HomeMy WebLinkAbout122000 PC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will
enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR
35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
A REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
DECEMBER 20, 2000 - 6:00 P.M.
Next in Order:
Resolution: No. 2000-041
CALL TO ORDER:
Flag Salute:
Roll Call:
Commissioner Webster
Chiniaeff, Mathewson, Telesio, Webster, and Chairman Guerriero
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission
on items that are listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each.
If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the
Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three
(3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and ail will
be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the
Consent Calendar for separate action.
A,qenda
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Agenda of December 20, 2000.
R:~PLANCOMM~Agendas~2000\I 2-20-00.doc
1
COMMISSION BUSINESS
'2 Director's Hearing Report - receive and file
3 Harveston Workshop - Villa.qe Center/Parks
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of
the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you
may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public
· hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or
prior to, the public hearing.
4
Planninq Application No. 00-0276 (Development Plan) to desi.qn and construct a 15,883
square foot office buildin.q (Keeton Buildin.q), on a .64 acre lot located at the southwest
knuckle of Enterprise Circle north and known as Assessors Parcel No. 909-282-013 -
Thomas Thornsley
4.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental
Quality Act Guidelines and;
4.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION No. 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. 00-0276 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION OF A 15,883 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE
BUILDING (KEETON BUILDING), ON A .64 ACRE LOT
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST KNUCKLE OF ENTERPRISE
CIRCLE NORTH, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-
282-013,
Plannin,q Application No. 00-0332(Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan) to desi,qnl
construct, and operate a 16,726 square foot church on 5.2 vacant acres within Plannin.q
Area 2 of the Campos Verdes Specific Plan on the south side of north General Kearny Road
and known as Assessors Parcel No. 921-090-079 - Rolfe Preisendanz
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. 00-0332 A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/DEVELOPMENT
PLAN TO DESIGN, CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A t6,726
SQUARE FOOT CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-
DAY SAINTS ON 5.2 VACANT ACRES WITHIN PLANNING
AREA 2 OF THE CAMPOS VERDES SPECIFIC PLAN ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 92t-090-079
R:\PLANCOMM~Agendas~2000\I 2-20-00.doc
2
6
Planning Application No. 00-0257(Conditional Use Permit) to design, constructI and operate
an unmanned Sprint PCS wireless telecommunication facility at the Rancho California Water
District's Norma Marsh Reservoir site located at 41520 MarRarita Road and known as
Assessor's Parcel No. 940-230-002 - Rolfe Preisendanz
6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. 00-0287, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO DESIGN,
CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A UNMANNED SPRINT
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY LOCATED AT THE
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT'S NORMA MARSHA
RESERVOIR SITE LOCATED AT 41520 MARGARITA ROAD
AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 940-230-002
7
Plannin,q Application No. 00-0389 (Development Plan) to desicln, construct, and operate a
38,349 square foot industrial building for Nascal Interplex, Inc. on 4.09 vacant acres within
the Westside Business Centre located on the south side of Remington Avenue and known
as Assessors Parcel No. 909-370-013- Rolfe Preisendanz
7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. 00-0389, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO DESIGN,
CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A 38,349 SQUARE FOOT
INDUSTRIAL BUILDING FOR NASCAL INTERPLEX, INC. ON
4.09 VACANT ACRES WITHIN WESTSIDE BUSINESS
CENTRE, PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP 24085-3. GENERALLY
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF REMINGTON AVENUE
AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 909-370-0t 3;
COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: January 3, 2001, Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
R:\PLANCOMM~Agendas~2000\I 2-20-00.doc
3
ITEM #2
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Debbie Ubnoskb,';'tDirector of Planning
December 12, 2000
Director's Hearing Case Update
Planning Director's Agenda items for November, 2000
Date Case No. Proposal Applicant Action
Nov. 16, 2000 PA00-0383 This Minor Conditional Use Willing (Buck) Continued to
Permit is a request to sell and Lynne Nov. 20,
alcohol with a license for "off Ramsey 2000
sale beer and wine" in
conjunction a 5000 square
foot convenience market/gas
station (Ultramar) which
includes facilities for a drive-
thru restaurant.
Nov. 20, 2000 PA00-0383 This Minor Conditional Use Willing (Buck) Approved
Permit is a request to sell and Lynne
alcohol with a license for "off Ramsey
sale beer and wine" in
conjunction a 5000 square
foot convenience market/gas
station (Ultramar) which
inctudes facilities for a drive-
thru restaurant.
Nov. 30, 2000 PA00-0444 Planning application to Norm Reeves Approved
operate a parking lot for the Super Group
delivery and storage of new
and used vehicles.
Attachments:
1. Action Agendas - Blue Page 2
R:\DIRHEAR\MEMOY2000\November 2000.memo.doc
1
ATI'ACHMENT NO. 1
ACTION AGENDAS
R:\DIRHEAR\MEMO\2000\November 2000.memo.doc
2
ACTION AGENDA
TEMECULA DIRECTOR'S HEARING
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 20, 2000 1:30 PM
TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
CALL TO ORDER: Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address to the Planning
Manager on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3)
minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Senior Planner about an item no~t listed on the
Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Senior
Planner.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Senior
Planner before that item is heard. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
Case No:
Case Name
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Case Planner:
ACTION:
Planning Application No. PA00-0383 (Minor Conditional Use
Permit).
Ultramar Gas Station/Market
Willing (Buck) & Lynne Ramsey
787 Avocado Ct., Del Mar, CA 29014
40720 Winchester Road on the south side of Winchester Road
midway between Ynez Road and Margarita Road, at the Promenade
Mall (APN 910-320-028).
This application is a request to sell alcohol with a license for "off sale
beer and wine" in conjunction with a 5000 square foot convenience
markeFgas station (Ultrmar) which includes facilities for a drive-thru
restaurant.
This project is Categorically Exempt from CEQA under Sec. 15301
(Existing Facilities) because it consists of the permitting and
licensing of an existing private structure, for use as a convenience
market, involving negligible expansion of use beyond that existing at
the time of the city's original approval of this facility.
Thomas Thornsley
APPROVED
P:\PLANNING\DIRHEAR\2000\ 11-16430 AGENDA.doc
ACTION AGENDA
TEMECULA DIRECTOR'S HEARING
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 30, 2000 1:30 PM
TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
CALL TO ORDER: Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address to the Planning
Manager on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3)
minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Senior Planner about an item no~t listed on the
Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Senior
Planner.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Senior
Planner before that item is heard. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
Case No:
Case Name:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Case Planner:
Recommendation:
Action:
Planning Application No. PA00-0444 (Minor Conditional Use
Permit)
Norm Reeves Parking New and Used Vehicle Lot
Norm Reeves Super Group
Northeast corner of Solana Way and Motor Car Parkway.
Planning Application to operate a parking lot for the delivery and
storage of new and used vehicles
This project is categorically exempt per Article 19, Section 15301 of
the California Environmental Quality Act
Rolfe Preisendanz
Approval
Approved
P:\PLANNING\DIRHEAR\2000\ 11-30-00 AGENDA.doc
ITEM #3
Harveston Workshop - Village Center/Parks
ITEM #4
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMiSSiON
December 20, 2000
Planning Application No. 00-0276
(Development Plan)
Prepared By: Thomas Thornsley, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff
recommends the Planning Commission:
1. ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-
0276 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION OF A 15,883 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING
(KEETON BUILDING), ON A .64 ACRE LOT LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHWEST KNUCKLE OF ENTERPRISE CIRCLE NORTH,
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-282-013.
ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA00-
0276 pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental
Quality Act Guidelines.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
Keeton Trust, Bruce G. Keeton, 43280 Business Park Dr.
Ste. 201, Temecula, CA 92590
The design and construction of a 15,883 square foot office
building on a .64 acre lot.
At the southwest knuckle of Enterprise Circle North [the
empty building pad north of 41582 Enterprise Circle North
(APN 909-282-013)].
BP (Business Park)
BP (Business Park)
North:
South:
East:
West:
BP (Business Park)
SC (Service Commercial)
CC (Community Commercial)
BP (Business Park)
R:\D P\00-0276 Keeton Trust\Staff report 276pa00.doc
1
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
Parking lot with a vacant pad area.
North: Industrial businesses
South: Bank building
East: Office building
West: Industrial businesses
PROJECT STATISTICS
Total Area:
Total Building Area:
Building Footprint:
Landscape Area:
Paved Area:
Parking Required:
Parking Provided:
Parking Required/Minor Exception:
27,878 square feet
15,883 square feet
7,713 square feet
6,860 square feet
13,305 square feet
(.64 acre)
57.0%
27.5%
25.0%
47.5%
Habitable office area of 11,685 square feet = 39 spaces
1 space per 300 square feet
34 spaces (26 standard spaces, 6 compact spaces (18%), 2
handicapped accessible spaces) plus 3 bicycles racks.
39 spaces less 15%: 33.15 spaces
Building Height:
Varies 26 to 31 feet
BACKGROUND
The applicant began working with the City this summer when they submitted a formal application to
the Planning Department on July 12, 2000. A Development Review Committee meeting was held on
August 10, 2000, and the project was deemed complete on December 4, 2000.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing a Development Plan to design and construct a two story, 15,883 square
foot office building referred to as the Keeton Building on a .64 acre site. This office building will be
the combined offices of Keeton Construction, Markham Development Management Group, Inc., and
the Alhambra Group Landscape Architecture.
ANALYSIS
Site Desiqn and Circulation
This project is located on a 27,878 square foot corner lot. The building is on the corner fronting the
streets. Shared points of ingress and egress to the streets are at the northwest and southeast
corners of the site providing access to this site and the bank to the south. Parking is provided
adjacent to the building and a single row of parking is provided in front of the building parallel to the
western entry drive aisle.
R:\D P\00-0276 Keeton Trus~Staff report 276pa00.doc
2
Parkinq Analysis
As calculated by the City's parking standards for office use there should be 39 parking spaces. As
designed, the applicant is proposing 34 parking stalls. The applicant has made a request for a
minor exception to reduce the required number of parking spaces based on their actual needs and
calculating only the habitable floor area of the building. Staff supports this request because it falls
within the 15% allowable reduction for parking requirements as permitted by the Development Code
under Minor Exceptions (Sec. 17.03.060 B. 1 .) and the request is not expected to create any future
parking problems.
Architecture & Colors
The building is designed for office use and is designed to maximize intemal floor space according to
the applicant's needs while providing an enhanced architectural appearance. All four sides of the
building will be multi-facetted with pop-outs framing the recessed first floor window. These features
are finished with off-white stucco and the lower half of the columns, between the windows, will be
wrapped with a red sandstone veneer. All four corners of the first floor and the entire second floor
exterior will be finished with blue glass and capped with a stucco cornice. At the center of the
building the fa(;ade will be taller and the building face will arch out away from the vertical plane of the
building elevation to draw attention to the main entry.
Landscapinq
Twenty-five pement (25%) of the site has been landscaped. This is consistent with the twenty-five
percent minimum landscaping requirement in the BP (Business Park) zone. The bulk of the
landscaping is provided along the street frontages. The street trees are Liquidambar along the east
side and Camphors tree on the north. Flowering Pear and Canary Island Pine complete the street
side planting adjacent to the building. Queen Palms are used to show off the building from the
internal sides of the building accenting and complimenting the building's architecture. To further
enhance the appearance of the tree planting, most trees are proposed to be 24 inch box with
planting heights from 7 to 10 feet.
The handicapped parking in front of the building will serve a duel purpose as parking and an
extension of the entry plaza. The two handicapped parking spaces will be finished with decorative
concrete and are flanked by two planters into which the applicant proposes to relocate two existing
Flowering Pear trees that are healthy and large. Around the base of the building will be a mix of
large and small shrubs and flowing plants. Turf is used around the outer most perimeters adjacent to
the public sidewalk. Staff has conditioned the applicant to provide staffwith the proposed locations
of the various utility items that will be installed to serve this building so that they will be properly
screened or placed out of view pdor to installation in the landscape areas.
Minor Exceptions and FAR
With the development of this site the applicant has proposed two minor exceptions relating to the
required parking and the building setback and to exceed the target floor area ratio. As discussed
under the Parking Analysis staff feels confident that site will operate effectively without creating any
complications that would impact the public health and safety of adjacent properties. The
Development Code requires a 10 foot building set back from the street under the Business Park
zoning. A minor exception allows for a 15% reduction that permits a setback of 8 % feet and the
applicant is proposing 9 feet. The building's encroachment into the setback involves architectural
relief features and the second floor overhang. Staff has considered this request and finds that the
quality of the amhitecture and the enhanced right-of-way landscaping will more that offset the
exception to the building setback without having any adverse effects.
R:\D P\00-0276 Keeton Trust~Staff report 276pa00.doc
3
The total square footage of this building, based on the outside dimensions, puts the floor area ratio
(FAR) at .57 while the Development Code has a target ratio set at .40 FAR. In accordance with the
code the FAR can go as high 1.0 if certain incentives for increasing the FAR are offered. Those
criteria in Section 17.08.050 are as follows:
1. The project includes use(s) which provide outstanding and exceptional benefits to the city
with respect to the employment, fiscal, social and economic needs of the community.
2. The project provides exceptional architectural and landscape design amenities which reflect
an attractive image and character for the city.
3. The project provides enhanced public facilities that are needed by the city, beyond those
required mitigation impact measures.
Attached is a letter from the applicant outlining how they believe they are qualifying for the FAR
increase related to the first two criteria. Staff has reviewed their request and concurs with the
comments relating to the exceptional architectural and landscaping proposed for this project.
Considering the limited increase over the target ratio for this project it appears that they easily meet
the criteria outlined in the code and staff would recommend approval of the increase in the floor area
ratio.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Staff has reviewed the project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Based
upon staff's review, the proposed project is eligible for a CEQA exemption pursuant to Section
15332 of the CEQA Guidelines based on the following reasons:
· The site is .64 acres which is less than the 5 acres required.
· The proposed development is consistent with the existing development in the area.
· The site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species.
· The site will be adequately served by public utilities and services.
· The Keeton office building is being approved pursuant to the zoning and general plan
designations for the site.
EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
The General Plan Land Use designation for the site is Business Park (BP). Existing zoning for the
site is BP (Business Park). A variety of commercial uses are permitted within this zone, with the
approval of a Development Plan pursuant to Chapter 17.05 of the Development Code. The project
as proposed, meets all minimum standards of and is consistent with, the General Plan,
Development Code and the Design Guidelines.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The project has been determined by staff to be consistent with applicable City policies, standards
and guidelines. We believe it is compatible with the nature and quality of surrounding development,
and will represent an attractive addition to the City's commercial/office uses.
R:\D P\00-0276 Keeton Trust~Staff report 276pa00.doc
4
FINDINGS - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The proposal, an office building, is consistent with the land use designation and policies
reflected in the Business Park (BP) land use standards in the City of Temecula General
Plan, as well as the development standards for Business Park (BP) contained in the City's
Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be
physically suitable for the type and density of office/commercial development proposed. The
project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law
and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City
Wide Design Guidelines, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), the City's
Water Efficient Landscaping provisions, and fire and building codes.
The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other
associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and
safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as
conditioned has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines,
standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and
function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare.
Attachments:
1.
PC Resolution - Blue Page 6
Exhibit A. Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 9
Keeton Letter Dated December 1,2000 - Blue Page 19
Exhibits - Blue Page 20
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C. General Plan
D. Site Plan
E. Elevation
F. Landscape Plan
R:\D P\00-0276 Keeton Trust\Staff report 276pa00.doc
5
ATrACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
R:\D P\00-0276 Keeton Trust~Staff report 276pa00.doc
6
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-
0276 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION OF A 15,883 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING
(KEETON BUILDING), ON A .64 ACRE LOT LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHWEST KNUCKLE OF ENTERPRISE CIRCLE NORTH,
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-282-0t3.
WHEREAS, Keeton Trust, filed Planning Application No. 00-0276, in accordance with the
City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. 00-0276 was processed including, but not limited to
public notice, in the time and manner proscribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considerod Planning Application No. 00-0276 on
December 20, 2000, at a duly noticed public hearing as proscribed by law, at which time the City
staff and interosted persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to
this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. 00-0276;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. Findin.qs. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. 00-
0276 hereby makes the following findings as roquirod by Section 17.05.010.F of the Temecula
Municipal Code:
A. The proposal, an office building, is consistent with the land use designation and
policies reflected in the Business Park (BP) land use standards in the City of Temecula General
Plan, as well as the development standards for Business Park (BP) contained in the City's
Development Code. The site is therofore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically
suitable for the type and density of commercial development proposed. The project, as conditioned,
is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, Ordinance No. 655
(Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions, and fire and
building codes.
B. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and
other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and safety
of those working in and around the site. The project has been roviewed for, and as conditioned has
been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and rogulations
intended to ensuro that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent
with the public health, safety and welfaro.
R:\D P\00-0276 Keeton Trust\Staff report 276pa00.doc
7
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 00-
0276 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill
Development Projects, Class 32). This project is an in-fill development and it meets the following
criteria:
· The site is .64 acres which is less than the 5 acres required.
· The proposed development is consistent with the existing development in the area.
· The site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species.
· The site will be adequately served by public utilities and services.
· The Keeton office building is being approved pursuant to the zoning and general
plan designations for the site.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves Planning Application No. 00-0276 for a Development Plan to build a 15,883
square foot office building on a .64 acre lot at southwest knuckle of Enterprise Circle North, and
known as Assessor Parcel No's. 909-282-013. The Conditions of Approval are contained in Exhibit
A.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of December, 2000.
Ron Guerriero, Chairperson
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula a regular meeting thereof, held on the 20th day of December,
2000, by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\D P\00-0276 Keeton Trust\Staff report 276pa00.doc
8
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
R:\D P\00-0276 Keeton Trust\Staff report 276pa00.doc
9
Project Description:
EXHIBIT A
' CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. 00-0276 (Development Plan)
The design and construction of a 15,883 square foot
office building on a .64 acre lot, located atthe southwest
knuckle of Enterprise Circle North.
DIF Category: Office
Assessor Parcel No.:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
909-282-013
December 20, 2000
December 20, 2002
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1. The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department- Planning Division a
cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of seventy-
eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice
of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California
Code of Regulations Section 15062. Ifwithin said forty-eight (48) hourperiod the applicant
has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check
as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of
condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
General Requirements
2. The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency
or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all
claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary
damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof,
advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters
of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the
appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4
(Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167).
The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding
brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the
action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional
deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions
of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly
notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify,
defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its
R:\D P\00-0276 Keeton Trust\Staff report 276pa00.doc
10
=
10.
officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit,
the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the applicant.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "D"
(Site Plan), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning
Division. Additionally, the following criteria must be met prior to development of the project:
a. All ground mounted utility/mechanical equipment shall be located such that they are
not placed in prominent locations visible to the public.
b. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and
electrical plans for verification of acceptable placement of the transformer and the
double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies.
c. If the limited landscape area between the right-of-way and the building make
screening difficult or ineffective the Director of Planning may request more stringent
screening, methods such as screen/retaining walls and/or undergrounding of the
utility/mechanical equipment.
Any outside wall-mounted lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. Those lights shown on the elevation plan as
"typical exterior building lighting" shall be a decorative type complimentary to the building.
Details of these lights shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review prior to
installation.
All parking lot lights and other exterior lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted
to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply with the
requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655.
Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "E" (Building
Elevations), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning
Division. All mechanical and roof-mounted equipment shall be hidden by building elements
that were designed for that purpose as an integral part of the building. When determined to
be necessary by the Director of Planning, the parapet will be raised to provide for this
screening.
Landscaping shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "F" (Landscape Plan).
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Director of Planning. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Director of Planning shall have the authority to require the properly owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest. Additionally, the following cdteda must be met pdor to development of
the project:
The colors and materials for this project shall substantially conform to the following list of
approved colors and materials and with the Color and Material Board contained on file with
the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Any deviation from the
approved colors and materials shall require approval of the Director of Planning.
The long expanse of the raised center portion of the second floor running the depths of the
building shall be finished with same gazing system used on the exterior of the building.
R:\D P\00-0276 Keeton Trust\Staff report 276pa00.doc
11
Material
Windows, doors
Cornices
Stucco first floor projections
Base and column accent veneer
Color
Aluminum frames with dark blue glazing
La Harbra Stucco, Aspen X-23
La Harbra Stucco, Aspen X-23
Red Sand Stone (Morning Glory, Sandstone)
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
11. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
bythe Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one signed
set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files.
12. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
13. An application for a lot merger shall be submitted for the parcels involved with this project.
14. The applicant shall revise Exhibits "D, E & F", (Site Plan, Elevations, Landscape Plan, Color
and Matedal Board) to reflect the final Conditions of Approval and submit five (5) full size
copies.
15. The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color
and Materials Board and of the colored version of approved Exhibit "E", the colored
architectural elevations to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for
their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on
the photographic prints.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
16. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
17. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the
Community Development Department - Planning Division for approval. These plans shall
conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "F", or as amended by these conditions. The
location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The
plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify
the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be
accompanied by the following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
18. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the
approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of
Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation
system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
R:~D P\00-0276 Keeton Trust~Staff report 276pa00.doc
12
19. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction
landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Community Development Department -
Planning Division for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the
landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the
Director of Planning, the bond shall be released.
20. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in are and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground,
or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-
street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, cleady and conspicuously stating
the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for
persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense,
Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000."
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3
square feet in size.
21. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing
and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage
courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
General Requirements
22. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site fiat work and
improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
23. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
24. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
25. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property.
R:\D P\00-0276 Keetor~ Trust~Staff report 276pa00.doc
13
26. The Developer shall post secudty and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
27. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
28. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
29. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
30. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental
Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property.
31. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
32. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
33. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation Distdct by either cashier's check or
money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
34. Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design cdtefia
shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
c. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through undersidewalk drains.
35. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
R:\D P\00-0276 Keeton Trust~Staff report 276pa00.doc
14
36.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
37. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
d. Rancho California Water District
e. Eastern Municipal Water District
f. Department of Public Works
38. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
39. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
41. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Fire Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the
Temecula Municipal Code.
42. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with
Palomar Lighting Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and
other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of
Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
43. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
44. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector pdor to commencement of
any construction or inspections.
45. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the buildings is required. The
path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross slope,
travel slope, stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled
Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998). Provide precise grading plan for plan check
submittal to check for handicap accessibility
46. All buildings shall complywith the applicable provisions of the California Disabled Access
Regulations effective April 1, 1998.
47. Provide the proper number of disabled parking spaces located as close as possible to the
main entries in accordance with California building Code Table 11B-6. Provide a site plan
as requested above which indicates compliance with this.
R:\D P\00-0276 Keeton Trust\Staff repo~ 276pa00.doc
15
48.
49.
50.
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans and
structural calculations submitted for plan review.
Provide electrical plan including Icad calculations and panel schedule for plan review.
Provide house-electrical meters at each building for the purpose of providing power for fire
alarm systems and exterior lighting.
51. Schematic plumbing plans, electrical plan and Icad calculations, along with mechanical
equipment and ducting plans shall be submitted for plan review stamped and odginal signed
by an appropriate registered professional.
52. Obtain street addresses from the Building Official prior to submittal of plans for plan review.
53. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrant to the project that indicates the hours
of construction, shown below, as allowed by City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04,
specifically Section G (1) of Riverside county Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-
quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m.- 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
54. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
55. Restroom fixtures, number and type shall be in accordance with the provisions of the
1998 edition of the California Building Code, Appendix Chapter 29.
Provide an approved precise grading plan for plan check submittal for checking of site disabled
accessibility.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions
regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
40. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
41. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at
20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 400 GPM for a
total fire flow of 1900 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automaticfire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given
above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
42. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6" x
4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public
streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located
no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s)
frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s)
R:\D P\00-0276 Keeton Trust\Staff report 276pa00.doc
16
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2,903.4.2,
and Appendix Ill-B)
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (
CFC sec 902)
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
The gradient for a fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. (CFC
902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14)
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After
the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be
installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building
materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire
Protection Association 24 1-4.1 )
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a
contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial
buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum
of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or
numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family
residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire
Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval pdor to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10)
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4)
Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
R:'tD P\00-0276 Keeton Trust\Staff report 276pa00.doc
17
OTHER AGENCIES
53. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water District's transmittal dated July 28, 2000, a copy of which is attached.
54. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside
Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated August 1,2000, a copy of which is
attached.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Name printed
R:\D P\00-0276 Keeton Trust\Staff report 276pa00.doc
18
ATrACHMENT NO. 2
Keeton Letter Dated December 1, 2000
R:~D P\00-0276 Kee~n Trust\Staff report 276pa00.doc
19
December 11, 2000
DEC :1 2 Z000
By
Mr. Thomas Thornsley-Project Planner
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
(909)694-6400
Re:
Proposed Corporate Office Building for:
Keeton Construction Co., Inc.
Markham & Associates
Alhambra Group
Enterprise Circle North
Temecula, California
Reference No. PA00-0125
Dear Mr. Thornsley:
In response to your request for an explanation why our project should be accepted, as it
relates to the City Development Code Section No. 17.08.050 paragraph A. "Commercial
/ Office / Industrial, incentives - increases in the floor area ratio; we offer the following:
Traffic within the city .would be less. Our facility will serve as Corporate Headquarters for
three prominent businesses presently located throughout Temecula, who share a
common client base involved in the Building and Development Industry, therefore we'll
create a "one stop shop," and less traffic. Also note that the utilities serving the area will
not be overburdened.
There are several elements and features of our project, which meet the requirements, for
approval set forth in paragraph "A"; reference Item Number:
Our project includes uses which provide outstanding and exceptional benefits to
the City with respect to employment, fiscal and economic needs of the
community such as'
The dynamics of our team, Keeton Construction Company, Markham &
Associates and the Alhambra Group being under one roof will enhance our
abilities to bring Industry and Commerce to The City of Temecula. The city
will benefit in revenues, while our citizens benefit through the addition of local
jobs. An example of Keeton Construction's contribution to this end is the key
role we've played in bdnging the Scotts Company to the city of Temecula.
They're soon to be one of our top employers.
43280 Business Park Drive
Suite 201
Temecula, California 92590
909.694.0700
909.694.0703 Fax
'wwwkee~onconstrucuoncom
Our project provides exceptional architectural and landscape design amenities
which reflect an attractive image and character for the city such as:
· The construction of the building is entirely of steel, to allow the majority of the
building to be glazed.
The massing of the building is arranged such that the facade is staggered;
the second floor projects out over the first floor creating a deep recessed
entry, shade lines and protection from the sun and rain. The building's
elements are of varying heights, and accentuates its visual interest.
The Proposed materials on the exterior of the building are significantly nicer
than typical painted concrete or stucco. We are recommending natural
sandstone cladding for the wainscot and walls at each side of the entdes, a
high quality window system with deep blue tinting, and large, carefully
proportioned painted cornices at all roofs and parapets.
· Lighting, to accentuate the building, is proposed in soffit lights and sconces,
on all elevations.
Small features, such as decorative accent tiles, are proposed along the
perimeter of the colonnades, to provide visual interest on the one portion of
the building, which is stuccoed.
· Our landscape plan shows a 25% coverage.of our site and a greatly
enhanced quality of product and design. Vince DJ. Dinato, the President of
· the Alhambra Group is Temecula Valley's leading Landscape Architect and
assures us that our landscaping will be superb,
As a point of summary, this building has been designed to be of very high,
Class A office quality. Its visual interest and richness are of primary
importance to its owners and occupants. We believe that the project, as
proposed, would be a true asset to the immediate area, and to the City of
Temecula.
Should you need anything else from us please don't hesitate to contact us at anytime.
Sincerely,
Bruce G. Keeton
President
Cc: Debbie Ubnoske
Larry Markham
Enclosure
43280 Business Park Drive
Suite 201
Temecula, California 92590
909.694.0700
909.694.0703 Fax
wwwkeetonconstruction.com
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
EXHIBITS
R:\D P\00-0276 Keeton Trust~Staff Feport 276pa00.doc
20
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0276 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - December 20, 2000
VICINITY MAP
R:\D P\00-0276 Keeton Trust\Staff report 276pa00.doc
21
CITY OF TEMECULA
PROJECT SITE
EXHIBIT B
DESIGNATION - BP (Business Park)
ZONING MAP
PROJECT SITE
EXHIBIT C
DESIGNATION - BP (Business Park)
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0276 (Development Plan)
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - December 20, 2000
GENERAL PLAN
R:\D P\00-0276 Keeton Trust~Sb~ff report 276pa00.doc
22
CITY OF TEMECULA
'--... k C.,¥' ~.
~ ~ t ?e ~ ~ ' ' .... ' ...... ' ~ ~ ~[~ .......... '
[~ ~F X.~ PR[PARED B~'
P~NNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0276 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT D SITE PLAN
P~NNING COMMISSION DATE - December 20, 2000
R:\D P\00-0276 Keeton Trust~Staff report 276pa00,doc
23
CITY OFTEMECULA
FRONT ELEVATION ~,~. ~,,a~,~.
! IIII I
' ,'~'11 - II
REAR ELEVATION
SIDE ELEVATION
SIDE ELEVATION
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0276 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT E
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - December 20, 2000
ELEVATIONS
R:\D P\00-0276 Keeton Trust\Staff report 276pa00.doc
24
CITY OFTEMECULA
~CRC3.ENORTH
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0276 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT F
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - December 20, 2000
LANDSCAPE PLAN
R:\D P\00-0276 Keeton Trust\Staff report 276pa00.doc
25
ITEM #5
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
December 20, 2000
Planning Application No. 00-0332(Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan)
Prepared by: Rolfe Preisendanz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff
recommends the Planning Commission:
1. ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-._
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-
0332 A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO
DESIGN, CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A 16,726 SQUARE FOOT
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS ON 6.2
VACANT ACRES WITHIN PLANNING AREA 2 OF THE CAMPOS
VERDES SPECIFIC PLAN ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF NORTH
GENERAL KEARNY ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS
PARCEL NO. 921-090-079
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Kent Cornwall / Cornwall Associates
REPRESENTATIVE:
Kent Cornwall
PROPOSAL:
To design, construct and operate a 16,726 square foot church on 5.2
acres of vacant land within Planning Area 2 of the Campos Verdes
Specific Plan.
LOCATION:
South side of North General Kearny Road approximately 720 feet
east of the Margarita Road/North General Kearny Road intersection.
EXISTING ZONING:
Campos Verdes Specific Plan, Planning Area 2, (Commercial / Office
/ Church / Detention Basin)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North: Campos Verdes Specific Plan, Planning Area 3 (Low Medium
Residential Density) and Planning Area 7 (Middle School)
South: Campos Verdes Specific Plan, Planning Area 2 (Detention
Basin)
East: Campos Verdes Specific Plan, Planning Area 1 (Park)
West: Campos Verdes Specific Plan, Planning Area 2,
(Commercial/Office/Church/Detention Basin)
R:',D P~00-0332 LDS Church~Staff Report.doc
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION: Professional Office (PO) / Open Space
EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND
USES:
North: Single Family Residences
South: Detention Basin
East: Park
West: Vacant
PROJECT STATISTICS (DEVELOPMENT PLAN)
Lot Area:
231,200 square feet (5.20 acres)
Building Area:
16,726 square feet
Building Height: 57 feet (28 feet to roof top of building plus an additional 29 foot steeple)
Landscaped Area: 139,960 square feet (38.6%)
Parking Required: 102 vehicular, 5 handicapped, 5 bicycle, 5 motorcycle
Parking Provided: 189 vehicular, 6 handicap, 10 bicycle, 5 motorcycle
Lot Coverage: 7%
Floor Area Ratio: 0.07
BACKGROUND
This project has been in process for approximately seven months. The applicant presented the
project to staff as a pre-application on April 13, 2000. On June 12, 2000 the applicant was provided
preliminary comments regarding the proposed project. A formal application was submitted to the
Planning Department on August 22, 2000. The first of two Development Review Committee (DRC)
meetings was held on September 21, 2000. The DRC meeting prompted many comments, which
were detailed for the applicant in a letter dated October 3, 2000. The letter dated October 3, 2000
also deemed the project incomplete. The applicant revised the site plan to comply with the
comments provided by staff and resubmitted again on October 16, 2000. The project was deemed
complete on November 8, 2000.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project is a proposal for a 16,726 square foot facility for the Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter
Day Saints. The local members called a "Ward" will use the church for services. Generally a
"Ward" consists of 100 families of which about half are active in church participation. Sunday
services will begin at 9:00 A.M. and generally last three hours, followed by a couple of hours of
concentrated religious instruction. The religious instruction will create a need for up to 20 various
sized teaching rooms. Weekday usage is limited to evenings from the hours of about 6:30 P.M. to
9:30 P.M., for youth groups, scouting, women's organizations, and recreational activities. Local high
school age members will, at times, use the building on school days in the early morning hours
before school. Occasionally Friday evening activities, Saturday activities, and various recreational
events will make use of the facilities. The facility will not be used for day care or as an educational
institution.
