HomeMy WebLinkAbout020993 CC AgendaAGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER - 28816 PUJOL STREET
FEBRUARY 9, 1993 - 7:00 PM
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will
determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 '
PM and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting.
All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM
EXECUTIVE SESSION: 5:30 - Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956,9(a) {b) 'and (c)'to discuss potential litigation.
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 93-04
Resolution: No. 93-11
CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor J. Sal Mu~oz presiding
Invocation
Pastor Tim Riter, Rancho Christian Church
Flag Salute
Councilmember Birdsall
ROLL CALL:
Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Mu~oz
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Library Volunteer Month
PUBLIC FORUM
This is a portion of the City Council meeting unique to the City of Temecula. At the
meeting held on the second Tuesday of each month, the City Council will devote a
period of time (not to exceed 30 minutes) for the purpose of providing the public with
an opportunity to discuss topics of interest with the Council. The members of the City
Council will respond to questions and may give direction to City staff. The Council is
prohibited, by the provisions of the Brown Act, from taking any official action on any
matter which is not on the agenda. If you desire to speak on any matter which is nO1;
listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak' form should be filled out and filed with
the City Clerk.
/~enda/020983
02/03/~3
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of January 12, 1993;
2.2 Approve the minutes of January 14, 1993;
2.3 Approve the minutes of January 19, 1993;
2.4' Approve the minutes of January 26, 1993.
Resolution Aoorovina List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
AOee~da/020993
02/04/93
4
Revised Vesting Final Tract MaD No. 73103
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Extend the Revised Vesting Tentative Map, and approve the Final Tract
Map No. 23103, subject to the Conditions of Approval.
5
Balloon & Wine Festival
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve the City's participation in the 1993 Balloon and Wine Festival.
The City of Temecula's participation will be in the amount of $10,000
for advertisement in the official program.
6
Substitution of Improvement Bonds in Tract No. 23.767-1
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Accept Surety Bonds for the improvement of streets and sewer and
water systems, and survey monumentation in Tract No. 23267-1 as
substitutes for bonds submitted to the City Council on October 22,
1991;
6.2
Direct the City Clerk to release the original bonds.
Solicitation of Construction Bid's for the Installation of a Traffic Signal at Marqarita
Road and La Serena Way (PW 92-06)
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
Approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the
Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the
traffic signal at Margarita Road and La Serena Way upon receiving
Caltrans approval.
Solicitation of Construction Bid's for the Installation of a Traffic Sional at Winchester
Road (Hwv. 79N) and MarQarita Road (PW 92-08)
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
Approve the construction plans and specification and authorize the
Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the
traffic signal installation at Winchester Road (Hwy. 79N) and Margarita
Road upon receiving Caltrans approval.
Agenda/020993 3 02/04/113
10
11
Contract Amendment No. 3 to ~ommunitv Facilities District 88-12 (Ynez Corridor)
Enc~ineerino Services Contract with J.F. Davidson Associates. Inc.
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Approve Contract Amendment No. 3 with J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc.
to provide additional engineering services in the amount of $17, 151.
Final Parcel Mao No. 25212
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Approve Final Parcel Map No. 25212 subject to the Conditions of
Approval.
Reconfirmation of Local Emerc~encv
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
RECONFIRMING THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY
COUNCIL BUSINESS
12
Consideration of Ordinance Makina Technical and Conforminq Amendments to City
Ordinances in Preparation of Codification of the Municioal Code
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1
Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, MAKING VARIOUS TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING
AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S MUNICIPAL CODE IN PREPARATION FOR
CODIFICATION OF THE SAME
,e~enda/020993 4 02/04/93
13
14
Urgency Ordinance Declarina a Moratorium on the Establishment of Nightclubs, Teen
Clubs, Dance Halls, Bars and Cocktail Lounges, Billiard Halls. Massaae Parlors. and
Video Game Arcades Without a Conditional Use Permit
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1
Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DECLARING A MORATORIUM ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
NIGHTCLUBS, TEEN CLUBS, DANCE HALLS, BARS AND COCKTAIL LOUNGES,
BILLlARD HALLS, MASSAGE PARLORS, AND VIDEO GAME ARCADES
WITHOUT A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Boys and Girls Club Proiect
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1
Review project timing and appoint two members of the City Council to
an ad hoc review committee for the Boys and Girls Club Project.
15
Ad Hoc Committee - CFD 88-12
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Discuss formation of an Ad Hoc Committee and if desired, select two
members to serve in this capacity.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting: February 16, 1993, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol
Street, Temecula, California
Next regular meeting: February 23, 1993, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol
Street, Temecula, California
AgendM)20893 6 02/04/93
TEMECULA COMMUNITY 'SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING j.iTo' I~' held at 8ioo)
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. CSD 93-01
Resolution: No. CSD 93-01
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
PUBLIC COMMENT:
President Ronald J. Parks
DIRECTORS:
Mur~oz, Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Birdsall
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should
present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and statq
your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of January 12, 1993;
1.2 Approve the minutes of January 26, 1993.
Loma Linda Park Improvements
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Authorize the purchase of picnic tables, benches, trash receptacles and
barbecue units from Walt Rankin and Associates at $10,419 for Loma
Linda Park;
2.2
Award contract of $39,097 to Oakridge Landscape and Irrigation for the
installation of landscaping, picnic tables, benches, trash receptacles and
barbecue units at Loma Linda Park.
AOenda/O2OBe3 6 02/04/'13
DISTRICT BUSINESS
3 Paloma Del Sol Park Master Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Approve master plan for the Paloma Del Sol Park Site;
3.2 Approve preliminary fee credits of $1,368,000 towards City Public
Facilities Fees for the development of this park site;
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Dixon
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT:
Next regular meeting: February 23, 1992, 8:00 PM, Temecula
Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
,e~endN020983 7 02/04/93
TEMECULA: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 'MEETING
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
Chairperson J. Sal Mur~oz presiding
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Next in Order:
Resolution: No. RDA 93-01
Birdsall, Mu~ioz, Roberrs, Stone, Parks
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a
completed pink "Request to Speak' to the City Clerk. When you
are called to speak, please come forward and state your name
and address for the record.
AGENCY BUSINESS
I Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
Approve the minutes of January 26, 1993.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting: February 23, 1992, 8:00 PM, Temecula
Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
l~ef~lNO20893 8 02/04/~3
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
The City of Temecula
PROCLAMATION
WI~iREA$, February is 'We Love our Volunteers Month' at the RiveBide City and
County Public Library, and;
WHEREAS, the Temecula Library is hosting library volunteen from the area at a
special recognition ceremony on February 19, and;
WHE!~RAS, the volunteers who willingly carry out the hundreds of tasks that must be
done, from mending books to creating indexes, play a significant role in the library, and;
WHEREA~, volunteen set a positive example for all of us who care about libraries and
the men, women and children who use them, and;
.' WHEREAS, volunteers deserve our respect and admiration for. their decision to take part
fully in the life of our community;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, J. Sal Mu~oz, on behalf of the City Council of the City of
Temecula, hereby proclaim the month of February, 1993 to be
"LIBRARY VOLUNTERR MONTH*
IN WITNESS WIIRRFI)F, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City
of Temecula to be affixed this 9th day of February, 1993.
J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ITEM
NO.
ITEM NO.
2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
CITY COUNCIL
HELD JANUARY 12, 1993
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order Tuesday, January 12,
1993, 7:00 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula,
California. Mayor J. Sal Muftoz presiding.
PRESENT: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Muf~oz
ABSENT: 0
CO UNCI LMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field and City Clerk
June S. Greek.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor Dan Hoekstra, Fellowship Community Church.
FLAG SALUTE
Councilmember Birdsall led the flag salute.
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
An Award of Valor was presented to Monty Lesmeister for his rescue of the Wade family
children during a fire which destroyed their home.
Former Mayor Patricia H. Birdsall presented incoming Mayor J. Sal Mu~oz with the gavel.
Mayor Birdsall presented the following individuals with plaques expressing her appreciation
for their assistance during her term:
Chief Building Official Tony Elmo
City Clerk June Greek
Fire Chief Jim Wright
Battalion Chief Mark Brodowski
Battalion Chief John Winder
Planning Director Gary Thornhill
Director of Public Works Tim Serlet
Former Assistant City Manager Mark Ochenduszko
Police Chief Rick Sayre
Director of Community Service Shawn Nelson
CCM IN 1112193 - 1 - 1120193
CITY COUNCIl MINUTFS JANUARY 19.1993
Director of Finance Mary Jane McLamey
Assistant City Manager Woody Edvelson
City Attorney Scott Field
City Manager David Dixon
Official Volunteer Administrative Assistant Barbara Peerson
Additionally, Mayor Birdsall thanked her husband for his support during her term as mayor.
David Fahrion, owner and 'operator of Temecula Environmental and General Manager Ed
Campbell, presented City Manager David Dixon and Joe Hreha with a plaque of the article
submitted to Public Works Magazine by Joe Hrehe, detailing the city's program with Temecula
Environmental from its inception.
Mayor Mu~oz read a letter written by Gary Ritter of Ritter and Associates thanking Police
Officers Roberts and Busby for their response to an emergency 911 call.
PUBLIC FORUM
None
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Stone requested a correction of the minutes of December 8, 1992, on Page
13, Item No. 19, roll call vote should reflect that Councilmember Stone voted yes.
Councilmember Parks requested Item 7 be removed from Consent Calendar for discussion.
Councilmember Birdsall advised that she would be abstaining from Item 8.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts requested Item 9 be removed from Consent Calendar for discussion.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks,
seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to approve Consent Calendar Items I - 6, 8 and 10-17,
with Councilmember Birdsall abstaining on Item 8.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Mur~oz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
1. Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
1.1
Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
CCMIN 1 I1 2193 -2- 1120193
.CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
2. Minutes
2.1
2.2
2.3
Approve the minutes of November.24, 1992
Approve the minutes of December 1, 1992-
Approve the minutes of December 8, 1992
JANUARY 12, 1993
Resolution Aooroving List of Demands
3..1
Adopt of resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY 'COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA'
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30. 1992
4.1
Receive and file the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1992.
Combining Balance Sheet Seotember 30. 1992 and the Statement of Revenues,
Expenditures and Chanoes in Fund Balance for the Three Months Ended Seotember 30.
1992
5.1
Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30,
1992 and Statement of Revenues, Expenditures in Fund Balance for the
Three Months Ended September 30, 1992.
City Treasurer's Reoort as of November 30. 1992
6.1
Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of November 30, 1992.
"Stop" Sign Control at the Intersection of Del Rev Road and Avenida Barca, and
Margarita Road and La Serena Way
8.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING 3-WAY "STOP" SIGNS AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF DEL REY
ROAD AND AVENIDA BARCA AND MARGARITA ROAD AND LA SERENA WAY
CCMIN 1112193 -3- 1120193
CITY COUNCIl MINUTES JANUARY 12, 1993
10. Release of Traffic Sianal Mitiqation Bond for Tract No. ~0735-1
10.1
Authorize the release of monument bond for Tract No. 20735-1 and
direct the City Clerk to so advise the Riverside County Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors.
11. Release of Monument Rond for Tract No. ~1675-1
11.1
Authorize the release of monument bond for Tract No. 21675-1 and
direct the City Clerk to so advise the Riverside County Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors.
12. Release of Monument Securitv for Tract No. ~1675-~
12.1
Authorize the release of the monument security for Tract No. 21675-2
and direct the City Clerk to so advise the Riverside County Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors.
13. Release Of Monument Bond for Tract No. 91675-3
13.1
Authorize the release for monument security for Tract No. 21675-3 and
direct the City Clerk to so advise the Riverside County Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors.
14. Release of Monument Bond for Tract No. 21675-4
14.1
Authorize the release of monument security for Tract No. 21675-4 and
direct the City Clerk to so advise the Riverside County Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors,
15.
Award of Professional Services Agreement for Land Surveying and Geotechnical Soils
Testina Services on the Temecula Senior Citizen Center (Project No. PW92-07)
15.1
Award a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $16,294.00
to Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates for land surveying services
on the Temecula Senior Citizen Center (Project No. PW92-07), and
authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said Agreement;
15,2
Award a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $3,473.00
to Geotechnical and Environmental Engineering for geotechnical soils
testing services on the Temecula Senior Citizen Center (Project No.
PW92-07, and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said
Agreement;
15.3..
Approve a change order in the amount of $10,150.00 to the original
contract agreement with W. Dean Davidson and Associates for
CCMINlll 2~93 ..4- 1120'93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JANUARY 19, 1993
additional design and engineering work required to complete a site
grading and drainage plan for Project No. PW92-07;
15.4
Appropriate ~29,917,00 to Account #210-199-801-5802 for Items 1
through 3 and advance $29,917,00 from the General Fund to the
Capital Projects Fund.
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
16. Second Reading of Ordinance, ADoroving Paloma Del Sol Develooment Agreement
16.1
Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 92-19
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY .COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO, 92-0013, THE DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO, 219, AMENDMENT NO. 3; TO
APPROVE A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AND BEDFORD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR A TEN YEAR PERIOD, TO
COLLECT DEVEL'OPMENT FEES, RECEIVE CREDIT FOR QUIMBY ACT
REQUIREMENTS BY DEVELOPING AND DEDICATING PUBLIC PARKS AND
OPEN SPACE AND THE TIMING OF IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED TO THE
SOUTH OF PAUBA ROAD, NORTH OF STATE HIGHWAY 79, WEST OF
BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD
17. Second Reading of Ordinance ADOrOvinO Soecific Plan No. 219
17.1
Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 92-20
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219, AMENDMENT NO. 3; AMENDING
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219 TO ADD AN EIGHT ACRE PARK TO PLANNING AREA
6, TO MAKE THE SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENT WITH THE EAST SIDE MAPS
AND TO MAKE ALL THE SECTIONS OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENT
WITH EACH OTHER AND LOCATED TO THE SOUTH OF PAUBA ROAD, NORTH
OF STATE HIGHWAY 79, WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND EAST
OF MARGARITA ROAD
e
Award of a Professional Services Contract to the Elliott Group to Provide Landscape
Plan Review Services and Update City Standards as they 'Relate to Landscape Plan
Review
Councilmember Parks questioned why the contract was being awarded to an outside
CCMIN 1 I12/93 -6- 1120193
CITY COUNCIl MINUTI:S JANUARY 1.9.1993
firm rather than a local firm. Additionally, he questioned whether the contract was for
plan review or to provide plan review and to update city standards.
Gary Thornhill stated that local firms were invited to participate in the interview
process, however, did not parform as well as the firm that was awarded the contract.
Mr. Thornhill added that the contract was to provide both plan review and update of
city standards as they relate to landscape plan review.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdseli to
continue this item for two weeks, to allow further review of the contract and to review
the list of bidders.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Muttoz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
e
Final Tract MaD No..~6861-3
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts expressed concern that staff findings indicate that the project
will not likely be consistent with the General Plan.
Gary Thornhill advised that the first two phases of the project were approved prior to
the General Plan process. He stated that the property was originally approved as a
high density project however, the developer downgraded it to medium density
residential and that is the recommendation staff will be making for the General Plan.
He added that the project is currently not consistent, but is likely to be consistent with
approval of the General Plan.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
approve Final Vesting Tract Map No. 26861-3 subject to the Conditions of Approval.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Mufioz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
CCMIN1 I12/93 -6- . 1120/93
CITY COUNCIl MINUTES
PUBLIC HI:ARINGS
18.
JANUARY 19, 1993
AoDeal No. 28 for Plot Plan No. 245, Amendment No. 1. Adams Advertisino
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
continue the hearing to the meeting of January 26, 1993.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs, Stone,
Mufioz
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
19.
Aooeal No. 29 for Plot Plan No. 246, Amendment No. 1. Adams Advertising
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
continue the hearing to the meeting of January 26, 1993.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 C. OUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Mur~oz
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
20.
CCMIN 1 I12193
Transoortation Demand Management/Air nualitv Ordinance
Tim -Serlet presented the staff report.
Mayor Mufioz opened the public hearing at' 7:45 P.M.
Councilmember Parks stated that he would like to have a staff' member assigned to
assist the employers through this 'process.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to
approve staff recommendation 20.1 and direct staff to look into making the fees a
non-chargeable item:
20.1 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-01
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RELATING TO MOBILE SOURCE
-7- 1120193
CITY COUNCIl MINUTI:S JANUARY 1 :~, 1993
AIR POLLUTION REDUCTION THROUGH REDUCING EMPLOYMENT RELATED
MOTOR VEHICLE TRIPS AND EMPLOYMENT-RELATED MOTOR VEHICLE
MILES TRAVELED
Mayor Mur~oz declared a recess at 7:55 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 8:10 P.M.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to reconsider
Agerids Items No. 18 and No. 19. The motion was unanimously carried.
Mayor Mufioz opened the public hearing on Items No. 18 and No. 19 at 8:10 P.M.
.Hearing no public comment, it was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by
Councilmember Birdsall to continue the public hearing at 8:10 P.M. on Items No. 18 and No.
19 to the meeting of January 26, 1993.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
21.
Temoorarv Six-month Closure of Calle Pina Colada between La Serena Way and Del
'Ray Road
Councilmember Birdsall stepped down due to a conflict of interest.
Tim Serlet presented the staff report.
Mayor Mur~oz opened the public hearing at 8:25 P.M.
Les Putnam, 31180 Kahwea Road, Temecula, representing the Kahwea Road
homeowners, spoke in favor of the Calls Pina Colada closure and the continued closure.
of Kahwea Road.
Peter Huhn,. 30879 Calls Pina Colada, Temecula, spoke in favor of the Calls Pina
Colada closure due to traffic and excessive speeding, and the safety of children.
Mike Chilver, 41343 Salt River Court, Temecula, spoke in favor of the Calle Pina
Colada closure.
Alton Pace, 30600 Del Rey Road, Temecula, spoke in opposition of the closure to Calle
Pina Colada. Mr. Pace stated that the same traffic concerns apply to Del Ray Road
and Avenida Barca.
Leslie Woods, 29615 Valle Olvera, Temecula, spoke in opposition to the closure of
Calle Pina Colada. Ms. Woods expressed concern that the traffic which now travels
Calle Pina Colada would be transferred onto Avanida Barca which is a school route.
CCMIN 1 / 1 2193 -8- 1/20193
CITY COUNCIl MINUTES
JANUARY 12, 1993
Margaret Benzango, 41498 Avenida Barca, Temecula, spoke in opposition to the
closure of Calla Pine Colada. Ms. Benzango presented a petition containing 75
signatures against the closure of Calla Pine Colada. Ms. Benzango stated that Avenida
Barca is used as a walking route for children traveling to the schools and expressed
concern for their safety with the number of cars and speeds traveled. She added that
two accidents have occurred on Avenida Barca in the last six months.
Peggy Ko, 41621 Avenida Barca, Temecula, spoke in opposition to the closure of Calle
Pine Colada. Ms. Ko stated that she would like to see the use of more Stop Signs on
Del Ray Road, Calla Pine Colada and Avenida Barca.
Sam Cuckovich, 30767 Calla Pine Colada, Temecula, spoke in favor of the closure 'of
Calle Pine Colada. Mr. Cuckovich stated that the residents have been asking for Stop
Signs and speed humps for the last two years.
Dave Christin, 30762 Calla Pina Colada, 'Temecula, spoke in favor of t.he closure of
Calle Pina Colada. Mr. Christin stated that there is a demand for a signal at La Serena
and Margarita and a signal at Avenida Barca with a pedestrian crossing signal in front
of the school.
Jayme Christin, 30762 Calle Pine Colada, Temecula, spoke in favor of the closure of
Calle Pine Colada. Ms. Christin asked that the Council open Kahwea Road if they deny
the request for the closure of Calla Pina Colada.
Mayor Mu~oz declared a recess at 9:06 P.M. to change the tape. The meeting reconvened
at 9:08 P.M.
Robin Godnick, 30859 Calla Pina Colada, Temecula, spoke in favor of the closure of
Calle Pina Colada due to traffic volumes and speeds.
Cheryl Huber, 30070 Via DeLa Mesa Road, Temecula, spoke in favor of the closure of
Calla Pina Colada, expressing concern for the safety of children, animals, noise and air
pollution.
Brett Saundars, 30737 Calla Pina Colade, Temecula, spoke in favor of the closure.
Betty Pettit, 30642 Calle Pina Colada, Temecula, spoke in favor of the closure.
Heather Johnson, 30702 Calla Pina Colada, Temecula, spoke in favor of the closure.
Craig Hoenig, 30677 Calle Pine Colada, Temecula, spoke in favor of the closure.
Bob Lemons, 31040 Avenida Buena Suerte, Temecula, spoke in opposition to the
closure.
Ed Day, 30856 Via Norte, Temecula, spoke in opposition to the closure.
CCMIN 1 I12/93 -9- 1120/93
CITY COUNCIl MINUTFS JANUARY 19. 1993
Terry Cordell, 41284 Brave Court, Temecula, spoke in opposition to the closure and.
suggested that the signal at-Highway 79 North and Nicolas Road be first priority.
Lettie Boggs, 31350 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, spoke in opposition to the closure.
Ms. Boggs expressed concern that all the traffic would be transferred to Avenida Barca
which is a school route' walked by many students and would pose a safety hazard for
them.
Brenda Baron, 30780 Del Rey Road, Temecula, 'spoke in opposition to the closure,
stating that she felt a more serious concern is the traffic hazards on Avertida Barca.
Tom Pettit, 30642 Calle Pins Colads, Temecula, spoke in favor of the closure.
Mayor
John Cloughen, 41304 Bravos Court, Temecula, suggested that the ingress and egress
on Calls Pins Colads be restricted to residents only.
Mur~oz requested a motion to extend the meeting.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to continue Items
No. 22, 24, and 26 for one week and extend the meeting to 11:00 P.M.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Mur~oz
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsell
Councilmember Parks stated that he is against road closures and suggested that the area
needs increased police patrol and stop signs. He added that he feels that Kahwea Road and
North General Kearney Road should be opened.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts stated that the City should pursue an interim three-way stop sign for
Nicolas and Winchester Road. Mayor Pro Tem Roberts stated that he would be in favor of
installing a three-way stop at Del Rey Road and Calls Pina Colada.
Councilmember Stone asked that the residents give the COuncil sixty days to study the
concerns expressed by the residents and look at the use of speed humps. Councilmember
Stone suggested that an ad-hoc committee be formed and volunteered to participate on that
committee.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts advised that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission has formed an ad-.
hoc committee as well.
CCMIN 1 I12/93 -10. 1120193
CITY COUNCIl MINUTES
JANUARY 12, I
Mayor Muftoz stated that he also had a concern for street closures. He concurred with the
traffic problems on Avenida Barca and the concern for safety of the school children. Mayor
Mur~oz suggested the following interim measures to allow the Council and staff ninety (90)
days to study these measures and make a decision based on that study:
Direct Police Chief Sayre to assign continuous enforcement during peak hours
for a five day period and increased enforcement of this area for the ninety day
study period.
Install Stop signs within 30 days at Del Ray Road and Calla Pina Colada,
Avenida Barca and Margarita, Margarita and La Serena
Post Signs at Calla Pina Colada and La Serena "Resident Traffic Only"
Install a Three-way stop at Nicolas and Winchester Road
Use speed humps wherever possible where speeding is a problem
Form an ad-hoc committee composed of two members from the Council, City
staff, the proponents for and against and the Public/Traffic Saf,ety Commission.
Councilmember Parks asked that staff be allowed time to review all these requests.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tam Roberrs, seconded by Councilmember Stone to direct
staff to install "Stop" signs at Del Ray Road and Avenida Barca, Del Rey Road and
Calla Pina Colada and Margarita and La Serena; posting 25 mph zones, formation of
the ad-hoc committee with Councilmember Stone and Mayor Pro Tam Roberrs, two
representatives from the homeowners for and against the street closure and two
members of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission and staff and targeted enforcement.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Mur~oz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall
Mayor Mu~oz declared a recess at 10:45 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 10:55 P.M.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Mayor Pro Tam Robarts to extend the
meeting to 11:30 P.M.
27. Northwest SDorts Park - Consideration of Suoolemental LeaSe
City Manager David Dixon presented the staff report.
Councilmember Birdsall expressed concern that the Temecula Town Association which
already holds a commitment on the proposed site from July through November, be
treated fairly and their lease not be taken from them.
CCMIN 1 I12/93 -11 - 1120193
CITY COUNCIl MINI rT;S JANUARY 1 :~. '1993
Councilmember Stone advised that ha had received several FAX notices asking that
he deny the request, however after hearing the proposal, he feels the benefits to the
community outweigh the negatives.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
27.1 Approve the leasing of the Northwest Sports Park to Shoemaker
Productions, Inc. and authorize the City Manager to develop a lease
agreement. The lease agreement end Outdoor Event Permit will be
returned to the City Council at a later date for approval.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsell, Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Mufioz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
23.
Marketing Proaram - Phase II
City Manager David Dixon presented the staff report.
Kenneth Dodd, president and owner of Final Touch Marketing, presented a re-cap of
the program to date and outlined the programs direction at this time.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to extend
the meeting to 12:00 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried.
Mayor Mufioz expressed concern that there was not a plan for dealing with leads that
are brought in by the marketing program.
Steve Ahlcluist, 31265 Enfield Lane, Temecula, representing the Temecula - Murrieta
Economic Development Corporation spoke in support of Phase II.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsell, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
23.1 Approve the 1993 Marketing Program - Phase II submitted by Final
Touch Marketing;
23.2 Approve the advance from the General Fund Revolving Fund to the RDA
in the amount of $137,500;
23.3 Appropriate $150,000 for economic development in RDA..
-12- 1120193
CCMIN 1 I12/93
CITY COUNCU MINUTES
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
Birdsall,
Mufioz
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
JANUARY 19. 1993
Parks, Roberrs, Stone,
25.
Discussion of Proposed Graffiti Abatement Program
Assistant City Manager Woody Edvelson presented the staff report.
Councilmember Parks stated he was opposed to purchasing a new vehicle and hiring
more staff and asked that this item be continued.
Councilmember Stone stated that he has received several calls from citizens about the
graffiti problems in the community. He added that the purpose of proposing the
purchase of the vehicle is because the City spends currently $250,000, out of the
County, for striping services and the purchase of the truck will eventually pay for, itself.
It-was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
approve staff recommendation 25.1 and 25.2 as follows and continue 25.3 to a later
date:
25.1
Direct staff to present an anti-graffiti ordinance for consideration at the
next City Council meeting, and discuss whether to use the General Fund
· or the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) as a source of
funding for graffiti removal.
25.2
Establish an ad-hoc committee to promote community awareness and
education.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Mu~oz
NOES:
I COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
None
CITY MANAGER REPORT
None
CCMIN1 I12193 -13- 1120193
CITY COUNCIJ MINUTI:S JANUARY 19.1993
CITY ATTORN;Y RFPORT
None
CITY COUNCIL RFPORTS
Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs advised the Council that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission has
requested a joint meeting with the City Council.
Councilmember Stone asked for a staff report on the Calle Girasol by-pass, research of
drainage problems as a result of the Paloma Del Sol development draining into the Los
Ranchitos development and that the City Attorney look at the potential for a loitering ·
ordinance at the request of law enforcement within the community.
ADJOURNMFNT
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Roberrs to adjourn at
12:35 P.M. The was unanimously approved.
The next .regular meeting of the City of Temecula Council will be held Tuesday January 26,
1993, 7:00-P.M., Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula.
Mayor J. Sal Mu~oz
City Clerk June S. Greek
CCMIN1 I12193 -14- 1120/93
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL JOINT MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MURRIETA
HELD JANUARY 14, 1993
A joint meeting of the Temecula City Council and the City Council of the City of Murrieta was
called to order at 7:06 PM in the Community Room of the Murrieta City Hall, 26442 Beckman'
Court, Murrieta, California. Mayor Joe Perry presiding.
ROLL CALL:
City Clerk A. Kay Vinson of the City of Murrieta called the roll as follows:
PRESENT 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Allen, Smith, Van Haaster, Walsh,
Perry
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
City Clerk June Greek of the City of Temecula called the roll as follows:
PRESENT 4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Mu~oz
ABSENT: I
COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
Also present were City Manager David Dixon, Assistant City Managers Steve Mandoki and
Woody Edvalson, City Attorneys Neil Singer, and Scott F. Field and City Clerks A. Kay Vinson
and June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Willie Gale, representing URGE, the Union for River Greenbelt Environment, requested that a
joint meeting of the two City Councils be scheduled to hear a presentation by Professor Phil
Bedient of Rice University on the study of the Murrieta Creek which he has completed. She
then introduced Nancy Backstrand representing the Friends of the Santa Margarita River who
presented each of the City Councils with brochures and a video tape outlining the ·features of
the Santa Margarita River.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
1. Review Revised I-15 Interchanae
Temecula' City Councilmember Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson of the Joint
Temecula/Murrieta Transportation Committee, made introductory remarks about the
work of the joint committee and then introduced the report by G. Brent Muchow and
Gordon Jones of the firm of NBS Lowry.
Mr. Muchow presented the features of the report as it addresses the placement of an
interchange to serve the I-15 freeway.
21Minutes/011493 -1 - 01122/93
CiW Coundl MinuTes Jenuerv 14. 1993
Gordon Jones described the concept which Utilizes a collector/distribUtor road system.
He also described a second concept Which would Utilize the Winchester Road
interchange as a one-way interchange in conjunction with the proposed overcrossing
at Overland as the reverse one-way direction interchange. The possibility of adding
additior~l lanes to the existing I-15 and 1-215 freeways was also discussed.
In response to a question from Murrieta Councilmember Kevin Walsh, Mr. Jones stated
the possible cost of implementation of the suggested phases would be in a ballpark
range of One hundred million dollars.
· Mr. Muchow reviewed the recommendations contained in the report as follows:
Cooperative processes between the Cities of Temecula and Murrieta
Development of a General plan
Protection of the required rights of way
Development of a well-defined plan.and traffic model
Refining the traffic projections
Developing financing programs
Development of a task force to include the two cities, the County of Riverside,
RCTC, CalTrans, FHWA and SCAQMD.
Councilmember Walsh questioned how the sharing of costs involved might be
approached. Brent Muchow stated the allocation is basically figured on the projections
of the areas from which the traffic is generated.
Temecula Mayor J. Sal Mufioz asked if the arterial improvements being made to
Jefferson and Ynez Roads would suffice as evidence tc~ CalTrans that the City is
actively pursuing solUtions to its arterial traffic flow.
Councilmember Parks questioned if the study addresses the target levels of service
contained in the traffic elements of Murrieta's and Temecula's General Plans. Gordon
Jones responded that all of the information had not been developed by both cities at
the time the report was being completed.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Welsh to approve
the findings and recommendations contained in the Executive Summary and to direct
the respective City staffs to pursue a Detailed Action Plan. The motion carried by the
following roll call votes:
City of Murriets
AYES 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Allen, Smith, Van Haaster, Walsh,
Perry
NOES 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
2/IVlinute8/011493 -2- 01122/93
CiW Council Minute Jenuerv 14, 1993
Citv of Temecula
AYES
4 COUNCILMEMBERS
Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs, Mu~oz
NOES
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
It was moved by Councilmember Parks and seconded by Councilmember Allen to re-
establish the Joint Committee and re-assign the appointees to reflect the changed roles
of several of the members. The motion carried by the following roll call votes.
City of Murriete
AYES 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Allen, Smith, Van Haaster, Walsh,
Perry
NOES 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
City of Temecula
AYES
4 COUNCILMEMBERS
Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Muftoz
NOES
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: .None
ABSENT I
COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
Provide Feedback and Prioritization of the Joint Committee Goals
Ben Minamide, Public Works Director/City Engineer for the City of Murrieta gave a brief
report outlining the request from the joint committee for prioritization of the goals and
programs-to be addressed in the future.
Councilmember Jerry Allen asked that Development of a Cost Sharing Program be
added to the goals.
Councilmember Ronald Parks asked that Joint Cooperative Efforts on the Circulation
Elements of General Plans of each city be added to the list of goals. He also suggested
that this not be confused w~th any elements of the two general plans which deal with
land use designations.
City of Temecula Planning Director Gary Thornhill stated the City of Temecula has
requested that the consultants working on each of the General Plans work together
and he reported the Planning staffs have been communicating on the directions of the
General Plans.
2/Minutes/011493 -3- 01/22/93
Ciw C~undl Minute Januaw 14:1893
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Roberrs to direct
the Joint Committee to pursue the following list of joint committee goals:.
as
fe
g.
h.
i.
Interchange Study
Truck Traffic
Western Corridor
Alternative Modes of Transportation
Development of Cost Sharing Programs and .Joint Applications for State/Federal
Transportation Funds
TDM/TSM Programs
General Plan Consultant Coordination on Circulation Elements
Road to the Sea
Joint input to County on Development Proposal in unincorporated areas that
affect each City,
Light Rail
3. Establish Mutual Agreements on Annexation
Councilmember Jerry Allen requested that the two City Councils agree not to accept
annexation requests with respect to areas in the other city's sphere of influence.
Councilmember Birdsell expressed the need to have additional information on. this
subject prior to making any decisions which might go beyond anything that has not
been designated by LAFCO.
It was moved by Councilmember Walsh, seconded by Councilmember Parks to direct
staff to meet on this issue and make a recommendation to the respective City Councils
at the next scheduled joint meeting.
COUNCILMEMItFR COMMENTS
Councilmember Walsh stated he is gratified to see the two cities working in concert
on common problems.
Councilmember Allen thanked the members of both City Councils for their excellent
spirit of cooperation.
Councilmember Parks stated that he would like to see a solution to flooding of the
Murrieta Creek as another area of mutual cooperation.
Mayor Mu~oz advised that URGE will be coming to both City Councils to request
support ~for alternative means of flood control within the Creek.
STAFF COMMI:NTS
Temecula City Manager David Dixon stated he is very proud of the professionalism and
integrity displayed by the staff members of both Cities.
2/Minute8/O 11493 -4- 01122/93
City Counoil Minute Jenuerv 14, 1993
ADJOURNM;NT
It was moved by Mayor Muf~oz, seconded by Councilmember Allen to adjourn this
meeting to a joint meeting of the Murrieta and Temecula City Councils to be held not
later than 90 days. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Jeff
Stone absent.
ATTEST:
J. Sal Mufioz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
21Minutee/O 11493 -5- 01122/93
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD JANUARY 19, 1993
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 6:37 PM in the
Temecula City Hall, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Mayor J. Sal Mu~oz
presiding.
PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs,
Stone, Muf~oz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and City Clerk
June S. Greek.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the pledge of allegiance by Councilmember Parks.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
City Manager Dixon announced two emergency resolutions regarding the recent flooding
needed to be added to the agenda due to subsequent need.
City Attorney Field stated the Brown Act provides that situations affecting public health and
safety, which arise after the preparation of the agenda, may be added to a Council Meeting.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to add two
emergency resolutions to the agenda. The motion was unanimously carried.
1. . Emerqencv Resolutions
City Manager Dixon stated that the City's Ordinance No. 91-34, regarding disaster
relief, allows the City Manager to proclaim a local emergency when the City Council
is not in session, however it requires that within seven (7) days of the proclamation,
the City Council must confirm this action.
He explained that the second resolution allows for appropriation of funds in the amount
of $250,000 to cover expenses incurred during the recovery process.
Minutes\l \ 19\93 - 1 - 01122/93
City Council Minutes January 19. 1993
1.b
Mayor Mufioz asked for an update on current situations. Director of Public Works, Tim
Serlet, Community Services Director Shawn Nelson, Police Chief Rick Sayre and
Riverside County Fire Battalion Chief Mark Brodowski; Chief Building Official Tony
Elmo, Finance Officer Mary Jane Henry end City Manager David Dixon gave a brief
report on current conditions.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts requested that Councilmembers be provided with a copy of
the City's Disaster Plan.
Mayor Mufioz asked that the City look into problems associated with raw sewage spills
during current flooding. City Manager Dixon asked Chief Building Official Tony Elmo
to contact the Riverside County Health Department regarding this issue.
Margaret Benzango, 41498 Avenida Barca, thanked City Staff and the City Council for
their effective handling of a difficult situation.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to adopt
emergency resolutions as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
CONFIRMING THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY
RESOLUTION NO. 93-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 BUDGET TO ACCOMPLISH BUDGET
TRANSFERS AND APPROPRIATIONS FOR DISASTER RECOVERY
The motion was unanimously carried.
Develooment Imoact/Development Processin{3 Fees
Finance Officer. Mary Jane Henry presented the staff report. She first discussed
Development Processing Fees and introduced City Consultant John McTighe to further
explain these type of fees.
Mayor Mur~oz stated he feels the City should be recovering as close to 100% cost
level as possible.
Finance Officer Mary Jane Henry reported that currently approximately 92% of fees
will be recovered; however as transition from contract to in-house employees, who are
more cost effective occurs, this percentage should increase.
Minutec%1%19%93 -2- 01122/93
City Counoil Minutes January 1 tl, 1993
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
approve staff recommendation regarding development fees.
The motion was unanimously carried.
Finance Officer Henry presented a staff report regarding Development Impact Fees and
presented the City Council with different scenarios from which to choose.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
prepare the Development Impact Fee Reports based on Scenario Number 3 as outlined
in Exhibit 9.
Mayor Mu~oz argued against the motion stating he feels Scenario Number Two is a
more equal spread between commercial and residential.
A call for the question was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by
Councilmember Parks.
The motion failed by the following vote:
AYES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks
NOES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
'Roberts, Stone, Mu~oz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
RECESS
Mayor Mu~oz declared a recess at 8:36 PM to change the tape. The meeting was reconvened
at 8:50 PM.
After further'discussion the motion on the floor was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs, Stone
NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Personnel Policy Revisions
Luci Romero, Senior Management Analyst, presented the staff report.
Minutes~l \19\93 -3- 01/22/S3
Ciw Council Minutee Jenuerv 19. 1993
Mayor Muf~oz expressed concern regarding temporary upgredes, since no cap is placed
on how much higher the salary rate may be established.
City Manager Dixon suggested that the policy be adjusted to read: "Temporary
Upgrade Assignment shall be adjusted by 5.0% or to the minimum rate .of the
temporary classification, whichever is greater," deleting the sentence giving the City
Manager discretion to establish a higher rate.
Mayor Pro Tem Robert~ asked if the suggested Bereavement Leave is in addition to the
established Comprehensive Annual Leave time.
Senior Management Analyst Luci Romero answered that three additional days are
recommended, only for use as bereavement leave.
Councilmember Birdsall expressed concern regarding the 12-month limit on return from
military leave.
City Manager Dixon suggested that this be amended to allow military leave in 'excess
of 12 months to be reviewed, under extenuating circumstances, by the City Council.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Stone to
approve the Revised Personnel Policy Revisions with a change in the Military Leave
Policy to allow leave in excess of 12 months to be reviewed, under extenuating
circumstances, by the City Council; and modify the policy dealing with Temporary
upgrades by deleting the last sentence in Section II.
The motion was unanimously carried.
Revision to Schedule of Authorized Positions
Senior Management Analyst Luci Romero presented the staff report.
Mayor Muftoz Objected to the p~oposal, stating he was in favor of the original proposal ·
from staff dated November 18, 1992 and feels comfortable with adjusting only the
ranges from Office Assistant through Executive Secretary.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Stone to
extend the meeting until 10:30 PM.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Parks, Roberts, Stone, Muftoz
NOES: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Minutes~l ~19%93 -4- 01122/93
City Cour~il Minutes Jenuerv 19. 1993
Mayor .Pro Tem Roberts expressed concern regarding the Traffic Engineer position
which the City has been unable to recruit due to the salary range.
It was moved by Mayor Mu~oz, seconded by Councilmember Stone to accept Option
Number One of the proposal dated November 18, 1992 which states no adjustment
to salary variances under 5%, and salary variances over 15% will only receive a 10%
adjustment. He moved adding the special category of Traffic Engineer and applying
this to those classifications from Office Assistant down to Executive Secretary at this
time.
Councilmember Parks objected, stating he feels this will not fix the existing problems'
and he is in favor of a longer lasting solution.
City Manager Dixon suggested that staff recommendation be approved adopting the
entire Schedule of positions, with salary adjustments being made in accordance with
Option 1 of the previous memorandum, which provides for no more than a 10%
adjustment. He stated this will give a complete set of ranges for budgeting purposes
and he will commit that the City Manager will not bring any salary revisions back
before the Council for 18 months. He also requested that the title of Budget
Administrator be changed to Financial Services Administrator which is more in line with
the duties of the position.
Mayor Mu~oz amended his motion, Mayor Pro Tem Roberts amended his second and
City Clerk June Greek restated the motion as follows:
It was moved by Mayor Mu~oz, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs to approve staff
recommendation adopting the resolution revising the Schedule of Authorized Positions,
with the following changes in Exhibit A: the title of Budget Administrator is changed
to Financial Services Administrator. Salary adjustments are to be made in accordance
with Option I of the staff memorandum dated November 18, 1992 which directs staff
to prepare a revision to the Schedule of Authorized Positions to reflect the salary range
adjustments as proposed, with some exceptions: 1) No adjustment to salary
variances under 5%; and 2) Salary variances over 15% will only receive · .10%
adjustment. This direction was given with the exception of the Traffic Engineer
position which was approved for a 33% adjustment. Stipulated that no further salary
adjustments will be presented to the City Council by the City Manager for approval for
a period of not less than 18 months.
3.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED.POSITIONS
Minutes~l \19\93 -5- 01122/93
CiW Council Minutes 3artuser 19. 1993
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4
NOES: 1
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Roberts, Stone, Mufioz
Parks
None
RECESS
Mayor Mufioz called a brief recess at 10:35 PM, The meeting was reconvened at 10:43 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to extend the
meeting to 11:00 PM.
Mayor
5.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: I COUNCILMEMBERS:
Parks, Roberts, Stone, Mufioz
Birdsall
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Mur~oz announced that Item No. 5 would be taken out of order.
Selection of Council Committee Assignments
City Clerk June Greek presented the staff report.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve
the following Council Committee Assignments:
Commission Liaison (One Member)
Parks and Recreation Commission:
Planning Commission:
Public/Traffic Safety Commission:
Committee Assionments One or two members)
Administration Committee:
Airport Committee:
City Promotion/Economic Development Committee:
Community Services Funding Review Committee:
Cultural Preservation Committee:
Jeff Stone
Ronald J. Parks
Ron Roberrs
Ron Parks
Jeff Stone
Jeff Stone, Ron Roberts
Pet Birdsell, Jeff Stone.
Jeff Stone
Minutes~1%19~93 -6- 01122/)3
City Council Minutes January 1 g, 1993
Committee Assionmerrts (cont.)
Design Standards Committee:
Finance Committee:
General Plan Committee:
Integrated Waste Management Committee:
K-RAT, JPA:
Legislative Committee:
Old Town Steering Committee:
Public Works/Facilities Committee:
RCTC:
RDA Committee:
Regional Transit Authority Representative:
Sister City Committee:
Sphere of Influence Committee:
WRCOG Representative
Murrietarremecula Transportation/Traffic Comm.
The motion was unanimously carried.
Ron Parks
Sal Mu~oz/Pat Birdsall
Ron Parks/Jeff Stone
Ron Roberts
Sal Mu~oz/Ron Parks (air.)
Ron Roberts
Jeff StoneIRon Parks
Ron Roberts, Ron Parks
Ron Parks
Sal Mufioz, Ron Parks
Sol Muf~oz
'Pat Birdsall, Ron Roberrs
Jeff Stone
Sal Mu~oz, Ron Parks (air.)
Ron Roberts
4:
Community Services Funding Criteria
Finance Officer Mary Jane Henry presented the staff report.
Margaret Benzango, 41498 Avenida Barca, spoke in favor of the City Council giving
favorable consideration of a grant for Grad Night.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to
approve staff recommendations as follows:
4.1 Review the philosophy and funding criteria for the Community Services
Funding Program;
4.2 Designated Councilmember Birdsall and Councilmember Stone to review
the applications received from organizations requesting funds.
The motion was unanimously carried.
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
None given.
Minutes%l \19\93 -7- 01/22/93
Ciw CouN}il Minute Jenuerv 19. 1993
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
None given.
CITY COUNCIL RI:PORTS
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Parks,' seconded by Councilmember Stone to adjourn at
11: 15 PM to a meeting on January 26, 1992, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816
Pujol Street, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried.
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
J. Sal Mu~ioz, Mayor
Minutes%1%19%93 -8- 01122/93
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD JANUARY 26, 1993
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:38 PM in the
Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. Mayor J. Sal Mur~oz
presiding.
PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs,
Stone, Muftoz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field, end City Clerk
June S. Greek.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
I was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to recess to an
executive session pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9(a), (b) and (c) regarding
potential litigation and 54957.6(a) regarding labor negotiations. The motion was unanimously
carried.
The meeting was reconvened at 7:10 'PM.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor Bill Rench, Calvary Baptist.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the pledge of allegiance by Councilmember Roberts.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
James Marpie, 19210 St. Gallen Way, Murrieta, addressed the City Council regarding
unprotected construction sites contributing to the silt in the Creek and the subsequent
flooding.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Parks asked that Item No. 4 be removed from the consent calendar for
questions.
Minutes\ 1 \26~93 - 1 - 02/02/93
CiW Counoil Minute January 26~ 1993
Mayor Mufioz stated that staff recommended Item No. 5 be continued to the meeting of
February 9, 1993.
5. Revised Vestino Final Tract MaD No. ~;~103
It was moved .by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Counciimember Robarts to approve
Consent Calendar Items 1-3, and 6-8. The motion was unanimously carried.
1. Standard Ordinance Adoorion Procedure
1.1
Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the aganda.
Resolution AoorovinQ List of Demands
2.'1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-06
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF T~=MECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
City Treasurer's Report as of December 31.1992
3.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's report as of December 31, 1992.
Acceotance of Road Easements and Temoorarv Construction Easements on Ynez Road
Between Rancho California Road and Palm Plaza for Road Widening Imorovements
within CFD 88-12
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ACCEPTING OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC ROAD AND DRAINAGE
PURPOSES INCLUDING PUBLIC UTILITY AND PUBLIC SERVICES PURPOSES
AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS ON YNEZ ROAD 'BETWEEN
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND PALM PLAZA
Minutes~.l \26%93 -2- 02/02/93
CiW Counoil Minute January 26. 1993
Resolution Reconfirmina Existence of a Local Emergency
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-08
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
RECONFIRMING THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY
OF TEMECULA
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE
8. Read bv title only and adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-01
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
RELATING TO MOBILE SOURCE AIR POLLUTION REDUCTION THROUGH
REDUCING EMPLOYMENT-RELATED MOTOR VEHICLE TRIPS AND
EMPLOYMENT-RELATED MOTOR VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED
Award of Professional Services Contract to The Elli0tt Grouo to Provide Landscaoe
Plan Review Services and Update City Standards as they Relate to Landscape Plan
Review
Councilmember Parks asked that the Council give direction to staff that local
businesses be given special consideration, by developing a point system to be used
during the rating process.
City Manager Dixon stated staff can develop a weighted system based on numerical
scoring for professional services .and suggested that one or two members of the
Council be invited to sit on the screening board when a professional services contract
is being considered. He stated staff could have this back before the Council in 30
days.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to
approve staff recommendation, with additional direction to staff to develop a policy to
give weighted consideration to local firms during the City's selection procedures for
professional services.
The motion was unanimously carried.
Minutes~ 1 ~26~93 -3- 02/02/93
Council Minutes Jenuerv 26. 1993
PUBLIC HEARINGS
9. Aooeal No. 28 for Plot Ran No. 245, Amendment No. 1, Adems Advertising
10.
- Appeal No, '29 for Plot Plan No..~46. Amendment No. 1, Adams Advertisinq
Gary Thornhill presented the staff report on Items 9 end 10 concurrently.
Mayor Mur~oz opened the public hearing for Items 9 and 10 at 7:35 PM.
Michelle Adame, Adams Advertising, 19081 'Rocky Road, Santa Ana, the applicant
asked the City Council to consider appealing the Planning Commission's
recommendation of denial based on three major issues: First, this was a permitted use
with Riverside County; second, businesses and developers have suffered a hardship
by not being able to adequately advertize and third; Adams Advertising has suffered
an economic hardship due to the application process time of three years. She also
stated that the Planning Commission has recently approved a proposed zone change
of this property to Neighborhood Commercial.
BOb Adams, Adams Advertising, applicant, 19081 Rocky Road, Santa Ana, addressed
the City Council regarding the need for outdoor advertising in the City of Temecula and
stated that signs are limited from the junction of Highways 215 and 15 and 79 South,
due to the designation of a scenic corridor, and no additional signs are allowed in that
area.
Evelyn Harker, 31130-95 S. General Kearny Road, spoke in support of Adams
Advertising appeal of the Planning Commission denial and spoke specifically to the
need for advertising local community events.
Pat Desjardins, 34350 Olive Grove Road, Wildomar, 'spoke in favor of outdoor
advertising being allowed in the City of Temecula.
Greg Treadwell, 27300 B. Jefferson, spoke in favor of the appeal by Adams
Advertising.
Councilmember. Stone asked how many signs Adams Advertising currently owns in the
City of Temecula and what is the average lease per month. Mr. Adams answered
there are eight double-sided signs at approximately ~1,000 per month.
