HomeMy WebLinkAbout01_005 TCSD ResolutionRESOLUTION NO. CSD 01-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNI ~TY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING
SERVICE LEVEL B, SERVICE LEVEL C, AND SERVICE LEVEL
D RATES AND CHARGES WITHIN THE TERRITORY TO BE
ANNEXED TO THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES
DISTRICT AS PART OF THE REORGANIZATION DESIGNATED
AS LAFCO NO. 2000-10-1 (VAIL RANCH) FOR FISCAL YEAR
2001-2002
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES
DISTRICT HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings:
A. Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, effective December 1, 1989, voters
approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District ("TCSD"), to provide
specified services to properties within its jurisdiction.
B. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the TCSD has
prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for services furnished by it, and has
elected to have these rates and charges colIected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the
same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, property taxes
collected within the TCSD in the manner prescribed by Government Code Sections 61765.2 to
61765.6, inclusive.
C. By Resolution No. TCSD 99-13, the Board of Directors of the TCSD adopted
Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting), Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and
Slope Maintenance), and Service Level D (Refuse Collection) rates and charges within the
territory planned to be annexed to the City as part of the reorganization designated as LAFCO
No. 98-14-1 (the "Redhawk and Vail Ranch Reorganization"). The territory included as part of
the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Reorganization was comprised of the Redhawk specific plan area
(the "Redhawk Community") and the Vail Ranch specific plan area (the "Vail Ranch
Community").
D. In the November 2, 1999 consolidated election, the adoption of these rates and
charges was submitted to' the registered voters of the Vail Ranch community as Measure N.
Measure N received approximately 90% approval from the Vail Ranch voters, who were the
only voters to whom Measure N was submitted. This 90% approval far exceeded the two-thirds
approval required under Article XIIID of the California Constitution. The adoption of the rates
and charges was separately submitted as Measure P to the registered voters of the Redhawk
community, who did not approve the rates and charges by the necessary two-thirds vote.
Resos. CSD\01-05 1
E. Subsequent to the adoption of Resolution No. TCSD 99-13 and the approval of
Measure N by the Vail Ranch electorate, the Redhawk and Vail Ranch Reorganization was
abandoned. However, the annexation of the Vail Ranch Community to the City is now planned
as part of the reorganization designated as LAFCO No. 2000-10-1 (the "Vail Ranch
Reorganization").
F. By this resolution, the Board of Directors of the TCSD intends to implement the
rates and charges previously approved for Service Level B and Service Level C by the voters of
Vail Ranch through their approval of Measure N. This Resolution does not increase the rate of
the previously approved rates and charges for these service levels beyond the level authorized
by Resolution No. TCSD 99-13, nor does it revise the methodology for these rates and charges
so as to result in an increased amount being charged to any person or parcel.
G. By this resolution, the Board of Directors further intends to establish rates and
charges for Service Level D upon properties in the Vail Ranch Community at the same level at
which such rates and charges are imposed upon other properties in the TCSD. Pursuant to
Section 6(c) of Article Xlll D of the California Constitution, voter approval is not required for the
imposition or increase of the rates and charges for Service Level D because Service Level D is
a fee or charge for refuse collection service.
H. As part of the Vail Ranch Reorganization, the Vail Ranch Community will be
detached from Riverside County Service Area No. 143 ("CSA 143"). Upon detachment, the
Community will no longer be subject to taxes and charges levied by CSA 143 for the provision
of park and recreation services, median/slope maintenance, and street lighting. The taxes and
charges currently levied by CSA 143 are of a higher rate than those proposed to be charged by
the TCSD, pursuant to this Resolution, and by the City of Temecula, pursuant to its Resolution
No. 01-17. Therefore, a result of the reorganization will be that property owners in the Vail
Ranch Community will experience a decrease in the special taxes and rates and charges that
burden their property.
Section 2. On February 13, 2001, pursuant to Sections 61765.2 through
61765.6 of the Government Code, a public hearing was conducted on the rates and charges
proposed in a report entitled "Report on Rates and Charges for Service Levels B, C, and D of
the Temecula Community Services District with Respect to the Vail Ranch Annexation" (the
"Report"), which report is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. At the public
· hearing, all oral and written objections, protests and comments by any interested person
concerning the proposed rates and charges were heard and considered. Written protests
against the proposed rates and charges were presented by less than a majority of the owners
of the parcels upon which the rates and charges are proposed for imposition.
Section 3, The Board of Directors hereby finds and determines that, based on
the District budget, the rates and charges to be imposed do not exceed the reasonable cost of
the services to be provided to the affected parcels by the TCSD for fiscal year 2001-02.
Section 4. The Board of Directors hereby overrules any and all objections and
protests and adopts the following rates and charges for fiscal year 2001-02 for the services to
be provided by the TCSD for fiscal year 2001-02:
Resos.CSD\01-05 2
1. Service Level B - Residential Street Lights.
$25.68 per improved residential lot
Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance
$129.00 per improved residential lot
Service Level D - Refuse Cellectien. including Recycling and Street Sweeping.
