HomeMy WebLinkAbout030601 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Amedcens with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will
enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104
ADA Title Il]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
MARCH 6, 2001 - 7:00 P.M.
At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER:
Prelude Music:
Invocation:
Flag Salute:
ROLL CALL:
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 2001-05
Resolution: No. 2001-19
Mayor Jeff Comerchero
Kate Welsh
Pastor W. M. Rench of Calvary Baptist Church of Temecula
Councilman Stone
Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone, Comemhero
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Certificate of Achievement to Joshua Duvall for attaining Eagle Scout rank
Wall of Honor Recipient - Grace Mellman
R:~Agenda\030601
1
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on
items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on
an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a
pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For ail Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to
Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item.
There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made
at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the
agenda.
2 Resolution Approvin.q List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
3 City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 2001
R:~Agenda\030601
2
4
6
7
8
Letter of Support for Inter-Regional Planning Project
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Authorize the Mayor to sign a letter in support of a grant application by the San
Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) to establish an inter-regional
planning program for San Diego and Western Riverside Counties.
Award of Contract to Update the City General Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Award the contract to Cotton Bridges Associates in the amount of $340,285 to assist
the City in upgrading the General Plan.
City Street Banner Vendor
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve the contract with Kelley Display, Inc. for an amount not to exceed
$33,000.00 for a 16-month term through Jun 30, 2002.
Acquisition of Tax-Defaulted Property for Open Space Habitat Creation and Preservation
Area and/or Public Park/Pedestrian Access Purposes
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA OBJECTING TO THE PUBLIC SALE OF CERTAIN
TAX DEFAULTED PROPERTY LYING WITHIN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, OFFERING TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY FOR
OPEN SPACE HABITAT CREATION AND PRESERVATION
AREA AND/OR PUBLIC PARK/PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
PURPOSES
Award of Construction Contract for the City Maintenance Facility Modifications - Phase III
- Project No. PW00-16
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Award a contract for the City Maintenance Facility Modifications - Phase III -
Project No. PW00-16 to T & M Construction for $600,000 and authorize the Mayor
to execute the contract;
8.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $60,000 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount;
R:~Agenda\030601
3
10
8.3
Approve a transfer of $80,000 in Capital Project Reserves from the Rainbow
Canyon South Interchange Project to the City Maintenance Facility Modifications -
Phase III- Project No. PW00-16.
Award of Construction Contract for the Margarita Road Widening - Phase I - Prelect No.
PW99-01
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Award a contract for the Margarita Road Widening - Phase I - Project No. PW99-01
- to R.J. Noble Company for $1,266,140.80 and authorize the City Manager to
execute the contract;
9.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $126,614.08 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount;
9.3 Approve an appropriation of $1,650,000.00 from Capital Project Reserves to the
Margarita Road Widening - Phase I Project.
Second Readin.q of Ordinance No. 01-04 (Time and Place of City Council Meetinqs)
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 0t-04
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION NO. 2.04.020 OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE TIME
AND PLACE OF MEETINGS
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF
THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AND
THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
R:~Agenda\030601
4
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. CSD 2001-01
Resolution: No. CSD 2001-06
CALL TO ORDER:
President Jeff Stone
ROLLCALL:
DIRECTORS:
Comemhero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of
Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to
Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of February 27, 2001.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Tuesday, March 27, 2001, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\030601
5
CALLTO ORDER: Chairperson Ron Roberts
ROLL CALL AGENCY MEMBERS:
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. RDA 2001-01
Resolution: No. RDA 2001-02
Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the
Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent
Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the
Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of February 27, 2001.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBERS'REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Tuesday, March 27, 2001, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\030601
6
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
11 Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommendations re.qardin,q Emergency Traffic
Cimulation Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Consider the recommendations of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission and direct
staff to begin implementation of those recommendations.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Tuesday, March 27, 2001, at 7:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers,
43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\030601
7
PROCLAMATIONS
AND
PRESENTATIONS
ITEM 1
ITEM 2
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the
Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby
allowed in the amount of $837,961.22.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 6th day of March, 2001.
ATTEST:
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
Resos 01-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do cedify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 01- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Temecula on the 6th day of March, 2001 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Resos 01-
2
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
02/22/01 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
03/06/01 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 03106/01 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001
120
165
190
192
193
194
210
260
300
310
320
330
34O
GENERAL FUND
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND
RDA-LOW/MOD INCOME HOUSING
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND
RDA-REDEVELOPMENT
INSURANCE
VEHICLES
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
SUPPORT SERVICES
FACILITIES
$ 564,917.04
13,529.95
14,876.26
23,599.34
11.66
5,029.61
99.02
198,723.68
1,837.63
128.28
631.42
12,181.57
207.56
2,188.18
$ 219,863.76
618,097.46
$ 837,961.22
837,961.22
TOTAL BY FUND:
$ 837,961.2~2
PREPARED BY RETA WESTON, ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST
SHAWN NELSON, CITY MANAGER
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
VOUCNRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 9
02/22/01 09:47 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL O
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY -
300 INSURANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
AMOUNT
63,250.05
13,529.95
9,516.59
23,599.34
11.66
5,029.61
99.02
87~652.88
1~837.63
128.28
631.42
12,181.57
207.58
2,188.18
TOTAL 219,863.76
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1
02/22/01 09:47 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
52183
52183
52185
52183
52183
52183
52183
52183
52183
52183
52183
52183
52183
52103
52103
52183
52183
52183
52183
52183
52183
52103
52183
52183
67575
67575
67578
67579
67580
67580
67581
67581
67581
67582
67583
67584
67585
67586
67587
CHECK
DATE
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/16/01
02/16/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
VENDOR
NUMBER
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
001281
000747
004445
004445
004446
004446
004446
000101
002541
003138
004012
VENDOR
NAME
PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE
PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE
PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE
PERB EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE
PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PEHS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE
PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE
PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE
PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS EMPLOYEES' RET[RE
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PEHS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS ~MPLOYEES~ RET[RE
PERS ~MPLOYEES~ RETIRE
PERS ~MPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS iMPLOYEES' RETIRE
D & D COMMERCIAL CONSTR
D & D COMMERCIAL CONSTR
ALHAMBRA GROUP
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC
AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS A
AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS A
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIV
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIV
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIV
APPLE ONE, INC.
BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRV
BELCHER, DANA
CABELLO, ARTURO
CAL MAT
CALIBER 1 PAINTING
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PEHS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERB RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS-PRE
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
RAISED LDSCP MEDIAN REIMB:CHEV
RAISED LDSCP MEDIAN REIMB:CHEV
FINAL LDSCP PLANS:I-15 & 79 S
MEMBERSHIP DUES:JOHN DEGANGE
MEMBERSHIP DUE: GREG BUTLER
MEMBERSHIP DUE:STEVEN CHARETTE
MEMBERSHIP DUES:GREG BUTLER
MEMBERSHIP DUES:SCOTT HARVEY
MEMBERSHIP DUES:BRUCE LEVY
TEMP HELP W/E 02/03 BRUNER
ROCK CENTER MEDIAN REPAIRS
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
REFUND:TENNIS-INTR./ADV.ADULT
PATCH TRUCK MATERIALS
RES IMPROV PRGM:JONES,B & L
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2390
165-2590
190-2390
192-2390
193-2390
194-2390
280-2390
300-2390
320-2130
320"2390
330-2390
340-2390
001-2130
001-2390
165-2390
190-2390
192-2390
193-2390
194-2390
280-2390
300-2390
320-2390
330-2390
340-2390
120-199-4242
210-165-609-5804
001-165-999-5248
001-161-999-5226
001-165-999-5226
001-165-999-5226
001-165-999-5226
001-165-999-5226
001-165-999-5226
001-162-999-5118
001-164-601-5402
190-2900
190-183-4982
001-164-601-5218
165-199-813-5804
ITEM
AMOUNT
26,515.86
651.49
4,835.77
11.61
471.75
98.66
282.59
127.82
26.51
1,003.89
206.19
589.34
140.96
88.59
1.87
18.89
.05
2.00
.36
.92
.46
3.72
1.39
2.65
13,529.95
14,388.30
1,225.85
306.00
120.00
110.00
170.00
35.00
170.00
303.84
1,575.00
100.00
55.00
92.00
2,000.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
35,083.34
27,918.25
1,225.85
306.00
230.00
375.00
303.84
1,575.00
100.00
55.00
92.00
2,000.00
VOUCHRE2
02/22/01
09:47
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 2
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
67588
67589
67590
67591
67591
67591
67591
67591
67591
67591
67591
67591
67591
67591
67591
67591
67591
67591
67592
67~93
67593
67594
67595
67596
67596
67597
67598
67599
67599
67599
67599
67600
67600
67600
67600
67601
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
000484 CALIF ASSN FOR LOCAL EC ANNUL MEMBERSHIP DUES:O~GRADY 001-110-999-5226
002520 CALIF T'S BY TRANSCEND T-SHIRTS FOR TEM POLICE DEPT 001-170-999-5371
002710 CHAMPLAIN PLANNING PRES PLN COMMISSIONERS SUBSCRIPTION 001-161-999-5228
003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS
003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS
003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS
003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS
003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS
003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS
003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS
003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS
003021 CINEULAR WIRELESS
003021 CIN6ULAR WIRELESS
003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS
003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS
003021 ClNGULAR WIRELESS
003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS
003021 CINGULAR WIRELESS
004123
004123
003681
001669
001380
001380
003665
COOKSY, CATHY
CELL FEB CELLULAR PHONE SVCS
CELL FEB CELLULAR PHONE SVCS
CELL FEB CELLULAR PHONE SVCS
CELL FEB CELLULAR PHONE SVCS
CELL FEB CELLULAR PHONE SVES
CELL FEB CELLULAR PHONE SVES
CELL FEB CELLULAR PHONE SVCS
CELL FER CELLULAR PHONE SVCS
CELL FEB CELLULAR PHONE SVCS
CELL FEB CELLULAR PHONE SVCS
CELL FEB CELLULAR PHONE SVCS
CELL FEB CELLULAR PHONE SVCS
CELL FEB CELLULAR PHONE SVCS
CELL FEB CELLULAR PHONE SVCS
CELL FEB CELLULAR PHONE SVCS
001-120-999-5208
001-140-999-5208
001-161-999-5208
001-162-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
280-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
001-163-999-5208
001-164-601-5208
001-164-602-5208
001-164-604-5208
001-165-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-110-999-5208
001-150-999-5208
REFUND:BABY BOPPERS MOM & ME 190-183-4982
D L PHARES & ASSOCIATES MAR SATELLITE OFFICE RENT 001-170-999-5229
D L PHARES & ASSOCIATES CAM CHGS FOR SATELLITE OFFICE 001-170-999-5229
DAVIDSON & ALLEN~ ARCHI DESIGN SVC:SR CTR REIMB ITEMS 210-190-163-5802
DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO SUPPLIES FOR GRAFFITI REMOVAL 001-164-601-5218
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 02/09 RUDELL
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 01/12 HERR
001-140-999-5118
001-162-999-5118
EMERITUS COMMUNICATIONS JAN LONG DISTANCE PHONE SVCS 320-199-999-5208
ESPOSITO, BETH
000478 FAST SIGNS
000478 FAST SIGNS
000478 FAST SIGNS
000478 FAST SIGNS
REFUND:BABY BLASTERS MOM & ME 190-183-4982
FAC IMPROV PRGM:ROMANS SEW/VAC 280-199-813-5804
TCSD TRUCK LETTERING W/SEAL 190-180-999-5214
SALES TAX 190-180-999-5214
SIGN:TEM VENDOR PARKING ONLY 190-180-999-5244
000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
001-165-999-5230
001-1990
001-161-610-5250
001-150-999-5230
000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO LOT BOOK REPT: BEETO
165-199-999-5250
ITEM
AMOUNT
75.00
545.85
95.00
110.96
118.92
477.12
815.08
681.90
110.57
198.25
241.34
204.73
107.74
53.87
470.58
402.05
315.12
63.85
25.00
1,150.00
511.73
332.04
47.~4
1,504.76
1,671.93
1,737.42
25.00
1,032.99
30.60
2.30
173.57
10.52
23.46
15.55
12.20
150.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
75.00
545.85
95.00
4,372.08
25.00
1,661.73
332.04
47.84
3,176.69
1,737.42
25.00
1,239.46
61.73
150.00
67602 02/22/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XX-3083 NAGGAR:UNITED/SUBSCRIP 001-100-999-5228 132.00
VOUCHRE2
02/22/01 09:47
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 3
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CNECK
AMOUNT
67602 02/22/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
67602 02/22/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
67602 02/22/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
67602 02/22/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
XX-3083 NAGGAR:UNITED/SUBSCRIP
XX-0902 O'GRADY:CALED/PROF MTG
XX-0902 O~GRADY:CALED/PROF MTG
XX-6702 MEYER:ROCKY COLA CAFE
001-100-999-5258
001-110-999-5260
001-110-999-5258
280-199-999-5260
256.00
78.78
450.00
20.50
937.28
67603 02/22/01 001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
001-150-999-5250
105.00
105.00
67604 02/22/01 FOX, DAWN
REFUND:BABY BOPPERS MOM & ME 190-183-4982
50.00
50.00
67605 02/22/01 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY DAY TIMER SUPPLIES-PLANNING 001-161-999-5220
120.40
120.40
67606 02/22/01 002141 GELS, PAUL
RECOVERED 2 MOTORCYCLE SEATS 001-170-999-5214
124.00
124.00
67607 02/22/01 003815 GFB FRIEDRICH & ASSOCIA
67607 02/22/01 003815 GFB FRIEDRICH & ASSOCIA
67607 02/22/01 003815 GFB FRIEDRICH & ASSOCIA
67607 02/22/01 003815 GFB FRIEDRIDH & ASSODIA
67608 02/22/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT
67608 02/22/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
67608 02/22/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
67608 02/22/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
67608 02/22/01 00017-/ GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
67608 02/22/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
67608 02/22/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
67608 02/22/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
67608 02/22/01 00017-/ GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
67608 02/22/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
67609 02/22/01 000175 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFI
DEC SVCS:MARGARITA RD PW99-01
DEC SVCS:MARGARITA RD PW99-01
DEC SVC:MARGARITA RD PW99-01
DEC SVC:MARGARITA RD PW99-01
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-TCSD
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-TCSD
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-CRC
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-MUSEUM
40 STEEL CHAINS FOR CITY HALL
SALES TAX
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-MUSEUM
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-SR CTR
CREDIT:OVERCHARGED FDR CHAIRS
SALES TAX
ADD'T DUES PER FEE SCHEDULE
210-165-706-5802
210-165-713-5802
210-165-706-5802
210-165-713-5802
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-182-999-5220
190-185-999-5220
340-199-701-5242
340-199-701-5242
190-185-999-5220
190-181-999-5220
340-199-701-5242
340-199-701-5242
001-140-999-5226
46.47
4.41
1,739.97
165.03
269.97
402.35
189.43
160.49
625.00
46.88
75.24
72.01
145.20-
10.68-
230.00
1,955.88
1,685.49
230.00
67610 02/22/01 GRAY, ARLENE
REFUND:COOKING-AMAZING CHEFS 190-183-4982
10.00
10.00
67611 02/22/01 001609 GREATER ALARM COftPANY I ALARM MONITORING SVCS:POLICE 001-170-999-5229
60.00
60.00
67612 02/22/01 003342 HABITAT FOR HUMANITy 00-01 COMM SVC FUNDING AWARD 001-101-999-5267
67613 02/22/01 003670 INLAND OVERHEAD DOOR CO BAY DOOR REPAIRS @ STATION 84 001-171-999-5212
5,000.00
112.50
5,000.00
112.50
67614 02/22/01 004079 JENKENS & GILCHRIST JAN HR LEGAL SERVICES
001-130-999-5247
141.00
141.00
67615 02/22/01 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC ROD RUN BANNERS FOR OLD TOWN 280-199-999-5271
158.52
158.52
67616 02/22/01 KHALED, MOHAMMAD
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900
67617 02/22/01 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS INC MISC POOL SUPPLIES - CRC 190-186-999-5212
67617 02/22/01 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS INC MISC POOL SUPPLIES - CRC 190-186-999-5212
67617 02/22/01 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS INC CREDIT:DUPL PAYMENT 190-186-999-5212
67618 02/22/01 LANGFORD, CRYSTAL REFUND: PICNIC SHELTER RENTAL 190-183-4989
100.00
118.49
39.69
43.04-
30.00
100.00
115.14
30.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4
02/22/01 09:47 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
67619
67620
67621
67621
67621
67621
67622
67622
67623
67623
67623
67623
67623
67623
67623
67623
67623
67623
67624
67625
67626
67627
67628
67628
67629
67629
67630
67630
67630
67630
67631
67631
67631
67632
67633
67634
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
LAVALLEE, MARCIE
REFUND:EXERCISE-KUNDALINI YOGA
003286 LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVI JAN SVCS-LIBRARY SYSTEM AGRMT
003726 LIFE ASSIST INC
003726 LIFE ASSIST INC
003726 LIFE ASSIST INC
003726 LIFE ASSIST INC
SUPPLIES FOR TRAUMA READY BAGS
SUPPLIES FOR TRAUMA READY BAGS
SUPPLIES FOR TRAUMA READY BAGS
SALES TAX
190-183-4982
001-101-999-5285
340-199-701-5212
340-199-701-5212
340-199-701-5212
340-199-701-5212
003777 LINE X OF TEMECULA VALL SPRAY BED LINER:FIRE PRE.TRUCK 310-1910
003777 LINE X OF TEMECULA VALL TOOL BOX FOR FIRE PREV. TRUCK 310-1910
02/22/01 004141
02/22/01 004141
02/22/01 004141
02/22/01 004141
02/22/01 004141
02/22/01 004141
02/22/01 004141
02/22/01 004141
02/22/01 004141
02/22/01 004141
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
MAINTEX INC
MAINTEX INC
MAINTEX INC
MAINTEX INC
MAINTEX INC
MAINTEX INC
MAINTEX INC
MAINTEX INC
MAINTEX 1ND
MAINTEX INC
CRC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
CRC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL CUSTOOIAL SUPPLIES
T.V. MUSEUM CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
MAINT FAC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
TCC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
SENIOR CNTR CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
SENIOR CNTR CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
VAR PARKS CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
CRC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
003669 MARC FAULKENBURY PAINTI RES IMPRV PRGM: NARON
MCCLEARY, DAVID
REFUND:TENHIS-INTR./ADV. ADULT
002887 MCKINLEY EQUIPMENT CORP MAINT FAC LIFT SVC/INSPECTION
190-182-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
340-199-701-5212
190-185-999-5212
340-199-702-5212
190-184-999-5212
190-181-999-5212
190-181-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
165-199-813-5804
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
190-183-4982
340-199-702-5250
003800 MCLAUGHLIN ENGINEERING EEL. RET.:PAVEMENT MGMT:O0-14 210-2035
003935 MELAD & ASSOCIATES
003935 MELAD & ASSOCIATES
02/22/01 004208
02/22/01 004208
NEW MILEAGE RATE
JAN TEMP BLDG INSPECTOR-PALMER
001-162-999-5118
001-162-999-5118
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
MILANOS VAIL RANCH ANNEXATION MTG:2/13 001-161-999-5260
MILANOS HAWESTON DA/SP MTG:2/15/01 001-161-999-5260
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
BUSINESS CARDS: J. DICKEY
SALES TAX
GEN. BUSINESS CARDS:CITY CLERK
SALES TAX
000228 MOBIL CREDIT FINANCE CO
000228 MOBIL CREDIT FINANCE CO
000228 MOBIL CREDIT FINANCE CO
MOORMAN, JAMEE
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01 000775
02/22/01 000718
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
REFUND:EXERCISE-KUNDALIHI YOGA
MUNIMETRIX SYSTEMS CORP 2/1/01-1/31/02 SOFTWARE MAINT
NATIONAL RECREATION &PA ANN'L MEMBERSHIP:PARKER:21539
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-120-999-5222
001-120-999-5222
001-170-999-5262
001-165-999-5262
190-180-999-5263
190-183-4982
320-199-999-5211
190-180-999-5226
43.00
1,199.73
35.20
15.92
4.08
310.00
299.00
39.19
137.05
193.69
78.91
153.40
98.71
9.30
139.70
179.74
17.97-
1,800.00
50.00
106.46
68,763.81
4.46
1,992.48
77.50
77.50
38.25
2.87
38.25
2.87
90.71
18.66
38.98
43.00
480.00
215.00
43.00
62.40
609.00
1,011.72
1,800.00
50.00
106.46
68,763.81
1,996.94
155.00
82.24
148.35
43.00
480.00
215.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 5
02/22/01 09:47 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
67635
67635
67635
67635
67636
67636
67637
67638
67638
67639
67640
67641
67641
67642
67642
67642
67643
67644
67645
67645
67646
67646
67646
67646
67646
67646
67646
67646
67646
67646
67646
67646
67646
67646
67646
67646
67646
67646
67646
67646
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
001584 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM
001584 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM
001584 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM
001584 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM
002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT
002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT
003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S
002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
002668 OMEGA LAKE SERVICES
OUTLAW, SUSAN R.