Councilmember Parks asked if these signs are approved, would the applicant be willing
to donate sign space for promotion of City Events. Mr. Adams answered that his
company has in the past and would continue to donate space to support local events.
Mayor Mufioz closed the public hearing at 8:13 PM.
Minutes~1%26%93 -4- 02/02/93
City Council Minutes Jenuefv 26. 1993
Councilmember Parks asked whether billboards will be allowed anywhere in the City
with the current general plan designations. Director of Planning Gary Thornhill
answered the General Plan does not specifically address billboards but rather
community design aspects.
City Attorney Field explained the City is currently operating under a permanent
ordinance which prohibits billboards in the City. Since the Council wanted to look at
this issue again, a "sunset clause" was built into the ordinance which causes it to
expire this April, at which time the Council will make the decision whether or not to
continue prohibition of billboards in the City.
Councilmember Parks stated he objects to a total prohibition of billboards and believes
this type of advertising is necessary, in a limited amount, to provide businesses the
opportunity to advertise as well as promote local events.
Councilmember Stone stated he does not feel this appeal has presented a hardship
issue and that he objects to billboards due to safety issues and the possibility of
increased graffiti activity.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
9.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-09
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECUL~A DENYING
APPEAL NO. 28, UPHOLDING PLANNING COMMISSION'$ DECISION TO DENY
PLOT PLAN NO. 245, AMENDMENT NO. 1, TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION
OF ONE (1) V-TYPE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING DISPLAY LOCATED ON THE
EAST SIDE OF WINCHESTER ROAD APPROXIMATELY 1,200 FEET NORTH OF
THE INTERSECTION OF WINCHESTER AND NICOLAS ROADS, AND KNOWN
AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 911-150-005
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Roberrs, Stone, Mufioz
NOES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Minutes~l \26%93
-5-
02~2J3
CiTy Council Minutes Jenuev 26. 1993
Councilmember Stone amended his motion, Mayor Pro Tern Roberrs amended the'
second to include Item No. 10 as follows:
10.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-10
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DENYING APPEAL NO. 29, UPHOLDING PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION
TO DENY PLOT PLAN NO. 246, AMENDMENT NO. 1, TO ALLOW THE
CONSTRUCTION OF ONE (1) V-TYPE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING DISPLAY.
LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF WINCHESTER ROAD APPROXIMATELY
1,850 FEET NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF WINCHESTER AND NICOLAS
ROADS, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 911-150-005
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Roberts, Stone, Mufioz
NOES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
RECESS
Mayor Mu~oz declared a recess at 8i31 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 8:50 PM
following the previously scheduled Community Services and Redevelopment Agency Meeting.
Following a request from Councilmember Parks, Mayor Muftoz reordered the agenda to hear ·
Item No. 18 out of order.
18. Discussion of Bovs and Girls Club Grant Reouest
City Manager Dixon presented the staff report.
Alan Winkelstein, President of Boys and Girls Club, 43055 Corte Calanda, addressed
the City Council requesting the City grant a loan in the amount of $350,000 to be
repaid in services to the City which would commence one' year after the loan is
granted. He introduced the Board of Directors and explained the. need in this
community for this type of service.
Margie Gonzalez, 28805 Pujol Street, spoke in favor of the Boys and Girls proposal,
asking that a safe place be provided for children of working parents.
Ramon Cruz, 30394 Bogart Place, spoke in favor of the Boys and Girls club proposal.
Minutee%1%26~93 -6- 02/02/93
City Council Minutes January 26. 1993
Councilmember Stone expressed concern about allocating the entire $350,000 amount
until architectural drawings are complete and an assessment of community
involvement is made.
Councilmember Parks stated consultants are willing to donate their time if they are
assured the project will be completed. He stated that $87,000 of the costs involved
are for development fees.
RECESS
Mayor Mur~oz called a brief recess at 9:25 PM to change the tape. The meeting was
reconvened at 9:26 PM.
Mayor Mu~oz asked that this matter be continued for two weeks to allow for further
study of the issue.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to
allocated $20,000 so that solicitation of bids can take place prior to the beginning of
the facility.
Finance Officer Mary Jane McLarney stated the City could manage this project fiscally
with a line item budget, and apply City methods of budgetary controls.
Larry Markam, 41750 Winchester Road, stated that grading plans have been submitted
and consultants have donated their time and are only looking for reimbursement of out
of pocket expenses.
Councilmember Parks suggested allocating $50,000 instead of $20,000 to allow those
who have donated time and have incurred out-of-pocket expenses to be paid and to
allocate sufficient funds to get the project moving.
.Councilmember Stone amended his motion, Mayor Pro Tem Roberts amended his
second to allocate the sum of $20,000 to be disbursed by the City for architectural
plans and drawings that will allow the solicitation of bids to take place prior to
beginning construction of the facility. Council also directed that staff prepare a draft
agreement in the form of a Community Grant Contract, including a requirement for a
scope of work and a clearly defined process for budget control of the construction
funds.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Roberts, Stone, Mur~oz
NOES: I
COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Minutes\l \26%93 -7- 02/02/93
Council MinuTe& ,,lanuarv 26. 1993
City Manager Dixon stated that a status report will be brought back to the City Council
in two weeks, the City Attorney will be instructed to prepare the necessary
agreements and the Finance Officer to establish needed accounts.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to continue
Items 13, 15, 16, 17, 19 and 20 to the meeting of February 2, 1993.
13. Anti-Graffiti Removal
15. City Road PrOjects Status Reoort
16. Non-Profit Oraa nization Exemption of Fees for Outdoor Events
17. Amendment to Employment Aoreement with the City Manaoer
19. Official Name of the Parks and Recreation Commission
20.. Purchase of Law Books
The motion was unanimously carried.
'It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor. Pro Tem Roberts to extend the
meeting until 10:30 PM. The motion was unanimously carried.
RECESS
Mayor Mu~oz declared a recess at 9:54 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 11:05 PM.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
11.
28613 Pu)ol Street-Assessment of Nuisance Abatement Costs
City Attorney Field presented the staff report.
Councilmember Parks asked if the property owner, Mr. Henning, has been contacted.
Chief Building Official Tony Elmo stated all attempts to contact Mr. Henning have
failed.
Mayor Muf~oz opened the public hearing at 10:10 PM.
Hearing no requests to speak, Mayor Mur~oz closed the public hearing at 10:10 PM.
Minutes% 1%26%93 -8- 02/02/93
City Council Minutes January 26, 1993
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmemi~er Stone to.
approve staff recommendation as follows:
11.1
Approve the Notice of Nuisance Abatement Assessment Lien as a
special assessment against the real property located at 28613 Pujol
Street and the vacant parcel across therefrom.
The motion was unanimously carried.
12. Use of Tax Increment Funds for Senior Center
Finance Officer Mary Jane Henry presented the staff report.
Mayor Mur~oz opened the public hearing at 10:12 PM. Hearing no requests to speak,
Mayor Mur~oz closed the public hearing at 10:12 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
12.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-11-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING THE EXPENDITURE OF TAX INCREMENT FUNDS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SENIOR CITIZEN
CENTER IN A REDEVELOPMENT AREA
The motion was unanimously carried.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
14.
Award of Contract for the Construction of Ynez Road Widening from Rancho California
Road to Palm Plaza (Project No. 92-05)
Director of Public Works Tim Serlet introduced Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer, to
present the staff report.
Councilmember Parks stated he would feel more comfortable with a contingency
amount which can be approved by the City Manager for this project of 10% of the
contract amount instead of 15%.
Minutes\ 1 \26\93 -9- 02/02/93
City Council Minutes Jenuerv 26, 1993
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve
staff recommendation with the modification in recommendation 14.2 changing the
contingency amount the City Manager is authorized to approve from 15% of the
contract amount to 10%.
14.1
Award · contract for the construction of Ynez road Widening from
Rancho California Road to Palm Plaza, Project No. PW 92-05, to Vance
Corporation of Rialto, California for $2,612,811.29 and authorize the
Mayor to execute the contract;
14.2
Authorize the City Manager to approve change order not to exceed the
contingency amount of 10% of the contract amount.
The motion was unanimously carried.
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
City Manager Dixon reported staff and the City Council did an excellent job regarding the
emergency situation over the last week and the emergency has not been terminated at this
time to enable the City to obtain necessary emergency permits to have the flood channel
cleared. He stated the City has been coordinating with the Corps of Engineers, Riverside
County Flood District, the EPA, Fish and Game and Fish and Wildlife. Mr. Dixon reported he
hopes to have a permit by the end of.the week.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
City Attorney Field announced that URGE will sponsor a presentation by Professor Phil Bedient
of Rice University on February 8, 1993 at 7:00 at the Temecula Library~ He stated the City
Councils of Temecula and Murrieta have been invited, however no business will be conducted.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Parks requested that an ad hoc committee be set up to oversee the Ynez
Corridor - CFD 88-12 ,Project, and asked this be placed on a future agenda.
Mayor Mu~oz stated he understands the first meeting regarding the General Plan has been set
for February 16, 1993, and asked for Council consensus. Council consensus was given for
this date and City Clerk June Greek stated she would arrange a facility larger than City Hall
for this meeting.
Minutes% 1%26%93 - 1 O- 02/02/93
City Council Minutes January 26. 1993
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs, seconded by Councilmember Stone to adjourn at
10:30 PM to the meeting of February 2, 1993, 6:00 PM, Temecula City Hall, 43174 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried.
J. Sal Mur~oz, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Minutes\ 1 ~26%93 - 11 - 02/02/93
ITEM
NO.
3
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF'
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET
FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been
audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of
$753,982.39
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVEr} AND ADOPTEl), this 9th day of February, 1993.
ATTEST:
J. Sai-Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
"' Reso 296 -1-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 93- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 9th day of February, 1993 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 0
COUNCILMF~MBERS: None
NOES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Redo 296 -2-
ul/22/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
01/29/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
02/09/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
01/26/93 PAYROLL:
CITY OF TEMECULA
UST OF DEMANDS
$16,944.65
$258,5~0.65
S381,078.53
ii)7,368.56
TOTAL IJST OF DEMANDS FOR O~jOej93 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001 . GENERAL 1~47,8~.7S
100 GAS TAX FUND 184,876.88
140 COMMUNITY DEV. BLOCK GRANT $1,068.30
190 TCSD 133,805.88
191 TCSD ZONE A tl ,570.87
192 TCSD ZONE B 8196.44
193 'TCSD ZONE C 125,658.21
210 ' TCSD ZONE D $257,832.06
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP $13,584.57
300 INSURANCE FUND 13,480.98
310 VEHICLE FUN D 1371.55
~ INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS $5,412.52
COPY CENTER FUND $1,055.81
PAYROLL:
001 GENERAL (PAYROLL) $57,253.31
100 GAS TAX FUND (PAYROLL) $5,724.82
190 TCSD (PAYROLL) $15,053.99
191 TCSD ZONE A (PAYROLL} $366.74
192 TCSD ZONE B (PAYROLL) ~693.29
193 TCSD ZONE C (PAYROLL) $1,427.13
300 INSURANCE FUND $568.49
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PAYROLL) $1,001.09
330 COPY CENTER FUND (PAYROLL) $1,279.70
~856,813.83
TOTAL BY FUND:
PREPARED BY KARMA MCINTYRE
I, :~N~A'~R , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
~"~VE DIXON, CITY
VI:IJCHRE2
o11221rI5
10:09
CITY Of TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER[COS
PAGE 6
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 CCN4UNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSO ZONE A
192 TCSD ZONE B
193 TCSi) ZONE C
210 CAPITAL [HPROVEI4ENT PROJ FUND
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 ]NFONHATION SYSTEMS
330 COPY CENTER FUND
TOTAL
ANOUNT
11,120.22
960.83
2,056.65
-661.61
36.37
966.73
928.72
26.99
27.98
186.75
16,9/,4.65
VOUCHRE2
01/22/93 10:09
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUHBER DATE NUMBER
13886 01/22/93
13886 01172,193
13887 01/22/93
13887 01/22/93
13887 01/22/93
13888 01122193 000102
13889 01/22/93 000107
13890 01/22/93 000116
13890 01/22/93 000116
13890 01122193 000116
13890 01/22/93 000116
13890 01/22/93 000116
13890 01/22/93 000116
13890 01/22/93 ·000116
13890 01/22/93 000116
13891 01/22/93 000140
13891 01/22/93 000140
1:~ 01/22/93 000140
13L o1/22/93 ooo14o
13891 01/22/93 000140
13891 01/22/93 000140
13892 01/22/93 000152
VENDOR
MANE
DIX DEVELOPMENT
D]X DEVELOPHINT
KARCHER ENTERPRISES
KARCHER ENTERPRISES
KARCHER ENTERPRISES
AJqERZrJkN FENCE COffin, AMY
ALHAMBRA GROUP
AVP VISION PLAN
AVP VISION PLAN
AVP VISION PLAN
AVP VISION PLAN
AVP VISION PLAN
AVP VISION PLAN
AVP VISION PLAN
AVP VISION PLAN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACC[DEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACC]DEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACC]DEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
CALIFORNIA PARK & RECRE
13893 01/22/93 000172 GASB
13894 01/22/93 00017~ GFOA
13895 01/22/93 000177
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
13896 01/22/93 000228 NOBIL
13896 01/22/93 000228 NOBIL
13896 01/22/93 000228 MOBIL
13896 01/22/93 000228 MOBIL
13896 01/22/93 000228 MOBIL
13897 01/22/93 000249 PETTY CASH
13897 01/22/93 000249 PETTY CASH
13897 01/22/93 000249 PETTY CASH
13897 01/22/93 000249 PETTY CASH
13897 01/22/93 000249 PETTY CASH
13897 01/22/93 000249 PETTY CASH
13897 01/22/93 000249 PETTY CASH
13897 01/22/93 000249 PETTY CASH
13897 01/22/93 000249 PETTY CASH
13897--01/22/93' 000249 PETTY CASH
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
'DESCRIPTION
REFUND OF RECEIPT 52
REFUND OF RECEIPT 52
REFUND OF RECEIPT RO000
REFUND OF RECEIPT RO000
REFUND OF RECEIPT RO000
EXTRA PANELS
JC)8 92-037 LANDSCAPE AR
INSURANCE PREMIUM FOR J
INSURANCE PREMIUM FOR J
INSURANCE PREMIUM FOR J
INSURANCE PRENZUH FOR J
INSURANCE PREN[LI4 FOR J
INSURANCE PREN]UH FOR J
INSURANCE PREMIUM FOR J
INSURANCE PREMILIN FOR J
INSURANCE PRENION FOR J
INSURANCE PREMIUM FOR J
INSURANCE PREMIUM FOR J
INSURANCE PREMIUM FOR J
INSURANCE PREMIUM FOR J
INSURANCE PREMIUM FOR J
FUNDING YOUR AGENCY I.lOe
"POPULAR REPORTING" BOO
FEE REQUIRED FOR CAFR S
ENVELOPE, CLASP 9X12, B
883 930 379 2 CREDIT CA
883 930 379 2 CREDIT CA
88] 930 379 2 CREDIT CA
883 930 379 2 CREDIT CA
88] 930 379 2 CREDIT CA
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-161-4104
001-163-4388
001-161-4121
001-163-4121
001-163-4388
210-190-13~-580~
210-190-134-.580~
001-2310
100-2310
190-2310
191-2310
193-2310
300-2310
330-2310
001-1180
001-2330
100-2330
190-2330
191-2330
193-2330
· 190-2500
190-180-999-5258
001-140-999-5228
001-140-999-5250
001-140-999-5220
001-110-999-5263
001-161-999-5262
190-180-999-5263
001-162-999-5263
100-164-999-5263
001-110-999-5230
001-140-999-5260
001-110-999-5260
001-163-999-5260
001-100-999-5260
001-161-999-5228.
001-161-999-5260
001-100-999-5220
001-161-999-5228
001-163-999-5220
ITEM
AMOUNT
268.00
21.00
317.00
50.00
25.00
177.00
751.72
397.76
87.95
97.15
7.09
8.66
3.94
15.75
24.95
121.00
19.50
50.75
11.4,8
14.02
87.50
55.00
20.00
60.00
28.02
138.20
16.37
111.42
112.77
455.21
3.75
10.00
20.56
45.OO
18.00
9.58
27.00
2.69
15.22
12.35
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
289. O0
392. O0
177.00
751
643.25
304.25
55.00
20.00
60.00
28.02
833.97
164.13
VOUCHRE2
01/22/ft~
10:09
CiTY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERZOOS
PACE 3
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
13898
13900
13900
13901
13901
13901
1390Z
13903
1'3903
· 13903
13903
13903
13903
13903
13903
13903
13903
13903
13903
13903
139e3
13904
1390~
13904,
13904,
139()~
13905
13905
13906
13907
13907
13908
13909
13909
13909
13909
13909
13909
13909
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE RI. llER lINE
01/22/~
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/f3
01/22/~3
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
0!/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
000257 ItIJ4TEK
000262 RANCHO i,&TER
000307 TEMECULA TROPHY
000307 TEHECULA TROPHY
000308 TENECULA TiE AS~IAT
000308 TENECtJLA TiE AS$O CIAT
000308 TEMECULA TME ASSOCIAT
000322 UNIGLOeE BUTTERFIELD TR
000376 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
00037~ SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
000376 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
000376 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
000376 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
000376 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
00037~ SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
000376 SOUTHERN CAL[F EDISON
000376 SOUTHERN CALZF EDISON
000376 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
000376 SOUTHERN CAL]F EDISON
000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
000374 SOUTHERN CAL[F EDISON
000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON '
000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
000375 SOUTHERN CAL]F TELEPNON
000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON
000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERZF
000418
000423
000423
000426
0004,31
000~31
000431
000431
000431
000431
000~31
RIVERSIDE,COUNTY CLERK
H & H 'CRAFT & FLORAL SU
H & H CRAFT. & FLORAL SU
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
NATZOI/AL DENTAL HEALTH,
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH,
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH,
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH,
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTN,
NATIOIIAL DENTAL HEALTH,
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH,
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TIME & MATERIALS 12/23/
liATER 11/17-12/15/92
AVNK)S PLAOUE$ AND TROP
TAX
SET UP AND CLEANING FOR
FLOOR CARE FOR CITY COlJ
LOCKER RENTAL AT TOll
LAKE TAHOE AIRLINE TICK
12/2-01/08
12/03-01/05
12/03-01/05
12/04-01/06
12/04-01/06
12/04-01/06
12/04-01/06
12/04-01/06
12/04-01/07
56/77550136020002
66T/58650560100004
66775848059010005
10/20-11/18
10/20-11/18
909-202-4752 DECEMBER C
909-202-4759 DECEleiER C
909-202-6764-DEC CHARGE
909-202-6765 DECBeER C
909-202-6767 DECEMBER C
TEMEUCLA BIKE PATROL FO
PARKING LOT PATROL-PALM
FILING FEE/MEG DECLA FO
RECREATION SUPPLIES
RECREATION SUPPLIES
CLEANERS & NIFTY NABBER
INSURANCE PREMZON FOR J
INSURANCE PREMIUM FOR J
INSURANCE PREMIUM FOR J
INSURANCE PREMIUM FON J
[NSUIUkNCE PREMIUM FOR J
INStJRANCE PREIqIUM FOR J
INStJRANCE PREMIUM FOR J
ACCOUNT
liNgER
100-1~,-~-5602
lf3-180-~9-5260
190-183-939-5300
190 - 183 - 939-5300
001 - 100-~-523~
001-100-~-523~
1~0-180-~-5238
001-100-~9-5258
191-180-999-5500
193-180-~9~-5260
193-180-999-5240
193-180-f99-5260
193-180-~-5260
193-180-~-5260
193-180-~9-5240
lf3-180-~-5240
193-180'~999-5260
191-180-999-5500
001-199-999-5240
001-199-999-5240
191-180-999-5500
191-180-999-5500
190-180-999-5208
001-162-999-5208
001-163-~-5208
001-163-~99-5208
001-161-~5208
001-170-999-5326
001-170-~-5326
001-163-~-5224
190:180-~-5300
190-180-~-5300
1~0-180-999-521Z
001 -Z3~O
100-Z.%0
i90-2340
191-2360
192-23/,0
193-23,~0
300-2340
ITEM
92.07
611.47
488.13
37.83
~0.00
15.00
15.00
330.00
189.63
13.80
13.20
13.20
13.20
17.56
13.20
13.20
13
165.23
558.64
881.06
137.38
13Z.65
67.14
40.03
49.07
40.66
36.28
356.10
284.88
25.00
124.36
26.37
33.90
576.87
78.75
126.00
7.0~
15
8.66
7.88
CHE~
AMOUNT
92.07
611.47
525.~6
120.00
330.00
2,176.15
2~2.~
640.~8
25.00
1/,8
33.9O
VOUCHREZ
01/22/9]
10:09
CITY OF TBIECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOIl ALL PERICOS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUNBER
13909
13909
13909
13910
13911
13912
13912
13912
13912
13912
13912
13913
13913
13914
13915
13915
13
13916
13916
13916
13916
13916
13916
13916
13916
-13916
13916
13916
13916
13916
13916
13916
13916
13916
13916
13916
13916
13916
13916
13916
13916
13916
13916
CHECK VE~ VENDO~ ITEM ACCOUNT
DATE NUIIER NANE DESCRIPTION. NUMBER
01/22/93
01/22/9~
01/22/93
01/22/9~
01/22/93
01/22/9~
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/9~
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
01/22/93
000631
000631
000631
000518
000642
0O0662
000662
0006~2
00064.2
00064.2
000t43
00O643
000731
000730
000730
000765
000765
000765
000765
000765
000765
000765
000765
000765
000765
000765
000765
000765
000765
000765
000765
000765
000765
000765
000765
000765
000765
000765
000765
000765
000765
000765
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH,
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH,
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH,
INSURANCE PREMIUM FON J
INSURANCE PRENIUN FOR J
INSURANCE PRB!IUN FOR J
SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEI~ SIERRA CONFERENCE
DEL RIO CARE ANIMAL ItOS CHEM.PAN & TRYPSIN IMMU
CITY OF TENECULA - FLEX REIN ACCT P/R 12/17-12/
CITY OF TENECULA - FLEX REIN ACCT P/R 12/17-12/
CITY OF TEHECULA - FLEX REIN ACCT PIR 12/17-12/
CITY OF TENECULA - FLEX REIN ACCT P/R 12/17-12/
CITY OF TENECULA - FLEX REIN ACCT P/R 12/17-121
CITY OF TENECULA - FLEX REIN ACCT P/R 12/17/.12/
FORTHER HARDI,/ARE
FORTHER HARDHARE
CAR-300 CAUTION ROLL
BC6B-BR BATTERY CHARGER
NATIONAL CAREER M:)RKSHO LIBRARY BOOKS/USED IN S
INTOXINETERS, INC.
INTOXIMETERS, INC.
GROUP/UqERICA
GROUP/UqERICA
GROUP AMERICA
GROUP AMERICA
GROUP AHER ] CA
GROUP AMERICA
GROUP AMER I CA
· GROUP AMERICA
'GROUP AMER I CA
GROUP AHER]CA
GROUP AI4ER ] CA
GROUP AMERICA
GROUP AMER I CA
GROUP AMERICA
GROUP AMERICA
GROUP AI~R]CA
GROUP AMERICA
GROUP AHERICA
GROUP ANER I CA
GROUP ANER[CA
GROUP AMERICA
GROUP AHERICA
GROUP ARERICA
GROUP AMERZCA
GROUP AMERICA
GROUP AMERICA
GROUP AMERICA
ONE-MAY NOUTHPIECE FOR
TAX
LIFEIAD&D PREMIUN FOR J
LIFE/AD&D PREMIIJN FOR J
LIFE/AD&D PREMIUN FOR J
LIFE/AD&D PRENION FOR J
LIFElAD&I) PREMIUM FOR J
LIFE/AD&D PREMIUM FOR J
LIFEIAD&D PREMIUM FOR J
LIFEIAD&D PREMIUM FOR J
LIFE/AD&D PRENIUM FOR J
LTD PRENIUM FOR JANUARY
LTD PRENIUM FOR JANUARY
LTD PRENIUM FOR JANUARY
LTD PRENIUM FOR JANUARY
LTD PRENIUM FOR JANUARY
LTD PRENIUM FOR JANUARY
LTD PRENIUM FOR JANUARY
LTD PRENIUM FOR JANUARY
LTD PRENIUM FOR JANUARY
STD PRENIUM FOR JANUARY
STD PRENIUM FOR JANUARY
STD PREN[UM FOR JANUARY
SI'D PRENIUM FOR JANUARY
STD PRENIUM FOR JANUARY
STD PREN]UM FOR JANUARY
STD PRENIUN FOR JANUARY
STD PRENIUM FOR JANUARY
STD PRENIUM FOR JANUARY
330-23,60
001-1180
001-150-999-5250
001 - 161-999-5258
001-1fi:)-~-5285
190-1020
19~-1020
300-1020
330-1020
100-1020
001-1020
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
001-161-999-5258
001-170-999-5242
001-170-999-5242
001-2360
100-2360
190-2360
191-2360
192-2360
193-2360
300-Z$60
320-2360
330-Z3~0
001 -~
1~-~
191 -BO
192-~
1~-~
300-~
~20-~
001-25~
1 O0 - ~ O0 '
1~-2500
191-2500
192-~00
1~-2500
300-2500
320-25~
g0-2500
[TEN
AMOUNT
31.50
31.50
15.00
108.14
366.92
172.83
1.10
100.00
25.00-
3,352.54
17.63
11.63
21.09
50.00
3.~
5~..36
78.38
123.50
4.28
9.50
14.72
4.76
9.50
19.00
808.16
125.76
176.40
5.36
7.63
19.07
7.58
15.05
15.07
181.50
28.21
60.22
1.22
1.69
1.73
3.43
3.43
CHECK
AIqOUNT
897. O0
160.00
108.16
3,968.39
29.06
21.09
53.88
2,243.65
VOUCHRE2
01/22/93 10:09
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK fiNDOlt VENDOR
HUNBER DATE NUMBER NAME
13917 01/22/93 000796 ICBO - SAN DIEGO CHAPTE
13918 01/22/93 000797 HARTLEY, BRUCE
13919 01/22/93 000798 ELDORADO HOTEL, THE
13920 01/22/93 000799
CITY OF TENECULA '
VOUCHER/CHECK RE61$TER
FOR ALL PERICl)$
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
1993NENBEREHIP\SANDIE
TUITION REIIIBURSEMENT
CA HOIIICIDE INV COlIF\NO
CALIFORNIA HOHICIDE INV CA HOMICIDE lIP/. COlIF R
TOTAL CHECKS
ACCOUNT
litJMBER
001-162-999-5226
001'150-999-5259
001-170-999-5258
001-170-999-5258
ITEM
AROUNT
25.00
600. O0
252.88
130.00
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
25.00
600.00
252.88
130.00
16,9~,4.65
VOUCHRE2
01
15:11
CiTY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHiCle REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUNO
lfO COIlUNITY SERVICES DISTRZCT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
1~ TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL [NPROVENENT PROJ FUND
300 INSlJRANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FUND
320 ]NFORNAT/ON SYSTENS
330 COPY CENTER FUND
TOTAL
ANOUNT
218,066.3~
8,3(:)6.50
1~,993.~1
162.07
1,377.62
10,279.95
371.55
3,409.70
871.06
258,590.65
VOtJCHREZ CZTY OF TENECtJLA
01/~9/93 15:11 VOUCHER/CHECK ItEG[STER
FOR ALL PERIODS
---> VOiD CHECKS
CHECK NUNBERS
COt4HENTS
013922 TO 013925 SPOILED CHECKS
PAGE 1
VOUCHRE2
01/29/93
15:11
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/*
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
13780 01/26/r~J 000379
318039 01/28/93 00028~
318039 01/28/93 000283
318039 01/28/93 000283
318039 01/28/93 000283
318039 01/28/93 000283
318o39 01/28/93 oo0283
318039 01/28/93 000283
318o39 01/28/93 0o0283
318039 01/28/93 0oo283
318039 01/28/93. o00283
318039 01/28/93 000283
318o39 01/28/93 000283
318039 01/28/93 0o0283
.318039 01/28/93 oo0283
318039 01/28/93 000283
318039 01/28/93 000283
318039 01/28/93 000283
379112 01i28/93 0004~4
379112 01/28/93 000~44
379~t~ 01/28/93 0002~4
37~ 01/28/93 0004~4
379112 01/Z8/93 000~44
379112 01/28/93 000444
379112 01/28/93 000444
379112 01/28/93 000~
379112 01/28/93 000444
379112 01/28/93 '000444
379112 01/28/93 000444
379112 01/28/93 000444
379112 01/Z8/93 00044/,
379112 01/28/93 000444
379112 01/28/93 000444
379112 01/28/93 000444
379112 01/28/93 000444
13926 01/29/93
13927 01/29/93 000100
13928 01/29/93 000107
13929 01/29/93 000112
13930 01/29/93 000120
13931 01/29/93 000127
13931 01/29/93 000127
VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
W. DEAN DAVIDSON
PAYlENT FOR EXTRA DESIG 210-199-801-5802
BANK OF AMERICA. 000283 FICA/NED 001-2070
BANK OF AMERICA 00028~ FICA/NED 100-2070
BANK OF AERICA 000283 FICA/MED 190-2070
BANK OF AHERICA 000283 FICA/NED 191-2070
BANK OF NqERICA 000283 FICA/NED 192-2070
BANK OF AMERICA 000283 FICA/NED 193-2070
BANK OF AMERICA 00028S FICA/NED 300-2070
BANK OF AMERICA 000283 F]CA/liF, D 320-2070
BANK OF AHERICA 000283 FICA/HED 330-2070
BANK OF AMERICA 000283 USIT 001-2070
BANK OF AHERICA 00028:$ US]T 100-2070
BANK OF AHERICA 000283 USIT 190-2070
BANK OF AMERICA 000283 US]T 191-2070
BANK OF AMERICA 000283 USIT 193-2070
BANK OF AHERICA 000283 USIT 300-2070
BANK OF AMERICA 000283 USIT 320-2070
BANK OF AMERICA 000283 USIT 330-2070
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 0004/e4 CAIT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000~' CAIT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 00044~ CAIT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000444 CAIT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000444 CAIT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 0004/,/, CAIT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000444 CAIT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000444 CAIT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 0004/e4 SDI
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000444
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000444 SDI
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000/~04 SD!
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 0004J04 SD]
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000~ SDI
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000444 SDI
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000/~e4 SDI
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000444
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
CITY OF NURRIETA
CITY NURRIETA/REFUND 001-163-~-5228
ALLIED BARRICADE CONPAN 3 STOP/SLO~J PADDLES 100-16~-999-5244
ALHAMBRA GROUP
dO8 # 92-036 LDSP ARCH 100-164-999-5248
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSIX: MEMBERSHIP
BICKNELL TRAVEL CENTER AIR FARE FEB, 17-19
001-161-999-5258
001-140-999-5258
CALIFORNIAN
CALIFORNIAN
CITY OF TENECULA, COle4 190-180-999-5228
TOO1506QI PUBLIC NOTICE 001-161-999-5256
10,150.00
2,405.09
362.12
524.21
15.58
20.68
51.82
20.28
37.30
40.08
10,457.41
1,693.42
1,963.43
98.59
227.05
85.26
207.19
56.24
2,659.21
366.75
421.15
28.63
48.09
19.96
42.75
7.69
1,079.8~
160.85
234.01
6.61
9.27
22.74
9.03
16.72
17.96
501.32
733.11
390.00'
121.00
74.53
· 38.72
10,150.00
18,265.75
5,151.26
501.32
41.86
733.11
390.00
121.00
113.25
VOUCHRE2
01/29/93 15=11
CiTY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERICOS
PAGE 3
VOUCHER/'
CHECK CHECK VEIOR
NUHBER DATE NUIIER
13932 01/29/93 OO0135
13932 01/29/93 000135
13933 01/29/93 000136
13933 01/29/93 000136
1393/, 01/29/93 000137
13934 01/29/93 000137
13934 01/29/93 000137
13934 01/29/93 000137
13934 01/29/93 000137
VENDOR ITEM ACCOJ_~T ITBI
NARE DESCRZPTIOR NLNBER ~ICIJNT
CENTRAL CITIES S!li SEE STREET SIGNS & HANNARE
CENTRAL CITIES SICall SER TAX
CHESHERS' CUSTOH EMBRO] FRMED CITY SEAL
CHESHERS~ CUSTOH EMBROI TAX
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
CHEVROR U.S.A. INC.
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
CHEVRON U.S.A. ZNC.
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
13935 01/29/93 000155 DAVLIN
~3936 01/29/93 000165
13937 01/29/93 000168
13938 01/29/93 000180
13938 01/29/93 000180
13938 01/29/93 000180
FEDERAL EXPRESS
CHEVRON GAS CARD FOR OC
CHEVRON GAS CARD FOR OC
CHEVRON GAS CARD FOR OC
CHEVRON GAS CARD FOR OC
CHEVRON GAS CARD FOR OC
JAN 12 1993 CITY COUNCI
REF NO 97726716/ICHA RE
TENECULA FLMR CORRAL FLOUERS TO LINDA BEAUDO
GRAY BAR ELECTRIC
GRAY BAR ELECTRIC
GRAY BAR ELECTRIC
13939 01/29/93 000184 GTE
13939 01/29/93 00018~ GTE
13939 01/29/93 00018/* GTE
13939 01/29/93 00018~ GTE
13940 01/29/93 000194
13940 01/29/93 '000194
13940 01/29/93 000194
13940 01/29/93 000194
13940 01/29/93 000194
13940 01/29/93 000194
13940 01/29/93 000194
13940 01/29/93 000194
13941 01/29/93 000195
13942 01/29/93 000199
13942 01/29/93 000199
13942 01/29/93 000199
13943 01/29/93 000213
139/,4 01/29/93 000214
13945 01/29/93 000219
13946 01/29/93 00024,6
13946 01/29/93 0002/,6
13946 01/29/93 0002~6
PC-8-1000-14PR CABLE,
FREIGHT
TAX
909-69/*-1989 DEC CHARGE
909-696-1989DEC CHARGE
909-69/*-1989 HILLDAN
909-699-2475 DEC/JAN CH
ICHA RETIREMENT
ICHA RETIREMENT
ICNA RETIREHENT
ICHA RETIREMENT
ICNA RETIREMENT
ICNA RETIREMENT
ICHA RETIREMENT
ICNA RETIREMENT
INSURANCE PREMIUH/JAN
INSURANCE PREHIUH/JAN
INSURANCE PREMIUH/JAN
INSURANCE PREMIUM/JAN
INSURANCE PREMIUM/JAN
INStJRANCE PREMIUH/JAN
INSURANCE PREMIUH/JAN
INSURANCE PREMIUM/JAN
ASCON HASLER NAILING SY RESET POSTAGE/ACCT 7411
INTERNAL REVENUE SERV[C 4TH QTR TAXES
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 4TH QTR TAXES
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 4TH QTR TAXES
LOCAL GOVERNMENT CCII~IS CONFERENCE/FEB 26-28
LUNCH & STUFF CATERING DINNER COUNCIL
HARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO FILM DEVELOPING, PURCHA
PERS BIPLOYEES' RETIREM 0002/~ PER REDE
PER$ BIPLOYEES' RETIREH 0002/*6 PER REDE
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET
100-16~-999-52/.4
100-16/*-999-5244
001-120-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
310-16~-999-5214
310-162-999-521/*
001-170-999-5262
190-180-999-5263.
001-110-999-5263
001-100-999-5250
001-150-999-5Z30
001-2170
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
001-12Z0'
320-199-999-5208
001-1300
001-163-999-5208
001-2080
100-2080
190-2080
191-2080
193-2080
300-2080
330-Z080
320-2080
330-199-999-5581
001-1~0-999-5104
190-2070
001-2070
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5260
001-163-999-5250
001-2130
100-2130
001-2390
31.88
125.00
9.69
360.32
11.23
62.66
83.15
37./,5
859.61
9.50
92.67
173.38
33.25
163.5/,
136.70
18.38
7,016.08
892.78
62.38
76.24
38.05
293.76
462.02
188.25
.25-
16.35
13.95
/*90.00
56.00 '
13.12
42.94
i71.76
10,345.39
CHECK
N~UNT
443.28
134.69
55/*.81
859.61
9.50
92.67
220.07
10,312.37
188.25
30.135
4~0.00
56.00
13.12
VOUCHRE2
01/29/9)
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NLI4BER
15:11
CHECK VENI)(I VENDOR
DATE NI,JNBER NAME
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
DESCRIPTION NIJIIBER AI40UNT
13~4& 01/29/93 0002/,6 PERS EMPLOYEES,' RETIREN 0002/,6 PER$ RET 100-23~0
13946 01/29/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES, RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 1~0-23g0
13~6 01/29/~F3 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES, RETIREIq 000246 PERS RET 191-2390
13946 01/2~/f3 000246 PERS EHPLOYEES, RETIREH 000246 PERS RET 192-23~0
13966 01/29/93. 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES, RETIREH 000246 PERS RET 193-2390
13946 01/29/~3 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET
13966 01/29/93 000246 PERS Effi>LOYEES, RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 320-23~0
13~ 01/2~/f3 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 PERS RET 330-23g0
13~46 01/29/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SIJRVIVOR OD1-23~0
13946 01/29/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REN 000246 SURVIVOR 100-23~0
13946 01/29/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR
13946 01/2g/g3 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREH 000246 SURVIVOR 191-23~0
13~46.01/29/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIHEN 000246 SURVIyOR 192-23~0
13946 01/29/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REM 000246 SURVIVOR 1~3-23~0
13946 01/Z9/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REM 000266 SURVIVOR 300-2390
13946 01/29/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETZREN 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390
13946 01/29/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390
13947
13968
1394.8
139,/.-t
13949
13949
13949
13950
13950
13950
13950
13950
13950
13950
13950
13951
13951
13951
13951
13952
13953
13953
01129193 000247
01/29/93 000248
01/29/93 000248
01/29/93 00024,8
01/29/93 000260
01/29/93 000260
01/29/93 000260
0i/29/93 000261
01/29/93 000261
01/29/93 000261
01/29/93 000261
01/29/93 000261
01/29/93 000261
01/29/93 000261
01/29/93 000261
01/29/93 000262
01/29/93 000262
01/29/95 000262
01/29/93 000262
01/29/93 000267
01/29/93 000285
01/29/93 000285
01/29/93 0002~
01/29/93 000305
01/~9/93 000305
PESTRASTER SERVICE
PETROLANE
PETROLAHE
PETROLANE
RAN-TEC RUBBER STAHP MF
RAN-TEC RUBBER STAHP MF
RAN-TEC RUBBER STAHP MF
RANCHO BLUEPRINT
RANCHO BLUEPRINT
-RANCHO BLUEPRINT
RANCHO BLUEPR/NT
RANCHO BLUEPRINT
RANCHO BLUEPR[MT-
RANCHO BLUEPRINT
RANCHO BLUEPRINT
RANCNO MATER
RANCHO HATER
RANCHO MATER
RANCHO MATER
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE D
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
STRACHOTA INSURANCE
TARGET STORE
TARGET STORE
13956
13955
1395L
CITYVIDE R.O.g. UEED CO 100-1~4-~-5/,02
FUELIK]TCHEN EOC
FUEL/KITCHEN EOC
FUEL/KITCHEN EOC
001-166-999-5263
001 - 166-999-5263
001-166-999-5263
IDEAL 2 STAMP; CITY OF
UPDATE ON CURRENT STAMP
TAX
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
PM92-05
TR 23267-2 & SEN[OR CEN
NISC. BLUEPRINTS, ETC.
MISC. BLUEPRINTS, ETC.
NISC. BLUEPRINTS, ETC.
VEST
BLUEPRINTS
NISC. BLUEPRINTS, ETC.
001-1280
001-163-999-5268
001-16~-999-5268
001-163-999-5268
001-16~-999-5268
190-180-999-5268
001-163-999-5268
001-163-999-5268
MATER CHARGES 11/12-12/
RATER CHARGES 11/12-12/
MATER CHARGES 11/12-12/
kVkTER CHARGES 11/12-12/
190-180-999-52~0
190-180-999-52~.0
193-180-999-5240
191 - 180-999-5240 '
SERV. REND. JAN-HARCH 9 001-2010
COlIT. BLDG PERHIT - ORN 001-162-~-5222
TAX 001-162-~-5222
POLICY NO ACN21828302 300-1~-~-5204
RECREATION SUPPLIES
CHRISTIS PROG.
190-180-999-5300
190-180-999-5300
1,395.28
2,197.25
47.55
90.47
219.00
87.69
183.21
202.58
50.57
6.58
12.67
.29
1.28
.42
1.86
975.00
23.05
26.55
12.19
18.00
18.~
2.~
439.62
3.10
21.72
13.79
3.77
15.62
4.57
2.08
46.54
1,117.78
7'31.40
88.83
129,606.10
441.49
3~.22
141.00
50.36
598.27
PAGE 4
CHECK
AMOUNT
15,058.45
975.00
61.79
39.54
504.27
1,98~.55
129,606.10
675.71
161.00
VOUCHRE2
01129193
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUIiER
13956
13957
13958
13958
13938
13958
13959
13959
13960
13961
13962
13962
13962
13962
13962
13964
13964
139~4
13965
13966
13967
13967
13968
13968
13968
13968
13969
13970
13970
13970
13970
13970
13970
13970
13971
15:11
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK ~GIS~R
FOR ALL PER]OOS'
CHECK VEli)OI~ VENDOR ]TEN
DATE NLI46ER NAME DESCRIPTION
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01129193
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01 / 29193
01129/93
01129193
01/29/93
01129193
01 / 29193
01129193
00O307
000320
000325
O0O325
0OO325
000325
000326
000326
000339
000342
000375
000375
00O375
000375
00O375
000381
000389
000389
000389
000608
000423
000426
000426
000630
000430
000430
000430
000431
000666
000466
000666
000444
000666
000646
000666
000448
01/29/93
TENECULA TR{N~HY
15T &)RO PLACE TROPHZE
TOIdN CENTER STATIONERS TONER/EOC
UNITED MAY OF THE INLAN 000325 IN
UNITED MAY OF THE [NLAN 000325 Ug
UNITED MAY OF THE INLAId 000325 UN
UNITED MAY OF THE INLAN 000325 U~
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
2-SETS OF ONIFORNS; CLE
RENTAL
klEST PUBL/SHING COMPANY PUBLICATIONS
MINDSOR PARTNERS ' RANC FEB RENT & TI'S/CAN FOR
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 9O9-202-6770 DEC CHARGE
SOUTHERN CAL]F TELEPHON 714-287-699~ DEC CHARGE
SOUTHERN CALZF TELEPHON 716-349-3436 DEC CHARGE
.SOUTNERN CALIF TELEPHON 716-349-3439 DEC CHARGE
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON 716-765.8550 DEC CHARGE
TIRITZLLZ, STEVE d. 16'6 FEBRUARY RENT
USCN 000:589 PT RETIR
USCH 00038~ PT RETIR
USCN 00038~ PT RETIR
AGRICRED[T ACCEPTANCE C 67 0006180 9100062 FEB
H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU RECREATION SUPPLIES
RANClIO INDUSTRIAL $UPPL 2000 SANDBAGS
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL TAX
GROUP ANERICA - VOLUNTA
GROUP AM_~ERICA - VOLUNTA
GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA
GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA
INSURANCE PRENION/JAN
INSURANCE PREMIUN/JAN
INSURANCE PREMIUM/JAM
INSURANCE PRENIUt4/JAN
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, INSURANCE PRENIUN
ENPLOYNENT DEVELOPHENT 6TH QTR TAXES
ENPLOYNENT DEVELOI:NENT 6TH QTR TAXES
ENPLOYNENT DEVELOPMENT 4TH QTR TAXES
ENPLOYNENT DEVELOPMENT 6TH QTR TAXES
ENPLOYNENT DEVELOPMENT 6TH OTR TAXES
ENPLOYHENT DEVELOPNENT 6TH QTR TAXES
ENPLOYHENT DEVELOPHENT 6TH QTR TAXES
NOOSE BUSINESS FORMS 1613A3R; 16 7/8 X 11 CO
ACCOUNT
NI!CER
100-182-999-5M0
001-166-999-52/,2
001-2120
100-2120
190-2120
300-2120
100-166-999-5263
190-180-999-5263
001-120-999-5228
001-199-999-5236
001-110-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
001-163-999-5208
001 - 120-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
190-182-999-5236
001-2160
100-2160
190-2160
190-180-999-5239
190-180-~-5300
100-164-999-5218
100-164-999-5218
001-2510
100-2510
190-2510
300-2510
001-1180
001-2070
100-2070
001-2350
1 O0 - 2350
190-2350
192,2350
330-2350
001-160-999-5220
ITEN
ANOUNT
25:a6
215.65
77.64
9.26
19.10
.50
12.50
13.60
333.63
29,118.71
64.71
4.69
8.55
2.35
13.16
3,376.93
206.86
108.00
133.58
866.02
29.69
600.00
66.50
221.22
36.68
86.90
1.80
15.75
16.75
~.50
648.62
172.47
676.62
40.72
62.64
9O.50
PAGE 5
CHECK
ANOUNT'
25.86
215.65
106.50
26.10
333.63
29,118.71
93.26
3,376 ~
~8.~
84~6.02
29.69
646.50
364.60
15.75
1,4~6.32
VOUCHRE2
01/29/93
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
13971
13971
13971
13971
13971
13972
13973
13976
13976
13976
13976
13973
13976
13977
13977
13977
13
13979
13980
13980
13980
13980
13981
13981
13982
13982
15:11
CHECK
DATE
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01129193
01/29/~P~
01/29/;r3
01/29/~
01/29/93
01/29/93
0.1/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
VEm
BUIIER
00O64,8
000448
000~8
0004,48
0002~8
000~71
000512
000517
'000517
000517
000517
000518
000531
000532
000532
000532
000581
000596
00060~
-000609
00060~
00060~
000639
000639
0006~3
000~43
NANE
ffi:X)RE BUSINESS FORMS
MOORE BUSINESS FORMS
K)ORE BUSINESS FORHS
MOORE BUSINESS FORMS
I, KX)RE BUSINESS FORMS
IGOE '& COI~ANY
CADET UNIFORM
ENTENNANN-ROVIN & CO
ENTENNANN-ROVIN & CO
ENTENI4ANN-ROVIN & CO
ENTENMANN-ROVIN & co
CITY OF TENEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR N.L PERIODS
ITB!
DESCRIPTION
FREIGHT
TAX
1099 MI'SC. FORMS (5 'PAR
FREIGHT
TAX
FLEX PLAN/DECEMBER
ENTRY RUG SERVICE: CITY
153-1 TWO-TONE BADGE;
HANDLING
FREIGHT
TAX
DEL RIO CARE ANINAL HOS VET SERVICES
SO. CAL. ASSOCIATION OF REGISTRATION FOR 1993 S
SECURITY PACIFIC NAT'L
'SECURITY PACIFIC NAT'L
SECURITY PACIFIC NAT,L
HOTEL RESERV,
6798 0200 0001 0872/DEC
679802000001 0773 DEC
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-160-~-5220
001-160-999-5220
001-160-~-5220
001-160-~)~-5220
001-160-9~-5220
001-150-999-5250
001-1~-~-5250
001-100-~-5220
001-100-999-5220
001-100-999-5220
001-100-~-5220
001-170-~-5285
001-100-~99-5258
001-120-99~-5258
190-180-999-5260
001-110,~-5258
NATURES RECIPE DO6 FQOO/K-9 001-170-999-5327
LEAGUE OF CA CITIES/LAF CORFERENCE/2/26-2/25 .
DOUBLETREE SUITES
DOtiLETREE SUITES
DOUBLETREE SUITES
DOUBLETREE SUITES
PHONE CHG
PHONE CHGS
PHONE CHGS
PHONE CHGS
BELL BLUE PRINT COMPANY 5 SETS OF BLUE PRINTS S
BELL BLUE PRINT COMPANY TAX
FORTNER HARDMARE
FONTNER HARDMARE
BOBRICK HAND DRYER COVE
TAX
1398~ 01/29/93 000653 LUCI~ STORE FOOl) EOC
13983 01/29/93 000653 LUCICf STORE FO00 EOC
RIVERS/DE CO. HEALTH SE VECTOR CONTROL SERVICE/,
001 - 150-99~-5258
01/29/93
01/29/93
000678
000705
13984
13985
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
000726
000726
000724
000726
000724
13986
13986
13986
13986
13986
001-166-999-5451
001-1(~-999-5651
001-166-999:5651
001-166-999-5651
210-199-801-5802
210-1~9-801-5802
190-180-9~-5212
190-180-~-5212
001-166-999-5650
001-166-~-5650
001-162-~-5250
ACCESS DATA LTPASS FOR DOS 320-1~-999-5221
A & R coSTON SCREEN PRI
A & R CUSTUM SCREEN PRI
A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI
A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI
A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI
SATIN AMARD JACKETS (53
SATIN AWARD JACKETS XXL
HOOOED SgEATSHIRTS (2)
HOODED SMEATSHIRTS )O(LR
TAX
190-183-907-5300
190-183-907-5300
190-183-907-5300
190-183-907o5300
190-183-907-5300
ITEM
AMOUNT
29.50
7.02
82.96
3.79
6.63
27'5.90
55.6~
2.00
2.08
6.67
16.80
55.00
167.02
22.08
65.27
19.96
170.00
36.39
21.28
60.58
18.98
120.60
9.35
333.?V
25.87
810.75
225.82,
37.50
157.25
273.00
81.00
178.00
116.00
69.60
PAGE 6
CHECK
AMOUNT
220.20
273.90
36.25
64.19
14.80
55.00
254.37
19.9~
170.00
117.Z~
129.95
359.66
1,036.59
37.50
157.25
VOUCHRE2
01/29/93
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NLIIER
13987
13988
13989
13990
13990
13990
13990
13990
13990
13~90
13991
13991
13~91
13992
13 ~93
1399~
13995
13996
13996
13996
13996
13~96
13996
13996
13996
13997
13997
13~7
15:11
CHECK
DATE
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/~
01/29/93
01/2~/~3
01/29/F_t
01/29/93
01129/93
01/2f/93
01/29/f3
01/2~/93
01/29/93
01/2~/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01129193
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01129/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01/29/93'
01/2~/93
01/29/93
01/29/93
01129193
VEIl)OR
NLeW, R
00072~
00072~
000731
0007'~
000768
000768
000768
000768
000768
000768
000768
000776
000776
000776
000782
00O82]
000826
000827
000828
000828
000828
000828 -
000828
000828
000828
000828
0008~9
000829
000829
NANE
IK)ItDPERFECT CORP,
mPERFECT CORP,
NATIONAL SENINARS OROIJP
FOOl) ~ LESS
TIRE SYSTERS
TIRE SYSTENS
TIlE SYSTENS
TIlE SYSTENS
TIlE SYSTENS
TIlE SYSTEMS
TIRE SYSTERS
PO~ER UP!
