HomeMy WebLinkAbout081192 CC AgendaAGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER - 28816 PUJOL STREET
AUGUST 11, 1992 - 7:00 PM
EXECUTIVE SESSION: 5:30 PM -'Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) -
City of Temecula vs U.S.' Border PatrOl and 54956.9 {b) and (c)
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will
determine which of the remaining ·agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00
PM and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting.
All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER:
Invocation
Flag Salute
ROLL CALL:
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 92-14
Resolution: No. 92-63
Mayor Patricia H. Birdsall presiding
Pastor James Field - First Baptist Church
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans
Lindemans, Moore, Mur~oz, Parks, Birdsall
1992 Recycling Achievement Award
PUBLIC FORUM
This is a portion of the City Council meeting unique to the City of Temecula. At the
meeting held on the second Tuesday of each month, the City Council will devote a
period of time (not to exceed 30 minutes) for the purpose of providing the public with
an opportunity to discuss topics of interest with the Council. The members of the City
Council will respond to questions and may give direction to City staff. The Council is
prohibited, by the provisions of the Brown Act, from taking any official action on any
matter which is not on the agenda. If you desire to speak on any matter which is not
listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with
the City Clerk.
2/agendd081192 1 08/06/92
/I
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
CONSENT CALENDAR
2
Standard Ordinance Adoorion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of the meeting of July 14, 1992.
3
Resolution Aoorovino List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
21,gendW0811 ~2 2 08/04/g2
4
6
Public Nuisance Abatement - 28613 Pujol Street
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Approve the issuance of a purchase order in the amount of $17,725 to
Hunt Wrecking for the removal of all vehicles and scrap metals.
4.2 Approve the issuance of a purchase order in the amount of $14,845 to
Environmental Recovery Services for the hazardous material removal.
4.3 Appropriate $32,570 for Other Outside Services from Unreserved Fund
Balance.
Continuation of Resolution Establishing Buildinq Valuation and Miscellaneous Fee
Schedules
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Continue consideration of this item off calendar to allow adequate time
for a resolution to be achieved.
Amended Condition of ADoroved Tentative Tract Mao No. 23209
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve the amendment to Condition No. 33.
7
Award of Professional Engineerina Services Contract for an Interchanqe Study on I-15
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
The joint Temecula/Murrieta Transportation Committee recommends that
the City Council award a contract for Professional Engineer Services to
NBS/Lowry' of San Diego for an amount not to exceed $15,000 to
conduct an Interchange Study on I-15 North of Winchester Road;
7.2
Authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
Renewal of Annual Street Maintenance Contract FY 92-93
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
Extend the Street Maintenance Contract as amended with Ramtek
Contractors, Inc. of Temecula for a period of one year (June 30, 1993);
8.2
Authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
21aOende/081192 3 08/04/82
9
10
Award of Contract for Construction of Street Imorovements on Sixth Street Between
Front Street and Mercedes - PW 92-02
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1
Award a contract for construction of street and sidewalk improvements
on Sixth Street (Project PW 92-02) to Ramtek Contractors, Inc., for
$41,326.30, and authorize the Mayor to executive said contract.
9.2
Transfer $45,458.93 from the Development Impact Fund to the Capital
Projects Fund and appropriate $45,458.93 (bid amount plus 10% to
allow for possible change orders) to Capital Projects Account No. 021 o
165-623-5804.
Award of Professional Services Contract to Leic~hton and Associates for Geotechnical
Services on Sixth Street Project (PW 92-02)
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1
Award a professional services contract in the amount of $3,038.00 to
Leighton and Associates for Geotechnical Services on the Sixth Street
project (PW 92-02) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said
contract.
10.2
Transfer $3,038.00 from the Development Impact Fund and appropriate
$3,038.00 to the Capital Projects Account No. 021-165-623-5804.
11
Award of Professional Services Contract to Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates
for Survey Services on Sixth Street (PW 92-02)
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1
Award a professional services contract in the amount of $4,625.00 to
Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates (RBF) for survey services on
Sixth Street improvements (Project No. PW 92-02), and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign said contract.
11.2
Transfer $4,625.00 from the Development Impact Fund to the Capital
Projects Account and appropriate $4,625.00 to Capital Projects Account
No. 021-165-623-5804.
2legenddOS1182 4 08/O4/12
12
13
14
15
Acceotance of Public Improvements in Tract No. 21764
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1
12.2
12.3
12.4
12.5
Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 21764;
Authorize the reduction of Faithful Performance Sewer System Bond and
release of the Subdivision Monumentation Bond;
Accept the Faithful Performance Maintenance Rider;
Approve the Subdivision Agreement Rider;
Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors.
Release a Portion of Faithful Performance Bonds and Material and Labor Bonds in
Parcel MaD No. 23496
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1
Authorize the release of a portion of the Street/Drainage Faithful
Performance Bonds and Labor and Material Bonds in Parcel Map No.
23496;
13.2
Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety.
Release Faithful Performance Securities and Material and Labor Securities in Parcel Mao
No. 23354
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1
Authorize the release of Street/Drainage and Sewer and Water System
Faithful Performance Letters of Credit, and Material and Labor Letters of
Credit in Parcel Map No. 23354;
14.2
Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors.
Release of Material and Labor Bonds in Parcel MaD No. 23561-1
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1
Authorize the release of Material and Labor Bonds in Parcel Map No.
23561-1;
15.2
Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors.
2legendNOB11 e2 6 08/04/~2
16
Release of Material and Labor Bonds in Parcel MaD No. 23561-2
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Authorize the release of Material and Labor Bonds in Parcel Map No.
23561-2;
16.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the
approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences
delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.
17
18
2legendNOB1
Vestina Tentative Tract MaD 25320 and Change of Zone 5631
(Continued from the meeting of June 23, 1993)
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Continue the public hearing to the meeting of August 25, 1992.
Ordinance Regulatina TemPorary Sians
RECOMMENDATION:
18ol Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 92-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 348 PERTAINING TO THE
REGULATION OF TEMPORARY SIGNS
18.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING A FEE FOR THE PROCESSING OF PERMITS FOR TEMPORARY
SIGNS
6 08/04/12
19
19.1
COUNCIL BUSINESS
20
21
Final Listincj of PotentialIv Hazardous BuildinQs
RECOMMENDATION:
Continue the public hearing to the meeting of September 22, 1992.
Temecula/Murrieta Transoortation Committee
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1 Provide direction to the Temecula/Murrieta Transportation Committee
regarding their specific mission.
Discussion of Combinine Traffic and Transoortation and Public Safety Commissions
(Requested by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans)
22
Aooointment to Parks and Recreation Commission
RECOMMENDATION:
22.1 This report will be forwarded to you under separate cover.
23
24
25
EmerQencv Manaeement Procjram Presentation
RECOMMENDATION:
23.1 Receive and file.
Memorandum of Understandine Reeardinq Paloma Del Sol
RECOMMENDATION:
24.1 Approve the attached Amended Memorandum of
("MOU") regarding Paloma del Sol.
Consideration of Chamber of Commerce Contract Service A{~reement
(Continued from the meeting of July 14, 1992)
RECOMMENDATION:
25.1
Understanding
Consider the Chamber of Commerce request for funding in the amount
of $46,000.00.
21aOendd081192 7 08/06/82
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: August 25, 1992, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol
Street, Temecula, California
21egenclNO811 e2 8 08/04/82
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING - (To be held at 8:00)
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
PUBLIC COMMENT:
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Minutes
President Ronald J. Parks
DIRECTORS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should
present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state
your name and address for the record.
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of the meeting of August 11, 1992.
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Dixon
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT:
Next regular. meeting August 25, 1992, 8:00 PM, Temecula
Community 'Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
21eOertdNO61192 9 08/04/92
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson J. Sal Mu~oz presiding
ROLL CALL:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Parks,
Mur~oz
PUBLIC COMMENT:
AGENCY BUSINESS
I Minutes
Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a
completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you
are called to speak, please come forward and state your name
and address for the record.
RECOMMENDATION:
1.2
Approve the minutes of the meeting of July 14, 1992.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting August 25, 1992, 8:00 PM, Temecula
Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
2legendNOB 1192 I 0 08~4,12
PRESENTATIONS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA--THE RESOURCES AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION
DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY
DIVISION OF OIL AND GAS
DIVISION OF RECYCLING
PETE WILSON. Gover,'~or
Phone: (916) 323-0050
FAX: (916) 323-4907
TalecommunicaTions Device
for the Deaf: (916) 324-2555
July 15, 1992
City of Temecula
Mr. Joseph P. Mreha
Solid Waste Manager
43174 BuSiness Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Dear Mr. Hreha:
Congratulations! The California Department of Conservation
and the Beverage Container Recycling Advisory Committee are
pleased to announce that you have been named as the first place
winner in the Public Sector Category for the 1992 Recycling
Achievement Awards competition.
We present this Award to you to recognize the superior
caliber of your contribution to the recycling of beverage
containers, thus reducing the waste stream and supporting the
conservation of California's resources.
Again, our congratulations on receiving a Recycling
Achievement Award. We look forward to meeting you and
acknowledging your achievements at the Awards Luncheon.
Sincerely,
Edward G. Heidig
Director
Department of Conservation
EGH/PW:ec
Sincerely,
Peter T. Whited
Chairman
Beverage Container Recycling
Advisory Committee
Enclosures
Department of Conservation
Beverage Container Recycling Advisory Committee
AWARDS
FIRST PLACE AWARD WINNERS
MERIT AWARD WINNERS
Individual
Jerrie Bullerwell
Education
Hemet Unified School District
Public Sector
City of Temecula
Private Sector
Placentia Lind~ Hospital
Community / Nonprofit
Recycling Partnership for Schools & Businesses
Pltb l~ / Private JobIt F~ort
Councilwoman Beverly Barnard
& Michael Sch~_ukowi1~h, Manager,
San Bnmo Garbage Company
Individual (tie)
Jeannette Scovill
Tom Wheeler
Education
Hyampom Elementary School
Public Sector
City of Chula Vista
Private Sector
Cal Sierra Recycling
Community / Nonprofit
Heartland Opportunity Center
Publit / Pri~ate Joint Effort
Garden Grove Santtixy District &
Taormina Industries
SPECIAL RECOGNITION
S. Jack Hermes, Jr. A ward
Grass Valley Recycling
SELECT COMMITTEES
CHAIRMAN
PLANNING FOR
CALIFORNIA'S GROWTH
fNFANT AND CHILD CARE
AND DEVELOPMENT
SOURCE REDUCTION AND
RECYCLING MARKET
DEVELOPMENT
6a[ifornia t, tate enate
MARIAN BeRGESON
SENATOR
THIRTY-SEVENTH DISTRICT
CHAIRMAN
LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE
STANDING :OMM 'TEE~
CHAiRMA,%
LOCA~ GOVERNMEN'
Ai:~ROPRIAT~ON5
JUly 28, 1992
City Of Temecula
Mr. Joseph P. Hreha
Solid Waste Manager
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Dear Mr. Hreha,
Congratulations on being named by the California Department
of Conservation and the Beverage Container Recycling Advisory
Committee as the first place winner in the Public Sector Cat-
egory for the 1992 Recycling Achievement Awards Competition.
Temecula deserves the award for its outstanding efforts in
recycling, especially in its Integrated Waste Management
Program. The city impressively diverted 52 percent of
residential waste, 33 percent of commercial waste, and 37
percent of overall city-wide waste; Temecula has definitely
proven itself worthy of this recycling honor.
Again, I congratulate Temecula for supporting the conserva-
tion of California's limited resources through efforts in
recycling.
Cordially,
Marian Bergeson
Senator, 371h District
MB:Jh
CARTOL OFFICE
ORANGE COUNTY
WESTERN RIVERSIDE/
NORTHEASTERN SAN DIEGO COUNTIES
STATE CARTOL SACRAMENTO. CA 958M
140 NEffPORT CENTER DRIVE. SUITE 120. NE'WIBORT BEACH. CA 92680
27403 YNEiZ ROAD. SUITE 217. TEMECULA, CA 923~0
TELEFt'lONE: {9~6} 445-4981
TELEPHONE: {714) 840-1137
TELEPHONE: (7Mr 676-8808
ITEM
1
ITEM
2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD JULY 14, 1992
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:02 PM in the
Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Pro Tem Karel
Lindemans presiding.
PRESENT 4
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz,
Parks
ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, Assistant City Attorney John Cavanaugh,
and City Clerk June S. Greek.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Associate Minister John Larkam, World Harvest Outreach
Church.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the pledge of allegiance by Councilmember Parks.
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans announced that Mayor Birdsall was ill and would not be attending.
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
None given.
PUBLIC FORUM
Mark Draper, 825 East Street, Suite 2328, San Diego, representing La Resistencia, spoke
regarding the recent incident involving a pursuit by the Border Patrol and asked for the
removal of the Border Patrol in all cities.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Mu~oz requested the removal of Items 6, 7 and 13 from the Consent Calendar
for further discussion.
Minutes\7% 14\92 - 1 - 07/20/92
City Council Minutes July 14, 1992
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Moore to approve
Consent Calendar Items 1-5, 8-12, 14 and 15.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall
Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
1.1
Minutes
2.1
2.2
2.3
Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Approve the minutes of June 17, 1992.
Approve the minutes of June 23, 1992.
Approve the minutes of June 24, 1992.
Resolution ADDroving LiSt Of Demands
3.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-57
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
City Treasurer's Report as of May 31, 1992
4.1 Receive and file report.
Minute$~7~l 4\92 -2- 07/20192
City Council Minutes July 14, 1992
Resolution Establishing Permanent Gann Appropriation Limit and Submittal to the
Voters at the November 3.1992 General Election
5.1
Adopt the following resolutions entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-58
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, GIVING
NOTICE OF THE SUBMISSION TO THE VOTERS OF A QUESTION RELATING
TO THE APPROPRIATION LIMIT OF THE CITY, TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE
GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3,
1992
RESOLUTION NO. 92-59
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, SETTING
PRIORITIES FOR FILING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS REGARDING A CITY
MEASURE AND DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN
IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS
10.
RESOLUTION NO. 92-60
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS FOR CITY
MEASURES SUBMITTED AT MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS
Authorization for Bid Proposals - Street StriDing and Legend Paintinq
8.1
Authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit bids for the annual
street striping and street legend painting contract.
Authorization for Bid Proposals - Street Name SiQns and Traffic Siqns
9.1
Authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit bids for the
acquisition of street name signs and traffic signs.
Release Labor and Material Bonds - Tract No. 23128
10.1
Authorize the release of street, water and sewer system material and
labor bonds in Tract No. 23128;
10.2
Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors.
Minutes\7~l 4\92 -3- 07~20~92
City Council Minutes
11.
12.
July 14. 1992
ADOrOval Of Final Tract MaD No. 22761
11.1 Approve Final Tract Map No. 22761, subject to the Conditions of
Approval.
Aooroval of Final Tract MaD No. 22762
12.1 Approve Final Tract Map No. 22762, subject to the Conditions of
Approval.
14.
15.
Contract Change Orders - PW 91-03 Rancho California Road Benefit District
14.1
Approve Contract Change Orders consisting of:
A $828.30 increase in contract amount due to removal of signal
controller base and installation of at-grade foundation for new controller.
A $700 increase in contract amount for raising seven (7) water valves
located after excavation started.
A $1,423.80 increase in contract amount due to reconstruction of one
(1) manhole to be removed down to shaft and reconstructed per Public
Works Standard Specifications.
A $1,257.50 increase in contract due to additional equipment and
unusual work conditions required to make slope grade due to Southern
California Edison's moving two additional poles located within right-of-
way.
Advance $4,209.60 from the Development Impact Fund to the
Reimbursement District Fund and appropriate $4,209.60 to Account No.
011-165-605-44-5804.
Adoption of Personnel Resolution
15.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-61
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING POSITIONS AND SALARY RANGES
Minutes\7\14\92 -4- 07120t92
City Council Minutes Julv 14. 1992
6. Contract Aqreement for Street Numberina
Councilmember Mu~oz asked if $20 an hour is a competitive rate for this type of
service.
Chief Building Official Tony Elmo stated the rate is below the norm being paid in other
areas. He explained this is a service which establishes street address numbering prior
to the development process based on a complex grid system, and is not physical
numbering of existing development.
It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Councilmember Moore to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
6.1
Approve a contract agreement with Bruce Stewart to renew existing
contract to provide address numbering services on an as-needed basis.
The motion was unanimously carried, with Mayor Birdsall absent.
Award of Contract for Audio-Video Services
Councilmember Mu~oz questioned why the term of the agreement is only one year.
Senior Management Analyst Grant Yates responded that the total term of the contract
is four years and explained the reason for annual review is to solve problems that may
occur and to allow the contractor the opportunity to add equipment as needed.
It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Councilmember Moore to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
7.1
Award a contract to Davlin to provide audio-video services for City
Council and Planning Commission meetings.
The motion was unanimously carried, with Mayor Birdsall absent.
13.
ADoroval of Purchase -Citv Mobile Radio System
Councilmember Mu~oz asked if the City Council should be included in this system,
facilitating communication between Council and staff during an emergency.
City Manager Dixon responded that these units will primarily be installed in vehicles,
with one base unit. He explained that communication during an emergency is done by
telephone and when phone systems are down, cellular phones are used. He suggested
that the 800 Megahertz radio system be approved and expanded uses explored.
Minutes%7%14%92 -5- 07120192
City Council Minutes July 14. 1992
Councilmember Moore explained, that although this system can be used in the event
of an emergency, the primary function is to communicate with employees in the field.
Councilmember Parks stated this is another tool for running the day to day operations
of the City that could be used as part of an emergency system. He requested that
staff bring the Emergency Plan to the Council in two weeks so that a better
understanding of the functions of Council and staff can be gained.
It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Councilmember Moore to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
13.1
Approve the purchase of an 800 Megahertz (MHZ) radio system.
13.2
Appropriate $29,671 from Unreserved Fund Balance.
The motion was unanimously carried, with Mayor Birdsall absent.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
16.
ADoeal No. 24 (AODeal Of Plannina Commission Denial of Plot Plan No. 8839, Revised
No. 1, Amended No. 2)
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans stated he would abstain from this item since his wife owns
a beauty shop in Old Town and he feels it may be a conflict of interest. He turned the
meeting over to Councilmember Mu~oz and excused himself.
Councilmember Mu~oz stated his wife also operates a business in Old Town and asked
the City Attorney if this presents a conflict. Assistant City Attorney John Cavanaugh,
after determining that Mrs. Mu~oz is operating a business as a lessee and does not
own the property ruled that no conflict exists.
Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report.
Councilmember Mu~oz opened the public hearing at 7:31 PM.
Lance Garrett, First Fidelity Thrift and Loan, the current title owners of the property,
concurred with staff recommendations and agreed to the additional conditions of
approval.
Councilmember Mu~oz closed the public hearing at 7:34 PM.
Minutes~7~14\92 -6- 07120/92
City Council Minutes
July 14. 1992
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Moore to approve
staff recommendation as follows:
16.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-62
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING APPEAL NO. 24, THEREBY APPROVING PLOT PLAN NO. 9939,
REVISED NO. 1, AMENDED NO. 2, CHANGING USES ON THE SECOND FLOOR
FROM 5,413 SQUARE FEET OF STORAGE TO 3,600 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE
SPACE AND 1,813 SQUARE FEET OF STORAGE ON PROPERTY KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 922-024-027
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Moore, Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans
Mayor Pro Tern Lindemans reioined the meeting and reassumed the chair at 7:35 PM.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
17. Consideration of Chamber of Commerce Contract Services Agreement - FY 1992-1993
City Manager Dixon presented the staff report.
Bill Bopf, 41707 Winchester Road, Ste. 301, President of the Temecula Valley
Chamber of Commerce, spoke in favor of the proposed agreement stating he is pleased
with the arrangement between the City of Temecula and the Chamber of Commerce
and hopes to be able to continue providing needed services.
Mayor Pro Tern Lindemans asked that this item be continued for two weeks in order
to obtain a full financial statement from the Chamber of Commerce.
Mr. Bopf stated that under the previous contract quarterly reports were submitted to
the Finance Department, however he did not have a problem with providing the City
with a full financial statement.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Mu~oz to
continue this item to the meeting of July 28, 1992. The motion was unanimously
carried with Mayor Birdsall absent.
Mi nutes~7\ 14\92
-7- O7/20/92
./
City Council Minutes July 14, 1992
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans asked that this matter be reviewed by the Finance
Committee.
18.
Develoomental Services Efficiency RePort - City Manaaer's Blue Ribbon Committee
City Manager Dixon presented the staff report and thanked the Committee, consisting
of a professional facilitator, Ron Smith, and six committee members, Bill Bopf, Larry
Markham, Dave Olson, Max Gilliss, Tom Griffin and Tom Langley, for a job well done.
He reported the committee came up with 21 findings and recommendations and their
report is submitted as a receive and file item for Council and public information.
Bill Bopf, 41707 Winchester Road, Ste. 301, Chairman of the Blue Ribbon Committee,
commended the City Manager and staff for embarking on this process. He stated the
committee received excellent cooperation from the Planning, Building & Safety and
Engineering Departments, who are all dedicated professionals and he was pleased to
work on this committee.
Councilmember Parks asked Mr. Bopf if he ,feels comfortable the City is committed to
moving forward to facilitate this program. Mr. Bopf stated he believes staff is willing
but they need support from the Council on hardware and programs.
City Manager Dixon stated that staff has already begun to implement these
suggestions.
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans suggested that the City have an ombudsman to assist
developers and citizens who come to the front desk. He requested that an addition to
Item 19 of the report be made, outlining requirements of all other agencies, such as
the School District, Flood Control District, Water District, etc.
City Manager Dixon stated he feels the Committee's work should stand on its own,
however he would be happy to bring back other items for Council action at another
time.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Moore to publicly
extend appreciation to the Blue Ribbon Committee members and receive and file the
report. The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Birdsall absent.
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans presented Mr. Bopf with certificates of appreciation for
each of the members of the Blue Ribbon Committee and thanked them for their
outstanding service and a job well done.
RECESS
Minutes\7%14%92
-8-
07/20/92
CiW Council Minutes
July 14, 1992
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans called a recess at 8:01 PM. The meeting was reconvened
following the Community Services District Meeting and the Redevelopment Agency Meeting
at 8:21 PM.
19.
ADoointments to Plannine Commission
Councilmember Parks presented a report out ~ng the ~d Hoc Committee
recommendations. He stated the Committee felt it is ~t~'B'e'St ihterest of the City to
reappoint existing Planning Commissioners, Billie Blair and Steven Ford.
Councilmember Mufioz concurred with Councilmember Parks and stated the City is in
the process of developing the general plan and the consistency and experienced
provided by the current Commissioners will benefit the City.
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
reappoint Commissioners Billie Blair end Steven Ford to a three year term of office.
The motion was unanimously carried, with Mayor Birdsall absent.
The City Clerk was directed to notify Commissioners Blair and Ford of their
reappointment.
20. License Agreement with Temeka Advertisina for "Kiosk" Sign Program
Chief Building Official Tony Elmo presented the staff report.
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans asked how removal or abandonment of signs will be
handled, in the event a company goes bankrupt. Mr. Elmo recommended adding a
provision to the agreement requiring a performance bond, which would protect the City
in the event the signs are abandoned. Staff was directed to include such a provision.
Joan C. Tussing, 28165 Front Street, spoke in opposition to the award of an
agreement to Temeka Advertising, stating she was not given the opportunity to bid on
this project.
David Cowan, 5731 Good Karma Lane, Bonita, Vice President of Marketing for
Motivational Systems, Inc., spoke in opposition to staff recommendation and requested
the matter be returned to staff. He stated he feels the rules changed during the
process and a local firm was given preferential treatment. He presented a written
statement to members of the City Council and staff.
Councilmember Mu~oz asked Mr. Elmo to address the allegations that the rules
changed during the qualification process. Mr. Elmo explained there was an incorrect
statement made during a pre-conference meeting that was brought to staff's attention
by Mr. Cowen and staff met with Mr. Cowen to resolve these issues immediately.
Mi nutes\7\ 14\92 -9- 07120/92
City Council Minutes July 14. 1992
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans asked if this event will be featured in any national
magazines. Mr. McDonald stated he could not make a commitment, however the
press has been invited and have shown interest in the event.
George Campoe, President of the Friends of the French Valley Airport, stated that he
feels by virtue of the speakers invited, the press will be present. He stated this is an
important area event and the City will gain valuable exposure.
Sydney Vernon, 30268 Mercey Court, spoke against the use of public funds for this
event.
Marsha Slavin, 30110 La Primevera St., spoke against the expenditure and asked if the
County and surrounding cities have also been asked to contribute.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Moore to
authorize an expenditure of $7,000 for promotion of the French Valley Aviation Center
Dedication Ceremony.
Councilmember Mu~oz stated that although he feels this is an important event, it is not
appropriate to fund through the use of public funds, especially since the French Valley
Airport is outside the City limits.
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans stated he feels that a full service airport will attract
companies who need facilities, and thus create jobs. He stated ads in trade magazines
are very expensive and this kind of coverage would cost substantially more than
$7,000.
Councilmember Parks stated that this event will generate sales tax and transient
occupancy tax revenues. He added that Temecula ranks number two in the County
in sales tax revenue as a result of these types of events.
The motion was carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Lindemans, Moore, Parks, Birdsall
NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz
ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
City Manager Dixon announced that the City is the proud winner of the first place award in
the Public Sector Category for 1992 Recycling Achievement, and was recognized as having
the best recycling program in the State.
Minuteg\7\l 4\92 -11 - O7120/92
City Council Minutes July 14. 1992
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
None given.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Parks stated he will not be at the closed session tomorrow due to an
orientation meeting of SCAG (Southern California Association of Government).
Councilmember Mu~oz reported that the transit system within the City is doing well with a
ridership of 1,600 passengers per month and reported he is encouraging the RTA Board to
convert the two vehicles dedicated to the City of Temecula to propane.
Councilmember Mu~oz requested that staff contact the press and encourage them to be
present at City Council Meetings.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Councilmember Moore to adjourn at
9:54 PM to an Executive Session on July 15, 1992, 12:00 noon, Temecula City Hall,
pursuant to 54956.9(a) City of Temecula vs U.S. Border Patrol and 4956.9 (b) and (c). The
motion was unanimously carried, with Mayor Birdsall absent.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Mi nutes\7\ 14\92 - 12- 07120/92
ITEM NO.
3
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN
CLMMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN
EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TE1VIECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been
audited by the City Manager, and that the same axe hereby allowed in the mount of
$3,347,597.93.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 1 lth day of August, 1992.
ATTEST:
Palrida H. Birdsall, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SSAL]
3/Resos 269
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OP RIVERSIDE)
CITY OF TEMECULA )
SS
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. 92- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the llth day of August, 1992 by the following roll call vote.
AYES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
June S. Greek, City Clerk
3/R~sos 269 ~'~
07/10/92 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
07/13/92 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
07/16/92 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
07/24/92 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
07/28/92 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
07/30/92 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
0811 1/92 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
08/11/92 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
07/16/92 TOTAL PAYROLL:
07/30/92 TOTAL PAYROLL:
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
$11.878, 18
$16,423.96
$1,106,824,09
$76,810.53
$578,997.42
$123,878.86
$1,064,875.39
$189,611.12
$92,346.61
$85,951.97
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 811 1/92 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001
100
110
140
160
190
193
210
250
300
310
320
330
GENERAL
GAS TAX FUND
RANCHO CALIF. RD. REIMB.
COMMUNITY DEVE, BLK. GRANT (CDBG)
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TCSD
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CAPITAL PROJECTS (TCSD)
INSURANCE FUND
VEHICLE FUND
INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS
COPY CENTER FUND
PAYROLL:
300
3~
330
GENERAL (PAYROLL)
GAS TAX FUND (PAYROLL)
TCSD (PAYROLL)
INSURANCE FUND (PAYROLL)
INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PAYROLL)
COPY CENTER FUND (PAYROLL)
$1,626,34.4.83
$21,285.98
$1,054,066.16
$65,475.70
$737.05
$83,055.74
$8,782.47
$652.28
$.4,267.,40
$3,858.97
$108,081.26
$20,769.88
$43,847.55
$1,115.64
$1,999.52
$2,484.73
$3,347,5~7.93
TOTAL BY FUND:
PREPARED BY KARMA MCINTYRE
'DAVID~D~I ON, CITY dlANAGER
,HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
$~,347,5~7.~
CHEKREG2
DATE 07/10/92
DATE
VOID
VOID
VOID
07/10/92
07110192
0711019Z
07/10/92
07/10/92
07110192
07110192
07/10/92
07110192
07110192
15:38
CHECK #
11076
11077
11078
11076
11077
11078
1101~
11080
11081
11082
11083
1108~
11085
VEND #
000210
000380
000392
000393
00039/,
000395
000396
000397
000398
000399
CITY OF TENECULA
CHECK REGISTER
NANE
ALIGNNENT
ALIGNNENT
ALIGNlENT
LEAGUE OF CALIF.CIT]ES
LAIDLAg TRANSIT
FAIRNONT HOTEL
CALIFORNIA ASSOC, OF PARKS
NAINTEEANCE SUPERINTENDENTS
ECONONIC DEVELOPRENT CORP.
ANERICAN PUBLIC gORKS
SAN DIEGO ZOO
CALIFORNIA NUNICIPAL
NUN[C[PAL NANAGENENT ASSIST,
TOTAL CHECKS
PAGE 1
ANOUNT
178.00
405.00
264.00
190.00
90.00
10,000.00
150.00
542.25
26.9]
40.00
11,878,18
REDEMPTION DATE
FUND
001
0'91
190
t90
CHECK-DATE
07/10/92
07/10/92
07/10/92
07/10/92
07/10/92
07/10/92
07/10/92
07/10/92
07/10/92
CHECK-NO
#ll080
#ll081
#11082
~ll08~
#11085
#11076
f11077
#11078
#11079
#11083
CITY OF TEMECULA
CHECKS BY F'LJI~D
VENDOR-NAME
MAINTENAI4CE SUPERINTENDEN
ECOHOMIC DEVELOF~qENT CORP
AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASS
CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL
MUNICIPAL MANAGEMENT ASSI
LEAGUE OF CALXF.CITIES
LAIDLAW TRAHSIT
WAIRMONT HOTEL
CALIPORNIA ASSOC. OF PARK
SAN DIEGO ZOO
DESCRIPTION
_
WORKSHOP/8/O6/92/DS~JH
TWO CORP. PLATINUM MEMBER
WORKSHOP/OS/26/92/TS,DS~A
lc~2 TREASURERS HANDBOOK
NEETING/7/la/92/MJH~GY
FUND 001 TOTAL:
CON[ERENCE/JULY 24/E HARK
TRANSPORTATION/ZOO
HOTEL RESERV./COHF. 8/a-8
AN~4UAL DUES
DAY CAMP TRIP ZOO
FUHD 190 TOTAL:
AMOUNT
90.00
10000.00
150.00
26.95
40.00
I050&.95
170.00
405.00
264.00
190.00
542.25
1571.25
TOTAL:
$11,878.18
CHEKREG2,
DATE 07115192
DATE
VOID
VOID
VOID
07113192
0711319Z
07113192
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
08:06
CHECK #
11087
11088
11089
11090
11091
11092
11093
11094
11095
11096
11097
11098
11099
11100
11101
11102
11103
11104
11105
11106
11107
11108
11109
11110
11111
11112
VEND #
000127
000165
000177
000184
000209
000218
000224
000227
000228
000235
000261
000262
000277
000291
000300
000353
000357
000360
000362
000374
000~00
000402
CITY OF TENECULA
CHECK REGISTER
HAlRE
CALIFORNIAN
FEDERAL EXPRESS
GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCTS
GTE
L & N FERTILIZER
HARILYN'S COFFEE SERVICE
NELAD & ASSOCIATES
HISCO, INC.
HOBIL
OCB REPROGRAPHICS
RANCHO BLUEPRINT
RINCHO T~TER
S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS
SPEEDY OIL CHANGE
STUART, FRANKLIN C.
TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE
RIVERSIDE, COUNTY AUDITOR CONT
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRAMS. DEPT.
GREEK, HAROLD F.
RCOREOUEZ, JOHN
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
ALEXANDER HANILTON INSTITUTE
BERG, HARK
PAGE 1
AHOJNT
424.74
15.25
267.05
2,183.72
29.71
81.07
90.00
555.41
695.90
19.50
~6,76
4,197.07
550.T5
22.49
420.00
61,31
10.00
81.00
465.00
10.00
4,554.85
104.20
36.56
REDEMPTION DATE
CHEKREG2
DATE 07/15/92
DATE
08:06
CHECK #
VEND #
CITY OF TENECULA
CHECK REGISTER
NAHE
PAGE 2
ANOUNT
REDEMPTION DATE
07/13192
07/13192
07/13192
07113192
11113
11116
11115
11116
000603
000605
SHAkIN SCOTT POOL & SPA
RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT
Sl4ITH, PHILLIP
VILLAGES HOeeEO~NERS ASSOCIATIO
TOTAL CHECKS
853,00
328.64
20.00
300.00
16,623.96
=UND
~01
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
901
001
~01
001
190
190
190
Ic~O
190
190'
190
LgO
:90
'-90
190
LgO
190
: qO
1 ~0
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/1~c9,2
07/13/92
07/13/;2
07/13/~2
07115/92
07/13/92
07t13/~2
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/13/~2
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/A3/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
07113192
07/%5/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
071%3/92
07/13/92
07/15/~2
O~Y/13/gZ
07115192
07/13/92
07/15/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
07/13/92
CHECK-NO
11090
11090
110q0 ......
11091
11092
%..'z.0;2---- .......
11094
11095
1109~
11097
11098
11104
1L107
11109
11111
11112
11114
11115
%1098
11100
11101
11101
11101
11101
11101
1110~
11101
11101
11101
11101
11t0"1--
11101
%1101
11101
~1'--1~1
11101
11101
11102
11103
CiTY OF TE,k!.ECULA
CHECKS 9Y rUr~D
VENDOR-NArIE DESCR I PT I ON ~PIOUNT
CALIFORNIAN ADVERTISING FOR 4/05/92
CALIFORNIAN ADVERTISING FOR 05/03192 159.00
CALIFORNIAN ......... ADVERTISING FOR ~/25/92 - ;2.52
FEDERAL EXPRESS FACKAGING/EX-ffiAILING 15,2~
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS CR ~EffiO 10=07b-0 7.71-
GLENN IES--O~E--~RODUCT~ OI:gICE SUPPLIES ................... 274.7~ -
GTE SERVICE 5/2b-~/22 2183.72
L & ffi FERTILIZER RAZORBACK SHOVEL S248
~-& M--~ER~I~I~ER ..... RETURN (PUSH BUTTON) .............. 2,8~ ....
~ARILYN'S COFFEE SERVICE COFFEE SUPPLIES 5/2& 51,07
fiELAD & ASSOCIATES PLAN CHECKING SERVICES &/ 90,00
~tSCO,--~, CERT,-T~PE/TAFE STORAGE ........ ---555,41 .....
~OBZL FUEL CHARGES FOR HAY 92
STUART, FRANKLIN C. PRO SERVICES/JUNE
-- ~t~ERS{DE.-COUN~Y---TRANS-v-D .... SIGNALS/LIGHTING.FrAY-92
RODREGUEZ~ JOHN JUNE %COO ~EETING
ALEXANDER H~ffiZLTON INSTIT VIDEO
BCR6%---PkO, R4( CONFERENCEI~II8192
RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT LIGHT BOX
SffiITH$ PHILLIP ZGRO DINNER/5/21-b/18
FUND 001 TOTAL:
494.57
420. O0
10.00
104.20
328. b4
20, O0
~0BIL
RANCH0 BLUEPRINT
RAiMCHb-bN~TER
RANCH0 WATER
RANCH0 WATER
RANCt-K},-4dATER
RANCHO WATER
RANCHO WATER
RANCHC)-teATER
RANCHO WATER
RANCH(:3 WATER
RANCH0--%iATER
RANr"H0 ~ATER
RANCHO HATER
RANCH0'*~TER~
RANCH0 WATER
RANCHO ~ATER
RANCH0 ~TER
RANCH~T~
R~NCH0 ~ATER
RANCH0 H~TER
R~NCHO~TER~ --~
S & S ~RTS ~ND CR~;TS
S~EEDY OiL CHANGE
FUEL CHARGES FOR flAY 92
CLEAR ACETATE
---01--04-14511--0 .... 3f10-5t
01-04-14511-0 4/05-5/
01-04-12000-2 3/10-4/
01--04--/2000-2 -4/08-5Y
01-0b-27200-5 4/10-5/
01-0b-27200-5 3/12-4/
--01--0b-27900-2~/12--4/1
01-0/-27q00-2 4/10-5
01-08-001~1-1 3/lb-4/
201.33
'~4,80
34.03
-- Be ~ Be-- ---
7b,73
40,94
-- 2e ,-t4----
102,37
51.29
01--08--00151--1 ..... 4/14--5/ ..... 2~9~--.-
01-13-20200-2 411b-~/ 1771,09
01-13-20200-2 3/18-411 87,4e
..... 01-~5-03010-1 .... 4/21-5/
01-15-030%0-1 3/23-4/ b4.49
01-18-Ob43-1 3/23-4/2
01-1e-05/43-1 .... 4/21--5/-- .... ----/,~-~24------*
01-24-01;18-1 4/24-~/ 273.69
01-24-01918-1 3/25-4/ 98,72
01-24-4b000-~----4/24-5/ ........... 470.2& ....
OI-24-56OO0-1/3/25-4/24 256.08
01-24-4/~00-1 3/2~-4/ 63.94
01-24-46500-1 - --4t24-5/ ......... 149.58---
PTISC. ART SUPPLIES 350.73
O'-L CHANGE 8280137 22.49
;UND
lgO
190
190
190
1'~0
1%'~
· P-~TY 0r TEME'.ULA
CHECKS BY ;UND
CHECK-DATE
07/15/92
07115192
O7/15/92
07/15/92
07/15/92
07/15/92
07115192
07/15/92
07/15/~2
07/13/92
07/15/~2
07/15/~2
07/15/92
07/1~/~2
07/15/92
07/~'-~/~2
07115/92
0711~192
0711~192
CHECK-NO
--'-11105- -*
11105
11105
11108
11110
--lb110--
11110
11110
111-10
11110
11110
11110
11110
11110
11110
11110
1~110-----
11110
11110
11110
11110
11110
11110
11110
11110
I1110
11110
1111b
VENDOR-NAME
TEMECULA VALLEY--P~RE ........
TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE
TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE
R/VERSIDE.oCOUN~Y-AUDITOR --
GREEK. HAROLD
SOUTHERN CALI~ EDISON
SOUTHERN *CA~*oIg.-EDt-SON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN-CALIF----EDI~ON
SOUTHERN CALIr EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIr EDI~
SOUTHERN~*I~DI~
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHE~ CALIF EDISON
~THERN~A~IF E~IS~
SOUTHERN CALIF EDI~
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALXF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
--SOUTHERN--GAL-I~-C-4)t~C~
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CAL!F EDISON
SOUTHERN--~I~D[~
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTMERN C~LXF EDISON
----S~T~R~IF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
SUPPLIES FOR TCSD ..... 5.71
SUPPLIES TCSD 24.21
SUPPLIES FOR TCSD ~1.39
CORRECT. SPEC. ASSESSMENT I0.00
CONSULTANT FEES LAND PLAN 4&5,00
5~-77-813-0153-02 223,52
53-77-813-O153-O2 ......... 237,8~ -
53-77-815-0153-02 241.03
53-77-813-O153-O2 21b.bO
....... 55-77-813-O153-02 ........... 235,15 -
53-77-813-0153-02 218.!9
53-77-813-0153-02-000-7 212.14
.53-77-813-0153-02.--
53-77-850-0090-02 167.74
53-77-850-0090-02 161,09
5,,~-1-7-850-0090-02 --185,57--.
53-77-850-0090-02 18b.b5
53-77-8~0-0090-02 181.20
· 53-..-7~-e50-0090-02 l;5.,-e~ -
53-77-B50-0090-02
53-77-850-O090-02 189,14
--bb-77-584-BObT-02 --- --251~-50---
bb-77-584-8071-02 101.0~
bb-77-585-0900-02 190,88
.... bb--77-795--b98b-03 ................ 175,15-.
bb-7?-?95-b990-04 58.94
bb-77-795-8462-03 4~,11
bb-77--795-9913-02 -- 212,51--
b7-77-863-9414-02 229,05
bg-77-bTB-0107-02 11.20
SHA~N-SCCTT ~'-er-~PA----POO~-SERVXCE/SU~PL-IES-~UN -853,OO---
VILLAGES HOMEOWNERS ASSOC PLANT MATERIAL 500.00
FUND-190 TOTAL:'
...... 11262,54--
11C~ ........ OCB-REPROGR~;H-}CS
--PRINTIN6 COSTS ........ 19,50 .....
FUND 250 TOTAL: 19,50
............. TOT~: $16.~23.9~
CHEKREG2
DATE 07/16/92
DATE
07/08/92
07/08/92
07/09/92
07/09/92
07/13/92
07/16/92
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
16:55
CHECK #
11068
11070
11071
11072
11086
11117
11161
11162
11163
11164
11165
111/,6
11167
11168
11169
11150
11151
11152
11153
11156
11155
11156
11157
11158
11159
11160
VEND #
000268
000119
000322
000210
000373
000116
000127
000130
000163
CITY OF TEMECULA
CHECK REGISTER
NAHE
RXV. CO. HABITAT CONSERVATION
BENEFIT AHERICA
UN[GLOOE BUTTERFIELD TRAVEL
LEAGUE OF CALIF.CITIES
SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK
ADVERT/SING & PRC)I4OTZON
ALXGNI, ENT CHECKS
ALIGW4ENT CHECKS
ALIGNHENT CHECKS
ALIGN!4ENT CHECKS
FATE, LYNNE
FULLER, JOYCE
GRXECO, SHEILA
LOVE, GARY
NADINE NETH
BENSON, LORI
~ER, TANYA
DABKER, LARRY
GENERAL SERVICES, PUBLICATIONS
ROSS, ALANA
ANTHONY, SHELLEY
FILANC, JANES
AT & T
CALIFORNIAN
CANYON REPROGRAPHZC$
COPY LINE CORPORATION
PAGE 1
AHOUNT
1,755.00
2,990.31
178.00
650.00
1,050,800.00
25.00
215.00
27.00
130.00
27.00
265.00
36.00
197.50
18.00
13Q.QO
27. OQ
80.QO
591.80
217.96
106.90
REDEMPTION DATE
CHEKREG2
DATE 07/16/92
DATE
16:55
CHECK #
VEND #
CITY OF TEHECULA
CHECK REGISTER
NANE
PAGE 2
ANOUNT
REDEMPTION DATE
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
11161
11162
11163
11164,
11165
11166
11167
11168
11169
11170
11171
11172
11173
11174
11175
11176
11177
11178
11179
11180
11181
11182
11183
1118,6,
11185
11186
0001~.
000180
000184
000186
000193
000210
000214
000219
000235
000249
000250
000253
000254
000261
000269
000270
000275
000283
000291
000308
000322
000332
000342
000374
000375
000390
COSTCO gNOLESALE
GRAY BAR ELECTRZC
GTE
HANKS NARDgA. RE
lClM
LEAGUE OF CALIF.CITIES
LUNCH & STUFF CATERING
HARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO
OCB REPROCRAPHZCS
PETTY CASH
PHOTO TROPHY
POSTMASTER
PRESS ENTERPRZSE
RANCHO BLUEPRINT
R/VERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RJH DESION GROUP
ROMERO, LUCI
SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK
SPEEDY OIL CHANGE
TEMECULA TME ASSOCIATION
UNIGLO~E BUTTERFIELD TRAVEL
VANDORPE CHOUASSOCIATION
gINDSOR PARTNERS - RANCHO IND.
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHONE CO
LAt~ON FAMILY PUPPETS
170.00
289.29
178./,4
5.00
10.77
109.50
89.80
145.47
562.59
215.50
93.65
761
197.82
250.95
5,206.50
47.88
743.87
22.
180.00
138.00
318.58
28,527.11
606.31
59.14
285.00
CHEICREG2
DATE 07/16/92
DATE
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16192
07/16/92
07/16/92
16:55
CHECK #
11187
11188
11189
11190
11191
11192
11193
11194
11195
000391
000~12
000613
00061/,
000615
0004.16
0004.17
0004.18
000A19
CiTY OF TENECULA
CHECK REGISTER
BANE
DUBS iNCORPORATED
k~ZLLIAII$, KAY
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
LONGS DRUG STORE
NORTH COUNTY BASKETBALL
FRIENDS OF FRENCH VALLEY
ACTS, iNC.
RiVERSiDE' COUNTY CLERK
DPP PUBLiCATiONS
TOTAL CHECKS
PAGE 3
ANOUNT
84~5.93
160.1)0
290.00
23.56
69.00
7,Q(X).O0
36.00
75.00
23.05
1,106,824.Q9
REDEMPTION DATE
;UND
,)0 '-
001
nn ~
O0t
OO1
O~ ,
001
O01
OC 1
OO].
001
001
001
001
001
001
O01
001
001
001
001
001
00!
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
OO-1
CMEChzS BY FUND
CHECK-DATE
CHECK-NO VENDOR-NAHE
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
07/0B/92
07/0t/92
07/09/92
07/09/92
07/1&/92
07/1~/92
O7/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
0~/Ii/92
07/16/92
07/16192
07/16/92
07/16/92
07111192
07/16/92
07/16/92
gTIlklq2
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/161~2
07/16/92
07/1~/92
07/16/92
07/1~/92
07/16/9t
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07t16t~2
07/16/92
07/18/92
07/18/92
07/~6/92
].106B RIV. C0, HABITAT CDNSERV~
~1070 ........... BENEFIT AMERICA
11071 UNIGLDBE BUTTERFIELD TRAV
11072 LEAGUE OF CALIF,CITIES
~ t 07.?~.. LEAGUE. OF. CALIF, r'TZI.ES
11117
1115'$
.~.s.657' ....... _.._,A"r ,f.,
K--~T FOR 3UNE 92 17~5,O0
HEDZCAL REI~ 6/'$0192 2447,6T
TICKETS/CONSULTANT/TRAFFI ~7S,00
SEHINAR/OULY 1~ 510,00
SEfiINAR/JULY 1; ...... ~40,00 __
LUNCHEON/SEffilNAR 25.00
199; PLANNZNS,ZONING AND IS.DO
71~694~989/JUNE.-92
NOTICE OF EXPIR, 5/19792 198,60
NOTICE OF 0RDIN, 6/30/92 19,36
___.ZONE_HAP~ 49,05
CITY LIBITS flAP 2.54
BLUEPRINTS
SERVICE CALL RICOHI6/11/9 90.00
SEN, RACHINE ~IRING 120,61
GENERAL_CABLE-INSIOE-44IRI
714695~5~9/b12~-7124
7146~90128/b/~2-7/2~ 112,24
3146~230~/--b/25-7/2~--
~ZSC, PURCHASES 178.44
1115G CALIFORNIAN
11158 CALIFORNIAN
~ rANYDN_RE~R05RAP/:I~CS--
11159 CANYON REPROORAPHICS
11159 CANYON REPRO~RAPHZCS
111~9----- C~NY, ON_REPRQr,~iAEH2,CS--
11180 COPY LINE CORPORATION
11162 GRAY BAR ELECTRIC
~11,.&2 GRAY,--BJ~R--E~Ere.TRIC
111&3 GTE
1116'$
11164 HANKS HARDWARE
11165 , ICRA SHIPPING FEE FOR LITERATU 5,00
1~--- LE~GUE-0F-CAL.IF-,CI:;ES---~P~NUAL FOR PLANNERS .... 10_7.7~.
11167 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING LUNCH FOR PURCHASING TRAI
11167 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING EXECUTIVE SESSION/LUNCHED 66,00
1114~8---- ~ART~IN._I_HOURjHOTO __DEVELOP-FILM-&-PURQ4ASES-
11170 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH JUNE 92 '$56.31
11171 PHOTO TROPHY FRAHES 215,50
11~,7~ PGSTRAST-ER -CITY HANAGER-- --
11172 POSTRASTER PLANNING 19.95
11172 POSTRASTER NON DEFT 49,80
1~1~2- POSTRASTER--- FINANCE ....... -- 9.95 --
1117'$ PRESS ENTERPRISE ADVERTZSING/ACCT 119395
11174 RANCHO BLUEPRINT PLAN PRINTS 197,82
~1~175 .......... RIVERSIDE-OFFiCE--SUPPLY .... TONER, XEROX ......... -250,95-..
11177 ROMERe, LUCI ORAL BOARD LUNCHES 5/20-b 47,88
11178 SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL 4798 0200 0001 0773 2~,50
1117G ........ SECURITY-PACIFIC NATIONAL- 47~8 0200 0001 0856 ......... 459o19-
11170 SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL 479B 020~0001 0G64 2~0,00
1117B SECUR/TY PACIFIC NATIONAL 479B 0200 0001 4262
11~79 .SPEEDY-OIb-CH~d~GE ........ /BUILDING & SA~ ..... 22,49
11180 TEffiECULA T(~INE ASSOCIATIO JUNE RENT
11181 UNIGLOBE GUTTERFIELD TRAV CREDIT
~182 ......... VN~DORPE *CHOU ASSOCIATION ..... PLAN CHECK SERV. JUNE 199-
11183 blINDSDR PARTNERS - RANCH0 JULY 92 RENT
11185 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHONE 714-'$45-741;/JUNE SERV,
~LCG7 ........ DUBS-INCORPORATED-- VVl5 VHS 15s00 DUB
11192 FRIENDS OF FRENCH VALLEY COUNCIL ACTION
~1195 ACTS, INC. FINANCIAL TAPES
---1~19A RIVERSIDE COUNTY-CLER~ .... FILING FEES
180.00
5'$0.00-
.... 318.58
28527.11
59.14
845.9~-
7000.00
'$6.00
25,00
FUND
001
001
140
lb0
lb0
190
190
190
190
190
190
lc~0
190
190
190
190
1c~0
190
190
1"~0
190
190
---.-i?O
190
190
190
lcPO
250
CHECK-DATE
07/lb/92
07/lb/92
07116192
07116/92
07/16/92
07108192
07/1&/92
0711k192
0711~192
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/lb/92
07/16/92
07/IL/92
07/16/92
07/16/V2
07/IL/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07116192
07/1&/92
07/1~/92
o7/Lc/~2
07/16/92
07/1~/92
07/16/c~2
07/16/92
074~i,~2
CITY OF TEMECULA
CHECKS BY FUND
CHECK-NO
11194
11195
VENDOR-NAME DESCRIPTION
RIVERSIDE CO~H~TTC'~K FILi~G"~EES
DPP PUBLICATIONS HANDBOOK/PLANNERS
FUND 001 TOTAL:
AMOUNT
25,00
25,05
$45,800.
11194
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CLERK
FILING FEES 25.00
...... FUND.140-TOTAL= .. 25,00
11086
111S1
11191
IECUR,T~Y_~EZ,C.-NATIDNRL----PROPERTY PURCHASE/SAM HIt'. .... lOSO80O,.OO.
UNIGLOBE BUTTERFIELD TRAV CONFERENCE/MONTEREY 460,00
UNISLOBE IUTTERFIELD TRAV CONFERENCE/AUG, 6-7 1992 208,00
FUND 160 TOTAL= 10;1468,00'
11070
11145
16146--
11146
11147'
11149
11150
11152
11154
11161
11170
1117~
11~84--
11194
11194
BENEFIT N,'~RICA
Z;]:LANC, ,.TAESS
COSTCO te63t,ESALE
MEDICAl, REIM b130192 542.64
REFUND KINDER GYM 3~.00
REFJJND_DAY--CAMP 107, 50.
REFUND/DAYCAMP 107,50
REFUND KIDS IN RHYTHEM 27,00
--REFUND/.2ND SUrIMER-DAY* CA ......... 130,O0-
REFUND KIDS IN RHYTHEffi 27,00
REFUND DAY CAMP
REFUND KINDER GYM*-
REFUND I i II SEES, CAMP 197.50
REFUND FOR SECOND SESSION 1~0,00
REFUND/KIDS-IN RHYTHM_ -- 27cOO"-
REFUND/LATIN DAN~E SO,O0
SNACKS FOR DAY CAMP 170o00
GTE ....... 3146990128/6/22-?121 .......... 131'50-
PETTY CASH PETTY CASH OUNE 92 206,28
PRESS ENTERPRISE ADVERTISING ACCT 3690 524,16
SOUTHERN-.CALIK-EDZSON .... 51-77-905-0101-02-000-3 34,05-
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 51-77-905-0812-000-3 10,b0
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 51-77-905-5796-02-000-2 10,~0
11-184 .......... SOUTHERN-CALIF-EDZSON .... S3-77-850-9301-01 ............ 167,19
11184 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON bb-77-795-6988-05 158,70
11184 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 69-77-678-1651-02 225.17
11-1~-- -LA~SON-FI~t-ZLrY-R. U PPETS _ _ ENTERTAINMENT/- DAYC~hkIP] .......... 2BS,O0
111BB klILLIAMS, KAY SO~ CONTRACT CLASS/MODELI 1~0.00
11190 LONGS DRUG STORE FIL~ DEVELOPING 23,5/
13rl-91.-- --NORTH-CQI.,NT~-BASKETBALL ..... ASSIGNMENT-FEE/FORFEITS ....... iS,00*
FUND 190 TOTAL= 3888.95
OCB REPROGRAPHICS PRINT COST DESIGN SPORTS 61,42
OCS REPROGRAPHICS .... RANCHO CAL SPORTS PARK ..... S4,05
11169
---
FUND
250
CHECK-DATE
07/lb/92
0711bl92
CITY OF TEMECULA
CHECKS BY FUND
CHECK-NO VENDOR-NAME
~7~ ............ ~'D".'~;~ GROU.
