The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About101200 PTS AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to 13articipate in this meeting, please contact the offic~ of the City Clerk at (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangemen? to ensure accessibili~ to that meeting [28 CFR35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] ' AGENDA .TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETy COMMISSION TO BE HELD AT cITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 Business Park Drive ' Temecula, Calif6rnia Thursday, October 12, 2000 at 6:60 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: FLAG SALUTE ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Edwards, Katan, Lanier, Connerton PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the phblic can address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers.are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the'. - Commission about an item no~ listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secreh3ry. When you are cafled to speak, please come forward and. state'~our name and address. For all other agenda items, a "Request t6 Speak" form must be filed with the Recording Secretary before the Commtsslon gets to that)tern There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted b" one vote. l'here will be no discussion of these items unless m6mbers of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission request specific items be remox)ed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. .' COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of September 14~ 2000 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approv~ the Minutes of September 14, 2000 r :\traffic\commissn\agendaL2000\ 1012Agenda/aj p COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. Traffic Concerns along Georgetown Lane, Carelton Way and Winwo0d Circle in the Promenade Subdivision RECOMMENDATION: 2~:1 ~ . That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission deny the request to'close Widwood Circle at " Rycrest Drive 3. Wolf Creek Project Circulation Plan REC~)MMENDATION: ' 3; 1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive' and file a presentation regarding the Wolf Creek Project Circulation project plans.. Commission Meeting Schedule - November and Dece~nber. 2000 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission direct, the Secretary to 'cancel anal/or re- , schedule the regular meetings for November 'and December, 2000, and to perform the aplSropriate posting and noticing requirements per the Gox;ernment Code. Traffic Engineer's Report Police Ch!eFs Rep~r~ 7. Fire Chief's Report 8. Commissiofl Reports ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission wily be held On Thursday, October 26., 2000, at 6:00 P.M., Tem~cula City Hall, Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park. Drive, Temecula, California. - r:\traffic\commissn\a~enda\2000\1012Agenda/ajp ' ITEM NO. I MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 14, 2000 CALL:TO ORDER The City of Temecula. Public/Traffic Safety Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:0OP.M., on Thursday, September.14, 2000, in the City Council Chambers of ~l'emecula City Hall, 43200 Business. Park Drive, Temecula, California. FLAG SALUTE The audien~:e was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Coe. ~ROLL cALL ·Present: Absent: Also Present: PUBLIC COMMENTS- Commissioners Coe, Katan, Lanier, and Chairman Conn~rton. Commissioner Edwards. Director of Public Works Hughes, Senior Engineer M0ghadam, Police Officer Nelson, ' Administrative Secretary Pyle, and' Minute Clerk Hansen. Mr. Scott Eggum, 41833 Carleton Way, via an overhead map, presented the · Commission with information regarding the heavy volumes and speeding in the Promenade hous!ng tract, specifying the streets most heavily impacted; noted that the neighboring residentia! area was utilizing the Promenad~ tract as a cut-though·route; and reiquested the Commission to address these concerns regarding the safety of the residents, and to previ~e the residents with a recommendation in order to create safer "conditions. In res~3onse to Chairman Connerton's request·, Senior Engineer M(~ghadam relayed that .t.his issue could be agendized for the October 12, 2000 Public/Traffic Safety meeting. commissioner Coe requested thht staff obtain info~'mation regarding the Planning Commission's approval of thi~ Promenade housing development with respect to the traffic circulation plan, reiterating the Public/Traffic Safety commission's recommendation that prior to the Planning Commission approvihg developments, th'e traffic circulation portion of the project should be presented to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission for review and input. In response, SeniOr Engineer Moghadam relayed that he would investigate obtaining dat~ with respect to the approval of this circulation plan. For informational purposes,. Chairman Connerton relayed that with respect to cut- .through traffic, since these Were City streets this impact-could not be controlled, advising that the alternate issues would be addressed. ' ~ COMMISSION CONSENT cALENDAR 1. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 . Approve'the Minutes of July 13, 2000. 1.2 Approve the Minutes of July 27, 2000. MOTION: Commissioner Coe moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1.1, and 1.2. The motiori was seconded by Commissioner Lanier and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of COmmissioner Edwards wh~ was absent. COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. North General Kearny Road Ne ghbOrhood Meeting Status Report RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file the status report on the North General Kearny Road Neighborhood Meeting. Director of Public Works Hughes presented the staff report (of record), noting that the City had held an informal meeting on August 28, 2000 with the North General Kearny Road residents to discuss the speeding !mpacts in the area; relayed that.numerous suggestions for solutions were brought forward by the residents, listed as follows: enforcement at 25 MPH, education, residents listing violators via identifyin~l license plate numbers, installation of stop signs or speed bumps, placement of signage reflecting Children at Play, closing the north end of the read; advised that'there would be assurance that increased enforcement would be directed to'this area; noted that there was additionally interest in working with the School District to distribute a flyer educating .the parents with regard to the fact that North General Kearny Road was a residential street, reminding drivers to respect the property owners in the area when transporting -' their children to and from school; and relayed that staff would.investigate the feasibility=of installing .signage denoting the fine for a speed violation.. Chairman Connerton relayed that he had emphasized to the residents at the meeting that a joint effort wi~s necessary between the City and the neighborhood residents in ' 'order to effectively address the negative impacts; reiterated the topics of discussion at the August 28, 2000 meeting; and advised that the most effective speed deterrent was enforcemedt. Ms. Cindy Mathes, 39797 North General Kearny Road, queried the rationale for the lack of enforcement in the area during the past months; thanked the Police Department for- the increased enforcement du. ring the last two days, confirming that when Police Officers . were present, drivers were reducing their speeds, requesting th'at the enforcement be consistent to yield a long:term effective impact; and advised that the contacting SchooF personnel had not been an effective tool for addressing the traffic.. In response to MS. Mathes' comments, Police Of~cer Nelsbn relayed