The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About052593 CC AgendaAGFNnA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER - 28816 Pujol Street MAY 25, 1993 - 7:00 PM At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM end may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 99-1 Resolution: No. 9~-39 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor J. Sal Mu~oz presiding Invocation Pastor Nick La Bruno, Calvary Chapel of Temecula Flag Salute Councilmember Parks ROLL CALL: Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Muftoz PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Award of Valor - Juaneice Riggs Inland Empire Design Institute Achievement Award for Old Town Specific Plan PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed on the Agenda or on the consent Calendar, a pink "Request To Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address. For all other agenda items a "Request To Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. 2/eee~de/Oe 1 01120~3 (Southbound Maskuaz Court. ~ East Loma Linda Road, Southbound Via Consuelo ~ Loma Linda Road, Southbound Esplendor Court e Loma Linda Road, Northbound · Esmerado Court ~ Loma Linda Road and Westbound East Loma Linda Road L~ Loma Linda Road) RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING STOP SIGNS. 6 "No Parkino" Zone - Rancho California Road at Via Las Colinas RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93--- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING' ZONE ON RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT VIA LAS COLINAS Installation of Stop SiQn Control and the Intersection of Mercedes and Sixth Streets RECOMMENDATION 7.1 Adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93-- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING STOP SIGNS AT THE INTERSECTION OF MERCEDES AND SIXTH STREET Solicitation of Bids for the FY 93-94 Annual Street Maintenance Proaram RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Authorize the Public Works Department to solicit bids implementation of the FY 93-94 Street Maintenance Program. 9 Final Parcel MaD No. 24586 for the 21egoride/081280 3 0~11 g/13 (Southbound Maskuaz Court @ East Loma Linda Road, SouthboUnd Via Consuelo @ Loma Linda Road, Southbound Esplendor Court @ Loma Linda Road, Northbound Esmerado Court @ Loma Linda Road and Westbound East Loma Linda Road @ Loma Linda Road) RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING STOP SIGNS. 6 "No Parkina" Zone - Rancho California Road at Via Las Colinas RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING 'NO PARKING' ZONE ON RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT VIA LAS COLINAS Installation of Stoo Sian Control and the Intersection of Mercedes and Sixth Streets RECOMMENDATION 7.1 Adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93-._ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING STOP SIGNS AT THE INTERSECTION OF MERCEDES AND SIXTH STREET 8 Solicitation of Bids for the FY 93-94 Annual Street Maintenance Proaram RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Authorize the Public Works Department to solicit bids implementation of the FY 93-94 Street Maintenance Program. 9 Final Parcel MaD No. 24586 2/e~ende/061290 for the 06118/93 12 Amendment to Ordinance Regulatina TemDorarv Signs RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Uphold the Planning Commission recommendation and deny the Ad-hoc Temporary Sign Committee's proposed amendments to the Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs (Ordinance No. 92-16). 12.2 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 93- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 348 AND 92-16 PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF TEMPORARY SIGNS 13 Vestina Tentative Tract MaD 26941. Change of Zone No. 22 A subdivision consisting of 133 acres Northerly of DePortola Road, southerly of Pauba Road and Easterly of Butterfield Stage Road, RECOMMENDATION: 13, 1 Affirm the Planning Commission recommendation to approve the project COUNCIL BUSINESS 14 Appointment of Planning Commission Member RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Review the Ad-Hoc Committee recommendations and appoint one applicant to serve a full three-year term on the Temecula Planning Commission. 15 Lease of Microfilm EQuiPment RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Approve a lease with Burtronics for a City-wide Microfilm Reproduction System implement the City's Records Management Program DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY MANAGER REPORT ,/,.--- 21mgend~/O81280 K O6/11/13 12 Amendment to Ordinance Reaulatina TemPorary Sians RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Uphold the Planning Commission recommendation and deny the Ad-hoc Temporary Sign Committee's proposed amendments to the Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs (Ordinance No. 92-16). 12.2 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 93- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 348 AND 92-16 PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF TEMPORARY SIGNS 13 Vestinq Tentative Tract Mao 26941. Chanae of Zone No. 22 A subdivision consisting of 133 acres Northerly of DePortola Road, southerly of Pauba Road and Easterly of Butterfield Stage Road. RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Affirm the Planning Commission recommendation to approve the project COUNCIL BUSINESS 14 Appointment Of Plannina Commission Member RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Review the Ad-Hoc Committee recommendations and appoint one applicant to serve a full three-year term on the Temecula Planning Commission. 15 Lease of Microfilm Eauioment RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Approve a lease with Burtronics for a City-wide Microfilm Reproduction System implement the City's Records Management Program DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY MANAGER REPORT , ,.-- 21eoend~Oe 1290 6 06/1 i/R3 ~TEME'CULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING - (To be held at 8:00) Next in Order: CALL TO ORDER: President Patricia H. Birdsall Ordinance: No. 93- Resolution: No. 93- ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Mufioz, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak= to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR CombininQ Balance Sheet and Statement of Revenues. Expenditures and Chanaes in Fund Balance for the Nine (9) Months Ended March 31. 1993. RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Receive and File Report 2 Acceptance of Mass Grading for the Community Recreation Center Phase 1 - PW 92- 029 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Accept the mass grading for the Community Recreation Center - Phase 1, project 92-029 as complete and direct the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion. 2.2 Accept a one-year Maintenance Bond (10% of contract amount) and authorize release of the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. ~ 21aeerd~lO81290 7 O6/11/13 Next in Order: Resolution: No. 92- CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Roberts, Parks Stone, Mu~oz, PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. AGENCY BUSINESS 1 Combinine Balance Sheet and Statement of Revenues. Exoenditures and ChanQes in Fund Balance for the Nine (9) Months Ended March 31, 1993 RECOMMENDATION: .' 1.1 Receive and File Report. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting June 8, 1993, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816, Temecula, California. 21ageride/061290 0611 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING - (To be held at 8:00l Next in Order: CALL TO ORDER: President Patricia H. Birdsall Ordinance: No. 93- Resolution: No. 93- ROLL CALL: PUBLIC COMMENT: DIRECTORS: Mufioz, Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Birdsall Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and stat~ your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR Combining Balance Sheet and Statement of Revenues. Expenditures and Chanaes in Fund Balance for the Nine (9) Months Ended March 31.1993. RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Receive and File Report 2 AccePtance of Mass Gradina for the Community Recreation Center Phase 1 - PW 92- 029 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Accept the mass grading for the Community Recreation Center - Phase 1, project 92-029 as complete and direct the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion. 2.2 Accept a one-year Maintenance Bond (10% of contract amount) and authorize release of the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. ~ 2t.egende/061290 7 0611 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETINn Next in Order: Resolution: No. 92- CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Roberrs, Parks Stone, Mu~oz, PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. AGENCY BUSINESS Combinina Balance Sheet and Statement of Revenues. Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Nine (9) Months Ended March 31. 1993 RECOMMENDATION: .' 1.1 Receive and File Repo~. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting June 8, 1993, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816, Temecula, California. ~ 2/egend,m/O612i~0 il 0611 AR;NnA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER -28816 Pujol 8treat MAY 25, 1993 - 7:00 PM At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on whicR additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 99-1 Resolution: No. 9.~-39 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor J. Sai Mur~oz presiding Invocation Pastor Nick La Bruno, Calvary Chapel of Temecula Flag Salute Councilmember Parks ROLL CALL: Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Muf~oz PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Award of Valor - Juaneice Riggs Inland Empire Design Institute Achievement Award for Old Town Specific Plan PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes iS provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed on the Agenda or on the consent Calendar, a pink "Request To Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items a "Request To Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. 2teeshaM)el 210 1 0N20/13 PRESENTATIONS\ PROCLAMATIONS City of Temecula AWARD OF VALOR The City Council of the City of Temecula takes great pride in recognizing the heroic action Of Juaneice Riggs who displayed exceptional bravery and presence of mind during a recent runaway truck incident. Juancite reacted quickly to take control of the truck in which she and friends were riding when the driver suffered a seizure, which caused rapid and uncontrolled acceleration of the vehicle. Without her prompt and courageous action, the three young people could have suffered serious injury or loss of life. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto affixed our hands and official seal this 251h day of May, 1993 Mayor J. Sat Mu~oz Mayor Pro Tem Ron Roberrs Councilmember Patricia H. Birdsall Councilmember Ronald J. Parks Councilmember Jeff Stone ITEM 1 ITEM NO. 2 MINUTES OF A SPECIAL JOINT MEETING WITH THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE CITY OF MURRIETA TUESDAY APRIL 27, 1993 A special joint meeting with the Temecula City Council and the Murrieta City Council was called to order Tuesday, April 27, 1993, 6:10 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California, Mayor J. Sal Mufioz presiding. PRESENT: 5 TEMECULA COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Mu~oz Roberrs, ABSENT: 0 TEMECULA COUNCILMEMBERS: None PRESENT: 5 MURRIETA COUNCILMEMBERS: Allen, Smith, Walsh, VanHaaster, Peery ABSENT: 0 MURRIETA COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were Temecula City Manager David F. Dixon, Murrieta City Manager Jack Smith, Temecula City Attorney Scott Field, Murrieta City Attorney Naomi Silverglide, Temecula City Clerk June S. Greek, Murrieta City Clerk Kay Vinson and Recording Secretary Gall Ziglet. INVOCATION Mayor J. Sal Mu~oz gave the invocation. PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Mrs. Ralph Love presented the City of Temecula with an unfinished painting by her husband, the late Ralph Love, to the City of Temecula. Mayor J. Sal Mu~oz presented the Ralph Love family with a proclamation, proclaiming April 18, 1993 as Ralph Love Day. PUBLIC COMMENT None NEW BUSINESS 1. Presentations bv U.R.G.E. and the Riverside Channelization OOtiOn for the Murrieta Creek JTCC/MCC04/27/93 -1 - County Flood Control District 5/10193 JOINT CITY OF TEMECULA/CITY OF MURRIETA MEETING APRIL 27° 1993 Ken Edwards, representing the County Flood Control District, provided an overview of the County Flood Control Plan process and outlined the plan goals. Mr. Edwards stated that the recommended project for the Murrieta Creek is a Mitigated Trapezoidal Channel. Frank Pierce, Chief Engineer with the County Flood Control District, provided exhibits on watershed and rainfall durations, peak flow estimates, and discussed concerns with the URGE alternatives for the creek channel. Murrieta Councilmember Walsh questioned the time involved in obtaining the 404 permit from the Army Corp of Engineers and completing the improvements to the Murrieta Creek channel. Frank Pierce advised that if the process went well, the permit could be issued within a year, however, it would be several years before the channel would be completed. Mr. Pierce advised that only one-fifth of the financing is available at this time. Ken Edwards stated that if the financing was in place, the channel could be built in 3 - 4 years and the project would be built in several phases. Mr. Edwards added that in order to minimize future flood damage during the process, County .Flood Control would need to maintain the natural stream. Murrieta Councilmember Allen questioned if the County Flood Control Plan could be altered. Ken Edwards advised that changes usually get made through the permit process, not by the applicant. If the applicant decides to make changes in the application, the application would need to start the process over again, however if the Army Corp of Engineers wants to make changes, then the applicant makes these changes and the process continues. Mayor Mu~oz declared a recess at 8:00 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 8:25 P.M. Joseph Phelps, Zone 7 Flood Control Commissioner, advised the Council that the Flood Control Commissioners review the budget annually and have been recommending work begin on the Murrieta Creek channel without delay. Mr. Phelps asked that the two Councils approve a plan to build the Murrieta Creek channel and that the plan best serve the interest of the citizens of the City of Temecula and the City of Murrieta. Willie Gale, Chairwoman of U.R.G.E., stated that the U.R.G.E. organizers are concerned with Riverside County Flood Control District's proposed design for channelization of the Murrieta Creek. Ms. Gale stated that the U.R.G.E. vision is that the community have something more than cement blocks as flood control, and the proposed channel design by Riverside County Flood Control will diminish the quality of life that makes southwest Riverside County unique. JTCCIMCC04127193 -2- 5/1 O/93 JOINT CITY OF TEMECULA/CITY OF MURRIETA MEETING APRIL 27. 1993 U.R.G.E. representatives Willie Gale and Chris LeBrand presented the Mayors of both Councils with a commemorative plaque acknowledging "Make A Difference Day", Saturday, November 14, 1992, where 50 business and 500 residents of both cities spent the day cleaning the Murrieta Creek. Ruth Planey, representing U.R.G.E., provided a slide presentation on flood control alternatives and distributed books .by the National Park Service. Ray Johnson, representing U.R.G.E., presented arguments in opposition to the Riverside County Flood Control District channelization plan; outlined U.R.G.E.'s proposed Flood Control Channelization Plan and alternatives; and provided information on the Southwestern Pond Turtle which may be listed as an endangered species and will require additional mitigation. Mr. Johnson stated that U.R.G.E. is not requesting that the permit process be stopped, however, U.R.G.E. would like the two Councils to direct the County Flood Control Agency to address all the issues raised by U.R.G.E. Councilmember Walsh asked that the Councils consider proceeding with the County Flood Control plan and the 404 permit incorporating in that plan accommodations of U.R.G.E.'s plan for the environmentally sensitive areas. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to extend the meeting at 10:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried by the Temecula City Council. It was moved by Mayor Perry, seconded by Councilmember Allen to extend the meeting at 10:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried by the Murrieta City Council. Mayor Mu~oz opened the public hearing at 10:00 P.M. John Bell, representing the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce and Hudson RCI, requested that the two Councils act immediately and approve the Riverside County Flood Control District's plan. David Crowder, 27720 Jefferson Avenue, Temecula, representing Rancon Financial, endorsed Council's approval of the Riverside County Flood Control plan and the 404 application. Frank Spencer, President of the Old Town Merchants Association, advised that he was instructed of the O.T.M.A. to send a recommendation of support for the Riverside County Flood Control plan and support the issuance of the 404 permit. Bill Harker, 31130-85 South General Kearney Road, Temecula, General Manager of the Temecula Town Association and on behalf of that organization, expressed support of the Riverside County Flood Control Plan. ."""' JTCCIMCC04127193 -3- 5/10/93 JOINT CITY OF TEMECULAICITY OF MURRIETA MEETING APRIL27,1993 Bob Pipher, 41825 Green Tree Road, Temecula, a building owner in Old Town Temecula, asked that the Council support the Riverside County Flood Control Plan and asked that the Council address drudging the creek annually until the channel is complete to prevent future damage to Old Town from flooding. Russell Rumansoff, 27349 Jefferson Avenue, Temecula, representing the Temecula- Murrieta Economic DevelOpment Corporation as Chairman of the Expediting Committee, advised the Councils that there are business along the creek which cannot make any plans based on the current situation and encouraged the Councils support of the Riverside County Flood Control Plan. David Barlett, 27711 Diaz Road, Temecula, representing Hudson RCI, expressed a concern for the potential for a flood disaster if a channel is not built and asked for the Councils support of the Riverside County Flood Control Plan. Bonnie Reed, 42050 Main Street, Temecula, expressed her support of the Riverside County Flood Control Plan. Trudy Thomas, 41386 Magnolia Street, Murrieta, representing Assemblyman Ray Haynes - 66th District, read a letter by Assemblyman Haynes supporting the Riverside County Flood Control Plan. Ms. Thomas advised that Assemblyman Haynes is working on getting state 'funding for the construction of the channel. Francis Ehmann, 4562 Elmdale, Scottsdale, Arizona, expressed support of U.R.G.E.'s channel design. Rici Peterson, expressed support of U.R.G.E.'s channel design. Stephen Boyer, 25205 Via Las Lomas, Murrieta, representing Citizens For Historic Murrieta, expressed support of the U.R.G.E. plan. Bill Coscarelli, 39165 Silktree Drive, Murrieta, representing Murrieta Greenways Committee, expressed support for the U.R.G.E. plan. Henry Johnson, 25845 Hayes Avenue, Murrieta, suggested the Councils consider a plan which would incorporate flood control, recreation and a north/south parkway. Robert Wheeler, 24280 Washington Avenue, Murrieta, President of the Elsinore- Murrieta-Anza Resource Conservation District, read from a press release issued on April 22, 1993 announcing the launching of a joint effort by the committee to contain the major problem affecting the Santa Margarita River System working in conjunction with the municipalities, two counties, Camp Pendleton, to minimize storm water runoff from development sites and the severe erosion that goes with it. Completion is set for a target date of September 30, 1993, with two additional months for growth of re- vegetation and ground cover. JTCCIMCC04/2 7 /93 -4,. 5/10~93 JOINT CITY OF TEMECULAICITY OF MURRIETA MEETING APRIL 27, 1993 Vic deforest, 29675 Cantrell Road, Temecula, expressed opposition to the Riverside County Flood Control District creek design. Mike Matteson, 41820 Blett Lane, Murrieta, Second ViCe President of Murrieta County Water District Board of Directors, offered detention/retention programs as a solution to the problem. Mr. Matteson stated that he was in support of the County Task Force Flood Control Plan. Dr. Robert LaRosa, 5173-10 Brighton Avenue, Murrieta, a real estate developer and Director of The Nature School, stated that he is currently campaigning to have the Southern Run Steel Head Trout declared an endangered species, and which has been using local waterways for several years and expressed opposition to the Riverside County Flood Control District plan. Pat Keller, 39201 Santas Drive, Murrieta, representing U.R.G.E., asked that the Councils approve both organizations working together towards a plan for the creek channel. John Cruzen, 34415 Pauba Road, Temecula, expressed opposition to the plan by Riverside County Flood Control. Herb Smith, 42545 Kalmia, Murrieta, expressed support of both organizations working together to get a plan approved and constructed which addresses both the community needs and legal obligations. Supervisor Buster asked the representatives of the County Flood Control District if, after hearing the concerns regarding water resource and environmental resource, would it be better for both communities to refine the plan at this level rather than proceed with a project that minimizes environmental concerns. Ken Edwards advised that Riverside County Flood Control must address all federal agencies when applying for the permit and presenting a plan. Mayor Mu~oz declared a break at 11:05 P.M. to change the tape. The meeting was reconvened at 11:07 P.M. It was moved by Councilmember VanHaaster, seconded by Councilmember Walsh to extend the meeting at 11:00 P.M. to 11:30 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried by the Murrieta City Council. It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to extend the meeting at 11:00 P.M. to 11:30 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried by the Temecula City Council. /"' JTCCIMCC04127193 -5- 5/10/93 JOINT CITY OF TEMECULA/CITY OF MURRIETA MEETING APRIL 27, 1993 Councilmember Parks stated that he feels both the Councils need to send a message of concern to the business owners in their communities by supporting the Riverside County Flood Control Plan. It was moved by Murrieta Councilmember Walsh, seconded by Murrieta Councilmember VanHaaster and moved by Temecula Councilmember Parks, seconded by Temecula Councilmember Birdsall to adopt a resolution in support of the Riverside County Flood Control District Flood Control Plan with the caveat that the City desires that the parties work to reach consensus on the recreational and environmental issues raised during the public input hearings. RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93-32 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE MITIGATED PLAN FOR MURRIETA CREEK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 MURRIETA COUNCILMEMBERS: Allen, Smith, Walsh, VanHaaster, Peery NOES: 0 MURRIETA COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 MURRIETA COUNCILMEMBERS: None AYES: 5 TEMECULA COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Mu~oz NOES: 0 TEMECULA COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 TEMECULA COUNCILMEMBERS: None Roberts, ADJOURNMENT Mayor Mu~oz declared the meeting adjourned at I 1:30 P.M. The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula City Council will be held on Monday, May 11, 1993, at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. JTCCIMCC0412 719 3 -6- 5110~93 JOINT CITY OF TEMECULA/CITY OF MURRIETA MEETING APRIL 27, 1993 The next regular meeting of the City of Murrieta City Council will be held on Monday, May 4, 1993, in City Council Chambers, Murrieta City Hall, 26442 Beckman Court, Murrieta, California. Mayor J. Sal Mu~oz June S. Greek, City Clerk JTCCIMCC04127193 -7- 5/10193 ITEM NO. 3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF. TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 'TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, · DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $557,718.94 Section 2. The City Clerk shah certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVF. D AND ADOPTED, this 251h day of May, 1993. ATTEST: J. Sat Mu~oz, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] .,,_. Reaos 3 12 I STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMEEULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 93- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 25th day of May, 1993 by the following roll call vote: COUNCIL1WF~MBERS: NOE: CO~CIL~-~ERS: CO~C~I~,~XBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk Rcsos 312 2 '~', CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS "~"~- ' 05/06/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 05/13/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 05/25/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 05/06/93 TOTAL PAYROLL: $173,459.73 $102,417.30 $180,586.72 $101,255.19' TOTAL UST OF DEMANDS FOR 05/25/93 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 1 O0 190 191 192 193 210 250 280 300 320 330 PAYROLL: 001 1 O0 190 191 192 193 300 320 330 GENERAL GAS TAX FUND TCSD TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP INSURANCE FUND VEHICLE FUND INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS COPY CENTER FUND· GENERAL (PAYROLL) GAS TAX FUND (PAYROLL). TCSD (PAYROLL} TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A (PAYROLL) TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B (PAYROLL) TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C (PAYROLL) INSURANCE FUND (PAYROLL} INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PAYROLL) COPY CENTER FUND (PAYROLL) TOTAL BY FUND: $205,514.66 $13,383.49 $54,125.55 $2,498.96 $477.54 $2,503.55 $117,896.44 $37,430.11 $2,952.19 $2,337.75 $353.90 $7,745.07 S9,244.54 $87,266.44 $11,646.72 $16,328.78 $386.72 $736.86 $1,452.15 $610.07 $1,264.66 $1,542.79 $557,718.94 $456,463.75 $101,255.19 $557,718.94 PREP D BY KA MCI RE I M Y jANj-~N~/~i~~OFFC~ER'~'/f~ ,HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. ~ , ~'DAVE DIXOI~ CITY MANAGER* / 'j ~' """ , I"~EREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. VOUCHRE2 05/06/93 09:20 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 1~0 CONNUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD 280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - 300 ZNSURANCE FUND 310 VEHICLES FUND ~20 INFORNATION SYSTEMS 330 COPY CENTER FUND TOTAL CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS A!eOUNT 117,685.96 9,198.70 18,238.35 363.20 464.22 1,2.34.63 13,972.00 2,952.19 1,658,80 32~,.76 2,987.59 4,37~.33 173,659.73 PAGE 9 VOUCHRE2 05/06/93 09:20 VbocHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR NUNBER 1~495 04/30/93 000925 GSSP VENDOR NAME 202210 05/06/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 202210 05/06/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 202210 05/06/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 202210 05/06/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 202210. 05/06/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 202210 05/06/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 202210 05/06/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 202210:05/06/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 202210 05/06/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 202210 05/06/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 202210 05/06/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 202210 05/06/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 202210 05/06/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 202210 05/06/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 202210 05/06/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 202210 05/06/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 202210 05/06/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 291247 05/06/92 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 291247 05/06/92 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 05/06/92 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) ~..47 05/06/92 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 291247 05/06/92 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 291247 05/06/92 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 291247 05/06/92 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 291247 05/06/92 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 291247 05/06/92 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 291247 05/06/92 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 291247 05/06/92 000283 FIRSTAX 291247 05/06/92 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 291247 05/06/92 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 291247 05/06/92 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 291247 05/06/92 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 291247 05/06/92 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 10337 05/06/93 VIKING AIR CiTY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CNECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION DOMN PAYNENT ON FLOAT 00044~ CAIT 000444 CAIT 000444 CAIT 000~ CAIT 000444 CAIT 000444 CAIT 00044~ CAIT 000/+44 CAZT 000444 SO l 000444 SO I O00~f~ SO I 000~ SOI 00~/: SOl 000~ sO I 000~ 000~ SOI 000~ SOl 000283 FICA/MED 000283 FICA/NED 000283 FICA/NED 000283 FICA/NED 000283 FICA/MED 000283 FICA/MED 00028] FICA/MED 000283 FICA/MED 000283 FICA/MED 000283 USIT 00028~ USIT 000283 USIT 000283 USIT 000283 USIT 000283 USIT 000283 USIT 000283 USIT VIKING AIR REFUND 10338 05/06/93 HALL,DONIA HALL, DONIA 10339 05/06/93 KAHLOR,LAURA KAHLOR, LAURA/REFUND 10340 05/06/93 KEYES, SYLVIA KEYES,SYLVIA REFUND 10341 05/06/93 KILLEEN, EILEEN KILLEEN, E REFUND 10342 05/06/93 MICHALEK, CHARLENE MICHALEK,C REFUND 10343 05/06/93 MARTIN, MARIE \ HARTIN, M REFUND ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-183-964-5300 001-2070 100-2070 190-2070 191-2070 19]-2070 ]00-2070 320-2070 330-2070 001-2070 100-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 001-2070 100-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 001-2070 100-2070 190-2070 191-2070 193-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 001-199-4060 190-18~-4973 190-183-4807 190-1&3-4833 190-18~-48~0 190-183-4831 190-183-4833 ITEM AHOUNT 750.00 2,714.40 453.35 437.41 15.37 31.92 21.24 45.95 15.59 1,023.25 195.55 251.20 6.22 9.85 22.30 9.67 17.76 22.12 2,414.72 436.21 560.32 13.88 21.98 49.74 21.59 39.62 49.]4 10,631.~4 2,102.03 2,050.34 63.28 184.03 91.14 219.20 96.44 3.47 36.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 750.00 5,293.15 19,045.20 3.47 36. O0 35. O0 35.00 35.00 35.00 35. O0 VOUCHRE2 · 05/06/93 VOUCHER/ CHECK NU!IER 103~ 10345 10345 10346 10366 10367 10348 10349 10369 10369 10349 10369 10369; 10369 10349 10350 10350 10351 10351 10352 10352 10353 10353 10353 10353 10353 10354 10354 10354 10355 10355 10356 10357 10357 10358 10358 10358 09:20 CHECK DATE 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 VENDOR NLNBER 000105 000112 000116 000116 000116 000116 000116 000116 000116 000116 000128 000128 000135 000135 000138 000138 000140 000160 000140 000160 000140 000156 000156 000156 000162 000162 000173 000177 000177 00018~ 00018~ 000184 VENDOR NAME PHELAN, BEVERLY OOER,ROBERT & HELEN ODER,RORERT & HELEN LAZZER, DAVID & DONNA LAZIER, DAVID & DONNA AEI SECURITY, INC. AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC AVP VISION PLAN AVP VISION PLAN AVP VISION PLAN AVP VISION PLAN AVP VISION PLAN AVP VISION PLAN AVP VISION PLAN AVP VISION PLAN CAL'SURANCE ASSOCIATES, CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CITICORP NORTH AMERICA CITICORP NORTH AMERICA COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCZDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTMA EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTWA GENERAL BINDING GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GTE GTE GTE CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHEClCREGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION PNELAN,B REFUND ODER, ROBERT & HELEN R ODER, ROBERT & HELEN R LAZIER DAVID,DONNA REF LAZIER DAVID,DONNA REF ALARIq MONITORING;TEEN C DURS/DEBBIE U. INSURANCE PREMIUM NAY INSURANCE PREMIUM NAY INSURANCE PREMIUM NAY INSURANCE PREMIUM NAY INSURANCE PREMIUM NAY ]NStlRANCE PREMIUM NAY INSURANCE PREMIUM NAY INSURANCE PREMIUM NAY EQUIPMENT FLOATER BOND MISC. SIGNS MlSC. SIGNS PHONE SYSTEM PHONE SYSTEM INSURANCE NAY 1993 INSURANCE NAY 1993 INSURANCE NAY 1993 INSURANCE NAY 1993 INSURANCE NAY 1993 INSURANCE NAY 1993 INSURANCE NAY 1993 INSURANCE NAY 1993 'FAX HE' PERIPHERAL FAC TAX EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE A OFFICE SUPPLIES OPEN PURCHASE ORDER FOR 909-693-3539 909-699-0128 909-699-2309 ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-183-6831 190 - 180 -/,005 191-180-4005 190 - 180 - 6005 191-180-4005 190-182-999-5250 001 - 161-999-5226 001-2310 100-2210 190-2210 191-2310 193-2210 300-2210 00~1 - 1180 330-2210 300-199-999-5201 300-199- 999 - 5200 100-164-999-5264 100-164-999-52~4 320-2800 320-199-999-5560 001-2230 100-2230 190-2330 191-2230 193-2230 001-Z,~0 100-2.~0 001-150-999-5250 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 330-199-999-5589 001-161-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 ITEM' AMOUNT 35.00 105.45 7.56 221.39 15.72 35.00 162.00 422.71 97.15 97.15 7.09 8.66 3.9~ 24.95 15.75 597.00 150.00 191.88 96.33 1,050.41 377.16 121.00 19.50 138.25 11.68 16.02 61.85 13.95 15.00 177.00 13.72 250.00 100.92 10.52 22.75 361.22 25.66 PAGE 3 CHECK AIe3UNT 35.00 113.01 237.11 35.00 142.00 677.60 767.r~: 288.21 1,427.57 306.25 70.80 190.72 250.00 111.~ 389.63""'~ VOUCHRE2 05/06/93 ~>,~;HER/ CHECK NUMBER 10359 10359 10359 .10360 10361 10362 10363 10363 09:20 CHECK DATE 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05]06/93 05/06!93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 VENDOR NUMBER 000186 000186 000186 000201 000209 000238 000243 000243 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AHOUNT HANKS HARDHARE HANKS NARDMARE HANKS HARDHARE ~N P.O. FOR NISC. NAI NISC. NAINT SUPPLIES NISC. SUPPLIES JENNACO TEEN CENTER CLEANING L & M FERTILIZER MISC. PARTS FINAL TOUCH MARKETING CONTRACT CONTINGENCY; T PAYLESS DRUG STORE PAYLESS DRUG STORE FILM PROCESSING SERVICE FILM PROCESSING 10364 05/06/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM INSURANCE MAY 93 10364 05/06/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM INSURANCE MAY 93 10364 05/06/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM /NSURANCE MAY 93 10364 05/06/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN INSURANCE MAY 93 10364 05/06/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN INSURANCE MAY 93 10364 05/06/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM INSURANCE MAY 93 10364 05/06/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM INSURANCE MAY 93 10364 05/06/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH ZNSUR.PREM INSURANCE MAY 93 10364 05/06/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN INSURANCE MAY 93 ""'~ 05/06/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PER REOE ~5 05/06/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PER REDE 10365 05/06/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS MET 10365 05/06/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 10365 05/06/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 10365 05/06/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 10365 05/06/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES, RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 10365 05/06/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 PERS MET 10365 05/06/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 10365 05/06/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 10365 05/06/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 pERS RET 10365 05/06/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES, RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 10365 05/06/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 10365 05/06/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 10365 05/06/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 10365 05/06/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 10365 05/06/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 10365 05/06/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 10365 05/06/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 10365 05/06/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 000248 000248 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 10366 10366 10367 10367 10367 10367 000249 000249 000249 000249 100-164-999-5218 100-164-999-5218 190-180-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-180-999-5242 280-199-999-5264 190-180-999-5250 001-162-999-5222 001-2090 100-2090 190-2090 191-2090 192-2090 193-2090 300 - 2090 330-2090 001-150-999-5250 001-2130 100-2130 001-2390 100-2390 190-2390 191-2390 192-2390 193-2390 300-2390 320-2390 330-2390 001-2390 100-2390 190-2390 191-2390 192-2390 300:2390 320-2390 330-2390 PETROLANE PROPANE 190-180-999-5263 PETROLANE OPEN PURCHASE ORDER FOR 190-180-999-5263 PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 001-171-999-5242 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5208 001-140-999-5260 42.40 ~.~ 400.00 11.35 357.19 5.38 6.63 14,344.90 2,790.63 3,373.48 135.11 300.24 457.~ 142.48 583.05 107.86 42.94 171.76 11,212.89 1,770.12 2,154.59 69.12 96.85 245.46 98.65 201.73 218.07 56.60 8.60 12.09 .42 .93 1.44 .46 .93 44.21 80.05 35.23 40.42 5.36 6.90 PAGE ' 4 CHECK AMOUNT 150.60 400.00 11.35 357.19 12.01 22,235.19 16,365.51 124.26 VOUCHRE2 05106193 09:20 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 103~7 05106193 10367 05106193 10367 05106193 10367 05106193 10367 05/06/93 10367 05/06/93 10367.05/0~/93 10367 05/06/93 10367 05/06/93 10:367 05/06/93 10367 05/06/93 10367 05/06/93 N~BER NH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY CASH 000249 PETTY rASH 10368 05/06/93 000251 10368 05/06/93 000251 10368 05/06/93 000251 10368 05/06/93 000251 10369 05/06/93 10370 05/06/93 10371 05/06/93 10372 05/06/93 10372 05/06/93 10372 05/06/93 10372 05/06/93 10373 05/06/93 PLANNING CENTER, THE PLANNING CENTER, THE PLANNING CENTER, THE PLANNING CENTER, THE 000262 RANCHO WATER 000268 RIV. co. HABITAT CONSER 000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY 000285 SIR SPEEDY 000285 SIR SPEEDY 000285 SIR SPEEDY 000285 SIR SPEEOY 000305 TARGET STORE 10374 05/06/93 000308 10374 05/06/93 000308 10374 05/06/93 000308 10375 05/06/93 10376 05/06/93 10377 05/06/93 TENECULA TOMNE ASSOCIAT TEMECULA TO~E ASSOCIAT TENECULA TOWNE ASSOCIAT 000311 TEMECULA VALLEY HIGH SC 000321 UBNOSKE, DEBBIE 000322 UNIGL08E BUTTERFIELD TR 10378 05/06/93 000325 10378 05/06/93 000325 10378 05/06/93 000325 10378 05/06/93 000325 10379 05/06/93 10379 05/06/93 10380 05/06/93 UNITED MAY OF THE INLAN UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN UNITED WAY OF THE ]NLAN 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION PETTY CASH REINB. PETTY CASH REINB. PETTY CASH REIMB, PETTY CASH REIMB, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY rASH PETTY CASH GENERAL PLAN eENERAL PLAN GENERAL PLAN GENERAL PLAN 2 MATER METERS PAYMENT FOR APRIL CABINETS 2-BOXES OF 4-PART CONTI 2-BOXES OF 4-PART CONTI TAX TAX EASTER BASKETS FOR EAST LOCKER RENTAL AT TOWN SET UP AND CLEANING FOR FLOOR CARE FOR CITY COU CS FUNDING TUITION REIMB. AIRLINE TICKETS/SAL NUN 000325 000325 U~ 000325 000325 tN 2-SETS OF UNIFORMS; CLE UNIFORM NAINT. 5100 XEROX LEASE AGREEN ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-150-999-5260 001-161-999-5220 001-100-999-5260 001-161-999-5260 190-183-932-5300 190-180-999-5212 190-18,:1-819-5300 190-182-999-5300 190-180-999-5220 190-182-999-5300 190-183-966-5300 190-18,t-810-5300 001-161-999-5248 001-161-999-5248 001-161-999-5248 001-161-999-5248 250-190-129-5804 001-2300 190-180-999-5242 001-140-999-5222 001-163-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 001-163-999-5222 190-183-9~2-5300 190-180-999-5238 001-100-999-5234 001-100-999-5234 001-100-999-5267 001-150-999-5259 001-100-999-5258 001-2120 100-2120 190-2120 300-2120 100-164-999-5243 190-180-999-5243 330-199-999-5582 ITEN AMOUNT 5.65 11.69 101.51 ~..00 13.25 14.49 115.79 14.70 10.78 10.90 28.8~ 27,365.25 1,326.36 575.74 3,029.91 13,972.00 17,062.50 283.08 257.38 257.37 19.95 19.95 218.54 15.00 90.00 45.00 5,000.00 387.58 141.00 77.25 9.25 17.50 .50 12.50 13.60 2,958.11 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 526.15 32,297.26 13,972.00 17,062.50 285 "" 554.65 218.54 150.00 5,000.00 387.58 141.00 104.50 26.10 2,938.11 --'~,. VOUCHRE2 05/0&/93 ,,-, '~goCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 10381 10382 10383 10383 10383 10384 1038~ 10385 10386 10387 10387 10387 10387 10388 10388 10388 10388 10388 10388 10388 10389 10390 10390 10390 10391 10392 10393 10394 10395 10395 10396 10397 09:20 CHECK DATE 05/0~/~ 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 OS/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 VENDOR NUMBER 0003~9 0003?8 000389 000389 000389 000399 0003~9 · 000~03 000423 000430 000430 000430 000430 000431 000431 000431 000431 000431 000431 000431 000431 000431 00043q 000453 00O472 000472 000472 000512 000548 000557 000558 000587 000587 000594 000599 VENDOR NAME ZlliERLE, STEVE HAFELI, THOMAS USCM USCN USCN MUNICIPAL MANAGEMENT AS NUNICIPAL MANAGEMENT AS SHAWN SCOTT POOL & SPA H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH# NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL DENTAL HEAL. THe, NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, THE ECONOMICS PRESS, IN PARAD I SE CHEVROLET PARADISE CHEVROLET PARADISE CHEVROLET CADET UNIFORM KIPLINGER WASHINGTON ED JOHNSON REPEATER ADVANCED NONI LCOIe4 NUNOZ, NARIO NUNOZ, NAR]O KRTN FM RADIO UC REGENTS CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION REINB EXPENSE.SZERRA CO REIMB/CONFERENCE 000389 PT RETIR 000~89 PT RET]R 000389 PT RETIR MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL GY MEMBERSHIP DUES POOL SERVICE APRIL OPEN P.O. RECREATION SU INSURANCE PREMIUM NAY 9 INSIJRANCE PREMIUM NAY 9 INSURANCE PREMIUM NAY 9 INSURANCE PREMIUM NAY 9 INSURANCE PREMIUM NAY INSURANCE PREMIUM NAY INSURANCE PREMIUM NAY INSURANCE PREMIUM NAY INSURANCE PREMIUM NAY INSURANCE PREMIUM NAY INSURANCE PREMIUM NAY INSURANCE PREMIUM NAY INSURANCE PREMIUM NAY INSURANCE PREMIUM NAY RENEW SUBSCRIPTION PARTS TO INSTALL MIRROR LABOR TO INSTALL MIRROR TAX ENTRY RUG SERVICE; CITY 92590NLSS1 SUBSCRIPTION MONTHLY PALONAR BASE, M MONTHLY ELSINURE BASE U CARPET CLEANING SERVICE SCRUB/WAX FLOORS CITY H CS FUNDING SAFETY COURSE ACCOUNT NUIIER 001-1~-;~-5258 320-1~-~-5258 001-2160. 100-2160 190-2160 001-140-~-5226 001-150-~-5226 1~0-180-~-5212 190-180-999-5300 001-2510 100-2510 190-2510 300-2510 001 -Z.T,40 100-2340 190-2340 191-2340 192 - 2340 19'5-2340 300-2340 330-2340 001-1180 001-150-~-5250 001-162-999-5228 310-180-999-5214 310-180-999-5214 310-180-999-5214 001-199-999-5250 190-180-999-5228 320-199-999-5209 320-199-999-5209 001-199-999-5212 001-199-999-5212 001-100-999-5267 001-163-999-5258 ITEM AMOUNT 195.41 236.12 137.64 141.00 282.32 40.00 40.00 300.00 51.27 225.42 36.48 1.80 590.62 94.50 110.25 7.09 15.75 8.66 7.88 ' 31.50 47.25 15.00 31.80 102.21 156.00 7.92 34.25 48.00 186.00 195.30 300.00 400.00 2,000.00 240.00 PAGE CHECK AMOUNT 195.41 560. ~6 80.00 300.00 51.27 928.50 31.80 266.13 34.25 48.00 186.00 195.30 700.00 2,000.00 240.00 VOUC:HRE2 05/06/93 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 10398 1O398 10398 10398 10398 10399 10400 10400 10400 10401 10402 10403 09:20 CHECK DATE 05106193 05106/93 05106193 05106193 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 05/06/93 CITY OF TEHECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUHBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT 000642 000642 000642 000642 000642 000649 CITY OF TEHECULA - FLEX REINB, ACCT, CITY OF TEMEOULA - FLEX REIMB, ACCT, CiTY OF TEMECULA - FLEX REIMB, ACCT. CITY OF TEHECULA - FLEX REIMB. ACCT. CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX REIHB. ACCT. BUNOZ, SAL J. REPLACE CK#1~ LOST 001-1020 190-1020 193-1020 300-1020 330-1020 001-100-999-5258 000~7~ BO-GRAPHICS MAONETIC BUSINESS CARDS 001-170-~-5220 00067~ BO-GRAPHICS SOLE PROPRIETOR 001-170-~x~-5220 00067~ BO-GRAPHICS TAX 001-170-~-5220 000731 NATIONAL SENINARS GROUP SEMINAR PICCA DELl BOX LUNCHES CENTENNIAL CENTER FOR URBAN POLICY PUBLICATIONS 000740 000746 001-161-999-5258 190-180-999-5260 001-161-999-5228 10404 05/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM NAY 93 001-2360 10404 05/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PRENIUM NAY 93 100-2360 10404 05/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM NAY 93 190-2360 10404 05/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM NAY 93 191-2360 10404 05/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM NAY 93 192-2360 10404 05/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM NAY 93 193-2360 10404 05/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM NAY 93 300-2360 10404 05/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM MAY 93 320-2360 10404 05/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM NAY 93 330-2360 10404 05/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM NAY 93 001-2380 10404 05/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM NAY 93 100-2380 10404 05/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM NAY 93 190-2380 10404 05/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM NAY 93 191-2380 10404 05/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM NAY 93 192-2380 10404 05/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM NAY 93 193-2380 10404 05/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM NAY 93 300-2380 10404 05/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM NAY 93 320-2380 10404 05/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM NAY 93 330-2380 10404 05/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM NAY 93 001-2500 10404 05/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM NAY 93 100-2500 10404 05/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM NAY 93 190-2500 10404 05/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM NAY 93 191-2500 10404 05/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PRENIUM NAY 93 192-2500 10404 05/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM NAY 93 193-2500' .10404 05/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM NAY 93 300-2500 10404 05/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM NAY 93 330-2500 10404 05/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM NAY 93 320-2500 05/06/93 10405 000770 000820 UCR EXTENSION k~ORKSHOP WINCHAK, KRIS NAP CHECKING SERVICES F STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 000837 FRAN TAX 000837 10406 10407 05/06/93 05/06/93 190-180-999-5258 001-163-999-5249 100-2140 3,227.54 412.73 172.83 1.10 100.00 48.48 410.00 255.00 48.17 138.00 47.20 27.45 562.86 87.88 123.50 4.28 9.50 14.72 4.76 9.50 19.00 849.69 137.13 160.81 5.36 7.43 19.07 7.58 15.05 15.07 190.95 30.81 36.66 1.22 1.69 1.73 3.43 3.43 55.00 125.00 164.83 PAGE CHECK AMOUNT 3,914.20 48.48 713.17 138.00 47. ZO 27.45 2,327.45 55.00 125.00 164.8""',. VOUCHRE2 05/06/93 09:20 /,,--- V~,~;HER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUNI!ER 10408 05/06/93 000907 10408 05i06/9~. 000907 10408 05/06/93 000907 10408 05/06/93 000907 10409 05/06/93 10410 05/06/93 10411 05/06/93 1041Z 05/06/93 10413 05/06/93 10414 05/06/93 1041~ 05/06/93 000970 10416 05/06/93 00097Z 10417 05/06/93 000973 ~8 OS/06/93 000974 10419 05/06/93 000975 10419 OS/06/93 000975 10420 05/06/93 000976 10421 05/06/93 000977 104Z2 05/06/93 000978 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER[OO$ TENECULA CAR WASH TENECULA CAR WASH TENECULA CAR WASH TENECULA CAR WASH 000956 PRECISION CANERA SERVIC 000958 000966 KLOOS, TODDY 000967 SHUNAN, JACK 000968 CREATIVE PRONOTION 000969 ALTERNATIVES TO DONESTI ITEN ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUNBER OIL CHANGES AND CAR WAS 310-180-999-5214 OIL CHANGES AND CAR WAS 310-164-999-5214 OIL CHANGES AND CAR WAS 310-162-999-5214 OIL CHANGES AND CAR WAS 310-180-999-5214 REPAIR OF DROPPED P.W. ROBERT CARAN PROOUCTION DESIGN AND CONDUCT JULY **CLAINa/OOS2/KLOO$ **CLAINI~OOSS/SHUNAN TEMECULA FZLN COMM]SS]O Cs FUNDING CONFERENCE REGISTRATION TOT LOT EQUIP TUITION RE]NB. 1~3RKSHOP NAY 19 M3RKSHOP MAY 19 CS FUNDING CS FUNDING CS FUNDING CITY OF INDIAN WELLS INLAND ENPIRE BUSINESS NIRACLE RECREATION EQUI RUIZ, CRAIG AALR&R AALR&R INLAND VALLEY REACT TENECULA VALLEY SPECIAL TRAUMA INTERVENT]ON PRO 100-16~-999-5215 190-180-999-5250 300-199-999-5207 300-199-999-5207 280-199-999-5264 001-100-999-5267 001-100-999-5258 001-161-999-5258 190-180-999-5212 001-150-999-5259 001-140-999-5258 001-16.~-999-5258 001-100-999-5267 001-100-999-5267 001-100-999-5267 TOTAL CHECKS ITEN AMOUNT 4.00 18.73 17.95 17.95 65.00 3,500.00 87.28 410.00 2,595.00 1,000.00 15.00 178.00 949.36 294.00 85.00 100.00 2,000.00 1,500.00 3,000.00' PAGE 8 CHECK ANOUNT 58.63 65.00 3,500.00 87.28 410.00 2,595.00 1,000.00 15.00 178.00 949.36 294.00 185.00 2,000.00 1,500.00 3,000,00 173,459.73 VOUCHRE2 05/13/g3 13:42 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 COle4UNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTPROJ FUND 300 INSURANCE FUND 310 VEHICLES FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 COPY CENTER FUND TOTAL CITY OF TEIIECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER]COS ANOUNT 78,056.33 3,18~.79 13,3244.20 2,135.76 13.32 1,268.92 350.00 678.95 3,027.13 102,441T.30 PAGE 7 VOUCHRE2 05/13/93 13:42 /VixaCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 10423 05/13/93 14658 0~/01/93 10427 05/'13/93 10428 05/13/93 10429 05/13/93 10~29 05/13/93 10430 05/13/93 10431 05/13/93 10432 05/13/93 10433 05/13/93 10434 05/13/93 10435 05/13/93 ~6 05/13/93 10437 05/13/93 10438 05/13/93 10439 05/13/93 10440 05/13/93 10441 05/13/93 10442 05/13/93 10443 05/13/93 10444 05/13/93 10445 05/13/93 10446 05/13/93 10446 05/13/93 10447 05/13/93 10448 05/13/93 10448 05/13/93 10448 05/13/93 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 000597 STATE {dATER RESOURCES C 000878 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB SMITH, BARBARA SHEDD, LINDA SCHACHTELL, DXETER SCHACHTELL, DIETER BRYAN, SANDRA CISSELL, RORY FLAIM, JAN CUELLAR, CYNTHIA O'ROURKE, AMABA NCGAUGH, PAULA GOULD, ALYCE WALD, MICHELLE WHITMAN, KIMBERLY COX, PATSY BRCN./NSWORTH, LOR! PRESLEY OF SAN DIEGO DAVIS, YOLANDA ARCHER ROOFING ADKISON, CYND] CARBONE, MARY JANE ABSOLUTE ASPHALT ABSOLUTE ASPHALT AT & T CARL WARREN & CO. CARL WARREN & CO, CARL WARREN & CO, 000104 000104 000114 000131 000131 000131 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REG]STER FOR ALL PERIODS I TEN DESCRIPTION PLAN CHECK FEE 2ND DISBURSENENTS OF FU REFUND OF DISNEYLAND TI SHEDD/CANCELLED TCSO CL SCHACHTELL/ASSNT REFUND SCHACHTELL/ASSNT REFUND BRYAN/CSD CANCELLED PRO CISSELL/CSD CANCELED EV FLAIM/CSD CANCELED EVEN CUELLAR/CSD CANCELED EV O'ROURKE/CSD CANCELED C MCGAUGH/CSD CANCELED CL GOULD/CSD CANCELED EVEN WALD/CSD CANCELED CLASS WHITHAN/CSD CANCELED CL COX/CSD CANCELED EVENT BROIJNSWORTH/CSD CANCELE PRESLEY/OVERPYMT OF FRR REFUND/DAVIS, YOLANDA ARCHER ROOF]NG/OVERPHT/ ADKISON/CSD CANCELED CL REFUND/CARBONE, MARY JA 60 LB, BAGS OF ASPHALT TAX 909-694-1989 4/25 F91031 F91035 F91036 ACCOUNT NUMBER 210-190-120-5802 001-1500 001-2172 190-183-4807 190-180-4005 191 - 180-4005 190-183-4936 190 - 183 - 4936 190-183-4936 190-183-4936 190-183-4972 190-183-4972 190-183-4936 190-183-4972 190-183 - 4972 190-183-4936 190-183-4936 O01 - 2660 190 - 183 - 4948 001-2660 190-183-4948 190-183-4938 100-16~-999-5218 100-16~-999-5218 320-199-999-5208 300-199-999-5205 300-199-999-5205 300-199-999-5205 ITEM AMOUNT 250.00 1,894.6~ 180.00 35.00 265.67 18.86 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 36.00 36.00 40.00 36.00 36.00 40.00 40.00 4.00 3.00 51.00 6.00 17.00 350.00 27.13 8.11 152.38 1~4.50 97.50 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 250.00 1,8W,.64 180.00 35.00 284.53 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 36.00 36.00 40.00 36.00 36.00 40.00 40.00 4.00 3.00 51.00 6.00 17.00 3?7.13 8.11 VOUCHRE2 05/13/93 13:42 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 3 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 10~8 10~8 10/~8 10~9 10449 10450 10~50 10651 10651 10~51 10652 lo~5~ 10653 10454 10455 10655 10455 10456 10457 10458 10458 10459 10459 10459 10459 10459 10459 10459 10459 10460 10461 10462 10462 10462 1046~ 10463 'CHECK DATE 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93. 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 VENDOR NUMBER 000131 .000131 000131 000165 000165 00017? 000177 000186 000186 000186 000186 000206 000206 000214 000218 000218 000218 000219 000230 000243 000243 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 0OO253 000254 000262 000262 000262 000266 000266 VENDOR NAME CARL WARREN &CO. CARL WARREN & CO. CARL WARREN & CO. FEDERAL EXPRESS FEDERAL EXPRESS GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GTE GTE GTE HANKS HARDMARE KINKO'S COPIES KINKO'S COPIES LUNCH & STUFF CATERING NARILYN'S COFFEE SERVIC MARILYN'S COFFEE SERVIC MARILYN'S COFFEE SERVIC MARTIN 1'HOUR PHOTO MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES PAYLESS DRUG STORE PAYLESS DRUG STORE PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH POSTMASTER PRESS ENTERPRISE RANCHO MATER RANCHO MATER RANCHO MATER RIGHTMAY RIGHTMAY ITEM DESCRIPTION F91037 F90039 F910~2 1339-1107-31C1,1 1339-1107-3 CN WALNUT PLAliJE (3) OPEN P.O. BUILDING 909-694-1989 909-699-8632 APR. CREDIT CARD FRAUD HISC. SUPPLIES COPY SUPPLIES OPEN P.O. FOR MISC. SER CATERING COUNCIL COFFEE SERVICE COFFEE SERVICE COFFEE SERVICE FILM DEVELOPING, PURCHA POSTAGE 1ST CLASS/93-94 FILM PROCESSING SERVICE FILM PROCESSING SERVICE PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REINB. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REINB. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REINB. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REIMB. ANNUAL FEES 2 X 6" AD - $4.34 COL I 5/05/93 BILLING 5/05/93 BILLING 5/05/93 BILLING PORTABLE TOILET RENTALS PORTABLE TOILET RENTALS ACCOUNT NUMBER 300-199-999-5205 300-199-999-5205 300 - 199 - 999 - 5205 001-110-999-5230 001-110-999-5230 190-180-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 001-171-999-52~ 330-199-999-5222 330-199-999-5222 001:100-999-5260 001-199-999-5250 001-199-999-5250 001-199-999-5250 001-16~-999-5250 190-180-999-5525 190-180-999-5250 190-180-999-5250 001-100-999-52Z0 001-150-999-5260 001-161-999-5220 001-161-999-5226 001-161-999-5260 001-162-999-5220 001-16~-999-5260 001-199-4060 330-199-999-5581 001-120-999-5256 190-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5260 191-180-999-5240 1~-1~-999-5~8 1~-1~-999-5~8 ITEM ANOUNT 9.50 15.25 48.33 15.04 8,627.70 17.11 6,604.29- 4.27 47.84 80.00 100.45 43.36 45.86 92.89 4,164.98 18.90 6.~ 3.56 ' 39.62 15.49 7.00 40.00 2.69 25.90 .50 150.00 34.56 1,266.62 979.16 91.56 57.39 229.55 CHECK ANOUMT 635.27 24.75 63.37 2,040.52 ~.~ 52.11 80.00 189.k,_. 92.89 4,164.98 23.65 134.76 150.00 34.56 2,317.34 VOUCHRE2 05/13/93 ./,--- ~IX~C:HER/ CHECK NUMBER 10463 104,63 10464 10465 10465 10465 10465 10465 10465 10465 10465 10465 10465 10465 10465 1046~ 10465 10465 10465 ~1J2~66 , ~d6 10466 10467 10467 10467 10467 10467 10467 10468 10469 104 70 10471 10471 10471 104 72 10472 10473 10473 10473 13:42 CHECK DATE 05/13/9nj 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 e5/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 CITY OF TENECtJLA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 000266 000266 000271 000294 000294 000294 000294 000294 000294 000294 000294 000294 000294 000294 000294 000294 000294 000294 000294 000302 000302 000302 000302 000303 000303 000303 000303 000303 000303 000306 000311 000317 000319 000319 000319 000326 000326 RIGHTMAY RIGHTgAY ROBERT BEIN, WN FROST & STATE COffi)ENSATION INS. STATE COHPENSATIOR INS, STATE CONPENSATIOR INS, STATE COIPENSATION INS, STATE COlIPENSAT]ON INS, STATE COIqPENSATIOR INS, STATE COMPENSATIOR INS, STATE COMPENSATION INS, STATE COIPENSATIOR INS, STATE COMPENSATION INS, STATE CONPENSATIOR INS, STATE COMPENSATION INS, STATE COMPENSAT]OR INS, STATE COMPENSATION INS, STATE COMPENSATION INS, STATE COMPENSATION INS, SYSTEM SOURCE SYSTEM SOURCE SYSTEM SOURCE SYSTEM SOURCE SYSTEM 2/90 SYSTEM 2/90 SYSTEM 2/90 SYSTEM 2/90 SYSTEM 2/90 SYSTEM 2/90 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE TEMECULA VALLEY HiGH SC THORRSBORNE, ALICIA TOMARK SPORTS, INC. TOMARK SPORTS, INC. TONARK SPORTS, INC. UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE GREEK, HAROLD F. GREEK, HAROLD F. GREEK, HAROLD F. 000360 000360 000360 PORTABLE TOILET RENTALS 190-180-999-5238 PORTABLE TOILET; I YEAR 100-164-999-5238 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES F 100-164-999-5248 APRIL 93 WOR[ERS' COIF APRIL 93 WORKERS' COIqP APRIL 93 M2RICERS' CONP APRIL 93 M2RKERS~ COHP APRIL 93 WORKERS' COMP APRIL 93 ~ORL'ERS' CONP APRIL 93 WORKERS' CONP APRIL 93 MORKERS~ COMP 001-2370 100-2370 190-2370 191-2370 192-2370 193-2370 300-2370 320-2370 APRIL 93 MORKERS, COMP 330-2370 APRIL 93 II2RKERS' COI4P APRIL 93 MORKERS' CONP APRIL 93M2RKER$' CCNP APRIL 93 IK)RKERS' COMP APRIL 93 MORKERS' COMP APRIL 93 WORKERS' COIqP APRIL 93 MORKERS' CONP 001-100-999-5112 001-110-999-5112 001-140-999-5112 190-180-999-5112 001-161-999-5112 001-1182 001-1182 313005; 30" LOAD BAR 305805; DOUBLE SORTERS FREIGHT TAX 001-140-999-5242 001-140-999-5242 001-140-999-5242 001-140-999-5242 PRESPACED COPY; 1/2" NAMEPLATE: 2X8A; NARIAN FREIGHT FREIGHT TAX TAX 320-19~-999-5221 001-162-99~-5220 320-199-999-5221 001-162-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 320-199-999-5221 MISC. SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5212 CS FUNDING 001-100-999-5267 TUITION REIMB. 001-150-999-5259 10145 FOUR'WAY PITCHER' FREIGHT TAX 190-183-906-5300 190-183-906-5300 190-183-906-5300 2-SETS OF UNIFORMS; CLE 100-164-999-5243 UNIFORM RENTAL 190-180-999-5243 IRRIGATION PLANS CREDIT/EXCEEDS CONTRACT APRIL M3RKERS' CONP 190-180-999-5250 190-180-999-5250 001-1182 ITEM ANOLINT 114.78 57.39 687.81 5,991.03 1,777.18 1,992.51 111.74 13.32 237.61 43.68 126.64 146.65 12.81 .05 3.07 .81 8.93 5.59 89.40 45.00 152.00 12.00 16.20 13.86 21.60 1.50 1.50 1.68 1.07 29.04 3,500.00 400.00 228. O0 6.73 17.67 12.50 13.60 1,475.00 475.00- 89.40- PAGE 4 CHECK MIOUNT 459.11 687.81 10,561.02 225.20 41.21 29.04 3,500.00 400.00 252.40 26.10 910.60 VOUCHRE2 05/13/f3 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 10474 10474 10474 10474 10474 10474 10474 10474 10474 10474 10474 10474 10474 10475 10475 10475 104 75 10475 10475 10475 10475 10475 10475 10475 10475 1O475 1O475 10476 10476 10477 10478 13:42 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUNBER MANE 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/i3/93 05!13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/!3/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13193 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 05/13/93 000376 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 00037~ SOUTHERN CALIF EDISOM 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISQM 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000374. SOUTHERN CAL]F EDISON 000374. SOUTHERN CALZF EDISON 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000374. SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF BISON 000374. SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000374. SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375' SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 000388 ICBO 000388 ICBO 000403 SHAUN SCOTT POOL & SPA 000417 ACTS, INC. CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCR]PT]ON 0:5/30/93-04./29/93 03/30/93-04/29/93 03/30/93-04129/93 ' 03/30/93-04/29/93 04102193-05104193 04101193-05104193 04/01/93-05/03/93 04/01/93-05/03/93 04/01/93-05/03/93 04/01/93-05/03/93 04/01/93-05/03/93 03/08/93-04/Q6/93 03/22/93-04/21/93 03/22/93-04/21/93 03/23/93-04/22/93 03/23/93-04/21 05/23/93-04/21/93 03/23/93 - 04/2 1 03/23/93 - 04/2 1 03/23/93 - 04/2 1 3/23/93 - 4/2 1/93 03/23/93 - 04/2 1/~3 03/23/93 - 04/21/93 03/24/93-04./23/93 03/25/93- 04/26/93 03/25/93 - 909-202-4204/1~E 909-202-4.753/SH 909-202-4.754./KH 909-202-4755/VAN 909-202-4756/TH 909-202-4.757NAy 909-202-4758/RR 909-202-4759 TE 909-202-4.760 NAY ~09-202-4761/SN 909-202-4762/Rp 909-202-4763/PB 909-202-4764/JH 909-202-4.765/BE 909-2024769/JS 9092024.771/DD 03130193-04129193 CALIFORNIA CODE BOOKS UPDATES POOL SERVICE CASSETTE TAPES FOR FIN ACCOUNT NUMBER 191 - 180 -999-5240 193-180-999-524.0 193-180-999-524.0 191-180-999-5500 191 - 180-999-5500 190-180-999-524.0 190-180-999-5240 190-180-999-524.0 191 - 180-999-5500 191 - 180-999-5500 19i-180-999-5500 193-180-999-524.0 191 - 180-999-5500 191 - 180- 999- 5500 191 - 180-999-5500 191-180-999-5500 191 - 180-999-5500 190-182-999- 5240 190-182-999-524.0 190-182-999-524.0 190-180-999-524.0 191 - 180-999-524.0 191-180-999-5500 191-180-999-5500 193-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5500 001-110-999-5208 190-180-999-5208 190-180-999-5208 190-180-999-5208 001-110-999-5208 001-120-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-162-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-.163-999-5208 001-163-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-110-999-5208 191-180-999-5500 001-171-999-5228 001-171-999-5228 190-180-999-5212 001-140-999-5228 ITEM NeOUNT 37.76 12.90 12.90 164.84 210.55 14.19 1,167.54 1,301,04 124,88 135.37 14.0.66 12,59 7.87 141.34. 