11176 R~H DESIGN GROUP
11.1B9 STATE-OF--CALIFORNIA---
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
..... ;ERI= ENDINS ~;~9: =~'.'~C
PERIOD ENDING 5/31/92 lqO0.OC
_~_ PERMIT TCSD ............ 290.0C
FUND 250 TOTAL: 5641.q'
~OTA~: $i, 106,824.
CHEKREG2
DATE 07121,192
DATE
07/17/92
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOiD
VOID
VOID
VOID
07/10/92
07/2~/92
07126192
07/26/92
07124192
07/26192
07/26/92
07/24/92
07/26/92
07/26192
07/26/92
07/26/92
11:08
CHECK #
11205
11208
11209
11210
11211
11212
11213
11214
6266~1
11215
11216
11217
11218
11219
11220
11221
11222
1122)
11224
11225
11226
11227
11228
11229
11230
11231
VEND #
0001/4
00028,)
000119
000126
000132
0001~6
000167
000173
000180
080186
000220
0002~
000267
000262
000266
CITY OF TEHECULA
CHECK REGISTER
NANE
COSTCO UHOLESALE
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK
WIEK, WILLIAH
HOTEL OUEEN HARY
SILVERSTONE, PAUL
LEOliE, THERESA
&
BENEFIT AHERICA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CASH REGISTER SYSTEMS
COUNTS UNLIMITED
FIRST IHPRESSIONS.
GENERAL BINDING
GRAY BAR ELECTRIC
HANKS NARDWARE
HAURICE PRINTERS QUICK PRINT
PERS EHPLOYEES' RETIREHENT
PESTRASTER SERVICE
RANCHO MATER
RIGHTI4AY
PAGE 1
N4OUNT
804.78
18,135.36
100.00
198.00
2,338.50
7.00
2,76~.80
632.50
~50.00
87~. 02
257.71
217.92
713.31
27,728,20
140.00
2,7~.19
401.72
REDEMPTION DATE
CHEKREG2
DATE 07/26/92
DATE
07/24/92
07/26/92
07/24/92
07/26/92
07/26/92
07/26/92
07/26/92
07/26/92
07/26/92
07/24/92
07/26/92
07/26/92
~07/24/92
07/24192
07/26/92
07/26/92
07/26/92
07/24/92
07/26/92
11:08
CHECK #
11232
11233
11234
11235
11236
11237
112,.~8
11239
11240
11241
11262
11243
112z. t,
11265
11266
11247
11248
11249
11250
VEND #
000269
000280
000283
000305
000327
000374
000375
000380
000389
000409
000411
000418
000428
000429
000430
000431
000~2
000433
000~35
CITY OF TENECULA
CHECK REGISTER
NAHE
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
SC SIGNS
SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK
TARGET STONE
UliUH LIFE INS CO OF ANERICA
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHONE CO
LAIDLAW TRANSIT
USCH
VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CLERK
HORIZON HATER
CHESHER, RUTH
GROUP AMERICA
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, INC.
ROLLER CITY 2001
ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL DATA
ELWO00, JEFF
TOTAL CHECKS
PAGE 2
AHOJNT
/,62.28
90.00
72.16
60.00
2.076.13
58.72
1,330.87
337.01
2,220.89
592.55
6,282.00
25.00
51.50
162.19
2,100.00
739.50
210.00
120.00
29.00
76,810.53
REDEMPTION DATE
FUND
,eee
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
· 001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
CHECK DATE
07/2~/92
07/2~/92
07/2~/92
07/2~/92
07/2~/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07124192
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/10/92
07/10/92
CHECK NO.
,,,eeemee
11216
11217
11217
11219
11221
11221
11221
11222
11225
11225
11227
11228
11228
11228
11228
11228
11229
112~2
11232
11232
11232
11232
11232
11232
11233
1123~
11236
11238
11238
11238
11238
11238
11238
11238
11238
11240
11240
11240
11240
11240
11240
11240
11240
11241
11243
112~6
11246
11247
624681
62/,681
CITY OF TEHECULA
CHECKS BY FUND
VENDOR NANE
HOTEL QUEEN HARY
SILVERSTONE, PAUL
SILVERSTONE, PAUL
BENEFIT ANERICA
CASH REGISTER SYSTEMS
CASH REGISTER SYSTEMS
CASH REGISTER SYSTENS
COUNTS UNLINITED
GRAY BAR ELECTRIC
GRAY BAR ELECTRIC
NAURICE PRINTERS ~UICK PR
PERS ENPLOYEES' RETIREHEN
PERS EI~LOYEEB' RETIREMEN
PERS EHPLOYEES' RETIREHEN
PERS ENPLOTEES' RETIREHEN
PERS EliPLOYEES' RETIREHEN
PESTHASTER SERVICE
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
SC SIGNS
SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL
SECURITY ,PACIFIC NATIONAL
UNUN LIFE INS CO OF AMERI
SUUTHERN CALIF TELEPHONE
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHONE
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHONE
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHONE
SOUTHERN CALI F TELEPHONE
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHONE
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHONE
SOUTHERN CALI F TELEPHONE
USC~
USCM
USCH
USCH
USCM
USCH
USCM
USON
VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CLERK
GROUP AMERICA
GROUP ANERICA
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, I
SECURITY PAC]FIC NATIONAL
SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL
DESCRIPTION ANOUNT
BUD, RESOURCE REC, CONFER 198,00
REFUND/75~ OF PLANNING FE
REFUND/75X OF PLANNING FE
INSURANCE PREM. 7/15/92 R
RIBBON
LABOR HOURS
1/2 HOUR TRAVEL;CHARGED F
TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION
CABLE/INSIDE glRING
RETURNED ALLEN TEL
CANDIDATE ~UIUAL COVERS
PAYENT FOR PAYROLL 7/02/
PAYROLL OVER PULL
000246 PER REDE
000246 PERS RET
000246 SURVIROR
NONTHLY NAIN. JUNE 92
HIll 7672; FAX TRANSIIITTAL
SlID 243BE (T/252)
SlID 2~3CI (77253)
sl¢ 243R (77259)
S11) 243Y (77261)
SIC 243L (77243)
SALES TAX 7,75~
POSTING SC FOR PUBLIC HEA
NIBC. CHARGES JUNE 92
NISC, CHARGES JUNE 92
INSUI~NCE PREN. JULY ~2
714287/,8/,0/JUNE 92
714J~56005/JUNE 92
714::~57421/JUNE 92
714:~57421/NAY 92
714:~57425/JUNE 92
71434~44::$6/JUNE ~2
71434Pj4~8/JUNE 92
714:~f~39/JUNE 92
P/T RETIR PAYMENT 7/2-7/1
PIT RET[R PAYNENT 712-711
PIT RETIR PAYNENT 712-711
PIT RETZR PAYPENT 712-711
PIT RETZR PAYNENT 7/2-7/1
PIT RETIR PAYlENT 7/2-7/1
000389 PT RET]R
INDUSTRIAL CAL KIT
FEE/NOTICE DETER, PLAN 11
AUG, 92 PRENIUN
AUG, 92 PREMIUN
INS, PREN, AUG, 92
000283 F]CA/NED
000283 USIT
FUND 001 TOTAL:
1,928.25
410.25
1,8]0.03
12.50
390. O0
30.00
950.00
1,349.82
1,092.11-
713.31
11,107.74
1.00-
42.94
9,237.09
39.~.1
140.00
5.00
0.~
0.~
0.~
0.~
0.~
0,78
45.00
7.71
64.45
1,338.55
148.99
354.26
188.06
155.45
61.32
62.26
43.53
18.88
97.20
120.00
83
20~, 02
3~4.42
592.55
25.00
1,382.67
255
4.85,92
2,050.14
9,724.97
45,357.91
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
CHECK DATE
07/26/92
07124192
07/26/92
07126192
07/26/92
07/24/92
07126192
07/10/92
07/24192
07/26/92
07/24192
07/26/92
07126192
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/26/92
07/26/92
07/26/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07124192
07124192
07/26/92
07126192
07/24/9Z
07126192
07126192
07126192
07126192
07/24/92
07126192
07124192
07126192
07126192
07126192
07124192
07126192
07126192
07126192
07126192
07126192
07/24/92
07/24/92
07124192
07/24/92
CHECK NO.
11228
11228
11228
11260
11242
11247
626681
626681
11215
11218
11219
11219
11220
11220
11220
11223
11226
11228
11228
11228
11230
11230
11230
11230
11230
11230
11230
11230
11230
11230
11230
11230
11230
11230
11231
11231
11231
11233
11235
11236
11237
11237
11237
11237
11237
11238
CITY OF TEHECULA
CHECKS BY FUND
VENDOR NANE
PERS ENPLOYEE$' RETIRElIEN
PER$ EMPLOYEES# RETIREHEN
PER$ ENPLOYEE$' RET]RENEN
UNUN LIFE INS CO OF ANERI
USCN
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOO CO
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, [
SECURITY PACIFIC RATIONAL
SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL
WIEK, WILLIAM
LEONE, THERESA
BENEFIT ANERICA
BENEFIT ANERICA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
FIRST ]NPRE$$ION$
RANKS HARDgARE
PERS EHPLOYEES' RETIREHEN
PERS ENPLOYEES' RETIREHEN
PERS ENPLOYEES' RETIREHEN
RANCHO WATER
RANCHO UATER
RANCHO WATER
RANCHO WATER
RANCNO WATER
RAMClIO HATER
RANCND HATER
RANCliO WATER
RANCHO HATER
RANCHO HATER
RANCHO HATER
RAMCHO WATER
RANClIO HATER
RANCNO HATER
R I GHTHAY
R I GHTVAY
R I GHTWAY
SC SIGNS
TARGET STORE
UNUN LIFE INS CO OF ANERI
SOUTHERN CALIF BISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHONE
DESCRIPTION ANOUNT
000266 PER REDE 171.76
000246 PERS RET 1,953.34
000266 $URVIROR 7.67
INSIJIIANCE PREN. JULY 92 262.95
000389 PT RETIR 38.23
PERMIT FEE 6#282.00
INS. PREM. AUG. 92 7Z,45
000283 FICA/MED 622.99
000283 USIT 2,398.01
FUND 100 TOTAL: 11,609.40
REISSUE LOST CHECK/ASSES 100.00
REFUND $UIq4ER BEACH TRIP 7,00
INSURANCE PREH. 7/15/92 R 15.39-
INSURANCE PREM. 7/15/92 R 949.16
WINCHESTER CREEK: REPAIR 139.80
SJM)DLEM301) SLOPE: REPAIR 27.9~
kOCOCREST COUNTRY: REPAIR 27.00
SUIIER DAYCARP T-SHIRTS 879.02
PAY INVOICES FOR JUNE 92 217.92
PAYNENT FOR PAYROLL 7/02/ 2,517,91
0002~6 PERS RET 2,163.41
000246 SURVIROR 12.29
0111700012/05/18-06/16/9 82.84
0111700022/05/18-06/16/9 86,78
0111700032/05/18-06/16/9 37.97
0111700092/05/18-06/16 150.76
0111702502/05/18-06/16/9 276.k7
0111706051/05/18-06/16/9 73.60
0115001012/05/21/06/18/9 346.02
0124000022/05/27-06/24/9 354.02
0124000152/05/27-06/26/9 78.58
0124006002/05/27-06/24/9 82.95
0124007322/05/27-06/26/9 74.11
0126025001/05/27-06/24 560.44
0131170052/05/27-06/24/9 197.60
0131215012/05127-06126 31~.05
1 PORTABLE TOILET; VET. P 57.39
4 PORTABLE TOILETS; SPORT 229.55
2 PORTABLE TOILETS; SAN H 114.78
POSTING SC FOR PUBLIC HEA 45,00
SUPPLIES FOR DAY CANP 60.00
INSURANCE PREH. JULY 92 3~9.13
208-366940/06101-0710219 11.80
208-366957/06/01-07/02/9 11.92
308-517677/06/02-07/01/9 11.10
308-517678/06/0Z-07/01/9 11.10
85-768549/06/03-07/06/92 12.80
7142874994/JUNE 92 45.24
FUND
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
193
193
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
CHECK DATE
07/24/92
07124192
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/10/92
07110192
07/24192
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24/92
07/24192
07/24/92
07/24192
07/24192
07/10192
07/10/92
07/24192
07/24192
07/24192
07/24192
07/24/92
07/24192
07124192
07/17/92
07/10/92
07110/92
CHECK NO.
11238
112~8
11238
11239
11240
11240
112~,
11245
11246
11247
11248
624681
624661
11220
11220
11220
11220
11220
11228
11228
11236
112A6
11247
62A~81
11228
11228
11236
11236
11246
11249
11250
11205
620581
624661
CITY OF TEHECULA
CHECKS BY FUND
VENDOR NAHE
SOUTHERN PALiF TELEPHONE
SOUTHERN PALIF TELEPHONE
$OIJTNERN PALIF TELEPHONE
LAIDLAM TRANSIT
USCN
US(34
HORIZON MATER
CHESHER, RUTH
GROUP AHERZPA
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, I
ROLLER CITY 2001
SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL
SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL
PALl FONNIA LANDSCAPE
CALl FORNIA LANDSCAPE
PALl FORNIA LANDSC~E
CALl FORNIA LANDSCAPE
PALl FORNIA LANDSCAPE
PERS EHPLOYEES' RETIRBEH
PERS EHPLOYEES' RETIREHEN
UNUH LIFE INS CO OF MIERI
GROUP AHERIPA
RATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, I
SECURITY PACIFIC RATIONAL
SECURITY PACIFIC RATIONAL
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREHEN
PER$ EHPLOYEES' RETIREHEN
UNUN LIFE IHS CO OF ARERI
UNUH LIFE INS CO OF AIIERI
GRCUPAHERIPA
ASSOCIATION OF NUNICIPAL
ELMOOD, JEFF
COSTCOgHOLESALE
SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL
SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL
DESCRIPTION ANCUHT
7142924020/JUNE 92 42.24
7143~57418/JUNE 92 77.12
7147458550/JUNE 92 68.50
BUS FOR DAY CARP TRIP 337.01
P/T RETIR PAYMENT 7/2-7/1 391.12
000389 PT RETIR 800.40
6/10 & 6/24, JULY CHG. 51.50
RE/MB. CRAFT SUPPLIES 162.19
AUG. 92 PREM/UH 381.02
INS. PREN. AUG. 92 157.50
DAYCAMP TRIP 210.00
000283 FICA/MED 745.60
000283 USZT 2,358.7~
FUND 190 TOTAL: 16,565.04
IRRIGATION REPAIR ON CITY
IRRIGATION REPAIR; EgO J2
IRRIGATION REPAIR; EgO
IRRIGATION REPAIR; EgO al2
IRRIGATION REPAIR; EgO ~/2
FUND 19~ TOTAL:
~0.00
382.70
141.40
75.15
47.80
737.05
000246 PERS RET
000246 SURVIROR
/NSURANCE PREM. JULY 92
AUG, 92 PREMIUM
INS. PREN. AUG. 92
000283 FZPA/MED
000283 USIT
FUND 300 TOTAL:
92.26
0.45
14.73
14.06
7.88
19,19
59.02
207.59
000246 PERS RET
000246 SURVIROR
INSURANCE PREN. JULY 92
INSURANCE PREH. JULY 92
AUG. 92PREMION
MEMBERSHIP DUES
SOFTMMIE REG. FOR TCSD
TONER SUPPLIES
000283 FIPA/HED
000283 USIT
FUND 320 TOTAL:
183.21
0.93
29.27
31.50
27.98
120.00
29.00
80~.78
37.30
208.34
1,472.31
CITY OF TENECULA
CHECKS BY FUND
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
CHECK DATE
07/24/92
07124192
07124192
0712~192
07124192
0712~192
0712~192
07124192
0712~192
07/24/92
07124192
07124192
07124192
0?124192
0712~192
0712~192
0712~192
07/10/92
07110192
CHECK NO.
11224
11224
11224
11224
11224
11224
11228
11228
11~2
1192
112~2
1192
112~2
112~2
112~2
11~2
112~
112~7
&2~1
&2~1
VENDOR MANE
.........................
GENERAL BINDING
GENERAL BINDING
GENERAL BINDING
GENERAL BINDING
GENERAL BINDING
GENERAL BINDING
PERS ENPLOYEES' RETIREHEN
PER$ ENPLOYEES' RETIREHEN
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERS[DE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
GROUP ANERICA
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, I
SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL
SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL
DESCRIPTION ANOUNT
7/8 BLUE SPIRAL BINDINGS 10.30
7/16 BLACK SPIRAL BINDING 13.20
5/16 BLACK SPIRAL BINDING 3.80
5/8 BLACK SPIRAL BINDINGS 7.40
SALES TAX 7.7~X
FREIGHT 7.00
0002/,6 PERS RET 197.23
0002/,6 SURVIROR 1.86
8 1/2 X 11 WHITE PAPER 152.80
8 1/2 X 14 WHITE PAPER 25.92
11X 17 lalITE PAPER 17.75
8 1/'2 x 11 CANARY PAPER 33.39
8 1/2 X 11 PINK PAPER 111.30
SALES TAX
8 1/2 X 11 CANARY PAPER 77.91
SALES TAX 6.04
AUG. 92 PREH[UN 38.89
INS. PREN. AUG. 92 15.75
000283 FICA/NED
000283 USlT 71.77
FUND 330 TOTAL: 861,23
TOTAL:
CHEKREG2
DATE 07/15/92
DATE
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
07/Z8/92
07/28/92
07/28/92
07/28/92
07/28/92
07/28/92
07/28/92
07/28/92
07/Z8192
VOID
VOID
08:46
CHECK #
11118
11119
11120
11121
11122
11123
11124
11125
11126
11127
11128
11129
11130
11131
11132
11133
000123
000126
000237
000271
000341
000354
000401
000~06
000~09
CITY OF TEHECULA
CHECK REGISTER
NANE
ALIGNNENT CHECKS
ALIGNHENT CHECKS
ALIGMHENT CHECKS
ALIGNNENT CHECKS
ALIGNHENT CHECKS
BURKE WILLIANS & SORENSEN
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
OLIVER BROTHERS
ROBERT BEIN, kN FROST & ASSOC,
WILLDAN ASSOCIATES
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HEALTH DEPT
LEON PERRAULT NATERIALS
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S
VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY
SPOILED CHECKS
SPOILED CHECKS
TOTAL CHECKS
PAGE 1
ANOUNT
6,576.73
1,545.64
266,719.63
2,047.25
2,603.00
5,478.14
1o000.00
290,494.46
2,532.57
578,997.42
REDEHPTiON DATE
CITY OF TEMECULA
CHECKS BY FUND
Fund
001
001
001
001
001
001
110
160
190
190
210
Check Date
7/28/92
7/28/92
7/28/92
7/28/92
7/28/92
7/28/92
7/28/92
7/28/92
7/28/92
7/28/92
7/28/92
Check No.
11123
11127
11128
11129
11130
11131
11125
11123
11124
11127
11126
Vendor Name
Burke Williams & Sorenson
Willdan & Assoc.
Riv. County Health Dept.
Leon Perrault Materials
Riverside County Sheriff
Vallen Safety Supply
Fund 001 TOTAL:
Oliver Bros.
Fund 110 TOTAL:
Burke, Williamson & Sorenson
Fund 160 TOTAL:
California Landscape
Willdan Associates
Fund 190 TOTAL:
RBF and Associates
Fund 210 TOTAL:
Total
Amount
$ 5,425.57
656.00
5,478.14
1,000.00
29,049.46
2.532.57
305,586.74
266.719.63
266,719.63
1.151.16
1.151.16
1,545,64
1.947.00
3.492.64
2.047.25
2,047.25
578.997.42
CHEKREG2
DATE 08/03/92
DATE
07/08/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/16/92
07/20/92
07/28/92
07/~0/92
07/29/9Z
VOID
VOID
VOID
07/30/92
07/30/92
07/16/92
07/30/92
07/30/92
07/30/92
07/30/92
07/30/92
07/30/92
07/30/92
07/30/92
07/30/92
07/30/92
07:51
CHECK #
11069
11134
11135
11136
11138
11139
11207
11251
11252
11253
11254
11255
11256
605289
640297
658670
11257
11258
11259
11260
11261
11262
11263
11264
11265
11266
VEND #
000245
000471
000140
000116
000181
000156
000413
000472
000422
000160
000283
000444
000444
000105
000135
000138
000155
000177
000178
000184
CITY OF TEHECULA
CHECK REGISTER
NANE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PRENIUN)
I60E & CONPANY
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT
AVP VISION PLAN
G.R,E.A,T, TRUST
DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PARADISE CHEVROLET
ACCUCOPY
EHPLOYNENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
ALIONHENT CHECKS
ALIONNENT CHECKS
ALIGNRENT CHECKS
SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPNENT DEPT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT
SOSBEE, LOIS
NETH, NADINE
WIHBERLY, VAL
AE] SECURITY, INC.
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE
CITICORP NORTH ANERICA
DAVLIN
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO.
GTE
PAGE 1
ANOUNT
17,092.38
1,000.00
1,022.25
615.65
800.00
783.00
270.00
51.94
856.29
1,681.68
15,241.14
3,728.35
4,582.37
20.00
22.00
20.00
35.00
490.42
1,427.57
1,712.79
65.63
325.71
16.40
REDEMPTION DATE
CHEKREG2
DATE 08/03/92 07:51
DATE CHECK #
VEND #
CiTY OF TENECULA
CHECK REGISTER
NAME
PAGE 2
AMOUNT
REDEMPTION DATE
07/30/92 11267 000194
07/30/92 11268 000223
07/30/92 11269 0002~6
07/30/92 11270 000266
07/30/92 11271 000275
07/30/92 11272 000285
07/30/92 11273 000322
07/30/92 11274 000325
07/30/92 11275 000326
07/30/92 11276 000542
07/30/92 11277 000356
07/30/92 11278 000370
07/30/92 11279 000381
07/30/92 11280 000389
07/30/92 11281 000449
07/30/92 11282 000450
07/30/92 11283 000451
07/30/92 11284 000452
07/30/92 11285 000453
07/30/92 11286 000454
07/30/92 11287 000455
07/30/92 11288 000456
07/30/92 11289 000457
07/30/92 11290 000458
07/30/92 11291 000459
07/30/92 11292 000460
ICtM RETIREMENT
JOHN NCTIGNE & ASSOCIATES
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT
RIGHT~AY
ROHERO, LUCI
SIR SPEEDY
UNIGLOBE BUTTERFIELD TRAVEL
UNITED k~AY OF THE INLAND
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
~INDSOR PARTNERS ' RANCHO IND.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPPLY SER
BIRDSALL, PATRICIA
TIRITZLLI, STEVE J.
USCM
K.E.C. CDI4PANY
FARRZS, KATHRYNE
KING ONE K-9
RICHARDSON, LAURIE
THE ECONOMICS PRESS, INC.
RANCHO CANYON IND MEDICAL
LONG BEACH HILTON
POULTER, AMBER
~/E CAN DO
CA. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATiON
TUMBLE JUMBLE
SAgREZ, LINDA
11,1/,6.38
3,510.76
12,630.29
57.39
45.25
28.77
1,550.00
91. O0
50.00
29,118,71
250L95
58.73
3,466.70
1,263
5.00
480. O0
416.00
204. O0
31.80
250.00
177.60
201.60
230.40
171.32
936.80
264.00
CHEKREG2
DATE 08103192
DATE
07/30/92
07/30/92
07/30/92
07/30/92
07/30/92
07/30192
07130192
07/30/92
07/30/9Z
07/30/92
07130192
07/30/92
07:51
CHECK #
112f3
11294
112~5
112~
11297
11298
112~
11300
11301
11302
11303
11304
VEND #
000~1
000~2
0004&3
000464
000465
0004,66
000~7
000468
000/.5,9
000470
000481
000484
CITY OF TENECULA
CHECK REGISTER
NAmE
P]NKY'S
THE CLIJ8
POLLARD, DAN
k'RIGHT, EDNA
STRADLEY, KATHY
WHITEHEAD, RHONDA
TENECULA VALLEY TAEIGJONDO
TVHS ACCIDENT VICTIHS FEN.FUND
TVCC FENORIAL SCHOLARSHIP
GOVERNHENT FINANCE OFFICERS
GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONFENTAL
CALIFORNIA ASSOC. FOR LOCAL
TOTAL CHECKS
PAGE 3
AMCXJNT
::~,4.00
280.00
400.00
120.00
168.00
~4.80
364.00
1,200.00
850.00
855.00
135.00
200.00
123,878.66
REDEMPTION DATE
CITY OF TF_~IECULA
CHECKS BY FUND
Fund
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
Ch~ck Date Check No. Vendor Name
7/08/92
7/16/92
7/16.92
7/16/92
7/16/92
W16/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
11069 PERS Health
11134 IGOE and Company
11135 Colonial Life
11136 AVP Vision Plan
11138 G.R.E.A.T. Trust
11139 Denticare
11252 Accucopy
11253 EDP
605289 S~curity Pacific Nat. Bank
640297 EDD
658670 EDD
11263 Davlin
11264 Glennies
11266 GTE
11267 ICMA Retirement
11268 John McTighe
11269 PERS Retirement
11271 Romero, Luci
11272 Sir Speedy
11273 Uniglobal Travel
11274 United Way
11276 Windsor Partners
11277 Riverside County Supply
11278 Birdsall, Patricia
11280 USCM
11281 K.E.C. Company
11285 Economic Press Inc.
11286 Rancho Canyon Medical
11287 Long Beach Hilton
11290 Cal Dept. of Transportation
11300 TVHS Accident Victims
11301 TVCC Memorial Scholarship
11302 Government Finance Officers
11304 Calif. Association for Local
Fund 001 TOTAL:
Amount
9,327.70
1,000.00
666.76
375.42
502.50
467.00
856.29
1011.54
9728.47
2437.82
3,001.42
1,7 12.79
65.63
16.40
7,978.78
3,5 10.76
8,208.17
45.25
28.77
1,550.00
62.76
29,118.71
250.95
58.73
443.42
5.00
31.80
250.00
177.60
171.32
1,200.00
850.00
855.00
200.00
86,166.76
Fund
Check Date Check No. Vendor Name
Amount
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
i90
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
7/08/92 11069 PEPS Health
7/08/92 11135 Colonial Life
7/08/92 11136 AVP Vision Plan
7/08/92 11138 G.R.E.A.T. Trust
7~08~92 11139 Denticare
7/08/92 605298 Security Pacific Nat. Bank
7/08192 640297 E.D.D.
7/08/92 658670 E.D.D.
7/30/92 11261 Central Cities Signs
7/30/92 11267 ICMA Retirement
7/30/92 11269 PERS Retirement
7~30~92 11270 Rightway
7130192 11274 United Way
7/30/92 11275 Unitog
Fund 100 TOTAL:
7/08/92 11069 PERS Health
7/08/92 11135 Colonial Life
7/08/92 11136 AVP Vision Plan
7/08/92 11138 G.R.E.A.T. Trust
7/08/92 1139 ' Denticare
7108192 11253 E.D.D.
7/08/92 605289 Security Pac. Nat Bank
7/08/92 640297 E.D.D.
7/08/92 658670 E.D.D.
7/08/92 11257 Sosbee, Lois
7/08/92 11258 Neth, Nadine
7/08/92 11259 Wimberly, Vaterie
7/08/92 11260 AEI Security
7/08/92 11267 ICMA Retirement
7/08/92 11269 PERS Retirement
7/08/92 11274 United Way
7/08/92 11276 Tirtille, Steve
7/08192 11280 USCM
7/08/92 11282 Farris, Katheryn
W08/92 11283 King One K-9
7/08/92 11284 Richardson, Laurie
7/08/92 11288 Poulter, Amber
7/08/92 11289 We Can Do
3,501.52
29.55
98.44
92.50
100.00
1,918.50
446.14
758.79
490.42
300.16
1,825.17
57.39
8.00
50.00
9,676.58
3,571.86
316.00
112.90
170.00
176.00
670.14
3,149.36
731.74
710.93
20.00
22.00
20.00
35.00
2,068.98
2,121.01
14.00
3,466.70
820.42
480.00
416.00
204.00
201.60
230.40
Fund
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
190
250
250
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
310
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
Check Date
7/08/92
7/08/92
7/08/92
7/08/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/08/92
7/16.92
7/16/92
7/16/92
7/30/92
7/30.92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7/30/92
7130/92
7/30/92
Check
11291
11292
11293
11294
11295
11296
11297
11298
11299
11303
11207
11069
11135
11136
11138
605289
640297
658670
11267
11269
11274
11251
11138
605298
640297
658670
11262
11265
11267
11269
No. Vendor Name
Tumble Jungle
Sawre, z, Linda
Pinky's
The Club
Pollard, Dan
Wright, Edna
Standley, Kathy
Whitehead, Rhonda
Temecula Valley TKD
Fund 190 TOTAL:
Geotechnical & Env.
State of California
Fund 250 Total:
PEaS Health
Colonial Life
AVP Vision Plan
G.R.E.A.T. Trust
, Security Pacific Nat. Bank
E.D.D.
E.D.D.
ICMA Retirement
PERS Retirement
United Way
Fund 300 TOTAL:
Paradise Che.
Fund 300 TOTAL:
G.R.E.A.T. Trust
Security Pacific Nat. Bank
E.D.D.
E.D.D.
Citi Corp.
Golden State Trading
ICMA Retirement
PERS Retirement
Fund 320TOTAL:
Amount
936.80
264.00
364.00
280.00
400.00
120.00
168.00
444.80
364.00
23,070.64
135.00
270.00
405.0O
155.11
9.94
3.94
5.00
87.24
22.89
21.87
44.75
92.71
1.24
51.94
51.94
10.00
245.64
59.65
59.65
1,427.57
325.71
434.73
184,14
2,747.09
Fund
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
Check Date
7/08/92
7/08/92
7/08/92
7/08/92
7/08/92
7/08/92
7/08/92
7/08/92
7/08/92
Check No.
11069
11136
11138
11139
605289
640297
658670
11267
11274
Vendor Name
PERS Health
AVP Vision Plan
G.R.E.A.T. Trust
Denticar~
Security Pacific Nat. Bank
E.D.D.
E.D.D.
ICMA Retirement
United Way
Fund 330 TOTAL:
Amount
536.19
24.95
20.00
40.00
111.93
30.11
29.71
318.98
5.O0
1,315.96
TOTAL:
$123.878.66
D~TE ~M~CK ~
08/!I192 11200
08/11/92 11202
0B/!1!~2 11203
~/11/~ 11204
VEnD $
OOO12j
000271
000406
CiT':' E: TEKEC[LA
PA~E i
NA~E
BURKE WILLlAMB & BOREKSEN
ESBIL CORPORATION
llr765.2B
6.63t77
RA~TEK
ROBERT DEIN, WR FROST ~ ASSOC.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS
TRA~-P;CFIC
TOTAL CHECKS
-1'~gBt22---
Bl,lO0.O0
~62,001.12
1,064,875J~
CITY OF TEMECULA
CHECKS BY FUND
Fund
001
001
001
001
001
001
Check Date Check No. Vendor Name
8/11/92
8/11/92
8/11/92
8/11/92
8/11/92
8111/92
11199 Burk~ Williams & Sorenson
11200 Esqil Corporation
11201 Ramtek
11202 RBF
11203 Riverside County Sheriff
11204 Trans-Paci~c
Fund 001 TOTAL:
Amount
$ 11,765.28
6,639.77
1,989.22
81,100.00
962,001.12
1.380.00
1,064,875.39
CHEICREG2
DATE 08/03/92 09:39
DATE CHECK #
VEND #
VOID 11305
VOiD 11306
VO]D 11307
VO]D 11308
VOID 11309
VOID 11310
08/11/92 11311 000127
08/11/92 11312 000161
08/11/92 11313 000202
08/11/~2 11316 000217
08/11/~2 11315 000230
08/11/~2 11316 000231
08111192 11317 000257
08/11/92 11318 000269
08/11/92 11319 000276
08/11/92 11320 000356
08/11/92 11321 00038~.
08/11/92 11322 0004,34
08/11/92 11323 000~73
08/11/92 11326 000682
08/11/92 11325 0004,83
CITY OF TEMECULA
CHECK REGISTER
NAME
AL[GMNENT
ALIGNMENT
ALIGNMENT
ALIGNMENT
ALIGNMENT
ALIGNMENT
CALIFGNN]AN
EDEN SYSTEMS, INC.
J,F, DAV]DSGN
MARGAR]TA OFF]C]ALS ASSOC.
MUNZ FINANCIAL SERVICES, ]NC.
NBS/LOMRY
RANTEK
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
PURKZSS, ROSE
RZVERSIDE COUNTY HEALTH DEPT
LAW/CRANDALL,
SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS
CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMENT
LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES
INLAND ASPHALT & COAT[NGS
TOTAL CHECKS
PAGE 1
AMOUNT
1,727.26
18,694.70
10,000.00
1,232.00
1,750.00
36,169.20
11,804.59
1,683.82
1,625.73
5,982.99
1,063.63
17,3~2.36
1,650.00
7,160.00
189,611.12
REDEMPT[GN DATE
FUND
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
110
110
110
160
190
190
190
190
190
190
210
210
210
250
250
320
CHECK DATE
08/11/92
08/11/92
08/11/92
08/11/92
08/11/92
08/11/92
08/11/92
08/11/92
08/11/92
08111192
08/11/92
08/11/92
08/11/92
08/11/92
08/11/92
08/11/92
08/11/92
08/11/92
08/11/92
08/11/92
08/11/92
08/11/92
08111192
CHECK NO.
11311
11312
11313
11317
11318
11320
11322
11316
11324
11324
11323
11311
11311
11314
11315
11315
11319
11316
11321
11325
11324
11311
CITY OF TEMECULA
CHECKS BY FUND
VENDOR NAME
CALIFORNIAN
EDEN SYSTEMS, INC.
J.F. DAVIDSON
RAMTEK
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HEALTH D
SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS
NBS/LOHRY
LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES
LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES
CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMENT
CALIFORNIAN
CALIFORNIAN
NARGARITA OFFICIALS ASSOC
MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES,
NUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES,
PURKISS, ROSE
NBS/LOgRY
LAW/CRANDALL, INC.
INLAND ASPHALT & COATINGS
LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES
LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES
CALIFORNIAN
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
19143901/19171001 APRIL
ACCOUNTING SOFTW./TRAVEL
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
STREET NAINT.
FOLDERS,LTR ETC
ANIRAL CONTROL JUNE 92
PRO SERV. 06/16-06/30/92
FUND 001 TOTAL:
8~5.12
18,494.70
10,000.00
11,804.59
202.04
5,982.99
17,342.36
64,671.80
CONST. MANAG. Z-15
PRO. PH 91-03
PRO. I~ 91-03
FUND 110 TOTAL:
29,7?9.20
1,400.00
3,044.00
:r~,17~.20
MEMBERSHIP DUES FOR 7/92-
FUND 160 TOTAL:
1,450.00
1,450.00
EXCEEDED QUOTED AMOLINT 8~
196977011/06/16/92
UMPIRE FEES/ASSOC. FEES
PHASE 6 INSTALLATION/TRAI
CREDIT/REFUND PROJECT
REPROOUCTION NARCH, APR &
FUND 190 TOTAL:
19.86-
853.98
1,232.00
1,250.00
500.00
1,625.73
5,~41.85
PROF. $ERV. I~d'92'01
PRO. JUNE 92
PROJECT NO. P~92-01
FUND 210 TOTAL:
6,/~0.00
1,0~3.63
7~,1~.86
79,628.49
312 OTHER LITIGATION GTE
CR. EXCEEDED QUOTED PRICE
FUND 250 TOTAL:
3,395.00
679.00'
2,716.00
52 WEEK SUBSCRIPTION
FUND 320 TOTAL:
48.00
48.00
330
330
CHECK DATE
08/11/92
08/11/92
CHECK NO.
11318
11318
CITY OF TENECULA
CHECKS BY FUND
VENDOR NANE
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
DESCRIPTION
8 1/2 X 11 ~HITE PAPER
SALES TAX
FUND 330 TOTAL:
TOTAL:
AHOUNT
1,375.20
106.58
1,~81.78
ITEM
NO.
4
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PREPABle, r} BY:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official
August 11, 1992
Public Nuisance Abatement - 28613 Pujol Street
Lou I-Iaehnlen - Code Enforcement Officer
RECO~ATION:
It is recommended that the City Council:
Approve the issuance of a purchase order in the amount of $17,725 to Hunt
Wrecking for the removal of all vehicles and scrap metals.
Approve the issuance of a purchase order in the amount of $14,845 to
Environmental Recovery Services for the bnT~rdous material removal.
3. Appropriate $32,570 for Other Outside Services from Unmservod Fund Balance.
BACKGROUND:
Ordinance No. 90-24 Abatement of Public Nuisance was adopted by the City Council December
4, 1990. This ordinance allows the City to provide a just, equitable and practical method
whereby lands or buildings which are dilapidated, unsafe, dangerous, unsanitary, cluttered with
weeds, debris, abandoned vehicles, or are a menace or hazard to life, health or general welfare
of the City of Temecula, may be required to be repaired, renovated, vacated, demolished or
cleaned up by removal of offensive conditions.
Agenda Report
August 11, 1992
Page 2
DISCUSSION:
On approximately September 5, 1991, code enforcement received a complaint regarding an
alleged public nuisance located at 28613 Pujol Street. After inspection of the premises revealed
the existence of the alleged condition, abatement proceedings were initiated in accordance with
the pwvisions of Ordinance 90-24. Several attempts were made to notify the owner of the
nuisance conditions beth in person and in writing. Notices were subsequen~y sent to the known
toniling address by beth first chss and certified mail. No response fwm the owner was
received.
In an effort to determine the extent of the nuisance condition, an inspection warrant was applied
for and granted by the local district court judge. An inspection was then performed revealing,
for example, the storage of over sixty (60) vehicles in various conditions, storage of scrap metal,
tires and lumber, and what appears to be materials needing evaluation by hazardous materials
experts. As a result of this inspection, staff proceeded to post the property as a public nuisance,
requesting that the nuisance be abated in a timely fashion. Once again, no response was
received fwm the property owner to either the posting of the property or the mailed notices.
Upon expiration of the requested abatement period, a hearing was held before an independent
hearing officer for the purpose of having the property's designation as a public nuisance upheld
and the City given the authority to cause the abatement of the nuisance condition to be done.
The hearing also gave the property owner the ability to give testimony as to why the property
should not be designated a public nuisance and the nuisance abated by the City. Again no
response was received from the property owner to either mailed or posted hearing notices. The
nuisance designation was upheld and abatement was ordered. Staff has since obtained an
abatement warrant and completed the bidding process for the abatement of the nuisance
conditions.
Bid proposals were received from a total of five (5) firms for the abatement work. Two (2)
proposals were accepted for the vehicle, scrap and debris cleanup and three (3) proposals were
accepted for the hazardous material removal. Hunt Wrecking was the low bidder for the
vehicle, scrap and debris cleanup with a bid of $17,725. Environmental Recovery Services was
the low bidder for the hazardous material removal with a bid of $14,845.
VEHICLE, SCRAP AND DR~RIS DISPOSAL
Hunt Wrecking
24720 Hwy 74
Perris, CA 92570
$17,725
The J.V. Company
207 E. Arrow Hwy
San Dimas, CA 91733
$25,550
v:qmmlmk.m9%mammli i .Isl~i
Agenda Report
August 11, 1992
Page 3
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DISPOSAL
Consolidated Waste Industries, Inc.
10680 Silicon Avenue
Montchir, CA 91763-4621
$24,615.50
Disposal Control Service, Inc.
1369 W. 9th Street
Upland, CA 91786
$18,422.02
Environmental Recovery Services
6407 Alondra Blvd.
Paramount, CA 90723
$14,845.00
FISCAL IMPACT:
It is necessary to appropriate $32,570 for Other Outside Services from Unreserved Fund Balance
for these services. Following completion of the abatement process, a public hearing will be held
before the Council to consider whether the $32,570 plus related City administrative costs will
be recorded as a special assessment against the property.
ITEM NO.
5
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBYECT:
APPROVAL:
CITY ATrORNEY ,
CITY OF TliMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official,/(~
August 11, 1992
Continuation of Consideration of a Resolution Establishing Building
Valuation and Miscellaneous Fee Schedules
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council continue consideration of this item off calendar to allow
adequate time for a resolution to be achieved.
DISCUSSION:
The Chid Building Official has been meeting with representatives of the development
community in an effort to resolve concerns voiced during the hne 9, 1992 meeting regarding
the proposed valuation and miscellaneous fee schedules. Additional time is needed for further
committee research and discussion.
ITEM
NO.
6
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROV~
C1TY ATTORNEY ,
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Planning Department
August 11, 1992
Tentative Tract Map No. 23209 - Amendment to Condition No. 33
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends that the City Council:
Approve the amendment to Condition No. 33
BACKGROUND
On June 9, 1992, the City Council airproved Tentative Tract Map No. 23209. At that meeting,
there was discussion relative to impacts associated with access to the Tract along Butterfield
Stage Road and Nicolas Road. The City Attorney suggested added the following condition of
approval:
"Prior to recordation of the final map, an Assessment District or other public financing
mechanism, shall be established to address access to the Tract along Butterfield Stage
Road and Nicolas Road. The subdivider shall participate in and pay its fair share of any
such Assessment District or other public financing mechanism."
Subsequent to the City Council meeting, the applicants representative spoke with the City
Attorney and suggested a clarification to the condition as follows:
"Prior to recordation of the final map, an Assessment District or other public financing
mechanism shall be established to address additional access to the area from Butterfield
Stage Road and Nicolas Road. The subdivider shall participate in and pay its fair share
of any such Assessment District or other public financing mechanism formed to provide
the improvements." (Amendment requested by applicants representative).
Both the City Engineer and the City Attorney have reviewed this change to the condition and
fred it acceptable.
FISCAL IMPACT
None
SWrAFFRFr~IO~"OA.CC vl~ I
ITEM NO.
7
APPROVALERf~
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Department of Public Works
August I 1, 1992
Award of Professional Engineering Services Contract for an Interchange
Study on I-15
PREPARED BY: Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
The joint Temecula/Murrieta Transportation Committee recommends that the City Council
award a contract for Professional Engineering Services to NBS/Lowry of San Diego for an
amount not to exceed $15,000 to conduct an Interchange Study on I-15 north of Winchester
Road and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
BACKGROUND:
At the last joint City Council meeting between the Cities of Temecula and Murrieta, the
Councils directed the Public Works Directors to solicit the services of a qualified consultant
to conduct a feasibility study of potential interchanges on I-15 north of Winchester Road and
recommend a location both communities could support. The study was not to exceed
$15,000 and would be completed in 25 working days. In addition, the study would
incorporate a work plan that would describe the steps necessary for a new connection report
to receive approval from Caltrans and the Federal Highway Administration.
Request for Proposals were sent to ten engineering firms, a pre-proposal conference was held,
and five proposals to complete the study were submitted. The proposals were reviewed and
the firms of NBS/Lowry and Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates were selected to give
a presentation before a subcommittee of the Temecula/Murrieta Transportation Committee.
Based on the qualifications of the project team, experience with projects of similar nature, the
proposed work plan, and the oral presentation, NBS/Lowry was recommended by the
subcommittee to the full joint transportation committee. Subsequently, the entire Committee
endorsed the selection and is recommending to their respective Councils that a Professional
Engineering Services Contract be awarded to NBS/Lowry.
-1- pwO2\agdrpt~92\0811\l-15stdy.awd 0730a
The work proposed by NBS/Lowry includes the following:
Review available data to gain insight into needs, opportunities and constraints, and to
identify additional information which must be secured to move forward in subsequent
stages of project conceptualization and development.
Review existing data to identify needs for a new arterial interchange and
tentatively identify possible interim and long-term complementary or alternative
improvements to the traffic circulation system and its operation.
Review existing land use and committed land use as it impacts opportunities for
a new interchange.
C. Review existing and committed circulation system.
D. Review potential infrastructure/utility constraints.
E. Review tentative environmental constraints.
Review known public attitudes and interests in the area which could impact
feasibility of a new interchange proposal.
II.
Advise Caltrans/FHWA and RCTC of initial study goals and secure informal input useful
to initial study considerations.
III.
Develop conceptual geometric solutions (2) to provide a new interchange, with City
Staff oversight.
IV.
Identify potential funding sources which might conceivably be applicable to a new
interchange, ranging from local to state/federal sources, depending on the nature of
interchange improvements and their benefits.
Identify recommended project development work plan steps to pursue further phases
of project development for this new interchange and complementary or alternative
improvements.
VI.
Make presentations of Initial Study Report to the ad-hoc joint committee of Temecula
and Murrieta City representatives. Make other presentations to City Councils (2) as
may be desired.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The contract is a three-party agreement between Temecula, Murrieta, and NBS/Lowry. Each
City will be responsible for 50% ($7,500) of the contract cost. Funds are available in the
Public Works Consulting Account No. 100-164-999-5248.
-2- pw02\agdrpt%92~0811 ~1-15stdy.awd 0730a
AGREEMENT
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of ,
19 , between the Cities of Temecula and Murrieta, each a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "City" and NBS/Lowry, a California Corporation, hereinafter referred
to as "Consultant".
The parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
ADMINISTRATION. The City of Temecula is designated as the City administrative
agent to receive and distribute all correspondence and information and to process
billing and payment as described below. The City of Murrieta will receive true
copies of all reports, files, and drawings as well as invoices and proof of payment.
SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in
Exhibit "A".
PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best
of his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described herein.
PAYMENT. The City of Temecula agrees to pay Consultant monthly, based upon
the Lump Sum amount of $15,000.00 for the total term of the Agreement unless
additional payment is approved by the City Council; orovided that the City Manager
may approve additional payments not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the
Agreement, but in no event more than ~ 10,000.00.
Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed to the City
of Temecula. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each
month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made by the
City of Temecula to Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice.
The City of Murrieta agrees to pay 50% of the cost of this contract and to pay
~7,500 to the City 'of Temecula upon execution of this contract. Additional
amounts, if approved by the City of Murrieta's City Manager, will be subsequently
remitted to the City of Temecula as required.
SUSPENSION, TERMINATION OR ABANDONMENT OF AGREEMENT. The City
may, at any time, suspend, terminate or abandon this Agreement, or any portion
hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice.
Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under
this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. Within thirty-five (35) days
after receiving an invoice from the Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for
work done through the date that work is to be ceased pursuant to this section.
If the City suspends, terminates or abandons a portion of this Agreement such
suspension, termination or abandonment shall not make void or invalidate the
remainder of this Agreement.
21forms/ARG-04 Rev 1/22/92 -1- pwO1\i-15date\stud¥.agt 0730a
BREACH OF CONTRACT. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under
the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue
compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Default
shall include not performing the tasks described herein to the reasonable
satisfaction of the City Manager of the City. Failure by the Consultant to make
progress in the performance of work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes
beyond his control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, shall not be
considered a default.
If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant defaults in the
performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the
Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have ten (10)
days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering
a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default
within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other
provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and
without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity
or under this Agreement.
TERM. This Agreement shall commence on ,1992, and
shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but
in no event later than September 30, 1992.
Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between
the City and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall
be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final.
Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired
judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration
hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section
1280, et sea. City and Consultant shall share the cost of the arbitration equally.
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the event
of termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, all original
documents, designs, drawings and notes prepared in the course of providing the
services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property
of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without
the permission of the Consultant.
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The Consultant is and shall at all times remain as
to the City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor any of its officers,
employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of the Consultant or any
of the Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as herein set forth. The
Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its
officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of
the City.
No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall
not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing
2/forms/ARC-04 Rev 1/22/92 -2- pw01\i-15date~study.agt 0730a
10.
11.
12.
13.
services hereunder 'for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or
indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing
services hereunder.
LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and
Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or
in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The
Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations.
The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity
occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section.
NOTICE. Whenever it shall be necessary for either party to serve notice on the
other respecting this Agreement, such notice shall be served by certified mail,
postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the City Manager of the
City of Temecula, located at 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California
92590, and the Consultant at 40925 County Center Drive, Suite 120, Temecula,
CA 92591 unless and until different addresses may be furnished in writing by either
party to the other. Notice shall be deemed to have been served seventy-two (72)
hours after the same has been deposited in the United States Postal Services. This
shall be valid and sufficient service of notice for all purposes.
ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement,
nor any pare thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without the prior written
consent of the City.
Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be the
value to the City of the services rendered.
LIABILITY INSURANCE. The Consultant shall maintain insurance acceptable to the
City in full force an effect throughout the term of this contract, against claims for
injuries to persons or damages to properly which may arise from or in connection
with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, his agents,
representatives, employees or subcontractors. Insurance is to be placed with
insurer with a Bests' rating of no less than A:VII. The costs of such insurance shall
be included in the Contractor's bid. The Consultant shall provide the following
scope and limits of insurance:
A. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
Insurance Services Office Form No. GL-0002 (Ed. 1/73) covering
Comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office Form No.
GL-0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability; or
Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
("occurrence" Form No. CG-0001).
Insurance Services Office Form No. CA-0001 (Ed. 1/78) covering
Automobile Liability, code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA-0025.
Workers' Compensation insurance as required by Labor Code of the
State of California and Employers' Liability insurance.
21forrns/ARG-04 Rev 1122/92 -3- pw01\i-15date\study.agt 0730a
4. Errors ana Omissions insurance.
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits of insurance no
less than:
General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for
bodily injury and property damage.
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for
bodily injury and property damage.
Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability: Workers'
Compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of California
and Employers' Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident.
4. Errors and Omissions Insurance: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductible in excess of $1,000
must be declared to and approved by the City·
Other Insurance Provisions. Insurance policies required by this contract shall
contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be
endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided,
canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after
thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City via United States First
Class Mail.
General Liability and Automobile Liability coveraees. The Cities of
Temecula and Murrieta, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers
are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of
activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and
completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or
used by the Consultant, or automobiles owned, lease, hired or borrowed
by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on
the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers.
With regard t'o claims arising from the Consultant's performance of the
work described in this contract, the Consultant's insurance coverage
shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance
maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers
shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, the Consultant's
insurance.
Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shall
not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers officials, employees
or volunteers.
2/forms/ARC-04 Rev 1/22/92 -4- pw01 \i-15date\study.agt 0730a
The Con~ultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to
the limits of the insurer's liability.
Workers' Compensation and EmplOyerS' Liability Coverace. The insurer
shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work
performed by the Consultant for the City.
de
Verification of Coverac~e. Contractor shall furnish the City with
certificates of insurance effecting coverage required by this clause. The
certificates for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person
authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The
certificates are to be on forms provided by the City and are to be
received and approved by the City before work commences. The City
reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required
insurance policies, at any time.
Consultant shall include all subconsultants as insureds under its policies
or shall furnish separate certificates for each subcontractor. All
coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements
stated herein.
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and
approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall
reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as
respects the City, its officers, officials and employees; or the Consultant
shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related
investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
14.
LICENSES. The Consultant and subconsultant shall obtain all necessary licenses,
including but not limited to City Business License.
15.
INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless the
City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all
claims, demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the
City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be
imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising
out of Consultant's negligent performance under the terms of this Agreement,
excepting only liability a~ising out of the sole negligence of the City.
16.
ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached
her.to or referred to her.in integrate all terms and conditions mentioned her.in or
incidental her.to supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the
subject matter hereof.
In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this
Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement
shall prevail.
2/forms/ARC-04 Rev 1/22/92
-5- pwO1\i-15date\study.agt 0730a
EFFECTIVE DATE AND EXECUTION: This Agreement shall be effective from and
after the date it is signed by the representatives of the City. This Agreement may be
executed in counterparts.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
CONSULTANT
By
G. Brent Muchow, Vice President
CITY OF TEMECULA
CITY OF MURRIETA
By
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
By
Jerry Allen, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By
Scott F. Field, Temecula City Attorney
By
Neal Singer, Murrieta City Attorney
ATTEST: ATTEST:
By
June S. Greek, Temecula City Clerk
By
Kay Vinson, Murrieta City Clerk
21forms/ARG-04 Rev 1/22192 -6- pw01\i-15date\study.agt 0730a
EXHIBIT "A"
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
ScOpe of Services
I. Review available data to gain insight into needs, opportunities and constraints, and
to identify additional information which must be secured to move forward in
subsequent stages of project conceptualization and development.
A. Review existing data to identify needs for a new arterial interchange and
tentatively identify possible interim and long-term complementary or
alternative improvements to the traffic circulation system and its operation.
B. Review existing land use and committed land use as it impacts opportunities
for a new interchange.
C. Review existing and committed circulation system.
D. Review potential infrastructure/utility constraints.
E. Review tentative environmental constraints.
F. Review known public attitudes and interests in the area which could impact
feasibility of a new interchange proposal.
II. Advise Caltrans/FHWA and RCTC of initial study goals and secure informal input
useful to initial study considerations.
III. Develop conceptual geometric solutions (2) to provide a new interchange with City
Staff oversight.
IV. Identify potential funding sources which might conceivably be applicable to a new
interchange, ranging from local to state/federal sources, depending on the nature
of interchange improvements and their benefits.
V. Identify recommended project development work plan steps to pursue further
phases of project deveropment for this new interchange and complementary or
alternative improvements.
VI. Make presentations of the initial Study Report to the Joint Temecula/Murrieta
Transportation Committee. Make other presentations to both City Councils as may
be desired.
2/forms/ARG-04 Rev 1/22/92 EXHIBIT "A" pw01\i-15date\study.agt 0730a
Soecific Deliverables
> Letter-form Status Report with 11 "xl 7" drawings.
Schematic 24"x36" drawings of two selected conceptual alternatives with pro and
con list.
· Refined Project Development Work Plan included in the above report.
Deliver all final materials to Temecula for final distribution
Additional ConsultinQ Services Not Included in this Contract
The Cities of Temecula and Murrieta recognize that the work effort required to achieve the
goal of a new freeway connection may take a long-term sustained program of combined
strategy, planning, engineering and advocacy. It is also recognized that such an effort would
likely result in a series of modifications to the plan, strategy and other factors in order to
satisfy the Cities' transportation and circulation needs, as well as conform to the various
County, State and Federal requirements that will be demanded by those agencies. That
planning and engineering effort is illustrated in part by the refined work plan which will be
delivered as a part of this contract, but full implementation of that work plan is not included
at this time.