R:~D P\00-0332 LDS ChurchgStaff Report,doc
2
ANALYSIS
Site Desi,qn
The project is located on the south side of North General Kearny Road, approximately 400 feet east
ofthe intersection of the North General Kearny and Margarita Road. One (1) driveway located at
the northeast corner of the site will provide access to the site from North General Kearny Road.
Parking for the project is located on the east, west, and south side of the property, with the
entrances to the church building being oriented towards the west and east.
The Campos Verdes Specific Plan identifies a target floor area ratio of 0.40 for development within
the Commercial/Office (CO) designation. The floor area ratio (FAR) for the project is 0.07. The
Campos Verdes Specific Plan allows maximum lot coverage of 30% in the Commercial Office (CO)
designation. The lot coverage for this project has been calculated to be 7%.
Access, Traffic and Circulation
Access for the site will be taken from North General Kearny Road. Parking is provided along the
easterly, westerly, and southerly sides of the site. Nearly twice the amount of required parking is
being provided. The Public Works Department has reviewed traffic impacts associated with this
project and has indicated that the impacts of the project will not be significant. Emergency vehicles
are able to access the site to provide the appropriate fire and life safety services.
Architecture, Color and Materials
The design and detailing of the building's architecture is in keeping with current neo-traditional
design. The variations in roof design throughout the project provide visual interest to the project due
to the multitude of angles provided. Additionally, the eave lines are Iow which will complement the
design elements of the surrounding residential environment.
The exterior of the building is primarily new brick, augmented with the use of wood-painted window
sashes, doors, cornices, and fascia. The applicant is proposing the use of three different colors of
clay roof tiles: burnt sienna, brick red, and imperial peach.
The applicant is proposing a 28-foot building to the highest point of the roof, topped with steeple that
is 29-feet in height, with an overall height at the steeple of 57 feet. Although, the Campos Verdes
Specific Plan limits the height of buildings within Planning area 2 to 50 feet, the City of Temecula's
Development Code provides additional definition of building height:
The vertical distance by which a building extends above the pre existing grade,
finished grade or floor protection elevation, which ever is lower, to the highest point
of the coping ora fiat roof, or to the deck line ora mansard roof or to the average
point of the highest and lowest points of a gab/e, hip or gambrel roof. Screened
mechanical and electrical towers, chimneys, and other integral parts of the
building or structure occupying no more than five percent of the roof area
shall be excluded from the measurement.
The proposed 42 square foot steeple occupies less than 5 percent of the roof area. Therefore the
steeple, an integral part of the building, can be excluded from the building height measurement.
The Planning Commission has also allowed these architectural elements in the past for other
religious institutions.
R:~D P~00-0332 LDS ChurchgStaff Report.doc
3
Si.qna.qe
Signage is not a part of this application. The review of signage will be conducted under a separate
application at a later time
Landscapin,q
The Campos Verdes Specific Plan requires projects within the Commercial/Office (CO) designation
to provide minimum landscaping and open space areas of 15%. The amount of landscape
materials proposed by the applicant is 136,960 square feet, which is 59% lot coverage, including the
drainage channel. The amount of landscaping proposed by the applicant excluding the drainage
channel is 68,120 square feet or 42%, which exceeds what the Specific Plan requires. Within the
Landscape Development Zone or LDZ along North General Kearny Road, which is 32 feet from the
face of curb, the applicant has provided a meandering sidewalk, and landscaping. These
improvements are consistent with Figure IV~7 of the Campos Verdes Specific Plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was approved for the Campos Verdes Specific Plan.
According to the CEQA Guidelines, Section 15162, no subsequent EIR's are required when an EIR
has been adopted if the following conditions do not exist:
Substantial changes are proposed in the project, which will require major revisions of the
previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or substantial
increase in the severity of previously identified significant effect.
The applicant is proposing a use that is designated by the Campos Verdes Specific Plan
to be acceptable for this Planning Area. During the preparation of the EIR, the potential
impacts of this use were reviewed. The applicant is not proposing to increase the
severity of the use and therefore no significant adverse impacts are anticipated which
would warrant a revised EIR.
Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is
undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to involvement of new
significant effects or substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant
impacts.
The circumstances that existed at the time of EIR preparation have not changed
significantly. The development that has occurred in the vicinity of the project is
consistent with the Campos Verdes Specific Plan as well as the Development Code and
the General Plan.
New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been
known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was adopted, is
present.
The project has no significant effects that weren't discussed in the previous EIR. No new
mitigation measures are proposed for the project.
Based on the previous discussion, it has been found that the project will require no further
environmental review pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines.
R:~D P~00-0332 LOS Church\Staff Report.doc
4
EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
The General Plan Land Use designation for the site is Professional Office/Open Space. Existing
zoning for the site is the Campos Verdes Specific Plan No. 1, CO
(Commercial/OfficelChurchlDetention Basin). A variety of commemial uses, including chumh uses
are permitted or conditionally permitted within this zone, with the approval of a Development Plan
pursuant to Table II-B-1 (Scheduled Uses) of the Campos Verdes Specific Plan No. 1. The project
as proposed, meets all minimum standards of and is consistent with the General Plan, the Campos
Verdes Specific Plan, the Development Code, and the Design Guidelines.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The project has been determined by staff to be consistent with all-applicable City ordinances,
standards, guidelines, and policies. It is staff's opinion that the project is compatible with
surrounding developments in terms of design and quality.
FINDINGS
Conditional Use Permit
The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Campos Verdes
Specific Plan, as well as the applicable section of the Development Code.
Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds that the proposed Conditional Use
Permit/Development Plan is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan, the
Campos Verdes Specific Plan, the applicable sections of the Development Code, and
the Municipal Code.
The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition, and development of
adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely
affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. The applicant has proposed a project that
incorporates many of the design and landscape elements required by the Campos Verdes
Specific Plan.
The proposed Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan is to design, construct, and
operate a 16,726 square foot church within the CommerciallOfficelChurchlDetention
Basin (CO) designation of the Campos Verdes Specific Plan located on North General
Kearny Road. The Specific Plan allows for a church within this Planning Area,
therefore this use is consistent with the uses designated by the Specific Plan.
The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer area, landscaping and other
development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning
Commission or Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood.
Planning staff has reviewed the requirements of the performance standards
delineated in Specific Plan, as well as the applicable sections of the Development
Code. As a result, staff has determined that the proposed conditional use meets the
zoning requirements for the CO (CommerciallOfficelChurchlDetention Basin)
designation.
The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety, and
welfare of the community.
R:',D P\00-0332 LDS Church~Staff Report.doc
5
The project has been reviewed and commented on the by the Fire Safety Division and
the Building Safety Division. As a result, the project will be conditioned to address
any concerns had by these two (2) divisions. Further, provisions are made in the
General Plan and the Development Code to ensure that the public health, safety, and
welfare are safeguarded. The project is consistent with these documents.
The decision to conditionally approve the Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan is
based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning
Commission or City Council on appeal.
The project has been completely reviewed, as a whole, in reference to all applicable
codes and ordinances before the Planning Commission.
Development Plan
1,
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for (PO)
Professional Office development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the
development standards for (CO) Commercial/O~ce/Church/Detention Basin contained in
the Campos Verdes Specific Plan No. 1. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned
and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of commercial development
proposed. The project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirements
of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes.
The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other
associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and
safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as
conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines,
standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and
function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare.
Attachments-
PC Resolution - Blue Page 7
Exhibit A: Conditions of Approval for PA00-0332 (Conditional Use PermitJDevelopment Plan)
Blue Page 11
Exhibits for PA00-0332 (Conditional Use PermitJDevelopment Plan ) - Blue Page 25
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C. General Plan Map
D. Site Plan
E. Grading Plan
F. Elevations
G. Elevations
H. Floor Plan
I. Landscape Plans
R:~D P\00~0332 LDS Church~Staff Report.doc
6
A'I-I'ACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
APPROVING PA00-0332
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/DEVELOPMENT PLAN
R:~D P\00-0332 LDS Church~Staff Report.doc
7
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-020
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-
0332, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO
DESIGN, CONSTRUCT, AND OPERATE A 16,726 SQUARE FOOT
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS ON 6.2
VACANT ACRES WITHIN PLANNING AREA 2 OF THE CAMPOS
VERDES SPECIFIC PLAN ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF NORTH
GENERAL KEARNY ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR
PARCEL NO. 921-909-079.
WHEREAS, Kent Cornwall, Cornwall Associates representing The Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-Day Saints, filed Planning Application No. 00-0332, in a manner in accord with the City of
Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. 00-0332 was processed including, but not limited to a
public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning
Application No. 00-0332 on December 20, 2000, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by
law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in
support or in opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. 00-0332 subject to the conditions
after finding that the project proposed in Planning Application No. 00-0332 conformed to the City of
Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. Findin.qs. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No.
00-0332 (Conditional Use PermitJDevelopment Plan) hereby makes the following findings as
required by Section 17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan, the applicable
sections of the Development Code, and the Campos Verdes Specific Plan.
B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition, and
development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the proposed conditional use will not
adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures.
C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and
other development features prescribed in the Campos Verdes Specific Plan and required by the
Planning Commission or Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood.
D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety,
and general welfare of the community.
R:~) P~00-0332 LDS Church\Staff Report,doc
8
E. The decision to conditionally approve the application for a Conditional Use
PermitJDevelopment Plan is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before
the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal.
F. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for
(PO) Professional Office and (OS) Open Space development in the City of Temecula General Plan,
as well as the development standards for (CO) Commercial / Office/Church / Detention Basin
development contained in the Campos Verdes Specific Plan No. 1. The site is therefore properly
planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of commercial
development proposed. The project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable
requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes.
G. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and
other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and safety
of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for and as conditioned has
been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations
intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent
with the public health, safety and welfare.
Section 3, Environmental Compliance. An Environmental Impact Report has previously
been prepared and approved by the Planning Commission. Whereas the conditions under which
the Ell:{ were prepared have not changed substantially and the project is consistent with the
Campos Verdes Specific Plan and the Campos Verdes Specific Plan EIR, pursuant to Article 11,
Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, no further environmental
review if required for the proposed project.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves Planning Application No. 00-0332 (Conditional Use Permit/Development
Plan) request for a Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan to design, construct, and operate a
16,726 square foot church on 5.2 vacant acres within Planning Area 2 of the Campos Verdes
Specific Plan located on the south side of North General Kearny Road; 400 feet east of the
Margarita / North General Kearny Road intersection and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 921-909-
079, subject to the project specific conditions set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and
incorporated herein by this reference.
R:~D P~00-0332 LDS Church~Staff Report.doc
9
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 20th day of December 2000.
Ron Guerriero, Chairperson
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of December,
2000, by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:~D P~00-0332 LDS Church\Staff Report.doc
10
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PA00-0332 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
R:~D P~00-0332 LDS Church\Staff Report.doc
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No: PA00-0332 (Conditional Use Permi'dDevelopment Plan)
Project Description:
Request for a Conditional Use Permi'dDevelopment Plan
to design, construct, and operate a 16,726 square foot
church on 5.2 vacant acres within Planning Area 2 of the
Campos Verdes Specific Plan
DIF Category:
Potentially Exempt
Assessor's Parcel No: 921-020-079
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
December 20, 2000
December 20, 2002
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department- Planning Division a
cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of seventy-
eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice
of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California
Code of Regulations Section 15062. Ifwithin said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant
has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check
as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of
condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
General Requirements
The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency
or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all
claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary
damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof,
advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters
of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the
appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4
(Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167).
The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding
brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the
action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional
deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions
of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly
notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify,
defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its
R:~D P\00-0332 LDS Church\Staff Report.doc
12
officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit,
the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the applicant.
All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this
Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan.
This Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan may be revoked pursuant to Section
17.03.080 of the City's Development Code.
The Conditional Use Permit does not include the approval of a private day care or
educational institution. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or
revisions to the approval of this Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
R:~D P~00-0332 LDS Church~Staff Report.doc
13
EXHIBIT B
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL(DEVELOPMENT PLAN)
R:~D P\00~0332 LDS Church~Staff Report.doc
14
EXHIBIT B
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No: PA00-0332 (Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan)
Project Description:
Request for a Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan
to design, construct, and operate a 16,726 square foot
church on 6.2 vacant acres within Planning Area 2 of the
Campos Verdes Specific Plan
DIF Category:
Potentially Exempt
Assessor's Parcel No: 92t-020-079
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
December 20, 2000
December 20, 2002
DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department- Planning Division a
cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of seventy-
eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice
of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California
Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant
has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check
as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of
condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
General Requirements
The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency
or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and ail
claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary
damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof,
advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters
of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the
appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4
(Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167).
The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding
brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the
action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional
deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions
of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly
notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify,
defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its
R:~D P~00-0332 LDS Church~Staff Report.doc
15
10.
11.
12.
13.
officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit,
the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the applicant.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits D
(Site Plan), E (Grading Plan), F (Elevations), G (Elevations), H (Floor Plan), I (Landscape
Plans) and J (Color and Materials Board), contained on file with the Community
Development Department - Planning Division.
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed
below the lowest level of the surrounding parapet wall.
The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly
below and with Exhibit "J" (Color and Material Board), contained on file with the Community
Development Department - Planning Division.
Primary wall:
Gable Ends:
Steeple, Fascia, Gutters, Window Sash:
Roofing
Stone Arch Panel
Brick-Antique White
Stucco-Crystal White
"Kynar" Sheet Metal-Polar White
Flat Concrete Tile-Brown Blend
Marble Tile
14.
The consti'uction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities,
which are screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines.
.15.
Applicant will comply with the provisions of the adopted Campos Verdes Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program.
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
16.
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
17.
The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one signed
set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files.
18.
The applicant shall revise Exhibits "D, E, F, G, H, I and J', (Site Plan, Grading Plan,
Elevations, Floor Plan, Landscape Plan, and Color and Material Board) to reflect the final
conditions of approval that will be provided by the Community Development Department
Planning Division staff. The applicant shall submit five (5) full size copies, one (1) reduced
8.5"xl 1' copy of Exhibits D through H, two (2) 8" X '10" glossy photographic color prints of
R:~D P~00-0332 LDS Church~Staff Reporl.doc
16
approved Exhibit "r' (Color and Materials Board) and of the colored version of approved
Exhibit "F", the colored architectural elevations, to the Community Development Department
Planning Division for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations
shall be readable on the photographic prints.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
19.
20.
A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the
Community Development Department - Planning Division for approval. These plans shall
conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "1", or as amended by these conditions. The
location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The
plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify
the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be
accompanied by the following items:
Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of
submittal).
One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
An Administrative Development Plan application for signage shall be required for any
signage not included on Exhibits "D", "F" and "G", or as amended by these conditions. A
separate building permit shall be required for all signage identified on the approved Exhibits
"D", "F", and "G' or as amended by these conditions.
22.
All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the
approved construction landscape plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the
Planning Director. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The
irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
23.
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Director, to guarantee
the maintenance of the landscape plantings, in accordance with the approved construction
landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Community Development Department -
Planning Division for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the
landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the
Planning Director, the bond shall be released.
24.
The applicant must provide proof of exemption from taxes pursuant to Section 50(c)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986. If applicant fails to prOduce proof of non-profit organization
status, the Development Impact Fees associated with this project must be paid to the City of
Temecula.
25.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking sl~ace at a minimum
height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
R:~D P\00-0332 LDS Church~Staff Report.doc
17
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground,
or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-
street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating
the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for
persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense.
Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephonlng 909 696-3000."
26.
27.
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3
square feet in size.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
28. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all
existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints
and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for
further review and revision.
General Requirements
29. The applicant shall comply with the District's transmittal, dated September 15, 2000 a copy
of which is attached. The fee is made payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water
District by either a cashier's check or money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit
(unless deferred to a later date bythe District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan
fee.