138.81 124.17 119.12 119.66 128.26 62.27 23.28 38,51 154.21 160.33 13.76 174..93 48.73 45.65 38.67 46.80 37.45 47.08 50.58 35.58 237.92 49.73 58.85 35 .~4 70.50 151.22 40,25 50.70 15,00 90. O0 4.8. O0 PAGE 5 CHECK AmUNT 4,741.74 1,128,52 65.70 90.00 48.0r"', VOUCHRE2 05/13/93 13:42 V(XK;HER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER MANE 1047~ 05/13/93 000~6 VISION COI~NICATION SE 1047~ o5/13/93 000446 VISION COIIUN1CATION SE 10480 05/13/93 000471 IGOE & COMPANY 10481 05/13/93 000481 10482 05/13/93 000489 10483 0~/13/93 000521 10484 05/13/93 000563 10485 05/13/93 000574 10485 05/13/93 000574 10486 05/13/93 000643 10487 05/13/93 000653 LUCKY STORE 10488 05/13/93 000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL 10488 05/13/93 000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL /1~ 05/13/93 000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL ~ 05/13/9] 000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL 10489 05/13/93 000835 REZEK EQUIPMENT 10489 05/13/93 000835 REZEK EQUIPMENT 10489 05/13/93 000835 REZEK EQUIPMENT 10489 05/13/93 000835 REZEK EQUIPRENT 10490 05/13/93 000878 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB 10491 05/13/93 000890 LEENING, LOIS 10492 05/13/93 000907 TEHECULA CAR MASH 10492 05/13/93 000907 TENECULA CAR MASH 10493 05/13/93 000916 BANK OF AMERICA - CC 10494 05/13/93 000945 LPS COMPUTER SERVICE GR 10495 05/13/93 000984 CALIFORNIA N/tIN STREET 10496 05/13/93 000985 H.E.O.F. 10497 05/13/93 000986 SAGAMORE PUBLISHING INC 10498 05/13/93 000987 RIVERSIDE AREA RAPE CRI 10499 05/13/93 000988 .SOLANO PRESS BOOKS '/~. 05/13/93 000989 BOSTRE, ANNA MARIA CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER!OOS ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUIIER RA 3183 - REPAIR OF ETE 320-1~-9~-5215 FREIGHT 320-199-9~9-5215 FLEX PLAN APRIL 93 001-150-~-5250 GEOTECHN]CAL & ENVIRORM CONSTRUCTION SERVICES T 210-1~-801-5804 COBB GROUP PARN)OX USER JOURNAL 320-1~-9~-5228 STEMART, BRUCE M, STREET ADDRESSING 001'162-999-5250 T.E.A.M. INC. CS FUNDING 001-100-9~-5267 SUPER TONER HP III LASERJET TONER C. 320-1~-~-5221 SUPER TONER TAX FORTHER HARDUARE MISC. SUPPLIES SUPPLIES/COOKIE ffi3NSTER FUEL/CN FUEL/TCSD FUEL/PM FUEL/B&S HARK 5005 LIGHT M/MODUL TRIPO0 STAND LEGS 48" U INNER SLIP-FZTTER M/1/2 TAX PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS MILEAGE REIMB. OIL CHANGES AND CAR MAS OIL CHANGES AND CAR MAS 4798020000010815/PB LABOR CHARGE FOR LJII] SERVICE FEE OLD TOWN SP SEMINAR REGISTRATION FE PUBLZCATZORS CS FUNDING PUBLICATIONS REIMB SEMINAR 320-199-999-5221 190-180-999-5212 190-183-968-5300 001-110-999-5263 190-180-999-5263 100-164-~99-5263 001-162-999-5263 001-171-999-5242 001-171-~99-5242 001-171-999-5242 001-171-~99-5242 001-1500 001-120-999-5262 310-164-999-5214 310-180-9~-5214 001-100-9~-5258 320-199-999-5215 001-161-999-5230 190-180-~99-5258 190-180-999-5228 001-100-999-5267 001-161-~99-5228 001-163-~99-5258 ITEM AMOUNT 75.00 9.00 230.50 100.00 69. O0 270. O0 10,000.00 540.00 41.85 177.18 20. O0 41 71.31 272.78 41.71 312.00 89. O0 50,706.18 29.82 25.14 4.00 164.36 65.00 16.50 50. O0 44.02 2,000.00 40.21 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 84.00 230.50 100.00 69. O0 270. O0 10,000.00 581.85 177.18 20. O0 427.7~ 456.86 50,706.18 29.82 29.14 65. O0 16.50 50.00 44.02 2,000.00 40.21 TOTAL CHECKS 102,417.30 VOUCHRE2 05/13/93 14:40 FUND TZTLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 COle4UNZTY SERVICES DISTRICT 210 CAPITAL INPROVEHENT PROJ FUND 250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD 320 INFORMATION SYSTENS 330 COPY CENTER FUND TOTAL CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS AMOUNT 9,772.37 1,000.00 22,563.00 117,546.44 23,458.11 1,730.35 4,516.45 180,586.72 PAGE 4 VOUCHRE2 05/13/93 VI;XlCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 1050~ 10505 10505 10506 10506 10507 10508 10508 10509 10510 10511 10511 10512 10512 /-1~512 10514 10515 10515 10515 10516 10516 10516 10516 10516 10517 10517 10518 10519 10519 10519 10520 10520 14:40 CHECK DATE 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME COSTAIN HONES 000102 AMERICAN FENCE COMPANY 000102 AMERICAN FENCE COMPANY 000107 ALHAMBRA GROUP 000107 ALHAMBRA GROUP 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE 000161 EDEN SYSTEMS, INC. 000161 EDEN SYSTEMS, INC. 000164 ESGIL CORPORATION 000224 MELAD & ASSOCIATES 000230 NUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES 000230 HUN! FINANCIAL SERVICES 000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY 000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY 000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY 000270 RJM DESIGN GROUP 000332 000345 000345 000345 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATI XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 000447 CONTRONIX OF HEMET 0004~7 CONTRONIX OF HEMET 000447 COHTRONIX OF HEMET 000447 CONTRONIX OF HEMET 000447 CONTRQNIX OF HEMET 000474 000474 OO0573 ARBOR-PRO TREE SERVICE ARBOR-PRO TREE SERVICE APOLLO SMEEPING~ [NC, 000655 MENTONE TURF SUPPLY 000655 MENTONE TURF SUPPLY 000655 MENTONE TURF SUPPLY 000660 000660 000664 R.W. CASH CONSTRUCTION R.~, CASH CONSTRUCTION WALT RANKIN & ASSOCIATE CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION REFUND/COSTA[N HONES PROVIDE AND FURNISH ALL EMERGENCY REPAIR OF CHA MARCH SERVICES ALHAMBRA GROUP; SUPPLEMENT TO P,O, 1355 TRAINING & TRAVEL EXPEN ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2660 210'190-134-5802~ 190'180-999-5212 210'190,131-580/, 210-190-134-5802 210'190-135-580~ 320'199-999-5248 TRAINING & TRAVEL EXPEN 320-199-999-5248 4/1/93-4/30/93 PLAN CHECK FEES CONTRACT TO PROVIDE CIT CONTRACT TO PROVIDE CIT EUREKA RECYCLED COPIER COLORED COPIER PAPER: 8 TAX RJM DESIGN GROUP APRIL PLAN CHECK SERVIC METER USAGE FOR 5100 XE METER USAGE FOR 5100 XE METER USAGE FOR 5100 XE TK-930HDK; KEffidO00 35 g MAX-8053; MAXRAD 3DB GA SMLNCP; MAXRAD SS LOt,/L LABOR; INSTALLATION OF TAX REMOVE DEAD TREE RANCHO REMOVE DEAD TREE RANCHO EXTRA S~EEPING & CATCH 001-162-999-5248 001-162-999-5248 190-180-999-5525 190-180-999-55Z5 330-199-999-5590 330-199-999-5590 330-199-999-5590 250-190-129-5802 001-162-999-5248 330-199-999-5582 330-199-999-5582 330-199-999-5582 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 001-170-999-5610 100~164'999'5402 100.'164'999'5402 001-166:999-5402 IRRIGATION 210-190-134-5804 PROVIDE AND INSTALL TWO 210-190-134-5804 RETENTION 210-2035 R.W. CASH CONSTRUCTiON 250-190-129-5804 RETENTION 250-2035 LONA LINDA PARK RECREAT 210-190-134-580~ ITEM AMOUNT 2,246.20 994.00 818.00 1,727.14 483.37 4,470.00 1,197.28 533.07 1,470.65 1,864.81 1,500.00 1,500.00 488.00 872.50 105.~ 1,924.71 1,717.95 1,030.68 1,051.89 967.94 894.60 18.63 25.53 100.00 72.75 225.00 775.00 1,361.25 2,780.32 2,682.97 546.33- 23,926.00 2,392.60' 10,419.00 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 2,246.20 1,812.00 2,210.51 4,470.00 1,730.35 1,470.65 1,864.81 3,000.00 1,465.94 1,924.71 1,717.95 3,050.51 1,111.51 1,000.00 1,361.25 4,916.96 21,533.40 10,419.00 VOUCHRE2 05/13/93 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 10522 10523 10524 10524 14:40 CHECK DATE 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 05/25/93 VENDOR NUMBER 000749 000926 000928 000928 VENDOR NAME GOLDEN STATE FENCE CO. SOUTHERN CAL/F EDISON LEKOS ELECTRIC, INC. LEKOS ELECTRIC, INC. CITY OF TEMEOULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION INSTALL BALLFIELO FENCI I~ER RELOCATIOR SENIOR Pkt92-08 TRAFFIC SIGNAL RETENTION ACCOUNT NUMBER 1~:)-180-~-5212 210-1~-801-5804 210-165-611-5804 210-2035 ITEM A!e3UNT 18,745.00 7,325.98 96,899.99 9,690.00- PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 18,745.00 7,325.98 87,209.99 TOTAL CHECKS 180,586.72 ITEM NO. 4 APPROVAT. CITY ATTORNEY .~_ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer DATE: May 25, 1993 SUBJECT: Combining Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1993 and the Statement of Revenues,. Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1993. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council: Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1993 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1993. 2. Appropriate $4,175 for the City Council's Department, #100. 3. Appropriate $140,000 for the City Attorney's Department, #130. 4. Appropriate $17,000 for the Finance Department #140. A residual equity transfer of $55,100 from the General Fund Unappropriated Fund Balance to the Information Systems Internal Service Fund. DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited activity of the City for the nine months ended March 31, 1993. A residual equity transfer of $55,100 is proposed from the General Fund Unappropriated Fund Balance to the Information Systems Internal Service Fund. The purpose of this transfer is to build up a cash balance in this Internal Service Fund for the purchase of computer equipment. The Information Systems Internal Service Fund is depreciating the cost of the equipment over a number of years in order to build a cash balance to purchase replacement equipment. However, because there was no "seed money" provided when this fund was established, this transfer is requested to insure that the fund does not operate in a negative cash position. Please see the attached financial statements for analytical review of financial activity. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment "A" Additional Appropriations Combining Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1993 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1993 V:\WP\REVEXPED.AGN TRANSFER FROM: ACCT. No. I 001 · 001 001 001 Description Fund Balance Fund Balance Fund Balance Fund Balance ATTACHMENT "A" BUDGET TRANSFERS CITY OF TEMECULA Amount $ 4,175 140,000 2,000 15,000 TRANSFER TO: ACCT. No. 001-100- 999-5250 001-130- 999-5246 001-140- 999-5258 001-140- 999-5248 Description Outside Services Legal Services Conference/ Education Consulting Services Amount 4,175 140,000 2,000 15,000 V:\WP\REVEXPED.AGN I,,I,I E= rn 'CD 0 · -- CD 0 0 I'.. (",. O r~ c ITEM NO'. 5 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICE/~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 25, 1993 Installation of Five (5) STOP Signs PREPARED BY: Ben Dobbins, Traffic Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING STOP SIGNS. BACKGROUND: Staff has received several requests for STOP signs in the residential development area bounded by Pala Road on the northeasterly, Via Eduardo on the southeast, Pechanga Creek on the southwest, and Rainbow Canyon Road on the northwest. Staff field investigated the area and found inadequate control at five (5) locations. Due to limited sight distance, Staff recommends the installation of STOP signs at the intersections listed on Exhibit "A" attached. At the April 22, 1993 meeting of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, the Commission recommended that the City Council approve the installation of five (5) STOP signs per Exhibit "A." FISCAL IMPACT: FY92-93: Install five (5) STOP signs with STOP bar and STOP legend (5 signs @ $110/each = $550.00). Funds are available in Public Works Sign Account No. 100-164-999-5244. ATTACHMENT: 1. Exhibit "A" 2.. Resolution pwOl legdrpt193105251fivestop.sgn 050593 The following are proposed "STOP" sign locations: · "TEE" INTERSECTIONS: 2. 3. 4. 5. Southbound Maskuaz Court ~ East Loma Linda Road Southbound Via Consuelo @ Loma Linda Road Southbound Esplendor Court @ Loma Linda Road Northbound Esmerado Court @ Loma Linda Road Westbound East Loma Linda Road @ Loma Linda Road / ,/ EXHIBIT "A" .,.,o~o;,,,.,/s3/os=s/fi,,o.,o...;. ososs3 RESOLUTION NO. 93-- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING STOP SIGNS. The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: Section 1. Pursuant to Section 12.08.301 of the Municipal Code, the following STOP sign locations are hereby established in the City of Temecula: A. Southbound Maskuaz Court @ E. Loma Linda Road; B. Southbound Via Consuelo @ Loma Linda Road; C. Southbound Esplendor Court @ Loma Linda Road; D. Northbound Esmerado Court @ Loma Linda Road; and E. Westbound E. Loma Linda Road @ Loma Linda Road. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the of , 1993. J. Sal Mufioz, Mayor AT'FEST: June S. Greek City Clerk [SEA'LI p:~t~cum~q,.,p pw01 lagdrPt/93/OS25/fivestop.sgn 050593 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA $$ I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temeeula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 93- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temeeula at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of 1993, by the following vote: ' ' COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: - COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: - COUNCILMEMBERS: P:~'~elnfi"em°P"m pw01 lagdrpt/9310525/fivestop.egn 050593 ITEM NO. 6 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFIC. EF.~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 25, 1993 "No Parking" on Rancho California Road at Via Las Colinas PREPARED BY: Ben Dobbins, Traffic Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: . RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONE ON RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT VIA LAS COLINAS. BACKGROUND: Rancho California Road is classified as a major arterial, 86 feet wide curb to curb. The posted speed limit is 40 mph. Via Las Colinas is classified as a local road, 40 feet wide curb to curb. Via Los Colinas now stops for Rancho California Road. Staff field-investigated the intersection of Via Las Colinas and Rancho California Road and found that there is no restriction on parking. Staff recommends a No Parking Zone on the south side of Rancho California Road 1 O0 feet west of Via Las Colinas to improve the sight distance for vehicles who need to enter Rancho California Road (see Sketch "A" attached). At the April 22, 1993 Public/Traffic Safety Commission Meeting, the Commission recommended that the City Council approve the "No Parking" Zone on the south side of Rancho California Road from the west curb line of Via Las Colinas 1 O0 feet westerly. FISCAL IMPACT: FY92-93; Paint 100 feet of red curb (100 feet @ $1.00/L.F. = $100.00). Funds are available in the Public Works Stenciling and Striping Account No. 100-164-999-5410. ATTACHMENT: 1. Map - Sketch "A" 2. Resolution PwO11agdrpt193105251colinas.pkg 050593 C) 0 N SKETCH "A"' ,wo~.o~mus3~os2s~co,....,ko ososs:~ RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONE ON RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT VIA LAS COLINAS. The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: Section 1. Pursuant to Section 12.08.216 of Ordinance No. 91-16, which the City has · 'adopted by reference, the following "No Parking" zone is hereby established in the City of Temecula: "No Parking" on the south side of Rancho California Road from the west curb line of Via Las Colinas 100 feet westerly. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the of , 1993. J. Sat Mufioz, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek City Clerk [SEAL] p:~,y,~a~o,~...pk~ pw01 lagdrPt193105251colinas.pkg 050593 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA S$ I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 93- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the __ day of ,1993, by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBERS': NOES: C OUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: - COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: - COUNCILMEMBERS: p:~'ly,:,~'u'.:di...pkt pw01 lagdrpt193105251colinas.pkg 050593 ITEM NO. 7 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager /~'~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 25, 1993 STOP Sign Control at the Intersection of Mercedes Street and 6th Street PREPARED BY: Ben Dobbins, Traffic Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING STOP SIGNS AT THE INTERSECTION OF MERCEDES STREET AND 6TH STREET. BACKGROUND: It has come to Staff's attention that STOP signs exist at all intersecting streets on Mercedes Street from 3rd Street to 5th Street. The intersection of Mercedes Street and 6th Street is an uncontrolled intersection. Staff recommends the installation of STOP signs at the intersection of Mercedes Street and 6th Street. At the April 22, 1993 Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting, the Commission recommended that the City Council approve the installation of two STOP signs at the intersection of Mercedes Street and 6th Street. FISCAL IMPACT: FY92-93: Install two (2) STOP signs, with STOP bar and STOP legend (2 signs @ $11 O/each = $220). Funds are available in the Department of Public Works Sign Account No. 100-164-999-5244. ATTACHMENT: 1. Resolution pwO11agdrpt/S3/O5251etopeign.res 051893 B. Section 2. RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOL~ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING 'STOP" SIGNS. The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: Section 1. Pursuant to Section 12.08.301 of the Municipal Code, the following "STOP" sign locations are hereby established in the City of Temecula. Northbound 6th Street @ Mercedes Street; and Southbound 6th Street @ Mercedes Street. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVEI} AND ADOFrED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the of ,1993. A77F_,ST: J. Sal Mufioz, Mayor June S. Greek City Clerk [SEAL] V:'*etY~%~ol~ila'm pWO 1 lagdrpt193105251stopsign.ree 051893 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek; City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 93- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the__ day of ,1993, by the following vote: CO~CILM~ERS: NOES: CO~CK]VIEMBERS: ABSENT: - COUNCILlVlEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: e:~eu~q,i~,,, pwO11agdrpt/93/O5251stopsign.res 051893 ITEM NO. 8 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER ~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 25, 1993 Solicitation of Bids for the FY93-94 Annual Street Maintenance Program PREPARED BY: Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize the Public Works Department to solicit bids for the implementation of the FY93-94 Street Maintenance Program. BACKGROUND: Since incorporation, routine street maintenance for the City has been performed by Riverside County (1990-91), and a private maintenance contractor (1991 to present). The City's current maintenance contract was awarded to Ramtek Contractors, Inc. of Temecula on September 24, 1991 with tl~e provision that the contract could be renewed annually by mutual agreement of both parties for up to five years. Subsequently, the contract was renewed for FY92-93 by the City Council on August 11, 1992. Unfortunately, due to business difficulties, Ramtek Contractors, Inc. notified the Public Works Department on April 9, 1993 that they would be unable to complete the contract. Since that time, established purchasing procedures have been used to retain contractors to complete essential maintenance work. The proposed bid package includes the same scope of work that was used in the previous contract. This includes items such as pothole patching, overlays, shoulder grading, sidewalk or curb repair, culvert cleaning, etc. The contract also specifies that the selected contractor maintain a yard within the City limits and provide space within it for a City Maintenance Yard. During FY91-92 and FY92-93, approximately $409,000 and $417,000, respectively, have been expended in routine street maintenance. The bid package is on file in the office of the City Clerk. -1-. PwO1%agdrpt~93~O525~stmaint.eol 0510a FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval of the budget for FY93-94, on June 8, 1993, $450,000 will be allocated under Account No. 5402 for Street Maintenance, and $250,000 will be allocated under Account No. 5401 for Drainage Facilities Maintenance. -2- pwO1\egdrpt~93~O525\stmeint.eol 0510e ITEM NO. 9 APPROVAl CITY ATTORN~;Y R~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager ,,~/,l~im D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 25, 1993 Final Parcel Map No. 24586 PREPARED BY: Jim D. Faul, Engineering Technician RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Final Parcel Map No. 24586. BACKGROUND: Tentative Parcel Map No. 24586, Amendment No. 3, was approved by the City of'Temecula Planning Director, Gary Thornhill, on March 18, 1993. The Developer has met all of the Conditions of Approval. Final Parcel Map No. 24586 isa five (5) lot commercial subdivision of 5.42 acres located at the northwesterly corner of Diaz Road and Via Dos Picos. The site currently has an existing manufacturing building located on Parcel No. 4 of the Parcel Map. Surrounding land uses include vacant land and manufacturing uses. The site is zoned manufacturing service commercial (M-SC) as are all adjacent parcels. The established zoning on the property conforms with the land use designation on the "draft" General Plan for the City of Temecula. The following fees have been paid for Final Parcel Map No. 24586: Traffic Signal Mitigation Fees $12,825.00 -1- PwO5~agdrpt~93~O525~m24586 051793 The following fees have been deferred for Final Parcel Map No. 24586: Area Drainage Fees Fire Mitigation Fees Stephen's K-Rat Mitigation Fees Public Facilities Fee Due prior to building permit Due prior to building permit Due prior to grading permit Due prior to building permit · No bonds are required because there are no public improvements associated with this parcel 'map. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: 2. 3. 4. 5. Development Fee Checklist Project Location Map Final Parcel Map No. 24586 Conditions of Approval Fees & Securities Report -2- PwOS%egdrpt%93%O526%pm24586 OS 1793 CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST CASE NO.: Parcel Map No. 24586 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. FEE Habitat Conservation Plan (K-Rat) Public Facility CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Due prior to grading permit Due prior to building permit Traffic Signal Mitigation Condition No. 15 Fire Mitigation Due prior to building permit Flood Control (ADP) Regional Statistical Area (RSA) Condition No. 11 N/A Library Fees N/A Parks and Recreation (Quimby) N/A pwO5~feul~om24586 PROjE( VIA DOS RANCHO VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Tentative Patrol Map No: 24586, Amendment No. 3 Project Description: Tentative Paw~l Map 24586, Amendment No. 3 is a request to subdivide an existing 5.42 acre parcel into 5 lots in the Manufacturing Service Commercial (M-SC) zone. The project 'site is located at the northwesterly comer of Diaz Road and Via Dos Picos. Asscssor's Parcel No.: 921-040-027 , , PLANNING DEPART1VfF. NT Within forty-eight hours of the approval of this project, the applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Depamnent a cashiers's check or money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount 'of One Thousand Three Hundred dollars ($1,300.00), which includes the One Thousand Two Hundred Fifty dollar ($1,250.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section'711.4(d)(2) plus the Fifty dollar ($50.00) County Administrative fee to enable the City to f~e the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code of Reg.lations 15075. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Depaxtment the check required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents, officer, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Tentative Parcel Map No. 24586, Amendment No. 3, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promp~y notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, .the subdivider shah not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. The tentative subdivision shah comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, ff made 30 days prior to the expiration date. R:XS\STAFFRPT~24556.DH 3/12/93 klb 1 I0. 11. 12. 13. 14. This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460. The expiration date is March 18, 1995. Any delinquent property taxes shah be paid prior to recordation of the final map. ,Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shah be provided from the parcel map boundary to Via Dos Picos, a City maintained road. Subdivision phasing, if applicable, shah be subject. to Planning Depamnent approval. Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate vehicular access to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially conform to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval. A copy of the final grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. All on-site cut and fill slopes shall: a. Be contour-graded to blend with existing natural contours. b. Be a part of the downhill lot when within or between individual lots'. All slopes over three (3) feet in height shall be landscaped and. irrigated according to the City Development Code. A detailed landscaping and irrigation plan, prepared by a qualified professional, shall be submitted to the City Planning Department for review and approval prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho California Water District transmittal dated September 29, 1993, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District transmittal dated March 8, 1993, a copy of which is attached. Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following: ao Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the Manufacturing Service Commercial zone. b, Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Director of Public Works. The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all slopes, landscaped areas and irrigation systems until such time as those operations are the responsibilities of other parties as approved by the Planning Director. All future development will require Plot Plan approval. R:XSXSTAFFR. FrX24586.DH 3112/93 klb 2 PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF ~ FINAL MAP The following items shah be submitted to and approved.by the Planning Director. copy of the Fma Map 16. A copy of the rough Grading Plans 17. A copy of the Environmental Constraints Sheet (F_.CS) which shall identified environmental concerns and shah be permanen~y fried with the office of the City Engineer. The following note shah be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet: au "This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shah comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy. 18. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to recordation. The CC&R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining the open space, parking areas, private roads, signage and exterior of. all buildings. 19. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shah be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City of provisions required by the City as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with.this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City priorto making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. 20. Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) as share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association, owning the common areas and facilities. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUH.rHNG PERMITS 21. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall be shielded from view of surrounding properties. R:XS\STAFFRFI~24586.DH 3112/93 klb 3 PRIOR TO ~ ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PER1VHTS 22. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forch in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shah pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. 23. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shah be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the buildings. 24. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shah be installed underground. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of Public Works. It is understood that the developer correctly shows on the tentative map or site plan all existing and propose,1 easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. GENERAL REQUIREMF~NTS 25. 26. 27. 28. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all on-site flat work and improvements) construction shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. A copy of the grading and improvement plani, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for approval prior to recordation of the final map or issuance of any permits. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. R:\S\STAFFRIq'X24586.DH 3/12/93 I~b 4 29. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS: 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. · The final grading plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the DeparUncnt of Public Works. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge ~liminntion System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has bccn fled or the project is shown to be exempt. All lot drainage shah be directed to the driveway by swales independent of any other lot. · Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shah receive written clearance from the following agencies: · · · · · · · · · San Diego Regional Water Quality Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Planning Department Department of Public Works Riverside County Health Department Community Services District General Telephone Southern California Edison Company Southern California Gas Company A Soils Report shall be.'prepared by a registered soils engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site,. and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. The erosion control plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Department of Public Works. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District prior to issuance of any permit. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has been already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. R:XS\STAFFRPTX24556.DH 3112/93 klb 5 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. The developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off- site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public A Flood Plain Development Permit and drainage study shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for rewiew and approval. The drainage study shall include, but not be limited to, the following criteria: Drainage and flood. protection facilities which will protect all structures by diverting site runoff to streets or approved storm drain facilities as directed by the Depaxtment of Public Works. · Adequate provision shall be made for the acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. C, The impact to the site from any flood zone as shown on the FEMA flood hazard map and any necessary mitigation to protect the site. d. Identify and mitigate impacts of grading to any adjacent floodway. The location of existing and post development 100-year floodplain and floodway shall be shown on the improvement plan. The developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or thro..gh the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI or Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the developer shall provide adequate facilities as approved by the Department of Public Works. A drainage channel and/or flood protection .wall will be required to pwtect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to streets, or to a storm drain. The developer shall protect downstream pwperties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage panems; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing facilities or by securing a drainage easement. A drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners for the release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy of the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review prior to recordation. The location of the recorded easement shall be delineated on the grading plan. The site is in an area identified on the flood hazards maps as Flood Zone "B". All structures shall be protected from this hazard. R:\S\STAFFRPT~245S6.DH 3/12/93 klb 6 45. A permit from the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is requireA for work within their right-of-way. 46. The following criteria shah be observed in the design of the precise grading plans to be submitted to the Department of Pubic Works: a, Flow line grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. Driveways shall conform to the appicable City Standard Nos. 207/207A, 208 and 401 (curb and sidewalk). C, Street lghts shall be installed along the pubic streets adjoining the site in accorclancc with Ordinance No. 461 and shall be shown on the improvement plans as directed by the Department of Pubic Works. All street and driveway 'centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as approved by the Department of Pubic Works. e, Landscaping shall be limited in the comer cutoff area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public slxeet shall be conveyed through under-sidewalk drains. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ENCROACItMR~ PERMITS 47. All necessary grading permit requirements shall have been submitted/accompished to the satisfaction of the Department of Pubic Works. 48. Improvements.plans, including but not limited to, streets, parkway trees, street lights, driveways, drive aisles, parking lot fighting, drainage facilities and paving shall .be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer on 24" x 36" mylar sheets and approved by the Department of Public Works. Final plans (and profiles on streets) shall show the location of existing utility facilities and easements as directed by the Depamnent of Public Works. 49. The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans to be s. ubmitted to the 'Department of Pubic. Works: a, Flow line grades shall be 0.5 % minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b, Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos. 207/207A and 401 (curb and sidewalk). R:\S\STAFFRPTX243~.DH 3/12/93 lr, Jb 7 All su-eet and driveway centerllne intersections shall be at 90 'degrees or as approved by the Depamnent of Public Works. 50. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided for underground, with easements 'provided as required, and designed and · constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. 51. 52. · All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground. · All conditions of the Grading Permit and Encroachment Permit shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. 53. A construction area Waffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public '.Works. PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF FINAL MAP 54. The developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the construction of the following pubfie impwvements in conformante with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of PubLic Works. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive appwaehes, street lights, signing, tnffic signals, and other traffic control devices as appwpriate. 55. The developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement gnaranteeing the construction of the following private improvements in conformante with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. a. Storm drain facilities. · b. Erosion control and slope protection. 56. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: · · · · · · · · · · San Diego Regional Water Quality Rancho California Water District Eastern Municipal Water District Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District City of Temecuh Fire Bureau Planning Department Department of Public Works Riverside County Health Department CATV Franchise Community Services District R: \S\STAFFRPTX245~6.DH 3/12/93 kJb 8 : 57. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. General Telephone Southern California Edison Company; and Southern Ctmlifornia Gas Company Sufficient right-of-way along Diaz Road shah be conveys! for public use to provide for a 50 foot half width right-of-way. Existing improvements shall be reviewed; and ff not per current City standards, they shall be replaced to the satisfaction of the Dcpamnent of Public Works. Sufficient right-of-way along Via Dos Picos shah be conveyed for public use w provide for a 35 foot half width fight-of-way.. Existing impwvements shall be reviewed; and ff not per current City standards, they shall be z~phced to the satisfaction of the DeparUnent of Public Works. Vehicular access shall be restricted on Diaz Road and so noted on the final map as approved by the Depamnent of Public Works. A signing and striping plan shah be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Depamnent of Public Works. Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact the Traffic Engineer for the design requirements. A Transportation Demand Management program may be required. Comer property line cutoff shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated and noted on the final map. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to approval of the final map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map ff they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of de~lication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shah be added to the final map stating "drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions." Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet CECS) shah be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shah be permanen~y fried with the Department of Public Works. A copy of the ECS shah be transmitted to the Planning Depaxtment for review and approval. The following information shah be on the ECS: R:\S\STAFFRFI~24586.DH 3/12193 Iclb 9 a. The delineation of the area within the 100-year floodplain. , b. Special study zone. 68. The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon the ECS recorded with any' underlying maps related to the subject property. 69. 'A declaration of CovenantS, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be prepared by. the developer and submitted to the Director of. Planning, 'City Engineer, and City attorney. The CC&R's shall be signed and acknowledffed by all parties having any record title interest in the property W be developed, shall make the City a party thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City. The CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City and recorded. The CC&R's Shall be submitted to the following Engineering conditions: The CC&R's shall be prepaxed at the developer's sole cost and expense. hs The CC&R's shall be in the form and content approved by the Director of Planning, City Engineer, and the City AtWrney, and shall include such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the interest of the City and its residentS. The CC&R's and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner's Assochtion are subject to the approval of Planning, Department of Public Works, and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City. The CC&R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas, drainage and related facilities. The CC&R's shall pwvide that if the pwperty is not maintained in the condition required by the CC&R's, then ~the City, after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the owner's sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&R's or the City ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. All parkways, open axeas, on-site slopes and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to Planning and the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of building permits. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all wads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by CC&R's or-by deeds and shall be recorded concurrent with the map, or prior to the issuance of building permit where R: ~S\STAFFP, Fr',245~6.DH 3112193 lrJb no map is involved. 70. The developer shall deposit with the Depamnent of Public Works a cash sum as established, per acre, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fees, he may enter into -a written agreement with the City deferring 'said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. 71. The developer. shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street improvements. 72. The developer shall record a written agreement confh-ming owncr's offer to waive all rights to object to the formation of an Assessment District or Community Facilities District for the construction of the proposed "Western Bypass Corridor", and that the owner shall comply with the requirements, if aI~licable. 73.¸ The developer shall record a written agreement conf'n'ming owncr's offer to waive all rights to object to the formation of an Assessment District or Community Facilities District for the construction of the improvements to the Murrieta Creek, and that the owner shall comply with the requirements, if applicable. PRIOR TO BUn J)ING PERMIT 74. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Wor~ for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 75. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, the approved grading plan, the conditions of grading permit, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. 76. The developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIRJNegative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall be in the mount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which the developer requests its building permits for the project, or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to the developer. Concurrently with executing this Agreement, the developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed $10,000. The developer understands that. said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the 'project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, the developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or R:x. SXSTAFFP, PT~24586.DH 3/i2/93 kJb ] ] the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; provided that the developer is not waiving its fight to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the mount thereof. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CE, RTIIqCATE8 OF OCCUPANCY: 77. All impwvements shall be completed and in place per the appwved plans, including but not limited to, curb and gutter, pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, drainage facilities, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets. 78. All signing and striping shah be installed per the approved signing and striping plan. 79. The developer shall provide "STOP" controls at the intersection of local streets with artefial streets as directed by the Department of Public Works. 80. Landscaping shall be limited in the comer cutoff area of all intersection and adjacent to driveways to pwvide for minimum sight distance as directed by the Department of Public 81. Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied only as directed by the Depaxtment of Public Works at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section Nos. 37, 39 and 94 of the State Standard Specifications. R:~'S"STAFFRPT~24586.DH 3/12/93 kib 12 KErINETH L. EDWARDS I H5 MARKET STREET P.O. BOX 1033 RIVERSIDE. CA 92502-1033 ('/14) '275-1200 t'/14) 788-15 FAX RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Hatch 8, 1993 City of Temecula 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Ladies and Gent'lemen: Re: Parcel Hap 24586 Parcel Hap 24586 is located on the northwestern corner of Diaz Road and Via Dos Picos in the City of Temecula. The property is subject to severe flood hazard from Nurrieta Creek. The entire property is located within the 100 year. flood plain limits as mapped by the Federal Emergency Hanagement Agency (FEHA). Some floodin9 occurred on the site in January 1993. Because of the extreme hazard posed by Murrieta Creek, the City should consider not allowing development to proceed adjacent to the creek until the ultimate improvement can b~ constructed. Property adjacent to the creek and within the flood plain should be condi- rioned to construct the required improvements or participate in a financing mechanism such as an assessment district to ensure neces- sary im;rovements are constructed. It should be noted that this tract is located within the limits of the Murrieta Creek/Temecula Valley Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted; applicable fees shall be paid to the City as a part of'the filing for record of the subdivision final map. At the option of the land divider, applicable fees may be deferred to the date of issuance of the first grading or building permit on each parcel. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at time of recorda- tion, or if deferred, at the time of issuance of the actual permit. This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System {NPDES) Permit from the State'Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval, should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been grante~ a permit or is shown to be exempt. A mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, therefore, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements.- A Clean Water Act Section 404 Water Quality Certification 'may be required.from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issu- ance of the corps 404 Permit. City of Temecula Re: Parcel Map 24586 - 2 - March 8, 1993 Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Very tr "yours, ,:' '/~j/~/~/"" LIAHS , Senior Civi 1 Engineer ,. c: Engineering Ventures SEM:bjp lh cho Wmr September 29, 1992 Mr. Craig Ruiz City of Temecula Planning Department 43174 Business Park Drive :l'emecula, CA 9'Z~90 RECEIVED O C T 0 I 1992 Water Availability Parcel Map24586 Dear Mr. Ruiz: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Senga Doherty. Sincerely, R.~u'4CHO CALIFORNIA WATE"' D Steve Brannon, P. E. Manager of Development Engineering S8:SD:aj]OO/F18& CC: Senga Doherty, Engineering Technician I{anrh,. ('alif. rni. Vh,irr I)i~n'ict CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT PARCEL MAP NO. 24586 IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SECURITY .0.00 0.00 Streets and Drainage Water Sewer TOTAL 0.00 $ 0.00 $ DATE: May 18,1993 MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY 0.00 I 0.00 0.00 0.00 *Maintenance Retention $ 0.00 Monument Security $ 0.00 Note: No bonds are required because there are no public improvements associated with this parcel map. DEVELOPMENT FEES City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs RCFCD Drainage Fee Due Fire Mitigation Fee Due Signalization Mitigation Fee - SMD #_ Road and Bridge Benefit Fee Other Developer Fees SERVICE FEES Planning Fee Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan Check Fee Due Inspection Fee Due Monument Inspection Fee Fees Paid To Date Balance of Fees Due 0.00 10,677.40 T.B.D. 12,825.00 N/A N/A 106.00 8.00 850.00 N/A 250.00 0.00 0.00 · 10% Of The Total Faithful Performanoe Security To Be Retained For One Year From The Acceptance Date Of The Improvements By The City pwO5%faul%pm24586 ITEM NO. 10 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMF, CULA, AMENDING ~ OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF ~ CITY FOR ~ CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION CONTAINED IN CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 23, CHANGING THE ZONE FROM R-3-4,000 (GENERAL RESIDENTIAL) TO C-O (COMMERCIAL OFFICE) ON PRO PERTY LOCA TED ON THE SOITIII SIDE OF RANClIO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 4~0 FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF VIA LAS COLINAS AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 944-290-009. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Public hearings' have been held before the Planning Commission and City Council of the City of Temecula, State of California, pursuant to the Planning and Zoning law of the State of California, and the City Code of the City of Temecula. The zoning district as shown on the attached exhibit is hereby approved and ratified as part of the Official Zoning Map for the City of Temecula as adopted by the City and as may be amended hereafter from time to time by the City Council of the City of Temecula, and the City of Temecula Official Zoning Map is amended by placing in effect the zone or zones as described in Change of Zone No. 23 and in the above title, and as shown on zoning map attached hereto and incorporated herein. Section 2. Notice of Adoption. Within 10 days after the adoption hereof, the City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be posted in at least three public places in the City. Section 3. Taking Effect. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its adoption. PASSED, APPROVFI} AND ADOPTEI} this 251h day of May, 1993. ATYEST: J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] Ords 93~11 STATE OF CALrFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 93-11 was duly introduced and placed upon its fn'st reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the llth day of May, 1993, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and tnissed a regular meeting of the City Council on the 2Sth day of May, 1993 by the following roll call vote: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: CO~CILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk Ords 93-11 ITEM NO. 11 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager PI . Gary Thornhill, Director of anmng May 25, 1993 PA93-0038, a request to convert an existing young adult nightclub into an adult only nightclub which will allow the selling and on-site consumption of alcohol. Prepared By: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: It is requested that the City Council: Adopt a resolul~ion entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING PA93-0038, MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AFFIRMING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY SAID APPLICATION TO ALLOW THE CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING YOUNG ADULT NIGHTCLUB INTO AN ADULT ONLY NIGHTCLUB WHICH WILL ALLOW THE SELLING AND ON-SITE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL LOCATED AT 28822 FRONT STREET. BACKGROUND In June of 1991, Administrative Plot Plan No. 153 was approved for the Valley Beat teen nightclub. In April of 1992, the applicant subsequently received City Council approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 19 for this same use. On February 23, 1993, the applicant filed a Minor Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application in accordance with Ordinance No. 93-07 (Adult Business Ordinance) for the conversion of an existing young adult nightclub to an adult nightclub. Ordinance No. 93-07 requires a CUP for the establishment of bars and cocktail lounges. The CUP was filed as a Director approval; however, because of concerns relating to compatibility of the proposed use, the matter was referred by the Planning Director to the Planning Commission for consideration. On April 5, 1993, the City of Temecula Planning Commission voted 5-0 to deny PA93-0038, Minor Conditional Use Permit. R:\S\STAFFR.PT~8PA93.CC 5117193 kJb 1 DISCUSSION The primary issue of concern raised by the Planning Commission during the public hearing for this project was the proximity between the proposed nightclub and the Temecula Teen Center and the Skate City skating rink. The location of the proposed use would be approximately 400 feet from both the teen center and the skating rink. The Temecula Teen Center and Skate City skating rink are uses that cater primarily to minors. The Planning Commission found that the proposed nightclub in this location would result in an incompatibility of land uses. This finding was based on the fact that the teen center and · the skating rink would operate during essentially the same hours as the proposed nightclub. The Planning Commission also found that the sale and on-site consumption of alcohol this close to the teen center and the skating rink would pose a threat to the general health, safety and welfare of the community. Based upon these two findings the Commission denied the appliCant's request. Also discussed during the public hearing was a concern raised by three citizens that there was a history of excessive noise coming from the teen club's sound system. The citizens explained that music would travel across Interstate 15 and could be heard at their residences in the Rancho Highlands development. FISCAL IMPACT None. Attachments 2. 3. 4. 5. Resolution No. 93- - Page 3 Planning Commission Denial Resolution (April 5, 1993) - Page 7 Planning Commission Minutes, April 5, 1993 - Page 8 Planning Commission Staff Report, April 5, 1993 - Page 9 Applicant Letter of Rebuttal and Exhibit - Page 10 R:~S~.STAF'FRPT~SPA93.CC 5/17/93 klb 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 93- R:~S\STAFF'RFi'X38PA93.CC .5/17/93 klb 3 AITACI-IlV~-NT N0. I RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING PA93-0038, MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AFFIRMING THE PLANNING COMMIgSION'S DECISION TO DENY SAID APPLICATION TO ALLOW THE CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING YOUNG ADULT NIGHTCLUB INTO AN ADULT ONLY NIGHTCLUB WHICH WILL ALLOW ~ SELLING AND ON-SITE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL LOCATED AT 28822 FRONT STREET. WHEREAS, in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference, Mr. Stosan Mitich filed PA93-0038, Minor Conditional Use Permit, proposing to allow the conversion of an existing young adult nightclub into an adult only nightclub which will allow the selling and on-site consumption of alcohol located at 2882'2 Front Street. WHEREAS, the proposed project is located in close proximity to the Temecula Teen Center and the Skate City Skating Rink, two uses that cater primarily to minors; WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated City shall adopt a General Plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30- month period of time, the City is not subject to the requirement that a General Plan be adopted and that its decision be consistent with the General Plan if certain findings are made; WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 18.28 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348, a conditional use permit must be denied unless the applicant demonstrates that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Conditional Use Permit on April 5, 1993, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify with either in support or opposition to said Conditional Use Permit and; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after having considered all information presented, the Planning Commission denied Said Conditional Use Permit; WHEREAS, Mr. Stosan Mitich filed an appeal of the Planning Commission decision; WHEREAS, said Appeal application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Staff Report regarding the Appeal; R:XSXSTAFFRPT~38pA93.CC 5/17/93 klb 4 WHEREA~, the City Council conducted a public heating pertaining to said Appeal on May 25, 1993, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Appeal; NOW, THER1;'.PORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Finding. The Temecuh City Council hereby denies PA93-0038, Minor Conditional Use 'Permit based upon the following findings: A. The appellant has failed to demonstrate the proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. B. The proposed project is not consistent with Ordinance No. 348 since the use does not meet all the requirements of Section 18.28 of Ordinance No. 348 which requires that a proposed use not pose a threat to public health, safety and general welfare of the community. C. The project, as proposed, will adversely affect the public health and welfare on the grounds the use will allow the selling and on-site consumption of alcohol in close proximity to the Temecula Teen Center and the Skate City skating rink. D. The project, as proposed, would result in an incompatible land use on the grounds the use will allow the selling and on-site consumption of alcohol in close proximity to the Temecula Teen Center and the Skate City skating rink. Section 2. Environmental Compliance. The proposed project is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act per Section 15061(b)(3). R:~TAFFRPT~SPA93.CC 5117/93 k~ 5 Section 3. PASSEli, APPROVIm AND ADOFrED this 25th day of May, 1993. ATFF_~T: L SAL njRoz MAYOR June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance No.93- was duly introduced and placed upon its fLrSt reading at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 13th day of April, 1993, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 13th day of April, 1993, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: JUNE S. GREEK CITY CLERK R:~STAFFRPT~SPA93.CC 5/17/93 klb 6 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL RESOLUTION APRIL 5, 1993 R:~S~TAF1;]~J~f~BPA93.CC 5/17/93 klb 7 ATTACttMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 93-08 A RESOLUTION OF Tin?. PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING PA93-0038, MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONVERT AN EXISTING TEEN NIGHTCLUB INTO AN ADULT ONLY NIGHTCLUB AND ~ SEI,L1NG AND ON-SITE CONSU1VIPTION OF ALCOHOL LOCATED AT 28821 FRONT STREET, SUITE 203, PARCEL NUMBER 922-093-002. ~, Charles Mitlch fled PA93-0038, Minor Conditional Use Permit in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WI~.REAS, said Minor Conditional Use Permit application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WltF.~, the Planning Commission considered said Conditional Use Permit on April 5, 1993 at which time interested persons had an opportunity to .testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended denial of said Conditional Use Permit; NOW, T!tF~REFORE, Tit'F. PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF TEaVIECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETF./IMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following f'mdings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: B. The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. C. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area .Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SV~rAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. R:\S\STAFFRPT~38PA93.PC 416/93 tjs 6 D. Pursuant to Section 18.28(e), no Conditional Use Permit may be'a~.unless, the applicant demonstrates the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, sifety and weftam of the community, and further, that any Conditional Use Permit approved shall be subject to such conditions as shall be necessary to protect the health, safety and general weftare of the community. E. The Planning Commission, in denying the .proposed Conditional Use Permit, makes the following findings, to wit: 1. There is a reasonable 'probability that PA93-0038, Minor Conditional Use Permit will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, Land Use Component wb: ~::h will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law due to the fact mat the project is consistent with existing zoning of General Commercial and the Draft General Plan Land Use dcsigrmtion of 8orvicc Commercial. (Amended by Planning Cornrnksion on April 5, 1993.) 2. The proposed project is not consistent with Ordinance No. 348 since the use does not meet all the requirements of Section 18.28 of Ordinance No. 348 which requires that a proposed use not pose a threat to public health, safety and general welfare of the community. 