$172.56 per improved residential lot
Section 5. The TCSD shall prescribe, revise and collect such rates and charges
pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2. The TCSD shall collect such rates
and charges at the same time and in the same manner and by the same persons as, together
with and not separately from, the property taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and
charges shall be delinquent at the same time and thereafter be subject to the same delinquency
penalties as such property taxes. All laws applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of
property taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency,
correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, are applicable to these rates and charges,
except for California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831. However, if for the first year
the charge is levied, the real property to which the charge relates has been transferred or
conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien of a bona fide encumbrance for value
has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the first installment of such
taxes appear on the roll, then the charge shall not result in a lien against the property, but
instead shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection.
Section 6. If a property owner subject to these rates and charges questions the
classification of the owner's property for fiscal year 2001-02, or claims that an error has been
made with respect to the implementation of the rates and charges or the application of the rates
and charges to the owner's property for that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the
levy by filing an appeal with the Secretary of the TCSD before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 2001,
pursuant to procedures established'by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the appeal of
classification or correction of errors program.
Section 7. If a property owner subject to these rates and charges believes that
payment of the rates and charges for fiscal year 2001-02 would create a hardship for that
property owner during that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing a
hardship appeal with the Secretary of the TCSD before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 2001,
pursuant to procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the hardship
appeal program.
Section 8. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the
levy and collection of these rates and charges is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Public
Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) and Section 15273 of the State CEQA Guidelines
because the rates and charges are necessary to maintain existing improvements within the
TCSD.
Resos. CSD\01-05 3
Resolution.
Section 9. The Secretary of the TCSD shall certify to the adoption of this
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula
Community Services District this 13th day of February, 2001.
ATTEST:
S u.~sa n_/,W. Oo--r~sf-dMd
.
STATE OF'6A~IFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
Jeffrey E.,Stone
President
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk/District Secretary of the Temecula Community
Services District, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 01-05 was
duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District on the 13th day
of February, 2001, by the following roll call vote.
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
DISTRICT MEMBERS:
DISTRICT MEMBERS:
DISTRICT MEMBERS:
Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone
None
None
~usan W. ~l'ones, CMC
City ~ct Secretary
Resos.CSD\01-05 4
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
VAIL RANCH ANNEXATION
Report on Rates and Charges for
Service Levels B, C and D of the
Temecula Community Services District
With Respect to the
Vail Ranch Annexation
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
PUBLIC HEARING: February 13, 2001
· INTRODUCTION:
Rates and Charges of the Temecula Community Services District
Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula ("City"), effective December 1, 1989, voters approved
the formation of the Temecula Community Services District ("District") to provide specified
services to properties within its jurisdiction previously provided by the County of Riverside
("County"). The boundary of the District is coterminous with the City boundary, and includes all
parcels within the City with the City Council acting as the Board of Directors ("Board") for the
District. The District collects property-related fees and charges ("Charges"). in order to provide
services and maintain the improvements within the District. The District was formed, and
Charges are set and established, pursuant to the Community Services District Law, Title 6,
Division 3 of the California Government Code ("CSD Law").
Each fiscal year, an Annual Levy Report is prepared, filed and approved by the Board. The
Annual Levy Report describes the District, any changes to the District and the proposed Charges
for the fiscal year. The Charges contained in the Annual Levy Report are based on the historical
and estimated cost to service properties within the District. The services provided by the District
and the corresponding costs are budgeted and charged as separate Service Levels and include
all expenditures, deficits, surpluses, and revenues. Each parcel is charged for the services
provided to the parcel.
The District provides residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance,
and refuse collection in numerous residential developments as well as road improvement and
maintenance within specified areas of the District. Pursuant to Government Code Sections
61621 and 61621.2, the District has prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for
residential street lighting (Service Level B), perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance
(Service Level C), refuse collection (Service Level D), and read improvement and maintenance
(Service Level R) services furnished by the District, and has elected to have these rates and
charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time
as,' together with and not separately from, its general taxes in the manner prescribed by
Government Code Sections 61765.2 to 61765.6, inclusive.
The Vail Ranch Annexation
The City Council of the City of Temecula, by its Resolution No. 2000-20, initiated proceedings to
annex certain unincorporated territory known as the Vail Ranch specific plan area (the "Vail
Ranch Community") to the City of Temecula and the District as part of Reorganization No. 00-10-
1 of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County. One element of the
Reorganization will be the assumption by the Temecula Community Services District of the
responsibility for providing certain services to the Vail Ranch Community. A condition of the
Reorganization is the approval of rates and charges to be levied against properties in the Vail
Ranch Community in order to pay for these services.
