HomeMy WebLinkAbout091499 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will
enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104
ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
SEPTEMBER 14, 1999- 7:00 P.M.
At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M.
6:30" P.M. - Closed Session of the City. Council and the Redevelopment= Agency, in the
Main Conference Room, pursuant to Government Code. Sections:
.Conference with real. property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Session
54956.8 concerning the acquisition of real. property located at 42291 Sixth Street
(APN 922-051-011 ). The negotiating parties are the Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Temecula and Mr. Ciais. Under negotiation are the price and terms of
payment of the real property interests proposed to be acquired. The Agency
negotiators are Shawn Nelson, James O'Grady, and John Meyer.
m
Conference with City Attorney and legal. counsel pursuant to Government Code
Sedtion 54956.9(b) with respect to one matter of potential litigation. With respect
to this matter, the City Attorney has determined that a point has been reached
where there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City based on
existing facts and circumstances.
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 99-24
Resolution: No. 99-87
CALL TO ORDER:
Prelude Music:
Inland Valley Youth Symphony directed by Dr. Seymour Rubenstein
Invocation:
Rabbi Yitzchok Hurwitz of Chabad of Temecula Valley
Flag Salute:
Mayor Pro Tem Stone
ROLL CALL:
Comerchero, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Ford
R:~,genda\091499
1
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Introduction of the Voorbur.q Banker Delegation
Recognition of Officer Pino
Presentation of the Good Samaritan Award
Certificate of Achievement for Ea.ale Scout
F.A.S.T. Presentation
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on
items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on
an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a
pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak"
form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item. There is a
five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made
at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the
agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of June 29, 1999;
2.2 Approve the minutes of July 13, 1999;
R:%Agenda\091499
2
3
4
7
2.3 Approve the minutes of July 27, 1999.
Resolution Approvin.q List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
City Treasurer's Report as of July 31, 1999
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of July 31, 1999.
Financial Statements for the Year ended June 30, 1999
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for the Year ended June 30, 1999.
Purchase of Three (3) City Vehicles (TCSD, Buildin.q and Safety, and Fire)
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve the purchase of three (3) Ford model year 2000 vehicles from Villa Ford for
the total amount of $63,578.25.
Support for Senate Bill 3 (Rainey) - Libran/Construction Bond
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SUPPORTING SENATE BILL 3 {RAINEY)
ADDRESSING THE ISSUANCE OF LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION
BONDS FOR CALIFORNIA LIBRARIES
R:~Agenda\091499
3
8 Approval of Funds for Landscape Review Services
9
10
11
12
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Approve an expenditure in an amount not to exceed $105,000 for landscape review
services with PELA.
Development Impact Fee A.qreement with Woodside Homes - Lon.q Canyon Creek
Park/Tract 28510-1 (Campos Verdes Specific Plan)
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1
Approve the Development Impact Fee Agreement between the City of Temecula
and Woodside Homes to establish preliminary fee credits in the amount of $358,530
for the construction of Long Canyon Creek Park, Lot 81 of Tract No. 28510-1.
Completion and Acceptance for the Median Islands on Winchester Road west of Jefferson
Avenue - Project No. PW97-21
RECOMMENDATION:
10. 1 Accept the project Median Islands on Winchester Road west of Jefferson Avenue -
Project No. PW97-21 as complete;
10.2 File a Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a six-
months (6) Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
10.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing the Notice of
Completion if no liens have been filed.
Completion and Acceptance for the I-15 Southbound Off-Ramp Widenin.q at Winchester
Road - Project No. PW97-03
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Accept the project for the 1-15 Southbound Off-Ramp Widening at Winchester Road
- Project No. PW97-03 as complete;
11.2 File a Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year
(1) Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
11.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing the Notice of
Completion if no liens have been filed.
Acceptance of Park Landscape Bonds and A.qreement for Tract No. 28510-1 - Woodside
Chantemar, Inc. - North General Kearney Road at Margarita Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Accept the agreement and surety bonds from Woodside Chantemar, Inc. to improve
the park site within Tract No. 28510-1.
R:~Agenda\091499
4
13 Tract Map No. 24183-1 (located north of Campanula Way, east of Meadows Parkway,
west of Butterfield Stage Road, and south of DePortola Road and within Paloma Del Sol
Specific Plan No. 219)
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Approve Tract Map No. 24183-1 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval;
13.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement;
13.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful
Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond and Monument Bond as security for
the agreements.
14 Tract Map No. 24183 (located north of Campanula Way, east of Meadows Parkway, west
of Butterfield Stage Road, and south of De Portola Road and within Paloma Del Sol
Specific Plan No. 219)
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Approve Tract Map No. 24183 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval;
14.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement;
14.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful
Performance Bond, Labor and Matedal Bond and Monument Bond as security for
the agreements.
15 Release Faithful Performance Warranty Security for Public Improvements in Parcel Map
No. 24085-3 (located northwesterly of the intersection of Diaz Road and Zevo Drive -
Avenida de Ventas)
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Authorize release of the Faithful Performance Warranty security for Public
Improvements in Parcel Map No. 24085-3;
15.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
16 Release Faithful Performance Warranty Secudty for Public Improvements in Parcel Map
No. 24085-F (located northwesterly of the intersection of Diaz Road and Zevo Drive
(formerly Avenida de Ventas)
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Authorize release of the Faithful Performance Warranty Security for the public
improvements in Parcel Map No. 24085-F;
16.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
R:~,genda\091499
5
17
18
19
20
21
Release Faithful Performance Warranty Security in Parcel Map 27714 ('located at the east
side of Ynez Road between Solana Way and Rancho California Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Authorize release of the Faithful Performance Warranty Security in Parcel Map No.
27714;
17.2 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the developer and surety.
Release Securities for Faithful Performance Warranty for Public Improvements and
Traffic Si.qnalization Miti.qation fees in Tract No. 21818 (located westerly of the intersection
of Via Norte at Kahwea Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Authorize release of the Securities for the Faithful Performance Warranty for the
Public Improvements in Tract No. 21818;
18.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
Approval of an Additional Expenditure for FY98-99 Street Stripin.q Contract - Pacific
Stripin.q, Inc.
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Approve the additional expenditure to FY98-99 contract with Pacific Striping, Inc.
increasing the contract amount by $17,815.00.
Award of Construction Contract for the Traffic Si.qnal and Median Modification at Rancho
California Road and Town Center Drive - Project No. PW99-09
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1
Award a contract for the Traffic Signal and Median Modification at Rancho California
Road and Town Center Drive - Project No. PW99-09 - to DBX, Inc. for $47,740.00
and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract;
20.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $4,774.00, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
Supersedin.q Freeway A.qreement for State Hi.clhwav Route 15 within the City of
Temecula
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R AAgenda\091499
6
21.2
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING A SUPERSEDING FREEWAY
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION (STATE) AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DECLARING THAT CERTAIN SECTION OF STATE HIGHWAY
ROUTE 15 BETWEEN THE SOUTH TEMECULA CITY LIMIT
AND THE NORTH TEMECULA CITY LIMIT TO BE A FREEWAY
Approve an Agreement declaring that certain section of State Highway Route 15
between the Southern and Northern Temecula City limits to be a freeway with the
State of California Department of Transportation (State) and authorize the Mayor to
execute the Amendment.
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF
THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AND
THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
R :~,genda\091499
7
i TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. CSD 99-01
Resolution: No. CSD 99-14
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS:
PUBLIC COMMENTS
President Jeff Comerchero
Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Comerchero
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of
Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to
Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of July 13, 1999;
1.2 Approve the minutes of July 27, 1999.
2 Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 1999
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year ended June 30,
1999.
R:~Agenda\091499
8
3 Award of Construction Contract for Butterfield Stage Park Improvements -
Project No. PW98-01CSD
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Award a construction contract for Butterfield Stage Park Improvements - Project
No. PW98-01CSD to JDC, Inc. in amount of $35,007.50 and authorize the
President to execute the contract;
3.2 Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $3,500.75 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
4 Park and Slope Area Tree Trimmin.q Maintenance Services Contract
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Award the Tree Maintenance Services contract to West Coast Arborists, Inc. for
$50,000.00;
4.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $5,000 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
5 City of Temecula Wall of Honor
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve a procedure for the establishment and continuing operation of the
City of Temecula Wall of Honor.
6 Mobile Recreation Program Update
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Receive and file a report on the Mobile Recreation Program known as Rec
R.O.C.K.s.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting: Tuesday, September 28, 1999, at 7:00 P.M., scheduled to follow the City Council
Consent Calendar, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\091499
9
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL
Chairman Lindemans
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. RDA 99-01
Resolution: No. RDA 99-13
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Comerchero, Ford, Roberts, Stone, Lindemans
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the
Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent
Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the
Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of July 13, 1999;
1.2 Approve the minutes of July 27, 1999.
2 Purchase and Sale A.qreements for Residential Sites in the Pujol Area
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R:%Agenda\091499
10
2.2
2.3
2.4
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED
PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW
INSTRUCTIONS FOR ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 28735 PUJOL STREET IN THE CITY
OF TEMECULA
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED
PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW
INSTRUCTIONS FOR ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 28496 PUJOL STREET IN THE CITY
OF TEMECULA
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED
PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW
INSTRUCTIONS FOR ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 28516 PUJOL STREET IN THE CITY
OF TEMECULA
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED
PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW
INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE 28500 BLOCK OF PUJOL
STREET (APN 922-053-008) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA
Temecula Redevelopment A.clencv Financial Statements for the Year ended
June 30, 1999
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Receive and file the Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year ended June 30,
1999.
R:~Agenda\091499
11
4
Approve the Manufacturin.cl and Purchase of Freeway Si.qnage for Old Town Front
Street on I-15 - Project No. PW99-08
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Approve the manufacturing and purchase of freeway guide sign panels for use
on I-15 to Safeway Sign Company of Adelanto, California, in the amount of
$35,305.75 (including sales tax);
4.2
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed a
contingency amount of $3,194.25 which is equal to the balance of the
appropriated funds and 9% of the purchase amount;
4.3
Approve an appropriation of $30,000.00 from Redevelopment Agency
Unreserved Fund Balance to the project account.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting: Tuesday, September 28, 1999, at 7:00 P.M., scheduled to follow City Council
Consent Calendar, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\091499
12
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval
of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in
court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised
at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at,
or prior to, the public hearing.
22 Development Code Amendment (Planning Application No. PA99-0197)
RECOMMENDATION:
22.1 Approve the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA99-0197;
22.2 Introduce and mad by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF TITLE
17 TO RE-CATEGORIZE TEMPORARY USES, AMEND YARD
AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSORY
STRUCTURES IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES, CLARIFY FLOOR
AREA RATIO BONUS PROVISIONS, AND MAKE NUMEROUS
MINOR MODIFICATIONS TO TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0197)
23 General Plan Land Use Amendment No. 3 (Plannin.cl Application No. PA99-0291)
RECOMMENDATION:
23.1 Approve the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA99-0291;
23.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
MAP FOR VARIOUS AREAS THROUGHOUT THE CITY
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 921-660-026, 921-
660-027, 921-660-041, AND 921-660-042 (PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA99-0291 )
R:~Agenda\091499
13
24
23.3 Introduce and mad by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA FOR THE AREAS KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NOS. 921-660-026, 921-660-027, 921-660-041, 921-
660-042, AND 950-120-004 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA99-0291 )
An Appeal of the PlanninQ Commission's decision to deny PlanninQ Application No. PA99-
0236, Development Plan Revision to reconfiQure a part of the Winchester Meadows
ShoppinQ Center, and PlanninQ Application No. PA99-0012, a Conditional Use Permit to
build and operate a 5,310 square foot Winston Tire Store (located at the northwest comer
of MarQadta Road and Winchester Road
RECOMMENDATION:
24.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DENYING THE APPEAL OF PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA99-0236 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN
REVISION-APPEAL) AND PA99-0012 (CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT-APPEAL) UPHOLDING THE PLANNING
COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY PLANNING
APPLICATION PA99-0236, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVISION
PROPOSAL TO RECONFIGURE A PORTION OF THE
WINCHESTER MEADOWS SHOPPING CENTER BY
INCORPORATING AN ABANDONED WELL SITE AND
RELOCATING AND ENLARGING TWO UNDEVELOPED PAD
SITES TOTALING 1.3 ACRES; AND PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA99-0012, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN
AND CONSTRUCTION OF A 5,310 SQUARE FOOT
COMMERCIAL BUILDING ON .7 OF AN ACRE AND A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE OPERATION OF AN
AUTOMOTIVE TIRE AND SERVICE STORE LOCATED ON THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND
WINCHESTER ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NOS. 911-170-091 AND 911-170-098 AND PARCEL 4 OF
PARCEL MAP 28934
R:V~,genda\091499
14
COUNCIL BUSINESS
25 Consideration of the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival Sponsorship ReQuest
RECOMMENDATION:
25.1
25.2
Review and approve the funding for the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival
in the amount of $30,000;
Approve the sponsorship agreement with the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine
Festival organization and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement.
26 Murrieta Creek - Arundo and Tamadsk Eradication
RECOMMENDATION:
26.1 Provide direction to staff to work with the appropriate public agencies to develop a
plan to eradicate Arundo and Tamadsk growth in Murrieta Creek from Cherry Street
at the northern City limit to Temecula Creek at the southern City limit in exchange
for habitat mitigation credits;
26.2 Approve a general eradication program to include an initial eradication effort and 3
to 5 years of follow-up maintenance to start in fiscal year 2000.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting: Tuesday, September 28, 1999, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\091499
15
PROCLAMATIONS
AND
PRESENTATIONS
ITEM
1
ITEM 2
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 29, 1999
The Open Session of the City Council meeting convened at 6:00 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Absent:
INVOCATION
Councilmembers:
Comerchero, Lindemans, Roberrs, Stone, and
Ford.
Councilmember: None.
The invocation was given by Councilman Lindemans.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Councilman Roberrs.
CITY COUNCIL/COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT/AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
REPORTS
No reports given.
PUBLIC HEARING
Approval of a Miti.qated Ne.qative Declaration for the construction and operation of sports
Field li.qhtin.q at James L. Day Middle School
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
Approve a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the construction of sports field
lighting at James L. Middle School;
1.2
Direct staff to file the Mitigated Negative Declaration with the appropriate filing fee
for the project with the County Clerk of Records Office.
By way of overheads and a video tape, Community Services Director Parker presented the staff
report (as per agenda material); referenced future homes that will be built around the project site; in
light of the required preparation time, addressed the issue of competing hours for high school sports
and City-promoted After School activities; and noted that the City would not be installing a public
address system at the project site.
Referencing the lighting system installed at Margarita Park, Mr. Rich Wagner of Musco Lighting
further elaborated on the system that is being proposed for James L. Day Middle School; advised
that the height of the lights at Margarita Park are between 70' to 90'; and further commented on
engineering measures that could be undertaken to ensure elimination of off-site lighting.
At this time, Mayor Ford opened the public hearing.
R :~Agenda\062999CIP
1
Ms. Rebecca Weersing, 41775 Yorba Avenue, spoke in support of the proposed lighting.
In light of the need for additional field space, Ms. Cheryl Joyce, 40255 Benwood Court, spoke in
support of the lights.
In order to provide alternative activities for the children, Mr. Henry Miller, 29240 Stonewood Road,
~47, spoke in support of the lights.
Mr. Bill Barber, 31172 Wellington Circle, President of Temecula Little League, commented on the
need for additional field space and, therefore, spoke in support of the lights.
Mr. John Martin, 45414 Clubhouse Drive, encouraged the City to continue its work relationship with
the School District and spoke in support of the lights.
Ms. Teresa Cota, 30359 Deer Meadow, representing the Temecula Little League, echoed the need
for additional field space and as well supported the installation of the lights.
Mr. Mike Pagano, 32383 Corte Porado, as well concurred with the need for additional field space
and encouraged the City Council to approve the installation of the lighting.
Commenting on the City's phenomenal growth rate, Mr. Thomas Langley, 32050 Calle Marquis,
addressed the need for additional sports facilities and, therefore, spoke in support of the lights.
Living near a lighted facility such as the one being proposed, Mr. Langley noted that it has not had a
negative impact on his quality of life.
The following individuals echoed the above-mentioned comments and expressed their support of
the lights:
· Mr. David Stovall
· Mr. Jack Henz
· Mr. James SpineIll
31093 Lahontan Street
42835 Villa Terrace
35120 Calle Nopal
Appreciating the joint use projects that have been created between the City and the Temecula
Valley Unified School District, Mr. Rick Shafer, 40377 Calle Medusa, spoke in support of this
lighting project as well as the construction of the swimming pool at Chaparral High School.
Mr. Dave Gallaher, representing the Temecula Valley Unified School District, 40516 Roripaugh
Road, relayed Superintendent Allmen's support of the project as well as his concurrence with this
type of usage at elementary or middle schools. For Councilman Comerchero, Mr. Gallaher
confirmed that in addition to the required public address system at the schools, no additional public
address system would be installed for ballfields.
Although relaying his support of parks, Mr. David Cabattoni, 29560 Avenida del Sol, Meadowview
resident, expressed concern with the potential installation of a public address system at the project
site and noted his opposition to issues raised in the Environmental Impact Report with regard to
noise, traffic, lighting, and the impact on wildlife.
Voicing no objection to the proposed lights, Ms. Kathleen Roe, 29611 Avenida del Sol, expressed
opposition to any potential installation of a public address system.
R :~Agenda\062999CIP
2
In an effort to retain the uniqueness of the Meadowview community, Ms. Helen Hubka, 29830
Puesta Del Sol, spoke in opposition to the installation of the lights.
Although not opposing a facility such as the one being proposed, Mr. Steve Chamberlin, Via Norte,
relayed his opposition to the proposed project because of the impact it will have on Meadowview
residents with regard to light and sound.
For the future 242 homes that will be constructed nearby the proposed site, Mr. Nate Pugsley,
representing Woodside Homes of California, Inc., 23121 Antonio Parkway, Suite 120, Rancho
Santa Margarita, spoke in opposition to the installation of the lights and encouraged the City
Council to adhere to its previous action of denial.
Addressing concerns with regard to uniqueness of the community, rural environment, quality of life,
light, sound, traffic, the following individuals spoke in opposition to the proposed lights:
· Ms. Sue Moriki
· Devon Ronie
· Andrew Ronie
40445 Carmelite Circle
40575 La Colina
40575 La Colina
In order to accommodate the need for additional field space, Mr. Thomas Quinn, 42935 Corte
Cabello, spoke in support of the lights.
Having supported the installation of the lights at the May 25, 1999, City Council meeting,
Councilman Comerchero relayed his continuous support of the lights. Although the lights may have
a nominal impact to residents in Meadowview, Mr. Comerchero noted that this park is not located in
the Meadowview community. In light of the need for additional field space as a result of the City's
continuous growth in population, Councilman Comerchero reiterated his support of the project and
assured the residents that no public address system would be installed.
Although living in Meadowview, Councilman Roberrs advised that the City Attorney has informed
him that because he lives more than 800' from the proposed site, he would be able to participate in
this matter. In light of on-going growth and development in nearby areas, Mr. Roberts noted that
such growth has impacted the rural environment of the Meadowview area. Because he was elected
to represent the entire City, Councilman Roberts relayed his opposition to the installation of a public
address system but noted his support of the installation of lights.
As a proponent of youth sports as well as controlled growth, Mayor Pro Tem Stone noted that the
Meadowview streets were designed as rural streets and, therefore, are unable to withstand the
amount of traffic the proposed facility would create for the neighborhood. Mr. Stone commented on
the current cut-through traffic experienced in the Meadowview area and its safety concerns and
noted how this problem would be increased with the proposed project. He, therefore, spoke in
opposition to the lights but relayed his support of the construction of a sports facility at a different
location.
Opposing the proposed site for the installation of lights, Councilman Lindemans commented on the
impact such a facility would have on the Meadowview community as it relates to traffic and potential
safety concerns. Mr. Lindemans spoke in support of a facility such as the one in Cathedral City and
spoke in opposition to the proposed request.
Having visited the area of discussion, Mayor Ford noted that, in his opinion, the proposed project
would have an impact on the Meadowview community. Concurring with the need for additional field
R:~,genda\062999CIP
3
space, Mayor Ford suggested the exploration of utilizing property at the north and south end of the
City.
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to deny staff recommendation. The motion was
seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of
Councilmen Comerchero and Roberts who voted n._9o.
At 7:26 P.M., Mayor Ford called a recess and reconvened the meeting at 7:42 P.M.
PRESENTATION
Bi.q Leaflue Dreams Sports Park - Rick Odekirk (as requested by Mayor Pro Tem Stone)
By way of a video presentation, Mr. Rick Odekirk, 43670 Lisbon Way, provided a detailed overview
of a Big League Dreams Sports Park, highlighting the following:
· Current Big League Dreams Sports Parks
· Upcoming Parks
· Feasibility Studies
Further addressing the operations of his facilities, Mr. Odekirk noted the following:
· Security - fully fenced with a one-gate entrance; six security guards at any one time;
gate policy, no food permitted;
· Cathedral City facility provides three major league stadium replicas and two minor
league stadium replicas; other fields would be available (sand volleyball, soccer, batting
cage, basketball, instructional school, and corporate area);
· League play (adult and youth)
· Tournaments/special events, corporate events, camps/clinics
· Design/materials protected under the copyright laws;
Advertising;
· Financial benefit to the City;
· Restaurant and the serving of beer and wine; existing facilities have not experienced a
problem with serving beer and wine; not serving beer and wine will impact the overall
profitability;
· Entrance fee of $1.00 will be returned in the form of a token that could be used in the
restaurant;
· If approved, his company would serve as the design/construction consultants and the
City would retain ownership.
Concurring that there is a need for additional field space in the City, Councilman Comerchero noted
that the Council must determine whether or not such a facility would be suitable for the City.
In response to Councilman Comerchero, Mr. Odekirk advised that although it would have an impact
on the profitability, adult and youth usage of the fields could be segregated and, thereby, limiting the
sale of beer and wine only during adult hours.
Mayor Pro Tem Stone noted that, at this point in time, it is the Council's responsibility to determine
whether or not such a facility should be pursued for the City of Temecula.
Acting City Manager Nelson suggested that staff further discuss the pros and cons of a Big League
Dreams Sports Park with Mr. Odekirk. If the City Council were to allocate monies for such a facility,
R:~Agenda\062999CIP
4
Mr. Nelson suggested that staff proceed with a feasibility study, design opportunities, and review of
other potential pay-for-play providers.
For Councilman Roberts, Mr. Odekirk advised that Cathedral City is comprised of approximately 24
acres; Chino of 30 acres; Riverside of 40 acres; noted that a three-field complex could be
constructed on approximately 20 acres and a six-field complex on approximately 26 acres, including
parking. He confirmed that the proposed park could include facilities such as roller rinks,
skateboard parks, ice rinks, and soccer fields.
Councilman Lindemans thanked Mr. Odekirk for his effort and time.
At this time, Mayor Ford opened the public hearing.
The following individuals spoke in support of the construction of a Big League Dreams Sports Park:
· Mr. Greg Waters 31950
· Mr. Steven McKnight 32212
· Mr. Brian Joyce 40255
· Mr. Mike Griffin 45799
· Mr. Scott McKnight 32212
· Mr. John Gleason 30949
· Mr. William Joyce 40255
· Ms. Cheryl Joyce 40255
in support of the project.
· Mr. Thomas Quinn 42935 Corte Cabello
Via Saltio
Via Cordaro
Benwood Court
Corte Carmella
Via Cordaro
Calle Pina Colada
Benwood Court
Benwood Court - submitted to the City Clerk a petition
The above-mentioned individuals spoke in support of a Big League Dreams Sports Park for the
following reasons:
· The need for additional lighted fields
· The overall financial benefit it would have on the entire community
Ms. Althea Coetzee, 45673 Calle Ayora, representing the Friends of the Library, spoke in opposition
to reallocating any funds originally designated for the Library to the Sports Park.
Concurring with the need for sport activities, Ms. Martha Minkler, P.O. Box 954, encouraged the
City to, as well, support cultural activities.
MOTION: Councilman Roberts moved to direct staff to discuss the construction of such a Sports
Park with Mr. Odekirk and that Mr. Odekirk, at this point in time, proceed working with the entire
City Council versus just the Subcommittee. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone
and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
At 8:42 P.M., Mayor Ford called a recess and reconvened the meeting at 8:57 P.M.
R:~,genda\062999CIP
5
COUNCIL/DISTRICT/AGENCY BUSINESS
2 Review of the Proposed FY 2000-04 Capital Imlarovement Program
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Review and discuss the proposed changes to the FY 2000-04 Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) and provide direction to staff as appropriate.
By way of overheads, Acting City Manager Nelson reviewed the staff report in detail, clarifying that
the projects moved to DIF Street only reflect the design cost. After thorough review of the CIP, Mr.
Nelson noted that $5.2 million have been identified which could be reprogrammed from the CIP; an
additional $1 million have been identified from the Fund Balance (projected at 6/30/2000) from the
Operating Budget; and $400,000 could be reallocated from the Insurance Fund leaving a balance of
$900,000, which would be an appropriate amount according to the City's insurance agent. In
conclusion, Acting City Manager Nelson noted that a total of $6,644,000 have been identified and
could be reallocated for Fiscal Year 1999-2000; of this $6.6 million, $2.9 million will be generated
from the DIF Park and Recreation/Quimby and, therefore, those funds must be only allocated for
Park and Recreation purposes; the $3.7 million generated from the Capital Project Reserves and
General Fund may be utilized for any City project. In an effort to benefit the overall residents of the
City, it was recommended that the $6.6 million be reprogrammed to multiple projects versus solely
funding one project.
With regard to the construction of a Big League Dreams Sports Park, Acting City Manager Nelson
advised that staff has estimated the following preliminary costs:
· Design and construction of a 32-acre sports park - $6.0 million
· Completion of off-site and grading improvements - $500,000 to $2.0 million
· Debt owed to RDA Housing for land - $3.7 million - this debt could be repaid over 20
years at the LAIF rate at approximately a $298,000 annual repayment
· Potential revenue generated could be utilized to repay RDA Housing debt
· Overall project could be phased
· Operations, maintenance, and management could be ventured by Big League Dreams
Sports Park or another provider or the City
· Recommend to complete a feasibility study, preliminary design work, and RFP process
for the operation and management of the facility
· Reiterated that all construction costs are only estimates
For Mayor Ford, Acting City Manager Nelson clarified that DIF Park and Recreation/Quimby funds
may not be utilized for the Library.
At Councilman Lindemans' request, City Clerk Jones read into the record a letter from Mr. Tony
Turski, Chairman of the Board of the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce, relaying the
Chamber's desire to view the Cathedral City facility prior to taking a position with regard to the
construction of such a facility.
Ms. Marginia Kelly, 39770 Roripaugh Road, encouraged the City Council to address the City's
overall needs in a proper order and one which focuses on the full spectrum of the community - age,
gender, and various interests.
R:~Agenda\062999CIP
6
Ms. Gera Thole, 41120 Avenida Verde, requested that the City Council consider the children's
minds as well as their physical needs and commented on how the City has outgrown its existing
library.
Ms. Jackie Conrad, 45796 Hopactong Street, encouraged the City Council to address infrastructure
needs throughout the City rather than abandoning those projects for projects that are still in the
planning stages. She requested that the Council place importance on the following four projects:
· Library
· Children's Museum
Sports Facility
· Trails Master Plan
Ms. Toni Perrone, 40676 Geyser Street, Vice President of the Temecula Valley Genealogical
Society, thanked the City Council for its support; commented on how the City has outgrown its
existing Library; and encouraged the City to provide continued support for the construction of a new
Library.
Viewing sports facilities as needed facilities throughout the City, Ms. Robin Vaughn, 42072 Via
Cuesta al Sol, encouraged the City Council to support the Children's Museum for those children
who choose to participate in more cultural versus sport-related activities.
Although supporting both cultural and physical activities for the community, Ms. Terry Blanton,
32060 Merlot Crest, requested that the City Council not reallocate monies which were originally set
aside for the Library.
Ms. Bernadine Anderson, 41615 Corte Higuera, relayed her support of the Library.
Relaying his disappointment with the Council's denial of lights at the James L. Day Middle School,
Mr. Jack Henz, 42835 Villa Terrace, spoke in support of constructing a Big League Dreams Sports
Park and expressed support for the Children's Museum as well the Library.
Viewing the existing Library as too small in size to accommodate the community's need, Mr. Henry
Miller, 29240 Stonewood Road, #47, encouraged the City Council to support the Library as well as
the Children's Museum and a Community Arts Theater.
Mr. Bill Dull, 40436 Chauncey Way, encouraged the City Council to support the Trails Master Plan
and commented on available funding from the County, State, and Federal with regard to such a
Plan.
In light of this evening's discussion, Councilman Comerchero recapitulated the requests to fund the
following five projects: Sports Park, Library, Children's Museum, Performing Arts Theater, and
Trails Master Plan and noted that if funds were properly allocated, the City could fund all these
projects. Prior to finalizing allocation of funds, Mr. Comerchero requested that staff recalculate the
total available funds.
In response to Councilman Comerchero's request to recalculate the total available funds, Acting
City Manager Nelson confirmed that the City Council has $8 million available to reallocate.
Providing information with regard to Senate Bill 3 (Library Construction Bond), Councilman Roberts
advised that this Bill requires a matching 35% from the City of the needed $10.5 million; noted that
R:~Agenda\062999CIP
7
$1.6 million have already been allocated to the Library; and requested that an additional $2.0 million
be allocated to the Library in order to meet the 35% matching funds.
Mayor Pro Tem Stone relayed his desire to place equal priority to the Library as well as the sports
facilities and concurred with the support of the Trails Master Plan, the Children's Museum, and
allocating $2.0 million for the Library to ensure the 35% matching funds. Mr. Stone recommended
the completion of a feasibility study for the sports park and possibly phasing the overall project.
City Council concurrence was noted with regard to Mayor Ford's recommendation to allocate
$550,000 in order to purchase the necessary right-of-way acquisition for Date and Cherry Street.
Mayor Ford as well recommended the allocation of funds for the 79S Ultimate Interchange. Mayor
Ford also commented on the need to prioritize the Pala Road project to which Acting City Manager
Nelson noted that grants could be obtained for this project and that discussion will be pursued with
Pechanga, the developer, and Wolf Creek in order to expedite this project. Mr. Ford relayed his
concurrence with allocating $70,000 toward the Trails Master Plan.
With the exception of the Library, Councilman Comerchero noted that all projects should require a
full feasibility study.
At this time, Mayor Pro Tem Stone abstained from discussions and left the dais.
In response to Councilman Lindemans, discussion ensued with regard to an outside donation for
the construction of a theater behind the Mercantile building which could function as the lobby.
Mayor Ford recommended that staff pursue the possible donation and readdress this matter with
the City Council at a future meeting.
At this time, Mayor Pro Tem Stone returned to the dais.
MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to allocate the available $8 million in the following
manner;
· $2.0 million for the Library
· $550,000 for the Date and Cherry Street land acquisition
· $70,000 Trails Master Plan
· $400,000 reallocated from the James L. Day Middle School lighting project to the
Rancho Sports Park field lighting project
· $1.2 million Children's Museum
· $600,000 for a Performing Arts Center
· balance approximately $3.5 million for a sports park
Mayor Pro Tem Stone seconded the motion. (This motion was ultimately amended; see below.)
Following some additional discussion regarding the allocation of funds, the above-made motion was
amended as follows:
MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to allocate the available $8 million in the following
roEInner;
· $2.0 million for the Library
· $550,000 for the Date and Cherry Street land acquisition
· $70,000 Trails Master Plan
R:~Agenda\062999CIP
8
· $400,000 reallocated from the James L. Day Middle School lighting project to the
Rancho Sports Park field lighting project
· $1.0 million Children's Museum
· $600,000 for a Performing Arts Center
· balance approximately $3.7 million for a sports park
Mayor Pro Tem Stone seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of
Mayor Pro Tem Stone who abstained with regard to the Performing Arts Center and Councilman
Lindemans who voted no.
ADJOURNMENT
At 10:29 P.M., Mayor Ford formally adjourned the City Council meeting to Tuesday, July 13,
1999, 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula California.
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:~,genda\062999CIP
9
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
JULY 13, 1999
CLOSED SESSION
A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 6:30 P.M. It was duly
moved and seconded to adjourn to closed session pursuant to Government code Sections:
Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.8 concerning the acquisition of real property at the east side of
Pujol Street, south of Sixth Street (APN 922-053-008), 28516 Pujol Street
(APN 922-053-007), 28725 Pujol Street (APN 922-062019), and 28731 Pujol
Street (APN 922-062-016). The negotiation parties are the City of
Temecula/Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and
Redevelopment Agency and Otto Family Trust, Irwin, Ladanyi, and Rutner.
Under negotiation are the prices and terms of payment of the real property
interests proposed to be acquired. The City/Agency negotiators are Shawn
Nelson, Jim O'Grady, and John Meyer.
o
Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.9(a) with respect to two matters of existing litigation
involving the City and/or the Agency. The following cases/claims will be
discussed: 1) Firestone vs. City of Temecula and 2) Claim of Westside City II
(Bill Dendy).
Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.9(b) with respect to one matter of potential litigation.
With respect to each matter, the City Attorney has determined that a point
has been reached where there is a significant exposure to litigation involving
the City and/or the Agency based on existing facts and circumstances.
The Open Session of the City Council meeting convened at 7:00 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Councilmembers: Comerchero, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, and Ford.
Absent: Councilmember: None.
PRELUDE MUSIC
The prelude music was provided by Matthew Cappiello.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor Gary Nelson of Calvary Chapel of Temecula.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Mayor Pro Tem Stone.
R:~vlinutes\071399 I
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Temecula Good Nei.clhbor Award
Councilman Roberrs presented the Good Neighbor Award to Ms. Gera Thole who
accepted it with appreciation.
Western Ea.qle Foundation Proclamation
Mayor Ford proclaimed September 12, 1999 to be designated as Western Eagle
Foundation Day.
Ms. Kathleen Krugar accepted the award, thanking the City for the honor.
Help Hospitalized Veterans Proclamation
In honor of the Center's Grand Opening, Mayor Ford proclaimed the day of July 24,
1999 to be designated Help Hospitalized Veteran's Day.
Accepting with gratitude the award, Mr. Mike Lynch extended an invitation to the
community to the Grand Opening Ceremony of the new facility on July 24, 1999.
Balloon and Wine Festival Presentation
On behalf of the Balloon and Wine Festival's Board, Mr. Bob Brown presented the City of
Temecula with a framed poster commemorating the event, thanking the City of Temecula for
its support.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Ms. Janet Dixon, 31860 Via Cordoba, relayed her concern with respect to the speed of
traffic on Via Cordoba; noted that the street was utilized as a short cut; relayed that at
the June 24, 1999 Public/Traffic Safety meeting, the Commission denied the matter of
installing stop signs on Via Cordoba; and requested that the City Council agendize the
issue in order to hear the concerns of the community.
In response to Ms. Dixon's comments, Mayor Pro Tem Stone requested that the City
Council be forwarded the minutes of the aforementioned Public/Traffic Safety
Commission meeting in order to review the issue in detail.
Mr. Charles Hankley, 31745 Via Cordoba, reiterated the concern regarding traffic on Via
Cordoba; noted the sloping of the street causing cars to accelerate; and reiterated the
request for the aforementioned issue to be agendized by the City Council.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Relaying his enjoyment of the City's 4th of July celebration activities, Councilman
Comerchero recommended availability of 3-D glasses at next year's festivities for the
community's pleasure, noting the enhanced affect of viewing the fireworks with
the 3-D glasses.
R:~vlinutes\071399 2
Co
Due to the community concern with respect to traffic on Via Cordoba, Mayor Pro
Tem Stone recommended that there be additional Police Enforcement in the area in
an effort to maintain safety with respect to speed until the issue could be further
addressed by the City Council.
With respect to the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA),
Councilman Roberts updated the Council, relaying that staff recommendation at the
last SCRRA meeting was that the high speed rail project not be constructed in the
Inland Riverside and San Diego Counties, recommending instead that the rail be
constructed in the coastal region; noted the parallel route of the existing commuter
route and Amtrak; relayed that at the July 20, 1999 SCRRA meeting the
aforementioned issue will be considered in order to address installation of the high
speed rail in the Inland Riverside and San Diego areas.
For Mayor Pro Tem Stone, Councilman Roberts confirmed that the San Diego Rail
Authority, the City of Carlsbad, and the associated coastal cities are supportive of the
construction of the high speed rail in the Inland Riverside and San Diego Counties;
and in response to Mr. Stone's querying, relayed that due to the request for letter
correspondence from the perspective cities requesting the high speed rail to come
through Riverside County, up the I-15 freeway, noted the importance of conveyance
of the letter from the City of Temecula.
For informational purposes, Mayor Ford relayed that there would be a Planning
Agreement brought forward to the City Council from the Western Regional Council of
Governments in order to address RCHCA's obligations in the Multi-Species Plan,
enabling the County and the Cities to work in cooperative agreement; and noted that
the issue would be further discussed at the time the issue is presented to the
Council.
1 Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOM MEN DATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included
in the agenda.
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of June 8, 1999;
1.2 Approve the minutes of June 10, 1999.
R:~'Vlinutes\071399 3
3
Resolution Approving List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-63
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
City Treasurer's Report as of May 31, 1999
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of May 31, 1999.
5 City Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt the Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy as proposed by staff,
which provides safety, liquidity, and yield for City funds.
6 1998-99 Community Service Fundin.q Program Special Distribution
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Review and approve the 1998-99 Community Service Funding Program
application request from the Education Foundation in the amount of $12,000
to fund the Chaparral High School stadium lighting.
Consent Calendar Item No, 6 was pulled for separate discussion; see pagel0,
R:\Minutes\071399 4
7 Community Facilities District No. 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) Initiation of Actions
Necessary to Foreclose Delinquent Special Tax Liens
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ORDERING ACTION TO TRANSMIT TO
THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DOCUMENTS
NECESSARY TO CREDIT THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
TAX COLLECTOR UPON THE TAX ROLL AND TO
RELIEVE THE TAX COLLECTION OF FURTHER DUTY
THERETO IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.
88-12 AS REQUIRED BY LAW, ORDERING ACTIONS
TO FORECLOSE THE DELINQUENT SPECIAL TAX
LIENS, AND ORDERING THE RECORDATION OF A
NOTICE OF INTENT TO REMOVE DELINQUENT
SPECIAL TAX INSTALLMENTS FROM THE TAX ROLL
8 Cooperation Agreement for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds for
Fiscal Years 2000-01, 2001-02, and 2002-03
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Authorize the City Manager to execute the Cooperation Agreement for
Community Development Block Grant funds for Fiscal Years 2000-01, 2001-02,
2002-03.
9 Maintenance Facility Furniture
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Approve an expenditure to Pacific Business Interiors (PBI) in the amount of
$67,433.65 to purchase furniture that will be installed in the Maintenance Facility
office additions and modifications.
10 Street Name - Nada Lane
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-65
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA CHANGING A PORTION OF NORTH
GENERAL KEARNY TO THE STREET NAME NADA LN
R:~'Vlinutes\071399 5
Consent Calendar Item No. 10 was pulled for separate discussion; see page 10.
11 Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-66
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE FAIR
COMPETITION AND TAXPAYER SAVINGS ACT
INITIATIVE AND LEGISLATION
12 Tract Map No. 28850 (located south of Mar.qarita Road between Avenida Sonoma
and 160 feet west of Avenida Cima Del Sol)
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1
Approve Tract Map No. 28850 in conformance with the Conditions of
Approval;
12.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement;
12.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful
Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond, and Monument Bond as
security for the agreements.
13 Authorize Temporan/Partial Street Closures for Bike Races on July 25 and July 31,
1999 ('Business Park Drive and Single Oak Drive)
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-67
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING PARTIAL
STREET CLOSURES OF BUSINESS PARK DRIVE AND
SINGLE OAK DRIVE FOR THE TEMECULA CYCLING
CLASSIC STAGE RACE ON JULY 25, 1999, AND THE
RIVERSIDE CYCLING CLUB RACE ON JULY 31, 1999,
AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE
PERMITS FOR THESE SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENTS
In response to Councilman Roberts querying, Acting Director of Public Works Hughes
relayed that the final permit will assure that community members have access to the
associated churches.
R:\Minutes\071399 6
14 Substitute A.qreements and Securities in Tract No. 24185-2 (located northwesterly of
the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road at De Portola Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1
Accept the substitute Subdivision Improvement and Subdivision
Monument Agreements, and Faithful Performance, Labor and Materials,
and Subdivision Monumentation Securities in Tract No. 24185-2;
14.2
Authorize release of the Faithful Performance, Labor and Materials, and
Subdivision Monumentation Securities on file;
14.3
Direct the City Clerk to so notify the developer and sureties.
15 Acceptance of Grant of Easement for Traffic Si.qnal Equipment
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-68
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT
FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AND
MAINTENANCE PURPOSES, FACILITATING
INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO
THE PROMENADE MALL PROJECT
16 Acceptance of Grant of Easement for Traffic Si.qnal Equipment
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-69
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT
FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AND
MAINTENANCE PURPOSES, FACILITATING
INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO
THE PROMENADE MALL PROJECT
R:~vlinutes\071399 7
17 Acceptance of Grant of Easement for Traffic Si,qnal E.quipment
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-70
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT
FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AND
MAINTENANCE PURPOSES, FACILITATING
INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO
THE PROMENADE MALL PROJECT
18 Overland Drive Overcrossin.q Improvements - Proiect No. PW95-11 - Amendment to
Cooperative Agreement No. 8-931 ('Resolution No. 96-113)
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-71
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN FIRST
AMENDMENT TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 8-
931 BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE OVERLAND DRIVE
OVERCROSSING IMPROVEMENTS
19 Pechan.qa Band of Mission Indians Pre-Excavation A.qreement- Pala Road Brid.qe
Improvement- Proiect No. PW97-15
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1
Approve the agreement with the Temecula Band of Luiseno Mission Indians
of the Pechanga Indian Reservation (Pechanga Band) for the cost to monitor
grading operations in conjunction with the construction of the Pala Road
Bridge - Project No. PW97-15 - and authorize the Mayor to execute the
agreement.
Consent Calendar No. 19 was pulled for separate discussion; see page 11.
R:\Minutes\071399 8
20 Amendment to Joint Fundin.q A.qreement with Riverside County Transportation
Department for Weekend Traffic Control at I-15 and Highway 79 South
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1
Approve an amendment to an existing agreement between the City of
Temecula and Riverside County extending California Highway Patrol (CHP)
traffic control services for weekend traffic control at I-15 and Highway 79
South in an amount not to exceed $10,500.00 and authorize the Mayor to
sign the amendment.
21 Solicitation of Construction Bids for Traffic Si.qnal and Median Modification at Rancho
California Road and Town Center Drive - Project No. PW99-09
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1
Approve the Project Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department
of Public Works to solicit bids for the modification of the traffic signal and
median islands at the intersection of Rancho California Road and Town
Center Drive - Project No. PW99-09.
22 Award of Construction Contract for the Street Name Si.cln Replacement - Project No.
PW98-18
RECOMMENDATION:
22.1
Award construction contract for the Street Name Sign Replacement - Project
No. PW98-18 - J. K. Weigle Engineering Contract in the amount of
$40,611.16 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract;
22.2
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $4,061.11 which is equal to 10% of the contract
amount.
23 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 99-12
RECOMMENDATION:
23.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-12
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC
PLAN TO MODIFY THE PARKING STANDARDS IN THE
CORE OF OLD TOWN TEMECULA (PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA99-0160)
Mayor Pro Tem Stone abstained with regard to this item.
R:~vlinutes\071399 9
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-5,
7-9, 11-18, and 20-23. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone and voice
vote reflected approval with the exception of Mayor Pro Tem Stone who abstained with
regard to Item No. 23.
Items considered under separate discussion
6 1998-99 Community Service Fundin.q Pro.qram Special Distribution
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Review and approve the 1998-99 Community Service Funding Program
application request from the Education Foundation in the amount of $12,000 to
fund the Chaparral High School stadium lighting.
Due to the recent statement revealing the current status of the amount of funds currently
raised for this particular project at $87,598.28 (per supplemental agenda material),
Councilman Comerchero recommended that the City Council amend the amount of
funding for the Chaparral High School stadium lighting to the amount of $12,401.72 in
order to aid in the goal to raise $100,000.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Stone moved to approve staff recommendation, amending
the amount of funding to be $12,401.72. Councilman Lindemans seconded the motion
and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
1 O- Street Name - Nada Lane
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-65
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA CHANGING A PORTION OF NORTH
GENERAL KEARNY TO THE STREET NAME NADA LN
Relaying that this issue was brought forward to the City Council via a request from the
Meadowview Homeowners Association, Chief Building Official Elmo presented the staff
report (of record); specified the location of the disjointed road section proposed to be
renamed to Nada Lane; for Councilman Comerchero, advised that due to the property
lines' proximity to the right-of-way, there would not be future housing on this particular
street; and for Councilman Roberts, noted that the suggested street names were relayed
from the Association.
Mr. Andrew Ronie, 40575 La Colina, relayed the desire of the community to change the
name of the street; and for Councilman Lindemans, confirmed that nada means nothing,
noting that the street connects to nothing.
R: \Minutes\071399 10
Mr. Bob Johnston, 29760 Valle Verde, reiterated the desire of the community to change
the name of the street.
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to approve staff recommendation to change
the street name to Nada Lane. Mayor Pro Tem Stone seconded the motion.
Councilman Roberrs indicated that the wording of the associated Resolution should be
corrected to reflect Nada Lane in lieu of Nada Ln.
Voice vote was taken reflecting unanimous approval.
19 Pechan.qa Band of Mission Indians Pre-Excavation A.qreement- Pala Road Brid.qe
Improvement- Proiect No. PW97-15
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1
Approve the agreement with the Temecula Band of Luiseno Mission Indians
of the Pechanga Indian Reservation (Pechanga Band) for the cost to monitor
grading operations in conjunction with the construction of the Pala Road
Bridge - Project No. PW97-15 - and authorize the Mayor to execute the
agreement.
Acting Director of Public Works Hughes provided a brief overview of the staff report (via
agenda material.)
Ms. Laura Miranda, attorney representing the Pechanga Band, relayed further
information regarding the submittal, specifying the rationale for the proposed agreement;
recommended that with respect to the signature page, that the second signature line on
the proposal be deleted; and with respect to Addendum 1, denoted on page 4 of the
Agreement (of record) relayed that the indicated pre-grading conference referenced in
paragraph 1 would not be necessary, recommending that it be stricken; with respect to
page 4, paragraph 3, recommended modifying the language, as follows: the phrase:
designated in the attached map, labeled Exhibit A be revised to correctly reflect:
designated in the attached work schedule, labeled Appendix A; and with respect to page
4, the last paragraph, relayed that the term Monitors should be replaced with the term
Lead Monitors, and that the term Monitor Trainees be replaced with the term Monitors.
Mr. Ben Masiel, representing the Pechanga Cultural Resources Committee, was
available for questions from the Council.
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to approve the Agreement, as modified.
Mayor Pro Tem Stone seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
At 7:40 P. M., the City Council convened as the Temecula Community Services District
and the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. At 7:45 P.M., the City Council resumed with
regularly scheduled City Council business.
R:~vlinutes\071399 l ]
PUBLIC HEARING
24
An Appeal of the Planning Commission's Decision to Recommend Approval to the
City Council for PA98-0511, a Zonin.q Amendment to create a Planned
Development Overlay, and the Plannin.q Commission's approval of PA98-0512, a
proposal to develop a 244-unit senior apartment complex with two- and three-story
buildin.qs on an 8.13 acre lot
RECOMMENDATION:
24.1 Continue to the July 27, 1999, City Council meeting.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Stone moved to open the public hearing; and to continue the
matter to the City Council meeting of July 27, 1999. Councilman Lindemans seconded
the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
25 Plannin.cl Application No. PA97-0446 (Zoning Amendment, Map Change)
RECOMMENDATION:
25.1 Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA97-
0446;
25.2 Adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA97-
0446;
25.3 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-18
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA97-0446 (ZONING AMENDMENT, MAP CHANGE)
AMENDING THE CITY'S ZONING MAP, CHANGING THE
ZONING OF 1.07 NET ACRES FROM LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL L1 (1 ACRE TO 2.5 ACRE NET LOT
SIZE) TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL L2 (1/2 ACRE
TO 1 ACRE NET LOT SIZE), ON PROPERTY LOCATED
AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ESTERO STREET
AND ORMSBY ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NO. 945-070-011
Mayor Pro Tem Stone advised that he would be abstaining with regard to this Agenda
Item, and therefore left the dais.
By way of overhead maps, Deputy City Manager Thornhill provided an overview of the
staff report (via agenda material); relayed that guidelines had been developed for this
particular area for permitted subdivision in the base zoning; relayed the Planning
Commission's approval of the lot split subdivision at the May 19, 1999 Planning
R:'~vlinutes\071399 12
Commission meeting, conditioned by City Council approval of the rezoning; specified the
community concern with respect to the proposal (of record); for Councilman Roberts,
provided additional information regarding the septic systems approved by the
Environmental Health Department; and relayed that if it were the desire of the Council,
staff would investigate hook-up connections to the existing sewer system for future
projects in this particular area, relaying the restrictions related to the issue.
While acknowledging that this particular project has met the specified criteria,
Councilman Comerchero queried the potential for the adjacent properties to be
subdivided at a future point in time.
For Councilman Comerchero, Deputy City Manager Thornhill relayed that currently there
are no proposals to subdivide property in the area of discussion, providing additional
information with respect to the property parcels in the area.
At this time, Mayor Ford opened the public hearing.
Mr. Larry Markham, representing the applicant, for Councilman Roberts, provided
additional information regarding the location and status of the sewer line; and for
Councilman Comerchero, provided additional information regarding the adjacent
properties, and the potential for density modifications.
For the record, City Attorney Thorson relayed Mayor Pro Tem Stone's right to speak with
respect to the affect of this proposal to his own personal property or business,
referencing the criteria developed within the Political Reform Act.
Mr. Jeffrey E. Stone, 30952 Corte De Los Santos, relayed the original intent of the
Specific Plan to maintain larger parcels in this particular area; noted that property values
would be jeopardized by the proposed subdivided lot sizes; and relayed concern with
respect to setting a precedent for future application for subdivisions in the area.
In response to Mr. Stone's comments, Mr. Markham clarified the zoning in the area, and
the consistency thereof within this particular proposal; relayed the quality of the
proposed project; and noted that it was his opinion that the property values would not be
negatively affected with respect to this particular project.
Mayor Ford closed the public hearing.
For Councilman Comerchero, City Attorney Thorson clarified the purview of the Council,
noting that approval or denial of this particular project was within the discretion of the
Council.
For Councilman Roberts, Mr. Ron Guerriero, Chairman of the Planning Commission,
confirmed that the Planning Commission approved the matter of discussion by a vote of
4 approvals, noting 1 abstention.
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to approve staff recommendation. Mayor Ford
seconded the motion.
Mayor Ford provided additional information regarding the area and the associated
topography.
R:\Minutes\071399 13
Relaying that he had visited the site, Councilman Comerchero advised that this
particular project would not have a negative affect regarding property values with respect
to the adjacent properties.
For the record City Attorney Thorson introduced and read by title only Ordinance No. 99-
18.
At this time voice vote was taken reflecting approval with the exception of Mayor Pro
Tem Stone who abstained.
At 8:14 P.M. a short recess was taken, and the meeting reconvened at 8:22 P.M.
26 Plannin.q Application No. PA99-0104 (Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan No. 263)
RECOMMENDATION:
26.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-19
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA99-0104, AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
THE SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 263 (THE TEMECULA
REGIONAL CENTER), AMENDING SECTION IV.E.4., TO
ALLOW A 21 FOOT HIGH ENTERTAINMENT
MARQUEE, ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND
YNEZ ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NOS. 910-130-052 -053 AND -054.
Via overheads, Deputy City Manager Thornhill presented the staff report, noting the
applicant's rationale for the request, specifically due to the location of the cinema at the
rear of the mall site; relayed the Planning Commission's denial of the request due to the
following: the reluctance to amend the Specific Plan, the potential for traffic hazard, and
primarily due to the height of the proposed marquis; for Mayor Pro Tem Stone, noted the
City's general intent to reduce the height of signage; specified that the developer
requirements (specifically the base and mall logo) would encompass approximately 9.5
feet of the signage; and for Councilman Roberts, specified the location of the proposed
marquis signage and the associated landscaping.
For Mayor Pro Tem Stone, Mr. Ron Guerriero, Chairman of the Planning Commission,
relayed that the Commission was aware of the specified developer requirements of the
signage, specifically with respect to the base and the mall logo when the decision to
deny the proposal was made.
Concurring with Mayor Pro Tem Stone's comments regarding the applicant's mandated
developer requirements, Councilman Comerchero noted that previous discussions
revealed that the applicant would be willing to reduce the showcase to display five or six
R:~linutes\071399 14
movie entities; and queried whether Forest City would be willing to modify the developer
mandated requirements.
Due to the vast investment of the mall and the positive impact upon the community,
Councilman Lindemans relayed concurrence with the desire of the developer to display
the mall logo, and the desire of the applicant to display the marquis, as proposed; and
relayed his support of the proposed marquis, as presented.
Initially, Councilman Roberts relayed his concern with respect to the sign potentially
creating a safety hazard.
Mr. Michael Grey, representing the applicant, further specified the constraints of
developing signage consistent with the permitted height specifications within Specific
Plan in light of the mandated developer requirements to maintain the base design and
the ma~l logo.
Mr. Steve Schafenacker, representing the developer of the mall site, specified the
original approved signage plan to install five major signs at the mall site; noted that with
this particular proposed sign, the site would maintain less total square footage of
signage than the Specific Plan allows; relayed the additional design enhancement of the
signage; presented the design of the alternate entry signage, similar in design and
inclusive of the mall logo; and recommended approval of this particular signage, as
proposed.
In response to Councilman Comerchero's querying, Mr. Schafenacker relayed the he
would be agreeable to reducing the developer specified requirements by two feet (i.e.,
the base and mall logo.)
For Councilman Comerchero, Mr. Grey relayed that the applicant would be agreeable to
reduce the showcase to display solely five movie titles.
MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to approve the signage as modified. Mayor
Pro Tem Stone seconded the motion. (This motion was withdrawn.)
Ms. Patricia Hall, 27483 Lark Court, relayed her attendance at the May 19, 1999
Planning Commission meeting; advised that movie title information could be obtained via
the newspaper or the telephone; noted the three alternate Edwards Cinema signage at
the mall site; and requested that the Council deny the proposed signage.
For Mayor Pro Tem Stone, Mr. Schafenacker provided clarification as to the rationale of
the location of this particular signage; and relayed that he was of the opinion that the
particular sign would not be a traffic hazard.
For Mayor Pro Tem Stone, Acting Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that the sign
would not be an obstruction with respect to traffic at this particular site location.
Councilman Lindemans reiterated his complete support of the proposed project.
For Mayor Ford, Mr. Schafenacker specified the location of the signage on the site,
noting the reduction in overall signage with respect to the number and size originally
proposed.
R:~Vlinutes\071399 15
For Mayor Ford, Councilman Comerchero noted the specifications of the previously
discussed revision to the signage, as follows: to approve a marquis sign with a total
height of fifteen feet, specifying the reduction of the size of the mall logo and the base
design of the marquis.
Due to additional Council discussion and clarification with respect to liability issues,
Councilman Roberts expressed his support of the marquis signage, as revised.
MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to amend the Specific Plan, approving a
fifteen-foot (15') marquis sign. Mayor Pro Tem Stone seconded the motion. (This
motion was ultimately amended.)
City Attorney Thorson provided clarification with respect to the associated Resolution
and Ordinance.
Mr. Grey relayed confusion with respect to the dimensions of the proposed revised
signage; relayed that the proposed revision would not have provision for the
representation of the Edwards Cinema logo; and it was noted that the six-inch space
between theater titles on the signage was not calculated into the overall dimensions.
Additional Council discussion ensued.
MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to approve the marquis sign at a height of
twenty-one (21) feet. Mayor Pro Tem Stone seconded the motion.
The owner's representative relayed agreement to the proposed revised signage
displaying five movie titles.
Mayor Ford closed the public hearing.
City Attorney Thorson introduced and read the revised Ordinance into the record,
specifying the modified text of the penultimate sentence to read, as follows:
freestanding theater marquis signs cannot exceed a maximum of twenty-one (21) feet in
height; and recommended deletion of Sections 2 and 3 of the Ordinance.
At this time, voice vote was taken reflecting unanimous approval.
27 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 99-14
RECOMMENDATION:
27.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-14
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER
15.16 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY
ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE CALIFORNIA FIRE
CODE VOLUME 1, CCR TITLE 24 PART 9, 1998
EDITION, AND THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE
STANDARDS VOLUME 2, 1997 EDITION
R:~Minutes\071399 16
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to adopt staff recommendation, regarding
Ordinance No. 99-14. The motion was seconded by Councilman Roberts and voice vote
reflected unanimous approval.
28 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 99-16
RECOMMENDATION:
28.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-16
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER
15.04 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO
ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING CODES
WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS THERETO: THE 1998
EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE; THE
1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL
CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA
PLUMBING CODE; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE
UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; THE 1997 EDITION
OF THE UNIFORM CODE FOR ABATEMENT OF
DANGEROUS BUILDINGS; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE
UNIFORM HOUSING CODE; AND THE 1998 EDITION
OF THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to adopt staff recommendation, regarding
Ordinance No. 99-16. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone and voice
vote reflected unanimous approval.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
29
Adoption of the FY 2000-04 Capital Improvement Program
RECOMMENDATION:
29.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-72
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FY 2000-04 AND
ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET
FOR FY 1999-00
By way of overheads, Acting City Manager Nelson presented the City's CIP plan,
highlighting the goal, the funding, the process of development, and the number one
R:~vlinutes\071399 ! 7
priority to address traffic circulation; specified the revenue sources of the program; noted
that funding sources have been identified for the first two years of the five-year Plan,
relaying that seventy-one percent (71%) of the funded projects are dedicated to traffic
improvements; reviewed, in detail, the major projects proposed within the CIP; and
commended the Department heads, and specifically, Director of Finance Roberts, and
Senior Management Analyst Papagolos for their excellent efforts with respect to this
document.
For Mayor Pro Tem Stone, Acting City Manager Nelson confirmed that the CIP Plan
could be reprioritized at a future point in time as additional information is obtained via the
studies associated with the projects; and relayed that due to the Council's request, the
CIP could be reviewed in six months.
Recommending that the CIP be reviewed prior to the six-month period, Councilman
Lindemans relayed concern with respect to the status of the City's Reserve fund,
referencing his letter printed in The Californian, denoting his comments; noted the City's
purchase of a 32-acre parcel of land in 1992 for approximately $3,500,000, and the
subsequent City Council action to sell the aforementioned land to the Redevelopment
Agency (RDA) (for the development of low-cost housing) in 1994, recuperating the
monies in the General Fund; specified the reduction in the property value of the parcel;
relayed that there is a short-term opportunity for the City to utilize the supply of 500,000
cubic yards of dirt at a cost of $860,000 in lieu of the imported price of $2,000,000;
recommended that the Council address at this time the lowered property value and the
potential for loss if the land were sold; for the record, discharged his responsibility if the
Council opts to not address this particular issue at this point in time, having submitted his
article for the record denoting his comments; and requested that the Councilmembers
read the aforementioned article.
Commending Councilman Lindemans on his research, Mayor Pro Tem Stone relayed his
opposition to Mr. Lindemans' comments; specified the alternate City projects providing
beneficial assets to the City; noted that there has been no real loss with respect to the
property value of the parcel since the property has not been sold, relaying the potential
for the City to keep the property until the value rises; and noted his opinion that the past
referenced City Council actions provided essential improvements and assets to the
community via the necessary funding elements.
With respect to the Pala Road Improvements Project (Phase II), Councilman Roberts
relayed his previous recommendation to revise the priority category to a Priority I due to
the Pala Bridge Project and the associated impact; and as a result of recent discussions,
presented the request by the Pechanga Band to have the City Council approve the Pala
Road Improvements be constructed on a fast-track schedule, noting that with the
aforementioned proposal the Pechanga Band would fund $2,000,000 for the project,
which is fifty-percent (50%) of the total cost of the project.
Regarding Councilman Robert's presentation of the Pechanga proposal, Acting Director
of Public Works Hughes queried the specific time frame intended by the fast-track
schedule; and queried the source of the proposed funding.
In response to Acting Director of Public Works Hughes, Councilman Roberts relayed that
he would obtain further specification regarding the source of funding.
R:~linutes\071399
Mayor Pro Tem Stone recommended pursuing the aforementioned proposal, noting the
need to investigate the total cost of the project inclusive of administrative and design
costs.
Mayor Ford relayed for the record that he would be abstaining with respect to the Pala
Road issue.
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to approve the Capital Improvement Program.
Councilman Roberrs seconded the motion.
Mayor Ford provided additional clarification with respect to Councilman Lindemans'
previously mentioned comments regarding the parcel of land purchased by the City; and
recommended that the City pursue grading the property at this time due to the reduced
cost presented by Councilman Lindemans.
City Attorney Thorson relayed that Resolution No. 99-72 should reflect Mayor Ford's
abstention with respect to the Pala Road Project (Phase II).
At this time voice vote was taken reflecting unanimous approval with the exception of
Mayor Ford who abstained with respect to the Pala Road Project.
30 Sta.q.qered Work Hours
RECOMMENDATION:
30.1 Receive and file.
Commending the Traffic Subcommittee's efforts with respect to their assistance in the
preparation of the Staggered Work Study, Acting Director of Public Works Hughes
introduced Ms. Maryann Edwards (Commissioner on the Public/Traffic Safety
Commission), who would present the results of the study.
Relaying the previous request of the City Council for the completion of the study, by way
of colored graphics, Ms. Edwards presented the data collected regarding the Staggered
Work Hours Study, encompassing the measurement of the top 31 companies' shift
schedules (per agenda material); relayed that the analysis revealed that the peak traffic
is most likely impacted primarily be commuters (community members leaving the City in
the AM peak hours and returning during the PM peak period); noted that seventy-seven
percent (77%) of the major area employers are presently implementing staggered shift
hours; relayed that at the 3:00 P.M. peak traffic period, solely 1,112 motorists are
impacting the City's major intersections from companies within the area; and due to the
results of the study recommended that there is no need to implement staggered work
hour shifts with respect to companies in the Temecula area.
Commending the companies in the area, Councilman Roberts relayed the remarkable
improvement over the last seven years associated with staggered work hours currently
being implemented; and commended the Subcommittee for its efforts associated with
the thorough study.
R:~vlinutes\071399 19
Acting Director of Public Works Hughes provided additional clarification regarding the
data; relayed that the information was collected from businesses maintaining 50 or more
employees; and advised that at a future point in time, as development increases, the
City Council may want to revisit this issue.
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to receive and file the report. Councilman
Roberts seconded the motion.
Mayor Pro Tem Stone applauded the Public/Traffic Safety Commission regarding its
efforts associated with the Study, and the companies in the area with respect to the
results of the data revealing the implementation of staggered work hours.
At this time voice vote was taken reflecting unanimous approval.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
Thanking the City Council for its support of the CIP, Acting City Manager Nelson
relayed the vast benefits to the community associated with the Program.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
City Attorney Thorson advised that there were no reportable actions with respect to
the Closed Session under the Brown Act.
Referencing the City Council motion at the June 22, 1999 meeting, adopting the
official moratorium on the wireless telecommunication facilities, City Attorney
Thorson relayed that at the July 27, 1999 City Council meeting there will be a
hearing and an extension for the aforementioned moratorium Ordinance.
ADJOURNMENT
At 9:55 P.M., Mayor Ford formally adjourned the City Council meeting to Tuesday, July
27, 1999, 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:\Minutes\071399 20
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
JULY 27, 1999
CLOSED SESSION
A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 6:30 P.M. It was duly
moved and seconded to adjourn to Closed Session pursuant to Government Code Sections:
54956.8 concerning the acquisition of real property at 28496 Pujol Street (APN 922-053-
005). The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula/Redevelopment Agency
Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section of the
City of Temecula and Viefhaus and Barker. Under negotiation are the price and terms of
payment of the real property interests proposed to be acquired. The City/Agency
negotiators are Shawn Nelson, Jim O'Grady, and John Meyer.
Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Cod3
54956.9(a) with respect to one matter of existing litigation involving the City and/or the
Agency. The following case/claim will be discussed: (a) Blind Pig Brewery.
Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
concerning the acquisition of real property located at 28410 Front Street (APN 922-023-
019 and APN 921-070-006). The negotiating parties are the City of
Temecula/Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and Richard G. Gabriel and
Marilyn F. Gabriel; Trustees of the Gabriel Family Trust; James N. Senechal; Trustee of
the James N. Senechal Declaration of Trust; David L. Phares and Susie G. Phares;
Thomas H. Maxwell and Janice M. Maxwell; and Wayne F. Whitehurst.
4. Discussion of candidates for position of City Manager to Government Code Section
54957.
The Open Session of the City Council meeting convened at 7:00 P.M.
Present:
Councilmembers:
Comerchero, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone,
and Ford.
Absent: Councilmember: None.
PRELUDE MUSIC
The prelude music was provided by Katie Welsh·
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor John Chambers of Grace Presbyterian.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Councilman Comerchero.
R:~,genda\072799
Prelude Music: Katie Welsh
Invocation:
Pastor John Chambers of Grace Presbyterian
Flag Salute:
Councilman Comerchero
ROLL CALL:
Comerchero, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Ford
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
International Year of Older Persons in Temecula Proclamation
Mayor Ford proclaimed 1999 as the International Year of Older Persons in Temecula and the
proclamation was accepted by Ms. Linda Cole.
Juvenile Offender Law Enforcement Team (JOLT) Presentation
Briefly highlighting the item, Police Sergeant AIm introduced Deputy Potter and Officer Gardella
who further elaborated on the successful results of this program, referencing the following:
· Temecula Valley Unified School District Canine Suppression Program
· Truancy Abatement Program
· Temecula Valley Youth Court
· High Impact Rehabilitation Tour- H.I.R.T.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mr. Kirk McKenney, P.O. Box 390816, apprised the City Council of a problem he has encountered
with a contractor owing him money and advised the Council that this contractor has done work for
the City. After further investigation, Mr. McKenney noted that it was determined that Mayor Ford is
a member of this company and, therefore, requested the Mayor's assistance and questioned why
the City would have a contractor, who does not pay his subcontractors, work for the City.
Responding to Mr. McKenney's comments, Mayor Ford advised that he has never been nor is he
currently an ownedmember of this company. Mr. Ford noted that City Attorney Thorson has been
requested to further research the matter and stated that the City Attorney is in receipt of a letter
from the company's attorney, noting that he has never nor currently is an owner/member of this
company.
Advising that he is the owner of the company that Mr. McKenney is referencing, Mr. Alan Shaw,
30655 DePortola, confirmed that Mayor Ford has never nor currently is an ownedmember of this
company, advising that Mr. Ford's name was inadvertently placed on some legal papers and that
the necessary correction to remove his name has been made.
Councilman Lindemans requested that the City Attorney be directed to further research the matter
and to report any findings at a future City Council meeting. Councilman Roberts requested that the
Attorney's research include the weed abatement service.
Ms. Jennifer Slaughter, Ms. Christine Scott, and Ms. Wendy Bennett, members of the Chaparral
Stadium Committee, expressed appreciation to the City Council for its generous donation in order
R:~Agenda\072799
2
for the Committee to meet its goal of $100,000.
presented T-shirts to the Councilmembers.
Reiterating their appreciation, the Committee
Relaying his delight with the football team being able to play a home game on its own field, Mr. Matt
Wright reiterated the Committee's appreciation to the City Council for its donation.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Councilman Roberrs relayed his delight with the High Speed Rail Authority's final decision to
reroute the Inland Route through Interstate 15 and 215.
B. Councilman Lindemans advised that the RTA has allocated, without impacting the reserve,
$125,000 for the completion of a public transportation system study with possible matching funds
from RCTC.
C. Councilman Comerchero commended Councilmen Lindemans and Roberts on a job well
done. Being on the League of California Cities Community Services Policy Committee, Mr.
Comerchero commented on a bond issue for Parks and Recreation and advised that the issue, if
approved by the voters, would greatly benefit the City.
D. Mayor Ford commented on bond issues and associated difficulties with attaining the funds.
E. City Attorney Thorson noted that with respect to Closed Session Item Nos. 1 and 3 (real
property), the City Council gave direction to staff and that the final agreements, if agreed upon, will
be forwarded to the City Council for approval in Open Session. With respect to Closed Session
Item No. 2 (pending litigation), the City Council gave direction to the City Attorney and with respect
to Item No. 4 (candidates for City Manager position), the matter would be discussed by Mayor Ford
in Open Session.
F. At this time, Mayor Ford announced that the City Council unanimously chose to appoint
Acting City Manager Nelson as the permanent City Manager of the City of Temecula. During this
time of transition, Mayor Ford extended a job well done to the entire City Staff.
Newly appointed City Manager Nelson enthusiastically accepted the position; echoed Mayor
Ford's comment by extending a job well done to the entire City Staff; and expressed appreciation
to the City Council for its support.
G. There being no objection from the City Council, Mayor Ford recommended that Agenda Item
No. 29 be considered out of order at this time.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the
agenda.
R:~,genda\072799
3
3
4
Resolution Approvin.q List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-73
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT
Amendment No. 4 to Police Services Contract
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Authorize modification to the City's current law enforcement contract with Riverside
County to add one traffic officer and one special team officer to increase patrol
hours by the equivalent of two full-time patrol officers and to authorize the Mayor to
execute the contract in substantially the form attached.
Authorization of Special Tax Levy in Community Facilities District No. 88-12 (Ynez
Corridor)
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-74
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-12 (YNEZ
CORRIDOR)
Award of Contract for P.C. Workstations
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Award a contract for Pentium based computer workstations to Tech 101-Arcus, Inc.,
16812 Millikan Avenue, Irvine, California, in the amount of $2,365.11 per unit, for a
total purchase amount of $243,606.59.
(This Item was pulled.)
R:~Agenda\072799
4
6 Agreement between City of Temecula and BidAmerica
8
9
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve an Agreement for the scanning of building permits for the Building and
Safety Department in its proposed for an amount not to exceed $37,760.45.
Contract Plan Checkin.q Services - JAS Pacific, Inc.
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Approve an Agreement for plan check services with JAS Pacific, Inc. and the
Building and Safety Department in the amount of $25,000;
7.2 Approve a 10% or $2,500 contingency for plan check services.
Contract Inspection Services Agreement for JAS Pacific, Inc.
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
Approve an Agreement for Consultant Services for JAS Pacific, Inc., in the amount
of $60,320 to continue providing building inspection services to the Building and
Safety Department.
Contract Inspection Services for Building and Safety
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1
Approve an Agreement for Consultant Services with P & D Consultants in an
amount not to exceed $60,000 to provide supplemental building inspection services
to the Building and Safety Department.
10 Approval of Funds for Plan Review Services
11
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Approve a Contract Agreement in an amount not to exceed $75,000 for Plan Check
Services with Esgil Corporation;
10.2 Approve a Contract Agreement in an amount not to exceed $75,000 for Plan Check
Services with VanDorpe Chou and Associates.
Authorization to execute the Supplemental Agreement for the 1999-00 Fiscal Year
Community Development Block Grant Funds
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Authorize the Mayor to execute the Supplemental Agreement for the 1999-00 Fiscal
Year Community Development Block Grant Funds;
R:~Agenda\072799
5
11.2
Authorize the Director of Finance to execute Sub-Recipient Agreements for
administration of the Fiscal Year 1999-00 Community Development Block Grant
Funds.
(Councilman Roberts abstained with regard to this Item.)
Mayor Ford clarified that the funds ($10,000) allocated to the Boys and Girls Club will be
utilized for the Temecula facility.
12 Memorandum of Understanding for Emergency Ambulance Services
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1
Approve the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Temecula
and the County of Riverside, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Agency, for joint
monitoring of Ambulance Services.
13 Riverside County LibraN Contract Amendment
14
15
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Authorize the City Manager to execute the Second Amendment to Agreement to
provide Library Services (additional staff);
13.2
Authorize the expenditure of an amount not to exceed $150,000 to fund the
Temecula Library Volunteer Coordinator half-time position and to subsidize funding
to maintain the Senior Reference Librarian and Reference Librarian positions at the
fiscal year 1998-99 level for fiscal year 1999-00.
Citywide Tree Trimming Maintenance Service
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Award the Citywide Tree Trimming Maintenance Services contract to West Coast
Arborists, Inc., for $150,000.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract;
14.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $15,000.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
Authorize Chan.qe to TemporaN Partial Street Closures for Bike Races from July 31, 1999
to September 25, 1999 ('Business Park Drive and Single Oak Drive)
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R:~,genda\072799
6
RESOLUTION NO. 99-75
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 99-
67 WHICH AUTHORIZED PARTIAL STREET CLOSURES OF
BUSINESS PARK DRIVE AND SINGLE OAK DRIVE FOR THE
TEMECULA CYCLING CLASSIC STAGE RACE ON JULY 25,
1999, AND THE RIVERSIDE CYCLING CLUB RACE ON JULY
31, 1999, TO CHANGE THE LATTER DATE TO SEPTEMBER
25, 1999, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE
PERMITS FOR THESE SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENTS
16
17
18
Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 21821 (located northwesterly of Via Norte at
Kahwea Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Accept the public street and water improvements in Tract No. 21821;
16.2 Authorize reduction in Faithful Performance securityto the warranty level, initiation
of the one-year warranty period and release of the Traffic Signalization Mitigation
security;
16.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
Acceptance of Public Street into the City-Maintained Street System within Tract No. 21821
(located northwesterly of Via Norte at Kahwea Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-76
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO
THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT
NO. 21821 )
Substitute Agreements and Securities in Tract No. 24188-1 ((located northwesterly of
intersection of Butterfield Stage Road at De Portola Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1
Accept the substitute Subdivision Improvement and Subdivision Monument
Agreements and Faithful Performance, Labor and Materials, and Subdivision
Monumentation Securities in Tract No. 24188-1;
18.2 Authorize release of the Faithful Performance, Labor and Materials, and Subdivision
Monumentation Securities on file;
18.3 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the developer and sureties.
R:~,genda\072799
7
19 First Street Brid.qe Project- Project No. PW95-08
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1
Approve agreement in the amount of $80,540 with Tom Dodson & Associates to
monitor the environmental impacts associated with the construction of the First
Street Bridge - Project No. PW95-08 - and authorize the Mayor to execute this
agreement.
(Mayor Pro Tem Stone abstained with regard to this Item.)
20 Renewal of Annual Street Stripin.q Contract for FY99-00 - Project No. PW97-28
21
22
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1
Approve the extension of the Street Striping Contract with Pacific Striping, Inc. of
Whittier for Fiscal Year 1999-00 for a period one (1) year beginning July 1, 1999, in
an amount of $150,000.00;
20.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $15,000.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
Tract Map No. 23100-7 (located south of La Serena Way, east of Meadows Parkway,
west of Butterfield Sta.qe Road, and north of Rancho California Road in the Mar.qarita
Villa.qe Specific Plan No. 199
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1 Approve Tract Map No. 23100-7 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval;
21.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement;
21.3
Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful
Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond, and Monument Bond as security for
the agreements.
A.qreement for Professional Service with Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates for I-
15/SR-79 South Interchan.qe Project Study Report (PSR) PW96-05 and I-15/Santia.clo
Road New Connection Concept Analysis - Project No. PW99-03
RECOMMENDATION:
22.1
Approve an agreement with Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates to provide
professional engineering services for the preparation of the I-15/SR-79 South
Interchange Project Study Report (PSR) and I-15/Santiago Road New Connection
Concept Analysis for an amount not to exceed $86,776.00 and authorize the Mayor
to execute the agreement;
22.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of 10% of the contract or $8,677.60.
R:~Agenda\072799
8
23 Acceptance of Grant of Easement of Storm Drain Improvements for the First Street Brid.qe
RECOMMENDATION:
23.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-77
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR
STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO THE FIRST
STREET BRIDGE
(Mayor Pro Tem Stone abstained with regard to this Item.)
24 Second Readin.q of Ordinance No. 99-18
RECOMMENDATION:
24.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-18
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA97-0446 (ZONING AMENDMENT, MAP
CHANGE) AMENDING THE CITY'S ZONING MAP, CHANGING
THE ZONING OF 1.07 NET ACRES FROM LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL L1 (I ACRE TO 2.~i ACRE NET LOT SIZE) TO
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL L2 ('1/2 ACRE TO 1 ACRE NET
LOT SIZE) ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF ESTERO STREET AND ORMSBY ROAD AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 945-070-011
(Mayor Pro Tem Stone abstained with regard to this Item.)
25 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 99-19
RECOMMENDATION:
25.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
R:~Agenda\072799
9
ORDINANCE NO. 99-19
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA99-0104, AMENDMENT NO. I TO
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 263 (THE TEMECULA REGIONAL
CENTER), AMENDING SECTION IV.E.4., TO ALLOW A 21-
FOOT HIGH ENTERTAINMENT MARQUEE ON PROPERTY
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER
ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NOS. 910-130-052, -053, AND -054
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 25 The
motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected approval with the
exception of Mayor Pro Tem Stone who abstained with regard to Item No. 19, 23, and 24 and
Councilman Roberts who abstained with regard to Item No. 11.
At 7:58 P.M., Mayor Ford called a recess and reconvened the meeting at 8:12 P.M.
There being no objection from the City Council, Mayor Ford recommended that Agenda Item
No. 29 be considered out of order at this time.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 29 DISCUSSED OUT OF ORDER
29
Infestation of the insect - Glassy-winged Sharpshooter
RECOMMENDATION:
29.1
Consider funding in an amount not to exceed $25,000 to the University of
California Riverside (UCR) for immediate research toward the recent infestation
of this insect in our local wineries.
Management Analyst Adams presented the staff report (of record) and introduced Mr. David
Turch, Federal lobbyist from Washington, D.C., who provided an update on efforts being
undertaken to identify agricultural grants in order to address the eradication of this insect.
Apprising the public and Councilmembers of the damage this insect has caused and
commenting on the potential destruction of the wineries if a resolution to the eradication of this
insect were not found, Ms. Joan Sparkman, 40213 Colony Drive, elaborated on the funds
($250,000) necessary to begin the procedure to eradicate this insect/disease with a total
implementation cost of $2.5 million. Ms. Sparkman requested that the City Council consider a
donation which would be matched by the County.
Mr. Ben Drake, 45650 Bowery Lane, provided more detailed information with regard to this
disease, an affective insecticide that has been utilized for the past two years, and cost per
application ($80 per acre).
In light of his experience, Mr. John Moramarco, P.O. Box 966, noted that he has never seen a
disease as devastating as this one. By way of pictures, Mr. Moramarco further described the
impact this disease has had on the vineyards and noted that if this problem were not rectified,
there will be no wineries within the next two to three years.
R:~Agenda\072799
10
Providing additional clarification with regard to this disease, Mr. Mike Rennie, 39114 Blackdeer
Loop, co-owner of Stage Ranch Farms, apprised the Council of his losses as a result of this
disease.
Mr. Roberto Ponte, 40500 Camino Del Vino, as well apprised the Council of his losses as a
result of this disease.
Having met with the Members of the Vintners Association, Mayor Pro Tem Stone relayed his
understanding of the potential devastation. In light of this potential devastation, Mr. Stone
encouraged the City Council to approve a $100,000 donation with matching funds by the County
for a total of $200,000.
Although the area of discussion is not located within the City of Temecula, Councilman
Comerchero commented on how the City's identity is associated with the wineries and,
therefore, relayed his concurrence with appropriating $100,000.
City Manager Nelson recommended that the suggested $100,000 be appropriated from Capital
Projects.
MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to appropriate $100,000 toward the infestation of
this insect. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone. (This motion was ultimately
amended; see below.)
In light of the needed funds ($250,000) to begin this monitoring process, Councilman
Lindemans noted that if the City were to donate $100,000 with matching funds from the City,
there would still be a $50,000 shortfall.
Considering the devastation this disease could as well have on citrus and landscaping species,
Mayor Ford recommended that the City appropriate $125,000 with matching funds from the
County and that Mr. Turch continue to explore all possible funding alternatives.
MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to approve an expenditure of $125,000 with
matching funds by the County of Riverside. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Stone and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman Roberts who
abstained.
At 9:12 P.M., Mayor Ford called a recess and reconvened the meeting at 9:25 P.M.
At this time, the City Council returned to regular agenda order.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
26
An Appeal of the Planning Commission's Decision to Recommend Approval to the City
Council for PA98-0511, a Zonin.cl Amendment to create a Planned Development Overlay,
and the Planning Commission's approval of PA98-0512, a proposal to develop a 244-unit
senior apartment complex with two- and three-story buildin.qs on an 8.13 acre lot
RECOMMENDATION:
26.1 Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA98-12;
26.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R:~Agenda\072799
11
RESOLUTION NO. 99-78
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DENYING THE APPEAL OF PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA98-0511 (ZONING AMENDMENT-
APPEAL) AND PA 98-0512 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN-APPEAL)
UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO
RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0511 (ZONING
AMENDMENT) TO ESTABLISH A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
OVERLAY AND TO APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO
PA98-0512 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) FOR THE DEVELOPMENT
OF A 244-UNIT SENIOR HOUSING COMPLEX ON THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND
WINCHESTER ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NO. 911-170-078 AND 911-170-085
26.3 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-20
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP AND
DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CITY
FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS LOTS 166 AND 181 OF THE
TEMECULA LAND AND WATER COMPANY ALSO KNOWN AS
PARCEL A OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PA 98-0477,
PREVIOUSLY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 911-170-078 AND
911-170-085 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0511 )
By way of a map and computer-generated elevation drawings, Deputy City Manager Thornhill
presented the staff report (of record), noting the following:
· That the project site will include a combination of two- and three-story buildings;
· That proposed fencing and security gates will be installed to ensure prohibition
of high school student cut-through;
· That the Planning Commission added the following additional condition:
That the applicant shall prepare and submit for the approval of the
Planning Manager a disclosure statement identifying the adjacent high
school uses and those uses reasonably anticipated to occur at the
high school site. The applicant shall provide a copy of the approved
disclosure statement to each person occupying a unit in the project.
Deputy City Manager Thornhill requested that the City Council uphold the above-noted
condition of approval.
At this time, Mayor Ford opened the public hearing.
Mr. Curtis Miller, 4220 Von Karman Avenue, co-owner of the subject site, Newport Beach,
clarified his choice of the proposed site because of its proximity to the mall, services, and
R:~Agenda\072799
12
housing and noted that the active senior citizens have served as tutors and mentors to such
facilities as high schools and would, therefore, view the proposed use as compatible.
Mr. Chris Pedersen, the appellant, cited five primary issues as justification for denying the
project (as attached to the staff report) and noted that, in his opinion, the developer made no
effort to conform to the existing BP zone and that senior citizens and high school students are
not a compatible use.
In response to Mayor Pro Stone, it was noted that letters/preliminary reviews of the project were
sent to various agencies and that no letters of opposition were received by staff.
By way of photos, Mr. Gary Nogle, 238 San Diego Avenue, San Diego, general partner,
referenced a similar facility in San Marcos at which his mother resides. Having discussed this
facility in San Marcos with the City staff, the high school principal, and the manager of the
facility, Mr. Nogle advised that he has not been apprised of any incompatibility issues. Contrary
to the incompatibility concern, Mr. Nogle commented on how the high school students assist the
senior citizens during evening hours and summer time and how the senior citizens assist by
tutoring and mentoring.
Mr. James Milkartz, 15375 Barranca Parkway, #F101, Irvine, architect of the proposed project,
addressed proposed density, floor plan, indoor and outdoor recreational facilities, size of the
units, and noted that the PDO-3 Zone does restrict this site to senior housing to preclude the
possibility of switching the use.
On behalf of the Members of the Seniors Golden Years of Temecula Valley, Mr. Wayne
Bershaw, 30149 Corte Cantera, commented on the need for such housing and voiced no
concerns with regard to compatibility and, therefore, encouraged the City to support this project.
Mr. Peter Sterling, 2398 San Diego Avenue, San Diego, owner of the property, commented on
the close proximity of shops to the proposed facility as well as to Santa Gertrudis Creek
pathway and noted that he would not envision this facility creating a traffic compatibility issue.
Mr. Ed EIder, 42775 San Julian Place, spoke in support of senior housing but not at this
particular location.
With regard to the compatibility concern, Mayor Pro Tem Stone relayed his concurrence with the
approval of this project and commented on the need for senior housing.
Echoing Mayor Pro Tem Stone's comments, Councilman Comerchero expressed no concern
with regard to compatibility and as well commented on the additionally imposed conditions as
per the Planning Commission.
Councilman Roberts commented on the City's need for additional housing and expressed
support of the project in light of its close proximity to the shops and the Santa Gertrudis Creek
pathway.
Mayor Ford echoed previously made comments, noting that compatibility is not an issue of
concern to him.
For the City Council, Planning Chairman Guerriero addressed and clarified ingress and egress
into the facility.
R:%Agenda\072799
13
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Stone moved to approve staff recommendations 26.1 and 26.2, to
deny the appeal, and to approve the project. The motion was seconded by Councilman
Lindemans and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
City Attorney Thorson introduced Ordinance No. 99-20 by title only.
MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to approve staff recommendation 26.3. The motion
was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
27
Ordinance Regulating Massage Establishments and Massa.qe Practitioners ('Plannin.q
Application PA97-0201 )
RECOMMENDATION:
27.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
TEMECULA
REGULATIONS
THE CITY OF
TEMECULA
REGULATIONS
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 5.22 TO THE
MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING
FOR MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS WITHIN
TEMECULA AND CHAPTER 5.23 TO THE
MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING
FOR MASSAGE PRACTITIONERS WITHIN
THE CITY OF TEMECULA REPEALING RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ORDINANCE NO. 596 AS AD OPTED BY THE CITY AND
AMENDING SECTION 1.08.010 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ADOPTION BY REFERENCE
OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY ORDINANCES
Being of the opinion that insufficient feedback has been received from the existing and
legitimate vendors, Mayor Pro Tem Stone recommended that the matter be continued.
Concurring with Mayor Pro Tem Stone, Councilman Lindemans suggested the formation of a
subcommittee comprised of two Councilmembers and the massage professionals.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Stone moved to continue this item to the September 28, 1999, City
Council meeting and to appoint Councilman Lindemans and Mayor Pro Tem Stone to serve on
the subcommittee. The motion was seconded by Councilman Lindemans and voice vote
reflected unanimous approval.
28
Adoption of an Urgency Ordinance Prohibiting the Permittin.q, Approval, Development,
and Placement of Additional Wireless Communications Facilities
RECOMMENDATION:
28.1 Adopt an Urgency Ordinance:
R:~Agenda\072799
14
ORDINANCE NO. 99-21
AN URGENCY AND REGULAR INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING AN EXTENSION OF ORDINANCE NO. 99-17
WHICH ESTABLISHED A PROHIBITION ON THE PERMITTING,
APPROVAL, DEVELOPMENT, AND PLACEMENT OF ALL
FORMS OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES AND
MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
City Attorney Thorson reviewed the staff report (of record).
Opposing the moratorium on erecting wireless communications facilities, Mayor Pro Tem Stone
commented on the loss of wireless communication throughout several areas of the City and
noted the public safety issue such a loss could create.
Councilman Comerchero noted that this moratorium would only be in place for several months
to ensure proper procedure for future requests.
MOTION: Councilman Roberts moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of
Mayor Pro Tem Stone who voted n._9o.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
29
Infestation of the insect - Glassy-winged Sharpshooter
(at the request of Mayor Pro Tem Stone)
RECOMMENDATION:
29.1
Consider funding in an amount not to exceed $25,000 to the University of California
Riverside (UCR) for immediate research toward the recent infestation of this insect
in our local wineries.
(Previously discussed; see pages 10-11 .)
30
Award of Construction Contract for Rancho California Road at I-15 Ramp Improvements -
Project No. PW95-12 ~PW98-08)
RECOMMENDATION:
30.1
Award a construction contract for the Rancho California Road at 115 Ramp
Improvements, Project PW95-12 (PW98-08) to McLaughlin Engineering & Mining,
Inc., in the amount of $756,965.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
30.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve contract change orders, not to exceed the
contingency amount of $75,696.50, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
30.3 Approve a transfer of $50,000.00 from the Overland Drive Overcrossing project
savings to the Rancho California Road Additional Interchange projects.
Mayor Ford thanked staff for their associated efforts.
R:~genda\072799
15
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Stone moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Lindemans and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
31 Nicolas Road Sidewalk Project
RECOMMENDATION:
31.1 Receive and file a status report regarding the Nicolas Road Sidewalk Project.
Mayor Pro Tem Stone thanked Acting Public Works Director Hughes for his efforts in completing
this project. Mr. Hughes noted that he would pass on the commendation to Deputy Public
Works Director Parks.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
No additional comments.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
City Manager Nelson advised that staff has received a letter from the League of California
Cities, advising that the City of Temecula will be awarded the Helen Putman Award of
Excellence for the Old Town Streetscape Project. Mr. Nelson noted that the award would be
presented at the League's Annual Conference, in October, in San Jose. City Manager Nelson
extended commendations to Acting Public Works Director Hughes, Housing Redevelopment
Manager Meyer, and Management Analyst Adams.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
No additional comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 10:50 P.M., Mayor Ford formally adjourned the City Council meeting to Tuesday, August 10,
1999, 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula California.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:~Agenda\072799
16
ITEM 3
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office
of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the
amount of $ 5,881,370.21.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 14th day of September 1999.