003762 P M X MEDICAL SPECIALTY
003762 P M X MEDICAL SPECIALTY
002734 P V P COMMUNICATIONS IN
002734 P V P COMMUNICATIONS IN
002734 P V P COMMUNICATIONS IN
PALMER, JENNIFER
004074 PARTY CITY OF TEMECULA
003218 PELA
003218 PELA
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
QTY 2500 2001 POCKET CALENDARS 001-120-999-5222
ARTWORK / TYPESETTING 001-120-999-5222
FREIGHT 001-120-999-5222
SALES TAX 001-120-999-5222
JAR VAR. CIP CONSTR.UPDATE ADS 001-165-999-5256
JAN DISPL. ADS:DICKENS HOLIDAY 280-199-999-5254
OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR FINANCE 001-140-999-5220
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAIHT
001-164-601-5214
001-164-601-5214
FEB DUCK POND MAINTENANCE SVCS 190-180-999-5250
REFUND:ADMIN. CITATION #6204 001-161-4255
PARAMEDIC SQUAD SUPPLIES
PARAMEDIC SQUAD SUPPLIES
001-171-999-5311
001-171-999-5311
POLICE MOTORCYCLE HELMET
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
001-170-999-5243
001-170-999-5243
001-170-999-5243
REFUND:PICNIC SHELTER
190-183-4989
RECREATION SUPPLIES FOR MPSC 190-181-999-E301
JAN TCSD PLAN CHECK SVCS
JAN TCSD PLAN CHECK SVCS
190-180-999-5248
193-180-999-5248
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMSURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMSURSENENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
001-100-999-5265
001-164-602-5260
190-181-999-5301
190-180-999-5260
001-150-999-5261
190-180-999-5260
190-180-999-5260
190-180-999-5260
001-2175
001-150-999-5261
190-181-999-5301
190-183-999-5350
001-161-999-5260
001-140-999-5260
190-180-999-5261
001-170-999-5222
001-170-999-5222
001-170-999-5371
001-170-999-5214
001-165-999-5260
269.00
60.00
10.00
24.68
533.80
231.54
19.36
490.69
19.15
800.00
50.00
252.72
12.07
616.00
7.82
45.03
30.00
59.56
900.00
3,825.00
12.36
6.50
15.49
11.99
19.40
25.00
8.98
10.00
30.04
51.44
8.54
16.00
19.47
18.95
7.00
51.59
10.74
24.49
40.00
5.49
363.68
765.34
19.36
509.84
800.00
50.00
264.79
668.85
30.00
59.56
4,725.00
VOUCHRE2
02/22/01
09:47
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 6
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
67646
67646
67646
67646
676/*6
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-140-999-5220
320-199-999-5221
310-1910
001-150-999-5260
001-110-999-5220
ITEM
AMOUNT
.97
42.95
22.42
25.00
6.43
CHECK
AMOUNT
491.24
67648
67648
67648
67648
67648
67648
67648
67648
67648
67648
67649
67649
67650
67650
67651
67651
67652
67652
67653
67653
67653
67654
67655
67656
67657
67658
67659
67660
67661
67661
67662
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
000252 POLYCRAFT
000252 POLYCRAFT INC
000252 POLYCRAFT INE
000252 POLYCRAFT INC
000252 POLYCRAFT INC
000252 POLYCRAFT INC
000252 POLYCRAFT INC
000252 POLYCRAFT INC
000252 POLYCRAFT INC
000252 POLYCRAFT INC
002579 POTAMUS PRESS
002579 POTAMUS PRESS
000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN
000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN
002776 PRIME MATRIX INC
002776 PRIME MATRIX INC
000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST
000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST
000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST
003591 RENES COMMERCIAL MANAGE
000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & RE
001365 RIVERSIDE CO ENVIRONMEN
001592 RIVERSIDE CO INFO TECBN
000955 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF SW
003001 ROSS FENCE COMPANY
SELLERS, MARK
000385 SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO
000385 SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO
002681 SILVER LEGACY RESORT &
10" CITY SEAL DECALS
10" CITY SEAL DECALS
10" CITY SEAL DECALS
10" CITY SEAL DECALS
10" CITY SEAL DECALS
SALES TAX
SALES TAX
SALES TAX
SALES TAX
SALES TAX
001-162-999-5214
001-164-604-5214
190-180-999-5214
001-170-999-5214
001-171-999-5214
001-162-999-5214
001-164-604-5214
190-180-999-5214
001-170-999-5214
001-171-999-5214
10 LAND DEV. INSPECTION BOOKS 001-163-999-5222
SALES TAX 001-163-999-5222
JAN VAR. PUBLIC NTCS:PLANNING 001-161-999-5256
JAN PUBLIC NTC:PA94-0075 001-120-999-5256
JAN CELLULAR SVCS:SR VAN
JAN CELLULAR SVCS:CITY VAN
190-180-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
DUPL BLUEPRINTS FOR LAND DEV
DUPL BLUEPRINTS:S.P. CULVERT
001-163-999-5268
210-190-178-5804
FEB 01-10-40100-2 GEN.KEARNY
FEB VARIOUS WATER METERS
FEB VARIOUS WATER METERS
190-180-999-5240
190-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
O.T. WEED SPRAYING/DEBRIS RMVL 001-164-601-5402
JAN APERTURE CARD DUPLICATES 001-163-999-5250
PLAN CK FEE:AQUATIC CENTER 210-190-170-5804
JAN EMERG. RADIO RENTAL:P.D. 001-170-999-5238
HOLIDAY PARADE PATROL SVC:12/1 001-170-999-5370
RES IMPRV PROM: GARCIA
165-199-813-5804
REFUND:SEE.DEPOSIT:MS01-0293 190-2900
FIRE EXTINGUISHER-TCSD TRUCK
SALES TAX
190-180-999-5214
190-180-999-5214
HTL:ACCELA CONF:TH/KK:4/30-5/4 320-199-999-5258
214.00
214.00
214.00
85.60
128.40
16.05
16.05
16.05
6.42
9.63
274.15
20.56
75.75
22.25
37.92
28.81
98.68
212.85
31.43
1,106.31
718.33
5,000.00
13.80
2,000.00
282.75
218.96
3,340.00
100.00
44.95
3.37
492.80
920.20
294.71
98.00
66.73
311.53
1,856.07
5,000.00
13.80
2,000.00
282.75
218.96
3,340.00
100.00
48.32
492.80
VOUCHRE2
02/22/01
09:47
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 7
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
67663
67663
67663
67663
67663
67664
67664
67664
67664
67664
67664
67664
67665
67665
67665
67665
67666
67667
67668
67668
67668
67669
67670
67671
67671
67671
67671
67672
67673
67674
67675
67676
67677
67677
67677
67678
CHECK
DATE
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
001212 BO CALIF GAS COMPANY
001212 BO CALIF GAB COMPANY
001212 BO CALIF GAS COMPANY
000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEBT CONTR
000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
001546 STRAIGHT LINE GLASS
003828 TANGRAM INTERIORS
000305 TARGET STORE
000305 TARGET STORE
000305 TARGET STORE
TAYLOR WOODROW HOMES CA
004443 TEMECULA LITTLE LEAGUE
004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT
004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT
004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT
004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT
003849 TERRYBERRY COMPANY
002766 THOMAS BROTHERS MAPS
003366 TORAN DEVELOPMENT & CON
003031 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE
004036 U S FLAG ETIQUETTE
004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA
004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA
004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA
001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY I
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
FEB 2-22-057-2226 VARIOUS MTRS
FEB 2'00'397'5059 VARIOUS MTRS
FEB 2'07'626-6063 R.VIBTA SPR
JAN 2-19-999-9442 VARIOUS MTRS
FEB 2-20-140"9299 VARIOUS MTRS
190-180-999-5319
190-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
190-180-999-5319
190-100-999-5319
FEB VARIOUS GAS METERS
FEB VARIOUS GAS METERS
FEB VARIOUS GAS METERS
FEB VARIOUS GAS METERS
FEB VARIOUS GAS METERS
FEB VARIOUS GAS METERS
FEB VARIOUS GAS METERS
190-180-999-5240
190-181-999-5240
190-182-999-5240
190-186-999-5240
190-184-999-5240
190'185-999-5240
340-199-702-5240
CITY HALL PEST CONTROL SVCS
CRC PEST CONTROL SVCS
TCC PEST CONTROL SVCS
MAINT FAC PEST CONTROL SVCB
340-199-701-5250
190-182-999-5250
190-184-999-5250
340-199-702-5250
RES IMPRV PROM: MARTIN
165-199-813-5804
TCSD CUBICLE PEDESTAL FILE 190-180-999-5242
OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PW
OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PW
OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PW
001-163-999-5220
001-165-999-5220
001-164-604-5220
REFUND:ENG DEPOSIT:LD94-234GR 001-2670
FY 00-01COMM SVC FUNDING AWRD 001-101-999-5267
CITY HALL LOCKSMITH SVCS
T.V. MUSEUM LOCKSMITR SERVICES
CITY HALL LOCKSMITN SVCB
PALA PARK LOCKSMITH SVCS
340-199-701-5212
190-185-999-5212
340-199-701-5212
190-180-999-5212
EMP RECOGN SVC AWARDS
001-150-999-5265
SALES TAX FOR INV# 07564121 001-161-610-5250
EMERG REPAIR CITY PROP:6/PUJOL 165-199-999-5250
SUPPLIES FOR PW MAINT CREW 001-164-601-5218
RENEW ANNUL FLAG ETIQUETTE BVC 001-120-999-5250
FEB XXX-O073 GENERAL USAGE
FEB XXX-O074 GENERAL USAGE
FEB XXX-5072 GENERAL USAGE
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
CRC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
190-182-999-5212
ITEM
AMOUNT
910.55
2,563.88
12.53
1,810.82
585.10
87.42
188.67
240.89
4,000.00
210.67
171.91
386.45
56.00
90.00
36.00
40.00
893.48
421.24
115.29
115.29
115.30
90.00
2,000.00
56.79
236.95
25.00
50.00
55.17
193.73
679.75
95.68
60,00
1,787.79
253.42
6,154.82
42.57
CHECK
AMOUNT
5,882.88
5,286.01
222.00
893.48
421.24
345.88
90.00
2,000.00
368.74
55.17
193.75
679.75
95.68
60.00
8,196.03
42.57
VOUCHRE2
02/22/01
VOUCHER/
CHECK
HUMBER
6?679
67680
67680
09:4?
CHECK
DATE
02/22/01
02/22/01
02/22/01
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS IN CITYWIDE TREE TRIMMING SERVICE 001-164-601-5402
003992 WEST LITE SUPPLY COMPAN LIGHT BULBS FOR FIRE STN 84 001-171-999-5212
003992 WEST LITE SUPPLY COMPAN SALES TAX 001-171-999-5212
ITEM
AMOUNT
492.00
219.60
16.47
PAGE 8
CHECK
AMOUNT
492.00
236.07
TOTAL CHECKS 219,863.76
VOUCHRE2
02/22/01
11:41
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 2
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
AMOUNT
501,666.99
5,359.67
111,070.80
TOTAL 618,097.46
VOUCHRE2
02/22/01
VOUCHER/
CHEEK
NUMBER
67683
67684
67685
67686
67686
67687
67687
67688
67689
67690
67690
67691
67692
67692
67692
67692
67692
67692
67692
67692
67692
67692
67693
11:41
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
03/06/01
03/06/01
03/06/01
03/06/01
03/06/01
03/06/01
03/06/01
03/06/01
03/06/01
03/06/01
03/06/01
03/06/01
03/06/01
03/06/01
03/06/01
03/06/01
03/06/01
03/06/01
03/06/01
03/06/01
03/06/01
03/06/01
03/06/01
002187 ANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE V
002541 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRV
004239 FISHER MERRIMAN SEHGAL
004407 INTEGRA ELLIS GROUP
004407 INTEGRA ELLIS GROUP
000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES
000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES
001091 KEYSER MARSTON ASSOGIAT
003286 LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVI
004383 MACKENZIE ELECTRIC INC
004383 MACKENZIE ELECTRIC INC
002256 P & D CONSULTANTS INC
000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS O
000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
000357 RIVERSIDE CO TRANSPORTA
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM ACCOUNT
DESCRIPTION NUMBER
JAN ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES 001-172-999-5255
CONSTRUCTION OF V-DITCH @ 1 ST 001-164-601-5401
50% COMPLETION:OLD TWN THEATRE 210-190-167-5802
APPRAISAL:AUTO MALL PROPERTY
APPRAISAL:AUTO MALL PROPERTY
001-110-999-5248
001-111-999-5248
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SVCS
WORKERS~ COMP PREMIUM
001-163-999-5248
001-1182
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS:HOUSING PRJ 165-199-999-5250
JAN SVCS-LISRARY SYSTEM AGRMT 001-101-999-5285
PRGS PMT #2:SPRTS PRK:OO-19CSD 210-190-174-5804
RET. W/N PMT #2:SPRTS PRK:O019 210-2035
JAN TEMP HELP CARLSON/VIRDEN 001-162-999-5118
10/19-11/15/00 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5288
10/19-11/15/00 LAW ENFORCEMENT 0D1-170-999-5299
10/19-11/15/00 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5298
10/19-11/13/00 lAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5294
10/19-11/15/00 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5303
10/19-11/15/00 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5291
10/19-11/15/00 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5297
10/19-11/15/00 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5281
10/19-11/15/00 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5262
10/19-11/15/00 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5279
FY 00-01 1ST QTR MAINT SVCS 001-164-602-5405
ITEM
AMOUNT
7,531.04
9,885.00
18,000.00
7,500.00
3,000.00
5,250.00
27.83-
5,359.67
10,897.08
103,412.00
10,341.20-
10,712.00
219,120.77
60,809.50
30,220.80
10,0~.60
20,147.20
12,844.00
15f312.00
31,865.60
19,906.22
5,715.19
20,904.82
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
7,531.04
9,885.00
18,000.00
10,500.00
5,222.17
5,359.67
10,897.08
93,070.80
10,712.00
426,014.88
20,904.82
TOTAL CHECKS 618,097.46
ITEM 3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FIN~NCE~
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
March 6, 2001
City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 2001
PREPARED BY:
Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director
Pascale Brown, Senior Accountant 1~
RECOMMENDATION:
as of January 31, 2001.
That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's Report
DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio,
receipts, and disbursements are required by Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004
respectively. Attached is the City Treasurer's Report which provides this information. Also
attached are reports that provide information regarding the City's assets, liabilities, and fund
balances as of January 31, 2001.
The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with Government Code Sections 53601 and
53635 as of January 31, 2001.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
Attachments: 1. City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 2001
2. Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Equity as of January 31, 2001
3. Fund Equity Detail by Fund as of January 31, 2001
City of Temecula
City Treasurer's Report
As of January $1,2001
Cash Activity for the Month of January
Cash and investments as of January 1, 2001
Cash Receipts
Cash Disbursements
Cash and Investments as of January 31,2001
54,286,476
10,452,062
(4,396,197~
$ 60,342,341
Cash and Investments Portfolio:
Type of Investment
Petty Cash
General Checking
· Sweep Account
(Money Market Account)
Beneffi Demand Deposits
Local Agency Investment Fund
Certificate of Deposit
(Retention Escrow)
Various
(Retention Escrow)
Checking Account
(Parking Citations)
Trust Accounts- CFD 88-12
(Money Market Account)
ReseP/e Account- CFD 88-12
(Investment Agreement)
Delinq. Main. Reserve Account - CFD 88-12
Investment Agreement)
Trust Accounts- CFD 98-1
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Account- CFD 98-1
Local Agency Investment Fund)
Trust Accounts-TCSD COPs
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Account-TCSD COPs
investment Agreement)
Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Account-RDA Bonds
Investment Agreement)
Institution
city Hall
Union Bank
Union Bank
(Highmark U.S. Treasury)
Union Bank
State Treasurer
Community Bank
U.S. Bank
Union Bank
U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury)
CDC Funding Corp
CDC Funding Corp
U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury)
State Treasurer
U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury)
Bayedsche Landesbank
U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury)
Bayedsche Landesbank
Maturity/
Termination
Yield Date
n/a $
n/a
4.870 %
n/a
6.372 %
5.560 %
Vadous
n/a
5.880 %
5.430 % 9/1/2017
5.422 % 9/1/2017
5.880 %
6.372 %
5.880 %
6.870 % 10/1/2012
5.880 %
7.400 % 2/I/2013
Contractual/
Market Par/Book
Value Balance
1,500 $ 1,500
312,700 312,700 (1)
185,000 185,000
6,343 6,343
53,094,099 53,094,099 (2)
269,941 269,941
244,087 244,087
3,843 3,843
194,734 194,734
1,531,469 1,531,469
500,000 500,000
16,399 16,399
944,425 944,425
546 546
502,690 502,690
1,085,645 1,085,645
1,448,920 1,448,920
$ 60,342,341
(1)-This amount is net of outstanding checks.
(2)-At January 31, 2001 total market value (including accrued interest) for the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) was $49,063,295,373.
The City's proportionate share of that value is $53,775,624.
All investments are liquid and currently available.
The City of Temecula's portfolio is in compliance with the investment policy. Adequate funds will be available to meet
budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next six months.
City of Temecula
Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Balances
As of January 31, 2001
Cash and investments
Receivables
Due from other funds
Land held for resale
Prepaid assets
Deposits
Fixed assets-not
Total assets
city (t)
CommunEy Community
Services Redevelopment Facilities
Distdct Agency Districts (2) Total
$ 42,662,221 $ 2,356,182 $ 10,693,380 $ 4,630,558 $ 60,342,341
7,067,538 1,337 2,352,016 6,621 9,427,512
1,432,987 19,220 5,059 1,457,266
530,401 2,103,053 2,633,454
121,768 121,768
382,868 382,868
1,298,180 1,298,180
$ 53,495,963 $. 2,376,739. $ 15,148,449 $ 4,642,238 $ 75,663,389
Liabilities and fund equity:
Liabilities:
Due to other funds
Other liabilities
Deferred revenue
Total liabilities
Fund equity:
Contributed capital
Retained earnings
Fund balances:
Reserved (3)
Designated (3)
Undesignated
Total fund equity
Total liabilities and fund equity
$ 1,452,207 $ 5,059 $ 1,457,266
7,584,146 $ 240,218 $ 902,042 4,568,880 13,295,286
508,238 1,007,464 1,515,702
9,544,591 240,218 1,909,506 4,573,939 16,268,254
14,642,419 1,195,787 11,710,453 27,548,659
23,853,241 940,734 1,528,490 68,299 26,390,764
2,975,773 2,975,773
43,951,373 2,136,521 13,238,943 68,299 59,395,136
$ 53,495,963 $ 2,376,739 $ 15,148,449 $ 4,642,238 $ 75,663,389
(1) Includes General Fund, CIP Fund, Gas Tax Fund, and o~er special revenue funds.
(2) Includes CFD 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) and CFD 98-1 0Ninchester Hills).
(3) Reservations and designations of fund balance are detailed on the following pages.
ITEM 4
APPROVAL
City ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE.,.,
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
City Manager .~
Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager.~~~
March 6, 2001
Letter of Support for Inter-Regional Planning Project
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor to sign a letter in support of a grant application
by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) to establish an inter-regional
planning program for San Diego and Western Riverside Counties.
BACKGROUND: Last fall, Mayor Comerchero and Ramona Finnila (Carlsbad City Council
member and Chair of the San Diego Association of Governments), discussed methods by
which we may improve transit service between our regions. This led to a meeting attended by
Mayor Comerchero, Councilmember Pratt, Councilmember Finnila, and staffs from SANDAG,
the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG), the North County Transit District
(NCTD), and the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA).
At the meeting it was noted that there was value in the two regions working together in a
variety of planning matters, including transit planning. Shortly after this meeting, the State of
California Department of Housing and Community Development formally announced funding
for a grant program that would assist regions in preparing plans to achieve a balance of jobs
and housing. This program would assist regions in developing data and plans to achieve a
balance between jobs and housing. The grant should also provide funds to plan mitigation
measures such as improved transit where there is a jobs/housing imbalance. Finally, the grant
would provide a mechanism for policy as well as technical discussions between our two
regions.
Both SANDAG and WRCOG have approved the concept of a grant application for such an
effort. SANDAG has agreed to be the lead agency for the grant application, and a copy of
their agenda report is attached. This report provides further information on the grant
objectives. These agencies have requested that Temecula, as well as other agencies provide a
letter of support for this effort, and a draft letter of support is attached. As a supporting
agency, Temecula would be expected to participate in the policy and technical discussions,
but would not be required to contribute matching funds. A copy of the draft grant application
R:IOGRADYJITRANSIT PLANNINGISANDAG GRANTAPPLICATION, CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 3-6-01.D0C 1 2/27/0~
is available for review in the offices of the City Clerk.
FISCAL IMPACT: Staff and possibly City Council time will be required to participate in various
working committees throughout the course of this project. The extent of this involvement is
not expected to be fiscally significant.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. SANDAG staff report dated February 23,2001
2. Draft letter of support
R:IOGRADYJITRANSlT PLANNINGiSANDAG GRANT APPLICATION, CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 3-$-01,DOC 2 2/27/01
San Diego Association of Governments
February 23, 2001
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AGENDA REPORT No.:01-2-
5
Action Requesed: APPROVE
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO
SUBMIT A STATE INTERREGIONAL PARTNERSHIP
GRANT APPLICATION
Introduction
The San Diego Association of Governments Board of Directors has expressed strong support for
strengthening interregional coordination in both planning and information sharing. At its
October 13, 2000 meeting, the SANDAG Executive Committee directed staff to work with the
appropriate agencies in the Western Riverside and San Diego regions to establish a partnership
between agencies from both regions to address common issues, such as jobs/housing balance,
traffic congestion, and energy transmission.
To help fund this partnership, SANDAG, along with the Western Riverside Council of
Governments 0NRCOG), the Southern CaEfomia Association of Governments (SCAG), and
other agencies from both regions, are jointly applying for a State Interregional Partnership (IRP)
grant. This grant is a one-time allocation for an amount up to $515,000, to be shared among the
partners over a three-year period based upon each agency's responsibilities. This grant program
seeks to fund work by two or more Councils of Governments desiring to implement a
collaborative approach to addressing the jobs/housing imbalance that exists between the
regions and the resulting traffic congestion impacts.
The State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) requires that each
application identify a lead agency for the grant. The lead agency must provide a resolution
from its governing body authorizing the entity to act as lead agency for the IRP grant and to
enter into a three-year contract with HCD for the IRP grant.
It is my
RECOMMENDATION
that the Board of Directors approve Resolution 2001- authorizing SANDAG to serve as the
lead agency for the Interregional Partnership grant and for the Executive Director to enter into a
contract with HCD for purposes of this grant.
Discussion
As directed by the SANDAG Executive Committee, SANDAG staff have been working with
WRCOG, SCAG, Caltrans, North County Transit District (NCTD), Metropolitan Transit
Development Board (MTDB), and local jurisdictions from both regions to develop a program for
addressing common growth-related issues. The initial focus of this work effort is the growing
jobs/housing imbalance that exists between the two regions. InterregionaJ Partnership grant
funds will be used to achieve the following objectives:
Enhance the current collaboration between the partners through the creation of a policy
advisory committee to guide the project, a technical working group, and the development
of a system for improved communication and coordination between the partners.