Report on Rates and Charges Proposed In Connection With the Vail Ranch Annexation
This Report on Rates and Charges ("Report") is prepared and presented to the Board pursuant
to Government Code Section 61621.2, to prescribe Service Level B (Street Lighting), Service
Level C (Perimiter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance) and Service Level D (Refuse
Collection) Rates and Charges for the parcels in the Vail Ranch Community for Fiscal Year
2001-2002.
The territory and properties identified and described in this Report includes parcels within the
Tract Map Nos. 23172, 23173, 23174, 28480, 28832 and Parcel Map Nos. 23780 and 28731.
The legal description of the annexation area is described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached
hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full.
The word "parcel", for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its
own Assessment Number by the Riverside County Assessor's Office. The Riverside County
Auditor/Controller uses Assessment Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify on the tax
roll properties charged for District services.
A Public Hearing is held each year before the Board to allow the public an opportunity to hear
and be heard regarding the District and regarding the rates and charges proposed in this Report.
Following consideration of all public comments and written protests at the noticed Public Hearing
and review of the this Report, the Board may order amendments to the Report or confirm the
Report as submitted. Following final approval of the Report and confirmation of the Charges, the
Board shall order the levy and collection of Charges for Fiscal Year 2001/02. In such case, the
levy information will be submitted to the Riverside County Auditior/Controller and included as
Charges on the property tax roll for the various services provided in Fiscal Year 2001/02.
Voter Approval Pursuant to Article XIII D of the California Constitution
Article Xlll D of the California Constitution requires property-owner or voter approval for new and
increased property related fees. Rates and charges for Service Level D are specifically exempt
from this approval requirement, because these rates and charges are fees or charges for refuse
coJlection services.
At the November 2, 1999 consolidated election, the voters of Vail Ranch approved, with a 90%
yes vote, rates and charges for Service Level B and Service Level C at the same rate as is
proposed by this Report. Therefore, no further voter approval is required for the adoption of the
rates and charges described herein.
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
A. General Description of District Services
The District provides certain property related services consisting of four (4) separate
Service Levels to parcels throughout the District. Each parcel within the Distdct is
charged for the proportional cost of the services attributable to the parcel. Each Service
Level has differing costs depending upon the services provided. All parcels identified
within a Service Level share in the cost of the service. The costs associated with the
service are proportionately spread among all properties within that Service Level to which
the service is provided. The Service Levels are identified as follows:
· Residential Street Lighting
· Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance
· Refuse Collection
· Road Improvement and Maintenance (Not applicable to the annexation area)
B. Vail Ranch Annexation Area Legal Description
The legal description of the annexation area is described and set forth in Exhibit A,
attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full; and includes parcels
within the Tract Map Nos. 23172, 23173, 23174, 28480, 28832 and Parcel Map Nos.
23780 and 28731.
C. Description of Service Levels
The proposed services applicable to residential parcels within Vail Ranch for which the
charges will be imposed beginning Fiscal Year 2001-2002 include: residential street
lighting; perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance; and refuse collection.
Service Level B, Residential Street Lighting - includes all developed single family
residential parcels and residential vacant parcels for which the District provides on-going
servicing, operation, and maintenance of local street lighting improvements. The current
rate for Service Level B is $25.68 per residential parcel and shall be applied to residential
parcels within Vail Ranch beginning Fiscal Year 2001-2002, but excluding those parcels
in Tract Map No. 28832 that are responsible for their own residential street lights through
a Homeowner's Association.
Service Level C, Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance - includes all
developed single family residential parcels and residential vacant parcels for which the
District provides on-going servicing, operation, and maintenance of perimeter landscaped
areas and slopes within the public right-of-ways and dedicated easements adjacent to
and associated with certain tracts and subdivisions.
The level of maintenance required and the associated operating costs will be at an
established rate level within the Service Level C Rates and Charges. Rate Level C-7 is
at a rate of $129.00 per residential parcel and shall be applied to parcels within Tract Map
Nos. 23172, 23173, 23174, 28480, and 28832 beginning in Fiscal Year 2001-2002.
Service Level D, Refuse Collection - provides for the operation and administration of
the refuse collection program including recycling and street sweeping services for all
single-family residential homes within the District. The current rate for Service Level D is
$172.56 per single family residential home (developed residential parcel) and will be
applied to all parcels within Tract Map Nos. 23172, 23173, 23174, 28480, and 28832 that
have been identified as developed with a residential home, beginning in Fiscal Year
2001-2002.
METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
The cost to provide services within Tract Map Nos. 23172, 23173, 23174, 28480, and
28832 will be fairly distributed among each assessable property by the same methods
and formulas applied to all parcels within the various Service Levels of the District.
The following is the formula used to calculate each property's District charges and is
applied to Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting); Service Level C (Perimeter
Landscaping and Slope Maintenance); and Service Level D (Refuse Collection):
Total Balance to Levy/Total Parcels (in Service Level) = Parcel Charge
The following tables (Table I through III) reflect the levy calculations for each Service
Level.