The Cities, therefore, may at their option request NBS/Lowry at any time to submit a proposal
to serve as a program management consultant to help direct and maintain the effort to
improve traffic circulation in the vicinities of North Temecula and South Murrieta.
The Director of Public Works for each City are hereby authorized to receive such a proposal
from NBS/Lowry and to present it to their respective City Councils for further consideration
with recommendation for appropriate action at such time as they desire.
Schedule
Work Day Plan
1
2
3-5
3-10
8-14
15
16-24
20-24
25
Notice to Proceed
Meet with City Staffs
Meet with Caltrans
Analyze Data
Develop Preliminary Geometrics
Meet with City Staffs and deliver letter-form Status Report
Refine selected alternative
Refine Project Development Work Plan
Meet with Ad Hoc Coordinating Committee
2/formslARG-O4 Rev 1 ~22~92
EXHIBIT "A"
pw01%i-15date\study.agt 0730a
ITEM NO.
8
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
/}"~.~ Department of Public Works
August 11, 1992
Renewal of Annual Street Maintenance Contract FY92-93
PREPARED BY: Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council extend the Street Maintenance Contract as amended with Ramtek
Contractors, Inc. of Temecula for a period of one year (June 30, 1993) and authorize the
Mayor to execute the Contract.
BACKGROUND:
At the regular City Council meeting of September 24, 1991, the Street Maintenance Contract
for FY91-92 was awarded to the lowest responsible bidder, Ramtek Contractors, Inc. of
Temecula. Ramtek has performed satisfactory work during the past year and has responded
efficiently in all emergency situations. During FY91-92, Ramtek provided maintenance
services to the City for a total cost of $409,047.61. The total cost of service was allocated
as follows:
$148,020.18
For pavement repairs, including street and trench failures,
overlays, berm repair and potholes.
194,796.75
For channel and catch basin cleaning.
66,230.68
For concrete repairs (curb, gutters, and sidewalks), shoulder
grading and storm cleanup.
The original Contract contains provisions that allows the Contract to be extended on a yearly
basis by mutual agreement of both parties for up to five years by the prevailing construction
cost index. Additionally, since the original Contract was executed, the City has hired a
Maintenance Superintendent and a two-man Maintenance Crew, and now has the ability to
-1- pwOl\agdrpt\92\081 l\strnaint.con 0730
do some of the work specified in the original Contract in-house along with managing some
contracts that could be more cost-effective when performed by a specialized contractor (tree
trimming, striping, etc.).
Representatives of the Public works Department have met with representatives of Ramtek and
have mutually agreed that all of the unit prices that have been effective for FY91-92 will
remain in effect for FY92-93 with no increases. However, the Contractor is requesting that
all items that are not specified by unit prices and are therefore performed on a time and
materials basis be increased by the 1991 prevailing construction price index of 4.3%. This
increase would typically apply to emergency services such as street clearing during the rainy
season. The increase is reasonable and is in accordance with the original Contract·
The Contract has also been amended by making provisions for the Contractor to schedule all
trench repair and patch work within thirty (30) days of receipt of the Work Order from the
City. This eliminates the necessity of the City having to provide scheduling for the Contractor
and allows the Contractor to deploy his forces in a more cost-effective manner. The
Contractor has also agreed to provide space within the Contractor's yard on a no fee basis
for the Public Works Crews storage bins, barricades, and all related equipment used in daily
and off-hour job assignments. With the construction of the Senior Center, the existing Public
Works Yard will be forced to move to a new site. This Contract Amendment will provide
space until a permanent location can be found.
The Public Works Department is satisfied with the work performance of Ramtek Contractors,
Inc. and recommends the City Council extend the Street Maintenance Contractor for one year
subject to the following amendments.
The following items listed under Scope of Work in the original Contract will no longer
be required of Ramtek:
E. Minor tree trimming for traffic safety
F. Replacement of traffic signs
G. Painting traffic stripes
H. Painting traffic legends
M. Guardrail repair
2. All unit prices as bid in the original Contract will remain the same.
All labor and material costs associated with tasks not governed by unit prices shall be
increased by the prevailing construction price index of 4.3%.
At any time during the term of the Contract herein, the City Engineer may provide the
Contractor with a list of utility trench repair and street patch work to be done.
Contractor shall have the right to accumulate said lists until the Contractor has a
sufficient amount of work to warrant sending out a crew; however, in no event shall
any work be held for more than thirty (30) calendar days.
Said Contractor shall provide for the City's Public Works Crews access to, and space
at, the Contractor's yard located at 28781 Front street, Temecula, on a no fee basis
for FY92-93 for Public Works Crews storage bins, barricades and all related equipment
used in daily and off-hour job assignments·
-2- p wO 1 ~agdrpt~92~0811 ~stmaint.con 0730
FISCAL IMPACT:
The approved budget for FY92-93 has allocated $470,631 under Account Number
100-164-999-5402 (Routine Street Maintenance), and $250,000 under Account Number
100-164-999-5401 (Drainage Facilities Maintenance).
-3- pwO 1 \agdrpt\92\0811 \stmaint.con 0730
ITEM NO. 9
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
/1'~Department of Public Works
August 11, 1992
Award of contract for the construction of street improvements on Sixth
Street between Front Street and Mercedes (PW 92-02)
PREPARED BY: ck
RECOMMEND/~I'ION:'
That the City Council:
Hodson, Senior Public Works Inspector
Approve award of contract for construction of street and sidewalk improvements on Sixth
Street (Project No. PW 92-02) to Ramtek Contractors Inc. for $41,326.30, and authorize the
Mayor to execute said contract.
Transfer $45,458.93 from the Development Impact Fund to the Capital Projects Fund and
appropriate $45,458.93 (bid amount plus 10% to allow for possible change orders) to Capital
Projects Account No. 021-165-623-5804.
BACKGROUND:
On May 26, 1992 the City Council authorized the Public Works Department to advertise a
notice inviting bids for construction of street and sidewalk improvements on Sixth Street
between Front Street and Mercedes.
Five bidders responded with Ramtek Construction Inc. being the low bidder at $41,326.31
with a 30 day contract.
FISCAL IMPACT:
It is necessary to transfer $45,458.93 from the Development Impact Fund to the Capital
Projects Fund and appropriate said amount to Capital Projects Account No.
021-165-623-5804.
ATTACHMENT
1. Bid Results Spreadsheet
pwO5\agdrpt\92\081 l~pw92-O2.awd 0720
ITEM NO. 10
APPROVAL
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City Council/City Manager
/~Department of Public Works
DATE:
August 11, 1992
SUBJECT:
Award of professional services contract to Leighton and Associates for
Geotechnical Services on Sixth Street Project (PW 92-02)
PR=PARED B~~Jack
RECOMMENDATION:
Hodson, Senior Public Works Inspector
That the City Council:
Award a professional services contract in the amount of $3,038.00 to Leighton and
Associates for Geotechnical Services on the Sixth Street project (Project No. PW92-02) and
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said contract.
Transfer $3038.00 from the Development Impact Fund and appropriate $3,038.00 to the
Capital Projects Account No. 021-165-623-5804.
BACKGROUND:
In January 1992 the Department of Public Works solicited qualifications from interested
engineering firms and formed a qualified short list for providing geotechnical services to the
City on Capital Improvement Projects. Subsequent to bidding PW92-02, Sixth Street,
Leighton and Associates was requested to provide a scope of work for the Sixth Street
Project. A contract with a defined scope of work and a hourly budget not to exceed
$3,038.00 has been negotiated.
FISCAL IMPACT:
It is necessary to transfer $3038.00 from the Development Impact Fund and appropriate
$3,038.00 to the Capital Projects Account No. 021-165-623-5804.
ATTACHMENT:
Agreement for Professional Services
pw05\agdrpt\92\0811\pw92-02.geo 0721
AGREEMENT
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 28th day of July, 1992, between
the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and Leighton
and Associates, a California Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant".
The parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in
Exhibit "A".
PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best
of his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described herein.
PAYMENT. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the hourly rates set
forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, based upon actual time spent on the above
tasks. This amount will not exceed $3,038.00 for the total term of the Agreement
unless additional payment is approved by the City Council; orovided that the City
Manager may approve additional payments not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the
Agreement, but in no event more than $10,000.00.
Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices
shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of
receipt of each invoice·
SUSPENSION. TERMINATION OR ABANDONMENT OF AGREEMENT. The City
may, at any time, suspend, terminate or abandon this Agreement, or any portion
hereof, by serving upon the Consultam at least ten (10) days prior written notice·
Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultam shall immediately cease all work under
this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. Within thirty-five (35) days
after receiving an invoice from the Consultant, the City shall pay Consultam for
work done through the date that work is to be ceased pursuant to this section.
If the City suspends, terminates or abandons a portion of this Agreement such
suspension, termination or abandonment shall not make void or invalidate the
remainder of this Agreement.
BREACH OF CONTRACT. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under
the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue
compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Default
shall include not performing the tasks described herein to the reasonable
satisfaction of the City Manager of the City. Failure by the Consultant to make
progress in the performance of work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes
beyond his control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultam, shall not be
considered a default·
2/formslARG-04 Rev 1122/92 -1 - pwO2~w92-O2~geosoile.egt 071692
If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant defaults in the
performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the
Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have ten (10)
days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering
a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default
within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other
provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and
without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity
or under this Agreement.
TERM. This Agreement shall commence on July 28, 1992, and shall remain and
continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later
than July 28, 1993.
Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between
the City and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall
be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final.
Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired
judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration
hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section
1280, et seo. City and Consultant shall share the cost of the arbitration equally.
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the event
of termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, all original
documents, designs, drawings and notes prepared in the course of providing the
services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property
of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without
the permission of the Consultant.
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The Consultant is and shall at all times remain as
to the City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor any of its officers,
employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of the Consultant or any
of the Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as herein set forth. The
Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its
officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of
the City.
No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall
not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing
services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or
indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing
services hereunder.
LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and
Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or
in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The
Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations.
21formslARG-O4Rev1122192 -2- pwO2%pw92-O2\geosoils.agt 071692
10.
11.
12.
The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity
occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section.
NOTICE. Whenever it shall be necessary for either party to serve notice on the
other respecting this Agreement, such notice shall be served by certified mail,
postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the City Manager of the
City of Temecula, located at 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula , California
92590, and the Consultant at 40935 County Center Drive, Temecula unless and
until different addresses may be furnished in writing by either party to the other.
Notice shall be deemed to have been served seventy-two (72) hours after the same
has been deposited in the United States Postal Services. This shall be valid and
sufficient service of notice for all purposes·
ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement,
nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without the prior written
consent of the City.
Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be the
value to the City of the services rendered.
LIABILITY INSURANCE. The Consultant shall maintain insurance acceptable to the
City in full force an effect throughout the term of this contract, against claims for
injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection
with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, his agents,
representatives, employees or subcontractors. Insurance is to be placed with
insurer with a Bests' rating of no less than A:VII. The costs of such insurance shall
be included in the Contractor's bid. The Consultant shall provide the following
scope and limits of insurance:
A. Minimum ScoPe of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
Insurance Services Office form no. GL-0002 (Ed. 1/73) covering
Comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form
number GL-0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability;
or Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
("occurrence" form CG-0001 ).
2e
Insurance Services Office form no. CA-0001 (Ed. 1/78) covering
Automobile Liability, code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA-0025.
Workers' Compensation insurance as required by Labor Code of the
State of California an Employers' Liability insurance.
4. Errors and Omissions insurance.
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits of insurance no
less than:
General Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for
bodily injury and property damage.
2/forms/ARG-O4Rev1122/92 -3- pwO2%pw92-O2%geosoile.egt 071692
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for
bodily injury and property damage.
m
Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers'
compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of California
and Employers Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident.
4. Errors and Omissions Insurance. $1,000,000 per occurrence.
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductible in excess of $1,000
must be declared to and approved by the City.
Other Insurance Provisions. Insurance policies required by this contract shall
contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be
endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided,
canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after
thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the City via United States First
Class Mail.
be
General Liability and Automobile Liability coverages. The City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as
insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on
behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the
Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant, or
automobiles owned, lease, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The
coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection
afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
With regard to claims arising from the Consultant's performance of the
work described in this contract, the Consultant's insurance coverage
shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained
by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall apply in
excess of, and not contribute with, the Consultant's insurance.
Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shall
not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers officials, employees
or volunteers.
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to
the limits of the insurer's liability.
Worker's Comoensation and Employers Liability Coveraae. The insurer
shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work
performed by the Consultant for the City.
2/formslARG-04 Rev 1122/92 4- pwO2~pw92-02\geoeoils .mOt 071692
de
Verification of Coveraae. Contractor shall furnish the City with
certificates of insurance effecting coverage required by this clause. The
certificates for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person
authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The
certificates are to be on forms provided by the City and are to be
received and approved by the City before work commences. The City
reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required
insurance policies, at any time.
Consultant shall include all subconsultants as insureds under its policies
or shall furnish separate certificates for each subcontractor. All
coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements
stated herein.
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and
approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall
reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self insured retentions as
respects the City, its officers, officials and employees; or the Consultant
shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related
investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
13.
LICFNSES. The Consultant and subconsultant shall obtain all necessary licenses,
including but not limited to City Business License.
14.
INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless the
City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all
claims, demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the
City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be
imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising
out of Consultant's negligent performance under the terms of this Agreement,
excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City.
15.
ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached
hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or
incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the
subject matter hereof.
In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this
Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement
shall prevail.
EFFECTIVE DATE AND EXECUTION: This Agreement shall be effective from and
after the date it is signed by the representatives of the City. This Agreement may be
executed in counterparts.
2/forme/ARG-O4Rev1122/92 -5- pwO2%pw92-O2%geosoils.egt 071692
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
CONSULTANT
LEIGHTJN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
By: ~.,~~ ~ .//(,~.~.~--t-f~r_/~ ~
Houman MakaPechi. VP/Hanaq~nq PP~nc~pal
Print Name and Title
CITY OF TEMECULA
By
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
S ity Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
2/forrnslARG-04 Rev 1122/92 -6- pwO2kow92-O2\geosoils.egt 071692
EXHIBIT "A"
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
2/formslARG..O4 Rev 1122192 EXHIBIT , A" pw02\pw92-02\geosoils.agt 071692
TABLE 1
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
6920190-04
· INVESTIGATIVE FIELD WORK *
Soil Technician I
Field Supervision
Senior Project Engineer
4 hours @ $52/hour
1 hours @ $77/hour
3 hours @ $90/hour
$208
77
180
* Field work includes: sampling subsurface soils hopefully with one half hours use of the contractors
backhoe to determine the in-situ condition of the roadway soil, perform field density testing in the
excavated trenches for evaluation of density, porosity and possible consolidation parameters.
FIELD WORK (Testing hours have been estimated based upon a Soil Technician I)
Water Line Testing
Curb/Gutter/Cross Gutter
Sidewalk Subgrade
Street Subgrade
Crushed Aggregate Base
Bituminous Pavement
Field Supervisor
1 hours @ $52/hr 52
2 hours @ $52]hr 104
2 hours @ $52/hr 104
2 hours @ $52/hr 104
2 hours @ $52/hr 104
2 hours @ $52/hr 104
3 hours @ $77/hr 231
· LABORATORY TESTING (includes aggregate base tests and subgrade materials)
Maximum Dry Density 4 @ Sll0/each
Sand Equivalent 1 @ $45/each
R-value 1 @ $165/each
Sieve Analysis 1 @ $50/each
440
45
165
50
· ENGINEERING
Pavement Design
1 - Meeting
180
9O
· REPORT
Final Report
Total
800
$3,038.00
EXHIBIT "B*'
EXHIBIT "B"
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
2/formslARG-04 Rev 1122/92 EXHIBIT "B' pwO2\pw92-02\geosoils.agt 071692
LEIGHTON AND A$ X:IATET, INC
.. Gsotechn[c,l end E,whc,,~a~entcl Enei.me~;ng Consultants
" July 1, 1992
Project No. 6920190-04
To:
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: Mr. Jack Hodson
Subject:
Scope of Work and Fixed Fee Costs for Geotechnical Services during Improvements
to Sixth Street, PW92-02, City of Temecula, County of Riverside, California
Introduction
Leighton and Associates, Inc., is pleased to submit this scope of services and associated costs for
geotechnical services to be performed during road improvements to Sixth Street in Temecula. Our
services will include field documentation, laboratory testing, field density testing and engineering
analysis in accordance with the specifications, contract documents and the Standard Specifications for
Public Works Construction, the City of Temecula and prudent industry standards. Our scope of
services are listed below.
Scope of Services
Perform laboratory testing on sampled soils and materials to obtain maximum dry
density/optimum moisture, R-value, Sand Equivalent, Durability Index, and Sieve Analysis
results.
Perform random subsurface sampling and testing to determine present soil conditions for
support of the proposed road improvements.
Prepare a letter based upon the previously mentioned sampling, testing and engineering
analysis.
Prepare pavement design based upon R-value test results obtained from the existing road
surface.
Perform field density testing for street subgrade, crushed aggregate base, water line trench
backfill, curb and gutter subgrade, and sidewalk subgrade.
Summarize our results in a final compaction report at the completion of work performed.
40935 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE, SUITE A, TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92591
EXHIBIT 'A'
(714) 676-0023
FAX (714) 676-6826
6920190-04
Based upon the above listed scope of services and the breakdown of our proposed costs listed on
Table 1 we estimate the geotechnical costs associated with this project to be $3,038.00. The
technician hours are only estimated, actual time will probably vary depending upon the contractor,
the amount of work that will be ready for us to test at one time and retesting time that could occur.
Our services will be conducted on a time and materials basis in the field and documented through
our daily reports.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Respectfully submitted,
Steven P. Afford RCE 34276
Senior Project Engineer
Director of Geology
Distribution: (3) Addressee
Attachment: Table 1 - Payment Schedule
KINIBIT
ITEM NO.
11
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Council/City Manager
Department of Public Works
August 11, 1992
SUBJECT:
Award of Professional Services Contract to Robert Bein, William Frost
and Associates for Survey Services on Sixth Street
(Project No. PW92-02)
PREPARED B~ack
RECOMMENDATION:
Hodson, Senior Public Works Inspector
That the City Council:
Award a professional services contract in the amount of $4,625.00 to Robert Bein, William
Frost and Associates (RBF) for survey services on Sixth Street improvements (Project No.
PW92-02) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said contract.
Transfer $4,625.00 from the Development Impact Fund to the Capital Projects Account and
appropriate $4,625.00 to Capital Projects Account No. 021-165-623-5804.
BACKGROUND:
In January 1992, the Department of Public Works solicited qualifications from interested
engineering firms and formed a qualified short list for the purpose of providing survey work
on City Capital Projects. Subsequent to bidding the Sixth Street project, RBF was requested
to provide a scope of work for this project. A contract with a defined scope of work and a
hourly budget of $4,625.00 has been negotiated to provide survey services on Project No.
PW92-02.
FISCAL IMPACT:
It is necessary to transfer $4,625.00 from the Development Impact Fund to the Capital
Projects Fund and appropriate $4,625.00 to Capital Projects Account No. 021-165-623-5804.
Attachment
Agreement for Professional Services
pwOS~agdrpt~92~081 l~pw92-O2.svy 0720
AGREEMENT
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICF~
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 241h day of June, 1992, between the City
of Temecula,a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as 'City' and Robert Bein, William
Frost & Associates, a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as 'Consultant'.
The parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in Exhibit "A".
PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times, faithfuRRy, industrially and to the best of
his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described herein.
,
PAYMENT. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the hourly rates set forth in
Exhibit "B" attached hereto, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount
will not exceed $4,625.00 for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is
approved by the City Council; provided that the City Manager may approve additional
payment not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the Agreement; but in no event more than
$10,000.00.
Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be
submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the
previous month. Payment shah be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice.
SUSPENSION, TERMINATION OR ABANDONMENT OF AGREEMENT. The City
may, at any time, suspend, terminate or abandon this Agreement, or any portion hereof,
by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of
said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless
the notice provides otherwise. Within thirty-five (35) days after receiving an invoice from
the Consultant, the City shah pay Consultant for work done through the date that work is
to be ceased pursuant to this section.
If the City suspends, terminates or abandons a portion of this Agreement such suspension,
termination or abandonment shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this
Agreement.
2/forms/ARG-04 Rev. 1/9_29/92 1 pw01/agtnts/masters/04 012292
BREACH OF CONTRACT. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the
terms of this Agreement, the City shah have no obligation or duty to continue compensating
Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Default shah include not
performing the tasks described herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager
of the City. Failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work
hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and without fault or
negligence of the Consultant, shah not be considered a default.
If the City Manager or his delegate determined that the Consultant defaults in the
performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shah serve the
Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shah have ten (10) days after
service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory
performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period
of time, the City shah have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement,
to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other
remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.
TERM. This Agreement shah commence on ,19__, and shah remain and
continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than
,19 .
Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between the City
and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shah be resolved by
arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shah be final.
Consultant shah select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired judges
of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration hearing shah be
conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1280, et seq. City and
Consultant shah share the cost of the arbitration equally.
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the event of
termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, aH original documents, designs,
drawings and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed
pursuant to this Agreement shah become the sole property of the City and may be used,
reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant.
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The Consultant is and shah at aH times remain as to
the City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor any of its officers,
employees or agents shah have control over the conduct of the Consultant or any of the
Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as herein set forth. The Consultant shah
not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents
are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City.
No employee benefits shah be available to Consultant in connection with the performance
of this Agreement. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shah not pay salaries, wages,
or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shah
not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising
out of performing services hereunder.
2/forms/ARG-04 Rev. 1/9_29/92 2 pw01/agmts/mastets/04 012292
10.
11.
12.
LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shah keep itself informed of State and
Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way
affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shah at
aH times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers
and employees, shah not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant
to comply with this section.
NOTICE. Whenever it shah be necessary for either party to serve notice on the other
respecting this Agreement, such notice shah be served by certified mail, postage prepaid,
return receipt requested, addressed to the City Manager of the City of Temecula, located
at 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590, and the Consultant at 28765
Single Oak Drive, Suite 250, Temecula California 92590 unless and until different addresses
may be furnished in writing by either party to the other. Notice shah be deemed to have
been served seventy-two (72) hours after the same has been deposited in the United States
Postal Services. This shah be valid and sufficient service of notice for aH purposes.
ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shah not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor
any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the
City.
Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be the value to
the City of the services rendered.
LIABILITY INSURANCE. The Consultant shah maintain insurance acceptable to the City
in full force an effect throughout the term of this contract, against claims for injuries to
persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the perfor-
mance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, his agents, representatives, employees or
subcontractors. Insurance is to be placed with insurer with a Best's rating of no less than
A:VIL The costs of such insurance shall be included in the Contractor's bid. The
Consultant shah provide the following scope and limits of insurance:
A. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shah be at least as broad as:
Insurance Services Office form no. GL-0002 (Ed. 1/73) covering Compre-
hensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL-
0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability; or Insurance
Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage ("occurrence" form
CG-0001).
Insurance Services Office form no. CA-0001 (Ed. 1/78) covering Automobile
Liability, code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA-0025.
2/forms/ARG-04 Rcv. 1/22/92 3 pwO1/agmts/rmutcrs/04 012292
C,
Workers' Compensation insurance as required by Labor Code of the State
of California an Employers' Liability insurance.
4. Errors and Omissions insurance.
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits of insurance no less
than:
General Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily
injury and property damage.
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for
bodily injury and property damage.
Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' compensation
as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers
Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident.
4. Errors and Omissions Insurance: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductible in excess of $1,000 must
be declared to and approved by the City.
Other Insurance Provisions. Insurance policies required by this contract shall
contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
All Policies. Each insurance polity required by this clause shall be endorsed
to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either
party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior
written notice to the City via United States First Class Mail.
b,
General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages. The City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects:
liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant;
products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned,
occupied or used by the Consultant, or automobiles owned, lease, hired or
borrowed by the Consultant The coverage shall contain no special
limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers,
officials, employees or volunteers.
2/forms/ARG-04 Rev. 1/~/92 4 pw01/agmts/masters/04 012292
13.
With regard to claims arising from the Consultant's performance of the work
described in this contract, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be
primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and
volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its
officers, officials, employees or volunteers shah apply in excess of, and not
contribute with, the Consultant's insurance.
Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shah not
affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or
volunteers.
The Consultant's insurance shah apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suite is brought, except with respect to the limits of
the insurer's liability.
Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage. RBF's liability
coverage complies with the laws of the State of California as written.
Verification of Coverage. Contractor shah furnish the City with certificates
of insurance effecting coverage required by this clause. The certificates for
each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer
to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates are to be on forms approved
by the City and are to be received and approved by the City before work
commences. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies
of aH required insurance policies, at any time.
All subconsultants shah furnish separate certificates. All coverages for
subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein.
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved
by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shah reduce or
eliminate such deductibles or self insured retentions as respects the City, its
officers, officials and employees; or the Consultant shall procure a bond
guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administra-
tion and defense expenses.
LICENSES. The Consultant and subconsultant shah obtain aH necessary licenses, including
but not limited to City Business License.
2/forms/ARG-04 Rev. 1/22/92 5 p~l/agmts/masters/04 012292
14.
INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands,
losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and
employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death
of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent performance under
the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the
City.
15.
ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached
hereto or referred to herein integrate all tens and conditions mentioned herein or
incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the subject matter
hereof.
In the event of conflict between the tens, conditions, or provisions of this Agreement and
any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prevail.
EFFECTIVE DATE AND EXECUTION: This Agreement shall be effective from and after
the date it is signed by the representatives of the City. This Agreement may be executed in
counterparts.
2/forms/ARG-04 Rev. 1/22/92, 6 pw01/agmts/msst~ts/04 012292
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
the day and year first above written.
William L. Green. Senior Vice President
Print Name and Title
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field, City t
June S. Greek, City Clerk
2/forms/ARG-04 Rev. 1/22/92 7 pw01/agmts/ma~ters/04 012292
EXHIBIT "A"
J.N. 400420, Revision No. 1
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant agrees to perform the following Scope of Services:
EXHIBIT A-1 SAWCUT LI1M1TS OF PAVEMENT REMOVAL
Consultant shah paint sawcut markings for limits of pavement removal.
EXHIBIT A-2
ROUGH GRADE STAKES
Consultant shah provide one set of rough grade stakes at 50' intervals to grade Sixth Street roadway.
All stakes will be marked to the edge of pavement grade. Cut sheets shah be supplied to Client for
distribution to the Contractor. The request for rough grade staking shall be for the entire job site.
EXHIBIT A-3 BLUETOP STAKES
Consultant shah provide one set of bluetop stakes at 50' intervals for roadway shoulders or subgrade
as coordinated and agreed upon with the Contractor and Consultant. The request for bluetop
stakes shah be for the entire job.
EXHIBIT A4
CURB/DIKE STAKES
Consultant shah provide one set of line and grade stakes for curb and gutter or dike, as per Project
#92-002 Sixth Street improvement plans. These stakes will be located on 25-foot stations. Stakes
will be set with appropriate offsets to the face of curb or dike, as agreed upon by the Contractor
and Consultant. All stakes will be marked to the finish top of curb grade. Cut sheets shall be
supplied to the Client for distribution to the Contractor.
Consultant shah provide one (1) set of three (3) stakes for the construction of each cross gutter.
The stakes shah be set on an offset to the flowline as agreed upon by the Consultant the Consultant
and Contractor and shah be marked with cut or fill to the flowline grade.
Consultant shall place one stake, on line only, for the centerline of driveways. The driveway
location information shall be furnished to Consultant at least twenty-four (24) hours in advance of
staking the respective curb and gutter.
The request for curb and gutter staking shall be for the entire job site.
2/form$/ARG-04 Roy. 1122192 8 pu,Ol/agmti/mauter~/04 012292
EXHIBIT A-5 FIRE HYDRANT RELOCATION STAKES
Consultant shah provide one set of fire hydrant relocation stakes at Station 12 + 51.57.
2/forms/ARG-04 Rev. 1/22/92 9 l~01/agmts/masters/0~ 012292
EXHIBIT "B"
J.N. 400420, Revision No. 1
COMPENSATION
ITEM WORK TASK FEE
A-1 Sawcut Limits of Pavement Removal 600
A-2 Rough Grade Stakes 900
A-3 Bluetop Stakes 1,200
A-4 Curb/Dike Stakes 1,775
A-5 Fire Hydrant Relocation Stakes 150
TOTAL $4,625
Progress billings will be forwarded to the Client and will include the fees earned for the billing
period plus aH direct costs advanced by Consultant such as blueprints, reproductions, Governmental
processing fees, permit fees and additional insurance riders requested by Client.
The Client shah make every reasonable effort to review invoices within thirty (30) working days
from the date of receipt of the invoices and notify Consultant in writing of any particular item that
is alleged to be incorrect.
Consultant shah invoice Client for one (1) "extra" hour of survey supervision time for every eight
(8) hours of "extra" survey crew time charged to Client ("extra" work is understood to be work not
covered by this contract and requested and authorized by the Client or his authorized representa-
tive).
The fees proposed herein shah apply until August 1, 1993. Due to ever-changing costs, Consultant
will increase those portions of the contract fee for which work must still be completed after August
1, 1993 by ten percent (10%).
Any work relating, but not limited to, topographic surveying for earth quantities, "as-constructed"
surveys, staking of sidewalks and flatwork, landscaping, finish grading, retaining walls, ornamental
walls, area drains, or joint trench utilities (except as provided herein), if required, shah be covered
under a separate contract.
2/form~/ARG-04 Rev. 1/9,29/92 l0 pvv01/agmts/masters/04 012292
AGREEMENT
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 241h day of June, 1992, between the City
of Temecula,a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as 'Cit3P and Robert Bein, William
Frost & Associates, a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant'.
The parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
SERVICES. Consultant shah perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
Consultant shah complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in Exhibit "A".
PERFORMANCE. Consultant shah at aH times, faithfully, industrially and to the best of
his ability, experience and talent, perform aH tasks described herein.
PAYMENT. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the hourly rates set forth in
Exhibit "B" attached hereto, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount
will not exceed $4,625.00 for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is
approved by the City Council; provided that the City Manager may approve additional
payment not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the Agreement; but in no event more than
$10,000.00.
Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shah be
submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the
previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice.
,
SUSPENSION. TERMINATION OR ABANDONMENT OF AGREEMENT. The City
may, at any time, suspend, terminate or abandon this Agreement, or any portion hereof,
by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of
said notice, the Consultant shah immediately cease aH work under this Agreement, unless
the notice provides otherwise. Within thirty-five (35) days after receiving an invoice from
the Consultant, the City shah pay Consultant for work done through the date that work is
to be ceased pursuant to this section.
If the City suspends, terminates or abandons a portion of this Agreement such suspension,
termination or abandonment shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this
Agreement.
2/forms/ARG-04 Rev. 1/~/92 1 pw01/agmts/master~/04 01~92
BREACH OF CONTRACT. In the event that Comfitant is-in default for cause under the
terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating
Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Default shall include not
performing the tasks described herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager
of the City. Failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work
hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and without fault or
negligence of the Consultant, shah not be considered a default.
If the City Manager or his delegate determined that the Consultant defaults in the
performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the
Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have ten (10) days after
service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory
performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period
of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement,
to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other
remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.
TERM. This Agreement shall commence on ,19__, and shall remain and
continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than
Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between the City
and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall be resolved by
arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final.
Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired judges
of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration hearing shall be
conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1280, et seq. City and
Consultant shall share the cost of the arbitration equally.
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the event of
termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, all original documents, designs,
drawings and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be pedormed
pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used,
reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant.
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to
the City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor any of its officers,
employees or agents shah have control over the conduct of the Consultant or any of the
Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as herein set forth. The Consultant shall
not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents
are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City.
No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance
of this Agreement. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages,
or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall
not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising
out of performing services hereunder.
2/forms/ARG-04 Rev. 1/22/92 2 pwO1/agmts/masters/O4 012292
,
10.
11.
12.
LEGAL R!~.SPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and
Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way
affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at
all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers
and employees, shah not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant
to comply with this section.
NOTICE. Whenever it shah be necessary for either party to serve notice on the other
respecting this Agreement, such notice shah be served by certified mail, postage prepaid,
return receipt requested, addressed to the City Manager of the City of Temecula, located
at 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590, and the Consultant at 28765
Single Oak Drive, Suite 250, Temecula California 92590 unless and until different addresses
may be furnished in writing by either party to the other. Notice shall be deemed to have
been served seventy-two (72) hours after the same has been deposited in the United States
Postal Services. This shah be valid and sufficient service of notice for all purposes.
ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor
any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the
City.
Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be the value to
the City of the services rendered.
LIABILITY INSURANCE. The Consultant shall maintain insurance acceptable to the City
in full force an effect throughout the term of this contract, against claims for injuries to
persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the perfor-
mance of the work hereunder by the Consultant his agents, representatives, employees or
subcontractors. Insurance is to be placed with insurer with a Best's rating of no less than
A:VII. The costs of such insurance shah be included in the Contractor's bid. The
Consultant shah provide the following scope and limits of insurance:
A. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shah be at least as broad as:
Insurance Services Office form no. GL-0002 (Ed. 1/73) covering Compre-
hensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL-
0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability; or Insurance
Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage ("occurrence" form
CG-0001).
Insurance Services Office form no. CA-0001 (Ed. 1/78) covering Automobile
Liability, code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA-0025.
2/forms/ARG-04 Rev. 1/22/92 3 pw01/agmts/masters/04 012292
C,
Workers' Compensation insurance as required by Labor Code of the State
of California an Employers' Liability insurance.
4. Errors and Omissions insurance.
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shah maintain limits of insurance no less
than:
General Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily
injury and property damage.
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for
bodily injury and property damage.
Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' compensation
as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers
Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident.
Errors and Omissions Insurance: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductible in excess of $1,000 must'
be declared to and approved by the City.
Other Insurance Provisions. Insurance policies required by this contract shah
contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
a,
All Policies. Each insurance polity required by this clause shah be endorsed
to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canoeled by either
party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior
written notice to the City via United States First Class Mail.
General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages. l~he City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects:
liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant;
products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned,
occupied or used by the Consultant, or automobiles owned, lease, hired or
borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shah contain no special
limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers,
officials, employees or volunteers.
2/forms/ARG-04 Roy. 1/22/92 4 pw01/agmts/mastcrs/04 019292
13.
With regard to claims arising from the Consultant's performance of the work
described in this contract, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be
primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and
volunteers. Any insurance or serf-insurance maintained by the City, its
officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall apply in excess of, and not
contribute with, the Consultant's insurance.
Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shall not
affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or
volunteers.
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suite is brought, except with respect to the limits of
the insurer's liability.
Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage. RBF's liability
coverage complies with the laws of the State of California as written.
Verification of Coverage. Contractor shah furnish the City with certificates
of insurance effecting coverage required by this clause. The certificates for
each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer
to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates are to be on forms approved
by the City and are to be received and approved by the City before work
commences. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies
of all required insurance policies, at any time.
All subconsultants shall furnish separate certificates. All coverages for
subcontractors shah be subject to all of the requirements stated herein.
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved
by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shah reduce or
eliminate such deductibles or self insured retentions as respects the City, its
officers, officials and employees; or the Consultant shah procure a bond
guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administra-
tion and defense expenses.
LICENSES. The Consultant and subconsultant shal/obtain all necessary licenses, including
but not limited to City Business License.
2/form~/ARG-04 Rev. 1/22/92 5 pw01/agmts/masters/04 012292
14.
INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands,
losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and
employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death
of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent performance under
the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the
City.
15.
ENTIRF- AI3RF. EMENT. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached
hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or
incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the subject matter
hereof.
In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this Agreement and
any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shah prevail.
EFFECTIVE DATE AND EXECUTION: This Agreement shah be effective from and after
the date it is signed by the representatives of the City. This Agreement may be executed in
counterparts.
2/form~/ARG-04 R~-v. 1/~/92 6 pw01/agmts/m~tcrs/04 012292
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
the day and year farst above written.
William L. Green. Senior Vice President
Print Name and Title
CITY OF TEMECUI~
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
ATIT~T:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
2/forms/ARG-04 Rev. 1/22/92 7 pw01/agmts/maste~/IM 012292
EXHIBIT "A"
J.N. 400420, Revision No. 1
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant agrees to perform the following Scope of Services:
EXHIBIT A-1 SAWCUT LIMITS OF PAVEMENT REMOVAL
Consultant shah paint sawcut markings for limits of pavement removal.
EXHIBIT A-2
ROUGH GRADE STAKES
Consultant shah provide one set of rough grade stakes at 50' intervals to grade Sixth Street roadway.
All stakes will be marked to the edge of pavement grade. Cut sheets shah be supplied to Client for
distribution to the Contractor. The request for rough grade staking shah be for the entire job site.
EXHIBIT A-3
BLUETOP STAKES
Consultant shah provide one set of bluetop stakes at 50' intervals for roadway shoulders or subFade
as coordinated and agreed upon with the Contractor and Consultant. The request for bluetop
stakes shah be for the entire job.
EXHIBIT A-4
CURB/DIKE STAKES
Consultant shah provide one set of line and grade stakes for curb and gutter or dike, as per Project
#92-002 Sixth Street improvement plans. These stakes will be located on 25-foot stations. Stakes
will be set with appropriate offsets to the face of curb or dike, as agreed upon by the Contractor
and Consultant. All stakes will be marked to the finish top of curb grade. Cut sheets shall be
supplied to the Client for distribution to the Contractor.
Consultant shah provide one (1) set of three (3) stakes for the construction of each cross gutter.
The stakes shah be set on an offset to the flowline as agreed upon by the Consultant the Consultant
and Contractor and shah be marked with cut or fiJ/to the flowline grade.
Consultant shah place one stake, on line only, for the centerline of driveways. The driveway
location information shah be furnished to Consultant at least twenty-four (24) hours in advance of
staking the respective curb and gutter.
The request for curb and gutter staking shah be for the entire job site.
2/forms/ARG-04 R~v. 1/22/92
8
p~l/agmts/mastcrs/04 012292
EXHIBIT A-5 . FIRE HYDRANT RELOCATION STAKES
Consultant shall provide one set of fire hydrant relocation stakes at Station 12+51.57.
2/forms/ARG-04 Rev. 1/22/92 9 pw01/agmts/masters/04 012292
EXHIBIT "B"
J.N. 400420, Revision No. 1
COMPENSATION
ITEM WORK TASK FEE
A-1 Sawcut Limits of Pavement Removal 600
A-2 Rough Grade Stakes 900
A-3 Bluetop Stakes 1,200
A-4 Curb/Dike Stakes 1,775
A-5 Fire Hydrant Relocation Stakes 150
TOTAL $4,625
Progress billings will be forwarded to the Client and will include the fees earned for the billing
period plus aH direct costs advanced by Consultant such as blueprints, reproductions, Governmental
processing fees, permit fees and additional insurance riders requested by Client.
The Client shah make every reasonable effort to review invoices within thirty (30) working days
from the date of receipt of the invoices and notify Consultant in writing of any particular item that
is alleged to be incorrect.
Consultant shah invoice Client for one (1) "extra" hour of survey supervision time for every eight
(8) hours of "extra" survey crew time charged to Client ("extra" work is understood to be work not
covered by this contract and requested and authorized by the Client or his authorized representa-
tire).
The fees proposed herein shah apply until August 1, 1993. Due to ever-changing costs, Consultant
will increase those portions of the contract fee for which work must still be completed after August
1, 1993 by ten percent (10%).
Any work relating, but not limited to, topographic surveying for earth quantities, "as-constructed"
surveys, staking of sidewalks and flatwork, landscaping, finish grading, retaining walls, ornamental
walls, area drains, or joint trench utilities (except as provided herein), if required, shall be covered
under a separate contract.
2/forms/ARG-04 Rev. 1/22/92 l0 pw01/agmts/masters/04 012292
AGREEMENT
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 241h day of June, 1992, between the City
of Temecula,a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as 'City' and Robert Bein, William
Frost & Associates, a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as 'Consultant'.
The parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in Exhibit "A".
PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best of
his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described herein.
PAYMENT. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the hourly rates set forth in
Exhibit "B" attached hereto, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount
will not exceed $4,625.00 for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is
approved by the City Council; provided that the City Manager may approve additional
payment not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the Agreement; but in no event ,more than
$10,000.00.
Consultant wil/submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shah be
submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the
previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice.
SUSPENSION. TERMINATION OR ABANDONMENT OF AGREEMENT. The City
may, at any time, suspend, terminate or abandon this Agreement, or any portion hereof,
by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of
said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless
the notice provides otherwise. Within thirty-five (35) days after receiving an invoice from
the Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for work done through the date that work is
to be ceased pursuant to this section.
If the City suspends, terminates or abandons a portion of this Agreement such suspension,
termination or abandonment shah not make void or invalidate the remainder of this
Agreement.
-- 2/forms/ARG-04 Rev. 1/22/92 I pw01/agmt$/mastet~/04 012292
BREACH OF CONTRACT. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the
terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating
Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Default shall include not
performing the tasks described herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager
of the City. Failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work
hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and without fault or
negligence of the Consultant, shall not be considered a default.
If the City Manager or his delegate determined that the Consultant defaults in the
performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shah serve the
Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shah have ten (10) days after
service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory
performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period
of time, the City shah have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement,
to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other
remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.
TERM. This Agreement shall commence on 19 and shall remain and
continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than
,19 .
Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between the City
and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shaH.. be resolved by
arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shah be final.
Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired judges
of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration hearing shall be
conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1280, et seq. City and
Consultant shall share the cost of the arbitration equally.
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMEN'I~. Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the event of
termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, all original documents, designs,
drawings and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed
pursuant to this Agreement shah become the sole property of the City and may be used,
reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant.
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The Consultant is and shah at all times remain as to
the City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor any of its officers,
employees or agents shah have control over the conduct of the Consultant or any of the
Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as herein set forth. The Consultant shall
not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents
are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City.
No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance
of this Agreement. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages,
or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall
not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising
out of performing services hereunder.
2/forms/ARG-04 Rev. 1/22/92 2 pw01/agmts/masters/04 01~92 '-~
LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shah keep itself informed of State and
Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way
affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at
all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers
and employees, shah not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant
to comply with this section.
10.
NOTICE. Whenever it shall be necessary for either party to serve notice on the other
respecting this Agreement, such notice shall be served by certified mail, postage prepaid,
return receipt requested, addressed to the City Manager of the City of Temecula, located
at 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590, and the Consultant at 28765
Single Oak Drive, Suite 250, Temecula California 92590 unless and until different addresses
may be furnished in writing by either party to the other. Notice shall be deemed to have
been served seventy-two (72) hours after the same has been deposited in the United States
Postal Services. This shall be valid and sufficient service of notice for all purposes.
11.
ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shah not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor
any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the
City.
Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be the value to
the City of the services rendered. .- ..
12.
LIABILITY INSURANCE. The Consultant shah maintain insurance acceptable to the City
in full force an effect throughout the term of this contract, against claims for injuries to
persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the perfor-
mance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, his agents, representatives, employees or
subcontractors. Insurance is to be placed with insurer with a Best's rating of no less than
A:VII. The costs of such insurance shall be included in the Contractor's bid. The
Consultant shah provide the following scope and limits of insurance:
A. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shah be at least as broad as:
Insurance Services Office form no. GL-0002 (Ed. 1/73) covering Compre-
hensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL-
0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability; or Insurance
Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage ("occurrence" form
CG-0001).
Insurance Services Office form no. CA-0001 (Ed. 1/78) covering Automobile
Liability, code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA-0025.
~ 2/forms/ARG-04 P,~v. 1/22/92 3 pw01/agmts/masters/04 012292
s
Workers' Compensation insurance as required by Labor Code of the State
of California an Employers' Liability insurance.
4. Errors and Omissions insurance.
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shah maintain limits of insurance no less
than:
General Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily
injury and property damage.
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for
bodily injury and property damage.
s
Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' compensation
as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers
Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident.
4. Errors and Omissions Insurance: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductible in excess of $1,000 must
be declared to and approved by the City. ,
Other Insurance Provisions. Insurance policies required by this contract shah
contain or be endorsed to contain the foBowing provisions:
as
All Policies. Each insurance polity required by this clause shah be endorsed
to state that coverage shah not be suspended, voided, canceled by either
party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior
written notice to the City via United States First Class Mail.
General Liabilitv and Automobile Liabilitv Coverages. The City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects:
liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant;
products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned,
occupied or used by the Consultant or automobiles owned, lease, hired or
borrowed by the Consultant The coverage shah contain no special
limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers,
officials, employees or volunteers.
2/forms/ARG-04 Rev. 1/~/92 4 i~uO1/agmts/rnastezs/~ 01~92 "",
13.
With regard to claims arising from the Consultant's performance of the work
described in this contract, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be
primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and
volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its
officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall apply in excess of, and not
contribute with, the Consultant's insurance.
Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shah not
affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or
volunteers.
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suite is brought, except with respect to the limits of
the insurer's liability.
Worker's Compensation and Emplo.vers Liability Coverage. RBF's liability
coverage complies with the laws of the State of California as written.
Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with certificates
of insurance effecting coverage required by this clause. The certificates for
each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer
to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates are to be on forms approved
by the City and are to be received and approved by the City. before work
commences. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies
of all required insurance policies, at any time.
A//subconsultants shah furnish separate certificates. All coverages for
subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein.
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved
by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or
eliminate such deductibles or self insured retentions as respects the City, its
officers, officials and employees; or the Consultant shall procure a bond
guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administra-
tion and defense expenses.
LICENSES. The Consultant and subconsultant shall obtain all necessary licenses, including
but not limited to City Business License.
~ 2/forms/ARG-04 Rev. 1/~/92 5 pw01/agmts/masters/04 01229'2
14.
INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands,
losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and
employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death
of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent performance under
the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the
City.
15.
ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached
hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or
incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the subject matter
hereof.
In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this Agreement and
any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prevail.
EFFECTIVE DATE AND EXECUTION: This Agreement shah be effective from and after
the date it is signed by the representatives of the City. This Agreement may be executed in
counterparts.
2/forn~/ARG-04 Rev. 1/22/92_ 6 pw01/agmt~/mastcr~/04 012292
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
the day and year first above written.
William L. Green. Senior Vice President
Print Name and Title
CITY OF TEMECULA
By
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
ATIK~T:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
~ 2/forms/ARG-04 Rev. 1/22/92 7 pw01/agmts/mastcrs/04 012292
EXHIBIT "A"
J.N. 400420, Revision No.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant agrees to perform the following Scope of Services:
EXHIBIT A-1 SAWCUT LIE OF PAVEMENT REMOVAL
Consultant shah paint sawcut markings for limits of pavement removal.
EXHIBIT A-2
ROUGH GRADE STAKES
Consultant shah provide one set of rough grade stakes at 50' intervals to grade Sixth Street roadway.
All stakes will be marked to the edge of pavement grade. Cut sheets shall be supplied to Client for
distribution to the Contractor. The request for rough grade staking shall be for the entire job site.
EXHIBIT A-3 BLUETOP STAKES
Consultant shall provide one set of bluetop stakes at 50' intervals for roadway shoulders or subgrade
as coordinated and agreed upon with the Contractor and Consultant. The request for bluetop
stakes shall be for the entire job. "
EXHIBIT A-4
CURB/DIKE STAKES
Consultant shall provide one set of line and grade stakes for curb and gutter or dike, as per Project
#92-002 Sixth Street improvement plans. These stakes will be located on 25-foot stations. Stakes
will be set with appropriate offsets to the face of curb or dike, as agreed upon by the Contractor
and Consultant. All stakes will be marked to the finish top of curb grade. Cut sheets shall be
supplied to the Client for distribution to the Contractor.
Consultant shall provide one (1) set of three (3) stakes for the construction of each cross gutter.
The stakes shall be set on an offset to the flowline as agreed upon by the Consultant the Consultant
and Contractor and shall be marked with cut or fill to the flowline grade.
Consultant shall place one stake, on line only, for the centerline of driveways. The driveway
location information shall be furnished to Consultant at least twenty-four (24) hours in advance of
staking the respective curb and gutter.
The request for curb and gutter staking shall be for the entire job site.
2/forms/ARG-04 Rev. 1/22/92 8 !~O1/agmt~/master~/04 012299- ~'
EXHIBIT A-S FIRE HYDRANT RELOCATION STAKES
Consultant shah provide one set of fire hydrant relocation stakes at Station 12+ 51.57.
~ 2/forms/ARG.-04 Ik-v. 1/22/92 9 p~v01/agmts/mast=r~/04 019_..992_
EXHIBIT "B"
J.N. 400420, Revision No. 1
COMPENSATION
ITEM WORK TASK FEE
A-1 Sawcut Limits of Pavement Removal " 600
A-2 Rough Grade Stakes 900
A-3 Bluetop Stakes 1,200
A-4 Curb/Dike Stakes 1,775
A-5 Fire Hydrant Relocation Stakes 150
TOTAL $4,625
Progress billings will be forwarded to the CHent and will include the fees earned for the billing
period plus aH direct costs advanced by Consultant such as blueprints, reproductions, Governmental
processing fees, permit fees and additional insurance riders requested by Client.
The Client shall make every reasonable effort to review invoices within thirty (30) working days
from the date of receipt of the invoices and notify Consultant in writing of any particular item that
is alleged to be incorrect.
Consultant shah invoice Client for one (1) "extra" hour of survey supervision time for every eight
(8) hours of "extra" survey crew time charged to Client ("extra" work is understood to be work not
covered by this contract and requested and authorized by the Client or his authorized representa-
tire).
The fees proposed herein shah apply until August 1, 1993. Due to ever-changing costs, Consultant
will increase those portions of the contract fee for which work must still be completed after August
1, 1993 by ten percent (10%).
Any work relating, but not limited to, topographic surveying for earth quantities, "as-constructed"
surveys, staking of sidewalks and flatwork, landscaping, finish grading, retaining walls, ornamental
walls, area drains, or joint trench utilities (except as provided herein), if required, shah be covered
under a separate contract.
2/forms/ARC-04' Rev. 1I~/92 .. 10 pw01tagmts/mast=rs/04 012292
ITEM NO. 12
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
,4'p5 Department of Public Works
August 11, 1992
Acceptance of Public Improvements in Tract No. 21764
PREPARED BY: ~ Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council ACCEPT the Public Improvements in Tract No. 21764, AUTHORIZE the
reduction of Faithful Performance Sewer System Bond and release of the Subdivision
Monumentation Bond, ACCEPT the Faithful Performance Maintenance Rider, APPROVE the
subdivision agreement rider, DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the clerk of the Board of
Supervisors.
BACKGROUND:
On December 6, 1988, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision
agreements with:
Warmington Homes
119 N. Maple Street, Suite M
Corona, CA 91720
for the installation of sewer system, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the
subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by:
as follows:
Developers Insurance Company
Bond No. 960239S in the amount of $51,000.00 to cover sewer improvements.
Bond No. 960239S in the amount of $25,500.00 to cover material and labor.
Bond No. 960240S in the amount of $8,100.00 to cover subdivision monumentation.
Page 1 of 2 pw02\egdrpt%92\0811%21764 080392 12:20
The following items have been completed by the developer or his engineer in accordance with
the approved plans:
Required street, sewer, and water improvements within Tract No. 21764
Required subdivision monumentation
The affected streets are a portion of Del Rey Road and Calle Pir~a Colada.
Street and water system improvements are secured as a portion of faithful performance and
material and labor bond amounts for Tract No. 20881. Those several bonds will be
reduced/released when all required improvements in Tract No. 20881 are completed and
accepted by City Council·
The inspection and verification process relating to the above items has been completed by the
County of Riverside Road Department and City Staff agrees with the recommendation to
reduce the subdivision improvement bond and to release the subdivision monumentation bond.
Therefore, it is appropriate to reduce/release this bond as follows:
Sewer: $45,900.00
The remaining 10% of the original Faithful Performance Bond amount is to be retained for one
(1) year guaranteed period as follows:
Sewer: $5,100.00
The developer has submitted a Faithful Performance Maintenance Rider designating the City
of Temecula as obligee. City Council acceptance of this Maintenance Bond Rider will permit
the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to release the Faithful Performance Bond for this item
of work. The Materials and Labor Bond will remain in effect pending City Council exoneration.
AC:skg
Attachments:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Maintenance Bonds
3. Subdivision Agreement
Pege 2 of 2 pwO2\agdrpt%92%0811\21764 080392 12:20
pROJECT
T,(ACT N°-..
VICINITY HAP
I10 St, AL~
L
BOUNDARY AND INDEX HAP
NOTE: SLEET miNKIt SNOHII THt/.$ 41~
ITEM NO. 13
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Department of Public Works
August 11, 1992
Release a Portion of Faithful Performance Bonds and Material and
Labor Bonds in Parcel Map No. 23496
PREPARED BY-' ~ Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council authorize the release of a portion of the street/drainage Faithful
Performance Bonds and Labor and Material Bonds in Parcel Map No. 23496 and direct the City
Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety.
BACKGROUND:
On December 18, 1990, the City Council entered into subdivision agreements with:
Bedford Development Company
28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590
for the improvement of streets/drainage, the installation of water and sewer systems, and
setting of Survey Monuments. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds,
issued by Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, as follows:
Street and Drainage
Water
Sewer
Survey Monuments
FAITHFUL
PERFORMANCE
$3,102,758.40
110,664.00
26,371.20
$9,804.00
LABOR AND
MATERIAL
$1,551,379.20
55,332.00
13,185.60
Page 1 of I pwO2\agdrpt%92%0811%23496 073192 8:45
The street/drainage bonding is comprised of three separate bonds guaranteeing the
improvement of Ynez Road, the interior streets, and the Empire Creek storm drainage system.