that the . Neighborhood Enforcement Program would address speeding impacts dudng schoo! " hours, as well as at alternat~ times of the day; and clarified that the neighborhood enforcement Officer was now working full time to address residential imf)acts.. For Ms. Mathes, Chairman Cor~nerton relayed that staff was in the process.of investigating the feasibility) of i_nstalling signage denoting the fine for speeding.. Mr. Bob'Lopshi~e, 40244 Atmore Court, commented on the'concept of pursuing the program entitled Keep Kids Alive, Drive 25,.noting that the City of Oceanside was currently utilizing this campaign relaying additional information regarding the implementation of the program; read into the record a letter drafted by the PTA staff, for distribution, which'addressed the need'for cautious driving on North General Kearny Road, providihg information regarding alternate travel routes; ~ind relayed that after approval by the School District the letter would be distributed; an.d queried the Commission for ihput regarding the letter. F'or informationa! purPoses, Ms. Mathes relayed that per earlier discussions with the Commissioner that Commissioner Edwards was in the process of..obtaining additional data regarding the KeeP Kids Alive Drive 25 program. In response to Commiss!oner Katan's comments.regarding the upcoming new development in this area'and the potential for sidewalks which could create a feasible condition for the placement of crosswalks, Mr. Lopshire relayed that due to th~ '~ · developer's plan to pursue development of this property adjacent to the school, the property which had been utilized for parking (due to the past generosity of the property owner) was no longer available which was further impacting the traffic situation. In response to Mr. Lopshire's queries, Senior Engineer Mogh~dan~ coofirmed that the figure denoted in the letter referencing 1500 vehicular trips a day on North General Kearny Road was an accurate approximate figure. The Commission relayed that the draft letter was well written, advising that it should'be effective, Chairman Connerton relaying that the PTA could consider forwarding the letter tq the press. Ms. Carolyn E. Harrison, 30239 Silver Ridge Court, relayed her ppposition to the request of residents to close off residential roads; and queried the rationale for not placing stop signs on North General Kearny Road tc~ control speed. For Ms. Harrison, Senior Engineer Moghadam provided additional information regarding . the ineffectiveness of stop signs to control speed (via the results of numerous traffic studies). Confirming the ineffecti,veness~of stop signs to control speed, Chairman Co. nnerton provided further comments, reiterating that community involvement and increased enforcement were the only proven tools effective in reducing speeds.in residential areas. Noting that this Agenda Item was'a receive ahd file issue, Chairman Connert°n recommended agendizing the issue to consider the feasibility of installing signage denoting fines for traffic violatio~s,_.and to addi-ess.the street closure issue, in o!der for · R:ltrafficminutesl091400 the Commission to make a recommendatibn to the City Council· In response, S~nior Engineer Moghadam relayed that the issue could be agendized for a November Commission meeting. Limit Line for Yellow Change Interval at Signalized Intersections RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review and provide input regarding limit line for yellow change interval at signali;~ed intersections. Senior Engineer Moghadam provided an overview of the staff report (a~ per agenda material), relaying that this issue had been agendized due to a request from the Commission to review the feasibility of installing a limit line prior to signalized intersections in order to provide drivers an indication mark to determine.whether (~r not a vehicle would have sufficient time to go through the intersection without violating the red light; noted that after additional research, staff noted that there were no other jurisdictions utilizing this type of application; and advised that the disadvantages of installing the application outweighed the benefits, reiterating that the application had not been utilized, noting the liability issues, and relaying the variables of the placement of· the limit line associated with the speed and volume of traffic. The Commission concurred with staffs findings, Commissioner Coe.c0m.menting on the potential danger of additional rear-end type accidents with the use of the application. Additional diScussion ensued regarding potential dangers associated ~vith the use of this application. Chairman Connerton relayed that since this was a receive and file issue, no further action would be taken by the Commission. 4. Public/Traffic Safety Commission Meeting Schedule Revision I~ECOMMENDATION: 4.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission consider the feasibility of .' holding one (1) regularly scheduled Commission meeting per month. Director of Public Works Hughes presented the staff report (of record), relaying the original rationale for the proposed schedule to hold two regularly scheduled monthly meetings for the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, noting the selected short-term traffic circulation improvement projects that required immediate attention, advising that those particular projects have all been completed; relayed th. at due to the lack of current action items hecessitating tw_o monthly meetings, staff was requesting input from the Commission regarding holding one regularly scheduled meeting per month, noting that instaffs opinion the issues could be adequately served with one monthly meeting; and a~Msed that numerous hours of staff time were expended each time a Commission meeting was scheduled. Chairman Connerton relayed that the Commission had made previous requests to review cedain items (i.e., the review of tract maps), bu~ that due to time constraints had R:ltrafficminutes\091400 been unable to do so; and noted that if the meetings were scheduled for twice a month, that a meeting could, be cancelled more easily than scheduling an additional Special meeting. Relaying that he Was ~ot opposed to scheduling the'meetings once a month, Commissioner Katan noted that the additional availability of the Commissioners could be · utilized for opportunities to hear public concerns and/or to attend scheduled neighborhood public meetings, advising that if a regular neighborhood forum was h'eld the residential comments could be heard and addressed. Commissioner Coe ad~,ised that in his opinion this Commission has been grossly underutilized; noting that there were numerous issues related to traffic that required addressing; noted that residents consistently brought forward to the Commission concerns regarding developmental impacts (i.e., the public comments expressed at tonight's meeting), relaying that it would be beneficial for the Public/Traffic Safety Commission to address these concerns prior to development, at which time traffic circulation impacts could be mitigated more effectively by the Commission. Commissioner Lanier c(~ncurred with maintaining the currently scheduled two' monthly meet!ngs, noting that if a second meeting was deemed unnecessary that it could be canceled, relaying hopes that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission could be more effectively utilized. With respect to reviewing developmental projects prior to the Planning Commission's appro~/al, Chairman Connerton relayed that the response to this request in the past by Deputy City Manager Thornhill had been that this review pro_cess was not required by Law and that the Planning Department would not recommend the additional review; and advised that in his opinion, it would be beneficial for the Public/Traffic Safety Commission to proactively address the circulation issues in order to forward recommendations to the Planning Commission for its consideratisn. Commissioner Coe concurred with the need to address potential negative traffic impacts prior to development, siting current development projects in the approval process at.this time; and noted his frustration with respect to continually attempting to mitigate traffic impacts "after the fact.'