TABLE I
Parcel Charge Calculation for
Service Level B
Property Type
Single family residential
Single family vacant
Parcel
Unit X
Multiplier
Per Parcel
Charge Per Parcel
Parcel = Charge
$25.68
$25.68
1.00 $25.68
1.00 $25.68 Per Parcel
A charge is imposed on all residential parcels, developed or undeveloped. Parks, open
space areas, easements and non-buildable parcels are not subject to the charge.
TABLE II
Parcel Charge Calculation for
Service Level C
Property Type
Single family residential
Parcel
Unit X
1.00
Charge per Parcel
Parcel = Charge Multiplier
$129.00 $129.00 Per Parcel
A charge is imposed on all residential parcels developed or undeveloped. Parks, open
space areas, easements and non-buildable parcels are not subject to the charge.
TABLE III
Parcel Charge Calculation for
Service Level D
Parcel Charge per Parcel
Property Type Unit X Parcel = Charge Multiplier
Single family residential 1.00 $172.56 $172.56 Per Parcel
This charge is imposed only on developed single-family residential parcels that contain a
residence.
DISTRICT LEVY SUMMARY AND PROPOSED CHARGES
Each Service Level within the District provides different and specific services to various
parcels within the District. The rates and charges prescribed for each service and level
of service are proportionately spread to only those parcels that are provided each
respective service (Service Levels).
Table IV below provides general levy information for the various Service Levels within the
entire District for Fiscal Year 2000-2001.
TABLE IV
TCSD Budget and Service Level Summary
For Fiscal Year 2000-2001
District Budget and Charges Adopted in Fiscal Year 2000-2001
SERVICE LEVEL Total Levy Charge Per Total Levy
Budget Levy Unit Units
Service Level B
Residential Street Lighting $351,944 $25.68 13,705
Service Level C
Local Landscaping and Slopes
Rate Level #1 (C-1) $47,886 $46.00 1041
Rate Level #2 (C-2) $93,340 $89.00 1060
Rate Level #3 (C-3) $191,516 $116.00 1651
Rate Level ~ (C-4) $226,100 $175.00 1292
Rate Level #5 (C-5) $0 $70.00 0
Rate Level fl6 (C-6) $0 $225.00 0
Rate Level # 7 (C-7) $0 $129.00 0
Service Level D
Refuse Collection $2,551,817 $172.56 14,788
Service Level R
Road Maintenance
Rate Level #1 (C-1) $7,146 $115.26 75
Rate Level #2 (C-2) $4,572 $121.92 56
Service Levels proposed for Tract Map Nos. 23172, 23173, 23174, 28480, and 28832
beginning Fiscal Year 2001-2002.
TABLE V
Proposed Service Level Charges
For Vail Ranch
Estimate Budget and Charges for Fiscal Year 2001-2002
SERVICE LEVEL Total Levy ! Charge Per Planned Total
Budget Levy Unit Levy Levy
Units Units
Service Level B:
Residential Street Lighting $41,525 $25.68 1,617 1,617
Service Level C:
Local Landscaping and
Slopes $228,201 $129.00 1,769 1,769
Rate Level #7
Service Level D: $305,259 $172.56 1,769 1,769
Refuse Collection
The "Total Levy Units" and the resulting "Charge Per Levy Unit" (shown in Tables IV and
V), reflect a method of apportionment that most fairly apportions the costs of the services
to the parcels in that Service Level.
EXHIBIT A - LEGAL DESCRIPTION
P~ge ! of 5
F~rtBIT "A"
REORGANIZATION TO INCLUDE ANNEXATION OF VAIL RANCH
INTO ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AND
CONCURRENT DETACHMENT FROM COUNTY SERVICE AREAS 143 & 1~12 AND
DETACHMENT FROM ~l'l-IE RIVERSIDE cOUNTY' WASTE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
DlgrRICT
LAFCO 2000-10-1
Three parcels of land situated in thc unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of
California, described as follows:
PARCEL NO. 1
BEOINNING at an angle point on thc existing City of Temecula boundary as described
in a document recorded December 9, 1994 ss Instrument No. 461244, Official Records of
said county, hereinafter referred to as LAFCO No. 88-70-1, said point being thc
intcraection of the southeasterly right-of-wuy line of State Highway 79 (142.00 feet wide)
and thc centcrline of Butterfield Stage Road (I00.00 feet wide) as shown by Tract No.