Ynez Road - Bond No. 3S 743 533 00 in the amount of $338,440.80
Interior Streets - Bond No. 3S 743 531 00 in the amount of $904,149.00
Empire Creek Storm Drainage - Bond No. 3S 743 532 00 in the amount of
$1,860,168.00
The Ynez Road improvements were bonded to assure the construction of frontage
improvements should Community Facilities District 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) be unable to proceed
in a timely manner.
The issuance of these CFD 88-12 bonds now assures the improvement of Ynez Road including
the subject improvements fronting Parcel Map No. 23496.
Staff therefore recommends the release of the appropriate Faithful Performance and Labor and
Material Bonds in the amounts of $338,440.80, and $169,220.40 respectively (Bond No.
3S 743 533 00).
The remaining Faithful Performance, Labor and Material, and Survey monument bonds will
remain in place until the work is complete, the City Council accepts the improvements, the
warranty period has run, and the City Council authorizes partial and full releases.
Attachment: Vicinity Map
Page 2 of 2 pwO2\agdrpt\92\0811%23496 073192 8:45
VICINITT
#.~.S.
~ITE
t~C~L A4~ f~
No. ~496
MRP
ITEM NO.
14
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~
FINANCE OFFICE
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Department of Public Works
August 11, 1992
Release Faithful Performance Securities and Material and Labor
Securities in Parcel Map No. 23354
PREPARED BY:
dif~A, Ibert Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council authorize the release of street/drainage, sewer and water system
Faithful Performance Letters of Credit, and Material and Labor Letters of Credit in Parcel Map
No. 23354 and direct the City Clerk to so advise the clerk of the Board of Supervisors.
BACKGROUND:
On September 30, 1988, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision
agreements with:
Tomond Properties, A General Partnership
P. O. Box 2159
Escondido, CA 92125
for the improvement of street/drainage, the installation of water and sewer systems, and
setting of Subdivision Monuments. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were Letters
of Credit, issued by Torrey Pines Bank as follows:
Letter of Credit No. 01-800371-01 in the amount $414,500 to cover street/drainage
improvements.
Letter of Credit No. 01-800371-01 in the amount of $81,000 to cover water
improvements.
Letter of Credit No. 01-800371-01 in the amount of $34,000 to cover sewer
improvements.
Page 1 of 1 pw02%agdrpt~92~0811~23354 073192 10:30
Letter of Credit No. 01-800372-01 in the amount of $264,750 to cover Material and
Labor.
Letter of Credit No. 01-800370-01 in the amount of $15,100.00 to cover setting of
lot stakes and subdivision monuments.
On December 18, 1990, the City Council accepted the required street, water, and sewer
improvements and authorized the reduction of the improvement securities and initiated the
warranty period. The developer later discovered that the public improvements and related
costs might be eligible for reimbursement under the provisions of City Council Resolution
No. 90-30, Section 4 - "Facilities to be Financed", and under the auspices of Community
Facilities District No. 88-12 (Ynez Corridor). He then requested that the City Council rescind
its earlier acceptance of the public improvements, which action was taken by the City Council
on January 15, 1991. Determination of refundable costs, execution of necessary agreements,
and acquisition of the public improvements have now been completed.
Therefore, staff recommends that the Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Letters of
Credit be released.
The Subdivision Monumentation Letter of Credit will remain in effect until City staff has
completed the appropriate review and inspection, recommends release of securities, and the
City Council authorizes release.
Attachment: Vicinity Map
Page 2 of 2 pwO2~agdrpt~92\O811~23354 073192 10:30
Pro]eel Sile
VICINITY' MAP
no soole
Sec. 35 ond c~6# T 7'S, RoT ~V
ITEM NO. 15
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: /1~~ Department of Public Works
DATE: August 11, 1992
SUBJECT: Release of Material and Labor Bonds in Parcel Map No. 23561-1
PREPARED BY: ~l~Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council authorize the release of Material and Labor Bonds in Parcel Map
No. 23561-1 and direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors.
BACKGROUND:
On June 13, 1989, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision
agreements with
Bedford Development Company
28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590
for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision
monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by
Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company as follows:
1. Bond No. 3S74009100 in the amount of $1,138,000.00 to cover street
improvements.
2. Bond No. 3S74009100 in the amount of $102,000.00 to cover water improvements.
3. Bond No. 3S74009100 in the amount of $74,000.00 to cover sewer improvements.
4. Bond No. 3S74009400 in the amount of $657,000.00 to cover material and labor.
5. Bond No. 3S74009200 in the amount of $8,000.00 to cover subdivision
monumentation.
Page I of 2 pwO2~agdrpt~,92~0811\23561-1 73192 8:30
On March 10, 1992, the City Council accepted these improvements and retained the following
secured amounts for a one (1) year maintenance period:
Streets: $113,800.00
Water: $10,200.00
Sewer: $7.400.00
TOTAL: $131,400.00
The developer is required to post Material and Labor Bonds to ensure payment to suppliers and
workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by statute
after the Governmental Agency has accepted the public improvements. The Riverside County
Transportation Department and City Staff indicate that no liens have been filed against this
project and with the period in excess of the statutory lien period having run, Staff
recommends that this Material and Labor Bond be released.
The Faithful Performance Warranty Bond (No. 3S74473000) will be retained for a full one (1)
year warranty period (March 10, 1993).
The affected streets are a portion of Jefferson Avenue, Sanborn Avenue, Madison Avenue and
Buecking Drive.
Attachment: Vicinity Map
Page 2 of 2 pw02\agdrpt\92\0811\23561-1 73192 8:30
//
/
/
/
/
/
N.T.S.
VICINITY MAP
SECTION 26; T.7S., R.;5 W.,
S.B.B.M.
ITEM
APPROVAT.
CITY ATTORNEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Department of Public Works
August 11, 1992
Release of Material and Labor Bonds in Tract No. 23561-2
PREPARED BY: }Nl~Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council authorize the release of Material and Labor Bonds in Parcel Map
No. 23561-2 and direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
BACKGROUND:
On December 4, 1990, the City Council entered into subdivision agreements with
Bedford Development Company
28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590
for the improvements of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision
monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by
Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company as follows:
2.
3.
4.
5.
Bond No. 743 462 00 the amount of $842,000.00 to cover street improvements.
Bond No. 743 462 00 in the amount of $142,000.00 to cover water improvements.
Bond No. 743 462 00 in the amount of $173,000.00 to cover sewer improvements.
Bond No. 743 462 00 and in the amount of $578,500.00 to cover material and labor·
Bond No. 743 458 00 in the amount of $10,500.00 to cover subdivision
monumentation.
Pep 1 of 2 pwO2%agdrpt%92%0811%23561-2 3:20
On March 10, 1992, the City Council accepted these improvements and retained the following
secured amounts for a one (1) year maintenance period:
Streets: $84,200.00
Water: $14,200.00
Sewer: $17,300.00
TOTAL: $115,700.00
The developer is required to post Material and Labor Bonds to ensure payment to suppliers and
workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by statute
after the Governmental Agency has accepted the public improvements. City Staff indicate
that no liens have been filed against this project and with the period in excess of the statutory
lien period having run, Staff recommends that this Material and Labor Bond be released.
The Faithful Performance Maintenance Warranty Bond (No. 3S 744 731 00) will be retained
for a full one (1) year warranty period (March 10, 1993).
The affected streets are McCabe Court and a portion of Jefferson Avenue, Madison Avenue
and Buecking Drive.
Attachment: Vicinity Map
Page 2 of 2 pw02%agdrpt\92%0811%23561-2 3:20
ITEM
17
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Planning Department
August 11, 1992
Change of Zone No. 5631 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 25320
PREPARED BY:
Debbie Ubnoske
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council continue Change of Zone
No. 5631 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 25320 to August
25, 1992.
ANALYSIS
Change of Zone No. 5631 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 25320 were previously before
the City Council on October 8, 1991, November 12, 1991, December 10, 1991, January 14,
1992, March 10, 1992, April 14, 1992 and June 9, 1992. These items were continued at
the applicants' request. The item is once again being continued to August 25, 1992.
vgw
S\STAFFRFr\5631 CZ. CC8
t bert c'Beirt , c'William c'Frost c ssociates
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS & SURVEYORS
J.N. 25800
August 5, 1992
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council
City of Ternecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Subject:
Vesting Tentative Tract No. 25320/Change of
Zone No. 5631 - Bedford Development Company
Dear Mayor Birdsall and Councilmembers:
Vesting Tentative Tract No. 25320 and Change of Zone No. 5631 are scheduled for hearing
before the City Council on August 11, 1992. The City has just recently submitted an offer
to acquire the property from the applicant. To allow additional time for Bedford
Development Company to review and respond to the City's acquisition offer, we respectfully
request that this item be continued to the August 25, 1992 meeting.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
/
Robert B. Kemble
Director of Planning
Temecula Regional Office
CC:
June Greek - City Clerk
Dave Dixon - City Manager
Gary Thornhill - Planning Director
Csaba Ko - Bedford Development Company
RBK:dd
28765 SINGLE OAK DRIVE · SUITE 250 , TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA 92590 · (714) 676-8042 · FAX (714) 676-7240
OFFICES IN IRVINE * CORONA , PALM DESERT , SACRAMENTO · SAN DIEGO
ITEM NO. 18
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Planning Department
August 11, 1992
Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs
PREPARF~D BY:
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
RECOMMP~NDATION: It is requested that the City Council:
ADOFr the attached ordinance entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 348
PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF TEMPORARY
SIGNS." and
ADOPT the attached resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING A FEE FOR THE PROCESSING OF
PERMITS FOR TEMPORARY SIGNS".
BACKGROUND:
In August, 1991, City Staff conducted enforcement activities against illegal temporary signs in
commercial areas of the City. The enforcement campaign resulted in letters of violation being
sent to a large number of business owners who had erected banners, sandwich boards, and other
illegal temporary signs. The City's enforcement efforts resulted in numerous complaints from
the local business community. As a result of these complaints, a committee of business people
and City Staff was established to develop appropriate standards for temporary signs. The
Temporary Sign Committee met four times between December, 1991, and June, 1992, and the
Old Town Temporary Sign Working Group met in June, 1992 to discuss appropriate sign
standards.
~ S~SIGN~OMM~TEMPSI(3N.AR i
DISCUSSION:
It is Staff' s opinion that the proposed ordinance, represents a consensus of the members of the
Temporary Sign Committee and the Old Town Temporary Sign Working Group who attended
the meetings. Because the proposed ordinance represents a consensus, not all of the Committee
and Working Group members were in complete agreement with every provision. However,
when taken as a whole, they are generally satisfied with the proposed ordinance.
The standards in the proposed ordinance provide simple and concise standards that will enable
over-the-counter permitting and a minimal permit fee. The provisions of the proposed ordinance
are described in the matrices contained in Attachments 1 and 2. Attachment 1 displays the
temporary sign standards for the areas outside of Old Town. Attachment 2 contains the
temporary sign standards for historic Old Town Temecula.
The other main theme was for an inexpensive permit fee to accompany the simplified permitting
process. As a result, City Staff recommends that a minimal permit fee for each temporary sign
application be established. Staff recommends that a permit processing fee of $20 be established
by the City Council. The attached Resolution establishes a $20.00 fee for attached temporary
signs.
The only significant area of disagreement within the Temporary Sign Committee, was the
question of whether or not to allow temporary signs that are detached from the building where
the business use is located. After lengthy discussions, the Committee was unable to arrive at
a consensus on the standards or criteria for detached temporary signs. As a result, Staff did not
include detached temporary signs in the proposed ordinance because of the lack of clear
Committee agreement on the what the standards should be, the complexity of the permitting and
enforcement processes, and the potential liability problems which could occur with detached
temporary signs.
To date, the City Planning Department has received four letters commenting on the issue of
temporary signs and the proposed Ordinance. The first letter is from the Temecula Valley
Chamber of Commerce stating that it supports the proposed ordinance. The second letter was
sent to City Manager David Dixon by Donald M. Clark, an area resident and operator of three
Wendy's restaurants in Los Angeles. He stated that he did not believe that temporary signs are
the solution to the business problems in Temecula. The third letter is from James Futcher,
owner of the Subway Sandwich Shop and member of the Temporary Sign Committee, stating
his support of the proposed ordinance. The fourth letter is from Mr. Greg Treadwell, the owner
of Granny's Bakery and member of the Temporary Sign Committee, opposing the proposed
ordinance.
CONCLUSION:
The ordinance as proposed represents a collaboration of the public and private sectors and is a
consensus of the members of the Temporary Sign Committee, the Old Town Merchants
Associate and the Old Town Local Review Board who artended the various meetings.
S~SIGNCOMM~TEMPSIGN .AR 2
The proposed Ordinance Regulating Temporan/Signs would add Sections 19.9 and 19.10, to
Article XIX (Advertising Regulations) of Ordinance 348, and provide standards to:
· Allow appropriate types of temporary signs;
· Establish special standards for temporary signs in Old Town;
· Provide for a simplified and streamlined permit process; and,
· Authorize the fee for Temporary Signs Permits.
The ordinance as proposed does not apply to real estate for sale, lease or for rent signs,
temporary political signs, or ambient air balloons. These signs are aiready regulated by the
provisions Article XIX.
Staff finds it probable that the proposed Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs will probably
be consistent with, and not interfere with the implementation of the City's General Plan and the
Old Town Specific Plan when they are adopted. In addition, City Staff has determined that the
ordinance as proposed is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of
the California Environmental Quality Act because it would permit temporary signs for limited
periods of time in existing commercial and service districts and therefore does not have the
potential to cause an impact on the environment.
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs for
First Reading and approve the Resolution establishing the fee for the processing Temporary Sign
permits. -
ATTACttMENTS:
,
6.
7.
8.
Temporary Sign Matrix - page 4
Temporary Sign Matrix for Historic Old Town - page 5
April 20, 1992, Staff Report for the proposed Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs -
page 6
July 6, 1992, Staff Report for the proposed Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs -
page 7
Planning Commission Resolution No. 92- - page 8
Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs - page 11
Ordinance No. 348, Article XIX (Advertising Regulations) - page 22
Resolution Establishing a Fee for Processing a Temporary Sign Permit - page 23
SXSI(]NC'OM]vi~IGN.AR 3
ATTACItMENT NO. 1
TEMPORARY SIGN ORDINANCE MATRIX
~" S~SlONCOMM~TEMPSIGN.AR 4
ATTAINT NO. 2
TEMPORARY SIGN ORDINANCE MATRIX - OLD TOWN AREA
ATTACHM~NT NO. 4
JULY 6, 1992 STAFF REPORT
S~SIGNCOi,~Vi~I(~,,I.AR 7
RECOIVIlV~NDATION:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
C1TYOFTEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 20, 1992
Case No.: Temporary Sign Ordinance
k-pared By: David Ho~zn
At s OpT Resolution No. 9'2-
ordinance entitled:
recommending adoption of an
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE crrY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TtflvlBCULA AMENDING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE
NO. 348 PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF
TEMPORARY SIGNS.*
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
City of Temecula
PROPOSAL:
An Ordinance establishing standards to allow Temporary Signs.
LOCATION: Citywide
BACKGROUND
Beginning in early August, 1991, City Staff conducted enforcement activities against illegal signs
in commercial areas of the City. The enforcement campaign resulted in letten of violation being
sent to a large number of business owners who had en'ected banners, sandwich boards, and other
illegal temporary signs. Under Section 19.2 of Ordinanc~ 348, these tytgs of signs are not
allowed. Because of the large number of businesses affected by the enforcement action, the City
Council received a number of complaints from local business owners about the City's decision
to enforce the Sign Ordinance.
To respond to the concerns raised by the business community, the City Manager invited
members of the business community to discuss the issues of temporary signage on September
30, 1991. At that meeting, a number of business repeated the concerns raised before the City
Council. As a result of this meeting, the City Manager agreed to establish a Temporary Sign
Committee, composed of business people and members of the City's Planning and Building
Departments, to develop appropriate standards for temporary signs. The represcntatives of the
business community included realton, property managers, business ownen, a sign manufacturer,
and a representative of the Chamber of Commerce.
SWrAFFRF~TBMI~IGN.PC 1
DISCUSSION
The Te. mpordry Sign Committee met three times, on December 5, 1991, January 24, 1992, and
April 8, 1992, to formulate appropriate standards for temporary signs. Throughout the process,
the Committee worked to arrive at a consensus of what were the most reasonable approaches and
standards to regulate temporary signage.
The December 5th meeting was instrumenffi in form-h. ng the direction and approach to
temporary signs. The Committee members that were present discussed a wide range of issues
and concerns. The Committee's consensus provided the direction for subsequent meetings and
the draft ordinance. The following is a summary of the issues, concerns, ideas, and
opportunities that r~.pxcscnt the cons~sus of the Committee.
1. The differences between business identification and adverti~g.
3. That all businesses must be equally U'eated.
4. That temporary signs obstruct the visibility of other business and signs.
That temporary signage is not an intended to compensate for a cheap, low visibility
location, or for poor marketing or business decisions.
That too much signage gives the impression the image of a "low quality" community, and
creates visual blight and clutter.
7. That special standards are needed for oM town.
The permitting process for temporary signs should be an easy, reasonable, and ideally,
an over-the-counter approval.
o
That enforcement could be made easier through the use of a stick-on temporary pcrmit
with an easy-to-read expintion daz.
10.
That the City could provide signs for new businesses, such as "GRAND OPENING" or
"THE CITY OF TEMECUI~ WELCOMES "
11. That color or style prderences should only be guidelines.
12.
That seasonal disphys (eg. Chtismms, Thnni~Ejving, etc.) should not be regulated if they
do not contain any advertising, sale or business information.
13.
That the standards need to provide specific req~ents and to be flexible enough to
allow reasonable extensions.
Following this discussion, the Committee began to identify which type of temporary signs were
appropriate and inappropriate. As a result of this disatssion, the Committee arrived at a
consensus which provided the foundation for the item discussed at the January 24th Committee
meeting. The following Table contains a summary of the Committee consensus from December
5th meeting.
TYPES OF TF2dl~RARY SIGNS
A~-~OWED?
No
Banners-
Interim (until a permanent sign
is available) Yes
open g Yes
Promotional Yes
Pennants, Company Flags, and
Balloons
On a limited basis for a
limited time
With special events, for a
limited time
Field Mounted-
Onsite
Off site
Not discu~
No
Vehicle Mounted
No
Window-
Painted Yes
Paper, cardboard Yes
~lectric Yes
Up to 10 and 25 % of the
window area
Based upon the Temporary Sign Committee' s preliminary consensus, and with the guidance and
direction from the Temporary Sign Committee, City Staff developed draft temporary sign
standards for the January 24, 1992, meeting. Listed below are the lists of appropriate and
inappropriate temporary signs.
Appropriate Temtn-ary Signs are:
1. Interim signs: for new businesses until a permanent sign is available;
2. Promotional signs: for special sales events and promotions;
3. Grand opening signs: to announce a business grand opening; and,
4. Special event sip: for temporary, seasonal, or community events.
Inappropriate Temporary Signs are:
1. A-Frames and other portable signs;
2. Off-site signs; and,
3. Vehicle mounted signs.
S~STAFFRF~'rBMPSlON.!'C 3
At the January 24th meeting, the Committee reviewed and discussed the dzaft standards and
arrived at a consensus that represented general agreement among the Committee members
present. It was stated at both the January 24th and April 8th meetings, that the regulation of
legal For Sale, Lease or For Rent (real estate) Signs were regulated by Section 19.5 of
Ordinance 348, and therefore are not intended to be pan of this Ordinance.
The Committec's consensus included inca'casing the number of allowable promotional and grand
opening signs for business~ with frontage on two or more arterial streets up to 2 signs,
simplifying the size requirements for promotional and grand opening signs, and a number of
other minor co,,,,ctions and adjustments. At the end of the meeting of January 24, 1992, the
Committee requested that City Staff revise the matrix based upon the consensus of the
Committee, draft written descriptions of the Committee's con..~-nsus, and t~nsuliTe the definitions
for Temporary Signs. With this direction, City Staff revised the matrix and prepaxed written
definitions and standards for the Temporary Sign Committee.
The Tempox'ary Sign Committee met on April 8th and ~ the written descriptions and
definitions prepared by City Staff. The written descriptions and definitions are shown in
Attachment 3. At the meeting, the Committee arrived at a consensus that the revised standards
and definitions were acceptable and repre...v..nted reasonable tem~ sign regulations. The one
area of disagreement concerned the requirement that promotional, grand opening, and interirn
signs must be attached to the building where the business activity or use occurs. The
requirement for temporary signs to be atnched, resulted in a *split consensus" within the
Commitme. The Cornrvittee members in favor of the requirement felt that pwhibiting detached
temporary signs would limit the opportunities for blocIcing the view of other businesses and their
signs, reduce the visual clutter, simplify the permitting process, and make temporary (as well
as permanent signage) more effective. The Committee members which were opposed to the
requirement stated that they felt that detached temporary signs would be more effective and
could be located closer to the street.
h is Staffs opinion that detached temporary signs could increase visual clutter along the
streetscapes in commercial areas of the City. In addition requiring signs to be attached to the
buildings should simplify and streamline the permit approval process by enabling staff to conduct
mostly over-the-counter appwvah and by allowing most business ownen to receive permits with
only a single visit to City Hall. In conWast, the permitting process .for the detached temporary
signs would require precise plotting of temporary sign locations, create additional work for
applicants, and result in need for additional inspections and permit processing.
A minimal foelow cost) fee is proposed for temporary sign permits to improve the ease of
obtaining a temporary sign permit. The concept for proposing a minimal fee for Temporary
Sign Permits is based upon the assumption that Promotional, Grand Opening, and Interim Signs
will always be attached to the building.
CONCLUSION
The proposed Temporary Sign Ordinance that is attached to this Stuff Report represents the
consensus of the members of the Temporary Sign Committee who attended the meetings.
Because the proposed Ordinance represents a consensus, not all the Committee members were
in complete agreement with every provision. However, when taken as a whole, the members
of the members of the Committee, ezcept as noted above, were ~ti-~fied with the provisions and
requir~raents contained in the draft Orttin~nce.
The process of developing has been time consuming and lengthy. It would have been faster for
the City Manager to request that staff prepa~ the OrOlnnnce without outside input. Instead a
committee composed of business people and City Staff was created to work together to develop
these standards. This collaboration between acl~e,,.vn~tives of the public and private sectors has
The proposed amendment to the Sign Ordinance will provide uniform standards to regulate
temporary signs within the City. These uniform standards win:
Enhance the image of Temec, ln as a high-quality community;
Prevent visual blight and clutter and promot~ toutism; and,
The proposed Temporary Sign Ordinance will ~ the City with the standards to allow
appropriate types of temporary signs, allow for a simplified and streamlined permitting, and
establish for a minimal fee for Temporary Signs Permits. The Ordinance as proposed, includes
the requirement that promotional, grand opening, and interim temporary sign be attached to the
building. The proposed Ordinance will not apply to For Sale, Lease or For Rent Signs allowed
pursuant to .by Section 19.5.
The Temporary Sign Ordinance mends the City's current Sign Ordinance and would serve as
interim regulations until the City's Zoning Development Code is prepared and adopted, at which
time this Ordinance could be incorporated and/or modified inw the final Zoning Development
Code.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This Ordinance will allow for the use of temporary signs for limited periods in existing
commercial areas. The proposed Ordinance does not have the potential to cause a significant
affect on the environment. Therefore, Staff has determined that the project is exempt from
CEQA under Section 15061 Co) (3).
FINDINGS
That the proposed Temlxn'ary Sign Ordinance will enhance the image of Temecula as a
high quality community.
That the Temporary Sign Ordinance, as proposed, will not result in visual blight and
clutter.
That the proposed Te,upoxary Sign Orclinsnce will race and maintain property values
in co_m__mercial areas of the City.
There i~ reasonable probability that the propoKd Temporary Sign Ordinance will be
consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable
time and in accordance with the goals and/or poficies of the City's future General Plan.
There is not a likely IRobabili~ of submntial de-ime~t to, or interference with the
futm'e General Plan, if the plopfled policie$ ~e ,,!li~mtely incon-~i-_qent with the plan,
due to the fact that policies will be adop~ for the new Czeneral Plan. Therefore, it is
likely ttm__t the City will consider these policies during their ~on of the Genenl
Plan.
FUTURE GENERAL PLAN CONSIs'r~NCY
Staff finds it probable tlmt the proposed Temporary Sign Or61nmnce will be consistent with the
General Plan when it is adopted since the Commvnity Design roemeet will address community
design and aesthetic issues, including architt, t*B,re, lm~Jlt~n_~ alld signage.
STAFF RECO~ATION: Th~ p!nnning De~tvtl~lt Staff recomm~ds that the
Planning Commi-w~ion:
,~r~PT Resolution No. P.C. 92-
adoption of an ontin,,~ee entitled:
recommending
"AN' ORDINANCE OF Tn'g CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMEaJIA AMENDING PORTIONS OF
ORDINANCE NO. 348 PERTAINING TO THE
REGULATION OF TEMl~RARY SIGNS.*
vgw
Attachments:
Resolution - blue page 7
Ordinance - blue page 10
Ordinance No. 348, Article XIX (Advertising Regulations) - blue page - 18
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION
S~TA.PFRP'~TBMPSKR~,PC 7
ATrACtIMENT NO. 1
RESOL~ON NO. P.C. 92-
AN ORDINANCE OF TRY- C1TY COUNCIL OF l'Fff- CITY
OF T~V!ECULA AMENDING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE
NO. 348 PERTAINING TO ~ REGULATION OF
TEMPORARY SIGNS.
w H ,,:R~&S, City Ordlnnnce No. 90-04 adopted by rdemnce cernin portions of the non-
codi~ed Rivehide County Ordinances, includi~ OrdinnnCe No. 348 ("Land Use Code'); and
WHS*~I~-,~ffi, SUCh re~datiCmS do not contsin adequam provisions for the use of
temporary signs; and
WI~REAS, the City of Temec,,~a desires to regulate the use of temporary signs and to
protea the health, quality of life, and the environment of the residents of Temecula; and
Wn~R!~.AS, notice of the proposed Ordin-nce was posted at City Ha!l, County Library,
Rancho C~lifomia Branch, the U.5. Post Of S:e and the Temecula Valley Chamber of
Commerce;
WHRRI?.A.S, pubtic hearing was conducted on April 20, 1992, at which time interested
persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; and
NOW, Tm~I~.I~ORE, ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF Tm~. CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETER.MINE AND ORDER AS FOTJ,0WS:
Section 1, That the Planning Comml-e, sion of the City of Temecuh hereby finds th~t the
proposed Temporary Sign Ordinance will provide fo~ the establishment of regulations for
temporary signs in a fair and eqnimble manner..
Seaion 2, That the p!annlnZ Commission of the City of Temecula further fin& that the
proposed Temporary Sign Ordinance will pwbably be consistent with the General Plan when it
is adopted.
Section 3, That the planning Commigsion of the City of Temecula hereby finds that thi.~
Ordinance does not have the potential to cause a significant affect on the environment.
Therefore, Staff has determined that the project is exempt from CAlifornia Environmental Quality
Act, as amended, punuant W Section 15061 (b) (3).
S~'TAFI:I~'~r2dI~I(}N.PC 8
Section 4. That the Planning Commi.~sion of the City of Temecuh hereby recommends
to the City Council that the Council adopts the proposed Temporary Sign Ordinance. The
Ordinance is incorporated inW this Resolution by this x~ference and marked Attachment '2~ for
identification.
PASSED APPROVED AND ADOPTED thi.~ 20th day of April, 1992.
JOHN E. HOAGLAND
CHAIRMAN
I HKRk:sy CERTIFY that the fOlt~Oing Resol~n was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City Of Temec~,!= at a v~aisr meeln~ ~, held on the 20th day of April,
1992 by the following vote of the Commission:
COI~{MISSIONIERS:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
COIvfiVII-~SIONERS:
9
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
ORDINANCE NO.
10
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
ORDINANCE NO. 92-
AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF TFtF,
C1TY OF TEMECULA AMENDING PORTIONS OF
ORDINANCE NO. 348 PERTAINING TO THE
REGULATION OF TEMPORARY SIGNS
The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby ordain as fonows:
S__,~._'__nn 1. Findings. The City CotincH for the City of Temecuh hereby makes the
following findingS:
A. The City Coundl is authorized by Section 65850C0) of State plnnning and Zoning
Law, to adopt ordinances teg-ln,eg signs and billboards.
B. That the~ is a need m improve the cotupaitlveness of service and commercial
businesses and mnlntnln the ne~he~c quality commercial areas in the City.
C. That the regulation of temporary signs is an effective method w improve the
competitivehess of these besine,~?~s in the City.
D. The Planning Commi~glon fin& that the City is proceeding in a timely fashion
with the px~mration of the general plan and that:
1. There is a reasonable probability that the action proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
2. There is little or no pwbability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future adopted general plan if the proposed action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
3. The proposed action complies with all the applicable requirements of State
hw and local ordinnnces.
4. The City Council finds that the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with
the prepantion of the general pinn and thnt:
a. There is a reasonable probability that the action proposed will be
consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied
within a reasonable time.
s~r,,,,=n.,,n'x'm~szo~.z,c 11
b. There is liUle or no probability of substantial deuiment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan ff the proposed action is ultinmely inconsistent
with the plan.
c. The proposed action complies with all the applicable requirements
of State law and local ordinanCeS.
Section
read as fonows:
Section 19.2 of Aniclc XIX of Ordlnsncc No. 348 is hereby mended to
*t. *Temporary Sign* means a sign which is made of cloth, bunting,
plastic, vinyl, painted windows, or other ~ materlnl.% is located on the site of the business
use or activity, and is erected or placed fpr a short period of time to promote, advertise,
nnnounce, or provides the following infornlation:
(1) Desig,~tes, identifies, or indi~ the name of the business,
owner, or occupant Of the premises where the sign is local~; or,
(2) Advertises tlme business condu~, the services available or
rendered, or goods produced, sold, or av~nnhle for sale upon the premises winere the sign is
locate.
u. 'Promotional Sign' means a tr,,upo, ary sign intended to atwact
attention to a use or activity for a limited mamber of events as identified in this ordinance.
Promotional signs must he attached to the building where the use or activity is located.
v. 'Interim Sign' means a temporary sign intended to provide interim
signage while the permanent signage is being fabricated, repaired, or pretnred for insutlhtion.
An interim sign may contain only the business name and logo. Interim signs must be located
in close pwximity to the business use or activity and must be allached to the building where the
use or activity is located.
w. *Special Event Sign" means a temporary sign for special community
activities or seasonal events, including but not limited to: charitable and conl!llunlty fund raising
events, Christmas tree sales, the tractor races, or the wine and balloon festival. Special event
Signs must be located in ClOse prOlrimity to the event.
x. *Grand Opening Sign * means a temporary sign, bearing the words
'Grand Opening*, or some slmilnr message to ',announce the opening of a new business. Grand
opening signs must be attached to the btlildillg Or strtlctllre where the use or activi~ is located.
y. *Temperdry Sign Event' means any number of consecutive days
of disphy of a promotional sign, not to exceed fifteen (15) days.
z. 'Porutble Sign' means a sign not 6esiffn~ to be allached to a
building or permanent strucnuc. Examples of pomble signs include, but are not limited W: A-
Frames, also known as sandwich boards, and T-Frames, also known as spring-loaded signs.
swr, u~u,n?mm. sx~r.x.c 12
aa. *Vehicle Mounted Sign* means any temporary sign attached or
mounted on any vehicle or trailer, whether or not the tires and wheels arc still attached."
Section 3.
as follows:
Section 19.9 is ~ to Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 and sbal/read
wSection 19.9. TRVn~R,ARY SIGNS. No person shall erect or place an
tcmporazy sign that is in violalkm of the provisions of this ordlnsncc. For the purpose of the
Ordinance, temporary signs do not include For Sale, Lease or For Rent Signs, which are
regnlated by Section 19.5, and seasonal window displays than conlain traditional holiday
characters and messages, are intende~ to crea~ or ~nhsnCe holiday character of an area, and do
not reference or display the service avsilahle or lgnin~, or goods pzoduccd, sold or available
for sale.
A. Permit Requi~. A Temporary Sign Permit shall be required prior to the placing
or erecting of any Promotional, Special Bvent, Grand Opening, or Inn Sign. All temporaxy
signs shall comply with the pwvisions of this Ordinance and all other applicable hws and
ordinances. An application for a permit shall be made on the forms and in the manner specified
by the planning ~ and shall be accompanied by the requixed fees or zetnoval bonds. After
receipt of a complete application for a tanpo, ary sign permit, the planning Director, or his
designee shall render a decision W appwve, approve with modifications, or deny any request for
a Temporary Sign Permit within I0 working days.
B. Prohibitions. All Temporary Signs not expressly pemiued by this OrdinanCe are
prohibited. The list of prohibited Tempotat? Signs include~, but B not limited to, the following:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Portable signs.
Vehicle mounted signs.
Promotional signs, except as permitted by thi.~ Section.
Interim signs, except as permitted by this Section.
Special event signs, except as permitted by thi.~ Section.
Grand opening signs, except as permitted by this Section.
Flashing or rotating signs.
Temporary roof signs.
Temporary signs on public piolx, tty.
C. Promotionnl Sites. Promotional Signs are permitted in the C-1, C-P, C-P-S,
C-T, and M-SC zones and shall comply with the following requiretnents:
1. For each use or business activity; one (1) pwmotional sign may be
allowed. For a use or business activity with frontage on two or more arterial streets, up to two
(2) pwmotional signs may be allowed.
2. The maximum height of the top of any promotional sign shall not exceed
the top of the eave line or parapet wall of the building where the use or activity is located.
sks'r,,m:n~Tn~n, st~.~c 13
The dimensions of any promotional sign shall not exceed any the following
The surface area sbnn not exceed fifty (50) square feet.
The height (vertical dimension) shall not exceed three (3) feet.
~ ~ Cllorizo!llal dimension) shall not exceed sixty percent
4. The mn~msms dutatiol for a promotional sign, for any business use or
activity, shall not exceed any of the following standards:
a. Four (4) Temporary Sign Events per calendar year;,
b. Thirty (30) conseasfive days; or,
c. Sixty (~0) days per c~i,-,b- year.
$j;~eci=l ~tv~.nt Si~-~. Special Event Signs shall cxmxply
with the fortowing
D®
1. For each use or business activity; one (1) special event sign may be
allowed. For a use or imsiness aclivity with frolnge on two or more ~ street, up to two
(2) special event signs my be allowed. Excqx ltmt for special community activities, such as
the Tractor Races or tile Wine and Balloon Festival, the Director may allow up to four (4)
special event signs ff appropriate.
eight (8) feet.
requirements:
The maximum height to the top of any special event sign shall not exceed
The dimensions of any special event sign shall not exceed the following
The surface area of any sign shall not exceed thirty (30) square feet.
Tne height (vertical elimen,ion) shall not exceed three (3) feet.
The width (horizontsl dime-nsion) shall not exceed twellty (20) feet.
Special event sip my be permitted for any period up to forty-five (45)
consecutive days.
5. The plnnning Director may attach any approval conditions deemed
necessary to ensure the compatibility with the surrounding area and to protect the public health,
s~rAFnu, nnm, sso~.~: 14
E. Grand Opeplng Signs. Grand Opening Signs az permitted'in the C-l, C-P,
C-P-S, C-T, and M-SC zones and sbnll comply with the following requirements:
1. For each use or business activity; one (1) grand opening sign may be
allowed. l~or a usc or busincss activity with frontage on two or more arterial sUccu, up to two
(:2) grand openinS signs my be allowed.
2. The maximum height of the top of any grand opening sign shah not exceed
the top of the eave line or parapet wall of the building where the use or activity is located.
requirements:
(30) square feet.
3. The dimensions of any grand opening sign shah not exceed the foBowing
a. The surface area for a grand opening sign shall not exceed thirty
b. The height (vertical dimension) shall not exceed three (3) feet.
c. The width (horizontal dimension) shall not exceed fifty percent
(50%) of the business or store frontage, whichcve~ is smaller.
4. Grand opening signs my he permitted for any period up w thirty-five (35)
days, during the first 90 days of businr,= operation.
F. Interim Signs. Interim signs are intended to provide short-term emergency
signage for permanent businesses and shnll comply with the following requirements:
1. Interim signs shall meet the following requixcxnents:
a. Should he located in the same general location as the permanent
signage.
b. Shall not he used concurrently with the permanent signage.
c. Shall not be used concurrently with promotional signs.
2. The nmximum number of interim signs for any business use or activity
shall not exceed the number of permanent signs allowed by Section 19.4 of this Ozdinance.
3. The maximum height of the top of any interim sign shall not exceed the
top of the eave line or parapet wall of the building where the use or activity is located.
4. The dimensions of any interim sign shall not exceed the foBowing
re~:luirements:
a. The surface area for a sign shall not exceed thirty (30) square feet.
s~^~.,~vnmma,.x,c 15
b. The height (vertical dimension) shall not exceed three (3) feet.
c. The width (horizontal dimension) shall not exceed fifty percent
(50%) of the business or store frontage, whichever is smaller.
5. Inn signs may be allowed for any period up to forty-five (45) days.
With good cause, the Director of Planning my allow one time extension, for any period up to
(30) days.'
Section 4. Paragraph A of Section 2 of Ordinance.671.4 is hereby mended to read as
follows:
"(37)
Te~~ Sign Permit
a. General Fund
i. Planning Department
46119'
Section 5. Sevex~bility
The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for
any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shsll hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of
this ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the vatidity of the remaining parts of
this ordinance.
Section 6. C'~-OA Conlpliance
The City Council finds that the x%nfiation of temporary signs in existing commercial, industrial,
and retail zones has no possibility of having a significant impact on the environment. As a
result, the adoption of these regulations is exempt from environmental review pursuant to the
provisions of Section 15061Co)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines prepared punuant to Section
21083 of the California Environmental Q,,.lity Act, as amended.
Section 7. l::.ffective T~ate
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk
shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted
in three designated posting places.
swrax, m, nTmx, s~.~ 16
PASSED, APPROVED~ AND ADO~, this day __ day of ,1992.
PATRICIA H. BIRDSALL
MAYOR
Jun~ S. Greek, Ci~ Clerk
[SFAL]
s~.~u,n'rmm~.z.c 17
ATTA~ NO. 3
ORDINANCE NO. 348, ARTIC~ .1~. XIX
(ADVERTISING REGULATIONS)
swraz,pswr~Tmsam~.Pc 18
ATTACHM~NT NO. 4
JULY 6, 1992 STAFF REPORT
SXSX~COkO, IXTmd~.~.R 7
Case No.:
RECOMMENDATION:
STAFF BgPORT - PIANNING
CITYOF~
PLANNING COMMISSION
July 6, 1992
Ordinance Rtgulatin_o Temporary Signs
~ By: David Hogan
.aBOPT RsoM~ No. 92- recommending adoption of an
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE C1TY COUNCIL OF TI~ CITY
OF TI~IEC'jLA ~ING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE
NO. 348 PI~TAINING TO ~ REGULATION OF
TBMPORARY SIGNS."
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Ci~ of Temccula
PROPOSAL:
An Ordinnnc'~ Establishing Standards for Temporary Signs.
LOCATION: Citywide
BACKGROUND
Beginning in early August, 1991, City Staff conducted enforcement activities against illegal
temporary signs in commercial areas of the City. The enforcement campaign resulted in letters
of viohfion being sent to a lax~e number of business owners who had ereaed banners, sandwich
hoards, and other illegal temporary signs. Because of the large number of complaints about the
City's decision W enforce the Sign Ordinance, the City established a committee of business
people and City Staff to develop appropriate standards for temporary signs. The Tcmporary
Sign Committee's initial standards for temporary signs was presented to the Planning
Commission on April 20, 1992. The April 20th Surf Report is contained in Attachment 1.
At the April 20th meeting, the Planning Commission received public testimony on the proposed
Ordinance Regnhting Temporary Signs. The issues raised during public testimony are as
follows:
That the proposed ordinance should balance the needs of community as a whole
with the needs of the small business community during these hard economic
times;
swrAFnrnTmomo~.2Pc ]
The City should continue it's moratorium on enforcement of the current sign
ordinance;
That there is a need to clean-up temporary signs in the City;
· The importance of maintaining atW~ive and orderly commercial areas;
· That there is a need for special tf,,hlX,,dy SiVa standards in Old Town; and,
· That there is a need to allow temlxnry signs in special hardship situations.
Based upon this public testimony, the Planning Commis~on requested that City Staff meet with
the other members of the Temporary Sign Committee. and discu~ the foliowing items:
1. The hardship provision to allow temponry signs during public project construction;
2. The feasibility of and possible standards for deXachcd temporary signs; and,
3. Any special standards for temporary signs in Old Town,
DISCUSSION
The Temporary Sign Committee met on June 3, 1992, and discussed these three topics. The
first item discussed by the Committee related to hardship situation signs. The Committee agreed
that these signs are needed when major Imblk consmicfion disrupts normal public aa:ess to ---,
shopping center or single business. The proposed ordinance allows the Director of Planning th,
discretion to determine the appropriate size, number and location of the permitted signs. The
Committee also agreed that hardship situation signs are not a cure for poor shopping center
access or parking area design. Staff concurs with the Committee's consensus and has included
this pwvision in the proposed ordinance.
The second item discussed by the Temporary Sign Committee was the feasibility, desirability,
and possible standards for detached temporary signs. As a result of this discussion, the
Committee arrived at a consensus that detached temporary signs:
Are often more effective than allached temporary signs on commercial streets
with higher speed limits;
Need to be aesthetically pleasing; and,
Should not to impsir or block the visibility of other businesses and their signs, or
obstruct the view of moWfists.
However, after discussing the matter at some length, thc Committee was unablc to reach an
agreement on the standards for detached temporary signs. The discussion of the standards for
detached temporary siEns centered on the following issues:
The need for free-standing manuf'scun~! frames that do not require additional
bracing or guy wires;
The need for a minimum separation distance between detached temporary signs;
and,
The sw~11er size requirements for de-~cbed temporary signs because they may be
located closer to the wad.
Staff has not included detached temporary signs in the proposed ordinance because of the lack
of clear Committee agreement on the what the mndards should be, the complexity of the
permitting and enforcement processes, and the potential liability problems that could occur with
detached temporary signs. Therefore, City Staff recommends that standards for detached
temporary signs not be included in the proposed ordinance.
Thc third item discussed by the Temporary Sign Cox, mittee was the need for special temporary
sign standards in the area of historic Old Town Temecula. After a great deal of discussion, the
Committee agreed that they wercn't really qualified to discuss the standards for Old Town; and
that the Old Town Merchants Association and the Old Town Local Architectural Review Board
should be consulted. With this recommendation from the Temporary Sign Committee, City Staff
met with a working group composed of the Old Town Merchants Association and the Old Town
Local Review Board on June 12, 1992. Present at the mcetln_~ were most of the Board of
Dircctors for the Old Town Mcrchants Association, several merchants from the old town area,
and a member of the Old Town Local Review Board. As a result of this meeting, the working
group arrived at a consensus that temporary signs in Old Town should:
· Bc pcdcstrian oricntcd rather than automobile oriented; and,
Use non-glossy fabric-like materials rather than fluorescent or iridescent
materlab.
The working group felt that the following requirements should be included in the temporary sign
standards for historic Old Town Temecula:
· Use non-glossy fabric-like materials;
· Use lettering styles appropriate to the period between 1890 to 1920;
· Use appropriate muted colon and earth tones; and,
· Be no larger than 12 square feet.
Staff concurs with the working group's agreement on temporary signs in Old Town. Their
consensus is included the proposed ordinance. Therefore, Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission include these provisions in the proposed Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs.
To dam, the City pi~nnlrlg depattmellt has received three letters commenting on the issue of
temporary signs and the proposed Ordinance. The fn'st letter is from the Temecula Valley
ChatJibe/of Commerce ~lting that it supports the pipposed ordillance. The second letter wa~--
sent to City lVlana~r David Dixon by Mr. Donald M. Clark, an area resident and operator o,
three Wendy's restaurants in Los Angeles. He stated that he did not believe that temporary
signs are the solution to the business problems in Temecula. The third letter is from James
Futcher, owner of the Subway Sandwich Shop and member of the Temporary Sign Committee,
.rating his support of the proposed ordinsmce. Copies of the~ letters are contained in
Attachment 2.
Throughout the process of developing regulatiom for temporary signs, a number of other sign
issues have been repeatedly raised. The representatives of local real estate finns have discussed
their need to advertise that free maps snd communitywide information is available, and several
restaurant owners have mentioned their need to adverdse their daily specini-~ and menus. These
types of permanent supplemental signs will be included in the new City Sign Ordinance that will
be prepared after adoption of the City's new General Plan and Development Code.
CONCLUSION
The proposed Ordinance Re~lating Temporary Signs ~epresents the consensus of the members ·
of the Temlxn'ary Sign Committee, the OM Town Meshants Associate and the Old Town Local
Review Board who artended the various meetings. The revised Ordinance represents a consensus
of these groups. As a result, not all of the individuals involved a~ree with every provision, but
taken as a whole, the members of the Committee, were ~nerally satisfied with the provisions
and requirements contained in the draft Ordinance. The proposed Ordln~nce rep~ ~
collaboration between representatives of the public and private seaors has resulted in regulation.,,
.that are both reasonable and implementable.
The Temlxn'ary Sign Committee was unable to reach a consensus on the standards for detached
temporary sig~s. As a result, Staff continues W recommend that detached temporary signs not
be permitted with these regnlafions. The proposed amendment to the Sign Oxdinance will
provide uniform standards to regnlate temporary signs within the City. These uniform standards
will:
1. Provide for effective business identification;
2. Prevent visual blight and clutter and promote tourism;
Enhance the hnage of Temecuh as a high quality community; and,
4. Address the special needs of historic Old Town Temecuh.
The proposed Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs would add Seaions 19.9 and 19.10, to
Article XIX of Ordinance 348, and provide standards that would:
· Allow for some types of appropriate temporary signs;
S'~"!'Alrlrl~CiN.2l"C 4
· Provide for a simplified and strenmllneti permit process; and,
· Authorize a minlmnl fee for Temporary Signs Permits.
The Ordinnnce as proposed, does not apply to For Sale, Lease or For Rent Signs which
reguhted by the provisions of Section 19.5, Temporary Political Signs, which are regnhted by
the pwvisions of Section 19.?, and menu boards and maps available signs which are reguhted
by the pwvisions of Section 19.4. City Staff an~citntes thai these various types of permanent
supplemental signs will be addressed in the new City Sign ~ce that will be prepared after
adoption of the City's new General Plan and Development Code.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This Ordinance will allow for the use of temporary signs for limited periods in existing
commercial and service di.~riCt$. AS a result, the proposed Ordinance Regulating Temporary
Signs does not have the potential to cause significant impac~-~ on the environment. Therefore,
Staff has determined that this project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061 (13) (3).
FINDINGS
The proposed Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs will provide for effective
identification.
The proposed ~ce Regulating Temporary Signs will enhance the image of
Temecuh as a high quality community.
The proposed Ordinance Regnhting Temporary Signs will not result in visual blight and
clutter.
There is reasonable pwbability that the proposed Ordinnnce Regnhting Temporary Signs
will be consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan.
There is no reasonable probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with the
future Old Town Specific Plan if the proposed Ordinance Regnhting Temporary Signs
is ultimately inconsistent with the policies contained in said Plan.
There is reasonable probability that the pwposed Ordinance Regnhting Temporary Signs
will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a
reasonable timc and in accordance with the goals and/or policies of the City's future
General Plan.
There is no reasonable pwbability of substantial detriment to, or interference with the
future General Plan if the proposed Ordinance Regnhting Temporary Signs is ultimately
inconsistent with the goals and policies contained in said Plan. It is also likely that the
City will consider these policies during the preparation of the City General Plan.
S~rAI~D.P~'r~dBION.2PC ~
~ GEN't3U~ R.,LN CONSIS~C~
Staff finds it probable that the proposed Ordin,nee Regulatjng Temponry Signs will ~
consistent with the General Plan when it is adopted since the Community Design Element w.-.
address community design and aesthetic issues, including architecture, landing and signage.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The phnning Department Staff recommends that the
plnnnin[ Commi-~ion:
ADOPT Resolution No. P.C. 92-
adoption of an ordinnnce entitled:
recommending
*AN ORDINANCE OF THE CrfY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ~ AMENDING PORTIONS OF
ORDINANCE NO. 348 PERTAINING TO THE
REGI~ATION OF TEMPORARY SIGNS?
vgw
Attachments:
April 20, 1992, Staff Report for the proposed Ordinance Regulathg Temporary Signs -
blue page 7
Letters Supporting the proposed Ordinance Reg-lnfing Tunpo, dry Signs - blue page 8
Resolution - blue page 9
Ordinance - blue page 12
Ordinance No. 348, Article XIX (Advertising Regulations) - blue page - 23
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
APRIL 20, 1992 STAFF REPORT
RECO~ATION:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
aTYOFTBIvlI~LA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 20, 1992
Cage No.: Te)lporiry ~i~) OrdlngnCe
~ By: David Hogan
,~nOPT Resolution No. 92- recommending adoption of an
*AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMILr'ULA AMENDING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE
NO. 348 PERT~G TO IHE REGULATION OF
~RARY SIGNS.*
'APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Ci~ of Temecula
PROPOSAL:
All OfdinnnCe establi.~hing stalldards tO nliOW Temporary Signs.
LOCATION: Citywide
BACKGROUND
Beginning in early August, 1991, City Staff conducted enforcement activities against illegal signs
in commercial areas of the City. The enforcement campaign resulted in letters of violntion being
sent to a large number of business owners who had erected bannen, sandwich boards, and other
itlegal temporary signs. Under Section 19.2 of Oftiinnnce 348, these types of signs are not
allowed. Because of the large number of businesses affected by the enforcement action, the City
Council received a number of complaints from local business owners about the City's decision
to enforce the Sign Ordinance.
To respond W the concerns raised by the business community, the City 1Vlatlager invited
members of the business community tO discuss the issues of temporary signage on September
30, 1991. At that meeting, a number of business repeated the concerns raised before the City
Council. As a result of thi.~ meeting, the City Manager agreed to establish a Temporary Sign
Committee, composed of business people and members of the City's Planning and Building
Depamnents, to develop appropriate standards for temporar~ signs. The representatives of the
business community included reaJtofs, property managers, business owners, a sign manufacturer,
and a representative of the Chamber of Commerce.
DISCUSSION
The Temporary Sign Committee met three times, on December 5, 1991, January 24, 1992, ana
April 8, 1992, to formulate al~ropriate standards for temporary signs. Throughout the process,
the Committee worked to arrive at a consensus of what were the most reasonable approaches and
standards to regulate temporary signage.
The December 5th meeting was instn, ment=l in formuiJfing the direction and appwach W
temporary signs. The Committee members that were present discussed a wide range of issues
and concerns. The Commi,tee's consensus provided the direction for subsequent meetings and
the draft ordinance. The following is a summary of the issues, concerns, ideas, and
1. The differences between business identification and advertising.
3. That an businesses must be equally uuted.
4. That temporary signs obstruct the visibility of other business and signs.
5. That temporary signage is not an intended to compensate for a cheap, low visibility
location, or for poor marketing or business decisions.
6. That too much signage gives the impression the image of a *low quality* community, and
creates visual blight and clutter.
7. That special standards are needed for old town.
8. The permitting process for temporary signs should be an easy, reasonable, and ideally,
an over-the-counter appwval.
9. That enforcement could be made easier through the use of a stick-on temporary permit
with an easy-to-read expiration date.
10. That the City could provide signs for new businesses, such as *GRAND OPENING* or
'THE CITY OF TEMBCULA WE.~OM~
11. That color or style preferences should only be guidelines.
12. That seasonal displays (eg. Christmas, Thanksgiving, etc. ) should not be regnlated if they
do not contain any advertising, sale or business information.
13. That the standards need to provide specific requirements and to be flexible enough to
S~'TAPFRF~TIMPSION.PC 2
· Following this discussion, the Committee begall tO identify which type of tcmpom~ signs were
appropriate and inappropriate. As a result of this discussion, the Committee alTived at a
consensus which pwvided the foundation for the item discussed at the January 24th Committee
meeting. The following Table contains a stlmmnry of the Committee consensus from December
5th meeting.
TYPES OF ~RARY SIGNS
A-Frames
ALLOWED?
No
Banners-
Interim (until a permanent sign
is available) Yes
Opening Yes
Promotional Yes
Pennants, Company Flags, and
Balloons
Field Mounted-
On,site
Offsite
Yes
Not rli~lssed
No
Vehicle Mounted No
Window-
Painted Yes
Paper, cardboard Yes
Electric Yes
On a limited basis for a
iimir/Ki time
With special events, for a
limited time
Up to 10 and 25% of the
window area
Based upon the Temporary Sign Comrnittee's preliminary consensus, and with the guidance and
direction from the Temporary Sign Committee, City Staff developed draft temporary sign
standards for the January 24, 1992, meeting. Listed below are the lists of appropriate and
Appropriate Temporary Signs are:
1. Interim signs: for new businesses until a permanent sign is available;
2. Promotional signs: for special sales events and promotions;
3. Grand opening signs: to announce a business grand opening; and,
4. Special event signs: for temporary, seasonal, or COmmlBlity events.
Inappropriate Temporary Signs arc:
1. A-Frames and other portable signs;
2. Off-site signs; and,
3. Vehicle mounted signs.
S~TAPPRJt~TRMPSI~-P~ 3
At the January 24th meeting, the Committee l~,viewed al~ tti.~.usse~ the dralet standards and
arrived at a conse-n~Is that l~IP,,seDted ionera] agreem~ a!llollg the Committt.~. members
present. It was stated at both the January 24th and April 8th meetings, that the regulation
legal For Sale, Lease or For Rent (real estate) Signs were regulated by Section 19.5 o.
Ordinance 348, and therefore are not intended to be pan of this Ordinance.