PO~ER UP!
I~R UP!
ENERGENCY PET CLINIC
BIOCYCLE
TRAVEL TRUST
LINCOLN INSTITUTE OF LA
HOLIDAY FOODS
HOLIDAY FOODS
HOLIDAY FOODS
HOLIDAY FOOOS
HOLIDAY FOODS
ROLlDAY FOODS
HOLIDAY FOODS
HOLIDAY FOOOS
PICNIC PEOPLE.
PICNIC PEOPLE
PICNIC PEOPLE
CITY OF TBEClJLA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
l TEN
DESCRIPTZOR
llORDPERFECT SOFTMARE SU
TAX
SENINAR/VALERIE
FOOD EOC
4201; IO0/SHEETS PER PA
4203; IO0/SHEETS PER PA
42~5; IO0/SHEETS PER PA
4593; 12 1t3NTH CALENDAR
6405; PLASTIC BUSINESS
FREIGHT
TAX
AH~081 - PERFECT CALLIG
FREIGHT
TAX
VETERINARY SERVICES FOR
REGISTRATION FOR BIOCYC
AIRFARE. FOR YOSER]TE CO
REG[STRATION/TRANS & LA
FOOl) EOC
FOOD EOC
FOOl) EOC
F{X)D EOC
FOOD EOC
FOOl) EOC
FOOl) EOC
FOOD EOC
FOOl) EOC
FOOl) EOC
BAGGED LUNCHES EOC
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
320-1W-;-5228
320-199-999-5228
001 - 161-999-5258
001 - 166-999-5450
190-180-999-5~.0
190-180-999-5220
1~0-180-~-5220
150-180-~-5220
1~N)-lB0-F~;-5220
1~q)-180-~-5220
lf~)- 180-~;-5220
320-1~-~-5221
320-1W-~-5221
320-199-~-5221
001-170-~-52~
001-100-~-5258
001 - 161 -~-5258
001 - 100-9'~-5258
001 - 166-999-5450
001 - 166-999-5450
001 - 166- 999- 5450
001 - 166-999-5450
001 - 166-999-5450
001-166-999-5450
001 - 166-~9-5450
001-16&-~-54.50
001 - 166-999-5450
001 - 16&-~-5450
001 - 16&-~-5450
ITEN
AI~
200.00
15.50
138.00
169.50
6.75
9.50
6.75
5.00
5.00
3.00
2.38
ff.00
11 .~5
7.67
/,4.00
365.00
12~.00
135.00
~81.07
238.77
2,0~3.79
692.30
1,472.9/, .
288.28
253.79
1,692,16
3,501.88
2,101.13
3,027.78
PAGE 7
CHECK
215.50
169.50
118.62
44.O0
345.00
135.00
7,463.08
8,g0.79
TOTAL CHECKS
258,590.65
VOUCHRE2
01129193
15:52
CiTY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
140 COI4NUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT
190 COI,IIJNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 RODEVELOPIqENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 ]NFORKATIUN SYSTEMS
TOTAL
,NIOUNT
18,513.22
55,629.55
1,Q68.30
16,757.80
561.00
23,315.86
246,623.39
13,584.57
3,050.00
1,974.84
381,078.53
VOIJCHRE2
01/2~/93
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUHBER
16001
16002
16002
16002
16002
16002
16002
16002
16002
16002
16002
16002
16002
~6002
16002
16002
16002
16002
16002
16003
16003
16003
16003
16003
16003
16003
16003
16003
16003
14003
16003
16003
16003
16003
16003
16003
16003
16003
16003
16003
16003
16003
16003
16003
16003
16003
16003
16003
15:52
CHECK
DATE
02/0~/~3
02/09/93
02/09/~3
02109193
02109/93
02/09193
02/0~/93
02/0~/93
02/09/93
02/0~/93
02/09/93
02109193
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/~/93
02109193
02/09/93
02109/93
02/04/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/0~/93
02/09/93
o2/o~/93
02109193
o2/o9/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02109193
02/09/93
o2/o9/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
o2/o9/93
02/O9/93
02/0~/93
02109193
02/0~/93
02/O9/93
00012~
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
*000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
VENDOR
NH
BURG WILLIAHS & SORENS
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFOeNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFOeNIA LANOSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFOeNIA LANOSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALl FORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALl FORNIA LANI)SCAPE
CALI FORM I A LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENN!ES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PROOUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENtilES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENIIIES OFFICE PRCOUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRCOUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRCOUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
MG)AFFANE, CAROL VS 12/
KATERIAL TO REPAIR IRRI
LABOR FOR REPAIR OF ZRR
PROVIDE HATERIAL HECESS
LABOR NECESSARY TO REMO
PROVIDE LABOR AND HATER
LOCKING GUICK COUPLER B
TVO (23 HRS LABOR
PROVIDE LABOR AND HATER
1" BRASS BALL VALVES
HOURLY UAGE FOR LABOR F
LABOR; RELOCATE IRRIGAT
EgtJIPfEHT; SPORTS PARK
HATERIAL; SPORTS PARK R
PROVIDE LABOR AND HATER
INSTALLATION OF 1600 Sg
ANNUAL LANDSCAPE CONTRA
ANNUAL LANDSCAPE CONTRA
ANNUAL LANDSCAPE CONTRA
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES/CI
TENPLATE, CIVIL ENG RAD
TELEDYNE POST PARALLEL
TAX FOR PARALLEL RULING
TAX FOR TEMPLATE, CIVIL
DISCOUNT
HELZX ERASING SHIELDS
TAX
2 APPT BOOKS
5A-F1-153L FILE FOLDERS
TAX
5AN135270 CLASP ENVELOP
5AM135266 CLASP ENVELOP
TAX
BOOKCASE
NZ-ABG-I-IO; CATAL06 CA
N2-R68~21-712 BUS CARD
F8-151612 EXP REDROPE F
02-BM1732 NU-KOTE ALQ R
02-P600~OA; ALPS ALQ CO
08-10602 TRIMHER 5 X 8
DISCOUNT
TAX
CUSTOM AWARD PLAOUE K63
TAX
F4-00726; BANKERS BOX F
5A-D3-654-Y; POSTIT NOT
5A-O9-26000; YELLOW HIG
5A-PA-3311; BLUE NED,PT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-130-~-52~6
193-180-~-5510
193-180-~9-5510
193-180-~-5510
193-180-999-5510
193-180-999-5510
193-180-99~-5510
193-180-99~-5510
190-180-~9~-5212
1~-180-~-5510
193-180-999-5510
210-1~0-12~-5804
210-1~0-129-580~
210-190-129-580/,
1~0-180-f9~-5212
190-180-999-5250
1~0-180-~-5250
191-180-~-5510
193-180-~9~-5510
001-110,999-5220
001-163-9~-5220
001-163-~-5262
001-163-~-5262
001-163-~-5220
001-163-~-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-~-5220
001-110-~99-5220
001-162-9~-5220
001-162-~-5220
001-162-999-5220
001-120-~-5220
001-120-~9~-5220
001-120-~-5220
001-110-~-5220
320-199-999-5221
320-199-~9~-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-~-5221
320-199-~-5221
320-199-~9-5221
320-199-9~9-5221
320-199-999-5221
001-120-~-5220
001-120-~-5220
001-162-~99-5220
001-162-99~-5220
001-162-~-5220
001-162-9~-5220
ITEM
AMOUNT
2,590.25
77.05
266.00
202.30
100.00
812.65
39. O0
32. O0
327.00
18.70
50.00
1,440.00
110.00
698.68
6,103,00
663.00
9,664.8O
561. O0
21,738.16
338.22
10.61
89.95
6.97
.62
2.65-
.88
.07
12.69
62.76
18.50
6.30
9.80
5.80
1.21
78.50
105.00
18.25
28.75
53.94
87.90
15.95
7.17-
23.65
198.00
15.35
37.35
7.08
3.OO
1.09
PAGE 2
CHECK
ANOtJNT
2,590.25
62,883.34
VOUCHRE2
01/29~3
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
14003
14003
14003
14003
14003
14003
14003
14003
14004
14004
14005
14005
14006
14007
14007
14007
14007
14007
141~7
14
14007
14008
14008
14008
14008
14008
14008
· 14008
14008
14008
14008
14008
14008
14008
14008
14008
14008
14008
14008
14008
14008
14008
14008
14'008
14008
1400~,
15:52
CHECK
DATE
02/09/9"~
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/9~
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/9~
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
VEMOOR
NIJIiER
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000202
000202
000231
000231
000251
000257
000237
000257
000257
000257
000257
000257
000257
000269
000269
000269
000269
000269-
000269
000269
000269
000269
000269
000269
000269
000269
000269
000269
000269
000269
000269
000269
-000269
000269
000269
000269
000269
000269
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOI)S
PAGE 3
VENDOR ITEN ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
RANE DESCRePT]ON NUIiER ANOUNT AHOUNT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODtJCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRII)UCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PROOUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PROOUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
J.F. DAVIDSON
J.F. DAVIDSON
NBS/LOlaIY
NBS/LOHRY
PLANNING CENTERe THE
RANTEK
RAHTEK
RANTEK
RAMTEK
RANTEK
RANTEK
RAMTEK
RANTEK
5A-PA-33611; BLUE NF.D.P 001-162-~-57.20
5A-A9-14-1411NBL; DATA 001-162-~-5220
5A-HB-1600-3; STACKABLE 001-162-9g~-5220
TAX 001-162-~-5220
5A-03-76610; STENOBOOK 001-162-~-5220
TAX 001-162-~-5220
7-13-117; 3" ZIPPER RIN 001-100-~-5220
TAX 001-100-~-5220
CONSULTING/OCTORER
CONSULTING CItEDIT
100-164-999-5406
100-164-999-5406
CONSULTING ENGINEERING 100-164-999-52~8
CONTRACT SERV./11/28-12 210-190-129-5804
PREPARATION OF THE CITY 001-161-~-5248
CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT
RENTENTZON ADJUSTMENT P
RETENTION
TIE & NATERIALS 12/18
STREET NAINTENANCE, STR
SCHEDULED STREET NAINT,
TIHE & NATERIAL 1/06/9~
6046R/6051R/6043R/6045R
210-165-623-5804
210-165-623-5804
210-2035
100-164-999-5402
100-164-999-5402
100-164-999-5402
100-164-999-5401
100-164-999-5402
ROG 27802 ROGERS SAFET
141414680-3 GREEN 314 POSTI
141414680-8 PURPLE 314 POST
1411M680-5 YELLOH 314 POST
NCG/LL PAPERPtJNCH 14CG-5
AC018804 ACCO LABEL NO
PLY0454 PLYNOUTN RUBBE
PLY0418 PLYHOUTN RUBBE
DEN12-205 DENNISON VHI
DEN11-030 DENNZSON VHIT
C-L05550 ASST, COLOR 5-
C-L620.T~ STD, 1/1', NON G
ANP23-776 ANPAD GREEN C
CRD60118 CARDINAL ONE-S
C-E-COR54 9X12 RECYCLE
C-E-COR56 10X13 RECYCL
BEN-07-T58 BENCNI4ARK HE
AVY-P1-213-BC AVERY STD
AW-P1-213-8 AVERY STD
SAN-25076 SANFORD MAJOR
SAN-25005 SANFORO NAJOR
SAN-25019 SANFORD MAJOR
BRL-8235 BEROL NARKER -
001-163-999-5220
001 - 163-999-5220
001-16]-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001 - 163-999-5220
001 - 163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001 - 163-999-5220
001 - 163-999-5220
001 - 163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001 - 163-999-5220'
001 - 163-999-5220
001 - 163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001 - 163-999-5220
001 - 163-999-5220
001 - 163-999-5220
001 - 163- 999 - 5220
DEN-24-877 DENNISON liAR 001-163-999-5220
WqNC388LK - 3N SCOTCH T 001-163-999-5220
1.09
2.49
10.14
4.82
1.95
.15
198.00
15.35
14,132.~6
4,132.~6-
745.00
8,115.00
1,218.64
4~6.66
171.53-
18~.15
197.80
33,315.!0
1,401.08
7,242.42
1.33
1.49
1.49
1.49
5.81
4.07
4.25
2.55
14.79
10.20
44.25
5.01
71.76
8,90
9,90
10.00
13.32
6.66
6.88
7.08
1.18
11.64
9.84.
3.02
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSlOE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSlOE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSlOE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSlOE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SLIPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSlOE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSfOE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
1,462.16
10,000.00
8,860.00
8,7'58.75
43,884.32
VOUCHRE2
01/~9/93 15:52
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUNBER DATE
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/0~/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02109193
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/0~/93
14008 02/0~/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/0~/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09193
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
j 4008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/95
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/0~/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14008 02/09/93
14009 02/09/93
14009 02/09/93
VENDOR VENDOR
NLNBER M
00026~ RIVERSIDE OFFICE
00026~ RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
00026~ RIVERSIDE OFFICE
00026~ RIVERSIDE OFFICE
080268 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
00026~ RIVERSIDE OFFICE
0002(~ RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 R/VERSIDE OFFICE
000269. RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERS[DE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ZTBI
DESCRIPTION
SUPPLY 14144610-3/4-1 3N SCOTC
SUPPLY mN811-3/6-1 )N SCOTC
SUPPLY N4PAD GREEN CYCLE LEGAL
SUPPLY ROGERS DELUX STAYPUT PE
SUPPLY PLT-36203 PILOT FASTRAG
SUPPLY PLT-T/203 PILOT FASTRA
SUPPLY PLT-35335 (PV-SBLU) PIL
SUPPLY F-C-601~ (UB-lO2ORN) .
SUPPLY BRL-7~?~>XF BEROL ROLLER
SUPPLY PEN-CSOS-HB PENTEL SUE
SUPPLY TlffilMS BROS. RIVERSIDE
SUPPLY CRA-1001-82 CEANER "KIK
SLIPPLY AW-5766 AVERY LASER PT
SUPPLY AW-5066 AVERY LASER PT
SUPPLY AW-5366 AVERY LASERPT
SUPPLY AW-5266 AVERY LASER PT
SUPPLY AVY-P1213-SC AVERY STD
SUPPLY SAN-64002 SANFFORD LOGO
SUPPLY SAN-66010 SANFORD LOGO
SUPPLY $MIFORD JlJllO ERASER RE
SUPPLY PEN-Z-2-1 PENTEL REFILL
SUPPLY K-N-VS11-2(NE KIN SLANT
SUPPLY K-H-VS11-15BK KIN SLANT
SUPPLY K-H-VB11-1SSG I VlEk~i
SUPPLY M-J-384-SOR gILSON 4ORE
SUPPLY W-J-38~-:~B WILSON JONE
SUPPLY W-J-384-34.R WILSON JOEN
SUPPLY' W-J-38~-36BL WILSON JOR
SUPPLY. W-J-384-4gR WILSON JONE
SUPPLY W-J-38~-49J WILSON JORE
SUPPLY W-J-384-/~.C WILSON JORE
SUPPLY K-N-SRll-20GY K&N SLANT
SUPPLY W-J-38~-4/diL WILSON JON
SUPPLY W-J-38~-4/di WILSON JONE
SUPPLY III-C38PTY 314 SCOTCH TA
SUPPLY III-202-3/4 3N SCOTCH
SUPPLY LAB-CP20 LABELOR CLEAR
SUPPLY BENCHNARK RECYCLED ADD
SUPPLY KEN-R4OTAN KE-NASTER F
SUPPLY NNN-660YEL POST-IT 6X6
SUPPLY AIIPAD GREEN CYCLE STENO
SUPPLY SENCHNARK JUIIBO PAPER C
SUPPLY DURACELL 'AA' BATTERIES
$1JPPLY F-C-60040 (US-IO~BLK) F
SUPPLY DYiq158-06 DYNO VINYL E
SUPPLY'K-C-E717R KEITH CLARK F
SUPPLY TAX
000329 URBAN DES/GN STUDIO
00032~ URBAN DESIGN STUD]O
TE!IECULA OLD TOMI SPECI
TENECULA OLD T(M SPECI
ACCOUNT
NtNBER
001-16~-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-16~-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-9~9-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-16~-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
081-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-9~9-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
280-1~-9~9-5808
280-199-999-5808
ITEN
22.g2
5.02
22.18
9.16
9.07
12.17
6.96
7.56
8.60
65.25
47.64
31.47
31.47
31.47
16.98
16.56
27.24
27.24
9.24
18.96
37.40
13.60
2~.90
5.~6
5.~6
5.46
21.34
21.34
13.8Z
16.66
13.82
13.82
1.51
4.15
2.50
9.00
16.60
20.16
14.28
12,52
27.72
13,92
2.63
17.28
79.35
6,~5.05
7,139.52
PAGE 4
CHECK
ANOUNT
1,103.21
13,584.57
VOUCHRE2
01/29/93
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
14010
14011
14011
14012
14013
14013
14013
14013
14014
14014
14015
14016
14017
14017
14017
15:52
CHECK
DATE
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02109193
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02/09/93
02109193
02/09/93
02/09/93
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOB ALL PERIODS
VENDOB VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NIJNBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUNBER
000~ 1
0004.06
000/.06
000420
000437
000437
000437
000~37
WILLDAN ASSOCIATES
COBSULT/NG PUJOL & FIRS
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF OLD TOtal BIKE PATROL/DE
RIVERS[DE COUNTY SHERIF NURRZETA CREEK BED CLEA
TRANS-PACIFIC
NORELAND & ASSOCIATES
NOREl. AND & ASSOCIATES
NO~ELAND & ASSOCIATES
NORELAND & ASSOCIATES
000538 R.J. NOBLE CI3i~ANY
000538 R.J. NOeLE COMPANY
00058~ RICK ENGINEERING CONPAN
000603 CABLE & WIRELESS CONNtJN
R.W. CASH CONSTRUCTION
R.W. CASH CONSTRUCT]ON
R.W. CASH CONSTRUCTION
000660
000660
000660
00076~ LOHR ASSOCIATES, INC.
100-164-999-524.B
140-199-999-5281
001-170-999-5285
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: 300-1~-ggg-5205
CITY AUOZT 001-140-999-5248
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.AU 001-140-999-5248
SINGLE AUOIT 001-140-~99-5248
ACCOUNTING ASSISTANCE 001-140-~-5248
NARGARITA ROAD EXTENSIO 210-165-606-5804
RETENT]ON 210-2035
PROF. SERV. 10/31-11/27 210-165-606-5804
XC48114361 12/16-01/15/320-199-999-5208
PROGRESS 12/25/92
RETENT]ON
12/25/92 PROGRESS BILL
210-190-129-5804
210-2035
210-190~129-5804
PREPARE LEGAL DESC./JAN 001-163-999-5224
ITEM
ANOUNT
2,5~.00
1,068.30
284.88
3,050.00
1,095.04
200.00
200.00
165.00
152,6~5.89
15,264.59-
9,364.22
1,648.7'/
91,256.70
9,774.49'
6,4,88.21
3,000.00
PAGE 5
CHECK
ANOUNT
· 2,54./e.00
1,353.18
3,050.00
1,660.0~
137,381.30
9,364.22
1,648.77
87,970.42
3,000.00
TOTAL CHECKS
381,078.53
ITEM
NO.
4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
February 9, 1993
SUBJECT:
Revised Vesting Final Tract Map No. 23103
PREPARED BY: ~ Dennis Armstrong, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That City Council extend the Revised Vesting Tentative Map, and then approve the Final Tract
Map No. 23103, subject to the Conditions of Approval.
BACKGROUND:
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23103 Amendment No. I was recommended for approval
by Riverside County Planning Commission on November 8, 1988, and found consistent with
the Comprehensive General Plan, Specific Plan No. 199 Amendment No. 1, and the zoning
which had been applied to the Specific Plan through Change of Zone No. 5107.
A first extension of time was granted on May 28, 1991 and the second extension of time was
granted on May 26, 1992 by the Temecula City Council. 'There is an application for a third
and final extension of time that was filed on September 29, 1992 that would extend' the
expiration date of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23103 to November 8, 1993, but due
to the timely filing of the application, the expiration date of the Tentative Map will be
automatically extended for sixty (60) days under Section 66463.5, Paragraph (c) of the
Subdivision Map Act. During this 60-day period, the Final Tract Map may record without the
City Council acting on approval of the' extension of time. Once the sixty (60) days has
expired, the City Council must first extend the map before approving the Final Map for
recordation.
As a Condition of Approval for the second extension of time for Vesting Tentative Map No.
23103, the Subdivider is required to deposit with the City an amount sufficient to cover the
construction of that portion of Butterfield Stage Road between where the easterly property
line intersects with the westerly right-of-way line and extends to intersect with the centerline
of the street. This portion of Butterfield Stage Road shall be completed by the developer of
Tract Map No. 23209, and said funds shall be reimbursed to the developer of Tract Map No.
23209 upon completion of the improvements. The refund for the reimbursement of the
offsite improvements to Butterfield Stage Road as conditioned is to be disbursed by the City
of Temecula through the attached Agreement entered into with the Developer of Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 23103.
-1 - PwO1%egdrPt4,93t,0209~,23103 0127
Vesting Final Tract Map No. 23103 is a residential subdivision consisting of 18 residential lots
and one open apace lot within 29.1 acres on the property generally located on the west side
of Butterfield Stage Road between La Serena Way and Rancho California Road in the City of
Temecula. The average lot size is 1.13 acres, which is consistent with the Change of Zone
No. 5107.
The following fees have been paid (or deferred} for Revised Vesting Final Tract Map No.
23103.
Area Drainage Fees
(Deferred to Grading Permits)
To be determined
O
Fire Mitigation fees
(Deferred to Building Permits)
7,200.00
O
Traffic Signal Mitigation Fee
(Deferred to Building Permits)
2,700.00
Stephen's K-Rat Fees
(To be paid at Grading Permits)
To be determined
O
Parks and Recreation (Quimby Fees)
20,700.00
o Street Improvement (off~ite) Development fees
38,066.00
The following bonds have been posted for Revised Vesting Final Tract Map no. 23103:
Streets and Drainage
Water Improvements
Sewer
Survey Monuments
Faithful Performance
$ 707,000.00
$ 256,000.00
$ 64,000.00
Other Bonds
9,000.00
Labor & Materials
e 353,500.00
$128,000.00
$ 32,000.00
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Development Fee Checklist
Location Map
Copy of Map
Riverside County Planning Commission Staff Report
Conditions of Approval
Agreement for deposit and reimbursement of funds for street improvements
Fees and Securities Report
-2- pwO1%agdrpt%93%O209%23103 0127
ATTACHMF~T 1
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECELIST.
CITY OF TIJECULA
DEVEIIJPNENT FEE C~RC~-X~
Revised'VssttnKFlnalTmetNapNo. ~326?-3
The following fees were reviewed by Staff x-elative to their applicability to this
project.
Fee
Habitat Conservation Plan
( K -Rat)
PaPks and Recr~,ation
(Qulmby)
Public Facility
Condition of ADDroyal
Condition No. 1
Condition No. 6
Condition No. 3'7
Traffic Signal Mitigation
Fire Mitigation
Condition No. 18
See ~ Department Letter
Dated 9-20-88
Flood Control
(ADP)
Regional Statistical Area
(RSA)
Condition No. 31
N/A
Staff Findings:
Staff finds that the project will be consistent with the City's General Plan once
adopted.
The project is a part of specific plan No. 199 Amendment No. 1 and the zoning which
has been applied to the specific plan through Change of Zone Case 5107.
ATTACHMENT 2
LOCATION MAP
CITY OF TEMECULA
To San D,eOo
Location Map
CASE NO.: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 23103
EXHIBIT: A
VICINITY MAP
S~STA~3 1 (~,2.
ATTACHMENT
COPY OF MAP
El
II
I
I
I
TRACT NO. 23102
Md. l/,4,4.48
I
I ,cz, 7
I
I """ /I I
I /'. ~ !1
' /
~' / '1 I
/
~ ~ ;~~ ', I·
u~ I
I
I
/ ~ ~
I / ~
' '
I r ~ ~ ~ I
ATTACHMF~T 4
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DATED November 23, 1988
DATE
TO:
RiVE:DiDE cotl, nc.
PL nnin DE : CnEnC
November 23, 1988
-Surveyor
Road
Building & Safety
Flood Control
Health
Fire Protection RE: TENTATIVE TRACT/PARGEE HAP NO, 23103 Amd, 1
REGIONAL TEAI~ NO, Specific Plans meam
The Riverside county F1 Planning Director/F~lBoard of Supervisors has taken the following
action on the above referenced tentative map:
RG :mp
x APPROVED tentative map subject to the attached conditions (no waiver request submitted),
DENIED tentative map based on the attached findings,
APPROVED tentative map subject to attached conditions and DENIED request
of the final map,
for ·waiver
__ APPROVED tentative map and APPROVED request for waiver of the final .map,
APPROVED 3 Extens)on--_o.f Time to
al 1 previous ly app~rVed,,-cond_~-~.Ons,
..~.:.~
'.APPROVED Extension of--Time-to . ?"*.':.'.~-
al 1 previously approved: conditions:. and-:the attached. addi t.tonai conditions,
__ APPROVED withdrawal of t, entrbite-map.
__ APPROVED Minor Change to reV)..se"~.rigi.~ally approved conditions as shown (attached).
~ .,___~__~ ._
APPROVED Minor Change to revise originally approved map (attached).
DENIED request for Minor Change,
APPROVED Minor Change to waive the final map,
Very truly yours, . ~:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLAfiNi'NG DEPARTMENT"
Roger S. ct: cter, P1 a i ng Di rector
Ron Goldman, Principal Planner
subject to
subject to
SORVEVOR ~;*~.WHZTEI ROAD - BLUE
,s-=~ cu~. ~o/as~ HEALTH - PINK
m .
4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 787-6181
BUILDING & SAFETY - GREEN
FIRE PROTECTION - GOLDENROD
FLOOD- CANARY
46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
(619) 342-8277
SUBMITTAL TO THE IOA~ OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~
FROM: P]anntng Department SUBMITTAL DATE: November 8, 1988
SUBaF. CT: VESTING TENTATIVE and TENTATIVE TRACTS located tn the ~"~_~'
Hargartta Vtllage 5pectfic Plan (SP ]g9 Amendment No. 1) - First
M and Third $uperfisortal' Districts - Rancho California Zoning Area.
RECO MENDEDMOTION:
Recetve and File the Planntng CmntssJon action of 9-28-88 and
10-5-88 for
APPROVAL of Vesting Tentative Tracts 23371 Amended No. 1, 23372
Amended No. 1, 23373 Amended No. 1, 23470 and'23471 and Tracts
22915, 22916, 23100 Amended No. 1, 2310~ 23102, and 23103 Mended
No. 1.
Rm~~Streeter, P ] anni ng. Di rector
AGENDA NC
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING CI31~ISSZON MINUTES OCTOBER 5, 1988
(AGENDA/TENS 5-2, 5-3, 5-4 - REEL 1003, SIDE 1 - TAPE 6, SIDE 1)
VESTING TRACT NAP 23373 ANENDE]) NO. 1 - EA 32548 - Hargartta Vtllage
Development Company - Rancho California Area - First/Third Supervisorial
Districts - south of Rancho California Rd, west of Kaiser Parkway - 348
units - 31~ acres - 5P 199 Zone. Schedule A
VESTING TRACT NAP 23371ANENDE]) NO. % - EA 32546 - Hargartta Village
Development Company - Rancho'Caltfo~nta Area - Ftrst/Thtrd.Supervlsorlal
Districts - north of Rancho California Rd, east of Hargartta Rd - 1183 untts -
398± acres - SP 199 Zone. Schedule A
VESTING TRACT 23372 ENDED NO. I - EA 32547 - Hargartta Vtllage Development
Company - Rancho Collfornta Area - Ftrst/ThtrdSupervtsortal DIstricts - north
of Rancho California Rd, west of Kaiser Parkway - 469 untts on 66 lots - 44~
acres - SP 199 Zone. Schedule A
The hearings ere opened at 6:50 p.m. and Closed at 7:11 p.m.
STAFF RECO!~fNDATZON: Adoptton of the negative declarations for EA 32548, EA
32545, and EA 32547, approval of Vesttng Tract Haps 23373 Amended No. 1, 23371
Amended No. 1 and 23372 Amended No. 1, al1 subject tothe proposed conditions.
Hs. Gifford. also recommended approval'of a watver of the length to width ratio
for Vesting Tract 23371 Amended No. 1. The subject tract maps were located
within Village A of the Hargartta Village Spectftc Plan, and would'create 1763
residential lots and a golf course on 254 ac~es. Staff had found the tract
maps to be consistent with the'adopted spectftc plan. Hs. Gtfford recommended
several changes to the conditions of approval. Commissioner Purviance asked
about a fiscal impact report, and was tnformed this report had been furnished
recently for Amendment No. I to the spectftc plan.
Jim Resney, representing the applicant, briefly reviewed-the development,
advising they were proposing a state-of-the-art adult retirement community
which included a championship golf course with a 37,000 square foot clubhouse
facility in the center of the project. He then referred to Condition 33(f)
for all three tract maps, ,hich required front yards to.be provided wtth
landscaping and automatic irrigation, and requested that thts requirement
deleted for larger lots, as tt was hts opinion that these homeowners would
prefer to do their own landscaping. The CC&Rs would requtre them to comply
with specific standards..Nr. Resney requested that this condition be amended
by adding to the end "or 'shall be 1natalled wtthtn 75 days after close of
escrow as provided in the CC&Rs in the 45x100 square foot lot areas".
Road Department Condition 21 for Tract Hap 23371 and Condition 14 for the
other two tract maps required a'debrts retention wall where block walls were
required at the top of slopes. Nr. Resney requested that thls condition be
amended by adding: "If applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
Road Commissioner that a Hastar Homeo~ners Association or other enttty wtll
satisfactorily matntatn the slopes, the Road Commissioner may, at his option,
waive this requirement of a debris retention ~ra11." He thought that tf they
could convince the Road Commissioner that there would be no silting problems
and that the slopes would be maintained, the debrts retention wall would not
53
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COee4ZSSZON NINUTES OCTOBER 5, 1988
be needed. For aesthetic reasons, he felt tt would be better not to have the
small wall.
Road Department Condition 22 for Tract 23372 and Condition 15 for the other
two tract maps related to the arintmum 30 foot garage setback from face Of
curb. Nr. Resney felt this condition conflicted ~lth the speclftc plan
development standards whtch allowed 16 foot driveways wtth roll up doors,
setback etther from the back of curb or the back of sidewalk. He would prefer
to have the spectflc plan standards applled, but requested that the hearings
not be continued.
Lee Johnson advtsed the slump wall delineated tn Road Department Condition 2Z
was a wall they had been requiring for the past three or four years when the
Planntng Oeparment requtred a block wall at the top of a slope. Depending on
the stze of the slope, the Road Department Design Engtneer could require a two
block high wall at the property line to keep the debris washing down the slope
from crossing the sidewalk. They NOUld be wtlltng to consider any other
alternative the developer mtght suggest, as long as tt accomplished the
purpose of thts condition. He requested that thts condition be retained.
Commissioner Donahoe asked whether adding to the end eOr as approved by the
Road Department" would give the developer the opportunity to provide an
alternative plan, and Mr. Johnson agreed that tt would.
Nr. JohnSon advtsed the garage setback requtred by Road Department Condition
22 for Tract 23371 (Condition 15 for Tracts 23372 and 23373) was the minimum
setback requtred by Ordinance 460. He had read the language requested by the
applicant, but would prefer to retatn the condition. as originally proposed in
the Road Department letter. Nrj Resney explained they had been discussing the
possibility of providing a 4 foot sidewalk, and would like to have a 24 foot
setback rather'than the 26 foot setback required by thts condition. However,
if' the Road Department preferred the extsting language, they would accept
Mr. Johnson advised the condition would not alter the' width of the stdewalk tn
Commissioner Beadlfng referred to Hr. Resney's request that front yard land-
scaping and Irrigation not be requtred for the larger lots, and.stated she
felt they should be requtred for all lots. Mr. Goldman requested that the
condition be rata!ned as originally wrttten.
There was no further testimony, and the hearing was closed at 7:11 p.m.
FINDZNGS AND CONCLUSZONS: Vesttng Tentative Tract Maps 23371 Amended No. 1,
23372 Amended o. Z and 23373 Amended No. I are located w~thtn Vtllage A of
the Margartta ~tllage Spectftc Plan (No. Zgg); the three tract maps wtll
provide 1763 dwelling untts and a golf course.on 254 acres; Tract 23372
Amended No. I has been condttioned wtth the spectftc plan's condition of
approval to mtttgate tmpacts to the Stephens Kangaroo Rat habttat; the tracts
have been condtttoned to comply with Spectflc Plan 199, Change of Zone Case
5Z07,'and Development Agreement No. 5; and a waiver of the lot length to width
ratio wtll be needed for Vesttrig Tentative Tract 23371 Amended No. 1. All
environmental concerns have been addressed in EIRs 107, 202, and the tntttal
54
RZVERSZDE COUNTY PLANNZNG COHHZSSZON NZNUTES OCTOBER 5, 1988
studies for these tract mps, and no significant impacts have been found; the
tract raps are consistent wtth the Comprehensive General Plan (as amended by
CGPA 150), Change of Zone Case 5107, and Specific Plan 199 Amendment No. 1;
and conform to the requirements of Ordinances 460 and 348. The proposed
project ~ll not have a significant effect on the environment.
HOT/ON: Upon morton by Commissioner Donahoe, seconded by Commissioner B~esson
and unanimously cartted, the Con~nisston adopted the negattve declarations for
EA 32546, EA 32547 and EA 32548, and approved Vesttng Tentative Tract tps
23371 Amended No. I wtth a watver of the lot length to wtdth ratto, 23372
Amended No. 1, and 23373 Amended No. 1, all subject to the proposed conditions
aeended as follows, based on the above findings and conclusions and the
reconenendations of staff.
Tract No. 23371
9 - Amend to reflect the September 30, 1988 Road Departent letter.
23(2) and 23(3) - Amend to require the developer to comply with the parkway
landscaping requirements as shown tn Spectftc Plan No. 199
Amended No. I unless maintenance ts provided by a
honeowners association or other publlc enttty.
2E - Delete the last sentence ("The final map for Vesttng Tract 23371 shall
show the park as a numbered'lot").
33(c) - Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the
subdivision,-except for the clubhouse whtch my have.screened
equipment as approved by the Planning Department; however, solar
equipment or any other energy saving devtces shall be permitted with
Planning Department approval.
Condition 34(a) for Tracts 23371, 23372, and 33(a) for Tract 23373
Add "and my be phased wtth the project". (to clarify that walls my be
phased'with the development of the tract.
Condition 33(d) for'Tracts 23371 and 23372, and 32(d) for Tract 23373
Building separation between a11 buiidings Including fi. replaces shall not be
less than ten feet unless approved by the Department of Building and Safety
and the Fire Department per Spectfic Plan 199 Amended No. Z,
34(e) for Tracts 23371, 23372 and 33(e) for Tract 23373 - Delete
Road Department Condition 21 for Tract 23371 and 14 for Tracts 23372 and 23373
Add to the end 'or as approved by the Road Department'
-- 55
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COI~ISSZON HINUTES SEPTEHBER 28, 1988
(AGENDA ZTEH 1-2 - REEL 1002 - SIDE I - TAPE I SIDE 1)
TRACT NAP 23100 MIENDE]) NO. I - EA 32318 -'94ar}borough Dev. Corp. - Rancho
California/Skinner Lake Area -Ftrst and Third Supervtsortal DIstricts - west
of Butterfield Stage lid, north of Rancho California lid - 291 lots - 122.5~
acres - R-1/SP Zones. Schedule A
TRACT HAP 23101 - EA 32533 - Harlborough Dev. Corp. - Pancho
California/Skinner Lake Area -Ftrst and Thtrd Supervtsortal D~:strtcts - east
of Katser PiNy, west of Butterfield Stage lid - 263 lots - 87~ acres -
SP/R-2-6000 Zones. Schedule A
TRACT HAP 23102 - EA 32534 - ~rlborough Dev. Corp. - Rancho
California/Skinner Lake Are -Ftrst and Thtrd Supervtsortal DIstricts - north
of La Serena Nay, west of Butterfield Stage Rd - 37 lots - 16.4~ acres -
SP/R-1, Zones. Schedule A
TRACT HAP 23103 MIENDED NO. 1 - EA 32535 - Harlborough Dev. Corp. - Rancho
California/Skinner Lake Are -Ftrst and Thtrd Supervtsorta] Dtstrlcts - west
of Butterfield Stage lid, north of Rancho California lid -18 lots - 29~ acres -
SP/R-A-1 Zones. Schedule A
The hearings were opened at 9:49 a.m. and closed atIO:08 a.m.
.STAFF RECONNENDATION: Adoptton of the negative declarations for EA 32318,
32533, 32534. and 32535, and approval of Tentative Tract Naps 23100 Amended
No. 1, 23101, 23102, and 23103 Amended No. 1 with a waiver of the lot length
to width ratio, subject to the proposed conditions. The subject tract maps
were located vrithtn Vtllage B of the Nargartta V~llage Specific Plan, and
would divide the 254 acres tnto 605 residential lots. Staff had found the
tract maps to be consistent with the Comprehens(ve General Plan, Specific Plan
199 Amendment No. 1, and the zoning which had been applted to the specific
plan through Change of Zone Case 5107. Ns. Gtfford recommended several
changes to the conditions for these tract maps, relating to requirements for
maintenance of the open space areas, park requirements, useable yard areas,
and fencing requirements. fir. Klotz suggested modffytng. the last condition
for each tract map by beginning with the phrase "Development of the".
Commissioner Bresson requested that changes be made throughout to refer to
either "public use tratls" or "recreational tratls' tnstead of "equestrian
trails"; he felt these terms would more accurately describe their use.
Batty Burnell, representing the applicant, accepted the conditions as
amended. It was hts understanding that tn the event any portion of the
development agreement was held to be tnval~d (for any reason), the conditions
requiring compliance ~th that agreement would be null and void; thts was
confirmed by County Counsel.
There was no further testimony, and the hearings were closed at 10:08 a.m.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Tentative Tract Naps 23100 Amended No. 1, 23101'
23102, and 23103 Amended No. 1 are located vrithtn Village B of the Nargartta
2
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 28, 1988
Village Specific Plan; the four tract maps would divide the 254 acres into 605
residential lots; the tract maps have been condtttoned tn accordance with the
specific plan's conditions of approval to mitigate impacts on the Stephens
Kangaroo Rat; the ·tract raps have been condittoned to comply with Specific
Plan 199 Amendment No. 1, Change of Zone Case 5107, and Development Agreement
No. 5; a waiver for the lot 'length to width ratio wtll be needed for Tract
23103 Amended No. 1. All environmental concerns have been addressed in
107, EIR 202, and the tntttal studies for these tract mps, and no significant
impacts have been found; the tract maps are consistent with the Comprehensive
General .Plan (as ended by General Plan Amendment No. 150), Specific Plan 199
Amendment No, % and Change of Zone Case 5107; the tract maps conform to the
requirements of Ordinances 348 and 460. The proposed pro;jects will not have a
significant effect on the environment.
,MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Bresson, secondedby Commissioner
Beadling and unanimously carried, the Commission adopted the negative
declarations for EA 32318, EA 32533, EA 32534 and EA 32535, and approved
Tentative Tract Maps 23100 Amended No. 1, 23101, 23102, and 23103 Amended
No. 1 with a waiver of the lot length to width ratio, subject to the proposed
conditions, amended as follows, based on the above findings and conclusions
and the recommendations of staff.
Tract Map 23100 Amended No, I
22.
23.
Amend to conform to Condition 24 (to provide for mtntenance of the
common open space area by either a County Service Area or a *Homeowners
Association),
Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits for 160 units on Tract
23100, the park area'shall be developed per Specific Plan No. Amended
No. 1.
24.
Replace with the standard alternative condition providing for
maintenance of the common open space area by either a County Service
Area or Homeowners Association.
37(b) Wall and/or fence locations shall substantially'conform'to attached
Figure III-28 of Specific Plan No. 199 Amendment No. 1.
38.
The development of Tentative Tract No. 23100 Amended No. I shall
comply with all provisions of Specific Plan No. 199 Amendment No. 1 and
Development Agreement No. 5
Tract Map 23101
17(h) Rear yards and useable side yards shall have an average fiat area of
2000 square feet.
22.
Amend to confom to Condition 24 (to provide for maintenance of the
common open space area by either a County Service Area or a Homeowners
Association).
3
R/VERSZDE COUNTY PLANNZNG CONHZSSZON NZNUTES SEPTEHBER 28, 1988
3e
Prtor to the tssuance of occupancy pamtts for 160 untts on Tract
23101, the park area shall be developed par Spactftc Plan No. Amended
No. 1.
24. Replace ~th the standard a]ternative condition proVIding for
maintenance of the. cu,,~n opan space area by either a County Service
Area or Homeowners Association.
37(b) Nall and/or fence locations shall substantially confom to attached
Figure 111-28 of Spactfic Plan No. 199 Amendment No. Z.
38. The development of Tentative Tract No. 23101 shall
~greement No. 5 . opment
Tract HaD 23%02
Amend to conform vrith Condition 33(to provtde for metntenance of the
common opan space area by etther a County Service Area or a Homeowners
Association.
33. -Replace with the standard alternative condition providing for
maintenance of the common open space area by either a County Service
Area or Homeowners Association.
35(b) Wall and/or fence locations shall substantially conform to attached
Figure III-2B of Specific Plan No. 199 Amendment No. 1.
36. The development of Tentative Tract No. 23102 shall comply with all
provisions of Specific Plan No. 199 Amendment No. I and Development
Agreement No. 5
Tract liap 23103 Amended No. I
21. Amend to conform to Condition 22 (to provide for maintenance of the
commonopan space area by either a County Service' Area or a Homeowners
Association.
2e
Replace with the standard alternative condition providing for
maintenance of the common open space area by+either-a County Service
Area or Homeowners Association.
34(a) Wall and/or fence locations shall substantially confom to attached
Figure III-28 of Spactftc Plan No. 199 Amendment No. 1.
35. The development of Tentative Tract No. 23103 Amended No. I shall
comply with all provisions of Spacific Plan No. 199 Amendment No. I and
Development Agreement No. 5
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COHHISSION MINUTES SEPTEHBER 28, 1988
(AGENDA ITEMS 1-3 AND 1-4 - REEL 1002, SIDE 1 - TAPE 1, SIDE 1)
TRACT NAP 22916 - EA 32505 - Rancho California Dev. Co. - Rancho California
Area -Ftrst Supervtsortal District - north of Pauba lid, west of Butterfield
Stage lid - 259 lots - 103.3~ acres - R-R/SP Zones. Schedule A
TRACT HAP 22915 - EA 32504 - Rancho California Dev, CO. - Pancho California
Area -Ftrst Supervtsortal Dtstrtct- south of Rancho Vista lid, west of
Butterfield Stage Rd - 287 lots - 91.6~ acres - R-R/SP Zones. 'Schedule A
VESTING TRACT HAP 23471 - EA 32518 -Katser Development Co. - Rancho
California Area -Ftrst Supervtsortal Dtstrtct- south of Rancho California
Rd, west of Katser Pkwy - 155 lots - 44~ acres - R-1/SP Zones. Schedule A
VESTING TRACT HAP 23470 - EA 32517 - Kaiser Development Co. - Rancho
California 'Area - First Supervtsortal District - north of Rancho Vista Rd,
west of Kaiser Pkwy - 325 lots - 106.3 acres - R-lISP Schedule A
The hearings were opened at 10:10 a.m. and closed at 11:10 a.m.
STAFF.RECOMHENDATION: Adoption of the negative declarations for EA 32517, EA
32518, EA 32504, and EA 32505 and approval of Tentative Tract Maps 22915 and
22916, and Vesttrig Tentative Tract Maps 23470 and 23471 subject to the
proposed conditions, and a waiver of the lot length to width 'ratio for
four tract maps. These four tract maps were located in Vtllage C of Specific
Plan 199 Amendment No. 1, and would divide the 345 acres into 1020 residential
lots, provide a 10 acre school.s*tte, a 5 acre park stte and 3 tot lots. Staff
had found the proposed maps to be consistent with the Comprehensive General
Plan, the adopted specific plan, and the zoning which had been applied to the
property through Chan<]e of Zone Case 5107. Hs. Gtfford recommended several
changes to the condit:lons of approval; these changes related to the minimum
lot size, lot length to width ratio requirements, park requirements,
landscaping/irrigation requirements, and a requirement for development of the
tract maps in accordance with the adopted specific plan and approved
development agreement.
Commissioner Beadltng questioned Ms. Gtfford's recommendation for deleUon of
the conditions for Tract Maps 23470, 22915 and 22916 requiring landscaping and
irrigation. Hs. Gifford expiained*these three tentative maps proposed minimum
7200 square foot lots and the County did not normally require landscaping and
irrigation for lots of this size. Hr. Streeter felt this condition could be
retained, as tt was County policy to require landscaping and irrigation for
7200 square foot lots tn the Rancho California area.
Robert Kimble, representing the applicant, advised they would prefer not to
provide the front yard landscaping and irrigation, and requested that the
condition be deleted. Commissioner Beadling asked whether Mr. Ktmble had seen
the letter submitted by ~. and Hrs. Pipher objecting to the density proposed
in the area adjacent to-their estate type homes. At her request, Mr. Ktmble
located Mr. Pipher's subdivision which was next to Rancho Vista Road. They
h
were proposing the 7200 square foot lots allowed by the specific plan for t is
area. Hs. Gifford advised the tract map was a reftling of a previously
RZVERSZDE COUNTY PLANNZNG COFIHZSS~ION HZNUTES SEPTEHBER 28, 1988
approved map, and there was no change in the denstry; the proposed tract map
was within the density range allowed by the specific plan. Commissioner
Beadltng quoted from the letter, which requested that the density be reduced
to the denstry 'originally proposed by the specific plan. She wanted to know
what thts density was, and was tnformed there had been no change in the
density.
Hr. Kimble requested that Condition 4 of the Flood Contrel Dtstrtct's letter
for Tract 23471 be deleted. This condition required maintenance ramps in the
Long Canyon Channel; these ramps were not needed because the had dest ned
this channel for thetr underlying map wtt 4:1 slopes. Fir. ]~otz agre~]3 to the
h
deletion of this condition. Hr. Ktmble then requested that Road Department
Condition 25 for Tract 22915 and Condition' 28 for Tract 22916 be amended by
adding to the end 'or as approved by the Road Commissioner'; Hr. ~lohnson
agreed to thts change for both tract maps.
Condition 20 for Tract 22916 required the park to be fully improved and
developed prior to the issuance of building permits for 150 units, and
Kimble requested that this condition be amended to require the V~rk prior to
the issuance of occupancy for the 259th lot. Providing the ful improved
park prior to 150 units would be a burden to the developer. Hs. Gtfford
advised Hr. Kimble's request would delay completion of the park until after
the entire tract had been completed; staff felt 150 units would afford the
applicant an opportunity to build some units, and at that point the Improve-
ments could he tied into road improvements. The park would also be useful for
the tract to the north, which was being developed by the same developer.
Mr. Kimble requested clarification of the new condition staff had suggested
for Tract 22916 regarding mitigation for the Stephens Kangaroo Rat. Fir.
Goldman explained this condition referred back to the specific plan condi-
· tions, which required either a Hemorandum of Understanding with the Department
of Fish and Game or that the applicant comply with the Countywide program
being established by Riverside County.
