Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout032701 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting wilt enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE MARCH 27, 200'1 - 7:00 P.M. At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. 6:00 P.M. - Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to Government Code Sections: 1. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Governmen~ Code Section 54956.9(b)(1) with respect to one matter of potential litigation. With respect to such matters, the City Attorney has determined that a point has been reached where there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City based on existing facts and circumstances and the City will decide whether to initiate litigation. Public Information concerning e~(isting litigation between the City and various parties may be acquired by reviewing the public documents held by the City Clerk, CALL TO ORDER: · Prelude Music: Invocation: Flag Salute: ROLL CALL: Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 2001-05 Resolution: No. 2001-21 Mayor Jeff Comerchero Eve Craig Pastor Gary Nelson of Calvary Chapel of Temecula Mayor Pro Tem Roberts Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone, Comerchero PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Supervisor Bob Buster reqardinq Homeless Shelters PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on R:~genda\032701 1 an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter no~t listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. 2 3 When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of January 9, 2001; 2.2 Approve the minutes of the January 16, 2001, RClP Workshop. Resolution Approvinq List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A R:~Agenda\032701 2 4 5 6 7 Professional Services Agreement - Diaz Road Extension and Aliqnment Study - Proiect No. PW00-10 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve the agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to provide professional engineering services for the Alignment Study for the extension of Diaz Road to the City limits and a bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek - Project No. PW00-10 - for an amount not to exceed $167,101.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement; 4.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve amendments not to exceed the contingency amount of 10% of the contract or $16,710.10. SB 332 Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Abatement Funding Request RECOMMENDATIQN: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 0l- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING ANY ANNUAL SUBMITTAL OF A FUNDING REQUEST FOR A SB 332 BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING AND LITTER ABATEMENT GRANT Tract No. 23209 - Subdivision Aqreement (located at the easterly extension of La Serena Way at Butterfield Staqe Road) RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve the Subdivision Agreement and accept the Performance Bond security to guarantee the performance of the SUBDIVIDER under this agreement. Completion and Acceptance for Overland Drive Overcrossinq at Interstate Route 15 - Proiect No. PW95-11 RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Accept the Overland Drive Ovemrossing Project at Interstate Route 15- Project No. PW95-11 as complete; 7.2 File a Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; 7.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven months after filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. R:~Agenda\032701 3 RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY R:~Agenda\032701 4 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 2001-01 Resolution: No. CSD 2001-06 CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Stone ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item no.~t on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR Award of Construction Contract for the Rancho California Sports Park Culvert Modification Proiect - Proiect No. PW00-23CSD RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Award a contract for the Rancho California Sports Park Culvert Modification Project - Project No. PW00-23CSD to KEC Engineering for $59,750.00 and authorize the President to execute the contract; 1.2 Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $5,975.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount; 1.3 Approve an appropriation of $25,000.00 from Development Impact Fees - Park and Recreation for the Rancho California Sports Park Culvert Modification Project. R:~,genda\032701 5 DEPARTMENTAL REPORT DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, April 10, 2001, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\032701 6 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. RDA 2001-01 Resolution: No. RDA 2001-02 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ron Roberts ROLL CALL AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Lease of Aqency Property - 27500 Jefferson Avenue RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve a two-year lease agreement with the Donna Reeves Trust UTD 7-25-90 for Agency property located at 27500 Jefferson Avenue. R:~Agenda\032701 7 DEPARTMENTAL REPORT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, April 10, 2001, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\032701 8 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL BUSINESS 8 Morqan Hill Specific Plan No. 313 RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Formally adopt the attached recommended Condition of Approval for the Morgan Hill Specific Plan traffic mitigation measure for presentation to the Riverside County Board of Supervisors; 8.2 Endorse the creation of an Urban Limit Line within the unincorporated territory of Riverside County east of the Morgan Hill Specific Plan and direct staff to prepare a map of said line for approval by the Council and subsequent submittal to the County Board of Supervisors. 9 Rules of Order for Conduct of City Council Meetinqs (At the request of Councilman Naggar) RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Provide direction to staff whether to amend Resolution No. 94-79 regarding rules of order for conduct at City Council Meetings. 10 Public/Traffic Safety Commission Meetinq Schedule Revision RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Approve modification of the PublicFFraffic Safety Commission meeting schedule to one regular meeting per month. 10.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE MEETING SCHEDULE OF THE PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION 10.3 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 01- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION NO. 2.40.100 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO MONTHLY COMPENSATION FOR CITY COMMISSIONERS R:~Agenda\032701 9 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, April 10, 2001, at 7:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, TemecuJa, California. R:~Agenda\032701 10 PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS Back-up material for presentation by Supervisor Bob Buster 7 'J MINU'FES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF'RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 3.3___!2 On motion of Supervisor Mullen, seconded by Supervisor Wilson and duly carried by unanimous vote, IT WAS ORDERED that the Department of Public Social Services Report regarding Programs for the Homeless in Riverside County, is continued to Tuesday, Februa~ 27, 2001. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a full true, and correct copy of an order made and entered on January 30, 2001 of Supervisors Minutes. xc: DP$S, C\Ox,B WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Board of Supervisors Dated: January 30, 2001 Gerald A. Maloney, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, in and for the County ofl~)iv~'de, State of Califurnia. By:__ , /~...'~~ Deputy AGENDA NO. 3.32 3.3 Riverside County Department' of Public Social Services Report to the Board of Supervisors February 27, 2001 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On December 18, 2000, your Honorable Board of Supervisors held a Homeless Summit, during which the Department of Public Social Services presented a report on the status of homeless programs and services throughout Riverside County and provided several recommendations to further the development of additional services. Also during the Summit, your Board received testimony from numerous service providers, homeless advocates and interested par~ies regarding issues having a direct impact on the homeless. At the conclusion of the Summit, DPSS was directed to provide a follow-up report to address the following: · A comprehensive plan for addressing gaps in service, including timelines Efforts to engage cj~ies thrpughout the county in a regional approach to address homeless'issues, including the development of a model agreement to define roles and responsibilities for the planning and implementation of homeless programs and services The cost of transitional services Services available to foster care children who age-out of the system In addition to these issues, this report provides an update on HUD's recommendations related to the 2000 Consolidated Application, which fails to provide additional funding to support critical new services within the Continuum of Care. There have also been several recent developments with cities and service providers that are worth noting.'" DPSS has also provided a brief description of other departmental programs and services that support the homeless. As a result of these actions, the Department has developed several additional recommendations, which are summarized below: RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Board of Supervisors: 1. Authorize the Department to seek input from the FEMA Local Board, current service providers, and various local governments and community homeless advocates regarding the following recommendations: A. Until sufficient transitional shelter beds for the general homeless population are available, emergency shelter providers should be encouraged to: · Expand shelter services from 30 days to 60 days. · Provide case management services to assist residents in the · development of a plan towards self-sufficiency. Require residents to comply with the plan to remain at the shelter. · Coordinate with other, service organizations whenever possible to .provide additional services to residents. · Receive additional funding consideration if continuing case management services are provided after a resident progresses to permanent housing. B. These requirements should be incorporated into the Request for · Proposals and.:the Local Emergency Shelter Strategy which are utilized for the disbursement of Emergency Food and Shelter Program funding and Emergency Housing Assistance Program funding, respectively, 2. Authorize the chairman to send a letter to HUD expressing the County's dissatisfaction with this year's allocation, emph;~sizing the impact to critical new homeless programs. 3. Adopt the following legislative positions: A. Aggressively seek additional HUD funding in support of new transitional and permanent housing projects. B. Support legislation that provides funding for the construction and operation of new homeless shelters,, with special emphasis on regional effods to address homelessness. C. Explore legislation that would: · Extend AFDC-FC (foster care funding) eligibility while a young person is actively participating in ILSP up to age 21. · Authorize this funding to be used for housing, education, training and the development of transitional housing programs with supportive services. 4. Direct the County's state and federal legislative representatives to further the Board's positions. 5. Direct the County's federal legislative representative to schedule meetings with HUD officials during the annual trip to Washington, D.C. Authorize DPSS, in coordination with other counties, to work with the State CWS/CMS system officials to develop an automated system to track former foster children to allow greater outreach and access to the services provided by ILSP. COMPREHENSIVE COUNTY PLAN AND TIMELINES In the initial report to your Board, DPSS identified several gaps in services with regard to the availability of emergency, transitional and permanent housing as well as various supportive services that are needed to assist an individual from homelessness to self-sufficiency. To address these needs comprehensively, DPSS has identified several issues, developed an action plan and identified partners to ensure that these gaps are addressed collectively, cooperatively and as timely as possible. Short-Term Plans Currently, there are several projects in various stages of completion, which are identified in the charts that follow. Some of these projects will be completed in the near future, ther'eby expanding available services. DPSS intends to work closely with the service providers, impacted communities and local jurisdictions to ensure the smooth completion of these projects. While these projects will begin to address some of the cu.rrent gaps in services, until there are adequate shelter beds available, other measures should be considered. Emergency shelters are intended to be short term, and to provide a safety net with limited services until a bed at a transitional shelter is available. Currently in Riverside County, many emergency shelters allow residents to stay for a 30-day period, ideally, an individual then progresses to a transitional shelter, where they can stay up to 24-months and receive a variety of supportive services including life and job skills training, money management, psychological and substance abuse counseling and case management services. Due to a lack of available transitional shelter beds for the general homeless population, it is recommended that additional suppbrtive services be provided at emergency shelters and that the length of stay at the shelter be extended until this gap in services is addressed. RECOMMENDATIONS: The Department requests approval to seek input from the FEMA Local Board, current service providers, and' various local governments and community homeless advocates regarding the following recommendations: 1. Until sufficient transitional shelter beds for the general homeless population are available, emergency shelter providers should be encouraged to: A. Expand shelter services from 30 days to 60 days. B. Provide case management services to assist residents in the development of a plan towards self-sufficiency. N ' T C. Require residents to comply with the plan to remain at the shelter. D. Coordinate with other service organizations ,~,henever possible to provide additional services to residents. E. Receive additional funding consideration if continuing case management services are provided after a resident progresses to permanent housing. Incorporate these requirements into the Request for Proposals and the Local Emergency Shelter Strategy which are utilized for the disbursement of ~mergency Food and Shelter Program funding, Emergency Shelter Grant and Emergency Housing Assistance Program funding, respectively. In addition, the Department will continue to make available other services such as, CalWORKs, Food Stamps, and Medi-Cal to eligible clients; and will coordinate with the Department of Mental Health's Homeless Intervention Team to ensure the availal~ilify'of necess.ary mental health care. Transportation systems are needed to get homeless shelter residents to out-of- shelter supportive services and to get children to and from school and daycare. A proposal for such services was included in the HUD 2000 Consolidated Application, however, as is discussed later in this report, HUD did not allocate funding for this project. The Department will continue to seek opportunities for funding this service. Long-Term Plans To address those gaps in services where projects have yet to be developed, the Department intends tO take the following steps: 1. Identify and initiate communications with impacted communities to encourage a collaborative response to ad,dress the need for services. 2. Identify and secure funding for services. 3. Identify and secure appropriate sites for services. 4. Identify a service provider, if one hasn't already been identified. With regard to engaging local jurisdictions, the Department has met with the Executive Director for the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) and is scheduled to meet with the WRCOG Technical Advisory Committee on March 22, 2001. At this meeting, the Department will share the identified gaps in services by region and seek cooperation from WRCOG and member cities to begin to address these gaps. A draft "Letter of Participation," which is included as Attachment D, will also be shared with WRCOG with the intent of having this letter finalized with the input of the cities. The Department has also developed an introductory letter, which will be sent to specific cities where gaps in services have been identitied, to further engage them in this process. With regard to funding, the availability of local resources are recognized as limited, which is why most projects to date have been largely funded with Federal, State and privately raised revenues. Most state and federal funding sources are restricted to a type of shelter service. For example, HUD funding is available for transitional shelters and permanent housing for disabled populations, but cannot be used for emergency shelters. With regard to emergency shelters, there are Community Development Block Grants. Emergency Housing Assistance Program funds and Emergency Shelter Grants· In each case, the requests for funding far exceed the amount of funding available. In recognition that additional funding is needed to ensure that these gaps in services are addressed, the Department recommends that the County, in cooperation with cities, service providers and homeless advocates, pursue additional State and Federal funding. This legislative proposal is described in greater detail later in this report. Once the local jurisdiction has endorsed a project and funding has been secured, the planning review and construction process is estimated to take from 18 to 24- months to complete:~ This time can be reduced if the local jurisdiction is able to "fast-track" the permit 'process, and may be reduced if the project involves rehabilitation of an existing buildiqg instead of new construction. Following are the projects, by shelter type, that the Department will be pursuing: Those projects for which funding has been received, or for which the local jurisdiction has provided support are in italics. EMERGENCY SHELTERS LOCATION # OF. BEDS : PROJECT STATUS River'side Women and F~lnding Secured; Selection of Contractor in progress; Children's Sheitor 55 Pursuing Conditional Use Permit. Site Identified; City And Non-Profit Organization Blythe/Ripley 30-50 ApDlyin~ For EH, AP Capital Grant Lake El$inore 30-50 Status: Seeking] Local Jurisdiction Support Bannin!]/Beaur'n0nt 30-50 Status: Seeking Local Jurisdiction Support Temecula/Murrieta 30-50 Status: Seekin,q Local Jurisdiction Suppprt TRANSITONAL SHELTERS At the Homeless Summit, your Board requested information regarding the cost of transitional housing, which has been included in this report as Attachment A. As indicated in the initial report, most current transitional shelters serve specialized populations_ In order to maximize access to services, it is recommended that new transitional sheJters serve the general homeless population, which can also serve many of the specialized populations. Three transitional shelters for specialized populations are already in the planning and/or construction phases and are listed first based on their status. Beyond those projects, priorities are set to maximize the number of persons to be served in the shortest time period. Because of the number of persons impacted, the Department recommends that priority be given to projects at March Air Reserve Sase. LOCA'~ION # OF BEDS PROJECT STATUS City of Riverside - Funding secJ~d. Constructian/Rel~ab in Transitional Shelter for process; Anticipated completion by end of Pregnant/Post Partum 5'4 2001. Young Women w/Substance Ab~se (MFI) Western Riverside County at Site ApproVal granted in December 2000; M.A.R.B. for Veterans (U. S. 50 Environmental Asses.sment to be completed by Vets) Mamh 2001; Construction/Rahab to begin in 2001; Anticipate completion by early 2002 Western 'Riverside County at M.A.R.B. 120 beds for Availability of site pending lawsuit. Grant (Luth.e{an Social Services) . families application will be made Spring 2001. Western Coachella Valley.;-. Status: Seeking Service Provider and [Need Service Pro¥id..er~) ,100-120 Jurisc~iction Support 1-15 Corridor (Temecula, Status: Seeking Local"~Jurisdiction Support Murrieta~ ~.ake Elsinore) .... 70-130 . Blythe 60-100 Status: Seeking Local Jurisdiction Suppor~ Banning/Beaumont 60-:100 Statusl Seeking Local Jurisdiction Support Western Riverside County 80-100 beds Status: Seeking Local Jurisdiction Support for indivi,.duals SAFE HAVENS As indicated in the initial report, Safe Havens are shelters for the severely mentally ill who are not yet willing to accept treatment. The purpose of a safe haven is to give those severely mentally ill persons a place to stay indefinitely, under the minimal supervision of a mental health professional. The intent is for the mental health professional to develop a trustful relationship with the homeless persons, and, through that trust, get them into a program that will help them to get well and allow them to live a self-sufficient life style. Safe Havens need to be located close to services and transportation, and should not house more than 20 persons at a time. There arc currently no safe havens in Riverside County. Funding has been received three times for safe havens. On one occasion, the funding had to be returned to HUD because there were no communities willing to site a safe haven in their jurisdiction. The second time, the grant was turned into a permanent housing program for the mentally ill. While this provide homeless persons with housing, it does not provide the constant availability to a mental health professional that is needed by these clients. The third project is pending, and will most likely be changed to a permanent housing program because of our inability to find a location for an actual safe haven setting. It is our plan to put one safe haven in each of the Department of Mental Health's three regions over the next five years. LOCATION # OF BEDS,, PROJECT ST.~'I:US Western Riversicie County 20 Status; Seeking Local Juri~;diction Support Eastern Riverside Cou~lty 20 Status: Seeking Local Jurisdiction Support Central Riverside Cou~'ty 20 ~i~'tus: Seeking Local Jurisdiction Support __ HOUSING FOR FORMER FOSTER CHILDREN Each month, approximately 13.5 children age out of the Foster Care System in Riverside County. To support that population, there is currently one six-bed transitional shelter for former foster children who are females. In development is an additional 20-bed transitional program for former foster children, which is exp.ected to be operational by the end of this year. Both of these projects are in the City of Riverside and are operated by Operation Safehouse. DPSS anticipates the need fdr, a total of 85 beds annually based on the number of foster care children who age-out of the system. To meet this need, a minimum of sixty additional beds would need to be developed throughout the County. Ideally, these beds should be located close to community colleges and universities, as education and training are the best chance that these children have to build a life of self-sufficiency. The programs run by Operation Safehouse can be used as a model to develop additional programs in other areas of the County. More information regarding services to foster children are provided later in this report. [0CAT~'0~I'" # OF BEDS PROJECT STAT[JS City of Riverside - Transitional $1~ould be finaliz~' March 2001; Shelter for Former Foster Children 20 Construction/Rahab to begin soon; (Operation Safehouse) Anticipated completion by end of 2001 Temecu]a, Murrieta and the '" 60 Status; Recommend State Legislative Coacheile Valley Proposal for additional funding]: HUD SUPER NOFA UPDATE Since the Homeless Summit, DPSS has received information from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regarding the status of the County's 2000 Consolidated Application. For the previous five years, the HUD Super NOFA has been the primary source of funding for transitional housing projects and some permanent housing projects in the County. HUD has traditionally awarded Riverside County 3-year grants averaging $3.5 million. This year's allocation was a one-year grant of less than $1.5 million, which only provides sufficient funding to support all five renewal projects for one year. Although a new permanent housing program was listed as the top priority in our application, which is consistent with HUD's priorities for funding, the grant award is not sufficient to support this or any new projects in our application. Due to HUE)'s restricted funding allocations, some projects that were critical to the County's Continuum 'Of. Care were denied, including: 1. A 120-bed transitional Shelter for families at March Air Reserve Base 2. A 20-bed transitional housing project for the mentally ill in San Jacinto 3. A program that would increase the staff in the Department of Mental Health's Homeless Intervention Team 4. A transportation program for the homeless in wbstern and central Riverside County. The Department has contacted HUD Field Office staff in Los Angeles who indicated that most counties in their region were treated in the same manner as Riverside County. San Bernardino County only received funding for two renewal projects. However, statewide, many jurisdictions not only received funding for new projects but also 3-year allocations. When compared with these jurisdictions on a per capita basis, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties received the least amount of funding per capita (see Attachment B). The average allocation statewide was $3.97 per capita; however, Riverside County only received $0.87 per capita. This information clearly demonstrates that Riverside County is being significantly underfunded. The HUD Los Angeles Field Office is coordinating a conference call with Washington, D,C, staff so that we can better understand the reasons for such limited funding this year. Preliminary explanations indicate that our 2000 application, which used the same methods as previous applications, was not ranked high enough to warrant additional funding. In addition to working directly with HUD, the Department is coordinating with other jurisdictions to improve future applications and our chances for additional funding, Following is a list of the projects awarded funding. Attachment C contains the full list of projects in priority order. AMOUNT PROJECT/DESCRIPTION .... # OF BEDS APPROVED Inland AIDS Project (Renewal) 6 - Transitional Housing for Substance ^buse/HIVIAIDS $108,128 Desert AIDS Project (Renewal) Supportive - Hupportiv~ Services for HIV/AIDS Services $152,818 Operation SafeHouse (Renewal) 6 - Transitional Housing for Former Foster Child. ran $95,641 Valley Restart Shelter, Inc. (Renewal) 7 - Transitional Housing Program .... $66,280 Whiteside Manor, Inc. (Renewal) 30 - Transitional.Housing for Dually-Diagnosed Mentally III $896,._399 TOTAL 49 $1,319,266 Since HUD Funding is 'such' a critical component to existing and expanding homeless services, this year's allbcation is especially disturbing and compels us to recommend that an aggressive legislative platform be adopted, as follows: RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Board of Supervisors: 1. Authorize the chairman to send a letter to HUD expressing the County's dissatisfaction with this year's allocation, emphasizing the impact to critical new homeless programs. 2. Adopt a Federal legislative platform to aggressively seek additional HUD funding in support of new transitional and permanent housing projects. Direct the County's federal legislative representative to further the Board's position and schedule meetings with HUD officials during the annual trip to Washington, D.C. ]0 CITIES AND SERVICE PROVIDERS UPDATE Since the Homeless Summit in December, there have been several significant developments with cities and services providers related to homeless programs and services. City of Riverside: On January 9, 2001, the City of Riverside approved the allocation of $350,000 towards the construction of a women and children's emergency shelter within the City. With this commitment, the County is prepared to move forward with the construction of the facility. The City has also requested that we submit a joint application to the State for the Emergency Housing Assistance Program's Capital Construction Grant. We are currently working with City staff to complete the application. As approved by you~' Board on December 18, 2000 (agenda item #1.0), the Department, in coordinatiOn with Facilities Management, is in the process of selecting a contractor to begin work on the Riverside Women and Children's Shelter. The City will be working with us to "fast-track" the conditional use permit process. In addition to this appropriation, the City also approved the formation of a task force to develop a plan for the City's participation in the regional homeless services support system within the context of the Continuum of Care Plan. The task force will be convened in the next few weeks and, with the assistance of a consultant, will have approximately 90-days to prepare the report back to the City. Similar to the united approach taken in the Coachella Valley, the City of Riverside's continued commitment to addressing homeless needs in their iurisdiction and to working in partnc.rship with the County, service providers and community advocates will serve as a model for other jurisdictions in the county. City of Hemet: On January 3, 2001, at the City's request, a meeting was held at the City of Hemet with Mayor Robin Reeser Lowe, Councilwoman Led Van Arsdale and Mark Trabing, Manager of the City's Housing Division. In addition to the city officials, there were representatives from Supervisor Variable's Office, Valley Restart and DPSS. The purpose of the meeting was to review the discussions at the Homeless Summit, as they were unable to send a representative, and to discuss the City's role in cooperation with Valley Restart, to address homeless needs in the Hamer Valley. The City expressed support for the development of services in regions surrounding the Hamer Valley as well as support for Valley Restart's proposed facility renovation project. However, the City has continuing concerns regarding tl~e impact that the surrounding areas have on Valley Restart ITEM 1 ITEM 2 Minutes for the January 16, 2001 RCIP Workshop will be delivered to you on Monday MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY'COUNCIL JANUARY 9, 2001 The City Council convened in Closed Session at 6:00 P.M. and convened in a regular meeting at 7:04 P.M., on Tuesday, January 9, 2001, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Present: Councilmembers: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone Absent: Councilmember: None PRELUDE MUSIC The prelude music was provided by Eve Craig. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor McComas of Hope Lutheran. ALLEGIANCE The salute to the Flag was led by Councilman Stone. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS As this year's Mayor, Mayor Comerchero advised that he will be imposing two changes as it relates to the City Council meetings: one, that the screens will be in use during the meeting and two, that the electronic voting system will be used. Status Report from Traffic Commission - Emergency Traffic Circulation Plan Chairwoman Edwards provided an update on the Commission's efforts relative to the Emergency Traffic Circulation Plan (ETCP), noting the following: · That the Commission has established a subcommittee to review the ETCP - comprised of Commissioner Connerton and Chairwoman Edwards · That the subcommittee has met twice to review existing and potential new circulation programs · That once a subcommittee recommendation is formulated, it will be forwarded to the Commission for review and ultimately to the City Council for final consideration. Mayor Comerchero advised that the matter will be agendized at the City Council level at the time the Commission is ready to proceed. Citizen Opinion Survey Presentation - Godbe Research and Analysis Assistant to the City Manager Yates introduced Dr. Tim McLarney of Godbe and Associates, who, in turn, referenced specific highlights of the City's second opinion survey and introduced Mr. Richard Sarles, senior research analyst of Godbe and Associates. R:\Minutes\010901 1 By way of a PowerPoint presentation, Mr. Sarles proceeded with a detailed overview of the survey, noting the following: · Research objectives - residents perception regarding traffic/growth/specific services/programs · Methodology in addressing the research objectives- telephone survey · Overall satisfaction - highest scoring percentage he has seen in overall satisfaction · Issues of Importance · What residents like about Temecula · What residents feel needs to improved · Perception of Traffic Circulation · Perception of Growth In closing, Mr. Sarles reviewed the survey's conclusions and proposed recommendations. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS A. Having served on the City Council for one year, Councilman Pratt clarified his position on growth management and traffic by reading into the record his letter of January 9, 2001 (copies were submitted for the record). B. Having attended the first California High Speed Public Forum in Escondido, Mayor Pro Tern Roberts provided background information; noted that the process is in the environmental clearance phase (two-year process); and stated that he would keep the City Council and public apprised. C. Advising that it has come to his attention that the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFVV) must, due to a rent increase, vacate their current location, Mayor Comerchero requested that an item be agendized for the next City Council meeting, exploring the possibility of reassigning the earlier Community Services Funding allocation of $4,800 for the installation of water meter for the purpose of possible relocation expenses. D. In closing, Mayor Comerchero advised that he has discussed with staff the establishment of a more proactive public relations service which would be in concurrence with the recently completed citizens' survey. In correlation with the public relations service, Mr. Comerchero requested the design of a City logo box which would include the City's Web site address, noting that the City's Web site address has changed to www.cityoftemecula.or,q. CONSENT CALENDAR Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. R:\Minutes\010901 2 2 3 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of October 24, 2000; 2.2 Approve the minutes of November 14, 2000. Resolution Approving List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 0t-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 City Treasurer's Report as of November 30, 2000 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of November 30, 2000 5 State of California Energy Commission Grants and Loans Office - Peak Loan Reduction Program - Liqht Emittin,q Diode (LED) Traffic Si,qna Conversion Grant Award RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND DESIGNATING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER AS THE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE TO IMPLEMENT AND CARRY OUT THE PURPOSES OF THE GRANT AWARD OF $140,870.00 TO REPLACE INCANDESCENT TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHTS WITH LIGHT EMITTING DIODES AT EACH TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND INTERSECTION WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA 5.2 Approve a Grant Funding appropriation in the amount of $140,870.00 from State energy Commission. 5.3 Approve a budget transfer of $175,000.00 in Capital Reserves from the Santiago / Ynez Road / Intersection and Signal Improvement Project to the Light Emitting Diode's Grant Project. R:\Minutes\010901 3 6 Quitclaim Public Utility Easements as dedicated on Tract Map No. 3334 within a podion of Lot 27, that portion being Tract Map No. 28810, a resubdivision of Tract Map No. 3334 (located on Margar ta Road east of Moraga Road) RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 0t-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING QUITCLAIM OF PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS LOCATED WITHIN A PORTION OF LOT 27 OF TRACT MAP NO. 3334, THAT PORTION BEING TRACT MAP NO. 28810, A RESUBDIVlSION OF TRACT MAP NO. 3334, TO THE UNDERLYING FEE OWNER 7 Evaluation of Multi-Way Stop Controls on Via Cordoba 8 RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Extend the evaluation period and maintain the temporary multi-way stop signs until other viable alternatives are evaluated. (Pulled for separate discussion; see page 6.) Acceptance of certain Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System within Tract No. 23583 (located northeasterly of intersection of Calle Madero at North General Kearny Road) 9 RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 23583) Completion and Acceptance for the FY99-00 Pavement Manaqement System - Vario,~ Streets (Ynez Road from Santiago Road to East Vallejo Avenue) - Proiect No. PW00-14 RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Accept the project FY99-00 Pavement Management System - Various Streets (Ynez Road from Santiago Road to East Vallejo Avenue) - Project No. PW00-14 - as complete; R:\Minutes\010901 4 9.2 9.3 File a Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven months after filing the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. 10 Resolution of Support RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 0t-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA URGING IMMEDIATE INTERVENTION BY FEDERAL AND STATE GOVERNMENT TO REFORM THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC ENERGY MARKETPLACE (Pulled for separate discussion; see page 6.) 11 Community Development Block Grant application Proposals for FY 2001/0;) RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding recommendation from the Finance Committee and staff; 11.2 Authorize the Director of Finance to execute Sub-Recipient Agreements and to reprogram CDBG funds from completed projects in accordance with the current budget resolution for general administration of the Fiscal Year 2001-02 Community Development Block Grant Funds. (Pulled for separate discussion; see page 7.) MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 6 and 8-9 (Item Nos. 7, t0, and 11 were pulled for separate discussion). The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS CONSIDERED UNDER SEPARATE DISCUSSION 7 Evaluation of Multi-Way Stop Controls on Via Cordoba RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Extend the evaluation period and maintain the temporary multi-way stop signs until other viable alternatives are evaluated. Director of Public Works Hughes presented the staff report (as per agenda material). In preparation of this meeting, Mr. Miguel Ameigeras, 31950 Via Cordoba, informed the City Council that he and a neighbor had conducted a speed estimation experiment on Via Cordoba, noting the following information: R:\Minutes\010901 5 · That for every 10 cars, one to two cars were traveling at the allowable speed limit and that seven to eight cars were traveling at 30 to 35 m.p.h, with some traveling in excess of 45 m.p.h. · That for every 10 cars, two stopped at the stop sign and that eight slowed down. Advising that the wideness of the road creates a speed element and that the east-to-west downhill further compounds the speeding problem, Mr. Ameigeiras urged the City Council to take action with regard to his noted issues of concern and suggested the installation of speed bumps in an effort to reduce speed. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tern Roberts moved to approve staff's recommendation. The motion was seconded by Councilman Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. For Mr. Ameigeiras, Mayor Comerchero confirmed that Council's action does not abandon other solutions and that it merely extends the evaluation period and maintains the temporary multi-way stop signs until other viable alternatives are evaluated. 10 Resolution of Support RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA URGING IMMEDIATE INTERVENTION BY FEDERAL AND STATE GOVERNMENT TO REFORM THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC ENERGY MARKETPLACE At Councilman Naggar's request, City Clerk Jones read Resolution No. 01-05 into the record. Realizing and foreseeing the potential impacts of this situation, Councilman Naggar advised that the City had formed an Electrical Needs Subcommittee in order to exam impacts on the City of Temecula, noting that the City is accomplishing everything it can on a local level and that the Subcommittee will meet to establish recommendations which will be forwarded to the City Council for review. MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to adopt Resolution No. 01-05. The motion was seconded by Councilman Roberts and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 11 Community Development Block Grant application Proposals for FY 2001102 RECQMMENDATIQN: 11.1 Approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding recommendation from the Finance Committee and staff; 11.2 Authorize the Director of Finance to execute Sub-Recipient Agreements and to reprogram CDBG funds from completed projects in accordance with the current budget resolution for general administration of the Fiscal Year 2001-02 Community Development Block Grant Funds. R:\Minutes\010901 6 By way of overheads, Senior Management Analyst Papagolas presented the staff report (as per written material) and referenced the Finance Committee's funding recommendations (per applicant), noting that the requested amount for the Senior Center was no longer necessary because adequate funds were available to complete the desired improvements. In the event CDBG funding were greater or less than estimated, Finance Director Roberts advised that all requests would be equally adjusted. In light of the $5,000 request, Mayor Pro Tem Roberts expressed concern with this year's funding recommendation of $1,934 for the Friends of the Temecula Library. With regard to Alternatives to Domestic Violence, YMCA, and the Boys & Girls Club of Temecula, Mr. Roberts requested that those funds be approved with the stipulation that allocated funds be utilized for the citizens of Temecula. As a result of last year's Pechanga fire, Mr. Wayne Hall, 27715 Jefferson, Suite 117, representing the American Red Cross, advised that the lack of radio/communication equipment was discovered. Commenting on the funding request of $16,867 in order to purchase such equipment, Mr. Hall expressed appreciation for the $10,000 funding recommendation but advised that the new office in the City of Temecula has the appropriate manpower but that it does not have the appropriate equipment. Addressing Mayor Pro Tem Roberts' comment with regard to funding for the Library, Councilman Stone, echoed by Mayor Comerchero, commented on the difficulty of making these funding allocations but having reviewed the City Council's history in supporting the Friends and the Library, it was the Finance Committee's opinion that the City has fulfilled its sincere obligation of supporting the Friends and ultimately the building a new library in the City. For Mr. Hall, Councilman Stone encouraged American Red Cross to apply for upcoming Community Services Funding. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tern Roberts moved to approve the staff recommendation with the stipulation that the monies for Alternatives to Domestic Violence, Boys & Girls Club of Temecula, and YMCA be retained in the City to service the residents of the City. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. At 7:56 P.M., Mayor Comerchero convened as the Community Services District and the Redevelopment Agency and after a brief recess, reconvened the City Council meeting at 8:14 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING 12 Request to adopt a resolution initiatinq the annexation proceedinqs for a 640-acre portion of the Roripau.qh Ranch Specific Plan Area (Plannin~ Application No. PA94-0073) RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Continue the public hearing to the January 23, 2001 City Council Meeting. Mayor Comerchero briefed the staff report (as per written material) and opened the public hearing. Mr. John Mize, 32850 Vista Del Monte, expressed concern with the project as it relates to · Land compatibility R:\Minutes\010901 7 · Traffic · Demand on water and electricity · Increased air pollution · Buffering Mrs. Nancy Mize, 32850 Vista Del Monte, as well commented on land compatibility concerns and, therefore, requested that the proposed buffer be increased on the southeast corner of the project. Mayor Comerchero closed the public hearing. MOTION: Councilman Mayor Stone moved to continue this matter off calendar. The motion was seconded by Councilman Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 13 Wolf Creek Specific Plan RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 0t- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR THE WOLF CREEK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. t2 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99- 0482) AND RELATED ACTIONS, AND ADOPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH 13.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 98- 0484 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE WOLF CREEK SPECIFIC PLAN ON PARCELS TOTALING 557 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF PALA ROAD, BETWEEN LOMALINDA ROAD AND DEER HOLLOW ROAD (FORMERLY FAIRVlEW AVENUE) AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 950-110-002, -005, -033, AND 950-180-001, -005, -006, AND -010 BASED UPON THE ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS CONTAINED IN THE STAFF REPORT R:\Minutes\010901 8 13.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 98- 0481 - WOLF CREEK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 12 ON PARCELS TOTALING 557 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF PALA ROAD, BETWEEN LOMALINDA ROAD AND DEER HOLLOW ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 950-110-002, -005, -033, AND 950-180-001, -005, -006, AND - 010 BASED UPON THE FINDINGS CONTAINED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 13.4 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 01- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 98- 0481 - THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MATRIX FOR THE WOLF CREEK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. t2 ON PARCELS TOTALING 557 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF PALA ROAD, BETWEEN LOMALINDA ROAD AND DEER HOLLOW ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 950-110-002, - 005, -033, AND 950-180-001, -005, -006, AND -010 13.5 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00- 0052 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 29305, THE SUBDIVISION OF 557 ACRES INTO 47 LOTS WHICH CONFORM TO THE PLANNING AREAS, OPEN SPACE AREAS, SCHOOL AND PARK SITES OF THE WOLF CREEK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 12, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF PALA ROAD, BETWEEN LOMALINDA ROAD AND DEER HOLLOW ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 950-110-002, -005, -033, AND 950-180-001, -005, -006, AND - 010 Planning Director Ubnoske reviewed the staff report (of record); addressed the December 6, 1999 Planning Commission recommendation to approve the project subject to 12 modifications; advised that the modifications have been added to the conditions of approval (as per written material); and noted that staff concurred with 6 of the 12 modifications, stating the following: R:\Minutes\010901 9 Modifications recommended by the Planning Commission Augment the Mitigation Monitoring Program with the General Plan EIR mitigations o That Condition No. 6 of the Specific Plan requires the applicant to comply with all applicable mitigation measures contained in the adopted City of Temecula General Plan; staff is of the opinion that there is sufficient language in the condition of approval to assure compliance with these mitigation measures Specify only one option for narrower streets o That it is important to have flexibility with respect to the street sections and that Condition No. 15 of the Specific Plan addresses narrower streets Require that the City hire an architect consultant to review the Planned Development Overlay o That the language in Condition No. 16 of the Specific Plan was changed to read as follows: When courtyard homes are implemented, a Planned Development Overlay (PDO) shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission as opposed to a Planned Development Overlay; that because design guidelines in the Specific Plan are sufficient and because the Planning Commission and staff review the PDO, staff has concerns with hiring an outside architect · Delete the split garage option o That staff would request flexibility with regard to this item Require garages in lieu of carports in the multi-family senior housing projects o That staff would request flexibility with regard to this item; that the project is a 10- year build out project and that it would be difficult to determine, at this point in time, what the market may dictate in the future Require Product Review approval from the Planning Commission o That the Development Code requires that product review is discussed at the Director's hearing and that deviating from that process would require a change to the Development Code. With regard to Condition No. 12 of the Specific Plan, Councilman Stone requested that the term church site be changed to religious institution. For Councilman Pratt, Planning Director Ubnoske advised that there is a distance requirement imposed by ABC between religious institutions and bars/taverns. In response to Councilman Naggar, Planning Commissioner Mathewson addressed the six modifications with which the Planning Commission and staff did not concur, noting the following: Augment the Mitigation Monitoring Program with the General Plan EIR mitigations o Planning Commission was desirous of another level of assurance as to the compliance of the mitigation measures; Planning Director Ubnoske noted that this matter is addressed in the actual condition of approval. · Specify only one option for narrower streets R:\Minutes\010901 10 Planning Commission was desirous of narrower streets to create a more pedestrian friendly/traffic calming measure; Planning Director Ubnoske noted that staff would concur with the Commission and that proposed Condition No. 15 would address that matter. Require that the City hire an architect consultant to review the PDO o Planning Commission viewed the hiring of an architect as an opportunity to ensure high quality architectural treatment throughout the site; Planning Commission was desirous of reviewing product design and that the hiring of an architect would assist in that review process. Delete the split garage option o Planning Commission was desirous of minimizing the appearance of an automobile-based development and wanted the appearance of less-garage oriented development Require garages in lieu of carports in the multi-family senior housing projects o Planning Commission received public input in support garages rather than carports. · Require Product Review approval from the Planning Commission o Planning Commission was desirous to participate in the produce review approval. To address the Planning Commission's desire to participate in the product review, Mayor Comerchero suggested the formation of a Planning Commission subcommittee, comprised of two Planning Commissioners, that would partake in the Director's hearings and provide input as to product review. As to the hiring of an architect, Deputy City Manager Thornhill commented on staffing as well as budgetary concerns, noting that a Specific Plan is developed with the intent to develop design guidelines which permit creativity and flexibility. To further address that Planning Commission's desires, Mr. Thomhill suggested that the Commission readdress the design guidelines to their satisfaction. In response to Councilman Naggar, Deputy City Manager Thornhill confirmed that the City does staff a landscape architect and that a vast majority of landscape review is for commercial/industrial projects which are not part of a Specific Plan and, therefore, have no real design guidelines. Although understanding Deputy City Manager Thornhill's comments, Councilman Stone as well concurred with Mayor Comerchero's suggestion to create a Planning Commission subcommittee to attend Director's hearing in order to review product design. In response to Mayor Comerchero's recommendation to form a Planning Commission subcommittee, Deputy City Manager Thornhill advised that the Director's hearing occur during the day time and that the attendance of two Planning Commissioners would impose noticing requirements. In an effort to address the Commission's concerns, Mr. Thomhill suggested to meet with the Chair or designated Planning Commissioners to address the matter. For Councilman Stone, Community Services Director Parker advised that the City has required other Specific Plans, with respect to parklands, to use reclaimed water at park sites. R:\Minutes\010901 11 By way of overheads, Deputy City Manager Thornhill reviewed the specifics of the Development Agreement, referencing the following: · 40-acre Sports Park · land dedication of 12.37 acres in exchange for a $1,117 per unit credit towards the Development Agreement Fee · land dedication of 15.34 acres in exchange for $2,800,000 Parks DIF credits and includes $175 per unit credit · land dedication of 12.29 acres towards satisfying the Quimby requirements · street improvements along the frontage on Pala and the Loop Road concurrent with the phasing of the Specific Plan · half street improvement of Deer Hollow fronting the park plus 10' if the street improvements are not completed as part of the High School construction by the time the park is completed · 6.0-acre Community Park · accelerate completion of the park prior to the issuance of the 600th building permit versus the 800th building permit · Linear Park Activity Node Improvements · Includes improvement of three linear park activity nodes along Wolf Valley Road in exchange for $150,000 credit · 1.5-acre Park- adjacent to Kent Hintergardt Park · would provide for the acceleration of the dedication of the land adjacent to the park to be utilized for additional parking for the existing park · provide for frontage improvements to Via de Coronado · Administrative Facility · Accept a 1.63-acre next to the fire station possibly for an administrative facility · 1.5-acre Fire Station site · land dedication of 1.5 acres · a maximum $700,000 no interest advance from the developer to the City for the construction of the $1,600,000 fire station to be paid back over time with fire mitigation component of the DIF; it was noted by City Manager Nelson that there would be no obligation to the City's General Fund in terms of the repayment · if the developer were to build outside of Planning Area 16, the developer shall provide a temporary fire station at a location acceptable to the Fire Chief at his cost and the City shall provide the operation and maintenance costs · Creation of a Community Facilities District · Provide funding for all major improvements and long-term maintenance of the grass-lined channel on Pala Road between the bridge and Deer Hollow · Must be created prior to the issuance of the first building permit for the project · Developer shall advance 100% of the cost of the sound wall if the City were unable to secure funds to construct the sound wall and that the City may reimburse the applicant as funds are made available by other sources to the City for this sound wall R:\Minutes\010901 12 · At this time, no other sources have been identified; suggested sources were contributions from Assessment District 159 and possibly contributions by further expansion of Pechanga and Pechanga's contribution toward the Pala Road widening project · Development Impact Fees · Developer would receive 100% credit for the street improvements, traffic signal, fire, corporate facility (partial credit if the City were to accept the 1.63-acre site), and park and recreation components · Commercial component - 100% credit for street improvements, traffic signal, and partial credit for corporate facilities and no credit for fire in corporate facility components · $200 per unit payment toward future public art and open space and designated for habitat protection · Level of Service D · Prior to approval of tentative tract maps or any time extensions for the tentative maps, the developer shall submit traffic studies that demonstrate a Level of Service D or better for the intersection of 1-15 and SR79 · Development Agreement · Original recommendation was 10 years from the date the agreement was approved; the developer is requesting that the 10-year term date commence at a later date · Staff desirous of imposing language to ensure leve~ of service D on Pala Road between La Paz and Bedford Court Deputy City Manager Thornhill noted that the 40-acre sports park, 1.5-acre park, and 1.5~acre fire station site offered by the developer on the effective date of the Development Agreement shall be free of liens within six months after the effective date of the Development Agreement; reiterated that the developer is responsible for all street improvements fronting the 6.5-acre park, 1.5-acre park, administrative facility, and fire station; and stated that the developer has been making significant payments to AD 159. Councilman Stone requested that if the Development Agreement were approved, the design of the fire station should concurrently commence as well as negotiations with the County to create a joint partnership considering Redhawk is located in the County. For Councilman Stone, Community Services Director Parker advised that the Quimby requirements for this project would be 28.23 acres and that the developer is actually providing a total of 54 acres of parkland, double the requirement. For Councilman Naggar, Mr. Parker noted that there would be no taxpayer costs for the procurement of the land for the sports park. For Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, Public Works Director Hughes noted the following: · that there will be no storm detention basins and that it will be free flowing · that the developer will be responsible for the design and ensuring accuracy for the entire drainage system including the grass-lined channel; that the City will be reviewing the calculations · that the portion from Loma Linda, the City is in the process of completing the design of that storm drain system at this time and that the hydrology work has been completed. At this time, Mayor Comerchero opened the public hearing. R:\Minutes\010901 13 Mr. William Griffith, applicant, 15751 Rockfield, #100, Irvine, introduced Mr. Sam AIhadeff, 45730 Enterprise Circle South (representing the applicant), who, in turn, referenced Councilman Pratt's statement read into the record with regard to growth management and traffic and expressed concern as to Mr. Councilman Pratt's potential inability to compromise his views as it relates to this project. In response to Mr. Alhadeff, City Attorney Thorson noted that if Councilman Pratt were of the opinion that he cannot vote for this type of project, as a Specific Plan, because of traffic issues, he is not precluded from voting; that City Councilmembers are entitled and may discuss general issues about traffic; that the only concern would be whether or not taking a position on a specific project; and that this project being a Specific Plan does not preclude a City Councilmember from expressing a view with regard to the specific proposal. Addressing the proposed project, Mr. Griffith commented on the following: · that the project began approximately three years ago and that he has worked with members of staff, community, homeowners associations, School District, Assessment District, County Agencies, Pechanga Band of Indians, etc. · that the development plan is a well thought out community · that this project will attempt to address current deficiencies as referenced in the City's General Plan By way of overheads, Mr. Griffith noted that all components of this project include 113 acres and proceeded with a brief history description of the area of discussion, noting that the City has experienced rapid growth and that as part of this growth, he has participated in the dedication of right-of-ways, drainage easements, formation of AD 159 for the construction and funding of major infrastructure components to support the growth not only of this property by surrounding properties; and that he has attempted to work with neighbors through public meetings, focus sessions and negotiations to address deficiencies which exist in this part of the City. Proceeding with the presentation of the proposed plan, Mr. Griffith noted the following: · that traffic is a major issue as are traffic mitigation measures · that originally under the General Plan, the project had a targeted density of 2,600 to 2,700 units; that under the Growth Management Policy, the project is at 1,890 units and a total of approximately 2,000 units with the senior housing option · that, as per his calculations, the maximum allowable units under the General Plan would be 3,500 units. By way of a PowerPoint presentation, Mr. Barry Burnell of T&B Planning, 3242 Halladay, #100, Santa Ana, representing the applicant, addressed the elements of the project and its location, noting the following: · that Assessment District 159 was established in 1989 and the Wolf Creek project has paid into this Assessment District on the assumption and expectation, based on the City's General Plan, that there would be a development project on this site · that the project site is almost completely surrounded by development and developing areas with the exception on the south side which is vacant and cleared land and which is part of the Redhawk project and slated for medium density residential development and highway tourist commercial and one alternative location for a new high school site · that the proposed project is bound by Pala Road on the west; Wolf Valley Road runs through the middle of the project to the east into the Redhawk project area; R:\Minutes\010901 14 Loma Linda is on the north edge of the project; Fairview Road is on the southend and Via del Coronado is between the residential areas and the northeast corner of the project leading to Ken Hintegardt Park · that the General Plan, as adopted in the early 1990s, reflected this project as a Iow- medium density project with a central core area of high density on both sides of the neighborhood and community commercial and reflected open space facilities in three locations as well as public institutional uses (three anticipated sites - elementary, middle, and high school sites); that the General Plan, when adopted, reflected the Redhawk area as Iow-medium density as well as the adjacent areas as well as the area on the west side of Pata Road · that the Village Center component has also been designated in the General Plan · Land Use Plan - submitted with the Environmental Impact Report; target density under the General Plan would be 2,601 units with several options, if the schools were not developed, for increasing the number of units; that the high school site will be eliminated; that the Village Center evolved as did the green belt along Pala Road, the linear parks, the two school site (elementary and middle), private recreation area, fire station facility; that the multi-family housing with the exception of senior housing (Planning Area 18) has been eliminated; that all 4,000 to 4,500 square foot single-family residential lots have been eliminated, requiring a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet to be located immediately adjacent to the Village Center and adjacent to Redhawk; that the Village Center will be compatible with its surrounding neighbors and that access to the Center as all other noted facilities with the exception of the private recreation area will be available to the public and the cost will be borne by the Wolf Creek project · That a religious institution will be permitted use in the Village Center concept · That the private recreation facility will include a junior Olympic pool and water play area and meeting hall · That the proposed project has a mixture of uses which are not being amended only rearranged; that because of the high school site relocating, the public/institution facilities component will be a somewhat lower and that there will be an increase in the open with the addition of the 40-acre sports park · That the General Plan reflects a high density of 3,236 and a Iow density of 1,889; that the project was originally submitted at 2,601 units; and that the current project is at 1,881 without the senior housing component and at 2,222 units with the senior housing component · That added project amenities include the following: · Narrower street section, separated parkway, and sidewalks within the local street system · Added a center median on Wolf Valley Road adjacent to the Village Center · 6-acre neighborhood park · 40-acre City sports park · recreation center and its components For Councilman Naggar, Mr. Burnell noted that both school sites are subject to a school mitigation and acquisition agreement which would have covered the high school as well but was deleted; that both school sites are under contract with the School District; that the middle school is under construction; that, as long as this project proceeds, no homes will be built on these two sites; and that the water play area would be located in the 3.5 acre private area. Mr. Burnell also provided clarification as to the trail system of the Specific Plan, commenting on paths .and types of trails. R:\Minutes\010901 15 Expressing concern with regard to the requested lot coverage of 40% to 55% considering the Development Code permits a lot coverage of 35% for medium and Iow-medium density, Mr. Griffith noted that the purpose of the requested lot coverage would be to create flexibility; noted that the 55% lot coverage would only be permitted for single-story structures; and stated that the lots would be subject to design review. Mr. Burnell, for Councilman Stone, advised that the paseos, as well as the trails, will be lit by the street lighting system. Councilman Stone relayed his support of the landscaped median on Wolf Valley Road and the green belt along Pala Road. Mr. Burnell advised that the maintenance of the trails will be maintained by a Community Service Level. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, Mr. Griffith advised that it would be punitive that the onus of the parkway maintenance be on the homeowners association and that a condition has been accepted to plant the parkways in front of the schools to ensure landscaping compatibility with the rest of the community. Councilman Stone requested that the ingress/egress of the schools be properly engineered to assist with the mitigation of traffic gridlock at schools. For Mr. Stone, Mr. Burnell advised that the split garage concept would create varying setbacks. With regard to the proposed sports park configurations, Mayor Comerchero noted that they were only conceptual in nature in an effort to demonstrate possibilities. Councilman Naggar requested that the split garage homes be designed in a fashion to ensure visibility of the front of the house from the front of the property. In response to Mr. Naggar, both Deputy City Manager Thornhill and Mr. Griffith advised that the request could be written into the design guidelines. Responding to Councilman Stone's suggestion to request the developer to install earthquake gas valves, Deputy City Manager Thornhill noted that the matter could be explored at the discretion of the Building and Safety Official. Mr. Stone encouraged a City incentive to ensure installation of such gas valves at all private residences. By way of a matrix, Mr. Bob Kahn, traffic consultant for the project, addressed the traffic levels of service, noting the following: · that the overriding consideration in the traffic analysis was to ensure the City's goals/objectives of achieving Level of Service D were maintained; · that the traffic study was completed over two years ago; that the trip generation was based on 2,600 units which has been reduced to 1,900 units and, thereby, creating an overall trip reduction by 26%; · that the project, if approved, will be contributing to substantial widening and right-of- way dedications to Pala Road; · that the project will participate in the funding of improvements along SR79 through the Assessment District; · that the project will be phased and will still achieve the Level of Service D requirement of the City. By way of charts, Mr. Camille Bahri, representing the applicant, further defined the various stages of the project and the expected Level of Service at each stage, commenting on timeframe, funding, extent of needed improvements per stage, noting that the anticipated project build out would be 2009, stating the following: R:\Minutes\010901 16 · that a condition has been imposed with regard to Pala Road, advising that if the Level of Service were to deteriorate below D, the issuance of building permits would stop; · that the project conforms and complies with the City's current General Plan. As to the traffic analysis, Mr. Griffith clarified that the traffic analysis, based on land availability and capacity, includes a tripling of the level of operation at Pechanga casino; that many of the improvements along Pala Road, SR 79, and the SR79 interchange at Interstate 15 have been included as part of the global financing for this portion of the City through Assessment District 159; that Wolf Creek's contribution to the funding of the Pala Road Corridor ($17 million project) will be $6.8 million (43%); and that Wolf Creek could utilize AD 159 to fund its portion or could create a Community Facilities District. Mr. Griffith advised that AD 159 has funded the following projects in the past years: · approximately $1.2 million dollar toward the interchange expansion · SR79 - $6.4 million · Additional monies have been authorized and are available for continued expansion of SR79 and the interchange improvements In response to Councilman Naggar, who relayed his support of road improvements being completed prior to the issuance of building permits, Mr. Gdffith advised that two proposals have been discussed for the expansion of Pala Road, stating the following: · Four-lane interim expansion · Ultimate improvements - six-lane - includes SR79, the remodification of the intersection to the south of Deer Hollow Road, striping, right-of-way acquisitions, sound wall, storm drain facilities, and signals · That pending the City's decision as to which proposal, the developer would be ready to proceed with either. Although the decision as to whether to proceed with the four-lane or six-lane improvements would be the City's, Public Works Director Hughes advised that it would as well depend on the available bonding capacity this property has in place; that the project has been imposed a condition to have in place a financing and implementation program of either proposal prior to the issuance of any building permits; and that it would be approximately two to three years until the City would derive any benefit from the ultimate improvements (6 lanes), noting that the developer may not proceed until the funding is secured for the permanent improvements. In response to Councilman Stone, Mayor Pro Tem Roberts advised that, although to no avail to this point in time, he has attempted to meet with Mr. Mark Macarro, representing Pechanga, to discuss Pechanga's financial commitment to the ultimate improvements. If Pechanga were not to participate in a financial commitment for these improvements, Public Works Director Hughes, for Councilman Naggar, noted that the onus would be on the developer. In light of Councilman Pratt's suggestion, City Attorney Thorson and Councilman Stone suggested that Mayor Comerchero and Mayor Pro Tern Roberts proceed with efforts to meet as quickly as possible with Pechanga representatives. For Councilman Pratt, Mr. Kahn confirmed that there were no traffic overriding considerations and that all traffic issues are mitigateable by certain improvements. Mr. Pratt reemphasized his R:\Minutes\010901 17 encouragement of public transportation to which Mr. Griffith stated that, in his opinion, the Village Center concept, the paseo system, the land use relationships are current in terms of transportation planning and, therefore, minimizing unnecessary trips. Although appreciating Councilman Pratt's concern with the current autoculture, Councilman Stone noted that the proposed project is a pure Village Center concept; that the City will address County development along the City's periphery; and that the City may not hold the developer responsible for County impacts. To address Councilman Naggar's comments with regard to overriding consideration for air quality, Ms. Laura Stetson, Cotton Bridges Associates, representing the applicant, noted the following: That the project does have significant air quality impacts That mitigation measures have been imposed to lessen the pollutant emissions (referencing the Executive Summary of the Environmental Impact Report) · Work with Riverside Transit Authority to establish transit stops within the commercial developments and other sites within the development · Comply with all energy conservation measures in place at the time the development proceeds · Provide energy-efficient lighting City Attorney Thorson as well referenced the findings noted on pages 48 - 51 of the Statement of Findings and Fact (Wolf Creek Specific Plan) - Section 6 - Project Benefits and Statement of Overriding Considerations. For Councilman Naggar, Ms. Stetson advised that the Environmental Impact Report was completed in August 2000 and that it was completed at a worst-case scenario - during peak hour traffic and density at 2,241 units at build out with the inclusion of a high school site. Deputy City Manager Thornhill noted that since the City's incorporation, density has been reduced by 8 to 10%; that the cumulative impact analysis of the EIR was based on information from the 1993 General Plan EIR; that the General Plan EIR was extraordinarily conservative; that the analysis for the project is based on current traffic numbers and current methodologies of South Coast Air Quality Management District; and that the analysis does not factor any other improvements as a result of new rules and regulations which will as well have beneficial results to the project as to the entire South Coast basin. With Mayor Comerchero requesting an extension past 11:00 P.M., Councilman Stone requested to agendize the policy of extending adjournment times. At this time; Mayor Comerchero opened the public hearing. Mr. Tyler Bailey, 44763 Calle Banuelas, informed the Councilmembers that he currently plays Pop Warner Football and noted that the fields are overcrowded and that more fields with lights are needed. Ms. Linda Weimann, 43330 Calle Mataro, representing Pop Warner, relayed her support of the project because of the sports park as well the other numerous amenities being provided by the developer. R:\Minutes\010901 18 This being the first planned community he has seen coming to the City of Temecula, Mr. Doug Haserot, 41976 Avenida Aluanndo, representing Temecula Soccer Club, addressed the City's current need for lit fields and spoke in support of the project. Although the proposed project has progressed, Mr. Mark Broderick, 45501 Clubhouse, noted that a sports park would be a welcomed feature but not one worth the number of impacts. Commenting on the noise impacts, Mr. Broderick requested the construction of a sound wall extending along Pala Road to Rainbow Canyon. He as well requested that the ultimate improvements (6 lanes) on Pala Road be approved versus the four-lane interim proposal; expressed concern with compatibility of existing adjacent land use; traffic circulation, suggesting the construction of an additional arterial route for the area of discussion; air quality, noting a reduction in the Planning Areas would lessen the impact; noted that the Traffic Circulation General Plan was certified in 1993; that the Wolf Creek traffic analysis was prepared in 1998; that the City's commissioned a traffic study in 1999 which reflected 14.6% higher than the projected; and submitted a petition (signed by 536 residents) relaying the residents' desire for lots in the range of 7,200 square feet. Concurring with the 1999 Wilbur Smith traffic study which reflected that even with the improvements of six lanes in the area of discussion, Councilman Naggar noted that traffic would still be operating at a Level of Service F at Bedford Court and La Paz and the interchange. In an effort to receive additional clarification, Mr. Naggar noted that the study was completed with a calculation figure of approximately 3,600 dwelling units and since those number of units will decrease, so will the traffic impact. For Mr. Naggar, Public Works Director Hughes stated that the removal of the traffic light at Bedford Court would as well assist traffic flow in the area; noted that the signal at Bedford Court will begin to break down and exceed Level of Service D because of its close proximity of and operation of the sequence of the northbound ramp signals and Bedford Court; and advised that alternatives to the removal could be limited to right in/right out or the signal operation be removed but left turn be permitted into the project, noting that the matter will have to be addressed in the future but not necessarily in conjunction with this project. Viewing the project as acceptable if densities were reduced, Mr. Broderick suggested the reduction of 56 dwelling units from the single-family residential and 28 units from Planning Area 18 (multi-family senior housing). Although he has no objection to a housing development and no objection to a sports park, Mr. Rick Barrera, 45639 Corte Lobos, viewed the proposed project as excessive in relation to the City's Growth Management Plan, considering the developer is proposing to develop 13% over the maximum Growth Management Plan because of added amenities. He suggested lowering the density to 1,500 dwelling units which as well would address traffic impact, Iow-income housing ratio would be lowered, widening of Pala Road could possibly be left at four lanes, and air quality impact would be lessened. In his opinion, Mr. Barrera stated that the City has a need for more quality executive homes. In response to Mr. Barrera's suggestion to downsize the property to 1,500 dwelling units, Councilman Naggar advised that such a downsizing would require changing the zone; that the developer has the right to a minimum number of units under zoning which would be 1,900 without the high school. City Clerk Jones advised that copies of the letter from Pechanga will be distributed to the City Council and that a letter of opposition from Ms. Pamela Miod has been distributed to the City Council. R:\Minutes\010901 19 Mayor Pro Tem Roberts suggested that the 1.63 acre lot next the Fire Station be retained as a transit center which would as well assist with the air quality concerns. Mr. Griffith voiced concurrence with the suggestion. Addressing various public comments, Mr. Griffith stated the following: · That changes to the land use were discussed at the Planning Commission but were not supported · That Deer Hollow Road could not be accelerated because of the significant infrastructure involved; that an alternative offer would be to provide paved, all-weather access sufficient for the opening of the sports park as part of the completion of the sports park in the event the high school facility would not proceed and, thereby, alleviating the condition to build four lanes on that portion of Pala Road · That a 6-acre community park is being proposed, not a 6.5-acre park · That the 1.63 acres would be made available to the City as suggested by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts · That although it would be anticipated as net necessary, if it were, interim Fire Station accommodations would be provided at a nominal expense · That the Development Agreement will be dependent upon the City's commitment to the Community Facilities District · That the sound wall issue has been addressed · That he would be agreeable to constructing the infrastructure and request a reimbursement but not also the imposition of the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) · That he would be willing to a $200 per unit fee to be applied toward multi-species habitat fee and habitat preservation and, therefore, would not be subject to an additional Multi- Species Habitat fee · That the requirement of the Level of Service D at the interchange of Highway 15 and SR79 be removed from the Development Agreement and be placed as a condition · That the term of the Development Agreement would request that the term begin with the issuance of the first building permit or an absolute time · That the maintenance costs of the parkways within the development not be imposed upon the homeowners association · That the infrastructure for the use of reclaimed water is not available; if available, would be willing to proceed with its usage In closing, Mr. Griffith thanked the City Council, Planning Commissioners, staff, and public for their patience with regard to this project and requested support of it. In response to Mr. Griffith, Deputy City Manager Thomhill clarified staff's position as to the access to the sports park, requiring four lanes, all-weather access; that staff could support the Community Facilities District; that the Level of Service D issue should be removed from the Development Agreement and placed as a condition with the inclusion of the Bedford Court and La Paz and the link between Pala Road and the freeway; that the proposed term for the Development Agreement would be acceptable; and that the TUMF and Habitat Conservation fees have been completely mitigated. Public Works Director Hughes informed the City Council that imposing the six-lane requirement to Wolf Valley Road rather than what is currently reflected in the Circulation Element (six lanes to Loma Linda and then extending another 400' south of Loma Linda and then transitioning to four lanes) would impact the design of this route, advising that the City has invested approximately $1/2 million in the design with six lanes to Via Gilberto and that the changing of this design would greatly impact the plans as well as the budget. Mr. Hughes relayed staff's R:\Minutes\010901 20 opinion that the six lanes to Wolf Valley Road would more than double the capacity imagined necessary and, therefore, would not be necessary. In response to Councilman Naggar, Deputy City Manager Thornhill advised that the Planning Commission was not in agreement with Public Works Director Hughes' opinion with regard to the four lanes versus six lanes but also stated that the Planning Commission, at the time of review, did not have information available with regard to completed work and design parameters of the road. For Planning Commissioner Mathewson, Public Works Director Hughes advised that because the developer has agreed to construct the sound wall, the construction of it would not be impacted by the construction of a four lane or six lane route. City Council straw votes with regard to the following issues Four lanes or six lanes There was concurrence for a four-lane route as long as the sound wall be constructed Deer Hollow Road There was concurrence for the developer to provide an all-weather access to the sports park with a minimum of two lanes, possibly four, with no relief of four lanes out on Pain Road and half width if the high school were not constructed. 6.0-acre park not a 6.5 acre-park There was concurrence with the correction. Fire Station There was concurrence that the interim issue would only be proposed in the event something were to occur that would delay the permanent facility; that the developer would agree to pay for the cost of manning the station and associated costs with improvements; that stafCs commitment would be to construct the Fire Station on time. Mr. Griffith concurred with the interim obligation of a Fire Station with the proviso that designing of the station immediately commence. Development Agreement Term There was concurrence that the term would be 10 years from the date of issuance of the first permit or 24 months from the time approved. Transportation Uniform Mitiqation Fee There was concurrence with the $200 per unit requirement and, thereby, satisfying the requirement for Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan, public art, and open space. Community Facilities District It was noted by Mayor Comerchero to support working with the developer to form a CFD but that approval cannot be guaranteed. Mr. Griffith noted that the City Council's best efforts would be acceptable. No objections were noted. R:\Minutes\010901 21 Level of Service D Key issue included La Paz and Bedford Court and removing the issue from the Development Agreement and imposing it as a condition. Councilman Naggar noted that by doing so, it would assist the developer with procuring financing for the CFD. Parkway Maintenance City or Homeowners Association It was noted that by accepting the parkway maintenance, a cost would be created as would a potential liability (anything over a ~" rise or differential would be considered a trip hazard) and that this type of an amenity should be funded, especially in Specific Plans, by the parties benefiting from it. In response to Mayor Comerchero, Community Services Director Parker advised that including parkway maintenance in Service Level C Rates and Charges would not be the norm and that such costs are usually the obligation of the homeowners association. There was concurrence that the parkway maintenance obligation be imposed upon the homeowners association. Reclaimed water It was noted that reclaimed water would be used if the infrastructure were available. MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to continue this matter to the January 23, 2001, City Council meeting. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. COUNCIL BUSINESS 14 Spring Concert on the Green at the Temecula Duck Pond RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Consider allocation $12,000 to the Aris Council of Temecula Valley to provide a Spring Classical Concert on the Green at the Temecula Duck Pond on May 13, 2001. Although supporting the concert, Councilman Naggar relayed a concern with the amount of money allocated in light of the number of people that actually attend and, therefore, suggested the advertising of a donation/contribution. Advising that numerous residents have expressed a desire for the return of the Philharmonic Orchestra, Councilman Stone viewed the proposed allocation as a nominal amount in an effort to support the Arts. Viewing Councilman Naggar's suggestion as a well-intentioned one, Mayor Comerchero suggested that the onus of advertising a donation/contribution should be on the Arts Council. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Roberts moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. R:\Minutes\010901 22 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT No comments. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT City Attorney Thorson advised that there were no reportable items and that the real property negotiations would be forwarded to the City Council in public session for final approval. ADJOURNMENT At 12:15 A.M. on Wednesday, January 10, 2001, the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, January 16, 2001, at 5:30 P.M., for the purpose of a Fifth RCIP Workshop and a Joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting, in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:\Minutes\010901 23 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED WORKSHOP MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 16, 2001 The City Council convened in an adjourned workshop meeting at 5:34 P.M., on Tuesday, January 16, 2001, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Present: Councilmembers: Naggar, Pratt, Stone*, and Roberts Absent: Councilmember: Comerchero. * - Councilman Stone arrived at 5:58 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS There were no City Council Reports. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1 Fifth Workshop for the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP) RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Receive and file. Briefing the purpose of the meeting, City Manager Nelson introduced Mr. Jim Henderson, Project Manager, who provided a status update with regard to the components of the Integrated Project, referencing the following: · General Plan Alternative No. 3 - provides greatest degree of community separation around the City of Temecula Area Plans - have been completed and finalized after the completion of the modeling for the transportation element to ensure a match between transportation and land use Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan - Alternative No. I - most aggressive plan of the alternatives for the MSHCP - conservation of up to 164 species, including conservation within the County and those already in public ownership · Local control · Securing open space · Permits · Predictable in the development process Timeframe · Public review process of the General Plan will begin 11/01 · Funding and implementation R:'~linutes\011601 1 Community and Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP) o Detailed analysis will proceed o Transit oasis o Banning/Beaumont Corridor to Temecula'Alternative Evaluation Chart · Referencing specifics of the corridor such as environmental/other constraints, land use consideration, evaluation process · Clinton Keith Road will be a challenge because of the environmental concerns/wildlife agencies o Hemet to Corona/Lake Elsinore Alternative Evaluation Chart · Referencing specific of the corridor such as environmental/other constraints, land use consideration, evaluation process Because Clinton Keith Road is a key portion of the corridor, Councilman Naggar questioned what the impact would be if it were not approved to which Mr. Henderson noted that options will have to be explored and that the County will have to make decisions. Mr. Henderson advised that he would keep the City Council apprised of the issue. City Manager Nelson advised that staff is, as well, tracking this particular project. Strongly favoring the retention of Clinton Keith Road on the Alternative Evaluation Chart because it would be the furthest south route between Winchester and 1-215 freeway, Mayor Pro Tern Roberts stated that although significant environmental issues exist, options for Clinton Keith Road need to be explored. Addressing other alternatives such as 5a (Eastern Bypass/Pourroy/SR-79, 5b (Eastern Bypass/Pourroy/Rainbow), and 6b (Eastern Bypass/Washington/SR-79) which may as well have significant impacts, Mayor Pro Tern Roberts commented on associated environmental impacts and the impact on the quality of life of the residents in the unincorporated area. In response to Mayor Pro Tern Roberts, Director of Planning and Programming Bechtel noted that the evaluation process of the various alternatives is in the early stages and that the County is aware that the area along SR-79 and Clinton Keith Road will be difficult to resolve. Mr. Ed Stater, County Transportation Department, advised that the potential conflicts with regard to Clinton Keith Road have been identified by the Fish and Wildlife Service. Proceeding with an overview of the transit oasis concept, Mr. Stater noted the following: · Derived through the CETAP process · Tailored specifically to Riverside County · Increased the catchment area by increasing a feeder system near an express station such as rail service, express bus service, transit stops, and commuter rail service · Winchester Road, as well as downtown Riverside, has been identified as a potential location for early implementation In response to Councilman Pratt, Mr. Starer noted that the transit oasis will be incorporated into the 10-year Strategic Plan for Riverside Transit Authority (RTA) as well as the 30-year strategic plan for implementation but that he would foresee the above-mentioned concepts to be included in the five-year plan. Councilman Pratt commented on the need for public transportation and noted that the entire plan should be executed within the next five years and that it could be financed through a public/private partnership with the auto industry. R:\Minutes\011601 2 Concurring with Councilman Pratt's recommendation to execute the plan within the next five years, Mayor Pro Tern Roberts noted that the City of Temecula is a unique situation because of its distance from other locations and commented on RTA alternatives, express way bus service to San Diego, and SMART Shuttle in the City. Viewing Councilman Pratt's comments as valid, Councilman Stone noted that in order to make desired projects come to fruition, part of the CETAP and General Plan process should include exploring funding sources from the State/Federal governments. In an effort to attain public transportation for all cities/counties in the State of California, Councilman Stone encouraged paralleling strong lobbying efforts and suggested the formulation, by the City Attorney, of a generic initiative to ensure State/Federal funding resources for all cities/counties for such projects. Mr. Starer, echoed by Ms. Bechtel, noted that an extensive lobbying program for the overall project is in place. Councilman Naggar noted that the State allocated $6 billion toward road and freeway improvements, noting that nominal funds were distributed to this region. Mr. Naggar concurred that stronger efforts must be undertaken to ensure greater allocation to this region. Advising that the evaluation process of this project includes the review of transit issues as well as environmental issues, Mr. Henderson noted that CETAP efforts should be completed and ready for the public arena by the Fall; that the transit oasis concept would precede that process; and that RCIP representatives would revisit the City Council in approximately three months. Mayor Pro Tem Roberts suggested that Councilman Stone and he discuss and coordinate the efforts of a possible initiative as suggested by Mr. Stone. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT No comments. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT No comments. ADJOURNMENT At 6:38 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, January 16, 2001, at 7:00 P.M., for the purpose of Joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ATTEST: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:'W1inutes\011601 3 ITEM 3 RESOLUTION NO. 0t- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $3,835,984.03. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 27th day of March, 2001. ATTEST: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:/Resos2001/Resos 01- 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 01- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 27th day of March, 2001 by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:/Resos2001/Resos 01- 2 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 03/01/01 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 03/08/01 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 03/15/01 TOTAL CHECK I~UN: 03/27/01 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 03/01/01 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 03/15/01 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 03/27181 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 165 190 192 193 194 195 210 261 280 3O0 32O 330 340 46O 470 GENERAL FUND RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D TCSD SERVICE LEVEL R CAPITAL iMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP INSURANCE FUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES CFD 88-12 DEBT SVC FUND CFD 9~1 DEBT SVC FUND 100 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY~IP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES TOTAL BY FUND: S~AWN'~ELSON, CI~ ~NAGER 600,358.13 399,428.53 1,280.508.83 222,786.34 218,804.41 $ 3,835,984.03 1,349,065.05 186,456.18 30,688.48 47,027.03 765.69 1,985.00 139,761.82 364.50 664,342.62 98,661.04 44,410.56 13,519.52 15,663.53 444,765.86 345.660.56 318,208.47 75,059.37 122.81 1,043.90 3,811.58 1.529.19 15,001.80 4.063.37 8,488.95 $ 3,394,393.28 441,590.75 $ 3,835.984.03 , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 14 03/01/01 13:03 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA OEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 195 TESD SERVICE LEVEL R 210 CAPITAL IHPROVEHENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPHENT AGENCY - 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES 460 CFD 88-12 DEBT SERVICE FUND 470 CFD 98-1 DEBT SERVICE FUND AMOUNT 181,447.43 3,143.29 45,064.04 45.23 6,734.25 422.19 935.00 61,297.~ 2,555.84 7,840.51 1,980.12 5,042.53 444,765.86 345,660.56 TOTAL 1,114,097.79 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1 03/01/01 13:03 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 10228 02/28/01 003228 U S BANK TRUST NATIONAL 30101 03/01/01 000245 30101 03/01/01 000245 30101 03/01/01 000245 30101 03/01/01 000245 30101 03/01/01 000245 30101 03/01/01 000245 30101 03/01/01 000245 30101 03/01/01 000245 30101 03/01/01 000245 30101 03/01/01 000245 30101 03/01/01 000245 30101 03/01/01 000245 30101 03/01/01 000245 30101 03/01/01 000245 30101 03/01/01 000245 30101 03/01/01 000245 30101 03/01/01 000245 30101 03/01/01 000245 30101 03/01/01 000245 30101 03/01/01 000245 30101 03/01/01 000245 30101 03/01/01 000245 30101 03/01/01 000245 30101 03/01/01 000245 30101 03/01/01 000245 30101 03/01/01 000246 30101 03/01/01 000246 30101 03/01/01 000246 30101 03/01/01 000246 30101 03/01/01 000246 30101 03/01/01 000246 30101 03/01/01 000246 30101 03/01/01 000246 30101 03/01/01 000246 30101 03/01/01 000246 30101 03/01/01 000246 30101 03/01/01 000246 30101 03/01/01 000246 30101 03/01/01 000246 30101 03/01/01 000246 30101 03/01/01 000246 30101 03/01/01 000246 30101 03/01/01 000246 30101 03/01/01 000246 30101 03/01/01 000246 30101 03/01/01 000246 30101 03/01/01 000246 30101 03/01/01 000246 30101 03/01/01 000246 PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSOR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS ~EALTH INSUR. PRE PERS iHEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS ~EALTH INSUR. PRE PERS 4EALTH INSUR. PRE PERS 4EALTN INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PRES EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PRES EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE CFD 88-12 DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT 460-1040 444,765.86 000245 AETNA 001-2090 3,042.39 000245 AETNA 165-2090 254.63 000245 AETNA 190-2090 1,142.00 000245 AETNA 280-2090 84.8? 000245 AETNA 330-2090 97.00 000245 AETNA 340-2090 244.06 000245 8LSHIELD 001-2090 1,594.12 000245 BLSHIELD 190-2090 468.53 000245 CIGNA 001-2090 890.72 000245 HELTHNET 001-2090 4,804.09 000245 HELTHHET 190-2090 1,398.91 000245 HELTHRET 193-2090 98.63 000245 HELTHNET 194-2090 29.59 000245 HELTHNET 340-2090 768.95 000245 KAISER 001-2090 2,120.00 000245 PACCARE 001-2090 4,149.17 000245 PACCAHE 190-2090 769.84 000245 PAGCARE 193-2090 244.62 000245 PACCARE 340-2090 144.45 000245 PC 001-2090 738.00 000245 PERS CHO 001-2090 4,056.44 000245 PERS DED 001-2090 1 015.63 000245 PERS-ADM 001-2090 199.25 000245 UNI 001-2090 2,037.16 000245 UN! 190-2090 166.98 000246 PERS RET 001-2390 26,975.40 000246 PERS RET 165-2390 651.49 000246 PERS HET 190-2390 4,846.80 000246 PERS RET 192-2390 11.61 000246 PERS RET 193'2390 471.21 000246 PERS RET 194'2390 98.49 000246 PERS RET 280-2390 282.59 000246 PERS RET 300-2390 127.82 000246 PERS RET 320-2130 26.51 000246 PERS RET 320-2390 1,054.89 000246 PRES RET 330-2390 206.19 000246 PERS RET 340-2390 588.72 000246 PERS-PRE 001-2130 140.96 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390 97.52 000246 SURVIVOR 165-2390 1.87 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390 18.89 000246 SURVIVOR 192-2390 .05 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390 2.00 000246 SURVIVOR 194-2390 .36 000246 SURVIVOR 280-2390 .92 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390 .46 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390 3.72 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390 1.39 000246 SURVIVOR 340-2390 2.65 444,765.86 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 03/01/01 13:03 VOUCBER/CRECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 30101 67694 67695 67696 67697 67698 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 02/22/01 02/26/01 02/26/01 02/26/01 02/26/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 IBSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000444 INSTATAX (EDB) 000444 INBTATAX (ROD) 000444 INBTATAX (EDD) 000444 INBTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INBTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDO) 000444 INBTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (ROD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INBTATAX (ROD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INBTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 004426 VINTAGE FRIENDS 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER SOUDERw JIM KENDALL, JUDY 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & RE 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SOl 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 BDI 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 0O0444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE TOMBSTONES:EVERY 15 MIN PGRM XX-6165 YATES:TEAM BUILD-EXECU SISTER CITIES SPNSRSHP - JAPAN SISTER CITIES SPNSRSHP-VOURBUR NTC DETERMINATION:MURRIETA CRK 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 193-2070 280-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-170-999-5371 001-150-999-5260 001-101-999-5280 001-101-999-5280 210~165-707~5804 26,644.63 469.59 5,430.00 15.54 383.12 128.78 179.59 74.25 1,049.19 257.84 590.69 6,262.38 152.28 1,391.77 2.60 112.25 22.11 69.35 29.24 270.66 67.84 152.60 102.26 4.06 87.11 1.89 .87 7,51 6.51 2.10 7,177.41 132.95 1~255.94 4.61 86.29 38.42 53.73 15.32 220.13 58.15 135.94 330.00 2,206.00 2,000.00 3,600.00 78.00 119,320.04 330.00 2,206.00 2,000.00 3,600.00 78.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 3 03/01/01 13:03 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 67699 02/26/01 62700 03/01/01 999999 02/28/01 000 00/00/00 000 00/00/00 000 00/00/00 000 00/00/00 000 00/00/00 000 00/00/00 000 00/00/00 000 00/00/00 000 00/00/00 000 00/00/00 000 00/00/00 000 00/00/00 000 00/00/00 000 00/00/00 000 00/00/00 000 00/00/00 000 00/00/00 67703 03/01/01 67703 03/01/01 67703 03/01/01 67703 03/01/01 67703 03/01/01 67703 03/01/01 67703 03/01/01 6~03 03/01/01 67703 03/01/01 67703 03/01/01 67-/03 03/01/01 67703 03/01/01 67-/03 03/01/01 6~03 03/01/01 67-/04 03/01/01 67704 03/01/01 6~04 03/01/01 67704 03/01/01 67704 03/01/01 67704 03/01/01 67704 03/01/01 67704 03/01/01 67705 03/01/01 67706 03/01/01 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 002072 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST OSORIO, HOLLIE & MANUEL 003228 U S BANK TRUST NATIONAL ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUMBER WATER METER FEE:IST ST BRIDGE RELEASE CLAIMS AGREEMENT PMT 280-199-807-5804 300-199-999-5207 CFD 98-1 DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT 470-1040 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 000245 PERB (HEALTH INBUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTNNET 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISER 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS REV 003552 F L A C 003552 F L A C 003552 F L A C 003552 F L A C 003552 A L A C 003552 A F L A C 003552 A L A C 003552 A L A C 003552 A L A C 003552 A L A C 003552 A L A C 003552 A L A C 003552 A L A C 003552 A L A C 003552 CANCER 003552 CANCER 003552 CANCER 003552 CANCER 003552 CANCER 003552 EXP PROT 003552 EXP PROT 003552 EXP PROT 003552 HOSP IC 003552 STD 003552 STD 003552 STD 003552 STD 003552 STD 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP RED CROSS PROCESS FEES ADD'T LICENSE FEES 1/01-11/01 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS 003520 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COM 001-2090 165-2090 190-2090 280-2090 340-2090 001-2090 190-2090 001-2090 001-2090 190-2090 340-2090 001-2090 001-2090 190-2090 340-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2330 190-2330 193-2330 194-2330 340-2330 001-2330 190-2330 320-2330 001-2330 001-2330 190-2330 193-2330 194-2330 340-2330 001-2310 165-2310 190-2310 193-2310 194-2310 280-2310 330-2310 340-2310 190-186-999-5261 280-199-999-5362 ITEM AMOUNT 4,189.00 1,500.00 345,660.56 258.61 123.68 119.00 41.22 8.14 55.47 54.51 35.78 143.43 31.24 .36 23.43 119.46 5.42 2.32 93.56 1,115.63- 357.70 14.35 14.35 4.79 14.31 156.20 55.80 27.90 17.50 654.40 155.20 9.60 3.20 20.80 729.49 17.60 89.03 5.58 1.68 5.86 5.58 42.23 20.00 42.44 CHECK AMOUNT 4,189.00 1,500.00 345,660.56 .00 1,506.10 897.05 20.00 42.44 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4 03/01/01 13:03 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 67707 67707 67708 67708 67709 6~710 67710 67711 67711 67712 67713 67714 67715 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 03/01/01 004316 AN WIL BAG COMPANY 03/01/01 004316 AN WIL BAG COMPANY 03/01/01 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. 03/01/01 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. 03/01/01 000122 B S N SPORTS 03/01/01 004262 BIO-TOX LABORATORIES 03/01/01 004262 BIO-TOX LABORATORIES 03/01/01 003817 BLUE RIDGE MEDICAL 03/01/01 003817 BLUE RIDGE MEDICAL 03/01/01 004380 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 03/01/01 004176 BROADWING 03/01/01 003582 BROWN JR., WILLIAM E. 03/01/01 BRUMMER, CAROLYN 67716 03/01/01 BUFFETS INC. 67717 67717 67718 67718 6~18 67718 67718 6?718 67718 67718 67718 67718 67718 67718 67718 67718 67718 67718 67718 67718 67718 67718 67718 67718 03/01/01 003567 C C MYERS INC 03/01/01 003567 C C MYERS INC 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 67720 003553 C G N A 003553 C G N A 003553 C G N A 003553 C G N A 003553 C G N A 003553 C G N A 003553 C G N A 003553 G G N A 003553 C G N A 003553 C G N A 003553 C G N A 003553 C G N A 003553 C G N A 003553 G G N A 003553 C G N A 003553 C G N A 003553 C G N A 003553 C G N A 003553 C G N A 003553 C G N A 003553 C G N A 003553 C G N A 000154 C S M F 0 ITEM DESCRIPTION ASPHALT-COLD PATCHS:PW MNTC SALES TAX TEHP HELP W/E 02/10 BRUNER TEMP HELP W/E 02/03 SIMPKINS TEEN GAME AREA SUPPLIES:CRC LAB DRUG TESTING:POLICE/CHP LAB DRUG TESTING:POLICE/CHP PARAMEDIC SQUAD SUPPLIES:FIRE PARAMEDIC SQU~ SUPPLIES:FIRE 00-01COMM SVC FUNDING AWARD LONG DISTANCE & INTERNET SVCS MILEAGE REIMB P/E 02/22/01 REFUND:BABYBLASTERB MOMMY & ME ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-164-601-5218 001-164-601-5218 001-162-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 190-182-999-5301 001-170-999-5328 001-170-999-5328 001-171-999-5311 001-171-999-5311 001-101-999~5267 320-199-999-5208 001-164-602-5262 190-183-4982 REFD GRADING DEPST:LDOO-126GR 001-2670 DEC PRGSS:OVRLD OVRCRS PW95-11 RETENTION:OVRLD OVRCRS PW95-11 210-165-604-5804 210-2035 ITEM ~JqOUNT 595.00 44.63 202.56 351.00 24.14 789.50 605.50 284.73 122.55 2,500.00 1,195.00 69.00 25.00 995.00 390.00 39.00- 003553 LTD 001-2380 1,623.26 003553 LTD 165-2380 39.10 003553 LTD 190-2380 296.47 003553 LTD 192-2380 .71 003553 LTD 193-2380 29.82 003553 LTD 194-2380 6.08 003553 LTD 280-2380 17.29 003553 LTD 300-2380 7.99 003553 LTD 320-2380 66.99 003553 LTD 330-2380 13.45 003553 LTD 340-2380 37.68 003553 STD 001-2500 2,265.79 003553 STD 165-2500 54.57 003553 STD 190-2500 413.84 003553 STD 192-2500 .99 003553 STD 193-2500 41.61 003553 STD 194-2500 8.49 003553 STD 280-2500 24.15 003553 STD 300-2500 11.15 003553 STD 320-2500 93.49 003553 STD 330-2500 18.78 003553 STD 340-2500 52.60 JAN ADVERTISEMENT:ACCOUNTANT 001-150-999-5254 144.00 CHECK AMOUNT 639.63 553.56 24.14 1,395.00 407.28 2,500.00 1,195.00 69.00 25.00 995.00 351.00 5,124.30 144.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 5 03/01/01 13:03 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ' VOUCNER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 67721 67721 6~722 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 004451 CA AUTOMATIC FIRE ALARM 004451 CA AUTOMATIC FIRE ALARM 000398 CALIF MUNICIPAL TREASUR FIRE SYS TEST/INSPECT:3/19/01 INTER FIRE ALARM SEM:3/20-22 ANNUL MEMBERSHIP:GENIE ROBERTS 001-171-999-5261 001-171-999-5261 001-140-999-5226 435.00 ~70.00 120.00 1,205.00 120.00 67723 67724 67725 67725 67'/25 67725 67725 67725 6~725 67725 67725 67725 6~725 67726 67727 67727 67728 67729 67730 67731 67731 67731 67732 67732 67732 67732 6~732 677'32 67733 67733 67734 67734 67735 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 CALIF PLANNING & DEVELO 001183 CALIF REGIONAL WATER QU BKS:REGIONAL CITY/LIVABLE CITY PERMIT FEE:LOW-FLOV @ VIA MONT 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 002534 CATERERS CAFE CAZAREZ, RAMON CAZAREZ, RAMON 001249 CENTRE FOR ORG EFFECTIV 003047 CHAPARRAL HIGH SCHOOL - REFSHMNTS:CM BUSINESS MTG REFUND: OVRPMT FEES B01-0358 REFUND: OVRPMT FEES B01-0358 MGMT ACADEMY:AARON ADAMS:5/14 PERFORMANCE IN OLD TWN 12/2 004203 CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTIO 004203 AR CHILD 004017 COMERCHERO, JEFF 004017 COMERCHERO, JEFF 004017 COMERCHERO, JEFF REIMB:CALED CF:11/29-30/01 REIMB:NAT~L LEAGUE:12/5-10/O0 REIMB:RAIL-VOLUTION CF:10/3-7 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CRC 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET COSTELLO, SEVERIO A SERVICE CALL - CRC SERVICE CALL - CITY HALL INSTALL MIC WEATHER BOX W/MIC SALES TAX REFUND: BABYLOVE MOMMY & ME 001-161-999-5228 210-165-707-5804 001-2360 165-2360 190-2360 192-2360 193-2360 194-2360 280-2360 300-2360 320-2360 330-2360 340-2360 001-110-999-5260 001-162-4200 001-162-4285 001-110-999-5261 280-199-999-5362 190-2140 001-100-999-5258 001-100-999-5258 001-1270 001-2120 190-2120 193-2120 194-2120 330-2120 340-2120 190-182-999-5250 340-199-701-5250 001-164-601-5215 001-164-601-5215 190-183-4982 81.92 500.00 645.13 13.01 131.96 .33 13.98 2.59 6.49 3.24 26.00 9.75 18.52 34.68 6.75 9.00 2,000.00 150.00 123.67 5.49 31.11 21.18 118.50 5.60 .60 .20 5.50 .60 75.00 75.00 371.98 5.40 25.00 81.92 500.00 871.00 34.68 15.75 2,000.00 150.00 123.67 57.78 131.00 150.00 377.38 25.00 VOUCHRE2 03/01/01 13:03 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 6 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION HUMBER 67736 03/01/01 67756 03/01/01 67736 03/01/01 677'57 03/01/01 67737 03/01/01 67738 03/01/01 002900 DANIEL MANN JOHNSON 002900 DANIEL MANN JOHNSON 002900 DANIEL MANN JOHNSON 004222 DIAMOND BACK FIRE & RES 004222 DIAMOND BACK FIRE & RES 004438 DICK BLICK ART MATERIAL 67739 03/01/01 001380 67739 03/01/01 001380 67739 03/01/01 001380 67739 03/01/01 001380 67739 03/01/01 001380 67T59 03/01/01 001380 67~'59 03/01/01 001380 67739 03/01/01 001380 67739 03/01/01 001380 67739 03/01/01 001380 67739 03/01/01 001380 67740 03/01/01 67/40 03/01/01 67741 03/01/01 67741 03/01/01 67741 03/01/01 67741 03/01/01 67741 03/01/01 67741 03/01/01 67741 03/01/01 67741 03/01/01 67741 03/01/01 67741 03/01/01 67741 03/01/01 67/41 03/01/01 67741 03/01/01 67741 03/01/01 67741 03/01/01 67741 03/01/01 67741 03/01/01 67741 03/01/01 67741 03/01/01 67741 03/01/01 67741 03/01/01 67742 03/01/01 67742 03/01/01 67/42 03/01/01 67742 03/01/01 67742 03/01/01 E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERIN 002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERIN 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS OCT DESIGN SVC:PALA RD PHASEII 210-165-668-5802 NOV DESIGN SVC:PALA RD PHASEII 210-165-668-5802 DEC DESIGN SVC:PALA RD PHASEII 210-165-668-5802 LIFT AIR BAG SET:STATION 84 SALES TAX 001-171-999-5610 001-171-999-5610 MUSEUM ART SUPPLIES TEMP HELP W/E 02/09 RUSH TEMP HELP W/E 02/09 EBON TEMP HELP W/E 02/09 EBON TEMP HELP W/E 02/09 HANSEH TEMP HELP N/E 02/09 HANSEN TEMP HELP N/E 02/09 HANSEN TEMP HELP N/E 02/09 THURSTON TEMP HELP N/E 02/09 BROWN TEMP HELP N/E 02/09 VOSHALL TEMP HELP W/E 02/09 OBMANN TEMP HELP N/E 02/09 HERR 190-185'999-5301 001-161'999-5118 340-199-701-5118 340-199-702-5118 190'180'999-5118 001'161-999'5118 001-120-999-5118 190'186'999-5118 001'164-604-5118 001-161-999-5118 001-171-999-5118 001'162'999'5118 REFRESNMENTS:OP BUDGET WKSHOP 001-140-999-5260 SALES TAX 001-140-999-5260 AUG LDSCP REPAIR:SOLANA NAY NOV LDSCP REPAIRS:VIA EDUARDO JAN LDSCP REPAIR:TEMEKU HILLS JAN LDSCP REPAIR:TEMEKU HILLS JAN LDSCP REPAIR:MARGARITA MED JAN LDSCP REPAIR:JOHN MAGEE PK JAN LDSCP REPAIR:SPORTS PARK 193-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 JAN LDSCP REPAIR:WINCHESTER CK 193-180-999-5212 JAN LDSCP REPAIR:PAVILLION POI 193-180-999-5212 JAN LDSCP REPAIR:P.D.S.VALVE 190-180-999-5212 JAN LDSCP REPAIRS:SPTS PRK 190-180-999-5212 JAN LDSCP REPAIR:WINCHESTER CK 193-180-999-5416 JAN LDSCP REPAIR:RUSTIC GLEN JAN LDSCP REPAIR:RUSTIC GLEN JAN LDSCP REPAIR:RUSTIC GLEN JAN LDSCP REPAIR:RUSTIC GLEN JAN LDSCP REPAIR:RUSTIC GLEN JAN LDSCP REPAIR:RUSTIC GLEN JAN LDBCP REPAIR:RUSTIC GLEN JAN LDSCP REPAIR:MARGARITA PK JAN LDSCP REPAIR:MARGARITA PK 193-180-999-5416 193-180-999-5416 193-180-999-5416 193-180-999-5416 193-180-999-5416 193-180-999-5416 193-180-999-5416 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-150-999-5230 001-1990 001-163-999-5230 001-164-604-5230 190-180-999-5230 ITEM AMOUNT 15,216.69 8,464.36 3,320.67 2,750.00 206.25 166.52 1,768.86 853.80 284.60 254.25 1,098.36 274.59 1,319.04 4,3~3.46 2~075.20 1,349.71 1,829.12 187.65 13.51 200.13 220.93 35.00 80.00 155.03 105.62 203.78 175.06 45.66 230.51 191.26 300.00 255.00 360.00 225.00 990.00 144.00 225.00 ?5.00 1,800.00 140.00 12.92 38.97 12.92 11.96 20.75 CHECK AMOUNT 27,001.72 2,956.25 166.52 15,480.99 201.16 6,156.98 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 7 03/01/01 13:05 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 67742 67742 67742 67742 67742 67743 67744 67745 67746 67747 67747 67-/48 67749 67750 67750 67751 67752 67753 67754 67755 67755 67755 67755 67755 67755 67755 67755 67755 67755 67755 67755 67755 67755 6~56 67756 67757 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 03/01/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS IRC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-110-999-5230 03/01/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS IRC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 280-199-999-5230 03/01/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-150-999-5230 03/01/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-110-999-5230 03/01/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAiL SERVICES 001-1270 03/01/01 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO LOT BOOK REPT:ANAYA 165-199-999-5250 03/01/01 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS INC MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES-INFO SY 320-199-999-5221 03/01/01 000795 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS NON-FiNANCIAL PEOPLE SEM:4/18 001-171-999-5261 03/01/01 000795 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS GREAT COMMUNICATOR SEM:4/04/01 001-171-999-5261 03/01/01 004178 FREEDOM SIGNS CNG BANNER LOGO:RACE FOR CURE 001-111-999-5271 03/01/01 004178 FREEDOM SIGNS SALES TAX 001-111-999-5271 03/01/01 FULLERTON POLICE DEPT MBSHP/REGISTRATION:OFCR MORIN 001-170-999-5261 05/01/01 001937 GALLS INC ROLATAPE FOR FIRE PREV iNSPECT 001-171-999-5242 03/01/01 003592 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION DEC PRGSS:PALA BRIDGE PW97-15 210-165-631-5804 03/01/01 003592 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION RETENTION ADJT TO TOTAL BILLED 210-2035 05/01/01 003676 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION-ES REL RETENTION ?0 ESCROW-PALA 210-1035 03/01/01 GRAY, PATRICIA REFUND: BABYLOVE MOMMY & ME 190-183-4982 03/01/01 000378 HAFELI, TROMAS PRINTER FOR J.STONE:HP 842C 320-199-999-5242 03/01/01 HAMPTON INN & SUITES ROOM FOR NATL APA CF:3/9-14/01 001-161-999-5258 03/01/01 002107 HIGHMARK IRC 002107 VL REVER 001-2510 03/01/01 002107 HIGHMARK IRC 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 03/01/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 03/01/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LiFE 193-2510 03/01/01 002107 HIGH~RK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 194-2510 03/01/01 002107 HIGHMARK IRC 002107 VOL LIFE 300-2510 03/01/01 002107 HIGHMARK IRC 002107 VOL LiFE 340-2510 03/01/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VL ADVAN 001-2510 03/01/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LiFE 001-2510 03/01/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 03/01/01 002107 HIGHMARX INC 002107 VOL LIFE 193-2510 03/01/01 002107 BIGRMARK IRC 002107 VOL LiFE 194-2510 03/01/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LiFE 300-2510 03/01/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LiFE 340-2510 03/01/01 001158 HOLIDAY iNN HTL:CPRS CF:3/14-17:TCSD STAFF 190-180-999-5258 03/01/01 001158 HOLIDAY INN RTL:CPRS CF:3/14-17:TCSD STAFF 190-1990 03/01/01 HUNTINGTON LIBRARY ADMIN FOR MUSEUM EXCURSION 190-183-999-5350 iTEM AMOUNT 18.52 12.92 25.84 17.53 23.71 150.00 801.89 318.00 318.00 85.00 6.59 130.00 117.16 29,860.33 4,957.05- 4,957.05 25.00 128.99 1,002.40 215.30- 194.80 11.87 2.22 .74 .80 4.87 215.30 194.80 11.87 2.22 .74 .80 4.87 2,535.27 1,820.25 280.00 CHECK AMOUNT 196.04 150.00 801.89 318.00 318.00 91.59 130.00 117.16 24,903.28 4,957.05 25.00 128.99 1,002.40 430.60 4,355.52 280.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 8 03/01/01 13:03 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 67758 67758 67758 67758 67758 67758 67758 67759 67760 67761 67762 67762 67763 67763 67764 67765 67766 67766 67766 67767 67768 67769 67770 67771 67771 67771 677~ 67772 67773 67773 67774 67774 67774 67774 67774 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUB 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS J. PAUL GETTY TRUST, TH 004079 JENKENS & GILCHRIST 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE KIBLINGER, GEORGENE KIBLINGER, GEORGENE 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS 000945 L P S COMPUTER SERVICE 000945 L P S COMPUTER SERVICE 000945 L P B COMPUTER SERVICE 001534 LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV LAMBS FELLOWSHIP~ THE MAD MADELINE'S GRILL 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS 004141 MAINTEX INC 004141 MAINTEX INC 004141 MAINTEX INC 004107 MASSA-LAVITT, SANDRA 004107 MASSA-LAVITT~ BANDRA 000944 MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY I 000944 MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY I ITEM DESCRIPTION 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMp 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMp 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP BUS PRKG:GETTY MUSEUM EXCURSIN JAN GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES CLEAN HOT AIR BALLOON BANNERS TEMP HELP W/E 02/11 CARPENTER TEMP HELP W/E 02/11JAUREGUI ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2080 165-2080 190-2080 193-2080 194-2080 280-2080 300-2080 190-183-999-5350 001-130-999-5247 001-111-999-5271 001-161-999~5118 001-140-999-5118 REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 LESS: KITCHEN FEES 190-183-4990 REPAIR CHAMBERS HEATING SYSTEM MISC POOL SUPPLIES - CRC HP PRINTER SUPPLIES RP PRINTER SUPPLIES NP PRINTER SUPPLIES 340-199-701-5250 190-186-999-5212 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 AIR:CPRS CF:3/14-17:TCSB STAFF 190-1990 REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 FACADE IMPRV PRGM:MAD MADELINE SUPPLIES FOR STREET SIGNS CRC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES CRC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 1/30-2/14/01 CONSULTING SVCS 1/16-1/26/01 CONSULTING SVCS TRAF DIV SIGNAL MAINT SUPPLIES TRAF DIV SIGNAL MAINT SUPPLIES 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 280-199-813-5804 001-164-601-5244 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 340-199-701-5212 001-161-999-5248 001-161-999-5248 001-164-602-5242 001-164-602-5242 001-2340 165-2340 190-2340 193-2340 194-2340 ITEM AMOUNT 2,780.75 445.85 449.05 40.00 16.51 166.79 50.00 100.00 288.00 180.81 422.40 184.80 100.00 32.00- 548.00 63.05 203.18 529.02 380.42 817.50 100.00 276.93 1,338.38 59.51 39.51 39.50 3,250.85 329.94 16.46 335.07 3,886.27 200.93 680.30 68.38 5.44 CHECK AMOUNT 3,948.95 100.00 288.00 180.81 607.20 68.00 548.00 63.05 1,112.62 817.50 100.00 276.93 1,338.38 138.52 3,580.79 351.53 VOUCHRE2 03/01/01 13:03 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 67774 03/01/01 67/-/4 03/01/01 67774 03/01/01 67775 03/01/01 677-/5 03/01/01 67776 03/01/01 67777 03/01/01 67778 03/01/01 67778 03/01/01 67778 03/01/01 67778 03/01/01 67778 03/01/01 67779 03/01/01 67779 03/01/01 67780 03/01/01 67780 03/01/01 67781 03/01/01 67781 03/01/01 67782 03/01/01 67783 03/01/01 67783 03/01/01 67783 03/01/01 67783 03/01/01 67784 03/01/01 67785 03/01/01 67786 03/01/01 67786 03/01/01 67787 03/01/01 67788 03/01/01 67789 03/01/01 67790 03/01/01 67790 03/01/01 67791 03/01/01 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 001905 MEYERS, DAVID WILLIAM 001905 MEYERS, DAVID WILLIAM MILLER~ ILENE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS REFUND:BABYBLASTERS MOMMY & ME 003163 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEM 1/23/01-1/22/02 CRC MNTC AGRMN 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 HINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING 004199 NORTH COUNTY PUMP SERVI 004199 NORTH COUNTY PUMP SERVI 002100 002105 002105 002105 002105 003116 004045 002652 002652 003218 003218 001958 NORTHSTAR TOOLS, INC. NORTHSTAR TOOLS, INC. OBJECT RADIANCE INC BUSINESS CARDS:C.ADKISSON-FLON BUSINESS CARDS:J.KANIGOWSKI BUSINESS CARDS:JoPELLETIER SALES TAX BUSINESS CARDS:M.HAROLD O.T. STREET WASHING:ROD RUN ROAD GRADING:SANTIAGO/J.WARNER DUCK POND SHAFT SEAL KIT SALES TAX REFUND:PLAN CK/INSPECTION FEES REFUND:PLAN CK/INSPECTION FEES TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE SALES TAX OLDE SAN DIEGO GAZETTE ORVAC ELECTRONICS OSCARS RESTAURANT OSCARS RESTAURANT OTT, WENDELL PALACE STATION PAPABOLOS, GUS PELA PELA PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO NOV-DEC DISPL.ADS:DICKENS HOL. MISC A/V ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT REFRSHMNTS:COUNCIL MTG:2/13/01 SALES TAX REIMB:EXHIBIT TRANSPORTATION HTL:#4BX63:SCHOOL VIOLENCE SEM REIMB:RISK MANAGER CF:2/14-16 DEC-JAN LDSCP PLAN CK SVC:MARG JAN LDBCP INSPECTION:PALA BEG 001958 PRES L-T ACCOUNT NUMBER 280-2340 330-2340 540-2340 190'183'999-5330 190'183-999'5330 190-183-4982 330-199-999-5217 190-180-999-5222 190-180~999-5222 190'180-999'5222 190'180'999'5222 001-162-999-5222 001-16/*-601-5402 195-180-999-5402 190-180-999-5215 190-180-999-5215 001'171'4036 001'171'4037 190'183-999-5330 001-16/*-601-5214 190-180-999-5214 001-162-999-5214 001-162-999-5214 280-199-999-5362 320'199-999'5210 001'100'999-5260 001-100-999-5260 190-185-999-5250 001-170-999-5261 300-199-999-5258 001'165-999-5248 210-165'631-5804 001'2122. ITEM AMOUNT 100.45 18.15 130.60 192.00 96.00 25.00 583.00 38.25 38.25 102.50 13.42 110.19 500.00 935.00 182.00 13.65 643.00 210.00 1,126.40 70.45 132.19 294.33 17.24 1,000.00 55.24 90.7~ 6.81 134.62 192.93 645.49 430.00 709.50 154.60 PAGE 9 CHECK AMOUNT 5,090.52 288.00 25.00 583.00 302.61 1,435.00 195.65 853.00 1,126.40 514.21 1,000.00 55.24 97.56 134.62 192.93 645.49 1,139.50 154.60 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 10 03/01/01 13:03 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 67792 03/01/01 67792 03/01/01 67792 03/01/01 67792 03/01/01 67792 03/01/01 67792 03/01/01 67792 03/01/01 67792 03/01/01 67792 03/01/01 67792 03/01/01 67792 03/01/01 67792 03/01/01 67792 03/01/01 6~92 03/01/01 67792 03/01/01 67792 03/01/01 67792 03/01/01 67792 03/01/01 67793 03/01/01 6~94 03/01/01 67794 03/01/01 6~95 03/01/01 67796 03/01/01 67796 03/01/01 67797 03/01/01 67797 03/01/01 67798 03/01/01 67799 03/01/01 67800 03/01/01 67801 03/01/01 67802 03/01/01 67803 03/01/01 67804 03/01/01 67805 03/01/01 67806 03/01/01 67806 03/01/01 67806 03/01/01 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN 002483 PRO TECH SERVICES/PARTS 002483 PRO TECH SERVICES/PARTS 003687 QUEST ENVIRONMENTAL 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 002654 RANCHO FORD LINCOLN MER 000352 000418 000268 002940 002226 004429 003801 003801 003801 RCC / RCTOA RIVERSIDE CO ASSESSOR RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & RE RIVERSIDE CO HABITAT RIVERSIDE CO OF (GIB SY RUSSO, MARY ANNE SCOTT WILLIAMS MUSIC SELF'S JANITORIAL SERV! SELF'S JANITORIAL SERVI SELFtB JANITORIAL SERVI ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCO(JNT NUMBER PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5320 001-164-601-5250 001-110-999-5260 190~180-999-5250 190-180-999-5260 001-150~999-5265 190-180-999-5260 001-165-999-5260 190-180-999-5263 280-199-999-5260 001-140-999-5260 001-164-602-5261 001-110-999~5260 190-181-999-5301 190-181-999-5301 190-183-999-5350 001-140-999-5261 001-101-999-5280 VAR RECRUITMENT ADS FOR HR DPT 001-150-999-5254 CRC WATER HEATER RELAY BOARD 190-182-999-5212 SALES TAX 190-182-999-5212 REMOVAL OF HAZ-MAT MATERIAL 001-164-601-5430 DUPL BLUEPRINTS:MARG RD:99-01 210-165-706-5801 DUPL SLUEPRINTS:MARG RD:99-01 001-165-999-5250 VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 CITY VEHICLE REPAIR FOR C.M. 001-110-999-5214 FIRE PREVENTION 10:JM:3/2-3/10 001-171-999-5261 ASSESSOR MAPS FOR B&S DEPT 001-162-999-5222 NTC DETERMINATION FEE:VIA MONT 210-165-707-5804 JAN 01 K-RAT PAYMENT 001-2300 GIB CONSULTING SERVICES 001-161-610-5248 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999~5330 ENTERTAINMENT:DICKENS HOL.12/9 280-199-999-5362 FEB CUSTODIAL SVCS:VAR PARKS 190-180-999-5250 FEB CUSTODIAL SVC:OLD TOWN R.R 001-164-603-5250 FEB CUSTODIAL SVCS:AQUATIC FAC 190-1~-999-5212 ITEM AMOUNT 6.44 90.88 31.90 20.00 10.00 25.73 33.00 8.99 32.61 8.99 16.83 15.00 5.25 23.62 2.11 20.00 20.04 48.54 932.13 91.00 6.83 390.00 440.10 388.85 616.79 1,529.49 69.00 95.00 74.00 1,328.00 500.00 380.54 700.00 225.00 3,440.00 210.00 210.00 CHECK AMOUNT 419.93 932.13 97.83 390.00 828.95 2,146.28 69.00 95.00 74.00 1,328.00 500.00 380.54 7OD.OD 225.00 3,860.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 11 03/01/01 13:03 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 67807 03/01/01 000645 SMART & FINAL INC 67807 03/01/01 000645 SMART & FINAL INC FAMILY FUN NIGHT SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5371 SUPPLIES FOR HIGH HOPES PRGM 190-183-999-5320 66.27 61.91 128.18 67808 03/01/01 003477 SMITH, BARBARA 67809 03/01/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 67809 03/01/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 67809 03/01/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 67809 03/01/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 67809 03/01/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 67809 03/01/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 67809 03/01/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 67809 03/01/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 67809 03/01/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 67809 03/01/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 67809 03/01/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 67810 03/01/01 002361 SO CALIF FPOS EMP COMPUTER PRGM: B. SMITH 001-1175 FEB 2-21-518-0340 HWY 79 FEB 2-11-007-0455 6TH ST FEB 2-10-747-1393 VARIOUS MTRS FEE 2-14-204-1615 FRNT ST RDIO FEB 2-18-937-3152 MUSEUM FEB 2-21-981-4720 HWY 79 FEB 2-02-351-4946 SR CTR FEB 2-21-560-5874 MARGARITA FEB 2-18-049-6416 FRONT ST PED FEB 2-19-171-8568 WEDDING CHPL 190-180-999-5319 001-164-603-5240 190-180-999-5240 340-199-701-5240 190-185-999-5240 210-165-631-5801 190-181-999-5240 190-180-999-5319 001-164-603-5319 190-185-999-5240 FEB 2-20-817-9929 PD SATELLITE 001-170-999-5229 FIRE ALARM LVL 1:CP:3/27-28/01 001-171-999-5261 1,870.47 267.78 291.85 28.05 18.76 411.23 14.26 602.16 55.31 188.69 90.82 226.05 100.00 1,870.47 2,194.96 100.00 67811 03/01/01 SQL SERVER MAGAZINE 67812 03/01/01 004247 STERICYCLE ANN'L SUBSCRIPTION:#279393 320-199-999-5228 PARAMEDIC SQUAD MED WASTE DISP 001-171-999-5311 49.95 46.56 49.95 46.56 67813 03/01/01 000305 TARGET STORE 67813 03/01/01 000305 TARGET STORE 67813 03/01/01 000305 TARGET STORE 67813 03/01/01 000305 TARGET STORE RFC SUPPLIES FOR HIGH HOPES RECREATION CLASSES SUPPLIES RECREATION SUPPLIES - SR CTR FAMILY FUN NIGHTS SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5320 190-183-999-5320 190-181-999-5301 190-183-999-5371 67.08 53.74 130.28 53.37 304.47 67814 03/01/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 001-2125 607.50 67814 03/01/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 190-2125 96.75 67814 03/01/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 193-2125 6.75 67814 03/01/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 194-2125 2.25 67814 03/01/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 320-2125 22.50 67814 03/01/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 330-2125 22.50 67814 03/01/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 340-2125 51.75 67815 03/01/01 000642 TEMECULA 67815 03/01/01 000642 TEMECULA 67815 03/01/01 000642 TEMECULA 67815 03/01/01 000642 TEMECULA 67815 03/01/01 000642 TEMECULA 67815 03/01/01 000642 TEMECULA 67815 03/01/01 000642 TEMECULA 67815 03/01/01 000642 TEMECULA 67815 03/01/01 000642 TEMECULA 67816 03/01/01 000307 TEMECULA 67816 03/01/01 000307 TEMECULA 67816 03/01/01 000307 TEMECULA 67817 03/01/01 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE CITY FLEXIBLE CITY FLEXIBLE CITY FLEXIBLE CITY FLEXIBLE CITY FLEXIBLE CITY FLEXIBLE CITY FLEXIBLE CITY FLEXIBLE TROPHY COMPANY TROPHY COMPANY TROPHY COMPANY VALLEY BAPTIST EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 001-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 165-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 190-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 194-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 192-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 193-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 280-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 330-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 340-1020 TROPHIES S/F BASKETBALL LEAGUE TROPHIES TURKEY TROT SOFTBALL TROPHIES S/E SOFTBALL LEAGUE 190-187-999-5313 190-187-999-5313 190-187-999-5313 REFUND:$EC.DEPOSIT:MS99-0988 190-2900 5,153.18 225.00 934. O0 3.75 1.25 9.75 75.00 466.66 11.25 93.20 66.49 1,241.30 100.00 810.00 6,879.84 1,400.99 100.