Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout091400 PTS AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk at (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting wilI enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] CALL TO ORDER: FLAG SALUTE ROLL CALL: PUBLIC COMMENTS AGENDA TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION TO BE HELD AT CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California Thursday, September 14, 2000 at 6:00 P.M. COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Edwards, Katan, Lanier, Connerton A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Recording Secretary before the Commis§ion gets to that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of July 13,'and July 27, 2000 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of July 13, 2000 1.2 Approve the Minutes of July 27, 2000 r:\tra ffic\commissn\agenda\2000\09 t4Agenda/ajp COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. North General Kearny Road Neighborhood Meeting Status Report RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file the status report on the North General Kearny Road Neighborhood Meeting. 3. Limit Line for Yellow Change Interval at Signalized Intersections RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review and provide input regarding limit line for yellow change interval at signalized intersections. 4. Public/Traffic Safety Commission Meeting Schedule Revision RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission consider the feasibility of holding one (1) regularly scheduled Commission meeting per month. 5. Traffic Enghleer's Report 6. Police Chief's Report 7. Fire Chief's Report 8. Commission Reports ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, September 28, 2000, at 6:00 P.M., Temecula City Hall, Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ITEM NO. 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION JULY 13, 2O0O CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:01 P.M., on Thursday, July 13, 2000, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Bus[ness Park Drive, Temecula, California. FLAG SALUTE The audience was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Cee. ROLLCALL Present: Commissioners Cee, Edwards, Katan, Lanier, and Chairman Connerton. Absent: None. Also Present: Director of Public Works Hughes, Senior Engineer Moghadam, Associate Engineer Gonzatez, Police Chief Domenoe, Police Sergeant DiMaggio, Battalion Chief Ritchey, Administrative Secretary Pyle, and Minute Clerk Hansen. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of June 8, 2000. Police Sergeant DiMaggio relayed that on page 3 of the minutes, in the penultimate paragraph, that the word approximately should be added prior to the phrase 12 hours a week. MOTION: Commissioner Cee moved to approve the minutes, as revised. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Edwards and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. COMMISSION BUSINESS Request for Multi-Way Stop Installation - Honors Drive at Balata Drive/Vardon Drive RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution establishing multi-way stop controls at the intersection of Honors Drive at Balata DriveNardon Drive. Senior Engineer Moghadam provided the staff report (of record), noting that this issue had been agendized due to the receipt of a petition from the Temeku Hills Community residents; relayed that based on a warrant analysis evaluation that this area did not meet the warrants for installation of a multi-way stop sign with respect to the volumes and the number of accidents; advised, however, that based on the sight distance analysis (noting the speeds of 37 MPH, although the speed limit was posted at 30 MPH), that due to the site distance restriction, staff was recommending establishment of an all-way stop at this intersection; and noted that if the Commission recommended the installation, that the project would not be implemented until such time as these particular streets were designated City streets (which could be potentially in approximately 30 days). Chairman Connerton relayed that based on his visit to this particular area, it was his opinion that the all-way stop would, additionally, enhance the safety at the proximate golf cart crossing. MOTION: Commissioner Coe moved to approve staff's recommendation. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lanier and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. Commissioner Coe noted that, historically, this was the City's most expedient Commission approval of a recommendation for a stop sign. 3. In-Pavement Amber LED Flashing Lights for Crosswalks RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review and evaluate the feasibility of installing In-Pavement Amber LED Lights for crosswalks and make a recommendation to the City Council. Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that this item had been agendized due to the request of Chairman Connerton; and noted that representatives from the JTB Supply Company would provide an overview of the In-Pavement Amber LED Lights for crosswalks, incTusive of a video presentation. Chairman Connerton relayed that this product had first been introduced to him via a television program, noting his subsequent further investigation. Mr. Jeff York, representing JTB Supply Company, provided a history of the development of the In-Pavement Amber LED Lights for crosswalks, noting the similarity to airport runway lighting; advised that this product was not designed for signalized intersections due to the plethora of existing lights at intersections, clarifying that it was developed for placement at unprotected crosswalks (i.e., school, or park crossings); relayed that currently there were approximately 15 locations in southern California where this product had been installed and was operational, citing specific locations; provided a video presentation which relayed the statistics related to fatalities of pedestrians in crosswalks, demonstrating the application of the project, noting the visibility of the lights at a distance up to 1500 feet; and provided an actual demonstration of the product for the Commission in the Council Chambers, relaying the activating system, and specifying the typical street installation for the lighting system. For Chairman Connerton, Mr. York relayed that Caltrans had installed the system in various locations in northern California; advised that the device had been approved by the California Traffic Control Commission; further specified the installation process; reiterated that this device was not recommended at lighted intersections, noting the restrictions related to tying the device to the controls at the intersections, advising that he could relay the request for additional investigation for installment at lighted intersections to the company. Ms. Rose Lee Cunningham representing JTB Supply Company relayed that Caltrans would most likely approve the device in approximately December of 2000. In response to Commissioner Edwards, Mr. York relayed that at night, the driver awareness was increased by approximately seventy-five to eighty percent (75-80%) with the installation, noting that during daylight hours awareness was increased by approximately fifty-five to sixty percent (55-60%); advised that the effectiveness of the product was due to the fact that it was pedestrian activated, noting that it was not always flashing. For Commissioner Coe, Mr. York relayed that the closest location of a device was in the City of Orange, providing additional information regarding that site. In response to Commissioner Katan's queries, regarding the effectiveness