Develop a strong, integrated information base from which sound mitigation strategies and
policy recommendations can be drawn by combining existing and new data from both
regions and developing an integrated geographic information system.
Develop and implement short-term land use and transportation strategies that can be
implemented within a short period, make use of existing resources, and includes a
measurable impact.
Develop long-term strategies and policy recommendations that will reduce the demand
for interregional commuting and mitigate congestion impacts by improving the jobs/
housing balance and increasing the capacity of the 1-15 corridor that connects the regions.
BOB PARROTT
Interim Executive Director
Key Staff Contact: Jeff Martin, (619) 595-5358; jma@sandag.org
2
Jeff Comerchero
Mayor
Ronald H. Roberts
Mayor Pro-Tern
Michael S. Naggar
Councilmernber
Albert S. Pratt
Councilmember
Jeffrey E. Stone
Councilmember
(909) 506-6100
FAX 694-6499
DRAFT
March 7, 2001
Department of Housing and Community Development
State of Califomia
Division of Housing Policy Development
P.O. Box 952053
Sacramento CA 94252-2053
Dear Sir or Madam:
This letter is wdtten in support of the San Diego Association of Governments'
(SANDAG) application for an Interregional Partnership Grant in cooperation with
the Western Riverside Council of Governments 0NRCOG). This grant application
is intended to develop a program that will establish and promote cooperative
interregional planning among agencies from both regions to address jobs-housing
balance, transportation and other common issues.
Southwest Riverside County is one of the fastest growing areas in California and
is experiencing growth pressures from San Diego, as well as other regions. We
support SANDAG's efforts to work more closely with WRCOG and SCAG on
these and other growth-ralated issues through an interregional partnership grant.
This grant will help the two regions address and mitigate the current jobs-housing
imbalance as well as the worsening traffic congestion along I-15, which is the only
transportation corridor connecting the two regions.
Sincerely,
Jeff Comercherc
Mayor
ITEM 5
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITYA'FrORNEY
DIRECTOR OFFINANC/~
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager
March 6, 2001
Award of Contract to Update the City General Plan
Prepared by:
David Hogan, Senior Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
Award the contract to Cotton Bridges Associates in the amount of
$340,285 to assist the City in up'dating the General Plan.
BACKGROUND:
The City initially issued Requests-for-Qualifications/Proposal (RFQ/P) in July, 2000 to assist the
City in updating the General Plan. However, because only two firms submitted proposals, a second
RFQ/P was sent out in October, 2000. Four firms were interviewed by the members of the Genera~
Plan Subcommittee, as well as representatives of the City's Planning and Public Works
Departments. The Committee was in agreement that Cotton Bridges & Associates (CBA) had the
experience and depth of staff to provide the necessary services to the City. The proposed project
team will include the following firms:
· Cotton Bridges Associates (planning)
· Carter-Burgess (urban design)
· Austin Foust Associates (circulation)
· Stanley R. Hoffman & Associates (fiscal impact)
· Merkel &Associates (biologic resources)
· Weiland & Associates (noise)
Staff worked with CBA's Project Manager, John Bridges to initially revise the scope-of-work for the
contract. The General Plan Subcommittee was also involved in the review of the timing and scope
for the various components of this project. In addition, the General Plan Subcommittee reviewed
the proposed scope of work at it's February 6, 2001 Subcommittee Meeting. Staff received no
additional feedback or concerns from the members of the General Plan Subcommittee following
this meeting.
R:\GENPLAN\Comp Plan UI~ate\CBA Contract CC.do~
Based upon the scope of work, staff envisions the process will consist of the following general
activities:
The Identification of Issues (includes a community workshop and a joint PC/CC
study session)
Consideration of Revised Goals and Policies (includes a joint PC/CC Study
Session)
The Development of Alternative Plans (includes a community workshop and a joint
PC/CC study session)
Preparation of the Draft Updated General Plan (includes a community workshop
and a joint PC/CC study session)
Plan Hearing and Adoption process (includes both Planning Commission and City
Council hearings)
The project will include the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report to meet the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The amount of the contract is $340,285. There are sufficient funds in the Planning Department's
budget to complete the envisioned work (Account Number 001-161-999-5248).
Attachments:
Proposed Contract
Exhibit A. Scope of Work
Exhibit B. Budget
Exhibit C. Project Schedule
R:\GENPLAN\Conxp Plan Update\CBA Contract CC.dac
ATFACHMENT NO. 1
PROPOSED CONTRACT WITH COTTON BRIDGES & ASSOCIATES
R:~GENPLAN\Com@ Plan Upda~e\CBA Con[ract CC.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMENT
FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of March 6, 2001, between the City of
Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and Cotton/Bridges/Associates, ("Consultant"). In
consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on March 26, 2001, and shall
remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than
July 31,2002, unless sooner terminated or extended pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and
set fodh in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full.
Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set
forth in Exhibit A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to
the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant
shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons
engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its
obligations under this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment
rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and
Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full,
based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B other than the payment
rates and schedule of payment are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Three Hundred
Forty Thousand and Two Hundred and Eighty Five Dollars ($340,285) for the total term of the
Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection
with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such
additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall
be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City
Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the
performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten
percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum exceed twenty -five
thousand dollars ($25,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by
the City Council.
c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each
invoice as to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written
notice to Consultant within 15 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the
invoice.
5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10)
days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all
work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or
terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or
invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City
shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination,
provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement
pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4.
6. MODIFICATIONS.
This agreement may be modified or amended with the mutual approval of both
parties. The City's Project Manager is hereby authorized to make any and all minor changes
needed to ensure the appropriated completion of the work detailed in Exhibit A of this agreement.
7. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work
performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice
to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work
hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of
the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in
default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the
Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service
upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the
event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the
right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without
further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity
or under this Agreement.
8. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to
sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the
performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of
services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be
maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identi-
fied and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or
its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine
and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary,
and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this
Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a pedod of
three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing
data generated for the Work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of
providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property
of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of
the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant
shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary
computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and pdnting
Computer files.
9. INDEMNIFICATION.
a. Consultant shall Indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City, its Council,
servants, boards and commissions, officers, agents and employees from and against any and all
claims and losses, costs or expenses for any damages due to death or injury to any person and
injury to any property proximately resulting from any act or omission of the Consultant or any of its
officers, employees, servants, agents, or subcontractors in the performance of this Agreement.
Such cost and expense shall include reasonable attorney fees.
b. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its Council, servants,
boards, and commissions, officers agents and employees from and against any and all claims and
losses, costs or expenses which arise out of Consultant's negligent performance of the work under
this Agreement provided that such liability, loss, cost or expense is caused by the act or omission
of Consultant, or any of its officers, employees, servants, agents, or subcontractors in performance
of this Agreement. Consultants obligation for such indemnity and hold harmless shall not include
any obligation to defend City, its Council, servants, boards and commissions, officers, agents or
employees against and claim brought by any person, but the Consultants obligation to indemnify
the City shall include reasonable attorney fees if Consultant is found to have been negligent in
performance of work under this agreement.
10. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for
the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form
No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88.
(2)
Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01
06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the
Consultant owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to
the General Liability policy described above is acceptable.
(3)
Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has
no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's
compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall
execute a declaration that it has no employees.
(4) Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form
providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession.
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General
Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is
used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this
project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the
required occurrence limit.
(2)
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(3)
Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California;
Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for
bodily injury or disease.
(4)
Professional Liability coverage: Five hundred thousand dollars
($500,000) per claim and in aggregate.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City
Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as
respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a
bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense
expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and
completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied
or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or
borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special
limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers,
officials, employees or volunteers.
For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured
maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers
shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not
contribute with it.
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided
to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to
the limits of the insurer's liability.
(5)
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by
either party, except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice has
been given to the City.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self
insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements.
f. Verification of Coveraqe. Consultant shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a
person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on
forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before
work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide
complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the
coverage required by these specifications.
11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent
contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant
shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its
officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any
of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant
shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents
are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the
power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the
Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing
services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to
Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
12. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all
local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those
employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The
Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations.
The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure
of the Consultant to comply with this section.
13. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall
be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written
authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without
written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily
provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or
other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or
property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered
"voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of
deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery
request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed
thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right,
but.has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or
similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the
opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's
right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or
rewrite said response.
14. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other
party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii)
delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that
provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail,
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as
set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be
effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following
deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above.
To City:
City of Temecula
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: David Hogan, Senior Planner
To Consultant:
Cotton/Bridges Associates
6336 Greenwich Drive, Suite F.
San Diego, California 92122-5922
Attention: John Bridges, AICP
15. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of
the City. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this
Agreement, only John E. Bridges shall perform the services described in this Agreement. John E.
Bridges may use assistants, under his direct supervision, to perform some of the services under
this Agreement. Consultant shall provide City fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of
John E. Bridges from Consultant's employ. Should he or she leave Consultant's employ, the City
shall have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement, within seven (7) days of the close of
said notice period. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be
payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be
otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant. Should any City
employee assigned as the project manager or liaison person with the consultant for this project be
reassigned or leave the employment of the City, The Consultant shall immediately be notified and
shall have the opportunity to adjust the fees paid to the Consultant for any additional costs incurred
as a result of this change.
16. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall
have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services
described in this Agreement.
17. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the
laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties
to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning
this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic
jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the
other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's
judgement, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief
granted.
18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior
or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written,
are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering
into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's
own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
19. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the
authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind
Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
COTTON/BRIDGES/ASSOCIATES
By:
Name:
Title:
By:
Name:
Title:
(Signatures of two corporate officers required for Corporations)
EXHIBIT A
PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK
R:\GENPLAN\Comp Plan UpdatekCBA Contracl CC.doc
SCOPE OF SF_R. VICES AND SCHF
Temecula General
Plan Program
Scope of Services
The approach and methodology recommended for the Temecula General Plan
update program builds upon prior City planning efforts and responds to the
community's interest in land use and planning issues, Below, we summarize
our thoughts on engaging the community to confirm and update goals to be
accomplished. This discussion is followed by a detailed scope of services.
More specifically, this chapter is divided into the following five sections:
· Overview of the Approach
· Community Participation
· Geographic Information System (GIS) Data and Mapping
· Community Design
· Detailed Scope of Work
OVERVIEW OF THE APPROACH
As described in the Understanding and Approach section of this proposal, this
General Plan update program will combine the creative proposals contained in
existing City planning documents with new ideas emerging in the community
regarding long-range goals for Temecula. Our approach to the update will
involve the following components:
Program Refinement/Background Analysis. Meet with City staff to refine the
work program. Conduct background analysis and prepare technical working
papers to provide the foundation for policy formulation.
Issues Identification. Work to define the community issues and confirm the
vision for the future through a comprehensive community participation process.
Goals and Policies Development. Develop draft goals and policies to be
included within each of the General Plan elements.
Land Use/Circulation/Housing Alternatives. Utilize an integrated approach co
ensure that land use and drculation planning are directly connected through
computer modeling techniques that offer greater certainty in selection of a
preferred land use and circulation plan. Review a series of land
use/circulation/housing alternatives for key focus areas in the City and its sphere
of influence where maior parcels of vacant land exist. Choose the preferred
alternative for inclusion in the Draft General Plan,
Draft General Plan and Implementation Program. Prepare a preliminary draft
of the General Plan and land use polio/map for review with the Planning
Commission/City Council, and prepare a Draft General Plan for public review.
Prepare any necessary revisions to the 2000-2005 Housing Element.
City of Temecula
Ceneral Plan Update Program
1
Cotto n/Brid§es/Associat~s
January 26, 2001
Program EIR. Prepare a supplemental program EIR for the General Plan update
addressing the environmental impacts associated with implementation of the
Plan in Temecula and its spEere of influence,
Public Hearings and General Plan Adoption, Attend public hearings on Draft
Ceneral Plan and identify revisions based on City Council direction for Plan
adoption,
Final General Plan, Produce Final Plan documents and document/Cl$ files,
Close Coordination with City Staff and Decision Makers. Work closely and
collaboratively with City staff (as the technical advisory commie:ce) throughout
the program. Inform decision makers of progress and seek direction at
appropriate milestones.
State-of-the-Art GIS Information and Mappin~ Provide GIS data and mapping
in Arc/Info and ArcView for accuracy and clarity of information.
Community Design Principles. Tailor principles of New Urbanism and
sustainability Lo Temecula to improve community design, landscaping and
architecture.
StrongConsultant Leadershipand ProjectManagement. Direct consultingteam
and work closely with City staff and decision makers to produce an excellent
long-range plan for Temecula.
Throughout the program, we will involve City staff, City decision makers, and
the public, as described below.
Each updated element will follow State guidelines with regard ~o content. A
graphic summary depicting major tasks, products, meetings, and schedule of
our proposed program is provided in the diagram at the end of this section of
our proposal. We propose to structure the Plan as described in (:he City's RFP
to include the following elements or chapters, although we are amenable to any
alternative structure the City wishes to discuss:
· General Plan Overview
· Land Use
· Circulation
· Housing
· Open Space/Conservation
· Growth k4anagement/Pub[ic Facilities
· Public Safety
, Noise
· Air Quality
· Community Design
· Economic Development
Coeon/8 rid§es/Assodates
January 26, 2001
City of Temecula
General Plan Update Program 2
The Plan elements will be formatted in Microsoft Word, prepared in a three-
ring binder format, and supported by Arc/Info and ArcView GIS mapping and
graphics to ensure accuracy and clarity of information.
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
Participation Goals
The
public outreach and participation efforts will:
Establish community goals for the future of the Temecula;
Inform community stakeholders and the public-at-la~ge of the
comprehensive General Plan update program and opportunities to
participate in the program;
Engage the public in updating goals for the future, and commenting on
alternatives available within key focus or study areas; and
Include the community's ideas and comments to the fullest degree
possible and appropriate in the development of the updated General Plan.
The public participation and outreach program we have developed for the
General Plan update has been designed to engage all members of the
community -- residents, business owners, and persons and groups with large
property interests -- and to gain meaningful input from all. Our program
includes the following:
Development and use of a comprehensive community database or mailing
list as a primary method of notifying and informing the public about the
General Plan process and events.
· Use citywide newsletter, General Plan summary, the City website, among
other resources, to inform communitystakeholders and the public-at-large
of the fact that the City is undertaking a comprehensive General Plan
update.
· Conduct community work.chops to generate public discussion and ideas
regarding land use policy options for the key focus areas.
· Include the community's ideas and comments to the fullest degree
possible, and as appropriate, in the General Plan update.
Community
Database
An initial step in the public outreach a~vities is development ora
comprehensive community database or mailing list using Microsoft Access to
identify all community contacts and organizations targeted fgr the program.
Any existing contact lists from the City will serve as a starting point and will
be supplemented with original research for community stakeholders, groups,
professional associations and others. This database will serves as one of the
pr mary methods to notify the public about the General Plan program.
Notices can also be distributed through existing channels~ such as ocal
schools, the Chamber of Commerce, local newspapers and publications,
ethnic media and other proven methods of communication.
Use of Web Page
The CBA team will provide information about the General Plan program on
an ongoing basis as material that will be incorporated into the City's existing:
Internet web site. We will work in conjunction with City staff to develop
ongoing public materials and information including'.
City of Tem¢cula Cotten/Bridges/Assodates
General Plan Update Program 3 January 26, 2001
General Plan
Citywide Newsletter
and Summary
PC/CC Joint
Study Sessions
Community
Workshops
Status of the General Plan update program
· Upcoming workshop schedule
· .Methods for public comment
· Summary of proposed updated General Plan
· Other relevant topics
Early in the program, a newsletter will be prepared to inform residents and the
business community about the General Plan pro.am and opportunities for
participation and public commenL
Once the Draft General Plan has been completed, we will prepare a
newsletter-style summary ofthe Draft General Plan. The summary will provide
a description of the update process and results~ as well as contact names and
phone numbers for additional information, The summary will be designed to
provide interested readers with a brief description of'the General Plan and
contents in an easy-to-read newsletter style with ~-~phics and call-out boxes of
import~nt information.
CBA recommends that four joint study sessions with the Planning Commission
and City Council be conducted at decision points in the program. We propose
to meet to (1) introduce the overall program and review the vlsion for the future
and general policy direction, (2) confirm the issues, and review goals and
policies, (3) review land use/circulation/housing alternatives and confirm the
preferred land use/circulation altemative to be included in the Draft Land Use
and Circulation Elements, and (3) review the preliminary Dram Plan prior to
public hearings.
Our work program includes three interactive community workshops for the
General Plan program, The first workshop will be held during the issue
identification and visioning phase of the program. At this workshop~ we will
focus on defining community ideas about issues to be addressed in the General
Plan and the vision for the future of Temecula. The second workshop will be
conducted to present draft land use/circulation alternatives and receive public
input on these options. The third workshop will be conducted once a
preliminary Draft General Plan is available for public review to assess reaction
to the total plan before the final joint workshop with Planning Commission and
City Council, and before public hearinss begin.
CBA Principal/Project Manager John Bridges will fadlitate the workshops, with
other CBA support staff. Our team will maintain responsibility for workshop
logistical support~ agenda, handout materials, and meeting notes. We will rely
on City staff for noticing of the workshops.
Co~o n/B ridges/Associates
January 26, 2001
City of' Temecula
General Plan Update Program 4
Utilization of City
Information and
Collaboration with
Staff
GIS DATA AND MAPPING
CBA recognizes that the City already has a substantial amount of electronic and
non-electronic data that will be valuable in preparing the General Plan
database, We will utilize all available data from the City's Arc/Info system
including parcel lines, General Plan land use designations, zoning, various
boundaries, landmarks~ meets, and district boundaries, as well as any current
digital ortho photos.
CBA will work in a collaborative manner with City staff to develop GIS
information for use in preparing the General Plan and its associated program
EIR. In particular, we will discuss the types of information available from the
County of Riverside CIS system (floodplain, vegetation, etc.) and how that
information will be portrayed in General Plan and EIR mapping.
We will also work directly with Austin-Foust A~sociates to integrate existing and
proposed land use and circulation information through computer modeling
techniques that provide state-of-the-art results for important decision making.
Ardlnfo and
ArcView
Data Precision
CBA has extensive experience using GIS for General Plan programs and
environmental analysis. Since 1986, CBA has used computer mapping to
calculate areas of existing and proposed land uses and to estimate future
development for general plans, redevelopment plans and EIRs. Arc/Info and
ArcView have been used on many assignments to develop demographic,
housing, economic and environmental information used in developing plans
or preparing EIRs.
General Plan exhibits will be developed using Arc/Info 8 and ArcView 3.2, then
imported to the Adobe Illustrator graphics program to produce General Plan
hard.copyexhibitsofexcellentqualityand accuracy. GIS data created byCBA
will be in the same projection and coordinate system as the City's existing data
and will be provided to the City as An:View shapefiles. Both the Plan and its
associated maps will be prepared in a format suitable for use on des..ktop
computers within the City office network (intranet) and website (interneo.
CBA understands the importance of ensuringthat information developed during
the General Plan program matches the accuracy of information, both positional
and attribute-related, currently within the City GIS system. We will ensure the
accuracy of the data produced before the information is provided to the City,
and will register all new or modified information to the City parcel base map
to maintain system integrity. CBA will work closely with Temecula's GIS
to ensure consistency of data quality and map products with existing City
standards.
City of Ternecula Cotton/Bridges/Associat=s
General Plan Update Program -~ Januap/26, 2001
COMMUNITY DESIGN
CBA understands the importance of improving the overall quality of
development in Temeeula. By applying the principles of New Urbanism and
sustainability to the Community Design Element update, the City can begin to
improve the aesthetic quality of both existing and proposed development.
DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK
To complete the Temecula General Plan program, we will complete the tasks,
produce the work products~ and at~end the meetings identified in the following
scope of work. A graphic summary of our program is provided in the diagram
at the end of this section of our proposal.
Task 1.
Conduct
Bacl,'ground
Analysis
The purpose of this t~sk is to provide the project team with a solid foundation
and understanding of the issues important to the General Plan program. We
begin the program with a staff meeting to establish a definitive project schedule
with product delivery dates. Collection of important background information
and preparation of technical repor~working papers is also necessary Lo provide
a sound basis for the update.
1.1
Prepare Program
Notebooks
CRA will prepare program not~books for distribution to key City staff, Planning
Commissioners and CityCouncil members. The notebooks consist of three-ring
binders suitable for organizing and maintainingwritten information provided
by the team during the course of the program.
1.2
Conduct Initiation
Tour with eib/Staff
1.3
Collect and Review
Background Data
Key members of the consultant team and City staff Will take a bus/van tour to
visit potential focus areas and other locations that need to be addressed in the
update.
This subtask involves a coordinated data collection effort :o provide the
background information necessaffto complete both the General Plan update
and the supplemental program EIR, and to prepare the base map (subtask 1.8)
and subsequent GIS products. The consultant team will review recently
completed plans and studies relevant to the General Plan issues and will
conduct independent studies and research as required to gain a full
understanding of existing conditions. In addition to the existing land use survey
described in subtask 1,4, our team will undertake the following background
research:
* , Ceology/Seismicity
· Biological Resources (technical report by Merkel & Associates)
Cultural Resources
Transportation/Circulation (technical report by ^ustin-Foust Associates)
Noise (technical report by Wieland Associates
* Infrastructure
Air and Water quality
· Agricultural Resources
· Public Services
Cotton/B ridges/Associates
January 26, 2001
City of Temec~la
General Plan Update Program 6
1.4
Land Use Survey
1.5
Interview City Staff
1.6
Background
Working
Papers
1.7
Develop CIS
Information and
Base Map
1,8
Community
Database
1,9
Website
· Recreation
· Energy Use
CBA will conduct a land use survey to identify existing land use and
environmental and planning conditions. Resources to be used include existing
G S mapping, aerial photography, building permit records, and field surveys to
spot check areas. This information will be mapped onto the GIS database.
Team members will interview City staff and staff of other relevant agencies (the
Technical Advisory Committee) to gain greater understanding of issues and
concerns, and hear their ideas.