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 12 03/01/01 13:03 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 67818 67819 67820 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 TEMECULA VALLEY WOMAN'S 001483 TOM DOOSON & ASSOCIATES 003031 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUMBER REFUND:SEC.DEPOSIT:MS01-OO06 190-2900 JAN CONSULTING SVC:MURRIETA CR 210-165-707-5801 PW TRAFFIC MAINT SUPPLIES 001-164-601-5218 ITEM AMOUNT 100.00 1,014.95 409.58 67821 03/01/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 001-2360 148.88 67821 03/01/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 165-2360 3.01 67821 03/01/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 190-2360 30.46 67821 03/01/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 192-2360 .08 67821 03/01/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 193-2360 3.23 67821 03/01/01 003560 TP~RNSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 194-2360 .59 67821 03/01/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 280-2360 1.49 67821 03/01/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 300-2360 .74 67821 03/01/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 320-2360 6.00 67821 03/01/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 330-2360 2.25 67821 03/01/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 340-2360 4.27 67822 67822 67822 67822 67822 67822 67822 67822 67822 67822 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 000389 U S C M WEST COBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 000389 U S C M WEST COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 000389 U S C M WEST (OSRA) 000389 PT RETIE 000389 U S C M WEST COBRA) 000389 PT RE?IR 000389 U S C M WEST COBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 000389 U S C M WEST COBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 000389 U S C M WEST COBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 004435 U S CONFERENCE OF MAYOR 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 67823 67823 67823 67823 67823 67823 67823 67823 001-2080 165-2080 190-2080 192-2080 193-2080 194-2080 280-2080 300-2080 320-2080 340-2080 001-2160 165-2160 190-2160 193-2160 280-2160 320-2160 330-2160 340-2160 2001MBRSHP DUES:US CONF MAYOR 001-100-999-5226 67824 10,694.27 101.16 2,034.62 7.36 167.89 46.85 117.36 88.54 1,416.68 169.43 1,322.34 93.76 806.05 15.78 27.28 62.60 54.28 17.51 2,294.00 67825 03/01/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 001-2120 127.05 67825 03/01/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 165-2120 8.75 67825 03/01/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 190-2120 27.58 67825 03/01/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 192-2120 .10 67825 03/01/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 193-2120 2.18 67825 03/01/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 194-2120 .54 67825 03/01/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 280-2120 2.50 67825 03/01/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 320-2120 5.00 67825 03/01/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 330-2120 5.00 67825 03/01/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 340'2120 .60 CHECK AMOUNT 100.00 1,014.95 409.58 201.00 14,844.16 2,399.60 2,294.00 179.30 VOUCHRE2 03/01/01 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 67826 67827 67827 67827 67828 67829 67829 67830 67831 67832 67833 67834 67835 13:03 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CHECK DATE 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 03/01/01 VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION UVM CONTINUING EDUCATIO 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA ~EST GROUP LINK PERFORMANCE-BDGT:GR:4/27 FEB XXX-2626 PD SATELLITE STN FEB XXX-3526 FIRE ALARM FEB XXX-3564 ALARM 03/01/01 WOLNICK, GLORIA 03/01/01 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 03/01/01 004211 YEE, FRANK CCR TITLE 19 FIRE PUB:#11745 002097 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCT PW MAINT DIVISION SUPPLIES 002097 WESTERN HIGNWAY PRODUCT SALES TAX WBITAKER, PATRICIA 003756 WHITE HOUSE SANITATION FEB CLEANING SVC:BTRFLD STAGE REFUND:EXCUR-GETTY MUSEUM JAN BASE CHARGE 5830 COPIER 20GS HARDDRIVE DATA STORAGE-PW 03/01/01 003776 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATIO PARAMEDIC SQUAD SUPPLIES ACCOUNT NUMBER 001"140-999-5261 001-170-999-5229 320-199-999-5208 320-199'999'5208 001'171-999-5228 001-164-601-5401 001-164-601-5401 RFND:EXCUR-HARLEM GLOSETROTTER 190-183-4986 190-180-999-5250 190-183-4986 330-199-999-5217 001-164-602-5242 001'171'999-5311 ITEM AMOUNT 285.D0 257.97 82.23 54.82 75.00 2,331.28 174.85 22.00 50,00 17.00 80.30 120.00 268.78 PAGE 13 CHECK AMOUNT 285.00 395.02 75.00 2,506.13 22.00 50.00 17.00 80.30 120.00 268.78 TOTAL CHECKS 1,114,097.79 VOUCNRE2 CITY OF TEMEODLA PAGE 10 03/08/01 08:25 VOUCNER/CNECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV' LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL R 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES AMOUNT 73,018.00 4,252.00 19,967.61 721.16 1,050.00 8,296.34 474,645.45 350.00 3,562.83 7,813.67 6,681.07 TOTAL 600,358.13 VOUCHRE2 03/08/01 08:25 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK HUMBER DATE 67836 03/07/01 67839 03/08/01 67840 03/08/01 67841 03/08/01 67842 03/08/01 67843 03/08/01 67843 03/08/01 67843 03/08/01 67843 03/08/01 67844 03/08/01 67845 03/08/01 67846 03/08/01 67846 03/08/01 67847 03/08/01 67847 03/08/01 67848 03/08/01 67849 03/08/01 67849 03/08/01 67849 03/08/01 67850 03/08/01 67851 03/08/01 67852 03/08/01 67853 03/08/01 67853 03/08/01 67854 03/08/01 67854 03/08/01 67854 03/08/01 67855 03/08/01 67856 03/08/01 67857 03/08/01 67858 03/08/01 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 000848 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF C[T[ 004148 A T & T 000745 A T & T WIRELESS SERVIC 000434 ACCELA.COM 003304 ADAMS ADVERTISING 002877 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES 002877 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES 002877 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES 002877 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES 004422 004422 004240 004240 000101 001323 001323 001323 000427 003943 002541 004423 004423 004444 004444 004444 003126 BOOMGAARDEN, DENNIS BORDEN, RICHARD 002099 BUTTERFIELD ENTERPRISES C/W BUSINESS PARK, LLC ITEM DESCRIPTION COMM/ECON DEV MTG:3/IO/OI:J.C. LONG DISTANCE SERVICES CELLULAR PHONE SVCS:POLICE DPT SIERRA CF/TRAINING:4/30-5/4/01 OLD TWN BILLBOARD AD:MARCH CREDIT:OVREHRG ADD'L NOURS EXCURSION BUS-RARLEM GLOBE. ADDITIONAL HOURS CHILDREN MUSEUMS TOUR:S.ANA ALVAREZ REAL ESTATE REFD:GRADING DEPST LD98-0302 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF REFUND:SEC DEPOSIT:MS98-4316 AMERICAN BATTERY CORPOR BATTERIES FOR POLICE VEHICLES AMERICAN BATTERY CORPOR BATTERIES FOR POLICE VEHICLES ACCOONT NUMBER 001-100-999-5258 001-170-999'5208 001'170-999-5208 001-163'999'5261 280-199-999-5362 190'183'999'5350 190'183-999-5350 190-183-999-5350 210-190-165-5802 001'2670 190-2900 001-170-999-5214 001-170'999-5214 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSE CITY LIMITS BLOOD DRAWS-PD/CRP 001-170-999-5328 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSE CITY LIMITS BLOOD DRAWS-PD/CHP 001-170-999-532B APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 02/17 BRUNER ARRG~HEAD WATER INC BOTTLED WATER SVCS: MNTC FAC ARROWHEAD WATER INC BOTTLED WATER SVC:CRC ARROWHEAD WATER INC BOTTLED WATER SVCS: CITY HALL ARTESIA IMPLEMENT INC BEAR STATE PUMP & EQUIP INDUSTRIAL PUMP DISTRIBUTOR BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRV CITYWIDE AC & PCC REPAIRS BIG EDS CHAINSAW SERVlC CARBIDE CHAIN:FIRE STN 73 BIG EDB CHAINSAW SERVIC SALES TAX BLUE OCEAN SOFTWARE INC TRACK-IT HELP DESK SOFTWARE BLUE OCEAN SOFTWARE INC TRACK-IT AUDIT 100 PC BLUE OCEAN SOFTWARE INC FREIGHT TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS REFD:GRADING DEPST LD98-153GR OLD TWN RESTROOM RENTAL:MAR REFD:LDSCP BOND PA97-0283 001-162-999-5118 340-199-702-5250 190-182-999-5250 340-199-701-5250 REPAIR & MAINT OF TCSD TRACTOR 190-180-999-5214 190-182-999-5212 001-164-601-5402 001~171-999-3242 001-171-999-5242 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 190-183-999-5330 001-2670 280-199-999-5234 001-2650 ITEM AMOUNT 40.00 116.56 214.29 350.00 1,751.00 10.00- 320.95 70.00 417.04 995.00 100.00 253.61 74.71 21.00 357.00 291.18 94.36 102.30 204.88 29.35 783.93 3,745.00 607.00 45.53 995.00 295.00 20.00 345.60 995.00 826.00 6,505.83 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 40.00 116.56 214.29 350.00 1,751.00 797.99 995.00 100.00 328.32 378.00 291.18 401.54 29.35 783.93 3,745.00 652.53 1,310.00 345.60 995.00 826.00 6,505.83 VOUCNRE2 03/08/01 08:25 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 67859 03/08/01 67859 03/08/01 67860 03/08/01 67861 03/08/01 67862 03/08/01 67863 03/08/01 67863 03/08/01 67863 03/08/01 67863 03/08/01 67863 03/08/01 67863 03/08/01 67864 03/08/01 67865 03/08/01 67866 03/08/01 67867 03/08/01 67867 03/08/01 67867 03/08/01 67867 03/08/01 67867 03/08/01 67868 03/08/01 67869 03/08/01 67870 03/08/01 67870 03/08/01 67871 03/08/01 67872 03/08/01 67873 03/08/01 67874 03/08/01 67875 03/08/01 67876 03/08/01 67877 03/08/01 67878 03/08/01 67878 03/08/01 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 000128 CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES 000128 CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES CALIF STATE EMT-PARAMED 004448 CALIFORNIA T~S 004228 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY 002534 CATERERS CAFE 002534 CATERERS CAFE 002534 CATERERS CAFE 002534 CATERERS CAFE 002534 CATERERS CAFE 002534 CATERERS CAFE ITEM DESCRIPTION PUBLIC OFFICIAL BOND:S.JONES MUSEUM POLICY PREMIUM:35391950 PARAMEDIC LICENSE:M. BRANDT T-SHIRTS:EVERY 15 MIN PGRM RECREATION SUPPLIES @ TCC REFSHMNT:CHILDREN MUSEUMS TOUR REFSHMNT:TEAMBUILDING MTG REFSHMNT:TEAMBUILDING MTG REFSHMNT:TEAMBUILDING MTG REFBNMNT:TEAMBUILDING MTG REFSNMNT:CM BUSINESS MTGS CB RANCH ENTERPRISES RESERVATIONS FOR TCSD:SR CTR CNOA/FULLERTON POLICE D RAVE CULTURE CF:MORIN:3/27/01 004017 COMERCHERO, JEFF 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS 002571 CONCHOLA, BARBARA COSTCO WHOLESALE CRC RELOCATE SMOKE DETECTOR ALARM MONITORiNG:C.MUSEUM CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ALARM REPAIR PROXIMITY KEYFOB SALES TAX ENTERTAINMENT:HIGH HOPE DANCE REFUND:ENG DEPOSIT:LD99-219GR 003739 COTTON BELAND ASSOCIATE NOV/DEC HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE 003739 COTTON BELAND ASSOCIATE DEC/FEB HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE D & D COMMERCIAL CONSTR REFD:GRADING DEPST LDOO-O26GR 001233 DANS FEED & SEED INC 001393 DATA TICKET INC DECARLO, DAVID 002954 DIAMOND GARAGE DICK-CON DON VEASEY CONSTRUCTION 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN PROPANE GAS FOR FIELD TANKS JAN CITATIONS PROCESSING SVCS REFD:GRADING DEPST LD95-O57GR RES IMPR PRGM:MILLS,LINDA/LARR REFD:GRADING DEPST LD97-114GR REFD:GRADING DEPST LD99-138GR FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES ACCOUNT NUMBER 300-199-999-5200 190-185-999-5250 001-171-999-5261 001-170-999-5371 190-184-999-5301 210-190-165-5802 001-163-999-5260 001-165-999-5260 001-164-602-5260 001-164-604-5260 001-110-999-5260 190-185-999-5350 001-170-999-5261 001-100-999-5258 190-182-999-5250 190-180-999-5250 190-180-999-5212 320-199-999-5242 320-199-999-5242 190-181-999-5301 001-2670 001-161-999-5248 001-161-999-5248 001-2670 001-164-601-5218 001-170-999-5250 001-2670 165-199-813-5804 001-2670 001-2670 190-180-999-5263 001-163-999-5263 ITEM AMOUNT 350.00 711.00 130.00 545.85 25.70 242.00 67.19 67.19 67.19 67.18 34.95 105.00 35.00 81.97 75.0O 99.58 90.00 1,200.00 90.00 100.00 995.00 1,099.00 553.50 995.00 32.94 303.00 1,000.00 765.00 995.00 995.00 177.14 99.32 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 1,061.00 130.00 545.85 25.70 545.70 105.00 35.00 81.97 1,554.58 100.00 995.00 1,652.50 995.00 32.94 303.00 1,000.00 765.00 995.00 995.00 VOUCNRE2 CITY OF TEMEOULA PAGE 3 03/08/01 08:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 67878 03/08/01 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN 67878 03/08/01 004192 DO~4NS COMMERCIAL FUELIN 67878 03/08/01 004192 DOgNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN 67878 03/08/01 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN 67878 03/08/01 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN 67878 03/08/01 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN 67879 03/08/01 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 67879 03/08/01 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 67879 03/08/01 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 67879 03/08/01 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 67879 03/08/01 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 67879 03/08/01 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 67879 03/08/01 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 67879 03/08/01 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 67880 03/08/01 002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES TEMP HELP W/E 02/23 RUSH TEMP HELP W/E 02/23 EBON TEMP HELP W/E 02/23 EBON TEMP HELP W/E 02/23 EBON TEMP HELP W/E 02/23 EBON TEMP HELP W/E 2/23 BROWN TEMP HELP W/E 2/23 OBMANN TEMP HELP W/E 02/23 HEER REFSHMNT:COUNCIL CLOSE SESSION 001-1990 001-161-999-5263 001-162-999-5263 001-165-999-5263 001-164-601-5263 001-164-604-5263 001-161-999-5118 340-199~701-5118 340-199-702-5118 340-199-701-5118 340-199-702-5118 001-164-604-5118 001-171-999-5118 001-162-999-5118 001-100-999-5260 19.17 128.09 130.77 146.29 577.64 60.57 1,874.21 206.46 68.82 647.34 215.78 3,673.22 1,444.76 2,286.40 245.51 1,338.99 10,416.99 245.51 67881 03/08/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE JAN LDSCP REPAIRS:TCC 190-184-999-5415 400.15 400.15 67882 03/08/01 004418 F P C GRAPHICS 67882 03/08/01 004418 F P C GRAPHICS 67882 03/08/01 004418 F P C GRAPHICS QTY 1100 PAYROLL CHECKS FREIGHT SALES TAX 001-140-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 851.49 20.00 63.86 935.35 67883 03/08/01 000478 FAST SIGNS 67884 03/08/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 67884 03/08/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 67884 03/08/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 67884 03/08/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 67884 03/08/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC MUSEUM SIGN:AUTOMOTIVE ART EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 190-185-999-5301 001-150-999-5230 001-164-604-5230 001-111~999-5230 001-162-999-5230 190-180-999-5230 19.66 16.06 32.86 14.82 33.83 23.71 19.66 121.28 67885 03/08/01 004310 FEDEX GROUND INC 67885 03/08/01 004310 FEDEX GROUND INC 67886 03/08/01 FIRE SPRINKLER ADVISORY GROUND EXPRESS PACKAGE SERVICE GROUND EXPRESS PACKAGE SERVICE iNSPECT/MNTC SEM:5/4:CUMMINGS 001-120-999-5277 001-1270 001-171-999-5261 69,80 56.61 140.00 126.41 140.00 67887 03/08/01 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO LOT BOOK REPORT: NICHOLS 165-199-999-5250 150.00 150.00 67888 03/08/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 67888 03/08/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 67888 03/08/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 67889 03/08/01 FOLEY, TAMI 67890 03/08/01 FOWLER, KATHY 67891 03/08/01 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY 67891 03/08/01 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY 67891 03/08/01 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY 67891 03/08/01 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY XX"2292 G.ROBERTS:PROF MTG XX'1405 UBNOSKE:APA CF:GT-CD XX-0432 ELMO:AIRFARE:MN & PS REFUND:FOLEY T./PICNIC SHELTER REIMB:AIR FARE SIERRA CF:4/30 DAY TIMER SUPPLIES - FINANCE DAY TIMER SUPPLIES - FINANCE DAY TIMER SUPPLIES - FINANCE DAY TIMER SUPPLIES - FINANCE 001-140-999-5260 001-161-999-5258 001-162-999-5258 190-183-4989 001-163-999-5261 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 21.11 990.00 385.00 30.00 240.00 22.40 84.00 5.40 6.32 1,396.11 30.00 240.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4 03/08/01 08:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 67891 03/08/01 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY SHIPPING/HANDLING 67891 03/08/01 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY SALES TAX 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 10.80 9.67 138.59 67892 03/08/01 004424 G B HORLOCK CONSTRUCTIO RES IMPR PRGM:BEARD~RICHARD 67893 03/08/01 002528 GLASS BLASTERS CITY MUGS FOR NEW HIRES 165-199-813-5804 001-150-999-5265 382.00 34.40 382.00 34.40 67894 03/08/01 004159 GOODENOUGH, DONNA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 67895 03/08/01 000175 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFI G~FR REVIEW 5/1/01-4/30/02 190-183-999-5330 001-140-999-5226 56.00 50.00 56.00 50.00 67896 03/08/01 HALLE ENTERPRISES LLC REFD:GRADING DEPST LD97-O~GR 001-2670 995.00 995.00 67897 03/08/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT 001-171-999-5212 67897 03/08/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES - PW MNTC 001-164-601-5218 67897 03/08/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES - TRFFC DIV 001-164-602-5242 67897 03/08/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPL]ES: MNTC FAC 340-199-701-5212 67897 03/08/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC CRC TEEN ROOM CEILING TILES 190-182-999-5416 67897 03/08/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 4~X8~ PLASTIC SHEETS-MARILITE 190-182-999-5416 67897 03/08/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC SALES TAX 190-182-999-5416 67897 03/08/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES - CRC 190-182-999-5212 67897 03/08/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES - TCSD 190-180-999-5242 67897 03/08/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES - CRC 190-182-999-5212 67897 03/08/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC CRC TEEN ROOM CEILING TILES 190-182-999-5416 67897 03/08/01 000186 BANKS HARDWARE INC CEILING TILES 3 CASES 190-182-999-5416 67897 03/08/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC PLASTIC SHEETS TABLE SAW BLADE 190-182-999-5416 67897 03/08/01 000186 HANKS NARDWAR8 INC SALES TAX 190-182-999-5416 67897 03/08/01 000186 HANKS NARDWAR8 INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES: B & S 001-162-999-5242 67897 03/08/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES: TCSD 190-180-999-5212 67897 03/08/01 000186 HANKS NARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES: TOO 190-184-999-5212 67897 03/08/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES: MNTC FAC 340-199-702-5212 67897 03/08/01 000186 HANKS RARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES - PW MNTC 001-164-601-5218 67897 03/08/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 2 WATER PUMP BRACKETS:CRC 190-182-999-5212 67897 03/08/01 0001~ HANKS HARDWARE INC SALES TAX 190-182-999-5212 67897 03/08/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES: MUSEUM 190-185-999-5301 67897 03/08/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES - PW MNTC 001-164-603-5212 67898 03/08/01 002906 HEMET FENCE COMPANY RES IMPR PRGM:YOUNG,KIMBERLY 165-199-813-5804 67899 03/08/01 002126 HILLYARD FLOOR CARE SUP CRC GYM FLOOR CLEANING PRODUCT 190-182-999-5416 67899 03/08/01 002126 NILLYARD FLOOR CARE SUP SALES TAX 190-182-999-5416 67900 03/08/01 HONIG INVESTMENT GROUP REFD:GRADING DEPST LD97-O99GR 001-2670 67901 03/08/01 000540 HR ONE INC / G NElL DIR CALIF OSHA POSTERS 001-150-999-5220 67901 03/08/01 000540 HR ONE INC / G NEIL DIR CALIF MINIMUM WAGE POSTERS 001-150-999-5220 67901 03/08/01 000540 HR ONE INC / G NEIL DIR SHIPPING CHARGES FOR POSTERS 001-150-999-5220 67901 03/08/01 000540 BR ONE INC / G NEIL DIR SALES TAX 001-150-999-5220 67902 03/08/01 HUNCO DEVELOPMENT INC. REFD:GRADING DEPST LD97-O79GR 001-2670 234.24 359.32 97.07 19.32 200.00 49.75 10.56 216.81 88.57 364.36 111.60 146.88 2.10 11.40 16.00 767.51 64.18 66.57 49.76 280.00 21.00 24.66 20.93 1,390.00 15.96 .75 995.00 64.95 64.95 21.76 9.74 995.00 3,222.59 1,390.00 16.71 995.00 161.40 995.00 VOUCHRE2 03/08/01 08:25 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 5 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 67903 03/08/01 003737 67903 03/08/01 003737 67903 03/08/01 003737 67904 03/08/01 004050 67904 03/08/01 004050 67905 03/08/01 001407 67906 03/08/01 004179 67906 03/08/01 004179 67907 03/08/01 001186 IRWIN, JOHN 67908 03/08/01 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES 67908 03/08/01 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES 67909 03/08/01 004115 K T U & ASSOCIATES 67910 03/08/01 KADTEC 67911 03/08/01 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC 67911 03/08/01 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY 67911 03/08/01 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY 67911 03/08/01 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC 67911 03/08/01 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY 67912 03/08/01 67912 03/08/01 67913 03/08/01 67914 03/08/01 67914 03/08/01 67915 03/08/01 004174 LIGHT IMPRESSIONS 67915 03/08/01 004174 LIGHT IMPRESSIONS 67916 03/08/01 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS 67916 03/0B/01 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS 67917 03/08/01 004141 MAINTEX INC 67918 03/08/01 MARTINELLI, ROBERT 67919 03/08/01 004107 MASSA-LAVITT, SANDRA 67920 03/08/01 002693 MATROS, ANDREA 67921 03/08/01 MEJIA, BARBARA ITEM DESCRIPTION IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS WINDOWS 2000 PRO CD/W BOOTDISK WINDOWS 2000 PRO DOCKIT SALES TAX IMAGE SOURCE MNTC FOR FIRE STN 12 COPIER IMAGE SOURCE MNTC FOR FIRE STN 73 COPIER INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS INTERNATIONAL EZ-UP CANOPY FRAME W/RAG:POLICE DEPT INTERNATIONAL EZ-UP SALES TAX TCBD INBTRUCTOR EARNINGS FEB SVCS:ENGIREERING/PLAN CK FEB WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM DEC SVCS:TEM MULTI-USE TRAILS REFD:GRADING DEPST LDOO-O44GR BANNERS CLEAN/STORAGE:HOT AIR FREIGHT SALES TAX BANNERS CLEAN/STORAGE:ROD RUN BANNERS CLEAN/STORAGE:HOT AIR 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 2/25 GC BUFALINO 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 2/25 GC BUFALINO 001534 LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV AIRFARE:NAT'L PLAN CF:5/10-14 003726 LIFE ASSIST INC INFECTIOUS CONTROL CLEAN-UP 003726 LIFE ASSIST INC FREIGHT MUSEUM LIGHTING SUPPLIES MUSEUM LIGHTING SUPPLIES STREET SIGN HARDWARE/SUPPLIES STREET SIGN HARDWARE - PW CRC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES REFUND:ENG DEPOSIT:LD98-O71GR 02/20-03/01/01 CONSULTING SVCS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS REFUND:SEC DEPOSIT:MSO0-2890 ACCOUNT NUMBER 320-1980 320-1980 320-1980 001-171-999-5217 001-171-999-5217 190-186-999-5250 001-170-999-5242 001-170-999-5242 190-183-999-5330 001-163-999-5248 001-1182 210-190-176-5802 001-2670 001-111-999-5271 001-111-999-5271 001-111-999-5271 001-111-999-5271 001-111-999-5271 001-15D-999-5118 001-110-999-5118 001-161-999-5258 340-199-701-5212 340-199-701-5212 190-185-999-5250 190-185-999-5250 001-164-601-5244 001-164-601-5244 190-182-999-5212 001-2670 001-161-999-5248 19D-183-999-5330 190-2900 ITEM AMOUNT 26.00 31.00 4.28 240.00 240.00 317.13 396.00 29.70 388.00 1,625.00 8.61~ 3,825.00 995.00 3,400.00 70.00 255.00 186.75 176.65 49.88 49.87 571.00 14.40 1.01 167.16 47.33 252.63 81.70 182.64 995.00 2,204.80 480.00 100.00 CHECK AMOUNT 61.28 480.00 317.13 425.70 388.00 1,616.39 3,825.00 995.00 4,088.40 99.75 571.00 15.41 214.49 334.33 182.64 995.00 2,204.80 480.00 100.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 6 03/08/01 08:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 67922 03/08/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 67922 03/08/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 67922 03/08/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 67922 03/08/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 67922 03/08/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 67922 03/08/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 67922 03/08/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 67923 03/08/01 MISSION TEMECULA LLC ITEM DESCRIPTION BUSINESS CARDS:S.RUDDELL SALES TAX BUSINESS CARDS: FIRE STN #12 BUSINESS CARDS: FIRE STN #73 BUSINESS CARDS: FIRE STN #84 BUSINESS CARDS: FIRE STN #83 SALES TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-140-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 001-171-999-5222 001-171-999-5222 001-171-999-5222 001-171-999-5222 001-171-999-5222 REFUND:ENG DEPOS1T:LDOO-IO4GR 001-2670 ITEM AMOUNT 38.25 2.87 38.25 38.25 38.25 38.25 11.47 995.00 CHEEK AMOUNT 205.59 995.00 67924 03/08/01 001868 MIYAMOTO-JURKOSKY, SUSA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 76.80 76.80 67925 03/08/01 000883 MONTELEOBE EXCAVATING 67926 03/08/01 001986 MUSI CAL AUDIO ENVIRONM 67927 03/08/01 002925 BAPA AUTO PARTS 67927 03/08/01 002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS 67928 03/08/01 000727 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTIO 67929 03/08/01 004433 NEWPORT SIGNS 67929 03/08/01 004433 NEWPORT SIGNS 67929 03/08/01 004433 NEWPORT SIGNS 67930 03/08/01 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT 67930 03/08/01 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT 67930 03/08/01 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT 67930 03/08/01 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT 67931 03/08/01 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S 67931 03/08/01 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S 67932 03/08/01 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 67933 03/08/01 000472 PARADISE CHEVROLET CADI 67934 03/08/01 000249 PETTY CASH 67934 03/08/01 000249 PETTY CASH 67934 03/08/01 000249 PETTY CASH 67934 03/08/01 000249 PETTY CASH 67934 03/08/01 000249 PETTY CASH 67934 03/08/01 000249 PETTY CASH 67934 03/08/01 000249 PETTY CASH 67934 03/08/01 000249 PETTY CASH 67934 03/08/01 000249 PETTY CASH 67934 03/08/01 000249 PETTY CASH 67934 03/08/01 000249 PETTY CASH 67934 03/08/01 000249 PETTY CASH GRADE DIRT ROADS:VARI(XJS LOCS 195-180-999-5402 MAR MUSIC BROADCAST:OLD TOWN 001-164-603-5250 TRUCK BEDLINER-MEDIC SQUAD 84 001-171-999-5214 SALES TAX 001-171-999-5214 RENEW ANNUAL SUBSCR:O00128648 001-171-999-5228 EXTENDER BARRIERS-MUS.EXHIBITS 190-185-999-5250 FREIGHT 190-185-999-5250 SALES TAX 190-185-999-5250 RECRUIT ADS:REC ASST/BLDG INSP 001-150-999-5254 RECRUIT AD:REC ASSISTANT 001-150-999-5254 RECRUIT AD:REC ASSISTANT 001-150-999-5254 RECRUIT AD:BLDG INSPECTOR II 001-150-999-5254 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR FINANCE 001-140-999-5220 OFFICE BUPPL-O.T.SATELLITE STN 001-170-999-5229 CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-165-999-5214 CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS-PLANNING 001-161-999-5214 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5261 190-183-999-5320 190-183-999-5320 190-183-999-5320 001-165-999-5260 190-183-999-5350 001-150-999-5261 001-111-999-5270 001-164-604-5214 001-171-999-5261 001-171-999-5261 001-171-999~5261 1,050.00 59.50 99.99 7.50 635.00 2,268.00 186.04 170.10 100.00 12.50 12.50 12.50 56.23 88.36 19.15 634.15 10.00 32.42 5.36 21.97 15.17 16.00 36.00 31.99 9.58 25.00 25.00 25.00 1,050.00 59.50 107.49 635.00 2,624.14 137.50 144.59 19.15 634.15 253.49 67935 03/08/01 PLAZA TEMECULA, LLC REFUND:ENG DEPOSIT:LD99-O73GR 001-2670 995.00 VOUCHRE2 03/08/01 08:25 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 67935 03/08/01 67936 03/08/01 000253 67936 03/08/01 000253 67937 03/08/01 000254 67938 03/08/01 002110 67939 03/08/01 003493 67939 03/08/01 003493 67940 03/08/01 67941 03/08/01 67942 03/08/01 000947 67943 03/08/01 000262 67943 03/08/01 000262 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS 67944 67945 03/08/01 67946 03/08/01 000266 67947 03/08/01 000353 67947 03/08/01 000353 67948 03/08/01 000418 67949 03/08/01 001365 67950 03/08/01 002181 67950 03/08/01 002181 67951 03/08/01 000815 67951 03/08/01 000815 67951 03/08/01 000815 67952 03/08/01 003917 67953 03/08/01 002505 67954 03/08/01 002681 67954 03/08/01 002681 67955 03/08/01 VENDOR NAME PLAZA TEMECULA, LLO POSTMASTER POSTMASTER ITEM DESCRIPTION REFUND:ENG DEPOSIT:LD99-O72GR EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 03/08/01 003591 RENES COMMERCIAL MANAGE WEED SPRAY/ABATE:MARG DESILT 67956 03/08/01 000537 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2670 001-120-999-5230 001-161-999-5230 REYES GROUP INC.~ THE RIGHTWAY RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & RE RIVERSIDE CO ENVIRONMEN RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION ROWLEY, CATHY ROWLEY~ CATHY ROWLEY, CATHY SEARS ROEBUCK & COMPANY REFUND:ENG DEPOSIT:LD99-175GR MAR EQUIP RENTAL - RIVERTON PK JAN PARKING CITATION ASSESSMNT JAN PARKING CITATION ASSESSMNT WEED ABATEMENT LIEN RELEASE ANNUAL HEALTH PERMIT FOR CRC PRGS PMT #11:1ST ST BRG:95-08 CREDIT:CITY INSPECTION SVDS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS CRC TEEN PRDM RED EQUIPMENT PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN 3/20/01-3/18/02 SUBSCR/9298672 001-110-999-5228 PRIME EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT RENTAL FOR PW 001-164-601-5238 PRO-CRAFT OVERHEAD DOOR RES IMPRV PRGM: R. BEARD 165-199-813-5804 PRO-CRAFT OVERHEAD DOOR RES IMPRV PRGM: J. BRUNO 165-199-813-5804 PROJECT MANAGEMENT INST ANNUAL MBRSHP:A.ATTAR:#96555 001-165-999-5226 RAMSEY, WILLING REFUND:ENG DEPOSIT:LDOO-O32GR 001-2670 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C DUPL BLUEPRINTS:MARG RD WIDEN 001-165-999-5250 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST FEB 01-99-02003-0 FLOATING MTR 001-164-601-5250 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST FEB 02-79-10100-1NW SPRTS PRK 190-180-999-5240 001-164-601-5401 001-2670 190-180-999-5238 001-2260 001-2265 001-120-999-5250 190-182-999-5250 280-199-807-5804 280-199-807-5804 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 190-182-999-5301 SIGNS & LUCITE PRODUCTS CITY HALL WALL SIGN-G.I.S.ROUM 340-199-701-5250 SILVER LEGACY RESORT & SILVER LEGACY RESORT & SMITH, JUDSON SO CALIF EDISON HTL:ACCELA CONF:KF:4/30-05/04 HTL:ACCELA C0NF:#369505797194 REFUND:ADMIN CIT# 6568 MAR 2-10-331-2153 TCC 001-163-999-5261 001-140-999-5261 001-161-4255 190-184-999-5240 ITEM AMOUNT 995.00 55.60 40.55 135.19 8.60 780.00 785.00 119.00 995.00 153.51 269.90 83.89 3,975.00 995.00 62.88 1,272.50 385.00 10.00 326.00 472,568.45 500.00- 64.00 192.00 64.00 677.23 91.40 246.40 184.80 50.00 557.38 PAGE 7 CHECK AMOUNT 1,990.00 96.15 135.19 8.60 1,565.00 119.00 995.00 153.51 353.79 3,975.00 995.00 62.88 1,657.50 10.00 326.00 472,068.45 320.00 677.23 91.40 431.20 50.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 8 03/08/01 08:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCBER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 67956 03/08/01 67956 03/08/01 67956 03/08/01 67956 03/08/01 67956 03/08/01 67956 03/08/01 67956 03/08/01 67956 03/08/01 67957 03/08/01 67958 03/08/01 67959 03/08/01 67960 03/08/01 67961 03/08/01 67962 03/08/01 67962 03/08/01 67962 03/08/01 67962 03/08/01 67962 03/08/01 67963 03/08/01 67964 03/08/01 67965 03/08/01 67965 03/08/01 67966 03/08/01 67966 03/08/01 67966 03/08/01 67967 03/08/01 67968 03/08/01 67968 03/08/01 67968 03/08/01 67968 03/08/01 67969 03/08/01 67970 03/08/01 67971 03/08/01 67972 03/08/01 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000282 SO CALIF MUNICIPAL ATHL 003000 STATE WATER RESOURCES 003599 T Y LIN INTERNATIONAL 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY 000306 TEHECULA VALLEY PIPE & 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & 003140 TEMECULA VALLEY TAEKWON 003545 THINK JACOGSON & ROTH 004403 TODAY VERTICALS 004403 TODAY VERTICALS 000319 TOMARK SPORTS INC 000319 TOMARK SPORTS INC 000319 TOMARK SPORTS INC 003366 TORAN DEVELOP. & CONSTR 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC WEIR, ERIC 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS IN WESTCOAST SALT LAKE CIT ITEM DESCRIPTION FEB 2-20-792-2444 VARIOUS MTRS MAR 2-19-683-3255 FRONT ST PED FEB 2-19-683-3263 FRONT ST PED DEC 2-22-231-4502 LONG CYN CRK FEB 2-00-397-5042 CITY HALL FEB 2-00-397-5067 VARIOUS MTRS FEB 2-02-502-8E77 MAINT FAC FEB 2-18-528-9980 SANTIAGO RD ENERGY CRISIS & YOU:LA/BS:2/14 PERMIT FEE:PALA RD BRIDGE FEB CONSTR SUPPORT:PALA:97-15 SUNSHINE FUND TROPHIES S/F SOFTBALL LEAGUE CRC RESTROOM SOAP DISPENSERS SALES TAX FEB VAR PARKS MAINT SUPPLIES CRC PLUMBING SUPPLIES CRC PLUMBING SUPPLIES TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS DSGN/INSTALL WALL OF HERITAGE QTY 30 WINDOW SEADES FOR CRC SALES TAX FIELD HARKING PAINT-CITY PARKS FREIGHT SALES TAX MAINTENANCE-OLD TOWN ROD RUN FEB XXX-1408 PD SATELLITE STN FEB XXX-5509 GENERAL USAGE FEB XXX-5857 GENERAL USAGE FEB XXX-9897 GENERAL USAGE ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-180-999-5319 001-164-603-5319 001-164-603-5319 190-180-999-5240 340-199-701-5240 193-180-999-5240 340-199-702-5240 190-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5261 210-165-631-5801 210-165-631-5801 001-2170 190-187-999-5313 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-182-999~5212 190-182-999-5212 190-183-999-5330 210-190-808-5804 190-182-999-5416 190-182-999-5416 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 001-164-603-5250 001-170-999-5229 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 REFUND:DUPLICATE PMT:INV# 1882 001-1210 REFUND:ADMIN CIT# 0286 CITYWIDE TREE MAINTENANCE SVCS BTL:BRA1NSHARE CF:TR:3/18-3/23 001-161-4255 001-164-601-5402 320-199-999-5261 ITEM AMOUNT 325.87 391.71 370.02 46.06 4,270.85 721.16 779.88 204.66 30.00 250,00 62.30 50.47 12.63 520.38 39.03 51.99 632.67 324.17 100.00 3,500.00 4,603.32 274.41 37.50 10.00 2.81 3,488.00 323.11 124.10 42.50 75.91 190.00 100.00 1,367.50 659.04 CHECK AMOUNT 7,667.59 30.00 250.00 62.30 50.47 12.63 1,568.24 100.00 3,500.00 4,877.73 50.31 3,488.00 565.62 190.00 100.00 1,367.50 659.04 VOUCNRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 9 03/08/01 08:25 VOUCHER/CHEEK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 67973 67974 67974 67974 67974 67974 67974 67974 67974 67974 67974 CNECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 03/08/01 03/08/01 03/08/01 03/08/01 03/08/01 03/08/01 03/08/01 03/08/01 03/08/01 03/08/01 03/08/01 002109 WHITE CAP INDUSTRIES IN 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI ITEM DESCRIPTION PW MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES JAN LEASE DC460 COPIERS JAN LEASE DC240 COPIER JAN INT. DC460/DC240 COPIERS JAN LEASE DC420 COPIER MNTC FA JAN POOLED MAINTENANCE JAN LEASE DC420 COPIER @ TCC JAN LEASE DC420 @ FIRE STN 84 SALES TAX JAN LEASE OF 5800 COPIER JAN INTEREST OF 5800 COPIER ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-164-601-5218 330-2800 330-2800 330-199-999-5391 330-199-999-5217 330-199-999-5217 190-184~999-5239 001-171-999-5239 001-171-999-5239 330-2800 330-199-999-5391 ITEM AMOUNT 266.67 1,242.95 375.91 1,109.38 223.62 2,480.34 224.62 208.02 15.60 1,764.74 616.73 CHECK AMOUNT 266.67 8,261.91 TOTAL CHECKS 600,358.13 VOUCMRE2 CITY OF TEMEEULA PAGE 12 03/15/01 11:22 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV~ LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES AMOUNT 150,158.40 3,860.55 58,697.53 30,643.25 2,206.62 343.50 47,028.94 8,092.49 85,355.37 5,917.22 3~725.73 3,398.93 TOTAL 399,428.53 VOUCHRE2 CiTY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1 03/15/01 11:22 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOpCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 48089 03/15/01 000246 48089 03/15/01 000246 48089 03/15/01 000246 48089 03/15/01 000246 48089 03/15/01 000246 48089 03/15/01 000246 48089 03/15/01 000246 48089 03/15/01 000246 48089 03/15/01 000246 48089 03/15/01 000246 48089 03/15/01 000246 48089 03/15/01 000246 48089 03/15/01 000246 48089 03/15/01 000246 48089 03/15/01 000246 48089 03/15/01 000246 48089 03/15/01 000246 48089 03/15/01 000246 48089 03/15/01 000246 48089 03/15/01 000246 48089 03/15/01 000246 48089 03/15/01 000246 48089 03/15/01 000246 48089 03/15/01 000246 VENDOR NAME PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEESf RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PRES (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS ENPLOYEESf RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PRES EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERB EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEEB~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS ENPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 67975 03/14/01 002185 POSTMASTER - TEMECUIA 449025 03/15/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 449025 03/15/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 449025 03/15/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 449025 03/15/01 000283 INSTATAX (iRS) 449025 03/15/01 000283 [NSTATAX (IRS) 449025 03/15/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 449025 03/15/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 449025 03/15/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 449025 03/15/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 449025 03/15/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 449025 03/15/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 449025 03/15/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 449025 03/15/01 000283 INBTATAX (IRS) 449025 03/15/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 449025 03/15/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 449025 03/15/01 000283 INSTATAX (iRS) 449025 03/15/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 449025 03/15/01 000283 INSTATAX (iRS) 449025 03/15/01 000283 INSTATAX (iRS) 449025 03/15/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 449025 03/15/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 449025 03/15/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) ITEM DESCRIPTION 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERB RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS-PRE 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR POSTAGE-QTR COMMUNITY NEWSLTR 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2390 165-2390 190-2390 192-2390 193-2390 194-2390 280-2390 300-2390 320-2130 320-2390 330-2390 340-2390 001"2130 001-2390 165~2390 190-2390 192-2390 193-2390 194-2390 280-2390 300-2390 320-2390 330-2390 340-2390 001-110-999-5230 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 ITEM AMOUNT 26,676.46 669.33 4,808.22 11.61 471.75 98.66 300.44 127.82 26.51 lt176.23 206.19 589.34 140.96 89.52 1.87 18.89 .05 2.00 .36 .92 .46 3.72 1.39 2.65 2,930.26 24,730.29 458.68 5,076.50 15.84 403.10 124.01 186.07 74.25 1,516.02 268.30 540.24 5,966.55 155.99 1,371.20 2.62 116.08 21.75 70.89 29.24 344.64 73.89 152.39 CHECK AMOUNT 35,425.35 2,930.26 41,698.54 449092 03/15/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 001-2070 96.07 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 03/15/01 11:22 VOUCRER/CRECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 449092 03/15/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 BDI 165-2070 5.16 449092 03/15/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 190-2070 100.40 449092 03/15/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 193-2070 3.36 449092 03/15/01 000444 INBTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 280-2070 1.33 449092 03/15/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 320-2070 21.28 449092 03/15/01 000444 . [NBTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 330-2070 8.39 449092 03/15/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 340-2070 3.93 449092 03/15/01 000444 INBTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 001-2070 6,582.57 449092 03/15/01 000444 INBTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 165-2070 135.72 449092 03/15/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 190-2070 1,126.64 449092 03/15/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 192-2070 4.68 449092 03/15/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 193-2070 87.98 449092 03/15/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 194-2070 37.02 449092 03/15/01 000444 INBTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 280-2070 67.35 449092 03/15/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 300-2070 15.34 449092 03/15/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070 329.63 449092 03/15/01 000444 INBTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 330-2070 59.55 449092 03/15/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 340-2070 118.41 68005 68006 68006 68007 68008 68009 68009 68010 68011 68011 68011 68011 68011 68011 68011 68011 68012 68012 68013 68013 68013 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 000434 ACCELA.COM 003304 ADAMS ADVERTISING INC 003304 ADAMS ADVERTISING 004054 ADKISON ENGINEERS INC 003717 AMERICAN ASPHALT REPAIR 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSE 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSE 004022 AMERICAN MINI STORAGE, 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 004316 AN WIL BAG COMPANY 004316 AN WIL BAG COMPANY 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. 003266 ARCUS DATA SECURITY 68014 ACCELA.COM CF:WEBTON:4/30'5/3 001-1990 BILLBOARD CHG:BLUEGRASS FEST BILLBOARD CHG:WESTERN DAYS 280-199-999-5362 280-199-999-5362 JAN-FEB SURVEY BVC:lst BRIDGE 280-199-807-5804 REL RETENTION:PWO0-13 SLURRY 210-2035 CITY LIMITS BLOOD DRAWS-PD/CBP 001-170-999-5328 CITY LIMITS BLOOD DRAWS-PD/CBP 001-170-999-5328 MARCH STORAGE RENTAL-C115 001-120-999-52~ FEB MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:CITY RALL 340-199-701-5250 FEB MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:METC FAC FEB MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:SR CTR FEB MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:CRC FEB MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:TCC FEB MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:MUSEUM FEB UNIFORMS:PW MNTC WORKERS FEB UNIFORMS RENTAL:TCSD MNTC 340-199-702-5250 190-181-999-5250 190-182-999-5250 190-184-999-5250 190-185-999-5250 001-164-601-5243 190-180-999-5243 COLD PATCH ASPHALT:PW MNTC SALES TAX 001-164-601-5218 001-164-601-5218 TEMP HELP W/E 02/24 BRUNER TEMP HELP W/E 02/24 SIMPKINS TEMP HELP W/E 03/03 BRUNER 001-162-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 001-162-999-5118 FEB MICROFILM STORAGE 001-120-999-5277 350.00 400.00 400.00 3,861.00 33,019.99 84.00 167.00 124.00 83.40 34.20 51.36 84.01 36.96 31.70 92.08 70.00 595.00 44.63 202.56 886.28 303.84 860.50 8,804.81 350.00 800.00 3,861.00 33,019.99 251.00 124.00 483.71 639.63 1,392.68 860.50 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 3 03/15/01 11:22 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOUB VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 68015 68016 68017 68017 68017 68018 68018 68018 68018 68018 68018 68019 68019 68019 68019 68019 68020 68021 68022 68023 68024 68025 68025 68025 68025 68025 68026 68027 68027 68027 68027 68027 68028 68029 68030 68030 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY 003376 ARTS COUNCIL, THE 002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C 002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C 002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C 002848 BADGER, THE 002848 BADGER, THE 002848 BADGER, THE 002848 BADGER, THE 002848 BADGERv THE 002848 BADGER, THE 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGBR 004206 BANUELOS, TERESA BERESOVOY, LOUIS 003582 BROWN JR., WILLIAM E. CABRERA, JIMMY 003138 CAL MAT 000128 CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES 000128 CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES 000128 CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES 000128 CAL BURANCE ASSOCIATES 000128 CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES 001655 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY 000131 002358 000137 060137 CANNAR CO., THE CANNAR CO., THE CANNAR CO., THE CANNAR CO., THE CANNAR CO., THE CARL WARREN & COMPANY I CERTIFIED FOLDER DIBPLA CHEVRON U S A INC CHEVRON U S A INC ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUMBER TEAM PACE RESALE MERCHANDISE 001-1665 SPNSRSHP:CONCERT ON THE GREEN MEMBERSHIPS:ZUNA/HODSOH/LEWIS MEMBERSHIPS:ZUNA/HODSON/LEWIS MEMBERSHIPS:ZUNA/HODSON/LEWIS CRIME PREVENTION PROMO ITEMS CRIME PREVENTION PROMO ITEMS CRIME PREVENTION PROMO ITEMS CRIME PREVENTION PROMO ITEMS FREIGHT FREIGHT TCC:REPAIR REFRIGERATOR ELECTRICAL SVCS:BINGO BOARD ELECTRICAL SVCS:PARKS TCC:INSTALL COMM EXHAUST FAN ELECTRICAL REPAIRS:OLD TWN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS REFUND:EX-RIPLEY'S & MOVIELAND MILEAGE REIMB-PW SIGNAL TEC REFUND: MCP PICNIC SHELTER PW PATCH TRUCK MATERIALS 001-101-999-5286 001'163-999'5214 001'164-601-5214 001-162-999-5214 001'170-999-5292 001-170-999'5229 001-170-999-5292 001-170-999-5229 001'170-999'5292 001'170-999'5229 190-184-999-5212 190'180-999-5212 190'180-999-5212 190-184-999-5242 001'164'603'5250 190-183-999-5330 190'183'4986 001-164-602-5262 190-183'4989 001-164'601-5218 COMM PROPERTY ANNUAL PREMIUM 300'1655 PROPERTY INSURANCE ANNUAL PREM 300-1655 PROPERTY INSURANCE ANNUAL PREM 300-1655 PROPERTY INSURANCE ANNUAL PREM 300-1655 PROPERTY INSURANCE ANNUAL PREM 300-1655 WELDING SUPPLIES:PW MNTC CREW REFD:APPLICATION FEE PA01-0039 REFD:APPLICATION FEE PA01-0039 REFD:APPLICAT10N FEE PA01-0039 REFD:APPLICATION FEE PA01-0039 REFD:APPLICAT[ON FEE PA01-0039 CLAIM ADJUSTER SERVICES DELIVERY OF RACK BROCHURES FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-164-601-5218 001-171-4036 001-161-4370 001-161-4119 001-163-4388 001-163-4119 300-199-999-5205 001-111-999-5230 001-110-999-5262 001-170-999-5262 ITEM AMOUNT 227.00 12,000.00 53.00 53.00 53.00 188.16 35.84 134.40 25.60 8.15 1.55 386.00 78.00 118.50 924.74 245.00 170.00 20.00 28.29 30.00 410.92 38,362.00 30,325.00 9,450.00 4,050.00 1,798.75 9.68 430.00 100.00 1,907.50 59.50 543.00 290.00 7.31 56.33 38.59 CHECK AMOUNT 227.00 12,000.00 159.00 393.70 1,752.24 170.00 20.00 28.29 30.00 410.92 83,985.75 9.68 3,040.00 290.00 7.31 94.92 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4 03/15/01 11:22 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 68031 03/15/01 004203 CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTIO 004203 AR CHILD 190-2140 88.84 88.84 68032 03/15/01 001555 CHRISTOPHERSON FIRE PRO TCC SEMI-ANNUAL FIRE SYS TEST 190-184-999-5250 80.05 80.05 68033 03/15/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 001-2120 118.50 68033 03/15/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 190-2120 5.60 68033 03/15/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 193-2120 .60 68033 03/15/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 194-2120 .20 68033 03/15/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 330-2120 5.50 68033 03/15/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 340-2120 .60 68034 03/15/01 001193 COMP U S A INC SCANJET 6300cxi FOR GIS 001-161-610-5242 68034 03/15/01 001193 COMP U S A INC SALES TAX 001~161-610-5242 68035 03/15/01 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS R&R ROOF HATCH SWITCH:CRC 190-182-999'5250 68035 03/15/01 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS REPAIR ALARM IR SENSOR:MUSEUM 190'185'999-5250 68035 03/15/01 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS ALARM MONITORING:CITY HALL 340-199-701-5250 68035 03/15/01 000442 COMPUTER ALERT GYSTEMS ALARM MONITORING:MNTC FAC 340'199'702-5250 68035 03/15/01 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS ALARM MONITORING:CRC 190-182-999-5250 68035 03/15/01 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS ALARM MONITORING:TLC 190-184-999-5250 68035 03/15/01 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS ALARM MOHITORING:SR CENTER 190-181-999-5250 68035 03/15j01 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS ALARM MONITORING:MUSEUM 190-185-999-5250 68035 03/15/01 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS ALARM MONITOMING:C.MUSEUM 190'180-999-5250 68035 03/15/01 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS ALARM MONITORING:CHAPEL 190-185-999-5250 68035 03/15/01 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS ALARM MONITORING:6TH ST PRKLOT 001'164'603'5250 68036 03/15/01 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET BATTERY FOR HAND HELD RADIO 001'164'601'5218 68036 03/15/01 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET SALES TAX 001-164-601-5218 68037 03/15/01 CURRENCE, MARY KEELER 68038 03/15/01 004436 DANA WHARF SPORTFISHING REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 EXEC STAFF TEAM BUILDING 001-150-999-5260 68039 03/15/01 002701 DIVERSIFIED RISK FEB SPECIAL EVENTS PREMIUMS 300-2180 68040 03/15/01 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 320-199-999-5262 68040 03/15/01 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-1990 68040 03/15/01 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-161-610-5262 68041 03/15/01 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 02/23 HANSEN 001-164-604-5118 68041 03/15/01 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 02/23 HANSEN 001-120-999-5118 68041 03/15/01 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 02/23 HANSEN 001-161-999-5118 68041 03/15/01 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 02/23 HANSEN 190-180-999-5118 68041 03/15/01 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 02/23 VOSHALL 001-161-999-5118 68042 03/15/01 004427 EDWARDS, SALLY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 68043 03/15/01 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP INSTALL TRANSFORMER:FRONT ST 001-164-603-5212 68043 03/15/01 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP SALES TAX 001-164-603-5212 68043 03/15/01 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP ELECT SUPPLIES/REPAIRS:CRC 190-182-999-5242 68043 03/15/01 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP ELECT SUPPLIES/REPAIRS:CRC 190-182-999-5242 366.51 27.48 75.00 209.37 210.00 135.00 246.00 246.00 135.00 135.00 246.00 110.00 75.00 80.00 6.00 100.00 852.19 693.96 22.05 33.69 17.43 988.73 333.37 366.12 122.04 2,049.26 128.00 155.48 11.66 21.90 21.90 131.00 393.99 1,822.37 86.00 100.00 852.19 693.96 73.17 3,859.52 128.00 VOUCHRE2 03/15/01 11:22 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CNECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 5 VOUCNER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 68043 03/15/01 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP 68043 03/15/01 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP 68043 03/15/01 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP 68043 03/15/01 004130 ELSIRORE ELECTRICAL SUP 68043 03/15/01 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP 68043 03/15/01 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP 68044 03/15/01 003623 EXCEL HARDWARE 68045 03/15/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 68045 03/15/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 68046 03/15/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 68046 03/15/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 68046 03/15/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 68046 03/15/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 68046 03/15/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 68047 03/15/01 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO 68047 03/15/01 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO 68047 03/15/01 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO 68047 03/15/01 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO 68048 03/15/01 003347 FIRST BANXCARD CENTER 68048 03/15/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 68048 03/15/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 68048 03/15/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 68048 03/15/01 003347 FIRST BANKGARD CENTER 68048 03/15/01 003347 FIRST SANKCARD CENTER 68049 03/15/01 001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M 68050 03/15/01 000173 GENERAL BINDING CORPORA 68051 03/15/01 000177 GLENN1ES OFFICE PRODUCT 68051 03/15/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 68051 03/15/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 68051 03/15/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 68051 03/15/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 68051 03/15/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 68051 03/15/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 68051 03/15/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 68051 03/15/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 68051 03/15/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 68051 03/15/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 68052 03/15/01 000175 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFI 68053 03/15/01 000520 N D L COREN& CONE IRC 68054 03/15/01 004053 HABITAT WEST INC ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ELECT SUPPLIES/REPAIRS;CRC ELECT SUPPLIES/REPAIRS:CRC ELECT SUPPLIES/REPAIRS:CRC ELECT SUPPLIES/REPAIRS:CRC SALES TAX ELECT SUPPLIES/REPAIRS:PARKS 190-182-999-5242 190-182-999-5242 190-182-999-5242 190-182-999-5242 190-182-999-5242 190-180-999-5212 HARDWARE SUPPLIES - PW MNTC FEB LDSCP SVCB:OLD TWN BARREL FEB LDSCP REPAIRS:OLD TOWN 001-164-601-5218 001-164-603-5416 001-164-603-5416 EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-110-999-5230 001-111-999-5230 190-180-999-5230 001-150-999-5230 001-162-999-5230 LOT BOOK REPRT:MCMEEKIN LOT BOOK REPRT:BENZING LOT BOOK REPRT:VERDRA LOT BOOK REPRT:MENDEZ XX-7824 COMERCHERO:SW AIR/MTG XX-7824 COMERCHERO:SW AIR/MTG XX-9277 R.ROBERTS:2 SW AIR XX-6165 YATES:EXEC TEAM BUILD XX-6165 YATES:EXEC TEAM BUILD XX-6165 YATES:EXEC TEAM BUILD PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 165-199-999-5250 165-199-999-5250 165-199-999-5250 165-199-999-5250 001-100-999-5258 001-100-999-5260 001-100-999-5258 001-150-999-5260 001-150-999-5260 001-150-999-5260 001-150-999-5250 BINDING SUPPLIES FOR COPY CTR 330-199-999-5220 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-ECON DEVE 001-111-999-5220 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:GM MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-FINANCE M1SC OFFICE SUPPLIES - HR MISG OFFICE SUPPLIES-PLANNING MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES- 8&S MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:SR CTR MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:TCSD MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:MUSEUM MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-ECON DEVE MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-ECON DEVE 001-110-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-150-999-5220 001-161-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 190-181-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-185-999-5220 001-111-999-5220 001-111-999-5220 COPY:GOVT ACT,AUDIT,&FINANCIAL 001-140-999-5228 PROPERTY TAX CONSULTING SVCS 001-140-999-5248 FEB PRGSS:PALA RD BRDGE IMPR 210-165-631-5804 ITEM AMOUNT 42.00 85.00 128.20 192.30 36.85 94.80 12.57 264.00 175.00 12.92 55.57 17.53 11.00 15.56 150.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 195.50 31.25 345.00 51.99 25.00 34.00 260.00 86.46 83.00 70.96 98.57 43.76 21.97 120.28 13.57 130.40 578.00 300.00 135.32 93.00 2,400.00 5,510.00 CHECK AMOUNT 790.09 12.57 439.00 112.58 600.00 682.74 260.00 86.46 1,595.83 93.00 2,400.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 6 03/15/01 11:22 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 68054 03/15/01 004053 HABITAT WEST INC RETENTION:PALA RD PW97-15(EM) 210-2035 551.00- 4,959.00 68055 03/15/01 002372 HARMON, JUDY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 373.24 373.24 68056 03/15/01 002126 HILLYARD FLOOR CARE SUP CREDIT:RETURN FINISH SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5416 1,907.35- 68056 03/15/01 002126 HILLYARD FLOOR CARE SUP SALES TAX 190-182-999-5416 143.05- 68056 03/15/01 002126 HILLYARD FLOOR CARE SUP CRC GYM FLOOR FINISH SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5416 3,8~.40 68056 03/15/01 002126 HILLYARD FLOOR CARE SUP FREIGHT 190-182-999-5416 36.00 68056 03/15/01 002126 RILLYARD FLOOR CARE SUP SALES TAX 190-182-999-5416 290.51 68056 03/15/01 002126 HILLYARD FLOOR CARE SUP FLOOR CARE AND SUPPLY 190-182-999-5416 17.32 2,166.83 68057 03/15/01 HOTEL PACIFIC HTL:PLANNERS CF:DU/AW/RG/JT/DC 001-161-999-5258 398.86 68057 03/15/01 HOTEL PACIFIC HTL:PLANNERS CF:DU/AW/RG/JT/DC 001-161-999-5272 2,193.~ 2,592.59 68058 05/15/01 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 001-2080 2,579.48 68058 03/15/01 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 165-2080 445.85 68058 03/15/01 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 190-2080 388.50 68058 05/15/01 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 195-2080 40.00 68058 03/15/01 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 194-2080 16.50 68058 03/15/01 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 280-2080 148.62 68058 03/15/01 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 300-2080 50.00 3,668.95 68059 03/15/01 001186 IRWIN~ JOHN DJ SVCS:SPRING SWING DANCE 190-183-999-5320 125.00 125.00 68060 03/15/01 003223 K E A ENVIRONMENTAL, IN JAN BIOLOGICAL SVC:PALA BRIDGE 210-165-631-5801 924.20 924.20 68061 03/15/01 004115 K T U & ASSOCIATES JAN SVCS:TEM MULTI-USE TRAILS 210-190-176-5802 1,900.00 1~900.00 68062 03/15/01 KANDUS, COLLEEN REFUND:EX-RIPLEY~S & MOVIELAND 190-183-4986 40.00 40.00 68063 03/15/01 KEETON CONSTRUCTION COM REFUND:GRADING DPST LDOO-O81GR 001-2670 995.00 995.00 68064 03/15/01 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC BANNERS CLEAN/STORAGE:WSTN DAY 280-199-999-5271 176.91 176.91 68065 03/15/01 003986 KEVIN COZAD & ASSOCIATE JAN-FEB SURVEY SVC:SLACK PROP 210-190-167-5802 1,130.00 1,130.00 68066 03/15/01 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC CRC HVAC REPAIRS IN TEEN ROOM 190-182-999-5250 515.00 68066 03/15/01 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC TLC:REPLACE NVAC CIRCUIT BOARD 190-184-999-5250 586.00 68066 03/15/01 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC CRC:INSTALL 3 NEW THERMOSTATS 190-182-999-5212 558.00 1,659.00 68067 03/15/01 000206 KINKOS INC STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPLIES 350-199-999-5220 112.88 68067 03/15/01 000206 KINKOS INC ASSEMBLY PRGM:EVERY 15min PRGM 001-170-999-5371 252.41 365.29 68068 03/15/01 001405 KIWANIS CLUB OF TEMECUL 00-01COMM SVC FUNDING AWARD 001-101-999-5267 5,000.00 5,000.00 68069 03/15/01 001534 LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV AIRFARE:PARKER:YOUTH MUSEUM CF 190-1990 487.00 487.00 68070 03/15/01 004412 LEANDER, KERRY D. TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5350 216.00 68070 03/15/01 004412 LEANDER, KERRY D. TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 153.66 369.66 68071 03/15/01 003286 LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVI FEB SVCS-LIBRARY SYSTEM AGRMT 001-101-999-5285 1,116.99 1,116.99 VOUCHRE2 03/15/01 11:22 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 7 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK HUMBER DATE 68072 03/15/01 68072 03/15/01 68072 03/15/01 68073 03/15/01 68074 03/15/01 68075 03/15/01 68075 03/15/01 68075 03/15/01 68076 03/15/01 68077 03/15/01 68078 03/15/01 68079 03/15/01 68079 03/15/01 68080 03/15/01 68081 03/15/01 68082 03/15/01 68083 03/15/01 68084 03/15/01 68084 03/15/01 68085 03/15/01 68086 03/15/01 68086 03/15/01 68086 03/15/01 68086 03/15/01 68087 03/15/01 68088 03/15/01 68088 03/15/01 68088 03/15/01 68088 03/15/01 68088 03/15/01 68089 03/15/01 68090 03/15/01 VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS MARG RD WIDENING PHASE 1 SIGNS 001-165-999-5250 005782 MAIN STREET SIGNS SALES TAX 001-165-999-5250 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS VARIOUS STREET SIGNS 001-164-601-5244 004141 MAINTEX INC CITY HALL CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 340-199-701-5212 003090 MARGARITA MIDDLE SCHOOL ENTERTNMNT:OICKENS HOL:12/15 280-199-999-5362 004307 MARINE BIOCHEMISTS AERATION TUBING FOR DUCK POND 190-180-999-5212 004307 MARINE BIOCHEMISTS FREIGHT 190-180-999-5212 004307 MARINE BIOCHEMISTS SALES TAX 190-180-999-5212 003448 MELODYS AD WORKS PROF SVCS:O.T.BLUEGRASS FEST. 280-199-999-5250 004208 MILANOS REFRESHMNTS:HARVESTON MTG:3/06 001-161-999-5260 003163 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEM SE CTR ANNUL COPIER MNTC AGRMN 330-199-999-5217 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS HR PAYCHECK ENCLOSURE SUPPLIES 001-150-999-5222 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001-150-999-5222 001214 MORNINGSTAR MUSICAL PRO SOUND SYBTEM-HOL.PARADE-12/01 190-183-999-5370 004390 NATELSOH COMPANY IBC WATER PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY 210-190~170-5802 NIXON, MAUREEN REFUND:DANCE-TAP-ADULT/BEG 190-183-4982 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT FEB DISPLAY ADS:VAR CIP UPDATE 001-165-999-5256 002292 OASIS VENDING CITY HALL SUPPLIES/SERVICE 340-199-701-5250 002292 OASIS VENDING MAINT FAC SUPPLIES/SERVICE 340-199-702-5250 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S OFFICE SUPPLIES-PD MAIN STN 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAIBT 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT ORTIZ, GABRIEL 002652 OSCARS RESTAURANT 002652 OSCARS RESTAURANT 002652 OSCARS RESTAURANT 002652 OSCARS RESTAURANT 002652 OSCARS RESTAURANT 001-170-999-5220 001-163-099-5214 001-165-999-5214 001-165-999-5214 001-163-999-5214 REFUND:BABYBLASTERS MOMMY & ME 190-183-4982 REFRESHMENTS:EVERY 15 MIN PRGM 001-170-999~5371 SALES TAX 001-170-999-5371 REFRESHMENTS:EVERY 15 MIN PRGM 001-170-999-5371 SALES TAX 001-170-999-5371 DELIVERY CHARGE:EVERY 15 MIN 001-170-999-5371 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L~T 001-2122 000247 PESTMASTER WEED SPRAYING-R.C.RD/BUS PK DR 001-164-601-5402 ITEM AMOUNT 112.50 435.38 30.75 150.00 330.00 123.67 24.75 2,000.00 44.70 248.00 264.54 19.84 1,300.00 5,000.00 75.00 533.80 458.67 51.60 38.00 93.57 19.19 103.55 25.00 397.50 26.44 1,252.30 86.80 3.94 154.60 1~097.00 CHECK AMOUMT 2,047.88 30.75 150.00 478.42 2,000.00 44.70 248.00 284.38 1,300.00 5,000.00 75.00 533.80 510.27 38.00 235.50 25.00 1,766.98 154.60 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 8 03/15/01 11:22 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 68091 68092 68092 68092 68092 68092 68092 68092 68092 68092 68092 68092 68092 68092 68093 68093 68093 68094 68094 68095 68096 68097 68098 68099 68099 68100 68100 68100 68100 68100 68100 68100 68100 68100 68100 68100 68100 68101 68101 68101 68101 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 03/15/0'1 002861 PETSMART 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 05/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASN 000580 PNOTO WORKS OF TEMECULA 000580 PROTO WORKS OF TEMECULA 000580 PHOTO WORKS OF TEMECULA 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN' 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT 004395 QUALITY FENCE COMPANY 000635 R & J PARTY PALACE 004453 R C ENTERPRISES 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCBO DALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCHO DALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCRO CALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 000262 RANCRO CAL[F WATER DIST 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 000907 RANCNO CAR WASH 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT POLICE K-9 FOOD & SUPPLIES 001-170-999-5327 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-170-999-5371 001-161-999-5220 001-162-999-5258 190-181-999-5301 001-110-999-5261 210-1990 001-150-999-5261 330-199-999-5250 001-170-999-5371 001-170~999-5370 190-183-999-5350 001-161-999-5230 001-150-999-5261 FEB FILM/PHOTO DEV - MUSEUM FEB FILM/PHOTO DEV - PLANNING FEB FILM/PHOTO DEV - TCSD 190-185-999-5250 001-161-999~5220 190-180-999-5250 FEB VAR PUBLIC NTCS:PLANNING 001-161-999-5256 RECRUITMENT ADS FOR HR DEPT 001-150-999-5254 EQUIPMENT RENTAL-PW MAINT CREW 001-164-601-5238 RES IMPRV PRGM: UNDERHILL 165-199-813-5804 STAGE RENTAL/TREE LIGHT/OK PND 190-183-999-5370 RUBBER STAMP FOR FINANCE 001-140-999-5220 BLUEPRINTS FOR MPSC EXPANSION 210-190-163-5802 BLUEPRINTS:MARG/STOREWOOD/O018 001'165-999'5250 MAR 01'06-84860-5 PUJOL ST VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS 280-199-807-5801 190-180-999-5240 190-181-999-5240 190-182~999-5240 190-184-999-5240 190-186-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 340-199-701-5240 190-185-999-5240 001-164-603-5240 001-165-999-5250 210-165-828-5804 CITY VEHICLE DETAILING CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & FUEL CITY VENICLE DETAILING & FUEL CITY VEHICLE DETAILING 001-162-999-5214 001-110-999-5214 001-110-999-5263 001-165-999-5214 87.25 37.31 10.45 32.17 15.03 8.00 5.58 35.30 10.00 14.25 40.80 20.00 37.52 39.68 22.55 21.51 49.17 151.50 1,360.82 301.00 1,175.00 80.00 15.05 53.07 134.29 44.26 2,427.59 89.08 310.49 114.65 148.63 882.80 329.70 57.41 181.95 72.64 37.10 41.00 7.00 33.39 15.00 87.25 306.09 93.23 1,512.32 301.00 1,175.00 80.00 15.05 187.36 4,696.30 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 9 03/15/01 11:22 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 68101 03/15/01 000907 RANCHO CAR WASN 68101 03/15/01 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 68101 03/15/01 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 68101 03/15/01 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 68102 03/15/01 RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES 68103 03/15/01 000268 RIVERSIDE CO HABITAT 68104 03/15/01 SAN DIEGO AREA CHAPTER 68105 03/15/01 SCHRYER, RICHARD 68106 03/15/01 004441 SIEGEL DISPLAY PRODUCTS 68106 03/15/01 004441 SIEGEL DISPLAY PRODUCTS 68107 03/15/01 000645 SMART & FINAL INC 68107 03/15/01 000645 SMART & FINAL INC 68107 03/15/01 000645 SMART & FINAL 68107 03/15/01 000645 SMART & FINAL IBC 68108 03/15/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 68108 03/15/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 68108 03/15/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 68108 03/15/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 68108 03/15/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 68108 03/15/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 68108 03/15/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 68108 03/15/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 68108 03/15/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 68108 03/15/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 68108 03/15/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 68108 03/15/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 68109 03/15/01 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 68109 03/15/01 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 68109 03/15/01 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST COMTR 68109 03/15/01 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 68110 03/15/01 000293 STADIUM PIZZA 68111 03/15/01 000305 TARGET STORE 68111 03/15/01 000305 TARGET STORE 68111 03/15/01 000305 TARGET STORE 68111 03/15/01 000305 TARGET STORE 68111 03/15/01 000305 TARGET STORE 68112 03/15/01 001672 TEMECULA DRAIN SERV & P 68112 03/15/01 001672 TEMECULA DRAIN SERV & P ITEM DESCRIPTION CITY VEHICLE DETAILING CITY VEHICLE DETAILING CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & FUEL CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & FUEL REFUND:FEE OVRPMT:PA99-0152 FEBRUARY 2001 K-HAT PAYMENT MEMBERSMIP FOR 2001:A. ELMO REFUND:TENNIS-INTR/ADV ADULT TCSD COMBINATION DISPL.NOLDER FREIGHT SUPPLIES FOR EMPLOYEE LUNCHEON MISC SUPPLIES FOR TEEN PRGM SUPPLIES FOR CITY COUNCIL MTGS MISG MUSEUM SUPPLIES MAR 2-17-214-0428 MEADOWS PKWY MAR 2-06-105-0654 VARIOUS MTRS MAR 2-18-363-1902 PAUSA RD MAR 2-22-057-2226 VARIOUS MTRS MAR 2-22-057-2234 MARGARITA MAR 2-19-538-2262 VARIOUS MTRS MAR 2-20-798-3248 VARIOUS MTRS MAR 2-02-351-5281 CRC MAR 2-02-351-5281 CRC MAR 2-01-202-7330 VARIOUS MTRS MAR 2-01-202-7603 VARIOUS MTRS MAR 2-05-791-8807 VARIOUS MTRS T.V. WED CNPL PEST CONTROL SVC CITY HALL PEST CONTROL SVC T.V. MUSEUM PEST CONTROL SVC SR CTR PEST CONTROL SVCS REFRESHMNTS:CLEAN UP DAY:02/15 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PW DEPT OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PW DEPT OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PW DEPT VARIOUS SUPPLIES FOR EASTER MISC NEC CLASS SUPPLIES CRC PLUMBING SERVICES CRC PLUMBING SERVICES ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-163-999-5214 001-164-601-5214 190-180-999-5214 190-180-999-5263 001-2650 001-2300 001-162-999-5226 190-183-4982 190-185-999-5242 190-185-999-5242 001-150-999-5265 190-183-999-5320 001-100-999-5260 190-185-999-5301 190-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5240 190-180-999-5240 190-182-999-5240 190-186-999-5240 192-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5319 190-185-999-5250 340-199-701-5250 190-185-999-5250 190-181-999-5250 001-150-999-5260 001-163-999-5220 001-165-999-5220 001-164-604-5220 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5320 190-182-999-5250 190-182-999-5250 ITEM AMOUNT 14.00 35.00 13.00 22.58 500.00 2,347.30 50.00 55.00 149.95 32.18 188.81 72.31 71.71 98.51 212.99 1,711.60 87.59 79.94 94.92 78.16 345.74 729.63 3,000.00 30,600.85 10,821.84 7,210.85 32.00 56.00 42.00 29.00 438.69 58.51 58.51 58.51 50.58 65.91 55.00 55.00 CHECK AMOUNT 180.97 500.00 2,347.30 50.00 55.00 182.13 431.34 54,974.11 159.00 438.69 292.02 110.00 68113 03/15/01 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY NAMEPLATES:TCSD COMM:HOGAN/YRK 190-180-999-5222 12.36 VOUCNRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 10 03/15/01 11:22 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCBER/ CHECK CBECK NUMBER DATE 68113 03/15/01 68113 03/15/01 68113 03/15/01 68114 03/15/01 68115 03/15/01 68115 03/15/01 68115 03/15/01 68115 03/15/01 68115 03/15/01 68115 03/15/01 68115 03/15/01 68116 03/15/01 68116 03/15/01 68116 03/15/01 68116 03/15/01 68116 03/15/01 68116 03/15/01 68116 03/15/01 68116 03/15/01 68117 03/15/01 68117 03/15/01 68118 03/15/01 68118 03/15/01 68119 03/15/01 68120 03/15/01 68121 03/15/01 68121 03/15/01 68121 03/15/01 68121 03/15/01 68121 03/15/01 68121 03/15/01 68121 03/15/01 68121 03/15/01 68121 03/15/01 68121 03/15/01 68122 03/15/01 68122 03/15/01 68122 03/15/01 68122 03/15/01 68122 03/15/01 68122 03/15/01 68122 03/15/01 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY 000311 TEMECULA VALLEY HIGH SC 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT 004274 TEHECULA VALLEY SECURIT 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECUNIT 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED 000919 TEMEDULA VALLEY UNIFIED 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED 003862 TBYSSEN DOVER ELEVATOR 003862 THYSSEN DOVER ELEVATOR 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS 003031 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE TUSHAR, MARY 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 U S D M WEST (OBRA) 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT NAMEPLATE FOR J. ALEGRIA TEM PUBLIC SAFETY PRIDE AWARD VARIOUS RECOGNITION AWARDS 001-163-999-5222 001-150-999-5265 001-150-999-5265 ENTERTNMNT:DICKENS HOL:12/15 280-199-999-5362 VAR PARKS LOCKSMITH SVCS 190-180-999-5212 CHILDREN'S MUSEUM LOCKSMITH SV 190-180-999-5212 SERVICE CALL 190-180-999-5212 ORIGINAL AND DUPLICATE KEYS 190-180-999-5212 SALES TAX 190-180-999-5212 CRC LOCKSMITH SVCS 190-182-999-5212 RANCHO VISTA PEK LOCKSMITH SVC 190-180-999-5212 JAN-FEB CTY JAN-FEB CTY JAN-FEB CTY JAN-FEB CTY JAN-FEB CTY JAN-FEB CTY JAN-FEB CTY JAN-FEB CTY VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-1990 VEHICLE FUEL USAGE VEHICLE FUEL USAGE VEHICLE FUEL USAGE VEHICLE FUEL USAGE VEHICLE FUEL USAGE VEHICLE FUEL USAGE VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001'162-999-5263 190'180-999'5263 340-199'701-5263 001-170-999-5262 001'163-999'5263 001'164-601-5263 001-165-999-5263 CITY HALL/MUS ELEV INSPECT SVC CITY HALL/MUS ELEV INSPECT SVC OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR LAND DEV OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PW ADMIN TRAFFIC CONTROL SUPPLIES-PW 340-199-701-5250 190-185-999-5250 001-163-999-5220 001-164-604-5220 001-164-601-5218 REFUND:EXCUR-RIPLEYS/MOVIELAND 190-183-4986 13.17 188.13 26.96 150.00 8.49 180.00 25.00 6.32 .47 60.75 137.50 37.30 562.47 1,146.75 218.23 18.27 388.46 1,135.44 244.56 135.00 135.00 102.52 149.56 43.00 40.00 001065 DEF COMP 001-2080 10,501.11 001065 DEF COMP 165-2080 101.16 001065 DEF COMP 190-2080 1,982.00 001065 DEF COMP 192-2080 7.50 001065 DEF COMP 193-2080 168.69 001065 DEF COMP 194-2080 44.50 001065 DEF COMp 280-2080 101.16 001065 DEF COMP 300-2080 88.55 001065 DEF COMP 320-2080 1,416.68 001065 DEF COMP 340-2080 169.46 000389 PT RETIE 001-2160 1,270.52 000389 PT RETIR 165-2160 103.04 000389 PT RETIR 190-2160 916.66 000389 PT RETIE 193-2160 28.06 000389 PT RETIR 280-2160 31.04 000389 PT RET[R 320-2160 177.32 000389 PT RET1R 330-2160 69.88 240.62 150.00 418.53 3,751.48 270.00 252.08 43.00 40.00 14,580.81 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 11 03/15/01 11:22 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK HUMBER 68122 68123 68124 68124 68125 68125 68125 68125 68125 68125 68125 68125 68125 68125 68126 68126 68127 68128 68128 68128 68128 68129 68129 68130 68130 68131 68132 68133 68133 68133 CHECK DATE 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) U.S. TREASURY 002065 UNISOURCE 002065 UNISOURCE 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UNITED WAY 004368 VALI COOPER & ASSOCIATE 004368 VALI COOPER & ASSOCIATE 000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATE 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 004279 VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. 