of utilizing the device as a speed deterrent (i.e., to activate the lighting system when drivers reach a certain speed), Mr. York relayed that the device had been installed preceding a blind crosswalk in order to warn drivers of the coming crosswalk (which was also flashing); provided additional information regarding alternate installations, noting the multi-faceted effectiveness of the device. In response to Commissioner Coe, Police Sergeant DiMaggio relayed that he did not have enough information to provide an opinion with respect to the device; and for Chairman Connerton, noted that the City of Temecula had not had significant negative impacts at unsignalized crosswalks. For Senior Engineer Moghadam, Mr. York relayed that if the device was activated by children at play, the lights would only flash for 20-25 seconds, noting that with the existing installations that there had not been a significant negative impact associated with unnecessary activation of the system. Prior to the data revealing that the device was not developed for lighted intersections, Chairman Connerton relayed that he had had several recommended locations in the City where the device could be effective; noted that the La Serena crosswalk proximate to the school and the park site might be a potential location for this installation; advised that after obtaining additional information that the Commission may at a future date make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the device. Commissioner Coe relayed that the issue could be agendized for a future date, after obtaining the additional data, and identifying appropriate recommended locations for the system. Commissioner Katan relayed that he was impressed with the technology, noting that he could see the merits of recommending installation of the system at an initial location in order to further evaluate the effectiveness. Commissioner Lanier concurred with the need for additional information; queried whether there were other companies manufacturing the system. In response, Chairman Connerton relayed that via the investigation that he had conducted that there was not an alternate similar system. In light of the information regarding the lack of significant negative pedestrian impacts at crosswalks in the City of Temecula, Commissioner Edwards relayed that at this time she would not recommend the installation; noted that for a future date, after additional information was obtained, an appropriate location for the device could be the crosswalk at Rancho Elementary School Chairman Connerton advised that it would be appropriate for the City to take a proactive approach at identifying potential sites for the installation, noting that traffic would be increasing. Commissioner Coe relayed that additional information could be obtained from data with' respect to crosswalks that have been requested to be installed by community residents, that the Commission had subsequently not recommended for installation due to the unsafe aspects of an uncontrolled crosswalk, relaying that the additional investigation may reveal locations appropriate for this type of system. Director of Public Works Hughes noted that the system was still in the initial stages of development; reiterated that Caltrans had not adopted the device as a uniform traffic control device, advising that until that approval, it was his opinion that unless there was a severe negative impact with respect to pedestrian injuries in crosswalks that he would not recommend the installations; provided additional information regarding the goal to minimize conflict points with respect to traffic; and noted that vehicles would not be required to stop for the lighted crosswalks which could provide a false sense of safety for pedestrians. In response to Director of Public Works Hughes' comments, Chairman Connerton relayed that although it was illegal, at times pedestrians crossed the street where there were no crosswalks; relayed that after additional investigation, that it may be shortsighted to not consider the installations at certain locations (i.e., the unprotected crosswalk at La Serena); and relayed that if the Commission at a future date made a recommendation, the City Council would provide specified direction. Commissioner Edwards concurred with filing the data, and obtaining additional information; and noted that she would not recommend installation until Caltrans had approved the device. Chairman Connerton recommended a fact-finding process at this time with respect to this system. While not desiring to ignore the potential of any new device, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed the process of determining the appropriate technical devices to be implemented for addressing traffic impacts. Chairman Connerton relayed that the Commission would receive and file this data, requesting that staff obtain additional information and include updates in the Traffic Engineer's Report; and cohcurred with Commissioner Edwards, that this data could be sought after Caltrans' approval. Commissioner Lanier recommended that when staff obtained additional data, that specific information be investigated regarding the total costs associated with the installations. Chairman Connerton thanked Mr. York and Ms. Cunningham for their excellent presentation. TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT Senior Engineer Moghadam introduced Signal Technician Bill Brown to the Commission, commending his excellent work in the City. Via supplemental agenda material, Senior Engineer Moghadam provided the Commission.a copy of the collision report for the month of June. For Commission Edwards, Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that plans are currently under design for the restriction of all left turns at the Target Center. Chairman Connerton provided additional information regarding the internal modifications to the parking area at the center. POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT Police Sergeant DiMaggio noted that on July 14th, the Police Department would have in force the roving DUI Task Force, and that red light enforcement would also be taking place in the City. Police Sergeant DiMaggio noted the Police Department would be purchasing a new Police Motorcycle. For informational purposes, Police Sergeant DiMaggio relayed that Officer Liggett would be transferring to the Perris Police Department, noting that Officer Matt Hughes would be the new motorcycle Officer taking his place. Chairman Connerton commended the Police Department for the effective direction of the traffic at the City's 4th of July Event. FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT Battalion Chief Ritchey noted that there had been minor vegetation fires in the area. COMMISSION REPORTS Echoing previous comments, Commissioner Lanier commended the Police Department and the Fire Department for their diligent efforts with respect to the successful 4th of July Event. Via community comments, Commissioner Edwards relayed the queries regarding whether or not the Police Department had decreased enforcement in the Via Cordoba area. In response to community comments, Commissioner Edwards relayed queries regarding when the community meeting in the North General Kearny area would be scheduled. For Commissioner Edwards, Fire Battalion Ritchey relayed that there was currently a fundraising event taking place for the Local Chapter of CDF Firefighters. Per citizen request, Commissioner Katan requested staff to investigate the timing at the following signal locations: 1) the Ynez Road signal for left movements into the K-mart shopping center, and 2) the left-hand turning lane on Jefferson Avenue (south) onto