HomeMy WebLinkAbout061201 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will
enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104
ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
JUNE 12, 200'1 -7:00 P.M.
At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 11:00 P.M.
5:30 P.M. - Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to Government Code
Sections:
Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.9(a) with respect to one matter of existing litigation
involving the City. The following case will be discussed: '1) City of Temecula
v, County of Riverside, et al.
Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.8 concerning acquisition of real property located at the
intersection of Winchester Road at Murrieta Hot Springs Road (APN 956-270-
0t5, 956-270-0t6, 956-270-019). The negotiating parties are the City of
Temecula and Fairfield-Murrieta, LLC. Under negotiation is the price and terms
of the real property interests proposed to be acquired. The City negotiators
are Shawn Nelson and Jim O'Grady.
Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956,9(b)(1) with respect to two matters of potential litigation.
With respect to sUch matters, the City Attorney has determined that a point
has been reached where there is a significant exposure to litigation involving
the City based on existing facts and circumstances and the City will decide
whether to initiate litigation.
Public Information concerning existing litigation between the City and various parties
may be acquired by reviewing the public documents held by the City Clerk.
CALL TO ORDER:
Prelude Music:
invocation:
R:~Agenda\061201
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 2001-07
Resolution: No. 2001-40
Mayor Jeff Comerchero
Matthew Klm
Pastor Ron AIsobrooks of New Covenant Fellowship Center
1
Flag Salute: Boy Scout Troop # 301
ROLL CALL: Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone, Comerchero
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Friends of the Temecula Library Proclamation
Pause for the Pled,qe of Alle,qiance Day
Glass¥-win,qed Sharpshooter Update
Extreme Rec¥clinR Pro,qram
Amateur Radio Week Proclamation
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on
items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on
an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a
pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to
Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item.
There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made
at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the
agenda.
R:~Agenda\061201
2
4
5
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of March 27, 2001;
2.2 Approve the minutes of April 10, 2001;
2.3 Approve the minutes of April 17, 2001.
Resolution approvin,q List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 0t-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 2001.
Approval of Election Resolutions
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 0t-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA REQUESTING THE SERVICES OF THE COUNTY
REGISTRAR OF VOTERS TO CONDUCT THE GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY,
NOVEMBER 6, 2001
5.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING
OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2001, FOR THE ELECTION OF
CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF
THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO
GENERAL LAW CITIES
R:~Agenda\061201
3
6
7
8
Back-up Generator System for City Hall
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Award a contract in the amount of $106,200 to Johnson Power Systems for the
design, construction, and installation of a 250 kW back-up generator system for City
Hall;
6.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed $10,620 which
is equal to 10% of the contract amount;
6.3 Appropriate Capital Project Reserves in the amount of $116,820.
Consideration of the Temecula Fall Rod Run - Hot Rods and Hadeys Cruising for the Boy
Scouts Sponsorship Request
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Approve the sponsorship request for the Temecula Fall Rod Run - Hot Rods and
Harleys Cruising for the Boy Scouts event.
Implementation of Special Tax - Measure C
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE AMOUNT OF THE SPECIAL
TAX LEVY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 TO FINANCE
RECREATIONAL AND HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAMS AND
THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, SERVICING OF PUBLIC
PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, MEDIAN
LANDSCAPING, AND ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTS, AND
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
Resolution adopting FY 2001/2002 Solid Waste Rates
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE SOLID WASTE RATES FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002
R:~Agenda\061201
4
10 Cost-Sharinq Agreement with County of Riverside for Date/Cherry Flyover Property
Acquisition
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Approve an agreement with Riverside County to share the costs of acquiring right-
of-way for the Date/Cherry Flyover project.
11 Roripau,qh Specific Plan - Status Report
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Receive and file.
12 Approval of Funds for Plan Review Services with Es,qil Corporation
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Approve an expenditure in an amount not to exceed $25,000.00 for Plan Check
Services with Esgil Corporation.
13 Annual Adjustment of Development Impact Fees
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 0l-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA CONFIRMING THE ADJUSTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 200t-02
TO BE EFFECTIVE AUGUST 13, 2001, PURSUANT TO
CHAPTER 15.06 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AND
RESOLUTION NOS. 97-94 AND 98-30
14 Approval of the Plans and Specifications and authorization to solicit bids for the Starliqht
Rid.qe Southern Cross Road Sidewalk Project - Project No, PW00-22
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Make a finding that the Starlight Ridge Southern Cross Road Sidewalk Project is
categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15301(c) of the CEQA
guidelines;
14.2 Approve the plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works
to solicit public construction bids for the Starlight Ridge Southern Cross Road
Sidewalk Project - Project No. PW00-22,
R:~Agenda\061201
5
15 Parcel Map No. 29949 (located at the easterly terminus of Lolita Road - in an urbanized
area of Los Ranchitos)
16
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Approve Parcel Map No. 29949 in conformance with the conditions of approval;
15.2 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement;
15.3 Accept the Performance Bond for improvements as security for the Monument
Agreement.
Parcel Map No. 30012 (located at the southeast corner of North General Kearny Road
17
and Margarita Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Approve Parcel Map No. 30012 in conformance with the conditions of approval;
16.2 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Monument Deposit
as security for the agreement.
Acceptance of a Declaration of Dedication of an Easement for Date Street Storm Drain
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING A DECLARATION OF DEDICATION
OF STORM DRAIN EASEMENT ON THE SOUTH SIDE DATE
STREET AT A POINT 697 FEET EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD
BUT NOT ACCEPTING THIS EASEMENT INTO THE CITY-
MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM AT THIS TIME
18 Acceptance of Grant of Easement for Date Street Right-of-Way
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR
PUBLIC STREET AND ROADWAY PURPOSES ON THE
SOUTH SIDE DATE STREET BETWEEN MARGARITA ROAD
AND A POINT 697 FEET EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD BUT
NOT ACCEPTING THIS EASEMENT INTO THE CITY-
MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM AT THIS TIME
R:~Agenda\061201
6
19 Acceptance of Offer of Dedication - Road Purposes on Western Bypass Corridor and
Front Street per Tentative Parcel Map No. 28627 Conditions of Approval
20
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING AN OFFER OF DEDICATION OF
RIGHT OF WAY FOR ROAD PURPOSES FOR WESTERN
BYPASS CORRIDOR AND FRONT STREET AS REQUIRED BY
THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR PARCEL MAP NO.
28627, PA97-0307, BUT NOT ACCEPTING STREETS INTO THE
CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM AT THIS TIME
Acceptance of an Easement Deed for a Meanderinq S dewalk alon,q North General
Kearney Road with portions within Parcel E of Lot Line Adjustment PA98-0054 (located at
the southeast corner of North General Kearney Road and Mar,qar ta Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED FOR A
MEANDERING SIDEWALK ALONG NORTH GENERAL
KEARNEY ROAD WITH PORTIONS WITHIN PARCEL E OF
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PA98-0054 AS REQUIRED PER THE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA00-0417
21 Reimbursement Aqreements with MS Temecula II, LLC - Dend¥ Parkway Improvement.,;.
and Diaz Road Traffic Si.qna nsta lation
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1 Execute an Agreement between the City and MS Temecula II, LLC for
Reimbursement of the Cost of Constructing Improvements within Dendy Parkway;
21.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT
ENTITLED AGREEMENT FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS
OF CONSTRUCTION FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS (DENDY
PARKWAY) BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND MS
TEMECULA II, LLC (PA00-0355)
R:~,genda\061201
7
21.3 Execute an Agreement between the City and MS Temecula II, LLC for
Reimbursement of the Cost of Installing a Traffic Signal at Winchester and Diaz
Road;
21.4 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT
ENTITLED REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR
WINCHESTER ROAD/DIAZ ROAD TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS
BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND MS TEMECULA II, LLC
22
Tract Map Nos. 24136, 24136-2, 24136-3, 24187 (located north of De Portola Road, west
of Meadows Parkway, east of Margarita Road, and south of Pio Pico, Montele.qro, and
Leena Way and within Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan No. 219 - now in conformance with
their original approvals
RECOMMENDATION:
22.1 Approve Tract Map Nos. 24136, 24136-2, 24136-3, 24187 in conformance with the
conditions of approval;
22.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreements;
22.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreements and accept the Faithful
Performance Bonds, Labor and Material Bonds, and Monument Bonds as security
for the agreements.
23 Second Readin,q of Ordinance No. 01-06 (Loud or unruly assemblies)
RECOMMENDATION:
23.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 01-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 9.18 TO THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING LIABILITY TO PERSONS
WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOUD OR UNRULY
ASSEMBLIES WHICH CAUSE DISTURBANCES OF THE
PEACE AND PROVIDING FOR RECOVERY OF LAW
ENFORCEMENT COSTS IN CONNECTION WITH SUCH
ASSEMBLIES
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF
THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT,
THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
AND
THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
R:~Agenda\061201
8
CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Stone
ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS:
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. CSD 2001-01
Resolution: No. CSD 2001-08
Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of
Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to
Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of March 27, 2001;
1.2 Approve the minutes of April 10, 2001.
Inclusion of Tracts into Service Level B and Acceptance of Slope Easement Areas
into Service Level C for Fiscal Year 2001-2007
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R:~Agenda\061201
9
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACCEPTING
CERTAIN TRACTS INCLUDING VAIL RANCH INTO TCSD
SERVICE LEVEL B FOR PURPOSES OF ENERGIZING
RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTS BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR
2001-2002
2.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVCIES DISTRICT ACCEPTING
CERTAIN SLOPE AND LANDSCAPE AREAS WITHIN
VARIOUS TRACTS INCLUDING VAIL RANCH INTO SERVICE
LEVEL C FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSES BEGINNING
FISCAL YEAR 200'1-2002
2.3
Authorize the City Clerk/District Secretary to record the slope easement
Documents.
3
Amendment to the Landscape Maintenance Contract with Excel Landscape, Inc.
For FY2001-02
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Approve the Landscape Maintenance Services Contract Amendment with
Excel Landscape, Inc. to extend the term of the Agreement to June 30, 2003 to
allow for the addition of supplemental landscape maintenance areas and
establish set prices for the addition of unforeseen areas;
3.2
Authorize the expenditure of funds in the amount of $1,106,100 for the base
contract and an additional amount not to exceed $32,200 for the supplemental
and new areas that may be brought on line during the term of the contract;
3.3 Approve a contingency of 10% in the amount of $114,000 for extra work items.
PUBLIC HEARING
Any person may submit written comments to the Community Services District
before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition
to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
projects in courts, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered
to the City clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.
4 TCSD Proposed Rates and Charqes for F scal Year 2001-2002
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R:~Agenda\061201
10
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING
RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL B -
RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING, SERVICE LEVEL C -
SLOPE MAINTENANCE, AND SERVICE LEVEL D -
RECYCLING AND REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICES FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002
4.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING
RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL R - STREET
AND ROAD MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR
2001-2002
DISTRICT BUSINESS
Convene a Joint meeting with the City Council and Community Services District
5
Adoption of Annexation A.qreements between the City of Temecula and the
County of Riverside for Median Maintenance (Agreement No. 1), Tax Reimbursement
(Agreement No. 2), and Sales Tax Revenue Sharinq in association with the finalization of
the Vail Ranch Annexation (PA00-0021/
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 That the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT APPROVING
THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED VAIL RANCH
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT NO. t (MEDIAN MAINTENANCE
AGREEMENT) BETVVEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT AND THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
5.2 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 0'1-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT
ENTITLED VAIL RANCH ANNEXATION AGREEMENT NO. 2
(TAX REIMBURSEMENT) BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AND THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
R:~Agenda\061201
11
5.3 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT
ENTITLED SALES TAX REVENUE SHARING AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF
TEMECULA (FIRST DISTRICT)
Recess City Council Meeting
6 Review and Adoption of the FY 2001-2002 Annual Operating BudRet
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 0'1-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING
THE FY 2001-02 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND
ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN
APPROPRIATIONS
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Tuesday, June 26, 2001, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\061201
12
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. RDA 2001-01
Resolution: No. RDA 2001-03
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ron Roberts
ROLLCALL
AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the
Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent
Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the
Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of March 27, 2001;
1.2 Approve the minutes of April 10, 2001.
2
First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement w th Fisher Merriman Seh,qal
Yanez, Inc.
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Amend the Professional Services Agreement with Fisher Merriman Sehgal
Yanez, Inc. for the final design of the Old Town Community Theater in the
amount of $420,000;
R:~Agenda\061201
13
2.2 Approve a 10% contingency in the amount of $42,000.
AGENCY BUSINESS
3 Review and Adoption of the FY 2001-2002 Annual Operatin.q Bud.qet
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 0t-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TIlE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE FY 2001-02 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET
AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN
APPROPRIATIONS
4
Review and Approval of the FY 2002-2006 Capital Improvement Bud,qet for th~,
Redevelopment Agency (RDA)
Recommendation
4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY
2002-06 AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
BUDGET FOR FY 2001-02
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Tuesday, June 26, 2001, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\061201
14
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. TPFA 2001-01
Resolution: No. TPFA 2001-04
CALL TO ORDER: Chairman JeffComerchero
ROLL CALL
BOARDMEMBERS:
Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone, Comerchero
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Temecula
Public Financing Authority on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent
Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the
Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
Convene a Joint Meeting of the City Council and the Temecula Public Financing
Authority
AUTHORITY BUSINESS
1 Actions relating to Acceptance of a Deposit related to proceedinqs for a Community
Facilities District for Harveston
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING DEPOSIT/REIMBURSEMENT
AGREEMENT
R:~Agenda\061201
15
1.2 That the Authority adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF A DEPOSIT RELATIVE TO
THE FORMATION OF A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING ACTIONS WITH
RESPECT THERETO
Recess the City Council meeting
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
R:~Agenda\061201
16
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL BUSINESS
24 Review and Adoption of the FY 2001-002 Annual Operatin.q Bud,qet
RECOMMENDATION:
24.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FY 200'1-02 ANNUAL
OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON
CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS
24.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 0'I-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED
POSITIONS
24.3 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
FOR FY 200'1-02
25 Adoption of the FY 2002-06 Capital Improvement Pro,qram
RECOMMENDATION:
25.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 0t-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM FOR FY 2002-06 AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FY 200t-02
26 Community Advisory Committee for the General Plan Update Proces,~
RECOMMENDATION:
26.1 Provide direction to staff concerning the structure, membership, and role of a
Community Advisory Committee.
R:~Agenda\061201
17
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: City Council, Tuesday, June 26, 2001, at 7:00 P.M., City Council
Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\061201
18
PROCLAMATIONS
AND
PRESENTATIONS
ITEM 1
ITEM 2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
MARCH 27, 2001
The City Council convened in Closed Session at 6:00 P.M. and convened in a regular meeting
at 7:02 P.M., on Tuesday, March 27, 2001, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City
Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Present:
Councilmembers: Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone*, Comerchero
Absent: Councilmember: None
* - Councilman Stone arrived at 7:38 P.M.
PRELUDE MUSIC
The prelude music was provided by Eve Craig.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor Gary Nelson of Calvary Chapel of Temecula.
ALLEGIANCE
The salute to the Flag was led by Mayor Pro Tern Roberts.
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Supervisor Bob Buster re,qardinq Homeless Shelters
Commenting on the humane and cooperative approach necessary to address this issue, First
District County Supervisor Buster provided information with regard to homeless programs,
referencing specific issues and statistics; advising that such a program should be included as
part of the Housing Element; noting that the County currently spends $5 million on homeless
issues but stated that the current programs are not effective and that no specific system is in
place; and requesting City assistance from a location standpoint and that a Committee be
formed to address the homeless issue in the Temecula/Murrieta area.
Based on various factors, Ms. Susan Lowe, Deputy Director for Department of Social Services,
further reviewed statistics relative to the need for emergency shelters.
Mr. Bill Denzmar, County Veteran Services Officer, further elaborated on the need for homeless
housing and commented on the need for the County to set realistic goals and the assistance
needed from the cities to achieve those goals.
Councilman Naggar suggested that the formation of a Committee to address this issue be
agendized for a future City Council meeting.
Mayor Comerchero expressed appreciation to Supervisor Buster for enlightening the City
Council on this important issue.
R:\Minutes\032701
1
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A. Desirous of improving and upgrading existing parks in the La Serena Homeowners
Association, Ms. Nicole Steen and Ms. Miriam Parsan, 3114 Camino Del Este, requested
funding assistance from the City.
Although the parks of discussion are not public parks and are, therefore1 not maintained
by the City, Mayor Comerchero requested that Community Services Director Parker address the
matter and noted that the Association may qualify for Community Services Grant Funding.
B. Mr. David Rosenthal, 27315 Jefferson Street, representing Southwest Riverside
Manufactures Council, informed the City Council that the Public Utilities Commission has voted
to raise electricity rates by 40%, noting that letters have been written in opposition to this
increase; commented on the impacts this increase will have on the manufactures in the area as
well as jobs; and requested that letters be written to the Governor to reflect the City Council's
dismay with the approved rate increase.
C. Ms. Adrienne McGregor, 34555 Madera de Playa, requested that City staff explore the
use of solar units during this energy situation.
D. Addressing AB 939 0Naste Reduction 1989), Ms. Charlotte Fox, 32800 Hupa Drive,
commended the City on exceeding its waste reduction goal. Ms. Fox, as well, applauded the
City on its efforts to preserve open space, public parks, and the development of a master
planned Multi-use Trails System in addition to other public works issues; commented on the
need for additional education regarding home composting, efficient gardening, and land care
techniques as it relates to water conservation measures; advised that the Gardening Friends of
Southwest County are assisting in schools and homes with planned gardening classes; and that
a Junior Master Gardeners program will be introduced by the Friends in the near future.
Supporting the garden classes at schools, Councilman Naggar relayed his desire of a
community garden.
E. Commenting on the need for homeless shelters, Mr. Chuck Washington, Solana Way,
relayed his support of Supervisor Buster's vision to provide emergency homeless shelters in the
Valley and noted that such goals cannot be achieved without the collaborative efforts of many.
F. Mr. Mark Mush, 31731 Corte Avalos, applauded the City Clerk for denying the submitted
petitions with regard to Wolf Creek and further addressed and questioned communications
between Ms. Pamela Miod and Councilman Pratt with regard to a Closed Session item.
G. Councilman Naggar noted that each City Council agenda item reflects Closed Session
items.
H. Ms. Maryann Edwards, 42913 Calle Londe, representing the Theater Foundation, invited
the City Councilmembers and the public to An Evening of Arts and Stars, on Friday, March 30,
2001, 6:00 P.M. - 9:00 P.M., at Jack's Gallery in Old Town, noting that the event is free and that
25% of all proceeds from the Gallery will benefit the Theater Foundation.
I. Mr. Ed Dool, 28464 Old Town Front Street, thanked and commended the City Council
and the Old Town merchants on a successful Blue Grass Festival, requesting such functions in
Old Town on a quarterly or monthly basis.
R:~Vlinutes\032701
2
J. Echoing Mr. Dool's comments, Ms. Judi Steffen, 28475 - B Old Town Front Street,
commented on the successful Blue Grass Festival and as well recommended the scheduling of
more such events.
K. To ensure that the unfortunate individuals in need are assisted, Mr. Chris Pedersen
31052 Wellington Circle, relayed his support of Supervisor Buster's vision.
With regard to the signing of petitions relative to Wolf Creek, Mr. Pederson commented
in his opinion, on Councilman Stone's inappropriate action by affixing a name, not his own, on
petition and then crossing it out solely for the purpose to view the petition.
L. Ms. Michelle Anderson, 43797 Badetta Street, representing Citizens First of Temecula
Valley, extended her thanks and appreciation to Mr. Pedersen for his efforts associated with the
Wolf Creek referendum; as well extended appreciation to Councilmembers Naggar and Pratt for
denying the project; and as well relayed appreciation to the new members of Citizens First of
Temecula Valley who volunteered their time and effort during the signature-gathering process.
M. With regard to the outcome of the Wolf Creek referendum, Mr. Carl Ross, 43886
Butternut Drive, noted that 5,000 citizens of the City of Temecula have been silenced and that it
has eliminated the opportunity to debate issues of this project.
N. In response to City Clerk Jones, Mayor Comerchero advised that he had spoken to Mr.
Morris and apprised him that it generally is not the City Council's policy to read letters into the
record on non-agendized items but noted that his letter would be placed into the record.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Having participated in a recent Celebrity luncheon, Councilman Naggar advised that he
had raised $1,000 for the Rotary High School scholarship because of generous donations made
by tocal merchants, including the developer of Temecula Village Apartments. Mr. Naggar
thanked each business and the developer for the donations.
B. Commenting on the proposed route of the transmission lines, Councilman Naggar
expressed concern with the route; noted that the submitted maps of the proposed route make it
difficult to determine the impact to the City of Temecula; requested that the matter be agendized
for the Electrical Needs Subcommittee (Mayor Comerchero/Councilman Naggar) or that a
committee be formed to address this issue; stated that he would prefer a route through the
Pechanga Indian reservation; and noted that a route through the winery could threaten the
City's tourism.
Mr. Naggar noted that in addition to the recent 42% increase authorized by the Public
Utilities Commission, the Commission had already approved a 15% increase in January and as
well approved a 10% increase for next year which should as well be addressed by the Electrical
Needs Subcommittee.
In light of the City of Murrieta's action to impose campaign spending limits, Councilman
Naggar suggested that this matter be agendized for City Council review at the next meeting.
For Mayor Comerchero, City Attorney Thorson advised that several years ago, a Political
Reform Initiative was passed and the City had adopted a voluntary campaign expenditure limit;
that the proposition was challenged and that since then, no policy is in place for the City with
regard to spending limitations; and that the City of Murrieta's adopted ordinance will be
reviewed.
R:'~Minutes\032701
3
C. Mayor Pro Tem Roberts confirmed that the City will receive $2.7 million in State
Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funding for the Butterfield Stage Road four-lane
arterial extension beltway project.
D. Having attended the recent Student of the Month recognition luncheon, Councilman
Pratt relayed the students' appreciation of City Council recognition.
E. Councilman Pratt encouraged public participation at the Public/Traffic Safety
Commission meetings.
F. With regard to the electricity crisis, Councilman Stone noted that the situation is a State-
wide catastrophe in the making and encouraged the citizens to voice their concerns to
Sacramento.
In response to Mr. Pederson's comments with regard to Wolf Creek, Councilman Stone
noted that the circulated petitions did not emphasize the $18 million provided by the developer
for public infrastructure, the $12 million for schools, the 40-acre sports park, the $400,000 for
public art, etc. In his opinion, Mr. Stone stated that the individuals signing the petition did not
receive accurate information and commented on the negative impacts of the no growth
philosophy.
Councilman Stone advised and invited the public to a Sports Park Meeting, on Saturday,
April 7, 2001, at 9:00 A.M., at City Hall, in the City Council Chambers.
G. Mayor Comerchero informed the public that the SR 79 South project should be
completed by April 17, 2001.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the
agenda.
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of January 9, 2001;
2.2 Approve the minutes of the January 16, 2001, RCIP Workshop.
3 Resolution Approvin.q List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R:\Minutes\032701
4
RESOLUTION NO. 01-21
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
4
Professional Services Aqreement - Diaz Road Extension and Ali,qnment Study - Prelect No.
PW00-10
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Approve the agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to provide
professional engineering services for the Alignment Study for the extension of Diaz
Road to the City limits and a bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek - Project No.
PW00-10 - for an amount not to exceed $167,101.00 and authorize the Mayor to
execute the agreement;
4.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve amendments not to exceed the contingency
amount of 10% of the contract or $16,710.10.
5 SB 332 Beveraqe Container Recyclin.q and Litter Abatement Fundin.q Request
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-22
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AUTHORIZING ANY ANNUAL SUBMITTAL OF A
FUNDING REQUEST FOR A SB 332 BEVERAGE CONTAINER
RECYCLING AND LITTER ABATEMENT GRANT
6
Tract No. 23209 - Subdivision Aqreement (located at the easterly extension of La Seren~
Way at Butterfield Sta.qe Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve the Subdivision Agreement and accept the Performance Bond security to
guarantee the performance of the SUBDIVIDER under this agreement.
(At staff's request, Item No. 6 was pulled off calendar.)
7 Completion and Acceptance for Overland Drive Overcrossinq at Interstate Route 15 -
Proiect No. PW95-11
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Accept the Overland Drive Overcrossing Project at Interstate Route 15 - Project No.
PW95-11 as complete;
7.2 File a Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year
Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
R:\Minutes\032701
5
7.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven months after filing of the Notice of
Completion if no liens have been filed.
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-5 and 7 (item
No. 6 pulled off calendar). The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts and voice
voted reflected approval with the exception of Councilman Stone who abstained with regard to
item No. 2.2.
At 8:17 PM., Mayor Comerchero called a recess and then convened as the Community
Services District and the Redevelopment Agency and reconvened the City Council meeting at
8:30 P.M.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
8 Morgan Hill Specific Plan No. 313
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
Formally adopt the attached recommended Condition of Approval for the Morgan
Hill Specific Plan traffic mitigation measure for presentation to the Riverside County
Board of Supervisors;
8.2
Endorse the creation of an Urban Limit Line within the unincorporated territory of
Riverside County east of the Morgan Hill Specific Plan and direct staff to prepare a
map of said line for approval by the Council and subsequent submittal to the County
Board of Supervisors.
By way of overheads, Deputy City Manager Thornhill reviewed the staff report (as per agenda
material), clarifying that the City is not recommending approval of Morgan Hill project but is
recommending that if the project were approved by the County, conditions be imposed relative
to the mitigation of City traffic impacts ($1.5 million) and that the County establish an urban
growth boundary to the east of the project site, thereby, preventing the construction of
thousands of residential units which are currently proposed for approval by the County and
noting that the implementation of urban growth boundaries would be consistent with the City's
Management Plan. Mr. Thornhill advised that Supervisor Buster is requesting that the City
Council take a formal position on this matter and that the Council's position be forwarded to the
County prior to the April 10, 2001, Board of Supervisor's meeting.
In response to Councilman Naggar, Deputy City Manager Thornhill noted the following with
regard to the Morgan Hill project:
· That the current zoning on the property of discussion is agriculture
· That urban limit line defines the extent of urban development beyond a
particular line; 5- to 10-acre parcels define urban and rural
· That Morgan Hill is a County project, not a City project
That the southerly extension of Butterfield Stage Road will bisect the
property and will ultimately intersect with the southerly extension of Anza
Road
R:'dVlinutes\032701
6
· That the density decreases in the City have made an impact on the Level of
Service
· That Staff's recommendation is consistent with the direction given by the City
Council.
Reiterating that this is not a City project, Mayor Pro Tern Roberts commented on the City's
intent to impose specific conditions on a County project.
Councilman Pratt suggested that legal action against the County be explored and commented
on the cumulative traffic impacts this project will have on the City.
Reiterating that staff had followed City Council direction as it relates to this project, Councilman
Stone noted that in the past, the City has never had the opportunity to impose a condition on a
County project.
In response to Mayor Comerchero, Public Works Director Hughes stated that he would
anticipate the intersections at Bedford Court and La Paz Road, with Wolf Creek and Morgan
Hill, to operate at Level of Service D or better at peak hours for at least the next 10 years, noting
that beyond that time frame, it would be difficult to estimate.
Public Input
With the development of Wolf Creek and Morgan Hill, Mr. Ed Dool, 28464 Old Town Front
Street, noted that an additional 8,000 daily trips will be added to SR 79; relayed his support of
SMART growth; and opposed the City's recommendation to the County to approve this project.
Mr. Chris Pedersen, 31052 Wellington Circle, stated that the approval of Morgan Hill would be
the approval of an upzone; that the requested $1.5 million would not solve the issues of
concern; and that the County should not be approving this project until the completion of the
Riverside County Integrated Program.
Ms. May Lorah, 35555 Monte De Oro, stated that Mr. Lowry has a special interest in the Morgan
Hill project and questioned whether Mayor Comerchero and Mayor Pro Tem Roberts should be
voting on this project considering they received campaign contributions from three individuals
involved with the Morgan Hill project.
Because individuals involved with the Morgan Hill project have contributed to Mayor
Comerchero's and Mayor Pro Tem Roberts's reelection campaigns, Mr. Carl Ross, 43886
Butternut, noted that them voting on this project would create a sense of impropriety.
For Mr. Ross, Councilman Stone clarified that the City Council, this evening, will not be voting
on the approval/disapproval of this project, noting that if it were a City project, the City would be
voting no on the project but that the issue is whether or not to endorse the imposition of a City
condition requesting $1.5 million if the project were approved.
Because this project is not within the sphere of influence, Mayor Pro Tern Roberts reiterated
that the Morgan Hill project is not a City project and that the developer of this County project is
willing to give the City $1.5 million for traffic impacts.
Although an individual(s) involved with the Morgan Hill project has contributed to his and Mayor
Pro Tern Roberts' reelection campaigns, Mayor Comerchero clarified that the City is requesting
that the project developer be required to pay the City $1.5 million.
R:\Minutes\032701
7
Mr. Bob Canfield, 31041 Wellington Circle, stated that the residents of the City of Temecula
would be willing to pay the $1.5 million versus the approval of this project.
City Council discussion
Noting that if it were a City project, he would vote no on the project because it would not comply
with the City's Growth Management Plan, Councilman Stone reiterated that the issue before the
City Council, this evening, is if the County were to approve the project, it be approved with a
condition whereby the City would receive $1.5 million to mitigate project impacts.
By way of overheads, Councilman Naggar referenced the adopted 1993 Traffic Circulation
Element as well as the 1999 traffic study, noting that the $1.5 million would not make a
difference when specific corridors along SR 79 are functioning at a Level of Service F.
Commenting on the agreed-upon urban limit line, as per Supervisor Buster, Mayor Pro Tern
Roberts noted that the City Council subcommittee negotiated, with City Council support, the
matter, questioning why the support has changed.
Not favoring upzones, Councilman Pratt noted that the City should pursue legal action.
Echoing comments made by Councilman Stone, Mayor Comerchero reiterated that the issue,
this evening, is if the County were to approve this project, it be approved with a condition
whereby the City would receive $1.5 million to mitigate traffic impacts. Concurring with Mr.
Stone, Mr. Comerchero noted that if this project were in the City, he would not be in support of
it.
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve staff recommendation and relayed the City
Council's opposition to the County approving this project but if it were approved by the County,
a condition be imposed requiring the developer to pay $1.5 million to the City of Temecula for
public infrastructure prior to the issuance of any building permit. The motion was seconded by
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman
Naggar and Councilman Pratt who voted no.
9 Rules of Order for Conduct of City Council Meetinqs
(At the request of Councilman Naggar)
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Provide direction to staff whether to amend Resolution No. 94-79 regarding rules of
order for conduct at City Council Meetings.
City Clerk Jones referenced the staff report (of record).
Viewing throe minutes as an unroalistic time limit to properly address an issue, Councilman
Naggar stated that with such a time rostriction, the people of this City aro not properly
roprosented by the City Council. In his opinion, Mr. Naggar noted that this rule is being imposed
in order to silence him. Mr. Naggar addrossed comments made by Mayor Comerchero and
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts in the newspapers rogarding this issue.
At 9:18 P.M., Mayor Comerchero called a recess and reconvened the City Council meeting at
9:24 P.M.
Wishing to further address this particular item, Councilman Naggar offered the following motion:
R:\Minutes\032701
8
MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to extend his time by an additional three minutes. The
motion was seconded by Councilman Pratt and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
Mayor Comerchero advised that, as Mayor of this City Council, it would be his responsibility to
enforce Resolution No. 94-79, noting that the resolution may be revised but until such time, the
resolution is in effect.
Councilman Naggar reiterated his concern with comments made by Mayor Comerchero and
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts in the newspapers regarding this issue and requested that the time
restriction of three minutes be eliminated.
Although having been restricted himself by this rule, Councilman Stone spoke in support of it,
noting that it has required him to receive more information from staff and ask more questions
regarding issues prior to a City Council meeting. Mr. Stone relayed his opposition to the
continual discussion of same issues and, thereby, directing staff to research issues which may
not have received majority direction from the City Council; that such action wastes staff time and
as well confuses staff which, in turn, will confuse the public doing business with the City of
Temecula; and that there are other important issues which need to be addressed by the City.
Mr. Stone as well noted that the time restriction would limit the lateness of City Council
meetings.
Providing background information as to initial adoption of this resolution, Mayor Pro Tem
Roberts commented on a similar resolution from the City of Murrieta, limiting debate time to five
minutes and suggested that the City's time be increased from three minutes to five minutes.
Public input
Mr. Chris Pedersen, 31052 Wellington Circle, commented on the meaninglessness of such a
time restriction; stated that this rule hasn't been enforced in the past; and noted that it inhibits
public participation.
Ms. May Lorah, 35555 Monte De Oro, stated that, in her opinion, the powerful majority of this
City Council has displayed a pattern of silencing and that limiting the City Councilmembers to
three minutes limits proper public representation.
Noting that in three minutes he is unable to communicate his point of view on a matter,
Councilman Naggar stated that this matter has nothing to do with being prepared or not being
prepared for a City Council meeting, the issue is that the three-minute rule hinders public
participation.
Commenting on an incident whereby the City Council gave direction to a subcommittee but
when the matter was discussed on public session, certain City Councilmembers spoke in
opposition of the original direction, Mr. Stone reiterated his support of the three-minute rule in
order to ensure that allotted time will be appropriately used and as well be in the best interest of
the City.
Mayor Pro Tern Roberts reiterated that increasing the time limit to five minutes could correspond
with the City of Murrieta's policy.
Mayor Comerchero relayed his support of Mayor Pro Tem Roberts' recommendation to increase
the time limit to five minutes, noting that business meetings must be concise and controlled in
order to be effective and that the City Councilmembers must take measures to ensure proper
preparation for upcoming City Council meetings.
R:\Minutes\032701
9
MOTION: Mayor Comerchero moved to amend Section 2 B 1 and 2 of Resolution No. 94-79
by increasing the time limit from three minutes to five minutes. The motion was seconded by
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts and the following voice vote reflected denial of the motion:
AYES:
Comerchero, Roberts
NOES: Naggar, Stone
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Pratt
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to uphold the three-minute time limit as per Resolution No.
94-79. The motion was seconded by Mayor Comerchero and roll call vote reflected approval of
the motion as follows:
AYES:
Comerchero, Roberts, Stone
NOES: Naggar, Pratt
10 Public/Traffic Safety Commission Meetinq Schedule Revision
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Approve modification of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting schedule to
one regular meeting per month.
10.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 0'1-23
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE MEETING SCHEDULE OF THE
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
10.3 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance:
ORDINANCE NO. 01-05
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION NO. 2.40.'100 OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO MONTHLY
COMPENSATION FOR CITY COMMISSIONERS
Public Works Director Hughes reviewed the staff report (of record), confirming that the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission concurs with staff's recommendation.
In response to Councilman Stone, Public/Traffic Safety Chairwoman Edwards reiterated that
the Commission concurs with staff's recommendation to amend the Commission meeting
schedule to one meeting a month and advised that if a special meeting were necessary, it
could be scheduled at any time.
Councilman Pratt commended the Commission on a job well done.
R:\Minutes\032701
10
MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to approve 10.1 and 10.2 of the staff recommendation,
including the adoption of Resolution No. 01-23. The motion was seconded by Mayor
Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
City Attorney Thorson introduced and read by title only Ordinance No. 01-05.
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to introduce and read by title only Ordinance No. 01-05
(10.3). The motion was seconded by Councilman Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
No additional comments.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
No comment.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
City Attorney Thorson advised that there were no reportable actions under the Brown Act for
Closed Session.
ADJOURNMENT
At 9:53 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, April 10, 2001, at
7:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:\Minutes\032701
11
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF
THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 10, 2001
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecuia City Council convened in a regular meeting at 7:00 P.M., on
Tuesday, April 10, 2001, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hail, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Councilmembers:
Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone,
and Mayor Comerchero.
Absent: Counciimember: None.
PRELUDE MUSIC
The prelude music was provided by Mr. Kurt Jordan.
INVOCATION.
The invocation was given by Reverend Howard Brown of Winchester United Methodist
Church.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Councilman Stone.
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Buildin.q & Safety Week Proclamation
Noting the request for this week to be designated as International Building and Safety
Week, Chief Building Official Elmo relayed that this would be an opportunity for building
depadments across the United States to let people know what the function of the
building department is, and to reduce the perceptions of the bureaucratic barriers so
often associated with the building process; noted the lack of information the public has
regarding the duties of a building official; advised that the California Building Officials
have partnered with the California Building Industry Association in developing a video to
provide information regarding the role of building officials, noting that the film was almost
entirely filmed in the City of Temecula, and would be shown to 540 member jurisdictions
throughout the United States; and presented the informative video, which highlighted
how building safety affects our daily lives, the building official's process which includes
Planning, Fire, and Public Works Engineering, and the building officials responsibilities
during emergency situations (i.e., assessing earthquake damage.)
In recognition of the Building and Safety Week, Deputy Building Official Harold provided
an overview of the activities the City of Temecula's Department of Building and Safety
would be involved with, or host, highlighting the biannual meeting held with developers in
R:\Minutes\041001 I
the community on April 10th, the extension of hours in the Building Department on April
11th until 7:00 P.M., scheduled in order to provide homeowners an evening opportunity
to access the Building Department, the April 12th training program for the inspection
staff, the hosting (in conjunction with Southern California Edison) of the May Update
Seminar for local design professionals, energy consultants, and engineers; advised that
per comments from customers, procedural changes have been implemented to better
serve the builders in the community, specifying the revised processes and procedures
which have resulted in improved building permit and inspection procedures; and relayed
that an updated plan check status was now available on the City's website.
Mayor Comerchero read into the record the Proclamation of the City of Temecula,
proclaiming the week of April 8-14, 2001 to be "International Building Safety Week;" and
commended Chief Building Official Elmo, and Deputy Building Official Harold, for their
diligent efforts in the Building Department.
Public Health Month Proclamation
Proclaiming the month of April, 2001, to be "National Public Health Month," Mayor
Comerchero read into the record the proclamation of the City of Temecula.
California Parks and Recreation Society Awards Presentation
A representative from the California Parks and Recreation Society (CPRS) presented
several prestigious awards which had been bestowed on the City of Temecula at the
March 17th Annual Awards and Installation Banquet held in Sacramento, advising that
while it was commendable for a city to receive one award, that the City of Temecula's
achievements have been quite an accomplishment; presented the awards, as follows: 1)
An Award of Merit in the category of marketing theme campaigning for the Temecula
Valley Museum, 2) An Award of Merit in the category of personal development for the
Temecula High Hopes Program, noting that the highest award was an Award of
Excellence, presenting, 3) An Award of Excellence in the category of best single
brochure for the Summer/Fall Leisure Guide to Activities, and 4) An Award of Excellence
in the category of media communications for the High Hopes Program Video; and
congratulated the City Council and their outstanding Community Services Department
staff who provide these quality programs and services in the great community of
Temecula.
Relaying gratitude for the presentation of the awards, Mayor Comerchero noted that this
was yet another tribute to the staff, noting the continued amazement at the quality of
work of the Temecula departmental staff.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mr. Jack Henz, 43009 Manchester Court, relayed that her was speaking on behalf of Felicia
Hogan, the Program Coordinator for the Temecula Valley Garden Club, which was
presenting its 16th Annual Flower Show and Plant Sale on April 28th from 11:00 A.M. to 4:00
P.M. at the library; invited all those growing flowers or vegetables in their garden to
participate in the display, noting that prizes would be awarded; and advised that all the
monies raised will be utilized for student scholarships.
R:'uMinutes\041001 2
Ms. MaryAnn Edwards, 42913 Calle Londe, relayed that a local family (the Lopshires) have
a 12-year old son who was born with a condition that has made him susceptible to life
threatening bouts of asthma and pneumonia; advised that the medication which sustains
Nathan's life is not covered by insurance; and relayed that there will be a fundraiser for the
Lopshire family on April 25th, Nathan's 13th birthday, at Stadium Pizza in Redhawk from 6:00
to 9:00 P.M., noting that a generous percentage of the monies generated from purchasing
pizzas at this event will go directly to the family.
Mr. Mark Mush, 31731 Code Avalos, commended Councilman Stone for his patience in
dealing with the negative comments expressed from the representatives of the Temecula
First group; noted his pleasure with the opening of Highway 79 (South); and advised that he
was opposed to Councilman Naggar's concepts regarding campaign contributions.
Mr. Harold Provin, 44750 Villa Del Sol, road a portion of a news article which stated that a
group of residents have been bashing the City with the apparent intent of gaining control
and turning Temecula into a short-sighted version of a moratorium city, highlighting the
recent accomplishments in the City of Temecula, including convenient shopping, Iow crime
rates, beautiful parks, new paramedic services, the Overland Bridge Project, and the
numerous road improvements constructed prior to the mall opening.
Mr. Ed Dool, 28464 Old Town Front Street, thanked staff and the City Council for the
successful Western Days event held in Old Town, commending the City Council for their
efforts in Old Town; and applauded the installation of the signage warning drivers of red light
violations which had been placed at the intersection of Ynez/Rancho California Roads.
It was noted that the City Council heard additional public comments after the City
Council reports were considered; see page 4.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Concurring with Mr. Dool's comments regarding the effectiveness of the rod light
violation signage recently installed, Councilman Stone additionally noted that the
Stop Red Light Abuse Program (SLAP) would be implemented, which encompassed
a special traffic team designated at specific intersections to cite red light violators, as
well as, stopping drivers who observe the yellow/rod lights in order to give these
conscientious drivers a reward (i.e., a gift certificate for a local restaurant); and
thanked Police Chief Domenoe for his efforts organizing the program.
Relaying that last Saturday, Mayor Comerchero and he had hosted the community
workshop for the 40-acre Sports Park Project, Councilman Stone thanked all the
residents who attended, advising that great input was provided.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts noted that last week a press conference was held
announcing the donation of $4.4 million for the Pala Road Ultimate Improvements
Project, relaying special thanks to the Tribal Chairman Macarro, the Tribal Council
Members, and the members of the Pechanga Development Corporation. In addition,
Mayor Comerchero relayed gratitude to the Tribal Councilman Basquez, who aided
in the securing of this donation.
Commenting on the Building Department being open on April 11th until 7:00 P.M.
during Building and Safety Week, Mayor Comerchero recommended that City Hall be
R:~Minutes\041001 3
opened up more frequently, requesting staff to investigate the feasibility of opening
City Hall from 6:00 to 9:00 P.M. twice a year, providing an opportunity for residents to
take tours, and to meet staff and the City Council. Echoing Mayor Comerchero's
comments, Councilman Stone recommended consideration of holding a Saturday
Open House for those individuals who are unable to come to City Hall on weekdays.
Mayor Comerchem reiterated that Highway 79 (South) was now open from Avenida
De Missions to the freeway, advising that there will be a Ribbon Cutting Ceremony
held by the County on Thursday, April 12th at 9:30 A.M. at the corner of La Paz
Street/Highway 79 (South). Providing additional information, City Manager Nelson
relayed that the loop connectors were now fully operating.
With respect to the signage warning drivers of red light violations, Mayor
Comerchero advised that this concept was implemented as a result of a trip taken to
the City of Brea where the signage was seen and photographed; and commended
Director of Public Works Hughes, and staff, for the expeditious installation of the
signs.
At this time the City Council heard additional public comments.
Mr. Wesley Hylen, representing the Roripaugh Project, requested the City Council to
consider expediting the processing of approvals for this particular project; noted the past
discussions the Roripaugh representatives have had with staff and Councilmembers
regarding expediting this schedule; specified the three additional items that the applicant
has been requested to address, inclusive of mitigation for school facilities, energy efficient
homes and buildings, and provision of a study to establish a traffic baseline for the project;
advised that as long as the applicant is provided an expedited processing procedure the
provision of the additional items would be acceptable to the applicant, as well as, having
these items included as part of the Development Agreement; noted that this project would
provide the City with the opportunity complete a major road bypass (i.e., the Butterfield
Stage Road, and Murrieta Hot Springs Road Projects), relaying other improvements which
would be implemented with the project; and requested that if this approval process cannot
be expedited, that the City Council jointly process a separate Specific Plan and EIR through
the City and the County simultaneously.
For Councilman Naggar, Mr. Hyten confirmed that the applicant was willing to pay full level
school mitigation fees, to go forward with an independent traffic study, to establish a
moratorium of not more than 60 days at one time in a calendar year in regard to a Stage 3
electrical power outage, that the project's traffic would generate approximately twenty
percent (20%) of the traffic on Butterfield Stage Road, but would provide approximately
eighty percent (80%) traffic relief for vehicles from other areas, and that the project has
reduced the residential units to 1721; in response to Councilman Stone, specified the
applicant's timetable, noting that the construction of Butterfield Stage Road has been
scheduled to be constructed from March of 2002 to October of 2002, advising that to meet
this timeframe, approvals would be needed by August 15th.
Relaying the benefits of having land use authority, Councilman Stone advised that if this
project goes to the County, the City will have no control over what will be approved.
For Councilman Stone, Deputy City Manager Thornhill relayed that staff received the Draft
EIR approximately a week ago, noting the required staff time for the extensive review;
advised that if the applicant could expedite his turnaround time for submittals, and if it was
the City Council's desire to move this project forward, the earliest date that staff could bring
this project to hearing would be in September, or October; and recommended that the
Subcommittee work with staff at which time the timetable could be discussed and the
Subcommittee could bring back a recommendation.
Mayor Comerchero recommended agendizing this issue for the next regular City Council
meeting, and at that time that the Subcommittee provide a report to the City Council,
For Councilman Naggar, Mr. Hylen clarified the time restraints associated with this project,
noting that the applicant has an option on the property, relaying that the applicant has to
abide by that date.
Mr. Richard Ashby, applicant for the Roripaugh Project, relayed that the EIR previously
referenced was the third EIR that has been submitted; noted that Supervisor Venable was
quoted in the newspaper, stating that he expects five million people visiting the new
recreational dam every year, relaying that the Butterfield Stage Road Project would relieve
Winchester Road and Highway 79 (South) from some of this anticipated traffic; noted that he
has been working on this project since early 1998; requested that the City Council agree to
fast-track the project or make the applicant aware that this would not be feasible so that the
project could be processed through the County.
City Manager Nelson advised that staff would schedule a meeting with the Subcommittee
and agendize this matter for the April 24th City Council meeting.
CONSENT CALENDAR
2
3
Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included
in the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of January 16, 2001, Joint City Council/Planning
Commission meeting.
It was noted that Mayor Comerchero abstained from this item.
Resolution Approving List of Demand,~
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R:~vlinutes\041001
RESOLUTION NO. 01-24
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
4
5
6
City Treasurer's Report as of February 28, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of February 28, 2001.
Approval of Funds for Plan Review Services with Es,qil Corporation
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve an expenditure in an amount not to exceed $50,000 for Plan Check
Services with Esgil Corporation.
License Agreement between RCFCD & WCD and the City of Temecula for Via
Montezuma Low-Flow Crossin,q at Murrieta Creek- Project No. PW99-15
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Approve the License Agreement between Riverside County Flood Control
and Water Conservation District (RCFCD & WCD) and the City of Temecula
for the Via Montezuma Low-Flow Crossing at Murrieta Creek - Project No.
PW99-15.
Award of Construction Contract for the installation of a traffic signal at MarRarita
Road and Stonewood Road- Project No. PW00-1R
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
Award a contract for the installation of a traffic signal at Margarita Road and
Stonewood Road - Project No. PW00-18 -to DBX, Inc. for $132,000.00 and
authorize the City Manager to execute the contract;
7.2
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $13,200.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract
amount;
7.3
Approve a transfer of $80,000.00 Development Impact Fees - traffic signals,
PaJa Road at Lema Linda Road, and $80,000.00 from Pala Road at Wolf
Valley Road for the installation of a traffic signal at Margarita Road and
Stonewood Road.
It was noted that Councilman Naggar abstained from this item.
R:',Minutes\041001 6
8 Award of a Contract for the Light Em tt n,q D ode (LED) Traffic Si,qna Conversion
Program - Proiect No. PW01-03
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
Award the contract for the Light Emitting Diode (LED) Traffic Signal
Conversion Program - Project No. PW01-03 - to Fluoresco Lighting & Signs
for the corrected bid amount of $332,681.73 provided that they furnish and
install the LED units by the June 1, 2001, deadline set by the California
Energy Commission and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract;
8.2
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $33,268.17 which is equal to 10% of the contract
amount;
8.3
Approve a transfer of $59,000 from Capital Project Reserves - Rainbow
Canyon South Interchange - and $31,000 from Flashing Beacons 2000 for
the Light Emitting Diode (LED) Traffic Signal Conversion Program
This item was pulled for separate discussion; see page 8.
Solicitation of Construction Bids and Approval of the Plans and Specifications for
Project No. PW01-07 - FY2000-01 - Slurry Seal Project
RECOMMENDATION;
9.1
Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the
Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for Project No.
PW01-07 - FY2000-01 - Slurry Seal Project.
10 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 01-05 (Monthly Compensation for City
Commissioners)
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 01-05
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION NO. 2.40.100 OF
THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO
MONTHLY COMPENSATION FOR CITY
COMMISSIONERS
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-7, and
9-10. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts and voice vote reflected
approval with the exception of Mayor Comerchero who abstained from Item No. 2, and
Councilman Naggar who abstained from Item No. 7.
At this time the City Council considered Consent Calendar Item No. 8.
8
Award of a Contract for the Liqht Emitt nq D ode (LED) Traffic S qna Conversion
Pro.qram - Proiect No. PW01-03
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
Award the contract for the Light Emitting Diode (LED) Traffic Signal
Conversion Program - Project No. PW01-03 - to Fluoresco Lighting & Signs
for the corrected bid amount of $332,681.73 provided that they furnish and
install the LED units by the June 1, 2001, deadline set by the California
Energy Commission and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract;
8.2
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $33,268.17 which is equal to 10% of the contract
amount;
8.3
Approve a transfer of $59,000 from Capital Project Reserves - Rainbow
Canyon South Interchange - and $31,000 from Flashing Beacons 2000 for
the Light Emitting Diode (LED) Traffic Signal Conversion Program
Director of Public Works Hughes provided an overview of the staff report (of record), noting
that on February 13, 2001 the City Council authorized the Department of Public Works to
advertise for construction bids for the Light Emitting Diode (LED) Traffic Signal Conversion
Program1 that on March 6th bids were opened, and that staff received eight (8) bids for this
project; advised that the apparent Iow bidder (Fluoresco Lighting & Signs) submitted a bid
with a possible omission in the bid documents, relaying that there were 15 bid items and that
one was left blank; noted that the blank item was to provide for a cost for salvaging the
excess existing equipment to the City Hall, clarifying that the contractor did not disclose a
cost associated with that work.
At the time the bids were reviewed, Director of Public Works Hughes noted that City Staff
was of the opinion that this omission may result in disqualification of their bid, relaying,
however, that when the omission was brought to the attention of the contractor, he provided
written clarification indicating that the blank bid item represented a "0," or no cost for
salvaging this equipment to the City; advised that postponing the award process, staff
received a legal opinion from the City Attorney's office, noting that it was staff's clear opinion
that it would be the City's prerogative to award to this Iow bidder, recognizing that the blank
item represents an item with no cost.
Apprising the City Council of the problem at this time, Director of Public Works Hughes
relayed that the apparent Iow bidder has advised the City that he is not willing to guarantee
that the work will be completed by June 1, 2001; noted that typically this would not be a
significant issue, but that in this case the City has a $140,000 grant paying for the bulk of
this contract, and that this particular grant requires that the work be completed by June Ist,
or the City would be in a position to have to request an extension of that time, relaying that
the request for an extension could result in a reduction in the grant amount by ten percent
(10%) if they opt to grant the extension, noting that they could choose not to grant the
extension at all, which would put the entire amount of grant funding at risk; clarified that the
staff report recommends that the award be made, and that it be contingent upon completion
by June lSd, reiterating that the contractor (Fluoresco) has provided a written explanation
R:\Minutes\041001 8
stating that the June 1st completion date would not be possible due to the delay in the
awarding of the contract; advised that the second lowest bidder has indicated that they
would be prepared to complete the work by June 1st, recommending that if the City Council
opts to consider awarding to the second lowest bidder that it would only be done based on
the lowest bidder requesting that he be removed from the bid process; and noted that both
contractors were present to answer questions of the City Council.
In response to Councilman Stone, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that on the
other seven bids, the contractors had filled in the blank next to the item which was omitted
by the lowest bidder.
Councilman Stone opined that if the application was incomplete it should be considered null
and void, and that subsequently consideration should go to the second lowest bidder
(Republic Electric), advising that if this is not done, it would be his recommendation that all
the bids be discarded and that the contract bids be reopened; noted that with the omitted
item the contractor could have intentionally Iow-balled the bid, relaying that in his opinion it
would not be appropriate to then allow this contractor to state that a "0," was meant to be
placed by the omitted item, and to subsequently award the contract to this contractor.
With respect to the potential to be penalized for not completing the project by June 1st, for
Councilman Naggar, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that in his experience
typically stipulations are provided, encouraging cities to abide by those stipulations; noted
that in almost all the cases that he has been involved with, where technicalities or dates
were not met precisely, forgiveness was usually provided if the intent and the best effort was
made on the part of the local agency to meet those requirements, noting that in this
particular case, it was being heard Statewide that the overall date may be extended based
on a shortage of equipment; in response to Councilman Naggar's queries regarding the
worst case scenario, advised that in his opinion the most likely worst case scenario would
be that the City would receive a ten percent (10%) penalty; and specified that the second
lowest bid was $36,000 higher than the lowest bid.
In response to Councilman Pratt's queries regarding Councilman Stone's comments with
respect to starting the bid process over, Director of Public Works Hughes advised that due
to the timing issues it would be his recommendation that the bid process was not begun
again, noting that at this time the work would most likely be able to be completed within a
couple weeks of the deadline if the lowest bidder was awarded the contract, and with the
second lowest bidder, the contractor was committed to making the June 1st date, advising
that if the project went back out to bid, the deadline would most likely be missed by several
months,
Addressing the questions of Council, for Councilman Naggar, Director of Public Works
Hughes noted that the contract documents, as written, would hold the contractor responsible
for meeting the intent of the grant application terms; for Councilman Stone, indicated that
the omitted item on the lowest bid, had been included on the other bids at a cost ranging
from $500 to $4556, specifying that Republic Electric's bid denoted a cost of $2500 for this
item; and for Mayor Comerchero, advised that in all his years of experience if a contractor
intended the cost for a bid item to be "0" cost, that the contractor would place a "0" dollar
amount.
Mr. Gary Gryder, representing Fluoresco Lighting and Signs, relayed that his company was
the lowest responsive bidder on bid day; noted the Fluoresco filed a protest shortly after
R:'A, linutes\041001 9
they were made aware that their bid was non-responsive, advising that on March 19th they
received an answer to that protest rejecting the bid, and had no further contact with the City
until last week when Fluoresco received a fax from the Public Works Department requesting
information regarding the materials supplier, and the company's ability to finish the work by
June 1st; advised that the company does not keep this material in stock, did not anticipate
being awarded the contract, and would not be able to complete the project by June 1st; and
with respect to the omitted figure on one of the bid items, relayed that no figure was denoted
due to there being no charge for delivering to the City the material that would be taken
down.
Ms. Laura Innes, representing Republic Electric, opined that the City Council should not
award the contract to Fluoresco, but to Republic, who was in fact the lowest responsive
bidder for the following reasons: to maintain fundamental fairness, noting that along with the
$30,000 worth of math errors in Fluoresco's bid, there was the blank Item No. 15, advising
that this omission is not an unheard of tactic among contractors, who desired to view the
other bids and to reevaluate their position; additionally noted that posted on the City's
website was the notice that the Fluoresco bid was disqualified, advising that this information
was confirmed in writing by the City Engineer's Office via faxing the spread sheet which
stated that Fluoresco's bid was disqualified, as well as, discussions with staff confirming the
disqualification; relayed that Republic Electric does not keep these products in stock and
that based on Fluoresco's disqualification, Republic ordered the materials in March in order
to be able to make the June 1st deadline; noted that Republic can meet the June 1st deadline
which will alleviate concerns regarding a possible ten percent (10%) penalty; provided
additional information regarding the energy costs saved with the earlier installation; and
concluded that since Republic was told that Fluoresco was disqualified, that Republic has
the materials for the project, and that the project will be completed by June 1$~, it is
Republic's position that their company should be awarded the contract as the lowest
responsive bidder.
Assistant City Attorney Curley advised that the bid package has specified the June 1st date,
noting that the grant specifications have been included in, and made part of, the contract,
clarifying that the June Ist date is a key matter; relayed that if was the City Attorney's
Office's opinion that if one is stating that they cannot meet the terms of the contract, that this
would be an unresponsive situation; addressed the omitted item in the bid document, noting
that the bidder went on record stating the intent for that to represent a no cost item which
could be considered valid, while noting that it was equally valid to view this as an
unresponsive bid due to the expectation for a figure to be placed next to the item; and
reiterated that a key issue with this project was the June 1st deadline.
Recommending that the City Council maintain the integrity of the bid process which has
been blemished in this case, Councilman Stone advised that it was only appropriate and fair
to award the contract to Republic Electric, noting that this company filled out the bid
correctly, and can meet the June 1s~ deadline.
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to award the contract to the second lowest bidder,
Republic Electric. The motion was seconded by Councilman Naggar. (Ultimately this
motion was amended; see page '11.)
Councilman Naggar noted the importance of the City adopting a policy whereby the bid is
required to be completed exactly as instructed, in order to prevent further discrepancies,
requesting that this component be added to the motion.
MOTION: Amending his previous motion, Councilman Stone moved to award the bid to
the second lowest bidder, Republic Electric, and to direct staffto tighten up the bid
review process. The motion was seconded by Councilman Naggar. (Ultimately this
motion passed; see below.)
For future bid processes, Mayor Pro Tem Roberts recommended that staff not notify a
contractor that a bid has been rejected until this fact is certain, concurring with
Councilman Stone's comments.
Mayor Comerchero opined that once Republic was notified that Fluoresco's bid was
disqualified, and Republic subsequently ordered the materials in preparation to fulfill the
time deadlines included in the terms of the contract, that the City was more than
obligated to award the contract to Republic Electric.
Noting his support of the City Council motion, Director of Public Works Hughes offered
the following clarification: that the Public Works Department has a very stringent bid
process, that staff did not have the authority to disqualify any bidder, that the previously
referenced discussions between staff and the contractors had solely alluded to stars
expectation of what would occur, and not that a bid had been rejected, since this was not
within the authority of staff; noted that staff will work to ensure that bids are coming in as
clean as possible, while relaying that in this particular case, staff would not have been in
position to discard the bid with the omitted item, and that it would still need to be brought
before the City Council in order for staff to address the inconsistencies with the Council.
Councilman Naggar queried whether the City Manager could be granted the authority to
disqualify a bid.
In response, Assistant City Attorney Curley advised that staff would further investigate
the issue, noting that typically this was a non-delegable duty; and noted that staff would
identify the extent to which bids could be handled administratively.
At this time voice vote was taken reflecting unanimous approval of the motion.
At 8:23 P. M., the City Council recessed, reconvening at 8:33 P.M., as the Temecula
Community Services District, and the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. At 8:43 P.M.,
the City Council resumed with regularly scheduled City Council business.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
11 Consideration of Subcommittee to consider Homeless Proqrams and Service~
(as requested by Councilman Naggar)
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Consider the formation of a subcommittee to make recommendations to the
City Council regarding Homeless Programs and Services
Relaying that after Supervisor Bust~r's presentation at the March 27, 2001 City Council
meeting which outlined the needs regarding the homeless in Southwest Riverside
County, Councilman Naggar noted that he had requested that this item be agendized in
R:~Vlinutes\041001 I I
order for the City Council to consider establishing a Subcommittee to further discuss the
issue and to make recommendations to the Council; and offered to serve on this
Subcommittee.
Mr. Chuck Washington, 29605 Solana Way, relayed his support for Supervisor Buster's
efforts and his vision for this community; and volunteered to serve on this Subcommittee,
noting his previous service experience in the last five years (i.e., assisting the
Alternatives to Domestic Violence, and Habitat for Humanity Organizations).
MOTION: Commending Mr. Washington for his desire to be involved, Councilman
Stone moved to appoint Councilman Naggar, and Councilman Pratt to serve on the
Subcommittee, recommending that the Subcommittee meetings be open to any citizen,
including Mr. Washington, who would desire to participate and help solve this issue. The
motion was seconded by Mayor Pre Tem Roberts. (Ultimately this motion passed;
see below.)
Concurring with Mr. Washington's comments, Mayor Pro Tern Roberts noted the
benefits of involving citizens with this matter, advising that there are numerous programs
in Southwest Riverside County serving people in need; and recommended that the
Subcommittee gather information from these other organizations in order to form a
cohesive evaluation as to the need in this area.
Mayor Comerchero recommended that the Subcommittee not just address the sheltering
of the homeless, concurring with Mayor Pro Tem Roberts that broader issues should be
investigated.
Noting the hardships that can render one homeless, Councilman Naggar relayed the
desire to create a mechanism to aid in these situations.
At this time voice vote was taken reflecting unanimous approval of the motion.
12
Consideration of Limitations on Campai,qn Contributions
(as requested by Councilman Naggar)
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Discuss limitations on Campaign Contributions and provide direction to staff.
Providing the staff report (of record), Assistant to the City Manager Yates presented a brief
history of the issue of limitations on campaign contributions as it relates to Temecula; noted
that in April of 1997, the City Council adopted an Ordinance providing a voluntary
expenditure ceiling equivalent to $1.00 per resident in the City, which had followed the
enactment of Proposition No. 208 that permitted cities to establish such ceilings; advised
that subsequently there was a legal challenge regarding Proposition No. 208, ergo, the City
Council adopted an Urgency Ordinance repealing the 1997 Ordinance; and noted that at this
time cities are beginning to once again adopt such volunteer campaign ceilings (Le., the City
of Murrieta recently adopted a ceiling limit set at $.50 per registered voter.)
For Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, City Clerk Jones relayed that there were approximately 26,000
registered voters in the City of Temecula.
R:~lJnutes\041001 ~2
In response to Councilman Naggar, Assistant to the City Manager Yates provided an
overview of Murrieta's recently passed Ordinance, advising that it was a volunteer ceiling
limit, reiterating that with respect to expenditures the ceiling was set at $.50 per registered
voter; and noted that staff could investigate the manner in which the City of Murrieta would
address fundraising amounts attained above the expenditure ceiling.
For Mayor Comerchero, Assistant City Attorney Curley advised that most of the ceiling limits
are established with a voluntary structure, relaying that staff could further explore the issue.
Mr. Chris Pederson, 31052 Wellington Circle, noted that he was a proponent of setting
campaign contribution ceilings in order to keep the elements of corruption and over-
influence away from the process.
Mr. Carl Ross, 43886 Butternut Drive, noted his support of campaign financing limits in order
to limit the influence individuals, who are not registered as Temecula voters, have on the
City of Temecula.
Mr. Paul Jacobs, 32370 Corte Zamura Court, noted the shrewdness of Councilman Naggar
raising the issue of placing ceilings on campaign contributions in a year when he is not
running for reelection; relayed that it was clear that the challengers of the City Council were
a very well organized group, noting that while it is commendable for Councilman Naggar to
return a favor to his supporters, that the motive for setting campaign contribution limits at
this time appears to be disingenuous, suggesting that Councilman Naggar revisit this issue
when he is running for reelection so that he could experience the full impact of this desire.
In response to Councilman Naggar, Mr. Jacobs relayed that he had no knowledge of the
motive for the City of Murrieta recently setting campaign limits; with respect to allowing a
$50,000 amount of total contributions, noted that while he could not provide advisement
regarding the amount of financing necessary to organize a campaign, that a $50,000 figure
seemed appropriate, relaying that in his opinion, individuals should be able to gather the
resources they are able to obtain, and be able to amount a campaign as they see fit, as a
matter of free speech, and free right; with respect to developers' comments allegedly made
regarding the purpose of contributing a large amount of money to discourage other
individuals from being able to run in the race, advised that in his opinion individuals make
numerous comments dudng political campaigns, noting that it appeared that developers
were continually being bashed while it was through their work that the City obtained wider
roads, additional traffic lights, and the building of the houses that are lived in; clarified that it
was the timing of Councilman Naggar's request that raised concern; and confirmed that
Councilman Naggar should be willing to abide by the limits that may be established tonight.
For Councilman Stone's queries regarding Mr. Jacobs's opinion with respect to a link
between monies raised, and an individual getting elected, Mr. Jacobs noted that there was
not a clear cut connection, advising that with large contributions if an individual did not have
the support, he, or she, would not be elected; and confirmed that in his opinion it was
dubious that this issue was being raised by an individual who may have difficulty raising
money due to the lack of support for their political views.
Noting that he would not be opposed to setting a limit at $.50 per registered voter,
Councilman Pratt relayed that one could do a lot of campaigning for approximately $13,000,
while advising that if funds beyond that amount have already been raised, that this limit
R:'~vlinutes\041001
should not be retroactive; and noted that he would additionally support a limit for
Councilmembers to serve for only two terms, relaying that these limits would provide more
individuals an opportunity to serve in local government.
Councilman Naggar opined that the rationale for considering setting campaign limits in
numerous communities (i.e., the City of Murrieta) was for the purpose of limiting influence
and to make running for City Council available to the average citizen; referenced a portion of
the Murrieta Ordinance's preamble, which stated that large campaign contributions can
undermine the public's trust in the electoral process and lead to unfair competition between
candidates, relaying that campaigning ceilings have limited the appearance and incidents of
corruption that have been experienced; clarified that he requested that this issue be
considered specifically due to the large amount of money being raised and a specific intent
brought up by a local fundraiser declaring that it is imperative that a substantial amount of
money be raised for each candidate (currently serving on the City Council) to send a strong
message to potential challengers; and advised that the average citizen cannot compete with
the amount of these contributions.
Via overheads, Mayor Pro Tem Roberts presented two mailers that had been distributed to
Temecula voters during the 1999 campaign, noting that both dashed developers; advised
that both of these items were sent from Action Mail in Escondido, relaying that they both had
bogus addresses; after reviewing the disclosures of all the candidates two years ago, noted
that while one candidate claimed over $4500 in payments to Action Mail, and another
claimed under $400, it appeared that neither of these mailers were claimed by either of
these candidates or by anyone else, clarifying that this was approximately $5,000 in postage
expense from another source and not claimed in any filings; advised that if everything was
equal, and a clean election had been held two years ago, he could support a Iow ceiling
limit, noting that he was reluctant to setting Iow limits when others will most likely circumvent
the system as in the last election; opined that a ceiling limit of $.50 per registered voter was
not acceptable, relaying the funds expended by candidates during the election two years
ago; noted that the previous 1997 Ordinance set limits at $1.00 per resident which had been
suspended due to a later court decision, but could potentially be put back on the books at
this time; and as a compromise, advised that he would be willing to support a ceiling limit of
$.50 per resident, allowing the use of the California Department of Finance Population
figures to be used as a guide for increasing the count prior to each election.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Roberts moved to direct staff to bring back an Ordinance setting a
voluntary campaign spending limit of $.50 per resident. Mayor Comerchero seconded the
motion. (Ultimately this motion was amended; see page 15.)
Councilman Stone relayed that Councilman Naggar raised more money than any other
individual during the last election, noting that one of his biggest contributors had been a
developer that he has been extremely supportive of in the past (per his voting record),
clarifying that he was not inferring that there was any wrongdoing, while expressing his
resentment that Councilman Naggar, and others, were inferring that money is going to
influence the votes of the other Councilmembers; advised that while he did not believe in
campaign limits, or term limits due to the infringement of constitutional rights, that he would
support Councilman Naggar's recommended $.50 per registered vote campaign limit if
Councilmen Naggar and Pratt would relinquish their posts this year so that all the
Councilmembers would be accountable for the same amount of money, and all five
members could run for the seats this November.
R:~Viinutes\041001 14
For clarification purposes, City Manager Nelson relayed that the annexation of Vail Ranch
will occur July 1st, advising that approximately 6,000 residents will be added to the
population at that time.
Mayor Comerchero recommended that a specific date be established for applying the
population count, recommending that the motion be amended to include that the last day of
filing for candidates (which is in August) to be the date utilized for the population count.
MOTION: Amending his motion, Mayor Pro Tem Roberts moved to direct staff to bring back
an Ordinance setting a voluntary campaign spending limit of $.50 per resident, and that the
population count would be imposed the last day of the filing period. Mayor Comerchero
seconded the motion. (Ultimately this motion failed; see below.)
Assistant City Attorney Curley advised that the Constitutional authorization to place
limitations on political speech revolve around an appearance of impropriety or some sod of
corruption, noting that staff will come back with language in an Ordinance, reflecting the
appearance of impropriety as the driving force behind the City Council's action; and noted
that when the language comes back to the Council, that it should be carefully reviewed in
order to ensure that it reflects the collective consensus of the Council.
For Mayor Comerchero, City Manager Nelson advised that staff could bring back an
ordinance in 30 days.
Concurring with Councilman Stone, Mayor Comerchero noted that generally he would not
favor campaign limits due to the infringement on free speech; relayed that every individual
had the ability to raise monies, while noting that he was opposed to those who write their
own checks (citing a specific example of a candidate who ran for Assemblyman), advising
that this creates an unequal playing field; noted that whatever limits are set, most likely there
will be candidates who find avenues that do not have to be made pubic, recommending that
the limits not be set too Iow so as to decrease this risk; and noted his support of the motion.
Commenting on the motion, Councilman Naggar advised that there would be no way the
average citizen could compete with the incumbency in this regard.
At this time roll call vote was taken reflecting that the motion failed, as follows: 2~3~0
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers:
Councilmembers:
Councilmembers:
Comerchero, and Roberts.
Naggar, Pratt, and Stone.
None.
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to direct staff to bring back an ordinance reflecting
that the campaign contributions be voluntarily limited to $.50 per reg stered voter as of
July 1st, 2001, contingent upon Councilmen Naggar and Pratt volunteering to rehnqu~sh
their positions in November of 2001 in order for all five Councilmembers to abide by the
same rules. (This motion died for lack of a second.)
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
No additional comments.
R:'~vlinutes\041001 15
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
No additional comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 9:22 P.M., Mayor Comerchero formally adjourned the City Council meeting to the
City Council Workshop on Tuesday, April 17, 2001 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Council
Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Jeffrey Comerchero, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:\Minutes\041001 16
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED WORKSHOP MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 17, 2001
The City of Temecula City Council convened in an adjourned workshop meeting at 6:00
P.M., on Tuesday, April 17, 2001, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall,
43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Councilman Naggar.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Councilmembers:
Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone,
and Mayor Comerchero.
Absent:
Councilmember: None.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
At the request of Councilman Pratt, City Clerk Jones read into the record a letter he had written
expressing gratitude, and offering accolades for the endless interviews and research conducted by
the Riverside County Integrated Project staff in preparing an effective integrated plan; and which
additionally noted his concerns regarding the importance of the consideration of an emergency
construction plan of a mass transportation system to be in place and operational within five years.
In response to Councilman Pratt's comments, Mr. Jim Henderson, Project Manager, thanked
Councilman Pratt for his words of praise; with respect to his remarks regarding the need for mass
transportation, noted the mutual concern regarding vehicular traffic in Riverside County, advising
that the solutions being proposed were oriented towards developing a mass transit system, and to
additionally address the increasing volumes of truck traffic; relayed the efforts to bring jobs to
Riverside County which will decrease the need to travel back and forth between counties in
automobiles; and provided additional information regarding the development of the Transit Oasis
Concept.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
1 Sixth Workshop for the Riverside County Integrated Plan (RCIP)
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Receive and file.
Noting that this was the sixth workshop related to the Riverside County Integrated Plan (RCIP),
City Manager Nelson advised that these quarterly meetings were continuing; and relayed that
County staff would be providing a presentation.
R:\Minutes\041701
1
Relaying the joint efforts to balance the growth of our population with the mobility needs,
housing requirements, and open space and conservation elements, Mr. Henderson advised that
achieving this balance was a "quality of life" issue, which was the emphasis of the Riverside
County Integrated Plan (RCIP).
Via a Power Point presentation, Mr. Henderson updated the City Council regard n,q the RCIP,
providing an overview of the followin,q' ' '
The goals for the project, inclusive of:
The accommodation of the transportation needs of our urbanizing region with
alternative forms of transit, and
An integrated approach to habitat conservation.
The adoption of the General Plan Vision Alternative, which would be carried forward
through the environmental documents for the General Plan, which was the plan with
community separators, and with land uses oriented towards developing jobs.
The Incentives Program endorsed by the Board as an avenue to increase density within
the urban cores.
The Alternative No. 1 Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), which provides
the most robust reserve design, specifying the following:
The efforts to investigate avenues to implement this aggressive plan (i.e., obtain input
from the Resource Agencies),
The plan to complete the plan by the summer, and
The cities involvement with the Implementation Agreement.
The refinement of the Community and Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process
(CETAP), noting the following:
The ongoing negotiations with the Resource Agencies regarding the development of
corridors, and
That a series of alternatives will be carried forward for environmental review.
· The development of a Special Area Management Plan (SAMP).
· The restructuring of the Advisory Committee in order to refine the process.
For Councilman Naggar, Mr. Henderson confirmed that the Incentives Program and the Vision
Alternative included the concept of developing compact communities (i.e., denser cores) which
would provide the critical mass for transit and would leave separators around the exteriors of the
communities.
Elaborating on the Community Centers Program, for Councilman Naggar, Mr. Jerry Jollife,
Transportation/Land Manager, relayed that data regarding the Board's adoption to initiate their
interest in the program, and information regarding the structure of the Incentives Program could
be provided to the City Council, noting that the fundamentals of the program allows higher
densities in these relatively small community areas based upon the developer's agreement to
provide amenities and benefits to the project via design features; and advised that this program
was intended to be coordinated with the Transit Oasis Concept.
R:\Minutes\041701
2
Continuing his Power Point presentationI Mr. Henderson provided information regard nq th~'=
following e ements: ' '
The aggressive timeline schedule, inclusive of:
The County's documents being completed by the summer,
The review process continuing through the end of the year,
The public review process being held in January,
The finalizing of the documents by mid-year, and
The opportunities throughout the process for the cities to address their concerns.
The ongoing involvement of the cities, relaying the meetings that were being held to gather
initial input, advising that City Manager Nelson will be provided the Alternatives Milestone
Document which outlines the Board's endorsed process for this project, as well as, a CD
which outlines the updated surrounding areas from which the traffic model will be derived.
With respect to the input from the cities, Councilman Naggar noted that the Cities of Lake
Elsinore and Murrieta have expressed extreme dissatisfaction with the layout of the MSHCP,
relaying similar concerns expressed from the Cities of Perris, Beaumont, and Banning; and
specified that the concern was regarding the amount of commercial area being eliminated.
Noting the City's endorsement of Alternative No. 1, Mayor Comerchero queried why the French
Valley area was omitted from consideration for habitat when it appears to be far better-suited
than the commercial property in Lake EIsinore and Murrieta.
In response, Mr. Henderson relayed that there were specific restrictions that had to be taken
into consideration, as well as, the quality of habitat; noted that in French Valley there were
various significant streams which are confined with respect to opportunities to enhance that
natural space; advised that there was the aggressive acquisition of habitat in the Warm Springs
Creek area, additionally noting the interest in the area just east of the 215 freeway at Clinton
Keith Road which was good quino habitat; relayed that the balance between the needs of
development and transportation, with those of wildlife, would continue to be addressed as the
process continues; with respect to the selection of the Lake Elsinore area, relayed that this area
was gnatcatcher habitat; advised that the Resource Agencies have defined certain unique
wildlife and habitat areas as necessary components; and noted that avenues to accommodate
the needs of these various cities will be pursued as the process goes forward.
Continuinq his presentation, Mr. Henderson apprised the City Council of the followinq elemenI,,;
· The CETAP issues, noting as follows:
The four priority corridors, two being in-County, and two being out of County,
That the Moreno Valley/San Bernardino Corridor is making excellent progress,
relaying the positive input at the community meetings held during the last two weeks.
Provided an update regarding the Orange County Corridor, relaying that a meeting
was held last Thursday with the Orange County Transportation Agency, and that on
Friday there were discussions involving two Supervisors and a Councilmember
addressing the synergy that should exist between Riverside and Orange Counties on
both housing and jobs issues.
Presented the various alternative routes.
R:\Minutes\041701
3
For Mayor Comerchero, Mr. Steve Smith, CE'rAP Project Manager, relayed that there has been
coordination with Riverside Transit Authority (RTA), noting that RTA sits on the CETAP Advisory
Committee, elaborating the considerations in terms of long-range transportation strategies.
Providing additional information for Mayor Comerchero, Mr. Edwin Studor, Administrative
Manager, relayed that Highway 79 (South) had been investigated as a transportation corridor,
that additional right-of-way was being acquired for future transportation options, that this
component was also part of the Transit Oasis Strategy, that a 30-year program may be needed
for long-term transit improvements, and that the 215 freeway was also designated as a transit
corridor.
Relaying appreciation for the update, and the efforts to coordinate with San Bernardino and
Orange Counties, Councilman Stone queried whether County staff was aware of the fact that
years ago, a local developer had designed and engineered a road going from Clinton Keith
Road to the coast; and questioned whether there was any useful information from this plan that
could save time in developing an east/west corridor to Orange County.
In response to Councilman Stone, Mr. Studor provided additional information regarding two
proposals previously generated for "A road to the coast," specifying the elements that would not
have been feasible with these plans; and noted that the current options being investigated for
the Orange County connection included traversing through the Cleveland National Forest, that
the Forest is updating their Forest Plan at this time, and that efforts will be made to coordinate
with them as far as evaluating this corridor.
