129 31.90
308476369 21L1 3111 5,78
85-767609 01/31-02/29 32,35
02101-02129192 13~1,76
POBO10H342 2161-31H 2&2.55
PO82&O02914~lOt4103 59e,78
02101-02/29192 3,~20
Ii105-18569 OU~L-02129/92 97.,21
208404529 2tO& 310&
53100917 2110 3111 9,82
85-767810 01131"02129192 30.89
8-364803 9/I4)--tt/.30/99&FD-92
11701262B 01129--02/28192 70.16
B~747396 01131-02/29192 21,87
_ 70802~1~-.2106.-3/0& .40,45
53-91301 01131-02129192 15,29
IF. FUND-OUILTIN6 CLASS 51).00
RF~ND-F. OB,-.6OLF--CL.ASS
REFUND FOR ZOO TRIP 1;,00
PROFESSiOMAL SERVICES 812,74
~DIJIID/I!| -T~O -1:14~,46
PREPARE REPORTS{LE6AL DESCRIP 2,254.00
ot9
021 OOOO9741 04114192
ROBERT BEIN, Ill(. FROST & ASSO
EITENTIIN OF C,0,t0210-'0294
3,100.00
029 00009656 03126192 RAMCHO OVERHEAD DOORS ROLLIII6 D~ORS;COMCESSION{TCSS 85).00
3zs,21.e.e7
Fiscal Year: 1992 Check Register
Check Date Vendor Hate
Invoice Date PIO Date
Description
Gross
Discount
Net
_00009743 0315119: SO CAL-2 SO,CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE CO,
00~55 05111192
03111192 BATTERY PACK & ELIHINATOR
115,29 0,00 115,29
462.&&- 0,00 ...... 462,66
113,73 0,00 11S,73
95,71 0.00 95.71
127.54----0-00-- 127,54---
142,72 O,OO 142,72
47.83 ' O.O0 47,83
.. 88,49 -0,00 .... 88.49-
.... 7143456005jl,~J07~92-
7145495457 03107192
7145493438 03107192
7143457422 031071f2
7142924020-05/0Z/32---
03106192-CEU. ULNUO2192 ........
03107192 CELLULAR 02192
03107192 CELLULAR \ 02~92
05107!92..CELLUL~-- ~
03107192 CELLULAR 02191
031071~ CELLULAR 02192
01107-/-92-CELLOLAR 02192
Check Totals:
OOOOB.7.4~.03/~IZBZ,SO_CAL:2-SO-CAL/F~R!IIA~ELEPHONE-CO,
7145457425 05107192 03107192 CELLULAR 02192
1,193,97 O,OO 1~193,97
66.10 0,00 66,10
r, heck_~otals: .................... &&,lO ..............
0000974~ 04102192 STADIUNP STADIUN PIZZA
033192 03/51/92 05/31R2 FOOD FOR STAFF HORNSHOP TRAIN 80,00 0,00
Check Totals: 80,00 0.00
00009748 04/05/92 ALLIED ALLIED BARRICADE
........... 121659-00 03124192.0368 .... 03104/92 .CIP SI6NS; ............ 829.&8 ....... 0.00 --
66,10 ......
60.00
80.00
829.68 *
Check Totals:
.... 0000974~ 04105192 DICKHELL DICKNELL TRAVEL CENTER ..............
032492 03124192 03124192 AIR TICKETS/GFBA ANNUAL CONF
829,68 0,00 829,68
358,00 0.00 558,00
_--- ............................................... Check Totals:
358.00 ........ 0.00 .......
00009750 04105/92 BZSHOPCD BISHOP CO,
47322 0511&192 11560 02/19/92 BRAPPER;PUBLIC HORNS DEPT,
Check Totals=
00009751 04/03/92 CALIFLAN CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
........ 508520225 .*-02/29192 11510__.02119192-INSTALL;SPRINKLERS;SPORTS. PRK-*-
308520228 02129192 11312 02119192 REPLACE PINE TREES.~HOODCREST
308520229 02129192 11309 02119192 GRADE & OVERSEED~SAN HICKS
Check Totals= 466,50
00009752 04105/92 CALIFORN CALIFORNIAN
............. 00543 -.03123192 10941 ---10102/91LE6AL tlOTICES'.,-CITY*CLERK .......... 12,00
02195 03/16/92 10941 10102/91LE6AL NOTICES; CITY CLERK 108,42
00044-4416 03105192 10941 10102191 LEGAL NDTICESI CITY CLERK 35,25
0044-4A16-05/05192 10958-- IO/02191--LEGAL NOTICES;-PLANNINGDEP-L 54,98 .....
0647-0075 05/05/92 10626 02101192 PUDL~LGL NTC~PLAN,C~NICOUNCL 61,95
62,72
62,72
..... 275.50 ....
150.00
65,00
358.00 ......
0.00 62.72
0,00 62,72
0,00 ...... 275,50 --
0.00 130,00
0,00 65,00
0.00 4~.50
0,00 ....... 12.00- -
0.00 108.42
0.00 35.2~
*--0,00 54.98-
0.00 61,95
00009755 04/05t92 C~LINS CAL-SURAHCE ASSOCIATES~ INC
1058002 0~/23192 03125192 EQUIPMENT FLOATER
Check Totals:
0000~754 04103/92 CB~ CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFFICIALS
~5~192 0~1~192 03/51/92 NE~IBERSHIP 92-95
. _Check_Totals: ......................... 272,59 0,00. 272,58
500,00 0,00 500,00
500.00 0.00 ~OO.O0
115,00 0.00 115,00
Check Totals:
00009755 04!03i~2 gITICORP CITICOR? NORTH A~ERICA
01286~? 03t20192 0255 07101/91SERV,CHARGE:PHONE SYSTEH
!15.00 0,00 1!5.00
1,427,57 0,00 1J27,57
Check Totals:
1~427,57 0.00 1,427,57
Fiscal Year: 1992 Check Register Station: 3~b~
Check Date Vendor Nase
Invoice Date PIO Date
00009756 04/03/92 COUNTYTR COUIrTY OF R3VERSXDE
129256 02/01/92 02101/92
170909__ 02125/r2 07/25192
120559 01128/92 0~128192
110504 01101192 01101192
DescrYprim
6191-1549CR~15'UIHC~Ill~ ON R
!I,92,,IWT/iPTTA KEDON_SH~-CT!t
12191-YNEZiHAR6ARITA SHOP CTR
9191-151RCR,151111NCH~UlNCH OH
6ross D~scount Net
, ,. .......... :.~-. :- , _, ,
322.~ Q.O0 322
I1.N O.OO 128.U4--~
63.44 O.OO 6~.44
176.56- 0.00 176.58-
00009757 04103192 DATAPRIM D~TA PRINT
197e4~ nx/11/~ 11-'3/,s
Check Totals:
KAR[Fi~ICURVR imIQIRIR-'"INS
:337.23 O,O0 337
70,54 Q.O0 20.54-,*
OOO0975B 04103192 DAVLIN DAVLTN
89-23:164 0:$/70/92 10942
89-23:168 HI25192 11341
f~-?X~I69 OXI?51~ 11797
Check Totals: 20,54 O,O0 20,54
09127191 3 ~ONTHIAU9IO TAPIII6;PLqlill} 45.38 O.O0 45.38
02/25/92 AUDIO/VIDE03/24/92 614.82 0.00 614.82
o?/11/9~ T~ 317582 I;[TTIIG ITA,2o Q,OO _134,20,
__ODOO975LO4.LO3192..6T. EBiLL*-**GTE
694-1999H 0~128192
Check TotaIs: 794,40 0,00 794,40
03/28/92 714-694-1989/NtR BILLINS 2~155,18 0,00 2J55,18
00009760 04/0~/92 I~iA ICHA
040292 04102192
00009761 04103192 IES-APA IES - APA
_0~2792.- ..... 03/27192--
....... Check_Total s: __ 2., 155, 18 O, O0 .......2,155.18 .- -
04/02/92 CONFEREHCE/4/22-4/24/DD~KL 520,00 0,00 520,00
check tot, l. ........... ............. .........
03127192JtEGIST,-i. OR. NEO _TRAD. S~IILAR ........._925,00 ~-- .Q,O0 .l.2~ ~ ......
Check Totals:
O0009.7.&2_O.&/03/9~ IHTERNAT_JILTERHATL_CONE,--DE-BLDG-.-OEFL .......
032692 03126192 03126192 HEliBERSHIP N~ SUBSCRIPTION
C1776~ 03120192 ~567 05102192 PDSTERSI BUILDING & SAFETY
Check Totals:
0000976~ 04/03/92 LOCAL L0CAL 60VERIffiENT CONHISSION
..... H0~92 0410~192 ........ 041_03/92_RECYCLINS..PtlKICA~ONS ...........
125.00
246.75
48.71
295.46
__27.50
O,O0 125,00
0,00 246.75
0.00 48.71
O.O0 295.46
0,00_ 27.50-
Check'TOtals:
OOOOeZ764_OHD$I92, pARADIS[,pARADZSLCHEVROLET_ .....
033092 0~1~0192 03130192 LICENSE PLATES FOR CN 8LAZER
27,50 0,00 27,50
395.00 0.00 395.00
check_Totals: ....... 395,00--
00009765 04103192 PERSET! PERS E!iPLOYEES' RETIRERENT
2PERR,73 03126192 0~!26192 Normal PIN 3126192 253,17
040192 __0410U92 ...... 0410~B2.P~T._EOILPERS_RETIRE-317:~I20 ......12~769,63
0.00 395,00
O,O0 253.17
0.00 ___12,769.~ .....