Rancho California Road. In response to Chairman Connerton's-queries, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that the caps were intentionally left off the street project in the Ynez Road/Overland Drive area until the development in this area was completed. Chairman Connerton commented on the street widening projects constructed by developers, noting that after the street was capped, the street would be cut across (i.e., for installation of irrigation); and queried whether there could be a more effective schedule mandated. Per the comments of four citizens, Chairman Connerton requested staff to investigate the timing at the signal at Ynez Road into the Tower Center, noting the stacking impacts. ADJOURNMENT At 7:28 P.M. Chairman Connedon formally adjourned this meeting to Thursday, July 27, 2000 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. Administrative Secretary Anita Pyle Chairman Darrell L.. Connerton MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION JULY 27, 2000 CALLTO ORDER The City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:03 P.M., on Thursday, July 27, 2000, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. FLAG SALUTE The audience was led in the Flag salute by Chairman Connerton. ROLLCALL Present: Commissioners Coe, Lanier, and Chairman Connerton. Absent: Commissioners Edwards, and Katan. Also Present: Deputy Director of Public Works Parks, Senior Engineer Moghadam, Associate Engineer Gonzalez, Police Sergeant DiMaggio, Administrative Secretary Pyle, and Minute Clerk Hansen. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. COMMISSION BUSINESS 1. Request for Removal of the Multi-Way Stop Si,qns - Old Town Front Street at 6th Street RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review and consider removal of the existing multi-way stop signs at the intersection of Old Town Front Street and 6~h Street, and make a recommendation to City Council. Senior Engineer Moghadam provided an overview of the staff report (of record), noting that this item had been agendized due to Councilman Roberts' request for review of the feasibility of eliminating the multi-way stop signs at Old Town Front Street/6th Street in order to reduce the diverted traffic volumes on Mercedes Street and to reduce the traffic delay and congestion on Old Town Front Street created from the stop signs; advised that in 1996 when the stop signs were approved that the intersection had not met the criteria for warranting an all-way stop sign, and still did not, noting that one of the conditions for an all-way stop (per Caltrans standards) was for the traffic on the two approaching streets to be equal, relaying that there were approximately 20,000 vehicles on Old Town Front Street, and approximately 600 on 6th Street; noted, additionally, that based on volumes and accidents the stop signs did not meet the warrants; advised that the stop sign installation had been recommended for pedestrian safety, relaying that there were alternate methods for ensuring pedestrian safety (i.e., the flashing LED lighting system for crosswalks); and provided additional information regarding the volumes, and the posted speed limit (25 MPH) in this particular area. For Commissioner Lanier, Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that the traffic diverted to Mercedes Street was in both directions of travel (north and south), noting that the volumes were not a significant impact. In response to Commissioner Coe's queries, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks relayed that the 1st Street Bridge project would most likely be completed at the beginning the year 2001; and relayed that the Western Bypass Project was being considered with the land development applications being setforth from property in that area, relaying that the estimated time for initiation of this project would be in approximately five years. At this time Minute Clerk Hansen read into the record two letters, as follows: 1) A letter received from Mr. G.T. Tucker, owner/operator of the McDonald's in Old Town, stating his opposition to the removal of the stop signs due to the large number of children that use that crossing daily, and 2) A letter received via e-mail from Mr. Karel Lindemans, stating his opposition to the removal of the stop signs, expressing that in his opinion Old Town should be automobile "unfriendly", and that a stop sign should be placed on every street comer. It was noted that a letter had been submitted from Ms. Michele Dawn, representing Rancho Attorney Service, expressing her opposition to the removal of the stop signs, noting her concern with regard to the safety of pedestrians in the area. It was noted that two petitions were submitted, relaying opposition to the removal of the stop signs, one, which encompassed 143 signatures, and one, which encompassed 5 signatures. For the Commission's review a letter was distributed via supplemental agenda material from Mr. Roger W. Epperson, stating his opposition to the removal of the stop signs, noting that the stop signs were effective. The following individuals relayed their opposition to the removal of the stop signs: Ms. Ginny Reynolds n Mr. Jon Nagelsvoorf [] Mr. Thomas Stultz Ms. Judi Scaliatine [] Ms. Linda Brewer Ms. Karen Gray [] Ms. Ed Dool 42097 Via Cuesta Al Sol 28475 Old Town Front Street 32076 Corte Soledad 28465 Old Town Front St~'eet 44113 Northgate Avenue 28465 Old Town Front Street 28464 Old Town Front Street [] Mr. Larry Markham 30105 Cabrillo Avenue [3 Mr. Steve Wheeler 2044 Gird Road, Fallbrook The above-mentioned individuals were opposed to the removal of the stop signs for the following reasons: Relayed that the primary concern was with respect to the safety of the pedestrians, specifically proximate to the public parking lot. Noted the ongoing goal to keep Old Town pedestrian friendly. 3 Advised that children were utilizing this area to cross over to the McDonalds' site. Recommended conducting a pedestrian count of those utilizing this area to safely cross the street. Noted that disabled individuals and senior citizens could more easily cross the street at this stop sign site. Relayed that at the Saturday Farmer's Market Event in Old Town numerous pedestrians utilized this crossing. Advised that the stop sign served as a traffic-calming device. Noted the merchants' past efforts to have the City install the stop signs. Relayed that alternate stop signs in the City of Temecula had been installed which had not met the warrants for stop sign placement. Noted the bus traffic in this area. Relayed the need for additional stop signs in Old Town. Advised that the stop sign aided in the ability to make left tums onto Old Town Front Street during peak hours. In response to Commissioner Coe's queries, Mr. Dool confirmed that unequivocally, pedestrian safety had increased with the placement of the stop signs. Commission Cee commented on the Commission's past decision to recommend the installation of the placement of these stop signs, requesting Mr. Markham to elaborate on his knowledge with respect to this decision. The Commission relayed the followin,q closing remarks: Commissioner Cee noted that he had been on the Commission in 1996, recommending the installation of the stop signs at that time; relayed that Old Town was a unique portion of the City; advised that the stop sign installation had been effective; noted his opposition to Councilman Roberts' request; reiterated that for safety reasons, stop signs had been installed at altemate sites when the criteria for the warrants had not been met (i.e., Via Cordoba); and clarified that he was opposed to removing a stop sign that was extremely