The Committee's consensus included increasing the number of allowable promotional and grand
opening signs for b~,~inesse, s with fro!ltage on two or more arterial streets up to 2 signs,
simpli/ying the size requirements for promotional and grand Opening signs, and a number of
other minor corrections and adjustments. At the end of the meeting of January 24, 1992, the
Committee requested that City Staff revise the ~ ~ lipon the consensus of the
Committee, draft written descriptions of the Committee's consensus, and ~nalize the definitions
for Temporary Signs. With this direction, City Staff revised the matrix and prepared written
definitions and standards for the Temporary Sign Committee.
The Tempox'ary Sign Committee met on April 8th and discu~ the written descriptions and
definitions prepared by City Staff. The written descriptions and definitions are shown in
Attachment 3. At the meeting, the Committee arrived at a consensus that the revised standards
and definitions were acceptable and represented reasonable temlxnm'y sign reguhtions. The one
area of disagreement concerned the requirement that promotional, grand opening, and interim
signs must be attached to the building where the business activity or use occurs. The
requirement for temporary signs to be attached, resulted in a *split consensus* within the
Committee. The Comm~,,.- members in favor of the requixgment felt that prohibiting detached
temporary signs would limit the opportunities for blocking the view of other businesses and their
signs, reduce the visual cintter, simplify the permitting process, and make temporary (as wells,
as permanent signage) more effective. The Commitlee members which were opposed to thk
requirement stated that they felt that detached temporary signs would be more effective and
could be located closer to the street.
It is Staffs opinion that detached temporary signs could increase visual clutter along the
streetscapes in commercial areas of the City. In addition requiring signs to be auached to the
buildings should simplify and streamline the permit approval process by enabling staff to conduct
mostly over-the-counter approvals and by allowing most business owners to receive permits with
only a single visit to City Hall. In contrast, the permitting process for the detached temporary
signs would require precise plotting of temporary sign locations, create additional work for
applicants, and result in need for additional inspections and permit processing.'
A minimal (below cost) fee is proposed for temporary sign permits to improve the ease of
obtaining a temporary sign permit. The concept for proposing a minirn,'al fee for Temporary
Sign Permits is based upon the assumption that Promotional, Grand Opening, and Interim Signs
will always be ached to the building.
S'~'TAFFRPF~TRMPSIG~.PC 4
CONCLUSION
The proposed Temporary Sign Ordinance that is attached W this Staff Report represents the
consensus of the members of the Tempozary Sign Committee who aucnded the meetings.
Because the proposed Ordinance represents a consensus, not all the COmmittee memberi were
in complete agreement with every pwvision. However, when taken as a whole, the members
Of the metnben of the Committee, except as noted above, were satisfied with the pwvisions and
rg~qllLreDlent$ CO!~in~l in the d11ft DrdirmnCe.
The process of developing has been time consuming and lengthy. It wouM have been faster for
the City Manager to zequest that staff prepare the Ontin~nc~ without outside input. Instead a
COmmittee composed Of bilsiness people lind City Staff was created to work Wgether to develop
these sumdarda. This collaboration between zepresenr. tive. s of the public and privsxe seaon has
The proposed amendment W the Sign Ol'61n~nC~e Will provide uniform standards to regulate
temporary signs within the City. These uniform standards will:
Bnhance the image of Temecuh as a high-quality community;
Prevent visual blight and clutter and promote tourism; and,
PnhnnCe the pwvctty values in commercial and service distflas.
The proposed Temporary Sign Ordlmunoe wffi provide the City with the standards to allow
appropriate types of tempontry signs, allow for a simplified and stfenmline/J permitting, and
establish for a minimnl fee for Temporary Signs Permits. The Ordinance as proposed, includes
the requirement that pwmotional, grand opening, and interim temporary sign be attached to the
building. The pipposed DfdlnnnCe will not apply to For Sale, Lease or For Rent Signs allowed
pursuant to by Section 19.5.
The Temporary Sign Ordinance mends the City's current Sign Ordinance and would serve as
interim regulations until the City' s Zoning Development Code is prepared and adopted, at which
time this Ordinance could be incozporated and/or modified into the final Zoning Development
Code.
ENVIRO~AL DETERMINATION
This Ordinance will allow for the use of temporary signs for limited periods in existing
commercial areas. The proposed Ordinance does not have the potentinl to cause a significant
affect ot~' the enviroment. Therefore, Staff has determined that the pwject is exempt from
CEQA under Section 15061 (b) (3).
FINDINGS
That the proposed Temporary Sign Ordinance will enhance the image of Temecuh as a
high quality community.
That the Temporary Sign Odinance, as proposed, will not result in visual blight and
clutter.
That the proposed Temlxxary Sigu Ordinance will euhance and maintain property value,
in commercial areas of the City.
is probability that the pmpo Te.n , -y Sign Ordinance win be
consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable
time and in accordance with the goals and/or policies of the City's future General Plan.
There is not a likely probability of mbstanfial dariment to, or interference with the
future General Plan, if the proposed policies are ultimately inconsistent with the plan,
due to the fact that policies will be adopted for the new General Plan. Therefore, it is
likely that the City will cousider these policies during their preparatiou of the Geueral
Plau.
FUTURE GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
Staff fmds it probable that the propos~ Temporary Sign Ov~in-nce wffi be consistent with the
General Plan when it is adopted since the Community Design Blement will address community
design and aesthetic issues, inehding arehltecU~re, !,rodseeping and signage.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Depamnent Staff recommends that the
p!nnnlng Commi~4on:
.&nOPT Resohnicm No. P.C. 92- recommendin~
adoption of an ordin. nce entitled:
"AN ORDINANCE OF T~v- CITY COUNCIL OF ~
CITY OF ~ AMENDING PORTIONS OF
ORDINANCE NO. 348 PERTAINING TO ~
REGULATION OF TEMPORARY SIGNS?
vgw
1. Resolution - blue page 7
2. Ordinance - blue page 10
3. Ordinance No. 348, Article XIX (Advertising Regulations) - blue page - 18
S~TA-uPRP~TRMPSI(3~,PC 6
ATTA~ NO. 2
Lb:~-~'~ OF SUPPORT
,L)LA
40945 County Center Dr., Suite C
Temecula, CA 92591
(714) 676-5090
April 15, 1992
Mr. John Meyer
City of Temecula
Planning Department
P.O. Box 3000
Temecula, Ca. 92590
Dear Mr. Meyer,
The Civic & Developmental Committee of the Temecula Valley
Chamber of Commerce has reviewed your Temporary Sign Ordinance
proposal. With no objections or exceptions, the proposal was
accepted as proposed.
Thank you for involving the Chamber in this process and if we can
be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call on us
once again.
Sincerely,
Leigh Engdahl
Executive Director
Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce
CC:
Cathy Zaitz, Chairman
Civic & Developmental Committee
Donald M. Clarke
23065 Donnoch Court
Murrieta, CA. 92562-307~
LETTER TO THE EDITOR,
THE CiTY COUNCIL OF TEMECUL.A,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF MURRIETA
THE CALIFORNIAN
27450 YNE:Z ROAD SUITE 300
TEMECULA, CA. 92590
APRIL 17, 1992
I read with interest the plight of Greg Treadwell owner of Granny's
Bakery and really the plight of all small business in the Valley, with
regard to Banners, signs and business in general.
Earlier this year I received a $11 O. ticket for parking my car on the
street in front of my office with (Z) 8xl 0 inch "for sale" signs in the
window. The car was parked legally, for about 4 hours on a Saturday on
Enterprise Circle North. I had obviously violated some clearly defined
statute of the City of Temecula. I thought about going to court (in Lake"
Eisinore of all places) to protest the ticket, after all I had not just left
the car somewhere, I was in my office. I decided the effort would
probably be a waste of time and made my contribution to the City's
coffers.
Every day ! drive by Mr. Treadwe!!'s yellow Panel Truck with the
smashed up front end and the 4x6 foot hand lettered sign, a vehicle which
has obviously not moved in months. Although I presume it is parked
legally, it is just a matter of time before someone runs into the sign and
the truck as this part of Jefferson is very congested with traffic entering
and exiting the various retail centers. I presume that if the sign on my
car had said "Donut Sale" instead of 'For Sale", I would not have received
a ticket.
i operate three Wendy's restaurants in the City of Los Angeles so I
feel qualified to comment on the banner issue. I am often asked 'when I
am going to open a Wendy's in the Valley?' My answer is not an~ime
soon. Why? Mr. Treadweirs problem is not a visibility problem, there are
just too many places to eat in Temecula and for that matter too many
video stores, dry cleaners, furniture stores, smog shops, you name it
What Mr. Treadwell and all current small business owners in the Valley ~'
truly need is a moratorium on new business licenses, unless a clearly
defined need for the new business can be demonstrated.
Donald M. Clarke
23055 Donnoch Court
Murrieta, CA. 92562-3075
I know business licenses are a revenue generator, but every business
that fails, does not renew their license. I would bet the revenue curve
from licenses is now flat or declining.
I am nnt = nn grnwth =rtvn~-=t~, sensible growth is the key to the
prosperity of the Valley and the Small Business operators who have risked
their dollars to be here. They deserve a chance to survive. It is no secret
that retail commercial space in .the Valley is overbuilt. Every new
redundant restaurant, video store, and photo shop that opens is not only
likely to fail, but threatens the viability of every existing restaurant,
video store, and photo shop. You can believe in the economic theory of
survival of the fittest, or at least the deepest pocket, but as a practical
matter, all of our businesses are suffering. Healthy competition benefits
everyone, over saturation hurts everyone. I hope Mr. Treadwell makes it,
but frankly not every small business will. The best way to help the
entrepreneurs of the Valley is to make new businesses pass the test that
their service is needed. Simple criteria based on population in a 1 mile
radius can be devised and as growth of population resumes, business
growth can as well.
In many cases we will be doing the inexperienced new entrepreneur a
favor. How many business men and women have risked their life savings
and mortgaged their homes and futures to open a business for which there
was no sustainable level of demand for their product or service? How
many viable businesses in 1988, are unviable today in 1992, because
competition' has eliminated their profit margin? We must have a viable
business base to grow the Valley's economy. We must create the
environment to allow businesses to mature and prosper. Every liquidation
sale and deeply discounted meal is only a short term benefit for the
Consumer. Every small business owner that goes under sets off a chain
reaction of bad loans, unpaid bills and taxes, and too often a home
foreclosure which undermines the value of adjoining homes as the lender
liquidates the property.
Lastly, lets get the banners off the streets, the balloons off the
roofs and the biimps out of the air and restore the dignity of our beautiful
Valley. Reasonable guidelines for temporary signs can be adopted to
serve the requirements of all businesses. Whatever provisions the council
decides to enact, must be evenly enforced and no one will be unfairly
disadvantaged. Banners beget more banners, balloons more balloons.
RECEIVED. J. UN 3 8 1992-
Subway Sandwiches
27625 Jefferson Ave.
Temecula,Ca. 92590
Mr. John Meyer
planning Department
City of Temecula
Dear Mr. Meyer:
As a member of the Temporary Sign Ordinance
ComiCtee I regret that I will be unable to attend the July
6, 1992 Planning Commission meeting.
I am the owner of the Subway Sandwich shops at
the Target Center, and the Adobe Plaza.With this letter I
wish to go on record as being in total support of the Temporary
Sign Ordinance submitted at this meeting.
If Temecula is to become the city that we are all
proud of,we must enact a fair and effective temporary sign
ordinance.This will prevent the types of signs presently on
Jefferson Ave which reflect very poorly on all of us as a ~
citY.
The City Government must recognize that the
underlying cause of the restaurant problem within Temecula
is not with more signage, but the fact that there is a fixed
amount of spendable income allocated to eating out.There are
presently more food establishments within Temecula than the
population can support. Yet, they keep coming.Yet, the city
keeps encouraging this type of growth.
It is my contention that the city has engaged in
unfair business practices by 2ranting waivers of the existing
ordinance to my competition , as well as anyone else that
wants to clutter the city with questionable signals. At
previous meetings we have all heard of business being increased
by 50% to 75% with the addition of a simple A Frame. I could
no longer contain my greed for a 50/75~ increase so I
purchased an A Frame against my better Judgment.
As I suspected we realized less than a 5% increase.
One can only guess where the increase came from, but it is
a safe bet. that it came from one of my competitors that
probably do not have illegal signage.
In all my business classes that deal with
successful business I have heard of such things as:
Location
Fill a Need
Provide Quality ~
Service
Cleanliness
Promotion
More Location
making a
But, I have never seen an A Frame or Banner included as an
essential need to achieve success, yet tonight I'm sure that
you will hear that the Temecula business community will not
survive unless you reject the Teml~orary Sign Ordinance
prepared by Staff in conjunction with a citizens committee.
As a business owner in Temecula, I encourage the Planning
Commission to accept the Ordinance as proposed.
Sincerely:
S F;"'~~
W. Further
Owner Subway 1799, 4778
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
]~v-';OLUTION
ATrACHlVrPNT NO. 3
RF.~OLUTION NO. P.C.
AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ C1TY
OF TRvIF_,CUI~ ~ING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE
NO. 348 PERTAINING TO ~ REGULATION OF
TEMPORARY SIGNS.
WItImRAS, City Ordinance No. 90-04 adopted by re~erence certain portions of the non-
codi~ed Riverside County Ordinances, including Ordinance No. 348 ("Land Use Code"); and
W!:IERR~LS, such reg-intions do not contain adequate provisions for the use of
temporary signs; and
WBRRRJ. S, the City of Temecuh desires to reguhte the use of temporary signs and to
pwtect the health, quality of life, and the environment of the residents of Temecuh; and
WIrERRAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, County Library,
Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecuh Valley Chamber of
Commerce;
WlI!~RRAS, public hearings were conducted on April 20, and July 6, 1992, at which
time interested persons had an opportunity W testify either in support or opposition; and
NOW, THRREPORE, TB'E PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF
TEVIECULA DOES I~EqOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOTJOWS:
Section 1. That the Planning Commission of the City of Temecuh hereby finds that the
proposed Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs will provide for the establishment of
reguhtions for temporary signs in a fair and equitable manner.
Section 2. That the Planning Commission of the City of Temecuh further finds that the
proposed Ordinance Reguhting Temporary Signs will pwbably be consistent with the Old Town
Specific Plan when it is adopted.
Section 3. That the Planning Commi-~sion of the City of Temecuh further finds that the
proposed Ordinance Reguhting Temporary Signs will pwbably be consistent with the General
Plan when it is adopted.
Section 4. That the Planning Commission of the City of Temecuh further finds that the
proposed Ordinance Reguhting Temporary Signs does not have the potential to cause a
significant impacts on the environment and has determined that the pwject is exempt from
California Enviromental Quality Act, as mended, punat to Seaion 15061 Co) (3).
SWra~'nTB~,S~ON.2~ 10
Section 5. That the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby recommends
to the City Council that the Council adopts the proposed Ordin~nC~ Regulatillg Temporary Signs.
The Ordinance is incoxporat~d into this Resolution by this r~ference and marked Attachment
for identification.
PASSED APPROVED AND ADO~ this 6th day of July, 1992.
JOHN E. HOAGLAND
CHAIRMAN
I HEg KS~y CffallV'lr that the foregoing Rzsolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Cornmi.~ion of the City of Temec~ds at a re~ndsr meeting thereof, held on the 6th day of July,
1992 by the following vot~ of the Commi-~ion:
COMMISSIOn:
NOK~:
COMMISSIONfiRS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
ORDINANCE NO. 92__
s~.arr~mosm.~c 12
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
ORDINANCE NO. 9~-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING PORTIONS OF
ORDINANCE NO. 348 PERTAINING TO THE
REGULATION OF TEMPO~Y SIGNS
The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1. Findings. The City Council for the City of Temecula hereby makes the
following findings:
A. The City Council is authorized by Sectkn 65850(0) of State p]nnning and Zoning
Law, to adopt ordinances regulating sip and binboards.
B. That there is a need to improve the competitiveness of service and commercial
businesses and maintain the aesthetic quality of all areas in the City.
C. That there is a need to provide specific and. historically appropriate tempoxary
signage in the Old Town area.
D. That regulating temlxnm'y signage is an effective method to improve the aesthetic
quatity of all areas in the City.
E. That the overuse of temponiz~ signs results in visual clutter, the deterioration of
the City's commercial and service districts, and the inefficient use of business advertising
reSOUrceS.
F. The City Coundl fmds that the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general phn and that:
1. There is a reasonable probability that the action proposed will be consisrgnt
with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied Within a
reasonable time.
2. There is little or no pwbabfiity of substantial detriment to or inteffcrence
with the future adopted gcneral plan if thc proposed action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
3. There is llrde or no pwbabillty of subsumtial deuiment to or interference
with the future Old Town Specific Plan if the pwposed action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
4. The proposed action complieS with all the applicable requirements of State
swr^mummmm~.~: 13
law and local ordinances.
Section 2.
read as follows:
Section 19.2 of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 is hereby amended
*t. 'Temporary Sign' means a sign which is made of cloth, bunting,
plastic, vinyl, poger board, painted windows, or other similar vsnt~ri~i.% and which is located
on site of the business use or activity, and is aeaed or placed for a prescribed period of time
to pwmote, advertise, announce, or provide the following information:
(1) Desi~nates, identifies, or indicales the name of the business,
owner, or occupant of the premi-~..s where the sign is located; or,
(2) Advertises the business conducted, the services available or
rendered, or goods produced, sold, or avniinhle for sale upon the premises where the sign is
located.
u. 'Promotional Sign' means a temporary sign intended to atwact
attention to a use or activity for a limited number of events as identified in this ordinance.
v. *Window Sign ' means any wrilXen ~tzfion, emblem or other
character, or sign which is painted, alxached, glued, or otherwise affixed to a window or is
easily visible from the exterior of the building where the advertised product or service is
available.
w. *Interim Sign' means a temporary siffn intended to provide interin.
signage while the permanent signage is being fabricated, repaired, or prepared for in.e~n~tion.
x. *Special Event Sign ' means a temporary sign for special community
activities or seasonal events. By way of example only, such activities or events may inchde
charitable and communi~ fund raising events, Chrisunas tree sales, the tractor races, or the
annual Temecuh wine and balloon festival.
y. 'Grand Opening Sign' means a temporary sign, bearing the words
'Grand Opening', or some similnr message W announce the opening of a new business.
z. "Temporary Sign Event' means any number of consecutive days,
up to fifteen (15), for the disphy of any promotional sign.
r'
aa. *Portable Sign" means a sign not designed to be auached to a
building or permanent grucmre, vehicle or trailer. Examples of penable signs include, but are
not limited W: A-Frames, also known as sandwich boards, and T-Frames, also known as spring-
loaded signs.
bb. 'Vehicle Mounted Sign' means any temporary sign attached or
mounted on any vehicle or trailer, whether or not the tires and wheels are still auached, and
whether or not any such vehicle has an engine or other internal combustion machine containe~''
s~,,.pn~?uama~.~c 14
within it.
cc. "Historic Old Town Tcmccula" means the area within the City of
Temecuh that is bounded by: Mcgeedes Suect on the east, 1st Street on the south, the channel
of Murrieta Creek on the west, and the intersection of Moreno Road and Mercedes Street on the
Section 3.
as follows:
Section 19.9 is added to Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 and shall read
*Section 19.9. T~A~]ItARY SIGNS. No person shall erect, place, or install any
temporary sign that is in violation of the pwvisions of this Ordinance. For the purpose of this
Ordinance, temlxnm'y signs do not include For Sale, Lease or For Rent Signs (which are
regulaxcd by Scction 19.5), Tctnyo,,uy Political Signs (which arc regulated by Section 19.7),
or seasonal window displays than contain traditional holiday chazacters and messages and which
axe intended to create or enhance holiday character of an area and do not reference or display
service available or rendered, or goods pwduced, sold or available for sale.
A. Permit Reqtiired. A Temporary Sign Pemit shall be required prior to the phcing,
erecting, or installing of any promotional, special event, grand opening, or interim sign. All
such temporary signs shall comply with the provisions of this OrdinanCe and all other applicable
laws alKI or(iln=nce,~. An application for a permit shall be made on the forms and in the manner
specified by the Director of Ylanning and stud] be accompanied by the required fees or removal
bond set by resolution of the City Council. Thereafter, the following procedure shall govern
the application for, and issuance of, all temporary sign permits under this ordinance:
1. Within ten (10) working days of receipt of a completed application for a
temporary sign permit, the Director of planning shall either:.
a. Issue the temporary sign permit, ff the sign(s) that is the subjea of
the application conforms in every respect with the requirements of this ordinance; or
b. Reject the sign permit ff the sign(s) that is subject of the application
fails in any way to conform with the requirements of this ordinance. In the case of a rejection,
the Director of Planning shall specify in the rejection the seaion or seaions of the ordinance
with which the sign(s) is inconsistent.
2. In addition to the temporary sign standards listed in this seaion, the
Director of Planning may attach any appwval conditions deemed necessary to ensure the
compatibility with the surrounding area and to protea public health, safety,or welfare.
B. Prohibitions. All Tmporary Signs not expressly permitted by this Ordinance are
pwhibited, including but not limited to the following:
Portable signs, including, but not limited to animal.%
A-Frames, T-Frames, and those of a similar nature.
Vehicle mounted signs.
buman beings,
.s~r~,mu,n~m~esn~.nc 15
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Pennants and stre_-~mers.
Promotional sips, except as pertained by this Seaion.
Inn signs, except as permiued by thi.~ Seaion.
Special event signs, excelX as In'miued by this Section.
Window signs occupying more than ten percent (10%) of the non-door
window area, except as permilxed by this Section.
Temporary roof sip.
Tennpom'y siffns on public pA¥caty or in the public fight-of-way, except
as pertained under S~ion 19.9.B of t~i.~ Ordinance.
Temporary si~ns in ~ Old Town Temecula, except as permitted
under Section 19.10 of h Ol~innnee,.
C. Pl~om~ov.! ,~i/ns. Promotional siffns are penn~ed in the C-l, C-P, C-P-S,
C-T, and M-SC zones and shall comply with the al~mlhla~e requirements listed below:
1. l~or each use or business activi~; only one (1) pwmotional sign may be
allowed. Excep~ that for a use or business a~vity with fronage on two or more arterial su'eets,
up to two (2) promotional signs may be allowed. Window signs occupying more than ten
percent (10%), and not grea~r ttan twenty five pcav~t (25 ~) of the non-door window area
shall be considered equivalent to one (1) promotional sign for purposes of this Section.
2. All promotional signs shall be .t~-ci~,~t to ~ building where the use ~
activity is located and shall comply with the following requirements:
a. The ma~imllBl height of the top of any pwmotional sign shall not
exceed the top of the eave line or parapet wall of the building where the use or activity is
located.
fonowing requirements:
The dimensions of any promotional sign shall not exceed any fine
(1) The surface area shall not exceed fif~ (50) square feet.
(2)
The height (vertical dimension) shall not exceed three (3)
(3) The width (horizontal dimension) shall not exceed sixty
percent (60 ~) of the business or swre frontage, whichever is smaller.
3. Promotional siffns that are located on window surfaces shall not exceed
twenty five percent (25 %) of the non-door window area, except that no permit shall be required
for promotional window signs that cover ten pcrcait (10%) or less of the non-door window
surface area.
4. The maximum duration for promotional signs, shall not exceed any of the
fOllOwing prescribed time periods:
consecutive days); or,
Up to two (2) consecutive Temporary Sign Events, (ie. thirty (30)
b. A total of four (4) Temtxrary Sign Events per calendar year.
D. Gr~nd Ql~n½~. Interim sntl ~t;)ecint l~v,~nt Signs. Grand Opening, interim, and
special event signs are permitted in the C-l, C-P, C-P-S, C-T, and M-SC zones and shall
comply with the appropriate requirements listed below:
1. For each use or business activity; up to one (1) sign may be allowed.
Except for a use or business activity with frontage on two or more arterial streets, then up to
two (2) signs may be allowed.
2. Grand opening signs may be permitted once in the first ninety (90) days
of business operation.
3. Inn signs are for inn and emergency purposes and shall contain
only the business name and logo.
4. Special event signs for special events shall be located close to the activity
or event being advertised.
5. Signs for communitywide events and activities, such as the Tractor Races
or the Temecula Wine and Balloon Festival, are allowed only on the site of the proposed event
and are issued only to the orl~niT'~tlon or individuals orL, n~niT-ing or promoting the event.
6. All Grand opening, interim and special event signs shall be attached to the
· building where the use or activity is located and shall comply with the following requirements:
a. The maximum height of the top of any sign shall not exceed the top
of the cave line or parapet wall of the building where the use or activity is located.
The dimensions of any sign shall not exceed any the fortowing
requirements:
(1) The surface area shall not exceed thirty (30) square feet.
(2)
The height (vertical dimension) shall not exceed three (3)
feet.
(3) The width Cnorizontal dimension) shall not exceed fifty
percent (50%) of the business or store frontage, whichever is mailer.
swr~mumvmmm~..=~c 17
c. Grand opening, interim and special event signs may be allowed for
· any period up to forty-five (45) days. The Director of Planning may allow one time extension,
for any period up to thirty (30) dayS, with good cause. It is the responsibility for the proponent,
of the enension to justify why the extension is at, pwp~iate.
E. I-l~rdsbip Provision. The Director of Planning may approve a Hardship Situation
Temporary Sign Permit in cases of exueme hardship and unusual circumstances relating to the
property where the business is located, including off-site construction activities that may disrupt
the public's access to the business. Hardship Situation Temporary Signs shall be granted only
when, because of special circumstances applicable to the plol, Gty, the strict application of the
Tenlporar~ Sign Ordinance deprive~ [he pfOpfaty Of priv~e~es enjoyed by other property in the
vicinity and under the idenlical zoning classification.
1. The proponmt Of a request for a bardship situation temporary sign sb-n
be responsible for clearly demonstrating that an ~e hardship and unusual circumstance
exists, and that the extreme hardship and unusual circumsumces warrants the approval of a
hardship situation temporary sign, and that strict implementation of the Temporary Sign
Ordinance deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under
the identical zoning classification.
2. The Director of planning my issue a Temporary Sign Permit for a
hardship situation for any period up to six (6) months. Det~mina~on of the number, size, and
location of temporary signs for hardship situations shall be at the discretion of the Director of
Planning.
3. Any haxdship tem~ sign permit issued shall be conditioned to ensm,
that said permit does not constitute a grant Of special privilege inconsim~-*nt with the limitations
upon other propc, ties in the vicinity and in the same zone, to ensure enmpaU'b'dity with the
surrounding area and to protect the pubtic health, safety or welfare. *
Section 4.
as follows:
Section 19.10 is added to Article XIX Of Ordinance No. 348 and shall read
"Section 19.10. T!~{PORARY SIGNS INI-ftSTORIC OI-r}TOWNT!~!~~.
No person shall erect, place or install any temporary sign in Historic Old Town Tomecub in
violation Of the provisions of this Oldinance. For the purpose Of this Ordinalice, ternpolity
signs do 'not include For Sale, Lease or For Rent Signs (which are regulated by Section 19.5),
Temporary Political Signs (which are regulated by Section 19.7), or seasonal window disphys
than contain Waditional holiday characters and messages and which are intended to create or
cnhance holiday character Of an area and do not reference or disphy service available or
rendered, or goods produced, sold or available for sale.
A. Permit ReqBired. A Temporary Sign Permit shall be requirexl prior to the phcing,
erecting, or installing Of any promotional, special event, grand opening, or interim sign. All
such temporary signs shall comply with the provisions Of this ordinance and all other applicable
hws and ordinances. An application for a penttit shah be made on the forms and in the manner
specified by the Director Of Planning and shall be accompanied by the required fees or removr"'
s~'ra~z~nramm~m.~ 18
bond set by resolution of the City Council. Thereafar, the following procedure shall govern
the, al~.licaflon for, and issuance of, all teznporary sign permits under this ordinance:
1. Within ten (10) working days of receipt of a completed application for a
temporary sign permit, the Director of plnnning Shsll either:
a. Issue the temporary sign permit, if the sign(s) that is the subject of
the application conforms in evea'y respect with the requirements of this ordinance; or
b. Reject the sign permit ff the sign(s) that is subject of the application
fails in any way to conform with the requirements of this ordinance. In the case of a rejection,
the Director of pinnning shall specify in the rejection the section or seaions of the ordinance
with which the sign(s) is incon.~i.~ent.
B. Old Town I o~1 Review annrd. The Director of Planning is hereby authorized
to consult with the Old Town Local Review Board to prepare any supplemental requirements
regulating the size, shape, materials, color, or character of temporary signs in Historic Old
Town Temecula that the'Director deems neces_~ry to maintain the character of Old Town.
C. Probibitiong. All Temporary signs not expressly permiRed by fixis Ordinance are
pwhibited, including but not limited to the following:
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
10.
11.
12.
Portable signs, including, but not limited to nnimni.% human beings,
A-Frames, T-Frames, and those of a s'nnilar nature.
Vehicle mounted signs.
Promotional signs, except as permitted by this Section.
Interim signs, except as permitted by this Section.
Special event signs, except as permitted by this Section.
Grand opening signs, except as permitted by this Section.
Window signs occupying more than ten percent (10~) of the non-door
window area or six (6) square feet, whichever is greater.
Flashing or totaling temlxll'iry sig~B.
Off-site temporary signs.
Temporary roof signs.
Temponn'y signs on public property or in the public right-of-way.
D. Promorionnl ,~ifns in Historic Old Town Temecula. Promotional signs in Historic
Old Town Temecuh are permitted in the C-1, C-P, C-P-S, and M-SC zones and shall comply
with the requirements listed below:
may be allowed.
For each use or business activity; up to one (1) attached promotional sign
2. Promotional signs in Historic Old Town Temecula shall be allached to the
building where the use or business activity is located and shall comply with the fonowing
requirements:
s~ram~ynvnasm~.~pc 19
a. The maximum height of the top of any temporary sign shall not
exceed the top of the cave line or parapel wall of the building where the use or activity is
located. No promotional sign shall be erected or placed so as to interfere with normal pedestria~
and vehicular traffic.
b. The surface area ~hnll not exceed twelve (12) square feet.
c. Promotional signs shall be made of n-glossy material with a
fabric or cloth-like appearance and shall use dun, non-primary, non-~uorescent, and non-
iridescent colors.
3. The maximum duration for any promotional sign, for any business use or
activity, shall not exceed any of the fonowing standards:
consecutive days); or,
Up to two (2) conse~ive Temtx~ary Sign Events, (ie. thirty (30)
b. A toUd of four (4) Temporazy Sign Bvents per calendar year.
l~. C, rand Openhll,. Interim and ,m~;e~ial nvPnt -~i~rng in Rim)tic Old Town Temeculn.
Grand opening, inn, and special event signs in Historic Old Town Temecuh arc permitted
in the C-1, C-P, C-P-S, and M-SC zones and shall comply with the requirements listed below:
1. l=or each use or business activity; up to one (1) grand opening or interim
sign may be atlowed. ~
2. Grand opening signs are permitted once in the first ninety (90) days of
business operation.
3. Interim signs are for interim and emergency purposes and shall contain
only the business name and logo.
4. Special event signs for spechl events shall be located close to the activity
or event being advertised.
5. Signs for communitywide events and activities, such as the Tractor Races
or the Temecuh Wine and Balloon Festival, are allowed only on the site of the proposed event
and arc issued only to the orgsnir~tion or individuals orbnixing or pwmoting the event.
r'
6. Grand opening, interim and special event signs in Ristoric Old Town
Temecuh shall be allached to the building where the use or activity is located and shall comply
with the following requireanents:
a. The maximum height of the top of any sign shall not exceed the top
of the cave line or parapet wall of the building where the use or activity is located.
b. The dimensions of any firand opening, interim or special event signs
shall not exceed a surface area of twelve (12) square feet.
c. Shall be made of non-glossy material with a fabric or cloth-like
appearance and .~hnn use dull, non-primary, non-~uorescent, and non-iridescent colon.
d. Grand opening, interim and special event Signs may be allowed for
any period up to forty-five (45) days. The Director of Planning may allow one time extension,
· for any period up to thirty (30) days, with good cause. It is the responsibility of the pwponent
of the extension to justify why the extension is appropriate.
F. I4nra~hip Provision. The Dire~r of Planning may approve a Hardship Situation
Temporary Sign Pronit in Historic OM Town Temecatla in ctse~ of extreme hardship and
unusual circumstances P,,hting to the property where the business is located, including off-site
construction activities that may disrupt the public's access to the business. Hardship Situation
Temporary Signs shall be granted only when, because of special circumstances applicable w the
property, the strict application of the Temporary Sign Ofdinnnce deprives the property of
privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under the identical zoning classification.
1. The ~t of a request for a hardship situation temporary sign shall
be responsible for clearly demonstrating that an extreme hardship and unusual circumstance
exists, and that the extreme hardship and unusual circumstances warrants the approval of a
hardship situation temporary sign, and that mia implementation of the Temporary Sign
Ordinance deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under
the identical zoning classification.
2. The Director d Planning may issue a Temporary Sign laennit for a
hardship situation for any period up to six (6) months. Deterrotation of the number, size, and
location of temporary signs for hardship situations shall be at the discretion of the Director of
3. Any hardship temporary sign permit issued shall be conditioned to ensure
that said permit does not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations
upon other properties in the vicinity and in the same zone, to ensure compatibility with the
surrounding area and the Old Town Specific Plan, and to pwtect the public health, safety or
weftare. '
Section 5. Vioh~ons
It shall be unlawful for any person to viohte any provision of thi,~ ordiJance. Any person
violating any provision of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of an infraction or mi.~!emeanor
as hereinafier specified. Such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and
every day or portion thereof during which any viohfion of any of the pwvisions of this
ordinance is committed, continued, or permiRed.
s~r~,*r~Tnu~.z~ 21
Any person so convicted shall be, (1) guilty of an infraction offense and punished by a fine not
exceeding One Hundred Dons,s ($100.00) for a lust violation; and (2) guilty of an infraction
offense and punished by a fine not exceeding Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) for a seconcL--
infraction. A third and any additional violation shall constitute a misdemeanor offense and shaL
be punishable by a fine not to exceed One Thousand Dollnrs ($1,000.00) or six (6) months in
jail, or both. Notwithstanding the above, a first offense may be charged and prosecuted as a
misdemeanor. Payment of any penalty henfin shall not relieve a person from the responsibility
for correcting any viohtinn.
Section 6. Severability
The City Council ben~ declares that the provisions of thi~ Ortlinnnt~e axe severable and if for
any reason a can of competent jurisdiction shall bold any sentrace, paragraph, or seedon of
this ordillallce to be invalid, sllch docisioll ~ !lot affect the validity of the re~nnining pal'ts of
Section 7, C'P/IA Conlplinnce
The City Council fin& that the regulation of temporary signs in existing commercial, industrial,
and re~il zones has no possibility of hnving a siglliti~al~ impacI on the environment. As a
result, the adoption of these re~mintlons is exempt from enviz~meml ~ pursuant to the
provisions of Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines prepared pursuant to Section
21083 of the California Environmental Quality Act, as mended.
Section 8. Rffective Date
Tinis Ordinane~ shall be in ~11 force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Cleric
shall certify to the adoption of this Ontinance and ~nuse ~ of this Ordln~-ce to be posted
in three designted posting places.
day of , 1992.
PATRICIA H. BIRDS.AT-v-
MAYOR
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
sxs'rAmm~n~es:~.nc 22
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
ORDINANCE NO. 348, ARTICt-~ XIX
(ADVERTISING REGUI~TIONS)
ATrACHlVlENT NO. ~
PLANNING COMMIRSION RESOLUTION
S~SIG'NCOI~ff~fiTP_,.IVlPSlGN .AR 8
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
RESOLUTION NO. P.C. 92-031
AN ORDINANCE OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING PORTIONS OF
ORDINANCE NO. 348 PERTAINING TO THE
REGULATION OF TEMPORARY SIGNS.
WHEREAS, City Ordinance No. 90-04 adopted by reference certain portions of the non-
codi~ed Riverside County Ordinances, including Ordinance No. 348 ("Land Use Code"); and
WHEREAS, such regulations do not contain adequate provisions for the use of
temporary signs; and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula desires to regulate the use of temporary signs and to
protect the health, quality of life, and the environment of the residents of Temecula; and
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hail, County Library,
Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of
Commerce;
WHEREAS, public hearings were conducted on April 20, and July 6, 1992, at which
time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby finds that the
proposed Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs will provide for the establishment of
regulations for temporary signs in a fair and equitable manner.
Section 2. That the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula further finds that the
proposed Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs will probably be consistent with the Old Town
Specific Plan when it is adopted.
Section 3. That the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula further finds that the
proposed Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs will probably be consistent with the General
Plan when it is adopted.
Section 4. That the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula further finds that the
proposed Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs does not have the potential to cause a
significant impacts on the environment and has determined that the project is exempt from
California Environmental Quality Act, as amended, pursuant to Section 15061 Co) (3).
$X$1GIqCOMMYTEMP$ION.AR 9
Section 5. That the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby recommends
to the City Council that the Council adopts the proposed Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs.
The Ordinance is incorporated into this Resolution by this reference and marked Attachment "2"
for identification.
PASSED APPROVF~D AND ADOPTED this 6th day of July, 1992.
JOHN E. HOAGLAND
CHAIRMAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 6th day of July,
1992 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
sxs~o~co~ m~sm.~ 10
ATTACH1M~NT NO. 6
ORDINANCE NO.
ATTACHM]ENT NO. 6
ORDINANCE NO. 92-
AN ORDINANCE OF TIIE CITY COUNCIL OF TttE
CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING PORTIONS OF
ORDINANCE NO. 348 PERTAINING TO TItE
REGULATION OF TEMPORARY SIGNS
The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1. Findings. The City Council for the City of Temecula hereby makes the
following findings:
A. The City Council is authorized by Section 65850Co) of State Planning and Zoning
Law, to adopt ordinances regulating signs and billboards.
B. That there is a need to improve the compefitiveness of service and commercial
businesses and maintain the aesthetic quality of all areas in the City.
C. That there is a need to provide specific and historically appropriate temporary
signage in the Old Town area.
D. That regulating temporary signage is an effective method to improve the aesthetic
quality of all areas in the City.
E. That the overuse of temporary signs results in visual clutter, the deterioration of
the City's commercial and service districts, and the inefficient use of business advertising
resources.
F. The City Council finds that the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan and that:
1. There is a reasonable probability that the action proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
2. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future adopted general plan if the proposed action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
3. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future Old Town Specific Plan if the proposed action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
SxSlGNCOMI~'rEMPSIGN.AR 12
4. The proposed action complies with all the applicable requirements of State
law and local ordinances.
Section 2.
read as follows:
Section 19.2 of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 is hereby amended to
"t. "Temporaxy Sign" means a sign which is made of cloth, bunting,
plastic, vinyl, poster board, painted windows, or other similar materials, and which is located
on site of the business use or activity, and is erected or placed for a prescribed period of time
to promote, advertise, announce, or provide the following information:
(1) Designates, identifies, or indicates the name of the business,
owner, or occupant of the premises where the sign is located; or,
(2) Advertises the business conducted, the services available or
rendered, or goods produced, sold, or available for sale upon the premises where the sign is
located.
u. "Promotional Sign" means a temporary sign intended to attract
attention to a use or activity for a limited number of events as identified in this ordinance.
v. "Window Sign" means any written representation, emblem or other
character, or sign which is painted, attached, glued, or otherwise affixed to a window or is
easily visible from the exterior of the building where the advertised product or service is
available.
w. "Interim Sign" means a temporary sign intended to provide interim
signage while the permanent signage is being fabricated, repaired, or prepared for installation.
x. "Special Event Sign" means a temporary sign for special community
activities or seasonal events. By way of example only, such activities or events may include
charitable and community fund raising events, Christmas tree sales, the tractor races, or the
annual Temecula wine and balloon festival.
y. "Grand Opening Sign" means a temporary sign, bearing the words
"Grand Opening", or some similar message to announce the opening of a new business.
z. "Temporary Sign Event" means any number of consecutive days,
up to fifteen (15), for the display of any promotional sign.
aa. "Portable Sign" means a sign not designed to be attached to a
building or permanent structure, vehicle or trailer. Examples of portable signs include, but are
not limited to: A-Frames, also known as sandwich boards, and T-Frames, also known as spring-
loaded signs.
s~sxo~co~m,~esxo~.^R 13
bb. "Vehicle Mounted Sign" means any temporary sign attached or
mounted on any vehicle or trailer, whether or not the tires and wheels are still attached, and
whether or not any such vehicle has an engine or other internal combustion machine contained
within it.
cc. "Historic Old Town Temecula" means the area within the City of
Temecula that is bounded by: Mereodes Street on the east, 1st Street on the south, the channel
of Murrieta Creek on the west, and the intersection of Moreno Road and Mercedes Street on the
north."
Section 3.
as follows:
Section 19.9 iS added to Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 and shall read
"Section 19.9. TEMPORARY SIGNS. No person shall erect, place, or install any
temporary sign that is in violation of the provisions of this Ordinance. For the purpose of this
Ordinance, temporary signs do not include For Sale, Lease or For Rent Signs (which are
regulated by Section 19.5), Temporary Political Signs (which are regulated by Section 19.7),
or seasonal window displays than contain traditional holiday characters and messages and which
are intended to create or enhance holiday character of an area and do not reference or display
service available or rendered, or goods produced, sold or available for sale.
A. Permit Required. A Temporary Sign Permit shall be required prior to the placing,
erecting, or installing of any promotional, special event, grand opening, or interim sign. All
such temporary signs shall comply with the provisions of this ordinance and all other applicable
laws and ordinances. An application for a permit shall be made on the forms and in the manner
specified by the Director of Planning and shall be accompanied by the required fees or removal
bond set by resolution of the City Council. Thereafter, the following procedure shall govern
the application for, and issuance of, all temporary sign permits under this ordinance:
1. Within ten (10) working days of receipt of a completed application for a
temporary sign permit, the Director of Planning shall either:
a. Issue the temporary sign permit, if the sign(s) that is the subject of
the application conforms in every respect with the requirements of this ordinance; or
b. Reject the sign permit if the sign(s) that is subject of the application
falls in any way to conform with the requirements of this ordinance. In the case of a rejection,
the Director of Planning shall specify in the rejection the section or sections of the ordinance
with which the sign(s) is inconsistent.
2. In addition to the temporary sign standards listed in this section, the
Director of Planning may attach any approval conditions deemed necessary to ensure the
compatibility with the surrounding area and to protect public health, safety, or welfare.
B. Prohibitions. All Temporary Signs not expressly permitted by this Ordinance are
prohibited, including but not limited to the following:
S\SIGNCOI~fi~f~iG'N.AR 14
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Portable signs, including, but not limited to animals, human beings,
A-Frames, T-Frames, and those of a similar nature.
Vehicle mounted signs.
Pennants and streamers.
Promotional signs, except as permitted by this Section.
Interim signs, except as permitted by this Section.
Special event signs, except as permitted by this Section.
Grand opening signs, except as permitted by this Section.
Window signs occupying more than ten percent (10%) of the non-door
window area, except as permitted by this Section.
Flashing or rotating temporary signs.
Off-site temporary signs.
Temporary roof signs.
Temporary signs on public property or in the public right-of-way, except
as permitted under Section 19.9.E of this Ordinance.
Temporary signs in Historic Old Town Temecula, except as permitted
under Section 19.10 of this Ordinance.
C. Promotional Signs. Promotional signs are permitted in the C-1, C-P, C-P-S,
C-T, and M-SC zones and shall comply with the appropriate requirements listed below:
1. For each use or business activity; only one (1) promotional sign may be
allowed. Except that for a use or business activity with frontage on two or more arterial streets,
up to two (2) promotional signs may be allowed. Window signs occupying more than ten
percent (10%), and not greater than twenty five percent (25%) of the non-door window area
shall be considered equivalent to one (1) promotional sign for purposes of this Section.
2. All promotional signs shall be attached to the building where the use or
activity is located and shall comply with the following requirements:
a. The maximum height of the top of any promotional sign shall not
exceed the top of the cave line or parapet wall of the building where the use or activity is
located.
b,
following requirements:
The dimensions of any promotional sign shall not exceed any the
(1) The surface area shall not exceed fifty (50) square feet.
(2)
The height (vertical dimension) shall not exceed three (3)
feet.
(3) The width (horizontal dimension) shall not exceed sixty
percent (60%) of the business or store frontage, whichever is smaller.
3. Promotional signs that are located on window surfaces shall not exceed
twenty five percent (25 %) of the non-door window area, except that no permit shall be required
for promotional window signs that cover ten percent (10%) or less of the non-door window
surface area.
4. The maximum duration for promotional signs, shall not exceed any of the
following prescribed time periods:
consecutive days); or,
Up to two (2) consecutive Temporary Sign Events, (ie. thirty (30)
b. A total of four (4) Temporary Sign Events per calendar year.
D. Grand Opening. Interim and Special Event Siens. Grand opening, interim, and
special event signs are permitted in the C-1, C-P, C-P-S, C-T, and M-SC zones and shall
comply with the appropriate requirements listed below:
1. For each use or business activity; up to one (1) sign may be allowed.
Except for a use or business activity with frontage on two or more arterial streets, then up to
two (2) signs may be allowed.
2. Grand opening signs may be permitted once in the first ninety (90) days
of business operation.
3. Interim signs are for interim and emergency purposes and shall contain
only the business name and logo.
4. Special event signs for special events shall be located close to the activity
or event being advertised,
5. Signs for communitywide events and activities, such as the Tractor Races
or the Temecula Wine and Balloon Festival, are allowed only on the site of the proposed event
and are issued only to the organization or individuals organizing or promoting the event.
6. All Grand opening, interim and special event signs shall be attached to the
building where the use or activity is located and shall comply with the following requirements:
a. The maximum height of the top of any sign shall not exceed the top
of the cave line or parapet wall of the building where the use or activity is located.
requirements:
The dimensions of any sign shall not exceed any the following
(1) The surface area shall not exceed thirty (30) square feet.
feet.
(2)
The height (vertical dimension) shall not exceed three (3)
S\,$16NCOMMXTEbfPSIGIq .AR 16
(3) The width (horizontal dimension) shall not exceed fifty
percent (50%) of the business or store frontage, whichever is smaller.
c. Grand opening, interim and special event signs may be allowed for
any period up to forty-five (45) days. The Director of Planning may allow one time extension,
for any period up to thirty (30) days, with good cause. It is the responsibility for the proponent
of the extension to justify why the extension is appropriate.
E. Hardship Provision. The Director of Planning may approve a Hardship Situation
Temporary Sign Permit in cases of extreme hardship and unusual circumstances relating to the
property where the business is located, including off-site construction activities that may disrupt
the public's ms to the business. Hardship Situation Temporary Signs shall be granted only
when, because of special circumstances applicable to the property, the strict application of the
Temporary Sign Ordinance deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the
vicinity and under the identical zoning classification.
1. The proponent of a request for a hardship situation temporary sign shall
be responsible for clearly demonstrating that an extreme hardship and unusual circumstance
exists, and that the extreme hardship and unusual circumstances warrants the approval of a
hardship situation temporary sign, and that strict implementation of the Temporary Sign
Ordinance deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under
the identical zoning classification.
2. The Director of Planning may issue a Temporary Sign Permit for a
hardship situation for any period up to six (6) months. Determination of the number, size, and
location of temporary signs for hardship' situations shall be at the discretion of the Director of
Planning.
3. Any hardship temporary sign permit issued shall be conditioned to ensure
that said permit does not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations
upon other properties in the vicinity and in the same zone, to ensure compatibility with the
surrounding area and to protect the public health, safety or welfare.'
Section 4.
as follows:
Section 19.10 is added to Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 and shall read
"Section 19.10. TEMPORARY SIGNS IN HISTORIC OLD TOWN TEMECULA.
No person shall erect, place or install any temporary sign in Historic Old Town Temecula in
violation of the provisions of this Ordinance. For the purpose of this Ordinance, temporary
signs do not include For Sale, Lease or For Rent Signs (which are regulated by Section 19.5),
Temporary Political Signs (which are regulated by Section 19.7), or seasonal window displays
than contain traditional holiday characters and messages and which are intended to create or
enhance holiday character of an area and do not reference or display service available or
rendered, or goods produced, sold or available for sale.
SXSX~CO~nTE~SX~ .A~ 17
A. Permit Required. A Temporary Sign Permit shall be required prior to the placing,
erecting, or installing of any promotional, special event, grand opening, or interim sign. All
such temporary signs shall comply with the provisions of this ordinance and all other applicable
laws and ordinances. An application for a permit shall be made on the forms and in the manner
specified by the Director of Planning and shall be accompanied by the required fees or removal
bond set by resolution of the City Council. Thereafter, the following procedure shall govern
the application for, and issuance of, all temporary sign permits under this ordinance:
1. Within ten (10) working days of receipt of a completed application for a
temporary sign permit, the Director of Planning shall either:
a. Issue the temporary sign permit,' if the sign(s) that is the subject of
the application conforms in every respect with the requirements of this ordinance; or
b. Reject the sign permit if the sign(s) that is subject of the application
fails in any way to conform with the requirements of this ordinance. In the case of a rejection,
the Director of Planning shall specify in the rejection the section or sections of the ordinance
with which the sign(s) is inconsistent.
2. In addition to the temporary sign standards listed in this section, the
Director of Planning may attach any approval conditions deemed necessary to ensure the
compatibility with the surrounding area and to protect public health, safety, or welfare.
B. Old Town Local Review Board. The Director of Planning is hereby authorized
to consult with the Old Town ~ Review Board to prepare any supplemental requirements
regulating the size, shape, materials, color, or character of temporary signs in Historic Old
Town Temecula that the Director deems necessary to maintain the character of Old Town.
C. Prohibitions. All Temporary signs not expressly permitted by this Ordinance are
prohibited, including but not limited to the following:
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
10.
11.
12.
Portable signs, including, but not limited to animals, human beings,
A-Frames, T-Frames, and those of a similar nature.
Vehicle mounted signs.
Pennants and streamers.
Promotional signs, except as permitted by this Section.
Interim signs, except as permitted by this Section.
Special event signs, except as permitted by this Section.
Grand opening signs, except as permitted by this Section.
Window signs occupying more than ten percent (10%) of the non-door
window area or six (6) square feet, whichever is greater.
Flashing or rotating temporary signs.
Off-site temporary signs.
Temporary roof signs.
Temporary signs on public property or in the public right-of-way.
SX,qlGNCOM!~TEMI~IGN.AR 18
D. Promotional Signs in Historic Old Town Temeeula. Promotional signs in Historic
Old Town Temecula are permitted in the C-l, C-P, C-P-S, and M-SC zones and shall comply
with the requirements listed below:
may be allowed.
For each use or business activity; up to one (1) attached promotional sign
2. Promotional signs in Historic Old Town Temecula shall be attached to the
building where the use or business activity is located and shall comply with the following
requirements:
a. The maximum height of the top of any temporary sign shall not
exceed the top of the cave line or panpet wall of the building where the use or activity is
located. No pwmotional sign shall be erected or placed so as to interfere with normal pedestrian
and vehicular traffic.
b. The surface area shall not exceed twelve (12) square feet.
c. Promotional signs shall be made of non-glossy material with a
fabric or cloth-like appearance and shall use dull, non-primary, non-~uorescent, and non-
iridescent colors.
3. The maximum duration for any promotional sign, for any business use or
activity, shall not exceed any of the foilowing standards:
consecutive days); or,
Up to two (2) consecutive Temporary Sign Events, (ie. thirty (30)
b. A total of four (4) Temporary Sign Events per calendar year.
E. Grand Opening. Interim and Special Event Signs in Historic Old Town Temecula.
Grand opening, interim, and special event signs in Historic Old Town Temecula are permitted
in the C-l, C-P, C-P-S, and M-SC zones and shall comply with the requirements listed below:
1. For each use or business activity; up to one (1) grand opening or interim
sign may be allowed.
business operation.
Grand opening signs are permitted once in the first ninety (90) days of
3. Interim signs are for interim and emergency purposes and shall contain
only the business name and logo.
4. Special event signs for special events shall be located close to the activity
or event being advertised.
SXSIG'NCOMMXTEMPSIGN.AR 19
5. Signs for communitywide events and activities, such as the Tractor Races
or the Temecula Wine and Balloon Festival, are allowed only on the site of the proposed event
and are issued only to the organization or individuals organizing or promoting the event.
6. Grand opening, interim and special event signs in Historic Old Town
Temecula shall be attached to the building where the use or activity is located and shall comply
with the following requirements:
a. The maximum height of the top of any sign shall not exceed the top
of the cave line or parapet wall of the building where the use or activity is located.
b. The dimensions of any grand opening, interim or special event signs
shall not exceed a surface area of twelve (12) square feet.
c. Shall be made of non-glossy material with a fabric or cloth-like
appearance and shall use dull, non-primary, non-fluorescent, and non-iridescent colors.
d. Grand opening, interim and special event Signs may be allowed for
any period up to forty-five (45) days. The Director of Planning may allow one time extension,
for any period up to thirty (30) days, with good cause. It is the responsibility of the proponent
of the extension to justify why the extension is appropriate.
F. Hardship Provision. The Director of Planning may approve a Hardship Situation
Temporary Sign Permit in Historic Old Town Temecula in cases of extreme hardship and
unusual circumstances relating to the property where the business is located, including off-site
construction activities that may disrupt ~he public's access to the business. Hardship Situation
Temporary Signs shall be granted only when, because of special circumstances applicable to the
property, the strict application of the Temporary Sign Ordinance deprives the property of
privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under the identical zoning classification.
1. The proponent of a request for a hardship situation temporary sign shall
be responsible for clearly demonstrating that an extreme hardship and unusual circumstance
exists, and that the extreme hardship and unusual circumstances warrants the approval of a
hardship situation temporary sign, and that strict implementation of the Temporary Sign
Ordinance deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under
the identical zoning classification.
2. The Director of Planning may issue a Temporary Sign Permit for a
hardship situation for any period up to six (6) months. Determination of the number, size, and
location of temporary signs for hardship situations shall be at the discretion of the Director of
Planning.