3. The project, as pwposed, will adversely affect the public health and welfare on the grounds the use will allow the selling and on-site consumption of alcohol in close proximity to the Temecula Teen Center and the Skate City skating rink. 4. The project, as proposed, would result in incompatible land uses on the grounds the use will allow the selling and on-site consumption of alcohol in close proximity to the Temecula Teen Center and the Skate City skating rink. 5. The proposed project is not subject to the Ca/from Environmental Quality Act per Section 15061(b)(3). Section 2. Environmental Compliance. The proposed project is not subject to the Califorma Environmental Quality Act per Section 15061Co)(3). Section 3. Conditions. The City of Temecuh Planning Commission hereby denies PA93~0038, Minor Conditional Use Permit to convert 'the existing teen nightclub to an adult only nightclub and allow the selling and on-site consumption of alcohol located at 28822 Front Street, Suite 203, APN 922-093-002. The project has been recommended for denial; therefore, no conditions have been prepared. R:\S\STAFFRPT'~38PA93.pC 4/6/93 t~ 7 Section 4. PASSED, APPROVEI) AND ADOPTED this 5th day of April, 1993. LJNDA L. FAHEY CHAIRMAN I FrKREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 5th day of April, 1993 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: -0 PLANNING COM34]SSIONERS: BLAIR, CI-IINLAggF, FAHEY, FORD, HOAGLAND PLANNING COMlvIISSIO~: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: / GAR'Y THORNFrill- SECRETARY : R:\S\STAFFRPT~.38PA93:PC 416/93 tj, 8 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 5, 1993 R:\S~STAFFR,PT~SPA93.CC 5/17/93 kt B DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 5, 1993 retail uses. Bruce Wade, applicant, High Society Family Billiards, advised the Commission that he owns several billiards locations and has not received a citation for selling alcohol to a minor. Mr. Wade also advised that he does not sell alcohol unless you are playing a game of pool. It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Chiniaeff to close the I~ublic hearing at 7:30 P.M. and recommend Adootion of Resolution No. 93- · approving PA 93-0025· Minor Conditional Use.Permit based on the Analysis and Findings contained in the staff report and subject to the Conditions of Approval. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None Commissioner Chiniaeff restated' that if parking becomes a problem for the center, parking may be restricted or must be provided, and could possibly impact future proposed leases for the complex. 8. PA 93-0038, Minor Conditional Use Permit Proposal to convert an existing teen night club to an adult night club located at 28822 Front Street, Suite 203, Temecula. Planner Craig Ruiz presented the staff report. Chairman Fahey questioned why the General Plan Consistency states that the site will likely be consistent with the City's future adopted. General Plan, when the proposed use poses a threat to public health, safety and general welfare. Debbie Ubnoske suggested that a o!ic_y be added requiring that the site be consistent with the General Plan's futur a~n_d_' u_~~~:~_.~, Chairman Fahey opened the public hearing at 7:30 P.M. Chuck Bell, representing Industrial Developers, 113 East Bay Avenue, Newport Beach, stated that the land use is contradictory in Items 1 and 4 and the applicant is proposing the legal use under the zoning of the site. He stated that staff did not include what would be detrimental to public health, safety and welfare, in drinking of alcohol in moderation. Mr. Bell stated that he feels there is less use at the Teen Center, than there was at the Teen Nightclub. He added that he feels the project is a significant distance from the Skating Rink and the Teen Center. Mr. Bell corrected PCMIN4/05/93 419193 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 5, 1993 that staff report description of the property by amending the 10, 140 square feet to 4,800 square feet. Mr. Bell stated that the applicant had received no opposition from existing tenants. St~itiCh, 28822 Front Street, Temecula, expressed that he feels the skating rink and the teen club are rarely used and the proposed club will not interfere with either · of these projects. Leroy LeB!anc, 44041 Quiet Meadow Road, Temecula, spoke in oPPosition to the proposed project. Mr. LeBlanc stated that he experienced excessive noise and foot traffic during the operation of the teen nightclub. Don Alberts, 44089 Northgate Court, Temecula, spoke in opposition to the proposed project. Mr. Alberts advised that he also was negatively impacted by the teen nightclub. Mr. Alberts pointed out that he feels there was a relation to the opening of the teen nightclub and the increase in graffiti in his housing development. M ' St itich stated that during the operation of the teen nightclub, if there were complaints from neighbors, the club operators would work with the neighbors to rectify the problem. Commissioner Chiniaeff stated that the staff reports indicates findings have been made which show that the project is not a compatible use, with the youth activities currently in the same area as the proposed project. Commissioner Blair concurred with Commissioner Chiniaeff. It was moved by Commissioner Chiniaeff, seconded by Commissioner Ford to close the public hearing at 7:55 P.M. and Adopt Resolution No. 93- denying PA93-0038, Minor Conditional Use Permit, based on the analysis and findings contained in the staff report. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey COMMISSIONERS: None Chairman Fahey declared a recess at 7:55 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:05 P.M. Development Ac~reement No. 92-1 (DA 92-1), Change of Zone No. 21 and Tentative Parcel MaD No. 27314 A request to subdivide a 96.7 acre parcel into 4 parcels and a 48.4 acre remainder parcel, a Development Agreement to ensure the development of the project as senior PCMIN4/O5/93 -7- 4~9~93 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APRIL 5, 1993 R:~S~STAFFRPT~8PA93.CC 5/17/~3 klb STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION April 5, 1993 Case No.: Prepared By: PA93-0038, Minor Conditional Use Permit Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: ADOPT Resolution No. 93- denying PA93-0038, Minor Conditional Use Permit based on the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: PROPOSAL: Charles Mitich, Dimensions Nightclub A request to convert an existing young adult nightclub into a adults only nightclub which will allow the selling and on-site consumption of alcohol. LOCATION: 28822 Front Street, Suite 203 EXISTING ZONING: C-P (General Commercial) SURROUNDING ZONING: PROPOSED LAND USE DESIGNATION: North: South: East: West: C-P (General Commercial) C-P (General Commercial) Interstate 15 (I-15) C-1/C-P (General Commercial) Service Commercial EXISTING LAND USE: General Commercial SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: South: East: West: Retail/Commercial Retail/Commercial Interstate 15 (!-15) Vacant R:%S\STAFFRPT\38PA93.pC 3/31/93 tie BACKGROUND On February 23, 1993, the applicant filed a Minor Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application in accordance with Ordinance No. 93-07 for the conversion of an existing young adult nightclub to an adult nightclub. Ordinance No. 93-07 requires a CUP for the establishment of bars and cocktail lounges. Originally, the young adult nightclub was approved through Administrative Plot Plan No. 153 in June of 1991. The applicant also received City Council approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 19 in April of 1992 for this same use. This additional approval was required as a result of a shooting incident that had occurred in March of 1992. This modification was filed as a Director approval; however because of concerns relating to compatibility of the proposed use, the matter was referred to the Planning Commission for consideration. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Proposed use is located at 28822 Front Street, Suite 203. The use occupies an approximately 10,140 square foot, two story suite. Presently, the site is used for the Dimensions young adult nightclub. The Minor Conditional Use Permit is a request to convert the existing nightclub into an adults. only nightclub and to allow the selling' and on-site consumption of alcohol. ANALYSIS A Conditional Use Permit should not be granted unless the apphcant demonstrates that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community. The location of the proposed use would be approximately 400 feet from both the Temecula Teen Center and Skate City skating rink. The Temecula Teen Center and Skate City skating rink are uses that cater primarily to minors. It should be noted that the Teen Center will relocate to the Community Resource Center upon completion of construction. However, the relocation is not anticipated to occur before January of 1994. While the location of this use is 28822 Front Street, the site is orientated to the I-15 freeway and is not visible to Front Street. The orientation of the building makes this use difficult to patrol and monitor by the Temecula Police Department. While this use is permitted in the General Commercial zone, in staff's opinion, the use in this particular location is not compatible with the surrounding uses. The Temecula Teen Center and Skate City will generally be open during the same hours as the proposed nightclub. The sale and on-site consumption of alcohol in close proximity to the Temecula Teen Center and Skate City skating rink would result in an incompatibility of land uses. The Alcohol Beverage Control Board (ABC) considers the Teen Center to be a sensitive use. Sensitive uses within 600 feet of a liquor license request are notified of such a request. If objections are raised, the appeal must go before a hearing body of the ABC. R:\S%STAFFRP'D,38PA93.pC' 3/31/93 tie 2 ZONING AND FUTURE GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY The project site is zoned C-P (General Commercial) and the adjacent parcels are also zoned General Commercial. While the proposed project is consistent with the requirements of 'the C-P Zone, the use is not consistent with Section 18.28 of Ordinance 348 which requires that a proposed use not pose a' threat to public health, safety and general welfare of the community. The proposed Draft General Plan Land Use Designation is Service Commercial. It is anticipated that the site will likely be consistent with the City's future adopted General Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Staff has determined the project is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act per Section 15061 (b)(3). SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS While the project is consistent with Section 9.1 of Ordinance No. 348 (the General Commercial Zone) the proposed Use does not meet the requirement of Section 18.28 of Ordinance 348 for Conditional Use Permits. Section 18.28 requires that proposed uses not pose a threat to public health, safety and general welfare of the community. Due to the proximity of the proposed nightclub to the Temecula Teen Center and the Skate City skating rink, the proposed use has the potential to pose a threat to the health, safety or general welfare of the community. FINDINGS There is a reasonable probability that PA93-0038, Minor Conditional Use Permit will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law due to the fact that the project is consistent with existing zoning of General Commercial and the Draft General Plan Land Use designation of Service Commercial. The proposed project is not consistent with Ordinance No. 348 since the use does not meet all the requirements of Section 18.28 of Ordinance No. 348 which requires that a proposed use not pose a threat to public health, safety and general welfare of the community. The project, grounds the proximity to as proposed, will adversely affect the public health and welfare on the use will allow the selling and on-site consumption of alcohol in close the Temecula Teen Center and the Skate City skating rink. The project, as proposed, would result in incompatible land uses on the grounds the use will allow the selling and on-site consumption of alcohol in close proximity to the Temecula Teen Center and the Skate City skating rink. The proposed project is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act per Section 15061 (b)(3). R:~S\STAFFRPT~38PA93.pC 3/31/93 tie 3 Attachments: 1. 2. Resolution - Blue Page 5 Exhibits - Blue Page 9 A. Vicinity Map B. Site Plan R:\S%STAFFRPT~38PA93.pC 3131/93 tie 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 APPLICANT'S LETTER AND EXHIBIT R:~S'~"TAFFRFT~.38pA93.CC '5117/93 klb 10 April :6, 1993 -j APR 0 6 1993 !'* .....2 ~,'~.': . Exhibits 1 & 2 Use of Teen Center will be leaving shortly, The Teen Center closes at 10:00 p.m., far sooner than proposed club would close. There is a wall between Teen Center and the subject property. Security guards would eliminate potential loitering problems. There are two buildings that physically separate the nightclub and skating rink.. Skating rink would close far sooner than the proposed club. There is also a 3 ft. grade separation between the two properties. About 20-25 jobs can be created locally. We have taken measures to eliminate sound problems across the freeway by building a wall. Since then, we have received no complaints. This happened approximately one month after the club opened, Any potential problems can be resolved through the C.U.P. process. ITEM NO. 12 APPROVA CITY MANAGER TO: FROM:. DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning/ May 25, 1993 Amendments to the Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs. PREPARED BY: David W. Hogan, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: It is requested. that the City Council uphold the Planning Commission's recommendation and deny the Ad-hoc Temporary Sign Committee's proposed amendments to the Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs (Ordinance No. 92- 16). 2. Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 93- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING PORTIONS-OF ORDINANCE NO. 348 AND 92-16 PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF TEMPORARY SIGNS. BACKGROUND: Staff presented the proposed amendments for the Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs to the Council at its April 13, 1993 meeting. At that meeting, the Council requested that staff make an additional change to the Ordinance and bring the proposed Ordinance amendment back on May 25, 1993. In addition, the City Council specifically requested that staff do the following: 1. Provide a summary of the proposed amendments to the Ordinance; and, Amend the Ordinance No. 92-16 to allow for supplemental and direction signs for special community-wide events. R:~S~STAFFRP'~TEMI~IGN.CC 5118/93 klb 1 DISCUSSION: The original Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs was approved by the City Council. on October 12, 1992. The Ordinance allows temporary signs in certain locations for limited periods of time· A matrix summarizing the provisions of the existing Ordinance is contained in Attachment 3. A copy of the text of Ordinance No. 92-16 is included in Attachment 4. Pursuant to Council direction, the Ad-hoc Temporary Sign Committee met on February 13, 1993, and recommended changes for the Planning Commission's and City Council's consideration· The Committee felt that additional changes to the Ordinance were necessary because local businesses needed detached temporary signs and temporary promotional signs for longer periods of time to keep struggling local businesses in operation. As a result, the Temporary Sign Committee recommended the following changes to the Planning Commission: That temporary promotional signs should be allowed up to 75% of the year on a 45-day on and 15-day off pattern. That the moratorium on the enforcement of the temporary sign regulations should be extended for an additional 6 months· That detached temporary signs, up to a total of 32 square feet in size, should also be allowed as long as the detached signs don't block the visibility of other businesses or their signs, block vehicular or pedestrian access, or obstruct the view of motorists. The Committee's recommendations were presented to the Planning Commission on April 13, 1993. During the public hearing portion of the meeting, no public testimony from either the general public or the members of the Temporary Sign Committee was provided to the Commission. After a discussion of the issues, the Planning Commission voted 3-0 to recommend that the City Council deny all the proposed amendments to the Ordinance because of the following reasons: That the proposed amendments would result in the proliferation of temporary signs which would detract from the aesthetics of the community; That the proposed amendments would not address the underlying economic reasons of why many local businesses in Temecula are struggling to stay in business; and, That temporary signs shouldn't be used to compensate for inferior locations or a lack of business visibility. Attachment'2 contains a matrix summarizing the Ad-hoc Temporary Sign Committee's recommended changes to Ordinance No. 92-16, The Planning Commission's recommendation to deny the proposed amendments was presented to the City Council on April 13, 1993. At that meeting, the Council identified an additional concern with the existing Ordinance and directed staff to amend Ordinance No. 92- 16 to allow additional off-site and directional temporary signs for community-wide special events and activities. The proposed Ordinance attached to this Agenda Report would amend R:~STAFFR.PT~TF.M]~IGN.CC 511gl93 klb 2 Ordinance No. 92-16 to allow additional supplemental and directional temporary signage for special community-wide events. The supplemental and directional signage for activities such as the Tractor Races or the Wine and Balloon Festival, would be allowable at the discretion of the Director of Planning. Staff is recommending that guidelines be adopted concerning the size of the additional supplemental and directional signs. This guideline is included in the proposed Ordinance. The maximum size for the supplemental and directional signage is as follows: · For signs on arterial roadways, 32 square feet. · For signs on minor roadways, 24 square feet. In addition, to provide consistency in the Ordinance for Special Event Signs, staff is also recommending that the maximum size for all on-site special event signs be changed from a maximum of 30 square feet to 32 square feet. CONCLUSION: Approval of the Planning CommisSions's recommendation will result in none of the ad-hoc Temporary Sign Committee's recommended changes being made to the existing Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs. The Council's requested modification to the provisions regulating temporary signs for special community-wide events and' activities are included in Attachment 1. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impacts are expected to occur if the Council upholds the Planning Commission's recommendations. Implementing Ordinance No. 92-16, with or without the attached amendments would result in additional costs to the City of Temecula. The actual cost of the program will probably be in excess of the nominal permit fee (930 per application) which the City Council has already approved. The costs of implementing this program include permit processing and tracking, and enforcement activities. Attachments: Ordinance No. 93- Page 4 Existing Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs with the Sign Committee Recommendations Matrix - Page 10 Existing Temporary Sign Ordinance Matrix for Areas Outside of Old Town - Page 12 Ordinance No. 92-16 Page 14 R:\S~STAFFRPT~TE,MPSIGN.CC 5/18/93 klb 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 93-_, R:\S\STAFFP, PT~TEMPSIGN.CC ,5/18/93 klb 4 ATrA~ NO. 1 ' ORDINANCE NO. 93-__ AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL FOR ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AMRNDING FORTIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 348 AND 92-16 PERTAINING TO ~ REGULATION OF TEMPO~Y SIGNS. ~ CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES IiERERy ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. The City Council for the City of Temecula hereby finds the following: A. That the City Council is authorized by Section 65850(b) of State Planning and Zoning Law, to adopt ordinances regulating signs and billboards; B. That there is a need to improve the competitiveness of service and commercial businesses and maintain the aesthetic quality of all areas in the City; C. That them is a need to provide specific and historically appropriate temporary signage in the Old Town area; D. That regulating temporary signage is an effective method to improve the aesthetic quality of all areas in the City; E. That the overuse of temporary signs results in visual clutter, the deterioration of the City 's commercial and service districts, and the inefficient use of business advertising resources; F. That the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan and there is a reasonable probability that this Ordinance will be consistent with the general plan proposal now being considered and studied; G. That pursuant to City Ordinance 90-04, the City Council adopted by reference Riverside County Ordinance No. 348, which the Council has subsequently amended through various City Ordinances; H. The City Council adopted City Ordinance No. 92-16, amending Ordinance No. 348, on October 27, 1992; and, I. That them is a need to amend Ordinance No. 92-16 to improve the ability of the City to regulate and control supplemental and directional signs for special community-side events and activities. Section 2. Subsection D of Section 19.9 of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 is hereby amended to read as follows: R:\SXSTAFFRPTXTEMl~IGN.CC.5/igI93 klb 5 "D. Grand Opemr and Interim Signs. Grand opening and interim signs are permitted in the C-1, C-P, C-P-S, C-T, and M-SC zones and shall comply with the appropriate requirements listed below: 1. For each use or business activity; up to one (1) sign may be allowed. Except for a use or business activity with frontage on two or more arterial streets, then up to two (2) signs may be allowed. 2. Grand opening signs may be permitted once in the first ninety (90) days of business .operation. 3. Interim signs are for interim and emergency purposes and shah contain only the business name and logo. No interim sign may be permitted unless an application for a permit to construct a permanent sign has been filed with the Depamnent of Building and Safety. 4. All Grand opening and interim signs shall be attached to the building where the use or activity is located and shall comply with the following requirements: a. The maximum height of the top of any sign shall not exceed the top of the cave line or parapet wall of the building where the use or activity is located. requirements: b. The dimensions of any sign shall not exceed any the foilowing (1) The surface area shall not exceed thirty (30) square feet. (2) The height (vertical dimension) shall not exceed three (3) feet. (3) The width (horizontal dimension) shall not exceed f'ff-ty percent (50%) of the business or store frontage, whichever is smaller. c. Grand opening and interim signs may be allowed for any period up to forty-five (45) days. The Director of Planning may allow one time extension, for any period up to thirty (30) days, with good cause. It is the responsibility for the proponent of the extension to justify why the extension is appropriate." Section 3. A new Subsection E of Section 19.9 of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348. The existing Subsection E is hereby renumbered to F. The new Section E hereby reads as follows: "E. Special Event Signs. Special event signs maybe located anywhere in the City (including in Historic Old Town Temecula), should be located on the site of the special event or activity being advertised, and shall comply with the requirements listed below: 1. All special event interim signs which are located in a building or structure shall be attached to the building or structure where the use or activity is located and shall comply with the following requirements: R:\S\STAFFRFrXTEM]~SIGN.C'C 5118193 klb 6 a. The maximum height of the top of any sign shah not exceed the top of the eave line or para~t wall of the building where the use or activity is located. requirements: b. The dimensions of any sign shall not exceed any the foilowing (1) The surface area shall not exceed thirty two (32) square feet. (2) The height (vertical dimension) shall not exceed three (3) feet. (3) The width (horizontal dimension) shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the business or store frontage, whichever is smaller. c. Special event signs may be allowed for any period up to forty-five (45) days. The Director of Planning may allow one time extension, for any period up to an additional forty-five (45) days, with good cause. It is the responsibility for the proponent of the extension to justify why the extension is appropriate. 2. All special event interim signs which are not located in buildings or structures shall be securely attached to poles or a structure on the site where the use or activity is located and shall comply with the following requirements: in height. The maximum height to the top of any sign shall not exceed six (6) feet requirements: b. The dimensions of any sign shall not exceed any the following (I). The surface area shall not exceed thirty two (32) square feet. (2) The height (vertical dimension) shall not exceed three (3) feet. feet. (3) The width (horizontal dimension) shall not exceed fifteen (15) c. Special event signs may be allowed for any period up to forty-five (45) days. The Director of Planning may allow one time extension, for any period up to an additional thirty (30) days, with good cause. It is the responsibility for the proponent of the extension to justify why the extension is appropriate. 3. Special event signs for special community-wide events, such as the Tractor Races and Wine and Balloons Festival, may be allowed additional supplemental and/or directional temporary signage at the discretion of the Director of Planning. All supplemental temporary signs should follow the criteria and standards contained in Sections 1 and 2 above. Supplemental directional signage should not exceed thirty two (32) square feet on arterial roadways and eighteen (18) square feet on minor roadways. The appropriate sizes and locations for all supplemental and/or directional temporary signs shall be determined by the Director of Planning." R:\S\STAFFRPTXTEMI~IGN.CC 5118193 Irdb 7 Section 4. Subsection E of Section 19.10 of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 is hereby amended to read as follows: "E. Grand Opening and Interim Signs. Grand opening and interim signs are permitted in the C-l, C-P, C-P-S, C-T, and M-SC zones and shah comply with the appropriate requirements listed below: 1. For each use or business activity; up to one (1) sign may be allowed. Except for a use or business activity with frontage on two or more arterial streets, then up to two (2) signs may be allowed. 2. Grand opening signs may be permitted once in the first ninety (90) days of business operation. 3. Interim signs axe for interim and emergency purposes and shall contain only the business name and logo. No interim sign may be permitted unless an application for a permit to construct a permanent sign has been filed with the DeparUnent of Building and Safety. 4. All Grand opening and interim signs shall be attached to the building where the use or activity is located and shall comply with the following requirements: d. The maximum height of the top of any sign shall not exceed the top of the eave line or parapet wall of the building where the use or activity is located. requirements: e. The dimensions of any sign shall not exceed any the following (1) The surface area shall not exceed thirty (30) square feet. (2) · The height (vertical dimension) shall not exceed three (3) feet. (3) The width (horizontal dimension) shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the business or store frontage, whichever is smaller. f. Grand opening and interim signs may be allowed for any period up to forty-five (45) days. The Director of Planning may allow one time extension, for any period up to thirty (30) days, with good cause.' It is the responsibility for the proponent of the extension to justify why the extension is appropriate." Section 5. CEOA Compliance The City Council f'mds that the regulation of temporary signs in existing commercial, industrial, and retail zones has no possibility of having a significant impact' on the environment. As a result, the adoption of these regulations is exempt from environmental review pursuant to the provisions of Section 15061(h)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines prepared pursuant to Section 21083 of the California ~nvironmental Quality Act, as amended. R:~S~STAFFRPT~TEMI~IGN.CC Sllg/9'J tm 8 Section 6. Effective Date This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this day, the_ day of__ ,1993. ATTEST: SAL MU OZ MAYOR June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temocula, I-I~y DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance No.93- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the __ day of , 1993, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the __ day of , 1993, by the following roll call vote: CO~CII.b~MBERS: NOES: COUNCH, MEMBERS: COUNCH-MEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk R:\S\STAFFRPTXTEMPSIGN.CC ~1181e/3 k.lb 9 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 EXISTING ORDINANCE REGULATING TEMPORARY SIGNS WITH THE SIGN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS MATRIX R:~S%.STAFFRP~TEM:PSION.CC 5/1S/93 klb ATTACHMENT NO. 3 EXISTING TEMPORARY SIGN ORDINANCE MATRIX FOR AREAS OUTSIDE OF OLD TOWN R:\S~STAFFRPT~TEMlaSIGN.CC 5/18/93 klb l:2 Z 0 I- 0 0 0 0 X L) 0 0 X Z ATTACHMENT NO. 4 ORDINANCE NO. 92-16 R:\S\STAFFRPT~TEMPSIGN.CC 5/18/93 klb ORDINANCE NO. 92-16 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TE1V[E~A AMENDING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 348 PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF TEMPORARY SIGNS The City Council 'of the City of Temecula does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following findings: A. That the City Council is authorized by Section 65850(b) of State Planning and Zoning Law, to adopt ordinances regulating signs and billboards; B. That there is a need to improve the competitiveness of service and commercial businesses and maintain the aesthetic quality of all areas in the City; C. That there is a need to provide specific and historically appropriate temporary signage in the Old Town area; D. That regulating temporary signage is an effective method to improve the aesthetic quality of all areas in the City; E. That the overuse of temporary signs results in visual clutter, the deterioration of the City's commercial 'and service districts, and the inefficient use of business advertising resources. F. That the City is preceding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan and that: 1. There is a reasonable probability that this Ordinance will be consistent with the general plan proposal now being considered and studied. 2. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future general plan if this Ordinance is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. 3. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future Old Town Specific Plan if this Ordinance is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. 4. That this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances; and, G. That pursuant to City Ordinance 90-04, the City Council adopted by reference Orals92-16 - 1 - Riverside County Ordinance No. 348, which the Council has subsequently amended through various City Ordinances. Section 2. read as follows: Section 19.2 of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 is hereby amended to "t. 'Temporary Sign" means a sign which is made of cloth, bunting, 'plastic, Vinyl, poster board, painted windows, or other sim~ar materials, and which is located on site of the business use or activity, and is erected or placed for a prescribed period of time to promote, advertise, announce, or provide the following information: (1) Designates, identifies, or indicates the name of the business, owner, or occupant of the premises where the sign is located; or, (2) Advertises the business conducted, the services available or rendered, or goods produced, sold, or available for sale upon the premises where the sign is located. For the purpose of this Ordinance, temporary signs do not include For Sale, Lease or For Rent Signs (which are regulated by Section 19.5), Temporary Political Signs (which are regulated by Section 19.7), or seasonal window displays than contain. traditional holiday characters and messages and which are intended to create or enhance holiday character of an area and do not reference or display service available or rendered, or goods produced, sold or available for sale. u. "Promotional Sign" means a temporary sign intended to attract attention to a use or activity for a limited number of events as identified in this ordinance. v. "Window Sign" means any written representation, emblem or other character, or sign which is painted, attached, glued, or affixed to a window or is otherwise easily visible from the exterior of the building where the advertised product or service is available. w. "Interim Sign" means a temporary sign intended to provide interim signage while the permanent signage is being fabricated, repaired, or prepared for installation. x. "Special Event Sign" means a temporary sign for special community activities or seasonal events. By way of example only, such activities or events may include charitable and community fund raising events, Christmas tree sales, the tractor races, or the annual Temecula wine and balloon festival. y. "Grand Opening Sign" means a temporary sign, bearing the words "Grand Opening", or some similar message to announce the opening of a new business. z. 'Temporary Sign Event' means any number of consecutive days, up to' fifteen (15), for the display of any promotional sign. aa. "Portable Sign" means a sign not designed to be. attached to a Ord s9 2-16 -2- building or permanent structure, vehicle or trailer. Examples of portable signs include, but are not limited to: A-Frames, also known as sandwich boards, and T-Frames, also known aS spring- loaded signs. bb. 'Vehicle Mounted Sign' means any temporary sign attached or mounted on any vehicle or trailer, whether or not the tires and wheels are still attached, and whether or not any such vehicle has an engine or other internal combustion machine contained · within it. cc. "Historic Old Town Temeeula" means the area within the City of Temecula that is bounded by: Merecries Street on the east, 1st Street on the south, the channel of Murrieta Creek on the west, and the intersection of Moreno Road and Mercedes Street on the north." Section 3. as follows: Section 19.9 is added to Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 and shall read "Section 19.9. TEMPORARY SIGNS. No person shall erect, place, or install any temporary sign that is in violation of the provisions of this Article. A. Permit Required. A Temporary Sign Permit shall be required prior to the placing, erecting, or installing of any promotional, special event, grand opening, or interim sign. All. such temporary signs shall comply with the provisions of this ordinance and all other applicable laws and ordinances. An application for a permit shall be made on the forms and in the manner specified by the Director of Planning and shall be accompanied by the required fees or removal bond set by resolution of the City Council. The following procedure shall govern the application for, and issuance of, all temporary sign permits under this Article: 1. Within ten' (10) working days of receipt of a completed application for a Temporary. Sign Permit, the Director of Planning shall either: a. Issue the Temporary Sign Permit, if the sign(s) that is the subject of the application conforms in every respect with the requirements of this Article; or b. Deny the Temporary Sign Permit if the sign(s) that is subject of the application falls in any way to conform with the requirements of this Article. The Director of Planning shall specify in any denial the section or sections of the Article with which the sign(s) is inconsistent. 2. In addition to the temporary sign standards listed in this section, the Director of Planning may attach to any Temporary Sign Permit conditions of approval deemed necessary to ensure the compatibility with the surrounding area and to protect the public health, safety, or welfare. Prohibitions. All Temporary Signs not expressly permitted by this. Ordinance are Ords92 - 16 -3- prohibited, including but not limited to the following:. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Portable signs, .including, but not limited to animals, human beings, A-Frames, T-Frames, and those of a similar nature located in the public right-of-way or on public property. Portable ~signs, including, but not limited to animals, human beings, A-Frames, T-Frames, and those of a similar nature located on private property. Vehicle mounted signs. Pennants and streamers. Promotional signs, except as permitted by this Section. Interim signs, except as permitted by this Section. Special event signs, except as permitted by this Section. Grand opening signs, except as permitted by this Section. Window signs occupying more than ten percent (10%) of the non-door window area, except as permitted by this Section. Flashing or rotating temporary signs. Off-site temporary signs. Temporary roof signs. Temporary signs on public property or in the public fight-of-way, except as permitted under Section 19.9.E of this Ordinance. Temporary signs in Historic Old Town Temecula, except as permitted under Section 19.10 of this Ordinance. C. Promotional Signs. Promotional signs are permitted in the C-l, C-P, C-P-S, C-T, and M-SC zones and shall comply with the appropriate requirements listed below: 1. For each use or business activity; only one (1) promotional sign may be allowed, except that for a use or business activity with frontage on two or more arterial streets, up to two (2) promotional signs may be allowed. Window signs occupying more than ten percent (10%), and not greater than twenty five percent (25%) of the non-door window area shall be considered equivalent to one (1) promotional sign for purposes of this Section. 2. All promotional signs shall be attached to the building where the use or activity is located and shall comply with the following requirements: a. The maximum height of the top of any promotional sign shall not exceed the top of the eave line or parapet wall of the building where the use or activity is located.- be following requirements: The dimensions of any promotional sign shall not exceed any the (1) The surface area shall not exceed fifty (50) square feet. Ords92-16' (2) The height (vertical dimension) shall not exceed three (3) feet. (3) The width (horizontal dimension) shall not exceed sixty percent (60%) of the business or store frontage, whichever is smaller. 3. Promotional signs that are locatexi on window surfaces shall not exceed twenty five percent (25 %) of the non-door window area, except that no permit shall be required for promotional window signs that cover ten percent (10%) or less of the non-door window surface area. 4. The maximum duration for promotional signs, shall not exceed any of the following prescribed time periods: consecutive days); or, Up to two (2) consecutive Temporary Sign Events, (ie. thirty (30) b. A total of four (4) Temporary Sign Events per calendar year. D. Grand Opening. Interim and Special Event Signs. Grand opening, interim, and special event signs are permitted in the C-I, C-P, C-P-S, C-T, and M-SC zones and shall comply with the appropriate requirements listed below: 1. For each use or business activity; up to one (1) sign may be allowed. Except for a use or business activity with frontage on two or more arterial streets, then up to two (2) signs may be allowed. 2. Grand opening signs may be permitted once in the first ninety (90) days of business operation. 3. Interim signs are for interim and emergency purposes and shall contain only the business name and'logo. 4. Special event signs for special events shall be located close to the activity or event being advertised. 5. Signs for communitywide events and activities, such as the Tractor Races or the Temecula Wine and Balloon Festival, are allowed only on the site of the proposed event and are issued only to the organization or individuals organizing or promoting the event. 6. All Grand opening, interim and special event signs shall be attached to the building where the use or activity is located and shall comply with the following requirements: a. The maximum height of the top of any sign shall not exceed the top of the eave line or parapet wall of the building where the use or activity is located. b. The dimensions of any sign shall not exceed any. the following Ords92:16 -5- requirements: feet. O) (2) The surface area shall not exceed thirty (30) square feet. The height (vertical dimension) shall not exceed three (3) (3) The width (horizontal dimension) shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the business or store frontage, whichever is smaller. c. Grand opening, interim and special event signs may be allowed for any period up to forty-five (45) days. The Director of Planning may allow one time extension, for any period up to thirty (30) days, with good cause. It is the responsibility for the proponent of the extension to justify why the extension is appwpriate. .. E. Hardship Provision. The Director of Planning may approve a Hardship Situation Temporary Sign Permit in cases of extreme hardship and unusual circumstances relating to the property where the business is located, including off-site construction activities that may disrupt the public's access to the business. Hardship Situation Temporary Signs shall be granted only when, because of special circumstances applicable to the property, the strict application of the Temporary Sign Ordinance deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under the identical zoning classification. 1. The proponent of a request for a hardship situation temporary sign shall be responsible for clearly demonstrating that an extreme hardship and unusual circumstance exists, and that the extreme hardship and unusual circumstances warrants the approval of a hardship situation temporary sign, and that strict implementation of the Temporary Sign Ordinance deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under the identical zoning classification. 2. The Director of Planning may issue a Temporary Sign Permit for a hardship situation for any period up to six (6) months. Determination of the number, size, and location of temporary signs for hardship situations shall be at the discretion of the Director of Planning. 3. Any hardship temporary sign permit issued shall be conditioned to ensure that said permit does not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and in the same zone, to ensure compatibility with surrounding area and to protect the public health, safety or welfare." Section 4. as follows: Section 19.10 is added to Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 and shall read "Section 19.10. TEMPORARY SIGNS IN HISTORIC OLD TOWN TEMECULA. No person.shall erect, place or install any temporary sign in Historic Old Town Temecula in violation of the provisions of this Article. Ords92-16 -6- A. Permit Required. A Temporary Sign Permit shall be required prior to the placing, erecting, or installing of any promotional, special event, grand opening, or interim sign. All such temporary signs shall comply with the provisions of this ordinance and all other applicable laws and ordinances. An application for a permit shall be made on the forms and in the manner specified by the Director of Planning and shall be accompanied by the required fees or removal bond set by resolution of the City Council. The following procedure shall govern the application for, and issuance of, all temporary sign permits under this Article: 1. Within ten (10) working days of receipt of a completed application for a Temporary Sign Permit, the Director of Planning shall either: a. Issue the Temporary Sign Permit, if the sign(s) that is the subject of the application conforms in every respect with the requirements of this Article; or b. Deny the Temporary Sign Permit if the sign(s) that is subject of the application falls in any way to conform with the requirements of this Article. The Director of Planning shall specify in any denial the section or sections of the Article with which the sign(s) is inconsistent. 2. In addition to the temporary sign standards listed in this section, the Director of Planning may attach to any Temporary Sign Permit conditions of approval deemed necessary to ensure the compatibility with the surrounding area and to protect the public health, safety, or welfare. B. Old Town Local Review Board. The Director of Planning is hereby authorized to consult with the Old Town Local Review Board to prepare any supplemental requirements regulating the size, shape, materials, color, or character of temporary signs in Historic Old Town Temecula that the Director deems necessary to maintain the character of Old Town. C. Prohibitions. All Temporary signs not expressly permitted by this Ordinance are prohibited, including but not limited to the following: 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Portable signs, including, but not limited to animals, human beings, A-Frames, T-Frames, and those of a similar nature located in the public right-of-way or on public property. Portable signs, including, but not limited to animals, human beings, A-Frames, T-Frames, and those of a similar nature located on private property. Vehicle mounted signs. Pennants and streamers. Promotional signs, except as permitted by this Section. Interim signs, except as permitted by this Section. Special event signs, except as permitted by this Section. Grand opening signs, except as permitted by this Section. Window signs occupying more than ten percent (10%) of the non-door window area or six (6) square feet, .whichever is greater. Flashing or rotating temporary signs.- Orals92-16 -7- 11. 12. 13. Off-site temporary signs. Temporary roof signs. Temporary signs on public property or in the public fight-of-way. D. Promotional Signs in Historic Old Town Temecula. Promotional signs in Historic Old Town Temecula are permitted in the C-l, C-P, C-P-S, and M-SC zones and shall comply with the requirements listed below: may be allowed. For each use or business activity; up to one (1) attached promotional sign 2. Promotional signs in Historic Old Town Temecula shall be attached to the building where the use or business activity is located and shall comply with the following requirements: a. The maximum height of the top of any temporary sign shall not exceed the top of the cave line or parapet wall of the building where' the use or activity is located. No promotional sign shall be erected or placed so as to interfere with normal pedestrian and vehicular traffic. b. The surface area shall not exceed twelve (12) square feet. c. Promotional signs shall be made of non-glossy material with a fabric or cloth-like appearance and shall use dull, non-primary, non-fluorescent, and non- iridescent colors. 3. The maximum duration for any promotional sign, for any business use or activity, shall not exceed any of the following standards: consecutive days); or, Up to two (2) consecutive Temporary Sign Events, (ie. thirty (30) b. A total of four (4) Temporary Sign Events per calendar year. E. Grand Opening. Interim and Special Event Signs in Historic Old Town Temecula. Grand opening, interim, and special event signs in Historic Old Town Temecula are permitted in the C-l, C-P, C-P-S, and M-SC zones and shall comply with the requirements listed below: 1. For each use or business activity; up to one (1) grand opening or interim sign may be allowed. 2. Grand opening signs are permitted once in the first ninety (90) days of business operation. 3. Interim signs are for interim and emergency purposes and shall contain only the business name and logo. Orals92-16 -8- 4. Special event signs for special events shall be located close to the activity or event being advertised. 5. Signs for communitywide events and activities, such as the Tractor RaCes or the Temecula Wine and Balloon Festival, are allowed only on the site of the proposed event and are issued only .to the organization or individuals organizing or promoting the event. 6, Grand opening, interim and special event signs in Historic Old Town Temecula shall be attached to the building where the use or activity is located and shall comply with the following requirements: a. The maximum height of the top of any sign shall not exceed the top of the eave line or parapet wall of the building where the use or activity is located. b. The dimensions of any grand opening, interim or special event signs shall not exceed a surface area of twelve (12) square feet. c. Shall be made of non-glossy material with a fabric or cloth-like appearance and shall use dull, non-primary, non-fluorescent, and non-iridescent colors. d. Grand opening, interim and special event Signs may be allowed for any period up to forty-five (45) days. The Director of Planning may allow one time extension, for any period up to thirty (30) days, with good cause. It is the responsibility of the proponent of the extension to justify why the extension is appropriate. F. Hardship Provision. The Director of Planning may approve a Hardship Situation Temporary. Sign Permit in Historic Old Town Temecula in cases of extreme hardship and unusual circumstances relating to the property where the business is located, including off-site construction activities that may disrupt the public's access to the business. Hardship Situation Temporary Signs shall be granted only when, because of special circumstances applicable to the property, the strict application of the Temporary Sign Ordinance deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under the identical zoning classification. 1. The proponent of a request for a hardship situation temporary sign shall be responsible for clearly demonstrating that an extreme hardship and unusual circumstance exists, and that the extreme hardship and unusual circumstances warrants the approval of a hardship situation temporary sign, and that strict implementation of the Temporary Sign Ordinance deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under the identical zoning classification. 2. The Director of Planning may issue a Temporary Sign Permit for a hardship situation for any period up to six (6) months. Determination of the number, size, and location of temporary signs for hardship situations shall be at the discretion of the Director of Planning. Ords92-16 · -9- 3. Any hardship temporary sign permit issued shall be conditioned to ensure that said permit does not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and in the same zone, to ensure compatibility with the surrounding area and the Old Town Specific Plan, and to protect the public health, safety or welfare." Section 5. Grandfather Clause Those temporary signs established prior to the Effective Date of this ordinance, with the exception of those temporary signs described in Section 19.9(B)(1), (3) and (13), and Section 19. 10(C)(1), (3) and (13), are hereby grandfathered and permitted through April 13, 1993. After said date, no temporary signs may be established unless otherwise permitted under this Ordinance. Section 6. 'Violations It shall be unlawful for any person to violate any provision of this ordinance. Any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of an infraction or misdemeanor as hereinafter specified. Such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of this ordinance is committed, continued, or permitted. Any person so convicted shall be, (1) guilty of an infraction offense and punished by a fine not exceeding One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) for a first violation; and (2) guilty of an infraction offense and punished by a free not exceeding Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) for a second infraction. A third and any additional violation shall constitute a misdemeanor offense and shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) or six (6) months in jail, or both. Notwithstanding the above, a tirst offense may be charged and prosecuted as a misdemeanor. Payment of any penalty herein shall not relieve a person from the responsibility for correcting any violation. Section 7. Severability The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the vaiidity of the remaining parts of this ordinance. Section 8. CEOA Compliance The City Council finds that the regulation of temporary signs in existing commercial, industrial, and retail zones has no possibility of having a significant impact on the environment. As a result, the adoption of these regulations is exempt from environmental review pursuant to the provisions of Section 15061Co)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines prepared pursuant to Section 21083 of the 'California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. Ords92-16 -10- Section 9. Effective Date This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places. cia H. Birdsall, Mayor ATTEST: J u ne.~ree k~~ [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance No. 92-16 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 6th day of October, 1992, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 271h day of October, 1992, by the following roll call vote. AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Moore, Munoz, Parks, Birdsall COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCILMEMBERS: None Orals92-16 -11 - ITEM NO. 13 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY' FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning(~' May 25,1993 Vesting Tentative Tract Map 26941 (Crowne Hill Estates, a subdivision of a 133 acres into 28 residential lots) and Change of Zone No. 22 (to change a portion of the project from R-A-5 TO R-A-2 ~ and to change a portion of the project R-A-2~ TO R-A-5) Prepared by: Craig D.Ruiz, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: It is requested that the City Council: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING OF CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 22 TO CHANGE THE ZONING FROM R-A-5 TO R-A-2~ FOR PORTIONS OF LOTS 8, 9, 12, 13, 17, 18, 26, 27 AND 28 AND A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-A-2% TO R-A-5 FOR A PORTION OF LOTS 4 AND 10 FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 26941, AND TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 26941, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A 133 ACRE PARCEL INTO 28 CUSTOM SINGLE FAMILY LOTS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET SOUTH OF PAUBA ROAD AND 1800 FEET WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD. BACKGROUND In June of 1991, the applicant filed the above referenced project with the City of Temecula. On January 4, 1993, the Temecula Planning Commission first heard this project. The project was continued to the February 1,1993 meeting. At this meeting the Commission voted 4-0-1 to recommend approval to the City Council for Change of Zone No. 22 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map 26941. DISCUSSION The primary issues of concern raised by the Planning Commission during the public hearing involved the size of lots 7, 8, and 9. Lots 7, 8, 9 were proposed .to be 3.9 acres, 4.2 acres and 4.4 acres respectively. The Commission recommended that the three lots be combined R:\S\STAFFRPT~26941 .CC 5/17/93 Idb into two lots. The two lots would be divided along the natural drainage course that runs between the two lots. The action reduced the total number of lots to 27. The reduction of the one lot would result in all lots 'along the easterly project boundary being a minimum of 5 acres in size. The Commission felt the 5 acre lot size would provide an adequate buffer between the' R-1 development to the west and the 5 acre estate lots to the east in the Pauba Ranchos development which is in the County of Riverside. Subsequent to the February 1, 1993 meeting, the applicant revised their map which provides for 5 acres lots along the easterly property boundary without deleting a lot (see Exhibit 5). The second issue involved deleting the connection of Castell Way to Cee Cee Lane. The Commission requested that Castell Way terminate in a cul-de-sac at the park site in the southeasterly corner of the project. The applicant has made this change to the map. The third issue for the Commission concerned providing equestrian access to the 100-year flood 'plain that runs through lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and to the 14 foot equestrian easement that runs along the easterly boundary of the' project. Condition No. 11 has been modified to reflect said access. Numerous concerns were raised .during the public testimony by the residents of the Pauba Ranchos home owners (see attachment No. 8). These concerns related to traffic, street maintenance, equestrian trails, lot sizes, environmental. review, air strip easement, street lighting, and construction activities. It was determined by the Commission and staff that most of these issues relate to the previously approved project (VTM 23143, Crowne Hill) to the west of this proposed project. The issues raised by the Pauba Ranchos home owners that pertain to this project were lot sizes, street access and the air strip easement. These isse were resolved as follows: Lot Size: All lots along the easterly property line of the project will be 5 acres in size. Street Access: Castell Way has been conditioned to be a cul-de-sac to restrict access from the project site to the Pauba Ranchos 8reB. Air Strip Easement: The developer will be required to disclose the proximity of the airstrip in the "White" report which is filed with California Department of Real Estate. The developer will be required to grant an avigation easement to the airstrip. (refer to Conditions 14 & 15 and Exhibit 5 of the February 1, 1993 Planning Commission staff report) R:~S~STAFFRPT~26941 .CC 5/17/93 Idb Attachments: 2. 3. 4. 5. Resolution No. 93- - Page 4 Conditions of Approval - Page 10 Planning Commission Approval Resolution 93- - Page 26 Planning Commission Minutes of January 5, 1993 and February 1, 1993 - Page 27 Planning Commission Staff Reports of January 5, 1993 and February 1, 1993 - Page 28 Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 26941 - Page 29 Environmental Impact Report No. 230 - Page 30 Pauba Ranchos HOA Handout - Page 31 R:~S~STAFFRPT~26941 .CC 5117/93 klb ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 93- R:~S~STAFFRP"I'~26941 .CC 5117/93 Idb ATrACHlV~NT NO. 1 RF_,SOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLIrHON OF THE, CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 22 TO CHANGE THE ZONING FROM R-A-5 TO R-A-2% FOR PORTIONS OF LOTS 8, 9, 12, 1:5, 17, 18, 26, 27 AND 28 AND A 'CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-A-2xA TO R-A-5 FOR A PORTION OF LOTS 4 AND 10 FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 26941, AND TO RECOMlVlEND APPROVAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 26941, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A 133 ACRE PARCEL INTO 28 CUSTOM SINGLE FAMILY LOTS LOCATRn APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET SOUTH OF PAUBA ROAD AND 1800 FEET WEST OF BUTtERFIELD STAGE ROAD. WHEREAS, Taylor Woodrow Homes filed Change of Zone No. 22 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said applications were processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said applications on January 4, 1993 and February 1, 1993, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended approval of said applications; WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public heating pertaining to said Appeal on May 25, 1993, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Application; NO~', THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with. the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: R:\S\STAFFRPT~26941 .CC 5/17/93 klb general plan. The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the 2. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building pertnits, each of the following: a. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as mended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General- Plan. C. The City Council in recommending approving of said applications makes the following findings, to wit: Change of Zone No. 22 1. There is a reasonable probability that Change of Zone No. 22 will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State Law, due to the fact that the density of the project, .21 dwelling units/acre, is consistent with the Very Low Density Residential Land Use designation of the future General Plan. Furthermore, the proposed R-A-2~A and R-A-5 zones will be consistent with the Very Low Density Residential Zoning District. 2. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference, with the future General Plan if Change of Zone No. 22 is ultimately inconsistent with the Plan, due to the fact that the project is consistent with the existing large lot custom single family developments in the immediate vicinity and their underlying zones. 3. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses since the proposed large lot custom single family dwellings are consistent with the existing large lot custom single family dwellings and the vacant land surrounding the project. R:%SXSTAFFRPT~28941 .CC 511 7/93 Idb 4. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on the environment since mitigation measures of Environmental Impact Report No. 230 and the Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 230 have been incorporated to the project design. and Conditions of Approval have been prepared for Vesting Tentative Map 26941 to reduce the impacts to a level of insignificance. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 1. There is a reasonable probability that Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State Law. The project, as conditioned, conforms with existing applicable city zoning ordinances and development standards. Furthermore, the proposed density of the project, .21 dwelling units per acre, is consistent with the future General Plan Land Use Designation of Very Low Density Residential. 2. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with the City's future General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the Plan, since the surrounding land uses are large lot custom single family dwellings and vacant land. 3. The proposed use or action as conditioned complies with State planning and zoning laws, local Ordinance Nos. 348 and 460; and California Governmental Code Sections 65000-66009 (Planning and Zoning Law). 4. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or welfare since all impacts have been mitigated to a level of insignificance. 5. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses since the proposed large lot custom single family dwellings are consistent with the existing large lot custom single family dwellings and the vacant land surrounding the project. 6. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the built or natural environment as determined in Environmental Impact Report No. 230, the Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 230, and the conditions of approval for this project. 7. Said Findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference, due to the fact that they are referenced in the attached Staff Report, Exhibits, Environmental Impact Report, and Conditions of Approval. 8. The Planning Commission has considered the effect of its action upon the housing needs of the region and has balanced these needs against the public service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environmental resources (Gov. Code Section 66412.3) and finds that the project density is consistent with SWAP and the future General Plan. Additionally, it will provide more diversity in the housing type available to the residents of the City of Temecula. R:\S~STAFFRP'~26941 .CC 5/1 7193 klb 9. The proposed project will not result in discharge of waste into the existing sewer system that is in violation of the requirements as set out in Section 13000 et seq. of the California Water Code by requiring the project to comply with Eastern Municipal Water District's requirements. ' 10. The design of the subdivision provides to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision (Gov. Code Section 66473.1) by limiting the height of the future structures 'to 32 feet and requiting setbacks according to the Residential Agriculture (R-A) standards. 11. The project has acceptable access by means of dedicated right-of-way and has been conditioned to have secondary access from Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23143, Amendment No. 5 for the necessary right-of-way for secondary access. 12. The project will not have a significant adverse affect on the environment. The County of Riverside Board of Supen, isors certified EIR No. 230 in conjunction with the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. -23143 Amended No. 3 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22430. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 and Change of Zone No. 22 will not result in any new or substantially increased environmental impacts. F. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, the Vesting Tract Map proposed is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. Section 2. Environmental Compliance. An Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 230 was prepared for this project indicates that the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment with the incorporation of the mitigation measures into the project design. Section 3. Conditions. The City of Temecula City Council hereby approves Change of Zone No. 22 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941, a request to subdivide a 133 acre parcel into 28 large lot custom single family lots located south of Pauba Road, north of De Portola Road, east of Via None and west of Butterfield .Stage Road subject to the following conditions: A. Attachment No. 2, attached hereto. RAS~STAFFRPT~26941 .CC 5117/93 Idb Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this 25th day of May, 1993. ATFEST: L SAL MLr~OZ MAYOR June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance No.93- was duly introduced and placetl upon its fLrSt reading at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 13th day of April, 1993, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 13th day of April, 1993, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: JUNE S. GREEK CITY CLERK R:~SXSTAFFRP'D. 26941 .CC ' 511 7/93 Idb ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:~S~STAFFRP'r'~26941 .CC 5/I 7~93 Idb CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Vesting Tentative Tract Map No: 26941 Project Description: To subdivide 133 acres into 28 Custom Single Family:Residential Estate Lots. Assessor's Parcel No.: 952-030-002 952-030-003 952-030-007 952-030-010 Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: Within forty-eight (48) hours of the approval of this project the applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Eight Hundred, Seventy-Five Dollars ($875.00) which includes the Eight Hundred, Fifty Dollar ($850.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Twenty-Five Dollar ($25.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code of Regulations 15094. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460 unless modified by the conditions listed below. This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the approval date. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents, officer, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, ot proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the R:\S\STAFFRPT~26941 ,CC 5/I 7/93 Idb 10. 11. City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. Tho dovolopmont of thio projoot oholl bo oonoiotont with Dovolopmont Agrooment Ne. ~ (deleted by Planning Commission January 4, 1993) The development of this project shall be consistent with the Design Guidelines prepared by Planning Design Solutions. All walls and fences shall be consistent with the approved Design Guidelines for location and materials. All monumentat(on within the project shall be consistent with the Planning Design Solutions Design Guidelines for location and materials. .. A biological assessment of the Gnatcatcher shall be required prior to issuance of grading permits, if the species is listed as endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife and/or the California Department of Fish and Game. Necessary mitigation measures acceptable to these agencies shall be implemented prior to issuance of grading permits. Rough and precise grading plans shall be in substantial conformance with the approved Vesting Tentative Map Grading and Drainage Plan. Street trees shall be provided at approximately 60 foot intervals or a minimum of one tree per lot frontage as required in Section 13.1 or Ordinance 460. Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. The CC&R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining the open space, 100-year flood plain, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, and exterior of all buildings. (amended by staff February 1, 1993) No lot or dwelling unit in the development Shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. R:~S\STAFFRPT~28941 .CC 5/17/93 klb 12. 13. 14. PRIOR 15. Maintenance for all landscaped and open areas, including parkways, shall be provided for in the CC&R's: The CC&R's shall state that the developer of each individual lot shall develop in conformance with the building pad area as shown on the approved rough and precise grading plans. Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) as share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association, owning the common areas and facilities. The CC&R's shall state that portions of lots 4,5,6,7,8 and 10 are located within the l O0-year flood plain and may not be disturb in any manner and no structures or structures shall be constructed. An exhibit shall accompany the CC&R's to delineate this area. (amended by Planning Commission January 4, 1993) The CC&R's shall provide for equestrian access to the 100-year flood plain from the 14' equestrian easement that runs along easterly property boundary of the project. The corporation, association, property owner's group, or similar entity shall maintain said access. (added by Planning Commission February 1, 1993) Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following: Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the Residential Agriculture (R-A-5 and R-A-2 ~) zone. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Director of Building and Safety. The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all slopes, landscaped areas and irrigation systems until such time as those operations are the responsibilities of other .parties as approved by the Planning Director. The applicant, their assignees and successors shall provide and distribute an airport disclosure statement to all potential home buyers of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 26941. Said disclosure shall be distributed separately and in addition to the public report prepared for the Department of Real Estate. Said disclosure shall be presented to and signed by the potential home buyer, prior to entering into any contract for purchase. Said disclosure shall be approved by the Planning Director as to form, and shall advise of potential airport impacts, and the potential requirement of an avigation easement. (amended by Planning Commission January 4, 1993) TO RECORDATION: An avigation easement to the Pauba Ranchos Airstrip shall be granted. Said easement shall be approved by the Planning Director and City Attorney as to form and content. (Amended by Planning Commission January 4, 1.993) R:~S\STAFFRPT~26941 .CC 5117~93 Idb 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. An easement for maintenance of the 100-year flood plain shell be granted to the Home Owners Association. (Amended by Planning Commission January 4, 1993) Subdivision phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning Department approval. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordat(on of the final map. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordat(on of the final map. Prior to recordat(on of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. The following notes shall be placed on the ECS: "This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy." "EIR No. 230 and an Addendum to this EIR was prepared for this project and is on file at the City of Temecula Planning Department." "A portion of lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 10 are located within the 100-year flood plain and shall be maintained as permanent open space. This area shall not be disturbed in any manner and no structures or obstructions shall be allowed." This area is to be identified on the ECS sheet. (amended by Planning Commission January 4, 1993) 21. An avigation easement to the Pauba Ranchos Airstrip shall be granted. Said easement shall be approved by the Planning Director and City Attorney as to form and content. (amended by Planning Commission January 4, 1993) A mitigation monitoring program shall be submitted to identify all environmental mitigation measures contained in the Conditions of Approval, Environmental Impact Report No. 230 and Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 230. This program shall identify the impacts, the mitigation measures, the stage of the development the mitigation measures are to be enforced and the responsible party for monitoring the mitigation measures. All costs necessary to implement this program shall be the responsibility of the applicant. 22. The applicant shall delete all references to the Regional Biological Enhancement Area that are presently shown on the Tentative Map. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS: 23. Necessary mitigation measures acceptable to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife and/or the California Department of Fish and Game shall be implemented prior to issuance of grading permits to reduce the impact of the project on K-Rats-to a level of insignificance. If mitigation measures are unavailable, grading permits shall not be R:\S\STAFFRPT~28941 .CC ' 5117/93 klb 24. issued. A new K-Rat study may be required if deemed necessary by the Planning Director. 'A qualified paleontologist shall be retained by the developer for consultation'and comment on the proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological impacts. Should the paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to significant resources, a pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist and the excavation and grading contractor shall be arranged. When necessary, the paleontologist or representative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils. 25.' An overall conceptual landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval prior to issuance of any grading permits. This plan shall highlight all the areas which will be landscaped including slopes within individual lots, common area slopes/open space, street trees, medians, tall tree planting for birds of prey within the 100-year flood plain, etc. Construction landscape plans for each phase shall be submitted for approval to the Planning Department prior to issuance of any building permits for that phase. All common area landscaping for each phase shall be installed prior to issuance of the final for any house in that phase. All private parks within each individual phase shall be developed prior to issuance of the final for the first house on that phase. All graded slopes over three feet in height shall be landscaped and irrigated according to the City Development Code. (amended by the Planning Commission January 4, 1993) 26. An overall fencing plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval prior to issuance of any grading permits which shall contain the following: A block, wrought iron, or a combination block and wrought iron wall shall be constructed along the westerly boundary of the project unless it has been previously constructed. For the easterly portion of the project that runs along the City boundary, the developer shall provide a block or wrought iron wall. At the applicants discretion, other materials, as approved by the Planning Director, can be provided along the property line. For the northerly area that borders the park site and the southerly area that borders the school and park site the developer shall provide a block, wrought iron, or a combination block and wrought iron wall. The placement of rear or side yard fencing on each individual lot is optional and is to be at the discretion of each individual home owner. If there is to be rear or side yard fencing, materials are to be approved by the Planning Director. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 27. 28. Individual homes on individual lots shall require Planning Department approval. A detailed landscaping and irrigation plan, prepared by a licensed landscape architect, shall be submitted to the City Planning Department for review and approval prior to · issuance of building permits. R:\S\STAFFRPT~26941 .CC 5/17/93 klb 29. No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residential lot/unit within the project boundary until the developer or its successor's-in-interest provides evidence of compliance with public facility financing measures. A cash sum of one-hundred dollars ($100) per lot/unit shall be deposited with the City as mitigation for public library development. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS: 30. All landscaping and irrigation within each individual lot shall be installed in accordance with approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permit for that lot. If seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director and the Director of Building and Safety. 31. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans and shall be verified by City field inspection. 32. All landscaping and irrigation outside individual lots shall be completed prior to issuance of the first occupancy permit. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS: The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true' meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of Public Works. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map or site plan all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: 33. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all onsite flat work and improvements) construction shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right- of-way. 34. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 35. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. R:\S~STAFFI~T~26941 .CC 5117/93 klb 36. PRIOR 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section. TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS: The final grading plan shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. All pad drainage shall be directed to appropriate drainage swales or devices. No concentrated drainage shall be conveyed over slopes except within concrete brow ditches or other approved drainage devices. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: · · · · · San Diego Regional Water Quality; Riverside County Flood Control District; Planning Department; Department of Public Works; and U. S. Army Corps of Engineers; A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. An erosion control plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weedfree condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Department of Public Works. A permit from the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers is required prior to pulling any permits for construction, as outlined in the Department of the Army letter, dated December 4, 1991. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits, If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has been already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. R:\S~STAFFRPl'%26941 .CC 5/17/93 Idb 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. The developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or easements for any offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. A hydrology/hydraulic study shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The drainage study shall include, but not be limited to, the following criteria: Drainage and flood protection facilities which will protect all structures by diverting site runoff to streets or approved storm drain facilities as directed by the Department of Public Works. Adequate provision shall be made for the acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. The impact to the site from any flood zone as shown on the FEMA flood hazard map and any necessary mitigation to protect the site. D. Identify and mitigate impacts of grading to any adjacent floodway. The location of existing and post development 100-year floodplain and floodway shall be shown on the improvement plan. Minimum flowline grade in earthen swales shall be 1.0% unless otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works. The subdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate facilities as approved by the Department of Public Works. Concrete lined drainage swales with energy dissipators will be required to protect all slopes and structures. Runoff to streets or to storm drains shall be kept substantially free of all rocks and debris. The subdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall 'be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing facilities. A drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners for the release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy of the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review prior to recordation. The location of the recorded easement shall be delineated on the grading plan. R:~S\STAFFRPT~28941 .CC 5117/93 Idb 52. PRIOR 53. 54. 55. Prior to issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained by the developer for consultation and comment on the proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological impacts. Should the paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to significant resources, a pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist and the excavation and grading contractor shall be arranged. When necessary, the paleontologist or representative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils. TO THE ISSUANCE OF ENCROACHMENT PERMITS: All necessary grading permit requirements shall have been submitted/accomplished to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. Improvement plans, including but not limited to, streets, utilities, street lights, driveways and drainage facilities shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer on 24" x 36" mylar sheets and approved by the Department of Public Works. Final plans (and profiles for improvements within public right of way) shall show the location of existing utility facilities and easements as directed by the Department of Public Works. The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans to be submitted to the Department of Public Works: Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula standards 207 and 401 (curb and sidewalk). Street lights shall be installed along Via Del Monte, Cee Cee Lane and Castell Way adjoining the site in accordance with Ordinance 461 and shall be shown on the improvement plans as directed by the Department of Public Works. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City standard 400 and 401. Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries or as otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works. Minimum centerline radii shall be in accordance with City standard 113 or as otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works. Private driveways from street to residence shall be a minimum width of 16 feet of A,C. Paving or P.C.C. Concrete. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as approved by the Department of Public Works. All fire truck turnarounds shall be fully paved with material consistent with the driveway improvements. R:\S\STAFFRPT~26941 .Ci:: 5/17/93 klb Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. A minimum of 150 feet of tr.-ffS; vehicle stacking area shall be provided between the access control box of any gated entry and the Hght of way of intersecting public streets. A Turnaround with a minimum 38-foot radius shall be provided before the gated entry. {amended by Public Works staff February 1, 1993) All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through undersidewalk drains. 56. The minimum centerline grade for streets shall be 0.50 percent or as otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works. 57. Improvement plans per City Standards for the private streets shall be required for · review and approval by the Department of Public Works. 58. All driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula standards and shall be shown on the street improvement plans. 59. All driveways shall be located a minimum of two (2) feet from the side property line. 60. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence. 61. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground. 62. All conditions of the grading permit and encroachment permit shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department. 63. A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer for any lane closure and detour or other disruption 'to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF FINAL MAP: 64. The developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. Street improvements, which may include, but are not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, and other traffic control devices as appropriate. B. Storm drain facilities C. Landscaping (slopes and parkways). R:\S~STAFFRPT~26941 .CC 5/17/93 klb 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. D. Erosion control and slope protection. E. Sewer and domestic water systems. F. All trails, as required by the City's Master Plans. G. Undergrounding of proposed utility distribution lines. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho California Water District; Eastern Municipal Water District; Riverside County Flood Control District; City of Temecula Fire Bureau; Planning Department; Department of Public Works; Riverside County Health Department; CATV Franchise; Parks and Recreation Department; General .Telephone; Southern California Edison Company; Southern California Gas Company; and U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Legal all-weather primary and secondary access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract map boundary to a paved City maintained road. (amended by Public Works staff February 1, 1993| All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. Cee Cee Lane from Orlinda Drive to Lisa Road and Via Del Monte shall be improved with 20 feet of asphalt concrete pavement plus one 12-foot lane, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated right-of-way in accordance with City Standard No. 104, Section A (60'/40'). Castell Way shall be improved with 22 feet of asphalt concrete pavement plus one 12- foot lane, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated right-of-way in accordance with City Standard No. 103, Section A (66'/44'). A cul-de- sac shall be provided at the terminus per City Standards. (Amended by Planning Commission February 1, 1993) All interior private streets shall be improved with 40 feet of asphalt concrete pavement, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated easements in accordance with Ordinance 460 and City Standard No. 104, Section A (60'/40'). Sidewalks shall be constructed on a minimum of one side of the street as directed by the Department of Public Works. R:~S\STAFFRPT~26941 .CC 5/17/93 Idb 71. McMahon Drive shall be fully. improved with 44 feet of asphalt. concrete pavement from the tract boundary to Crowne Hill Drive, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated right-of-way in accordance with City Standard 'No. 103, Section A (66'/44').. 72. Castell Way shall be 'improved with a minimum of 32 feet of asphalt concrete pavement from the tract boundary to Crowne Hill Drive, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within a 60-foot minimum right-of-way in accordance with City Standard No. 106, Section B (60'/32'). 73. in the event that Crowne Hill Drive is not constructed by Assessment District No. 159 prior to the final map recordation, the developer shall construct or bond for the improvements to provide for a minimum of 32' of street improvements within a 60- foot right-of-way per City Standard No. 106, Section B (60'/32'). The improvements shall be constructed prior to the first occupancy. (amended by the Planning Commission January 4, 1993) 74. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the developer shall, prior to submittal of the' final map for recordation, .enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to the'Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at the developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. 75. A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works for Castell Way and shall be included in the street improvement plans. 76. Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering for the design requirements. 77. A 60 foot easement shall be dedicated for public utilities and emergency vehicle access for all private streets. 78. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805. 79. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated and noted on the final map. 80. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated where sidewalks meander through private property. 81. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within R:~S~STAFFRPT~26941 .CC 5/17/93 klb drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating "drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions." 82. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The following information shall be on the ECS: A. The delineation of the area within the 100 - year floodplain. B. Special Study Zones. "This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy." 83. The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 84. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Department of Public Works a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. 85. Prior to recording the final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street improvements. PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT: 86. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 87. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. 88. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to developer. Concurrently, With executing this Agreement, R:\S\STAFFRPT~26941 .CC 5/1 7193 klb developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed $10,000. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees).: By execution of this Agreement, developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; orovided that developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof. PRIOR 89. TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY: All improvements shall be completed and in place per the approved plans, including but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, drainage facilities, parkway trees and street lights on all public streets. .. 90. 91. All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and striping plan. The subdivider shall provide "stop" controls at the intersection of local streets with arterial streets as directed by the Department of Public Works. 92. Landscaping shall be installed in place in the corner cut-off area of all intersection and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance as directed by the Department of Public Works. OTHER AGENCIES: 93. The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal dated October 31, 1991, a copy of which is attached. 94. The applicant shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated February 22, 1988, a copy of which is attached. If the project lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of City of Temecula Land Division Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the City prior to issuance of Occupancy Permits. 95. The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County of Riverside Fire Department's letter dated August 31 1992, a copy of which is attached. ' 96. 97. 98. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho California Water District transmittal dated October 31, 1991, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Army Corps of Engineers transmittal dated December 2, 1991, a copy of which is attached. Applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Temecula Valley Unified School District transmittal dated December 3, 1992. R:~S~STAFFRPT~26941 .CC 5/17/93 Idb TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 99. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the applicant or his assignee shall pay the fair market value of .36 acres of parkland to comply with City Ordinance No. 460.93 (Quimby). The amount to be paid shall be determined by TCSD staff within thirty (30) days prior to the recordation of said map. 100. Exterior slopes (as defined as: Those slopes contiguous to residential streets that have a width of 66' or greater), shall be offered for dedication to the City of Temecula for maintenance purposes following compliance to TCSD standards and completion of the 'application process. All other slopes and open space shall be maintained by an established Home Owners' Association (HOA). 101. All proposed slopes and open space intended for dedication to the City of Temecula shall be identified on the Final Map by numbered lot, with the square footage of said lot number indexed as proposed City Maintenance area. 102. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the subdivider shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be executed, guaranteeing the construction of all proposed TCSD landscape maintenance areas. Landscape construction drawings for project areas identified as TCSD maintenance areas shall be reviewed and approved by TCSD staff. 103. Construction of proposed TCSD landscape maintenance areas shall commence pursuant to a pre-job meeting with the developer and City Maintenance Superintendent. Failure to comply with the TCSD review process will preclude acceptance of these areas into the TCSD maintenance program. 104. It shall be the developer's or assignee's responsibility to disclose the existence of the Temecula Community Services District and its service level assessments to all prospective purchasers. This disclosure shall be in the form acceptable to the TCSD and made available to Staff for their review, as set forth acceptable to the TCSD and made available to staff for their review, as set forth in Section 2795.1 of the regulations of the Reap Estate Commissioner. 105. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the developer shall submit the current list of Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN) to the assigned tract. R:\S\STAFFRPT~26941 .CC 5/1 7193 Idb ATTACHMENT NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL RESOLUTION 93- R:~S~STAFFRPT~26941 .CC 5/17~93 Idb RESOLUTION NO. 93-01 A RESOLI.rrION OF TFtF. PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~:nr. CITY OF TEMECLTLA RECOM1VB~.N'I)ING APPROVAL OF CttANGE OF ZONE NO. 22 TO CItANGE ~ ZONING FROM R-A-S TO R-A-2',~ FOR PORTIONS OF LOTS 8, 9, 11,/.3, 17, 18, 26, 27 ~ 28 AND FROM R-A-2~h TO R-A- 5 FOR A PORTION OF LOT 4 FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 26941, AND TO RECOIVIM~-NI) APPROVAL OF VESTING TENTA~ TRACT MAP NO. 26941 TO SUBDIVIDE A 133 ACRE PARCEL INTO 28 CUSTOM SINGLE FAM'rr.Y LOTS LOCAT'g~D SOLrill OF PAUBA ROAD, NORTIt OF DE PORTOLA ROAD, EAST OF VIA NORTE AND WEST OF B~I.D STAGE ROAD. ~R:YEREAS, Taylor Woodrow Homes fried Change of Zone No. 22 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WI:rF, REAS, said applications were processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHF. aEAS, the Planning Commission considered said applications on January 4, 1993 and February 1, 1993, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended approval of said applications; NOW, Tlt'F. REFORE, TItF. PLANNING COMMISSION OF TI:IF. CITY OF TE~IECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETER_MINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: general plan. The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the 2. The planning agency f'mds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: R:~S\STAFFRPT'~26941,PC 2/2193 klb a. ..There is a reasonable pwbability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable. time. b. There is little or no pwbability of substantial detriment w or interference with the future adopted general plan if the pwpoSed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state hw and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan g~idelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of said applications makes the following findings, to wit: Change of Zone No. 22 1. There is a reasonable probability that Change of Zone No. 22 will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State Law, due to the fact that the density of the project, .21 dwelling units/acre, is consistent with the Very Low Density Residential Land Use designation of the future General Plan. Furthermore, the proposed R-A-21/2 and R-A-5 zones will be consistent with the Very Low Density Residential Zoning District. 2. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference, with the future General Plan ff Change of Zone No. 22 is ultimately inconsistent with the Plan, due to the fact that the project is consistent with the existing large lot Custom single family dwelling developments in the immediate vicinity and their underlying zones. 3. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses since the proposed large lot custom single family dwellings are consistent with the existing large lot custom single family dwellings and the vacant land surrounding the project'. 4. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on the environment since mitigation measures of Environmental Impact Report No. 230 and the Addendure to Environmental Impact Report No. 230 have been incorporated to the project design and Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Map 26941 to reduce the impacts to a level of insignificance. R:~S~$TAFFRPT~26941.PC 212193 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 1. There is a reasonable probability that Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State Law. The project, as conditioned, conforms with existing applicable city zoning ordinances and development standards. Furthermore, the proposed density of the project, .21 dwelling units per acre, is consistent with the future General Plan Land Use Designation of Very Low Density Residential. 2. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with the City's future General Plan, ff the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the Plan, since the surrounding land uses are large lot custom single family dwellings and vacant land. 3. The proposed use or action as conditioned complies with State planning 'and zoning laws, local Ordinance Nos. 348 and 460; and California Governmental Code Sections 65000-66009 (Planning and Zoning l-aw). 4. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or welfare. since all impacts have been mitigated to a level of insignificance, 5. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses since the proposed large lot custom single family dwellings are consistent with the existing large lot custom single family dwellings and the vacant land surrounding the project. 6. The project as designed and conditioned wilt not adversely affect the built or natural environment as determined in Environmental Impact Report No. 230 and the Addendum for this project. 7. Said Findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference, due to the fact that they are referenced in the attached Staff Report, Exhibits, Environmental Impact Report, and Conditions of Approval. 8. The Planning Commission has considered the effect of its action upon the housing needs of the region and has balanced these needs against the public service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environmental resources (Gov. Code Section 66412.3) and finds that the project density is consistent with SWAP and the future General Plan. Additionally, it will provide more diversity in the housing type available to the residents of the City of Temecula. 9. The proposed project will not result in discharge of waste into the existing sewer system that is in violation of the requirements as set out in Section 13000 et seq. of the California Water Code by requiring the project to comply with Eastern Municipal Water District' s requirements. R:~S\STAFFRPT\26941.PC 2/2/93 klb 10. The design. of the subdivision provides to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision (Gov. Code Section 66473.1) by limiting the height of the futur~ structures to 32 fe~t and requiring setbacks according to the Resi~ntial Agriculture ('R-A) standards. 11. The pwject has acceptable access by means of dedicated right-of-way and has been conditioned to have secondary access from Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23143, Amendment No. 5 for the necessary fight-of-way for secondary access. 12. The project will not have a si~xificant adverse affect on the environment. The County of Riverside Board of Supe:rvisors certified' ElR No. 230 in conjunction with the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23143 Amended No. 3 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22430. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 and Change of Zone No. 22 will not result in any new or substanti~ally increasext environmental impacts. · F. As condifioned pursuant to Section 3, the Vesting Tract Map proposed is compatible with the health, safety and welfar~ of the community. Section 2. Environmental Compliance. An Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 230 was prepared for this project indicates that the proposed project will not have a si~cant impact on the environment with the incorporation of the mitigation measures into the project design. Section 3. Conditions. The City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of Change of Zone No. 22 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941, to subdivide a 133 acre parcel into 28 large lot custom single family lots located south of Pauba Road, north of De Portola Road, east of Via Norte and west of Butterfield Stage Road subject to the following conditions: A. Attachment No. '2, attached hereto. Section 4. PASSRI'}, APPROVED AND ADO ~~ Febru 1993. ,~ R:\SxSTAFFRPT%26941.PC 212193 klb I R'I~.REBY CERTI]~ that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 1st day of February, 1993 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: 4 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: CHINIA~, FAHEY, FOP, D, HOAGLAND NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSEbrr: 1 PLANNING COM2vfISSIONEES: BLAIE / Y THORNI-m SECRETARY 1 O R:\S%STAFFRPT%26941 .PC 2/2/93 klb ATTACHMENT NO. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 5, 1993 AND FEBRUARY 1, 1993 R:\S\STAFFRP'I'%26941 .CC 5/1 7193 klb PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 4, 1993 AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Ford, Hoagland, Fahey NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAIN: I . COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff Commissioner Blair arrived at 6:10 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING 3. Vestina Tentative Tract MaD No. 26941. Chanqe of Zone No. 22 Planner Craig Ruiz presented the staff report. Craig advised of the following changes to the Conditions of Approval: #4 - Delete #10 Include wording that will requi~e trees to be minimum 24" box in size. Chairman Fahey opened the public hearing at 6:20 P.M. Ernie Egger, IPC, 27447 Enterprise Circle West, Temecula, representing the applicant, concurred with the staff report and modifications to the Conditions of Approval. Commissioner Hoagland suggested that cattle not be allowed at the equestrian style lots. He also expressed concern regarding the transition from the smaller lots to the larger equestrian estates. ChaIrman Fahey expressed concern regarding the proposed grading and the developers ability to maintain the ~olling hills aspect of the area. John Wayland, 33342 Pauba Road, Temecula, representing the Pauba Ranchos (aka Country Roads) Association, advised that he had received his first notification of the laroiect on December 27, 1992 and requested additional time to review concerns regarding the densities, access to the project on streets currently maintained by the property owners, liability relating to equestrian trails, and the private landing strip which is currently in the location of the proposed project. Fred Hammersly, 41999 Via Del Monte, Temecula, questioned the proposed lighting for the project. Ernie Egger stated that the project developer is very sensitive to the desires of the surrounding property owners to retain the "night lighting" they currently enjoy. Mr. Egger added that the project has been designed with substantial equestrian trails. PCMI~l/04/93 - 2- i/20/93 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 4.1993 Joanne Gebhardt, 48282 Via Del Monte, Temecula, asked that communications be open between City staff, the developer and the Homeowners Association. · Commissioner Chiniaeff stated that he was unclear as to why the request-was being presented and preferred to review the whole map prior to making any modifications. Commissioner Ford recommended modifying Condition 11-F, regarding Lot 8 and Lot 9, to read ".~.after constructed or obstructed"; and Condition 67 regarding Crown Hill Drive, should read "if Crown Hill DriVe is not constructed and accepted ...... shall be constructed and accepted prior to the first occupancy". Commissioner Hoagland stated he felt that private roads in this type of development are inappropriate. Gary Thornhill suggested that the Conditions of Approval be amended to require a navigation easement to be placed on the property and a White Report be provided to potential property owners. It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Chiniaeff to close the public hearing at 7:05 P.M. and continue Change of Zone No. 22, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 off calendar to allow the applicant the opportunity to address the following concerns expressed by the Commission: the E.I.R. suggesting the planting of .tall'trees to provide nesting, the need for conditions pertaining to the navigation easement, concerns regarding lots created by 'the cribwalls around the lots, maintenance of the open space areas, traffic control if the through road is maintained as a private road, buffering between the project and higher density residences, grading, as well as direction that the applicant meet with the surrounding property owners to address their Concerns. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland, Fa~ey NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None PCMIN 1/O4193 General Plan Consicleration of Environmental Impact Report. John Meyer presented the staff report. Chairman Fahey opened the public hearing at 7:15-P.M. Eric Brown, 45673 Clubhouse Dri.ve, Temecula, representing the Rainbow Canyon Homeowners Association, presented the Commission with a letter commending them -3- 1 ~20~93 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Blair FEBRUARY 1, 1993 e Off-Site Subdivision Sic~ns (Kiosk) Senior Planner Debbie Ubnoske presented the staff report. Assistant City Attorney John Cavanaugh explained the ordinance. Commissioner'Hoagland stated that he feels it is the Council's intent to have Ordinance 91-40 (Kiosk Sign Ordinance) regulate off-site subdivision signs. Assistant City Attorney John Cavanaugh stated that Ordinance 91-40 was prepared with the intent to occupy the whole of the field in advertising and regulations. He further stated that Ordinance 91-40 does prempt Section 19.6b of Ordinance 348.] Chairman Fahey stated that she feels it is the Commission's intent that the Kiosk Ordinance replace off-site signs. The overall consensus of the Commission was to make no changes to the approval process for off-site subdivision signs. _ PUBLIC HEARING Vestinq Tentative Tract MaD No. 26941, Chancle of Zone No. 22 and the Addendum to Environmental Imoact Reoort No. 230 PLanner Craig Ruiz presented the staff report. Chairman Fahey opened the public hearing at 6:20 P.M." Ernie Egger, TPC, 27447 Enterprise Circle West, Temecula, representing the applicant, Taylor Woodrow Homes, stated the re-design efforts of Lot 6 through Lot 9 resulted in standard shaped and sized lots and a reduction in both grading and the grade of driveways. John Wayland, 33342 Pauba Road, Temecula, representing the Pauba Ranchos Property Owners Association, presented the Commission with the following list and concerns regarding the Crowne Hill Project: amount of traffic and maintenance issues relative to roads in the area, provision of equestrian trails, parking for the park site, street lighting, General Plan consistency, buffer treatment, above ground utilities, and possible impact on property values. Chairman Fahey advised that a number of the issues raised by Mr. Wayland cannot be addressed by the Commission because they do not relate to Tract Map No. 26941. """ PCMIN02/O 1/93 -2- 2/15193 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 1, 1993 Harry Clark, 31010 Avenida Buena Suerte, Temecula, aovised the Commission that the engineer for the project has stated that Cee Cee Lane is not necessary to the project. Mr. Clark asked the Commission to consider this statement. Ernie Egger, responded that Crowne Hill Drive will carry a substantial amount of traffic to Pauba, however, Tract Map 231.43 is conditioned 'to provide frontage improvements to Pauba Road and a traffic signal at Pauba Road and Crowne Hill Drive. Addressing the issue of traffic traveling east through the project, Mr. Egger stated that there is no need for traffic to travel east. Regarding Cee Cee Lane, Mr. Egger stated that this road is not necessary to the project and the developer would have no problem deleting that link. He added that an equestrian trail is shown along Cee Cee Lane, however, the wash area is open and can be used by equestrians. Mr. Egger advised that no designs have been developed for the park but it is anticipated that the park site will provide ample parking. Mr. Egger stated that the developer is willing to provide the minimum street lighting on public roads and no street lights on the private roads and the developer would agree to a condition requiring construction equipment to access the site from the west through the Taylor Woodrow Tract. Commissioner Hoagland asked staff to address the road issues. Ray Casey stated that the City has had some discussions with the Assessment District who did the construction of Pauba Road about doing the half-width 7~lus one lane improvements, and if that is done, the City will consider accepting Pauba Road for maintenance. Ray Casey added that the same could be done with Via Del Monte and Cee Cee Lane once the improvements that are conditioned by the map are complete. Mr. Ray Casey indicated that an agreement with the County of Riverside must be completed, prior to acceptance by the City for maintenance. Commissioner Chiniaeff. questioned if staff would agree to ending Cee Cee Lane at Gastell. creating a cul-de-sac. Assistant City Attorney John Cavanaugh suggested that the Fire Department be consulted about their concerns regarding closing off Cee Cee Lane. Chairman Fahey expressed concern that there are no equestrian trails provided by this developer except for those along the flood plain. Commissioner Chiniaeff suggested that an equestrian easement be created along the five acre lots in the buffer area and maintained by the Homeowners Association. Commissioner Chiniaeff suggested Lots 7, 8 and 9 be combined, and two lots be created split by the existing drainage course, providing minimum five acre lots adjacent to Pauba Ranchos and creating a buffer area. Commissioner Hoagland stated that he feels the City should make a commitment to take over the maintenance and liability of Pauba Road. PCMIN02/01/93 -3- 2115~93 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 1, 1993 Ernie Egger stated that the developer would agree to all the conditions except creating two lots out of Lots 7, 8 and 9. Adrian Folley, Project Manager,. Taylor Woodrow Homes, gave an overview of the project from acquisition and asked the Commission to reconsider their request to combine the three lots. Commissioner Chiniaeff stated that he feels the drainage course is a natural break with the intention of creating a buffer back to the Pauba Ranchos properties. Commissioner Chiniaeff stated that there are pads on the sides of slopes that probably shouldn't be there. It was moved by Commissioner Chiniaeff, seconded by Commissioner Hoagland to · recommend Adoption of Resolution No. PC 93-01 recommending Approval of Change of Zone No. 22, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 and the Addendure to the Environmental Impact Report No. 230, based on the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report; and subject to the Conditions of Approval amended as follows: 1. maintenance dedication of Pauba Road; 2. Cee Cee Lane and Gastell, create a cul-de- sac or end at the park site, provided it has adequate access and circulation based on Fire Department requirements; 3. maintain five acre lots as the transition lots to the county line (adjacent to Pauba Ranchos); 4. condition the developer to create equestrian trails along the five acre lots in the buffer area, to be maintained by the Crown Hills Homeowners Association; and, 5. combine Lots 7, 8 and 9 creating two lots split by the drainage course. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey, NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Blair PLANNING DIRECTORS REPORT None PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT None PCMIN02/01/93 -4- 211 5~93 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: DATE: Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning February 1, 1993 SUBJECT: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941, Change of Zone No. 22 and Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 230. RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMEND Adoption of Resolution No. 93- recommending Approval of Change of Zone No. 22, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 and the Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 230, based on the Analysis and Findings' contained in the Staff Report; and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. BACKGROUND Vesti.ng Tentative Tract Map No. 26941, Crowne Hill Estates, is a proposal to subdivide 133 acres into 28 custom single family lots. Change of Zone No. 22 is a request to change from Residential Agriculture, 5 acre minimum lot size (R-A-5) to Residential Agriculture, 2.5 acre mfnimum lot size (R-A-2~) for lots 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 17, 18, 26, 27, and 28 and from R-A-2~ to R-A-5 for a portion of lot 4. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941, Change'of Zone No. 22 and Addendure to Environmental Impact Report No. 230 were heard at the January 4, 1993 Planning Commission meeting. The Commission directed staff to address several issues in regards to the above referenced projects. The following issues were raised by the Commission: street maintenance, access, private streets,. gated entry, street lighting, buffer/transition area, maintenance of open space, grading, proximity of private airstrip, steep driveways, number of lots, lot configuration, nesting areas and public notice. SubseQuent to the Planning Commission meeting staff met with the applicant to address the above mentioned items. The following table lists each item, how it was addressed and the aDphcable condition numbers. 1 R:~"~'rAFFRFT~6841-PC 1126/93 Idb PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE:' Residential Agriculture, 2.5 acre minimum lot size (R-A-2 ½ ) and Residential Agriculture, 5 acre minimum lot size {R-A-5) Vacant SURROUNDING LAND. USES: PROJECT STATISTICS North: South: East: West: Vacant and Custom One Family Dwellings Vacant Vacant and Custom One Family Dwellings Vacant Number of lots 28 Total Area 133.00 " acres Average parcel size 4.75 acres Minimum lot size 2.50 acres Gross density 0.21 dwelling units per acre ExcaVation 198,800 cubic yards Import 1,200 cubic yards BACKGROUND Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 is a remapping of previously approved yet never recorded map. The Previously approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23143, along with EIR No. 230, Development Agreement No. 26 and Design Guidelines were approved by the RiversIde County Board of Supervisors in August of 1988. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The apphcant ~s requesting approval to subdivide 133 acres into 28 custom single family lots. The lots will vary in size from 2.5 acres tO 10.6 acres. The project is zoned R-A-5 and R-A- 2~/2. Develol~ment Agreement No. 26 and the Design Guidelines that were previously approved w~th Vesting Tentative 'Tract Map No. 23143 apply to Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941. The I~rojec~ sIte lies within two .zoning districts, R-A-5 and R-A-2 ~. The request for zone change will change the zoning to conform with the design of the project. A portion of lots 8, 9, 12, 13.17, 18, 26, 27 and 28 will change from R-A-5 to R-A-2 ~ and a portion of lot 4 will change from R-A-2 ~ tO R-A-5. The eastern portion of the property is currently located within the 100-year flood plain and comlDnses al~Droximately 9.5 acres. The 1 O0 year flood plain runs through lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 10. The proiect has been conditioned to ensure that this portion of the property will be properly IDreserved as open space and no structures will be allowed (refer to Conditions No. 11 and 16). o o · R:~Sl, STAFFRPT126941VTM.pC 12/30/92 kib Issue 8) Grading 9) Proximity of Airstrip 1 O) Steep Driveways I 1 ) Lot Configuration 12) Nesting for BIrds of Prey 13) Public Notice Question How much grading is proposed? Will the project require an avigation easement? What is the distance from the airstrip? The driveways appear to be excessively steep. The flag lot configuration of lots 8 and 9 may create impacts relative to the cribwall that abuts the 100-year floodplain and excessive grading. The EIR requires tree planting but this was not included in the conditions of approval. Some members of the public felt that the notice was confusing. Resolution & Applicable Condition(s) Lots 11-28 will involve grading. of approximately 38 % of the lot area, and lots 1-10 will involve grading of approximately 15% of the lot area. (Condition9 and applicant's Exhibit No. 3) The developer will be required to disclose the proximity of the airstrip in the "White' report which is filed with California Department of Real Estate. The developer will .be required to grant an avigation easement to the airstrip. (Conditions 14 & 15 and applicant's Exhibit No. 5) Ordinance 460 allows for driveways to have a maximum of 15% slope. The steepest proposed driveway is 13% for lots 15 and 28. (Condition 57) The applicant has modified lots 7, 8 and 9. The reconfiguration reduces the grading and 100-year floodplain impacts but results in increasing the area of the zone change. (applicant's Exhibit No.4) Trees will be required to be planted within the 100-year floodplain. (Condition No. 24) Staff has re-noticed the item. It ~s sta.ff's opinion that the re-design of the map and associated zone change mitigates concerns relative to the "flag lot" condition as it relates to lots 8 and 9 which was a concern of the Planning Commission. It is further staff's feeling that the additional information provided subsequent to the January 4, 1992 Planning Commission meeting adequately addresses the Commission's concerns relative to the issues raised at the meeting. 3 R:~S~"rAF~6~41.pC 1126/~3 Idb ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION An Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 230 was prepared by Staff and no additional significant impacts were identified as a result of the filing of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No, 26941, Environmental Impact Report No, 230 included analysis of the area that comprises Vesting Tentative Tract Map No, 26941 along with Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23143. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No, 26941 has not been changed significantly or altered the environmental impacts that were examined in Environmental Impact Report No. 230, The mitigation measures contained in the Conditions of Approval will be implemented in order to mitigate the impacts of the development, S UMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The proposed project meets the requirements of Ordinance 348, Ordinance 460 and the City's future General Plan. Conditions placed upon the project will insure that future development will not have excessive grading and will blend with the hillside topography. FINDINGS Change of Zone No. 22 There is a reasonable probability that Change of Zone No, 22 will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State Law, due to the fact that the density of the project, .21 dwelling units/acre, is consistent with the Very Low Density Residential Land Use designation of the future General Plan. Furthermore, the proposed R-A-2 ½ and R-A-5 zones will be consistent with the Very Low Density Residential Zoning District. There ~s not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference, with the future General Plan if Change of Zone No. 22 is ultimately inconsistent with the Plan, due to the fact that the project is consistent with the existing large lot custom single family dv~elling developments in the immediate vicinity and their underlying zones. The proiect is compatible with surrounding land uses since this project is a single family dwelling development and the surrounding land uses are single family dwellings, a golf course and vacant land. 4. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on the environment since mitigation measures of Environmental Impact Report No. 230 and the Addendure to Enwronmental Impact Report No. 230 have been incorporated to the project design and Condmons of Approval to reduce the impacts to a level of insignificance. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 '- There is a reasonable probability that Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable t~me and in accordance with State Law. The project, as conditioned, conforms with existing applicable city zoning ordinances and development standards. Furthermore, the proposed density of the project, .21 dwelling units per acre, is consistent with the future General Plan Land Use Designation of Very Low Density Residential. · , R:~lkSTAFFIqPT~eI41V'TM.pC 12/30/92 Idb ATTACHMENT NO. 1 AMENDED RESOLUTION NO. 93° 5 R:~S~"rAFFFFT',28941.pC 1/26/93 klb 5. 7. 12. The project will not have .a significant adverse affect on the environment. The County of Riverside Board of Supervisors. certified EIR No. 230 in conjunction with the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23143 Amended No. 3 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22430. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 and Change of Zone No. 22 will not result in any new or substantially increased environmental impacts. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Attachments: RECOMMEND Adoption of Resolution No. 93- recommending Approval of Change of Zone No. 22, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 and the Addendure to Environmental Impact Report No. 230, based on the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report; and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. Resolution No. 93- - blue page 7 'Conditions of Approval - blue page 12 Exhibits - blue page 27 A. Vicinity Map B. SWAP C. Zoning D. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 E. Zone Change No. 22 F. Tentative Tract Map 23143 Environmental Impact Report No. 230 - blue page 35 Addendure to Environmental Imloact Report No. 230 - blue page 36 Devetol~ment Agreement No. 26 - blue page 38 Design Guidelines - blue page 39 R:~'~STAFFRFT~6941VTM.pC 12/30/92 idb RESOLUTION NO. A RE~OLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CTrY OF .~ RECO~ING APPROVAL OF CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 22 TO CHANGE Tn'w. ZONING FROM R-A-$ TO R-A-2~ FOR FORTIONS OF LOTS 8, 9, 12., 13, 17, 18, 2,6, 27 AND 28 AND FROM R-A-2~ TO R-A- S FOR A FORTION OF LOT 4 FOR VE$TING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 26941, NO. AND TO RECO~ APPROVAL OF VF~TING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 26941 TO SUBDIVIDE A L3~ ACRE FARpC~1~ ;A~0TO 28 CUSTOM SINGLF~ FA1Vm~y LOTS LOCATED SOUTH WHI~,EAS, Taylor Woodrow Homes filed Change of Zone No. 22 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 in accordance with the Riverside COunty Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WH'F-REAS, said applications were processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local hw; WI~.REAS, the Planning Commission considered said applications on January 4, 1993 and February 1, 1993, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended approval of said applications; NOW, TFI'E-REFO RE, ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMEC~A DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1~ Findings. That the Temecuh Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation.. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state hw that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: general plan. The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the 2. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: R:'~'"~-STAFFRPT'I.2el4.1 .PC: 1/26/13 kib Vesting Tentative Trm Map No. 26941 1. There is a reasonable probability that Vesting Tentative Tract · No. CO!IIp],~P'li.'· t. · , , conforms with existing applicable city zoninS ordi~nces and development standards. Furthermore, the proposed density of the project, .21 dwening units per acre, is consistent with the future Oene Plan I. and Use Design,don of Very Low Density R~sidential. 2. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with the City's future C~i~eral Plan, if the proposed use 'is ultimateJy inconsistent with the Plan, since the surrounding land uses are large lot custom single family dwellings and vacant land. 3. The proposed use or action as conditioned complies with State planning and zoning laws, local Ordinance Nos. 348 and 460; and California GOvernmental Code Sections 65000-66009 (Planning and Zoning Law). 4. The project as designed and conditioned wffi not adversely affect the public h~lth or weftare since all impacts have be~n mitigated to a level of insignificance. 5. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses since the proposed large lot custom single family dwellings are consistent with the existing large lot custom single family dwellings and the vacant land surrounding the project. 6. The project as designed and condi~oned wffi not adversely affect the built or natural environment as determined in Environmental Impact Report No. 230 and the Addendure for this project. 7. Said Findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference, due to the fact that they are referenced in the attached Staff Report, Exhibits, Environmental Impact Report, and Conditions of Approval. 8. The Planning Commission has considered the effect of its action upon the housing needs of the region and has balanced these needs against the public service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environmental resources (Gov. Code Section 66412.3) and finds that the project density is consistent with SWAP and the future General Plan. Additionally, it will provide more diversity in the housing type available to the residents of the City of Temecula. 9. The proposed project will not result in discharge of waste imo the existing sewer system that is in violation of the requirements as set out in Section 13000 et seq. of the · California Water Code by requiring the project to comply with Eastern Municipal Water District's requirements. 8 R:~S~qTAFI:Nrr~e141.PC· 1128/93 b. There is liale or no probability of subsulatial deu'iment to or interference with the future adopted general plan ff the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state hw and local OrdinanCeS. B. The Rivehide County General Plan, as mended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, Cnereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecuh as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidetines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The Planning Commission in recommending appwvaJ of said applications makes the following findings, to wit: Change of Zone No. 22 1. There is a reasonable pwbability that Change of Zone No. 22 will be consistent with the City 's future General plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State Law, due to the fact that the density of the project, .21 dwelling units/acre, is consistent with the Very Low Density Residential Land Use designation of the future General Plan. Furthermore, the proposed R-A-2% and R-A-5 zones will be consistent with the Very Low Density Residential Zoning District. 2. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference, with the future General Plan if Change of Zone No. 22 is ultimately inconsistent with the Plan, due to the fact that the project is consistent with the existing large lot custom single family dwelling developments in the immediate vicinity and their underlying zones. 3. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses since the proposed large lot custom single family dwellings are consistent with the existing large lot custom single family dwetlmgs and the vacant land surrounding the project. 4. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on the envh'onment since mitigation measures of Environmental Impact Report No. 230 and the Addendure to Environmental Impact Report No. 230 have been incorporated to the project design and Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Map 26941 to reduce the impacts to a level of insignificance. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 1. There is a reasonable probability that Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in. accordance with State Law. The project, as conditioned, conforms with existing applicable city zoning ordinances and development standards. Furthermore, the R:XS%STAFFRPT'~28~41VTM.PC 12/30/92 I HEI~ERY CERTIF~ that the foregoing Re~olulion was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 1st day of February, 1993 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PlANNiNG COM]VESSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING CO]VIMLSSIONERS: GARY THORNI-RI~ SFXlRETARY 10 R:I~STAFFiqPT~28941 .PC 1126/93 i e o 12. The project will not have a significant adverse affect on the environment. The County of Riverside Board of Supervisors certified EIR No. 230 in conjunction with the approval of Vesting Tentative Trm Map No. 23143 Amended No. 3 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22430. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 and Change of Zone No. 22 will not result in any new or substantially increased environmental iml:mcts' F. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, the Vesting Tract Map proposed is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. Section 2. F-nvironmenml Compliance. An Addendure to Envh'onmental Impact Report No. 230 was prepared for this project indicates that the proposed pwject will not have a significant impact on the environment with the incorporation of the mitigation measures into the project design. Section 3. Conditions. The City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of Change of Zone No. 22 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 2694 1, to subdivide a 133 acre parcel into 28 large lot custom single family lots located south of Pauba Road, north of De Portola Road, east of Via None and west of Butterfield Stage Road subject to the foltowmg conditions: A. Attachment No. 2, attached hereto. Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this 4th day of January, 1993. LINDA FAHEY CHAIRMAN I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 4th clay of January 4, 1993 by the following vote of the Commission: A YES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: GARY THORNI-m.L SECRETARY 11 '- R:~S~STAFFRPT%28941VTM.PC 12/30/92 kJb ATTACHMENT NO. 2 AMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 11 .R:IS'~S'1'AI~O41.p,r,, 1/2e/93 Idb CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Vesting Tentative Tract Map No: 26941 Project Description: To subdivide 133 acres into Custom Single Family Residential Estate Lots. Assessor's Parcel No.:" 952-030-002 952-030-003 952-030-007 952-030-010 28 Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: Within forty-eight (48) hours of the approval of this project the aPPlicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Eight Hundred, Seventy-Five Dollars ($875.00) which includes the Eight Hundred, Fifty Dollar ($850.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) IDlus the Twenty-Five Dollar IS25.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code of Regulations 15094. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the apiDlicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning DeiDartment the check required above, the aiDl~roval for the Project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). The tentative subdivision shall corniDly with the State of California Subdivision Maid Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460 unless modified.by the conditions listed below· This conditionally aiDproved tentative maid will exiDire two years after the al~13roval date. A time extension may be aiDproved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, uiDon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents, officer, and emiDIoyees from any claim, action~ or IDroceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees to attach; set aside, void, or annul an al~iDroval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, aiDiDeal boards or legislative body concerning Vesting Tentative Tract MaID No. 26941, which action is brought within the time period IDrovided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the 12 R:~'~"TAFFNrr'~26941 .PC 1/26/93 e 10. 11. 'City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. Tho dovolopmont of thio ;reject oholl be oonoistent with Dovolopmont Agroomont No. z'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-~h. (deleted by Planning Commission January 4, 1993) The development of this project shall be consistent with the Design Guidelines prepared by Planning Design Solutions, All walls and fences shall ..be consistent with the approved Design Guidelines for location and materials. All monumentat/on within the project shall be consistent with the Planning Design Solutions Design Guidelines for location and materials. A biological assessment of the Gnatcatcher shall be required prior to issuance of grading permits, if the species is listed as endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife and/or the California Department of Fish and Game. Necessary mitigation measures acceptable to these agencies shall be implemented prior to issuance of grading permits. Rough and precise grading plans shall be in substantial conformance with the approved Vesting Tentative Map G~ading and Drainage Plan. Street trees shall be provided at approximately 60 foot intervals or a minimum of one tree per lot frontage as required in Section 13.1 or Ordinance 460. Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) A. CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. The CC&R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining the open space, 100-year flood plain, recreation areas, parking areas, I~rivate roads, and exzerior of all buildings. (amended by staff February 1, 1993) No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. 13 R:%$~%'I'AFF~'~26~41.pC 1126/13 Idb Ce Maintenance for all landscaped and open areas, including parkways, shall be provided for in the CC&R's. The CC&R's shall state that the developer of each individual lot shall develop in conformance with the building pad area as shown on the approved rough and precise grading-plans. Ee Fe Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shell own as an appurtenance to such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) as share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association, owning the common areas and facilities. The CC&R's shall state that portions of lots 4,5,6,7,8 and 10 are located within the l O0-year flood plain and may not be disturb in any manner and no structures or r~ucture= shall he constructed. An exhibit shall accompany the CC&R's to delineate this area. (amended by Planning Commission January 4, 1993) 12. Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following: A. Lots created by this arabdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the Residential Agriculture (R-A-5 and R-A-2½) zone. B. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Director of Building and Safety. 13. The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all slopes, landscaped areas and irrigation systems until such time as those operations are the responsibilities of other parties as approved by the Planning Director. 14. The applicant, their assignees and successors shall provide and distribute an airport disclosure statement to' all potential home buyers of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 26941. Said disclosure shall be distributed separately and in addition to the public report prepared for the Department of Real Estate. Said disclosure shall be presented to and signed by the potential home buyer, prior to entering into any contract for purchase. Said disclosure shall be approved by the Planning Director as to form, and shall advise of Potential airport impacts, and the potential requirement of an avigation easement. (amended by Planning Commission January 4, 1993) PRIOR 15. 16. TO RECORDATION: An avigation easement to the Pauba Ranchos Airstrip shall be granted. Said easement shall be approved by the Planning Director and City Attorney as to form and content. (Amended by Planning Commission January 4, 1993) An easement for maintenance of the 100-year flood plain shall be granted to the Home Owners Association. (Amended by Planning Commission January 4, 1993) 14 R:~St~'rAFFRFT~26941.pC 1/26/93 17, 19, 20, Subdivision phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning Department approval. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map, Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. The following notes shall be placed on the ECS: "This property is located within thirty {30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy.' "EIR No. 230 and an Addendum to this EIR was prepared for this project and is on file at the City of Temecula Planning Department." "A portion of lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 10 are located within the 100-year flood plain and shall be maintained as permanent open space. This area shall not be disturbed in any manner and no structures or obstructions shall be allowed." This area is to be identified on the ECS sheet. {amended by Planning Commission January 4, 1993) 21. 22. D. An avigation easement to the Pauba Ranchos Airstrip shall be granted. Said easement shall be approved by the Planning Director and City Attorney as to form and content, (amended by Planning Commission January 4, 1993) A mmga~ion monitoring program shall be submitted to identify all environmental mitigation measures contained in the Conditions of Approval, Environmental Impact Report No. 230 and Addendure to Environmental Impact Report No. 230. This program shall identify the impacts, the mitigation measures, the stage of the development the mitigation measures are to be enforced and the responsible part~/for monitoring the mitigation measures, All costs necessary to implement this program shall be the responsibility of the applicant. The applicant shall delete all references to the Regional Biological Enhancement Area that are presently shown on the Tentative Map. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS: 23. Necessary mitigation measures acceptable to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife and/or the California Deparzment of Fish and Game shall be implemented prior to issuance of grading permits to reduce the impact of the project on K-Rats to a level of insignificance. If mitigation measures are unavailable, grading permits shall not be issued. A new K-Rat study may be required if deemed necessary by the Planning Director. 15 R:~'rAFFRPT'~26141 ,PC 1126/13 Idb 24. A qualified Paleontologist shall be retained by the developer for consultation and comment on the proposed grading with respect to Potential Paleontological impacts. Should the paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to significant resources, a pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist and the excavation and grading Contractor shall be arranged. When necessary, the Paleontologist or representative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils. 25. 26. An overall conceptual landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department · for approval prior to issuance of any grading permits. This plan shall highlight all the areas which will be landscaped including slopes within individual lots, common area slopes/open space, street trees, medians, tall tree planting for birds of prey within the 100-year flood plain, etc. Construction landscape plans for each phase shall be submitted for approval to the Planning Department prior to issuance of any building permits for that phase. All common area landscaping for each phase shall be installed prior to issuance of the final for any house in that phase. All Private parks within each individual phase shall be developed prior to issuance of the final for the first house on that phase. All graded slopes over three feet in height shall be landscaped and irrigated according to the City Development Code. (amended by the Planning Commission January 4, 1993) An overall fencing plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval prior to issuance of any grading permits which shall contain the following: A. A block, wrought iron, or a combination block and wrought iron wall shall be constructed along the westerly boundary of the project unless it has been previously constructed. For the easterly Portion of the project that runs along the City boundary, the developer shall provide a block or wrought iron wall. At the applicants discretion, other materials, as approved by the Planning Director, can be IDrovided along the property line. For the northerly area that borders the park site and the southerly area that borders the school and park site. the developer shall provide a block, wrough~ iron, or a combination block and wrought iron wall. D. The Placement of rear or side yard fencing on each individual lot is optional and is to be at the discretion of each individual home owner. If there is to be rear or side yard fencing, materials are to be approved by the Planning Director. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 27. Individual homes on individual lots shall require Planning Department approval. 28. A detailed landscaping and irrigation plan, prepared by a licensed landscape architect, shall be submitted to the City Planning Department for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 16 R:~lSTAFFRPT~6~41 .PC 1/26/~3 29. No building Permits shall be issued by the City for any residential lot/unit within the project boundary until the developer or its auccessor's-in-ir~erest provides evidence of compliance with public facility financing measures. A cash sum of one-hundred dollars (~100) per lot/unit shall be deposited with the City as mitigation for public library development. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PFRMITS: 30. All landscaping and irrigation within each individual lot shall be installed in accordance with approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permit for that lot. If seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director and the Director of Building and Safety. 31. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans and shall be verified by City field inspection. 32. All landscaping and irrigation outside individual lots shall be completed prior to issuance of the first occupancy permit. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS: The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of Public Works. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map or site plan all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: 33. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all onsite flat work and improvements) construction shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right- of-way. 34. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior To commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City righT-of-way. 35, All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. 17 R:~"tSTAFFRPT~8141.pC 112e/~3 klb 36. PRIOR Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section. TO ISSUANCE OF nRADING PERMITS: 37. 38. The final grading plan shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works, All pad drainage shall be directed to appropriate drainage swales or devices. No concentrated drainage shall be conveyed over slopes except within concrete brow ditches or other approved drainage devices, 39. 40. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board, No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: 41. 42. 43. 44. · San Diego Regional Water Quality; Riverside County Rood Control District; · Planning Department; · Department of Public Works; and · U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and Pavement sections. An erosion control plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weedfree condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Department of Public Works. A permit from the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers is required prior to pulling any permits for construction, as outlined in the Department of the Army letter, dated December 4, 1991. 45. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is Payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has been already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid, 18 R:~S~'rAFFRPT~e~41.pC 1126/~3 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. The developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or easements for any offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works, A hydrology/hydraulic study shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval, The drainage study shall include, but not be limited to, the following criteria: Drainage and flood protection facilities which will protect all structures by diverting site runoff to streets or approved storm drain facilities as directed by the Department of .Public Works. Adequate provision shall be made for the acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. C. The impact to the site from any flood zone as shown ~n the FEMA flood hazard' map and any necessary mitigation to protect the site. D. Identify and mitigate impacts of grading to any adjacent floodway. E. The location of existing and post development 100-year floodplain and floodway shall be shown on the improvement plan. F. Minimum flowline grade in earthen swales shall be 1.0% unless otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works. The subdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited for drainage Purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate facilities as approved by the Department of Public Works. Concrete lined drainage swales with energy dissipators will be required to protect all slopes and structures. Runoff to streets or to storm drains shall be kept substantially free of all rocks and debris. ' The subdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing facilities. A drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners for the release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy of the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review prior to recordation. The location of the recorded easement shall be delineated on the grading plan. 19 R:~"~"rAFFRPT%2e~41 ,PC 1126/93 52. Prior to issuance of grading permits, a qualified Paleontologist shall be retained by the developer for consultation and comment on the proposed grading with respect to potential Paleontological impacts. Should the paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to significant resources, a Pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist and the excavation and grading contractor shall be arranged, When necessary, the paleontologist or representative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ENCROACHMENT PI=RMiTS: 53. All necessary grading Permit'requirements shall have been submitted/accomplished' to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. Improvement plans, including but not limited to, streets, utilities; street lights, driveways and drainage facilities shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer on 24" x 36" mylar sheets and approved by the Department of Public Works. Final plans (and profiles for improvements within public right of way) shall show the location of existing utility facilities and easements as directed by the Department of Public Works. The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans to be submitted to the Department 'of Public Works: 54. 55. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula standards 207 and 401 (curb and sidewalk). G, Street lights shall be installed along Via Del Monte, Cee Cee Lane and Castell Way adjoining the site in accordance with Ordinance 461 and shall be shown on the improvement plans as directed by the Department of Public Works. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City standard 400 and 401. Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries or as otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works. Minimum centerline radii shall be in accordance with City standard 113 or as otherwise approved by the Deparzment of Public Works. Private driveways from street to residence shall be a minimum width of 16 feet of A.C. Paving or P.C.C. Concrete. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as · approved by the Department of Public Works. All fire truck turnarounds shall be fully paved with material consistent with the driveway improvements. 2O R:I'S~q'AFFNrr'%28941.PC 1128/'83 Idb Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. A minimum of 150 feet of t4~f4ie vehicle stacking area shall be provided between the access control box of any gated entry end the right of way of intersecting public streets. A Turnaround with a minimum 38-foct radius shall be provided before the gated entry. (amended by Public Works staff February 1, 1993) All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through undersidewalk drains. 56. The minimum centerline grade for streets shall be 0.50 percent or as otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works. 57. Improvement plans per City Standards for the private streets shall be required for review and approval by the Department of Public Works. 58. All driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula standards and shall be shown on the street improvement plans. 59. All driveways shall be located a minimum of two (2) feet from the side property line. 60. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall' be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence. 61. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground. 62. All conditions of the grading permit and encroachment permit shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the-Public Works Department. 63. A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer for any lane closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF FINAL MAP: 64. The developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. Street improvements, which may include, but are not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, and other traffic control devices as appropriate. B. Storm drain facilities 21 R:~S~STAFFRPT~eB41.pC 1/26/93 klb 65. 66. 67. C. Landscaping (slopes and parkways). D. Erosion control and slope protection. E. Sewer and domestic water systems. F. All trails, as required by the City's Master Plans. G. Undergrounding of proposed utility distribution lines. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho California Water District; Eastern Municipal Water District; Riverside County Rood Control District; City of Temecula Fire Bureau; Planning Department; Department of Public Works; Riverside County Health Department; CATV Franchise; Parks and. Recreation Department; General Telephone; Southern California Edison Company; Southern California Gas Company; and U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Legal all-weather primary and secondary access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be I~rovided from the tract map boundary to a paved City maintained road. {amended by Public Works staff February 1, 1993) All road easements and/Or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the I~ublic and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. 68. Cee Cee Lane from Orlinda Drive to Lisa Road and Via Del Monte shall be improved with 20 feet of asphalt concrete pavement plus one 12-foot lane, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated right-of-way in accordance with City Standard No. 104, Section A (60'/40.'). 69. Castell Way shall be improved with 22 feet of asphalt concrete pavement plus one 12- foot lane, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated right-of-way in accordance with City Standard No. 103, Section A (66'/44'). 70. All interior private streets shall be improved with 40 feet of asphalt concrete Pavement, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated easements in accordance with Ordinance 460 and City Standard No. 104, Section A (60'/40'). Sidewalks shall be constructed on a minimum of one side of the street as directed by the Department of Public Works. 22 R:t'S~TAFFIIrr~e~41.PC, 1/2e/~3 71. 72. 73. 75. 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. 81. McMahon Drive shall be fully improved with 44 feet of asphalt concrete pavement from the tract boundary to Crowne Hill Drive, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated right-of-way in accordance with City Standard No. 103, Section A (66'/44'). Castell Way shall be improved with a minimum of 32 feet of asphalt concrete pavement from the tract boundary to Crowne Hill Drive, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within a 60-foot minimum right-of-way in accordance with City Standard No. 106, Section B (60'/32'). In the event that Crowne Hill Drive is not constructed by Assessment District No. 159 prior to the final map recordation, the developer shall construct or bond for the improvements to provide for a minimum of 32' of street improvements within a 60- foot right-of-way per City Standard No. 106, Section B {60'/32'). The improvements shall be constructed prior to the firat occupancy. (amended by the Planning Commission January 4, 1993) ' The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the developer shall, prior to submittal of the final map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements Pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at the developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and aiDproved by the Department of Public Works for Castell Way and shall be included in the street improvement plans. Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering for the design requirements. A 60 foot easement shall be dedicated for public utilities and emergency vehicle access for all private streets. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated and noted on the final map. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated where sidewalks meander through private property. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site 23 R:I*S~STAFFRF~26841-PC 1/26/13 idb 82. 83. 84. 85. PRIOR 86. 87. 88. drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating 'drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions." Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be Permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The following information shall be on the ECS: " The delineation of the area within the 100 - year floodplain. Special Study Zones. C. 'This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory.. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply With the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy." The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Department of Public Works a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. Prior to recording the final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street improvements. TO BUILDING PERMIT: A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of Payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the 24 R:~SIb"rAFFRPT%28941.pC 1128/93 Idb developer shall execute the Agreement for Payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed 910,000. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benere to the project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the process, leW, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; orovided that developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY: 89. All improvements shall be completed and in place perthe app. roved plans, including but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, drainage facilities, parkway trees and street lights on all public streets. All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and striping plan. The subdivider shall provide "stop" controls at the intersection of local streets with arterial streets as directed by the Department of Public Works. 90. 91. 92, Landscaping shall be installed in place in the corner cut-off area of all intersection and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance as directed by the Department of Public Works. OTHER AGENCIES: 93. The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal dated October 31 1991 a copy of which is attached. , , 94. 95. The applicant shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated February 22, 1988, a copy of which is attached. If the project lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of City of Temecula Land Division Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the C~ty pnor to issuance of Occupancy Permits. The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County of Riverside Fire Department's letter dated August 31 1992, a copy of which is attached. , 96. 97. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho California Water District transmittal dated October 31, 1991, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Army Corps of Engineers transmittal dated December 2, 1991, a copy of which is attached. 25 R:~S%*STAFF~eI41.pC 1126fl3 98. Applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Temecula Valley Unified School District transmittal dated December 3, 1992. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICF.~ DEPARTMENT 99. 100. 101. 102. Prior to recordation of. the Final Map, the applicant or his assignee shall pay the fair market value of .36 acres of parkland to comply with City Ordinance No. 460.93 {Quimby). The amount to be paid shall be determined by TCSD staff within thirty (30) · days prior to the recordation of said map. Exterior slopes (as defined as: Those slopes contiguous to residential streets that have a width of 66' or greater), shall be offered for dedication .to the City of Temecula for maintenance Purposes following compliance to TCSD standards and completion of the application process. All other slopas and open space shall be maintained by an established Home Owners' Association {HOA). · All proposed slopes and open space intended for dedication to the City of Temecula shall be identified on the Final Map by numbered lot, with the square footage of said lot number indexed as proposed City Maintenance area. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the subdivider shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be executed, guaranteeing the construction of all proposed TCSD landscape maintenance areas. Landscape construction drawings for project areas identified as TCSD maintenance areas shall bereviewed and approved by TCSD staff. 103. 104. 105. Construction of proposed TCSD landscape maintenance areas shall commence pursuant to a pre-job meeting with the developer and City Maintenance Superintendent. Failure to comply with the TCSD review process will Preclude acceptance of these areas into the TCSD maintenance program. It shall be the developer's or assignee's responsibility to disclose the existence of the Temecula Community Services District and its service level assessments to all prospective Purchasers. This disclosure shall be in the form acceptable to the TCSD and made available to staff for .their review, as set forth acceptable to the TCSD and made available to staff for their review, as set forth in Section 2795.1 of the regulations of the Real Estate Commissioner. Prtor to the issuance of any building permit, the developer shall submit the current list of Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN) to the assigned tract. 26 R:~Sl$1'AFF~2e~I, 1.pC 1/28/93 Idb ATTACHMENT NO. 3 EXHIBITS 27 R:%S~'TAFFNrT'~2eI41.PC 112e/93 Idb CITY OF TEMECULA v~ c ~N~TY MAP N.T.S. CASE NO.: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 EXHIBIT: A P.C. DATE: February 2, 1993 VICINITY MAP R:~S~I'AFFRF'~26941.pC 1128/93 klb CITY OF TEMECULA TRACT MAP NO. 26941 - ~., / ~ ~ ...... / ? ..../.. ~ T// CASE NO.: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 EXHIBIT: B AMENDED VTTM NO. 26941 P.C. DATE: February 2, 1993 29 R:x. SXSTAFFRPl"~.,26941.pC 1126/93 kJb CITY OF TEMECULA CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 22 CASE NO.: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 EXamnIT: C AMENDED ZONE CHANGE NO. 22 P.C. DATE: February 2, 1993 3O R:XS~STAFFRP'T'~26941.pC 1/26/93 Idb CITY OF TEMECULA ' REVISFn VESTING TENYATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23143 ---'%~:rowne Hill CASE NO.: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 EXHIBIT: D TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 22143 P.C. DATE: February 2, 1993 31 R:%S~'STAFFRFT~26941.PC 1/26193 klb A'T'FACHMENT NO. 4 APPLICANT'S EXHIBITS 1 '7 32 R:~S~STAFFRPT~e941.pC 1128/93 Idb Single Family Lots Estate L~ts 33 '6 · | I Section C- C lit Pad f iL IXS Existing Ground Line ' ~ ' Property Line Single Family Lots ~ Estate Lots I lit Pad Section B - B Existing Ground Line rammr.. 41' Property Iine I Single Family Lots , jlOY JWtlllO ~ 30' ' ' '~ Section A - A NOTE: See Exhibit 3 For Locations of Cross Sections 113' 19t' 60' 20' Road %~'----,_ [l. llm Pad Crowne Hill Estate LoB Cross Sections of Transition Areas Exhibit 2 Tnm~an¢ tll111Illll Section C- C Estate L~ts 125' ___ P[d ..... RIZt5 F.,adsting Ground Line 'r- Property line Single Family Lots .~ Estate Lots I lit R ID0 I ' 45' '-__,:, __. Section B - B Single Family Lots ' loy ' 30' Section A - A NOTE: See Exhibit 3 For Locations of Cross Sections 19Y IIY Roxl Existing Ground Line 2~ ""~ ...... u,,,o ~ Existing Ground Une 'T" Crowne Hill Estate Lots Cross Sections of Transition Areas Ex~bit 2 ! -. II GATED EN~RY'~~ PRIVATE 'STREET 150' TRAFFIC STACKING AREA'- MINIMUM 5' I 20'_ 25' '1 b ~'~CURB ENTRY AREA DETAIL EXHIBIT' #6 Cllllll/Irl U Id m IIIII ~TEM #3 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION January 4, 1993 Case No.: Change of Zone No. 22, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 and Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 230. RECOMMENDATION: Prepared By: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner RECOMMEND Adoption of Resolution No. 93- recommending Approval of Change of Zone No. 22, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 and the Addendum to Environmental Iml~act Report No. 230, based on the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report; and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PROJECT NAME: Taylor Woodrow Homes, California Limited Trans-Pacific Consultants Crowne Hill Estates PROPOSAL: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: A request for approval of a Change of Zone from Residential Agriculture, 5 acre minimum lot size (R-A-5) to Residential Agriculture, 2.5 acre minimum lot size (R-A-2~) for lots 8, 9, 12, 13, 17, 18, 26, 27, and 28 and from R-A-2 ½ to R-A-5 for a portion of lot 4 and a request for approval of a subdivision to include 28 custom single family lots on 1.33 acres. Northerly of De Portola Road, Southerly of Pauba Road, Easterly of Via Norte, and Westerly of Butterfield Stage Road. Residential Agriculture, 2.5 acre minimum lot size (R-A-2 ½) and Residential Agriculture, 5 acre minimum lot size (R-A-5) North: South: East: West: County Open Space Combining Zone (R-5) County One Family Dwellings (R- 1 ) Residential Development (R-4) and Planned ~tS~STAFFR~'~26941VTM.pC 12/30/92 PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: Residential Agriculture, 2.5 acre minimum lot size (R-A-2 ½ ) and Residential Agriculture, 5 acre minimum lot size {R-A-5) Vacant SURROUNDING LAND-USES: PROJECT STATISTICS North: South: East: West: Vacant and Custom One Family Dwellings Vacant Vacant and Custom One Family Dwellings Vacant Number of lots 28 Total Area 133.00 Average parcel size 4.75 Minimum lot size 2.50 Gross density 0.21 Excavation '198,800 Import 1,200 BACKGROUND aCreS acres acres dwelling units per acre cubic yards cubic yards Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 is a remapping of previously approved yet never recorded map. The Previously approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23143, along with EIR No. 230, Development Agreement No. 26 and Design Guidelines were approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors in August of 1988. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting approval to subdivide 133 acres into 28 custom single family lots. The lots will vary in size from 2.5 acres to 10.6 acres. The project is zoned R-A-5 and R-A- 2 ~. Development Agreement No. 26 and the Design Guidelines that were previously approved with Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23143 apply to Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941. The Project site lies within two zoning districts, R-A-5 and R-A-2 ~. The request for zone change will change the zoning to conform with the design of the project. A portion of lots 8, 9, 12, 13, 17, 18, 26, 27 and 28 will change from R-A-5 to R-A-2 ~ and a portion of lot 4 will change from R-A-2 ~ to R-A-5. , The eastern portion of the property is currently located within the 100-year flood plain and comprises approximately 9.5 acres. The 100 year flood plain runs through lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 10. The project has been conditioned to ensure that this portion of the property will be properly preserved as open space and no structures will be allowed (refer to Conditions No. 11 and 16). , o I~ISlI"TAFFRPT~26841VTM.pC 12/30/12 The project's primary access will be provided from Crown Hill Drive. The construction and .completion of this road will be required prior to Certificate of Occupancy for any of the lots with the project (refer to Condition No. 67). ANALYSIS One. of the primary issues relating to the proposed project is grading. Grading for the site will involve approximately 198,000 cubic yards of cut and fill which will be primarily balanced on site. The project will require the import of approximately 1,200 cubic yards of fill. To minimize grading the project has been conditioned to insure that future grading and construction of pads will conform to the conceptual grading as shown on the Tentative Map (refer to Conditions No. 9 and 11 ). As this is an area of Potential paleontological resources, a qualified Paleontologist shall be required to monitor the grading of the site and supervise the recovery, cataloguing and curation of any fossil remains uncovered during grading (refer to Condition No. 20). When the Crowne Hill (Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23143) project was originally considered for approval, included within the 100-year flood plain was a proposed 8 acre Regional Biological Enhancement Area. The enhancement area was proposed to be used by Assessment District 159 for off-site mitigation for district's channelization of Temecula Creek project. Subsequent to the original approval of the Crowne Hill project, Assessment District 159 was required to provided on-site rather than off-site mitigation, thus eliminating the requirement for the enhancement area. The applicant will be required to remove all references to the enhancement area prior to the recordation of the final map (refer to Condition No. 18). Other environmental issues include the potential existence of Stephen's Kangaroo Rat and the California Gnatcatcher. The Projecthas been conditioned to ensure these issues are properly mitigated prior to any disturbance of the project site (refer to Conditions No. 7 and 18). The minimum lot size for the Project will be 2 ~ acres and lot sizes for the project will vary from 2 ]/2 to 10 acres. The large lot design of the project is consistent with the neighboring lots to the north, south and east. The project will provide a buffer between the Crowne Hill E)eveloDment which is composed of 5,000-6,000 square foot lots to the west and the large lots to the east. ZONING, FUTURE GENERAL PLAN AND SWAP CONSISTENCy The project is zoned Residential Agriculture, 5 acre minimum lot size (R-A-5) and Residential Agriculture, 2 Y, acre minimum lot size (R-A-2 ~ ). This Project is proposing a zone change that will change 9 tots from R-A-5 to R-A-2 ~ and I lot from R-A-2 ½ to R-A-5. The total gross acreage of the site is 133 acres. The lot sizes for the project will range from 2.5 acres to 10.6 acres. The proposed project is consistent with the R-A development standards. The future General Plan Draft Preferred Land Use Map designates the site as Very Low Density Residential (0.2 to 0.4 dwelling units per acre) with a target density of 0.3 dwelling units per acre. The project density of .21 dwelling units per acre is compatible with the density and target density of the future General Plan. The proposed project is consistent with SWAP which designates the site as 2-4 dwelling units per acre. ,, R:~Af:~IVTM-PC 12/30/'92 kab ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION An Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No, 230 was prepared by Staff and no additional significant impacts were identified as a result of the filing of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941, Environmental Impact Report No, 230 included analysis of the area that comprises Vesting Tentative Tract Map No, 26941 along with Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23143, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No, 26941 has not been changed significantly or altered the environmental impacts that were examined in .Environmental Impact Report No, 230. The mitigation measures contained in the Conditions of Approval will be implemented in order to mitigate the impacts of the development, SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The proposed project meets the requirements of Ordinance 348, Ordinance 460 and the City's future General Plan. Conditions placed upon the project will insure that future development · will not have excessive grading and will blend with the hillside topography, FINDINGS Change of Zone No. 22 There is a reasonable probability that Change of Zone No. 22 will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State Law, due to the fact that the density of the project, .21 dwelling units/acre, is consistent with the Very Low Density Residential Land Use designation of the future General Plan, Furthermore, the proposed R-A-2 ~ and R-A-5 zones will be consistent with the Very Low Density Residential Zoning District. There fs not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference, with the future General Plan if Change of Zone No. 22 is ultimately inconsistent with the Plan, due to the fact that the project is consistent with the existin9 large lot custom single family dwelling developments in the immediate vicinity and their underlyin9 zones. The proiect is compatible with surrounding land uses since this project is a single family dwelling development and the surrounding land uses are single family dwellings, a golf course and vacant land. 4. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on the environment since mitigation measures of Environmental Impact Report No. 230 and the Addendure to Enwronmental Impact Report No. 230 have been incorporated to the project design and Condftions of Approval to reduce the impacts to a level of insignificance. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 '- There is a reasonable probability that Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable t~me and in accordance with State Law. The project, as conditioned, conforms with existing applicable city zoning ordinances and development standards. Furthermore, the proposed density of the project, .21 dwelling units per acre, is consistent with the future General Plan Land Use Designation of Very Low Density Residential. R:~STAFIqqPT~e141VTM.pC 12/30/92 Idb e e e e 10. 11. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with the City's future General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the Plan, since the surrounding land uses are large lot custom single family dwellings and vacant land. The proposed use or action as conditioned complies with State planning and zoning laws, local Ordinance Nos. 348 and 460; and California Governmental Code Sections 65000-66009 (Planning and Zoning Law). The project as designed and conditioned will not adverseiy affect the public health or welfare since all impacts have been mitigated to a level of insignificance. The project is compatible with surrounding land 4Jses since the proposed large lot custom single family dwellings are consistent with the existing large lot custom single family dwellings and the vacant land surrounding the project. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the built or natural environment as determined in Environmental Impact Report No. 230 and the subsequent Addendure for this project. Said Findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference, due to the fact that they are referenced in the attached Staff Report, Exhibits, Environmental Impact Report, Environmental Impact Report Addendum and Conditions of Approval. The Planning Commission has considered the effect of its action upon the housing needs of the region and has balanced these needs against the public service needs of ~ts residents and available fiscal and environmental resources (Gov. Code Section 66412.3) and finds that the project density is consistent with SWAP and the' future General Plan. Additionally, it will provide more diversity in the housing type available to the residents of the City of Temecula. The proposed Project will not result in discharge of waste into the existing sewer system that is in violation of the requirements as set out in Section 13000 et seq. of the California Water Code by requiring the project to COrnIDly with Eastern Municipal Water District's requirements. The design of the subdivision provides to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling oPPortunities in the subdivision (Gov. Code Section 66473.1 ) by hmit~ng the height of the future structures to 32 feet and requiring setbacks according to the Residential Agriculture (R-A) standards. The project has acceptable access by means of dedicated right-of-way and has been conditioned to have secondary access from Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23143, Amendment No. 5 for the necessary right-of-way for access. R:~J~STAFFRle~2eI41VTM.PC 12130/~2 k,lb e o 5. 6. 7. 12. The project will not have a significant adverse affect on the environment. The County of Riverside Board of Supervisors certified EIR No. 230 in conjunction with the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map "No. 23143 Amended No. 3 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22430. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 and Change of Zone No. 22 will not result in any new or substantially increased environmental impacts. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Attachments: RECOMMEND Adoption of Resolution No. 93- recommending Approval of Change of Zone No. 22, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 and the Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 230, based on the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report; and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. Resolution No. 93- - blue page 7 Conditions of Approval - blue page 12 Exhibits - blue page 27 A. Vicinity Map B. SWAP C. Zoning D. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 E. Zone Change No. 22 F. Tentative Tract Map 23143 Environmental Impact Report No. 230 - blue page 35 Addendure to Environmental. Impact Report No. 230 - blue page 36 Development Agreement No. 26 - blue page 38 Design Guidelines - blue page 39 R:Ib"%JTAFFRwT%28941V'rM.PC 12130192 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 93- RESOLUTION NO. A RESOL~ON OF ~ PLANNING COM~.~SION OF Tnv. CITY OF TEMECULA RECO~ING APPROVAL OF CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 22 TO CHANGE THE ZONING FROM R-A-$ TO R-A-2~I FOR PORTIONS OF LOTS 8, 9, 12, 13, 17, 18, 26, 27 AND 28 AND FROM R-A-2~I TO R-A- 5 FOR A FORTION OF LOT 4 FOR VE~TING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 26941, AND TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF VE~TING 'TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 26941 TO $U'IiDIVIDE A 133 ACRE PARCEt. INTO 28 CUSTOM SINGt.t FAM~.Y LOTS LOCATED SOUTH 'OF PAUBA ROAD, NORTH OF DE FORTOLA ROAD, EAST OF VIA NORTE AND WEST OF B~ x~ STAGE ROAD. ~, Taylor Woodrow Homes filed Change of Zone No. 22 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 in acconhn~ with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; ~ ~ said applications were processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHERE&S, the Planning Commk~ion eomidered said applications on January 4, 1993, at which time intet=sted persons had an oppommity to testify either in support or opposition; WI~_,REAS, at the conclusion of th~ Commi-~ion hearing, the Commission recommended approval of said applications; NOW, TI:IT~REF"C)RE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF TIff, CITY OF TENIECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings..That the Temeeula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time. the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, ff all of the following requirements are met:' general plan. The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the 2. The planning agency fmcls, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: a. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. 8 R:'~'~"TAFFNsT'~II41V'rM.PC: 12/30/92 klb b. There is fitt~ Or no ~ of subslaatiaJ detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is u!tim~tely inconsistent with the plan. c. The pressed use or action complied with all other appficable requirements of stnt~ law and local OrdinanCeS. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as *memde~ by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (~ "SWAP") was adoptai prior to the incorporation of Temecuh as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its Genera/Plan guidelines while the City is procee41nE in a timely fashion with the preparation of its Genera] Plan. C. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of said appfications makes the following findings, to wit: Change of Zone No. 22 1. There is a reasonable probability that Change of Zone No. 22 will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State Law, due to the fact that the density of the projea, .21 dwelling units/acre, is consistent with the Very Low Density Residential Land Use designation of the future General Plan. Furthermore, the proposed R-A-2a,4 and R-A-5 zones will be consistent with the Very Low Density Residential Zoning District. 2. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference, with the future General Plan if Change of Zone No. 22 is ultimately inconsistent with the Plan, due to the fact that the project is consistent with the existing large lot custom single family dwelling developments in the mediate vicinity and their underlying zones. 3. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses since the proposed large lot custom single family dwellings are consistent with the existing large lot custom single family dwellings and the vacant land surrounding the project. 4. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on the environment since mitigation measures of Environmental Impact Report No. 230 and the Addendure to Environmental Impact Report No. 230 have been incorporated to the project design and Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Map 26941 W reduce the impacts to a level of insignificance. .. Vesting Tentative Traa Map No. 26941 I. There is a reasonable probability that Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with Slate Law. The project, as conditioned, conforms with existing applicable city zoning ordinances and development standards. Furthermore, the R:~"rA~IVTM.laC 12/30/12 proposed density of the project, .21 dwdling units per acre, b con,~.ne~t with ti~ future Plan Land Use D~i~on of V~ry Low Density l~-sidenfinl. with the City's fum~ General Plan, if ti~ ~ use is nlHm~Vely inconsistent with the Plan, since the surrounding land uses ate large lot custom single family dwellings and vacant land. · 3. The proposed us~ or action as conditioned complies with State planning and zoning laws, local Ordinance Nos. 348 and 460; and California Governmental Code Sections 65000-66009 (Planning and Zonin~ Law). 4. The project as deaigned and condifioned wffi not adversely affect the public health or weftaxe since all impacts have been mitigated to a level of insignificance. family dwellings and ~e vacant ~ngtrrounding the project.t~ existing large lot custom single 6. The project as..designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the built or natural environment as determined in Environmental Impact Report .No. 230 and the Addendure for this project. 7. Said Findings are suppoRed by minutes,. maps, exhibits and envin:mmental documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference, due to the fact that they are referenced in the attached Staff Report, Exhibits, Environmental Impact Report, and Conditions of Approval. . 