O0009366_04103/_92_RAh~HOBL-RANCHO-BLUEPRIIfi ....
40708 03/23192 11416
Check htals: 13~022.80
0~/18/92 HAP REDUCTIONS;CITY CLERES 84.85
0.00 13,022.80
0.00 94.85
Check Totals:-
00009767 0410~/92 RANPAC RANPAC ENGINEERING
040~92 04/08/92 04/0~192 HAP AND LEGAL DISCRIPTION
Check Totals:
O0009748 04103/92 RIVERSID RIVERS[DE OFFICE SUPPLY
............ 101007 02/01!92 10949 10/10/91HCR PAPER? CASH RECEIPTS
84.85 O.O0 84.85
4,$50.00 0.00
4,~50.00 0.00 4~350,00
429,28 O,O0 42%28
Fiscal Year: 1992 Check Register Station: 3G69
Check Date
Vendor Nile
Invoice Dike PIO Date Description
_N)OO93~9-OalO31f2-RIJ~ROBE -RUMOr RO_Ir-RT
0~3192 03131192
Check Totals|
031311r2 REFUE ON LIGHTS-RA]NDUT
Discount
Net
42~.28 0,00
15,00 0,00
429,28
15,00
Check Totalst
00009770 04101192 SCHtNACH ~tlACHER AUTO SALE I LEASIN
0:33092 03/30R2 11175 12115191FLAllD TRUCE;CITY !f. PTS,
15.00 0.00
21,317.78 0.00
I5.00
21,317.78
Ci~ck Totals:
00009771 04105192 SO CAL-2 SO,CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE CO.
7t4545747t 031071q2 01107192 CELLIUII, R n?/v2
21,317.78 O.O0
189.69 O.O0
21,517.78'
189.69
Check Totals:
O000g. ZZ2.-04103192 SOU1'H~ -_qQLEHEa-CAL!FE~ZSON
567559900 02/28192 02128192 34)8-3432751215-2110192
665848061 0~/26192 03126192 Y717050633 02121'-03120192
--66584807L0312~1-92 03126/92-Y3J,.7039.9,L?--O2121-J)~201-92
665848057 03126192 03~26~92 Y717-044950 02/21-03120192
/~5848065 03126192 03~26~92 Y717050733 02121-03120192
199.69 O.OO 189.69
1.50 0,00
426.41 0.00
101.91 ~.00--
815.29 O.O0
;$08,64 0.00
1.50
426,41
101,91 ....
815.29
308.64
.665848067_03/26192__
538152104 03112192
665848069 03/2~/92
665848085--03126192.
665845056 0:/26/92
665848065 03/26/92
Check Totals:
00009775 0410~/92 STUARTFR FRANKLIN C. A. STUART
.0~2992___03129192_0346 .... D~/15/92_ASDEESS_NU~ERINB;CITY
031261.~/,_1~705~989_02/2J,=03120192 .......... 442.73 .......... 0.00
01/12192 POD010008542 02101-05130192 329.D4 0.00
03/26192 ~67010011 02121-03120192 417.80 0.00
~i26192-~1705071~2-02121,03120192 .............. 469.~7 ..............0.00
03126192 Y717017614 02121-03120192 693,66 0.00
03126/92 Y717050830 02121-03120192 65,03 O,OO
4,071.28 0.00
..... 442.7I--
328.84
417.80
469,47
693.66
65.03
4,071.28
320.00 ..... O.O0 320.00.
O000917LOIIO~/~2_TARGE~_.-TARGET-STORE ....
035192 03131192
Check Totals: 520,00 0.00
03/31192 SUPPLY FOR EASTER CRAR 50,00 0,00
320.00
50.00
........................ Check.~otaZs: ....
00009775 04/03/92 TEEPLAY TEHECULA VALLEY PLAYHOUSE
040592 04103192 04105192 csf funding
Check Totals:
00009776 04/03/92 TENffiJSEU TEECULA RUSEU~ FOUNDAT]ON
50,00_
10~000,00
lO~OOO,O0
_ N0192___04].01192 H/Ol/-92-LIF_~UND]NG .APPRDVG_2125192 20,000,00
-0,00 ......... 50.00 ....
O.O0 lO,OOO.O0
O.OO 10,000.00
O.O0 20,000.00.
Check Totals:
._O0009777_04/03/.t2_TBVLYHS T~ECULA.VLY_HS_BRAD_NI]E_CON
040392 04101192 04/03/92 csf funding
20,000.00
5,000,00
0.00 20,000.00
0,00 5,000,00
00009778 04~05~92 TOYOTA TOYOTA OF TE~ECULA
040392 04~02~92 04102192 ACQUIRE STORH DRAIN
Check Totals:
00009779 04/03/92 TUHBLEOU TUHDLE OUNGLE
........... 0S3192 03/~1/92
03~192A 03/;S1/92
ChecLTotals: ........................ 5,000.00
32,000.00
52,000.00
G~I~1/92 BOZ KINDER TUNaLERS 7D0,80
03/31/92 80~ TINY TUNBLERS 564.80
-0.00 --- 5,00O,OO--.
0.00 32:000,00
0,00 32:000.00
O.OO 7RO,BO
0.00 364.80
Check Totals: 1J45.60
O,OO 1,145.60
v4/V3,,~2
Fiscal Year: 1992
Check Register
Check Date Vendor Naee
Invoice Date PIO Date Description
00009780 04103192 UHIGLOBE UNIGLDBE BUTTERFIELD TRAVEL
040192 04101192 04101/92 COWFERENCEI4122-241DDJJ..
6ross
65&.OO
00009781 04114/92 ALLCITY
Check Totals:
ALL CITY RMAGEllENT
O~f?ll~ ~ 10106191TNFFTt
656.00
, "Check Totals:
00009782 0411U92 LTXTRN. C L'EM1TAL,C~IES-S~ICE
4202 0~11&192 11335 02/25192 ROAD SNTrY SIN; PUB. MORI(S
9,318,76
04114192 6t. ENNIES BIB OFFICE PRODUCTS
F)OII-O 031201. 11393 03116192
99980-0 03/Z9/*.22~.~96 03/L6/92
Check Totals:
CIIAXIiS.,F-.XLF.-CAa/IIET.*;ZEEX-.CTR
9,T19.76
1,002. OB
2F~.49
Check Totals:
1,301.57
Report TotaZs:
13b,772.60
Discount
.
0.00
O.O0
0.00
0.00
0.00
O.O0
0.00
0.00
0.00
Station:
Net
6~.00
3~455,5&
:3,455.5&
9,318.7&
9,118..76-----
1,002.06
299*,49 .
17:301.57
l~&,772.&O
Re~ort Nriter C~CK LISTING BY FUN/) Stirion=
FUND CHECK NLNHER CHECK DATE VENDOR NAHE
DESCRIPTION Affi)lJNl
001 00009743 0313LI92
001 00009743 03131192
~! q0009743 03/311~
001 00009743 05131192
001 00009745 05131192
001 00009749 04105192
001 O00ff7'dO 04105R2
OOl 00009752
001 00009752 04103192
001 00009752 04105192
out 0000975? aalOxl~
001 000097U 04105R2
001 00009754 04103192
o0~ oo91)9.7.55..
q01 0000~756 04103192
001 00009756 04103192
out OOO. O97_Sk
001 00009756 04103192
001 0000V757
o00.0934~___0,~J.~1/-.92 ...... ~-.__ S0,CALtFOP, NIk-TRLEPHONE-*CQ,--
SO.CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE CO,
SO,CALIFORNIA TELEPHI)NE CO,
SO,CALXl;OIIIILTELEPHOHE--!:O,
SO,CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE CO,
SO,CALIFORNIA TELEPIIONE CO,
"it I~O BAIIRICAOE
I]CKIIELL TRAVEL CENTER
CP IFURffiM'.
CALIFORNIAN
CALIFORNIAN
('N TFOIttIINd
CALIFORNIA BUILDIN6 OFFICIALS
C|T1roRP NORTH AKERTCA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
_COUNT]LOF_EIVF. RS~DE
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
DATA PRINT
CELLULAIL02/91 142,72
CELLULAR \ 02/92 95,71
CELLULAR 02192
CELLULANI021.t2 ....... 462.66
BATTERY PACK & ELIMINATOR 1f5,29
CELLULAR 02192 A6.10
CIP SISMS~ 829,&8
AIR TICI(ETS!6FOA ANNUAL CONF 558,00
6RAPPERIPUULIC IIQItI~S DEPT, ~2,72
LEGAI. JIg~CES; r_!TT P_~RK 108,42
PUBL~L6L NTC;PLAN,CD~H;COUNCL 61.95
LEGAL NOTICES; CITY CLERK 47,23
i FOAL NOTJCES;-PL4NNLu6 ~EPT,
EOUIPHENT FLOATER 500.00
NEHHERSHIP 92-~:3 115,00
SERV.CIIARSE; PI!IXIE -SYSTEH * 1 ~ 427.57
9/91-15/RCR~lS/NIKCN~M[NCN ON 176,50.
8/91-15-RCRJS-MINC~MINC ON R
............ 1/92-NAR6ANITA-NEDON-SHOP CTR ............ 128.04
12191-YNEZINANGARITA SNDP CTR 63.44
HAPJ~ERS;CURVED ANROKS;PLANIN6 20.54
.00L00009.7-59. .
00l 00009758
001 00009758
00~ a00OD.7J9
001 00009760
001 00009761
ool 000097&?
