Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout040992 CC/PRC Jnt. AgendaAn~NDA TE~ECULA CITY COUNCIL AN AD, OURNED REGULAR MEETING TO BE HELD JOINTLY WITH THE TEMECULA PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION TEMECULA CITY HALL, MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM - 43174 BUSINESS EARK DRIVE APRIL 9, 1992 - 7:00 PM Governmeet Code Sealira 5495').9 to d!ec-s, .4entCr: i~gation ....... CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Patricia H. Birdsall Rag Salute: Chairperson Evelyn Harker ROLL CALL: COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks Birdsall COMMISSIONERS: Hillin, Kirby, Nimeshein, Walker, Harker PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed on the Agenda or on the consent Calendar, a pink "Request To Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items a "Request To Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. COUNCIL BUSINESS Introductions - Community Services Director Shawn Nelson 2 Project Historv 2.1 Master Plan 2.2 Project committee meetings 2.3 Program consensus 21egende/101011 I 04/03/82 3 4 5 6 7 8 Schedule 3.1 Updated Schedule Resource Documentation. qoals and Objectives, Site Issues Review 4.1 · Site Context 4.2 Goals and Objectives 4.3 Site Issues Site Analysis 5.1 Opportunities and Constraints City Park and Recreation Master Plan Facilities S~Jrvey Data Review 6.1 Rating of Facility Needs 6.2 Facilities Desired in the City 6.3 Teen Survey Site 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 Hydrology Study Results Site Plan Alternatives Site Character and Atmosphere Proposed Site Plan Community Recreation Center Facilities 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 Building Program Building Character and Atmosphere Pool Program Amphitheater Program 9 Projected Budget 10 Questions and Answers CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY COUNCIL REPORTS COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular City Council meeting: April 14, 1992, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. 21egendd 1010g I 2 04/03/82 RANCHO CALIFORNIA SPORTS PARK GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The Project: 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. The Sports Park - A Focal Point of City The Community Center Should Function as a Multi-Purpose Facility (Including Youth and Seniors) Develop a Flexible Pool Program to Cater to Learning and Competition Emphasize Education in All Community Center Programs Establish a Teen Program for Young Adults (Ages 13-18) Identify Revenue Generating Opportunities Provide for Adequate Maintenance, Signage, and Security Emphasize Volunteerism and Donations Park Facilities Should Cater to "All" User Needs Provide for a Trail Head/Staging Area for Trails System Expand Upon Opportunities Associated with the Creek and Pond Areas Provide Bike Trail Along Rancho Vista Road Interconnect Community and Regional Trails/Develop "Loop" Systems Provide a Variety of Trail Opportunities (Bicycle, Hiking, Etc.) Minimize Environmental Impact and Heighten Environmental Awareness Safety First, Recreation Second Improve Disabled Services RANCHO CALIFORNIA SPORTS PARK CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA ISSUES (SITE RELATED) 1. Highest Reason for Non-Use of Park Facilities: · Not Enough Facilities · Programs and Facilities - Not Available · Programs and Facilities - Not Convenient 2. Heaviest Park Use is Active, Yet Non-Organized Activity 3. Heaviest Organized Need Orients Around Teens and a Pool 4. Provide Connections to Regional Trail Systems 5. Disposition of the 52 Acres of Open Space Along Pauba Road 6. Analyze Hydrology of Area to Determine Impact on Site ISSUES (SITE SPECIFIC) 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 10. Rancho California Sports Park is the Heaviest Used Park in the City Provide Adequate Staffing in Operations with an Emphasis on Volunteers Need for Strict Rules for Parks (i.e., Glass, Alcohol, Etc.) Need for Good Trail Signage Existing Incised Creek May Require Stabilization - Balance with Federal Regulations Top Soil is Alluvium - Good for Landscape, but Will Require Removal From 7 to 11 Feet at Structure Locations Structures Must Be Sited Out of 100 Year Flood Plain Disposition/Maintenance of Existing Detention Pond Observe Development Restrictions with Respect to the Existing MWD and Southern California Gas Company Easements Consider Adjacent Land Uses With Respect to Noise, Lighting, and Security EXHIBIT I~TING OF FACIUTY NEEDS IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA Type of Facility Average Rating Percent of Resoondents Indicating High or Moderate Need No Need Biking/Jogging/Nature Trails Swimming Pool - Recreation 2.32 2.28 2.18 2.16 Bandshell/Outdoor Concert Stage 2.07 Swimming Pool - Competitive Events 2.04 Tennis Courts 1.95 Basketball Courts 1.85 Soccer/Football Fields - Organized Games 1.76 Lighted Softball Fields 1.69 Soccer/Football Fields - Practice 1.68 Classes such as Tennis, Golf, Dog, Obedience 1.68 Racquetball/Nandball 1.56 Horseback Riding Trails 1.56 Campsites 1.54 Urdighted Softball/Baseball Fields 1.49 City Sponsored Trips/Tours 1.45 Golf Driving Range 1.22 Archery 1.07 Golf Course 0.99 Lawn Bowling/Croquet 0.93 Indoor Teen and Youth Club Facilities 2.39 Recreation Center for Classes 2.14 Senior Programs 2,11 Senior Facilities ' 2.09 Classes such as Dance, Crafts, Gymnastics 1.98 Auditorium 1,96 Theatrical Arts 1,91 Cultural Arts Center 1.89 Meeting Facilities 1.78 Indoor Racquetball/Handball 1.51 ~;ource: Telephone survey conducted by The Research Network, Lid., September 83.4% 10.8 83.1 12.1 78.2 15.3 77.4 14.0 73.4 13.6 73.9 13.8 74.1 17.1 68.1 18.0 65.4 20.5 60.5 24.0 62.0 .22.1 61.5 21.6 57.4 22.8 55.5 24.6 53.7 25.9 54.3 29.1 50.4 26.3 39.9 36.4 30.6 33.8 29.6 43.0 25.3 42.0 85.1 9.3 77.g 14.8 76.6 13.7 75.7 14.1 73.2 14.0 70.7 16.5 70.6 14.3 68.3 15.4 63.9 18.4 51.9 22.5 8-27,1991. EXHIBIT "C" RESULTS OF TEEN SURVEY Ages of Teen's Surveyed A. Age 13 - 4 B. Age 14 - 3 C. Age 15 - 17 D. Ages 16 - 19 E. Age 17 - 36 F. Age 18 - ~, G. Age 19 - 2 81 Types of Recreation Programs Desired A. Dance 39 B. Sports 34 C. Bands 19 D. Field Trips 8 E. Exercise Room/ - 7 Dance Room F. Food - 6 G. Drama - 6 H. Arl:s . d, I. Gymnastics - 2 J. Drug & Alcohol - 2 Awareness K. Tournaments 2 L. D.J. 2 M. Amateur Night 1 N. Dance Contest 1 O. Hang Out 1 P. Singing/Choir 1 Q. Pizza Par~y - 1 R. Movie Night - 1 S. Hot Lines - 1 T. Roll Playing - 1 U. Camping - 1 V. Career Night - 1 W. Modeling 1 Would you be able to attend the teen center if it wasn't close to your home or school? Yes 60 No. 8 If a teen center was available with programs and activities that you liked, would you attend? Yes 65 No 0 Types of Equipment Desired A. Pool Tables 41 Bo Stereo 21 C. Video Games 21 D. Ping Pong 12 E. Miniature Golf 7 F. Bean Bags 4 G. T.V. 3 H. Skating - 4 I. Roller Skate 2 J. Ice Skate 2 K. Malibu Grand Prix - · 2 L. Air Hockey - 4 M. Couches ' - 2 N. Paints - 2 O. Juke Box - 1 P. Weights - 2 Desired hours of operation A. Weekdays majority said after school to 9:00 p.m. B. Weekends (Friday- Saturday) - 3:00 p.m. until 12 midnight Volunteer's 67 - Teenagers RJM DESIGN GROUP, INC. PLANNING AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE March 12, 1992 RANCHO CALIFORNIA SPORTS PARK CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA PHONE MEMORANDUM RE: Southern California Gas Easement Restrictions - Conversation with Mr. Richard lllingworth - Pipeline Planner A. Existing Conditions: 3 Lines within easement · 16" high pressure gas line · 24" high pressure gas line · 30" high pressure gas line B. Restrictions: Poles for signage to be located outside of the easement Minimum 3' of cover over pipelines Maximum 7' of cover over pipelines Shallow rooted trees and shrubs within easement only No structures as defined in letter dated April 23, 1991 Roadway, parking and grading allowed within restriction parameters. Road/parking base preparation may occur to within I' of cover over pipes. D. Suggested Procedure: Meeting with Gas Company and Design Team to discuss scope of work and proposals Pot hole per guidelines to reveal existing depth of pipes Work out agreement for amended right-of-way if necessary 27285 LAS RAMBLAS, SUITE 250 · MISSION VIEJO, CA 92891 * (714) 582-7516 * FAX (714) 582-0429 RANCHO CALIFORNIA SPORTS PARK RJM Design Group SCHEMATIC DESIGN SPACE ALLOTMENT SPACE ORIGINAL PROGRAM CURRENT DESIGN COMMENTS SQUARE FOOTAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE 300 300 DIRECTOR'S OFFICE MUL TIPURPOSE TEEN ROOM / GAME ROOM MEETING ROOM A MEETING ROOM B CRAFTS ROOM RECEPTION KITCHEN RESTROOMS STORAGE- GYM GYMNASIUM STAGE @ MUL TIPURPOSE SHOWER / LOCKER EMERG. PREP. STOR SNACK BAR / VENDING UTILITY / MECHANICAL POOL EQUIPMENT POOL CONTROL SUB TO TAL CIRCULATION ~TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE 200 3,400 1,500 340 680 300 1,000 750 700 600 8,000 1,000 2,500 300 200i 200i 500 260 22, 730 2,273 25,003 200 3,400 1,500 345 690 345 1,000 600i 540 ~ 600 8,460 1,000 2,900 300 240 200 400 300 23,320 2,780 26, 1 O0 3/26192 'Page I PROCLAMATIONS & PRESENTATIONS The City of Temecula PROCLAMATION ~, the week of the Young Child is an annual celebration that focuses public attention on the needs of young children and their families; and WHF. REAS, there is particularly a need for high quality early childhood programs; and ~EAS, the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAYEC) the country's largest organiTation of Early Childhood professionals sponsors this celebration; and ~, the goal of the week is to build pubBc understanding of the importance of early childhood programs in our society and to foster needed public support for these programs; NOW, THEREFOr, I, Patricia H. Birdsall, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecuia, hereby proclaim the week of April 19 through 26, 1992 to be: THE WEEK OF THE YOUNG CHILD in the City of Temecula, and encourage the community to participate in the events of the week which will culminate on Saturday April 25th with an event at Temecula Elementary School featuring games, entertainment and refreshments for children and their families to enjoy. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 14th day of April, 1992. Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk City Clerk 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula Ca, 92591 Att. Ronald J. Parks Re: Declaration of "The Day of the Young Child" A Creative Learning Center Home Environment Day Care/Pre school Tessa Bandfield 31248 Eona Circle ~. Temecula Ca, 92592 699-3388 Dear Mr. Parks' We, the committee for the event , The Day of the Young Child, request to be placed on the April 21 agenda in order to present a Declaration for The Day of the Young Child. The Declaration is to be presented by local preschool children. The presentation will ta~e about five minutes. At the time of the presentation, we Will ask our city council to proclaim April 19 - 26 as the Week of the Young Child in Temecula. The Week of the Young Child is an annual celebration that focuses public attention.on the needs of young children and their families. Particularly the need for high quality early childhood programs. Sponsored by the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAYEC),the country's largest organization of Early Childhood professionals. The goal of the week is to build public understanding to the importance of early childhood programs in our society and to foster needed public support for theme programs. Although sponsored nationally, most of the celebrations are planned and implemented on a community basis. The Week of the Young Child will culminate on Saturday April 25 with an event to be held at Temecula Elementary School. The event is from 9:30am - 2:30 pm. Area Proschools, Schools, P.T.A's, Organizations and Service Groups will provide activities for children to en~oy. Food, balloons, games and free entertainment will be enjoyed. All activities are free and ch'ildren must be accompanied by an adult. The theme chosen for this year is "Spring Festival". We thank the city council for their support. Sincerely, Tessa D. The City of Temecula PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, Childhood is a time for love, hughter and learning; and WHEREAS, the formation of a child' s emotional, physical, sexual and spiritual make-up is as pliable as fresh chy; and WHEREAS, People who involve others in pornography exploitation and abuse are thieves disguised as trusted friends who enter lives and steal the innocence of their victims and alter the victim' s perception of themselves, others and the world around them for a lifetime; and WHEREAS, Children can only be ushered safely from childhood into responsible adulthood if they are surrounded by dedicated people in their community who will protect them; and WHEREAS, Protect the Children Resource Center, legislators, law enforcement, parents, educators, mental health experts, social service agencies, civic leaders, youth and religious organizations are united in their concan for victims of pornography; and WHEREAS, the California State Legislature has proclaimed Victims of Pornography Week an annual statewide event; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Patricia H. Birdsall, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim the week of May 3 through 9, 1992 to be: VICTIMS OF PORNOGRAPHY WEEK 1992 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 14th day of April, 1992. Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk Protect the Children Resource Center City of Tsmecula 43174 Business Park Drive Teescala, C~ 92590 March 20, 1992 Dear Mayor end City clerk: The 5th Annual Victims o~ P~rnography Week will take place on May 3-9. Last year well over 100 California cities participated by proclaiming the event intheir own city. Several years ago victims of Pornography Week was proclaimed an annual statewide event by the California legislature. The event provides an opportunity to express compassion for the victimswhile developing communityawa=eness to prevent pornography exploitation. Recent coverage.by California television stations of NAMBLA (North American Man/Boy Love :Association) has again highlighted the critical need for this focus on education. Enclosed is a copy of the 1992 proclamation as well as a letter from Governor Pete Wilson endorsing the event. We look forward to the participation of Teeecula and to receiving a copy of your proclamation which will be placed on our office wall as en encouragement to all victims and en indication of your compassion. Thank you for your concern end assistance. Since P.