A'I'rEST:
Steven J, Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
[SEAL]
Resos 99-
STATE OF CALl FORN IA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 99- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Coundl of the City of Temecula
on the 14b day of September 1999 by the following roll cell vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
Resos 99-
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
08/19/99 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
08/26/99 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
09102199 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
09/14/99 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
08/19/99 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:
09/02/99 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 09114199 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001
165
190
191
192
193
194
210
2b,
2~0
300
310
320
330
340
460
470
GENERAL FUND
RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND
CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY*CIP
INSURANCE FUND
VEHICLES FUND
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
SUPPORT SERVICES
FACILITIES
CFD 88-12 DEBT SERVICE FUND
CFD 98-1 DEBT SERVICE FUND
CFD 98-1 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND
$ 1,150,215,40
43,098.49
124,540.42
18,276.05
26,147.51
16,476.86
572.68
2,427,068.19
561.80
4! 905.27
9,848.07
45,812.66
48,906.24
5,814.75
15,525.90
1,055,294.83
445,802.00
459.00
$ 364,903.87
2,148,369.98
701,892.53
2,267,159.74
199,054.78
199,989.31
$ 5,881,370.21
$ 5,482,326.12
100
165
190
191
193
194
280
300
320
330
340
GENERAL FUND
RDA-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP
INSURANCE FUND
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
SUPPORT SERVICES
FACILITIES
TOTAL BYFUND:
280,854,83
6,546.62
81,685.05
139.41
4,920.67
1,228.39
3,405.20
1,411.70
8,416.80
2,904.22
7,531.20
399,044.09
$ 5,881,370.21
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
, HEREBY CERTIFY That THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
VOUCHRE2
08/19/99
11:35
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
AMOUNT
185~837.67
695,29
30,983.39
17,035.41
26,147.51
4,375.73
5.00
49,945.44
34,089.50
83.58
11,151.61
1,474.94
3,078.80
TOTAL 364,903.87
VOUCHRE2
08/19/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
57342
57342
57342
57343
57346
57347
57348
57348
57348
57349
57349
57350
57351
57352
57353
57353
57353
57354
57355
57356
57357
57358
57359
57360
57361
57361
57362
57363
57363
57364
57364
11:35
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
08/16/99 003713 BULLET PAINTING
08/16/99 003713 BULLET PAINTING
08/16/99 003713 BULLET PAINTING
08/16/99 001590 CALIF REDEVELOPMENT ASS
08/19/99 000724 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI
08/19/99 001515 A S A P TRUCK,TRACTOR/F
08/19/99 001391 ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOCIA
08/19/99 001391 ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOCIA
08/19/99 001391 ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOCIA
08/19/99 003799 ALKHAS, JACQUELYN
08/19/99 003799 ALKHAS, JACQUELYN
08/19/99 000747 AMERICAN PLANN]NG ASSOC
08/19/99 003520 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COM
08/19/99 001947 AMERIGAS
08/19/99 000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
08/19/99 000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
08/19/99 000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
08/19/99 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY
08/19/99 003771 BACK ALLEY BICYCLE PRO
08/19/99 BEE SMART PROJECT
08/19/99 BRAUN, SUSAN
08/19/99 001260 C P R S
08/19/99 001089 CALIF DEBT & INVESTMENT
08/19/99 003629 CALTROP ENGINEERING COR
08/19/99 002534 CATERERS CAFE
08/19/99 002534 CATERERS CAFE
08/19/99 001193 COMP U S A INC
08/19/99 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL
08/19/99 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL
08/19/99 003210 DALLAS MIDWEST
08/19/99 003210 DALLAS MIDWEST
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
CREDIT: INVOICE EXCEEDED P.O.
FACADE IMPROVEMENT PRGM:OAK PK
FACADE IMPROVEMENT PRGM:OAK PK
CRA AWARD PRGM FEE:OLD TWN STR
RECREATION PROMO SHIRTS
ILLEGAL DUMPING CLEAN-UP
20"DIAMETER RING BUOY
(24) KIEFER KICK BOARDS
FREIGHT
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
MEMBERSHIP: PATRICIA ANDERS
LICENSE FOR USE OF LIVE MUSIC
PROPANE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
TEMP HELP W/E 07/10 WILLIAMS
TEMP HELP W/E 07/10 WILLIAMS
TEMP HELP W/E 08/07 WORTHEN
SHIRTS FOR MAINTENANCE STAFF
BICYCLE MNTC/PARTS-POLICE DEPT
A.HONEY BEES CF:O9/22:KH & BW
REFUND: LEVEL 6/7 SWIM LESSONS
EMPLOYMENT ADS IN JOB LINE
MUN SECURITIES REG CF:IO/5:GR
JUL BRIDGE INSPECTION-PALA
REFRESHMENT FOR 08/04 MTG
REFRESHMENTS FOR 8/5 MTG
MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES
CRC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
CRC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
(2) HANGING CHAIR CADDYS
FREIGHT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
280-199-813-5804
280-199-813-5804
280-199-813-5804
280-199-999-5362
190-180-999-5301
001-164-601-5402
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
001-161-999-5226
280-199-999-5250
001-162-999-5263
280-199-999-5118
280-199-999-5118
001-162-999-5118
190-180-999-5243
001-170-999-5215
190-180-999-5261
190-183-4975
190-180-999-5254
001-140-999-5261
210-165-631-5801
001-161-999-5260
001-161-999-5260
320-199-999-5221
190-182-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
190-184-999-5242
190-184-999-5242
ITEM
AMOUNT
651.00-
5,479.00
651.00
125.00
801.66
500.00
39.35
126.00
19.56
84.00
144.00
167.00
150.00
125.96
303.15
251.55
330.24
822.50
680.72
100.00
30.00
161.50
125.00
3,010.00
121.06
10.70
176.11
49.60
301.39
596.00
118.00
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
5,479.00
125.00
801.66
500.00
184.91
228.00
167.00
150.00
125.96
884.94
822.50
680.72
100.00
30.00
161.50
125.00
3,010.00
131.76
176.11
350.99
VOUCHRE2
08/19/99 11:35
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
57364 08/19/99 003210 DALLAS MIDWEST
SALES TAX 190-184-999-5242
43.21
757.21
57365 08/19/99 DIAZ, ELDA
REFUND: TODDLER SWIM LESSONS 190-183-4975
22.00
22.00
57366 08/19/99 DONAHOE, BLANCA
REFUND: LEVEL 5 SWIM LESSONS 190-183-4975
25.00
25.00
57367 08/19/99 000609 DOUBLETREE HOTEL
HOTEL:C.C.P.O.A. CF:9/21-24/99 001-170-999-5261
332.28
332.28
57368 08/19/99 003384 DRAIN PATROL
REPAIR DRAIN TO ICE MACHINE 001-171-999-5212
392.00
392.00
57369 08/19/99 001714 DREAM ENGINEERING INC
57369 08/19/99 001714 DREAM ENGINEERING INC
DESIGN SVCS:TENNIS COURT LIGHT 210-190-155-5802
DESIGN SVCS:TENNIS COURT LIGHT 210-190-155-5802
471.00
552.00
1,023.00
57370 08/19/99 001380 E S
57370 08/19/99 001380 E S
57370 08/19/99 001380 E S
57370 08/19/99 001380 E S
57370 08/19/99 001380 E S
57370 08/19/99 001380 E S
57370 08/19/99 001380 E S
57370 08/19/99 001380 E S
57370 08/19/99 001380 E S
57370 08/19/99 001380 E S
57370 08/19/99 001380 E S
57371 08/19/99 002390
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT BERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
TEMP HELP W/E 07/30 WILLIAMS
TEMP HELP W/E 07/30 GORMAN
TEMP HELP W/E 07/02 MENDOZA
TEMP HELP W/E 07/02 MENDOZA
TEMP HELP W/E 07/02 MENDOZA
TEMP HELP W/E 07/16 MENDOZA
TEMP HELP W/E 07/16 MENDOZA
TEMP HELP W/E 07/16 MENDOZA
TEMP HELP W/E 07/30 MENDOZA
TEMP HELP W/E 07/30 MENDOZA
TEMP HELP W/E 07/30 MENDOZA
95366-02 DIEGO DR LDSCP
001-162-999-5118
001-162-999-5118
330-199-999-5118
340-199-701-5118
340-199-702-5118
330-199-999-5118
340-199-701-5118
340-199-702-5118
330-199-999-5118
340-199-701-5118
340-199-702-5118
193-180-999-5240
1,096.26
1,890.33
441.99
286.20
122.66
442.00
309.40
132.60
442.00
309.40
132.60
622.80
5,605.44
622.80
57372 08/19/99 002438 ENGEN CORPORATION
GEOTECHNICAL SVCS:WINCH MEDIAN 210-165-686-5804
468.75
468.75
57373 08/19/99 002939
57373 08/19/99 002939
57373 08/19/99 002939
57374 08/19/99 002060
57374 08/19/99 002060
ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R
ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R
ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R
EUROPEAN DELI& CATERIN
EUROPEAN DELI& CATERIN
MNTC:PRIM ARC/INFO FLOAT LICEN
MNTC:ARCPRESS FLOATING LICENSE
SALES TAX
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MEALS
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MEALS
001-161-610-5217
001-161-610-5217
001-161-610-5217
001-100-999-5260
001-100-999-5260
3,000.00
200.00
248.00
185.32
201.43
3,448.00
386.75
57375 08/19/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
57375 08/19/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
57375 08/19/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
57375 08/19/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
57375 08/19/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
57375 08/19/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
57375 0B/19/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
57375 08/19/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
57375 08/19/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
57375 08/19/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
57375 08/19/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
57375 08/19/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
57375 08/19/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
57376 08/19/99 003612
FIRE PREVENTION SERVICE
LDSCP IMPROV:TEM VLLY MUSEUM
LDSCP IMPROV:TEM VLLY MUSEUM
LDSCP REPAIRS: R.C. CHANNEL
LDSCP REPAIRS: TCC
LDSCP REPAIRS:PDS EXTRA HEADS
LDSCP REPAIRS: RIVERTON PARK
LDSCP REPAIRS: CORTE CANTERA
LDSCP REPAIRS:CALLE MEDUSA
LDSCP REPAIRS: WINCHESTER RD
LDSCP REPAIRS: CALLE MIRADA
LDSCP REPAIRS:CALLE MEDUSA
LDSCP REPAIRS: CRC
LDSCP REPAIRB:MARGARITA MEDIAN
REMIT FIRE PREVENTION REVENUE
190-185-999-5415
190-185-999-5415
193-180-999-5212
190-184-999-5415
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
193-180-999-5212
193-180-999-5212
193-180-999-5212
193-180-999-5212
193-180-999-5212
190-182-999-5415
193-180-999-5212
001-162-4264
2,406.00
910.00
495.33
224.65
116.99
69.71
169.79
157.63
98.31
49.92
48.17
460.00
122.30
4,324.77
5,328.80
4,324.77
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/19/99 11:35 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
57377 08/19/99 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO LOT BOOK REPT:27050 FALLING CR 165-199-813-5804
57377 08/19/99 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO LOT BOOK REPT:27170 RAINBOW CR 165-199-813-5804
57377 08/19/99 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO LOT BOOK REPT: 43740 CAJON DR 165-199-813-5804
150.00
150.00
150.00
450.00
57378 08/19/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XX-0902 J.O'GRADY: PROF MTG 001-111-999-5260
57378 08/19/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XX-0902 J.O'GRADY: SISTER CITY 001-101-999-5280
57378 08/19/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XX-2576 S.NELSON:ICMA PUB/MTG 001-110-999-5260
57378 08/19/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XX-2576 S.NELSON:ICMA PUB/MTG 001-110-999-5228
57378 08/19/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XX-5288 S.JONES: NOVELL 320-199-999-5211
57378 08/19/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XX-5288 S.JONES: MINDSPRING 320-199-999-5211
57378 08/19/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XX-5288S.JONES: AIR TICKET SJ 001-120-999-5258
57378 08/19/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XX-5288 S.JONES:REFRESHMENT MT 001-100-999-5260
75.96
83.96
13.51
46.00
106.68
471.44
112.50
119.06
1,029.11
57379 08/19/99 FRANK, CYNTHIA REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900
100.00
100.00
57380 08/19/99 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA ~ PAYM 909 197-5072 GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208
57380 08/19/99 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 506-1941 PTA CD TTACSD 320-199-999-5208
57381 08/19/99 001355 G T E CALIFORNIA INC AUG ACCESS-RVSD OPEN PHONELINE 320-199-999-5208
4,701.61
55.61
320.00
4,757.22
320.00
57382 08/19/99 GARCIA, NATALIE
REFUND: MCP PICNIC SHELTER 190-183-4990
30.00
30.00
57383 08/19/99 000173 GENERAL BINDING CORPORA LAMINATION FOR COPY CENTER 330-199-999-5220
99.11
99.11
57384 08/19/99 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE (12) 25FT RED SNAG PRF. CABLE 320-199-999-5221
57384 08/19/99 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE (2) HIVAL CD-RW MEDIA IO-PACK 320-199-999-5221
57384 08/19/99 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221
57384 08/19/99 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE SALES TAX 320-199-999-5221
57384 08/19/99 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE (4)HP JETDIRECT PARALLEL PORT 320-199-999-5242
57384 08/19/99 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE FREIGHT 320-199-999-5242
57384 08/19/99 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE FREIGHT 320-199-999-5242
57384 08/19/99 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE SALES TAX 320-199-999-5242
57384 08/19/99 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE SALES TAX 320-199-999-5242
119.88
75.98
17.31
15.72
580.00
1.96
5.62
11.66
33.52
861.65
57385 08/19/99 002936 GREAT EVENTS PUBLISHING CARDS/RIBBONS:CANCER AWARENESS 001-150-999-5261
102.85
102.85
57386 08/19/99 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY I ALARM MONITORING: STOREFRONT 001-170-999-5229
55.50
55.5O
57387 08/19/99 GUTTIREZ, JASON M. REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900
100.00
100.00
57388 08/19/99
H & L CHARTER COMPANY, EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION TOUR BUS 001-150-999-5250
456.00
456.00
57389 08/19/99 001697 HALL, NANCY LEE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330
153.60
153.60
57390 08/19/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC
57390 08/19/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC
HARDWARE SUPPLIES - TCSD 190-180-999-5212
HARDWARE SUPPLIES - RECREATION 190-180-999-5301
717.10
225.46
942.56
57391 08/19/99 002372 HARMON, JUDY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330
365.20
365.20
57392 08/19/99 HART, CRYSTAL REFUND: CRC ROOM RENTAL 190-183-4990 110.00 110.00
VOUCHRE2
08/19/99 11:35
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
57393 08/19/99 001119
57394 08/19/99 000194
57394 08/19/99 000194
57394 08/19/99 000194
57394 08/19/99 000194
57394 08/19/99 000194
57395 08/19/99 001314
57396 08/19/99 001407
57397 08/19/99 000199
57398 08/19/99 002695
57399 08/19/99 003659
57399 08/19/99 003659
57400 08/19/99 003223
57401 08/19/99
57402 08/19/99 001534
57403 08/19/99 002187
57404 08/19/99
57405 08/19/99 000210
57406 08/19/99 001269
57407 08/19/99
57408 08/19/99
57408 08/19/99
57409 08/19/99 003782
57409 08/19/99 003782
57410 08/19/99 001967
57410 08/19/99 001967
57410 08/19/99 001967
57410 08/19/99 001967
57410 08/19/99 001967
57410 08/19/99 001967
57410 08/19/99 001967
57411 08/19/99 002693
VENDOR
NAME
HOUSTON & HARRIS PiPE C
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
IES-APA
INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC
J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN
J K WEIGLE ENGINEERING
J K WEIGLE ENGINEERING
K E A ENVIRONMENTAL, IN
KHAN, BLANCA
LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV
LAKE ELSINORE ANIMAL FR
LANCEm JERRI
LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES
LIEBERT CASSIDTY & FRIE
LLOYD, MARGARET
M-A TEMEKU HILLS DEV. L
M-A TEMEKU HILLS DEV. L
MAIN STREET SIGNS
MAIN STREET SIGNS
MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV
MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV
MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV
MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV
MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV
MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV
MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV
MATROS# ANDREA
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
CITY WIDE CATCH BASIN CLEANING
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
DWTWN REVITALIZATION:8/19:STAF
CRC POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS
000199 IRS GARN
JUL BUILDING INSPECTIONS SVCS
AUG PRGSS:ROTARY PRK IMPROVMNT
RETENTION W/H ROTARY PRK IMPRV
BIOLOGICAL SVCS:PALA RD BRIDGE
REFUND: LEVEL 2 SWIM LESSONS
AIR:LEAGUE OF CAL:8/4:HP,HM,JM
JULY ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
REFUND: SUMMER DAY CAMP
DEPUTY BUILDING OFFICIAL AD
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP: GRANT YATES
REFUND: PARENT/ME SWIM LESSONS
OVERPAYMENT:MAP FEE:LD99-O32MP
OVERPAYMENT:MAP FEE:LD99-O32MP
MISC. SIGNS & MATERIALS:PW
MISC. SIGNS & MATERIALS:PW
TEMP HELP W/E 7/18 BELIAN
TEMP HELP W/E 7/25 SWANSON
TEMP HELP W/E 7/25 BELIAN
TEMP HELP W/E 7/25 COOK
TEMP HELP W/E 8/01BROMMET
TEMP HELP W/E 8/01BELIAN
TEMP HELP W/E 8/08 BELIAN
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-164-601-5401
001-2080
165-2080
190-2080
193-2080
280-2080
001-161-999-5260
190-182-999-5250
001-2140
001-162-999-5118
210-190-162-5804
210-2035
210-165-631-5801
190-183-4975
190-180-999-5258
001-172-999-5255
190-183-4984
001-150-999-5254
001-150-999-5226
190-183-4975
001-161-4107
001-163-4152
001-164-601-5244
001-164-601-5244
001-171-999-5118
001-110-999-5118
001-171-999-5118
001-140-999-5118
001-110-999-5118
001-171-999-5118
001-171-999-5118
190-183-999-5330
ITEM
AMOUNT
1,200.00
1,589.71
18.75
190.00
29.99
6.25
114.00
118.53
318.92
9,222.00
3,177.59
317.76-
1,926.98
25.00
525.00
4,921.15
75.00
468.00
207.50
30.00
9.00
180.00
166.15
103.44
452.79
63.86
464.40
185.76
179.96
481.82
458.60
369.60
PAGE 4
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,200.00
1,834.70
114.00
118.53
318.92
9,222.00
2,859.83
1,926.98
25.00
525.00
4,921,15
75.00
468.00
207.50
30.00
189.00
269.59
2,287.19
369.60
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/19/99 11:35 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
57412 08/19/99 MEYER, KENDRA
REFUND:INFANT/TODDLER READING 190-183-4982
30.00
30.00
57413 08/19/99 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS LETTERHEAD PAPER: B&S 001-162-999-5222
57413 08/19/99 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS LETTERHEAD ENVELOPES: B&S 001-162-999-5222
57413 08/19/99 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS QTY 2000 ENVELOPES: H.R. 001-150-999-5222
64.22
103.67
190.52
358.41
57414 08/19/99 MORIN, LEAH REFUND: SUMMER DAY CAMP 190-183-4984
65.00
65.00
57415 08/19/99 NAGGAR, MICHAEL S. REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900
100.00
100.00
57416 08/19/99 000718 NATIONAL RECREATION &PA ANNUAL NRPA CF:H.PARKER:#21539 190-180-999-5258
360.00
360.00
57417 08/19/99 NOBILE, DAWN
REFUND: PARENT/ME SWIM LESSONS 190-183-4975
35.00
35.00
57418 08/19/99 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT RECRUITMENT AD:FAC.CUSTODIAN 001-150-999-5254
57418 08/19/99 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT RECRUITMENT AD:MAINT. SUPERVSR 001-150-999-5254
57418 08/19/99 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT RECRUITMENT AD:REC.LEADER 001-150-999-5254
57418 08/19/99 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT RECRUITMENT AD:P/T OFFICE ASST 001-150-999-5254
76.38
78.40
60.48
78.40
293.66
57419 08/19/99 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-162-999-5214
57419 08/19/99 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-164-601-5214
57419 08/19/99 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 190-180-999-5214
236.03
280.63
116.27
632.93
57420 08/19/99 002088 OLD TOWN TYPEWRITER TYPEWRITER REPAIR & MAINT:C.M. 001-110-999-5250
120.00
120.00
57421 08/19/99 003803 P E R F / POP CONFERENC P.O.P. CF:SGT ALM/SGT HERRERA 001-170-999-5261
790.00
790.00
57422 08/19/99 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T 001-2122 266.29 266.29
57423 08/19/99 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: PW98-08 001-120-999-5256
57423 08/19/99 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: PW98-07 001-120-999-5256
57423 08/19/99 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: PW98-O1CSD 001-120-999-5256
57423 08/19/99 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: PA99-0301 001-161-999-5256
57423 08/19/99 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: PA99-0248 001-161-999-5256
57423 08/19/99 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: PA99-0249 001-161-999-5256
57423 08/19/99 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: ADVISORY 001-120-999-5256
67.68
68.15
67.68
18.25
23.00
18.00
169.50
432.26
57424 08/19/99 003155 PRICE CHOPPER INC AQUATIC SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5310
320.00
320.00
57425 08/19/99 002776 PRIME MATRIX INC JUL:SC-5001339-O:LINDEMANS 001-100-999-5208
57425 08/19/99 0027'/6 PRIME MATRIX INC AUG:SC-5001377-O:SR VAN 190-180-999-5208
57425 08/19/99 002776 PRIME MATRIX INC JUL:SC-5002330~8:CITY VAN 190-180-999-5208
57425 08/19/99 002776 PRIME MATRIX INC JUL:SC-5003948-6:INFO SYSTEM 320-199-999-5208
64.45
54.99
27.20
27.20
173.84
57426 08/19/99 003621 Q WEST L C I INTL TELEC JUL LONG DISTANCE PHONE SVCS 320-199-999-5208
30.14
30.14
57427 08/19/99 003753 QUALITY WORKERS LANDSCA COMPL.LDSCP.ON PKWY:RANCHO CAL 210-165-601-5804
57428 08/19/99 000981 R H F INC RECERTIFY RADAR SYSTEM:TEM.PD 001-170-999-5215
57428 08/19/99 000981 R H F INC REPAIR/MAINT OF RADAR EQUIP. 001-170-999-5215
57428 08/19/99 000981 R H F INC REPAIR/MAINT OF RADAR EQUIP. 001-170-999-5215
4,926.57
45.00
34.32
155.50
4,926.57
VOUCHRE2
08/19/99
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
57428
57429
57429
57429
57429
57429
57429
57429
57430
57431
08/19/99
000981 R H F INC REPAIR/MAINT OF RADAR EQUIP. 001-170-999-5215
08/19/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST AUG:O1-15-O2615-O:WINCH.RD LDS 210-165-683-5804
08/19/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST AUG:O1-OO-11000-O:MARG.RD. SP1 190-180-999-5240
08/19/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST AUG:O1-10-30510-O:MARG.RD.LDSC 210-165-683-5804
08/19/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-180-999-5240
08/19/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 191-180-999-5240
08/19/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 193-180-999-5240
08/19/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-180-999-5240
08/19/99 RIVERA, BERNICE REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900
08/19/99 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & RE JUL APERTURE CARD DUPLICATES 001-163-999-5250
57432 08/19/99 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION JUN PRGS PMT#18:R.C./I15:95-12 210-2030
57432 08/19/99 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION JUN PRGS PMT#18:R.C./I15:95-12 280-2030
57432 08/19/99 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION RET.W/H PMT#18:R.C./I15:95-12 210-2035
57432 08/19/99 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION JUN PRGS PMT#18:R.C/I15:95-12 210-2030
57432 08/19/99 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION CREDIT:BILL RETENTION ADJTMNT 210-2030
57433 08/19/99 003282 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION- RETENTION TO ESCROW ACCT 210-1035
57434 08/19/99 003764 ROSENSTEIN, RESA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330
57435 08/19/99 003479 S PARKER ENGINEERING IN JUL PRGS PMT#4:WINCH.MEDIANS 210-165-673-5804
57435 08/19/99 003479 S PARKER ENGINEERING IN JUL PRGS PMT#4:WINCH.MEDIANS 210-165-686-5804
57435 08/19/99 003479 S PARKER ENGINEERING IN RET.W/H PMT#4:WINCH. MEDIANS 210-2035
57.68
79.95
102.61
34.36
2,194.92
205.19
2,506.87
84.52
100.00
18.50
414.00
27,670.43
1,404.22-
236,697.61
236,697.61-
1,404.22
168.00
281.82
818.18
110.00-
292.50
5,208.42
100.00
18.50
26,680.21
1,404.22
168.00
990.00
57436 08/19/99 001053 SAN DIEGO ICE ARENA DAY CAMP EXCURSION:7/29/99 190-183-999-5340
435.00
435.00
57437 08/19/99 003597 SAN DIEGO PADRES TICKETS:TCSD EXCURSION:9/11/99 190-183-999-5350
57438 08/19/99 SAN DIEGO PARADISE POIN HTL:P.O.P. CF:11/13-16:~561623 001-170-999-5261
432.00
374.04
432.00
374.04
57439 08/19/99 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE RECRUITMENT AD:REC.COORDINATOR 001-150-999-5254
555.14
555.14
57440 08/19/99 000645 SMART & FINAL INC RECREATION SUPPLIES FOR TCC 190-184-999-5301
57440 08/19/99 000645 SMART & FINAL INC RECREATION SUPPLIES FOR TEEN 190-183-999-5320
71.09
60.27
131.36
57441 08/19/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG:2-17-214-0428:MEADOWS PKWY 191-180-999-5319
57441 08/19/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG:2-19-184-O511:MARGARITA TC 191-180-999-5319
57441 08/19/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG:2-O6-105-O654:VARIOUS MTRS 191-180-999-5319
57441 0~/19/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG:2-18-363-1902:PAUBA RD TC1 191-180-999-5319
57441 08/19/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG:2-19-538-2262:VARIOUS MTRS 190-180-999-5240
57441 08/19/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG:2-O9-330-3030:WINCH.RD.TC1 191-180-999-5319
57441 08/19/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG:2-O9-330-3139:WINCH.RD.TC1 191-180-999-5319
57441 08/19/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG:2-OO-397-5059:COMM SVC UTL 190-180-999-5240
57441 08/19/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG:2-15-671-5518:PALA RD TC1 191-180-999-5319
57441 08/19/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG:2-OT-626-6063:R.V.SPRINGS 193-180-999-5240
57441 08/19/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG:2-O2-351-6800:VARIOUS MTRS 191-180-999-5240
57441 08/19/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG:2-O1-202-7330:VARIOUS MTRS 192-180-999-5319
158.05
71.64
1,671.63
72.34
79.43
174.12
204.84
6,761.76
139.32
12.96
38.12
26,147.51
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/19/99 11:35 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
57441 08/19/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG:2-O1-202-7603:ARTERIAL STL 191-180-999-5319 9,483.65
57441 08/19/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG:2-10-901-7962:YUKON TCl 191-180-999-5319 154.16
57441 08/19/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG:2-OS-791-8807:VARIOUS MTRS 191-180-999-5319 4,293.27
57441 08/19/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG:2-18-O17-8972:MARG.RD.TC1 191-180-999-5319 174.56
57441 08/19/99 000537 SO CAL[F EDISON AUG:2-18-373-9903:MARGARITA 190-180-999-5240 1,984.35
57441 08/19/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG:2-18-528-9980:SANTIAGO RD 191-180-999-5319 194.52
51,816.23
57442 08/19/99 000926 SO CALIF EDISON
REPLACE ST.LIGHTS:LA SERENA 210-165-824-5804 31,296.00
31,296.00
57443 08/19/99 001212 SO CAL[F GAS COMPANY AUG:O21-725-O775-4:SR CENTER 190-181-999-5240 23.74
57443 08/19/99 001212 SO CAL[F GAS COMPANY AUG:095-167-7907-2: STN #84 001-171-999-5240 79.47
57443 08/19/99 001212 SO CAL[F GAS COMPANY AUG:lO1-525-O950-O:TCC 190-184-999-5240 16.47
57443 08/19/99 001212 SO CAL[F GAS COMPANY AUG:133-O40-7373-O:MAINT. FAC. 340-199-702-5240 17.21
57443 08/19/99 001212 SO CAL[F GAS COMPANY AUG:181-383-8881-6:MUSEUM 190-185-999-5240 38.77
175.66
57444 08/19/99 SOCIETY FOR HUMAN RESOU ANNUAL MBRSHP:LANIER/BALLANCE 001-150-999-5226 320.00 320.00
57445 08/19/99 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR AUG PEST CONTROL SVCS:CABOOSE 001-170-999-5250 29.00
57445 08/19/99 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR AUG PEST CONTROL SVCS:SR CTR 190-181-999-5250 29.00
57445 08/19/99 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR PEST CONTROL SVCS:RIVERTON PRK 190-180-999-5250 59.00
117.00
57446 08/19/99 002366 STEAM SUPERIOR CARPET C CLEAN CARPETS - CITY HALL 340-199-701-5212 1,500.00 1,500.00
57447 08/19/99 000574 SUPERTONER HP TONER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 301.85
57447 08/19/99 000574 SUPERTONER HP TONER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 1,050.56 1,352.41
57448 08/19/99 SW RIVERSIDE CO CENTRAL REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00
100.00
57449 08/19/99 003770 TECH AID TEMP HELP W/E 7/24 BRAGG 001-165-999-5118 907.20
57449 08/19/99 003770 TECH AID TEMP HELP W/E 7/31BRAGG 001-165-999-5118 907.20
1,814.40
57450 08/19/99 003665 TELCO COMMUNICATIONS GR JUL LONG DISTANCE PHONE SVCS 320-199-999-5208 1,818.66
1,818.66
57451 08/19/99 000309 TEMECULA COPIERS REPAIR COPIER @ FIRE STN 73 001-171-999-5215 75.00
75.00
57452 08/19/99 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY TROPHIES FOR SPORTS ACTIVITIES 190-183-999-5380 1,252.92
1,252.92
57453 08/19/99 000515 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER FY 99-00 FUNDING OF CHAMBER 001-111-999-5264 129,000.00 129,000.00
57454 08/19/99 TEMECULA VALLEY STARS REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00
100.00
57455 08/19/99 003140 TEMECULA VALLEY TAEKWON TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 436.80
57455 08/19/99 003140 TEMECULA VALLEY TAEKWON TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 312.00
57455 08/19/99 003140 TEMECULA VALLEY TAEKWON TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 120.00
868.80
57456 08/19/99 003149 TERRA CAL CONSTRUCTION RET.W/H PMT FOR DEBIT MEMO 210-2035 4.00-
57456 08/19/99 003149 TERRA CAL CONSTRUCTION DEBIT:BILLING ERROR:DUCK POND 210-190-143-5804 40.00
57456 08/19/99 003149 TERRA CAL CONSTRUCTION JUL PRGS PMT#9:DUCK POND:97-17 210-190-143-5804 3,200.00
57456 08/19/99 003149 TERRA CAL CONSTRUCTION RET.W/H PMT#9:DUCK POND:97-17 210-2035 320.00-
57457 08/19/99 001545 TIME MOTION TOOLS INC TMT-11-220617 FOLDING CART 320-199-999-5242 111.95
2,916.00
VOUCHRE2
08/19/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
57457
57457
57457
57457
57457
57458
57459
57459
57459
57460
57461
57461
57461
57461
57461
57461
57461
57461
57461
57462
57462
57462
57462
57462
57462
57462
57463
57463
57463
57463
57463
57463
57463
57464
57465
57466
57467
11:35
CHECK
DATE
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
08/19/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
001545
001545
001545
001545
001545
001483
000319
000319
000319
003031
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
000389
000389
000389
000389
000389
000389
000389
000325
000325
000325
000325
000325
000325
000325
001342
003756
001601
VENDOR
NAME
TIME MOTION TOOLS INC
TIME MOTION TOOLS INC
TIME MOTION TOOLS INC
TIME MOTION TOOLS INC
TIME MOTION TOOLS INC
TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES
TOMARK SPORTS INC
TOMARK SPORTS INC
TOMARK SPORTS INC
TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF, C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF, C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF, C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF, C
U S C H/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA)
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA)
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA)
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA)
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA)
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA)
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA)
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY I
WHITE HOUSE SANITATION
WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
WILSON, BRENDA
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TMT-CL160 TODL BAG
TMT-03-25102 DATA LINK TESTER
TMT-770M LINE TRACER
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
JUL PROF SVCS: REGIONAL CTR
SAF-T SLIDER BASE SETS
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
MISC. SUPPLIES:PW MAINT.CREWS
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
000325
000325
000325
000325
000325
000325
000325
CRC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
PORT.TOILET SVCS:BUTTERFIELD
PROF SVCS:TEM.CIR.ELEM.UPDATE
REFUND: TODDLER SWIM LESSONS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
320-199-999-5242
320-199-999-5242
320-199-999-5242
320-199-999-5242
320-199-999-5242
001-2620
190-183-999-5380
190-183-999-5380
190-183-999-5380
001-164-601-5218
001-2080
165-2080
190-2080
193-2080
194-2080
280-2080
300-2080
320-2080
340-2080
001-2160
165-2160
190-2160
280-2160
320-2160
330-2160
340-2160
001-2120
165-2120
190-2120
280-2120
300-2120
320-2120
330-2120
190-182-999-5212
190-180-999-5250
001-2030
190-183-4975
ITEM
AMOUNT
49.90
189.95
29.95
12.44
29.59
536.75
420.00
22.00
32.55
323.25
8,984.25
210.23
1,529.46
61.66
5.00
85.23
83.33
666.66
194.41
1,588.42
12.56
1,801.12
17.64
135.66
44.84
74.32
221.75
3.75
19.00
1.25
.25
4.00
5.00
57.54
200.00
3,000.00
25.00
PAGE 8
CHECK
AMOUNT
423.78
536.75
474.55
323.25
11,820.23
3,674.56
255.00
57.54
200.00
3,000.00
25.00
TOTAL CHECKS 364,903.87
VOUCHRE2
08/26/99
10:36
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
460 CFD 88-12 DEBT SERVICE FUND
TOTAL
AMOUNT
187,383.37
20,845.11
38,662.76
646.91
10,038.87
243.92
822~847.41
4,775.12
212.17
5,002.55
350.41
2,066.55
1,055,294.83
2,148,369.98
VOUCHRE2
08/26/99
10:36
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
55023
55023
55023
55023
55023
55023
55023
55023
55023
55023
55023
55023
55023
55023
55023
55023
55023
55023
55023
55023
55023
55023
55287
55287
55287
55287
55287
55287
55287
55287
55287
55287
55287
55287
55287
55287
55287
55287
55287
55287
57468
57468
57469
57470
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/25/99
08/20/99
08/20/99
08/20/99
08/20/99
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000395
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (]RS)
ZNSTATAX (IRS)
ZNSTATAX (IRS)
ZNSTATAX (ZRS)
INSTATAX (ZRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
ZNSTATAX (ZRS)
INSTATAX (ZRS)
ZNSTATAX (ZRS)
INSTATAX (ZRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
ZNSTATAX (IRS)
ZNSTATAX (ZRS)
INSTATAX (ZRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
XNSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
ZNSTATAX (EDD)
ZNSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
ZNSTATAX (EDD)
ZNSTATAX (EDD)
ZNSTATAX (EDD)
BRYSON, LINDA M.
BRYSON, LINDA M.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIF
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CO
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000444 SOl
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
REFUND: DISMISSED TICKET 29244
REFUND: DISMISSED TICKET 29244
DEPST CK INTENDED FOR COURTS
99-00 ECONOMIC DEVEL FUNDING
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
34O-207O
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
280-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-170-4055
001-2265
001-170-4055
001-111-999-5264
21,313.54
665.20
5,191.72
9.08
343.46
82.05
227.97
47.48
900.78
132.37
543.17
5,260.21
129.33
1,505.89
2.51
89.67
21.63
61.61
24.87
189.28
47.66
146.92
62.54
.84
117.39
1.18
9.04
3.00
4.96
5,802.44
192.56
932.82
1.59
64.39
15.88
70.87
14.76
202.87
30.58
114.03
295.00
55.00
30.00
20,000.00
36,936.40
7,641.74
350.00
30.00
20,000.00
VOUCHRE2
08/26/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
57472
57472
57473
57473
990825
57476
57477
57478
57479
57480
57480
57481
57482
57483
57484
57484
57485
57486
57487
57487
57488
57489
57490
57491
57492
57492
57493
57493
57493
57494
:C:36
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
08/20/99 001159 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE
08/20/99 001159 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE
08/20/99 000957 TEMECULA VALLEY FILM CO
08/20/99 000957 TEMECULA VALLEY FILM CO
08/25/99 003228 U S BANK TRUST NATIONAL
08/26/99 000724 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI
08/26/99 003810 A A M
08/26/99 ACCOMODEX, INC.
08/26/99 001538 ALBERT GROVER & ASSOCIA
08/26/99 003706 AMBIENT AVL INC
08/26/99 003706 AMBIENT AVL INC
08/26/99 003811 AMERICAN ASSN FOR STATE
08/26/99 002696 ANIMAL AMBASSADORS, INC
08/26/99 ANN ARBOR PRESS
08/26/99 000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
08/26/99 000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
08/26/99 BABAUTA, BEVERLY
08/26/99 003814 BALLREICH, MICHAELA
08/26/99 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER
08/26/99 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER
08/26/99 003784 BECKER ENGINEERING
08/26/99 CA-NV SECTION, AWWA
08/26/99 000502 CALIF MUNICIPAL STATIST
08/26/99 CALiFORNiA HISTORICAL S
0~,'26/99 002534 CATERERS CAFE
08/26/99 002534 CATERERS CAFE
08/26/99 000137 CHEVRON U S A INC
08/26/99 000137 CHEVRON U S A iNC
08/26/99 000137 CHEVRON U S A
08/26/99 CHRISTMAN, TIFFANY
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PROCESSING FEE:EMPLEE PRINTS
PROCESSING FEE:EMPLEE PRINTS
99-00 ECONOMIC DEVEL FUNDING
ADJUSTMENT: 99 FILM FESTIVAL
CFD 88-12 DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT
T-SHiRTS FOR 99 SOFTBALL AWARD
MEMBERSHIP:WENDELL OTT(MUSEUM)
REFD:GRADING DEPST LD97-O20GR
JUL TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING SVCS
iNSTALL OLD TWN SOUND SYSTEM
ADJUST OUTPUT LEVEL ON SPEAKER
MEMBERSHiP:WENDELL OTT(MUSEUM)
FAMILY FUN NGHT ENTERTAINMENT
SPORTS FIELD MANUAL
TEMP HELP W/E 7/24 WILLIAMS
TEMP HELP W/E 08/14 WORTHEN
REFUND: PARENT/ME SWiM LESSONS
EE COMPUTER PURCHASE PRGM
ELECTRICAL REPAIRS-POOL SiTE
ELECTRICAL REPAIRS: CRC
INSTALL DRAIN @ TEM DUCK POND
RECYCLED WTR CF:HARRINGTON:OCT
DEBT STATEMENT FOR THE CITY
1857 MAP OF CALIF FOR MUSEUM
REFRESHMENTS:PLANNING MTG
REFRESHMENTS: PLANNING MTG
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES
REFUND: PARENT/ME SWIM LESSONS
PAGE 2
ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
001-150-999-5250 126.00
190-180-999-5250 42.00 168.00
001-111-999-5264 59,000.00
001-1500 30,000.00- 29,000.00
460-1040 1,055,294.83 1,055,294.83
190-183-999-5380 885.71 885.71
190-185-999-5226 75.00 75.00
001-2670 995.00 995.00
001-164-602-5248 3~720.00 3~720.00
001-164-603-5212 60.00
001-164-603-5212 150.00 210.00
190-185-999-5226 75.00 75.00
190-183-999-5320 250.00 250.00
190-180-999-5228 79.95 79.95
280-199-999-5118 290.25
001-162-999-5118 412.80 703.05
190-183-4975 19.00 19.00
001-1175 1~961.16 1,961.16
190-180-999-5212 45.00
190-182-999-5212 59.50 104.50
210-190-143-5804 284.50 284.50
190-180-999-5261 70.00 70.00
001-140-999-5250 375.00 375.00
190-185-999-5301 18.00 18.00
001-161-999-5260 65.65
001-161-999-5260 70.00 135.65
001-164-604-5263 45.06
001-165-999-5263 17.89
190-180-999-5263 10.98 73.93
190-183-4975 25.00 25.00
VOUCHRE2
08/26/99
10:36
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
57495
57496
57496
57497
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
002147
002945
002945
003662
COMPLIMENTS COMPLAINTS
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL
CORT FURNITURE RENTAL
DEPST:CLOWN-HALLOWEEN CARNIVAL
ELECTRICAL REPAIRS: PARKS
ELECT SUPPLY: 8FT LAMP SLEEVE
FURNITURE RENTAL FOR INSPECTOR
190-183-999-5370
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
001'163'999'5238
225.00
33.40
6.79
372.00
225.00
40.19
372.00
57498
57499
57500
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
003671
002932
COVER, JEAN
CREATIVE CONTRACTORS
CROWN CARPET & DRAPERIE
REFUND: SUMMER DAY CAMP
PLAYGROUND REPAIRS:WINCH PARK
INSTALL CARPET IN RECORDS MGMT
190-183-4984
190-180-999-5416
001-120-999-5250
125.00
9,998.09
924.00
125.00
9,998.09
924.00
57501
57502
57502
57503
57503
57503
57503
57503
57503
57504
575O5
57506
57506
57506
57506
57506
57506
57506
57506
57507
57508
57508
57508
57508
57509
57510
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
0B/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
002932
001009
001009
003210
003210
003210
003210
003210
003210
003758
003006
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
000165
000165
000165
000165
000166
001135
CROWN CARPET & DRAPERIE
D B X INC
D B X INC
DALLAS MIDWEST
DALLAS MIDWEST
DALLAS MIDWEST
DALLAS MIDWEST
DALLAS MIDWEST
DALLAS MIDWEST
DESMOND, LISA
DEWITT CUSTOM PAINTING
E S
E S
ES
ES
ES
E S
ES
ES
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
ELKINS, TAMMY
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M
CARPET FOR 2nd FLOOR MNTC BLDG
REL RETENTION: PRJT PW97-29
RETENTION FOR INV 02-RC/VIA LS
50 FOLDING CHAIRS
200 FOLDING CHAIRS
FREIGHT
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
SALES TAX
FACADE IMPR PRGM:MAIN ST SALON
RESIDENTIAL IMPROV: F&R LOPEZ
TEMP HELP W/E 08/13 WILLIAMS
TEMP HELP W/E 08/13 GORMAN
TEMP HELP W/E 08/13 MILES
TEMP HELP W/E 08/13 MILES
TEMP HELP W/E 08/13 NILES
TEMP HELP W/E 08/13 THORNSLEY
TEMP HELP W/E 08/13 DEGANGE
TEMP HELP W/E 08/13 HILLBERG
REFUND: PICNIC SHELTER DEPOSIT
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
LOT BK REPT:27080 FALLING CRK
PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
210-190-158-5804
210-2035
210-2035
340-199-702-5610
190-184-999-5242
190-184-999-5242
340-199-702-5610
190-184-999-5242
340-199-702-5610
280-199-813-5804
165-199-813-5804
001-162-999-5118
001-162-999-5118
001-163-999-5118
001-164-604-5118
001-165-999-5118
001-161-999-5118
001-161-999-5118
165-199-999-5118
190-2900
001-164-604-5230
001-163-999-5230
001-165-999-5230
001-162-999-5230
165-199-813-5804
001-150-999-5250
9,845.40
7,581.38
807.17'
497.50
1,990.00
437.86
85.27
150.94
29.40
1,769.00
1,300.00
1,103.52
1,890.33
324.53
324.53
324.54
1,888.56
2,608.29
822.40
100.00
11.00
21.75
48.25
33.50
150.00
535.00
9,845.40
6,7'/4.21
3,190.97
1,769.00
1,300.00
9,286.70
100.00
114.50
150.00
535.00
57511 08/26/99 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 197-0073 GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 2,006.06
57511 08/26/99 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 197-0074 GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 255.47
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/26/99 ,3;36 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
57511 08/26/99 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 695-356/+ ALARM
320-199-999-5208 54.58 2m316.11
57512 08/26/99 002819 GARWIN & CHAN ASSOCIATE MAXELL IS-90/INSTANT START 001-161-999-5220 11.90
57512 08/26/99 002819 GARWIN & CHAN ASSOCIATE FREIGHT 001~161-999-5220 4.80
57512 08/26/99 002819 GARWIN & CHAN ASSOCIATE SALES TAX 001-161-999-5220 .92
17.62
57513 08/26/99 003794 GEORGE T HALL COMPANY I GIANT SUMP PUMP-TEM DUCK POND 190-180-999-5212 272.50
57513 08/26/99 003794 GEORGE T HALL COMPANY I FREIGHT 190-180-999-5212 11.68
57513 08/26/99 003794 GEORGE T HALL COMPANY I SALES TAX 190-180-999-5212 20.60
304.78
57514 08/26/99 002528 GLASS BLASTERS CITY MUGS FOR NEW HIRES 001-150-999-5265 34.48
34.48
57515 08/26/99 000175 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFI PUB:"GUIDE TO PREPARING RFP" 001-140-999-5261
55.00
55.00
57516 08/26/99 002174 GROUP 1 PRODUCTIONS DWNTWN REDEVEL VIDEO:OLD TWN 280-199-999-5250 2,000.00
2,000.00
57517 08/26/99 001517 HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCE EMPLOYEES STRESS MGMT TRAINING 001-150-999-5261 900.00
900.00
57518 08/26/99 001351 INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC 99-00 ECONOMIC DEVEL FUNDING 001-111-999-5264 11m637.50
11,637.50
57519 08/26/99 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL CRC POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS 190-182-999-5250 177.79
177.79
57520 08/26/99 000388 INTL CONFERENCE BLDG OF 96 NAT'L ELECT CODE CF:9/01/99 001-162-999-5261 180.00
180.00
57521 08/26/99 000203 JOBS AVAILABLE INC RECRUITMENT AD:RECREATION COOR 001-150-999-5254
92.00
92.00
57522 08/26/99 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES JULY CONSULTANT SVCS:PLAN CKS 001-163-999-5248
1,820.00
1,820.00
57523 08/26/99 002789 KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION TEMP HELP W/E 06/13 COOK 001-120-999-5118 291.20
57523 08/26/99 002789 KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION TEMP HELP W/E 07/25 MUELLER 001-120-999-5118 280.80
572.00
57524 08/26/99 003428 M V P TEMECULA SHUTTLE SHTL:LEAGUE CF:HM/JM:8/04/99 190-180-999-5260
57524 08/26/99 003428 M V P TEMECULA SHUTTLE SHTL:LEAGUE CF:HM/JM:8/4-6/99 190-180-999-5260
77.05
77.05
154.10
57525 08/26/99 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 7/11BELIAN 001-171-999-5118 371.52
57525 08/26/99 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 7/11BROMMET 001-150-999-5118 348.30
719.82
57526 08/26/99 002664 MAR CO INDUSTRIES INC SCRUB BRUSHES FOR FACTORY CAT 190-180-999-5215 184.62
57526 08/26/99 002664 MAR CO INDUSTRIES INC FREIGHT 190-180-999-5215 6.84
57526 08/26/99 002664 MAR CO INDUSTRIES INC SALES TAX 190-180-999-5215 14.31
205.77
57527 08/26/99 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS [NC IMPRINTS ON CIP/AOB COVERS 001-140-999-5222 145.46
145.46
57528 08/26/99 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUSINESS CARDS:S.NELSON 001-110-999-5222 206.20
57528 08/26/99 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001-110-999-5222 15.98
57528 08/26/99 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUSINESS CARDS:M.WIECHEC 190-180-999-5222 38.25
57528 08/26/99 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 190-180-999-5222 2.96
57528 08/26/99 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUSINESS CARDS:R.SERVEN 190-180-999-5222 38.25
57528 08/26/99 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 190-180-999-5222 2.96
304.60
57529 08/26/99 003790 MOCKINGBIRD NURSERIES I DEPOSIT:LDSC MATERIALS:PALA BR 210-165-631-5804 956.28 956.28
VOUCHRE2
08/26/99
10:36
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
57530
57531
57532
57533
57533
57534
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
001986
000233
001599
001599
003755
MUSICAL AUDIO ENVIRONM
NATIONAL CREDIT AUDIT C
NELSON, SHAWN
NORTH COUNTY BASKETBALL
NORTH COUNTY BASKETBALL
OGLEBAY NORTON INDUSTRI
AUG MUSIC BROADCAST:OLD TOWN
ANN'L SUB:FIREHOUSE MAG:STN#12
RB:BUS.CALLS ON PERSONAL PHONE
JUL BASKETBALL OFFICIAL SVCS
JUL BASKETBALL FORFEIT SVCS
FREIGHT CHRGS FOR INV# 90654
001-164-603-5250
001-171-999-5228
001-110-999-5208
190-183-999-5380
190-183-999-5380
190-180-999-5416
59.50
27.97
147.03
114.00
40.00
467.50
59.50
27.97
147.03
154.00
467.50
57535
57535
57535
57535
57536
57536
57537
57537
57537
57537
57537
57537
57537
57537
57537
57537
57537
57537
57537
57537
57537
57537
57537
57537
57537
57537
57537
57537
57537
57537
57537
57537
57537
57538
57538
57538
57538
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
002105
002105
002105
002105
002406
002406
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000253
000253
000253
000253
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
PACIFIC BUSINESS INTERI
PACIFIC BUSINESS INTERI
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EHPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EHPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
MAR-MAY DESIGN SVCS:CITY HALL
APR-JUN DESIGN SVCS:CITY HALL
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS-PRE
000246 PERS-PRE
000246 PERS-PRE
000246 PERS-PRE
000246 PERS-PRE
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
EXPRESS MAil & POSTAL SERVS
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
190-180-999-5214
190-180-999-5214
001-163-999-5214
001-163-999-5214
210-190-158-5802
210-190-158-5802
001-2390
165-2390
190-2390
191-2390
193-2390
194-2390
280-2390
300-2390
320-2390
330-2390
340-2390
001-2130
190-2130
191-2130
193-2130
194-2130
001-2390
165-2390
190-2390
191-2390
193-2390
194-2390
280-2390
300-2390
320-2390
330-2390
340-2390
001-165-999-5230
001-161-999-5230
001-120-999-5230
001-140-999-5230
72.37
25.95
351.49
219.47
747.50
520.00
25,182.30
678.42
4,092.29
12.71
429.07
115.52
293.48
124.60
658.32
135.87
504.97
100.64
11.24
2.81
33.71
8.43
86.82
1.87
15.78
.05
1.81
.41
.92
.46
1.86
.93
2.18
23.50
15.75
35.75
11.75
669.28
1,267.50
32,497.47
86.75
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/26/99 10:36 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
57539 08/26/99 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN JUL RECRUIT ADS:ENG/PLN/REC/FC 001-150-999-5254
57539 08/26/99 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: PA98-0481 001-161-999-5256
1,263.06
22.25
1,285.31
57540 08/26/99 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT TRAFFIC LINE REMOVER 001-164-601-5610
57540 08/26/99 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT SALES TAX 001-164-601-5610
57540 08/26/99 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT RENTAL:PW MAINT.CREW 001-164-601-5238
57541 08/26/99 003762 PROMEDIX.COM SUPPLIES FOR CITY MEDIC SQUAD 001-171-999-5242
57541 08/26/99 003762 PROMEDIX.COM SUPPLIES FOR CITY MEDIC SQUAD 001-171-999-5242
57541 08/26/99 003762 PROMEDIX.COM SUPPLIES FOR CITY MEDIC SQUAD 001-171-999-5242
57541 08/26/99 003762 PROMEDIX.COM SUPPLIES FOR CITY MEDIC SQUAD 001-171-999-5242
57542 08/26/99 003687 QUEST ENVIRONMENTAL REMOVE HAZ-MAT:OLD TWN PRJT 001-164-601-5430
57543 08/26/99 QUINLAN PUBLISHING GROU ANN'L SUB:ZONING BULLETIN:PLAN 001-161-999-5228
4,500.00
348.75
589.64
8,829.61
805.72
214.44
2,736.04
1,388.00
89.00
5°438.39
12,585.81
1,388.00
89.00
57544 08/26/99 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF (3) STAMPS:"READ THIS NOTICE" 001-2030
57544 08/26/99 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF EMPLOYEE NAME BADGE 190-180-999-5222
57544 08/26/99 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF LETTERING FOR OFFICE 190-180-999-5222
57544 08/26/99 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF LETTERING FOR OFFICE 190-180-999-5222
57544 08/26/99 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF SALES TAX 190-180-999-5222
216.58
4.50
30.OO
15.00
3.84
269.92
57545 08/26/99 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINT REPROD:WINCH/YNEZ RD 210-165-683-5804
57545 08/26/99 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINT REPRO:BUTTERFIELD PK 210-190-164-5804
57545 08/26/99 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINT REPRO:IST ST BRIDGE 280-199-807-5804
57545 08/26/99 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINT REPRO:R.C. OFF-RAMP 210-165-605-5804
57545 08/26/99 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINT REPRO:RC/I15 IMPROVE 210-165-605-5804
57545 08/26/99 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINT REPRO:PW ADMIN. 001-164-604-5268
57545 08/26/99 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINT REPRO:PALA RD/RNBW 210-165-631-5804
57545 08/26/99 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINT REPRO:WINCH RD:98-07 210-165-697-5804
57545 08/26/99 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINT REPRO:WINCH RD:98-07 210-165-697-5804
57545 08/26/99 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINT REPRO:RC/I15 IMPROVE 210-165-605-5804
57546 08/26/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST AUG:OI-IO-306OI-I:NICOLAS RD 193-180-999-5240
57546 08/26/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-180-999-5240
57546 08/26/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 191-180-999-5240
57546 08/26/99 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS 193-180-999-5240
57547 08/26/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 001-162-999-5214
57547 08/26/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING 001-165-999-5214
57547 08/26/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 001-110-999-5214
57547 08/26/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 001-110-999-5263
57547 08/26/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING 001-163-999-5214
57547 08/26/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 001-161-999-5214
57547 08/26/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 001-161-999-5263
57547 08/26/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING 001-164-604-5214
57547 08/26/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-164-604-5263
57547 08/26/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 190-180-999-5214
57547 08/26/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 190-180-999-5263
57548 08/26/99 000266 RIGHTWAY SEP RENTAL SVCS:RIVERTON PARK 190-180-999-5238
11.22
168.25
59.84
347.63
500.00
33.65
24.73
500.00
126.46
500.00
61.34
4,366.33
79.14
9,015.42
49.25
30.00
12.00
19.88
30.00
7.00
10.25
6.00
19.82
39.00
14.26
62.89
2,271.78
13,522.23
237.46
62.89
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/26/99 10:36 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
57549 08/26/99 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & RE DIF NTC SATISFACTION REC. FEE 001-100-999-5250
10.00
10.00
57550 08/26/99 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION JUL PRGS PMT#S:MARG/OVRLD:9707 210-165-681-5804 647,645.35
57550 08/26/99 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION JUL C/O PMT~5:MARG/OVRLD:97-07 210-165-681-5804 116,889.12
57550 08/26/99 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION RET.W/H PMT#5:MARG/OVRLD:97-07 210-2035 76,453.44-
57550 08/26/99 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION JUL PRGS PMT#5:WINCH/YNEZ:9706 210-165-683-5804 74,019.19
57550 08/26/99 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION JUL PRGS PMT#5:WINCH/YNEZ:9706 210-165-683-5804 25,078.64
57550 08/26/99 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION JUL C/O PMT#5:WINCH/YNEZ:97-06 210-165-683-5804 26,174.62
57550 08/26/99 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION RET.W/H PMT#5:WXNCH/YNEZ:97-06 210-2035 12,527.25-
800,826.23
57551 08/26/99 003001 ROSS FENCE COMPANY RES.IMPROVEMENT PRG:R.CUSUMANO 165-199-813-5804 2,147.00
2,147,00
57552 08/26/99 00027/S & S ARTS & CRAFTS INC MISC. SUPPLIES:DAY CAMP 190-183-999-5340 60.18
60.18
57553 08/26/99 003805 SHAFER, ALICIA JOY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
190-183-999-5330 672.00 672.00
57554 08/26/99 002505 SIGNS & LUCITE PRODUCTS CITY HALL SIGNS FOR STAIRS 340-199-701-5212 128.00
57554 08/26/99 002505 SIGNS & LUCITE PRODUCTS SALES TAX 340-199-701-5212 10.15
138.15
57555 08/26/99 003548 SKY CANYON ENTERPRISES SEP HANGAR RENT:MUS.ARTIFACTS 190-185-999-5250 747.00
747.00
57556 08/26/99 000645 SMART & FINAL INC SUPPLIES FOR MOBILE RECREATION 190-180-999-5301 33.11
33.11
57557 08/26/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG:2-19-525-2143:RNBW CYN TC1 191-180-999-5319 105.49
57557 08/26/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON. AUG:2-13-O79-2377:HWY 79 TCl 191-180-999-5319 189.64
57557 08/26/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG:2-19-111-4834:BEDFORD CT 191-180-999-5319 82.96
57557 08/26/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUG:2-18-348-6315:MARG.RD.TC1 191-180-999-5319 160.93
539.02
57558 08/26/99 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY AUG:O91-O24-9300-5:CRC
190-182-999-5240 670.37 670.37
57559 08/26/99 003467 SPECTRUM POOL PRODUCTS ADA STEPS FOR TES POOL 190-180-999-5301 1,511.25
57559 08/26/99 003467 SPECTRUM PODL PRODUCTS FREIGHT 190-180-999-5301 172.32
57560 08/26/99 002015 STAR WAY PRODUCTIONS SOUND TECH:SUMMER CONCERT:7/18 190-183-999-5320 500.00
57560 08/26/99 002015 STAR WAY PRODUCTIONS SOUND TECH:SUMMER CONCERT:8/15 190-183-999-5320 450.00
57560 08/26/99 002015 STAR WAY PRODUCTIONS SOUND TECH:JON LASKIN BAND 190-183-999-5320 500.00
57561 08/26/99 002366 STEAM SUPERIOR CARPET C CARPET CLEANING SVCS:SR CENTER 190-181-999-5212 80.00
57562 08/26/99 000574 SUPERTONER AUG LASER PRINTER MAINTENANCE 320-199-999-5215 625.00
57563 08/26/99 003599 T Y LIN INTERNATIONAL JUL FOUND.REDESIGN:OVRLND:9511 210-165-604-5801 715.00
57564 08/26/99 000305 TARGET STORE SUPPLIES FOR MOBILE RECREATION 190-180-999-5301 22.78
57564 08/26/99 000305 TARGET STORE MISC. RECREATION SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5301 140.19
57564 08/26/99 000305 TARGET STORE RECREATION SUPPLIES:DAY CAMP 190-183-999-5340 44.13
57564 08/26/99 000305 TARGET STORE SUPPLIES FOR MOBILE RECREATION 190-180-999-5301 43.58
57565 08/26/99 003626 TEMECULA GARDENS LP SECURITY DEPST:RENT PRORATIONS 165-2285 8,394.00
57565 08/26/99 003626 TEMECULA GARDENS LP SECURITY DEPST:RENT PRORATIONS 165-2030 7,216.95
1,683.57
1,450.00
80.00
625.00
715.00
250.68
14,757.49
VOUCHRE2
08/26/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
57566
57567
57567
57567
57567
57567
57567
57568
57569
57570
57570
57571
57571
10:36
CHECK
DATE
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
08/26/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
003140
001545
001545
001545
001545
001545
001545
000332
001881
001881
002092
002092
VENDOR
NAME
TEMECULA VALLEY TAEKWON
TIME MOTION TOOLS INC
TIME MOTION TOOLS INC
TIME MOTION TOOLS INC
TIME MOTION TOOLS INC
TIME MOTION TOOLS ]NC
TIME MOTION TOOLS ]NC
TITAN ENGINEERING, INC.
VANDORPE CNOU ASSOCIATE
WATER SAFETY PRODUCTS I
WATER SAFETY PRODUCTS I
WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH
WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TMT-B8176 110 BLADE
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
REVERSIBLE PHILLIP SCREWDRIVER
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
JUL PLAN CHECK SERVICES
BASIC HIP PAK W/LIFEGUARD LOGO
FREIGHT
BANNER DESIGN
SALES TAX
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-183-999-5330
320-199-999-5242
320-199-999-5242
320-199-999-5242
320-199-999-5242
320-199-999-5242
320-199-999-5242
190-2900
001-162-999-5248
190-183-999-5310
190-183-999-5310
001-111-999-5271
001-111-999-5271
ITEM
AMOUNT
80.00
41.00
3.93
3.18
43.80
3.99
3.39
100.00
22,782.44
60.00
6.00
450.00
34.87
PAGE 8
CHECK
AMOUNT
80.00
99.29
100.00
22,782.44
66.00
484.87
TOTAL CHECKS
2,148,369.98
VOUCHRE2
09/02/99
16:43
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 13
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
261 CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
470 CFD 98-1 DEBT SERVICE FUND
471 CFD 98-1ADMIN EXPENSE FUND
AMOUNT
135,546.10
21,349.09
44,333.37
593.73
2,062.26
323.76
16,055.98
500,00
7,719.85
363.97
12,413.47
3,989.40
10,380.55
445,802.00
459.00
TOTAL 701,892.53
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
09/02/99 16:43 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
36433 09/08/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL
36433 09/08/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL
36433 09/08/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL
36433 09/08/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL
36433 09/08/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL
36433 09/08/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL
36433 09/08/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL
36433 09/08/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL
36433 09/08/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL
36433 09/08/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL
36433 09/08/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL
36433 09/08/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE
36433 09/08/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE
36433 09/08/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE
36433 09/08/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE
36433 09/08/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE
36433 09/08/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE
36433 09/08/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE
36433 09/08/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE
36433 09/08/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE
36433 09/08/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE
36433 09/08/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE
36723 09/08/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI
36723 09/08/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI
36723 09/08/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI
36723 09/08/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI
36723 09/08/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI
36723 09/08/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI
36723 09/08/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI
36723 09/08/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE
36723 09/08/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE
36723' 09/08/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE
36723 09/08/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE
36723 09/08/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE
36723 09/08/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE
36723 09/08/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE
36723 09/08/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE
36723 09/08/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE
36723 09/08/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE
36723 09/08/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE
57572 08/30/99 000869 LAWRENCE WELK RESORT TH
EXCURSION - WELK'S THEATRE
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
280-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
190-183-999-5350
22,326.20
661.99
4,763.67
9.08
338.01
82.05
245.13
47.47
756.63
128.39
425.38
5,451.25
135.61
1,403.74
2.50
88.31
21.64
62.28
24.87
161.28
49.74
126.50
59.97
.79
97.96
.19
4.22
3.56
4.59
6,154.34
191.64
905.20
1.59
62.85
15.88
72.78
14.76
174.05
28.21
81.39
225.60
37,311.72
7,873.97
225.60
57573 08/30/99 002998 BRUNSWICK CAL OAKS BOWL DAY CAMP EXCURSION: CRC
190-183-999-5340
157.50
157.50
57574 08/30/99 003626 TEMECULA GARDENS LP
57574 08/30/99 003626 TEMECULA GARDENS LP
57574 08/30/99 003626 TEMECULA GARDENS LP
990827 08/27/99 003228
U S BANK TRUST NATIONAL
SECURITY DEPST:RENT PRORATIONS
SECURITY DEPST:RENT PRORATIONS
PMT OF INV# 1494A
CFD 98-1 DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT
165~2285
165-2030
165-1270
470-1040
8,394.00
7,216.95
853.46-
445,802.00
14,757.49
445,802.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
09/02/99 16:43 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
57577 09/02/99 003552 A F L A C 003552 CANCER 001-2330
57577 09/02/99 003552 A F I A C 003552 EXP PROT 001-2330
57577 09/02/99 003552 A F L A C 003552 EXP PROT 190-2330
57577 09/02/99 003552 A F L A C 003552 EXP PROT 300-2330
57577 09/02/99 003552 A F L A C 003552 HOSP IC 001-2330
57577 09/02/99 003552 A F L A C 003552 STD 001-2330
57577 09/02/99 003552 A F L A C 003552 STD 190-2330
57577 09/02/99 003552 A F L A C 003552 STD 300-2330
234.50
189.23
55.80
5.47
17.50
670.40
112.00
8.00
1,292.90
57578 09/02/99 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 001-2310
57578 09/02/99 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 190-2310
57578 09/02/99 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 340-2310
57578 09/02/99 000116 A V P VISION PLANS COBRA SEPT 99 GREEK 001-1180
624.53
29.75
18.58
18.58
691.44
57579 09/02/99 002278 ABC SEWING & VACUUM REPAIRS TO STATION#84 VACUUM 001-171-999-5250
56.36
56.36
57580 09/02/99 ADAMS, AARON
REIMB:EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP CF 001-110-999-5261
243.38
243.38
57581 09/02/99 003802 ADOLF KIEFER & ASSOCIAT LIFEGUARD PROFILE SHORT 190-183-999-5310
57581 09/02/99 003802 ADOLF KIEFER & ASSOCIAT LIFEGUARD T-SHIRTS 190-183-999-5310
57581 09/02/99 003802 ADOLF KIEFER & ASSOCIAT FOX 40 CLASSIC WHISTLE 190-183-999-5310
57581 09/02/99 003802 ADOLF KIEFER & ASSOCIAT NYLON LANYARD 190-183-999-5310
57581 09/02/99 003802 ADOLF KIEFER & ASSOCIAT FREIGHT 190-183-999-5310
264.00
529.00
105.00
25.50
18.52
942.02
57582 09/02/99 001916 ALBERT A WEBB ASSOCIATE 97-98 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION 210-2030
57582 09/02/99 001916 ALBERT A WEBB ASSOCIATE JULY CONSULTING SVCS:CFD 88-12 261-199-999-5250
57582 09/02/99 001916 ALBERT A WEBB ASSOCIATE JULY CONSULTING SVCS:CFD 98-1 471-199-999-5250
4,685.19
500.00
459.00
5,644.19
57583 09/02/99 003688 ALTIMA SOLUTIONS HP LASERJET 8500N PRINTER 320-1970
57583 09/02/99 003688 ALTIMA SOLUTIONS FREIGHT 320-1970
57583 09/02/99 003688 ALTIMA SOLUTIONS SALES TAX 320-1970
6,250.00
95.00
484.38
6,829.38
57584 09/02/99 003789 AMERICAN BUSINESS FORMS CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY
57584 09/02/99 003789 AMERICAN BUSINESS FORMS SALES TAX
001-162-999-5222
001-162-999-5222
200.20
15.52
215.72
57585 09/02/99 000110 AMERICAN BUSINESS SYSTE (4) POSTAGE METER TAPES
57585 09/02/99 000110 AMERICAN BUSINESS SYSTE FREIGHT
57585 09/02/99 000110 AMERICAN BUSINESS SYSTE SALES TAX
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
52.00
5.~
4.03
61.76
57586 09/02/99 000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
57586 09/02/99 000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
TEMP HELP W/E 08/14 KLOHE
TEMP HELP W/E 08/21WORTHEN
001-140-999-5118
001-162-999-5118
52.00
304.44
356.44
57587 09/02/99 003763 APPRAISALS ASAP
APPRAISAL FOR 41880 SIXTH ST. 165-199-999-5250
300.00
300.00
57588 09/02/99 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER INC
57588 09/02/99 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER INC
57588 09/02/99 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER INC
BOTTLED WATER SVCS: MNTC FAC
BOTTLED WATER SVCS: CRC
BOTTLED WATER SVCS: CITY HALL
340-199-701-5250
190-182-999-5250
340-199-701-5250
101.07
47.80
316.16
465.03
57589 09/02/99 002648
57589 09/02/99 002648
57589 09/02/99 002648
AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C
AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C
AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP: S.NELSON
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP: B.McKEON
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP: R.SERVEN
001-110-999-5214
001-162-999-5214
190-180-999-5214
53.00
53.00
53.00
VOUCHRE2
09/02/99
16:43
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
57589
57589
57590
57591
57591
57591
57592
57593
57594
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
002648
002648
000122
000622
000622
000622
002541
003788
AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C
AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C
B S N SPORTS
BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER
BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER
BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER
BECKER, WALTER KARL
BECKHAM, BARBARA
BERCK'S OLD TIME PLUMBI
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP: M.MUNOZ
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP: K.CUMMINGS
TEEN/GAME AREA EQUIPMENT
DEDICATED POWER TO REFRIGERATR
ELECTRICAL REPAIRS:CITY HALL
CONNECT VIDEO ROOM ELECT PANEL
R&R SIDEWALK DRAIN:CALLE KATHR
REFUND: HATHA YOGA
RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEMENT: KAZEN
190-180-999-5214
001-171-999-5214
190-182-999-5301
001-171-999-5212
340-199-701-5212
320-199-999-5250
001-164-601-5402
190-183-4982
165-199-813-5804
53.00
53.00
67.06
385.00
175.00
1,530.00
3,000.00
30.00
300.00
265.00
67.06
2,090.00
3,000.00
30.00
300.00
57595
57596
57597
57598
57598
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
002377
001006
BEST BUY COMPANY INC
BOLDUC, SUSAN
BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS
C & N ENTERPRISES
C & N ENTERPRISES
EE COMPUTER PRGM: MARIO MUNOZ
REFUND: TODDLER SWIM LESSONS
SVC CONTRACT:READER & PRINTER
HOLSTER FOR STALKER RADAR
TAX
001-1175
190-183-4975
330-199-999-5217
001-170-999-5242
001-170-999-5242
1,799.93
20,00
2,825.64
95.00
7.36
1,799.93
20.00
2,825.64
102.36
57599
57599
57599
57599
57599
57599
57599
57599
57599
57599
57599
57599
57599
57599
57599
57599
57599
57599
57599
57599
57599
57599
57601
57601
57601
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003769
003769
003769
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
CAL OLYMPIC SAFETY
CAL OLYMPIC SAFETY
CAL OLYMPIC SAFETY
003553 LTD
003553 LTD
003553 LTD
003553 LTD
003553 LTD
003553 LTD
003553 LTD
003553 LTD
003553 LTD
003553 LTD
003553 LTD
003553 STD
003553 STD
003553 STD
003553 STD
003553 STD
003553 STD
003553 STD
003553 STD
003553 STD
003553 STD
003553 STD
4 STAR SHORT JACKET/FLUORESCNT
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
001-2380
165-2380
190-2380
191-2380
193-2380
194-2380
280-2380
300-2380
320-2380
330-2380
340-2380
001-2500
165-2500
190-2500
191-2500
193-2500
194-2500
280-2500
300-2500
320-2500
330-2500
340-2500
001-164-601-5243
001-164-601-5243
001-164-601-5243
1,357.88
37.20
229.37
,75
25.85
6.63
16.41
7.12
37.35
8.08
28.62
1,895.38
51.94
320.17
1.05
36.07
9.25
22.90
9.94
52.14
11.28
39.95
179.90
5.81
13.94
4,205.33
199.65
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
09/02/99 16:43 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAHE DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
57602 09/02/99 000413 CALIF DEPT OF FISH & GA PERMIT FEE:IST ST BRIDGE:95-08 280-199-807-5801 1,191.00
1,191.00
57603 09/02/99 CALIF FAMILY LIFE CENTE REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900
57603 09/02/99 CALIF FAMILY LIFE CENTE REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900
100.00
100.00
200.00
57604 09/02/99 003629 CALTROP ENGINEERING COR AUG PROF SVCS:PALA BRIDGE:9715 210-165-631-5801 2,494.00
2,494.00
57605 09/02/99 003554 CANADA LiFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 001-2360 583.38
57605 09/02/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 165-2360 13.01
57605 09/02/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 190-2360 110.34
57605 09/02/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 191-2360 .33
57605 09/02/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 193-2360 12.52
57605 09/02/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 194-2360 2.92
57605 09/02/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 280-2360 6.49
57605 09/02/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 300-2360 3.24
57605 09/02/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 320-2360 13.00
57605 09/02/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 330-2360 6.50
57605 09/02/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 340-2360 15.27
767.00
57606 09/02/99 002534 CATERERS CAFE REFRESHMENTS FOR STAFF MTG 001-162-999-5261 90.91
57606 09/02/99 002534 CATERERS CAFE PROFESSIONAL MTG REFRESHMENTS 001-161-999-5260 10.20
101.11
57607 09/02/99 002989 CLEAR IMAGE W%NDOW CLEA CLEAN FRONT CANOPY @ CITY HALL 340-199-701-5250 45.00
45.00
57608 09/02/99 001193 COMP U S A INC VARIOUS COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 698.80
698.80
57609 09/02/99 002571 CONCHOLA, BARBARA 09/24 DJ SVCS AT SR. CENTER 190-181-999-5301 100.00
100.00
57610 09/02/99 001014 COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS 3 OLD TWN PUBLIC PRKING SIGNS 280-199-999-5362 1,631.37
1,631.37
57611 09/02/99 002631 COUNTS UNLIMITED INC TRAFFIC COUNT CENSUS: VARIOUS 001-164-602-5250 4,280.00
57612 09/02/99 CRONK, MARION REFUND: CALLIGRAPHY 190-183-4982 68.00
4,280.00
68.00
57613 09/02/99 001233 DANS FEED & SEED INC PROPANE GAS FOR PW MAINTENANCE 001-164-601-5218
15.48
15.48
57614 09/02/99 003006 DEWlTT CUSTOM PAINTING RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEMENT:HELLER 165-199-813-5804 1,200.00
57615 09/02/99 002954 DIAMOND GARAGE DOOR INC RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEMENT: SALAS 165-199-813-5804 1,000.00
57616 09/02/99 003699 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY FRUIT PUNCH SQWINCHER:FAST PAC 190-180-999-5250 47.30
57616 09/02/99 003699 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY FREIGHT 190-180-999-5250 9.47
1,200.00
1,000.00
56.77
57617 09/02/99 003754 DOWNTOWN PROMOTION REPO ONE YEAR SUBSCRIPTION 280-199-999-5228 129.00
129.00
57618 09/02/99 DUVALL, MICHELE REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00
100.00
57619 09/02/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 08/13 MENDOZA 330-199-999-5118 541.45
57619 09/02/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 08/13 MENDOZA 340-199-701-5118 309.40
57619 09/02/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 08/13 MENDOZA 340-199-702-5118 132.60
983.45
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
09/02/99 16:43 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
57620 09/02/99 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER AUG PRGS PMT:OVRLND SEWER RELO 210-165-604-5804
1,180.82
1,180.82
57621 09/02/99 002060 EUROPEAN DELI& CATERIN LUNCH FOR PROF MTG @ MUSEUM 190-180-999-5260
101.82
101.82
57622 09/02/99 002037 EXPANETS COMPUTER EQUIP REPAIRS 320'199'999-5215
57622 09/02/99 002037 EXPANETS COMPUTER EQUIP REPAIRS 320-199-999-5215
48.00
48.00
96.00
57623 09/02/99 000478 FAST SIGNS
57623 09/02/99 000478 FAST SIGNS
TEM VLLY MUSEUM:OCCUPANCY SIGN 190-185-999-5250
SALES TAX 190-185-999-5250
46.00
3.57
49.57
57624 09/02/99 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS INC WEB DESIGN CONSULTING SVCS 320-199-999-5248
826.50
826.50
57625 09/02/99 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 506-6506 JEFF STONE
57625 09/02/99 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 676-3526 FIRE ALARM
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
25.07
81.45
106.52
57626 09/02/99 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES-LOW/HOD & RDA 165-199-999-5220
57626 09/02/99 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES-LOW/HOD & RDA 280-199-999-5220
57626 09/02/99 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES-LOW/MOD & RDA 165-199-999-5220
57626 09/02/99 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES-LO~/MOD & RDA 280-199-999-5220
125.00
125.00
76.61
76.62
403.23
57627 09/02/99 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY I ALARM MONITORING @ STOREFRONT 001-170-999-5229
55.50
55.50
57628 09/02/99 002174 GROUP 1 PRODUCTIONS MOBILE RECREATION PRGM VIDEO 190-180-999-5254
800.00
800.00
57629 09/~12/99 GUTIERREZ, MARIA REFUND:SPECIAL EVENT INSURANCE 300-2180
87.18
87.18
57630 09/02/99 001517 HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCE EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 001-150-999-5248
427.05
427.05
57631 09/02/99 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VL REVER 001-2510
57631 09/02/99 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510
57631 09/02/99 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510
57631 09/02/99 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 193-2510
57631 09/02/99 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 194-2510
57631 09/02/99 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510
57631 09/02/99 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VL ADVAN 001-2510
57631 09/02/99 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510
57631 09/02/99 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510
57631 09/02/99 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 193-2510
57631 09/02/99 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 194-2510
57631 09/02/99 002107 HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510
212.45-
193.75
11.37
2.22
.74
4.37
218.25
199.55
11.37
2.22
.74
4.37
436.50
57632 09/02/99 001013 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & 3RD QTR SALES TAX CONSULT SVCS 001-140-999-5248
57632 09/02/99 001013 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & SALES TAX FINDER FEES 001-140-999-5248
57633 09/02/99 HOAGLAND, JOHN REFUND: HATHA YOGA 190-183-4982
900.00
755.53
121.00
1,655.53
121.00
57634 09/02/99 HULING, HARRIET REFUND:EXCURSION-PADRES 190-183-4986
42.00
42.00
57635 09/02/99 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 001-2080 1,796.90
57635 09/02/99 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 165-2080 250.00
57635 09/02/99 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 190-2080 246.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
09/02/99 16:43 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
57635 09/02/99 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 193-2080 30.00
57635 09/02/99 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 280-2080 100.13
57636 09/02/99 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL CRC POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS 190-182-999-5250
213.35
2,423.03
213.35
57637 09/02/99
INTERLAKE MATERIAL HAND REFUND:OVRPMT OF FEES B99-2069 001-2660
257.50
257.50
57638 09/02/99 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN 001-2140 298.42 298.42
57639 09/02/99 001186 IRWIN, JOHN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330
57640 09/02/99 002695 J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN PLAN CHECK SVCS: VARIOUS PLANS 001-162-999-5248
57640 09/02/99 002695 J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN PLAN CHECK SVCS: VARIOiJS PLANS 001-162-999-5248
57640 09/02/99 002695 J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN PLAN CHECK SVCS: B99-2170 001-162-999-5248
57640 09/02/99 002695 J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN PLAN CHECK SVCS: VARIOUS PLANS 001-162-999-5248
57640 09/02/99 002695 J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN PLAN CHECK SVCS: B99-2337/2219 001-162-999-5248
57641 09/02/99 000205 KIDS PARTIES ETC PARTY JUMP FOR HALLOWEEN EVENT 190-183-999-5370
1,116.00
334.36
632.28
248.30
932.75
381.68
100.00
1,116.00
2,529.37
100.00
57642 09/02/99 002789 KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION TEMP HELP W/E 08/01MUELLER 001-120-999-5118
57642 09/02/99 002789 KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION TEMP HELP W/E 08/08 MUELLER 001-120-999-5118
57642 09/02/99 002789 KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION TEMP HELP W/E 08/15 MUELLER 001-120-999-5118
57642 09/02/99 002789 KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION TEMP HELP W/E 08/22 MUELLER 001-120-999-5118
57643 09/02/99 000548 KIPLINGER CALIFORNIA LE NEWSLETTER: 12 MONTHS RENEWAL 001-140-999-5228
260.00
427.70
403.00
423.80
73.00
1,514.50
73.00
57644 09/02/99 003631 KLEINFELDER INC JUL GEOTECHNICAL SVCS:PALA RD 210-165-631-5801
57645 09/02/99 001085 L N CURTIS & SONS (3) 02 SENSOR 001-171-999-5242
57645 09/02/99 001085 L N CURTIS & SONS (3) HYDROGEN SULFIDE SENSOR 001-171-999-5242
57645 09/02/99 001085 L N CURTIS & SONS (2) CO SENSOR 001-171-999-5242
57645 09/02/99 001085 I N CURTIS & SONS TAX 001-171-999-5242
57645 09/02/99 001085 L N CURTIS & SONS FREIGHT 001-171-999-5242
57646 09/02/99 000380 LAIDLAW TRANSIT INC TRANSPORT DAY CAMP TO LEGOLAND 190-183-999-5340
57646 09/02/99 000380 LAIDLAW TRANSIT INC TRANSPORT DAY CAMP TO LEGOLAND 190-183-999-5340
57646 0V/02/99 000380 LAIDLAW TRANSIT INC TRANSPORT DAYCAMP TO SKATE CTY 190-183-999-5340
57646 09/02/99 000380 LAIDLAW TRANSIT INC TRANSPORT DAYCAMP TO ICE ARENA 190-183-999-5340
57646 09/02/99 000380 LAIDLAW TRANSIT INC TRANSPORT DAYCAMP TO ICE ARENA 190-183-999-5340
57647 09/02/99 000596
57648 09/02/99
57649 09/02/99
57650 09/02/99 000843
57651 09/02/99 003796
57651 09/02/99 003796
LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES
M.A. ROBINSON TRUST (TE
M.A.ROBINSON TRUST (INT
MCDANIEL ENGINEERING
MEDIEVAL TIMES DINNER A
MEDIEVAL TIMES DINNER A
REGISTRATION:1999 CF:10/10-12
REIMB:FEES:R.C.0FF-RAMP:90-08
REIMB.FEES:R.C.OFF-RAMP:90-08
JUL PROF SVCS:PALA BRIDGE:9715
CHILD TICKETS/DAYCAMP EXCURS.
ADULT TICKETS/DAYCAMP EXCURS.
001-164-604-5258
210-165-605-5801
210-165-605-5801
210-165-631-5802
190-183-999-5340
190-183-999-5340
1,423.00
375.00
660.00
440.00
114.32
10.00
489.11
374.05
274.14
451.32
321.33
295.00
3,031.09
1,010.36
780.35
1,244.10
312.61
1,423.00
1,599.32
1,909.95
295.00
3,031.09
1,010.36
780.35
1,556.71
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
09/02/99 16:43 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
57652 09/02/99 MESA, EZEQUIEL REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900
100.00
100.00
57653 09/02/99 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 001-2340 3,154.30
57653 09/02/99 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 165-2340 103.83
57653 09/02/99 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 190-2340 311.52
57653 09/02/99 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 193-2340 14.29
57653 09/02/99 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 280-2340 62.29
57653 09/02/99 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 300-2340 20.76
57653 09/02/99 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 340-2340 66,45
57653 09/02/99 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP COBRA DENTAL SEPT 99 001-1180 143.08
3,876.52
57654 09/02/99 MEYER, CAROL
REFUND: MUSiC-YOUNG CHILDREN 190-183-4982
30.00
30.00
57655 09/02/99 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUS.CARDS:C.ADK[SSON-FLOHR 190-180-999-5222
57655 09/02/99 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 190-180-999-5222
38.25
2.96
41.21
57656 09/02/99 000228 MOBIL CREDIT FINANCE CO FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-170-999-5262
57656 09/02/99 000228 MOBIL CREDIT FINANCE CO FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-164-601-5263
57656 09/02/99 000228 MOBIL CREDIT FINANCE CO FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-110-999-5263
130.89
44.44
18.82
194.15
57657 09/02/99 002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS
MISC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:PW 001-164-601-5218
11.05
11.05
57658 09/02/99 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT ADVERTISEMENT:4TH OF JULY 190-180-999-5254
57658 09/02/99 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT ADVERTISEMENT:SR CTR WORKSHOP 210-190-163-5802
57658 09/02/99 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT DISPLAY ADS FOR COMMISSIONS 001-120-999-5254
142.82
99.97
160.68
403.47
57659 09/02/99 003780 0 M B ELECTRICAL ENGINE JUL ENG SVCS:STR LIGHTING:9508 280-199-807-5802
57660 09/02/99 OLD REPUBLIC TITLE CO. OVERPMT FEES:B99-O434:#15818DC 001-2660
3,442.75
552.88
3,442.75
552.88
57661 09/02/99 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 190-180-999-5214
57661 09/02/99 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-165-999-5214
57661 09/02/99 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-162-999-5214
57661 09/02/99 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 190-180-999-5214
57661 09/02/99 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-164-601-5214
57661 09/02/99 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 340-199-701-5214
57661 09/02/99 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 190-180-999-5214
57661 09/02/99 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CREDIT: BILLING ERROR 190-180-999-5214
93.91
39.95
15.95
102.84
64.11
122.71
84.18
1.00-
522.65
57662 09/02/99 002256 P & D CONSULTANTS INC JUL BLDG INSPECTOR SERVICES 001-162-999-5118
14,256.00
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 001-2090 86.61
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 165-2090 109.93
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 280-2090 36.64
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 001-2090 23.81
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 190-2090 81.52
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA 001-2090 112.33
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 001-2090 315.48
57663 09/U2/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 190-2090 68.57
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 340-2090 12.71
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISER 001-2090 5.76
14,256.00
VOUCHRE2
09/02/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
16:43
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS REV
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO
57663 0g/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD
57663 0)/d2/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISER
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PC
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS DED
57663 09/02/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS-ADM
57664 09/02/99 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T
09/02/99
0~/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
57665
57665
57665
57665
57665
57665
57665
57665
57665
57665
57665
57665
57665
57665
57665
57665
57665
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2090
190-2090
340-2090
001'2090
001-2090
001-2090
165-2090
190-2090
194-2090
280-2090
001-2090
190-2090
280-2090
001-2090
300-2090
001-2090
190-2090
191-2090
193-2090
194-2090
280-2090
330-2090
340-2090
001-2090
001-2090
190-2090
340-2090
001-2090
001'2090
001-2090
001-2090
001-2122
190-180-999-5222
320-199-999-5250
001'140-999-5222
001-161-999-5222
001-161-999-5220
001-140-999'5220
001-161-999-5220
280'199-999-5362
190-180-999-5301
001-164'601-5260
001-150'999-5260
190-183-999-5320
190-183-999-5310
190-183-999-5320
190-180'999-5301
190-180-999-5301
001-164-601-5250
ITEM
AMOUNT
261.19
22.04
9.44
158.83
1,304.86-
852.69
217.16
268.37
67.09
72.38
1~799.11
371.72
3.29
720.19
40.84
6~327.43
1,357.83
16.44
403.82
92.08
3.55
164.41
756.76
1,648.34
5,627.31
705.65
118.97
562.00
2,545.17
1,346.13
147.27
266.29
4.85
20.20
14.55
3.02
5.87
16.17
13.27
28.23
15.45
15.00
9.53
12.64
6.47
4.32
34.97
37.52
6.69
PAGE 8
CHECK
AMOUNT
26,236.00
266.29
VOUCHRE2
09/02/99 16:43
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER bATE NUMBER
57665 09/02/99 000249
57665 09/02/99 000249
57665 09/02/99 000249
57665 09/02/99 000249
57665 09/02/99 000249
57667 09/02/99 000254
57667 09/02/99 000254
57667 09/02/99 000254
57668 09/02/99 002110
57669 09/02/99 003762
57670 09/02/99 000262
57670 09/02/99 000262
57671 09/02/99 000907
57671 09/02/99 000907
57672 09/02/99
57673 09/02/99 003591
57674 09/02/99 000418
57675 09/02/99 002940
57676 09/02/99
57677 09/02/99 003001
57678 09/02/99 002743
57679 09/02/99 003801
57679 09/02/99 003801
57680 09/02/99 000403
57681 09/02/99 003734
57682 09/02/99 003804
57682 09/02/99 003804
57682 09/02/99 003804
57683 09/02/99 000645
57683 09/02/99 000645
57684 0~'/J2/99 000537
57684 09/02/99 000537
57684 09/02/99 000537
VENDOR
NAME
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRIME EQUIPMENT
PROMEDIX.COM
RANCHO CAIlF WATER DIST
RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST
RANCHO CAR WASH
RANCHO CAR WASH
RCTOA - RVSD COMMUNITY
RENES COMMERCIAL MANAGE
RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & RE
RIVERSIDE CO OF (GIS SY
ROSAS CANTINA
ROSS FENCE COMPANY
SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH
SELF'S JANITORIAL SERVI
SELF'S JANITORIAL SERVI
SHAWN SCOTT POOL & SPA
SHERWOOD, ALAN K.
SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY
SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY
SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEHY
SMART & FINAL INC
SMART & FINAL INC
SO CAL]F EDISON
SO CALIF EDZSON
SO CAL[F EDISON
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PUBLIC NOTICE:99-20
PUBLIC NOTICE:8-12-020
PUBLIC NOTICE:94-08
RENTAL EQUIPMENT:PW MAINT CREW
SUPPLIES FOR CITY MEDIC SQUAD
AUG:O1-99-O2003-O:DUCK POND
AUG:O2-79-10100-1:NW SPORTS PK
CITY VEHICLE DETAIL]NG& GAS
CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS
ENROLLMNT:PREVENTIN 1C:WINDSOR
R-O-W WEED SPRAYING:RNBW CYN
WEED ABATEMENT RECORDING FEE
3RD QTR PERIOD 1 GIS SERVICES
OVERPAYMENT OF FEES:B99-1728
RES.IMPROVEMENT PRGM:R.LOPEZ
LOCKSMITH SVCS:SAM HICKS PARK
AUG CUSTODIAL SVC:PARKS/6TH ST
AUG CUSTODIAL SVC:PARKS/6TH ST
AUG POOL MAINTENANCE:TES
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
SUPPLIES FOR AQUATICS
RECREATION SUPPLIES FOR TCC
AUG:2-11-OO7-O455:6TH ST
AUG:2-14-204-1615:FRNT ST RD]O
AUG:2-19-184-1824:R.C.TC1
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-171-999-5220
190-183-999-5340
190-180-999-5301
190-182-999-5301
190-180-999-5220
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-164-601-5238
001-171-999-5242
190-180-999-5240
190-1270
340-199-701-5214
340-199-701-5263
001-171-999-5261
001-164-601-5402
001-162-999-5440
001-2030
001-2660
165-199-813-5804
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5250
001-164-603-5250
190-180-999-5212
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5310
190-184-999-5301
001-164-603-5240
340-199-701-5240
191-180-999-5319
ITEM
AMOUNT
14.35
21.52
7.53
14.00
17.21
9.50
9.00
7.25
134.57
149.98
5,032.43
415.29
6.00
9.23
95.00
2,500.00
10.00
709.26
101.25
1,298.00
50.00
2,117.50
192.50
727.80
120.00
512.00
2~448.00
256.00
133.58
16.34
402.03
21.03
161.42
PAGE 9
CHECK
AMOUNT
323.36
25.75
134.57
149.98
5,447.72
15.23
95.00
2,500.00
10.00
709.26
101.25
1,298.00
50.00
2,310.00
727.80
120.00
3,216.00
149.92
VOUCHRE2
09/02/99 16:43
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 10
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
57684 09/02/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
57684 09/02/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
57684 09/02/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
57684 09/02/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
57684 09/02/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
57684 09/02/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
57684 09/02/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
57684 09/02/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
57684 09/02/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
57684 09/02/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
57684 09/02/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
57684 09/02/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
57684 09/02/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
57684 09/02/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
57684 09/02/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
57684 09/02/99 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
57685 09/02/99 000519
SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
AUG:2-18-937-3152:MORENO RD
AUG:2-19-683-3263:FRONT ST PED
AUG:2-O2-351-4946:SR CTR
AUG:2-OO-397-5042:CITY HALL
AUG:2-OO-397-5067:VAR]OUS MTRS
AUG:2-OO-397-5067:VAR]OUS MTRS
AUG:2-18*O49-6416:FRONT ST PED
AUG:2-19-321-6512:HWY 79
AUG:2-18-555-7006:MORENO RD TC
AUG:2-18-799-7911:MORENO RD TC
AUG:2-02-502-8077: MNTC FAC
AUG:2-19-171-8568:WEDD.CHAPEL
AUG:2-19-999-9442:VARIOUS MTRS
AUG:2-19-999-9442:VARIOUS MTRS
AUG:2-18-589-9739:VARIOUS MTRS
AUG:64-77-350-1600-91:MCCABE
190-185-999-5240
001-164-603-5319
190-181-999-5240
340-199-701-5240
191-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
001-164-603-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
340-199-702-5240
190-185-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
190-180-999-5240
AUG PEST CONTROL SVC:MAINT FAC 340-199-702-5250
425.25
292.37
1~354.41
5,782.27
13.82
828.45
187.92
148.79
117.11
59.85
1,123.74
42.56
27.28
23.56
36.33
3,124.25
40.00
14,172.44
40.00
57686 09/02/99 000465 STRADLEY, MARY KATHLEEN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
57686 09/02/99 000465 STRADLEY, MARY KATHLEEN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
572.00
212.00
784.00
57687 09/02/99 003599
57687 09/02/99 003599
T Y LIN INTERNATIONAL
T Y LIN INTERNATIONAL
57688 09/02/99 000305 TARGET STORE
57688 09/02/99 000305 TARGET STORE
57688 09/02/99 000305 TARGET STORE
57688 09/02/99 000305 TARGET STORE
57688 09/02/99 000305 TARGET STORE
57688 09/02/99 000305 TARGET STORE
57688 09/02/99 000305 TARGET STORE
57689 09/02/99 003318 TARTAGLIA, MARIO
57690 09/02/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
57690 09/02/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
57690 09/02/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
57690 09/02/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
57690 09/02/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
57690 09/02/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
57690 09/02/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
57691 09/02/99 003770 TECH AID
57691 09/02/99 003770 TECN AID
57692 09/02/99 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE
57692 09/02/99 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE
57692 09/02/99 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE
57692 09/02/99 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE
57692 09/02/99 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE
JUL SUPPORT SVCS:OVERLAND:9511
JUL PROF SVCS:OVERLAND DR:9511
SUPPLIES FOR MOBILE RECREATION
SUPPLIES FOR MOBILE RECREATION
SUPPLIES FOR MOBILE RECREATION
MISC SUPPLIES FOR DAY CAMP
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:PW
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:PW
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:PW
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
001547 UN DUES
001547 UN DUES
001547 UN DUES
001547 UN DUES
001547 UN DUES
001547 UN DUES
001547 UN DUES
TEMP HELP W/E 8/07 BRAGG
TEMP HELP W/E 8/14 BRAGG
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
210-165-604-5804
210-165-604-5804
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
190-183-999-5340
001-163-999-5220
001-164-604-5220
001-165-999-5220
190-183-999-5330
001-2125
190-2125
191-2125
193-2125
194-2125
320-2125
330-2125
001-165~999-5118
001-165-999-5118
001-1020
165-1020
190-1020
194-1020
330-1020
1,079.20
272.00
66.39
64.00
8.61
56.84
23.34
23.34
23.34
552.0O
492.00
65.60
1.03
12.30
3.07
20.50
20.5O
907.20
907.20
3,006.30
290.00
611.93
16.00
80,00
1,351.20
265.86
552.00
615.00
1,814.40
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
09/02/99 16:43 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 11
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
57692 09/02/99 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 193-1020
57692 09/02/99 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 280-1020
57692 09/02/99 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 300-1020
57692 09/02/99 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 320-1020
57692 09/02/99 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 340-1020
57693 09/02/99 000308 TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATI SITE SPONSOR AGRMNT:TRACTOR RC 001-111-999-5264
57694 09/02/99 TEMEKA ADVERTISING, INC REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900
113.50
190.00
10.00
350.00
5.00
10,000.00
100.00
4,672.73
10,000.00
100.00
57695 09/02/99 002452 TOP LINE INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE SUPPLiES:PATCH TRK 001-164-601-5214
19.40
19.40
57696 09/02/99 003031 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE SUPPLIES FOR PW MAINT CREWS
57696 09/02/99 003031 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE SUPPLIES FOR P~ MAINT CREWS
001-164-601-5218
001-164-601-5218
504.30
255.34
759.64
57697 09/02/99 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 001-2360
57697 09/02/99 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 165-2360
57697 09/02/99 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 190-2360
57697 09/02/99 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 191-2360
57697 09/02/99 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 193-2360
57697 09/02/99 003560 TRANSAMERiCA 003560 AD&D 194-2360
57697 09/02/99 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 280-2360
57697 09/02/99 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 300-2360
57697 09/02/99 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 320-2360
57697 09/02/99 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 330-2360
57697 09/02/99 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 340-2360
134.63
3.01
25.46
.08
2.90
.67
1.49
.74
3.00
1.50
3.52
177.00
57698 09/02/99 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330
57698 09/02/99 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G TCSD iNSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330
57698 09/02/99 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330
57698 09/02/99 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330
57698 09/02/99 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G TCSD iNSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330
341.60
244.00
439.20
211.20
369.60
57699 09/02/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 001-2080 8,954.59
57699 09/02/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 165-2080 210.23
57699 09/02/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 190-2080 1,529.46
57699 09/02/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 193-2080 61.67
57699 09/02/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 194-2080 5.00
57699 09/02/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 280-2080 85.23
57699 09/02/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 300-2080 83.33
57699 09/02/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 320-2080 666.66
57699 09/02/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 340-2080 194.41
57700 09/02/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 001-2160
57700 09/02/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETiR 165-2160
57700 09/02/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 190-2160
57700 09/02/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 280-2160
57700 09/u2/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 320-2160
57700 09/02/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 330-2160
57700 09/02/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 340-2160
1,278.60
11.90
1,554.52
2.78
63.24
53.38
68.58
1,605.60
11,790.58
3,033.00
VOUCHRE2
09/02/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
57701
57701
57702
57703
57703
57703
57703
57703
57703
57703
57704
57705
57706
57707
16:43
CHECK
DATE
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
09/02/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
002702
002702
000325
000325
000325
000325
000325
000325
000325
001342
VENDOR
NAME
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
VANELLA, INES
WALCZAK, PAT
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY I
WOEHRLE, MELISSA
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
POSTAGE:CITY INFO MAILING
POSTAGE:CITY INFO MAILING
SHIPPING CHARGE:TIME CAPSULE
000325 UW
000325 UW
O00325 UW
000325 UW
000325 UW
000325 UW
000325 UW
REFUND: FIELD RENTAL
REFUND: HATHA YOGA
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
REFUND: CALLIGRAPHY
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-110-999-5230
001-111-999-5230
280-199-999-5362
001-2120
165-2120
190-2120
280-2120
300-2120
320-2120
330-2120
190-183-4988
190-183-4982
340-199-701-5212
190-183-4982
ITEM
AMOUNT
1,200.00
1,200.00
110.37
225.45
3.75
20.00
1.55
.25
4.00
5.00
30.00
30.00
211.48
68.00
PAGE 12
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,400.00
110.37
260.00
30.00
30.00
211.48
68.0O
TOTAL CHECKS 701,892.53
VOUCHRE2
09/02/99
17:08
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
261 CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
AMOUNT
641,448.26
209.00
10,560.90
1,538,219.36
61.80
1,320.80
9,188.35
45,812.66
20,338.61
TOTAL 2,267,159.74
VOUCHRE2
09/02/99
17:08
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
57710
57710
57711
57712
57712
57712
57712
57713
57713
57713
57714
57715
57715
57715
57715
57715
57716
57716
57716
57716
57716
57716
57717
57718
57718
57719
57719
57720
57721
57721
57721
57721
57722
57723
57724
57724
57724
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
003717
003717
003071
003567
003567
003567
003567
003629
003629
003629
000164
003592
003592
003592
003592
003592
002140
002140
002140
002140
002140
002140
003631
003800
003800
003641
003641
002256
002406
002406
002406
002406
003521
003702
002412
002412
002412
AMERICAN ASPHALT REPAIR
AMERICAN ASPHALT REPAIR
BIDAMERICA
C C MYERS INC
C C MYERS INC
C C MYERS INC
C C MYERS INC
CALTROP ENGINEERING COR
CALTROP ENGINEERING COR
CALTROP ENGINEERING COR
ESGIL CORPORATION
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION
JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS
JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS
JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS
JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS
JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS
JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS
KLEINFELDER INC
MCLAUGHLIN ENGINEERING
MCLAUGHLIN ENGINEERING
MEGA ELECTRIC COMPANY
MEGA ELECTRIC COMPANY
P & D CONSULTANTS INC
PACIFIC BUSINESS INTERI
PACIFIC BUSINESS INTERI
PACIFIC BUSINESS INTERI
PACIFIC BUSINESS INTERI
PRO GREENS INC
RACEWAY FORD INC
RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
STREET SEALING PROJ. #PW99-04
10% RETENTION FOR INV 83373
SCAN FORMS FOR BLDG PERMITS
AUG PRGS PMT#6:OVERLAND:95-11
RET.W/H PMT#6:OVERLAND:95-11
REVERSE RETENTION:CREDIT MEMO
CREDIT:EXCESS-WORK COMPLETED
JUL BRIDGE INSPECTION:OVRLAND
AUG PROF SVCS:OVERLAND:95-11
AUG PROF SVCS:OVERLAND:95-11
JUL 1999 PLAN CHECK SVCS
AUG PRGSS:SANTA GERTRUDIS BIKE
AUG PRGS PMT#6:PALA BRDG:97-15
C/O PRGS PMT#6:PALA BRDG:97-15
RET.W/H PMT#6:PALA BRDG:97-15
RETENTION:AUG PRGSS:BIKE TRAIL
PURCHASE NOVELL WORKS SOFTWARE
INSTALL NOVELL WORKS SOFTWARE
SALES TAX
PURCHASE FIREWALL SOFTWARE
INSTALL FIREWALL SOFTWARE
SALES TAX
JUL INSPECTION SVCS:OVRLD OVRC
ADD'L RAMP IMPROVE:RC/I15:9512
RET.W/H PMT#1:RC/115:95-12
6&7/99 PRGS PMT:TVHS TENNIS CT
CR:RET.W/H PMT:TVHS TENNIS CT.
JUL:TEMP HELP:AUSTIN/HENDERSON
FURNITURE/EQUIP:RECORDS MGMT
LABOR TO INSTALL FURN & EQUIP
SALES TAX
CREDIT: SALES TAX ON LABOR
LDSCP REHAB:SPORTS PARK
PURCHASE OF RESCUE SQUAD TRUCK
JUL 99 LEGAL SERVICES
JUL 99 LEGAL SERVICES
JUL 99 LEGAL SERVICES
001-164-601-5402
001-2035
001-162-999-5250
210-165-604-5804
210-2035
210-2035
210-165-604-5804
210-165-604-5801
210-165-604-5801
210-165-604-5801
001-162-999-5248
210-190-147-5804
210-165-631-5804
210-165-631-5804
210-2035
210-2035
320-1980
320-1980
320-1980
320-1980
320-1980
320-1980
210-165-604-5801
210-165-711-5804
210-2035
210-190-155-5804
210-2035
001-162-999-5118
001-120-999-5601
001-120-999-5601
001-120-999-5601
001-120-999-5601
190-180-999~5416
310-1910
001-130-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
233,589.73
23,358.97-
5,358.40
1,066,662.43
106,666.24-
250.40
2,504.00-
13,523.50
1,558.75
10,728.50
15,951.87
72,003.20
293,992.70
4,004.95
29,799.76-
7,200.32-
8,555.00
1,800.00
663.02
7,685.00
1,040.00
595.59
8,084.00
156,770.00
15,677.00-
77,603.70
7,760.37-
11,592.00
4,627.51
650.00
409.01
110.83-
8,000.00
45,812.66
9,056.86
852.00
6,665.50
210,230.76
5,358.40
957,742.59
25,810.75
15,951.87
333,000.77
20,338.61
8,084.00
141,093.00
69,843.33
11,592.00
5,575.69
8,000.00
45,812.66
VOUCHRE2
09/02/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
57724
57724
57724
57724
57724
57724
57724
57724
57724
57724
57724
57724
57724
57724
57724
57724
57724
57724
57724
57725
17:08
CHECK
DATE
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
00/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
09/14/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
000406
VENDOR
NAME
RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH
RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
JUL 99 LEGAL SERVICES
JUL 99 LEGAL SERVICES
JUL 99 LEGAL SERVICES
JUL 99 LEGAL SERVICES
JUL 99 LEGAL SERVICES
JUL 99 LEGAL SERVICES
JUL 99 LEGAL SERVICES
JUL 99 LEGAL SERVICES
JUL 99 LEGAL SERVICES
JUL 99 LEGAL SERVICES
JUL 99 LEGAL SERVICES
JUL 99 LEGAL SERVICES
JUL 99 LEGAL SERVICES
JUL 99 LEGAL SERVICES
JUL 99 LEGAL SERVICES
JUL 99 LEGAL SERVICES
JUL 99 LEGAL SERVICES
JUL 99 LEGAL SERVICES
JUL 99 LEGAL SERVICES
6/3-6/30/99 LAW ENFORCEMENT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-180-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
261-199-999-5246
300-199-999-5246
210-165'604-5801
210-165-604-5801
210-165'604-5801
210-165-631-5801
300-199-999'5246
300-199-999-5246
300-199-999-5246
300-199'999-5246
280-199-999-5246
280-199-999-5246
165-199-999-5246
001-2030
ITEM
AMOUNT
2,560.90
91.00
143.00
130.50
228.00
1,220.17
61.80
9.65
86,73
1,822.23
59.46
676.50
1,230.60
5,121.10
1,008.00
1,819.00
890.85
429.95
209.00
374,352.51
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
34,372.80
374,352.51
TOTAL CHECKS 2,267,159.74
ITEM 4
APPROVAL
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberrs, Director of Finance
September 14, 1999
City Treasurer's Report as of July 31, 1999
PREPARED BY:
Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director~
RECOMMENDATION:
as of July 31, 1999.
That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's Report
DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio and
receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government Code Sections 53646
and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with Government
Code Sections 53601 and 53635 as of July 31, 1999.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
Attachments: 1. City Treasurer's Report as of July 31, 1999
2. Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Equity as of July 31, 1999
3. Fund Equity Detail by Fund as of July 31, 1999
City of Temecula
City Treasurcr's Report
As of July31, 1999
Cash Activity for the Month of July
Cash and Investments as of July 1, 1999
Cash Receipts
Cash Disbumements
Cash and Investments as of July 31, 1999
$ 56,070,205
3,537,550
(6,621,090)
$ 52,986,665
Cash and Investments Portfolio:
Maturity/ Contractual/
Termination Market
Type of Investment Institution Yield Date Value
Petty Cash City Hall n/a $ 1,500
General Checking Union Bank n/a (749,966)
Sweep 3 ~count Union Bank 4.090 % 945,814
(Mon, '; ~Iarket Account) (Highmark U.S. Treasury)
Benefit Demand Deposits Union Bank n/a 4,742
Local Agency Investment Fund State Treasurer 5.178 % 43,128,188
Certificate of Deposit Community Bank 4.550 % 248,716
(Retention Escrow)
Savings Account California Bank Trust 4.400 % 148,806
(Retention Escrow)
Savings Account Union Bank 4.880 % 225,096
(Retention Escrow)
Various U.S. Bank Various 145,026
(Retention Escrow)
Checking Account Union Bank n/a 4,656
(Parking Citations)
Trust Accounts- Measure A U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 4.170 % 151
(Money Market Account)
Trust Accounts- CFD 88-12 U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 4.170 % 3,173,356
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Account- CFD 88-12 CDC Funding Corp 5.430 % 9/1/2017 1,531,469
(Investment Agreement)
Delinq. Main. Reserve Account - CFD 88-12 CDC Funding Corp 5.422 % 9/1/2017 500,000
(Investment Agreement)
Trust Accounts- CFD 98-1 U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 4.170 % 53,838
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Account- CFD 98-1 State Treasurer 5.178 % 940,896
(Local Agency Investment Fund)
Trust Accounts-TCSD COPs U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 4.170 % 17,631
(Money Market Account)
Reserve ~ccount-TCSD COPs Bayerische Landesbank 6.870 % 10/1/2012 502,690
(Invest,. nt Agreement)
Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 4.170 % 715,137
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Account-RDA Bonds Bayerische Landesbank 7.400 % 2/1/2013 1,448,920
(Investment Agreement)
Par/Book
Balance
$ 1,500
(749,966) (1)
945,814
4,742 (1)
43,128,188 (2)
248,716
148,806
225,096
145,026
4,656
150
3,173,356
1,531,469
500,000
53,838
940,896
17,631
502,690
715,137
1,448,920
$ 52,986,665
(1)-This mount is net of outstanding checks.
(2)-At July 31, 1999 total market value (including accrued interest) for the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) was $36,801,515,428.
The City's proportionate share of that value is $43,072,021.
All investments are liquid and currently available.
The City of Temecula's portfolio is in compliance with the investment policy. Adequate funds will be available to meet
budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next six months.
City of Temecula
Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Balances
As of July31, 1999
city(l)
Assets:
Cash and investments $ 33,659,376
Receivables 7,600, 150
Due from other funds 137,351
Land held for resale 530,401
Prepaid assets 87, 189
Deposits 506,850
Fixed assets-net 993,499
Total ',ssets $ 43,514,816
Community
Services
District
$ 1,924,921
1,427
17,770
$ 1,944,118
Redevelopment
Community
Facilities
Districts (2)
9,751,524 $ 7,650,844
2,051,295 54
362,064 831
2,103,053
14,267,936
1,124,300
$ 8,776,029
52,986,665
9,652,926
518,016
2,633,454
87,189
1,631,150
993,499
68,502,899
Liabilities and fund equity:
Liabilities:
Due to other funds $ 155,121
Other liabilities 9, 184,988
Deferred revenue 303,601
243,380
362,064
335,681
804,570
831
4,469,582
518,016
14,233,631
1,108,171
Total liabilities 9,643,710 243,380 1,502,315 4,470,413 15,859,818
1,288,267
415,546
(3,075)
Fund equity:
Contributed capital 1,281,781
Retained earnings 631,623
Fund balances:
Reserved (3) 15,061,839
Designated (3) 15,004,439
Undesignated 1,891,424
Total fund equity 33,871,106 1,700,738
Total liabilities and fund equity
9,523,968
3,241,653
12,765,621
14,267,936
$ 43,514,816
1,132,800
3,172,816
4,305,616
8,776,029
1,944,118
1,281,781
631,623
27,006,874
21,834,454
1,888,349
52,643,081
68,502,899
(1) Includes General Fund, CIP Fund, Gas Tax Fund, and other special revenue funds.
(2) Includes CFD 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) and CFD 98-1 (Winchester Hills).
(3) Reservations and designations of fund balance are detailed on the following pages.
ITEM 5
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance~
September 14, 1999
Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
PREPARED BY:
Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance DirectorY'~---'
William B. Pattison, Senior Accountant
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Financial Statements for
the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999.
DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited activity of the City
for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999. Please see the attached financial statements for the
analytical review of financial activity.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
Combining Balance Sheets as of June 30, 1999
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for
the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
Combining Balance Sheet (Internal Service Funds) as of June 30,
1999
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings
(internal Service Funds) for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
Combining Balance Sheet (Community Facilities Districts) as of June 30,
1999
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance
(Community Facilities Districts) for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
CITY OF TEMECULA
Combining Balance Sheets as of June 30, 1999
and the
Statements of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balance
For The Fiscal Year Ended
June 30, 1999
and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes
in Retained Earnings
For The Fiscal Year Ended
June 30, 1999
(Unaudited)
Prepared by the Finance Department
City of Temecula
Combining Balance Sheet
As of June 30, 1999
Assets:
Cash and investments
Receivables
Due from other funds
Advances to other funds
Land held for resale
Total assets
Liabilities and fund balances:
Liabilities:
Due to other funds
Other current liabilities
Deferred revenue
Total liabilities
General
Fund
13,138,885
3,545,997 $
80,154
1,168,143
530,401
$ 18,463,580 $
17,770
4,211,564
303,601
4,532,935
Gas Tax
Fund
80,154
80,154 $
80,154
80,154
R.C. Reimb
District
$ 187,392 $
187,392 $
Dev Impact
Fund
5,203,134 $
85,658
57,197
5,345,989 $
CDBG
Fund
100
100
100
100
Fund balances:
Reserved
Designated
Undesignated
Total fund balances
Total liabilities
and fund balances
2,684,932
9,388,019
1,857,694
13,930,645
$ 18,463,580
80,154 $
$ 187,392 $ 5,345,989
187,392
187,392 $
5,345,989
5,345,989 $
100
Please note that these balances are unaudited
City of Temecula
Combining Balance Sheet
As of June 30, 1999
Assets:
Cash and investments
Receivables
Due from other funds
Advances to other funds
Land held for resale
Total assets
Liabilities and fund balances:
Liabilities:
Due to other funds
Other current liabilities
Deferred revenue
AB 2766 Measure "A" C[P
Fund Fund Fund
$ 43,961 $ 1,886,892 $ 12,477,061
15,863 165,539 3,658,520
$ 59,824 $ 2,052,431 $ 16,135,581
47,217 $ 4,662,417
Marg Rd
Reim Dist
Fund
57,197 $
Total liabilities 47,217 4,662,417 57, 197
Total
$ 32,937,425
7,551,731
137,351
1,168,143
530,401
42,325,051
155,121
8,921,298
303,601
9,380,020
Fund balances:
Reserved 11,454,54 1
Designated $ 59,824 2,005,214 18,623
Undesignated
Total fund balances 59,824 2,005,214 11,473,164
(57,197)
(57,197)
Total liabilities
and fund balances $ 59,824 $ 2,052,431 $ 16,135,581
14,139,473
17,005,061
1,800,497
32,945,031
$ 42,325,051
Please note that these balances are unaudited
City of Temecula
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
General Fund
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
Revenues:
Sales tax
Developmental services:
Planning
Building & safety
Engineering
Grants
AB3229 (COPS)
Fire plan check and inspection
Motor vehicle in lieu
Motor vehicle license fees
Property tax
Property transfer tax
Franchise fees
Transient occupancy tax
Reimbursements
Reimbursements from TCSD
Reimbursements from RDA
Reimbursements from CIP
Investment interest
Business licenses
Vehicle code frees
Miscellaneous
Bids & proposals
Parking citations/impound fees
Operating transfers in
Total Revenues
Annual
Amended
Budget
$ 10,400,000 $
409,000
2,100,000
1,200,000
45,000
105,200
215,000
1,900,700
34,700
1,268,600
275,000
1,175,000
990,000
20,000
162,000
125,000
530,000
1,100,000
175,000
150,000
89,300
20,000
119,500
827,000
23,436,O00 $
YTD
Activity
10,652,400
423,249
2,348,532
1,385,848
6,654
105,268
245,760
2,020,110
57,562
1,346,341
303,645
1,266,610
1,012,582
23,470
162,000
125~000
589,713
1,201,117
187,015
326,589
91,700
22,704
118,575
878,620
24,901,064
Peme~
of Budget
102%
103% (1)
112% (1)
115% (1)
15% (2)
100%
114% (1)
106%
166%
106%
110%
108%
102%
117%
100%
100%
111%
109%
107%
218% (3)
103%
114%
99%
106%
106%
City of Temecula
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
General Fund
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
Expenditures:
Annual YTD
Amended YTD Activity Percent
Budget Activity Encumbr. + Encumbr of Budget
City Council $ 278,140 $ 238,873 $ 238,873 86%
Community Support 458,923 366,886 $ 18,402 385,288 84%
City Manager 687,632 631,637 7, 154 638,791 93%
Economic Development 813,517 702,232 37,519 739,751 91%
City Clerk 617,781 548,924 6,611 555,535 90%
City Attorney 400,000 275,043 275,043 69%
Finance 993,552 886,827 54,897 94 1,724 95%
Human Resources 345,270 321,225 321,225 93%
Planning 1,792,576 1,598,452 83,883 1,682,335 94%
Building &Safety 1,399,959 1,351,441 550 1,351,991 97%
Engineering 1,006,230 872,923 3,000 875,923 87%
Public Works 2,747, 119 1,675, 157 320,772 1,995,929 73%
CIP Admin 1,004,470 763,882 35,476 799,358 80%
Police 5,677,853 5,298,155 1,803 5,299,958 93%
Fire Dept 2,235,385 1,978,267 44,122 2,022,389 90%
Animal Control 55,000 50,893 50,893 93%
Non-departmental 1,470,020 1,448,454 1,448,454 99%
Total Expenditures (Excluding Transfers)
21,983,427 19,009,271 614,189 19,623,460 89%
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures
1,452,573 5,891,793
Operating Transfers Out
7,412,159 7,412,159
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures
and Operating Transfers
(5,959,586) (1,520,366)
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1998
15,451,011 15,451,011
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 1999
$ 9,491,425 $ 13,930,645
Notes:
(1) The variance in developmental services revenues is due to higher than anticipated conmmnity development activity
(residential and mall-related development).
(2) The variance in the Grant revenue is due to the timing of the expenditure and receipt of funds.
(3) The increase is due to the City receiving 100% of AB 233 revenues at July 1,1998 as compared to 50% previously.
(4) Expenditure savings were realized in the areas of consulting, other outside services, and conferences/travel.
(5) ExpenditUre savings were realized in the Community Services Funding program and in Library support.
(6) The variance in the City Attorney expenditures is due to lower than anticipated general legal costs being incurred.
(7) The variances in Engineering and CIP Admin expenditures are due primarily to budget increases approved at mid-year
for personnel costs. The related positions were not filled until the later portion of the fiscal year.
(8) The variance in Public Works expenditures is due to: a) personnel costs as discussed at (8) above, b) budget savings
realized in drainage, street maintenance, and traffic signal maintenance, and c) appropriations approved at mid-year for
"category 1" traffic improvements which had not been expended by the end of the fiscal year.
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(7)
City of Temecula
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
Gas Tax Fund
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
Annual
Amended YI'D
Budget Activity
Revenues:
Section 2105-2107 $ 821,000 $
Investment interest 6,000
Total Revenues 827,000
Expenditures:
Operating transfers out 827,000
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1998
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 1999 $ $
872,712
5,908
878,620
878,620
Encumbr.
Total
Activity
872,712
5,908
878,620
878,620
Percent
of Budget
106%
98%
106%
106%
City of Temecula
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
Rancho California Road Reimbursement District
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
Revenues:
Investment interest
Annual
Amended YTD
Budget Activity
$ 7,112
Encumbr.
Total
Activity
$ 7,112
Percent
of Budget
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1998
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 1999
180,280
180,280
7,112
180,280
187,392
City of Temecula
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
Development Impact Fund
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
Revenues:
Public facilities
Quimby
Street improvements
Traffic signals
Parks
Corporate facilities
Fire protection
Library
Investment interest
TotalRevenues
Expenditures:
Operating transfers out
Annual
Amended YTD
Budget Activity
30,000 $ 145,579
50,000 360,981
1,923,330 2,632,447
284,440 428,067
891,030 1,389,887
249,240 373,829
64,000 99,037
208,400 293,639
284,250
3,700,440 6,007,716
6,888,752 4,500,437
Encumbrance
Total
Activity
145,579
360,981
2,632,447
428,067
1,389,887
373,829
99,037
293,639
284,250
6,007,716
4,500,437
Percent
of Budget
485%
722%
137%
150%
156%
150%
155%
141%
162% (1)
65% (2)
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1998
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 1999
(3,188,312) 1,507,279
3,838,710 3,838,710
650,398 $ 5,345,989
Notes:
(1) The variance in development impact revenues is due to strong development activity for FY 98-99.
(2) The variance in operating transfers out is due to the timing of when DIF funded CIP projects are started and costs are
incurred.
City of Temecula
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
Community 1)cvelopment Block Grant
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
Annual
Amended YTD Total
Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity
Revellues:
Grant revenue $ 314,607 $ 48,444
Total Revenues 314,607 48,444
l'2xpcnditures:
Other outside services 43,007 42,945
Operating transfers out 271,600 5,499
Total Expenditures 314,607 48,444
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1998
tinding Fund Balance, June 30, 1999 $ $
$ 48,444
48,444
42,945
5,499
48,444
( 1 ) The variance is due to the Pujol Street Sidewalk, Senior Center Expansion, m~d Sports Park Tot Lot Upgrade projects
not starting during the year.
Percent
of Budget
15% (1)
15%
100%
2% (1)
15%
City of Temecula
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
AB 2766 Fund
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
Revenues:
AB 2766 $
Investment interest
Total Revenues
Expenditures:
Operating transfers out
Total Expenditures
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1998
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 1999 $
Annual
Amended YTD
Budget Activity
93,500 $ 48,935
13,457
93,500 62,392
302,200 252,500
302,200 252,500
(208,700) (190,108)
249,932 249,932
41,232 $ 59,824
Total Percent
Encumbr. Activity of Budget
$ 48,935
13,457
62,392
252,500
252,500
(1) The variance in the AB2766 revenue is due to supplemental funding awarded to the city that will be received after
the related project costs are complete.
52% (1)
67%
84%
84%
City of Temecula
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
Measure "A"
For the Fiscal Year Ended Jane 30, 1999
Revenues:
Measure "A" $
Investment interest
Total Revenues
Expenditures:
Debt service - principal
Debt service - interest
Operating transfers out
Total Expenditures
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1998
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 1999 $
Annual
Amended YTD
Budget Activity
1,050,100 $ 1,129,998
286,785
1,050, 100 1,416,783
351,909 353,191
212,853 211,724
7,210,187 6,768,938
7,774,949 7,333,853
(6,724,849) (5,917,070)
7,922,284 7,922,284
1,197,435 $ 2,005,214
Encumbr.
Total
Activity
$ 1,129,998
286,785
1,416,783
353,191
211,724
6,768,938
7,333,853
Percent
of Budget
108%
135%
100%
99%
94%
l0
City of Temecala
Statement of t~,evenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
Capital hnprovement Projects Fund
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
ReVCIIUeSZ
Operating transfers in
Grants
Reimbursments
lnvestnlent interest
Article 3 (SB 821 )
Total Revenues
Expenditures:
I~ancho Ca Rd interchange
Overland overcrossing
O~amp widening at Rancho Ca Rd
Intersection monitoring system
Je~brson median
Margarita improvements
Western bypass co~idor
Street sign replacement
Winchester Rd. widening
Traffic signals Butterfiel~{ancho Ca
Pala Rd. bridge
Signal interconnect system
Pavement management
I 15/795 interchange (ulti~nate)
Pala Road improvements
Traffic signals Rancho Ca. Rd./Via Las Colinas
Flashing signals at schools
Traffic signals Wincbestcr~nte~rise
Traffic signals Margarita Rd./Santiago
City sidewalk project
Margarita widening/Ovcrland extension
YneTYWinchester improvements
Winchester Rd. improvenmnts
Jefferson Street lighting
Traffic signals PalM~ambow Cyn.
Traffic signals Rancho Ca. Rd. Meadows Pkwy.
Traffic signals PaubdStation 84
Temecula Park and Ride
Winchester sidewalk project
Storm drain Overlan~argarita
I15 to Avertida De Missiones
Winchester ramp improvements
Traffic signals Margarit~}auba
Traffic signals Margarit~io Pico
Traffic signals Palgolf Valley
(continued)
Annual
Amended Y'iI)
Budget Activity
29,877,025 $ 20,675,752
12,105,500 3,147,927
77,660 173,385
16,164
72,800 72,800
42,132,985 24,086,O28
Encumbr.
Total
Activity
$ 20,675,752
3,147,927
173,385
16,164
72,800
24,086,028
3,866,451 3,552,934 $ 70,700 3,623,634
11,283,350 2,828,557 3,815,526 6,644,083
300,000 142,634 1,442 144,076
240,000 2,000 2,000
45,000
125,000 2,436 2,436
100,675
102,000
1,300,000
117,300
10,009,264 1,882,230 3,765,831 5,648,061
90,364 51,877 38,487 90,364
960,552 11,320 11,320
267,816 39,492 72,816 112,308
900
117,300 83,934 83,934
99,208 96,241 96,241
117,295 87,367 22,455 109,822
112,626 102,611 102,611
9,370 7,122 7,122
4,905,543 3,113,913 1,717,895 4,831,808
1,337,542 922,608 288,748 1,211,356
371,100 276,848 73,962 350,810
307,250 7,051 7,051
36,121 33,676 33,676
12,596 8,483 8,483
30,095 26,755 26,755
216,500 187,530 187,530
97,800 85,568 85,568
804,960 690,330 114,173 804,503
2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000
1,015,427 426,682 142,154 568,836
153,700 7,500 172,760 180,260
127,300 5,137 118,358 123,495
16,400
Percent
of Budget
69%
26%
223%
100%
57%
94%
59%
48%
1%
2%
56%
100%
1%
42%
72%
97%
94%
91%
76%
98%
91%
95%
2%
93%
67%
89%
87%
87%
1 O0 %
100%
56%
117% (1)
97%
City ofTemecula
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
Capital hnprovement Projects Fund
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
Annual
Aanended YTD
Budget Activity
La Serena housing lighting
Pujol st. sidexvalk improvements
Nicholas Elementary sidewalk
Old 'l'o~xq~ south parking lot
Margarita cmnmunity park
Sports park improvements
Duck pond park
Maintenance yard
ADA sports park
Multi-trails system
Winchester creek park
Community Recreation Center improvements
Sports park sidewalks
TVUSI) tennis court lights
Bike path construction - citywide
Maintenance lhcility modification
Rotary park improvements
Senior center expansion
13utterlield stage park improve~nents
Fire station
Museum
City hal 1 improvements
LibrarS.'
Encumbr.
45,000
120,000 5,388
29,000 28,500
900,000 603,670
1,200,881 1,122,475 12,536
1,446
1,647,059 1,569,970 35,207
5,600 50,000 5,600
95,000
224,030 48,274 2,542
328,657 327,175 23,382
74,920 73,445
374,322 364,402 17,369
200,000 18,472 139,639
47,500
600,000 86,597 84,010
29,300 197 24,817
83,000 6,000
25,000
25,343
859,671 672,949 179,909
82,670 78,690 1,373
720,000 74,098
Total
Activity
5,388
28,500
603,670
1,135,011
1,605,177
55,600
50,816
350,557
73,445
381,771
158,111
170,607
25,014
6,000
852,858
80,063
74,098
Total Expenditures 48,415,204 21,807, 138 10,947,691 32,754,829
(6,282,219) 2,278,89O
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures
9,194,274 9,194,274
13cginning l:und 13alauce, July 1, 1998
$ 2,912,055 $ 11,473,164
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 1999
Percent
of Budget
4%
98%
67%
95%
97%
23%
107% (2)
98%
102% (2)
79%
28%
85%
7%
99%
97%
10%
68%
The variances m cIp Fund revenues and in project expenditures are due to the timing of when the various projects
are actually started and costs are incurred.
( I ) Actual costs exceeded project estimate, project budget has been increased in 1999-2000 with the adopted Capital
hnprovemcnt Program budget and a budget transt~r from another signal project.
(2) In house proj cot administration charges were greater than anticipated, based upon actual time spent on the projects.
12
City of Temecula
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
Margadta Road Reimbursement District
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
Total Revenues
Total Expenditures
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1998
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 1999
Annual
Amended YTD Total
Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity
39,220
39,220
$ (96,417) (96,417)
$ (96,417) $ (57,197)
Percent
of Budget
The deficit fund balance is being reduced by reimbursements paid by the Temeku Hills development when building permits are
issued. Reimbursements are expected to be completed within the next year.
Internal Service Funds
Combining Balance Sheet
As of June 30, 1999
Assets:
Cash and investments
Receivables
Prepaid assets
Property, plant and equipment (net of
accumulated depreciation)
Total assets
Liabilities and fund equity:
Liabilities:
Current liabilities
Capital leases payable
Total liabilities
Fund equity:
Contributed capital
Retained earnings
Total fund equity
Total liabilities and fund equity
$
$
hlsurance
Fund
Vehicles
Fund
Information
Systems
Fund
Support
Services
Fund
Facilities
Fund
Total
1,575,577 $ 10,121 $ 237,760 $ 195,647 $ 113,757 $ 2,132,862
19,075 737 2,148 952 22,912
73,796 13,393 87,189
288,319 463,836 140,216 892,371
1,668,448 $ 311,833 $ 702,333 $ 338,011 $ 114,709 $ 3,135,334
$ 65,427 $
277,366
34,874
140,029
174,903
277,366
65,427
$ 37,438 $
37,438
77,271
77,271
$ 114,709 $
500,000 $ 214,539 473,065 94,177
891,082 97,294 163,841 68,931
1,391,082 311,833 636,906 163,108
1,668,448 $ 311,833 $ 702,333 $ 338,011
415,105
140,029
555,134
1,281,781
1,298,419
2,580,200
3,135,334
Please note that these balances are unaudited.
14
City of Temecula
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings
Internal Service Funds
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
IllSIll'aliCe
Fund
Vehicles
Fund
Information
Systems
Fund
Support
Services
Fund
Facilities
Fund
Total
Revenues:
Charges for services $ 298,652 $ 80,730 $ 794,993 $ 212,096 $ 348,516 $ 1,734,987
Investment interest 80,001 1,267 947 8,875 3,923 95,013
Miscellaneous 1,126 328 6 83 1,543
Operating transfers in 49,125 91,994 141,119
Claims recovery 3,955 3,955
Total Revenues 383,734 131,122 888,262 220,977 352,522 1,976,617
Expenses:
Salaries &wages 27,439 164,499 52,547 152,952 397,437
Operating expenses 351,211 2,160 292,753 108,221 201,480 955,825
Interest 13,434 13,434
Depreciation 66,448 284,691 46,316 397,455
Total Expenses 378,650 68,608 741,943 220,518 354,432 1,764,151
Net Income (Loss) 5,084 62,514 146,319 459 ( 1,910) 212,466
Retained Earnings, July 1, 1998 885,998 34,780 17,522 68,472 79, 181 1,085,953
RetainedEarnings, June31, 1999 $ 891,082 $ 97,294 $ 163,841 $ 68,931 $ 77,271 $ 1,298,419
15
Community Facilities Districts
Combining Balance Sheet
As of June 30, 1999
Assets:
Cash and investments
Receivables
Deposits
Total assets
Liabilities and fund balances:
Liabilities:
Due to other funds
Current liabilities
Total liabilities
Fund balances:
Reserved
Designated
Total fund balances
Total liabilities and fund balances
CFD 88-12 CFD 88-12 CFD 88-12 CFD 98-01 CFD 98-01
Capital Achnin Debt Debt Admin
Project Expense Service Service Expense
Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund
$ 3,145,539 $
11,667
1,124,300
4,281,506 $
$ 2,619,960
1,661,546
4,281,506
$ 4,281,506 $
26,459 $ 3,001,736 $ 1,452,248
417 133,475 4,074 $
26,876 $ 3,135,211 $ 1,456,322
2,758 $ 3,135,211 $ 1,456,322 $
2,758 3,135,211 1,456,322
24,118
24,118
26,876 $ 3,135,211 $ 1,456,322 $
Total
$ 7,625,982
83 149,716
1,124,300
83 $ 8,899,998
83 $ 4,594,374
83 4,594,374
2,619,960
1,685,664
4,305,624
83 $ 8,899,998
Please note that these balances are unaudited.
City of Temecula
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance
Community Facilities Districts
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
Revenues:
Investment interest
Special assessments
Bond proceeds
Reimbursements
Total Revenues
Expenditures:
Legal services
Other outside services
City admin charge
Debt service - principal
Debt service - interest
Bond issuance costs
Operating trm~sfers out
Total Expenditures
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1998
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 1999
CFD 88-12
Capital
Projects
Fund
CFD 88-12
Admin
Expense
Fund
$ 134,968 $ 1,545
104,982
2,789
134,968 109,316
3,497
28,192
7,500
39,189
$ 134,968 70,127
4,146,538 (46,009)
$ 4,281,506 $ 24,118
CFD 88-12
Debt
Service
Fund
$ 108,077
1,434,166
1,542,243
$ 138
845,000
650,596
1,495,734
$ 46,509
CFD 98-1
Debt
Service
Fund
$ 39,735
840,960
1,364,438
2,245,133
$ 103
453,183
335,525
CFD 98-1
Admin
Expense
Fund
$ 150
12,102
12,252
$
$ 5,500
7,500
Total
284,475
2,392,210
1,364,438
2,789
4,043,912
3~97
28,330
15,000
845,000
650,596
335,525
788,811 13,000 2,336,734
$ 1,456,322 $ (748) S 1,707,178
17
ITEM 6
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance /~J'
September 14, 1999
Purchase of Three (3) City Vehicles (TCSD, Building & Safety and Fire)
Prepared by: Gus Papagolos, Senior Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the purchase of three (3) Ford model year 2000 vehicles
from Villa Ford for the total amount of $63,578.25.
DISCUSSION: The adoption of the 1999/00 Operating Budget approved the funding for
the purchase of three (3) trucks (for use by the TCSD, Building & Safety and Fire
Departments). These vehicles are additions to the current fleet and will be used by the
maintenance staff in TCSD and the inspector staff in both Building & Safety and Fire.
On July 28, 1999, the City mailed 21 Requests for Proposal (RFPs) to local and surrounding
area vendors for the purchase of the three (3) trucks (see attached vendor list). Of the 21
RFPs that staff sent, four (4) proposals were received as listed below. All of the bids received
were for model year 2000 trucks and delivery is estimated between 60 and 90 days.
Dealer Vehicle/Model Price
Villa Ford Ford F-150, Full-Size $27,983.26
Extended Cab, 4WD
Total Price
Ford Ranger, Mid-Size
Extended Cab 2WD
$17,300.71
$63,578.25
Ford Ranger, Mid-Size
Extended Cab 2WD
Red/White Paint
$18,294.28
Paradise Chevrolet
Full size, Extended Cab
4WD Silverado pick-up
$31,413.05
S-10 Mid-Size
Extended Cab 2WD
$18,361.99
$68,603.37
S-10 Mid-Size
Extended Cab 2WD
Red/White Paint
$18,828.33
Dealer
Advantage Ford
Norm Reeves Dodge
Vehicle/Model
Ford F-150, Full-Size
Extended Cab, 4WD
Ford F-150, Full-Size
Extended Cab 2WD
Ford F-150, Full-Size
Extended Cab 2WD
Red/White Paint
Full size, extended cab
4WD pick-up (2000)
Mid-Size
Extended Cab 2WD
Mid-Size
Extended Cab 2WD
Price
$27,271.49
9,648.70
$21,171.76
$29,052.64
$19,897.12
$21,400.23
Total Price
$68,091.95
S70,349.99
FISCALIMPACT:
purchase.
Adequate funds are available in the Vehicle Internal Service Fund for this
Attachment: Vehicle Vendor List
Vehicle Vendor List
QUALITY CHEVROLET
ATTN: FLEET MANAGER
1550 AUTO PARK WAY
ESCONDIDO, CA 92029
FOLSOM LAKE FORD
ATTN: FLEET MANAGER
9479 MADISON AVENUE
FOLSOM, CA 95630
PLAZA MOTORS
ATTN: FLEET MANAGER
290 N INDIAN CANYON DR
PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262
TEMECULA VALLEY TOYOTA
ATTN: FLEET MANAGER
26631 YNEZ ROAD
TEMECULA, CA 92591
DICK DICKENSON CITY CHEVROLET
ATTN: FLEET MANAGER
P O BOX 85345
SAN DIEGO, CA 92186
TED JONES FORD
ATTN: FLEET MANAGER
6211 BEACH BLVD
BUENA PARK, CA 90621
NORM REEVES SUPER GROUP
ATTN: FLEET MANAGER
26755 YNEZ ROAD
TEMECULA, CA 92591
FULLER FLEET CENTER
ATTN: FLEET MANAGER
560 AUTO PARK DRIVE
CHULA VISTA, CA 91911
HELLER FORD
ATTN: FLEET MANAGER
1717 AUTO PARK WAY
ESCONDIDO, CA 92029
ESCONDIDO JEEP EAGLE/GMC
ATTN: COMMERCIAL MGR
1501 AUTO PARK WAY S.
ESCONDIDO, CA 92029
RANCHO FORD
ATTN: FLEET MANAGER
26895 YNEZ ROAD
TEMECULA, CA 92591
CARRIAGE MOTOR COMPANY
ATTN: FLEET MANAGER
27420 YNEZ ROAD
TEMECULA, CA 92591
INLAND CHEVROLET-GEO
ATTN: FLEET MANAGER
2505 W FLORIDA AVE
HEMET, CA 92545
RIVERSIDE CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH
ATTN: FLEET MANAGER
7979 AUTO DRIVE
RIVERSIDE, CA 92504
GOSCH FORD-LINCOLN
ATTN: FLEET MANAGER
150 CARRIAGE CIR.
HEMET, CA 92545
VILLA FORD
ATTN: FLEET MANAGER
2550 N TUSTI N AVE
ORANGE, CA 92865
ADVANTAGE FORD
ATTN: FLEET MANAGER
1031 CENTRAL AVE
DUARTE, CA 91010
FRITZ FORD
ATTN: FLEET MANAGER
8000 AUTO DRIVE
RIVERSIDE, CA 92504-4118
PARADISE CHEVROLET
ATTN: FLEET MANAGER
26845 YNEZ ROAD
TEMECULA, CA 9259'1
GUNDERSON CHEVROLET
ATTN: FLEET MANAGER
3333 SANTA ANITA AVE
EL MONTE, CA 91731
RACEWAY FORD
ATTN: FLEET MANAGER
5900 SYCAMORE CANYON
ROAD
RIVERSIDE, CA 92507
ITEM 7
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE]'L,J/
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
Shawn D. Nelson, City Manager
September 14, 1999
Support for Senate Bill 3 (Rainey)-Library Construction Bond
PREPARED BY:
Aaron Adams, Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider adopting the following resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SUPPORTING SENATE BILL 3 (RAINEY)
ADDRESSING THE ISSUANCE OF LIBRARY
CONSTRUCTION BONDS FOR CALIFORNIA LIBRARIES
BACKGROUND: Existing law establishes the California Library Construction and
Renovation Bond Act of 1988, which authorizes the issuance of bonds in the amount of
$75,000,000 for the purpose of financing a special library construction and renovation program.
SB 3 would enact the California Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000, replacing
the previously expired bond act of 1988. SB 3 would authorize the issuance of bonds in the
amount of $1,000,000,000 for the purpose of financing of a library construction and renovation
program administered by the State Librarian.
This bill would provide for submission of the bond act to the voters at the statewide general election
on November 7, 2000, and would become operative upon adoption by the voters at that election.
SB 3 was recently passed by the Senate and is currently being reviewed by the Assembly
Appropriations Committee. The passage of this legislation would be very beneficial as planning
progresses for the construction of a central library within Temecula.
With City Council support of SB 3, staff will prepare individual letters of support to all members of
the Assembly Appropriations Committee authorized by the Mayor and all members of City Council.
In addition, SB 3 support is consistent with Westem Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG's)
legislative support of previous measures as well as being endorsed by the League of California
Cities.
FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SUPPORTING SENATE BILL 3 (RAINEY)
ADDRESSING THE ISSUANCE OF LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION
BONDS FOR CALIFORNIA LIBRARIES
THE CiTY COUNCIL Of THE CITY Of TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the California Legislature has declared that public libraries are a supplement
to the formal system of free public education and deserve adequate financial support from
government at all levels; and
WHEREAS, a viable statewide system of public libraries is essential to assist the schools,
support children and to serve the general public in all local communities; and
WHEREAS, community public facilities are an important partner in providing a quality
education for children and ensuring lifelong learning opportunities for all citizens; and
WHEREAS, the public interest is served by providing adequate resources to properly fund
public library facilities and services; and
WHEREAS, local public libraries throughout California need additional funding for the
construction of new libraries, and for the expansion and renovation of existing library facilities to
better serve their communities; and
WHEREAS, the California State Library has recently conducted a statewide survey which
identified a need for over 400 local library projects at a cost in excess of $2 billion; and
WHEREAS, Senator Richard Rainey has introduced Senate Bill 3 establishing the
California Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000, and authorizing the issuance of
one billion dollars in State bonds to fund library construction and renovation projects on a 65%
State--35% local matching basis, and placing this bond measure on the November 7, 2000
statewide general election ballot; and
WHEREAS, approval by the Legislature of Senate Bill 3 would provide California voters the
opportunity to vote on this bond measure in the November 7, 2000 election and to provide a
significant new financing option for expanding and improving California's public libraries;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Temecula hereby endorses and
supports the passage of Senate Bill 3 (Rainey) by the Legislature, and directs the City Council to
notify Senator Rainey, the President pro Tempore of the Senate, the Speaker of the Assembly, the
Governor, Senator Haynes and Assemblyman Thompson of its support.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting held on the 14th day of September, 1999.
Resos\99-40 I
A'I'I'EST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution
No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 14th day of September, 1999, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Comerchero, Lindemans, Stone, Ford,Roberts
None
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Resos\99-40 2
ITEM 8
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhil~e~u~ City Manager
September 14, 1999
Approval of Funds for Landscape Review Services
Prepared by:
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Approve an expenditure in an amount not to exceed $105,000 for landscape review
services with PELA.
BACKGROUND:
The Community Development Department's Planning Division continues to experience an increase
in landscape plan review activity. The Department has retained the services of PELA for the last
6 years. Due to the nature of development activity, its continuing fluctuation and the rapid growth
the City is experiencing, an accurate estimation of fiscal year landscape plan review is difficult.
The current contract with PELA does not expire until January 12, 2001. This action approves the
expenditure for this company for this fiscal year in accordance with the Community Development
Department Planning Division's operating budget.
FISCALIMPACT:
Adequate funds are available in Account Number 001-161-999-5250.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLi\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\pela fuming cc.doc
1
CITY OF Tt'~IECULA
AGREIiiM'E. NT
FOR CONSU'LTA-NT SERVICES
TWIg AGRE~'MF~NT, is made and effective as of January I3, 1996, between the
City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and The Elliott Group, a Landscape
Architectural Firm ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions
set forth herein. the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on January 13, 1996 and shall
remain and continue in effect until January 12. 2001 unless terminated earlier pursuant to the
provisions of Sections 5 or 6 of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in
Exhibit A, attached hemto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant
shall complete the tasks described in the Scope of Work set forth in Exhibit A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithful/y, competently and to
the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described heroin.
Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized
by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hemunder in
meeting its obligations under this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant month/y, in accordance with the payment
rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and
incorporated heroin by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent
on the above tasks.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection
with its performance of this Ag-reement which are in addition to those set forth herein, uniess
such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager.
Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner
as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's written au,thorization is given
to Consultant for the performance of said services. The City Manager may approve
additional work not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no
event shall such sum exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00). Any additional work in
excess of this amount shall be approved by the City Council.
Rg, STAFFRPT~ELLIOTT.CC3 1/1 2196 sn 3
c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted on or about the f'trst business day of each month. for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of
each invoice as to all non-disputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultanUs fees it shall
~ve written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees
set forth on the invoice.
5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREENrENT WITItO~
CAUSE.
a. The City, may at any time. for any reason. with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten
(10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately
cease all work under this Agreement. unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City
suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not
make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City ..
shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination,
provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the
Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City
pursuant to Section 3.
6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consulta.nt's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of
this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant
for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement
immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make
progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's
control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a
default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default
in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the
Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after
service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory
performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of
time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to
terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to
which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.
R:\STAFFRPT~ELLIO'Fr. CC3 1/1 2196 sn it
7. OWNERSHTP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales,
costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the
performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records
of services provided in sufficient detafi to permit an evaluation of services. All such records
shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be
clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the
representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall
give City the fight to examine and audit said books and records. shall permit City to make
transcripts therefrom as necessary, and shall a/low inspection of all work, dam, documents,
proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting
documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer Fdes,
surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be
performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be
used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant.
With respect to computer t'des, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable
written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of
accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer f~es.
c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be
liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location
other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.
8. INDICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect
and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against
any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or
nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may
be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of
Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform
under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence
of the City.
9. INSURANCE REOUIR.EMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for
the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to
property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder
by the Consultant, its agents. representatives, or employees.
R:\STAFFRPI~ELLIOTT.CC3 1/1 2196 sn 5
a., Minimum Scope of rnsurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form CG 0001).
(2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering
Automobile Liability, code I (any auto).
(3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and
Employer's Liability Insurance.
(4) Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the consultant's
profession.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
(1) General Liability: SI,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal
injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance dr
other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general
aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
(2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(3) Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
(4) Errors and omissions liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City
Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured
retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the
Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations,
claim administration and defense expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1) The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered
as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on
behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the
Consultant: premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant: or
R:\STAFFRPT\ELLIOTT.CC~ 1/12/96 sn 6
automobiles owned, leased. hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The
coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection
afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(2)
For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage
shall be primary. insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials.
employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the
City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the
Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(3)
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the
City, its officers. officials, employees or volunteers.
(4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of
the insurer's liability.
(5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that
coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by either party, reduced
in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) d,ays' prior written notice by
certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current
A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
f. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed
by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are
to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by
the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's
insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including
endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications.
i0. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent
contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement.on behalf of
Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither
City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of
Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees or agents. except as set forth in this
Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its
officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City.
R:\STAFFRPT\ELLIOTT.CC3 1/12/96 sn 7
Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability
whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the
Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant tbr
performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or
indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services
hereunder.
11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of
State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in
any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant
shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its
officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the
Consultant to comply with this section.
RELEASE OF 1NFORNIATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be
considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written
authorization. Consultant. its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without
written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney,
voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to
interrogatorlos or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or
relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court
order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court
order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena,
notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatorlos, request for admissions or other
discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the
work performed thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the
City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present
at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with
City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests
provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply
or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.
13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other
party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal
service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to,
R:\STAFFRPT\ELLIOIT,CC3 1/12/96 sn 8
Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in
the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to
the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that parry may later
designate by Notice:
To City:
City of Temecula
a,3 174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
To Consultant:
The Elliott Group
Michael G. Elliott, ASLA
4883 Brockton Avenue
Riverside, CA 92506
14. ASSIGNNIENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written
consent of the City. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant'
to this Agreement, only Michael G. Elliott, ASLA shall perform the services described in
this Agreement. The Elliott Group may use assistants, under their direct supervision, to
perform some of the services under this Agreement. Consultant sh~all provide City fourteen
(14) days' notice prior to the departure of Michael G. Elljolt, ASLA from Consultant's
employ. Should he or she leave Consultands employ, the city shall have the option to
immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said notice
period. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be
payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the dam of termination or as
may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant.
15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall
have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the perXbrmance of the
services described in this Agreement.
16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the
laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the
parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any
litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal
district court with jurisdiction over the City of Temecula.
17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the paxties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All
prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or
written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each
party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein
R:\STAFFRPT\ELLIOIT.CC~ 1/12/96 sn 9
and upon .each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems
material.
18. AUTHORIF TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has
the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to
bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
or
Attest:
June S. Gr~"~
City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
City Attorney
R:\STAFFRPT\ELLIOTT.CC] 1/12/96 sn 10
CONSULTANT
By:
R:\STAFFRPT\ELLIOIT.CC3 1/10/96 sn 12
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
The following is a breakdown of the plan check and the inspection processes for development
projects.
A. PLAiN CHECK
I. DRC REVIEW:
a) Once notified by the project planner that plans have been received, our office
will pick up plans for review and site analysis.
b)
We will provide one (I) review for such things as placement of planrings for
desired effects or purpose (i.e. screening or shading), and conformsnee with
City standards.
c) Our comments and observations will be put into written form and be provided
to the project planer to forward to the submitter.
d) Comments wilI generally be returned to the project planner within two (2) days
and in no case later than one (1) week after notification of plan pick-up.
2. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS:
a) When notified by the project planner that plans have been received, our office
will pick up plans for review.
b)
We will verify consistency with previously approved plans and conditions.
Planting and irrigation plans will be checked for conformance with City
standards. One set of plans will be redlined with comments notifying the
applicant of necessary revisions to be made to bring the plans into conformance
with City standards. Items not addressed in the City standards but that are
outside the profession norms will also be marked for explanations from the
submitteL
c)
Plans will be returned with comments to the project planner for pick-up by the
submitter based on the established process. Comments will also be provided on
disk in WordPerfect format for ease of use by the City.
d)
Once revisions have been resubmitted, we will re-check the plans for
conformance. Should all revisions have been made and all questions answered,
the plans will be ready for approval. If. all revisions are not made, one set of
R:\STAFFRPT\ELLIOTT.CC~ 1/1Z/96 sn 12
e)
f)
g)
plans and the check list will be redlined again and returned to the applicant a
second time for revisions. This process will continue until the plans are
brought into conformance with City standards.
Once plans are ready for approval, our office will review submitted cost
estimates and determine proper bond requirements for each project.
A final set of approved plans (originals) will be stamped "Approved" and be
fled at the City for use when the project goes into the construction stage, after
all bonds have been submitted and are approved and an agreement executed.
Should items need to be checked which are not included in the standards, our
office will coordinate with the City to amend the standards as required for
future use.
h) Comments/redlines will generally be returned to the project planner within I
week and in no case later than 2 weeks after notification of plan pick-up.
B. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION:
Our office will provide construction inspection services in order to insure implementation
is in conformsnee with the approved plans and the City standards. A final inspection
will be provided after all work has been completed per the plahs and specifications.
Written comments will be provided to the project planner after each inspection.
R:\S/AFFRPT\ELLIOTT.CC3 1/12/96 sn 13
EXHIBIT B
SCHEDULE OF PAYMENT
The following is the Schedule of Payment for plan checks and inspections for development
projects:
A. PLAN CHECK
i. DRC REVIEW:
One DRC review will be performed at the following fiat fee per project:
$200.00
2. CONSTRUCTION DRAWING REVIEW:
Construction drawing review will be performed at the following rates based on the
overall project square footage for each project: "
SOUARE FOOTAGE OF PROJECT PLAN CHECK FEE COST PER SO. FT.
0 - 10,000 $:540 (minimum charge) .0:54
10,001 - 25,000 $810 .08 - .031
25,001 - I00,000 $1,080 .043 - .011
100,001 - 135,0(D0 $1,350 .013- .01
135,001 - 165,000 $1,620 .012- .01
165,001 - 200,000 $1,890 .011 - .0l
200,001 - 250,000 $2,160 .011 - .01
2.50,001 - 300,0(X) $2,430 .01 - .008
300,001 - 350,000 $2,7(X) .009 - .008
350,001 - 400,000 $2,970 .(DOg - .007
400,001 & up $2,970 + .0075 for each sq. ft.
above 400,C00 sq. ft.
The above fees are based on 3 reviews. Should plans require more than 3 reviews, an
additional charge of $80.00 per sheet shall be charged.
B. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION:
Construction inspection services and attendance at meetings will be performed at the
following flat fee rate per inspection or meeting:
$225.00
R:\STAFFRPT\ELLIOTT.CCI 1/12/96 sn 14
FIRST AM'F, ND~fI~NT TO AGREEY~NT BETW'EEN
THF~ CITY OF TEMECL~A AND pFJ~AJTHE ELLIOTT GROUP
Tltlg FIRST A1VIENDMI~NT is made and entered into as of April 17, 1998 by and
between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and PFI.A/The F.11iot Clmup
("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth heroin, the
parties agree as follows:
1. This Amendment is made with respect to the,following facts and purposes:
A. On January 13, 1996 the City and Consultant entered into that certain
agreement entitled "City of Temecula Agreement for Consultant Services" ("Agreement").
B. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this
Amendment.
2. All Sections of the Agreement that refer to the Consultant as "The ~lliott GrOup"
shall be changed to "pgl-AJThe Elliott Group" pursuant to the ownership change of said company
on January 6, 1997.
3. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, ill other tenns and conditions
of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
N),',' .9.2 :.:3
FINANGE DEPT
R:IVOLLMUM~4GREE.~.ALLtFfI.~OrTTG. AME 1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the paxties hemto have caused this Agreement to be executed
the day and year fast above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
ATI'ST:
· Jones, g City Clerk .-
Appmved As to Form:
BY:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
NAME:
R:tVOLLMUIffiAGRE~ALLt~rz~O77'G. AME 2
ITEM 9
CITY ATTORNAEPYPROV~
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER ~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
J~erman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
September 14, 1999
Development Impact Fee Agreement with Woodside Homes - Long
Canyon Creek Park/Tract 28510-1 (Campos Verdes Specific Plan)
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
i~'.,:~\Beryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst.
That the City Council:
Approve the Development Impact Fee Agreement between the City of Temecula and Woodside
Homes to establish preliminary fee credits in the amount of 9358,530 for the construction of
Long Canyon Creek Park; Lot 81 of Tract No. 28510-1.
BACKGROUND: On April 13, 1999, the City Council approved the First Amendment
to the Campos Verdes Specific Plan. Pursuant to this amendment, Woodside Homes is required
to dedicate to the City a fully improved 3.15 acre park facility prior to issuance of the 78th
residential building permit. The park site is located east of Margarita Road, on the south side
of North General Kearny Road. The park will include such amenities as a large tot lot, covered
picnic areas, barbecues, open grass area with soccer field overlay, walkways, and parking lot.
In consideration for the development of the park site, Woodside Homes is entitled to receive
fee credits equivalent to the cost of a portion of the park improvements. These credits are
applied against the park component of the City's Development Impact Fees (DIF). The credit
only applies to the improvements that exceed the basic site improvements covered under the
City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby).
The maximum DIF credit available to the developer, based upon a park component of 91,629
per unit for 242 residential units, is 9394,218. City staff has reviewed the attached
construction cost estimate for the facility and has determined that 9358,530 in park
improvements is eligible for DIF credits.
FISCAL IMPACT: Pursuant to the construction cost estimate for the park and the
eligible construction costs, Woodside Homes is entitled to receive 9358,530 in preliminary DIF
credits. The initial DIF credits of 91,482 will be applied to each residential unit on a pro-rated
basis for the first 77 units. Upon completion and dedication of the park at the 78th building
permit, the final fee credits for the remaining 165 units will be adjusted, up or down, in
accordance with the actual construction costs for the park, which will be reviewed, audited and
verified by City staff.
R:\YASlNOBK\AGENDAS\CamposVerdes.difagreement.doc
ATTACH MENTS: 1.
2.
Construction Cost/Fee Credit Estimate
DIF Agreement for Park Improvements
R:\YASINOBK\AGENDAS\CamposVerdes.difagreement.doc
Preliminary Cost Estimate for Long Canyon Creek Park
Tract No. 28510-1; Lot No. 81
Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost
Number
1 Grade Site (import 15,500 CUYD 91.50
fill)
2 Concrete Swale 150 LF 910.00
3 Demo. Ext. Curb 1 LS 91,500.00
and Sidewalk
4 New Curb cut and 2 EA 91,500.00
Sidewalk
5 6" PCC curb 240 LF 98.00
6 6"PCC Curb/Gutter 240 LF 910.00
7 3" AC pvmnt over 8,300 SF 91.50
6" Class II base
8 HC Ramp 1 LS 9250.00
9 Prkg lot,sign,stripe 1 LS 91,500.00
10 PCC pavement 11,950 SF 94.00
11 Tot lot sub drain 1 LS 92,000.00
12 PCC Tot Lot edge 310 LF 925.00
13 HC Play Surface 1,200 SF 915.00
14 Play Equipment 1 LS 957,250.00
15 Wash plstr. sand 1 LS 92,000.00
16 Picnic Tble. Cover 2 EA 93,500.00
17 Picnic Tables 5 EA 91,000.00
18 Cast Metal BBQ's 5 EA 9500.00
19 Drinking Fountain 1 EA 9500.00
20 Steel Fence/Gates 1,085 LF 925.00
21 Split Rail Fence 260 LF 915.00
22 Meter and Lighting 1 LS 97,500.00
@ Picnic Tables
23 Water Meter 1 LS 92,000.00
24 Backflow Prevent. 2 LS 92,000,00
25 Irrigation Cntrller. 1 LS 98,800.00
26 Irrigation system 144,800 SF 90.50
27 Soil Preparation 144,800 SF 90.15
28 Trees - 15 Gal. 76 EA 985.00
29 Shrubs 99 EA 97.00
30 Grnd. Cover 23, 175 SF 90.35
31 Hydroseed Turf 114,000 SF 90.10
32 Plant 1 LS 93,500.00
establishment
33 10% Design Fee 1 LS 925,000.00
Totals
Total
923,250.00
91,500.00
91,500.00
93,000.00
91,920.00
92,400.00
12,450.00
9250.00
91,500.00
947,800.00
92,000.00
97,750.00
918,000.00
957,250.00
92,000.00
97,000.00
95,000.00
92,500.00
9500.00
927, 125.00
93,900.00
97,500.00
92,000.00
94,000.00
98,800.00
972,400.00
~21,720.00
96,460.00
9693.00
98,112.00
911,400.00
93,500.00
925.000.00
9400,180.00
Eligible for DIF
Credit
0
0
0
0
91,920.00
92,400.00
912,450.00
9250.00
~1 500.00
947,800.00
92 000.00
97 500.00
918,000.00
957,250.00
92 000.00
97 000.00
95 000.00
92,500.00
500.00
*'916,975.00
93,900.00
97,500.00
0
94,000.00
98,800.00
972,400.00
821,720.00
96,460.00
9693.00
98,112.00
911,400.00
93,500.00
925,000.00
9358,530.00
* *Item 20: provides credits of $16,275 (815 per LF) for perimeter fencing and 8700 for three (3) steel gates.
R:\YASINOBK\AGENDAS\CamposVerdes .difagreement.doc
PARKS AND RECREATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT
FEE REDUCTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF
TEMECULA AND WOODSIDE CHANTEMAR, INC.
(TRACT NOS. 28510-1, -2, -3 AND -0)
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of September 14, 1999,
between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and Woodside
Chantemar, Inc., as conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes,
which each party acknowledges as true and correct:
a. The City Council of the City of Temecula has enacted a
comprehensive development impact fee ordinance which is set forth in Chapter 15.06 of
the Temecula Municipal Code. The actual development impact fees are set forth in
Resolution No. 98-30 of the City Council as authorized by Section 15.06.020 of the
Temecula Municipal Code CDIF").
b. Developer is the owner of certain real property in the City of
Temecula, which is legally described on Exhibit A., attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference ("Property"). The Property is subject to recorded final tract maps
allowing 242 residential units.
c. The conditions of approval for the tract maps required the
Developer to dedicate certain parkland and to construct certain park improvements. The
Developer' s specific obligations with respect to the construction of these improvements
is set forth in that certain "Parkland Improvement Agreement" between the City and
Developer, dated as of September 14, 1999.
d. Pursuant to Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and
Resolution No. 98-117, Developer' s DII~ obligation for the Park and Recreation
Improvement Component of the fees is three hundred ninety-four thousand, two hundred
eighteen ($394,218) dollars.
e. Pursuant to Section 15.06.050.A2. Developer has requested a
reduction in the Park and Recreation Improvement Component of the DIE The purpose
of this Agreement is to confirm and set forth the appropriate reduction pursuant to
Chapter 15.06 and to provide for the implementation of the fee reduction for the
development of the Property.
2. Pursuant to the Parkland Improvement Agreement, Developer shall design
and construct certain public park improvements on the Property. A portion of these
improvements are public park facilities which are regional or regionally significant public
facilities substantially similar to those facilities that are listed or otherwise identified on
the City' s Capital Improvement Plan within the meaning of Section 15.06.050 A.2. of the
Temecula Municipal Code ("Regional Improvements").
These Regional Improvements are described on Exhibit B., attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. Therefore, Developer
shall be entitled to a reduction in the Parks and Recreation Improvements Component of
the DIF in the amount of the actual costs of design, engineering and construction of the
Regional Improvements completed by the Developer. City and Developer agree that the
estimated cost of the design, engineering and construction of the Regional Improvements
by the Developer is three hundred fifty-eight thousand, five hundred thirty ($358, 530)
dollars and that the Developer' s obligation for the Parks and Recreation Improvements
component of the DIF shall be reduced in this amount and credited to the Developer as
provided in this Agreement. Within thirty (30) days of completion of the Regional
Improvements, Developer shall submit to the City the actual costs of design, engineering
and construction of the Regional Improvements to the City. The adjusted credit will be
applied equally to the remaining homes to be constructed on the Property.
3. The amount of the DIF Parks and Recreation Improvements Component
reduction described in Section 2. Shall be credited equally to the DIF Parks and
Recreation Improvements Component obligation of each residential unit on the Property
at the time of issuance of a building permit. For the first seventy-seven (77) units, the
reduction in DIF shall be fourteen hundred eighty-two dollars ($1,482); thereafter the
reduction per unit may be adjusted pursuant to Section 2 for actual costs of the Regional
Improvements.
a. Developer may transfer these credits to any purchaser of the
Property, or a portion thereof, to be applied to residential units on the Property; provided,
however, the credits may not be transferred to any other person nor may they be used on
any real property other than the Property. Within five (5) business days following a
transfer of these credits pursuant to this Agreement, Developer shall notify the City in
writing of the fact of the transfer and the name and address of the transferee.
b. In the event the Developer is in default under the Parkland
Improvement Agreement, the DIF credit described in this Agreement shall not be applied
to residential building permits until such time as the default is cured.
4. This Agreement shall insure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon the
City and Developer and their respective successors and assigns.
5. This Agreement only affects the reduction in the DIF obligation for the
Parks and Recreation Improvement Component of the DIF and no other portion of the
DIF. Developer shall apply the DIF for each component in accordance with Chapter
15.06 and Resolution (98-117).
6. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under
this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii)
delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal
Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the
United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to
the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later
designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon deliver to the addresses specified
below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service
or United States Mail as provided above:
To City:
City of Temecula
P. O. Box 9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92589~9033
Attention: City Manager
To Developer:
Woodside Chantemar, Inc.
23 121 Antonio Parkway, Suite 120
Rancho Santa Margafita, CA 92688
Attention: Nate Pugsley
7. If either party commences litigation against the other for the purposes of
determining or enforcing its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be
entitled to receive its reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred in the prosecution or
defense of the action.
8. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties
relating to the D[F obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or
contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or
written concerning Developer' s DIF obligations on the Property, are merged into this
Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's
own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
WOODSIDE CHANTEMAR, INC., a California
Corporation
By:
Name:
Title:
By:
Name:
Title:
(Two corporate officer' s signatures required or corporate
authorization resolution)
EXHIB IT "A"
CHANTEMAR LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The Chamemar property (Tract Nos. 28510-1; -2; -3; -0) is situated in the State of
California, Coumy of Riverside, City of Temecula, and is described as follows:
Tract No. 28510 - 1:
Being Parcel "F" and a portion of parcel "C" of Lot Line Adjustmere No. PA98-0054,
recorded April 9, 1998 as Instrumem No. 137810 of official records in the Office of the
County Recorder of said Riverside County (Being located in Lots 3, 4 and 40 and North
General Kearny Road as shown on'Tract No. 3334 filed in Book 54, Pages 25 through
30 of Maps in said Office of the Riverside County Recorder).
Tract No. 28510-2:
Being a portion of Parcel "C" of Lot Line Adjustment No. PA 98-0054 recorded April
9, 1998 as Instrument No. 137810 of official records in the Office of the County
Recorder of said Riverside Coumy (being located in Lots 1, 2, and 3 and North General
Kearny Road as shown on Tract No. 3334 filed in Book 54 Pages 25 through 30 of
Maps in said Office of the Riverside County Recorder and in Lots 141 and 164 of the
Temecula Land and Water Company as shown on a Map thereof filed in Book 8, Page
359 of Maps in the Office of the San Diego County Recorder).
Tract No 28510-3:
Being a portion or Parcel "C" of Lot Line Adjustment No. PA98-0054 recorded April
9, 1998 as Instrument No. 137810 of Official Records in the Office of the County
Recorder of Said Riverside County (Being located in Lot 164 of the Temecula Land
and Water Co. as shown on a Map filed in Book 8, Page 359 of Maps in the Office of
the San Diego County Recorder).
Tract No. 28510-0:
Being a portion of Parcel "C" of Lot Line Adjustment No. PA98-0054 recorded April
9, 1998 as Instrument No. 137810 of official records in the Office of the County
Recorder of said Riverside County (Being located in Lots 1 and 2 and North General
Kearny Road as shown on Tract No. 3334 filed in Book 54, Pages 25 through 30 of
Maps in said Office of the Riverside County Recorder).
EXHIBIT "B"
Preliminary Cost Estimate for Long Canyon Creek Park
Tract No. 28510-1; Lot No. 81
Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost
Number
1 Grade Site (import 15,500 CUYD $1.50
fill)
2 Concrete Swale 150 LF $10.00
3 Demo. Ext. Curb 1 LS $1,500.00
and Sidewalk
4 New Curb cut and 2 EA"' $1,500.00
Sidewalk
5 6" PCC curb 240 LF $8.00
6 6"PCC Curb/Gutter 240 LF $10.00
7 3" AC pvmnt over 8,300 SF $1.50
6" Class II base
8 HC Ramp 1 LS $250.00
9 Prkg lot,sign,stripe 1 LS $1,500.00
10 PCC pavement 11,950 SF $4.00
11 Tot lot sub drain 1 LS $2,000.00
12 PCC Tot Lot edge 310 LF $25.00
13 HC Play Surface 1,200 SF $15.00
14 Play Equipment 1 LS $57,250.00
15 Wash plstr. sand 1 LS $2,000.00
16 Picnic Tble. Cover 2 EA $3,500.00
17 Picnic Tables 5 EA $1,000.00
18 Cast Metal BBQ's 5 EA $500.00
19 Drinking Fountain 1 EA $500.00
20 Steel Fence/Gates 1,085 LF $25.00
21 Split Rail Fence 260 LF $15.00
22 Meter and Lighting 1 LS $7,500.00
~ Picnic Tables
23 Water Meter 1 LS $2,000.00
24 Backflow Prevent. 2 LS $2,000,00
25 Irrigation Cntrller. 1 LS $8,800.00
26 Irrigation system 144,800 SF $0.50
27 Soil Preparation 144,800 SF $0.15
28 Trees - 15 Gal. 76 EA $85.00
29 Shrubs 99 EA $7.00
30 Grnd. Cover 23, 175 SF $0.35
31 Hydroseed Turf 114,000 SF $0.10
32 Plant 1 LS $3,500.00
establishment
33 10% Design Fee 1 LS $25,000.00
Totals
Total
$23,250.00
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
$3,000.00
$1,920.00
$2,400.00
$12,450.00
$250.00
$1,500.00
847,800.00
$2,000.00
$7,750.00
$18,000.00
$57,250.00
$2,000.00
$7,000.00
$5,000.00
$2,500.00
$500.00
$27,125.00
$3,900.00
$7,500.00
$2,000.00
$4,000.00
$8,800.00
$72,400.00
$21,720.00
$6,460.00
$693.00
$8,112.00
$11,400.00
$3,500.00
$25.000.00
$400,180.00
Eligible for DIF
Credit
0
0
0
0
$1,920.00
$2,400.00
$12,450.00
$250.00
$1,500.00
$47,800.00
$2,000.00
$7,500.00
$18,000.00
$57,250.00
$2,000.00
$7,000.00
~5,000.00
$2,500.00
500.00
**$16,975.00
~3,900.00
$7,500.00
0
~4,000.00
~8,800.00
$72,400.00
$21,720.00
~6,460.00
$693.00
$8,112.00
$11,400.00
$3,500.00
$25,000.00
$358,530.00
*Item 20: provides credits of $16,275 ($15 per LF) for perimeter fencing and $700 for three (3) steel gates.
R:\Yasinobk\camposverdes .difa~reement
ITEM 10
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 14, 1999
Completion and Acceptance for the Median Islands on Winchester Road west
of Jefferson Avenue, Project No. PW97-21
PREPARED BY: Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Accept the project "Median Islands on Winchester Road west Jefferson Avenue, Project PW97-
21", as complete; and
File a Notice of Completion, release the performance Bond, and accept a six (6) months
Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; and
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the Notice of Completion,
if no liens have been filed.
BACKGROUND: On November 10, 1998, the City Council awarded the contract to S.
Parker Engineering, Inc. for an amount of $387,392.08. On March 4, 1999, the City Council directed
staff to deleted that portion of the proposed median island from Enterprise Circle North/South to the
ddveway at M & M Tire Company. A contract change order for an amount of -$54,052.81 was approved
by the City Manager to delete this portion of the work. During the construction there were some minor
increase in quantity extension costs, which included base material, curb, grouted river rock, signs,
conduit, wire, irrigation and planting material. Also, there were some decreases in quantity extension
costs, which included asphalt concrete, concrete, adjusting manhole cover, and irrigation material. The
total additional quantity extension cost was in an amount of $6,246.61, bringing the total cost of the
project to $339,585.88.
This project also including the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Winchester Road and
Enterprise Circle North/South. This work is being 80% funded by Surface Transportation Program
(STP), which are Federal funds for local agencies to improve the safety and efficiency of the local
transportation system.
The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and
within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The construction retention for
this project will be released on or about 35 days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded.
F:\DEPTS\PW~,GDRPT\99\0914\PW97-21 .ACC.DOC/seh
FISCAL IMPACT: The total amount for this project was $387,392.08. Contract Change
Order No. I was approved by the City Manager in the amount of -$54,052.81. With some quantity
extension costs of $6,246.61, the total cost of the project is $339,585.88. This project is funded through
Measure A funds in the amount of $240,335.88, Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds in the
amount of $78,744, and a balance of $20,506 from Signal Mitigation (DIF) funds. These funds have
been appropriated in Accounts No. 210-165-686-5804 and 210-165-673-5804.
ATTACH M E NTS:
1. Notice of Completion
2. Maintenance Bond
3. Contractor's Affidavit
F:\DEPTS\PW~GDRPTL99\0914\PW97-21 .ACC.DOC/seh
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND RETURN TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF TEMECULA
P.O. Box 9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR
RECORDER'S USE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described.
2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California 92590.
3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to So Parker Engineering, Inc. to perform
the following work of improvement:
Median Islands on Winchester Road west of Jefferson Avenue (includes Traffic Signal at Winchester
Road at Enterprise Circle North/South)
Project No. PW97-21
4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to
the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted
by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on September 14, 1999.
That upon said contract the Frontier Pacific Insurance Company was surety for the bond given by the said
company as required by law.
5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of
Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT NO. PW 97-21.
6. The street address of said property is: Intersection at Jefferson Avenue & Winchester Road
Dated at Temecula, California, this 14'h day of September 1999.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
ss
Susan W. Jones CMC/AAE, City Clerk
I, Susan W. Jones CMC/AAE, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under
penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE
OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of
Riverside by said City Council.
Dated at Temecula, California, this 14"' day of September 1999.
Susan W. Jones CMC/AAE, City Clerk
; c c prolects',f3w97 ,pw97-21 \cornpletn,not/Seh
~B/3B/1999 1B: 41 7149628437
EXECUTED IN DUPLICATE
PARKER CONSTRUCTION
BOND NUMBER: SD00034905
PAGE 86
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
· . MAINTENANCE. BOND
'. PROJECT NO. 97-21
MEDIAN..ISL4NDS ON WINCHESTER ROAD W/O JEFFERSON AVENUE
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY.THESE PRESENTS THAT,
· S. PARKEi~' ENGINE:gRING,'. 'INC., 10059 WHTPPOORWILT, AVE. ,.' FO[JNTATN _
' 'NAIVE ~I~D ADDRESS OF CONTRA CTOI~
· VALLEY, ' CA 92 7 0'8 ' '
a CORPORATION . . '." .' ' , hereinafter called Principal,. and
(fill in whet~e~ a CorpOration, Partnersl~ip or individual)
FRONTIER pACIFIC. TNSURANCE CONPANY, 4250 EXECUTIVE SQUARP., #.200'.
LA JOLLA, CA'92037..
· .. , . .' N~M~ ~ND ADDRESS OF SURETY · ':'
hereinafter 'calli~d SURETY,. are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA, '"
..'hereinafter+called OWNER,.in the 'penal sum of THIRTY :BIGHT THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDi~D.
'.T..HIRTY ~INE"'.'_ ."..'" .. DOLLARS and TWENTY ONE CENTS "
{$ 3 8,7 39.21 * * * * * * ,' ). in lawful money of the United States, said sum being not less th~ n
ten percent (10%) of the Contract.value payable by the said City of Temecula under the terms
the Contract, for the payment of. which, we bind ourselves, successors and assigns, jointly ard
' severally, firmly by these' presentS.~ :
THE 'CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered. into a 'certa:.n '. '.
· Contract with .the OWNER, dated. the 10TH day of NOVEMBER ,. 19 9 8 , a copy of which :S :'.::
· · hereto attached and made a part hereof for the construction of PROJECT NO. 97-21, MEDIA M
' 'ISLANDS ON WINCHESTER +ROAD WIO JEFFERSON AVENUE.
WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarant,! e
for the period' of SiX-(6) monthS'year 'after approval of the final estimate on said job, by t|"e
OWNER, against all defects' in workmanship end meterisle which may become apparent durin9 sad.
period; and .....
· WHEREAS, the said Contract has' been completed, and was approved on .... 19 , ..
· NOW, THEREFORE. T. HE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if within one year froin
the. date of approval Of the ·Said Contract, the work done under the terms of said Contract sh~ 11.
disclose poor workmanship in the execution of said work, and the carrying out of the terms of sa ,d
.contract, or it shall appear that defective materials were furnished thereunder, then this obligation
shall remaifi in full force and vlrtUe,'otherwise this instrument shall be void.
.Signed and sealed this· 31S.T day of AUGUST , 19 99
(Seal)
MAINTENANCE BOND
~,\11EMEC_FS201%DATA~,DEFT~;~I:~,N~CIRRqOjECT~%p,VVg7~pVV97.21%B/D.DO.':
O
M-I
Signed and sealed this 3 1 ST
(Seal)
day of AUGUST
19 99
SURETYFRONTIER PACIFIC
COMPANY ~
By: ~';'.z4-- ~ ~
DWIGHT REiLLY
(Name)
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
(Title)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
IN SURANCE
:. PARKER
ENGINEERING,
(Title)
(Name)
{Title)
INC.
MAINTENANCE BOND 1%4-2 R:tClP~PROJECTStPWJ~,IRNI;/-21~IID.DOC-
'CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California } ss.
County of San Bernardino
On AUGUST 3 1, 19 9 9, before me,
Dale
personally appeared Dwight Reilly
Susan Puqh, Notary Public
Name and Title Of Officer (e g., 'Jar~e Doe. Notsty Public")
Name(s) ol SIgner(s)
[] personally known to me
[] proved to me on the basis
evidence
of satisfactory
' N°tarYSPUublic - California
Race Notary Seal Above
to be the person(s) whose name~) is/l~J~
subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/~'ttl~be.~ executed
the same in his/b~/~:beir authorized
capacity(lEa0, and that by his/ll~'~/~
signature(s~) on the instrument the person(~), or
the entity upon behalf of which the person(~
acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
""' Signature ol Notary Public
SUSAN PUGH
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document,
Description of Attached Document z,v~iNTENANCp. BOND
Title or Type of Document:
Document Date: AUGUST 31, 1999 Numberof Pages: 2
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: None
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer
Signer's Name: Dwight Reilly
[] Individual
[] Corporate Officer -- Title(s):
[] Padner- [] Limited [] General
~3 Attorney in Fact
[] Trustee
[] Guardian or Conservator
[] Other:
Top of thumb here
Signer Is Representing: FRONTIER PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY
1997 National Nolaty Associ,qlion · 9350 De Solo Ave., P.O. Box 2402 · Chalswodh, CA 91313 2402Prod No 5907Reorder: Call Toll-Free 1-800-876-6~27
(A CahfOrn~a Cornpony)
2250 Executive Square, Suffe 200, La jotlQ, Cahfornla 92037
POWER OF ATTORNEY
~ltottl .2':~[[ 3'I'lL'It ~'{U LTI!L'eL' 1'] rc_-~L'nts: T"at FRONTIER PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY a Cahfornia Corporanon, having its pnncipal office
n La jolla Cahforn~a pursuant to the ': .:,vmg reso~ahon. adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation on the 15th day of November, 1991
'RESOLVED that the Cha~rr"_=.~ :' me Boa,d the President. or any Vice President be and hereby ~s. authorized to appoint Attorneys-m-
Fact to represent and act for a n:: - sena!f of the Company to execute Ponds. undertakingS, recogmzances and other contracts of ~ndemnlty
and wrmngs obligatory m the "at.~re hereof and to attach thereto the corporate seat of the Company, m the transaction of its surety
bus~neSs:
RESOLVED. that the s~gnatu res a- D attestahons of such officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed to any such Power of Attorney
or to any certificate relating there:: s! facs~mne. and any such Power of Attorney or certificate beanng such facsimile s~gnatures or facsimile
seal shall be rand and b~ ndmg ucc" the Company when so affixed wdh respect to any bond, undertakmg, recOgmzance or other contract of
~ndemmty or writing obhgatory n t~e nature thereof:
'RESOLVED that any such Attorre, -,n-Fact dehvering a secretarial certd~cahon that the foregorag resolutions still be in effect may insert in
such certification the date thetee, sa,d date to be not later than the date of denvery thereof by such Attorney-m-Fact."
This Power of Attorney ~s signed an'; sealed ~n facs~mde under and by the authority of the above Resolution.
DOES HEREBY MAKE. CONSTITUTE -:'.2, APPOINT H, J, DUEOK DWIGHT REILLY
VICKI MARTINEZ CHRISTOPHER S. HOPPER
of Upland ,n the State of California
~ts true and lawful Attorney(s)-Pn-Fact ,,i :n full power and authority hereby conferred in its name. place and stead to sign, execute, acknowledge and
delwer ~n ds behalf. and as ~ts act and ceed w~thout power of redelegat~on, as follows:
Bonds guaranteeing the fidelity of persons holding places of public or private trust; guaranteetng the performance of contracts other than
msurance policies; and executing or guaranteerag bonds and undertakings requered or permetted in all actions or proceedings or by law allowed;
IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED THREE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND ($3,500,000.00) DOLLARS; and to bind FRONTIER PACIFIC
INSURANCE COMPANY thereby as fully and to the same extent as ~f such bond Or undertaking was signed by the duly authorized officers of
FRONTIER PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY. and all the acts of said Attorney(s)-in-Fact pursuant to the authority herein given are hereby ratified
and confirmed·
3In [[lit,~,es ]:tll!~'rctff, FRONTI EP PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY of La Jolla. Cahfornla. has caused this Power of Attorney to be signed by its
V~ce President and ~ts Corporate seal to be affixed tms 26th day of August .19 97
FRONTIER PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY ....... ~",';;~;;;~:; .....
~"~' ,.....: ................"' DAVID E- CAMPBELL, Vice President
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO)
On AugUst 26, 1997
before me, Nydia Odiz, personally appeared David E. Campbell, personally known to me or proved to me on the
basis of satisfactory evidence to b e the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same
in his authorized capacity, and that by his s~gnature on the instrument the person(s). or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal
Signature of Notary i.,,.....)