30.
31.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County
Department of Environmental Health transmittal dated September 13, 2000 a copy of which
is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the California Historical
Resources Information System transmittal dated September 21, 2000 a copy of which is
attached.
32.
A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site fiat work and
improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
33.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
34.
All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent
projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on
standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
35.
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property.
R:'~D P~00-0332 LDS Church~Staff Report.doc
18
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
The Developer shall post secudty and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify
impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the
properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities,
including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required
improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation Distdct by either cashier's check or
money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
R:'~D P\00-0332 LDS Church\Staff Report.doc
19
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
46.
Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of
Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The following design criteria shall be observed:
a. Flow line grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through under sidewalk drains.
47.
All access rights, easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be submitted to and
approved by the Director of the Department of Public Works for dedication to the City where
sidewalks meander through private property.
48.
The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions,
49.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
50.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
51.
52.
c. Department of Public Works
All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
53.
All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Fire Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the
Temecula Municipal Code.
R:~D P\00-0332 LDS Church\Staff Report.doc
20
54. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with
Palomar Lighting Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and
other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of
Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
55. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
56. ^ pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to commencement of
any construction or inspections.
57. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the buildings is required. The
path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross slope,
travel slope, stripping, and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled
Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998). Provide precise grading plan for plan check
submittal to check for handicap accessibility
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
All buildings shall comply with the applicable provisions of the California Disabled Access
Regulations effective April 1, 1998.
Provide the proper number of disabled parking spaces located as close as possible to the
main entries in accordance with California building Code Table 11B-6. Provide a site plan
as requested above which indicates compliance with this.
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans and
structural calculations submitted for plan review.
Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule for plan review.
Provide house-electrical meters at each building for the purpose of providing power for fire
alarm systems and exterior lighting.
Schematic plumbing plans, electrical plan and load calculations, along with mechanical
equipment and ducting plans shall be submitted for plan review stamped and original signed
by an appropriate registered professional.
Obtain street addresses from the Building Official prior to submittal of plans for plan review.
Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrant to the project that indicates the hours
of construction, shown below, as allowed by City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04,
specifically Section G (1) of Riverside county Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-
quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday
6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday
7:00 a.m.- 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
Restroom fixtures, number, and type shall be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998
edition of the California Building Code, Appendix Chapter 29.
R:~D P~00-0332 LDS Church~Staff Repod.doc
21
69. Provide an approved precise grading plan for plan check submittal for checking of site-
disabled accessibility.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
70.
The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions
regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
71.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Fire Prevention Bureau
reviews building plans. These conditions will be based on occupancy; use, the California
Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes, which are in force at
the time of building, plan submittal.
72.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at
20-PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 400 GPM for a
total fire flow of 1900 GPM with a 2-hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given
above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
73.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6" x
4"x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public
streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart and shall be located no more than 250
feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access read(s) frontage to a hydrant.
The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The
upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2,903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
74.
As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the building(s) is in excess of
150 feet from a water supply on a public street, on site fire hydrants are required. For this
project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
75.
Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-
de-sac shall be forty-five (45) feet. (CFC 902.2.2.2.3 and Ord. 460)
76.
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
77.
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 lbs. GVVV. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
78.
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet.
(CFC sec 902)
79.
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
R:~D P\00-0332 LDS Church~Staff Report.doc
22
80.
Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet, which have not been completed, shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
81.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be:
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After
the local water company signs the plans, the originals shall be presented to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be
installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building
materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire
Protection Association 24 1-4.1 )
82.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
83.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, all commercial buildings
shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the building. The
numerals shall be minimum twelve (12) inches in height for buildings and six (6) inches for
suite identification on a contrasting background. In strip centers, businesses shall post the
suite address on the rear door(s). (CFC 901.4.4)
84.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy, or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
85.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10)
86.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
to the right side of the main entrance door. The Knox-Box shall be supervised by the alarm
system. (CFC 902.4)
87.
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
OTHER AGENCIES
88.
89.
90.
91.
Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control
letter dated September 15,2000.
The applicant shall comply with the conditions set forth in the letter from the Department of
the Army Nationwide Permit Authorization dated March 1, 2000.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the letter from the United
States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service dated September 20,2000.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations as set forth in the letter from the
Department of Transportation dated September 18, 2000.
R:~D P~00-0332 LDS Church\Staff Report.doc
23
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand, and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant Name
R:~D P~00-0332 LDS Church~Staff Report.doc
24
DAVID P. ZAPPE
C~, n¢£al Manager-Chief Engineer
, ~51180:1
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONY
AND WATER CONSERVATION DIST TSEp
City of Temecu!a
Planning Department
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033 . _
Attention:
Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: PA O0 - 0332.? 0.333
The Distdct does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated
cities. The Distdct also does not plan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or
other flood hazard reports for such cases, Distnct comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited
to items of specific ~ntarest to the Distdct including D sthct Master Drainage Plan fac t es, other re_qional flood
control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical componenfor extens on of a master plan system,
and Distdct Area Drainage P an fees (development mitigation fees) In addition, information of a general nature is
provided. '
The .D.!s!rict h,as n, ot.[.ev, iew. ed the proposed,project in de~il and the following checked comments do not in any way
censmute or imply ulsthct approval or enaorsement of tne proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public
health and sarety or any other such issue:
~ This PrDject would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of
regional interest proposed.
This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The Distdct will accept ownership of such facilities on
written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to D strict standards, and District plan check and
insp.ectipn will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be
requlreo.
This p,roject proposes channels, s, torm drains, 36 inches or arger, n diameter, or other facilities that cou d be
consloered regional in nature an~vor a Iogica~ extens on of the aoopted
M.a.,ster..D..rain_age.,.P..lan. The District would cons der accepting ownemhip of such tac~lit~es on wntten request
or me Oty. racmties must be constructed to D strict standards, and D~stdct plan check and inspection will
be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be requirC~cl..
V"' This project is located within the limits of the District's ~UP,,R.t~I'gl CR.E.,c~/'?',¢'M£CDL.P~ V'A,~r~a~
_D~ra_i_n,_age Plan for ,which ,dre. ina, ge fe. es ,ha_ve ,been_ a,doptecl; applicable t~s si~ol~la be pa a by cashier's
cnec~ or money oroer omy to me ~-Iooo ~Jon[ro~ uisthct prior to issuance of bui~d!qg or grading permits,
whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of[he actual
permit.
GENERAL INFORMATION
This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water
Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given until the
City has determined that *,he project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt.
If this project involves a Federal EmergenFy Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, then the City should
require the applicant to provide all studies cacuations, plans and other ~nformaton re_quired to meet FEMA
requirements and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR)
pdor to grad ng, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to
occupancy.
If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to
obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water ACt
Se,.ction 404 Permit. from the U.S. Army Corps of Eng neers, o.r written correspondence from these agencies
ineiceting the prqject is exempt from these reqmrements. A Clean water Act Section 401 Water Qua ty Cert~cetion
may be required from the local California Regional Water Qua ty Contro Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404
permit.
1995 MARKET STREE?
RIVERSIDE, CA 9250~
909/955-1200
909/788-9965 FAX
Very truly yours,
STUART fi. MCKIBBIN
Senior Civil Engineer
Date: (~ ---~'
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY"
LOS ~ELES DISTRI~ CORP~ OF ENG~E~S · ' ~ ~ ~.~ ..
LOS ANGEL~, CALIFORNIA 9~63-23~ '
Ma~ 1, 2000 : _
Otfice ot the Chief
Regulatory Brancix
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NATIONWIDE PERMIT AUTI.-IORIZA. TION
Michael A. Tylma~
Robert Be[n, Wilham Frost & Associates
27555 Ynez Road Suite 400
TemeCuia, Califorrda 92591-4679
Dear .M.r, Tyknan:
This is in reply to.your letter (No. 199915723-YIC) dated April 30, 1999, concerning our
permit au~ority under Section 404 ot the Clean Water Act of ~.972 (3,3 U.S.C. 15~4) over your
proposal on behalf of Woods~de Homes to regrade the streambed anti place rock tiptop bx Long
Canyon Creek in Temecule, Riverside County, California.
The Corps of ErtgineerS has detemxined that your proposed activity complies with the
terms and condition~ of natiorxwide permit NW26 [Federal Register, December 13, 1996, pp.
65874-659221 for discharges of dredge~ or fill material into headwaters and isolated waters
provided that the activity meets all of the following criteria in the permit terms anti conditions
(Enclosure). For the purposes of t. kis NWP, tho acreage of loss of waters of the United States
includes He filled area plus waters of the United States that are adversely affected by flooding,
excavation or dreinnge as a result of the project. The 3 acre and 1/3 acre limits of NW 26 are
absolute, and cannot be inc.~eased by any mitiga~on plan offered by the applicant or required
by the District Engineer. Whenever any other NWP is used in conjunc~on with this NWP, the
total acreage of impacts to waters of the United States of all NWPs combined, can not exceed 3
~CTeS.
As long as you comply with the attached nationwide permit temps and conciitions, an
individual permit [s not reqt~ired. Th~ letter of verification is valid for a peeipd not to exceed two
years ~mless the nationwide perm.it [s modred, reissued, revoked, or expires before fi.at time.
Presently, all nationwide perrrd, t~ are scheduled to expire an February 11, 2002 except nationwide
permit Nhq 26 which is cu~ently ~chedttled to expire on April 14, 2000, or the effective date of the
new and modified NWPs, wlxichever occurs first. It is incumbent upon you to remain L, fformed of
changes to the nationwide permits. We will L~ue a public notice armouncing the changes when
. they occur. Furthermore, Lf you con'a~etxce Or are under contract to coro. mence this ac~vity before
ff~e date the nationwide pem-dt is modified or revoked, you will have twelve montl~ from the
date of the modification or revocation to complete the activity under the present terms and
conditions of the natior~wide permit. Furthermore, yon must comply with the attached Special
Conditions.
A nationwide permit does not grant any property rights or exclusive privileges. Also,
it does not authorize'any injury to the property or rights of other~ or authorize interference with
any existing or proposed Federal proiect. F~-thermore, it does not obviate the need to obtain
other I~ederal, state, or local authorizations recluked by lav~.
Thai~k you for participating in our regulatory pro, am. If you have any .questions, please
contact Jae Chung of my staff at (213) 452-3292.
Sincerely, ~
Mark D~rham
Chief, South Co,~t Section
Re~latory Branch
~.ndosure
Special Conditions for 199915723o¥JL2.
The permittee shall employ ali standard Best Management Practices to ensure ti'mt toxic
materials, silt, debris, or excessive erosion d_,o aot enter the Long Canyo~ Creek during
project construction.
The permittee shall ensure that ail vel~cle maintenance, staging, storage, and cti~pensing
of h~el occurs in designated ul~land ~re~s. The permittee shall ensure that these
designated upland areas are located in ~ud~ a manner as to prevent any runoff from
entering waters of t-he U.S.
The permitme shall plant Or hydro,seed the 4H:IV side slopes with native vegetaEon.
Should the permittee also plant or hydroseed flae streambed, native specie~ shall also be
used.
LOS ANGELES DISTPdCT
U.S. AP. MY CORPS OF F. NGINEER$
CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NATIONWIDE PERMIT
Permit Number:
Name of Permittee:
Date of Issuance:
199915723-~C
WoodsideHomes
March l, 2000
Upon completion of the activi .ty authorized by this pe~nwit and any mitigation requited by
the perrmt, sign this certification and return it to the following adc~tes~:
U.$ Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Branch
ATTN: CESPL-CO-1Z~199915723-Y]C
?.O BOX 532711
Los Angeles, CA 90053-2325
Please note that yotzr permitted activity is st;bject to.a comp "liance inspection by an Army
Corps of Eng4neers representative. If yotl fail to comply with this nationwide pem'~t you may be
subject to permit sttspension, modification, or revocation procedures as contained in 33 CFR330.5
or etfforcement procedures such as those contained in 33 CFR 326.4 and 326.5.
I hereby certify flxat the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been
completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the said permit, and required
mitigation was completed in accordance with the permit condition(~).
Signature of Perrttittee
Date
NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBER NW26 TEILMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Nationwide Pexmlt N~V26 Terms:
Your activity is authorized under N~,z26 subiect to the t~ollowin§ terms:
Na~ot-~wide Number 26: HeadwaterS and Isolated Waters Discharzes, l~scharges of dredged or fill material
into headwaters and isolated waters provided that the activity mee-ts all of the following criteria:
a. The discharge does not cause the loss of more than 3 acres of waters of the United States nor cause
the loss of waters of the United States for a distance greater than 500 linear feet of the s~eam bed;
b. For discharges causing tixe loss of greater than 1/3 acre of waters of the United States, the perraittee
notifies the District E~gineer in accordance with th~ "Notification" general condition;
c, For discharges causing a loss of 1/3 acre or less of waters of the United States the permittee must
submit a report within 30 days of completion of the work, contain, ing the ixfformation listed below;
d. For discharges in special aquatic sites, including wetlands, the notification must aiso include a
delineation of affected special aquatic sites, inciadmg wetlands (Also see 33 CFR 330.1(e)); and
e. The discharge, including all attendan~ feaW-res, both temporary and permanent, is part of a single
and complete project. Note, th.is NWP will expire on September 15, 1999.
For the purposeS of tl~is NWP, the acreage of loss of waters of the United States includes the filled area plus
waterS of the Un,ted States t.hat are adversely affected by flooding, excavation or drainage as a result of the
project. The 3 acre and 1 /3 acre limits of N'WP 26 are absolute, and cannot be increased by any mitigation plan
offered by tlxe applicant or required by t. he Dis~ct Engineer. Wlxenever any other N'WP is used in conjunction
with this NWP, the total acreage of impacts to waters of the Ur, ired States of all NWPs combined cannot
exceed 3 acres.
Subdivisions: For any real estate subdiv~on created or subdivided after O~tober 5, 1984, a notification
pursuant to subsection Co) of this N'WP is required for any discharge which would cause the aggregate total
loss of waters of the United States for the entire subdivision to exceed 1/3 acre. Any d~scharge in any real
estate subdivision which would cause the aggregate tote! loss of waterS of the United States i.n the subdivision
to exceed 3 acres is r~ot autho'tized by this NWP; unless the District Engineer exempts a particular subdivision
or parcel by making a written determination that: (1) the individual and cumulative adverse environmental
effects would be ~al and the property owner had, a~ter October 5, 1984, but prior to February 1~., ~.997,
committed substantial resources in rel~ance or~ 1NrWP 26 with regard to a subdivision, i~ circumstances where
it would be inequitable to frustrate the property owner s investment-backed expectations, or (2) that the
individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects would be minimal, high quality wetlands would ~ot
be adversely affected, and there Would be an overall benefit to the aquatic environment. Once the exemption
is established ~or a subdivision, ~ubseoue~t lot development by individual property owners may proceed
using NWP 26. For purposes of NWP ~6, the term "real estate subdivLsmn" shall be interpreted to include
ciro. u'~tanceS where a landowner or developer divides a tract of land into smaller parcels for the puxpose of
selling, conveying, transferring, leasing, or developing said parcels. This would include the entire area of a
residential, commercial or other real estate subdivision, L-~ctud~g all parcels and parts thereof.
~eport: For discl~arges ca'aaing tb.e loss of 1/3 act9 or less of waters of ti'~e United States the perraJttee faust
submit a report within 30 days o,* completion of the work, contaLning the following infcrmatic>n:
a. Name, address, and telephotxe nm,'nber of the
b. Location of the work;
c. Description of the work; and,
cl. Type and. acreage (or square feet) of the loss of waterco, the Umted St res (e.g., 1/10 acre of marsh
ancl 50 square feel et a stream.) (Section 404)
2. Nationwide Permit General Conditions
A. The following general condition~ must 1:~ followed in order for any authorization by a NWP to be valid:
1. Navigation. No activity n~y cause more than a minimal adverse effect on navigation.
2. Proper maintenance. Any structure or fill authorized shall be properly maimained, including
maintenance to ensm¢ public safety.
3. Erosion and siltation controls. Appropriat~ erosion and siltation controls mu~t be used and maintained
in effective operating condition during const~ctioa, and all exposed soil and other fills, as well as any.
work below the ordinary high water mark er high tide line, must b~ permanemly stabilized at the earliest
practicable date.