A complete set of background working papers will be prepared to document
existing condit OhS needed to develop the General Plan elements, We propose
to prepare the working papers in a format that provides environmental setting
descriptions for the EIR as well. These documents will be of long-term utility,
as the City ma), update them in subsequent years to reflect changing conditions
over time,
CBA will use Are/Info and ArcView to create suitable data and maps for the
General Plan, particularly the land use policy map and others describing
environmental conditions, such as t'auk zones, flood zones, vegetation, otc. We
recognize that the City currently has accurate GIS parcelized base map
information available through the County of Riverside,
An initial step in the public outreach activities is development of a
comprehensive community database or mailing list using Microsoft Access to
identify all community contact~ and organizations targeted for the program.
Any existing contact lists from the CiL7 will serve as a starting point and will be
supplemented with original research for community stakeholders, groups~
professional associations and others. This database will serves as one of the
primary methods to be used by City staff in notifying the public about the
General Plan program. Notices can also be distributed by City staff through
existing channels, such as local schools, the Chamber of Commerce, local
newspapers and publications, ethnic media and other proven methods of
communication.
The CBA team will provide information about the General Plan program on an
ongoing basis as material that will be incorporated into the City's Internet web
site. We will work in conjunction with City staff to develop ongoing public
materials and information including:
· Status of the General Plan update program
· Descriptions of proposed focus area alternatives
· Upcoming workshop schedule
· Methods for public comment
· Summary of proposed updated General Plan
· Other relevant topics
Cotton/Bridges/Associates
January 26, 2001
City of Temecula
General Plan Update Program 7
Products
Meetings
· Program Notebooks (20 notebooks)
· Background Worldng Papers (20 copies)
GIS Base Map (1 copy)
· ~xisting Land Use Map and Statistics (1 copy)
· Community Database (1 copy)
Website material
· Monthly Progress Repor:s (1 per month)
· Project Team Kick-Off Meeting (1)
TAC Interviews (1)
· Bus/Van Tour with City Staff (1)
· Monthly Progress Meetings (1 per month)
TASK 2.
Issues Identification
2,1
First Community
WorEshop
The purpose of this task is to identify ideas and goals contained in current
planning documents still important and relevant to Temecula, to define new or
modified goals to be achieved through implementation of the General Plan.
The first of 3 community workshops will be conducted to identify important
issues to be addressed in the General Plan update pro~ram. CBA will also use
this opportunity to confirm the vision for the future described in the existing
General Plan.
2.2
Summaq~
Memorandum -
Important Issues
2.3
PC/CC Study
Session
Based on research conducted duringTask 1 and comments received during the
first Communi~/Workshop, we will prepare a draft memorandum outlining our
impressions regarding previously stated issues and objectives of continuing
importance to Temecula. This memo will be provided to City staff for
distribution and reviewwith the Planning Commission, City Council, Technical
Advisory Committee and the public.
The first of 4 joint study sessions with the Planning Commission and City
Council to will be conducted to review the overall program and assess decision
maker intarest, vision for the future, and general policy direction for issues to
be addressed in the updated General Plan.
2.4
Final Summary
Memorandum
Following the PC/CC Study Session, CBA will finalize the Summary
Memorandum of important issues based on comments re~ived from decision
makers.
2.5
General Plan
Newsletter
We will prepare a newsletter for citywide distribution by City staff describing
the General Plan update program, program schedule, and opportunities for
public input and other program information. The newsletter can be disttibuted
with existing City publications and will be appropriate for posting on the City's
website.
Products
· First Community Workshop materials
· Draft Summary Memorandum (reproducible copy)
· Final Summary Memorandum (reprodudble copy)
· General Plan Newsletter (reproducible and electronic copies)
Monthly Progress Reports (1 per month)
City of Temecula Cotton/Bridges/Associates
General Plan Update Program 8 January 26, 2001
Meetings
Community Workshop #1 (1)
PC/CC Joint Study Session ~sl (1
Monthly Progress Meetings (1 per month)
TASK 3,
Develop
Goals and Policies
3.1
Draft Preliminary
Issues, Goals and
Policies
3.2
Prepare Goals,
Policies, and
Objectives Working
Paper
3.3
PC/CC Study Session
Products
Meetin~
Goals and policies of the General Plan provide direction for future growth and
development in the community, while implementation programs offer specific
methods to achieve those goals and polices. The purpose of this task is to build
upon the issues, opportunities, and vision identified in Task 2 by refining the
existing set of goals and policies as the basis for preparing the updated General
Plan.
We will describe the issues to be addressed in the Plan elements and prepare
a preliminary draft Issues, Coals and Policies working paper for review with City
staff,
We will revise the working paper to incorporate staff's comments and produce
a final working paper to assist the GPAC in articulating goals, objectives and
policies for the updated General Plan.
A second joint study session with the Planning Commission and City Council
is planned to confirm the issues to be addressed, and review preliminary goals
and policies.
* Preliminary draft Issues, Goals and Policies Working Paper (10 copies)
* Issues, Goals, and Policies Working Paper for Review with GPAC (20
copies)
* Monthly ProFess Repo~ (1 per month)
· PC/CC Joint Study Session #2 (1)
· Monthly Progress Meetings (1 per month)
TASK 4.
Land Use/
Circulation/
Housing
Alternatives
The future form and character of Temecula is reflected in the Land Use
Element. Land use planning must also be closely coordinated with the
anticipated job and population growth for the City. The purpose of this task is
to develop concept alternatives for land use and circulation based on economic
development, environmental, public facilities, housing needs, and other factors.
Alternative land use proposals for focus areas where future change is
anticipated will be evaluated and then reviewed for circulation system
implications. This tesk leads to selection ora preferred land use/circulation plan
as the basis for preparing ~e Land Use, Circulation, Housing and other
elements of the Draft General Plan.
City of Temecula Cot~on/Bridses/Assodates
General Plan Update Program 9 Januaq~ 26, 2001
4.1
Develop
Alternatives
Concepts
4,2
Prepare Land Use,
Circulation, and
Housing
Alternatives
4.3
Community
Workshop
4,4
PC/CC Study
Session
CBA will develop Land Use/Circulation/Housing Alternatives concepts in
conjunction with City staff. We will work with City staff to identify target areas
where changes in land use and/or adjustments to allowable uses or
development intensity will be studied during this stage. These areas will
nc ude those focus areas identified for intensification or change in existing or
planned use, Up to three land use scenarios (including the 1993 Genera Plan)
will be developed for areas of probable change, and color presentation maps
will be prepared. The current land use designation system will be updated to
reflect Citydesired changes tothe Land Use Element. Non-residentialintensity
standards and residential density standards will be identified and confirmed.
Major street standards will be reviewed and capacities established. These will
serve as a basis for computer modeling of the alternatives,
The recommendations will include the reclassification of land use for parcels in
the City and its $OI and planning area. Using the fiscal impact factors derived
for each proposed land use category, Stanley R. Hoffman Associates will
estimate both the current net fiscal impact being generated by the designated
properties and the prospective net fiscal impact. This analysis will be
performed for each of the three alternatives. The net fiscal impacts will be
estimated for the properties as if fully built-out in the designated new uses. This
will provide the basis by which the Planning Commission, and City Council will
be able to include fiscal considerations as one factor in selecting from among
alternative land use plans.
Land Use, Circulation and HousingAIternatives will be prepared for distribution
to and review/comment bythe Planning Commission and City Council in a joint
workshop. The alternatives will include both narrative and graphic descriptions.
CBA will allocate residential densities and will extrapolate non-residential, non-
retail land area requirements based on expected employment intensity and
land area requirements.
The second of 3 community workshops will be conducted to review the land
use, housing and circulation alternatives, Input from this workshop will be
shared with the Planning Commission and City Council.
A third joint workshop with the Planning Commission and City Council will
occur to review preferences on alternatives and reach consensus in selection
of a preferred land use/circulation alternative, The preferred alternative will
provide the basis for the consultant team's preparation of the Land Use,
Circulation and Housing Elements of the Draft General Plan. CBA will produce
narrative and graphic description of the preferred plan.
cot~on/8 ridges/Associates
January 26, 2001
City of Temecula
General Plan Update Pm§ram 10
Products
Meetin~
TA~K 5.
Prepare Ore~
General Plan and
Implementation
Pro,ram
5.1
Prepare Prelimina~/
Draft General Plan
· Land Use/Circulation Alternatives Maps (3 alternatives)
Alternatives Memorandum (25 copies)
· Fiscal Analysis of Alternatives/Preferred Plan (30)
· Monthly Progress Reports (1 per month)
· Community Workshop #2 (1)
· PC/CC Joint Study Session #3 (1)
· Monthly Progress Meetings (1 per month)
At th s stage, the CB^ team has comp ed adequate background information
and received appropriate po icy direction during study sessions on issues,
policies and the preferred land use/circulation plan. With this information, CgA
will complete a Draft General Plan for public review and subsequent public
hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council. A preliminary
version of the Plan will be reviewed with the Planning Commission/City Council
to ensure understanding of Plan content before public hearings begin. This
Draft General Plan will be the project analyzed in the Draft EIR described in
Task 7.
We will prepare preliminary draft General Plan elements for review by City
staff. All elements will fellow a common format including an introduction,
goals and policies, plans/proposals and implementation/action measures. This
common format makes the document easier to use and under~l~nd. Each
element will be prepared following California Government Code Section
65302, et seq., State General Plan Guidelines and the City's RFP as generally
described below, butwill specifically be tailored to issues identified through the
community participation portion of the General Plan program. Each existing
element will also be thoroughly reviewed with City staff to determine specific
areas of refinement or change needed to conform with current policy direction
before preparing the preliminary draft Plan.
Oven/iow: The Overview will describe ~e p.urp_o, se O~:nh~mCa~:~ilo:~n~
community context, the process used to upaate me ~ian, p
use, and the Vision for the future.
Land Use Element: Land use designations for residential, industrial,
commercial, open space and other types will be described and mapped, along
with spedfic measures of density or intensity of use. Key development focus
areas/alternatives will be identified and described.
The element will focus on: use of remaining vacant land, neighborhood
preservation and enhancement, and revitalization/redevelopment. The
following context will be used to address identified issues:
Co,on/Bridges/Associates
Janua~' 26, 2001
City of Temecula
General Plan Update Program 11
Economic forces are driving jobs and housing into Riverside County and
Temecula;
Lands that will develop in the ~uture lie within the City and Rs sphere of
influence, and Temecula wishes to employ methods of controllin~
directing and phasing future growth and development to mmnta'n overall
quality of life in the community, maintaining open space and agricultural
uses; and
· The Countyof Riverside is preparingap late§rated Plan for uninc°rp°r~ted
lands around Temeeula that includes an updated General Plan, a Multi-
Species Habitat ConservaUon Plan (MSHCP), and a Community and
Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP), all of which
may affect long-range planning for the City.
Circulation Element: The Circulation Element will address future traffic and
roadway use, demand, and revision to the circulation network necessary to
achieve City objectives in terms of level of service, neighborhood protection,
and overall street system operating ~nd Lions. Congestion management:
trans ortation system management~ transit (bus), bicycle trail circulation, and
truc~Pr°outes will be incorporated as part of the element. Technical support for
preparation of the element will be provid, ed by Austin-Foust Associates and the
technical study prepared by AFA will include a general 5, 10 and 20-year
phasing plan for roadway improvements.
Although related Lo circulation, public u~i ities and ~ac~lit es will be addressed
in the Growth Management/Public Facilities Element.
Housing Element: CBA has prepared the City's 2000-2005 Housing Element
and will revise the Element a~ necessary based on any update of the Land Use
Element that affects land designated for future residential development.
Following completion and City staff review of a screenchecl¢ Element, CBA will
prepare a pub c review draft Element for submiss on to State HCD Lo initiate
their 4S-day review. The Draft Element will also be made available in pub lc
locations for review and comment.
Based on the evaluation of the City's future RHNA, the Housing Element will
evaluate whether the City will be able to meet its futore housing growth needs.
To the extent there is a shortfall in the City's ability to meet its RHNA based on'
available resources, CBA will define more realistic quantified objectives for the
City as permitted under State law. The element will identify housing needs,
assisted units at-risk of converting to market rate, constraints on housing
production, housing resources, evaluation of accomplishments under the
existing housin8 element, and housing pro,'ams.
Ci~ of Temecula
General Plan update Program
Cotton/Bridges/Associates
january 26, 2001
Upon receipt of comments from HCD on the Draft Housing Element, CBA will,
in consultation with staff, draft a memorandum identi~ing any recommended
changes to the Element necessary to achieve HCD compliance. CBA will assist
City staff in conducting the City Council and Planning Commission public
hearings on the Draft Element. All comments and changes arising from these
meetings will be incorporated into the final document.
Open Space/Conservation Element: Various natural and man-made resources
will be identified and addressed including cultural and historic resources,
sensitive biological habitat and species (in relatJon to the County/vtSHCP
program), hillside preservation areas and scenic resources, ag?icultural
resources, water quality, ener~/, and mineral resources/reclamation.
Open space topics to be addressed include areas:
· Identified for preservation of natural and man-made resources (important
biological habitat, historic and archaeological sites/struCtures).
· Used for managed production of resources (agriculture, mineral resources,
ground water basins, and waterways).
· Used for outdoor recreation (parklands, trails, recreation areas).
· mportant for public health and safety (earthquake fault zones, unstable
soils, floodplains, watersheds, h gh fire risk areas~ etc,)
Growth Management/Public Facilities: The Growth /vtanagement/Public
Fac lities E ement will address phasing of publi, c facilities and services to manage
growth in Temecula, Specific topics nclude, water and wastewater systems;
solid and hazardous waste management; schools; libraries; fire and police; gas
and electric power; flood control; and municipal facilities. The content of this
element will need to be coordinated with plans of other districts/entities to
develop a complete assessment of facilities and services supporting future
growth and development.
Public Safety Element: Updated information and state-of-the-art policies
regard ng earthquake fault and related seismic h~zards will be.incl, ud.ed. ~e
Element will also address safety-re ated ssues of flood hazards, lire nazams,
hazardous materials, drainage and flooding~ transportation hazards, and
emergency preparedness.
Noise Element: Noise associated with transportation (ground and air) and other
sources will be identified, as well as sensitive noise receptors, such as residential
developmentt medical facilities, etc. General levels of noise and land use
compatibility will be included in matrix form. Projected noise based on future
conditions will be documented and mapped to identify areas that will be
subjected to significant noise in the futuret along with methods to reduce the
effects of noise.
City of Temecula
General Plan Update Program
Cottuon/Bridges/Associates
January 26, 2001
5.2 Community
Workshop
5.3
PC/CC Joint Study
Session
5.4
Prepare
Implementation
Program
Air Quality: This element will be updated to reflect strategies contained in the
1997 South Coast Air Quality Management Plan addressing:
Improvement of air quality thro. ugh proper land use planning
· Improving air quality through c~rculation enhancements
· Conserving energy to reduce a r emissions
· Coordinating regional planning efforts to improve air quality
Community Design: The physical quality of development in the community is
often judged by quality of its architecture and landscaping. CBA team member
Carter & Burgess will assist in updating this element by applying principles of
New Urbanism and sustainab ty to City policy for urban d. esi§n. Prep,arati. on
of the updated element will include development of alternative planning
concepts for areas of new development and redevelopment. Emphasis will be
placed on site design, streetscape, landscaping, architecture and buildingtypes.
l~conomic Development: CBA team member Stanley R. Hoffman Associates
(5RHA) will assist in updating this element with emphasis on Temecula's
position as part of a regional economy, opportunities' for economic expansion
and competitive advantage, and ensuring long-term economic and fiscal
stability. As described in Task 4, SRHA will also provide an assessment of the
fiscal impacts associated with land use alternatives considered by the City as a
way of incorporating such cons~derat OhS n dec'sion regard use of remaining
lands.
Following City review of the preliminary draft elements, CBA will meet with
staff to review their comments. A complete preliminary draft General Plan will
be prepared incorporating City staff's directed changes. The preliminary draft
Plan will contain all elements, as well as a glossary a. nd will address both the
City and its 5OI. The preliminary Draft Plan wdl include the elements
described above.
The third of 3 community workshops will be conducted once a preliminary
Draft General Plan is available for public review to assess reaction to the total
p an before the final joint workshop with Planning Commission and City
Council, and before public hearings beg n.
A fourth joint workshop with the Planning Commission and City Council will be
conducted to review the preliminary Draft General Plan and comments
received on the document during the third Community Workshop.
A detailed General Plan Implementation PrOlFam is important for prioritizing
City actions to be undertaken to mp ement General Plan goals and objectives,
and to identify funding sources to be used. If the City desires, we will prepare
such a program to be included as an appendix to but not adopted as part of tbe
Ceneral Plan. By adopting the Implementation Program separately, the City
Council can amend the Program annually to reflect changing priorities without
having to undertake a General Plan Amendment.
City of Temecula
General Plan update Program
14
Cotton/Bridges/Associates
Janum7 26, 2001
Products
Meetings
· Preliminary Draft General Plan #1 for Staff (5 copies)
· Preliminary Draft General Plan ~2 for Community Workshop and Joint
PC/CC Study Session (20 copies)
· Draft General Plan for Public Review (7.~ copies)
· Preliminary Draft Implementation Program (20 copies)
· Draft Implementation program (75 copies)
· Draft General Plan Summary (one reproducible)
· Monthly Progress Reports (1 per month)
· Community Workshop #3 (1)
· pC/CC Joint Study Session #4 (1)
· Monthly Progress Meetings (1 per month)
TASK 6.
Program EIR
6.1
Contact and
Consult Responsible
Agencies
6.2
Prepare
5creencheck Draft
EIR
6,3
Revise Draft EIR
lemental rogram environmental impact report ( Program EIR) must be
,', supp P ro am to rovide adequate
prepared as part of the General Plan update p gr p
environmental documentation. During the eady stages of the program,
environmental issues will be incorporated into the Plan itself to ensure that it
is environmentaliy sound. We will utilize information contained w~th'n the
1993 Genera[ Plan Final £1R as appropriate and update the environmental
analyses to reflect changes since 1993. Preparation of the EIR in concert with
the Plan will promote streamlining of subsequent environmental review for
future projects within the CiL7 that are consistent with the General Plan.
We will contact responsible agencies to identify concerns/responsibilities of
those agencies to be addressed in the Program £1R. This contact will actually
occur.earlier in the program as part of P an preparation, but responsible
a enems can respond more fu yto the Not ce of Preparation. CBA will prepare
~ee Initial Study and NOP and will also be responsible for preparing mailing all
CEQA notices.
We will prepare a complete screencheek Draft EIR for City staff review. The
Draft EIR will be prepared in accordance with CEQA and the Srate CEQ^
Cuidelines. The Draft EIR will be prepared following completion of an Initial
Study documenting all environmental issues identified as potentially significant
during the General Plan update process. The screencheck draft will be
submitted for review by City staff.
In part cu ar, the £1R will include analysis of circulation system impacts due Lo
land use policy revisions. CBAwi util ze thetechnical report for trafficthatwill
be incorporated into the Draft EIR and modified (if necessary) for inclusion in
the Final EIR document.
Following review and comment from City staff, CBA will review all staff
comments and make appropriate modifications to complete a Public Review
Dram EIR for release with the Public Review Draft General Plan.
City of Temecul~.
General Plan update Program
lS
Cotton/Brid§es/Assoda~es
January 26, 2001
6.4
Draft FIR for Public
Review
Prepare Final
6.6
Prepare Support
Documentation
Products
Meetings
The Draft EIR will be released for the required 4S-day pubhc rev'ew period.
CBA will be responsible for mailing the document Following completion of
the 45-day public review period for the Draft EIR, the Final EIRwill be prepared
by CBA for City Council certification.
We will prepare the Final FIR to include responses to comment~ on Draft EIR
and document revisions. Responses will be prepared to all written comments
received during the 45-day public, review period. Responses will be
incorporated into the Final EIR.
Along with the Final EIR, CBA will prepare CEQA findings, overriding
considerations, and a miti§afion monitoring program to allow City Council
certification of the F hal EIR. The mitigation monitoring progra.m for the EIR,
will be organized to facilitate annual monitoring in concert with the annual
report to the City Council on implementation of the General Plan.
· Screeneheek Draft EIR and technical appendi~es (10 copies)
· Public Review Draft EIR and technical appendices ($0 copies and one
reproducible master)
· Responses to comments on Draft EIR for City staff review (10 copies)
· Final EIR and technical appendices (50 copies and one reproducible
master)
· Administrative Findings, Overriding Considerations and Final Mitigation
Monitoring program for Cty staff review (10 copies)
· Final Findings, Overriding Considerations and Final Mitigat on Monitoring
Report (50 copies and one reproducible master)
· CEQA Notices
· Monthly progress Repo~s (1 per month)
1
· Month y Progress Meetings ( per month)
TASK 7.
Public
Hearings
and General Plan
Adoption
7.1
Plannin§
Commission
Hearings
7.2
City Council
Hearings
This purpose of this task is to allow for public review of the Draft General Plan
and £1R during public hearings,
CBA Principal John Bridges will be available to attend Planning Commission
hearinEs to present the Draft P an and respond to public and Commission
comments and questions, Other members of the project team will be available
:o attend on a reimbursable basis.
CBA Principal John Bridges will be available to attend City Council hearings to
present the Draft Plan and respond to public and City Council comments and
questions. Other members of the project team will be available to attend on
a reimbursable basis.
ProducLs
City of Temeeula
General Plan Update Program
Hearing Presentation Materials
Monthly Progress Reports (1 per month)
16
Cot~on/B ridges/Associates
January 26, 2001
Meetings
TASK 8.
Final General Plan
and Land Use Map
8.1
Preliminary Final
Plan and Map
Final Plan and Map
Products
· pianning Commission Hearings (2)
· City Council Hearings [2)
· Monthly pro~'ess Meetings (1 per month]
The purpose of this task is to prepare a final updamd General Plan,
Implementation Program, and Land Use Policy Map which incorporate City
Council-directed revisions to the draft documents.
We will reoare a pre minary Final General P an and Implementation Program
P., .... ,- ~.,- .... q at the end of nubl c hear nE;.
basedondrec:ionreceiveoTrom[ne~-~c)'~--uu'"'. ~ ., r ,. ina final
ollowin incorporation of changes directed bythe ~_ounclt, a prelim ry
~eneral I~lan will be reviewed by City staff, and any remaining corrections will
be made,
Fo Iowine ncorporation of all final corrections nto the Plan, Implementation
Program~and Land Use Po icy Map, we will present the document~ to the City
Council for adoption. The City Council will certify the F hal EIR and adopt the
updated Plan.