~ Chairman Connerton concurred with the previous Commission commenis, reiterating that thisCommission was underutilized. In response to the Commission con~:erns, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that with respect to the Co~mission's desire for additional involvement in the planning process, that this suggestion had been previously explored, noting that it was not within the Public Works Department's purview to grant this formal review process to the Commission; noted that for informational purposes, a courtesy review of the development plans could be presented to the Commission, relaying that the Commission comments could be considered for incorporation into the Public Works Department's' Conditions of Approval for the project, clarifying that them would be no official action taken by the Commission. Chairman connert0n advised that it would be beneficial to have an additional formal ~eview of the developmental circulation plans, noting the benefits of a supplementary review by five additional individuals (i.e., the Commissioners). · Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that protocol was received via the city Council ' with respect to the charges of the Planning Commissi0n..and the Public/Traffic Safety -' Commission, advising that staff could bring the request to the City Council for direction -- -. regarding the Commission's desire to review Land Use Plans, clarifying that at this time staff did not have the jurisdiction to grant the reque§t; and for Chairman Connerton, relayed that the issue could potentially be presented to the City Council in October. Ch~!rman Connerton clarified that it was not his intention t(~ imply that the Public Works -~ ,'DePartment was not doing excellent work, noting t.he desire to simply address traffic impacts at an earlier.stage; relayed that the public member who spoke during the cdmment period at tonight's meeting brought forward to the Commission a new. development of residential housing with undersized streets. In response, Director of ' ~. Public Works Hughes. advised that to the best of his knowledgethe development plan (the Promenade hbusing tract) that was discussed were plans that had been approved -prior to the City's incorporation, clarifying the direction the Public Works Departmental staff provide during the review process. Chairmap Connerton relayed that previously approved'Subdivision Tract MaRs could be reviewed prior to developmdnt if it was determined to be an outdated map o~: if it would create future safety impacts. For Commissioner Katan. Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed'that the Public Works Department thoroughly reviews the new development maps prior to approval. Director of Public Works Hugnes relayed that typically the majority of conditions placed on a project orig~ mated from.:the Public Works Department, advising that a Public Works Department staff member was always in attendance and available for input and questions at the Planning Commission meetings when the Commi§sion reviewed projects; advised that when expansive project plans were presented to the Planning Commission,.siting the Wolf Creek Project, that an extensive environmental review was conducted, relaying that approximately forty percent (40%) of the review regarding the Wolf Creek project was the ri~view of traffic imp_acts inclusive of the impacts on the surrounding areas, relaying that the conditions on.these type of projects were comprehensive. Chairman Connerton reiterated that the Public Traffic Sa(ety Commission's comments regarding projects could be forwarded to the Planning. Commission for its consideration. MOTIONJ Commissioner Coe moved to maintain the current meeting schedule until the first-meeting in January, of 2001, when the issue could be brought back to the . Commission. Commissioner Lanier seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Edwards who was absent. In response to Senior Engineer Moghadam, tt-ie Commissio.n relayedthat if staff found it necessary to cancel a .meeting, the current process was satisfactory. 6 TRAF~FIC ENGINEER'S REPORT : A. Senior Engineer Moghadam noted that there Were new s~gnals that recently energized in the City of Temecula. POLICE CHIEF;S REPORT have been .A. Po!ice Officer Nelson ~'~layed that the Police.Department would continue efforts of enfomement in the'residential areas, noting that the use of radar trailers would also be implemented; with respect tot the North General Kearny Road area, advised that in a 16-day period of time, nine speeding violations had been issued, notingthat at the next meeting additional data would be available due to the focus in this area. Chairman Connerton requested that the Police Department provide a report stating the number of citations issued and the location of the issuance, and an additional repor~ denoting the'number of accidents, and the locations of the accident~ for the Commission's review. In response, Police Officer Nelson. relayed that this information'could be provided to the Commission. C. For Chairman Connerton, Police Officer Nelson ensured that data could be relayed to him regardin~ the next scheduled checkpoints. Commissioner Lanier relayed that the subsequent checkpoint would be held on September 22, 2000. FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT A. ' Chairman Cgnnerton commended the Fire Department for their excellent work with respect to'the recent fires. COMMISSION REPORTS Commissioner Lanier expressed gratitude to the Police Department,.noting that he was able to ~btain information requested by a commbnity resident expeditiously due to the quick response to his queries from the Police Department. With respect to the traffic congestion surrounding the'schools, Commissioner ' Katan commended the City Council and the School District for their efforts to meet ~ogether to address the impacts: Commission Katan noted that at the School District Transportation Committee meeting the question had arisen regarding whether it was possible to place a No Left Turn sign at the Margarita Middle School exit (exiting onto Margarita Road). Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that the City had requested that a formal lette, r denbting the request be received from the School District's Transportation Department, advising that at that point the reciuest would be investigated. Condurring with Commissioner coe's comments regarding proactively addressing traffic safety issues, Commissioner Katan provided data to the Commission regarding Roundabouts (i.e., traffic circles), commenting on the informative data. In. response to (~hai~man Copnerton, Commissioner Katan relayed that h~ was ' currently serv!.n.g on the Schoo D strct Ttan~portatiSn .Committee.. After Commissioner qtJerying, Chairman Connerton relayed that it was the 'Commission's recommendation that in his service on the Committee, Commissioner. Katan serve as the Public/Traffic Safety Commission lia!son.. Cbmmissioner Katan queried the timing' of the left-hand turn signal from :Winchester Road to Margarita Road at the time period between 2:00-2:30 P;M., noting that it had been reported to him that the timing of the signal'solely.allows three-to-four vehicles to make a left turn which impacts traffic flow, noting,that ' even when there'were no:individuals in the crosswalk the timing was mini.rnal; "and relayed that numerous drivers were running the red light which was further impacting