4. Aquatic life movements. No activity ma;/substantially disrt~pt the movement of those species of
aquatic life indigenous t,o the waterbody, including those species which normally migrate tl~reugh the
area, unless the activity s primary purpose is to impoai~d 'water.
5. Equipment. Heavy equipment working ia wetlands must be placed on mats, or other measures must be
taken to minimize soil disturbance.
6, Regional and case-by-case conditions. The activity must comply with any regional conditions which
may have been added by the Division Engineer (see 33 CFR 330,4(e)) and with any cane specific
conditions added by the Corps or by the state or tribe in its section 401 water quality certification.
Regional Special Conditions are listed in Section 3 of this Permit.
7. Wild and Scenic Rivers. No activity may occur in a component of the National Wild and Scenic Rive~
System; or in a river officially designated by Congress as a "study riwr" for possible inclusion in the
system, while the.river is in an official study stall, s, unless the appropriate Federal agency with direct
management responsibility for'such river has determined in writing that the proposed activity will not
adversely effect the Wild and Scenic River designation, or study stfitus. Information on Wild and Scenic
Rivers may be o~ainea from the appropriate Federal land management agency in the area (e.g., National
Park So.ice, U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.)
8. Tribal tights. No activity or its operation may impair reaerved tribal rights, in,luding, bat not limited
to. reserved water rights and treaty fishing and hunting rights.
9. Water qnality certification. Ir, certain states, an individual Section 401 wMet quality certification must
b~ obtained or waived (see 33 CFR 330.4(c)),
! O. Coastal zone management, in ce-train states, an individua! state coastal zone management consistenc~,,
concurrence must be obtained or waived (see Section
Endangered Specie~:
a. No activity is authorized under any NWP which is likely to jaopaxdize the continued existence
of a ;ka'eatened or endangered species or a species proposed for such designation, as identified
under the Federal Endangered Species Act, or which is likely to destroy or adversely modify the
critical habitat of such specie~. Non-fade;al permittees shall notify the District Eagineer if any
listed species or critical habitat might be affected or is in the vicinity of the project, and shall not
begin work on ate activity until notified by the District Engineer that the requirements of the
Endangered Species Act have been sati.~fied and that the activity is authorized.
b. Authorization of an activity by a nationwide permit does not authorize the take of a threatened
or endangered species as defined under the Federal Endangered Species Act. In the absence of
sops;me authorization (e.g., an ESA Section 10 Pemfit, a Biological Opinion v, ith incidental take
provisions, etc.) from the U.S. Fi:h and Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries
Service, both lethal and non-lethal takes of protected species are in violation of the Endangered
Species Act. Information on ;he location of threatened and endangered species and their critical
habitat can be obtained directly from the offices of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
National Marine Fisheries Service or their World Wide Web pages at:
http://www.fws,govt-r~endspplandspp.html
and
http://gingfish.spp.mnfs.gov/tmcintyr/prot_res.html#ES and Recovery
12. Historic properties. No activity which may affect historic properties listed', or eligible for listing, in
the National Register of Historic Places is authorized, until the DE has complied with the provisions of
33 CFR PaR 325, Appendix C. The ptnspactive pe.-'minee must n~tify the District Engineer if the
authorized activity may affect any historic properties listed, determined to be eligible for listing, or
which the prospective permittee has reason to believe may be eligible f~r listing on the National Register
of Historic Places, and shall not begin the activity until notified by the District Engineer that the
requirements of the National Historic Preservation Ac~ have been satisfied and that the activity is
authorized. Information on the location and existence of historic resources can be obtained from the State
Historic Preservation Office and the National Register of Historic Plac~i (see 33 CFR 330.4(g)).
13. Notification. Not applicable.
· 14. Compliance certification. Every pe~mittee who has received a nationwide permit verification front
the Corps will submit a signed certificatioa regarding the completed work and any required rmtigation.
The certification will be forwarded by the Co~s with the authorization letter and will include:
i, A statement that the au;hori~ad work was done in accordance with the Corps authorization,
including any general or specific conditions;
Ii, A statement that any required mitigation was completed in accordance with the permit
conditi6ng:
iii. The signature of the permittee certifying the. c~mplelion.0f the work and mitigation.
15. Multiple use of Nationwide permits. In any case where any NWP number 12 through 40 is combined
with any other Ii'WP numher 12 tltrough 40, as pan of a single and complete project, the permittee must
notify the District Engineer in accordance with paragraphs a, b, and c on the Notification General
Condition number 1.3 Any NWP number 1 through 11 may be combined with any other l'~rP without
notification to the Corps, unless notification ia otherwise required by the terms of the NWPs. As
provided at 33 CFR 330.6, two or more different NWPs eau be- combined to authorize a single and
complete project. However, the same NWP eanao: be used more than once for a single and complete
project.
B. SECTION 404 oNLY CONDITIONS; In addition to the General Conditions, the following conditions apply
only to activities that involve the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S., and must be
followed itt order for authofizatitm by the NWPs to be valid:
1. Water supply intakes. No discharge of dretiged or fill material may occur in the proximity cf a public
water supp]5 intake except where the discharge is for repair of the public water supply intake structures
or adjacent bank stabilization.
2. Shellfish production. No discharge of dredged or fill material may occur in areas of concemrated
shellfish production, unless the discharge is directly related to a shellfish harvesting activity authorized
by iN'qqP 4.
3. Suitable material. No discharge of dredged ox fill material may consist of unsuitable mater/al (e.g.,
trash, debris, car bodies, asphalt, ~tc.,) and material discharged must be free from toxic pollutants in
toxic amounts (see Section 303 of the Clear, Water Act).
4. Mitigation. Discharges of dredged or fill ntateriai into waters of the United States must be minimized
or avoided to the maximum extent practicable at the project site (i.e., on-site), unless the District
Engineer approves a compensation plan that ;he District Engineer determines is more beneficial to the
environment than on-site minimization or avoidance measures.
5, Spawning areas. Discharges in spawning areas during spawning seasons must b~ avoided to the
maximum extent practicable.
6. Obstruction of high flows. To the ma~,imum ext~nt practicable, discharges must not permanently
restrict or impede the passage of normal or eapected high flows or cause the relocation of the water
(nnless the primary purpose of the fill is to impound waters).
7. Adverse effects from impoundments. If the discharge creates an impoundment of water, adverse
effects on the aquatic system caused by the accelerated passage of water and/or the restriction of its flow
shall be minimized to the 'maximum extent practicable.
8. Waterfowl breeding areas. Discharges into breeding areas for migratory waterfowl must be avoided to
the maximum extent practicable- ' ' "
9. Removal of temporary fils. Any temporary fills must be removed in their entirety and the affected
areas returned to their preexisting elevation.
3, R~gional Conditions for Nationwide Permits:
Reeit~nnl General Condition ~el - Vernal Pool Not~:
Regional General Condition #1 requires notification to be provided to the District Enginee~ in accordance with
~he "Notification" general condil~on (30 day p[e-Const~ction Noti~ca~[on) for any d~charge of dredged or fill material,
~eavation, or mechanized tandclearing in any wmal pool. This regional gen~al condition applies to all nationwide
~im and l~ all valid ~egional g~aerai pe~its ~n the pomian of ~c Los Angeles Distrtet that is within the s~at~ of
CalifOrnia, Figure 1 shows the distribution of many of Ibc lmowa ~e~a p~l co.loxes in Sout~l California. This
figure is n~ a c~mpiete or exhaastiv~ map of every venal pool, but is m~t to p~ovide guidanc~ on areas wh~ra vemat
p~ls are ~own ~o ~cur. According to the Los Angeles District of the Eons ot'E~ginee~s, an ar~a shall ~ considered
vernal pool if i~ meets the following de~nilion:
V~al pools are wetlands that seasonally pond in small depressions as a r~sult of a a~all~w, relatively
impa~able layer (e.g. clay or other impe~ions soll or rook lay~) tha~ rest~c~s downward percolation
of water. Th~ dominant water sourc~ fo~ vernal pools i~ precipitation ~/ith poois typically filling after
fall and w~t~r rains and e~ag~rating during sp~ng and sa~e~. ~ese seasonal ponds are fragile, easily
distu:b~ ecosystems that provid~ habitat for indigenous, specialized assemblages of ~ora and fauna (sec
attached species list), including several s~ci~s which ar~ either proposed ov already Federally li~ted as
Ve~..al pools are considered "problem areas" under The Corps of Engineers 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual
because one or more of the wetland parameters (soils, hyd,~ology, vegetation) may be periodically lacking due to normal
sea~onal or a~ual va~a/iana in environ~mal conditions, Th~ delineation pr~eflures for problem areas o~tlined in the
1987 Wetland ~lineation ~nual should be app?ad to ~e~al pools.
In addition, a~ Individual Pe~t shall be required for any discharge of dredged of ~edged or fill material,
excavatiou, or mechau~zed landelea~ng ~s~iated wilh a singl~ project w~ch would:
1. resuh ~n an ag~egate loss or impact to 0.5 ac~e or greater of vernal ~1 basin (i. e ~he pool itself exclusive of ~he
su~ounding ~'a~ershed), as defined a~w A~;
2. where the vernal pool(s~ impacted contain at least one v~mal ~ol indictor species (list of species available
upon r~quest ~om the L~ Angeles Di~rict Regulata~ Branch),
Ii the discharge of fill would affect leas than 0.5 acre of vernal pool or the po~] d~s nat contain at least olde
vernal pool indicator species, only a ~e-Can~truction Notification ~s reqaired, and a nationwide petit verification may
be consider. The District Engineer retains discretionaw authority to requite an iudividual pe~t for f.l[~ which would
result in greater ~han ~nimaI impacts or would ~ contraD' to the public intense,
The following features are generally NOT considered venal pools anti, therefore, would not he subj~cl ~o this
regional general condition: stockponds, ~oad ru[s, nfinor impoundments on drainages, man-made ponds, abandoned
borcow sites, an~ seasonally flo~ed plains which do not exhibit'basin topography. These areas ~y already ~ subject
m Section 404 ~egulation and may sappo~ vernal pool species, s~h as fai~ $~imp a~d other inven~bra~s, pond tun!es,
amphibifina, and various [ypes of waterfowl; however, they a~ ~ot considered venal pools.
~Bditi0n ~ - Nationwide p~ymit 32. Comgleted Enforcement Actions:
Regional General Condition g2 limits the use of .NWP 32 to structures, work, or discharge of dredged o~ fill
~atefial remaining in place, ot undertaken for mitigation, restoration, ot environmental benefit in compliance with a
completed enforcement action, provided the ~tn~cture, work, or discharge of dredged or fill ~tedal d~s uot cause the
loss of greater than thre,: (3) acre~ of non-tidal waters of the United States. This modification was proposed to make this
NWP qonsistent with N-WP 26 which has an upper threshold of three acres.
4. Further information:
A. Congressional Authorities: You have been authorized to under~ake the activity described above pursuant
( ) Section tO of the Rivers and Harbors Agt of 1899 (33 USC. 403).'
(X') Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C 1344).
B. Limits of this authorization,
I. This permit does not obviate the need to obtain other Federal, state, or local'amhotSzations required
by la*v.
2. This permit does not grant any property rights or exclusive privileges.
3. This permit does not authorize any injm7 to the propeay or rights of oti~ers.
4. This pernqt does not authorize interference with an), existing or proposed Federal project.
C. Limits of Federal Liability. in issuing this perm. it, the Federal Oovemment does not assume any liability for
the following: .,
1. Damages to tho permkte~l p~oject or uses thereof as a result of other pe~mitte'J or unperm/ned
activities or from nataral causes.
2. Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of current or future activities undertaken
bb' or on behalf of the United States in the public interest.
3, Damages to persons, property, or to other permitted or unparmittod activities or structures caused by
the activity authorized by this pein'dr,
4. Design or construction deficiencies associated with the permitted work,
5. Damage claims assOCiated with any future modification, suspension, or revocation of this permit.
D. Reltance on Applicant's Data: The determination of this oft'~ce that issuance of this permit is not contrary to
the public interest was made In reliance on the information you provided.
IS. Reevaluation of permit Decision. This office may reevaluate its decision on this permit al any time the
~ircamstances warrant. Circumst~/nces that could require a reevaluation include, but are not limited to, the following: '
I. You fail to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit.
2. The information provided by you in support of your permit application proves to have been
incomplete, or inaccurate (See ~, above),
3, Significm~t n~'w i~.formation surfaces which this offic~ d~d ncr consider in reaching The original public
intere$~ decision.
Such a ~ee~alualion m~y result in a deformation fi'mt it is appropda~ ~o ~se ~h~ sus~nsion, modification, and
rev~tiov. ~cocedures contained ~n 33 C~ 330.5 or enfor~e~eu~ proceaures such as those contained in 33 CFR 326.4
and 326.5 The referenced enforce~nt pr~edures provide for the issuance of an administrative order requiring you to
comply with the ~m~s and conditions of your pe~it and for the initiation of legal action where appropriate You will
requir~ to pay for an~ co~ec6ve measure ordered by this office, and ifyo~ fail te comply with such dkective, ihis office
naay in certain simatioa~ (such as those specified in 33 ~R 209.1~03 accomplish the co~crive measures by contract or
otherwise at~d bill you for the cost.
F. This letter of verification is valid for a period no~ ~o exceed ~wo years unless the nationwide pe~t is
m~ifiefl, reissued, revoked, or expires before th:, time.
G. You must maintain t~ aet~vky authorized by this pe~it in good condkion and in eonfo~anee with
te~s ~nd conditions of ~his ~r~t. You are no~ relieved of this requirement if you abandon the ~ted activity.
akhough you tony make a good faith transfer ~o a third pa~y in compliance with General Condition H below. Should you
g'ish to cease to maintain the authorized acfivky or should you desire to abandon it withou~ a g~d faith transfer, you
must obtain a modification of ~his ~rmi~ from this office, which may require restoraiion of th~ area.
H. If you sell the prope~y associated wifl~ lhk pe~i, you must obtain the signature of the ne~ owner ia the
space provided and forward a copy of the pe~it to this office to validate the transfer of this authorization.
1. You must allow rep~sematives from this office to inspect the amhorized activity a~ any time deemed
necessary to ensure shat it is ~ing ~r has ~en acco?xplished wi~h the t~s and conditions of your pe~t.
United States Department of the Interior
Fish and Wildlife Service
Ecological Services
Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office
2730 Loker Avenue West
Carlsbad, California 92008
SEP 2 0 000
Denice Thomas
Case Planner
City of Temecula Planning Department
P.O. Box 9033 ' 1[~ ~ ,~ u tz t~ Illll
Temecula, California 9258,9-9033
Re: Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit 16,558, SF Churct~uilding,
PA00-0332,0333, City of Temecula, Riverside County, Califom~---i'ff'--"~~
Dear Ms. Thomas:
We have reviewed PA00-0332,0333, located in Riverside County, California. We offer the
following comments and recommendations on the biological resources that could be affected by
the proposed project based on our knowledge of sensitive and declining species and habitat types
in Riverside County.
We are concerned about "take" of federally listed species protected under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (Act), as amended. Section 9 of the Act prohibits the take of any federally
listed endangered species by any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Take
includes "harass" and "harm", as defined by section 3 of the Act. Harass in the definition of take
means "an intentional or negligent act or omission which creates the likelihood of injury to
wildlife by annoying it to such an extent as to significantly disrupt normal behavioral patterns
which include, but 'are not limited to, breeding, feeding, or sheltering." Harm in the definition of
take in the Act means "an act which actually kills or injures wildlife. Such an act may include
significant habitat modification or degradation where it actually kills or injures wildlife by
significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding or sheltering."
(see 50 CFR § 17.3). Take incidental to an otherwise lawful activity may be authorized under
sections 7 or 10 of the Act.
The proposed project is to construct a church building on 5.2 acres within the Campos Verdes
Specific Plan. The project site is located on the south side of General Kearny Road, east of
Margarita Road in Riverside County. This area is known to support habitat for threatened coastal
California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica, gnatcatcher), endangered Quino
checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas editha quino), endangered Stephens' kangaroo rat
(Dipodomys stephensi, SKR), and the sensitive burrowing owl (Athene canicularia). Populations
of these species have been documented in the Temecula area, and within Long Canyon wash. If
habitat, such as remnant coastal sage scrub, clay soils, or grasslands, occurs on the proposed
project site, then the site may support listed species. Therefore, we recommend that focused
Denice Thomas
2
surveys occur within suitable habitat on site prior to any ground disturbing activities. If these
wildlife species occupy the project site, incidental take authorization likely will be required
before the proposed project can proceed.