00~ 00009762
00t 00009763
00L~,00~764
001 00009765
001 00009765
oOt 00009765
001 00009766
001 00009767
00L_000097.~R
001 00009770
001 00009771
04103192
04~03~92
._.0410~97
04103192
04103192
041_03192
04/03/92
04/03192
0U03192_ DAVLIN
04/03/92 DAVLIN
04/03192 GAVLIN
04103/92 .........
ICHA
IES - APA
BTL_COIE-...OF_IIL!)6.-OF-FL
INTERNATL CONF. OF BLD6. OFFL
LOCAL 60 VERNMENT CONMISSION
PARADISE_CHEV.RI!/I~T
PERS ERPLOYEES' RET]REt, F..NT
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT
04/.03192 ......... PENS -ENPLOYEES:JtET ]RENENT
04103/92 RANCHO BLUEPRINT
041051r2 RANPAC ENGIEERIN6
._.041.03/~ RIVEILSLDLOF,c.[CLSOPPLY ----
04103192 SCHUt~ACHER ~UTD SALE & LEASIN
04/0:3/92 SO,CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE CO.
00,1.--00009732 ....0410M92 .........
001 00009772 04103192
00! 00009772 0410M92
0af n0009772 04/03192
001 00009772 04103192
00! 00009772 0410M92
0(LL._000_0~77P _041031~2__
001 00009772 0410M92
00~ 00009772 04103192
----0O! ~009.7-71-.~ 04101192.
001 00009775 04103192
001 00009776 0410M92
..... 001--00009777. 04/0M92
OOl 00009780 04/03192
" O01 00009791 04/14/92
001 00009782 04/14/92
SOUTRERN-CALI[ EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTNERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERn_. CALtF-FJ)ISOU
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
.SOUTERIL£ALIEBISOIi
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
FRANKLIR*C.-.A. -STUART*
TEHECULA VALLEY PLAYHOUSE
TENECULA MUSEUM FOUNDATION
TEHECULA VLY HS 6RAD KITE COlt
UNIGLOBE BUTTERFIELD TRAVEL
ALL CITY ~NAGEHENT
CENTRAL CITIES SI6N SERVICE
AUDIOIVlBEO-3124192 614.82
TAPE 3125192 HEETIN6 134,20
3 NORTH;AUDIO TAPING;PLANNING 45,36
214-694-198911~AR,-BILLIN6-- 2,1H,18
COUFERENCE!4122-41241DD~ 520,00
RESIST, FOR NEO TRAD SEMINAR ~25.00
~]P-ANI) P_t~r_RIP_TION 246,75
POSTERS; BUILDING & RAF[TY 48,71
RECYCLING PU~LICATIOUS 27,50
~ICENSE_PL~ F_oR CR mMFR
~ FOR PERS RETIRE 5/7-5/20 4~188,26
Moral P/R 3/2&/92 253J7
PNT-FOR-PERS-RET3RE-3/7--3/20 6~024,51
DAP REDUCTIONS;CITY CLERKS 14,85
MAP AKi) LESAL DISCRIPTIOU
..NCH-PAPFd;-CASH-RECEIP-TS 429,28
FLATBED TRUCK;CITY DEPTS, 21J~7,79
CELLULAR 02/92
-Y3~TOlOO~LO2/2L-O,M20/92 --4~7,80
Y'/L705Q830 02/2~-03/20/92 &5,03
Y'/170507:33 02/2~-05/20/~2 X8,64
Y717053989-~2/21--03/20/-~2 -- 442,7~
YTJTQS08~ 02/21-03/20/92 426,42
Y717039917 02121-03120/92 101,91
3717Q17~I4J)2Z2L~051201.92__ 693.64
Y717~5078~2 02121-03120192 469,47
Y717-044950 02121-0~20192 8~5,2~
--ADORESS-NI~OF. RIK6;CITY 320,0~
csf fundjq 10~010,00
CSF FUNDING APPROVED 2/25/92
csf fundinQ .....
CONFERENCEI4122-241DDJL
TRAFFIC CONTROLI31B-M21 3,4S5,5:
ROAD SAFETY SIGNS; PUB, MONKS
98,608.7(
Report Nriter CHECK LISTING 9Y FUND Stationt ~S
FUND CHECK NU!'!RER CHECK M1T VENDOR NAIIE DESCRIPTION AHOUNT
OlA 0090.9~2L 04JO~q? TOYOTA n; Tt:,FCI~_A ......... KOUIRLSTOi~.N~AIN ...... 32,000.0~
019 00009743 03131192 SO.CALIFDRNIA TE~ CO. CELLLL4R 02192
01q (X~_0974:5 031:51L92 ~..~&IFORNIA_TELEp~nm: f~. FEILUU~-LO2L92
019 00009746 04102/92 STADIIM PIZZA FQOD FOR STAFF NOR[SHOP TRAIN 80.00
019 00009751 04105192 CALIFORNIA LNIDSCAPE GRADE & OVERSEED:SAN HICKS
at~ 0N~4751 MIA31r~ PN lFOlafl~ I PuHf~A''' IN~TA; I ~,~PRTM~ i:9~;QPOOTS p~
019 QOQff751 H1431~2 CN. IFORIIIA LAIdCAPE REPLACE PINE TREES;NOODCREST
019 OOO09765 H!03/f12 PERS EIIPLOYE~' RETIREItENT I~T FOB PERS RETIRE ~/7-3/2Q 2~556.6b
OIq aOOO97&~ MlnTle/2 RUin, BfiwERT WlID_fI-LIBNTS--IIAINDUT 15.0G
0~9 00009772 04/03r92 SOUTHaN CN. IF EDISON 308-343275/2/5'-2/10/92 ~..~
0~9 OO0O9772 04t03/92 SOUTHERN C~IF EDISON POO010008342 02/01-03/30/~ 3~B.84
019 ~009774 0410519'2 TAReFT GTOm: RIPPlY FN EOqTEn CPJkFT ~Q.QC
019 00009779 04/03/92 TUIBLE aUNGLE 901 TINY TUIIN~RS 3b4.BC
019 04X)04779 04/03/F2 TUKF. E aUNGLE 80~ KINDEN TUIIBLERS 7BO.GC
019 GOQO~Tg3 041~419~ I~IMIIE~ OFTICF PROhUCTS 9r~t~; TErN IX:MTBt
.0~9 0000978~ 04/~4/92 GLENflIES OFFICE PRODUCTS CHAXRS;FILE CASIIET;TF. FJ4 CTR 2~9.4¶
ITEM NO.
4
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
APPROV/~L
ITY ATTORNEY7~ ~~
Mary Jane Henry, Finance Officer
April 14, 1992
City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 1992
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's
report as of January 31, 1992.
DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment
portfolio and receipts,. disbursements and fund balance are required by Government
Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in
compliance with the Code Sections as of January 31, 1992.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENT:
City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 1992
City of Ternecula
City Treasurer's Report
As of January 31, 1992
Cash Activity for the Month of January:
Cash and Investments as of January 1, 1992
Cash Receipts
Cash Disbursements
Cash and Investments as of January 31, 1992
$
$
13,034,395
5,852,329
(1,903,578)
16,983,146
Cash and Investments Portfolio as of January 31, 1992:
Type of Investment
Demand Deposits
Treasury Service Shares
Petty Cash
Certificate of Deposit
Deferred Comp. Fund
Local Agency Investment Fund
Security Pacific
Pacific Horizons
N/A
Overland Bank
ICMA
State Treasurer
Cash and Investments as of January 31, 1992
Yield
N/A
4.570%
N/A
N/A
6.523%
Matudty
Date
N/A
N/A
N/A
02/21/92
N/A
N/A
Balance
asof
January 31, 1992
(615,638) (1)
796,493
800
100,000
73,766
16,627,725
16,983,146
(1)-This amount includes outstanding checks.
Per Government Code Requirements, this Treasurer's Report is in compliance with
the City of Temecula's Investment Policy and there are adequate funds available
to meet budgeted and actual expenditures for the next thirty days of the City
of Temecula.
Prepared by Carole Serfling, Senior Accountant
m~ O ~
ITEM NO.
5
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVj~T.
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane Henry, Finance Officer
April 14, 1992
City Treasurer's Report as of February 29, 1992
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's
report as of February 29, 1992.
DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment
portfolio and receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government
Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in
compliance with the Code Sections as of February 29, 1992.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENT:
City Treasurer's Report as of February 29, 1992
City of Temecula
City Treasurer's Report
As of February 29, 1992
Cash Activity for the Month of February:
Cash and Investments as of February 1, 1992
Cash Receipts
Cash Disbursements
Cash and Investments as of February 29, 1992
$
$
16,983,146
1,007,941
(2,242,542)
15,746,545
Cash and Investments Portfolio as of February 29, 1992:
Type of Investment
Institution
Demand Deposits
Treasury Service Shares
Petty Cash
Deferred Comp. Fund
Local Agency Investment Fund
Security Pacific
Pacific Horizons
N/A
ICMA
State Treasurer
Cash and Investments as of February 29, 1992
Yield
N/A
4.570%
NIA
N/A
6.623%
Matudty
Date
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Balance
asof
February 29, 1992
(545,623) (1)
506,877
800
73,766
15,71 2,725
$ 15,746,545
(1)-This amount includes outstanding checks.
Per Gnvemment Code Requirements, this Treasurer's Report is in compliance with
the City of Temecula's Inveai~i lem Policy and there are adequate funds available
to meet budgeted and actual expenditure for the next thirty days of the City
of Temecula.
Prepared by Carde Ser~ing, Senior Accountant
ITEM 6
APPROVAT.