$. Please return the enclosed form to indicate your participation and to order materials for your city. OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR Stme of California May 3, 1992 I would like to extend my warm regards to citizens in California and throughout our nation who are observing Victims of pornography Week from May 3-9, 1992. pornography in its many ugly forms is readily available and can be seen in various areas of daily life, whether on television, video tapes, movies, magazines, or other publica- tions on the newsstand- Many consider the entire pornography industry to be based on activities that they consider to be immoral, and they point out that pornographic materials often depict acts that are violent in nature, particularly toward women. An even greater tragedy occurs when pornography falls into the hands of children, for these young citizens are not capable of fully understanding this type of sexually graphic material- They are the true victims of pornography, and we must continue to do what is necessary to protect this impressionable segment of our population from the destructive nature of pornography- This week-long observance provides an opportunity to look pornography realistically and a~sess the negative impact it at citizens of all ages, particularly for has on our society for .h d children- We must heighten public awareness an provide essen- tial education and prevention programs to ensure that no one becomes the unwilling victim of pornograP Y- Please accept my best wishes for a productive and informa- tive observance. Sincerely, PETE WILSON Sponsored by Protect The Children Resource Center For information call [510} 674-1384) ITEM 1 ITEM 2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD MARCH 24, 1992 A regular meeting of the TemecUla City Council was called to order at 7:01 PM in the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecule, California. Mayor Patricia H. Birdsall presiding. PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: I,indemans, Moore, Muf~oz, Parks, Birdsall ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and City Clerk June S. Greek. INVOCATION The invocation was given by PastOr George Simmons, Temecula Valley House of Praise. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the pledge of allegiance by Councilmember Parks. PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Mayor Birdsall proclaimed April 1992 to be Municipal Community Services Month, and encouraged the community to take full advantage of the many services made available through the City's Community Services Department. She presented the proclamation to Evelyn Harker, Chairperson of the Parks and Recreation Commission. Mayor Birdsall proclaimed April 13-17, 1992 to be Building Safety Week, and presented Tony Elmo, Director of Building and Safety with the proclamation. Mr. Elmo outlined the various activities planned by the Building and Safety Department for Building and Safety Week and encouraged the citizens to participate. Mayor Birdsall recognized Finance Officer Mary Jane Henry for receiving the Distinguished Budget Achievement Award. PUBLIC COMMENTS Patricia Bales, 39340 Jessie Circle, speaking on behalf of'a Senior Citizen Art Group, requested that the City Council do everything possible to preserve the existing Senior Center with its many services to the community. Minutee\3%24\92 - 1 - 03/30/92 City Council Minutes March 94. 1999 John Dedovesh, 39450 Longridge Drive, addressed the City Council regarding annexing south to the San Diego County border to encompass the Weigh Station, and thereby obtain revenue for the City. Mayor Birdsell stated the City is moving forward to annex this area. Loree Santomauro, 31130 S. General Kearny Rood, addressed the Council regarding the health concerns caused by the Buie Golf Course Maintenance Facility, at the Buie Margarita Village Development. She stated this use generates excessive noise and unhealthy fumes which impact the residents of Heritage Mobile Home Park. Ms. Santomauro presented the City Clerk with a copy of her comments. CONSENT CAI ;NDAR Mayor Birdsall announced that Public Hearings No. 13 and 14 will be continued for 30 days. City Attorney Field explained the reason for the continuance is to reach final agreement on a settlement for the clean up of Long Valley Wash. Councilmember Mufioz requested the removal of Consent Calendar Item No. 4. Mayor Birdsall stated she does not have a problem with Item No. 8 but would hope implementation of this program becomes a Main Street Program. It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-3, and 5-12. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks, Birdsell NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure 1.1 2. Minutes 2.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances end resolutions included in the agenda. Approve the minutes of March 10, 1992. Idinutee%3't24%.92 -2- 03/30/92 City Council Min,~es March 94. 1992 e e e Resolution ADorovirm Iist of Darnends 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 92-16 A RESOLUTION OF TNE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTNN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A City TrMsurer's Statement ',of Investment Palicy' 5.1 Adopt the Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy as proposed by staff which provides safety, liquidity and yield for City funds. Resolution and Anreement '~etween County of Riverside and Citv of Temecula to Permit Issuance of Mortoaoe Credit Certificates ~ Lieu of Bonds 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 92-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA DEBT LIMIT ALLOCATION COMMITTEE AND TO PERMIT THE ISSUANCE OF MORTGAGE CREDIT CERTIFICATES IN LIEU OF QUALIFIED MORTGAGE BONDS 6.2 Authorize the Mayor to execute Cooperative Agreement between the County of Riverside and the City of Temecula. Animal Control Agreement 7.1 Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with the County of Riverside to provide Animal Control Services in the City of Temecula. Award of a Professional Services Contract to Urban Design Studio to Preoare the Soecific Plan for Old TownTemecula 8.1 Award a Professional Services Contract to Urban Design Studio in the amount of $154,400 to prepare the Old Town Specific Plan and authorize the: Mayor and City Clerk to sign said contract. 8.2 Appropriate $30,000.00 in the CDBG fund for consulting services. Mi~utee%3%24~92 -3- 03~0J2 City Co~ q~cil Min, fees March ~4. 199~ 10. 11. CFD 88-1 ~ - Ynez Corridor. Reimbursement Ren,aJdons 9.1 Adopt a resdution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 92-19 A RESOLUTION QF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING CERTAIN RNDINO S REGARDING CITY EXPENDITURES IN CONNECTION WITH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 88-12 (YNEZ CORRIDOR) AS REQUIRED BY UNITED 8TATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY REGULATIONS {SECTION 1.103-18) Award of Contract for the Cormtn.