HomeMy WebLinkAbout99_030 PC ResolutionPC RESOLUTION NO.99-030
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-
0301 TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A TWO-STORY, 50,100
SQUARE FOOT SPECULATIVE OFFICE BUILDING AND
ASSOCIATED PARKING, AND LANDSCAPING ON A PARCEL
CONTAINING A 3.05 (NET) ACRES LOCATED ON THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE AND RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 940-
310-029.
WHEREAS, John F. Firestone filed Planning Application No. PA99-0301 in accordance with
the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA99-0301 was processed in the time and manner
prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission. considered Planning Application No. PA98-0386 on
November 18, 1998, and Planning Application PA99-301on August 18, 1999 at a duly noticed public
hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either
in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating
to Planning Application No. PA99-0301;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
Section 2. Findin,qs. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No.
PA99-0301 makes the following findings; to wit:
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and
with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The project is
consistent with all City Ordinances including: the City's Development Code, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt.
Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety and welfare. The project as proposed complies with all City Ordinances and
meets the standards adopted by the City of Temecula designed for the protection of the public
health, safety and welfare.
C. The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare
species or their habitats, or to wildlife dispersal or migration corridors, The project site has been
previously disturbed and graded, and streetscape installed on site. There are no native species of
plants or vegetation at the site, nor any indication that any wildlife species exist, or that the site
serves as a migration corridor. A DeMinimus impact finding can be made for this project.
F:\DEPTS~PLANNING~STAFFRFF~301PA99PC-MEM.d~c
4
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study was prepared for the previously
approved project (PA99-0386), which indicated that although the proposed project could have a
significant impact on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the
mitigation measures described in the Conditions of Approval were added to the project. The revised
project, PA99-0301, was reduced in square footage and impacts are determined to be similar or less
than what was previously analyzed environmental impact; therefore, no additional environmental
analysis is required.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves
Planning Application No. PA99-0301 for the design and construction of a two-story, 50,100 square
foot speculative office building with associated parking and landscaping on a parcel containing 3.05
acres located on the southeast comer of Ridge Park Drive and Rancho California Road, and known
as Assessor's Parcel No. 940-310-029 subject to Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated
herein by this reference and made a part hereof.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of August, 1999.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting there of, held on the 18th day of August,
1999 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
GUERRIERO, FAHEY, MATHEWSON,
NAGGAR, WEBSTER
NONE
NONE
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
F:~Dop~\PLANNING~STAFFRFI~01PA99PC-MEM.doc
5