Corporation Acknowledgement
I. the unders~gned. Joseph P LC ugnhn. Sec 'etary of FRONTIER PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, do hereby certify that the original POWER
OF ATTORNEY. of winch the foregoing s a full. true and correct copy, is ~n full force and effect
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I "a.e hereunto subscribed my name as Joseph P Loughlin Secretary. and affixed the Corporate Seal of
the Corporation th,s 31ST cay of AUGUST . t9
:-M~9 5002A FP~296~
· Loughlin, Secretary
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE
PROJECT NO. 97-2 1
MEDIAN ISLANDS ON WINCHESTER ROAD W/O JEFFERSON AVENUE
This is to certify that S. Parker Engineering, Inc. , (hereinafter the
"CONTRACTOR") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that he/she/it has paid in full for
all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the
CONTRACTOR or by any of the CONTRACTOR's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in
contribution to the execution of it's contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building,
erection, construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as PROJECT NO. 97-
21, MEDIAN ISLANDS ON WINCHESTER ROAD W/O JEFFERSON AVENUE, situated in the City of
Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows:
MEDIAN ISLANDS ON WINCHESTER ROAD W/O JEFFERSON AVENUE
The CONTRACTOR declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said
Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any
unpaid sums owing to the CONTRACTOR.
Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the CONTRACTOR hereby
disputes the following amounts:
Description
Dollar Amount to Dispute
Pursuant to Public Contracts Code §7200, the CONTRACTOR does hereby fully release and
acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any
and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the
CONTRACTOR by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contact amount which the
CONTRACTOR has not disputed above.
Dated: 8-3[-99 By:
Signature
Steve T. Parker - President
Print Name and Title
RELEASE R-1 R:\CIP~I~IOJECTS\PW97\PW97-21~BID.DOC
ITEM 11
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
APPROVAL~(~~r~
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN
CITY MANAGER
City Manager/City Council
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 14, 1999
Completion and Acceptance for the I-15 Southbound Off-Ramp Widening at
Winchester Road, Project No. PW97-03
_PREPARED BY: Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Accept the project for the 1-15 Southbound Off-Ramp Widening at Winchester Road, Project
No. PW97-03, as complete; and
,
File a Notice of Completion, release the performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year
Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; and
,
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the Notice of
Completion, if no liens have been filed.
BACKGROUND: On September 22, 1998 the City Council awarded the contract to
Riverside Construction Company for an amount of $234,000.000. Two contract change orders for
an amount of $22,906.36 was approved by the City Manager. Two additional contract change orders
for an amount of $51,884.94 was approved by the City Council on June 8, 1999. Also, there were
some increases in quantity extension costs totaling amount of $493.64. This brings the total cost
of the project to $309,284.94.
The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The construction
~'etention for this project will be released on or about 35 days after the Notice of Completion has been
recorded.
FISCAL IMPACT: The total amount for this project was $234,000.00. Contract change
order nos. I through 4 was approved in the amount of $74,791.30. With some quantity extension
costs of $493.64, bdnging the total cost of the project to $309,284.94. This project is funded through
Capital Reserves and Redevelopment Agency funds. These funds have been appropriated in
Account No. 210-165-697-5804.
ATTACH M ENTS:
Notice of Completion
Maintenance Bond
Contractor's Affidavit
1
R: ~,AG DRPT\9~0q 14XPWc~/-03. ACC. DOC/se.,h
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND RETURN TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF TEMECULA
P.O. Box 9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR
RECORDER'S USE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described.
2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California 92590.
3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to Riverside Construction Company to
perform the following work of improvement:
I-15 Southbound Off-Ramp Widening at Winchester Road
Project No. PW97-03
4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to
the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted
by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on September 14, 1999.
That upon said contract the Safeco Insurance Company of America was surety for the bond given by the
said company as required by law.
5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of
Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT NO. PW 97-03.
6. The street address of said property is: 1-15 Freeway at the Southbound Off-Ramp &
Winchester Road
Dated at Temecula, California, this 14'h day of September 1999.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
Susan W. Jones CMC/AAE, City Clerk
I, Susan W. Jones CMC/AAE, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under
penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE
OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of
Riverside by said City Council.
Dated at Temecula, California, this 14th day of September 1999.
Susan W. Jones CMC/AAE, City Clerk
R:'c~p\prolects\pwg?\pw97*03 ccm~e[n.not/seh
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MAINTENANCE BOND
PROJECT NO. PW97-03
WINCHESTER ~ 16 OFF-RAMP WIDENINC
Bond~5952874
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS THAT:
Riverside Construction Co~3any, 111 N..~.~in Street, Riverside, CA 92502
NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR
a
Corporation
(fill in whetfief a Corporario-:, Pannershil~ or individual/
, hereinafter called Principal, and
SAFECO Insurance Company of America, 4 Hutton Centre, ~250-B,Santa Ana, CA 92707
NAME AND ADDRESS OF SURETY
hereinafter called SURETY. are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA,
heroinafter called OWNER, in the penal sum of Twenty three thousand
four hundred
DOLLARS end zero CENTS
($ 23i400.00 ' ) in lawful money of the United States. said sum ~3eting not less than
l:en perc~n{ (10%) of the Contract value payable by the said City of Temecula under the terms of
the Contract, for the payment of which, we bind ourselves, successors and assigns, jointly and
severally, firmly by these presents.
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whe;p. as, the Principal entered into a certain
Contract with the OWNER, dated the 22nd day of SePternher 19 98, a colby of which is
hereto attached and made a pan hereof for the ~or~structior{ of PROJECT NO. FW97-03,
WINCHESTER e 15 OFF-RAMP WIDENING.
WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee
for the Deriod of ORe (1) year after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the OWNER,
against all defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period;
and
WHEREAS, the said Contract has been completed, end was approved on-Se.~temher 1~, · 1099..
NOW. THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if within one year from
the date of approval of the said Contract, the work done under the terms of said Contract shall
disclose poor workmanship in the execution of said work, and the carrying out of the terms of said
Contract. or it shall appear that defective materials were furnished thereunder, then this obligation
shall remain in full force and virtue. otherwise this instrument shall be void.
Signed and sealed this 31st day of August , 19 99
(Seal)
MAINTENANCE BOND M-I
r:~cip\ptojc;ts~pw97\pw97-03\bid~to~ 1 .cry
' POWER
S A F E (:::: (:::)' OF ATTORNEY
SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
HOME OFFICE: SAFECO PLAZA
SEA'fiLE. WASHINGTON 98185
No. 10433
KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS:
That SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, each a Washington corporation, does each hereDy
appoint
*****************************************************'l"qS'J J. RABB~TT; Sallta t%4oIlica, C81jfo11118***************************************************************=**
its true and lawful attorney(s)-in-fact, with full authority to execute on its behalf fidelity and surety bonds or undertakings and other documents of a similar character
issued in the course of its business, and to bind the respective company thereby.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA have each executed and
attested these presents
this I lth day of June 1999
R.A. PIERSON, SECRETARY W. RANDALL STODDARD, PRESIDENT
CERTIFICATE
Extract from the By-Laws of SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
and of GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA:
"Article V, Section 13. - FIDELITY AND SURETY BONDS ... the President, any Vice President, the Secretary, and any Assistant Vice President appointed for that
purpose by the officer in charge of surety operations, shall each have authority to appoint individuals as attomey.s-in-fact or under other appropriate titles with authority to
execute on behalf of the company fidelity and surety bonds and other documents of similar character issued by the company in the course of its business... On any
instrument making or evidencing such appointment, the s~Jnatures may be affixed by facsimile. On any instrument conferring such authority or on any bond or
undertaking of the company, the seal, or a facsimile thereof. may be impressed or aff'Lxed Or in any other manner reproduced; provided, however, that the seal shall not
be necessary to the validity of any such instrument or undertaking."
Extract from a Resolution of the Board of Directors of SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
and of GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA adopted July 28, 1970.
"On any certificate executed by the Secretary or an assistant secretary of the Company setting out, (i) The provisions of Article V, Section 13 of the By-Laws, and
(ii) A copy of the power-of-attomey appointment, executed pursuant thereto, and
(iii) Certifying that said power.-of-attomey appointment is in full force and effect,
the signature of the certifying officer may be by facsimile, ancl the seal of the Company may be a facsimile thereof."
I, R.A. Pierson, Secretary of SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and of GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, do hereby certify that the
foregoing extracts of the By-Laws and of a Resolution of the Board of Directors of these corporations, and of a Power of Attorney issued pursuant thereto, are true and
correct, and that both the By-Laws, the Resolution and the Power of Attomey are still in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the facsimile seal of said corporation
this 31St day of AUgUSt 1999
OF WAS~
R.A. PIERSON, SECRETARY
S-0974/SAEF 7/98
® Registered trademark of SAFECO Corporation
6/11/99 PDF
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of o~ -.~
Date
personally appeared
Nametsl of S~gner(s)
l~-personally known to me
~ proved to me on the basis
evidence
of satisfactory
Notary Public - California
to be the person/ref~hose name,(.s-F is/~af-e--
subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/~he/tl,ey executed
the same in his/har/thoir, authorized
capacity(j~9-)T and that by his/.her/thc,iP
signatur~n the instrument the persoNda')gar
the entity upon behalf of which the perso~
acted, executed the instrument.
PFace Notary Seal Above
WITNESS m~~12 ,~seal.
OPTIONAL
Though the information be/ow is not required by/aw, it may prove valuab/e to persons re/ying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Document Date: ~1/'" c:~(//f f'¢' Number of Pages:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Si ner
Signer's Name: '7'/~ !~
Individual
Corporate Officer -- Title(s):
Partner- ~. Limited , General
'~Attorney in Fact
Trustee
Guardian or Conservator
Other:
~;13 of tr~umb here
Signer Is Representing:
· 997 Nahonal Notary AssoQation · 9350 De Soto Ave P O 8c~ 2-'52 · Chatsworth CA 91313 2402 Prod No 5907 z'eorcer Carl Toil-Free 1-800-876~6827
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE
PROJECT NO. PW97-03
WINCHESTER ~ 15 OFF-RAMP WIDENING
all materials, supplies, labor, services, I
CONTRACTOR or by any of the CONTRACTOR's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in
contribution to the execution of it's contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building,
erection, construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as PROJECT NO.
PW97-03, WINCHESTER L~ 15 OFF-RAMP WIDENING, situated in the City of Temecula, State of
California, more particularly described as follows:
WINCHESTER ~ 15 OFF-RAMP WIDENING
The CONTRACTOR declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said
Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any
unpaid sums owing to the CONTRACTOR.
Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the CONTRACTOR hereby
disputes the following amounts:
Description
Dollar Amount to Dispute
Pursuant to Public Contracts Code {}7200, the CONTRACTOR does hereby fully release and
acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any
and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the
CONTRACTOR by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contact amount which the
CONTRACTOR has not disputed above.
Dated:
'~ ~,zt~'~ By:
/
CONT ACTOR
pS;~nj Ti~,~iiV
r:\cip\projccts\pw97Xpw97-03\bid-clo¢ 1 .cry
RELEASE R-1
ITEM 12
APPRO~
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
September 14, 1999
Acceptance of Park Landscape Bonds and Agreement for Tract No.
28510-1: Woodside Chantemar, Inc. (North General Kearny Road
at Margarita Road)
PREPARED BY:
W~-:"~\Beryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Accept the agreement and surety bonds from Woodside Chantemar, Inc. to improve the park
site within Tract No. 28510-1.
BACKGROUND: Pursuant to the conditions of approval for Tract No. 28510-1, the
developer is proposing to improve and dedicate a 3.15 acre neighborhood park facility to the
City. The future park site, named Long Canyon Creek Park, is located on the south side of
North General Kearny Road, east of Margarita Road.
To insure that the future park facility is constructed to City standards, the developer is required
to post security to improve these areas based upon the approved landscape/irrigation plans and
the certified construction cost estimates for the improvements.
As a result, Woodside Chantemar, Inc. has entered into an agreement with the City and has
provided surety bonds, issued by American Motorists Insurance Company, as follows:
Long Canyon Creek Park
Tract No. 28510-1:
1. AMIC Faithful Performance Bond No. 3SM 958 201 00 the amount of ,~412,698.00.
2. AMIC Labor and Materials Bond No. 3SM 958 201 00 in the amount of 9206,349.00.
Upon completion and acceptance of the improvements by the City Council, staff will
recommend the appropriate release or reduction of the bonds.
r:\yasinobk\28510.landecapebond 081099
FISCAL IMPACT:
be borne by the developer.
ATTACHMENTS:
None. The cost of construction for the perimeter slope area will
Agreement/Bonds.
r: \yasinobk\28510. landscapebond 081099
CITY OF TEMECULA
PARKI,AND / LANDSCAPE 1MPROVEMKNT AGREEMY'aNT
DATE OF AGREE/vfli~NT: July 20, 1999
NAME OF SUBDIVIDER: Woodside Chantemar, Inc.
(Referred to as "SUBDIVIDER")
NAME OF SUBDIVISION: Campos Verdes
(Referred to as "SUBDIVIDER")
TRACT NO.: 2 8 5 10. - 1 3,15 acre PARK
TENTATIVE MAP RESOLUTION
OF APPROVAL NO.: PA98- 0323
(Referred to as "Resolution of Approval")
PARKLAND IMPROVEMENT PLANS NO.: CSD 99-005
(Referred to as "Resolution of Approval")
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF PARKLAND IMPROVF~IENTS: S 41 2,698.00
COMPLETION DATE: Apri ] 2000
NAME OF SURETY AND BOND NO. FOR LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND:
Ameri can Mnt-ori stS Insurance Co. ~SI~A I~'~5 7_0 I O0
NAME OF SURETY AND BOND NO. FOR FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND:
Ameri can Motori sts Insurance Co, ,','~-.~M, qg~ b I O O
NAME OF SURETY AND BOND NO. FOR WARRANTY BOND: -- ~//A
Am~-r~can Motorists Insurance Co,
File: R:~8~CONTRACTSM..NOSCAPE.AGR
This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the City of Temecula, California,
a Municipal Corporation of the State of California. hereinafter referred to as CITY, and the
SUBDIVIDE.
RECITALS
A. SUBDIVIDER has presented to CITY for approval and recordation, a final
subdivision map of a proposed subdivision pursuant to provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of
the State of California and the CITY ordinances and regulations relating to the f~ing, approval
and recordation of subdivision maps. The Subdivision Map Act and the CITY ordinances and
regulations relating to the filing, approval and recordation of subdivision maps are collectively
referred to in this Agreement as the "Subdivision Laws."
B. A tentative map of the SUBDIVISION has been approved, subject to the
Subdivision I.~ws and to the requirements and conditior~s contained in the Resolution of Approval.
The Resolution of Approval is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and is incorporated into this
Agreement by reference.
C. SUBDIVIDER is required as a condition of the approval of the tentative map that
the Parkland Improvement plans must be completed, in compliance with City standards, by the
Completion Date. The Subdivision Laws establish as a condition precedent to the approval of a
final map, that the SUBDIVIDER has entered into a secured Agreement with the CITY to
complete the Parkland/l-qndscape Improvement Plans within the Completion Date.
D. In consideration of approval of a final map for the SUBDIVISION by the City
Council, SUBDIVIDER desires to enter into this Agreement, whereby promises to install and
complete, at SUBDIVIDER'S own expense, all the Parkland/Landscape Improvement work
requLre..d by City in connection with proposed subdivision. Subdivider has secured this agreement
File: R:',B:CONTRACTS~LNDSCAI~.AGR 2
by Parkland/Landscaping Improvement Security required by the Subdivision Laws and approved
by the City Attorney. The term "Parkland" includes landscape areas intended to be maintained
by the Temecula Community Services District.
E. Complete Parkland/Landscape Improvement Plans for the construction. installation
and completion of the Parkland Improvements have been prepared by SUBDIVIDER and
approved by the Director of Community Services. The Parkland Improvement Plans numbered
as referenced previously in this Agreement are on file in the Office of the Director of Community
Services and are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. All references in this
Agreement to the Parkland Improvement Plans shall include reference to any specifications for
the Improvements as approved by the Director of Community Services.
F. An estimate of the cost for construction of the Parkland Improvements according
to the Improvement Plans has been made and approved by the Director of Community Services.
The estimated amount is stated on Page 1 of this Agreement. The basis for the estimate is
attached as Exhibit "A" to this Agreement.
G. The CITY has adopted standards for the construction and installation of
Parkland/Landscape Improvements within the CITY. The Parkland/Landscape Improvement
Plans have been prepared in conformance with the CITY standards, (in effect on the date of
approval of the Resolution of Approval).
H. SUBDIVIDER recognizes that by approval of the final map for SUBDIVISION,
CITY has conferred substantial fights upon SUBDIVIDER, including the fight to sell, lease, or
finance lots within the SUBDIVISION, and has taken the final act necessary to subdivide the
property within the SUBDM SION. As a result, CITY will be damaged to the extent of the cost
of installation of the Parkland/Landscape Improvements by SUBDIVIDER'S failure to perform
File: R:XB~CONTRACTSXI..NDSCAPE.AGR ~
its obligations under this Agreement, including, but not limited to, SUBDIVIDER'S obligation
to complete construction of Parkland/Landscape Improvements by the Completion Date. CITY
shall be entitled to all remedies available to it pursuant to this Agreement and the Subdivision
Laws in the event of a default by SUBDIVIDER. It is specifically recognized that the
determination of whether a reversion to acreage or rescission of the SUBDIVISION constitutes
an adequate remedy for default by the SUBDIVIDER shall be within the sole discretion of CITY.
NOW, TIq'h"REFORE, in consideration of the approval and recordation by the City Council
of the final map of the SUBDIVISION, SUBDIVIDER and CITY agree as follows;
1. SU~DIVIDER'S Obligations to Construct Parkland/Landscape Improvements.
SUBDIVIDER Shall:
Comply with all the requirements of the Resolution of Approval,
amendments thereto, and with the provisions of the Subdivision
ae
and any
Laws.
b.
Complete by the time established in Section 20 of this Agreement
and at SUBDIVIDER'S own expense. all the Parkland/Landscape Improvement
Work required on the Tentative Map and Resolution of Approval in conformance
with the Parkland Improvement Plans and the CITY standards:
c. Furnish the necessary materials for completion of the Parkland
Improvements in conformity with the Parkland Improvement Plans and CITY
standards.
d. Except for easements or other interests in real property to be
dedicated to the homeowners association of the SUBDIVISION, acquire and
dedicate, or pay the cost of acquisition by CITY, of aH fights-of-way, easements
File: R:XRXCONTRACTS\LNDSCAI~.AGR 4
and other interests in real property for construction or installation of the
Parkland/Landscape Improvements, free and clear of all Hens and encumbrances
for the SUBDIVIDER'S obligations with regard to acquisition by CITY of off-site
fights-of-way, easements and other interests in real property shall be subject to a
separate Agreement between SUBDIVIDER and CITY.
2. Accluisition and Dedication of F-qsements or Rights-of-Way. If any of the
Parkland/Landscape Improvements and land development work contemplated by this Agreement
are to be constructed or installed on land not owned by SUBDIVIDER, no construction or
installation shall be commenced before:
a. The offer of dedication to CITY or appropriate fights-of-way,
easements or other interest in real property, and appropriate authorization from the
property owner to allow construction or installation of the Improvements or work,
Or
b. The dedication to, and acceptance by, the CITY of appropriate
rights-of-way, easements or other interests in real property, and approved by the
Department of Public Works. as determined by the Director of Community
Services.
c. The issuance by a court of competent jurisdiction pursuant to the
State Eminent Domain Law of an order of possession. SUBDIVIDER shall
comply in all respects with order of possession.
Nothing in this Section 2 shall be construed as authorizing or granting an extension of time to
SUBDIVIDER.
3. Security. SUBDIVIDER shall at all times guarantee SUBDIVIDER'S performance
File: R:\B~CONTRACTS'~LNDSCAPE.AGR 5
of this Agreement by furnishing to CITY, and maintaining, good and sufficient security as
required by the Subdivision Laws on forms approved by CITY for the purposes and in the
mounts as fol/ows:
a. to assure faithful performance of this Agreement in regard to said
improvements in and amount of 100% of the estimated cost of the
Parkland/Landscape Improvements; and
b. to secure payment to any contractor, subcontractor, persons renting
equipment, or furnishing labor materials for Parkland/Landscape Improvements
required to be constructed or installed pursuant to this Agreement in the additional
amount of 50 % of the estimated cost of the Improvements; and
c. to guarantee or warranty the work done pursuant to this Agreement
for a period of one year following acceptance thereof by CITY against any
defective work or labor done or defective materials fumished in the additional
amount of 10% of the estimated cost of the Parkland Improvements.
The securities required by this Agreement shall be kept on fide with the City Clerk. The terms
of the security documents referenced on Page I of this Agreement are incorporated into this
Agreement by this Reference. If any security is replaced by another approved security, the
replacement shall be tided with the City Clerk and, upon F~ing, shall be deemed to have been
made a part of and incorporated into this Agreement. Upon filing of a replacement security with
the City Clerk, the former security may be released.
4. Alterations to Parkland Improvement Plans.
a. Any changes, alterations or additions to the Parkland/Landscape
Improvement Plans and specifications or to the improvements, not exceeding 10%
File: R:\B\CONTRACTS%LNDSCAP~.AGR 6
of the original estimated cost if the improvement, which are mutually agreed upon
by the CITY and SUBDIVIDER. shall not relieve the improvement security given
for faithful performance of this Agreement. In the event such changes. alterations,
or additions exceed 10% of the original estimated cost of the improvement,
SUBDIVIDER shall provide improvement security for faithful performance as
required by Paragraph 3 of this Agreement for 100 % of the total estimated cost of
the improvement as changed. altered, or amended, minus any completed partial
releases allowed by Paragraph 6 of this Agreement.
b. The SUBDIVIDER shall construct the Parkland Improvements in
accordance with the CITY Standards in effect at the time of adoption of the
Resolution of Approval. CITY reserves the right to modify the standards
applicable to the SUBDIVISION and this Agreement, when necessary, to protect
the public health, safety or welfare or comply with applicable State or federal law
or CITY zoning ordinances. If SUBDIVIDER requests and is granted an extension
of time for completion of the improvements. CITY may apply the standards in
effect at the time of the extension.
5. Inspection and Maintenance Period.
a. SUBDIVIDER shall obtain City inspection of the
Parkland/Landscape Improvements in accordance with the City standards in effect at the time of
adoption of the Resolution of Approval. SUBDIVIDER shall at all times maintain proper facilities
and safe access for inspection of the Parkland Improvements by CITY inspectors and to the shops
wherein any work is in preparation. Upon completion of the work the SUBDIVIDER may
request a final inspection by the Director of Community Services, or the Director of Community
File: R: B\CONTRACTS\I,,NDSCAPE.AGR
Service 's authorized representative. If the Director of Community Services, or the designated
representative. determine that the work has been completed in accordance with this Agreement.
then the Director of Community
Services shall certify the completion of the Parkland/Landscape Improvements to
the Board of Directors.
b. SUBDIVIDER shall continue to maintain the Parkland/l-qndscape
Improvements for ninety (90) days after they have been certified completed. No
improvements shall be f'mally accepted unless the maintenance period has expired.
and all aspects of the work have been inspected and determined to have been
completed in accordance with the Parkland/Landscape Improvement Plans and
CITY standards.
certification.
6. Release of Securities.
SUBDIVIDER shah bear aH costs of inspection and
Subject to approval by the Board of Directors of the
Community Services District of the CITY, the securities required by this Agreement shah be
released as follows:
a. Security given for faithful performance of any act, obligation. work
or Agreement shall be released upon the expiration of the maintenance period and
the final completion and acceptance of the act or work, subject to the provisions
of subsection (b) hereof.
b. The Director of Community Services may release a portion of the
security given for faithful performance of improvement work as the Parkland
Improvement progresses upon application therefore by the SUBDIVIDE:
File: R:%B%CONTI=~ACTS"VJNIDSCAP~.AGR ~
provided. however, that no such release shall be for an amount less that 25 % of the
total Parkland Improvement Security given for faithful performance of the
improvement work and that the security shall not be reduced to an amount less than
50% of the total Landscape/Parkland Improvement Security given for faithful
performance until expiration of the maintenance period and f'mai completion and
acceptance of the improvement work. In no event shall the Director of Community
Services authorize a release of the Parkland/Landscape Improvement Security
which would reduce such security to an amount below that required to guarantee
the completion of the improvement work and any other obligation imposed by this
Agreement.
c. Security given to secure payment to the contractor, his or her
subcontractors and to persons furnishing labor, materials or equipment shall, six
months after the completion and acceptance of the work, be reduced to an amount
equal to the total claimed by all claimants for whom lien have been flied and of
which notice has been given to the legislative body, plus an amount masonably
determined by the Director of Community Services to be required to assure the
performance of any other obligations secured by the Security. The balance of the
security shall be released upon the settlement of all claims and obligations for
which the security was given.
d. No security given for the guarantee or warranty of work shall be
released until the expiration of the warranty period and until any claims fried
during the warranty period have been settled. As provided in paragraph 10, the
warranty period shall not commence until final acceptance of all work and
File: R:~B\CONTRACTS~LNDSCAPE.AGR 9
improvements by the City Council.
e. The CITY may retain from any security released, and amount
sufficient to cover costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable
attorneys' fees.
7. Injury to Public Improvements. Public Property or Public Utilities Facilities.
SUBDIVIDER shall replace or have replaced, or repair or have repaired. as the case may be, all
public improvements, public utilities facilities and surveying or subdivision monuments which are
destroyed or damaged or destroyed by reason of any work done under this Agreement.
SUBDIVIDER shall bear the entire cost of replacment or repairs of any and all public property
on public utility property damaged or destroyed by reason of any work done. Under this
agreement whether such property is owned by the United States or any agency thereof, or the State
of California, or any agency or political subdivision thereof, or by the CITY or any public or
private utility corporation or by any combination or such owners. Any repair or replacement shall
be to the satisfaction, and subject to the approval, of the City Engineer.
8. Permits. SUBDIVIDER shall, at SUBDIVIDER"S expense, obtain all necessary
permits and licenses for the construction and installation of the improvements, give all necessary
notices and pay all fees and taxes required by law.
9. Default of SUEDIVIDFR.
a. Default of SUBDIVIDER shall include. but not be limited to,
SUBDIVIDER'S failure to timely commence construction pursuant to this
Agreement; SUBDIVIDER'S failure to timely complete construction of the
File: R:~B~CONTRACTS'~LNDSCAPI=.AGR l ()
Parkland/Landscape Improvements; SUBDIVIDER'S failure to timely cure any
defect in the Parkland/Landscape Improvements: SUBDIVIDER'S failure to
perform substantial construction work for a period of 20 calendar days after
commencement of the work; SUBDIVIDER'S insolvency, appointment of a
receiver. or the filing of any petition in bankruptcy either voluntary or involuntary
which SUBDIVIDER fails to discharge within thirty (30) days; the commencement
of a foreclosure action against the SUBDIVISION or a portion thereof, or any
conveyance in lieu or in avoidance of foreclosure; or SUBDIVIDER's failure to
perform anv other obligation under this Agreement.
b. The CITY reserves to itself all remedies available to it at law or
in equity for breach of SUBDIVIDER's obligations under this Agreement. The
CITY shall have the right, subject to this section, to draw upon or utilize the
appropriate security to mitigate CITY damages in event of default by
SUBDIVIDER. The right of CITY to draw upon or utilize the security is
additional to and not in lieu of any other remedy available to CITY. It is
specifically recognized that the estimated costs and security amounts may not
reflect the actual cost of construction or installation of Parkland/Landscape
Improvements and, therefore, CITY damages for SUBDIVIDER'S default shall be
measured by the cost of completing the required improvements. The sums
provided by the improvement security may be used by CITY for the completion of
the Parkland/Landscape Improvements in accordance with the Parkland/Landscape
Improvement Plans and specifications contained herein.
In the event of SUBDIVIDER'S default under this Agreement. SUBDIVIDER
File: ~q ~- CONTRACTSXUNDSCAPE.AGR 1 I
authorizes CITY to perform such obligation twenty days after mailing written
notice of default to SUBDIVIDER and to SUBDIVIDER'S Surety, and agrees to
pay the entire cost of such performance by CITY.
CITY may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion, by contract
or by any other method CITY may deem advisable, for the account and at the
expense of SUBDIVIDER, and SUBDIVIDER'S Surety shall be liable to CITY
for any excess cost or damages occasioned CITY thereby; and. in such event,
CITY, without liability for so doing, may take possession of, and utilize in
completing the work. such materials. appliances. plant and other property
belonging to SUBDIVIDER as may be on the site of the work and necessary. for
performance of the work.
c. Failure of SUBDIVIDER to comply with the terms of this
Agreement shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a notice of violation
against all the lots in the SUBDIVISION, or to rescind the approval or otherwise
revert the SUBDIVISION to acreage. The remedy provided by this Subsection C
is in addition to and not in lieu of other remedies available to CITY.
SUBDIVIDER agrees that the choice of remedy or remedies for SUBDIVIDER'S
breach shall be in the discretion of CITY.
d. In the event that SUBDIVIDER fails to perform any obligation
hemunder, SUBDIVIDER agrees to pay all costs and expenses incurred by CITY
in securing performance of such obligations. including costs of suit and reasonable
attorney's fees.
e. The failure of CITY to take an enforcement action with respect to
File: R:%B\CONTRACTS',LNDSCApE.AGR 12
a default. or to declare a breach, shall not be construed as a waiver of that default
or breach or any subsequent default or breach of SUBDIVIDER.
10. Warranty. SUBDIVIDER shall guarantee or warranty the work done pursuant
to this Agreement for a period of one year after expiration of the maintenance period and f'mal
acceptance by the City. Council of the work and improvements against any defective work or labor
done or defective materials furnished. Where ParklanckLandscape Improvements are to be
constructed in phases or sections, the one year warranty period shall commence after City
acceptance of the last completed improvement. If within the warranty period any work or
improvement or part of any work or improvement done. furnished. installed. constructed or
caused to be done, furnished, installed or constructed by SUBDIVIDER fails to fulf~l any of the
requirements of this &re'cement or the Parkland/Landscape Improvement Plans and specifications
referred to herein. SUBDIVIDER shall without delay and without any cost to CITY, repair or
replace or reconstruct any defective or otherwise unsatisfactory part or parts of the work or
structure. Should SUBDIVIDER fail to act promptly or in accordance with this requirement.
SUBDIVIDER hereby authorizes CITY, at CITY option. to perform the work twenty days after
mailing written notice of default to SUBDIVIDER and to SUBDIVIDER's Surety and agrees to
pay the cost of such work by CITY. Should CITY determine that an urgency requires repairs or
replacements to be made before SUBDIVIDER can be notified. CITY may, in its sole discretion,
make the necessary repairs or replacements or perform the necessary work and SUBDIVIDER
shall pay to CITY the cost of such repairs.
11. SU~DIVIDER Not Agent of CITY. Neither SUBDIVIDER nor any of
SUBDIVIDER'S agents or contractors are or shall be considered to be agents of CITY in
connection with the performance of SUBDIVIDER'S obligations under this Agreement.
File: R:XBXCONTRACTS~J.,NDSCAPE.AGR I 3
12. Ir0ury to Work. Until such time as the Parldand/lnndscape Improvements are
accepted by CITY, SUBDIVIDER shah be responsible for and bear the risk of loss to any of the
improvements constructed or installed. CITY shall not, nor shall any officer or employee thereof,
be liable or responsible for any accident, loss or damage, regardless of cause, happening or
occurring to the work or improvements specified in this Agreement prior to the completion and
acceptance of the work or improvements. All such risks shall be the responsibility of and are
hereby assumed by SUBDIVIDER.
13. Other Agreements. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall preclude CITY
from expending monies pursuant to agreements concurrently or previously executed between the
parties. or from entering into agreement with other subdividers for the apportionment of costs of
water and sewer mains, or other improvements, pursuant to the provisions of the CITY ordinances
providing therefore, nor shall anything in this Agreement commit CITY to any such
apportionment.
14. SITRDIVIDF. R'S Obligation to Warn Public During Construction. Until final
acceptance of the Parkland Improvements. SUBDIVIDER shall give good and adequate warning
to the public of each and every. dangerous condition existent in said improvements, and will take
all reasonable actions to protect the public from such dangerous condition.
15. Vesting of Ownership. Upon acceptance of work on behalf of CITY and
recordation of the Notice of Completion, ownership of the improvements constructed pursuant to
this Agreement shall vest in CITY.
16. Final Acceptance of Work. Acceptance of the work on behalf of CITY shall be
made bv the City Council upon recommendation of the Director of Community Services after final
completion and inspection of all Parkland/Landscape Improvements. The Board of Directors shall
F,te: R:\B CONTRACTS'~..ND,SCAPE.AGR 14
act upon the Director of Community Ser,,,ices recommendations within thirty (30) days from the
date the Director of Community Services certifies that the work has finally completed, as provided
in Paragraph 5. Such acceptance shall not constitute a waiver of defects by CITY.
17. Indemnity/Hold Hamless. CITY or any officer or employee thereof shall not be
liable for any injury to persons or property occasioneel by reason of the acts or omissions of
SUBDIVIDER, its agents or employees in the performance of this Agreement. SUBDIVIDER
further agrees to protect and hold harmless CITY, its officials and employees from any and all
claims. demands, causes of action, liability or loss of any sort, because of. or arising out of. acts
or omissions or SUBDIVIDER, its agents or employees in the performance of this Agreement,
including all claims, demands, causes of action, liability, or loss because of. or arising out of, in
whole or in part, the design or construction of the Parkland/lnndscape Improvements. This
indemnification and Agreement to hold harmless shall extend to injuries to persons and damages
or taking of property resulting from the design or construction of the Parkland/Landscape
Improvements as provided herein, and in addition, to adjacent property owners as a consequence
of the diversion of waters from the design or construction of public drainage systems. streets and
other public improvements. Acceptance of any of the Parkland/Landscape Improvements shall
not constitute any assumption by the CITY of any responsibility for any damage or taking covered
by this paragraph. CITY shall not be responsible for the design or construction of the
Parkland/Landscape Improvements pursuant to the approved Parkland/Landscape Improvement
Plans, regardless of any negligent action or inaction taken by the CITY in approving the plans,
unless the particular improvement design was specifically required by CITY over written objection
by SUBDIVIDER submitted to the Director of Community Services before approval of the
File: R:~B\CONTRACTSXI..NDSCAPE.AGR 15
particular improvement design, which objection indicated that the particular improvement design
was dangerous or defective and suggested an alternative safe and feasible design. After acceptance
of the Parkland/Landscape Improvements, the SUBDIVIDER shall remain obligated to eliminate
any defect in design or dangerous condition caused by the design or construction defect, however,
SUBDIVIDER shall not be responsible for routine maintenance. Provisions of this paragraph shall
remain in full force and effect for ten years following the acceptance by the CITY of
Parkland/Landscape Improvements. It is the intent of this section that SUBDIVIDER shall be
responsible for all liability for design and construction of the Parkland/landscape Improvements
installed or work done pursuant to this Agreement and that CITY shall not be liable for any
negligence. nonfeasance, misfeasance or malfeasance in approving, reviewing, checking, or
correcting any plans or specifications or in approving, reviewing or inspecting any work or
The improvement security shall not be required to cover the provision of this
construction.
paragraph.
18.
Sale or Disposition of SURDIVISION. Sale or other disposition of this property
will not relieve SUBDIVIDER from the obligations set forth herein. If SUBDIVIDER sells the
property or any portion of the property within the SUBDIVISION to any other person. the
SUBDIVIDER may request a novadon of this Agreement and a substitution of security. Upon
approval of the novadon and substitution of securities, the SUBDIVIDER may request a release
or reduction of the securities required by this Agreement. Nothing in the novadon shall relieve
the SUBDIVIDER of the obligations under Paragraph 17 for the work or improvement done by
SUBDIVIDE.
19. Time of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.
20. Time for Completion of Work Extensions. SUBDIVIDE shall complete
File: R:XBt, CONTRACTS'~J,,NDSCAPE.AGR 16
construction of the improvements required by this Agreement no later than
· In the event good cause exists as determined by the City Engineer, and ff otherwise permitted
under the tentative map condition, the time for completion of the improvements hereunder may
be extended. The extension shall be made by writing executed by the Director of Community.
Services. Any such extension may be granted without notice to SLrBDIVIDER'S Surety and shall
not affect the validity of this Agreement or release the Surety or Sureties on any security given
for this Agreement. The Director of Community Services shall be the sole and final judge as to
whether or not good cause has been shown to entitle SUBDIVIDE to an extension. Delay, other
than delay in the commencement of work, resulting from an act of CITY, or by an act of God.
which SUBDIVIDE could not have reasonably foreseen. or by storm or inclement weather which
prevents the conducting of work, or by strikes, boycotts. similar actions by employees or labor
organizations. which prevent the conducting or work. and which were not caused by or
contributed to by SUBDIVIDE, shall constitute good cause for
an extension of time for completion. As a condition of such extension. the Director of
Community Services may require SUBDIVIDE to fumish new security guaranteeing
performance of this Agreement as extended in an increased mount as necessary to compensate
for any increase in construction costs as determined by the Director of Community Services.
21. No Vesting of Rights. Performance by SUBDIVIDE of this Agreement
shall not be construed to vest SUBDIVIDER'S fights with respect to any change in any change
in any zoning or building law or ordinance.
22. NoticeS. All notices required or provided for under this Agreement shall be
File: R:\B CONTRACTSXLNOSCAPIE.AGR l 7
in writing and delivered in person or sent by marl, postage prepaid and addressed as provided in
this Section. Notice shall be effective on the date it is delivered in person, or, if mailed, on the
date of deposit in the United States Mail. Notices shah be addressed as follows unless a written
change of address is fled with the City:
Notice to CITY:
City. Clerk
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Notice to SUBDIVIDE:
Woodside Chatemar, Inc.
c/o Woodside Homes of California,
Attn: Nate Pugsley
23121 Antonio Pkwy., Ste. 120
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
23. Severability. The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any portion of
this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect unless amended or modified by the mutual consent
of the parties.
24. Captions. The captions of this Agreement are for convenience and reference
only and shall not define, explain, modify, limit, exemplify, or aid in the interpretation,
construction or meaning of any provisions of this Agreement.
25. litigation or Arbitration. In the event that suit or arbitration is brought to
enforce the terms of this contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to litigation costs and
reasonable attorney's fees.
File: R:~B~CONTRACTSXLNDSCAPE.AGR l 8
26. Incorporation of Recitals.
into the terms of this agreement.
27. Entire Agreement.
The reciml~ to this agreement are hereby incorporated
This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement of the
pardes with respect to the subject matter. All modifications, amendments, or waivers of the terms
of this Agreement must be in writing and signed by the appropriate representative of the panics.
In the case of the CITY, the appropriate party shall be the City Manager.
File: R:~B~CONTRACTSXLNOSCAP~.AGR 19
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed by CITY, by and through its Mayor.
Name: Nate
Title: Asst. Sec.
By:
Name: Tim McGinnis
Title: Sr. V.P.
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
steven J. Ford, Mayor
(Proper Notarization of SUBDIVIDER'S signature
is required and shall be attached)
ATTEST:
By:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
RECO1VINIENDED FOR APPROVAL:
By:
William G. Hughes
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
By:
Name:
Herman D. Parker
Director of Community Services
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Peter Thorson
City Attorney
FiFe: R:~B%CONTRACTS'&ND,SCAPE.AGR 20
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
NEIGHBORHOOD PARK
CAMPOS VERDES PLANNING AREA 1
WOODSIDE HOMES
July 21, 1999
Prepared by Alaa Chaabani, Landscape Planner
JN15-0401367.001
Item
Number
1
2
3
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Description Quantity Unit
Grade site (import fill) 15,500 CUYD
Construct concrete swale 150 LF
Demo. Existing curb & 1 LS
sidewalk
Construct new curb cut & 2 EA
sidewalk
Construct 6" PCC curb 240 LF
Construct 6" PCC curb and 240 LF
gutter
Construct 3" AC pavement 7,570 SF
over 6" class II base
Construct HC ramp 1 LS
Construct parking lot, HC 1 LS
parking sign and stripe
Construct PCC pavement
Construct
Construct
Construct
Construct
Tot Lot sub-drain
PCC Tot Lot edge
HC play surface
play equipment
Place washed plaster sand
Install prefabricated picnic
table covers
Install precast concrete
picnic tables
14,442
1
310
1,360
1
1
2
SF
LS
LF
SF
LS
LS
EA
EA
Item Cost
$1.5o
$1o.oo
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
$8.00
$10.00
$1.50
$250.00
$1,500.00
$4.00
$2,OOO.OO
$25.00
$15.00
$57,250.O0
$2,20O.OO
$3,500.00
$1,000.00
Total
$23,250.00
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
$3,000.00
$1,920.00
$2,400.00
$11,355.00
$250.00
$1,500.00
$57,768.00
$2,000.00
$7,750.00
$20,400.00
$57,250.00
$2,200.00
$7,000.00
$5,000.00
18 Install cast metal BBQ 5 EA $500.00 $2,500.00
Item
Number
19
Description Quantity Unit
Install precast concrete 1 EA
drinking fountain
20 Tube steel fence and gates 1,085 LF $25.00 $27,125.00
21 Recycled plastic split rail 260 LF $15.00 $3,900.00
fence
Construct electric meter and 1 LS
lighting at picnic tables
23 Install water meter 1 LS $2,000.00 $2,000.00
24 Install backflow preventer 2 LS $2,000.00 $4,000.00
25 Install irrigation controller 1 LS $8,800.00 $8,800.00
26 Construct spray irrigation 115300 SF $0.50 $57,650.00
system
27 Soil preparation 115300 SF $0.15 $17,295.00
28 Install trees - 15 gal. 76 EA $85.00 $6,460.00
29 Install shrubs - 1 gal. 99 EA $7.00 $693.00
30 Ground cover from flats 19,348 SF $0.35 $6,771.73
31 Hydroseed tuff 96,000 SF $0.10 $9,600.00
32 90 day plant establishment 1 LS $3,500.00 $3,500.00
33 10% Professional Design Fee 1 LS $25,000.00 $25,000.00
Subtotal: $389,337.73
6% Contingency: $23,360.26
TOTAL: $412,698.00
Item Cost Total
$500.00 $500.00
22 $7,500.00 $7,500.00
Since ENGINEER has no control over labor, materials, equipment or services furnished by others or over the
Contractor(s)' method of determining prices, or over the competive bidding or market conditions, its opinions of probable
Project Cost and Construction Cost provided herein are to be made on the basis of its experience and quailifications and
represents its best judgment as an experienced and qualified professional engineer, familiar with the construction industry;
but ENGINEER cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual Project or Construction Cost will not vary
from its opinion of probable cost. If prior to the Bidding or Negotiating Phase, OWNER wishes greater assurance as a to
Project Cost, it shall employ an independent cost estimator. ~
Approved by:
II:\GRPIOXPDATA\OFFICL~WPWINxJOBpLXLANDSCpEM01567CM.VRD~park~v2.wtxl
~F'CA~.\~
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of ORANGE } ss.
On '7 ' Z~- ~fl , before me, Rochelle M. Sromalla, Notary Publi~
Date Name ancl Title of Officer (e.g., "Jane Doe. Notary Public')
f
x personally known to me
Z proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence
subscribed to the t
capacitg:(jS'_~'D and that by -his//p.~~
signatureL~on the instrument the perso~ or
~~,~,~z~ the entity upon behalf of which the person~
~ ~ seal.
Place Nota~ Seal Above
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not re~yuired by law. it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document:
Document Date:
Number of Pages:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer
Signer's Name: Individual
Corporate Officer -- Title(s):
Partner- ~ Limited ~_ General
Attorney in Fact
Trustee
Guardian or Conservator
Other:
Signer Is Representing:
1997 Nalional Notary Association · 9350 De Soto Ave.. PO, Box 2402 · Chatsworth. CA 91313-2402 Prod. No. 5907 Reof0er: Call Toll-Free 1-800-876-6827
Bond Number: 3SM 958 201 00
Premium:$3,302.00/Two Years
CFfYOFTENIECLTLAFirst Term Premium Fully Earned
PARKLAND/LANDSCAPE FAIItSIJL PERFORMANCE BOND
IArHEP, EAS, the City of Temecula, State of California, and Wr~c,d-~i ap Chant, ernest,
(hereinat~er designated as "Principal") have entered into an Agreement
whereby Principal agrees to install and complete certain parkland Improvemems, which said
Agreerent, dated July I~4 19~lq , and identified as Project Tract 285,10-1
3,15 acre PARK , is hereby referred to and made a part hereof, and
WI-IF-R.EAS, Principal is required under the terms ofthe Agreement to furnish a bond for
the Faithful Performance of the Agreemere;
American MOtoristS InsuranCe
NOW, TtF_REFORE, we the Principal and as surety, ac~gnE~dy
and firmly bound umo the City of Temecula, California, in the penal sum of $ 4 12,6 9 8.0 0 ,
(Four Hundred Twelve Thousand Six Hundred Ninety Eight and No/100ths)
lawful money of the United States, for the payment of such sum well and truly to be made, we
bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally.
The condition of this obligation is such that the obligation shall become null and void if the
above-bounded Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns, shall in
all things stand to, abide by, well and truly k~p, and perform the covenants, conditions, and
provisions in the Agre~aent and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or tlmir
part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects
according to his or their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless the City.
of Temecula, its officers, agents, and employees, as therein stipulated; otherwise, this obligation
shall be and remain in full force and effect.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face mount specified
therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable
attomey's fees, incurred by City in successfuI!y enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs
and included in any judgment rendered.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or
addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the
specifications accompanying the same shall in anyway affect its obligations on this bond, and it
does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition m the
terms of the Agreement or the work or to the ~pecifications.
Ill
!IlC.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly execumd by the Principal and
Suretyabovcrnmed, on j.]y ~,1~ ,19.~q.~.
American Motorists Insurance Company
SLrP, ETY
Woodside Chantemar, Inc.
PRINCIPAL
BY:
Wil ~t. J. Shupper
Atto~ney-i'n-Fact
Nathan W,
Asst. Sec.
BY:
Tim McGinnis
.qr, V,P,
(TrrLE)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorsen
City
CALIFORNia ALL-PURPOsE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of Los An.aeles
On JUL 19 1999 before me, C. Clarkson, Notary Public,
NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER
personally appeared William J. Shupper
NAME OF SIGNER
IPersonally known to me - OR - I'1 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed
the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies),
and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the
""' '=~ :" ....' ............ instrument the person(s), or the entity upon
behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the
instrument.
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and
could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
[] INDIVIDUAL
[] CORPORATE OFFICER
TITLE(S)
Bond(s)
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED
[] GENERAL
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
TRUSTEE(S)
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER:
NUMBER OF PAGES
JUL Z 9
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)
American Motorists Insurance Company
SIGNER OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of ORANGE
ss.
On '7- l, c2-'~I , before me,
Date
personally appeared N~ th~ n W.
Rochelle M. Sromalla, Notary Public
Name and TiTle of Officer (e.g., "Jane DOe. Notary Public ')
p,q.~] ~ &Tim McGinnis ,
Xmezs) of Slgneqs)
_~ personally known to me
_' proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence
Place Notan/Seal
subscribed to the within i
acknowledged to me that he/she~xecuted
the same in his/he~ authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/he~
signature(s) on the instrument the pemon(s), or
the entity upon behalf of which the person(s)
OPTIONAL
Though the informat#on l}elow is not required by law. it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent removal ancl reattacnment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document:
Document Date:
Number of Pages:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer
Signer's Name:
2 Individual
_' Corporate Officer -- Title(s):
' Partner- .'" Limited _' General
' Attorney in Fact
_' Trustee
' Guardian or Conservator
' Other:
ToD or lhumD here
Signer Is Representing:
997 NatKxtal Notary A, ssocBbon · 9350 De Solo Ave.. P.O, Box 2402 · Chatsworm, CA 91313-2402 Prod, NO, 5907 Reorae~, Call Toll*Free 1-800-876-6827
Bond Number: 3SM 958 201 00
CITY OF TEM]ECULA
PA.P_KLANDILA. NDSC.kPE L--XBOR AND MATERIALS BONID
~]:-~S, the City of TcmccuiL Sum of California, and Woqdside Chantemar,
, (heremaker designated zs "Principal") have entered into an Agreement whereby
Principal agrees [o instrail and complete certain Ps. rkland Improvements. which stud Agreement.
daxed July 19- , 19 99~ and identifiexi as Projec: TR 28510-1 . 3.1_5
is hereby referred to and made a pan k_=reof: and
WI~RF_A.S. under the tenns of said Agreement. Principal is required before entering
upon the perform ace of the work. ,.o Fie a good and sufficient payment bond with the Cky of
Temecula. to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing with Section
3082] of Part ~ of Division 3 of the C'~vLt Code of the State of Cqlifomia: and
NOW, THEREFORE. we me mrincioal and as SuretT,
and fLrmly bound unto the City of Temecula. California, and all conuactots. subcontractors.
laborers, materialmen. and other vetsons employed in the performance of the a/oresaid
I;266,34'9 bo
Agreement and referred to in Title i5 of ;he C';vil Code, in the penal sum oi ~ , ! wful
(Two Hundred Six Thousand Three Hundred Forty Nine and No/i00ths)
money of the United States, for marefinis funUshed or labor thereon of any -kind. or for mounts
due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with red'peel to such work or labor, :hat Surety. wLH
pay the same in an mount uo~ exceeding thg mount set forth.
As a part of the obligaUon secured hereby and in addition to ~he face amoun~ specified
therefor, ther~ shall be included cosm and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable
attomey's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such oblig.~r. ion. all to be ~,ced
Irlc.
PARK
costs and included in any judgemen: rendered.
IL is hereby expressly stipulated and a~re-,,d that this bond shall insure to the benefit of
any and all persons, companies and corporations end:led to fijc claims unaer Title 15
(commencing with Section 3082) of Par~ ¢ of Division 3 of the C~v~ Cod6, so as to ~ve Ix right
of action to ~hem or :hei~ assigns in any suit brought upon this bond.
Lf the condition of this bond is fully performed, then this obligaUon shall become null and
void; otherwise. i~: shall be and remain in full force and effect.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time. Mteration or
addition co the terms of the Agreement or to the work to be performed :heraunder or the
speciz'~c=tions ~ccompzaying the same shall in anyway affect its obligations on this bond. and
it does hereby waive uodce of any such changes..-'xtension of time, .~ltcrution or addition to the
terms of ~he A~o'reement or :o the work or to the speci/icarions.
IN WITNESS ~OF, this instrumenc has been duly executed by me Principal ~d
Su~ above .~ed. 0n July I~/ , 1~.
(Se~)
AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANC~ COMPANY
W00DSIDE CHANTEMAR, INC.
PRINCEPAL
By:
Willianj
_At t ~ney~-Fa c ~'>.., :'
Crme)
Cn~)
By: ~~~'~'~""
Tim McGtnnis
Sr.
O~ae)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter ThoTson
Cky A~r. oraey
State of California
County of Los An.~eles
On -. ' · ':~:i'j before me, C. Clarkson, Notary Public,
NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER
personally appeared William J. ShuDDer
NAME OF SIGNER
[Personally known to me - OR - 1:3 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed
the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies),
~o=:, ....................- ........, .......,~.,o,,,,and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the
· -::: :,; instrument the person(s), or the entity upon
· ::~1 ~:
.- behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the
instrument.
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and
could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
[] INDIVIDUAL
[] CORPORATE OFFICER
TITLE(S)
Bond(s)
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED
F1
[] GENERAL
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
TRUSTEE(S)
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER:
NUMBER OF PAGES
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER 18 REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)
Amedcan Motorists Insurance Company
SIGNER OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
I 'emPeR.
Home Office: Long Grove, IL 60049
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Know All Men By These Presents:
That the Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, the Amedcan Motorists Insurance Company, and the American Manufacturers Mutual
Insurance Company, corporations organized and existing under the laws of the State of Ilinois, having their principal office in Long Grove,
Illinois, (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Company") do hereby appoint
William J. Shupper of Los Angeles, California
their true and lawful agent(s) and attorney(s)-in-fact, to make, execute, seal, and deliver dudrig the pedod beginning with the date of issuance
of this power and ending on the date specified below, unless sooner revoked for and on its behalf as surety, and as their act and deed:
Any and all bonds and undertakings.
EXCEPTION: NO AUTHORITY is granted to make, execute, seal and deliver any bond or undertaking which guarantees the payment or
collection of any promissory note, check, draft or letter of credit.
This authority does not permit the same obligation to be split into two or more bonds in order to bdng each such bond within the dollar limit
of authority as set forth herein.
This appointment may be revoked at any time by the Company.
The execution of such bonds and undertakings in pursuance of these presents shall be as binding upon the said Company as fully and amply
to all intents and purposes, as if the same had been duly executed and acknowledged by their regula~y elected officers at their principal office in
Long Grove, Illinois.
THIS APPOINTMENT SHALL CEASE AND TERMINATE WITHOUT NOTICE AS OF December 31, 2001
This Power of Attorney is executed by authority of resolutions adopted by the Executive Committees of the Boards of Directors of the Company
on February 23, 1988 at Chicago, Illinois, true and accurate copies of which are hereinaffer set forth and are hereby certified to by the
undersigned Secretary as being in full force and effect:
NOTED, That the Chairman of the Board, the President, or any Vice President, or their appointees designated in wdting and filed with
the Secretary, or the Secretary shall have the power and authority to appoint agents and attorneys-in-fact, and to authorize them to execute on
behalf of the Company, and attach the seal of the Company thereto, bonds and undertakings, recognizances, contracts of indemnity and
other writings, obligatory in the nature thereof, and any such officers of the Company may appoint agents for acceptance of process."
This Power of Attorney is signed, sealed and certified by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution adopted by the Executive
Committee of the Boards of Directors of the Company at a meeting duly called and held on the 23rd day of February, 1988:
NOTED, That the signature of the Chairman of the Board, the President, any Vice President, or their appointees designated in writing and filed
with the Secretary, and the signature of the Secretary, the seal of the Company, and certffications by the Secretary, may be affixed by facsimile
on any power of attorney or bond executed pursuant to resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors on February 23,
1988 and any such power so executed, sealed and certified with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached, shall continue to
be valid and binding upon the Company."
In Testimony Whereof, the Company has caused this instrument to be signed and their corporate seals to be affixed by their authorized officers,
this January 28, 1993.
Attested and Certified:
Robert P. Hames, Secretary by
Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company
Amedcan Motorists Insurance Company
Amedcan Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company
J. S. Kemper, III, Exec. Vice President
STATE OF ILLINOIS SS
COUNTY OF LAKE
I, Irene Klewer, a Notary Public, do hereby certify that J. S. Kernper, III and Robert P. Hames personally known to me to be the same persons
whose names are respectively as Exec. Vice President and Secretary of the Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, the American Motorists
Insurance Company, and the Amedcan Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company, Corporations organized and existing under the laws of the
State of Illinois, subscribed to the foregoing instrument, appeared before me this day in person and severally acknowledged that they being
thereunto duly authorized signed, sealed with the corporate seals and delivered the said instrument as the free and voluntary act of said
corporations and as their own free and voluntary acts for the uses and purposes therain set forth.
My commission expires 1-28-02
AAAAAAAAAAAAA
:=OFFICIAL 9EAL"
Irene Klewer
NOtiry PUl)ll¢: gtltte ofllllnoll
qle !~, C,e, mmll¶le, x BXpIreS JW'L :28. lolls,' lIP'
Irene Klewer, Notary Public
CERTIFICATION
I, J.K. Conway, Corporate Secretary of the Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, the Amedcan Motorists Insurance Company, and the
Amedcan Manufacturers Mutual insurance Company. do hereby certify that the attached Power of Attomey dated January 28, 1993 on
behalf of the person(s) as listed above is a true and correct copy and that the same has been in full force and effect sinco the date thereof and is
in full force and effect on the date of this certfficate; and I do further certify that the said J. S. Kemper, III and Robert P. Hames, who executed the
Power of Attomey as Executive Vice President and Secretary respectively were on the date of the execution of the attached Power of Attomey
the duly elected Executive Vice President and Secretary of the Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, the Amedcan Motorists Insurance
Company, and the American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seal of the Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company,
the American Motorists Insurance Company, and the Amedcan Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company on this
J. I~ Conway, Corporate Secretary
This Power of Attomey limits the acts of those named therein to the bonds and undertakings specifically named
therein and they have no authority to bind the Company except in the manner and to the extent herein stated.
FK 0362 6-96
Power ofAttomey - Term Pdnted in U.S.A
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
i State of Californi:A ' } f
~ County of O NGE ss.
i On '7 o '7.,c2-,~'~ before me Rochelle M. Sromalla, Notary Publi~
~ Date ' ' Name an~ Title of Officer {e,g., Jane Doe. Notary Public")
ii _ personally known to me
~ 2 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
acknowledged to me that helsheJq~E~xecuted
the same in his/he~Z) authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/he~:)
C-'
Place Notary Seal Above
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or
the entity upon behalf of which the person(s)
acted. e ecuted the instrument.
~gnalure o ota u ic
OPTIONAL
Though the informat/on below is not reclutred by law. it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent removal and reaffachment of this form to another clocument.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document:
Document Date:
Number of Pages:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer
Signers Name:
' Individual
' Corporate Officer -- Title(s):
- Partner- 7' Limited _' General
' Attorney in Fact
Z Trustee
' Guardian or Conservator
,__: Other:
Top Ol thumD nere
Signer Is Representing:
~1997NalioniNolaryAssocialmn.9350DeSotoAve..P.O, Box2402-Chatsworm, CA 91313-2402 Plod, No. 5907 Reon:ler:.C.,allToll,,Freel.,800-876-682"/'
Preliminary Cost Estimate for Long Canyon Creek Park
Tract No. 28510-1; Lot No. 81
Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost
Number
I Grade Site (import 15,500 CUYD ,1.50
fill)
2 Concrete Swale 150 LF ,10.00
3 Demo. Ext. Curb 1 LS ,1,500.00
and Sidewalk
4 New Curb cut and 2 EA ,1,500.00
Sidewalk
5 6" PCC curb 240 LF ,8.00
6 6"PCC 240 LF ,10.00
Curb/Gutter
7 3" AC pvmnt over 8,300 SF
6" Class II base
8 HC Ramp I LS ,250.00
9 Prkg lot,sign,stripe 1 LS ,1,500.00
10 PCC pavement 11,950 SF ,4.00
11 Tot lot sub drain I LS ,2,000.00
12 PCC Tot Lot edge 310 LF ,25.00
13 HC Play Surface 1,200 SF ,15.00
14 Play Equipment I LS ,57,250.00
15 Wash plstr. sand 1 LS ,2,000.00
16 Picnic Tble. Cover 2 EA ,3,500.00
17 Picnic Tables 5 EA ,1,000.00
18 Cast Metal BBQ's 5 EA ,500.00
19 Drinking Fountain 1 EA ,500.00
20 Steel Fence/Gates 1,085 LF ,25.00
21 Split Rail Fence 260 LF ,15.00
22 Meter and Lighting I LS ,7,500.00
@ Picnic Tables
23 Water Meter 1 LS ,2,000.00
24 Backflow Prevent. 2 LS ,2,000,00
25 Irrigation Cntrller. I LS ,8,800.00
26 Irrigation system 144,800 SF ,0.50
27 Soil Preparation 144,800 SF ,0.15
28 Trees - 15 Gal. 76 EA ,85.00
29 Shrubs 99 EA ,7.00
30 Grnd. Cover 23, 175 SF ,0.35
31 Hydroseed Turf 114,000 SF ,0.10
32 Plant 1 LS ,3,500.00
establishment
33 10% Design Fee 1 LS
Total Eligible for DIF
Credit
,23,250.00 0
,500.00 0
,500.00 0
,3,000.00 0
,1,920.00 ,1,920.00
,2,400.00 ,2,400.00
,1.50 ,12,450.00 ,12,450.00
,250.00 ,250.00
,1,500.00 ,1,500.00
,47,800.00 ,47,800.00
,2,000.00 ,2,000.00
,7,750.00 ,7,500.00
,18,000.00 ,18,000.00
,57,250.00 ,57,250.00
,2,000.00 ,2,000.00
,7,000.00 ,7,000.00
,5,000.00 ,5,000.00
,2,500.00 ,2,500.00
,500.00 500.00
,27,125.00 **,16,975.00
,3,900.00 ,3,900.00
,7,500.00 ,7,500.00
,2,000.00 0
,4,000.00 ,4,000.00
,8,800.00 ,8,800.00
,72,400.00 ,72,400.00
,21,720.00 ,21,720.00
,6,460.00 ,6,460.00
,693.00 ,693.00
,8,112.00 ,8,112.00
,11,400.00 ,11,400.00
,3,500.00 ,3,500.00
,25,000.00 ,25.000.00 ,25,000.00
Totals ,400, 180.00 ,358,530.00
R: XYASINOBKXAGENDAS\CamposVerdes. difagreement. doc
**Item 20: provides credits of $16,275 ($15 per LF) for perimeter fencing and ,700 for three (3) steel gates.
ITEM 13
APPROVAL
CITY A'FFORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCt
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
/}V~lWilliam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 14, 1999
Tract Map No. 24183-1, Located North of Campanula Way, East of Meadows
Parkway, West of Butterfield Stage Road, and South of De Portola Road and
within Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan No. 219
PREPARED BY:/--~Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director ~,~c W,~.rks Reza James, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve 1) Tract Map No. 24183-1 in conformance
with the Conditions of Approval 2) Subdivision Improvement Agreement 3) Subdivision Monument
Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond and Monument Bond
as security for the agreements.
BACKGROUND: Tract Map No. 24183-1 is located within Planning Area 5 of the Paloma
Del Sol Specific Plan No. 219· Tract Map No. 24183-1 is subject to all Specific Plan Amendments and
Agreements. The Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan has been amended six (6) times. Amendment No. 6,
the most recent amendment, was approved by City Council on January 13, 1998. Vesting Tentative
Tract Map No. 24183 was approved by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on February 2, 1998,
expiration date being February 18, 2003. The Developer has met all of the Conditions of Approval.
Final Tract Map No. 24183-1 is seventy six (76) lot single family residential subdivision with five (5) open
space lots. The tract is located North of Campanula Way, East of Meadows Parkway, south of De
Portola Road, west of Butterfield Stage Road, and within Planning Area 5 of the Paloma Del Sol Spedtic
Plan. The site is currently undeveloped.
The following fees have been deferred for Tract Map No. 24183-1:
Development Impact Fee due prior to issuance of a building permit.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
2.
3.
4.
Development Fee Checklist
Fees & Securities Report
Project Vicinity Map
Tract Map No. 24183-1
r:',agdrpt\99\091 4\tr24183-1
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO. TM 24183-1
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project.
FEE
Development Impact Fee
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
To be paid prior to issuance of a building permit
r:~agdrpt~99\0914\tr24183-1
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT MAP NO. 24183-1
IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
SECURITY
Street and Drainage $ 682,500
Water $ 154,000
Sewer $ 102,500
TOTAL $ 939,000
DATE: September 14, 1999
MATERIAL & LABOR MONUMENT
SECURITY SECURITY
$ 341,250 -
$ 77,000 -
$ 51,250 -
$ 469,500 $ 11,437
DEVELOPMENT FEES
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
RCFCD (ADP) Fee
Development Impact Fee
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
Fees Paid to Date
Balance of Fees Due
'To Be Determined.
$ 0.00
$ N/A
$ TBD*
$ 188.00
$ 8.00
$ 2,490.00
$ 571.85
$ 3,257.85
$ 0.00
r:~agdrptL99\0914\tr24183-1
oBDviS (G"U,,f_j~DLj__LD8
%/iFd' b3 SIt40(2V3,~
'
0
ROAD
O
ROAD
·
iT
!7
ujo i~I 66/10/60 O/~a~OOftLgOO\l-~lLtl:%~OVaL\ONkl~f/f%O~O\gOOOOl{;l\VLV(~l~Og~M~\:H
f
/
/
/
/ I~
/
J.3:~.LS
VI~T]S
ITEM 14
APPROVAL
CITY A'I'FORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City ManagedCity Council
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE:
September 14, 1999
SUBJECT:
Tract Map No. 24183, Located North of Campanula Way, East of Meadows
Parkway, West of Butterfield Stage Road, and South of De Portola Road and
within Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan No. 219
PREPARED BY: rj~?Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director o~/,~c Works Reza James, Assistant Engineer /~
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve 1) Tract Map No. 24183 in conformance
with the Conditions of Approval 2) Subdivision Improvement Agreement 3) Subdivision Monument
Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond and Monument Bond
as security for the agreements.
BACKGROUND: Tract Map No. 24183 is located within Planning Area 5 of the Paloma Del
Sol Specific Plan No. 219. Tract Map No. 24183 is subject to all Specific Plan Amendments and
Agreements. The Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan has been amended six times. Amendment No. 6, the
most recent amendment, was approved by City Council on January 13, 1998. Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 24183 was approved by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on February 2, 1998,
expiration date being February 18, 2003. The Developer has met all of the Conditions of Approval.
Final Tract Map No. 24183 is seventy six (76) lot single family residential subdivision with three (3) open
space lots. The tract is located North of Campanula Way, East of Meadows Parkway, south of De
Portola Road, west of Butterfield Stage Road, and within Planning Area 5 of the Paloma Del Sol Specific
Plan. The site is currently undeveloped.
The following fees have been deferred for Tract Map No. 24183
Development Impact Fee due prior to issuance of a building permit.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
2.
3.
4.
Development Fee Checklist
Fees & Securities Report
Project Vicinity Map
Tract Map No. 24183
r:~agdrptL99\0914\tr24183
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO. TM 24183
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project,
FEE
Development Impact Fee
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
to be paid prior to issuance of a building permit
r: ~agdrptL99\0914\tr24183
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT MAP NO. 24183
IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
SECURITY
Street and Drainage $ 362,500
Water $ 107,000
Sewer $ 68,500
TOTAL $ 538,000
DATE: September 14, 1999
MATERIAL & LABOR MONUMENT
SECURITY SECURITY
$ 181,250 -
$ 53,500 -
$ 34,250 -
$ 269,000 $ 11,437
DEVELOPMENT FEES
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
RCFCD (ADP) Fee
Development Impact Fee
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
Fees Paid to Date
Balance of Fees Due
~To Be Determined.
$ 0.00
$ N/A
$ TBD*
$ 183.00
$ 8.00
$ 2,390.00
$ 571.85
$ 3,152.85
$ 0.00
r: ~agdrpt~99\0914\tr24183
30VZS
j_ROAD
gL 3IVlSa31
0
(D
'7
0
<C
::Iii
_1
<C
CD
>-
u~ 911 66/10/60
u~ zt~ ea/~o/eo ~a.too~goo~l~t~oya~\~wdd~n\~a\seooo~g~\v~vad~osdu9\~4
~ II
I
I
.O0'ooi
ITEM 15
APPROVAL
CITY
ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: /'~A William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: September 14, 1999
SUBJECT: Release Faithful Performance Warranty Security for Public Improvements in
Parcel Map No. 24085-3 (Located Northwesterly of the Intersection of Diaz
Road and Zevo Drive - Avenida de Ventas)
PREPARED BY: ~/~TtlAonald J Parks Deputy Director of Public Works Ibert K. 'Cdsp, ~ermit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. AUTHORIZE release of the Faithful Performance Warranty security for Public Improvements
in Parcel Map No. 24085-3.
2. DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
BACKGROUND: On December 16, 1997, the City Council approved Parcel Map No. 24085-3
and entered into subdivision improvement agreement with:
Westside City 1 LLC, a California Limited Liability Company
for the improvement of streets and drainage, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the
agreement were cash deposits as follows:
In the amount of $99,567 for Faithful Performance for street and drainage improvements.
In the amount of $64,438 for Labor and Materials for street and drainage improvements.
In the amount of $3,000 for subdivision monumentation.
On August 11, 1998, the City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the one-year
warranty period, and authorized reduction in Faithful Performance amount as follows:
Cash deposit In the amount of $63,232 for Faithful Performance Warranty Purposes
The remaining Faithful Performance warranty amount for street and drainage improvements was
cash deposit in the amount of $36,335.
-1 - r:\agdrpt\99\O914\pm240853.fin
On September 8, 1998, the City Council accepted substitute securities for the retained cash
deposits. Letters of Credit were posted by Temecula Valley Bank as follows:
Letter of Credit No. 00010 for Faithful Performance in the amount of $36,335.
Letter of Credit No. 00011 for Labor and Materials in the amount of $64,438.
The developer was required to post security for labor and materials to assure payment to suppliers
of those services/materials. The contractual six-month lien period following City Coundl acceptance
of the improvements having expired, with no claims having been made, City Council authorized the
release of the Labor and Materials security on March 2, 1999
The one-year warranty period has run. Staff has reviewed the public improvements in the field and
all necessa~ repairs/replacement having been satisfactorily completed, Staff recommends release
of the following security:
Letter of Credit No. 00010 for Faithful Performance Warranty in the amount of $36,335.
The subdivision monumentation will be reviewed and approved by Public Works Staff and
recommended for release of security when appropriate.
The streets within this phase of development were accepted into the City Maintained-Street System
by Resolution No. 98-80 on August 11, 1998. The streets accepted were portions of Remington
Avenue and Diaz Road.
FISCAL IMPACT:
ATTACH MEN T:
None.
Location Map
-2- r:\agdrpt\99\0914\pm240853.fin
P.M. 8/78
POR. PARCEL 3 P.A4.
t
PARCEL I t
~ / P~.~8~ i a2~4
~ PARC~ 2
~ z PARC~ 3
~: '-~-~._
P,IRC~
\\
-,:arcel Man No. 24085-3
",ocation Mau
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCAIjE
ITEM 16
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
q~/~illiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 14, 1999
Release Faithful Performance Warranty security for Public Improvements in
Parcel Map No. 24085-F (Located Northwesterly of the Intersection of Diaz
Road and Zevo Drive ( formerly Avenida de Ventas))
PREPARED BY: ~,, Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
7~{/~Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council
1. AUTHORIZE release of the Faithful Performance Warranty security for the public
improvements in Parcel Map No. 24085-F
2. DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
BACKGROUND: On December 16, 1997, the City Council approved Parcel Map No.
24085-F and entered into subdivision agreement with:
Westside City I, LLC
for the improvement of streets, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision
agreements were cash deposits as follows:
In the amount of $10,574 for Faithful Performance
In the amount of $10,574 for Labor and Materials.
In the amount of $3,000 for installation of subdivision monumentation.
On April 28, 1998, the City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the one-year
warranty period, authorized release of the subdivision monument security, and authorized combining
of the Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials security. The Labor and Materials
security ($10,574) was sufficient to cover both Faithful Performance warranty and Labor and
Materials considerations, and would be maintained as follows:
In the amount of $5,287 for Faithful Performance Warranty.
In the amount of $5,287 for Labor and Materials
r: ~agdrpt~99~0914~pm24085f. fin
The Faithful Performance warranty portion would be retained for the contractual one-year warranty
period.
The Labor and Materials portion is maintained for the minimum contractual lien period of six-months.
That period having run and no claims for either labor or materials having been filed, on November
10, 1998, the City Council authorized release of the Labor and Materials portion of the remaining
cash deposit:
The one-year warranty period having run, all necessary repairs/replacements of the public
improvements having been satisfactorily completed, therefore Staff recommends release of the
following security:
Cash deposit in the amount of $5,287 for Faithful Performance Warranty purposes
The street within this subdivision was accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by Resolution
No. 98-33 on April 28, 1998. The street accepted is a portion of Remington Avenue.
FISCAL IMPACT:
ATTACHMENTS:
None
Location Map
r:~agdrpt~99~0914~pm24085f.fin
GEL ''/' r,i,l, e/'/6
p ARGEL ~'
X P.M. '188170,
pA,qGE. L 2
'~g ~ g2 - g4
PARCFJ, MAP NO. 24085-F
Locgtion N~
NOTF,; MAPS NOT TO SCALE
ITEM
17
APPROVAL,~
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 14, 1999
Release Faithful Performance Warranty Security in Parcel Map 27714
(Located east side of Ynez Road, between Solana Way and Rancho
California Road)
PREPARED BY: F,r Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
f~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
AUTHORIZE release of the Faithful Performance Warranty security in Parcel Map No.
27714.
2. DIRECT the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and surety.
BACKGROUND: On December 19, 1995, the City Council approved Parcel Map No.
27714 and entered into subdivision improvement agreements with:
Rancon Realty Fund IV (c/o Glenborough Corporation)
400 South El Camino Real, Suite 1100
San Mateo, CA 94402-1708
for the improvement of portions of Ynez Road, and pdvate street, and water and sewer systems, and
subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreement were surety bonds posted
by Explorer Insurance Company as follows:
Bond No. 137 38 63 in the total amount of $474,000 ($337,500, $92,500, and
$44,000, respectively) to cover faithful performance for streets and drainage,
and water and sewer improvements.
o
Bond No. 137 38 63 in the total amount of $237,000 ($169,000, $46,000, and
$22,000, respectively) to cover labor and materials for streets and drainage, and
water and sewer improvements.
3. Bond No. 137 38 64 in the amount of $3,500 to cover subdivision monumentation.
r:~agdrpfi99~0914~pm27714.final
On June 24, 1997, the City Council accepted the public street and drainage improvements,
recognized completion of the private streets, drainage, and water and sewer improvements,
accepted the subdivision monumentation, initiated the one-year warranty period, and authorized
reduction in the Faithful Performance security amount to the ten-percent (10%) warranty amount
accepted the subdivision monumentation. The Faithful Performance security amount was reduced
to the following warranty amount:
Streets/Drainage, and Water/Sewer Improvements -Bond No. 137 38 63
$47,400
On November 18, 1997, the City Council accepted a rider to the original faithful performance
security reducing the bond to the appropriate warranty amount ($47,400).
The developer was required to post Labor and Materials bonds to ensure payment to suppliers and
workers. This bond is maintained for six-months after the City Council accepts the public
improvements and acknowledges completion of the private improvements. The lien period having
passed without any claims for labor or materials posted, City Council authorized release of the labor
and materials security on January 12, 1999.
At that same meeting City Council authorized the release of a security for Traffic Signalization
Mitigation.
The one-year warranty period has run. Public Works Staff has reviewed the public improvements
in the field following this warranty period and any and all required improvement repairs/replacements
have been satisfactorily completed. Therefore Staff recommends release of the following Faithful
Performance Warranty security:
Streets/Drainage, and Water/Sewer improvements-Bond No. 137 38 63
$47,400
The affected street within the parcel map boundary is Ynez Road. This street was part of the County
Maintained-Road System prior to City incorporation on December 1, 1989, and became a part of the
City Maintained-Street System by succession to the County.
FISCAL IMPACT:
ATTACHMENT:
None
Location Map
r:~agdrpt~9M;)914~pm27714.final
ParcelMap No. ?,7714
I,ocation MaD
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE
ITEM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVALC~.,~
CITY A ORN
OF
DIRECTOR NAN
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
'/~(W~illiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 14, 1999
Release Securities for Faithful Performance Warranty for Public
Improvements and Traffic Signalization Mitigation fees in Tract No. 21818.
( Westedy of intersection of Via Notre at Kahwea Road)
PREPARED BY:/'/Y Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
,/~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council
1. AUTHORIZE release of the securities for Faithful Performance Warranty
Improvements in Tract No. 21818.
3. DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
for the Public
BACKGROUND: On June 25, 1991, the City Council approved Tract Map No. 21818,
and entered into subdivision agreements with:
Bedford Development Company
for the improvement of street and drainage, installation of water systems, and subdivision
monumentation, and traffic signalization mitigation fees. Accompanying the subdivision agreements
were Instruments of Credit issued by Butterfield Financial Corporation as follows:
1. Instrument of Credit in the amount of $442,000 ($365,500, and $74,500, for street and
drainage, and water system, respectively) to cover faithful performance.
2. Instrument of Credit in the amount of $221,000 ($184,000 and $37,500, for street and
drainage, and water system, respectively) to cover labor and materials.
3. Instrument of Credit in the amount of $14,500 to cover subdivision monumentation.
4. Instrument of Credit in the amount of $4,350.00 to cover traffic signalization mitigation fees.
Mesa Homes sold the project subsequent to recording the tract map. The new developer is:
Barrick/Grimm
746 S. Main Street, Suite "A"
Fallbrook, CA 92028
r:~agdrpt~99~0914~tr21818.fnl/akc
The new developer submitted replacement agreements and security for the contractual work. The
substituted securities were Letters of Credit issued by Scripps Bank as follows:
Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 01-454 in the total amount of $442,000 ($365,500, and
$74,500, for Street and Drainage, and Water System, respectively) to cover Faithful
Performance.
Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 01~453 in the total amount of $221,000 ($184,000, and
$37,500, for Street and Drainage, and Water System, respectively) for Labor and Materials.
Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 01-452 in the amount of $14,500 for Subdivision
Monumentation
Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 01-451 in the amount of $4,350 for Traffic Signalization
Mitigation fees.
On July 14, 1998, the City Council authorized partial reduction in the Faithful Performance secudty
amount by the fifty-percent (50%) maximum permitted under Section 6.(b) of the Subdivision
Improvement Agreement. The security was reduced to the following amount:
Street and Drainage, and Water System Improvements LOC No. 01-454 $221,000
On July 28, 1998, the City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the one-year warranty
period, and authorized reduction in the Faithful Performance security amount to the following ten
percent (10%) warranty level:
Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 01-454 for Faithful Performance Warranty for Street and
Drainage, and Water System Improvements in the amount of $44,200
On May 11, 1999, the City Council authorized release of both the Labor and Materials and
Subdivision Monumentation securities.
On August 24, 1999, the City Council accepted a cash deposit submitted by the developer in
substitution for the Irrevocable Letter of Credit for the Faithful Performance Warranty in the amount
of $44,200 and authorized release of the security on file.
The one-year warranty period for public improvements has passed. The developer has satisfactorily
completed all necessary repairs or replacements. Therefore Staff recommends release of the
following security for Faithful Performance Warranty purposes:
Cash Deposit per Receipt No. 60940 dated August 12, 1999 in the amount of $44,200.
Under provisions of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee structure, adopted by the City
Council under Ordinance No. 97-14, traffic signalization mitigation fees are collected based on
square footage of floor space rather than the parcel gross acreage previously employed. Accordingly
the security on file is eligible for release. Therefore Staff recommends release of the following
security:
Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 01-451 for Traffic Signalization Mitigation
in the amount of
$4,350.
r:~agdrptL99~0914~tr21818.fnl/akc
The public streets within this tract were accepted into the City-Maintained Street System by City
Council Resolution No. 98-72 on July 28, 1998. The streets accepted are Baccarat Road and a
portion of Kahwea Road (formerly Green Meadow Road). Portions of Via Norte, Avenida Centenario,
Avenida Del Reposo, and Avenida Buena Suerte are within the tract boundanj but were within the
County Maintained-Road system at the time of City Incorporation and became part of the City-
Maintained Street System by succession on December 1, 1989.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: Location Map
r:~agdrpt~99~0914~tr21818.fnl/akc
C~i~~ C~LIFO~NM
s
Tract No. 21818
7',ocation Man
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE
ITEM
19
APPROVAL
CITY A'I'FORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
"~"J/)~william G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 14, 1999
Approval of an Additional Expenditure for FY98-99 Street Striping Contract
- Pacific Striping, Inc.
PREPARED BY: Bradley A. Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the additional expenditure to FY98-99
contract with Pacific Striping Inc., increasing the contract amount by $17,815.00.
BACKGROUND: On June 16, 1998 the City Council approved a Street Stdping Contract
with Pacific Striping, Inc. to provide Citywide striping, re-striping and installation of raised pavement
markers.
At the January 12, 1999 City Council workshop meeting Council directed staff to provide additional
traffic flow improvements that included additional services outside the odginal striping contract scope
of work. This additional expenditure to the FY98-99 contract required additional striping and
installation of raised pavement markers at the request of the Public Works Traffic Division for
improved traffic flow. The additional scope of services included the following:
Installation of fire hydrant blue dots Citywide (approximately 1000), located and installed for
a cost of $5,000.
Additional striping/lay-out, and restriping of various locations i.e., Winchester Road at
Jefferson Avenue, Margarita Road at Rancho California Road for a cost of $12,815.00.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Street Stdping Program Project No. PW97-28 was funded by Public
Works Maintenance Division budget. Adequate funds are available in the FY98-99 Account No. 001-
164-601-5410 to cover the additional cost.
r:~agdrptL99\0914~stripeamend
ITEM
2O
APPROVA~
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINA
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City Manager/City Council
4~jl/~'t,/Villiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE:
September 14, 1999
SUBJECT:
Award of Construction Contract for the Traffic Signal and Median
Modification at Rancho California Road and Town Center Drive - Project
No. PW99-09
PREPARED BY:
~JSteve Charette, Assistant Engineer- Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Award a contract for the Traffic Signal and Median Modification at Rancho California
Road and Town Center Drive, Project No. PW99-09 to DBX, Inc. for $47,740.00, and
authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $4,774.00, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND: On July 13, 1999, the City Council approved the plans and specifications,
and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids.
This project will include modifications to the intersection of Rancho California Road at Town Center
Drive, which will expedite turning movements and allow for longer green time for Rancho California
Road. Improvements will include the relocation of signal poles, installation of new handicap ramps,
modification of median islands and the relocation of the crosswalk to the west side of the
intersection. The intersection will also be re-striped to allow for an additional left turn lane from
Town Center Drive to eastbound Rancho California Road.
The Engineer's estimate for this project is $41,100.00.
One (1) bid was received and publicly opened on September 2, 1999 and results are as follows:
DBX, Inc .................................................................................$47,740.00
DBX, Inc., is a local Temecula company that has successfully completed ten (10) traffic signal
installation and signal modification projects for the City in the last three (3) years. DBX has
consistently been among the three lowest bidders for City traffic signal projects.
The specifications allow Fifteen (15) working days for completion of this project. Work is expected
to begin in October, 1999 and be completed by the early November, 1999.
1
r:\agdrpt\99\0914\pw99-09.awd/smc
This project originated from discussion between the Traffic / Safety Commission and the owners
of the Town Center as an improvement that will improve egress from the Town Center
Development and free up signal time for Rancho California Road. This project is completely
separate and distinct from the median closures recently recommended by the Traffic/Safety
Commission.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
FISCAL IMPACT: This project is funded through Department of Public Works Traffic
Improvement funds. These funds have been appropriated in Account No. 001-164-602-5412 for
Project No. PW99-09. The total project is $52,514.00, which included the contract amount of
$47,740.00 plus 10% contingency of $4,774.00.
ATTACHMENT: Construction Contract
r:\agdrpt\99\0914\pw99-09.awd/smc
V'IA
~ROJFC~
SITE
OLI'
TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND MEDIAN MODIFICATION AT
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND TOWN CENTER DRIVE
PROJECT NO. PW99-09
RE-STRIPING
NEW RAMP (TYP.)
NEW CROSSWALK
REMOVE MEDIAN PORTION
o
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
NEW RAMP
TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND MEDIAN MODIFICATION AT
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND TOWN CENTER DRIVE
PROJECT NO. PW99-09
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW99-09
TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND MEDIAN MODIFICATION
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT TOWN CENTER DRIVE
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 14th day of September, 1999, by and between the
City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereina~er referred to as "CITY", and DBX, Inc.,
hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree
as follows:
1.a.
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract
Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance
Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW99-
09, TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND MEDIAN MODIFICATION - RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
AT TOWN CENTER DRIVE, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and
amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard
Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical
Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint
Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated
General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by
the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for
PROJECT NO. PW99-09, TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND MEDIAN MODIFICATION - RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD AT TOWN CENTER DRIVE. Copies of these Standard
Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building New, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials,
and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General
Specifications, Special Provision, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW99-
09, TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND MEDIAN MODIFICATION - RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
AT TOWN CENTER DRIVE.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract
Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in
lieu of, such conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in
complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed
and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise
CONTRACT CA-1 R:\CIP\PROJECTS\PW99\PW99-09\contracl
,
specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and
incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. The Contract
Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if
called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document
shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed,
shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment,
and all utility and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW99-09, TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND MEDIAN MODIFICATION
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT TOWN CENTER DRIVE
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance
with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents herein
above enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished
and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to
the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHDULE. The CITY agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR
agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of: FORTY
SEVEN THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FORTY DOLLARS and NO CENTS
($47,740.00), the total amount of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed fifteen (15)
working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction
shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that
the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order,
changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as
established by the City Council.
PAYMENTS
LUMP SUM BID SCEHDULE:
Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to
the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the
work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its
accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the
City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's
payment requests.
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days
after submission of a payment request to the CITY, the CONTRACTOR shall be
paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed
CONTRACT CA-2 R \CIP\PROJECTS\PW99\PW99-09~conlract
according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or
about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses.
The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be
made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR
filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms
provided by the CITY.
Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law,
accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for
which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of
the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of
the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an
acceptance of any part of the work.
Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30)
days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code
Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference.
In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code, a reduction in the
retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the
Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project
is more than 50% complete.
WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is
recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty
performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following
schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
$25,000 0 $75,000
RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE
180 days 3%
$75,00- $500,OO0
180 days
$2,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of $75,000
Over$500,000
One Year
$10,750 + 1% of amount
in excess of $500,000
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government
Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of one
thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond
the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted
from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be
deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR.
CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated
damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or
negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is
required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay.
CONTRACT CA-3 R:\CIP\PROJECTS\PW99\PW99-09\contract
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6
above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to
work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the
payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of
all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to
execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment.
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of
the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per
diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each
craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director
of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk.
Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR
shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing
wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Section
1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each
laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for
any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation
of the provisions of the Contract.
TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or
in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone.
CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers,
employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or
indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigation arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the CITY for any
and all costs incurred by the CITY as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The
CITY shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the CITY.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or
representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable
treatment with respect thereto.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or
any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been employed
by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all
CONTRACT CA-4 R:\CIP~PROjECTS\PW99\PW99-09\conIract
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors
upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against
the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has
been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge
that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely
performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof,
including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY.
BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part
thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable
times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner
as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and
acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final
inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national
origin, color, sex age, or handicap.
GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the
State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to
this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning
this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with
geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the
parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be
entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation.
ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor
is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-
336, as amended.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents,
and to the CITY addressed as follows:
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
CONTRACT CA-5 R ~,CIP\PROJECTS\PW99\PW99-09\contracl
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the
date first above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR:
DBX, Inc.
42066 Avenida Alvarado, #C
Temecula, CA 92590
(909) 676-0115
By:
Jim Perry, President, Secretary/Treasurer
DATED:
CITY OF TEMECULA:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE, City Clerk
CONTRACT CA-6 R \CIP\PROJECTS\PW99~PW99-09\contract
ITEM
21
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City ManagedCity Council
/]~-,/4'VVilliam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE:
September 14, 1999
SUBJECT:
Superseding Freeway Agreement for State Highway Route 15 within the City of
Temecula
PREPARED BY: Ameff~~,Senior Engineer - Capital Projects
~ Steven W. Beswick, Associate Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING A "SUPERSEDING FREEWAY
AGREEMENT, BETWEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACTING
BY AND THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(STATE), AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING THAT
CERTAIN SECTION OF STATE HIGHWAY ROUTE 15 BETWEEN
THE SOUTH TEMECULA CITY LIMIT AND THE NORTH
TEMECULA CITY LIMIT TO BE A FREEWAY".
Approve an Agreement declaring that certain section of State Highway Route 15 between the
Southern and Northern Temecula City limits to be a freeway with the State of California
Department of Transportation (State) and authorize the mayor to execute the Amendment.
BACKGROUND: On November 12, 1947, the California Transportation Commission
adopted a Resolution stating the following: Declaring that certain section of State Highway Route 15
in the City of Temecula between the southern and northern Temecula City Limits (Post Mile 2.0/7.5) and
State Highway Route 15 between the San Diego County Line and 3.5 miles north of Temecula to be a
freeway. Also, on January 18, 1950, the California Transportation Commission adopted a Resolution,
declaring that certain section of State Highway Routes 15 and 215 between one (1) mile north of
Temecula and Antelope Road to be a freeway. In addition, on January 18, 1971, the State and the
County of Riverside entered into a Supplemental Freeway Agreement relating to that portion of State
Highway Route 15 from two (2) miles north of San Diego County Line to the junction of Route 215.
R :~agdrpt~99\0914\CaltransFreeway.agree/ajp
The purpose of revising the existing Freeway Agreement at this time is the construction of Overland
Drive Overcrossing of State Highway Route 15. The State executes superseding Freeway Agreements
with local agencies whenever there are major changes to existing highway fadlities within agency limits.
The State has prepared a revised map of the freeway showing the proposed plan of the City as it affects
City streets and requests that the City enter into a new Freeway Agreement in accordance with the
revised map of said freeway.
The Supersedin.cl Freeway Agreement includes the following articles:
· This Agreement supersedes the portion of the Freeway Agreement dated January 18, 1971, from
two (2) miles north of San Diego County Line to the junction of route 215 with the City of Temecula,
as shown on the attached revised Exhibit "A".
· State and City agree and consent to the construction of a new overcrossing structure and other
construction affecting City Streets, at Ovedand Drive and Route 15, all as shown on said plan map
attached hereto marked revised Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof by this reference.
