HomeMy WebLinkAbout99_050 PC ResolutionPC RESOLUTION NO. 99-050
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL BY THE CITY
COUNCIL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0243 FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 29286 FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF 9.75
ACRES INTO 38 RESIDENTIAL LOTS LOCATED ON THE EAST
SiDE OF MARGARITA ROAD AT THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 911-640-003.
WHEREAS, Lennar Communities filed Planning Application No. PA99-0243 (Tentative Tract
Map No. 29286) in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development Code and
Riverside County Land Use and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA99-0243 (Tentative Tract Map No. 29286) was
processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State
and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA99-0243
(Tentative Tract Map No. 29386) on December 8, 1999, at a duly noticed public hearing as
prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and
did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission considered all facts relating to Planning Application No. PA99-0243
(Tentative Tract Map No. 29286);
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
by reference.
That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated
Section 2. Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission, in approving Planning
Application No. PA99-0243 (Tentative Tract Map No. 29286), hereby makes the following findings
as required in Section 7.1 of County Ordinance No. 460.
A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision is
consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable specific plan and the City of
Temecula Municipal Code. The project is compatible with the existing General Plan Land Use
Designation and zoning standards of Low Medium Density Residential. Tentative Tract Map No.
29286 proposes thirty eight (38) residential lots which comply with the minimum average net lot
size requirement of 7,200 Square feet and the unit density of 3-6 units per acre.
B. The tentative map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract
entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a
Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too
small to sustain their agricultural use. The subject site is not part of the California Land
Conservation Act of 1965 or any conservation contract. All proposed parcels are for residential
home sites and comply with the Low Medium (LM) Density standards and requirements of the
Development Code and General Plan.
R:~T M\243pa99 (TM 29286)\243pa99.PC.doc
20
C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development
proposed by the tentative map. The project is compatible with the existing General Plan Land Use
Designation and zoning standards of Low Medium Density Residential. Tentative Tract Map No.
29286 proposes thirty eight (38) residential lots which comply with the minimum average net lot size
requirement of 7,200 square feet and the unit density of 3-6 units per acre. The proposed
subdivision is being developed below the General Plan and Development Code target density of 4.5
dwelling units per acre, with a density of 3.9 dwelling unit per acre. Thus, the subject site is suitable
to accommodate the proposed density.
D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions
of approval, are either:
a. Not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure
fish or wildlife or their habitat; or
b. An environmental impact report has been prepared and a finding has been made,
pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a) (3), finding that specific economic,
social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation measures or project
alternatives identified in the environmental impact report;
An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project could
have a significant impact on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case
because the mitigation measures described in the Mitigation Monitoring Program and the Conditions
of Approval that have been added to the project. Therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration will
be adopted.
E. The design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements is not likely to
cause serious public health problems. The project has been reviewed for conformance with the
City's General Plan, Development Code and Subdivision. The project proposes one street access
from Margarita Road that is restricted to right-in, right-out only. The project is consistent with these
documents and conditions of approval have been placed on the project accordingly to assure that
the development conforms to City Standards. Therefore, cause serious public health problems are
not likely to occur as a result of the proposed subdivision.
F The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling
opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The future single family homes will have roofs
that can accommodate solar panels to permit future passive or natural heating or cooling
opportunities.
G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed
subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those
previously acquired by the public will be provided. The project will take direct access from Margarita
Road and will not obstruct any easements.
H. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements
(Quimby). The project is conditioned to satisfy the City's parkland dedication requirement through
the payment of an in-lieu fee equivalent to the dedication of .49 acres of land. The fee shall be
calculated by multiplying the required amount of parkland by the City's then current appraised land
valuation as established by the City Manager.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates
that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures deschbed in the Conditions of
Approval have been added to the project, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby
adopted.
R:'~STAFFRPT\243pa99.i~C.doc
21
Section 4. The City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of
Planning Application No. PA99-0243 (Tentative Tract Map No. 29286) and recommends that the City
Council do the following:
A. Approve a Resolution entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of
Temecula approving Planning Application PA99-0243 for Tentative Tract No. 29286 for the
sbudivision of 9.75 acres into 38 residential lots for the property located on the east side of
Margarita Road at the northern City limit and known as Assessor's Parcel Number 911-640-003"
substantially in the form that is attached to this resolution as Exhibit A;
Section 5 Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission conditionally
hereby approves Planning Application No. PA99-0243 (Tentative Tract Map No. 29286) for the
subdivision of a 9.75 acres into 38 residential parcels located on the east side of Margarita Road at
the northern City limit and known as Assessor's Parcel Number 911-640-003, subject to the project
specific conditions set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference,
for the property.
Section 6 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8t~/)day of December, 1999.
Ron G~ e rrie ro F'~".h~ai rp e rs o n
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 8th day of December,
1999 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES: 4
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
FAHEY, GUERRIERO, MATHEWSON,
WEBSTER
NOES:
0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: 0
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NONE
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\STAFFRIYr~43pa99 .PC .doc
22