004279 VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. VON ZUP, AIMEE M. VON ZUP, AIMEE M. WHITE, JANE 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 003607 XPECT FIRST AID 003607 XPECT FIRST AID 003607 XPECT FIRST AID ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUMBER 000389 PT RETIR 340-2160 REISS CK66035-PARADE ENTRY FEE 190-183-999-5370 PAPER SUPPLIES FOR COPY CENTER 330-199-999-5220 SALES TAX 330-199-999-5220 000325 UW 001-2120 000325 UW 165-2120 000325 UW 190-2120 000325 UW 192-2120 000325 UW 193-2120 000325 UW 194-2120 000325 UW 280-2120 000325 UW 320-2120 000325 UW 330-2120 000325 UW 340-2120 JAN TEMP NELP HOFFMAN 001-165-999-5118 JAN TEMP HELP HOFFMAN 001-165-999-5118 FEB B&S PLAN CHECK SERVICES 001-162-999-5248 FEB XXX-1289 PRATT 320-199-999-5208 FEB XXX-2629 NAGGAR 320-199-999-5208 FEB XXX-2670 911 AUTO DIALER 320-199-999-5208 FEH XXX-3539 GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 MAR ACCESS-CRC OPEN PHONE LINE MAR ACCESS-RVSD CO OPEN LINE 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 REFUND:SEC DEPOSIT:MS01-0519 190-2900 REFUND:INDOOR RENTAL 190-184-4990 REFUND:MARTIAL ARTS-TA! CH! FEB BASE CHARGE-5830 COPIER 1ST AID SUPPLIES-PW MAINT CREW 1ST AID SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 1ST AID SUPPLIES-PW MAINT CREW 190-183-4982 330-199-999-5217 001-164-601-5218 340-199-701-5250 001-164-601-5218 ITEM AMOUNT 32.88 82.00 2,316.28 173.72 127.05 8.75 27.60 .10 2.20 .50 2.50 5.00 5.00 .60 7,121.76 2,503.24 2~474.98 67.47 60.46 28.37 39.08 341.38 341.38 100.00 50.00 25.63 80.30 19.40 45.88 116.24 CHECK AMOUNT 2,629.40 82.00 2,490.00 179.30 9,625.00 2,474.98 195.38 682.76 150.00 25.63 80.30 181.52 TOTAL CHECKS 399,428.53 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 3 03/15/01 12:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 261 CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 340 FACILITIES AMOUNT 944,441.22 62,727.00 37,365.00 23,138.68 364.50 174,441.60 10~399.83 27,090.00 541.00 TOTAL 1,280,508.83 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMEBULA PAGE 1 03/15/01 12:07 VO4JCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCRER/ CHECK NUMBER 68139 68139 68139 68139 68139 68139 68139 68139 68139 68139 68139 68139 68139 68139 68139 68139 68139 68139 68140 68140 68141 68141 68141 68141 68141 68142 68143 68144 68145 68146 68147 68148 68148 68148 68149 68149 68149 68149 68149 68149 68149 CRECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03127/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 03/27/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 0010~6 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 003T57 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 003737 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY IRC 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY IRC 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC 003631 KLEINFELDER INC 003286 LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVI 002666 MASON & MASON REAL ESTA 002256 P & D CONSULTANTS IRC 000247 PESTMASTER 004425 PUBLIC ENTERPRISE GROUP 004287 QUICK SET PRINTING 004287 QUICK SET PRINTING 004287 QUICK SET PRINTING 002412 RICBARDS WATSON & GERSB 002412 RICBARDS WATSON & GERSB 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSR 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER JAN LDSCP REPAIR:RANCBO VISTA JAN LDSCP REPAIR:RANCHO VISTA FEB LDSCP SVCS:NEIGHBORHO00 PK FEB LDSCP SVCS:SPORT PARKS FEB LDSCP SVCS:MEDIANS FEB LDSCP SVCS:SOUTB SLOPES FEB LDSCP SVCS:NORTB SLOPES FEB LDSCP SVCS:CRC FEB LDSCP SVCS:SR CENTER FEB LDSCP SVCS:MNTC FAC FEB LDSCP SVCS:TCC FEB LDSCP SVCS:STATION 84 FEB LDSCP SVCS:6TB ST PRKLOT FEB LDSCP SVCS:OLD TWN FEB LDSDP SVCS:NUSEUM 190-180-999-5416 190-180-999-5416 190-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 190-182-999-5415 190-181-999-5415 340-199-701-5415 190-184-999-5415 001-171-999-5212 001-164-603-5415 001-164-603-5415 190-185-999-5415 FEB LDSCP SVCS:NEIGNBORHOOD PK 190-180-999-5415 FEB LDSCP SVCS:C.MUSEUM 190-180-999-5415 FEB LDSCP SVCS:NADA FLD CNTRL 190-180-999-5415 ITEM AMOUNT 6,250.00 8,255.00 11,635.00 25,325.00 1,975.00 13,375.00 8,878.00 1,444.00 361.00 541.00 193.00 400.00 250.00 987.00 285.00 1,000.00 155.00 165.00 WINDOWS 2000 PRO 02301166 320-1980 25,200.00 SALES TAX 320-1980 1~890.00 21 NEW ROT AIR BALLOON BANNERS 001-111-999-5271 40 NEW ROD RUN OANRERS 001-111-999-5271 SET UP CHARGES 001-111-999-5271 SHIPPING AND HANDLING 001-111-999-5271 SALES TAX 001-111-999-5271 NOV-JAN GEOTEC SVC:PALA BRIDGE 210-165-631-5801 FEB SVCS-LIBRARY SYSTEM AGRMT 001-101-999-5285 APPRASIAL SVC:I-15 OVRCRS:PB 1 210-165-704-5802 2/2-2/23/01 TEMP BLD IRSPECTRS 001-162-999-5118 CITY R-O-W/CHANNEL WEED SPRAY 001-164-601-5402 EBON DEV CONSULTING SERVICES 190-180-999-5250 PRINTING-COMMUNITY NEWSLETTER ART/COPY-COMMUNITY NEWSLETTER ADD'L TYPESETTING-COMM NEWSLTR 001-110-999-5222 001-110-999-5222 001-110-999-5222 JAN 2001 LEGAL SERVICES JAN 2001 LEGAL SERVICES JAN 2001 LEGAL SERVICES JAN 2001 LEGAL SERVICES JAR 2001 LEGAL SERVICES JAN 2001 LEGAL SERVICES JAN 2001 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 190-180-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 280-199-999-5246 261-199-999-5246 210-165-631-5801 210-165-631-5801 1,785.00 3,160.00 400.00 91.50 370.88 5,837.00 9,504.48 7,000.00 10,827.20 12,425.25 7,500.00 4,222.54 799.93 591.69 34,245.83 159.00 10,399.83 690.10 364.50 475.00 140.00 CHECK AMOUNT 81,474.00 27,090.00 5,807.38 5,837.00 9,504.48 7,000.00 10,827.20 12,425.25 7,500.00 5,614.16 46,474.26 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 03/15/01 12:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 68150 03/27/01 68150 03/27/01 68150 03/27/01 68150 03/27/01 68150 03/27/01 68150 03/27/01 68150 03/27/01 68150 03/27/01 68150 03/27/01 68150 03/27/01 68150 03/27/01 68150 03/27/01 68150 03/27/01 68150 03/27/01 68150 03/27/01 68150 03/27/01 68150 03/27/01 68150 03/27/01 68150 03/27/01 68150 03/27/01 68150 03/27/01 68151 03/27/01 68152 03/27/01 68153 03/27/01 68154 03/27/01 68154 03/27/01 VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SRERIFFS D 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SNERIFFS D 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SNERIFFS D 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SNERIFFS D 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SNERIFFS D 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SNERIFFS D 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION 003599 T Y LIN INTERNATIONAL 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS IN 002097 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCT 002097 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCT 11/16-12/13/00 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5288 11/16-12/13/00 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5299 11/16-12/13/00 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5298 11/16-12/13/00 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5294 11/16-12/13/00 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5303 11/16-12/13/00 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5291 11/16-12/13/00 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5297 11/16-12/13/00 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5281 11/16-12/13/00 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5262 11/16-12/13/00 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5279 12/14-01/10/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5288 12/14-01/10/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5299 12/14-01/10/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5298 12/14-01/10/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5294 12/14-01/10/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5303 12/14-01/10/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5291 12/14-01/10/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5297 12/14-01/10/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5281 12/14-01/10/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5262 12/14-01/10/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5279 JAN 2001 BOOKING FEES 001-170-999-5273 PRGS PMT# 12:1ST ST EXT:95-08 280-199-807-5804 FEB DESIGN SVCS:R.C.BRG:99-18 210-165-710-5802 VARIOUS SLOPES TREE MAINT SVCS 193-180-999-5415 SIGNS FOR CITY CATCH BASINS SALES TAX 001-164-601-5401 001-164-601-5401 ITEM AMOUNT 211,402.80 60,816.00 30,220.80 10,344.20 20,147.20 11,492.00 15,312.00 31,658.78 17,891.86 11,078.80 227,965.67 60,843.30 30,220.80 10,344.20 20,147.20 6,760.00 15,312.00 31,865.60 19,042.86 5,801.43 10,046.40 173,751.50 9,686.68 13,137.00 5,270.72 395.30 CHECK AMOUNT 858,713.90 173,751.50 9,686.68 13,137.00 5,666.02 TOTAL CHECKS 1,280,508.83 ITEM 4 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: City Manager/City Council "~Nilliam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer March 27, 2001 SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement Diaz Road Extension and Alignment Study, Project No. PW00-10 PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Senior Engineer - Capital Projects Ward B. Maxwell, Associate Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Approve the agreement with, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to provide professional engineering services for the Alignment Study for the extension of Diaz Road to the City Limits and a Bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek, Project No. PW00-10, for the not to exceed amount of $167,101.00, and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. Authorize the City Manager to approve amendments not to exceed the contingency amount of 10% of the contract or $16,710.10. BACKGROUND: The project consists of preparing Photogrametry and Base Mapping, Field Survey, Utilities and Right of Way Study, Geotechnical Analysis, Traffic Impacts, Bridge Planning Study, Drainage Study, Cost Estimates and an Alignment Study with three alternatives. In December 2000, City staff evaluated three proposals received for providing professional engineering services as outlined in Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 086. The firms were ranked, and negotiations for the contract commenced with the number one ranked firm, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (KHA) of San Diego, California. At the February 13, 2001 City Council meeting, city staff was directed to re-conduct the RFQ process due to an irregularity. City staff re-conducted the RFQ process and recommends KHA to perform the Alignment Study for the following reasons: r~ KHA is an established firm that has an experienced staff with a proven track record on many similar projects over the past several years. [~ KHA has an in-house office staff of approximately 45 employees. r~ KHA will perform the majority of the work on this project, compared to the other firms who are proposing to use numerous sub-consultants. ~ KHA is a firm capable of performing the design should the Alignment Study progress into the design stage and the firm should be able to make a seamless transition. E3 KHA has worked with the listed sub-consultants on many similar projects over the past several years. r~ KHA Is ranked 57th among the nations top 500 design firms and 26th among the top "pure" design firm. I R:~AGDRPT~2001\0327\PW00-10 AGREEMENT. DOC All consulting firms that submitted proposals were deemed qualified to perform the Alignment Study. However, KHA was deemed most qualified of all other consultants based upon firm capabilities, staff qualifications, their methodology and approach, and their listed sub-consultants. The swift and accurate execution of this project is very important to the City of Temecula. This study's findings are expected to be instrumental in obtaining Caltrans approval for the Cherry Street Interchange, as well as approval to cross a portion of County Flood Control's planned detention basin. Sub-consultants to be utilized by KHA for this project include Geocon for geotechnical investigations, Simon Wong Engineering for bridge planning study, and KEA Environmental for environmental services. FISCAL IMPACT: The Diaz Road Extension Alignment Study Capital Improvement Project is funded through STP and Measure A Funds. Adequate funds are available in account 210-165-684- 5802 for the subject professional services agreement in the amount of $167,101.00, including the 10 % contingency amount of $16,710.10, for a total amount of $183,811.10. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Project Location 2. Project Description 3. Agreement with Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. 2 R:~AGDRPT~2.001\0327~PW00-10 AGREEMENT. DOC CITY OF TEMECULA AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES DIAZ ROAD EXTENSION TO CHERRY STREET PROJECT NO. PW00-10 THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of March 27, 2001, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on March 27, 2001, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2002, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contractor from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. Consultant shall provide a copy of prevailing wag. e.rates to any staff or sub-contractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Consultant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Consultant shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. 5. PAYMENT. a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B other than the payment rates and schedule of payment are null and void.= This amount shall not exceed One Hundred Sixty Seven Thousand One Hundred One Dollars and No Cents ($167,101.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten pement (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum (basic agreement amount and contingency amount) exceed twenty -five thousand dollars ($25,000.00). c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. 6. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSF. a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4. 7. DEFAULTOFCONSULTANT. a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constituie a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the 2 Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 8. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identi- fied and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant. 9. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City. 10. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. 3 (2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Consultant owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. (3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. (4) Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. (4) Professional Liability coverage: Two million ($2,000,000) per claim and in aggregate. c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of a(~tivities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications. 11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be availal~le to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 12. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. 5 The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 13. RELEASE OF INFORMATION. a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 14. NOTICES.. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. To City: City of Temecula Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attention: City Manager To Consultant: Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. 517 Fourth Avenue, Suite 301 San Diego, California 92101 Attention: Charles R. Spinks, Associate 15. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant. `16. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the perCormance of the services described in this Agreement. '17. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 18. PROHIBITED INTEREST. Noofficer, oremployeeoftheCityofTemecula shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Contractor, or Contractor's sub-contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's sub-contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 20. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Attest: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. 517 Fourth Ave., Suite 301 San Diego, CA 92101 (619) 234-9411 Jim R. Roberts, Senior Vice President Charles R. Spinks, Associate (Signatures of two corporate officers required for Corporations) 8 EXHIBIT A TASKS TO BE PERFORMED 9 ~]ll~ Kimley-Horn and Associates, inc. Scope of Work Diaz Road Extension and Alignment Study January 25, 2001 (Rev No. 4) Project Approach and Work Plan The proposed project consists of an alignment study for Diaz Road between Dendy Way and the City limits as well as a bridge study for crossing over Murrieta Creek north of Winchester Road. The length of the Diaz Road extension is approximately one mile. The purpose of the Diaz Road extension alignment study is to identify a specific horizontal and vertical alignment that will connect the existing Diaz Road in Temecula with Washington Avenue in Murrieta, or with a bridge crossing near Cherry Street, or with both. The alignment study will also establish right-of-way for future development. The bridge would provide an alternative east/west crossing of the creek. Diaz Road is classified as a four lane major street with a I00 foot right-of-way. The bridge width is estimated to be 72 feet. The key issues/challenges that will be faced on this project include: Finding a bridge alignment that will minimize impacts to the future U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) project. For the area between Winchester and the city limits (Cherry Street), the COE is proposing a detention basin that will serve as an ecological restoration area and public park. The width of the restoration area and park is from Diaz Road to Jefferson Avenue. Coordinating with Caltrans on the current 1-15 PSR that will establish a new freeway interchange north of Winchester Road. The bridge crossing should ultimately tie into the new interchange. Selecting the bridge type. We need to design a bridge that is aesthetically pleasing, minimizes environmental impacts and can be constructed within budget. The following describes the purpose, methodology, and deliverables for each major task. 1. Surveying and Mapping A two part mapping effort is proposed for this project. The first part will be to obtain 1"=100' topographic mapping with one-foot contours for a larger study area that will cover an area from Jefferson Avenue on the west to 100 feet east of Diaz Road and from Winchester Road on the south to 500 feet north of the City limits on the north. Field surveys will be performed to establish control for the mapping. Existing right-of-way where required will be added to the mapping. The right-of- way will include easements from City-provided title reports, and any irrevocable offers of dedication, COE land, and privately held land. This mapping will be utilized for the alternative identification and analysis portion of the project. Page 1 of 6 01/30/01 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. After the preferred altemative is selected, an 1"=40' topographic map with one-foot contours could be developed as additional services. Field survey could also be preformed as additional services to tie in visible utilities, existing Diaz Road and to establish temporary bench marks. For this proposal we are assuming that the length of the preferred alternative will be no greater than 7500 feet. 2. Reconnaissance The project team will conduct a preliminary reconnaissance of the study area to identify local environmental conditions. This preliminary reconnaissance will address all environmental and engineering issues relevant to the proposed project. 2. 1 Environmental Analysis KEA Environmental, Inc. will be responsible for the environmental analysis of this project. KEA recently prepared the Draft EIS/EIR for the Murrieta Creek Flood Control Project for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) and the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC & WCD). The Draft EIS/EIR was released for public review on Friday, July 14, and the public comment period extended through August 21, 2000. KEA submitted the Final EIS/EIR to the COE in September 2000. Much of this information will be used for this study. Initial Assessment of Required Permits KEA Environmental (KEA) will investigate all required permits for the Diaz Road Extension Project. It is anticipated that the project would require a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineer's Regulatory Branch, a Section 1601 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game, and Section 401 Water Quality Certification, or waiver, from the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). KEA will document the project's permit requirements in a memorandum to the City of Temecula. This memorandum will include a description of the survey requirements, timing constraints, and other pertinent information for each required permit. This scope of work does not include an impact analysis for final design of the road alternatives. Also, this scope of work does not include preparation of the permit application packages and negotiations with the resource agencies that may be needed to finalize and acquire the permits. Biological Resources KEA will identify critical habitat that could be potentially affected by the extension of Diaz Road and construction of a new bridge across Murrieta Creek. It is unlikely that "critical habitat" as defined in the Endangered Species Act would be affected; however, sensitive habitat such as wetland/riparian vegetation would probably be affected by the project. Existing technical studies, including the Murrieta Creek Flood Control Project EIS/EIR, will be reviewed to assess known biological data for the project vicinity, and the likelihood for occurrence of sensitive species. KEA biologists will then conduct a field assessment of the area of potential affect (APE). The survey will focus on an assessment of the suitability of the area to support sensitive biological resources. Any sensitive species detected will be noted and mapped. The type, quality, extent, and connectivity of native habitat in the survey area adjacent to native habitat will also be noted. Vegetation communities and sensitive species observations will be recorded on an APE base map (electronic files or topography and orthophotography) provided by the City. KEA will provide the City with a memorandum documenting and describing any sensitive habitat within the APE. A biological constraints map will be prepared as part of the overall alignment study. Neither focused surveys or wetland delineations will be conducted under this scope of work. Page 2 of 6 01/30/01 ~ll~ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Environmental Mitigation Cost Estimates KEA will prepare a matrix identifying the anticipated environmental mitigation costs associated with the three alignments. This matrix will list the mitigation features that would be anticipated for each alignment including the cost per item and the basis for each estimate. A summary comparison of the mitigation features and costs associated with each alignment will also be provided. Because the scope of work does not include final impact analyses, KEA will determine the mitigation needs based on a rough estimate of the impacts calculated from the biology constraints map and alternative road alignments. The project site will be evaluated to determine generally whether, and to what degree, mitigation can be accomplished onsite; however, an assessment of offsite mitigation options is not included in this scope of work. Therefore, the matrix and summary comparison of the mitigation associated with the alternative alignments will be based on the estimated extent of impacts, typical mitigation ratios, and average habitat-based mitigation costs per KEA's in-house experience. 2.2 Geotechnical The geologic reconnaissance report will include research and field studies to prepare a summary of the geologic condition and provide a general evaluation of the geologic hazards. Specifically, we propose to perform the following: · Review published geologic maps, aerial photographs, and other literature pertaining to the study area available in-house and/or at the City of Temecula to aid in evaluating geologic hazards and characterizing the geologic subsurface conditions. · Conduct a geologic site reconnaissance to visually map the exposed surficial site conditions and verify data derived from the research efforts. · Prepare a written report to be utilized by the project civil engineer and structural engineer in evaluating the impact of the geologic setting on the roadway and bridge alignment alternatives. The report will discuss and identify geologic groundwater, scour potential and remedial grading, as well as provide preliminary design parameters for roadway pavement sections and bridge foundation. Provide supplemental geotechnical engineering consultation on an as-requested basis as required by other design team consultants or the City of Temecula. 2.3 Data Collection We will obtain and review technical and other background information pertinent to the project. Site visits will verify existing improvements and utilities. The data that will be collected includes, but is not limited to, COE Murrieta Creek technical studies, base mapping, drainage studies, utility as- builts, streets as-builts, and existing right-of-way records. 2.4 Traffic Impacts Traffic will be assessed for each alternative including length of travel, travel speeds, potential impacts to business including pedestrian and vehicle access, and sight distance analysis demonstrating adequate sight distance along each alignment and at new intersections. 2.5 Design Criteria This task will evaluate existing technical and other background information and establish design criteria to guide the project delivery, identifying opportunities and constraints in developing the preferred alternative. Page 3 of 6 01/30/01 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Design criteria will be established to guide the design of Diaz Road and associated bridge. The criteria will include geometric design, design speeds, drainage, grading, safety and operational, utilities, and conformance with City of Temecula/Mumeta and other regional standards. Typical sections will be completed to identify roadway and parkway widths, building set-backs, and side slope grading. 3. Planning Study 3.1 Alternative Identification The KHA team will use the information obtained in the previous task to develop and analyze three preliminary design alternatives and the no build alternative. Three Alignment Alternatives · Extend Diaz Road to Cherry Street (city limits) and provide a bridge crossing along Cherry Street south of the city limits. · Extend Diaz Road and provide a bridge crossing for Dendy Parkway/Diaz Road Intersection which crosses the proposed Ecological Restoration Area. · Extend Diaz Road and provide a curved bridge crossing from the Dendy Parkway/Diaz Road intersection to Cherry Street to minimize impact to the proposed Ecological Restoration Area. The alternatives will be laid out in AutoCAD 2000 using topographic mapping, the established design criteria, typical sections, and opportunity and constraints mapping. The design will include horizontal location, right-of-way limits and typical sections. Each altemative will be drawn on the topographic mapping at a scale of 1"=100'. The proposed alignment study for Diaz Road will include a bridge crossing of Murrieta Creek. It is anticipated that the bridge will be approximately 72' wide and length would vary for different crossing locations and alignments. Structure types will be studied that consider the roadway requirements, site geology and bridge impacts on the environment and hydraulics of the channel. For this phase of the project, planning studies for one alignment will be provided. The planning studies will include preliminary plan showing bridge plan, elevation and typical section, and preliminary cost estimate for construction. 3.2 Drainage/Hydrology/Hydraulic Analysis The study area is adjacent to the reach of Murrieta Creek which includes the proposed detention basin. Diaz Road and the adjacent developed areas will drain into Murrieta Creek. This should not be a problem during most of the year when the flows are low, but when flood flows fill the detention basin, the water surface elevations in the detention basin which is surrounded by levees, could be higher than the adjacent developed areas. This may require local drainage to either be pumped into the Creek or carried in storm drains downstream to a location where the flows can flow by gravity into the Creek. Page 4 of 6 01/30/01 ~]~ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. The industrial area to the West of Murrieta Creek will not drain into the CEO project channel during periods of high flow, so a preliminary analysis will be prepared to present drainage alternatives along Diaz Road. Kimley-Horn and Associates will prepare a hydrologic study of the adjacent, tributary areas that will address the alternatives for drainage during storm flows. Hydrologic and hydraulic analyses will be prepared for a local drainage system that will function during flood flows. KHA will review the Corps of Engineers hydraulics in Murrieta Creek and will also review the Corps routing of flows through the detention basin. Flood flows that are greater than the design capacity of the proposed improvements will flow over an emergency spillway on the right bank of the Creek adjacent to Diaz Road and will flood the adjacent areas. It is probably not feasible to design a local drainage system to handle these flows. Additional hydraulic analysis will be prepared that will address the potential hydraulic impact of encroaching abutments, realigned levees, bridge piers, and scour. Every effort will be made to provide facilities and structures that do not impact the water surface elevations upstream fi.om the crossing. Close coordination with the Army Corps, Riverside County Flood Control District and the City of Murrieta will be required. 3.3 Alternative Analysis The alternative analysis will focus on the following: 1. Environmental Impacts 2. Conformance to design criteria 4. Costs 5. Right-of-way The biological analysis would include discussions on wetlands, sensitive species issues, and on-site mitigation under the proposed design alternatives. The alternative analysis report will also discuss sensitive vegetation/habitat types, and CEQA sensitive species, which are present or highly likely to be present on site. The analysis will identify conformance of the current site condition with those identified as part of the COE Murrieta Creek improvements, with alternatives for avoiding significant impacts to biological resources. In working within the right-of-way and environmental constraints, it is quite possible that the design of the roadway might not conform to all design criteria. In previous projects, we have avoided biological as well as cultural resources and significant right-of-way impacts by using non-standard design elements such as steeper vertical grades, smaller radius horizontal curvature with super- elevation, steeper side slopes and narrow parkways. This criteria will evaluate the safety and operational aspects of non-standard design features. Costs will be developed for each alternative and will include: Construction Utility Relocation Bridge Costs Page 5 of 6 01/30/01 Kirnley-Horn and Associates, Inc. · Right-of-way (including land, improvements, relocation, condenmation, severance and good will). No appraisals are assumed. The costs will be derived using recent and relevant sale information. · Environmental Mitigation · Add-on (i.e., design, administration and contingencies) The preferred alternative will be submitted in AutoCAD 2000 format as well as on mylars. The alignment design will include a cover sheet, typical sections, and 1"=100' scale plan and profile sheets. In coordination with Kimley-Hom and Associates, Simon Wong Engineering will determine the preliminary bridge length, width and location for the preferred alternative. A bridge planning study report will be prepared identifying potential structure types with recommendations for the structural materials, span layout and length, foundation type, railing type and architectural and aesthetic treatments. Included with the report will be a preliminary general plan of the bridge showing the information listed above and a preliminary opinion of probably construction cost. For the preferred alternative, Kimley-Hom and Associates will prepare right-of-way documents that will include: Research public records for recorded maps, assessors maps, etc Compile a base map of the proposed corridor from record data. This base map will be used to determine new fight-of-way requirements and be the basis of individual dedication plats. Create dedication plats, legal descriptions and grant deeds for up to 25 new right-of-way parcels. We are assuming that the City will provide all title reports. Deliverables (5 copies of each) · Opportunity and Constraints Mapping · Design Criteria Technical Memorandum · Geotechnical Description Base Mapping Blueline prints of the preferred alternative. Digital files of preferred alignment as AutoCAD 2000 drawings. Right-of-way plats. Scope Exclusions: Geotechnical investigations including borings. Right-of-way negotiations Traffic counts Environmental documentation/technical studies/permits Final design/construction. Construction administration. City Council meetings/presentations All outside agency coordination will be done by City staff. P:~^m~r.rsG~Di~_Roaaxs~o~ ofWo~ r~v n.~ Page 6 of 6 01/30/01 EXHIBIT B PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULF KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE Effective February 1, 2001 - December 31, 2001 OFFICE PRINCIPAL ..................................................................................................................................... $175.00 PROJECT MANAGER .................................................................................................................... $155.00 SENIOR PROFESSIONAL .............................................................................................................. $130.00 PROJECT ENGINEER .................................................................................................................... $100.00 ASSOCIATE ENGINEER ................................................................................................................ $ 90.00 CADD OPERATOR ......................................................................................................................... $ 85.00 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER ....................................................................................................... $ 85.00 SUPPORT STAFF ........................................................................................................................... $ 70.00 FIELD TWO-PERSON SURVEY PARTY ................................................................................................... $185.00 ~V:)ADRE\VOL1 ~P'DRIVE~MARKET-ING~DIAZ-ROAD'~ATE SCHEDULE.DOC Rev 02/01/01 ITEM 5 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~2~<~ DIRECTOR OF FINANCE' y,~ CITY MANAGER ~ I'~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Herman Parker, Director of Community Services/;~. March 27, 2001 SB 332 Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Abatement Funding Request PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Barbara Smith, Management Analyst That the City Council adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2001 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING AN ANNUAL SUBMITFAL OF A FUNDING REQUEST FOR A SB-332 BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING AND LI'I-rER ABATEMENT GRANT DISCUSSION: Senate Bill 332 provides for per capita grant funding to California cities and counties for beverage container recycling and litter abatement programs. The City of Temecula's eligible funding amount from SB 332 for Fiscal Year 2001-02 is $15,471. This amount will increase each year in proportion to the growth of the City of Temecula's population. The grant requires a Resolution adopted by the City Council. The application packet is due to the Department of Conservation's Division of Recycling by the end of April each year. Each year staff will identify programs, goods and services that have a primary emphasis on the collection and recycling of beverage containers, public education and litter prevention and or abatement in public places. Each year staff will evaluate current programs and expand the programs as needed and as additional funding is provided by this grant. Staff will also explore and purchase goods that will assist in the collection of recyclable beverage containers and litter for our City parks and facilities. FISCAL IMPACT: Receipt of this grant funding will provide for City-specific programs and goods aimed at recycling and litter abatement. R:~smithb~AB 332\Staff Repo[t AB332-New.doc RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING AN ANNUAL SUBMITTAL OF A FUNDING REQUEST FOR A SB-332 BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING AND LITTER ABATEMENT GRANT THE CITY COUNCILOF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act that provides funds to cities and counties for beverage container recycling and litter cleanup activities; and WHEREAS, The California Department of Conservation's Division of Recycling has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the program within the State, setting up necessary procedures for cities and counties or their designees under the program; and WHEREAS, per Section 14581 (a)(4)(E) of the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act, the eligible participant must submit the Funding Request Form by the due date and time in order to request funds from the Department of Conservation's Division of Recycling. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Temecula authorizes the submittal of the Funding Request Form to the Department of Conservation's Division of Recycling. The City Manager, is hereby authorized and empowered to execute in the name of the City of Temecula all necessary forms hereto for the purposes of securing payments and to implement and carry out the purposes specified in the Section 14581 (a)(4)(A) of the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act and provide information regarding this program to the Department of Conservation's Division of Recycling upon request. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on March 27, 2001. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL.] Resos\01- 1 STATE Of CALIFORNIA ) COUNTYOF RIVERSIDE ) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 01- was duly adopted at the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 27th day of March, 2001 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:~Resos City Council~SB-332.doc 03/21/2001 ITEM 6 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/~:~I CITY MANAGER ~------I William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer March 27, 2001 Tract No. 23209 - Subdivision Agreement PREPARED BY: Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Approve the Subdivision Agreement and accept the Performance Bond security to guarantee the performance of the SUBDIVIDER under this agreement. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract No. 23209 is a 220 lot Subdivision at the easterly extension of La Serena Way at Butterfield Stage Road. The tentative map was originally approved by City Council June 9, 1992. There have been several extensions of time to the map. The current tentative map extension will expire on June 9, 2001. Condition #33 requires that the Developer prior to Final Map recordation, participate in and pay their fair share in an Assessment District or other public financing mechanism to provide access to the project via Butterfield Stage Road and Nicholas Road prior to recording the final map for this subdivision. The City is currently processing the formation of a Community Facility District (CFD) to improve Butterfield Stage Road and the Developer has limited control over the timing of the District's formation. This creates a problem that the developer may not be able to fulfill Condition #33 before his map expires. The intent of Condition #33 was to provide access to the site without adding project traffic and disturbing existing residents adjacent to the new subdivision. Since the Tentative Map was approved the Developer has provided right of way for the extension of La Serena Way and Waicott Road, which have been improved providing access to this project without impacting the adjacent residents. This new Subdivision Agreement commits the Developer to participate in the CFD or if the CFD is not formed, the Developer is required to complete the westerly two lanes of Butterfieid Stage Road from the southeasterly boundary of Tr. No. 23209 south to Chemin Clinet Road. R:~AGD RPT~2001\0327~Tr.23209 Agreement.doc 1 The attached agreement is the City's Standard Subdivision Agreement modified to satisfy the intent of Condition Cf 33. If the CFD is formed this agreement will become null and void. The Developer will post a Performance Bond of approximately $660,000 guaranteeing that these improvements will be built if the CFD is not formed. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 2. 3. 4. Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tr. No 23209 Performance Bonds, Offsite Improvements to Butterfield Stage Rd Vicinity Map Tract Map 23209 Tentative Map Condition Cf33 R:~AG DRPT~2001~0327\Tr.23209 Agreement.doc 2 City of Temecula Subdivision Improvement Agreement Page 1 Recording Requested by City of Temecula When recorded mail to: City of Temecula Office of the City Clerk Post Office Box 9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92589-9033 CITY OF TEMECULA SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT DATE OF AGREEMENT: March 27, 2001 NAME OF SUBDIVIDER: NAME OF SUBDIVISION: TRACT NO.: La Verda E'Mond Trust and Barbara J. French (referred to as "SUBDIVIDER") Tract No. 23209 (referred to as "SUBDIVISION") 23209 OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS TENTATIVE MAP RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL NO.: (referred to as "Resolution or Approval") IMPROVEMENT PLANS NO.: To be Provided By SUBDIVIDER if required (referred to as "Improvement Plans") ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENTS: $ 660,000 ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF MONUMENTATION: $ N/A COMPLETION DATE: To Be Determined NAME OF SURETY AND BOND NO. FOR LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND: NAME OF SURETY AND BOND NO. FOR FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND: R:Lagmts~dagmts\Trac123209 Agmt City of Temecula Subdivision Improvement Agreement Page 2 This agreement is made and entered into by and between the City ofTemecula, Califomia, a Municipal Corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as CITY, and the SUBDIVIDER. RECITALS SUBDIVIDER has presented to CITY for approval and recordation, a final subdivision map of a proposed subdivision pursuant to provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State o£Califomia and the CITY ordinances and regulations relating to the filing, approval and recordation of subdivision maps. The Subdivision Map Act and the CITY ordinances and regulations relating to the filing, approval and recordation of subdivision maps are collectively referred to in this agreement as the "Subdivision Laws". A tentative map of the SUBDIVISION has been approved, subject to the Subdivision Laws and to the requirements and conditions contained in the Resolution of Approval. The Resolution of Approval is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and is incorporated into this Agreement by reference. The Subdivision Laws establish as a condition precedent to the approval of a final map that SUBDIVIDER must have complied with the Resolution of Approval and must have either (a) completed, in compliance with CITY standards, all of the improvements and land development work required by the Subdivision Laws and the Resolution of Approval or, (b) have entered into a secured agreement with CITY to complete the improvements and land development within a period of time specified by CITY. In consideration of approval of a final map for the SUBDIVISION by the City Council, SUBDIVIDER desires to enter into this agreement, whereby SUBDIVIDER promises to participate in an Assessment District or other public financing mechanism in order to pay a fair share of the costs and improvements for Butterfield Stage Road and La Serena Way as the satisfaction of condition number 33 of the Conditions of Approval of the Tentative Map. In the event that a public financing mechanism is not established, the SUBDIVIDER promises to install and complete, at SUBDIVIDER'S own expense, all the public improvement work required by City in connection with this Agreement. SUBDIVIDER has secured this agreement by improvement security required by the Subdivision Laws and approved by the City Attorney. .Complete Improvement Plans for the construction, installation and completion of the ~mprovements will be prepared by SUBDIVIDER and approved by the City Engineer if the referenced improvements become necessary. All references in this agreement to the Improvement Plans shall include reference to any specifications for the improvements as approved by the City Engineer. R:~agmt s~dagmts[Tract 23209 Agmt City of Temecula Subdivision Improvement Agreement Page 3 An estimate of the cost of construction of the public improvements and performing land development work in connection with the improvements according to the Improvement Plans has been made and had been approved by the City Engineer. The estimated amount is stated on Page 1 of this agreement. The basis for the estimate is attached as Exhibit "A" to this agreement. The CITY has adopted standards for the construction and installation of improvements withiri the CITY. The Improvement Plans will be prepared in conformance with the CITY standards in effect on the date of approval of the Resolution of Approval. SUBDIVIDER recognizes that by approval of the final map for SUBDIVISION, CITY has conferred substantial rights upon SUBDIVIDER, including the right to sell, lease, or finance lots within the SUBDIVISION, and has taken the final act necessary to subdivide the property within the SUBDIVISION. As a result, CITY will be damaged to the extent of the cost of installation of the improvements by SUBDIVIDER'S failure to perform its obligations under this agreement, including, but not limited to, SUBDIVIDER'S obligation to complete construction of the improvements by the time established in this agreement. CITY shall be entitled to all remedies available to it pursuant to this agreement and the Subdivision Laws in the event of a default by SUBDIVIDER. It is specifically recognized that the determination of whether a reversion to acreage or rescission of the SUBDIVISION constitutes an adequate remedy for default by the SUBDIVIDER shall be within the sole discretion of CITY. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the approval and recordation by the City Council of the final map of the SUBDIVISION, SUBDIVIDER and CITY agree as follows: Formation ofPublicFinancing. SUBDIVIDER shall, as satisfaction of condition number 33 of the Resolution of Approval, participate in the formation of an assessment district or other public financing mechanism established by CITY, the County of Riverside and other property owners for the improvement and/or construction of Butterfield Stage Road, Nicolas Road, and La Serena Way. The SUBDIVIDER shall pay for its fair share in such assessment district or other public financing mechanism formed to provide the improvement. The entering into this Agreement by the SUBDIVIDER does not alter SUBDIVIDER'S obligations for payment of its fair share under the Assessment District, or other Public Financing mechanism, as determined by the Assessment Engineer. Public Financing Contingency. In the event that the public financing (as set out above) has not been established prior to December 31, 2002, SUBDIVIDER shall improve Butterfield Stage Road to its full half-width from Chemin Clinet, northerly to where the Butterfield Stage Road westerly right-of-way meets Tract 23209. All of such improvements shall be completed in accordance with plans and specifications City of Temecula Subdivision Improvement Agreement Page 4 approved by the City of Temecula. Security. To guarantee SUBDIVIDER'S performance under this Agreement, SUBDIVIDER shall furnish to CITY a good and sufficient security on forms approved by CITY in the following amounts: a. $375,049.00 - for the estimated costs of the improvements form the centerline ofChemin Clinet northerly to the centerline of Ahem Lane; and $284,855.00 - for the estimated costs of the improvements from the centerline of Ahern Lane northerly to the improved portion adjacent to Tract 23209 completed as a requirement of Tract 23209. The securities required by this agreement shall be kept on file with the City Clerk. The terms of the security documents referenced on Page 1 of this agreement are incorporated into this agreement by this reference. If any security is replaced by another approved security, tl~e replacement shall be filed with the City Clerk and, upon filing, shall be deemed to have been made a part of and incorporated into tl~is agreement. Upon filing of a replacement security with the City Clerk, the former security may be released. 4. Fee Credit. In the event the SUBDIVIDER completes the improvements of Butterfield Stage Road as described in paragraph 3(a) and (b) above, then CITY shall grant SUBDIVIDER a Development Impact Fee credit for all capital improvement work in accordance with the Development Impact Fee Ordinance adopted by CITY under Ordinance Number 15.06.04(A) in the amount of $165,224.40 (220 lots x $751.02 = $165,224.40); and/or CITY shall consider granting SUBDIVIDER credit under the appropriate fee ordinance then in effect for the balance. 5. Inspection. SUBDIVIDER shall at all times maintain proper facilities and safe access for inspection of the public improvements by CITY inspector and to the shops wherein any work is in preparation. Upon completion of the work the SUBDIVIDER may request a final inspection by the City Engineer, or the designated representative, determine that the work has been completed in accordance with this agreement, then the City Engineer shall certify the completion of the public improvements to the City Council. No improvements shall be finally accepted unless all aspects of the work have been inspected and determined to have been completed in accordance with the Improvement Plans and CITY standards. SUBDIVIDER shall bear all costs of inspection and certification. 6. Release of Securities. Subject to approval by the City Council of CITY, the securities required by the Agreement, and SUBDIVIDER'S under this Agreement shall be released as follows: Either one or both of the securities given for faithful performance of improvement work shall be released upon the final completion and acceptance of the act or work; or R:~agmts~l dagmts\Trac123209 Agmt City of Temecula Subdivision Improvement Agreement Page 5 b. Either one or both of the securities given for faithful performance of improvement work shall be released upon the deliver to CITY of another good and sufficient security on forms approved by CITY in satisfactory amount or amounts; or c. The formation of the assessment district or other public financing mechanism originally anticipated, as set out above in Paragraph 1. The CITY may retain from any security released, an amount sufficient to cover costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorneys' fees. Iniury to Public Improvements, Public Property or Public Utilities Facilities. SUBDIVIDER shall replace or have replaced, or repair or have repaired, as the case may be, all public improvements, public utilities facilities and surveying or subdivision monuments which are destroyed or damaged as a result of any work under this agreement. SUBDIVIDER shall bear the entire cost of replacement or repairs of any and all public or public utility property damaged or destroyed by reason of any work done under this agreement, whether such property is owned by the United States or any agency thereof, or the State of California, or any agency or political subdivision thereof, or by the CITY or any public or private utility corporation or by any combination of such owners. Any repair or replacement shall be to the satisfaction, and subject to the approval, of the City Engineer. Permits. SUBDIVIDER shall, at SUBDIVIDER'S expense, obtain all necessary permits and licenses for the construction and installation of the improvements, give all necessary notices and pay all fees and taxes required by law. Default of SUBDIVIDER. Default of SUBDIVIDER shall include, but not be limited to, SUBDIVIDER'S failure to timely commence construction of this agreement; SUBDIVIDER'S failure to timely complete construction of the improvements; SUBDIVIDER'S failure to timely cure any defect in the improvements; SUBDIVIDER'S failure to perform substantial construction work for a period of 20 calendar days after commencement of the work; SUBDIVIDER'S insolvency, appointment of a receiver, or the filing of any petition in bankruptcy either voluntary or involuntary which SUBDIVIDER fails to discharge within thirty (30) days; the commencement of a foreclosure action against the SUBDIVISION or a portion thereof, or any conveyance in lieu or in avoidance of foreclosure; or SUBDIVIDER'S failure to perform any other obligation under this agreement. b. The CITY reserves to itself all remedies available to it at law or in equity for R:~agmta~l dagmts\Tract 23209 Agmt City of Temecula Subdivision Improvement Agreement Page 6 breach of SUBDIVIDER'S obligations under this agreement. The CITY shall have the right, subject to this section, to draw upon or utilize the appropriate security to mitigate CITY damages in event of default by SUBDIVIDER. The right of CITY to draw upon or utilize the security is additional to and not in lieu of any other remedy available to CITY. It is specifically recognized that the estimated costs and security amounts may not reflect the actual cost of construction or installation of the improvements and, therefore, CITY damages for SUBDIVIDER'S default shall be measured by the cost of completing the required improvements. The sums provided by the improvement security may be used by CITY for the completion of the public improvements in accordance with the improvement plans and specifications contained herein. In the event of SUBDIVIDER'S default under this agreement, SUBDIVIDER authorizes CITY to perform such obligation twenty days after mailing written notice of default to SUBDIVIDER and to SUBDIVIDEWS Surety, and agrees to pay the entire cost of such performance by CITY. CITY may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion, by contract or by any other method CITY may deem advisable, for the account and at the expense of SUBDIVIDER, and SUBDIVIDER'S Surety shall be liable to CITY for any excess cost or damages occasioned CITY thereby; and, in such event, CITY, without liability for so doing, may take possession of, and utilize in completing the work, such materials, appliances, plant and other property belonging to SUBDIVIDER as may be on the site of the work and necessary for performance of the work. Failure of SUBDIVIDER to comply with the terms of this agreement shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY ora notice of violation against all the lots in the SUBDIVISION, or to rescind the approval or otherwise revert the SUBDIVISION to acreage. The remedy provided by this Subsection c is in addition to and not in lieu of other remedies available to CITY. SUBDIVIDER agrees that the choice of remedy or remedies for SUBDIVIDER'S breach shall be in the discretion of CITY. In the event that SUBDIVIDER fails to perform any obligation hereunder, SUBDIVIDER agrees to pay all costs and expenses incurred by CITY in securing performance of such obligations, including costs of suit and reasonable attorney's fees. The failure of CITY to take an enforcement action with respect to a default, or to declare a breach, shall not be construed as a waiver of that default or breach or any subsequent default or breach of SUBDIVIDER. 10. Warranty. SUBDIVIDER shall guarantee or warranty the work done pursuant to City of Temecula Subdivision Improvement Agreement Page 7 this agreement for a period of one year after final acceptance by the City Council of the work and improvements against any defective work or labor done or defective materials furnished. Where certain improvements are to be constructed in phases or sections, the one year warrant period shall commence after City acceptance of the last completed improvement. If within the warranty period any work or improvement. If within the warranty period any work or improvement or part of any work or improvement done, fumished, installed, constructed or caused to be done, fumished, installed or constructed by SUBDIVIDER fails to fulfill any of the requirements of this agreement or the improvement plans and specifications referred to herein, SUBDIVIDER shall without delay and without any cost to CITY, repair or replace or reconstruct any defective or otherwise unsatisfactory part or parts of the work or structure. Should SUBDIVIDER fail to act promptly or in accordance with this requirement, SUBDIVIDER hereby authorizes CITY at CITY option, to perform the work twenty days after mailing written notice of default to SUBDIVIDER and to SUBDIVIDER'S and agrees to pay the cost of such work by CITY. Should the CITY determine that an urgency requires repairs or replacements to be made before SUBDIVIDER can be notified, CITY may, in its sole discretion, make the necessary repairs or replacement or perform the necessary work and SUBDIVIDER shall pay to CITY the cost of such repairs. 11. SUBDIVIDER Not Agent of CITY. Neither SUBDIVIDER nor any of SUBDIVIDER'S agents or contractors are or shall be considered to be agents of CITY in connection with the performance of SUBDIVIDER'S obligations under this agreement. 12. Iniury to Work. Until such time as the improvements are accepted by CITY, SUBDIVIDER shall be responsible for and bear the risk of loss to any of the improvements constructed or installed. Until such time as all improvements required by this agreement are fully completed and accepted by CITY, SUBDIVIDER will be responsible for the care, maintenance of, and any damage to such improvement. CITY shall not, nor shall any officer or employee thereof, be liable or responsible for any accident, loss or damage, regardless of cause, happening or occurring to the work or improvements specified in this agreement prior to the completion and acceptance of the work or improvements. All such risks shall be the responsibility of and are hereby assumed by SUBDIVIDER. 13. Other Agreements. Nothing contained in this agreement shall preclude CITY from expending monies pursuant to agreements concurrently or previously executed between the parties, or from entering into agreements with other subdividers for the apportionment of costs of water and sewer mains, or other improvements, pursuant to the provisions of the CITY ordinance providing therefore, nor shall anything in this agreement commit CITY of any such apportionment. 14. SUBDIVIDER'S OBLIGATION TO WARN PUBLIC DURING CONSTRUCTION. Until final acceptance of the improvements, SUBDIVIDER shall give good and R:Lagm~s~ldagmts\Tract 23209 Agmt City of Temecula Subdivision Improvement Agreement Page 8 adequate warning to the public of each and every dangerous condition existent in said improvements, and will take all reasonable actions to protect the public from such dangerous condition. 15. Vesting of Ownership. Upon acceptance of the work on behalf of CITY and recordation of the Notice of Completion, ownership of the improvements constructed pursuant to this agreement shall vest in CITY. 16. Final Acceptance of Work. Acceptance of the work on behalf of CITY shall be made by City Council upon recommendation of the City Engineer after final completion and inspection of all improvements. The City Council shall act upon the Engineer's recommendation within thirty (30) days from the date the City Engineer certifies that the work has been finally completed, as provided in Paragraph 5. Such acceptance shall not constitute a waiver of defects by CITY. 17. Indemnity/Hold Harmless. CITY or any officer or employee thereof shall not be liable for any injury to persons or property occasioned by reason of the acts or omissions of SUBDIVIDER, its agents or employees in the performance of this agreement. SUBDIVIDER further agrees to protect and hold harmless CITY, its officials and employees from any and all claims, demands, causes or action, liability or loss of any sort, because of, or arising out of, acts or omissions of SUBDIVIDER, its agents or employees in the performance of this agreement, including all claims, demands, causes of action, liability, or loss because of, or arising out of, in whole or in part, the design or construction of the improvements. This indemnification and agreement to hold harmless shall extend to injuries to persons and damages or taking of property resulting from the design or construction of said subdivision, and the public improvements as provided herein, and in addition, to adjacent property owners as a consequence of the diversion of waters from the design or construction of public drainage systems, streets and other public improvements. Acceptance by the CITY of the improvements shall not constitute an assumption by the CITY of any responsibility for any damage or taking covered by this paragraph. CITY shall not be responsible for the design or construction of the subdivision or the improvements pursuant to the approved improvement plans or map, regardless of any negligent action or inaction taken by the CITY in approving the plans or map, unless the particular improvement design was specifically required by CITY over written objection by SUBDIVIDER submitted to the City Engineer before approval of the particular improvement design, which objection indicated that the particular improvement design was dangerous or defective and suggested an alternative safe and feasible design. After acceptance of the improvements, the SUBDIVIDER shall remain obligated to eliminate any defect in design or dangerous condition caused by the design or construction defect, however SUBDIVIDER shall not be responsible for routine maintenance. Provisions of this paragraph shall remain in full force and effect for ten years following the acceptance by the CITY of improvements. It is the intent of this section that SUBDIVIDER shall be responsible for all liability for design and City of Temecula Subdivision Improvement Agreement Page 9 construction of the improvements installed or work done pursuant to this agreement and that CITY shall not be liable for any negligence, nonfeasance, misfeasance or malfeasance in approving, reviewing, checking, or correcting any plans or specifications or in approving, reviewing or inspecting any work or construction. The improvement security shall not be required to cover the provisions of this paragraph: 18. Sale or Disposition of SUBDIVISION. Sale or other disposition of this property will not relieve SUBDIVIDER from the obligations set forth herein. If SUBDIVIDER sells the property or any portion of the property within the SUBDIVISION to any other person, the SUBDIVIDER may request a novation of this agreement and a substitution of security. Upon approval of the novation and substitution of securities, the SUBDIVIDER may request a release or reduction of the securities required by this agreement. Nothing in the novation shall relieve the SUBDIVIDER of the obligations under Paragraph 17 for the work or improvement done by SUBDIVIDER. 19. Time of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this agreement. 20. Time for Completion of Wor~Time Extensions. SUBDIVIDER shall complete construction of the improvements required by this agreement within eighteen (18) months of this agreement. In the event good cause exists as determined by the City Engineer, the time for completion of the improvements hereunder may be extended. The extension shall be made by writing executed by the City Engineer. Any such extension may be granted without notice to SUBDIVIDER's Surety and shall not affect the validity of this agreement or release the Surety or Sureties on any security given for this agreement. The City Engineer shall be the sole and final judge as to whether or not good cause has been shown to entitle SUBDIVIDER to an extension. Delay, other than delay in the commencement of work, resulting from an act of CITY, or by an act of God, which SUBDIVIDER could not have reasonable foreseen, or by storm or inclement weather which prevent the conducting of work, and which were not caused by or contributed to by SUBDIVIDER, shall constitute good cause for an extension of the time for completion. As a condition of such extension, the City Engineer may require SUBDIVIDER to furnish new security guaranteeing performance of this agreement as extended in an increased amount as necessary to compensate for any increase in construction costs as determined by the City Engineer. 21. No Vesting of Rights. Performance by SUBDIVIDER of this agreement shall not be construed to vest SUBDIVIDER'S rights with respect to any change in any zoning or building law or ordinance. 22. Notices. All notices required or provided for under this agreement shall be in writing and delivered in person or sent by mail, postage prepaid and addressed as provided in this Section. Notice shall be effective on the date it is delivered in City of Temecula Subdivision Improvement Agreement Page 10 person, or, if mailed, on the date of deposit in the United States Mail. Notices shall be addressed as follows unless a written change of address is filed with the City: Notice to CITY: City Engineer City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Dr. Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Notice to SUBDIVIDER: C/O Tony Angelica for: LaVerda E'Mond Trust 1850 Enterprise Way Monrovia, CA 91016-4271 23. Severability. The provisions of this agreement are severable. If any portion of this agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the agreement shall remain in full force and effect unless amended or modified by the mutual consent of the parties. 24. Captions. The captions of this agreement are for convenience and reference only and shall not define, explain, modify, limit, exemplify, or aid in the interpretation, construction or meaning of any provisions of this agreement. 25. Litigation or Arbitration. In the event that suit or arbitration is brought to enforce the terms of this contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to litigation costs and reasonable attorneys' fees. 26. 27. Incorporation of Recitals. The Recitals to this agreement are hereby incorporated into the terms of this agreement. Entire Agreement. This agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter. All modifications, amendments, or waivers of the terms of this agreement must be in writing and signed by the appropriate representatives of the parties. In the case of the CITY, the appropriate party shall be the City Manager. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement is executed by CITY, by and through its Mayor. SUBDIVIDER CITY OF TEMECULA By: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor City of Temecula Subdivision Improvement Agreement Page 11 Name: Tony Angelica for Title: Laverda E'Mond Trust By: Name: Title: Barbara J. French ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk (Proper Notarization of SUBDIVIDER's signature is required and shall be attached) RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: By: William G. Hughes Director of Public Works/City Engineer APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney Attachment 3 Vicinity Map Tentative Map 23209 R:~AG D RPT'~.001\0327~Tr.23209 Agreement.doc 3 Attachment 4 Tentative Map Condition #33 R:~AG D RPT~2001\0327~Tr.23209 Agreement.doc 4 32. Prior to the issuance of any occupancy permits the developer shall submit to the City a disclosure statement for the tract area which identifies the potential future impact of noise associated with the potential placement of wind machines at the adjacent vineyard. Said disclosure shall inform buyers that rights to protest have been waived by the developer. Said document shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney. Said approval shall be obtained prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. The City will require that said document will be submitted to and signed in agreement by future residential occupants. (Added at the Planning Commission meeting on March 16, 1992). DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Govemment Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of Public Works. It is understood that the Subdivider has correctly shown on the tentative map all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvements constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: 33. 34. "Prior to recordation of the final map, an Assessment Distdct or other public financing mechanism shall be established to address access to the area Trcct c~ong Buttedield Stage Road and Nicholas Road. The Subdivider shall participate in and pay for its fair share of any such Assessment Distdct or other public financing mechanism formed to'provide the improvements." (Amended at City Council August 11, 1992) As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho Califomia Water District; Eastern Municipal Water District; Riverside County Flood Control district; City of Temecula Fire Bureau; Planning Department; Department of Public Works; Riverside County Health Department; CATV Franchise; Parks and Recreation Department; and Metropolitan Water District. 35. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map A~t, any subdivision which is part of an existing Assessment District Must comply with the requirements of said section. 36. All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. \\TEMEC_FSIOI\VOLI~Dep~s\PLANNING\E 0 T~00-0155 TTM23209\I55PA00E COA.doc 8 City of Temecula 43200 Business P~e ~ P--"~"~'ox 9033 # Temecula # California 92589-9033 (909) 694-6400 #FAX (909) 694-6477 August 1, 2000 Tracy Wall SDI Communities, LLC 27431 Enterprise Circle West Temecula, CA 92590 RECEIVED AUG 0 3 2000 CiTY OF TE~ECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: Planning Director Approval and Final Conditions of Approval for Planning Application No. PA00-0155 (Extension of Time) - for Tentative Tract Map 23209 located east of the intersection of La Serena Way and Walcott Way along B utterfield. Dear Tracy: On July 13, 2000, the City of Temecula City Council Planning Director approved the above referenced project subject to the enclosed Conditions of Approval. Please review the final Conditions of Approval for the project and return a wet signed copy within three (3) working day of the receipt of this letter. This approval is effective until June 9, 2001, unless extended in accordance with the Development Code. Written request for a time extension must be submitted to the City of Temecula a minimum of 30 days prior to the expiration date. To further assist you in the timely completion of your project, we would encourage you to schedule a meeting with City staff to discuss these final conditions of approval. This meeting will provide you an opportunity to ask specific questions on the City's expectations or requirements. If you have any further questions regarding this subject or this approval, please contact me at (909) 694-6400. Sincerely, John De Gange, GIS Administrator cc: [!e~l,j P~l~ria,TDepartment of Public Works A-fithony Elrno/Building & Safety Department Herman Parker, Temecula Community Services District Norm Davidson, Riverside County Fire Department Rancho California Water District Ternecula Valley Unified School District Riverside County Flood Control Riverside County Health Department Temecula Police Department Eastern Municipal Water District Southern California Gas Company Southern California Edison Company Caltrans General Telephone Company F:\Depts\PLANNING\E O T~00-0155 TTM23209\155pa00 APPROVAL LTR.doc ITEM 7 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL J/~) CITY ATTORNEY ~ DIRECTOR OF FINANCE~ CITY MANAGER ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer March 27, 2001 Completion and Acceptance for Overland Drive Overcrossing at Interstate Route 15, Project No. PW95-11 PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Senior Engineer - Capital Projects Steven Beswick, Associate Engineer - Capital Projects Julie Dauer - CIP Specialist RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Accept the project "Overland Drive Overcrossing at Interstate Route 15, Project No. PW95- 11", as complete; and File a Notice of Completion, release the performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; and Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: On December 15, 1998, the City Council awarded a contract to C. C. Myers, Inc. for an amount of $6,008,546,20 to construct the Overland Drive Overcrossing at Interstate Route 15 (Project No. PW95-11). The project included a contingency amount of $600,854,62. The purpose of this project was to construct a new bridge over Interstate Route 15 and to reduce traffic on the Winchester Road and Rancho California Road 1-15 freeway interchanges. The general items of work that were completed, consisted of the following: Construct Overland Drive between Jefferson Avenue and Ynez Road including a bridge over Interstate Route 15, new traffic signals at Jefferson Avenue and Ynez Road, relocation and reconstruction of existing utilities; and landscape and irrigation improvements. C. C. Myers has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and has requested the City release the remaining retention to warranty retention per the contract. In February 1999, City Council authorized the Public Works Department to accelerate the project and as a result, the bridge dedication was held on October 22, 1999, opened to traffic on October 23, 1999, and completed prior to grand opening ceremony for the Promenade Mall held on October 27, 1999. R:~AG DRPT~2001 \0327\PW95-11 .ACC.DOC/ The remaining amount of retention to date is $671,216.71. In accordance with the contract specifications, we are required to withhold $65,835.46 for warranty retention for a period of one year. The City will release the remaining portion of retention, in the amount of $605,381.25 being held for this project, on or about (35) days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded. FISCAL IMPACT: The Overland Drive Overcrossing at Interstate Route 15 was funded with CFD 88-12, ISTEA/STP, Capital Project Reserves, Redevelopment Agency (RDA), and Developer Impact Fees. These funds have been appropriated from Account No. 210-165-604- 5804. The original contract amount for this project was $6,008,546.20. The final total contract amount is $6,712,167.07, which includes Contract Change Orders No. 1 thru 21 and the net of contract line item over runs and under runs. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Notice of Completion 2. Maintenance Bond 3. Contractor's Affidavit R:~AG DRPT~.001\0327\PW95-11.ACC.DOC/ RECO~UESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA P.O. Box 9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92589-9033 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 92590. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula C.C. Myers, Inc. to perform the following work of improvement: OVERLAND DRIVE OVERCROSSING AT INTERSTATE ROUTE 15 Project No. PW95-11 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on March 27, 2001. That upon said contract the American Home Assurance Company was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula,' County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT NO. PW 95-11. The project location is: Overland Drive at Interstate Route 15 within the City of Temecula Dated at Temecula, California, this 27~ day of March 2001. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk I, Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. Dated at Temecula, California, this 27th day of March 2001. Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk Bond # 079844-M Premium Included in Performance Bond CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE BOND PROJECT NO.= PW95- 11 OVERLAND DRIVE OVERCROSSING .4 T INTERST.4 TE ROUTE 15 KNOW ALL MEN By THESE PRESENTS THAT: C.C. Myers, Inc., 3286 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova,CA 95742 NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRA CTOR a Corporation (fill in whether a Corporation, Partnership or individual) , hereinafter called Principal, and American Home Assurance Company. Two RJncon Center. San Francisco,CA 94105 NAME AND ADDRESS OF SURETY hereinafter called SURETY, are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA, hereinafter called OWNER, in the penal sum of Six Hundred Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty Four DOLLARS and 62 CENT ($ 600,854.62 ) in lawful money of the United States, said sum being not less than tr percent (10%) of the Contract value payable by the said City of Temecula under the terms of t~ Contract, for the payment of which, we bind ourselves, successors and assigns, jointly ap severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into a certa Contract with the OWNER, dated the 23rd day of December , 19 98 , a copy of which hereto attached and made a part hereof for the construction of PROJECT NO. PW95-11 OVERLAE DRIVE OVERCROSSlNG AT INTERSTATE ROUTE 15. WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarant~ for the period of one year after recording the noticed of completion on said job, by the OWNE' against all defects in workmanship and rnateriaJs which may become apparent during said perio and WHEREAS, the said Contract has been completed, and was approved on March 27,2001 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if within one year fro, the date of approval of the said Contract, the work done under the terms of said Contract sh~ disclose poor workmanship in the execution of said work, and the carrying out of the terms of sa. Contract, or it shall appear that defective materials were furnished thereunder, then this obligatk shall remain in full force and virtue, otherwise this instrument shall be void. As a part Of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount spec[fie costs and reasonable expenses and fees shall be included, including reasonable attorneys' fe incurred by the City of Temecula in successfully enforcing this obligation, all to be taxed as cos and included in any judgment rendered. The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, ~xtension of time, alteration o, addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the work to be performed thereunder, or to thc specifications accompanying the same, shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and i- does hereby waive no~ice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the term.~ of the Contract, or to the work, or to the specifications. Signed and sealed this 5th day of March 2001 (Seal) SURETY /"} ~' /~ American ~o~ss~ran~/~Company Patti T. Mou~ha/n~--~ (Name) Attorney-in-Fact (Title) APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney PRINCIPAL C.C. ~¥$rs, (Nam~ (title) By:. (Name) (Title) State of California County of San Francisco On March 5, 2001 before me M. Moody, Notary Public personally ********************************* T. ************************* [] personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signatur!~ American llotne Assurance Company Nalio!ml Un,ion Fire Insurance Company of I~iltsburgh, Pa. Prhtcipal Bond Office: 70 Pine Street~ New York. N.y. 10270 liNOV¢ AI.E MEN IIY TIlL'SE PI,~ESENTS: I'O'~VER OF ATTORNEY No. 03-B-01107 Thal /\mcrican Honte Assurance Colllpall.v, a Nc~ York corporatioo, and Natiooa[ Union Fire insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., Pcnusyh,aoia corporation docs each hereby appoin! --- J. M. Albndn~ Palrick T. Moughan, M. Moody, William F. %Vard, ,Iovce Lee Kinney. Katheriue Tiberi: of San Francisco, California--- its true and lawfld Atlorne.¥(s)-in-Fact. widt full authority to execute on its behalf bonds, uodertakings, recognizances and other cootracts of indcnmh) arid wrilings obliga ory in the nature dtercof, issued in the course of its business, tod to bind the respective contpany thereby. IN' ',VFFNESS \VIIEF~EOF American Home Assurance Contpany and National Union Fire htsurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. have each execuled these preseuts this 16th da)' of October, 2000. ~t.~ ~V. C~rlstr~, Senior Vice President Nalional Uuion Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA. Vice President, American Home Assurance Company STATE OF NEW YORK } COUNTY OF NEW YORK }ss. On this I&h day of Oclober. 2000 before me came the above named officer of American Home Assurance Company and Nationnl Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., to me personall:, knov, n to be d~e individual and officer described herein. and z~chno~xlcdged ihlu he executed thc foregoing instrument and afi~:,.cd il~.- seals a! said corporations thereto by authorit? of his [ARA A. CARM/LI, N; Excerpts o~'::so' ,."'o,' :. adopted by. die Boards of Directors of America:~ florae Assurance Compan3 and Natio?.al 'umon' ' Fire Insura~,ce Company, ,-,f Pittsburgh, Pa. on May Ia, 1976: · "RESOLVED. that the signatures and attestations of such officers and tl~e seal of the Compan} max. be affixed to am.'. such Power of,-\ttornex, or to an5' certificate relating thereto b.', lhcs m lc. and an.,, such Po,.~er o1' Auome? or certificate bearin°-~ such facsimile signatures or l~csimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Conlpany when so affixed with respect to anv bond undertakinz, reco_onizance or other contract of mdemnilv or writino obligatory in the nature thereol~ ~ - = "RESOL'~'ED, that any such Attorney-in-Fac delivering a secretarial certification that the lbre~oin~ resolutions still be in efl~:ct may insert in such certification the date thereol; said date to be not later than the date of delivery thereof by such Auom~,,-in'~Fact.' I. Elizabeth M. Tuck. Secretary of American Home Assurance Company and of National Union Fire Insurance Compan.,. o' ~ittsburgh. Pa. do hereby certilV that the Ibregoing excerpts of Resolutions adopted by the Bonrds of Directors of these corporations, and the Powers of Attorne? issued pursuan the'fete, ar'e true and correct, and that both the I~,¢solutions and the Pox;ers of Attorney are itt fidl three and elect. IN X~ I'I'~,ESS WtlEI/EOI:. I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the thcsimil¢ seal of each corporation this 5th da.', of March . 2001 Elizabeth M. Tuck, Secretary 65166 (4/995 CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE PROJECT NO. PW95-11 OVERLAND DRIVE OVERCROSSING AT INTERSTATE ROUTE 15 This is to certify that C. C. Myers, Inc., (hereinafter the "CONTRACTOR") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that he/it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the CONTRACTOR or by any of the CONTRACTOR'S agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution of it's contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building, erection, construction, or repair of the certain work of improvement known as PROJECT NO. PW95-11 OVERLAND DRIVE OVERCROSSlNG AT INTERSTATE ROUTE 15 situated in the City of Temecuta, State of California, more particularly described as follows: PROJECT NO. PW95-11 OVERLAND DRIVE OVERCROSSING AT INTERSTATE ROUTE 15 The CONTRACTOR declares that the only balances unpaid are retentions due subcontractors in the following amounts: Barajas & Associates Able 2 Barricade American Concrete Marina Landscape Alcorn Fence Savala Construction Fontana Steel $3,737.00 $1,513.03 $13,551.52 834,878.10 $6,815.83 $25,366.11 $66,165.27 Traffic Operations $3,864.13 Romero General Const.$19,162.12 Hydro Sprout $567.91 Crown Fence 94,549.55 MBE Electric 98,889.81 AVAR Construction 96,239.39 Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the CONTRACTOR has no disputes. Persuant to Public Contracts Code Section 7200, the CONTRACTOR does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the CONTRACTOR by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contract amount which the CONTRACTOR has not disputed above. Dated: CONTRACTOR Signa~.J~RL F. BAUER Executive Vice Pre~ide~ Print Name and Title TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~ DIRECTOR OF FINANCE_.~;~_ GENERAL MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT General Manager/Board of Directors Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services March 27, 2001 Award of Construction Contract for the Rancho California Sports Park Culvert Modification Project - Project No. PW00-23CSD PREPARED BY: /NzjWilliam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Bruce Levy, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Award a contract for the Rancho California Sports Park Culvert Modification Project - Project No. PW00-23CSD to KEC Engineering for $59,750.00 and authorize the President to execute the contract. Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $5,975.00, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. Approve an appropriation of $25,000.00 from Development Impact Fees - Park and Recreation for the Rancho California Sports Park Culvert Modification Project. BACKGROUND: On February 13, 2001 the Board of Directors approved the plans and specifications, and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids. The Community Services Department is responsible for the maintenance of the slopes and channel bed that transverses the back of the Rancho California Sports Park. An existing box culvert brings water from the east under Margarita Road into the creek in the park. A slope area descends from the street to the culvert. The design of the existing culvert is such that the slope erodes and sloughs around the culvert, washing into the creek and creating a potentially unsafe condition. This project will provide for the addition of wing walls to the existing box culvert, reconstruction to the existing slope adjacent to the box culved and re-vegetation of the slope. The Engineer's estimate for this project is $48,450.00. R:~AGDRPT~2001 \0327\PW00-23CSDawd.doc Eight (8) bids were received and publicly opened on March 6, 2001 and results were as follows: 1. P.U.Q. Co?.ctruct!c.q, !nc. · .............. $ ....... 2. KEC Engineering ........................................................................................... $59,750.00 3. Anthony Marmolejo Construction Company, Inc ........................................... $64,959.00 4. K.A.S. Equipment & Rental, Inc .................................................................... $~6=~5,2_,4~7~.0~0 5. McLaughlin Engineering & Mining, Inc .......................................................... 6. Miramir Construction, ~nc .............................................................................. $72,000.00 7. Trautwein Construction, Inc ......................................................................... 28~5~'2~5.0~'.00% 8. Hubbs & Ferrante ......................................................................................... The bid proposal submitted by P.D.Q. Construction, ~nc. in the amount of $58,650.00 was determined to be non-responsive due to incompleteness. The bid proposal was disqualified. Staff has reviewed the bid proposals and found KEC Engineering of Corona, California to be the lowest responsible bidder for this project. Staff has contacted references and determined that KEC Engineering has satisfactorily performed similar type of work in the past. The specifications allow Forty-five (45) working days for completion of this project. Work is expected to begin in mid April 2001 and be completed by the June 2001. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: The Rancho California Sports Park Culvert Modification Project is funded with Development Impact Fees - Parks and Recreation and is included in the Capital improvement Program. Adequate Development Impact Fees - Parks and Recreation are available for the requested appropriation amount of $25,000 for the construction of this project. The total construction cost is $65,725.00, which includes the contract amount of $59,750.00 plus 10% contingency amount of $5,975.00. ATTACHMENT: 1. Project Location 2. Project Description 3. Contract 2 R:~AG D RPT~200 l\0327\PW00-23CSDawd,doc TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR PROJECTNO. PWOO-23CSD RANCHO CALIFORN~ SPORTS PARK CULVERTMODIFICA~ON THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 27TM day of March, 2001, by and between the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT", and KEC Engineering, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That DISTRICT and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: 1.a. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW00-23CSD, RANCHO CALIFORNIA SPORTS PARK CULVERT MODIFICATION, insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW00-23CSD, RANCHO CALIFORNIA SPORTS PARK CULVERT MODIFICATION. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building New, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW00-23CSD, RANCHO CALIFORNIA SPORTS PARK CULVERT MODIFICATION. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in lieu of, such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise CONTRACT CA-1 R:\cip\projects~pwg0\PW00-23\CONTRACT specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: PROJECT NO. PW00-23CSD, RANCHO CALIFORNIA SPORTS PARK CULVERT MODIFICATION All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by DISTRICT. DISTRICT APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to the approval of DISTRICT or its authorized representatives. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHDULE. The DISTRICT agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of: FIFTY NINE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS and NO CENTS ($59,750.00), the total amount of the base bid. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed Forty-Five (45) working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by DISTRICT. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by DISTRICT. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. PAYMENTS LUMP SUM BID SCEHDULE: Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests. UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE: Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the DISTRICT, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work CONTRACT CA-2 R:~cip\projects\pwO0tPW00-23\OONTRACT completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the DISTRICT on forms provided by the DISTRICT. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the General Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30) days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code, a reduction in the retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project is more than 50% complete. The Council hereby delegates its authority to reduce the retention to the Engineer. WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the DISTRICT shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule: CONTRACT AMOUNT $25,000- $75,000 RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE 180 days 3% $75,00- $500,000 180 days $2,250 + 2% of amount in excess of $75,000 Over $500,000 One Year $10,750 + 1% of amount in excess of $500,000 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to DISTRICT the sum of One Thousand dollars ($1000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by DISTRICT. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify DISTRICT of any such delay. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to DISTRICT, in writing, all claims for CONTRACT CA-3 R:~cip\projectCpwO0~PW00-23~CONTRACT 10. 11. 12. 13. compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the DISTRICT related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the DISTRICT, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend DISTRICT, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the DISTRICT. CONTRACTOR shall hold the DISTRICT, its officers, agents and employees free and harmless from any liability whatsoever , including wrongful death, based or asserted upon any act or omission of principal, its officers, agents, employees or Subcontractors relating to or in any way connected with or arising from the accomplishment of the work, whether or not such acts or omissions where in furtherance of the work required by the Contract Documents and agrees to defend at his expense, including attorney fees, DISTRICT, its officers, agents, employees and Independent Architect in any legal action base on any such alleged acts or omissions. The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the DISTRICT for any and all costs incurred by the DISTRICT as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The DISTRICT shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the DISTRICT. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to DISTRICT's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. CONTRACT CA~i R:~cip\projects~pw00\PW00-23~CONTRACT 14. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been employed by the DISTRICT within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. 15. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the General Manager, its affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 16. NOTICE TO DISTRICT OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to DISTRICT. 17. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the DISTRICT. 18. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by DISTRICT and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. 19. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, nafional origin, color, sex age, or handicap. 20. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation. 21. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or of a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. Furthermore, the contractor/consultant covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, office or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether CONTRACT CA-5 R:~cip\projects\pw00\PW00o23\CONTRACT 22. 23. contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting pady other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest comes to the knowJedge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all such information will be make, in writing, to the other pady or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the state of California. ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101- 336, as amended. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: William G. Hughes, Dir of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 OR William G. Hughes, Dir of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 CONTRACT CA-6 R:~ciCprojects~pw00~PW00-23~CONTRACT TCSD DEPARTMENTAL REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY D'RECTOR OF F'NAN~& CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Herman D. Parker, Director of Community March 27, 2001 Departmental Report Service~ PREPARED BY: Gail L. Zigler, Administrative Secretary On December 1, 1999, staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for a Citywide Multi-Trail System. Interviews were held on February 14, 2000 and the committee selected KTU& Associates as the top ranked firm. The Board of Directors awarded a contract to KTU&A on March 28, 2000. A trails questionnaire was mailed out to the residents in mid-September with approximately 450 responses returned. A sub-committee meeting was held February 8, 2001 to review potential areas identified for trails. Staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the design of an aquatic facility to be constructed at Chaparral High School. The Board of Directors approved a Scope of Services Agreement on December 7, 1999, with the number one ranked firm, RJM Design Group. The architect and project design committee has completed the schematic design of the project. The Board of Directors approved the Master Plan on June 27, 2000, and awarded a contract to RJM Design Group on July 11, 2000, for the Phase II of the Design Contract. The construction documents have been submitted to DSA. The plans are in second plan check with staff. Staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the design of a sports complex to be constructed in the City. Statements of Qualifications were received on February 16, 2000, and interviews were held of the four top ranked firms on March 28, 2000. A design contract was awarded to RJM Design Group at the May 23, 2000, Board of Directors meeting. The first sub- committee was held on November 7, 2000. With the adoption of the Wolf Creek Specific Plan at the January 23, 2001 City Council meeting, it has been determined the 40 acre sports park will be located in the Wolf Creek development. The architect is currently reviewing the sports league questionnaires submitted by the local sports leagues and reviewing the plans and specifications for the proposed site. A community workshop is scheduled for Saturday, April 7, 2001, R:~ZIGLERG\XDEPTRPT~0301 ,doc March 21, 2001 The Master Plan for the Temecula Public Library was adopted at the September 26, 2000 City Council Meeting. Staff has negotiated a contract with LPA for the final construction documents and specifications for the Temecula Public Library. LPA is currently working on construction documents for submittal for first plan check. On June 15, 2000, staff released an RFQ requesting a Statement of Qualifications to prepare a feasibility study for the development of a Water Park. A contract was awarded to the Natelson Company at the September 27, 2000 City Council Meeting, for the preparation of the Water Park Feasibility Study. A community workshop was held and the consultant completed the intercept surveys. The consultant has compiled the information received from the community workshop and intercept surveys and a committee meeting was held on March 7, 2001 to review the draft feasibility study. Staff released an RFQ for the children's museum interior space planning, exhibit design, fabrication, construction and installation. Interviews were held of the four top ranked firms on October 17, 2000. Staff began negotiations with the top ranked firm, Sparks Exhibits and Environments. The Agreement and Scope of Services was approved by the City Council on December 12, 2000. A committee meeting was held on Monday, March 19, 2001. The committee discussed naming the facility, space planning, and exhibit design and museum concepts. The Development Services Division continues to participate in the development review for projects within the City including Wolf Creek and Harveston, as well as overseeing the development of parks and recreation facilities. The Maintenance Division continues to oversee the maintenance of parks and recreation facilities, as well as all other City owned public buildings and facilities. In addition, the Maintenance Division assists in all aspects of Citywide special events. The Recreation Division is currently in the planning stages for several citywide special events including the Spring Egg Hunt, the July 1, 2001 Vail Ranch Annexation Celebration, 4th of July Parade and Fireworks Program, and the Summer Concert Series. The Recreation Division continues to program classes, activities and excursions at all City recreation facilities. R:~ZIGLERG~XDEPTRPT~0301 .doc March 21, 2001 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 APPROVAL ,~/?~,~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE~. CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Chairman and Members of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency Executive Director ~' Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manage~/~ March 27, 2001 Lease of Agency Property - 27500 Jefferson Avenue RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency approve a two year lease agreement with the Donna Reeves Trust UTD 7-25-90 for Agency property located at 27500 Jefferson Avenue. BACKGROUND: The Temecula Redevelopment Agency originally entered into a lease with the Norm Reeves Group (Donna L. Reeves Trust UTD 7-25-90) for Agency property at 27500 Jefferson Avenue in January of 1994. This agreement was periodically amended, and expired on January 25, 2001. The final lease rate from Reeves was $10,000 per month. The Agency subsequently approved a one month lease with Richardson's RV which provided for a lease rate of $14,000 per month. The Agency has previously authorized negotiations with the Norm Reeves Group for lease/purchase of this property. The attached agreement provides for: · Monthly lease rate of $15,000 per month · Two year term, beginning on April 1, 2001 · Purchase option in the amount of $2 million or fair market value as determined by the City's independent appraisal, whichever is greater Dick Kennedy, representative of the Norm Reeves Group, has agreed with these terms. Agency staff has received information from Al Florian, an independent appraiser that confirms that the proposed lease rate of $15,000 per month is at the fair market rate for this property. Staff recommends approval of the attached lease agreement. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this agreement will result in revenues of $15,000 per month to the Agency. ATTACHMENT: Proposed Lease Agreement R:IOGRADYJI27500 JEFFERSONtAGENDA REPORT- LEASE AGREEMENT W/TH REEVES, 03-27-01.DOC 1 3/20/01 Lease Agreement is being prepared by the City Attorney's Office R:IOGRADYJ[27500 JEFFERSON[AGENDA REPORT - LEASE AGREEMENT WITH REEVES, 03-27-01.D0C 2 3/16/01 ~ AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATION STANDARD INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL SINGLE-TENANT LEASE -- NET (DO NOT USE THIS FORM FOR MULTI-TENANT BUILDINGS) t. Basic Provisions ("Basic Provisions"). 1.t Parties: This Lease ("Lease"), dated for reference purposes only,March by andbehveenRedevelopment A~ency of the City of Temecula ,2001, is made ("Lessor") andDonna L. Reeves, as Trustee of the Donna L. Reeves Trust dated July 25! 1990 1.3 Term: 2 yeats and 0 _("CommencementData")ande~ldingH&rch 31~ 2003 3) 1.4 Exr~y Possession: n/a (See also Paragraphs 3.2 a~d 3.3) 1.5 Base Rent: $15,000 per month ("Base Rent"), payable on the E×ecut io~ each month commencing On Commencement Date [] If this box is checked, there are provisions tn this Lease for the Base Rent to be adjusted. 1.6 Base Rent Paid Upon Execution: $15 ~ 000 as Base Rent for the per~od ("Premises"). (See also Paragraph 2) months("OHginal'i'eml")commencingApr±l 1, 2001 ("Expiration Dat~"}. (See also Paragraph ("Early Possession Date**). day of · (See also Paragraph 4) 1,7 Security Deposit: $15, 0 O0 1.8 Agreed Use: Vehicle Sales and Service ("Security Deposit"). (See also Paragraph 5) (See also Paragraph 6) 1.9 Insuring Party: Lessor is the "tnsuHng Party" unless otbe~wme stated herein· (See also Paragraph 8) l.t0 Real Estate Brokers: (See also Paragraph 15} (a) Representation: The following real estate brokers (collectively, the "Brokers") and brokerage relationships exist in this transaction (check applicable boxes): [] bione represents Lessee exclusively ("Lessee's Broker.*); or [] None represents both Lessor and Lessee ("Dual Agency"). (b) Payment to Brokers: Upon execution and delivery of this Lease by both Parliss, Lessor shall pay to the Broker the fee agreed to in their separate written agreement (or if there is no such agreement, the sum of n/a % of the total Base'Rent for the brokerage services rendered by said 1.11 Guarantor. The obligations of the Lessee under this Lease are to be guaranteed by ("Guarantor"). (Bee also Paragraph 37) 1.12 Addenda and Exhibits. Attached hereto is an Addendum or Addenda consisting of Paragraphs __ through and Exhibits , all of which constitute a pa~t of th[s Lease. 2. Premises. 2.1 Letting. Lessor hereby leases to Lessee, and Lessee hereby leases from Lessor, the Premises, for the term, at the rental, and upon all of the terms, covenants and conditions set forth in this Lease. Unless othenvise provided herein, any stalement of size set forth in this Lease, or that may have been used in calculaling rental, is an approximation which the Parties agree is reasonable and Ihe rental based thereon is not subject to revision whether or not the actual size is more or [ess. Page 1 of 11 initials __ Expenditure is required during the last two (2) years of this Lease and the cost thereof exceeds six (6) months' Sase Rent, Lessee may instead terminate this Lease unless Lessor notifies Lessee, in writing, within ten (10) days a~er receipt of Lessee's termination notice that Lessor has eleCted to pay the difference between the actual cost thereof and the amount equal to six (6) months' Sase Rent. If Lessee elects termination, Lessee shait immediately cease the use of the Premises which requires such Capital Expenditure and deliver to Lessor written notice specifying a termination date at least ninety (90) days thereafter. Such termination date shall, however, in no event be earlier than the last day that Lessee could idgally utilize the Premises wifilout commenidng such Capital Expenditure. (b} If such Capital Expenditure is not the result of the specific and uffique use of the Premises by Lessee (such as, govemmentaity mandated seismic modiitcafions), then Lessor and Lessee shall allocate the obligation to pay for such costs pursuant to the provisions of Paragraph 7~1(c); provided, however, that if such Capital Expendfiure is required during the last two years of this Lease or if Lessor reasonably determines that it is not economically feasible to pay its share thereof, Lessor sha~l have the option to terminate this Lease upon ninety (90) days prior written notice te Lessee unless Lessee nctiites Lessor, in writing, within ten (10) days afier receipt of Lessor~ termination notice that Lessee will pay for such Capital Expenditure. If Lessor does not elect to terminate, and teiiz to tender its share of any such Capitel Expenditure, Lessee may advance such funds and deduct same, with Interest, from Rent until Lessor's share of such costs have been fugy paid. If Lessee is unable ~o finance Lesso(s share, or if the balance of the Rent due and payable for the remainder of this Lease is not sufficient to fugy reimburse Lessee on an offset basis, Lessee shall have the right to terminate this Lease upon thhty (30) days written nedce to Lessor. (c) Notwithstanding the above, the provisions concerning Capital Expenditures are intended to apply only to non-voluntary, unexpected, and new Applicable Requirements If the Capital Expenditures are instead triggered by Lessee as a resuft of an actual or proposed change in use, change in i~rtensity of use, or modification to the Premises then, and in [hat event, Lessee shall be fully responsibte for the cost thereof, and Lessee shall not have any right to terminate this Lease. 2.4 Acknowledgements. Lessee acknowledges that: (al it has been advised by Lessor and/or Brokers to satisfy itself with respect to the condition of the Premises (including but not limited 1o the electhcal, HVAC and fire sprinitter systems, security, environmental aspects, and compliance with Applicable Requirements), and their suitability for Lessee's intended use; (b) Lessee fias made such investigation as it deems necessary with reference to such matters and assumes ail responsibility therefor as the same relate to its occupancy Of the Premises; and (c) neither Lessor, Lessor's agents, nor any Broker has made any oral or wdtten ~epresentations or warranties with respect to said matters other than as set forth in this Lease. in addition, Lessor acknowiddges that: (al Stoker has made no representations, promises or watranbes concerning Lessee's ability to honor the Lease or suitability to occupy the Premises; and (b) it is Lessor's sole responsibility to investigate the financiai capability and/or suitability of all proposed tenants. 2.5 Lessee as Prior Owner/Occupant- The warranties made by Lessor in Paragraph 2 shall be of no force or effect ~f immediately prior to the Start Date Lessee was the owner or occupant of the Premises. In such event, Lessee shall be responsibte for any necessar/corrective work, 3. Term. 3.1 Term. The Commencement Date, Expiration Date and Original Term of this Lease are as specified in Paragraph 1,3, 3~2 EaBy Possession. If Lessee totally or partially occupies the Premises prior to the Commencement Date, the obligation to pay Base Rent shait be abated for the pedod of such early possession. All other terms of this Lease (inCluding, but not itmited to, the obligations to pay Real Properly Taxes and insurance premiums and {o maintain the Premises) sfiall, ho'.~ver, be in effect during such period. Any such eady possession shall not affect the Expiratidn Date. 3.3 Delay in Possession. Lessor agrees to use its best commercially reasonable efforts to deitver possession of the Premises te Lessee by the Commencement Date. If, despite said efforts, Lessor is uneqJe to deliver possession as agreed, Lessor shall not be subiect to any liability therefor, nor shall such failure affect the validity of this Lease. Lessee shall not, however, be obligated to pay Rent or perform its other obligations until it receives possession of the Premises. If possession is not delivered within sixty (60) days after the Commencement Date, Lessee may, at its option, by notice in wbting within ten (10) days after the end of such sixty (00) day period, cancel this Lease, in which event the Patties shall be discharged from all obligatidns hereunder. If such wdtten notice is not received by Lessor within said ten (10) day period, Lessee's right to canCel shall terminate. Except as otherwise provided, if possession is not tendered to Lessee by the Start Date and Lessee does not terminate this Lease, as aforesaid, any period of rent abatement that Lessee would otherwise have enjoyed shall run from the dtee of delivery of possession and continue for a period equal to what Lessee would olherwise have enjoyed under the terms hereof, but minus any days of delay caused by the acts or omissions of Lessee. ff possession of the Premises is not delivered within four (4) months after the Commencement Date, this Lease shall terminate unless other agreements are reached between Lessor and Lessee, tn writing. 3.4 Lessee Compliance. Lessor shait not be required to tender possession of the Premises to Lessee until Lessee complies wiffi its obligation to provide evidence of insurance (Paragraph 8.5). Pending deitvery of such evidence, Lessee shall be required to perform all of its obligations under this Lease ffom and after the Start Date, including the payment of Rent. notwithstanding Lessor's etecben to withhold possessidn pending receipt of such evidence of insurance. Further, if Lessee is required to perform any other conditions prior to or concurrent with the Start Date, the Start Date shall occur but Lessor may elect to withhold possession until such conditions are satisfied, 4. Rent. 4.1. Rent Defined. All monetary obligations of Lessee to Lessor under the terms of this Lease (except for the Security Deposit) are deemed to be rent ("Rent"). 4.2 Payment. Lessee shall cause payment of Rent to be received by Lessor in lawful money of the United States, without offset or deduction (except as specificaity permitted in this Lease), on or before [he day on which it is due. Rent for any period during the term hereof which is for tess than one (1) full calendar month shall be prorated based upon the actual number of days of said month. Payment of Rent shall be made to Lessor at its address stated herthn or to such other persons or place as Lessor may from time to time designate in wddng. Acceptance of a payment which is idss than the amount then dt~e shall not be a waiver of Lessor's rights to the belance of such Rent, regardless of Lessor's endorsement of any check so stating. 5. Security Deposit. Lessee shait deposit with Lessor upon execution hereof the Security Deposit as security for Lessee's faithful performance of its obligations under this Lease. If Lessee fails to pay Rent, or otherwise Defaults under this Lease, Lessor may use, apply or retain all or any portion of said Security Deposit for the payment of any amount due Lessor or to reimburse or compensate Lessor for any liability, expense, loss or damage which Lessor may suffer or incur by reason thereofi If Lessor uses or appites all or any portion of said Security Deposit. Lessee shall within ten (10) days after written request therefor deposit monies with Lessor sufficient to restore said Security Deposit to the full amount required by this Lease If the Base Rent increases during the term of this Lease, Lessee shall upon written request from Lessor, deposit edditiona~ monies with Lessor so that the thta~ amount of the Security Deposit shall at ail times bear the same proportion to the increased Sase Rent as the initial Secuhty Deposit bore to the initial Base Rent. Should the Agreed Use be amended to accommodate a mwiebef change in the business of Lessee or to accommcdate a subJessee Or assignee, Lessor shait have the right to increase the Security Deposit to the extent necessary, in Lessor's reasonable judgment, to account for any increased wear and tear that the Premises may suffer as a result thereof. If a change in control of Lessee occurs duhng this Lease and following such change the financial condition of Lessee is, in Lessor*s reasonable judgment, significantly reduced. Lessee shait deposit such aeditional monies with Lessor as shall be sufficient to cause the Secudty Deposit to be at a commercially reasonable level based On said change in financial condition. Lessor shall not be required to keep the Security Deposit separate from its general accounts. Within fourteen (14) days after the expiration or termination of this Lease. if Lessor elects [o apply the Security Deposit only to unpaid Rent, and otherwise within thirty (30) days after the Premises have been vacated pursuant to Paragraph 7.4(c) below, Lessor shall return that portion of the Security Deposit not used or applied by Lessor. NO part of the Security Deposit shaII be considered to be held in trust, to bear interest or to be prepayment for any monies to be pard by Lessee under this Lease. Page 2 of 11 Initials govemmentsl authority, or (iii) a basis for potential liability of Lessor to any governmental agency or third party under any applicable statute or common law theory. Hazardous Substances shalt include, but not be limited to, hydrocarbons, petroleum, gasoline, and/or crude clJ or any produc~s, by-products or fractions thereof. Lessee shall not engage in any activity in or on the Premises which constitutes a Reportable Use of Hazardous Substances without the express prior written consent of Lessor and timely complldnce (al Lessee*s expense) with all Applicable Requirements. "Reportable Use" shall mean (il the installation or use of any above or below ground storage tank, (ii) the generation, possession, storage, use, transportafton, or disposal of a Hazardous Substance that requires a parred hem, or with respect to which a report, notice, registration or business pldn is required to be filed with, any governmental authority, and/or (iii} the presence at the Premises of a Hazardous Substance with respect to which any Appltcable Requirements requires that a notice be given to persons entering or occupying the Premises or neighboring properties, Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lessee may use any ordinary and customary materials reasonably required to be used in the no,mai course of the Agreed Use, so long as such use is in compliance with all Applicable Requirements, is not a Reportable Use, and does not expose the Premises or neighboring property to any meaningful risk of contamination or damage or expose Lessor to any liability therefor, tn addition, Lessor may COndition tis consent to any Reportable Use upon receiving such addtildnal assurances as Lessor reasonably deems necessary to protect itseE, the public, the Premises aod/or the environment against damage, contamination, injury and/or liability, inofoding, but no/limited ts, the installation (and removal on or before Lease expiration or termination) ut protective modifications (such as concrete encasements) and/or increasing the Security Deposit. (b) Duty to Inform Lessor. If Lessee knows, or has reasonable cause to believe, that a Hazardous Substance has come to be located in, on, under or about the Premises, other than as previously consented to by Lessor, Lessee shall immediately give written notice of such fact to Lessor, and provide Lessor with a copy of any report, notice, c/dim or other documentation which ti has concerning the presence of such Hazardous Substance, (c) Lessee Remethation. Lessee shall not cause or permit any Hazardous Substance to be spilled or released in, on, under, or about the Premises (including through the plumbing or sanitary sewer system) and shall promptly, at Lessee's expense, take all investigator/and/or remedial action reasonchiy recommended, whether or not formally ordered or required, for the cleanup of any contamination of, and for the maintenance, security and/or monitoring of the Premises or neighboring properties, that was caused Or matsrially contributed to by Lessee, or pertaining to or involving any Hazardous Substance brought onto the Premises during the to~m of this Lease, by or for Lessee, or any third pady. (d} Lessee Indemnification. Lessee shalt indemnify, defend and hold Lessor, tis agents, empleyees, lenders and ground lessor, if any, harmless from and against any and all loss of rents and/or damages, liabltities, judgments, claims, expenses, penalties, and attorneys' and consutiants' fees adidng out of or involving any Hazardous Substance brought onto the Premises by or for Lessee, or any third patty (provided, however, that Lessee shall have no [ldbltity under this Lease with respect to underground migration of any Hazardous Substance under the Premises from adjacent proper[ids). Lessee's obligations shall include, but not be limited to, the effects of any con~aminatidn or injury to person, prope~y or the environment c~eatod or suh'ered by Lessee, and the cost of investigation, removal, remedldtion, restoration and/or adatement, and shall survive the expiration or termination of this Lease. No terrnlnaflon, cancellation or release agreement entered into by Lessor and Lessee shall release Lessee from its obllgaUons under this Lease ~ith respect to Hazardous Substances, unless specifically so agreed by Lessor in wHUng at the time of such agreement. (el Lessor Indemnification. Lessor and tis successors and assigns shall indemnify, defend, reimburse and hold Lessee, its employees and lenders, harmless from and against any and all environmental damages, including the cost of remedldtion, which existed as a result of Hazardous Substances on the Premises prior to the Start Date or which are caused by the gross negligence or wildul misconduct of Lessor, ~[s agents or employees. Lessor's obligations, as and when required by the Applicable Requirements, shall include, but not be limited to, the cost of investigation, removal, remediation, restoration and/or abatement, and shall survive the expiration or termination of this Lease. (f) thvesUgatJon$ and Remethatthns. Lessor shall retain the responsibility and pay for any investigations or remediation measures required by governmental entities having jurisdiction with respect to the existence of Hazardous Substances on the Premises pdor to the Start Date, unless such remediedon measure is required as a result of Lessee's use (including "Alterations", as defined in Paragraph ?.3(al below) of the Premises, in which event Lessee shall be responsible for such payment. Lessee shall cooperate folly in any such activides at the request Of Lessor, including allowing Lessor and Lessotis agents to hove reasonable access to the Premises at reasonable times in order to cam/Out Lessor's investigath, e and remedial responsibltities. (gl Lessor Termination Option. If a Hazardous Substance Condition occurs during the term of this Lease, unless Lessee is legally responsible therefor (in which case Lessee shalt make the investigation and remediution thereof required by the Applicable Requirements and this Lease shalt continue in full force and effect, but subject to Lessor's rights under Paragraph 6.2(d) and Paragraph 13), Lessor may, at Lessotts option, either (il invesltgate and remediate SUCH Hazardous Substance Condition, if required, as soon as reasonably possible at Lessor's expense, in which event this Lease shalt continue in full force and effect, or (ii) if the estimated cost to remediate such Condition exceeds twelve (12) times the then monthly Base Rent or $100,O00, whichever is greater, give wriden notice to Lessee, within thirty (30) days after receipt by Lessor of knowledge of the occurrence of such Hazardous Substance Condition, of Lessot's desire to terminate this Lease as of the date sixty (60) days following the date of such notice. In the event Lessor elects to give a termination notice, Lessee may, within ten (10) days thereafter, give wriffen notice to Lessor of Lessee's commitment to pay the amount by which the cost of the remediaiton of such Hazardous Substance Condition exceeds an amount equal to twelve (12) times the then monthly Base Rent or $100,000, whichever is greater. Lessee shall provide Lessor with said funds or satisfactory assurance thereof WHhhl thuty (30) days fo/towing such commitment. In such event, this Lease shall continue in foil force and effect, and Lessor shalt proceed to make such remethation as soon as reasonably possible after the required funds are ava/table. If Lessee does not give such notice and provide the required funds or assurance thereof within the time provided, this Lease shall te~minath as of the date specified in Lessofis notice of termination. 6.$ Lassoers Compliance with Applicable Requirements. Except as othervrise provided in this Lease, Lessee spell, at Lessee's sole expense, folly, diligently and in a timely manner, materially comply with all Appltcabts Requirements, the requirements of any applicable fire insurance unde~titor or rating bureau, and the recommendations of Lessor's engir~eers and/or consultants which relate in any manner to the Premises, without regard to whether said requirements are now in effect or become effective after the Start Date. Lessee shall, within ten (10) days after receipt of Lessor's whtton request, provide Lessor with copies of alt permits and other documents, and other information evidencing Lessee's compliance with any Applicable Requirements specified by Lessor, and shall immediately upon receipt, notify Lessor in writing (with copies of any documents involved) of any threatened or actual claim, notice, citation, waming, complaict or report pertaining to or involving the failure of Lessee or the Premises th comply with any Applicable Requirements. 6.4 Inspection; Compliance. Lessor and Lessor's "Lender" (as defined in Paragraph 30 below) and consultants shall have the right to enter into Premises at any time, in the case of an emergency, and uther~se at reasonable times, for the purpose of inspecting the condition of the Premises and for verifying compliance by Lessee with this Lease. The cost of any such inspections shall be paid by Lessor. unless a violation of Applica tile Requirements, or a contamination is found to exist or be imminent, or the inspection is requested or ordered by a governmental authority. In such case, Lessee shall upon request reimburse Lessor for th~ cost of such inspections, so long as such inspection is reasonably related to the violdtlen or contamination. 7. Maintenance; Repairs, Utility Installations; Trade Fixtures and Alterations. 7.1 Lessee's Obligations. (a) In General. Subject to the provisions of Paragraph 2.2 (Condition), 2,3 (Compliance), 6.3 (Lessee's Compliance with Applicable Requirements), 7.2 (Lessor's Obligations), 9 (Damage or Destruction), and 14 (Condemnation), Lessee shall, at Lessee's sole expense, keep the Premises, Utility Inst al]arlene, end Alterations in good order, condition and repair (whether or not the portion of the Premises requiring repairs, Or the means of repaidng the same, are reasonably or readily accessible to Lessee, and whether or not the need for such repairs occurs as a result of Lessee's use, any prior use, the elements or the age of such portion of the Premises), including, but not limited to, all equipment or facititiee, such as plumping, heating, ventilating, air.conditioning, electhcal, lighting facilities, boilers, pressure vessels, fire protection system, I'rdures, walls (interior and exterior), foundations, ceilings, floors, windows, doors, plate glass, skylights, landscaping, driveways, parking lots, fences, retaining walls, signs, sidewalks and parkways located in, on, or adjacent to the Premises. Lessee, in keeping the Premises in good order, condition and repair, shall exercise and perform good maintenance practices, specifically including the prccurement and maintenance of the service contracts required by Paragraph 7.1(b) below. Lessee*s obligations shalt include restorations, replacements or renewids when necessary to keep the Premises and all improvements thereon Or a part thereof in good order, condition and state of repair. Lessee shall, during the term of this Lease, keep the exterior appearance of the Building in a test-c/dss condition consistent with the extsrior appearance of other similar facilities of comparable age and size in the vididity, inc/oding, when necessary, the exterior repainting of the Bciiding. (b) Service Contracts. Lessee shall, at Lessee's sole expense, procure and maintain contracts, with copies to Lessor, in customary form and substance for, and with contractors specJaJizing and experienced in the maintenance of the following equipment and improvements, if any, if and when installed on the Premises: (il HVAC equipment, (ii) boiler, and pressure vessels, (iii) fire extidguishing systems, including fire aldn'n and/or smoke detection, (iv) landscaping and irrigation systems, (v) roof covering and drains, (vi) driveways and parking lots, (vii) clarifiers (viii) basic utility feed to the pedmuter of the Building, and (ix) any other equipment, if reasonably required by Lessor. Page 3 of ti Initials (c) ReptacemenL Subject to LesSee's indemnification of Lessor as set forth in Paragraph 8.7 below, and wiihout relieving Lessee of lisbltity resulting from Lessee's failure to exercise and perform good maintenance practices, if the Basic Elements described in Paragraph 7.1 (b) cannot be repaired other than a~ a cost which is in excess of 50% Of {he cost of replacing such Basic Elements, then such Basic Elements shall be replaced by Lessor, and the cost thereof shall be firoratad between the Parties and Lessee shall only be obligated to pay, each month dudng the remainder of the term of this Lease, on the date on which Base Rent is due, an amount equal lo the product of multiplyiog the cosl of such replacement by a fraction, the numerator of which is one, and the denominator of which is the number of months of the useful life of such reqiacement as such usefel lee is spec/bed pursuant to Federal income tax regutations or guidelines for deprectation thereof (including interest on the unamodlzed balance as is then commercially reasonabis in the judgment of Lessor's accountants), with Lessee reserving the dght to prepay its obligation at any rime. 7.2 Lessor's Obligations. Subject to the provisions of Paragraphs 2.2 (Condition), 2.3 (Compliance). 9 (Damage or Destruction) aod 14 (Condemnation), it is intended by the Parties hereto that Lessor have no obligation, in any manner whatsoever, th repair and maintain the Premises, or the equipment therein, all of which obligations are intended to be that of the Lessee. It is the intention of the Parties that the terms of this Lease govern th~ respective obligabens of the Parties as ~o maintenance and repair of the Premises, and they expressly waive the benefit of any statute now or hereafter in effect to the extent it is inconsistent with the terms of this Lease. 7.3 utlgty Installations; Trade Fixtures; Alterations. (a) Definitions; Consent Required. The term "Utility Installations" refers th all freer and window coverings, air lines, power panels, electhcal disthburion, security and fire protaction systems, communication systems, lighting fixtures, HVAC equipment, plumbing, and fencing is or on the Premises. The term '~Trabe Fixtures" shall mean Lessee's machinery and equipment that can be removed without doing matedal damage to the Premises. The term "AItaraflor~s" shall mean any rnodificaiton of the improvements, other than Utility thstallarions or Trade Fixtures, whetbe~ by addition or deletion. "Lessee Owned Alterations and/or Uflrity Installations" are defined as Alterations and/or Utility testa/tat/ohs made by Lessee that are not yel owned by Lessor pursuant to Paragraph 7.4(a). Lessee shall not make any Aberations or UtJlib/ Installations to the Premises without Lesser's pbor vmlfen consent. Lessee may, however, make non-structural Utility Installations to the interior of the Premises (excludisg the roof) wilhout such consent but upon notice to Lessor, as long as they are not visible from the Outside. do not involve punctudng, relocating or removing the P0of or any exisring walls, and the cumulative cost thereof dudng this Lease as extended d~s not exceed $ fi0,000 in the aggregate or $10,000 in any one year. (b) Consent. Any Alterations or Utility Instaltarions that Lessee shall desire to make and which require the consent of the Lessor shalt be presented to Lessor in whften form with detailed plans, Consent shall be deemed conditioned upon Lessee's; (i) acquiring all applicable governmental permits, (ii) furnishing Lessor w~th copies of both the permits and the plans and specifications prior to commencement of the work, and (iii) compliance with att conditions of said permits and other Applicable Requirements in a prompt and expeditious manner. Any Alterations or Uri[ity Installations shall be pen'on'ned in a workmanlike manner with good and sufficient matarials. Lessee shall promptly upon compislisn furnish Lessor with as-built glans and specifications. For wo~k which costs an amount equal to the greater of one month's Base Rent, or $10,000, Lessor may condition its consent upon Lessee providing a lien and comp/er/on bond in an amount equal to one and one-harf times the estimated cost of such Alteration or Utit~ty tastallarion and/or upon Lessee's posting an additional Securify Deposit with Lessor. (c) Indemnification. Lessee cheil pay, when due, air claims for labor or matedale fumlehed or alleged to have been furnished to or for Lessee at or for use on the Promises, which claims are or may be secured by any mechanic's or matadalmen's lien against the Premises or any interest thereis. Lessee shall g~ve Lessor not less than tan (10) days' notice prior to the commencement d/any work in, on or about the Premises, and Lessor shall have the right ta post notices of non-responsibility, if Lessee shall contest the validity of any such lien, claim or demand, then Lessee shall, al its sole expense defend and protect itself, Lessor and the Premises against the same and shall pay and ssgsfy any such adverse judgment that may be rendered thereon before the enforcement thereof, if Lessor shall require, Lessee shall furnish a surety bond in an amount equal to one and one-half times the amount of such contested lien, claim or demand, indemnifying Lessor against liability for the same. If Lessor elects lo participate in any such action, Lessee shelt pay (a) Ownership. Subject to 'Lesso(s righ~ th require removal or elect ownership as hereinarter provided, all Alterations and Utility of all or any sbecibed part of the Lessee Owned ;Jtararions and Utility Instal/orions. Unrsss othenvise instructed per Paragraph 7.4(b) hereof, all Lessee (b) Removal. By delivery to Lessee of wdlten notice from Lessor not earlier than ninety (90) and not later than thirty (30) days prior to provisions of Paragraph 26 below. 8. Insurance; Indemnity. liability insurance ca.ed by Lessor under Paragraph 8.g(b) in excess of $2,000,g00 per occurrence. Premiums for policy periods commencing prior to or fulto~ng receipt of an invoice. 8.2 Liability I~.surance. (a) Carried by Lessee. Lessee shall obtain and keep in force a Commercial General Liability Policy of Insurance protecting Lessee and (b) Carried by Lessor. Lessor shall maintain lisbility insurance as described in Paragraph 8.B(a), in addition to. and not in lieu of, the 6.3 property Insurance. Building. Improvements and Rental Value. payable to Lessor, any grouodisssor, and to any Lender(s) insudng loss or damage to the Premises. The amount of such insurance shall be equal to the full commercially reasonable and avaitabia insurable va;ua thefech If Lessor is the Insuring Party, however, Lessee Owned Alterations and Utility Installations, coverage amount by a factor of not/sss than the adjusted U.S. Department of Labor Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for the city nearest to Page 4 of 11 taitials __ where the Premises are located. If such insurance coverage has a deductibis clause, the deductible amount shall not exceed $1,000 per occun'ence, and Lessee shalt be liable for such deduchble amount in the event of an Insured Loss (b) Rental Value. The Insuring Party shall obtain and keep in force a policy or policies in the name of Lessor with loss payable to Lessor and any Lender, insuring the loss of the full Rent for one (1) year. Said insurance shall provide that in the event the Lease is tan~inated by reason of an insured loss. the period of indemnity for such coverage shall he extended beyond the date of the completion of repairs or replacement of the Premises, to provide for one full yea~s fuss of Rent from the date of any such loss. Said insurance shall contain an egmed valuation provision in lieu of any coinsurance ctause, and the amount of coverage shall be adjusted annually to reflect the projected Rent othenvise payable by Lessee, for the next twelve (t2} month peded. Lessee shall he liable/or any deductible amount in the event of such loss. (C) Adjacent Premises. If the Premises are part of a larger building, or of a group of buildings owned by Lessor which are adjacent to the Premises, the Lessee shell pay for any increase in the premiums for the property insurance of such building or buildings i; said increase is caused by Lesseeis acts, omissions, use or occupancy of the Premises. 8.4 Lessee's Property/Business fotan~ption Insurance. (a) Property Damage. Lessee shall obtain and maintain insurance coverage on all Of Lessee*s personal properly, Trade Fixtures, and Lessee Owned Alterations and Utility Installations. Such insurance shall be full repiscem~nt cost coverage with a deductible of not to exceed $1,000 per occurrence. The proceeds from any such insurance shall be used by Lessee for the replacement of personal property, Trade Fixtures and Lessee Owned Alterations and Utility Installedons. Lessee shell provide Lessor with vaitten evidence that such insurance is in force. (b) Business Interruption. Lessee shall obtain and maintain loss of income and extra expense insurance in amounts as will reimburSe Lessee for direct or indirect loss of earnings attributable to all padis commonly insured against by prudent lessees in the business of Lessee or attdbotable to prevention of access ta the Premises as a result of such padis. (c) No Representation of Adequate Coverage. Lessor makes no representation that the limit s or forms of co.rage of insurance specified herein are adequate to cover Lessee"s property, business operations or obligations under this Lease. 