· City in the construction of said freeway overcrossing will, at City's expense, make such changes
affecting City streets in accordance with the plan map attached hereto marked revised Exhibit "A"
· City agrees to acquire all necessary right-of-way as may be required for construction of City streets
and Overland Drive Overcrossing, and the cost of right-of-way required to construct the Overland
Drive Overcrossing project shall be born by City.
· This Agreement may be modified at any time in writing by the mutual consent of the parties hereto,
as may become necessary for the best accomplishment through State and City cooperation of the
overcrossing project for the benefit of the people of the State and of the City.
The Agreement was approved and reviewed by the City Attorney.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENT:
1. Resolution No. 99-
2. Agreement
RAagdrpt~99\0914\CaltransFreeway.agree/ajp
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING A "SUPERSEDING FrEEWAY
AGREEMENT, BETWEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACTING
BY AND THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
{STATE), AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING THAT
CERTAIN SECTION OF STATE HIGHWAY ROUTE 15 BETWEEN
THE SOUTH TEMECULA CITY LIMIT AND THE NORTH
TEMECULA CITY LIMIT TO BE A FREEWAY".
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare
that: The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves that certain agreement entitled
"Superseding Freeway Agreement, between the State of California acting by and through the
Department of Transportation (State), and the City of Temecula declaring that certain section of State
Highway Route 15 between the South Temecula City Limit and the North Temecula City Limit to be a
Freeway", and authorizes the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City in substantially the
form attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 14th
day of September 1999.
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
A'Ff'EST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE, City Clerk
R:~agdrpt99\0914\CaltransFreeway.agree/ajp
(SEAL)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
AYES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
R:~agdrptL99\0914\CaltransFreeway.agree/ajp
8-Riv-15-KP 3.2/12.0
(PM 2.0/7.5)
In the City of Temecula
between the South Temecula
City Limit and the North
Temecula City Limit
08303 - 354601
SUPERSEDING FREEWAY AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on this 14th day of
September , 1999 , by and between the STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
acting by and through the Department of Transportation (herein
referred to as STATE), and the CITY of TEMECULA (herein referred
to as CITY)
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the highway described above has been declared to be
a freeway by Resolution of the California Transportation
Commission on November 12, 1947, declaring that certain section
of State Highway Route 15 between the San Diego County Line and
3.5 miles north of Temecula to be a freeway, and a resolution on
January 18, 1950, declaring that certain section of State Highway
Routes 15 and 215 between one mile north of Temecula and Antelope
Road to be a freeway; and
WHEREAS, STATE and County of Riverside have entered into a
Supplemental Freeway Agreement dated January 18, 1971, relating
to that portion of State Highway Route 15 from two miles north of
San Diego County Line to the junction of Route 215; and
WHEREAS, a revised plan map for such freeway has been
prepared showing the proposed plan of the CITY as it affects
streets of the CITY; and
WHEREAS, it is the mutual desire of the parties hereto to
enter into a new Freeway Agreement in accordance with the revised
plan of said freeway;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED:
1. This Agreement supersedes the portion of said Freeway
Agreement dated January 18, 1971 from two miles north of San
Diego County Line to the junction of Route 215 within the City of
Temecula, as shown on attached revised Exhibit "A".
1
8-Riv-15-KP 3.2/12.0
(PM 2.0/7.5)
2. STATE and CITY agree and consent to the construction of
a new overcrossing structure and other construction affecting
CITY streets, at Overland Drive and Route 15, all as shown on
said plan map attached hereto marked revised Exhibit A and made a
part hereof by this reference.
3. CITY in the construction of said freeway overcrossing
will, at CITY's expense, make such changes affecting CITY streets
in accordance with the plan map attached hereto marked revised
Exhibit A.
4. CITY agrees to acquire all necessary right of way as may
be required for construction of CITY streets and Overland Drive
Overcrossing, and the cost of right of way required to construct
the Overland Drive Overcrossing project shall be borne by CITY.
5. This Agreement may be modified at any time in writing by
the mutual consent of the parties hereto, as may become necessary
for the best accomplishment through STATE and CITY cooperation of
the Overcrossing project for the benefit of the people of the
STATE and of the CITY.
2
8-Riv-15-KP 3.2/12.0
(PM 2.0/7.5)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized
officers.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of Transportation
JOSE MEDINA
Director of Transportation
CITY OF TEMECULA
By
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
By
Project Planning and
Design Engineer
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Attorney, CITY
Attorney, State
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
JULY 13, 1999
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at
7:40 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Ddve, Temecula, California.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
5 DIRECTORS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone,
and Comerchero
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None.
Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Completion and Acceptance of the Mar~qadta Community Park - Phase I - Project No.
PW95-19CSD
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Accept the Margarita Community Park - Phase I - Project No. PW95-19CSD;
1.2 File Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year
(1) Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
1.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the Notice of
Completion if no liens have been filed.
Award of Construction Contract for the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bike Trail Undercrossing
Project No. PW97-25CSD
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Award a contract for the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bike Trail Undercrossing - Project
No. PW97-25CSD - to Granite Construction Company for $268,268.00 and
authorize the President to execute the contract;
2.2 Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $26,826.80, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
2
R~/Vlinutes~0713,.q9
3
4
Release of Parkland/Landscape Faithful Performance Bond for Tract No. 28309 -
S. R. Group, LLC (Nicolas Road, east of North General Keamv Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Authorize the City Clerk/District Secretary to release the Parkland/Landscape
Faithful Performance Bond for the construction of perimeter slope and landscaping
within Tract No. 28309 - S. R. Group, LLC;
3.2 Direct the City Clerk/District Secretary to notify the developer and surety.
Authorization to Bid and Determination of Cate.clodcal Exemption for the Installation of
Citywide Bike Lane Improvements
RECOMMENDATION:
4,1
Determine that the installation of the Bike Lane Improvements along Jefferson
Avenue, Rancho California Road, Ynez Road, and Margarita Road are
Categorically
Exempt pursuant to Section 15301 (c) of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines;
4.2
Authorize the filing of a Notice of Exemption for EA-058 with the appropriate filing
fee for the project with the County Clerk and Recorders Office;
4.3
Approve the construction documents and authorize the release of a formal public
bid for the Citywide Bike Lane Improvements within Jefferson Avenue, Rancho
California Road, Ynez Road, and Margarita Road.
Approval of Resolution Establishin.cl FY 2000-01 Rates and Charges for Service Level
B (Residential Street Lights), Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slope
Maintenance), Service Level D (Refuse Collection, Recycling, and Street Sweepin.Q) for
Redhawk and Vail Ranch Annexation, Subject to Voter Approval
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99-13
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING
SERVICE LEVEL B, SERVICE LEVEL C, AND SERVICE LEVEL
D RATES AND CHARGES WITHIN THE TERRITORY TO BE
ANNEXED TO THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES
DISTRICT AS PART OF THE REORGANIZATION DESIGNATED
AS LAFCO NO. 98-14-1 (REDHAWK AND VAIL RANCH) FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2000-01
R~Minutes~071399 2
Agency Member Ford abstained with regard to this item.
MOTION: Director Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-5. The motion was
seconded by Director Lindemans and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the
exception of Director Stone who abstained with regard to Consent Calendar Item No. 5.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
Director of Community Services Parker relayed the success of the 4th of July festivities;
thanked the community for its support; and commended the Recreation Division of TCSD, and
the Fire and Police Departments for their its efforts associated with the program.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
Concurring with Director of Community Services Parker, General City Manager Nelson
commended the Department of Public Works for its excellent work with respect to the 4th Of
July Program.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
No comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:42 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjoumed to
Tuesday, July 27, 1999, City Coundl Chambers, 43200 Business Park Ddve, Temecula,
Califomia.
Jeff Comerchero, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
RVlnute~071399 3
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
JULY 27, 1999
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:49
P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Ddve, Temecula, California. President
Comerchero presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
5 DIRECTORS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts Stone,
and Comerchero.
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None.
Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Completion and Acceptance of the Community Recreation Center Gym CoolinQ System -
Project No. PW97-22CSD
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a
one-year (1) Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
1.2 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of
the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
2 Award Restroom Maintenance Services Contract for FY 1999-00
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Award a twenty-three (23) month contract to Self's Janitorial Service to
Provide park and facility restroom maintenance services in the amount not
to exceed $38,880 for Fiscal Year 1999-00.
MOTION: Director Ford moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. I and 2. The motion was
seconded by Director Roberts and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
Minutes.csd\072799 1
DISTRICT BUSINESS
3 Sports Complex Request for Qualifications and Subcommittee
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Approve the release of a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to qualified firms
for a feasibility study for the development of a sports complex;
3.2
Appoint two (2) members of the Board of Directors to serve on a sports
Complex subcommittee.
Community Services Director Parker reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material).
With regard to the overall status of the City, Mr. Larry Murphy, 30326 Calle Halcon, commended the
City Council and City Staff on a job well done. Questioning the short-term history of the operations
of Big League Dreams Sports Parks, Mr. Murphy questioned the City investing $6.0 million with this
business. In light of the location of the proposed park, Mr. Murphy commented on how far this park
would be from any residential areas and, therefore, addressed the potential safety hazards it may
create for those children walking, bicycling, etc. to the park.
MOTION: Director Ford moved to approve staff recommendation 3.1. The motion was seconded
by Director Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
MOTION: Director Comerchero moved to appoint Directors Lindemans and Stone to serve on a
Sports Complex Subcommittee. The motion was seconded by Director Ford and voice vote
reflected unanimous approval.
4 Children's Museum Request for Qualifications and Subcommittee
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Approve the release of a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to qualified firm
for a feasibility study regarding the development of a local children's museum;
4.2
Appoint two (2) members of the Board of Directors to serve on a children's
Museum subcommittee.
Community Services Director Parker presented the staff report (of record).
City Attomey Thorson noted that since the City Council has not fully decided the exact location of
the Museum, Director Stone may partake in the discussions with respect to this matter and
recommended that the RFQ be amended to reflect that the Feasibility Study address a general site
selection for the Children's Museum, to explore all feasible sites, and to provide a recommendation.
Director Ford noted that the study should include a needs analysis for a Children's Museum within
the City, a Cultural needs analysis, and location, size, potential, and economical impact.
MOTION: Director Lindemans moved to approve staff recommendation 4.1 as amended as noted
above with regard to the Feasibility Study as to site selection. The motion was seconded by
Director Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
Minutes.csd\072799 2
MOTION: Director Stone moved to appoint Directors Comerchero and Roberts to serve on a
Children's Museum Subcommittee. The motion was seconded by Director Ford and voice vote
reflected unanimous approval.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
No comments.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
No comments.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
General Manager Nelson thanked the City Council for its support with regard to the RFQ process.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
No comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 9:09 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday,
August 10, 1999, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California.
Jeff Comerchero, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
Minutes.csd\072799 3
ITEM 2
CITY MANAGER
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
General Manager/Board of Directors
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance .~
September 14, 1999
Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
PREPARED BY: Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director ~
William B. Pattison, Senior Accountant/~
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors receive and
Statements for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999.
file the Financial
DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited activity of the
Community Services District for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999. Please see the attached
financial statements for the analytical review of financial activity.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1999
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for
the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
Combining Balance Sheet as of
June 30, 1999
and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balance
For The Fiscal Year Ended
June 30, 1999
(Unaudited)
Prepared by the Finance Department
Temecula Community Services District
Combining Balance Sheet
As of June 30, 1999
Assets:
Cash and investments
Receivables
Due from other funds
Total assets
Parks & Service Service Service
Recreation Level A Level B Level C
1,040,838
184,505
17,770
1,243,113
$ 30,706 $ 58,614 $ 419,356
14,438 8,863 21,510
$ 45,144 $ 67,477 $ 440,866
Liabilities and fund balances:
Liabilities:
Other current liabilities
Fund balances:
Reserved
Designated
Undesignated
Total fund balances
Total liabilities
and fund balances
$ 196,441
196,441
5,847 $ 2,656 $ 34,058
5,847 2,656 34,058
55,951 1,420
990,721 39,297 64,821 405,388
1,046,672 39,297 64,821 406,808
$ 45,144 $ 67,477 $ 440,866
$ 1,243,113
Please note that these balances are unaudited
Temecula Community Services District
Combining Balance Sheet
As of June 30, 1999
Assets:
Cash and investments
Receivables
Due from other funds
Total assets
Service Service Debt
Level D Level R Service Total
$ 1,246,368 $ 15,244 $ 520,260 $ 3,331,386
75,750 1,270 8,694 315,030
17,770
$ 1,322,118 $ 16,514 $ 528,954 $ 3,664,186
Liabilities and fund balances:
Liabilities:
Other current liabilities
Fund balances:
Reserved
Designated
Undesignated
Total fund balances
Total liabilities
and fund balances
$ 1,119,688 $ 1,358,690
1,119,688 1,358,690
$ 502,690 560,061
202,430 $ 16,514 26,264 1,745,435
202,430 16,514 528,954 2,305,496
$ 1,322,118 $ 16,514 $ 528,954 $ 3,664,186
Please note that these balances are unaudited
Temecula Community Services District
Parks and Recreation
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
Revenues:
Annual
Amended YTD Total
Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity
Special tax $ 2,374,350 $ 2,319,205 $ 2,319,205
TCSD admin fee credit/"REST" 746,790 746,790 746,790
Recreation programs 426,500 458,721 458,721
Investment interest 24,000 43,727 43,727
Miscellaneous 60,970 64,579 64,579
Total Revenues 3,632,610 3,633,022 3,633,022
Expenditures:
Parks and recreation 3,326,358 3,063,245 $ 24,251 3,087,496
Seniors 101,544 84,389 84,389
Community Recreation Center (CRC) 380,384 342, 160 342, 160
Recreation programs 435,723 357,620 5, 170 362,790
Temecula Community Center (TCC) 142,480 113,534 3,314 116,848
Museum 70,790 29,972 23,216 53,188
Non-Departmental 9,200 3,003 3,003
Total Expenditures 4,466,479 3,993,923 55,951 4,049,874
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures
(833,869) (360,901)
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1998
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 1999
1,407,573 1,407,573
573,704 $ 1,046,672
Notes:
(1) The variance is primarily due to greater than expected cash balance.
(2) The variance is primarily due to lower than anticipated persom~el costs.
(3) The variance is primarily due to lower than anticipated persomml and utility costs.
(4) The variance is primarily due to lower than anticipated persomml and various operating costs.
(5) Museum expenditures are lower than anticipated due to the museum not being open by the end of the fiscal year.
Percent
of Budget
98%
100%
108%
182%(1)
106%
100%
93%
83% (2)
90% (3)
83% (2)
82% (4)
75% (5)
33%
91%
Temecula Community Services District
Service Level A
Arterial Street Lights and Median Maintenance
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
Revenues:
Special tax
Investment interest
TCSD ad~nin fee credit/"REST"
Street lighting fees
Miscellaneous
TotalRevenues
Expenditures:
Salaries and wages
Street lighting
Landscape maintenance
Other operating expenditures
Total Expenditures
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures
Begitming Fund Balance, July 1, 1998
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 1999
Annual
Amended YTD
Budget Activity
$ 195,240 $ 190,577
100 215
55,300 55,300
16,160 7,793
15,000
281,800 253,885
2,850 2,804
228,450 204,939
20,000 15,378
31,918 18,843
283,218 241,964
(1,418) 11,921
27,376 27,376
25,958 $ 39,297
Encumbr.
Total
Activity
Percent
of Budget
$ 190,577 98%
215 215%
55,300 100%
7,793 48%
253,885
2,804
204,939
15,378
18,843
241,964
90%
98%
90%
77%
59%
85%
Temecula Community Services District
Service Level B
Residential Street Lights
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
Annual
Amended YTD
Budget Activity
Revenues:
Assessments $ 293,960 $ 293,951
Investment interest 1,500 1,561
TCSD admin fee credit/"REST" 3,410 3,410
Miscellaneous 14,970 25,953
Total Revenues 313,840 324,875
Expenditures:
Salaries and wages 7,430 7,246
Street lighting 321,310 294,448
Miscellaneous 22, 100 5,542
Total Expenditures 350,840 307,236
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (37,000) 17,639
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1998 47,182 47,182
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 1999 $ 10,182 $ 64,821
Encumbr.
Total
Activity
Percent
of Budget
$ 293,951 100%
1,561 104%
3,410 100%
25,953 173%
324,875
7,246
294,448
5,542
307,236
104%
98%
92%
25%
88%
Temecula Community Services District
Service Level C
Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
Annual
Amended YTD
Budget Activity
Revenues:
Assessments $ 557,680 $ 557,382
Investment interest 12,500 15,522
Miscellaneous 21,000 34,311
Total Revenues 591,180 607,215
Expenditures:
Salaries and wages 119,490 109,072
Landscape maintenance 279,550 276,349
Utilities 14 1,440 120,904
Other expenditures 82,728 51,027
Total Expenditures 623,208 557,352
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (32,028) 49,863
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1998 356,945 356,945
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 1999 $ 324,917 $ 406,808
Encumbr.
,420
1,420
Total
Activity
557,382
15,522
34,311
607,215
109,072
277,769
120,904
51,027
558,772
Percent
of Budget
100%
124%
163%
103%
91%
99%
85%
62%
90%
Temecula Community Services District
Service Level D
Refuse Collection, Recycling and Street Sweeping
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
Annual
Amended YTD
Budget Activity
Revenues:
Assessments $ 2,221,560 $ 2,231,153
TCSD admin fee credit/"REST" 44,520 44,520
Investment interest 11,610 18,582
Total Revenues 2,277,690 2,294,255
Expenditures:
Salaries and wages 43,680 36,532
Refuse hauling 2,221,900 2,231,459
Other expenditures 12,110 10,627
Total Expenditures 2,277,690 2,278,618
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures 15,637
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1998 186,793 186,793
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 1999 $ 186,793 $ 202,430
Encumbr.
Total
Activity
$ 2,231,153
44,520
18,582
2,294,255
36,532
2,231,459
10,627
2,278,618
Percent
of Budget
100%
100%
160%
101%
84%
100%
88%
100%
Temecula Community Services District
Service Level R
Streets and Roads
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
Annual
Amended YTD
Budget Activity
Revenues:
Assessments $ 12,800 $ 12,539
Investment interest 80 579
Total Revenues 12,880 13, 118
Expenditures:
Emergency street maintenance 13,050 7,874
Other expenditures 180 83
Total Expenditures 13,230 7,957
Revenues O ver/(Under) Expenditures ( 350 ) 5,161
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1998 11,353 11,353
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 1999 $ 1 i,003 $ 16,514
Encumbr.
Total
Activity
12,539
579
13,118
7,874
83
7,957
Percent
of Budget
98%
724%
102%
60%
46%
60%
Temecula Conununity Services District
Debt Service Fund
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
Revenues:
Operating transfers in
Investment interest
Total Revenues
Expenditures:
Debt service - principal
Debt service - interest
Other expenditures
Total Expenditures
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1998
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 1999
Annual
Amended Total
Budget Activity
Percent
of Budget
$ 529,105 $ 528,954
501,970 501,446 100%
190,000 190,000 100%
305,670 305,665 100%
6,310 5,942 94%
501,980 501,607 100%
(lo) (161)
529,115 529,115
$ 466,370 $ 465,898 100%
35,600 35,548 100%
ITEM 3
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
GENERAL MANAGER
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
General Manager/Board of Directors
erman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
September 14, 1999
Award of Construction Contract for Butterfield Stage Park Improvements
Project PW98-01CSD
PREPARED BY:/}J-JWilliam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Ward Maxwell, Associate Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors:
Award a construction contract for Butterfield Stage Park Improvements, Project No. PW98-
01CSD to JDC, Inc. in amount of $35,007.50 and authorize the President to execute the
contract.
Authorize the General Manger to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $3,500.75, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND: The Community Services Department received a petition in 1997 requesting
that a half court basketball court be installed at Butterfield Stage Park. On March 23, 1999, the
Board of Directors authorized the Public Works Department to prepare construction documents and
solicit construction bids.
This project will provide for a basketball half court, ddnking fountain, concrete sidewalk, drainage and
irrigation system modifications and planting.
Three (3) bids were publicly opened on August 24, 1999, and the results for the bid are as follows:
1. JDC, Inc. $35,007.50
2. S. Parker Engineering Inc. $41,792.50
3. McLaughlin Engineering &Mining, Inc. $45,453.00
Staff has reviewed the bid proposals and found JDC, Inc. to be the lowest responsible bidder for this
project. JDC, Inc. has satisfactory completed other project for other public agencies and/or school
districts in the past.
The specifications allow Forty-Five (45) working days for the completion of this project.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
r: \agdrptO91499\pw98-Olcsd
FISCAL IMPACT: Butterfield Stage Park Improvements project is a Capital Improvement Project
funded through Development Impact Fees - Public Facilities, Development Impact Fees - Parks &
Recreation and TCSD Operating Budget. These funds have been appropriated in Account No. 210-
190-164-5804 for the construction contract of $35,007.50 and the contingency amount of $3,500.75
for a total contract amount of $38,508.25.
ATTACHMENT:
1. CIP Project Description
2. Contract
r: \agdrpt091499\pw98-01 csd
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
CITY OF TEMECULA,
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW98-OfCSD
BUTTERFIELD STAGE PARK IMPROVEMENTS
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 14th day of September, 1999,by and between
the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT", and J.D.C., INC., hereina~er referred to as
"CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That DISTRICT and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually
agree as follows:
1.a.
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract
Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance
Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO.
PW98-01CSD, BUTTERFIELD STAGE PARK IMPROVEMENTS, Insurance Forms, this
Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California
Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically
referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the
Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as
written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California
Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter,
"Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special
Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW98-01CSD,
BUTTERFIELD STAGE PARK IMPROVEMENTS. Copies of these Standard
Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building New, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials,
and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General
Specifications, Special Provision, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO.
PW98-01CSD, BUTTERFIELD STAGE PARK IMPROVEMENTS.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract
Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in
lieu of, such conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in
complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed
and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise
specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and
incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
CONTRACT CA-1 R:cip~prolects~pw98~pw98-01contract
,
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as
binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract
Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed,
shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment,
and all utility and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW98-01CSD, BUTTERFIELD STAGE PARK IMPROVEMENTS
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance
with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents
hereinabove enumerated and adopted by DISTRICT.
DISTRICT APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be
furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and
subject to the approval of DISTRICT or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHDULE. The DISTRICT agrees to pay, and
CONTRACTOR agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the
sum of: THIRTY FIVE THOUSAND SEVEN DOLLARS and FIFTY CENTS ($35,007.50),
the total amount of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed forty-five (45)
working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by DISTRICT.
Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by DISTRICT.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that
the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order,
changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as
established by the City Council.
PAYMENTS
LUMP SUM BID SCEHDULE:
A,
Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to
the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the
work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its
accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the
City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's
payment requests.
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days
after submission of a payment request to the DISTRICT, the CONTRACTOR shall
be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed
according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or
about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses.
The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be
CONTRACT CA-2 R:\BID-DOCS\MASTERS~contracl
made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR
filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the DISTRICT on
forms provided by the DISTRICT.
Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law,
accompanied by a certificate signed by the General Manager, stating that the work
for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms
of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms
of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as
an acceptance of any part of the work.
Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30)
days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code
Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference.
In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code, a reduction in the
retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the
Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project
is more than 50% complete.
WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is
recorded, the DISTRICT shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure
warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the
following schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
$25,000 0 $75,000
RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE
180 days 3%
$75,00- $500,000
180 days
$2,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of $75,000
Over $500,000
One Year
$10,750 + 1% of amount
in excess of $500,000
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government
Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to DISTRICT the sum
of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed
beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be
deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum
shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR.
CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated
damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or
negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by DISTRICT.
CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify DISTRICT of any such delay.
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6
above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to DISTRICT, in writing, all claims for compensation
as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount
of the
CONTRACT CA-3 R:\BID-DOCS\MASTERS%contract
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of
all claims against the DISTRICT related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be
required to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for
payment.
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of
the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per
diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each
craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director
of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk.
Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR
shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing
wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Section
1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each
laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for
any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation
of the provisions of the Contract.
TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or
in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone.
CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend DISTRICT, its
officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or
indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the DISTRICT.
The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the DISTRICT for
any and all costs incurred by the DISTRICT as a result of Stop Notices filed against the
project. The DISTRICT shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final
payments due to the DISTRICT.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or
representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to DISTRICT's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable
treatment with respect thereto.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any District officer or employee,
or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been employed
by the DISTRICT within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the General Manager, its affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors
CONTRACT CA-4 R:\BID-DOCS\MASTERS~conIract
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against
the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has
been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge
that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely
performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof,
including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY.
BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part
thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable
times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner
as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and
acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final
inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national
origin, color, sex age, or handicap.
GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the
State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to
this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning
this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with
geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the
parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be
entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation.
ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor
is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-
336, as amended.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents,
and to the CITY addressed as follows:
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
CONTRACT CA-5 R:\BID-DOCS\MASTERS%conIracI
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the
date first above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR
J.D.C., inc.
P.O. Box 3448
Rancho Cucamonga 91729
(909) 899-4841
By:
Jim DeArmond
DATED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Print or type TITLE
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Jeff Comerchero, President
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
Susan W, Jones, CMC/AAE, City Clerk
CONTRACT CA-6 R \BID+DOCS\MASTERS~contra:'
ITEM 4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
E
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Board of Directors
J~Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
September 14, 1999
SUBJECT:
Park and Slope Area Tree Trimming Maintenance Services
Contract
PREPARED BY:
H~KKevin T. Harrington, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
1. Award the Tree Maintenance Services contract to West Coast Arborists, Inc. for
$50,000.00.
2. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $5,000, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND: In June, 1999 Request for Proposals (RFP) and specifications for the
Citywide Tree Trimming Contract were sent to twelve (12) tree trimming contractors. On July 6,
1999 three (3) bids were received for Citywide tree maintenance services.
These lump sum proposals submitted are as follows:
1. West Coast Arborists
2. Gold Bear Arborists
3. J. Williams Landscape
The work to be performed includes Class 1 tree trimming, tree and stump removals, root pruning,
tree planting and emergency work call-outs. This work is necessary to maintain park and slope
area trees, which are part of the City's Urban Forest. The contractor will inventory serviced trees
by name, size and locations.
Staff have reviewed the bid proposal from West Coast Arborists and found it to be acceptable.
West Coast Arborists has performed work in the past for the City of Temecula and we have found
their work to be satisfactory. West Coast Arborists are currently providing tree maintenance
services for the Public Works Department under another agreement.
A copy of the proposals are attached (Exhibit "A" for review).
R:\HARRINGK\AGENDA.RPT\Park & Slope Tree Trimming.doc
FISCAL IMPACT: Sufficient funds are available in the TCSD Annual Operating Budget in
accounts 190-180-999-5415 and 193-180-999-5415. The contract amount for Fiscal Year
1999-00 is $55,000.00, which includes the base contract of $50,000.00 plus the 10%
contingency of $5,000.00.
Attachments: 1 ) Exhibit "A"
2) Contract
R:\HARRINGK\AGENDA. RPT\Park & Slope Tree Trimming.doc
EXHIBIT "A"
R:\HARRINGK\AGENDA. RPTXPark & Slope Tree Trimming.doc
,~1R-25-59
13,26
FROM,CITY OF TEMECULA
ID,9096946477
CITY OF TEMECULA
TREE TRIMMING RFP
BID PRICES FOR PROPOSED TREE TRIMMING CONTRACT
PACE 14/19
BASED ON APPROXIMATELY 7.500 TREES IN VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF TEMECULA
STREET TREE TRIMMING -:CLEARANCE 'mue $ each
14.00
STREET TREE AESTHETIC TRIMMING - FULL TRIM
28.00
PALM TREE TRIMMING
28.00
COMPLETE TREE & STUMP REMOVAL
15.00
STUMP REMOVAL
4.00
ROOT PRUNING WITHOUT ROOT BARRIER
60.00
ROOT PRUNING WITH ROOT BARRIER $
{10' X 18' DEEP ROOT OR EQUIVALENT) 120.00
TREE PLANTING:
each
each
diameter inch
diameter inch
15 9a/. w/root barrier
15 gal. RIo root tiNrim'
24 inch box w/root barrier
95.00 each
80.00 em
195.00 each
34 inch box RIo root barrier
watering
CREW RENTAL - 3 MEN. AERIAL UNIT, DUMP TRUCX &
CHIPPER
160.00 each
260.00 de
95.00 hour
CREW RENTAL - 2 MEN. AERIAL UNIT. DUMP TRUCK & * 63.33 hmar
CREW RENTAL - 1 MAN 6 31.67 hour
EMERGENCY WORK CALL OUT - 3 MEN INCLUDING ALL ~ hour
I NECESSARy F;QUIPMENT, DliPOSAL FEC~. AND ZERO 200.00
MATERIAL MARK-UP
Attach a statement of qualificaljons oudinin9 ~he contractors corporate profile and
con;ractor's experience in providing tree trimming services as required by the RFP.
2. Attach a list of clien~ references.
Seleo~ed corTUaotor will provide the following documentation upon execu~on of the contract:
Certificate of Insurance as outlined in the requirements in attachment B.
13
Patrick Mahoney, President
07/02/99
JUN-25-88
13,14 FROH,CZTY OF TEHECULA lD,EIOBE846477
CITY QF TEMECULA
TREE TRIMMING RFP
BID PRICES FOR PROPOSED TREE TRIMMING CONTRACT
PAGE
14/IB
BASED ON APPROXIMATELY 7,500 TREES IN VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF TEMECULA
STREET TREE TRIMMING - C%Lq, RAN~ Tram
I STREET TREE AESTHETIC TRIMMING - FULl. TRIM
t PALM TRFJ[ TRIMMING
JCOMPLET! TREE & STUMP REMOVAL
ISTUMp RJEMOVAL
ROOT PRUNING WITHOUT ROOT BARRIER
ROOT PRUNING WITH ROOT BARRIER
i(lO' X 18' DEEP ROOT OR I~ClUNALENT')
TREE PLANTING:
26.00 PER TREE ea~
30_. 00 PER TREE eaeh
24.00 PER TP33E mmeh
600.00 PER REMOVAL dkn!lte b~h
24- - '~n"
200.00 PER GRIND d~rnmtee b~
24" - 30"
150.00 AVERAGE I each
242.00 AVERAGE each
15 9eL w/root
15 Ilal. wlo ro~t bMrim
J24 b~ box w/rNt
24 in~ ~ wlo
wet~ing
C~ ~TAL
C~W ~TAL ·
JCt~
~T~ M~-UF
159.89 PER INSTALL each ,.
65.00 PER INSTALL each
357.00 PER INSTALL seth
240.00 PER INSTALL each
125.00 PER DAY
day
295.00 PER HOUR heMr
250.00 PER HOUR I beer
45.00 PER HOUR I ~
4 42.00" PER HOUR ~ h4N~ -
I
1. Attach a statement of qualificaUons outlining the contractors
corporate. profile and
con~ractor's experience in providing flee trimming services as required by the RFP. "
Attach a list of client references. ' ~.{'~i:~:~::~ ....
e
Selecmd contractor will provide the following documentation upon execul~on of the contract:
Certificate of Insurance as outJined in ~he requirements in attachment B.
13
J. WILLIA}(S, PRESIDENT- 7/02/99
Si~e '
Name i:el,~;~ ,/. ......
J. WtlliRm. Landscape, Inc.
~TLJH ~5 ' 99 ~3: ~gPM
CITY OF TEMECULA
TREE TRIMMING RFP
i BID PRICES FOR PROPOSED TREE TRIMMING CONTRACT
i
I
I
I
i
i
I
I
I
t
I
P.14/19
BASED ON APPROXIMATELY 7.500 TREES IN VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE CFrY OF TEMECULA
!'i~:. '.'i~!l':;:~:i:!~.:'..,.'--'.i~F' .:.4i~.?~)".i'. ........:...., i!!~i~:.~U~,~.i~;...E;~:~.,:.t..i.~K;?..,a ~'!~i.~i~.:.'!;..~i~ '~::" 'i~! '=" '..:..%~; -"~ ............i ..............'.=/~.:S,'L '=+..~ ~":~ ~=, =~"!:~., ~ ...........x.~ ......, .................._
STREET TREE .TRIMMING - Ct.F. ARANCE TRN $ 14.00 each
STREET TREE AESTHETIC TRIMMING - FuLL TRIM ~ 38.4~ each"
PALM TREE TRIMMING $ 10.00 each
COMPLETE TREE & STUMP REMOVAL
STUr,,~P REMOVAL
ROOT PRUNING WITHOUT ROOT BARRIER
ROOT PRUNING WITH ROOT BARRIER
(10' X lI' DEEP ROOT OR EQUNALENTI
TREE PLANTING:
15 gal. w/roo~ barrier
15 gel; wlo root barrier
6.50
2.80
85.00
diameter inch
diameter inch
each
135.00
115.00
69.00
each
24 incl~ box w/root ba,ie ~ 260.00
24 inch box wio ioot bmier $ ~190.00
waterir',g $ 365. O0
CREW.RENTAL '-: MEN. AERmL Unfr, DUMP TRUCK & $ 165.00
CHIPPER
each
each
each
day
hour
CREW RENTAL - 2 MEN. AERIAL UNIT, DUMP TRUCK & $ 130.00 hour
CHIPPEr=
CREW RENTAL -1 MAN
$
40.00
hour
hour
EMERGENCY WORK CALL OUT - 3 MEN INCLUDING ALL ~ 240.00 J
NECEISARY EQUIPMENT, DISPOSAL FEE~. AND 2~RO
MATB:IIAL MARK-UP
I 3.
Attach .a statement of qualifications outlining the contractors corporate profile and
contractor's experience in providing tree trimming services as required by the RFP.
Attach a list of client referenc, es.
Sele~;{ed contractor will provide the following documentation. upon execution of the Certificate of Insurance as outlined in the requirements in attachment B.
Heather A. Kells
Contracts blana uly 2, 1999
Nam ,fie/ t~- .."
contact
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONTRACT
FOR
TREE MAINTENANCE SERVICES
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 15th day of September, 1999, by and between
the Temecula Community Services District, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as
"DISTRICT", and West Coast Arborists, Inc., herein referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That DISTRICT and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually
agree as follows:
1.a.
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract
Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance
Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled TREE
MAINTENANCE SERVICES, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and
amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard
Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical
Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint
Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter bf the American Associated
General Contractors of California (hereina~er, "Standard Specifications") as amended by
the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for TREE
MAINTENANCE SERVICES. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available
from the publisher:
Building New, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials,
and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General
Specifications, Special Provision, and Technical Specifications for TREE
MAINTENANCE SERVICES.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract
Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in
lieu of, such conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in
complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed
and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise
specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and
incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be
as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other
Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
R:\HARRINGK%AGREEMNT\Tree Maintenance Services Contract 99-00,doc
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed,
shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable
equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following:
TREE MAINTENANCE SERVICES
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict
accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract
Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by DISTRICT.
DISTRICT APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be
furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and
subject to the approval of DISTRICT or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. The DISTRICT agrees to pay, and
CONTRACTOR agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the
sum of: FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS and NO CENTS ($50,000.00) the total amount
of the base bid.
TERM: The term of the contract shall commence upon award by the District ahd
continue through June 30, 2000. The District reserves the option to extend the
contract(s) for an additional three (3) years. No price adjustments will occur during the
first thirty-six (36) months of this agreement. Upon request of the contractor and
agreement by the District, the item prices may be adjusted by the amount equal to the
increase or decrease, during the previous twelve (12) months, in the Riverside, San
Bernardino ALL Urban Consumers Index to determine the percentage of increase or
decrease, the term "previous twelve months" shall mean the twelve (12) month period
ending June 30th Of that year, or if not available, the prior month.
CONTRACTOR: The work to be performed shall be completed within THIRTY FIVE (35)
CALENDAR' DAYS after execution of contract and Notice to Proceed has been issued.
Work shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by the District.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the District Board of
Directors, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the District Board of
Directors to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to
exceed the contingency as established by the District Board of Directors.
PAYMENTS
LUMP SUM BID SCHEDULE:
Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to
the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the
work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its
accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the
City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's
payment requests.
\\TEMEC_FS1 O1 \VOL1 \DEPTS\CSD\HARRINGK\AGREEMNT\Tree Maintenance Services Contract 99-O0.doc
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days
after submission of a payment request to the DISTRICT, the CONTRACTOR
shall be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work
completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be
submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the
work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof
unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment
and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final
Release with the DISTRICT on forms provided by the DISTRICT.
Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law,
accompanied by a certificate signed by the General Manager, stating that the
work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the
terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under
the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be
considered as an acceptance of any part of the work.
Do
Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty
(30) days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract
Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference.
In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code, a reduction in the
retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the
Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project
is more than 50% complete.
WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is
recorded, the DISTRICT shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure
warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the
following schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
$25,OOO 0 $75,000
RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE
180 days 3%
$75,00- $500,000
180 days
$2,250 + 2% ofamountin
excess of $75,000
Over $500,000
One Year
$10,750 + 1% ofamount
in excess of $500,000
SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The District may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this contract, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at least ten
(10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall
immediately cease all work under this Contract, unless the notice provides otherwise. If
the District suspends or terminates a portion of this Contract such suspension or
termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Contract.
\\TEMEC_FS101 \VOL1 \DEPTS\CSD\HARRINGK\AGREEMNT\Tree Maintenance Services Contract 99-00.doc
10.
11.
12.
13.
b. In the event this Contract is terminated pursuant to this Section, the District shall
pay to the Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of
termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the District. Upon
termination of the Contract pursuant to this Section, the Contractor will submit an invoice
to the District pursuant to Section 6.
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph
6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to DISTRICT, in writing, all claims for
compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has
disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each
payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the DISTRICT related to the
payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release, and
indemnity agreement with each claim for payment.
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of
the State of California, the District Board of Directors has obtained the general prevailing
rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality
for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from
the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the
City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula.
CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the
adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the
provisions of Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
DISTRICT, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for
each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing
rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him,
in violation of the provisions of the Contract.
TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction
or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR
alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend DISTRICT,
its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of
persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly
or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted
by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigation arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the DISTRICT.
The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the DISTRICT
for any and all costs incurred by the DISTRICT as a result of Stop Notices filed against
the project. The DISTRICT shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final
payments due to the DISTRICT.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents,
or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to DISTRICT's
employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or
securing favorable treatment with respect thereto.
\\TEMEC_FS 101 \VOL1 \DEPTS\CSD\HARRINGK\AGREEMNT\Tree Maintenance Services Contract 99-00.doc
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any District officer or
employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and
Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR furlher warrants that no person in its
employ has been employed by the DISTRICT within one year of the date of the Notice
Inviting Bids.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the General Manager, its affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors
upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against
the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has
been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
NOTICE TO DISTRICT OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has
knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the
timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice
thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to DISTRICT.
BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part
thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable
times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the
DISTRICT.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by DISTRICT and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner
as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and
acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final
inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will
not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion,
national origin, color, sex age, or handicap.
GOVERNING LAW. The District and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of
the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the
parties to this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation
concerning this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district
court with geographic jurisdiction over the Temecula Community Services District of the
City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this Contract,
the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and
reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation.
ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor
is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-
336, as amended.
\\TEMEC FS101 \VOL1 \DEPTS\CSD\HARRINGK\AGREEMNT\Tree Maintenance Services Contract 99-00.doc
22.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents,
and to the DISTRICT addressed as follows:
Herman Parker, Community Services Director
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the
date first above written.
DATED: CONTRACTOR '.
WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC.
2200 E. Via Burton Street
Anaheim, CA 92806
(714) 991-1900
DATED:
By:
Patrick O. Mahoney, President
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Jeff Comerchero, President
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
\\TEMEC_FS 101 \VOL 1 \DEPTS\CSD\HARRINGK\AGREEMNT\Tree Maintenance Services Contract 99-00.doc
ITEM 5
APPRO~f~~
CITY ATTORNEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
erman Parker, Director of Community Services
September 14, 1999
City of Temecula Wall of Honor
PREPARED BY:
Todd Holmes, Development Services Administrator
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors:
1. Approve a procedure for the establishment and continuing operation of the City of Temecula Wall
of Honor.
DISCUSSION: The Wall of Honor is intended to honor and recognize individuals who
have made an outstanding contribution to the City of Temecula. The names of the designated
individuals will be permanently displayed in a prominent location: The Tony and Mildred Tobin
Rotunda in the Temecula Valley Museum. A Subcommittee, which included Council Member Jeff
Comerchero and Commissioners Jim Meyler and Henri Miller, was formed to develop a procedure
for the establishment and continuing operation of the City of Temecula Wall of Honor.
On August 9, 1999 the Community Services Commission approved the Subcommittee's
recommended procedure for the establishment and continuing operation of a Wall of Honor for the
City of Temecula. The Commission also approved a set of design guidelines for the construction
of the Wall of Honor. The procedure, which included the guidelines, is attached for your review and
approval.
The procedure calls for the establishment of a permanent Wall of Honor Subcommittee to review
nominations and rank the top nominees. This Subcommittee will be made up of the following
individuals: The Temecula Good Neighbor and the Wall of Honor honoree(s) from the prior year, one
City Council Member, and one member from each of the three City Commissions. During the first
two years the honoree(s) will not participate. In the first year there will be no prior year honoree(s)
and in the second year there will be ten prior honorees. The Subcommittee decided that inclusion
of the ten honorees in the selection process would be unwieldy. The review and ranking will be done
individually by the Subcommittee members and the results will be mailed in to City Hall and staff will
tabulate the results; the Subcommittee will not meet. The top ranked nominee(s) will be taken
forward for approval to the Community Services Commission and the City Council.
The Subcommittee recommended that the procedure be returned to the Commission in July 2000
for review and possible modification. The review would factor in the experience gained in the
inaugural selection process. The initial group of honorees will not be selected based on a threshold
(please see the attached procedure). The threshold number is not set in the attached procedure,
so the Commission will need to designate the threshold as part of the overall review in July 2000.
FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of constructing the Wall of Honor is included as a part of the
Museum improvements. The annual administrative and maintenance costs will be nominal.
Attachments:
Wall of Honor Procedure
Wall of Honor Concept Sketch
CITY OF TEMECULA
PROCEDURE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT AND CONTINUING OPERATION
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA WALL OF HONOR
9/14/99
WALL OF HONOR
To honor and recognize individuals who have made an outstanding contribution
to the City of Temecula over a significant period of time. To commemorate the
contribution, the names of these individuals will be placed on a wall of honor in
the Tony and Mildred Tobin Rotunda in the Temecula Valley Museum.
BASIC CRITERIA FOR SELECTION
To be eligible, an individual must have made a major contribution to improve the
quality of life for the residents of the City of Temecula over a significant period of
time. Members of service clubs, City Councilmembers and Commissioners, City
Staff, and residents are all eligible for nomination.
METHODOLOGY
Names will be added to the wall on an annual basis. The inaugural group of
honorees will be selected and placed on the wall when the wall is dedicated.
This group will consist of 10 individuals. One or more honorees will be placed
on the wall in each succeeding year.
· The City will solicit nominations for the Wall of Honor each September.
Announcements will be placed in local newspapers and posted on public
buildings. The process will also be publicized by mailings to community
groups and announcements by elected and appointed officials of the City.
· Anyone can submit a nominee or nominees utilizing a form provided by the
City. The form will require some background information and a shod
statement (not to exceed fifty words) in support of the nomination.
· A Wall of Honor Subcommittee will review the nomination forms. This
Subcommittee will be made up of the following individuals: The Temecula
Good Neighbor and the Wall of Honor honoree(s) from the prior year, one
City Councilmember, and one member from each of the three City
Commissions. The Subcommittee will not meet; copies of the nominations
will be mailed to each member along with a ballot. Each Subcommittee
member will rank all the nominees in numerical order from one to the total
number of nominations, with one being the lowest ranking. The
Subcommittee will mail the completed ballot to the City and staff will tabulate
the results. The points assigned to each of the nominees will be totaled and
the results compared to a minimum threshold number. All nominees who
CITY OF TEMECULA
PROCEDURE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT AND CONTINUING OPERATION
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA WALL OF HONOR
9/14/99
Page Two
meet or exceed the threshold number will be recommended for placement on
the Wall of Honor and taken forward to the Community Services Commission
for approval. The Commission's nominee(s) will be presented to the City
Council for final approval.
· It is anticipated that the final approval of the nominee(s) and the induction
ceremony will take place in December.
· The inaugural group will be selected in the manner described above, except
that the ten individuals with the highest number of points will be placed on the
Wall of Honor. No threshold will be applied to the inaugural group.
· A threshold has not been included in this procedure. Subsequent to the
inaugural selection, a threshold will need to be set before the next round of
balloting.
· During the first two years, the Wall of Honor Subcommittee will not include the
prior year's honoree. In the first year there will be no prior year honoree(s)
and in the second year there will be ten honorees. The inclusion of the ten
honorees in the selection process would be unwieldy.
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
· The Wall of Honor will be located in the Tony and Mildred Tobin Rotunda at
the Temecula Valley Museum. The Wall of Honor will occupy one wall panel
to the left of the doorway into the exhibit area.
· Each name will be placed on a large acrylic panel mounted on the wall of the
rotunda. The panel will appear as if the names were sandblasted on a sheet
of glass. The panel will include large lettering stating "City of Temecula Wall
of Honor" with a brief explanation about the purpose of the wall. This display
configuration will be integrated into the design of the other elements in the
rotunda.
· A short statement describing each honoree and the nature of the her/his
contribution will be placed in an archive and/or in an interactive computer
station at the museum.
living off
~hfi Land
Creating the
Mmum
Rollroad
Croe~roacla of
Tmnmporfa~on and
Comm~roe
II
CHy Wall of Hofior
Cr~o~ng · Cemmun~
Old Town
Mmo
L
I
Intera~~vfi
idap
I
i, and: Our
Teme~ulo Volley
iauNum
Inffaclua~ry
V1cleo
They P~mdthl~
Shop [~ntranae
Enh'~nce
ITEM 6
CITY ATTOR
DIRECTOR OF FIN
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Board of Directors
t ~.," erman D. Parker, Acting Director of Community Services
September 14, 1999
SUBJECT:
Mobile Recreation Program Update
PREPARED BY:
Julie Crowe-Pelletier, Recreation Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors:
Receive and file a report on the Mobile Recreation Program known as Rec R.O.C.K.s.
DISCUSSION: Staff members within the Recreation Division are pleased to
announce that the Mobile Recreation Program known as Rec R.O.C.K.s (Recreation
Opportunities for Our City's Kids") was extremely successful. The overall purpose of the
program was to provide a variety of recreation opportunities during the summer months to
Temecula's youth ages seven to fourteen (7-14).
This exciting program was offered at (4) park sites throughout the community. The four (4)
park site locations were Margarita Park, Winchester Creek Park, Riverton Park, and Pala Park.
The program was implemented Tuesdays through Fridays from 9:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Staffing
included Recreation Leader, Jimmy Duty and Recreation Assistant, Judith Howell. Staff
rotated to two parks per day for a 2~/2 hour time period, twice per week. Monday served as
a day for staff to prepare programs and activities, as well as re-stock the City's vehicle used
to transport both staff and supplies.
This successful drop-in mobile recreation program began on July 1, 1999 and concluded on
August 20, 1999. Although the duration of the program was short-term, both children, as well
as their parents welcomed the opportunities the program offered. Rec R.O.C.K.S.s provided
organized sport programs, art and craft projects, theme activities, as well as fun and exciting
games and contests to approximately 15 - 40 youth per day.
Upon the scheduled completion of this seasonal program, staff took the opportunity to
complete an overall evaluation of the program. The evaluation concluded that this type of
mobile recreation program is very beneficial to the community by enabling youth throughout
the community to participate in organized, as well as supervised recreation programs in
neighborhood park settings close to their homes.
FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost for this eight week summer program was
95,41 5.00. This provided for the two part-time staff, supplies and equipment.
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM I
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
JULY 13, 1999
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at
P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Ford, Roberts,
Stone, and Lindemans.
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBER: None.
Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1
7:42
Revision of the Residential Improvement Proqram, the First-Time Homebuyer Program,
And the Employee Relocation Pro.qram
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
1.2
1.3
Revision of the Fa?ade
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Approve the revised Program Parameters for the Residential Improvement
Program;
Approve the revised Program Parameters for the First-Time Homebuyer
Program;
Approve the revised Program Parameters for the Employee Relocation Program.
mprovement Proqram
Approve the recommended revisions to the Fac;ade Improvement Program.
Agency Member Stone abstained with regard to this item.
3 Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with Hopkins Real Estate Group
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with Hopkins Real Estate Group
for the potential redevelopment of the Poole Property.
R\Minutes\071399
Agency Member Stone abstained with regard to this item.
4
Granting of an Easement for Southern California Edison
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA GRANTING AN EASEMENT FOR
ELECTRICAL SUPPLY AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS
FACILITATING INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
RELATING TO THE MISSION VILLAGE AFFORDABLE
HOUSING PROJECT
This item was removed from the Consent Calendar.
Chairman Lindemans relayed staff's recommendation to remove Consent Calendar No. 4.
MOTION: Agency Member Comerchero moved to remove Consent Calendar Item No. 4,
and to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-3. The motion was seconded by Agency
Member Ford.
For the record, Chairman Lindemans relayed his strong opposition with respect to Consent
Calendar No. 3.
At this time, voice vote was taken reflecting approval with the exception of Chairman
Lindemans who voted n__g_o with respect to Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1.2 and 3, and
Agency Member Stone who abstained with respect to Consent Calendar Item Nos. 2 and 3.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
No comments.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No comments.
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
No comments.
R\Minutes\071399 '~
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:45 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, July 27, 1999, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California.
Karel Lindemans, Chairman
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Agency Secretary
R\Minutes\071399 3
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
JULY 27, 1999
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at
9:09 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Ford, Roberrs,
Stone, and Lindemans.
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBER: None.
Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Grantin.q of an Easement for Storm Drain Improvements for the First Street Brid.qe
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99-11
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA GRANTING AN EASEMENT FOR STORM
DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO THE FIRST STREET
BRIDGE
MOTION: Agency Member Comerchero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The
motion was seconded by Agency Member Roberts and voice vote reflected approval with the
exception of Agency Member Stone who abstained.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No comments.
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
No comments.
Minutes.rda\072799 1
ADJOURNMENT
At 9:10 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjoumed to
Tuesday, August 10, 1999, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Ddve,
Temecula, California.
Karel F. Lindemans, Chairman
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk/Agency Secretary
[SEAL]
Minutes.rda~072799 2
ITEM 2
APPROVAL
I A
O TY TTORNEY
DIREGTOR OF FINA
GITY MANAGER
TEMEGULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
Executive Director/Agency Members
John Meyer, Housing and Redevelopment Manager
DATE:
September 14,1999
SUBJECT: Purchase and Sale Agreements for Residential Sites in the Pujol Area
Prepared By: Joyce Powers, Senior Redevelopment Analyst
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "PURCHASE AND SALE
AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS" FOR CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 28735 PUJOL STREET IN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA
2. Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "PURCHASE AND SALE
AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS" FOR CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 28496 PUJOL STREET IN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA
3. Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "PURCHASE AND SALE
\\TEMEC_FSI01WOLI\DEPTS\REDEVXPowersjXAcquisitions\Staff report PSAs 9-14-99.doc
1
AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS" FOR CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 28516 PUJOL STREET IN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA
4. Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "PURCHASE AND SALE
AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS" FOR THE ACQUISITION OF
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE 28500 BLOCK OF PUJOL
STREET (APN 922-053-008) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA
BACKGROUND:
In an effort to implement the General Plan Housing Element and the Redevelopment
Implementation Plan, staff has pursued the acquisition of certain parcels of land in the Pujol
area as directed by the Agency Board dudng Closed Session.
Based on fair market value appraisals, staff has negotiated the following purchase pdces for the
subject properties:
28735 Pujol Street (APN 922-062-019) Ladanyi
Purchase Pdce: $47,000
=
28496 Pujol Street (APN 922-052-005) Viefhaus/Barker
Purchase Pdce: $132,500, plus relocation costs in the amount of $22,500
28516 Pujol Street (APN 922-053-007) Irwin
Purchase Pdce: $140,000, plus relocation costs in the amount of $22,500
=
Vacant parcel in the 28500 block of Pujol Street (APN 922-053-008) Otto
Purchase Pdce: $80,000
Based on eadier Agency Board direction, the Executive Director was authorized to prepare the
necessary purchase documents subsequent to the completion of the required Phase 1
Environmental Site Assessments. The Board further authorized expenditures of up to $398,650
from the RDA Housing Fund for acquisition, demolition, relocation, environmental assessment
reviews, and closing costs. Staff was also directed to return to open session for approval of the
Purchase and Sale Agreements.
A Phase I Environmental Assessments have subsequently been conducted on all parcels to
determine the presence of any hazardous waste or unacceptable soil conditions. Each report
revealed no evidence of recognized soil conditions in connection with the property and no
further action is required.
Therefore, staff recommends the adoption of the four listed Resolutions approving the
respective attached Purchase and Sale Agreements.
R:\Powcrsj\Acquisitions\Staff report PSAs 9-14-99.doc
2
FISCAL IMPACT:
The $398,650 will be funded by the RDA Low to Moderate Housing Fund. One million dollars
has been approved in the FY 99-00 Capital Improvement Program for Affordable Housing Pujol
Neighborhood.
ATTACHMENTS:
2.
3.
4.
Resolution No. 99-
Resolution No. 99-
Resolution No. 99-
Resolution No. 99-
__ and Purchase and Sale Agreement- Ladanyi
and Purchase and Sale Agreement - Viefhaus/Barker
__ and Purchase and Sale Agreement - InNin
and Purchase and Sale Agreement - Otto
\\TEMEC_FS 101 \VOL 1 \ DEPTS\REDEV\PowersjXAcquisitions\Staff report PSAs 9-14- 99. doc
3
ATTACHMENT NO. I
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVEL-
OPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT
CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "PI~CHASE AND SAI,E AGREE-
MENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS" FOR ACQUISITION OF
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 28735 PUJOL STREET IN
TIlE CITY OF TEMECULA
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA DOES IIEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula
hereby finds, determines and declares that:
a. The Agency is currently implementing the Redevelopment Plan for
Redevelopment Project No. 1--1988, originally approved by the Board of Supervisors of
Riverside County on July 12, 1988 prior to incorporation of the City of Temecula and
subsequently approved and transferred to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Temecula on April 9, 1991 (the "Plan").
b. The Agency proposes to purchase the property described in the "Purchase
and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions" attached hereto as Exhibit A. and located
at 28735 Pujol Street in the City of Temecula (APN 922-062-019) for redevelopment
purposes consistent with the Agency authority under the Plan and the Community
Redevelopment Act, Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.
c. The Agreement is consistent with the Plan and with the Implementation
Plan adopted by the Agency.
d. The Agency Board has duly considered all terms and conditions of the
proposed Agreement and believes that such agreement is in the best interests of the Agency
and City and the health, safety, and welfare of its residents, and in accord with the public
purposes and provisions of applicable State and local law requirements.
e. This action is being undertaken pursuant to the Plan for which a full and
complete Environmental Impact Report was prepared and certified prior to adoption of the
Plan. Moreover the acquisition of property by itself will have no impact on the
environment as it is simply the change in ownership of the property without a change in
the physical condition of the property. None of the conditions described in 14 Cat.
Admin. Code § 15162 are found to exist. Therefore, pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
R:\powersj\acquisitions\landanyi.reso
and, specifically, 14 Cat. Admin. Code §§ 15162 and 15180, neither a subsequent nor a
supplemental Environmental Impact Report is required for the subject agreement.
Section 2. The Board of Directors of the Redevelopmere Agency of the City of Temecula
hereby approves that certain "Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions" between the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, a public body corporate and politic, and Irene
Landanyi, which Purchase Agreement is dated as of September 14, 1999. The Chairperson of
the Agency is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Agreemere on behalf of the Agency.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula on September 14, 1999.
Karel F. Lindemans, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
Acting Agency Secretary/City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:\powersj\acquisitions\landanyi.reso
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
sS
I, Susan W. Jones, Acting Secretary of the Redevelopmere Agency, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. RDA 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Temecula Redevelopmere Agency at a regular meeting thereof held on the
14 th day of September , 1999, by the following vote:
AYES:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
NOES:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
ABSENT:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
Acting Agency Secretary/City Clerk
R:\powersjkacquisitionsklandanyi.reso
EXHIBIT "A"
OF
ATTACHMENT NO. I
PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT
AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS
THIS PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW
INSTRUCTIONS ("Agreement") is dated and entered into as of September 14, 1999 by and
between Irene Ladanyi ("Seller"), and the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, a public body, corporate and politic ("Agency"), and constitutes both an agreement to
purchase and sell real property between the parties and the parties' escrow instructions directed to
First American Title Insurance Company ("Escrow Holder"). In consideration of the premises
operative provisions and the recitals set forth in this Agreement, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Recitals. The parties hereto represent to each other that the following
facts and purposes are true and correct:
a. On May 10, 1999, 1999 the Agency delivered Seller an offer (the
"Offer") to purchase the real property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a pan
hereof (the "Property").
b. Following delivery of the Offer Agency and Seller negotiated terms by
which the Agency would acquire the Property so as to avoid eminent domain proceedings and now
desire to set forth in this Agreement the terms and conditions of the Agency 's acquisition of the
Property.
c. Agency intends to use the Property for public purposes allowed by law,
including, but not limited to, subsequent conveyance of the Property to other govemmental entities
for public purposes.
2. Purchase and Sale. On the Close of Escrow (as herein defined), Seller agrees
to sell the Property to Agency, and Agency agrees to buy the Property from Seller, on the terms and
conditions hereinafter set forth.
3. Purchase Price. The purchase price for the Property to be paid by Agency is
the sum of Forty-seven Thousand Dollars ($47,000.00) (the "Purchase Price"), which sum shall be
paid in full in cash on the Close of Escrow. The Agency will pay all closing costs.
4. Title and Title Insurance. Upon the Opening of Escrow, Escrow Holder
shall order from First American Title Company ("Title Company") a title commitment for the
Property. Escrow Holder shall also request two copies each of all instruments identified as
exceptions on said title commitment. Upon receipt of the foregoing, Escrow Holder shall deliver
these instruments and the title commitment to Agency and Seller. Agency's fee title to the Property
shall be insured at the Close of Escrow by a CLTA Owner' s Standard Coverage Policy of Title
Insurance in the amount of the Purchase Price (the "Policy"). The Policy of title insurance provided
for pursuant to this Section shall insure Agency's fee interest in the Property free and clear of all
8130199 RDA Purchase Agreemere
liens, encumbrances, restrictions, and rights-of-way of record, subject only to the following
permitted conditions of title (" Permitted Title Exceptions"):
a. The applicable zoning, building and development regulations of any
municipality, county, state or federal jurisdiction affecting the Property; and
b. Those non-monetary exceptions appmved by Agency within fifteen
(15) business days after the date Agency receives the title commitmere and legible copies of all
instruments noted as exceptions therein. If Agency unconditionally disapproves any such excep-
tions, Escrow shall thereupon terminate, all funds deposited therein shall be refunded to Agency
(less Agency's share of escrow cancellation charges), and this Agreemere shall be of no further force
or effect. If Agency conditionally disapproves any such exceptions, then Seller shall use Seller' s
best efforts to cause such exceptions to be removed by the Close of Escrow. If such conditionally
disapproved non-monetary exceptions are not removed by the Close of Escrow, Agency may, at
Agency's option, either accept the Property subject to such encumbrances, or terminate the Escrow
and receive a refund of all funds deposited into Escrow (less Agency's share of escrow cancellation
charges), if any, and this Agreement shall thereupon be of no further force or effect. At the Close
of Escrow, Agency's fee title to the Property shall be free and clear of all monetary encumbrances.
5. Grant Deed. Seller covenants and agrees to deposit with Escrow Holder prior
to the Close of Escrow a Grant Deed duly executed and acknowledged by Seller, granting and
conveying to Agency the Property. The Grant Deed shall be in a form satisfactory to Agency and
Agency's counsel and shall be accepted by Agency prior to recording.
6. Authorization to Record Docnments and Disburse Funds. a. Escrow
Holder is hereby authorized to record the documems and disburse the funds and documems called
for hereunder upon the Close of Escrow, provided each of the following conditions has then been
fulfilled:
(1) Title Company can issue in favor of Agency the Policy,
showing the Property vested in Agency subject only to the Permitted Title Exceptions.
Escrow Holder shall use the proceeds of the Purchase Price to obtain partial reconveyance, if
necessary, of any monetary liens encumbering the Property, so that the Property shall be free
and clear of monetary liens and encumbrances at the Close of Escrow.
(2) Escrow Holder shall have received Agency's notice of approval
or satisfaction or waiver of all of the contingencies to Agency 's obligations hereunder, as
provided for in Section 12.; and
(3)
Seller shall have deposited in Escrow the Grant Deed required
by Section 5.
b. Unless otherwise instructed in writing, Escrow Holder is authorized to record
at the Close of Escrow any instrument delivered through this Escrow if necessary or proper for
issuance of the Policy, including the Grant Deed.
s/3w99 ~t~A ~ Ag~,~t 2
7. Escrow. The parties hereby establish an escrow ("Escrow") to accommodate
the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. For purposes of this Agreement, Opening of
Escrow shall mean the date on which Escrow Holder shall have received a fully executed original of
this Agreement from Agency and Seller. Close of Escrow shall be the date upon which the Grant
Deed to Agency is delivered and recorded in the Official Records of the County of Riverside. The
Close of Escrow shall be on the date which is not later than the first business day occurring sixty
(60) days after the date of this Agreement. Before the Close of Escrow, all risk of loss and damage
to the Property from any source whatsoever shall be solely that of Seller.
8. Escrow Charges and Prorations. Agency shall pay for the cost of the CLTA
Owner's Standard Coverage Policy of Title Insurance, the Escrow fees and Escrow Holder's
customary out-of-pocket expenses for messenger services, long distance telephone, etc. Agency
shall pay for recording the Grant Deed and any documentary or other local transfer taxes, and any
other recording fees. If the Escrow shall fall to close through no fault of either party, Agency shall
pay all Escrow cancellation charges.
9. License to Enter. Seller hereby grants to Agency and Agency's authorized
agents, contractors, consultants, assigns, aUomeys, accountants and other representatives an
irrevocable license to enter upon the Property for the purpose of making inspections and other
examinations of the Property, including, but not limited to, the right to perform soil and geological
tests of the Property and an environmental site assessment thereof. Agency shall give Seller
reasonable notice before going on the Property. Agency does hereby indemnify and forever save
Seller, Seller's heirs, successors and assigns, and the Property, free and harmless from and against
any and all liability, loss, damages and costs and expenses, demands, causes of action, claims or
judgments, whether or not arising from or occurring out of any damage to the Property as a result of
any accident or other occurrence at the Property which is in any way connected with Agency's
inspections or non-permanent improvements involving entrance onto the Property pursuant to this
Section. If Agency fails to acquire the Property due to Agency's default, this license shall terminate
upon the termination of Agency's fight to purchase the Property. In such event, Agency shall
remove or cause to be removed all Agency's personal property, facilities, tools and equipment from
the Property.
10. Warranties and Representations of SeBer. Seller hereby represents and
warrants to Agency the following, it being expressly understood and agreed that all such
representations and warranties are to be true and correct as of the Close of Escrow and shall survive
the Close of Escrow:
a. That (i) on the Close of Escrow the Property shall be free and clear of
any and all hazardous or toxic substances, materials, and waste, including, but not limited to,
asbestos; (ii) the Property is in compliance with all applicable statutes and regulations, including
environmental, health and safety requirements; (iii) all businesses on the Property have disposed of
their waste in accordance with all applicable statutes, ordinances, and regulations; and (iv) Seller has
no notice of any pending or threatened action or proceeding arising out of the condition of the
Property or alleged violation of environmental, health or safety statutes, ordinance or regulations To
g/30199 RDA Pm'dm~ Agreeme~ 3
this end, it is agreed that notwithstanding the conveyance of the Property to Agency, Seller shall
indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless Agency from and against any and all claims,
liabilities, suits, losses, costs, expenses and damages, including but not limited to auorneys' fees and
costs, arising out of any claim for loss or damage to any property, including the Property, injuries to
or death of persons, or for the cost of cleaning up the Property and removing hazardous or toxic
substances, materials and waste therefrom, by reason of contamination or adverse effects on the
environment, or by mason of any statutes, ordinances, orders, rules or regulations of any
governmental entity or agency requiring the clean-up of the Property, caused by or resulting from
any hazardous material, substance or waste existing on, under or about the Property on the Close of
Escrow.
b. That Seller is the sole owner of the Property tYee and clear of all liens,
claims, encumbrances, easements, encroachments from adjacent properties, encroachments by
improvements or vegetation on the Property onto adjacent property, or rights of way of any nature,
other than those that may appear on the title commitment. Seller shall not further encumber the
Property or allow the Property or to be further encumbered prior to the Close of Escrow.
c. Neither this Agreement nor anything provided to be done hereunder
including the transfer of the Property to Agency, violates or shall violate any contract, agreement or
instrument to which Seller is a party, or which affects the Property, and the sale of the Property
herein contemplated does not require the consent of any party not a signatory hereto.
d. There are no mechanics', materialmen's or similar claims or liens
presently claimed or which will be claimed against the Property for work performed or commenced
prior to the date of this Agreement. Seller agrees to hold Agency harmless from all costs, expenses,
liabilities, losses, charges, fees, including attorney fees, arising from or relating to any such lien or
any similar lien claimed against the Property and arising from work performed or commenced prior
to the Close of Escrow.
e. There are no written or oral leases or contractual right or option to
lease, purchase, or otherwise enjoy possession, rights or interest of any nature in and to the Property
or any pan thereof, and no persons have any right of possession to the Property or any pan thereof.
f. Seller has no knowledge of any pending, threatened or potential
litigation, action or proceeding against Seller or any other Party before any court or administrative
tribunal which is in any way related to the Property.
11. FULL PAYMENT OF ALL OBLIGATIONS OF AGENCY. It is
understood and agreed between Seller and Agency that the payments made to Seller as set forth in
this Agreement represent an all inclusive settlement and is full and complete payment for just
compensation for the acquisition of all property interests pertaining to the Property and includes and
satisfies any and all other payments, if any, which may be required by law to be paid to Seller
arising out of the acquisition and displacement of the Seller and persons residing on the Property,
and specifically includes, but is not limited to, claims for severance and other damages, attorney's
~/~o/~ ~A ~ A~m 4
fees, interest, expenses of litigation, expert's fees, precondemnation damages, inverse
condemnation, owner participation rights under the Redevelopmere Plan, relocation assistance
and/or benefits under the Unitbrm Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act
of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4601, et seq.), if applicable, or under Title 1, Division 7, Chapter 1 of the
Government Code of the State of California (Section 7260, et seq.), and loss of business goodwill
under the Eminent Domain Law, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.510, and all costs and
expenses whatever in connection therewith. Seller hereby acknowledges that Agency has advised
Seller of the possible availability of such relocation assistance rights to Seller and that the waiver of
all rights by Seller herein set forth are free and voluntary.
12. Agency 's Contingencies. a. For the benefit of Agency, the Closing of Escrow
and the Agency's obligation to consummate the purchase of the Property shall be contingent upon
and subject to the occurrence of all of the following (or Agency's written waiver thereof, it being
agreed that Agency can waive any or all such contingencies) on or before the Close of Escrow:
(1) That as of the Close of Escrow the representations and
warranties of Seller contained in this Agreement are all true and correct.
(2) The delivery of all documents pursuant to Section 5. hereof.
(3) Title Company's commitment to issue in favor of Agency of a
CLTA Standard Coverage Owner' s Policy of Title Insurance with liability equal to the
Purchase Price showing Agency's fee interest in the Property subject only to the Permitted
Title Exceptions.
(4) Agency's approval prior to the Close of Escrow of any
environmental site assessment, soils or geological reports, or other physical inspections of the
Property or the underlying real property that Agency might perform prior to the Close of
Escrow.
(5) Close of Escrow occur on the date which is not later than the
first business day occurring sixty (60) days after the date of this Agreement.
b. In the event one or more of the contingencies occurs, the Agency shall be
entitled to terminate this Agreement without being in breach or default under the Agreement, in
accordance with the procedures set/brth in Section 14 of this Agreement. Seller further agrees that
in the event of the occurrence of any such contingencies and termination of this Agreement by
Agency, it will suffer no damages resulting from the termination or Agency's enactment of the
Resolution and that Agency shall have no liability to Seller whatsoever for such actions, except for
payment of its share of escrow cancellation fees.
13. Certification of Non-Foreign Status. Seller covenants to deliver to Escrow a
certification of Non-Foreign Status in accordance with I.R.C. Section 1445, and a similar notice
8/30/99 RDA Purchase Agreeag-m 5
pursuant to California Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 18805 and 26131, prior to the Close of
Escrow.
14. Default. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreemere, in the event of a
breach or default under this Agreement by either Agency or Seller, the non-defaulting party shall
have, in addition to all rights available at law or equity, the right to terminate this Agreement and
the Escrow for the purchase and sale of the Property, by delivering written notice thereof to the
delhulting party and to Escrow Holder, and if Agency is the non-defaulting party, Agency shall
thereupon promptly receive a refund of all prior deposits, if any. Such termination of the Escrow by
a non-defaulting party shall be without prejudice to the non-defaulting party's rights and remedies at
law or equity.
15. Notices. All notices and demands shall be given in writing by certified mail,
postage prepaid, and return receipt requested, or by personal delivery. Notices shall be considered
given upon the earlier of (a) personal delivery, (b) two (2) business days following deposit in the
United States mail, postage prepaid, certified or registered, return receipt requested, or (c) one (1)
business day following deposit with an overnight carrier service. A copy of all notices shall be sent
to Escrow Holder. Notices shall be addressed as provided below for the respective party; provided
that if any party gives notice in writing of a change of name or address, notices to such party shall
thereafter be given as demanded in that notice:
Agency:
Redevelopmere Agency of the City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Atm: Executive Director
COPY TO:
Richards, Watson & Gershon
333 So. Hope St., 38th FIr.
Los Angeles, California 90071
Attn: Peter M. Thorson, Esq.
SELLER:
Irene Landanyi
1220 Hillcrest Lane
Fallbrook, CA 92028
ESCROW
HOLDER
First American Title Company
3625 Fourteenth Street
Riverside, CA 92502
Atm: Deborah Newton
Escrow No.
16. Broker's Commissions. Seller shall pay all claims of brokers,
agents or finders, licensed or unlicensed, and all claims of real estate or other consultants which
exist or may arise as a result of Seller' s actions with respect to the Property. Agency shall not be
8130199 RDA Purchase Agreement - 6 -
liable for any such fees or claims and Seller shall indemnify Agency, its officers, employees and
agents, from any and all costs, liabilities or judgments, including attorneys' fees, incurred in
defending or paying any such claims.
17. Further Instructions. Each party agrees to execute such other and further
escrow instructions as may be necessary or proper in order to consummate the transaction
contemplated by this Agreement.
18. Amendments. Any amendments to this Agreement shall be effective only
when duly executed by Agency and Seller and deposited with Escrow Holder.
19. Miscellaneous.
a. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted
under, and govemed and enforced according to the laws of the State of Caiifomia.
b. Entire Agreement. This Agreement supersedes any prior agreement,
oral or written, and together with the Exhibits hereto and any agreements delivered pursuant hereto,
contains the entire agreement between Agency and Seller on the subject matter hereof. No
subsequent agreement, representation or promise made by either party hereto, or by or to any
employee, officer, agent or representative of either party, shall be of any effect unless it is in writing
and executed by the party to be bound thereby. No person is authorized to make, and by execution
hereof Seller and Agency acknowledge that no person has made, any representation, warranty,
guaranty or promise except as set forth herein; and no agreement, statement, representation or
promise made by any such person which is not contained herein shall be valid or binding on Seller
or Agency.
c. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and
inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties
hereto.
d. Time of Essence. The parties acknowledge that time is of the essence
in this Agreement, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Escrow company 's general
Escrow instructions.
8/30/99 RDA Purchase Agreemen~ 7
e. Remedies Not Exclusive and Waivers. No remedy conferred by any
of the specific provisions of this Agreement is intended to be exclusive of any other remedy and each
and every remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given
hereunder or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute or otherwise. The election of
any one or more remedies shall not constitute a waiver of the right to pursue other available
remedies.
f. Interpretation and Construction. The parties agree that each party
has reviewed and revised this Agreement and have had the opportunity to have their counsel and real
estate advisors review and revise this agreement and that any rule of construction to the effect that
ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not apply in the interpretation of this
Agreement or any amendments or exhibits thereto. In this Agreement the neuter gender includes the
feminine and masculine, and singular number includes the plural, and the words "person" and
"party" include corporation, parmership, firm, trust, or association wherever the context so requires.
The captions of the sections and subsections of this Agreement are for convenience and reference
only, and the words contained therein shall in no way be held to explain, modify, amplify or aid in
the interpretation, construction or meaning of the provisions of this Agreement.
g. Seller Cousultatious. Seller has reviewed the terms of the sale
of its property to the Agency and the effects of such sale with its legal counsel, tax consultant, and
real estate advisor. Seller warrants and represents to the Agency that except for the terms of this
Agreement and the recitals set forth herein, Seller has not relied on any statements, opinions, or
other comments of the Agency, its officers, employees, attorneys, consultants or agents and has
independently reviewed and verified such facts, tax consequences, and other matters as may be
important to Seller in connection with this transaction. Seller acknowledges and agrees that in the
event such matters turn out differently than Seller anticipates at this time, Seller shall assume all
responsibility and liability for such matters and shall have no recourse against the Agency for such
changes.
h. Executive Director's Authority. The Executive Director is hereby
directed and authorized to execute such other documents, including without limitation, escrow
instructions and amendments thereto, certificates of acceptance, agreements for payments of lost
rent, or certifications, as may be necessary or convenient to implement the terms of this Agreement.
20. Attorneys' Fees. If either party hereto incurs attorneys' fees in order to
enforce, defend or interpret any of the terms, provisions or conditions of this Agreement or because
of a breach of this Agreement by the other party, the prevailing party, whether by suit, negotiation,
arbitration or settlement shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees from the other party.
21. Assignment. Agency may assign its rights under this Agreement or may
designate a nominee to acquire title to the Property, provided, however, that any such assignment or
designation shall not relieve Agency of any of its obligations under this Agreement.
8/30199 RDA Purclutse Agreemeta - 8 -
22. Escrow Holder Need Not Be Concerned. Escrow Holder is not to be
concerned with Section 9, 10, 11 and 16 hereof, and Agency and Seller release Escrow Holder from
liability or obligation as to Section 9, 10, 11 and 16 hereof.
IN WITNESS WItEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the
day and year first written above.
SELLER
Irene Ladanyi
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, a public body, corporate and politic:
Karel Lindemans
Chairperson
ATTEST:
Susan Jones, Agency Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By
Peter M. Thorson
Agency Attorney
8130/99 RDA Purchase Agreement - 9 -
EXHIBIT "A"
Legal Description of the Property
Lot 4/and the Northwesterly 8 feet of the Northeasterly 105 feet of Lot 3 in Block 34 of the TOWN
OF TEMECULA, as shown by Map on file in Book 15 page 726 of Maps, Records of San Diego
County, California, together with that portion of an unnamed street 40 feet in width as shown on
said map adjacent said Lot 4 on the Southwest, as vacated by Order of the Board of Supervisors of
Riverside County, a copy of which was recorded December 8, 1936 in Book 304, page 356 of
Official Records.
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVEL-
OPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT
CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITI,ED "PURCHASE AND SAI,F, AGREE-
MENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS" FOR ACQUISITION OF
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 28496 PUJOL STREET IN
THE CITY OF TEMECULA
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THF, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula
hereby finds, determines and declares that:
a. The Agency is currently implementing the Redevelopment Plan for
Redevelopment Project No. 1--1988, originally approved by the Board of Supervisors of
Riverside County on July 12, 1988 prior to incorporation of the City of Temecula and
subsequently approved and transferred to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Temecula on April 9, 1991 (the "Plan").
b. The Agency proposes to purchase the property described in the "Purchase
and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions" attached hereto as Exhibit A. and located
at 28496 Pujol Street in the City of Temecula (APN 922-053-005) for redevelopment
purposes consistent with the Agency authority under the Plan and the Community
Redevelopment Act, Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.
c. The Agreement is consistent with the Plan and with the Implementation
Plan adopted by the Agency.
d. The Agency Board has duly considered all terms and conditions of the
proposed Agreement and believes that such agreement is in the best interests of the Agency
and City and the health, safety, and welfare of its residents, and in accord with the public
purposes and provisions of applicable State and local law requirements.
e. This action is being undertaken pursuant to the Plan for which a full and
complete Environmental Impact Report was prepared and certified prior to adoption of the
Plan. Moreover the acquisition of property by itself will have no impact on the
environment as it is simply the change in ownership of the property without a change in
the physical condition of the property. None of the conditions described in 14 Cal.
Admin. Code § 15162 are found to exist. Therefore, pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
R:\powersj\acquisitionsreso. Viefhaus
and, specifically, 14 Cal. Admin. Code §§ 15162 and 15180, neither a subsequent nor a
supplemental Environmental Impact Report is required for the subject agreement.
Section 2. The Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula
hereby approves that certain "Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions" between the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, a public body corporate and politic, and Robert
M. Viefhaus and Richard C. Barker, which Purchase Agreemere is dated as of September 14,
1999. The Chairperson of the Agency is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Agreemere
on behalf of the Agency.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED by the Board of Directors of the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula on September 14, 1999.
Karel F. Lindemans, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
Acting Agency Secretary/City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:\powersj\acquisitionsreso.Viefhaus
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
SS
I, Susan W. Jones, Acting Secretary of the Redevelopmere Agency, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. RDA 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Temecula Redevelopmere Agency at a regular meeting thereof held on the
14 th day of September , 1999, by the following vote:
AYES:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
NOES:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
ABSENT:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
Acting Agency Secretary/City Clerk
R:\powersj\acquisitionsreso. Viefhaus
EXHIBIT "A"
OF
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PURCHASE AND SAI,E AGREEMENT
AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS
THIS PURCHASE AND SAI,F, AGREEMENT AND ESCROW
INSTRUCTIONS ("Agreement") is dated and entered into as of September 14, 1999 by and
between Robert M. Viefhaus and Richard C. Barker ("Seller"), and the REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, a public body, corporate and politic ("Agency"), and
constitutes both an agreement to purchase and sell real property between the parties and the parties'
escrow instructions directed to First American Title Insurance Company ("Escrow Holder"). In
consideration of the premises operative provisions and the recitals set forth in this Agreement, the
parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Recitals. The paxties hereto represent to each other that the following
facts and purposes are true and correct:
a. On May 20, 1999 the Agency delivered Seller an offer (the "Offer") to
purchase the real property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a pan hereof (the
"Property").
b. Following delivery of the Offer Agency and Seller negotiated terms by
which the Agency would acquire the Property so as to avoid eminent domain proceedings and now
desire to set forth in this Agreement the terms and conditions of the Agency's acquisition of the
Property..
c. Agency intends to use the Property for public purposes allowed by law,
including, but not limited to, subsequent conveyance of the Property to other govemmental entities
for public purposes.
2. Purchase and Sale. On the Close of Escrow (as herein defined), Seller agrees
to sell the Property to Agency, and Agency agrees to buy the Property from Seller, on the terms and
conditions hereinafter set forth.
3. Purchase Price/Relocation Benefits. The purchase price for the Property to
be paid by Agency is the sum of one hundred thirty-two thousand five hundred dollars
($132,500.00) (the "Purchase Price"), which sum shall be paid in full in cash on the Close of
Escrow together with Agency's share of the closing costs. Agency shall pay to Owner on the Close
of Escrow the sum of twenty-two thousand five hundred dollars ($22,500.00) for relocation
assistance and benefits pursuant to Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition
Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4601, et seq.), if applicable, or under Title 1, Division 7, Chapter
1 of the Government Code of the State of Califomia (Section 7260, et seq.).]
4. Title and Title Insurance. Upon the Opening of Escrow, Escrow Holder
shall order from First American Title Company ("Title Company") a title commitment for the
8/30/99 RDA Pm'clmse Agrm~nt
Property. Escrow Holder shall also request two copies each of all instruments idemi~ed as
exceptions on said title commitmere. Upon receipt of the foregoing, Escrow Holder shall deliver
these instruments and the title commitment to Agency and Seller. Agency 's fee title to the Property
shall be insured at the Close of Escrow by a CLTA Owner's Standard Coverage Policy of Ti~e
Insurance in the amoum of the Purchase Price (the "Policy"). The Policy of title insurance provided
for pursuant to this Section shall insure Agency's fee interest in the Property free and clear of all
liens, encumbrances, restrictions, and rights-of-way of record, subject only to the following
permitted conditions of title ("Permitted Title Exceptions"):
a. The applicable zoning, building and development regulations of any
municipality, county, state or federal jurisdiction affecting the Property; and
b. Those non-monetary exceptions approved by Agency within fifteen
(15) business days after the date Agency receives the title commitmere and legible copies of all
instruments noted as exceptions therein. If Agency unconditionally disapproves any such excep-
tions, Escrow shall thereupon terminate, all funds deposited therein shall be refunded to Agency
(less Agency' s share of escrow cancellation charges), and this Agreement shall be of no further force
or effect. If Agency conditionally disapproves any such exceptions, then Seller shall use Seller's
best efforts to cause such exceptions to be removed by the Close of Escrow. If such conditionally
disapproved non-monetary exceptions are not removed by the Close of Escrow, Agency may, at
Agency's option, either accept the Property subject to such encumbrances, or terminate the Escrow
and receive a refund of all funds deposited into Escrow (less Agency's share of escrow cancellation
charges), if any, and this Agreemere shall thereupon be of no further force or effect. At the Close
of Escrow, Agency's fee title to the Property shall be free and clear of all monetary encumbrances.
5. Graut Deed. Seller covenants and agrees to deposit with Escrow Holder prior
to the Close of Escrow a Grant Deed duly executed and acknowledged by Seller, granting and
conveying to Agency the Property. The Grant Deed shall be in a form satisfactory to Agency and
Agency's counsel and shall be accepted by Agency prior to recording.
6. Authorization to Record Documents and Disburse Funds. a. Escrow
Holder is hereby authorized to record the documems and disburse the funds and documems called
for hereunder upon the Close of Escrow, provided each of the following conditions has then been
fulfilled:
(1) Title Company can issue in favor of Agency the Policy,
showing the Property vested in Agency subject only to the Permitted Title Exceptions.
Escrow Holder shall use the proceeds of the Purchase Price to obtain partial reconveyance, if
necessary, of any monetary liens encumbering the Property, so that the Property shall be free
and clear of monetary liens and encumbrances at the Close of Escrow.
(2) Escrow Holder shall have received Agency's notice of approval
or satisfaction or waiver of all of the comingencies to Agency 's obligations hereunder, as
provided for in Section 12.; and
(3)
Seller shall have deposited in Escrow the Grant Deed required
by Section 5.
8/30/99 RDA Purchase Agreemere 2
b. Unless otherwise instructed in writing, Escrow Holder is authorized to record
at the Close of Escrow any instrument delivered through this Escrow if necessary or proper for
issuance of the Policy, including the Grant Deed.
7. Escrow. The parties hereby establish an escrow ("Escrow") to accommodate
the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. For purposes of this Agreement, Opening of
Escrow shall mean the date on which Escrow Holder shall have received a fully executed original of
this Agreement from Agency and Seller. Close of Escrow shall be the date upon which the Grant
Dccd to Agency is delivered and recorded in the Official Records of the County of Riverside. The
Close of Escrow shall be on the date which is not later than the first business day occurring sixty
(60) days after the date of this Agreement. Before the Close of Escrow, all risk of loss and damage
to the Property from any source whatsoever shall be solely that of Seller.
8. Escrow Charges and Prorations. Agency shall pay for the cost of the CLTA
Owner's Standard Coverage Policy of Title Insurance, the Escrow fees and Escrow Holder's
customary out-of-pocket expenses for messenger services, long distance telephone, etc. Agency
shall pay for recording the Grant Deed and any documentary or other local transfer taxes, and any
other recording fees. If the Escrow shall fall to close through no fault of either party, Agency shall
pay all Escrow cancellation charges.
9. License to Enter. Seller hereby grants to Agency and Agency's authorized
agents, contractors, consultants, assigns, attorneys, accountants and other representatives an
irrevocable license to enter upon the Property for the purpose of making inspections and other
examinations of the Property, including, but not limited to, the right to perform soil and geological
tests of the Properly and an environmental site assessment thereof. Agency shall give Seller
reasonable notice before going on the Property. Agency does hereby indemnify and forever save
Seller, Seller's heirs, successors and assigns, and the Property, free and harmless from and against
any and all liability, loss, damages and costs and expenses, demands, causes of action, claims or
judgments, whether or not arising from or occurring out of any damage to the Property as a result of
any accident or other occurrence at the Property which is in any way connected with Agency's
inspections or non-permanent improvements involving entrance onto the Property pursuant to this
Section. If Agency falls to acquire the Property due to Agency's default, this license shall terminate
upon the termination of Agency's right to purchase the Property. In such event, Agency shall
remove or cause to be removed all Agency's personal property, facilities, tools and equipment from
the Property.
10. Warranties and Representations of Seller. Seller hereby represents and
warrants to Agency the following, it being expressly understood and agreed that all such
representations and warranties are to be true and correct as of the Close of Escrow and shall survive
the Close of Escrow:
a. That (i) on the Close of Escrow the Property shall be free and clear of
any and all hazardous or toxic substances, materials, and waste, including, but not limited to,
asbestos; (ii) the Property is in compliance with all applicable statutes and regulations, including
8130199 RDA hrdlme Ageemeat 3
environmental, health and safety requirements; (iii) all businesses on the Property have disposed of
their waste in accordance with all applicable statutes, ordinances, and regulations; and (iv) Seller has
no notice of any pending or threatened action or proceeding arising out of the condition of the
Property or alleged violation of environmental, health or safety statutes, ordinance or regulations To
this end, it is agreed that notwithstanding the conveyance of the Property to Agency, Seller shall
indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless Agency from and against any and all claims,
liabilities, suits, losses, costs, expenses and damages, including but not limited to auomeys' fees and
costs, arising out of any claim for loss or damage to any property, including the Property, injuries to
or death of persons, or for the cost of cleaning up the Property and removing hazardous or toxic
substances, materials and waste therefrom, by reason of contamination or adverse effects on the
environment, or by reason of any statutes, ordinances, orders, rules or regulations of any
governmental entity or agency requiring the clean-up of the Property, caused by or resulting from
any hazardous material, substance or waste existing on, under or about the Property on the Close of
Escrow.
b. That Seller is the sole owner of the Property free and clear of all liens,
claims, encumbrances, easements, encroachments from adjacent properties, encroachments by
improvements or vegetation on the Property onto adjacent property, or rights of way of any nature,
other than those that may appear on the title commitment. Seller shall not further encumber the
Property or allow the Property or to be funher encumbered prior to the Close of Escrow.
c. Neither this Agreement nor anything provided to be done hereunder
including the transfer of the Property to Agency, violates or shall violate any contract, agreement or
instrument to which Seller is a party, or which affects the Property, and the sale of the Property
herein contemplated does not require the consent of any party not a signatory hereto.
d. There are no mechanics', materialmeWs or similar claims or liens
presently claimed or which will be claimed against the Property for work performed or commenced
prior to the date of this Agreement. Seller agrees to hold Agency harmless from all costs, expenses,
liabilities, losses, charges, fees, including attorney fees, arising from or relating to any such lien or
any similar lien claimed against the Property and arising from work performed or commenced prior
to the Close of Escrow.
e. There are no written or oral leases or contractual right or option to
lease, purchase, or otherwise enjoy possession, rights or interest of any nature in and to the Property
or any pan thereof, and no persons have any right of possession to the Property or any pan thereof.
f. Seller has no knowledge of any pending, threatened or potential
litigation, action or proceeding against Seller or any other Party before any court or administrative
tribunal which is in any way related to the Property.
11. FULL PAYMENT OF ALL OBLIGATIONS OF AGENCY. It is
understood and agreed between Seller and Agency that the payments made to Seller as set forth in
this Agreement represent an all inclusive settlement and is full and complete payment for just
8/30/99 RDA Purdmse Agreemere - 4 -
compensation for the acquisition of all property interests pertaining to the Property and includes and
satisfies any and all other payments, if any, which may be required by law to be paid to Seller
arising out of the acquisition and displacement of the Seller and persons residing on the Property,
and specifically includes, but is not limited to, claims for severance and other damages, attorney' s
fees, interest, expenses of litigation, expert' s fees, precondemnation damages, inverse
condemnation, owner participation rights under the Redevelopment Plan, relocation assistance
and/or benefits under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act
of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4601, et seq.), if applicable, or under Title 1, Division 7, Chapter 1 of the
Government Code of the State of California (Section 7260, et seq. ), and loss of business goodwill
under the Eminent Domain Law, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.510, and all costs and
expenses whatever in connection therewith. Seller hereby acknowledges that Agency has advised
Seller of the possible availability of such relocation assistance rights to Seller and that the waiver of
all rights by Seller herein set forth are free and voluntary.
12. Agency 's Contingencies. a. For the benefit of Agency, the Closing of Escrow
and the Agency's obligation to consummate the purchase of the Property shall be contingent upon
and subject to the occurrence of all of the following (or Agency' s written waiver thereof, it being
agreed that Agency can waive any or all such contingencies) on or before the Close of Escrow:
(1) That as of the Close of Escrow the representations and
warranties of Seller contained in this Agreement are all true and correct.