~don of P-onc~ete ~eddewJlks at Rancho Flementarv School. Vail Elementann ichool and Temecula Elementann School aloha with the Construction of Ultimate ~treet Imnrovement. on Meraarits and Morass Roads adiacent to TemeculA l:lentent'rv School 10.1 Approve award of contract for construction of concrete sidewalks at Rancho Elementary School, Veil Elementary School, and Temecula Elementary School, along with the construction of ultimate street improvements on Margarits and Moraga Roads adjacent to Temecula Elementary Schod (Project No. PW 92-01 - Street and Sidewalk Improvements at Various Schools) to Inland Asphalt and Coating for ;175,890.86. 10.2 Appropriate ;193,479.95 (bid amount plus 10% to allow for possible change orders) from Gas Tax fund balance to Capital Projects Acct. No. 021-199-607-44-5804. After completion of the project, ;21,388.00 will be reimbursed to the City from SB-821 funds from the Riverside County Transportation Commission. Acceotsnce of Public Imorovements in Parcel Mso No. ~3561-~ 11.1 Accept the public improvements in Parcel Map No. 23561-2; 11.2 Authorize the reduction of street, sewer and water bonds and the release of subdivision monumentation bond; 11.3 Accept the subdivision warranty bond in the reduced amount; 11.4 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County and the City Clerk of the City of Murriets. IViinutes~3%24%92 -4- 03/3Ofl2 City Council Minutes' March 24. 1992 12. Release Faithful Performance Security - Parcel MaD No. ~4~39 12.1 Authorize the release of street and water system Faithful Performance Warranty Certificate of Deposit in Parcel Map No. 24239; 12.2 Direct the City Clerk to process the release of funds. Resolution Establishing Records Destruction/Retention Schedule City Clerk June Greek presented the staff report. Councilmember Mut~oz objected to the destruction of City Council Meeting video tapes and requested that these be turned over to the library for preservation. Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans Suggested retaining the tapes for five years instead of two years. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tern Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Mu~ioz to approve staff recommendation with the modification of Section E of the policy to change the period of retention of video tapes from 2 to 5 years. 4.1 Adopt a resolution emitled: RESOLUTION NO. 92-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN CITY RECORDS AS PROVIDED BY SECTION 34090 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA The motion was unanimously carried. PUBLIC HEARINGS 13. Vestire Tentative Tract ~3372 - Buie Maroarita Villaoe (Continued from the meeting of 2/24/92) 14. Vesting Tentative Tract :~3373 - Buie Margarita Village (Continued from the meeting of 2124/92) Mayor Birdsall opened the public hearings for Items 13 and 14 at 7:35 PM. MinuTes\3%24~92 -~- 03~0J2 City Council Minutes March ~4. 199~ It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Mayor Pro Tam I.indemans to continue Vesting Tentative Tract 23372 and 23373 to the meeting of April 28, 1992. The motion was unanimously carried. 15. Channe of 7one No. 18. Soecific Plan No. t 19. Amendment No. t Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report. Mayor Birdsell opened the public hearing at 7:40 PM. Larry Markham, 41750 Winchester Road, Ste N, representing the Developer, stated staff recommended approval of this Zone Change at both Planning Commission hearings. He stated subsequent to the hearings, a draft land use plan was developed that designates this area aS commercial. He stated the developer is comfortable with the uses proposed by staff, however in the continuing dialogue with the school district, several uses should be moved from unacceptable to conditionally acceptable. He stated with these modifications, the developer feels he has made a substantial effort at working out a favorable,compromise. Mayor Birdsall asked for a show of support from the audience. Approximately 40 people stood in support of this zone change. Robert Kosslyn, representing Temecula Valley Unified School District, clarified the objections of the School District. Mayor Birdsall called a brief recess at 8:58 PM to change the tape. The meeting was reconvensd at 8:59 PM. Iris Abernathy, 43980 Margarita Road, spoke in favor of Change of Zone No. 18, stating this property is surrounded by property designated commercial. Don Rohrabacker, 44281 Flores Drive, spoke in opposition to commercial development within the Los Ranchitos area. Melville Hershi, 30600 De Portola, spoke in opposition to the Change of Zone. Terry Gasson, speaking on behalf of the Board of the Los Ranchitos Homeowners Association, spoke against development within the Los Ranchitos area, stating that this would sat a precedent for further commercial development within the area. Anthony Rapoza, 44300 La Paz, spoke in oppositiOn to the Change of Zone No. 18 and objected to the Council recognizing a show of support from people whose names and addresses were not given. krmuTee%3~24%92 -6- O3/30fi2 City Col,ncil Minutes March ~4. 199~ Mayor Birdsall stated she had asked citizens to have one speaker present the position of a group and have the rest stand in support, and these people were doing as they had been requested to do, Larry Markham, rebutted comments by Mr. Kosslyn, stating he would be in favor of turning the alcoholic license .issue over to the State since the School District does not have a policy at present. He stated the developer has tried to come to an agreement, however restricting use to beer and wine inside a restaurant is the only point of disagreement. He further stated that a tire store or car wash noise would be drowned out by ambient noise from the street. He replied with regard to the Los Ranchitos Homeowners Association, the developer has been working on gathering the necessary signatures to have the parcel removed from the jurisdiction of the Los Ranchitos CC&R's. He also stated he would be happy to gather names and addresses of those who stood in support of this zone change. Mayor Birdsall closed the public hearing at 8:35 PM. Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans stated he could not support the zone change until the General Plan is complete. Councilmember Parks stated he in favor of the zone change and does not feel this action would be precedent setting. He stated this area was tentatively designated as a commercial area at the Joint City Council/Planning Commission General Plan meeting and to further delay action would be unfair. He stated the problem of the CC&R's will have to be handled by the developer. Councilmember Mu~oz stated he will not support this issue due to the objections of the. Los Ranchitos Homeowner's Association end would have preferred the matter of the CC&R's had been settled prior to the Change of Zone request. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Moore to reverse the decision of the Planning Commission and direct staff to prepare · zone change ordinance which is consistent with the land uses recommended in the staff report. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Moore, Parks, Birdsell NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Mu~oz Minutes\3%24%92 -7- 03~OJ2 City Co, emil Min,~es Mmrch ~4. 