The proposed project occurs within the boundary of the Stephens' kangaroo rat Habitat
Conservation Plan. Compliance with the regional incidental take permit will be required prior to
any ground disturbing activities. If wetlands or Waters of the U.S. are affected by the proposed
project, an U.S. Army Corps of Engineers section 404 permit and/or California Department of
Fish and Game 1600 permit may be required. We recommend that impacts to coastal sage scrub
or any other sensitive resource be considered cumulatively significant under the California
Environmental Quality Act and mitigated prior to any ground disturbing activities.
We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed prQect. If you have any
questions or comments please contact Ruth Olsen of my staffat (760) 431-9440.
Sincerely,
Jim A. Bartel
Assistant Field Supervisor
1-6-00-NFTA453
cc: Glenn Black (CDFG, Chino)
ST. ATE OF CAUFORNIA--~USINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT 8
464 W Fourth Street, 6~' Floor MS 726
San Bemardino, CA 92401-1400
PHONE (909) 383-6327
FAX (909) 383-6890
September 18, 2000
08-Riv-79-R3.179
SEP P. i 2000
GRAY DAVIS, Governor
Ms. Denice Thomas
Planning Department
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Dear Ms. Thomas:
Planning Application No. 00-0332/0333, New 16,558 SF Church,
Cornwall Associates, Applicant
We have received the Development Review Committee transmittal package for above referenced item,
pertaining to a 5.2-acre parcel located to the southeast of State Route 79, on North General Keamey Road.
The following comments addressing expected project impact to nearby State right of way are provided for
the Committee's consideration at the meeting scheduled on September 19, 2000.
Because this proposed chumh is located some disthnce from State Route 79 right of way, we do not expect
project approval to result in a direct, adverse impact to existing State transportation facilities. However, our
concern with "cumulative" traffic impacts resulting from continued development in this area remains.
With this in mind, we recommend ensuring compliance with pertinent traffic impact mitigation measures
identified in the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Campos Verdes Specific Plan development.
If the traffic volumes expected with this proposed use do not correspond to the volumes identified in the
Specific Plan EIR for this Planning Area, we recommend requiring preparation of a project traffic study to
update the Specific Plan EIR analysis and identify appropriate impact mitigation measures for project
implementation.
Thank you for providing us this opportunity to review and offer our comments concerning this new church
proposal. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Ms. Rosa F. Clark at (909) 383-6908
for assistance.
Sincerely,
LINDA GRIMES, Chief
Office of ForecastingrlGR-CEQA Review
Transportation Planning Division
C:\Clark's WorkLLtrs~Riv\79TEM_PA00-0332_LDSChurch_DP-CUP_DRC.drm
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
EXHIBITS
R:~ P~00-0332 LDS Church\Staff Repor[,doc
25
CITY OFTEMECULA
CASE NOS. - PA00-0332
EXHIBIT - A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- December 20, 2000
VICINITY MAP
R:\D P\00-0332 LDS Church\Staff Report. doc
23
CITY OF TEMECULA
EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - PLANNING AREA 2- CAMPOS VERDES SPECIFIC PLAN
,00000000(
~00oo00000oo00,
EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION - PROFESSIONAL OFFICE/OPEN SPACE
CASE NOS. - PA00-0332
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - December 20, 2000
R:\D P\00-0332 LDS Church\Staff Report.doc
27
CITY OFTEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA00-0332
EXHIBIT- D
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - December 20, 2000
SITE PLAN
R:\D P\00-0332 LDS Church\Staff Report.doc
25
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA00-0332
EXHIBIT- E
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - December 20, 2000
GRADING PLAN
R:\D P\00-0332 LDS Church\Staff Report.doc
26
CITY OFTEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA00-0332
EXHIBIT - F
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - December 20, 2000
ELEVATIONS
R:\D P\00-0332 LDS Church\Staff Report.doc
27
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA00-0332
EXHIBIT - G ELEVATIONS
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE -December 20, 2000
R:\D P\00-0332 LDS Church\Staff Report.doc
28
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA00-0332
EXHIBIT - H
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE -December 20, 2000
FLOOR PLANS
R:\D P\00-0332 LOS Church\Staff Report.doc
29
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA00-0332
EXHIBIT - I L~NDSCAPE PLAN
PI-~NNI~G COMMISSION DAT£ -Do¢omber 20, 2000
R:\D P\00-0332 LDS Church\Staff Report,doc
33
ITEM #6
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
December 20, 2000
Planning Application No. 00-0257 (Conditional Use Permit)
Prepared by: Rolfe Preisendanz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
1.
The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff
recommends the Planning Commission:
ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-._
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULAAPPROVlNG PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-
0257, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO DESIGN, CONSTRUCT
AND OPERATE A UNMANNED SPRINT WIRELESS
COMMUNICATION FACILITY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO
CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT'S NORMA MARSHA RESERVOIR
SITE LOCATED AT 41520 MARGARITA ROAD AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 940-230-002
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
APPLICATION INFORMATION
Tim Lencioni / Sprint PCS
William Bennett/SBA, Inc.
To design, construct and operate an unmanned Sprint wireless
telecommunication facility.
LOCATION: Norma Marsha Reservoir Site, east of Margarita Road, south of
Rancho California Road and north of Rancho Vista Road
EXISTING ZONING: (PI) Public Institutional
SURROUNDING ZONING: North: Margarita Village Specific Plan
South: Margarita Village Specific Plan
East: Margarita Village Specific Plan
West: (LM) Low Medium Density Residential
GENERAL PLAN:
Public / Institutional Facilities
EXISTING LAND USE: Rancho California Water District Water Tank
R:\C U P\00-0257 Spdnt PCS~Staff Report.doc
1
SURROUNDING LAND
USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS
North: Apartments
South: Temecula Valley United Methodist Church
East: Detached Single Family Residences
West: Detached Single Family Residences
Lot Area:
743 square feet
Mono-pine Height: 57 feet
BACKGROUND
The City of Temecula approved a 60' high monopole on this site in 1996. This approval expired on
June 11, 1998. The current application was submitted to the Planning Department on June 30,
2000. The Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting was held on July 27, 2000. The DRC
meeting prompted various comments, which were detailed for the applicant in a letter dated August
21, 2000. There was a follow-up incomplete letter transmitted to the applicant on November 15,
2000, which addressed additional concerns. The project was deemed complete on December 5,
2000.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project proposes to develop an unmanned Sprint PCS wireless telecommunication facility
located at the Rancho California Water District's Norma Marsha Reservoir site. The site will be
leased from the Rancho California Water District and will obtain access from Margarita Road onto a
15-foot wide access/utility easement. The project proposes a 57' high Sprint (RV35XC100B) mono-
pine pole with 6 antenna panels. Each panel is 54" long x 6" wide x 3.5" deep each. Three of the
panels at this location will be provided for future antenna co-location.
ANALYSIS
Site Desi,qn
The project is generally located on the east side of Margarita Road, north of Rancho Vista Road,
south of Rancho California Road at the Rancho California Water District's Norma Marsha Reservoir
site. The mono-pine pole will be located approximately 30 feet southwest of the existing water tank
east of Margarita Road. The equipment area will be located on a cement slab, within an 8'-5" high
retaining block wall and a 5'-0" high chain link fence to be placed on top of the wall for safety. An
Emergency Generator Parking area will be developed to the west of the equipment area, between
the mono-pine pole and the equipment area.
Access, Traffic and Circulation
Access for the site will be taken from Margarita Road. The Public Works Department has reviewed
traffic impacts associated with this project and has indicated that the impacts of the project will not
be significant. Emergency vehicles are able to traverse the site to provide the appropriate fire and
life safety services.
R:\C U P~00-0257 Sprint PCS~Staff Report.doc
2
Architecture, Color and Materials
The design of the monopole is considered"stealth", indicating that the antennas will be adequately
camouflaged from view by the use of multiple branches, which will be located on the pole as to
effectively demonstrate a typical pine tree. The pole itself will be covered with simulated bark so as
to provide the appearance of a living tree. The appearance of the proposed monopine and
equipment shelter is contained in Attachment No. 3 / Exhibit "E".
Landscaping
The site is currently landscaped with a sufficient amount of landscaping. Some trees located in the
proposed lease area are to be removed. The applicant has submitted a landscape plan(Exhibit F),
that confirms that any trees removed for the project development will be replaced as necessary to
provide an equivalent amount of foliage.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This project, known as PA00-0257, is the second attempt to develop this site for an unmanned
wireless communication facility. On July 11, 1996 a similar project, known as PA96-0063 was
approved. The project approved a 60' high monopole, which was not camouflaged as a "stealth"
facility. However the project was never developed and consequently expired on July 11, 1998. An
environmental review was completed for this original application, which determined that a Negative
Declaration with a De Minimus finding was appropriate. Because the current application proposes a
shorter monopole that will be camouflaged as "stealth" no new environmental review will be
conducted.
To support this determination staff has reviewed Section 15162 of the California Environmental
Quality Act Guidelines to determine if subsequent review is needed. According to CEQA, if the
following conditions are not met then no additional review is needed.
Substantial changes are proposed in the project, which will require major revisions of the
previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or substantial
increase in the severity of previously identified significant effect.
The applicant is not proposing any substantial changes which would adversely increase
any previously identified significant effects. The project proposes mitigation measures
that will camouflage the impact of the pole by the use of simulated pine branches and
simulated tree bark. The height of the proposed monopole has also been reduced from
60 feet to 67 feet.
Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is
undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to involvement of new
significant effects or substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant
impacts.
The circumstances that existed at the time the Negative Declaration was prepared have
not changed significantly. The development that has occurred in the vicinity of the
project is consistent with the Development Code and the General Plan.
New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been
known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was adopted, is
present.
R:\C U P\00-0257 Sprint PCS~Staff Report.doc
3
The project has no significant effects that weren't discussed in the previous Negative
Declation. No new mitigation measures are proposed for the project.
Based on the previous discussion, it has been found that the project will require no further
environmental review pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines.
EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
The General Plan Land Use designation for the site is (PI) Public / Institutional Facilities. Existing
zoning for the site is the (PI) Public Institutional.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The project has been determined by staff to be consistent with all-applicable City ordinances,
standards, guidelines, and policies. The project is compatible with surrounding developments in
terms of design and quality, and staff is recommending approval.
FINDINGS
Conditional Use Permit
The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the development
code.
Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds that the proposed conditional use permit is
consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan and the applicable sections of the
Development Code, and the Municipal Code.
The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition, and development of
adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely
affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures.
Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds that the proposed conditional use permit is
consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan and the applicable sections of the
Development Code, and the Municipal Code.
The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer area, landscaping and other
development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning
Commission or Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood.
Planning staff has reviewed the requirements of the performance standards
delineated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable
sections of the Development Code. As a result, staff has determined that the
proposed conditional use meets the zoning requirements for the (PI) Public
Institutional district.
The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety, and
welfare of the community.
Provisions are made in the General Plan and the Development Code to ensure that the
public health, safety, and welfare are safeguarded. The project is consistent with
these documents and will be conditioned to meet all applicable requirements.
R:\C U P~00-0257 Sprint PCS~Staff Reportdoc
4
5. The decision to conditionally approve the conditional use permit is based on substantial
evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council.
The project has been completely reviewed, as a whole, in reference to all applicable
codes and ordinances before the Planning Commission.
Development Plan
The design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental
damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There are no
fish, wild life, or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish, wildlife, or
habitat off-site. The site is surrounded by development and is an in-fill site. The project will
not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in
Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code.
Attachments-
PC Resolution - Blue Page 6
Exhibit A: Conditions of Approval for PA00-0257 (Conditional Use Permit) - Blue Page 9
Exhibits for PA00-0257 (Conditional Use Permit) - Blue Page 15
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C. General Plan Map
D. Site Plan
E. Elevations
F. Landscape Plans
G. Material and Color Board
R:\C U P~00-0257 Sprint PCS~Staff Report.doc
5
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
APPROVING PA00-0257
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
R:\C U P~00-0257 Sprint PCS~Staff Report.doc
6
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-020
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA00-0257, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO DESIGN,
CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A UNMANNED SPRINT WIRELESS
COMMUNICATION FACILITY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO
CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT'S NORMA MARSHA RESERVOIR
SITE LOCATED AT 41520 MARGARITA ROAD AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 940-230-002
WHEREAS, Tim Lencioni, representing Sprint PCS, filed Planning Application No. 00-0257,
in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. 00-0257 was processed including, but not limited to a
public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning
Application No. 00-0257 on December 20, 2000, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by
law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in
support or in opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. 00-0257 subject to the conditions
after finding that the project proposed in Planning Application No. 00-0257 conformed to the City of
Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No.
00-0257 (Conditional Use Permit) hereby makes the following findings as required by Section
17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan, the applicable
sections of the Development Code. Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds that the proposed
conditional use permit is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan and the applicable
sections of the Development Code, and the Municipal Code.
B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition, and
development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the proposed conditional use will not
adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. Staff has reviewed the proposal and
finds that the proposed conditional use permit is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan
and the applicable sections of the Development Code, and the Municipal Code.
C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer area, landscaping and
other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning
Commission or Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. Planning
staff has reviewed the requirements of the performance standards delineated in the Antenna
Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code. As a
R:\C U P\00-0257 Sprint PCS~Staff Report,doc
result, staff has determined that the proposed conditional use meets the zoning requirements for the
(PI) Public Institutional district.
D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety,
and general welfare of the community. Provisions are made in the General Plan and the
Development Code to ensure that the public health, safety, and welfare are safeguarded. The
project is consistent with these documents and will be conditioned to meet all applicable
requirements.
E. The decision to conditionally approve the application for a conditional use permit is
based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or
City Council on appeal. The project has been completely reviewed, as a whole, in reference to all
applicable codes and ordinances before the Planning Commission.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Negative Declaration has previously been
prepared and approved by the Planning Director on July 11,1996 for a facility with a potentially
greater impact. Whereas the conditions under which the Negative Declaration and amendments
were prepared have not changed substantially and the project is consistent with the environmental
review pursuant to Article 11, Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act. Therefore,
the Planning Commission has determined that no further environmental review is required for the
proposed project and that the previous Negative Declaration will be re-certified for this project.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves Planning Application No. 00-0257 (Conditional Use Permit) request for a
conditional use permit to design, construct, and operate an unmanned Sprint PCS wireless
telecommunication facility located east of the Margarita Road, south of Rancho California Road and
north of Rancho Vista Road and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 940-230-002, subject to the
project specific conditions set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this
reference.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 20th day of December 2000.
Ron Guerriero, Chairperson
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of December,
2000, by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\C U P\00-0257 Sprint PCS~Staff Report.doc
8
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PA00-0257 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
R:\C U P\00-0257 Sprint PCS~Staff Report,doc
9
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OFAPPROVAL
Planning Application No: PA00-0257 (Conditional Use Permit)
Project Description:
Request for a Conditional Use Permit to design,
construct, and operate an unmanned Sprint PCS wireless
telecommunication facility.
DIF Category:
Potentially Exempt
Assessor's Parcel No:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
940-230-002
December 20, 2000
December 20, 2002
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division a
cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of seventy-
eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice
of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California
Code of Regulations Section 15062. An environment review was completed for this
application, which determined that a Negative Declaration with a De Minimus finding was
appropriate. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the
Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as required above, the
approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and
Game Code Section 711.4(c)).
General Requirements
The permittee/applicant shall indemnity, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency
or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all
claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary
damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof,
advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters
of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the
appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4
(Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167).
The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding
brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the
action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional
deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions
of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly
notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify,
defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its
officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit,
the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the applicant.
R:\C u P~00-0257 Sprint PCS~Staff Report.doc
10
3. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this
conditional use permit.
This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's
Development Code.
The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this Conditional Use Permit.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits D
(Site Plan), E (Elevations), F (Landscape Plans), and G (Material and Color Board),
contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division.
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
Future co-located antenna panels, in conformance with this application, may be
administratively approved by the Planning Director
10.
The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted on Exhibit
"G" (Color and Material Board), contained on file with the Community Development
Department - Planning Division.
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
11.
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
12.
The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one signed
set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files.
13.