, Presentation scale exhibits of key features of General Plan for hearings (1
set}
, Preliminary Final General Plan for CRy staff review (1 copy)
· Final General Plan and Summary (disk and one reproducible master -
number of printed copies to be determined)
· Entire General Plan on computer disk
TASK 9.
Project
Management
CB^ wi I provide overa I management of the pro§ram and consulting team.
Direction of the program will be prov ded by CB^ Principal John Bridges, AICP
City of Temecula
General Plan Update Pro§ram
17
Cotto n/B~dges/Assodates
January 26, 2001
SUMMARY OF PRODUCTS AND MEETINGS
Produet~ Task 1
· program Notebooks (20 notebooks)
· nac~mund Worldn§ PaperS (20 copies)
· CIS Base Map (1 copy)
· Existing Land Use Map and Statistics (1 copy)
· Community Database (1 copy)
· Website material
· Monthly Progress Reports (1 per month)
Task 2
First Community Workshop materials
· Draft Summary Memorandum (reproducible copy)
· Final Summary Memorandum (reproducible copy)
· General Plan Newsletter (reproducible and electronic copies)
· Monthly Progress Reports (1 per month)
Task 3
· Prelim nary draft Issues, Goa s and Policies Working Paper (.lO_c_o.pi..es!.^
· Issues, Goals, and Policies Working Paper for Review wi~
copies)
· Monthly Progress Reports (1 per month)
Task4
· Land use/Circulation Alternatives Maps (3 alternativeS)
· Alternatives Memorandum (25 copies)
· Fiscal Analysis of Alternatives/Preferred Plan (30)
· Monthly progress Repo~s (1 per month)
Tasks
· Preliminary Draft General Plan #1 for Staff (5 copies)
· Preliminary Draft General Plan #2 for Community Workshop and Joint
PC/CC Study Session C20 copies)
· Draft General Plan for Public Review (75 copies)
· Preliminary Draft Implementation Program (20 copies)
· Draft Imp ementation Program (75 copies)
· Draft General Plan Summary (one reproduc hie)
· Monthly Progress Reports (1 per month)
City of Temecula
General Plan Update Program
18
CottoWB ~id§es/AssociateS
January 26, 2001
T~k 6
· Screencheck Draft EIR and technical appendices (10 copies)
· Public Review Draft EIR and technical appendices (50 copies and one
reproducible master)
· Responses to comments on Draft EIR for City staff review (10 copies)
· Final EIR and technica) appendices C50 copies and one reproducible
master)
· Administrative Findings, Overriding Considerations and Final Mitigation
Monitoring Program for C ty staff rev ew (10 copies)
· Final Findings~ Overriding Considerations and Finat Mitigation Monitoring
Repo~c (50 copies and one reproducible master)
· CEQA Notices
· Monthly Progress Repons (1 per month)
Task 7
· Hearing Presentation Materials
· Monthly Progress Repons (1 per month)
Task 8
· Presentation c. ale exhibits of key features of Ceneral Plan for hearin~ (1
set)
· prelimina0, Final Ceneral Plan for City st~ff review (1 copy)
· Final Genera~ Plan and 5umma~7 (disk and one reproducible master
number of printed copies to be determined)
· Entire Ceneral Plan on computer disk
Meetings
Ta~k I
· Project Team Kick-Off Meeting (1)
· TAC Interviews (1)
· BusNan Tour with City Staff (1)
· MonbSly ProsreSS Meetings (1 per month)
Task 2
· Community Workshop #1 (1)
· PC/CC Joint Study Session ~1 (1)
· Monthly Progress Meetinl~ (1 per month)
Task 3
· PC/CC Joint Study Session #2 (1)
· Monthly Progress Meetings (1 per month)
City of Temecula
General Plan Update Program
19
Cotton/Bridges/AssociateS
January 26, 2001
Temecu[a General
Plan Program
Schedule
· Community Workshop #2 (1)
· PC/CC Joint Study 5ess on #3 (1)
· Monthly Progress Meetings (1 per month)
Task 5
· Community Workshop #3 (1)
· ?C/CC Joint Study Session ~4 (1)
· Monthly Progress Meetings (1 per month)
Task 6
· Monthly Progress Meetings (1 per month)
Task 7
· Planning Commission Hearings (2)
· City Council Hearings (2)
· Monthly progress Meetings (1 per month)
The diagram on t~e following page illustrates that t~e proposed Temecula
General Plan program (including CEQ^ compliance/Program EIR completion)
can be completed within a 12- to 14-month time frame, This schedule is
,,. maintain a h §hevel of interest in the program, We have
~.e~s~,e,~v ct~nm, eted izenera plan updates for cities wi.thin ,u
t,,~v,~-~,; --..-r ~ ~-,-~ *,~.-. o~individuals w th extensive
and have purposely assemu~u ,' '~'~, ,' ·
in general plan programs and knowledge o~the Temecula community to ensure
adherence to this schedule.
Our team has suffident staff resources to allow for quick turn around and
response time on documents. We pride ourselves on being able to work with
clients on projects with demanding schedules, and we maintain an excellent
reputation for on-time deliver/of high quality products.
City of Temecula
General Plan Update Program
2O
Coi~O nib rid§es/Associates
January 26, 2001
Proposal - City of Temecula
GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT
PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES
The following is a scope of services proposed by Austin-Foust Associates, Inc. (AFA) to update the
City of Temecula Circulation Element. The work will be carded out as part of an overall update to the City's
General Plan.
OVERALL APPROACH
The work proposed here includes a comprehensive review and update of the ex/sting Circulation
Element. AFA has had considerable experience in General Plan updates and in addressing the special areas
of concern which are unique to cities such as Temecula. Some of the special features in AFA's approach
are as follows:
Updating the City's traffic model to provide intersection level forecasts
Establishing performance criteria that are responsive to the needs and desires of the
community
Identif3dng critical problem areas in the circulation system
Evaluating freeway access issues
Addressing regional growth issues
With respect to preparing traffic forecasts for the highway system, it is proposed that the City's
traffic forecasting model be mf'med to provide peak hour intersection forecasting capability. This modeling
capability will assist in assessing long-range capacity needs (particularly those related to freeway access)
and will have utility beyond the General Plan update work (e.g., Nexus based fee programs, improvement
project analysis and design, etc.) AFA has carded out numerous General Plan traffic studies in southern
California, and depending upon the circumstances, has applied traffic forecasting procedures ranging from
growth factor methods to comprehensive traffic forecasting models. The methodology proposed here would
refine the current traffic model and then use that refined traffic model to evaluate furore circulation needs
in the City. The growth forecasts developed
Tcmecula General Plan Circulation Element I OOTemcculaGPCircElc.wpd
for the arterial highways in the City would include peak hour volumes for the major intersections, with
particular emphasis on freeway access.
In addressing traffic levels of service and assessing the adequacy of the circulation system, several
special features are proposed here. Innovations that AFA would present for consideration are concepts such
as "augmented capacity," "traffic calming," and different level of service standards for different types of
arterials. One of the issues in the City is highway capacity, particularly in relation to free access. A
suggested approach is for the General Plan to reference a set of "critical intersections" that would be
[egularly updated and which would provide a basis for Capital Improvement planning, long-range project
development, etc. The overall intent is that the General Plan Circulation Element provide more than simply
a reporting of the roadway classifications, and instead provide guidance for addressing problems and seeking
solutions within an overall framework of community goals and objectives.
WORK ITEMS
The following are the list of work items that will be carried out to prepare the Circulation Element
Update.
1. Existing Conditions - In this task, the existing conditions data will be assembled.
Information that will be needed is as follows:
Existing roadway designations and cross-sections.
Existing traffic count data (average daily traffic volumes on roadway segments)
Detailed Waffle count data for the intersections to be analyzed
A cost item has been provided for items ii and iii, it being assumed that.a new set of count data would
prov/de a desirable starting point for the traffic analysis.
2. Traffic Model Preparation'- The existing traffic mode!'will be refined to provide a peak
hour intersection forecasting capability. The intersection count data will be used to carry out a model
validation, and various features will be added to the traffic model to allow it to forecast peak hour
Tcm¢cula General Plan Circulation Element 2 00TemecuiaOPCircElc.wpd
intersection volumes. It is assumed that the current model can be obtained in usable form and the work will
involve the detailed refinement process. Features typically incorporated into such models by AFA includ~
intersection capacity sensitivity and the ability to analyze the effect of different traffic solutions at a
relatively detailed level.
3. Traffic Forecasts - Land use data (existing and future) will be obtained from the City and
suitable trip generation rates applied to derive trip generation by traffic zone. In addition, data from
surrounding areas (existing and future) will be obtained f~om sources such as the RIVSAN traffic model.
Traffic forecasts will then be prepared for the arterial roadway system and key intersections in the City. This
will then be evaluated against level of service standards to identify potential problem areas. Up to two
alternatives will be tested.
4. Special Issues and Features - In this task, special issues noted in thc approach section will
be developed. An intersection level "hot spot" analysis will identify critical locations and sWategies
formulated to address them. Transit opportunities, regional traffic impacts, and desired levels of service of
local streets, and other examples of special topics will be addressed in this task.
5. Circulation Element Preparation - In this task an updated Circulation Element will be
prepared. Work sessions will be held with City Staffto discuss such aspects of the work as potential changes
in the goals and objectives and related policies and programs and the various special issues. A draf~ Element
will then be prepared for review by City Staff and following receipt of comments a final dmf~ will be
prepared.
6. Meetings and Presentations - As part of this work effort, it is anticipated that AFA staff
will attend up to six meetings.
COST ESTIMATE
Estimated cost for this work are summarized in Table 1.
Tcra¢cula General Plan Circulation Element 3 00TemeculaGPCircEl¢.wp d
CITY OF TEMECULA
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND FISCAL ANALYSIS
SCOPE OF WORK
TASK 1 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS
This task will review the City's current Economic Development Strategy as part of the Genera/
Plan update. This review will focus on how well the existing policies are being implemented in
terms of various criteria, such as: jobs generated; wages and skill levels; unemployment and
occupancy rates; and absorption trends. This analysis will build upon existing documents and
studies and reflect the economic vision that is identified thorough the existing policies and
refined through the public participation process
TASK 1.1 TEMECULA IN A REGIONAL ECONOMIC CONTEXT
This task will build upon existing economic documents, including the ongoing Riverside County
and Western Riverside Cotmci] of Governments data bases, to present the economic position of
the City of Temecula in the regional context. That is, how well has the City captured basic and
local serHng jobs and its economic advantages and disadvantages? TEis analysis will assist in
identifying the areas where Temecula can strengthen it competitive position in order to maintain
a strong job base and fiscal balance.
TASK 1.2 PRELIMINARY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GOALS AND POLICIES
This economic development task will build upon the public participation and visioning process
being prepared as part of the General Plan update. Existing economic goals and policies will be
included in a draft document for discussion to provide a fi'amework for any modifications to be
prepared during the drafting of the updated General Plan. Where appropriate, after review and
discdssion, the economic development goals and policies will be updated and refined.
PRODUCT: Economic Goals and Policy Discussion Paper
TASK 2 FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
This task will utilize thc City's fiscal model that has been developed and applied by Stanley R.
Hoffi~an Associates, Inc. The analysis will be prepared for up to two (2) General Plan
alternatives and the Preferred Plan. This will assist the decision makers in understanding the
revenue and cost implications of various options and how to create a fiscally balanced General
Plan that maxin~zes economic opportunities. This work will tie closely with the land use,
infrastructure and economic development policies as part of the overall General Plan update.
TASK 2.1 PREPARATION OF FISCAL ASSU3iPTIONS
This task will prepare the revenue and cost assumptions to be used during the analysis and will
be based on current budget analysis and interviews with key financial, public works and planning
staff. The factors in the City's existing model will be updated to the current budget year. The
various revenue sources will include: property taxes to the City and the Redevelopment Agency,
retail and non-retail sales taxes, transient lodging taxes, franchises, business license taxes,
vehicle code fines, motor vehicle in-lieu taxes, State gasoline taxes, investment income and
ctm'ent fees and charges. Public services will include: general government and administration,
police and fire protection, parks and recreation, community services, public works covering
Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc. Temecula General Plan Update Scope of Work
streets, storm drains and trees and landscaping, plapning and other community development
sen, ices, and other public services as identified.
TASK 2.2 FISCAL I~ACT AIqALYSES
The fiscal analysis will project revenues and costs resulting ~om General Plan land uses at build-
out for up to two (2) General Plan alternatives plus the Preferred Plan. The analysis will present
projected surpluses or deficits as well as revenue/cost ratios. Property tax increment to the
Redevelopment Agency will be presented separately. Also, the fiscal analysis will examine the
relationship between land uses and their respective revenue and cost generation, i.e., how much
revenue per acre is generated by retail versus industrial versus residential land uses.
TASK 2.3 FISCAl, II~IPACT ANALYSIS DOCIJI~IENTATION
This task will prepare a draft fiscal impact report, which would be submitted, to the City for their
staff review along with documentation of all data and assumptions. The review comments would
be discussed with City staff and a final fiscal impact report would be prepared and submitted,
including all data and assumptions. Key fiscal issues will be highlighted, particularly as they
would influence Economic Development policies.
PRODUCT: General Plan Fiscal Analysis Fiscal Impact Report
TASK 3 MEETINGS AND COORDINATION
For thc purposes of budgeting, this task anticipates three (3) staff or public meetings, as follows:
a) Two staff/team meetings, including an initial kickoffmeeting and one to present findings
and recommendations;
b) one public workshop or public hearing
c) attendance at additional meetings will be on time and materials basis, as required.
-Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc. Temecula General Plan Update Scope of Work
Task 1.
Task 2.
Task 2.a.
Task 2.b.
Task 2.c.
Task 3.
Task 3.a.
Task 3. b.
Task 4.
Task 5.
Task 6.
Outline of Work
City of Temecula Generni Plan Update EIR
Kickoff Meeting
Review/Collect Existing Data
Data Acquisition and Review
Data Gaps and Needs Identification
Vegetation Mapping (fi.om aerial photos provided by City)
Prepare Biological Resources Section for Screencheck Draft EIR/EA
Describe current Conditions, Sensitive Species Presence, and Determine Significance
Thresholds
Impact Analysis and Reporting
Revise Biological Section Based on Lead Agency Comments
Prepare Responses to Public Comments Received on EIR/EA
Additional Meetings
MERKEL'& ASSOCIATES, INC
Scope of Work
The proposed Noise Element technical update study will meet all of the requirements of
Section 65302(I') of the Government Code, and the noise element guidelines. The
lb l lowing scope of work provides a description of the measurement program and analysis
to be provided as part of the proposed effort:
Noise measurements will be obtained at representative locations throughout the City.
Noise from the freeways, arterials, and flight operations at French Valley Airport will
be measured at typical residential locations. All measurement locations will be
subject to the approval of City staff. Representative samples of the noise produced by
commercial, industrial and community sources within the City will also be obtained
and presented as part of the study. All data will be obtained by use of precision
integrating sound level meters. In particular, the following will be included in the
measurement program:
· The Route 15 freeway.
· The Route 79 highway.
Local arterials.
· Flight operations at French Valley Airport.
· Local commercial/industrial plants.
· Other stationary ground noise sources that contribute to the community noise
environment.
At least 20 locations will be selected to establish representative examples of fixed and
transportation-related noise sources. These measurements will be obtained during
peak and off-peak traffic periods as considered appropriate. Twenty-four hour noise
measurements will be obtained at 8 locations adjacent to major arterials, the airport
and the freeway. Limited (15 to 30 minute) measurements will be obtained at the
remaining 12 locations. We will coordinate with the Client to identify appropriate
fixed noise generators for our measurements.
We will prepare a map to be included in the draft Noise Element identifying the
location of each noise measurement position. It is understood that the Client will
provide appropriate base maps for this purpose.
COTTON/13ELAND/ASSOCIATES
Proposal File P327-00
3. We will prepare a table to be included in the draft Noise Element identifying the
uoise levels measured at each location.
4. Using traffic data provided by the Client and the noise measurement results of Task I,
we will perform an analysis to determine the existing and future traffic noise levels
adjacent to the arterials and freeway. The analysis will be performed using the traffic
noise model developed by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA-RD-77-108).
5. We will prepare a table that identifies, for each segment of arterial and freeway
studied in the City, the location of the traffic noise contours relative to the arterial's
centerline. The contours will be developed using either the community noise
equivalent level (CNEL) or the day-night sound level (Ldn) metric, as desired by the
Client.
We will obtain and review the noise contours developed for French Valley Airport.
We will prepare contour maps for the existing and future noise environments in the
City of Temecula. The maps will identify the location of the composite (traffic,
airport, etc.) noise contours throughout the City. It is understood that the Client will
also provide appropriate base maps for the noise contours.
Noise Measurement Instrumentation
Thc instrumentation required to perform a noise study is owned and operated by Wieland
Associates, Inc. Such instrumentation includes the following precision, calibrated
equipment:
· Sound level meters, for measuring A-weighted sound levels,
· Real-time analyzers, for measuring 1/3-octave band noise spectra, and
· Graphic level recorders, to provide a physical display of the measured sound levels.
Certificates of instrument calibration are available as required to support the work effort.
Computer Modeling
Wieland Associates, Inc. has fully implemented the following models on its computers:
The Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA's) highway traffic noise prediction
model (FHWA-RD-77-108)
The State of California Department of Transportation's (Caltrans') Sound32 traffic
noise model
EXHIBIT B
PROPOSED PROJECT BUDGET
R:\GENPLAN~Comp Plan Update~CBA Contract CC.doc
.City of Temecl
, Ovem~ Plan praparat~n (C~A)
, HourlyRate: $125 $110 $90 S70 $65
Task PIC/PM Hsg. Spec Sr. Pier. Planner Planner
Task I Refine Work Program/Conduct Background Analysis ~ ~ ~ ~
1.1 Refine Work Program 81 . 8
1.2 Prepare P~gmm Notebcmks
1.3 Conduct Initiation To~ wtlh City Staff 8 8 8 8
1.4 Collect and Review Background Data . 8 16 24 24
1.5 La~d Use Suwey 4 8 16 16
1.6 IN~m~-w City Staff 8 ill
1.7 Bas~g~ound Working Pape~ 8 16 t6
1.8 Develop GIS Information and Base Map
1.9 Commma'ty Database 2 16
1.10 Webslte 2 8
Total Task1 54 161 76 64 88,
Task 2 IssUeS Identification. ~ ~ ...... ~ ~ ~
2.1 summa~ Memm-andma- ImlX~ant Issues 2 2 4
2-2 PC/CC S~dy SessiOn 4 4 4
2*8 F,~ Co~ Workshop 2 2 4
2.4 Gene~ Plan Newsletter - . 4 6 4 4
Total Task 2 12 2 16 8 12
Task 3 Develop Goals. and Policies ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
3.1 Dratt Pmamlnary Issues. Goals. and Po6des 4 4 8 16
3.2 Pmp~e Go~. Policies. and Objectives Won~g Paper 4 4 8 1
~.3 PC/CC Study Session 4~ ~* 8 4 4
*Total ?ask 3 121 8 ~ 24 2C 36
Task 4 Land Use/Circulation/Housing AJlsmatlves ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~.1 Dev~bp Alternatives C.o~.~v:~ 12 4 8 16
~..2 Prepare Land Use, C3r~d~a~l. and Ho~ing Altemafivas 4 4 8 16
(.3 ~ Wod~hop 4 8~ 4 4
4.4 PC/CC Saxly Sessio~ 4 81 8 4
Total TaM( 4 28 4 221 28 40
Task 5 Prepare Draft General Plan and Implementation Program ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
5.~ Prepare Preaninay D~t General p~as ~ ~0 ~ SC 2o0 2SO
5.2 ~ Wodmmp 4 4 4
5.4 'P~-e Implemsntatlon Pm~ram 4 1E 16 20,
Total Task $ 72 3( 170 220 2781
6.1 Contact end Consult Raspoasl~e Agencies 4
8.2 Prepare ~ Draft EIR 4 4~ 100
6.3 Revise Draft EIR 4 8 16 18
8.4 Draft EIR for Public Review 4 8 16
6.5 Prepare F'alal EIR 4 4 8
5.6 Prepare Support Docuz/~,:-.~ 8 8 8
Total Task 6 t6 72 1481 148
Task 7 Public Hearings and General Plan Adoption ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~.1 Ptasn~g Commlosion I-k~..a~ 8
F.2 C~ Couasg Hea~s 8
Total Task 7 16
Task 8 Roal General Plait anti Land Use Map ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
8.1 Pmliminay Fioal Plan and Map 8 8 ~8 t6
Total Task a 12 12 24 32
Total Task 9 601 16 30
Total General Plan Program Hours (not including direct costs and the optional task) 2821 76 416 5t2 634
Other Direct Costs (refer to poge 2 for a detailnd description, of "Othe[ Direct Costa') ~~~~
M~ane~us Costs (tmve~none~e)
Total nln~t ~
Total General Plan Program .
necula General Plan - Program Budget
;lion (CI3A) Tot~ P,m-c~m
[ ~/5 I $7~ Team Membem of Total
$~ i ~ ~ C~ S1~ $110 $1~ P~
P~ GI~G~ ~ C~ ~ AFA ~ ~ WA ~ ~ '
4 ~ ~0
8 ~,680
24 24 $8,120: 50 1~ ~ ~ 16 $~,~ ~1,~
16 20 4 ~,~1 ~,~
$1,~1 $1~
16 8 8 .. ~,7~ ~,7~
30 4 ~.~ ~,~
16 8 8 ~,~ . ~,~;
8 8 4 $1,47( $1,47(
~ 1~ 32 ~,~ 50 1~ ~ ~ ~ 1E ~,~ $~,~ 2~
4 $1,01C $1,01~
4 41 2 $1,47C $1,47~
4 6 $1,~ $1~
4 4 ~.~
16 8 ~.1~ ~,I~
16 8 ~,1~ ~,1~
~ ~ ~ $~4,~0 287 7C ~,~ ~,~ ~ ~
4 4 $~ ,4~ ~
4 4 $1,3~ $1,~
20 8 ~
16 8 ~i 40 21 ~.~8
16 8 ~ 20 $1,5~
8 4 4 ~,3~ ~.3~
8 4 $1,~ $1,~
$1,~ $1,~
$1,~ $1,~
16 8 ~,~ ~,~
~////////~//////~ ~//~///~/~////~//~ ~///~//~ ~///////~//~/~/~//////~///////~ ~//////~///~//////~ ~/~//~/////~
~///////~ ~//////~ ~/~///~ ~//~//////~/~ ~/~////~ ~////~ ~//~////~ ~///~ ~/~/~ ~//~///////////~ ~////////~/~
EXHIBIT C
PROPOSED SCHEDULE
R:\GENPLAN\Comp Plan Update\CBA Contract CC.doc
SJ.3~OOl:ld Nl:lO/l/t (]NV S3JS¥/ NOI.LVdl311I:JVd Ol'l;ll~d
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Members of the/~/gunc[I
Debbie Ubnosk~', Director of Planning
March 6, 2001
Additional Recommendation for Item No. 5
Please add the following recommendation to Agenda Report recommendations for the Award of
the contract to update the City General Plan.