8.5 Insurance Policies. Insurance required herein shell be by companies duly licensed or admitted (o transact business in the state where the Premises are located, and maintaining dudng the policy term a "General Pchcyholders Rating" of at least B+, V, as se/forth in the most c~Jrrent issue of "Beat's Insurance Guide", or such other rating as may be required by a Leeder, Lessee shall not do or permit [o he done anything which invalidates the required insurance policies. Lessee shall, prior to the Start Date, deth. er to Lessor certified copies of policies of such insurance or certificates evidencing the existence and amounts of the required insurance. No such pcticy shall be cancelable or subject to modification except after thirty (30) days pedr wfrhen notice to Lessor Lessee shall, at least thirty (30) days pedr to the expiration of such pe[icie s, furnish Lessor with evidence of renewals Or "insurance binders" evidencing renewal thereof, or Lessor may order such insurance and charge the cost thereof to Lessee, which amount shall be payable by Lessee to Lessor upon demand. Such policies shall be for a term of at least one year, or the length of the remaining term of this Lease, whichever is less. If either Party shall fail to procure and maintain/he insurance required to be carried by it, the other Party may, but shall not be required to, proc~re and maintain the same. 8.6 Waiver of SubrogaUon. Without affecting any other rights or remedies, Lessee and Lessor each hereby release and re[ldve the other, and waive their entire dght to recover damages against/he other, for loss of or damage ta its property arising out of or incident to the padis required fo he insured against herein. The effect of such releases and waivers is no/limited by the amount of insurance carried or required, or by any deductibles applicable hereto. The Par[ids agree to have their respective property damage insurance carriers waive any dght to subregotion that such companies may have against Lessor or Lessee, as the case may be, so long as the insurance is not invalidated thereby. 8.7 indemnity. Except for Lessor's gross negligence or willfd/ misconduct, Lessee shall indemn~;y, protect, defend and hold harmless the Premises. Lessor and its agents, Lessor~s master or ground lessor, partners and Lenders, from and against any and all ctaims, fuss of rents and/or damages, liens, judgments, penalties, attorneys' and consultants' fees. expenses and/or liabilities edging out of, idvoiving, or in connection with, the use and/or occupancy of the Premises by Lessee. If any action or proceeding is brought against Lessor by raison of any of the foregoing matters, Lessee shall upon notice defend the same at Lesseeis expense by counsel reasonably satisiactory to Lessor and Lessor shall cooperate with Lessee in such defense. Lessor need not have first paid any such claim in order'fo he defended or indemnified. g.it Exemption of Lessor from Ltabitlty. Less~rch~~~n~the~iab~eforinjury~rdameget~thepers~n~rg~ods'wares'memhandise~r~ther property of Lessee, Lessee's employees, contractors, invitaes, customers, or any other person in or about the Premises, whether such damage or injury is caused by or results from fire, steam, eidotdcity, gas, water er rain, or from the breakage, leakage, obetmction or other defects of pipes, fire sprinklers, wires, appliances, plumbing, HVAC Or lighting fixtures, or from any other cause, whether the said injury or damage results from conditions arising upon the Premises or upon other portions of the Suildfug Of which the Premises are a part, or from other sources or places. Lessor shall not be liable for any damages arising from any act or neglect of any other tenant of Lessor. Notwithstanding Logger's negligence or breach of this Lease, Lesser shall under no circumstances be liable/or injur7 to Lessee's business or for any loss of income or pro/d therefrom. 9. Damage or Destruction. 9.1 Definitions. (a) 'premises Partial Damage" shall mean damage or destruction iD the improvements on the Promises, other than Lessee Owned Alterations and Ufility Installations, which can reasonably be repaired in six (6) months or less from the date of/he damage or destruction. Lessor shall notify Lessee in whting within thirly (30) days from the date of the damage or destruction as to whether or not the damage is Partial or Total (b) "Premises Total DestrucUon" shall mean damage or destruction to the Premises, other than Lessee Owned Alterations aDd Ut~7 Installations and Trade Fixtures, which cannot reasonably be repaired in six (6) months or less from the date of the damage or destruction. Less~ ked/I n~ Lessee in writing within thirty (30) days from the date of the damage or destruction as to whether or not the damage is Partial or Total. (c) "Insured Loss" shall mean damage or destruction to improvements on the Premises, other than Lessee Om~ed Att ore,cms and ~ foctedxtions and Trade Fixtures, which was caused by an even/ required to be covered by the insurance described in Paragraph 8.3(a). ~ of any deductible amounts or coverage limits involved, (d) "Replacement Cost*' shall mean the cost to repair or rebuild the improvements owned by Lessor at the ~me of the c.=cu~rence to ~ condition existing immediately prior thereto, including demolition, debris removal and upgrading required by ~e operat~ of AeOn:able Restatement. and without deduction/or depreciation. (e) "Hazardous Substance CondttJon" shall mean the occurrence or discovery of a con(hbon in ~oh,~ the passe.ce of. or a cont~mioaben by. a Hazardous Substance as defined in Paragraph 6.2(a), in. on, or under the Premises. Page $ of 11 Initials __ to give wdben notice to Lessor of Lessee*s commitment to pay for the repair of such damage without reimbursement from Lessor. Lessee shall provide Lessor with said fends or sstisfactor¥ assurance thereof withle thiriy (30)days after making such commitment. In such evect this hease shall cordthue th full force and effect, and Lessor shall proceed to make such repairs as soon as reasonably possible after the required funds are available. If Lessee does not make the required commitment, this Lease sbe[I terminate as of the date specified in tbe termination notice. fi.4 Total Destruct[on. Notw~thsteeding any other provision hereof, if a Premises Tote~ Destruction occurs, this Lease stiall terminate sixty (60} days fctlowthg such Destruction. If the damage or destruction was caused by the gross nngiigence or willful misconduct of Lessee, Lessor shall have the right to recover LeSSor's damages from LesSee, except as provided in Paragraph fi.6. 9.5 Damage Near End of Term. If at any time dudng the lest six (6) months of this Lease there is damage for which the cost to repair exceeds one (1) mofoh's Base Rent. whether or not an Insured Loss, Lessor may terminate this Lease effective sixty (60) days following the date of occurrence of such damage by Ch, log a written temlioetlen notice to Lessee within thi~y (g0) days after the date of occurrence of such damage. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Lessee at that time has an exercisable option to extend this Lease or to purchase the Premises, then Lessee may preserve this Lease by, (a) exercising such Option and (b) providing Lessor with any shodage in lesuraece proceeds (or adequate assurance thereof) needed to make the repairs on or ' before the earlier of (i) the date which is ten days after Lessee's receipt of Lessoris written notice purpothng th terminate this Lease, or (ii) the day prior to the date upon which SUch option expires, if Lessee duly exercises such option during such period and provides Lessor whh funds (or adequate assurance thereof) to cover any shortage in insurance proceeds, Lessor shall, et Lesson's commercially reasonable expense, repair such damage as soon as reasonably possible and this Lease shall continue in fuji force and effect, if Lessee fails to exercise such option and provide such funds or assurance during such period, then this Lease shall terminate on the date specified in the term[nation notice and Lessee's option shall be extinguished. 9.6 Abatement of Rent; Lesses's Remedies. (a) Abatement. In the event of Premises Padial Damage or Premises Total Destruction or a Hazardous Substance Condition for which Lessee is net responsible under this Lease, the Rent payable by Lessee for the period required for the repair, remethation or restoration of such damage shall he abated tn proportion to the degree to which Lessee's use of the Premises is impaired, but not to exceed the proceeds received from lhe Rental Value insurance. All other obiigabons of Lessee hereunder shall be performed by Lessee, and Lessor shall have fie liabidty for any such damage, destruction, remddiedon, repair or restoration except as provided herein. (b) RemedieS. ft Lessor shall be obligated to repair or restore the Premises and does not commence, lea substantial end meaningful way, such repair or restoration within ninety (90) days aEer such obligation shall accrue, Lessee may, at any time pHo~ to the commencement of such repair or restoration, give wfitten notice to Lessor and to any Lenders of which Lessee has actual notice, Of Lessee's election to terminate this Lease on a date not less than sixty (60) days fubowthg the giving of such notice. If Lessee gives such notice and such repair or restoration is not commenced within thirty (30) days thereafter, this Lease shall terminate as of the date specified in said notice. If the repair or resforafion is commenced within said thirty (30) days. this Lease shall cordioue in foil force and effect. "Commence" shall mean either the unconditional authorization of the preparation of the required plans, or the beginning of the actual work on the Premises, whichever first occurs. 9.7 Termination - Advance Payments. Upon term[nation of this Lease pursuant to Paragraph 6.2(g) or Paragraph 9. an equitable adjustment shatl be made concemleg advance Base Rent and any other advance payments made by Lessee to Lessor. Lessor shall, in addition, return to Lessee so much of Lessee's Security Deposit as has not been. or is not then required to be, used by Lessor. g.fi Waive Statutes. Lessor and Lessee agree that the ten'ns of this Lease shall govern the effect of any damage to or destruction of the Premises with respect to the termination of this Lease end hereby waive the provisions of any present or future statute to the extent incons[sferd herewith. 10. Real Property Taxes. 10.1 Definition of "Real Property Taxes." As used herein, the fo~m "Real Property Taxes" shall include any form of assessn~nt; real estate, general, special, ordinary or extraordinary, or rental levy or tax (other than inheritance, personal income or estate taxes); improvement bond; and/or license fee imposed upon or levied against any legal or equitable interest of Lesser in the Premises, Lessor's right to other income therefrom, and/or Lessofis business of leasing, by any authority having the direct or indirect power to tax and where the funds are generated wfih reference to the Building address and where the proceeds so generated are to be ape)led by the city, county or other loCal taxing authority of a jddediction within which the Premises are located. The term "Real Property Taxes" shall also include any tax, fee, levy, assessment or charge, or any increase therein, imposed by reason of events occurring during the teem of this Lease, including but net limited to, · change in the ownership of the premises. 10,2 (a) Payment of Taxes. Lessee shall pay the Real Preberty Taxes applicedle to the Premises dddng the term of this Lease. Subject to Paragraph 10.2(b}. all such payments shall be made at least ten (10) dayS pdor to any deknquency date. Lessee shall promptly furnish Lessor with satisfactory evidence that such taxes have been paid, If any such taxes shatl cover any pehod of time prior to or after the expiration or terminafion of this Lease, Lessee's share of such taxes shall be prorated to cover only that pertron of the tax bill applicable to the period that this Lease is in effect, and Lessor shall reimburse Lessee for any overpayment. If Lessee shall fail to pay any required Real Property Taxes, Lessor shall have the dght to pay the same, and Lessee shall reimburse LesSOr therefor upon demand. (b) Advance Paymeof~ In the event Lessee incurs a late charge on any Rent payment, Lessor may, at Lessot's option, estimate the cu,'rent Real Property Taxes, and require that such taxes be paid tn advance to Lessor by Lessee, either~ (i) in a lump sum amount equal to the installment due, at least tv,~nty (20} days pdor to the applicable delinquency date. or (ii) monthly le advance with the payment of the Base Rent. If Lessor elects to require payment monthly in advance, the monthly payment shall be an amount equal to the amount of the estimated installment of taxes divided by the number of months remaining before the month in which said installment becomes delinquent. When the actual amount of the applicable tax bill is known, the amount of such equal monthly advance payments shall be adjusted as required to provide the funds needed to pay the beplioable taxes. Iftbe amount coliocted by Lessor is insufficient to pay such Real Property Taxes when due, Lessee shell pay Lessor. upon demand, such additional sums as are necessary to pay such obligabens. Atl monies paid to Lessor under this Paragraph may be intermingled with other monies of Lessor and shall not pear interest. In the event of a Breach by Lessee in the performance of its obligations under this Lease, then any balance of funds paid to Lessor under the provisions of this Paragraph may, at the option of Lessor, be treated as an additional Security Deposit. t0.3 Jotht AssessmenL If the Premises are not separately assessed, Lessee's liability shall be an equitable proportion of the Real PropeCy Taxes for all of the land and improvements included whhin the tax parcel assessed, such proportion to be conclusively determined by Lessor from the respective valuations assigned in the assesseds work sheets or such other information as may be reasonably available. 10.4 personal property Taxes. Lessee shall pay, pdor to delinquency, all taxes assessed against and levied upon Lessee Owned Alterations, Util~y thsta[Ictions, Trade Fixtures, furnishings, equipment and all personal prope~y of Lessee. When possibid, Lessee shall cause such property to be assessed and billed separately from the real proberty of Lessor. If any of Lesseeis said personal property shall be assessed whh Leseor's real property, Lessee shall pay Lessor the taxes att fibutebio to Lesseeis property within ten (10) days after receipt of a written statement. 11. UtllBies. Lessee shall pay for all water, gas, heat, light, power, telephone, trash disposal and other uthrile s and services supplied to the Premises, together whh any taxes thereon. If any such sen, ices are not separately metered to Lessee, Lessee shall pay a reasonable proportion, to be determined by Lessor, of all charges jointly metered. t2. Assignment and Subletting. 12.1 Lessor'$ Consent Required. (a) Lessee shall not voluntarily or by operation of law assign, transfer, mortgage or encumber (collectively, "assign or assignment") or sublet all or any pad of Lessee's interest in this Lease or in the Premises without Lessor's prior wfiben consent. {b) A change in the control of Lessee shall constitute an assignment requiting consent. The transfer, on a cumulative basis, of Iwenty-flve percent (25%) or more of the voting control of Lessee shall constitute a change in cordml for this purpose. (c) The involvement of Lessee or its assets in any bansaction, or series of transactions (by way of merger, sale, acquisition, financing, fransfer, ioveragdd boy-out or ethane,isa), whether or not a formal assignment or hypotheCation of this Lease or Lesseeis assets occurs, which results or will result in a reduction of the Net Wodh of Lessee by an amount greater than t'~enty-flve percent (25%) of such Net Worth as it was represented at the time of the execution of this Lease o,' at the time of the most recent assignment to which Lessor has consented, or as it exists immediately prior to said transaction or transactions constituting such reduction, whichever was or is greater, shall be consiberdd an assignment of this Lease to which Lessor may withhold its consent. "Net Wogh of Lessee" shall mean the net worth of Lessee (excluding any guarantors) established under generally accepted accounting principles. (d) An assignment or subletting ',~hout consent shall, at Leesor's option, be a Default curable a~er notice per Paragraph 13.'~(c). or a noncurabio Breach without the necessity of any notice and grace period. If Lessor elects to treat such unapproved assignment o¢ subleffing as a noncurable Breach, Lessor may either: (i) terminate this Lease, or (ii) upon thirty (30) days wHben notice, increase the monthly Base Rent to one hundred ten percent initials Page 6 of tl ©t997 -American Industrial Real Estate Ass~x:taflon REVISED FORM STN-6-2/97E (110%) of the Base Rent then in effect. Further, in the event of such Breach and rental adjustment, (i) the purchase price of any option th purchase the Premises held by Lessee sha[t be subject to similar adjustment to one hundred ten percent (110%) of the price previously in effect, and (ii) all fixed and non-fixed rental adjustments scheduled dudng the remainder of the Lease term shall be increased to One Hundred Ten Percent (110%) of the scheduled adjusted rent. (e) Lessee's remedy for any breach of Paragraph 12.1 by Le~sor shall be limited to compensrdor7 damages and/or injunctive relief. 12,2 Terms and Conditions Applicable to Assignment and Subletting. (a} Regardless of Lessor's consent, any assignment or subletting shal{ not: (i) be effective ,..,ffhou~ the express written assumption by such assignee or subiessee of the obligations of Lessee under this Lease; (lO release Lessee of any obligations hereunder, or (iii) alter the primary iiabilgy of Lessee for the payment of Rent or for the pefformance of any other obligations to be pedom~ed by Lessee. (b) Lessor may accept Rent or pen'ormance of Lessee's obligations from any person other than Lessee pending approval or disapproval of an assignment+ Neitber a delay in the approval or disapproval of such assignment nor the acceptance of Rent or berformance shall constitute a waiver or estoppel ol Lessor's right to exercise its remedies for Lessee's Default et Breach. (c) Lessor's consent to any assignment or subletting shali not constitute a consent to any subsequent assignment or subletting. (d) In {be event of any Default or Breach by Lessee, Lessor may proceed dbectiy against Lessee, any Guarantors or anyone else responsible for the performance of Lessee's obligations under this Lease, incJuding any assignee or sublessee, without first exhausting Lessor's remedies against any other person or enffiy responsible therefore to Lessor, or any security held by Lessor+ · (e) Each request for consent to an assignment or subletting shall be in writing, accompanied by information relevant to Lessor's determination as to the financial and operational responsibility and appropriateness of the proposed assignee or sublessee, including but not limried to t~e intended use and/or required modification of the premises, if any, together with a fee of $1,000 or ten percent (10%) of the current monthly Base Rent applicable to the portion of the Premises which is the subject ol the proposed assignment or sublease, whichever is greater, as consgieratlen for Le~so~'s considering and processing said request· Lessee agrees to provide Lessor with such other or additional information and/or Pocumema~ion as may be reasonably requested. (f) Any assigrlee of, Or sublessee under, this Lease shall, by reason of accepting such assignment or entenng into such sublease, be deemed to have assumed and agreed to conform and comply with each and every term. covenant, condition and obligation herein to be observed Or performed by Lessee during the term of said assignment Or sublease, other than such obligations as are contrary to or inconsistent with pr0wsions Of an assignment or sublease to which Lessor has specifically consented to in writing. 1 g,3 Additional Terms and Conditions Applicable to Subletting. The following terms and conditions shall apply to any subletting by Lessee of all or any part of the Premises and shall be deemed included in all subleases under this Lease whether or not expressly incorporated therein: (a) Lessee hereby assigns and transfers to Lessor ali of Lessee's interest in all Rent payable on any sublease, and Lessor may collect such Rent and apply same toward Lessee's obligations under this Lease; provided, however, that until a Breach shall occur in the performance of Lessee's obligations, Lessee may collect said Rent· Lessor shall net, by reason of the foregoing or any assignment of such sublease, nor by reason of the collection of Rent, be deemed liable to the sublessee for any failure of Lessee to pertorm and comply with any of Lessee's obligations to such sublessee. Lessee hereby irrevocably authorizes and directs any such sublessee, upon receipt of a written notice fi`om Lessor stating that a Breach exists in the performance of Lessee*s obligations under this Lease, fo pay to Lessor all Rent due and to become due under the sublease· Sublessee shall rel~' upon any such notice from Lessor and shall pay all Rents to Lessor w~thout any obligation or hght to inquire as to whether such Breach exists, nobeithntandleg any ctaim from Lessee to Page7 of 11 ©1997 - American industrial Real Estate Association REVISED FORM STN-6-2/97E the time of termination; (ii) the worth at the time of award ol the amount by which the unpaid rant which would have been earned after termination until the time of award exceeds the amount of such rental loss that the Lessee proves could have Peen reasonably avoided; (iii) the woAh at the time of award of the amount by which the unpaid rent for the balance of the term after the time ol award exceeds the amount of such rental loss that the Lessee proves could be reasonably avoided; and (iv} any other amount necessa~'/to compensate Lessor for all foe detriment proximately caused by the Lesse~'s failure to perform ils obligations under this Lease or which in the ordinary course of things would be likely fu result therefrom, incteding but not limited to the cost of recovering possession of the Premises, expenses of relethng, inct eding necessary renovation and alteration o[ the Premises, reasonable attorneys' fees, and that portion of any leasing commission paid by Lessor in connscrion with this Lease applicable to the unexpired thn'n of this Lease. The worth al the time of award of the amount referred to in provision (iii) of the immediately preceding sentence shall be computed by discounting such amount at the discount rate of the Federal Reserve Bank of the District within which the Premises are located at the time of award plus one percent (1%), Effeds by Lessor to mitigate damages caused by Lessee's Breach of this Lease shall not waive Lassor's right to recover damages under Paragraph 12. If termination of this Lease is obtained through the provisional remedy of unlawful detainer, Lessor shall have the right to recover in such proceeding any unpaid Rent and damages as are recoverable therein, or Lessor may resewe the right to recover all or any part thereof in a separate suit. if a notice and grace period required under Paragraph 13.t was not previously given, a notice to pay rent or quit, or to perform or quit given to Lessee under the unlawful detainer statute shall also constitute the notice required by Paragraph t3.1. In such case, the applicable grace period required by Paragraph 131 and the unlawful detainer statute shall run concurrently, and the failure of Lessee to cure the Oefault within the greater of lhe two such grace pededs shall constitute both an unlawful detainer and a Breach of this Lease entitling Lessor to the remedies provided for in this Lease and/or by said statute. (b) Continue the Lease and Lessee's right to possession and recover the Rent as it becomes due, in which event Lessee may sublet or assign, subject only to masonedfe limitations, Acts of maintenance, effods to relet, and/or the appointment of a receiver to protect the Lessoris interests. shall not constitute a termination of the Lesseeis right to possession. (c} Pursue any other remedy now or hereafter available under the laws or judicial decisions of the state wherein the Premises are located. The expiration or termination of this Lease and/or the termination of Lessee's dght to possession shall not relieve Lessee from liability under any indemnity provisions of this Lease as to matters occurring or accruing during the term hereof or by reason of Lessee's occupancy of the Premises. 13.3 Inducement Recapture. Any agreement for free or abated rent or other charges, Or for the giving or paying by Lessor to or for Lessee of any cash or other bonus, inducement or consideration for Lesseeis entering into this Lease/ all of which concessions are hereinafter referred fu as "inducement Provisions." shall be deemed conditioned upon Lessee's full and faithful perfomlance of all of the terms, covenants and conditions of this Lease. Upon Breach of this Lease by Lessee, any such Inducement Provision shall automatically be deemed deleted from this Lease and of no further force or effect, and any rent, other charge, bonus, inducement or consideration theretafore abated, given or paid by Lessor under such an Inducement Provision shall be immediately due and payable by Lessee ta Lessor, notwithstanding any subsequent cum of said Breach by Lessee, The acceptance by Lessor of Rent or the cure of tbe Broach which initiated the operation of this paragraph shall not be deemed a waiver by Lessor of the pmvisidns of this paragraph unless spec~cally so stated in writing by Lessor at the time of such acceptance. 13,4 Late Charges. Lessee hereby acknowledges that late payment by Lessee of Rent will cause Lessor to incur costs not cordempidted by this Lease, the exact amount of which wilt pe extremely difficult to ascedain. Such costs include, but are not limited to. processing and accounting charges, and late charges which may be imposed upon Lessor by any Lender. Accordingly. if any Rent shall not be received by Lessor within ~we (5) days affer such amount shall Pe due, then, without any requirement for notice to Lessee. Lessee shall pay to Lessor a one4ime late charge equal to ten percent (10%) of each such overdue amount. The Pardes hereby agree that such late charge represents a fair and reasonable estimate of the costs Lessor will incur by reason of such late payment. Acceptance of such late charge by Lessor spell in no event constitute a waiver of Lessee's Default or Breach with respect to such overdue amount, nor prevent the exemise of any of the other rights and remedies granted hereunder, th the event that a late charge is payable hereunder, whether or not collected, for three (3) consecutive installments of Base Rent. then notwithstanding any provision of this Lease to the contrary, Base Rent shall, at Lessor's option, become due and payable quarterly in advance. 13.5 thtamsL Any monetary payment due Lessor hereunder, other than late charges, not received by Lessor, when due as to scheduled payments (such as Base Rent) or within thirty (3,0) days following the date on which it was due for non-scheduled payment, shall pear interest from the date when due. as to scheduled payments, or the ththy-first (31st) day after it was due as to non-scheduled payments. The interest ("Interest") charged shall be equal to the prime rate reported in the Wall Street Journal as published closest prior to the date when due bfus four percent (4%), but shall not exceed the maximum rate allowed by law. Interest is payable in addition to the potential late charge provided for in Paragraph 13.4. 13.6 Breach by Lessor. (a} Notice of Breach. Lessor shall not pe deemed in breach of this Lease unless Lessor fails within a reasonable time to Pertorm an obligation required to Pe performed by Lessor, For purposes of this Paragraph. a reasonable time shall in no event be less than thirty (30) days affer receipt by Lessor, and any Lender whose name and address shall have been furnished Lessee in writing for such purpose, of written notice specifying wherein such obligation of Lessor has not been perfon~ed; provided, however, that if the nature of Lessor's obligation is such that more than thi~y (30} days are reasonably required for its pedormance, then Lessor shait not pe in broach if performance is cemmenced within such thirty (30) day peded and thereafter diligently pursued to completion. (b) Performance by Lessee on Behalf of Lessor. In the event {hat neither Lessor nor Lender cures said breach within thirty (30) days after receipt of said notice, or fi having commenced said cure they do not dBgengy pursue it to completion, then Lessee may elect to cure said breach at Lessee's expense and offset from Rent an amount equal to the greater of one month's Base Rent or the Security Oeposit, and to pay an excess of such expense under protest, reserving Lesseeis hght to reimbursement from Lessor. Lessee shall document the cost of said cure and supply said documentation to Lessor. 14. Condemnation. If the Premises or any portion thereof are taken under the power of eminent domain or sold under the threat of the exemise of said bower (collectively "CondemnaBon'), this Lease shall terminate as to the part taken as of the date the condemning aut hedly takes title or possession, whichever first occurs~ if more than ten percent (10%) of any building portidn 0f the Premises, or more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the idnd aras portion of the Premises not occupied by any building, is taken by Condemnation. Lessee may, at Lessee's option, to pe exercised in witting within ten (10) days after Lessor shall have given Lessee written notice of such taking (or in the absence of such notice, within ten (10) days after the condemning authority chait have taken possession) terminafo this Lease as of the date the condemning authority takes such possession. If Lessee does not terminate this Lease in accordance with the foregoing, this Lease shall remain in full force and etfo~ as to the portion of the Premises remaining, except that the Base Rent chait pe reduced in proportion to the reduction in utility of the Premises caused by such Condemnation. Condemnation awards and/or payments shait pe the property of Lessor. whether such award shall be made as compensation for diminution in value of the leasehold, the value of the part taken, or for severance damages; provided, however, that Lessee shall be entitled to any compensaben for Lessee's relocation expenses, loss of business goodwill and/or Trade Fixtures, without regard to whether or not this Lease is terminated pursuant to [he provisions of this Paragraph. All Alterations and Utility Installations made th the Premises by Lessee, for purPoses of Condemnation only. shall be considered the property of the Lessee and Lessee shait be entitled to any and all compensation which is payable therefor. In the event that this Lease is not terminated by reason of the Condemnation, Lessor shall repair any damage to the Premises caused by such Condemnation. 15. Brokers' Fee. 15. t AddtBonal Commission. In addition to the payments owed pursuant to Paragraph 1.10 above, and unless Lessor and the Brokers otberwise agree in w~ing, Lessor agrees that: (a) if Lessee exercises any Option, (b) if Lessee ac~quires any rights to the Premises or other premises owned by Lessor and located within the same Project, if any, within which the Premises is idcatad, (c) if Lessee remains in possession of the Premises, with the consent of Lessor, after the expiration of this Lease, or (d) if Base Rent is inc~easeif, whether by agreement or operation of an escalation ciduse herein, then, Lessor shall pay Brokers a fee in accordance wffh the schedule of said Brokers in effect at the time of the execution of this Lease. 15.2 Assumption of Obligations. Any buyer or transferee of Lessor's interest in this Lease shall be deemed to have assumed Lesson's obligotidn hereunper. Each BrokershallbeathirdpartybeneficiaryofthepmidsionsofParagraphe 1.10, 15.22 and 31. IfLessor failstapoytoa Brokerany amounts due as and for commissions pertaining to this Lease when due, then such amounts shall accrue interest. In addition, if Lessor fails to pay any amounts to Lessee's Broker when due, Lassee's Broker may send written notice to Lessor and Lessee of such faiture and if Lessor fulls to pay such amounts within ten (10) days after said notice1 Lessee shall pay said monies to its Broker and offset such amounts against Rent. In addition. Lessee's Broker shall pe deemed to be a third party beneficiary of any commission agreement entered into by and/or petween Lessor and Lessor's Broker. 15.3 Representations and Indemnities of Broker Relationships. Lessee and Lessor each represent and warrant th the other that it has had no dealings with any person, firm, broker or finder (other than the Brokers, if any) in connection with this Lease, and that no one other than said named Brokers is entitled to any commission or flnde(s fee in connection herewith. Lessee and Lessor do each hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold the other harmless from and against liability for compensation or charges which may be teaimed by any such unnamed broker, finder or other similar pariy by reason of any dealings or actions of the indemnifying Par[y, including any costs, expenses, and/or attorneys' fees reasonabty incurred with respect thereto. 16. Estoppel Certificates, (a) Each Party (as "Responding Party") shall within ten (10) days after written notice from the other Party (the "Requesting Party") execute, acknowledge and deliver to the Requesting Party a statement in writing in form similar to the then most current "Estoppel Certificate" form pubJished by the Amedcan thdustdal Real Estate Association, plus such adthtionifi information, confirmation and/or statements as may be reasonably requested by the Requesting Pa~ty. (b) If the Responthng Party shall fail to execute or deliver the Estoppel Certificate within such ten day pedod, the Requesting Party may execute an Estoppel Certificate stating that: (i) the Lease is in full force and effect without medi§cation except as may be represented by the Requesting Parly, (ii) there are no uncured defaugs in the Requesting Party's perfonmance, and (iii) if Lessor is the Requesting Party, not more than one month's Rent has been pate in advance, Prospective purchasers and encumbrancers may rely upon the Requesting Pa~ty*s Estoppel Certificate, and the Responding Party shall be estopped from denying the truth of the facts contained in said Certificate. (c) If Lessor desires to §hence, refinance, or sel~ the Premises, or any par[ thereof, Lessee and all Guarantors she0 deliver' to any potential lender or purchaser designated by Lessor such financial statements as may be reasonably required by such lender or purchaser, including, but not limited to, Lessee's §nancial statements for the past three (3) years. All such flnandal statements shall be received by Lessor and such tender or purchaser in Page 9 of 11 Initials __ defenses which Lessee might have against any prior lessor;, or (iii) be bound by prepayment of more than one (1) month's rent. 30.3 Non-Dtsturbance. With respect to Security Devices entered into by Lessor after the execution of this Lease, Lessee's subordination of this Lease shall be subject to receiving a commercially reasonable non~tisturbance agreement (a "Non-Dtsturbance Agreement") from the Lender which Non-Disturbance Agreement provides that Lessee*s possession of the Premises, and this Lease, incJuthng any options to extend the term hereof, witl not be disturt~d so long as Lessee is not in Breach hereof and attoms to the record owner of the Premises. Fudher. wrihin sixty (60) days after the execution of this Lease, Lessor sheli use its commercially reasonable efforts to obtain a Non-Disturbance Agreement from the holder of any pre.existing Security Device whiob is secured by the Premises. In the event that Lessor is unable to provide the Non-Disturbance Agreement within said sixty (60) days, then Lessee may. at Lessee's option, directly contact Lessor's lender and attempt to negotiate for the execution and delivery of a Non-Disturbance Agreement. 30,4 Self-Executing. The agreements contained in this Paragraph 30 shall be effective without the execution of any ferther documents; provided, however, that, upon written request from Lessor or a Lender in connection w~h a sale, financing or refinancing of the premises, Lessee and Lessor shaJ~ execute such further wditngs as may be reasonably required to separately document any subordination, attomment and/or Non~isturbance Agreement provided for herein. 31. Attorneys* Fees. If any Party or Broker brings an action or proceeding involving the Premises to enforce the terms hereof or to declare tights hereunder, the Prevailing Par~ (as hereatter defined) in any such proceeding, action, or appeal thereon, shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees. Such fees may be awarded in the same suit or recovered in a separate suit, whether or not such action or proceeding is pursued {o decision or judgment. The term, "Prevailing Party" shall inclube, without limitation, a Party or Broker who substantially obtains or defeats the relief sought, as the case may be, whether by compromise, settlement, judgment, or the abandonment by the other Party or Broker of its ctaim or defense. The attorneys' fees award shall not be computed in accordance with any court fee schedule, but shall be such as to fully reimburse all attorneys' fees reasonably incun*ed. In addition, Lessor shall be entitled to artomeys* fees, costs and expenses incurred in the preparation and sehece of notices of Default and consultations in connection therewith, whether or not a lega[ action is subsequently commenced in connection with such Default or resuJting Breach. 32. Lessor's Access; Showing Promises; Repairs. Lessor and Lessor's agents shell have the right te enter the Premises at any time, in the case of an emergency, and otherwise at reasonable times for the purpose of showing the same to prospective purchasers, lenders, or lessees, and making such alterations, repairs, improvements or additions to the Premises as Lessor may deem necessary. All such activities shall be without abatement of rent or liability to Lessee. Lessor may at any time place on the Premises any ordinary '*For Sate" signs and Lessor may duheg the last six (6) months of the term hereof place on the Premises any ordinary *'For Lease" signs. Lessee may at any time place on or about the Premises any ordinary "For Sublease*' sign. 33. Auctions. Lessee shall not conduct, nor permit to be conducted, any auction upon the Premises without Lessot's prior written consent. Lessor shall not be obligated to exercise any standard of reasonableness in determining whether to permit an auction. 34. Signs. Except for ordinary 'For Sublease" signs, Lessee shall not place any sign upon the Premises without Lessor's pdor written consent. All signs must comply with all Applicabts Requirements. 35. Termination; Merger. Unless specifically stated otherwise in writing by Lessor, the voluntary or other surrender of this Lease by Lessee, the mutual termldation or cancellation hereof, or a termination hereof by Lessor for Breach by Lessee, shall automatically terminate any sobleese or lesser estate in the Premises; provided, however, that Lessor may elect to continue any one ot all existing subtenanciee, Lessor's failure within ten (10) days following any such event to elect to the contrary by written notice to the holder of any such lesser interest, shall constitute Lessor's election to have suctt event constitute Page 1 d of 'It Initials __ provisions hereof, the Party against whom the obligation to pay the money is asserled sha~l have the right to make payment "under protest" and such payment shall not be regaled as a votuntary payment and there shall survive the right on the par~ of said Party to institute suit for recovery of such sum. ~f it shall be adjudged that there was no legal obligation on the part of said Party to pay such sum Or any part thereof, said Party shall be entitled to recover such sum or so much/hereof as it was not leg ally required to pay, 44. Ai~thodty. If either Pa~ hereto is a corporation, trust, limitsd liability company, partnership, or similar entity, each individual executing this Lease on behalf of such entity represents and warrants that he or she is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Lease on gs behalf. Each Party shail, within thirty (30) days after request, deliver to the other Pa~ty satisfactory evidence of such authod[y. 45. ConflicL Any conflict hetv,~en /he pdnted provisions of this Lease and the typewritten or handwdffen provisions shall be controlled by the typewritten or handwritten provisions. 46. Offer. preparation of this Lease by either Party or their agent and submission of same to the other Party shall not be deemed an offer to lease to the other Party. This Lease is not intended to be binding unM executed and delivered by all Parties hereto. 47. Amendments, This Lease may be modified only in writing, signed by the Parties in interest at the time of the modification, AS long as they do not materially change Lessee's obligations hereunder, Lessee agrees to make such reasonable non-monetary medific-~tions to this Lease as may be reasonably required by a Lender in connection with the obtaining of normal flnancthg or relthancing of the Premises. 48. MurtipJe Parties. If more than one person or entity is named herein as either Lessor or Lessee, such multiple Parties shall have joint and several responsibility to comply with the terms of this Lease. 49. MedlaBon and Arbitration of Disputes. An Addendum requidng the Mediation and/or the Arbitration of all disputes between the Padies and/or Brokers adsing out of this Lease [] is [] Is not attached to this Lease. LESSOR AND LESSEE HAVE CAREFULLY READ AND REVIEWED THIS LEASE AND EACH TERM AND PROVISION CONTAINED HEREIN, AND BY THE EXECUTION OF THIS LEASE SHOW THEIR INFORMED AND VOLUNTARY CONSENT THERETO. THE PARTIES HERESY AGREE THAT, AT THE TIME THIS LEASE IS EXECUTED, THE TERMS OF THIS LEASE ARE COMMERCIALLY REASONABLE AND EFFEC~JATE THE INTENT AND PURPOSE OF LESSOR AND LESSEE WITH RESPECT TO THE PREMISES. ~,TTENTION: NO REPRESENTATION OR RECOMMENDATION IS MADE BY THE AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATION OR BY ANY 3ROKER AS TO THE LEGAL SUFFICIENCY, LEGAL EFFECT, OR TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THIS LEASE OR THE TRANSACTION TO WHICH IT ~ELATES, THE PARTIES ARE URGED TO: SEEK ADVICE OF COUNSEL AS TO THE LEGAL AND TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THIS LEASE. RETAIN APPROPRIATE CONSULTANTS TO REVIEW AND INVESTIGATE THE CONDITION OF THE PREMISES. SAID INVESTIGATION SHOULD ICLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO: THE POSSIBLE PRESENCE OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES, THE ZONING OF THE PREMISES, THE ~TRUCTURAL INTEGRFIY, THE CONDITION OF THE ROOF AND OPERATING SYSTEMS, AND THE SUITABILITY OF THE PREMtSBS FOR .ESSEE'S INTENDED USE. NARNING: IF THE PREMISES IS LOCATED IN A STATE OTHER THAN CALIFORNIA, CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE LEASE MAY NEED TO BE ~EVISED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE IN WHICH THE PREMISES IS LOCATED. The parties hereto have executed tths Lease at the pidce and on the dates specified above their respective signatures. on:March , 2001 By LESSOR: Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula on: March , 2001 ffykESSEE: By: Name Pdnted: Name Pdnted: Title:Executive Director Title: By: By: Name Pdnted: Name Pfintsd: Title: Title: Address: Address: Reeves Trust dated July 251 1990 By: Telephone: (__) Telephone: (__) Facsimiid: (__) Facsimile: (__) Federal ID No. Federal ID No. NOTE: These forms are often modified to meet the changing requirements of law and industry needs. Always write or call to make sure you are utilizing the most current form: AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATION, 700 So. Flower Street, Suite 600, Los Angeles, California 90017. (213) 687-8777. Fax No. (213) 687-8616 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATION OPTION TO PURCHASE Standard Lease Addendum DatedApril 1, 2001 By and Between (Lessor)Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula (Lessee) Donna L. Reeves, as Trustee of the Donna L. Reeves Trust dated July 25, 199 Address of Premises: 27500 Jefferson Avenue, Riverside, CA (a) Lessor hereby grants to Lessee an option to purchase Ihe Premises upon the terms and conditions herein set forth. (b) In order to exercise this option to purchase, Lessee must give written notice of the exercise of the option to Lessor during the period from (i) Esc~ow shall dose on the date set forth in paragraph (d) above; (ii) Lessor shall deposit the check referred to ia paragraph (b) into escrow upon opening thereof, with the balance of the purchase price to be deposited into escrow no later then 11:00 A.M. on the business day prior to the expected closing date; (iii) The parties agree to execute any adthtional i,~structio~s as are normal and us~Jal; (iv) The balance of the terms and conditions of sale shall be as set forth in the American Industrial Real Estate Association "STANDARD OFFER, AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PURCHASE OF REAL ESTATE". a copy of which is attached hereto, exceptforthefollowing:premises sold as is and paragraphs 4.2; 5; 6; g,1 a.b,c,d,e,h,iJ, and k; and 20, which do not apply. RDA DEPARTMENTAL REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINA,N~ CITY MANAGER TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members John Meyer, Redevelopment Director March 27, 2001 Monthly Departmental Report Attached for your information is the monthly report as of March 27, 2001 for the Redevelopment Department. First Time Homebuyers Pro,qram Funding in the amount of $200,000 is available for FY 00-01. One loan has closed for $24,000. Residential Improvement Pro.qrams The program budget for FY 00/01 is $250,000 and $168,000 has been funded. Affordable Housing Two projects have been submitted for preliminary review. One project is from the Agency's development partner, the other from a property owner who is also interested in developing affordable housing. Staff is analyzing these proposals. Senior HousinR Agency staff is negotiating with a development partner to rehab 96 units for affordable senior housing. A senior housing demand study is being conducted. Old Town Community Theater The architect, Fisher Merriman Sehgal and Yanez Inc., has conducted stakeholder and community interviews and has completed the schematic phase of the project. Peliminary floor plans and elevations were reviewed by the Community Theater Advisory Committee on January 22, 2000. The Old Town Local Review Board and Community Services Commission recommended approval of the master plan for the Theater at their February 12, 2000 meetings. The City Council will review the conceptual plan at its April 24 meeting. R:~SYERSKWIONTH LLY~report.mad) 1 .doc Old Town Tradin~l Poet Agency staff is handling the acquisition and relocation of tenants of the Trading Post property. Escrow closed on August 25, 2000, Facade Improvement/Non-Conforming Si,qn Program The following facade improvement/sign projects have recently been completed: · Butteffield Inn Paint and Sign · Grace Garden Gift Shop Signs · Romans Sew & Vac Signs · The Country Goose Signs The following facade improvements are underway: · Rooster Creek Crossing Signs · Rhythem & Brews Signs · The Health Insurance Agency Signs · M & M Art and Fram Signs · Waves of Beauty Signs · The Old Tin Box Signs · Y's & O's Signs · Old Town promotions/Marketing The Bluegrass Festival was held on March 24 and 25 and featured 4-5 bands daily on two stages. The Agency is also sponsoring several other events over the next few months. The events include Western Days scheduled for April 7 & 8; Dixieland Jazz Festival scheduled for May 12 and 13 featuring 3-4 bands daily on two stages; and the Street Painting Festival scheduled for June 2 & 3 featuring numerous artists displaying their chalk art on the streets of Old Town. RASYER SK'~vIONTHLLYVeport.marO1 .doc ITEM 8 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR.OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager~'~''- Mamh 27, 2001 Morgan Hill Specific Plan No. 313 PREPARED BY: Stephen Brown, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: (1) Formally adopt the attached recommended Condition of Approval for the Morgan Hill Specific Plan traffic mitigation measure for presentation to the Riverside County Board of Supervisors; and (2) Endorse the creation of an Urban Limit Line within the unincorporated territory of Riverside County east of the Morgan Hill Specific Plan and direct staff to prepare a map of said line for approval by the Council and subsequent submittal to the County Board of Supervisors. BACKGROUND: At their March 20, 2001 regular hearing, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors continued the public hearing for the Morgan Hill Specific Plan to April 10, 2001. The Morgan Hill Specific Plan proposes 1,295 residential units on 400 acres of citrus groves and vacant land. For the past two years City staff has been providing written comments and attended numerous meetings and hearings on this project. These discussions have centered on mitigation for traffic impacts and an urban growth boundary to be established in the County. Since this matter was first discussed by the Board of Supervisors, there have been several meetings between the County and the City regarding this project. The City Council appointed a sub-committee comprised of Councilmembers Stone and Roberts to participate in meetings with Supervisor Buster's office. Members of City staff were also participants in the negotiations. Out of these discussions, the City has been successful in getting the developer to accept that they are responsible for approximately 1.5 million dollars in off-site road improvements along the Hwy. 79 South corridor between Pala Road and 1-15. Moreover, the developer committed to provide the money up front, prior to the issuance of any building permits to be used exclusively for road improvements as described above. R:\BROWNS~agency ~eview~sp 313 cc st~ff rpt 3-21-0 l.doc I An additional issue that was discussed in these meetings related to the establishment of an urban limit line east of this proposed project. City Council and Staff requested that Supervisor Buster and the Board not permit any further urbanization beyond this point. Supervisor Buster was supportive of the request and pledged to take the matter back to the entire Board for consideration. Subsequent to the March 20, 2001 public hearing on this project, Supervisor Buster requested that this matter be agendized for discussion by the City Council, so that the City's position relative to the project and the two aforementioned issues is formalized prior to the next Board hearing. The recommended Condition of Approval is as follows: Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the developer shall pay an environmental mitigation fee for traffic impacts in the amount of $1,500,000.00. Said fee shall be deposited in a trust fund account established for the purpose of funding road and interchange improvements along the Highway 79 South corridor west of Pala Road. The City of Temecula and the County of Riverside shall jointly agree to the use the mitigation fee and the structure of the trust account. This mitigation fee shall fully mitigate existing and future traffic impacts from the Morgan Hill Specific Plan in the City of Temecula along the Highway 79 South corridor from Pala Road west up to and including the interchange at I-15. In the event that the improvements needed to mitigate traffic impact from Morgan Hill along the mentioned reach of Highway 79 South are no longer needed or have been funded by alternative sources, the account may be used to fund other traffic related improvements in the area within the City of Temecula. FISCAL IMPACT: If approved by the County, 1.5 million dollars will be provided by the developer of the Morgan Hill Specific Plan to pay for improvements to infrastructure on State Highway 79 South. Attachment: 1. Riverside County Planning Commission Staff Report Dated October 25, 2000 - Page 3 R:lbrownS~agency rev/ew~p 313 cc staffrpt 3-21-01.doc 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATED OCTOBER 25, 200'1 R:\brownS~agency review~sp 313 cc staff q~t 3-21-0 l.doc 3 Zoning Area: Rancho California Supervisorial District: First E.I.R. Number: 412 Regional Team No.: Specific Plans Project Planner: James Quirk, AICP SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 313 CGPA NO. 475 CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 6397 Planning Commission: 10/25/00 Agenda Item No.: 4.5 Applicant: Temecula Ranchos 4, LP Engineer/Rep.: T&B Planning Consultants RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION: · Specific Plan No. 313 is a master planned community of 478.3 acres within the Rancho California area. The project is located south of Highway 79 and NighthaWk Pass, east of Butterfield Stage Road, north of Monte Verde Road, and west of Anza Road. The project is comprised of 1,436 dwelling units on 340.9 acres, 4.3 acres for commercial and daycare facilities, 12.1 acres for parks, 12.3 acres devoted for schools, 81.7 acres of open space, 2.2 acres of paseos (walls), and 24.8 acres devoted to major roads. Comprehensive General Plan Amendment No. 475 is a proposal to change the Open Space and Conservation Map designation from "Agriculture" to "Adopted Specific Plan No. 313," to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and to amend the Southwest Area Community Plan's Land Use Allocation Map designations from "Agriculture 10 ac. min." to "Temecula Ranchos SP No. 31Y'. Change of Zone No. 6397 proposes to change the existing zoning designations of Light Agriculture, 10 acre minimum (A-l-10), Light Agriculture, 20 acre minimum (A-I-20), and R-R (Rural Residential) to SP (Specific Plan). The SP zoning designation will establish those development standards required to implement the Specific Plan. SUMMARY: 1. Existing Land Use (Exh. #1): 2. Surrounding Land Use (Exh. #1): 3. Existing Zoning (Exh #2): 4. Surrounding Zoning (Exh. $$2): 5. Comprehensive General Plan (Exh. $$5): Comprehensive General Plan (Exh. #6A) Sphere of Influence Vacant, Citrus farming Single family residential, Vacant land R-R, A-l-10, A-l-20 R-R, A-l-5, A-l-10, R-A-5, R-A-20, C/V Southwest Area Plan (SWAP) Land Use: Agriculture - 10 AC Min Open Space and Conservation Map Designation: Agriculture None STAFF REPORT: PC 10/25/00 SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 313, CGPA NO. 475, CZ NO. 6397 PAGE 2 OF 5 8. Environmental Concerns: See Environmental Impact Report No. 412. RECOMMENDATION: DISCUSSION AND CONTINUANCE OF DECISION ON COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 475, SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 313, AND CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 6397; OR APPROVAL OF STAFF'S REDUCED DENSITY ALTERNATIVE FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 313, AND APPROVAL OF COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 475 AND CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 6397. .) SPECIFIC PLAN ANALYSIS: Planning Staff has reviewed the proposed development plan of Specific Plan No. 313 and has determined that several issues require further clarification and analysis. LAND USE COMPATIBILITY - A review of the project's design has raised several issues regarding the proposed residential lots sizes as they relate to adjacent land uses. As shown on Morgan Hill page V.A-6, north and west of the project site is the Red Hawk Specific Plan (SP 217) and the Vall Ranch Specific Plan (SP 223). The densities within Planning Areas 2, 4, 5, 11 and 14 are compatible with the adjacent residential uses of SP 217 and SP 223. (See Specific Land Use Plan, page m.A-4.) However, Planning Areas 3 and 8, which propose 177 ..single-family lots (6,000 and 7,000 square foot minimum) are adjacent to the ".4 DU/AC" (i.e. 2 ~ acre minimum) designated area of the Southwest Area Community Plan (SWAP). Also, Planning Areas 10, 15, and 19, which propose 539 single- family lots (6,000, 7,000, and 8,000 square foot minimum) are adjacent to the "10 Acre Minimum" designated area in SWAP. The Planning Department recommends that lot sizes be increased in the southern planning areas to provide better land use transition and fewer compatibility issues between urban and rural residential uses. GRADING PLAN - The project's Topographic Map (page V.B-2) renders an area of significant slopes stretching from this project's central boundary with SP 217 eastward. The Grading Plan (page I11.A-28) appears to show that several steep hills on the project site will be reduced by 40 feet in height during project STAFF REPORT: PC 10/25/00 SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 313, CGPA NO. 475, CZ NO. 6397 PAGE 3 OF 5 development. Since the site otherwise contains more rolling terrain, the Planning Department is of the opinion that the grading plan should retain these slopes in order to maximize the design possibilities of these disparate elements. OPEN SPACE - The Specific Land Use Plan (page rlI.A-4) docs render a portion of the slopes referenced above as open space. But the open space is discontinuous, split between Planning Areas 1, 13, and 20. This tends to inhibit its usefulness and hinder its maintenance. Also, the proposed project would create manufactured slopes of 10 feet or greater throughout the project, and several slopes of 30 feet or greater at locations which pose the greatest challenge to developing the site. Some slopes as high as 70 feet have been proposed. The Planning Department would like to see more of the natural slope areas preserved in open space, connecting from the proposed Butterfield Stage Road extension to the southeastern comer of the project near Anza Road. The Planning Department is of the opinion that estate lots north of Morgan Hill Drive and west of Butterfield Stage Road would better preserve landform. Also, staff would be interested in more extensive information on the vegetative treatments that will be provided to both natural and manufactured slopes as the project is realized. DES ION CRITERIA - The Planning Department would like the design criteria strengthened to help provide better screening of the project from adjacent rural residential uses. One thought would be to retain some of the citrus trees now occupying the site as a design accent and buffer along the project's entire southeastern boundary east of B utterfield Stage Road, to a depth of approximately 40 feet. The siting of homes needs to respect the viewscape which the site occupies by assuring that rooftops will be below ridge elevations throughout. Also, if a gas station is sited in Planning Area 22, at the intersection of Morgan Hill Drive and Butterfield Stage Road, the following criteria should be implemented: (I) the building needs to be located adjacent to the intersection comer and appropriately landscaped, and (2) the pumps 'should be located toward the site's interior, and (3) access drives should be located well away from the intersection comer. This proposed specific plan would materially change the overall land use policy for the project area as identified in the SWAP. While the Planning Department recognizes that long-term development trends in this area would tend to support the development of this site in residential uses, staff does not support the proposed project's density. The applicant's proposed Reduced Density Alternative might be acceptable to the Planning Department if more detail is provided and if the proposal addresses the issues under "Specific Plan Analysis" above. Staff has included Exhibit 7 in this staff report summarizing the existing project proposal. Exhibit 8 shows the Planning Department's preliminary concept of a Reduced Density Alternative. STAFF REPORT: PC 10/25/00 SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 313, CGPA NO. 475, CZ NO. 6397 PAGE 4 OF 5 RELATIONSHIP TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY INTEGRATED PLANNING PROJECT: Proposed Specific Plan (SP) No. 313 and General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 475 may be affected by the Riverside County Integrated Planning Project (RCIP - see the attachment entitled Riverside County Integrated Planning Project and Applications for General Plan Amendments and Specific Plans for information about the RCIP) as currently proposed. Proposed GPA No. 475 and SP No. 313 are located within the proposed Southwest Area Plan of the new" General Plan. As currently proposed through the area plan "vision" map, the site would continue to be designated as Agriculture, as it is today under the existing Southwest Area Community Plan. The vicinity of the site is an area of transition from urban uses on the west and rural residential and agricultural uses to the north, east, and south. As currently proposed, the predominantly residential project would not be compatible with the proposed agricultural emphasis oftbe vision map. However, since this is an area of stark contrast between existing urban and adjacent roral uses, it may be appropriate to explore the possibility of executing a well-planned transition between the two lifestyles directly on the site. The proposed project is located along the southern reach of the potential Temecula-Beaumont CETAP (Community and Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process) north-south transportation corridor. As currently envisioned, the corridor would be routed southward from the community of Winchester, along Winchester Road, then along Washington Street, and then along Butterfield Stage Road through the site, to Anza Road. It would then turn westward along one of two potential alternative routes leading to 1-15 south of the City of Temecula. One alternative would use Fairview Avenue, and the other would be routed to the south through the Pechanga Indian Reservation. It should be noted that last year, an amendment was processed to the Circulation Element of the General Plan to extend Butterfield Stage Road as a Secondary Highway (88'right-of-way) from Nighthawk Pass Road to Anza Road. IfButterfield Stage Road is selected as part of a CETAP corridor, additional right-of-way may be required and there may be additional access restrictions along its route. The proposed project lies along the edge of Conservation Analysis Unit (CALl) S3-O of the proposed Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). CAU S3-G is oriented along Temecula Creek.Temecula Creek actually passes through a property adjoining the site to the n~rth, the Redhawk Specific Plan (SP No. 217). In SP No.217, the area along the creek, including the area adjoining SP No. 313, is proposed for designation as Open Space. Within SP No. 313, the edge adjacent to the SP No. 217 open space area is also proposed for an approximate 9.1 acre open space area. This feature would enhance the potential wildlife corridor function of Temecula Creek as articulated primarily through SP No. 217, and therefore would be compatible wirth the potential direction of MSHCP. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 412 Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 412 was prepared and circulated as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the Riverside County Rules to Implement CEQA. The comment period on the Draft EIR closed on January 12, 2000. A significant number of comments were received and STAFF REPORT: PC 10/25/00 SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 313, CGPA NO. 475, CZ NO. 6397 PAGE $ OF $ these comments were forwarded to the applicant's representative for preparation of a draft set of Responses to Comments. The applicant's representative has submitted these Responses to Comments, and incorporated them into the Specific Plan/EIR document. The Planning Department has reviewed the responses prepared by the applicant, and required any revisions that are necessary such that each comment is adequately addressed. Copies of the Responses to Comments document have been provided to commenting agencies and individuals consistent with CEQA requirements. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE . TRANSPORTATION AND LAND MANAGEMENT AGENCY Richard K. Lashbrook Agency Director T. !1. lngra~ David E. BanOu~t Attt~ $. t ~,*nce RIVERSIDE COLrNTY INTEGRATED PLANNING PROJECT and APPLICATIONS FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS AND SPECIFIC PLANS Riverside County is currently preparing a new General Plan for the entire County, a Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) for the Western portion of the County, and, along with the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), jointly preparing a new major transportation corridor plan (Community and Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process - CETAP) for the Western portion of the County. All of these plans are being jointly developed and coordinated as the Integrated Planning Project. This project was begun in Spring 1999, and is expected to take three years to complete, including all necessary environmental documentation and regulatory approvals at the local, state, and federal levels. During the first year, the County and RCTC sought broad public input to establish an overall vision for the County's future, and gathered much of the data needed to prepare the plans. During the second (current) year, the draft plans are being prepared, public feedback is being sought, and environmental reports will be prepared and circulated for public and agency reviews. The third and final year will be earmarked for public hearings and the final steps in the approval process. During the remaining two-year period that the new plans are under preparation, the potential effectiveness and benefits of the concepts that are being developed through them could be reduced by ongoing, piecemeal approvals of individual land development applications, which are not at this time required to be compatible with the emerging Integrated Planning Project concepts. The County has determined that the development review process would be well served by ensuring that all parties involved in it - developers, citizens, Planning Commissioners, etc. - are aware of the Integrated Planning Project proposals now, so that they can identify and discuss, as appropriate, any opportunities that are available to improve the overall quality of land use planning in the County. Accordingly, on April 18, 2000, the Board of Supervisors approved an Interim (while the Integrated Planning Project is under preparation) Project Information Distribution policy which, among other actions, requires that County staffprovide the Planning Commission with an analysis of how proposed General Plan Amendments and: Specific Plans and amendments to them relate to currently proposed Integrated Planning Project products. This analysis is being included with the staff reports to the Planning Commission for these projects. For additional information about the new General Plan, please contact Mr. Jerry Jolliffe, Administrative Manager, Riverside County Transportation and Land Management Agency (TLMA), at (909) 955-3161, or by e-mail at: jjolliff@ co. riverside, c&us. For information about the CETAP transportation corridor plan, please contact Mr. Ed Studor, Administrative Manager, TLMA, at (909) 955-6767, or by e-mail at: estudor@ co. rfverside, ca. us. For information about the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, please contact Ms. Kristi Lovelady, Administrative Manager, TLMA, at (909) 955-9514, or by e-mail at: klovelad@ co. riverside, ca. us. July 17. 2000 4080 Lemon Street, 7th Floor · Riverside, California 92501 · (909) 955-6838 P. O. Box 1605 · Riverside, California 92502-1605 · FAX (909) 955-6879 VAC VAC VAC GROVI VAC [] VAC VAC VAC VA( VAC HILLS CZ6397 CGPA475 SP31 LAND USE 14 TSSR2W "~ 952-23 CALIFORNIA ~ lST 10/12/00 CC RANCHO 979 J3 1" 50' RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT CZ6397 CGPA475 SP313..~~~ I PROPOSED ZONING ~ 14 T8SR2W I~ 952-23 ~ RANCHO OALIFORNIA J~ 1. = I450' RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT .4 DU MOUNTAIN( AREAS CZ6397 CGPA475 SP31 PROPOSED CODMUNITY PLA Ex,5 14 TSSR2W :~' 952-23 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ~l ,=~ 979 J3 10/12/0 CC RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT .4 DI SP21 MOUNTAINI AREAS 1" = 1450' CZ6397 C6PA475 SP31 ROPOSED OPENSPACE & CONV xo6A 14 T8$R2W ~ 952-23 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ~ lsT ~ 979 J3 10/12/00 ~' CC RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mor_qan .qP_dl ~.