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Department of Public Works
April 14, 1992
Award of Contract for the Construction of Traffic Signals, Ramp
Widening, Median Modifications, Lane Reconfiguration, and Landscaping
Improvements at the I-15/Rancho California Road Interchange (Project
No. PW91-04)
PREPARED BY:
Douglas M. Stewart, Deputy City Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Award a contract for construction of traffic signals, ramp widening, median
modifications, lane reconfiguration, and landscaping improvements at the I-15/Rancho
California Road Interchange (Project No. PW91-04) to Oliver Brothers for
$526,681.36, and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said contract.
Approve an advance of $579,350.00 (bid amount plus 10% to allow for possible
change orders) from the Development Impact Fee Fund to the Capital Projects Fund
and appropriate $579,350.00 to Capital Projects Account No. 021-165-622-44-5804
from Unreserved Fund Balance.
BACKGROUND:
On December 17, 1992, the City Council authorized the Public Works Department to advertise
the Notice Inviting Bids for the construction of traffic signals, ramp widening, median
modifications, lane reconfiguration, and landscaping improvements at the 1-15/Rancho
California Road Interchange.
Improvements to be constructed with this project include:
1. Widening the northbound and southbound off-ramps;
-1-
pwO1%agdrpt~92%O414%pw91-O4.oon 040892
2. Installing traffic signals at the on and off-ramp intersections;
3. Re-paving and re-striping the approach ramps to the bridge on Rancho California Road;
Median modifications on Rancho California Road to provide for increased turning lanes
at Ynez and Front Street;
Widening and installation of a free right turn lane from Rancho California Road to
southbound Ynez Road;
Modification of the traffic signals at Front Street and Ynez Road to accommodate
connection with the newly installed signals on the bridge; and
7. Landscaping of the shoulders and medians within the project limits.
Bids or this project were publicly opened and read on February 20, 1992, at 2:00 pm. The
bids received were as follows:
1. Oliver Brothers (apparent low bidder)
$526,681.36
2. Matich Corporation
~587,129.50
3. Riverside Construction Company
~598,151.81
4. Hillcrest Contracting, Incorporated $630,135.97
5. Excel Paving Company $638,082.15
6. E.L. Yeager Construction
$646,641.50
7. Vance Corporation
~777,425.01
The Engineer's Estimate for this project is $607,114.20. Oliver Brothers' bid of $526,681.36
is $80,432.84 below the Engineer's Estimate.
The difference
$253,721.62.
$74,070.45.
between the low bidder and high bidder (total of seven bids) was
It should be noted that the difference between the three lowest bidders was
Oliver Brothers was awarded the contract for the Rancho California Benefit District (Project ·
No. PW91-03) and thus will be able to use that excess dirt material to complete the slope fills
on the I-15/Rancho California Road signalization project. The close proximity of these two
projects enables Oliver Brothers to use equipment and manpower on both projects, giving
them the edge to achieve the lowest bid on this project.
A pre-construction meeting will be held for the project on April 16, 1992 at which time the
Notice to Proceed will be issued to Oliver Brothers. The contractor has (per Caltrans
specification) fifteen (15) days to begin work on the project after receipt of the Notice to
Proceed, therefore Staff expects work to begin on or before April 30, 1992 with a 90-working
-2- pwO1~mgdrpt%92%D414%pw91-O4.oon 040892
day (approximately 4-1/2 months) completio~ time frame (completion expected on or before
September 7, 1992).
DISCUSSION:
Staff recommendation is to award the contract to Oliver Brothers Construction for the total
sum of $526,681.36 with a completion time of 90 working days. Liquidated damages for this
contract are One Thousand Dollars (~ 1,000,00) per calendar day beyond the completion date
of the contract.
Staff has received verbal approval (letter of approval to follow) from Ernie Rogers, Local
Streets and Roads Engineer for Caltrans to award the contract for the project. Their approval
is necessary in order to receive $287,000.00 in Federal Aid Interstate (FAI) funds allocated
to this project. These funds will be administered through the Caltrans Local Assistance
Program.
FISCAL IMPACT:
On November 12, 1991, the City Council approved an agreement with the developers of the
Margarita Village Specific Plan (Bedford Properties, Marlborough Development Corporation,
Margarita Village Development Company, and TAYCO) to reimburse the City of Temecula for
construction of certain improvements to the I-15/Rancho California Road Interchange, The
costs incurred by the City of Temecula for surveying, soils, inspection, and construction of
the project shall be reimbursed to the City through the approved agreement at the building
permit stage.
It is necessary to advance ~579,350.00 from the Development Impact Fee Fund to the Capital
Projects Fund and appropriate $579,350.00 to Account No. 021-165-622-44-5804 from
Unreserved Fund Balance.
-3-
pwOllagdrpt~92%O414~pw91-O4.oon 040892
ITEM
7
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
City Attorney
April 14, 1992
Margarita Road Assessment District Reimbursement of City Start-up
Costs
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DECLARING CERTAIN FINDINGS REGARDING CITY
EXPENDITURES IN CONNECTION WITH ESTABLISHMENT OF
MARGARITA ROAD ASSESSMENTS AS REQUIRED BY UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY REGULATIONS
(SECTION 1.103-18)
BACKGROUND: Cities typically make expenditures in anticipation of issuance of
tax exempt bonds, with the intent that the City will be reimbursed from bond proceeds.
Recent United States Department of the Treasury regulations now require that cities adopt a
Resolution of Intention stating their intent to reimburse their expenditures from the issuance
of tax-exempt bond proceeds.
The Council previously authorized the hiring of Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates to
design the extension of Margarita Road. Staff is presently exploring with the Bedford
Company, the establishment of a financing district to pay for these improvements. In the
meantime, it is necessary to adopt a resolution indicating the City's intention to recover from
bond sales any City expenditures. Enclosed is such a resolution in connection with the
establishment of an assessment district to build Margarita Road from Winchester to South
General Kearney Road.
FISCAL IMPACT: This will insure the recovery from the proceeds of any bonds sold
to finance the extension of Margarita Road.
SFF:jsg
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A ~LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCrL OF ~
CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING CERTAIN
FINDINGS REGARDING C1TY EXPENDITURF~ IN
CONNEC~ON Wn'H THE EXTENSION OF
MARGARITA ROAD FROM WINCHES'rER TO
SOIYrH GENERAL KEARNEY ROAD AS REQUIRED
BY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE
TREASURY REGULATIONS (SECTION 1.103-18)
WH~tE&S, on January 27, 1992, the United States Department of the Treasury (the
"Treasury*) issued final regulations (Section 1. 103-18) relating to the use of bond proceeds for
the reimbursement of expenditures made prior to the date of issuance of bonds (the
'Reimbursement Regulations*); and
WHEREAS, under the Reimbursement Regulations, in general, if specified requirements
are satisfied, the proceeds used for reimbursement are deemed to be spent on the date of
reimbursement; and
WHEREAS,if such requirements are not satisfied, thea proceeds used for reimbursement
will remain subject to the rebate, arbitrage and other rules relating to tax-exemption until
ultimately spent; and
WIIEREAS, the Reimbursement Regulations apply to tax-exempt obligations issued after
March 2, 1992, except that the Reimbursement Regulations do not apply to expenditures before
such date if such expenditures were made after September 8, 1989, and if there was objective
evidence at the time of the expenditures that the issuer reasonably expected to reimburse the
expenditure with bond proceeds; and "
WilltEAS, on November 12, 1991~ by its minute action authorizing execution of a civil
engineering consulling agreement, the City of Temecula (*City*) declared its intention to
reimburse certain expenditures it would make for the extension of Margarita Raod from
Winchester Road to South General Keamey (the *Project) with the proceeds of tax exempt
obligations (*Obligations*). City has to date made expenditures approximating $70,000 and
intends to make further expenditures relating to the Project in anticipation of issuance of the
Obligations collectively referred to as the ("Expenditure*); and
~, in order to comply with the Reimbursement Regulations, the public interest
and convenience require that City officially declare its intent that City reasonably expects to
reimburse the Expenditure with proceeds of the Obligations;
NOW TIIEREFORE, IT IS RER~Ry RESOLVED, DETI~M]NI~B AND
DECI, A~ER by the City Council of the City of Temecu~ as follows:
Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.
Sealn 2. City reasonably expects to reimburse the Expenditure with proceeds from the
Obligations. The reimbursement of the Expenditure is consistent with the City's established
budgetary and financial circumstances. There are no funds or sources of money of the City, or
any related person or commonly controlled entity, that have been, or reasonable expected to be,
reserved, allocated on a long-term basis or otherwise set aside to pay costs of the Project to be
paid or reimbursed out of proceeds of the Certificates.
Section 3. This Resolution is a dec]a_ration of City's official intent under the
Reimbursement Regulations.
Section 4. The maximum principal amount of the Obligations for which the Expenditure
is made is reasonably expected to be $10,000,000.00
Section 5. The proceeds from the Obligations are to be used for the Project.
Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution and thenceforth
and thereafter same shall be in full force and effect.
PASSED, APPROVI~ ,aND ADOPTED this 24th day of March, 1992.
ATTEST:
Patricla H. Birdsall, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
ITEM 8
APPROVAr.
CITY ATTORNEY~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
DAVID F. DIXON
DATE:
APRIL 14,1992
SUBJECT:
DESIGN SERVICES - SENIOR CENTER PROJECT
PREPARED BY:
SHAWN D. NELSON, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
1)
Award a contract in the amount of $45,250 to W. Dean Davidson, A.I.A. &
Associates to provide construction documents for the Senior Center Project.
2)
Approve an advance from the General Fund Unreserved Fund Balance to the
Capital Projects Fund and appropriate $45,250 to Capital Projects Account
//021-162-801-44-5804 from Unreserved Fund Balance.
