HomeMy WebLinkAbout00_022 PC ResolutionPC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-022
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 98-
0309 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION OF A HOTEL ROOM ADDITION AND A MINOR
EXCEPTION TO THE PARKING STANDARDS, ON A PORTION OF
THE TEMECULA CREEK INN SITE LOCATED AT 44501
RAINBOW CANYON ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NO. 922-220-003, 004, 007 & 008.
WHEREAS, KSC Management, Inc, filed Planning Application No. 98-0309, in accordance
with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. 98-0309 was processed including, but not limited to
public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. 98-0309 on
June 7, 2000, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. 98-0309;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. FindinRs for a Development Plan. The Planning Commission, in approving
Planning Application No. 98-0309 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section
17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposal, a hotel addition and meeting room facility, is consistent with the land
use designation and policies reflected in the HTC & PR (Highway/Tourist Commemial & Public Park
& Recreation) land use standards in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development
standards for HT & PR (Highway/Tourist Commercial & Public Park & Recreation) contained in the
City's Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be
physically suitable for the type and density of commercial development proposed. The project, as
conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance,
including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines,
Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), the City's Water Efficient Landscaping
provisions, and fire and building codes.
B. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and
other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and safety
of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has
been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations
intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent
with the public health, safety and welfare.
R:~D P\98-309 Temecula Creek Inn~Staff report 309pa98.doc
7
Section 3. Findin.qs for Minor Exception. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning
Application No. 98-0309 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.03.060.D of
the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. That there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships created by strict
application of the code due to the physical characteristics of the property. The use of the site is
designed for a known user who has a parking need that is below the established standard based on
the needs of its multiple uses.
B. The minor exception does not grant special privileges which are not otherwise
available to surrounding properties and will not be detrimental to the public welfare or to the property
of other persons located in the vicinity. All other properties are entitled to request a reduction in the
parking standard within the stated limits and this request will not be detrimental to the public welfare
or to the property of others in the area.
C. The minor exception places suitable conditions on the property to protect surrounding
properties and does not permit uses which are not otherwise allowed in the zone. This property has
a known use with set operating conditions that determine their parking needs. The use of this
property is a mix of uses made of hotel rooms, a golf course, and a clubhouse, all of which are
appropriate for the zoning designation.
Section 4. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application
No. 00-0309 is made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill
Development Projects, Class 32). The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened
or rare species or their habitats, including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds.
The project site has been previously disturbed, graded, developed, turfed and landscaped. There
are no native species of plants, no unique, rare, threatened or endangered species of plants, no
native vegetation on or adjacent to the site. Further, there is no indication that any wildlife species
exist, or that the site serves as a migration corridor.
Section 5. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves Planning Application No. 98-0309 for a Development Plan to build and
operate a hotel suite with 48 guest's room and a new 6,253 square foot meeting room facility 44501
Rainbow Canyon Road, also known as Assessor's Parcel No. 922-220-003, 004,007, & 008, and
subject to the project specific conditions set forth in Exhibit A (Development Plan), attached hereto,
and incorporated herein by this reference.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of June, 2000.
Ron Guerrier~, ch~person
R:~D P~98-309 Temecula Creek Inn~Staff report 309pa98,doc
8
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 7th day of June, 2000
by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
ABSTAIN: 0
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
FAHEY, MATHEWSON, TELESIO,
WEBSTER, GUERRIERO
NONE
NONE
NONE
De~bie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:~D P~98-309 Temecula Creek Inn~Staff report 309pa98.doc
9
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
R:~D P',98-309 Temecula Creek Inn~Staff report 309pa98.doc
10
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OFAPPROVAL
Planning Application No. 98-0309 (Development Plan - Temecuia Creek Inn)
Project Description: A proposal for an addition to the Temecula Creek Inn for
a new 48 room hotel building and a new 6,253 square
foot meeting room facility at 44501 Rainbow Canyon
Road.
DIF Category:
Service Commercial
Assessor's Parcel No.:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
922-220-003, 004, 007, & 008
June 7, 2000
June 7, 2002
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1. The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of
seventy-eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the
Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and
California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour pedod the
applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason
of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
General Requirements
2. The perrnittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency
or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and
all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof,
or any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek
monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality
thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the
voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the
appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter
4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and
21167). The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or
proceeding brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the
defense of the action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require
additional deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused
portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either
promptly notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to
indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof,
or any of its officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the
required deposit, the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to
the applicant.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\USERPUBL\PLANNiNG\C.O.A. Apprvd Projects\309pa98 Temecula Creek Inn.doc
1
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "D"
(Site Plan), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning
Division.
Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "E" (Building
Elevations), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning
Division. All mechanical and roof-mounted equipment shall be hidden by building elements
that were designed for that purpose as an integral part of the building. When determined to
be necessary by the Planning Manager, the parapet will be raised to provide for this
screening.
Landscaping shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "F" (Landscape Plan).
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Manager. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Manager shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
The colors and materials for this project shall substantially conform to the following list of
approved colors and materials and with the Color and Material Board contained on file with
the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Any deviation from the
approved colors and materials shall require approval of the Planning Manager. (Amended
at Planning Commission Hearing 6/7/00)
Material
Wood siding
Fascia, railing & trims
Guestroom doors & accent trims
Stone accenting
Windows & sliding doors
Guestrooms Roofs
Meeting rooms Roofs
Color
Rehr Stains 505 Willow Mist (white)
Behr Stains 362 Navajo White (whitish green)
Dunn Edwards SP 2610 Saguaro (olive green)
Stone Veneer (light browns, tans, and beiges)
painted to match Rehr Stains 505 Willow Mist
C. oncrete roof tile to match existing guestrooms
Concrete roof tile to match existing clubhouse
8. During special events or times of high parking demand the operator of this facility shall use
valet parking or a comparable parking management plan that adequately meets the parking
needs. (Added at Planning Commission Hearing 6/7/00)
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
9. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one signed
set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files.
10. The applicant shall revise Exhibits "D, E & F", (Site Plan, Elevations, Landscape Plan, Color
and Material Board) to reflect the final Conditions of Approval and submit five (5) full size
copies.
11. The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color pdnts of the approved Color
and Materials Board and of the colored version of approved Exhibit "E", the colored
\\TEMEC_FSIOI\VOLI\USERPUBL\PLANNiNG\C.O.A. Apprvd Projects\309f~a98 Temecula Creek Inn.doc
2
architectural elevations to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for
their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on
the photographic prints.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
12. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
13. Three'(3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the
Community Development Department - Planning Division for approval. These plans shall
conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "F", or as amended by these conditions. The
location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The
plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify
the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be
accompanied by the following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved plan).
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
14. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the
approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning
Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation
system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
15. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Manager, to guarantee
the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction landscape
and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Community Development Department - Planning
Division for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping
and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Planning
Manager, the bond shall be released.
16. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility..The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in areand shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground,
or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-
street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously
stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for
persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense.
Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000."
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a'
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3
square feet in size.
17. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use ailowed
by this permit.
~\TEMEC_FS10%VOLI\USERPUBL\PLANNiNG\C.O.A, Apprvd Projects\309pa98 Temecula Creek Inn,doc
3
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
18. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan
all existing and proposed property lines; easements, traveled ways, improvement
constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further review and revision.
General Requirements
19. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site fiat work and
improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
20. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
21. All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent
projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on
standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
22. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
23. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property.
24. The .Developer shall post secudty and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject
to approval by the Department of Public Works.
25. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
26. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted
to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
27. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or pdvate
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and
identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect
the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities,
including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required
improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
28. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit.
29. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Planning Department
b. Department of Public Works
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\USERPUBL\PLANNING\C.O.A. Apprvd Projects\309pa98 Tenlecula Creek Inn.doc
4
30. The Developer shall comply with all constraints Which may be shown upon an Environmental
Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property.
31. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
32. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of
Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The following design criteria shall be observed:
a. FIowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
33. The Developer shall dedicate 22 feet of right-of-way on Rainbow Canyon Road, 11 feet on
each side, from Pechanga Creek to approximately 150 feet beyond Golf Club entrance.
34. The Developer shall provide on Rainbow Canyon Road a south bound 150-foot right turn
lane and a north bound 150-foot left turn lane at the Golf Club main entrance. The
improvements consist of asphalt paving, striping, and signage designed to meet Public
Works Standards. (Amended at Planning Commission Hearing 6/7/00)
35. All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions
per Caltrans' standards for transition to existing street sections.
36. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street
closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of
Public Works.
37. A Signing and Sthping Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved
by the Department of Public Works for Rainbow Canyon Road.
38. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
39. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy'
40. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
41. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805.
42. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City
standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
43. The existing improvements shall be' reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department
of Public Works.
\\TEMEC_FS101~VOLI\USERPUBL\PLANNiNG\C.O.A. Apprvd Projects\309pa98 Ternecula Creek Inn.doc
5
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
44.
All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of tl~e
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and
the Temecula Municipal Code.
45. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other
outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of
Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
46. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
47. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any
construction work.
48. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
49. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building is required. The
path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross
slope, travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California
Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
50. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations.
Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April
1, 1998)
51. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
52. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
53. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
54. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting,
fire alarm systems.
55. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. Provide an approved automatic fire
sprinkler system.
56. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans
submitted for plan review.
57. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing
schematic and mechanical plan for plan review.
58. Truss calcuJations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss
manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal.
59. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
60. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
61. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
62. Show all building setbacks.
\\TEMEC FS101kVOLI\USERPUBLkPLANNING\C.O.A. Apprvd Projects\309pa98 Temecula Creek Inn.doc
6
63.
Post conspicuously at the entrance to the project, the hours of construction as allowed
by City of Temecula Ordinance #0-90-04, and specifically Section G(1) of the Riverside
County Ordinance # 457.73, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied
residence.
Monday - Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Code Holidays
FIRE DEPARTMENT
64. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are
in force at the time of building plan submittal.
65. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-I. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM at
20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 700 GPM for a
total fire flow of 3200 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
dudng the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given
above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
66. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6"
x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent
public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 450 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be
located no more than 225 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access
road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent
hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC
903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
67. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the building(s) is in excess of
150 feet from a water supply on a public street, on site fire hydrants are required. For this
project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
68. Maximum cul..de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-
de-sac shall be forty-five (45) feet. (CFC 902.2.2.2.3 and Ord 460)
69. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
70. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
71. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather sudace designed for 80,000 lbs. GVVV with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet.
( CFC sec 902)
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\USERPUBL\PLANNiNG\C.O.A. Apprvd Project~09pa98 Temecula Creek Inn.doc
7
72. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (.13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
73. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a tumaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
74. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval pdor to installation. Plans shall be;
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards.
After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to
the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire
hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any
combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2
and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
75. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
76. Pdor to issuance of a Certificate Of Occupancy or building final, all commercial buildings shall
display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the building. The
numerals shall be minimum twelve (12) inches in height for buildings and six (6) inches for
suite identification on a contrasting background. In strip centers, businesses shall post the
suite address on the rear door(s). (CFC 901.4.4)
77. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a directory display
monument sign shall be required for apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile home
parks. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the complex which
indicates the name of the complex, all streets, building identification, unit numbers, and fire
hydrant locations within the complex. Location of the sign and design specifications shall be
submitted to and be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to installation.
78. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
79. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. {CFC Article 10)
80. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
to the right side of the main entrance door. The Knox-Box shall be supervised by the alarm
system. (CFC 902.4)
81. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
82. Pdor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant
shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the
storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both
the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3)
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\USERPUBL\PLANNING\C.O.A. Apprvd Projects\309Da98 Temecula Creek Inn.doc
8
OTHER AGENCIES
83. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water District's transmittal dated December 1, 1999, a copy of which is attached.
84. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Flood
Control's transmittal dated September 9, 1998, a copy of which is attached.
85. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside
Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated December 6, 1999, a copy of which
is attached.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
Apph"C. ant's Si(
'nunity .Develo~rnent Department approval.
nature Date
Name prJntecl
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\USERPUBL\PLANNiNG\C.O.A. Apprvd Projects\309pa98 Temecula Creek Inn.dec
9
· 1995 MARKET STRE~
DAVID P. ZAPPE , ?'~ RIVERSIDE, CA
General Manager.Oriel Engineer 909/275- t200
-909~788-9965 FAX
5H~o.L._
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
City of Temecula
Plannin(~ Deoartment
Post OffiCe Box 9033
Temecuta, Celifomia 92589-9033
Ladies and Genttemen: / Re: t0~ ~_
c~j..~s.Di~ect~.ctn~t~ormes~lnY~ ore~Oanmm.~e.n~ ~.~.n.d,~_o~s for land division~..or ..o~h.er/.aqd. use cases in incorporate~
.otb .er flood t~rcl moorts for s~:l~'~a's'~;.~IsC~c[a~r~m~mPma~d=~e.,,,Sl~t~ ~-u--~--s.~°n of Reel Estate
to items of · ,. . .. -?.,.,,,,--~,~,,maa,,,,,~uu,a lot aura cases are norm.am/IimRe~
s .p~cific mte....r~t, to the D,strict ,nctudin Dlst~ct Master ....