Robert Dudonay, also representing the applicant, advised he was acttvely
involved with the task force appointed by the Board of Supervisors regarding
the Stephens Kangaroo Rat program. There was no set pro ram at the present
time, and he wanted to know whether they would be charg~ the $750 per lot
fee, or whether they would be held Up untt1 a spectftc program was estab-
lished. He did not want to be 'dela ed, as they would he read to pull build-
ing permtts withtn the next few wa~s. Mr. ICIotz explained ~e Board had
generally endorsed the concept of having a developer make a deposit of $750
per lot, accompanied by an agreement to pay the fee as ultimately adopted;
this would allow the project to go forward. He felt thts option would be
available to the developer. He explained this was not necessarily 'the
ultimate fee, but was on1 a securtty to be deposited a~tatnst the ulttmate
mitigation fee. This exp{anation satisfied Fir. Oudonay s concerns.
Mr. Kimble advtsed tt 'was their understanding that tn the event Development
Agreement No. 5 should-be held tnvaltd at some ttme .in the future, the
approval of the four tract maps would st111 stand, but the condition for
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING CONMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 28, 1988
compliance with the development a reamant would be null and void. Nr. Klotz
advised this was explicitly provt)ed within the development agreement.
OPPONENTS: ·
Bob Pipher, 41825 Greentree Road, Temecula, advised the development in Which
he lived (knom as Green Tree) contained approxt~.tely 96 acres and he and his
wife owned approximately one-third of this property. They had submitted the
letter requesting that the portions of the .subject tract maps adjacent to
their area be required to create lots similar t'n size. Hr. Pipher had a map
of the Nargartta Village Specific Plan dated Hatch 30, 1986, which showed the
density in this area to be approximately half of the density currently
proposed. Fir. Pipher advised this was an equestrian area, and people residing
in 'the area needed riding trails. He requested a connecting trail from Pauba
to Rancho Vista along the boundary between their subdivision and the subject
development or along Kaiser Parkway; this would provide an additional
1 andscaped buffer area,
Hr. Pipher advised they had no problem with the proposed school site, but felt
the circulation system proposed to serve the school was inadequate. In his
opinion, Street "B" should be extended to Kaiser Parkway; 'this would then
tprovtde access to both the school site and the park from Kaiser Parkway. At'
he present time there was a steady flow of traffic, and providing an access
to the park site and school from Kaiser Parkway would help everyone in the
area, in addition to making the park more accessible. Because of the traffic
on Kaiser Parkway, Nr. Pipher thought it would be difficult for people living
on the other side to reach the park. He therefore suggested that one or two
parks be required on the other side of Kaiser Parkway, to benefit residents in
that area.
Mr. Pipher requested a solid wall along the boundary between their development
and the subject project. The people residing in this area were requesting a
buffer,' and would appreciate anything the Commissioners could do to help
there was no street between the area he was representing and u ite;
the lots from the subject tract map were backing up against the.lots in his
subdivision.
When Mr. Pipher again requested equestrian trails, Ms. Gifford briefly
reviewed the.proposed trail system, which included a trail along Rancho
California Road, going up h Kaiser Parkway and 1~40 easement; no trails were
te
proposed in the southern area as requested by Mr. Pipher. Commissioner
Bresson requested that these trails be designated as public access or
recreational trails instead of equestrian trails. Mr. Burnell advised that an
equestrian trail had been established all along Pauba Road; going east and
west, and there was a north/south trail in the Metropolitan Water District
easement going by the school administration site, along Rancho California Road
to Kaiser Parkway. The residents of the Green Tree area could use the trail
along Pauba, which connected to the trail alon Green Tree Lane. Thi was a
regional trail system, established under the d~rection of the Parks s
Department.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING CO~IISSION HINUTES SEPTE~IBER 28, .1988
Commissioner B~esson requested Information on the type of buffer to be
provided. fir. Burnell advtsed there ~ould be masonry walls tn the are north
and south of Rancho Vtsta Road; he thought thts ~ould sattsfy Hr. Ptpher's
concerns. Hr. Burnell advtsed the Hargartta Vtllage Spectftc Plan had
originally been approved wtth a sltghtly htgher denstry tn thts area. They
had added land wtth the ended spectftc plan but had not changed densities tn
the area of the sub4ect tract maps. The exhtbtt presented byHr. Ptpher ~as a
conceptual exhtbtt prepared by the engtneer for tnternal use only and had
never been presented to the County.
Nr. Kimble responded to FV. Ptpher's request for an additional park on the
other stde of Katser Parkway, by advtstng Costatn Homes was providing a park
planned for Tract 22715 to the north; they ware planning to upgrade both parks
over and above the. requirements of the spectftc plan.
Commissioner Donahoe asked ~hether staff was recommending that a condition be
added to requtre the wa13 as a buffer between the subject tract maps and the
area represented by Hr. Pipher, and was tnfomed thts was a condition of the
specfftc plan.
Lee Johnson referred to Hr. Ptpher's aug eatton that 'B" Street be extended to
Kaiser Parkway, and advised both he and ~hn
Johnson
(Transportation Planning
Sectton of the Road Department) felt thts was an excellent recommendation.
Circulation. in thts area mtght be tmproved by making this connection rather
than having the school served by a cu~-de-sac street. This ~ou~d also give
both the school and the park stte access from a 66 foot wide street. Nhen
Commissioner Bresson asked whether thts could be accomplished ~thout
redesigntng the map, Mr. Johnson replted he.fe~t the map Wou~d have to be
amended. Mr. Streeter fe3t this provide a much better access.
Commi. ssioner Beadling felt that a long cul-de-sac street gotng tnto a school
was poor planning, as tt required the cars and school busses brtngtng
children to ~rap around and.come back out the same way. Extending the street
would allow the vehtcles to drop off the children and go.out a different
Commissioner Bresson was concerned about creattng a 4-way Intersection, and
Mr. Johnson agreed that a 3-way intersection created less problems. However,'
he still felt that providing access to Katser Parkway would result tn better
circulation service to the school stte.
Hr. Burnell dtd not feel It was necessary to extend "B" Street to Kaiser Park-
way in order to provtde adequate circulation for the school. He was concerned
that the change tn the roadway might cause problems vrith regard to the sewer
lines. Mr. Burnell was also concerned about a 4-way Intersection at Katser
Parkway; he felt retaining the extsttng 3-way Intersection Nould provtde an
overall better circulation system for residents of the area. Commissioner
Bresson preferred the cul-de-sac street because tt 1
wou d not encourage through
traffic along the school stte. Mr. Johnson pointed out that there Would be
less opportunity to eventually obtain stgnaltzatton for a 3-way intersection
than for a 4-way Intersection.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COWINISSION HINUTES SEPTE~IBER 28, 1988
Nr. Ktmble advised they had met with the school dtstrict and showed them the
tentative map; they ere pleased with the confi uratton of the school stte as
well as the proposed street system. lit. Burnel~ advised their ortgtnal design
showed the school/park stte adjacent Katser Parkway, and the school distrtct
had objected to this plan because they did not want the chtldren adjacent to a
major street. Commissioner Bresson supported the tract map as currently
designed, as tt was satisfactory to the school district.
There was no further testimony, and the hearing was closed at 11:10 a.m,
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Tentative Tract Naps 22915, and 22916, and Vesting
Tract Naps 23470 and 23471 are located wtthtn Village C of Specific Plan 199
Amendment No. 1 (the Nargartta Village Specific Plan); the four tract maps
would divide the 345 acres into 1020 restdenUal lots; design manuals have
been prepared'for Vesting Tentative Tract Naps 23470 and 23471; the tract maps
have been conditioned to comply with Spectftc Plan 199 Amendment No. 1, Change
of Zone Case 5107, and Development Agreement No. 5; a waiver for the lot
length to width ratio will be needed for all four maps. All environmental
concerns have been addressed in EIR 107, EZR 202, and the initial studies for.
these tract maps, and no significant impacts ware found; the tract maps are
consistent with the Comprehensive General Plan (as meended by General Plan
Amendment 150), Specific Plan 199 ~nendment No. I and Change of Zone Case
5107; and co form to the requirements of Ordinances 348 and 460. n
'HOTION: Upon motion b Commissioner Bresson, seconded by Commissioner
Beadling and unanimously carried, the Commission adopted the negative
declarations for EA 32517, EA 32518, EA 32504 and EA 32505, and approved
Tentative Tract Naps 22915 and 22916, and Vesting Tract Naps 32470 and 23471,
all with a waiver of the lot length to width ratio, subject to the proposed
conditions and based on the above findings and conclusions and the recommenda-
tions of staff.
Tract No, 23470
17(a) - All lots shall have. a minimum size of 7200 square feet net.
17(b) - Delete entirely
20 - Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits for 150 units, one tot lot
shall be improved and fully developed.
21 - Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits for 275.units, the second
tot lot shall be improved and fully developed.
27 - Prior to the issuance of building porm~ts (balance to remain the same)
36 - The development of Vestin Tentative Tract Nap 23470 shall comply with
its Design Iqanual, with atl provisions of Spectftc Plan No. 199
Amendment No. 1 and with Development Agreement No. 5
Tract No. 23471
9
RZVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING CO~ISSION MINUTES SEPTEHBER 28, 1988
20 - Prior to the issuance of occupancy permtts for 200 untts, one tot lot
shall be traproved and fully developed,
26 - Prior to the tssuance of butldtng permtts (balance .to rematn the .same)
32(f) - All 'front yards-shall be provtded with landscaping and manually
operated, permanent underground irrigation.
Flood Control Condition 4 - Delete enttrely
35 - The development of Vesting Tentative Tract Hap 23471 shall comply with
tts Destgn Hanual, with all provisions of Spectftc Plan No, 199
Amendment No. 1 and with Development Agreement No, 5
Delete Condition 4 of the flood Control letter dated June 17, 1988,
Tract No, 22915
24 - Prior to the tssuance of butlding penntts (balance to rematn the same)
32 - The development of Tentative Tract Nap 22915 shall comply with all
provisions of Spectftc Plan No. 199 Amendment No. I and Development
Agreement No. 5
Road Department Condition 26 - Add to the end "or as approved by the Road
Comtsstoner",
Tract No. 22916
2 -Add the following: except for the lot length to width ratio.
20 - Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits for 150 units in Tentative
Tract 22916, the park shall be fully improved and developed.
25- Prior to the issuance of.building permits (balance to remain the same)
32 - The development of Tentative Tract I tap 23916 shall comply with all
provisions of Specific Plan No. 199 Amendment No. I and Development
Agreement N~. 5
33 - Prior to issuance of grading permits, impacts to the Stephens Kangaroo
Rat Habttat shall be mitigated per the spectftc plan conditions of
approval.
Road Department Condition 28 - Add to the end "or as approved by the Road
Commissioner".
Zoning Area: Rencho California
Supervisorial District: First and Third
EA NO.: 32318, 32533, 32534, 32535
Specific Plan Section
Tract Nos.: 23100 Amendment No.
23101, 23102
23103 Amendment rio.
Planning Commission: 9-28-88
Agenda item No.: 1-2
D::] 8e
o
1. Appl t cant:
2. Engineer:
3. Type of Request:
Location:
E~ist~ng Zoning:
Surrounding Zoning:
Site Characteristics:
Area Cha tact, r~ st~ cs:
CompPehensive General
Plan Designation:
Land Division Data:
Tract Acreage
23100/~!. I 1~23
23101 87
23102 16
23103 ~nd. 1 29
Total 254
Narlborough Davelolment Corp.
Commntty Engineering Services, Inc.
The four tracts rlll sulxltvtde 254 acres into 605
residential lots and 18 open space lots.
14est of Butterfield Stage Road, north of Rancho
California Road and east of Kaiser Parkway.
R-R (Change' of Zone 5107 heard by the Board of
Supervisors on 9-13-88 proposes Spedf~c Plan 199
Amendment No. 1 zoning).
To the west and south the tracts adjoin other
portions of Spectftc Plan 199. To the east and
north, the zoning is A-1-10, AP2-20 and R-T. The
N-A-P property located ~n the southwest corner of
h
t e tracts ~s zoned R-1.
Vacant land traversed kith low h~11s.
Located on eastern edge of Rancho California
coneunity. Agricultural and rural land uses are
located east of Butterfield Stage Road.
Not designated as Open Space and Rancho Villages
(General Plan Amendment No. 150 proposes a general
plan designation of Specific Plan 199, Amendment
No. 1).
Res4dentt~l Lots
Open Space Lots
Density
287 5 2.4
263 8 3.0
37 5 2.3
18 ' .6
Staff ROpo~
Tract Nos. 23100 Amended No. 1
23101, 23102
23103 keendad No. 1
Page 2
11, Agency Reconnendattons: be letters dated:
Tract 23100 kud. 1 23101
23102 23103 ~d. 1
Road: 7-25-88 7-22-88
Health: 4-19-88 4-19-88
Irl ood: 6-17-88 6-17-88
Ft re: 6-14-88 6-15-88
ENHD 4-15-88 4-15-88
Rancho Hater Dt st. 6-20-88 6-16-88
Ca1 trans 3-30-88
Sheriff 4- 5-88 4- 4-88
7-22-88 -7-22-88
4-19-88 6-23-88
6-17-88 6-17-88
5- 3-88 4-28-88
4-19-88 4-15-88
4-15-88 6-16-88
3-30-88
4-5-88 4- 5-88
12..Le tters:
Opposing/supporting: None recetved as of this
writing.
13. Sphere of Influence: Not kith~n a Ctty Sphere.
ANALYSZS:.
Tract Nos: 23100 Anended No. 1, 23101, 23102 and 23103 knended No. I ~m lament
Village .B of the Nargartta Vtllage Spectfic Plan (SP 199 Amendment ~o. 1).
Spedf~c Plan No. 199 Amendment .NO, 1, Change of Zone No. 5107, General Plan
Amendment No. 150 and Developuent Agreement No. 5 were heard by the Board of
Supervisors on September 13, 1988. These tracts have been designed to be
consistent kith these documents.
The table below sunnertze the tracts' relationship and consistency kith the
Specific Plan's planntnQ areas. As shown, none of the tracts exceed the
permitted number of residential units.
CO~oA~ISO8 OF TBACT mE SPECIFIC ~ ~LI~ UNITS
Tract No. Proposed Spoctftc Plan Permitted
No. of Untts Area No. of Units
23100 And. 1 287 8, 10-12 291
23101 263 4, 6 263
23102 37 2, 3 37
23103 And. I 18 7, 9 19 *
605 610
Staff Report
Tract NOs. 23100 Mended NO. 1
23101, 23102
23103 Mended NO. 1
Page 3
Tract 23100 Mended No. I proposes a ,tintmum 7200 square feet lot size and the
deve]opment of the southern portton of PTanntng Area 5, the propose park. The
tract bes ken condlttoned to comply wtth the Stephens Kangaroo rat mitigation
tncluded tn Spectftc PTan No. 199.
In conformance r]th the spectfic p]an'S conditions of approval, prior to
tssuance of grading permtts for 160 untts on Tracts 23100 and 23101, the park
sha11 be developed to assure compatibility tn gradtrig and to met neighborhood
.racreattonal needs. A lot line adjustment wtth the Rancho California ~ter
District is also requ~fed prior to recordation of the final map.
Tract No. 23101 proposes a erintmum lot stze of 6000 square feet but ensures a
usable rear yard area per* the spectftc plan conditions of approval. Tract
23101 w*~11 also comply wtth the speciftc plan's conditions of approval to
mitigate Stephen's Kangaroo Rat tmpacts.
Tract 'No. 23102 proposes a minimum 7200 square foot lot stze. Tract 23103
Mended No. I proposes one acre minimum lot sizes along Butterfield Stage Road
so as to provide a buffer and transition to ~neries located *to the east. The
applicant ~s requesting a waiver to the County's required length to w~dth ratio
for lot 18 due to the difficult configuration of this parcel of land and
restricted access on Butterf~eld Stage Road.
All four tracts have been cond]ttoned to mitigate ~mpacts to the Mr. Palmr
Observatory, school ~mpacts, as well as comply ~th acoustical reports and the
adopted specific plan and development agreement requirements,
Environmental Assessments have been prepared on all four tracts. Environmental
~mpacts wen assessed ~n EIR 107 and EIR 202 prepared for the Rancho V~11age
Specific Plan and. the Hargartta Village Spedfic Plan. Additional
environmental evaluation has been provtded by the reports prepared for the
specific plan amendment and the acoustical studies prepared for three tracts.
No s~gnificant environmental impacts have been found.
FINDINGS:
e
Tentative Tract No.s 23100 Mended No. 1, 23101, 23102, and 23103 Mended
No. :I are located tn Vtllage B of the !qargartta Village Spodfic Plan.
The four tracts wtll divide 254 acres tnto 605 residential lots.
The tracts have been condittoned per the Specific Plan's condition of
approval to mitigate impacts to the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat.
Staff Report
Tract Nos. 23100 Mended No. 1
23101, 23102
23103/mended No. 1
Page 4
' 4e
e
The tracts have been condtttoned to comply. ~th Spectftc Plan 199, Change
of Zone No. SZ07 end I)evelopment 'Agreement No. 5.
A Matvet for length to width ratio.will be needed for Tract 23103/mended
No. 1.
All environmental concerns have been addressed tn EZRs 107, 202 and the
lntttal studtes for these tracts and no significant lapacts have been
found.
2. The tracts' are conslstent. wtth General Plan/mendment No. 150,
Zone No. 5107, Speclflc Plan No. 199, Amendment No. 1.
3. The* tracts conform to the requlrements of Ordinances 348 and 460.
Change of
RECO!~ENDATIORS
.ADOPtiON of a Ne attve Declaration for EA Nos. 32318, 32533, 32534, 32535 based
on a ttndtng. ~hat the project w111 not have a significant effect on the
envtroment.
APPROVAL of Tentative Tract Nos. 23100 Amended No. 1, 23101, 23102, and 23103
~nenned No. 1 subject to the attached conditions of approve].
.KG :rap
RZVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTtENT
SUBDzVZSTON
CONDZTIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTAT/RE TRACT NO. 23103
DATE: 9-28-88
A~ENDED NO. 1
STANDARD CONDZTiONS
S,
k- 3.
$_
0
The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold hamless the County of
Riverside, its agents, officers, and emplo3mes free anY claim, action, or
proceeding against the County of RIverside or tts agents, officers, or
enployees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the County
of Riverside, its advtso agencies, appeal boards or legislative body
concerning Tentative Tract 2r~103,/mended No. 1, which action ts brought
about wtthtn the tie period provided for in california Government Code
Section 66499.37. The County of Riverside wtll promptly notify the
subdivider of any such clatm, action, or proceeding against the County of
Riverside and wtll cooperate fully tn the defense. if the County fails to
promptly nottry the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or
·fatls to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the
County of Riverside.
The tentative subdivision'shall comply .with the State of california
SubdiVIsion Hap Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule
B, unless modified by the condttlons 11sted below.
This condtttonally approved tentative map wtll exptre two years after the
County of Riverside Board of Supervisors approval.date, unless extended as
provided by Ordinance 460.
The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all
the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Hap Act and
Ordinance 460.
The subdivider shall submlt one copy of a soils report to' the Riverside
County Surveyor's Office and two copies to the Department of Building and
t
Safety. The report shall address. the so ls stability and geological
conditions of the stte.
If any grading is proposed, the subdivider shall submit one print of
comprehensive grading plan to the Department of Building and Safety. The
lan shall c ly with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended
Cy Ordinance 4c~7 and as maybe additionally provided for in these
conditions of approval.
Conditions of Approval
Tentat(re Tract No. 23~03, ~mended No. 2'
Page 2
7. A gradtng pentit shall be obtatned from the Department of Butldtng and
f
Sa ety prtor to cormeric,merit of any gradtrig outstale of county maintained
road rlght of way,
8. Any delinquent property taxes shall be patd prtor to recordatton of the
ftnml rap.
The sulxlhtder abel1 comply ~lth the street Improvement recomendattons
outltned tn the RIverside County bad Department's letter dated 7-22-88 a
copy of Nhtch ~s attached.
10. Legal access us ~equtred by Ordinance 460 shall be p~ovtded from the tract
map bounda~ to a County mtntatned road.
All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the publlc and shall
conttnue tn force unttl the governing body accepts or abandons such
offers. All dedications abel1 be free from all encumbrances as approved
b 'the bad CommiSsioner. Street names shall be sub:iect to approval of
~e Road Commissioner.
Easements, when requtred for roadway slopes, dratnage facilities,
utilities, etc., shall be shown on the ftnal map tf they are located
wtthtn the 3and dtvtston boundary. A11 offers of dedication and
conveyances shall be submitted and recordled as dtrected by the County
Surveyor.
Hater and sewerage .disposal facilities shall be Installed tn accordance
wtth the provisions set forth tn the Rherstde County Health Department's
letter dated 6-23-88 a copy of whtch ts attached,
The. subdivider shall comply wtth the .flood control recommendations
ou~ltned by the RIverside County Flood Control Dtstrlct's letter dated
6-}7-86 9-27-88 a copy of whtch ts attached, If the land dtvtston lies'
wtthtn an adopted flood control dretnage area pursuant to Sectton 10,25 of
Ordinance 460, appro rtate fees for the construction of area dratnage
facfllttes shall be collected by the Road Commissioner, (Amended by
Planntng Commission 9-28-88)
15, The subdivider shall comply wtth the ftre Improvement recommendations
outltned in the County Ftre Narshal's letter dated 9-29-88 a copy'of whtch
ts attached.
16. Subdivision phastng, Including any proposed common open space area
Improvement phastn , tf applicable, shall be sub3ect to Planning
Department approvaY. Any proposed phastng shall provide for adequate
vehicular access to all lots tn each phase, and shall substantially
conform to the tntent and purpose of the subdivision approval.
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Tract No. 23Z03, Amended No. 2
Page 3
17. Lots c~eated by thts subdivision shall comply k'lth the following:
a An lots shah have a .dntmmn stze of 2 acre grass.
b. All lot length to v~tdth rettos shall be tn conromance ~th Sectton
3.8C of Ordinance 460.
c. Corner lots and through lots, tf any, shall be provtded with
additional area pursuant to Sectton 3.88 of Ordinance 460 and so as
not to contatn less net area than the least amount of net area tn
non-corner and through' lots.
d. Lots created- by thts subdhtston shall be tn conromance vtth the
development standards of the Spectftc Plan No. 299 Amendment No. 2
zone.
e. When lots are crossed by mJor publlc uttllty easements, each lot
shall have a net usable area of not less than 3,600 square feet,
exclusive of the utility easement.
f. Graded but undeveloped land shall be mtntatned tn a reed-free
condtt(on and shall be etther planted wtth tntertm landscaping or
provtded ,tth other- eroston 'control measures as approved by the
Dtrector of Butldtng and Safety.
g. Trash btns, loadtrig areas and 'Incidental storage areas shall be
located away and vtsually screened from surrounding areas wtth the use
of block walls and landscaping.
]8. Prlor to RECORDATZON of the ftnal map the following conditions shall be
satfsfted:' '
Prtor to.the recordatton of the ftnal map the applicant shall submtt
vrttten clearances to the Rherstde County Road and Survey Department
that all pertinent requirements outltned tn the attached approval
letters from the folioling agenctes have been met.
County Ftre Department
County Flood Control
County Parks Department
Rancho iter 0t strtct
County Health Departmeht
County Planntng Department
Eastern !~ntctpal Water Dtst.
b. Prtor to the recordatton of the. ftnal map, General Plan Amendment No.
250, Spectftc Plan No. 299, Amendment No. 2, Development Agreement No.
5, and Change of Zone No. 5Z07 shall be approved by the Board of
Supervisors and shall be effective. Lots created by thts land
Conditions of Approval
TentatJve Tract No. 23Z03, Mended No.
Page 4
dJvJston shall be tn conformnce krlth the develolaent standards of the
zone ultimately applied to the property.
19. All ex?st?ng structures on the subject property abel1 be removed prior to
recordatlon of the final map.
20. lapacts to the .Temecula Elementar~ and Elstnore Unton Htgh School Dtstrtct
shall be edttgated at the development application stage tn accordance vtth
the dt sir1 ct pol t ct es.
21. The common open space area shall be shine as a numbered lot on the final
map and shall be ranaged by a roster proper'q mrs association or CSA.
(Amended by Planntng Commission 9-28-88)
~t~<!oetHefrL~t+H~Jae~-L~'Vn~ 'I-Tr--'L~Ta~- d~.., b..,tL-qrr~
-ehe-~-~--Id~-~-~l~. ~ed by Planning Commission
9-28-88)
~:~-J, 4~et,14ri~ti~if-~,o~na~t~qion~ti~lan~a~t~k~t-+en~,W- (Amended
by Planntng Commission 9-28-88)
an~-~czC~c.t-kH~-J~- tn~,~atc~ijherti~j- k cfanc~c. (Amended by
Planntng Ceamission 9-28-88)
4~e-4~iewiN~tN~wielee-.heqq-apply; (Amended by Planntng Comisston
9-28-88)
414~er&44e-er-4;ke-;eenty's ecceHer-4~--ti,Ceresi~ (Amended by Planntng
Cornrot sst on 9-28-88)
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Tract No. 23103, Amended No. 1
Page 4
dtv~ston shall be tn conformnce ~th the development standards of the
zone ulttmtely applled to the proparty,
Z9. All extsttng structures on the subject property abel1 be removed prior to
reco~iatton of the final rap.
Impacts to the Temecula Elementary and Elstnoro Unton Htgh $chool District
shall be mitigated at the development application stage in accordance with
the dtstrtct policies.
21, The common open .space area shall be shown as a numbered lot on the final
mp and shall be ranaged by a roster property owners association or CSA.
{Amended by Planntng Comrlsston 9-28-88)
9'28-88)
l,~_J~hGlaratio~4f-4ovena~t~-r4on~tt,$onean~-~6~t~$et-$onel-~m~- (Mended
by Planntng Commission 9-28-88)
-"JCo~w~,t~-en~-tx~vtsimq ,h~J~h/~)ccla, atto~h~vnt,
· ~e-4~144~i~1xv~-~te~--J~etq-ep1~l!~-. (Amended by Planning Comtsston
9-28-88)
~-4~qxNq~-emersJ-eseoci art o~ astEbl t she~ ~an~hY sttrl-1- ,,- , ,-g.
.R.i,/er~de-~4,.-tJme-t,,emmt~-s4K, cessN'--t4q--tm~serH~ (Amended by Planning
Cornrot sston 9-28-88)
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Tract No. 23:103. Amended No. 1
Page 5
22.
ef-4eceqmea~4em,-4N-8..ptews-er-{4~e-lu, cpc, ,L~- e~.,,c r
P]anntng C~tsst~ 9-2~88)
(bended by Planntng ~mtsston 9-2~88)
Prtor to the recordErton of'the ftnal mp, the su~tvtder shell convey to
~he ~unty fee stmle tt'tle, to 811 c~on or c~on open space
fme and cle8~ of a]l 1tens, taxes, 8sses~nt, leases (recorded and
unrecorded) End eas~nts, except those eas~ents whtch tn the sole
discretion of the ~unty are 8cceptaM.e. ~ a conditions precedent to the
~unty accepting tttle to such areas, the su~tvtder shall su~tt the
fo]lwtng docu~nts, ~ the Plannlng ~per~nt for revtew, ~lch
d~u~nts shall be subject to the approvE1 of that depa~ent End the
~ftce of the ~unty ~el: (~nded by P18nntng C~tsslon 9-Z8-88)
1) A declaration of ~venants, conditions and restrictions; and (bended
by Planntng C~tsston 9-2N8)
2) A sample document conveying tttle to the purchaser of an Individual
lot or untt whtch protides that the declaration of covenants.
conditions and restrictions ts Incorporated theretn by reference.
(Amended by Planning Commission 9-28-88)
The declaretton of covenants. conditions and restrlcttons subettted for
revtew shall (a) provide for a tere of 60 years. (b) profide for the
establ lsheent of a property owners' association comprised of the owners of
each Individual lot or untt and (c) contatn the foilouting provisions
verbatim: (Amended by Planntng Conntsston 9-28-88)
Conditions of Approve]
Tentative Tract No. 23Z03, Amended No. :X
Page 6
"Not~rlthstandtng any provision tn thts bec~aretton to the 'contrary, the
followring provision shall apply: (Amended by Planntng Commission
9-28-88)
The property areera association established heretn shall, tf dormant,
be activated, by Incorporation or othendse, at the request of the
County of RIverside, and the property turners' association shall
unconditionally accept from the County of RIverside, upon the County's
demand, tttle to all or any part of the 'consnon area', more
particularly described on Exhtbtt ' ' attached hereto. The
dectston to requtre acthatton of the property owners' association and
the dectston to requtre that the association unconditionally accept
tttle to the 'co~non area' shall be at the sole discretion of the
County of Rherstde. (Mended by Planntng Caratsalon 9-28-88)
In the event that the common area, or any part thereof, ts conveyed to
the property owners' association, the association, thereafter shall
own such 'connon area., sha~l mnage and continuously matntatn such
'connon area', of any part thereof, absent the prtor ~ttten consent
of the P]anntng Dtrector of the County of RIverside orthe County's
successor-In-Interest. The property owners' association shall have
the rtght to assess the owners of each Individual lot or untt for the
reasonable cost of maintaining such 'connon area', and sahl] have the
rtght to 1ten the property of any such ovmer who defau]ts tn the
pennant of a mtntenance assessment. An assessment 1ten, once
created, shall be prtor to a~l other 1tens recorded subsequent to the
nottce of assessment or other document treattrig the assessment 1ten.
(Amended by P3anntng Commission 9-28-88)
Thts Declaration sha~] not be temtnated, 'substantially' amended or
-property deannexed therefrom absent the prtor ~rttten consent of the
Planntng Dtrector of the County of Rhe~stde or the County's.
successor-In-Interest.. A proposed amendment shall be considered
'substantial' tf tt affects the extent, usage or maintenance of the
'camon area'. (Amended by Planntng Commission 9-28-88)
Zn the event of any confltct betbeen thts Declaration and the Arttcles
of Incorporation, the Bylaws, or the property owners' association
Rules and Regulations,' tf any, thts Declaration shall control,"
(Amended by Planning Conntsston 9-28-88)
Once approved, the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions
shall be recorded at the same ttme that the ftnal map ts recorded,
{Mended by Planntng Commission 9-28-88).
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Tract No. 23Z03, Mended No. Z
Page 7
23. The developer shall comply with the following parkway landscaping
conditions and Spectfic Plan RO. :199, Amendment No. Z:
l)
Prtor to recordatton of the final map the developer shall ftle an
application with the County for the formation of or annexation to, a
perkyroy mintchance dtstr~ct for Tentative Tract No. 23Z02 tn
accordance with the Landscaping and Ltghttng Act of' :1972, unless-the
project ts withtn an extsttng parkway maintenance district'.
2)
Prtor to the tssuance of buildtrig pemtts, the developer shall secure
approval of proposed landscaptn and Irrigation plans from the County.
Road and Planntng Department. A~I landscaping and ~rrtgatton plans
and specifications shall be prepared tn a reproducible format suttable
for permanent ftllng with the County Road Department.
3) The developer shall post a landscape performance bond which shall be
released concurrent1 with the' release of subdivision perromance
bonds, quaranteetng ~{e vtabtllty of all landscaping whtch 'will be
installed prior to the assumption of the malntenance responstb(11ty by
the district.
4) The developer, the developer's successors-In-Interest or assignees,
shall be responsible for all parkway landscaping mtntenance untt1
such time as maintenance ts taken over by the district.
The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all
slopes, landscaped areas and (rr(gatton systems untt1 such t~me as those
operations are the responsibilities of other parttes as approved by the
Planning Director.
25. Street lights shall be provtded ~tthtn the subdivision tn accordance wtth
the standardsof Ordinance 46~ and the following:
Concurrently with the ftltng of subdhtston Improvement plans with the
Road Department, the'developer shall secure approval of the p~oposed
street 11ght layout first from the Road Department's traffic engtneer
and then from the appropriate uttltty purveyor.
Following approval of the street ltghttng layout by the Road
Department's trafftc engineer, the developer shall also ftle an
application with LAFCO for the formation of- a street 11ghttng
district, or annexation to an extsttng 11ghttng district, unless the
stte ts withtn an extsttng 11ghttng district.
3)
Prtor to recordatton of the final map, the developer shall secure
conditional approval of the street 11ghtlng application from LAFCO,
unless the stte ts wtthtn an extsttng 11ght~ng district.
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Tract No. 23103,
Page 8
Amended No. I
4) All street ltghts and other outdoor 11ghttn shall be shown
electrical plans subndtted to the Detriment of ~tldtng on
. and Safety
for plan check- approval and shall comply vlth the requirements of
RIverside County Ordinance No. 655 and the RIverside County
Comprehensive General Plan.
26. Prtor to the tssuance of GRADZNG PERHZTS the follow'ing conditions shall be
satisfied:
Prior to the tssuance of gradtng permtts, detailed coanon open space'
area landscaping and Irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning
Department approval for the phase of development tn process. The
plans shall be certified by a landscape architect, and shall provtde
for the follow!rig.
1). Permanent automatic trrtgaMon systems shall be tnstaT1ed on all
landscaped areas requiring Irrigation.
2) Landscape screening where required shall be destgned to be opaque up
.to a mintmum height of six (6) feet at mturtty.
3) All uttllty service areas and enclosures shall be screened from view
with landscaping and. decorative barriers or baffle treatments, as
approved by the Planning D~rector. Utilities shall be placed
underground.
4) Parkways and 'landscaped building setbacks shall be landscaped to
provtde vtsual screening or a transition tnto the prtmary use area of
the stte. Landscape elements shall Include earth bermtng, ground
Cover, shrubs and specimen trees tn conjunction wtth meandering
sidewalks, benches and other pedestrian amentt~es where appropriate as
approved by the Planntng Department and Specific Plan No. 199 '
Amendment No. 1.
5)
6)
7)
8)
Landscaping plans shall Incorporate the use of spectmen accent trees
at key vtsual focal pot his vtthtn the project.
Hhere streets trees cannot be planted wtthtn right-of-way of Interior
streets and project parkways due to tnsufftdent road right-of-way,
they shall be planted outstde of the road r~ght-of-way.
Landscaping plans shall Incorporate nattve and drought tolerant plants
where appropriate.
All extstIng Specimen trees and significant rock outcroppings on the
subject property shall be shown on the proJect's gradtng plans and
shall note those to be removed, relocated and/or retained,
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Tract No. 23Z~3, knended No. 1
Page 9
g) M1 trees shall be sintmum double staked. lleaker and/or slow growing
trees shall be steel staked.
the sub:)ect propert shall be
All existtng native specimen trees on cannot be preserved tKey shalq be
wh b'he~
preserved erevet feestble. they
relocated or replaced vrlth specimen trees as approved by the Planntng
Director. Replacement trees shall be noted on approved landscaping plans.
If the pro;Ject ts to be phase, pHof to the approval of grading permits,
an overall conceptual redtrig plan shall be submitted to the Planning
Director for approval, The plan shall be used as a guideline for
subsequent detatled grading plans for Individual phases of development and
shall tnclude the following:
Techniques ~htch~ill be uttllzed to prevent erosion'and sedtmentation
during and after the grading process.
2)' Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas vhtch
my be graded durtng the higher probability ratn months of January
through Parch.
3) Preqiminary pad and roadway elevations.
4) Areas of teeporary grading outside of a particular phase.
29. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide
evidence to the Director of Building and Safety that all adjacent
off-site manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and that slope
maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by the
Director of Building and Safety.
30. Grading plans shill conform' to Board adopted Hillside I)evelopment
Standards: All cut and/or'fill slopes, or tndt'vidual combinations
thereof, vhtch exceed ten feet tn ver~tcal he1 his shall be modtfied by an
appropriate combination of a spectal terracing (benchtng) plan increase
slope ratto it,e, 3:Z), retaining yells, and/or slope planttng combtned
with irrigation. All drtvmeys shall not exceed a fifteen percent grade.
All cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded natural terratn and exceeding
the grading techniques:
l) The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted'to the angle
of the natural terrain,
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Tract No. 23103, Amended No. 1
Page 10
2e
3e
2) Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded tom shall reflect the
natural rounded terrain.
3)
The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded vtth curves vtth tad11.
destgned In proportion to the total hetght of the slopes ~here
d n :
dratnage an stability permtt such round1 g.
4) idhere cut or ftll slopes exceed 300 feet tn horizontal length, the
horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved tn a continuous,
undulattng fashlon.
Prtor to the 4ssuance of BUXLD]NG PERNXTS the following conditions shall
be satisfied:
~tth to the sutetttal of building plans to the Depa~ment of Butldlng
and Safety 'the developer v411 demonstrate compliance ~tth the
acoustical study prepared for Tract 23~03 Amended No. t ~h~ch
established appropriate mtt4gatton measures to reduce ambtent tntertor
nolse levels to45 Ldn and extertor notse levels belo~65 Ldn.
b. Bufid~ng separation bet,an all buildings Including fireplaces shall
not be less than ten (10) feet.
All street stde yard setbacks shall be a wintmum of 10 feet.
In accordance vtth the v~ttten request of the developer to the County of
RIverside, a copy of whtch ts on file, and In furtherance of the agreement
between the developer and the County of RIverside, no butld~ng penntts
shall be tssued by the County of RIverside for any parcels ,tthtn the
subject tract untt1 the developer, or the developer's
successors-~n-~nterest provtded evldence of compliance wtth the terns of
satd Development Agreement No. 5 for the financtng of publlc facilities.
Prtor to the tssuance of OCCUPANCY PERHITS the folloWrig conditions shall
be satisfied:
a. Wall and/or fence locations shall substantially conform to attached
Ftgure Ill-28 of Spectftc Plan No. 199 Amendment No. 1. (Amended by
Planntng Comtsston 9-28-88)
All landsca trig and Irrigation shall be Installed tn accordance ~th
approved pVans prtor to the tssuance of occupancy permtts. Zf
seasonal conditions do not pemtt planting, tntertm landscaping and
eroston control measures shall be uttltzed as app~oved by the Planntng
Dtrector and the Dtrector of Butld4ng and Safety.
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Tract No. 23103, Amended No. i
Page 11
c, All landscaping and Irrigation shall be Installed. tn accordance ~th
approved plans and shall be vertfted by a Planntng Department field
Inspection.
d. Not withstanding the preceding conditions,the hetghts of all requt~ed
Nalls shall be determined b,v the acoustical study where applicable.
e. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the subdivision tn
accordance vrlth the standards of Ordinance 461 and Spectftc Plan No,
Zgg Amendment No. :Z,
f. Street trees shall be planted throughout the subdivision tn accordance
wtth the standards of Ordinance 460 and Spectftc Plan No. 199
Amenbent No. 1
35..Development of Tentative Tract No, 23z03 Amended No.1 conform to shall
co.mply wtth the provisions of Spedf~c Plan No, Z99 Amendment No. 1 and
Development Agreement No, 5.
KG:mp
KINNL'rH I,. El)WARDS
~lllBIr ll411NlXJt
P. O- BOX 1033
113,EPI40NE (114) I'1')401sl
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
IIIVIIIIIDE, ~e4,1PORNIA IIIOX
'Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
RIverside, California
Attention: Iregloria1 Team No. Re: '/'r4c ~ 231o 3
Me have revteved thts cue end have the follwtng coments:
Except for nuisance nature local runoff vhtch my traverse porttons of the
property the project ts considered'free froe ordinary storm flood hazard.
However, a StOrE Of unusual amgnttude could cause some damage. New construc-
tion should comply wtth all applicable ordinances.
The topography of the area conststs 0f yell defined rtdges and natural water-
courses ~htch traverse the property. There ts adequate area outstde of the
natural watercourses for butldtng sites. The natural watercourses should be
kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to Batntatn the natural
drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stattng, "All new
buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the flntshed floors a minimum of
18 tnches above adjacent ground surface. Eroston protection shall be provided
for mobile home supports."
This project ts in the
dratnage plan fees shall be paid in accordance wtth the
regulations.
Area
appl i cab1 e r~l es and
The proposed zoning ts consistent with extsttng flood hazards. Some flood
control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the
implied density.
The Dtstrtct's report dated '~e 1'7, ($i~ts stt]] current for this project.
The Dtstrtct does not object to the proposed mtnor change.
The attached comments apply.
Very truly yours,
KENNETH L. EDI~ARD5
Chtef Engtneer
JOHN H. IC~HUBA
Senior Ctvtl Engineer.
DATE:
1
KI:NNE'TI"I I_ IDWARDI
1lIB MARKT'r ITRIIT
P. O. BOX Ioaa
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
RIVIIIIIDI, ~MJIfOIINIA IlIOI
0'une 17, 1988
Eiverside County
Planning Department
County Administrat/ve Center
Riverside, California 92501
Attention: Specific Plan
Kathy Gifford
ladies and Gentlemen:
Re: Tract 23103
This is a proposal'to divide about 29 acres in the Temecula
Valley area. The site is along the west side of Butterfield
Stage Road. This tract is within Specific Plan 199 for which
the drainage plan has been approved.
Our review indicates that the 'area consists of well defined
ridges.and natural watercourses that traverse the property from
the east to the west. The applicant proposes to accept these
offsite flows across Butterfield Stage Road with culverts and
daylight the flows in their natural paths on the property.
Onsite flows would be drained with streets.
Following are the District's recommendationsz
This tract is located within the limits of the Murrieta
Creek/Temecula Valley Area Drainage Plan for which
drainage fees have been adopted by the Board. Drainage
fees shall be paid as set forth under the provisions of
the "Rules and Regulations. for Administration of Area
Drainage Plans', amended February 16, 1988:
a. Drainage fees shall be paid to the Road Copiesloner
as part of the. filing for record of the subdivision
final map or parcel map, or if the recording of a
fine/parcel map is waived, drainage fees shall be
paid as a condition of the waiver prior to recording
a certificate of cunpliance evidencing the waiver of
the parcel map~ or
be
A~tbe option of the land divider, upon filing a re-
qnired affidavit requesting deferment of the payment
of fees. the drainage fees may be paid to the Build-
ing Director at the time of issuance of a grading
pern~it or building permit for each approved parcel,
whichever may be first obtained after the recording
of the subdivision final map or parcel map= provided
bowever, this option to defer the fees may not be
.exer=ised for any parcel where grading or structures
Riverside County
Planning Department
Re: Tract 23103
June 17, 1988
have been iuit/ated on the parcel within the prior 3
year period, or p-mite for either act/vity have been
issued c~ that .parcel which remain active.
Adequate inlets end outlets should be provided to the
proposed culverts under Butterfield Stage Road. The
propriate cap-city of the culverts should be'-provided.
Erosion protection should be provided along all the fill
slopes which ere exposed to the potential erosion
hazards.
Oneits drainage facilities located outside of road right
of way should be contained within drainage easements
shown on the final'map. A note should be added to the
final map stating, 'Drainage easements shell be kept free
of buildings and obstructjones.
Offsite drainage facilities should be located within
publicly dedicated drainage easements obtained from the
affected property owners. The documents should be re-
corded and a copy submitted to the District' prior to
recordat/on of the final map.
All lots should be graded to drain to the adjacent street
or an adequate outlet.
The 10 year storm flow should be contained within the
curb and the 100 year storm flow should be contained
within the street right of way, When either of these
criteria is exceeded, additional drainage facilities
should be installed.
Drainage facilities outletting,sump conditions should be
designed tO convey'the tributary 100 year storm flows.
Additional emergency escape should also be provided.
The property's street and lot grading should be designed'-
in a manner that perpetuates the existing natural
drainage patterns with respect to tributary drainage
area. outlet points and outlet conditions, otherwise, a
drainage easement should be obtained from the affected
property owners for the release of concentrated or di-
verted storm flows. A copy of the recorded drainage
easement should be submitted to the District for review
prior to the recordation of the final map.
Riverside County
planning Department
Rez Tract 23103
June 17; 1988
Temporary erosion control measures should be implemented
Of debris onto downstream props
facilities-
watercourses remain unobstructed and stormwaters are not
diverted from ~ne watersbed to another. This may require
the construction of temporary drainage facilities or
offsite construction and grading-
12 A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final · ma along with supporting ~ydrologic and hydraulic cal-
t fo
prior to issuance of grading permits.
Questions concerning this matter may be referred to Robert Chiang
of this office at 714/787-2333·
Very truly yours,
KENNETH L- EDWARDS
Cief
~/H~H · .(ASHUBA
~enior Civil Engineer
Community Services
Engineering, Inc-
RC:sef
R 335-.14&-50
~meT, 1988
Riversi~e County Platruing
4080 I~mcm Str~, 9~h
Riversi~, C~ 92501
Attention: Mr. Ron Gol~msaz
Reference: Tentative Tract No. 23103 - Lot 18
Variance for Lot Depth to Width Ratio
Dear ~lr. Goldman.-
We are requesting · variance from the County of Riverside in regard to
Ordinance 460, Section 3.8.C. for Lot 18 of Tentative Tract No. 23103, Amend
leap No. 1. This section requires that the lot depth shall not exceed2 1/2
times the lot width.
Upon reviewing the proposed tentative, the County of Riverside Road Department
has stated that no vehicular access will be allowed frun private property onto
Butterfield Stage Road. We can only provide access to the ares previously
known as Lot 19 by combining Lots 18 and 19. This single lot has its access
truly fran Street
By not combining these two lots, the area previously known as Lot 19 becomes
inaccessable and virtually land locked. Based on these conditions anti
requirements, we therefore, rec/uest a variance fran.aforem~ntioned section of
Ordinance 460.
Thank you for your help in expediting this mtter.
Very trulyyours,
BU/em
cc: Rick Ntec, Mar33~orough Developmmnt
Bob Brink, Turrini and Brink, Planning Consultants
laRoy D. Smoot
Riverside County Planning Comntsston
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR
July 22, 1988
COUNTY ADMINIITRATIVE CENTER
MAILING ADOREIll P.O. COX ttlO
I'I, LEIINONE 11141 lell. elI,a
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Tract Hap 23Z03 - Amend
Schedule A - Team SP
With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative land
division map, the Road Department recommends that the landdivider provide the
following street improvement plans and/or road dedications in accordance with
Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Zmprovement Standards (Ordinance 46Z).
Zt is -understood that the tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerline
profiles, all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses with
appropriate O's, and that their mission or unacceptabtltty may require the map
to be resubmitted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the following
conditions are essential parts. and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding
as though occurring in a11. They are intended to be complementary and to
describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Road
Commissioner's Office.
The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages
caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, i.e., concentra-
tion of diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by
constructing adequate drainage facilities including enlarging
'existing facilities or by securing a drainage easement or by
both. All drainage easements shall be shom on the final map
and noted. as follows: -"0rainage Easement - no I~tlding,
obstructions, or encroachmints by land fills are allowed". The
protection shall be as approved by the Road Department.
The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all offstte
drainage flowing onto or through the site· Zn the event the
Road Canmisstoner pemtts the use of streets for drainage
pu oses, the provisions of Article XZ of Ordinance No. 460
wtl~ apply. Should the quantities exceed the street
capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage
purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage
facilities as approved by the Road Department.
e
NaJor drainage ts tnvolved on this landdivision and its resolution
shall be as approved by the Road Department.
Butterfield Stage bad (including
wtthtn the dedicate .right of way
No. 100, (43'/55').
RCWD site) shall be improved
tn accordance with County Standard
· C" Street shall be improved within the dedicated right of Way in
accordance with County Standard' No. 103, Section A. (44'/66').
· B" and "S" Streets shall be improved within the dedicated right
of way tn accordance with County Standard No. 104, Section A. (40'/
60').
The landdivider will provide a left turn lane on Butterfield Stage
Road at the .tntarsecl;fon with non and "S" Streets as approved by
the Road Department,
The landdivider shall provide utillty clearance from Rancho Calif.
Hater District prior to the recordatton of the final map.
The maximum centerline gradient shall not exceed 15%.
The minimum centerline radii shall be 300' or as approved by the
Road Departgent.
The minimum lot frontages along the cul-de-sacs and knuckles shall
be 35 feet or as approved by the Road Commissioner.
All driveways shall conform to the applicable Riverside County
Standards.
Haen blockwalls are required.to be constructed on top of slope, a
debris retention wall shall be constructed at the street right of
way line to prevent .silting of sidewalks as approved.by the Road
Commissioner,
Ju.ly 22, 1988
Page 3
i89
The ndntmum garage setback shal 1 be 30 feet measured from the face
of curb.
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the landdhtsion
tn accordance with County Standard No, 400 and 40Z (curb sidewalk).
Prior to the ~ecordation of the final nap, the developer shall
depostt with the Riverside County Road Department,. a cash sum of
$Z50,00 per lot'as mitigation for traffic signal impacts. Should
the developer choose to defer the time of paJment, he ma~ enter into
a ~n, fttan agreement with the County deferring said pa~4nent to the
time of Issuance of a buildtrig permit.
]mprovement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending
a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and
alignment as approved by the Riverside Count Road Comtssioner.
Completion 'of road improvements does not tmpTy acceptance for
maintenance by County,
Electrical and commntcations trenches shall be provtded tn
accordance wtth Ordinance 461, Standard 817.
Asphalttc emulsion (fog seal)shall be applied not less than
fourteen days follo~ing placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall
be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt
emulsion shall conform to Sections 37, 39 and 94 of the State
Standard SpeCifications.
Standard cul-de-sacs and off-set cul-de-sacs shall be constructed
throughout the landdhtston.
Comer cutbacks in conformance with County Standard No. 805 shall
be shom on the final map and offered for dedication,
Lot access shall be restricted on Butterfield Stage Road and so
noted on the final map,
Landdivisions creating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the streets
shall p~ovtde erosion control, sight distance control and slope
easements as approved by the Road Department.