DISCUSSION: On January 28, 1992, the City Council approved the Senior
Center Project using the Old Town Facility (Bus Barn) as the preferred location for this
facility. The Old Town Facility has an approximate 4,600 square foot existing building
located on a 0.73 acre site adjacent to Sam Hicks Monument Park. The City Council
appropriated $356,960 for this project, excluding improvement costs for parking.
The preparation of construction documents are required to facilitate a public bidding
process. Staff recommends that W. Dean Davidson be awarded this contract to
prepare the construction documents based on the eligibility list from the Community
Recreation Center Project.
FISCAL IMPACT: Cost to provide these services will not exceed $45,250. It
is necessary to approve an advance from the General Fund Unreserved Fund Balance
to the capital projects fund and appropriate $45,250 to Capital Projects account
//021-162-801-44-5804 from Unreserved Fund Balance.
When the RDA Old Town Committee is formed, the advance will be repaid by RDA
if approved by this Committee,
AGRPF-MENT
FOR PROI~-~SIONAL SRRVICR~
THIS AGREElVfF-NT, made and entered into this 14th day of April, 1992, between
the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, herehailer referred to as "City* and W.
Dean Davidson. A.I.A. & Associa~,s, hereinaft~ referred to as "Consultant".
The parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit A attached
hereto.
PERFORMANCE. Consultant, shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to
the best of his ability, experience and talent, pe~orm all tasks described
herein.
PAYMENY. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the hou~y rates
set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto, based upon actual time spent on the
above tasks. This mount will not exceed $45.250.00 for the total ten of the
Agreement unless additional payment is approved by the City Council;
provided that the City Manager may appwve additional payments not to
exceed $10,000.00.
Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submiV. ed on or about the first business day of each month,
for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within
thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice.
SUSPENSION. TERMINATION OR ABANDONMENT OF AGRF-RMENT.
The City may, at any time, suspend, terminate or abandon this Agreement, or
any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior
written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately
cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise.
Within thirty-five (35) days after receiving an invoice from the Consultant, the
City shall pay Consultant for work done through the date that work is to be
ceased pursuant to this section.
If the City suspends, terminates or abandons a portion of this Agreement such
suspension, termination or abandonment shall not make void or invalidate the
remainder of this Agreement.
I slcontracUsdndeen.con 040292
gtREACH OF CONTRACT. In the event that Consultant is in default for
cause under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or
duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the
date of default. Default shall include not performing the tasks described
herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager of the City. Failure
by the .Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder, if
such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and without fault or
negligence of the Consultant, shall not be considered a default.
If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant defaults in
the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall
serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall
have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the
default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the
Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall
have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to
terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any
other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this
Agreement.
TERM. This Agreement shall commence on April 14, 19o~, and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no
event later than December 31, 1992.
Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute
between the City and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech
thereof, shall be resolved by arbitration if all parties to the dispute participate
in the arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final.
Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three
retired judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The
arbitration hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil
Procedure Section 1280, et sea_. City and Consultant shall share the cost of
the arbitration equally.
OWNF. RSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the
event of termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, all
instruments of service, including original documents, designs, drawings and
notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed
pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may
be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of
the Consultant, provided that the City shall defend, indemnify and hold
harmless Consultant from any subsequent and unauthorized reuse of said
document.
I a/contract/sdndean.con
040292
INDP-PI~-NDF. NT CONTRACTOR. The Consultant is and shall at nil times
remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor
any of its officers, employees or agents shah have control over the conduct of
the Consultant or any of the Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except
as her.in set forth. The Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner
represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner
officers, employees or agents of the City.
No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in the Agreement, City
shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for
performing services her.under for City. City shall not be liable for
compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising
out of performing services her.under.
I.EGAI. RESPONSIBILITIF-q. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of
State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those
employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to
this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all
such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not
be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply
with this section.
10.
SUBCONSULTANTS. The Consultant shall not enter into any subcontracts
for services to be rendered toward the completion of the Consultant's portion
of this Agreement without the consent of the City. At all times, Dean
Davidson. W. Dean Davidson A.I.A. & Associates, shall be primarily
responsible for the performance of the tasks described her.in. Consultant shall
provide City with fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of any
subconsultants from Consultant's employ. Upon such notice, the City shall
have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement. Upon termination of
this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be for the value of
service rendered to the City.- ·
11.
NOTICE. Whenever it shall be necessary for either party to serve notice on
the other respecting this Agreement, such notice shall be served by certified
mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the City Manager
of the City of Temecula, located at 43 172 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California 92390 and the Consultant at W. Dean Davidson. A.I.A. &
Associates. 27412 F4~terprise Circle West. Suite/201. Temecula. CA 92590
unless and until different addresses may be furnished in writing by either party
to the other. Notice shall be deemed to have been served seventy-two (72)
hours after the same has been deposited in the United States Postal Services.
This shall be valid and sufficient service of notice for all purposes.
1 e/entract/sdndeen.con 040292
12.
ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due her.under, without the
prior written consent of the City.
Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be
the value to the City of the services rendered.
13.
LIABILITY INSURANCI~.. The Consultant shall maintain insurance
acceptable to the City in full force an effect throughout the term of this
contract, against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which
may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work her.under
by the Consultant, his agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors.
Insurance is to be placed with insurer with a Bests' rating of no less than
B+ :VII. The costs of such insurance shall be included in the Contractor's
bid. The Consultant shall provide the following scope and limits of insurance:
Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
Insurance Services Office form Number GL 0002 (F.d. 1/73) covering
Comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form
number GL 0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General
Liability; or Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability
coverage ("occurrence" form CG 0001).
Insurance Services Office form no. CA 0001 (F_xl. 1/78) covering
Automobile Liability, code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA 0025.
8
Workers' Compensation insurance as required by Labor Cede of the
State of California an Employers' Liability insurance.
4. Errors and Omissions insurance.
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits of insurance
no less than:
General Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for
bodily injury and property damage.
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for
bodily injury and property damage.
1 e/contract/edndean.con
040292
3. Workers' Compensation and Employer' s Liability: Workers'
compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of California
and Employers Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident.
4. Errors and Omissions Insurance. $1,000,000. per occurrence.
r)educfibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductible in excess of $1,000
must be declared to and appwved by the City.
De
Other Insurance ProVisions. Insurance policies required by this contract shall
contain or be endorsed to contain the following pwvisions:
ae
All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be
endorsed to state that coverage shall not he canceled by either party,
except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the City via United
States First Class Mail.
General Liability and Automobile Liability coverages. The City of
Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed
operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the
Consultant, or automobiles owned, lease, hired or borrowed by the
Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the
scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers.
With regard to claims arising from the Consultant's performance of the
work described in this contract, the Consultant's insurance coverage
shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-
insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or
volunteers shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, the
Consultant's insurance.
Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shall
not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers officials,
employees or volunteers.
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to
the limits of the insurer's liability.
1 e/contrsct/sdndean.con 040292
14.
Verification of Cover'qe. Contractor shall furnish the City with
certificates of insurance effecting coverage required by this clause. The
certificates for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person
authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The
certificates are to be on forms pwvided by the City and are to be
received and approved by the City before work commences. The City
reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required
insurance policies, at any time.
Consultant shall require all subconsultants to maintain the same
insurance policies as required under this contract. All coverages for
subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated her.in.
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and
approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer
shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self insured retentions as
respects the City, its officers, officials and employees; or the Consultant
shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related
investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless
the City of Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and designated
volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense cost,
or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and
employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for
injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of
Consultant's negligent performance under the terms of this Agreement,
excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City.
15.
ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement and any documents or instrument
attached hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions
mentioned herein or incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior
writing in respect to the subject matter hereof.
1 a/contract/sdndean.con
040292
In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this
Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement
shall prevaH.
~'FFI=CHVI~. BATI=. AND I~-X'I:-CUTION: This Agreement shall be effective from
and after the date it is signed by the representatives of the City. This Agreement may be
executed in counterparts.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
CONSULTANT
CITY OF TEMF_.~ULA
By: By
Title
Patficia H. Birdsall, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
1 a/contract/edndean.con 040292
W. DEAN DAVIDSON
?'orchitecture ·
EXHIBIT "A"
a.i.a. & associates
planning
APR 0 L; 1992
CON/.. ft..fit [:,
April 8, 1992
Mr. David Dixon, City Manager
City oE Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula Ca 92590
Subject: Proposal to furnish architectural and engineering
services io~ remodeling and additions to the
Temecula Senior Center to be located at 41845 6th
Street, Temecula California.
Dear Sir;
in response to your request I would like to present
the following proposal to furnish architectural, civil and
structural engineering, mechanical and electrical engineering
services tc complete construction drawings and specifications
required ior construction oE the above project based upon
pr~!iminary designs prepared by my firm dated 2/18/92.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The project consists oE an existing tilt up concrete
building with a wood frame addition totaling approximately
4,625 square feet. It is proposed to add approximately 1,510
sqaare fleet as a new wood Iramed additi'on for a total
building area of approximately 6,162 square feet.
The building will house activities for senior citizens
including combination auditorium/dining room, kitchen with
related activities, meeting rooms,lounge, craft room, toilet
rooms and oflices. Space will be reserved for outside
activities and provision will be made ~or ~uture expansion.
SCOPE OF WORK;
Prepare complete measured as built drawings of the
existing structure for use of the Architect, other
corlsultants and contractors for the work.
Make analysis of existing structure to determine
structural modifications required for current code
compliance for the intended use.