con . g . D · Plan facilities, other onal
troJ and drano · fac; ities which could be cons;de ·
and ' · ~ a log,cai comLn .r na~_ ._ .or extension of a masterr~o ~n em
pmvil~.'ct Area ~ra,nage Plan fees (development mitigatio~ fees). In addison, information of a gen~
~ne~orh~mS_n~o.t~.~.~e~a; ,, p .reposed.project In detail and the following ==ecl comments do not in any way
health and sa;,[-~[r any ottt~Psur°~ss~uee.-no0mement of the pmrx~ed project with respect to flood hazard, public
L,./" This pm. lect would not be impacted by Dis~ict Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of
regionm interest pmpeeed.
Th. is project Involves District Master Plan facil'ffies. The District will accept ownershiD of such facilities on
;~lu~dU.. m. ~ mqu;m~ ~; u;smc; acceptance. Plan crteck, inspection and administratwe fees will be
.~Th. In~d~_J~.r~o~P~n nCha~eel~d/stoOorna~ ideeirai~ 38~,=es o[. !.arger.in d' .~moter, er other facilities that could be
be re~uii~l for Dlsth ~'~'-~,i-4,~. ~.u .._~'2~a___~_?uam~, .and. ~ct ~ ctt...e~(, and ins .l~-'don will
-. ct acce~-.,~. ,..,=, u~=.~ ,nspection ano amnin;~ba~;ve tees will De require(3.
D~-~h~:~aiS' project is located within the limits of the District's Area
gor® mPloa~nwf°rom~chonlv~a~ f~e?_~h~_e___b~n. _.a.~.~.~; _al?p,ma~.~,e' tees snou~o ~0 pe,o oy cashiers
permits, whl;'::~,er com~- :~,~ =--[',-u~a~2'~---.~n~-Lu .=~ F o.r..~lty pno. r to_is~u.an..co.of budding or grading
ac~:Uel permit. ..... ~,, , ~o ~u I.~ palg ~TIOUIQ D~ ~ ~e I'~ In e~e~ a~ metime ot issuance of the
GENERAL INFORMATION
ThelS proJect_m~y reaulre a ~.,l~_tcaPof[.rUt~d~,s~j~,e_'c~a~ina~on.Sy~_' (NPDES)permit from the State Water
sources Control Board.
City has determined that the ---: ..... g,.. o.n., or omer ~ approval Should not be given until the
y, uj~n~ ,~ ~een gramea a pem~= or is shown to he exempt.
Ir~ui~rePmdeeet~ln~c~ ~oF~ed~d. de~ergst~i~es.Ma~_,a_g.?,_e~t__Ag~,~e~'Y (F .EMA} mapRed fl ..o~d plain, then the City should
uiremants an ' . ~, ~.~aaan~, ~ aha osier Inmrms;on r.~. uimd to meet FEMA
occupancy, p lect, one a Letter o1' Map ~evision (LOMR) prior to
Section 404 Pem~it from the=U.S ~;;J:.'"g..~'=-~_~,~_m_[a_ uel~u~rnanT, pt Hsn an; u.ame anp a Clean Water Am
indicating the nmiect Is exem,,* ~.,,7.; ,~'-'L~ ...y~.,..p_a_u_~_?g[n _e~rs.. o.r...whit.eh. _corr,.. ponoence from these agencies
may be requi~ 'f~m the I~i ';'~;;';~&;A-~-~-~u-~Le-'m'"e}~" a_u~ .~.. n ~vvat.er .R~ ~ .~tion 401 Water Quality Certffication
perm[ .~o,,,,~,,,,= r,~j~ona~ wa~er MUallty control uoara prior to issuance of the Corps 404
~.~__~ Very truly youm, ' ,
STUART E. MCKIBBIN
Senior Civil Engineer
Date:
aan o
Wafer
Csaba F. Ko
Ralph H, Daily
Lisa D. Herman
Doug Kulbe~
August 6, 1998
Thomas Thornsley, Case Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT:
WATER AVAILABILITY; A PORTION OF THE LITTLE
TEMECULA RANCHO; PORTION OF APN 922-220-003,
APN 922-220.007 AND APN 922-220-008;
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98.0309
Dear Mr. Thomsley: '
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within
the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water
service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial
arrangements between RCWD and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for
fees and requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing
an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to
RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
98/S8:n',cl 67/F012-T6/FCF
c: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor
TO:
FROM:
RE:
"- OF RIVf IS' .}E
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
CITY OF TEMECULA ~LANNTNG DEPARTMENT
Environmemal Health Specialist rrr
PLOT PLAN NO.