8. The Planning Commission has considered the effect of its action upon the housing needs of the region and has balanced these needs against the public service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environmental resources (Gov. Code Section 66412.3) and Finds that the project density is consistent with SWAP and the future General Plan. Additionally, it will provide more diversity in the housing type available to the residents of the City of Temecula. 9. The proposed project will not result in discharge '0f waste into the existing sewer system that is in violation of the requirements as set out in Section 13000 et seq. of the California Water Code by requiring the project to comply with Eastern Municipal Water Distnct's requirements. 10. The design of the subdivision provides to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the sulxtivision (Gov. Code Section 66473. I) by limiting the height of the future structures to 32 feet and nxluiring setbacks according to the Residential Agriculture (R-A) standards. 11. The projea has acceptable access by means of dedicated right-of-way and has been conditioned to have secondary access from Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23143, Amendment No. 5 for the necessary right-of-way for secondary access. I0 R:'~TAI=FI~6141V'rM.ImC 1.2/30fl2 Idb 12. The project will not have a ,~nificsant adverse affect on the environment County of Riverside Board of Supenrison certified BIR No. 230 in conjunction wi~h The the approval of Vem~ng Tentative Tract Map No. 23143 Amended No. 3 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22~30. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 2~41 and Change of Zone No. 22 will not result in any new or submantially increased environmental impacts. F. As conditioned punuant to Section 3, the Vesting Tnct Map proposed is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. Section 2. F-nvironmentnl Con~linnee. An Addendure to Environmentai Lmpaa Report 'No. 230 wa~ prepared for this project indicates that the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment with the incorporation of the mitigation measures into the project design. Section3. Conditions The City ofTemeeula P!nnning Commission hereby recommends approval of Change of Zone ~t~. 22 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941, to subdivide a 133 acre parcel into 28 large lot custom single family lots locat~l south of Pauba Road, north of De Portola 'Road, east of Via None and west of Butte~ield Stage Road subject to the following conditions: A. Attachment No. 2, attached hereW. Section 4. PASSEl), APPROVEB AND ADOPTED' this 4th day of January, 1993. LINDA FAHEY I HEREBY CERTWY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 4th day of January 4, 1993 by the following vote of the Commission: A YES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COIVfiVIISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLAN'NrlNG CO1VfiVIISSIONERS: GARY THORIN'HILL SECRETARY 11 R:ISl, STAFFFI=q'126~4.1'~,TIVI.pC 12/30/)2 Idb A'i'I'ACHMENT NO. 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 12 '- ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Vesting Tentative Tract Map No: 26941 Project Description: To subdivide 133 acres into 28 Custom Single Family Residential Estate Lots. Assessor's Parcel No.: 952-030-002 952-030-003 952-030-007 952-030-010 Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: Within forty-eight (~,8) hours of the approval of this project the applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or money order Dayable to the County Clerk in the amount of Eight Hundred, Seventy-Five Dollars ($875.00) which includes the Eight Hundred, Fifty Dollar ($850.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Twenty-Five Dollar ($25.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code of Regulations 15094. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the aPPlicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning DelDartment the check recluired above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision MaD Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460 unless modified by the conditions listed below. This conditionally aDDroved tentative map will expire two years after the approval date. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration c~a~e. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents, officer, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. !f the 13 '- R:~'rA~NIVTM.pC 12/30/92 klb -6. 10. 11. City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. The development of this project shall be consistent with Development Agreement No. 26. The development of this shall project be consistent with the Design Guidelines prepared by Planning Design Solutions. All walls and fences shall be consistent with the approved Design Guidelines for location and materials. All monumentation within the project shall be consistent with the Planning Design Solutions Design Guidelines for location and materials. A biological assessment of the Gnatcatcher shall be required prior to issuance of grading permits, if the species is listed as endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife and/or the California Department of Fish and Game. Necessary mitigation measures acceptable to these agencies shall be implemented prior to issuance of grading permits. Rough and precise grading plans shall be in substantial conformance with the approved Vesting Tentative Map Grading and Drainage Plan. Street trees shall be provided at approximately 60 foot intervals or a minimum of one tree per lot frontage as required in Section 13.1 or Ordinance 460. Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) A. CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. The CC&R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining the open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, and exterior of all buildings. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless. a corporation, association, property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all Properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. 14 R:~I~l'AFF~I41V'TM.pC 12/30/92 klb C® Maintenance for all landscaped and open areas, including parkways, shall be provided for in the CC&R's. The' CC&R's shall state that the developer of each individual lot shall develop in conformance with the building pad area as shown on the approved rough and precise grading plans. Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shell own as an appurtenance to such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) as share in the corporation, o~ voting membership in an association, owning the common areas and facilities. The CC&R's shall state that portions of lots 4,5,6,7,8 and 10 are located within the l O0-year flood plain and may not be disturb in any manner and no structures shall be constructed. An exhibit shall accompany the CC&R's to delineate this area. 12. Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following: A. Lots created by this subdivision shell be in conformance with the development standards of the Residential Agriculture (R-A-5 and R-A-2 ½) zone. B. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Director of Building and Safety. 13. The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep, of all slopes, landscaped areas and irrigation systems until such time as those operations are the responsibilities of other parties as approved by the Planning Director. PRIOR TO RECORDATION: 14. 15. 16. Subdivision phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning Department approval. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. Pnor to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final maid to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the .office of the City Engineer. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. -The apl3roved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. The following notes shall be placed on the ECS: "This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy." "EIR No. 230 and an Addendum to this EIR was prepared for this project and is on file at the City of Temecula Planning. Department.' 15 :- R:~"TAFFRPT~I41VTM.pC 12/30/12 Idb 17. 18. PRIOR 19. 20. 21. 22. Ce "A portion of lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 10 are located within the 100-year flood plain and shall be maintained as permanent open space. This area shall not be disturbed in any manner and no structures shall be allowed.' This area is to be identified on the ECS sheet. A mitigation monitoring program shall be submitted to identify all environmental mitigation measures contained in the Conditions of Approval, Environmental Impact Report No. 230 and Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 230. This program shall identify the impacts, the mitigation measures, the stage of the development the mitigation measures are to be enforced and the responsible party for monitoring the mitigation measures. All costs necessary to implement this program shall be the responsibility of the applicant. The applicant shall delete all references to the Regional Biological Enhancement Area that are presently shown on the Tentative Map. TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS: Necessary mitigation measures acceptable to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife and/or the California Department of Fish and Game shall be implemented prior to issuance of grading permits to reduce the impact of the project on K-Rats to a level of insignificance. If mitigation measures are unavailable, grading permits shall not be issued. A new K-Rat study may be required if deemed necessary by the Planning Director. A qualified paleontologist shall be retained by the developer for consultation and comment on the proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological impacts. Should the Paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to significant resources, a pre-grade meeting between the Paleontologist and the excavation and grading contractor shall be arranged. When necessary, the Paleontologist or representative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils. An overall conceptual landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval prior to issuance of any grading permits.' This plan shall highlight all the areas which will be landscaped including slopes within individual lots, common area slopes/open space, street trees, medians, etc. Construction landscape plans for each phase shall be submitted for approval to the Planning Department prior to issuance of any building permits for that phase. All common area landscaping for each phase shall be installed prior to issuance of the final for any house in that phase. All private parks within each individual phase shall be developed prior to issuance of the final for the first house on that phase. All graded slopes over three feet in height shall be landscaped and irrigated according to the CitY'Development Code. An overall fencing plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval prior to issuance of any grading permits which shall contain the following: A. A block, wrought iron, or a combination block and wrought iron wall shall be constructed along the westerly boundary of the project unless it has been previously constructed. 16 R:~STAFFRIrr~2e141VTM.PC 12/30/92 Be For the easterly portion of the project that runs along the City boundary, the developer shall provide a block or wrought iron well. At the applicants discretion, other materials, as approved by the Planning Director, can be provided along the property line. C. For the northerly area that borders the park site and the southerly area that borders the school and park site the developer shall provide a block, wrought iron, or a combination block and wrought iron wall. D. The Placement of rear or side yard fencing on each individual lot is optional and is to be at the discretion of each individual home owner. If there is to be rear or side yard fencing, materials are to be approved by the Planning Director. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUll rllNG PERMITS: 23. Individual homes on individual lots shell require Planning Department approval. 24. A detailed landscaping and irrigation plan, prepared by a licensed landscape architect, shall be submitted to the City Planning Department for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 25. No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residential lot/unit within the project boundary until the developer or its successor's-in-interest provides evidence of compliance with public facility financing measures. A cash sum of one-hundred dollars (S 100) per lot/unit shall be deposited with the City as mitigation for public library development. PRIOR 26. TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS: All landscaping and irrigation within each individual lot shall be installed in accordance with approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permit for that lot. If seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director and the Director of Building and Safety. 27. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans and shall be verified by City field inspection. 28. All landscaping and irrigation outside individual lots shall be completed prior to ~ssuance of the first occupancy permit, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the DePartment of Public Works. 17 '- R:~%i'TAFFllel'~2eI41VTM.PC: 12/30/92 Idb It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map or site plan all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. GENERAL REr~UIRFMFNTS 29. 'A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all oneire flat work and improvements) construction shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right- of-way. 30. An EncrOachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 31. All improvement plans, grading plane, landscape and irrigation coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing contiguous to the site. plans shall be improvements 32. PRIOR Pursuant to Section 66493 Of fie Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section. TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS: 33. 34. 35. 36. The final grading plan shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. All pad drainage shall be directed to appropriate drainage swales or devices. No concentrated drainage shall be conveyed over slopes except within concrete brow ditches or other approved drainage devices. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: 37. San Diego Regional Water Quality; Riverside County Flood Control District; Planning Department; '. Department of Public Works; and U. S. Army Corps of Engineers; A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. 18 '- I~I~S'rA~IVTM.pC 12/30/~2 38. 39. 40. 42. 43. 44. An erosion control plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weedfree condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or Provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Department of Public Works. A parrnit from the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers is required prior to pulling any permits for construction, as outlined in the Department. of the Army letter, dated December 4, 1991. A flood mitigation charge shall be. paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Rood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has been already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. The developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or easements for any offsite work 'performed on adjacent proparties as directed by the DePartment of Public Works. A hYdrology/hydraulic study shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The drainage study shall include, but not be limited to, the following criteria: Drainage 'and flood protection facilities which will protect all structures by diverting site runoff to streets or approved storm drain facilities as directed by the Department of Public Works. Adequate provision shall be made for the acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the proparty from adjacent areas. C. The impact to the site from any flood zone as shown on the FEMA flood hazard map and any necessary mitigation to protect the site. D. Identify and mitigate impacts of grading to any adjacent floodway. E. The location of existing and post development 100-year floodplain and floodway shall be shown on the improvement plan. F. Minimum flowline grade in earthen swales shall be 1.0% unless otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works. The subdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be Prohibited for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate facilities as approved by the Department of Public Works. 19 R:~AFFFIFT~eNIV"rM.pC 12/30/82 Idb 45. 46. 47. ; 48. PRIOR 49. 50. 51. Concrete lined drainage swales with energy dissipators will be required to protect all slopes and structures, Runoff to meets or to storm drains shall be kept substantially free of all rocks and debris, The subdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns; i.e,, concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities; including enlarging existing facilities. A drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners for the release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy of the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review prior to recordation. The location of the recorded easement shall be delineated on the grading plan. Prior to issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained by the developer for consultation and comment on the proposed grading with respect to potential Paleontological impacts. Should the paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to significant resources, a pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist and the excavation and grading contractor shall be arranged. When necessary, the paleontologist or representative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils. TO THE ISSUANCE OF ENCROACHMENT PERMITS: All necessary grading permit requirements shall have been submitted/accomplished to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. Improvement plans, including but not limited to, streets, utilities, street lights, drtveways and drainage facilities shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer on 24" x 36" mylar sheets and approved by the Department of Public Works. Final plans (and profiles for improvements within public right of way) shall show the location of existing utility facilities and easements as directed by the Department of Public Works. The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans to be submitted to the Department of Public Works: Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City. of Temecula standards 207 and 401 (curb and sidewalk). Street lights shall be installed along Via Del Monte, Cee Cee Lane and Castell Way adjoining the site in accordance with Ordinance 461 and shall be shown on the improvement plans as directed by the Department of Public Works. · Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City standard 400 and 401. 2O '- R:~I'A~F~-i~26141VTM.I~C 12/30/12 Idb 52. 53. 54. Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries or as otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works. · Minimum centerline radii ahall be in accordance with City standard 113 or as otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works, Private driveways from street to residence shall be.a minimum width of 16 feet of A,C, Paving or P,C,C, Concrete, All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as approved by the Department of Public Works, All fire truck turnarounds shall be fully paved with material consistent with the driveway improvements. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. A minimum of 150 feet of traffic stacking area shall be provided between any gated entry and intersecting streets, A Turnaround with a minimum 38-foot radius shall be provided before the gated entry. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through undersidewalk drains. The minimum centerline grade for s~reets shall be 0.50 percent or as otherwise approved by the Department 'of Public Works, Improvement plans per City Standards for the private streets shall be required for review and approval by the Department of Public Works. All driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula standards and shall be shown on the street improvement plans, 55. All driveways shall be located a minimum of two (2) feet from the side property line. 56. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence. 57. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground. 58. All conditions of the grading permit and encroachment permit shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department. 59. A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer for any lane closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. 21 '- R:~J~STAFFIqPI'~NlVl'M.pC 12/30/12 Idb PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF FINAL MAP: 60. The developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works, Street improvements, which may include,. but are not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, and other traffic control devices as appropriate. Storm drain facilities 61. D. 'E. F. G. Landscaping (slopes and parkways), Erosion control and slope protection, Sewer and domestic water systems, All trails, as required by the City's Master Plans, Underground/rig of proposed utility distribution lines. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: 62. 63. Rancho California Water District; Eastern Municipal Water District; Riverside County Flood Control District; City of Temecula Fire Bureau; Planning Department;' Department of Public Works; Riverside County Health Department; - CATV Franchise; Parks and Recreation Department; General Telephone; Southern California Edison Company; - Southern California Gas Company; and U. S. Army. Corps of Engineers Legal all-weather access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract map boundary to a paved City maintained road. All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. 22 '- - R:I~S'TAFFRFT~a141VTM.p(:: 12/3Ofl2 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 73. 74. Cee Cee Lane from Orlinda Drive to Lisa Road and Via Del Monte shell be improved with 20 feet of asphalt concrete Pavement plus one 12-foot lane, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated right-of-way in accordance with City Standard No. 104, Section A (60'/40'). Castell Way shall be improved with 22 feet of asphalt concrete pavement plus one 12- foot lane, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated right-of-way in accordance with City Standard No. 103, Section A (66'/44'). All interior private streets. shall be improved with 40 feet of asphalt concrete pavement, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated easements in accordance with Ordinance 460 and City Standard No. 104, Section A (60'/40'). Sidewalks shall be constructed on a minimum of one side of the street as directed by the Department of Public Works. In the event that Crowne Hill Drive is not constructed by Assessment District No. 159 prior to the final map recordation, the develoPer shall construct or bond for the improvements to provide for a minimum of 32' of street improvements within a 60- foot right-of-way per City Standard No. 106, Section B (60'/32'). The improvements shall be constructed prior to occupancy. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests, and if he or She should fail to do so, the developer shall, prior to submittal of the final map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at the developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works for Castell Way and shall be included in the street improvement plans. Prior tO designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering for the design requirements. A 80 foot easement shall be dedicated for public utilities and emergency vehicle access for all private streets. Corner property line cut off shall be required Per Riverside County Standard No, 805. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated and noted on the final map, Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated where sidewalks meander through private property. 23 '- R:IJl'ql'AFFIIrP,26841VTM.PC 12/30/~2 75. 76. 77. 78. 79. PRIOR 80. 81. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the final map. A ncte..shall be added to the final map stating 'drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions.' Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall · be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer, A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Ranning Department for review and approval. The following information shall be on the ECS: The delineation of the area within the 1 O0 - year floodplain. Special Study Zones. C. "This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy," The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. '- Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Department of Public Works a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mmgation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. Pnor to recording the final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street improvements. TO BUILDING PERMIT: A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards and accepted grading construction Practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. 24 '- R:',b'*~TAFFFFT~OI41VTM.I::,C:: 12/30fl2 82. PRIOR 83. 84. 85. 86. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed ~10,000. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; orovided that developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof. TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY: All improvements shall be completed and in place per the approved plans, including but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, drainage facilities, parkway trees and street lights on all public streets. All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and striping plan. The subdivider shall provide ."stop" controls at the intersection of local streets with arterial streets as directed by the Department of Public Works. Landscaping shall be installed in place in the corner cut-off area of all intersection and adiacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance as directed by the Department of Public Works. OTHER AGENCIES: 87. 88. 89. The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal dated October 31 1991 a copy of which is attached. · · The applicant shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated February 22, 1988, a copy of which is attached. If the project lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of City of Temecuta Land Division Ordinance '460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the City prior to issuance of Occupancy Permits. The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County of Riverside Fire Department's letter dated August 31 1992, a copy of which is attached. · 26 R:~$~'TAFFRPT~eI41VTM.pc 12/30/92 Idb 90. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho California Water District tTansmittal dated October 31, 1991, a copy of which is attached. 91. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Army Corps. of Engineers transmittal dated December 2, 1991, a copy of which is attached. 92. Applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Temecula Valley Unified School District transmittal dated December 3, 1992. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 93. 95. 96. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the applicant or his assignee shall pay the fair market value of .36 acres of perkland to comply with City Ordinance No. 460.93 (Quimby). The amount to be peid shall be determined by TCSD staff within thirty (30) days prior to the recordation of said map. Exterior slopes (as defined as: Those slopes contiguous to residential streets that have a width of 66' or greater), shall be offered for dedication to the City of Temecula for maintenance purposes following compliance to TCSD standards and completion of the application process. All other slopes and open space shall be maintained by an established Home Owners' Association (HOA). All proposed slopes and Open space intended for dedication to the City of Temecula shall be identified on the Final Map by numbered lot, with the square footage of said lot number indexed as proposed City Maintenance area. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the subdivider shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be executed, guaranteeing the construction of all proposed TCSD landscape maintenance areas. Landscape construction drawings for project areas Jdentified as TCSD maintenance areas shall be reviewed and approved by TCSD staff. 97. 98. 99. Construction of proposed TCSD landscape maintenance areas shall commence pursuant to a pre-job meeting with the developer and City Maintenance SuperinTendent. Failure to comply with the TCSD review process will preclude acceptance of these areas into the TCSD maintenance program. IT shall be the developer's or assignee's responsibility to disclose the existence of the Temecula Community Services District and its service level assessments to all prospective purchasers. This disclosure shall be in the form acceptable to the TCSD and made available to staff for their review, as set forth acceptable to the TCSD and made available to staff for their review, as set forth in. Section 2795.1 of the regulations of the Real Estate Commissioner.' Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the developer shall submit the current list of Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN) to the assigned tract. 26 R:~S~b"TAFFRFT'~eI41VTM.pC 12/30/92 Idb DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE' 4065 COUNTY CIRCLE DR. RIVERSIDE. CA. 92503 CUlllie! Address -- P.O. 8ex 7600 925 f 3-7600) PAX n H) ~l~',dS~ October 31, 1991 · CITY OF TEHECULA -Planning Department 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 ATTN: Rich&rd Ay~I&: RE: VESTIN~ TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N0. 26941: BEING A I~SUBDIVISION 0F PARCEL MAP 22429 AS SHOWN IN BOOK 17 PAGES 14 THROUGH 19 RESPECTZVELY 0N FILE IN THE OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORIER, COUN17 OF RIVERSIDe, STATE OFCALIFORNIA. C2~ lots) Dear Gentlemen: The Department of Publ'ic Health has reviewed Vesting Tentative Tract Nap No. 26941 and recommends: A water system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the water company and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the water system shall be submitted in triplicate, with a minimum scale not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along with the original drawing to the City of Temecula. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of valves and fire hydrantsI.pipe and joint specifications. and the size of the main at the 3unction of the new system to the ex2sting system. The plans shall comply in all respects wzth D~v. 5, Part 1, Chapter 7 of the California Health and Safety Code. California Administrative Code, Title 11, Chapter 16, and General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California. when applicable. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Vesting Tentative Tract Nap 26941, is in. accordance with the water · system expansion plans of the Rancho CalXfornia Water DxstrXct and that the water sWrvices, storage, and distribution system will be adequate to provide water service to such Vesting Tentative Tract Map." City of Temecula Planning Dept. Page Two Attn: Richard Ayxla October 31, 1991 This certification does not constitute a guarantee that it will supply water to such Vesting Tentative Tract Nap at any specific quantities,.flows or pressures for fire Protection or any other purpose". This certification shall be signed by a responsible official of the water company. The nlans must he s--hmitted to The City of Tesec,,la's Office to review at least two weeks prior to the re~,,est for the recorH.-tion of the final This subdivision has a statement from Ranthe California Water District agreeing to serve domestic water to each and every lot in the subdivision on demand providing satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider. It will be necessary for financial arrangements to be made prior to the recordation of the final map. This subdivision is within.the Eastern Nunicipal Water District and shall be connected to the sewers of the District. The sewer system shall be'installed accordin9 to plans and specifications as approved by the District, the City of Temecula and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate, along with the original drawing, to the City of Temecula. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of manholes, complete profiles, pipe and 3oint specifications and the size of the sewers at the junction of the new system to the existing system. A single plat ~nd~cat~ng location of sewer lines and water lines shall be a portion of the sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be s~gned by a registered engineer and the sewer district w~th the following certification: "I certify that the design of the sewer system in Vesting Tentative Tract ~ap No. 26941 Is in Eastern ~unicipal Water District and that the waste disposal system is adequate at this time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed Vesting Tentative Tract ~ap. City of TemecuAa. Page Three Attn: Richard Ayala October 31. 1991 The.plans must be submitted to the City'of TemecuAa's Office ~o review at least two weeks prior to the request for the recordation of the final map, I~ will be necessary for financial arrangements to be completely finalized prior to recordation of the final map. Sincerely. '- Sam Mar t inez.~.E.H.S. IV ~nvi ronmentaA HoaAth 6ervi eel SM:dr K,ENN~"TI.,I 1... E:DWARDi ;- ~1,111:1e MINII]I RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT III~INI~ C&&JIIOItNi& Illel February 22, 1988 I 811 aeanlgg,,r Riverside County Planning Department County Administrative Center Riverside, California Attention: Specific Plans Ron Goldman Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: Vesting Tract 231~3 Amended No. 1 Tentative Tract 231~3 is a proposal 'to subdivide approximately .83 acres into 1,09~ residential lots; 2 open space lots and 1 park site in the Rancho California area. The property is on the east side of Butterfield Stage Road between Pauba Road and De Por:ola Road. Well defined natural watercourses carry storm runoff off of the property. The developer proposes to carry onsite runoff in the tract streets and storm drains. The onsite runoff would be out- letted ;nto the natural watercourses. Foiiow;ng are the District,s recommendations: Part of this tract is located within the limits of the Murrieta Creek/Temecula Valley Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted by the Board. Drainage fees shall be paid as set forth under the provi- sions of the "Rules and Regulations for Administration of Area Drainage Plans", amended July 3, 198.:' Drainage fees shall be paid to the Road Commissioner as part of the filing for record of the subdivision ~inal map or parcel map, or if the recording of a final parcel map is wai.ved, drainage fees s~all be paid as a condition of the waiver prior to recording a certificate of compliance evidencing the waiver of the parcel map; or At the option of the land divider, upon filing a re- quired affidavit requesting defermerit of the payment of fees, the drainage fees shall be paid to the Building.Director at the time of issuance of a grad- ing permit' or building permit for each approved par- cel,, vhichever may be first obtalned after the recording of the subdivision flnal map or parcel map; however, ·. Riverside County Planning Department Re: Vesting Tract 231~3 February 22, 1988 c. Drainage fees shall be paid to the Road Commlss.loner as a part of the flZlng for' record of the subdivision flnal map or parcel map, or before receiving a waiver to record a land division, for each lot within the land'division where oons~ruc=ton actlvtty as evi- (a) A grading permit or bulldlng permit has been obUaAned. Gradlng or structures have been Initiated. Onsite storm runoff should be returned to exlstlng flow conditions offslte. Zf s~orm runoff is diverted or con- centrated, a.dralnage easement should be obtalned from the affected property owner. A copy of the recorded drainage easement should be 8ubmtt~ed to the Dlstrlct for review prior to the re~orda~ton of the final map. Channels constructed along lot 11nes and brow ditches should be concrete lined. 3faded slopes should be Protected from erosion as needed. Temporary erosion control measures should be implemented immediately rollowing rough grading to prevent deposition o~ debris onto downstream Properties or drainage facilities. 6. Development of'thls property should be coordinated with the development of adjaoen~ Properties to ensure tha~ watercourses remain unobstructed and stormwaters are not dlverted from one watershed to another. Thls may require the construction of temporary drainage facilities or offsite construction and grading. 7. Onsitedrainage facilities 'located' outside of road right of way should be contained within drainage easements shown on the tins1 map. A note should be added to the :ins1 map stating, "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions,. 8. Orrsite drainage facilities should be located withln Publicly dedicated drainage easements obtalned from the affected property owner(s). The document(s) should be recorded and aoopy submitted to the Dlstrlot prior to recordsfinn of the flnaZ map. Riverside County Planning Department Re: Ves:ing Trac: 231~3 -3- .February 22, 1988 All lots should be graded to drain to' the adjacent street or an adequate omelet, The 10 year storm flov should be contained vithin the curb and the 100 year storm flov should be contained wlthin the street right of way. k'hen either of these criteria is exceeded, additional 4rainage facilities should be installed. ' Drainage facilities outletting sump conditions should be designed to convey the ~rlbutary 100 year storm flows. A~dl=lonal emergency escape should also be provided. 12. A copy of the improvement plans, gradlng plans and final map'along with supporting hYdrologlc and hydraulic cal- culations should be submitted to the Dlstrlc~ for revlew and approval prior to recordatlon of the final map.. Grading plans should be approved prlor Co issuance of grading permits. A registered englneer must slgn, seal and note his expiration date on plans and calculations submitted'. QuestiDns concerning this matter may be referred to Ed Lotz of t~:s cff~ce at ?1"/787-2333. CO: Rancno Pacific Engineering Very truly yours, KENNETH L. EDWARDS ..'OHN H. KASHUBA . · r Civil Engineer 210 wE,Tr SAN JACXNTO A~ · PERRY. CAJ_YFO~ 9237D August 31, 1992 ATTN: IV, E: CI~ OF TRACt leO: 969~1 With respect Co the conditions of approval for the ~bove referenced land division, the Fire Deparment retreads the following fire protection measures be provided in accordsace ~iCh P~Lverside County Ordinmnces and/or recognized fire protection s~andsrds: Schedule "B" fire protection approved standard fire hydrants, (6"x~"x2{") located one ac each street intersect!on mad spaced no more than 660 feet apart in any direction, s~Ch' no portion of say lot frontage more than 330 feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 GFM. for 2 hours. duration at 20 PSI. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans co the Fire Depar~nent for review. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, containing a Fire Department approval signature block, and shall conform to hydrant type, locacion, spacing and minimum fire flow. Once plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented =o the Fire Department for signature. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted. by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. All buildings shall be constructed with fire retardan= roofing macerial as described in Section 3203 of =he Uniform Building Code. Any wood shingles or shakes shall have a Class "B" racing and shall be approved by the Fire Departanent prior Eo installation. Prior to the recordarion of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the City of Temecula, a cash sum of $400.00 per lot/unit as mitigation for fire protection impacts. Should the developer choose to defer =he time of paymenn, he/she may enner into a written agreement with the County deferring said 'payment to =he rime of issuance of th~ firs= buildin~ permit. RJV~_~DE OFFICE FAX C714) 369J451 Frm~ nu~vzau.u~ D~vz,~z~a FIX (1~|I) An aDDroved :'.z. no>: Kev Operated Switch shall be installed in the control oanel of each of the roadway access gates aiono N~Manon Dr. Plans anO soecifications for the electric gate anO control Danel shall be mubmitte~ and aDDroved bv the Fire Deoa, r~ment ~rlo~ to in~talla'~i~n~ tion~ reoardino the meaning Of conOitions shall the F"annino anO Enolneerino Staff. be re- RAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire DeOartment Planner 191 :nae i = Srav Fire CaOtain SUecia i ist Bosrd of DU'se~rs: Ralph IL Dsfiy · Csadss F. Ko SF VN~e P~Neest domes A. Derby Dmsliss V. KuJberg defl~rey L. Miakler Stephen M. Sij|a Richlu,d D. StelTey Officers John F. Hennsgnt ; Phillip [_ Forbes Thomas R. McAlieeter Edward P Lemons Perr~ R. Louck Ltnds M. FroRose McCormick Ksdmsn October 31, 1991 RECEIVED NOV f 3 991 /m'd. ........... Mr. Richard Ayala City of Temecula Planning Department 43180 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Water Availability Vesting Tract Map 26941 Dear Mr. Ayala: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Water availability would be Contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Senga Doherty. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNiA WATER DISTRICT Steve Brannon, P. E. Manager of Development Enginee.ring SB:SD:ajth269 cc: Senga Doherty, Engineering Technician , , Fduscbu Cali~ WNA, r ;/l~6l DsazR4acl , PostOflsceBosgOI7 * Teme:uka.(.;ahlarma9~49.6017 , 1714)676.4101 , FAXff|41;6.0615 J ATTENTK~N Of Office of ~"~e Chief DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY LOg ANOILI~ O~STI~. C~ ~ lr~r lr~i December 4, 1991 Taylor Woodrow Homes 4921 Birch Street #110 Hewpot% Beach, California 92660 Gentlemen: It has come to our attention-'that you plan to construct a housing development, South of Paube Road and West of Via Del Monte in the City of Temecula, Riverside County, California. A grading and drainage plan for the Crowne Hill Estates site (Tentative Tract #26941) prepared by Ranpac Engineering CorPoration. indicates several possible "waters of the US" which will be impacted by y r proposed development. This activity may ou require a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit. A Corps of Engineers permit is required for: 1. Work or structures in or affecting the "navigable waters of the United States,,, including adjacent wetlands; construction of a pier, wharf, bulkhead .or jetty, dredging, dredge disposal, filling and excavation are examples ofwork or structures affecting navigable waters; 2. The discharge of dredged or fill material into the "waters of the United States,,, including adjacent wetlands; placing bank. protection, temporary or Permanent stock-piling of excavated material, grading roads, any grading (including vegetative clearing operations) involving filling low areas or leveling the land, and construction of weirs, diversions, approach fills or other structures involving the placement of fill material are examples of activities involving the discharge of dredged or fill material; 3. The transportation of dredged or fill material for the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters; 4. Any combination of the abo~e.-. · Enclosed you will find a permit application form and a pamphlet that describes our regulatory program. If you have any questions, please contact Antal Szijj of my staff at (213) 894- 5606. Please refer to ~his letter in your reply. Enclosures Sincerely, Jonathan R. Freedman Chief, Southern Section cf: David James, Ranpac Eng. Corp. Saied Nasseh, City of Temecula, Planning Dept. TEMECULA VALLEY Unified Scboel District SUPERINTENDENT December 3, 1992 RECEIVED DEC O; 1992 CITY 0;' TEM F. CUL.A BOARD OF EDUCATION Dr. Dav:O Eur:c~ Ros:e Van~lerhaa JOin F. SDa~n ~ Wa~ S~ City of Temecula 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 Attention: Mr. Craig Ruiz Re: Tentative Tract Map 26941, CZ No. 22 Dear Mr. Ruiz, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above referenced tentative tract map. We would like .to provide the following information concerning the Crowne Hills Estate Lots. IT has been brought to our attention that the private roads contain sidewalks only on one side of the street. Since the safety of school children walking to and from school is a primary concern of the school district, we therefore request That sidewalks be provided for both sides of the street. Thank you for your time and cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, Temecula Valley Unified School District 31350 Rancho Vista Roacl / Temecul8, CA 92592 / (714) 676-2661 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 EXHIBITS cITY OF TEMECULA · . I N *:.°°'%°' N.T.S. CASE NO.: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 EXHIRIT: A P.C. DATE: January 4, 1993 R:~'ISTAF'FIqIrT~OI41Vll,4.PC: 12/29/92 Idb CITY OF TEM!~CULA r-- CASE NO.: Vesting Teamfive Tract Map No. 26941 EXmRIT: g DRAFT GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION P.C. DATE: January 4, 1993 · - . R:'L%"t, STAFFRPT'k28141V'rM.PC 12129/92 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO.: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 EXtHBIT: C P.C. DATE: January 4, 1993 SWAP MAP R:'t"'%'~AFFRIml~2814'lVlld. PC:: 121211~2 Idb CITY OF TE1VIECULA // CASE NO.: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 EXHIBIT: D P.C. DATE: January 4, 1993 ZONING MAP R:~"TAFFF!Irr~eMIVTM-PC 12/29/~2 kJb CITY OF TEMECULA VF,,Sr~G TENTATnrE TRACT MAP NO. 26941 ~ - / tT""""'t :"1" -~. "'~,'//.' . ~ ~ p~. '- . .,.~.. -':if' .-k.' : .,---;. Crowne Hill CASE NO.: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 EXHmIT: E VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 26941 P.C. DATE: January 4, 1993 R:~'XSTAFFRIrr~I941VTM.PC 12/21/12 Idb CITY OF TEMECULA CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 22 CASE NO.: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 EXHIBIT: F CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 22 P.C. DATE: January 4, 1993 R:~AFFRIrI"'~e941VTM.PC 12129/92 kib CITY OF TEMECULA REVISED VESTING TENTATI~/'E TRACT MAP NO. 23143 Crowne Hill CASE NO.: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 EXHIBIT: G VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23143 P.C. DATE: January 4, 1993 R:',,Sk~TAFFRPT'~e141VTM.pC 12/21/'B2 ldl} ATTACHMENT NO. 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT. N0. 230 35 : R:IJ~'TAFFRPT'~qfe41VTM.pC 12/30/92 kJb ATTACHMENT NO. 3 EXHIBITS 27 ', R:~Sl'STAFFRI~aI41V'TM.leC 12/30tl2 CITY OF TEMECULA eeee ee N °% T~:"..... ..:, :"' r ' i '~ ~ * f~'' '-" ' ' .' : ' ,* *** %***% ~.,,\," N.T.S. CASE NO.: Vesting Teamfive Tract Map No. 25941 EXHIRIT: A P.C. DATE: January 4, 1993 _ R:~$'rAI=FRleT~$I41V'rM.PC 12/29/$2 CITY OF TEMECULA .) CASE NO.: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 ~:XF~XT: B DRAFt GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION P-C. DATE: January 4, 1993 · ' R:~ilb"TAFFRPT'L26941VTM.PC 12/29f92 kt CITY OF TE]VIECULA CASE NO.: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 EXHIBIT: C P.C. DATE: January. 4, 1993 SWAP MAP " R:~"~'~'rAFFIImT'~/141V'T'M.PC 12/28/92 Idb cut o~ T~~C~A CASE NO.: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 EXHIBIT: D P.C. DATE: January 4, 1993 ZONING MAP r R:~Sli'TAFFRP1~eI41VTM.pC 12/2lf82 Idb c~~ o~ V]~MECt~A ~,.~ ~ ----1~.~ TRACT MAP NO. 26941'---' '~"'~~':~ I - CASE NO.: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 EXHmlT: E VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 26941 P.C. DATE: January 4, 1993 R:~%'TAItltlqlrr~26M1VTM.PC 12/29/92 Idb c~v o~ ~~Ct~A CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 22 CASE NO.: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 EXmaIT: F CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 22 P.C. DATE: January 4, 1993 R:'~LSXSTAFFRPT%2e$4"IVTIVI.P{2 12121/92 Idb CITY OF TEMECULA TRACT MAP NO. 23143 -- . .~ ,';' .~ ....: . : ~'. ,. , ,~.' .; '-~ .-,~-., --._ - _: ~.,: _ :, : .-._-.~ · ,... '2-__-:?- .- , ,-~_--. %~rowne Hill CASE NO.: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 EXmntT: C VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23143 P.C. DATE: January 4, 1993 : R:~q~"TAFFRPl'~eI41VTM.pC 12129/'82 Idb ee ATTACHMENT NO. 5 ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 230 36 R:I%STA~IVTM.pC 12/30/82 klb ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 230 The Riverside County Board of Supervisors certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 230 in conjunction with the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23143. The EIR included mitigation measures to reduce environmental impacts to levels of insignificance. Environmental Impact Report No. 230 wee originally prepared for Specific Plan No. 229, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23143 (Crowns Hill) and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22430. Subsequently Specific Plan No. 229 end Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22430 were withdrawn from conmderation. Vesting Tentative Tract Map 23143 and an Addendue to EIR No. 230 were approved by the Temecula City Council in August of 1990. The area that comprises Vesting Tentative Tract Map N0. 26941 (Crowns Hill EstateS) is a remainder parcel of Vesting Terrtative Tract Map No. 23143, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941, with minor exceptions to the circulation pattern and the removal of six acres from the northeast corner of the map, is unchanged from the original project that was approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, The modified circulation pattern end removal Of the northeast corner of the map will not result in any new or increased significant impacts. The Conditions of Approval are adequate to mitigate any potential significant impacts to levels of insignificance. Pursuant to Section 15164 of the California Environmental Quality Act, this addendue has been IDrepared to demonstrate that the changes resulting from the proposed Change of Zone No. 22 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26941 will not result in new or substantially increased significant impacts, that there have been no changes in the circumstances surroundIng the IDroject That would require important revisions to the EIR due to new s~gnlfican~ ~rnlDacts, and that no new information has arisen which would indicate that the project will have significant effects not previously discussed or underestimated, or that alternatives or mitigation measures not previously considered would substantially reduce any s~gnificam ~ml~acts. By modifying the proposed circulation and removing six acres from the northeast corner of the map the revised project will not increase the level of impacts on the environment and on public facilities and services. 37 ** R:IIlITAIq~Bi1V11k!.IwC 12/30/12 Idb ATTACHMENT NO. 6 VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 26941 R:I~STAFF'RP~28841 .CC 611 7/~3 klb I i L....I,,; ,r-.,,.~...,.,,..~ :.. ""'T',.' ' ..::~, ':,.:' :..: '~ .'- -.. '..;1 ' ~. .: .,.; ;;,-:- ..... . . . , ,, I~,' ~ -= -.'., . · . , - . "~"",."~...il4 "" '- ':':">. :::":::"~-: ,. "' :T:/'- :..,.'~...i\..%:.._. h,~ i~'~. ,:- . · . -:.. -. :, .- .: .. :-,:-.... ._.L._.~, - ' .. 'd~"- .,..~:,,-: . . -.:.~:,; "" · · ; .. . i I -_i-:~ .... __ ;. :-'.-__, .~_~._. . -' .-:.'....'T-~.-.. . ," ... : _: .' .. -.. .__...--n~;. .t, ' ,! o' · .~_... .....~.~--~;.._ - .- /, 4 ~-" "~ """' ~"" ---:~" '~ · t "'~ '~~- / .~' '. ,r"z."' ": . ,:~...,. -., · .' .>, .,, '. - ',,,\.-~ . .' _. "' ':':" "~ ""~"''; ""'" ~4 'TM' t.-, '-:-"'-:.--.-~- ' .'-~- p ';,.-"' .,,.. , : ~ !' ~/ ~ ~iI ~ ;i.~' :~- : H .~..~'q, ' ATTACHMENT NO. 7 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 230 R:~S~STAFFRPT'~26941 .CC 5117/93 Idb ISSUES & CONCt~,RNS The CrowneHil] Project PAUBA RANCHOS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION % Mission Realty 337 E Mission Road Fallbrook, CA 92028 Ray Crain, Property Manager Phone 909.6993344 Fax 619..79_3.1725 TO: FROM: RE: ' DATE: The City of Temecula Planning Ci:}mmission & The Temecula City Council Pauba Ranchos Homeowners Association Tract Maps No. 26941 known as Crownchill Estates; 23143 'known as Crownchill Development January 28th, 1993 The Pauba Ranchos community is located at the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road and Pauba Road in Temecula, Riverside County. There are one hundred twenty-eight lots (5 acre minimum) in our development containing an aggregate of approximately 700 acres. ' In the attached report we wish to express our concerns and raise questions on the projects referenced below. In addition, we desire to fuffill the documentation requirement of issues raised in the event the projects are challenged in court. We received a notice postmarked January 22nd, 1993, that a Public Hearing has been scheduled for February 1st, 1993 to hear comments from the public on Tract Map No. 26941. We have tried to respond appropriately in the limited time given. Since the developer and the city have chosen to reference and use the EIR report # 230 and Design Guidelines for Tract Map No. 23143 (Exhibit 1) and both maps are owned by the same developer and are part of a master traffic circulation design with similar legal issues and concerns along with possible misleading statements in EIR report # 230 used for both maps, i'eferences will be made to Conditions of Approval for both maps. We hope that you understand our concerns and can respond to 'our questions and then if allowed we'd like to open up dialogue with both the city and the developer to see if perhaps the concerns brought out in this summary can be resolved to the benefit of all parties before the City considers approval of this project. Sincerely, John M. Wayland Pauba Ranchos Homeowners Association ROADS : (Issue No. 1 ) Tract Map 23143 - A collector road (Crowne Hill Drive) will funnel' considerable traffic onto Pauba Road. Pauba Road is improved on the south side bordering tract map 23143. The north side is maintained by Pauba Ranchos Home Owners Association. In 1992 our counsel researched and determined that Pauba Ranchos Homeowners .Association and the 'homeowners along Pauba Road have both responsibility for maintenance and legal liability for the "half road'-and consequently all west bound traffic exiting this new project. Assessment District #159 improved the west side of Butterfield Stage Road. The east side of Butterfield Stage Road has been left to the Pauba Ranchos Homeowners Association to maintain and have legal liability for the half road along lots 1,2 and 3 of our community. It is well known that Butterfield Stage Road will be a major North/South corridor through the City of Temecula with thousands of cars a day traveling across this road to the new projects. (Exhibit 2 & 3) When Pauba Road was upgraded on the south side, Pauba Ranchos Homeowners Association's previously paved road was torn up and left as a dirt road for 8 months! Butterfield Stage was worse! When the paving was finished, traffic from the east, outside our association has come speeding through to get into town. We now refer to Pauba as the Pauba Expressway. Speeds of 55+ miles an hour are the norm in an area posted 25 miles an hour. (Exhibit 4) Speed limit signs have been posted at the homeowners expense but the city and the county refuse to patrol or ticket the violators, We've been told that Pauba is not the responsibility of either the city or the county. Question #1 Will the city provide enforcement for traffic violations on Pauba Road? Pauba Road narrows considerable at Via Del Monte then comes to a "half road" where our association has paved and maintained one side while the other side which is' out of our association is a 'mashboard" surface..Drivers heading east say a prayer. every time they approach a blind hill on this stretch of Pauba. Try it sometime. (Exhibit 5) The intersection of Via Del Monte and Pauba Road has two hills obstructing a driver's view preventing safe access on to Pauba Road even in light traffic. With the new volume of traffic, serious safety problems exist (Exhibit 6 & 7). A 6 acre park site at this location is part of the proposed development. The EIR report states these two projects will generate 11,210 car trips per day?'! Question #2 Is it the city's intention and policy Io "cost shift" maintenance and legal liabilities of the Crownehill project (cars exiting the project in either direction in addition to all cars approaching from the east) to the Pauba Ranchos Property Owners Association? .. Conditions'of Approval for Tract Map 23143, Page 1, Item 4 states that "Legal access as reauired by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract mad bounclarv to a City maintained road." Question #3 What exactly does '1o a city maintained" road mean? Conditions of Approval for Tract Map 23.143, Page 13, Item 70 states that "Vehicular access shall be restricted on Pauba Road, Butterfield Stage Road, and Crownehill Drive 'and so noted on the final map." Question #4 What does 'restricted mean? Conditions of Approval for Tract Map 23143, Page 16, Item 93 states that "Plans for a traffic signal shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works for the intersection of Crownehill at Pauba Road..." Conditions of Approval for Tract Map 23143, Page 17, Item 100 E states that "the striping plan for Pauba Road to include a left turn lane for CrowneHill Drive." Conditions of Approval for Tract Map 23143, Page 18, Item 107 states that "All traffic signals shall be installed and operational per the special provisions and the approved traffic signal plan when warranted but not later than issuance of occupancy for the final phase. Question #5 What is meant by the term "special provisions"? Question #6 If the City is so concerned about the need for a traffic signal why shouldn't we be concerned about the amount of traffic? Question #7 If the planning staff feels traffic through our association' roads will be minimal, why is there a need for a left hand turn lane (traffic would be traveling through our association's roads in order to turn left)? 