1992 R;CFSS Mayor Birdsall called a recess at 8:55 PM. The meeting was reconvened following the Community Services District Meeting at 9:16 PM. 16. ADDSel NO. ~- Anneal of (;;onrutions of Aonrovel - Public Imorovements for Tentative Tr*ct MAD No. ~6571 Director of Planning Thornhill presented the staff report. Tim Serlet briefed the Council on the basis of the appeal. He further requested that Council consider adding a Condition requiring Rancho Vista Rood to be improved (full width) prior to issuance of ibuilding permits. He recommended the appeal be denied and stated staff feels the conditions are appropriate. Mayor Birdsall opened the public hearing at 9:23 PM. Kenneth A. Wilch, 2440 S. Hacienda Blvd., #124, Hacienda Heights, representing the applicant, stated he feels the condition rmluiring a 28 ft. rood is unreasonable and requested that this condition be modified from 28 ft. to 24 ft. He requested that a rural standard apply to this area. Councilmember Mufioz asked if rural standards would be appropriate in this area. Director of Public Works Tim Sedet stated that a rural standard has not been developed in the City, however these conditions would be appropriate as an interim rural standard. John Telesi0, 31760 Via Telesio, Greentree Community, spoke in support of the applicant. He also requested that rural standards be developed for this area. Mayor Birdsall closed the public hearing at 9:41 PM. Councilmember Mui~oz stated he does not have s problem with reducing requirements for interior street improvements, however ha feels full improvements for Rancho Vista are necessary. Councilmember Moore agreed with the need to improve Rancho Vista Road, but requested that substandard roods not be permitted that will create future problems for the City. Jim Wright, Fire Chief, stated that a 28 ft. road is necessary to enable emergency vehicles to operate. Mb~es%3%,24%92 -8- 03/'30fi2 City Co,,ncil Minutes March 94. 1992 It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to approve staff recommendation with a modification to condition that all improvements of Rancho Vista Road be finished prior to issuance of building permits. Councilmember Parks pointed out that the Greentree Lane improvements are not limited to the property frontages but in fact extend for a considerable distance out to Pauba Road. Mayor Birdsall stated she is willing to reduce the interior road width to 24 foot, with 28 foot required in front of the tract properties. Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans withdrew the motion. Counciimember Moore withdrew her second. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Mur~oz to approve staff recommendation with the exception that the pavement width from the tract boundary to Pauba Road on Greentree Lane be reduced to 24 feet and the improvements to Rancho Vista Road be made (full width) prior to issuance of building permit. City Attorney Field suggested the addition of a condition that this tract will not protest the formation of .an assessment district for the purpose of widening Greentree Lane. Councilmember Parks amended the motion to include condition. Councilmember Muftoz amended the second. 16.1 Adopt the Negative Declaration Tentative Tract Map No. 26521; 16.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 92-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 26521 TO SUBDIVIDE A 10.80 ACRE TRACT INTO 10 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND DENY APPEAL NO. 22 ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON RANCHO VISTA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 946-009-007 The motion was unanimously carried. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to extend the meeting until 10:15 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. Minutes\3%24%92 -9- 03/30/92 City Cmwtcil Min,~es March 94. 1999 17. Reauest to the novernor's ~Office of Planning end Research for an Fxtenslon of Time to Complete the Preoaratiqn ~nd Adontion of tllJ Citv ~eneral Plan Gary Thornhill presented the staff report. Mayor Birdsall called s recess at 10:06 PM to change the tape. The meeting reconvened st 10:07 PM. Mayor Birdsall opened the public hearing at 10:09 PM. Hearing no requests to speak, Mayor Birdsall closed the public hamring at 10:09 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Mul~oz, seconded by Councilmember Moore to approve staff recommendation as follows: 17.1 Authorize City Staff to request a One Year Extension of Time to complete the General Plan; 17.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 92-21 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING AN EXTENSION OF THE THIRTY MONTH TIME PERIOD TO ADOPT:A CITY GENERAL PLAN, PURSUANT TO SECTION 65361 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE The motion was unanimously carried. COUNCIL BUSINESS It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans to continue Items 20, 21, 23 to the meeting of April 14, 1992. The motion was unanimously carried. 18. Report on Temecula Sister City Proiect City Manager Dixon presented the staff report. Councilmember Moore asked if the $2,000 fee is fo.r organization or armuel fees. City Clerk June Greek referred to Mr. Jon H. Lieberg, Temporary Chairman of the Temacula Sister Steering Committee, for the staff report. Minutes%3%24%92 -10- 03/30/12 City Council Minutes March ~4. 1992 Mr. Lieberg stated them is an annual fee of ~360,00 which the City has already paid. He explained the $2,000 is a cap on funding,. to ..cover set up fees for the non-profit organization. He stated all legal and accounting services have been donated at no charge. Mayor Birdsall expressed concern with forming another non-profit organization. She also questioned whether Ruth Chesher, a City staff member, should serve as the liaison between the organization and Council. Mayor Pro Tern Lindemans stated a non-profit organization is needed so that donations can be made, to cover such things as travel expenses. Mayor Birdsall asked if the name Town AffiliatiOn Association could be changed to Temecula Sister City Corporation. Mr. Lieberg explained that the Town Affiliation Association is the name of the National Organization and the local group will be named Temecula Sister City Corporation. It was moved approve staff 18.1 by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans to recommendation. Receive and file report on Sister City Project. 18.2 Approve funding up to the amount of $2,000 for organization expenses. 18.3 After the corporation formation, assign membership in the Town Affiliation Association and Sister City International to the non-profit Sister City Corporation. The motion was unanimously carried. City Manager Dixon stated in terms of staff for this organization, he suggested that the Director of Community Services be appointed liaison, and he could then assign staff support. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans to extend the meeting until 10:30 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. 19. 18th Year (FY 92-93) Community DeveloPment Block Grant Project Activities Assistant City Manager Mark Ochenduszko presented the staff report. Minutes%3%24%92 -11- 03,'30/92 City ~o~mcil Minutes Mnrch ~4. 