Noting that at a recent meeting he attended, a member had suggested installation of a railway
system from Lake Elsinore to serve as both a scenic and a transportation corridor to the coast,
Councilman Pratt queried whether this concept had been considered. In response, Mr. Studor
advised that most of the old railroad right-of-ways have been vacated.
Continuing his presentation, Mr. Henderson presented the following informatio,~:
· Noted that Alternative No. 4, which was the Date Street Alternative has been eliminated
from the analysis, relaying that this project would be carried forward as a circulation
element roadway, and would be explored as a necessary part of the process due to the
need to move the volumes of traffic generated as this area develops. Mr. Studor added
that there was a meeting held with City staff to discuss the Date Street connection,
specifically, at Highway 79/Murrieta Hot Springs Road, relaying the recent condominium
project approved by the County which could preclude an interchange flyover at that
location if it is developed; and noted discussions regarding jointly acquiring the property to
preserve the option, advising that the asking price was approximately $5 million.
Acknowledging the costly expense of acquiring the condominium property, Councilman Stone
advised that the City of Temecula was a strong proponent of the Date Street Corridor because
without this particular corridor all the traffic of French Valley would be funneled through the limits
of Temecula to get to the 1-15; advised that solutions must be sought to vitalize this
transportation corridor, making it a top priority in the CETAP process; noted that if this avenue is
not pursued, traffic will be a chronic problem in the City of Temecula with no remedy or
mitigation, relaying that the cost of this property will be insignificant in comparison to the
problems that will occur if the City is required to attempt to accommodate all this traffic with the
anticipated growth in the County within the next fifteen years; and emphasized that this project
needs prioritization, and that the City of Temecula needs partnership with the County due to the
traffic impacts that cannot be mitigated without this it.
R:\Minutes\041701
4
Concurring with Councilman Stone's comments, Councilman Pratt queried whether the County
was exploring attaining funds other than from the public sector, noting the need for substantial
private monies. In response, it was noted that the County Development Agency explores these
types of programs.
For Councilman Naggar, Mr. Studor noted that the condominium developers did have approval
for their project and were moving forward with improvement plans, relaying the need for this
issue to be addressed expeditiously.
With respect to the condominium project, Councilman Stone relayed that the City was not in a
position to use eminent domain since this site was not within the City limits, reiterating the
dependence on the County to solve the regional traffic impacts.
For Councilman Stone1 Mr. Henderson relayed that the Eastern Bypass Project could address
the same issues, noting that this alternative was selected at the Riverside County
Transportation Commission (RCTC) level, as the option which had a better chance of survival
than Alternative No. 4 due to the acquisition costs and the impacts on neighborhoods, while
noting that since the Resource Agencies are not supportive of the Eastern Bypass Alternative,
efforts are needed to further explore the issues.
Mr. Studor added that the southerly extension of Alternative Nos. 5, or 6 that would tie into the
new interchange on the 1-15 was in an area that the Resource Agencies were concerned about,
advising that this particular area would also have to be coordinated with the tribal interests; and
noted that these projects would provide the most relief in terms of the Eastern Bypass due to
the new connection to the 1-15.
Mayor Pro Tern Roberts requested assurance that the City of Temecula would have
representation during the CETAP focused meetings regarding Alternative Nos. 5, and 6,
additionally noting the potential public outcry (i.e., from the residents of Vail Ranch, and
Redhawk) if this issue is not fully explored, additionally relaying the potential concerns of the
Pechangas, and the Endangered Habitat League; and recommended that all the involved
entities be involved in the discussions.
With respect to the Date Street Alternative, Councilman Stone recommended that two members
of the Temecula City Council meet with Supervisors Buster and Venable to discuss eminent
domain potentially initiated by the County, and co-funded by the City of Temecula; and
volunteered to meet wth the Supervisors, and their Counsel, to help solve the most important
infrastructure issue that Temecula will face in efforts of alleviating traffic.
In response to Mayor Comerchero, City Attorney Thorson advised that a Subcommittee could
be appointed for these discussions.
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to appoint Mayor Comerchero and himself to serve on a
Subcommittee to meet, along with the City Attorney, Supervisors Buster and Venable, and their
Counsel, to discuss the potential acquisition of property on Murrieta Hot Springs/Winchester
Roads with the ultimate goal of providing a flyover in an effort to make the Date Street
overcrossing a viable corridor in the County of Riverside. The motion was seconded by
Councilman Naggar. (Ultimately this motion passed; see page 6.)
In response to Councilman Naggar, City Attorney Thorson advised that to impose any fees on
development, it would be necessary to identify what sources of funding there were, and that the
R:\Minutes\041701
5
imposition of the fees would be a detailed process, including identifying the nexus between that
development and the fees that would be imposed. Councilman Naggar recommended that the
Subcommittee explore this issue.
For Councilman Stone, City Manager Nelson noted that there may be avenues for
reimbursement for the costs associated with the right-of-way acquisition through Transpodation
Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF), and/or through various grant funds.
Mayor Pro Tern Roberts relayed that the funding for this project could potentially be tied in with
the Date/Cherry Streets overcrossing, advising that since this flyover would be extremely
expensive, monies would need to come from other funding sources. Confirming the approximate
costs of the project, Mr. Steve Smith, CETAP Project Manager, noted that the cost would be
approximately $11 million.
Councilman Pratt enumerated the benefits of the Date Street Corridor.
At this time voice vote was taken regarding the motion, reflecting unanimous approval.
With respect to the Eastern Bypass, Councilman Naggar concurred with Mayor Pro Tern
Roberts, noting that this project would be a sensitive issue, querying whether if this project was
not deemed feasible, the Highway 79 (South) to Butterfield Stage Road Corridor would be the
alternative considered.
In response, Mr. Smith relayed that all of the recommended alternatives would be evaluated
during the environmental review, elaborating on the challenges associated with the Highway 79
(South) option, as well as, the Eastern Bypass option.
Mr. Henderson clarified that no final decisions have been made regarding specific options,
advising that the concepts presented are being explored and reviewed; for Mayor Pro Tem
Roberts, relayed that discussions regarding Alternative Nos. 5, and 6 will take place with the
Resource Agencies on Thursday and Friday; and noted efforts to expedite the environmental
process.
In response to Councilman Naggar, Mr. Smith noted that the initial results of the traffic
circulation model will be completed at the end of May; relayed that there would be discussions
with staff regarding the preliminary results; and advised that various scenarios will be explored
with, and without, the major alternatives.
Continuing the presentation, Mr. Henderson provided an overview of the followin!¥
Alternative Nos. 7a, and 7b, apprising the Council, as follows: That the Resource Agencies favor these options,
The negative impacts associated with these options due to bringing traffic onto the
215 freeway above the City.
For Councilman Pratt, Mr. Smith relayed that ultimately there could be mu tple options
implemented to address the various traffic needs, that implementations could include limited
access facilities (i.e., freeways), and circulation element roadways; noted the benefits of this
comprehensive review, incorporating all the elements associated with the project. Mr.
Henderson provided additional information regarding integrating the traffic solutions with land
uses, and the MSHCP.
R:\Minutes\041701
6
Continuing the presentation1 Mr. Henderson elaborated regard n,q the followin,q'
The dedicated transit line being preserved, as projects are developed along the existing
Highway 79 (South). Mr. Studor additionally relayed that the transit corridor (mass transit)
continues up to the existing San Jacinto Branch line.
The 4th component to the Integrated Project, the Special Area Management Plan (SAMP),
which is a program of the Corps of Engineers which allows the County to develop an
overall management plan for the aqueduct resources that exist in an area, and would aid in
the permitting process of the proposed routes.
The watershed areas which will be studied in order to integrate this element with the
project.
Relaying that Mr. Zappe, from Riverside County Flood Control & Conservation District was
available for questions of the City Council, Mr. Henderson concluded his presentation, thanking
the City Council and staff for their time in considering the RCIP issues; and relayed that County
staff will be back in three months for an update.
Ms. A. McGregor, 34555 Madera De Playa Drive, relayed concern regarding truck traffic on the
highways, smog, and water availability, recommending that the times of truck transportation on
the highways be limited, that reclaimed water be utilized to water landscaping, and that trees
requiring large amounts of water be restricted from being planted.
2 Morgan Hill Specific Plan No. 31,3
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Provide direction to staff.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tern Roberts moved to continue this item off calendar. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
There were no additional comments.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
There were no additional comments.
R:\Minutes\041701
7
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:28 P.M., Mayor Comerchero formally adjourned the City Council meeting to Tuesday, April
24, 2001 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California.
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:\Minutes\041701
8
ITEM 3
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the
Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby
allowed in the amount of $2,048,010.27.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 12th day of June, 2001.
ATTEST:
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:/Resos2OO1/Resos 01-
1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 01- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 12 th day of June, 2001 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNClLMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:/Resos2001/Resos 01-
2
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
05/17/01 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
05/24/01 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
05,'31/01 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
06/12/01 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
05/24/01 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 06/t2/01 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001
165
190
192
193
194
195
210
220
261
280
300
310
32O
33O
34O
GENERAL FUND
RDA-LOW/MOD INCOME HOUSING
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL R
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND
MARGARITA ROAD REIMB DIST
CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND
RDA-REDEVELOPMENT
INSURANCE
VEHICLES
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
SUPPORT SERVICES
FACILITIES
001
165
190
192
193
194
280
3O0
320
330
340
GENERAL FUND
RDA-LOW/MOD INCOME HOUSING
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
RDA-REDEVELOPMENT
INSURANCE
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
SUPPORT SERVICES
FACILITIES
TOTAL BY FUND:
$ 788,975.55
249,503.10
146,667.14
643,985.67
218,878.81
$ 2,048,010.27
496,712.12
9,883.87
151,711.38
30,674.39
39,659.38
1,068.61
156,288.12
39,369.32
62.69
2,900.00
529.22
1,702.90
764.58
2,163.60
4r144.74
$ 1,829,131.46
218,878.81 '
2,048~010.27
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 10
05/17/01 09:04 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FURD TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
AMOUNT
53,654.12
1,077.35
55,297.99
30,631.17
1,282.36
609,743.17
18,170.11
9,156.14
7,413.49
2~549.65
TOTAL 788,9~5.55 ,/
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1
05/17/01 09:04 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
69185 05/17/01
69186 05/17/01
69187 05/17/01
69188 05/17/01
69189 05/17/01
69189 05/17/01
69190 05/17/01
69191 05/17/01
69191 05/17/01
69192 05/17/01
69192 05/17/01
69193 05/17/01
69193 05/17/01
69194 05/17/01
69194 05/17/01
69195 05/17/01
69196 05/17/01
69197 05/17/01
69197 05/17/01
69197 05/17/01
69197 05/17/01
69197 05/17/01
69197 05/17/01
69197 05/17/01
69197 05/17/01
69197 05/17/01
69197 05/17/01
69197 05/17/01
69197 05/17/01
69197 05/17/01
69197 05/17/01
69198 05/17/01
69199 05/17/01
69199 05/17/01
VENDOR
NUMBER
001985
004246
003304
VENDOR
NAME
A E P (ASSOC OF ENVIRO
ACME SCREEN PRINTING
ADAMS ADVERTISING INC
ADAMS, SUSAN
004054 ADKISON ENGINEERS INC
004054 ADKISON ENGINEERS INC
ALLARD, CARI
ALTERNATIVE FIRE PROTEE
ALTERNATIVE FIRE PROTEC
004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSE
004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSE
004022 AMERICAN MINI STORAGE~
004022 AMERICAN MINI STORAGE,
000101 APPLE ONE~ INC.
000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
003266 ARCUS DATA SECURITY
004509 ART & FRAME WAREHOUSE
002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C
002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C
002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C
002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C
002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C
002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C
002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C
002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C
002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C
002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C
002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C
002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C
002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C
002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C
004206 BANUELOS, TERESA
004040 BIG FOOT GRAPHICS
004040 BIG FOOT GRAPHICS
69200 05/17/01 003567
69200 05/17/01 003567
C C MYERS INC
C C MYERS INC
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
MEMBERSHIP: THOMAS THORNSLEY
SOFTBALL TOURNAMENT AWARDS
BILLBOARD UPDATE:JAZZ FESTIVAL
REFD:ARTS/CRAFTS-DRAWING CLASS
APR SURVEY SVC:IST STREET BRDG
APR SURVEY SVCS:ADD~L MATERIAL
REFD:ARTS/CRAFTS~DRAWING CLASS
REFUND:OVRPMT 899-3774
REFUND:OVRPMT 899-3774
CITY LIMITS BLO00 DRAWS-PD/CHP
CITY LIMITS BLO00 DRAWS-PD/CHP
CITY RECORDS STORAGE UNIT Cl15
B&S STORAGE UNIT B109
TEMP HELP W/E 04/28 BRUNER
TEMP HELP W/E 4/28 DICLEMENTE
OFFSITE RECORDS STORAGE
FRAMES FOR AERIAL PHOTOS:PALA
MEMBERSHIP:AUSTIN,M.64444391
MEMBERSHIP:BURON~B.88550918
MEMBERSHIP:NURST,R. 88551635
MEMBERSHIP:ISAACSON,R.25186684
MEMBERSHIP:KANIGOWSKI 88552294
MEMBERSHIP:MCBRIDE,J.10687563
MEMBERSNIP:NORRIS~M.19990969
MEMBERSHIP:OSVOLD,H.16354762
MEMBERSHIP:PELLETIER 88551874
MEMBERSRIP:ROOEEKER 52094984
MEMBERSNIP:SMITHoCLAY 56429280
MEMBERSHIP:ETERLING,S.88552252
MEMBEREHIP:TIDWELL,R.63295026
MEMBERBHIP:WEDEKING,B.88552356
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
DAY CAMP T-SHIRT DESIGNS
DESIGN SPRING EGG HUNT ARTWORK
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-161-999-5226
190-187-999-5313
280-199-999-5250
190-183-4982
280-199-807-5804
280-199-807-5804
190-183-4982
001-171-4036
001-171-4037
001-170-999-5528
001-170-999-5328
001-120-999-5277
001-162-999-5234
001-162-999-5118
001-162-999-5118
001-120-999-5277
001-165-999-5250
001-162-999-5214
001~164-601-5250
001-164-601-5214
001~164-601~5250
190-180-999-5214
001-163-999-5250
001-162-999-5214
190-180-999-5214
001-162-999-5214
001-164-601-5250
190-180-999-5214
001-164-601-5214
190-180-999-5214
190-183-999-5330
190-185-999-5370
190-183-999-5370
REL RETENTION PW95-11 OVLD/I15 210-2035
WARRANTY RET-PW95-110VRLD/I15 210-2035
ITEM
AMOUNT
100.00
153.73
450.00
36.00
2,145.00
752.50
36.00
438.00
144.00
335.00
21.00
124.00
124.00
278.52
520.00
125.50
200.00
53.00
43.00
43.00
53.00
43.00
53.00
43.00
53.00
43.00
43.00
53.00
43.00
43.00
43,00
170.00
250.00
100.00
671,216.71
65,835.46-
CHECK
AMOUNT
100.00
153.7'5
450.00
36.00
2,897.50
36.00
582.00
356.00
248.00
798.52
125.50
200.00
652.00
170.00
350.00
605,381.25
VOUCHRE2
05/17/01 09:04
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 2
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
69201 05/17/01
69202 05/17/01
69203 05/17/01
69203 05/17/01
69204 05/17/01
69205 05/17/01
69206 05/17/01
69206 05/17/01
69206 05/17/01
69207 05/17/01
69208 05/17/01
69209 05/17/01
69210 05/17/01
69211 05/17/01
69212 05/17/01
69213 05/17/01
69214 05/17/01
69214 05/17/01
69214 05/17/01
69214 05/17/01
69215 05/17/01
69215 05/17/01
69215 05/17/01
69215 05/17/01
69215 05/17/01
69215 05/17/01
69215 05/17/01
69215 05/17/01
69216 05/17/01
69217 05/17/01
69217 05/17/01
69218 05/17/01
69219 05/17/01
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
004228 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY
004093 CARDIO CARE PLUS
000137 CHEVRON U S A INC
000137 CHEVRON U S A INC
CLARK~ JAN
COLLINS, DEBBIE
001193 COMP U S A INC
001193 COMP U S A INC
001193 COMP U S A INC
000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS
001014 COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS
004123 D PHARES & ASSOCIATES
001393 DATA TICKET INC
004526 DESTINATION TEMECULA
004417 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY
004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN
002981 DYNA MED
002981 DYNA MED
002981 DYNA MED
002981 DYNA MED
001380 E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
001380 E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
001380 E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
001380 E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
001380 E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
001380 E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
001380 E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
001380 E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
000523 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP
004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP
000164 ESGIL CORPORATION
002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERIN
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
RECREATION SUPPLIES FOR TCC
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES
REFUND: EX-CATALINA EXPRESS
REFUND:GYMNASTICS-TODDLERS
MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
REPLACE FRNT DOOR MAGS:WEDDING
FACADE IMPR PRGM:WAVES OF HAIR
JUNE SATELLITE OFFICE RENTAL
MAR PEKING CITATION PROCESSING
CA TOURISM OFFICIALS TRANSPORT
CRAFT SUPPLIES-FAMILY FUN NGHT
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
AQUATIC SUPPLIES-SPR/SUMMER
AQUATIC SUPPLIES-SPR/SUMMER
AQUATIC SUPPLIES-SPRG/SUMMER
AQUATIC SUPPLIES-SPRG/SUMMER
TEMP HELP W/E 05/04 RUSH
TEMP HELP W/E 05/04 EBON
TEMP HELP W/E 05/04 EBON
TEMP HELP W/E 05/04 HANSEN
TEMP HELP W/E 05/04 HANSEN
TEMP HELP W/E 05/04 HANSEN
TEMP HELP W/E 05/04 OB~L~NN
TEMP HELP W/E 05/04 HERR
95366-02 DIEGO DR LDSCP
ELECT SUPPLIES: CRC
ELECT SUPPLIES: CRC
APRIL PLAN CHECK REVIEWS
BOX LUNCHES:MUSEUM EXCURSION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-184-999-5301
190-183-999-5330
001-170-999-5262
001-110-999-5263
190-183-4986
190-183-4982
320-199-999-5242
320-199-999-5242
320-199-999-5242
190-185-999-5250
280-199-813-5804
001-170-999-5229
001-170-999-5250
001-111-999-5270
190-183-999-5371
190-180-999-5263
190-186-999-5301
190-186-999-5301
190-186-999-5301
190-186-999-5301
001-161-999-5118
340-199-701-5118
340-199-702-5118
001-164-604-5118
001-161-999-5118
001-120-999-5118
001-171-999-5118
001-162-999-5118
193-180-999-5240
190-182-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
001-162-999-5248
190-185-999-5250
ITEM
AMOUNT
31.41
368.00
57.85
30.21
80.00
36.00
170.51
9.12
12.78
65.00
1,947.53
1,661.73
624.00
300.00
59.77
490.61
10.16
'1.79
17.46
3.08
1,896.39
853.80
284.60
133.17
1,036.41
683.22
1,197.63
2,286.40
193.96
71.17
1~.67
2,2B0.39
64.35
CHECK
AMOUNT
31.41
368.00
88.06
80.00
36.00
192.41
65.00
1,947.53
1~661.73
624.00
300.00
59.77
490.61
32.49
8,371.62
193.96
248.84
2,220.39
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 3
05/17/01 09:04 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
69219
69220
69221
69221
69222
69222
69222
69222
69222
69222
69222
69222
69223
69224
69225
69225
69225
69225
69226
69227
69227
69227
69227
69227
69227
69228
69229
69230
69230
69230
69230
69231
69232
69233
69233
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERIN SALES TAX
002037 EXPANETS
000478 FAST SIGNS
000478 FAST SIGNS
000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS IHC
000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS IHC
000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS IRC
000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
004310 FEDEX GROUND INC
000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
003347 FIRST GANKCARD CENTER
003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M
004178 FREEDOM SIGNS
004178 FREEDOM SIGNS
004178 FREEDOM SIGNS
004178 FREEDOM SIGNS
004178 FREEDOM SIGNS
004178 FREEDOM SIGNS
~ARLAND, MICHAEL
GEANAKOS, KATHY
000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY
GUPTA, GEETA
000378 HAFELI, THOMAS
000378 HAFELI, THOMAS
PHONE MNTC & REPAIRS:CITY HALL
12-N0 TRESPASSING SIGNS
SALES TAX
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
GROUND EXPRESS PACKAGE SERVICE
LOT BOOK REPT: GORDON
XX-9277 R.ROBERTS:APTA & CALED
XX-0432 ELMO:ECO PRESS/MTGS
XX-0432 ELMO:ECO PRESS/NTGS
XX-0432 ELMO:ECO PRESS/MTG$
PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
FACADE IMPR PRGM: LOPEZ MRKT
FACADE IMPR PRGM:TEM POLICE
FACADE IMPR PRGM:CLASSIC TOUCH
FACADE IMPR PRGM:TALCOTT COMP.
FACADE IMPR PGM:RANCHO GRAPHIC
FACADE IMPR PRGM:SAN DIEGO CO.
REFUND: EX-CATALINA EXPRESS
REFUND: PICNIC SHELTER
MUSEUM FILE CABINET
OFFICE SUPPLIES-MUSEUM
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-TCSD
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-SE CTR
ALARM MONITORING:STOREFRONT
REFUND: EX-CATALINA EXPRESS
REIMB:HP K60 PRINTER FOR PRATT
REIMB:SIERRA COHF:4/30-5/04/01
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-185-999-5250
320-199-999-5215
190-182-999-5242
190-182-999-5242
001-110-999-5230
001-150-999-5230
001-162-999-5230
001-162-999-5230
190-180-999-5230
001-161-999-5230
001-110-999-5230
001-111-999-5230
280-199-999-5230
165-199-999-5250
001-100-999-5258
001-162-999-5260
001-1990
001-162-999-5220
001-150-999-5250
280-199-813-5804
280-199-813-5804
280-199-813-5804
280-199-813-5804
280-199-813-5804
280-199-813-5804
190-183-4986
190-183-4989
190-185-999-5242
190-185-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-181-999-5220
001-170-999-5229
190-183-4986
320-199-999-5242
320-199-999-5258
ITEM
AMOUNT
4.83
54.00
411.00
30.83
58.53
12.92
64.59
179.13
32.94
32.85
12.92
23.71
70.95
150.OO
1,475.91
86.96
90.39
121.45
695.00
1,460.00
992.50
1,067.50
1,067.50
1,210.00
800.00
160.00
25.00
493.43
12.86
153.73
131.54
60.00
120.00
322.49
178.41
CHECK
AMOUNT
69.18
54.00
441.83
417.59
70.95
150.00
1,774.71
695.00
6,597.50
160.00
25.00
791.56
60.00
120.00
500.90
69234 05/17/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE IRC HARDWARE SUPPLIES - FIRE DEPT 001-171-999-5212 53.80
VOUCHRE2
05/17/01 09:04
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
69234 05/17/01
69234 05/17/01
69235 05/17/01
69235 05/17/01
69236 05/17/01
6923? 05/17/01
69238 05/17/01
69239 05/17/01
69240 05/17/01
69241 05/17/01
69241 05/17/01
69242 05/17/01
69243 05/17/01
69244 05/I?/01
69244 05/17/01
69245 05/17/01
69246 05/17/01
69246 05/17/01
69247 05/17/01
69248 05/17/01
69249 05/17/01
69249 05/17/01
69249 05/17/01
69249 05/17/01
69250 05/17/01
69250 05/17/01
69250 05/17/01
69250 05/17/01
69250 05/17/01
69250 05/17/01
69250 05/17/01
69251 05/17/01
69252 05/17/01
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC
000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC
001013 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS &
001013 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS &
003198 NONE DEPOT, THE
NOSPICE OF THE VALLEYS
003622 I C M A - MEMBERSHIP
00151? INTEGRATED INSIGHTS DBA
001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL
004119 J T B SUPPLY COMPANY IN
004119 J T B SUPPLY COMPANY IN
004079 JERKERS & GILCHRIST
000203 JOBS AVAILABLE IRC
005666 JOHNS MOTORCYCLES
003666 JOHNS MOTORCYCLES
003223 K E A ENVIRONMENTAL, IN
001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
KERR, PAT
003986 KEVIN COZAD & ASSOCIATE
004500 KIEFER SPORTS GROUP
004500 KIEFER SPORTS GROUP
004500 KIEFER SPORTS GROUP
004500 KIEFER SPORTS GROUP
004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS IRC
004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC
004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS ]NC
004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS IRC
004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC
004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS IHC
004104 K]NETIC SYSTEMS IRC
001282 KNORR SYSTEMS ]NC
004122 KRUEGER, KIMBERLEE
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
MISC HARDWARE SUPPLIES-MUSEUM
MISC HARDWARE SUPPLIES-MUSEUM
SALES TAX CONSULTING SERVICES
SALE5 TAX RECOVERY FEES
RES IMPR PRGM:GRUNAUER(DOOR)
RFD:SECURITY DEPOSIT MS00-2156
MEMBERSHIP: SHAWN D. NELSON
EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PRGM
POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS
TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT
TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT
APR PROF LEGAL SERVICES
RECRUITMENT ADS:ASSOC PLANNER
REPAIR MNTC FOR POLICE ATV
REPAIR MNTC FOR POLICE ATV
APR BIOLOGICAL SVC:PALA RD BAD
TEMP HELP W/E 04/29 DARNER
TEMP HELP W/E 5/6 DANIELS/DAMN
REFUND: GYMNASTICS-RNYTH KIDZ
APR SURVEY SVC:OLD TWA THEATER
DIVE BRICKS FOR AQUATICS
DIVE STICKS FOR SUIM LESSONS
EGG FLIPS FOR SWIM LESSONS
FREIGHT
INSPECT COMPRESSOR @ CRC GYM
HVAC PREVENTIVE MNTC:CITY HALL
HVAC PREVENTIVE MNTC:MNTC FAC
HVAC PREVENTIVE MNTC:CRC
HVAC PREVENTIVE MNTC:TCC
HVAC PREVENTIVE MNTC:MUSEUM
HVAC PREVENTIVE MNTC:SR CTR
MISC POOL SUPPLIES - CRC
REIMB:SIERRA CONF:4/30-5/4/01
PAGE 4
ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
190-185-999-5301 59.97
190-185-999-5242 70.45 184.22
001-140-999-5248 900.00
001-140-999-5248 959.09 1,859.09
165-199-813-5804 927.35 927.35
190-2900 100.00 100.00
001-110-999-5226 960.29 960.29
001-150-999-5248 502.20 502.20
190-186-999-5250 221.99 221.99
001-164-602-5242 172.00
001-164-602-5242 295.63 467.63
001-130-999-5247 130.47 130.47
001-150-999-5254 92.00 92.00
001'170'999'5214 76.53
001-170-999-5214 ?6.53 155.06
210-165-631-5801 512.50 512.50
001-161-999-5118 532.00
001-161-999-5118 425.60 957.60
190-183-4982 36.00 36.00
210-190-167-5802 2,400.00 2~400.00
190-186-999-5301 32.95
190-186-999-5301 59.50
190-186-999-5301 99.50
190-186-999-5301 16.10 208.05
190-182-999-5416 240.00
340-199-701-5250 675.00
540-199-702-5250 37.50
190-182-999-5250 453.~5
190-184-999-5250 93.75
190-185-999-5250 112.50
190-181-999-5250 37.50 1,650.00
190-186-999-5212 191.56 191.56
320-199-999-5258 105.74 105.74
VOUCHRE2
05/17/01 09:04
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 5
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
69253 05/17/01 004062
69253 05/17/01 004062
69254 05/17/01 004051
69255 05/17/01 001719
69256 05/17/01 000945
69256 05/17/01 000945
69257 05/17/01 002654
69258 05/17/01 004087
69259 05/17/01 004141
69259 05/17/01 004141
69259 05/17/01 004141
69259 05/17/01 004141
69259 05/17/01 004141
69259 05/17/01 004141
69260 05/17/01 004107
VENDOR
NAME
KUSTOM SIGNALS INC
KUSTOM SIGNALS INC
L 0 R GEOTECHNICAL GROU
L P A INC
L P S COMPUTER SERVICE
L P S COMPUTER SERVICE
LITELINES INC
LOWE'S
MAINTEX INC
MAINTEX INC
MAINTEX INC
MAZNTEX INC
MAINTEX INC
MAINTEX INC
MASSA-LAVITT, SANDRA
69261 05/17/01 MASTER POULS
69261 05/17/01 MASTER POOLS
69261 05/17/01 MASTER POOLS
69262 05/17/01 003448 MELODYS AD WORKS
69263 05/17/01 004208 MILANOS
69263 05/17/01 004208 MILANOS
69264 05/17/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
69264 05/17/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
69264 05/17/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
69264 05/17/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
69265 05/17/01 MISSION POOLS, INC.
69265 05/17/01 MISSION POOLS, INC.
69265 05/17/01 MISSION POOLS, INC.
69266 05/17/01 003715
69266 05/17/01 003715
69267 05/17/01 004391
69268 05/17/01 001599
69269 05/17/01 004191
69270 05/17/01 004401
MORTON TRAFFIC MARKINGS
MORTON TRAFFIC MARKINGS
NATIONAL AIR INC
NORTH COUNTY BASKETBALL
NORTH COUNTY TIMES-PMT
NU VISION PRODUCTIONS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
RADAR SMART COMPUTER KIT-POLIC
SALES TAX
APR GEOTECH SVC:IST ST. BRIDGE
REIMBURSABLES:TEM LIBRARY PRJT
HP PRINTER SUPPLIES
HP PRINTER SUPPLIES
BANNER ARM ASSEMBLY REPLACEMNT
HARDWARE SUPPLIES-SR CENTER
CREDIT: ITEMS RETURNED
TCC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
TOD CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL CUSTODIAL SERVICES
VAR PARKS CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
CRC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
5/01-5/11/01 CONSULTING SVCS
REFUND:FEE OVERPMT:B01-1061
REFUND:FEE OVERPMT:BOl-1061
REFUND:FEE OVERPMT:B01-1061
MARKETING:DIXIELAND JAZZ FEST.
REFRESHMNTS:HARVESTON MTG:5/08
REFRSNMNTS:RORAPAUGH MTG:5/09
BUSINESS CARDS:M.MEDEIROS (PD)
SALES TAX
BUSINESS CAROS:LS/TA/LW
BUSINESS CARDS:LS/TA/LW
REFUND:DUPL PMT:B01-1115
REFUND:DUPL PMT:B01-1115
REFUND:DUPL PMT:B01-1115
STENCIL PAINT FOR PW MAINT.
SALES TAX
REPAIR 2 HVAC UNITS @ STN #84
BASKETSALL UMPIRE SERVICES
RENEW SUBSCRIPTION 5/23-11/22
VIDEO EDIT SVCS:EVERY 15 MINS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-170-502-5610
001-170-502-5610
280-199-807-5804
210-199-129-5802
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
280-199-999-5271
190-181-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
190-184-999-5212
190-18/+-999-5212
340-199-701-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
001-161-999-5248
001-162-4285
001-162-4200
280-199-999-5250
001-161-999-5260
001-161-999-5260
001-170-999-5222
001-170-999-5222
001-162-999-5222
001-162-999-5222
001-162-4285
001-162-4200
001-2290
001-164-601-5218
001-16/+-601-5218
001-171-999-5212
190-187-999-5250
190-180-999-5228
001-170-999-5371
ITEM
AMOUNT
3,000.00
225.00
3,090.00
893.21
950.72
402.05
376.31
161.12
37.75-
9.78
2.80
213.42
160.82
63.50
1 ~972.35
324.50
243.38
5.37
2,000.00
60.80
129.20
40.02
3.00
54.70
68.66
273.50
101.25
1.12
2,070.00
155.25
223.95
102.00
61.00
161
CHECK
AMOUNT
3,225.00
3,090.00
893.21
1,352.77
376.31
161.12
412.57
1,972.35
573.25
2,000.00
190.00
166.38
375.87
2,225.25
223.95
102.00
61.00
161.25
VOUCHRE2
05/17/01 09:04
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
69271 05/17/01 002292 OASIS VENDING
69271 05/17/01 002292 OASIS VENDING
69272 05/17/01
69272 05/17/01
69272 05/17/01
69273 05/17/01
69273 05/17/01
69273 05/17/01
69273 05/17/01
69273 05/17/01
69273 05/17/01
69273 05/17/01
69274 05/17/01
69275 05/17/01
69276 05/17/01
69276 05/17/01
69276 05/17/01
69277 05/17/01
69278 05/17/01
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
CITY HALL SUPPLIES/SERVICE
MAIHT FAC SUPPLIES/SERVICE
003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S
003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S
003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S
OFFICE SUPPLIES:P.D.SATELLITE
OFFICE SUPPLIES:P.D.SATELLZTE
OFFICE SUPPLIES:FINANCE
002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MINT
002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & ~LRINT
002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MINT
002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
002105 OLD TC~N TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & ~LRINT
001619 ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER RECRUITMENT AD:ASSOC PLANNER
ORANGE EMPIRE CHAPTER I ANNUAL ICBO MGRSHP FEES:A.ELMO
002734 P V P COMMUNICATIONS IN
002734 P V P COMMUNICATIONS IN
0027~4 P V P COMMUNICATIONS IN
PD MOTORCYCLE HELMET
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
340-199-701-5250
340-199-702-5250
001-170-999-5229
001-170-999-5229
001-140-999-5220
001-162-999-5214
001-162-999-5214
001-164-601-5214
001-164-601-5214
001-164-601-5214
001-165-999-5214
001-165-999-5214
001-150-999-5254
001-162-999-5226
001-170-999-5243
001-170-999-5243
001-170-999-5243
PAUDA VALLEY ELEMENTARY REFUND:SEC.DEPOSIT:MS01-1086 190-2900
REFUND:EXCURS~CATALINA EXPRESS
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMSURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETERS, MARIANNE
69279 05/17/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69279 05/17/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69279 05/17/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69279 05/17/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69279 05/17/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69279 05/17/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69279 05/17/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69279 05/17/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69279 05/17/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69279 05/17/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69279 05/17/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69279 05/17/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69279 05/17/01 000249 PETTY GASH
69279 05/17/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69279 05/17/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69279 05/17/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69279 05/17/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69279 05/17/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69279 05/17/01 000249 PETTY CASH
692?9 05/17/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69279 05/17/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69279 05/17/01 000249 PETTY CASH
000580 PHOTO bORKS OF TEMECULA APR FILM/PHOTO DEV - PLANNING
69280 05/17/01
190-183-4986
001-101-999-5280
190-183-999-5370
190~181-999-5301
190-181-999~5301
001-2175
190-184-999-5212
280-199-999-5260
001-161-999-5260
001-161-999-5260
001-161-999-5260
190-182-999-5242
190-180-999-5260
190-180-999-5301
190-184-999-5301
001-140-999-5260
00t-164-601-5260
001-110-999-5220
190-184-999-5301
001-140-999-5260
001-164-603-5212
001-161-999-5260
001-161-999-5260
001-161-999-5220
ITEM
AMOUNT
364.51
70.82
90.60
116.46
23.88
403.91
212.79
185.09
278.89
19.15
313.25
155.94
335.76
40.00
600.00
9.46
42.38
100.00
80.00
21.00
25.06
12.78
11.97
22.96
23.08
15.70
33.47
21.71
41.89
38.6~
7.74
6.93
10.37
16.45
5.58
20.43
20.00
16.~
19.35
2.25
16.11
PAGE 6
CHECK
AMOUNT
435.33
230.94
1,569.02
335.76
40.00
651.84
100.00
80.00
397.79
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 7
05/17/01 09:04 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
69280
69280
69281
69282
69282
69282
69282
69282
69282
69282
69282
69283
69284
69285
69285
69286
69286
69287
69287
69288
69288
69288
69288
69289
69289
69289
69289
69289
69289
69290
69291
69291
69291
69292
69293
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
05/17/01
000580 PHOTO WORKS OF TEMECULA
000580 PHOTO WORKS OF TEMECULA
004478 PRECISION ALIGNMENT & B
000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN
000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN
000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAH
000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN
000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN
000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COHPAN
000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COHPAN
000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN
004519 PYRO SPECTACULARS INC
000635 R & J PARTY PALACE
001364 R C P BLOCK & BRICK INC
00136~ R C P BLOCK & BRICK INC
000981 R H F INC
000981 R H F INC
004494 RAMONA TIRE OF TEMECULA
004494 RAMONA TIRE OF TEMECULA
000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIET
000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIET
000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIET
000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIET
000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS
000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS
000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS
000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS
000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS
000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS
002110 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORAT
000815 ROWLEY, CATHY
000815 ROWLEY, CATHY
000~15 ROWLEY, CATHY
001942 S C SIGNS
SCOTT, SEAM
ITEM ACCO(JNT ITEM CHECK
DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
APR FILM/PHOTO DEV - MUSEUM
APR FILM/PHOTO DEV - TCSD
190-185-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
VEH REPAIR/MAINT:MEDIC SQUAD 001-171-999-5214
DISPLAY AD FOR WESTERN DAYS
DISPLAY ADS:VAR. CONSTR UPDATE
DISPLAY ADS:VAR. CONSTR UPDATE
DISPLAY AD:SPRING EGG HUNT
ADDL DISPLAY AD:SPRING EGG HNT
DISPL AD:SPORTS COMPLEX WRKSHP
DISPLAY AD:CHILDREN'S MUSEUM
APR VAR. PUBLIC NTCS:PLAHNING
280-199-999-5362
001-165-999-5256
001-165-999-5256
190-180-999-5254
190-180-999-5254
210-190-173-5802
190-180-999-5254
001-161-999-5256
DEPOSIT-4TH OF JULY FIREWORKS 190-18.~-999-5370
SUPPLIES-VOL RECOGN CEREMONY 190-183-999-5370
GRAFFITI REMOVER SUPPLIES
GRAFFITI REMOVER SUPPLIES
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
RADAR EQUIP REPAIR & MAINT
RADAR EQUIP REPAIR & MAINT
001-170-999-5215
001-170-999-5215
VEHICLE REPAIR/MAINT:FIRE PREV 001-171-999-5214
PARTS SALES TAX:INV# 1012813 001-171-999-5214
APR 01-02-98000-0 STN #84
APR 01-02-98010-0 STN #8~
VARIOUS WATER METERS
VARIOUS WATER METERS
001-171-999-5240
001-171-999-5240
190-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
DUPL BLUEPRINTS:ER CTR EXPAN. 210-190-163-5804
DUPL BLUEPRINTS:EH CTR EXPAN. 210-190-163-5804
DUPL BLUEPRINTS:CHAPARRAL H.$. 210-190-170-5804
DUPL BLUEPRINTS FOR LAND DEV 001-163-999-5268
OUPL BLUEPRINTS:PALA RD IMPRV 210-165-668-5802
DUPL BLUEPRINTS:lET ST BRIDGE 280-199-807-5804
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FOR PW MAINT 001-164-601-5238
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
APR POSTING PUBLIC NTC SIGNS 001-161-999-5256
REFUND:EEC.DEPOSIT:MS01-0680 190-2900
4.82
17.7-/
104.95
680.00
321.90
704.10
190.80
90.00
225.00
369.00
112.00
12,500.00
244.25
45.04
495.47
59.00
107.96
167.91
7.65
9.62
17~.24
2,550.97
1,088.40
98.68
52.42
170.24
6.45
9.87
44.62
274.13
256.00
256.00
64.00
585.00
100.00
38.70
104.95
2,692.80
12,500.00
244.25
· 540.51
1~.96
175.56
3,822.23
382.28
274.13
576.00
585.00
100.00
69294 05/17/01 003801 SELFVS JANITORIAL SERVI MAY CUSTODIAL SVCS - PARKS 190-180-999-5250 3,440.00
69294 05/17/01 003801 EELF~S JANITORIAL SERVI MAY CUSTODIAL SVC - TEE POOL 190-186-999-5212 210.00
VOUCNRE2
05/17/01 09:04
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
69294 05/17/01
003801 SELF~S JANITORIAL SERVI
69295 05/17/01 000645 SMART & FINAL IRC
69296 05/17/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
69296 05/17/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
69296 05/17/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
69296 05/17/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
69296 05/17/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
69296 05/17/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
69296 05/17/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
69296 05/17/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
69296 05/17/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
69296 05/17/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
69296 05/17/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
69296 05/17/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
69296 05/17/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
69297 05/17/01
69298 05/17/01
001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
69299 05/17/01 004163 SPORTS CHALET
69299 05/17/01 004163 SPORTS CHALET
69299 05/17/01 004163 SPORTS CHALET
69299 05/17/01 004163 SPORTS CHALET
69300 05/17/01 004306 STENO SOLUTIONS
69301 05/17/01 003840 STRONGS PAINTING
69302 05/17/01 000305 TARGET STORE
69302 05/17/01 000305 TARGET STORE
69302 05/17/01 000305 TARGET STORE
69303 05/17/01
69304 05/17/01
69305 05/17/01
69305 05/17/01
69306 05/17/01
69306 05/17/01
001672 TEMECULA DRAIN SERV & P
TEMECULA RADIATOR/AUTO
000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY
000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY
69307 05/17/01 004274
69308 05/17/01 003140
69309 05/17/01
TEMECULA VALLEY NIGH SC
TEMECULA VALLEY HIGN SC
TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT
TEMECULA VALLEY TAEKWON
TEMECULA VALLEY VOLUNTE
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 8
ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CNECK
DESCRIPTION NUMBER AHOUNT AMOUNT
MAy CUSTODIAL SVC - 6TH ST 001-164-603-5250 210.00 3,860.00
SUPPLIES FOR SPECIAL EVENTS 190-183-999-5370 33.48 33.48
MAY 2-22-331-0400 GEN.KEARNY
MAY 2-06-105-0654 VARIOUS MTRS
MAY 2-22-575-0934 GEN.KEARNY
MAY 2-10-331-1353 STN #84
MAY 2-18-363-1902 PAUSA RD
MAY 2-22-057-2226 VARIOUS MTRS
MAY 2-22-057-2234 MARGARITA
MAY 2-22-496-3462 GEN.KEARNY
MAY 2-00-397-5059 VARIOUS MTRS
MAY 2-01-202-7330 VARIOUS MTRS
MAy 2-01-202-7603 VARIOUS MTRS
MAY 2-05-791-8807VARIOUS MTRS
APR 2-20-140-9299 VARIOUS MTRS
MAY 095-167-7907-2 STN #84
STN ~ PEST CONTROL SERVICES
DEBEERS SOFTBALLS
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
GLOBAL POSITIONING SYS FOR P.D
TRANSCRIPTION SVCS:P.D.
POWER WASH OLD TWN CHURCH & RR
OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PW DEPTS
OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PW DEPTS
OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PW DEPTS
6TH ST PUBLIC R.R. PLUMBING SV
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS:FIRE
190-180-999-5519 32.03
190-180-999-5319 2,191.72
190-180-999-5240 100.26
001-171-999-5240 708.98
190-180-999-5319 89.57
190-180-999-5319 76.47
190-180-999-5319 93.34
190-180-999-5319 12.63
190-180-999-5240 3,594.80
192-180-999-5319 30,631.17
190-180-999-5319 11,503.56
190-180-999-5319 6,77'2.15
190-180-999-5319 607.74
001-171-999-5240 180.41
001-171-999-5212 80.00
190-187-999-5301 2,008.80
190-187-999-5301 15.54
190-187-999-5301 150.66
001-170-999-5221 279.48
001-170-999-5250 2~.~
001-164-603-5250 2,200.00
001-163-999-5220 139.69
001-165-999-5220 46.56
001-164-604-5220 232.81
001-164-603-5250 80.00
001-171-999-5214 164.65
001-161-999-5222 142.50
001-161-999-5222 10.69
NAMEPLATE INSERTS:OT REVIEW BD
SALES TAX
REFUND:SEC. DEPOSIT:MSO0-3223 190-2900
ADDL ROOM RENTAL 190-182-4990
CITY HALL LOCKSMITH SVCS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
56,414.42
180.41
80.00
REIMB:VOLUNTEERS SUPPLZES
2,454.48
266.88
2,200.00
419.06
80.00
164.65
153.19
100.00
20.00- 80.00
340-199-701-5212 50.00 50.00
190-183-999-5330 40.00 40.00
001-171-999-5512 3,318.78 3,318.78
VOUCHRE2
05/17/01 09:04
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
HUMBER DATE
69310 05/17/01
69311 05/17/01
69312 05/17/01
69313 05/17/01
69314 05/17/01
69315 05/17/01
69315 05/17/01
69316 05/17/01
69316 05/17/01
69316 05/17/01
69317 05/17/01
69318 05/17/01
69319 05/17/01
69320 05/17/01
69321 05/17/01
69321 05/17/01
69321 05/17/01
69321 05/17/01
69321 05/17/01
69321 05/17/01
69321 05/17/01
69322 05/17/01
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
004001
004440
000332
000332
004261
004E61
004261
004279
TEMECULA VALLEY WINE SO REFUND:SEC.DEPOSIT:MSO0-3287
TRUAX, PAMELA
TUSHAR, MARY ANN
U C REGENTS
UNIVERSITY PRODUCTS INC
REFUND:GYMNASTICS-RHYTH KIDZ
REFUND:EXCURS.CATALINA EXPRESS
TEMECULA CONNECT MTG:6/OS:J.O.
MISC MUSEUM SUPPLIES
VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATE LIBRARY PLAN CHECK SERVICES
VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATE APR PLAN CHECK SERVICES
VERIZON CALIFORNIA
VERIZON CALIFORNIA
VERIZON CALIFORNIA
APR XXX-1408 P.D.SATELLITE STN
MAY XXX-1941 PTA CD TTACSD
MAY XXX-5072 GENERAL USAGE
VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. MAY ACCESS-RVSD CO OPEN LINE
WESTON, RETA
WHITE, SAM
REIMB:SIERRA CONF. 4/30-5/3/01
WHITEMAN, TAMMIE
REFUND:ARTS/CRAFTS-CARTOONING
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
REFUND:SEC.DEPOSIT:MS01-0625
000346 YATES, GRANT
DC50 COLOR COPIER USAGE
LEASE OF DCCS 50 COLOR COPIER
INTEREST FOR DCCS 50 COPIER
COLOR COPIER USAGE
APR LEASE DC220 COPIER
APR MNTC/SUPPLIES DC220 COPIER
APR INTEREST DC220 COPIER
REIMB:EMPL LAW CONF:4/26-27/01
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-2900
190-183-4982
190-183-4986
001-111-999-5260
190-185-999-5250
001-162-999-5248
001-162-999-5248
001-170-999-5229
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
001-140-9~9-5261
190-183-4982
190-2900
330-199-999-5217
330~2800
330-199-999-5391
330-199-999-5217
330-2800
330-199-999-5217
330-199-999-5391
001-110-999-5258
ITEM
AMOUNT
100.00
36.00
120.00
35.00
19.40
2,922.14
4,225.22
316.83
54.85
6,553.45
342.02
139.18
30.00
100.00
6,584.68
278.15
244.40
53.88
129.82
76.98
45.58
30.00
PAGE 9
CHECK
AMOUNT
100.00
36.00
120.00
35.00
19.40
7,147.36
6,925.13
342.02
139.18
30.00
100.00
7,413.49
30.00
TOTAL CHECKS 788,975.55
VOUCNRE2 CITY OF TENECULA PAGE 11
05/24/01 11:19 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FURD TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSO SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSO SERVICE LEVEL D
195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL R
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
220 MARGARITA ROAD REIMB DIST
261 CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ~ CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL
AMOUNT
172,126.90
6,552.42
33,118.90
40.42
4,974.28
353.51
1,050.00
1,225.20
1,295.00
166.50
5,032.99
?,544.34
11,451.16
2,123.23
2,448.25
249,503.10v,///
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1
05/24/01 11:19 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
35264
35264
35264
35264
35264
35264
35264
35264
35264
35264
35264
35264
35264
35264
35264
35264
35264
35264
35264
35264
35264
35264
35264
35264
69323
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
03/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/22/01
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PER$ RET
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERB-PRE
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
000246 PER$ (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
001314 i E S - A P A
APA AWARDS:DU/GT/TT/MM:5/23/01
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2390
165-2390
190-2390
192-2390
193-2390
194-2390
280-2390
300-2390
320-2130
320-2390
330-2390
340-2390
001-2130
001-2390
165-2390
190-2390
192-2390
193-2390
194-2390
280-2390
300-2390
320-2390
330-2390
340-2390
001-161-999-5260
ITEM
AMOUNT
26,505.48
651.49
4,747.71
11.61
415.42
101.44
282.59
127.80
26.51
1,083.44
213.36
589.34
182.91
89.52
1.87
19.07
.05
1.82
.36
.92
.46
3.72
2.65
100.00
293193 05/24/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070 24,297.66
293193 05/24/01 000283 IRSTATAX (IRS) 00028~ FEDERAL 165-2070 420.12
293193 05/24/01 000283 INSTATAX (iRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070 5,123.57
293193 05/24/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 192-2070 16.59
293193 05/24/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 341.84
293193 05/24/01 000283 INSTATAX (iRS) 000283 FEDERAL 194-2070 131.36
293193 05/24/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070 152.94
293193 05/24/01 000283 IRSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070 74.25
293193 05/24/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-2070 1,167.41
293193 05/24/01 000283 INSTATAX (iRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070 272.85
293193 05/24/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 340-2070 503.90
293193 05/24/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 001-2070 5,958.36
293193 05/24/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 165-2070 148.50
293193 05/24/01 000283 iNSTATAX (IRS~ 000283 MEDICARE 190-2070 1,479.96
293193 05/24/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 192-2070 2.63
293193 05/24/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 193-2070 102.41
293193 05/24/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 194-2070 28.18
293193 05/24/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 280-2070 64.48
293193 05/24/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 300-2070 29.24
293193 05/24/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 320-2070 295.64
293193 05/24/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 330-2070 75.81
293193 05/24/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 340-2070 146.35
293223
05/24/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI
001-2070
80.22
CHECK
AMOUNT
35,060.93
100.00
40,834.05
VOUCHRE2
05/24/01 11:19
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CREEK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 2
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
293223 05/24/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
293223 05/24/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
293223 05/24/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
293223 05/24/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
293223 05/24/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
295223 05/24/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
293223 05/24/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
293225 05/24/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
293223 05/24/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
293223 05/24/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
293223 05/24/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
293223 05/24/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
293223 05/24/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
295223 05/24/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
293223 05/24/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
293223 05/24/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
293223 05/24/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
293223 05/24/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
69326 05/24/01
69327 05/24/01
69327 05/24/01
001515 A S A P TRUCK,TRACTOR/F
001502 ADVANCE BUSINESS GRAPHI
001502 ADVANCE BUSINESS GRAPHI
69328 05/24/01 003568 ADVANTAGE BUSINESS EQUI
69329 05/24/01 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSE
69330 05/24/01 004445 AMERICAN PUBLIC NORKS A
69331 05/24/01 000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
69331 05/24/01 000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
69331 05/24/01 000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
69332 05/24/01
69332 05/24/01
003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY
003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY
69333 05/24/01 BAIZA, CATHI
69334 05/24/01
69334 05/24/01
69334 05/24/01
69334 05/24/01
000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER
000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER
000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER
000622 BAMTA ELECTRIC-REFRIDER
69335 05/24/01 BERGSTEIN, ROGER
69336 05/24/01 004262 BIO°TOX LABORATORIES
69336 05/24/01 004262 BIO-TOX LABORATORIES
69337 05/24/01
003817 SLUE RIDGE MEDICAL
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
NEED ABATEMENT: SANTIAGO
PRINTING: PARKING CITATIONS
BALES TAX
CHECK SIGNER SVCS CONTRACT
CITY LIMITS BLO00 DRAWS-PD/CHP
CLEAN NTM ACT SEM:MT/JP:5/31
TEMP HELP N/E 5/5 BRUNER/ROSA
TEMP HELP N/E 05/05 DICLEMENTE
TEMP HELP N/E 05/05 CRAMER
UNIFORM SHIRTS;TCSD MNTC STAFF
SALES TAX
REFUND:ARTS/CRAFTS-ARTISTIC EX
REPAIR FIELD LGNTS:PARK
INSTALL AMp BREAKER:DUCK POND
RELOCATE LGHT SWITCH:CITY HALL
INSTALL ELECT OUTLETS-CRC
REFUND: PICNIC SHELTER
LAB DRUG TESTING:POLICE/CHP
LAB DRUG TESTING:POLICE/CHP
PARAMEDIC SQUAD SUPPLIES:FIRE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
165-2070
190-2070
193-2070
280-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-164-601-5401
001-170-999-5222
001-170-999-5222
001-140-999-5250
001-170-999-5328
001-163-999-5261
001-162-999-5118
001-162~999-5118
190-186-999-5118
190-180-999-5243
190-180-999-5243
190-182-4980
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
340-199-701-5212
190-182-999-5416
190-183-4989
001-170-999-5328
001-170-999-5328
001-171-999-5311
ITEM
AMOUNT
4.89
124.72
2.77
1.39
13.46
8.53
4.24
6,549.02
114.01
1,129.21
1.94
58.06
30.49
46.48
15.34
257.66
62.17
105.22
580.00
1,210.00
90.75
279.00
2T5.00
200.00
624.39
520.00
295.75
175.00
13.13
8.00
235.00
277.00
175.00
525.00
62.00
1,156.70
400.30
522.51
CHECK
AMOUNT
8,609.82
580.00
1,300.75
279.00
273.00
200.00
1,440.14
188.13
8.00
1,210.00
62.00
1,557.00
522.51
VOUCHRE2
05/24/01 11:19
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
69338 05/24/01
69339 05/24/01
69340 05/24/01 003222
69341 05/24/01 003582
69342 05/24/01
69343 05/24/01
69343 05/24/01
SOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
BRACKIN, VIVIAN
BROCKMEIER, CAROL
BROWN JR., WILLIAM E.
CANTRELL, ERIC
000131 CARL WARREN & COMPANY
000131 CARL WARREN & COMPANY
69344 05/24/01 002534
69345 05/24/01
CATERERS CAFE
001197 CBOCOLATE FLORISTi THE
69346 05/24/01 003021
69346 05/24/01 003021
69346 05/24/01 003021
69346 05/24/01 003021
69346 05/24/01 003021
69346 05/24/01 003021
69346 05/24/01 003021
69346 05/24/01 003021
69346 05/24/01 003021
69346 05/24/01 003021
69346 05/24/01 003021
69346 05/24/01 003021
69346 05/24/01 003021
69346 05/24/01 003021
69346 05/24/01 003021
69347 05/24/01
69347 05/24/01
CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL
CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL
CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL
CINGULAN WIRELESS (CELL
CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL
CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL
CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL
CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL
CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL
CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL
CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL
CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL
CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL
ClNGULAR WIRELESS (CELL
CINGULAR WIRELESS (CELL
003735 CINGULAR WIRELESS (EQUI
0037'35 CINGULAR WIRELESS (EQUI
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
REFUND:SECURITY DEPT MS00-1623
REFD:GRADING DEPST LD99-193GR
REIMB:SIERRA COMF:4/30-5/4/01
MILEAGE REIMB-PW SIGNAL TECH
REFUND:EX-CATALINA EXPRESS
CLAIM ADJUSTER SERVICES
CLAIM ADJUSTER SERVICES
REFSHMNTS:CM BUSINESS MTG
THANK yOU CHOCOLATES:TCSD
4/09-5/08/01 CELLULAR PHONE SV
4/09-5/08/01 CELLULAR PHONE SV
4/09-5/08/01 CELLULAR PRONE SV
4/09-5/08/01 CELLULAR PHONE SV
4/09-5/08/01 CELLULAR PHONE SV
4/09-5/08/01 CELLULAR PHONE SV
4/09-5/08/01 CELLULAR PHONE SV
4/09-5/08/01 CELLULAR PHONE SV
4/09-5/08/01 CELLULAR PHONE SV
4/09-5/08/01 CELLULAR PHONE SV
4/09-5/08/01 CELLULAR PHONE SV
4/09-5/08/01 CELLULAR PHONE SV
4/09-5/08/01 CELLULAR PHONE SV
4/09-5/08/01 CELLULAR PHONE SV
4/09-5/08/01 CELLULAR PHONE SV
SALES TAX - CELLULAR PHONE
SALES TAX - CELLULAR PHONE
69348 05/24/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC
69348 05/24/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CBC
69348 05/24/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC
69348 05/24/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC
69348 05/24/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC
69348 05/24/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEAL'TH CHARIT 004405 CHC
69349 05/24/01 002147 COMPLIMENTS COMPLAINTS
69350 05/24/01 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS
69350 05/24/01 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS
002697 CREATIVE LIGHTING INC
002697 CREATIVE LIGHTING INC
69351 05/24/01
69351 05/24/01
FACE PAINTING CLOWN "KITE DAY"
ALARM MONITORING ADD~L CHRGS
REBOOT ALARM SYSTEM @ CRC
VARIOUS PRK SITES LIGHT REPAIR
VARIOUS PRK SITES LIGHT REPAIR
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-2900
001-2670
001-162-999-5261
001-164-602-5262
190-183-4986
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
001-110-999-5260
190-183-999-5370
001-120-999-5208
001-140-999-5208
001-161-999-5208
001-162-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
280-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
001-163-999-5208
001-164-601-5208
001-164-602-5208
001-164-604-5208
001-165-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-110-999-5208
001-150-999-5208
320-199-999-5242
320-199-999-5242
001-2120
190-2120
193-2120
194-2t20
330-2120
340-2120
190-183-999-5371
190-185-999-5250
190-182-999-5250
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
ITEM
AMOUNT
100.00
995.00
283.13
46.57
80.00
1,520.58
712.91
36.74
61.25
89.30
46.28
421.69
586.44
623.76
46.28
507.28
199.34
216.37
87.67
43.84
400.28
472.84
157.22
77.20
11,18
11.18
123.50
5.60
.60
.20
5.50
.60
150.00
2.00
65.00
513.00
1,000.00
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
100.00
995.00
283.13
46.57
80.00
2,233.49
36.74
61.25
3,975.79
22.36
136.00
150.00
67.00
1,513.00
VOUCHRE2
05/24/01 11:19
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 4
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
69352 05/24/01 003625
69353 05/24/01
69354 05/24/01
69355 05/24/01
69356 05/24/01
69356 05/24/01
69356 05/24/01
69356 05/24/01
69356 05/24/01
69357 05/24/01
69357 05/24/01
69357 05/24/01
69358 05/24/01
69359 05/24/01
69360 05/24/01
69361 05/24/01
69362 05/24/01
69362 05/24/01
69362 05/24/01
69362 05/24/01
69362 05/24/01
69362 05/24/01
69362 05/24/01
69363 05/24/01
VENDOR
NAME
DAVIS, JOHN
004450 DENNIS A HIBBERT PLUMEI
002701 DIVERSIFIED RISK
001669 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO
001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP
004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP
004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP
003665 EMERITUS COMMUNICATIONS
ERICKSON, JANET
000164 ESGIL CORPORATION
004223 FEATHERS FROM HEAVEN
000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
000165 FEOERAL EXPRESS INC
000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
69364 05/24/01 003347
69364 05/24/01 003347
69364 05/24/01 003347
69364 05/24/01 00334?
69364 05/24/01 003347
69364 05/24/01 003347
69364 05/24/01 003347
69364 05/24/01 003347
69364 05/24/01 00334?
69364 05/24/01 00334?
69364 05/24/01 003347
69364 05/24/01 003347
693~ 05/24/01 003347
69364 05/24/01 00334?
69364 05/24/01 003347
FEMA/NFIP
FIRST BANXCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKDARD CENTER
FIRST BANNCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST DANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST 8ANKCARD CENTER
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
FIRST 8ANKCARD CENTER
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
REPAIR WTR LINE LEAK:PALA PRK
APR SPECIAL EVENTS PREMIUMS
SUPPLIES FOR GRAFFITI REMOVAL
TEMP HELP W/E 05/04 THURSTON
TEMP HELP W/E 05/04 THURSTON
TEMP HELP W/E 05/04 DAVIS
TEMP NELP W/E 05/04 DROWN
TEMP HELP W/E 05/04 BR~N
CRC STAGE LAMPS
CRC/PHILLIPS 1000~ STAGE LAHPS
SALES TAX
APR LONG DISTANCE PHONE SVCS
REFUND:COOKING-DINNER FOR T~O
PLAN CK REVIEW-INV BALANCE
OLD TWN BRIDGE DEDICATION
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
DIGITIZED FLOOD DATA:CD ROM
XX-3083 NAGGAR:PROF MTG IN TWN
XX-0902 O~GRADY:ASM BILL/CALED
XX'0902 O~GRADY:ASM 81LL/CALED
XX-0902 O~GRADY:ASM BILL/CALED
XX-0902 O'GRADY:ASM BILL/CALED
XX-5288 JONES:CONF & EARTHLINK
XX-5288 JONES:CONF & EARTHLINK
XX-5288 JONES:CONF & EARTHLINK
XX-5288 JONES:CONF & EARTNLINN
XX-5288 JONES:CONF & EARTHLINK
XX-5288 JONES:CONF & EARTRLINK
XX-1405 UENOSKE:PROF MTG/CONF
XX-1405 UBNOSKE:PROF MTG/CONF
XX-1405 UENOSKE:PROF MTG/CONF
XX-6702 MEYER:PROF RDA MTGS
ACC(~JNT
NUMBER
190-183-999-5330
190-180-999-5250
300-2180
001-164-601-5218
190-186-999-5118
190-186-999-5118
190-186-999-5118
001-164-604-5118
001-164-604-5118
190-182-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
320-199-999-5208
190-183-4982
001-2030
280-199-807-5804
001-150-999-5230
001-120-999-5230
001-165-999-5230
190-180-999-5230
001-161-999~5230
001-162-999-5230
001-1990
001-161-610-5606
001-100-999-5260
001-110-999-5258
001-111-999-5258
001-111-999-5260
001-1990
001-100-999-5260
320-199-999-5211
001-100-999-5220
001-120-999-5242
001-120-999-5261
001-120-999~5258
001-161-999-5260
001-161-999-5258
001-1990
280-199-999-5260
ITEM
AMOUNT
160.00
480.00
337.03
101.86
534.40
491.52
73.06
3,275.31
410.19
45.40
341.00
28.98
1,762.32
30.00
2,783.77
385.00
12.92
32.61
12.92
12.92
14.82
19.55
3.42
53.30
51.36
150.24
438.00
337.37
135.96
112.17
104.01
150.46
961.70
20.04
403.14
34.95
104.39
513.49
37.83
CHECK
AMOUNT
160.00
480.00
337.03
101.86
4,784.48
415.38
1,762.32
30.00
2,783.77
385.00
109.16
53.30
3,555.11
VOUCHRE2
05/24/01 11:19
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
69365 05/24/01
69366 05/24/01
69367 05/24/01
69367 05/24/01
69367 05/24/01
69368 05/24/01
69369 05/24/01
69370 05/24/01
69371 05/24/01
69371 05/24/01
69371 05/24/01
69371 05/24/01
69371 05/24/01
69371 05/24/01
69371 05/24/01
69372 05/24/01
69373 05/24/01
69373 05/24/01
69373 05/24/01
69374 05/24/01
69375 05/24/01
69375 05/24/01
69376 05/24/01
69377 05/24/01
69378 05/24/01
69379 05/24/01
69380 05/24/01
693§1 05/24/01
69381 05/24/01
69382 05/24/01
69383 05/24/01
69383 05/24/01
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
FLORES, ELIZABETH
FO~LER, KATHY
000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
004242 HARMONY ARTISTS INC
HEERw JAMES P.
003622 I C M A - MEMBERSHIP
000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
000194 C M A RETIREMENT TAUS
000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
000194 C M A RETIREMENT TAUS
001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL
000750 INTOXIMETERS
0007'50 INTOXIMETERS INC
000750 INTOXIMETERS INC
001186 IRWIN, JOHN
003046 K F R 0 G 95.1 FM RADIO
003046 K F R 0 G 95.1 FM RADIO
KELLER, JOMI
001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
000205 KIDS PARTIES ~TC
000206 KIMKOS INC
KLING, SANDRA
001534 LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV
001534 LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV
000210 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES
003286 LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVI
003286 LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVI
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
REFUND: SPORTS-BB FUND-BEG.
REIMB:SIERRA COMF:4/30-5/04/01
TOSHIBA NOTEBOOK BATTERY
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
ENTERTAINMENT DEPST:JULY 4TN
B&S INSPECTOR-MILEAGE REIMB.
MEMBERSHIP: JAMES B. O~GRADY
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS
ALCO-SENSOR IV FOR POLICE DEPT
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
BROADCASTING DIXIELAND EVENT
BROADCASTING DIXIELAND ~EBSITE
REFUND:SUMMER DAY CAMP
TEMP HELP W/E 5/13 DANIELS
CINCO DE MAYO CLO~N/PHTY JUMP
PRINTING:DIXIELAND POSTERS
REFUND:SECURITY DEPT MS01-1241
AIR:CPRS CONF:3/14-17:MCCARTHY
AIR:COOE HEARINGS:MYERS:4/4-5
NAND8OUK:CA MUNI LAW UPDATE
APR SVCS-LIBRARY SYSTEM AGRMT
REIMB:VOLUNTEER PRGM EXPENSES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-183-4982
001-163-999-5261
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
190-183-999-5370
001-162-999-5262
001-110-999-5226
001-2080
165-2080
190-2080
193-2080
194-2080
280-2080
300-2080
190-186-999-5250
001-170-502-5610
001-170-502-5610
001-170-502-5610
190-183-999-5330
280-199~999-5362
280-199-999-5362
190-182-4984
001-161-99~-5118
190-183-999-5371
280-199-999-5362
190-2900
190-180-999-5258
001-171-999-5261
001-120-999-5228
001-101-99<2-5285
001-101-999-5285
ITEM
AMOUNT
35.00
131.48
199.00
17.97
15.60
712.50
41.40
860.34
2,591.48
445.85
313.50
40.00
16.50
148.62
50.00
372.17
2,760.00
18.97
207.00
200.00
875.00
105.00
145.00
525.35
205.00
322.50
100.00
215.50
145.50
60.00
1,103.20
26.48
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
35.00
131.48
232.57
712.50
41.40
860.34
3,605.95
372.17
2,985.97
200.00
980.00
145.00
525.35
205.00
322.50
100.00
361.00
60.00
1,129.68
VOUGNRE2
05/24/01 11:19
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
69384 05/24/01
69385 05/24/01
69386 05/24/01
69386 05/24/01
69386 05/24/01
69386 05/24/01
69386 05/24/01
69386 05/24/01
69387 05/24/01
69387 05/24/01
69387 05/24/01
69388 05/24/01
69389 05/24/01
69390 05/24/01
69391 05/24/01
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR ITEM
NAME DESCRIPTION
004174 LIGHT IMPRESSIONS VARIOUS SUPPLIES:MUSEUM
000996 LOCAL GOVERNMENT PUBLIC PUB:CA LAND USE 2d UPDATE
003428 M V P TEMECULA SHUTTLE
003428 M V P TEMECULA SHUTTLE
003428 M V P TEMEEULA SHUTTLE
003428 M V P TEMECULA SHUTTLE
003428 M V P TEMECULA SHUTTLE
003428 M V P TEMECULA SHUTTLE
SHTL:SIERRA:TH/KK/GF/KF:4/30
SHTL:SIERRA:TH/KK/GF/KF:4/30
SHTL:SIERRA:TB/KK/GF/KF:4/30
SRTL:SIERRA CF:TH/KK/GF/KF:5/4
SHTL:SIERRA CF:TH/KK/GF/KF:5/4
SHTL:SIERRA CF:TH/KK/GF/KF:5/4
003669 MARC FAULKENBURY PAINTI RES IMPRV PRGM:BEARD
003~9 MARC FAULKENBURY PAINTI RES IMPRV PRGM:SMALL
003669 MARC FAULKENBURY PAINTI RES IMPNV PRGM:YOUNG
000944 MODAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY I TOOLS/EQUIP FOR TRAF SGNL MNTC
002~7 MCKINLEY EQUIPMENT CORP MAINT FAC LIFT MAINTENANCE
MCMILLIAN DEVELOPMENT REFUND:MARG RD REIMBURSEMENT
001905 MEYERS, DAVID WILLIAM TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
69392 05/24/01 004208 MILANOS
69392 05/24/01 004208 MILANOS
69392 05/24/01 004208 MILAMOS
69392 05/24/01 004208 MILANOS
69393 05/24/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
69393 05/24/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
69393 05/24/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
69393 05/24/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
69393 05/24/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
69393 05/24/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
69393 05/24/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
69393 05/24/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
69393 05/24/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
69393 05/24/01 00138~ MINUTEMAN PRESS
69393 05/24/01 00138/, MINUTEMAN PRESS
69393 05/24/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
69393 05/24/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
69393 05/24/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
69393 05/24/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
69393 05/24/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
69394 05/24/01 004464 MOBIL BUS[NESS
69394 05/24/01 004464 MOBIL BUSINESS
004162 MONSTER.COM
69395 05/24/01
69396 05/24/01
COUNCIL-BUDGET WRKSNOP:5/15/01
PW TP. AINING MEETING:5/15/01
REFRSHMNT:DEV.PROdECT MTG:5/16
REFRSHMBT:DEV.PROJECT MTG:5/16
ENVELOPES/LETTERNEAD-PLANNING
ENVELOPES/LETTERHEAD-PLANNING
2500 ENVELOPES TCSO
1500 WINDOW ENVELOPES CRC
3000 ENVELOPES MUSEUM
BUSINESS CARDS:GS/SB/MN
BUSINESS CARDS:OA/JB
BUSINESS CARDS:WEST
BUSINESS CARDS:HUGHES
BUSINESS CARDS:BROWN
SALES TAX
SALES TAX
SALES TAX
SALES TAX
BUSINESS CARDS FOR dOB HOTLINE
SALES TAX
CITY VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
CITY VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
RECRUITMENT AD:ASSOC PLANNER
MONTANTE, GERRLD
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-185-999-5250
001-110-999-5228
320-199-999-5261
001-162-999-5261
001'163-999-5261
320-199-999-5261
001-162-999-5261
001-163-999-5261
165-199-813-5804
165-199-813-5804
165-199-813-5804
001-164-602-5242
340-199-702-5250
220-165-4076
190-183-999-5330
001-100-999-5260
001-164-604-5260
001-140-999-5260
280-199-999-5260
001-161-999-5222
001-161-999-5222
190-185-999-5222
190-182-999-5222
190-185-999-5222
001-165-999-5222
001-163-999-5222
001-164-604-5222
001-164-604-5222
001'164-602-5222
001-165-999-5222
001-163-999-5222
001-164-604-5222
001-164-602-5222
001-150-999-5222
001-150-999-5222
001-170-999-5262
330'199-999-5262
001-150-999-5254
REFUND:ENG DEPOS[T:LDOO-191GR 001-2670
ITEM
AMOUNT
145.87
99.54
32.16
42.12
42.12
42.58
55.76
55.76
380.00
410.00
280.00
306.38
115.76
1,295.00
128.00
162.50
68.40
31.25
31.25
417.76
221.74
232.07
97.34
192.37
114.75
76.50
38.25
102.50
38.25
8.33
6.94
6.94
5.56
76.50
5.74
211.17
20.53
295.00
995.00
PAGE 6
CHECK
AMOUNT
145.87
99.54
270.50
1,070.00
306.38
115.76
1,295.00
128.00
293.40
1,641.54
231.70
295.00
995.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 7
05/24/01 11:19 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
69397 05/24/01 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
69398 05/24/01 000?2? NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTIO
69399 05/24/01 004026 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTIO
69400 05/24/01 003686 NETVIZ CORPORATION
69401 05/24/01 003961 NEU HORIZONS
69402 05/24/01 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT
69402 05/24/01 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT
69402 05/24/01 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT
69402 05/24/01 002139 NORTR COUNTY TIMES- ATT
69402 05/24/01 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT
69402 05/24/01 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT
69403 05/24/01 003382 O'GRADY, JAMES B.