traffic flow. In response, Senior Engineer M0ghadam relayed that he , Would investigate and provide an ,update at a Subsequent meeting. H~ Commissioner Katan queried whether staff co,uld investigate avenues utilized by - alternate cities, which address the public's use of cell phones while driving (i.e. .' educational programs regarding a hand~-free use of cell phones). In [esponse to Commissioner Coe's queries,Director.of Public Works Hughes ~elayed that in the five-y~ar CIP there had been study funds identified for a - potential location for a crossing between HighwaY 79'South and Pala Road; and noted that the priority process for categorizing projects in the CIP was determined by warrants which justify the rationale for the improvements. For C0mmis'si'0ner Coe, Senior,Engineer Moghadam relayed that With respect to · co-nsideration to'install signage denoting fines for-traffic violations, that this matter was currently being investigat~d~by staff. Commissioner Coeirecommended that the issue of renaming Highway 79 South be agendized for ~ fUture meeting, relaying that currently'there are no major roads named after the. City of Temecula. In' response, Director of Public Works _ Hbghes relayed that it would most likely be more effective to petition the City as an individual for that name change; and in response to the request for additional information regarding the associated data, provided infor, mation regarding the apProximate costs of the name change, the process, and the necessary, approvals. After additional discussion it was dete[mined that Commission Coe and Director~ of Public Works Hughes would further discuss this issue at an alternate time. For information purposes, Chairman Connerton relayed that the Border Control ' was holding aC t zen's Academy which'would begin on October 4, 2000 at 6:00 P.M., meeting weekly for six weeks, noting the topics of discussion in order to develoP awareness of the Border Control's authorities and activities. For the record, Co. mmissioner. Coe a;:lvised that in his opinion when the United · States began dealing with the Mexican border in a similar manner as the Canadian border there would no longer need to be the border checkpoint· Chairman Cbnnerton relayed that at numerous left-ha~d turn signals in the City of Ternecula drivers were turning on red lights, which was negatively affecting congestion (i.e., Rancho California Road, Ynez Road, and Winchester Road.) AD~JOURNMENT At 7:48 P.M. Chairman Connerton formally adjourned this meeting to Thursday, September 28, 2000 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. Chairman Darrell L. Connerton ' Administrative Secretary Anita Pyle TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: AGENDA REPORT Public/Traffic Safety Commission Ali Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer, .Traffic October 12, 2000 Item 2 Traffic Concerns along Georgetown Lane, Carelton Way and Winwood Circle in the Promenade Subdivision RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission deny the request to close Winwood'Circle at Rycrest Drive. BACKGROUND: At the meeting of September 14,'2000, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission received a request from the Promenade Homeowners Association to review the feasibility of closing Winwood Circle at Rycrest Drive to eliminate "cut-through" traffic along Georgetown Lane and Carleton Way. The public has been notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's consideration of this issue through the agenda notification process ~nd by mail. Georgetown Lane is a 36-foo't wide residential street that provides access m~numerous residential homes between Margarita Road, Carleton Way and ultimately Winwood Circle. On-street parking is allowed on both sides of the roadway. The average daily traffic (ADT) volume on Georgetown Lane is approximately 1,097 just east 6f Margarita Road. The'prima facie speed limit .on Georgetown Lane is 25 MPH. Georgetown Lane at Marghrita Road does not allow for westhoufid to southbound left turns. Carleton Way is a 36-foot wide residential street that provides access to numerous residential homes between Georgetown Lane, Winwood Circle and ultimately Rycrest Drive. On-street parking is allowed on both sides of the roadway and the prima facie speed limit i§ 25 MPH.' Wihwood Circle is a 36-fobt wide residential street that provides access to numerous residential homes between Rycrest Drive, Carelton Way, Georgetown Lane and ultimately Margarita Road. On-street parking is allowed on both sides of the roadway and the prima facie speed limit is 25 MPH. The traffic volume on Winwood Circle west of Rycrest Drive is approximately 613 ADT. Rycrest Drix;e is a 44-foot wide collector roadway that provides access to numerous residential homes between Margarita Road and Solana Way. On-street parking is allowed on both sides of the roadway and the prima facie speed limit is 25 MPH. The traffic volume on Rycrest Drive south of Winwood Circle is approximately 616 ADT. \traffic\commissn\agenda\2000\ 1012\Promenade The Woodcrest subdivision was approved by the C~unty of Riverside under two separate tract maps. Approved in January 1987, Tract Map 21561 established a roadway connection between the Woodcrest subdivision and future Promenade subdivision at Winwood Circle just west of Rycrest Drive. The subsequent approval of Tract Map 22208 provided for the completi, on of the remainder of the Woodcrest subdivision west of Rycrest Drive and north of Solana Way. Collective[y, the Woodcrest subdivision has approximately.227 single-fa/nily homes that can potentially generate a traffic volume of 2,270 ADT. This is based on a trip generation rate of 10 triPs per day per dwelling unit. - . The Promenade subdivision (Tract Map 28553) was approved by the City of Temecula in August 1997. At that time, the connection between the two subdivisions was constructed and subsequently the on-site roadway system was dedicated to the city for public use and acceptance into the City's maintained roadway system. The connection between both subdivisions at Winwood Circle was for circulation between the two (2) subdivisions and to serve as secondary emergency access to the orea. This type of "inter-subdivision" access is not uncommon throughout the City.. The Promenade subdivision has approximately 69 single-family dwelling homes, which represents a potential trip generation rate.of 690 ADT..About half of the Promenade homes are on cul-de-sacs and half are along the through streets. In September 2000,' traffic volume data was collected at Georgetown Lane, Winwood Circle"and Rycrest Drive.. This information was used to determine if a significant "cut-through" traffic pattern is present. Directional count data was collected at al! three locations for a period of seven consecutive days. The count data indicates that Georgetown Lane ~ast of Margarita Road carries approximately 488 ADT westbound (outbound from the subdivision) and 609 ADT eastbound (inbound to the subdivision) during the seven-day period. Winwood Circle west of Rycrest Drive carries approximately 244 ADT westbound (inbound to the subdivision) arid 369 ADT (outbound from the subdivision) and Rycrest Drive south of Winwood Circle carries approximately 356 ADT southbound and 260 ADT northbound during the same seven-day period (Exhibit "B"). In addition to the traffic count data collection, a spot speed survey was performed on Georgetown Lane and Carleton Way: The spot speed survey revealed that the 85~ percentile speed on Georgetown Lane is approximately 22 MPH and 24 MPH on Carleton Way. The results show that the opportunity for spe_eding is limited due to the roadw~ty widths and a!ignment constraints (knuckles and "T" intersections) Of the subdivision's roadway s3(stem. The traffic volume data indicates that some "cut-through" traffic does occur within the Promenade subdivision, but the total volumes are half of what would normally be considered significant and they do not warrant a road closure. The majority of the traffic is generated by the Woodcrest subdivision, which uses the route, as it was designed, to access Margarita Road. Staff does not recommend closing Winwood Circle at Rycrest Drive. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments:' 1. Exhibit "A" - Location Map 2. Exhibit "B" - Traffic Volume Data r :\traffic\commissn~\agenda\2000\ 1012\Promenade EXHIBIT "A" LOCATION MAP EXHIBIT "B" tRAFFIC VOLUME DATA .10/02/2000; 08:47 5099248604 CITY OP TI~C~A 01:00 02:00 - 0hO0 04:00 07:00 08:00. 09:00 10:00 11:00 10:00 pi ~1:00 0]:00 0~:00 06:00 07:00 00:00 0~:00 10:00 LI:O0 .Totals SOL COUNTS UNLIMITED INC PA~E · CO,Irt9 IlllLIXlTID, II¢. Pile I.D, : ?DOB~Oltt 0 0 44 63 60 49 . 0 F£i. Sac. ~. #eek A , ? 0 11 1 10 8 } ' 3 I 3 0 0 3 0 i 1 40 40 12 17 lO 1~ 21 44 51 $1 60 5~ 24 661 33 iS . 4! 35 29 12 12 ? 529 1190 43 41 - fl 10 42 3& 49 44 43 47 44 41 31' 41 44 3] 46 39 07 15 5~ 27 52 21 41 31 42 36 50 34 41 10 . 14 25 40 25 08 37 17 11 17 l~ JO 33 13 8 22 10 ~18 535 546 052 613 019 1151 ~96 1102 Day VOI~Se ,0! 10:00 11:00 00:00 07;00 Il:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 )l:OO 03:00 0]:00 02:00 00:00 Ol:O0 OS:lO 01:00 0S:00 01:00 10/02/200~ OBJ.?- 9095248604 t2:00 &u · 2 OhOD 4 03:00 L ) 0 05:00 O&:O0 2 01:00 24 52 24 O8:OO 09:O0 22 n 2¢ 10:00 21 25 ' 10 lhO0' 20 17 '3t. t2:00 p~ 02:50 04:00 05:00 07:00 08:00 0t:00 10:00 lhOO 35 26 ' SB 23 GO 31 5O 20 ? OOUNTs UNLIMITED Nod,. 0 0 2 0 4 4 3Q )t 27 ~4 42 48 21 02 22 41 22 27 22 20 '13 .5 ~ 0?8 -1OBB ~ur, TtL Sat. 0 0 0 3 41 0 O D 0 $ 1 14 2 0 1 1 4 42 49 40 25 48 40 40 45 25 1194 21 O 25 13 5 lO 5 ~ 3 S 507 4~8 638 ~17 Avg. Day ~4,70- 91.11 90.2% 17.3% 95.51 90.11 102.0t lOS,l% 100.50 108.40 AN Peaks 0B:00 07:00 Il:00 07:00 08:00 01,:00 t0:00 0?;0O 07:00 07;00 Volume 11 52 39 51 i1 $3 33 41 4! 40 .O% Q~ ~e~6 03:00 03~00 13:00 03:00 03:00 03:00 02:00 02:00 O~:O0 02:00 Volute 03 ~! 6~ SO ~0 4~ ~0 SO iS 40 ,O% tOT8 PAGE ,03 ' Site Code: 151232. Slut Date: OWI8IIDiO 2 O 0 ' 28 50 20 21 2~ 24 ~i 42 52 23 11 0 1112 ,Or 01:00 03:00 Q):O0 t0/8~/2000 ' COUNTS UNLIMITED INC P~ 84~ ~ CIT/ O! ?~IC~L4 22:00 am 02:00 O~:O0 04:00 ~05:00 01:00 08:00 09:00 * LO:Q0 22:00 12:00 pm 02:00 Ot:QO 05:00' 01:00 08:00 09:00 lO:OO 11:00 ?orals t 0 0 0 k~9. Day AN Peaks Volume m Peaks .Or ,0! .00 ¢OUMS UlbI#I18D~ INC. WBND Sat. Su~. 0 ? 1 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 ¢ 2 I 1 2~ 0 6 11 '25 25 . 20 Site Code: 1512K Start Date: 09/1112001 }mae : l leek L.~. 0 1 3 2 2 2' 0 ? I7 20 17 14 23 13 33 21 22 23 21' 39 25 22 23 21 20 21 25 15 30 25 3l 22 18 15 IS 34 14 10 t2 22 22 1) 32 21 17 22 22 il 21 20 2 2{ lS l& ~ 1S 9 4 9 32 6 I 10 2 IG 12 ) B 261 358 2}4 327 221 312 252 ' 614 452 548 ,00 88.9{ ?¢.22 lll.Ot 1'01.50 96.22 n6,6{ l?,gt 11:00 11:00 Ol:lO 07:00 1D:O0 10:00 Il:00 10:OQ il:00 lO:§0 4s 26 47 21 39 25 {4 25 3l - ~§10212~00' 0e;47 9e99248504 ~, _ COUNT~ UNt. ZNzTED ~NC' PAGE B5 ? DAY DIIIBCTIOIIAL VOLUIq{ Be~in ~ 12:00 al 0~:00 0~:00 H:O0 05:00 06i00 07:00 09:00 10:00 · ~t~O0 0 15 ? -19 I0 Tues. #e~. .2 0 1 0 0 0 '0 · O O 0 2 '1 ~0 11 10 11 0 1 0 I 2 9 5 18 17 11 q0UIITS ~]LI#ITID, IJC. 0 O 0 0 0 1 2 3 19 it' } 10 12 12:00 pm 21 12 18 1~ 19 11 20 t 01:00 22 11 21 12 19 11 2? 26 02:00 17 14 45 19 41 21 10 17 0]:0~ )2 20 ]I 24 18 11 29 17 04:00 33 11 31 I1- 34 II 3] 18 04:00 41 16 34 lO tO 24 29 21 07:0~ 21 12 Il H 14 13 3~ 1~ 08:00' ID 3 19 12 it _ 5 ll 10 09:00 9 5 lO 9 1S S 15 8 iO:O0 I - 3 i I ] ] 3 3 ll:O0 - 3 0 3 0 3 I t 2 I? l O 1 O 1 29 ~ 12 36 20 20 14 2~ 21 r 35 21 ' 30 le 9 ' 381 247 Sire'Code: 1S12Sl Start Date: o0/18/2000 PAO8 : 2 weet Avg. I 0 I O O 1 21 19 22 19 21 l0 * 22 15 dO ]l 2O 14 9 2 372 0 607 l~J, Day t00.fl IN Peak0 0?:00 Volume 1~ Peaks 0O:00. ti.Il I02.4{ 105.5t }B.}9 }9.5%' 95,11 }V.0% 102.4! lOS.It 0?:00 ll:O0 04:00 08:00 04:00 07:00 06:00 07:00 04:00 22 24 22 24 2] 19 19 27 22 03:00 O2:00 O]:Og 02:00 OS:O0 02:00 Ol:O0 02:00 05:00 .0! 0! .0~ 01:00 Ot:O0 22 20 02:10 Ot:GO 40 20 18/02/200~ 00:47 Be~ia 12:00 aa' Ol:O0 02:00 03:00 04:00 05~00. 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00' 22:00 12:00 pi 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 01:00 00:00 09:00. ri:oD Totals ¥oluae Voluee 0 · 0' 0 0 .00 .0~ .Or G~U~$ L~IMITED INC ! 2 0 21 17 23 22 22 &5 17 35 23 3S 2~ 23 15 11 2 0 2 1 5 t~ 20 ~S 23 19 2~ 22 17 Start Date: 09/11/2000 4 2 ~ 2 ( 1 7 1 3 · 1 1 0 1 1- ) 0 1 ) 0 3 2 2 2 ! 1 4 i 2 lO 12 S 1 11 20 lS 20 16 20 16 29 te il: 2) 22 29 1~ 23 . 20 ]9 13 22 2i ~0 2 ¢ 9 10 2 ~ ~ 7 ~72 ',0% ?0.~% ?9.St 105.90 111.4i 125.5~ lll.lt I1.20 11:00 ll:00 08;00 Ol:00 10:00 00:00 Il;00 11:00 17 . 17 lO 39 12 61 16 29 03:00 OJ:O0 02:00"02:00 .06~00 Ol:O0 IS;0O 0~:00 09:00 00:00 19 24 06;00 03:go 24 )¢ i0/02/~0~0 08:4? . 9855248684 ' COD'ITS UILI#lf~l), IIIC, ¢ITY.OP~LI 70AY OIRl~IO~ VOL~B CO~'f Tues. 12:00 am 1 ) 0 '01:00 '. 0 . 1 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 01:00 1: D I 1 '04:00 ) 5 } 3 OS:O0 ~ ~ ~ -0~:0O S 12 4 13 07:00 14 22 20 00:00 24 32 15 28 00:00 i? 16 1] 10:00 ~0 16 10 '11:00 ~ 14 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t 0 O 0 0 8 10 12:00 pm 0t:00 10,~ 21 12 09:00 15 3) 14 06:00 23 38 0 07:00 15 30 0 0 00:00 09:00 8 8 0 0 ~O~OQ S 4 0 0 ii:D0 I I 0 24 11 8 8 221 - 211 ~ 0 29 22 22 0 31 11 13 13 10' 13 15 18 28 30 30 ~ 22 13 21 1S 101 16& 104. ~87 Sat, 2 . ! 1 0 4. 5 11 -20 14 2~ 24 17 39f 0 ?OS 0 rite C~e: 151270 Scant Date: 09114/2000 Pile I.D. : lalk ivg, SB~ 1BIB 18 10 ' ,11 25 11 11 t 11 12 15 22 21 2) 2! 10 B 11 2S0 . lJ( Peaks 01:00 08:00 voh~e .18 32 DN Pe~8 '03:00 03:00 Volum~ ' 2& tO ~TS . O?:OO oe:oo lz:oo l0 28 0 03:00 02:00 Ol;O0 02:00 19 13 ~4 120,41 112,5t 122,fl 116.31 01:00 09:00 01:00 08:00 29 31 22 35 05;00 03:00 OS:O0 03:00 .0~ .00 lt' 2S Q4:QO '03:00 ITEM NO. '3 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: 'AGENDA REPORT Public/Triffic Safety Commission Ali Moghadam, P,E. Engineer, Traffic Senior October 12, 2000 Item 3 Wolf Creek Project Circulation Plan RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file a presentation regarding the W61f Creek Project Circulation plans· BACKGROUND: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer will make a presentation to the Pt~blic/Traffic Safety Commission regarding the Wolf Creek Project Circulation plan. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachment: · 1. Circulation Plan · · 2. Public Works Conditions of Approval :n~laL2000\ 10/_12/wol f creek agn/ajp · W°lf Creek LEGEND I CIRCULATION PLAN 134' uRBAN ARTERIAL 1~, ~ (PORTION OF pALA R.Oi ~ ~0' naXv. PaXL maawnl . (eORTXO~ OV PXL~ aO/C , 110 MODI~'IED SECOND~ OVOLV V^L~¥ ROA~) 88' SECONDARY ItlGIlWJ (leAIRVIEW ROAD)' 85' MODLVL~D RESIDENT' COLLECTOR STREET RNTERIOR Prepared For Spring Pacific Properties L Page 111-13 Figure III-3 ATTACHMENT 2 PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL r:~traffic\cormaissn\agcnda~2000\ 10/12/wolf creek agn/ajp PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government AgenCY. It is understood that the Developer con'ectly shows on the tentative site plan all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement Constraints and drainage courses, and their omission will subject the project to further review and may requ re rev sion. GENERAL CONDITIONS 16. All utility systems such as electric including those wh ch provide direct service to the project site and/or currently exist along public rights-of-ways adjacent to the site (except electrical lines rated 33 ky or greater), gas, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be placed underground,-:with easements .provided as required, and designed-and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. ~ 9. Prior to the issuance of any grading p~rmit, as deemed necessary by the Department of PublicWorks, the Developer shall consult with the State of California Department of Fish · ,- and Game, U.S. Army corPs of Engineers, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to determine if permits or approvals are necessary from such agencies for any action contemplated by this proposal. Such consultation shall be in writing, and copies of said correspondence, including responses from agencies, shall be submitted to the City. Where appropriate, the terms, conditions, and recommendations of the noted agencies shall be incorPorated as Conditions ~)f Approval into the areas of development. 