Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout011194 CC AgendaAGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER - 28816 PUJOL STREET JANUARY 11, 1994 - 7:00 PM At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM EXECUTIVE SESSION: 5:30 PM - Closed Seedon of the City Council pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to discuss pending litigation (New Community Lutheran Church), Section 94956.9(b) to lscuss potential liegedon and Section 94957.6 regarding labor negotiations. Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 94-01 Resolution: No. 94-01 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Ron Roberts presiding Invocation Pastor Kenn Coil, Neighborhood Church of the Nazarene Flag Salute Councilmember Birdsall ROLL CALL: Birdsell, Mufioz Parks, Stone, Roberrs PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Proclamation - John Affolter Day Presentation of Gavel to Incoming Mayor Presentation by Brian Loew, Executive Director of Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency - Overview of Long Term Habitat Conservation Plan for Stevens Kangaroo Rat PUBLIC FORUM This is · portion of the City Council meeting unique to the City of Temecula. At the meeting held on the second Tuesday of each month, the City Council will devote a period of time (not to exceed 30 minutes) for the purpose of providing the public with an opportunity to discuss topics of interest with the Council. The members of theCity Aget~e/011114 I 01/06/84 Council will respond to questions and may give direction to City staff. The Council is prohibited, by the provisions of the Brown Act, from taking any official action on any matter which is not on the agenda. If you desire to speak on any matter which is not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. For all other agenda items a 'Request to Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENTCALENDAR NOTICF TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 2 Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agende. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of November 30, 1993; 2.2 Approve the minutes of December 14, 1993. Aeende/011114 2 01/06N 3 4 5 7 Resolution Aoorovino List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt e resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A City Treasurer's Reoort as of October 31.1993 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's report as of October 31, 1993. City Treasurer's Reoort as of November 30. 1993 RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's report as of November 30, 1993. "No Parkino" Zone on Ynez Road from Rancho California Road to Rancho Hiohland RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF .THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING 'NO PARKING' ZONE ON YNEZ ROAD FROM RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD TO RANCHO HIGHLAND DRIVE Soeed Limit on Margarita Road between Solana And Winchester RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS AOende/OI11M 31 01/0S/14 8 All Way Stoo. Pauba Road at Meadows Parkway RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ESTABLISHING "STOP SIGNS' OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA 9 10 11 Authorization to Execute Suoolemental Agreement for the Use of 19th Year Community Develooment Block Grant Funds RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Authorize the Mayor to execute the Supplemental Agreement for the 19th Year Community Development Block Grant Funds. Letter of Suooort for. AB-927 (Strengthen Anti-Pornooraohv Laws) RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Direct staff to prepare a letter indicating support for Assembly Bill No. 927 as it will be reintroduced in the 1994 Legislative Session. Comoletion and Acceotance of Jefferson Avenue Storm Drain Imorovements at Winchester Road. Project No. PW93-01 RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Accept the Jefferson Avenue Storm Drain Improvements at Winchester Road, Project No. PW93-01, as complete and direct the City Clerk to: File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. Aeenk/O11104 4 01,/06/94 12 Contract Amendment No. 1 for Professional Survevino and Geotechnical Services for the Ynez Road Widtning Project. PW9~-05. CFD 88-12 RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve Contract Amendment No. I for additional Professional Services for the Ynez Road Widening Project, PW92-05 for the following professional services: Professional Surveying Services by JFD Associates, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $20,033.50. Professional Geotechnical Services by Law/Crandall, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $6,586.00. 13 Contract Chanae Orders No. 36 through No. 40 for Ynez Road Widening Project. PW92-05. CFD 88-12 RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Approve Contract Change Orders No. 36 through No. 40 for Ynez Road Widening Project, PW92-05 for labor and equipment for various items of work, in the amount of $12,711.68. 14 15 Fifth Amendment to the Joint Powers Aoreement Creatino the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency to Allow Compensation of $100.00 for Board Meetina Attendance RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Approve the attached amendment to Section 3.6 of the Joint Powers Agreement Creating the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency (the "Agreement") and Authorize the Mayor to sign the amended Agreement. Records Destruction Aooroval RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of Temacula approved Records Retention policy. AgeIda/011114 6 01/06/94 16 Pechanga Casino Status Reoort RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Receive and file report. PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 17 An Interim Ordinance Adooted by Urgency Measurers Reauiring a Conditional Use Permit for the Establishment of Nightclubs. Teen Clubs. Dance Halls. Bars and Cocktail Lounges. Billiard Halls. Massage Parlors and Video Game Arcades RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Issue a report describing the steps to address the condition that resulted in the adoption of the Ordinance; 17.2 Adopt an Ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94- AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUIRING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NIGHTCLUBS, TEEN CLUBS, DANCE HALLS, BARS AND COCKTAIL LOUNGES, BILLlARD HALLS. MASSAGE PARLORS AND VIDEO GAME ARCADES 18 Planning Aoolication No. 93-0179. Amendment No. 1. Second Unit Permit - ADoeal of Conditions of APPrOVal NO. 31 and 42 (reauirement for the all-weather access to the second unit) (Continued from the meeting of 12/14~93) RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Direct the Planning Commission to consider amending Section 18.28.A.C.(10) of Ordinance No. 348 pertaining to the type of paving material required for access to second dwelling units; and A~mdaV011114 e 01~06~4 18.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94.- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE APPEAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0179, AMENDMENT NO. 1, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITION THAT IT COMPLY WITH SECTION NO. 18.28.A.C.(10) OF ORDINANCE NO. 348 AS AMENDED PERTAINING TO THE DEFINITION OF ALL-WEATHER ACCESS FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES COUNCIL BUSINESS 19 ADoointment of Planning Commissioner RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Review the Ad-Hoc committee recommendations and appoint one applicant to fill an unexpired term (ending June 4, 1994) on the Temecula Planning Commission. 20 Ordinance Adooting Temecula Municioal Code RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ADOPTING THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE 20.2 Direct the City Clerk to schedule a public hearing to be held on January 25, 1994 which includes consideration of the adoption of the Temecula Municipal Code end the following secondary codes: Ae Ee Riverside County Ordinances adopted by reference; Uniform Building Code, 1991 Edition with appendices in California State Amendments Uniform Building Codes Standards, 1991 Edition Uniform Mechanical Code, 1991 Edition, with appendices in Califomia State Amendments. Uniform Plumbing Code. 1991 Edition, with appendices in California State Amendments. Aeendd011114 7 01~06Jl4 21 Uniform Administrative Code, 1991 Edition. Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1991 Edition. Uniform Housing Code. 1991 Edition; and Uniform Swimming Pools. Soa and Hot Tub Code, 1991 Edition. Selection of City Council Committee Assianments RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Select and appoint members of the City Council to act as Liaison to various City Commissions and to sews on various ad-hoc sub- committees for calendar year 1994. 22 Paloma del Sol - Agreement Between KRDC, Inc. and City Reoardina Acceotance of Park. ADDrOVal Of Final Tract Mao No. 94135-3 and Modification of Target Density for BRannino Area 6 RECOMMENDATION: 22.1 Approve the Agreement between Kemper Real Estate Development Company and the City of Temecula regarding Paloma del Sol. 23 Agoroyal of Final Tract Mao No. ~4135.3 RECOMMENDATION: 23.1 Approve Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135-3 subject to the Conditions of Approval. 24 25 Status Reoort on Widening of Winchester Road Bridge Widenina and Logo Ramo, Overland Overcrossina, and Margarita Road Widening North of Rancho California Road (Placed on the agenda at the request of Councilmember Mufioz) 24.1 Receive and file report. Discussion of Sister City Proaram (BRaced on the agenda at the request of Mayor Robarts) CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT /~eend~O111N I 01/06/14 ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: January 25, 1994, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California Aeelde)011114 · TfMF~UI A CnMMUNITY SFRVICFS nltTRICT MFFTINR - fro be held at 8:001 CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: PUBLIC COMMENT: PRESENTATIONS: CONSENT CALENDAR President Jeff Stone DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Mufioz, Perks, Robarts, Stone, Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink 'Request to Speak' to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. Presentation of Gavel to Incoming President Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of November 30, 1993; 1.2 Approve the minutes of December 14, 1993. 2 Amendment to the Solicitation of Construction Bids for Soorts Park Slooe Repair Project (PW93-06) (Continued from the meeting of 12/14/93) RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the Sports Park Slope Repair Project (PW93-06). 3 Contract Amendment - California Landscaoe. Inc. RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Award contract for landscape maintenance services with California Landscape, Inc. to include the addition of Paloma Del Sol Park. A~eldl/011114 10 01/06/14 4 Grant Deed for Paloma Del Sol Park - Kemoer Communitv Develooment Comoanv 5 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Accept a grant deed from Kemper Community Development Company for Paloma Del Sol Park, a 9.50 acre sports complex within the Paloma Del Sol Development, subject to the vacation proceedings of Campanula Way. Acceotance of the nuitclaim Deeds for the Parkino Lot adjacent to Kent Hinterqardt Memorial Park RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Accept the quitclaim deeds from the Murdy Foundation and Kemper Community Development Company for the parking lot adjacent to Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park. 6 Comoletion and Acceotance of the Riverton Park Imorovements Proiect No. PW93- 04CSD RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Direct City Clerk to: · File the Notice of Completion and release the Performance Bond; Accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract value upon acceptance of the improvements. Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after acceptance of the improvements if no liens have been filed to that date. 6.2 Authorize the Director of Community Services to accept the park site improvements upon completion of the maintenance period. Amendment No. 9 to the Professional Services Agreement for a Project Coordinator Durino Construction of the Community Recreation Center Project No. PW92-029B RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve Amendment No. 2, extending the Professional Services Agreement for a Project Coordinator during construction of the Community Recreation Center, Project No. PW92-29B in an amount not to exceed &l 0,240.00. AeendeR)1111a, 11 01/06/94 8 Contract Change Orders No. 10 throuah No. 11. Community Recreation Center - Phase II. Project No. PW9~-~9B RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve Contract Change Orders No. 10 through No. 11 for the Community Recreation Center - Phase II, Project No. PW92-29B, for labor, material, and equipment in the amount of $34,519.14. GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Dixon DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting: January 25, 1994, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California Aeende/O11194 12 01/06/84 T~M~C~I ~ R~n~V~I OPM~NT A~ENC~ Mff~TIN~ CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: PRESENTATIONS: PUBLIC COMMENT: AGENCY BUSINESS I Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 1.2 Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Mufioz, Roberrs, Stone, Parks Presentation of Gavel to Incoming Chairperson Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a completed pink 'Request to Speak' to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. Approve the minutes of November 30, 1993; Approve the minutes of December 14, 1993. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting: January 25, 1995, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California AeerdNO111N 1,~ 01/0NI4 PRESENTATIONS\ PROCLAMATIONS The City of Temecula PROCLAMATION WIIEREAS, the Temecula Valley has long been served by a fine member of the agricultural community, and WHEREAS, he was the founder and first president of the Arabian Horse Association of Temecula; and WIIlItEAS, this citizen has served the greater Temecula Valley as a member of the San Jacinto College Board of Trustees; and WHEREAS, he has also been an active participant and member of The Friends of French Valley Airport, dedicated to pwmoting the local airport and the promotion of safe air traffic and travel within the Temecula Valley; and WItEREAS, his interest and concern with protecting and preserving good water quality within the valley has led him to serve on the Advisory Committee of the Rancho California Water District; and WHEREAS, he has actively pursued the cause of good government by being a generous supporter of local, state and national political leaden, NOW, TItEREFORE, I, I. Sat Mu~oz, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim January 11, 1994 to be "JOHN AFFOLTER DAY" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 30th day of December, 1993. J. Sat Mu~oz, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning January 11, 1994 Long-Term Habitat Conservation Plan for the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat PREPARED BY: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner BACKGROUND: In 1990, the City of Temecula became a member of the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency (RCHCA) Joint Powers Authority. The RCHCA is the organization responsible for implementing the Section l O(a) Permit and the Short-Term Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) for the Stephens Kangaroo Rat (SKR). The HCP is administered through an Agency Agreement with the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) and a Section 10(a) Permit from the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). DISCUSSION: The permanent Long-term HCP will replace the RCHCAs existing SKR conservation program and take provisions of SKR under the Short-Term HCP. The permanent HCP would be valid for 30 years and would authorize incidental take of SKR on lands within the jurisdictions of the RCHCA members. It is important to note that the authorization provided by permanent HCP would only cover incidental take of SKR. The HCP would not cover any other federally or state listed species, including but not limited to the coastal California gnatcatcher. The primary elements of the HCP plan will be: Establishment of Core Reserve Areas - Approximately 12,500 acres of SKR habitat is in five SKR core reserves that would be established, managed, and expanded