69404 05/24/01 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S
69404 05/24/01 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S
69405 05/24/01 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
69405 05/24/01 002105 OLD TO~N TIRE & SERVICE
69405 05/24/01 002105 OLD TO~N TIRE & SERVICE
69405 05/24/01 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
69405 05/24/01 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
69405 05/24/01 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
69405 05/24/01 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
69405 05/24/01 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
69406 05/24/01 000733 PARTY PZAZZ
69407 05/24/01 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO
69408 05/24/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69408 05/24/01 000249 PETTY CASN
69408 05/24/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69408 05/24/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69408 05/24/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69408 05/24/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69408 05/24/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69408 05/24/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69408 05/24/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69408 05/24/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69408 05/24/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69409 05/24/01 000580 PHOTO WORKS OF TEMECULA
69409 05/24/01 000580 PHOTO WORKS OF TEMECULA
69410 05/24/01 002185 POSTMASTER - TEMECULA
ITEM ACCOUNT
DESCRIPTION NUMBER
GRADING VARIOUS CITY ROADS 195-180-999-5402
VARIOUS PUBLICATIONS FOR FIRE 001-171-999-5228
RENEW MEMBERSHIP:NORRIS:936424 001-171-999-5226
MAINT AGRMNT 6/1/01-5/31/02 320-199-999-5211
BEG.HTML4 CLASS:K.BEAL:8/28/01 001-161-610-5261
RECRUITMENT AD:ASSOC PLANNER 001-150-999-5254
RECRUITMENT AD:ENGINEER INTERN 001-150-9~9-5254
RECRUIT AO:SR AEC/AEC ASSIST 001-150-999-5254
DISPLAY AD:4/OB:SPRING EGG NNT 190-180-999-5254
DISPLAY AD:4/12:SPRING EGG HNT 190-180-999-5254
NEWSPAPER AD:EVERY 15 MIN PGRM 001-170-999-5371
REIMB:LOBBYING ABl137:5/17/01 001-111-999-5260
LABEL PRINTER FOR MEDIC SQUAD 001-171-999-5220
SALES TAX 001-171-999-5220
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
SALES TAX
190-180-999-5214
340-199~701-5214
001-164-601-5214
001-164-601-5214
190-180-999-5214
001-162-999-5214
001-162-999-5214
001-162-999-5214
LINEN RENTAL:COUNCIL MTG:5/15 001-100-999-5260
001958 PERS L-T 001-2122
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASN REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
001-161-999-5260
190-180'999-5261
190'183-999-5371
190-185-999-5301
190-183'999-5370
190-180'999'5260
190'187-999-5301
190-183-999-5370
001-164-604-5260
001-100-999'5260
001'100'999-5260
APR FILM/PHOTO DEV - CIP
APR FILM/PHOTO DEV - ECON DEV
ANNUAL STD(A) BULK MAIL FEE
001-165-999-5250
001-111-999-5270
330-199-999-5230
ITEM
AMOUNT
1,050.00
481.98
115.00
240.00
325.00
75.00
67.50
110.00
1~7.93
84.69
1,098.72
17.04
149.99
11.24
58.39
469.19
37.50
19.15
35.53
28.50
68.17
5.11
43.75
115.36
6.00
10.00
26.97
6.93
15.62
19.64
17.16
14.39
5.99
35.00
15.50
27.03
51.37
125.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,050.00
481.98
115.00
240.00
325.00
1,613.84
17.04
161.23
721.54
43.75
115.36
173.20
78.40
125.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 8
05/24/01 11:19 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
69411
69412
69412
69412
69413
69413
69414
69414
69414
69414
69414
69414
69414
69414
69414
69414
69414
69415
69416
69417
69417
69417
69417
69417
69417
69418
69418
69419
69420
69421
69421
69421
69421
69421
69421
69422
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
RADICAN, DIANNE
004272 RANCHO ARMY NAVY
004272 RANCHO ARMY NAVY
004272 RANCHO ARMY NAVY
000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST
000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST
000907 RANCHO CAR WASH
000907 RANCHO CAR WASH
000907 RANCHO CAR WASH
000907 RANCHO CAR WASH
000907 RANCHO CAR WASH
000907 RANCHO CAR WASH
000907 RANCHO CAR WASH
000907 RARCHO CAR WASH
000907 RANCHO CAR WASH
000907 RANCHO CAR WASH
000907 RANCHO CAR WASH
003591 RENES COMMERCIAL HANAGE
002110 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORAT
002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
000955 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF SW
000955 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF SW
001097 ROADLINE PROOUCTS INC
ROBERSON, LISA
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CAL]F EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
REFUND:BUMMER DAY CAMP
PARACHUTES-EVERY 15 MIN PRGM
TIES FOR CORONER TAGS
SALES TAX
190-182-4984
001-170-999-5371
001-170-999-5371
001-170-999-5371
MAY VARIOUS WATER METERS
MAY VARIOUS WATER METERS
CITY VEHICLE DETAILING
CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS
CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS
CITY VEHICLE OETAILING
CITY VEHICLE DETAILING
CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS
CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS
CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS
CITY VEHICLE DETAILING
CITY VEHICLE DETAILING
CITY VEHICLE DETAILING
DEBRIS RMVL/WEED ABATE:VAR CHN
190-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
001-162-999-5214
001-110-999-5214
001-110-999-5263
001-165-999-5214
001-163-999-5214
001-161-999-5263
001-161-999-5214
001-161-999-5214
001-164-604-5214
001-164-601-5214
190-180-999-5214
001-164-601-5401
EQUIP RENTAL - PW MNTC CREWS
MAR 2001 LEGAL SERVICES
MAR 2001 LEGAL SERVICES
MAR 2001 LEGAL SERVICES
MAR 2001 LEGAL SERVICES
MAR 2001 LEGAL SERVICES
MAR 2001 LEGAL SERVICES
001-164-601-5238
001-130-999-5246
190-180-999-5246
300-199-999-5246
280-199-999-5246
261-199-999-5246
210-165-631-5801
FRONTIER DAYS PATROL SVC:4/07 001-170-999-5370
CYSTIC FIBROSIS WALK:4/29/01 001-170-999-5370
STENCIL TRUCK SUPPLIES:PW 001-164-601-5218
REFUND:GYMNASTICS-YOUNG TOODLR 190-183-4982
MAY 2-21-518-0340 HWY 79 190-180-999-5319
MAY 2-21-981-4720 HWY 79 210-165-631-5801
MAY 2'21-560-5874 MARGARITA 190-180-999-5319
MAY 2-07-626-6063 VARIOUS MTRS 195-180-999-5240
APR 2-21-911-7892 S.SIDE PK LT 210-165-828-5804
APR 2-19-999-9442 VARIOUS MTRS 190-180-999-5319
CRC PEST CONTROL SERVICES 190-182-999-5250
ITEM
AMOUNT
310.00
84.96
15.00
7.49
930.58
3,805.58
35.OO
30.99
80.81
15.00
14.00
11.00
14.12
3.12
7.00
28.00
28.00
4,500.00
145.14
39,641.56
68.50
4,588.18
2,397.45
166.50
1,107.50
427.00
204.00
353.25
36.00
144.53
29.13
38.22
11.80
88.57
1,782.85
90.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
310.00
107.45
4,736.16
267.04
4,500.00
145.14
47,969.69
631.00
353.25
36.00
2,095.10
90.00
69423 05/24/01 003467 SPECTRUM POOL PRODUCTS REPLACEMENT PARTS - CRC POOL 190-1~-999-5242 258.00
69423 05/24/01 003467 SPECTRUM P~L PROOUCTS FREIGHT 190-1~-999-5242 12.44 270.44
VOUCHRE2
05/24/01 11:19
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 9
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
69424 05/24/01
69425 05/24/01
004531 SPENCE, MARJORIE LEE
004163 SPORTS CHALET
69426 05/24/01 004163 SPORTS CHALET
69427 05/24/01
69427 05/24/01
004503 STEEL GRIP SYSTEMS INC
004503 STEEL GRIP SYSTEMS INC
69428 05/24/01 001546 STRAIGHT LINE GLASS INC
69429 05/24/01 003840 STRONGS PAINTING
69430 05/24/01
69431 05/24/01
69432 05/24/01
69433 05/24/0t
69433 05/24/01
69433 05/24/01
69433 05/24/01
69433 05/24/01
69433 05/24/01
69433 05/24/01
69434 05/24/01
69435 05/24/01
69436 05/24/01
69436 05/24/01
69436 05/24/01
69436 05/24/01
69436 05/24/01
69437, 05/24/01
69437 05/24/01
69437 05/24/01
69437 05/24/01
69437 05/24/01
69437 05/24/01
69437 05/24/01
69437 05/24/01
69437 05/24/01
69437 05/24/01
69438 05/24/01
69438 0S/24/01
69438 05/24/01
TEMECULA LITTLE LEAGUE
TEMECULA SISTER CITY
003140 TEMECULA VALLEY TAEKWOR
000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
004030 TEMECULA VOLUNTEER FIRE
003858 TOH RONEY ROOFING
TRANS-PACIFIC CONSULTAN
TRANS-PACIFIC CONSULTAN
TRANS-PACIFIC CONSULTAN
TRANS-PACIFIC CONSULTAN
TRANS-PACIFIC CONSULTAN
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
GRAPHIC DESIGN:HOLIDAY POSTER
DEBEERS SOFTBALLS-SPORTS PRGM
GLOBAL POSITIONING SYS FOR P.D
5 GAL FUSION-CRETE II CRYSTALS
SALES TAX
REPAIR OF MUSEUM WINDOW
PREP WORK/PAINTING O.T. CHURCH
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-180-999-5301
190-187-999-5301
001-170-999-5221
001-164-601-5218
001-164-601-5218
190-185-999-5212
001'164-605-5250
REFUND:SEC.DEPOSIT:MS01-1157 190-2900
SPNSRSHP:TASTE OF WOMLD:6/17
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
APR CITY VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
APR CITY VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
APR CITY VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
APR CITY VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
APR CITY VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
APR CITY VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
APR CITY VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
REIMBURSEMENT FOR TRAINING
RES IMPRV PRGM:ANAYA
REFUND OF FEES:PA01-O047
REFUND OF FEES:PA01-O047
REFUND OF FEES:PA01-O047
REFUND OF FEES:PA01-O047
REFUND OF FEES:PA01-O047
001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP
001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP
001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP
001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP
001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP
001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP
001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP
001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP
001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP
001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP
000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
000389 U S C M WEST COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
001-101-999-5280
190-183-999-5330
001-163-999-5263
001-164-601-5263
001-165-999-5263
001-162-999-5263
001-161-999-5263
190-180-999-5263
340-199-701-5263
001-171-999-5261
165-199-813-5804
001-171-4036
001-161-4105
001-163-4388
001-163-4105
190-180-4107
001-2080
165-2080
190-2080
192-2080
193-2080
194-2080
280-2080
300-2080
520-2080
340-2080
001-2160
165-2160
190-2160
ITEM
AMOUNT
200.00
2,175.00
279.48
451.50
33.86
167.61
3,900.00
100.00
5,000.00
40.00
72.7'5
490.56
71.21
388.34
21.11
577.26
130.54
720.00
3,485.00
186.00
2,798.00
224.00
318.00
355.00
11,333.68
101.16
2,040.22
7.50
168.69
44.50
101,16
88.55
1,416.68
169.46
718.66
100.78
1,119.50
CHECK
AMOUNT
200.00
2,175.00
279.48
485.36
167.61
3,900.00
100.00
5,000.00
40.00
1,751.75
720.00
3,485.00
3,881.00
15,471.60
VOUCHRE2 CiTY OF TEMECULA PAGE 10
05/24/01 11:19 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
69438
69438
69438
69438
69438
69439
69439
69439
69439
69439
69439
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA)
000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA)
000389 U S C M UEST (OBRA)
000389 U S C H WEST (OBRA)
000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA)
002065 UNISOURCE
002065 UNISOURCE
002065 UNISOURCE
0q2065 UNISOURCE
002065 UNISOURCE
002065 UNISOURCE
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
000389 PT RETiR
000389 PT RETiR
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
193-2160
280-2160
320-2160
330-2160
340-2160
11X 17 ASTRO BLUE PAPER
8.5 X 11 GOLDENROD PAPER
8.5 X 11 CHERRY PAPER
8.5 X 11 CANARY PAPER
INDEX TABS FOR COUNCIL AGENDA
SALES TAX
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
ITEM
AMOUNT
23.08
31.60
112.18
71.08
35.40
15.44
142.00
106.50
106.50
157.88
39.63
69440 05/24/01 000325 UNITED NAY 000325 UN 001-2120 127.05
69440 05/24/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 165-2120 8.75
69440 05/24/01 000325 UNITED NAY 000325 UW 190-2120 22.61
69440 05/24/01 000325 UNITED NAY 000325 UW 192-2120 .10
69440 05/24/01 000325 UNITED NAY 000325 UW 193-2120 2.21
69440 05/24/01 000325 UNITED NAY 000325 UN 194-2120 .48
69440 05/24/01 000325 UNITED NAY 000325 UW 280-2120 2.50
69440 05/24/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UN 320-2120 5.00
69440 05/24/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UN 330-2120 5.00
69440 05/24/01 000325 UNITED NAY 000325 UU 340-2120 .60
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
69441
69441
69441
69442
004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA
004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA
004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA
003866 VORTEX DATA SYSTEMS iNC
000339 NEST PUBLISHING COMPANY
000621 WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNC
000621 WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNC
003756 WHITE HOUSE SANITATION
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILL]
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILL]
003607 XPECT FIRST AID
003607 XPECT FIRST AiD
69443
69444
69444
69445
69446
69446
69446
69447
69447
05/24/01
05/24/01
MAY XXX-O073 GENERAL USAGE
MAY XXX-O074 GENERAL USAGE
MAY XXX-3564 GENERAL USAGE
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
ZENNORKB-DESKTOPB:TH:5/21-25 320-199-999-5261
CITY HALL LEGAL PUBLICATIONS 001-120-999-5228
GEM.ASSEMBLY MTG:S/31:J.C./J.O 001-110-999-5260
GEN.ASSEMBLY MTG:5/31:J.C./J.O 001-100-999-5260
MAY CLEANING SVC:BTRFLD STAGE 190-180-999-5250
2 PART NCR PAPER FOR COPY CTR. 330-199-999-5220
3 PART NCR PAPER FOR COPY CTR. 330-199-999-5220
SALES TAX 330-199-9~-5220
FIRST AID SUPPLIES:PW MNTC CRW 001-164-601-5218
FIRST AID SUPPLIES-PN MNTC CRN 001-164-601-5218
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
05/24/01
1,822.85
253.49
54.84
1,995.00
107.50
50.00
50.00
50.00
315.80
329.84
48.42
66.12
198.63
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,212.28
567.95
174.30
2,131.18
1,995.00
107.50
100.00
50.00
694.06
264.~
TOTAL CHECKS 249,503.10
VSUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 7
05/31/01 13:13 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER[OOS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LO~/MOO SET ASIDE
190 COHMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSO SERVICE LEVEL D
195 TCSU SERVICE LEVEL R
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
510 VEHICLES FUND
320 INFORHAT[ON SYSTEMS
SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL
AHOUNT
48,610.06
2,254.10
15,7~7.86
2.80
1,219.74
715.10
945.00
37,094.67
31,295.52
31.~8
538.00
5,595.86
8~.12
2,553.53-
146,667.14~/~
VODCHRE2
05/31/01 13:13
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 1
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMSER
69448 05/30/01 002185
69451 05/31/01 000745
69452 05/31/01 004054
69453 05/31/01 000101
69453 05/31/01 000101
69453 05/31/01 000101
69454 05/31/01 001561
69455 05/31/01 003376
69456 05/31/01 004523
69456 05/31/01 004523
69456 05/31/01 004523
69456 05/31/01 004523
69457 05/31/01 004176
69458 05/31/01
69459 05/31/01 000152
69459 05/31/01 000152
69460 05/31/01 002803
69461 05/31/01
69462 05/31/01 002534
69462 05/31/01 002534
69463 05/31/01 000912
69464 05/31/01 003478
69465 05/31/01 001193
69465 05/31/01 001193
69465 05/31/01 001193
69465 05/31/01 001193
69465 05/31/01 001193
69466 05/31/01 003739
69467 05/31/01 001029
69468 05/31/01 004417
69469 05/31/01 001380
69469 05/31/01 001380
VENDOR ITEM
NAME DESCRIPTION
POSTMASTER - TEMECULA REC BROCHURE BULK MAILING FEE
A T & T WIRELESS SERVIC CELLULAR PHONE SVCS:POLICE DPT
ADKISON ENGINEERS INC
APPLE ONE, INC.
APPLE ONE, INC.
APPLE ONE, INC.
ARCH
ARTS COUNCIL, THE
BREMER, CARL W.
BREMER, CARL W.
BREMER, CARL W.
BREMER, CARL W.
BROADWING
ADDL SVCS:IST STREET EXTENSION
TEMP HELP W/E 05/12 WYTRYKUS
TEMP HELP W/E 05/12 DICLEMENTE
TEMP HELP W/E 05/12 CRAMER
PAGING EQUIPMENT FOR POLICE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-180-999-5230
001-1990
280-199-807-5804
001-162-999-5118
001-150-999-5118
190-186-999-5118
001-170-999-5238
HISTORICAL SOCIETY CELEBRATION 001-101-999-52~
FAC IMPR PRGM:OLD TWN PLAZA
FAC IMPR PRGM:OLD TWN PLAZA
FAC IMPR PRGM:OLD TWN PLAZA
CREOIT:FAC IMPR:OLD TWN PLAZA
LONG DISTANCE & INTERNET SVCS
CALIF CRIME PREVENTION MEMBERSHIP: LYNN FANENE
CALIF PARKS & RECREATIO MEMBERSHIP: HERMAN D. PARKER
CALIF PARKS & RECREATIO MEMBERSHIP:J.CROWE-PELLETIER
CANTY ENGINEERING GROUP APR SVCS:OVRLD OVRCRSS PW95-11
CASTRO, FRANCINE REFUND: A NI6NT IN PARADISE
CATERERS CAFE BOX LUNCHES:SPT CMPLX BUS TOUR
CATERERS CAFE SALES TAX
CITY CLERKS ASSN OF CAL
CLOUD 9 LIMC~JSINE SERVI
CCCA GENERAL MTG:SJ/MB/CD:6/21
AIRPORT TRANSPORTATION:COUNCIL
12-LOGI WHEEL MOUSE OPTICAL
2- 30G8 HARD DRIVE
2- 56K MODEM INTERNAL
10 REMS-HP BRITE WHITE PAPER
SALES TAX
COMP U S A INC
COMP U S A INC
COMP U S A INC
COMP U S A INC
COMP U S A INC
COTTON SELAND ASSOCIATE MAY UPDATE HOUSING ELEMENT
DATAOUICK INC DATAGUICK SOFTWARE RENEWAL
280-199-813-5804
280-199-813-5804
280-199-813-5804
280-199-813-5804
320-199-999-5208
001-170-999-5226
190-180-999-5226
190-180-999-5226
210-165-604-5804
190-184-4980
210-190-1T~-5802
210-190-17'~-5802
001-120-999-5260
001-101-999-5280
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
001-161-999-5248
320-199-999-5211
DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY CRAFT SUPPLIES:FAMILY FUN NGHT 190-183~999-5371
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 05/18 RUSH 001-161-999-5118
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 05/18 EBON 340-199-701-5118
ITEM
AMOUNT
3,127.29
214.30
1,320.00
536.25
104.00
309.40
30.97
2,500.00
11,285.00
11,285.00
8,650.00
2,635.00-
1,195.00
30.00
415.00
130.00
2,580.00
8.00
84.00
6.30
90.00
270.00
359.88
259.98
158.26
80.40
64.39
3,334.00
1,347.00
142.79
1,774.40
853.80
CHECK
AMOUNT
3,127.29
214.30
1,320.00
949.65
30.97
2,500.00
28,585.00
1,195.00
30.00
545.00
2,580.00
8.00
90.30
90.00
270.00
922.91
3,334.00
1,347.00
142.79
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2
05/31/01 13:13 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
69469 05/31/01
69469 05/31/01
69469 05/31/01
69469 05/31/01
69470 05/31/01
69470 05/31/01
69470 05/31/01
69470 05/31/01
69470 05/31/01
69470 05/31/01
69470 05/31/01
69470 05/31/01
69470 05/31/01
69470 05/31/01
69470 05/31/01
69470 05/31/01
69470 05/31/01
69470 05/31/01
69471 05/31/01
69472 05/31/01
69473 05/31/01
69474 05/31/01
69475 05/31/01
69476 05/31/01
69477 05/31/01
69478 05/31/01
69479 05/31/01
69480 05/31/01
69481 05/31/01
69482 05/31/01
69482 05/31/01
69483 05/31/01
69484 05/31/01
69484 05/31/01
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
0001~ FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
0001~ FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
0001~ FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
0001~ FIRST AMERICAN TITLE DO
000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE OD
000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
002819 GARWIN & CRAM ASSOCIATE
003535 GARY HEIMAN PRODUCTIONS
004159 GOUOENOUGH, OONNA
003198 Ht~4E DEPOT, THE
003198 HOME DEPOT, THE
003198 HOME DEPOT, THE
004516 HYPERION OUTFALL SERENA
INTEL ASSOC OF ADMINIST
001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL
000205 KIDS PARTIES ETC
004087 LOWE'S
004087 LOVE~S
004087 LOVE'S
004537 LUMATECN LLC
004537 LUMATECH LLC
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TEMP HELP W/E 05/18 EBON
TEMP HELP N/E 05/18 BROWN
TEMP NELP W/E 05/18 ODMANN
TEMP HELP W/E 05/18 HEER
PAUBA TITLE INFO:NARON PACIFIC
PAUBA TITLE INFO:THOMAS PROPER
PAUBA TITLE INFO:INVESTMENT DE
PAUSA TITLE INFO: TEM VLY CONG
PAUBA TITLE INFO:FAHRION
PAUSA TITLE INFO: EGAN
PAUBA TITLE INFO: KNIGHT
PAUBA TITLE INFO:CHILCOTT
PAUBA TITLE INFO:VAN PH/U4
PAUBA TITLE INFO: YANG
PAUBA TITLE INFO:RILINGTON T32
PAUBA TITLE INFO:RILINGTON T32
PAUBA TITLE INFO:RILINGTON T32
PAUBA TITLE INFO:RILINGTON T32
XX-4117 NUGHES:MNTC STAFF MTG
MISC AUDIO/VIDEO SUPPLIES
VIDEO EQUIPMENT RENTAL & TAPE
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TOOLS & EQUIP FOR PARAMEDICS
EXTREME RECYCLING AWARDS
RES IMPR PRGM: SWALWELL, p.
ENTERTAINMENT:JAZZ FESTIVAL
MEMBERSHIP: GAIL L. ZIGLER
POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS
PARTY JUMP W/ATTENDANT:POLOI, LR
HALLWAY LIGHT 'FIXTURES:SA CTR
SALES TAK
EXTREME RECYCLING AWARDS
SR CTR RETROFIT LED EXIT SIGN
TCC RETROFIT LED EXIT SIGN
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
340-199-702-5118
001-164-604-5118
001-171-999-5118
001-162-999-5118
210-165-606-5801
210-165-606-5801
210-165-606-5801
210-165-606-5801
210-165-606-5801
210-165-606-5801
210-165-606-5801
210-165-606-5801
210-165-606-5801
210~165-606-5801
210-165-606-5801
210-165-606-5801
210-165-606-5801
210-165-606-5801
001-164-604-5260
320-199-999-5210
320-199-999~5210
190-183-999-5330
001-171-999-5242
194-180-999-5265
165-I99-813-5804
280-199-999-5362
190-180-999-5226
190-186-999-5250
190-183-999-5371
190-181-999-5416
190-181-999-5416
194-180-999-5265
190-181-999-5416
190-184-999-5416
ITEM
AMOUNT
284.60
4,115.48
1,349.71
2,286.40
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400,00
400.O0
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
49.59
856.24
800.00
56.00
534.01
138.68
399.00
500.00
63.00
342.28
130.00
149.88
11.24
230.81
180.91
72.36
CHECK
AMOUNT
10,66~.39
5,600.00
49.59
856.24
800.00
56.00
534.01
138.68
399.00
500.00
63.00
342.28
130.00
161.12
230.81
253.27
69485 05/31/01 003428 M V P TEMECULA SHUTTLE SPORTS PARK FAC TOUR TRANSPORT 210-190-173-5802 480.00 480.00
VOUCHRE2
05/31/01 13:13
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 3
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
HUMBER DATE NUMBER
69486 05/31/01
69487 05/31/01
VENDOR ITEM
NAME DESCRIPTION
000394 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTEND RENEW MBA MBRSHP:BH/BS/RW
000394 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTEND SAFETY MNTC/CONSTR ZONES:CS/RI
69488 05/31/01 004141
69488 05/31/01 004141
69488 05/31/01 004141
69488 05/31/01 004141
69488 05/31/01 004141
69488 05/31/01 004141
69488 05/31/01 004141
69488 05/31/01 004141
69488 05/31/01 004141
69488 05/31/01 004141
69488 05/31/01 004141
69489 05/31/01
69490 05/31/01
69491 05/31/01
69492 05/31/01
69493 05/31/01
69493 05/31/01
69493 05/31/01
69493 05/31/01
69493 05/31/01
69494 05/31/01
69494 05/31/01
69495 05/31/01
69495 05/31/01
69495 05/31/01
69496 05/31/01
69496 05/31/01
69496 05/31/01
69497 05/31/01
69498 05/31/01
69499 05/31/01
69499 05/31/01
69500 05/31/01
69501 05/31/01
MAINTEX INC
MAINTEX INC
MAINTEX INC
MAINTEX INC
MAINTEX INC
MAINTEX INC
MAINTEX INC
MAINTEX INC
MAINTEX INC
MAINTEX INC
MAINTEX INC
TCC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
TCC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
TCC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
VAR PARKS CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
TV MUSEUM CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
CRC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
2 PLY WHITE TISSUE FOR 6TH ST.
MULTIFOLD WHITE TOWELS
SANITAIRE VACUUM 12" 7AMP
XLG LATEX DISPOSABLE GLOVES
117104 PINK LUSTER HAND SOAP
003669 MARC FAULKENBURY PAINTI RES IMPRV PRGM: K. YOUNG
004107 MASSA-LAVITT, SANDRA PLANNING CONSULT SVCS:5/16/01
MATLOCK, JEREMY
REFUND:ADMIN CITATION # 0771
MEZA, MARIBEL
REFUND:A NIGHT IN PARADISE
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
BUSINESS CARDS: K. NOLAND
BUSINESS CARDS: D. MYERS
SALES TAX
BUSINESS CARDS: P. COMERCHERO
SALES TAX
000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING GRADING VARIOUS CITY ROADS
000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING CREOIT:BILLING ERROR/INV# 522
002898 NIXON EGLI EQUIPMENT CO MISC. SUPPLIES FOR PW MAINT.
002898 NIXON EGLI EQUIPMENT CO FREIGHT
002898 NIXON EGLI EQUIPMENT CO SALES TAX
002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT VARIOUS RECRUITMENT ADS FOR HR
002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT RECRUITMENT AD:ENGINEERING
002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT RECRUITMENT AD:ASSOC PLANNER
003964 OFFICE DEPOT 'BUSINESS S OFFICE SUPPLIES/FINANCE DEPT
002652 OSCARS RESTAURANT
GIFT CERT./EXTREME RECYCLING
003762 P M X MEDICAL SPECIALTY PARAMEDIC SQUAD SUPPLIES
003762 P M X MEDICAL SPECIALTY PARAMEDIC SGUAD SUPPLIES
PATTERSON, KIMBERLEY REFUND:BEC.DEPOSIT:MS01-0226
003218 PELA
APR PLN CK SVC:MARG RD/H~Y 79S
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001'164-601-5226
001-164-601-5261
190-184-999-5212
190-184-999-5212
190-184-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-185-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
001-164-603-5218
001-164-603-5218
001-164-603-5218
001-164-603-5218
001-164-603-5218
165-199-813-5804
001-161-999-5248
001-161-4255
190-184-4980
001-161-999-5222
001-171-999-5222
001-171-999-5222
001-120-999-5222
001-120-999-5222
195-180-999-5402
195-180-999-5402
001-164-601-5218
001-164-601-5218
001-164-601-5218
001-150-999-5254
001-150-999~5254
001-150-999-5254
001-140-~99-5220
194-180-999-5265
001-171-999-5311
001-171-999-5311
190 - 184 - 4990
001-165-999-5248
ITEM
AMOUNT
90.00
150.00
52.98
111.7'3
105.24
160.82
193.13
294.97
804.10
418.61
220.55
47.16
49.50
1,120.00
496.40
100.00
8.00
41.12
40.02
3.00
102.50
7.69
980.00
35.00-
242.52
7.09
18.19
102.50
72.50
72.50
25.55
300.00
t,863.71
64.24
100.00
129.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
90.00
150,00
2,458.79
1,120.00
496.40
100.00
8.00
194.33
945,00
267.80
247.50
25.55
300.00
1,927.95
100.00
129.00
VOUCHRE2
05/31/01 13:13
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 4
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
69502 05/31/01
PETERS, ROY J. AND PATR
69503 05/31/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69503 05/31/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69503 05/31/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69503 05/31/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69503 05/31/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69503 05/31/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69503 05/31/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69503 05/31/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69503 05/31/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69503 05/31/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69503 05/31/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69503 05/31/01 000249 PETTY CASR
69503 05/31/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69503 05/31/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69503 05/31/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69503 05/31/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69503 05/31/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69503 05/31/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69503 05/31/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69503 05/31/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69503 05/31/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69503 05/31/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69503 05/31/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69503 05/31/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69503 05/31/01 000249 PETTY CASH
69505 05/31/01 000253 POSTMASTER
69505 05/31/01 000253 POSTMASTER
69506 05/31/01 003697 PROJECT DESIGN CONSULTA
69507 05/31/01 000728 RAMSEY BACKFLOW & PLUMB
69508 05/31/01 000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS
69508 05/31/01 000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS
69508 05/31/01 000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS
69508 05/31/01 000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS
69508 05/31/01 000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS
69508 05/31/01 000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS
69508 05/31/01 000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS
69508 05/31/01 000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS
69509 05/31/01 002110 RENTAL SERVICE CORPOP, AT
69509 05/31/01 002110 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORAT
69509 05/31/01 002110 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORAT
69509 05/31/01 002110 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORAT
69510 05/31/01 RIVCOHM, LLC
ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
LANDSCAPE AGREEMENT PAYMENT 210-165-631-5804
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMSURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASR REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
001-110-999-5260
001-110-999-5220
190-183-999-5320
001-171-999-5261
001-171-999-5261
210-190-173-5802
001-110-999-5260
001-110-999-5260
001-111-999-5266
190-181-999-5301
190-1990
190-183-999-5320
190-185-999-5301
001-165-999-5260
001-165-999-5230
001-161-999-5222
001-120-999-5222
001-120-999-5222
001-162-999-5220
210-190-173-5802
001-1990
001-1990
001-100-999-5265
190-183-999-5320
001-162-999-5260
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
001-161-~-5230
001-120-999-5230
MAR-APR DSGN SVC:PAUBA RD IMPR 210-165-606~5802
BACKFLOW REPLACEMENT:VAR SLOPE 193-180-999-5212
DUPL BLUEPRINTS:SE CTR
BLUEPRINT SUPPLIES-CIP
DUPL BLUEPRINTS:SR CTR
DUPL BLUEPRINTS:SR CTR
SPECIFIC PLAN COPIES-PLANNING
DUPL SLUEPRINTS:MARG RD IMPRV
DUPL BLUEPRINTS:PALA RD IMPRV
DUPL BLUEPRINTS:PALA RD IMPRV
210-190-163-5804
001-165-999-5250
210-190-163-5804
210-190-163-5804
001-161-999-5222
001-165-999-5250
210-165-668-5802
210-165-668-5802
PARTS/SUPPLIES-PW MAINT CREWS
SALES TAX
EQUIP/TOOLS - PW MAINT CREWS
SALES TAX
001-164-601-5215
001-164-601-5215
001-164-601-5242
001-164-601-5242
INSTALL RADIO/CONSOLE-FIRE VEH 310-1910
500.00
9.03
10.74
32.25
36.00
30.10
32.80
15.00
6.02
47.33
2.73
11.45
30.46
3.43
3.75
5.25
5.25
27.40
18.97
7.83
20.20
6.00
30.00
47.74
30.53
26.48
132.00
21.70
14,125.78
892.00
54.28
5.86
630.78
648.90
35.85
26.53
46.44
126.65
215.70
16.21
180.00
13.50
538.00
500.00
496.74
153.70
14,125.78
892.00
1,575,29
425.41
538.00
VODCHRE2 CiTY OF TEMECULA PAGE 5
05/31/01 13:13 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
69511
69512
69513
69513
69514
69515
69515
69515
69515
69515
69515
69515
69515
69516
69516
69516
69517
69518
69519
69519
69519
69519
69519
69519
69519
69519
69519
69519
69519
69519
69519
69519
69519
69519
69519
69519
69519
69519
69519
69519
69519
69519
69519
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/3t/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
05/31/01
000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & RE
002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION
001097 ROADLINE PRODUCTS
001097 ROADLINE PRODUCTS
0006~5 SMART & FINAL INC
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
000293 STADIUM PIZZA
002015 STAR WAY PRODUCTIONS
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP iNSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
ITEM ACCOUNT
DESCRIPTION NUMBER
APR APERTURE CARD DUPLICATES 001-163-999-5250
REIMB:CALTRANS PERMIT:PW98-08 001-16~-604-5271
MISC SUPPLIES - PW MAINT CREWS 001-16~-601-5218
SALES TAX 001-16~-601-5218
FAMILY FUN NIGHTS SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5371
MAY 2-11-007-0455 6TH ST 001-16~-603-5240
MAY 2-10-747-1393 VARIOUS MTRS 190-180-999-5240
MAy 2-14-204-1615 FRNT ST RDIO 340-199-701-5240
MAY 2-18-937-3152 MUSEUM 190-185-999-5240
MAY 2-22-496-3439 VARIOUS MTRS 190-180-999-5319
MAY 2-02-351-4946 6TH ST 190-181-999-5240
MAY 2-18-049-6416 FRONT ST PED 001-164-603-5319
MAY 2-19~171-8568 WED CHAPEL 190~185-999-5240
CITY HALL PEST CONTROL SERVICE 340-199-701-5250
TOD PEST CONTROL SERVICES 190-18~-999-5250
MAINTENANCE FAC PEST CONTROL 340-199-702-5250
EMP RECOGNITION FOR JDF WALK 001-100-999-5265
SOUND SYS:DIXIELAND:5/12-13/01 280-199-999-5362
CREDIT:WORKERS~ COMP PREMIUM 001-2370
CREDIT:~ORKERS' COMP PREMIUM 001-2370
CREDIT:~ORKERS~ COMP PREMIUM 001-2370
APR WORKERS~ COMP PREMIUM 001-2370
APR WORKERS~ COMP PREMIUM 165-2370
APR WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM 190-2370
APR ~RKERS~ COMP PREMIUM 192-2370
APR WORKERS~ COMP PREMIUM 193-2370
APR ~ORKERS~ COMP PREMIUM 194-2370
APR WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM 280-2370
APR WORKERS~ COMP PREMIUM 300-2370
APR WORKERS~ COMP PREMIUM 320-2370
APR ~ORKERS~ COMP PREMIUM 330-2370
APR WORKERS~ COMP PREMIUM 340-2370
~ORKERS COMP PMT/FEBRUARY 2001 001-2570
WORKERS COMP PMT/FESRUARY 2001 165-2370
~ORKERS COMP PMT/FEBRUARY 2001 190-2370
~ORKERS COMP PMT/FEBRUARY 2001 192-2370
WORKERS COMP PMT/FEBRUARY 2001 193-2370
WORKERS COMP PMT/FEBRUARY 2001 194-2370
WORKERS COMP PMT/FEBRUARY 2001 280-2370
~ORKERS COMP PMT/FEBRUARY 2001 300-2370
WORKERS COMP PMT/FEBRUARY 2001 320-2370
WORKERS COMP PMT/FESRUARY 2001 330-2370
~ORKERS COMP PMT/FEBRUARY 2001 340-2370
ITEM
AMOUNT
16.80
857.50
2,007.81
150.59
47.95
237.58
28.11
19.66
527.27
182.35
839.28
138.86
49.71
56.00
36.00
40.00
250.00
750.00
482.80-
440.19-
719.29-
5,339.75
109.58
1,900.47
.80
86.52
11.99
39.93
9.08
104.96
24.36
302.05
5,207.82
109.39
1,823.74
.80
98.85
14.09
39.60
9.08
100.58
22.95
256.87
CHECK
AMOUNT
16.80
857.50
2,158.40
47.95
2,022.82
132.00
250.00
750.00
VOUCHRE2
05/31/01 13:13
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOUS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
HUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
69519 05/31/01
69519 05/31/01
69519 05/31/01
69519 05/31/01
69519 05/31/01
69519 05/31/01
69519 05/31/01
69519 05/31/01
69519 05/31/01
69519 05/31/01
69519 05/31/01
004420 STATE COMp INSURANCE FU
00~20 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU
69520 05/31/01
69521 05/31/01 000305
69521 05/31/01 000305
69522 05/31/01
69523 05/31/01
69523 05/31/01
69523 05/31/01
69523 05/31/01
69523 05/31/01
69524 05/31/01
69525 05/31/01
69525 05/31/01
69525 05/31/01
69526 05/31/01
69527 05/31/01
69527 05/31/01
69527 05/31/01
69528 05/31/01
69529 05/31/01
69529 05/31/01
69529 05/31/01
69529 05/31/01
69530 05/31/01
69530 05/31/01
SWALWELL, PAULETTE
TARGET STORE
TARGET STORE
001672 TEMECULA DRAIN SERV & P
004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT
004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT
004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT
004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT
004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT
003140 TEMECULA VALLEY TAEK~ON
000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
001483 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES
004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA
004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA
004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA
VILLA, DOLORES
001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY I
001342 gAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY I
001342 ~AXIE SANITARY SUPPLY
001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY I
003607 XPECT FIRST AID
003607 XPECT FIRST AID
004319 PACIFIC ROOFING & DESIG
69556 05/31/01
MAR k~)RKERS~ COMP PREMIUM 001-2370
MAR ~ORKERS~ COMP PREMIUM 165-2370
MAR ~ORKERS' COMP PREMIUM 190-2~70
MAR ~ORKERS~ COMP PREMIUM 192-2370
MAR ~ORKERS~ COMP PREMIUM 193-2370
MAR ~IORKERS~ COMP PREMIUM 194-~70
MAR ~ORKERS~ COMP PREMIUM 280'2~70
MAR WORKERS~ COMP PREMIUM 300-2~70
MAR ~ORKERS~ COMP PREMIUM 320-2~70
MAR ~ORKERS~ COUP PREMIUM 330-~70
MAR WORKERS~ COMP PREMIUN
RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEMENT PRGM 165-199-813-5804
REC CLASS SUPPLIES
TEEN PRGM AEC SUPPLIES
190-183-999-5320
190-183-999-5320
CITY HALL PLUMBING SERVICES 340-199-701-5250
OLD TCNN LOCKSMITH SVCS/LABOR
O.T. LOCKSMITH SVCS/MATERIALS
SALES TAX
R.VISTA PRK LOCKSMITH SERVICES
LOCKSMITH SVC FOR VARIOUS PRES
001-164-603-5212
001-16~-603-5212
001-16~-603-5212
190-180-999-5212
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
190-183-999-5330
APR REPAIRS/SVC TO PATCH TRUCK 001'16~-601-5214
APR REPAIR/MNTC PW VEHICLES 001-164-601-5214
CREDIT:OVERCHARGED SALES TAX 001-164-601-5214
APR CONSULT SVC:MURRIETA CREEK 210-165-707-5801
MAY XXX-2626 PD SATELLITE STN
MAY XXX-2676 GENERAL USAGE
MAY XXX-3526 FIRE ALARM
001-170-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
REFUND:A NIGHT IN PARADISE 190-18~-4980
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 340-199-?01-5212
RAINT FAC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 340-199-702-5212
MUSEUM MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 190-185-999-5212
TCC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 190-18~-999-5212
CRC FIRST AID SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5301
SKATE PARK FIRST AID SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5305
REL RETENTION:SPRTS PK:OOO1CSD 210-2035
ITEM
AMOUNT
8,028.37
166.24
2,8~8.38
1.20
142.37
19.53
60.99
13.62
153.88
35.81
436.85
349.89
106.34
84.38
140.00
60.00
80.00
6.00
180.41
44.38
60.00
1,607.90
2,644.55
3.87-
270.00
254.88
33.03
82.26
8.00
81.85
81.85
204.63
81.85
199.37
199.37
11,888.54
PAGE 6
CHECK
AMOUNT
25,878.22
349.89
190.72
140.00
370.79
60.00
4,248.58
270.00
370.17
8.00
450.18
398.74
11,888.54
TOTAL CHECKS 146,~67.14
VOUEHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 3
05/31/01 13:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROd FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY -
340 FACILITIES
AMOUNT
222,321.04
47,566.63
32,183.00
335,962.00
5,412.00
5&1.00
TOTAL 6~3,985.6~J
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1
05/31/01 13:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
69533
69534
69535
69535
69535
69535
69536
69536
69537
69537
69537
69537
69537
69537
69537
69537
69537
69537
69537
69557
69537
69537
69537
69537
69538
69539
69539
69539
69540
69540
69541
69541
69541
69541
69542
69543
69543
69544
69545
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
004054 ADKISON ENGINEERS INC
002187 ANI~LRL FRIENDS OF THE V
002541 SECKER CONSTRUCTION SRV
002541 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRV
002541 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRV
002541 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRV
001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
004239 FISHER MERRIMAN SENGAL
000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES
000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES
000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES
003631 KLEINFELDER INC
003631 XLEINFELDER
004062 KUSTOM SIGNALS
004062 KUSTOM SIGNALS
004062 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC
004062 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC
003286 LIBRARy SYSTEMS & SERVI
004383 MACKENZIE ELECTRIC
004383 MACKENZIE ELECTRIC INC
000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
002256 P & D CONSULTANTS INC
ITEM ACCOUNT
DESCRIPTION NUMBER
IlAR SURVEY SVC:IST STREET BRDG 280-199-807-5804
APRIL ANIHAL CONTROL SVCS 001~172-999-5255
NADA LANE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT
SADDLEWOOD EXCAVATION/GRADING
REPLACE DRAIN PIPE:SADDLEWOOD
R&R A.C.@ DEPORTOLA/VILLA DEL
TEMP HELP W/E 05/04 NAASEH
TEMP HELP W/E 05/04 VOSHALL
001-164-601-5401
193-180-999-5416
193-180-999~5212
001-164-601-5402
001-161-999-5118
001-161-999-5118
APR LDSCP SVCS:NEIGHBORHOOD PX
APR LDSCP SVCS:SPORTS PARKS
APR LDSCP SVCS:MEDZANS
APR LDSCP SVCS:SOUTH SLOPES
APR LDSCP SVCS:NORTH SLOPES
APR LDSCP SVCS: CRC
APR LDSCP SVCS: SR CENTER
APR LDSCP SVCS= CITY HALL
APR LDSCP SVCS: TCC
APR LDSCP SVCS:STATION 84
APR LDSCP SVCS:OLD TNN PRKLOT
APR LDSCP SVCS:OLD T~N STSCPE
APR LOSCP SVCS: MUSEUM
190-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999~5415
193-180-999-5415
190-182-999-5415
190-181-999-5415
340-199-701-5415
190-184-999-5415
001-171-999-5212
001-164-603-5415
001-164-603-5415
190-185-999-5415
APR LDSCP SVCS:NEIGHSORHOOD PK 190-180-999-5415
APR LDSCP SVCS:GHILDREN MUSEUM 190-180-999-5415
APR LDSCP SVCS:NADA LN FLD CTR 190-180-999-5415
MAY DESIGN SVC:OLD TWN THEATER
~AR-MAY PLAN CHECK SVCS
MAR-MAY PLAN CHECK SVCS
N/C PREMIUM FOR INV 01.13 SVC
210-190-167-5802
001-163-999-5248
001-163-999-5248
001-1182
GEOTEC SVCS:PALA BRDG PW97-15
GEOTEC SVCS:PALA BRDG P~97~15
2-SIGNAL RADARS FOR POLICE DPT
TALON STATIONARY
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
210-165-631~5801
210-165-631-5801
001-170-502-5610
001-170-502-5610
001-170-502-5610
001-170-502-5610
APR SVCS-LISRARY SYSTEM AGRMT 001-101-999-5285
PRGS PMT#4:S.P.LIGHTING:O019CS 210-190-174-5804
RET.N/H PMT~4:S.P.LIGHTING 210-2035
REMOVE SILT/DEBRIS - MARG CHNL 001-164-601-5401
APR BLDG INSPECTOR SVCS 001-162-999-5118
ITEM
AMOUNT
5,412.00
7,575.99
5,645.00
4,180.00
3,775.00
8,506.50
5,324.00
2,328.12
11,635.00
25,325.00
1,975.00
13,375.00
8,878.00
1,444.00
361.00
541.00
193.00
400.00
250.00
987.00
285.00
1,000.00
155.00
165.00
24,000.00
50.00
5,800.00
31.01~
14,581.00
2,384.00
4,068.00
1,545.00
45.00
420.98
11,233.00
27,5~.50
2,~59.95-
15,000.00
16,837.90
CHECK
AMOUNT
5,412.00
7,575.99
22,106.50
7,652.12
66,969.00
24,000.00
5,818.99
16,965.00
6,078.98
11,233.00
24,839.55
15,000.00
16,837.90
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEHECULA PAGE 2
05/31/01 13:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
69547
69547
69548
69548
69548
69549
69549
69550
69550
69551
69551
69551
69551
69551
69551
69551
69551
69551
69551
69552
69553
69553
69554
69555
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE RUHBER NAME
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
06/12/01
004538 PAULEY EQUIPMENT COHPAN
00~538 PAULEY EQUIPMENT CUMPAR
003697 PROJECT DESIGN CONSULTA
003697 PROJECT DESIGN CONSULTA
003697 PROJECT DESIGN CONSULTA
004318 R J BULLARD CONSTRUCTIO
004318 R d BULLARD CONSTRUCTIO
004498 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC
004498 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC
000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 0
000406 RIVERSIOE CO SHERIFFS D
000406 RIVERSIOE CO SHERIFFS D
000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
000406 RIVERSIOE CO SHERIFFS D
000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
004496 SPARKS EXHIBITS & ENVIR
004456 T & M CONSTRUCTION
004456 T & M CONSTRUCTION
003599 T Y LIN INTERNATIONAL
003730 gEST COAST ARBORISTS IN
ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUHT AMOUNT
UTILITY VEHICLE FOR TCSD
SALES TAX
190-180-999-5610
190-180-999-5610
JAN CONSULT SVCS:MURRIETA CRK
FEB CONSULT SVCS:MURRIETA CRK
CREDIT:BILLING ERROR
RET.N/H PMT~FJ:PALA SOUNDgALL
PRGS PMT~r~:PALA SOUND~RLL:9715
210-165-602-5802
210-165-602-5802
210-165-602-5802
210-2035
210-165-631-5804
PRGS PMT#1:TRF SGNL CONVERSION 210-165-618-5804
RET.g/H PMT#1:TRF SONL CORVRSN 210-2035
RATE AOJ FYO0-01 LAg ENFORCENN
PJ~TE ADJ FYO0-01 LAg ENEORCENH
RATE ADd FYO0-01 LAg ENFORCEMN
RATE ADd FYO0-01 LAg ENFORCEMN
RATE AOJ FYO0-01 LAg ENFORCEMN
RATE ADd FYO0-01 LAg ENFORCRMN
RATE AOJ FYO0-01 LAg ENFORCEMN
RATE ADd FYO0-01 LAg ENFORCEMN
RATE ADd FYO0-01 LAg ENFORCEMN
RATE ADJ FYO0-01 LAg ENFORCEMN
001'170-999-5288
001-170-999-5299
001-170-999-5298
001-170-999-5294
001-170-999-5297
001-170-999-5303
001-170-999-5291
001-170'~9-5281
001-170-999-5262
001-170-999-5279
CHILDRENS MUSEUM DSON NORKSHOP 210-190-165-5802
RET.W/H PMT#2:HAINT FAC:PgO016 210-2035
PRGS PMT#2:NAINT FAC:PWO0-16 210-190-158-5804
APR/RAY DSGN SVCS:MURRIETA CRK 210-165-710-5802
CITYgIOE TREE MAINTENANCE SVCS 001-164-601-5402
6,515.00
~.~
15,009.42
13,568.97
5.43-
8,571.03-
85,710.34
91,419.33
9,141.93-
58,208.04
20,163.96
10,238.40
3,256.38
6,138.72
6,659.70
1,26~.00
8,863.98
5,715.01
3,498.67
30,000.00
1,937.48-
19,374.80
34,730.46
12,328.70
7,003.63
28,572.96
77,139.31
82,277.40
124,006.86
30,000.00
17,437.32
34,730.46
12,328.70
TOTAL CHECKS 643,985.67
ITEM 4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FIN~E~
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OFTEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Genie Robeds, Director of Finance~
June 12, 2001
City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 2001
PREPARED BY:
Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director
Pascale Brown, Senior Accountant -~
RECOMMENDATION:
Report as of April 30, 2001.
That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's
DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio,
receipts, and disbursements are required by Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004
respectively. Attached is the City Treasurer's Report which provides this information.
The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635
as of Apdl 30, 2001.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
Attachments:
1. City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 2001
City of Temecula
City Treasurer's Report
As of April 30, 2001
Cash Activity for the Month of April:
Cash and Investments as of Apdl 1, 2001
Cash Receipts
Cash Disbursements
Cash and Investments as of Apd130, 2001
$ 58,067,947
4,837,405
(2,203.289)
$ 60,702,063
Cash and Investments Portfolio:
Type oflnvestment
Petty Cash .
General Checking
Sweep Account
(Money Market Account)
Benefit Demand Deposits
Local Agency Investment Fund
Certificate of Deposit
(Retention Escrow)
Various
(Retention Escrow)
Checking Account
(Parking Citations)
Trust Accounts- CFD 88-12
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Account- CFD 88-12
(Investment Agreement)
Delinq, Main, Reserve Account - CFD 88-12
(Investment Agreement)
Trust Accounts- CFD 98-1
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Account- CFD 98-1
(Local Agency Investment Fund)
Trust Accounts-TCSD COPs
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Account-TCSD COPs
(Investment Agreement)
Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Account-RDA Bonds
(Investment Agreement)
Institution Yield
Maturity/ Contractual/
Termination Market Par/Book
Date Value Balance
City Hall n/a
Union Bank n/a
Union Bank 3.810 %
(Highmark U.S. Treasury)
Union Bank n/a
State Treasurer 5,760 %
Community Bank 4.360 %
U.S. Bank Vadous
Union Bank n/a
U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 4.770 %
CDC Funding Corp 5,430 % 9/1/2017
CDC Funding Corp 5,422 % 9/1/2017
U,S. Bank (First Am, Treasury) 4.770 %
State Treasurer 5.760 %
U,S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 4.770 %
Bayerische Landesbank 6,870 % 10/1/2012
U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 4.770 %
Bayedsche Landesbank 7.400 % 2/1/2013
1,500 $ 1,500
294,513 294,513 (1)
328,000 328,000
1,668 1,668
54,369,263 54,369,263 (2)
273,861 213,861
249,044 249,044
4,810 4,810
250,938 250,938
1,531,469 1,531,469
500,000 500,000
622 622
943,400 943,400
258 258
502,690 502,690
1,107 1,107
1,448,920 1,448,920
$ 60,702,063
(1)-This amount is net of outstanding checks.
(2)-At Apdl 30, 2001 total market value (including accrued interest) for the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) was $50,437,374,330.
The City's proportionate share of that value is $54,571,180.
All investments are liquid and currently available.
The City of Temecula's portfolio is in compliance with the investment policy. Adequate funds will be available to meet
budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next six months.
ITEM 5
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
~(~usan W. Jones
ity Clerk/Director of Support Services
June 12, 2001
Approval of Election Resolutions
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE'.,~,_
ClTY MANAGER
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, REQUESTING THE SERVICES OF THE COUNTY
REGISTRAR OF VOTERS TO CONDUCT THE GENERAL
MUNIClPALELECTIONTO BEHELD ONTUESDAY, NOVEMBER
6,2001
2. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING
OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2001, FOR THE ELECTION OF
CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF
THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO
GENERAL LAW CITIES
BACKGROUND: Pursuant to the Elections Code, a municipality may request of the County
Registrar of Voters to consolidate with the General Election, to conduct the Municipal Election,
to canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election, and to hold the election in all respects
as if there were only one election. This request must be made in the form of a resolution, which
delegates the powers and duties of the Election Officer for the City of Temecula to the County
Elections Department. This delegation does not include services routinely conducted by the City
Clerk such as advertising requirements for filing periods and all campaign filings including
nomination papers and campaign statements.
The second resolution that the Council is being asked to adopt is the formal resolution
calling and giving notice of the election. This is a requirement of the State of California Election
Code relating to General Law Cities. It also authorizes the City Clerk to give notice of the
election in the time, form and manner required bythe Election Code.
The repot[ does not preclude the City from adding a resolution regarding the Wolf Creek
Referendum Petitions which will be heard in court on June 29, 2001.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Operating Budget.
$60,000 has been budgeted for the election in the FY 2001/2002
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. 01- Requesting the Services of the Registrar
Resolution No. 01- Calling Election
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, REQUESTING THE SERVICES OF THE COUNTY
REGISTRAR OF VOTERS TO CONDUCT THE GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER
6, 200t
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula, California, has called a General
Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 6, 2001, for the purpose of the election of
three (3) members ofthe City Council and
WHEREAS, it is desirable that the General Municipal Election be conducted by the County
Registrar of Voters on November 6, 2001 within the City establishing the precincts, polling places
and election officers, and that the Registrar of Voters of the County of Riverside canvass the retums
of the General Municipal Election;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section '1. That pursuant to Sections 10002 and 10403 of the Elections Code of the
State of California, the Registrar of Voters of the County of Riverside is hereby requested to conduct
the General Municipal Election on Tuesday, November 6, 2001, for the purpose of the election of
two (3) Members of the City Council of the City of Temecula currently held by Jeff Comerchero, Ron
Roberts and Jeffrey E. Stone.
Section 2. That, except for those services routinely conducted by the City Clerk,
delegation is hereby made to the county elections department of the powers and duties of the
elections officer for the City of Temecula to conduct said election in accordance with all applicable
laws and procedures. The election shall be held in all respects as if there were only one election,
and only one form of ballot shall be used for each of the three (3) affected Councilmanic positions.
Section 3. That, in all particulars not recited in this Resolution, said election shall be held
and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections in said City.
Section 4. That the City of Temecula recognizes that additional costs will be incurred by
the County, by reason of this consolidation, and agrees to reimburse the County for such additional
costs.
Section 5. That the Registrar of Voters of the County of Riverside is hereby authorized,
instructed and directed to give such further or additional notice of said election, in time form and
manner as required.
Section 6. That said Registrar of Voters is hereby authorized to canvass the returns of
said General Municipal Election.
Section 7. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution
with the Board of Supervisors, the county elections department of the County of Riverside and with
the County Clerk.
Resos\election-consolidate 1
Section 8. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 12th day of June, 2001.
Jeff Comerchere, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 01- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at
a regular meeting thereof held on the 12th day of June, 2001, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Resos~election-co nsolidate 2
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF
THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE
HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2001, FOR THE ELECTION
OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF
THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO
GENERAL LAW CITIES.
WHEREAS, under the provisions of the laws relating to general law cities in the State of
California a General Municipal Election shall be held on November 6, 2001, for the election of
Municipal Officers;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of California
relating to General Law Cities, there is called and ordered to be held in the City of Temecula,
California, on Tuesday, November 6, 2001, a General Municipal Election for the purpose of electing
two (3) Members of the City Council for the full term of four years.
Section 2.
required by law.
That the ballots to be used at the election shall be in form and content as
Section 3. That the City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to procure and
furnish any and all official ballots, notices, printed matter and all supplies, equipment and
paraphernalia that may be necessary in order to properly and lawfully conduct the election.
Section 4. That the polls for the election shall be open at seven o'clock AM on the day of
the election and shall remain open continuously from that time until eight o'clock PM of the same
day when the polls shall be closed, except as provided in Section 14301 of the Elections Code of
the State of California.
Section 5. That in all particulars not recited in this resolution, the election shall be held
and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections.
Section 6. That notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and the City
Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to give further or additional notice of the election, in time,
form and manner as required bylaw.
Section 7.
Resolution.
That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
Resos\01 -consolidate 1
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this the 12th day of June, 2001.
ATTEST:
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITYOF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk ofthe City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No.
01- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 12th day of June, 2001, by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Resos\01 -consolidate 2
ITEM 6
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER t'~)
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
Grant Yates, Assistant to the City Manager
June 12, 2001
Back-up generator system for City Hall
PREPARED BY:
Aaron Adams, Sr. Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
(1) Award a contract in the amount $106,200 to Johnson Power Systems for the design,
construction, installation of a 250 kW back up generator system for City Hall
(2) Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed $10,620 which is equal to
10% of the contract amount
(3) Appropriate Capital Project Reserves in the amount of $116,820
BACKGROUND: Currently the City does not have an emergency generator at City Hall.
However, the City does have emergency generators at the Emergency Operations Centers,
including Fire Station 84 and the Community Recreation Center. City Hall is designated as a third
alternative Emergency Operations Center.
In order to access the computer network, and utilize telephone networks while working out of the
Emergency Operations Center, the City must add an emergency generator system to City Hall. This
project was recently added for consideration within the Capital Improvement Plan, (attached).
The need for back up power has been pushed to the forefront with the reality of rolling blackouts this
summer. With this in mind, staff contacted 8 electrical design firms and held an on-site walk through
of City Hall discussing the various possibilities. From this meeting an RFP was issued to interested
firms specializing in design/build generator systems with only Johnson Power Systems submitting a
proposal.
Johnson Power Systems, a design/build firm that offers Caterpillar equipment submitted the
attached proposal for four different scenarios. These scenarios ranged from purchasing a generator
system to power both City Hall and the Maintenance Facility, to City Hall only, to providing power to
only the City's computer room. It is staff's recommendation to select Scenario 2, City Hall only, at a
cost of $106,200. This price includes the design, construction and installation of a 250 kW
generator powerful enough to run City Hall. Johnson Power Systems estimates it will take 10 weeks
to install this equipment.
FISCAL IMPACT: $195,000 is included in the proposed Capital improvement Program
budget for FY 2001-02. Adequate Capital Project Reserves are currently available for the requested
appropriation.
Attachment: Johnson Power Systems Proposal, CIP Project Sheet & Contract
, MAY 04 '01 ~8:26PM JOHNSON POWER SYSTEMS 9E~9'?'~35112
3ohn$.on Power Systems ,,,
May 4~ ~001
City of Temecula
43200 Bminens Park D~vc
Temeculn Ua. 92589
ICE: Emergency Generators
, Wc arc plcaacd to submit ~ budgetery quote far fl~ following d~si~n.a~lbuild s~enarios tim you
Seenarin 1: Oenerator foe CRy }~11 and ~he Mai~e,.ne, e fadlRy. Generator to be moun~d i~ the
nor~w~t coract of thc main parian_,, lot. Budget ~ost ~ludes the following.
1 - New Uaterpillar model 3406 Diesel Powered Packaged El~aic Generntm Set rated at 400 kW
s~mdby, 277/480 VAC, 3 Phase, 60 Herta, with all the smudard equtlnlaent plus the fonowing:
Weatherproof Euclosute
Electronic Oovomot
Base Fuel Ta~k, 1500 Gallons, 52
l~exiblc Fuel I. inca
M~in Line Ckcult Breaker, 3 Pole, 1000 Amp (for City Hill)
Second Main Line Circuit Breaker, ~ Pole, 400 Amp (for Ma~ntenanc~ facility}
~tarting Ba~y, 12 Veil,
Batle~ C~rging All~-matm~ 35 Amp~ 12 Volt
F. ml~ne and (hmerator Co,q~ol Comole, EMCPII
F..xlmu~t Sil~nc,~, Flcxibl~ Con. elm, ~1 Rain
Initial Fill of, Off and Coolant ,
1 - New ;Automatic Transfer Switch t~tcd at 2.000 Amps~ 600VAC. 3 Pole, 3 Plume, with 208 Volt
stealer, Logic Consol, E.xemi~e Tilaar, nad mouuled in a NEMA 3R enclosure (fo~ City Hall_)_
I - New ~.utomat/c Transfer Switch xated at 800 Ampa. 600VAC, 3 Fole, 3 Pbale~ with 208 Volt seedieR,
Logic Con=oL Exercise Timc~, and mou~ted in a NEMA ] =nc, losme (fo; Maintenance facility)
l-Set of Ope~6ou ~nd M~int~uce Map-nh
FOB Teme, cula
* Field Start'up 8entice and Testing (4 houri)
A]~o incl~dc, d iA out BUDGET pricc will be the i~t~lla~on of thla cquilnn~t by a lic~m~d c~,hactor who
on. Price-will include all trcnchln~: conduit, cable, connecuom, and pettings rcqumm mr e complete eno
operable system.
Total Budget Cost $1.~4,6'/~.00
I~liv~/'of thh unlt is about 14 weel~ from da~: of ot~.
CGTERPILLAR'
~qy ~4 '01 BS:26PM JO~OM POWER SYSTEMS 9~c37885112 P.B
:iohnson Power_Systems ,.
Scenario 2: ~lo: for City Hall nnly. ~enerator to be movnted in thc ccnte~ of the
1 - New Caa~rpilla~ model 3306 Diesel Powered packaged Electric (~neretm Set feted at 2~0 kW
sumdby, 120/208 VAC, 3 Phase, 60 Hertz, with ~11 Rte st~md~l cqtdpm~l plus the following:
Weat~f Enclosure
Blecmndc Governor
Base Ft~l Tank, 1000 Gallons, 53 Hot~a
Flexible 1~ Lines
Main t.i~n Circuit IL,°aka, 3 Pole, 1000 Amp
Starti~ Bsttc~, 12 Volt,
Battt~Y Cha~,i~g Alternator, 35 Amp, 12 Volt
l~n~ne and Oenentmr Con~'ol Cor~ole, ILMC~II
Exhaust SUcncor, Plcxible Counoctor, and Rain Cap
· Initial Fill of Oil und Coolant , . .
1 - How Autmnatic Tcsnsf~ Swlt~h zated at 2,000 Amt-, 600¥AC, ~ Pole, .~
with 208 Volt slmsi~ Loide Con~'ol, Exorcise Tin~t, and llloullted in a I~ 31~. enclosuro
1 .Set of Operation and M I t~z'~ ~t
FOB Temecula
,, Field Stsrt up Son, too and Testing (4 hours)
Also included in our BUDGL=T pricc will bc thc installation of this ~utpment by a licensexi conlractor who
will poor's concrotc pad to mount the generator on; as well as a pad to mount the automatic transi'er switch
on. Pric~ will include all t~cnchin~, conduit, cabln, connections, and permits ~quired for a compiete and
operable z)l[cm.
Total Budl~ct Cost $106,200,00
Scena"o 3; Genera~ox fo~ Ci~ Hall comput~ ~unm ~.ud compute~ room A/C only. Gunerntor to be
mounted in the paxld~ lot n4jaccnt to th~ clectrieal ~o~m. Budget cost includes the followins.
1 - New Caterpillar Olympian model DSOP2 Diesel Powered Packaged Elcctrle Geunrator Set
rated st 50 kW standby, 120/480 VAC, ~ Phase, 60 Hertz, with all the stande~d equipment
plt~ the following:
Weatherproof l~ncloaurc
EIr, c~unic Oovemor
Base Fuel Tnnk, 150 Gallons, 35 Hours
M~ Li~ Ci~ui~ B~"kar, 3 Pole
Bettc~ Chtrgiri~ Alternatn~ 35 Amp, 12 Volt
Engine and C, cn~r~tor Control Console, "2001"
Bxl~vst Silencer, Flexible Connector, tnd Rain Cap
Inigal Fill of Oil and Coolant
1 - Blew Automatic TranSit Switch rated at 200 Amps, 600VAC, 3 Pole, ~ Phase, with 20~ Volt
sensin~ Lo~ic Control, Hxl~cisc Timer, n~l mounted hi a I'OtMA ! onclos~c
P,.AI'ERPILLAR'
P.4
, MAY 0~ '01 ~:~?PM JOH~SOM POWER S~ 9~7885112
n Power stems
1 - New 200 Amp Eracrf~cncy penol for the computer mom and cc~put~ A/C units.
' FOB Tem~51a
· picla sm sa, ....... : ..... :---at by a a, d who
~ p~r a c~c~ p~ ~ m~ut ~ g~m~ on, ~ ~U as a pad ~ ~t ~c au~c ~f~ ~
To~ B~ ~t S 29~75,00
· Stenario 4: T~ilcr mountat Ocncretor for City Hell compute~ room m~d comput~ mom A/C.o~. y.
Generator to be uail~ mounted with curd connections for cscy hook up to the braiding.
Bud~Ci cost includes ~hc following. -
1 '- New Catc~pill~ Olympian model DSOP2 Dzca~l Pow~r~i Psclml{cd Elostric Oenerator Set
~ated at 50 kW staudby, 120/450 YAC, 3 Phase, BO He~ with all the standard cquilnuen!
plus the followi~:
Wca~e~proof Enclomme
Electronic Oovernor
Fl~xi~l~ Fu~l Lines
M~in Line Circuit Break~, 3 Pole
Batte~ Char~in~ Alm~netor, 35 Amp, 12 Volt
~.otne and Generator Control Conanlc, "2001"
Initial Pill of Oil and Coolant
· 1 - New Autonmtic T~ansfcr Switch rated st 200 Amps, 600VAC, 3 Pole, ~ phase, with 208 Volt
sens~qb Logic Control, Bxorcise T~me~, and mounted in a NNMA l enclosure
· 1 ~ New 200 Anlp ]~mcrgcncy panel for thc con~0utef ~oon~ ~ computc~ A/C units,
· 1-Set of Operation and M~dntenance Manuals
Mounted on s Dual ~xle flathed trail~ wi~ thc following features: 250 gallon fuel cell, Hydraulic Suq~e
Brakes, Pintlc type Hi~:h, IC LiginL'~, safety chains, f~ont ~onsuc jack, 2 rosr stabili~or ~ack~, and
Pi{{ Tail Cord (25') wi~ ms~.~,~,,~ ~p~cle on th~ buildiu8
* S~artu SmviccandTcsdn~ (4hours)
· Field P ............ ~-- :--~,"~liou of this cnuinment by a licensed contractor who
Also included in oor l~V~,~l price v, qu u~ u~ ~m~,,. -~ ~
will imUdl ~cccpmclc, am well ss mourn ibc automate uansfea switch. Price will include all Uenchin§,
conduit, cable, oouncetions, sad pcrmds requt~ed fo~ a complete and operable
Toud Buret Cost $ 38,q00.90
· Note; These ~c budl{et pHc. cs for prcllminary des~m to achicvc your I{oeh for each of youx cmc~$cncy
, powc~ scenarios, O~e you have · betI~ idea of the sccnarin that is ~O~S tO sc~vc your needs we ca~l get
CMERPILLAR'
P.5
MAY 04 '01 1~8:~?PM JOHNSOM POWER SYSTEMS 9097885112
· h Power stem
togetJtcr and ~scusa thc beat options Fcgar,41~.~ gene~tor ~ and placement.
~ ol~m~,~ your ~c cons~ncnn~ cn,.c~-~ uac~ up~t~u~ ~ . ~ ~ ~w
~de or E ~c Icad ~ on ~ ~ o~ ~ exte~ T~ Icad ~e9 f~ ~s s~ ~ 10 ~
14 we~. T~ ~wi~ ~ ~d m ~ i~ ~Y ~ you do ~cM~ ~ ~U · ~t
1 - ~ Auto.dc Tr~ Swi~ n~ at 2,0~ ~s, ~0VAC, 3 Pole, 3 ~e, ~ 208 Volt
Tol B~g6 Cost S 22,S00.~
~ ~cl~ ~ o~ BUDOET pg~ ~ b~ ~ ~ of ~ cq~l by a licc~d c~r who
~1 po~ a ~e~ pad ~ ~t ~ au~ u~f~ swi~ on. ~ wffi ~c~e ~1 ~bin~
Scenario 2: ATS for l~'~aintcnnn~ Buildin~ Main
1 - N~ Automac ~f~ S~tch n~ at 800 ~s, 600VAC, 3 Polo, 3 Fba~, ~ 208 Volt
s~, Logic ~n~l, Ex~ T~, a~ mo~
To~ ~gel Cost S 10,200.00
Aho ~ ~ o~ B~G~T p~ ~ bc ~ ~ of ~ eqmp~t by a ~ ~n~ w~
1 -Ncw Au~c ~ S~ nt~ at 2~ ~s, 600VAC~ 3 PO~, 3 ~e, wi& 208 ~olt
To~ ~ot Cost ~ %S00~
~o ~luded ~ o~ B~GET p~c w~ ~ ~ ~gon of ~ ~ip~t ~ a ~d ~ who
~cc~, ~ad ~ts roqu~d f~ a o~l~ ~ op~b~ sya~
ScP. nsrlo 4: ATS fO[ City ]tall Con~2Gtcr 1~oom (Trailer)
CATERPILLAR*
P.6
.MAY ~' ~01 ~8:~SPM $OHNSOH PO~ SYSTEt~S 9~FB788511~
3ohnson Power,~vstems
If you have any questions rcgarding this quote, please feel flee to call.
· Submit:ed By,
II ~a~- /
P TERPILLAR'
CITY OF TEMECULA
PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION AGREEMENT
EMERGENCY GENERATOR FOR CITY HALL
This Pumhase and Installation Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered
into as of June 12, 2001 by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation,
and Johnson Power Systems ("Vendor"). In consideration of-the mutual covenants and
promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. Purchase and Sale of Equipment. On and subject to the terms and
conditions set forth in this Agreement and the Contract Documents, Vendor agrees to design,
manufacture, sell, deliver and install to the City one emergency generator for City Hall as more
particularly described in Exhibit A, Description of Equipment, attached hereto and incorporated
herein as though set forth in full (hereafter "Equipment").
2. Purchase/Installation Price. The Purchase and Installation price which
City agrees to pay to Vendor for the design, manufacture and installation of equipment, is One
Hundred Six Thousand, Two Hundred Dollars and No Cents ($106,200.00) The Purchase
price is final and shall be paid by City to Vendor in accordance with the following schedule: Net
30 day upon receipt of invoice from the Vendor and acceptance by the City.
3. Change Orders. All change orders shall be approved by the City
Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by
written order, changes or additions to the Work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as
established by the City Council.
4. Scope of Work. Vendor shall design, manufacture, and install the
equipment as described in the Scope of Work, attached hereto and incorporated herein as
Exhibit A ('~Nork"). Vendor shall provide and furnish all design sketches, labor, materials,
necessary tools, expendable equipment and all utility and transportation services required for
the Work. All of said Work to be performed and materials to be furnished for the Work shall be in
strict accordance with the specifications set forth in the Scope of Work. The Work shall be
completed within the time set forth in the Scope of Work. Contractor shall not commence the
Work until such time as directed by the City.
5. Representations and Warranties of Vendor. Vendor makes the
following representations and warranties to City:
a. Authority and Consents. Vendor has the right, power, legal
capacity and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this
Agreement. No approvals or consents of any persons are necessary in
connection with Vendor's execution, delivery, installation and performance of this
Agreement, except for such as have been obtained on or prior to the date hereof.
The execution, delivery, installation and performance of this Agreement by
Vendor have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of Vendor
and constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of Vendor, enforceable
against Vendor in accordance with their respective terms.
b. Title and Operatinf:l Condition. Vendor has good and marketable
title to all of the Equipment designed, manufactured and installed. All of the
Equipment are free and clear of any restrictions on or conditions to transfer or
R:\vollmum\agreements.all\emergency generator.2001 I
assignment, and City will acquire absolute title to all of the Equipment free and
clear of mortgages, liens, pledges, charges, encumbrances, equities, claims,
covenants, conditions and restrictions except for such as may be created or
granted by City. All of the Equipment are in good operating condition, are free of
any defects, and are in conformity with the specifications, descriptions,
representations and warranties set forth in the Contract Documents. Vendor is
aware the City is purchasing the Equipment for use as an emergency back-up
generator for electrical power to City Hall and that City is relying on Vendor's
warranties that the Equipment is fit for this purpose and the ordinary purposes for
which the Equipment is normally used.
c. Full Disclosure. None of the representations and warranties made
by Vendor in this Agreement contain, or will contain any untrue statement of a
material fact, or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
6. Performance. Vendor shall at all times faithfully, competently and
to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent perform all tasks described herein. Vendor
shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons
engaged in providing similar services as are required of Vendor hereunder in meeting its
obligations under this Agreement. Installation of the Equipment shall be performed by a licensed
contractor.
7. City Approval. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services
shall be furnished and work performed and completed subject to the approval of the City or its
authorized representatives, and the quality of the workmanship shall be guaranteed for one year
from date of acceptance. The City shall inspect the Equipment at the time and place of delivery.
Such inspection may include reasonable tests and use of the Equipment by City. If, in the
determination of City, the Equipment fails to conform to the Agreement IN ANY MANNER OR
RESPECT, City shall so notify Vendor within ten (10) days of delivery of the Equipment to City.
Failing such notice, the Equipment shall be deemed accepted by City as of the date of receipt.
8. Time of Delivery. The date and time of delivery of the Equipment
shalt be approximately fourteen (14) weeks upon contract approval (September 18, 2001 ).
9. Place of Delivery. The Equipment shall be delivered to this location:
43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. On-site installation date and time must be
pre-approved by City.
10. Rejection. In the event of such notice of non-conformity by City
pursuant to Section 6, City may, at its option, (1)reject the whole of the Equipment and
Installation, (2)accept the whole of the Equipment and Installation, or (3)accept any
commercial unit or units of the Equipment and reject the remainder or the Installation. The
exercise of any of the above options shall be "without prejudice" and with full reservation of any
rights and remedies of City attendant upon a breach. In the event of such notice and election by
the City, City agrees to comply with all reasonable instructions of Vendor and, in the event that
expenses are incurred by City in following such instructions, Vendor shall indemnify City in full
for such expenses.
11. No Replacements of Cure. This Agreement calls for strict compliance.
Vendor expressly agrees that the design, manufacture and installation of Equipment tendered
and the tender itself will conform fully to the terms and conditions of the Agreement on the
R:\vollmum\agreements.all\emergency generator, 2001 2
original tender. In the event of rejection by City of the whole of the Equipment or any part
thereof pursuant to Section 8, City may, but is not required to, accept any substitute
performance from Vendor or engage in subsequent efforts to effect a cure of the original tender
by Vendor.
12. Indemnification. Vendor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold
harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers from and against any
and all claims, demands, losses, damages, costs and liability of any kind or nature which the
City, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be
imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of or
from the Equipment or Vendor's maintenance thereof, excepting only liability arising out of the
sole negligence of the City.
13. Contract Documents.
a. This Agreement includes the following documents, which are by
this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof: (1) Vendor quote,
scenario #2, dated May 4, 2001, attached hereto as Exhibit A.
b. In the event any term or condition of the Contract Documents
conflicts with or is contradictory to any term or condition of the Agreement, the
terms and conditions of this Agreement are controlling.
c. In the event of a conflict in terms between this Agreement, the
quote provided by the Vendor and attached to this Agreement shall prevail.
14. Default of Vendor.
a. The Vendor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event the Vendor is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Vendor for any
work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by
written notice to the Vendor. If such failure by the Vendor to make progress in the performance
of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Vendor's control, and without fault or
negligence of the Vendor, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines the Vendor is in default in
the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall service the Vendor
with written notice of the default. The Vendor shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of
said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event the
Vendor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right,
notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without
further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in
equity or under this Agreement.
15. Liability Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the
duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
R:\voilm um\agreements.all\emergency generator.2001 ~
(1)
(2)
(3)
Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form CG 0001).
Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87)
covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance.
(4) Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the
consultant's profession.
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less
than:
(1)
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General
Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is
used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to
this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice
the required occurrence limit.
(2)
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(3)
Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or
disease.
(4) Errors and omissions liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City
Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions
as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall
procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration
and defense expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1)
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and
completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned,
occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned,
leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall
contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded
to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or
R:\vollmum\agreernents.all\emergency generator.2001 4
self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's
insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(3)
(4)
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the
policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage
provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect
to the limits of the insurer's liability.
(5)
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by
either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30)
days' prior written notice by cedified mail, return receipt requested,
has been given to the City.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
f. Verification of Coveraqe. Consultant shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed
by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to
be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the
City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer
may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including
endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications.
16. Prevailinq Wages. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the
Labor Code of the State of California, the District Council has obtained the general prevailing
rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for
each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contractor from the
Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk.
Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. Contractor shall post a
copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a
minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5,
1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code,
Contractor shall forfeit to the District, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or
portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated
prevailing rates for any work done under this contract, by him or by any subcontractor under
him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract.
17. Survival of Representations and Warranties. All representations,
warranties, covenants and agreements of the parties contained in this Agreement shall survive
the execution, delivery, installation and performance of this Agreement.
18. Leqal Responsibilities. The Vendor shall keep itself informed of
State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in
any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Vendor shall at
all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and
R:\voilmum\a§reements.all\emergency generator.2001 5
employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Vendor to comply
with this section.
19. Prohibited Interest. No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula
shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the
Contractor, or Contractor's sub-contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year
thereafter. The Contractor hereby/ warrrants and-represents to the City that no officer or
employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual,
financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's
sub-contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such
interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement.
20. Independent Contractor. Vendor is and shall at all times remain as to
the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this
Agreement on behalf of the Vendor shall at all times be under the Vendor's exclusive direction
and control. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees, agents or volunteers shall have
control over the conduct of the Vendor or any of the Vendor's officers, employees, agents or
volunteers except as set forth in this Agreement. Vendor shall not at .any time or in any manner
represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner, officers,
employees or agents of the City of Temecula. Vendor shall not incur or have the power to incur
any debt, obligation or liability whatever against the City, or bind the City in any manner.
21. Assiqnment. The Vendor shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of
the City.
22. Notices. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the
other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal
service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to,
Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the
United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the
address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate
by Notice:
To Vendor at: Johnson Powery Systems
Attn: Paul Crafts
656 East Lacadens Drive
P O Box 351
Riverside, CA 92505-0351
To City at: City of Temecula
Aftn: City Manager
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92589
23. Governinq Law. The City and Vendor understand and agree that the
laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the
parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation
concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior or federal district court
with jurisdiction over the City of Temecula.
24. Entire Aqreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All
prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or
written, are merged into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein
R:\vollmum~agreements.all~emergency generator.2001 (~
and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems
material.
25. Authority To Execute This A.qreement. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Vendor warrants and represents that he or she has the
authority to 'execute this Agreement on b~half of the Vendor and' has'the authority to bind
Vendor to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have duly executed in on
the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
R:\vollm um~agreem ents.all\emergency generator.2001 '7
Vendor
Johnson Power Systems
656 East Lacadens Drive
P O Box 351
Riverside, CA 92502-0351
Phone (909) 683-5960
Fax (909) 788-5112
BY:
Signatures two (2) Corporate Officers required for corporations.
R:~vollm um~agreement s,all\emergency generator. 2001 8
EXHIBIT A
DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT/SCOPE OF WORK
All work to be performed as per specifications attached hereto and incorporated herein.
Scenario 2: Generator for City Hall only. Generator.to be mounted in the center of
the north side of the main parking lot. Budget cost includes the following.
1- New Caterpiller model 3306 Diesel Powered Packaged Electric Generator Set
rated at 250 kW standby, 120/208 VAC, 3 phase, 60 Hertz, with all the standard
equipment plus the following:
Weatherproof Enclosure
Electronic Governor
Base Fuel Tank, 1000 gallons, 53 hours
Flexible Fuel Lines
Main Line Circuit Breaker, 3 Pole, 1000 Amp
Starting Battery, 12 Volt
Battery Charging Alternator, 35 Amp, 12 Volt
Engine and Generator Control Console, EMCPII
Exhaust Silencer, Flexible Connector, and Rain Cap
Initial Fill of Oil and Coolant
New Automatic Transfer Switch rated at 2,000 Amps, 600 VAC, 3 Pole, 3 Phase,
with 208 Voit sensing, Logic Control, Exercise Timer, and mounted in a NEMA
3R enclosure
1- Set of Operation and Maintenance Manuals
FOB Temecula
*Field Start up Service and Testing (4 hours)
Also included in our BUDGET price will be the installation o£this equipment by
a licensed contractor who will poor a concrete pad to mount the generator on, as
well as a pad to mount the automatic transfer switch on. Price will include all
trenching, conduit, cable, connections, and permits required for a complete and
operable system.
Total Budget Cost $106,200.00
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE
Cost of Work shall not exceed $106,200.00 as quoted by the Vendor in the letter dated May 4,
2001 attached hereto and incorporated herein.
R:\vollmum~agreements.all\emergency generator. 2001 '1 0
ITEM 7
CITY ATTORNEY /~, ~-.~ . 1
D,RECTOR OF F,.^.6E /
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Manager/City Council
James O'Grady, Assistant City Manager
June 12, 2001
SUBJECT:
Consideration of the Temecula Fall Rod Run, "Hot Rods & Hadeys
Cruising for the Boy Scouts" Sponsorship Request
Prepared by: Gloda Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator
RECOMMENDATION:
1)
That the City Council approve the sponsorship request for the Temecula Fall Rod
Run, "Hot Rods & Hadeys Cruising for the Boy Scouts" event.
BACKGROUND: Staff has received a request from The Boy Scouts of Amedca to
provide city support costs for the proposed Temecula Fall Rod Run, "Hot Rods &
Hadeys Cruising for the Boy Scouts" event. This event will be held September 28 - 29,
2001 in Old Town Temecula. It will include invitations to car buffs, special events and
activities. The event promoters will stage numerous venues in Old Town to enhance the
event including an evening car and motorcycle cruise and a Sock Hop (Third & Front
Streets) on Fdday evening, and a pancake breakfast and Show & Shine on Saturday.
The Fall Rod Run would be shortened from last year's two-day event. The 2001 Fall
Rod Run will begin Friday evening and will end at 4:30 p.m. on Saturday. The number
of vehicles would be limited to no more than 400 cars and 150 motorcycles. There will
be no Beer & Wine Garden or alcohol sold at this event.
Furthermore, this event will serve as a fundraiser for The Boy Scouts of America in
Temecula, a non-profit organization, with 75% of the net proceeds directed towards
Temecula Troops number 624, 924, 343, 934, 334, 911, 148, 301, 337 and 384. All
event proceeds will stay in the community to support Temecula Scouting programs.
