HomeMy WebLinkAbout99_052 PC ResolutionPC RESOLUTION NO. 99-052
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA99-0378 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT) FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION
OF A 12,826 SQUARE SATURN AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP ON
2.61 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD,
APPROXIMATELY 1,200 FEET SOUTH OF SOLANA WAY, AND
ALSO IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP 28809
WHEREAS, Saturn Corporation filed Planning Application No. PA99-03789 (the
"Application") in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development
Code;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed, including but not limited to a public notice, in
the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting on December 15, 1999,
considered the Application at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the
City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in
opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission approved the Application subject to conditions after finding that the
project proposed in the Application conforms to the City of Temecula General Plan and
Development Code;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section t. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. Development Plan Findin.qs. That the Planning Commission, in approving the
Application hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010.F of the Temecula
Municipal Code:
A. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for SC
Service Commercial development in the City of Temecula General Plan, and the standards for SC
Service Commercial development contained in the City's Development Code. The site is therefore
properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of
development proposed. The project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable
requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), the CityWide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes.
B. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation,
entry features and other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect
the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for and
as conditioned has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards
R:\Griffins~378PA99.Saturn Staff Report.doc
8
and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a
manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare.
C. The design of the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There
is no fish wildlife or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish wildlife or
habitat off-site. The project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife
resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code.
Section 3. Conditional Use Permit Findin.qs. That the Temecula Planning Commission, in
approving the Application hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.04.010.E of
the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposal as conditioned is consistent with the land use designation and policies
reflected for SC Service Commercial development in the City of Temecula General Plan, and the
standards for SC Service Commercial contained in the City's Development Code.
B. The proposal as conditioned is consistent with the nature, condition and development
of adjacent uses and has been designed in a manner so as to ensure that this use will not have an
adverse affect on adjacent uses, buildings or structures.
C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the overall design of the project, including the yards, parking, circulation, loading
facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other associated site improvements prescribed in the
Development Code and required by the Planning Commission in order to integrate the use with
other uses in the neighborhood.
D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is generally consistent with surrounding
uses, and has been designed and conditioned in a manner to protect potentially sensitive land uses
to the east and south of the site, and will therefore not be detrimental to the health, safety and
general welfare of the community.
E. The decision to approve the application for the conditional use permit is based on
substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole, including the plans, exhibits, documentation
and staff report and recommendation presented to and considered by the Planning Commission at
the time of their decision.
Section 4. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption has been adopted for the
Application per the California Environmental Act Guidelines Section 15061 and 15332. These
Sections allow exemptions for in-fill development projects that meet certain prescribed criteria. The
subject site and development complies with these criteria and therefore the exemption can be
applied to this project.
Section 5. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves the Application for the design, construction and operation cfa 12,825 square
Saturn automobile dealership on 2.61 acres located on the east side of Ynez Road, approximately
1,200 feet south of Solana Way, and also identified as Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 28809, subject to the
project specific conditions set forth on Exhibit A (Development Plan), and Exhibit B (Conditional Use
Permit), attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference.
R:\Griffins~378PA99.Saturn Staff Report.doc
9
Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15 day of December, 1999.
Ron Gderriero,'i~h~irperson
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at its regular meeting thereof, held on the 15th day of
December, 1999 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
4 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: FAHEY, GUERRIERO, MATHEWSON,
WEBSTER
0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NONE
0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NONE
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\Griffins',378PA99.Saturn Staff Report,doc
10