(2) The delivery of all documents pursuant to Section 5. hereof.
(3) Title Company's commitment to issue in favor of Agency of a
CLTA Standard Coverage Owner' s Policy of Title Insurance with liability equal to the
Purchase Price showing Agency's fee interest in the Property subject only to the Permitted
Title Exceptions.
(4) Agency's approval prior to the Close of Escrow of any
environmental site assessment, soils or geological reports, or other physical inspections of the
Property or the underlying real property that Agency might perform prior to the Close of
Escrow.
(5) Close of Escrow occur on the date which is not later than the
first business day occurring sixty (60) days after the date of this Agreement.
b. In the event one or more of the contingencies occurs, the Agency shall he
entitled to terminate this Agreement without being in breach or default under the Agreement, in
accordance with the procedures set l~rth in Section 14 of this Agreement. Seller further agrees that
in the event of the occurrence of any such contingencies and termination of this Agreement by
Agency, it will suffer no damages resulting from the termination or Agency's enactment of the
Resolution and that Agency shall have no liability to Seller whatsoever for such actions, except for
payment of its share of escrow cancellation fees.
8/30/99 RDA ~ Agreemorn 5
13. Certification of Non-Foreign Status. Seller covenants to deliver to Escrow a
certification of Non-Foreign Status in accordance with I.R.C. Section 1445, and a similar notice
pursuant to California Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 18805 and 26131, prior to the Close of
Escrow.
14. Default. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreemere, in the evem of a
breach or default under this Agreemere by either Agency or Seller, the non-defaulting party shall
have, in addition to all rights available at law or equity, the right to terminate this Agreement and
the Escrow for the purchase and sale of the Property, by delivering written notice thereof to the
defaulting party and to Escrow Holder, and if Agency is the non-defaulting party, Agency shall
thereupon promptly receive a refund of all prior deposits, if any. Such termination of the Escrow by
a non-defaulting party shall be without prejudice to the non-defaulting pany's rights and remedies at
law or equity.
15. Notices. All notices and demands shall be given in writing by certified mall,
postage prepaid, and return receipt requested, or by personal delivery. Notices shall be considered
given upon the earlier of (a) personal delivery, (b) two (2) business days following deposit in the
United States mall, postage prepaid, certified or registered, return receipt requested, or (c) one (1)
business day following deposit with an overnight carrier service. A copy of all notices shall be sere
to Escrow Holder. Notices shall be addressed as provided below for the respective party; provided
that if any party gives notice in writing of a change of name or address, notices to such party shall
thereafter be given as demanded in that notice:
Agency:
Redevelopmere Agency of the City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attn: Executive Director
COPY TO:
Richards, Watson & Gershon
333 So. Hope St., 38th FIr.
Los Angeles, California 90071
Attn: Peter M. Thorson, Esq.
SELLER:
Robert M. Viefhaus
Richard C. Barker
7777 Center Ave., Suite 470
Huntington Beach, CA 92647-3059
ESCROW
HOLDER
First American Title Company
3625 Fourteenth Street
Riverside, CA 92502
Atm: Deborah Newton
Escrow No.
16. Broker's Commissions. Seller shall pay all claims of brokers,
agents or finders, licensed or unlicensed, and all claims of real estate or other consultants which
exist or may arise as a result of Seller's actions with respect to the Property. Agency shall not be
liable for any such fees or claims and Seller shall indemnify Agency, its officers, employees and
agents, from any and all costs, liabilities or judgments, including attorneys' fees, incurred in
defending or paying any such claims.
17. Further In~ructions. Each party agrees to execute such other and further
escrow instructions as may be necessary or proper in order to consummate the transaction
contemplated by this Agreement.
18. Amendments. Any amendments to this Agreement shall be effective only
when duly executed by Agency and Seller and deposited with Escrow Holder.
19. Miscellaneous.
a. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted
under, and governed and enforced according to the laws of the State of Califomia.
b. Entire Agreement. This Agreement supersedes any prior agreement,
oral or written, and together with the Exhibits hereto and any agreements delivered pursuant hereto,
contains the entire agreement between Agency and Seller on the subject matter hereof. No
subsequent agreement, representation or promise made by either party hereto, or by or to any
employee, officer, agent or representative of either party, shall be of any effect unless it is in writing
and executed by the party to be bound thereby. No person is authorized to make, and by execution
hereof Seller and Agency acknowledge that no person has made, any representation, warranty,
guaranty or promise except as set forth herein; and no agreement, statement, representation or
promise made by any such person which is not contained herein shall be valid or binding on Seller
or Agency.
c. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and
inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties
hereto.
d. Time of Essence. The paxties acknowledge that time is of the essence
in this Agreement, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Escrow company's general
Escrow instructions.
e. Remedies Not Exclusive and Waivers. No remedy conferred by any
of the specific provisions of this Agreement is intended to be exclusive of any other remedy and each
and every remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given
hereunder or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute or otherwise. The election of
8130199 RDA Purchase Agreemeat - 7 -
any one or more remedies shall not constitute a waiver of the right to pursue other available
remedies.
f. Interpretation and Construction. The parties agree that each party
has reviewed and revised this Agreement and have had the opportunity to have their counsel and real
estate advisors review and revise this agreement and that any rule of construction to the effect that
ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not apply in the interpretation of this
Agreement or any amendments or exhibits thereto. In this Agreement the neuter gender includes the
feminine and masculine, and singular number includes the plural, and the words "person" and
"party" include corporation, partnership, firm, trust, or association wherever the context so requires.
The captions of the sections and subsections of this Agreement are for convenience and reference
only, and the words contained therein shall in no way be held to explain, modify, amplify or aid in
the interpretation, construction or meaning of the provisions of this Agreement.
g. Seller Consultations. Seller has reviewed the terms of the sale
of its property to the Agency and the effects of such sale with its legal counsel, tax consultant, and
real estate advisor. Seller warrants and represents to the Agency that except tbr the terms of this
Agreement and the recitals set forth herein, Seller has not relied on any statements, opinions, or
other comments of the Agency, its officers, employees, attorneys, consultants or agents and has
independently reviewed and verified such facts, tax consequences, and other matters as may be
important to Seller in connection with this transaction. Seller acknowledges and agrees that in the
event such matters turn out differently than Seller anticipates at this time, Seller shall assume all
responsibility and liability for such matters and shall have no recourse against the Agency for such
changes.
h. Executive Director's Authority. The Executive Director is hereby
directed and authorized to execute such other documents, including without limitation, escrow
instructions and amendments thereto, certificates of acceptance, agreements for payments of lost
rent, or certifications, as may be necessary or convenient to implement the terms of this Agreement.
20. Attorneys' Fees. If either party hereto incurs attorneys' fees in order to
enforce, defend or interpret any of the terms, provisions or conditions of this Agreement or because
of a breach of this Agreement by the other party, the prevailing party, whether by suit, negotiation,
arbitration or settlement shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees from the other party.
21. Assi_~-nment. Agency may assign its rights under this Agreement or may
designate a nominee to acquire title to the Property, provided, however, that any such assignment or
designation shall not relieve Agency of any of its obligations under this Agreement.
22. Escrow Holder Need Not Be Concerned. Escrow Holder is not to be
concerned with Section 9, 10, 11 and 16 hereof, and Agency and Seller release Escrow Holder from
liability or obligation as to Section 9, 10, 11 and 16 hereof.
/////
8130199 RDA Purchase Agn~cment - 8 -
22. Escrow Holder Need Not Be Concerned. Escrow Holder is not to be
concerned with Section 9, 10, 11 and 16 hereof, and Agency and Seller release Escrow Holder from
liability or obligation as to Section 9, 10, 11 and 16 hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the
day and year first written above.
SELLER
Robert M. Viefhaus
Richard C.B~ker
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THF. CITY OF
TEMECULA, a public body, corporate and politic:
Karel Lindemans
Chairperson
ATTEST:
By
Susan Jones, Agency Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By
Peter M. Thorson
Agency Attorney
8130199 RDA Parchas~ Agreemen 9
Legal Description of the Property
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THE NORTHWESTERLY 170 FEET OF THE NORTHWESTERLY HALF OF THAT TRACT OF
LAND FORMERLY USED AS A RAILROAD RIGHT(S) OF WAY AND STATION GROUNDS
OF THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY, CONVEYED TO
N.R. VAIL, ET AL, BY DEED RECORDED JUNE 11, 1940 IN BOOK 464 PAGE 505 OF
OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, SAID PROPERTY BEING
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT(S) 1 IN BLOCK 27 AS SHOWN
BY MAP OF TEMECULA ON FILE IN BOOK 15 PAGE(S) 726, OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN
DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE, TO
THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 2 IN BLOCK 36 AS SHOWN BY SAID MAP;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE, TO THE MOST NORTHERLY
CORNER OF LOT 10 IN BLOCK 37 AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP; THENCE
NORTHEASTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 22
IN BLOCK 25 AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY IN A STRAIGHT
LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
EXCEPT THE NORTHWESTERLY 70 FEET,
ALSO EXCEPT THE NORTHEASTERLY 125 FEET AS MEASURED FROM THE
SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF RIVER STREET.
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVEL-
OPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT
CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITI,ED "PURCHASE AND SAI,F, AGREE-
MENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS" FOR ACQUISITION OF
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 28516 PUJOL STREET IN
THF~ CITY OF TEMECULA
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TIlE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula
hereby finds, determines and declares that:
a. The Agency is currently implementing the Redevelopment Plan for
Redevelopment Project No. 1--1988, originally approved by the Board of Supervisors of
Riverside County on July 12, 1988 prior to incorporation of the City of Temecula and
subsequently approved and transferred to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Temecula on April 9, 1991 (the "Plan").
b. The Agency proposes to purchase the property described in the "Purchase
and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions" attached hereto as Exhibit A. and located
at 28516 Pujol Street in the City of Temecula (APN 922-053-007) for redevelopment
purposes consistent with the Agency authority under the Plan and the Community
Redevelopment Act, Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.
c. The Agreement is consistent with the Plan and with the Implementation
Plan adopted by the Agency.
d. The Agency Board has duly considered all terms and conditions of the
proposed Agreement and believes that such agreement is in the best interests of the Agency
and City and the health, safety, and welfare of its residents, and in accord with the public
purposes and provisions of applicable State and local law requirements.
e. This action is being undertaken pursuant to the Plan for which a full and
complete Environmental Impact Report was prepared and certified prior to adoption of the
Plan. Moreover the acquisition of property by itself will have no impact on the
environment as it is simply the change in ownership of the property without a change in
the physical condition of the property. None of the conditions described in 14 Cal.
Admin. Code § 15162 are found to exist. Therefore, pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
R:\powersj\acquisitions\Irwin.reso
and, specifically, 14 Cal. Admin. Code §§ 15162 and 15180, neither a subsequem nor a
supplemental Environmental Impact Report is required for the subject agreement.
Section 2. The Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula
hereby approves that certain "Purchase and Sale Agreemere and Escrow Instructions" between the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, a public body corporate and politic, and Irene
Landanyi, which Purchase Agreement is dated as of September 14, 1999. The Chairperson of
the Agency is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Agreemere on behalf of the Agency.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the
Redevelopmere Agency of the City of Temecula on September 14, 1999.
Karel F. Lindemans, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
Acting Agency Secretary/City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:\powersj\acquisitions\Irwin.reso
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
SS
I, Susan W. Jones, Acting Secretary of the Redevelopmere Agency, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. RDA 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Temecula Redevelopmerit Agency at a regular meeting thereof held on the
14 th day of September , 1999, by the following vote:
AYES:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
NOES:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
ABSENT:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
Acting Agency Secretary/City Clerk
R:\powersj\acquisitions\Irwin.reso
EXHIBIT "A"
OF
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT
AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS
THIS PURCHASE AND SALF. AGREEMENT AND ESCROW
INSTRUCTIONS ("Agreement") is dated and entered into as of September 14, 1999 by and
between Leslie Irwin ("Seller"), and the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, a public body, corporate and politic ("Agency"), and constitutes both an agreement to
purchase and sell real property between the parties and the parties' escrow instructions directed to
First American Title Insurance Company ("Escrow Holder"). In consideration of the premises
operative provisions and the recitals set forth in this Agreement, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Recitals. The paxties hereto represent to each other that the following
facts and purposes are true and correct:
a. On May 20, 1999 the Agency delivered Seller an offer (the "Offer") to
purchase the real property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a pan hereof (the
"Property").
b. Following delivery of the Offer Agency and Seller negotiated terms by
which the Agency would acquire the Property so as to avoid eminent domain proceedings and now
desire to set forth in this Agreement the terms and conditions of the Agency 's acquisition of the
Property..
c. Agency intends to use the Property for public purposes allowed by law,
including, but not limited to, subsequent conveyance of the Property to other governmental entities
for public purposes.
2. Purchase and Sale. On the Close of Escrow (as heroin defined), Seller agrees
to sell the Property to Agency, and Agency agrees to buy the Property from Seller, on the terms and
conditions hereinafter set forth.
3. Purchase Price/Relocation Benefits. The purchase price for the Property to
be paid by Agency is the sum of one hundred forty thousand dollars ($140,000.00) (the "Purchase
Price"), which sum shall be paid in full in cash on the Close of Escrow together with Agency's share
of the closing costs. Agency shall pay to Owner on the Close of Escrow the sum of twenty-two
thousand five hundred dollars ($22,500.00) for relocation assistance and benefits pursuant to
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C.
4601, et seq.), if applicable, or under Title 1, Division 7, Chapter 1 of the Government Code of the
State of California (Section 7260, et seq.).]
4. Title and Title Insurance. Upon the Opening of Escrow, Escrow Holder
shall order from First American Title Company ("Title Company") a title commitment for the
Property. Escrow Holder shall also request two copies each of all instruments identified as
8/30/99 RDA Purchase Agreement
exceptions on said title commitment. Upon receipt of the foregoing, Escrow Holder shall deliver
these instruments and the title commitment to Agency and Seller. Agency's fee title to the Property
shall be insured at the Close of Escrow by a CLTA Owner's Standard Coverage Policy of Title
Insurance in the amount of the Purchase Price (the "Policy"). The Policy of title insurance provided
for pursuant to this Section shall insure Agency's fee interest in the Property free and clear of all
liens, encumbrances, restrictions, and rights-of-way of record, subject only to the following
permitted conditions of title ("Permitted Title Exceptions"):
a. The applicable zoning, building and development regulations of any
municipality, county, state or federal jurisdiction affecting the Property; and
b. Those non-monetary exceptions approved by Agency within fifteen
(15) business days after the date Agency receives the title commitment and legible copies of all
instruments noted as exceptions therein. If Agency unconditionally disapproves any such excep-
tions, Escrow shall thereupon terminate, all funds deposited therein shall be refunded to Agency
(less Agency's share of escrow cancellation charges), and this Agreement shall be of no further force
or effect. If Agency conditionally disapproves any such exceptions, then Seller shall use Seller's
best efforts to cause such exceptions to be removed by the Close of Escrow. If such conditionally
disapproved non-monetary exceptions are not removed by the Close of Escrow, Agency may, at
Agency's option, either accept the Property subject to such encumbrances, or terminate the Escrow
and receive a refund of all funds deposited into Escrow (less Agency's share of escrow cancellation
charges), if any, and this Agreement shall thereupon be of no further force or effect. At the Close
of Escrow, Agency's fee title to the Property shall be free and clear of all monetary encumbrances.
5. Gram Deed. Seller covenants and agrees to deposit with Escrow Holder prior
to the Close of Escrow a Grant Deed duly executed and acknowledged by Seller, granting and
conveying to Agency the Property. The Grant Deed shall be in a form satisfactory to Agency and
Agency's counsel and shall be accepted by Agency prior to recording.
6. Authorization to Record Documents and Disburse Funds. a. Escrow
Holder is hereby authorized to record the documents and disburse the funds and documents called
for hereunder upon the Close of Escrow, provided each of the following conditions has then been
fulfilled:
(1) Title Company can issue in favor of Agency the Policy,
showing the Property vested in Agency subject only to the Permitted Title Exceptions.
Escrow Holder shall use the proceeds of the Purchase Price to obtain partial reconveyance, if
necessary, of any monetary liens encumbering the Property, so that the Property shall be free
and clear of monetary liens and encumbrances at the Close of Escrow.
(2) Escrow Holder shall have received Agency's notice of approval
or satisfaction or waiver of all of the contingencies to Agency 's obligations hereunder, as
provided for in Section 12.; and
(3)
Seller shall have deposited in Escrow the Grant Deed required
by Section 5.
R: \powcrsj \acquisitions\PSA. Irwin
2
b. Unless otherwise instructed in writing, Escrow Holder is authorized to record
at the Close of Escrow any instrument delivered through this Escrow if necessary or proper for
issuance of the Policy, including the Grant Deed.
7. Escrow. The parties hereby establish an escrow ("Escrow") to accommodate
the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. For purposes of this Agreement, Opening of
Escrow shall mean the date on which Escrow Holder shall have received a fully executed original of
this Agreement from Agency and Seller. Close of Escrow shall be the date upon which the Grant
Deed to Agency is delivered and recorded in the Official Records of the County of Riverside. The
Close of Escrow shall be on the date which is not later than the first business day occurring sixty
(60) days after the date of this Agreement. Before the Close of Escrow, all risk of loss and damage
to the Property from any source whatsoever shall be solely that of Seller.
8. Escrow Cha_rges and Prorations. Agency shall pay for the cost of the CLTA
Owner's Standard Coverage Policy of Title Insurance, the Escrow fees and Escrow Holder's
customary out-of-pocket expenses for messenger services, long distance telephone, etc. Agency
shall pay for recording the Grant Deed and any documentary or other local transfer taxes, and any
other recording fees. If the Escrow shall fail to close through no fault of either party, Agency shall
pay all Escrow cancellation charges.
9. License to Enter. Seller hereby grants to Agency and Agency's authorized
agents, contractors, consultants, assigns, attomeys, accountants and other representatives an
irrevocable license to enter upon the Property for the purpose of making inspections and other
examinations of the Property, including, but not limited to, the right to perform soil and geological
tests of the Property and an environmental site assessment thereof. Agency shall give Seller
reasonable notice before going on the Property. Agency does hereby indenmify and forever save
Seller, Seller' s heirs, successors and assigns, and the Property, free and harmless from and against
any and all liability, loss, damages and costs and expenses, demands, causes of action, claims or
judgments, whether or not arising from or occurring out of any damage to the Property as a result of
any accident or other occurrence at the Property which is in any way connected with Agency's
inspections or non-permanent improvements involving entrance onto the Property pursuant to this
Section. If Agency fails to acquire the Property due to Agency's default, this license shall terminate
upon the termination of Agency's right to purchase the Property. In such event, Agency shall
remove or cause to be removed all Agency's personal property, facilities, tools and equipment from
the Property.
10. Warranties and Representations of Seller. Seller hereby represents and
warrants to Agency the following, it being expressly understood and agreed that all such
representations and warranties are to be true and correct as of the Close of Escrow and shall survive
the Close of Escrow:
a. That (i) on the Close of Escrow the Property shall be free and clear of
any and all hazardous or toxic substances, materials, and waste, including, but not limited to,
asbestos; (ii) the Property is in compliance with all applicable statutes and regulations, including
R: \powersj\acquisitionsXPSA. Irwin
-3-
environmental, health and safety requirements; (iii) all businesses on the Property have disposed of
their waste in accordance with all applicable statutes, ordinances, and regulations; and (iv) Seller has
no notice of any pending or threatened action or proceeding arising out of the condition of the
Property or alleged violation of environmental, health or safety statutes, ordinance or regulations To
this end, it is agreed that notwithstanding the conveyance of the Property to Agency, Seller shall
indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless Agency from and against any and all claims,
liabilities, suits, losses, costs, expenses and damages, including but not limited to auorneys' fees and
costs, arising out of any claim for loss or damage to any property, including the Property, injuries to
or death of persons, or for the cost of cleaning up the Property and removing hazardous or toxic
substances, materials and waste therefrom, by reason of contamination or adverse effects on the
environment, or by reason of any statutes, ordinances, orders, rules or regulations of any
governmental entity or agency requiring the clean-up of the Property, caused by or resulting from
any hazardous material, substance or waste existing on, under or about the Property on the Close of
Escrow.
b. That Seller is the sole owner of the Property free and clear of all liens,
claims, encumbrances, easements, encroachments from adjacent properties, encroachments by
improvements or vegetation on the Property onto adjacent property, or rights of way of any nature,
other than those that may appear on the title commitment. Seller shall not further encumber the
Property or allow the Property or to be funher encumbered prior to the Close of Escrow.
c. Neither this Agreement nor anything provided to be done hereunder
including the transfer of the Property to Agency, violates or shall violate any contract, agreement or
instrument to which Seller is a party, or which affects the Property, and the sale of the Property
herein contemplated does not require the consent of any party not a signatory hereto.
d. There are no mechanics', materialmen's or similar claims or liens
presently claimed or which will be claimed against the Property for work performed or commenced
prior to the date of this Agreement. Seller agrees to hold Agency harmless from all costs, expenses,
liabilities, losses, charges, fees, including attorney fees, arising from or relating to any such lien or
any similar lien claimed against the Property and arising from work performed or commenced prior
to the Close of Escrow.
e. There are no written or oral leases or contractual right or option to
lease, purchase, or otherwise enjoy possession, rights or interest of any nature in and to the Property
or any pan thereof, and no persons have any right of possession to the Property or any pan thereof.
f. Seller has no knowledge of any pending, threatened or potential
litigation, action or proceeding against Seller or any other Party before any court or administrative
tribunal which is in any way related to the Property.
11. FULL PAYMENT OF ALL OBLIGATIONS OF AGENCY. It is
understood and agreed between Seller and Agency that the payments made to Seller as set forth in
this Agreement represent an all inclusive settlement and is full and complete payment for just
R: \powersj \acquisitionsXPSA. I twin
-4-
compensation for the acquisition of all property interests pertaining to the Property and includes and
satisfies any and all other payments, if any, which may be required by law to be paid to Seller
arising out of the acquisition and displacement of the Seller and persons residing on the Property,
and specifically includes, but is not limited to, claims for severance and other damages, attorney' s
fees, interest, expenses of litigation, expert' s f~es, precondemnation damages, inverse
condemnation, owner participation rights under the Redevelopment Plan, relocation assistance
and/or benefits under the Unifurm Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act
of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4601, et seq.), if applicable, or under Title 1, Division 7, Chapter 1 of the
Government Code of the State of California (Section 7260, et seq.), and loss of business goodwill
under the Eminent Domain Law, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.510, and all costs and
expenses whatever in connection therewith. Seller hereby acknowledges that Agency has advised
Seller of the possible availability of such relocation assistance rights to Seller and that the waiver of
all fights by Seller herein set forth are free and voluntary.
12. Agency's Contingencies. a. For the benefit of Agency, the Closing of Escrow
and the Agency's obligation to consummate the purchase of the Property shall be contingent upon
and subject to the occurrence of all of the following (or Agency's written waiver thereof, it being
agreed that Agency can waive any or all such contingencies) on or before the Close of Escrow:
(1) That as of the Close of Escrow the representations and
warranties of Seller contained in this Agreement are all true and correct.
(2) The delivery of all documents pursuant to Section 5. hereof.
(3) Title Company's commitment to issue in favor of Agency of a
CLTA Standard Coverage Owner's Policy of Title Insurance with liability equal to the
Purchase Price showing Agency's fee interest in the Property subject only to the Permitted
Title Exceptions.
(4) Agency's approval prior to the Close of Escrow of any
environmental site assessment, soils or geological reports, or other physical inspections of the
Property or the underlying real property that Agency might perform prior to the Close of
Escrow.
(5) Close of Escrow occur on the date which is not later than the
first business day occurring sixty (60) days after the date of this Agreement.
b. In the event one or more of the contingencies occurs, the Agency shall be
entitled to terminate this Agreement without being in breach or default under the Agreement, in
accordance with the procedures set fbrth in Section 14 of this Agreement. Seller further agrees that
in the event of the occurrence of any such contingencies and termination of this Agreement by
Agency, it will suffer no damages resulting from the termination or Agency's enactment of the
Resolution and that Agency shall have no liability to Seller whatsoever for such actions, except for
payment of its share of escrow cancellation fees.
R: \powersjXacquisi~ons\PSA. Irwin
5
13. Certification of Non-Foreign Status. Seller covenants to deliver to Escrow a
certification of Non-Foreign Stares in accordance with I.R.C. Section 1445, and a similar notice
pursuant to California Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 18805 and 26131, prior to the Close of
Escrow.
14. Default. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, in the event of a
breach or default under this Agreement by either Agency or Seller, the non-defaulting party shall
have, in addition to all rights available at law or equity, the right to terminate this Agreemere and
the Escrow for the purchase and sale of the Property, by delivering written notice thereof to the
det~tulting party and to Escrow Holder, and if Agency is the non-defaulting party, Agency shall
thereupon promptly receive a refund of all prior deposits, if any. Such termination of the Escrow by
a non-defaulting party shall be without prejudice to the non-defaulting party's rights and remedies at
law or equity.
15. Notices. All notices and demands shall be given in writing by certified mail,
postage prepaid, and return receipt requested, or by personal delivery. Notices shall be considered
given upon the earlier of (a) personal delivery, (b) two (2) business days following deposit in the
United States mail, postage prepaid, certified or registered, return receipt requested, or (c) one (1)
business day following deposit with an overnight carrier service. A copy of all notices shall be sent
to Escrow Holder. Notices shall be addressed as provided below for the respective party; provided
that if any party gives notice in writing of a change of name or address, notices to such party shall
thereafter be given as demanded in that notice:
Agency:
Redevelopmere Agency of the City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, Califomia 92590
Attn: Executive Director
COPY TO:
Richards, Watson & Gershon
333 So. Hope St., 38th FIr.
Los Angeles, California 90071
Attn: Peter M. Thorson, Esq.
SELLER:
Leslie Irwin
28516 Pujol Street
Temecula, California 92590
ESCROW
HOLDER
First American Title Company
3625 Fourteenth Street
Riverside, CA 92502
Attn: Deborah Newton
Escrow No.
R:\powersjXacquisitionsXPSA .Irwin
-6-
16. Broker's Commissions. Seller shall pay all claims of brokers,
agents or finders, licensed or unlicensed, and all claims of real estate or other consultants which
exist or may arise as a result of Seller's actions with respect to the Property. Agency shall not be
liable for any such fees or claims and Seller shall indemnify Agency, its officers, employees and
agents, from any and all costs, liabilities or judgments, including attorneys' fees, incurred in
defending or paying any such claims.
17. Further Instructions. Each party agrees to execute such other and further
escrow instructions as may be necessary or proper in order to consummate the transaction
contemplated by this Agreement.
18. Amendments. Any amendments to this Agreement shall be effective only
when duly executed by Agency and Seller and deposited with Escrow Holder.
19. Miscellaneous.
a. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted
under, and governed and enforced according to the laws of the State of California.
b. Entire Agreement. This Agreement supersedes any prior agreement,
oral or written, and together with the Exhibits hereto and any agreements delivered pursuant hereto,
contains the entire agreement between Agency and Seller on the subject matter hereof. No
subsequent agreement, representation or promise made by either party hereto, or by or to any
employee, officer, agent or representative of either party, shall be of any effect unless it is in writing
and executed by the party to be bound thereby. No person is authorized to make, and by execution
hereof Seller and Agency acknowledge that no person has made, any representation, warranty,
guaranty or promise except as set forth herein; and no agreement, statement, representation or
promise made by any such person which is not contained herein shall be valid or binding on Seller
or Agency.
c. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and
inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties
hereto.
d. Time of Essence. The parties acknowledge that time is of the essence
in this Agreement, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Escrow company's general
Escrow instructions.
R:\pow~rsj\ac, quisitions\PSA.Irwin
-7-
e. Remedies Not Exclusive and Waivers. No remedy conferred by any
of the specific provisions of this Agreement is intended to be exclusive of any other remedy and each
and every remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given
hereunder or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute or otherwise. The election of
any one or more remedies shall not constitute a waiver of the right to pursue other available
remedies.
f. Interpretation and Construction. The parties agree that each party
has reviewed and revised this Agreement and have had the opportunity to have their counsel and real
estate advisors review and revise this agreement and that any rule of construction to the effect that
ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not apply in the interpretation of this
Agreement or any amendments or exhibits thereto. In this Agreement the neuter gender includes the
feminine and masculine, and singular number includes the plural, and the words "person" and
"party" include corporation, parmership, firm, trust, or association wherever the context so requires.
The captions of the sections and subsections of this Agreement are for convenience and reference
only, and the words contained therein shall in no way be held to explain, modify, amplify or aid in
the interpretation, construction or meaning of the provisions of this Agreement.
g. Seller Consultations. Seller has reviewed the terms of the sale
of its property to the Agency and the effects of such sale with its legal counsel, tax consultant, and
real estate advisor. Seller warrants and represents to the Agency that except for the terms of this
Agreement and the recitals set forth herein, Seller has not relied on any statements, opinions, or
other comments of the Agency, its officers, employees, attorneys, consultants or agents and has
independently reviewed and verified such facts, tax consequences, and other matters as may be
important to Seller in connection with this transaction. Seller acknowledges and agrees that in the
event such matters turn out differently than Seller anticipates at this time, Seller shall assume all
responsibility and liability for such matters and shall have no recourse against the Agency for such
changes.
h. Executive Director's Authority. The Executive Director is hereby
directed and authorized to execute such other documents, including without limitation, escrow
instructions and amendments thereto, certificates of acceptance, agreements for payments of lost
rent, or certifications, as may be necessary or convenient to implement the terms of this Agreement.
20. Attorneys' Fees. If either party hereto incurs attorneys' fees in order to
enforce, defend or interpret any of the terms, provisions or conditions of this Agreement or because
of a breach of this Agreement by the other party, the prevailing party, whether by suit, negotiation,
arbitration or settlement shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees from the other party.
21. Assignment. Agency may assign its rights under this Agreement or may
designate a nominee to acquire title to the Property, provided, however, that any such assignment or
designation shall not relieve Agency of any of its obligations under this Agreement.
R:\powersj\ac, q~istsions~PSA.Irwin - 8 -
22. Escrow Holder Need Not Be Concerned. Escrow Holder is not to be
concerned with Section 9, 10, 11 and 16 hereof, and Agency and Seller release Escrow Holder from
liability or obligation as to Section 9, 10, 11 and 16 hereof.
IN WITNESS WItEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the
day and year first written above.
SELLER
Leslie Irwin
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, a public body, corporate and politic:
Karel Lindemans
Chairperson
ATTEST:
By
Susan Jones, Agency Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By
Peter M. Thorson
Agency Attorney
R:\powenj\acquimiomXPSA.Irwin - 9 -
EXHIBIT "A"
Legal Description of the Property
THE SOUTHEASTERLY 85 FEET OF THE NORTHWESTERLY 255 FEET OF THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY:
THE NORTHWESTERLY HALF OF THAT TRACT OF LAND FORMERLY USED AS A
RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY AND STATION GROUND OF THE ATCHINSON, TOPEKA
AND SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY, CONVEYED TO N. R. VAIL, ET AL, BY DEED
RECORDED JUNE 11, 1940, IN BOOK 464, PAGE 505 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, SAID PROPERTY BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 27, AS SHOWN BY
MAP OF TEMECULA RECORDED IN BOOK 15, PAGE 726 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTY RECORDER, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA: THENCE
SOUTHWESTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 1,
BLOCK 36 AS SHOWN BY SAID MAP: THENCE NORTHWESTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE
TO THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 10, BLOCK 37, AS SHOWN BY SAID MAP:
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ON A STRAIGHT LINE TO THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER
OF LOT 22, BLOCK 25, AS SHOWN BY SAID MAP: THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY IN A
STRAIGHT LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE
PORTIONS INCLUDED IN RIVER AND PUJOL STREETS, AS SHOWN BY SAID MAP.
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99-
A RESOLIYFION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ~ REDEVEL-
OPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT
CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITI,ED "PURCHASE AND SAI,E AGREE-
MENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS" FOR ACQUISITION OF
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE 28500 BLOCK OF
PUJOL STREET (APN 922-053-008) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ~ REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HF, REBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula
hereby finds, determines and declares that:
a. The Agency is currently implementing the Redevelopment Plan for
Redevelopment Project No. 1--1988, originally approved by the Board of Supervisors of
Riverside County on July 12, 1988 prior to incorporation of the City of Temecula and
subsequently approved and transferred to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Temecula on April 9, 1991 (the "Plan").
b. The Agency proposes to purchase the property described in the "Purchase
and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions" attached hereto as Exhibit A. and located
generally in the 28500 block of Pujol Street (APN 922-0053-008) in the City of Temecula
for redevelopment purposes consistent with the Agency authority under the Plan and the
Community Redevelopment Act, Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.
c. The Agreement is consistent with the Plan and with the Implementation
Plan adopted by the Agency.
d. The Agency Board has duly considered all terms and conditions of the
proposed Agreement and believes that such agreement is in the best interests of the Agency
and City and the health, safety, and welfare of its residents, and in accord with the public
purposes and provisions of applicable State and local law requirements.
e. This action is being undertaken pursuant to the Plan for which a full and
complete Environmental Impact Report was prepared and certified prior to adoption of the
Plan. Moreover the acquisition of property by itself will have no impact on the
environment as it is simply the change in ownership of the property without a change in
the physical condition of the property. None of the conditions described in 14 Cat.
Admin. Code § 15162 are found to exist. Therefore, pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
R:\powersj\acquisitions\reso. Otto
and, specifically, 14 Cal. Admin. Code §§ 15162 and 15180, neither a subsequem nor a
supplemental Environmental Impact Report is required for the subject agreemere.
Section 2. The Board of Directors of the Redevelopmere Agency of the City of Temecula
hereby approves that certain "Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions" between the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, a public body corporate and politic, and Leslie
Irwin, which Purchase Agreement is dated as of September 14, 1999. The Chairperson of the
Agency are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Agency.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula on September 14, 1999.
Karel F. Lindemans, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
Acting Agency Secretary/City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:kpowersj\acquisitions\reso. Otto
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
SS
I, Susan W. Jones, Acting Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. RDA 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency at a regular meeting thereof held on the
14 th day of
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
September
, 1999, by the following vote:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
Acting Agency Secretary/City Clerk
R:\powersj\acquisitions\reso. Otto
EXHIBIT "A"
OF
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT
AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS
THIS PURCHASE AND SAI,F, AGREEMENT AND ESCROW
INSTRUCTIONS ("Agreement") is dated and entered into as of September 14, 1999 by and
between The Otto Family Trust ("Seller"), and the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, a public body, corporate and politic ("Agency"), and constitutes both an
agreement to purchase and sell real property between the parties and the parties' escrow instructions
directed to First American Title Insurance Company ("Escrow Holder"). In consideration of the
premises operative provisions and the recitals set forth in this Agreement, the parties hereto agree as
follows:
1. Recitals. The parties hereto represent to each other that the following
facts and purposes are true and correct:
a. On May 25, 1999 the Agency delivered Seller an offer (the "Offer") to
purchase the real property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof (the
"Property").
b. Following delivery of the Offer Agency and Seller negotiated terms by
which the Agency would acquire the Property so as to avoid eminent domain proceedings and now
desire to set forth in this Agreement the terms and conditions of the Agency's acquisition of the
Property..
c. Agency intends to use the Property for public purposes allowed by law,
including, but not limited to, subsequent conveyance of the Property to other govemmental entities
for public purposes.
2. Purchase and Sale. On the Close of Escrow (as herein defined), Seller agrees
to sell the Property to Agency, and Agency agrees to buy the Property from Seller, on the terms and
conditions hereinafter set forth.
3. Purchase Price. The purchase price for the Property to be paid by Agency is
the sum of eighty thousand dollars ($) (the "Purchase Price"), which sum shall be paid in full in cash
on the Close of Escrow together with Agency' s share of the closing costs.
4. Title and Title Insurance. Upon the Opening of Escrow, Escrow Holder
shall order from First American Title Company ("Title Company") a title commitment for the
Property. Escrow Holder shall also request two copies each of all instruments identified as
exceptions on said title commitment. Upon receipt of the foregoing, Escrow Holder shall deliver
these instruments and the title commitment to Agency and Seller. Agency's fee title to the Property
shall be insured at the Close of Escrow by a CLTA Owner' s Standard Coverage Policy of Title
Insurance in the amount of the Purchase Price (the "Policy"). The Policy of title insurance provided
8130199 RDA Purchase Agreement
for pursuant to this Section shall insure Agency's fee interest in the Property free and clear of all
liens, encumbrances, restrictions, and rights-of-way of record, subject only to the following
permitted conditions of title ("Permitted Title Exceptions"):
a. The applicable zoning, building and development regulations of any
municipality, county, state or federal jurisdiction affecting the Property; and
b. Those non-monetary exceptions approved by Agency within fifteen
(15) business days after the date Agency receives the title commitment and legible copies of all
instruments noted as exceptions therein. If Agency unconditionally disapproves any such excep-
tions, Escrow shall thereupon terminate, all funds deposited therein shall be refunded to Agency
(less Agency's share of escrow cancellation charges), and this Agreement shall be of no further force
or effect. If Agency conditionally disapproves any such exceptions, then Seller shall use Seller' s
best efforts to cause such exceptions to be removed by the Close of Escrow. If such conditionally
disapproved non-monetary exceptions are not removed by the Close of Escrow, Agency may, at
Agency's option, either accept the Property subject to such encumbrances, or terminate the Escrow
and receive a refund of all funds deposited into Escrow (less Agency's share of escrow cancellation
charges), if any, and this Agreement shall thereupon be of no further force or effect. At the Close
of Escrow, Agency's fee title to the Property shall be free and clear of all monetary encumbrances.
5. Grant Deed. Seller covenants and agrees to deposit with Escrow Holder prior
to the Close of Escrow a Grant Deed duly executed and acknowledged by Seller, granting and
conveying to Agency the Property. The Grant Deed shall be in a form satisfactory to Agency and
Agency's counsel and shall be accepted by Agency prior to recording.
6. Authorization to Record Documents and Disburse Funds. a. Escrow
Holder is hereby authorized to record the documents and disburse the funds and documents called
for hereunder upon the Close of Escrow, provided each of the following conditions has then been
fulfilled:
(1) Title Company can issue in favor of Agency the Policy,
showing the Property vested in Agency subject only to the Permitted Title Exceptions.
Escrow Holder shall use the proceeds of the Purchase Price to obtain partial reconveyance, if
necessary, of any monetary liens encumbering the Property, so that the Property shall be free
and clear of monetary liens and encumbrances at the Close of Escrow.
(2) Escrow Holder shall have received Agency's notice of approval
or satisfaction or waiver of all of the contingencies to Agency's obligations hereunder, as
provided for in Section 12.; and
(3)
Seller shall have deposited in Escrow the Grant Deed required
by Section 5.
b. Unless otherwise instructed in writing, Escrow Holder is authorized to record
at the Close of Escrow any instrument delivered through this Escrow if necessary or proper for
issuance of the Policy, including the Grant Deed.
8/30/99 RDA Pure_.hase Agreement - 2 -
7. Escrow. The parties hereby establish an escrow ("Escrow") to accommodate
the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. For purposes of this Agreement, Opening of
Escrow shall mean the date on which Escrow Holder shall have received a fully executed original of
this Agreement from Agency and Seller. Close of Escrow shall be the date upon which the Grant
Deed to Agency is delivered and recorded in the Official Records of the County of Riverside. The
Close of Escrow shall be on the date which is not later than the first business day occurring sixty
(60) days after the date of this Agreement. Before the Close of Escrow, all risk of loss and damage
to the Property from any source whatsoever shall be solely that of Seller.
8. Escrow Charges and Prorations. Agency shall pay for the cost of the CLTA
Owner's Standard Coverage Policy of Title Insurance, the Escrow fees and Escrow Holder's
customary out-of-pocket expenses for messenger services, long distance telephone, etc. Agency
shall pay for recording the Grant Deed and any documentary or other local transfer taxes, and any
other recording fees. If the Escrow shall fail to close through no fault of either party, Agency shall
pay all Escrow cancellation charges.
9. License to Enter. Seller hereby grants to Agency and Agency's authorized
agents, contractors, consultants, assigns, attorneys, accountants and other representatives an
irrevocable license to enter upon the Property for the purpose of making inspections and other
examinations of the Property, including, but not limited to, the right to perform soil and geological
tests of the Property and an environmental site assessment thereof. Agency shall give Seller
reasonable notice before going on the Property. Agency does hereby indemnify and forever save
Seller, Seller' s heirs, successors and assigns, and the Property, free and harmless from and against
any and all liability, loss, damages and costs and expenses, demands, causes of action, claims or
judgments, whether or not arising from or occurring out of any damage to the Property as a result of
any accident or other occurrence at the Property which is in any way connected with Agency's
inspections or non-permanent improvements involving entrance onto the Property pursuant to this
Section. If Agency fails to acquire the Property due to Agency's default, this license shall terminate
upon the termination of Agency's right to purchase the Property. In such event, Agency shall
remove or cause to be removed all Agency's personal property, facilities, tools and equipment from
the Property.
10. Warranties and Representations of Seller. Seller hereby represents and
warrants to Agency the following, it being expressly understood and agreed that all such
representations and warranties are to be true and correct as of the Close of Escrow and shall survive
the Close of Escrow:
a. That (i) on the Close of Escrow the Property shall be free and clear of
any and all hazardous or toxic substances, materials, and waste, including, but not limited to,
asbestos; (ii) the Property is in compliance with all applicable statutes and regulations, including
environmental, health and safety requirements; (iii) all businesses on the Property have disposed of
their waste in accordance with all applicable statutes, ordinances, and regulations; and (iv) Seller has
no notice of any pending or threatened action or proceeding arising out of the condition of the
Property or alleged violation of environmental, health or safety statutes, ordinance or regulations To
8/30/99 RDA Purchase Agreement 3
this end, it is agreed that notwithstanding the conveyance of the Property to Agency, Seller shall
indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless Agency from and against any and all claims,
liabilities, suits, losses, costs, expenses and damages, including but not limited to attorneys' fees and
costs, arising out of any claim for loss or damage to any property, including the Property, injuries to
or death of persons, or for the cost of cleaning up the Property and removing hazardous or toxic
substances, materials and waste therefrom, by reason of contamination or adverse effects on the
environment, or by reason of any statutes, ordinances, orders, rules or regulations of any
governmental entity or agency requiring the clean-up of the Property, caused by or resulting from
any hazardous material, substance or waste existing on, under or about the Property on the Close of
Escrow.
b. That Seller is the sole owner of the Property free and clear of all liens,
claims, encumbrances, easements, encroachments from adjacent properties, encroachmerits by
improvements or vegetation on the Property onto adjacent property, or rights of way of any nature,
other than those that may appear on the title commitment. Seller shall not further encumber the
Property or allow the Property or to be further encumbered prior to the Close of Escrow.
c. Neither this Agreement nor anything provided to be done hereunder
including the transfer of the Property to Agency, violates or shall violate any contract, agreement or
instrument to which Seller is a party, or which affects the Property, and the sale of the Property
herein contemplated does not require the consent of any party not a signatory hereto.
d. There are no mechanics', materialmeWs or similar claims or liens
presently claimed or which will be claimed against the Property for work performed or commenced
prior to the date of this Agreement. Seller agrees to hold Agency harmless from all costs, expenses,
liabilities, losses, charges, fees, including attorney fees, arising from or relating to any such lien or
any similar lien claimed against the Property and arising from work performed or commenced prior
to the Close of Escrow.
e. There are no written or oral leases or contractual right or option to
lease, purchase, or otherwise enjoy possession, rights or interest of any nature in and to the Property
or any part thereof, and no persons have any right of possession to the Property or any pan thereof.
f. Seller has no knowledge of any pending, threatened or potential
litigation, action or proceeding against Seller or any other Party before any court or administrative
tribunal which is in any way related to the Property.
11. FULL PAYMENT OF ALL OBLIGATIONS OF AGENCY. It is
understood and agreed between Seller and Agency that the payments made to Seller as set forth in
this Agreement represent an all inclusive settlement and is full and complete payment for just
compensation for the acquisition of all property interests pertaining to the Property and includes and
satisfies any and all other payments, if any, which may be required by law to be paid to Seller
arising out of the acquisition and displacement of the Seller and persons residing on the Property,
and specifically includes, but is not limited to, claims for severance and other damages, attorney' s
8/30t99 RDA Pin'chase Agreement - 4 -
fees, interest, expenses of litigation, expert' s fees, precondemnation damages, inverse
condemnation, owner participation rights under the Redevelopment Plan, relocation assistance
and/or benefits under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act
of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4601, et seq.), if applicable, or under Title 1, Division 7, Chapter 1 of the
Government Code of the State of California (Section 7260, et seq.), and loss of business goodwill
under the Eminem Domain Law, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.510, and all costs and
expenses whatever in connection therewith. Seller hereby acknowledges that Agency has advised
Seller of the possible availability of such relocation assistance rights to Seller and that the waiver of
all fights by Seller herein set forth are free and voluntary.
12. Agency 's Contingencies. a. For the benefit of Agency, the Closing of Escrow
and the Agency' s obligation to consummate the purchase of the Property shall be contingent upon
and subject to the occurrence of all of the following (or Agency's written waiver thereof, it being
agreed that Agency can waive any or all such contingencies) on or before the Close of Escrow:
(1) That as of the Close of Escrow the representations and
warranties of Seller contained in this Agreement are all tree and correct.
(2) The delivery of all documents pursuant to Section 5. hereof.
(3) Title Company's commitment to issue in favor of Agency of a
CLTA Standard Coverage Owner' s Policy of Title Insurance with liability equal to the
Purchase Price showing Agency's fee interest in the Property subject only to the Permitted
Title Exceptions.
(4) Agency's approval prior to the Close of Escrow of any
environmental site assessment, soils or geological reports, or other physical inspections of the
Property or the underlying real property that Agency might perform prior to the Close of
Escrow.
(5) Close of Escrow occur on the date which is not later than the
first business day occurring sixty (60) days after the date of this Agreement.
b. In the event one or more of the contingencies occurs, the Agency shall be
entitled to terminate this Agreement without being in breach or default under the Agreement, in
accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 14 of this Agreement. Seller further agrees that
in the event of the occurrence of any such contingencies and termination of this Agreement by
Agency, it will suffer no damages resulting from the termination or Agency's enactment of the
Resolution and that Agency shall have no liability to Seller whatsoever for such actions, except for
payment of its share of escrow cancellation fees.
13. Certification of Non-Foreign Status. Seller covenants to deliver to Escrow a
certification of Non-Foreign Status in accordance with I.R.C. Section 1445, and a similar notice
8130199 RDA hrchae Agreemere 5
pursuant to California Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 18805 and 26131, prior to the Close of
Escrow.
14. Default. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, in the event of a
breach or default under this Agreement by either Agency or Seller, the non-defaulting party shall
have, in addition to all rights available at law or equity, the right to terminate this Agreement and
the Escrow for the purchase and sale of the Property, by delivering written notice thereof to the
defaulting party and to Escrow Holder, and if Agency is the non-defaulting party, Agency shall
thereupon promptly receive a refund of all prior deposits, if any. Such termination of the Escrow by
a non-defaulting party shall be without prejudice to the non-defaulting party 's rights and remedies at
law or equity.
15. Notices. All notices and demands shall be given in writing by certified mall,
postage prepaid, and remm receipt requested, or by personal delivery. Notices shall be considered
given upon the earlier of (a) personal delivery, (b) two (2) business days following deposit in the
United States mall, postage prepaid, certified or registered, return receipt requested, or (c) one (1)
business day following deposit with an overnight carrier service. A copy of all notices shall be sent
to Escrow Holder. Notices shall be addressed as provided below for the respective party; provided
that if any party gives notice in writing of a change of name or address, notices to such party shall
thereafter be given as demanded in that notice:
Agency:
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attn: Executive Director
COPY TO:
Richards, Watson & Gershon
333 So. Hope St., 38th FIr.
Los Angeles, Calitbmia 90071
Atm: Peter M. Thorson, Esq.
SELLER:
Otto Family Trust
Judith Jones
29633 Carmel Road
Sun City, California 92586
ESCROW
HOLDER
First American Title Company
3625 Fourteenth Street
Riverside, CA 92502
Atm: Deborah Newton
Escrow No.
8/30199 RDA Purchase Agrcemo~t - 6 -
16. Broker's Commitions. Seller shall pay all claims of brokers,
agents or finders, licensed or unlicensed, and all claims of real estate or other consultants which
exist or may arise as a result of Seller's actions with respect to the Property. Agency shall not be
liable for any such fees or claims and Seller shall indemnify Agency, its officers, employees and
agents, from any and all costs, liabilities or judgments, including attorneys' fees, incurred in
defending or paying any such claims.
17. Further ln~ructions. Each party agrees to execute such other and further
escrow instructions as may be necessary or proper in order to consummate the transaction
contemplated by this Agreement.
18. Amendments. Any amendments to this Agreement shall be effective only
when duly executed by Agency and Seller and deposited with Escrow Holder.
19. Miscellaneous.
a. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted
under, and governed and enforced according to the laws of the State of California.
b. Entire Agreement. This Agreement supersedes any prior agreement,
oral or written, and together with the Exhibits hereto and any agreements delivered pursuant hereto,
contains the entire agreement between Agency and Seller on the subject matter hereof. No
subsequent agreement, representation or promise made by either party hereto, or by or to any
employee, officer, agent or representative of either party, shall be of any effect unless it is in writing
and executed by the party to be bound thereby. No person is authorized to make, and by execution
hereof Seller and Agency acknowledge that no person has made, any representation, warranty,
guaranty or promise except as set forth herein; and no agreement, statement, representation or
promise made by any such person which is not contained herein shall be valid or binding on Seller
or Agency.
c. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and
inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties
hereto.
d. Time of Essence. The parties acknowledge that time is of the essence
in this Agreement, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Escrow company' s general
Escrow instructions.
e. Remedies Not Exclusive and Waivers. No remedy conferred by any
of the specific provisions of this Agreement is intended to be exclusive of any other remedy and each
and every remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given
hereunder or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute or otherwise. The election of
any one or more remedies shall not constitute a waiver of the fight to pursue other available
remedies.
8/30/99 RDA Purchase Agreement - 7 -
f. Interpretation and Construction. The parties agree that each party
has reviewed and revised this Agreement and have had the opportunity to have their counsel and real
estate advisors review and revise this agreement and that any rule of construction to the effect that
ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not apply in the interpretation of this
Agreement or any amendments or exhibits thereto. In this Agreement the neuter gender includes the
feminine and masculine, and singular number includes the plural, and the words "person" and
"party" include corporation, parmership, firm, trust, or association wherever the context so requires.
The captions of the sections and subsections of this Agreement are for convenience and reference
only, and the words contained therein shall in no way be held to explain, modify, amplify or aid in
the interpretation, construction or meaning of the provisions of this Agreement.
g. Seller Consultations. Seller has reviewed the terms of the sale
of its property to the Agency and the effects of such sale with its legal counsel, tax consultant, and
real estate advisor. Seller warrants and represents to the Agency that except tbr the terms of this
Agreement and the recitals set forth herein, Seller has not relied on any statements, opinions, or
other comments of the Agency, its officers, employees, attorneys, consultants or agents and has
independently reviewed and verified such facts, tax consequences, and other matters as may be
important to Seller in connection with this transaction. Seller acknowledges and agrees that in the
event such matters turn out differently than Seller anticipates at this time, Seller shall assume all
responsibility and liability for such matters and shall have no recourse against the Agency for such
changes.
h. Executive Director's Authority. The Executive Director is hereby
directed and authorized to execute such other documents, including without limitation, escrow
instructions and amendments thereto, certificates of acceptance, agreements for payments of lost
rent, or certifications, as may be necessary or convenient to implement the terms of this Agreement.
20. Attorneys' Fees. If either party hereto incurs attorneys' fees in order to
enforce, defend or interpret any of the terms, provisions or conditions of this Agreement or because
of a breach of this Agreement by the other party, the prevailing party, whether by suit, negotiation,
arbitration or settlement shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees from the other party.
21. Assignment. Agency may assign its rights under this Agreement or may
designate a nominee to acquire title to the Property, provided, however, that any such assignment or
designation shall not relieve Agency of any of its obligations under this Agreement.
22. Escrow Holder Need Not Be Concerned. Escrow Holder is not to be
concerned with Section 9, 10, 11 and 16 hereof, and Agency and Seller release Escrow Holder from
liability or obligation as to Section 9, 10, 11 and 16 hereof.
8/30/99 RDA Purchase Agreemere - 8 -
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the
day and year first written above.
SELLER
Judith Ann Jones, Co-trustee
Richard M. Brunelle, Co-trustee
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, a public body, corporate and politic:
Karel Lindemans
Chairperson
ATTEST:
By
Susan Jones, Agency Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By
Peter M. Thorson
Agency Attorney
8130199 RDA Purchase Agreeme~ 9
Legal Description of the Property
THE SOUTHEASTERLY 85 FEET OF THE NORTHWESTERLY 340 FEET OF THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL:
THE NORTHWESTERLY HALF OF THAT TRACT OF LAND FORMERLY USED AS A
RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY AND STATION GROUND OF THE ATCHINSON, TOPEKA
AND SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY, CONVEYED TO N.R. VAIL, ET AL, BY DEED
RECORDED JUNE 11, 1940 IN BOOK 464 PAGE 505 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 27, AS SHOWN BY
MAP OF TEMECULA RECORDED IN BOOK 15 PAGE 726 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER
OF LOT 1, BLOCK 36, AS SHOWN BY MAP: THENCE NORTHWESTERLY IN A STRAIGHT
LINE TO THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 10, BLOCK 37, AS SHOWN ON SAID
MAP, THENCE NORTHEASTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO THE MOST WESTERLY
CORNER OF LOT 22, BLOCK 25 ON SAID MAP; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY IN A
STRAIGHT LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE
PORTIONS INCLUDED IN RIVER AND PUJOL STREETS AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP.
ITEM 3
APPROVALT~~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIREC
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance )~'
September 14, 1999
Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
PREPARED BY:
William B. Pattison, Senior t
RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency Members receive and file the Financial Statements
for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999.
DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited activity of the
Redevelopment Agency for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999, Please see the attached
financial statements for the analytical review of financial activity.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1999
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for
the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1999
and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in
Fund Balance For The Fiscal Year Ended
June 30, 1999
(Unaudited)
Prepared by the Finance Department
Temecula Redevelopment Agency
Combining Balance Sheet
As of June 30, 1999
Assets:
Cash and investments
Receivables
Land held for resale
Total assets
Low/IVIod
Fund
$ 4,794,270
1,588,600
6,382,870
CIP
Fund
$ 727,054
428,047
2,103,053
Debt
Service
$ 4,521,225
546,064
Total
$ 10,042,549
2,562,711
2,103,053
$ 3,258,154 $ 5,067,289 $ 14,708,313
Liabilities and fund balances:
Liabilities:
Other current liabilities
Deferred revenue
Total liabilities
Fund balances:
Reserved
Designated
Total fund balances
Total liabilities
and fund balances
$ 37,797
647,510
685,307
5,697,563
5,697,563
$ 6,382,870
$ 680,082
157,059
837,141
2,680,305 $
(259,292)
2,421,013
$ 3,258,154 $
1,448,920
3,618,369
5,067,289
5,067,289
$ 717,879
804,569
1,522,448
9,826,788
3,359,077
13,185,865
$ 14,708,313
Please note that these balances are unaudited
City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
Redevelopment Agency Low/Moderate Income Housing
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
Revenues:
Property tax increment
Investment interest
Rental income
Miscellaneous
Proceeds from Mission Village project
TotalRevenues
Alulua]
Amended YTD
Budget Activity
1,137,500 $ 1,139,902
150,000 164,139
15,900 8,823
32,700 47,213
1,670,294
1,336,100 3,030,371
Encumbr.
Total
Activity
$ 1,139,902
164,139
8,823
47,213
1,670,294
3,030,371
Percent
of Budget
100%
109%
55%
144%
227%
Expenditures: Salaries and wages
Operating and administrative expenditures
Homebuyer programs
Residential rehabilitation programs
Housing development & acquisition
Affordable housing / future obligation
Pujol & Sherwood Apts. operating costs
187,270 177,680
296,470 226,241
589,000 183,720
201,045 152,603
2,300,000 348,229
435,000 130,000
12,900 12,820
17,280
595
177,680
243,521
183,720
153,198
348,229
130,000
12,820
Total Expenditures 4,021,685 1,231,293 17,875 1,249,168
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures
(2,685,585) 1,799,078
3,898,485 3,898,485
1,212,900 $ 5,697,563
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1998
Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 1999 $
95%
82%
31% (1)
76%
15%
30%
99%
31%
(1) The variance in Homebuyer programs is primarily due to no expenditures being incurred for the Specialized
Homebuyers Program.
City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
Redevelopment Agency-CIP
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
Annual
Amended YTD
Budget Activity
Revenues:
Investment interest $ 240,000 $ 196,664
Rental income 71,000 123,006
Loan interest 20,000 24,010
Miscellaneous 47,502
Operating transfers in 625,000 625,000
Total Revenues 956,000 1,016, 182
Encumbr.
Capital Projects: (1)
Winchester Road interchange
First Street bridge
Old Town building facades
Front Street widening
Old Town streetscape
Old Town parking
Operating transfers out
Operations and Maintenance: Salaries and wages
Operating and administrative expenditures
City admin charges
Consulting services
Legal services
Owner participation agreements
Old Town plan implementation
Banner program
Total Expenditures
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1998
Ending Fund Balmice, June 30, 1999
67,890 11,319
93,296 538
117,875 69,456
265,000 152,044
5,139,522 4,925,143
875,000 206,255
2,085,500 1,472,717
95,280 85,957
109,371 149,819
25,000 25,000
73,201 42,151
53,000 48,728
274,000 268,903
162,000 152,000
13,000 13,406
9,448,935 7,623,436
(8,492,935) (6,607,254)
9,028,267 9,028,267
535,332 $ 2,421,013
Total
ActiviW
196,664
123,006
24,010
47,502
625,000
1,016,182
Percent
of Budget
82%
173%
120%
100%
106%
34,685 46,004 68%
74,946 75,484 81%
31,486 100,942 86%
1,172 153,216 58%
198,790 5,123,933 100%
206,255 24%
1,472,717 71%
85,957 90%
1,049 150,868 138% (2)
25,000 100%
16,230 58,381 80%
48,728 92%
268,903 98%
1,854 153,854 95%
13,406 103%
360,212 7,983,648 84%
(1) The variances in CIP project expenditures and operating transfers out are due to the timing of when the various
projects are started.
(2) Includes the write-off of the $61,740 remaining balance of the Blind Pig small business loan.
City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes m Fund Balm~ce - Budget and Actual
Redevelopment Agency - Debt Service
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999
Revenues:
Property tax increment
Investment interest
Advances from other funds
Deferred passthrough
Total Revenues
Annual
Amended YII)
Budget Activity
$ 4,550,100 4,559,604
150,000 $ 244,935
75,750 75,749
707,400 707,436
5,483,250 5,587,724
Expenditures:
Passthrough agreements
Debt service - principal
Debt service - interest
Trustees admin fees
Operating transfers out
Total Expenditures
Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1998
Ending Fund Balance, June 30, 1999
3,357,100 3,360,917
655,000 655,000
879,670 869,669
7,500 6,086
625,000 625,000
5,524,270 5,516,672
(41,020) 71,052
4,996,237 4,996,237
4,955,217 $ 5,067,289
Percent
of Budget
100%
163%(1)
100%
100%
102%
100%
100%
99%
81%
100%
100%
(1) The variance is primarily due to a greater than anticipated cash balance.
ITEM 4
EN APPROVAL
G . COUNSEL
DIRECTOR OF FINAN
EXECUTIVE DIR.
CITY OFTEMECULA
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENTAGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Executive Director/Agency Members
FROM:
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE:
September 14, 1999
SUBJECT:
Approve the Manufacturing and Purchase of Freeway Signage for Old Town
Front Street on 1-15, Project No. PW99-08
PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Senior Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Redevelopment Agency Board:
Approve the manufacturing and purchase of freeway guide sign panels for use on 1-15 to
Safeway Sign Company of Adelanto, California, in the amount of $35,305.75 (including
sales tax).
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders, not to exceed a contingency
amount of $3,194.25, which is equal to the balance of the appropriated funds and 9% of
the purchase amount.
Approve an appropriation of $30,000.00 from Redevelopment Agency Unreserved Fund
Balance to the project account.
BACKGROUND: At the December 15, 1998 Public Hearing, the City Council
adopted Resolution 98-126 changing the name of "Front Street" from State Route 79 South to
Rancho California Road to "Old Town Front Street". Subsequently, the City Council directed
staff to work with Caltrans to change a number of existing freeway signs and add new signs on
1-15. The change would incorporate the name "Old Town Front Street" on all new signs. City
staff requested Caltrans' approval of the desired changes. After numerous meetings and
discussions, Caltrans and the City mutually agreed on the proposed changes. Exhibit "2"
attached describes all new sign installations and modifications. The attached location map,
Exhibit "3", indicates where each sign will be installed. On July 23, 1999, Caltrans issued an
encroachment permit allowing the City to do the work within their right-of-way.
Staff utilized the informal bid process to request proposals for manufacturing and installing the
signs. A request for proposal was sent to five (5) different companies. The City did not receive
any proposals.
In order to have the work done, staff separated manufacturing of the signs from installation.
Caltrans provided staff with a list of three (3) sign manufacturing companies approved and
utilized by Caltrans. Staff solicited proposals from these three (3) companies. Two (2)
companies submitted proposals as follows:
1
RAAGDRPT\99\0914\PW99-08SIGNS.doc
Company Proposal Amount (excluding sales tax)
Safeway Sign Company
Maneri Sign Company
Zumar Industries
$32,766.36
$38,946.25
did not submit
Safeway Sign Company submitted the lowest proposal to manufacture the signs which,
including sales tax, totals $35,305.75.
Staff is looking into options to have the signs installed. If a contractor is to be utilized for the
installation, the City would need a separate contract for installation as soon as the signs are
manufactured and delivered.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Freeway Signage for Old Town Front Street project is a
Capital Improvement Project funded by Redevelopment Agency funds. Funds are available for
manufacturing and purchase of the signs in Account No. 280-199-829-5804. An additional
appropriation of $30,000 is necessary from the Redevelopment Agency Unreserved Funds
Balance for this project for administration and construction installation costs.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. CIP Project Description
2. Description of signs to be installed
3. Location Map for proposed signs
4. Proposals submitted
R:~AGDRPT~99\0914\PW99-08SIGNS.doc
PROJECT NO. PW99-08
MANUFACTURING AND DELIVERY OF FREEWAY GUIDE SIGN PANELS AND FORMED
SIGN OVERLAY FOR USE ON 1-15 IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DESCRIPTION, SIGN CONTENT AND QUANTITIES
EXISTING SIGN PANEL REPLACEMENT ON EXISTING FRAMES AND STRUCTURES
SIGN
NO.
SIGN CONTENT AND DIMENSIONS
(VERT. X HORIZ.)
SIGN QUANTITY LETTER SIZES
LOCATION (SQUARE FOOT) & SPACING
Rancho Calif. Rd. Existing Sign Size Letter sizes:
Old Town Front St. 90" x 20' Southbound, on the Capital - 13.3"
150 Lower Case - 10"
EXIT 11/4 MILES (as field measured) Winchester Bridge
Spacing: 10"
SOUTH Indio Existing Sign Size Letter sizes:
~ ~ 110" x 19' Northbound, one mile Capital - 13.Y'
(Old NP-6) Old Town Front St. (as field measured) south of the SR 79 South 174.17 Lower Case - 10"
EXIT 1 MILE off-ramp
Spacing: 10"
PROPOSED NEW FREEWAY ROADSIDE SIGNS (NS)
(ON TWO LAMINATED WOOD BOX POSTS, PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLANS (JULY, 1997 EDITION) RS1, RS2,
AND RS3)
SIGN
NO.
SIGN CONTENT AND DIMENSIONS
(VERT. X HORIZ.)
Proposed Sign Size
Old Town Front St. 30" x 19'
NEXT RIGHT
Proposed Sign Size
Old Town Front St. 30" x 19'
NEXT RIGHT
SIGN
LOCATION
Southbound, between
Winchester and Rancho
California off-ramps
~ 1/2 Mile before
Rancho California off-
ramp)
Southbound, between
the Rancho California
and the SR 79 South off-
ramps (just north of the
Santiago overcrossing)
QUANTITY LETTER SIZES
(SQUARE FOOT) & SPACING
Letter sizes*:
Capital - 13.Y'
47.5 Lower Case - 10"
Spacing: 10"
Letter sizes*:
Capital - 13.3"
47.5 Lower Case - 10"
Spacing: 10"
"NEXT RIGHT" letters shall be 10" Capital
8/24/99 Page 1 of 2
PROJECT NO. PW99-08
MANUFACTURING AND DELIVERY OF FREEWAY GUIDE SIGN PANELS AND FORMED
SIGN OVERLAY FOR USE ON 1-15 IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DESCRIPTION, SIGN CONTENT AND QUANTITIES
FORMED SIGN OVERLAY PANELS (ALLOW INSTALLATION OVER BUTTON SYMBOL)
(ACTUAL SIGN SIZE IS 100" X 23', SEE ATTACHED PLANS)
SIGN
NO.
SIGN OVERLAY CONTENT* *
G A) "Rancho Calif. Rd." I
- over Rancho California
( B) "Old Town Front St."
Over Road
Rancho Calif. Rd. I
load Town Front St. I
A) "Rancho Calif. Rd." I I Rancho Calif. Rd. 1
over Rancbo California l[e]~ll z* .',,i :: a"t~ I[
"O d ?own From St." /
over Road
SIGN QUANTIFY
LOCATION (SQUARE FOOT)
Noahbound, south of
the Rancho California 37
off-ramo
Northbound, south of
the Rancho California 37
off-ramp
Noahbound, at Rancho
37
California off-ramp
Noahbound, at Rancho
California off-ramp
37
LETTER SIZES
& SPACING
Letter sizes:
Capital - 16"
Lower Case - 12"
Spacing: 10"
Letter sizes:
Capital - 16"
Lower Case - 12"
Spacing: 10"
** Overlay panels shall be 20" high and 22' wide
ROADSmE SIGN (AT OFF-RAMP TERMINI)
(ON TWO WOOD POSTS, PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLANS, JULY 1997 EDITION, RS1, RS2, AND RS3)
SIGN SIGN QUANTITY
NO. SIGN CONTENT AND DIMENSIONS LOCATION (SQUARE FOOT)
LETTER SIZES
& SPACING
Old Town Front St. I 2 1/2' Cryp.) Southbound, at Rancho
~ California off-ramp
19' Cryp.) Tennini
Old Town ~ront St. [ Southbound, at SR 79 47.5
" off-ramp Termini
Old To~wn Front St. California off-ramp 47.5
Termini
- off-ramp Termini
47.5
Letter sizes:
Capital - 13.3"
Lower Case = 10"
Spacing: 10"
8/24/99 Page 2 of 2
C) wJ
PROJECT NO. PW99-08
MANUFACTURING AND DELIVERY OF FREEWAY GUIDE SIGN PANELS AND FORMED
SIGN OVERLAY PANELS FOR USE ON 1-15 IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA
SCHEDULE OF PRICES
1TE~I ESTIMATED UNIT
DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL
NO. QUANTITY PRICE
Manufacture and Deliver Freeway Roadside SQUARE
1 Sign Panels, Posts and Hardware for Use 285
FOOT $75.16 $21,420.60
Adjacent to the 1-15 and at Ramps Termini
2 Manufacture and Deliver Freeway Sign 325
Panels
SQUARE
FOOT $27.00 $ 8,775.00
Manufacture and Deliver Formed Sign
3 Overlay Panels (formed to allow installation
over existing button syrnbols)
SQUARE
148 FOOT $17.37 $ 2,570.76
$32,766.36
TOT:~L PROPOS:LL LN FIGURES
Thirty two thousand seven hundred
sixty six dollars and thirty six cents.
TOTALPROPOSAL~ WORDS
Safeway Sign Company
9875 Yucca Road
Adelanto, CA 92301
CO~.~NY: (800) 637-7233
Mark Joh~on
DATE: 8/12/99
NOTES: 1. Item 1 includes twelve (12) each 200mm x
(8" x 8" x 18') laminated wood posts and
2. Laminated wood posts have a lead time of up to
_ 3. Item 2 includes type A-1 mounting hardware.
4. Item 3 includes rivets for panel installation.
5. Sales tax not included.
6. FOB destination.
200mm x 5.49m
mounting hardware.
4 months.
7. Net 30 days.
PROJECT NO. PW99-08
MANUFACTURING AND DELIVERY OF FREEWAY GUIDE SIGN PANELS AND FORMED
SIGN OVERLAY PANELS FOR USE ON 1-15 IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA
SCHEDULE OF PRICES
ITEM DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED UNIT UNIT TOTAL
NO. QUANTITY PRICE
Manufacture and Deliver Freeway Roadside
I Sign Panels, Posts and Hardware for Use 285
Adjacent to the 1-15 and at Ramps Termini
2 Manufacture and Deliver Freeway Sign 325
Panels
Manufacture and Deliver Formed Sign
3 Overlay Panels (formed to allow installation 148
over existing button symbols)
SQUARE
FOOT
SQUARE
FOOT
SQUARE
FOOT
¢ HAJ~mAr'~
TOTAL PROPOSAL IN WORDS
Sign. inc.
TRAFFIC SIGNS TRAFfiC CONTROL RELATED ITEMS INDUSTRIAL SIGNS
1928 W. 135TH · GARDENA, CA 90249-2452
1.800-447-SIGN 310-327-6261 FAX 310-327-9841
ITEM
22
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCI-
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City ManagedCity Council
>~,--.
Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager
September 14, 1999
Development Code Amendment (Planning Application PA99-0197)
PREPARED BY: David Hogan, Senior Planner
RECOM M ENDATION:
1. Approve the Negative Declaration for Planning Application PA99-0197.
2. Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, AMENDING THE SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF TITLE
17 TO RE-CATEGORIZE TEMPORARY USES, AMEND YARD
AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSORY
STRUCTURES IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES, CLARIFY FLOOR
AREA RATIO BONUS PROVISIONS, AND MAKE NUMEROUS
MINOR MODIFICATIONS TO TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE (PLANNING APPLICATION PA99-0197)
BACKGROUND: Staff periodically brings back development code amendments and
clarifications to the Planning Commission and City Council when the need for possible changes
has been identified. These proposed Development Code amendments represent a compilation
of a number of minor changes into a single staff report and ordinance.
The Planning Commission considered these changes at their August 18, 1999 meeting. At that
meeting, the Commission decided to not approve the Development Code clarifications relating
to the regulation of Large Family Day Care Home Facilities. The Commission stated that they
intend to reconsider the issue of regulating Large Family Day Care Home Facility regulations at
a later date. Consequently, those provisions have been removed from the draft Ordinance and
the Agenda Report. A copy of the Planning Commission Resolution, Staff Report, and Minutes
are contained in Attachments 2, 3 and 4, respectively.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1~Depts~PLANNING~STAFFRPT~197PA99 GC.doc
ANALYSIS: The proposed ordinance would amend the Development Code to address the
following:
The re-categodzation of temporary uses into major and minor categories;
A clarification of residential lot sizes and accessory structure setback
requirements;
Refine and update the senior and affordable housing provisions;
Cleanup the Commercial/Industrial Floor Area Ration Incentive provisions; and
Other minor clean up and typographic corrections,
Re-Classify Temporary Uses
After several years of processing applications for Temporary Use Permits, staff has determined
that not all applications need the same level of review. Consequently, staff is proposing that
temporary uses be divided into two categories, major and minor. The permits for the major
temporary uses would continue the process of multi-department review that they have always
received. Staff intends to use this amendment to create a situation where applications for minor
temporary uses would receive either a shortened review, or an over-the-counter approval.
The list of temporary uses shown in the draft ordinance is the same list of uses that is contained
in the current code. The list has just been divided into two categories. These changes are
contained in Section 1 of the Ordinance in Attachment No. 1.
Clarify Table 17.06.040 and Accessory Use Setbacks
The residential zoning chapter in the Code has a number of provisions that have caused
confusion in recent years. The provisions that are being recommended for modification include
the minimum lot sizes and accessory structure setbacks. These corrections are contained in
Section 2 of the Ordinance in Attachment No. 1.
Update the Senior and Affordable Housing Provisions
As the City's Affordable Housing Program begins to take on more diverse projects, staff has
identified a need to provide additional detail and to ensure that the City Development Code
complies with State Law. In the past, staff and members of the community have often had
difficulty determining the applicable requirements for each type of housing. The proposed
amendment further subdivides Section 17.06.050. H into a subsection on senior housing and
congregate care and another on affordable housing. Other changes mimic the provisions of
state law in terms of the density bonus incentives and the development standard concessions.
These corrections are contained in Sections 3 and 4 of the Ordinance in Attachment No. 1.
Floor Area Ration Provisions and the Other Minor Clean-up Items
Section 5 contains numerous clarifications, minor modifications, and typographic corrections
that staff has identified. The only potentially substantial issue is a minor clarification to the
Commercial Floor Area Ratio Incentive provisions. The proposed changes further clarify the
approval process and attempt to better define when and how the incentive can be approved.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Staff prepared an Initial Environmental Study for the proposed Development Code
amendments. The analysis indicated that the project would have not impact on the
environment. As a result, staff is recommending that a Negative Declaration be approved.
\\TEMEC_FS101 \VOL1 \Depts\P LANNING\STAFFRPT\I 97PA99 (2C.doc
FISCAL IMPACT:
There are no fiscal impacts associated with this proposal.
ATTACHMENT:
2.
3.
4.
5.
Draft Ordinance
Planning Commission Resolution
Planning Commission Minutes
Planning Commission Staff Report
Initial Environmental Study
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\Depts\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\197PA99 ~3C.doc
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
DRAFT ORDINANCE
\\TEMEC_FS101 \VOL1 ~Depts\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\197PA99 G~C.doc
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
ORDINANCE 99-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, AMENDING THE SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF TITLE
17 TO RE-CATEGORIZE TEMPORARY USES, AMEND YARD
AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSORY
STRUCTURES IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES, CLARIFY FLOOR
AREA RATIO BONUS PROVISIONS, AND MAKE NUMEROUS
MINOR MODIFICATIONS TO TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE (PLANNING APPLICATION PA99-0197)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 17.04.020.B of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended
to read as follows:
Permitted Uses. Temporary uses are divided into two general categories, minor
and major. Major temporary uses have a potential to create health and safety
problems, can occur on undeveloped property, could create traffic problems,
and/or could potentially disrupt community life. Minor temporary uses occur on
developed pdvate property, generally commercial, for very short time periods.
These temporary uses produce little noise, and have no impacts to adjacent
properties or to traffic and public safety.
Major Temporary Uses. The following major temporary uses may be
permitted, subject to the issuance of a temporary use permit.
Real estate offices and model homes within approved
development projects.
On- and off-site contractors' construction yards in conjunction with
an approved active development project.
Trailers, coaches or mobile homes as a temporary residence of
the property owner when a valid residential building permit is in
force. The permit may be granted for up to one hundred eighty
days, or upon expiration of the building permit, whichever first
OCCURS.
Christmas tree sales lots, however, a permit shall not be required
when such sale is in conjunction with an established commercial
business holding a valid business license, provided such activity
shall be only held from November I st through December 31 st.
Fairs, festivals and concerts, when not held
designed to accommodate such events, such
stadiums, or other public assembly facilities.
within premises
as auditoriums,
f. Pumpkin sales lots.
g. Seasonal sale of agricultural products.
\\TEMEC_FS101 \VOL1 ~Depts~PLANNING\STAFFRPT\197PA99 5C.doc
Outdoor temporary swap meets or auctions, limited to two events
per calendar year, not exceeding four consecutive days.
Minor Temporary Uses. The following minor temporary uses may be
permitted, subject to the issuance of a temporary use permit.
Outdoor display and sales of merchandise within commercial land
use districts, limited to two events per calendar year, not
exceeding four consecutive days, including only merchandise
customarily sold on the premises by a permanently established
business.
Public health and safety activities including emergency clinics and
temporary inoculation centers.
c. Sidewalk sale and vendor stands (non-mobile).
d. Flower sales (non-mobile).
e. Special lighting exhibits including spotlights.
Veterinary clinics on developed sites that are not in conjunction
with a veterinary facility (i.e., pet store, groomer).
For temporary uses that are not listed in Subsections B.1 and B.2, the
director of planning may, at his/her sole discretion, determine whether an
unlisted temporary use should be classified as major or minor. This
determination shall be based upon the similarities and differences with
the above listed uses and an assessment of the proposed temporary
use's compatibility with the zoning district and surrounding land uses."
SECTION 2. The following changes are hereby made to Chapter 17.06.
A. Section 17.06.050.D.3 is hereby amended to read as follows:
"Separation. Accessory structures shall maintain a minimum separation of at least three feet
from .all other structures unless attached to the main structure. Except that storage and utility
structures that are larger than 120 square feet shall not be located within six feet of another
structure. Eaves or roof overhangs may not extend more than I foot into this six foot area from
either direction."
B. Add the following lines to Table 17.06.050D:
Accessory Structure
Detached Second Unit 3
Detached Granny Flat s
Front Setback Rear Setback Side Setback
Not permitted in Refer to the rear Refer to the side
the actual front yard setbacks in yard setbacks in
yard. Table 17.06.040 Table 17.06.040
Not permitted in Refer to the rear Refer to the side
the actual front yard setbacks in yard setbacks in
yard. Table 17.06.040 Table 17.06.040
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1 \Depts\PLANNtNG\STAFFRPT\197PA99 eC.doc
C. In Table 17.06.050.D, add a footnote 2 to the Storage/Utility enclosure
accessory structure line description, and add the following text to the end of the table. "2.
Accessory structures with walls must be separated from other accessory and primary structures
by at least six feet."
D. To the end of Table 17.06.050D, add a Footnote 3 that reads as follows:
"Second units and granny flats that are attached to the main structure shall comply with the
setback and yard requirements contained in Table 17.06.040."
E. Amend Paragraph 17.06.050.M.3 to read as follows: "An attached
second unit on a residential lot shall have a floor area between four hundred and one thousand
two hundred square feet."
SECTION 3. Section 17.06.050. H is hereby amended to read as follows:
Senior Housing/Congregate Care Facilities/Affordable Housing. Senior housing,
congregate care facilities, and affordable housing projects are permitted in the
zoning districts identified below subject to the approval of a development plan.
Affordable senior housing projects shall comply with the affordable housing
provisions contained in Subsection 17.06.050.H.3.
Senior housing shall comply with all the provisions of the Development
Code unless modified by the following provisions:
a. The maximum densities for senior housing projects are as follows:
In the H residential zoning district, the maximum density
shall be thirty (30) units per acre.
ii.
In the M residential zoning district, the maximum density
shall be twenty (20) units per acre.
iii.
In the LM residential zoning district the maximum density
shall be eight (8) units per acre.
iv.
In all approved Specific Plans, the maximum density shall
not exceed 50% of the target density in the planning area.
The net livable area for each dwelling unit shall not be less than
four hundred (400) square feet for an efficiency unit, five hundred
fifty (550) square feet for a one-bedroom unit, and seven hundred
(700) square feet for a two-bedroom unit. Kitchenettes may be
permitted, provided they are sized to meet the immediate needs of
the occupants of the unit.
Congregate care projects shall comply with all the provisions of the
Development Code unless modified by the following provisions:
The maximum densities for congregate care facilities are not
limited specifically to density requirements so long as all the site
development standards are met (i.e. required setbacks, parking,
landscaping, open space, etc.)
\\TEMEC_FS101 \VOL1 \Depts\P LANNING\STAFFRPT\197PA99 (~C.doc
The handicapped units shall comply with the standards set forth in
Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations.
Affordable housing and affordable senior housing projects are entitled to
receive various incentives provided the project meets the requirements of
Section 65915 of the California Government Code. Affordable housing
projects will receive at least one incentive from Subsection
17.06.050.H.3.a and at least one concession from Subsection
17.06.050.H.3.b. The project incentives and concessions are as follows:
Density Incentives. Affordable housing projects are entitled to
receive an increase in the allowable density of at least 25% over
the density target in each residential zoning district. The
maximum densities for affordable housing projects are as follows:
In the H residential zoning district, the maximum density
shall be thirty (30) units per acre.
ii.
In the M residential zoning district, the maximum density
shall be eighteen (18) units per acre.
iii.
In the LM residential zoning district, the maximum density
shall be eight (8) units per acre.
iv.
In all approved Specific Plans, the maximum density bonus
shall not exceed 50% of the target density in the planning
area.
Development Standard Concessions. Any of the following
development standard concessions may be granted by the
approval authority for the project, unless a finding is made that
these concessions are not necessary to provide the affordable
housing units being proposed:
i. An increase in the amount of required lot coverage;
ii. A modification to the setback or required yard provisions;
iii. An increase in the maximum allowable building height;
iv. A reduction in the amount of required on-site parking;
A reduction in the amount of onsite landscaping, except
that no reduction in on-site recreational amenities may not
be approved unless the affordable housing is in a close
and easily accessible proximity to a public park with
recreational amenities;
vi. A reduction in the minimum lot area; or,
vii.
Approval of an affordable housing project in the
Professional Office zone with the approval of a conditional
use permit.
\\TEMEC_FS101 \VOL1 ~)epts\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\197PA99 eC.doc
The provisions of this Subsection also applies to all approved specific
plans within the City of Temecula unless the specific plan contains
specific standards for the type of housing being considered."
SECTION 4. The following provisions related to senior and congregate care housing are
also amend as described below:
A. Amend Footnote I of Table 17.06.040 to read as follows: "Affordable
housing and congregate care facilities may exceed the stated densities pursuant to the
provisions of Section 17.06.050. H ."
B. In Table 17.08.030, add a notation for Footnote 5 to the "Congregate cam
housing for the elderly" and "Senior citizen housing" uses in the Description of Use category and
add a Footnote 5 that reads as follows: "In the CC, SC, HT and PO Zones, all senior housing
residential projects shall use the development and performance standards for the High Density
Residential zone and the provisions contained in Section 17.06.050. H. In the NC Zone, all
senior housing residential projects shall use the development and performance standards for
the Medium Density Residential zone and the provisions contained in Section 17.06.050.H."
C. To Table 17.08.030, add the following line:
Description of Use ~ NC
Affordable housing e ~ _
PO ~BP ]LI ~
CC HT SC ~C - -
D. Add Footnote 6 to the end of Table 17.08.030: "6. Subject the provisions
contained in Subsection 17.06.050. H."
SECTION 5. The following provisions of the Temecula Municipal Code are also
amended as follows:
follows:
The first three lines of Table 17.06.040 are hereby amended to read as
Residential I I ]
Development Standards HR VL L-1 L-2 LM M H
LOT AREA
Minimum net lot area - 7,200 7,200 7,200
(square feet)
Minimum gross lot area 10 2.5 I Y=- - - -
(acres)
Maximum number of - - 12 20
1
dwelling units per acre
B. In Table 17.08.030, delete the phrase "less than 5,000 sq. ft." from
"Governmental offices" description of use.
\\TEMEC_FS 101 \VOL1 ~Depts\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\197PA99 eC.doc
C. Section 17.08.050.A is hereby amended to read as follows:
l'A ·
Commercial/Office/Industrial Incentives - Increases in the Floor Area Ratio. As a
part of the process of reviewing and approving an application for a development
plan or conditional use permit, the approval authority may consider an increase in
the maximum allowable intensity as indicated in Tables 17.08.040.A and B. The
amount of the increased intensity shall not exceed the maximum of the density
range or floor area ratio stated for the specific land use designation. The
requested increase may not be approved if the city engineer determines that the
increased intensity would create an unmitigatable impact upon traffic circulation
or would overburden any utilities serving the area. To be eligible for an increase
in the floor area ratio, the applicant must meet at least one of the following
criteria.
The project includes use(s) which provide outstanding and exceptional
benefits to the city with respect to the employment, fiscal, social and
economic needs of the community. Examples include: the provision of
affordable housing that is easily accessible to and within close proximity
to convenient shopping and employment, accessibility to mass transit
facilities, and creative mixtures of land uses, housing types and densities.
The project provides exceptional architectural and landscape design
amen,ties which reflect an attractive image and character for the city.
Examples include: extraordinary architectural design and landscaped
entry features (may be within the public right-of-way), public trail systems,
public plazas or gathering spaces, and recreational features in excess of
what is required by this code.
o
The project provides enhanced public facilities that are needed by the
city, beyond those required mitigation impact measures. Examples
include: the provision of community meeting centers, enhanced
transportation improvements, police or fire stations, public recreation
facilities, and common parking areas or structures to serve the
community."
D. Section 17.24.040.G is hereby amended to read as follows: "Facilities
with over twenty-five vehicle parking spaces shall provide a minimum of one motorcycle parking
space, plus one space for each additional twenty five required parking spaces. After the initial
one hundred (100) parking spaces, one additional motorcycle parking space for each additional
one hundred required spaces shall also be provided."
E. In Table 17.03.010, Conditional Use Permits - new building, less than
10,000 sq. ft or greater, delete the words "less than".
F. In Section 17.08.050.P.6, change the word "creams" to "creates".
G. In Section 17.16.070, incorporate the following specific plan references
adopted by Ordinance 98-13:"SP-9 Redhawk Specific Plan (Previous reference: SP #217)"
and "SP-10 Vail Ranch Specific Plan (Previous reference: SP #223)."
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLl%Depts\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\197PA99 e3D.doc
H. In Section 17.22.040, the second sentence is hereby amended to read as
follows: "When an application for a planned development overlay district is filed, the concurrent
preparation and approval of a development plan may be required by the director of planning to
ensure that all appropriate site development details and compatibility issues are addressed."
In the first sentence of 17.24,020.E, change the word "my" to "any".
J. In Section 17.24.050.A, after the words "within enclosed garages shall"
insert the words "have an interior dimension of at least".
K. In the title and first sentence of Section 17.24.050.1, change the words
"From" to "Front" and "from" to "front".
Modify the building size column in Table 17.24.060 to read as follows:
"10,000 or less
10,001 to 20,000
20,001 to 50,000
50,001 or greater"
"17.28.060".
In Section 17.28.040.Q, correct the code citation from "17.12.060" to
SECTION 6. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30)
days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause
copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places.
SECTION 8. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City
Councilmembers voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated
in said City.
SECTION 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall
cause the same to be posted as required by law.
\\TEMEC_FS101 \VOL1 \Depts\PLANNI NG',STAFFRPT\197PA99 CIC.doc
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of September, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Ordinance No. 99- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the 14th day of September, 1999 and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the
~th day of ,1999, by the following vote:
AYES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
\\TEMEC_FS101 \VOL1 \Depts\P LANNING\STAFFRPT\197PA99 C;D.doc
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
\\TEMEC_FS 101 \VOL1 \Depts\P LANNING\STAFFRPT\197PA99 CEC.doc
ATTACHMENT NO. I
PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-_.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING THE
SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF TITLE 17 TO RE-CATEGORIZE
TEMPORARY USES, AMEND YARD AND SETBACK
REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES IN
RESIDENTIAL ZONES, CLARIFY FLOOR AREA RATIO BONUS
PROVISIONS, AND MAKE NUMEROUS MINOR MODIFICATIONS
TO TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE (PLANNING
APPLICATION PA99-0197)"
WHEREAS, On November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the
General Plan; and
WHEREAS, On January 25, 1995, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the City's
Development Code; and
WHEREAS, the City has identified a need to amend the adopted Development Code; and
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, County Library, Rancho
California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and,
WHEREAS, a public headng was conducted on July 21, 1999, at which time interested persons
had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RECOMMENDS THAT THE COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING THE
SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF TITLE 17 TO RE-CATEGORIZE TEMPORARY USES, AMEND YARD
AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES,
CLARIFY FLOOR AREA RATIO BONUS PROVISIONS, AND MAKE NUMEROUS MINOR
MODIFICATIONS TO TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE (PLANNING
APPLICATION PA99-O197)" THAT IS SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM ATTACHED TO THIS
RESOLUTION AS EXHIBIT A.
R:\STAFFRPT\197PA99 PC.doc
4
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 18th day of August, 1999.
Ron Guerdero, Chairperson
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 18th day of August, 1999
by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R :~STAFFRPT~197PA99 PC .doc
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
AUGUST 18, 1999 STAFF REPORT
\\TEMEC_FS101 \VOLI ',Depts\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\197PA99 e~.doc
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
August 18, 1999
Planning Application No. PA99-0197
Prepared By: Dave Hogan, Senior Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff
recommends the Planning Commission:
ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Planning Application
No. PA99-0197; and,
ADOPT Resolution No. 99- recommending approval of
an ordinance entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING THE
SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF TITLE 17 TO ESTABLISH
DETAILED STANDARDS FOR LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE
HOME FACILITIES, RE-CATEGORIZE TEMPORARY
USES, AMEND YARD AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS
FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES IN RESIDENTIAL
ZONES, CLARIFY FLOOR AREA RATIO BONUS
PROVISIONS, AND MAKE NUMEROUS MINOR
MODIFICATIONS TO TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE (PLANNING APPLICATION PA99-0197).