under the permanent plan. At least 2,500 acres of SKR habitat is to be added to the core reserve system over time through acquisitions, dedications and habitat enhancement and restoration. R:%S~ST~.CC 1/51~4 tie Habitat Mitigation - One acre of replacement habitat will be acquired and conserved by the RCHCA for every one acre of occupied SKR habitat taken under the new permit and agreement. If acres of take exceed acres of replacement habitat by more than 10 percent, the City's ability to authorize incidental take of SKR will be suspended until sufficient acreage of replacement habitat has been acquired. Mitioation Fee. The $1,950/acre mitigation fee currently collected in the short- term HCP would be continued to be collected. The fee would be adjusted annually based on the consumer price index (CPI). When the 2~500 acre performance standard is met, the habitat replacement and mitigation fee requirements will be re-evaluated by the RCHCA, USFWS end CDFG. Incidental Take - If a project involves take of 1 O0 or more acres of SKR habitat, the City would be required to provide the RCHCA, CDFG and USFWS 30 days advance notice prior to City action on the project. The advanced notice would allow the RCHCA, CDFG and USFWS to review and comment on large scale projects prior to City Action. If a 100 acre project would exceed the 10 percent threshold mentioned above, the City would be unable to authorize the take until the 10 percent margin is restored. For General Plan Amendments (GPA) within ½ mile of a Core Reserve Area, 30 day advance notice to the RCHCA, CDFG and USFWS would be required. The ½ mile provision is relevant in that the City's Sphere of Influence is adjacent to the Lake Skinner Core Reserve Area. The plan does not specify what level of review would be provided by the RCHCA, CDFG and USFWS concerning GPAs. Please review the attached draft HCP and provide staff with your comments and concerns to include in the City's official response the document. ATTACHMENT: Habitat Conservation Plan for the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat in Western Riverside County, California -Volume I ITEM 1 ITEM NO. 2 MINUTES OF A SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL AND THE MURRIETA CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 1993 A special meeting of the Temecule City Council and the Murrieta City Council was called to order on Tuesday, November 30, 1993, 6:30 P.M., at the Murrieta City Hall Council Chambers, 26442 Beckman Court, Murriata, California. City of Murrieta Mayor Jack vanHaaster presiding. PRESENT: 4 MURRIETA COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 1 PRESENT: 4 MURRIETA COUNCILMEMBERS: TEMECULA COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: I TEMECULA COUNCILMEMBERS: Also present were Murrieta City Manager Jack Smith, Temecula City Manager David Dixon, Murrieta City Clerk Kay Vinson and Temecula City Clerk June Greek. Allen, Smith, Walsh, vanHaaster Gilliss Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Mui~oz Birdsall PUBLIC COMMENT Jeanne Gillen, 38160 Avenida La Create, Murrieta, said she has always enjoyed the mountain view from the both the 15 and 215 freeway, however, since the construction of the new Homebase store in Murrieta, this view has been obstructed. Ms. Giilen asked members from both City Councils to give the hillside views consideration in future planning. COUNCIL BUSINFSS 1. Discussion of Santa Maraarita River/San Luis Ray Watershed Manaoement Plan Murrieta City Manager Jack Smith summarized the staff report. Murrieta City Mayor vanHaaster opened the public hearing at 7:10 P.M. Jim Mocalis, 42290 Ivy Street, Murrieta, representing the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, offered to provide information upon request by both Councils. Peter Archuleta, 3100 Vista Way, Hemet, representing the Santa MargaritalSan Luis Ray Watershed Planning Agency, provided a summary of the establishment and purpose of the Santa Margarita/San Luis Ray Watershed Planning Agency. JCCMIN11130193 -1 - 12/09/93 JOINT TEMI:CULAIMURRIETA CITY COUNCIL MINUT;S NOVFMBER 30, 1993 Murrieta Planning Director Stephen Herding reviewed the staff report, outlining alternatives to avoid duplication of effort and to maximize resources. Paul Romero, 4600 Crestmore Road, Riverside, representing the County of Riverside Regional Perk & Open Space District, answered questions regarding the policy committee for the Santa Margarita River Watershed Management Program. Temecula Mayor Mufloz asked who participated in the Board meetings and if there were any concerns expressed by the Board in joining the agency. Mr. Romero said that at the last meeting the Board addressed the issue and expressed their support of the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) participation, but want to continue with the ongoing activities of the County Task Force. Murrieta Councilmember Gilliss arrived at 7:30 P.M. Mayor Pro Tam Robarts asked where the funds for running the agency come from. Mr. Archuleta explained the funds come from the member agencies. Mr. Archuleta said at the last meeting the Commission approved an assessment for the members to fund the scope of work for the watershed plan. He said he feels there needs to be a coordinated effort in watershed planning, since there is no money for duplicated efforts. Mr. Archuleta encouraged both Councils to join the JPA. David Bartlett, 24197 Via Prime Vera, Murrieta, said he feels the Santa Margarita River Watershed Management Plan is an ad-hoc committee attempting to take property rights. He said he feels the Councilmembers have a sacred trust to protect the rights of the property owners. John Bell, 37527 Vineyard Knoll, Murrieta, concurred with Mr. Bartlett's concerns. He said the Committee formed by County Supervisor Bob Buster is not represented by members of the public, land owners or business owners. Mr. Bell submitted a list of the members to the City Clerk. Mr. Bell said he did not support the City Council entering into the JPA. Jeanne Gillen, 38160 Avenida La Cresta, Murrieta, said she has served on the Committee as a volunteer as well as many other commissions and committees. She clarified it was Walt Abraham who formed the Santa Margarita Watershed Committee. Ms. Gillen said she is concerned there has been no recreation element to the plan and no input from the citizenary. A letter was received from W.H. Rawlings, Murrieta, encouraging both City Councils not to give responsibilities regarding watershed planning to a JPA that has no private interest participation. Temecula Mayor Muf~oz asked for comments from staff. JCCIIN11120/93 -2- 12/O9/92 JOINT TEM;CULA/MURRIETA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 30, 1993 Temecula Planning Director Gary Thornhill suggested the Councils allow staff members to work together on a recommendation. Murrieta Planning Director Steve Herding agreed with Director Thornhill. He said the purpose of tonights meeting was for staff to receive input from the Council. Councilmember Allen said there are worthwhile and needed flood control problems that are endangering Historic Old Town Murrieta. Councilmember Allen said he would prefer dealing with a formal and legal authority. Temecula Mayor Mufioz said he participated on the policy committee. He said he would support continuing to move ahead with the current management program, inviting the JPA to give input from their experience over the past 20 years. Temecula Councilmember Parks said he is concerned about creating a new committee when there is still another committee existing. He said the watershed management plan and agreement needs to be updated. Murrieta Councilmember Welsh suggested the watershed groups work with staff from both cities and make a recommendation regarding the watershed management plan. It was moved by Temecula Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to refer this item back to staff from both cities to work together on a recommendation. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 TEMECULA COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Mu~oz NOES: 0 TEMECULA COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: I TEMECULA COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall AYES: 5 MURRIETA COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 MURRIETA COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 MURRIETA COUNCILMEMBERS: Murrieta Mayor vanHaaster declared a recess at 9:00 P.M. at 9:15 P.M. Allen, Gilliss, Smith, Walsh, vanHeaster None None The meeting reconvened JCCMIN11130193 -3- 12109193 JOINT TEMI:CUI' AIMURRIETA CITY COUNCIL MINUTFS NOV;MBI:R ~0, 199-~ 2. Discussion of French Valley Airoort Master Plan Larry Markham, Chairman of Friends of French Valley Airport, provided an update on the status of the airport. He said the Friends of the French Valley Airport are working on ensuring the airport is maximized to its fullest potential while being a good neighbor to the surrounding environment. Ron Sullivan, 3rd District Aviation Commissioner, asked the Council and staff of both cities to support the airport master plan process. Temecula City Manager David Dixon suggested the City Council have a study session for staff to brief them on the airport master plan. CiW Manager Reoorts None Ciw Attorney Reoorts None City Council Reports Temecula Mayor Pro Tam Robarts asked for a status report of the joint traffic committee and the grant application. Staff replied the grant is in process and another joint meeting will be called. Adjournment It was moved by Murrieta Councilmember Walsh, seconded by Murrieta Councilmember Gilliss to adjourn at 9:40 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried with Temecula Councilmember Birdsall absent. The next regular meeting of the Murrieta City Council will be held on Tuesday, December 7, 1993, at the Murrieta City Hall Council Chambers. The next regular meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on Tuesday, December 14, 1993, at the Temecula Community Center. ATTEST: Mayor J. Sal Muftoz June S. Greek, City Clerk JCCMIN11130193 -4- I MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD DECEMBER 14, 1993 A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:21 PM in the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. Mayor J. Sal Muftoz presiding. PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsell, Parks, Robarts, Stone, Mufloz ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and City Clerk June S. Greek. EXECUTIVE SFSSION A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:40 PMo It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to adjourn to Executive Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a), Rancho Shopping Center v. City of Temecula and Pechanga Reservation v. City of Temecula, and 54956.9(b). The motion was unanimously carried. The 'meeting was reconvened at 7:18 PM in regular session with all members present. City Attorney Field announced that in addition to the items listed on the agenda, the City Council met in Executive Session regarding Government Code Section 54956.9(a), City of Temecula v. McDowall and 54956.9(c). City Attorney Field reported in a previous closed session the City Council authorized staff to enter into a settlement regarding a portion of Loma Linda Park, and the Council authorized a settlement of $10,000 which has been accepted and the lien has been released. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor John Flahiff, Christ's Church Presbyterian. PLEDGE OF AI LEGlANCE A Flag Ceremony was conducted by the Temecula Valley High School Junior ROTC, under the direction of Col. Staven Price, United States Air Force, Rat. Minutee~,l 2~,14't93 -1 - 01/04/94 City Council Minute Deeember 14. 1993 PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Mayor Mufioz read a previously mailed proclamation declaring November 28th through December 4th as "National Home Care Week". Mayor Mufioz presented Hydro-Row Filtration Systems, Inc. with a Certificate of Official welcome. Vice President of Marketing Michael Baird thanked the City Council and accepted the Certificate. Councilmember Parks announced the 4th and 5th Grade winners of the bicycle safety poster contests chosen by judges Mayor Pro Tam Robarts and Councilmember Parks. Councilmember Jeff Stone assisted as the Tie-breaker judge. The following were awarded bicycles for first place, safety helmets for second place and $50.00 Bonds for third place: 4th Grade Girls: 3rd Place 2nd Place 1 st Place Marlsol Gonzales, Temecula Elementary School Kathrine Pascua, Sparkman Elementary School Tracy Eckard, Rancho Elementary School 4th Grade Boys: 3rd Place 2nd Place I st Place Emmanuel Gonzales, Temecula Elementary School Makario Ruano, Temecula Elementary School Ryan Neral, Linfield Elementary School 5th Grade Girls: 3rd Place 2nd Place I st Place Jessica Leigh, Rancho Elementary School Corrie Brown, Nicolas Valley Elementary School Stacy Valentino, Nicolas Valley Elementary School 5th Grade Boys: 3rd Place 2nd Place 1 st Place James LeBlanc, Rancho Elementary School Chris Lynes, Rancho Elementary School Michael Kendall Redhawk Elementary School PUBLIC FORUM None CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Birdsall reported she just returned from attending the National League of Cities Conference in Orlando, Florida and felt it was a very successful conference. Councilmember Parks reported he attended a SCAG meeting and wanted the Council to be aware that the draft of the Regional Comprehensive Plan was approved for distribution and asked staff to make the plan available for Council review and input. Minutee%12%14%93 -2- 01/04/94 Ciw C~un~il Mir~ee Dx~er 14. 1993 Mayor Muf~oz asked for an update on the street widening project located at Mergerite Road and Rancho California Road. Director of Public Works Tim Serlet reported that Dennis Chinaeft, with Kernper, is putting together a street light program with estimates, and this information should be available as early as next week. Mayor Mufioz asked the a report be given on the status of the Winchester Bridge widening and Overland Overpass. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Birdsell stated she would abstain on Items 13 and 14 since she was not present for the first reading of the ordinances. Mayor Pro Tam Robarts asked that Item 6 be removed from the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Stone requested that Item No. 8 be removed from the Consent Calendar. Mayor Mu~oz removed Items 5, 9 and 11 from the Consent Calendar. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-4, 7, 1 O, 12, 13 and 14. The motion carried by the following vote with Councilmember Birdsell abstaining on Items 13 and 14: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz None None Parks, Robarts, Stone, 2 Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of October 26, 1993; IVlinutes%l 2%14~93 -3- 01/04/94 Ciw Coundl Minutes Deoember 14. 1993 2.2 2.3 Approve the Minutes of November 9, 1993; Approve the Minutes of November 23, 1993. 3 Resolution Aoorovino Iist of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93-99 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Combining Balance Sheets as of Seotember 30. 1993 and Statement of Revenues. Exoenditures and Chanoes in Fund Balance. and the Statement of Revenues. Fxoenses and Channes in Retained Earninos for the Three Months Ended Seotember 30. 1993 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheets as of September 30, 1993 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, and the Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1993; 4.2 Appropriate ;63,810 in Account 001-140-999-5248 "Consulting Services" to pay a 15% fee for a ;425,397 sales tax recovery. 4.3 Appropriate ;75,000 to Account 001-199-999-5610 "Equipment" for the purchase of video equipment to be located at the Community Recreation Center. Acceot Public Imorovements in Tract No. 22627-F RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 22627-F; 7.2 Authorize the reduction of Faithful Performance Street, and Sewer and Water System Securities; 7.3 Accept the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond riders; 7.4 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer end surety. Aeeedd121.413 4 01,R)4/14 City Council Minutes Deoemher 14. 1993 10. 12. l iefer Road Bridae end Rtreet ImDrovements Reimbursement Agreement With the Rancho California Water District for the Reconstruction of the 1 ~-Inch Water Main (PW93-O~) RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the reimbursement agreement with the Rancho California Water District for improvements in the amount of $20,500 to be constructed by the City's Contractor for the Liefer Road Bridge and Street Improvements Project (PW93-02). Senior Center Comoletion Costs RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve an additional appropriation of funds to apply to Senior Center Project PW92-03 in the amount of $24,500 to cover unanticipated costs incurred in completing the project. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 13. Second Readina of Ordinance 93-19 Reo8rdino Park Facility Use RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 93-19 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING PARK AND RECREATIONAL · FACILITY POUCIES AND REGULATIONS ESTABLISHING GENERAL OPERATION POLICIES GOVERNING SPECIAL USE PARKS, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 91-37 The motion carried by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: AYES: 4 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAIN: I Parks, Roberts, Stone, Mui~oz None None Birdsall Aelndl/121493 I 01.4~I,NMI, Clw Cmandl Minutes Deedx~ 14. 1993 14. Establishina Soeed Limits on Certain Streets Second Reading of Ordin. nce 93-~1 RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled; ORDINANCE NO, 93-21 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 12,02,010 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CBRTAIN STREETS The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks, Roberts, Stone, Muf~oz NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall Travel Policv Mayor Mufioz stated he noted an inconsistency between the staff report and the actual policy, on page three, paragraph A, regarding business travel within the state and out of state. Finance Officer Mary Jane McLamey stated the policy will be corrected to coincide with the staff report. It was moved by Mayor Muftoz, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve staff recommendation to receive and file travel policy. The motion was unanimously carried. Award of Vehicle I~ irchase Mayor Pro Tem Roberts asked why the bids did not include propane-ready vehicles. Finance Officer McLamey stated this is how all the bids have been handled in the past and special State funds are available for conversion costs. Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs asked why the lowest bidder was not awarded the bid. Ma. McLarney explained that the propane tank would not fit on the vehicle that was low bid. · lemle/121413 8 Ol/O4/ll Ciw Council Minute DeoMnber 14. 1993 RECESS Mayor Muf~oz called a recess at 8:19 PM. The meeting was reconvened following the previously scheduled Community Services District Meeting at 8:53 PM. PUBLIC HEARINGS 15. So,rce Reduction and Recycling ;:lement (SRRE) and the Household Hazardo-e Waste Element (HHWE) Senior Management Analyst Phyliss Ruse presented the staff report. Valerie Bonhard, representing the consulting firm of Kleinfelder, presented a brief report regarding the comprehensive planning document for waste management. Councilmember Parks asked that the public be re-educated regarding the City's recycling program. Mayor Pro Tam Robarts stated he discussed this matter with Phyliss Ruse and requested that educational information be included in the TCSD newsletter. Mayor Muftoz opened the public hearing st 9:05 PM. Hearing no requests to speak, Mayor Muf~oz closed the public hearing at 9:05 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve staff recommendation as follows: RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93-100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FINAL SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENT AND HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT AS PRESCRIBED BY THE CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1989 The motion was unanimously carried. 16. Soecific Plan No. 164, Amendment No..~ (PA93-0145) and Tentative Tract MaD No. 27827 (PA93-0144). Rorioaugh Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report, reading changes to Condition No. 59, in the event the developer constructs the median, it shall accommodate a left turn pocket into Roripaugh Road. (p. 3 of staff report.) · ~mle/121413 I 01,q)4JI4 City C~ur.:il Min~Te~ December 14. 1993 Mayor Muf~oz opened the public hearing at 9:20 PM. D. "lan" Wilson, 30225 Sierra Madre Drive, addressed the Council in opposition to the project as currently proposed, listing the transfer of density and conversion of zoning, and proposed permanent restrooms on the park site. Susan Souse, 40123 Cannee Court, opposed the project listing density transfer and the perk as major areas of concern. She also objected to the "alley" style construction that is being proposed. Gary Souse, 40123 Cannee Court, spoke in opposition to the project, specifically due to the "alley" type construction proposed. Joe Axton, 30169 Sierra Madre, spoke in opposition to the zone change and stated he feels this area will revert to mainly rental property. Ed Mowles, 27595 Dandelion Court, President of Roripaugh Homeowners Association, voiced his opposition to the project and stated he feels density has been increased instead of decreased. He stated that proper notification was not given for this public hearing and this item should be continued until proper notification has been obtained. RECESS Mayor Mufioz called a recess at 9:38 PM to change the tape. The meeting was reconvened at 9:40 PM with all members present. Sanford Edward, representing the applicant, Roripaugh Ranches, Inc., Box 2, explained this project is the product of 18 months of work with staff, to design a project that best met the needs of the community. He stated this new design, called "Neo- Traditional, has been successful in Irvine, San Diego County and the alleys are governed by strict CC&Rs. He stated the park, with permanent restroom facilities, was something the City requested. Councilmember Stone suggested staff re-notice this project to give all those who wish to voice an opinion the opportunity to do so. Mayor Mu~oz closed the public hearing at 10:04 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tam Robarts to extend the meeting 11:00 PM. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Robarts, seconded by Councilmember Stone to continue the public hearing to January 11, 1993. City Attorney Field suggested the public hearing be re-opened end continued to the meeting of January 25, 1993 to allow re-noticing of the project. ~ealde/t21413 10 01R)4/14 City C~.andl Minute Deoember 14. 1993 Mayor Pro Tam Robarts amended his motion, Councilmember Stone amended his second to continue the public hearing to the meeting of January 25, 1994 and directed staff to re-notice the public hearing and notify all homeowners associations for neighboring tracts. The motion was unanimously carried. RECESS Mayor Muftoz called a recess at 10:25 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 10:30 PM. Hearing no objections, Mayor Mufioz reordered the agenda to accommodate those wishing to speak on Item No. 25. 25. Discussion of Sion Ordinance Director of Planning Gary Thornhill stated staff did not prepare a formal staff report on this item, but were requesting direction from the Council. Bruce Sparks, 27464 Commerce Center Drive, owner of Sparks Furniture, thanked members of the Council for offering small business loans to aid businesses in obtaining permanent signs, but requested that businesses simply be left alone and asked that enforcement of the sign ordinance be suspended and the ordinance rewritten to allow more freedom for business owners. Minnie Jimenez, 41946 Main Street, owner of Natural Looking Nails, stated without a banner, her business will not survive and asked that the sign ordinance be re-written. She presented the City Clerk with signature of business owners in opposition to the sign ordinance. Jeanne Kearns, 27625 Jefferson Avenue, Ste 100, presented the City Clerk with signatures of businesses against the sign ordinance and stated businesses did not desire loans or further debt, but requested a re-working of the sign ordinance. Don Gago, 41973 6th Street, addressed the Council in favor of re-writing the sign ordinance to allow more freedom for business owners. Councilmember Parks stated the City has a temporary sign ordinance because the county ordinance did not allow any temporary signs. He stated he wants to be sensitive to businesses but there need to be conditions governing these temporary signs, and suggested that periods of time be extended for temporary signs when a permanent sign is applied for. Director of Planning Gary Thornhill made the following suggestions. With respect to temporary signs, the current ordinance requirement is 45 days with one 30 day extension. If Council desires, this could be modified to allow interim signs for 6 months, with a possible extension of 6 months. /4eede/121413. 