3. Any hardship temporary sign permit issued shall be conditioned to ensure
that said permit does not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations
upon other properties in the vicinity and in the same zone, to ensure compatibility with the
surrounding area and the Old Town Specific Plan, and to protect the public health, safety or
welfare."
s~sxo~co~a~xr~,,~sx6~.^R 20
Section 5. Violations It shall be unlawful for any person to violate any
provision of this ordinance. Any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall be
deemed guilty of an infraction or misdemeanor as hereinafter specified. Such person shall be
deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any
violation of any of the provisions of this ordinance is committed, continued, or permitted.
Any person so convicted shall be, (1) guilty of an infraction offense and punished by a free not
exceeding One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) for a first violation; and {2) guilty of an infraction
offense and punished by a fine not exceeding Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) for a second
infraction. A third and any additional violation shall constitute a misdemeanor offense and shall
be punishable by a fine not to exceed One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) or six (6) months in
jail, or both. Notwithstanding the above, a first offense may be charged and prosecuted as a
misdemeanor. Payment of any penalty herein shall not relieve a person from the responsibility
for correcting any violation.
Section 6. Severability The City Council hereby declares that the provisions
of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold
any sentence, paragraph, or section of this ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect
the validity of the remaining parts of this ordinance.
Section 7. CEOA Compliance The City Council finds that the regulation of
temporary signs in existing commercial, industrial, and retail zones has no possibility of having
a significant impact on the environment. As a result, the adoption of these regulations is exempt
from environmental review pursuant to the provisions of Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA
Guidelines prepared pursuant to Section 21083 of the California Environmental Quality Act, as
amended.
Section 8. Effective Date This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty
(30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and
cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, this day llth day of August, 1992.
PATRICIA H. BIRDSALL
MAYOR
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
SXSIGNCOMMVr~J~IGN.AR 21
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
ORDINANCE NO. 348, ARTICLE XIX
(ADVERTISING REGULATIONS)
SXSI~CO~m~Tm~S~.~R 22
ARTICLE
A~VE~TISING REGUL~kTIDNS
SECTION 19.1. PU~P0SE AND INTENT. Because Riverside County is a large,
diverse and rapidly expanding jurisc$iction the Board of Supervisors finas t'.at
prope~ control t$ necessary to provi~ f~r the preservation aria protection
Of open space and scenic a~eas, the many na~ral an~ mandate resources,
established r~ral c~unittes ~tnin Riverside County.
. · royida standards to smfegumr~ life, health, property an~ t~e
her Sign users by pro~ibt tng~n o e r~o al an~
location an~ maintena c
limitation of use of signs ~t~in the unincorporated area of Riverside Cour, ty.
All outdoor a~vertising ~isplay$ and ~n-$tte advertising Structures and signs
tn the unincorpormte~ area of t~e County of Riverside s~all confo~ to the
applicable provisions ~f this article. %f any specific zoning classification
within this ordinance shall impose more'Stringent requtr~ent$ than are set
fort~ within this article, the m~re stringent provisions shall prevail.
~-.ended Effecttve:
SE:TION 19.2. DEFINITIONS. For purposes of this ordinance, the followin;
wor~s or phrases shall nave the following ~efinttions.
e g
including on-site m~ g '
out~oor m~vertising ~isplmy may ~ c~only known or referre~ to as an
'off-site" or an ~ff-pr~ise$' billNard.
b. "Outdoor Advertising )truc~re' means m $truc~re of any kind or
Character erecte~ or maintaine~ for Out~oor a~vertisin~ ~rposes, upon
which any poster, bill, printing, painting ~r other advertiseant of
any kind ~atsoever may N placed, including $tm~ary, for
a~vertising Nr~ses. ~uch $truc~re s~mll N constructed or erecte~
upon m )manant f~undation or shall N attached to m structure having
m peaanent foun~tt~n.
'c. 'Outdoor Advertising $~gn' means any card, cloth, paper, metal
painted, plastic or ~o~n sign ~f any character place~ for out~Dr
a~vertising ~rpoSeS, ~n or to the groun~ ~r any tree, wall,
rock, fence, buil4ing, $truc~re ~r tntn~, either privately or
publicly ~wne~, ~t~er than an m~vertistn~ st~cture-
d. The ~rds 'Outdoor Advertising ~truc~re' mn~ 'Out~or Advertising
~ign' ms ~fine~ in subsections {b} and {c) ~ not tnclu~:
1. Official notices issued by any c~urt or public bo~y or
Notices posted by any public officer in performance of a pu~l i:
duty or by any person in giving legal notice;
3, Directtonal, warning or information structures requtree by or
authorized by law or by Federal, State or County authority;
Including signs necessary for the operation and safety of p~l i"
utility uses.
4, A structure erected near a city or county boundary, which contains
the nwne of SuCh City Or county and the n~nes of, or any Other
infOrmatiOn rlglrdtng, civic, fraternal or religious or;anizations
located therein.
e. "On-~tte Advertising Structure and Signs' means any structure,
housing, Sign device, figure, statuary, painting, display, messa.:e -"
placard, or other contrivance, or Iny part thereof, which iS desi;ne~,,
constructed, created, engineered, intended, or used to advertise, or
to provide ~ta or information in the nature of adverl;istng, for any
of the ,~ol 1 ow4 ng purposes:
(1) To designate, identify, or indicate the ngne of the business of
the owner or occupant of the print soS upon which the $tru:~ure or
Sign is located.
(2) To advertise the ~stness conducted, servtces avatla}~e or
rendered, or the goods producerS, sold, or available for sale,
upon the praises where the structure or sign is locate~.
f. "Freeway" means a divided arterial highway for through traffic
full control of access and w~th grade separations at intersections.
g. "Highway" means roads, streets, bo~Jlevlrd$, lanes, courts, places,
coc=..ons, trails, ways or Other r~ghts-of-way or eaS~nen~s use= for or
laid out and intended for the public passage of vehicles or of
vehicles and persons.
h. "Edge of a' Right-of-way" means a measureant frm the edge of
right-of-way horizontally along a line normal or perpendicular to the
centerline Of the freeway or h~ghway.
t. 'Maximum Height" means the highest point of the structure or sicn
measured fr~n the average natural ground level at the base of t~e
supporting structure.
· Free Standing Sign" means any sign which iS supported by one or more
columns or uprights irabedded in the ground, and which is not attached
to any INil dtn~ or structure·
'Surface Area" means that area of outdoor advertising signs and
on-site advertising signs as measured by the smallest gecrnetric
such as m square, rectangle, triangle, or circle, or cmbination
thereof, which w~ll encwnpass the face of the sign on which the
message ts dtsplayec~.
243
'Directional Sign' means a sign used to direct and control
or pedestrian trlffic that iS located upon the s~ne parcel
the use that it t s intended to serve.
1. "For Sale, ),ease or Rent Sign" means a sign advertising that t.~e
property or StruCture upon ~t~tch the sign is locate~ is for sale,
1 ease, or rent.
m. 'ShOpping Center' means a par:el of land not less than 2 acres in
size, on which there exists 4 or more separate business uses that ~ave
mutual parking factlt ties.
ve.hi cul ar
n. of l an~ as
o. 'Significant Resources' meln~ any county, state or federal site wnic~
has SignifiCant Or potentially significant social, cultural,
historical, archaeological, recreational Or scenic resources, or wnicn
plays or potentially could play a significant role in promoting
tourism. For the purposes of this article, the term significant
resources shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
1. Riveritde National Cemetery. A strip, 660 feet in width, measure~
fran the edge of the right-of-way line on both sides of 1-215 fr~.~
the intersection Of Van Buren Boulevard southerly to Nance Roa~,
an~ on both sides of Van Burart Boulevard from the intersection of
1-215 westerly to Wood Road.
2. Scenic HighwayS.
). A corridor SOD feet in width adjacent to both si~es of all
highways within three-tenths (2/10) of a mile of any Regional,
State or Federal park or recreation area.
p. 'Scenic Highway' means any officially designated state or county
scenic highway as defined in Streets and Highway Code Sections 154 an~
Z~l et seq.
q. 'Illegal Outdoor Advertising Display' means any of the followin;:
(1} An outdoor advertising structure or outdoor advertisin~ sign
erected without first canplying with all applicable county
ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of its
construction, erection or use.
(2} An outdoor advertising structure or outdoor advertising sign t~at
was legally erected but whose use has ceased, or the struc~re
upon which the advertising display ts placed has been abandone~
by its owner, and not maintained or used for I period of not less
than one (1) year.
{3} An outdoor advertising structure or outdoor advertising sign that
was legally erected which later became nonconforming as a result
of the adoption of an ordinance; the IltorttZatlofi period for the
display provided by the ordinance rendering the display
nonconforming has expired; and conformante has GOt been
acca~pl i shed.
(4) An outdoor advertising structure or outdoor advertising sign
which does not canply with the Notice of Decision or the approved
plot plan.
244
re
An outdoor idvertt $t ng strut tu re or outdoor adverti s i ng s i gn
which iS a danger to the public or is unsafe as may be Determine'-
by the Director of the Bull dtng and Safety Department.
An outdoor advertising Structure or outdoor advertising Sign
which iS a traffic hazard as may be etenntned by the Director'i.
the lulldang and Safety Department provided said traffic nazar.
was not created by the relocation of streets or highways or by
acts of .the County.
any of the
(1) An on-site advertising structure or sign erected without first
complying with all applicable County ordinances an~ regulations
in effect at the time of its construction, erection or use.
(2} An on-site advertising structure or sign that was legally
erected, but whose uses hIS ceased, or the StruCture upon which
the advertising display is placed has been aban~one~ by its
owner, and not maintained or used to identify or advertise an
ongoing business for a period of not less than ninety {gO} eays.
{3) An on-site advertising Structure or sign that was legally eretree
which later beCgne nonconforming aS a result of the aCoption of
an ordinance; the anorttZattOn period for the display proviOe~ by
the ordi nonce renders ng the dtspl my nonconformS ng has expi red;
and COnformante has not been accmpltshed.
(4) An on-site advertising structure or sign which is a danger to the
public or is unsafe as may be determined by the Director of the
Bull dang and Safety Depar~nent.
{5} An on-site advertising structure or sign which is a traffic
hazard as may be gletermined by the DireCtOr Of the Bull mine one
Safety Department provided said traffic hazard was not createe_?y
the relocation of streets or highways or by acts of the Count
'Illegal On-Site Advertising Structure or Sign" means
fol 1 owl ng.
"Abandoned" means el that:
{1) Any outdoor advertising display that is allowed to continue for
more than one (1) year without a poster, bill, printing,
painting, or other form of advertisement or message; or
(2) Any outdoor advertising display that does not appear on the
inventory required by Section 19.3.a.(153; or
(3) Any on-site advertising structure or sign that is allowed to
continue for more than ninety (903 days without a poster, bill,
printing, painting, or other form of advertising or message for
the purposes set forth in Section 19.2.e hereof.
knended Effectt re:
07-16-85 (Ord. 348.2496}
06-20-89 (Ord. 348.2989)
SECTION 19.3. OUTDOOR ADVERTISING DISPLAYS. No person shall erect or
maintain an outdoor advertising display in the unincorporated area of the
County of Riverside, except in accord, rice with the following provisions.
245 _
The changtn~ of an advertiSIng message or oustmary maintenance o~ a
legally extsttng outdoor advertising o~splay Shall not Pequtre a pe~m~
pursuant to tht.s section,
a. Standards ·
1. Zoning, Outdoor advertising display are petalteed only tn the
C-t/C-P, I~SC, N-N and N-H zones and providing only that the
display meets iI1 of the other requJrments of the zontn9
clasSIfiCation and this irttcle. 0utter id~rt~stn~ ~tsplays a~e
expPessl~ prohibited tn 111 other ~s,
Z, Spa=trig, ~ out~or ld~rt~s(ng dJspl~ Shall ~ located
ft~ ~ndred (500) feet ~n in~ ~rect~on frm any o~r outdoor
idverttsJng d~spl~ on tM sine s~ of the h~gh~ay; prov~de~,
however, thlt tf tn I particular zone i ~fferent 1neerye1 sha~
~ stated, the spa=(ng ~ntervll Of the pirttcula~ zone shall
preva(1, No outGoor idve~1stng d~spll~ shill ~ erected
the ~undl~ of In~ s(gnJf~cint resource l$ 6eftned tn Section
~9,2,o, of thtS o~Jnance, No outGoor advertising d~sp~a~ sha~l
~ located ~th~n one ~nared ftft~ (~S0) feet of propert~
~(ch t~ zontng ~es ~t allow i4~rttstng ~splays prov~de~
hoover, that in out~or id~rttstng e~splay may be placee
o~ ~ndred (250) feet of property for ~ch zoning ~es no~
displays, tf it the t(me an Upl(catton for in out~or addressing
~spli~ ~m~t tS Ippl(ed for, t~re Is ~ ex~sttng resJOent~al
st~c~ or in ~proved ~(ld~ng ~m(t for a resl~nt~al
st~cture ~thin one ~n~red fifty (~50) feet of the location o~
the proposed outGoor id~rttstng ~spliy, ~
3, Hei ha, The mix~m hetght of In outdoor idvertts ng ~sp a~
shi~l not exceed i ~ght Of t~nt~-fJ~ (25) feet frm the
road~d of the adjacent frevl~ or h~ghwa~ to ~ch the d~spla~
oftented, or I maxtram ~tght of t~nt~-ftve (ZS) feet frm the
griGe on e~ch tt ~s consteered, ~chever ts
4. Poles, A maxtram of t~ (2) steel poles ire illowed for suppor~
.of In outdoor adore(sing ~spliy.
~of Hounts. ~ out~or iG~rtts ng ~sp ~
5. ~ I shall ~ aff~xee on
or over t~ ~of of any ~(l~ng and no ~splay shall ~ affixed
to t~ fie11 of a ~t1~n~ so that It pro~ects above the parape~
the ~tlttng, For tM W~oses of th~s section, ~ mansard style
~of shall ~ co~t~red a partHe,
6, ~r of Displa s, ~ more ~an one (Z) proposed outdoor
aevert~Stng ~sPTay ~pltcatlon shall ~
~r
7, h~acks, ~ out6oor advertising ~splay shall ~ erec~e~
an established setback or ~(lttng 11n~, o~ ~thtn road
. . r~ght-of-way l~nes or ~ ~a~ right-of-way l(nes as sho~ on
any S~ctftc Plan of Htghwa~, A mtntmm sethick frm the
property 1the of one (1) foot shill ~ requ~re~,
8.' Nm~r of Dts~lay Faces. No mo~ than t~ (Z) dtspl~ faces ~
outdoor ie~rtlstng ~splay shill N Nmttted. Back-to-back
V-tyN ~spla~ shall ~ allowed p~ovt~e~ that they Ere on the
sine ~teoor advertising st~c~ure End provided that the V-t~pe
246
dtsplays have a soDaration between dtsplay faces of not .~o~e *,nan
twenty°five (Z5) feet.
g. Lighting and ]:l~b~ntnatton of DIsplays. An outdoor a~ver~s~n;
dtsp~a~ ma~ ~ t~l~tnlted, unless other~se sNctf~ee. prov~
I~e so co~s~r~c e , ·
tha~ the ~spliys t d tha~ no 11ght ~1~
Or Slmtlar souse of 11lintnation ~s visible be~n~
ft 1 ~ent.
~tspla~ flee. D(spl8~ making use of lights to conve~ the effect
of mov~ent o~ fllshtng, tntemtttent. or va~ta~le ~n~e~sit~ snal~
not N Nmttte~. Dtspl8~ shall use the mos~ earanted methods =o
tnSuPe t~ most ene~ efficient metho~ of d~sp~a~
~tth~n the Palmar 0bservltor~ SHetel L¢ghting Area, 811
shill cmpl~ ~th the requ~rments of RI vers~ ae Coun~ 0r~nan:e
NO. 655.
t0. DtSplI~ ~vment. No ~t~oor advertising ~spla~s sha]~ move or
Potlee. to ~s~l~ In~ moving and/or meeting parts.
an~ no
p~opelle~, flags, or other netse creating ~vices,
iPchttec~al ~belltsments ~tch uttltze mechanical o~ natural
forces for morton, shill ~ Nmttte~. Use of aa~ligh~
mater~ ale or electronic message ~a~es us1 ng fl ash~ rig,
tntemtttent or ~vtng 11ght Or ltghB IS prohibited. prov~ed,
hoover, that electronic message ~lr~ d~spla~ng on]~ ~(me
Ink/or tmNrltu~e for Nrio~s of not less than thirt~ (30)
secon~ i s Nmi teed.
Display Face Size. No outdoor addraising ~splay sha~ have a
total surface area of mo~ than three ~ndred (300) s0ua~e feet.
ZZ. ~teoor Ad~tising Display remit Re~i~ed. No ~rson shall
erect. alter, repli~. or relocate any out~or a~Ptisin~ dis;~ay
~thout first ~tainin an outdoor adventlain ~splay ~it
pursuant to Rive~i~ ~ount~ Ordinance NO. 45~. No
advertising ~splay Hmit shiql ~ issued unless an~ until '~
Bui 1 ding Di rector ~temi nes that the proposed acti vi ty i s i ~.
actor=ante ~th this Article and Riverside is in accoraan~e
this Arti=le and Ri,~ide County Ordinance No. 457, ana that the
applicant has obtained I valid State Outdoor Advertising Hmat.
~3. Zffntiftcation. NO HPson shall place, erect. or maintain an
outdoor adverti sing f splay and no outdoor adve~ti sing di sp~ ay
shall ~ placed, erect. or maintainin1 any~ere ~thin the
unincorporated area of Rive~iee ~ount~ unless there ~s securely
fastened thereto and on the front display face thereof the
' the
Of t~ outaoor advertising ~splay ~er in such , manner that
nine tS visible frm t~ highray. Any titsplay pla~e~, erected,
maintained ~thout this identification shill ~ ~e~ to ~
placed, e~cte~, ind maintained in violation of this section.
t4. Nobale Displays. ~ H~on shall pl:ce maintain, or other~se
allw a mobile ,hicle. trailer, or other advertisin~ ~isp~ay not
as ,f~ne~ in Section
Hmanently affixed to the ground,
of this ordinance, to ~ used as in out~or advertising ~sp a~.
tS. ~splay ~nventory. [n or~r ~ evalute, and assess
advertising fspla~ ~thin the unincor~rated area of Riverside
County, ~thin one ~nared eight~ (Z80) ~ys of the effective
247
of this ordinance and on each ftfth (5) anniversary after the
effective ~te of this ordinance, each ~tsplay capany with
outdoo.r advertising displays within the untncorporate~ area of
Riverside County shall submit to the Department of Builc$ing an~
Safety, a current %riventory of the outdoor advertising ~ispl ays
they currently own and/or maintain within the unincorporate~ area
of Riverside County. Failure to submit a current or accurate
inventory shall be deEned to be a separate violation of this
ordi nonce.
Process1 ng Procedure-
1. Application. In addition to all other applicable Federal, State.
and local laws, rules, regulations and ordinances, no outc~or
advertising display shall be placed or erected until a permit
therefore has been issued by the Riverside County Planning
Director, on the form provided by the Planning Department
acc~npanted by the filing fee set forth in Ordinance No.
meeting the requirEpantS of Section 1B.30 of this ordinance. Sai~
application shall also consist of ten (10) copies of a Plot Plan
drawn to scale, containing the nape, address or telephone number
Of the applicant, a copy of the current valid State Outdoor
~dvertistng Permit, and a general description of the property upon
which the outdoor advertising display is proposed to be placate.
In addition, the applicant shall provide sufficient number of
address labels as dee.~ed appropriate by the Planning Director for
all property owners within a five hundred foot (500') radius of
any proposed out~or advertising display. The Plot Plan shall
show the precise location, type, and size of the propose~ outs-Dor
advertising displays, all property lines, zoning, and the
dimensions, location of and distance to the nearest a~vertising
displays, building, business districts, significant resources as
determined by the ordinance, public and private roads, an~ other
rightS-of-way, building setback lines, and specifically planned
future road right-of-way lines, and any and all other information
required by the Planning Director in such a manner that the
proposed display may be readily ascertained, identified, and
evil u ated.
Hearing and Notice of Decision. Upon acceptance of an application
for an out~or advertising display as caplate, the Planning
Oi rector shal 1 transit t a copy of the appl i cats on to the
De mr)ant of Building and Safety for review and cement.
(a~ Not less than thirty (30) days after acceptance of the
~ltcatton for outdoor advertising dtsplty as c~nplete, the
the Planntng Director's decision on the application is to be
made. Not less than ten (10) clays prior to the date on ~nic~
the decision is to be made, the Planning Director shall give
notice of the proposed outdoor advertising display, by mail
or delivery, to all owners shown on the last equalized
assessment rol 1, an~ any updates, as owns ng real property
Z48
(b)
vithtn I five hundred (500) foot radtus of the exterio~
boundaries of the par:el upon w~ich the proposed OuT.~oor
advertising ~spla,y ts tO be located. Notice of the
outdoor advertising crisplay shell also be gtven by
publication tn a newspaper of general CIrculation wdt~i~
Riverside Count.v, The Nottee Shall include the
that no public hearing ~11 be held unless a hearin~ is
requested, tn ~r~ttlng, and delivereel to the Planning
at least t~o (2) da~S before the date scheduled fop the
dectston ts to be made. No public hearing on the
for In outdoor advertising dtspla,v shall be held before a
derision ~s made by the Planning Director, unless a hear~n~
IS requested, in tn-tt~ng~ by the applicant o~ othe~
tritereSted persons or tf the Planning Dtrector ee:em~nes
that a publtc hearing should be required. if no
hearing ts requested or rlqutrld, the Plann~nc.} Director
gtve the Nottee of hctston to the applicant and any
perSOn ~hO has made a ~ttten request for a ~opy of the
Netted of hctston. The doetalon of the Planning
shall be Considered f'inal unless ~lthtn ten (~0) days of
date of malltrig of the Nottce of h~tston to the
an appeal t~refrm ts f~led.
~f a publlc hea~tng tsr, qut~ed un~r the provision o~
subsection, notice of the time, date, an~ place of the
hea~ng ~fo~e the Planning Dtrlctor and a general
~sc~pt~on of the lOCatton O~ the real p~ope~7 ~h~ch ~s the
subject of the hea~ng, Sh,ll ~ gtven a~ least ten (~0) da~s
p~Or tO the h,a~ng as follo~:
(~) Natltng o~ deltaring to ~11 o~e~s o~ ~eal p~oper~t
~ch ts located ~thtn I 50~foot radius of the
exte~o~ ~unaa~es of the pe~cel u~n ~h~ch the
p~opose~ outdoo~ advertising ~spla~ ~s to ~
1St SUCh O~e~ ape $ho~ oR the last equalized
assessment ~11 ,nd any updates.
(2) The Planntng DtPector ml~ Pequtre that additional no~ce
~ ~ven tn an~ other matter the DtPector
nec,ssa~ or d, st~,ble.
if I ~bllc hearing ts ~qut~edt the Plannin~ D~ector sha~
hea~ Palevent testimony fP~ tritePasted persons and make
~ctston ~thtn a ~asonable tlme after the close o~ the
~bllC hea~ng. A Not(ca of Dectston shall ~ f(le~ b7 the
Planntng Dtrector ~th t~ Clerk o~ the Board o~
not mo~ than ftfteen (ZS) da~ afte~ the ~c~s~on. A cop~
of the Nottee of hctS(on Shall ~ matled to the apple can:
and to In~ ~son vho his ml~ I ~ttten request fop a
of the iceston. The aePk of t~ Boar~ o~ ~pe~v~so~s shall
place the NOtice of Dealston on t~ next agen~i of the
of ~HPVtSO~ he16 ~ve (5) or ~ ~Ts after the Clerk
~:etves the Notice of hcts~on f~m the Planning
249
Appeals. The dectston of the Planntng Director sl~a]~ I~e
considered ftnal unless In appeal therefrarn is filetS.
(a) Appeals to Plenntng Cmmtsston. The applican~ or
· tnteres~ NrSon may fi~e an anneal, accm~an~e~ by ~ne fee
set forth tn 0rdtnince No. 67~ Of t~IS OrdinanCe, and on
fore prOvt dad by the P1 ann1 ng Depar~en~ ~ ~nt n ~en ( ~0
afte~ the Notice Of ~CtStOn tS mailed fo~ ~hose ma~ers
~ere I ~bltc hearing was not requested or reQu~e~ or
~thtn ten (20) da~ after ~he No~lce of Beetston ap~ea~s on
t~ Board of kpervtsor's agenda. The appeal shall s~8~e ~ne
reasons uh~ tttS be~teved the actton of the P~ann~ng
Dtrec~or ts tinproper. Upon recetpt of a cmp]e~e~ appeal an~
fee, the P~anntng Dtrector Shl]~ set the ma:~er fo~
before ~he Planning C~tsston. No~tce of ~e hearing on
apNa~ sh81~ ~ gt~n tn the s~e manner tha~ no~ce was
t.n the s~e manner that no~tce was g~ven under
the appeal vt~hin ten (20) ~ys of the c~osing of
hearing, A Nottce of the Beetston of ~he P~ann~ng
sna].] N ft~ed by the P~inntng Director ~h ~he Boa~a of
SuN~visors, not more than ftfteen (~5) da~ af~e~
~ciston. A copy of ~he NObtEe Of Beetston Sha]~ N
w~tCten ~equest for I cop~ of C~e lcts~on. The C~e~k of
Boar~ of SuN~v~sors, s~ll~ p~ace the No~tce of Derision
the nex~ agen~l of the Board of ~perv~sors, he~ f~ve
mo~e da~ after the C~erk receives the NO~tce of Decision
~he P~ 8nn~ n~
fr~ the P~ Inni ng D~ rector. The 2~i si on of
C~tss~On Shill ~ considered f~na] unless ~n
therefr~ ts filed.
(b) Appeals to Boatel of Supervisors. The ~cis~on of the
Planning CabmiSSion Shill be considereal final unless an
appeal therefrm is filed. The applicant or an ~nte~es~ea
Nrson ma~ f~le in ipNll, accmpan~e~ b~ ~he fee set
tn 0rd~nance No. 671 of this Or~nlnce, an~ on the fore
provided b~ the Pl8nntng Deplr~lnt ~thtn ten (Z0) ~a~s
8fte~ t~ Notice of hcts~en of the Planning Cmm~ssion
appel~ on the Board of SuNr~sors's
igendi. The ~pell shill state the ~asons ~hy ~t ~s
Nlteved the ict~on of the Plinntng Cmtss~on is
Upon recetpt of I cmpleted ippeil ind fee, or t~ the
of $uNr~sen issmes ~u~isdtctton by orating the matter
set for ~bllc hearing, the Clerk of the Soar~ of Supervisors
shall set the matter for publlC hearing before the Boar~
SuH~so~, ~t less than ftve (5) ~a~s nor more than th~rt~
(30) ea~ thereafter, and shall gt~ nottce of the t~me
place of the heartng tn the sine manner as notice of the t~me
ane place of the heartng ~n the sine manner as nottee
van for the heartng ~fore the Planning C~ss~on. The
~ard o~ SuHrv~so~ Shall tenor ~ts ~ds~on ~th~n th(rt~
250
(30) days following the close of the hearing on the appeal.
The occasion of the Board of Supervisors snell be final.
Revocation. Any outdoor advertising ceisplay peanit which has
been .issued as a result of a material misrepresentation of fa~.
by the applicant or his agent, whether or not a criminal
prosecution is initiated therefor, may be summarily revoke~ by
the Planning Director who shall forthwith give written Notice of
Revocation to the applicant. Within thirty (30) days after
notice is given, any outdoor advertising display authorize~ by
said outdoor advertising display permit shall be r~ove~ at tne
appltcant's expense. Failure to reove the display within sai~
thirty (30) days shall be earned a separate violation of t~is
ordinance. Nothing in this ordinance shall authorize the
installation or maintenance of any outdoor aclvertising di splay
which is in violation of any State or Federal law or regulation.
c. Enforcement. Wherever the officials responsible for the enforceerie
of a~intstratton Of the Land Use Ordinance or their designate2
agents, have cause to suspect a violation of this article, or whenever
ne:essary to investigate either an application for the granting,
modification, Or any action to suspend or revoke an outdoor
advertising display permit, or whenever necessary tO investigate a
possible violation, said agents may lawfully gain access to the
appropriate parcel of land upon which said violation is believe~ to
exist. The followin) provisions shall apply to the violations of this
article:
1. All violations of this article Canmatted by any person, whether as
agent, ~ployee, officer, principal, or otherwise, shall be a
ml sde~eanor.
Z. Every person who knowingly provides false information on an
outdoor advertising display permit application shall be guilt)
a misdemeanor.
3. Every person who fails to stop work on an outdoor aevertising
display, when so ordered by the Director of Buileing and Safety or
the Planning Director, shall be guilty of a miscle~eanor.
4 Every person who, having receivee NotiCe tO Appear in court to
answer a related charge, w~llfully fails to appear, shall be guilty
of a mi s~eneanor.
5 A misdemeanor may be prosecuted by the County in the na~e of
People of the State of California, or may be redressed by civil
action. Each violation is punishable by m fine of not more t.~an
one thousand dollars (1,0DO.DO), or by imprisorrnent in the Codnay
jail for a term of not more than six {6) months, or by both fine
and tmpri so~nent.
6. Every person found guilty of a violation shall be cieemed guilty of
a separate offense for every day auring a portion of which the
violation iS c~mitted, continued, or permitted by such person.
7. Every illegal outcloor advertising ~lsplay and every abanmne~
outdoor advertising eisplay is hereby ceclared to be a public
nuisance and shall be subject to abetanent by repair,
rehabilitation, or removal in accordance with the procedures
contained in Section 3 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.
251
d. Nonconforming Signs, [very outdoor advertising dtsp~ay which does
conform tO this ordinance shall De aeene~ to De a nonconfon~inS
an~ shall be ranDyed or altered in accordance with this ordinance as
fol 10wS:
Any out=oor adverttstn~ c~Spla,v which was lawfully in existence
prior to the effective date of the enaCt;nent of Ordinance
348.2496 (July ~6, Zg85) Shall De abeted or brought into
conformante with these provisions by July Z7, Z990.
Any outdoor advertising dtsplay which was lawfully in existence
prior to the effective date of the enac~nent of Ordinance ;;o.
348,2856 (June 30, 1988) but mfter the effective date of the
enac)ent of Ordinance No. 348,2496 (july 16, 1985) shall be
abate~ or brought into conformance with these provisions by July
1, 1993.
3. Any outdoor advertising dtsplly which was lawfully in existence
prior to the effective date of Ordinance No. 348.2989 but after
the effective ~mte of the enactment of Ordinance No. 34B.Z856
(June 30, 1988) shall be abate{l or brought into confonr.,ance with
these provisions within eleven (11) years of the effective aate of
Ordinance No, 348. ZgBg.
4. If federal or state law requires the County of Riverside to pay
Just cunpensatton for the ranoval o'f any such lawfully erectec b.jt
nonconforming outdoor I~vertistng eliSplay, it may r~nain in place
until Just ca~pensmtton ms defined in the Eminent Domain Law
{Title 7, of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure) is paid.
e. Illegal and Abandoned Outdoor Aclverttstng Displays. All illegal
outdoor advertising displlys and mll abandone~ outdoor advertisin;
displays shall be renoveCJ or brought into conformante with t~is
ordi nanca immediately,
Amended Effectt yea
07-15-85 (Or~. 348.Z496)
06-30-88 (Ord. 348,2856)
O6-ZO-B9 (Oral, 348 ZgB9)
SECTION lg.4. ON-SITE ADVERTISING STRUCTURES AND SIGNS.
No person shall erect an on-stte advertising structure or sign in the
unincorporated area of the County of Riverside that ts in violation Of the
proviSiOnS contained within any Specific Zoning classification in this
ordinance or that iS in violation of the following provisions.
Free-standS ng St gns
1. Located within G60 feet of the nearest edge of a freeway right of
square feet in surface area. f t
b. The maximum Might of a sign shall not exceed ZO ee .
4. Number of Free-standing Signs - A11 Locations. Not more than one
free-standing sign shall be permitted on a parcel of land,
that if a ShOpping Center has frontage on g Or more streets,
shopping center Shall be permitted Z free-standing signs,
that the 2 Signs are not located on the send street; are at 1 t
lO0 feet apart and the second sign does not exceeO iO0 square feet
in surface area and 20 feet tn height.
way line.
IThe maximum height of a sign shall not excee~ aS fee:.
The maxtm~ surface area of a Sign Shall not exceeO 15~
square feet.
All Other Locations.
(a) The maximum height of a sign shall not exceed 2D feet.
(b) The maxtm~n surface area of a sign shall not exceed 50 sq;a-e
feet, /
$hopptng Centers - A11 Locattons.
Notwithstanding the provisions of sub-paragraphs 1 and 2, an
alternate standard for free standing on-site advertising si;ns for
shopping centers is established as follows:
(a) the maxtmu.~ subace area of a sign shall not exceed 50 sqjare
feet of ,ZS percent (1/4 of 1S) of the total existant.
building floor area in a shopping center-, whichever is
greater, except that in any event, no sign shall exceed 20~
Signs Affixed to buildings - All Areas
1. No on-site advertising sign Shall be affixed on, above or over the
roof of any building, and no on-site advertising sign shall be
affixed to the wall of a building so that it projects above the
parapet of the building. For the purposes of this Section, a
mansore style roof shall be considered a parapet.
2. The maxtm~n surface area of signs affixed to a building shall be
as follows:
( a ) F font wal 1 of but 1 ei ng -
The surface area of the Sign shall not exceed lO: of the
surface area of the front face of the bull dang.
(b) Side walls of a ~tlding -
The surface area of the Sign shall not exceed lo% of the
surface area of the sic face of the building.
( c ) Re ar wal 1 of a ~ t 1 ding -
The surface area of the sign shall not exceed 5; of the
surface area of the rear face of the building.
253
c. Directtonal Signs - Directtonal signs' to:advise.patrons of location.
distance or purpose shall ~e permitted on a parcel of land as folio.s:
1. The maxamen height of such signs shall not exceed 3 feet.
2. The maximum surface area of such s~gfis sh8~ no~ exceed G square
feeC.
d. On-s~e ~denUftca~ton Stgns- On-s~e tden~ifica:~on s~gns aff~xe~ ~.~
the surface of walls, windows, and ~oo~ of Nmanent structures.
which do not excee~ 4 inches tn letter height and ~ not excee~ 4
square feet tn area are Nat tied tn addition to any other sign
pemitted tn this ordinance.
SECTION lg.S. FOR S~E, LE~E 0R RENT SIGNS. For sale, lease or rent
signs snell ~ Nmttte~ to N placed tn all zone classifications subject to
tne fol 1 owi ng regul Eta ons.
1. For one and two f~tly ~sidenUml uses - one sign not ex:eeain~
square feet in subace area and not more than ~ feet in height.
2'. For ~ltiple f~ily residential uses - one sign for each separate
frontre) on m street, each sign not to exceed TG square feet in
surface area and not more than 8 feet tn ~ight.
3. For cametotal uses - one sign for each separate frontage on a
street, each sign not to exceed Z4 square feet in surface area
not more than 8 feet tn height.
4. For inkstrial uses - one sign for each separate frontage on a
street, each sign not to exceed 3Z square feet tn s~rface area
not more than 1O feet tn ~eight.
5. For agricul~ uses - one sign for each separate frontage on a
street, each sign not to exceed 1G square feet in surface area an~
not more than B feet in height.
SEZTION lg.G SUBDIVISION SIGNS.
a. On-site subdivision signs, advertising the original sale of a
subdivision are permitted within the boundaries of a subdivision, upon
approval of a plot plan pursuant to Section 18.30 of this ordinance
and subject to the following mintm~ standards:
1. No sign shall exceed 100 square feet in area.
2. No Sign shall be within 100 feet of any existing residence that is
outside of tN subdivision boundaries.
3. No more than two such signs shall be bennttted for each
subtit vtston.
4. NO Sign Shall be artificially lighted.
zone clmssificmtions, except
the C-P-S, N-A, and W-1 Zones, provided m conditional use Nmit is
granted Nrsuant to t~e provisions of Section 1B.ZB of this ordinance,
an~ subject to the follo~ng mintm~ stanZarest
1. No sign shall excee~ 1D0 s~are feet jn area.
254
2. No sign shall be thin .OD feet of any existing resiaence.
3. No more than two ~ signs shall be pea, teed for each
subdivision.
4. The maximum pe~'iod of tine a sign may renain in place shall
years.
S. No St~n shall =e artifi~'tally lighted.
6. An agreement, ~ecured by a $100 cash bond, shall be executed wit.-.
tl~e County for each sign, assuring the removal of the sign within
e ~ut ng mn~ Safety.
Added:
09-13-73 (Oral. 348.1Z019
A~ended Effectt re:
01-20-77 (Ord. 348.1540 )
06-27-78 (Ord. 348.165B)
0g-25-80 (Ord. 348.1855)
07-16-85 (Oral. 348.2495 )
SECTION 19.7. TENPORARY POLITICAL SIGNS.
For the purpose of this ordinance, a temporary political sign shall
mean a sign, not otherwise permitted by this ordinance, which
encourages a particjlar vote in a Scheduled election.
NotwithStanding any other provision Of this ordinance, temporary
political signs are permitte~ in all zoning classifications subject t;
the following limitations:
1. NO such sign shall exceed 16 square feet in surface area. -.
2. No free-stand, n) tenporary political sign shall exceed 5 feet
height.
). No lot.shall contain tmporary political signs having an aggregate
surface area in excess of 8D square feet.
4. No Such Sign shall be artificially lighted.
5. NO SuCh Sign shall be erected or placed more than 90 ~ays prior to
the SCheduled election to which it pertains.
6. All such' signs shall be removed within 10 days after the scheclule=
election to which they pertain, except that a sign erecte~ or
placed for' a candidate who prevails in a primary election may be
maintained until 10 days after the final election.
7, No such sign shall be erected, placed or maintained upon any
private property without the consent of the owner, lessee, or
person in lawful possession of such property.
8. NO temporary political sign shall be erected, placed, or maintaine~
on any publicly owned tree or shrub or upon the improved portion of
any street or highway right of way which is used for traffic or
parks ng.
9. NO temporary political sign shall be erected, placed or maintained
so that it cloes any of the following:
(a) HErs, Oafaces, disfigures or cl~ages any public builain;,
structure or other property.
(b) Endangers the safety of persons or property.
255
{c} Obscures the view of any fire hydrant, traffic sign, traf,i:
Signal° street sign, Or public informational sign.
(d) Blocks motorists' lines of sight to areas of vehicular or
pedestri an traffic.
Any tanporary political sign erected, placed or maintained in
violation of any provisions of this section may be rsnoved by the
County S c~ays after notice of tj~e violation is given to the concerne.'
candidate or sportsotto and to the owner, lessee or person in lawful
possession of the property. Any tenporary political sign which
constitutes an immediate danger to the safety or persons Or property,
or which has not been removed within 10 days after the schecSule~
election as provided in subsection (b}(6}, may be r~noved by the
County summarily and witl~out notice. The County may bring as action
to recover tj~e reasona)le cost of sign re, oval under this subsceil on.
Added Effecti re:
04-21-83 (Ord. 34t.2126)
256
ATTACIIM~ NO. 8
RESOLUTION
ATTACHMENT NO. 8
RESOLIYrlON NO. 92,-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING A FEE FOR THE
PROCESSING OF PERMITS FOR TEMPORARY SIGNS
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance 92- regulating the use of
Temporary Signs; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to establish a fee which does not exceed
the cost of processing temporary sign permits; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that $20.00 is a fee that does not exceed the cost
of issuing permits for temporary signs.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEh4ECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City of Temecula hereby adopts $20 as its fee for the issuance of
Temporary Sign Permits.
Section 2. This Resolution shall go into effect concurren~y with the effective date of
Ordinance 92- , entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 348 PERTAINING TO THE
REGULATION OF TEMPORARY SIGNS".
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, this day 1 lth day of August, 1992.
PATRICIA H. BIRDSALL
MAYOR
ATFEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
SXS~CO~aXTa~Si~.~ 24
ITEM
NO.
19
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL:
CITY Ol~ TEMBCULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Anthony Blmo, Chief BuffdinS Official
August 11, 1992
Consideration of l~inal Listing of Potentially Hazardous Buildings
RECOMM~-NDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council continue the public hearing to the meeting of Tuesday,
September 22, 1992, at 7:00 p.m.
BACKGROUND:
On February 12, 1991, in accordance with California State Senate Bffi 547, the City Council
adopted Ordinance No. 91-04 which establishes a program for the mitigation of identified
potentially hazardous bu~dings within the City.
DISCUSSION:
In accordance with provisions of Ordinance No. 91-04, Building and Safety staff conducted a
survey of buildings within the City to identify those considered to be potentially hazardous. A
potentially hazardous building as defined by this ordinance is a building having at least one (1)
unreinforced masonry bearing wall. Staff has compiled a preliminary listing of potentially
hazardous buildings as a result of the survey. Only one (1) building was found to be potentially
hazardous. The listed building contains exterior bearing walls on four (4) sides, of single wythe
masonry construction. In addition, a wood structure has been added to the rear which could also
be adversely affected by failure of adjacent unreinforced masonry walls. In accordance with the
pwvisions of this ordinance, the building's owner has been notified of its designation as
potentially hazardous. Upon approval of the proposed fmal listing, the owner of this building
Agenda Report
August 11, 1992
Page 2
will be directed to have an engineering report prepared to evaluate the building's structund
ability to resist forces imposed by earthquakes. This report must then be submitted to ~e
Building Official within six (6) months of the date of the notice. If it is determined that
strucUmd modifications are necessary, the building owner must then submit a Letter of Intent,
indicating the owner's intentions for dealing with the potential hazards. The Building owner
may appeal the initial determination that the building is within the scope of these regulations.
Said appeal shall be fried no later than thirty (30) days from the service date of the order for
structural evaluation.
The Building Official has been in contact with the property owner who is an out of state
resident. The owner has expressed a desire in coming to Temecula to discuss the building and
her options as the building owner. That meeting has been scheduled for September 21, 1992.
The owner would then be available for a Public Hearing at the City Council meeting of
September 22, 1992.
FINAL LISTING OF POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS BUILDINGS
SITE OWNER
42049 Main Street Mrs. Lorraine L. Clark
Temecula, California 3042 W. Lena Way
A.P.N. 922-036-020 Tucson, Arizona 85741
Legal Description:
20 acres M/L in For Lot 4, Blk 27 and Lots 5 & 6
ITEM
20
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Department of Public Works
August 11, 1992
TemeculalMurrieta Transportation Committee
PREPARED BY:
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council provide direction to the Temecula/Murrieta Transportation Committee
regarding their specific mission.
BACKGROUND:
At the recent meetings of the Temecula/Murrieta Traffic Committee there have been on-going
discussions regarding the mission of the Committee. Several of the Committee members feel
that the Committee was formed solely for the purpose of investigating a suitable interchange
location. However, others feel that the interchange study has the highest priority and that
there are additional issues that the Committee should also focus on. Therefore, the
Committee would appreciate some additional direction regarding their mission. The following
is a chronology of the Committee's actions involving the Interchange Study. A list of
additional issues that the Committee could investigate is also included.
April 1992:
Request for Proposals prepared by Hank Mohle (City of Murrieta),
revised by Tim Serlet and Ben Minamide, and mailed to 11 firms.
May 1992:
Murrieta City Council appointed Joe Peery, Kevin Walsh and Ruthanne
Taylor Berger to the Joint Temecula/Murrieta Transportation Committee
(hereinafter, the "Committee"). The Temecula Council appointed Ron
Parks, Steve Ford and Ron Roberrs.
May 13, 1992:
Mandatory consultant pre-proposal meeting to discuss the Scope of
Work. The proposals are due May 22, 1992.
-1- pw02\agdrpt\92\081 l\jttransp.com 0730a
June 8, 1992:
Tim Serlet, Ben Minamide and Hank Mohle reviewed the five proposals
received to create a "short list."
PROPOSALS RECEIVED
J.F. Davidson & Associates, Temecula
Lohr & Associates, Temecula
DMJM, San Bernardino
R.B.F., Temecula
NBS/Lowry, Temecula
SHORT LIST
R.B.F., Temecula
NBS/Lowry, Temecula
June 30, 1992:
An organizational meeting was held with the Committee as appointed
by the respective City Councils. The Committee is composed of:
CITY OF TEMECULA
Ron Parks, Councilmember
Steve Ford, Planning Commissioner
Ron Roberts, Chairman, Traffic and
Transportation Commission
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public
Works/City Engineer
CITY OF MURRIETA
Joe Peery, Mayor Pro Tern
Kevin Walsh, Planning Commissioner
Ruthanne Taylor Berger, Transportation and
Traffic Commissioner
Ben N. Minamide, Director of Public
Works/City Engineer
Ron Parks was elected Chairperson and Ruthanne Taylor Berger as Vice
Chairman.
The Committee selected Ron Roberts and Ruthanne Taylor Berger to sit
with Tim Serlet and Ben Minamide on the interview panel for the
recommended selection of the I-15 Interchange Study consultant.
A general discussion revealed the Committee would like to investigate
the following issues (the issues were not prioritized with the exception
of the Interchange Study having the highest priority):
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Interchange Study
Truck Traffic
Western Corridor
Alternative Modes of Transportation
Joint Applications for State/Federal Transportation Funds
TDM/'I'SM Programs
General Plan Consultant Coordination
Road to the Sea
Joint input to the County on Development Proposal in
unincorporated areas that affect the Cities.
Light Rail
-2- pwO2\agdrpt~92~0811 ~jttransp.com O730e
July 10, 1992:
July 13, 1992:
July 29, 1992:
The list will be presented to the City Councils for establishment of
priorities.
The Committee also felt that Murrieta should pursue becoming a
member of the Joint Powers Agreement with the Riverside Transit
Agency.
The Consultant Selection Subcommittee met to interview RBF of
Temecula and NBS/Lowry of Temecula. It was unanimously decided by
the Subcommittee to recommend selection of NBS/Lowry due to their
presentation, personnel involvement, background and experience.
The Committee met to hear a summary presentation by NBS/Lowry of
its qualifications and its work plan for the Initial Study. The Committee
ratified selection of NBS/Lowry. The consultant will start on the Initial
Study based on good faith.
It was decided that a 3-party professional agreement will be drafted by
Temecula for the formal presentation of award to NBS/Lowry. It is
anticipated to be on the Agendas of the City Councils as follows:
Murrieta - August 4; Temecula - August 11.
The Temecula/Murrieta Transportation Committee Meeting was held on
July 29, 1992 at 5:00 p.m. in the Temecula City Hall Main Conference
Room. A status report from NBS/Lowry on the Initial Study was
discussed.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
-3- pw02\agdrpt\92~0811 ~jttransp.com 0730a
ITEM NO.
21
ITEM NO.
22
APPROVAL R~~~-~
CITY ATTORNEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
City Clerk
August 11, 1992
Item No. 24 - Appointment to Parks and Recreation Commission
BACKGROUND: The staff will finalize a staff report on this item and forward
it to you under separate cover.
SWj
ITEM
NO.
23
APPROVAL R~~
CITY ATTORNEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT.'
CITY OF TEMECULA
A GENDA REPORT
City Council
David F. Dixon, City Manager~
August 11, 1992
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PRESENTATiON
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file.
DISCUSSION:
FISCAL IMPACT..
This Agenda Item will be a verbal presentation by the City
Manager to the City Council; therefore, no Staff Report
discussion is provided.
None.
A TTA CHMEN T.'
Copy of the overhead transparencies that will be used in
conjunction with the verbal presentation by the City
Manager.
Z
r~
Z
Z
~Z
I I I I
0
uj
I I I I
Z
0
!
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
Z
Z
Z
Z~
ZZ
Z~
0
~ Z
0
~0
~ ~0
O~ ~ ~
~ ~0
OZ;
0
O~
I I I
I I I
Z
Z
~ Z
N
o
LU
!--
LU
7O
¢:~LU
LUw
Om
>0
Zw
LUcc
LU
LU
~ ~'~
oz~o
-oco
0
0
,,)
a -,o
_
--~oz
~z 0 ~ w~ _mo
z o .s ·
I ~ I I
Z
Z
~T.~Z
Z
Z
~U
Z
O~
~0
Z
~ 0
Z~
Z~
u ~
o Z<
Z
I I I I I I
Z
Z
~ z
Z
0
0
~~ O~ ~Z
r~ i i i
Z
Z
~m
Z
~Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
~Z
~8
Z
r~Z
~m
Z
~Z
Z
m
~mZ~
ZmZ~
Z~Z
m Z
ITEM NO.
24
APPROVAT.
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM: City Attorney
DATE:
August 11, 1992
SUBJECT:
Approval of Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Paloma Del Sol
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the attached Amended
Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") regarding Paloma del Sol.
DISCUSSION: Last January, the Council approved a MOU with Bedford
addressing Quimby and Development Impact Fees for Paloma del Sol. A copy of the earlier
Staff Report and MOU is attached. The material changes from the earlier MOU are as follows:
1. The original MOU provided that Bedford would dedicate to the City two parks:
one was 7.44 acres located in Tract 24186-4 (Lot 1 ); the other was 7.74 acres located in
Tract 24133-2 (Lot 114). These parks were to have "active" improvements (i.e., ballfields
with lighting, restrooms, and parking.)
However, subsequently, the Homeowners Association in Paloma del Sol
objected to the second 7.74 acre park.
Consequently, Bedford has proposed amending the MOU to substitute an 8
acre, active park in Planning Area 6, in lieu of the City, but it would only be developed as a
"passive" park. The addition of the 8-acre park will require an amendment to the Specific
Plan.
2. The Specific Plan for Paloma del Sol indicates that 590 units are allowed in
Planning Area 6, with a target density of 15.6 du/ac. Despite the addition of an 8-acre park
into Planning Area 6, Bedford will still seek to retain the 590 units, albeit at the higher target
density of 19.8 du/ac. This potential issue will be resolved in the Specific Plan Amendment.
3. The other significant change in the Amended MOU is that the earlier MOU
provided up to a $1 Million credit for each of the active parks against future impact fees. The
credit is based upon the cost of the improvements. The Amendment permits up to a $2
Million credit for the two active parks jointly.
agdrpt/081192 -1 -
Agenda Report
MOU - Palarea Del Sol
Page Two
It is recommended that the Council approve the Amended MOU.
FISCAL IMPACT:
· Up to $2 Million Dollars in Development Fees credited to Bedford
· Potential to increase Impact Fees to City from $2,600/unit under County
Development Agreement to $3,000/unit, but offsetting reduction from
combined City/County fee of $4,700/unit
· Potential liability to county of one half of $2,100/unit
ATTACHMENTS:
1.
Amended MOU with Map showing location of "active" parks and MOU and
Amended MOU
Staff Report to original MOU
Original MOU
egdrpt/081192 -2-
RESTA~ AND AMI~-NDMENT OF
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN
CITY OF TEMECULA
and
BEDFORD DEVEL0~ COMPANY '
and
MESA HOMES
(Park Fees)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
INDEX
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
Pa_~e
Amend Development. AEreement ............................. 4
Eastside Tract Maps .................................... 5
Cost of Litigation ...................................... 5
Public Facilities Fees Shortfall .............................. 6
Reimbursement of Fees ................................... 6
Parks, Greenbelts and Paseos ............................... 6
Main Recreation Areas ................................... 7
Remaining Open Space Areas ............................... 8
Timing of Park Impwvements and Transfer to City .................. 8
Fee Credits .......................................... 9
Standstill Agreement .................................... 9
Park Fee Obligation ..................................... 10
Jurisdiction and Attorneys' Fees ............................. 10
Severability .......................................... 10
Entire Agreement ...................................... 10
Construction ......................................... 10
Amendment of Agreement ................................. 11
Time of the Essence .................................... 11
NoPrecommitment ..................................... 11
Pay Under Protest ...................................... 11
Superseding ......................................... 11
Counterparts ......................................... 12
~ITS
MAP OF PARKS, PASEOS, GREENBELTS
07-30-9'Z 1Z~21 -OOO&9
G:'~DOC%.lSZ'~9'ZO1OOZG.NO6 ~
RESTA~ AND AMF-NDMENT OF
M'F, MORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
(Quimby Park Fees)
This Restatement and Amendment of Memorandum of Understanding
('MOU') is entered into by and between the City of Temecula ('City') and Bedford
Development Company and Mesa Homes (collectively 'Bedford') to be effective on August
11, 1992, with reference to the following:
RtiC!TAL~
A. City and Bedford have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding
effective January 31, 1992. City and Bedford wish to restate and amend the Memorandum
of Understanding to modify certain provisions due to changed circumstances.
B. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65864, et se~_.
('Development Agreement Statutes'), Bedford and the County of Riverside ('County')
entered into Development Agreement No. 4 recorded in the Official Records of Riverside
County on November 7, 1988, as Instrument No. 325513 ('Development Agreement').
C. The Development Agreement encompasses a project formerly located
within County approved Specific Plan No. 219 ('Specific Plan*) known as 'Paloma del
Sol", a mixed use subdivision project to be developed on property owned by Bedford which
became a pan of the municipal boundaries of the City when the City incorporated on
December 1, 1989.
D. Pursuant to the provisions of the Development Agreement Statutes, the
City became the successor-in-interest to the County under the Development Agreement upon
incorporation of the City.
E. A dispute has arisen between the City and Bedford over the amount of
fees or land dedication for park or recreational purposes Bedford is required to provide to
City as allowed under Section 66477 of the California Government Code ("Quimby Park
Fees").
07-30-9'Z l:ZZ21 -OQ(09
G:'~IXIC%lSZ%9'ZQ1QQZG.IIOd.
F. On May 20, 1987, the County amended Ordinance No. 460 authorizing
the imposition of Quimby Park Fees. Ordinance No. 460 required adoption of an
implementation resolution designating a recipient of the Quimby Park Fees. On June 28,
1988, pursuant to Resolution No. 88-218, the County designated CSA 143 as the recipient
of Quimby Park Fees subject to the adoption of a master plan. On June 27, 1989, pursuant
to Resolution No. 89-331, the County adopted a master plan for CSA 143, establishing the
Quimby Park Fees at three (3) acres per 1,000 new residents ('County Park Fee Standard").