23172, on file in Book 251 of Maps at Pages 94 through 99 inclusive, records of said
county;
Thence along said City of Temecula boundary and the centerline of said B utlcrfield Stage
Road, South 22°$7'33" East, a distance of 1,016.04 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1
as North 22056'22" West, a distance of 1,016.0,~ feet) to sn angle point on said boundary;
Thence leaving s~id City of Tcroccula boundary and continuing along the ccnterlinc of
Butterfleld Stagc Road South 22~57'33'' East, a distance of 238.79 feet to the northeast
coract of Parcel Map 23780 filed in Book 161 of Parcel Maps at Pages 92 through 99
inclusive, recorda of said county;
Thence continuing along the centerline ofButterfield Slage Road South 22"57'33'' East, a
distance of 55.54 feet to the beginning ora curve concave northeasterly, having a radius
of 2,000.00 feet;
Thence southeasterly along said curve, throush a central angle of 26°25'50'', an arc
distance of 922.60 feet;
Thence continuing along thc centcrline of Butterfield Stage Road South 49°23'23'' East, a
dis~mcc of 1,514.00 feet to the intersection of thc centerlines of Buttcrficld Stage Road
and Nighthawk Pass (88.00 t'oct widc);
KRIEGER STEWART Exmmr,,^,' ~ose2 ors
(continued)
Thence along thc centerlme of Nighthawk Pass South 40°36'32'' West, s distance of
884.29 feet to thc beginning of a curve concave southeasterly, having s radius of 1,000.00
feet;
Thence soi~thwesterly along said curve, also being thc canterline of Nighthawk Pass,
through a central angle of 18~41'~42'', an arc distance o£ 326.24 fe~t;
Thence continuing along the ccntcrlinc of Nighthawk Pass South 210~$'00' West, a
distance of 167.64 feet to thc beginning ore curve concave northwesterly, having a radius
of 1,000.00 feet;
Thence southwesterly along said curve, also being thc canterline of Nighthawk Pass,
through a cantral angle of49°30'49", an arc distance of 864.18 feet;
Thence continuing along the centcrline of Nighthawk Pass South 71025'49'' Wcst, a
disgrace of 130.56 feet ~o the intersection of the eentcrlines of Nighthawk Pass end Vail
Ranch Parkway (100.00 fcct wide);
Thence along the centerlinc of Vall Ranch Parkway South 18°34'1 I" East, a diaL, mca of
13a.68 fcct to the beginning of e curve concave westerly, having a radius of 1,000.00
Thence southerly along said curve, also being the centerline of Vail Ranch Parkway,
through e central angle of 35°16'$8'', an arc distance of 615.80 fe~t;
Thence continuing along thc ccnterline of Vail Ranch Parkway South 16°42'47'' West, a
distance of 101.80 fcct to the beginning of a curve concave westerly, having a radius of
2,500.00 f~t;
Thence southerly along said curve, also being thc centerlinc of Vail Ranch Parkway,
through a ccn~ral angle of 08°26'51", an arc distance of 368,59 feet;
Thence leaving said c~nt. erlinc North 72°21'~4" West, a distance of 719.17 feet to the
beginning of a curve concave northerly, having a radius of a,O00.00 feet;
Thence northwesterly along said curve, through a central angle of 06016'51'', an am
distance of,4~8.49 feet;
Thence North 66°05'03'' West, e distance of 545.80 feet to thc beginning of a curve
concave southerly, having a radius of 1,200.00 feet;
Thence westerly and southwesterly along said curve, through a central anglc of
40°$Y24", an arc distance of 856,40 feet;
Thence South 73°01'33" West, a distanoe of 552.40 feet to the beginning of a curve
concave northerly, having a radius of 1,200.00 feet;
KRIEGER STEWART EXHt-BIT"A" Page 3 of $
(continued)
Thence westerly and northwesterly along said curve, through a central angel of
tt0°$3'24", an arc dls~nce of 856.~,0 feet;
-.Thence North 66°0Y03'' We, st. m distance of 742.19 foot to the beginning, ora curve
con, nyc aoutherly, having a radius of 1,600.00 feet;
Thence westerly along said curve, ff~ough a central angle of 17056'55", an arc dlst~ncc of
501.22 fcet;
Thence North 84°01'$8'' West, a distance of 203.69 feet to thc conterline of Vail Ranch
Parkway and the beginning of a nontangcnt curve concsvc $outhcasterly, having a radius
of 1,000.00 feet, a radial linc to said beginning bears North 44'54'18" West;
Thence northeasterly along said curve, also being along the ccnterlinc of Vail Ranch
Parkway, through a ccntral angle of 06018'25'', an arc distance of 110.08 feet to thc
inlcrscction of the centerlines of Veil Ranch Parkway end Redhawk Parkway;
Thence along the ccnterline of Redhawk Parkway North 38°35'53'' West, a distance of
160.53 fee~ to the beginning of a curve concave northeasterly, having a radius of 630.00
feet;
Thence northwesterly along said curve, also being the centerlinc of Redhawk Parkway,
through a central angle of 17°13'$6'', an arc distance of 189,48 feet;
Thence continuing along the centerlinc of Rcdhawk Parkway North 21°21'57" West, a
distance of 297.87 feet to thc beginning of a curve concavc southwesterly, having a
radius of 1,200.00 feet;
Thence nerthwcsterly along said curve, also being thc ccnterline of Redhawk Parkway,
through a ccniral angle of 34°51'27", an arc distance of 730.05 feet to the interaeciion of
Pasco Parallon end Redhawk Parkwuy;
Thence continuing along thc ccntcrline of Redhawk Parkway North 56°13'23'' West, a
distance of 1,287.57 feet to the southwesterly comer of Ti'act No. 23172 filed in Book
251 of Maps at Pages 94 through 99 inclusive, rcoords of said county;
Thence leaving thc centcrline of Redkawk Parkway and along the southerly linc of said
Tract Bio. 23172 North 33c46'37'' East, a distance of 50.00 fcct to a point on the easterly
right-of-way line of Redhawk Parkway;
Thence continuing along the southerly line of said Tract No, 23172 South 87°0'1'26" East,
a distance of 126.$9 feet;
Thence continuing along thc southerly line of said Tract No. 23172 North 68°58'51" East,
a distance of 3,161.86 £eet to thc southeast comer of Lot 19 as shown by said map;
KI IEGEI ~TEWAI~T ~X~mlT"A"
(continua,i)
Thence leaving thc southerly line of said Tract No. 23172 end along the casterly linc of
said Lot 19 North 16°37'49'' West, a distance of 754.15 feet to t~ northeastcrly comer
~hercof, said comer also being a point on thc northcrly line of said Tract Bio. 23172, also
being, the southcasm'ly right-cf-way linc of State Highway 79 (142.00 feet w/de) and.the .............