All centerline intersections shall be at 90° with a minimum 50'
tangent measured from flow line,
,~u]..,v ?Z, 3,988
Page 4
51
79
8e
9 ·
The street design and improvement concept of this p~oject shall be
coordinated vith TR 23100, TR 23101 and SP 199.
Street lighting shall be required tn accordance vtth Ordinance 460
end 461 throughout the subdhiston. The County Service Area (CSA)
Administrator datehaines Nhether this proposal qualifies under an
existing assessment district or not. Zf not, the land okmer shall
file In application btth LAFCO for annexation fnto or creation of
I =Lighting Assessment District* tn accordance with Governmental
Code Section 56000. ·
All private and public entrances and/or intersections oppostte this
pro:lect shall be coordinate with this pro:lect and shorn on the
street improvement plans.
A strtping plan ts requtred for Butterfield Stage Road. Traffic
stgntng and strtping shall be done by County forces wtth all
tncurred costs borne bJ~ the applicant.
The landdivider shall complJ~ wtth thts department 's recommendations
for SP 199 as outlined tn our letter date June 2, Z988.
6H:lh
Very truly yours,
Gus Hughes
Road Dtvtston Engtneer
RI~-RSIDE COUNTY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
IN COOPERATION WITH THE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
RAY HEBRARD
9-20-88
TEA~ l, IATHY GIFFORD
23103
Pierental & F-eqjneerinl 0ff~,e
4080 lemon Seem. kite I i
Riverside. 'CA 92501
('/14) 7874606
WIth respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division,
the FAre Department recommends the folloMing fire protection measures be provided
An accordance rich Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection
sEamlards:
FIRE PROTECTION
Schedule 'C" fare protection approved standard fire hydrants, (6"x4"x2t") located
one at each street intersection and spaced no more than 660 feet apart in any
direction, vith no portion of any lot frontage more than 330 feet from'a hydrant.
M~nimum fare flon shall be 500 GPM for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI.'
Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water ,ystem plans Eo the
Fire Department for reviev. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location
and spacings and, the system shall meet the fire flo~ requirements. Plans shall
be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local racer company
with the folioring certification: 'I certify that the design of the racer system
is in accordance vtth the requirements prescribed by the RIverside County Flre
Dept."
The required vaEer system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted
by'the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building meterlal being
placed on an individual lot.
MITIGATION FEES
Prior to the retardation of the final map, the developer shall deposit Mith
the Riverside County Fire Department a cash sum of $400.00 per lot/unit as mitigation
for fire protection impacts. Should the .developer choose to defer the time
of payment, he may enter into aeriEten a2reement Mith the County defertin2
said payment to the the of issuance of a buildin2 permit.
All questions regarding the meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the
FAre Department Planning and'Engineering staff.
RAYHOND H. KEGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
George Tatum, Deputy FAre Hershal
. TO: RXVERSXDE GODI~ PLANNING DEPT, DATE: June 23, 1988
a~ : Z' thy Gigford
~OM: icarus hvir~ent~ Health Se~ces
B: ~ ~ 23103, Uded ~, 1
hyironnencal He<h Services has revieved Tract Map 23103, knended
No. 1. Our current counts viII ransin as stated in our
letter dated April 18, 1988,
Sl~:tac
GLN. FORM 4. ~dV.
J N2?Lq88 ";"
RIVEtib,j~ COUNTy
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
·
DEPARTMENTof HEALTH
xpr z 98e ' APR
RIVERSlIE COUNT~ PLANNING DEPT.
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92502
RIVERSIDE COUNTy
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
IIIAI,~I 2111till
CO~Oe~A, ~.A IITsO
IqEIllT. CA 11343
Attn:
Kathy Gifford
RE; Tract Map 23103; Being a portion of the Rancho Temecula
granted by the government of the United States of America to
Luis Vignes by patent dated'January 18, 1860. and recorded
in the Office of the County Recorder of San D~ego County,
California in Book 1 of patents at Page 37 and a portion of
the Rancho Pauba Government of the United States of America
to Luis Vignes by patent dated January 19. 1860 and recorded
in the off'ice of the San Diego County Recorder in Book I at
Page 45.
(lg Lots)
Gentlemen:
The Department of Public Health has reviewed Tentative Hap
No. Z3103 and recommends that:
4&-?oe OAS~ IlllLrrr
WlDiO. CA Ila~l
L&II Itllllll
30sis ;nAileD It.
L~ELIItOCqE. CA, IIlll
g~&tl
· t&~ T,&NOUITZ.,MCC4LL,II~
4~ALe/Ilqlleeg&. CA Is, llZ
lellllll
IlVllllll
lUlllOll
&lie IdlS$IIDII ItefO.
elI VIMI~F, ~Ik IJl, le
A water system shall be installed according to
plans and specification as approved by the water
company and the Health Department. Permanent
prindts of the plans of the water system shill
be submitted in tripiic&te, with a minimum scale
not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along with
the original drawing to the County Surveyor. The
prints shall show the internal pipe diameter,
location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and
joint specifications, and the size of the main
at the junction of the new system to the
existing system. The plans shall comply in
all respects with Div. 5, Part l, Chapter 7
the California Health and Safety Code, California
Administrative Code, Title 22, Chapter 16, and General
Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the
State of California. when applicable.
Riverside Cotu~ty Planning Dept.
Page Two
Attn: Kathy Gifford
April 18,'1988
The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and
water company with the following certification: "I
certify that the design of the water system in Tract
Map. 23103 is in accordance with the water system
expansion plans of the Rancho California Water Distr~ct
and that the water service,storage and distribution
system will be adequate to provide water service to
such tract. This certification does not constitute a
guarantee that it will supply water to such tract at
any specific quantities, flows or pressures for fire
protection or any other purpose". This certification
shall be signed by a responsible official of the water
This Department ~as a statement. from the Rancho California
Wate.r DIstrict agreeing to serve domestic water to each and
every lot in the subdivision on demand providing
satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the
subdivider. It will be necessary for the financial
arrangements to be made prior to the recordatzon of the
final map.
Thas Department has a statement from the Eastern Municipal
Water District agreeing to allow the subdivision sewage
system to be connected to the sewers of the District. The
sewer system shall be installed according to plans and
specifications as approved by the District, the County
Surveyor and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the
plans of the sever system shall be submitted in triplicate,
along with the original drawing. to the County Surveyor. The
prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of
manholes, complete profiles, pipe and ~oint specifications
and the size of the sewers at the junction of the new system
to the existing system. A single plat indicating location
of sever lines and water lines shall be a portion of the
sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be signed by a
registered engineer and the sewer district with the
following certification: "I certify that the design of the
sewer system in Tract Nap 23103is in accordance with the
sewer system expansion plans of the Eastern Municipal Water
District and that the waste disposal system is adequate at
this time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed
tract.'
aune 16, 1988
Board~'Directam
Richard D. Steffe7
Jame,~ Derb7
Ralph Dally
Dour KulberZ
Jon ~. landin
Jeffrey I, Minider
T.C Rowe
PhilUp L. Forbes
Director of Finance -
Norman L Thomas
D~*tor of EnS~neemS
Thomas R. MeAljester
· Discfor of Opestions
& Maintenance
Barbara J. Reed
Director of Admireration -
District Seczemry
Rutan sad Tucker
Riverside County Plarming Department
4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor
Riverside, California 92501-3657
Subject:
Reference:
Water Availability
Vesting Tract 23103
R/V=.'..:..-_
""":'= COUL.'~Ty
PLANN#NG D.~p,:...__..Tn....~N'
Gentlemen:
Please 'be advised that the above-referenced
proper=y is located within the boundaries of Rancho
California Water District. Water service, therefore,
would be available upon completion of financial
arrangements between RCWD and the property owner.
Water availability would be contingent upon the
property owner signing an Agency Agreementl which
assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
.If RCWD can be of further service to you, please
contact this office.
Very truly yours,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Senga P. Doherty
Engineering Services Representative
F012/jkw169f
RANCH'O CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRIC~
28061 DIAZ ROAD · POST OFFICE BOX 174 · TEMECULA, CA 92390~174 · [F14) 6764101 · FAX (714) 67~061'
March 16, 1988
TO:
Assessor
Building and Safety
Surveyor - Dave Duds
load Departsant '
Retlth - JLtlph Luchs
Fire Protection
Flood Control District
Fish & Game
LAYCO, S Palelay
U.S, Postal Service - Ruth E. Davidson
RIverside County Parks
Agr4 cu3 tufa Coat ss4oner
A~rpot'cs IMpart.
GROFIT
Eastern Hunt c1 pal Water' D4s~rt c~
Rancho California Ha~r Dtst."
Elstno~e Unton School Dtst. ~
Temecula Unton School Dlst.
Sierra Club
CLATRANS 38
Conntsstoner B~esson
Corm4 ss4 oner Donahoe
ShertfY's Depar'c.
:IiVE:I:biDE COUntY
PLAnninG DEPa:ICrilErlC
,QPR 18 1S88 ' '
· RIVERSIDE COUNTy
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
VESTING TRACT 23103 - (Sp rl) - E.A.
32535 - Iaarlborough Developaerie Corp. -
Rancho California/Skinner Lake Area First
& Third Supervisorgel District - ~est of
Butterfield Stage Road., North of Xancho
California Road - R-A-1 Zone 29 Acres
into 19 lots - Schedule C - (CONCURRENT
CASE SP 199, and #I,.CZ 5107,TR 23100,
23101, 23102) (RELATED CASE SP 199,
Hargarita Village) '- Nod 120/339 - t ',
923-210-001-6
rlease review the case described above, along with the attached case rap, A land
Oivisiou Committee meeting has been tentatively scheduled for Hay 16, 1988. If it clears,
'it vLI.1 then So to public hearing.
Your comments and recommendations are requested prior to Hay 1, 1988 in order that we may
include them in the staff report for this particular case.
Should you have any questions regarding this .item, please do not hesitate to contact
Kathy Gifford at 787-6356
Planner
The Elsinore Union High School District facilities are overcrowded
and our educational progrxme seriously impacted'by increasing student
population caused by new residential, commercial and industrial con-
struction, Therefore, pursuant to California Government Code Section
53080 of AB 2926 and SB327, this district levies a fee against all new
develolment projects within its boundaries.
DATE: SX GNATUEE · , . :.,,,,-.
~va~v .,4., "'el °"~ +4,q,,, Joseph' ntendent
,(080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 787-6181
46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
(619) 342-8277
!ZO/O/eg
IlmmI,WmmSad
Zmmmmm~SmCmmimmm
April 15, 1988
RIverside County Plmnntng Department
4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor
RIverside, Ca11forrite 92501
kmm M. Cmmmkmnm. Pmmmmm
limmmef_iiley..Vmmlqmmmm
Wm.G. AkmMm
OmmmmC. G,lm,~
mmmeD. Smm
immmmmmCllammms
' ..~ ;-. .:-.i:'~.-..::..'
k: :' P,, ,% 15 8 """*
SUBJECT: VESTZNG TRACT 23103 (SlYford)
The DtstrtCt ts 'responding ~0 7our request for cormeats on the sub:leer
project(s) relat4ve to the provts4on of water and sewer serY4ce. The. ttems
checked below apply to th~s project review.
The subject project:
Zs not vtthtn EMl~'s:
X water sewice area
se~r service area
Rust be annexed to thts Dtstrtct's Improvement Dtstrtct No. in order
to be eligtble to receive domestic wa'ter/santtary sewer serve.
Will be required to construct the following facilities:
a. ) Water Service
b.) Seer Service Comnts ware submitted to RIverside Co. (Feb.,
15, 1988) regarding SP 199 - Am tl. Thts is to reiterate those comments that
seers ere to be grevtty, regionally stzed and no seers ~fll be allowed on
private lands, or along lot. lines. They are to be tn streets.
Riverside County Planning Dept.
Page Three
AT~N: Kathy Gifford
April 18, 1988
It vill be nmcmssary for finxncial &rrangements to be mxde
prior to the recordation of the final map.
Environmental Health Services
.SH:tac
ATTACHMENT 5
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CITY
OF
June 15, 1992
Brian Hsgate
Commul~ Ellgine~-riqg Sel"vices, hie.
5225 Canyon Cxr, st Drive, Suite 360
Riverside, CA 92507
SUBJECT: Notice of City CotincH Approval for the Second Extemion of Time for Vesting
. Tenintive ~ Map No. 23103
The City of Temecula City Council, at its meeting of May 26~ 1992 approved your request for
an extension of time for an 18 lot r~sidential subdivision on 29.2 acres on the property generally
located on the west side .of Butterfi~ld Stage Road beiw~ 12 Serena Way and Rancho
California 'Road in Temecula.
This second extension of time wffi expire on November 8, 1992, unless extended pursuant to
Ordinance No. 460 of the City of Temecula and the provisions of the State of California
Subdivision Map Act.
ff you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the Planning D~,-~ax~nent at
(714) 694-6400.
Sincerely,
Associate Planner
Debbie Ubnoske
Senior Planner
klb
43174 I~iN~S PARK Dmn · Tu4~cu~ CAUPORNtA 9'2~0 · PHONE (714)694-1989 · FAX (714)
CONDITIONS OF APPROV~
ATFA~ 2
CFI'YOF~
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Ve, stin~ T~nmtiv~ Tract Map No. ~103
May 26, 1992
November 8, 1992
Unless previously paid, prior to ti~ issuance of a gnadinff permlt~ the applicant shall
comply with the provisions of Ofrlinnnt~ No. 663 by payin~ the app~x~px~te fee set fcrrth
in that o~in~ance. Should OrdinganCe NO. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a
Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance No.
663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by tl~ Habitat Conservation Plan as
implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
The subdivider shall submit to the Planning Director verification that Section 10.35 of
Ordinance No. 460 has been satisfied regarding payment of parks and recreation fees in
accordance with Section 10.35 of Ordinance No. 460. Verification shall be submitted
prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy.
No building permits shall be issued by the City for any .residential lot/unit within the
project boundary until the cleveloper's successor's-in-interest provides evidence of
compliance with public facility financing measures. A cash sum of one-hundm:i dollnr$
. ($100) per lot/unit shall be deposited with the City as mitigation for public library
development.
This conditionally approved Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
23103 will expire one (1) year after the original expiration date, unless extended
provided by Ordinance 460. The expiration date is November 8, 1992.
The subdivider shall comply with the original Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract
Map No. 23103 (see attached) except as mended herein.
TENIECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
Prior to the recordation of the Final Map, the applicant or his assignee shall pay the 'fair
market value of 0.23 acres of parallel to satisfy Quimby reqnirements. The mount to
be paid shall be determined by TCSD staff within thirty (30) days prior to the recordafion
of said map.
10
any i~ ~eAieat~ street simll be offered with an easement to the TCSD for
fflajnten,nc~ following compliance w TCSD mnttaxds and completion of the atpplication
proce. s~. All slope and open space axcas shall be id~rifie~l by numbered lot, with the
squamfootageofsaklama~notsdonthefinalmap. (StmckandxL*visedatthePkuning
Commition ID__m~,!~ on Mat~ 16, 1992).
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
The fortowing are the Depamnent of Public Works =d,m;o,,o~ C~,,,mlpns of Approval for this
pwject, and shall be completed at no cost to any C.,evenaan~t Agency. All questions regarding
and their omi-.icm my require the pto~ to be a~s-b, nilWd for further xeview and
xcVision.
The subdivider shall comply with nil previous Conditions of Approval for this project
. except as amended or suj/~ ~. -
PRIOR TO I~POPr~ATIC~N OF ~ FIN.AT. MAP:.
Pursuant to Secti._on 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act any robdivision which is part of
an cxj.~ting ,~sse~nemt District must comply with the 'requi~tnents of said section.
Subdivider shall deposit with the City of Temecuh an mount suf~cinE to cover the
construction of that portion of Butterfield Stage Road between where the-westcr-l~[~ ,/,
property line intersects with the westerly fight-of-way line and extends to intersect with
thc centerline of the street. This portion of Bunex'fmld Stage Road shall be completed
by the developer of Tract Map No. 23209, and said funds shall bc reimbursed to the
developer of Tract Map No. 23209 upon completion of the improvements.
The vertical design of Bunca'field Stage Road shall bc as approved by the City of
Tcmccula.
lvtaj. ntcxm~cc for slop~, drainage devices and open space areas must be provided by
Tc...oculn Co,....unj~ So, ~'iccs Dist.:ct or the Homeownen Association. The limits of
each rnaintcnance area must be defined by numbe, r'-xl lots on the map. (Stuck at the
Planning Commission meeting on lVhrch 16, 1992).
A median ishnd shall be shown on the street improvement plans and shall be constructed
within Butterfield Stage Road per City standard No. 100 and as directed by the
Depamnent of Public Works, or bonds shall be posted, as part of the street impwvement
plam.
swr~u,r~zosv'm.cc 11
Prior to im,-,,ce of a _m,~m~ pennic,'~ must obmin· Nadomd Ponumnt
Disch~ ~h,,i,~ System (XPD~ permit from the Ste W-,~/~ Cmm-ol
Prior to l~--,,-.,ce, of ~ml~h
shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public l~acility fee~ a copy of which has been
provided to developer. Coacun~fiy, with e~ec,,tln,, this Agreement, develapcr'shall
Post sec~ to secure paym~ut of tbe Public ~.fee. The amomat of the security
shall be S2.00 per square foot, not to exceed $10,000. Dev~ unde~ that said
Agreement my zequim the payment of fees in caracas Of those now esfimnteaJ (axqtmin[
developer will waive any fight to protest the provisions of thi~ Condition, of thi.~
developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any ~ 'Impact fec,
and the mount t~.
s~'r,,,pnrrmtmv.rm. cc 12
ATTACHMENT Ii
CITY OF TEMECULA
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Vesting Tentative Tra~t Map No. 23103
.Clcy. Ce,,,,,+~ Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
Hay 28. 199!
Novembe= 8. 1991
Plannine 'Department
Unless previously paid, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the
applicant shell canply with the provisions of Ordinance ND. 663 by paying the
appropriate fee sat. forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be
superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the
payment of the fee required by Ordirmnce No. 663, the applicant shall pay the
fee required by the Habitat Canserv~ion Plan as implemented by County
ordinance or resolution. '
The subdivider shall submit to the Planning Diremr verification that Section
10.35 of Ordinance No. el0 has been satisfied regarding payment of parks and
recreation fees in a,.c~,Jence with Section 10.35 of Ordinance No. ~60.
Verification shall be submitted prior to issuance of any certificate of
occupancy'.
No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residential lot/unit
within the project boundary until the devetoper~s successor's-in-interest
provides evidence of c~mpliance with public facility financing .measures. A
cash sum of one-hundred dollars (S100) per let/unit shall be deposited with
the City as mitigation for public library development.
This conditionally approved Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract
MaD No. 23103 will expire one (1) year after the original expiration date,
unless extended as provided by Ordinance ~60. The expiration date is.
November 8, 1991.
The subdivider shall comply with the original Conditions of Approval for
Tentative Tract Map No. 23102 (see attached) except as amended heroin.
Enaineerina Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All cquestians
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Deloartment.
$TAFFRPT\VTM23103
It is understood trmt The Developer ~grre~tly shows all existing easements. travelear
ways. and drainage toursea, 'and Their minion my recluire the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
The Develol~er shall cmmlgly with the State ,f California Subdivision Map A '-
and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions.
The final map shall be prepared by i lienseel land surveyor or rec~iszered
i
Civi Engineer, subje~ te all the r~luirstents of the State of C~iifornia
Subdivision Map Act and Ordinaries No. li0.
8. Submit letter from adjaeerrt property owner that the proposed drainage on
their prgperl:y is aca:ept~ble Zg Them.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
9. As~'~'--'dnecmmarYbYZheCltYEngineerm'hilr~,,.vvt_,tativethedeveiolaer
shall receive written r. tearanea frm the following agencies:
10.
11.
- Ranabe California Water Distrie~:
- Eastern Municipal Wmar Dir, ri~t:
- Riverside County .Fieeel Ceazrel diszri~:
- City ef Temecula Fire Bureau:
- Planning D.q' -
Engineering D.N-- L,. _,t:
- Riverside County Health Deparu~nt:
- CATV Franchise: and
- Parks and Recrution Dope, L,..~
All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for deallotion
the puiglic and shall mntinue in f~r~e until the City
aftere. All ctedieazions shall be free frm, all enc4ambranm as approveel by
City Engineer.
12.
13.
Vehicular access shall be restricted on Butterfield Road and so noted on the
final map.
Easements, when required for roadway sJol~es: landscape easements, drainage-
facilities, utilities', etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located
within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and c~nveyances
shall be submitted and recareled as directed by the City Engineer.
A declaration of Covenants. Conditions and Restri~-'tions (CCZ;R'sJ shall be
t~rel~ared by the developer and submitted to the Direr'mr ef Planning. City
Engineer and City Attorney. The CC~;R's shall be signed and acknowledged
by all parties having any record title interest in the p, or--, Ly TO be develolxd.
shall make the City a party thereto. and shall be enforr. eabte by the City.
The CC~;Rss shall be reviewed and appr~ved by the City and retarded. The
CC~;R's shall be subject to the following ~nditions:
STAFFRPT~VTM23103
2
The CCF, R's shall be prepared at the cievetoper's sole r~s~ ano exDense.
The CCaRes shall be in the form and content aDproved by the Dire~ur
of Planning, City Engineer and the City Attorney, and sicall inciuae
such provisions as are recluirm=l by this approval and as said officials
deem necessary to protegt the interest of the City and its resiaents.
Ce
The CC:~;R's and Articles of Inmrperation of the Property Owner's
Amci~i~ ~ subj~ m ~ app~l d ~ Planni~ and Engin,ring
Diveions and ~e City A~ey. They ~all be r~raed ~n~r~nt
w~ ~ ~l m- A ~ ~ ~11 be p~vided to the City.
The Cr.J;R's shell !~vide fro- the. effective Istablishment, ol~emion,
mnlgmllmqT., use. repair and mintarmnce of Ill common areas and
facilities.
The CC~R~ shell prorick that the ~ shall be developed,
operated and rainrained so Is net ta creme 8 public nuisanu.
fe
The CCSR's shall provide that if the p, ,q,.~ Ly is not rainrained in the
condition required by the CCSR~I. then the City. after making due
demand end giving , .... ,able netic~, may enter the property and
perfro-m, m the or.,. :s ale e~pensl, any maintenance required
ther~n by the CCi;Rss er the City ordinances, The property shall be
subject TO a lien in favor of the City te secure any such expense net
prmnptly reimbursed.
i. The declaration shall contain language prohibiting further
subdivision of any lets, whether they are lettered lots or
nu.d.,c, ,J Ira,
ii.
All parkways. open areas. end landscaping shall be permanently
maintained by hc,,~av., ,re ~rirtion m' ether means ac=eptable
to the City. Such proof cdr this maintenance shall be submitted
to the Planning and Enginering Divisions prior to issuance of
building permits.
The developer. or the developer's successor. shall execute a current Public
Facilities Agreement with the City of Ternscala which provides for*the payment
of the sum of money per residential unit then ermblished by Resolution of the
City Council, prior to the issuance of any building peaits for any individual
lots ..
15.
The subdivider shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be
executed guaranteelag the construction of the following public improvements
in c:nformance with applicable City stanciargis.
ae
Street improvements, including, but net limited to: pavement, curb
and gutter. medians, sidewalks, drive approaches. street lights,
S T A F F R P T\ VTM23103
16.
17.
signing, striping, traffic signal systems, and other traffic control
devices as appropriate,
b, Stars drain facilities,
Landscaping Istreet and park;),
d. Sewer and ckeneitic water systens.
e. . Un~-. ~,~unding d existing and p, .~r ~ -) utility distribution lines,
The street design mad improveserA mncept of this project shall be coordinated
with adjoining day, el%~ .!.its,
Street lights ·hall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in
acc:..jf--'l with the standards of Ordinance No. l;61 and as approveci by the
r. jty Engineer.
Prior to ,,: . Men of the final maR, the devebper shell deposit with the
Engineering Depab ~,.t,t a cash man as emabiished, pe~. lot.. as mitigation
t~t:: . Js traffic ·ignBl ifr~;- ~e, SheMid the 'mt.l'eper choose to defer the tim
of ~ .of traffic sip mitigation fee, he map/enter into a written
8g, za ,~l.,t with the City deferring laid payment to the time of issuance of .8
building permit.
A minimum enterline street grade ·hall be 0.50 percent.
20.
21.
22..
'23.
All driveways shall be located a minimum of two (2) feet from the property
line.
The subdivider shall submit four prirrts of · u-,,H, ,hen·lye grading plan
the Engineering D-T, , b,,a,,t. The plan shell comply with the Uniform Building
Code. Chapter 70, and as may be additionally provided for in thee Conditions*
of Approval. The plan ·hall be drawn on 21l" x 36" mylar by · Registered Civil
Engineer.
A 9oological report shall be prepare by a qualified engineer or geologist and
submitted at the time of application for grading plan check.
The subdivider shall submit four copies of a soils report to the Engineering
Department. The repor~ shall address the soils Stability and geological
conditions of the site.
A drainage rr. uciy shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer.
All drainage facilities sail be installed as required by the City Engineer.
STAFFRP'1'%VTM23103
7,5. On-site drainage facilities, located outside of road right-of-way. shall be
contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note snail be
added to the final map stating "Drainage easements shall be kept free of
buildings and obstructions,"
26. A copy af the improvement plans, grading plans and final map, ·long with
supporting hydralogic and hydraulic calculations should be submittact to the
Riverside Ca=unty Flood ContrOl DistriCt fro' review.
27. Adequate provisions shall be mack .for aczw42tancs and disposal of surface
drainage entering the property' from adjacent areas.
28. Prim- to final map, the subdivider shall neUfy the Ctty:s CATV Franchises of
the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to. CA'D/Standards at tim
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
29.
3O.
31.
Prior ts any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid
and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office.
A grading pemit shall be mined from the Engineering Department prior to
commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-of-
way.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing
Ares Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area air new development. The
charge is payable to the Flood Control District prim- to issuance of permits.
!f the full Are· Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to
this property, no new =barge needs to be paid,
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT:
32.
A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for
review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil
Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue · Final
Soils Report addressing compaction and sits conditions.
33.
Grading of the subject property shall be in ac=ardance with the Uniform
Building Code. City Grading Standards and acesplod grading practices. Th'~
final grading plan shall be in substantial conform·rice with the approvedrough
grading plan.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
Construct full street improvements including but nat limited to, curb end
gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches. parkway trees and
street lights on all interior public streets,
STAFFRPT\VTM23103
Existing city roacis requiring =nstruction shall remain open to traffic at all
times with adequate detours during c~nstructien,
Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied nat Jess than 1~ days foliowin.
placement of-the asphalt surfacing and shall be applied at a rate af 0.05 go!
per squart yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section Nee. 37.39. a ~
~ of the SLum Smdard SpecJfiutions.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and publi= facilities
impcald upon thl property or project. including that for traffic and public
facility J~itigation as required under the EIRINegative Declaration for me
project, in the amount in effect at the tim of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or .district has net been finally
established by the date on which Developer mum-its building permits for
the project or any phase thor, d. the Developer .shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee. a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said A~... r .4.4 may require the
payment of fee in -xr- · of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the
project in the ranaunt of such fetl) and slxcificalh/waives its right to protest
such incrmase.
Transoortation Enainem-ina
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
38.
39.
A signing plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and/pproved
by the City Engineer for Chenin Clinet and Placer Loudeaonne and shall be
included in the street impact plans.
Condition No. 7 in the County of Riverside Road letter dated July
shall be deleted.
Prior to designing any of the above. plans, cgntact Transportation Engineering
for the design requirements.
Condition No. 28 in the County of Riverside Raid letter dated Juty ZZ. 1988
· hall be modified to rend: A signing and striping plan shall be designed by
a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer for Butterfield
Stage Road and shall be included with the street improvement plans.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY ENCROACHMENT PERMITS:
A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil
Engineer and approved by the City Engine.riot any street closure and detour
or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the City Engineer.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE'OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS:
All signing and striping ·hall be installed per the approved signing and
striping plans.
S T A FF R P T\ VTM23103
ItlVERSI~-C%}UNTY PLANNIIG DEPART!~NT
StIDiVlSIOR
l:Ola3~ OF APPROVAL
~AT%~ ~ NO.
DATE.: g-,ZB-.B8
~NO. 1
STANDARD
The suMtvtder shall defend, Indemnify, End bold harmless the County of
Riverside, 1as agents, officers, end employees fnn aqy claim, action, or
proceeding against the County of Riverside.or 1as agents, officers, or
employees ta attack, set utde, void, or annul an approval of the County
of Riverside, 1as advtsory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body
concerning Tentative Tr/ct 23103, Amended No. lo which action ts brought
about wtthtn the time period ;rovtded for tn California Government Code
Section 66499.37. The Cmmty of Riverside will promptly notify the
subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the County of
Riverside and will cooperate fully in the defense. Zf the County fails to
promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding .or
fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, tndenmtfy, or hold i~rmless the
County of Riverside.
The tentative subdivision shl!l comply with the State of California
Subdivision Nap Act and to 811 the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule
B, unless modified by the conditions listed below.
This conditionally approved tentative map wilq expire two years after the
County of Riverside Board of Supervisors approval date, unless extended Is
provided by Ordinance 460.
The final map shall be prepared by m licensed land surveyar subSect to all
the .requirements of the State of California' Subdivision Nap Act mad
Ordinance 460.
The sul~ivtder shall submit one copy of m soils report to the Riverside
County $urveyor's Office mad two copies to the Department of Building and
Safety. The report shall address the soils stability and geological
conditions of the site.
If any grading is proposed, the subdivider shill submit one print of
comprehensive grading plan to the Department of Building mad Safety. The
;an shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended
Ordinance 457 and as maybe additionally provided for in . these
conditions of approval.
.Buiidina i~ Safety DeD~r-.ment
Submit Ippr~ved ~ mlp to the Department of Building and Safety fer
addressing prier to submittal far Strua. ural Plan Review·
Obtain land Use and Building Department clearances.
School fees shall be paid to Tenecula Unified Scheel District.
STAFFRPT~VTMZ3103
Czmdtttons of Anlroval
~entattve ~ract No. ~31Cl3, Amended
Page 2
..)
J
A grading penwit ;hall be obtained from the IMpstruant of Buffdin; and
Saintly prtor to caweqceee*, of anl~ gradtel outside of county mint·teed
road i'lght of m~.
8. Any delinquent p,o;z, Ly taxes shall be petd prior to record·lion of the
~l rap. .
g. The subdivider shall comply With the street tepr~vement recmmendattons
outlined h the Ittverstde County bad I)epsrtmnt's lefT. or ds~ed 7-ZZ-B8 a
colV .of .htch ts attache~
Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provtded from the tract
map boundary tea County mtntatned road.
&11 road usemenU shall be offered for dealteaton to the puMtc and shall
· continue In force an1:11 the governing body accepts or abandons such
offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved
by the bad Comdsstoner. Street names shall be sub·act to approval of
the bad Comets·toner.
Easenears, when required for roeMy slopes, drainage facfitties,
utilities, etc., shall be shou~ on the final mp tf they are located
wtthtn the land division boundary. M1 offers of dedication and
conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as direcared by the County
Surve3mr.
~iater ._and sewerage dtsposa~ facilities shall be ~nstalled tn accordance
with the provisions set forth ~n the R4vers4de County Hea~th Departmanias
letter dated 6-23-88 · copy of ehtch ts attached.
The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recoauendat~ons
outlt~ed by the'R~vers4de County Rood Control D~strtct's letter dated
~-:~7-66 9-27-88 a copy of ~ch ts attached, Xf the ~snd d~v~s~on 1tea
~thtn an adopted flood cont~l dratnage ares pursuant ~ Section ~0.25 of
~tnance. 460, app~pr~ate fes for the const~ctton of a~a drat~ge
facilities s~l be co~ected by the bed ~sstoner. (~ended by
P~&nntng ~tsston
The subdSvtder sha~l comply with the fire improvement recommndattons
outlined tn the County Fire Par·hal's .letter dated 9-29-88 a copy of which
ts attached.
~ubdtvtston phasing, 4nclud4ng. any Froposed connon open space Ere·
taptorment phiate, 1f applicable, shall be sub:Jeer to Planning
1)apartmet approva~i. Any p~oposed phising sh·~l p~ovtde for adequate
vehicular access to el~ lots ~n each phase, and shall substantially
conform to the talent and purpose of the subdivision approval.
Condtt4ens of Approval
Tentative Tract lie. 23Z03, Amended No. 2
Page 3
19t3 created by tlrls sulxltvtston shall cempl3~ ~tth the folioking:
· All lots shall have a stintram size of :1 acre gross.
b. All lot length to vldth rattos shall be tn co·formate vlth Section
3.81: of Ordinance 460.
c. Corner lo13 and through lots, tf a~y, shall be provided kith
additional area pursuant to 'bctton 3.88 of Ordinance 46D and so as
not to contain less net area than the leas+. amount of net area
non-corner and thro. ugh lo13.
d. lets created by this sulxl~Fis~on shall be ~n conform·ca kith the
development standards of the Specific Plan Ro. ZSg Amendment No. :~
zone.
e. krnen lots ire crossed by m3orpubltc ot(111y easements, each
shall have · net usable area of not less than 3,600 square feet,
exclusive of the utility easement_
f. Graded but undeveloped land shall be mint·toed tea weed-free
condition and shell be etaher planted kith interim landscaping or
provided kith other erosion contro~ measures Is approved by t~
Director of Building and $afety. ~
Trash bins, loading ·rats and incidental storage areas shall be
located sway and visually screened from surrounding areas kith the use
of block wa~ls and landscaping.
.18. Prior to RECORDATION of the final mp the followring conditions shall be
satisfied:
Prior to the record·rio· of the final mp the applicant shall sueate
w~ttten clearances to the Rherstde County Road and Survey Deparment
that all pe~tnent requirements outlined tn the attached approval
letters from the fo110~ng agencies have hen met.
County FIreD·purl·ant
County Flood Control
County Parks hparment
leaecho biter Dtstrtct
' County Health Department
County Planning Deparl~ent
Eastern Pun.tctpal Mater Dtst"
Prior te the recordarSon of the final mp, General Plan Amendment
1SO, Specific Plan No. Zgg, Amendment No, Z, Development Agreement No.
5, and Change of Zone No. S~07 shall be approved by the Board of
Supervisors and shell be effective. Lots created by th~s land
Conrill:tons of Approval
TenUthe Tract No. 23103. Mended No. ~I
Page 4
.)
.)
dtviston shall be 1. conformann rlth the developnent s,Undards of ~he
zone ulttErtely applled to the proper'q.
lg. A11 extsttng structares on the subject mr~ sfull be removed p~tor to
recordaCt on of the fi M1 mp.
lapam to the Temcula Eiemento-7 and Elsinore Unton High School Distrtct
shall be edttgated at the .development application stage tn accordance ~t~h
the dtstrtcl; policies.
The comon open space area stall be sham as · and lot on the final
mp and shall be managed by a mater prodFry owners association or
(Amended by Plam'rng Cmmlssio~
b.y Planntng Camtss~on 9-28-88)
P~anntng C~=mtss$on 9-26-88)
~ondtttons of Approvil
Tentative Tra~ No. 23103, Antended No. :1
Page 5
e/-~e~e rf~ ~4e~-~k-g,j4M-e~the-lh ~pc. {~c,..:, ~-~ssec~e{~ee-krles
a~-~AL;~ns-,-+f-eS~-~J-Occla. &L{~ ~l-~./nL~ ~1~ ~ (Amended b~
Planntng Camtssto~ 9-28-88)
(Amended b~ Plafintng Commission 9-26-88)
Prtor to the recordalton of the final map, the subdivider shall convey t "'
~he County fee s~mple
ttle, to lll conenon or cramran open space areas,
free and clear of all 1tens, ~axes,- asses·men1;, leases (~ecorded and
unrecorded) and easements, 'except those easements .vhtch tn the sole
discretion of the County are acceptable.. As a condtl:tons preceden~ to the
County accepting tttle to such areas, the subdivider shall suixntt the
follov ng documents to the Planning' Department fop review, ~htch
documents shall be' subject to the apprevsl of that department and the'
Office of the County Counsel: (Amended by Planntng ~sston 9-26-88)
2) A declaration of covenants, cond4ttons and restrictSons; and (Amended
by Planntn9 Conu~tsston 9-28-88)
2) A sample document 'conveying Stile to the purchaser of an Individual
lot or untt ~htch provtdes that the declaration of covenants,
conditions end restrictions ts tnco.rporsted theruth by reference.
CAmended by Pllnntng Commission 9-26-B8)
The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions submitted for
raYtaw shill (l) provtde for · term of 60 3sara, (b) provtde for the
establtshment of · prope~l:y owners' Issoctltton comprised of the owners of
each Individual lot or untt and (c) conta(n the folloving provislons
verbatim: (Amended b~ Planntng Connlsston 9-26-88)
Conditions of Aptrival
Tenu~tve Tract liD'. 23103, ~me~ied Ito. i
Page 6
"ltotvlthstandtng any provision te thts t)eclsrs~lon to the contrary, the
foliosing proFISton shall applJn (Amended by Planning ramlssion
I-Z8-88)
'The propert~y oatera usertiPtoe established hernia shall, 4f dormant.
· be activated, ~ tnr~. p~, s%ton or othervise,- 81 the request of the
County of Ittverstde, and the .p,.ll~s:Ly oanrrsa association shall
unconditionally accept fan the Count~ of RIverside, upon the County's
demand, title. to all er an~ 1art of the 'connon area', more
particularly deathbed on ExhlMt s s attached hereto. The
decision to require activation of the property ramera* association and
the decision to require that the usocta~lon ncondtttonally accept
title to the scanon area' shall be st the sole discretion of the
County of liverside. -(Amended by Planning Coastsalon 9-28-68)
In the went that the Connon area, o~ any pl~t thereof, is conveyed to
the property ramera' association, the association, thereafter shall
okra such 'coneon Ires., shall leaage and continuously mintsin such
'c~,~un area', of any part thereof, absent the prior v~itten consent
of. the Planntng Director of the County of Riverside or the County's
successor-lr~tnterest. The properl;F meets' association shall have
the rtght to assess the o~ners of each individual lot or untt for the
reasonable cost of maintaining such 'common area', and sahll have the
right to lien the prope~y of any such o~ner vho defaults in the
payment of a maintenance assessment. An assessment lien, once
created, shall be prior to all other 1tens recorded subsequent to the
nottce of assessment or other document creating the assessment 1ten.
(Amended by Planning Commission 9-26-88)
Thts t)eclaratton shall not be terminated, 'substantially' amended or
prope~l:y aleannexed thereIron absent the prior vl-ttten consent of the
Planntng Director ~of the County of RIverside or the County'w
successor-In-Interest. A proposed amendment shall be considered
'substantial' tf 11: attracts the extent, usage or mintchance of the
'coonon area'. (Amended by Planntng ComaFission 9-26-88)
2n 'the event of any conflict between thts Declaration and the A~l:Jcles
o~ 1ncorporal:ton, the By~.avs, or the property owners' association
Ru~es and Regulartens, If any, thts kclarstton shall control.'
(Amended by Planntng Countsalon 9-26-88)
Once spproved, the declaration of covenants, condlttons and restrictions
shall be recorded at the same time that the final map ts recorded-
{Amended by Planntng Camaisston 9-28-88),
Conditions of Approval
~enUttve Trac~ llo. 23203, kendeal No. 2
The. developer shall comply vtth the folioring parkk~y landscaping
cendg~toas and ktftc Plan N~ 299, bit llo. ~:
2)
PFtoP to recoedsttee of the ftnal mp the developer shall ffle an
appltuttoa vtth the _County for the forrotten of or enneutton to, ·
lark·my mt~ titstrict for Tentative Trct No. 23%02 tn ·
accordance vltk the La---escep4ng and Ltghttng Act of ]~72, unless the
pro;leer ts vtthte u exist. tag perkely mintshence dtstrict~
z)
Prior to the 1see·ace ef ·mildleg permits, the developer shall secure
approval rlr prop.~ laP-dscq;~ and lrr4~t~ee plans from the County
bid end Planning I)eirlxmt, ArtJill l!~dsc,ptag and Irrigation plans
and specifications kbell be prepsred tea ,ape Qductble forest suttable
lot permnnt flllng vltb the Coun~ load Depement.
3)
The developer sial1 post a. landscape performance bond ~htch shall be
released concurrent1 vlth the release of sufxltvtston performance
boas, quarant··leg ~ vtabtltty of all landscaping vhtch rill be
1natalled prior to the assumption of the mint·hence responsibility by
the dt strt c*k.
4) The developer, the developer's successors-In-Interest or assignees,
shall be responsible for 811 larkkey landscaping maintenance unit1
such ttme is mint·hence is taken over by the district.
24. The developer shall be. responsible for mint·hence and upkeep of
slopes,"';' l~mndscaped areas and trr~gatlon systems unit1 such time is those
operations Ire the responsibilities of other parties as approved by the
P1 snn~ng Di rector.
25. Street- qtghts shill be provtded krtth~n the .subdivision in accordance krlth
the standards of Ordinance 462 and the follokdng:
2) Concert·ally vtth the f$lSng of subdivision Saproy·meet plans vtth the
Road Deparlment., the developer shall secure Ipproval of the proposed
street light 1,out first from the bid Department's trafftc engineer
and then from the. approprSate uttllty purveyor.
2) Follakring approval of the street l~ghttng layout by the bid
l)epertaent's trlfftc engineer, the developer shall also ftle an
application ~th LAFCQ for the formitSon of · street lighting
dtstr~ct, or annexation to in extsttng 11ghttng district, unless the
sltats irlthtn in extsttng .lighting
3) Ih-lor to recordalton of the fans1 amp, the developer shall secure
conditional approval of the street 11ghttng application from I..A. FCO,
unless the stte ts krtth~n in extsttng 11ghttng dtstr~ct.
Conditions of Approval
Tentstire Tract No. 23Z03, kaended No. 1
Page 8
26.
4) All street lights and other egMoor lightin shall be shm~
electrical plans subedited to the Departsmet of L4ldtng and
for plan check approval sad shall camply vtth the req~4rements of
Riverside Count3~ Ordinance lie. 655 and the IL"lverstde County
Comprehensive' General Plan.
Prtor to the issuance of GKAD:IIG PEIU(F!'S the foilrating 'conrill:tons sha~l be
satisfied:
Prior to the issuance of grading perfits, deistled canon open space
area 1madsoaping and irrigation plans shall be subn~tted for Planning
Department approval for the phase of developneat in p~ocess. The
plans shall be certified by a landscape a~chttect, and shall p~ovide
for the .fo111:Mtng,
2). Permanent automatic trrtgatlon sy~tms shall be Installed on all
landscaped a~eas requiring t~rtgatton.
Landscape screening where requtred shaII be destgned ~o be opaque up
to a ,dntmum height of six (6) feet at mturtty.
3)
4)
All u~fltty service areas and enclosures shall be 'screened. from v~e~
vtth landscaping and decorative barriers or baffle areamania, as
approved by the Planning D~rec~or. tJ~tltt~es shall be placed
unde~und. ,
Parkrays and landscaped building setbacks shall be landscaped to
provide v~sual screening or a transition tnto the pr(ma~ use a~ea
the site. Landscape elaneats shall include earth beming~ g~ound
cover, shrubs and spe:~men trees in conjunction krtth .meandering
sidewalks, benches and other pedestrian amentt~es vhe~e appropriate as
app~oved by the Planntng Deparbnent and Specific Plan No.
bendmona No, },
5) Landscaping plans- shall t. ncorporate the use of spectmen accent trees
at Key visual focal points rlthtn the pro~ect,
6)
i/here streets trees cannot be planted krlthtn right-of-kay of interior
streets and pro~ect parkeys due to insufficient road rtght-of-~a~,
they shall be planted outside of the road rtght-of-ey,
7)
8)
Landscaping plans shall Incorporate nsttve and d~ought tolerant plants
where appropriate. '
All extsttn9 spec.~men trees and significant rock outcroppings on the
subject propert~ shall be sho~n on the project's grading plans and
shall note those to be removed, relocated and/or reT, stned.
Contit:tons of App,wal
Tentative Trsc~ Ido. 23203, Amended No. '1
P·ge 9
29.
31.
S) . A11 trees shill be sinbee double staked. baker and/o~ slow growing
~rus shall be stoel staked,
&11 extsttng native spec4mn trees on the subject. proper~y shall be
preserved ~lr&bli feUlble, ~ theF cannot be preserved they sh·11 be
relocated or replaced with specteen trees as ap~,~vLd b7 ~he Planntng
Director. IMpl&cement trees shall be noted on approved landsc·ptng plans.
If the project ts to be phased, In'lot to the approval rr grading permits,
· n overall =~nca~tdal t plan shall be submitted to the Planning
Dtrector for ·pprova,~ad ~e plan abel1 as
be used · Fideline for
subsequent detatled gradtag plans for ted~vtdual phases of developmat and
shall tnclude the following:
2)
2)
Techniques which wilt be utfltzed to p~event eroston ·rid sedtmenUtton
durtn9 ·rid after the gradtrig process.
Approximte ttme frames for gradtag end Identification of areas which
my be graded during the higher probabtlt-ty rain mnths of aanuary
through Parch.
3) Preliminary pad and roadway elevations.
4) Areas of temporary Fading ouUtde of · particular phase.
~rior to the tssuance of grading pc-nits, the developer shall provtde
evidence to the Dtrector of Building and Safety that 811 adjacent
off-stte manufactured slopes have recorded slope easenears end that slope
mtntenance responsibilities have been assigned as ·pproved by the
Dire:tot of Bulldin9 and Safety,
Gradtag plans shall conform to Board adopted H~llstde Development .
Standards: A11 col: and/or fill 'Slopes, or .tndlvtdual combinations
thereof,-whlch exceed ten feet in verttcal hetghts shall be modified by an
appropriate combination of a spaeta1 tetraeta9 (benchtag) plan increase
s~ope ratto (~.e. 3:2), retaining walls, and/or slope planting combined
with Irrigation. All d!'ivN.yS shell not exceed · fifteen percent grade.
All cut slopes located adjacent ~o ungraded natoral terratn and exceeding
the grad4 ng bchni Was:
2) The angle of the Faded slope shall be gradually adjusted to the angle
of the natural terrain,
Conditions of Approval
Tental:tve Tract No.. 23103, Mended No. 1
Page 10
34.
2 ) Angular ferns she11 be discouraged. The graded form 'she11 raft act the
Mtural .. ~end~! terrain.
3) The toes nd tops of slopes shill be rounded vt~.h curves with radii
designed tn proportion to the tots1 Might of the slopes where
drstnage and ability pennif, such rounding.
4)
Idhero cut or fill slopes exceed 300 feet tn horizontal lenF~h, the-
horizontal mrs of the slope abel1 be curved in a continuous,
undulattng fashion.
Pr4or to the issuance of BUILDING PEM(3TS the folloe'ing conditions Shall
be satisfied:
Wtth to the submttUl of butlding plans to the Depa~tmen~ of B~tlding
and Safet~ the developer ~11 dangnarrate compliance with the
· acoustical study propared .for Tract 23:103 Mended No. 1 which
established appropriate mitigation measures to reduce ambient interior.
noise levels to 45 L.dn end exterior noise levels below 65 t.dn.
Building separa*.ton between all buildings including fireplaces shall
no*. be less than ten' (10) feet.
c. All street side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 10 feet.
In accordance with the written request of *.he developer to the Coun*.y of
Riverside, a copy of which ts on file, and in furtherance of the agre~.~ent
between the developer and the County of Riverside, no building permits
shall be issued by the County of Riverside for any parcels within the
sub)act tract until *.he developer, or the developer's
successors-in-interest provided evidence of compliance with the terms of
said Develo;nent Agreement No. 5 for the financing of public facilities.
Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shall
be satisfied:
Wall and/or fence locations shall substantially conform to attached
Figure III-28 of Specific Plan No. lgg Amendment No. 1. (AmenGad by
Planning Camassign 9-2B-gB)
All landsca tng and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with
epproved p~ans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits.
seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and
erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning
Dtre:tor and the Director of Building and Safety.
Tentative Tract Ito. Z3XO3. banded
Page 12
c. &11 landscalrlnl and
aplmoved plan~ and shall be vm'tfied b~ · Planntn9 De~ar'ment ~Jeld
d. Not vfthstam~ng the preceding mndttlens,tbe betghts of all requtred
~alls shall be deterfined IF/the acon~cal study ere appllcsble.
(~Concrete sSdmelks shall be ~:AsL,~cted throegamut the subdivision tn
accordance ,dth the standards of Ordinance 462 end $pedf~c Plan Ito.
299 ~kaenament lie, :X.
Street trees shall be planted thrmufhout the suMtvtston tn accordance
wrlth the standards of Ordinance 460 and Specific. Plan No. 199
Amendment No. 2
Develolnent of Tentative' Tract No. 23203 Amended ito.3 conform to shaql
comply k'tth the prortstons of $pedf~c FIle No, :~9g Ataendment No. 2 and.
DeVeloWnent AgfCU~nt No. S.