11 QIR34/14 Ci'tv Council Minutee Deoembef 14, 1993 e Require business owner to apply for 8 permanent sign prior to permitting a second extension. With regard to events, reduce requirement of time between events to 30 days instead of 60 day period. 4. Allow two temporary signs, back to beck. Councilmember Parks suggested this be agendized and recommended a lead person be appointed from the business community to work with staff. Mr. Sparks stated he would be willing to represent the business community end work with staff. City Attorney Field advised the Council that since the current sign ordinance is a zoning ordinance, amendments must go first to the Planning Commission, and suggested that this matter be referred to the Planning Commission to expedite the process. Mayor Muf~oz requested that no citations be issued during this period, but requests for voluntary compliance continue. Chief Building Official Tony Elmo asked that the enforcement program be suspended until this matter is resolved, stating his desire is to protect the credibility of the Code Enforcement Officer. Councilmember Birdsall stated she is in favor of reviewing this matter once more, but three years ago businesses were involved in drafting the current sign ordinance, and she hopes that this matter will not continue to surface every several years. She asked the business community to "police themselves" to avoid problems that were present three years ago before the sign ordinance took effect. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to refer this matter to the Planning Commission to conduct hearings regarding amendments to the ordinance and further directed staff to waive enforcement for a period of 90 days. The motion was unanimously carried. 17. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to continue the meeting until 12:00 AM. The motion was unanimously carried. Planning Aoolication No. 93-0179. Amendment No. I - Second unit Permit - Aoneal of Conditions of Aooroval No. 31 and 4~ (reouirement for the all-weather access to the second unit- as soecificallv defined bv the Deoartment of Public Works) Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report. Aeend~121413 12 01/0414 City Counoil IVinUTN December 14. 1~3 Mayor Muf~oz opened the public hearing at 11: 14 PM. Paul Toomey, 34634 C81imine Road, Yucaipa, stated this is a typical second unit and it has come as a surprise to the applicants that an all weather road is required and requested that the interpretation of an all-weather road be reviewed. Mayor Muftoz closed the public hearing at 11:25 PM. Councilmember Parks stated he does not have a problem with a dirt road in this area and stated he feels that a ~20,000 improvement is not necessary. Mayor Muf~oz stated that if s dirt road is allowed, he feels the City should be held harmless in case of emergency. City Attorney Field asked if the Council wanted to amend Condition 42 to change the definition of "all weather" road. Director of Planning Gary Thornhill stated (1) he needs direction for future applications to be consistent with approvals, and (2) if second units will be permitted without all- weather access, the ordinance needs to be amended. City Attorney Field suggested reopening the public hearing and continuing this item for 30 days. Mayor Muf~oz re-opened the public hearing at 11:37 PM. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tam Robarts, seconded by Councilmember Stone to continue the public hearing to the meeting of January 11, 1994 and directed staff to prepare an ordinance amendment to address defining a satisfactory surface material for access to second dwelling units. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Robarts, Stone, Mu~oz NOES: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Mayor Muf~oz reordered the agenda to hear Item 22 out of order. Mayor Muf~oz announced that he and Councilmember Stone would abstain due to a potential conflict of interest. .AgeIda/121413 13 01/04jt4 CAw Courtoil Minute Deeember 14. 1993 22. Reauest for Fee Waiver for Rod Run 1994 - Old Town Merchants Associatioo Director of Planning Thornhill provided the Council with an estimate of fees that are requested to he waived, with · total of $8,750.00. Mike Thesing, 30291 Via Briss, Chairperson of Temecula 94 Rod Run, requested that fees be waived and requested a donation of ;1 ,500.00 to provide portabletoilets for the event. He stated that a percentage of profits will be donated to the Schriners Hospital. Councilmember Birdsell voiced s concern for profits being donated to a charity located outside of the City. RECESS Mayor Pro Tem Robarts called a brief recess at 11:45 PM to change the tape. The meeting reconvened at 11:45 PM. Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs asked the status of the loan to the Old Town Merchants Association, and stated it was his understanding that any profits from last year were to be used to repay the loan. Finance Officer Mary Jane McLarney advised that no repayment has been received by the City on previous loans to the Old Town Merchants Association. John Coute, 3083 Pepper, Highland, stated this is a premier event in Southern California and events are always better received if s charity is involved. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to extend the meeting until 12:30 AM. The motion was unanimously carried. Councilmember Birdsall suggested giving a ;5,000 sponsorship from the City's promotional budget, instead of arbitrarily waiving fees which have no set dollar amount. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve an allocation of $5,000 from the Promotional Budget for sponsorship of the event. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsell, Parks, Robarts NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mul%oz, Stone Aeende/121493 . 14 01/iNNS PRESENTATIONS\ PROCLAMATIONS The City of Tetnecula PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the Temeeula Valley has long been served by a fine member of the agricultural community, and WHEREAS, he was the founder and first president of the Arabian Horse Association of Temecula; and WHEREAS, this citizen has served the greater Temecula Valley as a member of the San Jacinto College Boaxd of Trustees; and WHEREAS, he has also been an active participant and member of The Friends of French Valley Airport, dedicated to promoting the local airport and the promotion of safe air traffic and travel within the Temecula Valley; and WHEREAS, his interest and concern with protecting and preserving good water quality within the valley has led him to serve on the Advisory Committee of the Rancho California Water District; and WHEREAS, he has actively pursued the cause of good government by being a generous supporter of local, state and national political leaden, NOW, THEREFORE, I, J. Sal Mu~oz, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim January 11, 1994 to be "JOHN AFFOLTER DAY" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 30th day of December, 1993. J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: # SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning January 11, 1994 Long-Term Habitat Conservation Ran for the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat PREPARED BY: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner BACKGROUND: In 1990, the City of Temecula became a member of the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency (RCHCA) Joint Powers Authority. The RCHCA is the organization responsible for implementing the Section l O(a) Permit and the Short-Term Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) for the Stephens Kangaroo Rat (SKR). The HCP is administered through an Agency Agreement with the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) and a Section 10(a) Permit from the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). DISCUSSION: The permanent Long-term HCP will replace the RCHCAs existing SKR conservation program and take provisions of SKR under the Short-Term HCP. The