DATE: Au_~ust i0.
1. Thc D~p~.*,~t of EnvironmentallHcelth has revisited the Plot Plan No. PAgg-0309 and I~
objections. Sanitary sewer and wat? services may be available in this area.
2. PRIOR TO ANY PLAN clq~_.CK SUBMITTAL for health cl~rance, the following iten~
fll sexv¢ letters fi'om the appmpn~ wa~ and smn~ring agencies.
b) Thr~ complctc sets of plaits for each food '~blishment will be submitted, ~¢!uding a
schedule, a finish sch~ule, aml a plumbing schedule in order m ~nsu~ compliance with
California' Uniform Retail' FoOd Facilities Law. For specific r~fercnce, please contact
Facility Plan examiners at (909)i 694-5022.
¢) A ¢lcarance Ic'tt~r from thc H~ous $ct~rie. es Mamrials Ma--~gemcnt Branch (909) 694-5
will bc r~xtuix~l indicaling that te proj~t h~e be~n cleared for:.
· Underground storage t~ ,Drdin~c~ ~617.4.
· F/~7~rdous Waste GT_cmtotS~ Ordinance ff615.3.
· H~z~'dous Wast~ Disclosur~ (in accordance with Ordinance ff651.2).
· Waste reduc~on n~na~n~
3. Waste t~gulation Branch (Waste
CH:dr
(909) 955-8980
NOTE:
Any current ~ldifional
Plan review for final
cc: Doug Thompson
~ll~tion/LEA).
xtmr~ments not covered, can be applicable m time of Building
~. huent of Environmental Health ckmrancc.
EASTERN MUNICIPAL
WATER DISTRICT
Board of Director~
President
Richard R. Hall
~ce President
David J. Slawnon
Marion V. Ashley
Clayton A. Record. Jr.
Rocigcr D. $iems
Board SecretaO,
Mary C. White
General Manager
John B. Bmdin
Director of the
Dist~ct of So. Calif.
Chester C. Gilbert
Joseph J. Kuebler. CPA
Legal Counsel
August 27, 1998
City of Temecula
Planning Department
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589
Re: Temecula Creek Inn. Case No. 98.0309
Dear Sir.
The attached letter, relative to the above referenced project, is being provided for
your information.
Should you have any questions, please contact this office at (909) 928-3777, ext.
4467.
Sincerely,
Warren A. Back, P.E.
Civil Engineer
Customer Service
WAB:cl
C:
KCS Management
Paul Reed
533 Coast Blvd. South
La Jolla, CA 92037
attachment
2270Trumble Road Post Office Box 8300 Pen'is. CA
Board of Directori
Richartl R. Hall
David J. Slav.~on
Rodger D. Siems
Mary C. WMte
John B. Bru~ln
Director ot the
District ot So. Calif.
Chcsicr C. Gilbert
Jo~eon J. Kucbler. CPA
EASTERN MUNICIPAL
WATER DISTRICT
August 27, 1998
Larry Markham
41750 Winchester Road, Ste. N
Temecula, California 92590
Re: Rancho Villages Assessment District 159
Dear Mr. Markham:
Attempts have been made by the District to develop plans to mitigate up-front sewer-
system-construction cost for land development outside the Rancho Villages
Assessment District 159 (A.D.). Areas east of the A.D., previously assumed to
remain agricultural, are now requesting plans for sanitary sewer service. The District
must now consider the initial impact of sewer flow, from proposed development, and
rescind previous responsibility (described in correspondence dated January 5, 1998,
copy attached) to parallel the existing A.D. facilities.
Development of Assessment Distdct 159 properties is expected to occur quite rapidly
having infrastructure in place. Coupled with the increased development area,
previously assumecl to remain agricultural, sponsors of land development east of the
A.D. along Highway 79 South will require initial up-front developer funding to
construct necessary EMWD facilities.