BACKGROUND
Staff periodically brings back development code amendments and clarifications to the Planning
Commission and City Council when the need for possible changes has been identified. These
proposed Development Code amendments represent a compilation of a number of identified
changes into a single staff report and ordinance. The proposed ordinance would amend several
areas of the Development Code to address the following:
The processing and approval of small and large family day care home facilities;
The categorization of temporary uses;
The clarification of residential lot sizes and accessory structure setback
requirements;
The enhancement and updating of senior and affordable housing provisions; and
Other minor clean up and typographic corrections.
ANALYSIS
Lame Family Day Care Facilities
The City has recently received a number of inquiries for large family day care home facilities.
According to State Law, large day care homes can provide care for up to 14 children. After
R:\STAFFRPT~197PA99 PC.doc
1
reviewing the current code provisions, a number of corrections were proposed. The proposed
Development Code amendments would (1) differentiate between small and large family day care
home facilities, (2) provide a detail process about how the large facilities would .be reviewed and
approved (in accordance with State Law); and (3) will clarify who has the authority to approve the
application. These corrections are contained in Sections 1, 2 and 3 of the ordinance in Attachment
No. 2.
Re-Classify Temporary Uses
After several years of processing applications for Temporary Use Permits, staff has determined that
not all applications need the same level of review. Consequently, staff is proposing that temporary
uses be divided into two categories, major and minor. The permits for the major temporary uses
would continue to be processed much as they have been. The permits for minor temporary uses
would normally be approved either over-the-counter or, at most, a few days after the application
had been submitted. The list of temporary uses that is shown in the draft ordinance is the same
list of uses that is shown in the current code. These corrections are contained in Section 4 of the
ordinance in Attachment No. 2.
Clarify Table 17.06.040 and Accessory Use Setbacks
The residential zoning chapter in the Code has a number of provisions that seem to cause
confusion. As a result, staff has identified the following clarifications and modifications to the
Residential Development Standards table and the setback provisions for accessory structures and
second units. These corrections are contained in Section 5 of the ordinance in Attachment No. 2.
Update the Senior and Affordable Housinq Provisions
As the City's Affordable Housing Program begins to take on more diverse projects, staff has
identified a need to provide additional detail and to ensure that the City Development Code
complies with State Law. The proposed amendment further subdivides Section 17.06.050.H into
a subsection on senior housing and congregate care and another on affordable housing. Though
both areas relate to the need to provide appropriate housing to members of the community who
often have difficulty finding appropriate housing, the specific requirements that apply to each are
very different. The amendment also further mimics the provisions of state law in terms of the
density bonus incentives and the development standard concessions. These differences
necessitated the need to further clarify this section of the Development Code. T. hese corrections
are contained in Sections 6 and 7 of the ordinance in Attachment No. 2.
Other Minor Clean-up Items
Section 8 contains numerous clarifications, minor modifications, and typographic corrections that
staff has identified. The only issue of note is the cleanup of the provisions for commercial floor
area ratio incentives. The proposed changes further clarify the approval process and attempt to
better define when the incentive can be approved.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Staff prepared an Initial Environmental Study for the proposed Development Code amendments.
The analysis indicated that the project would have not impact on the environment. As a result,
staff is recommending that a Negative Declaration be approved.
R:\STAFFRP'R197PA99 PC.doc
Attachments:
PC Resolution No. 99- - Blue Page 4
Proposed Ordinance - Blue Page 7
Initial Study - Blue Page 8
R:\STAFFRPT~197PA99 PC.doc
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
\\TEMEC_FS101 \VOL1 \Depts\PLANNING\STAFFR PT\197PA99 C~,doc
PlanComm/minutes/081899
~'~~A~ RESOLUTION NO. PC 99-028
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
E CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNIN~
ICATION NO. PA98-0516 (TENTATIVE
MAP 29132), LOCATED ON THE SOU'
CC STATE HIGHWAY 79 AND )A DE
MISSIONS, KNOWN AS PARCEL
NO. 950-120-04
Modify-
The language of Co~
applicable.
to include the wording if
Add-
Th, Condition of Approval
//~g record by Assistant Planner Anders. (See the
e 5 of the minutes.) '
C missioner Webster seconded the motion and voice vote reflected
staff, and mad into
wording on
IOUS
Amendments to the Development Code (PlanninQ ADDlication No. PA97-
0197)
Request to amend the Development Code to do the following:
m
Establish standards for Large Family Day care Home Facilities;
Establish permitting requirements for the approval of Large Family
Day Care Home Facilities;
Re-categorizing temporary uses;
Amend accessory structure setback requirements;
Modify the senior housing, congregate care, and affordable housing
provisions;
Clarify parts of the floor area ratio incentive bonus; and,
Make numerous other minor changes to the Development Code.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning
Commission approve a resolution recommending adoption of an
ordinance.
Reviewing the proposed amendments in detail, Senior Planner Hogan presented the
staff report (via agenda material); for Commissioner Fahey, provided additional
clarification with respect to page 6, Section 2.b. regarding congregate care projects; for
Commissioner Webster, provided additional information regarding the cdteda for
increases in Floor Area Ratio (FAR), specifically with respect to page 8, Section 3; for
Commissioner Mathewson, relayed clarification regarding the language denoted on page
I~l~ PlanComnVminutes/081899
7, Section b; and for Commissioners Mathewson and Naggar, relayed that the Updated
Housing Element would address Low Income Housing parameters which would be
brought before the Commission potentially at the end of September.
Dudng the ensuing Commission discussion, the following revisions were presented:
Chairman Guerriero relayed that Item Nos. I and 2 of the proposals for
amendment would be pulled, and therefore would not be considered with
respect to this Agenda Item.
Regarding the unintentional omission on page 6, Section 1.a., after the
phrase The maximum density, Senior Planner Hogan indicated that the text
should reflect the same density incentives as denoted under senior housing.
Commissioner Fahey recommended that the language on page 6, Section
2.b. be modified, deleting the phrase distributed equally throughout the
project in order to solely reflect The handicapped units shall comply with the
standards set forth in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulation.
Deputy Director of Public Works Parks advised that staff concurred with
Commissioner Webster's recommendation (regarding the example denoted
on page 8, Section 3) to delete the phrase off-site signalization due to the
lack of need for provision of such specificity.
Commissioner Mathewson indicated that on page 6, Section 3.a.ii. the
numbers eighteen (20) should be corrected to reflect consistency.
Mr. Larry Markham, 41750 Winchester Road, recommended modifying page
8, Table 17.06.040 with respect to Sections HR, VL, and L-1 regarding the
standard designation to reflect minimum gross lot area in lieu of minimum net
lot area. Deputy Director of Public Works Parks advised that staff concurred
with the modification, and would additionally, include L-2.
With respect to Commissioner Mathewson's comments, and the
Commission's concurrence, Senior Planner Hogan relayed that on page 6,
Section 3.1.iii. L-1 and L-2 would be deleted, and the number of units per
acre would reflect eight (8) in lieu of the indicated twelve (12.)
For Commissioner Naggar, Attomey Cudey provided the definition of Affordable
Housing, which referenced the Health and Safety Code, and relayed that due to the
Commission's request he would provide additional specifications at a future point in time.
Deputy Director of Public Works Parks relayed that the Department of Redevelopment
may be able to provide the low-income housing parameters to the Commission.
For Commissioner Fahey, Planning Manager Ubnoske recommended that the
Commission move forward with Section Nos. 3-7 with respect to the proposals to amend
the Development Code, and then have staff bd~g back at a future point in time with the
proposed amendments to Section Nos. 1 and 2.
¢~1, PlanComrNminutes/081899
O~'~ In response to Commissioner Mathewson's querying with respect to the lack of specified
limits regarding Temporary Use Permits, Planning Manager Ubnoske provided additional
clarification as to the process that staff utilizes when issuing Temporary Use Permits.
For Mr. Anthony Maielta, 29747 Calle Palmas, Planning Manager Ubnoske provided
clarification with respect to the vadance between Medium and Low Medium Densities.
Chairman Guerdero closed the public hearing.
MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to approve the proposed amendments to
the Development Code with respect to Section Nos. 3-7, as modified in the previous
discussions (* all moved modifications are referenced in the minutes in detail, and
denoted as bulleted items on page 9.)
RESOLUTION NO. 99-29
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, AMENDING THE SEVERAL
CHAPTERS OF TITLE 17 TO ESTABLISH DETAILED
STANDARDS FOR LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE HOME
FACILITIES, RE-CATEGORIZE TEMPORARY USES,
AMEND YARD AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES,
CLARIFY FLOOR AREA RATIO BONUS PROVISIONS,
AND MAKE NUMEROUS MINOR MODIFICATIONS TO
TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
(PLANNING APPLICATION PA99-0197)"
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Fahey and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
10
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
\\TEMEC_FS101 \VOL1 ~Depts\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\197PA99 Gl~.doc
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Environmental Checklist
Project Title
Development Code Amendment (PA99-0197)
Lead Agency Name and Address
Contact Person and Phone Number
Project Location
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033,
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
David Hogan, Senior Planner
(909) 694-6400
Citywide
Project Sponsors Name and Address City of Temecula
General Plan Designation
Not applicable
Zoning Not applicable
Description of Project
A comprehensive amendment to the Development Code to do the
following:
1. The processing and approval of small and large family
day care home facilities;
2. The further categodzation of temporary uses to facilitate
permit streamlining;
3. The clarification of residential lot sizes and accessory
structure setback requirements;
4. The enhancement and updating of senior and affordable
housing provisions;
5. The modification of the commercial floor area ratio
increase incentive; and
6. Other minor dean up and typographic corrections.
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting Not applicable
Other public agencies whose approval
is required
None.
R:\CEQA\197PA99 IES ,doc
1
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one
impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Land Use Planning
Population and Housing
Geologic Problems
Water
Air Quality
Transportation/Circulation
Biological Resources
Energy and Mineral Resources
Hazards
Noise
Public Services
Utilities and Service Systems
Aesthetics
Cultural Resources
Recreation
Mandatory Findings of Significance
None
Determination
(To be completed by the lead agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on the environment, and a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by
the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant
unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1 ) has been adequately analyzed in
an eadier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the eadier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially
significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an eadier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
that eadier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
Signature
Date
Printed name
For
R:\CEQA\197PA99 IES.doc
2
1. Land Use and Planning. Would the project:
· Issues and $uppodjnfi Information Sources
a. Physically divide an established community?.
b. Conflict with applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the general plan, specific
plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance)
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigation an
environmental effect?.
c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or
natural community conservation plan?
Potentially ·
Polenlially Significant Unless Less Than
Signif'taunt Mitigation Significant
Impad Incorporated Impacl
,/
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
Issues and Suppoding InfoeTnation Sources
a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension
of roads or other infrastructure)?
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless t. ess Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incorporated Impact
No
Impact
3. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project?
Issues and Suppoding InfoeTnalion Sources
a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the dsk of loss, injury, or death
involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on
the most recent Alquist-Pdolo Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the
area or based on other substantial evidence of a
known fault?. Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?
iv) Landslides?
b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
Potentially
Potenlially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mltigalion Significant
Impacl Incofporaled Impact
No
,/
,/
V'
,/
R:\CEQA\197PA99 IES .doc
3
Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or
that would become unstable as a result of the project,
and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, laterel
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 1801-B
of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial
dsks to life or property?.
Have soil incapable of adequately supporting the use of
septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste
water?.
4. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
a,
f,
h,
· Issues and Suppoding !dotmarion Sources
Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements?
Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a Iowedng of
the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate
of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which
would not support existing land uses or planned uses for
which permits have been granted)?
Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or dyer, in a manner which would result in
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or dyer, or substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result
in flooding on- or off-site?
Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage
systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?.
Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
Place housing within a l O0-year flood hazard area as
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation
map?
Place within a lO0-year flood hazard area structures
which would impede or redirect flood flows?
Expose people or structures to a significant dsk of loss,
injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a
result of the failure of a levee or dam?
Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?.
Potenlially
Signi~canl
Impact
Potentially
;$ignilicanl Unlesa
Mitigation
lncorporaled
Less Than
Signirmaot
~mpact
No
R:\CEQA\197PA99 IES.doc
4
a,
AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable quality
management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following
determinations. Would the project:
lesuer, end Suppoding Information Source~
Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable
air quality plan?
Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially
to an existing or projected air quality violation?
Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any
criteda pollutant for which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient
air quality standard (including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors?
Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number
of people?
Polenlially
Polenlially Significant Unless Leel Then
Significard Mitigalioft Signr~c, anl
Impact Irtcorporated Impact
Impact
6. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project:
C,
Issues and Suppoffing lri3~nalion Source
Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in
either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity
ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections?
Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of
service standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or highways?
Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either
an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that
results in substantial safety dsks?
Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
Result in inadequate emergency access?
Result in inadequate parking capacity?.
Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks?
Polenlially
Polenlially Significant Unless L_~-~__ Than
Significant Mitigalion Signilk:ant
Impact Incorporated Impad
R:\CEQA\197PA99 IES .doc
5
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project:
ae
b,
d,
· bn.,..d sup~ee.; bem=tb,,
Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species identified
as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in
local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
Califomia Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
Have a substantial adverse effect on any dpadan habitat
or other sensitive natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, regulations or by the Califomia
Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife
Service?
Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vemal pool,
coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filing, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
Interfere substantially with the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors,
or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
Poleflljally
Polenlially Significant Unlem Lem~ Than
Significant Mitigation Signillcanl
Impact 1ff3orparated Irapad ·
Impact
8. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
be
kstm~ and 8ulppodbg Infe'melion Sources
Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
Polentially
Polentially Significant Unless Leas Than
Significant Mitigation Signrant
Impact Irtcorporated Impact
R:\CEQA\197PA99 IES.doC
6
9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project:
b,
e,
ge
Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transportation, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
Crate a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-
quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Govemment Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles or a public airport or public use airport, would the
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
For a project within the vicinity of a pdvate airstrip, would
the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
Expose people or structures to a significant dsk or loss,
injury or death involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are intermixed with wildlands?
Pntentially
SignfficaN
Impad
Significant Unlee~
Mitigation
Incorporated
signmeaN
Impact
,/
,/
10. NOISE. Would the project result in:
bt
__k~_,__,~_ 'a~d Supporting ~rmmio. SourCes
Exposure of people to severe noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels
in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
Potentially
Signirmant
Impad
Polentially
Significanl Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Le~ Than
Signif. ant
Impact
Impact
,f
R:\C EQA\197PA99 IES .doc
7
e,
fe
A substantial temporary or pedodic increase in ambient
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?.
For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project expose people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?
For a project within the vicinity of a pdvate airstrip, would
the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
11. PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altered Government services in any of the following areas:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Would the project result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associates with the provisions of new or
physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the construction
of which could cause significant environmental impacts,
in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response
times or other performance objectives for any of the
public services?
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less__ Than
Signi~canl Mitigation Signrant
Impoct b'"~corpomled Impact
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project:
C,
· Issues end Suppoffing In{otmalion Sources
Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
Require or result in the construction of new storm water
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project from existing entitlements and resources, or are
new or expanded entitlements needed?
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation SignifP,,anl
Impad Incorporated Impad
Impacl
R:\CEQA\197PA99 IES.dOC
8
e,
Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
13.
AESTHETICS. Would the project:
Issues end Supporting Information Sources
Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not
limited to, trees, rock outcropping, and histodc building
within a state scenic highway?.
Substantially degrade the existing visual character or
quality of the site and its surroundings?
Create a new source of substantial light or glare which
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
Polentially
Significant
Impact
Polenlially
Significant Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Soume.
Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
a historical resource as defined in Section 1506.5?
Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 1506.57
Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries?
Pctentially
Significam
Impact
Polentially
Significant Unleil
Mitjgalion
Less Than
Signifmant
Impact
,/
15. RECREATION. Would the project:
Issues end Suppoding Infonnation Sources
Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
Does the project include recreational facilities or require
the construction or expansion of recreational facilities
which might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Signifr, ant
Impact
No
Impact
R:\CEQA\197PA99 IES .doc
9
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
Pole~tially
Polentially ,Signir~,ant Unle~ Le~ Than
Significant Mitigate SignIN
Impad Incorporated Impad
bsues and Suppoding Inleenmtion Sources
Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife spedes, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below serf-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce the number of
restdct the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or eliminate important examples of the major pedods of
California history or prehistory?.
b. Does the project have impacts that are individually ,/
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable future projects?
c. Does the project have environmental effects which will ,/
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Impad
Comments:
The proposed amendment to the Development Code that proposes to amend a number of relatively minor
provisions concerning in-home day care facilities, temporary land uses permits, lot size and required yard
requirements, and senior and affordable housing performance standards. The modification of these provisions
will not impact or noticeably effect any of the previously described environmental resources. The proposed
changes continue to be consistent with the general impacts and discussed in the adopted General Plan and
Final EIR. As a result, no adverse impacts have been identified and no mitigation measures are necessary.
R:\CEQA\197PA99 IES .doc
10
ITEM 23
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FRO M:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Gary Thomhill, Deputy City Manager,F~--;~''
September 14, 1999
General Plan Land Use Amendment #3
(Planning Application PA99-0291 )
PREPARED BY: David Hogan, Senior Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Approve the Negative Declaration for Planning Application PA99-0291.
2. Approve a Resolution entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
MAP FOR VARIOUS AREAS THROUGHOUT THE CITY
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 921-660-026, 921-
660-027, 921-660-041, AND 921-660-042 (PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA99-0291)
3. Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA FOR THE AREAS KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NOS. 921-660-026, 921-660-027, 921-660-041, 921-
660-042, AND 950-120-004 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA99-0291 )
BACKGROUND: Staff has recently identified a number of needed adjustments that should be
made to the General Plan Land Use and Zoning Maps. These city-initiated changes have been
grouped together to simplify the headng process before the Planning Commission and City
Council. Though bundled together for processing, each of the changes may be discussed and
considered separately if the Council deems it appropriate.
F:~epts~PLANNING~STAFFRP'I'~291 PA99 CCI.doc 1
These General Plan Land Use and Zoning Maps changes were considered by the Planning
Commission on August 18, 1999. Site 2 was not recommended for approval by the Planning
Commission and is not being presented to the Council for their consideration. Only General
Plan Amendment/Zone Change Sites 1 and 3 are being proposed at this time.
The proposed changes are as follows:
Site 1: South side of Via La Vida
General Plan: 6 +/- acres Medium Density Residential to Low Medium Density
Zoning: 6 +/- acres Medium Density Residential to Low Medium Density
This area consists of approximately six acres of vacant property that is surrounded by
single family residences. The homes to the west and north are smaller homes on 4,000
square foot lots. The homes to the east and south are larger homes on 8,000 to 14,000
square foot lots. The proposal would change the General Plan and Zoning designations to
allow approximately 28 single-family homes to be constructed on 7,200 +/- square foot
lots. The proposed change would facilitate development that would create a transition
between the smaller and larger homes.
Site 2: Rancho Hi.clhlands Drive
This proposed General Plan Amendment and clarification of the Rancho Highlands Specific
Plan was not approved by the Planning Commission because of concerns that it might
represent a major change to the approved Specific Plan. This amendment has not been
included for the Council's consideration.
Site 3: West side of Avenida de Missiones
Zoning:
2 +/- acres Open Space-Conservation to Professional Office
The purpose of this amendment is to clarify a mapping error west of Avenida de Missiones.
During the adoption of the Zoning Map, the southern portion of this 7.2 acres site was
inadvertently included in the Temecula Creek channel open space area. Subsequent
communications with the Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
indicate that this area is not considered to be part of Temecula Creek's channel because it is
located behind the existing creek channel improvements. Consequently, staff is recommending
that the Zoning designations on the southern third of this site be changed to Professional Office
to be consistent with the General Plan. Copies of the above mentioned communications are
included in Attachment No. 4.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
An Initial Environmental Study was prepared for this project to determine if the proposed
changes would result in any environmental impacts beyond those impacts identified in the Final
Environmental Impact Report for the City General Plan. The Initial Study indicated that overall,
the proposed General Plan Amendments and Zone Changes would not result in impacts beyond
those originally anticipated for the City General Plan. These amendments will result in a very
slight increase, less than one thousand, in daily vehicle trips. However, overall the impacts of
these General Plan changes will not have an impact beyond those anticipated in the certified
Final Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan. As a result, these potential increases
are not considered significant and staff recommends that a Negative Declaration be adopted.
\\TEMEC_FS101 \VOL1 ~)epts~PLANNING\STAFFRPT~I PA99 (2CI.doc
FINDINGS
General Plan Amendment
1. The amendments are compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the
community.
The amendments are compatible with existing and surrounding uses.
The amendments will not have an adverse effect on the community and are consistent
with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan.
Chan.ae of Zone
1. The changes am compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
2. The changes are consistent with the approved revisions to the General Plan Land Use
Map.
3. The changes will not have an adverse effect on the community and are consistent with
the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The proposal will have no fiscal impacts.
ATTACHMENT:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Draft Resolution
Draft Ordinance
Planning Commission Resolution
Planning Commission Staff Report and Exhibits
Draft Planning Commission Minutes
Initial Environmental Study
\\TEMEC_FS101 \VOL1 ~)epts~PLANNING~STAFFRPT~291PA99 OCI,doc
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
DRAFT RESOLUTION
\\TEMEC_FS101 \VOL1 ~Depts~PLANNING~STAFFRPT'~,91PA99 ~CI.doc
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
MAP FOR VARIOUS AREAS THROUGHOUT THE CITY
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 921-660-026, 921-
660-027, 921-660-041, AND 921-660-042 (PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA99-0291)
WHEREAS, The City of Temecula initiated Planning Application No. PA99-0291, in
accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA99-0291 was processed including, but not
limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, Temecula
Library, Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA99-0291
on August 18, 1999, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City
staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition
to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of
the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of Planning Application No. PA99-0291;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to Planning
Application No. PA99-0291 on September 14, 1999, at which time interested persons had
opportunity to, and did testify either in support or in opposition to Planning Application No.
PA99-0291;
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff
Report regarding Planning Application No. PA99-0291;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated
by reference.
Section 2. Findings The City Council, in approving Planning Application No. PA99-
0291 (General Plan Amendment) hereby makes the following findings:
A. These amendments are compatible with the health, safety and
welfare of the community.
B. These amendments are compatible with existing and surrounding uses.
C. These amendments will not have an adverse effect on the community
and are consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan.
F:gepts~PLANNING\STAFFRP~I PA99 CCI.doc 5
Section 3. Amendments To The General Plan Land Use Map The City Council hereby
amends the General Plan Land Use Map for the parcels identified as APNs 921-660-026, 921-
660-027, 921-660-041, and 921-660-042; change the Land Use Designation from Medium
Density Residential to Low Medium Residential.
Section 4. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Environmental Study was prepared for
this project to determine if the proposed changes would result in any environmental impacts
beyond those impacts identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City General
Plan. The Initial Study indicated that overall, the proposed General Plan Amendment would
have not result in impacts beyond those originally anticipated for the City General Plan. The
exceptions are that three areas; circulation, air quality, and biologic resource impacts are
expected to see small reductions in the anticipated environmental impacts. As a result, the City
Council determines that the potential impacts of these changes were adequately addressed by
the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City General Plan and that no further
environmental analysis is required.
Section 5. Severability The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Resolution are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Resolution to be invalid, such decision shall not affect
the validity of the remaining parts of this Resolution.
Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
Section 7. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City
of Temecula this 14th day of September, 1999.
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
[SEAL]
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council
of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 14th day of September, 1999
by the following vote of the Council:
AYES:
CITY COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
CITY COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: CITY COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1~)epts~PLANNING~STAFFRPTL~91PA99 6CI.doc
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
DRAFT ORDINANCE
\\TEMEC_FS101 \VOL1%Depts%P LANNING%STAFFRPT~291PA99 (ZCI.doc
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA FOR THE AREAS KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NOS. 921-660-026, 921-660-027, 921-660-041, 921-
660-042, AND 950-120-004 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA99-0291 )
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Public headngs have been held before the Planning Commission and City
Council of the City of Temecula, State of California, pursuant to the Planning and Zoning law of
the State of Califomia, and the City Code of the City of Temecula. The following changes to
the land use distdct shown on the Official Land Use map for the City of Temecula are hereby
adopted.
A. The zoning designation for the parcels identified as Assessors Parcel
Nos. 921-660-026, 921-660-027, 921-660-041, and 921-660-042 are changed the Medium
Density Residential (M) to Low Medium Residential (LM); and
B. The zoning designation for the parcel identified as Assessors Parcel No.
950-120-004 is changed from Open Space-Conservation (OS-C) to Professional Office (PO).
Section 2. Notice of Adoption. Within 10 days after the adoption hereof, the City Clerk
of the City of Temecula shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be posted
in at least three public places in the City.
Section 3. Taking Effect. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its
adoption.
Section 4. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Environmental Study was prepared
for this project to determine if the proposed changes would result in any environmental impacts
beyond those impacts identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City General
Plan. The Initial Study indicated that overall, the proposed General Plan Amendments and
Zone Changes would have not result in impacts beyond those originally anticipated for the City
General Plan. The exceptions are that three areas; circulation, air quality, and biologic resource
impacts are expected to see small reductions in the anticipated environmental impacts. As a
result, the City Council determines that the potential impacts of these changes were adequately
addressed by the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City General Plan and that no
further environmental analysis is required.
Section 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall
publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall
be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance.
Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this
Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the
Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
\\TEMEC_FSI 01 \VOLI ~Depts~PLANNING~STAFFRP~I PA99 eCI.doc
Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 14th day of September 14, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance No. was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the 14t" day of September 14, 1999, and that thereafter,
said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the __ day of ,1999 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1~Depts~PLANNING~STAFFRP~1PA99 eCI.doc
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
\\TEMEC_FS 101 \VOL1 ~Depts~PLANNING%STAFFRPT~31PA99 ~B;:l.doc
ATTACHMENT NO. I
DRAFT
PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-006
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVE A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR VARIOUS AREAS
THROUGHOUT THE CITY KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NOS. 921-660-026, 921-660-027, 921-660-041, AND 921-660-042
(PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0291)" AND ADOPT AN
ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR THE AREAS KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 921~660-026, 921-660-027, 921-660-
041, 921-660-042, AND 950-120-004 (PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA99-0291))"
WHEREAS, The City of Temecula initiated Planning Application No. PA99-0291, in accordance
with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA99-0291 was processed including, but not limited to
public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, Temecula Ubrary, Pujol
Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA99-0291 on
August 18, 1999, at a duly noticed public headng as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in suppod or opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission recommended approval of Planning Application No. PA99-0291;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. Findin.qs.
A. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of these General Plan
Amendments, make the following findings:
community.
1. The amendments are compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the
2. The amendments are compatible with existing and surrounding uses.
3. The amendments will not have an adverse effect on the community and are
consistent with the goals and polldes of the adopted General Plan.
F:~Depts~PLANNING~STAFFRP~I PA99 - PC.doc
6
DRAFT
B. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of these Changes of Zone, make
the following findings:
community.
1. The changes are compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the
e
Land Use Map.
The changes are consistent with the approved revisions to the General Plan
3. The changes will not have an adverse effect on the community and are
consistent with the goals and polides of the adopted General Plan
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Environmental Study was prepared for this
project to determine if the proposed changes would result in any environmental impacts beyond those
impacts identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City General Plan. The Initial Study
indicated that overall, the proposed General Plan Amendments and Zone Changes would have not result
in impacts beyond those originally antidpated for the City General Plan. The exceptions are that three
areas; drculation, air quality, and biologic resource impacts are expected to see small reductions in the
anticipated environmental impacts. As a result, the Planning Commission determines that the potential
impacts of these changes were adequately addressed by the Final Environmental Impact Report for the
City General Plan and that no further environmental analysis is required.
Section 4. The City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of
Planning Application No. PAgcJ-0291 (General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone) and recommends
that the City Council do the following:
A. Approve a Resolution entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR VARIOUS AREAS
THROUGHOUT THE CITY KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 921-660-026, 921-660-027,
921-660-041, AND 921-660-042 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0291)" substantially in the form
that is attached to this resolution as Exhibit A; and,
B. Adopt an Ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR THE AREAS
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 921-660-026, 921~660-027, 921-660-041,921-660-042, AND
950-120-004 (PLANNING APPUCATION NO. PA99-0291)" substantially in the form that is attached to
this resolution as Exhibit B.
F:gepts~DLANNING~STAFFRP'r~31PA99 - PC.doc
7
DRAFT
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 18th day of August 1999.
Ron Guerriero, Chairperson
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 18th day of August, 1999
by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
F:~)epts~PLANNING~STAFFRP'['~291PA99 - PC,doc
8
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
AUGUST 18, 1999 STAFF REPORT AND EXHIBITS
\\TEMEC_FS101 \VOL1%Depts~DLANNING\STAFFRPT~-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-~31 PA99 C3:;I.doc
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
August 18, 1999
Planning Application No. PA99-0291
(General Plan Amendment and Zone Change)
Prepared By: David Hogan, Senior Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning
Commission:
APPROVE a Negative Declaration for Planning Application
PA99-0291; and,
o
ADOPT Resolution No. 99- recommending approval of
Planning Application No. PA99-0291 based upon the
Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
City of Temecula
PROPOSAL/LOCATION:
To amend the General Plan Land Use and the Zoning Maps
for the City of Temecula for a site identified as Assessors
Parcel Numbers 921-660-026, -027, -041, -042 located south
of Via La Vida between Calle Palmas and Via Sevilla from
Medium Density Residential to Low Medium Density
Residential.
o
To amend the General Plan Land Use Map for the City of
Temecula for a site identified as Assessors Parcel Number
944-330-019 located between Rancho Highlands Drive and
Interstate 15 from Open Space to Highway Tourist
Commercial.
To amend the General Plan Land Use and the Zoning Maps
for the City of Temecula for the southerly third of a site
identified as Assessors Parcel Number 950-120-004 located
west of Avenida de Missiones from Open Space-
Conservation to Professional Office.
PROJECT STATISTICS
Total Area:
9.4 +/~ acres
\\TEMEC FS101 \VOL1 \DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\291PA99 - PC.doc
1
BACKGROUND
Staff has recently identified a number of needed adjustments that should be made to the General
Plan Land Use and Zoning Maps. These city-initiated changes have been grouped together to
simplify the hearing process before the Planning Commission and City Council. Though bundled
together for processing, each of the three changes may be discussed and considered separately
if the Commission deems it appropriate.
ANALYSIS
These proposals would change the General Plan Land Use map and Zoning Maps in several areas
of the City. A detailed discussion of each change area follows.
Site 1: South side of Via La Vida
General Plan: 6 +/- acres Medium Density Residential to Low Medium Density
Zoning: 6 +/- acres Medium Density Residential to Low Medium Density
This area consists of approximately six acres of vacant property that is surrounded by single family
residences. The homes to the west and north are smaller homes on 4,000 square foot lots. The
homes to the east and south are larger homes on 8,000 to 14,000 square foot lots. The proposal
would change the General Plan and Zoning designations to allow approximately 28 single family
homes to be constructed on 7,200 +/- square foot lots. The proposed change would facilitate
development that would create a transition between the smaller and larger hordes.
Site 2: Rancho Highlands Drive
General Plan: 1.4 +/- acres Open Space to Highway Tourist Commercial
The purpose of this amendment is to clarify a mapping discontinuity between the Rancho Highlands
Specific Plan and the General Plan Land Use Map. The Land Use Map in the Rancho Highlands
Specific Plan shows open space over much of this property. This open space actually appears to
represent landscaped slopes that were supposed to form a transition between Planning Area 2
(commercial) and Planning Area 6 (high density residential and commercial). This is supported
by Riverside County's approval of Parcel Map 23624 in 1989. At that time, the entire larger parcel
was subdivided into three commercial sites without any reference to open space. The other two
parcels of this map are developed and are occupied by Marie Calendars Restaurant and the
Embassy Suites Hotel. This proposal would allow the commercial development envisioned in the
specific plan and parcel map to occur. The zoning standards for this site are still contained in the
Rancho Highlands Specific Plan.
Site 3: West side of Avenida de Missiones
General Plan: 2 +/- acres Open Space to Office Professional
Zoning: 2 +/- acres Open Space-Conservation to Professional Office
The purpose of this amendment is to clarify a mapping error west of Avenida de Missiones. During
the adoption of the General Plan, the southern portion of this 7.2 acres site was inadvertently
included in the Temecula Creek channel open space area. Subsequent communications with the
Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service indicate that this area is not
considered to be part of Temecula Creek's channel because it is located behind the existing creek
\\TEMEC FS101 \VOL1 \DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\291PA99 - PC.doc 2
channel improvements. Consequently, staff is recommending that the General Plan and Zoning
designations on the southern third of this site be changed to Professional Office, Copies of the
above mentioned communications are included in Attachment No. 4.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
An Initial Environmental Study was prepared for this project to determine if the proposed changes
would result in any environmental impacts beyond those impacts identified in the Final
Environmental Impact Report for the City General Plan. The Initial Study indicated that overall, the
proposed General Plan Amendments and Zone Changes would not result in impacts beyond those
originally anticipated for the City General Plan. These amendments will result in a very slight
increase, less than one thousand, in daily vehicle trips. However, overall the impacts of these
General Plan changes will not have an impact beyond those anticipated in the certified Final
Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan. As a result, these potential increases are not
considered significant and staff recommends that a Negative Declaration be adopted.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
Staff has evaluated these proposals and has determined that these amendments to the General
Plan Land Use and Zoning Maps are appropriate and will be compatible with the other land uses
in their respective areas and recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of
these changes to the City Council.
FINDINGS
General Plan Amendment
1. The amendments are compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
2. The amendments are compatible with existing and surrounding uses.
The amendments will not have an adverse effect on the community and are consistent with
the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan,
Change of Zone
1. The changes are compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
2. The changes are consistent with the approved revisions to the General Plan Land Use Map.
o
The changes will not have an adverse effect on the community and are consistent with the
goals and policies of the adopted General Plan.
\\TEMEC FS 101 \VOL 1 \DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\291 PA99 - PC.doc
3
Attachments:
PC Resolution No. 99- - Blue Page 5
Exhibit A - Resolution No. 99- - Blue Page 9
Exhibit B - Ordinance No. 99- - Blue Page 13
Initial Study - Blue Page 16
Exhibits o Blue Page 17
A. Location Map
B-1 Site 1 Existing General Plan Map
C-1 Site 1 Existing Zoning Map
B-2 Site 2 Existing General Plan Map
C-2 Site 2 Existing Zoning Map
B-3 Site 3 Existing General Plan Map
C-3 Site 3 Existing Zoning Map
D-1 Site 1 Proposed General Plan Land Use and Zoning Map
D-2 Site 2 Proposed General Plan Land Use Map
D-3 Site 3 Proposed General Plan Land Use and Zoning Map
Correspondence on Site 3 - Blue Page 28
\\TEMEC FS 101 \VOL1 \DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\291PA99 - PC.doc
4
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NUMBER: PA99-0291
EXHIBIT- A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - AUGUST 18, 1999
LOCATION MAP
GENERAL PLAN
( PA99 - 0291 )
CITY OF TEMECULA
OS
CC
M
.M
iO~..\
EXHIBIT B-1 - GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
DESIGNATION - MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (M)
CASE NUMBER: PA99-0291
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE -AUGUST 18, 1999
SITE 1
CITY OF TEMECULA
· U
EXHIBIT B-3 - GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION - OPEN SPACE (OS)
CASE NUMBER: PA99-0291
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- AUGUST 18, 1999
SITE 3
CITY OF TEMECULA
,C,<>
.-': :: ". .....:"~-".~r'~: '~i".~:':..'.:::"='-<.:' '~..
"'.IH,, i.;".:.:: 'i:.?;.:"'.. ~:::-~'::::. ~-.:"!: '..'-' ~'~'' ::::'.
~ ,~ ....:, .,.. ~.,..: :,:: ......... ~":' 'S."' ':""
[] ~~,~4~' f ''~" '':'':p "' i, · . ': :.~ ....... ':rl~::.
i:.:': ,;' .. "'~..~. ~' .:: ~i.:.';" .'.'.h.h=..-'m "'
;.,"~ . :.~'~. :~ ~::h..% -'.'.":"'..' ..: .:. ':.;.'_'.. F-.,.:
q '..:;;:, =;~;,~ ~:=:: ~:.. ~ ~.~.'-,~- ~ ~' ,:::;,~:::::;
· .e..:~.. ...~,, ,.,, ...,.: .:: ..:: ...:..e ......
. 'ii.., ."::~:.~i~ ~:: '. ::.: ':..~ :~:':''~':! ............
~'~ , ====================================-.
~f,~,~&l~' SITE 1
1~"' i'l"~
. !
,~4~,~< -....-...........-.........--..................
-'-','.'.".'-'-'.'-'.".'.'.'-'-'- t
EXHIBIT C-1 - ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (M)
CASE NUMBER: PA99-0291
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- AUGUST 18, 1999
SITE 1
CITY OF TEMECULA
EXHIBIT C-3 - ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - OPEN SPACE-CONSERVATION (OS-C))
CASE NUMBER: PA99-0291
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- AUGUST 18, 1999
SITE 3
CITY OF TEMECULA
GP: Low Medium Residential:
ING: Low Medium Residential~
CASE NUMBER: PA99-0291
EXHIBIT D-1
SITE 1 - PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE -AUGUST 18, 1999
CITY OF TEMECULA
\ZONING.'
Professional
Professional Office
CASE NUMBER: PA99-0291
EXHIBIT D-3 SITE 3 - PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE -AUGUST 18, 1999
'~ OM DODSON & ASSOCIATES
2150 N. ARROWHEAD AVENUE
SAN BERNAR. D1NO, CA 92405
TEL (909) 882-3612 · FAX (909) 882-7015
E-MAIL tda~empirenet.com
March 31,1999
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Branch
A'FFN: Spencer McNeil
911 Wilshire Boulevard, 11th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
. By
Subject:
Follow-up to site visit on small parcel (Ray Schooley property) on
the corner of State Highway 79 and Avenida De Missions in
Temecula, Riverside County, California
Dear Spencer:
This letter is a follow-up to your site visit to the subject property with Ms. Lisa
Kegarice on March 16, 1999 on the parcel adjacent to the Presley
Development, located across Avenida De Missions in Temecula (Ray Schooley
property, see the attached map and aerial photo). Lisa is overwhelmed by
Quino surveys at this moment, so she asked me to transmit this letter to you
in response to your request for additional information. As you may recall, this
site has been isolated from the active channel of Temecula Creek by a large
channel wall or levee (see aerial) installed by Presley during the construction
of their residential tract across (to the east) of the subject site. In the field
Lisa indicated that the isolation of this parcel from Temecula Creek's flows has
rendered this parcel no longer subject to 404 jurisdiction.
Subsequent to your and Lisa's visit to the site, you confirmed that the berm
had been permitted by the Corps and the subject parcel was legally isolated
by the channel wall. However, you then questioned whether or not the
southern portion of the parcel had been included in a County open space or
mitigation easement for the Presley pro.~ect. We have obtained the City maps
and have determined that the parcel was not encumbered in any manner by
the Conservation Easement. The attached map and aerial photo illustrates the
various features (roads, channel wall, conservation easement area and Mr.
Schooley's property) which verify that the conservation easement extends to
the westerly boundary of Mr. Schooley's property and does not encompass any
of his property.
Based on the attached information and your discussions with Lisa on this
matter, we are requesting your concurrence that this parcel is not subject to
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and that no further procedural interaction
with the Corps under Section 404 is required for future development of this
site. Should you be to busy to respond to this transmittal, we will proceed
under the assumption that, if we do not hear from you by April :~5, :L999
regarding this matter, you do concur with these conclusions.
]: want to thank you for your timely help in this matter. ]:f you have any
questions regarding the contents of this letter or would like any additional
information, please do not hesitate to give Lisa or :[ a call at your convenience.
Sincerely,
Tom Dodson
Attachment
cc: Ray Schooley
Randy Fleming
Larry Markham
Patricia K. Anders
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1 ~Depts~PLANNING~STAFFRPT~xJ1PA99 OCI.doc
8. City-initiated General Plan
Application No. PA97-0291)
Amendments and Zone
PlanComnVminutes/081899
Chancles {PlanninQ
Requests regarding Sites 1-3:
Site 1 - Amend the General Plan Land Use and the Zoning Maps for the City
of Temecula for a site identified as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 921-660-026, -
027, -041, and -042 located South of Via La Vida between Calle Palmas and
Via Sevilla from Medium Density Residential to Low Medium Density
Residential.
Site 2 - Amend the General Plan Land Use Map for the City of Temecula for
a site identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 944-330-019 and located between
Rancho Highlands Drive and Interstate 15 from Open Space to Highway
Tourist Commercial.
Site 3 - Amend the General Plan Land Use and the Zoning Maps for the City
.of Temecula for the southerly portion of a site identified as Assessor's
Parcel No. 950-120-004 and located west of Avenida de Missiones from
Open Space-Conservation to Professional Office.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning
Commission approve a resolution recommending adoption of an
ordinance.
Senior Planner Hogan presented the staff report (of record), highlighting the proposed
amendments; for Commissioner Webster, provided additional information regarding Site
2, and the rationale for inclusion in the General Plan, as amended.
Mr. Anthony Maielta, 29747 Calle Palmas, relayed concem with respect to the amount of
apartments in the Margarita area and the associated blighting.
For Mr. Maielta, Senior Planner Hogan reiterated the results of modifying density. form
Medium to Low Medium.
With regard to Commissioner Webster's concem regarding the Site No. 2 amendments
and the lack of consistency with the Specific Plan with respect to the Land Use Map,
specifically, the Open Space designated areas, Planning Manager Ubnoske
recommended that this portion of the amendment be brought back to the Commission at
a future point in time in order for staff due develop clarification.
In response to the recommendation to continue the proposed amendments with respect
to Site No. 2, Commissioner Webster recommended that staff further investigate the
Prior to Approval Requirements with respect to Alternate Transportation Plans, denoted
on page 43 of the Specific Plan.
MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to close the public headng; and to approve the
amendments proposed on Site Nos. I and 3; and to have staff bdng back to the
Commission proposed amendments for Site No. 2 at a future point in time.
11
PlanComm/mi nutesl081899
RESOLUTION NO. 99-30
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A RESOLUTION ENTITLED
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NOS. 921-660-026, 921-660-027, 921-660-041,
921-660-042,944-330-019, AND 950-120-004 (PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA99-0291)" AND ADOPT AN
ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS.
921-660-026, 921-660-027, 921-660-041, 921-660-
042,944-330-019, AND 950-120-004 (PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA99-0291 )"
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Webster and voice vote reflected
unanimous approval.
"'i:>LANNING MANAGER'S REPORT
ning Manager Ubnoske relayed that the Planning
~nner to the staff, Denise Thomas; and noted that she wi
to the ing Department.
added a
a great asset
Planning Ubnoske noted that the Wolf Workshop will be held at
the September 1 t99 Planning (:: meeting; and advised, for
Commissioners Nagg Webster she would relay their request
concerning receiving the ',iated pdor to the meeting.
Chairman Guerdero advised
community regarding the
workshops was the im of the Pala
~e pdmary concem expressed by the
:t dudng the recnetly held community
Planning Manl
denoting e~
provided each
personal lots.
with a GIS exhibit,
COMMISS
REPORTS
Commissioner Fahey and Attorney Cudey relayed that they would
attend the September 1, 1999 Planning Commission meeting due to
plans.
able to
12
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
\\TEMEC_FS101 \VOL1 ~Depts~P LANN ING~STAFFRP~I PA99 G!~l.doc
Project Title
Lead Agency Name and Address
Contact Person and Phone Number
Project Locations
Project Sponsor's Name and Address
General Plan Designation (Current)
Zoning (Current)
Proposed General Plan Designations)
Proposed Zoning District
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting
REVISED
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Environmental Checklist
Planning Application No. PA99-0291 (General Plan
Amendment and Zone Change)
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
David Hogan, Senior Planner
(909) 694-6400
Site 1 - A site located on the south side of Via La Vida
(APN's 921-660-026,-027,-041 and -042).
Site 2 - A small area located between Interstate 15 and
Rancho Highlands Drive (APN 944-330-019).
Site 3 - A portion of the site located on the west side of
Avenida de Missiones (APN 950-120-004)
City of Temecula
Site 1
Site 2
Site 3
Site 1
Site 2
Site 3
Site 1
Site 2
Site 3
Site 1
Site 2
Site 3
Site 1
Site 2
- Medium Density Residential
-Open Space (landscaped slope)
- Office Professional and Open Space
- Medium Density Residential (M)
- Specific Plan 2 - Planning Area 2
- Professional Office and Open Space-Conservation
- Low Medium Density Residential
- Highway Tourist Commercial
- Office Professional
- Low Medium Density Residential (LM)
- No changes proposed
- Professional Office (PO)
-- The site is surrounded by Medium and Low
Medium density single family residences.
- The site is located adjacent to developed
commercial and undeveloped high density
residential/commercial property and Interstate 15.
Site 3 - The site and the property to the west is vacant.
The property to the east contains single family
residences.
Other public agencies whose approval None.
is required
This Initial Environmental Study is being completed to compare the differences between the current
General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designations evaluated using the Final EIR for the City General
Plan with the proposed changes to the Land Use and Zoning Maps. For the purpose of this analysis,
equivalent impacts and reductions in overall impacts are being treated as "No Impact" in the attached
checklist.
The revisions to the earlier version of this Initial Environmental Study are shown in Ita~cs.
R:\CEQA',291 PA99 o EIS.doc
1
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following
pages.
Land Use Planning
Population and Housing
Geologic Problems
Water
Air Quality
Transportation/Circulation
Biological Resources
Energy and Mineral Resources
,f
Hazards
Noise
Public Services
Utilities and Service Systems
Aesthetics
Cultural Resources
Recreation
Mandatory Findings of Significance
None
Determination
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
,f
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on
an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least
one effect 1 ) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal
standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as
described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially
significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must
analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on 'the environment,
there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a)
have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have
been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation
measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
Signature Date: July 19, 1999
David Hogan For: The City of Temecula
R:\CEQA\291 PA99 - EIS.doc
2
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
1.a. Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
(Source 1, Figure 2-1, Page 2-17)
1.b. Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over
the project?
1.c. Be incompatible with existing land use in the
vicinity?
1.d. Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g.
impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from
incompatible land uses)? (Source 1, Figure 5-4,
Page 5-17)
1.e. Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community (including low-income or
minority community)?
,f
,f
,/
,/'
V'
Comments
1 .a,c The project is three general plan amendments and two required zone changes that can be
characterized as (1) a reduction in a residential land use designation, (2) clarify a mapping
discontinuity between the general plan and the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan, and (3) a
mapping error in the original General Plan. The General Plan Land Use Map shows an area
of open space for Change No. 2 that appears to correspond to a previously envisioned
landscaped slope between previously subdivided parcels. Because the Specific Plan did not
really envision an open space area in this location, and a non-open space lot has already
been created, Change No. 2 appears to be a mapping error that is proposed for correction.
The area represented by Change No. 3 was shown as an open space element of the
Temecula Creek channel. Further research as indicated that the property is actually not part
of the channel and should have been designated as Office Professional on the General Plan
Land Use map. The area of this change comprises about 2 acres As a result, the
environmental impacts associated with this project are expected to be similar to the originally
anticipated in the Environmental Impact Report for the City General Plan.
1 .b The project will not conflict with applicable environmental plans or polices adopted by
agencies with jurisdiction over the project. The impacts from the General Plan Land Use
Designations were analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report the General Plan. Agencies
with jurisdiction within the City commented on the scope of the analysis contained in the EIR
and how the land uses would impact their particular agency. Mitigation measures approved
with the EIR will be applied to this project. Further, all agencies with jurisdiction over the
project are also being given the opportunity to comment on the project and it is anticipated
that they will make the appropriate comments as to how the project relates to their specific
environmental plans or polices. No significant effects are anticipated as a result of this
project.
1 .d Both sites are vacant properties surrounded by urban scale development. Neither site has
been used for agricultural activities within the last twenty years. As a consequence, any
environmental impacts associated with this project are expected to be equivalent to those
impacts identified in the original General Plan.
R:\CEQA\291PA99 - EIS.doc
3
1.6
Potentially
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant Unless Significant No
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Incorporated
The project will not disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community
(including low-income or minority community. As a consequence no significant effects are
anticipated as a result of this project.
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would be proposal:
2.a.
2.c.
Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population Projects? (Source 1, Page 2-23)
Induce substantial growth in an area either directly
or indirectly (e.g. through project in an undeveloped
area or extension of major infrastructure)?
Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing? (Source 1, Figure 2-1, Page 2-17)
Comments
The project will not result in development that would cumulatively exceed official regional or
local population projections, will not induce substantial growth in the area either directly or
indirectly, and will not displace any type of housing. The project sites are either already
developed or are proposed to remain substantially undeveloped. As a result, no significant
effects are anticipated from this project.
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or
Expose people to potential impacts involving?
3.a.
3.b.
3.c.
3.d.
3.e.
3.f.
3.g.
3.h.
3.i.
Fault rupture? (Source 1, Figure 7-1, Page 7-6 )
Seismic ground shaking?
Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
(Source 1, Figure 7-2, Page 7-8)
Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard?
Landslides or mudflows? (Source 1, Figure 7-2,
Page 7-8)
Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil
conditions form excavation, grading or fill?
Subsidence of the land? (Source 1, Figure 7-2,
Page 7-8)
Expansive soils?
Unique geologic or physical features?
Comments
This project does not represent a change from the impacts addressed in the original EIR for
the City General Plan. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified.
4. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
4.a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or
the rate and mount of surface runoff?
4.b. Exposure of people or property to water related
R:\CEQA\291PA99 - EIS.doc
4
4.c.
4.d.
4.e.
4.f.
4.g.
4.h.
4.i.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
hazards such as flooding? (Source 1, Figure 7-3,
Page 7-10; Figure 7-4, Page 7-)
Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of
surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity)?
Changes in the amount of surface water in any
water body?
Changes in currents, or the course or direction of
water movements?
Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or
through substantial loss of groundwater recharge
capability?
Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
Impacts to groundwater quality?
Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater.
Otherwise available for public water supplies?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impac~
Comments
This project does not represent a change from the impacts addressed in the original EIR for
the City General Plan. However, there is the potential that the operation of the detention area
will result in an incremental increase in local groundwater recharge. As a result, no additional
impacts have been identified.
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
5.a.
5.b.
5.c.
5.d.
Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation? (Source
1, Page 2-29)
Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
Alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or
cause any change in climate?
Create objectionable odors?
Comments
The proposed General Plan and Zoning amendments does not represent a noticeable change
in vehicle trips, the major source of air pollution in the southwest portion of Riverside County.
The amendment would in approximately the same number of vehicle trips as was originally
envisioned in the EIR for the General Plan. As a result, this project represents an insignificant
change in the impacts addressed in the original EIR for the City General Plan.
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in:
6.a.
Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp
curves or dangerous intersections or incompatible
R:\CEQA\291 PA99 - EIS.doc
5
6.c.
6.d.
6.e.
6.f.
6.g.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
uses)?
Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby
uses?
Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site?
Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
Conflicts with adopted policies supporting
alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle
racks)?
Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impac~
Comments:
The proposed General Plan and Zoning amendments does not represent a noticeable change
in vehicle trips, the major source of air pollution in the southwest portion of Riverside County.
The amendment for Site 1 could result in a reduction of approximately 230 vehicle trips per
day. The amendment for Site 2 could result in an increase of up to approximately 500 vehicle
trips per day. The amendment for Site 3 could result in an increase of up to approximately
475 vehicle trips per day. As a result, this project represents an insignificant change in the
impacts addressed in the original EIR for the City General Plan given the number of trip
generation decreases that have also occurred in recent years.
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES:
Would the proposal result in impacts to:
7.a.
7.b.
7.c.
7.d.
7.e.
Endangered, threatened or rare species or their
habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish,
insects, animals and birds)?
Locally designated species (e.g.heritage trees)?
Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak
forest, coastal habitat, etc.)?
Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal
pool)?
Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
Comments:
This project does not represent a change from the impacts addressed in the original EIR for
the City General Plan. As a result, the project is expected to result in no change in the impact
to biologic impacts.
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
8.a.
8.c.
Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
Use non-renewal resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner?
Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of future value to the region
and the residents of the State?
R:\CEQA\291 PA99 - EIS.doc
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Potentially
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant Unless Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact impact
Incorporated
Comments:
8.all. This project does not represent a change from the impacts addressed in the original EIR for
the City General Plan. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
9.a. A risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including, but not limited to:
oil, pesticides, chemical or radiation)?
Possible interference with an emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?
The creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?
Exposure of people to existing sources of potential
health hazards?
Increase fire hazard in areas with fiammable brush,
grass, or trees?
9.b.
9.c.
9.d.
9.e.
Comments:
9.all. This project does not represent a change from the impacts addressed in the original EIR for
the City General Plan. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified
10. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
10.a.
10.b.
Increase in existing noise levels? (Source 1, page
8-9)
Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
Comments:
10.all. This project does not represent a change from the impacts addressed in the original EIR for
the City General Plan. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified.
11. PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the following areas:
11.a.
11.b.
11.c.
11.d.
11.e.
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
Other governmental services?
Comments:
R:\CEQA\291 PA99 - EIS.doc
7
11.a11.
Potentially
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant Unless Significant No
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Incorporated
The project will not have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental
services. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS: Would the proposal
result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
12.a. Power or natural gas? ,/'
12.b. Communications systems?
12.c. Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities?
12.d. Sewer or septic tanks? ,/'
12.e. Storm water drainage? ,/'
12.f. Solid waste disposal?
12.g. Local or regional water supplies?
Commerlts:
12.a. The project will not result in a need for new utility systems or substantial alterations to existing
facilities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
13.a. Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?
13.b. Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic affect? ,/'
13.c. Create light or glare? ,/'
Comments:
13.all. This project does not represent a change from the impacts addressed in the original EIR for
the City General Plan. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
14.a. Disturb paleontological resources? (Source 2,
Figure 55 )
14.b. Disturb archaeological resources? (Source 1, Page
281)
14.c. Affect historical resources? ,/'
14.d. Have the potential to cause a physical change ,/'
which would affect unique ethnic cultural values?
14.e. Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
Comments:
14.all. This project does not represent a change from the impacts addressed in the original EIR for
the City General Plan. As a result, no additional impacts have been identified.
R:\CEQA\291PA99 - EIS.doc
8
Issues and Supporting information Sources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
15.a.
15.b.
Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional
parks or other recreational facilities?
Affect existing recreational opportunities?
Comments:
15.a11.
The project will not impact or increase in demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other
recreational facilities or affect the quality or quantity of existing recreational resources or
opportunities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
16.a.
16.b.
16.c.
16.d.
Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
Does the project have the potential to achieve short-
term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals?
Does the project have impacts that area individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects).
Does the project have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
Comments: None
EARLIER ANALYSES. The Final Environmental Impact Report for the City of Temecula General
Plan, Certified in 1993.
SOURCES
1. City of Temecula General Plan.
2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report.
R:\CEQA\291PA99 - EIS,doc
9
ITEM 24
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager(:~)~,~.,~
September 14, 1999
An Appeal of the Planning Commission's Decision to deny Planning Application No.
PA99-0236, a Development Plan Revision to reconfigure a part of the Winchester
Meadows Shopping Center, and Planning Application No. PA99-0012, a Conditional
Use Permit to build and operate a 5,310 square foot Winston Tire Store, located at
the northwest corner of Margarita Road and Winchester Road.
Prepared by: Thomas Thornsley, Project Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommends the City Council:
1. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DENYING THE APPEAL OF PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA99-0236 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN RE-
VISION-APPEAL) AND PA99-0012 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-
APPEAL), UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S
DECISION TO DENY PLANNING APPLICATION PA99-0236, A
DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVISION PROPOSAL TO
RECONFIGURE A PORTION OF THE WINCHESTER MEADOWS
SHOPPING CENTER BY INCORPORATING AN ABANDONED
WELL SITE AND RELOCATING AND ENLARGING TWO
UNDEVELOPED PAD SITES TOTALING 1.3 ACRES; AND
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0012 A DEVELOPMENT
PLAN FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A 5,310
SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING ON .7 OF AN ACRE
AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE OPERATION OF
AN AUTOMOTIVE TIRE AND SERVICE STORE LOCATED ON
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND
WINCHESTER ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCELS NO.
911-170-091 AND 911-170-098 AND AS PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL
MAP 28934.
F:\Depts\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc 1
BACKGROUND: On July 21, 1999, the Planning Commission denied Planning Application
No. PA99-0236, a Development Plan Revision, which proposed to reconfigure a portion of the
Winchester Meadows Shopping Center, located at the northeast corner of Margarita Road and
Winchester Road. The revision was intended to add .2 acres to the existing shopping center
and reconfigure two of the previously approved building pads at the corner of Margarita and
Winchester Roads. Planning Application No. PA99-0012, a Conditional Use Permit, proposes
to build and operate a 5,310 square foot Winston Tire Store for tire sales, installation, and
additional automotive service.
The site recon~guration, as proposed, placed the building pad on the corner of the lot with the
building backing up to Margarita Road with the service bays clearly visible from Winchester Road.
The visibility of the service bays from the roadway is in conflict with the City's Design Guidelines
regarding Auto Repair and Services.
On July 30, 1999, Robert Cahan, Canyon-Cahan Temecula, LLC, (owners of the Winchester
Meadows Shopping Center), filed a formal appeal of the Planning Commission's decision on both
projects (See Attachment 2).
DISCUSSION: The zoning for this shopping center is Community Commercial and in this
zone businesses that provide automotive services are conditionally permitted. Conditional uses
under 10,000 square feet are typically taken to a Director's Hearing. However, because this
proposal required modification of the original development plan for the Winchester Meadows
Shopping Center, Planning Commission approval was required for both projects.
Development Plan Issues:
Several Commissioners noted that the original concept for the Winchester Meadows Shopping
Center was to create a commercial center that was pedestrian-oriented with plazas and gathering
places. They felt that an auto service and repair facility would detract form the character intended
with the original approval and the General Plan's Community Design Element. The Community
Design Element states that, "the urban form must address the special character of the activity
areas of the City, including the role of the commercial center," and that the urban form "is
functional, conveys a 'sense of place,' and is aesthetically pleasing and sensitive to the natural
environmental character of the area."
The Commission also cited the necessity to install a screen wall and heavy landscaping to block
the view of the service bays from oncoming traffic. The City's Design Guidelines recommend that
automotive service bays not face toward the street. This particular corner serves as focal point for
this area of the City. With the location of the building on the corner lot, the service bays would be
visible form one street or the other regardless of the placement of the building on the site.
According to the Commission, this proposed screening wall and landscaping would suggest that
something is being hidden. They noted that the building and the screening methods would block
the view into this center and they felt that the view of this site and its business should be open and
inviting to draw in members of the community.
Conditional Use Permit Issues:
The Planning Commission cited an abundance (five) of automotive service business along the
north side of Winchester Road between Margarita Road and Ynez Road. They did not object to
them in the other locations: they and felt that it was an appropriate place for these businesses
because of the strip commercial design along this stretch of Winchester Road.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
2
They further noted that automotive service businesses are only conditionally permitted in the
Community Commercial (CC) zone and are a permitted use in the Highway Tourist (HT) and the
Light Industrial (LI) zones. The Commissioners felt that the proposed Winston Tire shop or any tire
shop at this location would not be in keeping with the intent to be community odented and provide
people with a place to interact. Auto serves business are not designed or intended to draw people
in for social gathering and interaction. Most auto service activities have the potential to be noisy
and unsightly and by locating this business on the corner of the site it does not provide a personal
attraction for people to come into the center.
After hearing staffs report, taking public testimony, and holding Commission discussion both
projects were denied by a unanimous 5-0 vote. The only person to speak on this project was the
architect, Thomas Davis. Neither the appellant, Robert Cahan, nor a representative from Winston
Tire were in attendance.
The cited justifications for the Appeal are addressed below.
APPEAL ANALYSIS: In his appeal request, Mr. Cahan cited three pdmary reasons why the
City Council should overturn the Planning Commissions denial and approve both projects.
Reason 1. "This item (PA99-0236) was not discussed by the commission and was inadvertently
denied along with PA99-0012. It should be reconsidered on its own merit and voted
upon as a separate issue. There is no reason to deny this item based upon its use."
Response: The Planning Commission reviewed and responded to both applications as one
project because the conditional use permit request made it necessary to revise the
original approval for the center (Planning Application No. PA97-0305). The
Development Plan Revisions, as presented, showed a direct relationship to the
other application for Winston Tires. The City Attorney found that there was no
problem with the Commission making one motion to deny both projects.
Reason 2. "The Commission wrongly determined that this use was inconsistent with the
Development Code. Per the staff report...it stated that 'The project is consistent
with the Community Commercial land use designation and the Community
Commercial zoning.' The commission did not base its decision on the objective
facts that are c/early defined in the staff report.'
Response: In their deliberations, the Planning Commission did not concur with staffs
recommendations that this project (an auto service business) was consistent with
the Community Commercial land use designation in this location. The Commission
that it would take away from the intended character of this Community Commercial
center, which is to serve the personal needs of the individuals in the community and
provide people with businesses that fostered interaction.
Additionally, they felt that there are designated zoning districts within the City that
permitted this type of intensive use. In citing justifications they referenced the need
to install a screen wall with heavy landscaping just to hide the view of the service
bays. The purpose of a conditional use permit is to enable site specific review for
a use or business activity that may not be desirable in all locations. The staff report
contains background information and staffs recommendations. The Commission is
not required to accept or agree with staffs recommendations.
Reason 3. "The (Development Code) states that 'if the conditional use permit involves a new
building with less than 10,000 square feet, the director of planning shall have the
authority to approve, conditionally approve, or deny an application of a conditional
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP~12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
3
Response:
use permit.' The building under consideration is 5,310 square feet .... It is our
opinion that it should not have been submitted to the planning Commission and that,
in fact, its submittal is in direct conflict with the Development Code.'
When the original application for the Condition Use Permit was submitted for
Winston Tires it was determined that it altered the original site plan enough to
require a revision to that development plan. The Planning Commission approved the
original development plan and this proposed revision would also require their
approval. Since both of these projects are inter related and the Development Code
(Section 17.03.010) states "For a development application that requires more than
one permit or approval, the approving authority for the entire application shall be the
highest level of approval for any portion of the application."
SPECIFIC ACTION: Based upon the information in the Appeal and in the Planning Commission's
original denial, staff has identified three options:
Support the Planning Commission decision to deny the project and deny the appeal of
Planning Application Nos. PA99-0236 and PA99-0012 based on the findings that the project
fails to meet the City's zoning requirements, guidelines and policies regarding land use
compatibility and project design. The resolution to deny the appeal is contained in
Attachment No. 1.
Concur with a portion of the Appeal and approve Planning Application No. PA99-0236 for the
Development Plan Revision to the Winchester Meadows Shopping Center and direct that the
applicant work with staff to re-orient the building to address the screening and site layout
issues. The resolution to partially approve the appeal is contained in Attachment No. 2.
Approve the Appeal of Planning Application No. PA99-0236 for the Development Plan
Revision to the Winchester Meadows Shopping Center and PA99-0012 for the Conditional
Use Permit to permit the development and operation of Winston Tires. The resolutions to
approve the appeals are contained in Attachment No. 2 and Attachment No. 3.
FINDINGS - DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVISION
In approving or denying a development plan Section 17.05.010.F. of the Temecula Municipal Code,
requires that the decision-making body must make the following findings;
That the proposed use is in conformance with the general plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city.
That the overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
FINDINGS-CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
In approving or denying a Conditional Use Permit the Temecula Municipal Code, Section
17.04.010.E. requires that, "In considering applications for conditional use permits, the hearing
body, with such conditions as are deemed reasonable in approving or conditionally approving the
use, shall find the use will not jeopardize, adversely affect, endanger or otherwise constitute a
menace to the public health, safety or general welfare.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP~12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
4
To approve or conditionally approve a conditional use permit, the planning commission or planning
director (or planning commission and city council on appeal) must make the following findings:
That the proposed conditional use is consistent with the general plan and the development
code.
That the proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development
of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not
adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures.
That the site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate
the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other
development features prescribed in this development code and required by the planning
commission or council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood.
That the nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and
general welfare of the community.
That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a conditional
use permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the
planning commission or city council on appeal.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
Attachments:
5.
6.
7.
City Council Resolution No. 99-
City Council Resolution No. 99-
Exhibit A - Page 16
City Council Resolution No. 99-
Exhibit A - Page 23
Exhibit B - Page 34
Appeal of the Planning Commission Decision - Page 37
Automotive Service Business Locations along Winchester Road - Page 38
Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated July 21, 1999 - Page 39
Draft Minutes of the Planning Commission hearing of July 21, 1999 - Page 40
__ - To Deny the Appeals - Page 6
__ - To Approve the Appeal of PA99-0236 - Page 12
__ - To Approve the Appeal of PA99-0012 - Page 19
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'I~12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
5
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 99-
TO DENY THE APPEALS OF PA99-0236 AND PA99-0012
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
6
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DENYING THE APPEAL OF PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA99-0236 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN RE-
VISION-APPEAL) AND PA99-0012 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-
APPEAL), UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S
DECISION TO DENY PLANNING APPLICATION PA99-0236, A
DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVISION PROPOSAL TO
RECONFIGURE A PORTION OF THE WINCHESTER MEADOWS
SHOPPING CENTER BY INCORPORATING AN ABANDON WELL
SITE AND RELOCATING AND ENLARGING TWO UNDEVEL-
OPED PAD SITES TOTALING 1.3 ACRES; AND PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA99-0012 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR
THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT OF A 5,310 SQUARE FOOT
COMMERCIAL BUILDING ON .7 OF AN ACRE AND A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE OPERATION OF AN
AUTOMOTIVE TIRE AND SERVICE STORE LOCATED ON THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND
WINCHESTER ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCELS NO.
911-170-091 AND 911-170-098 AND AS PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL
MAP 28934.
WHEREAS, Fred Stephenson, Cahan Properties, initiated Planning Application Nos. PA99-
0236 (Development Plan Revision) and PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit), in accordance with
the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application Nos. PA99-0236 (Development Plan Revision) and PA99-
0012 (Conditional Use Permit) were processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the
timely manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, Temecula Library,
Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application Nos. PA99-0236
(Development Plan Revision) and PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit) on July 21, 1999, at a duly
noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had
an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission headng and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission denied Planning Application Nos. PA99-0236 (Development Plan
Revision) and PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit);
WHEREAS, an Appeal was filed on July 30, 1999 requesting that Planning Application Nos.
PA99-0236 (Development Plan Revision - Appeal) and PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit -
Appeal) be brought before the City Council for their consideration;
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT%12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
7
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff
Repods regarding Planning Application Nos. PA99-0236 (Development Plan Revision) and PA99-
0012 (Conditional Use Permit); and,
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public headng pertaining to Planning Application
Nos. PA99-0236 (Development Plan Revision - Appeal) and PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit
- Appeal) on September 14, 1999, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to, and did
testify either in support or opposition to Planning Application Nos. PA99-0326 and PA99-0012;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings for Development Plan Revision. That City Council, in denying
Planning Application No. PA99-0236 (Development Plan Revision - Appeal) and upholding the
Planning Commission's decision to deny PA99-0236 (Development Plan Revision) hereby makes
the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code;
A. The proposal to reconfigured the shopping center to facilitate a commercial
automotive service business, is not in conformance with the land use designation and policies
reflected in the Community Commercial (CC) land use standards in the City of Temecula General
Plan, the Development Code, and the Design Guidelines as further discussed below:
1. In the General Plan and Development Code Community Commercial areas typically
include: neighborhood commercial uses as well as larger retail uses including supermarkets,
department stores, theaters, restaurants, professional and medical offices, and specialty retail
stores. The inclusion of an auto service and repair facility could conflict with the intended nature
of a Community Commercial center.
2. The Use Regulations for Community Commercial (CC) development contained in
the City's Development Code only allows automotive service businesses as a conditionally
permitted use. This application for the site reconfiguration directly and specifically related solely
to the proposed Conditional Use for the Winston Tires.
3. The lot configuration as proposed placed the building pad on the corner of the lot
with the building backing up to Margarita Road. With this layout the service bays of the proposed
use would be visible from the public right-of-way (Winchester Road) which is in conflict with the
City's Design Guidelines regarding Auto Repair and Services. This proposal is inconsistent with
the City's Design Guidelines which require that Auto Repair and Service facilities be designed so
that, "The interior of the work bays should not be visible form a public street."
B. The original project on the site was designed for the protection of the public health,
safety and welfare. However, the project as proposed would effect the welfare of the community
by allowing a more intensive automotive service than is permitted in the Community Commercial
zoned areas. The proposed pad locations change the character of the site by placing the building
pad site on the corner closest to Winchester and Margarita Roads which takes away the original
site plans concept that provide a more open and inviting view of the shopping center.
C. The design of the proposed improvements could cause environmental damage to
the aesthetics of the site and surrounding area depending on the proposed use and the potential
need to screen any objectionable features, thus taking away from the desired street scene along
Winchester Road as results from the currently approved Development Plan.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
8
Section 2. Findings for Conditional Use Permit. That City Council, in denying Planning
Application No. PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit - Appeal) and upholding the Planning
Commission's decision to deny Planning Application No. PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit)
hereby makes the following findings;
A. The proposed use sought by the application, a conditional use permit for a
commercial automotive service business, is not consistent with the land use designation and
policies reflected in the Community Commercial (CC) land use standards in the City of Temecula
General Plan, the Development Code, and the Design Guidelines as further described below:
1. Area designated Community Commercial under the General Plan and Development
Code "typically include some neighborhood commercial uses as well as larger retail uses including
supermarkets, department stores, theaters, restaurants, professional and medical offices, and
specialty retail stores." Under this land use designation automotive service and repair facilities
require a Conditional Use Permit review to determine if the additional intensity and impacts would
have an effect on the character of the site and the surrounding development. The development
of the Winston Tires shop would directly impact on Winchester Meadows center where the intent
is to foster pedestrian interaction.
2. This site is adjacent to areas designated in the General Plan for Village Center
Overlay to promote the development of centers which "provide a sense of place and focal points
for community activity." The development of this project, as proposed, would conflict with the
intended nature of Village Center development guidelines and would conflict with neighboring
properties. Automotive service and repair businesses do not seem to be the typical gathering place
envisioned by the General Plan.
3. The proposal is inconsistent with the General Plan's Community Design Plan, which
states that, "The urban form must address the special character of the activity areas of the City,
including the role of the commercial center," and that the urban form "is functional, conveys a
'sense of place,' and is aesthetically pleasing and sensitive to the natural environmental character
of the area."
4. The proposed use has a more intensive use than is desired within the original
concept of the Winchester Meadows Shopping Center. The Development Code's Use Regulations
for Community Commercial (CC) Only permits automotive service businesses as a conditionally
permitted use. This proposal would impact the intended character for this center for community
businesses and interaction. The Development Code designates two zones, Highway Toudst (HT)
and Light Industrial (LI) as areas where this type of use is permitted. These zoning designation
were intended to accommodate a variety of more intensive uses.
5. The lot configuration as proposed placed the building pad on the corner of the lot
with the building backing up to Margarita Road. With this layout the service bays of the proposed
use would be visible from the public right-of-way (Winchester Road) which is in conflict with the
City's Design Guidelines regarding Auto Repair and Services. This proposal is also inconsistent
with the City's Design Guidelines which require that Auto Repair and Service facilities should be
designed so that "The interior of the work bays should not be visible form a public street."
B. The overall design of the project, is incompatible with the nature, condition, and
development of adjacent uses, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated
site improvements and would adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. The
design and use of this site would conflict with the adjacent properties to the, which are required to
develop under the Village Design standards of the General Plan. Therefore, the proposed use and
the site design will not function in a manner consistent the adjacent uses.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
9
C. The site of this proposed conditional use is an in-fill commercial center of an
approved development plan. The development of this site is not adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the proposed building in such a fashion that the service bays would not be visible
from the public right-of way without affecting the yard, parking and loading, landscaping, and other
development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning
Commission in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood.
D. The original development project on the site is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety and welfare. However, the project as proposed would effect the welfare of the
community by allowing a more intensive automotive service than is permitted by right in the
Community Commercial zoned areas. The proposed pad locations change the character of the
site by placing the building pad site on the corner closest to Winchester and Margarita Roads which
takes away the original site plans concept that provide a more open and inviting view of the
shopping center.
E. The decision to deny the application for a conditional use permit, is based on
substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole, before the Planning Commission at the time
of their decision. This application has been brought before the Planning Commission at a Public
Hearing where members of the community have had an opportunity to be heard on this matter
before the Commission renders their decision.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
10
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 14th day of September, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution
No. was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 14th day of September, 1999, by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
\\TEMEC_FS101WOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R12pa99 CC Appl mv.doc
11
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 99-
TO APPROVE PA99-0236 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVISION)
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
12
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-
0236 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVISION PROPOSAL TO
RECONFIGURE A PORTION OF THE WINCHESTER MEADOWS
SHOPPING CENTER BY INCORPORATING AN ABANDON WELL
SITE AND RELOCATING AND ENLARGING TWO
UNDEVELOPED PAD SITES ON .7 OF AN ACRE; LOCATED ON
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND
WINCHESTER ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCELS NO.
911-170-091 AND 911-170-098 AND AS PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL
MAP 28934.
WHEREAS, Fred Stephenson, Winston Tires, filed Planning Application No. PA99-0236,
in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA99-0236 was processed including, but not limited
to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA99-0236 on
July 21, 1999, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission headng and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission denied Planning Application No. PA99-0236;
WHEREAS, an Appeal was filed on July 30, 1999 requesting that Planning Applications No.
PA99-0236be brought before the City Council for their consideration;
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff
Reports regarding Planning Applications No. PA99-0236;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to Planning Applications
No. PA99-0236 (Development Plan Revision - Appeal) on September 14, 1999, at which time
interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to Planning
Applications No. PA99-0236; and
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Council hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Council approved Planning Application No. PA99-0236;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
\\TEMEC_FS 101 \VOL1 \DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT%12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
13
Section 2. Findings. The City Council, in approving Planning Application No. PA99-0236
hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010. F of the Temecula Municipal
Code:
A. The proposal, a commercial automotive service business, is consistent with the land
use designation and policies reflected in the Community Commercial (CC) land use standards in
the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for Community
Commercial (CC) development contained in the City's Development Code. The site is therefore
properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of
commercial development proposed. The project as conditioned is also consistent with other
applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines,, Ordinance No. 655 (Mr. Palomar Lighting
Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions, and fire and building codes.
B. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and
other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and safety
of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has
been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations
intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent
with the public health, safety and welfare.
C. The design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There
are no fish, wildlife or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish, wildlife or
habitat off-site. The site is surrounded by development and is an in-fill site. Furthermore, grading
has already occurred at the site, which is a portion of a larger industrial park. The project will not
individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section
711.2 of the Fish and Game Code.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No.
PA99-0236 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15332. This
Section allows exemptions for in-fill development projects that meet certain prescribed criteria. The
subject site complies with these criteria and therefore the exemption can be applied to this project.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby conditionally
approves Planning Application No. PA99-0236 a Development Plan Revision which proposes to
recon~gure a portion of the Winchester Meadows Shopping Center by incorporating an abandon
well site and relocating and enlarging two undeveloped pad sites on a .7 of an acre, located at the
northwest corner of Margarita Road and Winchester Road, known as Assessor's Parcels No. 911-
170-098 and Parcel 4 of Parcel Map 28934, and subject to the project specific conditions set forth
in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference.
\\TEMEC_FS 101WOL1 \DEPTS\PLANN ING\STAFFRPT~I 2pa99 CC Appl rev,doc
14
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 14th day of September, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution
No. was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 14th day of September, 1999, by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
\\TEMEC_FS101%VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT%12pa99 CC Appl mv.doc
15
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT%12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
16
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA99-0236 (Development Plan, Revision)
Project Description: A request to reconfigure a portion of the Winchester Meadows
Shopping Center by incorporating an abandon well site and
relocating and enlarging two undeveloped pad sites located on
the northwest corner of Winchester Road and Margarita Road.
Development Impact Fee Category: Retail Commercial
Assessor's Parcel No.:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
911-170-091 & 098 and Parcel 4 of Parcel Map 28934
September 14, 1999
September 14, 2001
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of
Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file
the Notice of Determination with a DeMinimus Finding for the Mitigated or Negative
Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code
of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has
not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as
required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of
condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)].
General Requirements
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions,
awards, judgements, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek
monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the
approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal
board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning
the Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner
of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further
cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all
action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such
defense.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
17
o
The applicant shall comply with all underlying conditions of approval for PA97-0305
(Development Plan) and PA97-0368 (Tentative Parcel Map TPM 28697) which previously
applied and/or unless superseded or amended by these conditions of approval.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially to Exhibit E (Site Plan-
Revised), approved with Planning Application No. 99-0236, or as amended by these
conditions.
Pedestrian access shall be provide to all buildings and facilities that complies with
applicable disabled access regulations including the California Disabled Access
Regulations.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Unless otherwise noted, the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency shall complete all
conditions. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and
proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage
courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and
revision.
7. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
8. The approved Grading Plan shall be revised to incorporate the changes and shall be
prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the
Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control
measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property.
9. The applicant shall provide a copy of the recorded document, which reflects that the Rancho
California Water District well site has been abandoned to the Department of Public Works.
10. The Developer shall extend the existing ingress/egress easement from Parcel 4 of Parcel
Map No. 28939 to this project site.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Name printed
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'I'%12pa99 CC Appt rev.doc
18
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
TO APPROVE PA99-0012 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT)
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP~12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
19
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-
0012 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCT
OF A 5,310 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING ON .7 OF
AN ACRE AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT THE OPERATION
OF AN AUTOMOTIVE TIRE AND SERVICE STORE LOCATED ON
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND
WINCHESTER ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCELS NO.
911-170-091 AND 911-170-098 AND AS PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL
MAP 28934.
WHEREAS, Fred Stephenson, Winston Tires, filed Planning Application No. PA99-0012,
in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA99-0012 was processed including, but not limited
to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA99-0012 on
July 21, 1999, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission denied Planning Application No. PA99-0012;
WHEREAS, an Appeal was filed on July 30, 1999 requesting that Planning Applications No.
PA99-0012 be brought before the City Council for their consideration;
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff
Reports regarding Planning Applications No. PA99-0012;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public headng pertaining to Planning Applications
No. PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit -Appeal)on September 14, 1999, at which time interested
persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to Planning
Applications No. PA99-0012; and
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Council hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Council approved Planning Application No. PA99-0012;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP~12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
20
Section 2. Conditional Use Permit Findings. The City Council, in approving Planning
Application No. PA99-0012 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010.E
of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposal, a conditional use permit for a commercial automotive service
business, is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected in the Community
Commercial (CC) land use standards in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the
development standards for Community Commercial (CC) development contained in the City's
Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically
suitable for the type and density of commercial development proposed. The project as conditioned
is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines,, Ordinance No.
655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions, and
fire and building codes.
B. The overall design of the project, is compatible with the nature, condition, and
development of adjacent uses, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated
site improvements and will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. The
project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has been found to be consistent with, all
applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development
will be constructed and function in a manner consistent the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures.
C. The site of this proposed conditional use is an in-fill site of an approved
development plan. The development of this site adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
building while meeting the yard, parking and loading, landscaping, and other development features
prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission in order to integrate
the use with other uses in the neighborhood.
D, The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety
and general welfare of the community. Base on the type of use as proposed and as conditioned,
will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community
E. The decision to approve the application for a conditional use permit is based on
substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission at the time
of their decision. This application has been brought before the Planning Commission at a Public
Hearing where members of the community have had an opportunity to be heard on this matter
before the Commission renders their decision.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No.
PA99-0236 and PA99-0012 were made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines
Section 15332. This Section allows exemptions for in-fill development projects that meet certain
prescribed criteria. The subject site complies with these criteria and therefore the exemption can
be applied to this project.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby conditionally
approves Planning Application No. PA99-0012 for a Development Plan for the design, construct
of a 5,310 square foot commercial building on .7 of an acre and a Conditional Use Permit the
operation of an automotive tire and service store, located at the northwest comer of Margadta Road
and Winchester Road, and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 911-170-098 and Parcel 4 of Parcel
Map 28934, and subject to the project specific conditions set forth in Exhibit A (Development Plan),
and Exhibit B (Conditional Use Permit), attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
21
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 14th day of September, 1999.
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution
No. was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 14th day of September, 1999, by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPTH2pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
22
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
(DEVELOPMENT PLAN)
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP~12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
23
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA99-0012 (Development Plan - Winston Tire Store)
Project Description: A proposal to build and operate a 5,310 square foot tire store for
tire sales and installation with additional automotive service
and repair located on the northwest corner of Winchester Road
and Margarita Road.
Development Impact Fee Category: Service Commercial
Assessor's Parcel No.:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
911-170-091 & 098 and Parcel 4 of Parcel Map 28934
July 21, 1999
July 21, 2001
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of
Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file
the Notice of Determination with a DeMinimus Finding for the Mitigated or Negative
Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code
of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has
not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as
required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of
condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)].
General Requirements
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions,
awards, judgements, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek
monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the
approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal
board or legislative body including actions appreved by the voters of the City, concerning
the Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner
of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further
cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all
action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such
defense.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
24
The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Planning Application No. PA99-
0012, unless superseded by these conditions of approval. All these conditions shall be
complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this conditional use permit.
The applicant shall comply with all underlying conditions of approval for PA97-0305
(Development Plan), PA97-0368 (Tentative Parcel Map TPM 28697) and PA99-0236
(Development Plan, Revision) which previously applied and/or unless superseded or
amended by these conditions of approval.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially to Exhibit F (Site Plan),
approved with Planning Application No. 98-0512, or as amended by these conditions.
The development of the building shall conform substantially to Exhibit H (Elevations),
approved with Planning Application No. 98-0512, or as amended by these conditions.
The installation of the landscaping and screen wall along Winchester shall be in substantial
conformanco with the site and landscape plans (Exhibits F & I) for the purpose of screening
the view of the service bays from the public right-of-way. Pdor to the release for occupancy
staff will assess the installation of the screening materials to verify that they provide the
intended screening. Should the screening be deficient the Planning Manager shall have
the authority to require the developer to provide additional screening to meet the intent of
the City's Design Guidelines. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be
the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest.
Landscaping shall conform substantially with the approved Conceptual Landscape Plan
(Exhibit I), and the criteria set forth in the General Plan, or as amended by these conditions.
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the satisfaction of
the Planning Manager and the Development Code. If it is determined that the landscaping
is not being maintained, the Planning Manager shall have the authority to require the
property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape
plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the
developer or any successors in interest.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
25
10.
The colors and materials used for this industrial building shall conform substantially to the
approved color and material board, or as amended by these conditions.
Material Color
Exterior Plaster wall and columns
Base Accent Band
Cornice and Accent
Secondary Field
Canvas Awnings
Tile and Metal Roof
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
Frazee #CW055X "Honeywind" (white)
Frazee #8733M "Walnut Wash" (beige)
Frazee #8243M "Amber Waves" (tan)
Frazee #8733M ,'Walnut Wash" (beige)
Frazee #7764M "Coffee 'N Cream" (tan)
Frazee #7794M "Appealing Apricot" (apricot)
Sunbrella #-4623 "Aquamarine" (aquamarine)
AEP. Span "Hemlock Green (olive green)
Summetville 552 "Verdigris" (aqua green)
11.
The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10"
glossy photographic color prints each of the Color and Materials Board and the colored
architectural Elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall
be readable on the photographic prints.
12.
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
13.
The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one
signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
14.
All mechanical and roof-mounted equipment shall be hidden by building elements that were
designed for that purpose as an integral part of the building.
15. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
16.
Three (3) copies of detailed Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be
submitted to the Planning Department for review approval. The location, number, genus,
species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. These plans shall be consistent
with the Water Efficient Ordinance and conform substantially to the approved Conceptual
Landscape Plan (Exhibit I) or as amended by these conditions. The cover page shall
identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be
accompanied by the following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of planrings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
26
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
17.
Separate building permit applications for the installation of signage shall be submitted in
conformance with City Ordinances, Design Guidelines, and Development Code.
18.
All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition
acceptable to the Planning Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds,
disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working
order.
19.
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Manager, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction
landscape and irrigation plans, shall be filed with the Community Development Department
- Planning Division for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the
landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the
Planning Manager, the bond shall be released.
20.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground,
or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-
street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously
stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for
persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense.
Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000."
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3
square feet in size.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
21.
Comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing
and Mechanical Codes; 1996 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title
24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code.
22.
Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other
outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building
and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
23.
A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP~12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
27
24. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
25. The Occupancy classification of the proposed buildings shall be S-3/B.
26. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
27. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
28. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
29. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
30. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
31. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
32. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1994
edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, Appendix C.
33. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
34. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans
submitted for plan review.
35. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review.
36. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
37. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
38. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
39. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Unless otherwise noted, the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency shall complete all
conditions. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and
proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage
courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and
revision.
\\TEMEC_FS101~VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
28
General Requirements
40. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall
be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
41. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
42.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Califomia Department of Transportation
prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed State right-of-
way.
43.
All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent
projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on
standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
44.
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and pdvate property
45.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
46.
A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
47.
The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and
identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect
the properties and mitigate any impacts. The Developer shall provide any upgrading or
upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements
necessary to make required improvements.
48.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
49.
As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'D.12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
29
50.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
51.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
52.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check
or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan
fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
53.
The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map as Flood Zone A. This
project shall comply with Chapter 15, Section 15.12 of the City Municipal Code which may
include obtaining a Letter of Map Revision from FEMA. A Flood Plain Development Permit
shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
54.
Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of
Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The following design criteria shall be observed:
Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages
in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400. 401and 402.
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
55.
The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
56.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
57.
The Developer shall extend the existing ingress/egress easement from Parcel 4 of Parcel
Map No. 28939 to this project site.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
58.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\DEPTS\PLANNI NG\STAFFRP'R12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
30
59.
All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
60.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department
of Public Works.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions
regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
61.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are
in force at the time of building plan submittal.
62.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix Ill.A, Table A-Ill-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at
20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM for a
total fire flow of 2350 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic
fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as
given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix II1-
A)
63.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill-B, Table A-Ill-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6"
x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent
public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart and shall be located no more than
250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a
hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the
system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and
Appendix Ill-B)
64.
As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the building(s) is in excess of
150 feet from a water supply on a public street, on site fire hydrants are required. For this
project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
65.
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
66.
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1 \DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R12pa99 CC Appl rev,doc
31
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Depadment vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet.
( CFC sec 902)
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred
and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be:
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards.
After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to
the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire
hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any
combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2
and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1 )
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, all commercial buildings
shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the building. The
numerals shall be minimum twelve (12) inches in height for buildings and six (6) inches for
suite identification on a contrasting background. In strip centers, businesses shall post the
suite address on the rear door(s). (CFC 901.4.4)
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans
shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC
Article 10)
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be
located to the right side of the main entrance door. The Knox-Box shall be supervised by
the alarm system. (CFC 902.4)
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
32
OTHER AGENCIES
76.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside
Department of Environmental Health's transmittal January 27, 1999, a copy of which is
attached.
77.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water Districts transmittal January 25, 1999, a copy of which is attached.
78.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in Riverside Transit Agency
transmittal January 26, 1999, a copy of which is attached.
79.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in CALTRANS transmittal
January 26, 1999, a copy of which is attached.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Name printed
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
33
EXHIBIT B
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
(CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT)
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1 \DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
34
EXHIBIT B
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit- Winston Tire Store)
Project Description: A proposal to build and operate a 5,310 square foot tire store for
tire sales and installation with additional automotive service
and repair located on the northwest corner of Winchester Road
and Margarita Road.
Development Impact Fee Category: Service Commercial
Assessor's Parcel No.:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
911-170-091 & 098 and Parcel 4 of Parcel Map 28934
September 14, 1999
September 14, 2001
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions,
awards, judgements, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek
monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the
approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal
board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning
the Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner
of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further
cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all
action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such
defense.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Planning Application No. PA99-
0012, unless superseded by these conditions of approval. All these conditions shall be
complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this conditional use permit.
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
35
This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's
Development Code.
The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval
of this Conditional Use Permit.
The installation of the landscaping and screen wall along Winchester shall be in substantial
conformance with the site and landscape plans (Exhibits F & I) for the purpose of screening
the view of the service bays from the public right-of-way. Pdor to the release for occupancy
staff will assess the installation of the screening materials to verify that they provide the
intended screening. Should the screening be deficient the Planning Manager shall have
the authority to require the developer to provide additional screening to meet the intent of
the City's Design Guidelines. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be
the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest.
At the end of the first year of occupancy, and prior to the release of the Landscape Security
Bond, the landscaping will be inspected for conformance with the screening requirement.
Should replacement landscaping be needed the owner will be required to make these
improvements.
The use of window signs will be limited to those permitted by the City's Sign Ordinance No.
98-10 and in no case shall more than 20% of the window areas be used for signage.
OTHER AGENCIES
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside
Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated June 17, 1998, a copy of which is
attached.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, I understand and I accept all the above
mentioned Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the
project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Name printed
\\TEMEC_FS101%VOL1 \DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT%12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
36
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
APPEAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0236 AND PA99-0012
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
37
City of Temecula
Community Development Department
43200 Business Park Drive · Temecula · CA · 92590
P,O, Box 9033, Temecula · CA · 92589-9033
(909) 694-6400 · FAX (909) 694-6477
Date Stamp
Appeal
SEE
Original Case Number(s)
A. PURPOSE
ATTACHED LETTER
PA99-0236-LOT
FOR ALL ITEMS
RECONFIGURATION
PA99-0012-WINSTON TIRE
The purpose of the appeal procedure is to provide a method of recourse for persons aggrieved by or
dissatisfied with an action taken by an administrative agency of the City in the administration or
enforcement of any provisions of the Development Code.