20. .Landscaping and permanent irrigation facilities' shall be installed with street improvements. Perimeter walls, where required, shall be treated with graffiti-resistant coating and shall be · installed adjacent to street improvements within each phase. 21. A phasing plan addressing the schedule of necessary infrastructure requirements shall be approved by the Department of Public Works and the Planning Director prior to approval of '* any subsequent application. * 22. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 ~)f the Temecula Municipal Code and alt Resolutions implementing chapter 15.06. CIRCULATION 23. 24, Adequate pdmary and secondary access shall be provided for each phase of development as approved by the Department of Public Works. Access to office and commercial areas shall be reviewed by the Department of Public Works at the time of submittal of individual development applications. Additional rights-of-way at entries to the aforementioned sites may be required to provide for turning lanes as directed by the Department of Public Works. The exact location and number of access points shall be subject to review and approval by the Department of Public Works upon future tentative map'and/or development plan approvals. · 25. All street sections shall correspond with Typical Roadway Cross Sections and requirements of the Circulation Element of.City's General Plan, City ordinances and standards or as approved With the Wolf Creek Specific Plan. ~:~Public~Data~Projects~Bany's JobsN27-008 Wolf Cmek\COA-SP.d'oc 4 26. All intersection intervals shall comply with City standards and requirements. 27. The Developer shall provide bus bays and shellers within'the Specific Plan. Location and humber of bus Days shall be subject to approval of thelCity and R/veto/de Transportation Agency (RTA). Additional rights-of-way dedications associated with bus bays shall be provided by the Developer. 28. Necessary improvement~ have been/will be conditioned based on the project traffic s{udies and the conceptual ;~hasing ;~lan shOWn on Section II1. 8. of the Specific Plan. Any substantive rephasing of the develooment must be approved by the Planning and Public Works Director.through a-rephasing application. Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits within any phase 'all on and offsite improvements as referred to in the Traffic Reports and subsequent addenda along with addllional requirements set herein, Or as setby conditions on individual tracts, must be constructed and/or bonded as required by the Department of Public Works, 29. Ensuing Traffic Reports, analyzing traffic impacts associated with subsequent development stages'of the Specific Plan, shall be submittedto identify implementation and timing of the ne.cessary improvements to mitigate cumulative traffic impacts. 30. If the City has a Capital Improvement Project to design and construct Pala Road from Rainbow Canyon Road to Fairview Road to its ultimate config~iration including environmental mitigation, the Developer shall pay their fair share and reimburse the City for their street improvement obligation. DRAINAGE 31.: Drainage and flOOd control facilities shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of the City and/or Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD). 32. 33. Pdor to approval of any subsequent development applications, the Developer shall submit the master drainage plan to the City and RCFC&WCD to r~view the adequacy, of'the proposed:and existing downstream drainagefacilities. Drainage facilities within'each phase shall be constructed immediately after the completion of the site grading and prior to or concurrently with the initial site development within tha~ phase. 34. 35: All drainage.facilities shall be designed to convey 100 year storm flows, subject to the approval of the Department of Public Works and RCFC&WCD, as applicable.. Th~ Developer shall construct the proposed on and offsite drainage facility improvements and the interim detention basin provision as recommended in the Specific Plan and Drainage'Study documents and/or as directed by the Department of Public Works and RCFC&WCD. as applicable. 36: As required by the Department of Public Works, additional Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports shall be submitted with subsequent development applications to study the drainage impacts and analyze necessary measures to mitigate the runoff created as part of the development of this project. 37. H:~Pub[ic~Daia~Projects~Sar~s Jobs~427-O08 Wolf Creek\COA-SP doc 5 The Developer shall accept and propedy dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site., 38. The Developer'shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage p.attems; Le., concentratiOn or diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by ~- ~ constructing adequate drainage facilities, inc uding'en arging existing facilities or by securing drainage easements. ' WATER AND SEWER .... '. 39. Water and-sewer facilities shal! be installed in accordahce with the requirements and specifications of the City, Rancho Califomia. Water District (RCWD), and Eastern Municipal .Water District (EMWD). Such requirements shall be applied at the sub~livision or plot plan stages of the development;' 40. Pd0r to the approval of subSe~l'uent development applications, the Develop.er shall submit '~ ~ the master water plan to RCWD to check for adequacy of the proposed water facilit es The Developer shall obtain written approVal for the water system from RCWD. 41. Prior to the approval of subsequent development applications, th~ Develope~: shall subm t * the master sewer plan to EMWD to check for adequacy of the proposed s~wer facilities. The ' ~ -- Developer.shall obta en approval for the sewer system from EMWD GRADING 42. No grading shall be permitted ~or any development area prior to tentative .map or plot p an approval and issuance of grading permits for the specific area of development. 43. Prior to Final Map recordation~or issuance of GraYling Permit, the Developer is responsible to bond for and construct the traffic signals at the project's accesses, as required, including the associated street improvements, based on traffic signal warrants analysis relative tc~ subsequent tentatiVe maps and/or develop.ment applications. 45. 