"Authorize the City Manager to approve contract amendments up to the
amount of $25,000."
R:\GENPLAN\Comp Plan Update~vlemo to CC on Additional Recommendation.doc
1
ITEM 6
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
APPROVAL
CITY MANAGER ,~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager
March 6, 2001
City Street Banner Vendor
Prepared by: Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the contract with Kelley Display,
Inc. for the not to exceed amount of $33,000.00 for a 16 month term through June 30, 2002.
BACKGROUND:
On September 27, 1996, Kelley Display, Inc. was awarded a contract to provide custom banner
services for the City of Temecula. This firm has been responsible for providing the following
services to the City: manufacturing as well as the storage and cleaning of the City banners that
are located on Rancho California and Winchester Roads.
Several non-profit organizations in Temecula had requested that the City provide them with
assistance for advertising and informing the public of their community events occurring in the
City via city street banners. There have been discussions at City marketing meetings regarding
this. As a result of the discussions, the Economic Development Subcommittee, consisting of
Councilmembers Comerchero and Roberts, recommended that the City expand the existing
banner program to include City sponsored events such as the Temecula Rod Run, Arts in The
Country Festival and the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival.
Due to the time element of The Arts in the Country and the Balloon & Wine festivals, this is the
only banner company that can satisfy our purchase requirement within our special events time
frame. Kelley Display is a proven company as other City departments have utilized their
services. Thus, City banners are stored and cleaned at one central location.
This agreement is for an estimated amount not to exceed $33,000. Banner quotes have been
provided for the two upcoming special events, the Arts in the Country Festival and the Temecula
Valley Balloon and Wine Festival and are included in this agreement amount. All other banners
will be separately quoted at vadous times within the next eighteen months depending on the
time of the special event and/or season.
FISCAL IMPACT: $12,000 is available in the FY 2000-01 Economic Development
Department Operating Budget for the banner program. Banner expenditures for FY2001-02 will
be budgeted as a placeholder in the forthcoming Operating Budget pending City Council
approval of the FY2001-02 Operating Budget.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1: Estimated Banner Program Quotes Through June 30,
2002
Attachment 2: Banner Purchase/Storage/CleaninglShipping Agreement
ATTACHMENT 1
ESTIMATED BANNER PROGRAM QUOTES THROUGH JUNE 30, 2002
Estimated Banner Program Quotes Through June 30, 2002
No. of Banners Reorders
Hot Air Balloon Banners (5) 117
American Flag Banners (2) 108 Need 7
Fall Grape Banners (4) 113 Need 2
Rod Run/Rod Run Revisited Banners 40 Need 18
Seasons Greeting Banner (4) 55 Need 3
Temecula Xmas Banners 58
Film Festival Banners 58 Need 58
*Arts Festival Banners (4) 58
*Balloon & Wine Fest. Banners (2) 55
*Being purchaed out of 2000/01 Budget
*Date changes, will come out of 2001/02 Budget
$890.00
$560.00
$1,840.00
$640.00
$5,220.00
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
Charge for Dates changes: $22.50 each banner (both sides of Banner) - $6,525.00
Cleaning & Storage: $2.50 each banner - $1,883.00
Freight Charges: $1,800.00
Hardware: $500.00
Total of All Charges: $29,858.00
Estimated Budget: $33,000.00 with tax and misc. costs
ATTACH MENT 2
PURCHASE/STORAGE/CLEANING/SHIPPING AGREEMENT
CITY OF TEMECULA
PURCHASE/STORAGE/CLEANING/SHIPPING AGREEMENT
This Purchase/Storage/Cleaning/Shipping Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of
March 6, 2001, by and between the City of Temceula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and Kelley Display, Inc.
("Vendor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. Term. This Agreement shah commence as of March 6, 2001 and shallremain and continue in
effect until tasks described therein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2002, unless sooner ~xminated pursuant
to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. Purehase/SaledStorage/Cleanhig and Shir~Din~, of Banners. On and subject to the t~ms and
conditions set forth in this Agreement and the Contract Deeuments, Vendor agrees to manufacture, sell and deliver to the
City the street banners as more particularly described in Exhibit A, Description of Bauners, attached hereto and incorporated
herein as though set forth in full (hereafter "Banners").
3. Purehase/Storage/Clenning/Shim~iw, Price. The Purchase, Storage, Cleaning aad Shipping
price which City agrees to pay to Vendor for the Banners shall not exceed Thirty-thrce Thousand Dollars ($33,000.00) The
Purchase price is final and shall be paid by the City to Vendor in accordance with the following schedule: thirty (30) days
after receipt of product.
4. Scope of Work. Vendor shah manufacture, clean, store and ship the banners. Vendor shall
provide and furnish all labor, and materials, required for the Work. All of said Work to be performed and materials to be
furnished for thc Work shall be in strict accordance with the specifications set forth in the Scope of Work. The Work shall be
completed within the time set forth in the Agreement Term (item # 1 ). Vendor shall not enmmenco the Work until such lime
as directed by the City.
Representations and Warranties of Vendor. Vendor makes the following representations and
warranties to City:
a. Authority and Consents. Vendor has the right, power, legal capacity and authority to
enter into and perform its obligations under this Agreemenl. No approvals or consents of any persons are
necessary in connection with Vendor's execution, delivery, and performance of this Agreement, except
for such as have been obtained on or prior to the date hereof. The execution, deliver, and performance
of this Agreement by Vendor have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of Vendor
and constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of Vendor, euforeeable against Vendor in
accordance with their respective terms.
b. Title and Condition. Vendor has good and marketable title to all of the Banners
manufactured. All of the Banners are free and clear of any reslrictions on or conditions to transfer or
assi~onrneut, and City will acquire absolute title to all of the Banners Ii'ce and clear uf mortgages, liens,
pledges, charges, encumbrances, equities, claims, covenants, conditions and restrictions except for such
as may be created or granted by City. All of the Banners are in good condition, are free of any defects,
and are in conformity with the specifications, descriptions, representations and warranties set for, bin the
Conlraet Documents. Vendor is aware the City is purchasing the Banners for use on street light poles
and that City is relying on Vendor's warranties that the Banners are fit for this purpose and the ordinary
purposes for which the Banners are normally used.
c. Full Disclosure. None of the representations and warranties made by Vendor in this
Agreement contains or will contain any untrue statement of a material fact, or omits to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which thc3' were made,
not misleading.
-1-
6. Performance. Vendor shall at all times faithfully, competently end to the best of his or her
ability, experience, and talent perform all tasks deseribed herein. Vendor shall employ, at a minimum, generally aceepted
standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Vendur hereunder in
meeting its obligations under this Agreement.
7. City Approval. All labor, materials, and services shall be furnished end work performed end
completed subject to the approval of the City or its authorized representatives, and the quality of the workmanship shall be
guarenteed for four years from date of aeceptence. City shall inspect the Benners at the time end Pince of delivery. If, inthe
determination of City, the Banners fail to conform to the Agreement IN ANY MANNER OR RESPECT, City shall so notify
Vendor within ten (10) days of delivery of the Banners to City. Failing such notice, the Banners shallb~ deemed accepted by
City as of the date of receipt.
8. Time of Delivery. The date of delivery of the Banners shall be on or before March 27, 2001.
9. Place of Delivery. The Banucrs shallbe delivered to this loention: 43200BusinessParkDfive,
Temecula, CA 92589-9033.
10. Reiectlon. In the event of such notice of non-conformity by City pursuent to Section 6, City
may, at its option, (1) reject the whole of the Banners, or (2) accept the whole of the Banners. The exercise of any of the
above options shah be "without prejudice" and with full reservation of any fights end remedies of City attendant upon a
breach. In the event of such notice and election by City, City agrees to comply with all reasonable instructions of Vendor
and, in the event that expenses are incurred by City in following such instructions, Vendor shall indemnify City in full for
such expenses.
11. No Replacements of Cure. This Agreement calls for strict complience. Vendor expressly
agrees that both the Banners and Storage tendered and the tender itseffwill conform fully to the terms end conditions of the
Agreement on the original tender. In the event nf rejection by City of the whole of the Banners or any part thereofpursuent
to Section 8, City may, but is not required to, accept any substitute performance from Vendor or engage in subsequent efforts
to effect a cure of the original tender by Vendor.
12. Indemnification. Vendor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect end hold hamaless the City, its
officers, officials, employees, agents end volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, damages, costs
end liability of eny kind or nature which the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers may sustain or incur
or which may be imposed upon them for injmy to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of or from the
Banners or Vendor's maintenence thereof, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City.
13. Default of Vendor.
a. The Vendor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shah constitute a default.
In the event the Vendor is in default for eanse under the terms of this Agreement, the Cily shall have no obligation or duty to
continue compensating Vendor for any work performed aller the date of default and can terminate this Agreement
immediately by written notice to the Vendor. If such failure by the Vendor to make progress in the performence of work
hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Vendor's control, and without fault or negligence of the Vendor, it shall not be
considered a default.
.b. ff the City Menager or his delegate determines the Vendor is in default in the Performance clunY
of the terms or conditions nf this Agreement, it shall service the Vendor with written notice of the default. The Vendor shall
have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactmy performance, hi
the event the Vendor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding eny
other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice end without prejudice to eny other
remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.
-2-
14. Liability Insurance. Vendor shah procure and maintain for the duration of the eonlraet
insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to properly, which may arise from or in connection with the
performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Vendor shall maintain limits no less than:
(l)
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injmy, p~rsonal injury and
properly damage. If Commercial General Linbilily Insurance or other form with a
general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shah apply
separately to this projcet/locatiun er the general aggregate limit shall be twice the
required occurrence limit.
(2)
Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability:
$1,000,000 per accident fur bodily injury or disease.
the following provisions:
Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability policy is to contain, or be endorsed to contain,
(l)
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured
as respects: liability arising out of ectivifies performed by or on behaffofthe Vendor,
products and completed operations of the Vendor; premises owned, occupied or used
by the Vendor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Vendor. The
coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the
City, its officers, offieinls, employees or volunteers.
(2)
For any claims related to the banners/storage and cleaning, the Vendor's insurence
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City, its
officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Vendor's insurance
and shah not contribute with it.
(3)
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including
breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers,
officials, employees or volunteers.
(4)
The Vendor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is
made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
(5)
Each insurance policy required by this clause shah be endorsed to state that coverage
shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in
limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt
requested, has been given to the City.
c. Aceeptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's
rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
d. Verification of Coverage. Vendor shall furnish the City with original endorsements effeeting
coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage
un its behall: The endorsements are to be un forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved
by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Vendor's insurer may provide complete,
certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these
specifications.
-3-
15. Survival of Representations and Warrantlas. All represcntations, warranties, covenants and
agreements of the parties contained in tiffs Agreement shall survive the execution, delivery, and performance of this
Agreement.
16. ~onsibllities. The Vendor shall keep itself informed of Slate and Federal laws and
regulations, which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way, affect the performance of its service pursuant to
this Agreement. The Vendor shah at aH times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its
officers and employees, shah not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Vendor to comply with this section.
17. PROHIBITED I~TEREST. No officer, or employee of the City of Temeeula shall have any
fmancial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Vendor, or Vendor's sub-contractors for this
agreement, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Vendor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no
officer or employee of the City of Temeeula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in
this transaction, or in the business of the Vendor or Vendor's sub-contractors. Vendor fitrther agrees to notify the Cityin the
event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement.
18. Independent Vendor. Vendor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly
independent Vendor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of the Vendor shall at all times
be under the Vendor's exclusive direction and control. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees, agents or
volnntcers shall have control over the conduct of the Vendor or any of the Vendor's offieem, employees, agents or volunteers
except as set forth in this Agreement. Vendor shall not at any lime or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers,
employees or agents are in any manner, officers, employees or agents of the City of Temeenla. Vendor shall not incur or
have the power.to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against the City, or bind the City in any manner.
19 Assignment. The Vendor shah not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part
thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City.
20. Notices. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this
Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable deement deliveff
service, suer as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or ('fii) mailing
in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set
forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice:
To Vendor at:
To City at:
Kelley Display, Inc.
p.o. Box 671
3825 Gregory Ave.
West Sacramento, CA 95691
City of Temeeula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temeeula, California 92589
Alta: City Manager
21. Governing Law. The City and Vendor understand and agree that the laws of the State of
California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the
intexpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior or
federal district court with jurisdiction over the City of Temecela.
22. Entire A~rrement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties
relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements,
understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement based solely upon the
representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems
material.
-4-
23. Authori*¥ To Execute This A~reement. 1~¢ p~son or persuns executing this Agreement on
behalf of Vendor warrants and represents thal he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Vendor
and has the authority to bind Vendor to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IIII
-5-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have duly executed in on
the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Jeff Comerchero
Mayor
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
Vendor
Ron Kelley
Kelley 'Display, Inc.
-6-
ITEM 7
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City ManagedCity Council
~/~A/illiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: March 6, 2001
SUBJECT:
Acquisition of Tax-Defaulted Property for Open Space Habitat Creation
and Preservation Area, and/or Public Park/Pedestrian Access Purposes
Prepared By: ~eryl Yasinosky, Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council Adopt a Resolution Entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA OBJECTING TO THE PUBLIC SALE OF CERTAIN
TAX DEFAULTED PROPERTY LYING WITHIN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, OFFERING TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY FOR
OPEN SPACE HABITAT CREATION AND PRESERVATION
AREA AND/OR PUBLIC PARK/PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
PURPOSES
BACKGROUND: The City has received notice from the County of Riverside
Treasurer-Tax Collector of certain parcels lying within the City limits that are in tax-default and
offered for public sale. Four (4) vacant parcels have been identified as useable property to
mitigate Open Space Habitat Creation and Preservation requirements for Capital Improvement
Projects and/or potential Public Park/Pedestrian Access improvements. The City may acquire
these tax-defaulted parcels pursuant to a Chapter 8 Agreement of Sale with the County for the
minimum purchase prices indicated, as follows:
Assessment Number Property Description and Use Purchase Price
922-045-011-8 .05 acres of vacant commercial property/Main
Street @ Murrieta Creek (Habitat or Pedestrian
Access) $ 5,015.37
922-110-032-8 2.03 acres, vacant commercial property/Murrieta
Creek, west of Front Street (Habitat Area) $ 94,556.85
922-220-029-6 15.72 acres, misc. vacant property/Temecula
Creek, west of 1-15 (Habitat Area) $ 9,087.35
957-120-005-9 20 acres, vacant residential/Santa Gertrudis Creek,
south of Nicolas Road (Habitat or Park Site) $ 63,472.11
TOTAL $172,131.68
R:\agdrpt\01\0306\Property.Acq.tax-default
The above referenced purchase price for all four parcels is $172,131.68. Additional costs will
include $175.00 per parcel ($700.00) to pay for publication of the legal notices and lot book
reports required by the County. The Treasurer-Tax Collector's Office has indicated the actual
purchase amounts will be due and payable to the County in approximately 5-8 months, or after
the beginning of Fiscal Year 2001-2002.
However, in order for the City to enter into an Agreement of Sale for these parcels, the County
requires that the City Council approve the following resolution, which indicates the City's
objection to the public sale of the property, the intended offer to purchase the property, and the
public purpose for which the land will be devoted. This action does not interfere in any way
with the property owner's ability to cure the tax default. Rather, this action places the City in first
position should the property owner(s) not redeem the property.
FISCAL IMPACT: Appropriation of the required funds for the acquisition of these propedies
and the related costs associated with the legal notices and reports will be identified in the Fiscal
Year 2001-2002 Capital Improvement Program.
ATTACHMENT:
1. Resolution No. 2001-
2. Vicinity Maps
2 R:\agdrpt\01\0306\Propedy.Acq.tax-default
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA OBJECTING TO PUBLIC SALE OF CERTAIN TAX
DEFAULTED PROPERTY LYING WITHIN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, OFFERING TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY FOR
OPEN SPACE HABITAT CREATION AND PRESERVATION AREA
AND/OR PUBLIC PARK/PEDESTRIAN ACCESS PURPOSES
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula has determined that certain tax-defaulted parcels of
property is within the City of Temecula and the City desires to purchase said parcel for public
purposes; and
WHEREAS, the Riverside County Treasurer and Tax Collector has determined the
purchase price for which such parcels may be acquired by the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City does hereby object to the sale of four parcels of land, located in
the City of Temecula and described below:
Assessor's Parcel Number: 922-045-011-8
.05 acres (vacant)
Legal Description: See attached Exhibit A
Purchase Price: $5,015.37
Assessor's Parcel Number: 922-110-032-8
2.03 acres (vacant)
Legal Description: See attached Exhibit B
Purchase Price: $94,556.85
Assessor's Parcel Number: 922-220-029-6
15.72 acres (vacant)
Legal Description: See attached Exhibit C
Purchase Price: $9,087.35
Assessor's Parcel Number: 957-120-005-9
20 acres (vacant)
.Legal Description: See attached Exhibit D
Purchase Price: $63,472.11
Section 2. The City of Temecula does hereby offer to purchase these parcels of land
identified in Section 1 above, from the Riverside County Treasurer and Tax Collector pursuant
to the provisions of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, Chapter 8, Section 3371, et al.
In such forms as the Riverside County and Tax Collector shall specify.
Section 3. The City hereby certifies to the Riverside County Treasurer and Tax
Collector that the public purpose for which the parcel of land will be devoted is as follows:
Open Space Habitat Creation and Preservation Areas, and/or Public
Park/Pedestrian Access Purposes.
R:~agdrpt\01 \0306\.Properly. Acq.tax-de faultreso
Section 4. The City Manager of the City of Temecula is hereby authorized to execute
any and all such Chapter 8 Agreements for Sale to carry out the purposes of this Resolution,
and to forthwith pay to the Riverside County Treasurer and Tax Collector, the full purchase price
therefore, as specified in Section 1, together with all costs of giving notice pursuant to statute, in
full recognition that such costs are in addition to, and not included within the purchase price. In
addition, the City agrees to pay publication costs incurred even if the property is redeemed, and
therefore not conveyed to the City, and to pay the full costs of Lot Book Reports, which City
further recognizes to be non-refundable fees.
Section 5. The City Manager is further authorized to execute any and all other
documents, agreements and certifications required or desirable to consummate the purchase
contemplated hereunder.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula, this 6th day of March, 2001.
ATTEST:
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No.
2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula, California
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 6th day of March, 2001, by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Cler~Agency Secre~ry
R:~gd~t\01 \0306\.Propeny. Acq.tax4e faultreso
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description
APN: 922-045-011-8 (.05 acres)
The land referred to in this repod is situated in the State of California, County of Riverside, City
of Temecula and is described as follows:
The Southeasterly 10 feet of Main Street vacated by Resolution 75-104, recorded April 23, 1975
as Instrument No. 46491 of Official Records of Riverside County, California, lying within River
Street, together with that portion of River Street, as vacated by Resolution recorded August 6,
1940 in Book 474 Page 109 of Official Records of Riverside County, California, as shown by
Map of the Townsite of Temecula on file in Book 15 Page 726 of Maps, Records of San Diego
County, California, described as follows:
Beginning at the most Westerly corner of Block 28, as shown on said Map above described;
Thence Southwesterly on the Southeasterly line of Main Street extended Southwesterly, a
distance of 87 feet;
Thence Southeasterly in a straight line to a point on the Northwesterly boundary of Third Street,
as shown on said map, extended Southwesterly, which point is 35 feet Southwesterly from the
most Southerly corner of said Block 28;
Thence Northeasterly on the Northwesterly boundary of Third Street extended 35 feet;
Thence Northwesterly on the Northeasterly boundary of River Street, 300 feet to the Point of
Beginning;
Excepting Therefrom that portion conveyed to Leverne Parker, Trustee of any successor
Trustee of the Leverne Parker Trust under Trust Agreement dated November 20, 1980 by Deed
recorded December 2, 1980 as Instrument No. 224898 of Official Records of Riverside County,
California.
RSagd~t\01 \0306\.Property. Acq,tax-de faultreso
APN: 922-110-032-8 (2.03 acres)
EXHIBIT B
Legal Description
The land referred to in this report is situated in the Sate of California, County of Riverside, City
of Temecula and is described as follows:
Lot 10 in Block 32 of the Townsite of Temecula as filed in Book 15, page 726 of Maps, San
Diego County Records.
R:~agdrpt\01 \0306\.Property. Acq.tax4e faultreso
APN: 922-220-029-6 (15.72 acres)
EXHIBIT C
Legal Description
Portions of Lots 26 and 27 in Book 1 as per map of subdivision of land of the Pauba Land and
Water Company recorded in Map 11, Page 507 of San Diego County.