Remaining capacity in the A.D. system, however, stands to be made available on a
first-come first-serve basis. Currently, the remaining capacity for the area east of the
A.D. along Highway 79 South is 216 EDU. Land development proposals, outside the
A.D. along Pala Road and Rainbow Canyon Road (e.g. Temecula Creek Inn), will be
considered with the area east of the ~,.D. along Highway 79 South, phase by phase
on a first-come first-serve basis. Currently, the remaining capacity for the entire area
outside the A.D. is 902 EDU. '
For planning purposes, the following is a summary to date of the anticipated EDUs
from all the known project areas outside the A.D.:
--, Trurnble Road Po~,t Office Box,S300 Pern~,. CA ~ ~ -"" '
l.~rry Markham
Rancho Villages A.D. 159
August 27, 1998
Page 2
Location and/or Name
Along HWY79S east of A.D. 159
Agricultural Area East of HWY79S Highpoint Communities
PDC Multi-Use Entertainment Site
Pechanga Reservation
Rainbow Canyon Heights (or Road)
Roseker ~
Jededia ~
Chimisal
Proposed EDU
1400
Estimated 1500 to 1600 EDU
300 plus 366
25O
320
1228 minus A.D. included 317
366
216'
*May include Some of Highpoint Communities' proposed 1500 to 1600 EDU.
Please be advised that development exceeding the 902 EDU will require further study of the
downstream 27-inch and 30-inch interceptor sewers and New Pala Lift Station. The studies will be
necessary to examine possible expansion requirements, as the A.D. reaches ultimate capacity. A
report prepared by Robert Rein, William Frost & Associates describes Revision to the Master Sewer
Study for The Pala Road Truck Sewer, dated May 1998. For development outside A.D. 159 along
PaJa Road, the report describes neeaecl Capacity increases to the A.D. 159 sanitary sewer system.
After discussions with EMWD, the report acknowledges the need to study the 27-inch and 30-inch
diameter interceptor sewers, as well as, the New Pala Lift Station for expansion requirements.
Should there be any questions, please contact this office at (909) 928-3777, extension 4467.
Sincerely,
Warren A. Rack
Civil Engineer
Customer Service Department
attachment
WAR/
C:
Rill Green
RBF
27555 Ynez Road, Ste. 400
Temecula, California 92591-4679
Steve Ludwig
Highpoint Communities
17341 Irvine Rival., Ste. 200
Tustin, California 92780
J:tWOR DPRO C~WP~NEW_BUSi. 11 ~WA B~AVAILWIAR KHAM. 1
~anuar~ $, 1998
Larry. R. Markham
41750 Winchester Road, Ste. L
Temecula, California 92590
SUBJECT: Amended Plan of Sanitam,. Sewer Service for property, located a/ong Highway
79 South east of A.D. 159
Dear Mr. Markham:
~_T~.'_sje.~t,er ,a[n. end, s..8 .amta~ s__mver sermce eondk, ons, previously described in corres ondence
ua~¢t~ Jmy ~ ann reemary 2~, 1997 co ies · P
( P attached), for proper.es located along Highway 79
South east of A.D. 159. Sewer system improvements for development in excess of the shared
216 EDU (required to parallel the ~xisting A.D. 159 Sewer System) will now be the responsibility
of the District. Properties located outside the A.D. 159 will ~ow be required to pay only the cost
associated with: local sewer system improvements; related charges, deposits, and fees; and
annexation to the Dish'ict's existing U-8 Improvemen~ District.
Local sewer system improvements and related charges, deposits, and fees
Local sewer system improvements include those faOlities necessary, to provide sanlta.,5, sewer
service to each and eve~ lot and those facilities n~essary to sewer the area to the A.D. 159
Sewer System. The facilities considered necessary to sewer the area to the A.D. 159 Sewer
System are as follows:
* 15-inch diameter gravity sewer pipeline from Temecula Creek Road to Burterfield
Stage Road; and
* 12-inch diameter gravity sewer pipeline from Anza Road to Tememla Creek Road.
Sewer Backup and Sewer Treatment Capacity Charge (i.e., connection fee) will be applied on a
per 12DU (equivalent dwelling un/t) bases and will not require payment until ocCUpancy.. The area
will be assessed I F_.DU per single family residem or multiple F.~Us for other uses. This charge is
Mail to: Post Office Box 8500 ~ * San/acinso, California
Main Office: 2045 S. San ]acinto Avenue. San z__- 92581-8500 * Telephone (~09) 925-7676 * Fax (909) 929-0257
per:nons ~ Maintenance Ccntcr: 22.70 Tt---g;- ~--~ n Customer Se~ce / ~gincering Annex: 440 ...... ~ ~uaa, . ems. ~ 92571 *
January. 5, 1998
Page 2 :
currently $3,845/EDU.