existing City of Temecula boundary as described by said LAFCO No. 85-70-1;
Thenoe along the northerly line of said 'l%ct No. 23172, also being the southeasterly
right-of-way linc of State Hi/bway 79 and.thc existing City of Tcmccula boundary North
73°22'11" East (reoordsd in LAFCO No. 88-70-1.as South 73°23'17" West), a distance of
3,609.69 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Contains 629-~ acres, more or less.
PARCEL NO. 2
BEGINNING st thc northwesterly comer of that parcel of land described by Lot Line
Adjustment No. 3942 recorded Septembcr 29( 1997 as Instrument No. 352794, Official
Records of said county, said comer also being a point on thc northerly linc of Tract No.
23172 filed in Book 251 of Maps at Pages 94 through 99 inclusive, records of R/vcrsida
County, also being the southeasterly right-of-way line of State Hil~hwa¥ 79 (142.00 feet
w/dc) and the City of Teme~'ula boundary as described by said LAFCO No, 88-70-11
Thence along thc northerly line of said parcel also being the northerly line of said Tract
No. 23172, the southeasterly fight-of-way line of State Highway 79, and thc cxisting City
of Temacula bcunda~ North 73°22'11.'' East, a distance of 180.00 feet to thc
northeaslcrly corner of said parcel;
Thence at a right angle and along thc easterly linc of said parcel South 16°37'49'' East, a
distance of 225.00 feet to the southeasterly corner thereof;
Thence at a right angle and along thc southerly line of said parcel South 73°22'11" West,
a d/stance of 180.00 feet to the southwesterly comer thereof, said comer also being the
sonthcastcrly corner of that parcel of land described by Grant Dccd recorded September
11, 1996 as Instrument No. 344516, Official Records offs,id county;
Thence along thc southerly line of said parcel 'and continuing South 73°22'11" Weet, a
distance of ll 1.17 feet to the easterly right-of-way line of Redhawk Parkway as shown
by said Map;
Thence alonlt a radial linc South 63°23'04" West, a distance of 66.83 feet to a point on
the westerly boundary of said Tract No. 23172, also being the contorlinc of Redhawk
Parkway and thc existing City of Tcmecula boundary, said point also being the beginning
ox' a non-tangent curve concave northeasterly anc! having a radius of 1,200.00 feet as
shown by said map;
¢
EXI~IBIT "A" Page ~ nfs
(eanfiaued)
Thence northwesterly along said curve, also being ffie westerly boundary of said 'h'act
No. 23172, thc centerline of Reclhawk Parkway, and the existing City of Temccula
boundary, through a central angle of 9°40'38'', an arc distance of 202.68 feet;
Thence continuing along the westerly boundary of said Traot No. 23172, also being thc
centerline of P~dhswk Parkway, and the existing City of Temecula boundary North
16°56'18'' West, a distance of 34.97 feet to the northerly line of said Tract No. 231'/2,
also bein~ the soutbea~erly fight-of-way line of State Highway 79 (142.00 feet wide),
and the existing City of Temecula boundaryi
Thence along the north~ly linc of said Tract No. 23172, also being the, southeasterly
right-of-way line of State Highway 79, mad thc existing City of Temecula boundary North
73°22'I I" East, a distance of 295.33 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Contains 2.,44 acres, more or less.
PARCEL NO. 3
BI~OINNING at the northwesterly comer of that parcel of land descn'bed by Lot Line
Adjustment No. 3910 recorded March 26, 1997 ~ Irmtrumant No. 100451, Official
P, ecore~ of aaid county, said comer also being a point on the northerly line of Tract No.