The applicant shall revise Exhibits "D, E, F, and G", (Site Plan, Elevations, Landscape Plan,
and Color and Material Board) to reflect the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Community Development Department Planning division staff. The applicant shall
submit five (5) full size copies, one (1) reduced 8.5"xl 1" copy of Exhibits "D" through "F", and
two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of approved Exhibit "G" (Color and
Materials Board) to the Community Development Department for their files. All labels on the
Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints.
R:\C U P~00-0257 Sprint PCS~Staff Report.doc
11
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
14. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
15.
An Administrative Development Plan application for signage shall be required for any
signage not included on Exhibits "D" and "F', or as amended by these conditions. A
separate building permit shall be required for all signage identified on the approved Exhibits
"D" and "F', or as amended by these conditions.
16.
17.
All previously existing landscape planting and irrigation shall be restored consistent with the
previously approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the
Planning Director. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The
irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Unless otherwise noted, the Developer, at no cost to any Government Agency, shall
complete all conditions. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan
all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints
and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for
further review and revision.
General Requirements
18. The lease area, as designated on the construction plans, shall be fenced.
19.
20.
A copy of the proposed recorded public utility easements shall be submitted to the
Department of Public Works.
A compaction report shall be submitted to the Department of Public for review and approval
for the mono-pine pole and all proposed structures.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
22.
All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Fire Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the
Temecula Municipal Code.
23. Exterior service lighting shall comply with the provisions of Palomar Lighting Ordinance
No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be
shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside
lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or
public rights-of-way.
24. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
25.
Provide structural calculations for monopole foundation, all concrete block wails, and
concrete walls with chain link extensions with appropriate stamp of a registered professional
with original signature on plans for plan review.
R:~C U P\00-0257 Sprint PCS~Staff Report,doc
12
26. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule for plan review.
27.
Obtain a location street address number prior to submitting structural plans to Building and
Safety for plan review.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
28.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Fire Prevention Bureau
reviews building plans. These conditions will be based on occupancy; use, the California
Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at
the time of building plan submittal.
29.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at
20-PSI residual operating pressure with a 2-hour duration. The required fire flow may be
adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or
automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire
Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2,
Appendix Ill-A)
30.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6" x
4"x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public
streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be
located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access
road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent
hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC
903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
31.
As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved mute around the
exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire
flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
32.
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVVV with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet.
(CFC sec 902)
33.
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. (CFC
902.2.2.6 Ord."99-14)
35.
Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet, which have not been completed, shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
36. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, and spacing and minimum fire flow standards.
R:\C U P\00-0257 Sprint PCS~Staff Report,doc
13
After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the
Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants
shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible
building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National
Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1 )
37.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
38.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a
contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial
buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum
of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall give a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or
numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single-family residences and multi-family
residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire
Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
39.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4)
40.
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
Special Conditions
41.
Prior to building permit issuance a simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each on 8 ½ X
11 inch paper must be submitted. An electronic version may be acceptable, contact fire
prevention for acceptable file formats and approval.
OTHER AGENCIES
42.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the letter from Rancho
California Water District dated July 25,2000.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand, and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant Name
R:\C U P~00-0257 Spdnt PCS~Staff Report.doc
14
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
EXHIBITS
R:\C U P~00-0257 Sprint PCS\Staff Repo[t.doc
15
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NOS. - PA00-0257
EXHIBIT - A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- December 20, 2000
VICINITY MAP
R:\C U P\00-0257 Spdnt PCS\Staff Report.doc
16
CITY OF TEMECULA
EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP
PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL (PI)
EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION - PUBLIC/INSTITUTIONAL FACILITIES
CASE NOS. - PA00-0257
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - December 20, 2000
R:\C U P\00-0257 Spdnt PCS\Staff Report.doc
17
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA00-0257
EXHIBIT - D
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - December 20, 2000
SITE PLAN
R:\C U P\00-0257 Spdnt PCS\Staff Report.doc
18
CITY OF TEMECULA
n \,: ~ I~ ,,' ' ..... :::'i- ;:r-m ~t'"~~ -~- -~:%"T~'I~/
t~_~1~ ~i~ii~i~ii ................................ i~.q~l~ ~ ~=
CASE NO. - PA00-0257
EXHIBIT - E ELEVATIONS
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - December 20, 2000
R:\C U P\00-0257 Sprint PCS\Staff Report.doc
19
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA00-0257
EXHIBIT - F I_~NDSCAPE PLANS
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - December 20, 2000
R:\C U P\00-0257 Spdnt PCS\Staff Report. doc
20
ITEM #7
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
December 20, 2000
Planning Application No. 00-0389 (Development Plan)
Prepared by: Rolfe Preisendanz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
1.
The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff
recommends the Planning Commission:
ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-__
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-
0389, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO DESIGN, CONSTRUCT AND
OPERATE A 38,349 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING FOR
NASCAL INTERPLEX, INC. ON 4.09 VACANT ACRES WITHIN
WESTSlDE BUSINESS CENTRE, PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP
24085-3. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
REMINGTON AVENUE AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL
NO. 909-370-013;
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
Walt Allen / Davidson + Allen Architects
Walt Allen
To design, construct and operate a 38,349 square foot industrial
building (including unfinished office area and mezzanine) on 4.09
acres of vacant land within the Westside Business Centre.
South side of Remington Avenue approximately 500 feet west of the
Diaz Road.
Light Industrial (LI)
North: Light Industrial (LI)
South: Light Industrial (LI)
East: Light Industrial (LI)
West: Light Industrial (LI)
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION:
EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant
R:~D P\00-0389 NASCAL Interpiex, Inc\Staff Report.doc
Business Park (BP)
SURROUNDING LAND
USES:
North: Vacant
South: Industrial Building
East: Diaz Super Storage
West: Vacant
PROJECT STATISTICS (DEVELOPMENT PLAN)
Lot Area (gross):
178,232 square feet (4.09 acres)
Lot area (net)
161,852 square feet (3.72 acres)
Footprint:
28,092 square feet
Building Square footage:
28,092 square feet (finished area), 6867 square feet
mezzanine, & 3,390 square feet (unfinished office area)
Building Height: 30 feet
Landscaped Area:
38,847 square feet (24% of net lot area and 22% of gross lot
area)
Parking Required:
80 vehicular, 4 handicapped, 4 bicycle, and 6 motorcycle
Parking Provided:
93 vehicular, 4 handicapped, 4 bicycle, and 6 motorcycle
Lot Coverage: 17.3%
Floor Area Ratio: 0.22
BACKGROUND
The formal application was submitted to the Planning Department on August 28, 2000. The
Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting was held on November 2, 2000. The DRC
meeting prompted various comments, which were detailed for the applicant in a letter dated
November 7, 2000. The letter dated November 7, 2000 also deemed the project incomplete. The
applicant revised the site plan to comply with the comments provided by staff and resubmitted again
on November 14, 2000. The project was deemed complete on December 4, 2000.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project, NASCAL Interplex, Inc., proposes to develop 4.09 gross vacant acres with a 38,349
square foot manufacturing industrial building, which includes 3,390 square feet of unfinished office
area and 6,867 square feet of unfinished mezzanine area. NASCAL Interplex, Inc is a
manufacturing company specializing in high speed metal stamping and injection molding. The
primary function of the site will be the manufacturing of products used in electronic connectors,
circuit boards connectors, aircraft and automotive connectors, aircraft and automotive connectors as
well as telecommunications. The building is being built as an expansion to their main plant located
in Tustin, California. They will initially employ 8 to 15 people and operate a single shift between the
hours of 6:00 to 5:00 P.M. Other than 36 employee daily trips, they will be utilizing UPS trucks and
semi tractor-trailer trucks three times a week for delivery.
R:\D P\00-0389 NASCAL Interplex, Inc~Staff Report.doc
2
ANALYSIS
Site Design
The project is located on the south side of Remington Avenue, appro)~imately 500 feet west of Diaz
Road. The building is situated on the west side of the parcel, leaving an area on the east side for
future expansion. This expansion area will be developed with decomposed granite to mitigate any
erosion potential. Additionally the applicant proposes an 8'-0" "wing wall" to screen this area from
the northeast corner of the building. The lot coverage for this project has been calculated to be
17.3%. The City of Temecula Development Code allows maximum lot coverage of 40% in the Light
Industrial (LI) designation. The City of Temecula Development Code identifies a target floor area
ratio of 0.40 for development within the Light Industrial (LI) designation. The floor area ratio (FAR)
for the project is 0.22
Access, Traffic and Circulation
Access for the site will be taken from Remington Avenue. Two driveways located at the east and
west corners of the site, will provide access to the site from Remington Avenue. Parking for the
project is located on the west, north, and south side of the property, with the entrance of the building
being oriented towards the northeast. The Public Works Department has reviewed traffic impacts
associated with this project and has indicated that the impacts of the project are within the traffic
volumes predicted as a part of the City General Plan and will not be significant. Emergency vehicles
are able to access the site to provide the appropriate fire and life safety services.
Architecture1 Color and Materials
The design and detailing of the building's architecture is in keeping with the existing industrial
building design. The variations in building form throughout the project provide visual interest to the
project through the use of defined wall articulations and natural concrete theme. The unique
architectural definition of the entry will provide visual interest that will draw attention to the building's
entry. The warehouse/manufacturing area will be painted a "concrete" grey. The large elements
flanking the entry will be medium textured, natural exposed aggregate concrete. These will have a
non-gloss sealer applied to them, which will provide a slight darkening effect to the natural mix. The
lintels covering the entry porch and two columns will be a heavily textured exposed aggregate. The
window glass will be reflective blue with a brushed natural aluminum-storefront-sash-system. All the
doors and Iouvered openings and the feature strip at the parapet level will be painted a darker
shade of "concrete" grey to accent the natural gradation of the exposed aggregate. The applicant is
proposing the use of two different colors with the use of exposed aggregate on the large "pop-out"
elements near the entry. The exterior of the building is primarily painted concrete augmented with
the use of recessed panels. The landscape is a semi-xeriscape featuring a dry stream bed
represented by native rock and boulders.
Si,qnaRe
Signage is not a part of this application. The review of signage will be conducted under a separate
application at a later date.
Landscapin.q
The City of Temecula Development Code requires projects within the Light Industrial (LI)
designation to provide minimum landscaping and open space areas of 20%. The amount of
landscape materials proposed on site by the applicant is 38,847 square feet or (24%) with an
additional area of 31,851 square feet of Decomposed Granite (DG). This area of "DG" has been
designated for possible future expansion and meets the intent of the Development Code (Chapter
17.08.060 C.2.) in relation to erosion control and has been found to be a satisfactory implementation
R:~D P~00-0389 NASCAL Interplex, ~nc~Staff Report.doc
3
of product by our landscape consultant. Additionally, the applicant is proposing a wing wall, which
will screen this area of "DG" from the view of the public right of way.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The class of this project has been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment
and is therefore found to be categorically exempt per, Section t5332 In-fill Development Projects
of the CEQA Guidelines, from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents. The
following conditions have been addressed:
(a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable
general plan policies, as well as, with applicable zoning designation and regulations.
The project is located within the Business Park (BP) General Plan designation and the
Light Industrial (LI) zoning district. Since the project will be used primarily as a
manufacturing use it is consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan and
permitted within the Light Industrial Zoning district.
(b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five
acres substantially surrounded by urban uses.
The proposed project is located at 42006 Remington Avenue and is within the City of
Temecula. The parcel contains 4.09 gross acres and is surrounded by existing and
proposed urban uses.
(c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species.
The site has been previously disturbed and graded and supports no biological
resources. The project is not located within any predetermined potential
environmentally sensitive habitat areas.
(d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air
quality, or water quality.
The project is consistent with the elements of the City of Temecula's General Plan and
is therefore found not to result in any significant effects related to traffic, noise, air
quality, or water quality not previously addressed by the General Plan.
(e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.
The project site is fully improved with water, sewer, electricity, telephone, and natural
gas. Additionally, the site is located within the incorporated city limits and will enjoy
ali services provided by the City of Temecula.
Based on the previous discussion, it has been found that the project will require no further
environmental review pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines.
EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
The General Plan Land Use designation for the site is (BP) Business Park. Existing zoning for the
site is (LI) (Light Industrial). The project as proposed, meets all minimum standards of and is
consistent with the General Plan, the Development Code, local ordinances, and the Design
Guidelines.
R:~D P~00-0389 NASCAL Interplex, Inc~Staff Report.doc
4
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The project has been determined by staff to be consistent with all-applicable City ordinances,
standards, guidelines, and policies. It is staff's opinion that the project is compatible with
surrounding developments in terms of design and quality.
FINDINGS
The proposed use is in conformance with the general plan for Temecula and with applicable
requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City.
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for
development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development
standards for (LI) Light Industrial zoning. The site is therefore properly planned and
zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of industrial
development proposed. The project as conditioned is also consistent with other
applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and
building codes.
The overall development of the land is designed fro the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and
other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the
health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been
reviewed, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable
policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the
development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public
health, safety and welfare.
The design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their
habitat. There are no fish, wildlife, or habitat on the project site, and the project will
not affect any fish, wildlife, or habitat off-site. The site is surrounded by development
and is an in-fill site. The project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse
effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code.
Attachments-
PC Resolution - Blue Page 6
Exhibit A: Conditions of Approval for PA00-0389 (Development Plan) - Blue Page 9
4
Exhibits for PA00-0389 (Development Plan) - Blue Page 20
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C. General Plan Map
D. Site Plan
E. Grading Plan
F. Building Elevations
G. Wall Elevation
H. First Floor Plan
I. Mezzanine Floor Plan
J. Landscape Plan
R:~D P\00-0389 NASCAL Interplex, Inc~Staff Report.doc
5
ATTACHMENT NO. t
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
APPROVING PA00-0389
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
R:~D P\00-0389 NASCAL Interplex, Inc~Staff Report.doc
6
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-020
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CiTY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-
0389, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO DESIGN, CONSTRUCT AND
OPERATE A 38,349 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING FOR
NASCAL INTERPLEX, INC. ON 4.09 VACANT ACRES WITHIN
WESTSlDE BUSINESS CENTRE PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP
24085-3. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
REMINGTON AVENUE AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL
NO. 909-370-013;
WHEREAS, Walt Allen, Davidson + Allen Architects, representing NASCAL Interplex Inc.,
filed Planning Application No. 00-0389, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General
Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. 00-0389 was processed including, but not limited to a
public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning
Application No. 00-0389 on December 20, 2000, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by
law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in
support or in opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. 00-0389 subject to the conditions
after finding that the project proposed in Planning Application No. 00-0389 conformed to the City of
Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No.
00-0389 (Development Plan) hereby makes the following findings as required by Section
17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for
development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for (LI)
Light Industrial development contained in the City's Development Code.
B. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and
other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and safety
of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed and as conditioned, has
been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations
intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent
with the public health, safety, and welfare.
C. The design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There
is no fish or wildlife habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish or wildlife
RSD P~00-o38g NASCAL Inteq~lex, tnc'~Staff Report.doc
7
habitat off-site. The site is surrounded by development and is an in-fill site. Furthermore, grading
has already occurred at the site, which is a portion of a larger industrial park. The project will not
individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2
of the Fish and Game Code.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The project has been found to be categorically
exempt Pursuant to Section 15332 class 32 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.
No further environmental review is required for the proposed project.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves Planning Application No. 00-0389 (Development Plan), a request to design,
construct, and operate a 38,349 square foot Industrial Building on 4.09 gross vacant acres. The
project is located on the south side of Remington Avenue; 500 feet west of Diaz Road and known as
Assessor's Parcel Number 909-370-013, subject to the project specific conditions set forth in Exhibit
A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 20th day of December 2000.
Ron Guerriero, Chairperson
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of December,
2000, by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\D P\00-0389 NASCAL Inte~plex, Inc~Staff Report.doc
8
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PA00-0389 DEVELOPMENT PLAN
R:\D P\00-0389 NASCAL Interplex, Inc\Staff Report.doc
9
EXHIBIT a
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OFAPPROVAL
Planning Application No: PA00-0389 (Development Plan)
Project Description:
Project Name:
Request for a Development Plan to design, construct,
and operate a 38,349 square foot industrial building on
4.09 vacant acres within the Westside Business Centre.
NASCAL Interplex Inc.