effective. Commissioner Lanier relayed that he had visited the site, noting that pedestrians appeared to gravitate towards the crossing at the stop signs; with respect to traffic on Mercedes Street, relayed that based on his investigation that there were no significant impacts regarding cut-through traffic; and concurred with previous comments that the stop signs should not be removed. Chairman Connerton relayed that he had spent numerous hours observing the traffic in this area; noted that on Tuesday, July 25th, during a 30-minute period he had witnessed approximately 600 vehicles entering this intersection, relaying that solely 24 vehicles stopped at the stop sign; advised that the stop sign was not effective, noting that increased enforcement could potentially improve the situation; relayed a concern raised via resident's comments had been regarding the traffic diverted to Mercedes Street, past the Senior Center which made it difficult for the seniors to exit the center; relayed that an alternate complaint had been with respect to traffic at certain peak hours backing up on Old Town Front Street past the post office; advised that the growth in the community/ was contributing to the traffic; noted that this area would be an area for consideration of the installation of the LED flashing lighting system for crosswalks; relayed that if the traffic congestion which backs up past the post office was caused from the placement of these particular stop signs, then he would recommend that there be consideration to relocate the stop signs to 5th Street, placing the lighted crosswalk at 6th Street; provided additional information regarding the lighted crosswalk system; reiterated that the criteria had not been met at this intersection warranting the stop sign placement; and relayed his concern if the stop signs were removed due to the potential increase of the speed of vehicles in the area, and if the stop signs remained due to the fact that if individuals were cited for stop signs violations, the citations could be contested due to the stop sign being unwarranted. For Chairman Connerton, Police Sergeant DiMaggio relayed that citations could be issued for stop signs violations at this intersection, confirming that the citations could be contested due to the unwarranted placement of the stop sign. Chairman Conner'ton recommended that additional research in this area be conducted, suggesting that there be a lighted crosswalk initially placed at 5th Street in order to further evaluate the effectiveness of the system, noting that if the system was effective, that there be consideration for placement of the flashing crosswalk lights at 6~h Street; and relayed his reluctance to support the current stop sign placement which did not meet the warrants, reiterating the restrictions with enforcing stop sign violations. With respect to the fact that these particular stop signs were nonconforming, Commissioner Coe commented on the numerous stop signs located throughout the City, which did not meet the warrants. Chairman Connerton recommended continuing this item until the City Council could consider placement of the LED flashing lighting system for crosswalks in the Old Town area. Commissioner Coe recommended that the stop signs remain at this location, relaying that after completion of the 1st Street Bridge Project this issue could be revisited; noted his concurrence with the recommendation to consider a lighted crosswalk system in this area; and reiterated that he was opposed to removing a stop sign that was extremely effective. MOTION: Commissioner Cee moved to have the stop signs remain at this location, and that the Commission consider the issue again when the 1st Street Bridge Project was completed. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lanier. (Ultimately this motion passed; see below.) In response to Commissioner Lanier's queries regarding the impact of removing the stop signs, Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that in the past, the City had not removed any stop signs, with the exception of for the installation of traffic signals, advising that due to the confusion the removal of the stop signs could create, that generally it was not good practice. Ms. Reynolds recommended that the issue of the seniors' difficulty exiting the Senior Center be considered as a separate issue; and relayed that the traffic congestion that backed up on Old Town Front Street was impacted by the placement of the sign restricting dght turns on a red light onto Rancho California Road during peak hours. At this time voice vote was taken reflecting approval with the exception of Chairman Connerton who voted n_9o. Chairman Connerton relayed that in his opinion there needed to be additional research and evaluation. TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that with respect to the two signal issues relayed by the Commission at the July 13th meeting, that staff had investigated, noting that one of the signals had a faulty detector which had been addressed, and that the alternate signal was effected by the timing of the signal, which if modified would create negative impacts in other areas. POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT Police Sergeant DiMaggio relayed that via supplemental agenda material a Police Department report had been distributed regarding traffic enforcement and Police activity for the month of June. Police Sergeant DiMaggio noted that Officer Matt Hughes would be graduating from the Motorcycle Academy on July 28, 2000, would subsequently have two additional weeks of training prior to being assigned to the Neighborhood Enforcement Team; and for Chairman Connerton provided additional information regarding the additional Police personnel being added to the Department. Chairman Connerton requested that there be increased stop sign enforcement at the Old Town Front Street/6th Street intersection; and requested an update report at the next Commission meeting. FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT No comments. COMMISSION REPORTS A. In response to Commissioner Coe's queries regarding the timeframe for the Pale Road Widening Project, Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that the project was dependent on the timing of the Pachanga sewer improvements in this particular area. Deputy Director of Public Works Parks provided additional information regarding the projects in this area. For Chairman Connerton, Associate Engineer Gonzales relayed that the traffic control plans associated with the project did have provision for maintaining a lane of travel in each direction during construction, noting the phasing of the project. In response to Commissioner Lanier~s comments, Police Sergeant DiMaggio relayed that he could call and obtain the date of the next DUI checkpoint. Chairman Connerton also expressed a desire for the information. In response to Chairman Connerton's queries regarding the depression in the road at Ynez Road/Overland Drive (while traveling towards Margarita Road), Senior Engineer Moghadam reiterated that the street capping was being postponed until the Cosco development had completed its utility roadwork; and advised that there could be a temporary sign installed indicating that there was a dip in the road. With respect to Chairman Connerton's comments regarding newly paved roadways being consistently trenched after being newly paved, Senior Engineer Moghadam provided additional information regarding efforts to minimize the trenching, noting that the City held meetings with the utility companies to coordinate all aspects of a project. Deputy Director of Public Works Parks relayed that the City was in the process of