KG:mp
RIVERSIDE r.~)UNTY FLOOD C:~NTRC)L. AND
WATER C:~NBERVATIC)N DISTRI~'T
_"'v,_ "'- "-, . .~'~llilt
RIverside County
P1 anntng Departaent
County AdEintstrattve Center
Riverside, Ca1 tfornta
Attention: Iregloria1 Tsaa No. lie:
Area:
Ve have reviewed this cue and have the following moments:
Except for nuisance nitare local runoff vhtch ~ traverse portions of the
property the projec~ ts considered free from ordtner~ storm flood hazard.
However, m storm of ramsum1 magnitude could case lee damage. New construc-
tion should comply vtth all applicable ordinances.
The topography of the area consists of yell defined ridges and natural vater-
courses which traverse the .property. There ts adequate area outside of the
natural watercourses for building sties. The nlturel vatercotrses should be
kept free of buildings end obstructions in order to maintain the naturll
drainage patterns of the area sod to prevent flood damp to new buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental cons%taint sheet stating, "All new
buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of
28 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided
for mobile home supports."
This project is in the
drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance
regulations.
Area.
with the applicable r~les and
The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood
control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the
implied density.
The Distrtct's report dated ';ke I'7, (tl~ts still current for this p~oject.
The District does not object to the proposed minor change.
The attached comments apply. '
Ver~ truly yours,
ENNFrH'L. EDVARDS
Chief Engineer
JOHN H. KASHUBA
Senior Civil Engineer
DATE: $;ef(
Illlie' W';I'I'
I'*l, lgl sell
I"o' . ,I 'l II~l fitde
R~.verside CSmmt-y
F:1anning Department
ItSverse. de, Cal~forss.~a 92501
Fatby
ladies and Gentlemesa
Bet Tract 23:103
This ~s m propceLt ~ divide about 29 acres in the Temecula
Valley area. TIm sl~e ~e ~ ~ ws~ side of Bu~er~eld
S~ge hd, ~s ~ac~ ~s ~~ 2~2~c PI~ 199 for
~ dra~age plu ~s ~
Our review indicates that the area consists of wel:1 defined
r~dges and natural watercourses that ~raverse the property ~rom
the eas~ ~ the Must, The applicant proposes .~ accep~ ~hase
offsiue flows across Butter field Bugs P~ad w~th culverts and
dayligh~ the 'tim ~u their natural paths on the properry.
Ons~ue flows would be drained with sT_Tee~s.
Following 'are ~m DisTrict' s recmmnendaT~cnst
Th~s ~ract ks located within the lin~Lts of the Murr~eta
.Creek/Temecula Valley ~ea ~a~nage PI~ ~r v~ch
drainage ~es ~ve ~en adopted ~ t~ ~ard. ~a~nage
fees s~ll ~. ~id as set ~r~h ~der t~ prov~s~ons c~
t~-'Rules ~d Regularone ~or ~n~s~a~on o~ ~ea
~a~age PI~S', ~ded February 16, 19281
Drainage fees shall be pa~d ~ the Y~ad C~n~esioner
as part of the filing f~r record of t~ s~d~v~s~on
~n~ m~ or ~rcel map, cF ~ t~ recurring c~ a
~ ~rcel map ~s ~iv~, drainage ~es s~ll ~
~id as a ccnd~cn c~ t~ ~ver pr~or ~ reccrd~g
a ~fica~e of c~l~ance evidencing ~ ~ver of
~ ~cel map~ or
J~ tim c~on of the land d~v~der, upon f~ling a re-
oZ ~u, t~ dra~mge ~es my ~ ~d ~ ~ Bulld-
Og D~rec~r a~ ~ ~e of ~ssuance cf a grating
~t or b~ld~g ~t ~r each appr~ed
v~c~v~ my .~ ~rs~ ~~ed a~er ~ record~g
of ~'su~v~s~on ~nal mp or ~cel
~a, ~s o~on ~ de~ ~ fees my not
u~ssd ~r ~y ~cel w~e grating ~ s~uc~ss
Riverside C~un=y
Planning Depar:men=
Re: Tract 23103
1988
have been initiated cm the paxeel within t~e prior 3
year perimd, ~r permiU for e~amr activity have been
issued ~n tlmt ~reel whigh remain active-
Adequate ~nle~.s and om~eu should be ~ovide~ ~ t~
-~o~iaU n~~ of ~ ~v~U s~d ~ provi~e~-
3- Erosi~m ln~tec~i~n s~Duld. be in~vided ~g ~1 ~ ~11
slo~s w~ch ~e e~eed ~ ~ ~u~al ~osion
~zards.
of~y s~d ~ c~ined ~n ~aina9· easem~s
s~ ~ ~ 5n~ mP- A no~e s~uld ~ adde~ ~ ~he
final. mp sU=ing, '~a~age us~u s~ll ~ kep: ~ee
of buAldings and obs~uc~ons'-
B. Offs~e dra~sge ~c~li~es s~d ~ l~ca~e~ widen
publicly dedicated drainage eas~~ ob~ine~ ~om =he
affected prc~r=y ~ers. T~ doc~en~s s~uld ~ re-
corde~ an~ a copy su~i:=e~ ~ ~ Dis~ic= pri~r ~
recurdaUion of ~ ~al map.
6. ~1 lo=s shoul~ ~ graded ~ drain ~ t~ adjacen= s~ee=
or~ a~e~ua~e outle~-
7. The 10 Fear s=om flow shoul~ ~ con~aine~ wi=~n =~
c~b ~ t~ 100 year s=o~ flow xhoul~ ~ con~ine~
witch ~ s~ee~ right of ~y- ~n eider of ~se
criteria is exceeded. ad~i~onal drainage facilities
s~ul~ be insualled-
8. ~aina~e facili~es outletting .s~p conditions shoul~ ~
~esigne~ ~ conve~ t~ ~ibu=ary 100 ye~ s~m flows-
Ad~i~onal ~ergencY esca~ s~ul~'als~ be provided.
9. The pro~r=y's steer and lot gra~in~ s~ul~ ~ designed
in a m~ner t~ ~r~=ua~es =he existing natural
drainage ~==erns with respect ~ =ibu~ry drainage
area, cutle~ ~in=s ~ outlet condi~ons, o~rwise, a
drainage easement s~ul~ ~ ob~ined ~ t~ af~ec~e~
pro~r:M o~ers ~or ~ release of concenuaued cr di-
ver~e~ stom flows. A cow of t~ recorded drainage
easemen~ shoul~ ~ s~i==ed ~ ~ Dis~ic~ ~or revie~
prior ~ ~ recorda~on of t~ final map.
i~ve:s~de County
?Zanning ~epartnten*-,.
),el Tra=t 23X03
~une ~; ZgB8
Vary v:ulyy~urs,
cc:
Community Services
, ~ngineering, Znc ·
Civil Engineer
J
R 325-146-50
June 7, .3S88
4080 l,Ens:m Sr,,rm, hb F3.m=
l~ve:side, C:A 32503.
Re~ezen~e: TenU'-,~ve T:B:~. No. 233.03 - LCr. 1B
Varim ior Lc~ De~ i:o Width P.~
~e Ere :~ · variaran f:m the CUm~ c~ Riverside ~ :eg~d
~d~ 460, ~m 3'.8.~ i~ ~ 1B ~ ~u ~ ~- 33103,
l~y n~t ~gm~Dining these =wo lu:s, the area previously ~m u ~ 19 ~.~
impale ~ vir~y ~ 1~. ~ m'~ ~ini~ ~
~di~ 460.
TABnX you for you: l~.p ~n expecting ~l~.s miter.
Very ~ruly yuurs,
Rick Wiec:, mrlkxmrcmgh Develalxmn~
Bc~ Brink, Turrini ar~ Brink, P3.arming 'Cansul~
Riverside Coun1~. Planning Ca,mission
4080 Lemn Stret
Riverside. :J. S2SD1
OFFlI E OF RO4D CDIdldI~IONER & CDf,'NTY $URT'EYOR
· luly 22, Z988
Trl~ I11p Z,1103-- Amend
.. 5cMdule A - lea SP
Ladies and Gentlemen:
With respec~ ~o the conditions of approval for the referenced zenutive land
division tip, the Road Depll'~uent rectumends UIIt UIt -landdivider provide
fo114~inO street improvesent plans and/or roid dedications in accordance kith
Ordinance 460 and Riverside Count, Road hFrovmaenT'Standards (Ordinance 46~).
It is ~nderstood that the tentative tip c~, ~ccL1), shows accepuble cenTirline
profiles, all existing easements, traveled IdlySo and drainage courses kith
app:opriate Q's, and that their tiission or unacceptAbllt~y my require the tip
to be resulxnttted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the fo110kin9
conditions are essential parts and s requirenoel occurring in ONE is as binding
as though occurring in a11. They are intended to be complmu~_nTj~ and
describe the conditions for acomp3ete design of the improvement. All Questio-
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to TJ~e
Commi ssioner's Office.
The landdiVider shall protect downstream properties from damages
caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, I.e., concentra-.
lion of diversion of flow. i~'otectio~ sha31 be provided by
constructing adequate drainage faci3ities including enlarging
existing fac.ilities or by securing a drainage easement or by
both. All drainage easements shall be Shokm on the final map
and noted as follows: "l~ainage Easement - no I~tlding',
obstructions, or enc~oactnents by land ffils are Illoved". 'The
protection shall be as approved by the Road l)epar~ment..
The landdivider she1.1 accept and properly dispose of a11 offsite
drainage flowing onto or through the Site. In the event the
Road Commissioner peruits the use of streets for drainage
purposes, the provisions of Article XZ of Ordinance No, 460
will Ipply. Should the quantities exceed the street
capacity or the use of streets be prohtbtT~.d for drainage
purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage
facilities ss Ipproved by the bad Depa~lment.
2. ~:Jor drainage ls tnvolved on this landd.tvision and iF resolution
shall be as approved by the bad bpaFment.
4, k4:terfteld SUp Ilmai (including IDfD site) shall be improved
Width ~ dedicated .ri~t of. 13 in accordance vtth CounTry STAndard
leo. 2,00.
ace Street shall be t.;,ovsd .within the dedicated right of ray
accordonce Wi:h Coun~ SUndard k. ~3, bc~ion A. (44'/H').
6, °g' and "S' Streets shall be improved Within the dedicated right
of way 4n accordance With County Stlndard No, XI)4, Section A. (40'/
60*),
7. The landdivider v111 provide a ieh turn hue on Butterfield STAge
bad It the intersection with ICe and ii~m Sl;r~eT.s as approved by
the bad DeparmenT.,
The landdivider shall provide u'cil4~y clearance from PAncho (alif.
Hater Ns~'iCt prior to the recordslion of T~e final nap,
9. The toxinram centerline gradient shall not exceed
10. The minimum centerline radii shall be 300' or as approved by the
'i~oad I)epar'guenT..
The minimum lol;.fr~nTAgeS along the cul-de-sacs and knuckles shall
be 35 feet or as' approved t~y the bad Conunissioner,
~2. All driveways shall confor~ to the applicable Riverside County
STAndards.
k'~en blockwalls a~e ~equired to be constructed on top of slope, a
debris retention wall shall be constructed at the stree~ right of
way line to prevent; silting of sidewalks as approved by the bad
Comma ss i offer.
i
24. The minimum garage setback shill be 30 feet measured .from the face
of curb.'
:~5. Concrete sialelks sMll be constructed throughout *.he landdivision
In sccordaece Irlth ·2me1;, $taerd k. 400 and 40Z (curb sidewalk).
Prior to the recordstide of the final rap, the developer sial1
depostt ylth 1;M Ittverslde County bad i)elartmenT,, a cash sma of
$250.00 lOt'u mitigation.for traffic ;tgal bnpact. s. Should
the eve o~per me to defer the tim of pajme 1;, he ma~ enter into
d n
a rtttee agreement vtth the Coun~ defe~ing said paJmmnt to the
tim of issuance of · beildtag ;emit,
bnp~ovement plans shall be based upon · conferline iN'dills exT. ending
a minimum of 300 feet beJmM the Isro;jlct boundaries it a grade and
altgment as spp, o~.le I~ the Riverside Coun~ RDld Comissioner.
Completion of road improvements does not imply acceptance for
maintenance by County.
Electrical and cornrotations tr~l~'J~s shell be provided
accordance vtth Ordinance 46Z, Standard 827.
Aspbaltic mulston (fog seal) shell be applied not less than
fourteen days fo110kring placement of the asphalt sunwactn9 and shall
be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square .vard. Asphalt
emulsion shall conform to Sections 37, 39 and 94 of the ST, tie
Standard Speci 1tic·lions.
20. S~an~ard cul-de-Sacs and O~f-Set cul-de-sacs shall be constructed
throughout the landd~viston.
Corner cutbacks in confore·nee vith County S1;andanl No. 805 s1~111
be sho~n on the ~rinal sip and offered-for dedication.
Lot access shall be restricted on Butterfield Stage Road and so
noted on 1:he f-teal map.
Landdivisions c~eattng cut or fill slopes adjacent to the streets
:hall IN'ovide e~oston control, sight distance control and slope
easements as approved by the Road Deparment.
All centerline intersections shall be at 90® vith a mininwJm 50'
tangent tonsured from 1r1 ov 1 ine.
Z:'ZIt,EZZ)D~A!CTME]~
IN T:: E rE&:.llON Wff141'HE
G&LJIL'ORNMDEPARTMEIGDFFONGTRY
it,4kT~
FiIEC21i~
233.03
~lOldmmmi~em. lmae II
J
rich respect to the eoadicSoae of '%F,-,al for the above referenced Zand d~v~sZon,
the F~Fe 13mparcaenc reek -,,,as the foJ~mrJII flze protection manwee be provided
in accordance Vi-k u4vere~de County Ord4,,-,.,--- and/or recolu~sed firs protection
Flee PXOTECrION
Schedule ace f4re protection approved 'standard f4re ~drmncs, (6ez4"x2|w) located
one ac each street interescc4on and spaced uo more than 660 feet apart in any
d~rtction, v~th no portion of any lot fronta2e more than 330 feet frou's hydrant.
l~LnJJnum fire floe shall he 500 CPH for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI.
Applicant/developer shall furnish out copy of the racer e~steuplans to the
F~re Deparcment for revZev. Plan· shall conform to f~re hydrant types, locatic
and spacing, and, the sys:en shall ames the fire floe requirements. Plans shall
be siZned/approved by a re2~sEered civil sniPnear and the ~ocal ~atsr company
~lch the folioring cerc~icac~on: "I certify thac the desiZn of the uater system
is In accordance vith the requ:rements prescribed by the Kiverside County Fire
Dept.'
The required rarer-system includin2 fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted
by the appropriate va~ar aZancy pr~or to any combustible buildSriB mattr~al bciu~
placed on an individual lot.
~ZTZCATION FEE~
Pr~ar to the recordscion of C'he f~nal mp, the developer shall deposit v~th
the riverside County Firs Department · cash sum of $&0O.0O per lot/uric as
for f~re protection Aspacts. Should the developer choose Co defer the time
of payment, he may enter into · vritten agreement v~th the Counc~ deferring
said payment to the c4ue of ~ssuanct of s bulldin2 permit.
k!l questions relardin2 zhe meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the
Y~re Department Planning and EnZ~neerin/staff.
IAYI4~ND R.
Chief Fire 1)epsrtmeut Planner
Gentle Tatus, IMptoy Fire Harehal
The s~reet design and isrovemen~ concep~ of ~hts project shall
coordinated ~lth TR Z320D, TR Z3201 and SP 299.
Street lighting slu]l be required tn accordance with' Ordinance 460
End 462 throuFmu~ the subdivision. The County service Area (CSA)
Administrator deTaradnes ear this ssl qu<fies under
existing use··meet district o? not. ~t, the lind owner shall
file an application tilth LAFI:O for annshiloh. into or creation of
· 'Lighting Assure·fit District' tn accordance wtl:h Gove~men~al
Code Section 56000.
ZT. All pPtvs~e and INMtc entrances and/or intersections opposite this
PPo:lect shall be coordtnolad utth this project and sho~ on the
street talwovem~t plsns.
28. A strtptn~ plan t· required for BuSterfield Ste~e
signing end striping shall be done by CounTy forces krith
t ncuP~ed cos1:· bo~ne b.v the ippltcanl;.
The landdivider shall comply vith this deparment's Peco~nendations
for $P 299 u out1 inad in our letter dated ~lune 20 2988.
Very T, ru'iy yours.
had D'iv'ision Engineer
_j
4080 Z,eem~ it, reeL
R~versmde..Cl 92502
· 'RIVERSIDE COUNTY
P~ANNING DEPARTMENT'
~-,m.. u mzaz~
moo mama g'~mIS I1.
MIIll
J
Xttn: XaLAy 6if ford
leE; Tract Map 23103;-Being a portion of the Ranthe Tamecult
9rknted W the Ooverfuaent of the U~ited States of America to
~uxs Vagnes by patent dmted 3&nuLry 18, 1860, and recorded
xn the Office of the County Recorder of San Dxeg~ County.
CalSfornda zn Book 1 of psiwrits at PaCe 37 and m por~don of
the Rancho Psuba Government of the United States of Amersca
toLuzs V~Fnes by pmtenL dmted 3&nuiry. 39, 1860 end recorded
2n ~he of[~ce o[ the S&~ D~ego Co~L~ Recorder ~ book J st
rape 45.
(29 Lots)
Gentlemen:
The ~epartment of Public Health has revieved Tentatxve Hap
No. 23X03 and recommends ~hat:
A valet system shall be Installed according'to
plans and specification as approved by the vaLeT
company and the Health Z:)epartment. Permanent
prandts of the plans of the rarer system shall
be submatted an trzplicate. vith a mariamum scale
not less thafi one Anch equals 200 feet. along vlth
the original driving to the County Surveyor. The
prints shall shov the internal pipe diameter.
location of valves and fire hydrants; pmpe and
joint specifications. and the size of the mAIn
at the 3gTaCtiOfl Of the nev system to the
exxlting system. The plans shall comply in
all respects vith Day. S. Part 1. Chapter ? of
the California Health and Safety Code. Callfornxa
Adm~nxstratxve Code. Title 32. Chapter 32. and General
Order No. 303 of the Public Utilltxes Commxssxon of the
State of California. vhen applxcable.
R~versade County PA&nningZiepL,
P&pe Two
Apr~ IS. XBa8
The piins sh&X~ be siOned by a realstored engineer and
ester cospiny wills the roA2ovzng cert~fzcsL~on: 'I
certify that the detz~ of the wter system z~ Tract
Nap 231'03 is in accordace vZ~ ~e vales sysLe~
&~ Lh&t the wLer seaice,storage ~
system vii2 be &deq~te Lo pr,ide valor service Lo
~y specific ~utit~es', f~ovs or pressures got fare
proLec~Su or ~ o~er ~rpose'. ~is cerL~/~c&LZon
sh&~ be si~ ~ 8 resp~ltble oF/tc~&~ of ~e wiles
comply. ~ ~l-ns n~ !~tt~ed~bi_~B~_
&R_~bi_~t~Vest
This Department has a statement from the l;tancho CalleDmat
~ate.r Dastract agreeing to serve domeitic valor to each
every lot an the subdivision on demand preySdang
satisfactory fanancaaI arrangements are completed with the
subdivider. It viii be necessary for the financaal
arrangements to he made praor to the recordsrich or the
Th'=s Department has a statement frem the Eastern NLrAicapaJ
~a~er Distract agreean.o L~ &lAcy the suJod3vlsion sewage
system to be connecteel Lo the sewers or the District. The
sever s~ste~ sha~A be. installed accordinG: LD plans and
speck/stations as approved by the Distract. the County
Surveyor and the Health Department. Permanent prints of ~he
p~ans of the sever systma shal2 be tubmatted xn triplicate.
&~on; w~th the craganal driving, to the County Surveyor. The
prints sha~J show the :nternal pipe diameter. location of
manholes. complete profiles. pipe and 3cant specafacaLaons
an= the size of ~he sewers at ~he 3uricamen of
to ~he existing system. A single past indacating location
of sewer Alums and vatmr lines shall be a portton of the
sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be sapned by
registered engineer and the sewer district va~h
following certification: "! certify that the destan of-the
sewer system in Tract Hap 23103 is in accordance with the
sewer system expansion plans of the [Astern ~uAacipal Water
Distract and that the rifle disposal system ts adequate at
this time to trmmt the ~ticipttmd vastms from the proposed
tract."
~nvironmenL&l. H e<~ Serv3ces
SH:L&c
RidsmiD. etafleX
James A. Dmiy
St. VfPmsbet
Dour Kalbeq
Jou A, Idmi
Jeff,eY L, Midde
T.C. bee
ELan T. M~
Phillip I, Forbes
Du~'~r of Fm
~omen ~ Thorns'
D~ ~ ~
. ~o~ R.
B~ ~.~
D~ ~
Ruwm ud
Oune 1E, 1988
Etverside Coun -Pl =
d010 Lemon SV. ree~, Dram floor
eater avallabt t a'
"'::"=
Please be advised =bat ~a~e above-referen:ed
property ~s located w~T. hin ~he boundaries of Rancho
California Water D~s~.v~. Water service, ~herefore,
would be available upon completion of financial
arrang~anen~s between RCWD and ',,he proper~y o~rner-
Water availability vould.be con~ingen~ upon =he
property owner signing an Agengy Agreement which
assigns water management r~ghts, if any, ~o RCWD.
If RCWD :an be o~ fuzz-her seTvice =o you, pl' ~
con=a:~ T. his office. '~
Very truly yours,
RANCH0 CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Senga P- Doher~y
Engineering Services Representative
3~ANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DIS'I
_*,ec~ DI.~.Z ROAD · POST OFFICE BOX 1'74 * TEME~ CA ~239o-or74 · ci,14) 6'76-41ol · FAX
N[unicipa[ 'V/axer Dis ri:
Aprfl 15, 1588
Riverside County Planntng Department
4080 Le~ $Zreet, 9th Floo~
Riverside, C. lllfornta ;ZSQ1
__',%~;*-'.. ~.-. . o..
PLA|:2L".~'
SUB~,CT: YEST2N; TP~CT z3203
The Disr, rtct ts responding to your request for r. mments on the suU~)ect
pro~)ec~(s) relative to the provision otr wmte~ and sewer service. The items
checked below apply to this pro~ect raytaw.
The subjec~ project:
ZS not ulthin EXWZ)'s:
X uster seryt ce area
sewer serYtce area
!~s~ be annexed to :his Dis~rict's 2mprovemen~ Dis~ri:: ltD.__ in oraer
to be eligible to receive domestic wa~er/sanitary sewer service.
will be r~quir~d to const~ct the following facilities:
a. ) Water S.e~vice
b.) Se~r Service Cainants w~re submitted to Riverside Co. (Feb.,
lS, 1988) regarding SP 199 - Am II. Thts ts U ~tterate those coshis t~t
se~rs a~ ~ ~ ~rmvity, ~gionally'sized and no se~rs ~11 ~ mll~d m
~ivate lands, or along lot lines. They a~ to ~ tn steers.
REDLINID TO I~OW · "-'
Trao~ ~3~G3, ~he ~t~ ~ed ~ha~ u~C dspo~i~ vi~ Us Cit~
O s~r~ot~ ~o o~ '~s ~s~ and ~'~rYl Of oons~~
t ~lon of ~~lsld hgs am ~a~ vi~/n ~ot 33Z03,
~e~o, C~2ud~ng, vi~o~ l~ation, ~0 payrant, ~b, ~~s
' ' ' ' ~~i~ ilLforAYs generally
d. and nU~vs Tract Hap ~3~09 on ~41, w~th
y-Six Dollars (138,006.00)
~lating ~c ~e construc~ion an~
ATTACHMENT 6
AGREEMENT FOR DEPOSIT AND
REIMBURSEMENT OF FUNDS FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
THIS IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made effective the'
day of , 1993 by and between Marlborough
Development Corporation, a California corporation ("MDC") and the
City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City").
RECITALS:
A. MDC owns that certain real property located in the City
of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California which is more
particularly depicted .and described on Tentative Tract Map 23103
("Tract 23103") on file with the City;
B. As a condition of approval for recording the final map
for Tract 23103, the City required that MDC deposit with the City
funds sufficient to cover the costs and expenses of constructing
that portion of Butterfield Stage Road located within Tract 23103,
as more particularly depicted and described on Exhibit "A" attached
hereto, (including, without limitation, the pavement, curb, gutters
and all other road improvements related to such portion of
Butterfield Stage Road as shown on the Improvement Plans for
Butterfield Stage Road on file with the City) (collectively the
"Road Improvements"); and
C. The Road Improvements will likely be constructed by the
owner of that certain real property located in the City of
Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California generally
depicted and described on Tentative Tract Map 23209 on file with
the City (the "Adjacent Property") as a condition of development of
the Adjacent Property. The Adjacent Property is generally depicted
on Exhibit "B" attached hereto. The conditioning of the Adjacent
Property to construct the Road Improvements will require compliance
with legal. .procedures and public hearings accompanied by
discretionary decisions. The City acknowledges that nothing
contained in this Agreement shall be construed as a pre-commitment
or requirement that the City Planning Commission or City Council
condition any discretionary actions regarding the Adjacent Property
on constructing the Road Improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing
Recitals and the mutual covenants set forth herein, the parties
hereby agree as follows:
1. Acknowledgementof Receipt of Funds. The City hereby
acknowledges receipt from MDC of the sum of Thirty-Eight Thousand
Sixty-Six Dollars ($38,066.00) as payment in full for all costs
relating to the construction and installation of all of the Road
Improvements (the "MDC Payment"). The parties acknowledge and
agree that the MDC Payment was calculated using the following: (a)
the construction items and quantities submitted by MDC and approved
-- I{~725.006-MDC~GMTS\1000.002-1/20/93 i
by 'the City; and (b) the "City of Temecula's Unit Costs" as
established by the City. A copy of the "City of Temecula
Engineering Department Construction Security Worksheet. is attached
hereto as Exhibit "C".
2. Satisfaction of Condition of APproval. The parties
understand and agree that receipt by the City of the MDC Payment
satisfies the condition of approval for recording the final map for.
Tract 23103 that MDC deposit funds sufficient to pay the costs of
constructing the Road Improvements. In accordance with said
condition of approval, the City may use the MDC Payment as the
City, in its sole discretion, determines necessary and appropriate
for constructing the Road Improvements, (including, but not limited
to, contributing the MDC Payment to an assessment district or
reimbursing the developer of the Adjacent Property). MDC hereby
waives and releases.any claim it may now or hereafter have for a
refund of any portion of the MDC Payment in the event such Payment
exceeds the actual costs of constructing the Road Improvements.
The City agrees that the MDC Payment constitutes payment in full by
MDC and that MDC shall not have any further obligation whatsoever
regarding the construction of the Road Improvements (including, but
not limited to, paying or contributing monies in excess of the MDC
Payment, performing any work or providing any services).
3. General Provisions.
(a) Entire AGreement. This Agreement constitutes the
entire agreement between the parties hereto pertaining to the
subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior negotiations,
discussions and understandings between the parties. No amendment
or modification hereof shall be binding or enforceable unless set
forth in writing and executed by both parties hereto.
(b) Enforcement. Each of the parties hereto may enforce
by proceedings at law or in equity, the terms and provisions of
this Agreement, including, without limitation, the right to
prosecute a proceeding, at law or in equity, against the party who
has violated, or is attempting to violate, any of said terms and/or
provisions, to enjoin or prevent it from doing so, to cause said
violation to be remedied and/or to recover damages for said
violation.
(c) Attorney's Fees. In the event a legal action is
filed between the parties to enforce the terms and provisions
hereof, to declare rights hereunder or to resolve any controversy,
claim or dispute regarding the terms and provisions of this
Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from
the losing party its costs of suit, including reasonable attorneys'
fees, as may be fixed by the court.
(d) Waiver. The failure to enforce any term or
provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of the
0725.006-MDC~GMTS\ 1000.002- I/20/93 2
right to enforce the same term of provisions, or any other term of
provision, thereafter. No waiver of any provision of this
Agreement shall be deemed or shall constitute a waiver of any other
provision herein (whether or not similar), nor shall such waiver
constitute a continuing waiver unless otherwise expressly provided;
(e) Severability. If any clause, sentence or other
portion of this Agreement shall be held by any court of competent
jurisdiction to be unenforceable for any reason, the remaining
portions hereof shall remain in full force and effect.
(f) Cooperation. Each party hereto agrees that it will
promptly execute and deliver any and all documents and perform any
acts reasonably necessary to effectuate the terms and provisions of
this Agreement.
(g) Notice. Any notice required or permitted by this
Agreement to be given by either party, shall be in writing and
shall be personally served or shall be sent by certified or
registered mail, postage prepaid to the address shown below until
notice of a different address is given. Any notice given by
certified or registered mail deposited with the U.S. Postal Service
shall be deemed received two (2) business days after the date such
mail is postmarked.
"MDC"
MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
100 Bayview Circle, Suite 2000
Newport Beach, California 92660
Attention: Emile Haddad
"CI TY"
CITY OF TEMECULA
Attention:
(h) Binding Effect. The terms and provisions of this
Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the
parties hereto and their respective successors, assigns and
grantees.
(Signatures to Follow)
-" 10725.006-MDC~AGMTS\I000.002_I/20/93 3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have made this Agreement
effective as of the day and year first written above.
MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,
a Califor ia co. pora '
B: ~ ~
YT'
By:.
CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal
corporation
Name:
City Engineer
By:
ATTEST:
J. Sal Munoz
MAYOR.
Approved As To Form:
By:
'June S. Greek
City Clerk
By:
Scott F. Field
City Attorney
10725.006-MDC'~AGMTS~,I000.002-1f20~)3 4
EXHIBIT "B"
DePiction and Description of the Adjacent PropertV
" mT~S.OO6-MDCX~OMTSUOOO.OO~.U20/9S Page '1 of I Page
EXHIBIT "C'
City of Temecula Engineering Department
Construction Security Worksheet
(See Attached)
Page 1 of 1 Page
ATTACHMENT 7
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
'CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT MAP NO. 23103
IMPROVEMENTS
Streets and DPainage
Water
Sewer
TOTAL
DATE: January 12, 1993
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
SECURITY
$ 1,873,500.00 $
$ 462,500.00 $
$ 343,500.00 $
$ 2,679,500.00 $
MATERIAL & LABOR
SECURITY
'937,000.00
231,500.00
172,000.00
1,340,500.00
*!htmmmm ktw---- (lS% fw me lmr)
267,950.00
Monument Security
Street Improvement( Offsite)Development Fees
Fire Mitigation Fee
RCFC Drainage Fee Due-to be determined.
(Due Prior to Grading Permits)
Signalization Mitigation Fee - SMD #
Road and Bridge Benefit Fee
Other Developer Fees (Quimby)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
58,740.00
38,066.00
83,200.00
0.00
31,200.00
0.00
20,700.00
Planning Department Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan Fee
Plan Check Fee
Inspection Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
$
$
$
$
$
316,00
8.00
87,662.00
78,978.00
2,937.50
Total Inspection/Plan Check Fees
Less Fees Paid To Date (Credit)
Total Inspection/Plan Check Fees Due
$
$
$
169,901.00
169,901.00
-0-
ITEM
NO.
5
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER ~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
A GENDA REPORT
City Council
David F. Dixon
February 9, 1993
Balloon & Wine Festival
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the City's participation in the 1993
Balloon. & Wine Festival. The City of Temecula's participation will be in the amount
of $10,000 for advertisement in the official program.
STAFF REPORT:
The City was approached by the sponsorship chairman of the 1993 Balloon & Wine
Festival recently and asked if we would participate in a sponsorship package which
includes advertising in the official program. The costs associated with this program
sponsorship ranges from $2,500 to $50,000. I.am recommending that the City
approve a sponsorship of $10,000. The $10,000 sponsorship will provide the City
with name/logo on all print ads, name on letterhead, full page black & white ad in the
official program, name/logo on flyers, balloon banner, booth space, pre-festival
sponsor party, four VIP passes, preferred VIP parking permits, eight festival general
admission tickets.
FINANCIAL IMPA C T:
The funding for this program will be appropriated from the 1993 Marketing Campaign
account.
ITEM NO. 6
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICE~
CITY MANAGER.
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Council/City Manager
i~.t,~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
February 9, 1993
SUBJECT:
Substitution of Improvement Bonds in Tract 23267-1
PREPARED BY:
Albert K. Cris P,~;rmit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council .accept Surety Bonds for the improvement of streets, and sewer and
water systems, and survey monumentation in Tract No. 23267-1 as substitutes for bonds
submitted to the City Council on October 22, 1991 and to direct the City. Clerk to release the
original bonds.
BACKGROUND:
On October 22, 1991, the City Council approved Final Revised Vesting Tract Map No. 23267-
1 and entered into subdivision agreements with:
The Presley Companies
15010 Avenue of Science, Suite 201
San Diego, CA 92128
for the improvement of streets, and sewer and water systems, and survey monumentation.
The bonds on file were furnished by American Motorists Insurance Company:
CATEGORY
Streets
Water System
Sewer System
Survey Monuments
BOND NUMBER
3SM 771 447 O0
3SM 771 447 00
3SM 771 447 00
3SM 771 448 00
FAITHFUL
PERFORMANCE
AMOUNT
$906,000
9102,500
9111,000
Total = 91,119,500
919,470
MATERIAL &
LABOR
AMOUNT
9453,000
951 ;500
955,500
9560,000
-1- pwOl\agdrpt%93%0209%23267.1 0128
While the streets and related improvements are not being accepted at this time, the streets
within the subdivision are Corte Carolina, Corte Bella Donna, and a portion of Redhawk
Parkway, Via Cordoba, and Corte Zorita.
BOND NUMBER
111 2710 2791
111 2710 2791
111 2710 2791
CATEGORY
Streets
Water System
Sewer System
Survey Monuments 111 1925 7167
FAITHFUL
PERFORMANCE
AMOUNT
$906,000
$102,500
$111,000
Total -- $1,119,500
$19,470
MATERIAL &
LABOR
AMOUNT
$453,000
$51,500
$55.500
$560,000
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments:
Surety Bonds
Vicinity Map
-2- PwO1%sgdrpt%93\0209%23267.1 0128
· CORTE ZORITA
C. oRTE. r_.~EIGTIKIA
TRACT NO 23267- I
ITEM
NO.
7
APPROVAT.
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICF~~
CITY NANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
/~,pTim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works\City Engineer
February 9, 1993
Solicitation of Construction Bid for the Installation of e Traffic Signal at
Margarita Road and La Serene Way (PW92-06)
PREPARED BY:
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the
Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the traffic signal at
Margarita Road and La Serena Way upon receiving Caltrans approval.
BACKGROUND:
On May 26, 1992 the City Council approved the agreement for professional traffic engineering
services with J. F. Davidson Associates. One of the professional traffic engineering services
that J. F. Davidson Associates provided was the design of the traffic signal at the intersection
of Margarita Road and La Serena Way. On January 12, 1993 the City Council approved the
installation of a 3-way stop to provide an interim measure prior to the traffic signal
installation.
The plans, specifications and contract documents have been completed and the project is
ready to be advertised for construction bids. The project includes installation of a three-way
traffic signal and appurtenances. Staff is presently in the process of obtaining authorization
to bid from Caltrans with bids being solicited upon receiving Caltrans approval. The
engineer's estimate for the project is $90,200.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project is being funded through the Federal FY 1991/1992 Surface Transportation Program
(STP). STP funds have been allocated in the amount of $115,000 for this project which will
be administered by Caltrans.
pwO4%egdrpt%92~O209~pw92-O6.bid O129
ITEM
NO.
8
APPROVAL
ITY ATTORNEY ~
~INANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
f~Jim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works\City Engineer
February 9, 1993
Solicitation of Construction Bid for the Installation of a Traffic Signal at
Winchester Road (Hwy. 79N) and Margarita Road (PW92-08)
PREPARED BY: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the construction plans and specification and authorize the
Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the traffic signal inst'allation
at Winchester Road (Hwy. 79N) and Margarita Road upon receiving Caltrans approval.
BACKGROUND:
On May 26, 1992 the City Council approved the agreement for professional traffic engineering
services with J. F. Davidson Associates. One of the professional traffic engineering services
that J. F. Davidson Associates provided was the design of the traffic signal at the intersection
of Winchester Road (Hwy. 79N) and Margarita Road. .
The plans, specifications and contract documents have been completed and the project is
ready to be advertised for construction bids. The project includes installation of a four-way
signal that will be interconnected with all signals east of I-15. Staff is presently in the process
of obtaining all' the necessary approvals and permits from Caltrans with bids being solicited
upon receiving Caltrans approval. The engineer's estimate for the project is $122,700.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project is being funded through the Federal FY 1991/1992 Surface Transportation Program
(STP). STP funds have been allcoated in the amount of $150,000 for this project which will
be administered by Caltrans.
pwO4\agdrpt%92%O209%pw92-O8.bid 0 128
ITEM
NO. 9
APPROV/~r.
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
/~t~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
February 9, 1993
Contract Amendment No. 3 to Community Facilities District 88-12 (Ynez
Corridor) Engineering Services Contract with J.F. Davidson Associates,
Inc.
PREPARED BY: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Approve Contract Amendment No. 3 to provide additional engineering services for CFD 88-12
by J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. in the amount of $17,151.
BACKGROUND:
The additional costs detailed in the following section were arrived at during the design
coordination process with several of the property owners within the District, utility companies
serving the District, and the landscape consultant:
JeeplChrysler Driveway Relocation: An existing center staged driveway was required
to be relocate to the southern property line at the Jeep/Chrysler dealership (Solana
Way and Ynez Road) due to the on-site improvements.
Revisions to Plans, Specifications, and Estimates:
$3,646.00
-1- pwO4~egdrpt~,92~O209%CFD88-12.Ad3 020193
5~
Toyota Dealerdlp Driveway and Median Opening: The existing entrance driveway was
required to be relocated from northern property line to a center type entrance due to
the on-sito improvements. Revisions to the median island design was needed to
accommodate the driveway relocation.
Revisions to the street and striping plans,
estimate and specifications:
e5,570.00
Loffiestein Wall Alternative Coordination: This item considers the additional
management and coordination time required to accommodate a retaining wall
alternative along the east side of Ynez Road between Solana Way and the north end
of the project. This alternative was requested by the City as a result of consultation
with the Alhambra Group who is designing landscaping improvements along the Ynez
corridor.
Revisions to the specification and bid proposal
along with coordination meeting time:
$1,640.00
Tomand Storm Drain Re-Design: During the course of designing the proposed retaining
wall system along the east side of Ynez Road between Solana Way and the north end
of the project, the existing storm drain system originally constructed to accommodate-
the Tomand project was found to be in conflict with the proposed footings of the wall
system. A re-design of two laterals of that existing system was required to lower their
profiles so that 'they would not be in conflict with the proposed footings. An additional
sheet to the storm drain plans was required.
Revisions to the plans, specifications and estimate:
$2,730.00
ACS Project: The ACS on-site improvement project constructed a new driveway
entrance at Ynez Road and underground water vaults within the right-of-way of Ynez
Road. Therefor, the plans were required to show this new driveway as an existing
improvement that was to join the widened Ynez Road. The new water vaults that
were also installed needed to be located and checked for compatibility to the Ynez
Road plans.
Plan revisions:
$700.00
Toyota of Temecula Project: The project began construction after the design work
started and constructed driveway improvements to existing Ynez Road. The design
had to incorporate the new improvements and address a new driveway connection that
was previously not included in the original scope of work.
Plan revisions and surveying:
$1,405.00
-2- PwO4%agdrpt%92%0209%CFD88-12.Ad3 020193
Paradise Chevrdet Project: The Paradise Chevrolet project constructed certain
improvements along Ynez that had to be added to the plans and were needed to be
verified in the field. A drainage channel was also constructed that drained into Ynez,
Road that was not apart of the original design. Extra design details showing the
connection to the channel and a sidewalk drainage culvert was added to the plans.
The new sign and water vaults. of the Paradise Chevrolet project were also field
surveyed to verify locations and to ensure that they did not conflict with the proposed
widening.
Plan revisions and field investigation:
$700.00
Automobile Servicing Center (adjacent to Toyota of Temecula): The Automobile
Servicing Center installed new water vaults in Ynez Road that required J. F. Davidson
to field investigate their locations and to place these utilities structures onto the plans.
Plan revisions and field investigation:
$230.00
Nissan Dealer Site:
The Nissan Dealer installed a new sign in front of their development. Upon verifying
its location, J. F. Davidson found it to be in conflict with the proposed retaining wall
system. Therefore, design revisions to the retaining wall had to be performed.
Plan revisions and field investigation:
$530.00
Total of Items 1 - 9:
$17,151.00
FISCAL IMPACT:
All of the above costs are eligible for funding through Community Facilities District 88-12.
Adequate funds have been reserved within budget of the District. The total cost of this
element of the project is summarized below:
A. Original Contract (Approved 12-18-90) $431,275.00
B. Amendment No. 1 (Approved 8-27-91) $56,100.00
C. Amendment No. 2 (Approved 6-23-92) $53,434.00
D. Proposed Amendment No. 3 $17,151.00
Total $557,960.00
-3- pwO4%e0drpt%92%0209%CFD88-12.Ad3 020193
ITEM NO. 10
APPROVAL
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
February 9, 1993
SUBJECT:
Final Parcel Map 25212
PREPARED BY: ~ Dennis Armstrong, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That City Council approve Final Parcel Map No. 25212 subject to the Conditions of Approval.
BACKGROUND:
Tentative Parcel Map No. 25212, along with Change of Zone No. 5663, was approved by the
City Council on December 11, 1990.
There is an application for a First Extension of Time that was filed on November 9, 1992 that
would extend the expiration date of the Tentative Parcel Map No. 25212 to December 11,
1993, but due to the timely filing of the application, the expiration date of the Tentative Map
will be automatically extended for 60 days under Section 66463.5, Paragraph (c) of the
Subdivision Map act. During this 60-day period, the Final Parcel Map ma~/record without the
City Council acting on approval of the Extension of Time.
Final Parcel Map No. 25212 is a four-parcel residential development located at the northeast
corner of the intersection of Nicolas Road and Liefer Road. The subdivision is creating four
one-acre parcels and the Change of Zone. No. 5663 will allow a residential dwelling on a one-
half acre lot. The development currently has one existing residential dwelling on one of the
one-acre parcels and the remaining parcels are undeveloped.
The following fees have been paid (or deferred) for Final Parcel Map No. 25212:
Area Drainage Fees
(Deferred to Grading Permits)
Fire Mitigation Fees
$ 0
1,200
Traffic Signal Fees
Stephen's K-Rat Fees
(Deferred to Grading Permits)
450
0
-1- PwO1%agdrpt%93%O209~25212 0203
The following bonds have been posted for Final Parcel Map No. 25212: --
Streets and Drainage
Water
Sewer
Survey Monuments
Faithful Performance
~ 46,011
1,500
0
Other Bonds
3,500
Labor & Materi~s
$ 23,005
750
0
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments:
.1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Development Fee Checklist
Location Map
Copy of Map
Conditions of Approval
Fees and Securities Report
-2- pwO 1%agd~pt%93\0209%25212 0203
ATTACHMENT 1
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CITY OF TEM!~
DEVEX)PMENT F]~ CH~C~-TST
Fin,~ Pa.-.cel Mal~ No. 25212
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to thi~
project.
Fee
Habitat Conservation Plan
(K-Rat)'
Public Facility Fee
Traffic Signal Mitigation Fee
Fire Mitigation Fee
Flood Control Fee
Area Drainage Plan (ADP)
Regional Statistical Area
(RSA)
Conctition of ADD{oval
Condition No. 15
Condition No. 41
· Condition No. 9. a
See Riverside Co. Road Dept.
letter dated 5 ] 07 ] 90
Condition No. 10
See Fire DepartmentLetter Dated
3/09/90.
Condition No. 9 & 35.
See Riverside County Flood
Control Letter Dated 3/28/90
N/A
Staff Findings:
Staff finds that the project will be consistent with the City's General Plan once
adopted.
The project is not a part of a specific plan.
ATTACHMENT 2
LOCATIONMAP
SAHTA
ATTACHMENT 3
COPY OF MAP
.4::
P.M. ]129 / 53 - 54
27e.42' [27e.,4'] -'~ .~i7.5'T [~07.53']
H3f)~54-w
LOT "B"
295.0O'
LIEFER ROAD
PA~. 37
P.M. 1 / 44
ATTACHMENT 4
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Mayor
~Ron Parks
Mayor Pro Tem
Karel F. Lindemans
CITY OF TEMECULA
P.O. Box 3000
Ternecula, California 92390
(714) 694-1989
FAX (714) 694-1999
Councilmembers
Patricia H. Birdsall
Peg Moore
J. Sal Mu~ioz
December 13, 1990
Steve Doulames
23769 Five Tribes Trail
Murrieta, California 92362
SUBJECt': Parcel Map No. 25212/Change of Zone 5663
Dear Sirs:
On December 11, 1990 the City Council approved Parcel Map 25212 and Change of
Zone 5663 subject to the enclosed Conditions of Approval.
The application is a proposed subdivision of 5.02 acres into four (/4) parcels and to
change the existing R-R 2.5 Zoning to R-R-1. The project is located at the
northeast corner of Nicolas and Lielet Roads.
This approval is effective until December 11, 1992 unless extended in accordance
with Ordinance q60, Section 8.q. Written request for a time extension must be
submitted to the City of Temecula a minimum of thirty (30) days prior to the
expiration date.
If you have any further questions regarding this subject, please contact the
Planning Department at (714) 69zl-6~400.
Steve Padovan
Case Planner
~i II~~
Planning Director
SP/GT: mb
PLANNING\L45
MEMORANDUM '
TO:
FROM:
DATE;
SU BJ'ECT:
City Manager/City Council
Gary Thornhill, Planning Director
Douglas M. Stewart, Deputy City Council
December 6, 1990
Parcel Map No. 25212/Change of Zone No. 5663
The following conditions have been revised as agreed upon by the City Council at the
November 27, .1990 scheduled hearing:
Condition No. 16 Shall Read:
"Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the
development standards of the R-R zone. The minimum lot size shall be
one ( 1 ) acre gross."
Condition No. 2q Shall Read:
· 'Liefer Road shall be improved with 22 feet of half street improvement
plus one 12' lane, or bond for the street improvement may be posted per
Condition No; 26, within a 33' dedicated right-of-way in accordance
with County Standard No. 103, Section A (eP4'/66') minus sidewalks and
street lights. County Condition Nos. 5 and 13 shall be deleted."
SP:ks
PLANNING\M53
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Parcel M~p No. 25212
· Council Approval Date:
EXPiration Data:
Planninq DePartment
to attack, set aside, void or annul an
advisory agencies al~;~ boards or 'ai'afar°'val of the City of Temecula its
...,-., ,.. o,o...,,, ...,o.
~,., ,.,,. ,o ,,..,.,,~ ..,,,, ,...,~L.::=. ,-,,~ ,. ,.. ~..=. ,, ~
The tentative parcel m~p shal| conform to the requlrementsof Ordinance
Schedule H unless modified by the conditiofis listed beN. This aloloro~N
tentative parcel maf~ wiLL expire two years. after the Planning Con~
approval date unless extend~ as provided by OrdirmnCe q60.
The final map shall be Prepared by a r ist · · .
· "erside county Su~a~l~visio~ Or ' California Subdivision
pact Riv . dlSr~~O' .
All road easements sha~ be offered for dedication to the public and shall
Easements, whe~ required for roadway slopes, drairNs9e facititicEs, utilities,
etc., shall be shown on the final m~ if within the land division boundary. All
offers of dedication shell provide for nonexclusive public roec$ and utility
access. All e~sements, offers of dedication and conveyS. shell be
submitted a, nd recorded as directed by the City of Temecub.
Legal access as required by Ordinance i160 shall be provided from the parcel
map boundary to a City miintairled toed.
~ S TA FFR PT\ PM25212
1
9.a,
10.
11.
12.
13.
15.
16.
All delinquent property taxes shall be paid prier to retardation of the final
map.
The subdivider shall comply with the enviroamental health recxN,w,andations
outlined in the County Health [~t:s transmittat dated April 27, T990,
a copy of which is attached.
The subdivider shah comqoty with the flood cornrot rscc,.,,L~dations-outlinecl
in the Riverside County Flood Control District~s letter dated March 28, 1990,
a copy of which is attached, If the land division lies within an adoloted flood
control drainage are~ pursuant to Section 10.25 of Riverside County Land
Division Ordinance q60, appropriate fees for the coestruction of areadrainage
facilities shall be collected by tl~-. Road Commissioner prior to recordation of
the final map or waiver of parcel malo,
The subdivider shall comply with the County Road Commissioner's
recommendations outlined in the Office of Road Commissioners and County
Surveyor~s transmittal dated May 7, 1990.
The subdivider shall comply with' the fire improvement rec=:...~e~dations
outlined in the Cou,~ty Fire Department's letter dated March. 9, 1990, a copy
of which is attached.
.The subdivider shell ccmlNy with the rg,xm,,,,~a.-glatkms outlined in the Building
and Safety Department:. Grading Sectionts transmittai dated May. 7, 1990, a
capy of which is attached.
The subdivider shadl comply with the re~,,.-_~ set forth in the Airport
Land Use Commission letter dated October '2.~, i990, a copy of which is
attacl~ed.