D,~ae 1 of 5
27412 enterprise circle west, suite 201' · temecula. ca. 92590 · (714) 699-1643 fax (714) 699-2256
W. DEAN DAVIDSON o.i.a.
architecture · planning
I0.
Coordinate with selected civil engineer in'developing
required site information for use in preparing final
site drawings and specifications. Civil engineer shall
prepare plans and specifications for required site work
including grading, drainage, and utilities.
Prepare complete architectural,civil, structural,
mechanical and electrical drawings and specifications
required to obtain building permits and contractor's
bids.
Cocrdinste work of kitchen consultant, fire sprinkler
and security consultants.
Assist in preparing bid documents for use by the City of
Temecula in obtaining bids for project construction.
Assist City of Temecula in negotiations with successful
bidder if requested.
Attend meetings with concerned local groups regarding
the project when requested.
Makt-anX plan check corrections required to obtain
necessary permits
F~pare "as built" drawings at completion of the
construction contract. ..
WORK NOT INCLUDED IN THE BASIC Cb~TRACT:
2
4
5
6
7
!0.
Special consultants not listed abov~
Soils investigation
Special engineering investigation if required
Special testing
Landscape and irrigation design
Detailed interior design
Bidding and awarding of contracts
Inspection of construction and job administration
during construction
Topographic survey if ~equized is included in
Civil Engineers proposal.
Me 2 of 5
27412 enterprise circle west. suite 201 · temecula, ca. 92590 · (714) 699-1643 fax (714) 699-2256
W. DEAN DAVIDSON a.i.a. & associates
'architecture · planning
EXPENSES NOT INCLUDED IN BASIC PROPOSAL:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Reproduction of documents
Photographs or renderings
Plan check and permit fees
All construction expense
Mailing expense
Mileage in excess of 10 miles
TIME OF COMPLETION:
The work of the Basic Proposal shall be complete and
ready for submittal for plan check within eight weeks,
(56 calendar days), from date of authorization to proceed.
FEE:
The fee for the basic architectural contract including
structural , mechanical and electrical design services
shall be Thirty One Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Dollars
'~' 250 00' This amount includes $5,700 for
structural design and $4,000.00 for mechanical and
electrical design and $4,750 for civil engineering design.
Professional liability coverage in the amount of
$1,000,000.00 for a period of two years covering one year of
design and construction and one year of discovery would cost
$14,000.00. This policy would cover a~.chitectural,
structGral, civil, mechanical, electrical engineering
~o~su~tants and landscape architect This amcunt would
be in addition to the basic fee.
PAYMENT SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
Upon acceptance of proposal and authorization to proceed
25% of total fee of $31,750.00. One payment in the amount of
Se~en Thousand Nine Hundred Thirty S~ven Dollars ($7,937.00)
.... rty days ~ollowing initial payment one payment of
25% of total fee , Seven Thousand Nine Hundred Thirty Seven
Dollars {$7,937.00).
Sixty days following initial payment plans shall be ready for
submittal for plan check. An additional payment of 25% of
page 3 of 5
27412 enterprise circle west. suite 201 · temecula. ca. 92590 · (714) 699-1643 fax (714) 699-2256
W. DEAN DAVIDSON
orchitecture ·
a.i.a. & associates
planning
total fee in the amount of Seven Thousand Nine Hundred Thirty
Seven Dollars ($7,937.00) shall be made at that time.
Upon completion of plan check corrections and acceptance
for permit one payment of 25% of total fee, Seven Thousand
Nine Hundred Thirty Nine ($7,939.00)
Total payments for basic contract =$31,750.00
Insurance premium for professional liability coverage given
above shall be paid in full prior to beginning any work of
construction.
FEE FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES:
For work authorized in addition to that of the Basic Proposal
+h
~ e following fee schedule shall apply:
Archit~c!t's time ...................... $65/hr *
Senior draftsperson .................... $37/hr *
JunioL- dYafts[.erson .................... $30/hr *
Ciezi.~i ............................... $25/hr *
· Not~: these hourly rates are reduced approximately 33% from
normal killing rates.
Er~gineering consultants, Principals ............. $96/hr.
Engineerin~ Draftspersons, senior ............... $50/hr.
Engineering dial tspersons ....................... $40/hr.
CleLical Services $38/hr.
Fo~ co;~ulta~iLs oLher than those listed in the Basic Proposal
the Architect'~. fe~ would ~ 10l cf ccnsultant fees.
Costs no~ included in the Basic Proposal shall be billed
at actual cosl ~ 10%. Mileage shall be $.30 per mile.
Additional costs shall be billed monthly as incurred.
i hope the above proposal is satisfactor~ to you as we
loc. k forward to working with you on this int. eresting
and necessar~ facility. We intend to dc our best to
ins~r~ the finished buildln~ will meet all of the com&nunities
high expectations. If this preposal is acceptable i will
suLmit to ~u a standard A~,erlcan Institute of Architects
27412 enterprise circle west, suite 201 · temecula. ca. 92590 · (714) 699-1643 fax (714) 699-2256
W. DEAN DAVIDSON a.i.a. & associates
~'~rchitecture · planning
contract fbr the agreement between Owner and Architect.
our u ;
W. Dean Davidson
Architect
Accepted Date
David F. Dixon,
page 5 of 5
27412 enterprise circle west, suite 201 · temecula, ca. 92590 · (714) 699-1643 fax (714) 699-2256
ITEM 9
APPROVA X.
TY ATTORNEY
CI
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane Henry, Finance Officer
April 14, 1992
Adopt Resolution 92-
That the City Council adopt Resolution 92-
entitled:
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
OPPOSING THE REQUIREMENT THAT LOCAL AGENCIES PERFORM THE
POLICING DUTIES OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL
RELATIONS.
DISCUSSION: The State recently enacted legislation requiring cities to
obtain workers' compensation certificates from all employers before issuing a business
license. The legislation imposes an unreasonable and unanticipated burden on the
City, which is really the duty of the State Department of Industrial Relations.
Therefore, staff is requesting that the City Council adopt the attached resolution.
None
FISCAL IMPACT:
Resolution 92-
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA OPPOSING THE REQUIREM~NT THAT
LOCAL AGENCIES PERFORM CERTAIN POLICING
DUTIES OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL
RELATIONS
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Temecula agrees that all employers should
provide Workers Compensation Insurance; and
WHEREAS, the State Department of Industrial Relations is the appropriate agency to
verify compliance with the law in this regard; and
WHEREAS, inspection departments and licensing agencies within the State of California
are now required to obtain Certificates of Insurance on all businesses licensed or obtaining
building permits within their jurisdictions, however, not all businesses in the State obtain a
business license and/or a building permit, being exempted by various laws, and some local
jurisdictions do not impose license fees; and
WHEREAS, the laws that require local agencies to obtain proof of workers compensation
have now made local agencies liable for ALL INDUSTRIAL INJURIES TO ALL WORKERS
within their jurisdictions;
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
findings:
Findings. That the Temecuh City Council hereby makes the following
A. This law has increased the cost to local agencies significantly and the State has
determined that it is not required to reimburse local agencies for this mandated increased cost,
including the cost of any litigation for which the agency is now held liable.
B. This law is an unjust, costly, imposition placed on local agencies by the State
thereby reducing the State's liability, passing its responsibility on to the local agencies at a time
when local agencies are reducing staff and experiencing revenue shortfalls and increased
expenses, some of which are due to State legislation.
Section 2. Intent. The Temecula City Council does hereby declare its opposition to
this legislation and urges all licensing agencies and building departments to transmit copies of
all Insurance Certificates, listing of complaints, copies of all communications relating to this
matter, and listing of businesses to the State Department of Industrial Relations and to the
245 1 )
Legislature, along wi~ resolutions opposing this legislation until it is mended to require the
Department of Industrial Relations to take this responsibility.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOFrED, this 14th day of April, 1992.
ATI'EST:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
CITY OF TEMECULA )
SS
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temeeula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. 92- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temeeula on the 14th day of April 1992 by the following roll call vote.
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCIkMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
3~e~i2~ 2
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ITEM 10
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROV~T.
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER 7~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane Henry, Finance Officer
April 14, 1992
Purchase of Accounting Software
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the purchase of the Eden
Systems, Inc. accounting software, and appropriate $62,000 from unreserved general
fund balance.
DISCUSSION: At the time of incorporation, the City made a decision to
purchase an interim accounting software system at a cost of approximately $5,000.
This system made it possible to automate the finance system without a large
investment pending a systems analysis at a later date. The City's financial operations
have grown tremendously since incorporation. The current system has now reached
its maximum capacity averaging 600 invoices and 1 O0 purchase orders per month and
is beginning to cause numerous processing difficulties including shutting down for
several hours at a time, which results in reduced staff productivity and the possibility
of losing important financial data. '-
To address these problems, staff located three (3) vendors that provide municipal
software packages that are compatible with the City's existing hardware/operating
system. The three (3) vendors included Eden Systems, Inc., Corbin Willits Systems,
Inc. and Micro Information Products, Inc. Two (2) of the vendors made presentations
to the Finance Department staff and the third vendor sent in a demonstration copy of
their software package. Based upon the capabilities of the systems as demonstrated
in the presentations, staff is recommending that the City purchase the Eden Systems,
Inc. accounting software. Eden Systems Inc. has been in business for 13 years and
is highly recommended by a large number of municipal government clients, including
the Cities of Vista and Hemet. Eden Systems, Inc. was, as detailed below, less
expensive than the other qualified vendor. The third vendor did not provide a price
'because the product did not meet all of the specifications required. The Eden
Systems package I~rice includes licensing, installation and training for the modules
listed on Attachment
Eden Systems, Inc.