Beginning at the Westerly corner of Lot 26, thence North 44° 50'01" East, 500.00 Feet along the
Northwesterly line of said Lot 26; thence South 48°11'55" East, 790.00 feet to the true point of
beginning; thence continuing South 48°11'55" East, 110.00 feet; thence South 45° 37'16" East,
635.23 feet to that parcel of land conveyed to the State of California by deed recorded March
30, 1948, in Book 905, Page 101, Official Records of Riverside County; thence Southerly along
the following three (3) courses of the Westerly line of the State Freeway Right of Way; South 6°
24'00" West, 250.00 feet; thence along a curve concave Easterly having a radius of 1,700.00
feet, through and angle of 5055'27'' a distance of 175.77 feet to a radial bearing South 89°31'27"
East, thence South 0°28'33'' West,550.82 feet to the Southwesterly line of Lot 27, thence
Northwesterly along the Southwesterly line of Lots 27 and 26, North 40°45'36'' West, a distance
of 1,403.58 feet to a point 793.54 feet Southeasterly of the most Westerly corner of Lot 26,
thence North 44036'56" East, 602.76 feet to the true point of beginning and containing 15.715
Acres.
R:~agdrpt\01 \0306\.Property.Acq.tax-de faultreso
EXHIBIT D
Legal Description
APN: 957-120-005-9
Parcel 1:
That podibn of Section 20, Township 7 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Meridian, in the
County of Riverside, State of California, shown as Parcel 25 on a Parcel Map recorded in Book
P-l, Pages 44, 45 and 46 of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County.
Parcel 2:
A non-exclusive easement for ingress, egress, road and public utility purposes over those
portions of Section 20 and 29, Township 7 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Meridian, in
the County of Riverside, State of California, delineated and shown on a Parcel Map recorded in
Book P-l, Pages 44, 45 and 46 of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said
County as "Road and Utility Easements".
R:~agd~t\01 \0306\.PropeCty. Acq.tax<lefaultreso
VICINITY/LOCATION MAPS
110032
ITEM 8
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY '~-~2,~ ~
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER ,/~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
/~illiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
March 6, 2001
Award of Construction Contract for the City Maintenance Facility
Modifications, Phase Ill, Project No. PW00-16
PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Senior Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Award a contract for the City Maintenance Facility Modifications, Phase III, Project No.
PW00-16 to T & M Construction for $600,000 and authorize the Mayor to execute the
contract.
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $60,000, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
Approve a transfer of $80,000 in Capital Project Reserves from the Rainbow Canyon South
Interchange Project to the City Maintenance Facility Modifications, Phase III, Project No.
PW00-16.
BACKGROUND: On January 23, 2001 Council rejected all original bids, and approved the
revised Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to
solicit construction bids for the City Maintenance Facility Modifications - Phase Ill; Project No.
PW00-16.
The work included in the original plans and specifications involved modifying the existing
maintenance facility by adding approximately 3,000 square feet to provide sufficient workspace for
City Hall staff, and have the ability to accommodate future staff. The project would have completed
the second floor over the remainder of the building, including the installation of an elevator and
restrooms, but did not include any interior walls. The first floor would also have been expanded
with an approximate 900 square foot addition. The engineer's estimate was $475,000.00.
The space planning committee finalized the workspace assignments after bids for the original
modifications were opened. The final workspace plan required that three (3) additional office
spaces and a conference room be constructed. In addition, the City Clerk requested that a high-
density modular filing system be installed in the new record storage area. This request resulted in
the need to modify the building's structural support system. In an attempt to expedite the project
and avoid delays required to re-bid the project, the City requested a cost proposal for these minor
changes from the lowest responsible bidder during the plan revision process. Several questions
arose during the preparation of the change order cost proposal. Upon receipt of the $75,000+ cost
proposal, it was determined that the changes were more significant than anticipated and warranted
rejection of all bids and re-advertisement of the project once the plans and specifications had been
clarified to insure competitive bids.
I
r:~agdrpt\01 ~0306\pw99-01 .awd/
Five (5) bids were received and publicly opened on February 20, 2001 and results were as follows:
2.
3.
4.
5.
T&M Construction .................................... $600,000
W.B. Allen Construction ........................... $615,000
The Tyree Organization ........................... $616,000
The Bergman Companies ........................ $639,850
Best Western Contractors ........................ $724,523
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
Staff has reviewed the bid proposals and found T & M Construction of Alta Loma to be the lowest
responsible bidder for this project. Staff has contacted references and determined that T & M
Construction has satisfactorily performed similar type of work in the past.
The specifications allow seventy five (75) working days for completion of this project.
The Engineer's estimate for this project was $510,000. Inquiries into the major components of the
contractor's bid noted that the cost of the new elevator was more than double what the architect
originally estimated and the new perimeter equipment screen on the roof of the existing building
also significantly exceeded the original estimate.
FISCAL IMPACT: The City Maintenance Facility Modifications Project is a Capital Improvement
Project funded through Capital Project Reserves, Account No. 210-190-158-5804. Adequate funds
are available for the transfer of $80,000 from the Rainbow Canyon South Interchange to the City
Maintenance Facility Modifications Project. The total construction cost is $660,000, which includes
the contract amount of $600,000 plus 10% contingency of $60,000.
ATTACHMENT:
1. Project Location
2. Project Description
3. Contract
2
r:~agdrpt\O1\O306~pw99-01 .awd/
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW00-16
CITY MAINTENANCE FACILITY ALTERATIONS PHASE III
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 6TM day of March, 200'1, by and between the City
of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and T & M
Construction, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WlTNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree
as follows:
.8,
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract
Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance
Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO.
PW00-'I6, CITY MAINTENANCE FACILITY ALTERATIONS PHASE III, Insurance
Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of
California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where
specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version
of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements
as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern
California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California
(hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications,
Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW00-16, CITY
MAINTENANCE FACILITY ALTERATIONS PHASE III. Copies of these Standard
Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building New, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials,
and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General
Specifications, Special Provision, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO.
PW00-16, CITY MAINTENANCE FACILITY ALTERATIONS PHASE III.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract
Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in
lieu of, such conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in
complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed
and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise
specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and
incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
CONTRACT CA-1 R:\ClP~projects\pw00-16\contract
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be
as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other
Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed,
shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable
equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW00-16, CITY MAINTENANCE FACILITY ALTERATIONS PHASE III
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict
accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract
Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished
and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to
the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. The CITY agrees to pay, and
CONTRACTOR agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the
sum of: SIX HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS and NO CENTS ($600,000.00), the
total amount of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed seventy five (75)
working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction
shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except
that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order,
changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as
established by the City Council.
pAYMENTS
LUMP SUM BID SCEHDULE:
Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to
the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the
work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its
accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the
City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's
payment requests.
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days
after submission of a payment request to the CITY, the CONTRACTOR shall be
paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed
according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or
about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses.
The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be
made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR
CONTRACT CA-2 R:~ClP~projects~pw00-16~contract
filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on
forms provided by the CITY.
Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law,
accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work
for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the
terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under
the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be
considered as an acceptance of any part of the work.
Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty
(30) days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract
Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference.
In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code, a reduction in the
retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the
Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project
is more than 50% complete. The Council hereby delegates authority to reduce
the retention to the Engineer.
WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is
recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty
performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following
schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
$25,000 0 $75,000
RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE
180 days 3%
$75,00- $500,000
180 days
$2,250 + 2%ofamountin
excess of $75,000
Over $500,000
One Year
$10,750 + 1% of amount
in excess of $500,000
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government
Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of
one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed
beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be
deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum
shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR.
CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated
damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or
negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is
required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay.
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph
6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as
to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of
the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a
release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be
required to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for
payment.
CONTRACT CA-3 R:\ClP~projects~pw00-16~conb'act
10.
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of
the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per
diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each
craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the
Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City
Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula.
CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the
adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the
provisions of Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each
laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for
any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in
violation of the provisions of the Contract.
11. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
12.
INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction
or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR
alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its
offibers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or
indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the CITY for any
and all costs incurred by the CITY as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project.
The CITY shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the
CITY.
13.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents,
or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing
favorable treatment with respect thereto.
14.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with an~, City officer or employee,
or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been
employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
15.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors
upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against
the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has
been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
CONTRACT CA-4 R:\ClP~projects~pwO0-16~contract
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge
that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely
performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof,
including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY.
BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part
thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable
times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner
as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and
acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final
inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will
not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion,
national origin, color, sex age, or handicap.
GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the
State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties
to this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation
concerning this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district
court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation
between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the
Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs
incurred in the litigation.
PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or
of a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the
proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter.
Furthermore, the contractodconsultant covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no
board member, officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether
contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business
of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest
comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all
such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such
interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with
Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the
Government Code of the State of California.
ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor
is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-
336, as amended.
CONTRACT CA-5 R:\ClP~projects~pwO0-16~conffact
23.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents,
and to the CITY addressed as follows:
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
CONTRACT CA-6 R:\CiP~projects~pwg0-16~conb'act
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the
date first above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR
T & M Construction
8946 Reales St.
Alta Loma, CA 91737
909-466-5988
By:
Tim Early, Owner
DATED:
CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
CONTRACT CA-7 R:~ClP~pmjects~pw00-16~contract
ITEM 9
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OFTEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~-~- )~-~
DIRECTOR OFFINAN~
CITY MANAGER ~
/~.William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
March 6, 2001
Award of Construction Contract for the Margarita Road Widening -
Phase i, Project No. PW99-01
PREPARED BY:
Amer Attar, Senior Engineer
Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Award a contract for the Margarita Road Widening - Phase I, Project No. PW99-01 to
R.J. Noble Company for $1,266,140.80, and authorize the City Manager to execute the
contract.
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $126,614.08, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
Approve an appropriation of $1,650,000.00 from Capital Project Reserves to the Margarita
Road Widening - Phase I Project.
BACKGROUND: On October 10, 2000, the City Council approved the plans and
specifications, and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for
the Margarita Road Widening - Phase I Project. The first phase of Margarita Road widening
consists of widening and improving Margarita Road from Plo Pico Road to Hwy 79 South. This
project will include pavement widening, pavement rehabilitation, construction of curb and gutter,
sidewalks, raised medians, irrigation system, landscaping, signing, striping, driveway
reconstruction, and signal interconnect conduit. Additional pavement rehabilitation for the
southbound lanes on Margarita Road from approximately 700' north of San Fermin to Plo Pico
Road will also be included in this project.
Originally the Margarita Road Widening Project was not scheduled until Fiscal Year 2001-2002.
The project has been accelerated to keep pace with development and to improve traffic flow along
Margarita Road. Also, the existing street surface on Margarita Road is deteriorating rapidly.
In order to accelerate the widening and improvement of Margarita Road it is recommended that
funds be appropriated from Capital Project Reserves in the amount of $1,650,000.00. In addition to
the contract amount the requested appropriation will provide funds for administration, soils and
materials testing, and surveying services.
1
r:~,gdrpt\01\0306~pw99-01 .awdJ
Ten (10) bids were received and publicly opened on February 28, 2001 and results were as follows:
1. R.J. Noble Company ......................................................................... $1,266,140.80
2. Riverside Construction Company ................................................................. $1,343,578.00
3. E.V. Constructors Inc ................................................................................... $1,358,929.10
4. Hillcrest Contracting, lnc .............................................................................. $1,393,983.00
5. Vance Corporation .................................................................................. $1,410,822.00
6. Terra-Cai Construction, Inc .......................................................................... $1,420,393.45
7. Gueno Development Co., Inc ....................................................................... $1,473,386.50
8. All American Asphalt .................................................................................. $1,474,518.50
9. Laird Construction Co., Inc ........................................................................... $1,481,392.50
10. Castello, Inc ................................................................................... $1,611,406.00
The Engineer's estimate for this project is $1,350,000.
Staff has reviewed the bid proposals and found R.J. Noble Company of Orange, California to be the
lowest responsible bidder for this project. Staff has contacted references and determined that R.J.
Noble Company has satisfactorily performed similar type of work for the City in the past.
The specifications allow one hundred seventy (170) working days for completion of this project,
which includes sixty-five (65) working day landscape maintenance period.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
An initial study was prepared for the project which identified no significant impacts to the
environment. Therefore a Negative Declaration has been proposed for the project.
FISCAL IMPACT: Margarita Road Improvements, Phase I, is included in the Capital
Improvement Budget for Fiscat Year 2001-2002. This appropriation is necessary to expedite the
construction of the Margarita Road Improvements - Phase I. Adequate Capital Project Reserves
are available for the requested appropriation. The total construction cost is $1,392,754.88, which
includes the contract amount of $1,266,140.80 plus 10% contingency of $126,614.08.
ATTACHMENT:
1. Project Location
2. Project Description
3. Contract
2
r:~agd rpt\O 1\0306~pw99-01 .awdl
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW99-01
MARGARITA ROAD WIDENING - PHASE I
FROM PlO PICO RD. TO DARTOLO RD.
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 6th day of March, 2001, by and between the City
of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and R.J. Noble
Company hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CiTY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree
as follows:
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract
Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance
Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO.
PW99-01, MARGARITA ROAD WIDENING - PHASE I, FROM PlO PICO RD. TO
DARTOLO RD., Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments
thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications
(1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and
the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including
all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the
Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of
California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General
Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO.
PW99-01, MARGARITA ROAD WIDENING - PHASE I, FROM PlO PICO RD. TO
DARTOLO RD. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the
publisher:
Building New, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials,
and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General
Specifications, Special Provision, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO.
PW99-01, MARGARITA ROAD WIDENING - PHASE I, FROM PlO PICO RD. TO
DARTOLO RD.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract
Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in
lieu of, such conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in
complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed
and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise
CONTRACT CA~O
specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and
incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be
as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other
Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed,
shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable
equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW99-01, MARGARITA ROAD WIDENING . PHASE I
FROM PlO PICO RD. TO DARTOLO RD.
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict
accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract
Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished
and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to
the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHDULE. The CITY agrees to pay, and
CONTRACTORagrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the
sum of: ONE MILLION TWO HUNDRED SIXTY SIX THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED
FORTY DOLLARS and EIGHTY CENTS ($1,266,140.80), the total amount of the base
bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed one hundred
seventy (170) working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by CITY.
The total contract time includes the sixty-five (65} working day landscape
maintenance period. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are
approved by CITY.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except
that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order,
changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as
established by the City Council.
PAYMENTS
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thidy (30) days
after submission of a payment request to the CITY, the CONTRACTOR shall be
paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed
according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or
about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses.
The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be
made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR
CONTRACT CA-1
filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on
forms provided by the CITY.
Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law,
accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work
for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the
terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under
the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be
considered as an acceptance of any part of the work.
Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty
(30) days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract
Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference.
In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code, a reduction in the
retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the
Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project
is more than 50% complete. The Council hereby delegates its authority to
reduce the retention to the Engineer.
WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is
recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty
performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following
schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
$25,000 0 $75,000
RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE
180 days 3%
$75,00- $500,000
180 days
$2,250 + 2% ofamountin
excess of $75,000
Over $500,000
One Year
$10,750 + 1% of amount
in excess of $500,000
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government
Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of
one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed
beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be
deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum
shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR.
CONTRACTOR wilt be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated
damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or
negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is
required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay.
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph
6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as
to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of
the
CONTRACT CA-2
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release
of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required
to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment.
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of
the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per
diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each
craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the
Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City
Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula.
CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the
adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the
provisions of Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each
laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for
any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in
violation of the provisions of the Contract.
TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction
or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR
alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its
officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or
indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the CITY for any
and all costs incurred by the CITY as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project.
The CITY shale deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the
CITY.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents,
or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing
favorable treatment with respect thereto.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee,
or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been
employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, ail firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors
upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against
CONTRACT CA-3
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has
been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge
that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely
performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof,
including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY.
BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part
thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable
times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner
as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and
acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final
inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will
not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion,
national origin, color, sex age, or handicap.
GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor under~tand and agree that the laws of the
State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties
to this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation
concerning this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district
court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation
between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the
Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs
incurred in the litigation.
ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor
is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-
336, as amended.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents,
and to the CITY addressed as follows:
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
CONTRACT CA~
iN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the
date first above written.
DATED:
DATED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
CONTRACTOR:
R.J. Noble Company
15505 E. Lincoln Ave.
Orange, CA 92865
(714) 637-1550
By:
Michael J. Carver, President
CITY OF TEMECULA:
By:
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
CONTRACT CA-5
ITEM 10
ORDINANCE NO. 01-04
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION NO. 2.04.020 OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO TIME AND
PLACE OF MEETINGS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section is hereby amended to read as follows:
"A. Regular meetings for the city council shall be held on the second and fourth
Tuesday of each month. Regular meetings shall commence at 7:00 p.m. for open sessions and
adjourn at eleven p.m., subject to an unanimously adopted by the members present, motion to
extend the meeting. The City Clerk shall, with the assistance of the City Attorney, determine the
commencement time of closed sessions on the basis of the matters to be discussed therein.
Regular meetings shall be conducted at City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
"B. The City Council may by resolution, designate another date, time and location for a
meeting."
Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall
publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall
be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance.
Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this
Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the
Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of March, 2001.
A'FI'EST:
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:Ords/Ords2001/01-04 1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 01-04 was dully introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the 27th day of February, 2001 and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 6th
day of March, 2001, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:Ords/Ords2001/01-04 2
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 27, 2001
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 9:43
P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. President
Comerchero presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
5 DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, and
Stone
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of February 13, 2001.
2 Rancho California Sports Park Desiltation Project - Project No. PW00-01CSD - Chan,q~.
Order with Clubb Grading for additional work
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Authorize the General manager to approve Contract Change Order No. 2 for an
amount of $3,550.00 above the previously approved 10% contingency for the
Rancho California Sports Park Desiltation Project - Project No. PW00-01CSD.
MOTION: Director Comerchero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 2. The
motion was seconded by Director Roberts and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
No additional comments.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
No comments.
Minutes.csd\022701 1
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
No comments.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
No comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 9:45 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, March 6, 2001, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California.
A'FI'EST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, President
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
Minu~s.csd\022701 2
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
FEBRUARY 27, 2001
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 9:45
P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Comemhero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone,
Roberts
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBER: None
Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of February 13, 2001.
MOTION: Agency Member Naggar moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The
motion was seconded by Agency Member Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
No additional comments.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No comments.
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
No comments.
R:'Wlinutes.rda\022701 1
ADJOURNMENT
At 9:46 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, March 6, 2001, in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California.
Ron Rober[s, Chairman
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Agency Secretary
[SEAL]
R:Wlinutes.rda\022701 2
ITEM 11
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~)/2~:~_~
DIRECTOR OF ~
FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
City Manager
Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Mana~
March 6, 2001
Public/Traffic Safety Commission Recommendations Regarding Emergency
Traffic Circulation Plan
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider the recommendations of the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission and direct staff to begin implementation of those
recommendations.
BACKGROUND: Last November, the City Council considered proposals from Councilmember
Pratt, entitled Emergency Traffic Circulation Plan. This plan was referred to the Public/Traffic
Safety Commission at that time.
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission considered this plan as well as related programs
currently underway. The Commission determined that their recommendations should focus on
transit and ridesharing programs. The Commission also appointed a subcommittee of
Commissioners Connerton and Edwards to study this and make recommendations to the full
Commission.
Staff provided the subcommittee with additional information on transit and ridesharing
programs, and the subcommittee made the recommendations that are included in attachment
#1. The Commission considered these recommendations at their meeting of February 22,
2001 and voted 4-0 (Commissioner Katon absent) to approve these recommendations and
forward them to the City Council.
Commission Chair Edwards will make an oral presentation of the Commission's
recommendations. Staff has reviewed these recommendations and recommends them to the
Council as well.
Councilmember Pratt's original proposals are included for your information as attachment #2.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The recommendations will require staff time, which can be absorbed
R.'IOGRADYJ~TRANSIT PLANNINGIPTSC RECOMMENDATIONS RE ETCP, CITY COUNCIl. AGENDA 3-6-01.D0C 1 2/27/01
in existing work programs. Other fiscal impacts of the recommendations are not expected to
be significant.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Public / Traffic Safety Commission recommendations of February 22, 2001
2. Letter of October 10, 2000 from Councilmember Pratt
R.'IOGRADYJiTRANSlT PLANNINGIPTSC RECOMMENDATIONS RE ETCP, CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 3-6-01.D0C2 2/27/01
CITY OF TEMECULA
Ad Hoc Transportation Committee
February 15, 2001
ATTACHMENT 1
RECOMMENDATIONS TO PUBLIC TRAFFIC/SAFETY COMMISSION
1. Augment City ofTemecula website to include comprehensive transportation
information- "Transportation Solutions"
2. Work with CalTrans to acquire additional "Rideshare" information signs for I- 15
on/off ramps within City limits
3. Include "Transportation Element" in upcoming Temecula General Plan revision.
This element would include Rideshare, (including Park 'N' Ride lots), transit
planning, and trail planning which would complement the traffic cimulation
element.
4. Review of General Plan revisions by Temecula Public Traffic/Safety Commission
5. City to continue to address transportation issues through development agreements,
specific plans as well as General Plan revisions/updates
6. Establish name of ad hoc subcommittee as "Temecula Transportation Sub-
committee"
WORK IN PROGRESS
1. City/TVUSD/RTA collaboration to conduct survey at Temecula's high schools to
gather input for a "Smart Shuttle" program. Survey to be drafted by RTA and
conducted by TVUSD. Expected completion date of late March-early April, 2001
2. Coordinate efforts with RTA to provide transportation to County/City of San
Diego
3. Collect information on extending HOV lanes on I-15, north of San Diego
4. Grant applications to State/Federal agencies to fund Temecula Rideshare program
5. Explore conducting survey to assess Rideshare needs in Temecula/Murdeta. Data
collected could be utilized to:
· Update Temecula General Plan Transportation Element
· Restructure current RTA routes throughout the Temecula/Murrieta area
· Conduct city-wide public transportation education program
ATTACHMENT 2
Tuesday, October 10, 2000
City M~nng~r
City Staff
City Council
City ~f Temecula
43174 Basine~ Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Subject Emergency Traffic Circulation Plan (ETCP)
Dear $1mwn, Members of the City Staff and Members of the City Council:
Tkis is a brief sumnm~ of five pa&es of the attached statement I have a printed copies for the
record and for Council and Sta~ ~aew. I have cOlmes for the p~ess for theft review. Citizens may
request a copy from ou~ staff or contact me by emml sampratt(~,nctimes.net and I will attach a copy
on reply.