The subdivider strait comply with the recommend~s outlined in the County
Geologist's lettar datmd March 29, 1990, a copy of which is attached.
Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shell be required to pay
applicable Quimby fees in accordapse wiffi Secthark 10.35 of Ordinanc~ q~4),
Prior to the issuance-of a grading permit, the applicant shell comply with the
provisions of Ordiaaace No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in
that ordinance. Shoukl Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions
of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by
Ordinance No. 663, the applicae~t shall pay the fee required by the Habitat
Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution,
Lots created by this subdivision shall be in confornmnce with the development
standards of the R-R
STA FFR PT\PM25212 2
17.
An Environmental Ccmstra'mts Sheet (ECS) shell be prepared with the final
map to delineate identified environmenta~ concm'ns and shall he permanently
filed with the office of the City Engiaeer. Prior to the recorclation of the final
map, a copy of the ECS shall be forwarded with copies-of the recorded final
map to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety.
The following note|s) shall he placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet.
"This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palemar
Observatory. Light and glare may advarsaiy impact ope~ions at the
Observatory. Outdoor lighting shall-he from law. pressure sodium Imps
that are oriented and shieitled to prevent direct illumination above the
horizontal plane passing through the iuminare."
Indicate the availability of clomestic water services to the subject
property as of the clat~ of recorc~tien of the final map.
Ce
The following rtete shall he placed on the final map: ConStraints
affecting this property are shown on the accomrmying Environmental
Constraints Sheet, the original. of which is on file at the office of the
City Engineer. These constraints affect all parcels.
18.
Parcel Map No. 25212 cannot he recorded until Change of Zone hie. 5663 is
approved and affectLye.
19.
Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the folio.wing condition shall. be
satisfied:
No building permits. shall he issued by the City for any residential
lot/unit within the project boundary until the deveioper~s successor~s-
in-interest provides evidence of compliance with public facility
financing measures. A cash sum of one-hundred dollars t$100) per
IotJ unit shall be deposited with the City as mitigation for public library
development.
Enqineerincl Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cast to any Government Ageecy. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways,-and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
20.
The Developer shall compky wLth the State et California Subdivision Map Act,
and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions.
" STAFFRPT\PM25212 3
21,
The final map shall be prepared by a licenud land surveyor or regisrated
Civil Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the State of California
Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No, ~lii.
PRIOR TO FINAL MAP APPROVAL:
22. The developer shell receive written clearance from the followin9 agencies:
- Ranche C~.. i.~ornie Waier District:
- Eastern Municipal Watar District;
- Riversid~ County Flood Control district;
- City of Tem~cuia Fire Burs:
- Planning Departmeet;
- Engineering Departnmnt;
- Riverside County Health Departanent: and
- CATV FraRchiee,
'23.
Street "A" shall be a prig;ate strm, not to be maintained by the City, and
shall be constructed 2~ feet in width', with an accqatable aggregme base | O.
thick ) on a 32 feet graded section, with a 38e radius turrr-a-round, County
Road Department Condition Nos, 3 and 1~ shal~ be deleted.
25.
Liefer Road shall be improved with 22 feet of half street improvement plus one
12' lane, or bond for the street improvement may be posted per Condition No.
26, within a 33 dedicated right-of-way in accordance with County Standard
No. 103, Section A 1~'/6&'). County Condition hies. 5 and 13 shah be
deleted,
·
A II road easements aed/or .street dedkations shall be offered for dedkatiorr to
the public and shall continue in force untii tha City accepts or abandons such
offers, All dedications shall be free from al'i encumbrances.as approved by the
City Engineer.
26.
The subdivider shaiL construct or pest security-and an agreement executed
guaranteeing the construclieet of the following publh: improvements in
conformance with epplicalole City standards.
be
Street imp_roy...t~ts, inckading, but not limited to: pavement, curb
aad guttar, drive aplmmaches, signing, striping, and other
control devices as appropriate. ·
Domestic ~at. er systm.
27.
28.
A minimum centerline street grade shall be 0.SO perrent.
All driveways shal~ be lecated a minimum of two 12) feet from the property
line.
STAFFRPT\PM25212 ~
29.
The subdivider shall submit four prints of a comp~.emnsive grading. plan to
the Engine~ring Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building
Code, Chapter :~0, and am my be additionally provil for in these Conditions
of Approval. The pin shall be drawn on 2~" x 36" mylar by a Registered Civil
Engineer.
30.
The subdivider shall submit four copies of a soils report to the Engineering
Department. The report shall address the .soils stability and geobgicai
conditions of the site.
31.
32.
Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface
drainage entering the property free~: Hv e:~t arm.
Prior to final map, the subdlvider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of
the Intent to Develop..Conduit shall be installed to. CATV StancksPds at time
of street improvements.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CRADING PERMITS:
33.
Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shail be paid
and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from *the City Engineeras Office,
in addition to my other permits required.
A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior to
commencement of any g+'eding outside of the City-maintained road right-of-
way.
35.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing
Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the are of new development. The
charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits.
-If the full Area-Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to
this property, no new charge needs t~ be paid.
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT:
36.
37.
A precise 9redbxJ piae shell be submitted to the-Engineering Department for
review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by aregistered Civil
Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soil Enginw shell issue a Final
Soils Report addreseimj campaction and site conditions.
The developer shell enter into an agrzc,.e:rt with the City stating that the
developer or any future owner of the parcels contained within Parcel Map No.
25212 will not protest any Assessment District formed for the purpose of
constructing the public street improvements for Nicolas Road on the frontage
of this map.
STAFF R PT\PM25212 5
PRIOR TO ISSUAN4:E OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
38.
Construct full street improvements including but not limited ts, curb and.
gutter, A, C, pavement, drive approaches, al~d parkway trees on all interior
public streets,
39.
All street improvements shall be instslled to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer.
Asphaltic emulsion Ifo9 seal) shall be applied not tess than 1~ days foliowincj
placement of the asphalt surfacing and shalL be applied at srate of 0,05 gallon
per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shell conform tp Section Nos, 37, 39, and
94 of the State Standard SpacificatLsn~,
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improyement~and pubMc facilities'
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic aad public
facility mitigatLsn as required under the EIRiNegative DecLsratien for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee, If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has n4>t been finally
established by the date on which Developer requeats its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agrwement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement m~y require the
payment of fees. in excess. of these new estimated ~assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) ~nd specificoily waives. its right to protest
such- increase,
Transportation Enqineerincl
PRIOR TO RECORDATION:
A signing and striping planshall be designed by a ragLeered Tr,,~:ic Engirteer
and approved by the City Engineer for Liefar Road and Street "A", and shall
be included in the street improvem~mt plam~.
Prior to designing any et the abov~ pimps, contact Transponatlon Engineering
for the design requir,,,. I V'~,
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY ENCROACHMENT PERMITS:
A construction are~ traffic control plan shaM+ be designed by a reglstered
Traffic Engine and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure
and detour or other disruptlsn to traffic circulation as required by the City
Enginw,
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS:
All signing and striping shall be installed per the City requirements and the
approved signing and striping plan.
STAFFRPT\PM25212 6
OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR
Ivan F. Termant
ACTING ROAD COMMISSIONER a, COUNTY SURVEYOR
Pay 7, 1990
COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER
MAILING ADDRESS:.
~ BOX 1000
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 9Z~0Z
(714} 2?_5-ea~__
Riverside County Planning C~mmission
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
Ladies and Gentlemen:
REg
TentativePM 25212 - Amend #2
Schedule H - Team 1 - SMD #9
AP #111-111-111-9
With respect to the conditions of approval for the
referenced. tentative land division map, the Transportation
Department recomaends that the landdivider provide the following
street improvements, street improvement plans and/or road
dedications in accordance with Ordinance 460 and Riverside County
Road Improvement Standards (Ordinance 461). It is understood
that the tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerline
elevations, all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage
courses with appropriate Q's, and that' their omission or
unacceptabilitymay require the map tO be resubmitted for further
consideration. These .Ordinances and the following conditions are
essential pans and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding
as though occurring in all. They are intended to be
complementary and to describe the conditions for a complete
design of the improvement. All questions regarding the'true
.meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Transportation
Planning and Development Review Division Engineer's Office.
The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from
damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns,
i.e., concentration of diversion of flow. Protection shall
be provid~ by constructing adequate drainage facilities
including enlarging existing facilities and/or by securing
a drainage easement. All drainage easements shall be shown
on the final map and noted as follows= 'Drainage Easement
- no building, obstructions, or encroacheents by land fills
are allowed". The protection shall he as approved bythe
Transportation Department.
The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all
offsite drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the
event the Transportation Planning and Development Review
Division Engineer permits the use of streets for drainage
purposes, the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance No. 460
COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER , 4080 LEHON STREL~ * RaVElSIDE. CAJJFDRNIA 92501
Tentative PM 25212 - Amend ~2
~My 7, 1990
Page 2
10.
11.
13.
4.
will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street
capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage
purposes, the subdivider shall provide .adequate drainage
facilities as approved by the Transportation Department.
Sufficient right of way along "A" Street shall be dedicated
for public use to provide for a 60 foot full width right. of
way.
Sufficient right of way
dedicated for public use
width right of way.
along Nicholas Road shall be
to provide for a 55 foot half
Sufficient right of way
dedicated for public use
width right of way.
along Liefer Road shall be
to provide for a 33 foot half
Corner cuthacks in conformance with County Standard No. 805
shell be shown on the final map ap~ offered for dedication.
Lot access shall be restricted on Nicholas Road and so
noted on the final map.
The landdivider shall provideutility clearance from Rancho
Califo.rnia Water District prior to the recordation of the
final map.
Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer
shell deposit with the Riverside County Transportation
Department, a-cash sum of $150.00 per lot as mitigation for
traffic signal impacts. Parcel I will be ex~aqpted from
mitigation due to the existing residence.
The maximum centerline gradient and the minimum centerline
radii shell be in conformance with County Standard #114 of
OrdinanCe 461.
All centerline interBections shall be at 90 ° or as approved
by the Transportation Department.
Nicholas Road shall be improved with 24 feet of acceptable
Aggregate Base (0.33' thick) on a 32 foot graded section
within a 110 foot full width dedicated right of way.
Liefer Road shall be improved with 24 feet of acceptable
Aggregate Base (0.33' thick) on a 32 foot graded section
within a 66 foot full width dedicated right of way.
"A" Street shall be improved with 24 feet of acceptable
Aggregate Base (0.33' thick) on a 32 foot graded section
within a 60 foot full width dedicated right of way.
Play 7 ~ 3.990
Page 3
15.
16.
417.
18.
19.
20.
21.
Improvement plans shall be based upon a Centerline profile
extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project
boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by t~
Riverside County Transportation Planning and Development
Review Division Engineer. Completion of road improvements
does not imply acceptance for maintenance by County.
An access road to the nearest road maintained for public
use shall be constructed with a 24 foot graded section
within a minimum 40 foot part width right of way in
accordance with an appr0ved centerline profile as approved
by the Transportation Planning and Development Review
Division Engineer.
A standard cul-de-sac shall be constructed within the
i andd iv i s ion.
Landdivisions creating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the
streets shall provide erosion control and sight distance
control as approved by the Transportatio~ Department.
A summary vacation of the superseded existing dedication
shall he applied for and processed for concurrent action at
the time of the adeption of the final map. If said excess
or superseded right of way is also County owned land, it
may be necessary to .enter into an agreement with the County
for its purchase or exchange.
The landdivider . shall
accordance with County
recordation of the
Transportation Planning
Engineer.
install street name sign(s) in
Standard No. 816 prior to
fins1 map as directed by the
and Development Review Division
Any landscaping within public road rights of way shall
comply with Transportation Department standards and require
approval by the Transportation Planning and Development
Review Division Engineer and . assurance of continuing
maintenance through the establishment of a landscape
maintenance district/maintenance agreement or similar
mechanism as approved by the Transportation Planning and
Development Review Division Engineer. Landscape plans shall
be submitted on standard County Plan sheet format (24" x
36"). Landscape plans shall be submitted with the street
improvement plans and shall depict gJllX such landscaping,
irrigation and related facilities as are to be placed
within the public road rights-of-way.
Yey 7, 1990
Page 4
Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act any
subdivision which is part of an existing Assessment
District must com~ly with the re~Juirements of said Section.
Division Eng.L,'~,=r
ATTACHMENT 5
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
CITY OF TEMEC~ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
PARCEL MAP No. 25212
DATE: January 26, 1993
IMPROVEMENTS
Streets and Draina4Ze
Water
Sewer
TOTAL
FAITHFULPERFORMANCE
SECURITY
$ 46,011.00
$ 1,500.00
$ 0.00
$ 47,511.00
MATERIAL & LABOR
SECURITY1
$ 23,005.00
$ 750.00
$ 0.00
$ 23,755.00
$1m,,~,+,,..,,., ~mtm~+~,.,, (1) far ms lms~)
'*(~rlkmdsifwskismspastsd)
$ 4,751.10
Monument Security
Traffic Signal Costs per Agreement.
Fire Mitigation Fee
RCFC Drainage Fee
Signalization Mitigation Fee - SMD #9
Conservation Habitat Fee (K-RAT)
Other Developer Fees (Quimby)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
3,500.00.
0.00
1,200.00
0.00
450.00
0.00
0.00
Planning Department Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan-Fee
Plan Check Fee
Inspection Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
$
$
$
$
$
58.00
4.00
2,592.89
1,762.89
250.00
Total Inspection/Plan Check Fees
Less Fees Paid To Date (Credit)
Total Inspection/Plan Check Fees Due
AGEND~/ARO06
4,667.78
4,667.78
0.00
ITEM NO.
11
APPROVAl.
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM: City Clerk
DATE:
February 9, 1993
SUBJECT: Reconfirmation of Local Emergency
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
RECONFIRMING THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY
BACKGROUND:
The provisions of Government Code Section 8630 require that "whenever a local emergency
has been proclaimed by an official designated by ordinance, the local emergency shall not
remain in effect for a period in excess of seven days unless it has been ratified by the
governing body... ". The City Council took that action at the meeting of January 19, 1992.
However, the same Government Code Section 8630 also provides "...The governing body
shall review, at least every 14 days until such local emergency is terminated, the need for
continuing the local emergency...". In order to comply with this review provision, staff will
place a resolution reConfirming the emergency on your agendas until the termination at the ·
earliest possible date that conditions warrant.
RESOLIYrlON NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECUIA RECONFIRMING THE EXISTENCE OF A
LOCAL F-,M~/RGENCY
WItE~AS, Ordinance No. 91-34 of the City of Temecula empowers the Disaster
Council/Disaster Director to proclaim the existence or threatened existence of a local emergency
when said city is affected or likely to be affected by a public calamity and the City Council is
not in session, subject to ratification by the City Council within seven days; and
WHEREAS, conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property have arisen
within this city, caused by extreme rainfall and flooding commencing on or about 4:30 PM on
the 16th day of January, 1993, at which time the City Council of the City of Temecula was not
in session; and
WHEREAS, said City CounCil does hereby find that the aforesaid conditions of extreme
peril did warrant and necessitate the proclamation of the existence of a local emergency; and
WHEREAS, the Disaster Council/Disaster Director of the City of Temecula did proclaim
the existence of a local emergency within said city on the 16th day of January, 1993.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, DOES
RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. It is hereby reconfirmed that said local emergency shall be deemed to
continue to exist until its termination is proclaimed by the City Council of the City of Temecula,
State of California.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 9th day of February, 1993.
ATTEST:
J. Sat Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL)
297 I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
CITY OF TEMEULA )
SS
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 93- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 9th day of February, 1993 by the following roll call vote.
COUNCILMI=-MBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
297 2
ITEM NO. 12
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
City Attorney/City Clerk
February 9, 1993
Consideration of Ordinance Making Technical and Conforming Amendments
to City Ordinances in Preparation of Codification of the Municipal Code
PREPARED BY:
Gregory G. Diaz, Esq., Burke, Williams & Sorensen
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council introduce and approve the first reading
of the Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, MAKING VARIOUS TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMEND-
MENTS TO THE CITY'$ MUNICIPAL CODE IN PREPARATION FOR CODIFI-
CATION OF THE SAME
BACKGROUND
Since the incorporation of the City of Temecula in December of 1989, the City Council has
adopted numerous ordinances prescribing and regulating activities within the City. In order
to develop a system of City laws that are readily available to the public, staff, and City
Council, a system of organization is necessary in order to quickly and efficiently find the
laws adopted by the City Council.
The City Clerk's office issued Request For Proposals to various companies that codify and
prepare municipal codes for cities throughout the country. Book Publishing Company
(BPC) was selected and awarded the contract to codify the Municipal Code for Temecula.
Book Publishing Company was sent copies of all City Ordinances which they reviewed to
begin the process of outlining where each Ordinance should be placed in the new Temec-
ula Municipal Code. In the process of reviewing the Ordinances adopted by the City, the
BPC identified some areas for which clarifications were
City Council Agende Report
Codification Ordinance
Page 2.
needed. The Ordinance as presented this evening reflects those clarifications and further
revisions to City Ordinances to add protections for the City of Temecula.
Section 1 of the Ordinance clarifies which Sales Tax Ordinance is to be operative as the
City adopted one as an Urgency Ordinance end another Ordinance through the regular
ordinance adoption process. Section 2 of the Ordinance repeals City Ordinance No. 89-13
pertaining to the interim planning agency. The City Council after incorporation named
itself as the interim planning agency in accordance with State law. Subsequently, the City
Council created and established a Planning Commission and set forth their powers and
duties. Consequently, Section 2 of the Ordinance repeals an obsolete ordinance.
Section. 3 of the Ordinance repeals a portion of 'City Ordinance No. 90-04 pertaining to
various uniform construction codes. This is required because the City subsequently
adopted Ordinance No. 92-13 which adopted the more up-to-date versions of the uniform
construction codes. Section 4 of the Ordinance repeals Ordinance No. 90-11 pertaining to
curfew provisions. The provisions of Ordinance No. 90-11 duplicate and are pre-empted
by State law. Therefore, we are recommending repeal of the duplicate ordinance.
Section 5 of the Ordinance clarifies which City Ordinances pertaining to the establishment
of the Redevelopment Agency and the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan are to be
codified. This is simply a direction for codification and not a repeal of any ordinances
adopted.
Section 6 of the Ordinance repeals City Ordinance No. 92-01 pertaining to the Uniform
Buildinc~ Code as the same was adopted by City Ordinance No. 92-13.
Section 7 of the Ordinance revises City Ordinance No. 91-33 to require the Planning
Department to review business registration applications prior to the issuance of the
certification to ensure that the proposed business is a permitted use at the location
proposed for the business. Section 8 of the Ordinance adds two additional types of
businesses which are subject to the registration provisions, i.e., mobile car wash and
mobile car detailing businesses.
Section 9 of the Ordinance amends Section 1.01.170 of the existing Temecula Municipal
Code adding and modifying definitions. Certain definitions were added and expanded at
the suggestion of Book Publishing Company (BPC). Where the existing Temecula
Municipal Code contained definitions not contained in the sample from the BPC, these
provisions were added. Where there was a conflict in language, the language from the
original Temecula Municipal Code was utilized.
Section 10 of the Ordinance clarifies that the Planning Commission is to serve as the
planning agency in accordance with adopted City procedures and City Ordinance No. 92-
14 which assigned the authority for land use decisions between City Staff, the Planning
Commission, and the City Council.
City Council Agenda Report
Codification Ordinance
Page 3.
Section 11 of the Ordinance revises the claims provision in Section 3.16.012 of the
Temecula Municipal-Code by requiring other public entities such as adjoining cities or the
county to file a claim for money and damages prior to commencing suit against the City.
This puts other public entities on the same footing as a private citizen having a claim
against the City of Temecula.
Section .12 of the Ordinance adds amendments to the Real Property Documentary Transfer
Tax Chapter of the Temecula Municipal Code to include recent amendments to the
Revenue and Taxation Code providing further exemptions from this tax. These amend-
ments are made for purposes of clarity as these amendments would apply irrespective of
action taken by the City Council pursuant to State law. State law requires that when the
State changes the exemptions to the real property documentary transfer tax that these
changes automatically become part of any local ordinance if the City Council fails to enact
the same.
Section 13 of the Ordinance amends the definition of an adult business to clarify the
definition such that a traditional, non-adult bar would not be subject to the adult business
regulations unless and until they become or operate as an adult business. Section 14 of
the Ordinance changes references to the "Community Development Department" to
"Planning Department."
Section 15 modifies an ambiguous provision of the adult use ordinance to clarify that a
Conditional Use Permit once issued must be used within one year or the permit becomes
void.
Section 16 of the Ordinance makes a minor amendment to Section 12.08.212 by requiring
three flares, red lanterns, or warning lights/reflectors for motortrucks with an unladen
weight of 10,000 pounds or greater. This change makes Section 12.08.212 consistent
with State law.
Section 17 of the Ordinance revises the public works construction standards by adopting
the "Green Book" otherwise known as the "Standards Specifications for Public Works
Construction" as the standard specifications for the City of Temecula. Furthermore, this
Section also adopts certain standard drawings for public works construction in the City
and designates that the same will be on file with the City Clerk. These drawings may be
changed or modified by Resolution of the City Council. Furthermore, this Section of the
Ordinance sets out a provision for dealing with conflicts between standard specifications,
standard drawings, and contract documents for public works projects.
Section 18 of the Ordinance re-enacts certain provisions of City Ordinance No. 92-13 to
reflect references to the latest edition of the Uniform Buildinq Code. This provision relates
to the requirements under Government Code Section 8875 et seo., (SB547), pertaining to
City Council Agenda Report
Codification Ordinance
Page 4.
unreinforced masonry buildings and the need for mitigation of hazards therefrom. This
provision is re-enacted in total with the only change constituting the version of the
Uniform Buildino Code to which it applies.
Section 19 of the Ordinance modifies the subdivision and land use decision-making matrix
to add additional decisions 'and deletes the requirement that the City hold a noticed public
hearing for map extensions and final maps which were initially approved by
Riverside County and for which the City of Temeculs has already held at least one public
hearing.
Once the City Council has acted on this "Clean-up" Ordinance, directions can then be
given to the BPC to finalize the codification process so that appropriate public notices and
hearings can be held on the codification of the City Code.
FISCAL IMPACT
None at this time outside from the budgeted costs of preparing the Municipal Code.
Attachments:
1. Resolution No. 93-
4
ORDINANCENO. 93.-
AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CAt-wORNIA, MAKING VARIOUS
TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING Abw~NDMEN'I~
THE CITY'S MUNICIPAL CODE IN PREPARATION FOR
CODIFICATION OF ~ SAME
THE C1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HERF~RY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. City Ordinance Nos. 89-5 and 89-26 cover essentially the same subject
matter. It is the intent of the City Council to utilize City Ordinance No. 89-26 for purposes
of administering the sales and the use tax and consequently, Ordinance No. 89-26 is directed
to be codified. Ordinance No. 89-5 is hereby repealed.
Section 2. City Ordinance No. 89-13 which established an interim planning agency
is hereby repealed.
Section 3. Section 31 of City Ordinance No. 9004 which adopted by reference
Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73 pertaining to the adoption of various uniform
construction codes is hereby superseded. by City Ordinance No. 92-13 and Section 31 of
Ordinance No. 90-04 and Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73 axe hereby repealed.
Section 4. Ordinance No. 90-11, adopted on July 24, 1990., which adopted certain
curfew provisions duplicated in State law, is hereby repealed.
Section 5. City Ordinance Nos. 91.08 and 91-14 pertain to the activation of the
Redevelopment Agency. City Ordinance Nos. 91-11 and 91-15 pertain to the adoption of the
Redevelopment Plan. All four Ordinances were validated by a judgment of the Riverside
County Superior Court in Dawes. et al. v. Riverside Redevelopment Agency. et aJ., RCSC
No. 194468. As all four Ordinances were validated by the Court, it is not necessary to
codify all four Ordinances. Consequently, the City Council directs that Ordinance Nos. 91-
08 and 91-11 be codified. Ordinance Nos. 91-14 and 91-15 shall remain uncodified.
Section 6. Ordinance No. 92-01 which amended the Uniform Building Code in
accordance with Riverside County Ordinance No. 457 is hereby superseded by City Ordi-
nance No. 92-13 and City Ordinance No. 92-01 is hereby repealed.
Section 7. Section 1.07 of City Ordinance No. 91-33 is hereby amended to read as
follows:
R:~ORDS\45
1.07 Certificate-Application-Contents.
A. Every person, association, organization, institution, firm, or corporation
required to have a certificate under the provisions of this Chapter shall make application to
the City on a form provided by the City. Completed applications and fees shall be mailed to
the Business License Services Office and the miniraze! information required on the application
form shall include,' but not be limited to, the following:
1. The name of the person to whom the certificate is to be issued;
2. The name of the business;
3. The specific type of business to be conducted;
4. The mailing address of the business;
5. The place where the business is to be transacted and carried on;
6. Written verification from the Planning Department that the
proposed use' is permitted;
7. The name, telephone number, and address of the person to
notify in the event of an emergency;
8. Whether hazardous mfaterials or chemicals will be stored at the
business location to the extent permitted within the Hazardous Materials Ordinance;
9. The State Board of Equalization Resale Certificate number if a
resale certificate is required by the State Board of Equalization and reporting district number;
10. Complete the recycling and solid waste diversion forms attached
to the business registration application as described in Section 1.14A2 hereof; and
11. Evidence that any and all state, federal or county permits or
certificates required to. conduct the applicable business or profession have been lawfully
acquired. No application shall be deemed final until adequate evidence of such permits or
certificate have been shown. Applicants shall provide certificate numbers as evidence.
B. Subject to the Public Records Act requirements, the information
requested by Subdivisions 7, 9, and 10 of Subsection A of this Section shall be considered
confidential and will not be made available to the public.'
Section 8. Section 2.07 of City Ordinance No. 91-33 is hereby amended by
the addition of subsections T and U to read as follows:
R:\ORD$\45
2.07 ]VSscelhneous Cate[,orics.
T. Mobile Car Wash.
U. Mobile Car Detailing.
Section 9 Section 1.01.170, "Definitions," of the Ternecula Municipal Cede is
hereby amended to read as follows:
"1.01,170 l~finitions. As used in this Cede, unless a different meaning is apparent
from the context or is specified elsewhere in the Cede:
31 of any given year.
'Calendar year' shall mean from January 1 through December
(b) 'City' shall mean the City of Temecula.
(c) 'City Manager' shall mean the appointed offxcial of the City
who occupies the position of chief administrative officer of the City.
(d) 'Council' shall mean the City Council of the City of Temecula.
Council.
(e)
'Council Member' shall mean a person duly elected to the City
(f) 'County' shall mean the County of Riverside.
(g) 'Fiscal year' shall mean from July 1 of any given year through
June 30 of the following year.
'Gender.' The masculine gender shall include the feminine and
neuter genders.
(i) 'Goods' shall mean and include wares and merchandise.
(j) 'Law' denotes applicable federal law, the Constitution and
statutes of the State of California, the Ordinances of the City of Temecula, and when
appropriate, any and all rules and regulations which may be promulgated thereunder.
(k) 'May' shall be permissive.
R:\ORDS~.45
3
(1) 'Month' shall mean a calendar month, unless otherwise specially
expressed.
(m) 'Must' is mandatory.
(n) 'Number.' The singular number shall include the plural, and
the plural number shall include the singular.
(o) 'Oath' includes an affirmation or declaration in all cases in
which, by law, an affirmation may be substituted for an oath, and in such cases the words
'swear' and 'sworn' shall be equivalent to the words 'at-firm' and 'affLrmed.'
(p) 'Official time standard.' Wherever certain hours are named in
this Code, they shall mean Standard Time or Daylight Saving Time as may be in current use
in the City.
(q) 'Operate' shall mean and include carrying on, keeping,
conducting, or maintaining.
(r) 'Owner,' applied to a building or land, shall include any part
owner, joint owner, tenant, tenant in common, or joint tenant of the whole or a part of such
building or larid.
(s) 'Person' shall include any person, joint venture, joint stock
company, firm, company, corporation,. paxtnership, association, public corporation, City
(except the City of Temecula), the County of Riverside, any district in the County of
Riverside, the State of California, or the United States of America, or any department,
agency, or political subdivision of the above, club, business, trust, organization, or the
manager, lessee, agent, servant, officer, or employee of any of them, 'unless this Code
expressly provides otherwise.
(t) 'Personal property' shall include money, goods, chattels, things
in action, and evidences of debts.
(u) 'Police' shall mean the agency which performs the appropriate
law enforcement function for the City..'Police Chief' or 'Chief of Police' shall mean the
head of the agency or division which at the time involved has responsibility for performing
the police function for, or within, the City.
respectively.
(v)
'Preceding' and 'following' means next before and next after,
(w) 'Property' shall include real and personal property.
R:\ORDS~45
4
(x) 'Quarterly,' where used to designate a period of time, shall
mean the first three (3) calendar months of any given year or succeeding period of three (3)
calendar months.
Cv)
'Real property' shall include land, tenements, and hereditame-
(z) 'Sale' shall include any sale, exchange, barter, or offer for sale.
(aa) 'Shall' shall be mandatory.
(ab) 'Sidewalk' means that portion of a street between the curbline and
the adjacent property line intended for the use of pedestrians..
(ac) 'State' shall mean the State of California.
(ad) 'Street' shall include all streets, highways, avenues, boulevards,
alleys, courts, places, squares, or other public ways in the City which have been or may
hereafter be dedicated and open to public use, or such other public property so designated in
any law of the State.
(ae) 'Tenant or occupant,, applied to a building or land, shall include
any person who occupies the whole or a part of such building or land, whether alone or with
others.
(at) 'Tense.' The present tense shall include the past and future
tense, and the future tense shall include the present tense.
(ag) 'Writing' includes any form of recorded message capable of
comprehension by ordinary visual means. Whenever any notice, report, statement, or record
is required or authorized by this Code, such notice, report, statement, or record shall be
made in writing in the English language, unless this Code expressly provides otherwise.
(ah) 'Written' includes printed, typewritten, mimeogmphed, multigrap-
hed, or otherwise reproduced in permanent visible form.
Words and phrases not defined in this Code shall be construed
according to the approved usage of the language, or, when appropriate, by reference to
definitions contained in State or Federal law."
Section 10. Section 2.06.010, "Commissions Established," of the Temecula Munici-
pal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
R:\ORDS~45
?.06.010 Commissions l~-fmblished. There shall be established within the City a
Planning Commission.. For purposes of Slate planning law, the Planning Commission shall
serve as the Planning Agency, unless another official or body is specifically designated to
perform that function or make a particular decision as provided by Ordinance of the City.
Division of land use decision making authority shall be as set forth in Ordinance No. 92-14.
The City Council may establish by Ordinance and Resolution such other commissions as it
deems necessary."
Section 11. Sections 3.16.012 to 3.16.017 are hereby added to the Temecula
Municipal Code to read as follows:
"3.16.012 Applicability of Claims - Other Public Entities. Pursuant to Section 935
of the Government Cede, all claims-against the City for money, damages, or indemnification
by any public entity which is exempted by Section 9050) of the Government Code from the
provisions of Division 3.6 of the Government Code (Section 810 et sea_.), including but not
limited to Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 900) and Chapter 2 (commencing with Sec-
tion 910), and is not governed by any other statutes or regulations expressly relating thereto
shall be governed by the procedure prescribed herein.
3.16.013 Presentation of Claim as Prerequisite to Suit by Other Public Entities. No
suit for money, damages, or indemnification may be brought against the City by any public
entity described in Section 3.16.012 until a written claim therefor has been presented and
.acted upon, or has been deemed to have been rejected, in accordance with this Chapter and
Sections 945.4, 945.6, and 946 of the Government Code.
3.16.014 Time Limitation for Presentation of Claim by Other Public Entities. Any
claim specified in Section 3.16.013 shall be presented in accordance with the time limitations
set forth in Government Code Section 911.2. In addition, pursuant to Government Code
Section 901, any claim against the City for equitable indemnity or partial equitable indemnity
shall be presented not later than six (6) months after the date upon which a defendant is
served with the complaint giving rise to the defendant's claim for a cause of action for
equitable indemnity or partial equitable indemnity against the City.
3.16.015 Late Filing of Claims by Other Public Entities. In accordance with Section
935 of the Government Code, the late filing of claims pursuant to this Chapter is regulated
by Sections 911.4 and 911.6 through 912.2, inclusive, of the Government Code.
signed,
Clerk.
or to a
3.16.016 Presentation and Contents of Claims Filed by Other Public Entities. A
written claim shall be presented to the City by mailing or delivering it to the City
The claim shall conform to the requirements of Section 910 of the Government Code
form provided by the City, if such form is provided.
3.16.017 Procedures for Consideration of Claim Filed by Other Public Entities.
Unless otherwise provided in this Chapter, the procedure for consideration and action upon
R:'~ORD$\45
6
all claims filed pursuant to this Chapter shall be the same as the procedure provided and re-
quired by Sections 910.2 through 91~.4, inclusive, of the Government Code, except Section
91 1.2~ In accordance with Section 935 of the Government Code, the consideration and
action upon claims presented pursuant to Section 3.16,015 of this Chapter shall be the same
as the procedure provided and required by Section 946.6 of the Government Code.*
Section 12. Chapter 3.22, 'Real Property Documentary Transfer Tax," of the
Tetnecula Municipal Code is hereby amended by the amendments to Sections 3.22.040 and
3.22.050, and the addition of Sections 3.22.042, 3.22.052, and 3.22.054 to read as follows:
'3.22.040 Tax Inapplicable to Instruments in Writina to Secure Debts -- (In
Lieu of Foreclosure). Any tax imposed pursuant to this Chapter, shall not apply with respect
to any deed, instrument, or writing to a beneficiary or mortgagee, which is taken for the
mortgagor or trustor as a result of, or in lieu of foreclosure; provided, that such tax to apply
to the extent that the consideration exceeds the unpaid debt, including accrued interest and
cost of foreclosure. Consideration, unpaid debt amount, and identification of grantee as
beneficiary or mortgagee, shall be noted on said deed, instrument, or writing, or stated in the
affidavit or declaration under penalty of perjury for tax purposes.
3.22.042 Tax Inapplicable to Any Deed. Instrument. or Other Writing, Which
Purports to Transfer. Divide. or Allocate Property Assets Between Spouses Under a]udg-.
ment of Dissolution of Marriage. Separation. or Agreement in Contemplation' of 1udgment.
· or Order.
(a) Any tax imposed pursuant to this Chapter, shall not apply with
respect to any deed, instrument, or other writing which purports to transfer, divide, or
allocate community, quasi-community, quasi-marital property assets between spouses for the
purpose of effecting a division of community, quasi-community, or quasi-marital property
which is required by judgment decreeing a dissolution of the marriage or legal separation, by
judgment of nullity, or by any other judgment or order rendered pursuant to Part 5 (corn-'
mencing with Section 4000) of Division 4 of the Civil Code, or by a written agreement
between the spouses,. executed in contemplation of any such judgment or order, whether or
not the written agreement is incorporated as a part of any of those judgments or orders.
(b) In order to qualify for the exemption provided in subdivision (a),
the deed, instrument, or other writing, shall include a written recital, signed by either
spouse, stating that the deed, instrument, or other writing is entitled to the exemption.
3.22.050 Government and its Agencies Not Liable. The United States or any
agency or instrumentality thereof, or any State or territory, or any political subdivision there-
of, or the District of Columbia, shall not be liable for any tax imposed pursuant to this
Chapter with respect to any deed, instrument, or writing to which it is a party or by which it
acquires title to property.
R:\ORDSX45
3.?.?.052 r~eed. Instrument. or Other Writing for Conveyance of Rt~!ty by
State or Politie'~! Subdivision or Agenqy with Agreement for Pro'chaser to Reconvey. Any
tax imposed pursuant to this .Chapter, shall not apply with respect to any deed, instrument, or.
other writing by which realty is conveyed by the State of California, any political subdivision
thereof, or any agency or instrmnentality of either thereof, pursuant to an agreement whereby
the purchaser agrees to immediately reconvey the realty to the exempt agency.
3.22.054 -Dccd. Instrument. or other Right for Conveyance by State. Political
Subdivision. or Ai'ency of Real~y Financed by Obligations Issued by Non-Profit Corporation.
Any tax imposed pursuant to this Chapter shall not apply with respect to any deed, instru-
ment, or other writing by which the State of California, any political subdivision thereof, or
agency or instrumentality of either thereof, conveys to a non-pwfit corporation realty the
acquisition, construction, or impwvement of which was financed or refinanced by obligations
issued by the non-profit corporation on behalf of a governmental unit, within the meaning of
Section 1.103Co) of Title 26 of the Cede of Federal Regulations."
Section 13. Section 5.05.004Co) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
"5.05.004 Definition ....
(b) 'Adult business' means a business which is conducted exclusively
for the patronage of adults .and as to which minors are specifically excluded from patronage,
either by law and/or by the operators of such business and which business has its employees
or patrons expose 'specified anatomical areas' or engage in 'specified sexual activities,' or
any business which offers to its patrons services or entertainment characterized by an
emphasis on matter depicting, exposing, describing, discussing, or relating to 'specified
sexual activities,' or 'specified anatomical areas.' The phrase 'adult business' also means
and includes any adult arcade, adult bookstore, adult cabaret, adult hotel or motel, adult
theater, adult model studio, body painting studio; massage parlor, and any other business
involving 'specified sexual activities' or 'specified anatomical areas'."
Section 14. Section 5.05.014 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended
to replace all references to the "Community Development Department" with the phrase
"Planning Department."
Section 15. Section 5.05.024 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended
to read as follows:
"5.05,024 Time Limits For Use of a Conditional Use Permit. If a Conditional Use
Permit for an adult business is approved by the City, the applicant shall commence use of the
R:\ORDS~45
Permit within the timeframe required by Riverside County Ordinance No. 348, otherwise the
permit shall be void. *
Section 16. Section 12.08,212 (a), 'Display of Warning Devices When Commercial
Vehicle Disabled, * of the Temecula Municipal Code as the same was adopted by City
Ordinance No. 91-16, is hereby amended to read as follows:
'12.08.212 Display of Warning Devices when Commercial Vehicle Disabled.
(a) Every motor truck having an unladen weight of ten-thousand (10,000)
pounds or more, every truck tractor irrespective of weight when operated upon
any street or highway during the time specified and Section 280 of the Vehicle
Code shall be equipped with and carry at least three (3) flares, or three (3) red
lanterns, or three (3) warning lights or reflectors, which reflector shall be of a
type approved by the Department of California Highway Patrol.'
Section 17. Section 13.04,010 'Public Works Construction Standards,* is hereby
added to the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows:
"13.04.010 Public Works Construction Standards.
(a) There are hereby established and adopted certain Standard
Drawings for the construction of any public works projects in the City of Temecula. Copies
of such drawings shall be on file with the City Clerk and may be purchased from the Public
Works Department. Changes or modifications to said Standard Drawings may be adopted by
the City Council by Resolution thereof.
(b) The City Council hereby adopts the latest edition of the Standard
Specifications for Public Works Construction, commonly known as the 'Green Book' as the
Standard Specifications for all public works projects in the City. A copy of said Standard
Specifications shall be on file in the Office of the City. Clerk.
(c) The Director of Public Works/City Engineer is hereby autho-
rized to modify or change said Standard Specifications in the development of the contract
documents for any public works project in the City.
(d) In the event of any conflict between the contract documents, the
Standard Drawings, and the Standard Specifications for any public works project, the provi-
sions of the contract documents shall control over the Standard Drawings and the Standard
Specifications. In the event of any conflict between the Standard Drawings and the Standard
Specifications, the Standard Drawings shall control over the Standard Specifications. u
Section 18. Section 2 of City Ordinance No. 92-13 is hereby amended by the
addition of a new subsection (r) to read as follows:
R:\ORDS\45
9
"Chap 71
SEISMIC HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION PROGRAM
Sec~tions 71.01 - 71.09
71.01
71.02
71.03
71.04
71.05
71.06
71.07
71.08
71.09
71.10
71.11
71.12
71.13
Defirfitions
Potentially Hazardous Buildings
Exemptions
Identification Process
Final Listing of Potentially Hazardous Buildings
Order and Recordation
Appeal from Order
Engineering P-~ports
Responsibiliti~ of Building Owners
.Status Reports
Abatement ~f Dangerous Buildings
Remedies
71.01 Purpose
The purpose of this Section is to promote public safety by identifying those potentially
hazardous buildings in Temecula and establish a program to mitigate potential hazards as
required by SB 547, Government Code Section 8875 et sea_.
71.02 Definitions
(a) 'Bearing wall' means any wall supporting a floor or roof where the total
superimposed load exceed one hundred (100) pounds per linear foot, or any unreinforeed
masonry wall supporting its own weight when over six (6) feet in height.
(b) 'Building,' for the purpose of determining occupant load, means any
contiguous or interconnected structure; for purposes of engineering evaluation means the
entire structure or a portion thereof which will respond to seismic forces as unit.
(c) 'Building Geometry' means a building's shape or configuration, including
setbacks or wall/column lines, reentrant comers, diseontinuities in vertical and horizontal
lateral force diaphragms, open storefront and building stiffness variations due to the distribu-'
tion of resisting elements or the use of material of differing properties within the same
structural element, or other irregularities in plan or elevation.
R:XORDS\45
10
(d) 'Capacity for transfer' means the maximum allowable capacity of a
structural system or connection to resist in a ductile manner the lateral forces it would
encounter due to earthquake forces.
(e) 'Civil Engineer or Structural Engineer' means an active, licensed civil or
structural engineer registered by the State of California pursuant to the rules and regulations
of Tifie 16, Chapter 5 of the California Code of Regulations.
(f) 'External hazard' means an object attached to or forming the exterior
facade of a building which may fall onto pedestrians or occupants of adjacent buildings.
Examples of this type of hazard include, but are not limited to, the following:.
1. Nonstructural exterior all panels, such as .masonry in~ll or decorative
precast concrete.
2. Parapets.
3. Marquees, awnings or other roof-like projections from a building.
4. Masonry or stone Wall veneer and wall ornamentation, including cornices
or other decorative appendages.
5. Masonry chimneys.
6. Tile roofing.
7. Wall signs and exterior lighting fixtures hung from a building exterior.
8. Fire escapes or balconies.
(g) 'Occupants' means the total occupant load of a building determined by
Table 33-A of the 1991 Uniform Building Code of the actual maximum number of occupants
in that building if that number is less than seventy-five percent (75%) of the number
determined by using Table 33-A. The number of actual occupants may be documented by
counting actual seating capacity if permanent seating is provided in occupancy, or by
employee and client counts which can be substantiated as a practical maximum use of the
space in the building. The Building Official will establish the procedure for documenting
occupant loads.
(h) 'Solution' means any justifiable method that will provide for the transfer
of lateral forces through a system or connection to a degree which will substantially eliminate
a potential collapse failure. A general description of the methods and materials to be used
shall be included in sufficient detail to allow for a cost estimate of the solution to be made
R:\ORDS~.45
(i.e., adding shear walls, overlaying horizontal diaphragms, strengthening critical connec'
tions, et~.).
(i) 'Unreinforced masonry (URM) building' means any building containing.
walls constructed whony or pattiany with any of the following materials:
1. Unreinforced brick masonry.
2. Unreinforced concrete masonry.
3. Hollow clay tile.
4. Adobe or unburned clay masonry.
Unreinforced refers to construction without imbedded metal rebar of 3/8"
diameter minimum or wire mesh meeting engineering standards for the specific building type
in question.
(j) 'Unreinforced masonry (URM) wall' is a masonry wall in which the area
of reinforcing steel is less than twenty five percent (25%) of that required by the Building
Code for reinforced masonry.
(k) 'Unreinforced masonry bearing wall' is a URM wall which provides the
vertical support for a floor or roof for which the total superimposed load is over one-hundred
(100) pounds per linear foot of wall.
71.03 Potentially Hazardous Buildings.
The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to all existing buildings in Seismic
Zone 4 having at least one unreinforced masonry bearing wall. Except as provided herein,
all other provisions of the Building Code shall apply.
71.04 Exemptions
This Chapter shall not apply to:
1. Detached one or two family dwellings and detached apartment houses
containing less than 5 dwelling units and used solely for residential purposes.
2. Essential Facilities as defined in Table 23-K of the Building Code.
3. Hazardous Facilities as defined in Table 23-K of the Building Code.
R:\ORDS~45
12
4. Buildings designate~ as historical landmarks or pre~rvation districts as
designated by Ordinance of the City Council, pwvided such buildings comply with all the
requirements provided in said Ordinance.
5. Federal Buildings, State Buildings and Public Schools, for which the City
has no jurisdiction.
6. Buildings which have been structurally upgraded in substantial accordance
with the 1973, or later, edition of the Uniform Building Code.
71.05 Identification Process
(a) Survey. The Building Official will cause to be completed a survey of
structure in the community and research of available records to develop preliminary list of
potentially hazardous buildings. As required by SB 547, the Building Official will cause said
list to be submitted to the California Seismic Safety Commission.
(b) Initial Owner Notification. The property owners whose buildings have
been identified on the preliminary list shall be notified by the City that their building has
been' identified as being potentially hazardous within the scope of this Chapter, and that if
this building is on the final listing that they will be required to have an engineering report
prepared on the structural adequacy of this building. The initial notification will include a
request of submission of any and all information within ninety (90) days as to the building's
age, structure, occupancy, repairs or improvements to strengthen the building, and documen-
tation if their structure may qualify for an exemption.
71,06 Final Listin~ of Potentially Hazardous Buildings
At a scheduled public hearing, notice of which will be provided to the property
owners of each building on the preliminary list, the City Council' will consider all evidence,
testimony and the recommendations of Building and Safety in developing a final Listing of
Potentially Hazardous Buildings.
71.07
Order and Recordation
Within thirty (30) days of the City Council's determination, the City Clerk shall cause
to have issued an order to each and every owner of buildings on the final Listing of Poten-
tially Hazardous Buildings. The order shall be in writing and shall be served either personal-
ly or by certified or registered mail upon the. owner as shown on the last equalized assess-
ment, and upon the person, if any, in apparent charge or control of the building. The order
shall specify that the building has been determined by the City to be within the scope of this
Chapter, and, therefore is required to prepare an engineering report as outlined in Section
R:\ORDS\45
71.08 of this Chapter. Said engineering report shall be submitted to the City's Building and
Safety Division within six (6') months of the date of the mailed notice.
At the time that the aforementioned order is served, the City Clerk shall file with the
Office of the County Recorder a certificate stating that the subject building is within the
scope of this Chapter and that the owner has been ordered to structurally analyze the building
and file an engineering rcpon with thc City within (6) months of that datc.
71.08
The owner of the building may appeal the building of~cial's initial determination that
the building is within the scope of this Chapter to the Board of Appeals established by
Section 204 of the Building Code. Such appeal shall be filed with the Board within thirty
(30) days from the service date of the order described in Section 71.07 of this Chapter. Any
such appeal shall be decided by the Board no later than ninety (90) days after writing and the
grounds thereof shall be stated clearly and concisely. Appeals or requests for modifications
from any other determinations, orders or actions by the building official pursuant to the
Chapter shall be made in accordance with the procedures established in Sections 105 and 106
of the Building Code.
71.09
Engineering Reports
(a) Preparation of Reports. Building owners of potentially hazardous
buildings shall employ a civil or structural engineer to prepare the investigation and engineer-
ing report outlined below and as referenced to Appendices A and B.
Co) Purpose. The engineer shall investigate, in a thorough and
unambiguous fashion, the building's structural systems that resist the forces imposed by
earthquakes and to determine if any individual portion or combination of these systems is
inadequate to result in a structural failure (collapse or partial collapse).
(c) General. Each building shall be treated as an individual case
without prejudice or comparison to similar type or age building which may have'greater or
lessor earthquake resistance. Generalities or stereotypes are to be avoided in the evaluation
process by focusing on the specifics of the structural system of the building in question and
the. local geology of the land on which the building is constructed.
(d) Level of Investigation. Some buildings may require extensive
testing and field investigation to uncover potential structural deficiencies, while others will
allow the same level of overall evaluation by a less complicated process due to the simplicity
of design or the availability of original or subsequent alteration design or construction
documents.
R:\ORDS\45
14
(c) Format for the Report. The following is a basic outline of the
format each engineering report should follow. This outline shall not be construed to be a
constraint on the professional preparing the report, but rather to provide a skeleton frame-
work within which individual approaches to assembling the information required by this
Chapter may be accomplished. It shall serve as a means for the City to evaluate the
completeness of each report.
1. General Information. A description of the building including:
(i) strut ad~ss;
(ii) the type of occupancy use within the building, with separate
uses that generate different occupant loads indicated on a plan showing the square footage of
each different fuse;
(iii) plans and elevations showing the location, type and extent of
lateral force resisting elements in the buildings (both horizontal and vertical elements);
(iv) a description of the construction materials used in the structural
elements and information regarding their present condition;
(v) the date of original construction, if known, and the date, if
known, of any subsequent additions or substantial structural alterations of the building; and
(vi) the name and address of the original designer and contractor, if
known, and the name and address of the designer and contractor, if known, for any subse-
quent additions or substantial structural alternations.
2. Investigation and Evaluation of Structural Systems. All items to be investigated
and the methods of investigation for each type of building under consideration are contained
in Appendices A and B, attached hereto.