The Fall Rod Run, "Hot Rods & Hadeys Cruising for the Boy Scouts" will be sponsored
by P & R Productions for benefit of The Boy Scouts of Amedca in Temecula in
cooperation with The Ddffers Car Club. Due to the structure of the Boy Scouts of
Amedca, the local Boy Scout Troops are not able to sign a contract themselves. It must
go before their District Council, which could take up to 2 months for approval Thus,
upon legal advice from the Boy Scouts of Amedca, P & R Productions, a California
R:\W olnickg\Agendarepor tsWall Rod Run 2001.doc
General Partnership, was formed to manage, run and promote the event with the Boy
Scouts of Amedca. The Boy Scouts of Amedca is fully supportive of this arrangement.
Additional information can be found in the sponsorship package, which is included as
Attachment "A" of this report. A detailed summary of the event is included as
Attachment "B".
In addition to the fundraising for the local Boy Scouts, the event has the potential to
provide toudsm and economic benefits to the City of Temecula.
Marketing and publicity will include posters, flyers, car/rod and entertainment magazines
and newsletters, major newspapers, websites, and radio throughout Southem Califomia.
Flyers will be mailed and distributed at car shows. Local marketing will include The
Press-Enterprise, radio, and community newspapers. In addition, a media day will be
held on September 8th or 15Ih to promote the event.
In an effort to better understand this event, and to determine potential costs, staff has
met with the event sponsor. Staff estimates that should Council choose to approve this
sponsorship, City support costs such as police, fire, and public works would be
approximately $23,500. There will be no commissions, consultant fees and/or salades
paid to any party from the City of Temecula's sponsorship.
On May 16th, 2001, the Economic Development Sub-committee, Mayor Jeff Comerchere
and Mayor Pro Tern Ron Roberts, and staff met with representatives of The Drifters Car
Club and Boy Scouts of America to discuss their funding of the Fall Rod Run. At that
time the groups provided additional information on the Fall Rod Run to the Sub-
committee members. The Economic Development Sub-committee funding
recommendation is to provide funding for actual city-support service costs up to $23,500.
If the Fall Rod Run requires any significant and unanticipated city-support expenses
including police, fire and/or public works above the budgeted amount, further billing of P
& R Productions would be required.
FISCAL IMPACT: It is estimated that City support costs for this event would be
approximately $23,500. Adequate funds have been included in the proposed FY 2001-
02 Operating Budget of the various support departments for the recommended
sponsorship amount.
ATTACHMENTS:
Fall Rod Run, "Hot Rods & Hade,/s Cruisinq for the Boy Scouts"
Attachment A - Sponsorship Package
Attachment B - Event & Media Promotions
Attachment C - Budget
Attachment D - Estimated City Support Costs
Attachment E - Sponsorship Agreement
R:\Wolnickg\Agendarepor ts~Fall Rod Run 2001.doc
TEMECULA FALL ROD RUN,
HOT RODS & HARLEYS CRUISING FOR THE BOY SCOUTS
ATTACHMENT A - SPONSORSHIP PACKAGE
R:\W olnickgkAgendar epor t s~Fal I Rod Run 2001.doc
TEMECULA FALL ROD RUN,
"HOT RODS & HARLEYS CRUISING FOR THE BOY SCOUTS"
SPONSORSHIP PACKAGE
The City of Temecula's benefits as a Presenting Sponsor of the Temecula Fall Rod Run,
"Hot Rods & Harleys Cruising For The Boy Scouts":
· City logo/or name will appear on all flyers, advertisements, poster, program and
promotional items relating to the event
· Free booth space at event
· City name on all press releases
· City of Temecula advertisement in the official program
· 10 event t-shirts
· 10 event posters
R:\W olniokg\Ag~ndar~:por tsWall Rod Run 2001.do~
TEMECULA FALL ROD RUN,
HOT RODS & HARLEYS CRUISING FOR THE BOY SCOUTS
ATTACHMENT B - EVENT & MEDIA PROMOTIONS
R:\W olnickg~AgendarepoflskFal! Rod Run 200 l.doc
Temecula's
Fall Rod Run
Hot Rods & Harleys Cruising for the Boy Scouts
September 28th & 29 2001
First we would like The City of Temecula to be the Premier Sponsor of this event, benefiting
the Boy Scouts of Temecula. We would like to change the format of last years Fall Rod Run
to be even more merchant and general public friendly.
a. Event will be condensed from last year's two-day one evening event, to a Friday night
cruise and a Saturday show & shine. This would decrease the amount of funding by
one full day and at the same time give the downtown merchants the opportunity to do
business without the streets being blocked two days in a row. We will Limit the
number of cars to no more than 400 and Bikes to 150. This event will again be an
3.
4.
5.
alcohol free event.
i. Needs on Friday Night: We would like to have the streets blocked offfrom
5pm to 9pm to allow open cruising from Arch to Arch for Hot Rods. Last year
the Friday night was a big success, and the crowds that came down town to
watch the cruising were tremendous. This is big benefit to the downtown
merchants and restaurants that remains open.
ii. Vendors Friday evening: Would be allowed to set up starting at 5pm to let
them join in the evening festivities. We would again have a Sock Hop at
Third & Front Street.
iii. Needs on Saturday: Streets blocked from 7am to 4:30 pm. We will use all of
Front Street, and the business parking lots on the facing Front Street and the
Stampede parking lot. All side streets on the east side will remain open for
public parking, with the streets barricades being placed with only two cars
facing east, and up to 6 cars facing west on Main Street.
iv. We would like to do a pancake breakfast Saturday morning at the staging area
leading into old town. We would ask the Boy Scouts if they would put on this
event.
v. Vendors will be on the comers of each street same as last year, and we would
again like to use the Stampede pool lot for vendors.
vi. We want the public to be able to drive downtown and be able to park on all
streets except Front Street. We will not charge for parking we want to
encourage the public to come on down and enjoy.
vii. Needs Public Restrooms: We would like to see the city pick up the cost of
Porta Poties due to the fact we will be limiting the number of food vendors.
and it benefits Old Town with all the visitors this event will bring in. This
change would save the Boy Scouts at least $2500 Dollars.
viii. Event ends at 4:30pm on Saturday
The Boy Scouts will not need any city monetary funding; we will work on dollars generated
by sponsorships and vehicle registrations.
We don't anticipate any other changes to this proposal.
Budget: See attachment A
Overall event costs for special event organizers. Drifters Car Club will be given $400.00 for
the help in parking, Car Judging and over all supervision of vendors. Kola if used, there will
be a cost of $2000 for their services. Pat Vesey & Ray Waite will be given 25% of the dollars
generated for their services in promoting this event and handling the day to day operations
and paper work.
a. All funds collected for registration and sponsorship dollars go directly to the Boy
Scouts
b. The Boy Scouts will control all funds.
Financial Prr~t ~r I~ ~t~tF~m~nt Ft~r last x~r iq nc~t ~x;nrllkl~
From: Pat Vese¥ 909.506-0933 To: Gloria Wolnick Date: 5/23/200] Time: ]:42:46 PM Page ! of ]
City of Temecula
Gloria Wolnick
Marketing Coordinator
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Dear Gloria,
Our Plan for the media would be as follows; we will submit a marketing proposal to the Press- Enterprise
for sponsor ship as we did last year. We hope to increase our media with an increase from last years $3000
to $5000 this year, now that we have a proven event. We will also feature The City of Temecula on at least
10,000 flyers to be distributed in the mail and at ear shows.
We would again like to work with the Press Enterprise in printing poste~and a program book featuring the
City of Temecula, We also will plan a media day to be held the 8~ or 15 of September. These are the key
media areas we hope to accomplish. We will also fie in to as many web sights and car cruise magazines as
possible, along with many press releases.
I hope this answers your questions on media if not please give me a call.
Sincerely
Pat Vesey
Drifters Car Club
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
CALIFORNIA INLAND EMPIRE COUNCIL
1230 Indiana Court · Recllands, California 92374-2896
(909) 793-2463 or 825-8844 · FAX: 793-0306
4~24~0
City of Temecula
Attention; James O'Gradey, Assistant City Manager
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
O~FLCt~ -
Dear Mr. O'Gradey:
The Boys Scouts of America, Tahquitz District would like to participate in the Fall Rod Run to
benefit local Scouts and Scouting Programs. The funds generated from this event would assist
our local Scouts primarily with camperships to attend summer camp. In addition, other unit
related expenditures such as; advancement materials, troop camping equipment and recruitment
materials will be funded. The units participating and benefiting from the Fall Rod Run will be
exclusively from Temecula. All proceeds will stay in our community to support Temecula
Scouting programs.
The event will be put on by the Drifter's and the Temecula Boy Scouts. All promotion will done
by Pat Vesey and Ray Waite with Scouts assisting as needed. To ensure proper fiscal
management a steering committee of local Scout leaders will be formed to oversee the activity.
A special account will be set-up to manage the event with all deposits and expenditures being
processed through the account. Upon completion of the event all proceeds will be split 75% to
the Scouts and 25% to Pat Vesey and Ray Waite.
Thank you for your time, consideration and on-going support of Scouting in our community! IfI
can answer any questions please don't hesitate 'to call. I can be reached locally at (900)695-
7450.
Sincerely,
Sean Roy
Tahquitz District Scout Executive
A progrant for Cub Scouts. Boy Scouts. Co-ed Ventures, and Co-ed Explorers
Supported by Friends of ScoutH~g. Endowment Funds. and United Way
Temecula Fall Rod Run Cruising for the Boy Scouts of Temecula
Drifters Car Club & P & R Productions
28192 Tierra Vista Rd.
Temecula, CA 92592
Phone 909-699-1876
May 31, 2001
City of Temecula
James B. O'Grady
Assistant City Manager
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Dear Jim,
The Boy Scouts would like to be the beneficiary of the Fall Rod Run as a fundraiser to benefit the youth
of Temecula.
P & R Productions would produce this event with the assistance of The Drifters Car Club; we believe we
can put on an excellent event showcasing the Boy. Scouts and City of Temecula.
To answer your questions the money raised by this event will go only to the Boy Scouts of Temecula.
Troop number 624,924,343,943,334,911,148,301,337, and 384.
A neutral third party acceptable to the Boy Scouts of Temeeula will set up accounting for this event and
make arrangements for all money collected to be deposited directly an account open to review by the
city of Temecula & the Boy Scouts.
Jim, it takes minimum of throe months to promote a good show four months would be better, with out
this amount of time I know we will not have as successful show as we did last year in Old Town
Temecula due to the time constraints. Please let me know if there is any way to start promoting this
before July.
After reviewing the attached changes please feel free to call Ray Waite, Bill Kipp or myself, we will
happy to go over the changes in detail.
Sincerely
Pat Vesey
Drit~ers Car Club
Bio for Ray Waite & Pat Vescy
Pat Vesey & Ray Waite formed P & R Productions in order to put on Car Shows and
events in and around the Temecula Valley. We have produced or volunteered for such
events as the Temecula Rod Run, the Temecula Fall Rod Run, Wings & Wheels at
French Valley Airport, Cruising For the Veterans in Temecula and many more.
Ray Waite is Gunnery Sergeant in the USMC for the past 18 years at Camp Pendleton
and works at the Marine Corps Air Station. Ray is a long time car enthusiast and is a
resident of Temecula and has supported and worked for many car Events in our area and
at Camp Pendleton. Ray is a member of the Drifters Car Club and The Veterans of
Foreign wars who has benefited from numerous car shows that Ray has worked.
Pat Vesey has been in Sales & Marketing for over 35 years spending 10 Years with
Kellogg's Cereal Company, 10 years with Kodak and 10 years with Fuji and VP of
National Accounts. Pat has also been involved with Car Shows and events in and around
the Temecula Valley. We have produced or volunteered for such events as the Temecula
Rod Run, the Temecula Fail Rod Run, Wings & Wheels at French Valley Airport, and
Cruising For the Veterans in Temecula. Pat is also a member of the Drifters Car Club and
has also worked to help raise money for the VFW.
TEMECULA FALL ROD RUN,
HOT RODS & HARLEYS CRUISING FOR THE BOY SCOUTS
ATTACHMENT C-BUDGET
R:\Woh~i~g~.gc~da~por ts~Fall Rod Run 2001.doc
Temecula Fall Rod Run Cruising for the Boy Scouts
Budget for the Fall Rod Run 2001
16-Mar-01
Revenue
Car Registrations 400 at $25.00 $10,000.00
Bike Registrations 150 at $25.00 $ 3,750.00
Sponsom $ 8,000.00
Vendors $ 3,000.00
T-shirt Sales $ 400.00
Raffle $ 800.00
50/50 $ 250.00
souvenirs $ 200.00
Total $ 26,400.00
Expenses
Awards $ 500.00
Signs $ 1,000.00
Postage $ 500.00
Posters $ 1,000.00
Rentals $ 500.00
Music/Entertainment $ 800.00
Clean Up $ 750.00
Insurance $ 350.00
Communications Equipment $ 400,00
T-shirts $ 4,200.00
Advertising $ 500.00
*Frae Way Signs $ 500.00
**Porta Potties $ 2,300.00
Ddflem Car Club Parking etc. $ 400.00
Supplies $ 175.00
Miscellanies costs $ 250.00
Permits Fee's $ 360.00
Total $14,485.00
Revenue
Expenses
Promotion Cost 25%
Net/Net to Boy Scouts
$ 26,400.00
$ 14,485.00
$ 11,915.00
$ 2,978.75
$ 8,936.25
TEMECULA FALL ROD RUN,
HOT RODS & HARLEYS CRUISING FOR THE BOY SCOUTS
ATTACHMENT D - ESTIMATED CITY SUPPORT COSTS
R:\Wolnickg~Agondaxepor ts~Fal I Rod Run 2001.doc
TEMECULA FALL ROD RUN,
"HOT RODS & HARLEYS CRUISING FOR THE BOY SCOUTS"
ESTIMATED CITY SUPPORT COSTS
Based on the input from City departments we received cost projections for the Fall 2001
Rod Run, the following expenses can be anticipated for this event:
Police: $17,493
Fire: 2,446,63
Public Works: 2,000
Community Services: 730
Planning (Code Enforcement): 750
TOTAL: ~;23~419.63
R:\W olnickg'~Agendarepotts~Fall Rod Run 2001.do~
TEMECULA FALL ROD RUN,
HOT RODS & HARLEYS CRUISING FOR THE BOY SCOUTS
ATTACHMENT E- SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT
R:\Wolnickg~gendar epor ts~Fall Rod Run 2001 .doc
SPONSORSI~P AGREEMENT BETWEEN
CITY OF TEMECULA AND
P & R PRODUCTIONS
This Agreement, made this 12th day of June, 2001, by and between the CITY OF
TEMECULA, (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and P & R Productions, a California
General Partnership.
A. P & R Productions will operate the Temecula Fall Rod Run, "Hot Rods &
Harleys Cruising for the Boy Scouts" on September 28 & 29, 2001. The Temecula Fall
Rod Run, "Hot Rods & Harleys Cruising for the Boy Scouts" is a special event located in
Old Town Temecula involving the display of no more than 400 classic cars and 150
motorcycles. No alcohol will be served. The event will also feature a Sock Hop, which
will be held Friday evening, and a Pancake Breakfast, held on Saturday morning, in Old
Town. This event is expected to draw between 15,000 - 20,000 people for the event.
B. The City of Temecula desires to be a "Premier Sponsor" of the 2001
Temecula Fall Rod Run, "Hot Rods & Harleys Cruising for the Boy Scouts."
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows:
A. In exchange for providing for the Temecula Fall Rod Run, "Hot Rods &
Harleys Cruising for the Boy Scouts," all city-suppott costs including Public Works, Fire
and Police, the City of Temecula shall be designated as a "Premier Sponsor" of the 2001
Temecula Fall Rod Run. The estimated city-support costs are not to exceed $23,500. In
the event that City support services exceeds $23,500, the sponsor may seek City
authorization for payment above that amount. In exchange for being a Premier Sponsor,
the City of Temecula will receive the benefits as listed in Attachment A.
B. The Temecula Fall Rod Run, "Hot Rods & Harleys Cruising for the Boy
--Scouts" will serve as a fundraiser for The Boy Scouts of America of Temecula, with
seventy-five (75%) of the net proceeds to be paid prorata to the Boy Scouts of Temecula,
Troops number 624, 924, 343, 934, 334, 911, 148, 301, 337, and 384, and twenty-five
(25%) of the net proceeds to be paid to P & R Productions as the event organizers.
C. Within 60 days following the Temecula Fall Rod Run, "Hot Rods &
Harleys Cruising for the Boy Scouts," P & R Productions shall prepare and submit to the
Assistant City Manager a written report evaluating the Temecula Fall Rod Run, its
attendance, and describing the materials in which the City was listed as a Premier
Sponsor. The report should also include samples of media press clippings, flyers,
pamphlets, etc. in a presentation notebook format. In addition, a complete financial
statement of the revenue and expenses of the Fall Rod Run must be provided along with a
separate statement indicating the distribution of the funds, i.e. local scout troops that
received proceeds. P & R Productions will administer all money transactions for the
event. A neutral third party acceptable to the Boy Scouts of Temecula shall prepare an
accounting for the Temecula Fall Rod Run, "Hot Rods & Harleys Cruising for the Boy
Scouts" event.
D. P & R Productions shall file Temporary Use Permit and Special Event
Permit applications with the City of Temecula no later than 90 days preceding the first
day of the Temecula Fall Rod Run, "Hot Rods & Harleys Cruising for the Boy Scouts"
event.
E. Once the Temporary Use Permit and Special Event Permit applications
have been submitted and the event agreement has been executed in final form, P & R
Productions will receive authorization to receive City Support Services for the Temecula
Fall Rod Run, "Hot Rods & Harleys Cruising for the Boy Scouts" as outlined in the
agreement.
F. P & R Productions agrees that it will defend, indemnify and hold the City
and its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees free and harmless from all claims
for damage to persons or by reason of The Boy Scouts of America acts or omissions or
those of The Boy Scouts of America's employees, officers, agents, or invites in
connection with the Temecula Fall Rod Run, "Hot Rods & Harleys Cruising for the Boy
Scouts" to the maximum extent allowed by law.
G. P & R Productions shall secure from a State of California admitted
insurance company, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this
Agreement a policy of comprehensive general liability in which the City of Temecula and
the Temecula Redevelopment Agency is named insured or is named as an additional
insured with P & R Productions and shall furnish a Certificate of Liability by the City
(refer to Attachment F). Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy or any
subsequent endorsement attached hereto, the protection offered by the policy shall;
Include the City as the insured or named as an additional insured
covering all claims arising out of, or in connection with, the
Temecula Fail Rod Run, "Hot Rods & Harleys Cruising for the
Boy Scouts."
Include the City, its officers, employees and agents while acting
within the scope of their duties under this Agreement against all
claims arising out of, or in connection with Temecula Fall Rod
Run, "Hot Rods & Harleys Cruising for the Boy Scouts."
Provide the following minimum limits:
General Liability: $4,000,000 per occurrence for bodily
injury, personal injury and property damage with a
$4,000,000 aggregate.
The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against
the City, its officer, officials, employees and volunteers for losses
arising from the Temecula Fall Rod Run, "Hot Rods & Harleys
Cruising for the Boy Scouts."
Bear an endorsement or shall have attached a rider whereby it is
provided that, in the event of expiration or proposed cancellation
of such policy for any reason whatsoever, the City shall be notified
by registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, not
less than thirty (30) days beforehand.
Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and
approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer
shall reduce or eliminate such deductible or self-insured retefition
as respects the City, its officers, officials and employees or The
Boy Scouts of America shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment
of losses and related investigations, claim administration and
defense expenses.
H. Should any litigation be commenced between the parties, hereto
concerning the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party concerning the
provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled
to reasonable attorney's fees, in addition to any other relief to which it may be
entitled.
I. The Temecula Fall Rod Run event must be held within the City of
Temecula limits.
J. P & R Productions will need to adhere to the Conditions of Approval for
the event, which will be presented to P & R Productions upon City Council's approval
of this event. Any violation of this document is subject to termination of the
sponsorship agreement between the City and P & R Productions.
1N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
DATED:
P & R PRODUCTIONS
28192 Tierra Vista
Temecula, CA 92592
CITY OF TEMECULA
BY:
Pat Vesey
General Partner
Jeff Comerchero
Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorson
City Attorney
TEMECULA FALL ROD RUN,
HOT RODS & HARLEYS CRUISING FOR THE BOY SCOUTS
ATTACHMENT F -CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
R:\W olnickg~Agendar opor t s~Fal I Rod Run 2001.doc
ITEM 8
APPROV/~ii ~''~
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAI~CE
CITY MANAGER ,/~) I - '
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OFTEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Service~
June 12, 2001
Implementation of Special Tax - Measure C
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
Barbara Smith, Management Analyst
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-__
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING THE AMOUNT OF THE SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR FISCAL YEAR
2001-2002 TO FINANCE RECREATIONAL AND HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAMS
AND THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF PUBLIC PARKS
AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, MEDIAN LANDSCAPING, AND ARTERIAL
STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS
BACKGROUND: Beginning Fiscal Year 1997-98, the Community Services, Parks and
Recreation and Arterial Street Lighting Rates and Charges previously levied by the TCSD were
replaced by the City of Temecula's Parks/Lighting Services special tax approved by the voters as
Measure C on March 4, 1997. The purpose of the Parks/Lighting Services special tax is to provide
for the ongoing operations, maintenance, and servicing of the City's public park and recreation
facilities, recreational and human services programs, median landscaping, arterial street lights and
traffic signals.
The Parks/Street Lighting Services special tax is levied in the same manner, at the same time as the
TCSD Rates and Charges, and collected on the annual property tax bills for Fiscal Year 2001-2002.
The maximum annual tax has been established at $74.44 per single-family residential dwelling unit;
$55.84 per multi-family residential dwelling unit, $148.88 per acre of vacant property in a residential
zone, $297.76 per acre of vacant property in a non-residential zone, $446.64 per acre of non-
residential improved property, $148.88 per acre of golf course property, and $37.22 per acre for
agricultural uses.
For Fiscal Year 2001-2002, the total operating budget for parks, recreation, medians, and arterial
street lighting services is $6,026,930. The total possible revenue received atthe current rate from
r R:\smithb'~Assessments\01-02 Staff Spec Tax Council.doc June 12, 2001
all taxable parcels within the City for Fiscal Year 2000-2001 is $2,626,184. The difference in
operating costs over levy revenue is offset by fund balance transfers, recreational revenues and
user fees, and REST Program contributions.
Pursuant to City Ordinance 96-21, the City Council is also empowered to establish the amount of the
tax levy each fiscal year, approved by the voters, not to exceed the maximum tax rates identified
above. As a result, it is recommended that the amounts to be levied as a special tax for Fiscal Year
2000-2001, be less than the maximum amounts established by City Ordinance No. 96-21, in the
following manner:
$ 63.44 per single family residential dwelling unit
$ 47.58 per multi-family residential dwelling unit
$126.88 per acre of vacant property in a residential zone
$ 253.76 per acre of vacant property in a non-residential zone
$ 380.64 per acre of non-residential improved property
$126.88 per acre of golf course property
$ 31.72 per acre of agricultural property
In keeping with the City Council's continued practice of trying to reduce fees to our property owners
whenever possible, and even though it is allowable for the City Council to approve this year's
Special Tax at the maximum rate, the above recommended Special Tax is a $11.00 per equivalent
dwelling unit (EDU) savings from the maximum rate of $74.44 per EDU. In addition, this is the
seventh consecutive year that the Revenue Excess Sharing in Temecula (REST) program has
contributed to the overall reduction in the rates for parks, recreation, and street lighting services.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Special Tax levy at the proposed rates will generate $2,626,184.
The remaining funds necessary to complete the Parks/Lighting Services budget wilt be derived from
fund balance, recreation revenue, user fees, and general fund contributions.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution to Levy Special Tax.
rR:\smithb~Assessments\01-02 Staff Spec Tax Council.doc June 12, 2001
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING THE AMOUNT OF THE SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR FISCAL YEAR
2001-2002 TO PROVIDE FOR RECREATION AND HUMAN SERVICES
PROGRAMS AND THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF
PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, MEDIAN LANDSCAPING,
AND ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY FINDS,
RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Pursuant to the authority of Article XI, Section 7 of the California
Constitution, Government Code Section 37100.5, and other applicable law, the City Council
adopted, and the voters of the City of Temecula approved, Ordinance No. 96-21, levying and
assessing a special tax on each parcel of property in the City of Temecula for each fiscal year,
commencing with fiscal year 1997-98.
Section 2. The maximum amount of said special tax for each fisoal year as
established by Ordinance No. 96-21 is $74.44 per single-family residential dwelling unit, $55.83
per multi-family residential dwelling unit, $148.88 per acre of vacant property in a residential
zone, $297.76 per acre of vacant property in a non-residential zone, $446.64 per acre of non-
residential improved property, $148.88 per acre of golf course property, and $37.22 per acre for
agricultural uses.
Section 3. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 96-21 the City Council is empowered to
establish the amounts of the special tax levy annually each fiscal year, in amounts not to exceed
the maximum amounts specified in Section 2 of this Resolution, as is required to provide an
adequate level of service in accordance with the purposes set forth in the Ordinance.
Section 4. The City Council hereby determines that the following amounts are
required to provide an adequate level of service in accordance with the purposes set forth in
Ordinance No. 96-21, and hereby establishes the following amounts to be levied as a special tax
for fiscal year 2000-2001, which amounts are less than the maximum amounts established by
Ordinance No. 96-21 and approved by voters:
$ 63.44
$ 47.58
$126.88
$253.76
$380.64
$126.88
$ 31.72
:er single-family residential dwelling unit
)er multi-family residential dwelling unit
~er acre of vacant property in a residential zone
~er acre of vacant property in a non-residential zone
3er acre of non-residential improved property
3er acre of golf course property
0er acre of agricultural property
Section 5. The special tax shall be collected in the same manner, on the same
dates, and shall be subject to the same penalties and interest as other charges and taxes fixed
and collected by the County of Riverside on behalf of the City of Temecula. Said special tax,
together with all penalties and interest thereon, shall constitute a lien upon the parcel upon
which it is levied until it has been paid, and said special tax, together with all penalties and
interest thereon, shall, until paid, constitute a personal obligation to the City of Temecula by the
persons who own the parcel on the date the tax is due. All laws applicable to the levy, collection,
R:~smithb~Assessments\01-02 Reso for Special Tax.doc 06/12/01
and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the matters
of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, are applicable to the special tax,
except for California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831.
Section 6. The revenue raised by the special tax shall be placed in a special
fund to be used only for the purposes of financing recreational and human services programs,
and the operation, maintenance, and servicing of public parks and recreational facilities, median
landscaping, arterial street lights and traffic signals throughout the City of Temecula and
administrative expenses incurred by the City in connection therewith.
Section 7. The special tax shall not be imposed upon a federal or state
governmental agency or another local governmental agency or upon any parcel of property that
is exempt from the special tax imposed by this ordinance pursuant to any provision of the
Constitution or any paramount law.
Section 8. The City Clerk is hereby ordered to transmit or cause to be
transmitted to the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, California before August 9, 2001,
the property tax roll with the special tax enumerated for each parcel not exempt therefrom; and
the County Auditor is hereby designated, required, empowered, authorized, instructed, directed
and ordered to make collection of such special tax as shown on that roll and to perform any and
all duties necessary therefor.
Section 9. If a property owner subject to the special tax challenges or questions
the levy of the special tax against such property owner's property, such property owner must
appeal the levy by filing an appeal with the City Clerk before 5:00 p.m. on December 1,2001,
pursuant to procedures established by the City.
Section 10. If a property owner subject to the special tax believes that payment
of the special tax for fiscal year 2001-2002 would create a hardship for that property owner
during that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing a hardship appeal with
the City Clerk before 5:00 p.m. on December 1,2001, pursuant to procedures established by the
City, in order to be considered under the hardship appeal program.
Section 11. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any
person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction,
such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any other provision or applications, and to
this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. The City Council does
hereby declare that it would have adopted this Resolution and each section, subsection,
sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more
sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, parts or portions hereof are declared invalid or
unconstitutional.
Section 12. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
-2-
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this
12th day of June, 2001.
ATTEST:
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 2001- was duly adopted by
the City Council of the City of Temecula at the regular meeting thereof, held on the 12th day of
June, 2001, by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
COUNCIL MEMBERS
COUNCIL MEMBERS
COUNCILMEMBERS
COUNCIL MEMBERS
-3-
ITEM 9
Ap p ROV/~ i[~'""-
CITY ATTORNEY Jr
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services ,1~,
June 12, 2001
Resolution Adopting FY 2001/2002 Solid Waste Rates
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
Barbara Smith, Management Analyst
That the City Council adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE SOLID WASTE RATES FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002
DISCUSSION: Pursuant to the existing solid waste franchise agreement with C R & R
Incorporated the rates charged for refuse and recycling services in the City of Temecula are subject
to annual review and modification. The franchise agreement provides for adjustments based upon
changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Riverside County landfill tipping fees. The CPI
increase as reported by the U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics is 3.3%. The
County of Riverside Waste Resources Management District has determined that there will be no
tipping fee increase in FY 2001-2002 at county landfills.
Pursuant to Amendment No. 3 dated July 25, 2000, the solid waste single family residential annual
rate for fiscal year 2001/2002 will remain at $172.56.
The solid waste commercial rates for fiscal year 2001/2002 reflect the 3.3% CPI increase and no
change in the tipping fee. The TCSD Board of Directors reviewed the single family residential
refuse and recycling collection rate on June, 12 2001 as a part of the proposed TCSD Rates and
Charges for FY 2001/2002.
R:~smithb\Trash~001-02 Rates-Council,doc June 12, 2001
The attached Exhibit "D" reflects the new rates for solid waste collection for all collection services to
become effective July 1,2001.
FISCAL IMPACT: No additional costs will be borne by the City of Temecula since these
services are paid for directly by the customers receiving the services.
Attachments:
Resolution
Exhibit "D"
U.S. Department of Labor, Consumer Price Index
R:\smithb\Trash~001-02 Rates-Council.doc June 12, 2001
RESOLUTION NO. 2001__
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE SOLID WASTE RATES FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2001- 2002.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does find, determine and
declare that:
a. The City of Temecula (the "City") and CR & R Incorporated ( the
"Grantee") entered into an exclusive franchise agreement on May 28, 1991 for the collection,
transportation, recycling, composting, and disposal of solid waste and construction debris and for
providing temporary bin/rolloff services in the City.
b. The franchise agreement provides for periodic rate adjustments based
on certain predefined criteria, specifically annual Consumer Price Index ("CPi") adjustments and
landfill tipping fee adjustments.
c. The franchise agreement further provides a formula to calculate the
fee adjustments to be made to the agreement on an annual basis.
d. The CPI adjustment is 3.3% for fiscal year 2001-2002.
e. There is no tipping fee adjustment for fiscal year 2001-2002.
f. The franchise agreement provides that the solid waste fee
adjustments are to be adopted by the City Council by Resolution.
Section 2. That the City of Temecula approves the solid waste fee adjustments
as shown in Exhibit "D" for fiscal year 2001-2002.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of the
Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 12th day of June 2001.
ATTEST:
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA )
SS
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution
No. 2001 - was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 12th day of June, 2001 by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
R :~smithb\Tr ashL2001-02 Rates Reso.doc
CITY of TEMECULA
Exhibit "D"
Schedule of Rates
(effective July 1, 2001)
Mechanized single family detached residential collection, recycling, composting, transfer, and
disposal grantee billing
Monthly Rate: $ 14.38
Mechanized single family detached residential collection, recycling, composting, transfer, and
disposal parcel charge
Monthly Rate: $ 14.38
Mechanized single family detached residential additional refuse, composting, and recycling
container - grantee billing
Monthly Rate: $ 5.71
Single family detached residential additional bulky item pick up - grantee billing
Pick Up Rate:
$ 6.90
Commercial. industrial, and multi-family residential refuse monthly bin rates ~ one 2 cubic
yard bin) with the following pick ups per week:
1 x week $ 67.44
2 x week $134.88
3 x week $ 202.32
4 x week $ 269.76
5 x week $ 337.20
6 x week $ 404.64
7 x week $ 472.08
Compacted 2 Cubic Yard monthly rate: 2.5 x monthly rate
Commercial, industrial, and multi-family residential refuse monthly bin rates (one 3 cubic
yard bin ) with the following pick ups per week:
1 x week $ 77.99
2 x week $155.98
3 x week $ 233.97
4 x week $ 311.96
5 x week $ 389.95
6 x week $ 467.94
7 x week $ 545.93
Compacted 3 Cubic Yard monthly:
2.5 x monthly rate
Commercial, industrial, and multi-family residential recycling monthly bin rates ( one 3 cubic
yard bin ) with the following pick ups per week:
1 x week $ 35.40
2 x week $ 70.80
3 x week $106.20
4 x week $141.60
5 x week $177.00
6 x week $ 212.40
7 x week $ 247.80
Commercial, industrial, and multi-family residential refuse monthly bin rates ( one 4 cubic yard
bin ) with the following pick ups per week:
1 xweek $ 88.57
2 x week $177.14
3 x week $ 265.71
4 x week $ 354.28
5 x week $ 442.85
6 x week $531.42
7 x week $ 619.99
Compacted 4 Cubic Yard monthly rate: 2.5 x monthly rate
Commercial, industrial, and multi-family residential recycling monthly bin rates ( one 4 cubic
yard bin ) with the following pick ups per week:
1 x week $' 46.88
2 x week $ 93.76
3 x week $140.64
4 x week $187.52
5 x week $ 234.40
6 x week $ 281.28
7 x week $ 328.16
10. Temporary 3 cubic yard bin rate:
11. Extra 3 cubic yard pick up:
12. Redeliver and reinstatement rate:
13. Roll-off disposal rate:
14. Roll-off recycling rate:
15. Roll-off compactor rate:
16. Roll-off recycling compactor rate:
17. "Hard to service" vehicle usage rate:
18. "Hard to service" bin moving rate:
19. Special bin lids (locking/CBL) rate:
20. Deodorizing / replacing bin rate:
$ 68.23
$ 35.38
$ 29.34
$159.38 + landfill/recycle fee
$159.38 minus market value
$ 221.92 + landfill/recycle fee
$ 221.92 minus market value
no charge
no charge
no charge
no charge
BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS (415) 975-4567 05-11-01 04:40p Page 02
ITEM 10
APPROVAL ~7///, ~
c,'rYA rORNE¥
DIRECTOR OF ~I~A~ ~
CI~ MANAGER (~()
CI~ OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council ~
~
Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manag~
June 12, 2001
Cost-Sharing Agreement with County of Riverside for Date/Cherry
"Flyover" Property Acquisition
RECOMMENDATION: Approve an agreement with Riverside County to share the costs of
acquiring right-of-way for the Date/Cherry "Flyover" project.
BACKGROUND: Traffic studies by Riverside County as part of the CETAP transportation
planning process have demonstrated the need for an additional road to relieve traffic on
Winchester Road from approximately Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Jefferson Ave. This general
alignment is consistent with General Plans of Temecula and Murrieta, and the County is
supportive of this project. The CETAP planning process has further indicated that a high-
capacity a "flyover" type of interchange at the junction of Date/Cherry with Winchester is needed
at this location to adequately handle the projected traffic. Such a design is also needed to divert
sufficient trips on to Date/Cherry so as to offer significant relief to Winchester. Furthermore,
these studies have indicated a need for such a project, even if the County does not further up-
zone properties to the north and east of Temecula.
City and County officials have also indicated a willingness to share the costs of acquisition of
right-of-way necessary for the "flyover" at Winchester Road and Murrieta Hot Springs Road.
Attached is an agreement that would formalize this understanding. Key points of this agreement
include:
· The City and County would equally share the costs of acquisition of this property. The
agreement provides for a maximum share of $3.1 million for each agency.
· The City would take the lead in this acquisition. The County would authorize the City to
use eminent domain, if needed.
The City would prepare an alignment study to further define the project alignment -
particularly westerly of the "flyover" project where additional development may be
imminent in Riverside County. The County would require dedication of right-of-way for
the Date/Cherry project based on the results of the alignment study.
The County would use its best efforts to provide reimbursement to the City and County
through TUMF, Development Impact Fees, Assessment Districts, or other mechanisms
for this project.
Consideration of this agreement is scheduled by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors for
June 19, 2001, contingent upon approval by the Temecula City Council.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached agreement.
FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this agreement would result in a net expenditure of $3.1
million for right-of-way acquisition. In addition, the City will incur a future expenditure of
approximately $100,000 for a roadway alignment study. Consideration of the alignment study
will be scheduled at a future Council meeting. Funds for these expenditures are available in the
Capital Reserves of the Capital Improvement Fund.
ATTACHMENT: Proposed Agreement.
JOINT PROJECT FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF
TEMECULA AND COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
(MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD / WINCHESTER ROAD)
This Agreement is made and entered into this 12th day of June, 2001 by and
between the County of Riverside, a political subdivision of the State of California
(hereinafter referred to as the "County") and the City of Temecula, a municipal
corporation and public agency existing under the laws of the State of California
(hereinafter referred to as the "City").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City and County have been exploring ways to accommodate
the traffic on Winchester Road through the City of Temecula;
WHEREAS, the City has identified on the Circulation Element of its General
Plan a bypass road from the intersection of Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Winchester
Road (SR 79N) to the 1-15 Freeway as an important traffic improvement for the City;
WHEREAS, CALTRANS is preparing a Project Study Report for an intemhange
on the i-15 Freeway between Winchester Road and the 1-215 Freeway which would
reduce traffic on Winchester Road within the City of Temecula;
WHEREAS; for the purposes of design and alignment study, the bypass mad is
divided into two segments the Western Segment and the Eastern Segment, which are
each described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference
as though set forth in full;
WHEREAS, through the County's CETAP process, a preliminary design has
been developed for the Eastern Segment which will include a "flyover" design for the
intersection of Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Winchester Road (SR 79N) as part of
the bypass road;
WHEREAS, it is necessary for the County and the City to begin preparations for
the improvements within the County and City which will facilitate the bypass road to
serve an interchange on the 1-15 Freeway between Winchester Road and the 1-215
Freeway;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DO HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
AGREEMENT
1. Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct.
AliRnment Study. Preliminary design studies conducted by the County through the
CETAP process for the Eastern Segment have identified the need for the "flyover"
design for that portion of the bypass road at Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Winchester
Road (SR 79N) as well as the necessary right of way for the flyover. The parties agree
that a more definitive alignment study of the bypass road is needed for Western
Segment and that design of the flyover should continue. City shall be responsible for the
preparation of an alignment study for the Western Segment of the bypass road and
continued design of the flyover within the Eastern Segment, which work shall be
conducted by a qualified engineering firm. City shall pay the costs of such study, the
cost of which is estimated at one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00).
Property Acquisition. The studies of the Eastern Segment completed thus far identify
certain properties, which will be required for the bypass read and flyover regardless of
the results of the remaining design studies for the flyover and design alternatives for the
Western Segment of the project. The interests in real property identified for the Eastern
Sector improvements are identified on Exhibit B ("Eastern Segment Properties"). The
City Manager of the City and the Chief Administrative Officer of the County are
authorized to amend this Agreement to further define or modify the description of
needed Properties in the Eastern Segment Properties, Exhibit "B", as the further design
studies may require. County and City each acknowledge the legal requirements
imposed on public agencies for the acquisition of interests in real property and, in
accordance with those restrictions, agree as follows:
City shall be the lead agency responsible for the process for acquiring the Eastern
Segment Properties. City shall be responsible for negotiating the purchases of the
property interests on behalf of the County and City. City shall comply with all legal
requirements for the acquisition of interests in real property by a public agency. City
shall keep the County full informed of the progress of the negotiations and consult
with the County during the course of the negotiations. In the event that the City
needs to advance funds for such acquisition, County will reimburse City as provided
further in this section.
County and City shall share equally in the costs of acquiring the Eastern Segment
Properties, provided that the share of each entity shall not exceed three million one
hundred thousand dollars ($3,100,000.00), unless an amendment to this Agreement
is approved by both parties. Such costs shall include, but not be limited to,
appraisals, consultants, legal fees, purchase price, and relocation benefits, but shall
not include staff time.
C. County shall pay its share of the costs described in subparagraph "A." of this section,
within twenty (20) days of a written demand from the City for payment for such a
cost.
D. The Eastern Segment Properties acquired through this Agreement shall be held in
the name of the County and City which each entitiy owning a one half interest in the
property acquired. County and City shall jointly sign the purchase and sale
agreements for such property interests.
Reimbursement of Costs from Development. In accordance with the legal restrictions
governing the imposition of development obligations, County agrees to use its best
efforts to obtain reimbursement for the costs of design and property interest acquisition
for the bypass road and all such costs incurred by the parties pursuant to this Agreement
through legally available means from properties identified in studies as ones expected to
utilize the bypass. Such legally available means include, but are not limited to,
transportation uniform mitigation fees, assessment district, bridge and thoroughfare
district, development impact fees, or similar financing mechanisms. County and City
shall each work cooperatively to pursue any state or federal grants for funding of the
bypass.
Eminent Domain. In accordance with all applicable legal requirements governing the
purchase of real property by governmental agencies of the State, the County and City
will use their best efforts to acquire the Eastern Segment Properties by negotiated
purchase. County hereby consents and authorizes City to exercise the power of
eminent domain within the unincorporated County territory on behalf of the County and
City for the purposes of acquiring the Eastern Segment Properties, if necessary.
Future Riqht of Way. Upon the approval of the alignment study for the Western
Segment, and for the Eastern Properties, County agrees to seek dedication of the
necessary right of way for the bypass road when it considers development of properties
along the Western Segment and the Eastern Segment. County shall enact any General
Plan or other development regulation changes necessary to facilitate such dedication.
Indemnification.
Neither County nor any officer or employee thereof shall be responsible for any
damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by
City under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to City
under this Agreement. It is further agreed that pursuant to Government Code
Section 895.4, City shall fully indemnify and hold County harmless from any liability
imposed for injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by
reason of any done or omitted to be done by City under or in connection with any
work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to City under this Agreement.
Neither City nor any officer or employee thereof shall be responsible for any damage
or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by County
under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to County
under this Agreement. It is further agreed that pursuant to Government Code
Section 895.4, County shall fully indemnify and hold City harmless from any liability
imposed for injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by
reason of any done or omitted to be done by County under or in connection with any
work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to County under this Agreement.
10.
11.
IIII
IIII
Disputes. Any disputes, which may arise between the County and the City during the
operation of this Agreement, shall be resolved without impact on the schedule or timing
of payments or the processing of demands for payment.
Notices. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this
Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii)
delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal
Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the
United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed
to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may
later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses
specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document with
United States Mail as provided above.
To County:
County of Riverside
4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor
Riverside, Ca. 92502
Attention: Chief Executive Officer
To City:
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Attention: City Manager
Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective upon acceptance by the Board
of Supervisors of the County and the City Council of the City and by execution by the
respective authorized representatives of each.
General. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties with
respect to the matters herein provided for, and may only be amended by a subsequent
written agreement executed by the parties. This Agreement may be executed in
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed originals, but which together shall
constitute a single agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered into this Agreement as of the
date first written above.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
James A. Venable
Chairman of the Board of Supervisors
Date:
ATTEST:
GERALD A. MALONEY, CLERK
OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
By:
Name:
Title:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN
By:
Name:
Title:
CITY OF TEMECULA
Jeff Comerchero
Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
EXHIBIT A
WESTERN SEGMENT AND EASTERN SEGMENT AREAS
Map showing Western Segment:
Alignment westerly of Murrieta Hot Springs Road
And Eastern Segment:
Alignment easterly of Murrieta Hot Springs Road
EXHIBIT B
EASTERN SEGMENT PROPERTIES
Assessor Parcel Numbers:
956-270-015
956-270-016
956-270-019
ITEM 11
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
~'iYb b~: nua:ne~/s~i~Y~l Dire ct~oirl of pla n n in g
June 12, 2001
Roripaugh Specific Plan - Status Report
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR.OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER /
PREPARED BY:
Saied Naaseh
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File
DISCUSSION:
Staff and the applicant continue to work on various documents such as the EIR, Development
Agreement, Plan of Services, and the Fiscal Impact Report for the project in an attempt to schedule
the project for the August 1, 2001 Planning Commission hearing and the August 15, 2001 City
Council hearing. Prior to these hearings, staff will schedule a Joint Planning Commission and City
Council Workshop for July 17th. Staff intends to present as complete of a package as possible for
this Workshop.
However, the EIR review process has taken a lot longer than expected because of the issues
surrounding the Traffic Study, changes to the project requested bythe applicant, and the insufficient
time allocated in the schedule for staff to review the EIR and the EIR consultant to address staff's
concerns. Therefore, the EIR has required six or seven partial-text screen checks instead of the
usual three or four full-text screen checks.
The Traffic Study remains one of the focal points of staff's review. The Traffic Study was submitted
on May 20th as scheduled. It should be noted that the Traffic Study was originally scheduled to be
submitted on May 9th; however, substantive changes to the study requested by staff (to make the
Study more "realistic") delayed the submittal of the Traffic Study. Fortunately, the applicant's EIR
consultant was successful in obtaining a verbal 30-day shortened review process for the EIR instead
of the 45-day review from the State Office of Planning and Research (OPR). A written confirmation
from OPR is expected but OPR has not committed to a specifc date.
Since the Traffic Study was delayed, staff's review of the EIR's traffic section was delayed
accordingly. Some of the off-site mitigation measures were introduced in the EIR for the first time on
the May 29th draft of the Screen Check EIR. In reviewing these mitigation measures, staff had to
request the applicant's Traffic Engineer on June 1st to re-examine some aspects of the Traffic Study.
R:~S P\Roripaugh Ranch SP\new\CC status Report June 12.doc
This requested information was submitted to staff on June 4th. Staff will be reviewing this information
by June 5th and will be meeting with the applicant's EIR consultant on June 6th to provide them with
staff's comments.
Because of these difficulties, the Applicant's Consultant Team has missed resubmittal deadlines on
several occasions. These delays and problems have meant that time originally envisioned to work
on the Specific Plan and the Tentative Maps has been spent on the EIR instead. Staff continues to
compress the end portion of the schedule as the project timeline shifts back. However, in the next
few weeks there will be no more time to compress and still meet the hoped for Planning Commission
and City Council hearing dates.
Another issue which has just came to staffs attention is an inconsistency in the project phasing
between the EIR and Traffic Study. To correct this issue, staff has directed the EIR consultant to
revise the EIR phasing consistent with the Traffic Study phasing. This change may require
preparation of subsequent Traffic Studies if the applicant wishes to change the phasing of the project
such as accelerating the development of the apartments from Phase 2 to Phase 1. In addition, the
two tentative maps for the project were submitted on May 22nd and 29th. Staff has not had a chance
to review these maps yet. The applicant has asked that all these applications be scheduled for the
August 1~ Planning Commission hearing. In addition, the applicant has requested staff to issue a
mass grading permit immediately after the August 15th City Council, if the project is approved.
Finally, Staff has met with the applicant a number of times on the Development Agreement.
However, one of the major issues which needs to be negotiated between staff and the applicant is
the extent of improvements that will be funded by the CFD. The applicant is over two weeks late in
providing the City with a list of improvements to be funded by the CFD. As the negotiating
progresses, staff will provide an update on the status of the Development Agreement. Staff will
continue to work with the applicant to comply with the City Council's direction to bring this project
forward to the August 15t~ City Council hearing and still meet the minimum legal requirements for an
EIR and Specific Plan.
FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
R:~S P~Roripaugh Ranch SPMcw~CC status P.~poR Juil~ 12.doc
2
ITEM 12
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OFFINANCE._~
ClTY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official~
June 12, 2001
Approval of Funds for Plan Review Services with Esgil Corporation
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an expenditure in an amount not to exceed
twenty five thousand ($25,000) dollars for Plan Check Services with Esgil Corporation.
BACKGROUND: In July 2000, the City Council approved an expenditure of $75,000 for Plan
Check Services with Esgil Corporation. Since that time, plan review activity increased resulting in a
need to come back to Council in early April with a request for an additional expenditure in the
amount of $50,000.
Plan check activity has continued at an increased level. Additionally, Building and Safety has
received plans for the expansion of Robinson's-May Department Store and staff is anticipating the
possible submittal of the Macy's Department Store project to occur before the end of this fiscal year.
The submittal of these projects was not anticipated during this fiscal. Therefore, adequate funds
were not requested in the budget preparation for this work.
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are currently available in Account No. 001-999-162-5248
"Consulting Services" for this purpose.
ITEM 13
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance~
June 12,2001
Annual Adjustment of Development Impact Fees
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the following resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA CONFIRMING THE ADJUSTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
IMPACT FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-02 TO BE EFFECTIVE
AUGUST 13, 2001 PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 15.06 OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AND RESOLUTION NOS. 97-94
AND 98-30
BACKGROUND: On May 27, 1997, the City Council adopted a schedule for residential and non-
residential development impact fees ("DIF"). These fees were based on a study completed by David
M. Griffith & Associates (DMG), which determined the total amount of DIF required to mitigate the
impacts of development through Temecula's build out, and further broke down the fees into specific
development categories.
Using the DIF study as a basis, the Council adopted residential development fees at 100%, and
non-residential fees at 36% of the total DIF recommended by DMG. In addition, the non-residential
DIF were adopted with a caveat that the fees would be reviewed each year by the Council so that
development trends could be considered prior to applying an additional escalation factor of 10%.
This additional 10% per year escalation was based on the Council's having adopted the non-
residential fees at 36% of the fees recommended by DMG. On December 8, 1998, the City Council
adopted the first annual adjustment of 10% to the non-residential fees. ,
Staff discussed the proposed annual 10% increase with the Economic Developm&nt Subcommittee
members Jeff Comerchero and Ron Roberts. Based on the number of permits issued over the past
six years, development in Temecula has continued to increase, even with the adopted DIF.
Therefore, the committee members concurred with the proposed increase since development
appears to have remained constant.
R:ICARAVELLI DENiSE~AGENDAStOIAGENDA~DIFADJUSTO1.DOC
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES CALCULATED
WITH BCl FEE INCREASE 8/13/2001
COMPONENT
Street System
Improvements
Traffic Signals and
Traffic Control
Systems
Corporate Facilities
Fire Protection
Facilities
CURRENT PROPOSED B.C.I
TYPE OF LAND USE FEES FEES INCREASE
(10% Increase)
(2.2%)
Residential Attached 535.91 535.91 547.70
Residential Detached 764.53 764.53 781.35
Office 0.938 1.055 1.078
Retail Commercial 2.895 3.257 3.329
Service Commercial 1.448 1.629 1.665
Business Parldlndustrial 0.686 0.772 0.789
Residential Attached 80.75 80.75 82.53
Residential Detached 114.31 114.31 116.82
Office 0.143 0.161 0.165
Retail Commercial 0.441 0.496 0.507
Service Commercial 0.220 0.248 0.253
Business Pa rkJlndustrial 0.105 0.118 0.121
Residential Attached 123.75 123.75 126.47
Residential Detached 232.82 232.82 237.94
Office 0.049 0.055 0.056
Retail Commercial 0.121 0.136 0.139
Service Commercial 0.067 0.075 0.077
Business Park/Industrial 0.041 0.046 0.047
Residential Attached 44.05 44,05 45.02
Residential Detached 57.68 57.68 58.95
Office 0.128 0.144 0.147
Retail Commercial 0.023 0.026 0.027
Service Commercial 0.018 0.020 0.020
Business ParkJlndustrial 0.016 0,018 0.018
Park and Recreation Residential Attached 1,267.94 1,267.94
Improvements Residential Detached 1,689.54 1,689.54
Office
Retail Commercial
Service Commercial
Business ParkJlndustrial
1,295.83
1,726.71
Libraries Residential Attached 163.61 163.61
Residential Detached 218.14 218.14
Office
Retail Commercial
Service Commercial
Business Park/Industrial
TOTAL DEVELOPMENT Residential Attached 2,216.01 2,216.01
IMPACT FEE PER Residential Detached 3,077.03 3,077.03
UNIT Office 1.258 1.415
Retail Commercial 3.480 3.915
Service Commercial 1.753 1.972
Business ParkJlndustdal 0.848 0.954
NOTE: Fees for residential development are calculated per dwelling unit. Fees for non-residential
development are calculated per square foot of gross building area.
167.21
222.94
2,264.76
3,144.71
1.446
4.001
2.015
0.975
brownp/dif/dif01-02/DIF Staff Report Attachment Schedules
11:46 AM 06/04/2001
AT'I~ACHMEN~ "A"
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES PROJECTED REVENUE COMPARISON
WITH DIF FEE INCREASE
WITHOUT FEE INCREASE OVER FIVE YEARS
I FY01/02 FY02/03 FY03/04 FY04/05 FY05/06 I TOTAL
Residential 1,829,383 1,806,046 1,389,814 1,773,275 1,773,275 8,571,793
Office 31,450 51,700 103,400 155,100 206,800 548,450
Retail Comm 708,000 704,000 174,000 348,000 174,000 2,108,000
Service Comm 175,300 87,650 175,300 350,600 350,600 1,139,450
Bus Park/Ink 113,067 169,600 226,133 169,600 226,133 904,533
Less: DIF reduction agreement (300,000) (300,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (900,000)
TOTAL DIF 2,557,200 2,518,996 1,968,647 2,696,575 2,630,808 12,372,226
WITH FEE INCREASE OVER FIVE YEARS
I FY01/02 FY02/03 FY03/04 FY04/05 FY05/06 I TOTAL I
Residential 1,829,383 1,806,046 1,389,814 1,773,275 1,773,275 8,571,793
Office 35,381 58,163 116,325 174,488 232,650 617,007
Retail Comm 796,500 792,000 195,750 391,500 195,750 2,371,500
Service Comm 197,213 98,606 197,213 394,425 394,425 1,281,882
Bus Park/Ink 127,200 190,800 254,400 190,800 254,400 1,017,600
Less: DIF reduction agreement (300,000) (300,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (900,000)
TOTAL DIF 2,685,677 2,645,615 2,053,502 2,824,488 2,750,500 12,959,782
TOTAL INCREASE
FY01/02 FY02/03 FY03/04 FY04/05 FY05/06 I TOTAL
128,477 126,619 84,855 127,914 119,692 587,556
brownpldifldifOl-O21DIF REVENUE2
.!
ATTACHMENT "B~
06/06/2001 2:24 PM
A development summary by square footage is as follows:
Commercial Development
Fiscal Year
94-95
95-96
96-97
97-98
98-99
99-00
00-01'
Total
Square
Footage
63,204
84,393
274,762
1,198,250
732,797
2,673,481
538,989
5,565,876
Industrial Development
Fiscal Year Square
Footage
94-95 416,814
95-96 178,619
96-97 427,826
97-98 867,137
98-99 526,838
99-00 937,802
00-01' 554,798
Total 3,909,834
*Projected through June 30, 2001
Since development appears not to have been negatively affected by the adoption of DIF, Staff
recommends that the 10% increase pursuant to Resolutions 97-94 and 98-30 continue for non-
residential DIF.
FISCAL IMPACT: If the fees are set applying the 10% escalation factor to non-residential
development, then the City will have a projected total DIF revenue increase of $128,477 in fiscal
year 2001-02 (see Attachment B).
Attachments:
A. DIF Calculated with DIF Fee Increase
B. DIF Revenue Comparison with DIF Fee increase
C. Resolution No. 2001 __
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA CONFIRMING THE ADJUSTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
IMPACT FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-02 TO BE EFFECTIVE
AUGUST 13, 2001 PURSUANT TOO CHAPTER 15.06 OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AND RESOLUTION NOS. 97-94
AND 98-30
NOW BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows:
Section 1. TheCityCounciloftheCityofTemeculadoes herebyfind, determine and declare as
follows:
A. On May 27, 1997, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 97-09 establishing Chapter 15.06
of the Temecula Municipal Code, Public Facilities Development Impact Fee ("DIF"), which was
modified by Ordinance No. 97-14 on August 26, 1997, and was further modified by Ordinance No.
98-05 on April 14, 1998.
B. On May 27, 1997, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 97-45 which established the
Development Impact Fees. This Resolution was restated and modified by Resolution 97-94 on
August 12, 1997, and was further modified by Resolution No. 98-30 on April 14, 1998.
C. The City Council adopted residential DIF as recommended in a Development Impact Fee
Study conducted by David M. Griffith and Associates ("DMG"), and adopted non-residential DIF at
36% of the amount recommended by DMG.
D. Resolution 98-30 provides for an automatic annual adjustment of both residential and non-
residential DIF based on the percentage increase or decrease, if any, of the Engineering News
Record Building Cost Index ("BCI") for the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area BCI for the twelve month
period prior to May I of the year in which the change will be effective.
E. Exhibit B to Resolution 98-30 contains projected fees for seven (7) years with no escalation
applied to residential DIF and an escalation of 10% per year applied to non-residential DIF.
F. Non-residential development in Temecuta has not declined since DIF were adopted in May
of 1997and subsequently adjusted by 10% in December of 1998 and May of 2000.
Section 2. ExhibitAto Resolution 97-94 is hereby amended by Exhibit A to this Resolution. This
amended Exhibit A sets forth the levels of development impact fees for the city of Temecula to
collect for residential and non-residential development effective August 13, 2001, pursuant to the
schedule of adjustments established in Resolutions 97-94 and 98-30.
R:ICARA VELLI DENISEb4GEND~SIOIAGENDA IDIFADJUSTOI.DOC 6/6/01
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular
meeting held on the 12th day of June, 2001.
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:ICARA VELLI DENiSE~4GENDAStOIAGENDA[DIFADJUSTOI.DOC 6/6/01
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution
No. 2001- __ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 12th day of June 12, 2001, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNClLMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNClLMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:[CARA VELU DENISEb4GENDASIOIAGENDAIDIFADJUSTO1.DOC 6/6/01
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES CALCULATED
WITH BCI FEE INCREASE 8/13/2001
COMPONENT
Street System
Improvements
Traffic Signals and
Traffic Control
Systems
Corporate Facilities
Fire Protection
Facilities
CURRENT PROPOSED B.C.I
TYPE OF LAND USE FEES FEES INCREASE
(10% Increase)
(2.2%)
Residential Attached 535.91 535.91 547.70
Residential Detached 764.53 764.53 781.35
Office 0.938 1.055 1.078
Retail Commercial 2.895 3.257 3.329
Service Commercial 1.448 1.629 1.665
Business ParkJlndustrial 0.686 0.772 0.789
Residential Attached 80.75 80.75 82.53
Residential Detached 114.31 114.31 116.82
Office 0.143 0,161 0.165
Retail Commercial 0.441 0.496 0.507
Service Commercial 0.220 0,248 0.253
Business Parldlndustrial 0.105 0.118 0.121
Residential Attached 123.75 123.75 126.47
Residential Detached 232.82 232.82 237.94
Office 0.049 0.055 0.056
Retail Commercial 0.121 0.136 0.139
Service Commercial 0,067 0.075 0~077
Business Park/Industrial 0.041 0,046 0.047
Residential Attached 44.05 44.05 45.02
Residential Detached 57.68 57.68 58.95
Office 0.128 0.144 0.147
Retail Commercial 0.023 0,026 0.027
Service Commercial 0.018 0.020 0,020
Business Park/Industrial 0.016 0,018 0.018
Park and Recreation Residential Attached 1,267.94 1,267.94
Improvements Residential Detached 1,689.54 1,689.54
Office
Retail Commercial
Service Commercial
Business Parldlndustrial
Libraries Residential Attached 163.61 163.61
Residential Detached 218.14 218.14
Office
Retail Commercial
Service Commercial
Business Park/Industrial
TOTAL DEVELOPMENT Residential Attached 2,216.01 2,216.01
IMPACT FEE PER Residential Detached 3,077.03 3,077.03
UNIT Office 1.258 1.415
Retail Commercial 3.480 3.915
Service Commercial 1.753 1.972
Business Park/Indus~al 0.848 0.954
NOTE: Fees for residential development are calculated per dwelling unit. Fees for non-residential
development are calculated per square foot of gross building area.
1,295.83
1,726.71
167.21
222.94
2,264.76
3,144.71
1.446
4.001
2.015
0,975
brownp/dif/dif01-02JDIF Staff Report Attachment Schedules
~-x- [BIT 'A'"
11:46 AM 06/04/2001
ITEM 14
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANiZE,~;~//~_~
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
/~jDWilliam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 12, 2001
Approval of the Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Solicit Bids
for the Starlight Ridge Southern Cross Road Sidewalk Project -
Project No. PW00-22
PREPARED BY:
Amer Attar, Senior Engineer
Bruce Levy, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Make a finding that the Starlight Ridge Southern Cross Road Sidewalk Project is
categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15301 (c) of the CEQA guidelines.
Approve the Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to
solicit public construction bids for the Starlight Ridge Southern Cross Road Sidewalk
Project No. PW00-22.
BACKGROUND: The plans, specifications and contract documents for this project have been
completed and are now ready to be advertised for construction bids. The project will include the
installation of permanent sidewalks on the north side of Southern Cross Road between Rancho
Vista Road and Margarita Road. This project will facilitate pedestrian safety and accessibility,
especially for children and residents in the surrounding areas to walk to and from existing parks,
schools and retail shops.
The sidewalk will benefit pedestrian safety, encourage the use of alternate modes of transpodation,
and complete missing links in existing sidewalk improvements. In addition to the City, local area
residents and the Temecula Valley Unified School District (TVUSD) are in support of this project.
The Engineer's estimate for this project is $58,680.00
FISCAL IMPACT: Starlight Ridge Southern Cross Road Sidewalk Project is a Capital
Improvement Project and is funded by Development Impact Fees and SB 821 funds.
ATTACHMENTS: None
1
R:~AGDRP'i52001~0612~PW00-22Bid. DOC
ITEM 15
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAl
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF F~NANCE~
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 12, 2001
Parcel Map No. 29949, Located at the Easterly Terminus of Lolita Road, in
an Urbanized Area of Los Ranchitos
PREPARED BY:
Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Reza James, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City council approve: 1 ) Parcel Map 29949 in conformance
with the conditions of approval; 2) Subdivision Monument agreement; 3) and accept the
Performance Bond for Improvement as security for the Monument agreement.
BACKGROUND: On March 8, 2001 the Director of Planning for the City of Temecula
approved Tentative Parcel Map 29949 Subject to the conditions of approval. Parcel Map No. 29949
is a (1) pamel residential subdivision of 20 net acres. The Developer is required to pay $10,000 for
each parcel to be used towards the establishment of an Assessment District and/or financing and
improvement of Lolita Road and John Warner both to Jeramie Drive within 90 days of recordation of
the parcel map. Developer has met all of the Conditions of Approval for recordation of the parcel
map.
The final map is in conformance with the approved tentative map. The approval of a final
subdivision map, which substantially complies with the previously approved tentative map, is a
mandatory ministerial act under the State law.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
No alternatives were considered
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
2.
3.
4.
Project Vicinity Map
Parcel Map No. 29949
Development Fee check list
Fees and securities report
I
R:~agdrpt~2001\0612\PM29949
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
PARCEL MAP NO. 29949 DATE: June 12, 2001
IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY
SECURITY
Signal Improvement $ 20,000 $
Water $ $
Sewer $ $
TOTAL $ $
Monument $ $ 1,000
DEVELOPMENT FEES
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
RCFCD (ADP) Fee
Development Impact Fee
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
Fees Paid to Date
Balance of Fees Due
$ 0.00
$ TBD
$ TBD
$ 54.00
$ 4.00
$ 750.00
$ 250.00
$ 1,105.00
$ o.oo
2
R:~agdrpfi2001\O612\PM29949
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO. PARCEL MAP 29949
The following fees were reviewed by Staffrelative to their applicability to this project.
FEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Development Impact Fee to be paid prior to issuance of certificate of
occupancy
Quimby Fee to be paid prior to issuance of building
permit
RCRCD(ADP) Fee to be paid prior to issuance of building
permit
3
R:~agdrpt~2001 \0612\PM29949
8rtE
VICINITY MAP
N.T.$.
~ LOL/TA ROAD
N69'O6'32"W (R)
517.30'
ITEM 16
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE.~.._
CITY MANAGER ---('~-~ Il
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 12, 2001
Parcel Map No. 30012, Located south east corner of North General Kearny
Road and Margarita Road
PREPARED BY:
Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Gerald L. Alegria, Senior Engineer- Land Development
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve 1) Parcel Map No. 30012 in
conformance with the Conditions of Approval 2) Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the
Monument Deposit as security for the agreement.
BACKGROUND: Parcel Map No. 30012 is two (2) parcel subdivision located on the
south east corner of North General Kearny Road and Margarita Road. The off-site street
improvements are in place.
On April 5, 2001, the Planning Commission for the City of Temecula approved Tentative Parcel Map
No. 30012, with the appropriate condition of approvals. This final map is in conformance with the
approved tentative map. The approval of a final subdivision map, which substantially complies with
the previously approved tentative map is a mandatory ministerial act under State law.
The following fees have been deferred for Parcel Map No. 30012:
Development Impact Fee due prior to issuance ora building permit.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
2.
3.
4.
Development Fee Checklist
Fees & Securities Report
Project Vicinity Map
Parcel Map No. 30012
I
r:\agdrpt~001\0612\pm30012.map
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO. PM 30012
Staff reviewed the following fees relative to their applicability to this project.
FEE
Flood Control (ADP)
Development Impact Fee
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Paid
To be paid prior to issuance of a building
permit
2
r:~agdrpt~001\0612\pm30012.map
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
PARCEL MAP NO. 30012 DATE: June 12, 2001
IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY
SECURITY
Street and Drainage $ 0 $ 0
Water $ 0 $ 0
Sewer $ 0 $ 0
TOTAL $ 0 $ 0
Monument $ 600
DEVELOPMENT FEES
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
RCFCD (ADP) Fee
Development Impact Fee
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
Fees Paid to Date
Balance of Fees Due
$ 0,00
$ Paid
$ T.B.D.
$ 56.00
$ 4.00
$ 790.00
$ 250.00
$ 1,100.00
$ o.oo
r:~agdrpt~001\0612\pm30012.map
~ Bank of America Investment CD Receipt
BANKING CENTER TEMECULA No. 723 DATE 5/9/01
CUSTOMER NAME **MARGARITA MEDICAL C0~0PMENT** INTEREST RATE 5.00
ANNUAL PERCENTAGE YIELD 5. $ AMOUNT
FOR BONDING PURPOSES ONLY ACCOUNT TERM qO days
PLE,~DGEDTO ,_,CIT~. O~ TEME/?~LA, CALZFOtLNIA MATURITY DATE 8/7/01
(/~t'__ ~__ ACCOUNT# ~77~? -- ~?B2q
The written information we give you is part of your agreement with us and tells you the current terms of this account. This time deposit
reinvests automatically for the same account term upon maturity or on the effective date of a deposit or withdrawal made during the grace
period. (The grace period begins on the maturity date and is two business days for terms of 29 days or less; five calendar days for terms of
30 days through 89 days; seven calendar days for terms of 90 days or more.) We determine the interest rate for the reinvested deposit on
the date your funds are reinvested.
For information about early withdrawal penalties, please see the deposit agreement, a personal time deposit is not transferable.
R-162 4-99 NOT NEGOTIABLE ~'%_ReC~led BankofAmericaNT&SA{Namechangesto
Bank of America N.A. after July 23, 1999) · Member FDiC
CITY OF TEMECULA
CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT AGREEMENT FOR IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula, State of California, and ~--~ 'f) b,t/'/q-~ ]5)
fl~l A/'LD ~'~,,.q'~S:'/~ (hereinafter designated as "PRINCIPAL") have entered into an agreement
whereby Principal agrees to install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said
agreement, dated ~~., and identified as Project /~dtq~t~-/~.~[-f'A Al{ ~'D/C,,,~t-~..
.,D~O~'LoP~O~s hereby referred to and make a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, Principal is required under the terms of the agreement to furnish CERTIFICATE OF
DEPOSIT in the name of the CITY OF TEMECULA OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, for the sum of
S ~'oo. oo .
NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed between the Principal and the CITY OF TEMECULA by and
through its City Engineer, as follows:
Concurrently with executing this Agreement, the Principal will provide a CERTIFICATE
OF DEPOSIT in the name of the CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, for the sum of
The condition of the CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT is such that the obligation shall become
null and void of the above-bounded Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators,
successors, or assign, shall in all things stand to, abide by, well and truly keep, and
perform the covenants, conditions, and provisions of this Agreement.
In the event the Principal fails to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement,
the City may use the CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT to complete the work described in the
agreement, and to make the premises described in the agreement safe to life and property
to the-ga~Sfaction of the City Engineer. Further, the Principal will pay to the CITY OF
TEMECULA, all costs a~d expenses incurred ~3~ th~ City not otherwise covered by the
CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified
therefore there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including
reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all
to be taxed as costs and included in any judgement rendered.
-1- R:\AGMTS\LDAG MTS\Cert of dep-irnprov
The Principal hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or
addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the
specifications accompanying the same shall in any way affect it obligation hereunder, and
it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition
to the terms of the Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the PRINCIPAL ON
CITY OF TEMECULA
By: By:
William G. Hughes
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
(Title)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorson
CiO, Attorney
(ATTACH NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS)
-2- R:\AGMTS\LDAGMTS\Cert of dep-improv
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
County of ,
On ~/I~]/0] before~./~{~, '
personally appeared ~.~)~
NAME(S} OF SIGNER(S)
-personally known to me OR [] proved to me on the basis of sa.t~.factory evidence to be
, the person(~'~' whose name(~ ~=~re subscribed to the
_..in instrument and acknow~led to me that
he/they executed the ~,~3e in ,.~er/their authorized
ca~city(~, and that b,~er/their signature(~on the
instrument the p,er;,~on.(~, or the entity upon behalf of
which the person[~jL.acted, executed the instrument.
WI'r~SS my~'~h~d and official seal -'~
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could
prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNED
[] INDIVIDUAL
DESCRIPTION OF ATFACHED DOCUMENT
[] CORPORATE OFFICER
TITLE(S}
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
[] LIMITED PARTNER(S)
[] GENERAL PARTNER(S)
[] A'I-I'OR N EY-I NIFACT
NUMBER OF PAGES
[] TRUSTEE(S)
[] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
DATE OF DOCUMENT
[] OTHER:
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(lES)
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
CITY OF TEMECULA
SUBDIVISION MONUMENT AGREEMENT
DATE OF AGREEMENT:
NAME OF SUBDWDER: E _I'D .t~,.q- ~ .l~
(referred to as "SUBDIVIDER")
NAME OF SUBDIVISION:/V[/1~8:.4 ~.P'/"A
(referred to as "SUBDIVISION")
TRACT NO.:
~oo1~
TENTATIVE MAP RESOLUTION OF
APPROVAL NO.: /-~.~o / - O lq
(referred to as "Resolution of Approval")
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENTS:
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF MONUMENTATION:
s ~;oo.oo
COMPLETION DATE:
NAME OF SURETY AND BOND NO. FOR SUBDIVISION MONUMENT BOND:
C.w ~'r-/~tCAv-W oF t~F'os~ T
SUBDIVISION MONUMENT AGREEMENT
Tiffs agreement is made and entered into by and between the City ofTemccula, Califomia, a Municipal
Corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as CITY, and the SLrBDIVIDER.
RECITALS
SUBDIVIDER has presented to CITY for approval and recordation, a final subdivision map
of a proposed subdivision pursuant to provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of
California and the CITY ordinances and regulations relating to the filing, approval and
recordation of subdivision maps. The Subdivision Map Act and the CITY ordinances and
regulations relating to the filing, approval and recordation of subdivision maps are collectively
referred to in this agreement as the "Subdivision Laws".
A tentative map of the SUBDMSION has been approved, subject to the Subdivision Laws
and to the requirements and conditions contained in the Resolution of Approval. The
Resolution of Approval is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and is incorporated into this
agreement by reference.
The Subdivision Laws establish as a condition precedent to the approval of a final map that
SUBDIVIDER must have complied with the Resolution of Approval and must have either (a)
completed, in compliance with CITY standards, all of the improvements and land
development work required by the Subdivision Laws and the Resolution of Approval or, Co)
have entered into a secured agreement with CITY to complete the improvements and land
development within a period of time specified by CITY.
In consideration of approval of a final map for the SUBDMSION by the City Council,
SUBDIVIDER desires to enter into this agreement, whereby SUBDIVIDER promises to
install and complete, at SUBDIVIDER'S own expanse, all monumentation required by CITY
in connection with the proposed subdivision. SUBDIVIDER has secured this agreement by
improvement security required by the Subdivision Laws and approved by the City Attomey.
For the purpose of this agreement, the only improvements that remain to be completed for this
unit is installation of the subdivision monumentation, and Aimprovements as used throughout
this agreement implies said monumentation.
An estimate of the cost of the Subdivision Monumentation, has been made and have been
approved bythe City Engineer. The estimated amount is stated on Page 1 of this agreement.
The basis for the estimate is attached as Exhibit "A" to this agreement.
SUBDIVIDER recognizes that by approval of the final map for SUBDIVISION, CITY has
conferred substantial rights upon SUBDIVIDER, including the right to sell, lease, or finance
lots within the SUBDMSION, and has taken the fmal act necessary to subdivide the property
within the SUBDIVISION. As a result, CITY will be damaged to the extent of the cost of
installation of the improvements by SUBDIVIDER'S failure to perform its obligations under
this agreement, including, but not limited to, SUBDIVIDER'S obligation to complete
installation of the Subdivision Monumentation by the time established in this agreement.
CITY shall be entitled to all remedies available to it pursuant to this agreement and the
Subdivision Laws in the event of a default by SUBDIVIDER. It is specifically recognized
that the determination of whether a reversion to acreage or rescission of the SUBDIVISION
constitutes an-adequate remedy for default by the SUBDIVIDER_shall_be_within the sole
discretion of CITY.
SUBDIVISION MONUMENT AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the approval and recordation by the City Council of the final
map of the SUBDMSION, SUBDIVIDER and CITY agree as follows;
1. SUBDIVIDER'S Obligations to Construct Improvements. SUBDIVIDER shall:
Install all SUBDMSION monuments required by law within eighteen (18) months
of the date of this agreement.
Nothing in this Section 1 shall be construed as authorizing or granting an extension of time to
SUBDIVIDER.
Security SUBDIVIDER shall at all times guarantee SUBDIVIDER'S performance of this
agreement by furnishing to CITY, and maintaining, good and sufficient security as required
by the Subdivision Laws on forms approved by CITY for the purposes and in the mounts as
follows:
Good and sufficient security in the amount of 100% of the estimated cost of setting
subdivision monuments as stated previously in this agreement.
The securities required by this agreement shall be kept on file with the City Clerk. The terms of the security
documents referenced on Page 1 of this agreement are incorporated into this agreement by this reference. If
any security is replaced by another approved security, the replacement shall be filed with the City Clerk and,
upon filing, shall be deemed to have been made a part of and incorporated into this agreement. Upon filing of
a replacement security with the City Clerk, the former security may be released.
Inspection. SUBDIVIDER shall at all times maintain proper facilities and safe access for
inspection of the monumentation by CITY inspector. Upon completion of the work the
SUBDIVIDER may request a final inspection by the City Engineer, or the City Engineer's
authorized representative. If the City Engineer, or the designated representative, determine
that the work has been completed in accordance with this agreement, then the City Engineer
shall certify the completion of the monumentation to the City Council. SUBDIVIDER shall
bear all costs of inspection and certification.
Release of Securities. Subject to approval by the City Council of CITY, the securities
required by this agreement shall be released as follows:
Security given for installation of the Subdivision Monumentation shall be released
upon the final completion and acceptance of the act or work.
Iniurv to Public Improvements, Public Property or Public Utilities Facilities. SUBDIVIDER
shall replace or have replaced, or repair or have repaired, as the case may be, all public
improvements, public utilities facihties and surveying or subdivision monuments which are
destroyed or damaged as a result of any work under this agreement. SUBDIVIDER shall bear
the entire cost of replacement or repairs of any and all public or public utility property
damaged or destroyed by reason of any work done under this agreement, whether such
property is owned by the United States or any agency thereof, or the State of California, or
any agency or political subdivision thereof, or by the CITY or any public or private utility
corporation or.byany combination of such owners. Anyrepair or. replacement shall be to the
satisfaction, and subject to the approval, of the City Engineer.
SUBDIVISION MONUMENT AGREEMENT
Permits. SUBDIVIDER shall, at SUBDIVIDER'S expense, obtain all necessary
permits and licenses for the construction and installation of the improvements, give all
necessary notices and pay all fees and taxes required by law.
7. Default of SUBDIVIDER.
Default of SUBDIVIDER shall include, but not be limited to, SUBDIVIDER'S
failure to timely commence construction of this agreement;
SUBDIVIDER'S failure to timely complete installation of the monumentation.
SUBDIVIDER'S insolvency, appointment of a receiver, or the filing of any petition
in bankruptcy either voluntary or involuntary which SUBDIVIDER fails to discharge
within thirty (30) days; the commencement of a foreclosure action against the
SUBDIVISION or a portion thereof, or any conveyance in lieu or in avoidance of
foreclosure; or SUBDIVIDER'S failure to perform any other obligation under this
agreement.
The CITY reserves to itself all remedies available to it at law or in equity for breach
of SUBDIVIDER'S obligations under this agreement. The CITY shall have the right,
subject to this section, to draw upon or utilize the appropriate security to mitigate
CITY damages in event of default by SUBDIVIDER. The right of CITY to draw
upon or utilize the security is additional to and not in lieu of any other remedy
available to CITY. It is specifically recognized that the estimated costs and security
amounts may not reflect the actual cost of installation of the improvements and,
therefore, CITY damages for SUBDIVIDER'S default shall be measured by the cost
of completing the required improvements. The sums provided by the improvement
security may be used by CITY for the completion of the public improvements in
accordance with the final map and specifications contained herein.