If the Council wishes the entire report may be read publicly by the City Clerk
Local Temecula Traffic has not and cannot be m tiqatecl throuqh the uss of
professional traffic consultantsl
According to DMV statistics the last 8 months (January, 2000 through August 2000) have
seen the Temecula City vehicular traffic increased by 4,412 registered units. The number
of autos, motomycles and trucks and grow at a rate of 6.86 vehicles per residence
(4412/643 building permits). We now have (August, 2000) 53,423 registered vehicles
(DMV) equivalent to a line of vehicles- bumper to bumper- from Temecula to Santa
Barbara a distance of 150 miles. This is absolutely unacceptable!
The implementation of this ~an - Emergency Traffic Circulation Plan (ETCP) - to 'jump
start' the relief of 'hal-tic congestion, and in addition provide the Planning Department with a
"breather" to have a more equitable and orcledy review of Specific Plans for the citizen as
well as the developer.
THE COUNCIL MUST IMPLEMENT AN EMERGENCY TRAFFIC/CIRCULATION
SOLUTION THAT WILL CONSERVE OPEN SPACE AND REDUCE TRAFFIC
CONGESTION - NOT A DEFENCE OF POLICIES THAT HAVE MADE TEMECULA THE
"RESIDENTIAL DESTINATION" OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTYI
There are 19 detailed points to the ET'CP. A "pause" for preparation is supported by
California code Section 65858 (a).
Sam Pratt
7697
~ Ho. 650
ALBERT S. PRATT
Since 1919
40470 Brixton Cove
Temecula, CA 92591
(Emil: sampratt~cro.com)
(909)699-8689
Tuesday, October 10, 2000
Shawn Nelson
City Manager
City Staff
City Council
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecuta, CA 92590
Subject: Emergency Traffic Circulation Plan (ETCP) - (Attached are two timely exhibits: Los
· '~Aogeles Times article, October 6; 2000, and a Traffic StagnatJon Solution presentation I made
on October 13, 1999, from a field traffic count, at the comer of Winchester Road (SR79N) and
Margarita Road - The Mall)
Dear Shawn, Members of the City Staff and Members of the City Council:
The following statements address a solution to a major traffic emergency for our City, the
developers and the ci!izens. I have a printed Statement for the record and for your review. I
have copies for the press for their review. Citizens may request a copy from our staff or contact
me by email ~m~es. net and I will attsOn a copy on reply.
Temecula and Murrieta are one community with two governments. Together we are the
dominant citizen group in the Temecula Valley. The ETCP will not be succes~ul without
Murdeta's citizen involvement. Temecula must, initially, lead the way!
According to DMV statistics the last 8 months (January, 2000 through August 2000) have seen
the Temecula City vehicular traffic increased by 4,412 registered units. The number of autos,
motorcycles and tracks and grows at a rate of 6.86 vehicles per residence (4412/643 building
permits). We now have (August, 2000) 53,423 registered vehicles (DMV) equivalent to a line of
vehicles - bumper to bumper-from Temecula to Santa Barbara a distance of 150 miles. This is
absolutely unacceptable! it also gives me the opportunity to voice my concerns over
Traffic/circulation as it affects the effectiveness of the GMP, and the health, safety and welfare
of our cltizeos, (not n--eg~tiabie) r.a/nich'ihdude$ preschool plus K:12 children/adults and retirees.
htt p://vwwv, ci.tem ecula.ca, us/homepaRe/Growt h Mqmt/action Plan.bt m )
Local Temecula Traffic has not and cannot be mitiflated through the use of professional traffic
consultants! (An EIR -Environmental Impact Report - challenge to a laaffic mitigation plan f~ut
based on the cumulative traffic of the City of Temecula may make public funding of public works
improvements impesslble without legislative action or court rulings. An EIR legislated to protect
the citizens has been diluted through the courts - it must, again, be a document for the citizen
and their environment).
The issuance of fourteen (14) new alcoholic beverage liceoses this year, 2000, is not good
health, safety and welfare news for traffic congestion of the citizen.
ALBERT S. PRATT
Since 1919
40470 Brixton Cove
Temecula, CA 92591
(Email: sampratt~cro.com)
(909)699-8689
Civil r~ _~,in ~ No. 7697
~ F~r No. 650
In pursuing sales tax revenue through vehicle sales we have degraded Temecula's environment
through vehicle sales. Is Temecula in a position where only more sales tax revenue will allow it
to survive?
We no longer have the luxury of five year plans to mitigate traffic with the possibility of 15,000
more new cam in Temecuta. Little intemal traffic circulation is physically possible east of 1-15!
Should the present rate of vehicle sales continue we would have over 100,000 vehicles at some
point on cur present streets!
We have nowa growing harl~c circ.~lation emergency affecting the citizen's safety and the
success of the GMP. Citizen's peroeption of traffic congestion fuels their demand for reduced
residential density in addition to their desire for open space. Physical construction - additional
structure widening, bridges, ramps and other future plans will not only be too little to late, but too
expensive. The available funding, for major newtraffic mitigating construction should be used
for other community demands. (City of Temecula Web Site - http://www, d.temecuta, ca. us/)
The uncertainties of this growing problem have directly affected every person's health, safety
and~,Jf~-re.-Th-m=fe-major-residential development projects pending approval have grown into
uncertainties for the developer with the citizen perception that reduced residential density will
cure the i~ai'~;c congestion of Temecula. It will certainly help, but is not the solution - we are!
The concept of constructing the Westem Bypass to relieve industrial h ai'Gc to the west (now over
10 years from initial planning) is an urgent immediate need if our western industrial area is to
avoid gddlock (and, of course, further expansion. Costly north and south interchanges are too far
in the future to relieve b ~fGc congestion, past correspendence outlines my support of the CIP -
Capital Improvement Report - for vadous infrastructure improvements planned east of 1-15 as
well as the Western Bypass, but not $200 million + to support work week transient traffic west of
1-15.
The Council and Staff have been informed of my opposition to the First Street Bridge as not
being cost effective, it is also a dangerous life threat using a residential area access for the
traffic relief of transient workers and paid for by the citizens.
It is my intention to agendize by October 24, 2000, the Emergency Traffic Circulation Plan
(ETCP) concept with imm~M~%ateimpternentatien-of-those~artsof the plan in which resources are
made available. Other creative solutions, minimizin~l capital expanditures, to further enhance
and expedite this plan are welcome from Council, Staff and our citizens:
1. Dudng the five day work week (holidays excluded) a motorized officer will be positioned
dudng the afternoon rush hours (3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.) at the following intersections:
Rancho California Road at Diaz, Jefferson, Ynez and Margarita. Highway 79S at
Margarita, Pala Road and the intersection with 1-15. Winchester Road (SR79N) at
Margarita, Ynez and Jefferson. This will require 10 motorized officers to monitor the
possibility of sedous traffic accidents due to congestion, and allow no trucks over 10,000
LI~. GVW.
2. Added speed limit signs shall be posted not less than 1 per each direction and at the
intersections, between signed or signaled intersections and all arterials. Beloweach
ALBERT S. PRATT
Since/919
40470 Brixton Cove
Temecula, CA 92591
(Email: sampratt~cro.com)
(909) 699-8689
Civil ~L21~e~ No. 7697
Smsca~al ~oi~er No. 650
11.
speed limit sign shall be a small sign stating, "Obey the Law" or "Save a life=, etc. (our
school children wilt have creative ideas). On the street surfaco in each direction
between the posted speed limit signs will be painted the speed limit.
3. Permanent Radar Speed Trailers will be permanently repesitioned at intervals on our
main city arterials, and random positioning on demand on secondary arterials (Example:
Calle Medusa, Via Cordoba)
4. Levy a City of Temecula traffic fine bail increase at the time of the hearing of the moving
violation before the judge of $50.00, in addition to the existing traffic fines. This revenue
to off set the funds made available from other public funding sources, now being
pursued by-Staff, and an immediate revenue return to support the ETCP as well as a
strong deterrent to the running of red lights, stop signs, speeding, reckless
endangerment, etc.
- --5. An incentive program for ~school moms" and citizens shadng the dde dudng "bell hours"
and the morning and afternoon hours of traffic congestion dudng the five-day work woek.
6. A continuing t~ai~fic education program negotiated by Staff, in conjunction with the Traffic
Commission, with the TVUSD, hosted by a uniformed ,e~cor, our Temecula shuttle bus
manager, and a representative of the RTA will be aske~ a~ppear, at each school, each
semester, in the City of Temecuta Grades K through 12':-The purpose will be to educate
prospective and teen-age ddvers with the purpose that this program will '~cide up" to
their families.
7. This program will, at a minimum, stress the value of dde sharing at all times locally to
minimize traffic congestion, safety (less vehicles in the city), respect for .speed limits,
improve traffic circutation and, in my opinion, citizen participation in the program is the
only possible present and future mitigation to allow new residential constnJction under
the GMP. I consider the implementation of this '1.~ al'ftc education" concept the backbone
of our i~ai'iqc mitigation future and the effective execution of our GMP.
8, Implement a policy of no on street parking between the hours of 2:00 a,m. and 6:00 a.m.
dudng the 5-day workweek with holidays excepted.
9. Amend our General Plan to restrict garages for new residences attached or otherwise to
a maximum of a two-car garage, This will be a further deterrent to traffic congestion.
10. Special analysis of the reduced morning and afternoon traffic from busing all high school
students, and eliminating high school student personal ddving.
promote the safety and convenience of our shuffle bus servico together with 'rVUSD
buses to further minimize the additional morning and afternoon school tiaffic now
generated by mothers ddving their children to school and return by augmenting~hei~__
school bus transportation at the ~bell hours".
TVUSD educates our children we must work with them to develop ~safe walking routes"
on an intedm emergency and permanent basis, including Stop signed and signaled
intersections if required for safety of our children. An initial allocation of $100,000 by the
City Council to "jump start" this program. This is a small amount to save a life and to
support our GMP.
. 13. We have authodzeq hundreds of thousands of dollars of feasibility and design studies for
' recreetioo and cultural projects. With our present and growing traffic crisis are we using
good judgment in proceeding until our citizens are well advised of the impact on their
environment? At this stage in Temecula's development any project, recreational,
cultural, industrial and commercial will exacerbate the danger to the citizen - should we
proceed with a librery, opera house, children's museum - can we get to them safely?.
ALBERT S. PRATT
Since 1919
40470 Brixton Cove
Temecula, CA 92591
(Email' sampra~c~o.com)
(909) 699-8689
Cal~',~ia Re~r~im:
Civil F~ ~alm~x iqo. 7697
~ ~ ~o. 6~
T~y's ~c may make them a ~g~ to vi~t. We r~y ap~v~ n~fly ~,~
f~ a f~lity ~y for a ~ ~ T~c ~ng~ion a~ ~ety is ~inly a high~
14. This initial all~ ~ $1~,~ is to ~ foll~ by ~an~ fu~ing ~h gm.s,
n~ Dl~s and an a~n t~ ~ ~ f~ ev~ new vehicle ~ld in Tem~la, and ~ the
~ ~e ~ v~ide ~1~ is n~Hy ~,~,~ (20 n~ ~). U~ ~ ~v~e
f~ino ~u~ ~ll ~ mand~ f~ ~inuing ~ive t~c ~wl - ~ I~ f~ a
~on of ~e fu~. My ~o~1 ~ine~ng effoRs t~ ~v~e funding have
g~ hubris ~ le~em ~th ~ae age~ and the a~ol~mleum ind.. This
i~on is ~aila~e to our dty to a~ in ~ing n~ em ~v~e ~R~on
f~i~ ~.
15. We h~e to im~em~ the r~uirem~ for ~o~a~e h~. One of the m~y
~ems is the ~n~m over the q~li~ of the ~n ~ the ~omic level to q~lify
~ ~me our neigh~r. This m~ ~ ~ a ~n~m as ~ all h~e the ~lity in
~ life tim~ to r~uim ~ic a~an~. ~ this make us any I~ ~ an exem~a~
d~z~?
16. In addition to ~e ~ann~ affo~a~e n~ hou~ng e~ing hou~ng ~ming on the manet
...... ~h re~ons-~.other-~mic ~er or-develo~r ~tu~ions th~ the dty
~a~ a~ refu~, if n~, ~ hou~ in the many dty n~gh~s ~ey
~me availaMe a~ ~a~ on the ~e ho~ng manet ~th eve~ ~odty to ~is
in ne~. This ~11 dive.fy ~o~aMe h~ng ~gho~ our fine
17. Am~ ~e Ci~ ~e to ~ng the high~ ~a~s of the C~R's as a fu~h~ involve
to dfizens ~d~ion in the ~ d~l~on i~e. HOA's ~n volu~e~ monitoring
in ~ion ~th ~e E~o~m~.
18. ~fizen ~on of the ~u~l a~ ~ is th~ they mu~ fight for ~eir Hghts. This
~ n~ make the dtize~ "hap~ ~m~ to unde~and and ~e in
~al ~mms. We have g~ di~e~ ~th our City Governing. A
~1 and St~ ~inuing ~mm ~ finds ~ys a~ m~ to ~y dtiz~'s
fi~s is to ~ f~ u~ all ~la~e dry re~u~ - including Ci~ Aflomey I~
o~nions to e~au~ all mm~i~ ~ the i~s of develo~ ~ oth~ s~al
im~ gmu~ are addr~. This ~i~ ~il give all s~al inte~ gmu~ th~
is ~ f~ the dtiz~ is ~ is ~ for ~e Cit~.
19. We mu~ "Ma~" our ~an to the dtiz~ - they am the ~l~oni
The im~em~ of this ~an - Em~y T~c Ci~lation Plan (~CP) - to ~jump
~' ~e reli~ of ~a;~c ~ng~ion, a~ in ~ition ~vide the Planning De~m~ ~ a
"~e~ to have a mom ~uita~e a~ o~y revi~
~1 ~ the dev~o~r. O~inan~s ev~ ~lot m~r~ may ~ ~uir~ to h~e a t~al
eff~ve e~o~e ~an. The r~uir~ em~cy mea~ms ~11 ~ ex~ ~er
~1 ap~val of the ~CP.
By ~e Novem~r 28, 2~ -
r~ia~ vehicle on Tem~la's ~s ~ an ap~xim~e t~l ~ ~23 ex~i~ our
t~al ~l~ion. This is truly an em~i
ALBERT S. PRATT
Since 1919
40470 Brixton Cove
Temecula, CA 92591
(Email: sampratt~cro.com)
(909) 6994689
Civil ~gi-,~-x lqo. 7697
Smmu~ g,~ ?~.~ bio. 650
The proposed 'pause" is supported by California Lav~. California Code, Section 65858 (a): "-
- - the legislative body, to protect the public safety, health and weifare, may adopt as an
urgency measure an interim ordinance prohibiting any uses which may be in conflict with a
contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal which the legislative body,
planning commission or the planning department is considering or studying or intends to
study within a reasonable time."
1. I am requesting the above 19 suggestions be placed on the October 24, 2000
.... Q, ou_nci~l_agend_a_tg_allowtime for the Council and Staff to review FROM October 10,
2. If this emergency plans, with welcome upgrades, is approved by the Council. Staff
will complete their review and provide an amendment to the Growth Management
_Plan for Council approvalonthe November 14, 2000 agenda. (Growth Management
Action Plan, Section 4. Traffic Circulation System Improvements)
3. Staff - will prepare a detailed plan of executing the emergency plan, including
--named Staff personnel responsibie for-emergency implementation of the approved
plan for Council approval on November 28, 2000. "GOI' is 49 days after October
...... 10; 2000. Hardly a deterrent to the issuing of approved new building permits and
und~y-resldential construction.
THE COUNCIL MUST RESOLVE CITIZEN DISCONTENT WITH AN EMERGENCY
TRAFFIC/CIRCULATION SOLUTION - WITH CITIZEN PARTICIPATION - THAT VVILL
CONSERVE OPEN SPACE (Councilman Sam Pratt, "Perspectives, October, 2000),
http://www, ci.temecula.ca.us/citvhall/mayor cc/pratt/perspectives, btm AND REDUCE TRAFFIC
CONGESTION - NOT A DEFENCE OF POLICIES THAT HAVE ALREADY MADE TEMECULA
THE URESIDENTIAL DESTINATION" OF SOUTHVVEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY! (Mayor Pro
Tem Jeff Comerchero, ~Perspectives", October, 2000)
http://wvwv, ci.temecuta.ca.us/cityhall/ma¥or cc/cemerchero/pempectives, htm-
TEMECULA/MURRIETA AND THE VALLEY IS 'VVHERE IT'S AT!'
Respectfully, Sam Pratt
Tougher
f :ofcarpoois,
I ttemative t ran~ t sources.
it g no rite, s [o d~vers on the
[ That te~ib/e
The average e~a~l to ~o~< on
Southland k~'a~ eXmnded to
,~ minu~ m aery compile~ fig.
t~n for the ~ev{o~
iv~ home, a 414~u~
qm~ an extra fo~ m~nu~
:f~tr,?ion ~ag
, . ~ys and s~ace
~er~ 1.8 n~llloa a day across
nOuthern California, fibre to
keep pian~ ~, ~le~s t~t
Cials can ,~, X ,.~.
~i~ ca~a~s, bu~s aaa oth~
ae ~u~aern Caafo~ia As~. ~f
The regon e~
Pm~ple ~n the ~xt two
the eq{t~valent of
~o~ ~a~ 7a~ of
of t~ COmmute ~,
of 2,¢25 drivers in ~x
a Trer.-ek Survey finds
Southland motorists face:'
longer da/l¥ commutes.
llie repo~tpmmotes use-~
ranked among the Jeast--h'~aent
po~ed hig,'ler levels of ¢lils~ti~.
pie in ~s Angeles County, the
e~gefl that dissatisfaction ]evels
.,night be t~ dc,~e ~<> call b~t ~ted
that Or~e Co~mty hi~rJ~liy
~ ~nk~ ~ m d~v~r ~ppMe~.
~eaiiy a re~on~) pfob]em,_ she
~d~.
,' ..:. .: .::
........... mom
~1 Collier, ~AG:~
ity '¢e~e~es. "They make 'it
.to ~ee," ~{oore said. '*If YoU're
mga Toyo~ ~v~a, y~ f~
~ou co~d ~ c~ like a bug';
Stress ~ e~enced "fa~ly
often" or %'e~ often" among
': Jammed freeways and snHace T
~tte~? ~te ~ining he
~o cuings and
I PilY t~ man who ~s to d~ve in ea~ so'ne p~ple ~ m~e or
al, ay," ~d ~ gngel~s_attorneB Four Of every l0 res~dent$
~iliiam'M~re, WM~ s~enda more ~d ch~ jobs m ~e h~t
~tm an hour a day on the ft~.. ~yea~
: J.~Y~d oiten-mor~=than two ab
, ..., . .' ., .:: 0~,20 ' ';'~--' -~0 ,.
~ s just a~ g~ ng from the V~.dc.,?. 23
,~. · , : ..... .:~:,~:, .:,.': ~ ::: 8~,. :,
' ~,..~.:::.:: ~ , ' :; ' . -SIO~ his ~y'~om ~i~'~t~ : ~ ' ' : '
~.~+w~o~aoleteavoidth~ 'M~ ~. -. -. . - '-' - -'~----~ - -: ,
-+, , g gele~ sa d ~s o~ dnv
~t . .. ehas a{ : ..
~ ~, ~ ~II mm d~t ~, - , · · : ·
· ~c ," · - m~ (~s~ o~r ~at ~ ',. ~e ~ he ~t~ ~mg the dza-
: ~n wo~ He h~ ...... ' . g a~e co~ n~ies
:~,~, .... . . men .m~ ~:~i~ ~u~f 'mOndlaneo~{fiellO~ ~t even ,~ ...... ~ '
- ~.~ ~?~.,uu~g c~gestmn.~hfle ~ ~g~n~mv *~--; '- '-' ~Rhe~-~*~t2-~ ~2_._ .~ ~, ~z:uu~u m- averse travel
~e~ a *-~-~-' ..... ~ ........ v, u~ ~ ot ~ ,.~ a,u.~, z~ av~ [~
, . e . ~,aurc~c~t,rom '~efaH~- ~ --, ' ;-~' · t~-. .. _ , ~ P ~tes,
. ~. _~. : mou~ ~ ~ng b~ strike. .. . dt~t route - ·
w:~a~ttoM*off~sin~h~ , Evenbefore~e~ke con~es "~o~ketheHar~. ~ ~,, v~tur~commmers, fi~e.th~e
: ~ ' , e .~. ~.......y ,~y m Rlvermde ~unty, registered
~;T~ ~et~p ~:~e I01 t~ ?~ ~at f~ years. No~,'he Said ' ~, he ~ia,.':It'a bz m~r ~
~ay.~ ~a~eiy h~f an ho~ a~ ' · · - '
B~n, bM. ~ minutes dudug the ~v~a{ ~s, it ~ as bad as it's , Not ev~ ~ C~er~e~es ~
' T~e~mefrom C~a~ns McrettJ:~ ~ve has gone from v~t~aCo~ty~f~ex~d,~w
on a ~day at 5:30 can ~ g~. '
Civil ~,gi~e~ No. 7697
Six.rural Fm~in~ No, 650
ALBERT S. PRATT
"Since 1919"
40470 Brixton Cove
Temecula, CA 92591
(Email: ~mpratt(i~nctimes.net)
(909) 699-8689
October, 13, 1999
TRAFFIC STAGNATION
PEOPLE POWER !
"RIDE SHARING"
TRAFFIC COUNT WINCHESTER ROAD:
(Frequent) 15 CARS - ONE (1) PASENGER PER CAR (100%)
"TYPICAL" daily traffic pattern on Winchester Road~ Ynez Road~ Rancho
, and ~ Road.
12 CARS - 9 WITH (1) PASSENGER - $ WITH (2) PASSENGERS (80%)
6 CARS WITH (2) PASSENGERS PER CAR - 1 CAR W1TH (3) PASSENGERS
PER CAR (47%)
: SHARING" THE ULTIMATE "RmE
(Save $5000 per year per car - ACSC $6000/Yr)
ALL OF THE ABOVE 15 PASSENGERS (RTA Busses Temecula~ CAN RIDE THE
BUS O,ESS THAN 1%/car)