Corbin Willits Systems, Inc.
Micro Information Products, Inc.
~62,000
$72,000
~ N/A
The Finance Committee has reviewed and concurred with staff's recommendation.
FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of the Eden System, Inc. software is ~62,000
which is to be appropriated from the unreserved general fund balance.
Attachment: Eden Systems, Inc. Software Program Summary
Eden Systems, Inc. Software Program Summary
Product or Service
Financial Fund Accounting
Payroll 5.0
Personnel 5.0
Position Control
CAFR Reporting
Fixed Assets
Business License
State Controller's Report
Purchasing
Requisitioning, RFQ, RFP
IQ Report Writer
IQ Data Dictionaries
Capital Projects
Attachment "A"
I.TEM
~PPROV~T.
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Department of Public Works
April 14, 1992
Award of Professional Services Contract to Leighton & Associates for
Geotechnical Services on the Rancho California Road Benefit District
Project (PW91-03)
PREPARED BY:
Jack L. Hodson, Senior Public Works Inspector
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Award a Professional Services Contract in the amount of $7,293.00 to Leighton &
Associates for geotechnical services on the Rancho California Road Benefit District
Project (No. PW91-03), and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said Contract.
Approve an advance of $7,293.00 from the Development Impact Fee Fund to the
Capital Projects Fund and appropriate $7,293.00 to Capital Projects Account No. 021 -
165-605-44-5804.
DISCUSSION:
In January, 1992 the Department of Public Works solicited qualifications from interested
engineering firms to provide the City with compaction testing for the Rancho California Road
Benefit District Project (No. PW91-03). Three firms responded to the Request for
Qualifications No. 003. Each firm was invited to an interview, and based upon the written
responses and interviews, Leighton & Associates was selected. Subsequently, a contract
with a defined Scope of Work and an hourly budget not to exceed $7,293.00 has been
negotiated.
FISCAL IMPACT:
It is necessary to advance $7,293.00 from.the Development Impact Fee Fund to the Capital
Projects Fund and appropriate $7,293.00 to Capital Projects Account No. 021-165-605-44-
5804 from Unreserved Fund Balance.
pwO1 ~egdrpt%92\0414%pw91-03 .geo 040792
AGREEMENT
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 30th day of.
March ,19 92 · between the CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "City" and LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC., a California
corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant".
The parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A"
attached her.to. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the
schedule set forth in Exhibit "A".
PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to
the best of his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described
herein.
PAYMENT. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the hourly rates
set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, based upon actual time spent on the
above tasks. This amount will not exceed ~7,293.00 for the total term of
the Agreement unless additional payment is approved by the City Council;
provided that the City Manager may approve additional payments not to
exceed ten percent (10%) of the Agreement, but in no event more than
$10,000.00.
Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month.
for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within
thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice.
SUSPENSION. TERMINATION OR ABANDONMENT OF AGREEMENT. The
City may, at any time, suspend, terminate or abandon this Agreement, or
any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days
prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall
immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides
otherwise. Within thirty-five (35) days after receiving an invoice from the
Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for work done through the date
that work is to be ceased pursuant to this section.
If the City suspends, terminates, or abandons a portion of this Agreement,
such suspension, termination, or abandonment shall not make void or
invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
21forrnslARG-04 Rev 8123/91 -1 - pwOl\rfp\OO3\profsvc..agt 032492
BREACH OF CONTRACT. In the event that Consultant is in default for
cause under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation
or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after
the date of default. Default shall include not performing the tasks described
herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager of the City. Failure
by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder,
if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and without fault or
negligence of the Consultant, shall not be considered a default.
If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant defaults
in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it
shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant
shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure
the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the
Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall
have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to
terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any
other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this
Agreement.
TERM. This Agreement shall commence on April 15, 1992, and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no
event later than December 1, 1992.
Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute
between the City and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech
thereof, shall be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be
final.
Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three
retired judges of Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The
arbitration hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil
Procedure Section 1280, et seo. City and Consultant shall share the cost
of the arbitration equally.
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the
event of termination, suspension, or abandonment of this Agreement, all
original documents, designs, drawings and notes prepared in the course of
providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall
become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused, or otherwise
disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant.
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The Consultant is and shall at all times
remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor
any of its officers, employees, or agents shall have control over the conduct
21forrnslARG-04 Rev 812319 1
-2- pw01~rfp\O03\profsvcs.agt 032492
10.
11.
12.
of the Consultant or any of the Consultant's officers, employees, or agents,
except as herein set forth. The Consultant shall not at any time or in any
manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees, or agents are in
any manner officers, employees, or agents of the City.
No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in the Agreement, City
shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for
performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for
compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising
out of performing services hereunder.
LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIFS. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of
State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those
employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant
to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply
with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees,
shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant
to comply with this section.
NOTICE. Whenever it shall be necessary for either party to serve notice on
the other respecting this Agreement, st~ch notice shall be served by certified
mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the City
Manager of the City of Temecula, located at 43174 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California 92590, and to the Consultant at 40935 County Center
Drive, Suite A, Temecula, CA 92591, unless and until different addresses
may be furnished in writing by either party to the other. Notice shall be
deemed to have been served seventy-two (72) hours after the same has
been deposited in the United States Postal Services. This shall be valid and
sufficient service of notice for all purposes.
-:.
ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part ther. eof, nor any monies due hereunder, without the
prior written consent of the City.
Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall
be the value to the City of the services rendered.
LIABILITY INSURANCE. The Consultant shall maintain insurance acceptable
to the City in full force an effect throughout the term of this contract,
against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may
arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by
the Consultant, his agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors.
Insurance is to be placed with insurer with a Bests' rating of no less than
2/formslARG-04 Rev 8123/91 -3- pwO1\rfp%OO3%ptofeve$.egt 032492
A:VII. The costs of such insurance shall be included in the Contractor's bid.
The Consultant shall provide the following scope and limits of insurance:
A. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
Insurance Services Office form Number GL-0002 (Ed. 1/73)
covering Comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services
Office form number GL-0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive
General Liability; or Insurance Services Office Commercial General
Liability coverage ("occurrence" form CG-0001 ).
Insurance Services Office form number CA-0001 (Ed. 1/78)
covering Automobile Liability, code I "any auto" and endorsement
CA-0025.
Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the Labor Code
of the State of California and Employers' Liability insurance.
4. Errors and Omissions insurance.
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits of
insurance no less than: ~
General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per
occurrence for bodily injury and property damage.
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per
accident for bodily injury and property damage.
Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability: Workers'
Compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of
California and Employers' Liability limits of $1,000,000 per
accident.
4. Errors and Omissions Insurance. $1,000,000 per occurrence.
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductible in excess of
$1,000 must be declared to and approved by the City.
Other Insurance Provisions. Insurance policies required by this contract
shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be
endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided,
canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except
21forms/ARG-04 Rev 812319 1
4- pw01\rfp%003\profsvcs.ag! 032492
after thirty {30) days' prior written notice to the City via United
States First Class Mail.
General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages. The City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as
insureds as respects: Liability arising out of activities performed
by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed
operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used
by the Consultant, or automobiles owned, lease, hired or
borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no
special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City,
its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
With regard to claims arising from the Consultant's performance
of the work described in this contract, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or
self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers shall apply in excess of, and not
contribute with, the Consultant's insurance.
Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies
shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers,
officials, employees, or volunteers.
The. Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with
respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
Worker's Comoensation and Emolovers' Liability Coverage. The
insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the
City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses
arising from work performed by the Consultant for the City.
Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with
certificates of insurance affecting coverage required by this clause
(See Exhibit "C"). The certificates for each insurance policy are
to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind
coverage on its behalf. The certificates are to be on forms
provided by the City and are to be received and approved by the
City before work commences. The City reserves the right to
require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies
at any time.
2/forrnslARG-04 Rev 8~23~91
-5- pwOl\rfp\O03~orofsvcs.agt 032492
Consultant shall include all subconsultants as insureds under its
policies or shall furnish separate certificates for each
subcontractoro All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject
to all of the requirements stated herein.
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and
approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the
insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured
retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, and
employees; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing
payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration
and defense expenses.
13.
14.
INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless
the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers from and against
any and all claims, demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or
nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or
incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons,
or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent performance
under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the
sole negligence of the City.
ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement and any documents or instrument
attached hereto or referred' to herein integrate all terms and conditions
mentioned herein or incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior
writing in respect to the subject matter hereof.
In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this Agreement
and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement
shall prevail.
EFFECTIVE DATE AND EXECUTION: This Agreement shall be effective from and after
the date it is signed by the representatives of the City. This Agreement may be
executed in counterparts.
2/formslARG-04 Rev 812319 1
-6- IowOl\rfp%003\profsvcs.agt 032492
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to
executed the day and year first above written.
LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Director of Engineering
By
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
be
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
A'i'i'EST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
2/formalARGo04 Rev 8123/91 -7- pwOl~rfp\OO3~profsvcs.,,gt 032492
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
Perform laboratory testing on sampled so~ to obtain maximum dry density/optimum moisture,
R-value and Sand Equivalent results.
Perform field density testing during rough grading operations.
Provide daily field reports summarizing daily activities.
Prepare pavement design based upon R-value test results.
Perform field density testing for storm drain backfill, curb and gutter subgrade, sidewalk
subFade, sweet subFade and aggregate base afte, r compaction efforts.
Summarize our findings in (1) final compaction report at the completion work performed.