199~ It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, secended by Councilmember Moore to approve staff recommendation as fallows: 19.1 Approve proposed projects for submittal to the County of Riverside Economic Development Agency for CDBG funding consideration. 19.2 Authorize the City Manage to submit applications for CDBG funding to the County of Riverside Economic Development Agency. The motion was unanimously carried. 22. Ieague of California Cities ;Inland Fmoire Division Roundaries Mayor Birdsell stated she will send notification to the League of California Cities by fax tomorrow of the decision of the Council. Councilmember Moore suggested that a Riverside County Division be established, excluding San Bernardino. Councilmember Muf~oz stated he believes there is validity to Option B because western cities seem to have more in common than those to the East. Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans stated he is in favor of leaving the boundaries as is. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Moore to separate the two Counties and have a Riverside County Division. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Moore, Mut~oz, Parks, Birdsall NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemens CITY MANAnFR RFPORTS Mr. Dixon reported on the LAFCO hearing scheduled for Thursday, March 26th at 9:00 AM. He advised that he has corresponded with board members and that 60% support from land owners within the sphere of influence has been obtained. klmlte%3~24%92 - 12- 03/30/92 City Council Minutes March 94. 1992 CITY ATTORNFY RFPORTS City Attorney Field reported on a new proposed change to the Brown Act which would have an effect on standard subcommittees. CITY COUNCIL RI:PORTS Councilmember Mufioz requested a staff report on the guidelines for posting of political signs within the City. Mayor Birdsall asked that the request for donation to the Volvo World Cup Team Penning Committee be placed on the next agenda. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Lindsmarts to adjourn at 10:38 PM to a Joint City Council/Planning Commission Meeting on the General Plan, March 25, 1992. The motion was unanimously carried. ATTEST: Patricia H'. Birdsall, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk Minutee\3\24%92 - 13- 03/30/92 MINUTES OF A JOINT MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL AND THE TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION HELD MARCH 25, 1992 A joint meeting of the Temecula City Council and the Temecula Planning Commission was called to order in the Main Conference Room, Temecula City Hall, 43174 Business Park Drive at 7:08 PM, Mayor Patricia H. Birdsall presiding. ROLL CAI L Temecula City Council PRESENT 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Moore, Parks ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Mur~oz Temecule Planning Commission PRESENT: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Ford, Chiniaeff ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey, Hoegland Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, Planning Director Gary Thornhill and City Clerk June S. Greek. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Councilmember Ronald Parks. PUBLIC COMMENTS No public comments were offered. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. Introduction Planning Director Gary Thornhill outlined the purpose of the meeting is to select the preferred Land Use Plan Alternative and also to summarize the actions resulting from the meetings of the five technical subcommittees. The consultants were introduced as well as Matt Bodine of MBS Lowry and Bob Davis serving as sub-consultants to the Planning Center. Minutes%3%25%92 - 1 - 03126/92 City Courtoil Minute. FebNew 26, 1992 Summary of the Technical Subcommittee Meetings Jim Ragsdale of the Planning Center distributed a report entitled "Summary of the key issues raised at the Technical Subcommittee meetings". He briefly explained the important issues raised by each of the five subcommittees. Land Use Desionations Mr. Ragsdale presented the Council and Commission with descriptions of the proposed land use designations. These included Residential: hillside residential, very low density residential, low/moderate density residential, medium density residential, high density residential and Commercial: neighborhood commercial, community commercial, highway tourist commercial, commercial manufacturing, business park, professional office, mixed use, village center overlay, specific plan areas, open space/recreational and public and institutional facilities. Planning Director Thornhill requested a description of the floor area ratios called out in the commercial designations. Jim Ragsdale diagrammed a typical floor area ratio of 1.0 for a one story use and for a four story structure on the same size lot. Commissioner Ford recommended that detailed definitions of the various designations be included in the general plan document. Randy Jackson of the Planning Center stated that one method might be to use a menu type of matrix to describe standards. Councilmember Parks suggested that when the General Plan is presented to the public, the 'use of visual materials will be important to graphically demonstrate the impacts of the various uses. Commissioner Chiniaeff recommended a slide presentation which shows existing uses and outlines the floor area ratios for those existing developments. Councilmember Parks asked if any discussion of light rail options took place during the Circulation Subcommittee meeting. Bob Davis, one of the sub-consultants working with the Planning Center responded that this subject was only touched upon briefly by the subcommittee. Councilmember Parks stated he would like to see a light rail implementation program included in the policies and some consideration given to long-term planning of possible routes. Discussion of Preferred Land Use Ran Randy Jackson of the Planning Center led a discussion of the draft preferred land use plan. He outlined how village center service areas fit into this land use plan. Minutes\3~25~92 -2- 03126/92 City CmaMil Minutee Febmew 26. 1992 RECESS Mayor Birdsall called a recess at 8:04 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 8:12 PM. Rand'y Jackson distributed two documents addressing the General Plan Preferred Land Use Plan distribution and population estimates. He indicated that the direction the distribution is taking is to more than double the size of the present City by including the land use plans for the area contained in the City's sphere of influence. Councilmember Moore questioned the source of the factor of 2.97 persons per household used in the population estimate matrix. Mr, Dennis Wambaum responded that these figures come from the State of California Department of Finance. Mayor Birdsall stated that some of-the open space designations shown on the draft plan map are private parks and not available for public use. She expressed the view that this needs to be considered when looking at the adequacy of the parks and recreation element. Dennis Wambaum, a sub-consultant with the Planning Center, gave an overview of the draft fiscal element. He stated that the revenue sources, if not substantially reduced by the State, should support a balanced element that will supply sufficient revenues. He advised