G. Pursuant to Resolution No. 99-53, adopted on May 8, 1990, City has
adopted Quimby Park Fees of five (5) acres of land for parks and recreational purposes, or
payment of fees in lieu thereof, for every 1,000 people to reside in the proposed subdivision
("City Park Fee Standard*).
H. The City interprets the Development Agreement to permit the
imposition of increased Quimby Park Fees computed on the City Park Fee Standard and has
required Bexlford to pay Quimby Park Fees based on the City Park Fee Standard as a
condition of issuance of building permits for Paloma del SoL Bedford disagrees with this
position and interprets the provisions of the Development Agreement to limit the City's
authority to impose Quimby Park Fees based on the park and open space requirements of the
Specific Plan as approved by the County and incorporated into the Development Agreement.
I. In order to avoid a legal challenge to the Quimby Park Fees and to
prevent the running of any relevant statutes of limitation while attempts are being made to
resolve this dispute, Bedford and City have entered into a Standstill Agreement effective on
April 9, 1991, as amended ('Standstill Agreement*).
J. City and Bedford acknowledge that development of Paloma del Sol will
result in a generation of significant municipal revenue, public infrastructure facilities and the
enhancement of the quality of life, including recreation facilities for present and future
residents of the City. The benefits to the City and Bedford contemplated by Paloma del Sol
include:
(1)
the opportunity for a high quality residential-commercial
project creating significant job opportunities, sales tax
and ad valorera tax revenues for the City;
07-30-92 TZE1-00069
G:%DQC%152Xg'ZOlOO26.N06
(2)
payment of substantial impact fees to be used to solve City and
regional traffic infrastructure demands;
(3) a payment of public facilities fees;
participation in special assessment and/or community facilities
districts to finance City and regional infrastructure
improvements;
(5)
the creation of significant park, recreation and open space
dedications for public use and the protection of significant
natural resources.
K. It is contemplated that the Specific Plan will be amended (Amendment
No. 3) to: (i) add an 8+ acre neighborhood park at the southeast comer of De Portola
Road and "H" Street; (ii) change the target density for Planning Area 6 up to 19.8 du/ac;
and (iii) clarify the intent of the Specific Plan to be consistent with the terms and conditions
of the approved vesting tentative map for Paloma del Sol.
L. The new 8 + acre park to be dedicated by Bedford to the City is
located in Planning Area 6 of the Specific Plan. Planning Area 6 pwvides for development
of 37.8 acres with Very High density residential use at a maximum total of 590 dwelling
units. At such time as the Specific Plan is amended to delineate the 8 + acre park, the
remainder of Planning Area 6 will be reduced to 29.8 acres. Thereafter, development of
Planning Area 6 up to the maximum number of 590 residential dwelling units will fall
within the allowable Density Range of 14-20 du/ac of the Specific Plan but not within the
target density of 15.6 du/ac unless the target density for Planning Area 6 is amended to 19.8
du/ac as part of Specific Plan Amendment No. 3.
M. The City and Bedford acknowledge that due to the present economic
recession, none of these benefits to the City are possible unless the Paloma del Sol project
proceeds with development. The parties further acknowledge and agree that the present
structure of fees and private recreation and open space requirements creates substantial
impediments to development of Paloma del Sol.
N. Without admitting or determining any rights or obligations as between
City and Bedford, each to the other, with respect to the amount of the Quimby Park Fees,
and solely to avoid the potential expense and inconvenience of protncted litigation, and to
balance the needs of the City to provide adequate parks and recreational facilities with the
difficulty of land development in today's economy, City and Bedford agree to settle this
matter based on the terms and conditions of this MOU.
1. Amend Development Agreement. In accordance with the procedures
set forth in the Development Agreement Statutes, City and Bedford shall commence the
necessary proceedings to consider amending the Development Agreement to:
eliminate the County Public Facilities and Services Mitigation
Fee and replace it with a City Public Facilities Fee;
provide that for a period of two (2) years from the date of
recording the amendment to the Development Agreement, the
City Public Facilities Fee shall be paid in lieu of the Regional
Statistical Area Fee (*RSA Fee") established by County
Ordinance No. 659 adopted by the City and in lieu of the
County Public Facilities Fee set forth in the Development
Agreement;
provide that for a period of two (2) years from the date of
recording the amendment to the Development Agreement, the
City Public Facilities Fee shall be Three Thousand Dollars
($3,000.00) per each residential unit (*Interim Public Facilities
Fee~ as applied to the development of Paloma del Sol whether
constructed by Bedford or any other merchant builder
purchasing Paloma del Sol tracts from Bedford. Bedford shall
pay K-Rat, fire, traffic signal and drainage mitigation fees;
07-)0-9'Z I~'~1-00069
G:%.I)OC%IS2\gZOlOO26.N06 4
pwvide that after said two year period the mount of the
Interim Public Facilities Fee shall be increased up to the amount
of the City's Public Facilities Fee imposed on all projects in the
City at that time. In the event the City has not adopted a City
Public Facility Fee by the end of said two year period, Bedford
shall continue to pay the Interim Public Facilities Fee until such
time as the City adopts a City Public Facilities Fee;
provide that Bedford will be subject to paying a City Public
Facilities Fee for non-residential development in the Paloma del
Sol project in accordance with the provisions of the City's non-
residential Public Facilities Fee ordinance. In the event the
City has not adopted a Public Facilities Fee for non-residential
development at the time of issuance of building permits for
commercial construction, Bedford agrees to abide by the City's
procedures relating to payment of future non-residential Public
Facilities Fees applicable to all projects in the City in effect at
that time; and
provide that the park land and recreation facilities to be
dedicated to the City as contemplated by this MOU shall fully
satisfy Bedford's obligation to pay Quimby Park Fees and to
provide parks and recreational facilities for the Paloma del Sol
project consistent with the Specific Plan and this MOU.
2. F-~.~tside Tract Maps. City shall cooperate in commencing the
necessary proceedings in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act to mend the Paloma del
Sol 'Eastside' Tentative Tract Maps Nos. 24182, 24184, 24185, 24186, 24187 and 24188
with no new conditions inconsistent with the terms of the Specific Plan as may be mended
and this MOU, including the 8-Acre Park described in Section 7(a) of this MOU. Neither
party waives its rights as to what constitutes 'consistency* with the Specific Plan.
3. Cost of Liti~,ation. In the event the County seeks to challenge the right
of City and Bedford to enter into this MOU or to mend the Development Agreement and
institutes an action, suit or proceeding to challenge this MOU or invalidate and/or enjoin the
07-:30-9'Z 1~Z~1 -O00&,9
G:%,IX)C%152%9"~O10O~.IiM ~
enforcement of this MOU or the amendment to the Development Agreement or take such
other action(s) which result in unreasonable delays in the development of the PaJoma de1 Sol
project, the parties agree to cooperate and participate in a joint defense in any action against
the parties, their officers, agents and employees, from any and all such obligations, liability,
suit, claim, loss, judgment, Hen, resulting from such action(s) brought by County (but
excluding actions to expunge any lis pendens) and to share equally the costs associated with
attorneys' fees, costs and damages that the parties may incur as a result of any such actions
or lawsuit to challenge City and/or Bedford's legal authority to enter into this MOU and/or
amend the Development Agreement. In the event the County prevails in any such litigation
after exhaustion of any procedural appeals, the provisions relating to the payment of Interim
Public Facilities Fees as set forth in this MOU and/or the amendment to the Development
Agreement shall terminate.
4. Public Facilities Fees Shortf=!l. In the event the County prevails in
any legal action or other proceeding to challenge, set aside, or enjoin the enforcement of the
amendment to the Development Agreement and a court or other tribunal having jurisdiction
over the matter after all appeals are taken, determines that Bedford and/or the City is liable
to make up any shortfall in the amount of the Public Facilities and Services Mitigation fees
owned by City and/or Bedford to County, then City and Bedford shall each share equally in
paying any such shortfall.
5. Reimbursement of Fees. If prior to the amendment to the
Development Agreement and in the event Bedford is required to pay public facilities fees
and/or RSA fees in an amount greater than the amount set forth in the amendment to the
Development Agreement, Bedford shall be entitled to reimbursement of the difference in the
amount of the fees paid within thirty (30) days of the date of recordafion of the Amendment
to the Development Agreement.
6. psrk~. Greenbelts and Paseos. As additional consideration for entering
into this MOU, Bedford agrees to dedicate to the City, or cause to be dedicated, and City
agrees to accept when offered, park land, greenbelts, slopes and paseos equalling
approximately 166.5 acres. Bedford and the Paloma del Sol Association ("Association")
may also dedicate approximately 27.5 acres of park land and paseos to the City. The park
land, greenbelts, slopes and paseos are described on Exhibit A which is attached and made a
pan hereof and incorporated by this reference.
07-30-~r2 12221-0(x~9
· :~DOC~152~201002S,NO(~ 6
7. Main Recreation Areas. The six main recreation areas and the tens
for dedication to the City are described as follows:
(a) An eight-acre park located in Specific Plan Planning Area No.
6 and within Tentative TraCt 25417 (8-Acre Park) will be improved with two baseball
diamonds/soccer field combination with fights, restroom and concession building, group
picnic area, drinking fountains, trash receptacles, parking lot.
(b) A seven and seventy-four hundredths (7.74) acre park located in
Tract 24133-2, Lot 114 ("7.74 Acre Park') will be improved as a 'passive park" and may
be dedicated to the City in Bedford's sole discretion sometime in the future.
(c) A thirteen and eighty-four hundredths (13.84) acre paseo park
located in Tract 24133-3, Lot 106 ("13.84 Acre Paseo Park") currently improved with tot
lots, basketball courts, tennis court, picnic areas with tables and barbecues,
walkways/bikeways with lighting and may be dedicated to the City at sometime in the future
at Bedford's discretion and after receiving the prior consent of at least a majority of the
members of the Association.
(d) An approximate five and nine tenths (5.9) acre paseo park
located in Tract 24134-3, Lots 68, 69, 70, 71 and a portion of Lot 83 of Tract 24134-F
("5.9 Acre Paseo Park') currently improved with a tot lot, basketball court, picnic areas
with tables and barbecue, wallcways/bikeways with lighting. This park is owned by the
Association and may at the discretion of the Association be dedicated to the City sometime
in the future.
(e) A seven and forty-four hundredths (7.44) acre park located in
the Eastside (future) Tract 24186-4, Lot 1 ("7.44 Acre Park") planned to be improved with
a combination soccer/baseball field with lights, restrooms and concession building, group
picnic area, drinking fountains, trash receptacles, parking lot.
(0 A nine and thirty-five hundredths (9.35) acre paseo park located
in the Eastside (future) Tracts including: Lots 159 and 160 of (future) Tract 24186-1; Lots
121 and 129 of (future) Tract 24186-2 and Lot 121 of (future) Tract 24187-F ("9.35 Acre
07-30-92 12221 -(XX)69
G: M)OC%152%92010026 .NO6 7
Paseo Park") planned to be improved with a basketball court, tot lot, picnic area,
walkway/bikeways with lighting landscaping and irrigation.
8. Remainine' Open Space Areas.
(a) The remaining recreation and open space areas consist of 142
acres of greenbelt paseos, roadway paseos, public parkway and slope landscaping, both east
and west sides of Paloma del Sol.
Co) Those perimeter and interior greenbelt paseos, roadway pas~os,
parks and slopes shown on Exhibit A which are transferred to the City will be maintained by
the Temecula Community Services District CTCSD"). All assessments for maintenance
shall be in compliance with the standards and formulas imposed by the TCSD on a city-
wide basis.
9. Timing of Park Improvements and Trnnsfer to City.
(a) The 8-Acre Park shall be fully improved
and transferred to the City as soon as December 31, 1992, but no hter than March 31,
1993. Additional street improvements to De Portoh and construction of Campanula Way
adjacent to the 8-Acre park will be completed as development of the adjoining tracts occurs,
but not later than five (5) years from the date of the amendment of the Development
Agreement.
Co) Improvement to the 7. ~,4-Acre Park shall commence at the time
of development of the adjoining tracts firact Nos. 24186-1, 2, 3, 4 and Final).
Improvements to the 9.35-Acre Paseo Park shall commence at the time of development of
the adjoining tracts (Tract Nos. 24186-1, 2 and Final). Improvements to the 7.44 Acre Park
and the 9.35-Acre Paseo Park shall be completed on or before the issuance of 50% of the
certificates of occupancy for the dwelling units constructed in the adjoining tracts. Both of
these parks shall be wansferred to the City in accordance with the current TCSD funding
procedures and practices.
(c) Improvement to and transfer of the remaining 142 acres of
greenbelt paseos, wadway paseos, public parkway and slope landscaping, both l=a~t and
07-3o-9a 1~'1-00069
G:M)OC%lSZ%9'ZOlOI)7.A.NI)6 ~
West sides of Paloma del Sol shall occur with the completion of development of the
adjoining tracts and in accordance with the current TCSD funding procedures and practices.
(d) Bedford may extend the improvement completion and park
transfer dates as set forth in this MOU with written consent from the City.
(e) City shall receive and approve all park and recreation facilities
improvement plans in accordance with the City's park standards, procedures and
specifications except the City shall accept without any modifications to the improvements to
the 13.84-Acre Paseo Park and the 5.9-Acre Paseo Park as currently constructed and
installed provided these parks are transferred to the City.
(f) The appwximately 194 acres of parks, greenbelts and paseos
shall be transferred to the City by grant deeds from Bedford and the Association, depending
on ownership. City agrees to accept the parks and any improvements within a reasonable
time of being offered for dedication. The City shall be responsible for establishing any
maintenance obligations with the TCSD associated with the parks, paseos and greenbelt
areas described in this MOU.
10. Fee Credits. At the time of completion of the improvements and
transfer of each of the public parks as provided in this MOU, Bedford shall receive a credit
against payment of future City Public Facilities Fees based on the actual improvement cost
incurred by Bedford for each of said public parks up to a maximum credit of Two Million
Dollars ($2,000,000). City shall have a right to review, audit and verify all costs associated
with said park improvements under procedures to be mutually agreed upon between the
11. Standstill Agreement. Until the Development Agreement is mended
as contemplated by this MOU, the Standstill Agreement shall govern the rights and
obligations of the parties with regards to Quimby Park Fees associated with the Paloma
Sol project, except that it shall be amended to remain in full force and effect unffi a
certificate of occupancy is issued by the City for the 500th residential dwelling unit in the
Paloma del Sol project.
12221 -IX)069
G:%JmL"~152\92010026.NO6 9
12. Park Fee Obligation. Upon execution of this MOU by the parties,
regardless of undue delays or the outcome of any lawsuit or action brought by County or
terms of settlement of any action or proceeding which may be instituted by the County
against City and/or Bedford relating to this MOU or the amendment to the Development
Agreement, Bedford's Quimby Park Fee obligation for the Paloma de1 Sol project shall be
satisfied based on the requirements provided in Sections 6, 7 and 8 of this MOU excluding
Tract 24183 which currently satisfies the City Park Fee Standard. Bedford's Quimby Park
Fee obligation with regard to Planning Area 6, as shown on Exhibit A, up to the maximum
number of 590 attached residential units permitted by the Specific Plan Density Range shall
also be satisfied.
13. Jurisdiction and Attorneys' Fees. This MOU is made and entered into
in the State of California, and this MOU, and any rights, remedies, or obligations provided
for herein shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of
California.
14. Severability. If any portion, provision or pan of this MOU is held,
determined, or adjudicated to be invalid, unenforceable, or void for any reason whatsoever,
each such portion, provision, or part shall be severed from the remaining portions,
provisions, or parts of this MOU and shall not affect the validity or enforceability of such
remaining portions, provisions, or parts.
15. Entire Al~reement. This MOU contains the entire understanding and
agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the matten referred to herein. No
other representations, covenants, undertakings or other prior to contemporaneous
agreements, oral or written, respecting such matters, which are not specifically incorporated
herein, shall be deemed in any way to exist or bind any of the parties hereto. The parties
hereto acknowledge that each party has not executed this MOU in reliance on any such
promise, representation, or warranty.
16. Construction. This MOU shall not be construed against the party
preparing it, but shall be construed as if both parties jointly prepared this MOU and any
uncertainty and ambiguity shall not be interpreted against any one party.
07-)0-92 12221 -O0049
G:~cxlsaxr~nmas.~ l0
17. Amendment of Arreement. This MOU shall not be modified by either
party by oral representation made before or after the execution of this MOU. All
modifications must be in writing and signed by the parties, and each of them.
18. Time of the Essence. Time is of the essence for the performance of
each and every covenants and the satisfaction of each and every condition contained in this
MOU.
19. No Precommitment. City and Bedford understand and agree that
certain actions of the City contemplated by this MOU will require compliance with legal
procedures regulations and public hearings accompanied by discretionary decisions. The
parties acknowledge that nothing contained in this MOU shall be construed as a
precommitment or requiring the City Planning Commission or City Council to approve any
discretionary actions contemplated by this MOU.
20. Pay Under Protest. This will acknowledge that as agreed to in the
January 31, 1992 MOU, Bedford has withdrawn its notices of payment of permit fees under
protest and terminated the Standstill Agreement relating to said fees.
21. Supersedint,. This MOU shall supersede, amend, and restate the
Memorandum of Understanding effective January 31, 1992, and shall control the rights,
duties and obligations of the parties as to the subject matter of this MOU.
07-~1)-9~
G:MX)CXlSZXg'ZO10026.N06 11
22. Counterparts. This MOU may be exex:uted in any number of
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original.
ATTEST:
CITY OF TEMECULA
June Greek, City Clerk
Patrich H. Birdsall, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BEDFORD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY,
a California corporation
By:
Scott Field, City Attorney
By:
MESA HOMES,
a California corporation
By:
12221
G:'~DOC%lSa\9201OQZS.NO6 12
EXHIBIT "A"
MAP OF PARKS. PASEOS. GRI::.I:.NBELTS
Q"/-30-92 1'}"~1 -IX)Q&9
G:%DOC'%lSZ%qj~ZQ1QQZd,.NQ6
APPROVAl
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER '~4~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Mayor and City Council
David F. Dixon, City Manager
February 25, 1992
Approval of Memorandum of Understanding Regarding
Palarea Del Sol
PREPARED BY:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the attached Memorandum
of Understanding (MOU) regarding Palarea del Sol.
DISCUSSION:
1. Beckaround
The County approved a Specific Plan and Development Agreement for Paloma del
Sol in 1988, without providing for Quimby fees. The County Quimby Fee
ordinance was not adopted until 1989.
Typically, once a subdivision is approved without Quimby Fees, it is not subject to
any later ordinance imposing the Fees. However, because the Development
Agreements for Paloma del Sol authorized collection of subsequently adopted
development fees and exactions, it is our opinion that Quimby Fees may be
collected on these developments. Bedford disputes this contention, claiming, in
part, that it has already met its Quimby Fee requirements through private parkland
required under the Specific Plan.
The Palarea del Sol Development Agreement also established impact fees of
approximately $4,700/dwelling unit. It further states that even after Incorporation,
the County would receive $2,1 00/unit, leaving the City approximately $2,600. It
is the City Attorney's opinion, however, that the City is entitled to the full amount
of the fee as successor in interest to the County under the Agreement.
2. MOU
In brief, the MOU directs that, subject to public hearing and Planning Commission
and City Council approval, the Development Agreement be amended as follows:
a. Residential Imo~ct Fees. The City will agree to a cap on fees to
$3,000 per residential unit for two years, after which time the fees will increase to
the then, current City rate. Fire, library, K-Rat and traffic signal mitigation fees will
also be assessed at their current rate for each residential unit.
All fees will be paid to the City. Should the County sue, the City and
Bedford will share equally the cost of defense and any resulting liability.
b. Parkland. No additional Quimby Fees will be assessed, even if the
County should successfully sue over impact fees. Instead, Bedford will dedicate
parkland to the City equaling approximately 65 acres. These 65 acres (which does
not include parks required under recent map approvals) are made up of the
following five major recreation areas as well as smaller internal greenbelt paseos:
(1) One 9-acre park which will consist of two baseball
diamonds/soccer field combination with lights, restroom and concession
building, group picnic area, drinking fountains, trash receptacles, parking lot
etc, improved at the cost of $1,000,000.
{2) One Paseo Park of 11.5 acres, to consist of tot lots, basketball
courts, tennis court, volleyball court, picnic area with tables and barbecues,
walkways/bikeways with lighting, at the cost of $1,800,000.
(3) One Paseo Park of 5 acres, to consist of tot lot, basketball
court, picnic areas with tables and barbecue, walkways/bikeways with
lighting, at the cost of $550,000.
(4) One 7-acre park to consist of combination soccer/baseball field
with lights, restroom and concession building, group picnic area, drinking
fountains, trash receptacles, parking lot, etc,, at the cost of $1,000,000.
(5) One Paseo Park of 4.5 acres, consists of basketball court, tot
lot, volleyball court, picnic areas, walkways/bikeways with lighting, at the
cost of $550,000.
The remaining greenbelt paseos, both East and West side of the
Project, will cost approximately ~3,300,000 to develop with additional tot lots,
basketball courts, walkways, lights, Landscaping, irrigation, etc. All perimeter
greenbelts would be maintained by the TCSD. All areas will be improved by
Bedford, except for the first and fourth parks listed, which the City will credit
Bedford's fee in the amount of $1,000,000 per park. These will be the only parks
generally accessible to the public.
It should be noted that by taking this parkland out of the Homeowners
Association (HOA') and into the TCSD, the marketability of the Project will greatly
improve, because the HOA dues will decrease substantially.
c. Fngineering Fees Protest. Bedford previously protested over $2.2
Million in engineering plan check fees. Bedford will waive this protest.
d. Commercial ImDac{ Fees. The MOU will preserve the City's option to
assess commercial impact fees on projects built prior to the time the fees are
established.
e. Fastside Tract Maos. The City will have the right to add conditions to
the tract maps not inconsistent with the Specific Plan.
The principal benefits and burdens of the MOU are as follows:
Benefits Burdens
City receives $3,000/unit,
rather than $2,600 under
the old County Agreement,
and there are no additional
County impact fees burdening
development
· should County prevail in
litigation and the Court
requires fees of $2,100/unit
to be paid to County, City
will be precluded from seek-
ing additional Quimby Fees
by amending agreement, City
improves its position should
the County sue to recover fees
· City shares costs of defense
and judgment with Bedford
should County sue
the marketability of the project
improves, resulting in payment of
impact fees
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Memorandum of Understanding for Paloma del Sol
MEMORANDUM OF UNDOSTANDING
( Quimby Park Fees )
This Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") is entered
into by and between the City of Temecula ("City") and Bedford
Development Company and Mesa Homes (collectively "Bedford") to be
effective on January 31, 1992, with reference to the following:
RECITALI
A. Pursuant to California Government Code Section
65864, ~t sou. ("Development Agreement Statutes"), Bedford and
the County of Riverside ("County") entered into Development
Agreement No. 4 recorded in the Official Records of Riverside
County on November 7, 1988, as Instrument No. 325513
("Development Agreement").
B. The Development Agreement encompasses a project
formerly located within County approved Specific Plan No. 219
known as "Paloma Del Sol", a mixed use subdivision project to be
developed on property owned by Bedford which became a part of the
municipal boundaries of the City when the City incorporated on
December 1, 1989.
C. Pursuant to the provisions of the Development
Agreement Statutes, the City became the successor-in-interest to
the County under the Development Agreement upon incorporation of
the City.
D. A dispute has arisen between the City and Bedford
over the amount of fees or land dedication for park or
recreational purposes Bedford is required to provide to City as
allowed under Section 66477 of the California Government Code
("Quimby Park Fees").
01-30-9Z t~221 -OOO~9
G:~(]CVS~P~,9'~QIQQ26.NQ~.
E. On May 20, 1987, the County amended Ordinance
No. 460 authorizing the imposition of Quimby Park Fees.
Ordinance No. 460 required adoption of an implementation
resolution designating a recipient of the Quimby Park Fees. On
June 28, 1988, pursuant to Resolution No. 88-218, the County
designated CSA 143 as the recipient of Quimby Park Fees subject
to the adoption of a master plan. On June 27, 1989, pursuant to
Resolution No. 89-331, the County adopted a master plan for
CSA 143, establishing the Quimby Park Fees at three (3) acres per
1,000 new residents ("County Park Fee Standard").
F. Pursuant to Resolution No. 99-53, adopted on May
8, 1990, City has adopted Quimby Park Fees of five (5) acres of
land for parks and recreational purposes, or payment of fees in
lieu thereof, for every 1,000 people to reside in the proposed
subdivision ("City Park Fee Standard").
G. The City interprets the Development Agreement to
permit the imposition of increased Quimby Park Fees computed on
the City Park Fee Standard. and has required Bedford to pay Quim~
Park Fees based on the City Park Fee Standard as a condition of
issuance of building permits for Paloma Del Sol. Bedford
disagrees with this position and interprets the provisions of the
Development Agreement to limit the City's authority to impose
Quimby Park Fees based on the park and open space requirements of
Specific Plan No. 219 as approved by the County and incorporated
into the Development Agreement.
H. In order to avoid a legal challenge to the Quimby
Park Fees and to prevent the running of any relevant statutes of
limitation while attempts are being made to resolve this dispute,
Bedford and City have entered into a Stands=ill Agreement
effective on April 9, 1991, as amended ("Standstill Agreement").
01-3Q-~ I~'J')l -QQQ4,9
G:~IXJC~,15~9ZQIQQZA.liQ~ 2
I. City and Bedford acknowledge that development of
Paloma Del Sol will result in a generation of significant
municipal revenue, public infrastructure facilities and the
enhancement of the quality of life, including recreation
facilities for present and future residents of the City. The
benefits to the City and Bedford contemplated by Paloma Del Sol
include:
the opportunity for a high quality
residential-commercial project creating
significant job opportunities, sales tax
and ad valorem tax revenues for the City
(2)
payment of substantial impact fees to be used
to solve City and regional traffic
infrastructure demands
(3) a payment of public facilities fees
(4)
participation in special assessment and/or
community facilities districts to finance
City and regional infrastructure improvements
(5)
the creation of significant park, recreation
and open space dedications for public use and
the-protection of significant natural
resources
The City and Bedford acknowledge that due to the present
recession, none of these benefits to the City are possible unless
the Paloma Del Sol project goes forward. The parties further
acknowledge and agree that the present structure of fees and
private recreation and open space creates substantial impediments
to development of Paloma Del Sol.
01 -)o-Ira 12221 -OOlM,9
G:%I)OC%15Z%gZO1002&.RO; 3
J. Without admitting or determining any rights or
obligations as between City and Bedford, each to the other, with
respect to the amuunt of the Quimby Park Fees, and solely to
avoid the potential expense and inconvenience of protracted
litigation, and to balance the needs of the City to provide
adequate parks and recreational facilities with the difficulty of
land development in today's economy, City and Bedford agree to
settle this.matter based on the terms and conditions of this
Memorandum of Understanding.
1. Amend Development Aareement. In accordance with
the procedures set forth in the Development Agreement Statutes,
City and Bedford shall commence the necessary proceedings to
consider amending the Development Agreement to:
eliminate the County Public Facilities and
Services Mitigation Fee and replace it with
City Public Facilities Fee;
provide that for a period of two (2) years
from the date of recording the amendment to
the Development Agreement, the City Public
Facilities Fee shall be paid in lieu of the
Regional Statistical Area Fee ("RSA Fee")
established by County Ordinance No. 659
adopted by the City;
provide that for a period of two (2) years
from the date of recording the amendment to
the Development Agreement, the City Public
Facilities Fee shall be Three Thousand
Dollars ($3,000.00) per each residential unit
("Interim Public Facilities Fee") exclusive
01-38-~Z 1;221 -O00&9
G:%IM)C%152%9'aOlOOZA.lIG; 4
of all other fees, including but no= limited
to K-Rat, fire, traffic signal, and drainage
mitigation fees as applied to the development
of Paloma Del Sol whether constructed by
Bedford or any other merchant builder
purchasing Paloma Del Sol tracts from
Bedford;
provide that after said two year period the
amount of the Interim Public Facilities Fee
shall be increased up to the amount of the
City~s Public Facilities Fee imposed on all
projects in the City at that time. In the
event the City has not adopted a City Public
Facility Fee by the end of said two year
period, Bedford shall continue to pay the
Interim Public Facilities Fee until such time
as the City adopts a City Public Facilities
Fee.
provide that Bedford will be subject to
paying a City Public Facilities Fee for non-
residential development in the Paloma Del Sol
project in accordance with the provisions of
the City's non-residential Public Facilities
Fee ordinance. In the event the City has not
adopted a Public Facilities Fee for non-
residential development at the time of
issuance of building permits for commercial
construction, Bedford agrees to abide by the
City's procedures relating to payment of
future non-residential Public Facilities Fees
applicable to all projects in the City in
effect at that time.
ol -3Q-e~ 12221
G:%DOC%15Z%eZQIQQZd..NQZ
provide that the park land and recreation
facilities to be dedicated to the City as
contemplated by this MOU shall fully satisfy
Bedfordes obligation to pay Quimby Park Fees
and to provide parks and recreational
facilities for the Paloma Del Sol project
consistent with Specific Plan No. 219 and
~his MOU.
2. ~asts~de Tract MapS. City shall commence the
necessary proceedings in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act
to extend the Paloma Del Sol "Eastside" Tentative Tract Maps Nos.
24182, 24184, 24185, 24186, 24187 and 24188 with no new
conditions inconsistent with the terms of Specific Plan No. 219
and this MOU. Neither par~y waives its rights as to what
constitutes "consistency" with Specific Plan No. 219.
3. Cost of T.itiaation. In the event the County seeks
to challenge the right of City and Bedford to enter into this MOU
or to amend the Development Agreement and institutes an action, ~
suit or proceeding to challenge this MOU or invalidate and/or
enjoin the enforcement of this MOU or the amendment to the
Development Agreement or take such other action(s) which result
in unreasonable delays in the development of the Paloma Del Sol
project, the parities agree to cooperate and participate in a
joint defense in any action against the parties, their officers,
agents and employees, from any and all such obligations,
liability, suit, claim, loss, judgment, lien, resulting from such
action(s) brought by County (but excluding actions to expunge any
lis pendens) and ~o share equally the costs associated with
attorneysg fees, costs and damages that the parties may incur as
a result of any such actions or lawsuit to challenge City and/or
Bedford~s legal authority to enter into this MOU and/or amend the
Development Agreement. In the event the County prevails in any
such litigation after exhaustion of any procedural appeals, the
ol -:so-Fz 1~1
G:,kmX'%ISZ%9'aQIQQ~S.NOZ 6
provisions relating to the payment of Interim Public Facilities
Fees as set forth in this MOU and/or ~he amendment
Development Agreement shall terminate.
4. Public Facilities Fees Shortfall. In the even=
the County prevails in any legal action or other proceeding
challenge, set aside, or enjoin the enforcement of the amendment
to the Development Agreement and a court or other tribunal having
jurisdiction over the matter after all appeals are taken,
de=ermines that Bedford and/or the City is liable to make up any
shortfall in the amount of the Public Facilities and Services
Mitigation fees owned by City and/or Bedford to County, then City
and Bedford shall each share equally in paying any such
shortfall.
5. Reimbursement of Fees. If prior to the amendment
to the Development Agreement and in ~he event Bedford is required
=o pay public facilities fees and/or RSA fees in an amount
greater than the amount set forth in the amendment to the
Development Agreement, Bedford shall be entitled to reimbursement
of the difference in the amount of the fees paid within thirty
(30) days of the .date of recordation of ~he Amendment to the
Development Agreement.
6. P~rks. Greenbelts ~nd P~seos. As additional
consideration for entering into this MOU, Bedford agrees to
dedicate, or cause =o be dedicated, and City agrees to accept,
park land, greenbelts, slopes and paseos to =he City equalling
approximately one hundred eighty six (186) acres subject
approval of =he Paloma Del Sol Association ("Association") and
the California Department of Real Estate ("DEE") only as to those
parcels within the 186 acres shown on Exhibit "B" attached and
made a par~ hereof by =his reference which are owned by the
Association or subject to an irrevocable escrow in favor of the
Association. If the Association and/or the DRE fail to approve
the transfer of the Phase I Parcels shown on Exhibit B to the
01-30-era 12221 -(XxX9 7
G:~N)L'~ltj~gra)lOOa6.ea2
City and therefore such property is not conveyed to the City,
such failure to convey shall not prevent Bedford from satisfying
its Quimby Park Fee obligation nor affect any other provision of'-
this MOU. The 186 acres are made up of the following five major
recreation areas as well as fifty five (55) acres of smaller in-
tract greenbelt paseos and eighty seven (87) acres of roadway
paseos, public parkway and slope landscaping. These areas are
shown on the attached Exhibit "A" incorporated herein and
described as follows:
(a) A seven and seventy-four hundredths (7.74)
acre park located in Tract 24133-2, Lot 114 ("7.74 Acre Park")
which consists of two baseball diamonds/soccer field combination
with lights, restroom and concession'building, group picnic area,
drinking fountains, trash receptacles, parking lot.
(b)
acre paseo park located in Tract 24133-3, Lot 106 ("13.84 Acre
Paseo Park") which consists of tot lots, basketball courts,
tennis court, picnic areas,with tables and barbecues,
walkways/bikeways with lighting.
A thirteen and eighty-four hundredths (13.84)
(c) An approximate five and nine tenths (5.9)
acre paseo park located in Tract 24134-3, Lots 68, 69, 70, 71 and
a portion of Lot 83 of Tract 24134-F ("5.9 Acre Paseo Park")
which consists of a tot lot, basketball court, picnic areas with
tables and barbecue, walkways/bikeways with lighting.
(d) A seven and forty-four hundredths (7.44) acre
park located in the Eastside (future) Tract 24186-4, Lot I ("7.44
Acre Park") which will consist of a combination soccer/baseball
field with lights, restrooms and concession building, group
picnic area, drinking fountains, trash receptacles, parking lot.
01 -)O-9"a 12221
G:%I)QC%15Z%9'aOlOOZG.IeZ 8
(e) A nine and thirty-five hundredths (9.35) acre
paseo park located in the Eastside (future) Tracts including:
Lots 159 and 160 of (future) Tract 24186-1; Lots 121 and 129 of
(future) Tract 24186-2 and Lot 121 of (future) Tract 24187-F
("9.35 Acre Paseo Park") which will consist of a basketball
court, tot lot, picnic area, walkway/bikeways with lighting
landscaping and irrigation.
(f) The remaining 142 acres of greenbelt paseos,
roadway paseos, public parkway and slope landscaping, both east
and west sides of Paloma Del Sol.
(g) Alk perimeter and interior greenbelt paseos,
roadway paseos, parks and slopes will be maintained by the
Temecula Community Services Distric"c ("TCSD"). All assessments
for maintenance shall be in compliance with the standards and
formulas imposed by the TCSD on a city-wide basis.
(h) The approximately one hundred eighty six
(186) acres of parks, greenbelts and paseos shall be transferred
to the City by grant deeds from Bedford and the Association,
depending on ownership. The City shall be responsible for
establishing any maintenance obligations with the TCSD associated
with the parks, paseos and greenbelt areas described in this MOU.
7. T4m~na of Park Tmmrovements and Transfer to City.
(a) The 7.74-Acre Park shall be fully improved
and transferred to the City on or before August 31, 1992.
(b) The 13.84-Acre Paseo Park shall be fully
improved and transferred to the City within six~zy (60) days of
the effective date of the amendment to the Development Agreement
and the 5.9-Acre Paseo Park within sixty (60) days after approval
of the DRE and the Association.
(c) Improvement to the 7.44-Acre Park shall
commence at the time of development of the adjoining tracts
ol -3o-,m 1~221 -ooo/,9
6:%Jx)c%ls~e-a)loo~.noz 9
(Tract Nos. 24186-1, 2, 3, 4 and Final). Improvements to the
9.35-Acre Paseo Park shall commence a= =he time of development of
=he adjoining tracts (Tract Nos. 24186-1, 2 and Final). ~
Improvements =o the 7.44 Acre Park and the 9.35-Acre Paseo Park
shall be completed and the parks transferred to =he City on or
before the issuance of 50% of the certificates of occupancy for
=he dwelling units constructed in the adjoining tracts.
(d) Improvement to and transfer of the remaining
142 acres of greenbelt paseos, roadway paseos, public parkway and
slope landscaping, both East and West sides of Paloma Del Sol
shall occur with the completion of development of the adjoining
tracts.
(e) Bedford may exwcend the improvement completion
and park transfer dates as set forth in this MOU with written
consent from the City.
(f) City shall receive and approve all park and
recreation facilities improvement plans in accordance with the
Citygs park standards, procedures and specifications except the
City shall accept withou~ any modifications =he improvements to
the 13.84-Acre Paseo Park ~nd the 5.9-Acre Paseo Park as ~
currently constructed and installed.
8. Fee Credits. At the time of completion of the
improvements and transfer of the 7.74-Acre Park and the 7.44-Acre
Park, respectively, Bedford shall receive a credit against
payment of the future Public Facilities Fees based on =he actual
improvement cost incurred by Bedford for each of said parks up to
a maximum credit of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) for each
park for a maximum total of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000).
City shall have a right to review, audit and verify all costs
associated with said park improvements under procedures to be
mutually agreed upon between the par%ies.
9. Standstill Aareement. Until the Development
Agreement is amended as contemplated by this MOU, the Standstill
01 -:SO-era ¶TYJI -OOOi9
e:VmC~lS~e'aO1OO~.mm 10
Agreement shall govern the rights and obligations of the parties
with regards to Quimby Park Fees associated with the Paloma Del
Sol project, except that it shall be amended to remain in full
force and effect until a certificate of occupancy is issued by
the City for the 500th residential dwelling unit in the Paloma
Del Sol project.
10. P~Tk Fee Ob3ia-t~on. Upon execution of this MOU
by the parties, regardless of undue delays or the outcome of any
lawsuit or action brought by County or terms of settlement of any
action or proceeding which may be instituted by the County
against City and/or Bedford relating to this MOU or the amendment
to the Development Agreement, Bedford's Quimby Park Fee
obligation for the Paloma Del Sol project shall be satisfied
based on the requirements provided in Specific Plan No. 219, and
Sections 6, 7 and 8 of this MOU.
11. Jurisdiction ,n~ Attorneys' Fees. This MOU is
made and entered into in the State of California, and this MOU,
and any rights, remedies,,or obligations provided for herein
shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of
the State of California.
12. Severability. If any portion, provision or part
of this MOU is held, determined, or adjudicated to be invalid,
unenforceable, or void for any reason whatsoever, each such
portion, provision, or part shall be severed from the remaining
portions, provisions, or parts of this MOU and shall not affect
the validity or enforceability of such remaining portions,
provisions, or parts.
13. F. nt~re Aureement. This MOU contains the entire
understanding and agreement between the parties hereto with
respect to the matters referred to herein. No other
representations, covenants, undertakings or other prior to
contemporaneous agreements, oral or written, respecting such
01-3Q-g2 12221 -IXX)&9
G:,kDQC%152%g201QQ26.RQZ 11
matters, which are not specifically incorporated heroin, shall be
deemed in any way to exist or bind any of ~he parties hereto.
The parties hereto acknowledge ~hat each party has not executed ~
this MOU in reliance on any such promise, representation, or
warranty.
14. Construction. This MOU shall not be construed
against the-parwcy preparing it, but shall be construed as if both
parties jointly prepared this MOU and any uncertainty and
ambiguity shall not be interpreted against any one party.
15. Amendment of A~reement. This MOU shall not be
modified by either party by oral representation made before or
after the execution of this MOU. All modifications must be in
writing and signed by ~he par~ies, and each of them.
16. T~me of the Rssence. Time is of the essence for
the performance of each and every covenants and the satisfaction
of each and every condition contained in this MOU.
17. No' Precommitment. City and Bedford understand
agree that certain actions of ~he City contemplated by this MOU
will require compliance with legal procedures regulations and
public hearings accompanied by discretionary decisions. The
parties acknowledge ~hat nothing contained in this MOU shall be
construed as a procommitment or requiring the City Planning
Commission or City Council to approve any discretionary actions
contemplated by ~his MOU.
17a. Pay Under Protest. Bedford agrees to withdraw its
notices of payment of permit fees under protest and will
terminate the Standstill Agreement relating to said fees upon
execution of ~his MOU.
ol -)o-e; 12221
i:%poc%lsz%f'aoloo2i,.noz 12
18. Counterparts. This MOU may be executed in any
number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an
original.
ATTEST:
une Greek, City Clerk
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott Field, City Attorney
BEDFORD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY,
By:
-
MESA HOMES,
ol -)o-9'a 12221 -o0o/.9
G: UXX::%ISZ%e'aO100ZG-NOU 13
III
),
m
EXHIBrl' B
T ;C;AT DI=qC'RIPTIClN
Association Prc~erty
PARCEL 1:
PARCF_T.. 2:
PARCEL 3:
PARCEL
Lots 67 to 71, inclusive, of Tract M~.No. 24[34-3, as per map filed in Book 23[. Pages:
of
to 8, inclusive, of Maps, Re:on:is ventde County, CAliforrtza.
Lot 83 of Tract Map No. 24134. as per map filed in Book 232, Pages 42 co 49, inclusive.
of Maps. Records of said County.
Lots 86 to 88. inclusive, of Tract Map No. 24134-1, as per map flied in Book 230, Pages
84 to 92, inclusive. of Maps, Records of said Count),.
F. as~m~nts for the maintenance of the landscapml and any impdon facilities appunenznt
thereto over that real property depicted on Exhibit F of the Dectaxation of Covenants.
Conditions and Restrictions for Paloma del So| recorded on Aulust 5, 99t, as Instrument
No. 91-267231 and m-recorded on September 5, 1991, as Instrument No. 91-307877, tit of
the Official Records of said County.
PARCEL I:
PARCEL 2:
!~l*,- II
Easemenu for the maintenance of the !andnpmIF and any impon facilities appurtenant
thesere cwer that rat F,,~F-,t'Y depicmd On Exhibit F of the Supptemonnt7 Declaz~on of
Covehats, Conditia6l aml Resttictima for Paloral del Sol ~ lI ,~.or~;l on August 5.
1991, u lnstnunmt No. 91-267232 and r~.,~cotdul on $epst. m~ 5, 1991, as Instrument
No. 91-307fY$, all of th, Of~jal ~ of mid County.
IZ-1141 I~-III1~
F:~I~%llxUJBL
-1S-
ITEM NO. 25
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane Henry, Finance Officer
August 11, 1992
Chamber of Commerce Agreement
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider the Chamber of Commerce
request for funding in the amount of $46,000.00.
BACKGROUND: At the City Council meeting of July 14, 1992, the Council
requested that financial information be provided by the Chamber to the Finance
Committee, including results of current year operations and the proposed fiscal year
1992-93 budget.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
The amount could be funded from account 001-100-999-
5266
Attachment:
Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce
Semi-Annual Contract Report
January through June 1992
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Dave Dixon, City Manager, City of Temecula
Leigh Engdahl, Executive Director, Chamber of Commerce
June 30, 1992
Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce
Semi-annual Contract Report
January through June 1992
1. INFORMATION
APPROXIMATELY 3,249 PEOPLE VISITED THE CHAMBER OFFICE.
APPROXIMATELY 1,100 PEOPLE VISITED THE VISITOR CENTER.
B. APPROXIMATELY 14,000 PHONE CALLS LOGGED:
1. 3,597 CALLS FOR PHONE DIRECTORY
2. 1,512 CALLS FOR RELOCATING PACKETS
3. 370 CALLS FOR BUSINESS PACKETS
4. 1,792 CALLS FOR TOURIST INFO
5. 912 CALLS FOR RECREATIONAL INFO
6. 223 CALLS FOR ORG./CALENDAR OF EVENTS
7. 2,956 CALLS FOR STREET LOCATIONS
8. 354 CALLS PERTAINED TO RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL R.E.
9. 2300 FOR SPECIAL EVENTS: BALOON/WINE & ROD RUN
*Note: These are strictly outside calls and do not
include any Chamber business, committee, or Board
business.
IN ORDER TO ANSWER AS MANY QUESTIONS AS POSSIBLE,
STATISTICAL INFORMATION, DIRECTORIES, FILES AND SURVEYS
ARE KEPT. MATERIALS AND ROSTERS ARE CONSTANTLY BEING
UPDATED.
2. TOURISM
IN PROCESS OF PRODUCING A COMMUNITY PICTORIAL. WILL
HIGHLIGHT THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE VALLEY, PROMOTE
TOURISM AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.
SENT PRESS RELEASES AND STORIES TO TOURISM RELATED
PUBLICATIONS CONCERNING EVENTS AND ATTRACTIONS IN THE
TEMECULAVALLEY. NOTE: WE WERE FEATURED ON CHANNEL 9
K-CAL'S NEW HOME SHOW IN APRIL 1992 AS A RESULT OF OUR
EFFORTS.
ASSISTED BOTH THE ROD RUN EVENT IN FEBRUARY AND THE
BALLOON & WINE FESTIVAL IN MAY WITH VOLUNTEERS,
STAFFING AND. SERVICES.
Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce
Contract Report - June 1992
Page 2
A TOURIST GUIDE PROJECT HAS BEEN APPROVED AND WILL BE
IMPLEMENTED LATER THIS YEAR.
MOVING THE SATELLITE VISITORS AND TOURIST CENTER IN THE
WITH THE MUSUEAM TO ACCOMMODATE VISITORS AND TOURISTS
AND ASSIST THE MUSEAUM WITH STAFFING AND EXPENSES.
TOURISM COMMITTEE MEETS TWICE PER MONTH AND ARE WORKING
ON A PROGRAM TO BRING 5TH STUDENTS FROM OTHER AREASS TO
THE VALLEY ON A FIELD TRIP TO LEARN OUR HISTORY AND
BRING INFORMATION BACK HOME TO THEIR PARENTS.
INDUSTRIAL & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
A. APPROXIMATELY 210 STATISTICAL PACKETS MAILED TO
DEVELOPERS, MANUFACTURERS, BUSINESSES INTERESTED IN
RELOCATING TO TEMECULA AND TO REAL ESTATE BROKERS AND
AGENTS.
LOCAL BUSINESS PROMOTIONS
"SHOP TEMECULA FIRST" PROJECT ENCOURAGES CONSUMERS TO
KEEP THEIR SHOPPING DOLLARS IN TEMECULA. CURRENTLY
WE ARE INITIATING A NEW PROJECT INVOLVING THE MAJOR
RETAILERS (K-MART, COSTCO) IN A "WHERE YOUR TAX MONIES
GO" PROGRAM.
CHAMBER AMBASSADORS AND STAFF ORGANIZED AND PUBLICIZED
APPROXIMATELY 90 RIBBON CUTTING CEREMONIES WELCOMING
NEW BUSINESSES TO TEMECULA.
CHAMBER PROVIDED 6 MIXERS, 6 EDUCATIONAL BREAKFASTS, A
BUSINESS LUNCHEON, AND HELD 2 BUSINESS SHOWCASES.
5. CIVIC & DEVELOPMENTAL AFFAIRS
SPONSORED A CANDIDATES FORUM FOR COUNTY SUPERVISOR
CANDIDATES IN MAY 1992.
IN THE PROCESS OF ORGANIZING A RECYCLING SYMPOSIUM WITH
MAJOR RECYCLERS IN THE CITY AS SPEAKERS. ADDITIONALLY,
WE WILL HAVE EXHIBITORS DISPLAYING RECYCLED PRODUCTS.
DURING THE PAST 6 MONTHS, 140 BUSINESS MEETINGS WERE HELD WITH
OVER 400 MEMBERS PARTICIPATING. SINCE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO
DOCUMENT ALL THE CHAMBER'S ACTIVITIES, THE ABOVE IS AS EXACT AS
POSSIBLE FROM RECORDS KEPT INTERNALLY.
R[~.4' DATE: 06/19/92
RUN TIME: 8:59 AM
Chamber of Commerce
Balance Sheet
AS OF 05/3i/92
PAGE
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
i02 Cash in Bank - Chamber
! 07 Returned Chetks
i09 Petty Cash
t I0 ~oney Market Savings
TOTAL - CURRENT ASSETS
FIXED ASSETS: 150 Office Furniture & Eqpmt.
152 Leasehold improvements
!55 Accumulated Depreciation
TOTAL - FIXED ASSETS
TOTAL ASSETS
15.690.82
410.00
[07.15
2.548.96
39.613.25
20.164.00'
37.625.00-
~9.756.93
22.152.25
41.909.18
DATE: 06/19/92
TIME: 8:59 AM
Chamber of Commerce
Balance Sheet
AS OF 05/31/92
PAGE 2
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
202
203
205
216
220
225
Accounts Payable-Concert
Accounts Payable-Other
Payroll Taxes Payable
Sales Tax Payable
Loans From Officers
Mixer Deposits Payable
4,490.05.
4,440.30 /
2,482.09
19.25
16,000.00
400.00
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
LONG TERM LIABILITIES: 241 Note Payable - Overland
245 Liability - LH Improvmts.
38,309.46
690.00
TOTAL - LONG TERN LIAB.
TOTAL LIABILITIES
EQUITY:
280
285
Retained Earnings
Current Earnings
TOTAL EQUITY
TOTAL LIAB. & EQUITY
27,831.69
38,999.46
61,372.61-
36,450.64/
66,831.15
24,921.97~'
41,909.18
JTE: 06/19/92
fINE: 8:58 AM
.............. THIS
INCOME THIS MONTH RITIO
Ch,mber of Commerce
Incole Statement
AS OF 05/31/92
Y E I R .............
8 MONTHS RATIO
PtGE I
,, THIS MONTH THIS YEAR
................. BUDGET ................
THIS MONTH 8 MONTHS YTD TAR.
** THIS MONTH'S BUDGET **
;NCOME:
3PSITiNG INCOME:
301 MemPershzp Renewsis 5,470.00 20.6 83.036.50 3i.9 9,000.00 68,500.00 5,463.50-
302 New Memberships 3,050.00 If.5 15,880.00 8.0 2,500.00 15,000.00 880.00
303 Computer Income 160.00 0.6 2,602.46 t.3 250.00 3,000.00 397.54-
304 letsKi Sales 82.69 0.3 2,673.20 1.4 200.00 1,600.00 1,073.20
305 Conference Room Rental 0.00 0.0 85.00 0.0 50.00 400.00 315.00-
306 luterest Income i2.04 O.O 64.i9 0.0 20.00 160.00 95.81-
308 Balloon and Wine 5,000.00 18.8 5,000.00 2.5 0.00 0.00 5,000.00
209 Contributions 0.00 0.0 625.06 0.3 0.00 0.00 625.06
316 Ren~ 360.00 1.4 2,880.60 1.5 360.00 2,880.00 O.O0
TOTAL OPERATING INCOME
14,134.73 53.2 9Z.846.4i 46.9
13,380.00 91,540.00 1,306.4i
COMMITTEE INCOME:
325 Marketing 1,220.25 4.6 20,144.75 10.2 8,000.00 27,000.00 6,855.25-
326 MemUersnap i,490.00 5.B 21.374.45 !0.8 0.00 lO,O00.O0 11,374.45
327 ~ays and Means 9,731.00 36.6 63,42i.69 32.1 8,550.00 69,400.00 5,978.3f-
TOTAL COMMITTEE INCOME t2,441.25 46.8 104,940.89 53.1 16,550.00 i06,400.00 1,459.ii-
TOTAL INCOME
26,575.98 iO0.O i97,787.30 lO0.O
28,930.00 i97,940.00 i52.70-
EXPENSES:
OPERATING EIPENSES:
509 Bank Charges .
510 Alarm Service./
511 Bank Card Discount
5i2 Bookkeeping
513 Business Kits '
514 Coffee/bier Service/
515 Computer Maintenance
518 Donations
520 Dues t Subscriptions
522 FAX
529 Health & Dental
531 insurance - Property
532 Insurance - Gen Liability
534 Interest
535 Janitoriai Service ~/
536 Legal
53~ Loan Fees
Meals
0.00 0.0 13.00 0.0 0.00 O.OO 13.00
0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 O.O0 130.00 i30.00-
70.26 0.3 i21.52 0.1 0.00 0.00 121.52
100.00 0.4 955.00 0.5 iO0.O0 1,300.00 345.00-
0.00 0.0 540.50 0.3 0.00 0.00 540.50
0.00 0.0 29.10 0.0 0.00 200.00 i70.90-
0.00 0.0 60.00 0.0 0.00 400.00 340.00-
500.00 1.9 500.00 0.3 0.00 0.00 500.00
0.00 0.0 675.00 0.3 0.00 50.00 625.00
30.35 O.l 230.29 0.1 50.00 600.00 369.7i-
0.00 0.0 i,809.66 0.9 200.00 i,900.00 90.31-
0.00 0.0 331.67 0.2 0.00 0.00 33i.67
0.00 0.0 2,570.i9 i.3 0.00 5,000.00 2,429.81-
i?.i5 O.i 3.646.58 1.8 450.00 4,188.68 542.10-
0.00 0.0 2i0.00 O.i 0.00 200.00 iO.O0
[,lO0.O0 4.1 !,400.00 0.7 0.00 0.00 i,400.00
0.00 0.0 iSO.O0 O.l 0.00 0.00 t50.00
20.00 0.1 392.75 0.2 50.00 450.00 57.25-
· "It: 06/19192
(INE: 8:58
Chubmr of Commerce
Income Statement
AS OF 05/31/92
PAGE 2
.............. THIS YEAB .............
]ATIO: INCOME THIS MONTH HATIO 8 MONTHS RATIO
s, THIS MONTH THIS YEll s$
................. BUDGET ................
THIS MONTH 8 MONTHS YTD VAR.