In the event- of SUBDIVIDER'S default under this agreement, SUBDIVIDER
authorizes CITY to perform such obligation twenty days after mailing written notice
of default to SUBDIVIDER and to SUBD1VIDER'S Surety, and agrees to pay the
entire cost of such performance by CITY.
CITY may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion, by contract or
by any other method CITY may deem advisable, for the account and at the expense
of SUBDIVIDER, and SUBDIVIDER'S Surety shall be liable to CITY for any
excess cost or damages occasioned CITY thereby; and, in such event, CITY, without
liability for so doing, may take possession of, and utilize in completing the work,
such materials, appliances, plant and other property belonging to SUBDIVIDER as
may be on the site of the work and necessary for performance of the work.
e. Failure of SUBDIVIDER to comply with the terms of this agreement shall constitute
consent to the filing by CITY of a notice of violation against all the lots in the
SUBDIVISION, or to rescind the approval or otherwise revert the SUBDIVISION to
acreage. The remedy provided by this Subsection c is in addition to and not in lieu of
other remedies available to CITY. SUBDIVIDER agrees that the choice of remedy
or remedies for SUBDIVIDER'S breach shall be in the discretion of CITY.
f. __In the ev~ent that S _Lr~_ DIVIDER fails to perform any obligation he[eunder,
SUBDIVIDER agrees to pay all costs and expenses incurred by CITY in securing
performance of such obligations, including costs of suit and reasonable attorney's
fees,
4
SUBDIVISION MONUMENT AGREEMENT
10.
11.
12.
The failure of CITY to take an enforcement action with respect to a default, or to
declare a breach, shall not be construed as a waiver of that default or breach or any
subsequent default or breach of SUBDIVIDER.
SUBDIVIDER Not Agent of CITY. Neither SUBDIVIDER nor any of SUBDIVIDER'S
agents or contractors are or shall be considered to be agents of CITY in connection with the
performance of SUBDIVIDER'S obligations under this agreement.
Iniury to Work. Until such time as the improvements are accepted by CITY, SUBDIVIDER
shall be responsible for and bear the risk of loss to any of the installed improvements. Until
such time as all improvements required by this agreement are fully completed and accepted by
CITY, SUBDIVIDER will be responsible for the care, maintenance of, and any damage to
such improvement. CITY shall not, nor shall any officer or employee thereof, be liable or
responsible for any accident, loss or damage, regardless of cause, happening or occurring to
the work or improvements specified in this agreement prior to the completion and acceptance
of the work or improvements. All such risks shall be the responsibility of and are hereby
assumed by SUBDIVIDER.
Other A~reements. Nothing contained in this agreement shall preclude CITY fi.om expending
monies pursuant to agreements concurrently or previously executed between the parties, or
fi.om entering into agreements with other subdividers for the apportionment of costs of water
and sewer mains, or other improvements, pursuant to the provisions of the CITY ordinance
providing therefore, nor shall anything in this agreement commit CITY of any such
apportionment.
Final Acceptance of Work. Acceptance of the work on behalf of CITY shall be made by City
Council upon recommendation of the City Engineer after final completion and inspection of
all monumentation. The City Council shall act upon the Engineer's recommendation within
thirty (30) days fi.om the date the City Engineer certifies that the work has been finally
completed, as provided in Paragraph 3.
Indemn!ty/Hold Harmless. CITY or any officer or employee thereof shall not be liable for
any injury to persons or property occasioned by reason of the acts or omissions of
SUBDIVIDER, its agents or employees in the performance of this agreement. SUBDIVIDER
further agrees to protect and hold harmless CITY, its officials and employees fi.om any and all
claims, demands, causes or action, liability or loss of any sort, because of, or arising out of,
acts or omissions of SUBDIVIDER, its agents or employees in the performance of this
agreement, including all claims, demands, causes of action, liability, or loss because of, or
arising out of, in whole or in part, the installation or review of the improvements. Provisions
of this paragraph shall remain in full fome and effect for ten years following the acceptance
by the CITY of improvements. It is the intent of this section that SUBDIVIDER shall be
responsible for all liability for installation and inspection of the improvements installed or
work done pursuant to this agreement and that CITY shall not be liable for any negligence,
nonfeasance, misfeasance or malfeasance in approving, reviewing, checking, or correcting any
map or specifications or in approving, reviewing or inspecting any work or construction. The
improvement security shall not be required to cover the provisions of this paragraph:
Sale or Disposition of SUBDMSION. Sale or other disposition of this property will not
relieve SUBDIVIDER fi.om the obligations set forth herein. If SUBDIVIDER sells the
property or any portion of the property within the SUBDMSION to any other person, the
SUBDIVIDER may request a novation of this agreement and a substitution of security. Upon
SUBDIVISION MONUMENT AGREEMENT
14.
15.
16.
17.
approval of the novation and substitution of securities, the SUBDIVIDER may request a
release or reduction of the securities required by this agreement. Nothing in the novation
shall relieve the SUBDIVIDER of the obligations under Paragraph 17 for thc work or
improvement done by SUBDIVIDER.
Time of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this agreement.
Time for Completion of Work/Time Extensions. SUBDIVIDER shall complete construction
of the improvements required by this agreement within eighteen (18) months of this
agreement. In the event good cause exists as determined by the City Engineer, the time for
completion of the improvements hereunder may be extended. The extension shall be made by
whting executed by the City Engineer. Any such extension may be granted without notice to
SUBDIVIDER's Surety and shall not affect the validity of this agreement or release the Surety
or Sureties on any security given for this agreement. The City Engineer shall be the sole and
final judge as to whether or not good cause has been shown to entitle SUBDIVIDER to an
extension. Delay, other than delay in the commencement of work, resulting fi.om an act of
CITY, or by an act of God, which SUBDIVIDER could not have reasonable foreseen, or by
storm or inclement weather which prevent the conducting of work, and which were not caused
by or contributed to by SUBDIVIDER, shall constitute good cause for an extension of the
time for completion. As a condition of such extension, the City Engineer may require
SUBDIVIDER to furnish new security guaranteeing performance of this agreement as
extended in an increased amount as necessary to compensate for any increase in construction
costs as determined by the City Engineer.
No Vesting of Rights. Performance by SUBDIVIDER of this agreement shall 'not be
construed to vest SUBDIVIDER'S rights with respect to any change in any zoning or building
law or ordinance.
Notices. All notices required or provided for under this agreement shall be in writing and
delivered in person or sent by mail, postage prepaid and addressed as provided in this Section.
Notice shall be effective on the date it is delivered in person, or, if mailed, on the date of
deposit in the United States Mail. Notices shall be addressed as follows unless a written
change of address is filed with the City:
Notice to CITY:
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Notice to SUBDIVIDER:
SUBDIVISION MONUMENT AGP~EMENT
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
Severability. The provisions of this agreement are severable. Ifanypordon of this agreement
is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the agreement shall
remain in full force and effect unless amended or modified by the mutual consent of the
parties.
Captions. The captions of this agreement are for convenience and reference only and shall
not define, explain, modify, limit, exemplify, or aid in the interpretation, construction or
meaning of any provisions of this agreement.
Litigation or Arbitration. In the event that suit or arbitration is brought to enforce the terms of
this contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to litigation costs and reasonable attorneys'
fees.
Incorporation of Recitals. The Recitals to this agreement are hereby incorporated into the
terms of this agreement.
Entire Agreement. This agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties with reSpect
to the subject matter. All modifications, amendments, or waivers of the ~terms of this
agreement must be in writing and signed by the appropriate representatives of the parties. In
the case of the CITY, the appropriate party shall be the City Manager.
SUBDIVISION MONUMENT AGREEMENT
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement is executed by CITY, by and through its Mayor.
SUBDIVIDER
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Jeff Com~chero, Mayor
By:
Name:
Title:
(Proper Notarization of SUBDIVIDEWs
signature is required and shall be
attached)
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
By:
William G. Hughes,
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
~personally known to me OR [] proved to me on the basis of satj~,actory evidence to be
the person(~,.)..whose name~ i~re subscribed to the
/--witl~n instrument and acknow~:lg~ed to me that
~i~e~3~Lthey. executed the,sam~e in <~er/their authorized
capacity(t~), and that b~r/their signature~gon the
instrument" the pe. rson~, or the entity upon behalf of
.~_~ _C.5~_..~F~""'^ ~ ..~3[ch the~son~act~d, e/y~ecu~ the instrument.
~ ( WITNESS my~"~and and o~cial sea~
OPTIONA~,..~.
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuab~'~o persons relying on the document and could
prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNED
[] INDIVIDUAL
[] CORPORATE OFFICER
TITLE(SI
[] LIMITED PARTNER(S)
[] GENERAL PARTNER(S)
[] A'I-rORNEY-IN-FACT
[] TRUSTEE(S)
[] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
[] OTHER:
DESCRIPTION OF A'I-rACHED DOCUMENT
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
NUMBER OF PAGES
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(lES)
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
VICINITY IVlAP
NO SCALE
SITE
ITEM 17
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR Of FINAN~
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 12, 2001
Acceptance of a Declaration of Dedication of an Easement for Date Street
Storm Drain
PREPARED BY: Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Jerry Alegria, Senior Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING A DECLARATION OF DEDICATION
OF STORM DRAIN EASEMENT ON THE SOUTH SIDE DATE
STREET AT A POINT 697 FEET EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD
BUT NOT ACCEPTING THIS EASEMENT INTO THE CITY
MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM AT THIS TIME
BACKGROUND: Lennar Homes of California, a California Corporation, has
submitted a Declaration of an easement for storm drain and maintenance purposes along the
South side of Date Street at a point 697.26 feet east of Margarita Road. The easement is
granted to facilitate the construction of the Margarita Road Storm Drain, Santa Gertrudis Valley
Assessment District 161 on the southerly half of Date Street by the developers of Tract 28184
(County of Riverside), located on the Nor/h side of Date Street. The easement will provide for
the outlet of the Margarita Road Storm Drain being constructed in Date Street.
Staff recommends that the City Council accept the easement, but not as part of the City
Maintained-Street System until the work is satisfactorily completed and recommended for
improvement acceptance and inclusion in the maintained system.
FISCALIMPACT:
None
1
R:\AGDRPT'~001\0612'~DateStreet Drain EsmtAccept.doc
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. 2001- , with Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B"
2. Location Map
3. Grant of Easement (On File)
2
R:~AGDRP'I'~2001\0612\DateStreet Drain EsmtAccept.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING A DECLARATION OF DEDICATION
OF STORPM DRAIN EASEMENT ON THE SOUTH SIDE DATE
STREET AT A POINT 697 FEET EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD
BUT NOT ACCEPTING THIS EASEMENT INTO THE CITY
MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM AT THIS TIME
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and
declare that:
A. County of Riverside Staff has established the requirement for the installation of
the Margarita Road Storm Drain on the Southerly half of Date Street, located within the
City of Temecula, as conditions of approval prior to recordation of Tract 28184;
B. As part of the construction of the required improvements it is necessary for the
developer, Lennar Homes of California, a California Corporation, to provide an easement, as
submitted to be recorded as an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication of Grant of Easement, for
drainage and maintenance purposes;
C. The developer, Lennar Homes of California, a California Corporation, has
submitted a Declaration of Dedication of an easement for drainage and maintenance purposes;
D. Acceptance of this grant of easement serves both the public and private interests
of the community.
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby desires to accept the
Declaration of Dedication of easement by Lennar Homes of California, a California Corporation,
for drainage and maintenance purposes as attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula
hereby accepts the Declaration of Dedication of easement as attached hereto as Exhibit "A", but
not into the City Maintained Street System at this time.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at
a regular meeting held on the 12t~ day of June, 2001.
ATTEST:
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
R:~AGD RPT~2001\0612\DateStreet DrainEsmtAccept.doc
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 12th day of June, 2001, by the following vote:
AYES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
0 COUNOILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
4
R:~AGDRP'r~2001\0612~DateStreet DrainEsmtAccept.doc
CONSENT TO RECORD (GOV. CODE 7050)
NO FEE (GOV. CODE 6103)
AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
1995 MARKET STREET, RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
Project: Santa Gertrudis Valley
Assessment District 161
Margarita Road Storm Drain
Project No.: 7-0-179
Drawing No.: 7-154
DECLARATION OF DEDICATION
LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA,
a Califomia Corporation,
Hereby Irrevocably Dedicates in Perpetuity to the City of Temecula, a municipal
corporation, an easement for the construction, use, repair, reconstruction,
inspection, operation and maintenance Margarita Road Storm Drain outlet and all
appurtenant works, including ingress and egress thereto, over that certain real
property situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, described in legal
description attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof.
/ /
Dated: ~J5._-:>J~c.) Lennar Homes of California,
a California corporation
Title: ~/ '-
(Notary)
Title: ........................................................................
(Notary)
~ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
State of California
County of Orange
On 8/30/00 before me, '
personally appeared Tomi?,Banks
SS.
J~nice L. Zlaket
[] personally known to me - OR - []
i~r~y~ tt xt:6xi~ x yo.~X ~l~gs~l ~ ~ ~xi~ Fan:g4 f~
o~id~s~exto be the person6s) whose name(a)
is~z subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/flmlthzy~executed
the same in his/kzvfXkzh' authorized
capacity(i~), and that by his~aexb'~ix
signatures~ on the instrument the personal
or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(~) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
OPTIONAL INFORMATION '
The information below is not required by law. However, it could prevent fraudulent attachment of this acknowl-
edgement to an unauthorized document.
CAPACITY cLAIMED BY SIGh'ER (PRINCIPAL)
[] INDIVIDUAL
[] CORPORATE OFFICER
[] PARTNER(S)
[] ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
[] TRUSTEE(S)
~ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
.... [] OTHER:
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
Declaration of Dedication
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
3
NUMBER OF PAGES
DATE OF DOCUMENT
OTHER
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S} OR
RIGHT THUMBPRINT
OF
SIGNER
APA 5/99 VALLEY-SIERRA, 800-362-3369
EXHIBIT A
EASEMENT LOT 161
BEING A PORTION OF LOT 161, OF THE MURRIETA PORTION OF THE TEMECULA
LAND AND WATER COMPANY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 8 OF MAPS, AT PAGE 359,
RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, ALSO BEING A PORTION OF SEC. 23, TTS, R3W,
PROJECTED, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 161;
THENCE; SOUTH 41 °46'54" EAST, 46.00 FEET ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF
SAID LOT 161 AND LOT 168 OF SAID MAP;
THENCE~ LEAVING SAID COMMON LINE SOUTH 10° 44'01" WE~T, 111.55 FEET;
THENCE; NORTH 79013'49'' WEST, 55.73 FEET;
THENCE; NORTH 41° 46'54" WEST, 69.64 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE
NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 161;
THENCE; NORTH 48013'06" EAST, 122.40 FEET, ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY
LINE, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED EASEMENT CONTAINS 0.23 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
H:~HOMl~l¢gals\Van Daele\OFFSITE SD & WL EASEMENTS TR 28184 LO.T 161 & 168 529015.doc
G7.O~
MARGARITA RD.
-- N42'50'35"W~ ~
EXHIBIT "B"
Trans-Pacific Consulfants
27431 Enterprise Circle West, 'Temeculo, CA., 92590
CIVIL ENGINEERS
LAND SURVEYORS,
THIS PLAT IS SOLELY AN AID IN LOCAllNO THE PARCEL(S) DESCRIBED IN ~HE
ATTACHED DOCUMENT. IT IS NOT PART OF I~IE WRITI~N DESCRIPTION I~EREIN,
SHEET 1 OF 1
~LANNERS
W.O. #
529015
SCALE: 1"= 100 J C, ra~ ~¥ J.O.E. OATE2/IO/O0 EXHIBIT FOr 'DRAINAGE/EASEMENT J
ITEM 18
APPROVAL ~ ~...~-~
CITY ATTORNEY ~ I
DIRECTOR Of FINAN~ ,
. CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 12, 2001
Acceptance of Grant of Easement for Date Street Right-of-Way
PREPARED BY: Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Jerry Alegria, Senior Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR
PUBLIC STREET AND ROADWAY PURPOSES ON THE
SOUTH SIDE DATE STREET BETWEEN MARGARITA ROAD
AND A POINT 697 FEET EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD BUT
NOT ACCEPTING THIS EASEMENT INTO THE CITY
MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM AT THIS TIME
BACKGROUND: Lennar Homes of California, a California Corporation, has
submitted an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication of Grant of Easement and right-of-way for public
street and roadway purposes along the South side of Date Street from Margarita Road to a
point 697.26 feet east of Margarita Road. The easement is granted to facilitate the construction
of a storm drain, utilities and a portion of the southerly half of Date Street by the developers of
Tract 28184 (County of Riverside), located on the North side of Date Street. The easement will
provide access to Tract 28184 and will be replaced with full width street improvements when
Tentative Tract 29639, the overall tract map for Harveston Specific Plan, is developed.
Staff recommends that the City Council accept the irrevocable offer of grant of easement, but
not as part of the City Maintained-Street System until the work is satisfactorily completed and
recommended for improvement acceptance and inclusion in the maintained system.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATrACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. 2001- , with Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B"
2. Location Map
3. Grant of Easement (On File)
1
R:~AGDRPT~.001\0612\DateSt reet RWAccept.doc 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR
PUBLIC STREET AND ROADWAY PURPOSES ON THE
SOUTH SIDE DATE STREET BETWEEN MARGARITA ROAD
AND A POINT 697 FEET EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD BUT
NOT ACCEPTING THIS EASEMENT INTO THE CITY
MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM AT THIS TIME
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and
declare that:
A. County of Riverside Staff has established the requirement for the improvement of
the Southerly half of Date Street, located within the City of Temecula, as conditions of
approval prior to recordation of Tract 28184;
B. As part of the construction of the required improvements it is necessary for the
developer, Lennar Homes of California, a California Corporation, to provide an easement, as
submitted to be recorded as an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication of Grant of Easement, for public
street and roadway, public utilities, and drainage purposes;
C. The developer, Lennar Homes of California, a California Corporation, has
submitted an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication of Grant of Easement for for public street and
roadway, public utilities, and drainage purposes;
D. Acceptance of this grant of easement serves both the public and private interests
of the community.
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby desires to accept the
Grant of Easement by Lennar Homes of California, a California Corporation, for public street
and roadway, public utilities, and drainage purposes as attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and
Exhibit "B".
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula
hereby accepts the Grant of Easement by Lennar Homes of California, a California Corporation,
for public street and roadway, public utilities, and drainage purposes, but not into the City
Maintained Street System at this time.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at
a regular meeting held on the 12t~ day of June, 2001.
A'i-I'EST:
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL)
2
R:\AG DRPT~-001\0612\DateSt reetRWAccept.doc2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 01- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 12th day of June, 2001, by the following vote:
AYES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
3
R:~AG DRPT'~.001\0612~DateStreet RWAccept.doc3
Recording requested by and when
Recorded, mail to:
City Clerk
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Exempt from Recording Fee per
Govt. Code Sec. 27383
City of Temecula
(Space above this line for Recorder's use)
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX IS NONE,
Public Agency exempt.
Revenue and Taxation Code Section 11922
RIGHT OF WA Y EASEMENT
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, LENNAR HOMES OF
CALIFORNIA, a California corporation, ("Grantor") hereby grants and conveys to the CITY OF
TEMECULA, a municipal corporation, ("Grantee") a perpetual easement and right of way for public street
and roadway purposes, including public utility and public service facilities over, under, upon, and across,
and within the real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of Califomia, described
as follows:
See Exhibit "A" attached
All as illustrated on the plat attached hereto and marked Exhibit "B" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this
instrument has been executed this 12ch day of .~une ,200~.
Lennar Homes of California,
a ~corporation
(Name)
o?
(Title)
By:
(Name)
(Title)
R:/yasinobk/habi[atforhumanity.rowdedication
, ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
State of California ] i
County of Orange -- SS
On 8 / 3 0 / 0 0 before me,
personally appeared Tom Banks
Janice L. Zlaket
[] personally known to me - OR - []
Comm. t 1228574
Orange Coumy
E4q~Sff. cYe to be the person(~) whose name(g)
irffa~z subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/~w'~:'e~y: executed
the same in his/~r~authorized
capacity(~ff'~, and that by
signatures(~ on the instrument the person(eft,
or the entity upon behalf of which the
personfff~ acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
OPTIONAL INFORMATION
The information below is not required by law. However, it could prevent fraudulent attachment of this acknowl-
edgement to an unauthorized document.
CAPACITY cLAIMED BY SIGNER (PRINCIPAL) DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
[] INDIVIDUAL
[] CORPORATE OFFICER Right of Way Easement
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
4
[] PARTNER(S)
[] ATtORNEY-IN-FACT NUMBER OF PAGES
[] TRUSTEE(S)
[] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR DATE OF DOCUMENT
[] OTHER: .....
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(lES)
OTHER
APA 5/99 VALLEY-SIERRA, 800-362-3369
EXHIBIT A
EASEMENT LOT 168
BEING A PORTION OF LOT 168, OF THE MURRIETA PORTION OF THE TEMECULA
LAND AND WATER COMPANY MAP ON FILE 1N BOOK 8 OF MAPS, AT PAGE 359,
RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY,.ALSO BEING A PORTION OF SEC. 23, T7S, R3W,
PROJECTED, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
.BEGINNING AT THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 168;
THENCE~
THENCE;
THENCE
THENCE
SOUTH 41°4~'54'' EAST, 46.00 FEET ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF
SAID LOT 168 AND LOT 161 OF SAID MAP;
LEAVING SAID COMMON LINE NORTH 48°13'06" EAST, 697.26 FEET
TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF MARGARITA ROAD
(110.00 FEET WIDE);
NORTH 42o50'35'' WEST, 46.01 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY
LINE TO A POINT ON TI-IE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 168;
SOUTH 48o13'06'' WEST, 696.41 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY
LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF.
THE ABOVE DESCIbdBED EASEMENT CONTAINS 0.74 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
H:~HOME\lcgals~Van Da¢Ie\OFFSITE SD & WL EASEMENTS TR 28184 LOT 161 &' 168 529015.doc
.~~ 67'
45
44
45
42
/
40
39
il
MARGARITA F~D. EXHIBIT "B"
N4-2'50'55"W-- -
'¢> ' · [;:::::1
N41'46'54"W --
SEC23,T7S,R3W
T~ans-Pacific ConsultanLs CIVIL ENGINEERS
27451 Enterprise Circle West, Temecule, CA., 92590 LAND SURVEYORS, PLANNERS
THIS PLAT IS SOLELY AN AID IN LOCA~NG THE PARCEL(S) DESCRIBED IN THE
ATTACHED DOCUMENT. IT IS NOT F.ART OF' THE WRITTEN DESCRIPTION THEREIN.
SCALE: 1"~ 100 I DRAWN BY J.O.E. DATE12/29/99 EXHIBIT
FOR
I w.o.#
SHEET 1 OF 1 529015
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
ITEM 19
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR Of FINANC~ /O~.~
CITY MANAGER
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 12, 2001
Acceptance of Offer of Dedication - Road Purposes on Western Bypass
Corridor and Front Street per Tentative Parcel Map No. 28627 Conditions
of Approval
PREPARED BY:
Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Clement M. Jimenez, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING AN OFFER OF DEDICATION OF
RIGHT OF WAY FOR ROAD PURPOSES FOR WESTERN
BYPASS CORRIDOR AND FRONT STREET AS REQUIRED BY
THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR PARCEL MAP NO.
28627, PA97-0307 BUT NOT ACCEPTING STREETS INTO THE
CITY MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM AT THIS TIME
BACKGROUND: On March 15, 2000 the City of Temecula Planning Commission approved
the final conditions of approval for Planning Application No. PA97-0307 for Tentative Parcel
Map No. 28627, a twelve parcel subdivision including one open space lot, consisting of 38
acres. The project applicant, Margarita Canyon, LLC, appealed two of the Conditions of
Approval relating to right of way dedications. Condition of Approval No. 27 required the
developer to dedicate an additional 12 feet of right of way, above and beyond the required 88
feet of right of way dedication for Western Bypass Corridor, to allow for a second left-turn pocket
into the proposed development within Parcel Map No. 28627. The City Council denied the
appeal and upheld the Planning Commission's approval for the dedication of an additional 12
feet of right of way on Western Bypass Corridor. Condition of Approval No. 27, together with
uncontested Condition of Approval No. 26, which required the developer to dedicate 88 feet of
right of way for Western Bypass Corridor and 78 feet of right of way for Front Street, is the basis
of this resolution.
I
R:\agdrpt\O 1\0522~TM28627.rowd edication
Subsequent to City Council approval of the conditions of approval, the Planning Director
approved Planning Application No. PA00-0310, a Phasing Map for Tentative Parcel Map No.
28627. The Phasing Map consists of four phases. The first phase, Parcel Map No. 28627-1,
consists of original Parcels 1 and 12. Western Bypass Corridor is located to the north of Parcel
1 and the extension of Front Street is located to the west. The proposed 88-foot and the
additional 12-foot Western Bypass Corridor right of ways are located within the northern portion
of Parcel 12 while, Front street is located to the east.
The exhibits for the right of way dedication reference Lot Line Adjustment PA 98-0331, which is
the most current recorded legal description of the underlying land. Parcel A of this lot line
adjustment, is contained within Tentative Parcel Map No. 28627-1.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. 2001-
2. Offer of Dedication-Road 15urposes (2 Sheets) with Exhibits "A", "B", "C', and "D"
2
R:\agdrpt\01\0522\TM28627.rowd edication
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING AN OFFER OF DEDICATION OF
RIGHT OF WAY FOR ROAD PURPOSES FOR WESTERN
BYPASS CORRIDOR AND FRONT STREET AS REQUIRED BY
THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR PARCEL MAP NO.
28627, PA97-0307 BUT NOT ACCEPTING STREETS INTO THE
CITY MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM AT THIS TIME
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and
declare that:
City Staff has established the requirement for dedication of right of way for street
improvements per Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map No. 28627,
PA97~0307, approved on May 9, 2000, as follows:
1. 88 feet of full width street right of way for Western Bypass Corridor
improvements
2. 78 feet of full width street right of way for Front Street improvements
12 feet of additional right of way for Western Bypass Corridor above and
beyond the proposed 88 feet of right of way to allow for a second left-turn
pocket into the proposed development on Tentative Parcel Map No. 28627-1;
The project applicant's appeal of Condition of Approval No. 27 was denied by the
City Council;
The developer submitted an offer of dedication for road purposes dedicating right
of way for public street and utility purposes for Western Bypass Corridor and
Front Street;
Acceptance of this offer of dedication does not obligate the City to assume
responsibility, nor incur liability with respect to the offer of dedication until the
subject streets have been accepted into the city maintained street system by
separate resolution.
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby desires to accept for
recordation the offer of dedication for road purposes by Great Western Mortgage as attached
hereto as Exhibit "A", Exhibit "B", Exhibit "C", Exhibit "D".
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula
hereby accepts for recordation the offer of dedication for road purposes by Great Western
Mortgage, for Western Bypass Corridor and Front Street, but not into the City Maintained Street
System at this time.
3
R:\agdrpt\01\0522\TM28627.rowdedication
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at
a regular meeting held on the 12~ day of June, 2001.
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 2001~ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 12th day of June, 2001 by the following vote:
AYES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
0 COUNClLMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
4
R:\agdrpt\01\0522\TM28627.rowdedication
EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY
City of Temecula
PER GOV'F CODE 6103
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
City of Temecula - City Clerk
P O Box 9033, 43200 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO
City of Tcmccula
P O Box 9033, 43200 Busincss Park Dr.
Tcmecula, CA 92589-9033
OFFER OF DEDICATION - ROAD PURPOSES
(Corporation)
The undersigned, being the present title owner(s) of record of the herein described parcel of land, do hereby make an
irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Temecula, a political subdivision of the State of California, and its successors
or assigns, for public street and utility purposes, the real property situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside,
State of California, described in Exhibits "A", "B", "C", and "D" attached hereto.
It is understood and agreed that the City of Temecula and its successors or assigns shall incur no liability with respect to
such offer of dedication, and shall not assume any responsibility for the offered parcel of land or any improvements thereon
or therein, until such offer has been accepted by appropriate action of the City Council, or of the local governing bodies or
its successors or assigns.
IN WI ,T~E.SS~THEREOF, these g.res~nts havre executed this instrument
this [ ~ day of~ 2001
STATE OF CALIFORNIA } SS.
The provisions hereof shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon heirs, successors, assigns, and personal
representatives of the respective parties hereto.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE}
On~~: ~)1 , before me the andersigned, , . ,~ ' ,
a N°ta~ Public-in and f~r the State °f Calif°mia, pers°nally appeared ~~ · ~ ,~](~x~(~k 0 fi~3~_~ personally
known to me (or proved to me on the basi~Lof satisfactory evidence)to be th..q.l~erson~whose na~e~r~r-e.-subscribed to the within
t~tnm~,.e, nt and acknowledged to me tha ti(.~e~l,~,tth~5, executed the same m{~[t~q~heir authorized capacity(i, gs')'f, and that by
.m~.~ner-g. heir signature.(,s0fin the instrument the person¢~, or the entity upon behalf of which the person.(~9'ffacted, executed the
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Office of the City Clerk
43200 Business Park Drive
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92590
CONSENT TO RECORDATION OF OFFER OF DEDICATION
This is to certify that the interests in real property, as set forth in the attached Offer of Dedication for
Road Purposes, dedicated to the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, is hereby accepted for
purposes of recordation by order of the City Council on June 12, 2001 with the understanding that
the City of Temecula shall incur no liability with respect to such offer of dedication, and shall not
assume any responsibility for the real property or any improvements thereon or therein until the City
Council has accepted these improvements into the City maintained street system by a separate
resolution.
City of Temecula
By:
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
ATTEST:
By:.
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
Forms~Acceptance Ced for Offer of Dedication
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR
ROAD EASEMENT
PARCEL"N'
THAT PORTION OF PARCEL "A" OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. PA98-0331, RECORDED
NOVEMBER 14, 2000 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 453433 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE MOST NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL "A";
THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL "A" SOUTH 48°19'13'' WEST, A
DISTANCE OF 40.01 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE
EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 461.00 FEET AND TO WHICH A RADIAL BEARS NORTH
83021 '12" WEST;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18°36'09'', AN ARC DISTANCE OF 149.68 FEET TO THE
SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL "A";
THENCE ALONG A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE SOUTH 78002'39'' WEST A DISTANCE OF
78.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY,
HAVING A RADIUS OF 539.00 FEET AND TO WHICH A RADIAL BEARS SOUTH 78002'39''
WEST;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18036'09'',
AN ARC DISTANCE OF 175.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 35001 '36" WEST ON A NON-TANGENT LINE, A DISTANCE OF 40.01 FEET
TO A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 756.00 FEET
AND TO WHICH A RADIAL BEARS NORTH 01°40'07'' EAST SAID CURVE BEING THE
NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL "A";
THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE THE FOLLOWING FOUR COURSES:
EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05°16'15'', AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 69.55 FEET;
SOUTH 15039'27'' EAST ON A NON-TANGENT LINE, A DISTANCE OF 6.44 FEET;
NORTH 59°39'01'' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 9.69 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-
TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 756.00 FEET AND TO
WHICH A RADIAL BEARS NORTH 07°42'41" EAST;
EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03°54'49'', AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 51.64 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS 0.368 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
SHEET 1 OF 2
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR
ROAD EASEMENT
PARCEL "B"
THAT PORTION OF PARCEL "A" OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. PA98-0331, RECORDED
NOVEMBER 14, 2000 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 453433 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL "A";
THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL "A" SOUTH 01°15'21'' EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 34.87 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 844.00 FEET AND TO WHICH A RADIAL BEARS
NORTH 01°15'21" WEST, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE, WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 5°59'53", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 88.35 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 82044'46'' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 92.27 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL "A";
THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE SOUTH 07°15'14'' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 88.00
FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH 82044'46'' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 92.27
FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, HAVING A
RADIUS OF 756.00 FEET;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 5059'53'', AN
ARC DISTANCE OF 79.14 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID EASTERLY LINE;
THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE NORTH 01°15'21'' WEST ON A NON-TANGENT
LINE, A DISTANCE OF 88.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS 0.356 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCELS ARE SUBJECT TO COVENANTS, CONDITIONS,
RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RIGHTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS, IF ANY,
OF RECORD.
SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO Al',
R.C.E. 20508
EXP. 9-30-01
iERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF.
SHEET 2 OF 2
EV'u'r 13 'r"r ii 13 it o' ~o'
AI-IZ D£ / D / P.o.s.
-.N .. ~,=3° 54 '49" /~AR~ SCALE: ! = 80
'~".~ R=756. O0 't,. //_N_j 1~__.37_L' 30" E._~R) .
"~'~ ~ L=51.64' '~.ff-----~.~. , -- '
--~'aal~ ~... ~ / \~r_ 'N B3· 21'
, , ~-- ~ 49.
R==7~56.00.'~"~ /~ 'X L~ ,-,.w- a~.~'~"'------
~N 0.~o L 69.55 \ / IA- '
/
~ ~ L~NE DATA
I
,// ~ N 350 Ol '36"N 40. Ol'
I / ~ N 15" 39'27"N 6.44'
I
/ ~ N 59~ 39'01"E 9.69'
I
/ ~ N Oi" ~5'2~"N(~ 88.00'
~ ~ ~ N 01°15'2t"W 34.87'
CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
THIS PLAT IS SOL~Y AN AID IN LOCATING T~ PARCEL(S) DESCRIBED IN THE
ATTACHED DO~ME~. IT IS NOT A PART OF T~ ~ITTEN DESCRIPTION THEREIN. SHEET 1 OF 1 W, O.
SCALE: 1" = 80' DRAWN BY:HAL DATE: JAN iggg SUBJECT: EXHIBIT FOR ROAD EASEMENT
TEMECULA
SITE
SANTA
t441~AR~TA
,qZVE~
,SOUTH
TO ESCONDT-DO
TEIvECUI_A
VICINITY MAP
EXHIBIT "C"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL "C"
THAT PORTION OF PARCEL "A" OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. PA98-0331, RECORDED
NOVEMBER 14, 2000 NOVEMBER 14, 2000 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 453433, OF RECORDS
OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL "A";
THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL "A" SOUTH 01°15'21'' EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 34.87 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 844.00 FEET AND TO WHICH A RADIAL BEARS
NORTH 01°15'21'' WEST;
THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 5059'53'', AN ARC DISTANCE OF 88.35 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 82°44'46'' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 92.27 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL "A";
THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH 07°15'14'' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2.86
FEET TO THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL "A";
THENCE ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL "A" NORTH 74°20'39"
EAST, A DISTANCE OF 186.11 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS 0.072 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
SEE EXHIBIT "D" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HERETO.
26003
SHEET 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT "D"
O' 80'
SCALE !' = 80'
/
CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
ATTACHED DOCUMENT. IT IS NOT A PART OF THE WRITTEN DESCRIPTION THEREIN. SHEET I OF 1 W.O.
SCALE: 1" = 80' BY: HAL DATE: ,.lAN t99! SUBJECT: LEi}AL DESCRIPTION
i60'
ITEM 20
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CitY ATTORNEY ~
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CiTY MANAGER __~LI
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 12, 2001
Acceptance of an Easement Deed for a Meandering Sidewalk along
North General Kearney Road with portions within Parcel E of Lot Line
Adjustment PA98-0054 located at the southeast corner of North General
Kearney Road and Margarita Road
PREPARED BY: .'~_ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
(~Clement M. Jimenez, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED
FOR A MEANDERING SIDEWALK ALONG NORTH
GENERAL KEARNEY ROAD WITH PORTIONS WITHIN
PARCEL E OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PA98-0054 AS
REQUIRED PER THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA00-0417
BACKGROUND: On April 4, 2001 the City of Temecula Planning Commission approved
Planning Application No. PA00-0417, the design, construction and operation of two medical
office buildings (Margarita Medical Plaza) and the associated Conditions of Approval. Per
Condition 40 of the Conditions of Approval, easements for sidewalks that meander through
private property shall be dedicated to the City and approved by the Department of Public Works,
the City Attorney, and the City Council. The easement deed is to secure public access,
construction and maintenance through private property. The alignment and location of the
portion of the meandering sidewalk easement shown on Exhibit "B", made part of the said
Easement Deed, is in general conformance with the development plan.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATrACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. 2001-
2. Easement Deed - Meandering Sidewalk with Exhibit "A" and "B" made parts thereof.
R:',agdrpt\01\0612~oarcel e of Ila pa98-0054.meanderingsidewalkeasementdedication
1
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED
FOR A MEANDERING SIDEWALK ALONG NORTH
GENERAL KEARNEY ROAD WITH PORTIONS WITHIN
PARCEL E OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PA98-0054 AS
REQUIRED PER THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA00-0417
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find,
determine and declare that:
City Staff has established the requirement for dedication of an easement for
sidewalks that meander through private property per Condition of Approval
No. 40 of the Conditions of Approval, PA00-0417, approved by the City of
Temecula Planning Commission on April 4, 2001;
The developer, Long Canyon Partners LP, a California Limited Partnership
submitted an easement deed which grants an easement for meandering
sidewalk including the construction and maintenance of the sidewalk;
C. Acceptance of the easement deed serves both the public and private
interests of the community.
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby desires to accept
the easement deed by Long Canyon Partners LP, a California Limited Partnership for
meandering sidewalk as described in Exhibit "A" and shown in Exhibit "B" attached hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Temecula hereby accepts the easement deed by Long Canyon Partners LP, a California Limited
Partnership for a meandering sidewalk.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of June, 2001.
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
A'Fr'EST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
R:~agdrpt\01\0612~arcel e of Ila pa98-0054.meanderingsidewalkeasementdedication
2
(SEAL)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 12thday of June, 2001 by the following vote:
AYES: 0
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
R:~agdrpt\01\0612~arcel e of Ila pa98-0054.meanderingsidewalkeasementdedication
3
EASEMENT DEED-MEANDERING SIDEWALK
FOK A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
Long Canyon Partners LP, a California Limited Partnership
GRANT(S) to the CITY OF TEMECULA, a political subdivision, an easement for meandering sidewalk, including
the construction and maintenance over, upon, across, and within real property in the City of Temecula, State of California,
described as:
See Attached Exhibit "A" For Complete Description
this / /k- dayof ~q .20~) / Print Narne and Title
a~..d. LL)ard~N°tary Public in ando/~ d~ ~/lf°r the State of California, personally appeared By
to be the pe~on~whose name~r~m~scfibed to the rAtiOn for SPT Holdings, LLC
on the inslxument the petson(~ or thc entity upon behalf of which the person0~acted,
WI'I3qESS my hand and offici~al seal ~ ~_ COMM. #122843~
x.~2CEPTANCE CERTIFICATE
By:
ATTEST:
CITY OF TEMECULA
JeffComerchero, Mayor
BY:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY:
Peter M. Thorsan, City Attorney
EXHIBIT"A"
CITY OF TEMECULA
PUBLIC SIDEWALK EASEMENT
Legal Description
That certain parcel of land situated in The City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State
of California, being that portion of Parcel "E" of Lot Line Adjustment No. PA 98-0054
recorded April 9, 1998 as Instrument No. 137810 of Official Records of Riverside
County, California, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the northeast comer of said Parcel "E", being a point on the
southerly Right-of-Way line of North General Kearny Road, also being a point on a
1244.00 foot radius curve concave northerly, a radial line to said point bears South
01o30'35" West;
Thence, westerly along said southerly Right-of-way line and along the arc of said
1244.00 foot radius curve through a central angle of 02°15'07" an arc distance of 48.90
feet to a point being the beginning of a non-tangent 77.00 foot radius curve concave
northerly a radial line to said curve bears South 26°31'50" East, said point also being the
True point of beginning:
Thence, leaving said Right-of-Way line and said 1244.00 foot radius curve, westerly
alpng the arc of said 77.00 foot radius curve through a central angle of 55o47'55" an arc
distance of 74.99 feet to a point being the beginning of a 43.00 foot radius reverse curve
concave southerly;
Thence, continuing westerly along the arc of said 43.00 foot radius reverse curve
through a central angle of 46°13'49" an arc distance of 34.70 foot to the beginning of a
77.00 foot radius reverse curve concave northerly;
Thence, continuing westerly along the arc of said 77.00 foot radius reverse curve
through a central angle of 61°34'06'' an arc distance of 82.74 foot to a point on said
southerly Right-of-Way line of North General Kearny Road, a radial line to said point
bears South 44036'22'' West;
Thence, easterly along said Right-of-Way line South 80029'27" East a distance of 59.06
foot to a point being the beginning of a 1244.00 foot radius tangent curve concave
northerly;
Thence, continuing easterly along said Right-of-Way line and along said 1244.00 foot
radius curve through a central angle of 05044'50.' an arc distance of 124.78 feet to the
True point of beginning.
EXHIBIT
I
/
175.76'
~,1 ·
IV. C£N£RAL ~(£ARN¥ RO. J I
I
C1
/
/
C4'
EASEMENT FOR
MEANDERING
SIDEWALK
PA~,C,-'.L E
INST, NO, 137810, (REC, 4/9/98)
A.P.N. 921-900-076
SCALE: 1"=100'
PAnC...L'-~ F D
24.29'
DATA TABLE
BRG./DELTA RADIUS LENGTH
L1 ~ N80'29'27"W - - 79,50'
L2 N55'25'59"E -- 32,00'
L3 $80'29'27"E -- 59,06'
C1 07'59'58" 1244.00' 173.68'
C2 02'15'07" 1244.00' 48.90"
C3 05'44'50" 1244.00' 124.78'
C4 55'47'55" 77.00' 74.99'
C5 46'~ 3'49" 4,:3.00' 34.70'
C6 61'34'06" 77.00' 82.74'
ITEM 21
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN(
CITY MANAGER
City Manager/City Council
~j~William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 12, 2001
Reimbursement Agreements with MS Temecula II, LLC - Dendy Parkway
Improvements and Diaz Road Traffic Signal Installation
PREPARED BY:
Beryl Yasinosky, Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Execute an Agreement between the City and MS Temecula II, LLC for Reimbursement
of the Cost of Constructing Improvements within Dendy Parkway
2. Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT
ENTITLED "AGREEMENT FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS
OF CONSTRUCTION FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS (DENDY
PARKWAY) BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND MS
TEMECULA II, LLC (PA 2000-0355)
Execute an Agreement between the City and MS Temecula II, LLC for Reimbursement
of the Cost of Installing a Traffic Signal at Winchester and Diaz Roads.
4. Adopt a Resolution Entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT
ENTITLED "REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR
WINCHESTER ROAD/DIAZ ROAD TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS
BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND MS TEMECULA, LLC
BACKGROUND: On November 15, 2000, the City Council approved Planning
Application 2000-0335 for the design, construction and operation of a 410,000 square foot
industrial building located at the southwest corner of the extension of Dendy Parkway and the
extension of Winchester Road, in the Westside Business Center Industrial Park. Developed by
MS Temecula II, LLC, the site represents the future home of the Scott's Manufacturing Facility.
R:~agdrpt\01\0612\MSTernecula. Reimbursmentagrmts
1
Pursuant to the conditions of approval for the project, the developer is required to complete
certain off-site improvements, which include the construction of half-width improvements within
Dendy Parkway from the Scott's project boundary to the existing roadway improvements
adjacent to Milgard Manufacturing, and the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of
Winchester and Diaz Roads. In return, MS Temecula, LLC is eligible for reimbursement of a
portion of the costs associated with the improvements, as follows:
Dendy Parkway Improvements
In accordance with the terms of the attached Reimbursement Agreement for the Dendy
Parkway improvements, Milgard Manufacturing shall be conditioned to pay for the cost of the
roadway improvements defined in this Agreement upon application to the City for any
development permits. In return, the City shall reimburse MS Temecula II, LLC the monies it
collects from Milgard.
Preliminary construction cost estimates for the Dendy Parkway improvements in the amount of
$134,006.00 have been reviewed and approved by staff. The final reimbursement amount will
be determined upon completion of the improvements and acceptance by the City Council.
Traffic Siqnal Improvements
In accordance with the terms of the attached Reimbursement Agreement for the Traffic Signal
Improvements at Winchester and Diaz Roads, MS Temecula II, LLC is required to install a traffic
signal at this location prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
Preliminary construction costs for the signal improvements in the amount of $173,961.00 have
been reviewed and approved by staff. The developer is eligible to receive DIF credits in the
amount of $43,252.88 for the Traffic Signal and Traffic Control Systems component of the
Public Facilities Development Impact Fees and reimbursement from the City to obtain 100% of
the ultimate cost for design and installation. The final reimbursement amount will be determined
upon completion of the improvements and acceptance by City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT: There are no anticipated fiscal impacts associated with approval
of Reimbursement Agreement for the Dendy Parkway Improvements. The City agrees to
collect certain funds equal to the cost of the roadway improvements from Milgard Manufacturing
at the time a development permit is requested. The City agrees to reimburse said funds
collected from Milgard Manufacturing to MS Temecula II, LLC.
With respect to the traffic signal at Winchester and Diaz Roads, the City has agreed to
reimburse MS Temecula II, LLC for 100% cost of the improvements. MS Temecula II, LLC will
contribute their fair share of $43,252.86 (Traffic Signal component of DIF) towards the estimated
construction cost of $173,961.00. Upon completion and acceptance of the improvements, MS
Temecula II, LLC is entitled to receive a reimbursement from the City of approximately
$130,708.14. Adequate funds have been included in the FY 2001/02 Capital Improvement
Project budget for the anticipated reimbursement amount.
ATTACHMENTS:
2.
3.
4.
Resolution/Dendy Parkway Reimbursement Agreement
Exhibit A - Reimbursement AgreementJDendy Parkway
Resolution/Traffic Signal Reimbursement Agreement
Exhibit A - Reimbursement Agreement/Traffic Signal
R:\agdrpt\01\0612\MSTemecula. Reirn bursmentagrmts
2
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT
ENTITLED "AGREEMENT FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS
OF CONSTRUCTION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS (DENDY
PARKWAY) BETVVEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND MS
TEMECULA II LLC (PA 2000-0355)"
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY RESOLVES AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find,
determine and declare that:
a. MS Temecula II, LLC ("Developer") is the owner of approximately 31
acres of real property located east of Winchester Road between Dendy Parkway and
Remington Avenue, Temecula California.
b. On November 15, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula adopted Resolution No. 2000-034 approving Planning Application No. 2000-0335 (the
"Project").
c. Condition 41 b. and c. of the Resolution provides that prior to issuance of
building permits, the Developer is required to construct certain public works improvements
consisting of the construction of curb, gutter, sidewalk, and one half of Dendy Parkway as
described in the Agreement ("Improvements"). The Improvements are necessary for the
development of Project.
d. Developer and City estimate that the cost of the Improvements should be
one hundred thirty-four thousand, six dollars ($134,006.00) but the parties recognize that
economic conditions at the time of bidding and construction conditions could alter the accuracy
of the estimate.
e. Developer has offered to construct the Improvements provided Developer
is reimbursed by the owners of other property which benefits from the Improvements in their fair
share of contribution, to the extent provided in the Agreement.
f. The property which is benefited by the Improvements is the Milgard
Property located at the southwest corner of Diaz Road and Dendy Parkway, Temecula,
California. The owners of this property were notified of the date and time of the meeting at
which the Council would consider the approval of the Agreement and were notified of their right
to address the Council on the Agreement. This notice was sent by mail and delivered
telephonically to a representative of the owner of the property not less than ten (10) calendar
days prior to the Council's consideration of the Agreement.
Section 2. The City Council hereby approved that certain agreement entitled
"Agreement for Reimbursement of Costs of Construction Public Improvements (Dendy Parkway)
Between City of Temecula and Ms Temecula II, LLC (PA 2000-0335)" and authorizes the Mayor
to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City in substantially the form attached hereto as
Exhibit A.
Section 3.
matter required by law.
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution in the
R:\agdrpt\01\0612\MSTemecula. Reim bursmentagrmts
3
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 12th day of June, 2001.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify
that Resolution No. 2001-__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City
of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on this 12th day of June, 2001, by the following
vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS: 0
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS: 0
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 0
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
R:\agdrpt\01\0612\MSTemecula. Reimbursmentagrmts
4
EXHIBIT A
DENDY PARKWAY
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT FOR PARTIAL REIMBURSEMENT OF
COSTS OF CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS (DENDY PARKWAY) BETWEEN CITY OF
TEMECULA AND MS TEMECULA II, LLC (PA 2000-0335)
THIS REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT is entered into and effective as of
June 12, 2001 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City"), and MS
Temecula II LLC ("Developer"). In consideration of the mutual promises and benefits described
herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Recitals. This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and
purposes, which each of the parties hereto acknowledge and agree are true and correct:
1.1 Developer is the owner of approximately 31 acres of real property
generally located east of Winchester Road between Dendy Parkway and Remington
Avenue, Temecula Califomia ("Property") which is legally described on Exhibit A,
attached hereto.
1.2 On November 15, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula adopted Resolution No. 2000-034 ("Resolution") approving Planning
Application No. 00-0335 (the "Project").
1.3 Condition 41 b. and c. of the Resolution provides that prior to
issuance of building permits, the Developer is required to construct certain off-site public
improvements ("Improvements") which are more particularly described in Exhibit B,
attached hereto, and Improvement Plan No. 19-99-001C0.
1.4 In order to secure Developer's obligation to construct the
Improvements, the City and Developer entered into that certain Subdivision Improvement
Agreement dated November 3, 2000.
1.5 One of the requied Improvements is the improvement of Dendy
Parkway ("Dendy Parkway improvements"). The Dendy Parkway Improvements are to
be constructed adjacent to the Property and adjacent to the property which is legally
described on Exhibit C., attached herto ("Milgard Property"). The Dendy Parkway
Improvements benefit both the Property and the Milgard Property. The portion of the
Dendy Parkway Improvements adjacent to the Milgard Property are also shown on
Exhibit C.
1.6 Developer and City estimate that the portion of the costs of the
Dendy Parkway Improvements that are in excess of the improvements required for the
Property and are for the benefit of the Milgard Property should be approximately One
Hundred Thirty Four Thousand Six Dollars ($134,006.00), as more particularly shown on
636607,3
May 22,2001
-1-
Exhibit B., but recognize that economic conditions at the time of bidding and
construction conditions could alter the accuracy of the estimate.
1.7 Developer has offered to construct the Dendy Parkway
Improvements which are in excess of the improvements required for the Developer's
subdivision, provided Developer is reimbursed by the City for its fair share of the costs of
the Dendy Parkway Improvements allocable to the Milgard Property, to the extent
provided in this Agreement.
1.8 The parties now desire to set forth the terms of the reimbursement
to Developer of a fair share portion of the costs of the Dendy Parkway Improvements that
are allocable to the Milgard Property.
1.9 This Agreement is being entered into pursuant to the authority set
forth in Government Code Section 66405 et seq. and all applicable laws, regulations and
local ordinances.
2. Construction of Public Improvements. Developer shall construct and
install the Improvements in accordance with the Subdivision Improvement Agreement.
3. Reimbursement of Costs of Construction. Upon the earlier of the
acceptance of the Dendy Parkway Improvements by the City Council in accordance with the
terms of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement or the opening of the Dendy Parkway
Improvements for public use, Developer shall submit to the Director of Public Works the actual
costs of installing the Dendy Parkway Improvements, which costs may include, but are not
limited to reasonable and customary costs for design, administration, and overhead, construction
costs, and related costs of plan check, inspection, permit, fees, bonds and engineering (the
"Reimbursable Costs") and all invoices and other documentation as reasonably required by the
Director which support the Reimbursable Costs actually incurred. City shall reimburse
Developer for the Reimbursable Costs as provided in this Agreement.
3.1 For a period of fifteen (15) years following the date of this
Agreement, City agrees to impose as a condition of development, to the extent lawful and
within its municipal powers, including Government Code Sections 66405 et seq. on the
Milgard Properly or any portion thereof, as identified on Exhibit C, a condition requiring
payment by the owner(s) of the Milgard Property of the Milgard Property's fair share of
the Reimbursable Costs. The City believes that it has the authority to impose this
condition pursuant to, among other authority, Government Code Sections 66485-66487.
3.2 Simple interest shall accrue from the date the Reimbursable Costs
are incurred by the Developer on the outstanding balance of the Reimbursable Costs at
eight percent (8%) per year until the Developer is reimbursed as provided in this
Agreement.
636607.3
May 22, 2001
-2-
3.3 Within fifteen (15) business days of receipt by the City of any
funds from the owner(s) of the Milgard Property pursuant to the conditions as described
in Section 3.1, City shall pay such amount to the Developer at the address specified in
Section 4 of this Agreement. It is the Developer's obligation to keep the City informed
of its current address.
3.4 In the event the Milgard Property does not receive a development
approval within fifteen (15) years of the date of this Agreement or the conditions of
development requiring payment of the Reimbursable Costs are found to be invalid by a
court of competent jurisdiction, or the City, after good faith efforts, is otherwise unable to
recover all or a portion of such Reimbursable Costs, City shall have no obligation to pay
Developer the Reimbursable Costs. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein,
City agrees to use good faith efforts to impose the conditions of development as set forth
in Section 3.1 and collect the Reimbursable Costs from the owner(s) of the Milgard
Property.
3.5 In the event a legal action is filed challenging the validity of the
conditions of development imposed by the City as set forth in Section 3.1 Developer and
City shall meet and in good faith attempt to develop a strategy for settling the litigation
and modi lying this Agreement in order to equitably accommodate the interest of all
parties. In the event such an effort does not resolve the litigation or the parties are unable
to agree upon a modification of this Agreement, Developer may request the City to
defend the litigation. The Developer shall deposit with the City an amount reasonably
determined by the City to cover the estimated costs of the defense of the litigation. The
City shall have no obligation to defend the litigation until such time as such amount is
deposited with the City. The deposit maybe in the form of a deposit in an interest
beating account with the principle payable to the City pursuant to this Agreement and the
interest on such account payable to the Developer. In the event that during the course of
the litigation the City determines that the estimated costs of the litigation will exceed the
amount on deposit, the City may require an additional deposit in order to proceed with
the defense of the litigation. In defending the litigation, the City and its attorneys shall
consult with Developer and keep the Developer fully apprised of the status of the
litigation and the on-going costs of the litigation and provide an accounting regarding the
use of the deposit. The Developer may terminate the defense of the litigation at any time
upon written notice to the City. The City shall deduct from the Deposit the reasonable
legal fees and litigation expenses incurred by the City in defending the litigation and any
monetary awards to the plaintiffs or petitioners which may be imposed by the court, such
as, but not limited to an award of attorney fees.
4. Notice. Any payments of the Reimbursable Costs or notices which
either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and
may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery
service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time.
of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return
636607.3
May 22, 2001
-3-
receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address
as that party may later designate by Notice:
To City:
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Attention: Director of Finance
To Developer:
MS Temecula II, LLC
Attention: David Simon
1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Phone (310) 788-2200
With Copies to:
Kearney Real Estate Company
Attention: John Bragg
4275 Executive Square, Suite 800
La Jolla, CA 92037
Phone (858) 546-2930
5. Assignment. This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit
of the parties and their heirs, successors, and assigns of the Parties. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, any reimbursement rights hereunder shall remain with Developer unless Developer
specifically assigns those rights to a successor by a written assignment delivered to the City.
Developer may assign its rights and transfer it obligations under this Agreement only with the
City's prior written consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, provided
however that City consent shall not be required for an assignment to a subsidiary or affiliate of
Developer or any entity that is an assignee of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement.
Immediately upon the granting of such consent and the City's receipt of a duly executed
assignment and assumption agreement by Developer and Assignee in accordance with the
requirements of this Agreement, Developer shall be released from all liability and obligations
hereunder.
6. Integration of Agreement Terms. Except for the Subdivision
Improvement Agreement, this Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties
relating to the obligations of the parties relating to the reimbursement of the Reimbursable Costs.
All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral
or written, relating to the reimbursement for the costs of the Improvements are merged into this
Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect for the Subdivision Improvement
Agreement.
636607,3
May 22, 2001
-4-
7. Independent Investigation. Each party is entering into this Agreement
based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent
investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
8. Indemnification. Each party shall indemnify, protect and hold
harmless the other party, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any
and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature,
including but not limited to reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs, which the indemnified
party, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon
them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of other party's
negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of
this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the indemnified party's own negligence or
wrongful conduct.
9. Applicable Law/Venue. The City and Developer understand and agree
that thc laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of
the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any
litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal
district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event litigation is
filed with respect to this Agreement the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney
fees and litigation expenses as the court may determine.
10. Authority to Execute Agreement. The person or persons executing this
Agreement on behalf of Developer warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to
execute this Agreement on behalf of the Developer and has the authority to bind Developer to the
performance of its obligations hereunder.
11. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of
counterparts, ~ach of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original
and all of which counterparts taken together shall constitute but one and the same instrument.
12. Modification. No modification, waiver or discharge of this Agreement
shall be valid unless the same is in writing and signed by the party against which the
enforcement of such modification, waiver or discharge is or may be sought.
13. Further Assurances. Each party shall tall all actions reasonably
necessary to implement the terms of this Agreement.
14. Exhibits. The following exhibits are attached to this Agreement and
each is incorporated into this Agreement as though set forth in full:
Exhibit A. Legal Description of Developer's Property
636607.3
May 22, 2001
Exhibit B.
Public Improvements to Be Constructed by
Developer/Construction Cost Estimate
-5-
Exhibit C Property Benefited by Public Improvements to Be
Constructed by Developer (Milgard Property)
IIIII
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Jeff Comemhero
Mayor
Attest:
Susan Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
636607.3
May 22, 200l
-6-
DEVELOPER
MS TEMECULA II, LLC, a Delaware Limited
Liability Company
By:
Name:
Title:
By:
Name:
Title:
6366O7.3
May 22, 2001
-7-
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPER'S PROPERTY
636607.3
May 22,2001
-8-
EXHIBIT B
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY DEVELOPER/
CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
636607.3
May 22, 2001
-9-
EXHIBIT B
SCOTTS MANUFACTURING
OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT BUDGET
KEETON CONSTRUCTION
18-Dec-00
Earthwork Move-in
Clear and Grub Site
Saw Cut Temporary Cul-de-Sac
Die-Assemble
Asphalt Demolition
Asphalt Load & Haul
Grade & Balance
Export Excess Subgrade
Finish Steel Grade
Cut Curb Grade
Cut Sidewalk Grade
Cut Sidewalk Grade - Remmington
Construction Water
Asphalt Paving
.45' Asphalt on .67 Base
Increase Section to 13.5~ Base
Increase Section to 12~ Base
Concrete
Curb & Gutter
Sidewalk (Winchester & Dendy)
Sidewalk (Remmington)
Access Ramp
Scotts
1,500
2,000
9,500
1,600
8,500
4,500
7,000
6,000
1,000
41,500
164,000
4,496
19,893
188,389
16,000
19,800
15,500
600
52,000
Mileard
500
5O0
850
5O0
2,500
1,250
3,000
1,500
3,500
1,500
2,400
18,000
44,500
8,280
52,780
4,500
6,000
10,500
Striping and Signs
4,O00
508
Barricades
5,O00
Dry Utilities
Utility Increase
125,000
31,183
33,000
6,960
Staking
6,500
2,000
General Conditions
13,700
4,000
Liability Insurance
0.80o/0
3,869
1,058
Subtotal
Fee
Subtotal
Bond
3.50%
471,141
16~490
487,631
2~5O0
490,131
128,798
4,508
133,306
7O0
134,006
TOTAL CONTRACT $ 624,137
EXHIBIT C
PROPERTYBENE~TTEDBYPUBLICIMPROVEMENTS
TO BECONSTRUCTEDBYDEVELOPER
(MILGARDPROPERTY)
636607.3
May 22, 2001
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT
ENTITLED "REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR
WINCHESTER ROAD/DIAZ ROAD TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS
BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND MS TEMECULA II, LLC"
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY RESOLVES AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find,
determine and declare that:
a. MS Temecula II, LLC ("Developer") is the owner of approximately
31 acres real property located east of Winchester Road between Dendy Parkway and
Remington Avenue, Temecula California.
b. On November 15, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula adopted Resolution No. 2000-034 approving Planning Application No. 2000-
0335 (the "Project").
c. Condition 45 of the Resolution provides that prior to issuance of
the certificate of occupancy, the Developer is required to construct certain public works
improvements consisting of the construction and installation of traffic signals at the
intersection of Winchester Road and Diaz Road as described in the Agreement
("Improvements"). The Improvements are necessary for the development of Project.
d. City and Developer have studied the nature of the Improvements
and the contribution of the Project to the need for the Improvements. City and
Developer have negotiated Developer's fair share contribution to the construction of the
Improvements. As a result of these negotiations, City and Developer have concluded
that Developer's fair share of the cost of constructing the Improvements shall be forty
three thousand two hundred fifty two dollars and 86/100 ($43,252.86). Developer's fair
share amount is the Traffic Signal Component of the City's Development Impact Fee for
the Project. Developer and City each acknowledge and agree that the Project contains
four hundred eleven thousand nine hundred thirty two square feet (411,932) of building
area. The parties further agree that the Traffic Signal Component of the DIF for the
Project is the building area multiplied by $.105, the Traffic Signal Component rate, for a
total of $43,252.86.
e. Developer and City estimate that the cost of the Improvements
should be one hundred seventy three thousand, nine hundred sixty one dollars
($173,961.00) but recognize that economic conditions at the time of bidding and
construction conditions could alter the accuracy of the estimate.
f. Developer has offered to construct the Improvements provided
Developer is reimbursed by the City for its share of the Improvements. It is
uneconomical and impractical for the City to bid the Improvement work separately from
the development and other improvement work being undertaken by Developer in the
area due to conflict between contractors and disruptions to traffic flow due to
uncoordinated construction activities.
R:~agdrpt\01\0612\MSTemecula. Reimbursmentagrmts
5
Section 2. The City Council hereby approved that certain agreement entitled
"Reimbursement Agreement For Winchester/Diaz Road Traffic Improvements Between City of
Temecula And Ms Temecula II, LLC" and authorizes the Mayor to execute the Agreement on
behalf of the City in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Section 3.
matter required by law.
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution in the
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this
12th day of June, 2001.
ATTEST:
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify
that Resolution No. 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on this 12th day of June, 2001, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: 0
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
R:\agd rpt\O1\0612\MSTemecula.Reimbursmentagrmts
6
EXHIBIT A
WINCHESTER/DIAZ ROAD TRAFFIC SIGNAL
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR WINCHESTER
ROAD/DIAZ ROAD TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN
THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND MS TEMECULA II, LLC
THIS REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT is entered into and effective as of
June 12, 2001 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City"), and MS
Temecula II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Developer"). In consideration of the
mutual promises and benefits described herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Recitals. This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts
and purposes, which each of the parties hereto agree are true and correct:
1.1 Developer is the owner of approximately 31 acres of real property
located east of Winchester Road between Dendy Parkway and'Remington Avenue,
Temecula California, which is legally described on Exhibit A, Legal Description of
Developer's Property.
1.2 On November 15, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula adopted Resolution No. 2000-034 approving Planning Application No. 2000-
035 (the "Project").
1.3 Condition 45 of the Resolution provides that prior to issuance of
the certificate of occupancy, the Developer is required to construct traffic signal
improvements at the intersection of Diaz Road and Winchester road which are described
in Exhibit B, Traffic Signal Improvements/Construction Cost Estimate (hereafter
"Improvements"). The Improvements are necessary for the development of Project.
1.4 City and Developer have studied the nature of the Improvements
and the contribution of the Project to the need for the Improvements. City and Developer
have negotiated Developer's fair share contribution to the construction of the
Improvements. As a result of these negotiations, City and Developer have concluded that
Developer's fair share of the cost of constructing the Improvements shall be forty-three
thousand, two hundred fifty-two dollars and 86/100 ($43,252.86). Developer's fair share
amount is the Traffic Signal Component of the City's Development Impact Fee for the
Project. Developer and City each acknowledge and agree that the Project contains four
hundred eleven thousand, nine hundred thirty-two square feet of building area. The
parties fi~rther agree that the Traffic Signal Component of the DIF for the Project is the
building area multiplied by $. 105, the Traffic Signal Component rate, for a total of
$43,252.86. Developer will receive a credit against the DIF for the Project in the amount
of $43,252.86.
1.5 Developer and City estimate that the cost of the Improvements
should be one hundred seventy-three thousand, nine hundred sixtyr(~ne dollars
636611,3
May 31,200~
-1-
($173,961.00), but the parties recognize that economic conditions at the time of bidding
and construction conditions could alter the accuracy of the estimate.
1.6 Developer is ready to begin construction of the Project. It is
uneconomical and impractical for the City to bid the Improvement work separately from
the development and other improvement work being undertaken by Developer in the area
due to conflict between contractors and disruptions to traffic flow due to uncoordinated
construction activities.
1.7 The parties now desire to set forth the terms of the City's
reimbursement of the costs of a portion of the Improvements.
2. Construction of Improvements. Developer shall construct and install
the Improvements in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the Director of
Public Works (the "Director") and subject to the terms of this Agreement.
3. Allocation of Costs of Improvements. City shall pay to Developer a
sum equal to the actual costs of constructing and installing the Improvements, less the
Developer's share of forty three thousand two hundred fifty two dollars and 86/100 ($43,252.86)
as described in Section 1.4. The parties have each independently determined that this figure
reasonably apportions the responsibility of City and Developer for the costs of the Improvements
given the Developer's obligation to construct certain improvements pursuant to Condition 45 of
Planning Application No. 2000-0335.
4. Payment of Reimbursable Costs. Upon acceptance of the
Improvements by the City Council, Developer shall submit to the Director of Public Works the
actual cost of installing the Improvements and all invoices and other documentation as
reasonably required by the Director which supports the costs actually incurred. The Director
shall calculate the costs for which the Owner shall be reimbursed based upon the allocation
described in Section 3, above (the "Reimbursement Costs"). City shall pay to Developer the
Reimbursable Costs within twenty working days of acceptance of the Improvements.
5. City Obligations. In order to implement the construction of the
Improvements pursuant to this Agreement, City shall:
5.1 Review and approve design of the Improvements.
5.2 Obtain possession of all necessary rights of way necessary for the
construction of the Improvements.
5.3 Obtain all necessary permits for the Improvements fi-om the
applicable public agencies.
5.4 City shall be responsible for the payment of permit fees and City
inspections of the construction o£the Improvements.
May31,2001
-2-
5.5 Designate a representative of the City to regularly meet with the
representatives of Developer and Developer's contractor to coordinate construction
activities and monitor progress of construction.
6. Developer Obligations.
Improvements, Developer shall:
In order to coordinate the construction of the
6.1 Construct and install the Improvements in accordance with the
plans and specifications approved by the Director of Public Works;
6.2 Obtain the bids of not less than three qualified bidders, as approved
by the Director of Public Works in advance of bidding, and award the construction
contract to the lowest bidder.
6.3 Require the contractor to pay prevailing wages for the work in
accordance with Labor Code Section 1770 et seq. and applicable regulations of the State
Labor Commissioner.
6.4 Supervise and manage the construction of the Improvements.
6.5 Designate a representative of the Developer to regularly meet with
the representatives of the City and Developer's contractor to coordinate construction
activities and monitor progress of construction.
6.6 Developer and Developer's contractors shall procure and maintain
insurance in the amounts and types set forth on Exhibit C, Insurance Requirements.
6.7 Prepare and maintain all books, records, reports and
correspondence to or from contractors, subcontractors and other persons relating to the
construction and installation of the Improvements reasonably necessary to document the
costs incurred in constructing the Improvements. Developer shall permit representatives
of the City to review and copy all books, records, reports and correspondence to or from,
or prepared by, contractors, subcontractors and other persons relating to the construction
and installation of the Improvements or which document the costs incurred in
constructing the Improvements on two (2) business day's notice to Developer. Developer
shall keep such records for a period of four (4) years from the date of acceptance of the
Improvements.
7. Notices. Any payments or notices which either party may desire to
give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i)
personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited
to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in
the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the
address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by
Notice:
636611.3
May31,2001
-3-
To City:
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Attention: Director of Public Works
To Developer:
MS Temecula II, LLC
Attention: David Simon
1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Phone (310) 788-2200
With Copies to:
Kearney Real Estate Company
Attention John Bragg
4275 Executive Square, Suite 800
La Jolla, CA 92037
Phone (858) 546-2930
8. Applicable Law. The City and Developer understand and agree that
the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the
parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement.
9. Litigation. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place
in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of
Temecula. In the event litigation is file by one or more of the parties to this Agreement, the
prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney fees and
litigation expenses as determined by the Court.
10. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties relating to apportionment and
reimbursement of the costs of the Improvements. All prior or contemporaneous agreements,
understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, relating to the reimbursement for
the costs of the Improvements are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or
effect except for the Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Parcel Map No. 29895 between
the City and Developer.
11. Independent Investigation. Each party is entering into this Agreement
based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent
investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
12. Indemnification. Each party shall indemnify, protect and hold
harmless the other party, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any
and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature,
636611.3
May 3 I, 2001
-4-
including but not limited to reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs, which the indemnified
party, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon
them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of other party's
negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of
this Agreement, excepting only liability to the extent arising out of the indemnified party's own
negligence or wrongful conduct.
13 Authority to Execute Agreement. The person or persons executing this
Agreement on behalf of Developer and City each warrants and represents that he or she has the
authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Developer or City, as applicable, and has
the authority to bind Developer or City, as applicable, to the performance of its obligations
hereunder.
14. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original
and all of which counterparts taken together shall constitute but one and the same instrument.
15. Modification. No modification, waiver or discharge of this Agreement
shall be valid unless the same is in writing and signed by the party against which the
enfomement of such modification, waiver or discharge is or may be sought.
16. Further Assurances. Each party shall take all actions reasonably
necessary to implement the terms of this Agreement.
17. Exhibits. The following exhibits are attached to this Agreement and
each is incorporated into this Agreement as though set forth in full:
Exhibit A. Legal Description of Developer's Property
Exhibit B. Traffic Signal Improvements/Construction Cost Estimate
Exhibit C Insurance Requirements
636611.3
May 3 I, 2001
-5-
1N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Jeff Comerchero
Mayor
Attest:
Susan Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
DEVELOPER
MS TEMECULA II, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company
By:
Name:
Title:
By:
Name:
Title:
636611.3
May 3 I, 2001
-6-
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPER'S PROPERTY
May 22,200!
EXHIBIT B
TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS/CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
636611.3
May 22, 2001
EXHIBIT B
Traffic Signal Improvements / Construction Cost Estimate
Winchester and Diaz
Hard Costs
0614-00100
0614-00110
0614-00650
0614-01310
0614-02580
0614-02810
0614-02810
0614-02810
0614-$0000
General Conditions
Insurance
Temporary Barricades
Construction Staking
Striping & Signs
Traffic Signal
Interline Conduit
Handicap Ramps & Barricades
Contractor's 0 H & P
$ 5,000
$ 1,213
$ 1,000
$ 1,000
$ 16,38:}
$114,364
$ 3,360
$ 10~500
$152,820
5.0% $ 7~641
$160,461
$160,461
Soft Costs
Design / Engineering
Oversight / Management Fees
TOTAL COSTS
$ 8,700
$ 4,800
$ 13,500
$. 13,500
$173,961
EXHIBIT C
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Developer shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against
claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with
the performance of the work hereunder by the Developer, its agents, representatives, or
employees.
1 Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
1.1 Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11
85 or 88.
1.2
Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92
covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Developer owns no
automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy
described above is acceptable.
1.3 Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and
Employer's Liability Insurance. !ftheDeveloper has no employees while
performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not
required, but Developer shall execute a declaration that it has no employees.
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Developer shall maintain limits on the policies described
in Subsection a. of no less than:
2.1
2.2
2.3
General Liability: Two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily
injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability
Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to this projecfflocation or the general
aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property
damage.
Workers' Compensation as required by the State; Employer's Liability: One
million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease.
3
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must
be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager,
either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as
respects'the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Developer shall
636611.3
Mn)' 22, 2001
-9-
procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim
administration and defense expenses.
4
Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to
contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
4.1
The City, its officers, officials~ employees and volunteers are to be covered as
additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or
on behalf of the Developer; products and completed operations of the Developer;
premises owned, occupied or used by the Developer; or automobiles owned,
leased, hired or borrowed by the Developer. The coverage shall contain no
special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers,
officials, employees or volunteers.
4.2
For any claims related to this project, the Developer's insurance coverage shall be
primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and
volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City, its officers,
officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Developer's insurance
and shall not contribute with it.
4.3
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including
breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers,
officials, employees or volunteers.
4.4 The Developer's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom
claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's
liability.
4.5 Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that
coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by either party, reduced in
coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the City
by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.
4.6 Insurance shall be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less
than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be
considered to comply with these insurance requirements.
4.7
636611.3
May 22, 2001
Developer shall fumish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage
required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized
by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on
forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by
the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the
Developer's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required
ifi-surance p61icies, 'ifldluding endorsements cf footing the coverage-required by
these specifications.
-10-
ITEM 22
APPROVAL
CITYATTORNEY
DIRECTOROFFINANC~
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
ClTY OFTEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 12, 2001
Tract Map Numbers 24136, 24136-2, 24136-3, 24187, located North of De
Portola Road, West of Meadows Parkway, East of Margarita Road and South
of Pio Pico, Montelegro and Leena Way and within Paloma Del Sol Specific
Plan No.219, now conform with their original approvals.
PREPARED BY:
Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Reza James, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve 1) Tract Maps No. 24136, 24136-2,
24136-3, 24187 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval 2) Subdivision Improvement
Agreements 3) Subdivision Monument Agreements and accept the Faithful Performance Bonds,
Labor and Material Bonds and Monument Bonds as security for the agreements.
BACKGROUND: Tract Map No. 24136, 24136-2, 24136-3, 24187 are located within
Planning Area 8 of the Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan No. 219. The Developer has met all of the
Conditions of Approval.
Final Tract Map No. 24136 is an eighty four (84) lot single family residential subdivision with four (4)
open space lots. Final Tract Map No. 24187 is a ninety-two (92) lot single family residential
subdivision with three open space lots. Final Tract Map No. 24136-2 is a seventy four (74) lot single
family residential subdivision with three (3) open space lots. Final Tract Map No. 24136-3 is a
seventy four (74) lot single family residential subdivision with two (2) open space lots. The tracts are
located north of De Portola Road, west of Meadows Parkway, east of Margarita Road and south of
Pio Pico, Montelegro and Leena Way and within Planning Area 8 of the Paloma Del Sol Specific
Plan.
These final maps are in conformance with the approved tentative map. The approval of a
final subdivision map which substantially complies with the previously approved tentative
map is a mandatory ministerial act under State law.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
individual Reports
r:~agdrpt~2001\0612\tr24136
Tract Map 24136
r:\agdrpt~2001\O612\tr24136
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO. TM 24136
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project.
FEE
Development Impact Fee
Quimby Fee
RCFCD (ADP) Fee
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
to be paid prior to issuance of certificate of
Occupancy
N/A
N/A
r:~agd rpt"2.001\0612\t r24136
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT MAP NO. 24136 DATE. June 12, 2001
IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR MONUMENT
SECURITY SECURITY SECURITY
Streetand Drainage $ 532,500 $ 266,250
Water $ 144,000 $ 72,000
Sewer $ 133,500 $ 66,750
TOTAL $ 810,000 $ 405,000 $ 22,100
DEVELOPMENT FEES
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
RCFCD (ADP) Fee
Development Impact Fee
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
Fees Paid to Date
Balance of Fees Due
*To Be Determined.
$ 0.00
$ N/A
$ TBD*
$ 183.00
$ 8.00
$ 2,470.00
$ 1,105.00
$ 3,766.00
$ o.oo
r:~gdrpt~001 \0612\tr24136
PROJEC1
SI. TE
W
W
g\
,or
Tract Map 24136-2
2
r:~agdrpt~2001\0612\tr24136
CiTY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO. TM 24136-2
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project.
FEE
Development Impact Fee
Quimby Fee
RCRCD (ADP)
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
to be paid prior to issuance of certificate of
occupancy
N/A
N/A
3
r:~agdrpt~001\0612\tr24136-2
CiTY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT MAP NO. 24136-2 DATE: June 12, 2001
IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR MONUMENT
SECURITY SECURITY SECURITY
Street and Drainage $ 815,500 $ 407,750
Water $ 176,500 $ 88,250
Sewer $ 139,500 $ 69,750
TOTAL $ 1,131,500 $ 565,750 $ 19,500
DEVELOPMENT FEES
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
RCFCD (ADP) Fee
Development impact Fee
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
Fees Paid to Date
Balance of Fees Due
*To Be Determined.
$ 0.00
$ N/A
$ TBD*
$ 178.00
$ 8.OO
$ 2,29O.OO
$ 975.OO
$ 3,451.00
$ o.oo
3
r:~agdrpt~2001\0612\tr24136-2
PROJE[
SI. TE ..~
/
/
Tract Map 24136-3
3
r:\agdrpt~O01\0612\tr24136
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO. TM 24136-3
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project.
FEE
Development Impact Fee
Quimby Fee
RCFCD (ADP) Fee
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
to be paid prior to issuance of certificate of
occupancy
N/A
N/A
3
r:~agdrpt~001 \612\tr24136-3
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
DATE: June 12, 2001
IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR MONUMENT
SECURITY SECURITY SECURITY
Streetand Drainage $ 612,500 $ 306,250
Water $ 156,000 $ 78,000
Sewer $ 155,000 $ 77,500
TOTAL $ 923,500 $ 461,750 $ 20,020
DEVELOPMENT FEES
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
RCFCD (ADP) Fee
Development Impact Fee
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
Fees Paid to Date
Balance of Fees Due
*To Be Determined.