that this assessment does not include the TCSD, since the basic source of funding for the district is not the same. He said the general conclusion at this time is that the plan will work fiscally. Mayor Birdsall asked it this is any method to determine the potential revenues that could be generated to the City from the new Weigh Station south of the City. Mr. Wambaum stated he will check into this and provide that information at the next presentation. Councilmember Parks questioned if the financial element is being addressed in the context of the City's Mission Statement and the desire to maintain at least a 10% reserve for contingency. Mr. Wambaum responded that this is being factored into the fiscal element. Councilmember Parks asked if there is still flexibility in the plan that allows "penciled in" uses other than those considered at the time it is adopted. Karen Gulley of the Planning Center answered that there is the opportunity to identify alternate uses on the specific plan areas. Randy Jackson outlined the 28 specific plan areas which can be very general or can be handled with land use designations identified. He said The Planning Center recommendation is that the general plan be developed to identify land use patterns and the specific plan overlays being targeted for more specific land use designations. Minutes~3~,25~92 4- 03126/92 City Council Minutes Febmew 26. 1992 Larry Markham addressed the Council and Commission suggesting that in the specific. plan areas it is important to address the matter of multi-ownerships. Coun. cilmember Parks asked when, in the process, the City's planning decisions start being based on the preferred land use map. After discussion, it was the concurrence of the Council and Commission that although changes can be made up until the final adoption of the plan, wholesale changes are not anticipated and the draft preferred land use plan would be used throughout the remainder of the General Plan process. CITY MANAGrR RrPORTS No report presented COMMISSION REPORTS No reports presented. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS No reports presented. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Moore to adjourn at 9:47 PM to a meeting to be held jointly with the City Council of the City of Murrieta on March 31, 1992 at the Murrieta City Hall, 26442 Beckman Court, Murrieta, California. The motion was unanimously carried. It was moved by Commissioner Chiniaeff, seconded by Commissioner Ford to adjourn to a regular meeting of the Planning Commission to be held on April 6, 1992, at 6:00 PM in the Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula California. The motion was unanimously carried with Commissioners Fahey and Hoagland absent. PATRICIA H. BIRDSALL, MAYOR ATTEST: JOHN E. HOAGLAND, CHAIRMAN JUNE S. GREEK, CITY CLERK Minutes\3\25\92 -4- 03/26/92 MINUTES OF A SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MURRIETA HELD MARCH 31, 1991 A joint workshop of the Temecul$ City Council and the City Council of the City of Murrieta was called to order at 7:06 PM inthe City Council Chambers of the City of Murrieta, 26442 Beckman Court, Murrieta, California. Mayor Jerry Allen presiding. ROLL CALL: City Clerk A. Kay Vinson of the City of Murrieta called the roll as follows: PRESENT 4 MURRIETA Haas, Smith, Weishaupl, Allen COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Perry City Clerk June Greek of the City of Temecula called the roll as follows: PRESENT 5 TEMECULA L i n d · m a n s, M o o r ·, COUNCILMEMBERS: Mur~oz, Parks, Birdsall ABSENT: 0 . COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Managers Jack Smith and David Dixon, City Attorneys Neil Singer, and Scott F. Field and City Clerks A. Kay Vinson and June S. Greek. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Councilmember Dave Haas. INVOCATION Pastor Ron Bolt, Peoples Church of the Valley, delivered the invocation. PUBLIC COMMI:NTS Trudy Thomas 41036 Magnolia St, address the Councils speaking in favor of the two cities directing letters of support for AB 3071 to the State Assembly Public Safety Committee. Joan Ellis, 40105 Ravenwood Drive, spoke regarding the need to jointly coordinate the transportation needs of both communities. ~ 2/Minu tee/313 1/9 2 - 1 - 04/02/92 Ciw Courmil Minute Merch 31. 1991 Councilmember Muf~oz stated that, in his capacity as a representative to the Riverside Transit Authority, he has requested RTA to contact the City staff regarding the transit needs of the City of Murriete. City Manager Jack Smith responded that RTA has made contact with City of Murrieta staff. Henry Jack Johnson, 25845 Hayes Avenue, spoke in favor of placing an 80 foot wide access street on both sides of the Murrieta Creek to help move traffic from north of the City of Murrieta to approximately Front Street in Temecule. He also spoke in favor of creating additional dams and small lakes along the length of Murrieta Creek for retention purposes. DISCUSSION ITEMS Mayor Pro Tern Lindemans suggested that under the heading of "other matters of mutual interest" a discussion of the flood control channel be included. Councilmember Parks requested that a discussion of economic development, specifically creation of addition jobs in the valley, be added to that section of the agenda. Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans also suggested the addition;of the topic, development of French Valley Airport, 1. Traffic and Transportation Mayor Birdsall outlined the desire, on the part of the City of Temecula, to develop a Western Corridor to run from Highway 79 South and the I-15 to approximately Cherry Street. She asked that the City Council of the City of Murrieta address how this might serve their community and what potential linkages they might wish to add to this roadway. Councilmember Fred Weishaupl addressed.a plan showing existing and potential north/south corridors which parallel the I-15 and which service traffic between both cities. He outlined a plan to place a freeway interchange at Date Street in Murrieta and he expressed his opposition to placing a bridge over the Murrieta Creek in the area of Cherry Street. He suggested that a PSR recommending an additional freeway interchange be prepared for presentation to CalTrans. Councilmember Parks suggested a joint meeting of the two cities to decide where another interchange can be placed to best serve the needs of both cities. Dennis Chiniaeff, representing Rancon, spoke regarding a PSR submitted to CalTrans by Rancon approximately four (4) years ago, which was turned down based upon the fact that Date Street is not at least one mile from the next freeway interchange. Councilmember Haas suggested having freeway on-ramps constructed at Date Street for north bound traffic and at Elm Street for south bound traffic, rather than full interchanges at only one location. 21Minutesl313 1/92 -2- 04/02/92 CiW Coundd Minute March 31. 