developing an ordinance that would limit the ability to open a trench in freshly paved roadways, clarifying that since these were public streets, at times utilities would be permitted to be installed. ADJOURNMENT At 7:33 P.M. Chairman Connerton formally adjourned this meeting to Thursday. Au(~ust 10, 2000 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. Administrative Secretary Anita Pyle Chairman Darrell L. Connerton ITEM NO. 2 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: AGENDA REPORT Public/Traffic Safety Commission ~--~Ali Moghadam, P.E., Senior Traffic Engineer, September 14, 2000 Item 2 North General Kearny Road Neighborhood Meeting Status Report RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file the status report on the North General Kearny Road Neighborhood meeting. BACKGROUND: At the meeting of June 8, 2000, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission reviewed a concern from the North General Kearny Road residents regarding excessive vehicular speeds and volumes. The Commission approved the staff recommendation to implement Stage 1 of the Neighborhood traffic Calming Program which includes the implementation of the radar trailer, additional enforcement and a meeting with the residents. On August 21, 2000, staff prepared and hand delivered door-to-door, approximately 280 notices advising the residents of the neighborhood meeting. The meeting was held on August 28, 2000, at City Hall Council Chambers. In attendance were Chairman Coimerton, Commissioner Edwards, staffand 8 members of the community. The discussion of the issues resulted in the development of several educational and enforcement alternatives. Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, will present a brief summary of the issues and alternatives discussed at the meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: None r:\traffic\conunissn\agenda\2000\0914\N. Genl Kearny ITEM NO. 3 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: AGENDA REPORT Public/Traffic Safety Commission (~gdi Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer, Traffic September 14, 2000 Item 3 Limit Line for Yellow Change Interval at Signalized Intersections RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review and provide input regarding a limit line for yellow change interval at signalized intersections. BACKGROUND: A request was received from the Public/Traffic Safety Commission to review and agendize the feasibility of striping limit lines at signalized intersections that would serve as a "gage" to drivers of the available time before termination of the yellow change interval. Specifically, the advanced placement of the limit line would advise drivers that if they have not crossed the line after the signals turn yellow they would not clear the intersection during the amber light and they would need to stop at the intersection. While the idea of providing a demarcation line for drivers to assist them in making a decision may have some merit, there are some basic issues that require consideration. The issues are as follows: Standardization One of the difficulties with installing an advance limit line is that it is not a standard application nor is common practice to use limit lines in advance of an intersection, unless the lines indicate a "Keep Clear" zone. Moreover, the California Vehicle Code and Caltrans do not recognize this type of application as a uniform traffic control device. It is very likely that drivers would not understand the intent of the line and would be confused. This may result in some drivers stopping at the limit line believing it is a "stop" bar. Conversely, other drivers would completely ignore the markings. Our research of available data regarding the use of advance limit lines at signalized intersections produced no results. This further indicates that this type of application has not been tested in any other location. It is in the City's best interest to minimize driver confusion by adhering to traffic control devices and markings that are easily recognizable and are standardized. r:\traffic\commissn\agenda\2000\0914\Limit Line for Yellow/ajp Placement Since this is not a standard application, there are no guidelines available for the placement of the advance limit line. In our opinion, prevailing speeds on a particular roadway would dictate the location of the advance limit line. However, the difficulty in using prevailing speeds to determine the location of the limit line is that vehicular speeds will vary during certain times of the day, depending on traffic volumes and congestion levels. The question then becomes, "where should the limit line be placed that will prove to be the most effective for conditions"? In our opinion, the variation in prevailing speeds will make this application ineffective at accomplishing the intent of the installation. Moreover, the placement of the advance limit line based on prevailing speeds that are not consistent, is bound to confuse drivers and could inherently result in an increase in rear-end type collisions. Liability Liability is probably the most important issue when considering the use of limit lines for the yellow change interval. As previously mentioned, because this is not a standard application, there are no guidelines available that would determine when, where and how m apply the advance limit lines. Nor are there any provisions in the California Vehicle Code regarding driver respectability when encountering this type of marking. These two factors alone could create significant liability problems for the City. A companion problem is the potential increase in rear-end and right-angle collision due to the mixed messages that this installation could send. Very aggressive drivers could increase their speed in an effort to clear the intersection and potentially collide with an opposing movement. Another scenario would be a very aggressive drive accelerating to clear the intersection and rear-ending a non-aggressive driver that chooses to stop during the yellow change interval. It is staff's opinion that the majority, if not all, the red light violations are intentional. Therefore, installation of the limit lines would not discourage the drivers from running the red light. As the Commission has discussed in the past, there is a growing problem with drivers blatantly violating red lights throughout the City. It is likely that the installation of an advance limit line would aggravate this problem further by giving drivers the impression that they can clear the intersection, under any condition, if they are at the limit line during the yellow change interval. Although on the surface it may appear that installation of the limit lines are a reasonable application, there are too many technical and liability issues that need to be addressed before even considering a test application for an advance limit line. At this time, staff recommends that the issue be tabled until such an application is recognized as an industry standard and provisions are made for its installation. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: None r:\traffic\commissn\agenda\2000\0914\Limit Line for Yellow/ajp ITEM NO. 4 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: AGENDA REPORT Public/Traffic Safety Commission ~Ali Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer, Traffic September 14, 2000 Item 4 Public/Traffic Safety Commission Meeting Schedule Revision RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission consider the feasibility of holding one regularly scheduled meeting per mot/th. BACKGROUND: At the meeting of March 11, 1999, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission considered and approved holding two (2) regularly scheduled meetings on the second and fourth Thursday of each month. The purpose of the second monthly meeting Was to address and expedite implementation of the selected short-term traffic circulation improvement projects prior to the opening of the Promenade Mall, and to provide an additional opportunity to review related circulation issues that required immediate attention. The short-term circulation improvement projects have been completed and overall circulation and safety issues are addressed in a timely manner. Staff is recommending that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission consider holding one (1) regularly scheduled meeting per month. Should an issue arise that requires immediate attention, the Commission has the option to schedule a special meeting to address the issue. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: 1. Exhibit "A" - Public/Traffic Safety Commission Minutes and Agenda Report - March 11, 1999 r:\traffic\commissn\agenda\2000\0914\meetingschedule EXHIBIT "A" PUBLIC /TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION MINUTES AND AGENDA REPORT MARCH 11, 1999 AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Public/Traffic Safety Commission Ali Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer, Traffic March 11, 1999 Item 4 Public/Traffic Safety Commission Areas of Responsibility RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 1. Review and discuss additional areas of responsibility 2. Consider the feasibility of bi-monthly meetings BACKGROUND: A proposal has been submitted by Commissioner Edwards concerning assignment of each commission member to various specific tasks. As proposed, areas of responsibility could be assigned by the Chairperson in mutual agreement with the Commissioners on an annual basis. The specific areas of responsibility could include closer interaction with the City Council, other City Commissions, various City Departments and community relations. A copy of the proposal is attached as Exhibit "A". It has been suggested by the City Council that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission meetings be held on a bi-monthly basis. This issue has been placed on the agenda for review and recommendation. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachment: Exhibit "A" - Proposal r :\t raffic\commissn\agenda~99\031199\reslmnsibilities/ajp 4.2 Bi-Monthly Meetings Deputy Director Parks suggested that the second monthly meeting be a workshop to address the selected short-term traffic circulation improvement projects. Commissioner Connerton stated that to effectively resolve the City's traffic problems, the Commission needs to regularly meet twice a month. Acting Director Hughes stated that the City's overall thrust is to meet the immediate project list prior to the mall opening and the second meeting is added to have this Commission review the CIP upcoming projects in detail. He mentioned that at the March 23, 1999 City Council meeting, consideration of increasing the compensation for the Public Traffic/Safety Commission to $I00 per month because of the second meeting will be considered. Commissioner Markham noted that the proposed joint workshop session between the City Council and the Traffic/Safety Commission has not yet been held and suggested scheduling it in the immediate future to discuss, among other issues, the present and future role of the Commission. Commissioner Telesio stated that there could be times when review of the priority lists would take only a short time, and therefore other issues should be agendized. MOTION: It was moved by Commissioner Markham that the Public Traffic/Safety Commission's regularly scheduled and noticed meetings will be on the second and fourth Thursday of each month at 6 P.M. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Connerton and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. ITEM NO. 5 TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT APPROVAL ClTY A'I-I'ORNEY DIRECTOR OFFINANCE ClTY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer August 22, 2000 Department of Public Works Monthly Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for the month of July 2000. MOACTRPT · CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report July / August 2000 Prepared By: Staff Reviewed By; Amer Attar Submitted by: William G. Hughes Date: August 22, 2000 PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION 1. First Street Bridge This project will construct First Street from Pujol Street to Old Town Front Street, including the construction of a bridge over Murrieta Creek and the realignment of Santiago Road. The new intersection of First Street, Old Town Front Street and Santiago Road will be signalized. The Contractor has completed the construction of Abutment No. 1 with Pier No. 2 scheduled to be poured by the third week of August. Falsework and channel backfill are scheduled to begin the first week of September. The additional s~rm drain work is underway, with paving operations on the westside of Front Street scheduled for early September. 2. Pala Road Bridge The new Pala Road Bridge is now open to through traffic. The soundwall at Rainbow Canyon/Pala Road is complete. Signal work is complete and functioning. The GTE utility relocation, held-up the rip-rap completion, however, it is now underway. 3. Sports Park Tot Lot Equipment Replacement ~cLaughlin Engineering & Mining, Inc. was awarded the construction contract at the May 9, 2000, City Council MeEting. The Pre-Construction meeting was held on June 7, 2000. Constmction is anticipated to begm in mid September 2000 and end early November. The play equipment was delivered in early August and is being stored until const¢ction. 4. Calle Aragon Park Drainage Structures The project is complete with only punch list items remaining. If the contractor completes the punch list items by August 30, 2000. a s'taff report wdl be forwarded to City Council to accept the project as complete, at the September 12 meeting. 5. Rancho California Sports Park Parking Lot Rehabilitation The project is nearly complete with only punchlist items and striping remaining. The parking lot should be re- opened by the end of this month. R:\MonthlyActivityReporl\C IP\2000~luly 6. FY 99- 2000 Slurry Seal Program Construction started July 5. 2000 and the contractor has placed rubberized slurry seal on all of the designated streets. Punch list items will be complete by August 25, 2000. 7. FY99-2000 Pavement Management System, Various Streets New project to reconstruct roadway pavement on Ynez Road between Santiago Road and Jedediah Smith. Pavement work is anticipated to begin the week of August 21. Completion is expected in mid October. 8. Old Town Parking Lot Trugreen Landscape was awarded the construction contract at the August 8, City Council Meeting. The Pre- Construction meeting will be held in early September. Construction is anticipated to begin in mid September 2000. PROJECTS BEING ADVERTISED FOR BIDS 1. City Maintenance Facility Alterations, Phase III This project will modify the existing two story, masonry block building to accommodate a new second floor of office space over the existing 2 story maintenance bay, including the installation of an elevator, two new second floor restrooms and a kitchenette. Construction will also include a single story masonry block office space addition. Bid opening has been postponed until August 29, 2000. PROJECTS IN DESIGN 1. Murrieta Creek Crossing Between Winchester and Rancho California Road- Low-flow Crossing at Via Montezuma The completed improvement plans were submitted to Riverside County, Flood Control District on August 11, 2000 for 1~ plan review. Project specifications are being prepared and a hydrology study may be required. The construction window is from September through March due to environmental constraints. 