$m:mcPL~N ,) ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~.~ Z-~ ~.0 127 14 ~.6 2-5 5.0 205 ~ - 5~ ~ 4 24.7 2-5 5~ 124 ~u - 6~ ~ 2 17.4 2-5 4.1 71 S 21.0 2-5 4.4 10 50.8 2-5 4.2 214 11 ~.6 Z-5 4.4 195 ~ - 7~ ~ 8 ~2 2-5 ~ 15 49.7 2-5 S~ ~ - 8~ ~ 19 ~,4 2-5 ~,0 ~b~u~ ~0.9 4~ 1,436 ~,~ ~ ~ ~1 7 ' 12.3 N~ p~ 6 7.1 16 5.0 ~ s~/~ ~ ~.~ IA 9 9,~ ' .- 9& 6,6 12 6,5 IS 16,9 17 9.1 18 2.9 20 8.0 Zl ~ · Da~ ~ 4.3 ~ 112.6 ~J~ ~ 24.8 Specific ~ No. 313, gl~ No. 412 / ", ITEM 9 CITY ATTO DIRECTOR OF FINA~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City ManagedCity Council  Jsan W. Jones, City Clerk/Director of Support Services arch 27, 2001 SUBJECT: Rules of Order for Conduct of City Council Meetings RECOMMENDATION: Provide direction to staff whether to amend Resolution No. 94-79 regarding rules of order for conduct at City Council Meetings. BACKGROUND: it has been requested by Councilman Naggar to revisit Resolution No. 94-79 regarding the rules of order for the conduct of City Council Meetings. It is, therefore, being placed on the agenda for Council discussion and direction to staff. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 94-79 Agenda Reports/Rules of Order RESOLUTION NO. 94-79 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING RULES OF ORDER FOR ~ CONDUCT OF CITY COUNCIL MI~.TINGS The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby determine, resolve, and order as follows: Section 1. RI~I~,~CAIlg.Ma.~: A. The Mayor is responsible for conducting the meeting; and should not actively participate in discussion. The Mayor should reserve comment until all of the Councilmembers have spoken. B. The Mayor should require that all comment be directed to him/her. Cross talk between Councilmembers should be ruled out of order by the Mayor. Section 2. Rules of Order for City. Council Meetings - The City Council shall conduct business by motion in accordance with the following rules of order. A. ~ Any Councilmember wishing to speak must first obtain the floor by being recognized by the Mayor. The Mayor must recognize any Councilmember who seeks the floor when appropriately entitled to do so. B. ~. Time limitation on agenda items and items added on a subsequent need basis are as follows: 1. Each Councilmember shall be allowed three (3) minutes. Counc'flmembers shall not be allowed to defer any portion of their time to another Councilmember. However, unused time may be added to the second round of three minutes to each Councilmember following opening the discussion to the public for comment. 2. The Public comment portion shall be no more than 30 minutes. A member of the public who wishes to address the Council on an agenda item shall complete a request to speak form and submit it to the City Clerk. Each member of the public that has completed a request to speak form and has filed it with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item shall be given five (5) minutes to speak. C. Motions The Mayor or any member of the Council may call an action on any matter before the Council by making a motion. Before the motion can be considered or debated it must be seconded. Once the motion has been properly made and seconded, the Mayor shall open the matter for debate offering the first opportunity to debate to the moving party and, therealtex, to any Councilmember properly recognized by the Mayor. Once the motion has been fully debated and the Mayor calls for a vote, no further debate will be allowed, provided however, Councilmembers may be allowed to explain their vote. Council participation during the presentation of public testimony or staff reports shall be limited to questions asked at the conclusion of the testimony. No general discussion shall be permitted until the testimony is completed and a motion is on the floor. Council comment, not relevant to the motion should be reserved for the Council comment portion of the agenda. Comments inconsistent with this aforementioned should be ruled out of order by the Mayor. D. Ellting All Councilmembers present at a meeting when a motion comes up for a vote shall vote for or against the motion or abstain. If the vote is a voice vote, the mayor shall declare the result and note for the record all ~aye~ votes and all ~no~ votes. The Council may also vote by roll call upon request of the Mayor or a member of the Council. Regardless of the manner of voting, the results reflecting all *ayeu and Uno~ votes must be clearly set forth for the record. In order to be adopted, a motion requires the "aye~ vote of a. majority of the quorum present, unless the vote of three Councilmembers is required by statute, ordinance or resolution. An abstention shall not be counted as an 'aye~ or *no* vote, but the Councilmember abstaining shall be counted for the pm-pose of determining the quorum. A fie vote means no action has been taken. E. Procedural Rules of Order Once the main motion is properly placed on the floor, several related motions may be employed in addressing the main motion, and if properly made and seconded, must be disposed of before the main motion can be acted upon. The following motions are appropriate and may be made by the Mayor or any Councilmember at any appropriate time during the discussion of the main motion. They are listed in order of precedence. The first three subsidiary motions are not debatable; the last three are debatable. a. Lay on the Table/or Table Any Councilmember may more to lay the matter under discussion on the table. This motion temporarily suspends any further discussion of the pending motion without setting a time certain to resume debate. In order to bring the matter back before the Council, a motion must be adopted that the matter be taken from the table. A motion to take from the table must be made at the same meeting at which it was placed on the table or at the next meeting of the Council held within 14 calendar days of the original meeting. Otherwise the motion that was tabled dies, although it can be raised later as a new motion. b. Move Previous Ouesfion Any Councilmember may move to immediately bring the question being debat~t by the Council to a vote, suspending any further debate. The motion must be made and seconded without interrupting one who already has the floor. A majority vote of the quorum present is required for passage. c. limit or Extend lfimits of Debate Any Councilmember may vote to put limits on the length of debate. The motion must be made and seconded and requires a majority vote of the quorum present to pass. d. Pos_mone to a Time Certain/Continue Any Councilmember may move to postpone debate and action on the motion to a date and time certain. e. Commit or Refer Any Councilmember may move that the matter being discussed be referred to staff, a committee or a commission for further study. The motion may contain directions for the staff, committee or commission, as well as a date upon which the matter will be returned to the Council's agenda. If no date is set for returning the item to the Council agenda, any Councilmember may move, at any time, to require that the item be returned to the agenda. f. Amend Any Councilmember may amend the main motion or any amendment made to the main motion. Before the main motion may be acted upon, all amendments and amendments to the amendments must first be acted upon. an amendment must be related to the main motion or amendment to which it is directed. Any amendment which substitutes a new motion rather than amending the existing motion is out of order and may be so declared by the Mayor. 2. Motions of Privilege, Order and Convenience The following actions by the Council are to insure orderly conduct of meetings and for the convenience of the Mayor and Councilmembers. These motions take precedence over any pending main or subsidiary motion and may be debated except as noted. a. Call for Orders of the Day Any Councilmember may demand that the agenda be followed in the order stated therein. No second is required and the Mayor must comply unless the Council, by majority vote, sets aside the agenda order of the day. This motion is not debatable. b. ~ Any Councilmember, at any time during the meeting, may make a request of the Mayor to accommodate the needs of the Council or his/her personal needs for such things as reducing noise, adjusting air condition, ventilation, lighting, etc. Validity of question is ruled on by the Mayor. c. Recess Any Councilmember may move for a recess. No second is required and the Mayor must comply unless the Council, by majority vote, sets aside the motion. d. AIJj.03~ Any Councilmember may move to adjourn at anytime even if there is business pending. The motion must be seconded and a majority vote is required for passage. The motion is not debatable. e. Point of Order Any Councilmember may require the Mayor to enforce the rules of the Council by raising a point of order. The point of order shall be ruled upon by the Mayor. f. ~ Should any Councilmember be dissatisfied with a ruling from the Mayor, he/she may move to appeal the ruling to the full Council. The motion to appeal requires a second, and the ruling of the Mayor may be overturned by a majority vote. g. ,~usgmad_lhe.~m~ Any Councilmember may move to suspend the rules if necessary to accomplish a matter that would otherwise violate the rules. The motion requires a second and a majority vote is required for passage. h. ' ' ' ' Any Councilmember may move to divide the subject matter of a motion which is made up of several parts in order to vote separately on each part. This motion may also be applied to complex ordinances or resolutions. i. ~ Except for votes regarding matters which are quasijudicial in nature or matters where rights have vested by law or matters which require a noticed public hearing, the Council may reconsider any vote taken at the same meeting, but no later than the next regular meeting, to correct inadvertent or precipitant errors, or consider new information not available at the time of the vote. The motion to reconsider must be made by a Councilmember who voted on the prevailing side, must be seconded and requires a majority vote of the quorum for passage, regardless of the vote required to adopt the motion being reconsidered. ff the matter is to be reconsidered at the next reg,lar meeting, a Councilmember on the prevailing side must ask the City Clerk to place the matter on the agenda, or otherwise comply with Government Code Section 54956.5. The matter to be reconsidered takes no special preference over other pending matters and any special voting requirements related thereto still apply. Except pursuant to a motion to reconsider, once a matter has been determined and voted upon, the same matter cannot be brought up again at the same meeting. j. Rescind, Repeal or Annul The Council may rescind, repeal; or annul any prior action taken with reference to any legislative matter so long as the action to rescind, repeal or annul complies with all the rules applicable to the initial adoption, including any special voting or notice requirements or unless otherwise specified by law. 94-79 Section 3. ~ The Council shall have the authority to waive provisions of the procedures establish by this Resolution unless the procedure is required. Failure of the Council to follow the procedures established by this Resolution shall not invalidate or otherwise affect any action of the Council. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 26th day of July, 1994. Ron Roberts, Mayor AT'r~T: J~4~reek, City Clerk~ J [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 94-79 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 26th day of July 1994, by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Mufioz, Parks, Roberts NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS Stone jUne S. Greek, City Clef ITEM 10 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL . ../Z' J- CiTY ATTORNEY ~ D RECTOR OF F NANCE I CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer March 27, 2001 Public/Traffic Safety Commission Meeting Schedule Revision RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Approve modification of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting schedule to one regular meeting per month. 2. Adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE MEETING SCHEDULE OF THE PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION 3. introduce and read by title only an ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 2001- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION NO. 2.40.100 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO MONTHLY COMPENSATION FOR CITY COMMISSIONERS BACKGROUND: In February 1999 The City Council directed the Public/Traffic Safety Commission to increase their meeting schedule to two (2) regularly scheduled meetings on the second and fourth Thursday of each month. The purpose of the second monthly meeting was to address and expedite implementation of the selected short-term traffic circulation improvement projects. The second meeting also provided an opportunity to review related circulation issues and other neighborhood traffic safety issues requiring immediate attention. The short-term circulation improvement projects have been completed and other traffic circulation and safety issues are being addressed in a timely manner. The Commission has cancelled six meeting in seven months due to lack of agenda items. At the meeting of September 14, 2000 and on February 22, 2000, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission considered the feasibility of revising the meeting schedule to one regularly scheduled meeting per month. On February 22, 2000 The Commission recommended 3 to 1 (Commissioner Connerton dissenting) to modify their meeting schedule to one (1) regularly scheduled meeting per month. R:~AGDRPT~2001\0327\PTSC RESO ORD.doc 1 Should an issue arise that requires immediate attention, the Commission has the option to schedule a special meeting to address the issue. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 2001- 2. Ordinance No. 2001- R:~AGDRPT~2001\0327\PTSC RESO ORD.doc 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE MEETING SCHEDULE OF THE PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION Section 1. The Public/Traffic Safety Commission shall conduct business in accordance with the following guidelines. A. Meetings The Commission shall establish a regular date, time, and place within the City for the Commission meetings, which shall be open to the public. Said meetings shall occur no less frequently than once a month. However, the Commission may adjourn to any other location within the City. On such adjournment, the City Clerk shall cause to be posted on the door of the Council Chambers a notice of the other location and the time thereof. In the event that the date of any regular meetings falls on a holiday, the regular meeting shall be held on the next succeeding day which is not a holiday. The Commission shall conduct its meetings in a manner consistent with the protocols and procedures adopted by the City Council. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula, this 27~h day of March, 2001. ,Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk R:~AGDRPT~2001\0327\PTSC RESO ORD.doc 3 [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby cedify that the forgoing Resolution No. 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 27th day of March, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk R:~AGDRPT~.001\0327\PTSC RESO ORD.doc 4 ORDINANCE NO. 2001- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION NO. 2.40.100 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO MONTHLY COMPENSATION FOR CITY COMMISSIONERS. THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. The City Council for the City of Temecula hereby finds the following: A. That the City Council wishes to amend Section 2.40.100 to provide monthly compensation for City Commissioners. B. Monthly compensation for Commissioners is currently set at: Planning Commission Public Safety/Traffic Commission Community Services/Parks Commission $100 per month $100 per month, and $ 50 per month Section 2. Section 2.040.100 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read: "City Commissioners shall receive monthly compensation as follows: Planning Commission Public Safety/Traffic Commission Community Services/Parks Commission $100 per month $ 50 per month, and $ 50 per month." Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of April, 2001. ATTEST: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) R:~,GDRPT~2.001\0327\PTSC RESO ORD.doc 5 I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2001- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 27th day of March, 2001 and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 10th of April, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk R:~AGDRPT~2001\0327\PTSC RESO ORD.doc 6 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS APPROVAL t.,~..~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE~[~L"-, CITY MANAGER ~/~) TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council Howard Windsor, Acting City Fire Chief March 27, 2001 Monthly Depadmental Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Fire Department's Monthly Activity Report for the month of February 2001. City and fire staff continue to test laptops on two units within the City of Temecula. Staff has started testing software from an additional vendor to determine which software will best meet the fire department's needs. Staff is confident that a software selection will be made by May 2001, to move forward with the remaining laptop installations on the other units in the City of Temecula. Response Statistics for February 2001 Structure Fire 6 8 8 3 25 68 Vegetation Fire 2 0 1 1 4 17 Vehicle Fire 2 2 0 1 5 18 Fire - Other 3 3 2 6 14 Medical Aid 80 76 56 102 314 Fire Menace Standby 4 3 0 2 9 Public Service 7 5 3 13 28 27 566 25 51 Hazmat N/A Ringing Alarm 28 Responses Outside of th~ N/A TOTAL 132 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 39 7 12 86 228 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 136 77 140 485 1000 Medic Squad 84 Response Statistics Medic Squad 84 Time Statistics Medical Aids 147 305 Traffic Collisions Public Service Assists Structure Fires 38 2 84 9 0 1 9 28 Ringing Alarm 17 Vegetation Fire 1 Vehicle Fire 3 Rethse Fire 2 53 2 Hazmnt TOTAL 4 3 0 1 219 490 Average Response Time Longest Response Time Medic Squad Cancelled Prior to Patient Contact 4.8 min. 12 min. 84 Average Wait Time for AMR 3.7 min Medic Squad on Scene Prior to AMR - Medical Aids and Traffic Collisions 69 Performed *ALS prior to AMR's Arrival 35 *ALS - Advanced Life Support Medic Squad Comments: · Medic Squad 84 had 3 response times over 10 minutes for the month, the longest of which was 12 minutes. These reflect responses to the extreme North and Northeast end of the city, and the oriel2 minute response was do to a wrong location. · Wait time for AMR greater than 10minutes withALS initiated; 1 ~ 10mim/l~22min. · Community Service: 4 hours ~ Temecula Valley High School 8 hours ~ Chapparal High School Personnel 1 - Battalion Chief/Fire Marshal 4 - Fire Safety Specialist Fire Prevention 1 - Captain/Deputy Fire Marshal 3 - Fire System Inspectors 1 - Office Technician III Fire Plan Check Statistics mm 41 28 62 14 2 2O 15 1 0 0 17 38 0 238 Fire Prevention (Continued) Fire Inspection Statistics Fire Prevention Final Fire Prevention Shell 16 46 11 26 Fire-Underground Hydro Fire Thrust Block Fire Over Head Hydro Fire Flow Fire Flush Fire Sprinkler Final Fire Weld Inspection Fire Hood Duct Final Fire Pre- Wire Fire Alarm Final Fire Spray Booth Final Fire Safety Inspection Fire State Mandated Inspection Fire Special Events Inspection Fire Piping Hydro Fire Shear Valves Fire Over/Under Tank Final Fire Special Suppression System Fire Special Project Investigations Fire Administrative - Meetings etc... Fire Misc. Inspections Engine Co. Follow Up Enforcement 2 5 0 13 0 10 3 5 11 19 0 6 22 5 3 7 8 24 0 2 10 20 2 0 I0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 3 TOTAL 84 219 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Howard Windsor, Acting City Fire Chief Mamh 27, 2001 Annual Departmental Report RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file this report. Background: Attached for the City Council's review is the Fire Department's Annual Activity Report for the year 2000. Included within the report are afl of the responses for the four stations that respond within the City of Temecula. The total number of calls in 2000 was 6,204 was an increase of approximately 9% from 1999 (5,548 calls). This increase in calls is primarily due to the continued growth being experienced in and around the City. The Fire Department had many accomplishments in 2000. The Fire Prevention Bureau added a Deputy Fire Marshal and implemented a variety of cooperative changes in our fire prevention processes to enhance plan submittal turn around times and duplication of information from various City departments. In 2001, the Fire Prevention Bureau will focus on developing our information/education programs to meet the needs of the community. This will be done through school programs, community events, and the use of the media. Additionally, the bureau will further develop our fire permit program, as we realize this is an important mechanism for maintaining our cdtical facilities in a fire safe condition, which will reduce incident occurrence and/or impacts to life and property if an incident occurs. Operational successes in year 2000 included the benefits of the Medic Assessment Squad. This unit met the program goals and objective by showing an average response time of 4.46 minutes to all calls responded to within the City. The testing of laptops to enhance our fire service delivery was implemented during the year. City and Fire Department staffs continue working with two vendors to refine and develop a program that will truly meet the Fire Department's needs. Once the program is deemed efficient and effective, the remaining front line fire units will have their laptops installed. During the year a significant amount of staff time was spent developing a comprehensive Fire/EMS Master Plan to address future fire infrastructure needs. This Fire Master Plan will be brought before the Public Traffic/ Safety Commission for consideration before the City Council reviews the components of this plan. The master plan should come before the City Council later this year. Fire staff, in conjunction with City staff, also pursued grant monies from the State Office of Traffic Safety. These monies, if approved, would be used to reduce City costs for miscellaneous new and replacement equipment throughout the City's stations. The Temecula Volunteer Fire Company provided coverage at numerous community events in and around the City including the Rod Run, Tractor Races, and the Balloon and Wine Festival to name a few. The Volunteer Company, with assistance from paid staff, administers an academy for new recruits each year, to maintain a viable company to serve the community. This program is known as the Temecula Explorer Program. This program has had numerous successes and accomplishments with all "muster" competitions entered. Most significant was their placement in the LA County Muster where they placed 2n~ overall. This is an event where the level of competition is high and a significant number of teams participate. We are all very proud of this program and special thanks should be given to program coordinators Larry Nachtmann and Buck Longmore for the excellent job they do with this program. In 2001, there are many challenges the Temecula City Fire Services face in providing the highest quality fire service to the citizen of this fine City. Fortunately, many of the challenges we face already have strong foundation in place. It will be our responsibility as your fire department to continually look for proactive ways to meet these future challenges. We look forward to the upcoming year knowing that the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and Riverside County Fire Department is up to the task of continually servicing the City of Temecula's fire protection needs with the utmost professionalism. Finally, the men and women of the Temecula Fire Department wants to formally thank the City Council for all of their support. TEBIECULA CITY FIRE SERVICES Monthly Activity Statistics 2000 YEAR END STATS Emergency Activity Sta. 12 Sra. 73 Sta. 83 Sta. 84 Totals Structure Fires 67 94 42 23 226 Vehicle Fires 43 28 12 12 95 Vegetation Fires 96 61 36 2t 214 Other Fires 50 58 36 30 174 Medical Aids 838 590 454 999 288t Traffic Collisions 216 299 70 126 711 False Alarms 357 390 94 t22 963 Fire Menace Standbys 38 55 18 44 t55 Public Service Assists 61 73 44 93 271 Assists and Covers 118 183 64 149 514 Totals: 1884 t83t 870 t619 6204 Fire Prevention Sta. 12 Sta.73 Sta. 83 Sta. 54 Totals Community Activities 21 7 1 13 42 School Programs 3t 4 3 44 82 Fairs and Displays 6 5 3 3 17 Company Inspections t123 1046 39 70 2278 LE-38 Dooryard Inspections 1492 0 5 130 1627 Fire Investigations 23 0 30 22 75 Buming Permits Issued 127 0 7 35 169 Preplans 135 22 12 28 197 I Totals: 2958 1084 100 345 4487 By: Cad Calderon Form B15-1 (4/99) 0 0 0 LLI Z Inspections And Houm Incurred for 2000 BATTAUON 15 Stat]on 12 Inspections: 1123 Incur~d Hours: 232 Station 7: Inspect]ohs: 1046 Incun~l Hours: 200 Station 83 rnspections: 39 Incuned Hours: 45 Stat]on 84 Inspect]ons: 70 Incurred HourS: 48 All Stations Inspections: 2278 Incurred Hours: 525 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER /'~) TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Jim Domenoe, Chief of Police/'~ V March 27, 2001 Monthly Departmental Report The following report reflects special teams, traffic enforcement and miscellaneous activity occurring during Februaryof 2001. Part One crime statistics are displayed by reporting district within the City, providing stable parameters for monitoring criminal activity, and aiding in planning police resource deployment. The Police Department responded to twenty-eight"priority one" calls for service during the month of February, with an average response time of approximately 6.6 minutes. A total of 1,045 calls for police service were generated in the City of Temecula during the month. During the month of February, the Temecula Police Department's Town Center storefront served a total of 180 customers. Fingerprinting services for this month showed forty-five pdnts taken, twenty- nine people filed police reports, twelve people had citations signed off and four oversized vehicle permits were issued. Crime Prevention Officer Lynn Fanene padicipated in a number of special events and community oriented programs during the month. Officer Fanene facilitated a "Power Outage Awareness" class for neighborhood watch coordinators and block captains at City hall. He also assisted in the planning for the annual Rod Run held during the month and for the "Every 15 Minutes" program. Officer Fanene conducted twenty-three residential security visits and thirty-two business visits during the month. He conducted thirteen visits to businesses for crime follow-up information. Officer Fanene completed his article for the Valley Business Journal titled "Internal Theft Prevention - Part 2 of 2." The POP Team of Officers Jori Anderson and Earl Quinata continued to work on the "Crime Free Multi Housing" project. At this time there is 70% compliance with this program across the City and they are working with two complexes, which are in the final stages of certification. They are also in the process of working to re-certify four complexes that are continuing with the program. The team continued their Old Town corridor program during the month, which resulted in three misdemeanor arrests and six arrests for outstanding warrants. Other programs conducted this month included the planning for future implementation of two new community based programs anticipated to start later this spring. Monthly Departmental Report Page 2 The team continued their Crime Free Parks program and no violations were observed. The T.A.G. program for the month was held with no reportable violations observed. The team also worked the continuing homeless assistance program, which resulted in contacting four subjects who were offered and refused assistance. A meeting was scheduled with a property management company where homeless subjects are congregating and creating a nuisance. This meeting will be held in early March and is expected to resolve the issue. The Old Town Storefront serves as an office for the POP team and a location to assist the public with police services. This has greatly increased their availability to serve the Old Town area. This month the Old Town storefront served 113 customers, fourteen fingerprints were taken, five reports were written and two citations were signed off. The traffic team reported that during the month of February there were 457 citations issued for hazardous violations, 129 citations were issued for non-hazardous violations and 161 parking citations were issued. There were ten injury traffic collisions, forty-eight non-injury collisions were reported and twenty-five drivers were arrested for DUI. The monthly ERAClT program this month led to the arrest of four subjects for DUI. The Neighborhood Enforcement Team (NET) program resulted in twenty-one citations being issued. This program addresses traffic concerns in residential neighborhoods with a dedicated motor officer. The traffic team facilitated the annual Rod Run with crowds estimated at 20,000 per day. This event was held on February 17-18, 2001. The event required the use of the Posse, Reserves, Explorers and station volunteers to maintain public and traffic safety and there were no significant incidents reported. During the month of February, the POP officers assigned to the Promenade Mall handled a total of 144 calls for service (up over 60 % from last month). The predominant number of these calls were for shoplifting investigations. These calls resulted in the criminal arrest and filings on seven misdemeanors and two felony cases for various offenses. Two citations were also issued. Officers Robles and Rupe provided training to mall employees on recognizing counterfeit money. The mall officers are also working with mall merchants on an inkless check system. The officers will be conducting training in March for mall security employees titled "Assisting the Police." The school resource officers continue to remain active in their schools. During the past month, the officers conducted numerous presentations in areas such as "Stranger Danger, Gateway Drugs, Inhalants, Self Defense" and other topics. They also conducted counseling sessions with students. Five arrests were made at Chaparral High school, six arrests were made at Temecula Valley High school and one arrest was made at one of the middle schools. Deputy Kubel planned and facilitated the "Ev,e~trY 15 Minutes" program, which was held at Chaparral High school on February 28th and March 1 . This program was very dramatic and a complete success. It received widespread praise from Chaparral High School staff, students, the local media and the parents involved. The JOLT program (Juvenile Offender Law Enforcement Program) continues to be a success ~n part through its youth court program. Officer Sherry Adams provided training this month to Probation officers assigned to the program regarding "At Risk"juveniles. The JOLT officer assisted at other schools with truancy meetings and follow up with parents of juveniles in the JOLT program. During this month Officer Adams attended the Interagency Council Meeting with regards to providing information on juvenile programs. Additionally, the sixtieth youth court session was held this month. During the month of February, the Special Enforcement Team of Officers Rich Holder and Mark Krikava handled a total of twenty-one cases. These cases resulted in twenty misdemeanor and nine felony arrests, primarily for narcotics violations. They also issued sixteen citations for various Monthly Departmental Report Page 3 violations. This team continues to work street level narcotics and specialty patrol within the city on a . pro-active basis. During this month the team arrested two suspects for possession of stolen credit cards, one suspect for check forgery, and arrested one suspect for possession of methamphetamine for sale. Volunteers from the community continue to be an integral part of the Temecula Police Department's staff. Under the guidance of volunteer coordinator Gayle Gerrish, the Police Department's volunteer staff contributed 625 hours of service in February. Volunteer assignments include computer data input, logistics support, special event assistance (Rod Run and Every 15 Minutes) and telephone answering duties. The reserve officer program and mounted posse are additional valuable volunteer resources available to the police department. The police department utilizes reserve officers to assist with patrol, traffic enforcement, crime prevention, off road vehicle enforcement and a variety of special functions. Reserve police officers worked a total of 279 hours during the month (130 hours were specifically spent on patrol in Temecula). The Reserves were also used for the Rod Run and Every 15 Minutes programs. The posse contributed 202 hours during the month and participated at the Rod Run event. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY "'~)~--~A DIRECTOR OF FINANCE ._ CITY MANAGER ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manage?"~'-¢~ March 27, 2001 Economic Development Monthly Departmental Report Prepared by: Gloda Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator The following are the recent highlights for the Economic Development Department for the month of February 2001. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Leads & Inquiries In the month of February, the City received 4 inquiries and 1 lead. Mayor Comerchero and staff met with a bio-tech firm on February 16th regarding a potential relocation to Temecula. In the month of February, the Southwest Riverside County Alliance responded to 4 leads from the Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP) on behalf of the City of Temecula. The Alliance received 28 leads. Attached is a copy of their activity report that gives a detailed account of the leads. Film Leads & Hi.qhli.qhts In the month of February, the Film Council received 21 phone calls regarding the Film Festival and 35 calls regarding locations information requests. Please refer to the attached Film Council report for additional activities. Major Studio Contacts The Film Council coordinated with CPI Corporation from Toronto as they filmed in wine country and Old Town with an on-camera interview with Councilman Jeff Stone. This film will be shown as part of GPI's television show "Distant Roads" which is directed at RV travelers and will be shown on the KPXN (PAX) cable network. Media/Outreach Materials Staff wrote an article for the Chamber of Commerce monthly newsletter titled "City of Temecula and the Chamber of Commerce Addresses Energy Crisis." The article provided an update as to what the City and Chamber are doing to address the energy crisis. The article also provided information on assistance programs that are available for businesses and residents as well as tips on energy conservation. The Welcome To Temecula Valley And Surrounding Areas {Newcomer & Relocation Guide) is completed. The guide is pdnted bi-annually and 40,000 units are pdnted annually. The publication is published by Heritage Media and has received an overwhelming response. The City supported this publication by placing a full-page ad which is located on the inside cover. Staff also provided information, photos, text, etc. Distribution includes: Chambers of Commerces, the EDCSWRC, Economic Alliance, City of Temecula, Real Estate Offices and Board of Realtors, Promenade Mall customer service desk, Winegrowers Association, human resource departments (Guidant), and hardbound copies can be found in the rooms at Embassy Suites. The official website for the guide is up and running: www. relocation.quides.com Users can navigate through the guide to chapters that interest them. Copies will be forwarded to members of the Council and Department Directors at City Hall. Reception City Councilmembers, Shawn Nelson and Jim O'Grady attended the Rancho Springs Medical Center VIP Reception on February 15~. The event was held in tribute of the merger of the Rancho Spdngs and Inland Valley Medical Centers~ Meetings Staff attended the Inland Empire Economic Partnership Community Partner's Meeting on February 1~t. Lee Harrington with the Los Angeles Economic Development Corporation gave a presentation on their "60-mile Circle" study. Components of the study includes: Southern California's Infrastructure, Land Use, and Workforce Implications of a Growing Southern California Economy. The IEEP provided an update on their leads, trade show activity and marketing program. There was also discussion on the California energy situation. Staff attended the Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Business Relations Committee Meeting on February 1st. Company contact and follow-up action reports were given. Committee members were assigned company visits for the following month. Staff continues to meet with representatives of Scott's regarding their facility. Scott's is continuing to work towards a July opening. Staff attended The Murrieta Temecula Group Meeting on February 2nd. There was a presentation given on the future recreation plans at Diamond Valley Reservoir. On February 7t~, staff attended the Chamber of Commerce Education Committee Meeting. The upcoming Chamber Student Career Fair, scheduled for May 19t~ at the Promenade Mall, was discussed and planned. The Career Fair will be put on in cooperation with the Riverside County Economic Development Agency and the Temecula Valley School District. Staff attended The Inland Empire Economic Partnership Board of Directors Meeting, held on February 8th. Lee Harrington of the Los Angeles Economic Development Corporation presented the "60-mile Circle Study" to the IEEP Board. This presentation was also given at the Community Partners Meeting. Committee reports were given as well as an update by Teri Ooms on the IEEP activities. Staff attended the Temecula CONNECT Meeting on February 9~. Diane West, President of 2Connect, spoke on the topic, "Communicating Your Business Plan Effectively." 2Connect is a firm that specializes in presentation coaching and training, and collects data from investors and venture capitalists on investor presentations. On February 8th, staff visited the City of Brea and took a tour of a development in Brea to review redevelopment projects in downtown Brea. On February 13t~, staff attended a planning meeting for the upcoming Career & Manufacturing Expo. The Expo will be held at Chaparral High School on 21st. Sponsors to date include Guidant Corporation, The Press-Enterprise, EDCSWRC, Cities of Temecula and Murrieta, and the Southwest Riverside County Manufacturers' Council. The Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance Regional Broker Breakfast was held on February 14th at Temecula Creek Inn. Temecula, Murrieta, and Lake Elsinore gave updates on their cities and the Alliance gave a presentation on their organization and marketing activities. The event was well attended by area commercial brokers and other Broker Breakfasts will be planned for the future. Staff attended the Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Quarterly Luncheon on February 15~ at the Lake Elsinore Cultural Center. The program topic was "Higher Education in Southwest Riverside County" and featured speakers included: Dr. Richard Giese, Mt. San Jacinto Community College, Dr. Pat Worden, California State University, San Marces and Jack Azzaretto, University of Califomia, Riverside. Staff met several times with representatives of various automobile-related uses on the City's property at 27500 Jefferson as well as other sites. Staff attended the Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance Meeting on February 22ha. Discussion items included the Labor Market RFP/Grant, budget, local outreach, Silicon Valley consu tant, and advertising n Forbes magazine. The Alliance reported on the Nepcon West Trade Show they attended on February 27th - March 1~t. The All ance will be attend ng Westec 2001 on March 26 - 29~. On February 22"a, staff addressed the Western Regional Science Association at Pala Mesa and discussed Economic Development and Growth issues in Temecula. Staff attended the Southwest Riverside County Manufacturers' Council General Membership Meeting on February 23"~ at the Hemet Workforce Development Center. Wayne Sutter with Mt. San Jacinto Community College gave an overview of the Tech Center, spoke of the future planning of the facility and held a small graduation ceremony for a few of the graduates of the Tech Center. Attendees were able to tour the Access Manufacturing Training Facility. An internal city department meeting was held on February 27th to discuss the Economic Development website and ways that the GIS component can further enhance the site. Further research will be done and presented at a future meeting. TOURISM Trade Show Staff coordinated with the San Diego Convention & Visitors Bureau regarding exhibiting at the Los Angeles Times Travel Show March 3 - 4. Staff met with Chamber on February 14th to coordinate the staffing and set up of the Temecula area. Medial Outreach Materials Staff provided a press kit, Balloon & Wine Festival information and slides to Kirsten Culbertson (New Media) of the LA Times. Temecula will be featured in an upcoming LA Times special section in April. Staff provided slides, press kit and other tourism related information to Natasha Babaian of Insight Guide: Southern California. She works out of London. Insight Guides is publishing a Southern California publication, which will be published for distribution around the wodd in a multitude of languages. Temecula will be featured in this publication. Staff was contacted in February by Char White with Gray Line Tours in Tucson, AZ. They would like to actively promote Temecula as one of their destination tours. Staff provided them with the "Eye on LA" video and slides of our area to include in their presentations as they market their Gray Line Tours to prospective groups. Meetings Staff attended the Chamber Tourism Committee Meeting on February 1't at Vail Lake Resort. Staff reported on the City's marketing activities. Staff met with staff from the Temecula Museum and members of the Chamber toudsm committee regarding incorporating the Old Town Walking Tour Map in the Chamber's Visitor Guide. This will be more economical and will be distributed on a broader scale. ATTACHMENTS Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Activities Report Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Activities Report Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance Activities Report Temecula Valley Film Council Activities Report 27450 Ynez Road, Suite 124 Temecula, CA 92591 Phone (909) 676-5090 · Fax (909) 694-0201 March 9, 2001 Shawn Nelson, City Manager City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Dear Shawn, Attached please find the Monthly Activity R~port provided as per our contract with the City of Temecula. This is the month of February at a glance: Business Inquiry Highlights: In the month of February, 14 businesses requested information on starting or relocating their business in Temecula. They received a business packet, which includes a copy of the City of Temecula demographics, relocation, housing, rentals, maps, organizations, etc. Committee Highlights: Tourism & Visitors Council: Committee representatives received a great response promoting the City of Temecula at the Los Angeles T~mes Travel Show on March 3rd & 4th' at the Long Beach Convention Center. Leads obtained from tour operators and press at the Los Angeles Times Travel Show, Orange County Register Show and the California Travel Market will be used to promote upcoming Temecuta FAM Tours. Positive surveys were received from businesses and visitors at the Temecula Valley Rod Run. A copy of the survey overview is enclosed in the packet. The City of Temecula street map is being distributed throughout the Temecula Valley. Over 300 new street names were added to the map this year. Education Committee: The Youth Job Fair is scheduled for Mav 19, 2001 at The Promenade in Temecula. The job fair is co-sponsored with Thc Promenade in ~'emccula, EDD, and Worktbrce Development Center's }lire-A-Youth Program. Workshops will be held prior to the job fair and will cover job applications, resumes, job dialogue, dress attire, and job resources. The workshops will be held at Chaparral and Temecula Valley tligh Schools. ROP will assist with the training of l the students, and career representatives from the school districts will be involved to disseminate information and flyers. Preparation tbr the scholarship process will be discussed at the next education committee meeting. Ways & Means Committee: The February 17, 2001 Installation Banquet and Awards Ceremony was a success with 520 guests present. Board of Directors were installed and 2000 Chairperson, were recognized. In addition, Sterling Business of the Year w*s awarded to A Grape Escape ' Balloon Adventure. Gold Business was awarded to Rancon Real Estate. ABC Child Care Center won Platinum Business of the Year. Grace Mellman received the Lifetime Achievement Award for her continuous devotion to the community. Timmy Daniels walked away with two prestigious awards; Citizen of the Year and Ambassador of the Year. State of the City will be held on Thursday, March 29, 2001 at the Edwards Cinema at the Promenade Mall with 350 guest§ in attendance. The 2001 Golf Tournament is scheduled for May 4~ at Temecula Creek Inn. Local Business Promotions Committee: Temecula Valley Council PTA was selected as the March business for "Chamber Spotlight" program that Froggy 92.9 sponsors. Simply Kneaded was the winner for the Mystery Shopper Program in March receiving a perfect score after the Mystery Shopper paid them a visit. March Businesses of the Month selected by the Ways & Means Committee were Davis Family Insurance and Voit Management. Shop Temecula First Campaign flyers will be circulated in'the March, April, and May newsletter. The Success Seminar Series is under consideration to be eliminated and replaced with another program that would be more profitable. ' Government Action Committee: A resolution was made by the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce urging immediate intervention by the Federal government and State government to reform the California electric energy marketplace. The resolution was sent to Senator Boxer, Senator Feinstein, Congressman lssa, Congressman Calvert, Assemblyman Hollingsworth and Supervisor Buster. The City of Temecula published an article in the March issue of the Temecula Today! Newsletter informing members of the energy er/sis and how Conservation Makes a Difference. Membership Committee: Chamber staffand Ambassadors attended 10 Ribbon Cuttings in the month of February. A very successful Mixer was held at Morgan Stanley Dean Witter on February 21, 2001 with over 250 guests in attendance. On February 2, 200l the newly implemented Round-Table Meetings proved to be very successful with 40 guests in attendance. The objective is to educate members with solutions to common problems faced in the day-to-day operation of their business. Members of the specific topic were invited to attend and provided intbrmative information. February 28,200l, 80 business owners attended the Ambassador Networking Breakfast. · Tourism Highlights (Bulk brochure distribution) · 300 Temecula Brochures, 200 Visitor Guides and 165 Winery Brochures to .the Temecula Town Association for distribgtion to Rod Run participants. · 21)0 Winery Brochures and 225 Visitor Guides to TVCC's Weekend Visitor Center. · 100 Temecula Brochures. 100 Visitor Guides and 100 Winery Brochures to Temecula Creek Inn lbr distribution to guests. · 60 Temecula Brochures, 10 Visitor Guides and 10 Relocation Packets to Only You Realty Inr distribution to clients. · 50 Visitor Guides, 50 Winery Brochures and 50 Promenade Mall Brochures to Warner Springs Ranch tbr distribution'to guests. · 30 Temecula Brochures, 30 Visitor Guides, 30 Winery Brochures, 30 Prime Outlets Lake Elsinore and 20 School Brochures to Realty World for distribution to clients. · 30 Temecula Brochures, 30 Visitor Guides and 30 Winery Brochures to American Coach Association for distribution to clients visiting Temecula. · 16 Visitor Guides and 12 Pechanga Entertainment Brochures to Monaco Romers RV Club for distribution to clients visiting Temecula. · 15 Relocation Guides and 15 City Reference Guides to Acropolis Engineering for distribution to employees relocating to Temecula. · 10 Visitor Guides and 10 Calendar of Events to the National Automobile Club for distribution in their tourism department. · 10 Visitor Guides and 10 Winery Brochures to ReMax United for distribution to clients visiting Temecula. Activity Report: Total Tourism calls were 1,858 in February. · Total Phone calls were 3,617 in February. · Total Walk-ins were up 9.96 percent in February. · Mailings were up 11.80 pement in February. · E-mail requests were up 9.15 pement in February. Also attached are the meeting minutes for the Tourism and Visitors Council, Education, Ways & Means, Membership Committee, Local Business Promotions, Government Actions, Temecula Rod Run Business & Visitor's Survey Response Overview and a March issue of Temecula Today! If you have any questions regarding this information, please feel free to call me. Thank you. Sincerely, CC: Mayor Jeff Comerchero Mayor Pro Tern Ron Roberts Councilman Jeff Stone Councilman Sam pratt Councilman Mike Naggar Shawn Nelson, City Manager Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager Gary Thomhill. Deputy City Manager Gloria Wolnick. Marketing Coordinator TVCC Board of Directors TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR FEBRUARY, 2001 PHONE CALLS TOURISM TOURISM REFERRALS Calendar of Events Special Events General Information TOTAL TOURISM CALLS RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS CHAMBER MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL PHONE CALLS * CHAMBER REFERRALS WALK-INS TOURISM CALENDAR OF EVENTS SPECIAL EVENTS GENERAL INFORMATION RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS CHAMBER MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL WALK-INS MAILINGS TOURISM RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS TOTAL MAILINGS E-MAIL TOURISM RELOCATION MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL E-MAIL WEB PAGE USER SESSIONS GRAND TOTALS PHONE CALLS WALK-INS MAILINGS E-MAIL CHAMBER REFERRALS Chamber Vis. Center This Month This Month 321 190 328 1,019 1,858 201 70 1,315 173 3,617 N/A 268 141 95 906 194 65 794 147' 2,610 110 129 102 341 41 39 75 155 N/A 90 9 10 212 4 1 1 10 337 THIS MONTH 3,617 2,947 341 155 N/A Total Year-To-Date 655 342 691 2,249 3,937 382 138 2,810 364 7,631 N/A 800 300 171 2,230 404 138 1,728 310 6,081 243 273 207 723 96 88 176 360 N/A YEAR-TO.DATE 7,631 6,081 723 360 ANNUAL VOLUME COMPARISONS Chamber Chamber February, 2000 February, 2001 PHONE CALLS TOURISM Toudsm Referrals 399 321 Calendar of Events 104 190 Special Events 555 328 General Information 1,187 1,019 TOTAL TOURISM CALLS 2,245 1,858 RELOCATION 106 201 DEMOGRAPHICS 54 70 CHAMBER 2,024 1,315 MISCELLANEOUS 187 173 TOTAL PHONE CALLS 4,616 3,617 CHAMBER REFERRALS N/A N/A Percentage Increase -19.55 82.69 -40.90 -14.15 -17.24 89.62 29.63 -35.03 -7.49 -21.64 N/A WALK-INS TOURISM 190 268 41.05 CALENDAR OF EVENTS 156 141 -9.62 SPECIAL EVENTS 83 95 14.46 GENERAL INFORMATION 637 906 42.23 RELOCATION 144 194 34.72 DEMOGRAPHICS 140 65 -53.57 CHAMBER 973 794 -18.40 MISCELLANEOUS 91 147 61.54 VISITOR CENTER WALK-INS 266' 337 26.69 TOTAL WALK-INS 2,680 2,947 9.96 MAILINGS TOURISM 117 110 -5.98 · RELOCATION 94 129 37.23 DEMOGRAPHICS 94 102 8.51 TOTAL MAILINGS 305 341 11.80 E-MAIL TOURISM 33 41 24.24 RELOCATION 30 39 30.00 MISCELLANEOUS 79 75 -5.06 TOTAL E-MAIL 142 155 9.15 * Chamber referrals reflects faxes, walk-ins and phone calls Temecula Rod Run February 17 & 18, 2001 Business & Visitor's Survey Response l 2 businesses filled out and returned the survey. I 1 businesses were pleased with the event. 2 hotel/motels felt their business increased, 3 felt business remained the same. 3 restaurants felt business increased, 3 restaurants felts business remained the same. 6 businesses felt their business increased before and after the event. 4 businesses felt their business did not increase before and after the event. 12 businesses felt the event should be continued. 3 businesses were satisfied with the advertising, 1 business felt there should be more advertising and 4 businesses felt it increased awareness of Wine Country. Suggestions for improvement of the event: More attractions for children Band and evening activities Rod Run Golf Tournament with a hole-in-one, prizes that consist of hot rods and a Rod Run Wine Tasting at wineries Improve parking Increase awareness of Wine Country to include wine tours Temecula Valley Rod Run Visitor Survey Response 2 visitor's filled out and returned the survey. I visttor had visited the area m the past. I visitor stayed l night at a hotel/motel and 1 visitor was camping. I visitor had plans of visiting Old Town and return to golf and visit winerles. I visaor had plans of visiting Old Town, wineries and golfing. I vis,tot liked the people, weather, and the views. I vis~tor t'elt there are to many "no turn' signs. Suggestion to increase visitors to complete the survey: Encourage visitors to complete survey by receiving a flee event poster March 8, 2001 Jim O'Grady City of Temecula PO Box 9033 Temecala, CA 92590 RE: Activity Summary - February 2001 Activities of the EDC for the month of February were as follows: Business Development Staff received one business development leads for the month of February. A phone inquiry from Meg Dave at North County Times for demographic information for the cities of Lake Elsinore, Murrieta, and Temecula. Staff emailed direct links to the respective website pages for demographic information. Marketing Outreach Staff attended the following meetings/events: · February 2, 2001 - SWRC Manufacturers' Council Meeting - Staff attended a planning meeting for the Council's upcoming quarterly luncheon on February 23. · February 8, 2001 - Lake EIsinore Valley Connections EDC Lunch - Staff attended the quarterly luncheon hosted by Lake Elsinore Chamber/Connections EDC at the Cultural Center in Lake Elsinore. Representatives presented the Lake Elsinore Sports & EnteRamment Center, a proposed 795-acre regional facility incorporating a resort hotel and golf course, town homes, amphitheater, raceway, commercial center, and open space. · February 9, 2001 - Temecula CONNECT Links Lunch - Staff attended the monthly lunch at Temecula Council Chambers. "Communicafmg Your Plan Effectively" was presented by keynote speaker Diane West of 2Coanect, a firm specializing in presentation training and coaching. · February 14, 2001 - Economic Alliance Brokers' Breakfast - Staff attended a brokers' breakfast hosted by the SWRC Economic Alliance. Updates were provided on regional marketing efforts for business attraction and various development projects in SW Riverside County. · February 14, 2001 - SWRC Manufacturers' Council Meeting - Staff attended the general Board of Directors meeting ofthe Manufacturers' Cooncil at Guidant Corp. Staffserves as an honorary board member. · February 14, 2001 - EDC Quarterly Membership Luncheon - "Higher Education in Southwest Riverside County" was presented by keynote speakers Dr. Richard Geise, president of Mt. San Jacinto College; Dr. Pat Worden, vice president of Academic Affairs, CSU San Marcos; and Associate Dean Sheldon Lisker of UCR Extension. · February 22, 2001 - All-Staff Meeting at Riverside Workforce Development Center - Staffwas an invited guest speaker at the monthly all-staff meeting of the Riverside Workforce Development Center. Staffpresented EDC activities and resource assistance, along with other partners of the Indio, Hemet, and Riverside WDCs. Jim O'Grady City of Temecula Activity Summary - February 2001 Page 2 of 2 February 23, 2001 - SWRC Manufacturers' Council Luncheon - Staff attended the first Manufacturers' Council quarterly luncheon at the Hemet Workforee Development Center. Wayne SuRer, project manager of the Manufacturers' Training Center, provided a tour of the training facility and an overview of th9 training curriculuRl. Business Relations · February 1, 2001 - Staff aRended the EDC Business Relations Comnuttee Meeting. (See meeting minutes for details.) Administration/Organization · February 13, 2001 - SWRC Career & Manufacturers' Expo Meeting - Staff attended a planning meeting with the Career Expo Committee to discuss details of the upcoming Southwest Riverside County Career & Manufacturers' Expo scheduled for April 21, 2001 at Chaparral High School in Temeeula. · February 22, 2001 - EI)C Board of Directors Meeting held in the Workforce Development Center in Temecula. (See meeting minutes for details.) · February 27, 2001 - Workforce l)evelopment Center All-Staff Meeting was held at the Temecula Center. Topics included mutual issues and interests relative to each agency in the Center. · February 27, 2001 - Workforee l)evelopment Center Safety Team Meeting - Staff is a team member for the Temeeula WDC Safety Team. Policies and protocol for workplace violence were discussed. · Administration - During the month of February, staff managed the daily operations of the EDC office, coordinated details for the quarterly luncheon held on February 15, helped plan for the SWRC Manufacturers' Council luncheon held on February 23, facilitated ongoing meetings for the upcoming Career & Manufacturers' Expo scheduled for April 21, made one in-person delivery of a membership package to Foothill Independent Bank, mailed 35 membership solicitation letters to Mumeta businesses, and attended two evening marketing classes at UC Riverside Extension in Riverside. Class began on January 11 and finished in mid-February. A marketing plan will be produced for the EDC organizataon. This concludes the activity summary for February 2001. Should you have questions or need further detail, please call me at 600-6064. Diane Sessions EDC of Southwest Riverside County ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOARD OF DIRECTORS GENERAL MEETING Thursday, February 22, 2001 - 9:00 a.m.. Workforee Development Center 27447 Enterprise Circle West, Temecula, CA BOARD MEMBERS Marlene Best, City of Lake Elsinore Mike Doblado, The Promenade Mall Dennis Frank, UCR Extension Darren Gill, D&D Construction Fred Grimes, Westmar Commercial Brokerage, Inc. Ted Hating, Eastern Municipal Water District Ron Holliday, City of Murdeta Jim King, The Gas Company Dick Kurtz, CDM Group, Inc. Lori Moss, City of Murrieta A1 Sabsevitz, Verizon Gary Youmans, Community National Bank EDC STAFF Diane Sessions MEMBERS AND GUESTS Stevie Hirdler, SWRC Economic Alliance Grant Yates, City of Temecula CALL TO ORDER · President Gary Youmans called the meeting to order at 9:05 a.m. MINUTES · Motion was made by Fred Grimes, seconded by Al Sabsevitz and carded unanimously to approve the minutes of the January 25, 2001 Board of Directors Meeting as presented. FINANCIAL REPORT · The Board reviewed the January 31, 2001 Financial Report that showed a total monthly income of $1,278.90, total expenses of $6,909.22. with total cash-in-bank of $82,821.64. Diane Sessions reported a mid-year budget review was performed to make adjustments to budget deficits in the two expense categories. Budgeted funds of $6,000 from the Consulting Fees-General expense category were reallocated to Website expenses and to Training/Workshop expenses. Funds were reallocated to cover approved website redesign costs and staff education courses. Motion was made by Dennis Frank, seconded by Dick Kurtz and carded unanimously to approve the January 31, 2001 Financial Report as presented. · Quarterly Lunch Reconciliation - The Board reviewed the reconciliation report for the Februaxy 15, 2001 quarterly lunch, which showed an excess of revenues over expenses of $182.87. NEW BUSINESSS · Referendum Against Wolf Creek Project / Petition and Protest Against Development in Temecula - Dennis Frank reported an organized group of Temecula citizens wished to stop development of the approved Wolf Creek Project in Temecula through a referendum campaign. The group had sought to gather enough signatures to place the initiative on the ballot. The Board discussed the implications and impact of a no- growth referendum initiative. Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Board of Directors Meeting- February 22, 2001 Minutes - Page 2 of 4 Mr. Frank asked the EDC Board to oppose the referendum. After much discussion, the Board agreed the organization's mission was in accord with supporting the community's economic vitality. The Board further agreed the EDC should maintain a consistent message to oppose no-growth moratoriums that were counterproductive to community members' quality of life. Motion was made by Jim King, seconded by Dick Kurtz and carried to oppose no-growth moratorium campaigns effecting the Wolf Creek Project, and to adopt a resolution that supports the positive issues of the Wolf Creek project. Rob Moran abstained. · City of Murdeta-Overall Economic Development Funds - Lori Moss reported the City of Murrieta applied for HUD Overall Economic Development Funds through Riverside County for infrastructure projects. Funds would be used for sewer connections for the Washington Street project and Old Town Business District, with a phase that would provide sewer connections to affordable-income houses now using septic systems. The project would provide existing businesses with much needed infrastructure and financial assistance for the expensive hook up fees. Ms. Moss asked the EDC Board to support business retention in the downtown area with the needed infrastructure, which would ultimately encourage new business development and job creation. She asked the Board to submit a recommendation letter to Riverside County EDA that would endorse the City's sewer project. The Board agreed such business retention projects within the cities of Murrieta, Lake Elsinore and Temecula were well supported. Motion was made by Gary Youmans, seconded by Michael Lewin and carried to endorse the City of Murdeta's sewer infrastructure project using Overall Economic Development Funds and to submit a recommendation letter to Riverside County EDA. Loft Moss abstained. · North County EDC - Gary Youmans stated Mary Regan of North County EDC invited him to participate in a meeting with delegates of San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG), and several San Diego EDC's to discuss commuter/transportation issues. He would provide further details as they occurred. · Appoint Budget Committee - Gary Youmans asked that volunteers who would like to serve on the Budget Committee confirm with Diane Sessions. Ron Holliday volunteered to serve. · Board Meeting Schedule - Gary Youmans reported the recent change in board meeting dates was to accommodate directors whose other board commitments conflicted with EDC board meetings. Since the other commitments were no longer applicable, the Board agreed to revert to the original meeting schedule on the third Thursday of each month. CONTINUING BUSINESS · Murrieta Chamber Proposal to Request County Redistricting: Ron Holliday reported the Chamber would reconvene soon to continue their discussion on county redistricting. Mr. Holliday would provide further details at the next EDC board meeting. · Manufacturers' Career Fair Update - Diane Sessions reported plans were moving forward and corporate sponsors were solicited. · Resolution to Support the City of Murdeta on the Proposed Multi-Species Habitat Plan - In Lori Moss's absence, Diane Sessions reported the City Council had not yet drafted their resolution to oppose the proposed habitat conservation sites in Murdeta identified under RCIP. The Board took action on January 25, 2001 to adopt a resolution to support the City of Murdeta. Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Board of Directors Meeting - February 22, 2001 Minutes - Page 3 of 4 Motion was made by Ron Holliday, seconded by Dennis Frank and carded unanimously to authorize Diane Sessions to draft a resolution and submit it to Lori Moss. Newsletter Update: Diane Sessions reported the newsletter would be mailed next week. Golf Tournament Update - Gary Youmans reported he secured several major sponsors for the golf tournament and would be creating the flyer and sponsor letters. OPEN DISCUSSION · EDC Administrative Update: The Board reviewed the January 2001 Monthly Activity Report submitted by Diane Sessions. Gary Youmans suggested the Board provide feedback on speaker topics for upcoming EDC luncheons, such as tourism and sewer/water issues. · City, County and Chamber Updates: City of Temecula - Grant Yates reported the City of Temecula partnered with SANDAG, WRCOG, and other agencies to begin interregional planning to address common growth-related issues. Mr. Yates stated the California Department of Housing and Community Development (}lCD) had $4 million in State Interregional Partnership grant funds to study the effects of interregional employment and housing imbalances. Grant funds would be used to analyze the impacts of job and housing imbalances and develop mitigation policies. Mr. Yates further reported the grant required the lead agency to submit letters of recommendation from non-governmental agencies. He asked the Board to endorse the project and write a letter of recommendation that SANDAG serve as the lead agency. Motion was made by Fred Grimes, seconded by Gary Youmans and carded unanimously to adopt a resolution to endorse SANDAG as the lead agency for the State Interregional Partnership Grant and submit a letter of recommendation to HCD for project funding. City of Murrieta - Ron Holliday reported the City Council complied with an environmental group's request to postpone adoption of the Murrieta Creek Project until further studies could be completed. Mr. Holliday asked board members to attend the next meeting on March 27 and speak in favor of Plan #6 of the Murrieta Creek Project. Mr. Holliday further reported the lgfid~ process was ongoing for the Jefferson Avenue improvements. City of Lake Elsinore - Marlene Best reported the Davcon project was moving forward, with two businesses close to escrow, and funds were being sought to pay for needed infrastructure in the industrial park; the outflow channel project was in process; Lake Elsinore Chamber/EDC Connections lunch would be on March 8 and would address the power crisis; Caltrans denied every alternative to the Railroad Canyon Road/I-15 interchange; Canyon Hills development would break ground soon; Vertigo, an R&D aerospace company, was looking for approximately 100' x 150' of clear space to build a prototype product; the Chamber mixer was this evening; and Mission Trial improvements would break ground soon. Countg of Riverside EDA - Rob Moran reported the Department of Commerce offered HUD funding to cities/counties for projects such as the one applied for by the City ofMurrieta. SWRC Economic Alliance - Stevie Hirdler reported the marketing CD- ROM was moving forward; the Alliance would conduct a laborforce/commuter survey soon; and a brokers' breakfast would be held quarterly. Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce - Mike Doblado reported the Board would support opposition of the Wolf Creek Project referendum. Economic Development Corporation' of Southwest Riverside County Board of Directors Meeting - February 22, 2001 Minutes - Page 4 of 4 · SWRC Manufacturers' Council - Dennis Frank reported the Council would consider a partnership with UCR to help develop a research center. The Council's first quarterly lunch for 2001 was scheduled for February 23 at the Workforce Development Center in Hemet. EDC Business Relations Committee Update - Gary Youmans reported that visits to local businesses were on track, with phone interviews slightly behind schedule. The Committee would assist the Alliance by calling on businesses in medical, biomedical, biochemistry, and telecommunication industries. ADJOURNMENT · The Board adjourned the meeting at 10:25 a.m. Respectively submitted by: Diane Sessions Phil Oberhansley Recording Secretary Board Secretary ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY BUSINESS RELATIONS COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday, February 1, 2001 - 9:00 a.m. Workforce Development Center, Executive Board Room 27447 Enterprise Circle West, Temecula, CA Committee Members Present: Dennis Frank, UCR Stevie Hirdler, SWRC Economic Alliance Michael Lewin, Mirau, Edwards, Cannon, Hatter & Lewin Jim O'Grady, City of Temecula Mark O'Connor, Lee & Associates Bonnie Renz-Hanna, Diversified, The Staffing Solution David Rosenthal, SWRC Manufacturers' Council Alice Sullivan, Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce G~ommu~t National Bank Also In Attendance: Diane Sessions, EDC Staff Call To Order · Committee Chair Michael Lewin called the meeting to order at 9:06 a.m. Welcome · Michael Lewin welcomed the Committee and thanked all for attending. Follow-up Action Reports · Waterfall Oasis - Diane Sessions reported that Lori Moss would follow up with the owner to refer Foamworks and Totally Themed in Lake Elsinore as possible vendor sources. She further reported that Totally Themed was a division of Totally Wired and made decorative figures for theme parks such as Disneyland. Company Contact Reports · Paulson Manufacturing - Michael Lewin reported a phone interview with Owner Roy Paulson of Paulson Manufacturing in Rainbow Canyon. The company was founded by the owner's father in 1947 afld manufacturers eye protection goggles and full-length welders' face shields. Edison is a client, with other primary customers on the East Coast. Paulson also produces eye wear for competitors who place their name labels on the products. The owner indicated there were recent employee layoffs due to slow down of supply demand. The company typically employs approximately 100 that includes about 50 temporary workers. Two-thirds of the employees live locally and the remaining live in Fallbrook. The owner is interested in employee training programs. Lisa Garcia-Gleissner to provide training information. Mr. Lewin further reported the owner's primary suppliers were located in the Bay Area. Many found it increasingly difficult to do business in the area because of high expenses and lack of space. Mr. Lewin suggested he meet with Mr. Paulson to discuss ways that could assist the Alliance with business attraction in the Bay Area. The owner's primary concern was the effects of the current power crisis. Business Relations Committee Meeting Minutes - February 1, 2001 Page 2 of 3 Michael Lewin announced that visits in the seventh month of the fiscal year were slightly behind and phone interviews were falling behind as follows: YTD. VISIT PHONE Actual 13 12 Goal 15 21 Annual Goal: 27 visits ~ 3 points each + 33 phone interviews ~ l points each = 60 visits/calls G114 points YTI) VISIT PHONE POINTS. Actual 13 12 51 Goal 27 33 114 Variance -14 -21 -63 New Committee Assignments Point persons assigned for February 2001 were Keith Johnson, Gary Youmans, and Bonnie Hanna volunteered as the third point. Mr. Johnson received green binder//3. Ms. Hanna received green binder//4. Mr. Youmans received blue binder #5. Michael Lewin returned blue binder//2. Strategic Visits - Adex Medical - Mr. Youmans; Laser Power Corporation - Mr. Johnson; Nascal Interplex - Ms. Hanna. Stevie Hirdler provided a list of company names identified as local manufacturers of medical supplies or medical-related products, telecommunications and high-tech businesses. The Committee agreed to assist the Economic Alliance's marketing efforts by visiting the identified companies. The survey was reviewed for content changes that would adapt to the Alliance's business attraction campaign. Committee members volunteered to make additional visits to Opto 22 and Plant Equipment. David Rosenthal suggested that Bob Larson would make an excellent resource for outreach efforts. EDC/City/County News and Information · EDC Board Update - Gary Youmans reported the EDC luncheon would discuss higher education opportunities in Southwest Riverside County; the newsletter was in production; and the golf tournament would be held on Monday, June 11, 2001 at Temecula Creek Inn. · City, County & Chamber Updates - City of Temecula - Jim O'Grady reported the Planning Commission approved plans for a retail development on Highway 79; an energy, workshop was scheduled for February 6 at 7:00 p.m. in the Temecula Council Chambers that would include discussions of community conservation efforts, the proposed SDG&E transmission lines, and could include discussion of a possible municipal energy plant; results of the City Services Survey showed that 53% of the respondents indicated they worked locally, which was a 20% increase from Business Relations Committee Meeting Minutes - February 1, 2001 Page 3 of 3 the survey conducted three years ago; and survey results would be placed on the City web site. City of Lake Elsinore - No report available. City of Murrieta -No report available. Riverside County EDA - Stevie Hirdler reported the Date Fair in Indio would be held on February 16 - 25. Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce - Alice Sullivan reported the Installation Dinner had 500 reserved guests to date and would be held on February 17 at Pechanga Entertainment Center; the State of the City was scheduled for March 29 in the Edwards Cinema at The Promenade Mall; plans to hold a youth career fair at The Promenade Mall was pending a date; and the Chamber golf tournament was scheduled for May 4 at Temecula Creek Inn. Murrieta Valley Chamber of Commerce - No report available. SWRC Manufacturers' Council - David Rosenthal reported the board elections were recently completed; the Council was an exhibitor at the B2B Technology Expo; the first Council luncheon for 2001 was scheduled for Friday, February 23 at the Hemet Workforce Development Center; the Manufacturers' & Career Fair Expo was scheduled for Saturday, April 21 at Chaparral High School in Temecula; and Mr. Rosenthal would meet with the president of the Corona Manufacturers' Council to discuss similar issues. Dennis Frank announced that T Sector Magazine would print an article on high-tech businesses in the region. SWRC Ecoaomic Alliance - Stevie Hirdler reported the marketing CD-ROM project was moving forward; a brokers' breakfast was scheduled for February 14 at 8:30 a.m. at Temecula Creek Inn; and a labor force survey was in process. The meeting adjourned at 10:0.0 a.m. TO: ECO NGMIC ALLIANCE FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Madene Best Assistant City Manager City of Lake Elsinore Jim O'Grady Assistant City Manager City of Temecula Lod Moss Assistant City Manager City of Murrieta Stevie Hirdler Marketing Coordinator March 1, 2001 SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY MONTHLY MARKETING upDATE Dear Partners: Please consider this an update on the marketing activities for the Alliance as required in the Southwest Riverside County Marketing for Business Attraction Agreement. Leads: The Alliance had 28 leads in February. On Tuesday, I was contacted by a business owner who received our information a few months ago, however, after speaking to him, he wanted to hold off the possible expansion to SWRC. He says he is now ready to proceed. He is interested in a small location in Temecula. I will provide an update to the partners as this develops. I spoke with Kevin Nellis, who is the broker working with the golf shaft manufacturer in San Diego County. He stated that the prospective business is still considering SWRC and he will keep me posted. Eighty- eight calls and/or attempts were made to follow-up on recent and past leads. IEEP It was decided at our meeting on February 22, that we would place a 1/3-page profile ad in Forbes magazine. The discounted rate for this is $15, 329. As agreed, I will have the ad layout formatted and submit to Forbes, rather than have Forbes create an ad for us. I spoke with Jim Godey, and he mentioned that Ted would write the editorial and would try to place it next to our ad. I will contact Ted and ask if we can write this ourselves. If not, I will make sure she is supplied with approved information that she can incorporate in her copy. Labor Force Survey/RFP Jim has submitted the draft copy of the Labor Force Study RFP, as well as copies of the 1997 commuter studies from Murdeta and Temecula to WRCOG and SANDAG. Jim mentioned to the WRCOG/SANDAG staff that he would like to see the SWRC Economic Alliance RFP in the grant proposal, as well as include areas of San Diego County along the 1- 15 that they felt would be appropriate. The grant application is due on March 12 and they will know a short time later whether the grant is approved. Consulting The idea of retaining a consultant to assist the Alliance with establishing Venture Capital in SWRC is still being considered. Itwas agreed at our February meeting that we would invite Ron Nater to our March Alliance meeting, for the purpose of discussing his ideas, our ideas and time for questions. I will provide a full report of this meeting on Apdl's monthly update. CD-ROM Cutting Edge has provided me with the copy for the CD-ROM cover and content. I will fax it to each Partner on Monday and request that each Partner provide me with his/her comments no later than Wednesday, March 7. Please note that this is not copy for the scdpt. We will not receive that until later. There are some remaining questions, such as pictures, testimonials, etc., which we will discuss at our next regular meeting. Trade Shows I recently attended the Business to Business Expo. Twenty-one leads were generated and packets have been mailed out. On February 27 - March 1, I attended the Nepcon/Etronics trade show in Anaheim on behalf of the Alliance. As of this date, the Alliance has committed to the following trade shows, which I will attend: · Westec 2001, March 26-29, Los Angeles · BIO 2001, June 25-27, San Diego Broker Breakfast Our first Broker Breakfast was a success! The feedback I have received has been very positive. The brokers asked that we have the breakfast eadier, however they really liked the format, information provided and the location. It was discussed and agreed upon that the Alliance will host future breakfasts on a quarterly basis. I have listed a few dates below to consider for our next breakfast: June 7"' 8:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. June 14th 8:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. Business Relations Committee The Business Relations Committee will assist the Alliance with our goals by targeting their business visitations to businesses in the medical device, high tech manufacturing, bio- medical and tele-communications industries. At the last Business Relations meeting, we reviewed the questionnaire to businesses and added questions that would provide beneficial information to the Alliance. We are also welcome to attend visitations with the committee members. I will provide visitation reports and information in future monthly updates. Valley Business Journal Beginning in April, the Alliance will have a regular column in the Valley Business Journal. will provide copies to each Partner once published. On an ongoing basis I attend the following meetings: Manufacturer's Council Business Relations Committee EDC IEEP Partner meetings Economic Development meetings concerning the Southwest Riverside County region. If you need any additional information or have any questions, please contact me at (909) 600-6066. Sincerely, Stevie Hirdler Marketing Coordinator Copy: Brad Hudson Robin Zimpfer Sarah Mundy Robert Moran Teresa Gallavan TEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL ACTIVITIES REPORT February 2001 Members of the Temecula Valley Film Council are Maggi Allen, President; Sunny Thomas, Vice-President; Steve Phelps, Secretary/Treasurer; Sheri Davis, Pat Martinez, Judi Staats, Eve Craig, Joe Hohenberger, Patty Slaton and Ellen Watkins The Business of the Film Council · This month we received 95 phone calls; 21 - Film Festival, 35- locations information requests, 9- .Talent Showcase, 30- council business. · The TVFC web site. www.temeculafilm.org has received 741 "hits" since it opened on September 4, 2000. Photo and link updates are a continuous process· · TVFC welcomes new Board member, Pat Martinez, whose background in Event coordinating and volunteering with the Film Festival makes her a great addition to our council· She replaces Stacy Sievek who will be transferring to our Liaison Board. · The "Great Temecula Shoot Out" began on February 17 and due to weather conditions has been extended to March 24th. Over 120 disposable cameras have been assigned to local groups and individuals to take - pictures of the special places they know of in the Temecula Valley.. Local response has been very favorable. New photos will be turned into Temecula Postcards and later a 16 month calendar of "Temecula Through Our Eyes". This promotion will increase our locations photo library by over 3000 pictures and increase awareness of the Film Council locally. · ' · " ' ns 2001" which was held February · TVFC participated ~n AFCI Locat~o 23-25 in the LA Convention Center. We distributed local locations photos and filming information. Information about the Film Festival, wineries and the Balloon and Wine Festival was also distributed. Through drawing entries for a Temecula Basket, over 100 additional names will be added to our mailing list and we received over 20 specific locations requests which we were able to follow up either by mail or eMail. Temecula Talent Showcase 2001 is scheduled for May 19th at the CRC. Auditions are to be held in March 24t~ & 25thand April 7th & 8*. The first production meeting for the Temecula Valley Film "Festival 2001" was held on February 9th. Local volunteers were assigned to committees and it was decided that this group would meet on a monthly basis until August or September when more t~equent meetings will be needed. Sponsorship procurement is under way with a special Pre- Festival party being held on March 20h. This year's Film Festival will include a World Music Festival which is being well received by the community. Filming in Temecula · The first taping of the Temecula Students of the Month was done on February 26t~. Unfortunately there were camera problems and only half of the tape was usable. The students from Chaparral High School will use this t~a~e to practice editing for next time. The next filming will be on March 26 with the hopes of getting on TV the second week of April... · Dick Reed Photography of Phoenix shot film for two days in the Wine Country for Subaru Ads using points of interest in Southern California. Callaway, Wilson Creek and Palomar wineries were used. · Thanks to a referral from the Chamber of Commerce, TVFC coordinated with GPI Corporation from Toronto as they filmed in Hart Winery, the wine country and Old Town. We were able to arrange for the GPI film crew to meet with Councilman Jeff Stone for an on camera interview about what makes Temecula a great tourist destination. This film will be shown as part of GPI's television show "Distant Roads" which is directed at RV travelers and will be shown on the KPXN (PAX) cable network. Thank you to Councilman Stone who made an excellent presentation as usual. We will continue to support the daily management of filmmaker's req. uests, and encourage the growing awareness of the industry in this commumty. It is our goal to generate a higher awareness of the Temecula Area within the context of filmmaking activities, and to present the opporttmities and benefits of this production to local merchants and businesses. Respectfully, Maggi Allen President, TVFC TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINA.,b~,,~__ CITY MANAGER / CITY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer March 27, 2001 Department of Public Works Monthly Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for the month of February, 2001. MOACTRPT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report February / March 2001 Prepared By: Amer Attar Submitted by: William G. Hughes Date: March 27, 2001 PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION 1. First Street Bridge This project will construct First Street from Pujol Street to Old Town Front Street, including the construction of a bridge over Murrieta Creek and the realignment of Santiago Road. The new intersection of First Street, Old Town Front Street, and Santiago Road will be signalized. The bridge approach slabs are complete with the barrier rail construction underway. Weather permitting, the asphalt paving on the northside of Santiago Road and the remainder of First Street is scheduled to occur the first week in April. Installation of the traffic signal at First Street / Santiago Road and Front Street along with the streetlights shall begin by the End of this month. Construction of the EMWD lift station continues. Completion of this project is scheduled for April 2001. 2. Old Town Parking Lot This project will rehabilitate the Stampede parking lot. It includes resurfacing, landscaping, and Old Town Series lights. TruGreen began construction on the parking lot on October 2, 2000. Construction is complete with punch list items remainipg. 3. Pala Road Bridge Environmental Restoration/Median and Parkway Landscape Improvements This project will install landscape improvements along Pala Road and Cupeno Lane and restore the wetlands in the construction zone. It includes the installation of an irrigation system, planting, and hydroseeding. Median & Parkway work is complete. Restoration work commenced on 3/19/01. 4. Pala Road Bridge Environmental Mitigation The wetlands creation site located approximately 1 72 mile east of the bridge project has been planted. The 120-day plant establishment period is complete. The five-year maintenance program continues. 5. PalaRoad Soundwalls Work on this project includes the construction of masonry block Soundwalls on Pala Road from west of Rainbow Canyon Road to east of Club House Drive. The wall averages 14' in height. The sound wall is complete. Landscaping and other miscellaneous repairs should be completed by the end of March. 6. Sports Park Pond Desiltation The project included the removal of 15,000 cubic yards of silt from the existing pond located along Rancho Vista Road. The project is complete. Notice of Completion is scheduled to go to Council on 04/10/01. R:\MonfldyActivityReport\CIP\2001 \February.dec 7. Rancho California Sports Park Field Lighting Under this project, new lights will be installed in all fields. The project is essentially complete. Adjustment of the direction and retrofitting the fixtures remain. Field repairs are underway. Rain has delayed completion. 8. Murrieta Creek Crossing Between Winchester and Rancho California Road - Low-flow Crossing at Via Montezuma This project will construct a low-flow crossing of Murrieta Creek connecting Diaz and Del Rio at Via Montezuma. In addition, this project will rehabilitate the s~xeet of Via Montezuma. At the February 13, 2001 meeting, the City Council awarded the construction contract to Terra-Cai Construction for the amount of $404,587.70 The City's Planning Department has completed the CEQA process. Tom Dodson & Associates, an environmental consultant, has submitted the necessary applications for the permitting process. Fish & Game issued their permit. Army Corps and RCFCD are waiting for the Water Board to issue their certification so they can issue their permits. Water Board certification is expected before the end of March. RCFCD is developing a cooperative agreement with the City for the construction and maintenance of the Low-Flow. The project area was manually cleared prior to March 15, the beginning of the nesting season. Construction will start as soon as all the necessary permits are obtained. 9. City Maintenance Facility Alterations, Phase III This project will modify the existing two story masonry block building to accommodate a new second floor of office space over the existing two-story maintenance bay, including the installation of an elevator, and two new second floor restrooms. Construction will also include a single story office space addition. The contract was awarded to T&M construction with a bid amount of $600,000.00. The contract is scheduled to start at the beginning of April, if all Bonds & Insurance Certificates are in order. 10. Margarita Road Widening, Pauba Road to Dartolo Road This project will widen Margarita Road fi.om Plo Pico to Dartolo Road and re-landscape the medians from De Portola to SR 79 South. We are also including the pavement rehabilitation of Phase II (Pauba Road to Pio Pico) as part of this phase of the project. City Council awarded the project on 3/6/01 to R.J. Noble with a bid amount of $1,266,140.80. Contract documents and Purchase Order issuance are pending. 11. Rancho California Sports Park Culvert Modification In this project, the existing culvert will need to be modified to eliminate a slope erosion problem. The project was advertised for bids and bids were opened on March 6, 2001. Council is scheduled to award the construction contract on March 27, 2001. 12. Light Emitting Diode (LED) Traffic Signal Conversion Program A grant award in the amount of $140,870.00 was obtained to replace incandescent traffic signal lights with Light Emitting Diode (LED). Under this program, all traffic signal lights in the City of Temecula will be replaced with the energy efficient, long lasting LED lights. The City will recover its matching costs in energy savings in two to three years. Bids were opened on March 6, 2001. Contract award is scheduled for thc March 27, 2001 City Council meeting. 2 R:\MonthlyActivityRepor t\CIP\2001 \February.doc PROJECTS BEING ADVERTISED FOR BIDS 1. Traffic Signal installation at Stonewood and Margarita In this project, a traffic signal will be installed on Margarita Road at Stoncwood Drive. Final plans, specifications, and cost estimate are complete. The City Council approved the plans and specifications and authorized the bidding of this project at the February 13, 2001 meeting. Bid opening is scheduled for March 22, 2001. 2. Pavement Management System, Jefferson Avenue This project will rehabilitate Jefferson Avenue from the northerly City limits to Overland Drive. Areas to be rehabilitated were identified, and plans and specifications were completed. The project is being advertised for bids. Bid opening is scheduled for March 22, 2001. PROJECTS IN DESIGN 1. Diaz Road Realignment Under this project, Diaz Road will be realigned to Vincent Moraga Road at Rancho California Road. Business Park Drive will be a T-intersection at Diaz. In response to additional design cost requests by the designer, City staff has elected to complete the design in-house. Anticipated design completion is scheduled for June 2001. 2. Pala Road Improvements - Phase II (79 South to Pechanga Road) This project will widen Pala Road to its ultimate width from the Pala Road Bridge to Pechanga road. Plan check comments (70% Submittal) were returned to the consultant. Work is proceeding on the remainder of the design. The approval of Wolf Creek Drainage Basin Study by RCFC & WCD has been delayed about a month because hydrology studies upstream of Wolf Creek require prior approval. Staff will be using an appraiser to assist in the preparation of the real estate appraisal report. The project is funded for design only at this time. 3. Rancho California Road Median Modifications at Town Center and The project will include the closing of the two median openings on Rancho California Road in front of the Town Center, while lengthening the left turn lanes at Ynez Road, Town Center Drive, and Via Los Colinas to improve traffic circulation. 4. Rancho California Road Widening at Ynez Road (Add right turn lane to westbound lanes) This project will add a right turn lane on westbound Rancho California Road at Ynez Road. Right of way acquisition at the northeast comer of Rancho California and Ynez will be required. Design is in process and appraisals are due at the end of the March. 3 R:\MonthlyActivityReport\CIP\2001 \February,doc 5. Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II (Margarita Road to Showalter Road) This project will widen Pauba Road from Showalter to just west of Margarita Road to its ultimate width. The project is in design and the work is being coordinated with design of the library project. All utility issues are being addressed. 70% design plans have been plan-checked and returned to the consultant for corrections. Staff will begin contacting property owners to discuss driveway revisions and new easements. Potholing of utilities has been performed along Pauba to determine elevations of existing lines. 6. Senior Center Expansion The expansion will include an addition of 3000 square feet to the existing building. The expansion will be for recreational, office, and meeting purposes. The project is currently undergoing a third plan check review. 7. Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Over Murrieta Creek This project will widen Rancho California Bridge over Murrieta Creek to provide additional traffic lanes. Design of the project began in September 2000. Design will take six months. The bridge widening will include four additional lanes. Staff reviewed the preliminary layout submitted and provided the consultant with comments. Submittal of 30% drawings is scheduled for the end of March 2001 for staff review. Provisions for a trail route across the bridge is being considered. 8. Chaparral High School Swimming Pool The design committee decided upon the layout of the 25-yard x 25-meter pool at Chaparral High School. The facility will include a smaller recreation pool component and a bathhouse with locker room facilities, restrooms and showers. Spray-type play equipment will be included in the construction bid as an alternate. The design concept was completed. The City and TVUSD reviewed the first design submittal and the corrected plans were received on March 21,2001. The plans require Division of State Architect review and the plans are currently in process with DSA. This project is on a tight schedule to construct the pool during the summer, when school is out. 9. Starlight Ridge Southern Cross Road Sidewalk Project This Project will install approximately one mile of sidewalk on the northwest side of Southern Cross Road. Field survey was completed. Design is about 40% complete. 10. Pavement Management System - Citywide This project will involve rehabilitating various streets in the City for FY 2000-01. A list of streets has been selected and staffis currently preparing the contract documents. Geotechnical evaluation of the streets to be rehabilitated will be done as soon as a consultant is hired. In addition, the Pavement Management System Program (PMS) for the City will be updated. 11. Margarita Road/Winchester Road Intersection Improvements Under this project, an additional left turn from eastbound Winchester to northbound Margarita will be added to accommodate increasing traffic. Field survey was completed. The in-house design, including the preparation of the base maps is underway. Coordination with Caltrans will be required since Winchester is a State Route at this location. Project will be processed as a Caltrans Encroachment Permit. 4 R:\MonthlyActivity Repor t\CIP\2001 \Februar y.doc 12. 1-15 Northbound On-Ramp Widening at Winchester Road This project will re-stripe Westbound Winchester Road from Ynez Road to I-l 5 Northbound on-ramp to allow for a better flow of traffic. A consultant has completed a final striping plan. The City applied for an Encroachment Permit from Caltrans to do thc striping. Caltrans is reviewing. 13. Overland Drive Extension/Murrieta Creek Bridge This project will entail alignment studies and design of an extension of Overland Drive, westerly to Diaz Road, which includes a new bridge over Murrieta Creek. The project includes the widening of Overland Drive from Jefferson Avenue to Commerce Center Drive, and the extension of Overland Drive across Murrieta Creek to Diaz Road. Project Design Consultant (PDC), thc designer, is working on the final version of the alignment study & report. It is to be submitted to the City at the end of March. 14. Winchester Road Widening Between Enterprise Circle and Jefferson This project will add a right turn lane from Eastbound Winchester to Southbound Jefferson, starting at Enterprise Circle. Preliminary utility research and data gathering is underway. O'Mafiey Engineering Corporation is providing thc design survey which is scheduled to be completed by the end of thc month. Once data is received from consultant, staffwill begin design with completion scheduled for thc end of May. 15. AC Street Repairs - FY2001 This project will rehabilitate and reconstruct selected City streets during 2001. A list of streets has been selected and staff is currently preparing the contract documents. 16. Pujol Street Sidewalk Improvements - Phase II This project will complete thc knuckle at thc intersection of Sixth Street and Felix Valdcz. Data gathering, concept review, preliminary layout is underway. 17. Landscaping and Sidewalk On 79 South (Front Street to Pala Road) The project consists of the design and construction of new sidewalk and landscaping along the south side of State Highway 79 South between Pala Road and Old Town Front Street. Data gathering, concept review, preliminary layout is underway. 18. Temecula Library A full service library, approximately 34,000 square feet in area, will be designed and built on Pauba Road, just west of Fire Station #84. This project will provide the community with library resources and services. The design is progressing on schedule. The architect started on the final drawings after the committee completed its design and development meetings. The State Librarian is holding Public Hearings that include all agencies to develop the guidelines for the approved Bond measure. Letters were sent to all the utilities requesting service information. Utility services construction is being coordinated with Pauba Road, Phase II project. 19. Street Name Sign Replacement This project will entail removing the existing wooden signs in the La Serena area and replacing them with plastic signs selected by the Public Traffic Safety Commission. Plans and specifications are 95% complete. 5 R:\MonthlyActivityRepor t\CIP\2001 \Februar y.doc 20. Traffic Signals Design at Pala Road and Loma Linda, and at Pala Road and Wolf Valley Two new traffic signals will be installed on Pala Road, one at Loma Linda and the other at WolffValley. The plans and specifications are complete. The project is being coordinated with Pechanga Development Corporation sewer project. This project is on hold due to environmental constraints. 21. Pala Road Interim Improvements - (Widening to accommodate four lanes from Loma Linda Bridge to Wolf Valley) Pala Road Interim Improvements (58 feet in width) will be completed with the second phase of construction of the Pala Road Trunk Sewer (Pechanga Development Corporation project). An encroachment permit was issued for the construction of the trunk sewer and the interim street improvements. Traffic signal and striping plans are complete. The construction of Pala Road Trunk Sewer (Phase Two) by the Pechanga Development Corporation from Clubhouse Drive to the new Pechanga Casino Driveway (600 feet southeast of Wolf Valley Road) started November 6, 2000 and the approximate completion date is Spring 2001. The interim project is on hold due to environmental constraints. 22. Santa Gertrudis Bridge Widening at 1-15 This is Phase II of the Southbound Auxiliary Lane project at the southbound exit ramp for Winchester Road. This project will widen the 1-15 southbound exit-ramp at the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge to provide an additional lane on the exit ramp just north of Winchester Road. Staff is revisiting the merits of this project in light of the proposed Project Study Report for Cherry Street Interchange. The study shows that this bridge may have to be removed in the future to accommodate the Cherry Street Interchange. 23. Santiago Road/Ynez Road Intersection Improvements This project will widen, realign, and adjust the traffic signal timing of the existing intersection. This project has been delayed indefinitely. The Traffic Division completed some minor striping and signal adjustments that improved traffic movement through the intersection. 6 R:\MonthlyActivityRepor t\ClP\2001 \February .doc ,.0 LLI I-'- Oo D. ,,,0 UJ .-I fl. tuO t~ , Oo a. wO I- fl.. LU TO: FROM: DATE: MEMORANDUM Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent March 2, 200t SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - February, 2001 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of February, 2001: I. SIGNS A. B. C. Total signs replaced Total signs installed Total signs repaired 38 23 7 10 3,482 21 366 II. TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns II1. ASPHALT REPAIRS A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs B. Total Tons IV. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement 1,480 VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations B. Total S.F. 30 631 VII. STENCILING A. - 0 - New and repainted legends B. 1,466 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and stdping Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 56 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 43 service order requests for the month of January, 2001. The Maintenance Crew has also put in. 163 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of February, 2001 was $ 49,150.00 compared to ~ 29,783.$0 for the month of January, 2001. Account No. 5402 $ 28,870.00 Account No. 5401 $18,295.00 Account No. 999-5402 $ 1,985.00 cc: Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer - (CIP/Traffic) Greg Butler, Senior Engineer - (Capital Improvements) Amer Attar, Senior Engineer - (Capital Improvements) Jerry Alegria, Senior Engineer - (Land Development) STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of February, 2001 DATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST ACCOUNT STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE OF WORK SIZE CONTRACTOR: RENE'S COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT Date: 02/14/01 OLD TOWN WEED ABATEMENT, WEED SPRAYING & TRASH, DEBRIS REMOVAL //5402 TOTAL COST $ $,000.00 )ate: 02/26/01 MARGARITA ROAD / NO. GENERAL WEED ABATEMENT, WEED SPRAYING & KEARNY TRASH, DEBRIS REMOVAL # 5401 DESILTATION POND TOTAL COST $ 3,985.00 CONTRACTOR: MONTEI,EONE EXCAVATING Date: 02/23/01 OLD TOWN WASHING OF STREETS FOR ROD RUN : # 5402 TOTAL COST $ 500.00 Date: 02/23/01 MARGARITA ROAD / NO. GENERAL REMOVAL OF S1LT & DEBRIS FROM CHANNEL KEARNY # 5401 DESILTAT1ON POND TOTAL COST $15,000.00 Date: 02/05/01 SERVICE LEVEL "R" GRADE D1RT ROADS FOR ACCESS 02/23/01 //999-5402 DIRT ROAD AREAS TOTAL COST $1,985.00 STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of February, 200t DATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST ACCOUNT STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE OF WORK SITE CONTRACTOR: BECKER ENGINEERING Date: 02/16/01 1sT STREET CONSTRUCT P.C.C. V-DITCH FOR PROPER 3RAINAGE CHANNEL DRAINAGE # 5401 TOTAL COST $ 9,885.00 Date: 02/15/01 MARGARITA ROAD NORTH OF ~EPAIR DAMAGED ROCK IN CENTER MEDIAN WINCHESTER # 5402 TOTAL COST $1,575.00 Date: 02/08/01 VALLEJO AT YNEZ ROAD REMOVE AND REPLACE DAMAGED ASPHALT GUTTER & DOWN SPOUT # 5402 TOTAL COST $ 915.00 Date: 02/08/01 29001 YNEZ ROAD REMOVE AND REPLACE A.C. DRIVE APPROACH # 5402 TOTAL COST $ $,220.00 Date: 02/01/01 YNEZ ROAD SOUTH OF SANTIAGO INSTALL 630 L.F.A.C. BERM AND BACKFILL EROSION WITH 50 TONS I ½' # 5402 ROCK TOTAL COST $7,085.00 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5401 $ 18,295.01 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5402 $ 28,870.00 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #99-5402 $ 1,985.00 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION STENCILS / STRIPING MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 2001 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 02/21/01 41846 MARGARITA INSTALLED 80 L.F. OF RED CURB 02/21/01 NICHOLAS WEST OF WINCHESTER INSTALLED 1,386 L.F. OF RED CURB TOTAL NEW & REPAINTED LEGENDS -0- NEW & REPAINTED RED CURB &STRIPING L.F. 1~466 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION RIGHT-OF-WAY TREE TRIMMING MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 2001 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 02/26/01 MEADOWVIEW AREA TRIMMED 10 R.O.W. TREES TOTAL R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED 10 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 2000 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 02/01/01 AREA #3 CLEANED & CHECKED 25 CATCH BASINS 02/02/01 AREA #3 CLEANED & CHECKED 7 CATCH BASINS 02/05/01 MEADOWVIEW "DOWN SPOUTS" CLEANED & CHECKED 10 CATCH BASINS 02/05/01 AREA #3 CLEANED & CHECKED 8 CATCH BASINS 02/06/01 AREA #3 CLEANED & CHECKED 24 CATCH BASINS 02/08/01 AREA #3 CLEANED & CHECKED 18 CATCH BASINS 02/10/01 AREA #3 AND AREA #4 "RAIN" CLEANED & CHECKED 15 CATCH BASINS 02/13/01 CITYWIDE "RAIN" CLEANED & CHECKED 38 CATCH BASINS 02/14/01 C1TYWIDE "RAIN" CLEANED & CHECKED 7 CATCH BASINS 02/20/01 OLD TOWN CLEANED & CHECKED 2 CATCH BASINS 02/20/01 AREA #3 AND AREA #4 CLEANED & CHECKED 18 CATCH BASINS 02/21/01 AREA #3 AND AREA #4 CLEANED & CHECKED 26 CATCH BASINS 02/22/01 MEADOWVIEW AREA CLEANED & CHECKED 38 OVER-THE-SIDE DRAINS 02/23/01 CITYWIDE "RAIN" CLEANED & CHECKED 38 CATCH BASINS 02/26/01 CITYWIDE "RAIN" CLEANED & CHECKED 43 CATCH BASINS 02/27/01 CITYWIDE "RAIN" CLEANED & CHECKED 49 CATCH BASINS TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED 366 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SIGNS MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 2001 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 02/01/01 MARGARITA BRIDGE REPLACED 18 TYPE Q'S 02/01/01 40390 MARGARITA REPLACED 5 TYPE Q'S 02/01/01 SOLANA AT YNEZ REPLACED TYPE K 02/01/01 LA SERENA AT MEADOWS REPLACED 3 TYPE Q'S 02/07/01 RANCHO VISTA 200' EAST OF MIRA LOMA REPLACED W-41 02/07/01 MARGARITA NORTH OF WINCHESTER INSTALL R-7 "5" 02/07/01 MARGARITA NORTH OF W~NCHESTER INSTALL 5 K-MARKERS 02/07/01 MARGARITA AT SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK REPLACE R-7 02/08/01 VINTAGE CIRCLE AT CAFERA REPLACE R-I 02/08/01 PROMENADE CHARDONNAY AT HEITZ REPLACE R-1 02/08/01 OVERLAND - MARGARITA TO YNEZ INSTALL TYPE K GLUE DOWN 4 02/09/01 VIA PURETA AT CAMINO DEL ESTE INSTALL S.N.S. 02/10/01 VIA RIVAS AT CORTE ALMERiA REPLACED R-1 FADED 02/10/01 VIA RIVAS AT MONTELEGRO REPLACED R-1 FADED 02/16/01 VIA POQUITO AT AVENIDA DE MISSIONS REPLACED R-1 T.C. 02/17/01 MARGARITA SOUTH OF WINCHESTER REPLACED R-7 T.C. 02/20/01 CREEKSIDE AT CLUBHOUSE REPLACED S.N.S. T.C. 02/20/01 VIA POQUITO AT AVENIDA DE MISSIONS REPLACED S.N.S. T.C. 02/20/01 DE PORTOLA AT MEADOWS REPLACED W- 17 MISSING 02/22/01 CORTE PARADO AT CAMINO MERANO INSTALLED W-53 02/26/01 WALCOTT LANE AT WALCOTT ROAD INSTALLED 2 TYPE "N" MARKERS TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED 38 TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED 23 TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED 7 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION ASPHALT (POTHOLES) REPAIRS MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 2001 DATE LOCATION SCOPE OF WORK S.F. TOTAL TONS 02/01/01 JEFFERSON IN CENTER MEDIAN POTHOLE FOR CIP 8 1.5 02/05/01 30475 DEL REY OVERLAY BERM 8 1.5 02/05/01 29944 CALLE OLVERA R & R A.C. 24 ,~ 02/05/01 NICHOLAS AT JOSEPH R & R BERM 10 J. 02/05/01 PALA SOUTH OF LOMALINDA POTHOLE REPAIR 4 02/05/01 PALA AT MUIRFIELD POTHOLE REPAIR 5 02/06/01 NICHOLAS ROAD EAST OF JOSEPH POTHOLE REPAIR 670 2.08 02/08/01 NICHOLAS ROAD EAST OF JOSEPH POTHOLE REPAIR 705 2.2 02/10/01 CITYWIDE "RAIN" POTHOLE REPAIR 16 TEMP. A.C 02/13/01 ClTYW1DE "RAIN" POTHOLE REPAIR 25 TEMP. A.C. 02/14/01 CITYWlDE "RAIN" POTHOLE REPAIR 20 TEMP. A.C. 02/14/01 PALA ROAD POTHOLE REPAIR 30 TEMP. A.C. 02/15/01 MERCEDES AT 6TM STREET R & R A.C. 552 6 02/16/01 JEFFERSON NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD POTHOLE REPAIR 36 TEMP A.C. 02/20/01 CITYWIDE "RAIN" POTHOLE REPAIR 84 TEMP A.C. 02/21/01 45586 RAINBOW CANYON ROAD A.C. OVERLAY 330 2.5 02/22/01 NICHOLAS ROAD & RAINBOW CANYON ROAD A.C. OVERLAY 340 3.0 02/26/01 CITYWIDE "RAIN" POTHOLE REPAIR 178 TEMP A.C. 02/27/01 CITYWIDE "RAIN" POTHOLE REPAIR 260 TEMP A.C. 02/28/01 CITYWIDE "RAIN" POTHOLE REPAIR 177 TEMP A.C. TOTAL S.F. OF REPAIRS 3~482 TOTAL TONS 2.l__~1 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION GRAFFITI REMOVAL MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 2001 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 02/01/01 YNEZNORTH OF WINCHESTER REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 02/05/01 WINCHESTER & YNEZ REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 02/05/01 CAMINO DEL ESTE AT CAMINO VERDE REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 02/05/01 BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AT BRENTWOOD REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 02/06/01 CAMINO DEL ESTE AT CAMINO VERDE REMOVED 130 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 02/06/01 41375 McCABE COURT REMOVED 135 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 02/07/01 MARGARITA AT WINCHESTER REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 02/07/01 WINCHESTER CREEK PARK REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 02/08/01 MARGARITA SOUTH OF RUSTIC GLENN REMOVED 54 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 02/08/01 NICOLAS AT VILLA VENECIA REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFIT 02/08/01 NICOLAS AT CALLE MEDUSA REMOVED 60 S.F. OF GRAFFIT 02/08/01 NICOLAS AT WARBLER REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 02/09/01 SANTA GERTRUDIS AND 1-15 REMOVED 30 S.F. OF GRAFFITi 02/13/01 28566 PUJOL REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 02/14/01 42081 MAIN STREET REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 02/14/01 27520 YNEZ REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 02/14/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT HUMBER REMOVED 30 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 02/14/01 RAMSEY COURT REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 02/14/01 YNEZ AT WINCHESTER REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 02/14/01 27560 JEFFERSON REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 02/15/01 42049 & 42031 MAIN STREET REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 02/16/01 ARDEN REALTY BUILDING REMOVED 5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 02/21/01 A.B.C. PRE SCHOOL ON YNEZ REMOVED 110 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 02/23/01 YNEZ AT TOWN CENTER REMOVED 5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 02/26/01 40412 WINCHESTER REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 02/27/01 MARGARITA AT RUSTIC GLEN REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 02/27/01 31159 CAMINO DEL ESTE REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 02/28/01 41437 CALLE TAJO REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 02/28/01 41403 CALLE TAJO REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 02/28/01 CALALE TAJO AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED 631 TOTAL LOCATIONS 30 0 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG MONTH OF FE~ DATE LOCATION REQUEST DATE WORK RECEIVED COMPLETED 02/01/01 45025 CORTE ALEGRA DRBRIS REMOVAL 02/01/01 02/01/01 PALA ROAD AT VIA CONSUELO SINKHOLE 02/01/01 02/02/01 45570 RAINBOW CANYON ROAD AC REPAIR 02/05/01 02/02/01 PALA ROAD AT VIA CONSUELO AC REPAIR 02/05/01 02/05/01 31155 DOG LEG CIRCLE CONCRETE REPAIR 02/05/01 02/05/01 BUTTERFIELD STAGE AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. SIGN 02/05/01 02/05/01 43325 & 43326 CALLE NACIDO STORM DRAINS 02/05/01 02/06/01 CALLE ROSSO AT VIA RAMO STORM DRAINS 02/06/01 02/06/01 STAMPEDE PARKING LOT TRASH 02/06/01 02/07/01 41944 CORTE VALENTINE OIL SLICK 02/07/01 02/08/01 VIA LOBA IN FIELD FURNITURE 02/08/01 02/08/01 DAWN CREST CIRCLE AT RYCREST LANDSCAPING 02/09/01 02/08/01 31563 CALLE LOS PADRES RETURNED BLUE RPM 02/08/01 02/08/01 45680 CLUBHOUSE DRIVE S.N.S. KNOCKED DOWN 02/20/01 02/09/01 43225 AVENIDA DE SAN PASQUAL STANDING WATER 02/09/01 02/13/01 41971 MAIN STREET SIDEWALK SLIPPERY 02/13/01 02/13/01 43550 JOHN WARNER CULVERT CLEARING 02/13/01 02/13/01 43550 RIDGE PARK DRIVE DIRT ROAD WASHED OUT 02/13/01 02/13/01 41844 FOURTH STREET MUD IN STREET 02/14/01 02/13/01 43563 JOHN WARNER ROAD ROAD WASHED OUT 02/13/01 02/14/01 41834 DE LA TORRE SOAP SUDS IN DITCH 02/14/01 02/14/01 30680 SANTIAGO POTHOLES 02/14/01 02/14/01 31166 SAHO COURT STORM DRAIN MAINT. 02/14/01 02/14/01 46695 SAND1A CREEK DRIVE POTHOLES 02/20/01 02/15/01 JOHN WARNER ROAD ROCKS IN ROAD 02/21/01 02/15/01 39634 RUSTIC GLEN STANDING WATER 02/16/01 0-2/16/01 43771 JOHN WARNER ROAD ROCKS IN ROAD 02/16/01 DATE LOCATION REQUEST DATE WORK RECEIVED COMPLETED 02/20/01 40382 CALLE KATERINE BROKEN P.C.C. 02/20/01 02/20/01 30338 SIERRA MADRE POTHOLE 02/20/01 02/21/01 39445 PALO VISTA DRiVE GRADE ROAD 02/21/01 02/22/01 CAMINO DEL ESTE AT VIA PUERTA MISSING S.N.S. 02/22/01 02/22/01 30586 SOUTHERN CROSS ROOT PRUNE 02/22/01 02/22/01 31952 VALONE COURT RAIN EROSION 02/22/01 02/22/01 30220 DEL REY ROAD TRIPPING HAZARD 02/22/01 02/23/01 42030 MAIN STREET SIDEWALK WET 02/23/01 02/23/01 45438 CLUBHOUSE DRIVE DEBRIS PICK-UP 02/23/01 02/26/01 41393 AVENIDA DE LA REINA TREE PLANTING 02/26/01 02/26/01 30241 CABRILLO FLOODING PROBLEM 02/26/01 02/26/01 MARGARITA AT DE PORTOLA POTHOLES 02/26/01 02/26/01 30235 YNEZ ROAD PLUGGED STORM DRAIN 02/26/01 02/26/01 43945 NORTH GATE DEBRIS REMOVAL 02/26/01 02/26/01 30680 SANTIAGO ROAD DIRT ROAD WASHED OUT 02/26/01 02/26/01 41304 BRAVOS COURT RAIN EROSION 02/26/01 02/27/01 31952 VALONE COURT THANK YOU 02/27/01 02/27/01 CABRILLO AT JOHN WARNER MUD IN STREET 02/27/01 02/27/01 CABRILLON AT JOHN WARNER MUD IN STREET 02/27/01 02/27/01 27025 WINCHESTER CREEK AVENUE MUD BLOCKING DRIVEWAY 02/27/01 02/27/01 28551 FRONT STREET BUSINESS FLOODING 02/27/01 02/27/01 39835 CANTRELL ROAD MUD IN STREET 02/27/01 02/27/01 41797 GREEN TREE ROAD POTHOLES 02/27/01 02/28/01 38925 CALLE BREVE POTHOLES 02/28/01 02/28/01 30985 SANTIAGO ROAD RAlN EROSION 02/28/01 02/28/01 30984 LOLITA ROAD RAIN EROSION 02/28/01 02/28/01 41050 AVEN1DA VERDE RAIN EROSION 02/28/01 02/28/01 LONG VALLEY ROAD DEBRIS PICK-UP 02/28/01 02/28/01 MARGARITA AT MORAGA EXPOSED WIRES 02/28/01 TOTAL SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS 5~6 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager Mamh 27, 2001 Monthly Report The following are the recent highlights for the Planning Division of the Community Development Department in the month of February 2001. CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES New Cases The Division received 46 new applications for administrative, other minor cases, and home occupations and 8 applications for public hearings during the month of February. The new public hearing cases are as follows: Development Plan Specific Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit Massage Establishment Parcel Map 1 1 4 1 1 Status of Major Projects Staff is working with project applicants to address any remaining issues and prepare the following cases for public hearing before the Planning Director or Planning Commission: The Villages of Temecula - The design and construction of a 160-unit, 2-story apartment complex w/clubhouse and pool, on the south side of Rancho California Road, between Cosmic Drive and south extension of Moraga, east of the proposed Temecula Ridge Apartments; and a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to Planned Development Oveday for an office/retail component along Rancho California Road. The community meeting with adjacent property owners and homeowners' associations was held on February 8, 2001. The applicant is preparing additional information in response to questions and concerns raised at the community meeting. R:~monthly.rpt~001\FEBRUARY 2001 .doc 1 Harveston (Formerly known as Sweetwater - Lennar Communities) Specific Plan, General Plan Amendment and Development Agreement- located north of Santa Gertrudis Creek and west of Chapparal High School. The response to comments on the draft EIR is currently being prepared and the Development Agreement deal points are currently being negotiated with the applicant. Roripaugh Ranch Annexation, Specific Plan, Environmental Impact Report and Development Agreement: Staff has made comments on the draft Specific Plan. The Environmental Impact Report will be recirculated. The Development Agreement deal points are being negotiated with the applicant. BeI-Villaggio Retail Center- This 116,000 square foot retail center on 18 acres is located in the Regional Center Specific Plan on Margarita Road. The Planning Commission approved the project on January 31, 2001. Meadowview Golf Course -On June 7, 2000, the Planning Commission continued the case off calendar at the request of the applicant. The applicant is preparing a focused EIR, anticipated to be completed in June, 2001. Hilton Garden Hotel - To construct a 100-room hotel on 1.36 acres located on the west side of Rancho Highland Drive, west of Ynez Road. The accompanying General Plan Amendment is on hold with the City Council. Palomar Hotel - Remodel of the existing Palomar Hotel to the Palomar Inn (a bed and breakfast) located on the northeast corner of Front and Fifth Streets. DRC meeting was held on January 27, 2000. Staff is awaiting re-submittal. Southern California Storage - Planning application to build a 65,000 self-storage facility intending to serve the commercial and industrial businesses. Located on Winchester Road west of Diaz Road. Plans were resubmitted for review on May 31,2000. A meeting was held with the applicant on August 16, 2000. A third submittal was turned in for review November 22, 2000. The project was approved by the Planning Commission on February 21, 2001. Waltz Industrial Building - A 9,000 concrete tilt-up facility for N/C Industries located on the Southside of Roick Drive and west of Winchester Road. A DRC meeting was held October 5, 2000 and staff is awaiting resubmittal. Margarita Medical - A proposal for 12,319 square foot medical office complex on the southeast corner of N. General Kearney and Margarita Road. A DRC meeting was held November 30, 2000. Second submittal received on January 19, 2001. Accel/Gentek Industrial Building - A proposal to build two attached tilt-up industrial buildings totaling 33,527 square feet on two one acre lots on the south side of Winchester Road and west of Diaz Road. A DRC meeting was held November 30, 2000. Second submittal received on January 17, 2001. Sunridge Community Church - An 88,918 square foot religious facility in two phases for worship, programs, Sunday school, weddings and funerals, consisting of a single-story, 1,500- seat auditorium with nursery; a two-story, 21-room education facility for elementary through junior high grades; a single-story, 9,840 square foot multi-purpose building with kitchen, lockers and assembly room; a two-story, 10,622 square foot administration and Sunday school building; a single-story, 6,163 square foot youth center building; and a single-story, 1,040 square foot storage and maintenance building. The proposed site is on the west side of the R:\MONTHLY.RPT~2001\FEBRUARY 2001.doc extension of Butterfield Stage Road, 1,400 feet north of Rancho California Road. A community. meeting was held on January 11,2001. Staff has requested a supplemental EIR, redesign of the project and another community meeting. Etco Plaza - The design and construction of two speculative buildings, each at 23,500 square foot, on two lots. The lots are located on the east side of Madison Avenue at the end of Sanborn Avenue. The project went to DRC on November 30, 2000 and is scheduled for Planning Commission review on March 28, 2001. AT&T Wireless Services Facility - Proposal to install a 67' high mono-pole on a 1' high base with six (6) cellular antennas (I'X 8' high panels). The supporting equipment will be enclosed within an AT&T Wireless equipment shelter. The prefabricated enclosure will be enclosed within a retaining wall. Located at 44501 Rainbow Canyon Drive near the Temecula Creek Inn and adjacent to Interstate 15. DRC comments were issued on December 28, 2000, waiting for applicant to re-submit. Target Store - Planning Application to design and construct 6,627 square foot expansion that will provide additional stock room and retail space. Located at 29676 Rancho California Road in the Rancho California Town Center. Project has been approved and is in plan check. Rancho Community Church - Application to design, construct and operate a church and school campus on a 39-acre site. The overall proposal will include 279,957 square feet of religious and school facilities and a 477,449 four story parking structure. The site will be developed in a number of phases beginning with a 1,500 seat interim sanctuary with assembly room and a nursery; a four story, 42,716 square foot administration building, 15 modular classroom buildings, a 9,695 square foot preschool, a 300 seat, 5,656 square foot chapel, two field house buildings totaling 10,000 square feet, and lighted athletic fields. Future phases include permanent first through twelfth grade classroom facilities, a gymnasium, a 3,500 seat, 43,727 square foot worship center, and a parking structure. This project is located on the north side of State Highway 79 South east of Jedidiah Smith Road. DRC meeting was held on December 14, 2000, and staff is awaiting resubmittal. Margarita Medical Condo Development - A request to divide a 3.09 acre parcel into two (2) lots. Located on the southeast corner of Margarita and North General Kearny Roads. One of the two lots has a Development P~an proposal under review at this time, PA00-0417, for the development of a 12,319 square foot medical office complex capable of being conveded to medical office condo units. This is within Campos Verdes Specific Plan. This item went to DRC December 7, 2000. Planning Commission review is scheduled for March 28, 2001. La Paz Commercial Center - Planning Application to design and construct four office buildings ranging in size from 10,200 square feet to 11,500 square feet on approximately 3.76 acres of vacant land. Located at the corner of State Highway 79, La Paz Street, and Vallejo Avenue. DRC for this project was he~d on December 7, 2000. We are waiting for the applicant to resubmit. Overland Self-Storage - A Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan for the design, construction and operation of a 43,174 square foot mini-self storage facility with office, resident manager's quarters and R.V. storage spaces. Located approximately 155 feet north of the intersection of Commerce Center Drive and Overland Drive. This item went to DR(3 December 7,2000. This was approved by the Planning Commission on February 21,2001. R:\MONTHLY.RPT~2001\FEBRUARY 2001.doc 3 Temecula Valley RV - To gain feedback for future expansion of Temecula Valley RV. This expansion would include the following uses: RV sales and rentals, RV and Boat storage, and truck rentals. This project is located on Old Front Street south of the existing Temecula RV. Pre-application DRC was held on December 7, 2000. Applicant submitted CUP on March 2, 2001. Norm Reeves Acura - Planning Application to design and construct a new 7,675 square foot building, on approximately 2.0 acres of improved land along the "Ynez Corridor Car Dealership" area. The site requires demolition of asphalt and various curb and landscape areas. Located on the west side of Ynez Road, one lot north of the centerline intersection of Solana Road and Ynez Road. Applicant re-submitted on February 7, 2001. Sent incomplete letter for re-submittal on February 28, 2001. Norm Reeves Honda - Planning Application to renovate an existing 10,156 square foot building. Design and construct a new additional 10,156 square foot building, ultimately proposing a 20,795 square foot Honda Dealership on 2.63 acres of improved land along the "Ynez Corridor Car Dealership" area. Located on the west side of Ynez Road, one lot south of the centedine intersection of Solana Rd and Ynez Road. This project went to DRC on November 16, 2000. A DRC comment/incomplete letter was sent to the applicant November 27, 2000. Scott Electric Building - A 15,300 square foot industrial building on a 1.198-acre site located at 42142 Roick Drive. Located on the north side of Roick (third pad) east of Winchester Road. Approved at Planning Commission on February 21, 2001. Promenade Pad "H" Retail Buildings - To design, construct and operate a 14,200 square foot retail building for multiple tenants. South side of Winchester Road (State Highway 79 North), east of Ynez Road, on Outlot "H" along the Ring Road of the Promenade Mall. This was first seen as PR00-0019 in August. Second review received on December 20, 2000. Second comment letter send on January 25, 2001 and staff is awaiting re-submittal. Alpine Gardens East - Extension of Time for PA 97-0420 Located on the northwest corner of Loma Linda and Pala Roads. We are waiting for the applicant to resubmit. Tentative Parcel Map No. 29822 - Planning Application to subdivide 5.0 vacant acres of property within the Very Low Density Residential (VL) zone into 2 parcels. (2.5 net acres each). Located on Liefer Road. This project went to DRC on October 19, 2000. The Applicant is revising his proposat and has not resubmitted. Tentative Parcel Map No. 29949. The location is south east of Lolita Road and West of Calle De Velardo. Map was approved at Director's Hearing on March 8, 2001. Extended Stay America - To design and construct a 3 story building approximately 48,000 square feet (104 units) located on the northeast corner of Jefferson and Overland. Applicant has submitted CUP. DRC scheduled for February 8, 2001and comments were mailed; waiting for re-submittal. R:\MONTHLY.RPT~2.001~FEBRUARY 2001.doc 4 Sprint PCS Wireless Communication Facility - Design, construction and operation for a "stealth mono-pine pole 57' high at the Norma Marsha Rancho California Water District Tank Site on Margarita Road. This project went to DRC on July 27, 2000 and deemed complete on November 14, 2000. Itwas continued from the Planning Commission meeting on December 20, 2000 to the meeting on February 21, 2001. Approved at Planning Commission on February 21, 2001. Margarita Village South - An 8,700 square foot one-story office building; 10,000 square foot one-story office building; 20,000 square foot two-story office building; an 8,000 square foot restaurant; a 150 + room hotel; and a future 7,400 square foot office located at the northeast corner of Overland Drive and Margarita Road. The DRC meeting has been held and comments given to the applicant. We are awaiting resubmittal. Western Bypass Tract - A Tentative Tract Map 28473 to subdivide 39.94 acres of Light Industrial (LI) zoned properly into 13 lots. The property is accessible from Roick Drive west of Winchester Road. An initial study is underway and the project may be scheduled for Planning Commission in mid March. Hampton Inn Suites - Application to design, and construct a 4-story, 75-room hotel building approximately 41,100 square feet. Located on the northeast corner of Jefferson Avenue and Winchester Road Adjacent to the 1-15 off-ramp. DRC meeting was held on January 11,2001. Vail Ranch Center Phase Ill - Design and construct 3 new pad buildings for retail activity totaling approximately 25,000 square feet to include an 18,000 square foot Powerhouse Gym architecture design is approved and awaiting final landscape plans and grading pIan submittal prior to building permit issuance. Burger King with 380 square foot play center - -On State Highway 79 South, east of the Home Depot. Pre-application submitted on March 2, 2001. Temecula Radiator and Auto Repair- Development Plan application to design and construct a 20,000 square foot two-story automotive and RV repair facility on a 1.8 acre vacant parcel on Rancho Way between Diaz Road and Business Park Drive. The project was discussed at DRC on February 8, 2001 and is awaiting plan revisions. Hank's Hardware and Lumber Supply - Development Plan application to design and construct a 20,000 square foot two-story retail hardware and lumber supply building on 1.1 acre vacant parcel on Enterprise Circle South west of Jefferson Avenue and south of Winchester Road. The proposed project was discussed at the February 15, 2001 DRC meeting and is awaiting plan revisions. Intense Cycles, Inc. - Development Plan application to design and construct a new 13, 000 square foot bicycle manufacturing and distribution building on a vacant 1.25 acre parcel at the northwest corner of Ridge Park Drive and Vincent Moraga Drive. The proposed project will be discussed at the March 22, 2001 DRC meeting. R:\MONTHLY.RP~2001~FEBRUARY 2001.doc 5 Small Business Assistance Rhythm and Brews: Staff helped the owner of this proposed brewpub apply for redevelopment funds under the Fa~:ade Improvement Program to help him with construction of his firewall, ADA bathroom requirements and signs. The plumbing, electrical and mechanical and structural permits for this project have been issued and building inspections are progressing. An April opening is anticipated. M and M Art & Frame: Planning Staff worked with the designer of new signs for this business located in Old Town and helped him obtain approval from the Old Town Local Review Board and funding through the Faccade Improvement program. · Waves of Beauty: Helped owner of this existing business obtain approvals for signs at a new location in Old Town Temecula. · Old Tin Box: Met with owner regarding the design and approval of signs for this new business in Old Town. · X's and O's: Staff met with the owners of this new business in Old Town and helped them develop artwork and obtain approvals for new signs. · James Jewelers: Expedited the approval for a new sign for this business located in the Old Town Temecula Emporium Building. · Times of Our Lives Antiques: Staff helped the owners of this new Old Town business obtain approval and funding for signs through the Fa~;ade Improvement Program. Special Events Permits Rod Run 2001: Staff advised the Temecula Town Association regarding the preparation of a preliminary application and prepared site plans for this event held on February 17th and 18% Final organizational meetings were held with the applicant and all City departments involved. · Bluegrass Festival: In cooperation with the Redevelopment Department, staff is coordinating this Old Town event, which is planned for March 24th, and 25% Massage Establishment Permits · Tracy and Kelly's Massage: Accepted an application for this proposed business to be located at 30630 Rancho California Road, Suite F-502. Special Projects & Long Range Planninq Activities The Division also commits work efforts toward larger scale and longer time frame projects for both private and public purposes. These activities can range from a relatively simple ordinance or environmental review to a new specific plan or a general plan amendment. Some of the major special projects and long range planning activities are as follows: R:\MONTHLY.RPT~2001\FEBRUARY 2001.doc 6 Housing Element Update: The City has received the comments of the State Department of Housing and Community Development and is preparing the draft Element for the Planning Commission's consideration. · Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the City Redevelopment Plan: This activity is on hold pending the update of a General Plan Circulation Analysis. Comprehensive General Plan Update: The consultant selection committee has recommended that Cotton Bridges & Associates be hired for this project. Staff is in the process of working with the General Plan Subcommittee to finalize the scope of work. The contract was presented to the Council in March. Traditional Neighborhood Development Ordinance: Final changes are being made prior to scheduling this item for a Planning Commission workshop in the fall of 2000. This item is on hold pending additional staff resources. Vail Ranch Annexation: LAFCO approved the annexation on November 16, 2000. City Council conducted a protest hearing and approved rates and charges on February 13, 2001, no protests were received. Staff is coordinating with the County for the transfer of services by July 1,2001. Surface Mining Ordinance: The staff and City Attorney had been making final changes based upon feedback from the State prior to submitting this item to the Council for their consideration. This item is on hold pending additional staff resources. Application Fee Study: Staff has provided information to the consultant and Finance Department about changes to our current fee schedule and is currently awaiting revised information. Hillside Development Policy: The policies are being examined for integration into the draft- grading ordinance. This item is on hold pending additional staff resources. Multi-species Habitat Conservation Planning Efforts for Western Riverside County: Councilman Naggar and Planning Staff are attending committee meetings and monitoring the process of determining conservation reserve needs. Comments regarding these meetings are presented during Council Business on the last meeting of the month. City Council comments have been provided to the County on the project alternatives. Large Family Day Care Home Facility Ordinance: The Planning Commission considered this Ordinance amendment at their February 2, 2000 meeting. In the review process targeted for the April 4, 2001 Planning Commission meeting. · Citywide Sign Inventory: The process of inventorying signs is pending additional staff resources. County Project Reviews: Staff continues to allocate significant resources to review projects within the County and other local jurisdictions that could affect the City of Temecula. Information regarding these projects will be forwarded under separate cover labeled Projects of Concern. · Helium Balloon Ordinance Amendment: Scheduled for March 28. 2001 Planning Commission meeting. R:\MONTHLY.RPT~2001\FEBRUARY 2001,doc 7 General Plan Annual Report: The City Council approved the report on February 13, 2001. Staff is currently preparing a submittal to the State Department of Housing and Community Development. Southside Specific Plan: This item is on hold pending additional staff resources. Development Code Amendment: Is currently being developed by staff and will include reconsideration of the current compact parking space requirements. General Plan Amendments · Rancho Highlands Drive. Awaiting City Council hearing date. A request to reduce the size of Via Industria (Western Bypass Corridor) north of Avenida AIvarado has been submitted and has been on hold pending the approval of a revised Circulation Element. Geographic Information System (GIS) Activities In light of performance issues relating to Fire Department's MaxResponder routing and pre-plan system Staff has simultaneously begun testing an alternative program from Plant Equipment. Testing of these programs will lead to the ultimate implementation of a GIS based routing and pre-pIan system on all Fire response units. Live testing on the mobile fire units using both competing systems is currently underway. Recent mapping products include: CIP location maps for Finance Department Banner location map for City Manager/Public Works Vacant land map for City Manager CFD 88-12 map for Finance Department Street name sign replacement map for Public Works Vicinity, zoning and land use maps for Planning Conflict of Interest map for Commissioner Chiniaeff Old Town vicinity maps for Redevelopment Signal location maps for Public Works Interconnect Infrastructures map for Public Works Commercial property status map for Council Member Indian lands location map for Planning Sphere of Influence map for Fire Department Vicinity aerial map for Assistant City Manager Vail Ranch Annexation median maintenance map for TCSD Vicinity map for Human Resources Webpage map request f~r Planning Rod Run map for Fire/Planning Departments · Staff continues with ongoing data layer development and maintenance. R:\MONTHLY.RPT~2001\FEBRUARY 2001.doc 8