47. Grading plans' and operatiops shall be in accordance with the'Ur~iform Building Code, City Grading Standards, the recommendations contained in the GeOtechnical Report, or any subsequent reports prepared ,for the project, the conditions of the grading permit, and a(Scepted grading Construction practices and the recommendations and standards specified in the Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) document. Prior to issuance of any'gFading permit, erosion control plans shall be prepared in conformance with applicable City Standards and Subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements._. The' De~;eloper .shall complY, with the requirements of the National PollUtani Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit regulate~ by the State Water Resources Control Board, and the-Storm Water Pollution PreventiOn Plan (SWPPP) implemented, by th& San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board. The site is in an area identified on the Flood lnsura, nce Rate Maps as Flood Zone "A" and is subject to flooding of undetermined depths. Prior to the approval of any plans, the Developer .shall demonstrate that the project complies with Chapter 15:12 of the T~me~:ula Municipal Code for development within Flood Zone "A". Residential subdivisions shall obtain a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) fro. m the Federal Emergency Mar{agement Agency '-(FEMA). Commercial subdivisions may obtain a LOMR at their discretion ' -- H:~Pubiic~)ata~projects~Bar~s Jobs~427-008 V~01f Creek\C(~A-SP.doc A Flood Plain Development Permit'and Flood Study shall be submitted to the Departmeni of Public Works for review and approval: The flood study shall be in a format acceptable to the Department and include, but not be limited to, the followir~g'criteria: a. ' Draipagb and flood pr(~teciion facilities Which will protect all structures by diverting " site runoff to streets or approved storm drain facilities. b. Adequ&te provision shall be made for thee acceptance and 'disposal of surface drainage entedng the property from adjacent areas. The impact to the site from any flood zone as shown on the FEMA flood hazard map and any hece~sary mitigation to. protect the site. - Identify and mitigate impacts.cf grading to any adjacent floodway The location of existing and post development 1.00-year floodplain and floodway shall be shown on the improvement plan. 49. Each subsequent_ application for a pn'ase of de~'elopment shall include a conceptual grading plan to indicate at a minimum: 50. a Preliminary'quantity estimates for gradingI 'c Techniques and methods which will be ~sed to prevent erosion ano sedimentation during and after the grading process in compliance with the City Standards and NPDES requirements. Preliminary pad and roadway elevations. d. Designation of,the borrow or stockpile site location for import/export material. e. Approximate time frames for develop_ment including the identification of areas which will be graded dudng the rainy months. f. Hydrology and hydraulic concem~ and mitigations. Major grading activities shall be scheduled during the dry ~eason wherever 3ossible, or as othenNise approved I:Jy the Department of Public Works. Soils stabilization, which may include revegetation of graded areas, shall occur within 30 days Of completion of grading activities as directed by the Department of Public Works.. 52, 53 The site shall be Watered dudng grading operations to control dust, Temporary drainage and~sediment ~:ontrol devices shall be installe(J as di~:ected by the Department of Public Works. 54 An import/export route shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works prior'to ~ssuance of any'grading permit. The clan shall include limitation to the duration of the grading operation and construction' activities,"a Traffic Control Plan ano a daily time schedule of operations. 55. Prior to issuance of any grading permit, a soils reports shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval, to address engineering, geologic, seismic, and . soils engineering concerns for each tentative map or commercial parcel map for each phase. of proposed development. H:~ublic~Data'Crojects~ar~s Jobs~27-008 Wolf Creek\COA-SP.doc 56. A Geotechnical Report shall be prepared by a'registere, d engineer or engineering gesIogist' and submitted to the Department of public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and identify any geotechnical hazards for the site including location of faults and potential for liquefaction. The report shall include recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. 57. Ali public streets shall be maintained and cleaned if:necessary oma daily basis during grading operation and construction activities. Cash deposit.-letter of credit or posting ~)f bond .to guarantee maintenance of all public rights-of'way affected by the grading opeEatipns and construction activities, shall be posted prior to issuance o[ grading perrq, its 58. If. subsequent Geotechnical and Soils Reports determine that dewatenng of the site is necessary dudng construction, necessary permits (ie. in compliancewith NPDES permit) shall be obtained from appropriate agencies prior to approval of the grading plans. PI~iASlNG 59. Construction of the .development permitted by the ~oecific Plan, including recordation of final subdivision maps, may be carried out in stages provided that, adequate vehicular access is constructed for all dwelling units in each stage of development and further provided that such' development conforms substantially with the intent and purpose of the Specific Plan Phasing Plan 60. Develooment applications shall be submitted foreach planniqg unit in each phase..Total acreage and land uses within each phase shall be substantially in accordan'ce witi~ the' specifications of the SPecific Plan. 61. INFRASTRUCTURE PHASE A a CIRCULATION The following improvements shall be complete prior tothe first~bQilding permit' i. - improve Pala Road from Loma Linda Road to Via Gilbedo (Urban Arterial Highway Standards - 134' R/W) to include dedication of half-width street right-of-way, installation of half-width street improve~nents, paving, curb anP gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (!ncluding but not limited to water and sewer) and a 14 foot wi_de raised landscaped median.. 'i. - Improve Pala Road from Via Gilbert0 to Wolf Valley Road (Arterial H, ighway Standards - 110' R/W) to include dedication of half-width street right-of-way, installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter. .:sidewalk. street lights: drainage' facilities, s~gmng.ano striping, utilities (including but.not limited To water and sewer), ano a 14 foot wide raised - andscaoed median ' iii. Improve Pala Road frown Wolf .Valley Road to Fairview Road to accommodate a 60 foot wide pavement (four vehicu)ar travel lanes including a center turn lane), signing and striping. ~v. Via Del Coronado from Via Cordoba to [.-oma Linda Road {Collector Road Standards - 66' R/W) to include dedication of. half-width stree~ right-of-way . plus twelve feet. installation of the remainder of street imorovements, paving, curb and gutter sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, s~gnmg and striping utilities (in, cluding but not limited to water and sewer) -t:~Public~Data~Projects~Barry's Jobs\427-005 Wolf Creek\COA-SP.doc v. ' In the event that the intedm improvements on Pala Road from Rainbow Canyon Road to Loma Linda Road are not complete pdor to the first building. ' permit, the Developer shall i.mprove Pala Road to accommodate a 60 foot .~ wide pavement (four vehicular travel lanes in(~luding a center turn lane), signing ahd striping. The City may reimburse the Developer for their fair share of the street improvement obligation asdetermined by the Director of Public Works. .- , - vi. · Interior Loop Road from Pala Road to Wolf. Valley Road (Modified Residential Collector Street - 85' PJW) to iriclude dedication of full-width right-of-way, iristallation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) vii. Wolf Valle~, R6ad from the northerly Specific Plan boundary to Pala Road (Modified Secondary Highway - 110' PJW) to include dedication of full-width right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities · '.. ·' (including but not limited to water and sewer). w,. Loma Linda Road from Via Del Coronado to Pala Road (PrincipAl'Collector Highway? 