Where facilities COnstructed by the sponsor of a particular project within the area fiont other
properties yet to pay their fiontages, the sponsor will be reimbursed in the amount offiontage
collected fiom those properties by EMWD, pursuant to standard reimbursement period often
years be_~ming fiom the date ·
of the cormrucuon agreement with the sponsor.
Facilities oversized by the sponsor will be eligible for reimbursement. The amount of
reimbursement will determined at the time the sponsor makes agreement with FaMWD to
construct.
Other rela~ed deposits and fees to be considered for estimating purposes include:
· Deposit of $2000 for 10 or more sheets for ElVlWD plan check eng/nearing;
· Deposit of 10% of EMW'D Estimated/.nstallation Cost for ~ inspection
engineering;
· Fee of $10/lot processing for Occupancy Release requests;
· Fee of $13$/sheet for EMWD engineering As-Builts; and
· $15/F, neal foot of project fiontage along lmblie road way where sewer pipeline will
be required in the future.
Please note, these charges, deposits, fees, and reimbursement amounts are subject to review and
change by ~ Board of Directors.
Annexation
Annexation to the District's existing U-8 Improvement District, will be necessary. Most of the
cost associated with annexation of Tentative Tract Maps 26134 and 26132, portions of Parcel
Map 12460 and Parcel Map 7670 will be approximately $11,000. For exact determination of this
cost the following process must be completed:
1) Pay required $100 processing fee and request for annexation;
2) Petition with calculated annexation fees sent to legal owners for approving
3) E/VlWD Resolution to adopt and approve requested annexation.
Should you have any further questions, please contact me at (909) 766-t810, extension 4467.
Sincerely,
en A. Back
Civil Engineer
Customer Service Dbpartment
attachments
l_srry Markham
Rancho Villages A.D. 159
August 27, 1998
Page 3
Dennis W. Chiniaeff, AICP
27555 Ynez Road
Suite 407
~emecula, CA 92591
February 25, 1997
41750 Winchester a~ad, Ste. L
Temecula, Callfo.-nla 92590
SUBJECT: Sewer Service ~oArma East of A.D. I59
The A.D. 159 Sewer System was
financial commitments ,_ Plied
bo~daries, however ..k~_ sewer .teas east of
fol!owin, shall ~- -~ u~n conslder~e
The A.D. 159 Sewer Syst~ was sized wi~ consider ·
~reas outside of ~e A.D. lS9 b----~--, aClon for some
oewer Syst~. ~ su~, ~e D~les to sewer to ~e A.D. 159
~=~lc= offers t-mporary se~ica
future review, on a Pro'eeC ~- ~~C~ell~ ~ts. ~ an
verify ~e r~ 9nn ~_.=_~ pro, eot bas!s,
D~sCric= =eco=en~~ s~_=~~ os .Oased on ocher
· .~=:~s wl~ ~o belated s~rises.*~== co ~lc!qate all the sewer
Should you have any questions,
extension 4467.
Sincere!y,
please contact me at (909) 766-1810,
Warren A. Back, P.E.
~ivi! Engineer
~ustomer Service Depar~aent
~A~/
:c: K. Crew, t~**D -
~asr O~'fice 8oz 8.~00 ' 0S~ -fag~nto. C~;t'o * . ' *
}cc: 104~ S. San Jacinzo Avenue. S~ r._. rrna 92~81 ~300 · T~ephone (909) 925-7676 · F~ (909) 929.02~7
. -- 0 ,.-,.o~e aoaa. :'cms. ~& 92~71 ·
July 15, 1997
Larry R. Markham
41750 Winchester Road, Ste. L
Temecula, California 92590
~um,.TECT: Sewer Pl~ of Se~£ce for~ro~ertTlocatad along~ighway
79 South east of A.D.
Dear Mr. Markham:
Pursuant to your request for a plan of sewer se_~zice for properties
located along Highway 79 Sou~h east of A.D. 159, the District
offers the following infor~tlon. As mentioned previously in our
February 25, 1997 letter (copy attached), the A.D.
159 Sewer System
was sized with consideration for some areas outside of the A.D.
boundaries to sewer through the A.D.