3 Tract Map No. 26941 shows traffic entering and exiting onto Cee Cee Lane. From Cee Cee Lane, traffic would then need to go onto Orlinda and Ljnda Rosea or Lisa Rd to Via Del Monte past the Air Strip to Pauba Rd. (Exhibit 8 & 9) Ranpac Engineering Corporation Exhibit 111-7 shows a 13 acre elementary school along with a soccer and football field with access only through Tract Map No. 26941 and then onto Cee Cee Lane and then onto the traffic pattern mentioned above. (Exhibit 1 O) "E" Lina Street (Ranpac Exhibit 111-7) is shown on RanPac Exhibit 111-5 as a type C "Collector" street taking all traffic from the school to Cee Cee Lane. (Exhibit 1 O) CPD &':AssOciate's' Exhibit 9 displays "E' Ijna Street at Cee Cee. Lane as [3] Estate Lot ENTRY Monumentation. (Exhibit 11) ' Again these roads have been built, maintained and legal liability assumed by our homeowners association. As you can see by the pictures, these roads are not designed for the increased traffic of the homes and an elementary school. (Exhibit 12,13,14,15) Our community is designed as a rural country area of large 5 acre equestrian lots and the property .owners have a.definite aversion to street light pollution and therefore no roads in our association have street lights. -- Question #8 Does the City feel it is safe for cars filled with' school children and their parents to exit evening school gatherings and sporting events onto the streets shown in the exhibits that even in daylight would be subject to accidents and in the darkness of night .... ? (Not to mention traffic passing across an airstrip at night with no street lights.) Cee Cee Road, Linda Rosa, Lisa Road and Via Del Monte are PRIVATE ROADS. The Statement the Planning Department's Staff Report is incorrect (Exhibit 16). The county has not accepted dedication for public use or accepted these roads into the County Maintained Road System. Apparently the County cannot even find records that an offer was ever made. In addition we are investigating with the County of Riverside Resolution No. 89-251. The resolution states that Pauba will not become part of the County Maintained Road System (Exhibit 17). Since the apparent acceptance of dedication was initiated by Assessment District 159 (Exhibit 17) for the Crownehill project we feel a tremendous legal jeopardy has been forced upon us. No public hearing was performed and no record of this offer for dedication could be found in the County Records. The land was simple taken. We are still pursuing this matter. A homeowners residential policy even specifically excludes Pauba as it now is arranged. (Exhibit 18) Question #9 Does a government agency have the right to compel the taking of land, while forcing private property owners to pay for maintenance and be held liable for the same.land? Question #10 How can this project have legal access to It's major entry over private streets? ' · Legally our association and the property owners are liable for lawsuits involving cur roadways. We can not afford to self insure this risk. We must go out into the commercial insurers market and attempt to secure liability insurance. Liability insurers go through cycles of hard and soft markets. We've already experienced difficulty purchasing insurance and with the tremendous exposure brought on by the city, the county and the developer we will either be forced to pay substantially higher premiums or even risk · being uninsurable. Question #11 Does. the. city plan on assuming any or all of this. risk? Local newspapers in Temecula Valley continually run stories of traffic problems being brought before the City Council. These problems usually involve neighborhoods having traffic from new developments taking short cuts and endangering people and pets. Solutions to date include construction of barriers in the middle of the street (pitting neighbor against neighbor) or the response "We'll study the problem" while requesting traffic officers to step up patrols. (Exhibit 19) Surely steps to prevent the problem in the first place would be safer and less expensive for the city. Question #12 What steps has the City taken to avoid these traffic problems with the Crownehill Project. Crownehill provides access all the way through to the .east and Cee Cee Lane. The gate at Cee Gee Lane seems to prevent access to the school and the project to the west. Gated communities have seen an increase in lawsuits recently. The homeowners association contained within the gates might feel compelled to eliminate the gates or lose liability insurance coverage. Question #13 What assurances can the city give that this gated entry will restrict traffic in the future? Equestrian Trails (Issue No. 2) Tract Map No 26941 is being presented as large "estate" lots with a focus on equestrian pursuits. However, the only horse trail shown in the maps is along Cee Cee Lane going off to the south over other private property owner's land. While there may be additional trails we could not locate them in any materials given to us. There is a rendering showing a horse trail along Pauba which will be addressed in Issue No. 3 Question #14 Does Crownehill Estates have legal equestrian easements in their CC & R's and with the private property owners to the south of their project? At the January 4th, 1993 puDlic meeting, Ernest Egger of Trans-Pacific Consultants made the statement that it was their. hope that we would use their trails??? in Crownehill and Crownehill owners could therefore use our trails. Question #15 Crownehill Estates appears to be a "gated" community. Will passes or gate entry keys be handed out to our association members to ride inside their neighborhood ? Question #16 While we'd love to be neighborly to fellow horse lovers, will Crownehill help maintain our trails and how will we address the issue of liability if a home steps in a gopher hole, etc and throws a rider resulting in an injury on our property? ' In simpler times this may not have ben an issue. The reality today is that we live in a society that sues at the drop of a hat. Homeowner's in our community sign CC & R's agreeing that property owners in our association will have an equestrian easement. The association could not legally force a property owner to allow a non association member from going across their individual properties. A reciprocal agreement would be very challenging. The placement of an equestrian community with limited trails on their own property, but bordering our' private property of over 700 acres would most likely result in illegally trespassing and conflicts. Trails Alonq Pauba Road nssue No. 3) One of the conditions of Tract Map No. 23143 is an equestrian trail along the north side Pauba Road. An artist rendering was'used for Crownehill showing a turf parkway, shrub buffer zone, three rail equestrian fence and an equestrian trail and so forth (Exhibit 20). LaDeled "Pauba Street Scene" it is a marked contrast to the recent grading of less than 1/2 the amount of space shown in the rendering: Question #17 What is the reality going to be? EIR Report nssue No. 4) Page 158 of EIR Report #230 states that the Pauba Ranchos Estates Association have supported the Crownehill project (Exhibit 21). The only letter on file from our association is (Exhibit 22). Question #18 Does the City interpret our letter as a letter of support??? 6 Parking' for Park Site "A" ( ssue No. Park Site "A' at the corner of V~a Del Monte and Pauba Road shows no parking spaces. {Exhibit 23) Question #19 Since this is labeled a "public" park, where will the public 'park their automobiles? Question #20 Will there be lighting at this park and ff so what type? Question #21 Will there be .fencing at this site? ff so, what type and color? Question #22 What type of facilities will be installed at the park? Private Air Strip Easement (Issue No. 6} EIR Report #230 page 129 #13-states project will "encourage mitigation of land to protect Pauba Ranchos Air Strip". Question #23 What specific steps will be taken to "encourage" and "mitigate"? Question #24 Will there be specific disclosure statements signed by home buyers in this project? Question #25 If so, what will the wording be? Question #26 Will there be disclosure that planes taking off will be at only 700 feet when going over Crownehill and' the planes may not have mufflers? Question #27 Isn't there a state law limiting high density housing within 2 miles of any airport ? Street Lightinc (Issue No. 7) The project conditions state street lights every 300 feet. We are very concerned about the impact of this project on the night sky and the rural atmosphere of our neighborhood. Question #28 in January of 1991, Taylor Woodrow representatives stated they would ask the city for a variance to reduce lighting. What is the status of that request? Question #29 What type of special considerations were given to Los Ranchitos and Santiago Estates for limited street lighting? Question #30 What type of lighting will be installed at the football field thatborders the east side of this project up agai. nst our homes? . Construction, Marketina Sians & Flags (Issue No. 8) We appreciate the need for the developer to advertise this project, but there is concern that the project will have large fluorescent banners proclaiming 'No Mello Roos" and "Homes from $XXX,999", etc. along our streets giving a carnival appearance to the area. Since it appears the Butterfield Stage Road entrance will be the main sales operation, we would appreciate signs, flags and banners to be limited to the entrance on Butterfield Stage Road. Question #31 Can we receive assurances in wrtUng that signs will not be placed along Pauba Road or the east side of the project? Construction equipment is noisy and extremely heavy. Since our roads have a thin layer of asphalt, heavy equipment would deteriorate our road side. It appears that Pauba Ranchos may be come the 'back door' for construction traffic for Crownehi!l. Question #32 Where will heavy equipment and construction traffic access this project? City's General Plan Area. Land Use (Issue No. 9) Evic~ently the city has no '~ransition" rule ( increments of 1/2 the surrounding lot sizes) which is found prudent in other cities.' It is a apparent with this project that a transition rule would be of great benefit in mitigating the harshness of going from 5 acres (43,560 x 5 acres = 217,800 square foot) lots directly to 7500 and 9000 square foot lots along the north side! 217,800 divide into 7500 equals 29 dwellinas per 5 acre lot versus I dwelling per 5 acre immediately next to this project. Tract Map# 26941 will have 10, 5 and 2 1/2 acres right next to 6000 foot lots. Temecula's City Manager is trying ways to be successful and competitive with other cities in attracting new business and residents to the area. ADoroDriate and attractive land mix would seem important! People come to Temecula for a varieW of reasons. Evidently one big reason (Both developers and the city use this as a major promotion angle) is a semi rural atmosphere. This project is not well planned as it relates to the transition to 5 acre equestrian lots. Rather the project squeezes the most out of a parcel of land with no considerations to the citizens of the surrounding community. When home buyers came to our neighborhood, the land that this project is on was zoned for 5 acres. Then aJong came the Swap map changing the land to 2 to 4 dwelling per acre. (Exhibit 24) ' Now the Citv's general plan shows the area as 3 to 6 units per acre! (Exhibit 25) · Yet the staff report on this project says 'At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines.' (Exhibit 26) Question #33 What prompted the City to furrier Increase the density of this area? Question #34 Who requested this increased density? Question #35 When a zoning change like this takes place is there a requirement to notify the surrounding landowners within 300' of the land in question by mail? North Side of CrowneHill Project (Exhibits 28 and 29) (Issue No. 10) In the planning staffs report for Tract Map #26941 it is stated that 'this project will provide a buffer between CrowneHill Development which is composed of 5,000 and 6.000 sc~uare foot lots to the west and the lame lots to the east." (Exhibit 27) Question # 351f its important to provide this type of buffer on the east side, why is a similar buffer not necessary on the north side where the project abuts the same size lots? When Crownehill Tract Mz~p # 23143 came up for review in August of 1992, the city responded to inquiries about the buffer areas along Pauba. We weFe told that we had requested the areas to be left in a "natural" state. The letter from our association to the city (Exhibit 22) dated January 21, 1991 does not concur with the city's statement. When researched, we found a consensus of our association members that a meeting on this project was held at Rancho Water District by Ranpac principals. several years ago. At that meeting RanPac stated lots along the north side of the project would not even be seen due to the fact the homes would be built behind the existing natural ridge line. Based on that premise, several members stated at that time, that leaving the area as it is in a natural state would be preferable since we wouldn't even be able to tell the homes were there. However, the tract maps keep changing and now the reality is much different. Statements by the developer and recollections by property owners and association board members have been.conflicting and confusing.. Question #36 What documents are available through the city, county and the developer that would help shed light on this matter In the conditions of approval statements are made that the project will "blend with hillside topography." Several articles in local newspapers tell about hills being built uo next to existing properties much to the dismay of adjoined property owners. ' Question #37 What is the extent of the grading for homes that border the nodh and east side of Crownehill? · Above Ground Utilities (Issue No. 11 ~ Condition #34 states that utilities less than 33kv will be installed underground. Page 124 of the EIR report states project will need to have a "major" electrical line extended from Rancho California Road south to the project. Question #38 Will above ground utilities be installed to this project? Question #39 If yes, what path will this utilities take? Impact on Property Values (Issue No. 121 Just as the city must put it's best foot forward in attracting interest in new residents, so must existing property owners hope that they too can compete with surrounding areas. Potential buyers looking in our area will be looking for the same things we did we moving here in the heart of the Wine Country. A rural atmosphere, no street lights, low density and a place to engage in equestrian pursuits. These buyers will not be interested . in traffic and liability concerns, or an "Orange County" tract look. While it is not the city's place to guaranty property values, nor should it encourage projects and land use that will depreciate existing homeowner's land values. It could be argued what effect this project will have on property values, but it was best saicl at a meeting on May 20th, 1991 when asked why custom homes on 1 acre or larger lots weren't put in as buffer to our 5 acre lots, "Who would want to buy a custom home next to a bunch of tract homes... ? ! ' This statement was made by Sharon Slocum along with David Zaminski both representatives of Taylor Woodrow Homes. Since they are employees with a large real estate development firm (Taylor Woodrow) with years of professional experience, we respect their commentary. - _t t I ~' I I I I leROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING I, AND USE: SURROUNDING Rezi~en~i ~. 2.5 Ecru minimum Io~ me (R-A-2½) end Re,k~nUal AFicunm. Secre enmmmum M~ me (R-A-S) Noflh: ' Vacant End Cu~om One Farolay Dwellings Sotam: Vm ~ VecanT and Cureore One FImiiy Dwellings We~: Vacalm .PROJECT FTA'II~fiCS Number of im 28 ToTal Aml i 33,00 " Average limrcel ,iZe 4.7S Minimum lot m 2..50 Groll Oenl~y 0.21 import 1 lACKGROUND aweling ~ Imr we ceicyeral Vetoing Tema~ive Tra~ k N0.21tll is a mmam~g of Drevimmiy 812p~oved yet never recD~e(t miD. 'The Mevioudy 8Ill'Dyed Vetoing Temliv~ EIR No. 230, DeveloDmem Agreement, No. 26 end Design Guidelirm were aDDroved by A:vere'de County loan of ~ in August of 1918, FIIQJEC'r DeeCRllrriON The eoDlicanz is mq~ng e~,,-c-~41 To _--__,,~_Mlte 133 8~'es into 21 Griturn single llmily loll. The io~J will very m ~ze fr,m 2.5 aGneS te 10.6 acres. The ~',iect is zllecl R-A-5 end R-A- 2 ½. DevelollmerK Agreement No. 26 and me Deign Guidelines m~T were Dreviously aDDroveD with Vesang TemTw~ Tract MaD No. 23 1 43 l_11~y to veoting Tamlive Trac~ Map No. 26941. Ti~e Oroie~ site lies within two ,Dning dismcll. R-A-S end R-A-2 ½. The remasT for zone cMnge will change lhe zmng to CmlfOrm wire me cles~gn 8.9. I 2. I 3.17, 18.26.27 end 28 will (mange from R-A-S to R-A-2 ½ end · ~fTJon of 4 will cringe from R-A-2 ½ to R-A-S. Tl~e eastern DOleson of ~ OrDerly is cufferITty located witch me 100-vear flood Diein end comprises eDOrox~metely 9.5 acres. The 100 Year fiDocl Diem runs end 1C}. The Oroject has ilxen condmoned to er~ure mat tl~s oo~t~on of Prooerly Dreeen~lcl Is oDen eolce incl no structures will IX lllowecl iretit 11 and 16). Exhibit I Exhibit 2 ExhiDit 3 ExniDit 5 Exhibit 7 C AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA J ELEMENTARy SCHOOL AND PARK SITE ilNIIl~ L, caiiv~: lo MONUMENTATTON PLA~ Exbiblt 11 Exhibit Exhibit 15 2. There is rm~ a likely Ixol~bili~y at sul~smrmm ~emmen~ ~'s ~e ~MQI ~n. ~ ~o~ m m ~ ~e~ w~ ~ ~A. wehm ~il im~ Me ~n megilK ~ a bed of ~ce. ?. h~ G~s ere ~ ~ m~, ~H, ~ K ~r~i d~ems Ae~. ~ro~na~ ~ ~ A~ ~ ~m~ of AW~eI. ~ts re~de~ I~ I~ia~ ~1 a~ ~r~l/ 6~Z.3) I~ h~s ~t ~ ~o;~ ae~ a Gonetel Pllfi. AadltlfilJy, It will ~ae m~e to ~ re,ainu of ~ ~ Of Te~c~a. g. ~ WoD~ Drom~ will not reset in d~rge af we~e into ~ e~n~ Nwer SYstem ~t m in ~l~ Of ~ reQ~remen, as fit ~ m ~on 13~0 el nQ. of T~ ~lifO~l Water CHI ~ reQ~n~ ~ ~o~c: to c~Diy w~ batera M~;DiI Water ~ff~'l rlQuereme~s. 10. ~e des~;~ of ~e ~Ddi~mon Dro~es to the I~1~ telse~e. tar t~re ~Ueve or ~itgrll ~ltl~g or cooling ODDO~Un~T~eS m ~e sg9a~wsa~ (Gay. C~i Sedan 66473.1 } by hmmng ~e ~etgm of ~ future structures to 32 feet and roegang ~tDaCKS 8c~oraf~ to ~e Re,GeniTal Agr~culture (R-A) StartaltOS. 11 T~ DrOeeCT ~IS iCCIDTa~I ICCISS by means of aed:~ated Cona:Tmned ~o ~ve slconal~ ICC15S from VeStrag Tlntlta~ Tr/~ MID No. 23143. Amendment NO. 5 tot ~e ~cessiry fig~t-ot-wly Exhibit 16 ~ Illmletlen Is. II-Ii|, ic~ltt81 effetE InsFlu xiiaus~'Tzo~ no. s,-zsi lose ISle AttiCillS k. 3.4, l, & &) Slid re~l are in the ~nty If liversLee, lists el M~3II : '" ~*. ,. No, ss or h,,i Me,, ,u Ezhibit 17 C ALTA RESZDENTZAL POLZC'Y POLZCY NO. SC3tZ:DULE · I:XCZZPrZONS ZN ADDZTZON T0 ~ I:ZC::LUSZONS, YOU ARE NOT 'rNSURED AGATNST LOSS, COSTS, AT?OIUqE~S' TT~,S, AND EXPENSES P.T, SULTZNG 1. GENERAL AN~ SpBeuZAZ, COUNTY TAXES FOR TKE FESTAL YEAR 199X-~2, A L3:EN NO? l~r PAYABLE, 2. TrrE L3:~T OF SU~PLB4ZNTAL TAXES, :F AN~, ASSESSED PURSUANT C~L~B 3.5 ~CZNG W:~ SEC~ZON ?S or ~ CALZFOKN:A .AND TAXATZON :CODE. 3. NUi~ZCZPJ~T, Z~PROVEM~Irr BOND, FZLLrD ZN THE OFFZOE 'OF THE TI~SUI~E3t OF ~: COUIr/~.OF XZVZRSZDE. BO~D AJ~OU~T S2,530.40. 4. AN EASEMENT FOR THE HZREZNAFTER SPECZFZC PURPOSE · AND ZNCZDk'WrAL pUlW~ES, ZN PAVOK OF C:/U~ES T. LEAVZ~T, ET AL, ZN ZNSTRTJ~ENT P~CORDE~ APRZL 28, :967 AS ZNSTRU~ENT NO. 36275; DEC~v:BEX 29, lg67 AS ZNSTRUMZ3r: NO. ::5255; ~ ::, :968 AS ZNSTRUM~N? NO. 54~857 A~ST 28, ~968 ~ ZNSTR~ NO. 83536; DECHER 3Z, ~968 · ~ ZNS~ NO. ~2732~ ~S OF XZ~ZDE ~, ~ZFO~A. S~D ~ ZS FOR ~WA~, PZP~Z~, ~LZC ~ZLZTZ~ ~. :NCD~ P~POSES, ~ ~ BE LO~ ~ ~ ~CO~S. S. AN EASEMENT FOR THE HZREZNAFTER SPECZFZC PURPOSE A~D ZNCZDE~ ~OS~, ~ SX~ ON A P~ ~ OF SAZD L~, FZLE ZN BOOK 5 PGS ? ~OU~ ~: OF P~ ~S, UCO~S OF RZVERSZDE CO~, C~:FORNIA. SAZD EASEMENT ZS FOR ROADS, SLOPES, D~:~ ~ ~LZC ~ZLZTZES, 6. ~N~S, ~ZTZONS ~ ~S~Z~ZONS ZN DO~ F~RU~y 23, :972 ~ :NSTR~ ~. 23~B3 OF OFFZCZ~ ~CO~S OF RZ~RSZDE ~, ~ZFO~, ~ D~ZNG ~STR:~ZONS ZF · ASED UPON RACE, COLOR, RELZGZON OR NATZONAL ORZGZN, ~g?? AS ZNSTR~E~ NO. 97699 FOR P~aL ~p BOOK THROUGH :~ OF P~ ~ ~ ~ ~y 27, ~?? AS ZNSTR~ NO. g??:? ~ p~ ~ ZN B~K 4 PAGG 62 T~OUGH ~. B~TH DF OFFZCZ~ RECO~S OF RZVERSZDE CO~. ~CH PROVZDE T~T A VZOLATZON T~OF S~L NOT DE~T OR Z~ZD THE LZE~ OF ~ FZRST MORTGAGE OR DE~ OF TRUST ~OD FAZTH ~ FOX V~. ~SO, ~ ~5~ O~X SA:D THE HEREZNA~ER SPECZFZC P~POSE ~ ZNC:D~ P~XP~SES, AS SET F~TH ZN THE DO~ ~ ~ZONED. SA:D EASE~E~ ~S F~R R~ADS. SLOPES. DRAINAGE, DRAiNAgE FAC~LZTZES. ALTA RES:DENTZAL POLICY POL:C'Y. NO. 17. AbT AGENCY AGREEMENT DATZ~ FEBRUABy 20, :987 BY A~D BETWEEN LARRY L. GIBSON, INC. AND ILANCHO CA.LIFOItt4ZA WATER DISTR::T NHEREXN ZT ZS AGREED THAT SAZD DZSTRZCT :S DESZGNATED AS EXCLUSZV'[ AGENT FOR ~ EXTRACT:ON. DZVXRSZON, STORAGE, BLEh'DZNG AJ~D D,I:STR.ZBUTZON OF ALL LOCAL WATER, REC~RDZ~D APRZL 23, :98? AS ZNSTR~/N'T NO. :llg:e oF OFFZCZA.T, RECOKDS QF RZVERSZDE COUNT~.', CA,LZFOI~;XA. 18. THE EFFE, CT OF A RESOLUTION BY THE RIVERSIDE COUNT~ BOAR) OF SLrPERVISORS ACCEPTING SAID OFFER OF DEDZCATZON FOR TEE PURPOSE OF VESTING TITLE IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ON BEHALF OF TEE PUBLIC, BU'T NOT AS PART OF THE COLrNT~f-MAZNTAZNED ROAD SYSTEm, RECOKD_~a JUNE 26, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 211059 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTer, CAIIFOR/qIA. Exhibit 18 Roads will not be closed, but controls to be better Nlmlolml~mor~lope_-,- Hu~ ~ ~ me ~ ~e 'V~. ,'s a one m Mo mmme ~. bu( ~'t (fie gf~ Of ~r All Ot till rliMla~ Ilowlvlr, will Ilol lit AtloaPlct. wllo llvlmofi Del Rey iloa~NdcJamnlCNl~PmaCo* ada eraaid ONF metn mote Irene for Its litIlL "we don't nt, ml uy mor~ Irl~c.' Plce stud. 'we Cs~PmsCSsa~". Al~msxety IJO0 ~ of ISXeNS~ effec~ of me IIO!IM~VIBICIIII~Ma-: averaJe of 'JlO nortlll,ound* IIIrOUlA-IfIIM wOgld m mve~mi I~ T~e Im~ Slernl~e mute meltroe Del Re,/I~ 5~fu Way ~ Avlmal kr~L · '.. . it m ex'~r~mely aimcult ~ IZlZlClplle me NlerlilDve 4nvefi may Tale once their pre- ~err'ecI/'ogle LS ctole(3 . ." ~ Tam Series, ~re~tor of Pubixc worn. kcatme of me attuc~ram~ Irtf. tic Cllver!lOft 14 I rllul( Of ~e claur.. Setter urle~ Cl~ Conre:ft. ffief~Der$ to Llxe ..pq, c restrictive- measures m a~evmte me concerns: ot me Calle Pma Coil resineros'-The Qry Co~ac~J air~. Some of me Sertel's measure cN! for' m.~.ll Exhibit 19 C ! I I I Exhibit 20 lte'm~'ovAe-'l o'~ "C~o Pau. ba itanc~os F..s~ar. es p.-o'~ ec:. have su~pc,~ed ~,he Bu,-:,am,'~a~d pro3ec~. 3tavj.ev o~ T,~s ac ncmaovnt_-s, assocAac.torA mee,~.~fs :ut.L.Ite~ j.n · A~. s'~ppa,-~, of ~,Ao p=o~ec-,. C~nca,-ns of 'C~.e :ccAse~ on lares use compa:',bili=y and p:o~ec: des~Vm. ~: u~ese conce:~s ve:e resolved =o ?,is 8a-,j,s,dac-,ion hcmeovne_-a an~ re,elec-,sd in :,ms praise-, cku',Vn ~,-,vQlve~' Win~u~ lot a'-es a,' ~;e xr~ one ~al,' . ac.-es amd ~ve CS) acres An Plamm~; A:ea 4, a. ne su.-.':'c,:A.-.c~An,:; homao~ers As noc anticipated due 'co l::ro~e~ ~esA~n vrx.tC.~ has been m~i~._~.ed i~ response :~ c--.--:t,-r_s ~,- ?,~xe l, au~a hACAOS aomeov~a,-s Assoc~auio~. Exhibi~ 21 ' ''~ P.O. Box 2~5 Temecula, CA 92390 ~s n ~ mr. h~orco~ u ~be s~cb t~d Uuc~trfiald bad ~ the ~e~. ~2 o~ Saccortland Soaps h~ee ~ec~ ~lfo~ had and ?cube D~scr~c~. It sam t~t g~ road vi~ be f~F cm~eged by l~/g~ nu~ay. of ~7 f~oo~2. hey ~ ~ ~t ,at ~g ~l to Bet the Job done ~yI~I--NO ~ur~ber ~gi~ on our pa~ ~&ept as noraeaTs. · brlXh: s~r pa:ttn slant a black s~. ~aylor Voodr~ has a~wetd eeoc edit. ~ey ~a~ ~r~de~ I "~Z LO~' b~fe:. bessart cheer ~ropo~ea ~lng c~ roads and a ~! green area be~ore metal a ~oC:C~O~. ~e5 asked vby chef put tht~: "~GZ LC:" b~fe:. they values. ~c ~u~d ~ke to see an adsqueue bu~!er sod a blanctnl o~ nc le~s~ o~e acre ~ l~xa, ~ch ~ace Cht nor~:. P.C, Box 2~5 Tomecull, CA 923J0 ~.~porc: RJ.~h densleT ho~es encroac~.~2 on siTper-.- Ice not any a~orc. bqvesz ct~ to lnvo~ s:~e T~e prrpart~/ perhaps on a ~ced ,~'hank-Fo~ Exhibit ~ch~bi~ .D CITY OF TEM'F, CULA CASE NO.: Vesting Ten:a~ive Trac: Map No. 26941 E,TgrrBIT: C P.C. DATE: Januar7 4, 1993 S~'A.P ~L4J' Exhibit 24 (- Draft Preferred i~/."" Land Use Plan ! ' t,,, ! I -" ' ~ --- -i C"- mm ................ The City TEMECULA General Plan Program Exhibit 25 j guidelines while the C~ is l~xmdmg in · mely h~,,,,~ wire me pnt=m'dnon or ~ ~ C. Th= Planning Ce,,,,ei,-k,n h, P,',,,-,,,,-,dhg alqxv~ of mid apptica~ns mak=s rJg foUowmg r,--dh,~, m Wit: ClmnltofZdmeNo. 2~ I. Then= is a muombk pmixbilit7 tint Change of 7..zme No. 22 will be ~°nsistentwi~me CitY'sfum~C.~,--,,IPlan, which willlx=c:tmspimndma smsouable Umeand ma~zn~us:twithSm~Lrev, dm:wl;llgjlctllaztlmdgnlityofl;Icleploject; .21 dweLt.rag umu/ac~. bconsis=m ,vim me vat Law DensitT Rzsi41ent~ Lind Use clzsirnation of the future GenenJ pt,,. l=utzbetmo~, line pmposncl R-A-2~ and R-A-S zones will ~ con.smcnt 2. with the fum~ C, Bnertl Ptan if Change of Zonz No. 22 is uiclmate|y i~contit. s,,~t wlrh the Plltt. due to me ft~ that me lz~mject u conintent with the exLm.qg Lule lot custom s~.ngle dweIJ. mg developlnalu m ~ ~ vice7 a~d I:beu' un,~.dymg 3. The project i.s compatible with sur'rt~ndmg rand u~r=~ smc= me proposed La='le tot custom single famiJy dwelhngs are amsz.~-nt witb the exutmg La..,.re lot c~.z.m~rn smg|e fa:ni~ dwethng5 and the vacant land sun~undmg Ute projecz. 4. The propostl wlu not have aA adve~e eff~.z on fhe envu'onment SmC~ mmgttton mea~urts of EnvLronmenGIJ Lmpac': ~porc No 230 and the Aj:lcL-Qdum Envtr~ru-n=nr~ Impact IL-'port No. 230 have been mcoqx,.az~ to me pmJec'~ cie~zrn and Condiuons o[ ApprovaJ for Ve~.mg Tentanve ]vilp 26942 m rec~ce the unpac~ t~ · ~eveJ Ves'tmg Tentative Tr-da Map No. 26941 1. Theft L3 a reasonable pm0ablh~ that Ven~ng Tentauve T~ M.~ No. 26c)4] wi~ be const.sten: with the CttT's ~n,rt C~n~tt] Ptan. w~ch wL].l be comp|et=l m a reasonable ~me and m ar-~or~ce with Stau: l, Js, The project. a.~ conA,uoeed. coo~orms with e;usung apphr~ht,, Ct~ zoru,ng on:~ce.s and development ~. Furmcrmo~, the Exhibit 26 completion of ~ road will Ix reQkwld prior TO CllljfiClll Of OCCUlMnCy for any of I~e lots wire me project later to Condhmn No, 17|, One of me prbary lamas relating to the propoMd.projact is gmcilng. Gredeg for me sit· will frlvotvl lately 198,000 CUbiC yams Of cu~ancl NI whic~ wig be primlr~|y IIIjlncad Me. The ProiecT will require the jmiN~ Of ePemximemiy 1,200 cu~c yarn of fill. To minimize 0recling me project Ms been ~mcljuened to inkn eat future grading end constru~on of Pads will conf~m to the cent·maul grading as ~own on me Tentafjve Map (refer to ~4exlitjone No. 9 and 1 I|. Xs ~ is an area Of Potomiel Paleontologmal resources. m Qualified Prolea '~Ao~izt igill ds required to marital the ffldjng Of the lira end lullefvvse the recovery, cau~mane and curnon Of any foes· ram·ms uncoveacl during Or·cling Irater to Condition No. 2D|. When the Crown· .Hill {vestrag Tativ· TraCT Map N0. 23143) prMCT was originalJy considered for Ipprovll, inckalecf within Ull l(~felr flood Idain wll · Proposed 8 acre Regional iologmal ~m Am·. The l/'kL!~l 1%l.'bt am we Proi;Qaecl to be uaecl by Aueument DietTact 159 for 0if-ate mitgation ter din'ict's ~lannelaUon Of Tametale Creek DrOIICt. SubseQlalnT to Thl Orlglrill IDIN'NI Of till ~rowfll I,igl PrMCT, AueumenT DiST~Ct 1 S9 wls raqtareci to ProvicllGI on-lira rathit ~ off4fte f11a~gllt~on. t~ul eiimmiTmg requirement for t~e er~inclrnenT ares. The sDl:4iclm wig be mQueracl TO remove ell reference8 to the anneric·merit ares leer to me rscorclauon Of the final map It·for to Condmo~ No. 1 Otl~er env~ronmlt%ll tlauea inciuele till Potanbli exiltlnct of Stelmen'· Kangaroo Rat ·ncf the Calaform· GnltClTClmr. The PrOIICT Ms been clmdio~l to ensure meee iu~es ·re or·Deny me~garacl proOf to Iny dizt~wblnCl Of trm Project 8~1 fretor to Concliuons No. 7 EnCf 18). Ttlt mm0mum lot raze for Irte predict will be 2 5& acres and lot eel for the Proilct will vary frllm 2 Ya tel 10 acres. The largo Ict dOmgh Of me Prefect ts cone·tent wlt~ trtl nelgrll~onng ZONING, FUTURE GENERAL PlAN AND SWAP CONSIETIN:y The llrole~'t is lonld Ree.lentill 10nculture, 5 lore rllenlmljl~ lilt Ills till*A-S) end Agriculture. 2 ~. acre m;~Mmum lot raze (R-A-Z ~ ), Th0s 0rolect is ProPosing a zone Change That will ch·nge 9 lilts from FI-A-5 TO R-A-2½ end 1 lot from FI-A-2Y~ To Ill-A-5 The total gross acre·;· o~ The SIte o.I ~33 acres. The lot s0zes for The I~olect will range from 2.5 lores to I 0.~ acres The PrODDiecl OralaCt :S =ortllsTsnT with IP4 R-A development ltlnclarcll. The tuturi Gonetel Plan Drlt~ PreferriG LInd Use MIll ellsoOn·tea ms s, Ta as very Low Denssty Remoe~lt:al IO.2 to 0.4, dwllhng urllt$ Per Icrel w~h I tarIll llensoty Of 0.3 law··ling unsls Per lore. The Proloci cllf%10Ty of .21 clwelhng unots per lore is ComDlt0lla w:th The Clenlzty ancl Target 01n$oly elf Trl future General Plan. The DrolloleO liraloot is conssilent w0th SWAP which clesognltls tlqe loll i$ per acre Exhibit 27 Exhibit 29 ITEM NO. 14 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council City Clerk~ May 25, 1993 Planning Commission Appointment APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Review the Ad-Hoc Committee recommendations and appoint one applicant to serve a full three-year term on the Temecula Planning Commission. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to Council's adopted-policy and procedure for making appointments and re-appointments, the soon to expire term of Commissioner Linda Fahey was advertised in two local newspapers of general circulation. The applications received were forwarded to the Council's Ad-Hoc committee members for the Planning Commission, and Councilmembers Parks and Stone have recommended the reappointment of Commissioner Linda Fahey. Councilmember Stone' has also indicated that Chris Martinelli would be another recommended choice for this position. Attached are copies of the applications which were received by the filing deadline of May 4, 1993. ATTACHMENTS: Copies of Applications for Appointment TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Clerk June Greek Councilmember Ron Parks May 14, 1993 Appointment of Planning Commissioner I have reviewed the applications for the Planning Commission which were forwarded to me and I recommend the City Council reappoint Commissioner Linda Fahey to another three (3) year term. I believe. Linda has served the City well since her initial appointment, as a Planning Commissioner and as the current Chairman. I'm confident that since she has indicated a willingness to continue in this capacity, the City will continue to benefit from her experience and dedication. JSG cc: City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: June Greek, City Clerk Jeff Stone, Councilman (~. May 13, 1993 Planning Commission Appointments I am privileged to recommend two candidates to be considered for the expiring commission seats. I based my recommendation on the following criteria: 1. Does the candidate live in the city of Temecula? Does the candidate possess an educational background and/or experience with planning activities? Has the candidate had experience serving on committees or commissions which may directly or indirectly benefit them in being a Planning Commissioner? 4, Is applicant motivated to become a Planning Commissioner? The candidates I am recommending are: i. Chris Martinelli A. Desirable Qualities 1. Lives in Temecula Has vast experience with neighborhood public safety and mastered the real estate principles necessary to be effective on the Planning Commission. Her business credentials enhance her viability. 3. Has been involved in three committees locally. Her motive in applying for this position includes her care for the city and feeling that she can make a positive contribution. June Greek May 13, 1993 Page 2 Having been involved in various city functions may give insight in her involvement with the Planning Commission. II. Linda Fahey A. Desirable Qualities 1. Lives in Temecula Having been Chairman on the Planning Commission, she has vast experience in this position. After contributing to drafting the General Plan, the next stage is implementation which she would like to be involved in. If you need additional comments, please don't hesitate to call on me. JES:ss Attachments CITY OF TEMECULA APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSION Qualifmation Requirement: Resident of City of Temecula COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: NAME: ;7-Z)/rH ~'. ADDRESS: H(~,,~/~ON~:7 ~ -/] ~Y OCCUPATION: EMPLOYER/ADDRESS: YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA: WORK PHONE: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE: ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: IProfessionai, technical, community, service): BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paper if necessary): I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for publicity purposes. SIGNATURE:(~/~:~(_ / ,~, ,.,- DATE: ~//z2.7/,,4..,1' PLEAS~ NOTE: Applications will be kept on file for consideration of future vacancies. Return to: City Clerk's Office, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula. CA 92390 (714) 694-1989 2/forms/COM-O01 Judith G. Hinman 32161 Corte E1 Dorado Temecula, Ca. 92592 April 13, 1993 City Clerk's Office City of Tememcula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 Dear City Clerk: This letter is in response to the opening to the City Planning Commission. I would like to be considered for this position. I can bring an enormous amount of breadth to the City of Temecula based on my past work experience and the desire to make the community where I live, a progressive one while respecting the history and uniqueness of what is already in existence. Enclosed is my resume for your review. My most recent experience has been eight years with The San Diego office of one of the major law firms in-the State of California. In 1985 when I joined Lillick and. McHose the firm it had just completed a move to larger space. At that time there were three partners, twelve attorneys and 35 people in approximately 10,000 square feet of space. Over the past eight years the San Diego office grew significantly. Currently there are 14 partners, 80 employees, 40,000 square feet of space and 15,000 square feet of subtenant space. Some of my major accomplishments over the past few years have been the merger with Pillsbury Madison & Sutro, the upgrade of three telephone systems and the sale of two telephone systems, establishing a word processing department and three computer changes, the creation of associate training and procedures for employee orientation and departures, establishing a credible records and accounting departments, a full service library, economical administration for office services, implementing cost controls: measuring the office progress and communicating this information to the Partners and the Executive Director. I have worked in the legal field for a number of years as a Legal Assistant, a Research Analyst for the Federal Trade Commission, a Law Office Administration instructor at Georgetown University and the University of San Diego, and as the Director of Administration for Pillsbury Madison & Sutro. Professional Affiliations include Georgetown University and University of San Diego Legal Assistant Advisory Boards, and the Association of Legal Administrators Board of Directors. Very truly yours, ~h G. Hinman JUDITH G. HINMAN 32161 CORTE EL DORADO TEMECULA, CA 92592 (714) 676-1324 (H) SUMMARY: BUSINESS EXPERIENCE: Twenty-five years of increasingly responsible positions'and diversified experience in creating.a strong administrative staff that is responsive to the business needs and impacting the positive results of Pillsbury Madison & Sutro. Broad experience in providing support to the attorneys by directing administrative, financial, automation systems, human resources and operations activities in a manner that is cost efficient and responsive to the needs of the firm and its clients. Exceptional strategic thinker with ability to develop plans with management perspective and execution capabilities enabling significant contributions to improvements to operating results in the firm. Successful track record of results in a broad spectrum of environments. Outstanding leadership skills. Demonstrated capability in opportunity identification and problem-solving based on pro-active involvement in all business aspects. Tactical operations plans included: Responsible for annual budget over seven million dollars. Establishment of a word processing department and managed two computer system upgrades. Coordinated design of office space, monitored construction of additional space and expansion to second floor for a total of 40,000 sq. ft. Negotiated and monitored 15,000 sq. ft of subtenant space. Established and implemented a formal effective records system. Developed inventories of equipment and library publications. 20016514 BUSINESS EXPERIENCE CONTINUED: PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: TEACHING EXPERIENCE: EDUCATION: AFFILIATIONS: Installed a new telephone system and sold two systems. Planned office services and procedures for efficient economical administration. Initiated innovative problems solving techniques for over 100 people and formulating team effort to achieve outstanding results. Implemented cost controls in supply orders and improved accounting procedures. Prepared management reports measuring expenses of profitable support centers of word processing, messenger and facilities management and reviewed financial reports. Coordinated efforts to develop marketing plan for the firm. Director of'Administration, Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, formerly Lillick & McHose, 1/85 to 4/93 Research Analyst, Federal Trade Commission, 4/79 to 8/84. Responded to congressional and corporate inquiries on various industries. Consultant, Georgetown University, Legal Assistant Program 4/78 to 8/84. Student orientation, job resources and legal assistant evaluations. University of San Diego, Lawyer's Assistant Program, Law Office Administration, 1985 to 1986. Faculty, Georgetown University, Legal Assistant Program, Law Office Administration, 1976 to 1984. Faculty, Howard County Community College, Paralegal/Legal Assistant Career, 1978 to 1980. Graduate of Georgetown University, Legal Assistant Program, Advanced training in financial, personnel and management courses. University of San Diego, Lawyer's Assistant Program, Advisory Board. Formerly on the Georgetown University Legal Assistant, Advisory Board. Association of Legal Administrators, Board of Directors. 2001651& Qualif~.ation Requirement: Resident of City of Temecula ~//' ~" COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: Planning NAME: ADDRESS: Chris Martinelli 30255 Corte Cantania HOME PHONE: 694-0853 OCCUPATION: co-owner & EMPLOYER/ADDRESS: Analytic Artistry EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: Bachelor of Science Degree in Business Graduate of the Realtors Institute Calefornia Real Estate License YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA: 2 WORK PHONE: 695-1007 part-time marketing co-ordinator 30255 1/2 for a software Corte Cantania Temecula 92591 Administration- CSULB CO LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE: Get A Grip Committee- 1992-93 Community Services' Neighborhood Council- 1992-present Siqn Ordinance Committee- 1992-present ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, service): Temecula Chairman of Neighborhood Watch Member-School District's Community Partnership (substance abuse BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paper if necessary): Please see the attached letter. prevent- I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for publicity purposes. PLEASE NOTE: Applications w;I be kept on file for consideration of future vacancies. Retum to: City Clerk's Office, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92390 (714) 694-1989 2/forms/COM-OO1 June Greek City Clerk, City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula Ca 92591 4/30/93 Dear Ms. Greek, Enclosed is my application for a position on the Planning Commis- sion. I believe that I am qualified for this position because of my educational, business, and personal credentials. In 1982 I gradu- ated (with honors) from California State University at Long Beach with a bachelor's degree in business administration. I have taken numerous courses in law, contracts, management, group dynamics, real estate, economicS, and the like. My past experience as a real estate agent gives insight into land use issues. As a co- owner of a small corporation in this city, I am aware of many of the economic issues that businesses face. Before moving to Temecula in late 1990, my family studied all of Southern California, looking for that ideal mix of demographics, "community spirit", economic potential, and climate. We are happy we chose the city of Temecula and plan to live here for many many years. I want to serve on the Planning Commission be- cause I care about the city and I want to make a contribution to its future. I have become very active in the community and have attended many different commission and city council meetings and thus have some understanding of how the city "works." Since I have no children living at home, and am self-employed, I am able and willing to devote the twelve to fifteen hours per meeting to read, research, and visit the sites as required to perform my duties. I will listen to all input and try to make informed decisions. Best regards, Chris Martinelli Qualification Requirement: Resident of City of Temecula ~"' PlanninR Commission COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: Walter B. Dixon 20 Years NAME: YEARS RESIDENT ADDRESS:P.O. Box 531, Temecula, CA. 92593 OFTEMECULA: 909-676-5394 909-699-6349 HOME PHONE: WORK PHONE: Development Consultant/Planning and Engineering Consultant OCCUPATION: 41785 Enterprise Circle South, Suite D, Temecula, CA. 92590 EMPLOYER/ADDRESS: AiA Architecture. John Muir ColleRe, Pasadena, CA. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: Rancho California Horsemen Association, President Southern Califor'nia Lions Eye Institute, Trustee and L.M. /MS Wilderness Camp for Deaf Children of California and Nevada, 3rd. Vice President, 34,000+ members Temecula Town Association, Long time member T ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE: N.I.C.E.T. Engineering Technologies, Life Member Inland Counties Water Association Orange County Water Association, Life Member ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG:(Professional, technical, community, se~ice): Monrovia Elks Lodge, Life Member T~mecu]~ l.ions Club. 19 Year member BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUAMFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use add~ional paper if necessa~): Kindly read the remarks below and the attached resume to see that our varied'experience speaks for itself, and as continued on page 2 I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for publicity purposes. 2~o~,/co~oo~ 92590 Please be advised that the applicant does not in fact reside inside the City Limits and or its sphere of influence. However we have a very close kinship with the City and many of the residents having worked here since Januar~ of 1966, 27 years. City of Temecula, Planning Commission Application,' page 2 The applicant worked with the Engineering Firm, James M. Montgom- ery, Consulting Engineers of Pasadena CA. and as such we created the Rancho California Water District and the subsequent Planning and Development that nurtured what is now the City of Temecula and local environs. After serving the Water District as an Engineering Consultant for more than 10 years we have operated three separate business ven- tures within the confines of what is now The City of Temecula. We believe that having our own Engineering Firm since 1977 and several other associated business ventures along with the more than forty years experience in the field of Planning and Engin- eering should certainly qualify us in this regard. Our resume should speak for itself. In conclusion, we do own considerable property within the City of Temecula as the City is a very intregal part of our lives, along with the fact that we have conducted business within the area of the City since 1973 Thank you for your consideration, · m:'~ rcRSl=:=r-, SEF--V-iCES ,~,..,~ .v .,~_,~. ~. ~..~.,.,~,. Pet"-q,'~prn,',nt C.~ns,'littmL~ UPDATED RESUME OF WALTER B. DIXON (As'of April 1993) DIVERSIFIED SERVICES Currently and for the past several years Mr. Dixon has been in- volved in the planning of several Commercial Developments in var- ious areas of Southern California. As a Development Consultant he has shared his lifetime of engineering and planning experience to'enhance many developments. He continues to consult with pri- vate owners and development teams in challenging the negative elements of the electorate that believe that any form of planned development is not in the best interests of the general public. CONSULTANT TO LOCAL ENGINEERING FIRMS After several years of working in the family feed business Mr. Dixon had the desire and need to return to full time participa- tion to his major interests of Engineering, Surveying and Land Planning. As a result of this decision he has contracted Engin- eering work and services from many Engineering and Surveying firms in the area and became a consultant that these firms could depend upon. Mr. Dixon eventually directed his efforts to a singular develop- ment effort. He was asked to initiate and assemble Planning and Engineering teams to 'create the engineering effort to bring to- gether Assessment District's 159 and 161, a project that was to be lead by The County of Riverside as the Lead Agency of these two separate districts, each comprising approximately 6000 acres in scope. He spent the next year and one half as the Engineering ~lanager of these two Assessment Districts overseeing the the pre- liminary design efforts involving all of the engineering elements encompassed in the scope of the work. Outdated resume continues on the next page ........ RESUME OF WALTER B. DIXON (As of January SUMf~RY: ~ .~ r~:. Dixon has 33 years of experience in civil engineering design of wate:~ and wastewater' systems, municipalbuildings, commercial centers,residential developments, streets and bridges. His background encompasses supervision of civil design and drafting, field inspection, surveying and construction activities; aerial and Photogrammetric surveys; architectural design develop- ment; cartography; area planning; construction and remodeling of office building~s and private residences. His experience covers every aspect of general and civil engineering from draftsman to President of a very sucess- ful Engineering Corporation. EXPERIENCE: TItE FEED LOT flD~ - l~e~.) The Feed Lot, Rancho California Mr. Dixon is currently a business partner With his wife and son in an animal feed store'. serving-Rancho California, Temecula, Murrieta, Aguanga and Anza. The store services the needs of horse r~nchoc, cattle, chicken and hog growers in the area. The business is a year and half old having started with just the three principals. At the present time there is a total of ten people. working together as the needs of the community grow. D~VERSIFIED ENGINEERING Mr. Dixon created Diversified Engineering in Rancho California after being .asked to return to the Pasadena Main Office of Montgomery Engineers to an~ executive position. The clear air and quiet of country life took precedeL over the hustle of .City life and the demands of large corporate business leading in the decision to stay in the area. The engineering firm was developed and g~ew to serve the needs of a growing rura~ community. The firm specialized in parcel map and tract development, grading plans, architectural design of homes, office buildings along with commercial and industrial buildings. After six years of leadership as }'residen~ and C.E.0. of the firm, D~. Dixon retired from this engineering endeavor to begin4~new challenge of the family partnership of-thci~ ~j feed store. ~ JAMES M, MONTGOMERY CONSULTING ENG!I'II.,'ERS INC, Supervising Engineering: Mr. Dixon was the office manager of the Rancho California Branch office of James M. Montgomery. The work involved plan- ning design, and construction, supervision and inspection of all water and wastewater facilities for an area encompassing more than 100,000 acres. The area had been planned for urban, industrial, recreational, and agri- cultural development. He has served progressively as civil engineering designer, senior civil engineering designer, associate engineer, office engineer, and supervising engineer with active participation in all facets of water and wastewater systems design. Mr. Dixon has been involved in the design development of pipelines, pumping stations, reservoir, waste- water collection systems, architectural design (as related to water and wastewater facilities), and construction inspection, supervision and administration of .these projects. He was employed for 18 years with this Engineering Company. -~ Civil Engineering Designer: ~. Dixon participated in land planning; subdivision, street, sewer, and storm drain design; field inspection, and construction supervision. Worked closely with City planners and engineering personnel in developing large residential and commercial areas .during the construction and housing boom after World War II. He provided architectural treatment in design of several municipal buildings; superintendent of con- struction on many development. projects including shopping centers and school~ for 5 years. CIVIL ENGINEERING FIRM IN PASADENA Architectural-Engineering Designer: Responsibilities involved street and sewer design for residential subdivisions, site grading and civil design on school projects and large commercial developments. Also responsible for coordinating architectural aspects of numerous design projects. C~TOGRAPtFY FIRM IN LOS ANGELES Cartographer: Duties included research, development, drafting, and publi- cation of local, city, county, state, and special maps for the movie industry and the business community in general. r.~. Dixon also opened a map-mounting division and assisted in ·developing new methods and appli- cations for the use of wallmaps in business and industry. SELF-EFFPLOYED ~. Dixon was self-employed in the residential-design and construction field, having designed many custom residences, commercial buildings, small apartments, and motels for individuals and contractors. Also engaged in building and remodeling of single-family residences, commercial and business offices, and constructed several residences he had designed. · EDUCATION: A.A., Architecture, John Muir College, Pasadena, California Pasadena City College, Pasadena, California Mt. San Antonio College, Walnut, California RESISTRATION: University of California at Los Angeles, Extended Day Certified Senior E~ngineering Technician National Society of Professional Engineers Life Member A.W.W.A. Certified Water Treatment Works Operator, Grades III and IV. 0RGAI: I ZAT IONS: Inland Counties Water Association Orange County Water Association Monrovia Elks Lodge (~years) ~ / Rancho California Lions Club (-~-years) served through Deputy District Governor Butterfield Savings and Loan served as a Charter Director Rancho Temecula Parks Association served as a Charter Director for 5 years Pasadena Speedboat Club, Past Z'resident Rancho California Horsemen's Association, Past President APPLICATION FOR. APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSI ~'P~: :~: ~-:4~23+ ---.. Qualification Requirement: Resident of City of Temecule B~')'2''~/~~ COMMISSION ON-WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: p(~ .I ~, A L'~o Y~..v'~, 5_~, NAME:/~/~/~ Z. ~'~r.~RS // 759 - 3/33 RESIDENT OF TEMECULA: ADDRESS: =?~S ~ X,t Coro~,~ ~.~ HOME PHONE: WORK PHONE:F~ OCCUPATION: . EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: ' z., C ~. LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE: pt~,.~,,,,,..~ d'o~,.~,,,,a, Q,-ly o[ '7~,~_(~ /~'?..e.~,,-7I °"24~"'~°~ ?'~ ~"'2-~ ?% ,"~."."j '?"..":Lo~,'~ ~""',.'. =,,...~,...-,,-,-' BRIEFLY STATE WH;~ YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS~:~OMMrlSSION, AND WHY YOU ?"5"': "°2"'3 I understand that eny .or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for public' purposee, . .. Retum to: City Clerk's Office, 43174 Business Perk Drive, Temecula, CA 92390 {714) 694-1989 2Horm$/C OM-OO 1 P CURRTCU~UMVITA~ LINDR L. FAHEY, R,N., M.S.N. 29855 La Coroa~a Court 714-699-5004 -Temeoula, ca. 92390 6~9-739-3%34 (0) MDUCATTONt Major: Nursing V~TPERIMNCv-: Bachelor o= Science University of Central Arkansas, MaJort Nursing 1975 11-89 tO present: Assistant Administrator, Nursing 'Services Palemar Medical Cents: Escondi~o, Ca. 9202S Coordinates and supervises the clinical and administrative function of nursing including all inpatientunits, surgical services, mental health, emergency and trauma services. Reports directly to the Administrator and par~icipates in decision making process for major issues affecting health system. Fistally responsible for an e ense budget of 31.2 million and for 575 FTE's. Ac~ing Administrator in the absence of the Admlnistra~or. 10-87 - 11-89: Nurse Manager/Department Director Tower 8, Medical Palomar Medical Center Escondido, Ca. 92025 Supervised and coordinated the delivery of nursin~ care on 33 bed medical unit. Participates as nursing representative in implementation of Cost Accounting System. A member of Nursing Steering Committee for Computer Development. Involved with selection and current implementation of Baxter computer system. Coordinated development of new documentation system for medical-surgical units to improve patient care and meet JCAHO standards in that area. -1- 2985.q La.Corona Court 73.4-699-5004 Temeoule, Ca. 92390 .63.9-739-3:34 (0~ 2-86 - 8-87: Assistant Director of Nursing Craven Medical Cen~er New Bern, N.C. Coordinated and supervised the clinical and administrative func~cions of six medical-surgical unit= and one mental health unit in a 300 bad acu=e care hospital. Responsible for fiscal planning and coordination of the delivery of care within ~he beds com lex consisting of 150 and 175 s~aff members. corporation, AdJunc~ Clinical Zns~ructor at East Carolina University School of Nursing, Graduate Program. 8-85 - 1-86: Staff Development Znstructor Craven Medical Center New Bern, N.C. Identified education needs in clinical areas by observing and participatin in clinical nursing. Implemented prc~ram'~mee~ identified education needs. Served as resource person to nurse managers and staff nurses on nutsin practice issues. BCLS Instructor, ACLS certi~ied. 5-81 - 8-82: Summer, 83: Course Coordinator Instructor Loma Linda university School of Nursing Coordinated critical care nursing course involving ?0 students and six instructors. Worked with various hospitals to arrange clinical teaching time. Provided guidance to instructors who taught course. Heled plan and teach general medical-sur ice1 course invo~ving 50 students each quarter. Supervised nursing students in critical care and general medical-surgical clinical rotations. Worked closely with clinical nursing staff and served as resource person in the clinical setting. Par~icipated on Nursing Quality Assurance Committee at Loma Linda University Medical Center. -2- LINDA L. FAIiEY, R, N., H.s. N. 2905S LaCorona Court Temeoula# Ca. 92390 7-75 - 10-79: 7~4-699-5004 (H 619-739'3134 (O charge Nurse U.S. Navy Duties included supervising and evaluating nursing personnel, identifying clinical practice ~roblems and. seeking appropriate solutions, and supervzsin new graduate nurses in the clinical setting. Clinical experience includedcritical care, Medical-Surgical, Obstetrics, Newborn Care Operating Room, Recovery Room and Outpatient Nursing Care. ' Licensure= Research=. Memberships: Community'Service: california G304273 "Effects of Sensory and Coping Information on Postoperative Pain" Sigma Theta Tau Organization of Nurse Executives American College of Healthcare Executives(nominee) Member of Planning Commission, City of Temecula 1991 to present, Chairman in 92/93. Member of Lifeflight Board of Directors 2/23/93kt -3- ITEM NO. 15 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: · FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council June S. Greek May 25, 1993 Lease of Microfilm Equipment PREPARED BY: Grant 'Yates - Financial Services Administrator RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve a lease with Burtronics for a City- Wide Microfilm Reproduction System to implement the City's Records Management Program. DISCUSSION: The City has been incorporated for over three years now and the need for specialized equipment to help manage the City's growing record system is imperative. Staff sent out a Request for Proposal (RFP) to 13 companies who specialize in providing records management systems to large corporations and governmental agencies. Based upon the responses to the RFP, a selection committee interviewed 4 companies who appeared to be the best qualified to meet the City's needs. The selection committee consisted of City Clerk June Greek, Network Administrator Tom Hafli, Principal Engineer Ray Casey and Financial Services Administrator Grant Yates. In addition, Debbie Ubnoske, Senior Planner and Charlie Voos, Senior Building Inspector, were included in the selection'process. Each firm was asked to make a presentation on their products and how their products could meet the City's needs in two areas, namely, source documents and engineering documents. During the interviews, the committee was interested in not only equipment for source documents, which is the standard 8 1/2" X 11" letter size documents, but also engineering drawings and documents. Each of the four firms interviewed were able to provide the City with both types of equipment. Based upon the results of the interviews, Burtronics, headquartered in San Bernardino, was selected to be the City's vendor. Burtronics has an excellent reputation in the industry for their products, and their services. Burtronics is the largest supplier of governmental microfilm equipment in this area, specializing in 3M and Minolta Products and having provided systems for entities such as the Counties of Riverside and San Bernardino, several Federal Governmental Agencies, and many local Cities. Agenda Report . Lease of Microfilm Equipment May 25, I 993 Page 2. After analyzing the information provided in the interviews, the selection committee decided that the cost of the engineering equipment outweighed the benefit of acquiring it. In addition to the equipment cost, there was the consideration that one additional staff member in the Engineering Department might be needed to operate the equipment. Therefore, staff is proposing that the City only acquire one reader/printer for engineering documents and select a service company to microfilm all of the City's engineering documents that are currently on file. In addition, staff will be working on a policy that will require all plans submitted to the City, be provided not only in hard copy, but also on a microfilm readable card. Staff estimates the cost of sending out all existing engineering plans on file at $46,000. This cost could be spread over a number of years and if the policy of requiring all plans on film is implemented, there would be no future costs for the City to convert hard copy plans to film. The next component of this system, which will allow the City to be better able to manage records, is the source document equipment. This equipment will assist the City Clerk's Office as we are concerned that the City will be running into a real records storage problem in the future. By leasing this equipment while the City is relatively young, staff will be able to set up an effective system for managing records. In addition, the City Clerk's Office does have the staff to dedicate to operating this equipment under the City-Wide Records Management system. In fact, this equipment will allow staff to become more efficient in performing records storage and retrieval duties. As part of the interview process, the selection committee also looked into hiring a firm to provide microfilming services to the City. Staff estimated that the cost to microfilm all existing City records by an outside provider would be approximately $102,000. This estimate does not include any ongoing filming needs. It is only the cost of filming all records that are currently on file. Based upon these costs, staff is recommending that we enter into a lease with Burtronics for the following equipment: Item Purchase Price * One Minolta Automatic feed camera $17,295.00 · One Minolta Reader Printer 8,749.75 · One Jacket loader 2,800.00 · One Engineering Reader/Printer 27,256.50 · One additional Reader 789.50 · Xerox 2510 Engineering copier 5,937.00 TOTAL $62,827.75 The Xerox copier is an additional item that the Engineering Department has requested to photocopy engineering plans. Currently, Engineering sends out plans to be photocopied which takes time and costs money. The proposed Xerox machine is slightly used and is offered at a substantial discount. Staff was interested in purchasing this copier outright, however, Agenda Repo~ Leaae of MicrofilmEquipment May 25, 1993 Page 3. Burtronics was willing to include this piece of equipment in the lease of the microfilm equipment, which made this an attractive alternative. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of this equipment totals ~62,827.75 if it is purchased outright. The terms of the lease include a five year term with a one dollar buyout at the end of the five years. The interest rate is estimated at 8%, with an estimated annual payment of $16,455 including sales tax and installation costs. The interest rate could fluctuate slightly before the final numbers are calculated. These numbers will be made final when Burtronics receives a Purchase Order from the City. There are funds available in the Copy Center Internal Service Funds to pay for the annual lease costs for this equipment. JSG:cb DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS TO: FROM: ·DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT APPROVAL: CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER City Council/City Manager Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official/~' May 25, 1993 Building and Safety April, 1993, Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. DISCUSSION: The following is a summary of activity for April, 1993. Building Permits Issued ...................................... 240 Building Valuation ................................... $13,836,537 Revenue Collected ................................... ~ 116,368 Housing Starts ............................................ 117 New Commercial Starts ........................... 4 = 48,689 Sq. Ft. Commercial Additions/Alterations .................... 9 = 13,627 Sq. Ft. Attached you will find a summary of building inspections performed during the past twenty-four (24) month period. Of special note is that inspection workload was the heaviest to date at 1,446 inspections performed during the month of April, 1993. //"' V:~WP~AGENDA.REP~APRIL'93.RPT Agenda Repo~ May 25, 1993 Page 2 The following is an update of projects of special note that staff is currently involved with and/or recently completed. New Construction Rancho CaliforniaWater District Headquarters Chili's Restaurant Pep Boys M.I.E. Coco's Percent Completed 85% 100% 100% 100% 60% V:\WP~AGENDA,REP~APRIL'93.RPT ~ 000000000000 O000000000000e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 · 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 oooo 0 0 0 0 ~.PPROV/~L CITY ~TTORNEY FINM~CE OFFICER CITY II~N~GER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO; BOARD OF DIRECTORS FROM: DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER DATE: MAY 25, 1993 SUBJECT: DEPARTMENTAL REPORT PREPARED BY: ~ SHAWN D. NELSON, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR The City is now in the process of receiving approvals from the Army Corps of Engineers and .Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regarding the 28 acre park site located on Pala Road. It is expected that this project will be out for public bid in June/July, 1993. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan was reviewed and approved by the Community Services and Planning Commissions. The Master Plan will be forwarded for approval by the City Council after the General Plan has been adopted. Construction to install new ballfield fencing on the North and South fields in the Rancho California Sports Park is completed. This project was required to improve the safety of the youth and adults that participate on these fields. Improvements to Loma Linda Park Site have been completed and the park is now temporarily fenced to allow the new grass to germinate. The fencing will be removed by the first part of June, and the park will be dedicated in July, 1993. The Park "B" in the Presley Development (9 acres) is progressing with the slope and turf areas now hydroseeded. The playground area has been installed. This park is scheduled to be accepted for maintenance in August, 1993, and is being constructed by the developer to meet the Quimby requirements for their subdivision project. The rough grading has been completed on the park site in the Paloma Del Sol Development (9 acres). This park will consist of two lighted ballfields with soccer overlays, restroom/snack bar facility, and parking improvements and is expected to be dedicated to the City in September, 1993. The Senior Center is currently under construction and is expected to be completed in July, 1993. Staff has received the approved lease from the California Department of Forestry (CDF) for the property adjacent to the Senior Center. This property will be utilized as a parking lot for the Senior Center. Also, staff was informed by the County of Riverside Office on Aging that the City's Senior Center has been selected as an approved site for a daily Nutrition For Seniors Program. The program is totally funded by the Office on Aging other than the City has to provide a facility for the program. All costs of staffing, food preparation, and administration will be borne by the Office on Aging. Phase II of the Community Recreation Center (CRC) Project is moving forward with the concrete slabs for the gymnasium and multi-purpose room already completed. Staff is now working with the CRC Foundation to determine equipment and furniture needs for the CRC. It is anticipated that completion will be in November or December, 1993. The recreation brochure for Summer/Fall 1993 will be distributed the first part of June, 1993. The recreation program continues to expand in the areas of recreation classes, special events, teen programs, senior programs, and excursions. The development of a skateboarding area in the Rancho California Sports Park has been included in the five (5) year Capital Improvement Program under the Sports Park Parking Lot Project. If this project is approved, staff will pursue selecting a landscape' architect and forming a project committee comprised of skateboarders and Teen Council members to develop a design for the skateboarding area. APPROVAL CITY 'ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER/~fr,- CITY MANAGER ~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning~q// May 25, 1993 Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File Discussion: The following is a summary of the Planning Department's caseload and project activity for the month of March/April 1993: Caseload Activity: The department received applications for 17 administrative cases and 8 public hearing cases for the month of March and 21 administrative cases and 15 public hearing cases for the month of April. The following is a breakdown of case type for public hearing items: March Minor Public Use Permit Public Use Permit Change of Zone Extension of Time Parcel Map Public Use Permit Reversion of Acreage April * Conditional Use Permit * Change of Zone * Extension of Time * Lot Line Adjustment * Parcel Map * Plot Plan * Setback Adjustment 4 1 1 3 1 3 2 R:\S\MONTHLY.RPT\1993\MAR-APR 5117~93 vg,w 1 Onooino Projects: , General Plan: To date the Council has reached a consensus on all the elements but housing. That element as well as the Environmental Impact Report and Mitigation Monitoring Program will be discussed at the June 15th City Council meeting. Old Town Master Plan: The Old Town steering committee met on April 8, 1993 and recommended approval of the Draft Specific Plan. A Planning commission public hearing on the Draft Plan will be held on June 7, 1993. French Valley Airoort: The County has received a grant from the Federal Aviation Administration, to prepare the Airport Facility Master Plan for French Valley Airport. The comprehensive Land Use Plan and Master Plan will be developed concurrently. An initial meeting Of the steering committee was held in March. Wal-mart: The Wal-mart Plot Plan, Change of Zone and Tentative Map have been scheduled for the June 1993 Planning Commission meeting. Temecula ReQional Center Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report: This Specific Plan was presented at a Planning Commission Workshop on May 4, 1992. The Commissioners gave direction to the applicant and staff. This Specific Plan went to a DRC meeting January 5, 1993. Staff is awaiting submittal of additional information. Winchester Hills and CamDos Verdes Specific Plans and Environmental Impact Reports: These Specific Plans were discussed at a Planning Commission Workshop on May 4o 1992. The Commissioners gave direction to the applicant and staff. The Notice of Completion for the Campos Verdes EIR went to State Clearinghouse July 1 O, 1992. Both of these Specific Plans went to the DRC meetings on January 5, 1993. Staff is awaiting submittal of additional information. RoriDauQh Hills SPeCific Plan: This Specific Plan has not yet been filed with the Planning Department. The plan proposes to develop 800 acres at an overall density of 3 units per acre and will contain approximately 30 acres of open space, neighborhood commercial and two elementary schools. A pre- application workshop on this Specific Plan was held at the July 6, 1992 Planning Commission meeting. Murdv Ranch Specific Plan and Environmental Impact RePOrt: This Specific Plan was presented to the Planning Commission at a Workshop on April 6, 1992. The Commission provided Staff and the applicant direction relative to design issues. The applicant has incorporated these changes into the Specific Plan. This Specific Plan will be scheduled for a Planning Commission meeting upon completion of the Development Agreement and the Congestion Management Plan. R:\S~MONTHLY.RPT~I 993~MAR-APR 5/17/93 vgv~ 2 Johnson Ranch Specific Plan: The Johnson Ranch Specific Plan is a mix of residential land uses and a mixed-use "resort village" core area on 1,765 acres located adjacent to Anza Road and Borel Road, north of Rancho California Road. This Specific Plan was submitted in early March. The Notice of Preparation was submitted to State Clearinghouse on April 17, 1992. A DRC meeting was held for this Specific Plan on May 14, 1992. A subsequent DRC date has not yet been set. R:\S~MONTHLY.RPT~1993\MAR-APR 5117/93 vgw 3 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager /~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 25, 1993 Public Works Monthly Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Report for April, 1993. pwO1 ~agdrpt~,93~0525~moectrpt.04 o o ~s n LU W 0 O 0 o . 0 0 ~ e 0 ~ w m w OOw 0 ¢ ~ Z Z Z ~ Z 0 ~ z u ~ m o ~ z E zE z z z ~ ~ ~ TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM 1 CITY MANAGER /~ TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/Board of Directors FROM: Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer DATE: May 25, 1993 SUBJECT: Combining Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1993 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1993 RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors receive and file the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Nine Months ended March 31, 1993. DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited activity of the TCSD for the nine months ended March 31, 1993. Please see the attached financial statements for analytical review of financial activity. ATTACHMENTS: Combining Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1993 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1993 V:~WP\TCSDREVE.AGN 0 1,1,1 0 t'O G (:D 0 ~LL t:::: 0 E_mc~ ;> << E E E~ ~ 0 r,z., ITEM NO. 2 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager\Board of Directors FROM: David Dixon, City Manager DATE: May 25, 1993 SUBJECT: Acceptance of the Mass Grading for the Community Recreation Center - Phase I, Project No. PW92-029 PREPARED BY: on Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the Board appropriate an additional $485.71 from TCSD Bond proceeds and accept the Mass Grading for the Community Recreation Center - Phase I, Project No. PW92-029, as complete and direct the City Clerk to: File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one- year Maintenance Bond (10% of contract amount), e Authorize the release of the construction retention thirty-five (35) days after filing of the Notice of Completion, and Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed to that date. BACKGROUND: On September 22, 1992, the Board awarded a construction contract to R. W. Cash Construction Engineering for the Mass Grading at the Community Recreation Center - Phase I (Project No. PW92-029), in the amount of $428,573. On December 8, 1992, the Board approved Contract Change Order No. 001 in the amount of $38,700 for overexcavation, for a total contract amount of $467,273. Additional costs were also incurred due to the extra work associated with the supersaturated soil after the rains, construction delays, clearing of the channel, and special grading requirements by Southern California Gas Company for this project. However, this project also had cost savings due to the relocation of the borrow site and a reduction in the final bid quantities. Therefore, the total additional cost is required to complete Phase I of the CRC Project is $6,358.21. pwO4%agdrpt~,93~OS25%pw92-029 0518 However, the Professional Surveying Services for this project accrued a cost savings of $5,872.50 by relocating the borrow pit and limiting the number of construction survey staking phases. Therefore, since the City received a $5,872.50 credit, the total additional amount required to complete this project can be reduced to $485.71 by utilizing these cost savings. The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. FISCAL IMPACT: . The total Fiscal Impact is $473,631.21 for this project. The Board had previously approved an appropriation of $467,273 for the construction of this project. With the above mention cost savings of $5,872.50 for surveying services, an additional $485.71 needs to be appropriated to account no. 210-190-129-5804 for this project from TCSD Bond proceeds. ATTACHMENTS 1) 2) 3) Notice Of Completion Performance Bond Maintenance Bond pwO4\agdrpt~93\O525~pw92-029 0518 RECORDING REQUESTED BY · AND RETURN TO: - CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 Bueinee8 Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The City of Temecula is.the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. 3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to R. W. CASH CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING to perform the following work of improvement: MASS GRADING FOR THE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER - PHASE I. 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on MAY 25, 1993. That upon said contract the was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT PW 92- 029. 6. The street address of said property is: TEMECULA SPORTS PARK. Dated at Temecula, California, this _ day of ,1993. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of RiverRide by said City Council, Dated at Temecula, California, this day of , '1993. JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk Forms/C~-O01 Rcv. 12-5-9l pwO1%cip%projects%pw92-O29%completn.not 051893 CITY OF TEMECULA, COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MAINTENANCe BOND FINAL CONT!~::-~:T PRICE OJECTNO. 92-029 Bond Number: 003002011-A Premium Included in Performance Bor · KNOW ALL MEN IY THEtE PRESENTS THAT,' RW Cash Construction Engineering 555 W. State Street Ontario, California ,91762 NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR a Partnership , hlreinafter called Principal, end ffill in whither e Cor~lorltii~n, Pattnershll) o~ individulll Amwest Surety Znsurance company 6~20 Cano~:a Avenue.Suite 500 ~9od~apd Hills. California ~ME A~D ADDRESS OF hereinafter called SUREr, are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECU~,. hereinaftercalildOWNER in th~ pen~l sum of ~o~y-~o ~housand ~igh~ Hund~ed ~r~y-Seven DoZ~a~s and 30/100***~***************~,,,,,,,~DO~S ~S (1,2.857.3o** ) in lawful mo~y of tM United Staffs, for the payment of which lure well and truly to ~e madl, we bind ourlalvel, successors end a~slgns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereel. the Principal entered into e certain Contract with the OWNER, dated the 22nd dally ~lf September ,11 92 o I COpy Of WhiCh ts hereto attached and made I part hereof for the construction of PROJECT NO. 92,029, WHEREAS, said CDntrI~Ct provides that the lrtnoipll will furnish e bond conditloned to guarantee for the ~}edod of a year after approval of the final earls.ate on said Jo.b, by the OWNER, against eli defects in workmanship and materials which may become applrent during said period; end WF;EREAS, tl~e said Contract has been completed, end was approved on f)'~¢z,,cL/~/~ NOW. THERE;ORE: TH~ COND.rT.!rJN OF TH!S OBL!GAT!,nN !S e,'JCH, ~het ~f within ~,na year the date of approval of the laid Contract, the work done under the terms of said Contract shall disclose Door worl<manship in the exeoution of said work, end the Clrtying Out of the fermi of saicl ContraCt. or ft shall appear that defective matedall were furnished thereunder, then This obligation shalr remain in full force and virtue, otherwise thai instrument Ih811 be void. State of California NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT Counby of San Bernardino On 3/2'5/93 before me, S.L. Kyseth ""Public, personally appeared Anita K. HcCarty (here insert name) Notary , Personally known to me (or proved .o me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the Person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me all that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/ their signature(s) on the instrument the Person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the Person(s) acted, executed the instrurnent. ..... WITNESS my hand and official seal. , OFFK:3N. SEN, ' ' ,.L. Signatu ~OTaR~ PUBLIC - CAL~F01tNIA SAN ~RNARDIN0 COUNT/ · I~ Cmm~s$1~ hi'fiBs F~ 24. 1995 [] INDIVIDUAL(S) [] CORPORATE OF~=ICER(S) CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER [] PARTNER(S) · X~] ATTORNEy IN FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) [] SUBSCRIBING WITNESS r"l GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER SIGNERREPRESENTiNG NAME ~ ~R~S) OR ENTITY(~ Am~es~ Surety ~nsu:ance Company ATTENTION NOTARY: Although the information nmuested below is OPTIONAL e could gx~ent h"audulent ~t of this certificate, THIS CERTIFICATE MUST Document Title or Type: Maintenance Bond BE ATTACHED TO THE · DOCUMENT DESCRIBED HEREIN: i~_ UN-AgO16 (7/91) ~ Number of Pages: 3 Signer(s) other than named above; Document Date: 3/25/93 None Signed and sealed thls 25c',,, day of March ¶9 93 .(See() Amwest Surety Insurance Company SURETY line) ' Atl:orney-Zn-Fact (TitIt) APPROVED Ag TO FORM; Scott F. F, eld, City AttOrney RW Cash Construction Engineering (Title) By: (Name) ' (TIdal ~ BOND NUMBER POVd~R NUMBER ~ ~: 003002011 -A ~,:-~ :. 12 - 3 0 - ~'~1-3:, F" ::. '7 ":7'=' :' '~--' - ............... .t~ sum .~ ~:-- ............ ::::::: ............... ~:~':' -onua~E :. :'.'::::. ~6g...':- ~ ' - ................ ~ :::~'~ This document is pnnted on multi-colored secu~ty paper ~th black and red ink, ~th border in blue ink and bears the rinsed ~ ~:~': Th~s Power of Attorney ~s valid solely in connection ~th the execution and dellyen' of the bond noted above and may not be ~:~ 2 m conJuncuon ~qth any other power of attorney. No representatio~ or wa~anties regarding th~ Power of Atto~ev may ..... be made bv any Person. This Power of Attorney is governed by the laws of the State of Olffomm. Am' power of at(ome{. ~"3~'~ ~': KNO~' ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that Amwest Surety Insurance Company. a California ::i~'.: coloration (the "Company"). does hereby make, constitute and appoint: : ;- :~ s t r.~c and iawful Attorney-m-Fact, ~th limited power and authonty for and on behalf of the Company as surety. ~ :.'. ~'>.~'.'.:tc dci~vcr and affix the seal of the Company thereto if a seal ~s rcqmred on bonds, undertakings, rc~,.:::::.m~c~ cr o=hcr written obligations in the nature thereof as follows: .... ~ i~"r,SC' . ,. CERTIFICATE i the undersigned sccreta~' of Arewest Surety Insurance Company. a California coCorattan. ~-~Ei:Eg':' CERTIP: that th~s Poxvet of Anomcv reinruns m full force and effect and has not been revoked · :::-. :~:r',nc~orc. that the rcsoiuuons of the Board of Directors set forth on the reverse, and that the relevant : .-. m~ c~: :he Bx-Laws ' .- .-- · 2'.,~, 5::nc~ and scaicd a: San Berna~dino Ca .... -.. -' . ' : ,. ":: _.:,.: - This Power of At:one:- ',s signed and sealed by fats:mile under and by the authority of :he fc:b:v:n~ rcsoiu::::L~ 4 ..... ' ~,.- ,;,. B~arb_i of D~rec:ors of Arewest Sure:-.' !r. sur~n:z C~Z-'..zz.nv z: a meet:rig ~u]'.' hold on December !5. !c7~. ": ..... ' ..... RESOLVED. that the Pros:den: or any V,.cc Pros:den:. t.-. co~iunction v~:h thz Score:arT,'· or an],- Asslstan: Score:at- may appo:n: attorneys-an-face or agents wi:.h autho.-.rT.- as dcan:d cr i.'-mizcd m ti:c ms:ran:cnz cvidcnc;ng ti].: appo:n::v:::.j m each case,/or and on behalf of the Company. to execute and dehvcr and affix the sea] of the Company ~o bonds. undenak:ngs. recognmanceS. and suretyshlp obligation_~ of all kinds: and said off:cars mav ran:ova any such attomev-n-..- fact or agent and revoke an3- power of attorney previously granted to such person. RESOL\ID K'RTHER. that an3- bond, undertaking. recognmance. or suretyship oblieation ~;-~7 be v UPOn t!-',e Company: . · - - ................. (i) v.'i*.zn s:?.cd by the Proslalom cr am- Vice President and attested and sca]cd (,if a sczZ be recurred'. in- :.::- (ii) v.'hcn s:~cn4a by the Press, den: or am' \':ca President or Scareta:T or .Assistant SeefaraD.-. and coun:crs;:.:nc,j an:2 sca~cd '(if a seal bz rcqu:red', by a duly zuthor,-ed attomex--ln-~ct or a~cn:: or (iii) v,'ken cluiv executed and sealed tif a seal be requ:rcd] by one or more attorneys-in-fiat or azents uursuzn: w and w~thm Lhe hm,.ts of the authority evidenced by the Dower of attorney issued by ti;e Cornmany such parson or persons. ,,- ' ' , - . REjOLVED .rL'RTHER~ tb,:,: the signature of any authorized officer and the seal of the Compznv may bc nff:,,..d !-v - -, :::area! auti:onzmg the cxccutw:: ~md dchve~,' of any bo:'.L rcco.zr..::. u,z. or' c:i:.-r surc:}'sh:? obZ::zauons of tb.c CornDan;-: and such si,znaturc and say.! xvhcn ~o used sit:f2 h:.x-c tiic 174 VCTNiF.c V,'HEii(":".--\n:xvcs: Surer{- Insurance Ccm,.pzn}- has carsad thc:c present5 to be s:.zncd bx' iu proper cf:':ccra. and .,,~ ,, ,.-~c: "", i B. 7~AMUDi,,G:SOLI$ > Restrictions and Endorsements: ITEM NO. 3 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~'~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER ~ CITY OF TEMECULA. AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: BOARD OF DIRECTORS DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER MAY 25, 1993 TCSD PROPOSED RATES AND CHARGES FOR FY 1993-94; AND ESTABLISHING A NEW BENEFIT ZONE ENTITLED SERVICE LEVEL R PREPARED BY: ~ RECOMMENDATION: SHAWN D. NELSON, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR That the Board of Directors: Adopt Resolution #93- accepting the filing of a report on the proposed TCSD Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 19.93-94 and setting the public hearing for June 22, 1993 at 8:00 p.m. at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. o Adopt Resolution #93-. declaring the Board's intention to establish Service Level R for road construction, installation and maintenance of streets and roads and setting the public hearing for June 22, 1993 at 8:00 p.m. at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. 3. Adopt Resolution #93- Charges. __ amending the appeal process for the TCSD Rates and DISCUSSION: The Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) operates under the authority of Community Services District Law and provides parks and recreation, median and slope maintenance, street lighting and graffiti removal, and recycling and refuse collection services in the City of Temecula. The boundaries of the TCSD are contiguous with the City, and the City Council also serves as the Board of Directors of the TCSD. 3c~endl~levyrl3rt .~ln The five current service levels Of the TCSD include: 1. Community ServiCes, Parks, and Recreation Service Level A :- Arterial Street Lights, Medians, and Graffiti Removal. (NOTE: Graffiti removal has been added to Service Level A to provide an efficient, city- wide abatement program by hiring City staff and purchasing the equipment necessary to provide this service). 3. Service Level B- Residential Street Lights 4. Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance 5. Service Level D - Recycling and Refuse Collection AdditiOnally, the TCSD proposes to establish a new benefit zone entitled Service Level R to provide for the construction, installation and maintenance of streets and roads. The boundaries of Service Level R wili be contiguous with the City, however no rates and charges will be levied for Service Level R in Fiscal Year 1993-94. Finally, it is recommended that the appeal procedure for the TCSD Rates and Charges be amended to establish a deadline of July 1st for accepting appeals. Current procedure essentially allows property owners to appeal the TCSD Rates and Charges throughout the fiscal year, causing the budget amounts for each service level to fluctuate on a continual basis. If the appeal is approved, the property owner would be required to pay their property taxes and then would receive a refund of any overpayment directly from the City. The only exception would be for a hardship appeal. If approved, the appeal would be processed by amending the property tax bill. . The TCSD is required to complete an annual levy process which includes adopting a resolution accepting the filing of a report on the porposed rates and charges necessary to provide the aforementioned services; noticing every property owner in the City; and conducting a public hearing to consider approving the proposed rates and charges. Staff recommends that the Board of Directors adopt the resolution to accept the filing of the report on the proposed rates and charges for FY 1993-94, adopt the resolution to establish Service Level R, and schedule a public hearing concerning these issues for June 22, 1993. Staff will then proceed with noticing every property owner in the City regarding the proposed rates and charges and the June 22nd public hearing. 3c~mgenda~%tevyrprt.lgn , , FISCAL IMPACT: The revenue generated from the TCSD FY 1993-94 Rates and Charges will fund the parks and recreation; median and slope maintenance; street lighting and graffiti removal; and recycling and refuse collection services in the City of Temecula. No rates and charges will be levied for Service Level R in Fiscal Year 1993-94. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution of Intention for FY 1993-94 TCSD Rates and Charges Resolution of Intention establishing Service Level R Resolution to amend the appeal procedure Preliminary annual levy report for FY 1993-94 RESOLIYrION NO. A RESOLUTICN OF ~ BOARD 'OF DIRECTORS OF ~ TEIVIECUIA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ON ~ FH,ING O_~ A I~RPORT ON ~ PROPOSED RATE~ AND CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC B'R~JNG IN CONNECTION Tm~',REWITH WI-FF-~S, upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, California (the "City") effective December 1, 1989, voters also approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District (the "TCSD"), which has the same area and boundaries as the City and whose Board of Directors (the "Board") consists of the members of the City Council of the City; and WHEREAS, the TCSD proposes to continue such rams and charges for community services and parks, recreation' facilities, services and programs, operation, maintenance, service and administration of street lighting, graffiti removal, slope maintenance, recycling and refuse programs, and street and road improvements (the "Services and/or Facilities"), for those areas specifically benefitted thereby and charged by the TCSD for such services in prior fiscal years; and WHEREAS, the Board has requested the preparation of a report for Fiscal Year 1993/1994 containing the proposed rates and charges, for ~ing with the Secretary of the TCSD pursuant to the Community Services District Law being Division 3 of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 61000 (the "Act"); NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DOES HEI~h'rRY, RESOLVE, .DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Pursuant to Section 61621.2 of the Act, and Engineer's Report for Collection for the Fiscal Year 1993-94 (the "Report") has been presented and fried with the Secretary of the TCSD. The Report contains a description of the proposed Services and/or Facilities to be provided and proposed rates and charges for such Services and/or Facilities and a description of the parcels subject to rates and charges. A summary of the Report containing the proposed rates and charges is attached hereto as Exhibit A, entitled "Project Summary" and is incorporated herein by reference. The Report is based upon a budget adopted by the Board for the proposed Services and/or Facilities for specific areas where such Services and/or Facilities are provided, including necessary staff and administrative expenses. r:\C\Foraa\Rea.3 The Report is hereby preliminarily approved and adopted and is on ~e in the Office of the City Clerk. Reference W the Report is hereby made for all particulars. SECTION 2. The TCSD proposes to collect the rates and charges at the same time, in the same manner, by the same persons and together with and not separately from, the property taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shall be delinquent at the same time and thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes. All laws applicable to the levy, collection and enforcement of property taxes, including but not limited to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and is levied, the real property to which the charge relates has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien of a bona fide encumbrancer for value has bee created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the fn'st installment of such taxes appear on the roll, then the charge, or the delinquency in that charge, assessed pursuant to this section shall not result in a lien against the property; but instead shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection. Section 3. NOTICE IS I-I'F_RKI:~y GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATYER WILL BE I4~J.r~ BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMEC~ COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ON IUNE 22, 1993, AT 8:00 P.M., OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS FEASIBLE IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS LOCATED IN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER BUILDING AT 28816 PUJOL STRI~-~T, TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA. At the public hearing, the Board of Directors of the TCSD will review and consider any protests received in writing by the Secretary prior to the scheduled hearing. Public comment regarding the Report by all interested persons will be heard at the public hearing. SECTION 4. The Secretary is hereby directed to give notice of the public hearing and the filing of the Report by Publication in a newspaper of general circulation once a week for two (2) successive weeks and by first class mail to each person who owns a parcel which will be subject to such rates and charges as such names and addresses are shown in the last equaliTed roll or as known to the Secretary. r: XCXForm~Ru.3 SECTION 5. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROV~'~ AND ADOPTED this 25th day of May, 1993 TEMECULA COM1VIIrNITY SERVICES DISTRICT President ATTEST: Secretary . [SFA ] r:\CXFonmXR~.3 STATE OF CALmORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS CITY OF TEMECIJ1A ) I, , Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District, HERh'r!~y DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution __ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District on the __ day of , 1993, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: . ABSENT: DIRECTORS: DIRECTORS: DIRECTORS: Secretary r:\C~Fonns\Re~.3 EXHIBITA PROJECT SUMMARY TEIVIF_,CUIA COMMIYN1TY SERVICES DISTRICT On April 1, 1993, Municipal Financial Services was-retained by the City of Temecula to prepare the Annual Levy Report for the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) for the Fiscal Year 1993/1994. Pursuallt tO the Community Services District Law, Division 3 of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 61000 e_t seq., the TCSD has the power to levy and collect speci31 assessments in order to carry on its operations and to provide the services and facilities furnished by it. The levy and collection of the special assessments is accomplished by the assignment of benefit to each parcel within a specific service level. A Service Level is a defmed area that provides a specific service, operation and maintenance and/or program to only those parcels contained within that service level. The TCSD is currently composed of five (5) city-wide service levels and is proposing one (1) new service level. The descriptions of the service levels are as follows: Community Services. Parks and Recreation: Operations, maintenance, and' administration of the City community park systems, recreation facilities, services and programs. Service Level A - Arterial Street Li~,hts. Medians. and Graffiti Removal. Operations, maintenance, utility costs, and administration of all arterial street lights, medians, traffic signals, and city-wide graffiti removal. Service Level B - Residential Street Lights. Operations, maintenance, utility costs and administration of all residential street lights. Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance. Operations, maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and administration for all perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD. '5. Service Level D - Refuse. Collection. Recyclim,, and Street Sweeping. Operations, and administration of the refuse and recycling program, and street sweeping services for all single family residential homes. Proposed Service Level R. Construction, installation, and maintenance of streets and roads. The Financial Analysis contained herein contains each Service Level including with their totals r: \C\Forms~Re, .3 Service Level Levy Budget Community Services/Parks: Service Level A Service Level B Service Level C Service Level D Service Level R $2,531,790.00 $ 64.20 326,533.00 8.28 191,765.00 30.88 453,881.00 Variable · 1,379,730.00 165.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 TOTAL TCSD LEVY FY 93/94 $4,883,699.00 The Levy and Collection mounts for all non-exempt parcels within the TCSD for the Fiscal Year 1993/1994 are as shown on the Assessment Roll on file with the City Clerk. r:~C~Forna\h.3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF ~ BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TRY, TEMECUI. A COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ESTABLT~H. A BENEFIT ZONE ENTITLI~D SERVICE T,~.V~,T, R WITraN ITS BOUNDART~'3; AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC tTEARING IN CONNECTION Ttw, REWITH WI~,REAS, upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, California (the "City") effective December 1, 1989, voters also appmved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District (the "TCSD") which has the same area and boundaries as the City and whose Board of Directors (the "Board") consists of the members of the City Council of the City; and WI/EREAS, the TCSD currently has five (5) city-wide service levels. Each service level provides a specific service, operation, maintenance or program which benefits the TCSD. The amount of the rate and charge levied upon each property owner within the TCSD corresponds to the level of benefit each property owner derives from each service level; and WHEREAS, the public interest and convenience required the creation of a new city-wide service level within the TCSD; and WHEREAS, the TCSD proposes to establish a new service level within the TCSD pursuant to the Community Services District Law being Division 3 of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 61000 (the "Act"). NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF'THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DOES Iq'I~J~h'JIY, RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Pursuant to Section 61771 of the Act, the Board hereby declares its intent to create a new Benefit Zone to be referred to as Service Level R, within the TCSD for road construction, maintenance and installation. Section 2. The boundaries of Service Level R will be coterminous with City boundaries. Section 3. The estimated costs of the service provided by Service Level R is $0 for Fiscal Year 1993-94. r:\CXForma~Reaolum. R Section 4. NOTICE IS/th'ml~y GIVEN TI-IAT A PUBHC I.t~&RING ON TItIS MATTER WII.I. BE l:r~n BY TIlE BOARD OF DIRECTO~ OF TI-IE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICF, S DIS!'RICT ON JIjNE 22, 1993, AT 8:00 P.M., OR AS SOON TI~RFAFTF~ AS FEASIBLE iN ~ CITY COUNCIL CttAMB~ LOCATED IN TItE TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER BUII.r~ING AT28816 PUJOL STItm:~T, TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA. At the public hearing, the TCSD Board will review and consider any protests received in writing by the Secretary prior to the scheduling hearing. If fifty percent (50%) or more of the registered voters within the Service Level R boundaries, or the owners of fifty percent (50%) or more of the value of land and improvements within the Service Level R boundaries, f~e written protests, the TCSD must abandon the proceedings to create ServiCe Level R. SECTION 5. The Secretary is hereby directed to give notice of the public hearing by publication in a newspaper of general circulation once a week for two (2) successive weeks and by f'trst class mail to each person who owns a parcel which will be included in Service Level R as such names and addresses are shown in the last equalized roll as known to the Secretary. SECTION 6. The Secretary shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 251h day of May, 1993. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ATTEST: Secretary [Sea/] r: \C~Forma\R~,olum. R STATE OF CAY-rFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE · CITY OF TEMECULA ) ) ss ) I, , Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District, I-IEI~I~Y DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adoptc~ at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District on the __ day of , 1993, by the following roll call vote: AYES: DIRECTORS: NOES: DIRECTORS: DIRECTORS: Secretary r: \C~Forms\Resolum. R RESOLIR'ION NO. A RESOLUTION OF Tfff~ BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ~ 'rEMECI~A COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AM~-NDING TIFF, PROCESS FOR APPEALING ~ ADOPTION OF RATES AND CHARGES AGAINST PROPERTY WrrmN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT WHERFAS, upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, California (the "City") effective December 1, 1989, voters also approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District (the "TCSD"), which has the same area and boundaries as the City and whose Board of Directors (the "Board") consists of the members of the City Council of the City; and WHEREAS, the TCSD has annually, adopted rates and charges for community services and parks, recreation facilities, services and programs, operation, maintenance, services and administration of street lighting, slope maintenance, as well as the inclusion of rates and charges for recycling and refuse programs for those areas specifically benefitted thereby; and WHEREAS, the TCSD presently permits property owners to appeal the rates and charges against their property on the basis that the property owner disagrees with the grounds for subjecting the property owner's. land to a rate and charge or because such rate and charge would cause financial hardship on the property owner; and WHEREAS, the TCSD has prepared and kept on file, guidelines describing how property owners' may file appeals. NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DOES I-l~J~h'~y, RKSOLVE, ORDER AS FOLLOWS: THE TEMECULA DETERMINE AND SECTION 1. The TCSD Board determines that it is in the best interest of the TCSD and of the property owners within the TCSD, to require that property owner appeals to the rates and charges, be fled prior to July 1st of each Fiscal Year. SECTION 2. The TCSD Board hereby adopts Exhibit A, attached hemto, as the TCSD appeals guidelines. PASSED, APPROVRD AND ADOPTRn this 25th day of May, 1993. TEMECULA COMMLrN'iTY SERVICES DISTRICT President ATTEST: Secretary [SEAL] EXHIBIT A APPEALS PROCESS TEMECUIA COMMUNTrY SERVICES DISTRICT Appeal of Classification Where a property owner (including an individual, or business entity) subject to the rate or charge, questions the classification or application of any fiscal year's rate or charge to that property owner's property, that property owner may utilize the appeals procedures set forth below. (a) The property owner shall ~e a written pwtest in the form established for the Temecula Community Services District (the "TCSD") Secretary, stating in detail the reasons why the property owner seeks a review of the classification of the pwpeny owner's property for the fiscal year. The statement shall be accompanied by the parcel number, proof of ownership, and any other information the property owner believes to be relevant. The appeal form must be submitted to the TCSD Secretary by July 1st of each fiscal year. At the same time that each property owner subject to the rates and charges is notified of the time, place and location of the public hearing regarding the levy of rates and charges for a particular fiscal year, such property owners shall also be notified of the appeals deadline which shall in no event be later than July 1 of any fiscal year. (b) The TCSD Genex'al Manager, or his assignee, shall review the written appeal. The General Manager or his designee may request, in writing, that the property Owner provide any additional information needed to make a decision. The General Manager or his designee shall make a determination whether to grant such appeal within thirty (30) days of receipt of the completed statement, including all necessary information. The General Manager, or his assignee, shall give the property owner written notice of such determination of the appeal. (c) In the event the property owner disagrees with the General Manager's pr his assignee's determination, the property owner shall have ten (10) days to appeal that determination to the Temecula Community Services District Board of Directors (the "TCSD" Board"). The property owner 'shall file a written request for re. consideration with the TCSD Secretary, containing the information set out in subsection (a) and the reason for requesting reconsideration within the ten (10) day period. (d) Upon the receipt of a timely appeal, the TCSD Secretary shall place the matter on the agenda for the next regularly scheduled TCSD meeting. The TCSD Board shall review the written statement and General Manager's or his designee;s determination and the TCSD Board shall determine, based upon the materials before it, whether the appeal should be granted. The TCSD Board's decision shall be provided to the property owner in writing within 15 days of the TCSD Board's determination. The decision of the TCSD Board shall be final. (e) In granting such an appeal, the General Manager, his designee and the TCSD Board shall consider: (i) whether the property in whole or in part is used for the purpose intended for that classification; (ii) whether the classification adequately reflects the service received; (iii) whether the rate or charge levied on vacant property exceeds the rate or charge if the property were developed to its highest and best use; and (iv) whether uvjque or special circumstances of that property or land use regulations affecting it support a modification of the classifmation. In granting an appeal, the General Manager, his designee and the TCSD Board may reclassify the property, in whole or in'part, may grant a refund (without interest) of all or a portion of the rate or charge paid for any fiscal year and will determine for what period of time the relief granted shall be in effect. 2. Appeal for Hardship Where an individual property owner subject to payment of the rate or charge believes that payment of all or portion of the rate or charge would create a hardship for that property owner during that fiscal year, the property owner may utilize the following procedures. A hardship appeal must be renewed annually unless otherwise specifically determined by the TCSD Board. (a) The property owner shall file a written statement with the TCSD Secretary, stating in detail the reason the property owner needs such relief. The statement shall be accompanied by the parcel number, proof of ownership, and any relevant proof of hardship. The statement must be submitted to the TCSD Secretary by the deadline set by the TCSD. At the same time that each property owner subject to the rates and charges is notified of the time, place and location of the public hearing regarding the levy of rates and charges to a particular fiscal year, such property owner shall also be notified of the deadline for filing hardship appeals which shall not be later than 'July 1 of any fiscal year. (b) The General Manager' or his designee shall act on such statement in the same manner as set forth in Section 1 (b) and the General Manager's or his designee's determination may be appealed as set forth in Section 1 (c) and (d). (c) In granting a hardship appeal, the General Manager, his designee and the TCSD Board shall consider whether payment of the rate or charge during that fiscal year would adversely impact the property owner's ability to provide for the basic necessities of life. The General Manager, his designee and the TCSD Board shall determine to grant such hardship appeal on a case-by case basis by providing for the deferral of any rate or charge to a subsequent fiscal year. ! !MFS CITY OF TEMECULA PRELIMINARY ANNUAL LEVY REPORT TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 199311994 MAY 1993 MUN[ FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. 28765 SingJe OaR Dr., Second Roor Temecula, CA 92590 Tel: (909) 699-3990 Fax: (909) 699-3460 3727 Buchanan, Suite 202 San Francisco, CA 94123 Tel: (415) 441-3550 Fax: (415) 441-1401 M FS TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................1 A. Introduction ......................................................; .................................1 B. Description of the Distdct and Services .............................................1 DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT ...................................................................3 CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT .........................................................................5 A. Annexations .......................................................................................5 B. Modifications of the District Structure ................................................5 C. District Budget Changes ..................................................... ................5 DISTRICT BUDGETS ........................................................................................6 METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT .....................................................................8 Appendix A - LAND USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS ............... 10 Appendix B - 1993194 COLLECTION ROLL: ........................................11 M FS OVERVIEW A. :ntroducUon The Temecula Community Services District ("District") was formed in 1989 upon incorporation of the City to continue services previously provided by the County. The City collects special rates and charges in order to provide services and maintain the improvements within the District. The District has been formed and the rates and charges established pursuant to Section 61621 of the Government Code. Be This Report describes the proposed rates and charges per parcel for Fiscal Year 1993/94 based on the historical and estimated cost to provide services and maintain improvements that provide a benefit to properties within the District. Each parcel charged receives direct benefit from the District. For the purposes of this Report, wherever the word "parcel" is used, it refers to an individual property assigned its own assessment number. The County Auditor/Controller uses assessment numbers when identifying those properties that are charged for special district benefits. A public hearing will be held to allow the public an opportunity to hear and be heard regarding the District. After the public hearing, the Board of Directors may order the modification of this Report. After approval of this Report, as submitted or as modified, the Board shall order the levy and collection of rates and charges for Fiscal Year 1993/94. In such case, the rate and charge information will be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The County Auditor/Controller will include the rates and charges on the property tax roll for Fiscal Year 1993/94. Description of the District and Services The District provides certain serVices and the maintenance of specific improvements within public rights-of-way and dedicated landscape easements throughout the City. The District consists of six separate service levels providing services within certain areas throughout the City. Each parcel is grouped within one or more service levels based upon its location and the quantity and type of services provided within that area. Each service level has differing costs depending upon the various services providing benefits to the parcels within the level. Each parcel is charged its fair share of the costs of the services providing benefit. Services and improvements provided include the construction and maintenance of community parks, recreation programs, street lighting, graffiti removal, median landscape maintenance, perimeter landscape maintenance, slope protection, a recycling and refuse collection program, and road improvement construction and maintenance. Table I below lists the various Service Levels within the District along with the total levy budget, charge per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU) as compared to the 1992/93 fiscal year, along with the 1993/94 total EDU, and the total number of parcels within each Service Level. TABLE I SERVICE LEVELS SERWCE LEVEL Community Services, Parks, and Recreation Service Level A Arterial Street Lighting, Nledtar~, GraffYd Service Level B Residential Street Lighting Service Level C Local Landscaping and Slopes: Rate Level # 1 Rate Level # 2 Rate Level # 3 Rate Level # 4 Service Level D Citywide Recy__c_lin_g and Refuse Service Level R Roads 192,650 'l ~{ 96,162 ,~ 98.040 ., 233,953 $1,250,365 4.18 30.88 326,533 191,765 8.28 30.88 $5.90 4.1o 0 50.00 i; 26,150 50.00 0 93.0o i: 83,235 ~ 93.00 o 120.oo i: 168,36o i 120.00 0 179.00 ~! 176,136; 179.00 0 $159.1'~. 1,379,730: 165.00 5.88 $0 $0.00 N/A Total EDU : Parcels per Level: per Level 39,435.94 ' 14,362 39,435.94 ~. 14,362 6,210 i 6,210' 523 523 895 895 1,403 1,403 984 984 8,362 8,362 Exhibit A below illustrates the relationship of those parcels located within each of the six Service Levels. EXHIBIT A PARCELS BY SERVICE LEVEL 15000 ..... ' 10000 5000, CSP L/ , /; , -/ ,/-' LEVEL A LEVEL B LEVEL C LEVEL D LEVEL R 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT A description of the current Service Levels within the District is listed below. Community Services, Parks, and Recreation includes maintenance, service, and operations of all public parks in the District. Most park construction is provided either by Developers as a condition of their residential projects or Development Impact Fees. This Service Level also allows for the construction of the Community Recreation Center and its debt service. In addition, this Service Level provides funding for the various recreation programs throughout the City. The following is a list of some of the City's Parks and Recreation facilities: · Rancho California Sports Park · Sam Hicks Monument Park · Veterans Park · Bahia Vista Park oCalle Aragon Park · Teen Recreation Center · Senior Center · Community Recreation Center °Loma Linda Park · Riverton Park · Presley Park "A" · Presley Park "B" · Park Site at Paloma Del Sol Service Level A, Arterial Street Lighting, Medians, and Greffiti Removal provides a benefit to all parcels within the City through the servicing, operation, and maintenance of street lighting and landscaped medians along arterial streets. A program for the removal of graffiti throughout the City has also been initiated within this Service Level. Service Level B, Residential Street Lighting provides a benefit to all single family residential and vacant parcels within those tracts requiring servicing, operation, and maintenance of local street lighting. Service Level C, Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes provides the servicing, operation, and maintenance of perimeter landscaped areas and slopes within the public right of way and dedicated easements within certain tracts. The level of maintenance required within these tracts varies depending on operating costs and therefore, four Rate Levels have been established. 3 (! M FS Table II below shows a breakdown of the Tracts composing each Rate Level within Service Level C, Local Landscaping and Slopes. TABLE II Service Level C Tracts ;Rate Level #1 ~Tract Name !Tact # ~ Presley Development :23267-0 ;23267-1 ................................ 23267-4 26861-1 26861-2 Rancho Solana i22593,-0 22593-1 22593-2 The Vineyards '20879-0 20879-1 $50.00 ~Rate. Levei tr2 ractN,m. i; ~Winchester Creek ~;Woodcrest Country !$e3;00~ Rate LeVel !Tract # , !Tract Name ;20735-7 Martinique !20735-9 Saddlewood :20881-0 ,21764-0 20130-0 The Summit 20130-1 20130-2 20130-3 20130-4 Vintage Hills 20130-5 20130-6 !21340-0 :21340-1 i21340-2 ~21340-3 121561 i22208 $120.00 !!Rate Level #4 $179.00 ~Tract # 'i~ract Name Tract # i23218 ~!Meadowview 21765 ~18518-0 iiSignet Series 20882-0 ' ~, '20882-1 18518-3 it : 20882-2 :20643 ~; ~20882-3 ;20643-4 Village Grove 21672-1 22203 ,2167~-'2~ ..... ;22203-4 ii ~21672-3 ; 2271 5.0 !~ .21672-4 r22715-2 li ;21674-1 !22716-0 i~ ;21674-2 :22716-1 ~,} :21674-3 :22? 16-3 i~ '216?5-2 22716-4 !! :21675-3 229150 i; :21675-4 22915-1 ,.; 21675.5 22915-3 Service Level D, Citywide Recycling and Street Sweeping provides the operations and administration of the refuse and recycling program and street sweeping services for all single family residential homes. Service Level R, Roads includes the construction and maintenance of streets and roads throughout the City. 4 'MFS CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT For Fiscal Year 1993194, changes within the District that affect the levy are outlined below. A. Annexations Annexations to Service Level C, Local Landscaping and Slopes are the parcels within Tracts 22916-0, 22916-1, 22916-2, 22916-3 (Vintage Hills) and Tracts 26861-1, 26861-2, 23267-0, 23267-1 and 23267-4 (Presley Development). Modifications of the District Structure A new Service Level, Service Level R (Roads) has been added. This Service Level will provide funding for construction and maintenance of public streets and roads throughout the City. No charges are proposed within Service Level R for this fiscal year. District Budget Changes The Community Services, Parks and Recreation Service Level rates have increased due to the operations and maintenance costs of the Community Recreation Center, as wells as several neighborhood and community parks that will be added to the City's park system. The budget for Service Level A, Street Lighting, Medians, and Graffiti Removal has increased due to the addition of graffiti removal services throughout the City. Service Level D has increased due to an increase in the County landfill dumping costs and normal Consumer Price Index (CPI)increases. 5 DISTRICT BUDGETS TABLE Ill 1993/94 DISTRICT BUDGETS !TEMECULA COMMUNITY SEI~VlCES DISTRICT iOPERATING BUDGET DEPARTMENT SUMMARY !FOR THE YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1993 ':PERSONNEL SERVICES ' Number of Staff :'Salaries and Wages !:PERS Retirement .'State Unemployment 'Mealcare FICA :Auto Allowance : Unemployment Training Tax !Workers Compensation )Health Benefits Pan-Time (Project) Part-Time Retirement Compensated Absences Total Personnel Services Acct. Number 5100 5102. 5103' 5104; 5106: 5109f 5112: 5113; 5119[ 5120! 5126! Commurljty SerViceS OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE ! Teid~hone Service (i2iiiiGlar) ' 5208 ReO'a;r & MiTnt~- ~ici"iit,es 5212~ Maintenance Supplies 5218 Office Supplies 5220, $19.000! Printing 5222 $30,000! Legal Documents/Maps 5224- $2.000; Dues and Membershi0s 5226! $2,500! Pubhcat~ons 5228 $1.000: 'PoSid~'ai' pi~.~aii~' ........... 5230: $e,oooi Rent - Office 5234. $33,750 Rent - Eqmpment 5238 $13.000: Equipment Lease 5239 $10,380~ 190i 13.001 $65,069! $17,021~ $6,625! $23,736I $82,320} $139,558i $5.235~ $5.616i $804,927.. $11.000i $116,000 Utilities Small tools/Equipment 'Uniforms signs Legil 'S~7~i ............... Consulting Services Other Outside Services Advertising 5240 $186,969! 5242: $10,000~ 5243, $6,000; 5244, $4.000; 5246: $15,000! 5248: 5250: $243,950i 5254' $5,000: Level A Level B 191 192; 0.45 0.55! $$4,638i $19,239: $7,782i $2.740~ $2,404~ $847' $792~ $279 $55~ $19~ $6,174~ $189 $12,446! $2.940, $84,291 ! Level C 193;~ 2.00; i., $47,117; $6,710~ $2,073~ $683: $17.000 $8.000: $15,000, $3,208 '. $9,114i $26,253 $68,952. $0' $0 Level D Level R Total $577,884 $82.301 $22.345 $8.379 $2,400 $578 $33,307 $106,820 $139,558! $5,235 $5.616 $984,423' $11,000 $116,000 $17.000 $19.000 $30,000 $2,000 $2,500 $1,000 $6,000 $33,750 $13,000 $10,380 $115,473 $31;J,442 $25,000 $6,000 $4,000 $15,000 $0 $243,950 $5,000 6 iiTEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT t:OPERATING BUDGET DEPARTMENT SUMMARY FOR THEi YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1993 I: I;OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE ~Public Notices ~Conference Education }~Meetings in Town i~M leage !Recreation Supplies i~Arterial Street Lighting iiLandscape Maintenance i~Assessment Administration ~iWaste Hauling iCIP Assistant Engineer !~City Administration Charges i:Total Operations and Maintenance 'INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS ;.;Liability Insurance :Vehicles Information Systems .Copy Center 7Facilities ziTotal Internal Services ~:CAPITAL OUTLAY Office Fum~smngs Office EQuspment Vehicles Equipment :CIP - Projects Bond Proceeds 'Total ~ap:tal Outlay ~RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCY JTOTAL DISTRICT BUDGET ,'RECREATION REVENUE BALANCE TO LEVY iCommunity, I Services Acct. j Number ~ 190 CONTINUED 5256; $1,ooo! 52581 $8;oooj 5260! $2,000i 52621 $3,500} 5263! $4,000I 5268; $500J r 5300! $143,507I 5500; 5525! $20,000{ 5535! New ! $58,307 55401 $155.293~ ' $1,111,656~ i I $37 458~ , $26,556j . $68,480 $22.613~ ; $89.600; ~ $244,707 5600; $15,000; 5602i $5o000~ 5608', 5610', $22.000i 5901 $505.000~ $547,0001 $2.708.290i 176,500: $2,531,7901 Level A 191 $10,500i $133,542~ $8,000i $192,042! $45,000; $5,200~ $50,200 i 0t $326,533i $326,533, Level B 192! $165,512~ $165,512: 0~ $191,765 $191,765! Level C Level D 193! $269,4561 ~ $1,419,0001 I $384.929i $1,419,000~ $453,881~ $1,419,000~ I $453,881i $1,379,730! Level R $0: $0i Tdtal $1,000 $8,000 $2,000 $3,500.: $14,500: $500. $143,507' $299,054.: $277,456 $20,000' $1,419,000 $58,307 $155,293 $37,458: $26,556: $68,480 $22,613 $89,600 $15,000 $5,000 $45,000 $27,200 $0 $505,000 $5,099.469 $O $5,099,469 $4,883,699 7 -: METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT As in past years, the cost to provide services within the Distdct will be fairly distributed among each assessable property based upon the estimated benefit received by.each property. The beneffi formula used is based upon the land use and size of a property. Each property is assigned an Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) factor that reflects the property's land use and degree of benefit. Please refer to Appendix A for a complete listing of land use codes and their associated EDU. The following is the formula used to calculate each property's District charges. Parcel EDU X Acres or Units X Charge per EDU = Parcel Charge Table tV below reflects the levy calculations for various property types for each Service Level. Property Type TABLE IV PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES, PARKS, AND RECREATION Single Family Residential Multi Family Residential Agricultural Single Family Vacant Non-Residential Vacant Non-Residential Improved Parcel X Charge = Parcel EDU per Charge EDU 1.00 $64.20 $64.20 0.75 $64.20 $48.15 0.50 $64.20 $32.10 2.00 $64,20 $128.40 4.00 $64.20 $256.80 6.00 $64.20 $385.20 Multiplier Per Unit Per Unit Per Acre Per Acre Per Acre Per Acre 8 ;?! M FS Property Type Single Family Residential Multi Family Residential Agricultural Single Family Vacam Non-Residential Vacant Non-Residential Improved :Parcel X Charge EDU per EDU PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL A, Parcel Charge 1.00 $8.28 $8.28 0.75 $8.28 $6,21 0.50 $8.28 $4.14 2.00 $8.28 $18.56 4.00 $8.28 $33.12 6.00 $8.28 $49.68 Multiplier Per Unit ' Per Unit Per Acre Per Acre Per Acre Per Acre Single Family Residential PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL B 1.00 S30.88 $30.88 Per Unit PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL C Single Family Residential Rate C-1 Single Family Residential Rate C-2 Single Family Residential Rate C-3 Single Family Residential Rate C-4 1.00 $50.00 $50,00 1,00 $93.00 $93.00 1.00 $120.00 $120.00 1.00 $179.00 $179,00 Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL D Single Family Residential 1.00 $165.00 $165.00 Per Unit 9 MFS Appendix A - LAND USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS 'Pro~rty type Single Family Residential Multi Family Residential ~ Agricultural i: Single Family Vacant i: !i i, ii Non-Residential Vacant . Non-Residential Improved 1993/94 :' Equivalent Dwelling Unit 1.00 0.75 0.50 2.00 4.00 6.00 Mulb?31ier : Units Units Acres Acres Acres Acres 10 Appendix B - 1993/94 COLLECTION ROLL Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the County Assessor's map for the year in which this Report is prepared. Non-assessable lots or parcels include govemment-owned land, public utility- owned property, and land principally encumbered by public rights-of-way. A listing of parcels within this District, along with the charges, has been submitte.d to the Clerk of the City and, by reference, is made part of this report. 11 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AG'ENCY ITEM 1 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members FROM: Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer DATE: May 25, 1993 SUBJECT: Combining Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1993 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1993 RECOMMENDATION: That the 'Agency Members receive and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1993 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1993. DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited activity of the Redevelopment Agency for the nine months ended March 31, 1993. Please see the attached financial statements for analytical review of financial activity. ATTACHMENTS: Combining Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1993' Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1993 V:\WP~RDAREVE,AGN E ~*~ ~*~ ·