$ 0.00
$ N/A
$ TBD*
$ 179.00
$ 8.00
$ 2,310.00
$ 1,001.00
$ 3,498.00
$ 0.oo
4
r:~agd rpt~2001\612\tr24136-3
¥~$TA
SI. TE
/
/
3O
L
Tract Map 24187
4
r:\agdrpt~2001\O612\tr24136
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO. TM 24187
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project.
FEE
Development impact Fee
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
To be paid prior to issuance of a building
permit
3
r:~gdrpt~001\0612\tm24187.map
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT MAP NO. 24187 DATE: June 12, 2001
IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY
SECURITY
In Tract Improvements
Street and Drainage $ 500,500 $ 250,250
Water $ 178,500 $ 89,250
Sewer $ 179,000 $ 89,500
TOTAL $ 858,000 $ 429,000
Sunny Meadows Drive Improvements
Street and Drainage $ 391,000 $ 195,500
Water $ 101,000 $ 50,500
Sewer $ 9,500 $ 4,750
Signing & Striping $ 16,500 $ 8,250
TOTAL $ 518,000 $ 259,000
Meadows Parkway Improvements
Medians $ 61,000 $ 30,500
TOTAL $ 61,000 $ 30,500
Monuments $ 23,000
DEVELOPMENT FEES
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
RCFCD (ADP) Fee
Development Impact Fee
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
Fees Paid to Date
Balance of Fees Due
$ 0.00
$ N/A
$ *TBD
$ 196.00
$ 8.oo
$ 2,65O.00
$ 1,150.00
$ 4,0O4.OO
$ o.oo
r:~agdrpt~O01\0612\tm24187.map
CALIFORNIA
?T SITE
VICINITY blip
?RAC? NO. 24
GRAPHIC SCALE
, ?
TRACT NO. 24187
BOUNDARY AND INDEX MAP
GRAPHIC SCALE
203
/
/
LOT
LoT
ITEM 23
ORDINANCE NO. 01-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 9.18 TO THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING LIABILITY TO PERSONS
WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOUD OR UNRULY
ASSEMBLIES WHICH CAUSE DISTURBANCES OF THE
PEACE AND PROVIDING FOR RECOVERY OF LAW
ENFORCEMENT COSTS IN CONNECTION WITH SUCH
ASSEMBLIES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Chapter 9.18, Loud and Unruly Assemblies, is hereby added to
Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows:
"Chapter 9.18
"Loud and Unruly Assemblies
"9.18.010 Notice of Personal Liability for Costs of Special Security Assi,qnment
a. Whenever a police officer responds to a loud or unruly assembly at any
premises within the City and determines that there is reasonable cause to believe that
the assembly constitutes a violation of Penal Code Sections 408, 409, 415 or 416, the
Responsible Person shall be held personally liable for the costs of providing police
personnel and services on the second and subsequent responses of the police to the
premises, within twenty-four (24) hours of the first response, to control the assembly.
"Responsible Person" shall mean: (1) The owner or owners of the premises; (2) the
person or persons in charge of the premises; (3) the person or persons responsible for
the assembly; or (4) the parents or guardians of any such person or persons described
in (1), (2) or (3), if said person is a person under the age of 18.
b. The Responsible Person shall be given a first warning, in the form of
notification by a police officer on the scene that the initial police response shall be
deemed to be the normal police services provided as described in subsection a. In the
event the Responsible Person cannot be located at the time of the first response, the
police officer shall post a written notice on the front door or primary entry door to the
premises or upon the premises if no structure exists on it, that the initial police response
shall be deemed to be the normal police services provided as described in subsection a,
which shall constitute a first warning within the meaning of this section.
c. The police personnel utilized after the first warning to control the
assemblage shall be deemed to be on special security assignment over and above the
normal services provided to the premises.
R:/Ords2001\01-06 1
"9.18.020 Fees and Costs for Special Security Assiqnments
a. The costs of the special security assignment described in Section
9.18.010 shall include personnel and equipment costs expended during the second and
any subsequent returns to the premises. Fees and costs shall be established by
administrative order of the City Manager and shall not exceed the reasonable costs of
providing such services. In addition, such costs may include the cost of repair or
replacement of damaged property owned by the City of Temecula or the County of
Riverside or the costs of injuries to personnel of the City of Temecula or the County of
Riverside arising out of the second and subsequent returns to the premises.
b. All fees and charges levied for the services described in Section 9.18.010
shall be due and payable upon presentation of a bill.
c. All fees and charges for such services shall constitute a valid and existing
debt in favor of the City and against the Responsible Person to whom such services
were rendered, and an immediate cause of action shall accrue to the City for the
collection thereof in any court of competent jurisdiction. The City shall have the right to
assign said rights for the collection of such debt to the County of Riverside or to any
other person.
d. Collection pursuant to this Chapter is not intended to be the exclusive
remedy available to the City relating to the circumstances which gave rise to the need for
police response to the premises and City retains all available remedies, both criminal
and civil, to deal with such circumstances.
"9.18.030 Notice and Hearinq to Determine Reasonableness of Char.qes.
a. The bill for services pursuant this Chapter shall be served upon the
Responsible Person at the address of the premises or such other address as the
Responsible Party has given to the police or the City. Said bill shall be deemed served
upon the Responsible Person upon the earliest date of: (1) Personal service upon the
Responsible Person; or (2) five (5) business days following deposit of the bill in United
States Mail, addressed to the Responsible Person with first class postage prepaid.
b. The Responsible Person charged pursuant to this Chapter shall have five
(5) days after the date of service of the bill to file a written request with the Chief of
Police for a hearing to determine the reasonableness of the charges.
c. Upon receipt of such request, the Chief of Police or his or her designee
shall give the Responsible Person not less than seven (7) days written notice of the time
and place of the hearing to determine the reasonableness of the fees and charges.
d. The hearing shall be conducted by the Chief of Police or his or her
designated representative, who shall act as the Hearing Officer. The hearing shall be
conducted within twenty-one (21) days following the filing of the request for hearing. The
Hearing Officer shall consider all relevant evidence, including but not limited to
applicable staff and pblice reports. The Hearing Officer shall give the Responsible
Person, or his or her representative, and interested persons the opportunity to be heard
in conjunction therewith. Based upon the evidence presented, the Hearing Officer shall
determine the reasonableness of the fees and charges imposed. The Hearing Officer
R:/Ords2001\01-06 2
shall serve written notice of his or her decision to the Responsible Party by personal
service of such decision or mailing such decision to the Responsible Person in
accordance with the procedures for service set forth in subsection a.
e. The decision of the Hearing Officer shall be final and conclusive in the
absence of an appeal as provided in subsection f.
f. The Responsible Person may appeal the decision of the Hearing Officer
to the City Manager. The appeal shall be filed with the City Clerk within ten (10) days
following the date of service of the Hearing Officer's decision on the Responsible Party.
The City Manager's review of the decision of the Hearing Officer shall be limited to the
record of the hearing before the Hearing Officer. The City Manager shall afford the
Responsible Party an opportunity to be heard on the issues, but no new evidence shall
be introduced before the City Manager. Such opportunity to be heard before the City
Manager shall be held within fifteen (15) days following the date the notice of appeal is
received and the City Manager shall provide the Responsible Person not less than
seven (7) days notice prior the hearing. The City Manger shall issue a written decision
within five (5) days of the conclusion of the City Manager's hearing on the issues.
g. The decision of the City Manager shall be final and conclusive and no
further administrative appeals shall be allowed."
Section 2. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any
reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would
have passed this ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact
that any one or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise
invalid.
Section 3. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the passage
and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published
and posted in the manner required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of June, 2001.
ATTEST:
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:/Ords2001\01-06 3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, DO HEREBY CERTIFY
that the foregoing Ordinance No. 01-06 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at
a regular meeting of the City Council on the 22"d day of May, 2001 and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the 12th of June, 2001, by the following vote:
AYES: 0
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:/Ords2001\01-06 4
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM 1
~ ,
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
MARCH 27, 2001
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:30
P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. President
Stone presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
5 DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, and
Stone
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Award of Construction Contract for the Rancho California Sports Park Culvert
Modification Proiect - Project No. PW00-23CSD
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
Award a contract for the Rancho California Sports Park Culvert Modification
Project - Project No. PW00-23CSD to KEC Engineering for $59,750.00 and
authorize the President to execute the contract;
1.2
Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $5,975.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract
amount;
1.3
Approve an appropriation of $25,000.00 from Development Impact Fees - Park
and Recreation for the Rancho California Sports Park Culvert Modification
Project.
MOTION: Director Comerchero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion
was seconded by Director Roberts and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of
Director Naggar who abstained.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
No additional comments.
Minutes.csd\032701 I
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
Community Services Director Parker invited the community to the upcoming Sports Park Workshop,
on Saturday, April 7, 2001, at 9:00 A.M., at City Hall, in the City Council Chambers.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
Commending Community Services Director Parker and the Community Services Department staff
on a job well done, General Manager Nelson advised that the City had received four State-wide
awards at the California Parks and Recreation Society Annual Conference for the following:
· two First Place Awards for the Annual Recreation Brochure and the High Hopes
Video Program
· one Second Place Award for the High Hopes Program
· one Second Place Award for the marketing campaign for the Temecula Valley
Museum
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
No comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:33 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, April 10, 2001, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, President
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
Minutes,csd\032701 2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
APRIL 10, 200t
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at
8:34 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts,
and President Stone.
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None.
Also present were General Manager Nelson, Assistant City Attorney Curley, and City Clerk
Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Completion and Acceptance for the Rancho California Sports Park Desiltation Project -
2
R:\Minutes\041001
Project No. PW00-01CSD
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Accept the Rancho California Sports Park Desiltation Project - Project No.
PW00-01CSD as complete;
1.2 File a Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-
year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
1.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven months after filing of the Notice
of Completion if no liens have been filed.
It was noted that Director Naggar abstained from this item.
Ratification of Election Results - Tract No. 29286
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 01-06
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
RECITING THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MAIL-IN BALLOT
ELECTION HELD ON APRIL 5, 200'1 DECLARING THE
RESULTS AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY
LAW
1
3 Authorization to Release a Formal Bid for the Chaparral High School Aquatic Facility
Proiect
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Approve the Plans and Specifications and authorize the release of a formal
public bid for the Chaparral High School Aquatic Facility Project.
MOTION: Noting that he would be abstaining from Consent Calendar Item No. 1, Director
Naggar moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 2, and 3. The motion was seconded
by Director Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
MOTION: Director Comerchero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion
was seconded by Director Roberts and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of
Director Naggar who abstained.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
No input.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
No input.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
A.
Director Naggar congratulated Director of Community Services Director of Community
Services Parker, and the Community Services Departmental staff for the awards
presented earlier this evening.
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:36 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to
next regular meeting on Tuesday, April 24, 2001, scheduled to follow the City Council Consent
Calendar in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Jeffrey E. Stone, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
R:\Minutes\041001
2
ITEM 2
A p p ROV~j~.,6~ ,~
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAClCE__~__~_
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OFTEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
June 12, 2001
Inclusion of Tracts into Service Level B and Acceptance of Slope Easement
Areas into Service Level C for Fiscal Year 2001-2002.
PREPARED BY:
Barbara Smith, Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors:
1. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2001-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACCEPTING CERTAIN TRACTS INCLUDING
VAIL RANCH INTO TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B FOR PURPOSES OF ENERGIZING
RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTS BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002.
2. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACCEPTING CERTAIN SLOPE AND
LANDSCAPE AREAS WITHIN VARIOUS TRACTS INCLUDING VAIL RANCH
INTO SERVICE LEVEL C FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSES BEGINNING FISCAL
YEAR 2001-2002.
3. Authorize the City Clerk/District Secretary to record the slope easement documents.
BACKGROUND: Prior to the beginning of each new fiscal year, applications are
reviewed regarding the acceptance of perimeter slope areas, residential street lighting, and the
inclusion of additional subdivisions into existing TCSD maintenance programs. Energy costs for
residential street lighting is provided through Service Level B and perimeter slope and landscape
areas are maintained through Service Level C.
For Fiscal Year 2001-2002, twenty-eight (28) and the parcels within those tracts will be levied within
the Service Level B Rates and Charges at $25.68 per parcel, as follows:
Tract No. 23100-08
Tract No. 23173-00
Tract No. 23173-01
Tract No. 23173-02
Tract No. 23173-03
Tract No. 23173-04
Tract No, 23174-01
Tract No. 23174-02
Tract No. 23174-03
Tract No. 23174-04
Tract No. 23174-05
Tract No. 23174-06
Tract No. 23371-00
Tract No. 23371-08
Tract No. 24182-03
Tract No. 24182-04
Tract No. 24183-01
Tract No. 24188-01
Tract No. 28480-00
Tract No. 28482-00
Tract No. 28482-01
Tract No. 28482-02
Tract No. 28482-03
Tract No. 28526-00
Tract No. 28810-00
Tract No. 29033-00
Tract No. 29036-00
Tract No. 29286-00
In addition, the following tracts and Vail Ranch area have completed the necessary Proposition 218
proceedings for the transfer of perimeter landscaping into the TCSD maintenance program
beginning Fiscal Year 2001-2002. The landscaping has been inspected and approved by the TCSD
Maintenance Superintendent. The proposed inclusion of this area in to Service Level C, will result
in the annual levy of various amounts, as noted below, per residential parcel within the various
tracts.
Rate Level #3 - $116.00
Tract No. 29286-00
Rate Level #4 - $175.00
Tract No. 23143-02
Tract No. 23143-03
Tract No. 23143-04
Rate Level #5 - $70.00
Tract No. 23371-00
Tract No. 23371-01
Tract No. 23371-02
Tract No. 23371-03
Tract No. 23371-04
Tract No. 23371-05
Tract No. 23371-06
Tract No. 23371-07
Tract No. 23371-08
Tract No. 23371-09
Tract No. 23371-10
Tract No. 23371-11
Tract No. 23371-14
Tract No. 23371-15
Tract No. 28482-00
Tract No. 28482-01
Tract No. 28482-02
Tract No. 28482-03
Tract No. 28526-00
Tract No. 29033-00
Rate Level #6 - $225.00
Tract No. 28510-00
Tract No. 28510-01
Tract No. 28510-02
Tract No. 28510-03
Rate Level #7 - $129.00 (New Level for Vail Ranch)
Tract No. 23173-00
Tract No. 23173-01
Tract No. 23173-02
Tract No. 23173-03
Tract No. 23173-04
Tract No. 23174-01
Tract No. 23174-02
Tract No. 23174-03
Tract No. 23174-04
Tract No. 23174-05
Tract No. 23174-06
Tract No. 28480-00
Tract No. 28832-00
FISCAL IMPACT: Acceptance of the aforementioned tracts and the parcels within those
tracts into the appropriate service levels has been incorporated into the TCSD budgets for Service
Level B and C for Fiscal Year 2001-2002.
AI-rACHMENTS:
Resolution to accept certain tracts into Service Level B.
Resolution to accept certain slopes into Service Level C
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2001-.__
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACCEPTING CERTAIN TRACTS INCLUDING
VAIL RANCH INTO TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B FOR PURPOSES OF ENERGIZING
RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTS BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Board of Directors does hereby find and determine as follows:
A. The Temecula Community Services District has assumed costs
associated with energizing the street lighting within the following residential Tracts No.:
Tract No. 23100-08
Tract No. 23173-00
Tract No. 23173-01
Tract No. 23173-02
Tract No. 23173-03
Tract No. 23173-04
Tract No. 23174-01
Tract No. 23174-02
Tract No. 23174-03
Tract No. 23174-04
Tract No. 23174-05
Tract No. 23174-06
Tract No. 23371-00
Tract No. 23371-08
Tract No. 24182-03
Tract No. 24182-04
Tract No. 24183-01
Tract No. 24188-01
Tract No. 28480-00
Tract No. 28482-00
Tract No. 28482-01
Tract No. 28482-02
Tract No. 28482-03
Tract No. 28526-00
Tract No. 28810-00
Tract No. 29033-00
Tract No. 29036-00
Tract No. 29286-00
B. The Temecula Community Services District is currently providing
residential street lighting services within these subdivisions through Service Level B; and
C. The Temecula Community Services District is the authorized
legislative body to accept the responsibility of energizing residential street lights within the City of
Temecula.
Section 2. The Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District hereby
accepts the aforementioned residential tracts into the Service Level B rate level for residential street
lighting services beginning Fiscal Year 2001-2002.
Section 3. The Secretary shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula
Community Services District at a regular meeting held on the 12th of June, 2001.
Jeffrey E. Stone, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 2001-.__ was duly adopted
by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the regular meeting
thereof, held on the 12th day of June, 2001, by the following vote of the Board of Directors,
AYES: DIRECTORS:
NOES: DIRECTORS:
ABSENT: DIRECTORS:
ABSTAIN: DIRECTORS:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACCEPTING CERTAIN SLOPE AND
LANDSCAPE AREAS WITHIN VARIOUS TRACTS INCLUDING VAIL RANCH
INTO SERVICE LEVEL C FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSES BEGINNING FISCAL
YEAR 2001-2002.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Board of Directors does hereby find and determine as follows:
A. The conditions of approval for various tracts (see EXHIBIT A) required the
developer to improve the perimeter slopes and landscaping as part of the overall subdivision
improvements; and,
B. The annexation of the Vail Ranch area will become effective on July 1,
2001. The perimeter slopes and parkways being maintained by CSA 143 will become the
responsibility of the Temecula Community Services District, and
C. The annual parcel charges for perimeter landscaping and slope
maintenance services pursuant to Proposition 218, were established by the majority of the
property owners of the various tracts, and
D. The Temecula Community Services District is the existing authorized
iegislative body authorized to provide maintenance of perimeter slope and landscape areas
within the aforementioned developments.
Section 2.
hereby accepts:
The Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District
A. The offer of dedication for the improved slopes and perimeter landscaping
within tracts identified in EXHIBIT A, and
B. The inclusion of said area into the Service Level C rate level for
maintenance purposes beginning Fiscal Year 2001-2002, more particularly described in Exhibit
B attached hereto and incorporated into this resolution by reference.
Section 3. The Secretary shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community
Services District at a regular meeting held on the 12th of June, 2001.
Jeffrey E. Stone, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 2001-.__ was duly
adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the regular
meeting thereof, held on the 12th day of June, 2001, by the following vote of the Board of
Directors.
AYES: DIRECTORS:
NOES: DIRECTORS:
ABSENT:
DIRECTORS:
ABSTAIN:
DIRECTORS:
Rate Level #3 - $116.00
Tract No. 29286-00
Rate Level #4 - $175.00
Tract No. 23143-02
Tract No. 23143-03
Tract No. 23143-04
Rate Level #5 - $70.00
Tract No. 23371-00
Tract No. 23371-01
Tract No. 23371-02
Tract No. 23371-03
Tract No. 23371-04
Tract No. 23371-05
Tract No. 23371-06
Tract No. 23371-07
Tract No. 23371-08
Tract No. 23371-09
Tract No. 23371-10
Tract No. 23371-11
Tract No. 23371-14
Tract No. 23371-15
Tract No. 28482-00
Tract No. 28482-01
Tract No. 28482-02
Tract No. 28482-03
Tract No. 28526-00
Tract No. 29033-00
Rate Level #6 - $225.00
Tract No. 28510-00
Tract No. 28510-01
Tract No. 28510-02
Tract No. 28510-03
EXHIBIT A
Date Final Map
Recorded
12/07/00
07/01/99
07/01/99
07/01/99
02/29/OO
04/05/90
06/11/90
08/07/90
08/07/90
09/10/90
09/15/97
02/17/98
02/29/00
09/14/98
09/14/98
12/01/98
06/29/98
09/20/96
12/22/00
04/13/00
04/13/00
08/14/O0
12/21/98
04/22/99
08/30/00
08/30/00
08/30/00
08/30/00
Election
Date
04/05/01
06/02/99
06/02/99
06/02/99
O2/28/0O
02/28/00
02/28/0O
02/28/O0
02/28/00
02/28/00
02/28/00
02/28/00
02/28/00
02/28/00
02/28/00
02/28/00
02/28/00
02/28/00
02/28/00
02/28/00
02/28/00
02/28/00
02/28/00
02/28/00
05/11/00
05/11/00
05/11/00
05/11/00
Rate Level #7 - $129.00 (New Level for Vail Ranch) Area to be Annexed into the City of
Temecula effective July 1, 2001
Tract No. 23173-00
Tract No. 23173-01
Tract No. 23173-02
Tract No. 23173-03
Tract No. 23173-04
Tract No. 23174-01
Tract No. 23174-02
Tract No. 23174-03
Tract No. 23174-04
Tract No. 23174-05
Tract No. 23174-06
Tract No. 28480-00
Tract No. 28832-00
Exhibit B
VICINITY MAP FOR TCSD PERIMETER SLOPE AND
LANDSCAPE AREAS
r'O' 0 ....
~ I I r~~ I
' ~ ~- · ~:~" : .L .:.' ....'" ·
,- ~i ~ STREET
~ o~ ,I!-.4 ...... _'--_'~ '"'
~.I.. .~. , ~ ....... ..I.
,_,,,~,,.I o__,=11 ,- I .-~F~ ,'
,01'_ ,,. ,;k,_~___j............<<---.fl ..,
'". STREE. T; ;'A
~-- ........
99999999
--. z
~ 0
0 LU UJ ~
0 0 0
~ ~o~ ~o o
L):LO. OD
:
COURT
DRIVE
ITEM 3
APPROVAL
CiTY ATTORNEY l~, ,//~./I
FINANCE DIRECTO.~~
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
ClTY OFTEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Servicest~~
June 12, 2001
Amendment to the Landscape Maintenance Contract with Excel
Landscape, Inc. for FY2001-02
PREPARED BY:
Kevin T. Harrington, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
1. Approve the Landscape Maintenance Services Contract Amendment with Excel Landscape, Inc'
to extend the term of the Agreement to June 30, 2003, allow for the addition of supplemental
landscape maintenance areas and establish set prices for the addition of unforeseen areas.
2. Authorize the expenditure of funds in the amount of $1,106,100 for the base c°ntract and an
additional amount not to exceed $32,200 for the supplemental and new areas that may be
brought on line during the term of the contract.
3. Approve contingency of 10% in the amount of $114,000 for extra work items.
BACKGROUND: Excel Landscape, Inc. (Excel) has been providing landscape maintenance
services for the City under this agreement since July 1, 1997. At the start of this contract Excel only
provided maintenance services for approximately half of the City's sites. However, due to their
exceptional performance over the past several years, they have assumed the landscape
maintenance responsibilities of all City sites. Excel has consistently provided excellent service to
the City and the residents of Temecula.
Staff is requesting that the term of the agreement for landscape maintenance services be extended
for an additional two years, until June 30, 2003. Excel has agreed to hold their current costs for the
next two years on all existing maintenance areas. They have also utilized those base costs to
establish costs for the new maintenance areas that will be added to the agreement effective July 1,
2001. Additional areas include Temeku Hills, Crowne Hill and Campos Verdes developments.
The City will be annexing the Vail Ranch area as well. Excel currently maintains the Vail Ranch
area for County Service Area 143. Their experience and knowledge of the Vail Ranch area will be a
very valuable asset to the City. The information they will provide the City regarding general site
conditions, problem areas, drainage issues, irrigation controller issues, to name a few, will assist us
in providing a smooth transfer of the maintenance responsibilities from County Service Area 143 to
R:~IARRINGK~AGENDA.RPT~Excel Amendment 9 FY 01-02.doc
the City. The experience that Excel has with the current site conditions will greatly assist the City
with the planning and implementation our rehabilitation program that is required to bring the site up
to the City of Temecula standard.
Additionally, if the term of the agreement is extended, Excel has also requested that the City allow
them to remove and replace approximately sixty (60) ageing irrigation controllers throughout various
City maintained slope areas and replace them with Evapotranspiration (Eto) based, state of the art.
water saving irrigation controllers. This exchange would be done at no cost or obligation to the City.
The replacement controllers should greatly enhance our water conservation efforts. If the new
controllers prove to be unsuccessful, Excel will remove them and replace the old controllers upon
our request. The new controllers have been installed at a two City sites for testing and are currently
performing quite well,
The amendment also has provisions that will allow for the addition of supplemental landscape
maintenance contract areas and unforeseen areas to come on line during the remaining term of the
agreement.
The base contract amount is $1,106,100 and the amount for the supplemental areas and new
areas is $32,200.
In addition to the General Landscape Maintenance Services Expenditure and the Supplemental
Areas the TCSD is requesting the approval of a 10% contingency in the amount of $114,000 for
extra work items. The required extra work items may include repairing, rehabilitating and improving
City sites,
FISCAL IMPACT: The amount of the contract for Excel Landscape, Inc. including the
supplemental and new areas to be added during the term of the contract and the contingency for
Fiscal Year 2001-02 is $1,252,300. Sufficient funds have been included in the TCSD Annual
Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2000-01 in accounts 190-180, 190-181,190-182, 190-184, 190-
185, 193-180, 340-701,340-702, 001-164 and 001-171.
ATTACHMENTS:
Original Agreement
Eight (8) Subsequent Amendments
Amendment No. 9
R:~kRRINGKLn_G ENDA.RPT~Excel Amendment 9 FY 01-02.doc
AMENDMENT NO. 9 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND
EXCEL LANDSCAPE DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES
THIS NINTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of June 12, 2001, by
and between the Temecula Community Services District ("District") and Excel Landscape, Inc., a
California corporation ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions
set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes,
which the parties agree are true and correct:
a. On June 24, 1997, the City and Contractor, for the benefit of the
District, entered into an Agreement for landscape maintenance services within the City's
greenbelts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas, parks and rights -of-way.
b. The original Agreement was amended on July 1, 1998, August 11,
1998, January 11, 1998, March 22, 1999, April 5, 1999, April 15, 1999, June 22, 1999
AND June 27, 2000, in order to add areas to the Contractor's Scope of Work. The June
24, 1997 Agreement, as amended, shall be referred to as the "Agreement."
c. It is now the desire of the parties to amend this Agreement to
extend the term of the Agreement for an additional period of two (2) years to June 30,
2003, provide for revisions to the areas to be maintained and establish pricing for
maintaining these areas and new areas.
2. Exhibit A, Landscape Maintenance Contract Areas, attached to this Ninth
Amendment, is hereby substituted in place of Exhibit A to the Agreement.
3. Exhibit B, Supplemental Landscape Maintenance Contract Areas, attached
to this Ninth Amendment, is hereby substituted in place of Exhibit B to the Agreement.
4. District may add new areas to be maintained by Contractor in accordance
with the specifications and terms of this Agreement. District shall pay contractor for such new
areas at the rates set forth in Exhibit C.
5. The term of the Agreement is extended to June 30, 2003.
6. This Amendment shall be effective July 1, 2001.
7. Any litigation concerning this Contract shall take place in the municipal,
superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula.
8. Pmhlhited lntereat. No member, officer, or employee of the City of
Temecula or of a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the
proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter.
R:\HARRrNGK'~AGRE EMNT~Excel Landscape 5-01 Amend.9.doc
Furthermore, the contractor/consultant covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board
member, officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-
contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party
other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either
party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all such information will be made, in writing,
to the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest
under Article 4 (commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220)
of Division 4 of Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California.
9. Written Nntiee Any written notice required to be given in any part of the
Contract Departments shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage
prepaid, directed to the address of the Contractor as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to
the CITY addressed as follows:
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
P.O. Box 9033
10. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and
conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
Jeffrey E. Stone
President
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attomey/District Counsel
EXCEL LANDSCAPE, INC., a California Corporation
By:
Name:
Title:
By:
Name:
Title:
(Two signatures of Corporate Officers
is required).
R:XHARRiNGKLa. GREEMNT~xcel Landscap~ 5-01 Amend.9.dcc
Site #
P-1
P-2
P-3
P-4
P-5
P-6
P-7
P-9
P-10
P-Il
P-12
P-13
P-14
P-15
P-16
P-17
P-18
P-19
EXHIBIT A
Landscape Maintenance Contract Areas
(Amended as of July 1, 2001)
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS SERVICE AREA
Site Name
Veterans Park
Sam Hicks Monument Park
Calle Aragon Park
Bahia Vista Park
Loma Linda Park
Riverton Park
John Magee Park
Voorburg Park
Nicolas Road Park
Butterfield Stage Park
Temecula Duck Pond
Rotary Park
Nakayama Park
Winchester Creek Park
Long Canyon Creek Park
Vail Ranch Park A (Paseo Park)
Vail Ranch Park B (Lot 115)
Vail Ranch Park C (Lot169)
Monthly Price Annual Price
$1,550.00 $18,600.00
800.00 9,600.00
250.00 3,000.00
250.00 3,000.00
707.00 8,484.00
1,617.00 19,404.00
310.00 3,720.00
303.00 3,636.00
812.00 9,744.00
782.00 9,384.00
2,155.00 25,860.00
300.00 3,600.00
125.00 1,500.00
1,568.00 18,816.00
1,000.00 12,000.00
5,183.00 62,196.00
557.00 6,684.00
580.00 6,960.00
TOTAL ~18,8_49.00 $226,_188,00
EXHIBIT A, page 1 of 7
R:\HARRINGK\AGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 50I Amend 9.doc
STREETSCAPE SERVICE AREA
Site # Site Name
SS-1 Via Eduardo Streetscape
FC-1 Nada Lane
Monthly Price
$106.00
$i65.00
TOTAL $ 271.00
Annual Price
$1,272.00
$1,980.00
$ 3,252.00
EXHIBIT A, page 2 of 7
R:\[IARR[NGK\AGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 5-01 Amend 9 doc
SPORTS PARKS SERVICE AREA
Site
SP-I
SP-2
SP-3
SP-4
SP-5
SP-6
Site Name
Rancho California Sports Park
Paloina Del Sol Park
Pala Community Park
Kent Hintergardt Park
Margarita Community Park
Temeku Hills Park
Monthly Price
$9,294.00
3,592.00
2,333.00
3,359.00
3,147.00
3,600.00
Annual Price
$111,528.00
43,104.00
27,996.00
40,308.00
37,764.00
43,200.00
TOTAL
~25~325~.00
~303~900.00
EXHIBIT A, page 3 of 7
R:\HARRINGK\AGREEMN [\Excel Landscape 5-01 Amend.9.doc
MEDIANS SERVICE AREA
Site #
M-1
M-2
M-3
M-4
M-5
M-6
M~7
M-8
M-9
M-10
M-Il
M-12
M-16
M-17
M-21
M-22
Site Name Monthly Price
Rancho California Road Median $400.00
Ynez Road Median (Solana Way/Overland) 575.00
Butterfield Stage Road Median 150.00
Margarita Road Median at Rancho Cal. Rd I00.00
Margarita Road Median at 79 South 100.00
Margarita Road Median at Solana Ridge 50.00
Margarita Road Median at Tuscany Ridge 100.00
Margarita Road Median at Winchester Rd. 50.00
Margarita Road Median at Promenade Mall 300.00
Margarita Road Median at Avenida Sonoma 75.00
Winchester Road Median at Jefferson 100.00
Rancho California Rd. Median at Portafino 100.00
Rancho Cal. Rd. Median at Margarita Rd. 25.00
Pala Road Bridge Median at 79S 150.00
Margarita Road Median at Pauba Rd. 50.00
Meadows Parkway Median at RC Rd. 200.00
TOTAL $ 2,525.00
Annual Price
$4,800.00
6,900.00
1,800.00
1,200.00
1,200.00
600.00
1,200.00
600.00
3,600.00
900.00
1,200.00
1,200.00
300.00
1,800.00
600.00
2,400.00
~30~300.00
EXHIBIT A, page 4 of 7
COMMUNITY FACILITIES SERVICE AREA
Site #
F-I
F-2
F-3
F-4
F-6
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-10
Site Name
Community Recreation Center
Senior Center
City Hall/Maintenance Facility
Temecula Community Center
Fire Station #84
Old Town Parking Lot A
Old Town Streetscape
Temecula Valley Museum
Old Town Parking Lot B
Temecula Childrens Museum
Monthly Price
$1,444.00
361.00
541.00
193.00
40O.00
250.00
987.00
285.00
250.00
155.00
Annual Price
$17,328.00
4,332.00
6,492.00
2,316.00
4,800.00
3,000.00
11,844.00
3,420.00
3,000.00
1,860.00
TOTAL
$ 4,866.00
$ 58,392.00
EXHIBIT A, page 5 of 7
R:\HARRINGK\AGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 5-01 Amend.9.doc
SLOPE SERVICE AREA
(SOUTH)
Site #
S-3a
S-3b
S-4
S-8
S-12
S-13
S-16
S-20
S-21
Site Name
Rancho Highlands
Rancho Highlands - Ynez Road Slope
The Vineyards
The Villages A and B
Vintage Hills
Presley (Viranda, Country
Glen, Bridlevale)
Tradewinds
Crown Hill
Vail Ranch
Monthly Price
$515.00
1,000.00
255.00
4,734.00
4,600.00
1,408.00
863.00
1,428.00
10,753.00
Annual Price
$6,180.00
12,000.00
3,060.00
56,808.00
55,200.00
16,896.00
10,356.00
17,136.00
129,036.00
TOTAL
$__25,556,00
$ 306,672.00
EXHIBIT A, page 6 of 7
R:\HARRINGK\AGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 5-01 Amend 9.doc
SLOPE SERVICE AREA
(NORTH)
Site # Site Name Monthly Price Annual Price
S-1 Saddlewood/Pavillion Point $2,372.00 $28,464.00
S-2 Winchester Creek I and II 1,202.00 14,424.00
S-5 Signet Series 2,534.00 30,408.00
S-6 Woo&rest Country 559.00 6,708.00
S-7 Ridgeview 773.00 9,276.00
S-9 Rancho Solana 130.00 1,560.00
S-10 Martinique 355.00 4,260.00
S-11 Meadowview Estates 150.00 1,800.00
S-14 Mirada 394.00 4,728.00
S- 15 Barclay Estates 344.00 4,128.00
S- 17 Monte Vista 65.00 780.00
S-18 Temeku Hills 3,640.00 43,680.00
S-19 Campos Verdes 2,065.00 24,780.00
S-22 Lennar 195.00 2,340.00
TOTAL _$.~1~,778.00 $177,336.00
EXHIBITA a e7of7
R:\HARR[NGK\AGREEMNT\Excet Landscape 5-01 Amend 9.doc
Site #
M-13
M-14
M-15
M-18
M-19
M -20
M-23
M-24
EXHIBIT B
Supplemental Landscape Maintenance Contract Areas
(Amended as of July 1, 2001)
MEDIANS SERVICE AREA
Site Name
Paseo Del Sol Median Islands
Overland Dive Median at Ynez Rd.
Margarita Rd. Median at Pio Pico
Margarita Rd. Median at Date Street
DePortola Rd. Median at Capanula PDS
Butterfield Stage Rd. Median at Crown Hill
Pala Rd. Medians
Meadows Parkway Medians at Paseo Del Sol
Monthly Price
500.00
100.00
200.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
250.00
200.00
TOTAL
$ 1,_5~0~0
Annual Price
6,000.00
1,200.00
2,400.00
1,200.00
1,200.00
1,200.00
3,000.00
2,400.00
18,600.00
EXHIBIT B, page 1 of 2
Site #
SS-2
SS-3
STREETSCAPE SERVICE AREAS
Site Name
Pauba Road Streetscape at Rancho Calif.
Sports Park
Rancho Calif. Rd. Streetscape at 1-15
Monthly Price
$ 200.0O
$ 100.00
_$~300.00
TOTAL
Annual Price
$ 2,400.00
$ 1,200.00
3,600.00
EXHIBIT B, page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT C
New Landscape Contract Maintenance Services
(Amended As of July 1, 2001)
Maintenance Service
Sports Park Maintenance (includes ballfield prep.) ·
Park Maintenance
Slope Area Maintenance
Slope Area Maintenance (turf)
Median Maintenance
Facility Maintenance
Ballfield Preperation (single field)
Ballfield Preperation (two field or more)
Price per Square Foot
Monthly Annually
.OO85 / 0.102
.0100 / 0.12
.0070 / 0.084
.0100 / 0.12
.0200 / 0.24
.0200 / 0.24
45.00 per week (Monday thru Friday)
35.00 ea. per week (Monday thru Friday)
EXHIBIT C, page 1 of 1
ITEM 4
APPROVAI~h ~
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCI~'N---
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services.~
June 12, 2001
TCSD Proposed Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 2001-2002
PREPARED BY: Barbara Smith, Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
1. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING
RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL B - RESIDENTIAL
STREET LIGHTING, SERVICE LEVEL C - SLOPE MAINTENANCE,
AND SERVICE LEVEL D RECYCLING AND REFUSE
COLLECTION SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002.
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING
RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL R - STREET AND
ROAD MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the TCSD Rates and Charges is to provide necessary
community services and programs to property owners within the City of Temecula. The TCSD
operates under the authority of Community Services District Law and its boundaries are the same as
those of the City of Temecula.
Property owners pay only for the TCSD services that they actually receive through separate rates
and charges on their property tax bill. The Community Services, Parks and Recreation and Service
Level A Rates and Charges previously levied by the TCSD were replaced by the City's Parks/Street
Lighting Tax, approved by the voters as Measure C on March 4, 1997. Although the TCSD
continues to operate and maintain the parks and recreational facilities through a cooperative
agreement with the City, the actual levy budget for the special tax will be considered by the City
Council on June 12, 2001.
As a result, the TCSD is currently comprised of the following four (4) remaining service levels:
Service Level B - Residential Street Liqhts. Operations, maintenance, utility costs
and administration of residential street lighting.
Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance. Operations,
maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and administration for all perimeter
landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD.
Service Level D - Refuse Collection, Rec¥clinq and Street Sweepinq. Operation and
administration of the refuse and recycling program, and street sweeping services for
single family residences.
Service Level R - Streets and Roads. Operations, construction, and maintenance of
streets and roads throughout the City.
Service Level "B" includes only those property owners within residential subdivisions that receive
street lighting services. The proposed rate of $25.68 per property owner has not been increased
from last fiscal year.
Service Level "C" includes only those property owners within residential subdivisions receiving
TCSD maintenance of slopes and perimeter landscaping. The six (6) rate levels for Service Level
"C" will not increase from last year and a new rate ~evel will become effective July 1,2001 for Vail
Ranch. The rate levels are identified as follows:
Rate C-1: $ 46.00
Rate C-2: $ 89.00
Rate C-3: $116.00
Rate C-4: $175.00
Rate C-5: $ 70.00
Rate C-6: $225.00
Rate C-7: $129.00
Service Level "D" provides refuse, recycling and street sweeping services to all single family
residential properties in the City of Temecula. The proposed rate of $172.56 per property owner has
not been increased from last fiscal year.
Service Level "R" includes only those parcels which receive services for the maintenance of certain
unpaved roads that are washed out during rainstorms. The proposed rates for this service level will
not increase from last year. The two (2) rate levels for Service Level R are identified as follows:
Residential Rate R-l: $115.26
Vacant Rate R-l: $ 57.64
Residential Rate Ro2: $121.92
Vacant Rate R-2: $ 60.96
061300
R :\ya sinobk\TCS DLEV Y.2000bod
The levy formula used to fund these services has not been changed from last fiscal year. Only
those property owners who receive services from a particular service level pay for those services. In
summary, the average single family residence receiving benefit from all service levels will not
receive an increase in the TCSD Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 2001-2002.
The levy and collection of the TCSD Rates and Charges is exempt from the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 21080 (b)(8) of the California
Public Resources Code and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the rates and charges
are necessary to maintain existing services within the TCSD.
FISCAL IMPACT: The total Levy Budget for Fiscal Year 2001-2002 is $4,447,937.00.
The revenue generated from the TCSD Rates and Charges will fund slope maintenance; residential
street lighting; recycling and refuse collection services; and streets and road maintenance in the City
of Temecula.
ATrACHMENTS:
Resolution No. CSD 2001-__ Service Levels B, C, and D.
Resolution No CSD 2001-___ Service Level R.
Final Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2001-2002.
R:\ya sinobk\TCS DLEVY.2000b od 061300
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING
RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL B - RESIDENTIAL
STREET LIGHTING, SERVICE LEVEL C - SLOPE MAINTENANCE,
AND SERVICE LEVEL D RECYCLING AND REFUSE
COLLECTION SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE
DISTRICT HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, effective December 1,
1969, voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District ("TCSD"), to
provide specified services to properties within its jurisdiction.
Section 2. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the
TCSD has prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for the services furnished by it,
and has elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner,
by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, property
taxes within the TCSD in the manner prescribed by Government Code Sections 61765.2 to
61765.6, inclusive. By previous resolution, the TCSD proposed to continue such rates and
charges for the operation, maintenance, service and administration of residential street lighting,
slope maintenance, and recycling and refuse collection services for Fiscal Year 2001-2002.
Section 3. Pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, the TCSD caused a
written report ("Report") to be prepared and filed with the Secretary of the TCSD, which Report
contains a description of each parcel of real property and the proposed amount of the rates and
charges for Fiscal Year 2001-2002. The Report is based upon a budget adopted by the Board
of Directors for the proposed services for specific areas where such services are provided,
including necessary staff and administrative expenses. A summary or the Report containing the
proposed rates and charges is attached hereto as Exhibit A, entitled "Project Summary", and
incorporated herein by this reference. A copy of the Report is on file in the office of the
Secretary of the TCSD, and is available for public inspection.
Section 4. By previous resolution, the Board of Directors acknowledged the filing
of the Report, and appointed a time and place for a public hearing on the Report and the
proposed rates and charges. Notice of the public hearing was mailed and published as required
by law and affidavits of publication and mailing are on file with the Secretary of the TCSD.
Section 5. On June 12, 2001, the Board of Directors conducted a public hearing
on the Report and the proposed rates and charges. At the public hearing, the Board of Directors
heard and considered all oral and written objections, protests and comments by any interested
person concerning the Report, the proposed rates and charges, and the method of collection of
such rates and charges.
Section 6. The Board of Directors hereby finds that, based on the Report and
the District budget, the rates and charges as set out on Exhibit "A" do not exceed the reasonable
cost of the services to be provided by the TCSD for Fiscal Year 2001-2002.
Section 7. The Board of Directors hereby overrules any and all objections and
protests and adopts the rates and charges for residential street lighting, slope maintenance, and
recycling and refuse collection services for Fiscal Year 2001-2002 as set out on Exhibit "A" for
the services to be provided by the TCSD for Fiscal Year 2001-2002.
Section 8. The TCSD shall collect such rates and charges at the same time and
in the same manner and by the same persons as, together with and not separately from, the
property taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shall be delinquent at the
same time and thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes.
All laws applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not
limited to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and
redemption, are applicable to these rates and charges, except for California Revenue and
Taxation Code Section 4831. However, if for the first year the charge is tevied, the real property
to which the charge relates has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value,
or if a lien of a bona fide encumbranoer for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior
to the date on which the first installment of such taxes appear on the roll, then the charge shall
not result in a lien against the property, but instead shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for
collection.
Section 9. If a property owner subject to these rates and charges questions the
classification of the owner's property for Fiscal Year 2001-2002, or claims that an error has been
made with respect to the implementation of the rates and charges or the application of the rates
and charges to the owner's property for that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the
levy by filing an appeal with the Secretary of the TCSD before 5:00 p.m. on December 1,2001,
pursuant to procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the appeal of
classification or correction of errors program.
Section 10. if a property owner subject to these rates and charges believes that
payment of the rates and charges for Fiscal Year 2001-2002 would create a hardship for that
property owner during that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing a
hardship appeal with the TCSD Secretary before 5:00 p.m. on December 1,2001, pursuant to
procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the hardship appeal
program.
Section 11. The TCSD Secretary is hereby ordered to transmit or cause to be
transmitted to the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, California before August 9, 2001,
the Report and the property tax roll with such rates and charges enumerated for each parcel not
exempt therefrom; and the County Auditor is hereby designated, required, empowered,
authorized, instructed, directed and ordered to make collection of all such rates and charges as
shown on that roll and to perform any and all duties necessary therefor.
Section 12. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the levy and
collection of th~se rates and charges is exempt from CEQA pursuant to California Public
Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the
rates and charges are necessary to maintain existing improvements within the TCSD.
Section 13. The District Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula
Community Services District this 12~h day of June, 2001.
Jeffrey E. Stone, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
SS
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 2001 - was duly
adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the regular
meeting thereof, held on the 12th day of June, 2001, by the following vote of the Board of
Directors.
AYES: DIRECTORS:
NOES: DIRECTORS:
ABSENT: DIRECTORS:
EXHIBIT A
PROJECT SUMMARY
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
SERVICE LEVELS Bi C1 AND D
On July 1,2000, MuniFinancial, Inc. was retained by the City of Temecula to prepare the
Annual Levy Report for the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) for the Fiscal Year
2001-2002. Pursuant to the Community Services District Law, Division 3 of Title 6 of the
Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 61000 et seq., the TCSD
has the power to levy and collect rates and charges in order to carry on its operations and to
provide the services and facilities furnished by it.
The levy and collection of the rates and charges is accomplished by the identification and
description of each parcel within a specific service level. A Service Level is a defined area that
provides a specific service, operation and maintenance and/or program to only those parcels
contained within that service level, as follows:
Service Level B - Residential Street Li.qhts. Operations, maintenance, utility costs
and administration of all residential street lights.
Service Level C - Perimeter Landscapinq and Slope Maintenance. Operations,
maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and administration for all perimeter
landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD.
Service Level D - Refuse Collection, Recyclin.q and Street Sweepinq. Operations
and administration of the refuse and recycling program, and street sweeping
services for all single-family residential homes.
The Financial Analysis contained herein includes Service Levels B, C, and D with their total levy
budgets for Fiscal Year 2001-2002 to be as follows:
SERVICE LEVEL/LEVY BUDGET
RATELEVEL PARCELCHARGE
Service Level B $ 420,228
N/A $ 25.68
Service Level C
$ 984,696
C-1 $ 46.00
C-2 $ 89.00
C-3 $116.00
C-4 $175.00
C-5 $ 70.00
C-6 $225.00
C-7 $129.00
Service Level D $3,030,326
$172.56
TOTAL TCSD LEVY
FOR SERVICE LEVELS
B, C, AND D:
$ 4,435,250
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL
R - STREET AND ROAD MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE
DISTRICT HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, effective December 1,
1989, voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District ("TCSD"), to
provide specified services to properties within its jurisdiction.
Section 2. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the
TCSD has prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for the services furnished by it,
and has elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner,
by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, property
taxes within the TCSD in the manner prescribed by Government Code Sections 61765.2 to
61765.6, inclusive. By previous resolution, the TCSD proposed to continue such rates and
charges for the maintenance of streets and roads for Fiscal Year 2001-2002.
Section 3. Pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, the TCSD caused a
written report ("Report") to be prepared and filed with the Secretary of the TCSD, which Report
contains a description of each parcel of real property and the proposed amount of the rates and
charges for Fiscal Year 2001-2002. The Report is based upon a budget adopted by the Board
of Directors for the proposed services for specific areas where such services are provided,
including necessary staff and administrative expenses. A summary or the Report containing the
proposed rates and charges is attached hereto as Exhibit A, entitled "Project Summary", and
incorporated herein by this reference. A copy of the Report is on file in the office of the
Secretary of the TCSD, and is available for public inspection.
Section 4. By previous resolution, the Board of Directors acknowledged the filing
of the Report, and appointed a time and place for a public hearing on the Report and the
proposed rates and charges. Notice of the public hearing was mailed and published as required
by law and affidavits of publication and mailing are on file with the Secretary of the TCSD.
Section 5. On June 12, 2001, the Board of Directors conducted a public hearing
on the Report and the proposed rates and charges. At the public hearing, the Board of Directors
heard and considered all oral and written objections, protests and comments by any interested
person concerning the Report, the proposed rates and charges, and the method of collection of
such rates and charges.
Section 6. The Board of Directors hereby finds that, based on the Report and
the District budget, the rates and charges as set out on Exhibit "A" do not exceed the reasonabie
cost of the services to be provided by the TCSD for Fiscal Year 2001-2002.
R:ksnfithb~Assessn~ntsXLll-02 Reso Rates & Charges.doc 06/12/01
Section 7. The Board of Directors hereby overrules any and all objections and
protests and adopts the rates and charges for the street and road maintenance services for
Fiscal Year 2001-2002 as set out on Exhibit "A" for the services to be provided by the TCSD for
Fiscal Year 2001-202.
Section 8. The TCSD shall collect such rates and charges at the same time and
in the same manner and by the same persons as, together with and not separately from, the
property taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shall be delinquent at the
same time and thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes.
All laws applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not
limited to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and
redemption, are applicable to these rates and charges, except for California Revenue and
Taxation Code Section 4831. However, if for the first year the charge is levied, the real property
to which the charge relates has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value,
or if a lien of a bona fide encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior
to the date on which the first installment of such taxes appear on the roll, then the charge shall
not result in a lien against the property, but instead shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for
collection.
Section 9. If a property owner subject to these rates and charges questions the
classification of the owner's property for Fiscal Year 2001-2002, or claims that an error has been
made with respect to the implementation of the rates and charges or the application of the rates
and charges to the owner's property for that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the
levy by filing an appeal with the Secretary of the TCSD before 5:00 p.m. on December 1,2001,
pursuant to procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the appeal of
classification or correction of errors program.
Section 10. If a property owner subject to these rates and charges believes that
payment of the rates and charges for Fiscal Year 2001-2002 would create a hardship for that
property owner during that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing a
hardship appeal with the TCSD Secretary before 5:00 p.m. on December 1,2001, pursuant to
procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the hardship appeal
program.
.Section 11. The TCSD Secretary is hereby ordered to transmit or cause to be
transmitted to the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, California before August 9, 2001,
the Report and the property tax roll with such rates and charges enumerated for each parcel not
exempt therefrom; and the County Auditor is hereby designated, required, empowered,
authorized, instructed, directed and ordered to make collection of all such rates and charges as
shown on that roll and to perform any and all duties necessary therefor.
Section 12. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the levy and
collection of these rates and charges is exempt from CEQA pursuant to California Public
Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the
rates and charges are necessary to maintain existing improvements within the TCSD.
Section 13. The District Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula
Community Services District this 12th day of June, 2001.
Jeffrey E. Stone, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OFTEMECULA)
SS
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 2001- was duly
adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the regular
meeting thereof, held on the 12th day of June, 2001, by the following vote of the Board of
Directors.
AYES: DIRECTORS:
NOES: DIRECTORS:
ABSENT: DIRECTORS
EXHIBIT A
PROJECT SUMMARY
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
SERVICE LEVEL R
On July 1,2000, MuniFinancial, Inc. was retained by the City of Temecula to prepare the
Annual Levy Report for the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) for the Fiscal Year
2001-2002. Pursuant to the Community Services District Law, Division 3 of Title 6 of the
Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 61000 et seq., the TCSD
has the power to levy and collect rates and charges in order to carry on its operations and to
provide the services and facilities furnished by it.
The levy and collection of the rates and charges is accomplished by the identification and
description of each parcel within a specific service level. A Service Level is a defined area that
provides a specific service, operation and maintenance and/or program to only those parcels
contained within that service level, as foIIows:
Service Level R - Streets and Roads. Construction, installation, and maintenance
of streets and roads.
The Financial Analysis contained herein includes the Service Level R total levy budget for Fiscal
Year 2001-2002 to be as follows:
SERVICE LEVEL/LEVY BUDGET
RATE LEVEL PARCELCHARGE
Service Level R $12,687
TOTAL TCSD LEVY
FOR SERVICE LEVEL R:
$12,687
R-1 Improved $115.26
R-1 Unimproved $ 57.64
R-2 Improved $121.92
R-2 Unimproved $ 60.96
CITY OF TEMECULA
ENGINEER'S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT
Temecula Community Services District
(TCSD)
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
INTENT MEETING:
PUBLIC HEARING:
April 24, 2001
June 12, 2001
Corporate Office Regional Offices
28765 Single Oak Drive * San Diego, CA * Jacksonville, FL
Suite 200 · Anaheim, CA · Kansas City, MO
Temecula, CA 92590 · Lancaster, CA · Phoenix, AZ
Tel: (909) 699-3990 · Industry, CA · Seattle, WA
Tel: (800) 755-MUNI (6864) · Oakland, CA · Washington, DC
Fax: (909) 699-3460
www.muni.com
ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
Establishment of Annual Rates and Charges for the:
Temecula Community Services District (TCSD)
City of Temecula
Riverside County, State of California
This Report and the information contained therein reflect the proposed budget for each
of the various services provided by the District and the rates and charges applicable to
those services as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention.
Reference is hereby made to the Riverside County Assessor's maps for a detailed
description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned
respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the Board of Directors of the
Temecula Community Services District.
Dated this day of ., 2001.
MuniFinancial
District Engineer
On Behalf of the City of Temecula and
The Temecula Community Services District
By:
Jim McGuire
Project Manager, District Administration Services
By:
Richard Kopecky
R. C. E. # 16742
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1
II. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS .............................................................................. 3
A. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICTAND SERVICES ........................................... 3
B. BUDGETAND LEVY SUMMARY ................................................................................... 3
C. DISTRICT SERVICES AND CHARGES ........................................................................... 5
III. CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT .............................................................................. 10
A. RECENT MODIFICATIONS TO THE DISTRICT (PRIOR TO 2001/2002) ........................... 10
B. MODIFICATIONS OF THE DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001/2002 ............................... 10
IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS ............................................................................................ 15
V. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT .......................................................................... 18
APPENDIX A -- 2001/2002 COLLECTION ROLL ....................................................... 20
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
INTRODUCTION
Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula ("City"), effective December 1, 1989,
voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services-District
("District") to provide specified services to properties within its jurisdiction
previously provided by the County of Riverside ("County"). The boundary of the
District is coterminous with the City boundary and includes all parcels within the
City with the City Council acting as the Board of Directors ("Board") for the
District. The District collects property-related fees and charges ("Charges") in
order to provide services and maintain the improvements within the District. The
District was formed, and Charges are set and established, pursuant to the
Community Services District Law, Title 6, Division 3 of the California Government
Code ("CSD Law").
Each fiscal year, an Annual Levy Report is prepared, filed and approved by the
Board. This Annual Levy Report describes the District, any changes to the
District and the proposed Charges for the fiscal year. The Charges contained in
the Annual Levy Report are based on the historical and estimated cost to service
properties within the District. The services provided by the District and the
corresponding costs are budgeted and charged as separate Service Levels and
include all expenditures, deficits, surpluses, and revenues. Each parcel is
charged for the services provided to the parcel.
The District provides residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope
maintenance, and refuse collection in numerous residential developments as
well as road improvement and maintenance within specified areas of the District.
Pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the District has
prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for residential street lighting
(Service Level B), perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance (Service Level
C), refuse collection (Service Level D), and road improvement and maintenance
(Service Level R) services furnished by the District, and has elected to have
these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the
same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from,
its general taxes in the manner prescribed by Government Code Sections
61765.2 to 61765.6, inclusive.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, this Engineer's Annual Levy
Report ("Report") is prepared and presented to the Board to prescribe Service
Level B, Service Level C, Service Level D and Service Level R Rates and
Charges for the parcels and territories within the District.
The word "parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property
assigned its own Assessment Number by the Riverside County Assessor's
Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Assessment Numbers and
MuniFinancial Page 1
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
specific Fund Numbers, to identify on the tax roll, properties charged for District
services.
A Public Hearing is held each year before the Board to allow the public an
opportunity to hear and be heard regarding the District. Following consideration
of all public comments and written protests at the noticed Public Hearing, and
review of the Engineer's Annual Levy Report, the Board may order amendments
to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the
Report, and confirmation of the Charges, the Board shall order the levy and
collection of Charges for Fiscal Year 2001/2002. In such case, the levy
information will be submitted to the Riverside County Auditor/Controller, and
included as Charges on the property tax roll for the various services provided in
Fiscal Year 2001/2002.
MuniFinancial Page
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
I1.
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
General Description of the District and Services
The boundary of the District is coterminous with the City boundary, and
includes all parcels within the City of Temecula. The District provides certain
property related services and improvements consisting of four (4) separate
and distinct services referred to as Service Levels. Each parcel within the
District is charged proportionately for only those services attributable to the
parcel. Each Service Level has differing costs depending upon the services
provided. All parcels identified within a Service Level share in the cost of the
service. The costs associated with the service are proportionately spread
among all properties within that Service Level to which the service is
provided. Services and improvements provided through the District include
residential street lighting; perimeter landscape maintenance and slope
protection; a refuse and recycling collection program; and road improvement
construction and maintenance. The Service Levels are identified as follows:
· Residential Street Lighting
· Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance
· Refuse Collection
· Road Improvement and Maintenance
B. Budget and Levy Summary
Each Service Level provides different and specific services and
improvements to various parcels within the District. Only the parcels that the
services and improvements are provided for are included in each of the
Service Levels. The "Total Levy Units" and the resulting "Charge Per Levy
Unit" (shown in Table I), reflect a method of apportionment that most fairly
proportions the costs of the services to the parcels in that Service Level. The
"Total Levy Units" for Service Levels B, C, and D is based on a per parcel
count. For Service Level R, levy units are based on a Parcel Development
Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel count, but makes a distinction
between developed and undeveloped parcels. For a more complete
description of the methods used for calculating the "Total Levy Units" used for
each Service Level, please refer to (Section V), Method of Apportionment.
MuniFinancial Page 3
0
'E'E'E a
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Repod
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
C. District Services and Charges
Service Level B, Residential Street Lighting -- includes all developed
single family residential parcels and residential vacant pamels for which the
District provides on-going servicing, operation, and maintenance of local
street lighting improvements. The current rate and charges for Service Level
B is $25.68 per residential pamel and shall be applied to parcels within the
following Tracts and subdivisions for Fiscal Year 2001/2002.
Service Level B Tracts
11087-01 20130-01 21082-04 22593-00 23101-04 23371-05 24185-01
11087-02 20130-02 21340-00 22593-01 23101-05 23371-06 24185-02
12189-01 20130-03 21340-01 22593-02 23101-06 23371-07 24186-01
12189-02 20130-04 21340-02 22627-00 23125-00 23371-08 24186-02
12189-03 20130-05 21340-03 22627-01 23125-01 23371-09 24186-03
12189-04 20130-06 21340-04 22715-00 23125-02 23371-10 24186-F
12189-05 20153-00 21340-05 22715-01 23125-03 23371-11 24188-01
12189-06 20154-00 21340-06 22715-02 23126-00 23371-14 24232-00
12189-07 20319-00 21340-07 22716-00 23128-00 23483-00 25004-01
13060-01 20643-00 21430-01 22716-01 23142-00 24131-00 27827-00
13060-02 20644-00 21561-00 22716-02 23143-02 24131-01 27827-01
13060-03 20703-01 21672-01 22716-03 23143-03 24131-02 27827-02
13060-04 20703-02 21672-02 22716-04 23143-04 24131-03 27827-03
13060-05 20703-03 21672-03 22761-00 23173-00 24132-00 28309-00
13060-06 20735-01 21672-04 22762-00 23173-01 24132-01 28480-00
13060-07 20735-02 21673-00 22786-00 23173-02 24133-00 28482-00
13060-08 20735-03 21673-01 22915-00 23173-03 24133-01 28482-01
18518-00 20735-04 21673-02 22915-01 23173-04 24133-02 28482-02
18518-01 20735-05 21673-03 22915-02 23174-01 24133-03 28482-03
18518-02 20735-06 21674-00 22915-03 23174-02 24133-04 28503-00
18518-03 20735-07 21674-01 22916-00 23174-03 24133-05 28510-00
18583-00 20735-08 21674-02 22916-01 23174-04 24134-00 28510-01
19872-00 20735-09 21674-03 22916-02 23174-05 24134-01 28510-02
19872-01 20848-00 21675-00 22916-03 23174~06 24134-02 28510-03
19872-02 20879-00 21675-01 22962-00 23177-00 24134-03 28526-00
19872-03 20879-01 21675-02 23100-01 23220-00 24135-00 28553-01
19872-04 20882-00 21675-03 23100-02 23267-00 24135-01 28553-F
19872-05 20882-01 21675-04 23100-03 23267-01 24135-02 28810-00
19939-00 20882-02 21675-05 23100-04 23267-02 24135-03 29033-00
19939-01 20882-03 21675-06 23100-05 23267-03 24182-01 29036-00
19939-02 20987-00 21760-00 23100-06 23267-04 24182-02 29286-00
20079-00 21067-00 21765-00 23100-07 23371-00 24182-03 PM 26488
20079-01 21082-00 22148~00 23100-08 23371-01 24182-04 PM 27493
20079-02 21082-01 22203-00 23101-01 23371-02 24183-01 PM 28122
20079-03 21082-02 22204-00 23101-02 23371-03 24184-01
20130-00 21082-03 22208-00 23101-03 23371-04 24184-F
MuniFinancial Page 5
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
Service Level C, Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance --
includes all developed single family residential parcels and residential vacant
parcels for which the District provides on-going servicing, operation, and
maintenance of perimeter landscaped areas and slopes within the public
right-of-ways and dedicated easements adjacent to and associated with
certain tracts and subdivisions. The level of maintenance required within
these tracts and subdivisions vary depending on operating costs, and
therefore six (6) rate levels have been established within Service Level C.
The rate and charges for each of the six service levels in Service Level C are
as follows:
· The approved rate for C-1 is $ 46.00 and is currently charged $46.00
· The approved rate for C-2 is $ 89.00 and ~s currently charged $89.00
· The approved rate for C-3 is $116.00 and ~s currently charged $116.00
· The approved rate for C-4 is $175.00 and ~s currently charged $175.00
· The approved rate for C-5 is $ 70.00 and ~s currently charged $70.00
The approved rate for C-6 is $225.00 and ~s currently charged $225.00
· The approved rate for C-7 is $129.00 and is currently charged $129.00
The current rate and charges for Service Level C is per residential parcel and
shall be applied to parcels within the following Tracts and subdivisions for
Fiscal Year 2001/2002.
Service Level C Tracts
Tract Name
PRESLEY DEVELOPMENT 23267-00
26861-02
RANCHO SOLANA 22593-00
THE VINEYARDS 20879-00
MONTE VISTA 28309-00
Rate Level C-1
Tract Numbers
23267-01 23267-02 23267-03 23267-04
26861-03
22593-01 22593-02
20879-01
26861-00 26861-01
MuniFir~anci~l Page 6
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/5002
Tract Name
MORRISON HOMES
RIDGEVIEW
WINCHESTER CREEK
WOODCREST COUNTRY
Rate Level C-2
Tract Numbers
22148-00
20735-07 20735-08 20736K)9 21764-00
20130-00 20130-01 20130-02 20130-03
21340-00 21340-01 21340-02 21340-03
21340-07
21561-00 22208-00
27493-PM
20130-04 20130-05 20130-06
21340-04 21340-05 21340-06
Tract Name
MARTINIQUE 23128-00
RANCHO HIGHLANDS 20643-00 20644-00 21760-00
SADDLEWOOD 18518-00 18518-01 18518-02
VINTAGE HILLS 22715-00 22715-01 22715-02
22716-04 22915-00 22915-01
22916-02 22916-03 28122-PM
LENNAR 29286-00
Rate Level C-3
Tract Numbers
22203-00 22204-00 22761-00 22762-00
18518-03
22716-00 22716-01 22716-02 22716-03
22915-02 22915-03 22916~0 22916K)1
Rate Level C-4
Tract Name Tract Numbers
BARCLEY ESTATES 25004-01
MEADOW VIEW 21765-00
SIGNET SERIES 20882-00 20882-01 20882-02 20882-03
TRADEWINDS 23125-00 23125-01 23125-02 23125-03
VILLAGE GROVE 21672-01 21672-02 21672-03 21672-04 21673-00 21673-01 21673-02
21673-03 21674-00 21674-01 21674-02 21674-03 21675-00 21675-01
21675-02 21675-03 21675-04 21675-05 21675-06
CROWNE HILL 23143-02 23143-03 23143-04
MuniFinancial Page 7
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
Tract Name
TEMEKU HILLS
Rate Level C-5
Tract Numbers
23371-00 23371-01 23371-02 23371-03 23371-04 23371-05 23371-06
23371-07 23371-08 23371-09 23371-10 23371-11 23371-14 23371-15
28482-00 28482-01 28482-02 28482-03 28526-00 29033-00
Tract Name
WOODSIDE
Rate Level C-6
Tract Numbers
28510-00 28510-01 28510-02 28510-03
Tract Name
VAIL RANCH
Rate Level .C-7
Tract Numbers
23173-00 23173-01 23173-02 23173-03 23173-04 23174-01 23174-02
23174-03 23174-04 23174-05 23174-06 28480-00 28832-00
Service Level D, Refuse Collection -- provides for the operation and
administration of the refuse collection program including recycling and street
sweeping services for all single family residential homes within the District.
The current rate and charges for Service Level D is $172.56 per single family
residential home (developed residential parcel) and will be applied to all
parcels that have been identified as developed residential homes. Pursuant
to Proposition 218, the District may increase the rate &nd charges for this
service after conducting an additional protest hearing on the matter. Mailed
ballot proceedings are not required to establish Service Level D rates and
charges. The Vail Ranch area currently utilizes a different Refuse provider
than other areas of the City. With the recent inclussion of Vail Ranch to the
TCSD, properties within Service Level D are identified as D-2 (Vail Ranch)
and D-1 (the remainder of the City) although the rates and charges are the
same.
MuniFinancial Page 8
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
Service Level R, Roads -- provides funding for construction, improvement,
service and maintenance of public streets and roads throughout the District.
The services provided may include, but are not limited to: renovation or
restoration due to damage; flood and drainage control; repairs and re-
grading; and upgrades of the existing areas as required for unpaved roads.
All parcels identified within Service Level R, share in the cost of the services
provided. The costs associated with the services are proportionately spread
among all parcels within various areas (rate levels) of the Service Level R.
Service Level R currently has two (2) rate levels. The level of maintenance
required within these two (2) areas vary due to operating costs, and therefore
separate rate levels have been established. Only the parcels within each of
the two (2) boundary areas will be charged for the costs associated with
servicing and maintaining the roads and streets in the area.
Rate Level R-I --The parcels within this rate level consists of seventy-six
(76) assessable pamels that have direct access to roads or streets that
are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides
funding for servicing and maintenance of: Nicolas Road; Greenwood
Lane; Liefer Road; Gatlin Road; Pala Vista. A total of 1.068 miles of roads
are serviced and maintained in this area.
Rate Level R-2 --The parcels within this rate level consists of sixty-five
(65) assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that
are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides
funding for servicing and maintenance of: Ormsby Road; Santiago Road;
Lolita Road; and John Warner Road. A total of 1.003 miles of roads are
serviced and maintained in this area.
MuniFinancial Page 9
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
III. CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT
Changes or modifications to the District structure, if any, could include, but are
not limited to: changes or expansion in the existing improvements or in the types
of services provided; addition of new services or Service Levels; restructuring of
the current Service Levels; inclusion of parcels into the District or Service Levels;
or revisions in the method of apportionment. Changes or modifications within the
District that may affect the levy are outlined in the following.
A. Recent Modifications to the District (Prior to 200112002)
On March 4, 1997, the voters of Temecula approved a Special Tax to fund
citywide community services. This Special Tax replaced two existing Service
Levels, previously charged through the Community Services District.
· Community Services, Parks, and Recreation -- that provided for the
maintenance, service and operation of all public parks and recreation
services within the City.
Service Level A, Arterial Street Lighting and Medians -- that provided
servicing, operation, and maintenance of traffic signals, street lighting and
landscaped medians along arterial streets.
Beginning in Fiscal Year 1997/1998 these two Service Levels were replaced
by the Special Tax and are no longer charged through the District.
Modifications of the District for Fiscal Year 2001/2002
The most notable modification to the District for Fiscal Year 2001/2002 is
related to the addition of improvements and expansion of existing services as
a result of new development. When a new residential tract is developed, the
District accepts additional improvements for maintenance and servicing.
Along with acceptance of the improvements, the parcels within those tracts
are included in the appropriate Service Levels. The improvements and
services for Service Levels B and C are typically tract or development specific
and therefore, all parcels within a tract or development are included in these
two Service Levels when the District accepts the improvements. Additionally,
individual residential parcels are included in Service Level D when a new
single family residential unit is identified.
MuniFinancial Page 10
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
Service Level B
Inclusions to Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting) include the 2,783
residential parcels within the following Tracts:
Tract Total Number of
Number Parcels Units
23100-08 30 21
23173-00 132 130
23173-01 170 164
23173-02 178 175
23173-03 83 81
23173-04 148 144
23174-01 191 189
23174-02 119 114
23174-03 80 75
23174-04 134 130
Tract Total Number of
Number Parcels Units
23174-05 129 125
23174-06 229 220
23371-00 74 74
23371-08 88 84
24182-03 121 115
24182-04 109 103
24183-01 82 76
24188-01 78 67
28480-00 72 70
28482-00 87 87
Tract Total Number
Number Parcels Units
28482-01 92 90
28482-02 86 84
28482-03 115 109
28526-00 47 44
28810-00 81 80
29033-00 71 70
29036-00 24 24
29286-00 38 38
The rates and charges to be applied to the above referenced tracts and
subdivision were previously approved by the property owners and adopted by
the Board for inclusion.
The number of units for each of the tracts referenced for inclusion in Service
Level B represent the total number of residential parcels and lots within that
tract. Although these tracts have been fully subdivided or a tract map has
been approved, the actual Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN's) for each of
the individual residential parcels may not have been established by the
County Assessor's Office. In such cases, the APN's currently recognized by
the County are assigned and charged for the number of residential lots
associated with each parcel within the tract. The new APN's for each of the
individual residential parcels and lots are expected to be established by the
time the levy is submitted to the County, but if not, the existing APN's will be
charged based on the number of residential lots associated with each APN.
Service Level C
Inclusions to Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes) for Fiscal
Year 2001/2002 are identified in the following.
Rate Level #1 -- No New Tracts
Rate Level #2 -- No New Tracts
MuniFinancial Page 11
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
Rate Level # 3 -- Lennar Homes
Tract Number of
Number Total Parcels Units
29286-00 38
The rates and charges to be applied to the above referenced tract and
subdivision were previously approved by the property owners and adopted by
the Board for inclusion. Properties within this tract are subject to a rate and
charge of $116.00 per parcel (residential lot) and will be charged this Rate
Level beginning Fiscal Year 2001/2002.
Rate Level # 4 -- Crowne Hill (Richmond America)
Tract ~ef Tract ~of
Number Total Pe~:e~s Units Nurrber Totsl Parcels Units
231434~2 72 64 2314.3-03 114 105
Tract Number of
N~'nber Tota~ I-~,~s Units
23143-04 87 80
The rates and charges to be applied to the above referenced tracts and
subdivision were previously approved by the property owners and adopted by
the Board for inclusion. Properties within these tracts are subject to a rate ·
and charge of $175.00 per parcel (residential lot) and will be charged this
Rate Level beginning Fiscal Year 2001/2002.
Rate Level # 5 -- Temeku Hills
Tract Icz~d~a'~
23371-(36 30 28
Tract ~o~
N~,~ To~al P'a~cels Units
23371-07 48 45
23371-08 88 84
23371~39 69 67
23371-10 27 25
23371-11 116 112
23371-14 24 24
23371-15 12 0
Tract Nmlber of
N~ Tolal I-~,,,Gs Units
2848200 87 87
28482~1 92 90
28482-Q~ 86 84
28482-03 115 109
285~680 47 44
29~ 71 70
The rates and charges to be applied to the above referenced tracts and
subdivision were previously approved by the property owners and adopted by
the Board for inclusion. Properties within these tracts are subject to a rate
and charge of $70.00 per parcel (residential lot) and will be charged this Rate
Level beginning Fiscal Year 2001/2002.
MuniFinancial Page 12
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
Rate Level # 6 -- Campos Verde (Woodside)
Nmt=~ Tetal F,=u~ Units Nu, i~ Total
The rates and charges to be applied to the above referenced tracts and
subdivision were previously approved by the property owners and adopted by
the Board for inclusion. Properties within these tracts are subject to a rate
and charge of $225.00 per parcel (residential lot) and will be charged this
Rate Level beginning Fiscal Year 2001/2002.
Rate Level # 7 -- Vail Ranch
N~d~er of Tract
Total P~,..~s Units N~nber
132 130 23174-01
170 164 23174-82
178 175 2317403
83 81 23174-04
146 144 23174-05
Nwnber ~
To~I Patrols Units
191 189
119 114
8O 75
134 130
129 125
The rates and charges to be applied to the above referenced tracts and
subdivision were previously approved by the property owners of Vail Ranch
and adopted by the Board for inclusion. Properties within these tracts are
subject to a rate and charge of $129.00 per parcel (residential lot).
The number of units for each of the tracts referenced for inclusion in Service
Level C represent the total number of residential parcels and lots within that
tract. Although these tracts have been fully subdivided or a tract map has
been approved, the actual Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN's) for each of
the individual residential parcels may not have been established by the
County Assessor's Office. In such cases, the APN's currently recognized by
the County are assigned and charged for the number of residential lots
associated with each parcel within the tract. The new APN's for each of the
individual residential parcels and lots are expected to be established by the
time the levy is submitted to the County, but if not, the existing APN's will be
charged based on the number of residential lots associated with each APN.
MuniFinancial Page 1 3
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
Service Level D
A total of 2,781 newly developed residential parcels have been identified and
added to Service Level D (Refuse Collection) for Fiscal Year 2001/2002. Of
the total 2,781 newly developed residential parcels, 1,150 are being included
in Rate D-1. The remaining 1,631 newly developed residential parcels are
from the Vail Ranch area and are identified as Rate Level D-2. New single
family residential units are identified each year and included in Service Level
D based on updated County Assessor's data, City building permits and the
waste hauler's updated service records.
The actual cost per household last year for this service was $172.56. For
Fiscal Year 2001/2002, the proposed rate and charge is unchanged at
$172.56 for actual service costs, as provided in the City's franchise
agreement with the contracted waste hauler (CR&R). Waste Management
Inland Valley was previously contracted as the waste hauler for the Vail
Ranch area and will continue to provide the contracted services for the area
at the same rate of $172.56.
Service Level R
There are no new inclusions to Service Level R (Roads), proposed for the
current fiscal year.
MuniFinancial Page 14
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
IV.
DISTRICT BUDGETS
The Tables on the next three (3) pages shows the District budget for Fiscal Year
2001/2002.
2001/2002 DISTRICT BUDGET
Temecula Community Services District
Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 2002
No. 192 193 194 t95 District
PERSONNEl. SERVICES
Seiaries and Wages 5100 $3,373 $174,121 $26,904 $0 $204,398
Deferred Compensation 5101 0 0 0 0 0
PERS Retirement 5102 0 0 0 0 0
State Unemployment 5103 0 0 0 0 0
Medicare FICA 5104 0 0 0 0 0
Auto Allowance 5106 0 0 0 0 0
Life Insurance 5108 0 0 0 0 0
Unemployment TrainioR Tax 5109 0 0 0 0 0
Disability Insurance 5t10 0 0 O 0 0
Workers Compensation 5112 0 0 0 0 0
Health Insurance 5113 0 0 0 0 0
Dental fesurance 5114 0 0 0 0 0
Medical Reimbursement 5115 0 0 0 0 0
Vision Insurance 5116 0 0 0 0 0
Chid Care Reimbursement 5117 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary Help 5118 0 0 0 0 0
Part-Time (Proiect) 5119 0 9,560 0 0 9,860
Part-Time Retirement 5120 0 0 0 0 0
Overtime WaRes 5121 0 900 0 0 900
Compensated Absences 5126 0 0 0 0 0
Life & Accident Insurance 5190 0 0 0 0 0
Subtotal (Personnel Se~ices) $3,373~ $184,881, $26,904 $0 $215,158
MuniFinancial Page 15
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
2001/2002 DISTRICT BUDGET
Temecula Community Services District
Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 2002
No. 192 t93 t94 t95 District
OPERATIONS AND NIAINTE NANCE
Repair & Maim. - Facilities 5212 $0 $92,915 ~0 $0 $92,915
Repair & Maintenance-Vehicles 5214 0 0 0 0 0
Maintenance Supplies 5218 0 0 0 0 0
Office Supplies 5220 0 0 0 0 0
Pdntinq 5222 0 0 15,471 0 15,471
Leqal Dccumentst~laps 5224 0 0 0 0 0
Election Costs (Offset by developer deposits} 5225 12,000~ 12~000 0 0 24r000
Dues and Memberships 5226 0 0 2,610 0 2,610
Publications 5228 0 0 0 0 6
Posta~ and Packaging 5230 0 0 0 0 0
Properly Tax Admin Fees 5231 2~800 1,200 3,000 80 7~080
Rent - Facilities 5234 0 0 0 0 0
Rent - Equipment 5238 0 0 0 0 0
Equipment Lease 5239 0 0 0 0 0
MuniFinancial Page 16
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
2001/2002 DISTRICT BUDGET
Temecula Community Services District
Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 2002
NO. 192 193 t94 195 District
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
Waste Haurinq 5315 $0 $0 $3,030,326 ~0 $3,030,326
Street Li~hgn~l 5319 5961100 0 0 0 596,100
rnsurence 5330 0 0 0 0 0
Vehicles 5335 0 0 0 0 0
Information Systems 5340 0 0 ~ 0 0 0
MuniFinancial Page 17
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
As in past years, the cost to provide services within the District will be fairly
distributed among each eligible property.
The following is the formula used to calculate each property's District charges by
the per parcel (residential lot) method.
Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting); Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping
and Slopes); and Service Level D (Citywide Recycling and Refuse):
Total Balance to Levy/Total Parcels (in Service Level) = Parcel Charge
The Rate Per Levy Unit for Service Level R is based on a Parcel Development
Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel charge, but makes a distinction
between developed and undeveloped parcels.
Service Level R (Roads):
Parcel Development Units = 1.0 for Developed Parcels
Parcel Development Units = 0.5 for Undeveloped Parcels
Total Balance to Levy/Total Parcel PDU (in rate Level) = Parcel Charge
The following tables reflect the levy calculations for each Service Level.
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL B
Parcel Charge per Parcel
Property Type Unit X Parcel = Charge Multiplier
Single Family Residential 1.00 $25.68 $25.68 Per Parcel
Sin~lle Family Vacant 1.00 $25.68 $25.68 Per Parcel
MuniFinancial Page 18
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL C
Parcel Charge per Parcel
Property Type Unit X Parcel = Charge Multiplier
Single Family Residential Rate C-1 1.00 $46.00 $46.00 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate C-2 1.00 89.00 89.00 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate C-3 1.00 116.00 116.00 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate C-4 1.00 175.00 175.00 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate C-5 1.00 70.00 70.00 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate C-6 1.00 225.00 225.00 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate C-7 1.00 $129.00 $129.00 Per Parcel
Note: Rate Level C-7 has been established for Fiscal Year 2001/2002 due to the additon of the Vail
Ranch annexation to the City.
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL D
Parcel Charge per Parcel
Property Type Unit X Parcel = Charge Multiplier
Single Family Residential Rate D-1 1.00 $172.56 $172.56 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate D-2 1.00 $172.56 $172.56 Per Parcel
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL R
Parcel Charge Parcel
Property Type Unit X per Unit = Charge Multiplier
Single Family Residential Rate R-1 1.00 $115.26 $115.26 Per Parcel
Single Family Vacant Rate R-1 0.50 115.26 57.64 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate R-2 1.00 121.92 121.92 Per Parcel
Single Family Vacant Rate R-2 0.50 $121.92 $60.96 Per Parcel
MuniFinancial Page 19
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
Appendix A -- 2001/2002 COLLECTION ROLL
Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as
shown on the County Assessor's map for the year in which this report is prepared.
A listing of pamels within this District, along with the charges, has been submitted to
the City Clerk and, by reference, is made part of this report.
MuniFinancial Page 20
ITEM 5
A P P R OVAI..~I..~/~ -,~
CITY A'I-rORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC~E
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council/Temecula Community Services District
Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager
June 12, 2001
Adoption of Annexation Agreements between the City of Temecula and the County
of Riverside for Median Maintenance (Agreement No. 1), Tax Reimbursement
(Agreement No. 2), and Sales Tax Revenue Sharing, In Association with the
Finalization of the Vail Ranch Annexation [PA00-0021]
PREPARED BY: John De Gange, GIS Administrator
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 That the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. TCSD 2001-__
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TECECULA
COMMUNITY SERICES DISTRICT APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT
ENTITLED "VAIL RANCH ANNEXATION AGREEMENT NO.'I (MEDIAN
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT) BETVVEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT AND THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE"
1.2 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-._
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "VAIL RANCH
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT NO. 2 (TAX REIMBURSEMENT) BETVVEEN THE
CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE"
1.3 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-._.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "SALES TAX REVENUE
SHARING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE
CITY OF TEMECULA (FIRST DISTRICT)
R:~PLANNING%ANNEXATN\Vail Annexation Agreements. CC.doc
1
BACKGROUND: With the approval of the Vail Ranch annexation on November 16, 2000 by the
Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) it was determined that prior to the annexation being
finalized various agreements between the City and the Countywould have to be reached. Within
the discussions between the County and the City at a series of meetings it was determined three
formal agreements requiring approval by the Board of Supervisors and the City Council would need
to be established. These agreements address median maintenance issues, reimbursement of taxes
which will be collected by the County between the time that the annexation is finalized and the end
of the year, and sales tax revenue sharing for the commercial areas removed form the annexation
area which was conceptually agreed upon as part of the LAFCO approval. The Board of
Supervisors is tentatively scheduled to take action on these agreements on June 19th.
The City and the County also discussed a number of other coordination issues at these meetings. A
number of other informal agreements were established as a result; however, it was determined that
these agreements would not require approval from the City Council and the Board of Supervisors.
DISCUSSION: At this meeting staff is presenting the following three agreements which were
created from discussion between City and county staff for approval.
Agreement No. 1 - Median Maintenance
Portions of the approved annexation boundary follow the centerline of three streets which have
landscape medians within them (portions of Redhawk Parkway and a portion of Vail Ranch
Parkway). Currently, these medians are completely being maintained by CSA 143. When the
annexation is finalized the City would technically be responsible for the maintenance of half of the
width of the medians which are being split by the annexation boundary. To facilitate more efficient
maintenance of these areas the City and County (GSA 143) agreed to logically divide up the
maintenance responsibilities. In this agreement GSA 143 would continue to maintain the entire
portion of the median along Redhawk Parkway (including the half of the median which will be in the
City) and the City agrees to maintain the entire portion ofthe median area in Vail Ranch Parkv, ey
(including portions of the median which will still be within the County).
A third component of the agreement addresses the Vail Ranch monument and the associated
landscaping south of the intersection of Redhawk Parkway and Vail Ranch Parkway. This area is
privately owned by the Redhawk Golf Course, but is within the annexation boundary. Currently CSA
143 maintains this area with an easement. This agreement stipulates that, despite the fact that the
property is owned by the Redhawk Golf Course the City will take over maintenance responsibilities
of this area due to the fact that it is within the annexation boundary. The City will continue to utilize
the easement on this propertyfor maintenance purposes.
Agreement No. 2 -Tax Reimbursement
Since the annexation was approved and will be finalized after the deadline to file with the State
Board of Equalization the various tax revenues that the City is entitled to will be received by the
County. As a consequence, it was necessary for the County and the City to establish a method
where the County would reimburse the City its share of these taxes for the remaining portion of the
year where the City is actually providing services.
Sales Tax Revenue Sharin.q Agreement
As a result of the concerns raised by the County and the owner of the properties containing the
historic Vail Ranch buildings prior to LAFCO approval of the annexation, it was ultimately agreed
that this area would be removed form the annexation boundary. The primary reasons behind this
were that a significant amount of uncertainty exists relative to tentative agreements being negotiated
between the County and this property owner regarding the preservation and maintenance of these
R:~° LA N N IN G~AN N EXATN\Vail Anne~tion Agreements. CC.doc
2
buildings and the reimbursement of the property owner's costs for restoring these buildings. In
addition, the County expressed a concern that the annexation of all the commercial properties along
Highway 79(S) would eliminate any incentive for the City to attempt a future annexation of the
Redhawk area.
The City on the other hand was concerned that removal of this area from the annexation area would
deprive the City of a significant amount of the sales tax revenue which ultimately generated form this
site. The sales tax revenue from this site was being depended on to offset the cost for the provision
of services within the area. Eventually it was agreed that the area around the historic buildings
would be removed form the annexation boundary to allow the County and the property owner
sufficient time to negotiate a mutually beneficial agreement for the restoration and maintenance of
the historic buildings. Pursuant to the proposed agreement the City is to receive 50% of the sales
tax generated from the area excluded from the annexation (not including the historic buildings
themselves which the County would receive all sales tax revenue for) for up to three years or upon
the successful annexation of the Redhawk area, which ever occurs first.
Approval of the Sales Tax Sharing Agreement requires a 4/5ths ~ote of the City Council.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The environmental impacts associated with this project
were addressed by the Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1998
for the RedhawkNail Ranch annexation (PA 98-0205).
FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact associated with the annexation of the Vail Ranch area has
been addressed within a fiscal impact (FIA) analysis which estimates that the sales tax revenue
generated form the existing commercial uses within the annexation area would partially offset the
cost for the provision of services within the area with shortfall for the first five years. This shortfall
would be eliminated once the Wal-Mart development is constructed and the City begins to receive
its share of the sales tax generated from this site. In addition, the sales tax revenue generated from
the development of the Ralph's center at Highway 79(S) and Butter[ield Stage Road will also reduce
this shortfall.
Attachments:
1.1
1.2
Attachment 1
- City Council Resolution No. TCSD 2001 -
Median Maintenance Agreement - Page
Page 4
Attachment 2
City Council Resolution No. 2001 - __ Page __
Tax Reimbursement Agreement - __ Page_
1.3
Attachment 3
- City Council Resolution No. 2001 - Page __
- Sales Tax Sharing Agreement - Page__
R:~PLAN N[NG~AN NEXATN\Vail Annexation Agreements.CC.doc
3
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO.TCSD 2001-
&
Median Maintenance Agreement
R:~PLAN NiNG~AN N EXATN\Vail Annexation Agreements.CC.doc
4
RESOLUTION NO. TCSD 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT APPROVING
THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "VAIL RANCH
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT NO. I (MEDIAN MAINTENANCE
AGREEMENT) BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT AND THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE"
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES
DISTRICT HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District
does hereby find, determine and declare that:
The Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) adopted its Resolution No.
35-00 on November 16, 2000, approving the proposed reorganization designed
as LAFCO No. 2000-10-1 which included annexation to the City of Temecula of
the area generally known as Vail Ranch.
The City of Temecula, as the designated conducting authority, adopted its
Resolution No. 2001-17 on February 13, 2001 ordering the annexation. The
Annexation will be effective on July 1, 2001.
The County of Riverside, through County Service Area 143, has been
maintaining the landscaped medians and parkways with the Vail Ranch Area and
surrounding areas.
Upon the effective date of the Annexation, some median and parkway areas will
straddle the new boundary line and will be partially within the jurisdiction of the
District and partially within the boundary of the County.
In order to most efficiently provide for the maintenance of these landscaped
median and parkway areas, the District and the County have agreed to divide the
maintenance responsibilities for these areas.
The Agreement approved by this Resolution furthers the public health, safety and
general welfare of the residents of Riverside County and the City of Temecula.
Section 2. The Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District
hereby approves that certain agreement entitled "Vail Ranch Annexation Agreement No. 1
(Median Maintenance Agreement) Between the Temecula Community Services District and the
County of Riverside" and authorizes the Chairman to execute the Agreement on behalf of the
District in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Section 3.
of Directors.
The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution by the Board
R:/Resos2001/Resos 01-_ 1
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula
Community Services District this 12th day of June, 2001.
ATTEST:
President
Jeffrey E. Stone
Susan Jones, CMC
Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT)
I, Susan Jones, CMC, Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District,
Temecula California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. TCSD 01- was duly and regularly
adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services at a regular meeting
thereof held on this 12th day of June, 2001, by the following vote:
AYES:
BOARDMEMBERS:
NOES:
BOARDMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
BOARDMEMBERS:
Susan Jones, CMC
Secretary
R:/Resos2001/Resos 01-__ 2
VAIL RANCH ANNEXATION AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT NO. 1 (MEDIAN/PARKWAY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT) BETWEEN THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AND THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
THIS AGREEMENT is dated as of June 19, 2001 by and between the Temecula
Community Services District ("District") and the County of Riverside. In consideration
of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. Recitals. This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts
and purposes, which each party hereto acknowledges as true and correct:
a. The Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of
Riverside adopted its Resolution No. 35-00 on November 16, 2000, making
determinations and approving the proposed reorganization designated as LAFCO No.
2000-10-1, including concurrent annexations to the City of Temecula and the Temecula
Community Services District and concurrent detachments from the Riverside County
Waste Resources Management District, County Service Area 143 and County Service
Areas 152 of territory generally known as the Vail Ranch Specific Plan Area and more
specifically described in Exhibit A attached to LAFCO Resolution No. 35-00.
b. The City Council of the City of Temecula, as the designated
conducting authority, adopted its Resolution No. 2001-__ on February 13,2001
ordering the reorganization of the Vail Ranch Specific Plan Area, LAFCO No. 2000-10-1
to the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community Services Area and the detachment
of those areas from the Riverside County Waste Resoumes Management District, County
Service Area 143, and County Service Area 152 ("Annexation").
c. Currently, the County, through County Service Area 143, provides
for the maintenance of the landscaped medians and parkways in the Vail Ranch Area and
the surrounding areas.
d. Upon the effective date of the Annexation, some median and
parkway areas will straddle the new boundary line and will be partially in the jurisdiction
of the District and partially within the jurisdiction of the County. In order to most
efficiently provide the maintenance of these median and parkway areas, the parties have
agreed to divide the maintenance responsibilities for these areas.
e. For the purposes of this Agreement, "Maintenance Area A" is
defined as both sides of the landscaped median on Redhawk Parkway between Temecula
Creek and Vail Ranch Parkway, as more particularly described and depicted on Exhibit
A. The easterly portion of the median will be within the jurisdiction of the District and
the westerly portion will be within the jurisdiction of the County upon the effective date
of the Annexation.
653227.2 May 30, 2001 1
f. For the purposes of this Agreement, "Maintenance Area B" is
defined as the Vail Ranch monument sign area consisting of approximately 3.69 acres of
land adjacent to Vail Ranch Parkway southeasterly of the intersection of Vail Ranch
Parkway and Redhawk Parkway, as more particularly described and depicted on Exhibit
B. All of Maintenance Area B will be within the jurisdiction of the District upon the
effective date of the Annexation.
g. For the purposes of this Agreement, "Maintenance Area C" is
defined as both sides of the landscaped median on Vail Ranch Parkway between
Nighthawk Pass and Tehachapi Pass, as more particularly described and depicted on
Exhibit C. The northwesterly portion of the median will be within the jurisdiction of the
District and the southeasterly portion will be within the jurisdiction of the County upon
the effective date of the Annexation.
h. With respect to Maintenance Area A, the District warrants and
represents to the County that, as of the effective date of the Annexation, it is authorized to
go onto Maintenance Area A within the jurisdiction of the District for the purposes of
maintenance and that it has the authority to allow the County to maintain the District's
portion of Maintenance Area A on behalf of the District.
i. With respect to Maintenance Area C, the County warrants and
represents to the District that it is authorized to go onto Maintenance Area C for the
purposes of maintenance and that it has the authority to allow the District to maintain its
portion of Maintenance Area C on behalf of the County.
j. This Agreement benefits both the District and the County by
allowing for uniform and efficient maintenance of the medians and parkways.
2. Maintenance Responsibilities. County shall maintain, at its sole cost
and expense, Maintenance Area A. District shall maintain, at its sole cost and expense,
Maintenance Area B and Maintenance Area C.
a. For the purposes of this Agreement, the terms "maintain" shall
mean (i) mowing, trimming, pruning, preserving, irrigating, fertilizing and otherwise
preserving the vegetation and trees within the Maintenance Area; (ii) cleaning,
servicing, repairing and replacing the irrigation equipment, monuments or other
hardscape features installed within the Maintenance Area; (iii) removing trash and
debris from the Maintenance Area; and (iv) payment of all utilities, including, but
not limited to, water and electricity, for the Maintenance Area.
b. Each party shall maintain the Maintenance Areas for which it is
responsible in a manner consistent with the maintenance of other medians and parkway
areas maintained by the jurisdiction.
c. District hereby grants to the County a non-exclusive license to go
onto that portion of Maintenance Area A in the possession of the District for the purposes
of performing County's obligations under this Agreement.
653227.2 May30, 2001 2
d. County hereby grants to the District a non-exclusive license to go
onto that portion of Maintenance Area C in the possession of the County for the purposes
of performing District's obligations under this Agreement.
3. Transfer of CSA 143 Fund Balance for Vail Ranch Area.
Currently, the County, through County Service Area 143 imposes rates and
charges to fund the maintenance of the landscaped medians and parkways in the Vail
Ranch Area and the surrounding areas. Upon the effective date of the Annexation the
parties anticipate that CSA 143 will have funds which have been collected from
properties within the Annexation Area for the maintenance of the landscaped medians
and parkways in the Vail Ranch Area. The parties also understand and acknowledge that
following the effective date of the Annexation, CSA 143 will need to pay for the
expenses incurred prior to the Annexation for maintenance of the medians and parkways
within the Vail Ranch Area. The parties agree that following the payment of all expenses
incurred by CSA 143 for the Vail Ranch Area, the County will pay to the District the
funds remaining in CSA 143, which sum is estimated by the parties to be one hundred
ninety thousand dollars ($190,000.00). District agrees to use such funds only for the
maintenance of landscaped medians and parkways within the Annexation Area.
4. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be twenty (20) years from
the effective date of the Annexation, unless sooner terminated as provided in this
Agreement.
5. Indemnification.
a. County agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the
District, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all
claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature
which the District, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may
be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out
of the County's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to
perform under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the
negligence of the District.
b. District agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the
County, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all
claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature
which the County, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may
be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out
of the District's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to
perform under the terms of this Agreement, or which may arise from the ownership of the
Property, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the County.
6. Defaults and Remedies
a. Subject to the extensions of time set approved in writing by a
party, failure or delay by either party to perform any term or provision of this Agreement
653227.2 May30, 2001 3
constitutes a default under this Agreement. A party claiming a default (claimant) shall
give written notice of default to the other party, specifying the default complained of.
b. The claimant shall not institute proceedings against the other party
nor be entitled to damages if the other party within fourteen (14) days from receipt of
such notice immediately, with due diligence, commences to cure, correct or remedy such
failure or delay and shall complete such cure, correction or remedy within thirty (30)
days from the date of receipt of such notice. Such cure, correction and remedy shall
include payment of any costs, expenses (including attorney fees) or damages incurred by
the non-defaulting party resulting from the default or during the period of default.
c. Except as otherwise expressly stated in this Agreement, the rights
and remedies of the parties are cumulative, and the exercise by either party of one or
more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or
different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default
by the other party.
d. Any failures or delays by either party in asserting any of its rights
and remedies as to any default shall not operate as a waiver of any default or of any such
rights or remedies, or deprive either such party of its right to institute and maintain any
actions or proceedings which it may deem necessary to protect, assert or enforce any such
rights or remedies.
e. Ifa default is not fully cured by the defaulting party as provided in
this Paragraph, the defaulting party shall be liable to the other party for any damages
caused by such default, and the nondefaulting party may thereafter (but not before)
commence an action for damages against the defaulting party with respect to such
default.
f. If a default under this Agreement is not fully cured by the
defaulting party as provided in this Paragraph, the nondefaulting party at its option may
thereafter (but not before) commence an action for specific performance of terms of this
Agreement.
g. In the event litigation is filed by one party against the other to
enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the
Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses
incurred in the action.
7. Termination of Agreement. Either party may terminate this Agreement,
for any reason, as provided in this section. Termination shall be initiated by written
notice to the other party delivered on or before March 1 with the termination to take
effect on June 30 of that year.
8. Force Maieure. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this
Agreement, if the performance of any act required by this Agreement to be performed by
either District or County is prevented or delayed by reason of any act of God, strike,
lockout, labor trouble, inability to secure materials, restrictive governmental laws or
653227.2 May30, 2001 4
regulations, or any other cause (except financial inability) not the fault of the party
required to perform the act, the time for performance of the act will be extended for a
period equivalent to the period of delay and performance of the act during the period of
delay will be excused. However, nothing contained in this Section shall excuse the
prompt payment by a party as required by this Agreement or the performance of any act
rendered difficult or impossible solely because of the financial condition of the party
required to perform the act.
9. Notices to Parties Written notices, demands and communications
among the District and County, shall be sufficiently given by either by (i) personal
service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to,
Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii)
mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt
requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address
as that party may later designate by Notice:
District:
Temecula Community Services District
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Attention: Director of Community Services
County
4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor
Riverside, Ca. 92501
Attention: Chief Administrative Officer
10. Agreement Binding on Successors. This Agreement shall be binding on
and shall inure to the benefit of the successors and lawful assigns of the parties hereto.
11. Assignment. Neither Party shall assign or transfer this Agreement or any
portion thereof without the prior written consent of the other party, which consent shall
not be unreasonably withheld; provided however that either party may assign this
Agreement to a related public entity without the consent of the other.
12. Sole and Only Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the sole and only
agreement between District and County respecting the matters contained herein, except
that the parties acknowledge and agree the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community
Services District and the County have entered into other agreements concerning the
Annexation, which are designated "Vail Ranch Annexation Agreement No. 2 (Tax
Reimbursement) Between the City of Temecula and the County of Riverside," dated as of
June 19, 200 I, "Sales Tax Revenue Sharing Agreement Between the County of Riverside
and the City of Temecula (First District)," dated as of June 19, 2001, and the Master
Property Tax Agreement between the City and the County. Any agreements or
representations, either oral or written, respecting the matters discussed in this Agreement
not expressly set forth in this Agreement are null and void.
653227.2 May30, 2001 5
13. Time of Essence. Time is expressly declared to be of the essence of this
Lease.
14. Exhibits. The following exhibits are attached hereto and incorporated
herein as though set forth in full:
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Maintenance Area A
Maintenance Area B
Maintenance Area C
15. Authority to Execute. Each party hereto expressly warrants and
represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of his or
her governmental entity and warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to
bind his or her entity to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IIII
IIII
653227.2 May30, 2001 6
IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Agreement has been executed by the authorized
representatives of the parties hereto.
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
Jeffrey Stone
President
Attest:
Susan Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
653227.2 May30, 2001 7
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
James A. Venable
Chairman of the Board of Supervisors
Attest:
Gerald A. Maloney
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By:
Deputy Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
Approved as to Form:
William Katzenstein
County Counsel
By:
Joe S. Rank
Deputy County Counsel
653227.2 May 30, 2001
EXHIBIT A
MAINTENANCE AREA A
653227.2 May 30, 2001 9
EXHIBIT B
MAINTENANCE AREA B
653227.2 May30, 2001 10
X
' ::::::::::::::::::::: :.::::: :' :.
EXHIBIT C
MAINTENANCE AREA C
653227.2 May 30, 2001 1 1
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
&
Tax Reimbumement Agreement
R:~PLANNING~,NNEXATN\Vait Annexation Agreements. CC.doc
5
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT
ENTITLED "VAIL RANCH ANNEXATION AGREEMENT NO. 2
(TAX REIMBURSEMENT) BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AND THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE"
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY RESOLVES AS
FOLLOWS:
Section '1.
declare that:
The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and
The Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) adopted its Resolution No.
35-00 on November 16, 2000, approving the proposed reorganization designed
as LAFCO No. 2000-10-1 which included annexation to the City of Temecula of
the area generally known as Vail Ranch.
4
The City of Temecula, as the designated conducting authority, adopted its
Resolution No. 2001-17 on February 13, 2001 ordering the annexation. The
Annexation will be effective on July 1,2001.
The State of California requires completed annexation maps, legal descriptions
of property and other documents to be filed with the State by December 1 in
order to transfer property tax, sales tax and other tax revenues between
govemmental agencies as a result of annexations for the fiscal year beginning
the following July 1. Since LAFCO approved the Annexation in November 2000,
the transfer of property tax, sales tax and other tax revenue between the County
and the City for the Vail Ranch Annexation Area will occur after the July 1, 2001
effective date of the Annexation.
Accordingly, the County has agreed to reimburse the City for tax revenues
generated within the Annexation Area which the County receives after the
Annexation Date but which would have been allocated to the City had the
Annexation been approved at a date which would enable the City to meet the
December 1, 2000 deadline established by the State for filing completed
annexation documents.
The Agreement approved by this Resolution furthers the public health, safety and
general welfare of the residents of Riverside County and the City of Temecula.
Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves that certain
agreement entitled "Vail Ranch Annexation Agreement No. 2 (Tax Reimbursement) Between
the City of Temecula and the County of Riverside" and authorizes the Mayor to execute the
Agreement on behalf of the City in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Section 3.
Council.
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution by the City
R:/Resos2001/Reso01-_ I
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this
12th day of June, 2001.
ATTEST:
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
Susan Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify
that Resolution No. 01- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
th
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on this 12 day of June, 2001, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:/Resos2001/Reso 01-~ 2
VAIL RANCH ANNEXATION AGREEMENT NO. 2
(TAX REIMBURSEMENT) BETWEEN THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AND THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE
THIS ANNEXATION AGREEMENT NO. 2 is dated as of June 19, 2001 by
and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and the County of
Riverside. In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the
parties agree as follows:
1. Recitals. This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts
and purposes, which each party hereto acknowledges as true and correct:
a. The Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of
Riverside ("LAFCo") adopted its Resolution No. 35-00 on November 16, 2000, making
determinations and approving the proposed reorganization designated as LAFCO No.
2000-10- I, including concurrent annexations to the City of Temecula and the Temecula
Community Services District and concurrent detachments from the Riverside County
Waste Resources Management District, County Service Area 143 and County Service
Areas 152 of territory generally known as the Vail Ranch Specific Plan Area and more
specifically described in Exhibit A attached to LAFCO Resolution No. 35-00.
b. The City Council of the City of Temecula, as the designated
conducting authority, adopted its Resolution No. 2001-17 on February 13,2001 ordering
the reorganization of the Vail Ranch Specific Plan Area, LAFCO No. 2000-10o 1 to the
City of Temecula and the Temecula Community Services Area and the detachment of
those areas from the Riverside County Waste Resources Management District, County
Service Area 143, and County Service Area 152 ("Annexation").
c. The Vail Ranch Specific Plan Area to be annexed to the City of
Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District is described and depicted on
Exhibit A, "Annexation Area." Each of these exhibits is attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference as though set forth in full.
d. As part of the hearing process for the LAFCo approval of the
reorganization, the County objected to the reorganization as originally proposed because
of the financial impacts of the original proposal on certain County obligations within the
Commercial Areas. The County has been engaged in a significant effort to preserve the
historical buildings on portions of the Commercial Areas and assist in the development of
the commercial properties surrounding the historical buildings as a means of funding the
preservation efforts. While supportive of the County's efforts, the City was concerned
that a modification of the boundaries of the proposed area to be annexed to the City
would impair its ability to provide an appropriate level of municipal services to the area.
The proceedings before LAFCo were delayed for several months in order to enable the
City and the County to develop some creative solutions to their respective concerns. City
and the County have negotiated the terms of this Agreement in an effort to accommodate
644528.4 May30, 2001
the needs of the County to reduce these impacts and the need of the City to obtain
sufficient revenue from the annexation area to provide appropriate municipal services to
the area. This Agreement sets forth the agreement of the City and County with respect to
these issues.
e. The delay in the LAFCo proceedings in order to resolve the
important issues concerning the Annexation prevented the City from filing the necessary
documents with the State Board of Equalization and the County Auditor-Controller in
order to transfer certain tax revenues from the County to the City upon the effective date
of the Annexation. Accordingly, the City and County have agreed to allow the County to
continue to collect these taxes from the Annexation Area and to transfer the tax monies to
the City until such time as the State Board of Equalization and the County Auditor can
make the appropriate transfers from the County to the City.
f. This Agreement benefits both the City and the County and furthers
the public health, safety and general welfare of the City, the County and the persons
served by each governmental entity.
2. Tax Revenue Reimbursements from Annexation Area.
a. The County currently receives from properties and transactions
within the Annexation Area certain tax and state revenues based on the city or
unincorporated county area in which certain events occur. These revenues
include the following ("Tax Revenues"):
(1) Ninety two thousand two hundred eighty one dollars
($92,281.00) which amount represents, which amount
represents the City's share, pursuant to the Master Property
Tax Agreement between the County and the City, of the ad
valorem property tax revenue from all parcels within the
Annexation Area pursuant to Division 1 of the Revenue and
Taxation Code.
(2) One percent (1%) of the sales and use taxes collected by retail
businesses within the Annexation Area on taxable retail sales
pursuant to The Bradley-Bums Uniform Local Sales Tax Law
(Part 1.5 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code)
(Section 7200 et. seq.);
(3)
The City's Share of funds allocated from the Highway Users
Tax Account ("gas tax") pursuant to Chapter 3 of Division 3 of
the Streets and Highways Code (Section 2100 er seq.);
(4)
The City's Share of the Motor Vehicle License Fee pursuant to
Chapter 5 of Part 5 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation
Code (Section 11000 et. seq.);
644528.4 May 30, 2001
(5) Motor Vehicle Licensing Fees In-Lieu Tax;
(6) The City's share of the Documentary Transfer Tax pursuant to
Part 6.7 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code
(Section 1901 et. seq.);
(7) Vehicle Code fines;
(8) Riverside County Measure "A" funds;
(9) The City's share of funds allocated from the Supplemental Law
Enforcement Services Fund (the "COPS" fund) pursuant to
Chapter 6.7 of Division 3 of Title 3 of the Government Code
(Section 30061 et. seq.);
(10) California Law Enforcement Equipment Program funds
("CLEEP")
(11) ERAFReliefunderAB 1326;
(12) The City's Share of Booking Fees Reimbursements made
pursuant to Section 29550.4 of the Government Code;
(13) Off-Highway Licensing Fees;
(14) The City's Share of funds allocated from the Traffic
Congestion Relief Fund pursuant to Section 2182 of the Streets
and Highways Code;
(15) The City's Share of funds allocated from the Transportation
Investment Fund pursuant to Section 2182 of the Streets and
Highways Code; and
(16) One hundred seventy five thousand dollars ($175,000.00)
which amount represents development impact fees collected by
the County from development within the Vail Ranch for park
and recreation purposes.
b. The City, County and LAFCo are cooperating in the preparation
and filing of the necessary documents to transfer the appropriate property tax
revenue payments, sales tax revenue, and the other Tax Revenues from the
County to the City. Such transfers will not become effective until some time after
the effective date of the Annexation.
c. Until such time as the transfer of a tax applicable to the
Annexation Area from the County to the City is complete, County agrees to pay
to the City the Tax Revenues collected from the Annexation Area had the
appropriate documents for payment of the taxes to the City been completed prior
644528.4 May30, 2001
to the effective date of the Annexation. The Tax Revenues shall be paid on a
quarterly basis. No later than January 31, April 30, July 30 and October 31
County shall pay to the City the Tax Revenues received by the County during the
prior calendar quarter. Along with such payment, County shall provide City with
documentation of the tax revenue received for each applicable tax.
5. Indemnification
a. County agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold
harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and
against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability
of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may
sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of
persons, or damage to property arising out of the County's negligent or wrongful
acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of this
Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City.
b. City agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless
the County, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any
and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind
or nature which the County, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or
incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or
damage to property arising out of the City's negligent or wrongful acts or
omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement,
or which may arise from the ownership of the Property, excepting only liability
arising out of the negligence of the County.
6. Defaults and Remedies
a. Subject to the extensions of time set approved in writing by
a party, failure or delay by either party to perform any term or provision of this
Agreement constitutes a default under this Agreement. A party claiming a default
(claimant) shall give written notice of default to the other party, specifying the
default complained of.
b. The claimant shall not institute proceedings against the
other party nor be entitled to damages if the other party within fourteen (14) days
from receipt of such notice immediately, with due diligence, commences to cure,
correct or remedy such failure or delay and shall complete such cure, correction or
remedy within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such notice. Such cure,
correction and remedy shall include payment of any costs, expenses (including
attorney fees) or damages incurred by the non-defaulting party resulting from the
default or during the period of default.
c. Except as otherwise expressly stated in this Agreement, the
rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative, and the exercise by either party
of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at
644528.4 May 30, 200i
the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or
any other default by the other party.
d. Any failures or delays by either party in asserting any of its
rights and remedies as to any default shall not operate as a waiver of any default
or of any such rights or remedies, or deprive either such party of its right to
institute and maintain any actions or proceedings which it may deem necessary to
protect, assert or enforce any such rights or remedies.
e. If a default is not fully cured by the defaulting party as
provided in this Paragraph, the defaulting party shall be liable to the other party
for any damages caused by such default, and the nondefaulting party may
thereafter (but not before) commence an action for damages against the defaulting
party with respect to such default.
f. If a default under this Agreement is not fully cured by the
defaulting party as provided in this Paragraph, the nondefaulting party at its
option may thereafter (but not before) commence an action for specific
performance of terms of this Agreement.
g. In the event litigation is filed by one party against the other
to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by
the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation
expenses incurred in the action.
7. Force Maieure. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this
Agreement, if the performance of any act required by this Agreement to be performed by
either City or County is prevented or delayed by reason of any act of God, strike, lockout,
labor trouble, inability to secure materials, restrictive govemmental laws or regulations,
or any other cause (except financial inability) not the fault of the party required to
perform the act, the time for performance of the act will be extended for a period
equivalent to the period of delay and performance of the act during the period of delay
will be excused. However, nothing contained in this Section shall excuse the prompt
payment by a party as required by this Agreement or the performance of any act rendered
difficult or impossible solely because of the financial condition of the party required to
perform the act.
8. Notices to Parties Written notices, demands and
communications among the City and County, shall be sufficiently given by either by (i)
personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not
limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or
(iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt
requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address
as that party may later designate by Notice:
644528.4 May 30, 2001
City:
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Attention: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
County
County Executive Officer
County of Riverside
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, Ca. 92501
9. Agreement Binding on Successors. This Agreement shall be
binding on and shall inure to the benefit of the successors and lawfial assigns of the
parties hereto.
10. Assignment. Neither Party shall assign or trhnsfer this
Agreement or any portion thereof without the prior whtten consent of the other party,
which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld; provided however (hat either party
may assign this Agreement to a related public entity without the consent of the other.
11. Sole and Only Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the sole
and only agreement between City and County respecting the matters contained herein,
except that the parties acknowledge and agree the City of Temecula, the Temecula
Community Services District and the County have entered into other agreements
concerning the Annexation, which are designated "Vail Ranch Annexation Agreement
No. 1 (Median/Parkway Maintenance Agreement) Between the City of Temecula and the
County of Riverside," dated as of June 19, 2001, "Sales Tax Revenue Sharing Agreement
Between the County of Riverside and the City of Temecula (First District)," dated as of
June 19, 2001, and the Master Property Tax Agreement between the City and the County.
Any agreements or representations, either oral or written, respecting the matters
discussed in this Agreement not expressly set forth in this Agreement are null and void.
12.
of this Agreement.
Time of Essence. Time is expressly declared to be of the essence
13. Authority to Execute. Each party hereto expressly warrants
and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of his
or her governmental entity and warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to
bind his or her entity to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IIII
IIII
644528.4 May 30, 2001
IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Agreement has been executed by the
authorized representatives of the parties hereto.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Jeffrey Comerchero
Mayor
Attest:
Susan Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attomey
644528.4 May30, 2001
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
James A. Venable
Chairman of the Board of Supervisors
Attest:
Gerald A. Maloney
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By:
Deputy Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
Approved as to Form:
William Katzenstein
County Counsel
By:
Joe S. Rank
Deputy County Counsel
644528.4 May30, 2001
EXHIBIT A
ANNEXATION AREA
644528.4 May 30, 2001
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
&
Sales Tax Sharing Agreement
R:\PLANNING'~ANN EXATN\Vail Annexation Agreements. CC.doc
6
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT
ENTITLED "SALES TAX REVENUE SHARING AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF
TEMECULA (FIRST DISTRICT)"
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY RESOLVES AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
declare that:
The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and
The Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) adopted its Resolution No.
35-00 on November 16, 2000, approving the proposed reorganization designed
as LAFCO No. 2000-10-1 which included annexation to the City of Temecula of
the area generally known as Vail Ranch.
The City of Temecula, as the designated conducting authority, adopted its
Resolution No. 2001-17 on February 13, 2001 ordering the annexation.
County objected to the reorganization as originally proposed because of the
exclusion of the Red Hawk development from the proposed annexation, the
inclusion of the commercial property adjacent to Red Hawk and potential impacts
to the County's effort to preserve the historic Vail Ranch.
City and County agreed to resolve these differences through negotiation for the
benefit of all residents of the County and City and to allow City's annexation to
proceed.
City agreed to remove the disputed commercial areas from within the boundaries
of the annexation and to, at some future time, provide Red Hawk residents an
opportunity to consider annexing to the City.
County agreed to provide financial assistance to City to ensure the appropriate
level of municipal services to the residents of the annexation area.
The voters of California on November 3, 1998, approved Proposition No. 11
which amended Article XIII, Section 29, of the California Constitution to allow
cities and counties to enter into agreements to share sales and use tax revenues
with the approval by the legislative bodies of both parties by a two-thirds vote.
The State Legislature amended Government Code Section 55700 et seq. to
provide the option for approval of sales tax revenue sharing agreements.
R:/Resos2OO1/Resos 01-__ I
One or more retailers will be established on the Site, as defined in the
Agreement, within the unincorporated County area, and consumers residing in
the City will be purchasing tangible personal property from such retailers to the
extent that equity requires the revenues of the County to be distributed in a fair
and just manner as set forth in the Agreement approved by both the and the
County.
The Agreement approved by this Resolution furthers the public health, safety and
general welfare of the residents of Riverside County and the City of Temecula.
This Agreement has been approved by a two-thirds vote of the City Council of
the City of Temecula.
Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves that certain
agreement entitled "Sales Tax Revenue Sharing Agreement Between the County of Riverside
and the City of Temecula (First District)" and authorizes and directs the Mayor to execute the
Agreement on behalf of the City in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Section 3.
Council.
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution by the City
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this
12th day of June, 2001.
A'Fi'EST:
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
Susan Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:/Resos2001/Resos 01-_ 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify
that Resolution No. 01- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on this 12th day of June, 2001, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:/Resos2001/Resos 01-__ 3
~R¥-09-01 NED 04:10
SALES TAX REVENUE SHARING AGREEMENT BETWEEN
'I'HE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND
'filE CITY OF TEMECULA (FIRST DIS'rRICT)
THiS AGREEMENT is entered into as of this day of ,2001, by and
between the County of Riverside (hereafter the "County") and the City of Temecula (hereafter
the "City"), hereafter collectively referred to as the "Parties."
WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO), adopted it's
Resolution No. 35-00 on November 16, 2000, approving the proposed reorganization
designated as LAFCO No. 2000-10-1 which included annexation to the City of Temecula of
the area generally known as Vail Ranch; and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula, as the designated conducting authority, adopted it's
Resolution No. 2001-17 on February 13, 2001, order'rig the annexation, and
WHEREAS, County objected to the reorganization as originally proposed because of
the exclusion of the Red Hawk development from the proposed annexation, the inclusion of
commercial areas adjacent to Red Hawk and potential impacts to the County's effort to
preserve the historic Vail Ranch; and
WHEREAS, City and County agreed to resolve these differences through negotiation
for the benefit of all residents of the County and to allow City's annexation to proceed; and
WHEREAS, City agreed to remove the disputed commercial areas from within the
boundaries of the annexation and to, at some future time, provide Red Hawk residents an
opportunity to consider annexing to City; and
WHEREAS, County agreed to provide financial assistance to City to ensure the
appropriate level of municipal services to the residents of the annexation area; and
WHEREAS, the voters of California on November 3, 1998, approved Proposition No.
11 which amended Article XIII, Section 29, of the California Constitution to allow cities and
counties to enter into agreements to share sales and use tax revenues with the approval by
the legislative bodies of both parties by a two-thirds vote; and
Draft: May 31, 2001 -1-
~hY-09-O1 WED 04:10 PM EXEOU'rJvE U?~IUL rHz mu, uuu u~ ~u~ ~, u~
WHEREAS, the State Legislature amended Governmental Code Section 55700 etseq.,
to provide the option for approval of sales tax revenue sharing agreements; and
WHEREAS, the Agreement furthers the public health, safety and general welfare of the
residents of Riverside County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, in consideration of the promises and mutual
covenants and conditions contained herein, the Padies hereto do hereby agree as follows:
Section 1. DEFINITIONS,
Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms defined in this Section shall, for all purposes
of this Agreement, h'ave the meanings herein specified.
Aqreement
"Agreement" means this Sales Tax Revenue Sharing Agreement.
Fiscal Year
"Fiscal Year" is defined as July 1 through June 30.
Net Sales Tax
"Net Sales Tax" is defined as the amount of gross sales tax disbursed to the County imposed
and received by the County under authority granted to the County pursuant to Section 7201 of
the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California, less any amounts which must be
disbursed to any other public entity, including but not limited to the State Board of
Equalization.
Sit.__.~e
"Site" shall mean that certain real property located in the County of Riverside, State of
California, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" and depicted in Exhibit "B".
Histodc Site
"Historic Site" shall mean that certain real property located in State of California County,
County of Riverside more padicularly described in Exhibit C and depicted in Exhibit D.
Sales and Uses Taxes
Draft: May 31, 2001 -2-
"Sales and Use Taxes" means the one percent (1%) sales tax currently imposed and received
by the County under authority granted to the County pursuant to Section 7201 of the Revenue
and Taxation Code of the State of California.
Section 2. PAYMENTS TO THE CITY.
"(A) From Jul 1,2001, County shall pay City an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of
the Net Sales Tax revenue that the County receives from taxable sales occurring on the Site.
Such payments shall continue until such time as the County's share of the Net Sales Tax
revenue it retains from the Site pursuant to this Agreement equals one million nine hundred
thousand dollars ($1,900,000.00) or such other amount as is necessary to fulfill County's
obligation under the Development Agreement between the County and the owner of the Site. In
the event the County's obligation under the De~,elopment Agreement exceeds $1.9 million,
County shall notify City of the amount of its obligation as soon as practicable following the date
of this Agreement and upon such notice the amount of the obligation shall be used in place of
the $1.9 million figure."
"(B) Within twelve (12) months from the date the County's obligation to developer
under the Development Agreement for the site is fulfilled, City shall use its best efforts to take
such action as are required by law to apply for the annexation of the Redhawk Area, as
described in Exhibit E, to the City of Temecula and to set an election date for the residents of
the Redhawk Area to vote on the City's special park tax and rates and charges imposed by the
Temecula Community Services District for funding certain municipal services."
"(C) If the Redhawk Area is annexed to the City, the City shall retain one hundred
percent (100%) of the sales and use tax revenues generated on the Site pursuant to Section
7201 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. If the Redhawk Area is not annexed to the City, the
County shall retain one hundred percent of the sales and use tax revenues generated on the
Site pursuant to Section 7201 of the Revenue and Taxation Code."
Section 3. INTENTIONALLY DELETED
Section 4. TAX SHARING FROM THE HISTORIC SITE. County shall retain one
hundred percent (100%) of the Net Sales Tax revenue that the County receives from taxable
sales occurring on the Historic Site. Upon annexation of the Historic Site, City shall pay to
County, one hundred 100% of the Net Sales Tax revenue that the City receives from taxable
sales occurring on the Historic Site.
Section 5. TIME OF PAYMENT. Payments required hereunder by either City or
County shall be paid within thirty (30) days of receipt of Applicable Sales and Use Taxes from
the State Board of Equalization.
Section 6. STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT, The County shall provide the City with a
Draft: May 31, 2001 -3-
MRY-09-O1 NED 04:11 PM EXECUTIVE OFFICE ~R~ Nu, uuu u9b llu~ r, u~
Statement of Account upon request of City staff. The Statement of Account shall include, but
not be limited to, the following: sales tax revenue collected by the County 1o date for the Fiscal
Year, sales tax revenue collected by the County during the preceding Fiscal Year, sales tax
revenue disbursed to the City during the preceding Fiscal Year, and the total of all sales tax
revenues disbursed to the City from the date of execution of this Agreement, If annexation of
the Historic Site should occur, City shall provide the same information to County with respect
to the Historic Site upon request of County staff.
Section 7. ASSIG, NMENT. Neither this Agreement nor any clause or provision
contained herein may be assigned, transferred or released without the express written
consent of the Parties hereto.
Section 8. NOTIFICATION. All notices, statements, demands, requests, consents,
approvals, authorizations, offers, agreements, appointments or designations hereunder by
either Party to the other shall be in writing and shall be sufficiently given and served upon the
other Party, if sent by United States registered mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid
and addressed as follows:
County:
County Executive Officer
County of Riverside
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
City:
City Manager
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92589
With a copy to:
Executive Director
County of Riverside Economic Development Agency
3525 Fourteenth Street
Riverside, CA 92501-3813
Section 9, ~UTHORITY TO EXECUTE. The person or persons executing this
Agreement on the behalf of the City warrants and represents that they have the authority to
execute this Agreement on behalf of the City.
Draft: May 31, 2001 -4-
WED 04:11 PM E×EOUTIVE OFFIOE FflX NO, ~u~ Bbb llUb r, UO
Section 10. CHANGES OR MODIFICAT.IONS. No part of this Agreement may be
modified, altered, amended, waived, or changed without the express written consent of both of
the Padies.
Section 11. TERMINATION. County or City mayterminate this Agreement if the other
party commits any material breach of this Agreement and has not cured, or where such cure
cannot be completed within thirty (30) days, commenced efforts to cure such breach within
thirty (30) days of the date of receipt of written demand to cure.
Section 12. ATTORNEY F.EES. If any action is brought to enforce the provisions of
this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney fees,
costs, and necessary disbursements.
Section 13. WAIVER_. Any waiver by the County of any breach of any one or more of
the terms of this Agreement shall not be construed to be a waiver of any subsequent or other
term thereof. Failure on the part of the County to require exact, full, and complete compliance
with any terms of this Agreement shall not be construed as in any manner changing the terms
of this Agreement, or stopping the County from enforcement hereof.
Section 14..SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this Agreement is held by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall
nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way.
Section 15. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement will be governed by and construed
in accordance with the laws of the State of California,
Section 16. NOTICES OF TERMINATION. Notice of termination bythe Countyto the
City shall be deemed delivered if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the
individual representing the City at the address set forth in Section 9 hereof. Notice by the City
to the County shall be deemed delivered if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, to
the individual representing the County at the address set forth in Section 9 hereof.
Section 17. INDEM,NIFICATION.
Draft: May 31, 2001
~Y-09-01 WED 04:11 PM EXEOU?IVE OFFIOE E~X Nu, uuu Ubb llUb r, u,
17.1 The City agrees to and shall defend, indemnify and hold the County
free and harmless from all claims, actions, damages, liabilities of whatsoever kind, nature or
sort, arising from any and all actual or alleged claims, demands, causes of action, liability,
loss, damage, and/or injury to persons or property which the County may suffer as a result of
any negligent act or omission of the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents
relating to or in any way connected with the accomplishment of work or performance of
services pursuant to this Agreement, regardless of the existence or degree of fault or
negligence on the pad o! the County or any elected official, officer, employee, or agent of the
County, other than the sole active negligence of the County, its elected officials, officers,
employees, or agents. This indemnification includes, without limitation, the payment of all
Judgments, awards, attorneys' fees, and related costs or expenses, and the reimbursement of
the County, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents for all legal expenses and
costs incurred by each of them, The City's obligation to indemnify shall survive the expiration
or termination of this Agreement, and shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any,
received by the City, its officers, employees, agents, contractors, or subcontractors.
17.2 The County agrees to and shall defend, indemnify, and hold free
and harmless the City free and harmless from all claims, actions, damages, liabilities of
whatsoever kind, nature or sort, arising from any and all actual or alleged claims, demands,
causes of action, liability, loss, damage, and/or injury to persons or property which the City
may suffer as a result of any negligent act or emission of the County, its elected officials,
officers, employees, and agents relating to or in any way connected with the accomplishment
of work or performance of services pursuant to this Agreement, regardless of the existence or
degree of fault or negligence on the pad. of the City or any elected official, officer, employee,
or agent of the City, other than the sole active negligence of the City, its elected officials,
officers, employees, or agents. This indemnification includes, without limitation, the payment
of all judgments, awards, attorneys' fees, and related costs or expenses, and the
Draft: May 31, 2001
'6'
D~Y-09-O1 WED 04:11 PM EXECUTIVE OFFICE FAX NO, 909 955 11u5 K, u~
reimbursement of the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents for all legal
expenses and costs incurred by each of them. The County's obligation to indemnify shall
survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement, and shall not be restricted to insurance
proceeds, if any, received by the Countyl-ii-s- ~h;ice-~'~, en~ploye~s, ~g~-nt~, c0'n(ractors, or
subcontractors.
Section 18. INDEPENDENT CAPACITY. The City, its officers, employees, and
agents shall act in an independent capacity during the term of this Agreement and not as
officers, employees, or agents of the County, nor shall they have authority to contract for or on
behalf of, or incur obligations on behalf of, the County.
Section 19. DISPUTES_. The parties may mutually agree to non-binding mediation
services conducted by the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc./Endispute, or its
successor, or any other neutral, impadial arbitration service that the padies mutually agree
upon in accordance with its rules for such mediation.
Section 20, MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MATTERS,
20.1 Exhibits. All exhibits attached to this Agreement are incorporated
herein by reference.
20.2 !ncorpora~ion of Recitals. The Recitals are specifically incorporated
into this Agreement.
20,3 Counterpart.s.. Separate counterparts of this Agreement may be
separately signed by each party, all with the same effect as though the same counterpart had
been signed simultaneously by the Parties signing each such counterpart,
20.4 .Gender. In this Agreement, the masculine gender includes the
feminine and neuter, and the singular number includes the plural, and vice versa, where
the context so indicates.
20.5 Effective Date, This Agreement shall be effective and binding
upon the Padies on the date this Agreement is signed by the Parties hereto (Effective Date).
Draft: May 31, 2001 -7-
H~Y-09-01 WED 04:12 PM EXEGU'I']V~ U~YIU~ rH~ mu, uuu uoo t~uo r, uo
20.6 Sections and Captions. All references to Sections refer to Sections
in this Agreement unless otherwise stated, Captions are for convenience of reference only
and do not constitute a portion of this Agreement.
20.7 SucceSsors End As~iqn~. T~is Ag~ee~eht Shall be binding upon
and inure to the benefit of the Parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns,
20.8 .Time. Time is of the essence in each provision of this Agreement.
20.9 Fudher Assurances, Each party hereto shall, upon the request of
the other pady hereto, take such other actions and sign such other documents (in recordable
form, if required) as may be reasonably required to carry the provisions of this Agreement into
effect,
' t
Section 2'1, ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the ent re egreemen
and understanding between the Parties. There are no oral understandings, terms, condifons
or promises, and no party has relied upon any representation, express or implied, not
contained in this Agreement, This Agreement may only be modified or amended in writing
and must be signed by the party, identified in Section 10 of this Agreement, to be charged.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Padies have executed this Agreement on the date first
above written.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
James A, Venable, Chairman
Board of Supervisors
APPROVED AS TO FORM
ATTEST
By: Joe S. Rank, Assistant County Counsel By:
CITY OF TEMECULA
Gerald A. Maloney, Clerk of the Board
-8-
Draft: May 31, 2001
H~Y-O9-O1 ~ED 04:12 PH EXECUTIVE O~l~b rH~ ~u, uuu uuu ~uo ,, ,~
By:
Jeff Comerchem, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM ATTEST
By;
City Attorney
By:
Susan Jones, City Clerk
Draft: May 31, 2001 -9-
ITEM 6
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR. OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
TEMECULACOMMUNITYSERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
Shawn D. Nelson, General Manager
June 12, 2001
Review and Adoption of the FY 2001-02 Annual Operating Budget
PREPARED BY:
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance ~
Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING THE FY 2001~2 ANNUAL
OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN
APPROPRIATIONS
DISCUSSION:The proposed FY 2001-02 TCSD operating budget includes the operation and
maintenance of district-wide parks and recreation facilities, debt service on the certificates of
participation issued for the construction of the Community Recreation Center, arterial street lighting
and traffic signals, and median landscaping. Rates and charges are also established for residential
street lighting, slope maintenance, refuse collection and street sweeping, and emergency street and
road construction and maintenance.
Parks and recreation services, as well as arterial street lighting and traffic signals, and median
landscaping are primarily funded by the special tax assessed to property owners as approved by the
voters as "Measure C" in March 1997. The maximum level of special tax that was approved bythe
voters is $74.44 per single-family dwelling unit. Over the past three years the special tax rate has
been gradually reduced to $63.44 per dwelling unit, with the $11.00 per dwelling unit difference being
funded by the City's General Fund through the Revenue Excess Sharing for Temecula ("REST")
program. The proposed FY 2000-01 budget reflects no change in the existing special tax rate.
Residential street lighting, slope maintenance, refuse collection and street sweeping, and emergency
street and road construction and maintenance services provided by the TCSD are funded primarily
by rates and charges assessed to property owners within the District. No changes are proposed in
any of the service level rates and charges.
On May 15, 2001, the Board of Directors/City Council held a workshop to review and discuss
the proposed operating budgets. At that time, the Board of Directors/City Council provided
staff with direction to increase the "REST" contribution to the TSCD in an effort to provide
increased summer recreation opportunities to the youth of Temecula through the Summer
Month Activities and Recreation in Temecula ("SMART") program. This program will provide
expanded mobile recreation activities at various City parks for an estimated cost of $75,000.
The Board of Directors/City Council also provided direction to staff to provide free public
swimming opportunities for residents (resulting in an estimated revenue reduction of $25,000).
As a result, the Revenue Excess Sharing for Temecula ("REST") contribution to the Temecula
Community Services District has thus been increased by ~100,000.
TCSD Revenues
Overall, a $1,729,540 or 20.0% increase in revenues is projected for TCSD. This increase is due
largely to the Vail Ranch annexation. The FY 2001-02 revenue estimates include no change to the
special tax rate, or to any of the TCSD assessment rates. The total "REST" program revenue (from
the City's General Fund) is proposed to be $2,117,000, a $388,000 increase from the FY 2000-01
amount. The estimated amount of "Measure C" special tax revenues to be collected is $2,626,000,
an increase of $139,900 from the FY 2000-01 amount.
TCSD Expenditures
The proposed Community Services District budget reflects a $1,952,539 (21.6%) increase in total
expenditures from the current year budget. A summary of significant items is as follows:
City-wide Operations
A $232,760 increase is reflected in utility and street lighting costs due to anticipated
electricity rate increases (estimated at 40%), as well as to additions to the City's park,
median, and arterial street lighting systems
~' A $108,000 increase is reflected in facility maintenance and rehabilitation costs due to the
addition of new facilities
> $165,540 is included for the operation and maintenance of the Children's Museum
Service Level B
A $251.100 increase is reflected in residential street lighting costs due to anticipated
electricity rate increases (estimated at 40%) and additions to the City's residential street
lighting system
Service Level C ~' A $121,900 increase in electricity and water utility costs is reflected due to anticipated
electricity rate increases (estimated at 40%) and the addition of slope areas
~' A $269,100 increase in landscape maintenance and rehabilitation is reflected
Service Level D
~' $432,370 increase in refuse hauling costs is reflected, due primarily to an increase in the
number of parcels served
2
TCSD Fund Balance
Surplus fund balance has been used over the past several fiscal years to fund ongoing operations
and maintenance costs. The proposed FY 2001-02 budget continues to utilize surplus fund balance,
in the following amounts:
· City-wide Operations $373,930
· Service Level "B" $ 79,470
· Service Level "C" $144,380
· Service Level "D" $ 24,310
· Service Level "R' $ 4,160
It is anticipated that the actual amount of fund balance required to be used will be less than the
amounts reflected above, based on a demonstrated pattern of actual expenditures being less than
the budgeted amounts.
FISCAL IMPACT: The services provided by the District are funded primarily by the special tax
that was approved by the voters as Measure C in March, 1997, the "REST" contribution from the
City's General Fund, and the rates and charges assessed to property owners which are to be
approved during a public hearing held on June 12, 2001.
Attachments: Resolution No. CSD 2001-
FY 2001-02 Annual Operating Budget
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2001-.~
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING THE FY 2001-02 ANNUAL
OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN
APPROPRIATIONS
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District has
reviewed the proposed final FY 2001-02 annual operating budget and has held such public meetings
as are necessary pdor to adoption of the final operating budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula
Community Services District as follows:
Section 1. That the FY 2001-02 TCSD operating budget is hereby adopted.
Section 2. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget
appropriations:
A. No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered
appropriation available to cover the expenditure.
B. The Department Director may prepare a transfer of appropriations within
departmental budget accounts, with the approval of the General Manager.
C. The Board of Directors must authorize transfers (appropriations) of funds from
the Unreserved Fund Balance and transfers between departmental budget
accounts.
D. The Board of Directors must authorize any increase in regular personnel
positions above the level indicated in the final budget. The General Manager
may authorize the hiring of temporary or part time staff as necessary within the
limits imposed by the controls listed above.
E. The General Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to
$25,000. Any expenditure of funds in excess of $25,000 requires Board of
Directors action.
F. Pursuant to Section 3.32.050 of the Temecula Municipal Code, the General
Manager may authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to $25,000. Any
expenditures of Public Works funds in excess of $25,000 require Board of
Directors action, except that the General Manager may approve change orders
on Public Works contracts approved by the Board in amounts up to project
contingency established by the Board.
Section 3. Outstanding encumbrances shown on the District books at June 30, 2001 are
hereby appropriated for such contracts or obligations for FY 2001-02.
Section 4. The Board Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of June 2001.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, President
Susan W. Jones, CMC
Distdct Secretary/City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 2001- was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the
Temecula Community Services District at a regular meeting thereof held on the 12th day of June
2001, by the following vote of the Board of Directors:
AYES:
BOARDMEMBERS:
NOES:
BOARDMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
BOARDMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
District Secretary/City Clerk
PROPOSED OPERATI'NG BUDGET
TEMECULA COMMUNI'TY SERVi'CES DTSTRTCT
FI'SCAL YEAR 200'1-02
REVENUES BY FUND- COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
Actual Actual Estimated Projected
FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02
Parks and Recreation $ 3,886,907 $ 4,457,878 $ 4,960,700 $ 5,653,000
Service Level B 324,875 357,922 378,000 540,000
Service Level C 607,215 607,697 615,800 1,057,000
Service Level D 2,294,255 2,337,268 2,636,260 3,070,000
Service Level R 13,119 12,593 12,100 13,000
Debt Service* 35,547 35,344 35,600 35,000
Total $ 7,161,918 $ 7,808,702 $ 8,638,460 $ 10,368,000
*Does not include operating transfers from Parks and Recreation to Debt Service Fund.
S7.162
$7.809
$8.638
$10.368
FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00
Actual Actual
[] Parks and Recreation
~]Service Level D
FY 2000-01
Estimated
VIService Le~l B
· lService Level R
FY 2001-02
Projected
i*l Service Level C
[] Debt Service*
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY CATEGORY- COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT FUNDS
Operations Capital Operating
Fund Personnel & Maintenance Outla}, Transfers Total
Parks andRecreation* $ 2,175,950 $ 3,379,280 $ 6,700 $ 5,561,930
Service Level B 3,370 616,100 619,470
Service Level C 184,880 1,016,500 1,201,380
Service Level D 26,900 3,067,410 3,094,310
Service Level R 17,160 17,160
Debt Service 499,580 499,580
Total $ 2,391,100 $ 8,596,030. $ 6,7013 $ $ 10,993,830
* Parks and Recreation does not include $465,000 operating transfer to the Debt Service Fund.
2
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES
RECREATION
SERVICES
co~-rr~ SErViCeS
Herman D. Parker
DEPUTY DIRECTOR
OF
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Phyllis Ruse
I
I
DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
I
SERVICES
Youth & Adult Sports
Special Events
Volunteer & Cultural Services
Teen & Recreational Services
Senior & Human Services
Park Acquisition
Park Development
Assessment Administration
Development Review
Solid Waste Administration
Park Maintenance
Median Maintenance
Slope Maintenance
Facility Maintenance
- Cable Television Administration
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES
Program: Community Services Funding Source:
PARKS AND RECREATION*
Special Tax
Benefit Assessments
General Fund
Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed
Expenditure Summary FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001~02
Personnel $ 1,205,576 $ 1,411,302 $ 1,783,870 $ 2,175,950
Operations and Maintenance 2,142,549 2,460,612 2,947,150 3,379,280
Capital Outlay 17,238 24,947 64,950 6,700
SERVICE LEVEL B
$ 3~3651363 $ 3~896~861 $. 41795~970 $ 5,561~930
Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed
Expenditure Summary FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02
Personnel $ 7,246 $ 73 $ 3,150 $ 3,370
Opemtinns and Maintenance 299,990 324,595 364,700 616,100
Capital Outlay
SERVICE LEVEL C
$ 307 236 $ 324,668 $ 367 850 $ 619~470
Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed
Expenditure Summary FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02
Personnel $ 109,071 $ 101,351 $ 109,820 $ 184,880
Operations and Maintenance 448,280 512,167 595,330 1,016,500
Capital Outlay
$ 5571351 $.. 6131518 $ 705~150 $ 1~201~380
*Does not include operating transfers out.
4
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES
SERVICE LEVEL D
Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed
Expenditure Summary FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02
Personnel $ 36,533 $ 21,022 $ 24,990 $ 26,900
Operations and Maintenance 2,242,086 2,323,165 2,632,170 3,067,410
Capital Outlay
SERVICE LEVEL R
Expenditure Summary
Personnel
Operations and Maintanan, $
Capital Outlay
$
DEBT SERVICE
Expenditure Summary
Personnel
Operations and Maintenan, $
Capital Outlay
$
$ 2,278,619 $ 2,344,187 $ 2,657,160 $ 3,094,310
Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed
FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02
7,959 $ 11,493 $ 17,160 $ 17,160
7,959 $ 11,49..~3. $ 17,160 $ 17,160
Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed
FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02
501,607 $ 499,445 $ 498,000 $ 499,580
501,607 $ 499,445 $ 498,000 $ 499,580
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES
PARKS AND RECREATION
Director of Community Services
Deputy Director of Corranunity Services
Maintenance Superintendent
Development Services Administrator
Recreation Superintendent
Maintenance Supervisor
Management Analyst
Senior Landscape Inspector
Museum Services Manager
Aquatics Supervisor
Recreation Supervisor
Administrative Secretary
Lead Maintenance Worker
Recreation Coordinator
Landscape Inspector
Maintenance Worker
Office Specialist
Custodian
Total
SERVICE LEVEL B
Management Analyst
SERVICE LEVEL C
Maintenance Superintendent
Maintenance Supervisor
Management Analyst
Senior Landscape Inspector
Landscape Inspector
Office Specialist
Total
SERVICE LEVEL D
Development Services Administrator
Management Analyst
offce Specialist
Toml
Community Services Total
Authorized Authorized
2000-01 Changes 2001-02
1.00 0.00 1.00
1.00 0.00 1.00
0.70 0.00 0.70
0.85 0.00 0.85
1.00 0.00 1.00
1.40 0.00 1.40
0.50 0.00 0.50
0.50 0.00 0.50
1.00 1.00 2.00
0.00 1.00 1.00
2.00 0.00 2.00
1.00 0.00 1.00
1.50 0.00 1.50
3.00 0.00 3.00
0.25 1.00 1.25
1.50 1.00 2.50
2.30 0.00 2.30
1.00 0.00 1.00
20.50 4.00 24.50
0.05 0.00 0.05
0.05 0.00 0.05
0.30 0.00 0.30
0.30 0.00 0.30
0.50 0.00 0.50
0.50 0.00 0.50
0.30 0.00 0.30
1.95 0.00 1.95
0.15 0.00 0.15
0.15 0.00 0.15
0.10 0.00 0.10
0.40 0.00 0.40
22.90 4.00 26.90
6
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES
PROGRAM: RECREATION SERVICES
MISSION: The Recreation Services Program is responsible for providing a comprehensive,
Citywide recreation program that meets the recreation and human service needs within
the community.
2000-01 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
Expanded High Hopes, Parent & Me, Tiny Tots and Mobile Recreation programs
Completed a Museum Brochure
Ongoing coordination of Sister City visitation
Received in-kind service commitments from various local businesses
Created and dislributed a coloring book brochure to increase park awareness
Implemented an annual Summer Concert Series
GOAL 1:
OBJECTIVES:
GOAL 2:
OBJECTIVES:
GOAL 3:
OBJECTIVES:
GOAL 4:
OBJECTIVES:
PLAN, PROGRAM AND IMPLEMENT AQUATIC ACTIVITY AT THE
CHAPARRAL HIGH SCHOOL POOL
Increase the overall number of aquatic opportunities offered by the City at the Chaparral
High School Pool
DEVELOP A BANNER PROGRAM FOR ESTABLISHED CITYWIDE SPECIAL
EVENTS
Establish a banner program that increases the community's awareness of major citywide
special events
Pursue the type of banner that is most cost effective and seek sponsorship funding for
each event's marketing materials
DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT "MAIL-IN" REGISTRATION OPPORTUNITIES
FOR SWIM LESSONS AND TINY-TOT PROGRAMS
Reduce the time necessary to register participants for popular City programs
DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT ACTIVITIES FOR THE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM
Increase the overall number of opportunities offered by the Children's Museum
Maintain a well supplied and stocked giR shop
7
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES
GOAL 5:
OBJECTIVES:
GOAL 6:
OBJECTIVES:
PLAN, PROGRAM AND IMPLEMENT A SUMMER CONCERT SERIES
~ Coordinate and implement an Annual Summer Concert Series
~' Provide a variety of musical entertainment to increase attendance by the community
ANNEXATION OF VAIL RANCH
~ Coordinate and implement a Grand Opening celebration
~ Incorporate special events and programs in the Vail Ranch area (i.e., Annual Spring Egg
Hunt and Mobile Recreation Program)
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
Number of aquatic programs implemented at
Chaparral High School
Recreation program banners
Mail-in registration for Tiny Tots and Swim
Lessons
Number of birthday party programs at the
Children's Museum
Number of excursion programs implemented
at the Children's Museum
Projected Actual Projected Projected
FY 1999-00 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 ~
N/A N/A N/A 6
0 0 0 2
0 0 0 4
0 0 0 24
0 0 0 2
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES
PROGRAM: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
MISSION: The Development Services Program is responsible for park site acquisition and
development, assessment engineering, development review, and solid waste and cable
television franchise administration.
2000-01 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
Completed the design of the Chaparral High School swimming pool
Completed the Children's Museum Feasibility Study
Completed the design of the Rancho California Sports Park Lighting Project
Provided for the dedication of Long Canyon Creek Park on December 12, 2000
Completed the master plan for the Temecula Public Library
Completed 40-Acre Sports Complex Master Plan
Completed the Water Park Feasibility Study
GOALI:
OBJECTIVES:
GOAL 2:
OBJECTIVES:
GOAL 3:
OBJECTIVES:
PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE, BALANCED NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY
PARK AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES SYSTEM THROUGHOUT THE CITY
OF TEMECULA
Complete the 40-Acre Sports Park
Complete design and construction of the Children's Museum
Assist with the completion of the Library grant application
Complete construction of Chaparral Aquatics Facility
Complete improvements for ADA access at Rancho California Sports Park and selected
school sites
Coordinate with Public Works to design and start construction of the trail improvements
along Murrieta Creek, utilizing the TEA grant monies
Seek grant funding for trails, museums and other City facilities
INCREASE EFFICIENCY WITHIN THE DIVISION
Ascertain benefits and capabilities of Sierra Software and train staffto implement use
Implement written policies and procedures
Create an election package for developers to inform them of costs, requirements and
timing of in-house audit of assessment appeals
Compile all appeals on a database for easy access
DEVELOP NEW PROCEDURES TO MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE THE
CITY'S SOLID WASTE DIVERSION RATES
Continue to monitor solid waste and correct tonnage attributed to the City that originate
in other areas
Develop new programs for residents and commercial refuse generators to educate and
help them set recycling goals
Complete our own Solid Waste Diversion Annual Report
Seek additional grant funding
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES
GOAL 4:
OBJECTIVES:
GOAL 5:
OBJECTIVES:
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
INCREASE MARKETING OF RECREATION FACILITIES
P Fund, design and produce a City Parks Brochure
~ Increase use of City web site
VAIL RANCH ANNEXATION
Name all parks sites within the Vail Ranch annexation area
Install park signs at all named parks within the Vail Ranch annexation area
Complete improvements to Vail Ranch
Projected
FY ! 999-09
Number of capital projects completed
Number of Improvements completed in
annexation area
Number of recreational marketing techniques
developed
Number of written policies and procedures
created
4
0
0
0
Actual
FY i 999-90
4
0
0
0
Projected
FY 2000-01
6
0
0
0
Projected
FY 2001-02
4
4
2
3
10
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES
PROGRAM: MAINTENANCE SERVICES
MISSION: The Maintenance Services Program is responsible for providing effective landscape and
facility maintenance services to parks, slopes, medians, recreation facilities and City
administrative offices.
2000-01 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
.Worked with West Coast Arborists and GIS to develop and acquire software to
Implement an urban forest management program for City parks, slope areas and facilities
Implemented a slope rehabilitation program identifying sites to be included in the slope
area rehabilitation project
Designed the central control (Maxicom) system
GOAL 1:
OBJECTIVES:
GOAL 2:
OBJECTIVES:
GOAL3:
OBJECTIVES:
PROVIDE A SAFE AND ATTRACTIVE FACILITY, PARK, SLOPE AND TRAIL
SYSTEM
Ensure sites are safe, clean and green at all times
Ensure performance compliance of City maintenance contractors
Develop priorities for site repairs, renovations and rehabilitation
Work closely with the Police Department to monitor problem areas to increase public
safety and vandalism response
DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT AN UPDATED PLAYGROUND SAFETY
PROGRAM TO MEET CURRENT SAFETY GUIDELINE REQUIREMENTS
Conduct an inventory and safety audit of all City owned play structures to determine
compliance with current safety guidelines
Identify non-compliant play structures and prioritize a retrofit/repair program
Implement retrofit/repair program
Acquire a state of the art software program to manage all playground safety data
Appropriate funding to conduct inventory and safety audit, purchase software program
and begin retrofit and repair program
IMPLEMENT A PROGRAM TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL TRAINING FOR
MAINTENANCE STAFF IN VARIOUS CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING
MAINTENANCE TRADES
Hold in-house training classes where staff share their training and expertise
Request equipment and material vendors to provide on-site and off-site training
Acquire basic home/facility improvement text books for staffto study and review
various topics in staffmeeting or study classes
Encourage staff to seek and complete additional training opportunities
Il
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES
GOAL 4:
OBJECTIVES:
GOAL 5:
OBJECTIVES:
STANDARDIZE FIELD, COURT AND AREA LIGHTING CONTROLLERS AT
CITY PARKS AND FACILITIES
Evaluate and select a standard lighting controller system
De~,elop a procedure for field, court, parking lot and area lighting operation and
maintenance
Identify and prioritize sites in need of the upgrade; and appropriate funding for design
and installation of lighting conn'ol systems
VAIL RANCH ANNEXATION
Evaluate and select a standard lighting controller system
De.velop a procedure for field, court, parking lot and area lighting operation and
maintenance
Identify and prioritize sites in need of the upgrade; and appropriate funding for design
and installation of lighting control systems
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
Complete the audit of 24 play structures at
City park sites
Complete retrofit based upon audit results
Hold quarterly training sessions with staff
Increase division library reference manuals,
books and catalogs
Select standard lighting control system
Install new lighting control system at
designated sites
Projected Actual Projected Projected
FY i 999-00 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 ~
N/A N/A N/A 24
N/A N/A N/A 12
N/A N/A 0 4
N/A N/A 0 3
N/A N/A N/A l
N/A N/A N/A 2
12
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES
MISSION:
PROGRAM: DEBT SERVICE
The Debt Service Program provides for the payment of principal, interest, and related
costs for the 1992 Certificates of Participation issued for the construction of the
Community Recreation Center.
2000-01 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
~' All debt service and related costs for the 1992 Certificates of Participation were made in
a timely manner
GOAL 1:
ENSURE TIMELY PAYMENT OF DEBT SERVICE AND RELATED COSTS
13
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
MARCH 27, 200t
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 8:33
P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone,
Roberts
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBER: None
Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Lease of A,qency Property - 27500 Jefferson Avenue
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve a two-year lease agreement with the Donna Reeves Trust UTD 7-25-90
for Agency property located at 27500 Jefferson Avenue.
MOTION: Agency Member Comerchero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The
motion was seconded by Agency Member Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
No additional comments.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No comment.
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
No comment.
R:\Minutes.rda\032701 1
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:34 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, April 10, 2001, in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California.
Ron Robe,s, Chairman
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Agency Secretary
[SEAL]
R:~vlinutes.rda\032701 2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
APRIL '10, 2001
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 8:36
P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 5
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone,
and Chairman Roberts.
ABSENT:
0 AGENCY MEMBER: None.
Also present were Executive Director Nelson, Assistant City Attorney Curley, and City Clerk
Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
Mayor Comerchero advised that the City Council would convene for the purpose of a Joint meeting
with the Redevelopment Agency.
AGENCY BUSINESS
Formation of Joint Exercise of Powers Authority; Approval of Deposit/Reimbursement
Agreement
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AUTHORIZING FORMATION OF A JOINT
EXERCISE OF POWERS AUTHORITY WITH THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
1.2 That the Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING FORMATION OF A JOINT
EXERCISE OF POWERS AUTHORITY WITH THE CITY OF
TEMECULA
1.3
That the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency execute the joint exercise
of powers agreement creating the Temecula Public Financing Authority.
R:\Minutes\041001
1
Mr. Wesley Hylen, representing Ashby Development Company, Inc., provided the rationale for
the request to have this item continued, noting that there was a change in ownership and that
the documents were not in the proper format to be signed; and in response to Chairman
Roberts, specified the desire to continue the matter to the April 24, 2001 meeting.
Mr. Richard Ashby, representing Ashby Development Company, Inc., provided an overview of
the tax issues, emphasizing the desire for a staff member of his, or himself, to be involved in
any meetings discussing this issue, relaying his opposition if the tax figure was over 1.99%.
MOTION: Agency Member Comerchero moved to continue this matter to the April 24, 2001
meeting. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Stone and voice vote reflected
unanimous approval.
At 8:42 P.M. Mayor Comerchero advised that the City Council would recess from this joint
meeting.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
For clarification, Executive Director Nelson relayed that if, and when, the City does proceed with the
formation of the CFD, that Mr. Ashby will be closely involved with the CFD process.
AGENCY MEMBERS'REPORTS
No comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:43 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to the next
regular meeting on April 24, 2001, scheduled to follow the Community Services District meeting,
in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Ron Roberts, Chairman
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk/Agency Secretary
[SEAL]
R:\Minutes\041001
2
ITEM 2
APPROVAL ~'~h ~
C~NEY ~J~/
FINANCE DIRECTOR
CITY MANAGER._~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
John Meyer, Redevelopment Director
June 12, 2001
First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement with Fisher Merriman Sehgal
Yanez, Inc.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency Board:
1. Amend the Professional Services Agreement with Fisher Merriman Sehgal Yanez, Inc. for
the final design of the Old Town Community Theater in the amount of $420,000;
2. Approve a 10% contingency in the amount of $42,000.
BACKGROUND: On April 24, 2001, the Agency Board approved the schematic design and site
master plan for the Old Town Community Theater and directed staffto proceed with development
design and construction drawing phase of the project. The first amendment to the professional
services agreement with Fisher Merriman Sehgal and Yanez, Inc. is for the phase II design of the
Old Town Community Theater. This will include design development, construction drawings and bid
documents.
FISCAL IMPACT: Phase II design of the Old Town Community Theater, with contingency is
$462,000. There are adequate funds in the current Capital Improvement Program budget.
ATTACHMENT:
1. Second Amendment to Agreement
2. Professional Services Agreement with Fisher Merriman Sehgal Yanez, Inc.
3. Scope of Work
R:\Oldtown\Temecula Playhouse~staffreportexclusfishm2.doc
SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AND
FISHER MERRIMAN SEHGAL YANZ, INC.
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of May 22, 2001 by and between
the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("Agency") and Fisher
Merriman Sehgal Yanez, Inc. ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and
conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as foilows:
1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes:
A. On June 13, 2001 the Agency and Consultant entered into that certain
agreement entitled "Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula Agreement for Consultant
Services" ("Agreement").
B. The Agreement was amended on May 24, 2001. The Agreement as
amended shall be referred to as the "Agreement."
C. The Agency Board approved the schematic design and site master plan on
April 24, 2001. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment.
2. The following sentence is added to Section 2 of the Agreement: "The Consultant
shall proceed with Stage II of the project design as set forth in Section 1.0.B. of Exhibit A,
the Scope of Work.
3. Section 4 of the Agreement is amended to provide that the maximum payment for the
Consultant's services shall be five hundred forty one thousand dollars ($541,000) consisting
of $75,000 for Stage I Design, $420,000 for Stage II Design, $42,000 contingency for Stage
II Design and $4,000 for reimbursable expenses, as provided in Exhibit B.
4. Exhibit B attached hereto, is hereby added to and describes the fees and project
schedule.
5. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and Conditions of
the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
R:~4MENDMENT~i2NDAMENDMENTFISHERMERRI'DOC 1
IN WlTN ESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the
day and year first above written.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA
BY:
Ronald E. Roberts, Chairperson
ATTEST:
BY:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
BY:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
BY: FISHER MERRIMAN SEGHAL YANZ INC
5567 Reseda Blvd., Suite 209
Tarzana, CA 91356
NAME:
TITLE:
BY:
NAME:
TITLE:
(Two Signatures Required For Corporations)
R: b~IENDMEN~2NDAMENDMENTFISHEP~dERRI. DOC 2
Temecula CommunityTheatreProposal
John Meyer
25 May 2000
page 5
2.0
3.0
4.0
EXHIBIT B
PHASE I
FEES:
We propose a lump sum fee of $ 75,000.00 for Programming and Schematic
Design, which would be comprised of the following per phase:
A. Programming: .......................................................................... $15,000.00
B. Schematic Design Phase: ........................................................... 60,000.00
C. Total ........................................................................................ $ 75, 000.00
D ................................................................................................... Completed
PHASE II
The architectural/engineering design fees for the subsequent phases of the
project will be based upon 9.35% (85% of 11%) of the estimated construction
cost calculated at the end of the Schematic Design Phase. The remaining fee
for subsequent phases shall be distributed as follows:
E.
F.
G.
H.