1991 After discussion of various options to further investigate the best location for an additional freeway interchange, it was suggested by City Manager David Dixon that the question bolls down to the basic fact that an interchange needs to be installed somewhere between the "Y" of the two freeways and Winchester Road. He further suggested a fast-tracked study might be undertaken to identify the best site. Councilmember Gary Smith concurred and suggested that the impact of increasing commercial traffic into both cities, be addressed in this study. City of Temecula City Engineer Tim Serlet, in response to a question from Mayor Birdsall, advised a study of this type should cost approximately $10,000 to $15,000. It was moved by Mayor Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to authorize a study to identify the bast freeway interchange location between the "Y" of the I-15 and 1-215 and Winchester Road, the cost of which is to be shared jointly by the City of Temecula and the City of Murrieta in an amount not to exceed $15,000. The motion was unanimously carried. It was moved by Mayor Allen, seconded by Councilmember Smith to authorize a study to identify the best freeway interchange location between the "Y" of the I-15 and 1- 215 and Winchester Road, the cost of which is to be shared jointly by the City of Temecula and the City of Murrieta in an amount not to exceed $15,000. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Haas, Smith, Weishaupl, Allen NOES: O COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Perry Councilmember Parks stated he would like to see a joint City Committee established to address all mutual traffic and transportation matters. Mayor Allen recommended the Traffic and Transportation Commissions of each city be tasked to work jointly on a committee of this sort. City of Temecula Planning Director Gary Thornhill suggested that one traffic and transportation commissioner, one planning commissioner and a liaison from the City Council from each city be assigned to this committee. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to establish such a committee and make the appropriate assignments for the City of Temecula. The motion was unanimously carried. 2/IVlinutes/3/31 tO2 -3- 04/02/92 CiW Coundl Minutes Meroh 31, 1991 It was moved by Mayor Allen, seconded by Councilmember Smith to establish such' a committee and make the appropriate assignments for the City of Murrieta. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Perry absent. Major Allen referred to the ACTS report regarding traffic issues and recommended that this report be made available to the committee at their first meeting. French Valley Airport Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans asked for the viewpoints of the Councilmembers of the City of Murrieta on the eventual size and scope of the French Valley airport. Councilmember Parks said he would like to lead the discussion by stating his desire is to see the airport developed as a general aviation airport capable of handling small jets and small commuter aircraft. Councilmember Smith stated he feels the airport will be a major incentive for locating industrial facilities in the valley and he favors it being capable of handling small commuter aircraft as well. Councilmember Moore reported that FAA regulations, mandated to go into effect in 1995, require stage three aircraft for commuter use. She said this type of aircraft is much quieter than the aircraft that is currently being used for commuter service. Councilmember Mu~oz stated that while he would like to see an airport that provides a strong economic base, he does not feel it should be developed at the expense of the residents around the airport. Councilmember Haas agreed that the economic base is necessary but he expressed concerns with the noise and exhaust emissions generated by such a facility. Councilmember Weishaupl stated he does not have enough information to make any decisions regarding the benefits and\or detriments of a regional airport. Councilmember Moore said the County is beginning to work on the airport land use general plan for French Valley Airport which will give both cities considerably more data. Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans stated 11,000 acres of land surrounding the airport are impacted by its development and he does not see it as a "blessing". Mayor Allen reported that in conversations with large industrial employers in the area, he has been made aware of the need for this type of airport to serve the growing industrial base. He pointed out the need for both jurisdictions to look very carefully at the need for additional road infrastructure to support this facility. 21Minutes13131/92 -4- 04/02/92 City Council Minute March 31. 1991 RECESS Mayor Allen called a recess at 8:30 PM. The' meeting was reconvened at 8:43 PM. e Murrieta Creek Rood Control Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans said he would like to see a professional study performed to determine the proper method to provide flood control during peak flood periods and also provide some aesthetic enhancement of the Murrieta Creek. Mayor Allen advised that the City of Murrieta presently has a severe flooding problem as a result of the lack of proper flood control measures and that they need to see a better solution than a natural treatment for the sake of aesthetics. Mayor Birdsall spoke in favor of both cities supporting the continuing efforts of the Flood Control District's application for a permit to begin construction of flood control improvements. Councilmember Haas stated flood control must be addressed using effective flood control measures. He opposed trying to create parks in flood control channels. Councilmember Mufioz spoke in favor of preserving the natural creek beds that runs through both communities. Councilmember Parks addressed the solution being recommended by the Murrieta Creek Advisory Committee. He urged both City Councils to support the County Flood Control District's efforts to have the 1 OK permits approved. Economic Development IsSues Councilmember Parks said he feels both cities need to aggressively pursue new business and industrial development in the valley. He spoke in favor of streamlining various permit processes to assist in this development. Councilmember Haas advised that the Cities of Murrieta and Temecula as well as the Temecula Wine Country will be exhibiting at the upcoming Inland Business Expo. He also advised that the City of Murrieta is reviewing its fee structures with the hope of making it more attractive to develop property. Councilmember Mur~oz suggested the Cities propose a fast-track process be implemented by the County of Riverside for the surrounding unincorporated areas as well. CITY MANAGER REPORTS 2/Mioutes/3/31/92 -6- 04/02/92 Citv Council Minutes March 31.1991 None presented CITY ATTORNFY R;:PORTS None presented CITY COUNCIL REPORTS None presented ADJOURNMI=NT It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to adjourn at 9:14 PM to a meeting to be held on April 9, 1992 jointly with the City of Temecula Parks and Recreation Commission at the Main Conference Room of the Temecula City Hall, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. Mayor Allen declared the meeting adjourned to the next meeting of the Murrieta City Council to be held on April 7, 1992, 6:00 PM, at the Council Chambers, Murrieta City Hall, 26442 Beckman Court, Murriete, California. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Perry absent. Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk 2/Minutes/3/31/92 -6- 04/02/92