B. FIIXNG REQUIRF, MFNTS
l. Development Application.
2. Appeal Form.
3. Filing Fee.
C. NOTICF. OF APPEAl. - TIIVfE 1 IMIT
A notice of an appeal by any individual who is aggrieved by or dissatisfied with a decision made by
him or in his behalf, or with any action, order, requirement, decision or determination shall not be
acted upon unless filed within ~ (15) calendar days after service of written notice of the decision.
D. NOTICE OF APPF-AI.- CONTF. NTS
Appealing the decision of.' PLANNING COMMISSION 7/21/99
(Specify Director of Planning or Planning Commission AND Action Date)
Specify exactly what is being appealed: w~. AR~. APPRAI,TNG THE DECISION OF THE
COMMISSION TO DENY THE RECONFIGURATION OF THE WINCHESTER MEADOWS
i'SHOPPING CENTER (PA-0236) AND THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW WINSTON TIRE STORE (PA99-0012.
PLANNING
FOR THE."';'Zi 7. . ;
R:\FAGAI~IXAPPLIC\APP.APP 7/16/97 k],b
Reason or justification to support the appeal. Appellant must submit with this appeal each issue which
the appellant alleges was wrongly determined together with every agreement and a copy of every item
of evidence. (Attach separate sheet of paper if necessary).
FOR PA99-0236: THIS ITEM WAS NOT DISCUSSED BY THE COMMISSION AND WAS
INADVERTENTLY DENIED ALONG WITH PA99-0012. IT SHOULD BE RECONSIDERED ON
ITS OWN MERIT AND VOTED UPON AS A SEPARATE ISSUE. THERE IS NO REASON TO
DENY THIS ITEM BASED UPON ITS USE.
FOR PA-0012: THE~.:COMMtSSION.:'WRONGLY DETERMINED THAT THIS USE WAS
INCONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT CODE. PER THE STAFF REPORT (7/21/99)
PAGE 4 UNDER THE PARAGRAPH TITLED "GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY"
IT STATES THAT "THE PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
(CC) LAND USE DESIGNATION AND THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) ZONING
APPLICABLETO THE PROPERTY IN THE TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT
CODE". THE COMMISSION DID NOT"BASE ITS DECISION ON THE OBJECTIVE FACTS
THAT ARE CLEARLY DEFINED IN THE STAFF REPORT. THEREFORE, WE FEEL THAT
THIS DECISION IN INCORRECT AND SHOULD BE SUCCESSFULLY APPEALED.
Desired action to be taken:
WE REOUEST THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THIS APPEAL FOR PA99-0236 AND
PA99-0012
In the event any Notice of Appeal applicant fails to answer any information set forth above, then
the request will be returned to the appellant, with a statement of the deficiencies. The appellant
shall be allowed five (5) calendar days in which to refile the notice of appeal.
~.:\FAGAM4~APPI, IC\APPoAPP 7/16/97 klb 2
Appeal to the City Council
of Planning Commission necision to deny
Planning Application No. PA99-0236 and No. PA99-0012
At the Planning Commission meeting held July 21, 1999 the Commission denied
the above applications. This letter is being submitted as a formal appeal of that denial.
The City's form titled 'Appeal" has been completed and is attached as a supplement to
this letter.
As noted above, there are two Planning Application numbers. Since these
applications are not related to one another we request the Council to act on them as
separate items. Therefore, we have separated the descriptions of these items below.
Planning Application No. PA99-0936 - Iot Recon~gurafion
(Ploa3c refer to sitc planc in Exhibit E)-(Please see Attachment 6, Exhibits D, E & F)
This application is a request to reconfigure a portion of the Winchester Meadows
Shopping Center by incorporating the abandoned well site and relocating and enlarging
two undeveloped pads.
The original Winchester Meadows site plan was approved as Application No.
PA97-0305 on 12/15/97. At that time the well site was owned by another party and was
not part of the Winchester Meadows site.
In 1999 the Applicant purchased the abandoned well site to incorporate it into
the design of the shopping center resulting in a safer and more pleasing design for the
corner of the site. The inclusion of the well site made it necessary to reconfigure the lot
lines to include the well site into the overall shopping center design. This application
simply involves surveying and a necessary lot line adjustment to make the resulting lots
usable. It does not affect the "use" of the site.
This item was not discussed by the Commission at the meeting and was
mistakenly denied as part of No. PA99-0012. We request that this item be approved
separately from No. PA99-0012.
Planninq Application No. PA99-001 :~ - Conditional Use Permit for a
Winston Tire Store
(Plca3c rofcr to plans in Exhibit E) (Please see Attachment 6, Exhibits D, E, F & G)
This application is for the approval of a Conditional Use Permit to build and
operate a 5,310 square feet Winston Tire store with tire sales and installation, and
automotive service and repair.
This item was denied at the July 21, 1999 meeting. Based on statements made
by some members of the Commission it is our understanding that it was denied
because (paraphrasing statements made by some commissioners) "there are already
too many auto related uses on this street" and "1 thought we were going to have a more
pedestrian related use for this site". We feel these statements are vague, arbitrary and
simply do not address the City's own criteria for considering the suitability of a project
under consideration for a conditional use permit.
It should be noted that per the Development Code Table 17.08.030, page 59,
(copy attached, see Exhibit C) "Automobile service stations with or without an
automated car wash" is permitted without a conditional use permit. Certainly this is
much less pedestrian oriented than the use proposed in this application.
We feel that the best arguments in favor of this application are contained in the
Staff Report issued by the Planning Department-(-eepy- (See Attachment 6} :,:,t 9) . It
contains ahighly detailed analysis, based on the City's codes, as to why this project
meets all requirements that are relevant to the approval of this project. The essence of
the report is contained on page 4 under the heading "GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
CONSISTENCY - The project has been determined by the staff to be consistent
with the Community Commercial {CC) land use designation and the Community
Commercial (CC) zoning applicable to the property in the Temecula General Plan
and Development Code. Upon approval of the Development Plan revision and the
Conditional Use Permit as conditioned, the project will meet all of the guidelines
and standards for commercial development prescribed by the Development Code
and Design Guidelines'. (emphasis added by applicant)
Further, we feel that the project will offer Temecula's consumers an esthetically
pleasing facility that offers auto related services at highly competitive prices. It should
be noted that, Winston Tires has been operating a store in Temecula for about 10
years (currently located on Jefferson Ave.). This existing store will be closed when the
new store at Winchester Meadows is opened. Thus the approval of this project will not
be adding another store to the total already in the city, but simply replacing an old store
with a new facility.
One last point relates to the City's Development Code Chapter 17.04, section
17.04.010, item C,2, page 23 (copy attached, see Exhibit C). This states that "if the
conditional use permit involves a new building with less than 10,000 square feet, the
director of planning shall have the authority to approve, conditionally approve, or deny
an application for a conditional use permit". As stated previously, the building under
consideration is 5,310 square feet. Should this project have been submitted to the
Planning Commission in the first place? It is our opinion that it should not have been
submitted to the Planning Commission and that, in fact, its submittal is in direct conflict
with the Development Code.
In conclusion, we respectfully request that the Council approve this application
and base that approval upon the findings and recommendations of the Staff Report.
Please feel flee to call on us or our consultants at your convenience should you
wish to discuss this matter in further detail.
Sincerely,
Bob Cahan (Applicant)
Tom Davis (project architect)
Auto Service ~ Repair
July 29, 1999
The Mayor and Council Members
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
WINCHESTER MEADOWS SHOPPING CENTER
NEC WINCHESTER ROAD / MARGARITA ROAD
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
We recently learned that our application for a new Winston Tire Store at the above location was denied by your Planning
Commission on July 21, 1999.
We would genuinely hope that you would reconsider this decision, and in support of that would like to provide some
background on our previous association with Temecula.
First and of greatest importance is that we wish to continue doing business in your city. We first came to Temecula nearly 10
years ago, as one of your farst tire and automotive retail stores, and took over a closed, two-screen theatre location in
Winchester Square, located on the west side of Interstate 15 and anchored by Stater Brothers Market. We are currently near
the end of that lease and as the commercial area has both changed and moved to the east, we must relocate our store in order
to be successful in the market and to have a similar location to our competitors, most of whom have existing stores along
Winchester Road near our proposed new site.
Our proposed new location will feature our 1999 prototype, offering a more modern and convenient store for our customers in
Temecula. We feel we will be a very positive addition to the Winchester Meadows Shopping Center and would ask for your
support of our efforts.
Yours truly,
Oliver & Winston, Inc.
M~ic elle Peters
Lease Administrator
Winston Tire Company · 900 W. Alameda, Burbank, CA 91506 · (818) 972-1200 or (800) 289-7267 ° Fax (818) 954-9433
Exhibit C
CHAFFER 17.08
COMMERCIAL/OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS
SECTIONS:
17.08.010
17.08.020
17.08.030
17.08.040
17.08.050
17.08.060
17.08.070
17.08.080
Purpose and intent.
Description of commercial/office/industrial districts.
Use regulations.
Development standards.
Special use regulations and standards.
Landscape requirements and standards.
Commercial/office/industrial performance standards.
Environmental standards.
17.08.010 PURPOSE AND INTENT.
The following zoning districts are intended to provide regulations for the safe, efficient and creative design
of the commercial, office and industrial areas within the city. The zoning districts are intended to be
consistent with the land use designations that are described in the land use element of the Temecula general
plan. In certain situations several zoning districts are established to implement the goals and objectives of
the general plan.
The commercial/office/industrial zoning districts are intended to permit the range of industrial or
commercial uses in areas where uses are consistent with the general plan. It is further intended to
accomplish the following:
Provide for appropriate commercial areas to provide the city with a sound retail and industrial base
with employment opportunities for the commtmity.
To ensure compatibility of retail commercial and office uses with adjacent land uses and to
minimize traffic congestion and overloading of the city' s utility systems.
To encourage and assure that new commercial and industrial development will be planned in a
comprehensive manner with high standards of architecture, landscape and site design. (Oral. 95-16
§ 2 (par0)
17.08.020 DESCRIPTION OF COMMERCIAL/OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS.
The purpose and intent of the zoning districts are described as follows:
Neighborhood Commercial (NC). The neighborhood commercial designation includes smaller-scale
business activities which generally provide retail or convenience services for the local residents in
the surrounding neighborhood. Typical uses include traditional small food markets (floor area less
than twenty-five thousand square feet), drug stores, clothing stores, sporting goods, offices,
hardware stores, child care and community facilities.
B,
Community Commercial (CC). The community commercial designation includes retail,
professional office and service-oriented business activities which serve the entire community.
Community comanercial areas typically include some neighborhood cormnercial uses as well as
R:\DEVCODE\FINAL\TLM17 1.WPD 9/9/98
larger retail uses including department stores, theaters, restaurants, professional offices, specialty
""Y'~emil stores and shopping centers.
Highway/Tourist Commercial (HT). The highway commercial designation is intended to provide
for those uses that are located adjacent to major transportation routes or within convenient access
from freeway interchanges. Highway commercial development should be located near major
arterials, and developed as clusters of commercial development rather than permitted to extend
along the major streets. Typical uses may include tourist accommodations and lodging facilities,
automobile service stations, restaurants, convenience shopping, and food stores, and gift shops.
Service Commercial (SC). The service commercial designation is intended to provide for intensive
commercial uses and selected light manufacturing uses that typically require extensive floor area.
Typical uses include home improvement stores, discount retail stores, furniture stores, auto
dealerships and auto service and repair. Warehousing and light manufacturing may be permitted as
supporting uses for a business that is consistent with the service commercial designation.
Professional Office (PO). The professional office designation includes primarily single-tenant or
multi-tenant offices and may include supporting uses. The office developments are intended to
include low rise offices situated in a landscaped garden arrangement and may include mid-rise
structures at appropriate locations. Typical uses include legal, design, engineering or medical
offices, corporate and governmental offices, community facilities. Limited supporting convenience
retail and personal service (such as dry cleaners, barbers, shoe repair shop) commercial may be
permitted to serve the needs of the on-site employees. A maximum of fifteen percent of the total
square footage of the floor area shall be devoted to retail or personal service uses.
Business Park District (BP). It is the intent of the business park zoning designation to develop well
designed business and employment centers that include attractive and distinctive architectural
design, innovative site planning, and substantial landscaping and visual quality. Typical uses may
include administrative offices, research and development laboratories, custom made product
manufacturing, processing, assembling, packaging, and fabrication of goods, such as jewelry,
furniture, art objects, clothing, on-site wholesale of goods produced, and labor intensive
manufacturing, assembly, and repair processes which do not involve frequent truck traffic. Retail
uses are not permined in this zoning district except as supporting a principal business park use
(limited to fifteen percent (15 %) of the square footage of the development).
Light Industrial District (LI). It is the intent of the light industrial zoning designation to promote the
development of attractive comprehensively planned industrial uses that will help to provide the city
with a sound and diverse industrial base. This district allows for a wide variety of industrial uses
including manufacturing, compounding of materials, processing, assembling, packaging, treatment
or fabrication of materials, and products which require frequent truck activity or the transfer of
heavy or bulky items. Wholesaling, storage and warehousing within enclosed building, storage and
wholesale to retailers from the premises of f'mished goods and food products are also allowed. Also
included in this zoning district are the following uses; warehousing, freight handling, shipping,
truck services and terminals, storage and wholesaling from the premises of unrefmed raw or
semirefined products requiring further processing or manufacturing. Storage of raw or finished
materials may occur outside providing there is adequate screening from adjoining land use areas.
Standards are provided to protect adjoining uses from excessive noise, odor, smoke toxic materials,
and other potentially objectionable impacts. (Oral. 96-19 § 2(EE)(part); Ord. 95-16 § 2 (part); Ord
97-17 § 2(D))
R:\DEVCCDE\FiNILL\TLM17 I.WPD 9/9/98 klb 57
C
Description of Use
Automobilesales (brokerage)--showroom only (new and
used)--no outdoor display
Automobile repair services
Automobile rental
Automobile painting and body shop
Automobile salvage yards/impound yards
Automobile service stations with or without an automated
car wash
Automotive oil change/lube services with no major repairs
Automotive parts--sales
Automotive service stations selling beer and/or wine--with or
without an automated car wash
B
Bakery goods distribution
Bakery retail
Bakery wholesale
Banks and financial institutions
Barber and beauty shops
Bed and breakfast
Bicycle (sales, rentals, services)
Billiard parlor/poothall
Binding of books and similar publications
Blood bank
Blueprint and duplicating and copy services
Bookstores
Bowling alley
Building material sales (with exterior storage/sales areas
greater than 50 percent of total sales area)
Table 17.08.030
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Commercial/Office/Industrial Districts
C
C
C
I SC
P
P
P
C
P P P
- C' P P
P P P P
C1
P
CI
P P P
P P P
- C P
P P P
C C
P P
- p P
P P P
P P
PO
C
C1
BP ~ LI
- C
- p
- p
P
C
C P
P
- p
C1 C!
P P
P
P
P P
P P P .P
P P P P
- C -
P P
C
- p P
P P P P
P P P P
p - _ _
p - . _
P
P I
R:\DEVCCDE\FINAL\TLM!7 I.WPD 9/9/98
Use variations in the building footprints and facades. Such variations should be
proportional to the overall bulk of the buildings with variations being greater for
large buildings.
Use a variety of shapes and forms including architectural projections such as roof
overhangs, box windows, stairways, balconies, and cantilevers that create shadows
on the buildings.
Use conn-asting vertical and horizontal elements that help to break the visual mass
of the facade into smaller areas.
Divide the bulk of the roof into smaller areas to reduce the apparent scale of the
building and provide visual interest. The roof can be designed with varying heights
and slopes to contrast with a fiat roof.
Where the character or scale is identifiable, new development should be designed to
maintain that character and to be compatible with that scale. In areas where the character is
not identifiable, new development should be designed to be complementary or consistent
with desirable characteristics of the surrounding area in a way that contributes to the
establishment of a positive character and scale for the area through the use of similar or
complementary materials, colors, or building forms and design details.
Development should be designed to minimize detrimental impacts on surrounding
properties, including, but not limited to, visual, noise, air quality and other environmental
impacts. Strategies for minimizing the impacts include protecting residential areas adjacent
to commercial development through screening of circulation areas, loading areas and trash
collection points or other areas that could potentially be disruptive to the residential
character of the adjacent area.
C. Commercial Development Performance Standards.
1. Circulation.
Limit egress and ingress to commercial areas to common entrance points. Orient
most of the vehicular access from side streets rather than directly from major
arterial.
b,
Separate vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems should be provided if
possible. Pedestrian linkages between uses in the commercial areas should be
provided. In shopping centers, provide separate pedestrian walkways from parking
areas to the major commercial tenants. Whenever possible, parking lots should be
designed to separate vehicular circulation routes from parking aisles.
2. Architectural Design.
C
Large buildings should be designed in such a manner to avoid excessive mass and
bulk. This can be accomplished by dividing the building form, varying the height
of the roof structure and by creating offsets in the exterior walls.
R:\DEVCODE\FiNAL\TLM17_!.WpD 9/9/98 klb 8 0
C
b,
The lower floors of commercial structures should not have blank wails. Windows,
trellises, wall articulation, and entrances can provide relief along expansive wall
surfaces.
Upper portions of multistory com.mercial structures can be stepped-back to reduce
the bulk and mass of the buildings and to preserve pedestrian scale.
Site Planning and Design.
a,
Pedestrian amenities in commercial developments should be provided to enhance
the opportunities for pedestrian circulation and social activities. Strategies to
achieve this high degree of pedestrian orientation and activity include, but are not
limited to, the following:
Orient the design of the buildings to the scale of pedestrian. First floor
uses should be primarily retail commercial, restaurants, or public use
areas. Windows and door entrances should be located on the ground floor
to encourage pedestrian activity. Large expanses of uninterrupted wall
surfaces should not be permitted.
ii. Provide covered or enclosed walkways between the buildings on the site.
111.
Provide pedestrian plazas and sidewalks of sufficient width adjacent to
buildings along with amenities such as special lighting, interesting paving
materials, landscaping benches and other street furniture.
Whenever possible, new sumctures should be clustered. This creates plazas or
pedestrian malls instead of rows of commercial or ~Strip commercial." Separate
structures can be linked with arcades, trellis or clearly clef'reed walkway.
C,
Minimize conflicts between pedestrian and vehicular traffic as much as possible by
orienting pedestrian circulation areas parallel with the flow of traffic through the
parking areas.
do
Loading facilities shall not be located in front of structures without screening.
These facilities are most appropriately located at the rear of the structures where
screening can be minimal or not needed.
Open space areas should be concentrated or clustered into larger more meaningful
spaces at areas of significant activity, rather than dispersed into small areas of low
impact or on the periphery of the site.
Compatibility. When a commercial structure is located adjacent to a residential
neighborhood additional setbacks from the residentially zoned area shall be required.
Multistory buildings may be stepped back to preserve the scale of the adjacent low rise
StrucRlres.
Industrial Development Performance Standards.
1. Circulation.
R:\DEVCODE\FiNAL\TLM17 1.WPD 9/9/98 ~lb 8 1
CHAPTER 17.04
PERMITS
SECTIONS:
17.04.010
17.04.020
17.04.030
17.04.040
Conditional use permits.
Temporary. use permits.
Home occupation permits.
Variances.
17.04.010
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS.
Purpose and Intent. A conditional use permit is intended to allow the establishment of those uses
which have some special impact or uniqueness such that their effect on the surrounding
environment cannot be determined in advance of the use being proposed for a particular location.
The conditional use permit provides the city with the means to review the location, design,
configuration of uses, and potential impact and compatibility with the surrounding area.
No conditional use permit or permit granting a variance shall have any force or effect until the
applicant thereof actually receives such permit signed by the secretary of the planning commission
designating the conditions of its issue thereon, and executes his or her written consent to the
conditions imposed. No permit shall be issued until the time for filing an appeal from decisions of
the planning commission as provided in Section 17.03.090 has expired, or in the event of such
appeal, after the final determination thereof by the city council.
Application Requirements. Applications for conditional use permits shall be completed in
accordance with Section 17.03.030 of this development code.
C. Authority. Conditional use permits shall require a public hearing as follows:
If the conditional use permit involves an existing building, the director of planning shall
have the authority to approve, conditionally approve or deny an application for a
conditional use permit. Decisions of the director of planning may be appealed to the
Planning Commission, pursuant to Section 17.030.090.
If the conditional use permit involves a new building with less than 10,000 square feet, the
director of planning shall have the authority to approve, conditionally approve, or deny an
application for conditional use permit. Decisions of the director of planning may be
appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to Chapter 17.03.090.
,
If the conditional use permit involves a new building with 10,000 square feet or greater,
the Planning Commission shall have the authority to approve, conditionally approve, or
deny an application for conditional use permit. Decisions of the Planning Commission
may be appealed to the City Council, pursuant to Section 17.03.090.
Hearing and Notice. Upon the determination that a conditional use permit application is complete, a
public hearing shall be scheduled with the director of planning or the planning commission. Notice
of the time, date and place of public hearing shall be given as provided in Section 17.03.040 of this
code.
R:\DEVCODE\FINAL\TEM!7 1.WPD 9/9/98 klb 2 3
Findings. In considering applications for conditional use permits, the hearing body, with such
conditions as are deemed reasonable in approving or conditionally approving the use, shall find the
use will not jeopardize, adversely affect, endanger or otherwise constitute a menace to the public
health. safety. or general welfare.
To approve or conditionally approve a conditional use permit, the planning commission or
planning director (or planning commission and cirv council on appeal) must make the
following findings:
ao
The proposed conditional use is consistent with the general plan and the
development code.
The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and
development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed
conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures.
The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas,
landscaping, and other development features prescribed in this development code
and required by the platruing commission or council in order to integrate the use
with other uses in the neighborhood.
The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety
and general welfare of the community.
That the' decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a
conditional use permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a
whole before the planning commission or city council on appeal.
Conditions of approval imposed by the planning director, planning commission or city
council on appeal for a conditional use may involve any pertinent factors affecting the
establishment, operation or maintenance of the requested use.
Any conditional use permit granted or approved hereunder shall be approved or
conditionally approved with the city, and its planning commission and city council retaining
and reserving the right and jurisdiction to review and to modify such conditional use
permit--including the conditions of approval--based on changed circumstances. Changed
circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of the business, a change in
scope, emphasis, size, or nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration,
recon~guration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any conditional use
permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the city, its planning commission
and city council, is in addition to, and not in lieu of, the right of the city, its planning
commission and city council, to review and revoke or modify any conditional use permit
approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed
on such conditional use permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other
code violation thereon.
Notice of Decision. Notice of decision upon an application for a conditional use permit shall be in
accordance with Section 17.03.040(E) of this development code.
R:\SEVCCDE\FiNAL\T-2M17 i.W~D 9/9/98 kid 2~
Expiration of Conditional Use Permit. Within two years of approval of a conditional use permit,
commencement of use shall have occurred or the approval shall be subject to expiration.
Commencement of use shall be defined by the issuance of a building permit for conditional uses
involving new construction or the actual occupancy of an existing structure for a conditional use not
involving new construction. If after three years, the commencement of the use for which a
conditional use permit was issued has not occurred, the planning director may provide a notice to
the permit holder that the conditional use permit is subject to expiration and that a public hearing
before the planning commission will be held to determine whether or not the planning commission
shall determine that the conditional use permit expired. Notice of the hearing shall be given in
accordance with Section 17.03.040. The planning commission shall take evidence regarding what
use, if any, the permit holder has made of the conditional use permit and determine if such use is
significant to justify extending or continuing the conditional use permit. Additionally, if after
commencement of the use under the conditional use permit, the active use of the conditional use
permit is discontinued for a period of three years, then the conditional use permit shall be deemed
abandoned.
Time Extension. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the permittee may, prior to the expiration of the
conditional use permit, apply for up to three one-year extensions of time in which to use the plot
plan. Each extension of time shall be granted in one-year increments only.
An application for an extension of time shall be made to the planning director, on forms provided
by the planning department and shall be filed with the planning department, accompanied by the
appropriate filing fee. Within thirty days following the filing of an application for an extension of
time, the planning director may approve, conditionally approve or deny the application. An
extension of time may be granted by the planrang director only upon a determination that the
property and use are consistent with the general plan, land use ordinance, and all other city
ordirances and regulations. If an extension is granted, the total time allowed for use of the approval
shall not exceed a period of five years, calculated from the effective date of the approval.
Any conditional use permit which is not used within the time specified in the grant of approval, or,
if no time is specified, within one year of the effective date of such approval, shall become subject
to termination. The planning commission may extend such approval for a period not to exceed one
vear. Provided an application requesting the extension is filed prior to the original expiration date.
For purposes of this section, "used" means the commencement of construction activity or any
activity authorized by the grant of approval or conditional approval.
Any proceeding to enforce the expiration of any conditional use permit or variance granted
hereunder shall commence with notice to the permit holder of the ciry's intent to enforce the same
and following the hearing requirements of the following paragraph.
Before the city council considers termination or revocation of any zoning permit, conditional use
permit. or variance, the planning commission shall hold a hearing thereon after giving written
notice thereof to the permit holder at least ten days in advance of such hearing. With five days
thereafter the planning commission shall transmit a report of its findings and its recommendations
on the termination or revocation to the city council.
The term "use" shall mean the beginning of a substantial construction of the use that is authorized,
which construction must thereafter be pursued diligently to completion, or the actual occupancy of
existing buildings or land under terms of the authorized use.
~.:,,2E'/CZSE\FZNA. L\TE.v:Z7 Z.;.,/PO 5/9/98 kL~ 25
Reservation of Right to Review Conditional Use Permit. Any conditional use permit granted or
approved hereunder, shall be approved or conditionally approved with the city, and its planning
director, planning commission, and city council retaining and reserving the right and jurisdiction to
review and modify such conditional use permit (including the conditions of approval) based on
changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include. but are not limited to the modification of
the business, a change in scope, emphasis, size or nature of the business, and the expansion.
alteration, recon~guration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any conditional use
permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the city, its planning director,
planning commission, and city council is in addition to, and not lieu of, the right of the city, its
director of planning, planning commission, and city council to review and revoke or modify any
conditional use permit. approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the
conditions imposed on such conditional use permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition
or other code violation thereon. (Oral. 96-19 §§ 2(I) and (J); Ord. 95-16 § 2 (part); Oral. 97-17 § 7)
17.04.020 TEMPORARY USE PERMITS.
Purpose and Intent. The temporary use permit allows for short-term activities, typically less than
one year in duration, which may be appropriate when regulated.
Permitted Uses. The following temporary uses may be permitted, subject to the issuance of a
temporary use permit:
1. Real estate offices and model homes within approved development projects.
Outdoor display and sales of merchandise within commercial land use districts, limited to
two events per calendar year, not exceeding four consecutive days, including only
merchandise customarily sold on the premises by a permanently established business.
On- and off-site contractors' construction yards in conjunction with an approved active
development project.
Trailer, coach or mobile home as a temporary residence of the property owner when a
valid residential building permit is in force. The permit may be granted for up to one
hundred eighty days, or upon expiration of the building permit, whichever first occurs.
Christmas tree sale lots, however, a permit shall not be required when such sale is in
conjunction with an established commercial business holding a valid business license,
provided such activity shall be only held from November ist through December 31st.
Fairs, festivals and concerts, when not held within premises designed to accommodate such
events, such as auditoriums, stadiums, or other public assembly facilities.
7. Emergency public health and safety needs including emergency clinics, temporary
inoculation centers.
8. Pumpkin sales lots.
Sidewalk sale and vendor stands.
Flower sales.
R:\ZZ'.'222E\FiNAL\TEM:? I.N~D 919198
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE BUSINESSES LOCATIONS
ALONG WINCHESTER ROAD
F:\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP~12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
38
CITY OF TEMECULA
~Winston Tires
Rockwater Car Wash
America's Tire Co.
Texaco/Express Lube
Goodyear Tire
Big'O Tires
Chevron Gas Station
ATTACHMENT 5 Auto Service and Repair Business
CASE NO. - Planning Application No. PA99-0236 (Development Plan Revision - Appeal)
- Planning Application No. PA99-0012 (Condition Use Permit - Appeal)
CITY COUNCIL DATE - September 14, 1999
I'll
,!
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0236 AND PA99-0012
STAFF REPORT AND EXHIBITS
TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION DATED JULY 21, 1999
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
39
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
July 21, 1999
PA99-0236 (Development Plan, Revision) and
Planning Application PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit)
Prepared By:
Thomas K. Thornsley, Project Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Community Development Department - Planning Division
recommends the Planning Commission:
ADOPT Resolution No. 99-__ approving Planning
Application No. PA99-0236 (Development Plan, Revision)
based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained
therein.
o
ADOPT Resolution No. 99- approving Planning
Application No. PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit) based
on the findings and subject to the conditions contained
therein.
,
ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No.
PA99-0236 (Development Plan Revision) and PA99-0012
(Conditional Use Permit) pursuant to Section 15332 of the
CEQA Guidelines.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Fred Stephenson
PROPOSAL:
Planning Application No. PA99-0236 is a request to
reconfigure a portion of the Winchester Meadows
Shopping Center by incorporating the abandoned
well site and relocating and enlarging two
undeveloped pad sites.
Planning Application No. PA99-0012 is a proposal to
build and operate a 5,310 square foot tire store with
sales and installation, automotive service and repair
facility.
LOCATION:
Located on the northeast corner of Margarita Road and
Winchester Road (Winchester Meadows Shopping Center).
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Site CC (Community Commercial)
EXISTING ZONING:
Site CC (Community Commercial)
R:\STAFFRPT~12pa99.doc 1
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North: PI (Public Institutional)
South: CC (Community Commercial)
East: SPol (Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan)
West: CC (Community Commercial)
EXISTING LAND USE:
Shopping Center
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North: Chaparral High School
South: McDonald's/Costco
East: Lowe's Hardware (under construction)
West: Ralph's
PROJECT STATISTICS
Winchester Meadows Shoppincl Center
Total Area Gross: 666,468 square feet
Oriclinally Revised
15.3 acres 15.5 acres
Winston Tire Store
Total Project Area Net: 30,430 square feet .7 acre
Total Building Area 5,310 square feet 17 %
Landscape Area: 11,089 square feet 37 %
Paved Area: 13,056 square feet 43 %
Hardscape: 975 square feet 3 %
Parking Required:
4 parking spaces per service bay
24 spaces
Parking Provided:
25 spaces
Building Height: 24 feet
BACKGROUND
The Winchester Meadows Shopping Center with Ralph's Groceries was approved by the Planning
Commission under Planning Application No. PA97-0305. At that time there was a well site on the
corner of the site at Winchester and Margarita Roads. The well site was abandoned by Rancho
California Water District and was acquired by the center developer. With the addition of this
property the developer has requested to incorporate this area into the overall site.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Planning Application No. PA99-0236 (Development Plan, Revision) and PA99-0012 (Conditional
Use Permit), are located in the Winchester Meadows Shopping Center on the northeast corner of
Winchester and Margarita Roads. The revisions to the original site plan (Planning Application No.
PA97-0305) allows the developer enlarge the shopping center by .2 acres by including the abandon
well site and reconfiguring the size and location of Pads 'B' and Pad 'C' (See Exhibits D & E). Both
pads will now front onto Winchester Road providing greater exposure to the future tenants, allowing
for larger tenant spaces, and a providing a better site layout for traffic flow.
Concurrently with the site plan revisions: Planning Application No. PA99-0012 (Conditional Use
Permit) is a proposal to build and operate a 5,310 square foot Winston Tire Store for tire sales and
installation, with additional automotive service and repair on Pad 'B'. This pad is .7 acres and is
located at the corner of Winchester and Margarita Roads (See Site Plan Exhibits F).
R:\STAFFRPTH 2pa99.doc 2
ANALYSIS
Site Desjan and Circulation
The layout of the two pad sites, Pads 'B' and 'C' fronts both onto Winchester Road and provides
associated parking with full circulation movements around all parking spaces. The main driving
aisle running parallel to Winchester Road provides access to both sites from the driveway entries
off of Winchester and Margarita Roads. Neither pad will have direct access to the abutting roads.
Pad 'B' is designed to accommodate a Winston Tire store with the building backing up to Margarita
Road so that the service bays are oriented to face into the property to limit their view for the public
right-of-way. A screen wall and a landscaping berm will be installed to provide screening of the
service bays from the public right-of-way, as required by the Design Guidelines (See Exhibits G),
The office and customer entrance to the store face Winchester Road. Vehicle access to the store
in provided by a looped drive aisle that will circulate past three rows of parking located in front of
the service bays
Pad 'C' is tentatively designed to accommodate a drive-thru restaurant and appears to have proper
circulation to and through the site. A full review of this site will be assessed when an application
is presented to the Planning Department.
Parkinq Analysis
With the inclusion of the well site property the overall site is enlarged with larger buildings and more
parking. The Winston Tire store needs to provide 24 parking spaces and has provided 25 parking
spaces. If Pad 'C' remains a proposed drive-thru restaurant, as shown. it would require 28 parking
space and has provide 32 parking spaces. The changes to these two pad sites the remainder of
the shopping center is unchanged.
Architecture & Colors
The building for Winston Tire is a rectangular building measuring 118 feet by 45. On the right two
thirds of the building, facing the parking lot, will be six service bays with roll-up doors and the sales
with the customer entrance on the left (See Exhibits H). From Winchester Road the public will see
into the sales area with its glass front and stucco columns supporting the arched parapet wall rising
to maximum height of 24 feet above over the ground. Along Margarita Road the building will repeat
the Winchester Road elevation flanked with stucco finished walls capped with a cornice. The colors
of the stucco walls will be off whites and sandstone beiges with accenting colors in shades of
green. The building is consistent with the architecture and colors of the shopping center.
Landscapinq
Thirty-seven percent (37%) of the Winston site has been landscaped which far exceeds the twenty
percent minimum landscaping requirement in the CC (Community Commercial) zone. This site
fronts two streets, which require twenty-five to thirty feet of landscaping. Along Margarita Road will
be California Pepper and Purple Leaf Plum trees and along Winchester will be African Sumac. At
the base of the building will be a mix of scrubs and flowering plants surrounded by ground cover
(star Jasmine), and tuff. Landscaping and a seating court are provided at the front of the building
as part of an outside waiting area for customer. A six foot tall with three feet of mounding and
dense landscaping will be installed along Winchester Road to screen the view into the service bays
(See Exhibits l).
R:\STAFFRPT\I 2pa99.doc 3
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
These projects are categorically exempt under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Guidelines Section 15332 (In-fill Development Projects) and a Notice of Exemption has been
prepared for Planning Applications No. PA99-0012 and PA99-0236.
Section 15332 applies to in-fill development projects on sites that: are less than five (5) acres and
substantially surrounded by urban uses; consistent with the applicable general plan designation and
all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning; have no value as habitat for
endangered, rare or threatened species; and that can be adequately served by all required utilities
and public services.
The affected area of the site expansion and development meets all of the criteria noted above, and
therefore the proposed project is eligible for a CEQA exemption pursuant to Section 15332 of the
CEQA Guidelines.
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY
The project is consistent with the Community Commercial (CC) land use designation and the
Community Commercial (CC) zoning applicable to the property in the Temecula General Plan and
Development Code. Upon approval of the Development Plan Revision and the Conditional Use
Permit as conditioned, the project will meet all of the guidelines and standards for commercial
development prescribed by the Development Code and Design Guidelines.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The project has been determined by staff to be consistent with applicable City policies, standards
and guidelines. We believe it is compatible with the nature and quality of surrounding development,
and will represent an attractive, functional and economic addition to the City's commercial and
employment base.
FINDINGS - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The proposal, a commercial automotive service business, is consistent with the land use
designation and policies reflected in the Community Commercial (CC) land use standards
in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for Community
Commercial (CC) development contained in the City's Development Code. The site is
therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and
density of commercial development proposed. The project as conditioned is also consistent
with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines,, Ordinance No. 655
(Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions,
and fire and building codes.
The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other
associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and
safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as
conditioned has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines,
standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and
function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare.
R:\STAFFRPT\I 2pa99.doc 4
The design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental
damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There are
no fish, wildlife or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish, wildlife
or habitat off-site. The site is surrounded by development and is an infill site. Furthermore,
grading has already occurred at the site, which is a portion of a larger industrial park. The
project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as
defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code.
FINDINGS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
,
,
,
The proposal, a conditional use permit for a commercial automotive service business, is
consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected in the Community
Commercial (CC) land use standards in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the
development standards for Community Commercial (CC) development contained in the
City's Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to
be physically suitable for the type and density of commercial development proposed. The
project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and
local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide
Design Guidelines,, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's
Water Efficient Landscaping provisions, and fire and building codes.
The overall design of the project, is compatible with the nature, condition, and development
of adjacent uses, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site
improvements and will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. The
project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has been found to be consistent with,
all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the
development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent the adjacent uses,
buildings, or structures.
The site of this proposed conditional use is an in-fill site of an approved development plan.
The development of this site adequate in size and shape to accommodate the building while
meeting the yard, parking and loading, landscaping, and other development features
prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission in order to
integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood.
The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and
general welfare of the community. Base on the type of use as proposed and as
conditioned, will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the
community
The decision to approve the application for a conditional use permit is based on substantial
evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission at the time of
their decision. This application has been brought before the Planning Commission at a
Public Hearing where members of the community have had a opportunity to be heard on
this matter before the Commission renders their decision.
R:\STAFFRPT\12pa99.doc 5
Attachments:
1.
o
o
PC Resolution o Blue Page 7
Exhibit A. Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 10
PC Resolution - Blue Page 13
Exhibit A. Conditions of Approval o Blue Page 17
Exhibit B. Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 28
Exhibits - Blue Page 31
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
Vicinity Map
Zoning Map
General Plan
Original Site Plan (PA97-0305)
Revised Site Plan (PA99-0236)
Winston Tire Site Plan
Line of Sight Study
Elevation
Landscape Plan
Floor Plans
R:\STAFFRPT\12pa99.doc 6
CITY OF TEMECULA
.AS
CALIFORNIA o ROAD
% S~ACO RO~D
TO SAN DIEGO
VICINITY MAP
NO SCALE
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0236 (Development Plan Revision)
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit)
EXHIBIT A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - July 21, 1999
VICINITY MAP
R:\STAFFRPT\I 2pa99.Coc 32
CITY OF TEMECULA
EXHIBIT B
DESIGNATION - CC (Community Commercial)
·
'~.
BP
SC
SC
sct"", '
D o. /
CC
C
BP
ZONING MAP
LM
EXHIBIT C
DESIGNATION - CC (Community Commercial)
GENERAL PLAN
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0236 (Development Plan, Revision)
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit)
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - July 21, 1999
R:\STAFFRPT\I 2pagg.doc 33
CITY OF TEMECULA
WINCHESTER MEADOWS SITE PLAN
(AS APPROVED 12115/97, PA 97-0305)
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0236 (Development Plan, Revision)
EXHIBIT D
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - July 21, 1999
ORIGINAL SITE PLAN
(PA97-0305)
R:',STAFFRPT\I 2pa99.doc 34
CITY OF TEMECULA
.?' /
REVISED WINCHESTER MEADOWS SITE PLAN
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0236 (Development Plan, Revision)
EXHIBIT E
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - July 21, 1999
REVISED SITE PLAN
(PA99-0236)
R:',STAFFRPT\I 2pa99.doc 35
CITY OF TEMECULA
WINCHESTER ROAD
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit)
EXHIBIT F
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE -July 21, 1999
WINSTON TIRE SITE PLAN
R:~.STAFFRPT\I 2Da99.doc 36
CITY OF TEMECULA
WINSTON. TIRE STORE
LINE OF SIGHT STUDY - LOOKING NORTHWEST FROM WINCHESTER AVE
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit)
EXHIBIT G
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - July 21, 1999
LINE OF SIGHT STUDY
R:\STAFFRP'R12pa99.doc 37
CITY OF TEMECULA
SOUTH
'.~ I I'f '
,,, ,~ ,,,~ ~!.~
NORTH
WEST
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit)
EXHIBIT H
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - July 21, 1999
ELEVATIONS
R:\STAFFRPT\I 2pa99.doc 38
CITY OF TEMECULA
u
LAN~A~ .f.~I~TIC~I Tt..E .5~ A5
Al~ I~IHINAI~'Y ~ DA'TED IO/'~4/ql.
FU'I'UI~E
PAP 'C,'
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit)
EXHIBIT I
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - July 21, 1999
LANDSCAPE PLAN
R:t, STAFFRPT\I 2pa99.doc 39
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0012 (Conditional Use Permit)
EXHIBIT J
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - July 21, 1999
FLOOR PLANS
R :\STAFFRPT\I 2pa99.doc 40
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
DRAFT MINUTES OF JULY 21, 1999, PLANNING COMMISSION
\\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R12pa99 CC Appl rev.doc
40
DRAFT
PlanComm/minutes/072199
MOTION: Commissioner Webster moved to approve staff's recommendation to approve
the project, as is; and request staff to add additional language to address future murals
in order to address the Commissioners' concern with respect to setting a precedence.
Commissioner Fahey seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the
exception of Commissioners Mathewson and Naggar who voted n_9.
(The previous discussed Agenda Item No. 6 was reopened and voice vote was
taken again. See page 6.)
7. Home Depot Workshop
This Agenda Item was heard after Agenda Item No. 8. (See page 7.)
PUBLIC HEARING
Plannincl Application No. PA99-0236 (Site Plan Revision) and PA99-0012
(Conditional Use Permit).
Request to change the site plan configuration of the shopping center to
include the abandon well site and enlarge tow lots for future development.
The application is a proposal to build and operate 5,310 square foot tier
sales and installation, automotive service and repair facility.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning
Commission approve the request.
By way of overheads, Project Planner Thornsley presented a detailed overview of the
staff report (of record); highlighted site design, noting that a landscape berm would be
installed for provision of screening the service bays; presented the line-of-sight diagram
for provision of the view from Winchester Road (denoted on Exhibit G per agenda
material); noted that the 37% landscape plan far exceeds the 20% requirement;
confirmed that this site is zoned Community Commercial (CC); and for Commissioner
Mathewson, clarified the rationale for bringing this matter before the Commission,
specifying the proposed uses on this particular site.
For Commissioner Mathewson, Planning Manager Ubnoske advised that staff typically
does not take into account the number of existing similar uses in the area.
The applicant's representative relayed that he was available for Commission questions
and comments.
Chairman Guerriero closed the public hearing at this time.
Regarding the Conditional Use Permit, Commissioner Webster cited Finding No. 2
(denoted on page 5 of the staff report) regarding compatibility; and relayed that it was his
DRAFT
DRAFT
PlanComm/minutes1072199
opinion that this particular use would not be compatible at this site in this Community
Commercial zoning area; and expressed his preference for maintaining this type of use
in Service Commercial areas, or with a conditional approval within Highway Tourist
Commercial areas, or within the Light Industrial areas.
Concurring with Commissioner Webster's comments, Commissioner Fahey relayed that
it was her opinion that due to the need to screen the service bay areas of this particular
project on this predominant corner intersection that this contributed to a determination
that this project would be an inappropriate use for this particular site.
For Commissioner Mathewson, Senior Planner Fagan reiterated staff's finding of
consistency, referencing the agenda material.
Commissioner Mathewson and Chairman Guerriero relayed concurrence with the
previous Commission comments.
MOTION: Commissioner Webster moved to deny the proposed project; and for the
record clarified that the denial is based upon the incompatibility of the described use on
the site and with the adjacent uses, and that the project does not comply with the goals
of the General Plan, specifically, the community design element; and that the denial is
not based upon the number of other similar uses in that area. Commissioner Fahey
seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. (Denied: 5/0)
At 6:57 P.M. a short recess was taken, and the meeting reconvened at 7:06 P.M.
Regarding Agenda Item No. 6, Chairman Guerriero relayed that due to the additional
discussion surrounding the motion, he misunderstood the final amended motion
presented for Agenda Item No. 6.
MOTION: Chairman Guerriero moved to reopen Agenda Item No. 6. Commissioner
Naggar seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of
Commissioner Fahey who voted n._9.
At this time the meeting continued back to Agenda Item No. 6.
e
On The Border PA99-0079-Proposed Mural
Attorney Curley provided additional information regarding reopening this matter and the
privilege granted to correct the affirmative vote; provided clarification regarding the final
motion made by Commissioner Webster; and voice vote was taken again, as follows:
MOTION: Commissioner Webster moved to approve staff's recommendation to approve
the project, as is; and request staff to add additional language to address future murals
in order to address the Commissioners' concern with respect to setting a precedence.
Commissioner Fahey seconded the motion and voice vote reflected denial due to
Commissioners Guerriero's, Mathewson's, and Naggar's votes of no. (Denied: 3~2)
DRAFT
ITEM 25
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Manager/City Council r~
James O'Grady, Assistant City Manag
September 14, 1999
SUBJECT:
Consideration of the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival
Sponsorship Request
Prepared by: Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator
RECOMMENDATION: 1) That the City Council review and approve
funding for the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival in the amount of $30,000.
2) That the City Council approve the sponsorship agreement with the Temecula
Valley Balloon & Wine Festival organization and authorize the Mayor to execute the
agreement.
DISCUSSION: Staff has received the annual sponsorship request for the
Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival. Staffs funding recommendation for this event
contained the same level as last year with the understanding that once the operating
budget was approved, the organization would have the opportunity to meet with the
Economic Development Sub-committee, Councilmembers Jeff Comerchero and Ron
Roberts, to discuss their funding. A meeting was held on Thursday, July 22, 1999. At
that time representatives from the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival Association
provided information to the subcommittee to review.
Since 1983, the Balloon & Wine Festival has been a community tradition in the
Temecula Valley region. This family event has proven to be very effective in getting
exposure both on a local and national level. The event increases tourism revenue for
the City's restaurants, hotels, shopping centers and wineries. In addition, residents and
visitors look forward to attending this popular event each year.
Due to the fact that the event promotes toudsm in Temecula, funding would come from
the General Fund's budget. There will be no commissions paid to any party for the City
of Temecula's sponsorships.
Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival
Staff has received the sponsorship request in the amount of $35,000 for Premier
Sponsor of the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival, which is attached for your
review. Council approved $35,000 for the '99 Festival with $5,000 to be repaid to the
City for an outstanding loan resulting in a net event payment of $30,000. The
Association reported that they have paid off all of their past debts.
Staff budgeted $30,000 for this event in the City's FY 1999-00 operating budget. The
Economic Development Sub-committee funding recommendation is for $30,000. The
Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival Association will provide an independent
certified public accountant audit of their financial statements and will submit it to the City
by December 30, 1999. This is consistent with the financial audits and reviews
requested of the other Economic Development non-profit groups the City funds. The
City plans to request this financial information every 2 - 3 years.
The '2000 Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival will be celebrating its 17-year
anniversary, June 9 - 11, 2000 at Lake Skinner. The Fdday evening event will be
determined by the Board of Directors at a later date.
The '99 Festival drew an estimated attendance of 37,000 spectators over the weekend.
The 1999 media outreach included pdnt, theater, radio and a promotional partnership
arranged with Vons stores in conjunction with KABC Radio.
Radio Advertising and Promotions: KABC/KLOS, KATY, KWRP, KFRG, and KOLA
were designated media sponsors for the event and participated with promotional and
paid spots, contests and live broadcasts. KABC Radio and Vons markets partnered in a
promotion that resulted in both store tie-ins and product sponsorships, plus a successful
on-air promotion for an Intimate Weekend Getaway in Temecula for listeners of the
KABC Restaurant Show.
Public service announcements were wdtten and submitted to radio and television
stations throughout Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bemardino and San Diego
Counties.
Out-of-area pdnt advertising consisted of the Los Angeles Times, San Diego Union
Tdbune, San Bemardino Sun and the Orange County Register. Local advertising
included The Press-Enterprise and advertising in The Califomian/North County Times
one week pdor the Festival.
A sampling of newspaper and magazine coverage consisted of The Press-Enterprise,
The Califomian/North County Times, Rancho News, San Diego Union Tdbune,
Pasadena Star News, Desert Sun, Inland Entertainment Round-Up, Neighbors, Vineyard
Press and the Inland Empire Magazine.
Pdnted materials produced by the Festival included 20,000 bill stuffers, 40,000 counter
flyers and 750 window posters. The Cadsbad Chamber of Commerce inserted a Festival
flyer into its newsletter of 2,700 the month prior to the event. A promotion was
coordinated with Edwards Theaters in Temecula to promote the Festival with on-screen
advertising starting two weeks before the event.
A draft of the 2000 Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival marketing/advertising
campaign can be reviewed in Attachment 2.
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds have been included in the FY 1999-00
Operating Budget (Economic Development line item, account #001-111-999-5264) for
the recommended sponsorship amount.
Sponsorship payment for the Temecula Balloon & Wine Festival will be paid as soon as
possible following the execution of the documents. The Balloon & Wine Festival
agreement is substantially in the final form but may be revised before being executed.
Should the City Council decide to increase this funding level beyond the recommended
amount, an additional appropriation would be required from the Unreserved General
Fund balance.
ATTACHMENT:
Attachment A- Sponsorship Package
Attachment B - 2000 Festival Marketing/Advertising Campaign
Attachment C- 1999 Festival Media/Promotions Recap
Attachment D - BudgetJFinancial Statement
Attachment E - Sponsorship Agreement
ATTACHMENT A - SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT
The Mission of the ]~mccula Valley Balloon & Wine
Festival Association is to enhance the charitable,
cultural, educational and economic development
of the region."
FI~.s T ~ v AL
,4 ,\t'll-/ll't!/il Cr,lfH~t~I[ll)tI
2000 Temecula Vafiey Bafioon and Wine Festival
Premier Sponsor $35,000
(Only one Premier Sponsorship available)
2.
3.
4.
5.
=
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Identification as Premier Sponsor in all Festival materials
Exclusivity in Premier Sponsor's field
Inclusion of logo in all Festival print advertising
Mention in all Festival paid radio and newspaper advertising
Sponsor representative interviewed on projected radio remote
broadcast
Right to use Festival logo on Premier Sponsor's materials
(with Festival advance approval)
Full page, black-and-white ad in Festival program
Representative introduced from stage and invited to speak
several times during Festival
Four signs or banners on-site at event (Sponsor to provide)
Separate display tent in high-traffic area
Access to VIP Hospitality Tent for nineteen guests
Linking of Premier sponsor's web site to Festival site
Mention in Festival newsletter
Mention in at least ten Festival news releases to general media
Sponsor's logo on table tents displayed in participating area
restaurants and other retail establishments
Sponsor's logo in Festival brochure
Forty adult Festival tickets
Twenty parking passes
Invitation to Sponsor Appreciation Dinner for twelve people
Twenty-five sets of Official Festival souvenir merchandise
Street, N/HIe 2()4 · 7~'nn'c'nla. C~d!'lin'n/a 92590 · r9()9) 6'(> 6'~1.3 ·/909/676-5921 l.~t.v
ATTACHMENT B - 2000 FESTIVAL MARKETING/ADVERTISING CAMPAIGN
Tbc Mission of tbc Temccula Valley Balloon & Wine
Festival Association is to enhance the charitable,
cultural, educational and economic development
of the region."
F2EI~I1VAL
TEMECULA VAI.LEY BALLOON AND WINE FESTIVAL
MARKETING PLAN 2000
The Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival, (herein after referred to as
"Festival") is orchestrating a comprehensive marketing, promotional and
publicity campaign designed to attract visitors to the 2000 event, set for June 9,
10 and 11 at beautiful Lake Skinner Recreation Area.
Because the name "Temecula" is an integral part of the event rifle, all marketing
of this regional entertainment event naturally promotes the city as well. The
event campaign also puts both in the spotlight, highlighting Temecula's
location, history and amenities along with event-specific information.
Elements in the campaign include, but are not limited to:
More than 150 local, regional and national corporations and businesses, will
receive information packages inviting sponsorship of the 2000 event, with
personal follow up calls made to each and meetings being held on an ongoing
basis.
Companies who we worked with in the past for promotional marketing tie-ins
will be approached again. They include United Airlines, Coca-Cola, Vons,
Budweiser and Target Stores. These affdiations will promote the Temecula
name through in-store displays, advertising and other promotions.
Shopping centers such as The Promenade, Prime Outlet Center, Ontario Mills,
North County Fair, Horton Plaza and other high-traffic centers will be
approached to assist in promotions, including displays of posters, flyer
distribution and ticket ou~ets.
Local business such as Rancho Steak House, Rancho Ford Lincoln Mercury,
The Corral and others will be contacted to sponsor and display cold air
balloons promoting the Festival.
2'9/9.1C/7~'1:~{Hz ',lru<'l. '~'ltl'lc 20 t · 7~'HR'C'tI/~I. Ccl/(/brllzel <)25<)(~ ,, 1<)09~ (~ 23 071.3 · (909) 67() 'T92l t'~1,\'
An estimated 20,000 plus billing stuffers will be offered to local business
through the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce mailing list.
Edwards Theatres will be approached again to promote the Festival with an
on-screen slide on all screens starting two weeks before the event.
A promotional partnership with Vons is currently be negotiated. This
promotion will include in store banners, signs and aisle displays in 240 stores in
Southern California, from Santa Barbara to the Mexican border.
A media distribution list of more than 350 print and broadcast representatives
will be receiving a continuing flow of press materials and personal follow-up
between now and the Festival date. All media outlets will be provided with
stories, photographs, interview opportunities and information that will result in
maximum news coverage of the event. The media list includes a broad
spectrum of entertainment editors, travel publications and editors, food and
wine publications and editors, ballooning publications and more.
Selected media representatives will be invited to Temecula on an individual
basis for media preview days in March or April, given tours of Temecula.
recreation, business, industrial and residential areas, and hot air balloon rides.
Media and marketing materials distributed throughout Southern California will
encourage visits to the Festival website, which links to the City of Temecula's.
Information about the event is being placed on an extensive list of other
internet sites, including festival and event calendars, travel sites, wine and
ballooning sites, and music and entertainment sites.
Riverside, San Diego and Los Angeles morning television shows and interview
programs are being contacted about scheduling on-site programs and event
news coverage. Radio stations throughout Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside and
San Diego counties will be contacted for interview and promotional
oppommities.
Media outlets will be contacted including Riverside Press-Enterprise, San Diego
Union Tribune, The Californian and North County Times, Inland
Entertainment Round-Up, The Entertainer, Bargain Bulletin, Penny Saver,
Media One Cablevision, television stations and radio stations KFRG/KXFG,
KATY, KWRP, KGGI, KABC, KFI and KIFM. Media such as the Los
Angeles Times, and Orange County Register are being contacted for
sponsorship participation and/or discounted non-profit ad rates.
On behalf of the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival negotiations with
all media to maximize the impact of the Festival's advertising budget, now
estimated at $114,000.00. Media promotions as described can more than
quadruple the value of this budget. In addition, co-op advertising programs
with radio stations have the potential to bring significant advertising benefits to
the Festival and the City.
A public service campaign to promote the Festival and Temecula, is planned to
utilize the free air time made available on broadcast stations to non-profit
organizations and events. Radio and television public service spots will be
produced and distributed throughout Southern California.
ATTACHMENT C - !999 FESTIVAL MEDIA/PROMOTIONS RECAP
Cooper Communications, Inc.
Marketing / Public Relations
5350 Topanga Canyon Blvd.
Woodland Hills, CA 91364-1718
Telephone (818) 348-8030
FAX (818) 348-8230
1999 Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival
Event Promotion and Publicity Summary
Printed Materials
1. The following printed materials were produced:
· 20,000 Bill Stuffers
· 40,000 Counter Flyers (8-1/2 x 11 ',)
· 750 Window Posters (11 x 17")
One component of the distribution was a mailing to the members of the
Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce, offering them materials to
promote the Festival to their own customers. In response to this mailing,
requests were received for 18,010 bill stuffers (the Bank of Commerce
alone distributed 15,000 stuffers in their monthly statements), 15,300
flyers and 155 posters.
The Carlsbad Chamber of Commerce inserted a Festival flyer into its
newsletter mailing of 2,700 the month prior to the event.
Newsletters
Two Festival newsletters were distributed to media and to its own mailing list of
approximately 90 each time.
Edwards Theatres
A promotion was coordinated with Edwards Theatres in Temecula to promote the
Festival with an on-screen slide on all nine screens starting two weeks before the
event.
Vons Stores
A promotional partnership was arranged with Vons stores in conjunction with
KABC Radio. This promotion included banners, signs and aisle displays in Vons'
240 stores in Southern California, from Santa Barbara to the Mexican border.
Banners were up the month of April and the first of May. The promotion included
offering a $2 ticket discount with a Vons Club card; selected Riverside County
stores also sold tickets. The Festival was promoted in the Vons circular
distributed to households throughout Southern California the week of April 21.
Print Advertising
Print advertising was placed in the Riverside Press Enterprise, the
Californian/North County Times, San Diego Union Tribune, Orange
County Register, Los Angeles Times-San Gabriel/Inland Empire edition,
San Bernardino Sun, OC Weekly and LA Weekly,
The Press Enterprise provided a significant schedule in trade space in
exchange for being named the exclusive metropolitan newspaper media
sponsor. The ad schedule was concentrated in the 10 days prior to the
event, with six 3xl 3" ads and seven 2x7" ads. Additionally, the paper
created a 4-color glossy Festival insert that was distributed the week
before the event in selected zones,
Trade space was also negotiated with The Californian/North County
Times· Ads appeared in The Californian and all zones of the North
County Times, including Oceanside, Vista, Cadsbad, Encinitas, San
Marcos, Fallbrook, Escondido, and Poway, the week before the Festival.
4. Paid advertising also included:
· San Diego Union Tribune Night & Day Section: April 21
· Los Angeles Times San Gabriel Valley Dining & Entertainment Guide:
April 23, 30
· Los Angeles Times Inland Empire Our Times section: April 29
· San Bernardino Sun Friday Weekend sections on April 23, 30
· Orange County Register Show Section, April 25, and Show Weekend,
April 30
· OC Weekly:. April 22, 29
· LA Weekly:. April 22, 29
2
Print Promotions
Promotional relationships were established that provided free editorial
space or ads with publications such as Inland Entertainment Round-Up,
Neighbors and Vineyard Press.
The Festival secured a two-color insert in the June edition of Inland
Empire Magazine thanking Festival sponsors.
Radio Advertising and Promotions
The following radio stations were designated media sponsors for the event and
participated with promotional spots, contests, live broadcasts, paid spots or a
combination of all during the weeks leading up to the event: KABC/KLOS,
KATY, KWRP, KFRG, and KOLA.
KABC Radio and Vons markets partnered in a promotion that resulted in
both store tie-ins and product sponsorships, plus a highly successful on-
air promotion for an Intimate Weekend Getaway in Temecula for listeners
of the KABC Restaurant Show, which brought in hundreds of calls. The
show, hosted by Mado Martinoil and Amy Strong, was broadcast live from
the Festival on Saturday morning, May 1. This promotional relationship
also resulted in new and renewed relationships with food product
sponsors.
KABC's sister station, KLOS, was a Main Stage sponsor and ran a spot
schedule promoting the talent line-up·
KOLA 99,9 provided live mentions, live giveaways, a live 3-hour remote
broadcast with call-ins on Saturday May 1 and in web advertising. The
station held a pre-event contest for a hot air balloon ride, dinner, festival
attendance, and wine tasting, with winners announced during the live
broadcast.
KFRG Radio conducted a major on-air promotion, running live
announcements, recorded announcements and live mentions to promote
listeners winning "Frog Freebie Weekend" tickets to the event.
KATY-FM was a Main Stage sponsor and provided a heavy schedule in
promotional spots, including ticket give-aways on KATY and KCXX.
KWRP-FM provided 75 promotional spots in exchange for sponsorship
benefits, including a booth at the festival.
7. Additionally, a cash buy was coordinated on regional and local radio.
Radio Public Service Campaign
A non-profit organization identification number was secured for the Festival from
the Southern California Broadcasters Association; public service announcements
were written and submitted to radio and television stations throughout Los
Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and San Diego Counties.
Publicity Campaign
An extensive campaign of media contact was begun on December 1, 1998, and
continued throughout the months leading up to the Festival. As the enclosed
sampling of clippings demonstrates, the Festival garnered excellent pick-up of
news releases and coverage of event details by individual reporters and editors.
4
ATTACHMENT D - BUDGET/FINANCIAL STATEMENT
08126199
Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival
Budget Overview
July 1999 through June 2000
Ordinary Income/Expense
Income
4100 · Sponsor income
4200 · Admissions income
4220 · Outside ticket sales
4230 · RV ticket sales
4240 · Saturday ticket sales
4250 · Sunday ticket sales
Total 4200 - Admissions income
4300 · Balloon income
4320 · Corporate balloons
Total 4300 · Balloon income
4400 · Beverage income
4415. Beer/Wine
4430 · Ice
Total 4400 · Beverage income
4500. Commercial court income
4510 · Entry fees
Total 4500 · Commercial court income
4600 · Food court income 4510 · Entry fees
Total 4600 · Food court income
4550 · Parking Income
4655 · Kids Fare
4657 - Underwriting
4658 · %
Total 4555- Kids Fare
4700 · Souvenir income
4750- General store
4900 · Arts and crafts income
4510 · Entry fees
Total 4900 · Arts and crafts income
Total Income
Expense
5000. Operating expense
5010 · Bank charges and fees
5015- Copy machine
5025 · Dues
5030 · Equipment repairs
5035 · Insurance41ability
5045- Lease I rent
5050 · Licenses & permits
5055. Mileage
5060 · Postage
5065 · Printing
5070 · Seminars & travel
5075. Subscriptions & publications
5080 · Supplies
5085. Telephone I office expense
Total 5000 · Operating expense
5100 · Payroll expense 5110 · Wages
5120 · Payroll tax expense
5125, Employee banefit
5130 · Workman's compensation
Total 5100. Payroll expanse
5200 · Board expense
Jul '99 - Jun '00
27,000.00
19,000.00
117,000.00
76,000.00
2"-'-'~,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
132,000.00
133,000.00
31,000.00
31,000.00
24,000.00
8,003.00
2,503.00
10,500.00
4,000.00
12,200.00
12,20O.00
2,500.00
1,300.00
9,500.00
4,8OO.0O
1,400.00
1,500.00
1,500.00
100.00
3,000.00
4,300.00
31,800.00
3,700.00
1,200.00
1,200.00
50,100.00
DRAFT
Page1
08126199
Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival
Budget Overview
July 1999 through June 2000
5210 · Supplies
5220 · Meetings
5230 · Shirts
Total 5200 · Board expense
5300 · Donation expense
5310 · M.H.S. Baseball Program
5320 · Temecula Volunteer Fire Dept.
Total 5300 · Donation expense
5400 · Command expense
6410 · Food & beverages
5440 · Supplies
6450 · Telephone
Total 5400 · Command expense
5500 · Facilities
5515. Fencing
5520 · Fuel
5525- Electrical
6530- Golf carts
5535. Light towers
5550 · RV's & modulars
5560 · EquilxTmnt rental
5565. Storage bins
5570 · Supplies
6572 · Tables and Chairs
5075- Tents
6580 · Toilets
5585. Trash
Total 5500 · Facilities
5700 · Marketing expense
5710 · Cold air balloon
5715- Flyers
5130 · Marketing supplies
5732 · Postage
5735. Print marketing
5740- Program
5145- Radio
5750 · Marketing FIrm
5757 · Telephone and fax
5765. Assorted Services
Total 5700 · Marketing expense
5800- Professional fees
5810 · Accounting
5020- Auding
5830 · Consulting
Total 5800 · Professional fees
5900. Public safety
5010 · Highway patrol
5920 · Security
5940 · Sheriffs
5950 · Supplies
5860 · -Radios
Total 5900 · Public safety
6000 · Sponsor expense 6020- Souvenirs
6045 · Sponsor Awards
Total 6000. Sponsor expense
6050 · -Signage
6100 · Volunteer
6110 · Food
Jul '99 - Jun '00
7,000.00
750.00
7,750.00
3,500.00
1,000.00
1,500.00
6,000.00
10,000.00
2,500.00
21,00GO0
5,000.00
1,500.00
5,000.00
11,000.00
6,800.00
109,200.00
2,500.00
2,000.00
17,000.00
1,200.00
10,000.00
113,750.00
3,500.00
3,500.00
1,000.00
8,000.00
2,100.00
16,000.00
16,000.00
1,000.00
1,700.00
2,000.00
4,000.00
6,030.00
5,000.00
2,000.00
DRAFT
Page 2
08~6~9
Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival
Budget Overview
July 1999 through June 2000
6120 · T-shirts
6130 · Printing
Total 6100 · Volunteer
6200 · Admissions expense
6210 · County fee - parking
6215- County fees - tickets
6220 · Entry refund
6270 · Ticket printing
Total 6200 · Admissions expense
6300 · Balloon expense
6310 · Accony}clations
6320 · Show-up incentives
6340 · Fuel
Total 6300 · Balloon expense
6400- Beverage expense
6410 · ABC license
6415. Beer
6420 · Beverage supplies
6435- Ice
6440 · MIcro beer-tasting
Total 6400 · Beverage expense
6500 · Cowrenerclal court expense
6520 · Insurance
Total 6500 · Commercial court expense
6600 · Entertainment expense
6620. Producer/Booklng Agent
6700 · Main backstage supplies
6110 · Accommodations
6730 · Food
6770 · Sound & LIgMs
6780 · Stages
Total 6700 · Main backstage supplies
6900. Entertainer acts
6910 · Kids Faire
6920 · Main stage
6930 · Wine stage
Total 6900 · Entertainer acts
Total 6600 · Entertainment expense
7300 · Food court expense
7320. Insurance
7340 · Health Permit
Total 7300 · Food court expense
7500 · Parking
7510 · Supplies
7520 · Cones
Total 7500 · Parking
7600 · Souvenir expense
7620- Inventory purchases
7640 · Supplies
7670 · Sales Tax
Total 7600- Souvenir expense
7700 · VIP expense
7710 · Beverages
7720 · Food
7740 - Supplies
7770- Wine
Jul '99 - Jun '00
1,500.00
7,000.00
10,000.00
500.00
2,000.00
19,500.00
8,700.00
3,500.00
1,200.00
13,400.00
'1,800.00
2,700.00
15,030.00
2,800.00
2,800.00
7,000.00
6,0QO.O0
3,000.00
15,000.00
12,0(:30.00
6,500.00
10,000.00
139,500.00
875.00
1,425.00
3,000.00
2,000.00
1,200.00
DRAFT
Page 3
08~6~9
Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival
Budget Overview
July 1999 through June 2000
Jul '99 - Jun '00
Total 7700- VIP expense
7800. Wine tasting venue expense
7810 · Glasses - plastic
7815. Glasses - tasting
7860 · Tickets
7870 · Wine
Total 7800. Wine tasting venue expense
7900 · Arts and crafts expense 7910- Insurance
Total 7900- Arts and crafts expense
Total Expense
Net Ordinary Income
Net Income
0.00
DRAFT
Page 4
07/16/99
Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival
Balance Sheet
As of June 30, 1999
ASSETS
Current Assets
Checking/Savings
1000 · California Bank & Trust
1100 · California Bank & Trust - tax
Total Checking/Savings
Accounts Receivable
1200 · Accounts receivable
Total Accounts Receivable
Other Current Assets
1400 .Inventory
Total Other Current Assets
Total Current Assets
Fixed Assets
1500 · Fixed assets
1525 · Accumulated depreciation
Total Fixed Assets
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES & EQUITY
Liabilities
Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable
2000 · Accounts payable
Total Accounts Payable
Other Current Liabilities
2100 · Payroll taxes payable
2200 · Sales taxes payable
Total Other Current Liabilities
Total Current Liabilities
Total Liabilities
Equity
3900 · Retained Earnings
Net Income
Total Equity
TOTAL LIABILITIES & EQUITY
Jun 30, °99
35,340.22
13,000.00
48,340.22
8,000.00
8,000.00
2,500.00
2,500.00
58,840.22
23,328.21
-9,686.00
13,642.21
72,482.43
36,517.66
36,517.66
2,925.55
2,989.74
5,915.29
42,432.95
42,432.95
-19,333.13
49,382.61
30,049.48
72,482.43
PFIEL! qI , ARY
Page1
07/16/99
Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival
Budget vs. Actual
July 1998 through June 1999
Jul '98 - Jun '99 Budget
$ Over Budget
Ordinary Income/Expense
Income
4100 · Sponsor income
4150 · Program sales
4200 · Admissions income
4220 · Outside ticket sales
4230 · RV ticket sales
4235 · Friday admissions
4240 · Saturday ticket sales
4250 · Sunday ticket sales
Total 4200 · Admissions income
4300 · Balloon income
4320 · Corporate balloons
4330 · Sponsorship tethered
Total 4300 · Balloon income
4400 · Beverage income
4410 Beer
4420 Bloody Mary's & Margaritas
4430 Ice
4440 Micro beer tickets
4450 Soda
4460 Water
4470 Wine by the glass
4400 Beverage income - Other
Total 4400 · Beverage income
4500 · Commercial court income
4510 · Entry fees
4520 · Insurance
4500 · Commercial court income - Other
Total 4500 · Commercial court income
4600 · Food court income
4610 · Entry fees
4620 · Insurance
4600 - Food court income - Other
Total 4600 · Food court income
4650 · Parking income
4655 · Kids Fare
4700 · Souvenir income
4750 · General store
4800 · Wine tasting venue
4900 · Arts and crafts income
4910 - Entry fees
4920 · Insurance
Total 4900 · Arts and crafts income
4950 · Misc income
4960 · 1998 Income
4999 · Uncatagorized income
Total Income
Expense
5000 · Operating expense
5010
5015
5025
5030
5035
5040
5045
5050
5055
Bank charges and fees
Copy machine
Dues
Equipment repairs
Insurance-liability
Interest expense
Lease I rent
Licenses & permits
Mileage
138,000.00
0.00
27,351.96
19,253.00
0.00
117,897.11
76,707.00
241,209.07
2,250.00
0.00
2,250.00
0.00
0.00
1,044.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
132,324.60
133,368.60
33,250.00
0.00
0.00
33,250.00
31,215.00
0.00
0.00
31,215.00
24,446.66
9,383.85
38,425.46
3,795.80
0.00
12,075.00
0.00
12,075.00
901.16
8,737.08
7,463.84
684,521.52
263.65
2,139.43
1,284.50
898.73
14,995.35
0.00
4,745.40
1,355.00
63.40
125,000.00
15,000.00
35,612.00
20,000.00
10,000.00
122,000.00
72,000.00
259,612.00
7,500.00
8,000.00
15,500.00
50,000.00
1,500.00
600.00
10,000.00
700.00
500.00
8,000.00
71,300.00
32,350.00
2,200.00
34,550.00
26,000.00
2,500.00
28,500.00
21,000.00
35,000.00
50,000.00
11,500.00
2,200.00
13,700.00
669,162.00
200.00
2,000.00
1,000.00
250.00
12,000.00
500.00
4,600.00
2,000.00
360.00
13,000.00
-15,000.00
-8,260.04
-747.00
-10,000.00
-4,102.89
4,707.00
-18,402.93
-5,250.00
-8,000.00
-13,250.00
-50,000.00
-1,500.00
444.00
-10,000.00
-700.00
-500.00
-8,000.00
62,068.60
900.00
-2,200.00
-1,300.00
5,215.00
-2,500.00
2,715.00
3,446.66
3,425.46
-50,000.00
575.00
-2,200.00
-1,625.00
15,359.52
63.65
139.43
284.50
648.73
2,995.35
-500.00
145.40
-645.00
-296.60
Page1
07116/99
Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival
Budget vs. Actual
July 1998 through June 1999
5060 · Postage
5065 · Printing
5070 · Seminars & travel
5080 · Supplies
5085 · Telephone / office expense
5000 · Operating expense - Other
Total 5000 · Operating expense
5100 ~ Payroll expense 5110 · Wages
5120 · Payroll tax expense
5125 · Employee benefit
5130 · WorkmaWs compensation
Total 5100 · Payroll expense
5200 · Board expense
5210 · Supplies
5220 · Meetings
5230 · Shirts
Total 5200 · Board expense
5300 · Donation expense
5400 · Command expense
5410 · Food & beverages
5440 · Supplies
5450 · Telephone
Total 5400 · Command expense
5500, Facilities
5510 Clean-up
5515 Fencing
5520 Fuel
5525 Electrical
5530 Golf carts
5535 Light towers
5540 Marking paint
5547 Radios and PA system
5550 · RV's & modulars
5555 · Signage
5560 · Equipment rental
5565 · Storage bins
5570 - Supplies
5572 · Tables and Chairs
5575 · Tents
5580 · Toilets
5585 · Trash
5500. Facilities - Other
Total 5500 · Facilities
5600 · Funds control
5660 · Supplies
Total 5600 · Funds control
5700 · Marketing expense
5710 · Cold air balloon
5715 · Flyers
5722 · Media souvenirs
5725 · Marketing expense-other
5732 - Postage
5735 · Print marketing
5740 · Program
5745. Radio
5750- Retainer
5757 - Telephone and fax
5700 · Marketing expense - Other
Jul '98 - Jun '99
1,279.56
1,322.45
0.00
1,743.84
4,256.19
0.00
34,347.50
40,742.50
3,606.97
100.00
0.00
44,449.47
0.00
174.91
230.00
404.91
7,750.00
43.50
200.00
1,243.14
1,486.64
0.00
9,998.19
2,516.16
32,025.00
12,424.07
4,900.00
0.00
1,130.00
7,773.26
2,638.37
2,600.00
912.00
354.17
4,313.01
33,712.87
10,559.10
10,091.04
1,710.96
137,658.20
114.14
114.14
1,646.26
1,425.99
0.00
7,921.12
520.09
13,053.16
9,617.25
8,681.25
55,000.00
1,217.33
2,800.00
Budget
1,500.00
1,500.00
750.00
3,000.00
3,200.00
32,860.00
43,200.00
7,200.00
50,400.00
300.00
150.00
400.00
850.00
7,000.00
3,500.00
1,000.00
3,000.00
7,500.00
4,000.00
10,000.00
1,800.00
21,000.00
8,000.00
2,500.00
250.00
2,000.00
5,000.00
7,000.00
1,500.00
900.00
2,000.00
6,000.00
34,000.00
11,000.00
2,800.00
119,750.00
1,000.00
2,000.00
500.00
1,900.00
1,500.00
10,000.00
17,000.00
10,000.00
55,000.00
650.00
$ Over Budget
-220.44
-177.55
-750.00
-1256.16
1,056.19
1,487.50
-2,457.50
-7,200.00
-5,950.53
-300.00 24.91
-170.00
-445.09
750.00
-3,456.50
-800.00
-1,756.86
-6,013.36
-4,000.00
-1.81
716.16
11,025.00
4,424.07
2,400.00
-250.00
-870.00
2,773.26
-4,361.63
1,100.00
12.00
-1,645.83
-1,686.99
-287.13
-440.90
7,291.04
17,908.20
646.26
-574.01
-500.00
6,021.12
-979.91
3,053.16
-7,382.75
-1,318.75
0.00
567.33
Page 2
07116199
Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival
Budget vs. Actual
July 1998 through June 1999
Total 5700 · Marketing expense
5800 · Professional fees
5810 · Accounting
Total 5800 · Professional fees
5900. Public safety
5910. Highway patrol
5920 · Marines
5940 · Sheriffs
5950 · Supplies
Total 5900 · Public safety
6000 · Sponsor expense 6020 · Souvenirs
6040 · Sponsor Awards
6000 · Sponsor expense - Other
Total 6000 · Sponsor expense
6100 · Volunteer
6110 · Food
6120 · T-shirts
6130- Printing
6140 · Other
Total 6100 · Volunteer
6200 · Admissions expense
6210 · County fee - parking
6215 · County fees - ticketa
6220 · Entry refund
6270 · Ticket printing
Total 6200 · Admissions expense
6300 · Balloon expense
6310 - Accomodations
6320 · Show-up incentives
6340 · Fuel
6390 · Tethered balloons
Total 6300 · Balloon expense
6400 · Beverage expense
6410 · ABC license
6415 · Beer
6420 · Beverage supplies
6425 · Mary & Margarita mix
6435. Ice
6440 · Micro beer-tasting
6460 · Soda
6465 · Water
6470 · Wine
Total 6400 · Beverage expense
6500 · Commercial court expense 6520. Insurance
Total 6500 · Commercial court expense
6600 · Entertainment expense
6610 · Entertainment Backline
6700 · Main backstage supplies
6710 · Accommodations
6730 · Food
6770 · Sound & Lights
6780 - Stages
6790 · Main backstage supplies - other
Total 6700 · Main backstage supplies
Jul '98 - Jun '99 Budget
101,882.45
2,305.00
2,305.00
1,954.45
16,765.00
15,507.38
877.60
35,104.43
0.00
3,134.31
1,902.81
5,037.12
0.00
13.60
0.00
150.00
163.60
6,988.00
4,506.00
0.00
0.00
11,494.00
8,702.64
3,700.00
0.00
0.00
12,402.64
330.00
8,336.75
3,305.11
0.00
1,645.46
2,680.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
16,297.32
0.00
0.00
5,350.00
0.00
1,320.91
13,800.00
12,000.00
78.75
27,199.66
99,550.00
3,500.00
3,500.00
5,000.00
15,000.00
16,000.00
1,000.00
37,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
1,500.00
300.00
3,800.00
7,000.00
10,000.00
500.00
1,500.00
19,000.00
6,500.00
3,500.00
1,200.00
8,000.00
19,200.00
300.00
13,000.00
1,200.00
300.00
1,800.00
2,000.00
300.00
300.00
3,000.00
22,200.00
2,200.00
2,200.00
6,000.00
3,000.00
17,370.00
12,250.00
500.00
39,120.00
$ Over Budget
2,332.45
-1,195.00
-1,195.00
-3,045.55
1,765.00
-492.62
-122.40
-1,895.57
-2,000.00
3,037.12
-2,000.00
-1,486.40
-300.00
-3,636.40
-12.00
-5,494.00
-500.00
-1,500.00
-7,506.00
2,202.64
200.00
-1,200.00
-8,000.00
-6,797.36
30.00
-4,663.25
2,105.11
-300.00
-154.54
680.00
-300.00
-300.00
-3,000.00
-5,902.68
-2,200.00
-2,200.00
-6,000.00
-1,679.09
-3,570.00
-250.00
-421.25
-11,920.34
Page 3
07/16/99
Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival
Budget vs. Actual
July 1998 through June 1999
6900 · Entertainer acts
6910 · Kids Faire
6920 · Main stage
6930 · Wine stage
Total 6900 · Entertainer acts
7000 · Producer
7200 · Stages
7210 · Kids faire
Total 7200 · Stages
Total 6600 · Entertainment expense
7300 · Food court expense 7320- Insurance
7300 · Food court expense - Other
Total 7300 · Food court expense
7500 · Parking
7510 · Supplies
7520 · Cones
7570 · Power
Total 7500 · Parking
7600 · Souvenir expense
7620 · Inventory purchases
7640 · Supplies
7670 · Sales Tax
Total 7600 · Souvenir expense
7700 · VIP expense
7710. Beverages
7720 · Food
7740 · Supplies
7770 · Wine
Total 7700 · VIP expense
7800 · Wine tasting venue expense
7810 · Glasses - plastic
7815 · Glasses - tasting
7860 · Tickets
7870 - Wine
Total 7800 · Wine tasting venue expense
7900 · Arts and crafts expense
7910. Insurance
7920. Power
Total 7900 · Ads and crafts expense
Total Expense
Net Ordinary Income
Other Income/Expense
Other Expense
8000 - 1998 Expenses
8700 · General Store Expense 8710 · Sales tax
8700 · General Store Expense - Other
Total 8700 · General Store Expense
Jul '98 - Jun '99 Budget
6,500.00 5,000.00
77,450.00 80,000.00
7,950.00 10,000.00
91,900.00 95,000.00
6,500.00 6,500.00
170.90
170.90
131,120.56 140,620. O0
0.00 2,500.00
531.00
531.00 2,500.00
522.43 200.00
50.09 800.00
0.00 0.00
572.52 1,000.00
24,799.62 30,000.00
83.50 500.00
2,866.74
27,749.86 30,500.00
43.50 200.00
0,00 0.00
476.47 250.00
0.00 1,200.00
519.97 1,650.00
0.00 700.00
4,271.00
0.00 200.00
33,500.48 32,000.00
37,771.48 32,900.00
0.00 2,200.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 2,200.00
609,162.81 638,180.00
75,358.71 30,982.00
21,752.38
254.00
3,969.72
4,223.72
Total Other Expense
Net Other Income
25,976.10
-25,976.10
0.00
$ Over Budget
1,500.00
-2,550.00
-2,050.00
-3, 100.00
0.00
-9,499.44
-2,500.00
-1,969.00
322.43
-749.91
0.00
-427.48
-5,200.38
-416.50
-2,750.14
-156.50
0.00
226.47
-1,200.00
-1,130.03
-700.00
-200.00
1,500.48
4,871.48
-2,200.00
0.00
-2,200.00
-29,017.19
44,376.71
-25,976.10
Page4
07/16/99
Net Income
Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival
Budget vs. Actual
July 1998 through June 1999
Jul '98 - Jun '99
49,382.61
Budget
30,982.00
$ Over Budget
18,400.61
Page 5
ATTACHMENT E - SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT
ADVERTISING AGREEMENT BETWEEN
CITY OF TEMECULA AND
TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON & WINE ASSOCIATION
This Agreement, made this 14th day of September, 1999, by and between the
CITY OF TEMECULA, (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and TEMECULA VALLEY
BALLOON & WINE ASSOCIATION, a California nonprofit corporation (hereinafter
referred to as CTVBWA").
A. TVBWA will operate the 'q'emecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival" on
June 9 - 11, 2000. The Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival is a special event
located at Lake Skinner featuring approximately 50 hot air balloons, main stage
entertainment, arts and crafts fair, tethered balloon ddes and a wine venue featuring the
Temecula Valley. Attendance in previous years has been approximately 40,000 +
people for the 3-day event.
B. The City of Temecula desires to be a Premier Sponsor of the 2000
Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows:
A. In exchange for the payment of $ , the City of Temecula shall be
designated as a "Premier Sponsor' of the 2000 Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine
Festival. In exchange for being a Premier Sponsor, the City of Temecula will receive the
benefits as listed in Attachment A.
B. Any media visits pdor to the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival
coordinated by the Festival or its public relations representatives will include an invitation
to visit all Temecula entities (i.e. Old Town, wineries, golf). Secondly, the Festival shall
include in its basic press kit a feature article of no less than three pages, which focuses
on the attractions of Temecula, including Old Town, golf, wineries, etc.) This
informational piece shall be provided to all media working with the Festival or its
representatives on Festival-related stodes.
C. The TVBWF shall submit a wdtten request to the City's Maintenance
Superintendent requesting any City owned light towers, cones, barricades, directional
signs, flashing beacons, etc. no later than 60 days preceding the first day of the Balloon
& Wine Festival.
D. All event tickets, parking passes and official Festival souvenir
merchandise shall be submitted to the City Manager no later than one full week
preceding the first day of the Festival.
E. Within 60 days following the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival,
TVBWA shall prepare and submit to the City Manager and Assistant City Manager a
wdtten report evaluating the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival event, its
attendance/demographics, and describing the materials in which the City was listed as a
Premier Sponsor. The report should also include samples of media press dippings,
flyers, pamphlets, etc. in a presentation notebook format.
F. TVBWA agrees that it will defend, indemnify and hold the City and its
elected officials, officer, agents, and employees free and harmless from all claims for
damage to persons or property by reason of TVBWA's acts or omissions or those of
TVBWA's employees, officers, agents, or invites in connection with the Temecula Valley
Balloon & Wine Festival to the maximum extent allowed by law.
G. TVBWA shall secure from a good and responsible company or
companies doing insurance business in the State of California, pay for and maintain in
full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement a policy of comprehensive general
liability and liquor liability in which the City is named insured or is named as an additional
insured with TVBWA and shall fumish a Certificate of Liability by the City.
Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy or any subsequent
endorsement attached hereto, the protection offered by the policy shall;
1. Include the City as the insured or named as an additional insured
covedng all claims adsing out of, or in connection with, the Temecula Valley Balloon &
Wine Festival.
2. Include the City, its officers, employees and agents while acting
within the scope of their duties under this Agreement against all claims adsing out of, or
in connection with Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival.
3. Provide the following minimum limits:
General Liability: $2,000,000 combined single limit per
occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property
damage.
(B)
Liquor Liability: $2,000,000 combined single limit per
occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property
damage.
4. The insurer shall agree to waive all dghts of subrogation against
the City, its officer, officials, employees and volunteers for losses adsing from the
Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival.
5. Bear an endorsement or shall have attached a rider whereby it is
provided that, in the event of expiration or proposed cancellation of such policy for any
reason whatsoever, the City shall be notified by registered mail, postage prepaid, return
receipt requested, not less than thirty (30) days beforehand.
6. Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and
approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or
eliminate such deductible or self-insured retention as respects the City, its officers,
officials and employees or TVBWA shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses
and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
H. Should any litigation be commenced between the parties, hereto,
concerning the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party concerning the
provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to
reasonable attomey's fees, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled.
I. TVBWA shall promptly fumish the City, an independent certified public
accountant audit of the TVBWA financial statements by December 30, 1999.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
DATED:
TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON
& WINE ASSOCIATION
CITY OF TEMECULA
BY:
Carol Popejoy-Hime
General Manager
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorson, City Attomey
3
ITEM 26
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
William G, Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 14, 1999
Murrieta Creek--Arundo and Tamarisk Eradication
PREPARED BY: Allie Kuhns, Senior Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Provide direction to staff to work with the appropriate public agencies to develop a plan to
eradicate Arundo and Tamarisk growth in Murrieta Creek from Cherry Street at the northern
City Limit to Temecula Creek at the southern City Limit in exchange for habitat mitigation
credits.
Approve a general eradication program to include an initial eradication effort and 3 to 5 years
of follow-up maintenance to start in fiscal year 2000.
BACKGROUND: In July 1999, Mayor Ford requested and City Council directed staff to
research the eradication of Arundo weed growth from Murrieta Creek in Temecula.
The Arundo ("giant reed") weed is a giant cane that chokes creeks and other waterways with its
extreme water absorption capacity. The Tamarisk ("salt cedar") weed similarly depletes water
supplies from waterbeds. Both of these weeds have been found at various locations in Murrieta
Creek and along the creek banks, and will ultimately cause the destruction of the vegetation, and
specifically, endangered plants, that currently thrive in the creek.
Recognizing the destructive nature of these and other plants, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has
issued a Regional General Permit for the removal of invasive, exotic plants, This permit provides
the terms and conditions covering the removal of both Arundo and Tamarisk in Riverside County.
Currently, the Army Corps of Engineers ("Corps") is working with Riverside County Flood Control to
develop an eradication and maintenance plan for Murrieta Creek. However, their plan focuses on
the upstream portion of the Creek, from the Warm Springs confiuence to Clinton Keith Road.
Additionally, there is no confirmation as to if and when any Corps/Flood Control coordinated
eradication efforts will take place. Taking this into consideration, the Corps has advised staff that
eradication efforts in the lower Creek area within the City Limit will definitely be beneficial, regardless
of whether eradication occurs upstream, and should commence as soon as possible.
At this stage, the weeds have been found to be in clumps spread sporadically along the entire length
of Murdeta Creek. Estimated cost to remove these plants and to commence permanent eradication
efforts that will span 3 to 5 years is approximately $80,000 for the first year, and approximately
$15,000 annually thereafter. If these weeds are not eradicated in the near future (i.e., over the next
1
R:%agdrpt\99\0914~arundoandtamariskabatement
At this stage, the weeds have been found to be in clumps spread sporadically along the entire
length of Murrieta Creek. Estimated cost to remove these plants and to commence permanent
eradication efforts that will span 3 to 5 years is approximately $80,000 for the first year, and
approximately $15,000 annually thereafter. If these weeds are not eradicated in the near future
(i.e., over the next 18 months) while they are still relatively sparse in quantity, then the City risks
a major eradication effort that could cost hundreds of thousands of dollars and may span from 10
to 20 years in follow-up maintenance to ensure permanent eradication.
In an effort to maintain Murrieta Creek flow, each year, between the months of September and
November, Riverside County Flood Control mows the Creek. Due to the nature of this project, staff
will not be able to complete the Arundo and Tamarisk eradication efforts prior to this years annual
mowing.
As a part of the development of the eradication plan the Public Works Department will attempt to
negotiate habitat mitigation credits that can be applied to other City projects.
Based on this information, staff recommends that Riverside County Flood Control perform annual
Creek mowing for this cycle, and that Arundo and Tamarisk eradication be considered in next years
budget for the Fall of 2000.
FISCAL IMPACT: If Council directs staff to pursue eradication efforts, funds in the amount of
$80,000 must be appropriated from the General Fund Reserve to cover the initial removal effort
for this project. Staff is recommending that these funds be budgeted in the Fiscal Year 2000-01
Annual Operating Budget for initial eradication in the Fall of 2000. For future year maintenance,
funds will be budgeted each year during the Annual Operating Budget Process.
R:\agdrpt~99\0914\arundoandtamariskabatement