23172 filed in Book 251 of Maps a Pages 94 through 99 inclusive, records of Riverside
County, also being the southea~:rly right-of-way ]ina of State Highway '/9 (142.00 feet
wide) and the City of Temecula boundary as described by said La, NCO No. 88-70-1;
Thence along the nortberly line of said pared also being the north~ly line of said TI'act
No. 23172, also being the southeasterly fight-of-way linc of Sta~c Highway 79 and the
existing City of Tcmecula boundary North 73°22'11" East, a distance of 283.00 feet;
Thence et a right angle and along thc easterly linc of said parcel South 16037'49'' Bast, a
dlsL~nee of 283.00 feet to the southeasterly comer thereof;
Thence et a fight angle and along the southerly line of said parcel South 73°22'11" West,
a distance of 283.00 feet to the southwesterly comer thereof;
Thence a! a fight angle and along the westerly linc of said parcel North 16°37'~,9'' West, a
distance of 283.00 to the POINT OF BEOINNING.
Con~ains 1,84 acres, more or lcsa.
RAN/blt
LBGALI$f(X)I878.1B
12/21/2000
VAIL RANCH
~EOEHD
~ BOUNDA~
..... ~ C~RUN[
~ PROP~ UNE
~ S~[O ~ EXCLUD~
~OM ~NE~ON.
CITY 07 T~gCU~
REORGANIZATION TO I~CLUDE ANNE~TION OF VAIl,
FROM COUNTY SER~CE AREAS 143 & 152 AND DETACHMENT F~OM
T~ R~RSIDE COUN~ W~TE RESOURCES MANACEME~ DISTRI~
~FCO 2000-10-1, PA O0-O0~l
~l OF TEMECULA ~
~1 BOUNDARY '~L~ ~CITyEXISTINGoF
, TEMECULA
~ BOUNDARY
PARCEL 1
C7
---- STREET C£NTERLIN£
PROPERTY UNE
ICALF. z l"=B0O' ~ SHADED AREA D(CLUDED
FROM ANNEXATION.
8CAIn: ~ '.,-~00'
CITY OF TEMECULA
REORGANIZATION TO INCLUDE ANNEXATION OF VAIL RANCII
INTO THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND CONCURRENT DETACHMENT
FROM COUNTY SERVICE AREAS 14:3 & 152 AND DETACHMENT FROM
THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY WASTE EESOURCES MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
LAFCO 2000-10-1. PA 00-0021
)1 DRAYf~T ]9y:~TAFF C~C'Z~D By:RAN W.O.: B?~'-I
EXHIBIT
IIAI!
~X' w~ ~4~>. PARCEL 1
BOUND~ c~o ~
~ SH~ AR~ ~CLUDED ~/t~~ SCA~: i'=agO'
Y~O~ COU~ SERVIC~ AREAS 143 · l~2 ~D D~ACI~HENT ~0~
3~o2 ~.~ M.. m,~. ~. ~. ~-~-~ THE RI~RSIDE COUNTY Y~TE RESOURCES ~AGEMENT
LAFC0 2000-10-1. PA
EXISTING CITY
OF TEMECULA
PARCEL 2 (SEE;-7 BOUNDARY L /--PARCEL 3 (SEE
DETNL HEREON)/ ~ / DETAIL HE.EON) '
STATE HIGHW,A,Y,,,7g
~ ~ 2 ====================================================================================================================================================================
'~ ~ ~ ~.~:.:.....:.:.....:............:.'......:.....:.:.:......::.....'..:.:.:.¥...::....::~.:...:.:.....:....?.........:......:..:....:.?........:... ::::':::'!:'."'-".'('?:"-':':"?".?.?.i'."~.Y
IIm P.O.B.
~ PARCEL2 PARCEL 3 DETAIL
L~.S_ .... L3.0__._, sc.~: ~'=~oo'
I
LEGIrNO
[ , JJ 1 L.L: 1 LL Ex,s~,~- crrr OF ~,~'CUU,
BOUNDARY
:L~3~ L33 :~ L32 ---- STREEt CENTERLINE
, , PROPERq'Y LINE
PARCEL 2 DETAIL
FROM ANNEXATION.