Design Development Phase ............................................. $105,000
Construction Documents Phase ................................................... $189,000
Bidding ........................................................................................... $21,000
Construction Administration ......................................................... $105,000
Total ............................................................................................. $420,000
PROGRESS PAYMENTS:
For our services, we would invoice monthly based upon a mutually agreed upon
assessment of percentage of completion within each phase.
ADDITIONAL SERVICES:
After the Construction Documents Phase has commenced, if significant changes
are made in the program or design by the Agency, independent of meeting the
project budget, the Architect shall be compensated for additional services.
Additional services shall be billed at our following hourly rates:
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
Senior Principal ............................................................................. $135/hr.
Junior Principals ............................................................................... 100/hr.
Theatre Consultant ............................................................................. 75/hr.
Senior Designers ................................................................................ 60/hr.
Junior Designers ................................................................................ 50/hr.
CAD Operators .................................................................................. 45/hr.
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES:
Reimbursable expenses will be billed at cost, plus 10% handling charges.
Reimbursable expenses would include, but not be limited to, photography,
reproductions and computer plotting beyond the described deliverables per
phase, postage and handling of drawings, and messenger charges.
Allowance ............................................................................................. $ 4,000.00
Temecula CommunityTheatreProposal
John Meyer
25 May 2000
page 6
EXHIBIT B
1.0
PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Our Scope of Work would be performed pursuant to the following projected
schedule:
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
Programming .............................................................................. 4 weeks
Schematic Design ...................................................................... 8 weeks
Design Development ............................................................... 12 weeks
Construction Documents .......................................................... 20 weeks
Bidding ....................................................................................... 4 weeks
Construction Administration ...................................................... 52 weeks
Total ...................................................................................... 100 weeks
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE AGENCY OF TEMECULA
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
DESIGN OF THE OLD TOWN COMMUNITY THEATER
THIS'AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of June 13, 2000, between the
Redevelopment Agency of the Agency of Temecula (~Agency"), a Agency within the municipal
corporation of the Redevelopment Agency of Temecula and Fisher Merriman Seghal Yanez Inc.,
("Consultant'S. In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties
agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on June 13, 2000, and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than
December 2002, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Co'~sultant shall pellorm the services and tasks described and
set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant
shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit
C.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to
the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant
shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted Standards and practices utilized by persons engaged
in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under
this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
a. The Redevelopment Agency agrees to pay CONSULTANT in accordance with
the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates
and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full,
based upon actual time spent on the above tasks and not to exceed the sum of Seventy-Five
Thousand Dollars ($75,000) unless additional contingency work is approved by the Executive
Director of the Agency in an amount not to exceed ten percent (%10) of the maximum amount. Any
terms in Exhibit B other than the payment rates and schedule of payment are null and void. Agency
shall reimburse Consultant up to Four Thousand Dollars ($4,000) for expenses as provided in Exhibit
El.
b. CONSULTANT shall not be compensated for any services rendered in
connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein,
unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the Redevelopment
Agency Executive Director. CONSULTANT shall be compensated for any additional services in the
amounts and in the manner as agreed to by The Redevelopment Agency Executive Director and
CONSULTANT at the time Executive Director authorizes the additional work. Any additional work
in excess of Eight Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($82,500), (which amount is the contract
amount plus the 10% contingency), shall be approved by the Redevelopment Agency.
c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted between the first and f~eenth business day of each month, for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each
invoice as to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written
notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the
invoice.
,5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSI-.
a. The Agency may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend
or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10)
days pdor written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all
work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the Agency suspends or
terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or
invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the
Agency shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination,
provided that the work performed is of value to the Agency. Upon termination of the Agreement
pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the Agency pursuant to Section 4.
6. .DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, Agency shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any
work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by wdtten
notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of
work hereunder adses out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence
of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the Executive Director or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in
default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the
Consultant with wdtten notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon
it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event
that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the Agency shall have the right,
notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further
notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under
this Agreement.
7. ..OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTfi,
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to
sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by Agency that relate to the
performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of
services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be
maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identi-
fied and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of Agency
or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give Agency the right to
examine and audit said books and records, shall permit Agency to make transcripts therefrom as
necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related
to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a
period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data
generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing
the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the
Agency and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the Agency without the permission
of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant
shall make available to the Agency, upon reasonable written request by the Agency, the necessary
computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and pdnting
Computer files.
c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shaft not
be liable for any injudes or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other
than that specified in Exhibit A without the wdtten consent of the Consultant.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect
and hold harmless the Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any
and all c/aims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert
witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the Agency,/ts officers, agents and employees
may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or
damage to properly arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions adsing out
of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only
liability arising out of the negligence of the Agency.
9. I_NSURANCE REQUIREMENTR. Consultant shall procure and maintain for
the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injudes to persons or damages to property
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Consultant,/ts agents, representatives, or employees.
a. _Minimum Scope of Insurance Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form
No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88.
(2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01
06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the
Consultant owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to
the General LJabifity policy described above is acceptable.
(3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
Cafifomia and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no
employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's
compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute
a declaration that it has no employees.
(4) Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form
providing Professional liability for the Consultant's profession.
.Minimum Limits of Insurancn. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
$1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and
property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other
form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to this projectJlocation or the
general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(1)
(2)
(3)
Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California;
Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for
bodily injury or disease.
(4)
Professional Liability coverage:: Two million ($2,000,000) per claim
and in aggregate.
c. _Deductibles and Self-Insured Retention.-,. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the Executive Director. At the option of the
Executive Director, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured
retentions as respects the Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant
shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration
and defense expenses.
d. O~ther Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
The Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed
operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by
the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by
the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on
the scope of protection afforded to the Agency, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers.
For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Agency, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-
insured maintained by the Agency, its officers, officials, employees or
volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not
contribute with it.
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided
to the Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to
the limits of the insurer's liability.
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by
either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30)
days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested,
has been given to the Agency.
e. Acceptability of Insurem. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the Agency. Self
insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements.
f. Verification of Covereqe Consultant shall furnish the Agency with original
endorsements effectin~ coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by
a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on
forms provided by the Agency. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the Agency
before work commences. As an alternative to the Agency's forms, the Consultant's insurer may
provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, incJuding endorsements effecting
the coverage required by these specifications.
10. !NDEPENDENT cONTRACTOr.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the Agency a wholly
independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of
Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither Agency
nor any of its offioers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of
Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this
Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers,
employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the Agency. Consultant
shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against Agency,
or bind Agency in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the
Agreement, Agency shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for
performing services hereunder for Agency. Agency shall not be liable for compensation or
indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
11. ~LEGAL RESPONSIBILmFR. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all
local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those
employed by it or in any way affect the Performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The
Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The
Agency, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure
of the Consultant to Comply with this section.
12. .RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall
be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without Agency's prior written
authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written
authorization from the Agency Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide
declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other
information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or
property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered
"voluntary" provided Consultant gives Agency notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify Agency should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of
deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery
request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed
thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. Agency retains the fight,
but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar
proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with Agency and to provide Agency with the
opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consu rant. However,
Agency's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the dght by Agency to control,
direct, or rewrite said response.
1:~. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other
party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii)
delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that
provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail,
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the n~n'v ~e
set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be
effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following
deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above.
To City:
Redevelopment Agency
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
To Consultant:
43200 Business Park Ddve
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: Executive Director
Fisher Merriman Sehgal Yanez Inc.
5567 Reseda Blvd., #209
Tarzana, CA 91356
14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the
Redevelopment Agency. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant
to this Agreement, only Consultant shall perform the services described in this Agreement.
Consultant may use assistants, under their direct supervision, to perform some of the services under
this Agreement. Consultant shall provide Agency fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure
of Consultant from Consultant's employ. Should he or she leave Consultant's employ, the Agency
shall have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the dose of
said notice period. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be
payment for actual services performed up to, and |nduding, the date of termination or as may be
othenvise agreed to in writing between the Executive Director and the Consultant.
15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall
have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services
described in this Agreement.
16. GOVERNING LAW. The Agency and Consultant understand and agree that
the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the
parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation
concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with
geographic jurisdiction over the Agency of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party
against the other to enforce its dghts under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by
the Court's judgement, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the
relief granted.
17. .PROHIBITED INTEREST. No officer, or employee of the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of TemecuJa shall have any finandal interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement,
the proceeds thereof, the Contractor, or Contractor's sub-contractors for this project, dudng his/her
tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrf'=nts and represents to the Agency that
no officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non~
contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Contractor or
Contractor's sub-contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the Agency in the
event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this
Agreement.
19. .A. UTHORI'I'Y TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the
authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant
to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNES~ WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the
day and year first above wdffen.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA
Attest:
~.usan W. ones, CMC '
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
Fisher Merdman Sehgal Yanez Inc.
5567 Reseda Blvd., #209
Tarzana, CA 91356
(Signatures of t'~vo corporate officers required for Corporations)
25 May 2000
Fisher Merriman Sehgal Yanez Inc.
5567 Reseda Blvd., Suite 209 ~
Tarzana, CA 91356
IIII
(818) 344-3045sy
Fax (818) 344-0338
mail@jsfarchs.com
John Meyer
Redevelopment A"gency
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
RE:
Temecula Old Town Community Theatre
Revised Proposal for Architectural Services
Dear John:
Thank you very much for your selection of our firm as the Architect for this most
significant project. It is our understanding that the Redevelopment Agency is working in
partnership with the local non-profit Theater Foundation to fund and develop this
community theatre project and related facilities, which would consist of the following:
A 300-seat theatre (with the possibility of a future 200 seat balcony) with a fly loft
within approximately 10,000 SF.
A two. story event hall building with classrooms & a rehearsal room of
approximately 6,600 SF.
The renovation of a historical 1891 one-story building of 2,160 SF as the lobby.
The seismic retrofit would be outside the scope of our work.
We would be most pleased to perform architectural basic services, the scope Of which
would include normal structural, mechanical and electrical engineering, as well as
theatre lighting, rigging, drapery and platform systems, plus acoustical, AN systems,
landscaping and all other improvements needed to complete the theatre ready for
occupancy except for moveable non-theatrical furniture, fixtures and equipment.
1.0
SCOPE OF WORK:
Our architectural/engineering design services would be performed in two stages.
Stage I would include Programming and Schematic Design. Stage II would be
comprised of Design Development, Construction Documents, Bidding, and
Construction Administration. The following outlines our scope of work per phase:
Stage I
1. Programming
The Architect will develop the building spatial needs program with
the Redevelopment Agency and the potential user groups, which
will be dedved from conducting and facilitating community
meetings (5 meetings are anticipated).
Temecula Community Theatre Proposal
John Meyer
25 May 2000
page 2
B. Stage
3.
Schematic Design Phase:
The Architect shall provide alternative approaches to design and
construction to satisfy the City and Community's needs.
Presentations shall be made to the Redevelopment Agency and
other applicable agencies and groups for their approval. The
Architect shall prepare deliverables consisting of final schematic
drawings based upon the approved design, consisting of plans,
sections, elevations and perspectives, and shall prepare outline
specifications. The Architect shall review the construction cost
prepared by the cost estimator hired by the Redevelopment
Agency. The Agency approval of the schematic design shall be
the completion of this phase, at which time the inclusion of the Mt.
San Jacinto College program requirements within the proposed
facility will be evaluated by the Agency and a construction cost
estimate will be prepared based upon an updated program to be
used in subsequent phases.
I1:
Design Development Phase:
Based upon the approved schematic design drawings, the
Architect shall prepare design development documents
establishing the design, size of the project, materials, and the
structural, mechanical, electrical, theatre, acoustical, and AA/
systems as well as the landscape design. The Architect shall
prepare deliverables consisting of partially dimensioned and noted
floor and roof plans, sections, and elevations as base sheets to
the Consultants. Short form specifications shall be provided. The
construction cost estimate will be updated with the cost estimator
again. The Agency approval of the design development drawings
shall constitute the completion of this phase and the approval of
the Architect's design.
Construction Documents Phase:
Based upon the approved design development drawings, the
Architect shall prepare and deliver full working drawings and full
specifications necessary for public bidding, permits, and for
construction. The Architect shall obtain any variances and all
approvals necessary for the issuance of all permits. The Architect
will coordinate with the cost estimator on a construction cost
analysis when construction documents are 80% complete.
Sufficient deductive alternates will be stipulated in order to ensure
that the project budget will be achieved without re-drawing and
without re-bidding. The delivery of reproducible documents with
permits and all approvals needed to construct the theatre shall
constitute the completion of this phase.
Temecula Community Theatre Proposal
John Meyer
25 May 2000
page 3
2.0
3.0
Bidding Phase:
The Agency shall prepare its public bid document, obtain public
bids and award and prepare construction contracts. The Architect
shall prepare clarifications to the construction documents, write
any addendums needed to cladfy the bid. documents, and
generally assist the Agency in the bidding phase. The Architect
shall endeavor to cause qualified general contractors to bid and
shall assist the Agency in obtaining bids for the theatre systems.
Construction Administration:
The Architect shall monitor the work by making two site visits per
month. Additional weekly site visits may be made as requested.
The Agency shall be the Construction Manager. The Architect
shall answer all RFIs, provide supplemental instructions and field
drawings as necessary, review and approve all shop drawings,
prepare all technical change orders and review progress
payments. The services would conclude upon completion of
construction, that is, after the issuance of the final punch list, after
completion of the work and final Application and Certificate for
Payment and upon receipt of the Certificate of Occupancy and
Agency approval.
EXCLUSIONS:
Our proposal is based upon the Agency providing construction management
services, an architectural topographic survey, cost estimating services, soil
engineering data, preparing bid documents, advertising for bids, and awarding
the construction contract.
DELIVERABLES:
Our deliverables at each phase would be as follows:
A. Schematic Design Phase:
1. CSI format outline specifications (electronic file and a hard copy).
2. E size amhitectural drawings prepared on AutoCAD r14
(electronic files and one set of computer plots of drawings each at
50% and 100% completion).
B. Design Development Phase:
I Print ready electronic format CSI format Design Development
specifications (electronic file and a hard copy).
2. E size architectural drawings prepared on AutoCAD r14
(electronic files and one set of computer plots of drawings each at
50%, 90%, and 100% completion).
C. Construction Documents Phase:
1. Project Manual with CSI format Construction Documents
specifications (electronic file and a hard copy).
2. E size architectural drawings prepared on AutoCAD r14
(electronic files and one set of computer plots of drawings each at
50%, 80%, and 100% completion).
page 4
Attached are E.xhibits B and c which desc~e our fees and proiected schedule. Please
let us know ~f you require any furff~er irfformation or clarification. We look forward to ff~e
execution of lhe conffact and to working wilh you and ff~e Redevelopment Agency on
most e.xcf~g'project.
Sincerely, , ·
AYla
Dealey, Renton & Associa_es
P. O. Box 12675
Oakland, CA 94604-2675
510 465-3090
THIS CERTIFICA S ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMA'
ONLY AND CO,. .RS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFIC
HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND
ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELL
INSUREC
John Sergio Fisher AIA &
Associates
5567 Reseda Blvd., Ste.209
' INSURER
Tarzana, CA 91356 IINSURERE:'
INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE
~ ~nSURSR A:Agricultural
I INSURER B:
INSURER C:
Insurance Company
COVERAGES
THE PO(JC]ES OF INSURANCE L~¥~'U BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE PO[JCY PERIOD INDICATED. NoTwmHSTAND:/,
ANY REQUIREMENT. TERM OR CONDITION 'OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED C
MAY PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLJCJES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, E)(CLUSlONS AND CONDITIONS OF
GENERAL LIABILITY i I i i EACH OCCURRENCE $
i CLAIMEMAG~ ;occuRiNote. As respects certain project,m includingiF~REOAMAGE(A"y°n'!irels
, i(01d Town Temucula Community Theater), an
l _~j laddit-ional limit of
~EN%AGGPEGA~ELIMITAP~LIESRER:I '$1,000,000 each c aim
~ !LOC ! $1,000,000 ~
A§gregate
AUTDMOm'"UAE~UT~ !iS provided by endorsement to the ~ policy.
i EODILYINJURY
i ALL OWNED A~TOS
IIANYAUTO
~r' DEDUCTIBLE
RET-NTrON
A ; OTHER professional iEDN3209266
iLiability * i* See note above.
04/18/00
AUTO ONLY- EA ACC!~ENT'
OTHER THAN EAACC S
AUTOONLY: AGG ; S
' EACH OCCURRENCE
AGGREGATE
WC ETATU- OTH-
:E,L.DISEASE.EAEMPLOYEE $
04/18/03;$1,000,000 per claim
! $1,000,000 annl aggr
Project: Old Town Temucula Community theater.
~ $57000 Ged. @ claim
CERTIFICATE HOLDER : ! AGOfTION~LINSUF~_:O:ln~JF~RL~i i~_~
CANCEl t ~,T1ON
Redevelopment Agency of
The City of Temecula
P.o. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
DATE THEREOF,'FHE ISSUING t NSURER WiLL E N OEAVOR TO MAI L~ ~J DAYSWRFFT[
ITEM 3
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR. OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
Agency Directors
Shawn D. Nelson, Executive Director
June 12, 2001
Review and Adoption of the FY 2001-02 Annual Operating Budget
PREPARED BY:
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance~~-'
Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE FY 2001-02 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND
ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS
DISCUSSION: The Temecula Redevelopment Agency (RDA) consists of three funds, the
Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund, the Capital Projects Fund, and the Debt Service Fund.
RDA Revenues
Overall, a $429,600 or 4.5% increase in total RDA revenue is projected. Gross property tax
increment revenue is projected to increase by $512,000 (5.8%). This increase is a reflection of retail
and industrial development in the project area, as well as a reversal of the assessed valuation
declines that occurred in the project area throughout the late 1990's. A decrease will be realized in
investment interest, due to the continued expenditure of RDA tax increment on capital improvement
projects.
RDA Expenditures
A summary of the significant items included in the proposed budget is as follows:
Low/Moderate Income Housinq
> A net decrease in operating expenditures is proposed, due to reductions in consulting
services and the first time homebuyer program
Redevelopment
> A net decrease in operating expenditures is proposed, due to reductions in consulting
services and the fagade improvement program.
$200,000 is included for Old Town development incentives
$75,000 is included for the fagade improvement program
A $35,530 increase is proposed for Old Town Implementation Plan activities
Debt Service
> A $375,000 increase is reflected in passthrough agreements as a result of increased tax
increment revenue
> Includes $225,000 repayment to City's General Fund for several land acquisitions (6th Street,
Mercantile Building)
FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed RDA operating budget reflects a spending plan that is
balanced within projected revenues, and provides resources for various capital improvement
projects.
Attachments:
Resolution No. RDA 2001-
FY 2001-02 Annual Operating Budget
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE FY 2001-02 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND
ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula
has reviewed the proposed final FY 2001-02 annual operating budget and has held such public
meetings as are necessarY prior to adoption of the final operating budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Temecula as follows:
Section 1. That the FY 2001-02 RDA operating budget is hereby adopted.
Section 2.
appropriations:
A.
That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget
No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered
apprepdation available to cover the expenditure.
B. The Department Director may prepare a transfer of appropriations within
departmental budget accounts, with the approval of the Executive Director.
C. The Agency Members must authorize transfers (appropriations) of funds from the
Unreserved Fund Balance and transfers between departmental budget accounts.
D. The Agency Members must authorize any increase in regular personnel positions
above the level indicated in the final budget. The Executive Director may
authorize the hiring of temporarY or part time staff as necessary within the limits
imposed by the controls listed above.
E. The Executive Director may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to
$25,000. Any expenditure of funds in excess of $25,000 requires Agency
Member action.
F. Pursuant to Section 3.32.050 of the Temecula Municipal Code, the Executive
Director may authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to $25,000. Any
expenditure of Public Works funds in excess of $25,000 require Agency Member
action, except that the Executive Director may approve change orders on Public
Works contracts approved by the Agency Members in amounts up to project
contingency established by the Agency Members.
Section 3. Outstanding encumbrances shown on the Agency books at June 30, 2001 are
hereby appropriated for such contracts or obligations for FY 2001-02.
Section 4. The Agency Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Temecula this 12th day of June 2001.
ATTEST:
Ron Robeds, Chairperson
Susan W. Jones, CMC
Agency Secretary/City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. RDA 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the
Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting
thereof held on the 12th day of June 2001, by the following vote:
AYES:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
NOES:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
ABSENT:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
Agency Secretary/City Clerk
PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
FTSCAL YEAR 2001-02
REVENUES BY FUND- REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Actual Actual Estimated Projected
FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02
Low/Moderate Income
Set Aside $ 3,029,270 $ 1,716,979 $ 2,054,200
Redevelopment* 391,181 188,008 219,200
Debt Service 5,587,724 7,200,904 9.117,750
Total $ 9,008.175 $ 9,105,891 $ 11,391,150
$ 2,069,000
224,000
9,778,000
$ 12,071,000
*Does not include operating transfers from Debt Service Fund.
FOUR YF~R COMPARISON
$11,
$9.008
FY 1998-99
$11.391
$9.106
$12.071
· Debt Sen,ice I
I
F1 Redevelopment*
· Low/Moderate Income Set Aside
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY CATEGORY- REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUNDS
Fund
Operations Capital Operating
Personnel & Maintenance Outlay Transfers Total
Low/Moderate lncome
SetAside $ 1%,310 $ 446,840 $ 5,000 $ 648,150
Redevelopment 80,040 941,410 5,000 1,026,450
Debt Service* 8,508,640 8,508,640
Total $ 276,350 $ 9,896,890 $ 10,000 $ $ 10,183,240
*Debt Service does not include $ 808,000 operating transfer to the Redevelopmem Fund.
DEPARTMENT: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DIRECTOR OF
HOUSING/REDEVELOPMENT
John Meyer
HOUSING
Temecula O.N.E.
~lomebuyer
Residential Improvement
Programs
Land Acquisition
Affordable Housing
Project Development
Projects
Old Town Specific Plan
Implementation
Old Town Advisory Committee
Community Liaison
3
DEPARTMENT: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Program: Low/Moderate Income Housing Set Aside
Funding Source:
Tax Increment
Expenditure Summary
Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed
FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02
Personnel $ 177,681 $ 196,712
Operations and Maintenance 422,582 213,102
Capital Outlay 805
$ 600,263 $ 410,619
$ 215,320 $ 196,310
594,410 446,840
1,050 5,000
$ 810,780 $ 648,150
Program: Redevelopment
Funding Source:
Tax Increment
Expenditure Summary
Personnel
Operations and Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed
FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02
85,956 $ 76,245 $ 74,750 $ 80,040
706,221 478,038 1,176,580 941,410
64,024 8,884 500 5,000
$ 856,201 $ 563,167 $ 1,251,830 $ 1,026,450
Program: Debt Service*
Expenditure Summary
Personnel
Operations and Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Funding Source: Tax Increment
Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed
FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02
$ 4,891,673 $ 5,814,047 $ 7,532,550 $ 8,508,640
$ 4,891,673 $ 5,814,047 $ 7,532,550 $ 8,508,640
*Does not include operating transfer to the Redevelopment Fund.
4
DEPARTMENT: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
LOW/MOD HOUSING
Director of Housing/Redevelopment
Senior Management Analyst
Administrative Secretary
REDEVELOPMENT
Director of Housing/Redevelopment
Senior Management Analyst
AdminisU'ative Secretary
Redevelopment Agency Total
Authorized Authorized
2000-01 Changes 2001-02
0.75 0.00 0.75
0.75 0.00 0.75
0.50 0.00 0.50
2.00 0.00 2.00
0.25 0.00 0.25
0.25 0.00 0.25
0.50 0.00 0.50
1.00 0.00 1.00
3.00 0.00 3.00
DEPARTMENT: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
PROGRAM: HOUSING
MISSION: The Housing Program is responsible for developing, rehabilitating, and preserving
affordable housing opportunities.
2000-01 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
Funded 6 flint time homebuyem
Funded 55 residential improvements, consisting of painting, roofing and fencing repairs
Negotiated with three development partners and one property owner for the development
of affordable housing units
GOAL 1:
OBJECTIVES:
PROVIDE QUALITY HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOW AND MODERATE
INCOME FAMILIES AND TO EXPAND THEIR AVAILABILITY
Ensure compliance with State Redevelopment Law
Monitor existing affordable housing covenants
Administer the First Time Homebuyer and Employee Relocation Programs
Administer the Residential Improvement Program
Acquire land and develop projects to support new affordable housing opportunities
Encourage private investment in the expansion of affordable housing
Partner with non-profit and for-profit developers to construct affordable family and
senior housing
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
Number of additional affordable housing
units provided
Number of affordable housing units
rehabilitated
Number of first time homebuyers assisted
Number of employee relocation homebuyers
assisted
Pr~ected Actual Prqected Prqected
FY 1999-00 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02
76 78 8 22
55 56 55 56
6 6 6 4
0 0 5 5
DEPARTMENT: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
PROGRAM: REDEVELOPMENT
MISSION: The Redevelopment Program is responsible for encouraging private investment,
removing blight, and promoting economic revitalization in the redevelopment project
urea.
2000-0I ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
Continued implementation of the Old Town Improvement Project
Completed the pubic parking facility in Old Town
Assisted the Community Services Department by handling the acquisition and
renovation of the Old Town Trading Post for a future Children's museum
Selected an architect and managed schematic design and master site plan of Old Town
Community Theater
GOAL 1:
OBJECTIVES:
IMPLEMENT THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
Work with Old Town merchants, property owners, civic groups and the development
community to make private and public improvements in Old Town, develop projects that
will revitalize Old Town economy, and assist in the private rehabilitation of buildings in
Old Town
Promote and encourage participation in the Facade Improvement Program
Recruit new businesses to open in Old Town
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
Number of facade improvement projects
completed
Number of historical structures assisted
Number of redevelopment projects negotiated
and completed
Projected Actual Projected Projected
FY 1999-00 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02
10 10 8 15
2 0 2 1
2 0 2 2
DEPARTMENT: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
MISSION:
PROGRAM: DEBT SERVICE
The Debt Service Program is the operating budget for the Redevelopment Agency.
Items budgeted include debt service principal and interest, property tax administrative
fees, and pass through agreements.
2000-0! ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
.," All debt service and related costs for the 1993 Tax Allocation Bonds were made in a
timely manner
GOAL !:
ENSURE TIMELY PAYMENT OF DEBT SERVICE AND RELATED COSTS
ITEM 4
APPROVAL
CITY
OF FINANCE~ ~
ATTORNEY
DIR.
CITY MANAGER ~'~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
Agency Directors
Shawn D. Nelson, Executive Director
June 12, 2001
Review and AlOof the FY 2002-06 Capital Improvement Budget for the
Redevelopment Agency (RDA)
PREPARED BY:
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance ~
Gus Papagotos, Senior ManagementS'- 'Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2002-06 AND ADOPTING
THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FY 2001-02.
DISCUSSION: The Capital improvement Program (CIP) is the City's plan for providing public
improvements which exceed $25,000 in cost, have long-term life spans, and are nonrecurring. The
proposed CIP document serves as a planning tool for the coordination of financing and scheduling
of all capital improvement projects over the next five years.
COSTS
The total Redevelopment Agency cost as identified in the CIP is $13,291,200 which includes seven
(7) RDA projects and five (5) RDA Housing Projects. A total cost of $6,747,000 is programmed in FY
2001-02 CIP.
REVENUE
Projected revenue from the RDA and RDA Housing sources for the Five Year RDA Capital
improvement Program is $18,335,000. Through the five year program, there is adequate funding for
all proposed projects. However because of revenue and cost timing considerations there are four
projects that do not have funding sources identified.
FISCAL IMPACT: The adoption of the FY 2002-06 Five Year Capital Improvement Program
establishes the project appropriations for FY 2001-02. Projects which do not have sufficient funds
within the funding source will not proceed until the funding has been secured.
Attachments:
Resolution No. RDA 2001-
FY 2002-06 Capital Improvement Program
2
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 200'1-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2002-06 AND ADOPTING
THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FY 200t-02.
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula
has reviewed the proposed FY 2002-06 Capital Improvement Program and has held such public
meetings as are necessary prior to adopting the Capital Improvement Budget for FY 2001-02.
WHEREAS, the careful timing of the installation of such improvements is necessary so
as to best serve the public health, safety and welfare; and
WHEREAS, in order to prioritize these public infrastructure and improvements, Capital
Improvement Program is necessary;,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Capital Improvement Program FY 2002-06 is hereby approved. A copy
of the FY 2002-06 Program is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and will be kept on file in the office of
the City Clerk.
Section 2. Adoption of this Program is categorically exempt from environmental review
under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). Pursuant to Section 15262 of the State
Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, a project involving only feasibility or planning studies for
possible futura actions, which actions the City Council has not approved, adopted or funded, does
not require preparation of an EIR or Negative Declaration, but does require consideration of
environmental factors. In reviewing this Program and conducting public hearings on it, the City
Council has considered relevant environmental factors.
Section 3. That certain document now on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of
Temecula entitled "City of Temecula Capital Improvement Program FY 2002-06" included herein
appropriations for FY 2002-06 is hereby adopted.
Section 4. On May 16, 2001 the Planning Commission found the Capital Improvement
Program consistent with the General Plan in accordance with Government Code Section 65404(c)
of State Planning and Zoning Law.
Section 5. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of
budget appropriations:
A. No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered
appropriation available to cover the expenditure.
B. The City Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to
$25,000. Any expenditure of funds in excess of $25,000 requires Board of Directors action.
C. The City Manager may approve change orders on Redevelopment Agency
contracts in amounts up to $25,000, ifsufficient appropriated funds are available.
D. That the City Manager may authorize transfers of up to $25,000 between
approved Capital Improvement Program projects.
E. Notwithstanding Section 5B, pursuant to Section 3.13.080 ofthe Municipal
Code, the City Manager may authorize Redevelopment Agency contracts in amounts up to $25,000.
Any expenditures of Redevelopment Agency funds in excess of $25,000 require City Council action,
except that the City Manager may approve change orders on Redevelopment Agency contracts
approved by the Board of Directors in amounts up to project contingencyestablished by Board of
Directors.
Section $. Councilmember Stone abstains with respect to projects within the Old
Town area due to propertyownership in Old Town Temecula.
resolution.
Section 7.
Certification. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 12th dayof June 2001.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Chairperson
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution
No. 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 12th day of June, 2001, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
TEMECULA PUBLIC
FINANCING AUTHORITY
ITEM 1
A P P RO~.. ~...._._
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR.OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
and
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/-remecula Public Financing Authority
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
June 12, 2001
Actions Relating to Acceptance of a Deposit Related to Proceedings for a
Community Facilities District for Harveston
RECOMMENDATION:
1.
That the City Council adopt the resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 0t-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
TEMECULA APPROVING
AGREEMENT
CITY OF
DEPOSIT/REIMBURSEMENT
That the Authority adopt the resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY ACKNOWLEDGING
RECEIPT OF A DEPOSIT RELATIVE TO THE FORMATION OF A
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO
BACKGROUND: Lennar Homes of California, Inc. (the "Developer") has requested that a
community facilities district be formed to assist in the financing of public improvements in
connection with the proposed Harveston development. The City and the Redevelopment
Agency created the Authority, by execution of a joint exercise of powers agreement, to provide
an independent governmental entity that could consider proposed community facilities district
financings and act as the issuer of any related bonds.
It is expected that on or before July 10, 2001, the Authority will consider the adoption of a
resolution related to the formation of a community facilities district. The CFD will only include
land owned by the Developer and land owned by Winchester Hills I, LLC. The Developer has
requested that the CFD be formed and issue bonds to refinance the outstanding Winchester
Hills Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 98-1 (Winchester Hills) Special Tax
Bonds and to finance certain additional public improvements, so that the Developer can provide
the City of Temecula with additional public amenities pursuant to a proposed Development
Agreement currently being negotiated by City Staff and the Developer.
The Developer has agreed to pay all City and Authority costs related to the proposed CFD
formation and bond issue, and a Deposit/Reimbursement Agreement has been prepared with
respect thereto. The bonds would be payable solely from special taxes levied on land in the
CFD and collected by the Authority.
SPECIFIC ACTIONS: In order to begin the process to consider the formation of the community
facilities district and the issuance of the bonds, the City Council will consider adoption of a
resolution approving a Deposit/Reimbursement Agreement, and the Authority will then consider
adoption of a resolution accepting the Developer's deposit, approving a
Deposit/Reimbursement Agreement with the City and the Developer and engaging
professionals to assist the City and the Authority in forming the CFD and issuing bonds of the
Authority for the CFD.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Developer has agreed to pay all-out-of-pocket expenses incurred
relative to the proposed financing. Costs of issuance of the proposed bond issue will be paid
from the proceeds of the bonds to be issued by the Authority. All annual costs of administering
the bonds issued will be paid by special taxes levied on the properties in the community
facilities district.
Any CFD bonds will not be obligations of the City, but will be limited obligations of the Authority,
payable solely from special taxes levied on land in the community facilities district.
Attachments:
Resolutions (2)
Deposit/Reimbursement Agreement
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING DEPOSIT/REIMBURSEMENT
AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, Lennar Homes of California, Inc. (the "Developer") has requested that the
Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") form a community facilities district and is
willing to advance funds to pay costs of the City of Temecula (the "City") and the Authority
related thereto; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to enter into a DepositJReimbursement Agreement with the
Authority and the Developer (the "Deposit Agreement"), regarding the disposition of funds to be
advanced by the Developer.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as
follows:
Section 1. Deposit A.qreement. The City Council hereby approves and authorizes the
City Manager to execute and deliver the Deposit Agreement in the form on file with the City
Clerk together with any changes therein deemed advisable by the City Attorney, the approval of
such changes to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery by the City of the
Deposit Agreement.
Section 2. Official Actions. The Mayor, City Manager, City Clerk and all other officers
of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things necessary or
desirable hereunder with respect to the implementation of the Deposit Agreement, including but
not limited to the execution and delivery of any and all agreements, certificates, instruments and
other documents, which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or desirable and not
inconsistent with the purposes of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula, at
a special meeting held on the 12th day of June 2001.
ATTEST:
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. 01- was duly adopted at a special meeting of the City Council of
the City of Temecula on the 12th day of June, 2001, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
-2-
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY ACKNOWLEDGING
RECEIPT OF A DEPOSIT RELATIVE TO THE FORMATION OF A
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO
WHEREAS, Lennar Homes of California, Inc. (the "Developer") has represented that it
will submit to the Finance Director of the City of Temecula (the "City") monies (the "Deposit") to
be used by the City to pay costs of the City and the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the
"Authority") in connection with proceedings under Section 53311 et seq. of the California
Government Code (the "Act") to create a community facilities district to be designated
"Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 01-2 (Harveston)" (the
"CFD"); and
WHEREAS, there has also been submitted a Deposit/Reimbursement Agreement (the
"Agreement"), among the Developer, the City and the Authority, and this Board of Directors now
desires to authorize the Finance Director of the City to accept the money to be advanced by the
Developers, to authorize the execution and delivery by the Authority of the Agreement, employ
certain consultants necessary for the formation of the CFD and the sale of bonds of the
Authority for the CFD, and authorize and direct Authority staff to take actions necessary to
present to this Board of Directors for approval the documents necessary to form the CFD and
issue bonds of the Authority for the CFD.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula
Public Financing Authority as follows:
Section 1. The Director of Finance of the City of Temecula is hereby authorized and
directed to accept the Deposit, and to use the Deposit in the manner contemplated by the
Agreement. The Executive Director of the Authority is hereby authorized and directed to
execute the Agreement for and on behalf of the Authority, and to take all actions necessary, in
his discretion, to implement the Agreement.
Section 2. City staff, acting for and on behalf of the Authority, are hereby authorized
and directed to take all actions necessary or advisable to present to the Board of Directors for
its review and approval all proceedings necessary to create the CFD and issue bonds of the
Authority therefor. The passage of this Resolution shall in no way obligate this Board of
Directors to form the CFD or issue bonds of the Authority for the CFD.
Section 3. The firm of Stone & Youngberg LLC is hereby designated as underwriter to
the Authority for any bonds to be issued for the CFD.
Section 4. The firm of Albert A. Webb Associates is hereby designated as Special Tax
Consultant to the Authority for the CFD, the firm of Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates is hereby
designated as financial advisor to the Authority for the CFD, and the firm of Quint & Thimmig
LLP is hereby designated as Bond Counsel to the Authority for the CFD. The Executive
Director is hereby authorized and directed to execute agreements with said firms for their
services in connection with the CFD, in form and substance acceptable to the Executive
Director. The fees and expenses of such consultants shall be payable solely from the Deposit
and/or the proceeds of bonds, if any, issued by the Authority for the CFD.
Section 5. The Executive Director is hereby authorized and directed to engage a
market absorption consultant to analyze the proposed development in the CFD, on such terms
as are acceptable to the Executive Director. The fees and expenses of such consultant shall be
payable solely from the Deposit and/or the proceeds of bonds, if any, issued by the Authority for
the CFD.
Section 6. The Executive Director, Treasurer, Secretary, legal counsel to the Authority,
and all other officers and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed to take all
actions necessary or advisable to give effect to the transactions contemplated by this
Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Temecula
Public Financing Authority at a meeting held on the 12th day of June, 2001.
ATTEST:
Jeff Comerchero, Chairperson
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Authority Secretary
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan Jones, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, HEREBY DO
CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 01- was duly adopted at a special
meeting of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority on the 12th day of
June, 2001, by the following vote:
AYES:
BOARDMEMBERS:
NOES:
BOARDMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
BOARDMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Cler~Authority Secretary
-2-
DEPOSIT/REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
Temecula Public Financing Authority
Community Facilities District No. 01-2
(Harveston)
THIS DEPOSIT/REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is by and among
the City of Temecula (the "City"), the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") for
itself and on behalf of the proposed Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities
District No. 01-2 (Harveston) (the "CFD"), and Lennar Homes of California, Inc. (the
"Developer").
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, the Developer has requested that the Authority consider the formation of
the CFD and the issuance of bonds for the CFD (the "Bonds") under Sections 53311 et seq. of
the California Government Code (the "Act"); and
WHEREAS, the Developer is willing to deposit funds with the Authority to ensure
payment of the costs of the Authority and the City in forming the CFD and otherwise in
connection with the issuance of bonds for the CFD and the proposed expenditure of the
proceeds thereof, provided that such funds so advanced are reimbursed to the Developer from
the proceeds of any bonds issued by the Authority for the CFD to the extent provided herein;
and
WHEREAS, the Authority and the Developer now desire to specify the terms of said
deposit and reimbursement.
AGREEMENT:
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants set
forth herein, and for other consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
Section t. The Deposit: Additional Advances. The Developer has provided to the City
$95,000 (the "Deposit"), to be used by the City to pay the costs in conducting proceedings for
the formation of the CFD and the issuance of bonds for the CFD (as more fully described in
Section 2(a) below, the "Initial Costs"), said amount having been heretofore delivered by the
Developer to the Finance Director of the City by means of a check made payable to the "City of
Temecula." The City, by its execution hereof, acknowledges receipt by the City of the Deposit.
The check representing the Deposit will be cashed by the City, and the Deposit may be
commingled with other funds of the City for purposes of investment and safekeeping, but the
City shall at all times maintain records as to the expenditure of the Deposit.
The Developer hereby agrees to advance any additional amounts necessary to pay any
Initial Costs incurred by the City or the Authority, in excess of the amount of the Deposit,
promptly upon written demand therefore by the Finance Director of the City; provided that the
amount of the Deposit, plus any such additional amounts (the "Additional Deposits" and,
collectively with the Deposit, the "Deposits"), shall not exceed $150,000 without the prior written
consent of the Developer. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City Manager may direct City and
Authority staff and consultants to cease all work related to the formation of the CFD and the
issuance of the Bonds until any additional amounts so demanded has been received by the
City.
Section 2. Use of Funds. The Deposits shall be administered as follows:
(a) The Finance Director of the City may draw upon the Deposits from time to time to
pay the Initial Costs, including but not limited to: (i) the fees and expenses of any consultants to
the City or the Authority employed in connection with the issuance of the Bonds and the
proposed expenditure of the proceeds thereof (such as engineering, legal counsel, including
the City Attorney, Bond Counsel and financing and special tax consultants); (ii) the costs of
market absorption and feasibility studies and other reports necessary or deemed advisable by
City staff or consultants in connection with the Bonds; (iii) costs of publication of notices,
preparation and mailing of ballots and other costs related to any election with respect to the
CFD, the rate and method of apportionment of the special taxes to be levied therein and any
bonded indebtedness thereof; (iv) a reasonable charge for City staff time, as determined by the
City Manager in his sole discretion, in analyzing the CFD, the Bonds and the expenditure of the
proceeds thereof, including a reasonable allocation of City overhead expense related thereto;
and (v) any and all other actual costs and expenses incurred by the City or the Authority with
respect to the CFD or the Bonds after the date of execution of this Agreement. The Developer
hereby acknowledges that, at a minimum, the following amounts will or may be charged against
the Deposits, whether or not the CFD is formed and the Bonds are issued: (i) up to $20,000.00
to Albert A. Webb Associates, special tax consultant, (ii) up to $15,000.00 to Richards, Watson
& Gershon, City Attorney and general counsel to the Authority, (iii) up to $10,000.00 for a
market absorption analysis related to the CFD, (iv) up to $25,000.00 to Fieldman, Rolapp &
Associates for financial advisory services, and (v) up to $25,000.00 to the City for City Staff
time in analyzing the CFD, the Bonds and the expenditure of the proceeds thereof, including a
reasonable allocation of City overhead expense related thereto, and any other actual costs and
expenses incurred by the City or the Authority.
(b) If the Bonds are issued under the Act by the Authority secured by special taxes
levied upon the land within the CFD, the Authority shall provide for reimbursement to the
Developer, without interest, of all amounts charged against the Deposits, said reimbursement to
be made solely from the proceeds of the Bonds and only to the extent otherwise permitted
under the Act. On or within ten (10) business days after the date of issuance and delivery of
the Bonds, the Finance Director of the City shall return the then unexpended Deposits to the
Developer, without interest, less an amount equal to any costs incurred by the City or the
Authority or that the City or the Authority is otherwise committed to pay, which costs would be
subject to payment under Section 2(a) above, but have not yet been so paid.
(c) If the Bonds are not issued, the Finance Director of the City shall, within ten (10)
business days after adoption of the resolution stating the intent of the Authority to terminate
proceedings under the Act with respect to the issuance of the Bonds, return the then
unexpended Deposits to the Developer, without interest, less an amount equal to any costs
incurred by the City or the Authority or that the City or the Authority is otherwise committed to
pay, which costs would be subject to payment under Section 2(a) above but have not yet been
so paid.
-2-
Section 3. Reimbursement of Other Developer Costs Nothing contained herein shall
prohibit reimbursement of other costs and expenses of the Developer, or any other entity with
an interest in all or any portion of the land in the CFD, incurred in connection with the CFD from
the proceeds of the Bonds, including, but not limited to fees and expenses of legal counsel to
the Developer and special tax consultant expenses. Any such reimbursement shall be made
solely from the proceeds of the Bonds and only to the extent otherwise permitted under the Act
and otherwise provided for, at the reasonable discretion of the Authority, in the proceedings for
the issuance of the Bonds.
Section 4. Agreement Not Debt or Liability of City or Authority. It is hereby
acknowledged and agreed that this Agreement is not a debt or liability of the City or the
Authority, as provided in Section 53314.9(b) of the Act. Neither the City nor the Authority shall
in any event be liable hereunder other than to return the unexpended and uncommitted portions
of the Deposits as provided in Section 2 above and provide an accounting under Section 7
below. Neither the City nor the Authority shall be obligated to advance any of their own funds
with respect to the CFD or for any of the other purposes listed in Section 2(a) hereof. No
member of the City Council, the Board of Directors of the Authority or officer, employee or
agent of the City or the Authority shall to any extent be personally liable hereunder.
Section 5. No Obligation to Issue Bonds. The provisions of this Agreement shall in no
way obligate the City or the Authority to form the CFD, to issue any bonds, or to expend any of
their own funds in connection with the CFD.
Section 6. Severability. If any part of this Agreement is held to be illegal or
unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall be
given effect to the fullest extent reasonably possible.
Section 7. Accounting. The City Finance Director shall provide the Developer with a
written accounting of moneys expended under this Agreement, within ten (10) business days of
receipt by the Finance Director of the City of a written request therefore submitted by an
authorized officer of the Developer. No more than one accounting will be provided in any
calendar month and the cost of providing the accounting shall be charged to the Deposits.
Section 8. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure
to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties hereto.
Section 9. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed an original.
-3-
IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day
and year written alongside their signature line below.
Executed on:
June 12, 2001
DEVELOPER:
LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
By:
Its:
Executed on:
June 12, 2001
CITY:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Shawn D. Nelson, City Manager
Executed on:
June 12, 2001
AUTHORITY:
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING
AUTHORITY, for itself and on behalf of the
proposed Temecula Public Financing Authority
Community Facilities District 01-2 (Harveston)
By:
Shawn D. Nelson, Executive Director
ITEM 24
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR. OF FINANCE~
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
Shawn D. Nelson, City Manager
June 12, 2001
Review and Adoption of the FY 2001-02 Annual Operating Budget
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:That the City Council:
1.
Roberts, Director of Finance ~
Genie
Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director
Adopt Resolution 2001- entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FY 2001-02 ANNUAL OPERATING
BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN
APPROPRIATIONS
Adopt Resolution 2001- entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED
POSITIONS
Adopt Resolution 2001-
entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR
FY 2001-02
DISCUSSION: Attached is the proposed FY 2001-02 Annual Operating Budget. The
budget includes revenue projections and expenditure requests for the General Fund, Gas Tax
Fund, and Internal Service Funds.
The City of Temecula remains in extremely healthy financial condition. Based upon the Finance
Department's revised estimate of revenues and expenditures for the current fiscal year, it
appears that most revenue estimates will be met or exceeded, and that actual expenditures will
be approximately $2,000,000 less than the budgeted appropriation amounts.
On May 15, 2001, the City Council held a workshop to review and discuss the proposed
operating budgets. At that time, the City Council provided staff with direction to increase the
"REST" contribution to the TSCD in an effort to provide increased summer recreation
opportunities to the youth of Temecula through the Summer Month Activities and Recreation in
Temecula ("SMART") program. This program will provide expanded mobile recreation activities
at various City parks for an estimated cost of $75,000. The City Council also provided
direction to staff to provide free public swimming opportunities for residents (resulting in an
estimated revenue reduction of 825,000). As a result, the Revenue Excess Sharing for
Temecula ("REST") contribution to the Temecula Community Services District has thus been
increased by $100,000.
General Fund Revenues
The projected General Fund revenues for FY 2001-02 reflect a $2,203,642 or6.9% increase from the
FY 2000-01 revenue estimates. Some of the significant revenue increases are summarized below:
$1,670,000 increase in sales tax (to $17,370,000)
$523,000 increase in motor vehicle in lieu revenue
$309,000 increase in franchise fees
$180,000 increase in property taxes
General Fund Expenditures
The proposed budget reflects an increase in General Fund expenditures of $3,172,680 or 10.8%
from the FY 2000-01 budget. The primary increases affecting the General Fund include: 1) police
contract costs due to the addition of seven sworn positions (five as a result of the Vail Ranch
annexation), with four additional sworn support positions being added through the contract rate fora
total increase of 11 sworn positions, 2) Public Works street maintenance costs (due in part to the
Vail Ranch annexation), 3) an increase in the CFD 88-12 sales tax reimbursement due to strong
retail sales growth within the district, and 4) an increase in the "REST" contribution.
Personnel costs increases that impact the budget include: 1) the addition of a sixth step to the salary
range for all regular authorized positions (per the City's current labor agreement), 2) the increase to
$650 per month in the benefit allowance for all regular authorized positions (as approved by the City
Council on November 28, 2000, and 3) an increase in the base pay for City Councilmembers to $500
per month effective November, 2001 (as approved by the City Council on June 27, 2000).
Eight new positions are proposed to be added to the schedule of authorized positions. Six of these
positions are being added primarily as a result of the Vail Ranch annexation, with the other two being
added as a result of two new facilities (Children's Museum, Chaparral High School Swimming Pool).
The total annual cost of these positions is approximately $443,000. A summary of these positions is
as follows:
Department
Planning
Public Works
Public Works
TCSD
TCSD
TCSD
TCSD
Position
Code Enforcement Officer
Lead Maintenance Worker
Maintenance Workers (2)
Landscape Inspector
Maintenance Worker
Museum Services Manager
Aquatics Supervisor
Increased authorization is requested for two existing part-time positions. It is proposed to increase
the authorization of the ClP Specialist from .5 full-time equivalent ("fie") to .75 fie, and to increase
the authorization for the Web Analyst from .75 fte to full-time status. The total annual cost of these
position authorization increases is approximately $29,000. The total increase of 8.5 fie positions
brings the staffing total to 147.25 citywide.
Five position upgrades are proposed, at a total annual incremental cost of $25,000. A summary of
the proposed position upgrades is as follows:
Department
Finance
Finance
Human Resources
Planning
Support Services
Proposed Position
Fiscal Services Manager
Business License SpecialistJCashier
Human Resources Specialist
Code Enforcement Officer II
Central Services Coordinator
Current Position
Senior Management Analyst
Accounting Assistant
Human Resources Assistant
Code Enforcement Officer
Administrative Technician
The proposed budget continues the City's practice of relying on project or temporary help to meet
short-term needs. Included in the proposed budget is approximately $2.0 million in project and
temporary help costs, which represents 17% of the City's total personnel cost budget.
Following is a summary of the significant items by department in the FY 2001-02 proposed budget:
City Council
~' Includes $25,000 funding for 50% of the CETAP planning grant request from WRCOG
City Manager
~' Includes $25,000 funding to hire a state lobbyist
City Clerk
> Includes $65,000 for election costs
Human Resources
)' Includes $30,000 for an organizational consultant
Planninq
includes $60,000 towards the purchase of fully scalable aerial topographical data. The cost
of this is being shared with the Public Works Department and Rancho California Water
District.
Public Works
Increase of $285,590 in the Maintenance budget due in part to the annexation of Vail Ranch
$65,000 is included for a pavement management system update
$250,000 is included for "Category I" and "Category I1" traffic improvements
Includes funding for a portion of the cost of the aerial topographical data
Police
The following modifications are proposed to sworn staffing levels, maintaining the City's ratio
of one sworn officer per thousand residents:
Addition of five patrol officers
Addition of one motorcycle officer for the Neighborhood Enforcement Team
Addition of one dedicated lieutenant (will pursue a cost-sharing agreement with the County)
Addition of two investigators, one lieutenant, and one sergeant as part of the sworn support
built into the contract rate
Includes the addition of one Community Service Officer I
The City's ratio of one sworn officer per thousand residents will be maintained
Includes funding for a storefront facility in Vail Ranch
Includes funding to support the Community Action Patrel ("CAP") program which would utilize
citizen volunteers to perform certain functions
Includes $85,000 in support costs for various special events
Fire
A $190,470 decrease in Fire Services contract costs is reflected, due to an increase in the
structural fire tax credit
Non-Departmental
> A $400,000 increase in the CFD 88-12 sales tax reimbursement is included due to continued
retail development within the district
> The "REST" program contribution to TCSD is proposed to be increased from $1,729,000 to
$2,117,000
Operatin.q Transfers Out
A $4,800,000 transfer to the Capital Improvement Program is proposed
A $230,000 transfer to the Vehicles Internal Service Fund is proposed to set aside reserves
for the future purchase of a second paramedic squad vehicle, and to fund the purchase this
year of several new vehicles (as detailed in the Vehicles Internal Service Fund).
Internal Service Funds
Following is a discussion of significant items in the proposed Internal Service Fund budgets:
Vehicles
>- Two replacement and five additional vehicle purchases are proposed as follows:
· City Manager: replacement of the current City Manager vehicle (current vehicle to be
used by the Community Action Patrol), projected cost $30,000
· Planning: two four-wheel drive trucks for code enforcement officers (one replaces
existing electdc vehicle), total projected cost $50,000
· Public Works: new one-ton utility truck for maintenance crew, projected cost $60,000
· Public Works: new three-quarter ton extra cab truck for traffic staff, projected cost
$35,OOO
· Fire: new light truck for inspection staff, projected cost $20,000
· TCSD: new full size truck for maintenance staff, projected cost $25,000
Facilities
>' A $70,530 increase is reflected due to anticipated utility cost increases and the expansion of
the Maintenance Facility
4
'Gann' Aoorooriations Limit
In accordance with Government Code Section 7910, the City Council is required on an annual
basis to adopt by resolution the "Gann" Appropriations Limit. The Appropriations Limit creates
a restriction on the amount of revenue that can be appropriated in any fiscal year. The Limit is
increased each year based on the growth of population, inflation, and non-residential assessed
valuation
Using population data provided by the State Department of Finance, and assessed valuation
information provided by the City's property tax consultant HdL, Coren & Cone, the City's
Appropriations Limit for FY 2001-02 has been computed to be $48,470,384. Appropriations
subject to the limit in the proposed FY 2001-02 budget total $23,135,573, which is
$25,334,811 less than the computed limit. Additional appropriations to the budget funded by
non-tax sources such as service charges, restricted revenues from other agencies, grants, or
beginning fund balances would be unaffected by the Appropriations Limit. However, any
supplemental appropriations funded through increased tax sources could not exceed the
$25,334,811 variance indicated above. Further, any overall actual receipts from tax sources
greater than $25,334,811 from the budget estimates will result in proceeds from taxes in
excess of the City's Appropriations Limit, requiring refunds of the excess within the next two
fiscal years, or voter approval to increase the City's Appropriations Limit.
FISCAL IMPACT: Due to anticipated additional revenues to be received and expenditure
savings in the current fiscal year, it is estimated that the June 30, 2001 fund balance will be
approximately $2,700,000 higher than originally expected. The proposed FY 2001-02 budget
provides for an excess of revenues over expenditures in the amount of $1,769,080, and
increases the designation for economic uncertainties by $951,804 to ,~9.7 million (30% of
General Fund expenditures) at June 30, 2002.
Attachments:
-Resolution No. 2001-
-Resolution No. 2001-
-Resolution No. 2001-
-FY 2001-02 Proposed Annual Operating Budget
-Schedule of Authorized Positions
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE FY 2001-02 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND
ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula has reviewed the proposed final FY
2001-02 annual operating budget and has held such public meetings as are necessary prior to
adoption of the final operating budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as
follows:
Section 1. That certain document now on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of
Temecula entitled "City of Temecula FY 2001-02 Annual Operating Budget" is hereby adopted.
Section 2. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget
appropriations:
A. No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered
appropriation available to cover the expenditure.
B. The Department Director may prepare a transfer of appropriations within
departmental budget accounts, with the approval of the City Manager.
C. The City Council must authorize transfers (apprepdations) of funds from the
Unreserved Fund Balance and transfers between departmental budget accounts.
D. The City Council must authorize any changes to the Schedule of Authorized
Positions. The City Manager may authorize the hiring of temporary or part time staff as necessary
within the limits imposed by the controls listed above.
E. The City Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to $25,000.
Any expenditure of funds in excess of $25,000 requires City Council action.
F. Pursuant to Section 3.32.050 of the Municipal Code, the City Manager may
authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditures of Public Works funds
in excess of $25,000 require City Council action, except that the City Manager may approve change
orders on Public Works contracts approved by the Council in amounts up to project contingency
established by Council.
Section 3. Outstanding encumbrances shown on the City books at June 30, 2001 are hereby
appropriated for such contracts or obligations for FY 2001-02.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify adoption of the resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 12th
day of June 2001.
ATTEST:
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the Cty of Temecula
a_.t a re,gular meeting thereof held on the 12th day of June, 2001, by the follow ng vote of the City
L;ouncil:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REVISING
THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS
WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority under Chapter 2.12.030 of the City's Municipal Code,
the City Manager has the authority to hire, set salaries and adopt personnel policies: and,
WHEREAS, the City Manager has recommended and the City Council now wishes to adopt
the Revised Schedule of Authorized Positions;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as
follows:
Section 1. The attached Schedule of Authorized Positions is hereby adopted pursuant to
Section 45001 of the California Government Code. Such list is attached to this Resolution and
incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 2. The Schedule of Authorized Positions shall become effective July 1, 2001, and
may be thereafter amended.
Section 3. The City Manager shall implement the attached Schedule of Authorized Positions
and has the authority to select and appoint employees in accordance with the City's personnel
policies.
Section 4. All prior resolutions and parts of this resolution in conflict with this Resolution are
hereby rescinded.
Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of June 2001.
ATTEST:
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 12th day of June 2001, by the following vote of the City
Council:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FY 2001-O2
WHEREAS, the voters approved the Gann Spending-Limitation Initiative (Proposition 4) on
November 6, 1979, adding Article XIII B to the Constitution of the State of California to establish and
define annual appropriation limits on state and local governmental entities;
WHEREAS, SB 1352 provides for the implementation of Article XIII B by defining various
terms used in this article and prescribing procedures to be used in implementing specific provisions
of the article, including the establishment by resolution each year by the governing body of each local
jurisdiction of its appropriations limits;
WHEREAS, the required computations to determine the Appropriations Limit for FY 2001-02
have been performed by the Finance Department and are on file with the office of the City Clerk, and
available for public review;
WHEREAS, these computations are provided on Exhibit "A" which is herein incorporated by
reference and attached hereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as
follows:
Section 1. The Appropriations Limit for the City of Temecula for FY 2001-02 is hereby
adopted.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a
certified resolution to be filed in the office of the City Clerk.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12h day of June 2001·
ATTEST:
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
i, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resoluhon No. 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the C ty of Temecula
th
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 12 day of June, 2001, by the follow ng vote of the City
Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCiLMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMPUTATION OF GANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
FY 1992-93 Appropriations Limit ..............................................................$10,109,911
FY 1993-94 Population Change* ........................................................................ 8.25%
FY 1993~94 Per Capita Personal Income Change* ................................................2.72%
Cumulative Compound (1.0825 x 1.0272) ......................................................... 11.19%
FY 1993-94 Appropriations Limit .......................................... ; ................... $11,241,655
FY 1994-95 Population Change* .......................................................................... 8.15 %
FY 1994-95 Increase in Non-Residential Assessed Valuation* * ................................ 21.7%
Cumulative Compound (1.0815 x 1.2170) ........................................................... 31.61 %
FY 1994-95 Appropriations Limit ................................................................ $14,796,098
FY 1995-96 City Population Change* ................................................................. 10.49%
FY 1995-96 Per Capita Personal Income Change* .................................................. 4.72%
Cumulative Compound (1.1049 x 1.0472) ........................................................... 15.71%
FY 1995-96 Appropriations Limit ................................................................ $17,119,161
FY 1996-97 City Population Change* .................................................. ; ................ 6.54%
FY 1996-97 Increase in Non-Residential Assessed Valuation* * .............................. 17.07%
Cumulative Compound (1.0654 x 1.1707).; ......................................................... 24.73%
FY 1996-97 Appropriations Limit ................................................................ $21,352,109
FY 1997-98 City Population Change* ................................. 3.01%
FY 1997-98 Per Capita Personal Income Change* ......................... 4.67%
Cumulative Compound (1.0301 x 1.0467) .............................. 7.82%
F Y 1997~98 Appropriation Limit ................................ $23,021,965
FY 1998-99 City Population Change* ................................. 6.41%
FY 1998-99 Per Capita Personal Income Change* ......................... 4.15%
Cumulative Compound (1.0641 x 1.0415) .............................. 10.83%
FY 1998-99 Appropriation Limit
................................. $25,514,326
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMPUTATION OF GANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
FY 1999~00 City Population Change* .................................. 4.88%
FY 1999-00 Increase ~n Non-Residential Assessed Valuation** ................... 7.92%
Cumulative Compound (1.0488 x 1.0792) .............................. 13.19%
FY 1999-00 Appropriation Limit.
................................ $28,878,773
FY 2000-01 City Population Change* .................................. 9.55%
FY 2000-01 Increase in Non-Residential Assessed Valuation** ................... 7.73%
Cumulative Compound (1.0955 x 1.0773) .............................. 18.02%
FY 2000-01 Appropriation Limit
................................. $34,082,212
FY 2001-02 City Population Change* .................................. 24.74%
FY 2001-02 Increase m Non-Residential Assessed Valuation * * .................. 14.01%
Cumulative Compound (1.2474 x 1.1401) .............................. 42.22%
FY 2001-02 Appropriation Limit
................................. $48,470,384
* Source:
** Source:
State of California Department of Finance
HdL Coren & Cone
City of Temecula
FINAL DRAFT
Schedule of Authorized Positions
Authorized
Count Minimum
Buildinq & Safety
Administrative Secretary
Building Inspector II
Community Development Technician
Deputy Building Official
Director of Building & Safety
Office Assistant
Office Specialist
Plan Checker/Building Insp.
Senior Building Inspector
Building & Safety Subtotals:
Ma~mum
City Clerk
Administrative Secretary
Central Services Coordinator
City Clerk/Director Of Support Services
Deputy Director Of Support Services
Information Systems Administrator
Information Systems Specialist
Office Assistant
Office Specialist
Records Coordinator
Web Analyst
City Clerk Subtotals:
1.0 $2,390 $3,129
5.0 $2,962 $3,874
4.0 $2,694 $3,527
1.0 $4,668 $5,970
1.0 $5,864 $7,464
1.0 $1,662 $2,181
1.0 $1,818 $2,383
1.0 $3,325 $4,255
1.0 $3,572 $4,680
16.0
City Council
City Council
City Council Subtotals:
06/06/2001
City Manaqer
Administrative Secretary
Assistant City Manager
Asst. To The City Manager
City Manager
Executive Assistant
Human Resources Analyst
Human Resources Specialist
Marketing Coordinator
Senior Management Analyst
City Manager Subtotals:
Exem~
Nonexempt
NE
NE
NE
E
E
NE
NE
NE
E
1.0 $2,390 $3,129 NE
1.0 $1,954 $2,515 NE
1.0 $5,840 $7,474 E
1.0 $4,014 $5,261 E
1.0 $3,968 $5,198 E
2.0 $3,536 $4,526 E
1.5 $1,662 $2,181 NE
1.0 $1,818 $2,383 NE
1.0 $2,361 $3,091 NE
1.00 $2,948 $3,770 NE
11.50
$0
5.0 $560~
5.0
1.0 $2,390 $3,129
1.0 $7,133 $9,124
1.0 $4,794 $6,138
1.0 $g,488 **
1.0 $2,966 $3,881
1.0 $3,293 $4,215
1.0 $2,619 $3,427
1.0 $3,510 $4,491
1.0 $3,864 $5,061
9.0
E
NE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
NOTE: ~'lncludeaRDAendTCSDmee~ngfees
Page I
City of Temecula
FINAL DRAFT
Schedule of Authorized Positions
Authorized
Count Min/mum
Community Services
Administrative Secretary 1.0
Aquatics Supervisor 1.0
Custodian 1.0
Deputy Dir. Of Comm. Svcs. 1.0
Development Services Administrator 1.0
Director Of Community Services 1.0
Facility Maintenance Coordinator 1.0
Landscape Inspector 2.0
Lead Maintenance Worker 2.0
Maintenance Superintendent 1.0
Maintenance Supervisor 1.0
Maintenance Worker 3.0
Management Analyst 1.0
Museum Services Manager 2.0
Office Specialist 3.0
Park/Landscape Maintenance Supervisor 1.0
Recreation Coordinator 3.0
Recreation Superintendent 1.0
Recreation Supervisor 2.0
Senior Landscape Inspector 1.0
Community Services Subtotals: 30.0
$2,390
$2,924
$1,723
$4,727
$4,027
$6,245
$2,314
$2,638
$2,344
$4,139
$3,531
$2,071
$3,295
$3,0O6
$1,818
$3,531
$2,103
$4,o14
$2,924
$3,033
Finance
Accountant 1.0
Accounting Assistant 1.0
Accounting Specialist 3.0
Administrative Secretary 1.0
Assistant Finance Director 1.0
Business License Specialist/Cashier 1.0
Director Of Finance 1.0
Fiscal Services Manager 1.0
Purchasing Specialist 1.0
Senior Accountant 1.0
Finance Subtotals: 12.0
$3,006
$1,898
$2,257
$2,390
$4,687
$2,276
$6,368
$4,325
$2,276
$3,749
Maximum
$3,129
$3,827
$2,257
$6,049
$5,275
$7,987
$3,028
$3,375
$3,071
$5,420
$4,517
$2,713
$4,215
$3,936
$2,383
$4,517
$2,753
$5,261
$3,827
$3,881
$3,936
$2,486
$2,955
$3,129
$5,997
$2,912
$6,147
$5,567
$2,912
$4,796
06/06/2001
Exempt/
Nonexempt
NE
NE
NE
E
E
E
NE
NE
NE
E
E
NE
E
NE
NE
E
NE
E
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
E
NE
E
E
NE
E
Page 2
City of Temecula
FINAL DRAFT
Schedule of Authorized Positions
Authorized
Count Minimum
Planninq
Administrative Secretary 1.0 $2,390
Assistant Planner 1.0 $3,130
Associate Planner 4.0 $3,635
Code Enforcement Officer I 2.0 $2,884
Code Enforcement Officer II 1.0 $3,227
Deputy City Manager 1.0 $6,793
Development Processing Coordinator 1.0 $3,290
Director of Planning 1.0 $6,245
GIS Administrator 1.0 $3,850
GIS Analyst 1.0 $2,948
Office Assistant 1.0 $1,662
Office Specialist 1.0 $1,818
Senior Management Analyst 1.0 $3,864
Senior Planner 2.0 $4,183
Planning Subtotals: 19.0
Public Works
Administrative Secretary 1.0 $2,390
Assistant Engineer 7.0 $3,590
Associate Engineer 6.0 $4,157
ClP Specialist 0.75 $2,694
Deputy Director Public Works 1.0 $5,564
Director Of Public Works/City Engineer 1.0 $6,679
Lead Maintenance Worker 4.0 $2,344
Maintenance Superintendent 1.0 $4,139
Maintenance Supervisor 1.0 $3,531
Maintenance Worker 5.0 $2,071
Management Analyst 1.0 $3,295
Office Assistant 2.0 $1,662
Office Specialist 2.0 $1,818
Principal Engineer 1.0 $5,299
Public Works Inspector 1.0 $2,976
Senior Engineer 4.0 $4,840
Senior Public Works Inspector 3.0 $3,602
Public Works Subtotals: 41.75
Maximum
$3,129
$4,098
$4,757
$3,777
$4,155
$6,691
$4,210
$7,987
$4,950
$3,770
$2,181
$2,383
$5,061
$5,479
$3,129
$4,697
$5,446
$3,527
$7,119
$8,544
$3,071
$5,420
$4,517
$2,713
$4,215
$2,181
$2,383
$6,779
$3,895
$6,191
$4,720
06/06/2001
Exempt/
Nonexempt
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
E
NE
E
E
NE
NE
NE
E
E
NE
NE
E
NE
E
E
NE
E
E
NE
E
NE
NE
E
NE
E
NE
Page 3
City of Temecula
FINAL DRAFT
Schedule of Authorized Positions
Authorized
Count Minimum
Redevelopment
Administrative Secreta~j 1.0
Director, Housing Redevelopment 1.0
Senior Management Analyst 1.0
Redevelopment Subtotals: 3.0
$2,390
$6,245
$3,864
Maximum
$3,129
$7,987
$5,061
06/06/2001
Exempt/
Nonexempt
NE
£
E
Totals:
Building & Safety ................................. 16.0
City Clerk ........................................... 11.50
City Council ........................................ 5.0
City Manager ....................................... 9.0
Community Services ............................. 30.0
Finance .............................................. 12.0
Planning ............................................. 19.0
Public Works ...................................... 41.75
Redevelopment ....................................3.0
Total of Authorized Positions: 147.25
Page 4
ITEM 25
CITY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY:
City Council
Shawn Nelson, City Manager
June 12, 2001
Adoption of the FY 2002-06 Capital Improvement Program
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance~~'
Gus Papagolos, Senior Manageme6t Analyst
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM FOR FY 2002-06 AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FY 2001-02.
DISCUSSION: The Capital improvement Program (CIP) is the City's plan for providing public
improvements which exceed $25,000 in cost, have long-term life spans, and are nonrecurring.
The proposed CIP document serves as a planning tool for the coordination of financing and
scheduling of all capital improvement projects over the next five years.
CIP DEVELOPMENT
The CIP was developed by taking recommendations provided by the staff and the City Council
during a series of workshops. The primary focus of these workshops was to identify community
needs in the areas of roads/streets; bridges; public buildings; parks and recreation facilities; and
redevelopment projects. All projects were reviewed to ensure consistency with the provisions of
the City's General Plan, as well as the long-term vision of the City as 'developed by the City
Council.
The Parks and Recreation Commission at their May 14, 2001 meeting reviewed the Parks and
Recreation portion of the document and approved the proposed projects.
Finan ce/Pepagg/Budget/C Ip 02~)5/CIP02 Resolution AGN
On May 15, 2001 the City Council held a workshop to review and discuss the draft CIP. At the
workshop the City Council provided direction to staff to allocate additional funding to study and
design road median opportunities specifically on Winchester Road and State Highway 79 South.
Also at the May 15, 2001, City Council CIP Workshop staff was directed to add a City Garden
project with site to-be-determined in the unspecified funding category.
On May 16, 2001 the Planning Commission found the proposed CIP to be consistent with the
General Plan in accordance with Government Code Section 65403 of the State Planning and
Zoning Law. The Planning Commission also recommended two changes to the CIP; 1) adding a
Pedestrian and Bicycle Overcrossing at Nicolas and Winchester Roads and 2) changing the priority
of the Pedestrian and Bicycle I-15 Overcrossing into Old Town from priority II to Ill.
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission at their May 24, 2001 meeting reviewed the Circulation
and Infrastructure portion of the document and found it acceptable. However, discussion was
provided with regards to the Planning Commission's recommendation to add a Pedestrian and
Bicycle Overcrossing at Winchester and Nicolas Roads. The Public/Traffic Safety Commission has
some reservations with the construction of the overcrossing at this location.
At the May 22, 2001, City Council Meeting staff was directed to investigate the feasibility of the
pedestrian overcrossing. Based on preliminary research, staff is recommending that Cai Trans
perform a warrant analysis of the pedestrian overcrossing at Winchester and Nicolas Roads.
COSTS
Overall, the total cost as identified in the CIP is 9382,129,820. A total of 121 projects are
included in the program, consisting of forty-eight (48) Circulation Projects, twenty-four (24)
Infrastructure/Other Projects, thirty-seven (37) Park Projects, and twelve (12) Redevelopment
Agency/Housing Projects. The following illustrates the associated costs for each project
classification and total cost:
Project
Circulation
Infrastructure/Other Projects
Parks
Redevelopment/RDA Housing
Total
REVENUE
Cost
9236,400,020
$ 93,282,870
9 39,155,730
$ 13,291,200
Projected revenue from identified sources for the Five Year Capital Improvement Program is
$152,790,780. Through the first two years of the five year program, there is adequate funding
for all proposed projects. The CIP is fully funded in FY 2001-02 at 943,995, 170 and in FY 2002-
03 at 924,973,060. However, for the remaining three years, in the unspecified category, the
deficiency begins and continues to increase to the five year total of 9235,865,960.
Included in this five year plan are twenty-four (24) projects which currently do not fit into the five
year window, but warrant consideration and review in this document. These projects are
proposed to be funded by both assessment districts and unspecified funds in future years for a
total cost of ~ 166,831,400, which is included in the total unspecified amount of ~ 235,865,960.
FISCAL IMPACT: The adoption of the FY 2002-06 Five Year Capital Improvement Program
establishes the project appropriations for FY 2001-02. Projects which do not have sufficient
funds within the funding source will not proceed until the funding has been secured.
Attachment:
Resolution 2001-
Draft Capital Improvement Program 2002-06
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2002-06 AND
ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FY 2001-2002
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula requires public infrastructure improvements in the areas of
streets, highways, transportation facilities, parks, recreational facilities and public buildings and
facilities; and
WHEREAS, the careful timing of the installation of such improvements Is necessary so as to
best serve the public health, safety and welfare; and
WHEREAS, in order to prioritize these public infrastructure and improvements, Capital
Improvement Program is necessary;,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Capital Improvement Program FY 2002-06 is hereby approved. A copy of
the FY 2002-06 Program is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and will be kept on file in the office of the City
Clerk.
Section 2. Adoption of this Program is categorically exempt from environmental review
under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). Pursuant to Section 15262 of the State
Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, a project involving only feasibility or planning studies for
poss!ble future actions, which actions the City Council has not approved, adopted or funded, does not
require preparation of an EIR or Negative Declaration, but does require consideration of environmental
factors. In reviewing this Program and conducting public hearings on it, the City Council has
considered relevant environmental factors.
Section 3. That certain document now on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of
Temecula entitled "City of Temecula Capital Improvement Program FY 2002-06" included herein
appropriations for FY 2001-02 is hereby adopted.
Section 4. On May 16, 2001 the Planning Commission found the Capital Improvement
Program consistent with the General Plan in accordance with Government Code Section 65404(c) of
State Planning and Zoning Law.
Section 5.
appropriations:
That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget
No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered
appropriation available to cover the expenditure.
B. The City Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to
$25,000. Any expenditure of funds in excess of $25,000 requires City Council action.
C. The City Manager may approve change orders on Public Works contracts in
amounts up to $25,000, if sufficient appropriated funds are available.
That the City Manager may authorize transfers of up to $25,000 between
approved Capital Improvement Program projects.
E. Notwithstanding Section 5B, pursuant to Section 3.13.080 of the Municipal Code,
the City Manager may authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditures
of Public Works funds in excess of $25,000 require City Council action, except that the City Manager
may approve change orders on Public Works contracts approved by the Council in amounts up to
project contingency established by Council.
Section 6. Councilmember Stone abstains with respect to projects within the Old
Town area due to propertyownership in Old Town Temecula.
Section 7. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting held on the 12th dayof June 2001.
ATTEST:
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No.
2000- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting
thereof held on the 12th day of June, 2001, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
ITEM 26
APPROVAL j~'~,~..,,~,-~"~
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR.OF FINANCE ~
CITY MANAGER ~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager~:~
June 12, 2001
Community Advisory Committee for the General Plan Update Process
PREPARED BY: David Hogan, Senior Planner
RECOMMENDATION: Provide direction to staff concerning the structure, membership, and
role of a Community Advisory Committee.
BACKGROUND: The Council approved the contract with Cotton Bridges Associates in March
of 2001 to assist the City in updating its General Plan. The consultant is currently acquiring
information and beginning the process of doing background and issues analysis before the public
plan development process begins. Once this background data collection process is complete, the
issue identification, goal and policy review, and alternative plan processes will occur. The current
General Plan Update program includes numerous communityworkshops and meetings with the City
Council and Planning Commission. To assist in the process, staff is suggesting that an advisory
committee be formed to assist in this process of reviewing documents and making alternate plans.
The purpose of this staff report is to present this item to the Council for their consideration. Staff
presented this matter to the members of the General Plan Subcommittee in April of 2001.
Role of the Community Advisory Committee
The primary role of the Community Advisory Committee should be to meet with and assist City staff
and the consultant in the following Plan Development activities:
· Future visioning and issue identification processes;
· Review of the goals and policies; and,
· Assisting in the development of the alternative land use and circulation plans.
Both members of the General Plan Subcommittee felt that a community advisory committee would
be helpful to the process of updating the City's General Plan and would compliment the already
proposed community workshops.
R:\GENPLAN\Comp Plan Update\GP Advisory Committee Structure CC.doc 1
Structure of the Community Advisory Committee
In considering the size of an advisory committee, staff was concerned with two primary factors. The
first factor was the evenness of the representation on the committee. The second factor was the
advisory committee's size. After a lot of discussion, staff identified a potential advisory committee
structu re that should enable diverse community input while minimizing the potential for unproductive
conflict. Based upon staff's experience with advisory committees, an ideal committee would have
between 8 and 12 members. The advisory committee structure that was proposed by staff would
consist of 10 members representing the following.
1 Member of the Planning Commission (Appointed by the Commission)
1 Member of the Traffic Safety Commission (Appointed by the Commission)
1 Member of the Community Services Commission (Appointed by the Commission)
1 Representative of the Chamber of Commerce (or the Economic Development Council)
(Appointed by the Chamber or EDC)
1 Representative of a local environmental or community organization (This person could
also represent a valley-wide organization and would be appointed by the Council)
5 City residents (One appointed by each Council member for a total of 5)
The structure of the Community Advisory Committee was an area of significant disagreement
between the two Subcommittee members. Councilmember Naggar wanted the members of the
General Plan Subcommittee to be part of the advisory committee, while Mayor Comerchero felt that
the City Council members should not be part of the Community Advisory Committee.
Function of the Community Advisory Committee
Staff envisions that the Community Advisory Committee would meet between 3 and 5 times
throughout the plan development process. Meetings would probably be held in the evenings and
would normally be no more frequent than once every other month. It is expected that the function of
the Committee would be concluded prior to the public hearing process. Both members of the
General Plan Subcommittee were in general agreement as to the role of the advisory committee.
Conclusion
If the City Council feels that a Community Advisory Committee should be formed, staff will inform the
various City Commissions and outside organizations of the Council's intent and, if directed by the
Council, will publicize the availability of citizen positions on the committee. Staff envisions that the
Council would formally designate the advisory committee at a later date after the membership has
been determined.
FISCAL IMPACT: There will some incidental staff and consultant costs associated with this activity.
The consultant costs will be handled through the existing contract by making a minor modification to
the approved scope of work.
R:\GENPLAN\Comp Plan Update\GP Advisory Committee Structure CC.doc 2