District offered ~--,o----- 159 Sewer System. The
.... ~. ~=~ sewer service for those areas on a first
A discussion with the County of Riverside on July 9, 1997,
confirmed t_he Southwest Area Community Plan, daued November 28,
1989, as t_he most c~rrent docamant. County staff do not anticipate
The SWAP bein~ a~ended with an,, si--=~= - - .
fuEure. As such ruin _~=_. = . ¥~zcanu changes in the near
· ~ , .~-..~_=u~-es s=rlct!y to the present land use
plan and consluers ~_~3_h to 10 acre minimum sized arce~s ea
A.D. 159 to not request P - st of
gravity sewer pipeline service. The ~-4
DU/acre land use area along Highway 79
South east of A.D. 159 on
the other hand shall be progra~ed to receive gravity pipeline
service. Please refer to the attached excerpt of the SWAP.
Seventy-~wo acres along E1 Chimisal Road, located just outside the
A.D. 159 boundary, has already been conside-ed i
Sewer System design for sewer' ~,~ ..... - n the A.D. 159
indicated in the SWAP a- ~= ------~=' 'rn;s area is currently
~,= ~,=, ~e ~as=er Sewer Study for .... Predating
t_he A.D has considered this 72
acres having a density of 3 DU/acre. The District shall allow the
area along Highway 79 South east of A.D. 159 to share the 72 acre's
Post Office Box 8:;00 ' ~ S~a ]acinto. C~i~'orni~ 92~81-8500 .
O~c:: 2~45 5. San hcin~o Avenue. San ]acm~o , Cu~ame~ %~..; Teleohone (909) 92~-7676 ~ (909} 929-0257
'::mas , ' - , ~- ......... ~n~e, ng Aan~: 440 E. O~aad Avenue. Hemer. C%
" - mDle Road. , err:s. ~ 9~s~
Larry Markham
A.D. 159
July 15, 1997
Page 2
216 Equivalent Dwelling Units on a first come
This. shall be accomp, l{shed with construction
gravity sewer Pipeline in Highway 79 South:
first serve basis.
of the following
15-inch d/ameter -r ....
~ avl=y sewer pipeline from Temecula
Creek Road to But=erfield Stage Road.
~2-inch d/~meter gravity sewer pipeline from Anza Road to
emecula Creek Road.
Development of these two
· r
sewer system Imp ovements.
areas beyond the 116 EDU will require
Sewer System Improvements
~h~14;i~Ju~e~e~o~n~D~l~pb.~necessary to sewer areas along
excess of the shared 216 EDU.
* Appro~imate!y 18,500 feet of iS-in ·
pipe!lne shall be c- ...... ~ _ _ ch diameter gravity sewer
sewer. ~-=~ -~ uou=n sewer and Pale Road
* Approximately 3,800 "
u-~u=ueu :rom the in=ers ·
Highway 79 South sewer ..... _ectlon of t_he
..... . ~u ~a~a Koad sewer to the A.D. 159
u%ft ~=a=lon (1.e. New Pala Lift Sta ' ·
plpe!lne shall re~i-~ ~--~ - t~on). A 9ortlon of this
for at east the °re .ethod of const=c=io
South. ----w ua ~ne I-iS Freeway ~d Highway 79
The.307inch_di~eter gravity sewe~ Pipeline shpll, remain.to be an
esc~mace of the needed s~ze to
~eve!opment plans are fi~-~_-_ P.a~.~lle exlstlng sewer ~ntil
corporation. ~_ _, .-~=~ =~ wlr.~ the ~echanga De~e!opment
developer to =g = oses the O strict advises the
~=a ~qe Cost of the
along with t_he District, s f~ .... :_, aforementioned facilities
· *~u=aa participation charge program.
The current flna~cial participation char ·
~omp_ reimbursement or Cred'- ~ .... ge_ program provides for
facilities. 1. ~u~ =ne cons=ruction of oversized
Please be advised the proposed ro'e ~ ·
servlce are contingent u-on -~/~=-~. ~erv_lce. The provisions of
status of t_he Dis~,.,_~__ ~= uzmlng o~ =he SLLbject Dro~ec~ ~
~ ---~ ~ ~-"'mzt to operate. - ~- ....
Larry Markham
A.D. 159
July 15, 1997
Paqe 3
Should you have any q~lestions,
766-1822.
Sincerely,
Warren A.~
Civil Engineer
Customer Se_~zice De.mart~ent.
attachments
please con~ac=
~his office a~ (909)
~OMMUNITY PAR#