78' RNV) to include to. incl.ude dedication of half-width street right- · of-way plus six feet, installation of half-width street improvements plus six .feet, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). Pdor to the 473r~ Building Permit: ix - An approved funding and implementatioh mechanism/fair share'contdbution program as approvec by the Director of Public Works shall De in place to guarantee the improvement of Pala Road from-Highway 79 South to Loma Linda Roact (Urban Arterial Highway-Standards - 134' R/W) to include acquisition of street right-of-way, installation of street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and · striping and a 1.4 foot wide raised landscaped median. x. Street 'W' from. Interior Loop' Road (North) to Loma Linda Road (Principal Collector Highway - 78' RNV) to include dedication of full-width street right--of- way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights drainage,facilities,, signing and stnping, utilities (ir~cluding but not limited to water and sewer) b, DRAINAGE i·, Construct backbone channel and/or drainage facilities an~ all associated~ improvements per Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and the C. ity of Temecuia requirements for the following: .(1) Pala Road north of Wolf Valley .(2) _Wolf Valley Road from the portherly Specific Plan boundary to Pala Road (3) (4) (5) Loma Linda. Road from Via Del Coronado to Pala Road Interior Loop Road (North) from Wolf Valley Road to Pala Road Street !'A" from Interior Loop Road (North) to Loma Linda Road Interior storm drain facilities H:~P u blic~Data~Projects~Barr~ s Jobs~427-008 Wolf Creek\COA-SP.doc 9 62. WATER AND SEWER i. Install water mains per RanCho ~alifomia Water District re~luirements and:** sewer'mains per Eastern Municipal Water Distdct requirements-for the following roadways: ' ,, · (1) Pala Road north of Wolf Valle~, Road : (2) Wolf Valley Road from the northerly Specific Plan boundary t(~ Pala (3) Interior Loop Road (North) from Wolf Valley Road to Pala Road (4) Street "A" from In. tedor Loop Road (North) to Loma Linda Road (5) Intedor Loop Road (NOrth) (6.) Interior facilities- TRAFFIC 'SIGNALS ii. 'Prior to the first building ~3ermit, the developer shall install a traffic signal with ' ~onduits for future intemonnect at the following intersecfionsi' (1). . Pala Road and Loma Linda Road (2) Pala Road and W01f Valley Road including'provisions for a dual · southbound left turn pocket from Pala Road to Wolf Valley Road (3) Pala'Road and Intedor Loop Road (North)' Prior to the 100~" Building Permit, the following signal shall be installed and operational: (1) ' Pala Road and Clubhouse Drive · ('2) .Pala Road and Muirfield DriCe INFRASTRUCTURE PHASE B The'following improvements st~all be cdmplete prior to the 823'rd building permit .a~ CIRCULATION' ... i. improve Pala .Road from Wolf Valley Road t°* Fairview Road (Ar~edai .Highway S(andards - 110' R/W) to include dedication of haif-width street right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and 'gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), and a 14 foot wide raised landscaped, median ii, Interior Loop Road (South) from Wolf Valley Road to Pala Road (Mod fled, : Residential Collector Street & 85' R/VV) to include dedication of full-width right-of-way, installation of full-width Street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk', street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) . iii. Prior to the opening of ihe High School or the 1557th building permit, the .Developer shall improve Fairview Road from Pala Road to the Specific Plan .. ,: boundad/((Secondary Road Standards - 88' R/VV):to include dedication of .. half-width right-of-way, 'installatidn of half-width street improvement's, paving, ' cum and gutter; sidewalk, street lights, ·drainage facilities, .Signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) H:~Public~Data~Projects~am/s Jobs~427-008 Wo~f Creek~COA-SP.doc - 63. b.' · DRAINAGE Construct .backbone channel and/or drainage facilities and all associated improvements per Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation Distdct and the City of Temecula requirements for the following: (1) Pala R(~ad from WOlf Valley Road to Fairvlew Drive (2) Intedor Loop Road (South) from Wolf Valley Road to Pala Road (3) Fairview Drive from Pala Road.to the Specific Plan boundary (4) Intedor storm drain facilities c. WATER AND SEWER i. Install water mains per Rancho Caiifoimia'Water District requir~mems and sewer mains per Eastern MUnicipal Water District requirements for the following roadways: (1) Pala' Road from Wolf Valley Road to Fairview Drive (2) Interior Loop Road (South) from Wolf Valley Road to Pala Road (3) Fairview Ddve from Pala Road to the Specific Plan boundary (4) Intedor facilities d. TRAFFIC SIGNAL The following traffic signal shall be installed and operational with conduits for future ~nterconnect at the following intersection: 'i. Prior to the 823'" Certificate of Occul~ancy (1) Wolf Valley Road and Interior Loop Road (South) ii. Prior to the 1,$$7m Certificate of Occupancy or oPening of theHigh School, whichever ~)ccurs first (1) Pa!a. R0ad and Intedor Loop Road(South)-_ -_ (2) Pala Road and Fairview Road An approved funding and implementation mechanism/fair share COntribution'program such as a City administered community facility district may be considered'in lieu of completed' Improvements for Public Works COnditions as follows: · COA # 61 -INFRASTRUCTURE PHASE A, a..CIRCULATION, i., ii., ix, · COA # 61 - INFRASTRUCTUR,EPHA, SEA' b. DRAINAGE. i · COA#61-1NFRASTRUC~UREPHASEA, d. TRAFFICSIGNALS. i. andii. · COA # 62- INFRASTRUCTURE PHASE B. a.*CIRCULA TION, L Regardless ifa financing mechanism is established, no occupancies will be allowed that will result in a service level of less than "D" on Pala Road. or at any of the Pala Road 'intersections from Rainbow Canyon Road to Wolf Valley Road. 'Added by Plan~ing'Commission, September 20, 2000) ' H:~Public~Data\Projects~ar~y's Jobs~427-008 Wolf Creek\COA-SP,doc. Table 12 Future Traffic Conditions Without and With the Project · * '" * Level of Service Level of Service without Proi~ct with Proiect · Traffic - . Intersection · ControP ' a.m. p~m. a.m. ' ~p.m. 1-15 Fwy SB Ramps at SR 79S TS ' ~' C' D D D 1-15 Fwy. NB Ramps at SR 79S TS i B C B C Bedford Court at SR 79S ' TS i B B · C C La Paz St. SR 79S' TS' ' ~ ~ C C' C' D Pala Rd. at: , ' SR-79 '* TS J ' C Rainbow Cyn. Rd. TS i C D , D . B B B C Clubhouse Dr. TS ' . B A B C Mudield Dr. TS B A B C Loma LJnda Rd. · TS, , C B C C Via Consuelo .TS !'. A A B b · Wolf Valley Rd. TS ~ B B B ..~ -, D Interior Loop Rd. TS :, : - B B Fairview Ave. ' · · TS B . B B · B Pechanga Rd. '. CSS [ A A A A Marqarita Rd. at SR 79 TS D D D D 1. TS-7- T~ttic Sign. al eSS = Cross Street Stop SourCe H~olflZalley Ranch Traffic Impact/lnalysis ~RevisedJ, Temecula. California_ Robert Kahn. John Kain & Associates. December 17. 1998. l'Folf Creek Specific Plan City oJ~ Temecula- 64 Final EIR August 2000 ITEM NO. 4 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: AGENDA REPORT Public/Traffic Safety Commission Ali Moghadam, P.E., Sen~or E~gineer, Traffic October 12, 2000. Item 4 Commission Meeting Schedule - November a~d December 2000 RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission direct the Secretary to cancel and/or re-schedule the regula£ meetings for November and December, 2000, and to perform the appropriate postings and noticing requirements per the Government-Code. BACKGROUND: Staff is recommending that due to the upcoming Veterans Hoiiday Nove~nber 10~, and Thanksgiving Holiday November 23r~' these meetings be consolidated into one (1) meeting on Thursday, November 16, 2000 adjourning to the next regular scheduled meeting of December 14, 2000. Also, during the month of December, the second regular meeting bf the month falls on DeC'ember 2~~. Since this date will be the week between Christmas and New Years, the Commission may consider : ~ . canceling the meeting of December 28, 2000, and adjourning to the next regular scheduled meeting of · January 11, 2001. · ' FISCAL IMPACT: None r:\traffic\commissn\agendaX2000\ 1012\caJendaragn/ajp