EXHIBrr
EXHIBIT
PAYMENT S~ULE
· FPRI,I~ WORK *
5oil Tech-lcian I 80 hours @ $52 hour $4,160
Field Superv~ion 8 hours @ $77 hour 616
* Field work includes: sampling soih and materials, observation and field density testing of storm
drain backfill; curb/gutter and ridewalk, rough grading (removal and recompac~on) - fill placement,
subgrade and aggregate bast
· LABORATORY TESTING (include~ aggregate base tests and subgrade materials)
Maximum Dry Density 7 @ $110 each
Sand Equivalent 3 @ $45 each
R-value 2 @ $165 each
Sieve Analysis 2 @ $50 each
770
135
330
100
· ENGINEERING ~
Pavement Design 162
2 - Meetings 220
· REPORT
Final Compaction Report
8OO
Total $7,293.00
80 hours for field work are based upon 50 day project completion schedule. Project totals are based
upon Exhibit B. Accrued expenses ~ire calculated on a time-and-materials basis, not to exceed
$7,293. L&A Proj. No. 6920190-01
AGREEMENT
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 30th day of
Hatch ,19 92 , between the CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "City" and LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC., a California
corporalin, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant".
The parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A"
attached her.to. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the
schedule set forth in Exhibit "A" .
PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to
the best of his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described
herein.
e
PAYMENT. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the hourly rates
set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, based upon actual time spent on the
above tasks. This amount will not exceed ~7,293.00 for the total term of
the Agreement unless additional payment is approved by the City Council;
provided that the City Manager may approve additional payments not to
exceed ten percent (10%) of the Agreement, but in no event more than
$10,000.00.
Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month,
for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within
thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice.
SUSPENSION, TERMINATION OR ABANDONMENT OF AGREEMENT. The
City may, at any time, suspend, terminate or abandon this Agreement, or
any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days
prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall
immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides
otherwise. Within thirty-five (35) days after receiving an invoice from the
Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for work done through the date
that work is to be ceased pursuant to this section.
If the City suspends, terminates, or abandons a portion of this Agreement,
such suspension, termination, or abandonment shall not make void or
invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
2/forms/ARG-04 Rev 812319 1
-1 - pwOl%rfp~,O03%profsvcs.egt 032492
e
e
BREACH OF CONTRA(~T. In the event that Consultant is in default for
cause under the terms of this Agreement. the City shall have no obligation
or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after
the date of default. Default shall include not performing the tasks described
her.in to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager of the City. Failure
by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work her. under,
if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and without fault or
negligence of the Consultant. shall not be considered a default.
If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant defaults
in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement. it
shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant
shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure
the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the
Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall
have the right. notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to
terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any
other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this
Agreement.
TERM. This Agreement shall commence on April 15, 1992, and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no
event later than December 1, 1992.
Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute
between the City and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech
thereof. shall be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be
final.
Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three
retired judges of Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The
arbitration hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil
Procedure Section 1280, et seo. City and Consultant shall share the cost
of the arbitration equally.
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the
event of termination, suspension, or abandonment of this Agreement, all
original documents, designs, drawings end notes prepared in the course of
providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall
become the sole property of the City and may be used. reused, or otherwise
disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant.
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The Consultant is and shall at all times
remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor
any of its officers, employees, or agents shall have control over the conduct
2/formslARG-O4 Rev 8/23/91 -2- pwOl~rfp~,OO3~proflvcs.egt 032492
10.
11.
12.
of the Consultant or any of the Consultant's officers, employees, or agents,
except as herein set forth. The Consultant shall not at any time or in any
manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees, or agents are in
any manner officers, employees, or agents of the City.
No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in the Agreement, City
shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for
performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for
compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising
out of performing services hereunder.
LFGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of
State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those
employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant
to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply
with all such laws and regulations. The City, end its officers and employees,
shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant
to comply with this section.
NOTICE. Whenever it shall be necessary for either party to serve notice on
the other respecting this Agreement, such notice shall be served by certified
mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the City
Manager of the City of Temecula, located at 43174 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California 92590, and to the Consultant at 40935 County Center
Drive, Suite A, Temecula, CA 92591, unless and until different addresses
may be furnished in writing by either party to the other. Notice shall be
deemed to have been served seventy-two (72) hours after the same has
been deposited in the United States Postal Services. This shall be valid and
sufficient service of notice for all purposes.
ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without the
prior written consent of the City.
Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall
be the value to the City of the services rendered.
LIABILITY INSURANCE. The Consultant shall maintain insurance acceptable
to the City in full force an effect throughout the term of this contract,
against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may
arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by
the Consultant, his agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors.
Insurance is to be placed with insurer with a Bests' rating of no less than
21formslARG-04 Rev 8123191
-3- pwO1%rfp%OO3~,profsvcs.agt 032492
A:VII. The costs of such insurance shall be included in the Contractor's bid.
The Consultant shall provide the following scope and limits of insurance:
A. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
elI ·
Insurance Services Office form Number GL-0002 (Ed. 1/73)
covering Comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services
Office form number GL-0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive
General Liability; or Insurance Services Office Commercial General
Liability coverage ("occurrence" form CG-0001 ).
Insurance Services Office form number CA-0001 (Ed. 1/78)
covering Automobile Liability, code I "any auto" and endorsement
CA-0025.
Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the Labor Code
of the State of California and Employers' Liability insurance.
4. Errors and Omissions insurance.
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits of
insurance no less than:
General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per
occurrence for bodily injury and property damage.
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per
accident for bodily injury and property damage·
Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability: Workers'
Compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of
California and Employers' Liability limits of $1,000,000 per
accident.
4. Errors and Omissions Insurance. $1,000,000 per occurrence.
Deduct, bias and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductible in excess of
$1,000 must be declared to and approved by the City.
Other Insurance provisions. Insurance policies required by this contract
shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be
endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided,
canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except
21forms/ARG-04 Rev 8123/91 4- pw01%rfp\003%profsvce,agt 032492
after thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the City via United
States First Class Mail.
General Liability and Automobile Liability Coveracjles. The City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as
· insureds as respects: Liability arising out of activities performed
by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed
operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used
by the Consultant, or automobiles owned, lease, hired or
borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no
special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City,
its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
With regard to claims arising from the Consultant's performance
of the work described in this contract, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or
self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers shall apply in excess of, and not
contribute with, the Consultant's insurance.
Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies
shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers,
officials, employees, or volunteers.
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with
respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
Worker's Compensation and Employers' Liability Coveracje. The
insurer shall agree to waive'all rights of subrogation against the
City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses
arising from work performed by the Consultant for the City.
Verification of CoveracJe. Contractor shall furnish the City with
certificates of insurance eftacting coverage required by this clause
(See Exhibit "C"). The certificates for each insurance policy are
to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind
coverage on its behalf. The certificates are to be on forms
provided by the City and are to be received and approved by the
City before work commences. The City reserves the right to
require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies
at any time.
2/formslARG-04 Rev 8123/91
-5- pwO1%rfp~O03%profsvcs.agt 032492
Consultant shall include all subconsultants as insureds under its
policies or shall furnish separate certificates for each
subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject
to all of the requirements stated herein.
.. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and
approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the
insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured
retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, and
employees; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing
payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration
and defense expenses.
13.
INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless
the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers from and against
any and all claims, demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or
nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or
incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons,
or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent performance
under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the
sole negligence of the City.
14.
ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement and any documents or instrument
attached hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions
mentioned herein or incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior
writing in respect to the subject matter hereof.
In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this Agreement
and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement
shall prevail.
.:.
EFFECTIVE DATE AND EXECUTION: This Agreement shall be effective from and after
the date it is signed by the representatives of the City. This Agreement may be
executed in counterparts.
21formslARG-O4 Rev 8123/91 '6- pwOl%rfp~,OO3~orofev,Js.agt 032492
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to
executed the day and year first above written.
LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
CITY OF TEMECULA
By S~.
Director of Engineering
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
be
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
21formslARG-04 Rev 8123191
-7-
pw01\rfp\003\profsvcs.agt 032492
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
Perform laboratory t~ting on sampled soils to obtain maximum dry density/optimum moisture,
R-value and Sand Equivalent results.
Perform field density t~ting during rough grading operations.
Provide daily field reports summarizing daily activities.
Prepare pavement design based upon R-value test results.
Perform field density testing for storm drain backfill, curb and gutter subgrade, sidewalk
subgrade, street subgrade and aggregate base after compaction efforts.
Summarize our findings in (1) final compaction report at the completion work performed.
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
· Flown WORK *
Soft Technician I 80 hours @ $52 hour $4,160
Field Supervision 8 hours @ $77 hour 616
Field work includes: sampling soils and materials, observation and field density testing of storm
drain backfill; curb/gutter and sidewalk, wugh grading (removal and recompaction) - fill placement,
subgrade and aggregate bee.
· LABORATORY TESTING (includes aggregate base tests and subgrade materials)
Maximum Dry Density 7 @ $110 each
Sand Equivalent 3 @ $45 each
R-value 2 @ $165 each
Sieve Analysis 2 @ $50 each
770
135
330
100
· ENGIN~_,RING
Pavement Design 162
2 - Meetings 220
· REPORT
Final Compaction Report
8OO
Total $7,293.00
80 hours for field work are based upon 50 day project completion schedule. Project totals are based
upon Exhibit B. Accrued expenses are calculated on a time-and-materials basis, not to exceed
$7,293. L&A Proj. No. 6920190-01
EXHIBIT "B"