2. Pavement Management System, Jefferson Avenue This project will rehabilitate Jefferson Avenue from the northerly Cit?' limits to Rancho Califomia Road. The design process has started. Areas to be rehabilitated will be identified and then plans/specifications will be completed. Design plans will be finis.h, ed by the end of September. 3. Diaz Road Realignment The consultant is currently preparing the improvements plans for 90% submittal. Design plans will be completed during thc month of September. 2 R :~vlonlhlyAetivityReport\ClP\2000kluly 4. Margarita Road Widening, Pauba Road to Dartolo Road The Ci~, returned 90% plan check comments to the consultant for revision. Design plans will be completed during the month of September and the project will be advertised for bids. The City intends to back charge the utility companies for the cost of the potholing. 5. Santa Gertrudis Bridge Widening at 1-15 This is Phase II of the Southbound Auxiliary Lane project at the southbound exit ramp for Winchester Road. This project will widen the 1-15 southbound exit-ramp at the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge to provide an additional lane on the exit ramp just north of Winchester Road. Plan check comments fi-om Callrans were received on June 7th m~d t¥om RCFC & WCD on July 72. The design consultant is scheduled to resubmit plans within two weeks. 6. Traffic Signals Design at Pala Road and Loma Linda, and at Pala Road and Wolf Valley The consultant submitted 90% I'mal plans for both traffic signals and the proposed striping plans. Staff is reviewing these plans and in the process ofpreparmg the specifications and bid documents for this project. This project will be advertised for bids in October. 7. Pala Road Improvements- Phase II (79 South to Pechanga Road) The design consultant, DMJM, submitted 70% improvement plans and specifications to the City for review on July 27. 2000. City staff is currently reviewing the plans. The project is funded for design only at this time. DMJ M is proceeding with the work, which includes geotechnical, utility research, environmental, and final design. 8. Pala Road Interim Improvements- (Widening to accommodate four lanes from Bridge to WolffValley) The widening of Pala Road to 58 feet will be completed with the second phase of construction of the Pala Road Trunk Sewer (Pechanga Indians). An encroachment permit was issued for the construction of the trunk sewer line. The interim street improvement plans are complete. Traffic signal/striping plans will be completed by the ,_week of August 21, 2000. Mumeta Development Corporation will be constructing the new trunk sewer/pavement section from Clubhouse Drive to the main entrance of the Pechangn Casino. 9. Rancho California Road Median Modifications at Town Center This project is currently in desigr~ Completion of the design is expected in September. The project will include the closing of the two median openings on Rancho California Road in front of the Town Center while lengthening the left turn lanes at Ynez Road, Town Center Drive, and Via Los Colinas. 10. Sports Park Pond Desiltation This project will clean up the Desiltation Pond in the Sports Park by removing the silt to allow proper drainage downstrcmn. The design plans are essentially complete. An Environmental Mitigation Plan is being prepared by the biologist. This project will be advertised for construction bids in September. 11. Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II (Margarita Road to Showalter Road) The contract xvith Project Design Consultants was approved by City Council at the July l 1, 2000 meeting. The design process has begun and work will be coordinated with design of the libraD., project. The 30% improvement plm~ subnfittal is scheduled to be delivered to the City on October 18, 2000. 3 R:XMonthlyActivityRcport\C IP\20OO~July 12. Senior Center Expansion The expansion will include an addition of 3000 square feet to the existing building. The expansion will be for recreational, office, and meeting purposes. First design plan submittal to the City for staff review is scheduled for August 2000. 13. Temecula Library A full service library, approximately 34,000 square feet in area, will be designed and built on Panba Road, just west of Fire Station #84. This project will provide the community with library resources and services. Design is progressing on schedule. The commattee chose the color pattern of the exterior, the interior and the carpet. Discussion is being finalized on the .type of furnkure and the inspiration garden. Required utilities, grading plans, improvement plans, specifications and cost estimate are forthcoming. The design is scheduled for completion in October 2000. 14. Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Over Murrieta Creek Staff will recommend that an agreement with T.Y. Lin McDamel be approved by the City Council at the August 22 council meeting. The project will consist of mdening the bridge to accommodate six lanes of traffic. Design is anticipated to begin in September and will take approximately nme months to complete. 15. Chaparral High School Swimming Pool The design cornnuttee h~s determined the layout of the 25-Yard x 25-Meter pool at Chaparral High School. The facili~' will include a smaller recreation pool component and a bathhouse with locker room facilities, restrooms and showers. An alternative to add spray-type play equipment will be included in the consU-uction bid. Tho design continues and is expected to be completed in September. 4 R:~MonthlyActivityRepor~\CIP\2000~July ILl I-- LM 14.1 a. _l mO I.- Z 0 O= o (/3 I,- Z ILl I,D 0 13. n o 0 u JO LU Z LU LU 0 ,,.J u jO Z > 0 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer ,~ Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent August 3, 2000 Monthly Activity Report - July, 2000 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of July, 2000: I. SIGNS A. Total signs replaced 41 B. Total signs installed 99 C. Total signs repaired 4 I1. TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 9 0 0 4 Ill. IV. ASPHALT REPAIRS A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs B. Total Tons CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned VI. VII. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations B. Total S.F. STENCILING A. 285 B, 23,209 New and repainted legends L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping 54,690 20 2,560 Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 38 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 39 service order requests for the month of June~ 2000. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 120 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of July, 2000 was $ 6,790.00 compared to $3,269.00 for the month of June, 2000. Account No. 5402 $ 6,790.00 Account No. 5401 $ - 0 - Account No. 999-5402 $ - 0 - CC: Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer- (CIP/Traffic) Greg Butler, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements) Amer Attar, Senior Engineer - (Capital Improvements) Jerry Alegria, Senior Engineer - (Land Development) CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DMSION GRAFFITI REMOVAL MONTH OF JULY, 2000 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 07/01/00 29705 SOLANA REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 07/01/00 LUCKY PAP~ING LOT REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 07/01/00 6TM STREET AT PUJOL REMOVED 140 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 07/03/00 6TM STREET AT PUJOL REMOVED 64 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 07/05/00 NORTH GENERAL KEARNEY AT DEER MEADOWS REMOVED 98 S,F. OF GRAFFITI 07/06/00 39721 RUSTIC GLEN REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 07/06/00 DEER MEADOWS AT TUOLUMNE COURT REMOVED t2 S.F, OF GRAFF1T1 07/10/00 TARGET CENTER REMOVED 103 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 07/10/00 SPORTS PARK REMOVED 210 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 07/11/00 MARGARITA PARK REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 07/12/00 PALM PLAZA REMOVED 1.604 S,F. OF GRAFFITI 07/13/00 26845 YNEZ REMOVED 30 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 07/13/00 27471 YNEZ REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 07/13/00 K-MART REMOVED 145 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 07/1 /0Q 26040 YNEZ REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 07/25/00 MARGARITA AT DE PORTOLA REMOVED 80 S.F. OF GIL~FFITI 07/25/00 C(JRTE ABANILIA AND VIA CAMPANERO REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 07/25/00 MARGARITA AT HWY 79 REMOVED 16 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 07/26/00 29521 DE PORTOLA REMOVED 18 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 07/31/00 CLUBHOUSE AT CREEKSIDE REMOVED 14 S.F. OF GRAFFITI TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED 2~560 TOTAL LOCATIONS 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ITEM NO. 6 POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OFFINANCE CiTY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Jim Domenoe, Chief of Police ~/~ August 22, 2000 Monthly Departmental Report The following report reflects special teams, traffic enforcement and miscellaneous activity occurring during July of 2000. The Police Department responded to thirty-four "priority one" calls for service during the month of June, with an average response time of approximately 8.5 minutes. A total of 1,342 calls for police service were generated in the City of Temecula during the month. ~ Dudng the month of July, the Temecula Police Department's storefront served a total of 337 customers. Fingerprinting services for this month showed eighty-three prints taken, thirty-three people filed police reports, thirty people had citations signed off, eleven oversized vehicle permits and five solicitor's permits were issued. Crime Prevention Officer Lynn Fanene participated in a number of special events and community oriented programs during the month. Officer Fanene conducted six residential security visits and forty-three business secudty visits dudng the month. He conducted eleven new business checks to acquaint himself with the owners and fourteen visits to businesses for crime follow up. He also conducted a neighborhood watch presentation for the La Serena housing tract. Officer Fanene completed his article for the August edition of the Valley Business Journal called "Better Safe Than Sorry? The POP Team of Officers John Anderson and Earl Quinata continued to work on the "Cdme Free Multi Housing" project. The officers are working with two complexes, which are in the final stages of certification. They are also in the process of working to m-certify four complexes that are continuing with the program. Programs conducted this month included Old Town patrols. As a result of this program, five citations were issued and five misdemeanor arrests and one felony arrest was made. This was also the third month that the Old Town Storefrent became operational. This storefront has served as an office for the POP team and has greatly increased their availability to serve the Old Town area. This month the Old Town storefront served sixty-seven customers, seven fingerprints were taken and three oversize vehicle permits were issued. Monthly Departmental Report Page 2 On July 14th, the traffic team conducted the monthly Operation ERACIT DUI program. This month a "roving" patrol was used. This operation resulted in the arrest of two persons for DUI. During this month the Neighborhood Enforcement Program was conducted at various locations throughout the city. During the month of July, 226 citations were issued for hazardous violations, ninety-eight citations were issued for non-hazardous violations and 150 parking citations were issued. Six injury traffic collisions (down 50% from last month), thirty-three non-injury collisions were reported and thirty-two ddvers were arrested for DUI. The traffic team was also instrumental in organizing the 4th of July celebrations for the City. They coordinated the activities at the parade regarding the traffic and pedestrian control and later at the community recreation center. During the month of July, the POP officers assigned to the Promenade Mall handled a total of sixty- six cells for service. The predominant numbers of these calls were for shoplifting investigations. These cells resulted in the criminal arrest and filings on twelve misdemeanors and three felony cases for various offenses. Three citations were also issued. The Temecula Against Graffiti program (TAG) under the direction of Officer Anderson (POP team) conducted a program this month using six volunteers. As a direct result of this program, ten vehicle checks and seven pedestrian checks were made. No violators were observed spraying graffiti. The three school resource officers continue to remain active in their schools. Two new school resource officers completed training this month and will start at their new schools in August. During the past month, the officers assisted with summer school and they conducted counseling sessions with students. Four arrests were made at Chaparral High school for one misdemeanor and one felony offense. One of the suspects involved in the felony incident was an adult and he was booked at Southwest Detention Center. The JOLT program (Juvenile Offender Law Enfomement Program) continues to be a success in part through its youth court program. This program has a total of ninety active cases at this time. The JOLT officer assisted at the summer school sessions and during absences for training. Special Enforcement Team Officers Rich Holder and Mark Krikava handled a total of twenty-one cases. These cases resulted in twenty misdemeanor and twenty-two felony arrests, primarily for narcotics violations. This team continues to work street level narcotics and specialty patrol within the city on a pro-active basis. During this month a fully functioning clandestine methamphetamine laboratory was located in the City which led to two arrests. Volunteers from the community continue to be an integral part of the Temecula Police Department's staff. Under the guidance of assistant volunteer coordinator Gayle Gerrish, the Police Department's volunteer staff contributed 750 hours of service in July. Volunteer assignments include computer data input, logistics support, crime observation (TAG program surveillance), special event assistance and telephone answering duties. The reserve officer program and mounted posse are additional valuable volunteer resources available to the police department. The police department utilizes reserve officers to assist with patrol, traffic enforcement, crime prevention, off road vehicle enforcement and a variety of special functions. Reserve police officers worked a total of 195 hours during the month. A large portion of this time was spent maintaining public safety on the 4th of July at the parade and the community recreation center festivities. The posse contributed 140 hours during the month including the 4~h of July parade.