3. Test RepOrts. All field and laboratory test results shall be included in the report.
Evaluation of the significance of these test results shall be made with regard to each structur-
al system or typical connection being evaluated. This evaluation may be limited to a
statement of the adequacy or inadequacy of the system or connection based on the lateral
load demand it would be required to resist by calculation. If tests reveal inadequacy, a
conceptual solution must be included in the report.
4. Conclusions. Based on the demand/capacity ratio and the specific evaluation items
contained in Appendices A and B, a statement shall be provided explaining the overall
significance of the deficiencies found to exist in the building's lateral force resisting system
regarding potential collapse or partial collapse failure.
R:~,ORDS\45
15
5. Recommendations. An appropriate solution, which could be used to strengthen
the structure to alleviate any collapse or paniRa collapse threat, shall be specified.
(0 Exceptions and Alternatives. Exceptions to the specific items required t~;
be included in an engineering report my be granted by the Building Official upon review of
a written request from the engineer preparing the report. Such a request shall provide
evidence that adequate information concerning the required items(s) can be determined by
Ratemate means or that conclusion can be made about the item without following the solution
called for in the appropriate appendix. The purpose of granting such. exceptions shall be to
reduce the costs or disruption that would result from taking required actions, when it can be
shown that they are unnecessary to provide information available by other equlvRaent means.
In no case will an exception be granted which would result in an item not being completely
evaluated. The decision of the Building Official in granting exceptions is fmRa.
71.09 Review of Reports
(a) City Building and Safety Officials will review the report, with the
assistance of civil and structural engineers as necessary, to determine whether the report
conforms with the requirements of this Chapter. ·
(b) The cost of this review shall be recovered by a fee assessed from the
building owner based on the time required for the review. This fee amount may be deducted
from or partially credited to the plan checking fee collected for any future construction work
that deals direc~y with correcting any of the structural inadequacies specified in the engineer-
ing report.
(c) Copies of the engineering report shall be available to interested individuals
for a standard copying fee or may be reviewed at the Building and Safety Offices during
regular office hours.
71.1O Responsibilities of Building Owners
buildings.
(a) Availability of Report. The report shall be available to the tenants of the
(b) If the building is found in compliance, another notice of that fact will be
recorded to that effect.
(c) Letter of Intent. A building owner shall submit a letter to the City
Building and Safety Office within six (6) months of the date the engineering report was
submitted, indicating the owner's intentions for dealing with the potential collapse hazards
found to exist in the building.
71,11 Status Reports
R:\ORD$\45
16
The Building Official shall submit periodic reports, not less than annually, to the City
Council on the stares of the seismic hazards identification program. The reports shnll include
information regarding the number of buildings analyzed, the severity of the structural
inadequacies discovered and any action ~ by individual building owners to correct these
inadequacies.
71.12 Abatement of Dangerous. Buildings
It satisfactory progress is not made or intent plans of the building are not followed,
the City may process the structure as a Dangerous Building pursuant to City Building Code
Section 203, et s~.
71.13 Remedies
It shall be unlawful for the owner of a building identified as being in the scope of this
Chapter to fail to submit a report on either building collapse hazards or external hazards,
provide notice or to fail to submit a letter to intent within the time periods specified in this
Chapter. The following remedies are available to the City:
a. The City may seek injunctive relief on behalf of the public to enjoin a
building owner's violation of this Chapter.
b. A building owner violating this Chapter shall be guilty .of a misdemeanor
and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punishable in accordance with Section 1.01.200 of
Temecula Municipal Code.
R:\ORD$~45
Procedures for Investigation of All Buildings
(Except Unreinforced Masonry Bearing Wall Types)
A. Preliminary Field Survey. Provide drawings of the building in plan, elevation and
section sufficiently detailed to reveal the correct dimensions of the spans and extent of all
structural elements in the building, inciuding openings in walls and changes in framing
directions or other data which will be used to evaluate the building.
B. Areas of Special Investigation.
1. Specify the type of roof diaphragm used in the building and its capacity for
transfer of lateral forces.
2. If the building is multi-story specify the existing floor diaphragm at each level
above the foundation and give its capacity for transfer of lateral forces.
3. Specify the types and spacing of connections used at each level to transfer the
forces of the horizontal diaphragms into the vertical shear resisting elements of the structure,
and the capacity for transfer of each type of connection present in the building.
4. Specify the type of vertical structural elements which resist lateral forces and
their individual capacities as determined either by testing or use of standard values for the
types of construction found in the vertical elements.
5. Specify the type and spacing of connections used to connect vertical shear
resisting elements to each other and to the building foundation, and the capacity for transfer
of each type of connection present.
ment.
Specify the type of foundation system used and note any evidence of settle-
7. Specify the type of connection used to attach wall appendages or precast wall
elements to the structural frame.
Standards for the Analysis and Evaluation of All Buildings
(EXcept Unreinforced Masonry Bearing Wall Types)
A. Purpose. The objective of these investigations is to identify and quantify the
structural inadequacies that may be present in a building which could lead to a collapse or
partial collapse during an earthquake. The focus of the reports should be:
R:\ORDS\45
A-1
1. determining the potential life safety threat that the building presents to its occu-
pants; and,
2. the potential threat to pedestrians or occupants of adjacent buildings from falling
external hazards.
B. Capacity vs. Demand of the Bxisting Structural System and Its Elements.
1. Define the overall type of lateral force resisting system used in the building
based on Table 23-1 of the 1973 Uniform Building Code. If the building has a dual or
hybrid system, describe the systems and explain how they function both in combination and
separately to justify the 'K" factor to be chosen.
2. For each type of diaphragm, shear wall, moment frame, braced frame and
interconnection of hteral force resisting system provide an analysis of the loads (demand)
which these elements would be subject to based on the design parameters set forth in the
1973 edition of the Uniform Building Code.
3. For each type of diaphragm, shear wall, frame and interconnection of lateral
force resisting system determine a maximum capacity based on currently accepted or
published allowable values, adjusted as appropriate for the material involved when used to
resist earthquake forces.
4. Provide a ratio of capacity to demand for each system or interconnection
evaluated in 2. and 3. above and provide a statement of the significance of this ratio, re-
garding the potential for failures which could lead to a collapse, considering the materials
used and the type of lateral force resisting system present.
C. Specific Evaluation Items. The report shall contain a statement regarding the
significance of each item in this section which is found to occur in the building.
1. General. ·
a. Assess the condition of the structure, the quality of workmanship, the
level of maintenance and the type of construction with regard to the potential loss of strength
in the structural systems due to decay or deterioration.
b. Assess the redundancy exhibited in the structural system and the
reserve capacity that elements of the system may provide.
c. Assess the presence or lack of ductility in the lateral force resisting
elements and ductility differences due to the use of dissimilar materials in the horizontal and
vertical diaphragms.
R:\ORDS\45
d. Assess how adequately the building is tied together in an Overall sense
to allow the. lateral force resisting systems an opportunity to receive the forces they are
designed to resist.
2. Geometry.
a. - Consider how and where torsional (wtation) forces induced by the.
eccentricity of the building center of mass to its center of rigidity, are taken into the hteral
force re, sting system and identify the individual elements which will transmit these addition-
al forces. Assess the potential capacity these elements have to resist the.additional loads
from this source.
b. Consider the effect of discontinuities in the lateral force resisting
systems with regard to the existence of adequate ties, boundary members, chords or drag
struts, etc. to allow redistribution of forces. Assess the capacity of the systems or elements
which would receive the redistributed forces if adequate ties exist.
c. Consider the effects of reentrant comers (including the shape of
individual columns) and assess their contribution to the response of the building at locations
where they occur.
3.' Building Separation.
a. Consider the effects of adjoining buildings, which may have different
vibration periods resulting in non-synchronized movement of the adjacent exterior walls,
placing out of plane impact forces on these walls.
b. Assess the level of drift control, particularly at open storefronts and the
actual physical separation distance between the exterior walls of .the building and adjoining
building walls.
c. Assess condition where the wall of a building on one property provides
support for structural elements of the adjoining property's building.
4. Non-Ductile Reinforced Concrete Frames.
a. Consider non-ductile frames which act alone without. the benefit of
shear walls or braced frames.
b. Assess the level of compression or shear forces due to existing vertical
loads on the critical supporting elements of the frame.
R:\ORDS~45
c. Assess masonry infill walls between frame members and their effect on
the forces a column/beam joint will be subjected to when attempting to transmit lateral forces
into these walls.
5. Precast Concrete Connections.
a. Assess the effects of temperature creep and shrinkage of concrete
surrounding welded insert connections to precast systems and elements.
b. Consider the potential brittle failure of such connections.
6. Non-Structural Elements.
a. Assess the effect that partitions, infill walls, precast concrete exterior
(architectural) elements and ceiling systems, which have considerable strength and stiffness
characteristics, may have on the overall response of the building.
b. Assess the effect of inadvertent bracing by non-structural elements such
as infill walls, stair stringers or other situations of localized restraint on columns.
c. Assess the potential stress concentrations at the unrestrained ends of
columns which may result from partial restraint or bracing of columns.
7. Site Geology.
a. Consider the maximum ground shaking intensity for the building site
and liquefaction potential or susceptibility by using available earthquake hazard maps.
b. Assess any existing site specific geology/mils reports to gauge the
effects that the local conditions may have on the overall response of the building.
R:\ORDS\45
Procedures for Investigation of Unreinforced Masonry Bearing Wall Buildings.
Preliminary Field Survey. Prepare framing plans for roof and floors noting all
beams, trusses or major lintels of all URM piers or pilasters. Prepare elevations of
all URM walls noting all openings in the walls and any discontinuities above the
building base.
B. Special investigations of the following nature must be made:
1. Note all pans of the vertical load carrying system that may act as ties to hteral
load-resisting elements, to determine the elements or systems that may control relative
displacements between the building's base, floors and roof.
2. Note on floor plans all interior crosswalls that are continuous between floors
or floor and roof, even if the connection of such walls to the floor or roof is only by
finishes.
3. Draw the relationship of roof or floor framing and ceiling framing to deter-
mine the extent and method if any, of their inter-connection.
4. Draw the support systems for URM walls that are not continuous to the
building base noting the materials used to provide that support. (i.e., steel, frame, concrete
frame, etc.)
5. Draw on floor and roof plans the extent of sheathing and finish materials and
describe their nature and nailing pattern. Note any difference in material used which could
lead to substantial variations in diaphragm stiffness. Opening of floors or roof adjacent to
URM walls must be noted. Note the type of roofing system currently in place and note if
this roofing is applied directly to the main roof deck or if there are locations where it is on a
cricket or other superimposed deck.
C. Investigation of current anchorage or URM walls to floors and roof. Show the
location of all wall anchors on the floor/roof plans and specify their spacing, size, and
method of connection. Details of the existing anchorage system should be prepared.
Embedded portions of anchors must be exposed to determine this level of detail. A mini-
mum of 2 percent or 2 anchors exposed per floor or roof level should establish avenge
conditions.
D. Investigation of existing URM walls. ,Investigate the following items if they occur in
the building, and determine:
R:\ORD$\45
thickn~s.
The thickness of URM walls at all levels and location of any changes in
2. The rnatcrials used for lintels and masonry arches and their bearing area on
columns or piers.
3. The materials used in columns or piers supporting lintel beams or arches.
4. The height of parapets, cornices, and gable ends of URM walls above the
uppermost existing anchorages.
5. The anchorage or bonding of terra cotta, cast-stone or similar facing to the
back up wythes of brickwork at cornices and other architectural appendages.
6. The coursing of exterior wythcs of masonry, the bonding of wythes of
masonry, and the materials used in each wythe.
7. The condition of mortar joints and areas of lightly unburned brick should be
noted in the wall elevations. Existing cracks in wall elements should also be noted.
E. Testing. The testing of existing anchorage systems must be made to determine an
average capacity. Testing shall be accomplished in accordance with the following require-
ments.
1. Existing Wall Anchors of URM Buildings. Ten (10) percent of existing rod
anchors shall be tested in pullout by an approved testing laboratory. The minimum tested
quantity shall be four (4) per floor or roof level, with two (2) tests at walls with framing
perpendicular to the walls and two (2) at walls with framing parallel to the wall.
The test apparatus shall be supported on the masonry wall at a minimum distance of the wall
thickness from the anchor tested. Where due to obstructions this is not possible, details of
the condition encountered and the alternate method used must be included in the test result
report, with calibration adjustment for conditions where the reaction of the test apparatus
contributes to the tension value of the anchor.
The rod anchor shall be given a preload of 300 points prior to establishing a datum of
recording elongation. The tension test load reported shall be recorded at 1/8" relative
movement of the anchor to the adjacent masonry wall surface.
The testing of existing URM walls to determine the allowable bed-joint shear is required in
accordance with the following requirements.
2. In Place Shear Tests of Brick' Masonry. The bed joints of the outer wythe of
the masonry shall be tested in shear by laterally displacing a single brick relative to the
R:~ORDS\45
B-2
adjacent bricks in that wythe. The opposite head joint of ~e brick to be tested shall be
removed and cleaned prior to testing. Steel bearing plates of the full dimension of the brick
shall be inserted at each end of the test jack. The bearing plates shall not contact the mortar
joint. The minimum quality mortar in 80 percent of the shear tests shall not be less than the
total of 30 psi when reduced to an equivalent zero axial stress. The shear stress shall be
based on the gross area of both bed joints and shall be that at which movement of the
adjacent brick is first observed.
The minimum quantity of tests shall be two (2) per wall or line of wall elements.resisting a
common force (i.e., per story) or one (1) per 1,500 square feet of total URM wall surface,
with a minimum of 8 tests for any building.
The tests should be conducted at least two brick courses above or below the bond course and
be distributed vertically to include a variety of dead load surcharge situations. The exact test
location shall be determined at the building site by the engineer responsible for the investiga-
tion and the distribution of such tests must be approved by the building official prior to
actual testing. In single story buildings, the wall' above the lintel beam at an open storefront
need not be tested.
Standards .for the Analysis and Evaluation of
Unreinforced Masonry Bearing Wall Buildings.
A. Analysis.
1. General
The total lateral seismic forces should be computed in accordance with the following
equation:
V = IKCSW
The value Of KCS need not exceed the value set forth in Table BI-1. The value of !
shall be equal to 1.0..The value of W shall be as set forth in the Uniform Buildin~ Code.
2. Lateral Forces on Elements of Structures.
Pans or portions of buildings and structures shall be analyzed for lateral loads in
accordance with Chapter 23 of the UBC but not less than the value of the following equation:
Fp - ICpSWp
For the provisions of this section, the product of IS need not exceed 1.0. The value of Cp
and Wp shall be as set forth in the UBC.
R:\ORD$~45
Exception: Unreinforc~ masonry walls may be analyzed in accordance with Section Co).
3. The elements of buildings required to be analyzed shall include the following:
Wall height to thickness ratio.
Tension bolts for bending.
In-plane shear forces.
Parapets.
Diaphragm stress and diaphragm-chords at floors and roof.
4. Anchorage and Interconnection.
Anchorage and interconnection of all parts, pertions and elements of the structure
shall be analyzed for hteral forces in accordance with the UBC and the formula in Subsec-
tion 2 above. Masonry walls shall be anchored to all floors or roof to resist a minimum of
200 pounds per linear foot of load per analyses acting normal to the wall at the level of the
floor or roof or will be considered inadequate.
5. Required Analysis.
Except as modified herein, the analysis and recommended structural alteration of the
structure shall be in accordance with the analysis specified in the currently adopted Edition of
the Uniform Building Code. A complete, continuous load path from every part or portion of
the structure to the ground shall be shown to exist for required lateral forces. All parts,
portions or elements of the structure shall be shown to be interconnected by positive means.
6. Analysis Procedure.
Stresses in materials and existing construction utilized to transfer seismic forces from
the ground to pans or pertions of the structure shall conform to those permiRed by the UBC
and those types of materials of construction specified' under the Materials of Construction
Section Co). In addition to the seismic forces required, unreinforced masonry walls shall be
analyzed as specified in the UBC to withstand all vertical loads. When calculating shear or
diagonal tension stresses due to seismic forces, existing masonry shear walls may be allowed
to resist 1.0 times the required forces in lieu of the 1.5 factor required by the UBC. No
allowable tension stress will be permitted in unreinforced masonry walls. Walls not capable
of resisting the required design forces specified in this Appendix shall be deemed inadequate.
Exception: Unreinforced masonry walls which carry no design loads other than their own
weight may be considered as veneer if they are adequately anchored to elements which are
not part of the existing lateral force resisting system.
7. Existing Materials.
R:XORDS\45
B-4
When stress in existing lateral force resisting elements are due to a combination of
dead loads plus live loads plus seismic loads, the allowable working stress specified in the
UBC may be increased 100 percent. However, no increase will be permitted in the stresses
allowed in Section Co). The stresses in members due only to seismic and deal loads shall not
exceed the values permitted in the UBC.
8. Allowable Reduction of Bending. Stress by Vertical Load.
Calculated tensile fiber stress may be reduced by the full direct stress due to vertical
deal loads.
B. Materials of Construction.
1. General
All materials permitted by this Code, including their appropriate allowable stresses
and those existing configurations of material specified herein, may be utilized to show
adequacy of existing construction.
2. Existing Materials.
Unreinforced masonry walls analyzed in accordance with this Appendix may provide
vertical support for roof and floor construction and resistance to lateral loads. The bonding
of such walls shall be as specified in the UBC
Tension stresses due to seismic forces acting normal to the wall may be neglected if the wall
does not exceed the Height to Thickness ratio and the in-plane shear stresses due to seismic
loads set forth in Table B1-2. If the Wall Height or Length to Thickness ratio exceeds the
specified limits, the wall will be considered inadequate unless braced by vertical members
designed to satisfy. the requirement of the UBC. The deflection of such bracing members at
design loads shall not exceed one-tenth of the wall thickness.
Exception: The wall may be supported by flexible vertical bracing members designed in
accordance with the Appendix if the deflection at design spacing of vertical bracing members
shall not exceed one-half the unsupported-height of the wall or ten feet, whichever is less.
3. Existing Roof, Floors, Walls, Footings and Wood Framing.
Existing materials, including wood shear walls may be used as part of the lateral load
resisting system, provided that the stresses in these materials do not exceed the values shown
in Table B 1-3. Wood shear walls may be recommended to strengthen potions of the
existing seismic resisting system.
R:~ORDS\45
Minimum Acceptable Quality of Existing Unreinforced Masonry Walls.
B-5
All unreinforced masonry walls, utiliTt~d tO ~rry vertical loads and seismic forces
parallel and perpendicular w the wall plane shall be tested as specified in Section (e) of the
investigation portion of this appendix. All masonry shall be of a quality not less than the
minimum standards established or shall be considered inadequate. Pointing of mortar of all
masonry wall joints may be performed prior to testing if joints are raked and cleaned to
remove loose and deteriorated mortar. Mortar shall be Type S or N. except masonry
cements shall not be used. All preparation and pointing shall be donc under the continuous
inspection of a special inspector, whose reports shall be included in the final report.
5~
Results.
Determination of Allowable Stresses for Design Methods Based on Test
Design seismic in-plan shear stresses shall be related to test results in accordance with
Table Bl-4. Intermediate values between 3 and 10 psi may be interpolated.
Compression stresses for unreinforced masonry having a minimum design shear value of 3
psi shill not exceed 100 psi. Design tension values for unreinforeed masonry shall not be
permitted.
6. Construction Details.
All unreinforced masonry wills shall be anchored at all floors and 'roof with tension
bolts through the wall or by existing rod anchors at a maximum spacing of six feet. All
existing rod anchors shill be secured to the joists to develop the required forces. Testing of
the existing rod anchors shill be conducted according to Section (e) of the investigation
portion of this appendix.
Diaphragm chord stresses of horizontal diaphragms shill be developed in existing materials
or be considered inadequate.
Where trusses or beams other than rafters and joists are supported on masonry piers, these
piers must be shown to provide adequate support during seismic loading.
Parapets and exterior will appendages not capable of resisting the forces specified in this
Appendix shill be considered hazardous, and the methods for property anchorage must be
developed."
R:\ORDS\45
Section 19. City Ordinance No. 92-14 adopted certain divisions of decision-making
authority for land use and subdivision applications. Said Ordinance is hereby amended by
the replacement of "Exhibit A" thereto with the revised "Exhibit A" attn_ched hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference. Furthermore, said Ordinance is amended to provide
that no public hearing is required by the City for any map extensions or final map appwvals
for subdivision maps previously approved by Riverside County when the City of Temecula
has held at least one public hearing on the map.
Section 20. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of
this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold
any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decisions shall not
affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 21. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall
cause the same to be posted as required by law.
Section 22. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty
(30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance
and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated pos,ting places.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this
day of , 199_.
J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R:\ORDS~45
18
ITEM NO. 13
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning-
February 9, 1993
An Urgency Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula Declaring a
Moratorium on the Establishment of Nightclubs, Teen Clubs, Dance Halls, Bars
and Cocktail Lounges, Billiard Halls, Massage Parlors, and Video Game Arcades
Without a Conditional Use Permit
PREPARED BY:
Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the City
Council:
Adopt an Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA DECLARING A MORATORIUM ON THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF NIGHTCLUBS, TEEN CLUBS, DANCE
HALLS, BARS AND COCKTAIL LOUNGES, BILLlARD HALLS,
MASSAGE PARLORS, AND VIDEO GAME ARCADES WITHOUT
A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
BACKGROUND
Ordinance No. 92-05 was adopted by the City Council on April 9, 1992. Ordinance No. 92-
05 was entitled: "An Urgency Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula declaring
a moratorium on the establishment of nightclubs, teen clubs and dance halls without a
Conditional Use Permit." Staff was directed by the City Council to prepare this ordinance at
the meeting of February 11, 1992. This direction was provided in response to an incident
which occurred at Valley Beat Teen Club. Ordinance No. 92-05 was in effect for 45 days and
expired on May 23, 1992.
DISCUSSION
Staff has prepared the current ordinance in order to continue the moratorium on nightclUbs,
teen clubs and dance halls. Bars and Cocktail lounges, billiard halls, massage parlors and video
game arcades are now proposed to be added to the list of uses which will require a
Conditional Use Permit. These uses pose potential conflicts with adjacent uses and it is staff
opinion that the public health and safety would be better served byimposing the moratorium.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~CLUBS.CC 2/1/93 klb
Staff is currently drafting a permanent ordinance which will amend Ordinance No. 348 and
which will require that a Conditional Use Permit be granted for the above mentioned uses.
This ordinance will tentatively be before the Planning Commission in March, 1993 and
tentatively before the City Council in April, 1993.. Staff is requesting that the City Council
provide direction relative to the types of uses that should be included in the permanent
ordinance.
FISCAL IMPACT.
None.
Attachments:
1. Ordinance No. 93- - Page 3
R:~S\STAFFRPT%CLUBS.CC 2/1/93 klb 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
R:\S\STAFFRPT~CLUBS.CC 1/29193 klb 3
ORDINANCE NO.
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING A
MORATORIUM ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
NIGHTCLUBS, TEEN CLUBS, DANCE HALLS, BARS
AND COCKTAIl. LOUNGES, BILLIARD HALLS,
MASSAGE PARLORS, AND VIDEO GAME ARCADES
WITHOUT A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF. EULA DOES ~Y ORDAIN AS
FOI/-OWS:
Section 1. Findings That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
findings:
A. That it is the Mission of the City of Temecula to maintain a safe, secure, clean,
healthy and orderly community;
B. That it is necessary to re-examine the regulations of the zoning ordinance relating
to the establishment of nightclubs, teen clubs, dance halls, bars and cocktail lounges, billlard
halls, massage parlors, and video game arcades without a conditional use permit;
C. That it is necessary, pending conduct of such study and the enactment of
regulations based thereon, that a moratorium on the establishment of nightclubs, teen clubs,
dance halls, bars and coclctail lounges, billiard halls, massage parlors, and video game arcades
without a conditional use permit be imposed pending the completion of such study;
D. That ff such moratorium were not imposed, establishment of such nightclubs, teen
clubs, dance halls, bars and cocktail lounges, billiard halls, massage parlors, and video game
arcades without a conditional use permit would be undertaken that may compromise the public
health, safety and weftare.
Section 2. That notwithstanding any provision of the City of Temecula Ordinance 90-04,
during such time as this ordinance is in full force and effect, no person shall establish a
nightclub, teen club, dance hall, bar and cocktail lounge, billlard hall, massage parlor, and video
game arcade without a conditional use permit. No officer, employee or agent; of the City shall
issue any permit or other entitlement which would have the effect of allowing a nightclub, teen
club, dance hall, bar and cocktail lounge, billlard hall, massage parlor, and video game arcade
without a conditional use permit, during such time as this ordinance is in full force and effect,
and in addition, any permit or other entitlement issued shall be revoked. Should any party in
receipt of such permit or entitlement believe that they have a vested fight to establish such a
nightclub, teen club, dance hall, bar and cocktail lounge, billlard hall, massage parlor, and video
game arcade without a conditional use permit or would suffer hardship if not permitted to
establish such uses without a conditional use permit may apply for an exemption from this
R:\S\STAFFRPT~CLUBS.CC 1/29/93 klb 4
ordinance. Such exemption may be granted by the City Council only upon recommendation
from the Planning Comm{ssion and after due notice and public hearlug of both bodies.
Section 3. Thi.~ Ordinance is enacted under'the authority of the California Government
Code Section 65858 (b) and shah be of no further force and effect 45 days from the date of
adoption of thi.~ Ordinance unless the City Council has extended this Ordinance in the manner
as provided in said' Section 65858 (b).
Seaion 4, Thi.~ Ordinance is adopted pursuant to Government Code Section 65858 and
is hereby declared an urgency measure and shall take effect immediately.
Section S. The City Clerk shah certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and 'cause
copies of this Ordinance to be posted and published as required by law.
PASSED, APPROVEI) AND ADOP'II~ this 9th day of February, 1993.
ATTEST:
J. SAt, Mu oz
MAYOR
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNT~ OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECUI~ )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Urgency Ordinance No. 93- was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of
the City Council on the 9th day of February, 1993, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0
COUNCrf-MEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R:%S%STAFFRPT~CLUB$.CC 1129/93 klb 5
ITEM NO. 14
APPROVAT. ~,~
FCITY ATTORNEY-
INANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM:
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer and
Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services
DATE:
February 9, 1993
SUBJECT:
Boys and Girls Club Project
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council review project timing and appoint two
members of the City Council to an adhoc review committee for the Boys and Girls
Club Project.
-DISCUSSION: On January 26, 1993, Council approved a $20,000 loan to
the Boys and Girls Club to prepare working drawings for the Boys and Girls Club
facility on Pujol Street. The working drawings will allow the Boys and Girls Club to
obtain firm construction quotes instead of estimates for the project. Staff has met
with representatives of the Boys and Girls Club to develop a construction plan for the
facility. In order to expedite the construction process and maintain cost efficiency,
the project has been divided into two phases; site development (Phase I); and
construction of the facility (Phase II). The construction table for this project is as
follows:
Solicit bids - Phase I
2-1-93
Select grading contractor - Phase I
2-16-93
Request funding for Phase I and
provide construction estimates for Phase II
2-23-93
Solicit bids - Phase II
3-1-93
Select construction contractor - Phase II
3-15-93
Request funding - Phase II
3-23-93
Complete construction 6-15-93
This process will allow an opportunity for the Boys and Girls Club to request donations
of money and in kind services from those bidding on the work and organize
community fund raisers, Further, the requests for funding for the Boys and Girls Club
will be based on construction quotes from approved working drawings.
ITEM NO.
15
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
City Manager
February 9, 1993
Ad Hoc Committee - CFD 88-12
PREPARED BY:
City Clerk June Greek
RECOMMENDATION: Discuss formation of an Ad Hoc Committee and if desired, select
two members to serve in this capacity.
BACKGROUND: At the City Council meeting of January 26, 1993, Councilmember Parks
suggested that an Ad Hoc Committee be established to oversee the Ynez Corridor Project.
If it is the desire of the City Council, it is recommended that two members be selected to
serve in this capacity.
jsg
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA
ITEM
NO.
1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES 'DISTRICT
TUESDAY, JANUARY 12, 1993
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order
Tuesday, January 12, 1992, 8:10 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol
Street, Temecula, California. President Patricia H. Birdsall presiding.
PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Mufioz, Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Parks
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were City Manager David Dixon, City Attorney Scott Field and City Clerk June
S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Director Mur~oz, seconded by Director Stone to approve Consent Calendar
Items 1 - 3.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Mufioz, Parks, Roberrs, Stone,
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
1.
Minutes
1.1
Approve the minutes of November 24, 1992.
e
Reduction of Landscaoe Bond for Tract No. 22915-0, Vintaqe Hills
2.1
Authorize the reduction of Landscape Improvement Bond amounts for
TCSD maintenance areas within Tract No. 22915-0 Vintage Hills.
CombininQ Balance Sheet as of Seotember 30.1992 and the Statement of Revenues.
Expenditures and Chanqes in Fund Balance for the Three Months Ended Seotember 30.
.19~)2
CSDMIN 1 / 1 2193 - 1 - 1120193
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MINUT;S JANUARY 12, 1993
3.1 Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30,
1992 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in
Fund Balance for the Three Months ended September 30, 1992.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
Namino of the Park Site on Pala Road
Shawn Nelson presented the staff report.
President Birdsall suggested that the public be involved in the naming of the park site.
It was moved by Director Roberts, seconded by Director Parks to continue this item
and direct staff to work with the Parks and Recreation Commission and suggest
community participation.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Mufioz, Parks, Roberts, Stone,
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT
None
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
None
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORT
Director Parks requested a report on the recent storm effect on the Community Service
District facilities.
President Birdsall advised she has been re-appointed to the League of California Cities
Community Services Committee.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Muftoz, seconded by Director Parks to adjourn at 8:20 P.M.
CSDMIN 111 2193 -2- 1120193
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MINUTES
JANUARY 12, 1993
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District will be held on
Tuesday, January 26, 1993, 8:00 P.M., Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street,
Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
President Patricia H. Birdsall
June S. Greek, City Clerk/
Community Services District Secretary
CSDMIN1 I12193 °3- 1120193
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD JANUARY 26, 1993
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:45
PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Mur~oz, Parks, Roberrs, Stone
Birdsall
PM.
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field and June S.-
Greek, City Clerk.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Parks to approve Consent Calendar
Items 1-3.- The motion was unanimously carried.
e
Storm DamaQe RePort - City Parks and Recreation Facilities
1.1
Receive and file Storm Damage Report concerning City Parks and
Recreation Facilities.
Contract Amendment for Wimmer Yamada Associates - Pala Road Park Site
Approve amendment to contract with Wimmer Yamada Associates
(WYA) to provide additional engineering and architectural services for
the Pala Road Park Site;
2.2
Appropriate $17,000 in the capital projects fund (210-190-120-5802)
from fund balance.
Contract Amendment to Mentone Turf SUDDIV - Loma Linda Park
3.1
Approve amendment to contract with Mentone Turf to install two (2)
handicap accessible concrete drinking fountains at Loma Linda Park.
Minutes.csd/O12693 -1 - 01128193
CSD Minutes
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
None given.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT
None given.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
None given.
DIRECTORS REPORTS
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Parks to adjourn at 8:47 PM to a
meeting on February 9, 1993, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula,
California. The motion was unanimously carried.
January .~>6. 1993
Patricia H. Birdsall, President
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk/TCSD Secretary
Minute.,.csd/012693 -2- 01128193
ITEM NO.
2
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS'
FROM:
DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER
DATE:
FEBRUARY 9, 1993
SUBJECT:
LOMA LINDA PARK IMPROVEMENTS
PREPARED BY: RY L. KING, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ADMINISTRATOR
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
Authorize the purchase of picnic tables, benches, trash receptacles and
barbecue units from Walt Rankin and Associates at $10,419 for Loma Linda
Park·
Award contract of $39,097 to Oakridge Landscape and Irrigation for the
installation of landscaping, picnic tables, benches, trash receptacles and
barbecue units at Loma Linda Park.
DISCUSSION: The approved Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for FY 1993-97
haS $200,000 budgeted for Phase I improvements to Loma Linda Park. In accordance
with the City's purchasing ordinance, staff solicited formal bids for drainage
improvements, fine grading, soil preparation, hydroseeding, and installation of trees,
picnic tables, benches, trash receptacles, and barbecue units at Loma Linda Park (site
location map attached). On January 14, 1993, the City Clerk opened the following
acceptable bids:
1. Oakridge Landscaping $ 39,097
2. Mentone Turf Supply 40,695
3. William Murray Engineering 46,772
4. KruegerLandscape 46,869
5. Artistic Landscape Engineering 60,385
6. BoPark Enterprises 67,506
7. Rivere Irrigation 68,684
Based upon the results of this bid opening, it is recommended that a contract of
$39,097 be awarded to Oakridge Landscape and Irrigation as the lowest qualified
bidder.
Also, staff has negotiated a purchase of picnic tables, benches, trash receptacles, and
barbecue units from Walt Rankin and Associates for a total amount of $10,419. This
is a sole source purchase because the type of PVC material for vandalism purposes
is only provided by Walt Rankin and Associates.
FISCAL IMPACT: Cost to purchase and install park improvements is $49,516.
Sufficient funds are budgeted in CIP account number 210-190-134-5804.
Z
<
Z
7
CITY OF TEMECULA, COMMUNITY SERVICE DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO.. CSD 92-01
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 9ffi day of February, 1993, by and between
the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and Oak~idge
Landscape and Inigalion, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as
· follows:
1.8.
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents,
to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and
Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. CSD 92-01, Insurance
Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, and the latest version
of the Standard Soecifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as
written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California
Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter,
"Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions,
and Plans and Specifications for PROJECT NO. CSD 92-01. Copies of these Standard
Specifications are available from 'the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and
construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the Plans and Specifications
of this Contract.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents,
the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such
conflicting portions.
Where the Plans or Specifications describe portions of the work in general terms, but not
in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed
and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise
specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and
incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
CONTRACT CA-1
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as
binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract
Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall
provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all
utility and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. CSD 92-4)1
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance
with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents
hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished
and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the
approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE.. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to
accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: Thirty Nine
Thousand and Ninety Seven DOLLARS and No CENTS ($39,097.00), the total amount of
the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed Thirty (30) working
days, commencing with delivery of Notice tO Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not
commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that
the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order,
changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the .contingency as
established by the City Council.
PAYMENTS. On or about the 30th day of the month next following the commencement
of the work, there shall be paid to the CONTRACTOR a sum equal to 90 percent of the
value of the work completed since the commencement of the work. Thereafter, on or
about the 30th day of each successive month as the work progresses, the CONTRACTOR
shall be paid such sum as will bring the payments each month up to 90 percent of the
previous payments, provided that tile CONTRACTOR submits his request for payment prior
to the last.day of each preceding month. The final payment, if payment prior to the last
day of each preceding month. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof
unencumbered, shall be made 60 days after CITY acceptance of the work and the
CONTRACTOR filing a one year warranty with the CITY on a warranty form provided by
the CITY. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law,
accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which
payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract,
and the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial
payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the
work.
CONTRACT CAo2
8
9
10.
WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is
recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure guaranty
performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following
schedule:
CONTRACT
AMOUNT
RETENTION RETENTION
PERIOD PERCENTAGE
925,000-975,000 One Year 3%
975,000-9500,000 One Year
9 2,250 plus 2% of contract amount exceeding
1975,000
Over 9500,000
One Year
910,750 plus 1% of contract amount exceeding
9500,000
Failure by the CONTRACTOR to take corrective action within 24 hours after personal or
telephone notice by the City on items affecting use of facility, safety, or deficiencies will
result in the CITY taking whatever corrective action it deems necessary. All costs resulting
from such action by the CITY will be deducted from the retention. The amount of retention
provided for herein shall no be deemed a limitation upon the responsibility of the
CONTRACTOR to carry out the terms of the Contract Documents.
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code
Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One
Thousand Dollars (9100.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond
the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted
from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be
deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR
will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for
unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or negligence of .the
CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly
notify CITY of any such delay.
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. Unless a.shorter time is'specified elsewhere in this Contract, on or
before making final request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR sh'all
submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation under or arising out of this Contract;
the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of the final payment shall constitute a waiver of all
claims against CITY under or arising out of this Contract except those previously made in
writing and request for payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit,
release and indemnify agreement with each claim for payment.
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the
State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of .per diem
wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft,
classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Dire=ctor of
the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies
may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post
a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates
CONTRACT CA-3
¸11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775,
1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
CITY, as a penalty, the sum of 925.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, foreach
laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any
work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of
the provisions of the Contract.
LIABILITY INSURANCE. CONTRACTOR, by executing this Agreement, hereby certifies:
"1 am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every
employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or undertake self-
insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such
provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract."
TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this Contract.
INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or
in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone.
CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers,
employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly
out of the obligations heroin undertaken or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
CONTRACTOR'S INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION. No plea of ignorance of conditions that
exist or that may hereafter exist or of conditions of difficulties that may be encountered in
the execution of the work under this Contract, as a result of failure to make the necessary
independent examinations and investigations, and no plea of reii~nce on initial investigations
or reports prepared by CITY for purposes of letting this Contract out to bid will be accepted
as an excuse for any failure or omission on the part of the CONTRACTOR to fulfill in every
detail all requirements of this Contract. Nor will such reasons be accepted as a basis for
any claims whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or
representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable
treatment with respect thereto.
CONFLICT O'F INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee,
or any architect, engineer, or other puerperal of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been
employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon
CONTRACT CA-4
18.
19.
20.
21.
the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the
Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been
filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR
CorPorations:
The signature must contain the name of the corporation, must be signed by the President
and Secretary or Assistant Secretary, and the corporate seal must be affixed. Other
persons may sign for the corporation in lieu of the above if a certified copy of a resolution
-of the corporate board of directors so authorizing them to do so is on file in the City Clerk's
office.
Partnerships:
The names of all persons comprising the partnership or co-partnership must be stated. The
bid must be signed by all partners comprising the partnership unless proof in the form of
a certified copy of a certificate of partnership acknowledging the signer to be a general
partner is presented to the City Clerk, in which case the general partner may sign.
Joint Ventures:
Bids submitted as joint ventures must so state and be signed by each joint venturer.
Individuals:
Bids submitted by individuals must be signed by the bidder, unless an up-to-date power of
attorney is on file in the City Clerk's office, in which case said person may sign for the
individual.
The above rules also apply in the case of the use of a fictitious firm name. In addition,
however, where the fictitious name is used, it must be so indicated in the signature.
SUBSTITUTED SECURITY. In accordance with Section 22300 of the Public Contracts
Code, CONTRACTOR may substitute securities for any monies withheld by the CITY to
ensure performance under the Contract. At the request and expense of the CONTRACTOR,
securities equivalent to the amount withheld shall be deposited with the CITY or with a
State or Federally Chartered bank or an escrow agent who shall pay such monies to the
CONTRACTOR upon notification by CITY of CONTRACTOR's satisfactory completion of the
Contract. The type of securities deposited and the method of release shall be approved by
the. City Attorney's office.
RESOLUTION OF CLAIMS. Any dispute or claim arising out of this Contract shall be
arbitrated pursuant to Section 10240 of the California Public Contracts Code.
NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any
actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of
CONTRACT CA-5
22.
23.
24.
25.
the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all 'relevant
information with respect thereto, to CITY.
BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof
as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be
subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
UTILITY LOCATION. CITY acknowledges its responsibilities with respect to locating utility
facilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 4215.
REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTERS. CONTRACTOR agrees to contact the appropriate
regional notification center in accordance with Government Code Section 4216.2.
TRENCH PROTECTION AND EXCAVATION. CONTRACTOR shall submit its detailed plan
for worker protection during the excavation of trenches required by the scope of the work
in accordance with Labor Code Section 6705.
CONTRACTOR shall, without disturbing the condition, notify CITY in writing as soon
as CONTRACTOR, or any of CONTRACTOR's subcontractors, agents, or employees
have knowledge and reporting is possible, of the discovery of any of the following
conditions:
The presence of any material that the CONTRACTOR believes is hazardous
waste, as defined in Section 25117 of the Health and Safety Code;
ii.
Subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site differing from those
indicated in the specifications; or
III.
Unknown physical conditions at the site of any unusual nature, different
materially for. those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as
inherent in work of the character provided for in this Contract.
Pending a determination by the CITY of appropriate action to be taken,
CONTRACTOR shall provide security measures (e.g., fences) adequate to prevent
the hazardous waste or physical conditions from causing bodily injury to any person.
CITY shall promptly investigate the reported conditions: If CITY', through, and in the
exercise of its sole discretion, determines that the conditions do materially differ, or
do involve hazardous waste, and will cause a decrease or increase in the
CONTRACTOR's cost of, or time required for, performance of any part of the work,
then CITY shall issue a change order.
In the event of a dispute between CITY and CONTRACTOR as to whether the
conditions materially differ, or involve hazardous waste, or cause a decrease or
increase in the CONTRACTOR's cost of, or. time required for, performance of any
part of the work, CONTRACTOR shall not be excused from any scheduled
completion date, and shall proceed with all work to be performed under the contract.
CONTRACTOR shall retain any and all rights which pertain to the resolution of
disputes and protests between the parties.
CONTRACT CA-6
26.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all. other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety 'and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as
to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance
notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be
made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
27.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin,
color, sex, age, or handicap.
28.
GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by
the law of the State of California.
29.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and
to the CITY addressed as follows:
Gary L. King, Development Services Administrator
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date
first above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR
By:
Print or type NAME
Print or type TITLE
DATED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Patricia~H. Birdsall, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CONTRACT CA-7
w~x~= ~XN~ZN ~m xssocn~zs, zNc. =" DEC
P,O. BOX 2156 "
~ M~SA ~. 9~943
Tmle~one 619/460- 62
cZT~ OF ~ECU~/nO~ LZND~ ~X~V OF ~ C~/~
12/~4/92 N~ 30 PREPAY & ~D VERB~ 40
........................................ ,,~ ...................................
Quantity N~el ~ Description j Priue -- Each. Tot.
5 1129 t 'T 199.00 995.00
5 1104-4 Park Grill ~' 90.00 450.00
6 1158-2 PVC Sm Picnic Table,=In Ground 421.00 2526.00
3 1142 PVC Therapeutio'Tabl~- In Ground 400.00 1200.00
COMMENTs:
1156-1-6 DARK BLUE,
3 BROWN, 1267-3 DXRK BLUE, 3 BROWN, 1129
,I
i'
Subtotal
Freight
Installation
Total Order
401.00
1078.00
579.62
2360.00
10418.62
ITEM
NO.
3
APPROV~T. ~~
iITY ATTORNEY ,,' ~CJ
NANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FROM:
DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER
DATE:
FEBRUARY 9, 1993
SUBJECT:
PALOMA DEL SOL PARK MASTER PLAN
PREPARED BY: t~GARY L. KING, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ADMINISTRATOR
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
1. Approve master plan for the Paloma Del Sol Park Site.
e
Approve preliminary fee credits of $1,368,000 towards City Public Facilities
Fees for the development of this park site.
DISCUSSION: On December 8, 1992, the City Council approved an
Amendment and Restatement of the Development Agreement between the City of
Temecula .and Bedford Development Company and Mesa Homes concerning the
Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan No. 219. Pursuant to this amended development
agreement, Bedford is required to deliver to the City a fully developed eight (8) acre
park site located within planning area 37, tract 25417 of the specific plan (see
attached location map) on or before June 30, 1993.
Further, in consideration of developing this eight (8) acre site and a future 7.44 acre
site, Bedford shall receive a credit for both park sites up to a total maximum credit of
$2,000,000 towards City Public Facilities Fees based on actual improvement costs.
However, the amount of fee credits for each park must be reviewed, audited, and
verified by the City and mutually agreed upon by both parties.
On December 14, 1992, the Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the master
plan for this park site which includes two (2) baseball fields with soccer overlays and
lights, rest room and concession facility, bleachers, landscaping, signage, flag poles,
drinking fountains, refuse receptacles, meandering concrete walkways, and parking.
The Commission recommended approval of the master plan with the following
recommendations:
1. No alcoholic beverages be sold at adjacent commercial sites.
A tot lot play area be added to the master plan only if feasible, and if the tot
lot would not interfere with the existing configuration and dimensions of the ball,.
fields.
Staff has reviewed the status of the commercial property adjacent to the park site and
has determined that all impending improvements to the commercial property will
require approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. To date, no
commercial improvements have been approved.
Further, staff has investigated the feasibility of installing a tot lot to the existing
master plan and is recommending not to install a tot lot due to safety issues and area
constraints. It is therefore recommended that the master plan for this park site be
approved as submitted to the Parks and Recreation Commission.
A presentation will be. made concerning the master plan for this park site.
FISCAL IMPACT: A preliminary construction estimate of $1,368,000 has
been submitted to the City by Bedford Properties. Staff has reviewed this estimate
with the Alhambra Group, a landscape architectural firm, to verify the construction
estimates associated with developing this site. As a result, staff is recommending a
preliminary credit of $1,368,000 towards City Public Facilities Fees for the
development of this park site. However, the final credit received by Bedford will be
based on actual construction costs that are verified by the City.
~ Kemper Real Estate Management COmpany
27555 Ynez Road. Suite 200. Temecula, Califomia 92591 · 714/676-7290 · Fax: 714/694-5'687
I
IIIdl ~lll~l I I
I I
January 14, 1993
JAN 1 --:'- 1993
Mr. Shawn Nelson
Director of Community Services
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
COMMU:,.ZiTY SERVICES
Cost Estimate/Paloma De1 Sol 8.75 Acre Park
Dear Shawn,
As promised, attached please find the development cost estimate
for the above-referenced park. This estimate includes all the
components for which KRDC, Inc. will expect fee credits
pursuant to the Amended Development Agreement..Please remember
that the final credit amount will be based on actual
construction costs.
Please call if you have any questions.
Csaba F. Ko
Vice President
CFl(:cz
EncL.
Snmmary of
On-Site Development Cost Estimate for
8.75 Acre Public Park loeate~ @
DePortola Road and Campanula Way
In Paloma Del Sol
Design Costs:
Civil Engineering (RBF):
I,amdscape An:biter (LandConcern):
Building Design (Ar~hit~tural Arts)
Plumbing & Electrical Consultant 0BE)
Budget
$12,000
$13,000
$1,200
Sl,ooo
; Coatra~t
$9,700
$12,600
$1,200
$1,ooo
'Construction Cost Estimam (On-Site):fper RBF Estimate):
O~d~g
Parking Lot
$234 3OO
$50,304
$7,596
Park Sire Landsc, aping:Cner.~!iand ?Concan Estimam)!":
Hardseap~
Amenities
Lighting
Landscape & Irrigation
$54,737
$50,090
$265,600
~59,129
Rec Building:(per Westfall Bid dated 1/13/93) : ~:,:: $118;93757~5:!iiii~:~ :: ::: i:
Fees & Permits : (Estimates Only)
City (on-site) Plan Ck, & hasp.
Building Penrot
Health Dept, Permit
SCE Design and Deposit
K- Rat Fees($1950/AC)
Sewer Capacity Fee
3/4' water meter fee (RCWD Installed)
2' imgation Service (RCWD Installed)
RCWD Primary Facility Fee($1350/AC)
$1,500
$2,000
$17,063
$9,00O
$4,243
$9,64O
$11,813
Constuction Engineering:
Construction Surveying
Soil Testing
DM/Jan. 12, 199~'
SUB-TOTAL:
10% CouL
$8,ooo
$12,000
$1,243,650
$124,365
January'26, 1993
ALHAMBRA (~ROUP
Lende~epe Arohite~ture
Iia. #B017
Mr. Gary King
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
RE: 8.75 Acre in Paloma Del Sol
Review of Preliminary Budget Estimate
Bear Mr. King:
Our office has reviewed the budget estimate for the above
mentioned project and have found the unit costs to be
acceptable. Our comments were mainly questions concerning
the_type of equipment for the play areas and the quantity of
light poles being installed. We are assuming the lighting
estimate is for ballfield/playfield lighting and there would
be approximately 4 to 5 poles for the park. All other items
seem to be good estimates for this project.
Please contact our office if you have any further questions
regarding this letter or the budget estimate.
Sincerely,
Vincent Di. Donato
Landscape-Architect #2017
VD/rv
27412 Enterprise Circle West, Suite ~300. Ternacute. CA 92590 E~14] 878-0226 FAX ~14] 894-1587
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM
NO.
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
HELD JANUARY 26, 1993
A regular meeting of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 8:47 PM.
PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs,
Stone, Mufloz
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
Also present were Executive Director David F. Dixon, General Counsel Scott F. Field and
Agency Secretary June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
AGENCY BUSINESS
1. Minutes
1.1 Approve the minutes of January 12, 1993.
It was moved by Member Mu~oz, seconded by Member Stone to approve the minutes
of January 12, 1993. The motion was unanimously carried.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
None given.
GENERAL COUNSEL'S REPORT
None given.
AGENCY MEMBERS REPORTS
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Member Stone, seconded by Member Roberrs to adjourn at 8:50 PM to a
meeting on February 2, 1993, 6:00 PM, Temecula City Hall, 43174 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried.
· RDA.M~N\012693 - l- 01/28/93
Temecula Redevelopment Agency Minutes January 26. 1993
Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S.. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary
RDAMIN~012693 -2- 01/28/93