** THIS MONTH'S BUDGET **
540 Mileage 29.75 0.l 407.29 0.2 50.00 450.00 42.7~-
542 Pagans Service 28.00 O.l 155.52 O.i 0.00 0.00 155.52
545 Payroll 7,89H.75 29.7 6i,864.78 3i.3 7,390.00 59,700:00 2,164.78
546 Payroll Taxes 743.9i 2.8 6,059.64 3.1 750.00 6,150.00 90.36-
549 Phones 813.71 3.1 5,527.71 2.9 300.00 2,400.00 3,127.71
550 Phones - Leased Equipat 172.48 0.6 3,071.34 1.0 225.00 1,800.00 271.34
555 Postage 46.06- 0.2- 1,495.09 0.8 600.00 4,800.00 3,304.91-
558 Printing 125.29- 0.5- 808.26 0.4 100.00 800.00 8.26
560 Rent 2,345.14 8.8 I3.609.92 6.9 1,894.08 13,258.56 351.36
563 Repairs & Maintenance 908.91 3.4 1,808.99 0.9 100.00 2,000.00 191.01-
568 SCE 92.14 0.3 2,802.12 i.4 350.00 2,800.00 2.i2
570 Seminars liO.O0 0.4 llO.O0 O.l 0.00 200.00 90.00-
573 Supplies 361.87 1.4 1,779.56 0.9 500.00 4,000.00 2,220.44-
575 Storage 0.00 0.0 505.00 0.3 0.00 250.00 355.00
578 Taxes-Estimated Payments 0.00 0.0 432.00 0.2 0.00 1,400.00 968.00-
580 iortman's Compensation 0.00 0.0 475.72 0.2 0.00 700.00 224.28-
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
15,169.07 57.i 113,548.20 57.4
13,009.08 115,127.24 1,579.04-
COMMITTEE EXPENSES:
600 Membership 363.54 1.4 4,194.85 2.1 175.00 6,425.00 3,330.i5-
601 Marketing 2,854.38 10.7 16,361.08 8.3 2,200.00 17,725.00 i,363.92-
602 May I Means 1,137.14 4.3 27,043.77 i3.7 2,050.00 36,250.00 793.77
603 Civic t DeveLopment 72.44 0.3 188.76 &[ !0.00 i,080.O0 891'24-
TOTAL COMMITTEE EIPENSES 4,427.50 16.7 41,788.46 24.2 4,435.00 51,480.00 3'691'54-
TOTAL EXPENSES 19,596.57 73.7 161,336.68 81.6 1T,444.08 166,601.24 5,270.58-
NET REVENUE (EIPENSE)
6,979.41 26.3 36,450.64 18.4
11,485.92 31,332.76 5,117.88
TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
10/91 through 5/92
ANALYSIS
BALANCE SHEET:
10/91 5/92
Liabilities:
$84,978.34
66,831.15
In October 1991, the liabilities of $84,978 are expressed as
follows:
1. Accounts Payable-Chamber- $1,720: Normal operating payables
Accounts Payable-Concert-S11,809: These are outstanding
payables still due from the May 1991 concert. The Chamber
is making quarterly reductions on these payables to not
deplete cash flow.
Accounts Payable-Other-S4,440: This is an invoice
charged to the Chamber for Beach Boys Souvenirs and is in
dispute. "'
Loans from Officers-S16,000: After the May 1991 Concert, the
Chamber had a deficit of approximately $45,000. Eight
Chamber Directors loaned the chamber $2,000, to pay concert
payables and are scheduled to be paid back with the
fundraising proceeds beginning with Monte Carlo Night.
Note Payable #2-Overland Bank $17,350. This is a loan from
Overland Bank to pay concert payables. This loan was
ultimately rolled into our existing loan, which we are
paying on a monthly basis.
Note Payable-#l-Overland Bank $25,555. This was a loan made
to the Chamber in 1989, with an opening balance of $34,000.
The loan was made originally to cover expenses of the two
(2) previous Balloon & Wine Festivals. The Chamber makes
monthly payments on this loan.
Leasehold Improvements $5,289. This is a $700 per month
payment to Bedford that covers the tenant improvements done
to our offices when we moved in this location in 1989.
Note: The following is a breakdown of how we handled the concert
deficit of $45,000 indicating that no City funds were used to
cover concert· "
From Directors
From Bank
Outstanding
16,000
17,350
11,800
(quarterly reductions)
Total $45,150
Balance sheet -continued page 2
CONCERT:
The Beach Boys Concert was a special promotion in lieu of the
cancelled Balloon & Wine Festival in May 1991. The goal was to
sell 8,000 tickets to be profitable. Due to the Beach Boys
signing a contract to perform later that night in Costa Mesa,
they restricted us from marketing our concert in L.A. and Orange
Counties and this happened well after our event was publicized
and we had signed a contract with them. We fell 2,000 tickets
short at $25 each, leaving us upside down $50,000. We have asked
the Beach Boys management for a refund of monies we paid to them
and although they recognize that this was their fault, they could
not refund money, but would do another concert at a lesser fee.
Needless to say, we declined.
Current Status- Liabilities:
As of 5/31/92
Concert Payables have been reduced to $4,490.
Overland Bank loan has been reduced to $38,309.
Leasehold Improvements have been reduced to $690. which
corresponds with the end of our lease 7/31/92.
The liablilities are currently being paid monthly with the monies
raised through our fundraising efforts.
ASSETS:
Current assets are cash in bank: General operating fund and a
money market savings account.
Fixed assets are office furniture & equipment and leasehold
improvements.
PROFIT & LOSS STATEMENT
INCOME
5/31/92
Actual Budget Budget
8 mos. 8 mos. 12 mos.
Page 3
Membership renewals
New Memberships
Computer Income
Retail Sales
Conference Room
Interest Income
Balloon & Wine
City Contract
TOTAL OPERATING
Marketing (publications)
Membership
Ways & Means (fundraising)
TOTAL INCOME
63,036 68,500 104,500
15,880 15,000 25,500
2,602 3,000 4,000
2,673 1,600 2,400
85 400 600
65 160 240
5,000 -0- -0-
-0- -0- 45,000
92,846 91,450 182,240
20,145 27,000 46,000
21,375 10,000 10,000
63,240 69,400 88,600
197,787 197,740 326,840
NOTES TO INCOME STATEMENT:
The Marketing Committee budgeted income consists of
publications revenues as follows:
1991 Map $ 5,000
1992 Map 5,000
Pictorial 6,000
Newsletter 30,000
TOTAL $46,000
(advertising income, approximately
$2,500 per month)
The Membership Committee held a membership drive in April
which generated $11,000 of income not anticipated or
budgeted for.
The Ways & Means Committee is the fundraising committee and
since October has held 6 fundraisers and 7 mixers as follows
below. These are not "net" income figures, the expenses
conncected to these events are reflected on the Expense
Statement on page 4.
Monte Carlo Night $ 7,900
Business Showcases 17,870
Golf Tournament 12,020
Installation Banquet 8,975
Secretary's Day 4,390
President's Club $ 2,200
TOTAL FUNDRAISING $63,240
Expenses (27,043)
Net 36,197
PROFIT & LOSS STATEMENT
EXPENSES: (only dollar amounts over $100 YTD)
Page 4
Actual Budget Budget
8 mos. 8 mos. 12 mos.
Bookkeeping 955 1,300 800
Business kits 540 -0- '0-
Donations 500 -0- '0-
Health & Dental 1,800 1,900 3,000
Insurance 2,570 5,000 5,000
Legal 1,400 -0- '0-
Loan Interest 3,645 4,188 5,500
Payroll 61,845 59,700 79,500
Payroll taxes 6,059 6,150 8,200
Phones 5,527 2,400 3,600
Phone Equipment 3,071 1,800 2,700
Postage 1,495 4,800 7,200
Rent 13,600 13,260 22,700
Repairs/Maintenance 1,808 2,000 3,600
Supplies 1,780 4,000 6,000
Taxes 430 1,400 2,800
Utilities 3,800 2,800 3,800
Workman's Comp. 475 700 1,400
Other 2,309 2,343 2,130
TOTAL OPERATING
Membership Committee
Marketing Committee
Ways & Means Committee
Civic & Developmental
TOTAL EXPENSES
113,548 115,127 156,180
4,194 6,425 7,375
16,361 17,725 26,925
27,043 26,250 30,550
200 1,080 1,200
161,366 166,607 221,030
Notes to Expense Statement:
Membership Committee expense is related to printing of
Membership packages and expenses related to the Drive.
Marketing Committee expenses include the printing of the
Newsletter, Shop Temecula First projects, Tourism
projects and other publications.
Ways & Means expenses are the expenses related to
producing the fundraisers noted on page 3.
Civic & Developmental Committee expenses are for the
Candidates Forum. The budgeted amount is for a Scholarship
Fund through the High School.
1992-1993 CHAMBER PROJECTS:
Page 5
Visitor and Information Center- overhead
Shop Temecula First project
Historical/Museum brochure
Tourism School Project
Recycling Symposium
Film Commission
Research & Marketing (includes staff)~
Relocation Packages
Demographics/research/studies/production
Housing information
Map
Pictorial
Trade Shows
Tourist Guide
TOTAL PROJECTS:
$3,500
6,000
7,000
5,000
2,000
7,000
3,000
4,000
1,000
900
1,500
3,000
1,600
$45,500
RUN DATE: 10/31/91
RUN TIME: 7:38 PM
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Balance Sheet
AS OF 09/30/91
PAGE 1
Assets
Current Assets:
1010 Cash In Bank - Chamber
1015 Cash In Bank-Spec Events
1050 Petty Cash
1060 Money Market Savings
1100 Accounts Receivable
Total - Current Assets
Fixed Assets:
1500 Office Furniture & Eqpmt.
1520 Leasehold Improvements
1530 Accumulated Depreciation
Total - Fixed Assets
Other Assets:
Total - Other Assets
Total Assets
7,883.29
1.539.84
107.15
1.484.77
350.00
39,613.25
20,164.00
37.625.00-
11,365.05
22.152.25
0.00-
33.517.3..~
......... ~___
RUN DATE: 10/31/91
RUN TIME: 7:38 PM
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Balance Sheet
AS OF 09/30/91
LIABILITIES & EQUITY
PAGE
2
Current Liabilities:
2005
2007
2008
2010
2040
2050
2100
2150
Accounts Payable-Other
Accounts Payable-Chamber
Accounts Payable-Concert
Payroll Taxes Payable
Sales Tax Payable
Loans from Officers
Mixer Deposits Payable
Note Payable#2-Overland
Total - Current Liab.
Long Term Liabilities:
2900 Note Payable-Overland
2920 Liability - LH Improvmts
Total - Long Term Liab.
Total Liabilities
Equity:
~00
00
3900
Capital Gains & Losses
Retained Earnings
Current Earnings
Total Equity
Total Liab. & Equity
4,440 30
11,150 33
11,809 93
2,158 99'
63 72
16,000 00
600 O0
17,350 O0
26,666.68
5,914.84
63,573.27
32,581.52
96.154.79
71.00
1.647.56
64.356.05-
62,637.49-
33,517.30
RUN DATE: 10/31/91
RUN TIME: 7:28 PM
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
income State~en~
AS OF 09130/9!
.............. THiS YEAR .............
~.t:IC: INCOM:' THIS MONTH RATIO I2 MONTHS RATIO
** THIS MONTH THIS YEAR **
................. BUDGET ...............
TEiS MONTH 12 MONTHS YTD VAR.
,, THIS MONTH'S BUDGET **
OPERATING REVENUES:
4000 MemUersnxo Dues 10,505.00 60.7 139.499.00 29.6 17,600.00 188,800.00 49,301.00-
4020 Comnuter Income 250.00 1.4 8.590.00 1.8 300.00 3,600.00 4,990.00
4040 Conference Room Rentai 25.00 O.i 925.00 0.2 0.00 0.00 925.00
4045 Donations 0.00 O.C 1,908.28 0.4 0.00 0.00 1.908.28
4050 City Contract 0.00 0.0 67,500.00 14.3 0.00 0.00 67,500.00
4060 Interest Income 0.00 0.0 109.80 0.0 0.00 0.00 109.80
4080 Retail Sales 0.00 0.0 3.014.43 0.6 300.00 3.600.00 585.57-
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES
10,780.00 62.3 221,546.5! 47.0
18,200.00 I96,000.00 25,546.51
COMMITTEE REVENUES:
MIXERS:
4120 Bar hies 264.34 1.5 3.836.63 0.8 400.00 9,900.00 6.063.37-
4130 Busmess Showcase 2,935.00 17.0 5.070.00 1.! 0.00 0.00 5,070.00
4!40 Drawmg 150.00 0.9 1.856.50 0.4 600,00 7,200.00 5,343.50-
4180 Non-member Fees 225.00 1.3 i.480.00 0.3 150.00 1.800.00 320.00-
4200 SIlent Auctxon 0.00 O.O 423.00 0.! 0.00 0.00 423.00
Totai- Mixers 3,574.34 20.7 12.666.13 2.7 1,150.00 i8.900.00 6,233.87"'
PUBLICATIONS:
4269 Newsletter AOx, ert~sm~
Tot~i - Publtcations
0.00 0.0 4.741.00 1.0 0.00 3,000.00 a.741.00
2,120.75 12.2 26,387.98 5.6 2,000.00 24,500.00 1,887.98
2.120.75 12.3 31.128.98 6.~ 2,000.00 27,500.00 3.628.9~
YOUT~ COMMISSION:
4300 Booths - B&W & lrac Race 0.00 0.0 163.9! 0.0 0.00 !.500.00 1,336.09-
432~ Car ias~ 0.00 0.§ O.OC O.O 0.00 300.00 300.00-
43~C Dona~:ons 0.00 0.(' 0.00 0.0 0.00 500.00 500.00-
436; Other Income 0.00 O.O O.OC O.O O,OO 200.0C 200,00-
438< Youth Dance 0.00 O.O 744.58 0.2 0.00 0.00 744.58
~o~: - Youth Commlsslcn 0.00 O.O 908.49 0.2 0.00 2,500.0C 1.591.51-
.~... BUSINESS PROMOTION:
439 Busxness Luncheon 862.50 5.0 5.293.50
Tcta! - Local Bus. Promc. 862.50 5.[, 5.293.50
0.00 0.0§ 5,293.50
0.00 0.00 5,293.50
TOTAL COMMITTEE REVENUES 6,557.59 37.9 49.997.10
3.150.00 48,900.00 1,097.10
SPECIAL EVENT REVENUES:
4420 CASINO NIGHT 0.00 O.C 6.310.00 1.3
4440 CONCERT 0.00 O.C 170,170.12 36.!
4460 INSTALLATION BANQUET 0.00 0.0 8,877.58
4480 BALLOON & WINE 0.00 0.0 13.i86.93 2.8
0.00 20,500.00 14,190.00
0.00 15.500.00 i54.670.i2
0.00 10.000.00 1,122.42-
0.0¢ 30.000.00 16,8i3.07-
DATE: i~/3!/91 CHAMBER OF COMNERCE PAGE 2
TIME: 7:28 PM
income St~t.ent
A5 OF 09/30/S1
.............. TH,'S YEAR .............................. BUDGET ................
INCOME THIS MONTH RATIC !2 MONTHS RATIO THIS MONTH !2 MONTHS YTD VAR.
.. THIS MONTH THIS YEAR *' ** THIS MONTH'S BUDGET **
PADRES DAY 45.00- 0.3- :.410.00 0.3
TCTiL SPEC EVENT REVENUES 45.00- 0.3- !99.974.6~ 42.4
C.O0 O.O0 :.436.00
0.00 76.000.00 !23.974.6~
TCT~L iEVENUES
17.292.59 IO0.C 471.518.24 !00.0
21.250.00 320.900.00 !50.618.24
??ERAT!NO EXPENSES:
FO00 Salar:es 7,750.00
?020 Payroii Tries f92.90
~030 Hea,tn. Denta{ insurance 681.25
5040 Accountln~ Services O.OO
~050 Alarm Service 45,00
~060 Ean~ Car~ Discount 4.56
~070 Boo~ee~n~ 760.00
~080 Busxness K:ts 270.00
~090 Coffee/Water Serv~ce 0.00
~]00 ComPuter Exnense 85.06
~!:.L Denrecxatzon !4.400.00
~!. Donations 0.00
~!30 Dues/Subscr:ptxons 297.50
~E40 Eouxoment Renta{ 9[5.43
~!50 FAX
~!60 Insurance - D~r & Off
~:70 Insurance - Gen Liabx{ity t.854.67
6!80 Interest ExDeue 276.69
~190 Jan~Lorxai
~230 Left{ 0.00
~210 Loan Pmt.-See LiaDxiaties 0.00
~220 Loan Fees O.O0
~230 MIleage 57.96
~235 Mea!s 0.00
~240 Miscellaneous/Contingency 52.81
~250 Penalties 0.00
~260 Pesta{e 400.28
~2~5 Personai Prosetry Tax 0.00
~270 ?rxntxn~ 628.18
~280 ?rout:on 135.00
d230 ?rovlszon for income Tax 698.00
6300 Ren~ ,3.00
;310 Reulrs ~ Haxn:enanc~ :.494.36
~320 Semxnars/Wor~sneUs C.O0
~325 Storage
~2""' Telennone L.~04.77
~3~,. Utlilt;es ~34.92
~180 WorEun's Co~nensatxon
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
44,8 96,987.84 20.6
~.-, 8.644.14 1.8
','.9 3.768.01 0.8
0.0 0.00 0.0
,'s.3 270.00 0.!
0.0 453.98 0.1
4.4 2.200.95 0.5
!.6 950.00
0.0 !66.30 0.0
0.5 3,191.80 0.7
83.3 !4,400.00 3.1
0.0 24.55 0.0
i.7 ~.275.95 9.3
=" 2 v':.67 0.6
O .0 0.00 0.0
C.O 0.00 0.0
10.7 8.056.96 !.3
' 6 6.361.19 1.3
!.8 !,239.00 0.3
0.0 747.50- 0.2-
0.0 0.00 0.0
0.0 350.00 0.1
0.3 514.16 0.1
0.0 574.55 O.l
0.3 521.36 0.1
O.O 278,99 O.l
2.3 3,148,93 0.7
rj.O 614.22 0.1
3.E 3.3!8.44 0.7
0.~ 3i0.00 .3.!
4.0 5.592.00 1.2
,3.0 i4,847.90 3.1
8 .~ 2.868.06 0.6
." ,' 457 a,
].i i,167.3~ 0.2
5.~ 2.692.42
e.? ~,633.82 !.2
4.d 4.789.12 !.O
O.O0 O.C !.914.95 0.4
~ ':6 ~s 203 ~ 197 448.95 41.9
8.000.00 96.000.00 987.84
800.00 9.600.C0 955.86-
200.00 2,400.00 1.368.01
O.O0 500.00 500.00-
65.00 780.00 510.00-
O.O0 0.00 453.98
400.00 4,800.00 2.599.05-
0.00 0.00 950.00
lO0.O0 t,200.00 !,033.70-
250.00 4,750.00 1.558.20-
0.00 0.00 !4,400.00
0.00 0.00 24,55
0.00 470.00 805.95
!00.00 1.200.00 1,511.67
50.00 600.00 600.00-
70.00 840.00 840.00-
500.00 6,000.00 56.96
0.00 0.00 6,381.19
120.00 1,440.00 201.00-
500.00 6,000.00 6,747.50-
i,lO0.O0 [3,200.00 i3.200.00-
0.00 0.00 350.00
75.00 i.lO0.O0 585.84-
25.00 400.00 !74.55
600.00 3,900.00 3.378.64-
0.00 0.00 278.99
600.00 7,200.00 4,051.07-
0.00 0.00 6{4.22
0.00 4.800.00 !,481.56-
0,00 0.00 310.00
O.O0 0.00 5,592.00
2.500.00 30.000.00 15.152.10-
lO0.O0 1.200.00 1,668.06
C.O0 500.00 42.19-
0.00 0.00 1.!67.38
400.00 4.800.00 2.107.~8-
300.00 3,600.00 2,033.82
450.00 5,400.00 6{0.88-
0.00 0.00 1.814.95
17,305.00 212,680.00 15,231.05-
:JN DATE: i0131/91
~UN TIME: 7:28 PM
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Income Statement
AS OF 09/30/9[
PAGE
.............. THIS YEAR .............................. BUDGET ................
INCOME THIS MONTH RATIO 12 MONTHS RATIO THIS MONTH I2 MONTHS YTD VAR.
,, THIS MONTH THIS YEAR ,, ,, THIS MONTH'S BUDGET ,,
;CMM!TTEE EXPENSES:
~iXERS:
~390 Bar 0.00 0.3 2.7B4.25 0.6 0.00 5.130.00 2,215.75-
~395 Busxness Showcase ..049.38 8.! 1.049.38 0.2 0.00 O.OO !.049.38
~400 Drawxng Frlge O.O0 O.G 643.24 O.i 200.00 2.400.00 1.756.78-
:4!C Drawln~ TicKets 0.00 0.0 10.20 G.O 0.00 60.00 49.80-
~420 Drxnk Tickets O.O0 O.O 36.40 O.O 0.00 200.00 163.60-
:430 Entertalnment 300.00 1.7 788.00 0.2 !50.00 1,800.00 1.0[2.00-
f440 Lzuuor LIcense 25.00 0.i 25.00 0.0 25.00 300.00 275.00-
7450 Name Tags 0.00 O.O O.O0 0.0 0.00 300.00 300.00-
~460 ?osta~e/insert~on ii.55 O.l 513.52 O.1 240.00 2.755.00 2.241.48-
~70 Sx~na~e 0.00 O.O 0.00 0.0 0.00 350.00 350.00-
?480 SuDui~es 0.00 0.0 134.87 O.O 20.00 240.00 !35.03-
Tota} - Mixers
:.395.93 t.l 5.554.96
635.00 13.505.00 7.550.04-
'?BLiCATIONS:
~500 Mac Exoduses 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 500.00 500.00-
?~I0 Newsietter Pr~ntxng 5,025.46 29.1 !6,917.90 3.6 !,500,00 17,800,00 882,10-
~520 Postage 270,3l l.~ 2,7~1.20 0,6 0,00 O.O0 2,761.20
i~3O TyUeset ~ Layout Q.O0 0.0 [.O00.O0 0.2 500.00 6.000.00 5.000.OO-
Total - Pub[xcatxons 5.295.77 30.6 20,679.10 4.4 2,000,00 24,300,00 3,620,90-
tMBASSADORS:
~550 Awards - !nstallat~on 0.00 0.0 O.O0 0.0 0.00 50.00 50.00-
?560 Badges 0.00 0.0 50.86 0.0 0.00 80.00 29.14-
~570 Film/Ribbon Cuttings 7.00 0.0 367.73 0.1 iO.O0 !20.00 247.73
?580 Postage 0.00 0.0 48.05 0.O 0.00 0,00 48.0~
!590 Soctals O.O0 O.C C.~O C.O .T... lO0.O0 lO0.O0-
Total - Ambassaucrs 7.CO 466.e4 0,l 35,00 350,00 i16,64
:SiSLATi'ji:
'?!': .-~:~.:'..e Conference 0.00 0.C, 52.70 0.0 0,00 300,00 247.30-
T~20 Postage J.O0 O.O 26.22 0.0 0.00 450,00 423'78-
Total - Lqtsiatlve 0.00 O.C 78.92 O.0 0.00 750,00 67[.08-
.T!jTH COMMISSION:
Fe35 hnouet 0.00 O.C O.CO · '?.O 0.00 500.00 500.00-
?~4C ~octh items O.O0 O.C C~.OO 0.0 G.O0 700.00 700.00-
i{SC Booth Space O.O0 0.3 i07.50 0.0 0.00 I00.00 7.50
:'~55 Flyors 0.00 0.0 34.59 0.0 0.00 0,00 34.59
~660 ?ostage 0,00 0,O H.88 0.0 40,00 400,00 303,12-
?~70 Ren Program - Booklet O.00 O.'C 0.00 0,0 0,00 400,00 400,00-
~680 Hen Program - Caras O.O0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 400.00 400.00-
~690 Youth Dance 0.00 0.0 8{7.i4 0.2 0.00 0.00 8{7.14
Tota}- Youth Commxssxon
0.00 0.0 !.056.it 0.2
40.00 2,500,00 1,443,89-
GN DATE: 10/3!/91 CEAMEMR OF COMMERCE PAGE 4
.~N ?!ME: 7:28 PM
income Statement
AS OF 09/30/91
.............. THiS !fEAR .............
· ~.TIO: INCOME THIS MONTE RATIO !2 MONTBS RATIO
· * TZ!S MONTH THIS YEAR **
................. BUDGET ................
T.~IS MONTH 12 MONTHS YTD VAR.
** HIS MONTE'S BUDGET **
.2URiSM:
?ocnures 0.00 0.0 320.25 0.1 O.O0 6,400.00 6,079.75-
Event Part!ciDatlon 0.00 G.O 46.00 O.O 0.00 1,000.00 960.00-
Postage 0.00 .3.0 22.09 0.0 0,00 0.00 22.09
Sem~nars/SuDscrzptions O.O0 0.0 C.O0 0.0 0.00 545.00 545.GO-
Travel Shows 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 1.500.00 !.50O.O0-
Tstai- Tourzsm O.O0 ,D.O 382.34 0.1 C.O0 9,445.00 9,062.86-
~EMBERSE!P:
'~?0 Dxnners
'~0 Gooa Morning Temecuia
F?90 KitPoll
~00 Materials
~elO Neuersn~n E~ts
~20 Pestue
~30 ?rznttng
?~40 TroDrites
~50 ~zne i Cheese
?eta{ - MemDersn{D
~.00 C.0 479.38 O.! 0.00 1.200.00 720.62-
0.00 0.0 i3.80 0.0 50.00 600.00 586.20-
~45.00 ?.8 227.46 0.0 0.00 200.00 27.46
37.70 0.2 !16.70 O.O 0.00 200.00 83.30-
0.00 6.C O.O0 0.0 0.00 500.00 500.00-
13.92 0.! 730.83 0.2 O.O0 400.00 330.83
'~.00 0.~ !,i90.75 0.3 0.00 200.00 990.75
6!.63 '0.~ 231.97 0.0 0.00 200.00 31.97
O.O0 0.'3 545.07 O.l 400.00 i,600.00 1.054.93-
35~.25 2.! 2.535.96 0.7
450.00 5,i00.00 :,564.04-
_3CAL BUSINESS PROMOTION:
~875 9uslness Luncheon B05.39 5.2 4.670.23 1.0- 0.00 0.00 4.670.23
~880 jxn~le - Reproduction 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 IO0.O0 100.00-
~890 Logo Contest Pr:ze 0.00 0.0 200.00 0.0 0.00 200.00 0.00
0900 Logo Kits 0.00 0.0 58.50 0.0 0.00 IO0.O0 41.50-
~910 Logo Reproduction 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 150.00 150.00-
~20 Name Tags 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 150.00 150.00-
~930 Postage 0.00 0.0 598.95 O.l 15.00 380.00 218.95
~940 Pos~er O.O0 0.0 744.49 0.2 0.00 !.000.00 255.51-
~950 Pr~ntXng 0.00 O.O 649.29 0.1 O.O0 50.00 599.29
:~60 Sem:nars O.O0 0.0 21.30 0.0 500.00 2,000.00 1,978.70-
~965 Soec~a} ActlvlLles 0.00 0.0 i00.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 lO0.O0
?970 7raoemar~ 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 500.00 500.00-
Tctal- Local Bus Promo
905.39 5.2 v,042.76 1.5
515.00 4,630.00 2.412.76
T~TAL C~MMITTEE EXPENSES 7,962.34 46.~ 39,!96.79 8.3
3,675.00 60.580.00 21.383.2!-
~?EC!~L EVENT E'(PENSES:
i':ogram Erierises:
:'qnO CiSINO NIGHT O.OO =3.0 4.937.77 :,O 0.00 i0,000.00 5,062.23-
-~njk CONCERT '23,878.21 138.1 225.~58.64 47.9 0.00 8,000.00 2i7.858.64
'?. iNSTALLATION BANQUET n.O0 'D.C 9.551.31 2.0 O.O0 7,250.00 2.301.31
'~:20 BALLOON t WINE 0.06 O.O 8.299.54 !.8 0.00 3,600.00 4,699.54
?023 PADRES DAY 0.00 0.0 !,086.27 0.2 0.00 0.00 1.086.27
?otai Program Exnenses 23,878.21 138.! 249.733.53 53.0 0.00 28,850.00 220,883.53
DATE: lO/31/SJ CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PAGE 5
TIME: 7:28 PM
Income Statement
AS OF 09130/9!
.............. THIS YEAR .............
:..t'.~.C: INCOME THIS MONTH RATIO I2 MONTHS RATIO
** THIS MONTH THIS YEAR **
................. BUDGET ................
THiS MONTH 12 MONTHS YTD VAR.
** THIS MONTH'S BUDGET ,,
'j~ner Expenses:
?022 Coffee/Water Service 0.00 0.0 99.95 0.0 0.00 0.00 99.95
~035 F~x 0.00 0.0 34.04 0.0 0.00 0.00 34.04
7038 Health/Dental Insurance 0.00 O.O 464.40 0.1 0.00 0.00 464.40
704! insurance 0.00 0.0 46.78 0.0 0.00 0.00 46.78
7044 Postage 0.00 0.0 488.23 0.1 0.00 0.00 488.23
7050 Meals 0.00 0.0 74.96 0.0 0.00 0.00 74.96
70~3 Repaxrs & Maintamnance 0.00 0.0 373.27 0.1 0.00 0.00 373.27
7056 Saiarxes/laxes 0.00 0.0 43,006.89 9.1 0.00 O.OO 43,006.89
705 S~orage 0.00 0.0 682.06 0.! 0.00 0.00 682.08
7062 Supplies 0.00 0.0 1.092.56 0.2 0.00 0.00 1.092.56
7065 Telephone 0.00 0.0 2,276.40 0.5 0.00 0.00 2,276.40
7068 Utilitxes 0.00 0.0 855.48 0.2 0.00 O.OO 855.48
Total - Other Expenses
0.00 0.0 49,495.02 10.5
0.00 0.00 49,495.02
TOTAL SP EVENT EXPENSES
TOTAL EXPENSES
23,878.2i 138.1 299,228.55 63.5
66.997.47 387.4 535.874.29 113.6
0.00 28,850.00 270,378.55
20.980.00 302.110.00 233.764.29
NET REVENUE (EXPENSE~
49,704.88- 287.4- 64,356.05- 13.6-
370.00 18,790.00 83.i46.05-
TIME:
05/12/92
1:16 PN
Chamber of Commeroe
Balance Sheet
AS OF 04/30/92
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
PAGE 2
ZURRENT LIABILITIES:
202
203
205
216
220
225
Accounts Payable-Concert
Accounts Payable-Other
Payroll Taxes Payable
Sales Tax Payable
Loans From Officers
Mixer Deposits Payable
4,490 05
4,440 30
2.324 95
12 85
16,000 O0
400 O0
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
'_ONG TERM LIABILITIES: 241 Note Payable - Overland
245 Liability - LH Improvmts.
38.309.46
1,371.85
TOTAL - LONG TERM LIAB.
TOTAL LIABILITIES
~-qUITY:
0
285
Retained Earnings
Current Earnings
TOTAL EQUITY
TOTAL LIAB. & EQUITY
27,668.15
39,681.31
61,372.61-
29.471.23
67,349..16
31,901.38-
35,448.O8
!N DATE: 05/12/92
~UN TIME: 1:i6 PM
Chamber of Commerce
Balance Sheet
AS OF 04/30/92
PAGE
ASSETS
:RRENY ASSETS:
Cash zn Bank - Chamber
Returned Checks
Petty Cash
Honey Market Savl~s
TOTAL - CURRENT ASSETS
iXED ASSETS:
_50 Office Furniture i Eqpmt.
52 Leasehold improvements
,55 Accumula!ed Depreciation
TOTAL - FIXED ASSETS
TOTAl. ASSETS
9.531.76
320.00
:07.15
3.536.92
39.613.25
20.164.00
37,825.00-
13.J95.83
35.448.08
2UN DATE: 04/12/92
qUN TIME: 5:42 PM
Chamber of Commerce
BaLance Sheet
AS OF 03/31/92
PAGE
2
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
'2URRENT LIABILITIES:
202
203
205
216
220
225
Accounts Payable-Concert
Accounts Payable-Other
Payroll Taxes Payable
Sales Tax Payable
Loans From Officers
Mixer Deposits Payable
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
il.809 93'
4,440 30
3.182 29
78 64
16,000 O0
600 O0
:.ONG TERM LIABILITIES: 241 Note Payable - Overland
245 Liabllity- LH Improvmts.
39.006.46
2.045.28
TOTAL - LONG TERM LIAB.
TOTAL LIABILITIES
Y"' ITY:
285
Retained Earnings
Current Earnings
TOTAL EQUITY
TOTAL LIAB. & EQUITY
36.111.16
41.051.74
62,576.89-
15,375.37
77,162.90
47.201.52-
29,961.38
~UN DATE: 04/12/92
~UN TIME: 5:42 PH
Chamber of Commerce
Balance Sheet
AS OF 03/31/92
PAGE
ASSETS
:URRENT ASSETS: 102 Cash in Bank - Chamber
107 Returned Checks
L09 Petty Cash
110 Money Market Savings
TOTAL - CURRENT ASSETS
=IXED ASSETS:
t50 Office Furniture & Eqpmt.
152 Leasehold Improvements
155 Accumulated Depreciation
TOTAL - FIXED ASSETS
TOTAL ASSETS
3,946.67
230.00
107.15
3,525.31
39.613.25
20,164.00
37,625.00-
7,809.13
22,152.25
29,961.38
j; D~TE
TIME
= 05/17/92
= 7=25 PM
Chamber of Commerce
Balance Sheet
AS OF 02/28/92
PAGE
2
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
202
205
216
220
225
Accounts Payable-Concert
Accounts Payable-Other
Payroll Ta×es Payable
Sales TaM Payable
Loans From Officers
Mixer Deposits Payable
11,809.95
4,440.50
2,859.14
16,000.00
600.00
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
LONG TERM LIABILITIES: 241 Note Payable - Overland
245 Liability - LH Improvmts.
59,705.46
2,710.40
TOTAL - LONG TERM LIAB.
TOTAL LIABILITIES
EQUITY:
280
285
Retained Earnings
Current Earnings
TOTAL EQUITY
TOTAL LIAB. & EQUITY
55,749.52
42,415.86
62,576.89-
14,866.85
78,165.18
47,710.04-
50,455~14
RUN DATE: 05/17/c~2
RUN T I ME: 7: 25 PM
Chamber of Commerce
Balance Sheet
AS OF 02/28/92
PAGE
1
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS: 102 Cash in Bank - Chamber
107 Returned Checks
109 Petty Cash
110 Money Market Savings
TOTAL - CURRENT ASSETS
FIXED ASSETS: 150 Office Furniture & Eqpmt.
152 Leasehold Improvements
155 Accumulated Depreciation
TOTAL - FIXED ASSETS
TOTAL ASSETS
4~540.58
140.00
107.15
59~615.25
20~164.00
57,625.00-
8,~00.89
22,152.25
50,455.14
~TE: 02/12/92
TIME: 9:45 PM
Chamber of Commerce
Balance Sheet
AS OF 01/51/e2
PAGE
2
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
3URRENT LIABILITIES:
201
202
205
216
22¢)
225
Accounts Payable-Chamber
Accounts Payable-Concert
Accounts Payable-Other
Payroll Taxes Payable
Sales Tax Payable
Loans From Officers
Mixer Deposits Payable
800.00
11,809.95
4,440.50
2,589.21
50.08
16,000.00
600.00
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
LONG TERM LIABILITIES: 241 Note Payable - Overland
245 Liability - LH Improvmts.
40,400.46
5,567.51
TOTAL - LONG TERM LIAB.
TOTAL LIABILITIES
E~UITY:
280
285
Retained Earnings
Current Earnings
TOTAL EQUITY
TOTAL LIAB. & EQUITY
56,069.52
45,767.77
79,857.29
62,576.89-
17,646.69
44,950.20-
54,907.09
/
~UN DATE: 02/12/92
~UN TIME: 9:45 PM
Chamber of Commerce
Balance Sheet
AS OF 01/51/92
PAGE
ASSETS
3URRENT ASSETS:
102 Cash in Bank - Chamber
107 Returned Checks
lOe Petty Cash
110 Money Market Savings
TOTAL - CURRENT ASSETS
=IXED ASSETS: 150 Office Furniture & Eqpmt.
152 Leasehold Improvements
155 Accumulated Depreciation
TOTAL - FIXED ASSETS
TOTAL ASSETS
9,005.48
140.00
107.15
5,502.21
599615.25
20,164.00
57,625.00-
12,754.84
22,152.25
907.
i 01/07/92
TIME= 11:0~ PH
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Balance sheet
AS OF 12/31/91
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
PAGE
2
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
202
205
205
216
220
225
Accounts Payable-ConcePt
Accounts Payable-OtheP
PayPoll Taxes Payable
Sales Tax Payable
Loans FPom OfficePs
MixeP Deposits Payable
11,809.~5
4,440.50
2~048.85
123.28
16,000.00
600.00
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
LONG TERM LIABILITIES: 241 Note Payable - OvePland
245 Liability - LH ImpPovmts.
41,097.46
4,016.11
TOTAL - LONG TERM LIAB.
TOTAL LIABILITIES
:QUITY:
280 Retained EaPnings
285 CuP~ent EaPnings
TOTAL EQUITY
TOTAL LIAB. & EQUITY
55,022.56
45,115.57
80,155.95
62~576.8~-
12,721.65
4~,855.26-
30,280.67
/
RUN DATE: 01/07/92
RUN TIME: 11:06 PM
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Balance Sheet
AS OF 12/51/91
PAGE
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
102 Cash in Bank - Chamber
107 Returned Checks
lOe Petty Cash
110 Money Market Savings
TOTAL - CURRENT ASSETS
FIXED ASSETS: 150 Office Furniture & Eqpmt.
152 Leasehold Improvements
155 Accumulated Depreciation
TOTAL - FIXED ASSETS
TOTAL ASSETS
6~585.57
140.00
107.15
1,497.70
59,615.25
20,164.00
57,625.00-
8,128.42
22,152.25
50,280.67
12/06/91
11:26 AN
CHAMBER OF COMHERCE
Balance Sheet
AS OF 11/30/91
PAGE
2
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
ZURRENT LIABILITIES:
201
202
203
205
216
220
225
230
Accounts Payable-Chamber
Accounts Payable-Concert
Accounts Payable-Other
Payroll Taxes Payable
Sales Tax Payable
Loans From Officers
Mixer Deposits Payable
Note Payable #2-Overland
1,720.18
11,809.93
4,440.30
2,321.04
67.22
16,000.00
600.00
17,350.00
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
LONG TERM LIABILITIES: 241 Note Payable - Overland
245 Liability - LH Improvmts.
24,444.46
4,656.90
TOTAL - LONG TERM LIAB.
TOTAL LIABILITIES
EQUITY:
280
285
Retained Earnings
Current Earnings
TOTAL E~UITY
TOTAL LIAB. & EQUITY
54,308.67
29,101.36
62,576.89-
12,108.06
83,410.03
50,468.83-
32.941.20
t~.~ DATE: 12/06/91
IUN TIME: 11: 26 AM
CHAMBER OF COHNERCE
Balance Sheet
AS OF 11/30/91.
PaOE
ASSETS
ZURRENT ASSETS: 102 Cash in Bank - Chamber
107 Returned Checks
109 Petty Cash
110 Money Market Savings
TOTAL - CURRENT ASSETS
:IXED ASSETS: 150 Office Furniture & Eqpmt.
152 Leasehold Improvements
155 Accumulated Depreciation
TOTAL - FIXED ASSETS
TOTAL ASSETS
9,048.20
140.00
107.15
1,493.60
39,613.25
20,164.00
37,625.00-
10,788.95
22,152.25
32,941.20
"~ATE: 11/22/91
TIME: 5:31PH
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Balance Sheet
AS OF 10/31/91
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
PAGE 2
:URRENT LIABILITIES:
201
202
203
205
216
220
225
230
Accounts Payable-Chamber
Accounts Payable-Concert
Accounts Payable-Other
Payroll Taxes Payable
Sales Tax Payable
Loans From Officers
Mixer Deposits Payable
Note Payable #2-Overland
1,720 18
11,809 93
4,440 30
2,158 99
53 59
16,000 00
600.00
17,350.00
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
.ONG TERM LIABILITIES:
241 Note Payable - Overland
245 Liability - LH Improvmts.
25,555.57
5,289.78
TOTAL - LONG TERM LIAB.
TOTAL LIABILITIES
280
285
Retained Earnings
Current Earnings
TOTAL EQUITY
TOTAL LIAB. & EQUITY
54,132.99
30,845.35
84,978.34
62,576.89-
11,891.69
50,685.20-
34,293.14
UN DATE: 11/22/91
UN TIME: 5:31PM
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Bslance Sheet
AS OF 10/31/91
ASSETS
PAGE
URRENT ASSETS:
102 Cash in Bank - Chamber
105 Cash in Bank-Spec Events
107 Returned Checks
109 Petty Cash
110 Money Market Savings
TOTAL - CURRENT ASSETS
IXED ASSETS:
150 Office Furniture & Eqpmt.
152 Leasehold Improvements
155 Accumulated Depreciation
TOTAL - FIXED ASSETS
TOTAL ASSETS
8,864.40
1,539.84
140.00
107.15
1,489.50
39,613.25
20,164.00
37,625.00-
12,140.89
22,152.25
34,293.14
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECUIA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Planning Department
August 11, 1992
Monthly Report
PREPAI~-n BY:
RECOMMF-NDATION:
Discussion:
Caseload Activity:
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
Receive and File
The following is a summary of the Planning Department' s caseload
and project activity for the month of June, 1992:
The department received applications for 27 administrative cases and 7 public heating
cases. The following is a breakdown of case type for public hearing items:
* Tract Maps - Extensions of Time (4)
* Tract Maps (2)
* Substantial Conformance (1)
Ongoing Projects:
General Plan: At the June 17, 1992 joint meeting, the Commission and Council
reviewed the latest mn of the traffic model. The traffic consultant received
specific direction on alternatives to mitigate traffic impacts. The consultant
presented' the findings at the June 241h joint meeting. In addition, the Council
and commission reviewed and endorsed modifications to draft preferred land us
map.
Old Town Master Plan: Urban Design Studio (UDS) is finalizing the background
report for the Specific Plan. The next Old Town Specific Plan meeting is
presently being scheduled for mid-hte August.
S\MONTHLY.RPT~I992UUN.92 ]
French Valley Airport: The Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) consultant
is ~nalizing the draft Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plan (CLUP).
Temeeula Regional Center Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report: This
Specific Plan was presented at a Planning Commission Workshop on May 4,
1992. The Commissioners gave direction to applicant and staff. This Specific
Plan is tentatively scheduled for a September Commission hearing.
Winchester Hills and Campos Verdes Specific Plan and Environmental Impact
Report: These Specific Plans were discussed as a Workshop for the Planning
Commissioners May 4, 1992. The Planning Commissioners gave direction to the
applicant and staff. The Notice of Completion for the Campos Verdes EIR went
to State Clearinghouse July 10, 1992. Both of these Specific Plans are tentatively
scheduled for a September Commission hearing.
Roripau~h Hills Specific Plan: This Specific Plan has not yet been filed with the
Planning Department. The plan proposes to develop 800 acres at an overall
density of 3 units per acre and will contain approximately 30 acres of open space,
neighborhood commercial and two elementary schools. A pre-application
workshop on this Specific Plan was held at the July 6, 1992 Planning Commission
meeting.
Murdy Ranch Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report: This Specific Plan
was presented to the Planning Commission at a Workshop on April 6, 1992. The
Commission provided Staff and the applicant direction relative to design issues.
The applicant has incorporated these changes into the Specific Plan. This Specific
Plan is tentatively in September scheduled for the August 17, 1992 Planning
Commission meeting.
Johnson Ranch Specific Plan: The Johnson Ranch Specific Plan is a mix of
residential land uses and a mixed-use "resort village" core area on 1,765 acres
located adjacent to Anza Road and Borel Road, north of Rancho California Road.
This Specific Plan was submitted in early March. The Notice of Preparation was
submitted to State Clearinghouse on April 17, 1992. A DRC meeting was held
for this Specific Plan on May 14, 1992. A subsequent DRC date has not yet been
set.
vgw
S~iONTBLY.RPTXI99'2~UN.92 2
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official
August 11, 1992
Building and Safety June Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and File
DISCUSSION:
Building permit activity in June experienced a drastic increase over permit activity for
May. Building related permits totaled 575 as compared to 292 in May representing
building construction valuation of approximately $11,795.003. New housing starts
for the month totaled 87. The Department collected revenue totaling $117,024.
The bid period is open for the cleanup of the Pujol Public Nuisance with completion
of abatement projected for early August.
The following is an update of projects of special note that staff is currently involved
with and/or recently completed:
New Construction
Percent Completed
Advanced Cardiovascular Systems
Hungry Hunter Restaurant
Spectrum Industrial Park
5 warehouse/office- Diaz Road
Creekside Gas & Food Mart
South Front Street
Rancho California Water District Headquarters
Tamura Corporation
100%
85%
100%
100%
Grading underway
5%
This Month
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY
Monthly Activity Report For: JUNE
Last Month This Last Fiscal
Fiscal Yr/Date
Year
PLANS CHECKED:
Residential 6 6
Commercial 11 12
Industrial/W.H. I 1
Others 9 8
TOTAL: 27 27
PERHITS ISSUED:
BUILDING 200 132
Value 11,795,003 3,640,255
Fees 75,395 26,162
ELECTRICAL 146 71
Fees 17,674 5,474
PLUMBING 118 44
Fees 16,313 4,332
MECHANICAL 111 45
Fees 7,642 3,233
TOTAL PERHITS: 575 292
TOTAL FEES: 117,024 39,201
THIS MONTHS NO. OF NO/~WITS
PERHITS: PERHITS FISCAL YR
SINGLE FAHILY 87 337
DUPLEX 0 0
MULTI-FAMILY 0 5
COMMERCIAL I 23
INDUSTRIAL 0 0
RELOCATE/DEHO 0 5
SWIMMING POOLS 10 86
SIGNS 15 100
OTHER 50 1,569
ALTER/ADD
TO DWELLING 1 193
TO COMMERCIAL 14 135
TO INDUSTRIAL 0 2
TOTAL: 178 2,455
BUILDING VALUATION
This Fiscal Year to Date: 67,307,854
Last Fiscal Year to Date: 102,910,942
67 83
93 165
2 5
214 115
376 368
Last
Calendar
Yr/Date
13
74
4
28
119
1,332 1672 956
67,307,854 102,910,942 63,369,800
374,400 499,743 261,004
980 1,162 728
81,450 91,991 36,808
581 872 555
57,343 78,962 51,637
598 646 470
39,963 34,658 22,621
3,491 4,352 2,709
553,156 705,354 372,070
PLAN CHECK PERHIT FEES TOTAL FEES
FEES
11,982 93,290 105,272
0 0 0
0 0 0
989 1 , 748 2,737
0 0 0
0 0 0
863 6,325 7,188
458 1,000 1,458
2,414 3,599 6,013
This
Calandar
Yr/Da=e
30
52
2
113
197
746
40,251,319
224,064
603
49,870
412
53,058
409
26,412
2,170
353,404
VALU~ ~
10,605,164
0
0
314,I31
0
0
88,600
34,750
163,192
40,251,319
63,369,800
This Calendar Year to Date:
Last Calendar Year to Date:
31 91 122 1,791
3,107 6,980 10,087 587,375
0 0 0 0
19,844 113,033 132,877 11,795,003
APPROVAL
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FROM:
DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER
DATE:
AUGUST 11, 1992
SUBJECT:
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
PREPARED BY:
SHAWN D. NELSON, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR
A Project Committee meeting concerning the design development of the Community
Recreation Center (CRC) Project was held on July 2. The purpose of this meeting was
to finalize discussions concerning building materials, equipment requirements,
acoustical impacts, and landscaping improvements. The committee recommended
that the water slide be included in the construction documents as an alternate bid to
be considered depending upon the outcome of the public bid. Also, the CRC Project
will be divided into two construction phases: 1) Mass Grading and 2) Construction
of the CRC, Pool, and Amphitheater. The development of construction documents for
the mass grading is scheduled for public bid in September. Construction is scheduled
to begin in October.
Staff has completed the lease agreement with the Temecula Valley Unified School
District for the pool facility at Temecula Elementary School. The school will lease the
facility to the City for $1.00 per year, and the City will be responsible for the
maintenance and repairs associated with the facility. This item will be considered by
the Board of Directors on August 25.
Our new Maintenance Superintendent, Bruce Hartley, has coordinated the installation
of a temporary shade structure over one of the playground sets at the Rancho
California Sports Park. This shade structure is now installed, and our department has
received several favorable comments.
Bikeway and No Parking signs have been ordered and are currently being installed by
Public Works. The striping of the bike lanes for the Initial Bike Way Project should be
completed by the end of August.
The 1992 Summer/Fall Recreation Brochure has been bulk mailed to every resident in
the City. Several programs have been added since the winter/spring brochure. These
programs include the Teen Recreation Center programs; senior citizen programs at the
Temecula Community Center; tennis lessons; and a wide variety of special interest
classes and. excursions.
Staff is negotiating a scope of work and final price with the top ranked landscape
architectural firm for providing the design services for the Park Site on Pala Road.
Staff will bring this item to the Board of Directors for consideration once the updated
Capital Improvement Program is approved.
A meeting with the Parks and Recreation Master Plan Committee has been scheduled
for Thursday, August 13, 1992 at 5:30 p.m. at City Hall to review and comment on
the draft of the Master Plan. This committee is comprised of Pat Birdsall and Sal
Munoz from the Board of Directors; Evelyn Harker from the Parks and Recreation
Commission; and Bill Perlett, Barbara Pearson, Lettie Boggs, and Laverne Stafford
from the community. This Master Plan will then be reviewed by the Parks and
Recreation Commission, Planning Commission, and Traffic and Transportation
Commission, before final consideration by the Board of Directors.
The Rancho California Little League has completed the installation of the flag pole and
monument for Craig Lewis at the Rancho California Sports Park. Staff supervised the
installation of the flag pole, which has provided a nice amenity to the park.
Staff is also receiving cost estimates to irrigate and grass a 2.9 acre section of
parkland adjacent to Loma Linda Road in the Rainbow Canyon area. This information
will be considered by the Board of Directors during the updating process of the Capital
Improvement Program.
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY%~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Department of Public Works
August 11, 1992
Public Works Monthly Activity Report (June)
PREPARED BY: --r~'im D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Monthly Activity Report for June for the
Department of Public Works.
~0 ~ o o o o vm mo ~ o ~o
oE
Z
~ ~ w ~ ~ oo~
- u ~u z z ~ z
o ¢ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ im~w
~ ~ ~ E ~ w OOw
~ w ~ ~ ~ w
o ~ m Z mz z m z 0
0 ~ Z ~ Z~ Z Z Z
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA
ITEM
1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD JULY 14, 1992
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:13
PRESENT: 3 DIRECTORS:
ABSENT: 1 DIRECTORS:
PM.
Lindemans, Mur~oz, Parks
Birdsall, Moore
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, Assistant City Attorney John Cavanaugh and
June S. Greek, City Clerk.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Director Moore joined the meeting at 8:15 PM.
It was moved by Director Lindemans, seconded by Director Mu~oz to approve consent
calendar Items I and 2.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4 DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Moore, Mur~oz, Parks
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 1 DIRECTORS: Birdsall
4
Minutes
1.1 Approve the minutes of June 23, 1992.
AQreement for Concession Services
2.1 Approve an Agreement with Barbara Thompson of Barbie's Hot Dogs,
Etc. to provide concession services at City Facilities and Special Events
for the City of Temecula.
Minute ;/071492 - 1 - 0712OI92
CSD Minutes July 14, 1992
GENERAL MANAGER'$ REPORT
General Manager Dixon reported that there it may be possible to separate bidding for the
Community Recreation Center construction and grading, which will expedite the process and
possibly save money. He stated staff will be placing a recommendation on the CSD Agenda
in the near future.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT
None given.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
None given.
DIRECTORS REPORTS
President Parks asked for a progress report on the park site on Pala Road. Director of
Community Services Shawn Nelson, stated he met with California Landscape to receive a
rough estimate on how much it will cost to irrigate and install turf in that area and reported
this will be part of the 5 Year Capital Improvement Plan update that will be brought to the City
Council for action.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Lindemans, seconded by Director Moore to adjourn at 8:17 PM.
The motion was unanimously carried with Director Birdsall absent.
Ronald J. Parks, President
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, TCSD Secretary
Minuteel071492 -2- 07120192
TEMECULA REDVELOPMENT
AGENCY AGENDA
ITEM
1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
HELD JULY 14, 1992
A regular meeting of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 8:19 PM.
PRESENT: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Lindemans, Moore, Parks,
Mu~oz
ABSENT: I AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall
Also present were Executive Director David F. Dixon, Assistant City Attorney John Cavanaugh
and Agency Secretary June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
AGENCY BUSINESS
1. Minutes
It was moved by Member Lindemans, seconded by Member Moore to approve the
minutes of June 23, 1992. The motion was unanimously carried with Member Birdsall
absent.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Executive Director Dixon reported that President Mu~oz artended a meeting of the
Redevelopment Advisory Committee on July 7, 1992. He reported that the list was
of previously approved projects was ratified and confirmed by the Redevelopment
Advisory Committee. He stated the Committee had suggestions related to Old Town
and a time has been set aside at each meeting to discuss projects that impact Old
Town as they relate to RDA funding for that particular sub-area.
GENERAL COUNSEL'S REPORT
None given.
AGENCY MEMBERS REPORTS
None given.
4\RDAMlN\071492 -1- 07/20192
Temecula Redevelopment Agency Minutes
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Member Parks, seconded by Member Moore to adjourn at 8:21 PM.
motion was unanimously carried, with Member Birdsall absent.
July 14. 1992
The
J. Sal Mur~oz, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary
4XRDAMIN\071492 -2-