DIF Category:
ndustrial
Assessor's Parcel No: 909-370-013
Approval Date:
December 20, 2000
Expiration Date:
December 20, 2002
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within
1.
Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department- Planning Division a
cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of seventy-
eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice
of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California
Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant
has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check
as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of
condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
General Requirements
The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency
or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all
claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary
damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof,
advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters
of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the
appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4
(Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167).
The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding
brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the
action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional
deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions
of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly
notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify,
defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its
officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit,
the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the applicant.
R:~D P~00-0389 NASCAL Interplex, Inc~Staff Report.doc
10
3. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this
Development Plan.
The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this development plan.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits D
(Site Plan), E (Grading Plan), F (Elevation), G (Elevation), H (Floor Plan), I (Floor Plan), J
(Landscape Plans) and K (Color and Material Board) contained on file with the Community
Development Department - Planning Division.
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed
below the lowest level of the surrounding parapet wall.
The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly
below and with Exhibit "K" (Color and Material Board), contained on file with the Community
Development Department - Planning Division.
Primary wall:
Accent Color:
Architectural Elements @ Entry:
Storefront
Glazing
Vista 610 (1) Summer Wind LRV-66
Vista 612 (1) Centurian LRV-48
Exposed aggregate concrete
Brushed Aluminum
Ford, Blue reflective
10.
The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities,
which are screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines.
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
11.
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
12.
The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
bythe Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one signed
set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files.
13.
The applicant shall revise Exhibits "D, E, F, G, H, I J and K", (Site Plan, Grading Plan,
Elevation(s), Floor Plan(s), Landscape Plan, and Color and Material Board) to reflect the
final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Community Development Department
- Planning Division staff. The applicant shall submit five (7) full size copies, one (1) reduced
8.5'xl 1" copy of Exhibits D through I, two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of
R:~D P~00-0389 NASCAL Interplex, Inc~Staff Report.doc
11
approved Exhibit "K" (Color and Materials Board) and (2) 8" x 10" glossy photographic color
prints of the colored version of approved Exhibit "F" and "G", the colored architectural
elevations, to the Community Development Department Planning Division for their files. All
labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the
photographic prints.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
14. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
15.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the
Community Development Department - Planning Division for approval. These plans shall
conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "J', oras amended by these conditions. The
location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The
plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify
the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be
accompanied by the following items:
Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of
submittal).
One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
16.
An Administrative Development Plan application for signage shall be required for any
signage not included on Exhibits "D" and "F", or as amended by these conditions. A
separate building permit shall be required for all signage identified on the approved Exhibits
"D" and "F", or as amended by these conditions.
17.
All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the
approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Director.
The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall
be properly constructed and in good working order.
18.
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Director, to guarantee
the maintenance of the landscape plantings, in accordance with the approved construction
landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Community Development Department -
Planning Division for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the
landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the
Planning Director, the bond shall be released.
19.
The Development Impact Fees associated with this project must be paid to the City of
Temecula.
20.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
R:~D P\00-0389 NASCAL Interplex, Inc~Staff Report.doc
12
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground,
or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-
street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating
the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for
persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense.
Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000."
21.
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3
square feet in size.
22.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
23.
All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Fire Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the
Temecula Municipal Code.
24.
Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with
Palomar Lighting Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights
and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of
Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
25.
Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
26.
A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to commencement of
any construction or inspections.
27.
Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the buildings is required. The
path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross slope,
travel slope, stripping, and signage. Provide all details on plans. {California Disabled
Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998). Provide precise grading plan for plan check
submittal to check for handicap accessibility
28.
29.
All buildings shall comply with the applicable provisions of the California Disabled Access
Regulations effective April 1, 1998.
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans and
structural calculations submitted for plan review.
30. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule for plan review.
31.
Provide house-electrical meters at each building for the purpose of providing power for fire
alarm systems and exterior lighting.
R:~D P\00-0389 NASCAL Interpiex, Inc~Staff Report,doc
13
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
Schematic plumbing plans, electrical plan and Icad calculations, along with mechanical
equipment and ducting plans shall be submitted for plan review stamped and original signed
by an appropriate registered professional.
Obtain street addresses from the Building Official prior to submittal of plans for plan review.
Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
Restroom fixtures, number, and type shall be in accordance with the provisions of the
1998 edition of the California Building Code, Appendix Chapter 29.
Provide an approved precise grading plan for plan check submittal for checking of site-
disabled accessibility.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy; use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM
at 20-PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 1850 GPM for
a total fire flow of 3350 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given
above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6" x
4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public
streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be
located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access
road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent
hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC
903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the
exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire
flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access reads for use until permanent reads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
R:~D P\00-0389 NASCAL Interplex, Inc~Staff Report.doc
14
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVVV with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (
CFC sec 902)
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
The gradient for a fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. (CFC
902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14)
Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet, which have not been completed, shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, and spacing and minimum fire flow standards.
After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the
Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants
shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible
building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National
Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a
contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial
buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum
of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall give a minimum of six (8) inch high letters and/or
numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single-family residences and multi-family
residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire
Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy, or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10)
52.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4)
R:\D P\00-0389 NASCAL Interplex, Inc~Staff Report.doc
15
53.
54.
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
55.
56.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, building final or occupancy, buildings
housing high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions of Uniform Fire Code
Article 81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. The storage of
high-piled combustible stock may require structural design considerations or modifications to
the building. Fire protection and life safety features may include some or all of the following:
an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage
arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department
access doors and Fire department access roads. (CFC Article 81)
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant
shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the
storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids, or any other hazardous materials from
both the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3)
Special
57.
58.
58.
60.
Conditions
Prior to building permit issuance, a full technical report shall be submitted to and approved
by the Fire Prevention Bureau addressing all items on the hazardous materials list. This
report shall address, but not be limited to, all fire, and life safety measures per 1998 CFC,
1998 CBC, NFPA - 13, 24, 72, and 231-C.
Prior to building permit issuance a simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each on 8 % X
11 inch paper must be submitted. An electronic version may be acceptable, contact fire
prevention for acceptable file formats and approval.
The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit.
These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per
the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department of
Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material
Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any
quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any
additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E)
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
61. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all
existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints
and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for
further review and revision.
R:'g P\00-0389 NASCAL Interplex, Inc~Staff Reportdoc
16
General Requirements
62.
A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site fiat work and
improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
63.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
64.
All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
Pdor to Issuance of a Grading Permit
65.
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property.
66.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental
Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
R:~D P\00-0389 NASCAL Interplex, Inc~Staff Report.doc
17
73.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or
money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
74.
Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria
shall be observed:
Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through undersidewalk drains.
75.
The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with
applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
76.
Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive
approaches and storm drain facilities
77.
A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street
closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of
Public Works.
78.
The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
79.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
80.
The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object to
the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge and
Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed Western Bypass
Corridor in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall be subject to the
approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
81.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District
Eastern Municipal Water District
Department of Public Works
R:'~D P',00-0389 NASCAL Inte~plex, Inc~Staff Report.doc
18
82.
All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
83.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
OTHER AGENCIES
84.
Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control
letter dated September 15,2000,
85.
The applicant shall comply with the conditions set forth in the letter from the Department of
the Army Nationwide Permit Authorization dated November 9, 2000,
By placing my signature below; I confirm that I have read, understand, and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant Name
R:~D P\00-0389 NASCAL Interplex, Inc~Staff Reporl,doc
19
Lisa D, Herman
Csaba F. Ko
July 25, 2000
BY FACSIMILE TRANSMrrrAI.
(909) 694-6479
CITY OF Trc/~OJIA
Planning Department
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT:
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA00-0257; SPRINT PCS
TOWER ON MARGARITA ROAD
Dear Sir:
In accordance with the City of Temecula Development Review Comrnittee's
request in connection with the above subject application, please be advised
that the property in question is located within the boundaries of the
Rancho California Water District (RCWD).
Currently, RCWD is considering entering into a lease agreement with the
applicant, Sprint PCS/Cox Communications for the purpose of installing
cellular communications equipment at our reservoir site. RCWD's
conditions for a lease agreement would require that the Lessee meet the
following requirements:
The equipment be placed so as not to interfere with the current or
future use of this site, including RCWD's future plans to install
radio transmission equipment for the SCADA System (frequencies
must be compatible). RCWD's Operations Department requests that
a frequency interference study be performed at the expense of
Sprint PCS/Cox Communications to verify compatibility of
transmitting frequencies.
A separate power meter be obtained at the site from Southern
Califorrfia Edison (SCE).
A separate Telco connection be obtained at the site from GTE.
All necessary City permitting processes be obtained prior to
construction.
Any California Environmental Quality Control Act (CEO_A)
requirements be addressed and complied with.
Compliance to FCC regulations including new licensee filing of an
environmental assessment by September 1, 2000 if the equipment
has not been evaluated as in compliance with FCC electromagnetic
radiation guidelines for safe exposure.
Adjacent property owners be notified of the proposed facilities and
operations in accordance with the City of Temecuia's ordinance for
public hearing and notification.
City of Temecula
Page 2
July 25, 2000
Upon successful completion of the aforementioned requirements, and others,
construction of Sprint PCS/Cox Communications facilities will be allowed by RCWD.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, or if you need further clarification of
the items listed, please contact me.
Sincerely yours,
Paul J. Gon~dez~- ~ ]
General Services Manager
Enclosure
DAVID P. ZAPPE
General Manager-Chief Engit~eer
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
City of Temecula
Planning Department
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Attention:
Ladies and Gentlemen:
1995 MARKET STREET
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
909/955-1200
909/788-9965 FAX
51180.1
Re: ~ O0 - 05~
The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other and use cases n incorporated
cities. The District also does not plan check_, city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or
other flood hazard reports for sucn cases, uis~ct comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited
to items of specific ~nterest to the District including Oistdct Master Drainage Plan facilities other rag onal flood
control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical componenfor extension of a master plan system,
and Distdct Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is
provided.
The Distdct has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way
.con,s..titute.or ira. ply Distd~. approv, a! or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public
neann ann sarety or any omar SUCh issue:
This prgiect would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of
regional ~nterest proposed.
This. project in.voly..es ~strict Ma?er Plan facilities. The District will accept ownership of such faci ties on
written request of me ~Jity. Facilities must be constructed to District stanoards, and D strict plan check and
insp.ecti,on will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be
requlreo.
This p.roject proposes channels, s. torm drains. 36 inches or larger, in diameter, or other faci t es that could be
cons~oerad regional in nature an~vor a Iogica~ extension of the aoopted
Master Drainage Plan. The District woul~l consider accepting ownership of sucn tac~lit~es on wntten request
of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will
be required for District acceptance, plan check inspection and administrative fees will be required.
This project is located within the liroita of the District's - Area
D. reinage Plan for which .drainage fees have been adopte(3; applicable tees shoulo De pa~a Dy cashier's
check or money order omy to the Flood Control District pdor to issuance of building or grading permits
whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actua
permit.
GENERAL INFORMATION
This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water
_R.e`so. urce.s .Con.trol .B..oa.rd.: Clea. ran, c,e ro, r greding,.r ,ecordatio.n., or o~er fin.al ,approva/should not be given until the
uIty nas {3etermme(3 mat me projem nas caen grantee a permit or is ShOWn to ce exempt. . -
If this project inv..olves, a. Fedex! Em..erg.en,.cy Man.age`merit Age. ncy (FE.IVl.~.)mapped flood p a n, then the Cty shou d
require me applicant to p.rovi(~e au s~uoies~ calculations, pmns ano other reformat on re_ClU red to meet FEMA
requirements and should further .r~ui..re that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR)
prior to grad rig, recordation or omar nnal approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to
occupancy.
If a natum_l watercourse or mapped flood plai.n, is i..mp..acted b_.y this project, the, City should require the app. licant to
obtain a =action 1601/1603 Agreement from me ~Jalifomia uepartment of Fisn and Game and a Clean water Act
S .e~t. io.n 4..04 Permit. frero the..U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, o.r .written con'.e, spondence from these ag..encies
inoicating me project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean water Act Section 401 Water Muality Ce~ication
may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404
permit.
Very truly yours,
STUART E. MCKIBBIN
Senior Civil Engineer
Date: ~..Z. '
REPLY TO
Office of the Chief
Regulatory Branch
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
LOS ANGELES DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O BOX 532711
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90053.2325
November 9, 2000
Davidson and Allen Architects
c/o City of Temecula
Attention: Rolfe Preisendanz
Temecula Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:
It has come to our attention that you plan to construct a 28,000 square foot industrial
building (Case No. PA00-0389) located on the south side of Remington Avenue (Parcel 2 of
Parcel Map 24085-3) near the confluence of Murrieta Creek and Santa Gertrudis Creek in the
City of Temecula, Riverside County, California. This activity may require a U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers permit if the work will occur in our jurisdiction.
A Corps of Engineers permit is required for the discharge of dredged or fill material into,
including any redeposit of dredged material within, "waters of the United States" and adjacent
wetlands pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act of 1972. Examples include, but are not
limited to,
1. creating fills for residential or commercial development, placing bank protection,
temporary or permanent stockpiling of excavated material, building road crossings, backfilling
for utility line crossings and constructing outfall structures, dams, levees, groins, weirs, or other
structures;
2. mechanized landclearing, grading which involves filling low areas or land leveling,
ditching, channelizing and other excavation activities that would have the effect of destroying
or degrading waters of the United States;
3. allowing runoff or overflow from a contained land or water disposal area to re-enter a
water of the United States;
4. placing pilings when such placement has or would have the effect of a discharge of fill
material.
-2-
Thank you for the opportunity to review the project plans. If you have any questions,
please contact me at (213) 452-3418. Please refer to this letter and 200100187-SMS in your reply.
Sincerely,
Susan M. Sturges
Projec~ Manager
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
EXHIBITS
R:~D P\00-0389 NASCAL Interplex, Inc~Staff Report.doc
20
CITY OFTEMECULA
CASE NOS. - PA00-0389
EXHIBIT - A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- December 20, 2000
VICINITY MAP
R:\D P\00-0389 NASCAL Interpiex, Inc\Staff Report. doc
20
CITY OFTEMECULA
EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION -(LI) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION -(BP) BUSINESS PARK
CASE NOS. - PA00o0389
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - December 20, 2000
R:\D P\00-0389 NASCAL Interplex, Inc\Staff Report.doc
21
CITY OF TEMECULA
Site Plan
~z_ RJ~dlN~TON
CASE NO. - PA00-0389
EXHIBIT- D
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - December 20, 2000
SITE PLAN
R:\D P\00-0389 NASCAL Interplex, Inc\Staff Report.doc
22
CITY OFTEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA00-0389
EXHIBIT- E
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - December 20, 2000
GRADING PLAN
R:\D P\00-0389 NASCAL lnterplex, Inc\Staff Report.doc
23
CITY OF TEMECULA
- Exposed aggregate Type II
Paint
"Ford Reflective Blue" glass
& brushed aluminum storefront
Paintcolor#1
Paint color #2 -
- Recessed panels (typ)~ Paint color #1 ~
-- Paint color #2 ~
Paint color #1 ~
Paint color #1
Recessed panels (typ)
glass
& brashed aluminum storefront
CASE NO. - PA00-0389
EXHIBIT - F
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - December 20, 2000
ELEVATIONS
R:\D P\00-0389 NASCAL Interplex, Inc\Staff Report.doc
24
CITY OF TEMECULA
PAI~TI AL ELEVATION
CASE NO. - PA00-0389
EXHIBIT - G ELEVATIONS
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE -December 20, 2000
R:\D P\00-0389 NASCAL Interplex, Inc\Staff Report. doc
25
CITY OF TEMECULA
e®
CASE NO. - PA00-0389
EXHIBIT - H FLOOR PLANS
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE -December 20, 2000
R:\D P\00-0389 NASCAL Interplex, Inc\Staff Report.doc
26
CITY OF TEMECULA
Mezzanine Floor Plan
CASE NO. - PA00-0389
EXHIBIT - I
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE -December 20, 2000
FLOOR PLANS
R:\D P\00-0389 NASCAL Interplex, Inc\Staff Report. doc
27
CITY OF TEMECULA
I
/
/
!
CASE NO. - PA00-0389
EXHIBIT - J LANDSCAPE PLANS
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - December 20, 2000
R:\D P\00-0389 NASCAL Interplex, Inc\Staff Report.doc
28