SCALE: 1%'200'
CITY OF TEMECULA Ex~na~t
K]3~,~]:l REORGA~I2ATI~)N TO INCLUDE ANNEXATION OF VAIL RANCI{
Tg~rA]l~ ,~oo~,~*~'~ INTO THE C~TY OF TEMECULA AND CONCURRENT DETACHMI~NT
FROM COUNTY SERVICE AREAS 14~ & 152 AND DETACItI~ENT FROM
3~ U~;,e~;t~ aw.. ~, C~ ~1.~9-~4-1~0 THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY WAST[; RESOURCES MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
~rco 2ooo-~o-~.. PA O0-002t
COURSE SHEE1
LINE TABLE CURVE,TABI~E "'
LINE LENGTH BEARING CURVE : LENGTH RADIUS DELTA
L1 1018,04 S22'5T33"E C1: 922,60 2000,00 , , 26'25'50"
[_2 ' 238.79 S22'57'33'E C2 326.24 1000.00 18'41 '32"
L3 55,54 S;22'57'33'E C3, 864.18 1000.00 49'.30'49"
L4 1514.00 S49'23'23'E C4. 615.50 1000,00 35' 16'5B'
1_5 884,29 $40'38'32'W C5 368.59 2500,00 8'26'51
L6 167.64 S21'55'00'W C6 438,49 4000.00 6' 16~51'_'
L7 130,56 871'25'49'W C7~ 858,40 1200,00 40'53'24~
LB 134,68 $18'34'11'E C81 856,40 .1200.00 40'53'24'
L9 101.:,80 '" S16'42'47'W 09! 501,22 1600,00 17'56'55'
LIO 719.17 N72'21'5~"W C10~ 110.08 lq,O0, .00 8' 18'2.s"
L11 545,80 N66'OE'O3'W 011 189,48 530.00 17'13'56'
L12 552,40 S73'01'33'W C12 730.05 1200.00 34'51'27'
L13! 742,19 N86'OE'O3'W C13 202.68 1200,00; g'40'38',
L14 203,89 ~ N84'01 '58"W
L.15 160.53. .N.,3 '3.5'53"W
L1 6 297,87= N21~21 '57'W
L17 1287.57 N56' 13'23'W
L18 50,,.0.0 N33'46'37"E
L19~ 126.59 S87'01'26"£
- L20' 3161,86 N{8'58'51'E
[.21 754.15, , N16'3T49"W
L30' 160.00 N73'~'li'E
L32 160.00 S73'22' 11 "W
1.34 66.83 S63'23'04'W
L35 34,97 N16'58'lT'W
L36 295,33 N73'22'11 'E
L40 283,00 N73'22'11 'E
L41 263.00 S16'3T49"E
L42 283,00 ., $73'22°1 l'W
.... L43 283.00 N16'37'49'W
Ku cm CITY OF TEMECULA
REORGANIZATION TO INCLUDE ANNE~tTION OF VAIL RANCH
FROM COUNTY SERVICE AREAS 143 &
u~,~m~ *,~.. m,,,~,. ~ ~2i~. ~s .~-~ THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY WASTE RESOURCES MANAOEMENT DISTRICT
LAFCO 2000-10--1, PA 00-o0~1
LINE %ABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L1 1018.04 S22'ET33"E
[_2 238.79 522'~7'33'E
L3 55,54 S22'57'33'E
L4 1514.00 S49'23'23'E
[.5 884.29 S40'38'32'W
L6 167.64 S21'55'(~0'W
L7 130,56 S71'25'49'W
L9 101.:,80 S16'42'47'W
L10 719.17 N72'21'5~"W
L11 545,80 Nf6'O5'O3'W
L12 552,40 S73'01'33'W
L13! 742.19 N86'O5'O3'W
L14 203,89 NB4'O1'58"W
L.15 160.53 .N.~3~'3,5'53"W
L16 297,87 N21~21 '57"W
L17 1287,57 N56' 13'23'W
L18 50,,.0.0 N33'46'37"E
L191 126.59 S8T01'26"!
. L20, 3161,86 N{8'58'51'E
L21 754.15 N16'3T49"W
I..~. ,2; 3609,68 N73'22'1
L30' 180.00 N73'~'li'E
!_31 225,0,0 S16'57'49"~
L32 160.00 S73'22' 11 "W
L33 211,17 $73'22'11
1.54 §6.83 S63'23'04'W
L35 34,97 N16'56'16'W
L36 295,33 N73'22'11 'E
L40 283,00 N73'22'11 'E
L41 263.00 516'3T49'E
L42 283,00 $73'22'11 'W
.... L43 283.00 N16'37'49"W
CURVE "'
CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA
C1: 922,60 2000,00 ,, 26'25'50"
C2 326,24 1000,00 18'41'32"
C3 864.18 1000.00 49'30'49"
C~ 615.80 1000,00 35'16'56'
C5 368.59 2500,00 8'26'51"
C6 438,49 4000.00 6'16~1'~
C71 858.40 1200.00 40'53'24'
C8: 856,40 .1200.00 40'53'24'
C9! 501,22 1600,00 17'56'55'
ClO= 110.o8 lqpq.oo 8'18 5"
Cll 189.48 630.00 17'13'55'
C12 730.05 1200.00 3~51'27'
C13 202.68 1200.00 8'40'38'
EXHIBIT B- 2001/2002 COLLECTION ROLL
Parcel identification for each lot or parcel within the District shall be the parcel as shown
on the County Assessor's map for the year in which this repod is prepared.
A listing of parcels within this District, along with the charges, has been submitted to the
City Clerk and, by reference, is made par/of this repod.