permanent HCP would be valid for 30 years and would authorize incidental take of SKR on lands within the jurisdictions of the RCHCA members. It is important to note that the authorization provided by permanent HCP would only cover incidental take of SKR. The HCP would not cover any other federally or state listed species, including but not limited to the coastal California gnatcatcher. The primary elements of the HCP plan will be: Establishment of Core Reserve Areas - Approximately 12,500 acres of SKR habitat is in five SKR core reserves that would be established, managed, and expanded under the permanent plan. At least 2,500 acres of SKR habitat is to be added to the core reserve system over time through acquisitions, dedications and habitat enhancement and restoration. R:~S%STA~CC 1/~/94 ~i~ Habitat Mitioation - One acre of replacement habitat will be acquired and conserved by the RCHCA for every one acre of occupied SKR habitat taken under the new permit and agreement. If acres of take exceed acres of replacement habitat by more than 10 percent, the City'e ability to authorize incidental take of SKR will be suspended until sufficient acreage of repl~bcement habitat has been acquired. Mitigation Fee. The $1,950/acre mitigation fee currently collected in the short- term HCP would be continued to be collected. The fee would be adjusted annually based on the consumer price index (CPI). When the 2~500 acre performance standard is met, the habitat replacement and mitigation fee requirements will be re-evaluated by the RCHCA, USFWS and CDFG. Incidental Take - If a project involves take of 100 or more acres of SKR habitat, the City would be required to provide the RCHCA, CDFG and USFWS 30 days advance notice prior to City action on the project. The advanced notice would allow the RCHCA, CDFG and USFWS to review and comment on large scale projects prior to City Action. If · 100 acre project would exceed the 10 percent threshold mentioned above, the City would be unable to authorize the take until the 10 percent margin is restored. For General Plan Amendments (GPA) within ½ mile of a Core Reserve Area, 30 day advance notice to the RCHCA, CDFG and USFWS would be required. The ½ mile provision is relevant in that the City's Sphere of Influence is adjacent to the Lake Skinner Core Reserve Area. The plan does not specify what level of review would be provided by the RCHCA, CDFG end USFWS concerning GPAs. Please review the attached draft HCP and provide staff with your comments and cor~cerns to include in the City's official response the document. ATTACHMENT: Habitat Conservation Plan for the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat in Western Riverside County, California -Volume I ITEM 1 ITEM NO. MINUTES OF A SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL AND THE MURRIETA CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 1993 A special meeting of the Temecula City Council and the Murrieta City Council was called to order on Tuesday, November 30, 1993, 6:30 P.M., at the Murrieta City Hall Council Chambers, 26442 Beckman Court, Murriete, California. City of Murrieta Mayor Jack vanHaaster presiding. PRESENT: 4 MURRIETA COUNCILMEMBERS: Allen, Smith, Walsh, vanHaaster ABSENT: I MURRIETA COUNCILMEMBERS: Gilliss PRESENT: 4 TEMECULA COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks, Roberts, Stone, Mufioz ABSENT: I TEMECULA COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall Also present were Murriete City Manager Jack Smith, Temecula City Manager David Dixon, Murrieta City Clerk Kay Vinson and Temecule City Clerk June Greek. PUBLIC COMMENT Jeanne Gillen, 38160 Avenida La Cresta, Murrieta, said she has always enjoyed the mountain view from the both the 15 and 215 freeway, however, since the construction of the new Homebase store in Murrieta, this view has been obstructed. Ms. Giilen asked members from both City Councils to give the hillside views consideration in future planning. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. Discussion of Santa Maroarita River/San Luis Rev Watershed Manaoement Plan Murrieta City Manager Jack Smith summarized the staff report. Murrieta City Mayor vanHaaster opened the public hearing at 7:10 P.M. Jim Mocalis, 42290 ivy Street, Murrieta, representing the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, offered to provide information upon request by both Councils. Peter Archuleta, 3100 Vista Way, Hemst, representing the Santa Margarita/San Luis Rey Watershed Planning Agency, provided a summary of the establishment and purpose of the Santa Margarita/San Luis Rey Watershed Planning Agency. JCCMIN11130/93 -1 - 12/0~193 JOINT TEMI=CULAIMURRIETA CITY COUNCIL MINUTFS NOVFMBFR 30, 1993 Murrieta Planning Director Stephen Harding reviewed the staff report, outlining alternatives to avoid duplication of effort and to maximize resources. Paul Romero, 4600 Crestmore Road, Riverside, representing the County of Riverside Regional Park & Open Space District, answered questions regarding the policy committee for the Santa Margarita River Watershed Management Program. Temecula Mayor Mufioz asked who participated in the Board meetings and if there were any concerns expressed by the Board in joining the agency. Mr. Romero said that at the last meeting the Board addressed the issue and expressed their support of the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) participation, but want to continue with the ongoing activities of the County Task Force. Murrieta Councilmember Gilliss arrived at 7:30 P.M. Mayor Pro Tem Robarts asked where the funds for running the agency come from. Mr. Archuleta explained the funds come from the member agencies. Mr. Archuleta said at the last meeting the Commission approved an assessment for the members to fund the scope of work for the watershed plan. He said he feels there needs to be a coordinated effort in watershed planning, since there is no money for duplicated efforts. Mr. Archuleta encouraged both Councils to join the JPA. David Bartlett, 24197 Via Prima Vera, Murrieta, said he feels the Santa Margarita River Watershed Management Plan is an ad-hoc committee attempting to take property rights. He said he feels the Councilmembers have a sacred trust to protect the rights of the property owners. John Bell, 37527 Vineyard Knoll, Murrieta, concurred with Mr. Bartlett's concerns. He said the Committee formed by County Supervisor Bob Buster is not represented by members of the public, land owners or business owners. Mr. Bell submitted a list of the members to the City Clerk. Mr. Bell said he did not support the City Council entering into the JPA. Jeanne Gillen, 38160 Avenida La Cresta, Murrieta, said she has served on the Committee as a volunteer as well as many other commissions and committees. She clarified it was Walt Abraham who formed the Santa Margarita Watershed Committee. Ms. Gillen said she is concerned there has been no recreation element to the plan and no input from the citizenary. A letter was received from W.H. Rawlings, Murrieta, encouraging both City Councils not to give responsibilities regarding watershed planning to a JPA that has no private interest participation. Temecula Mayor Mu~ioz asked for comments from staff. JCCMIN 11130193 - 2-12/09/93 JOINT T;:M;:CULA/MURRIETA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 30, 1993 Temecula Planning Director Gary Thornhill suggested the Councils allow staff members to work together on a recommendation. Murrieta Planning Director Steve Harding agreed with Director Thornhill. He said the purpose of tonights meeting was for staff to receive input from the Council. Councilmember Allen said there are worthwhile and needed flood control problems that are endangering Historic Old Town Murrieta. Councilmember Allen said he would prefer dealing with a formal and legal authority. Temecula Mayor Mu~ioz said he participated on the policy committee. He said he would support continuing to move ahead with the current management program, inviting the JPA to give input from their experience over the past 20 years. Temecula Councilmember Parks said he is concerned about creating a new committee when there is still another committee existing. He said the watershed management plan and agreement needs to be updated. Murrieta Councilmember Walsh suggested the watershed groups work with staff from both cities and make a recommendation regarding the watershed management plan. It was moved by Temecula Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to refer this item back to staff from both cities to work together on a recommendation. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 TEMECULA COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks, Roberts, Stone, Mufioz NOES: 0 TEMECULA COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: I TEMECULA COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 MURRIETA COUNCILMEMBERS: MURRIETA COUNCILMEMBERS: MURRIETA COUNCILMEMBERS: Allen, Gilliss, Smith, Walsh, vanHaaster Norle None Murrieta Mayor vanHaaster declared a recess at 9:00 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:15 P.M. JCCMIN11130/93 -3- 12/09/93 JOINT TEM;CUI '~/MURRIETA CITY COUNCIl MINUTFS NOVI:MBFR 30. 1993 2. Discussion of French Valley Airoort Master Plan Larry Markham, Chairman of Friends of French Valley Airport, provided an update on the status of the airport. He said the Friends of the French Valley Airport are Working on ensuring the airport is maximized to its fulleat potential while being a good neighbor to the surrounding environment. Ron Sullivan, 3rd District Aviation Commissioner, asked the Council and staff of both cities to support the airport master plan process. Temecula City Manager David Dixon suggested the City Council have a study 'session for staff to brief them on the airport master plan. City Manaoer RePorts None City Attorney Reoorts None City Council Reoorts Temecula Mayor Pro Tern Roberts asked for a status report of the joint traffic committee and the grant application. Staff replied the grant is in process and another joint meeting will be called. Adjournment It was moved by Murrieta Councilmember Walsh, seconded by Murrieta Councilmember Gilllea to adjourn at 9:40 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried with Temecula Councilmember Birdsall absent. The next regular meeting of the Murrista City Council will be held on Tuesday, December 7, 1993, at the Murrieta City Hall Council Chambers. The next regular meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on Tuesday, December 14, 1993, at the Temecula Community Center. ATTEST: Mayor J. Sal Mur~oz June S. Greek, City Clerk JCCMIN11130193 -4- 12/09/93 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD DECEMBER 14, 1993 A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:21 PM in the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. Mayor J. Sal Mu~oz presiding. PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Mufioz ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and City Clerk June S. Greek. EXECUTIVE SI=SSION A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:40 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Counciimember Stone to adjourn to Executive Session pursuant to Govemment Code SectiOn 54956.9(a), Rancho Shopping Center v. City of Temecula and Pechanga Reservation v. City of Temecula, and 54956.9(b). The motion was unanimously carried. The 'meeting was reconvened at 7:18 PM in regular session with all members present. City Attorney Field announced that in addition to the items listed on the agenda, the City Council met in Executive Session regarding Government Code Section 54956.9(a), City of Temecula v. McDowell and 54956.9(c). City Attorney Field reported in a previous closed session the City Council authorized staff to enter into a settlement regarding a portion of Loma Linda Park, and the Council authorized a settlement of $10,000 which has been accepted and the lien has been released. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor John Flahiff, Christ's Church Presbyterian. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A Flag Ceremony was conducted by the Temecule Valley High School Junior ROTC, under the direction of Col. Steven Price, United States Air Force, Ret. Minutes%,12%14%93 -1 - 01/04/94 Ciw Council Minute Deoembqr 14. 1993 PRESENTATIONS/ PROC~ AMATIONS Mayor Muftoz read · previously mailed proclamation declaring November 28th through December 4th as "National Home Care Week". Mayor Mufioz presented Hydro-Flow Filtration Systems, Inc. with a Certificate of Official welcome. Vice President of Marketing Michael Baird thanked the City Council and accepted the Certificate. Councilmember Parks announced the 4th and 5th Grade winners of the bicycle safety poster contests chosen by judges Mayor Pro Tam Robarts and Councilmember Parks. Councilmember Jeff Stone assisted as the Tie-breaker judge. The following were awarded bicycles for first place, safety helmets for second place and $50.00 Bonds for third place: 4th Grade Girls: 3rd Place 2nd Place I st Place Marisol Gonzales, Temecula Elementary School Kathrine Pascua, Sparkman Elementary School Tracy Eckard, Rancho Elementary School 4th Grade Boys: 3rd Place 2nd Place I st Place Emmanuel Gonzales, Temecula Elementary School Makerio Ruano, Temecula Elementary School Ryan Nerel, Linfield Elementary School 5th Grade Girls: 3rd Place 2nd Place I st Race Jessice Leigh, Rancho Elementary School Corrie Brown, Nicolas Valley Elementary School Stacy Valentino, Nicolas Valley Elementary School 5th Grade Boys: 3rd Place 2nd Place I st Place James LeBlanc, Rancho Elementary School Chris Lynes, Rancho Elementary School Michael Kendall Redhawk Elementary School PUBLIC FORUM None CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Birdsall reported she just returned from attending the National League of Cities Conference in Orlando, Florida and felt it was · very successful conference. Councilmember Parks reported he attended a SCAG meeting and wanted the Council to be aware that the draft of the Regional Comprehensive Plan was approved for distribution and asked staff to make the plan available for Council review and input. Minutee%l 2%14%93 -2- 01/04/14 City Counoil Minme~ Deeember 14. 1993 Mayor Mufioz asked for an ulxlate on the street widening Woject located at Margarita Road and Rancho California Road. Director of Public Works Tim Serlet reported that Dennis ChiMeif, with Kemper, is putting together a street light program with estimates, and this information should be available as eedy as next week. Mayor Mufioz asked the a report be given on the status of the Winchester Bridge widening and Overland Overpass. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Birdsall stated she would abstain on Items 13 and 14 since she was not present for the first reading of the ordinances. Mayor Pro Tern Robarts asked that Item 6 be removed from the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Stone requested that Item No. 8 be removed from the Consent Calendar. Mayor Mufioz removed Items 5, 9 and 11 from the Consent Calendar. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-4, 7, 1 O, 12, 13 and 14. The motion carried by the following vote with Councilmember Birdsell abstaining on Items 13 and 14: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsell, Mufioz None None Parks, Roberts, Stone, 2 Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of October 26, 1993; Minutee%l 2~14%93 -3- 01/04/94 CiW Council Minutes De~b~lr 14. 1993 2.2 2.3 Approve the Minutes of November 9, 1993; Approve the Minutes of November 23, 1993. 3 Resolution Aoorovino list of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93-99 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Combin,no Balance Sheets as of Sentember 30. 1993 and Statement of Revenues. Exoenditures and Chanaes in Fund Balance. and the Statement of Revenues. FXoenses and Channes in Retained Earninas for the Three Months Ended Sentember 30. 1993 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheets as of September 30, 1993 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, and the Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1993; 4.2 Appropriate ~63,810 in Account 001-140-999-5248 "Consulting Services" to pay a 15% fee for a $425,397 sales tax recovery. 4.3 Appropriate $75,000 to Account 001-199-999-5610 "Equipment" for the purchase of video equipment to be located at the Community Recreation Center. Acceot Public Imorovements in Tract No. ~2627-F RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 22627-F; 7.2 Authorize the reduction of Faithful Performance Street, and Sewer and Water System Securities; 7.3 Accept the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond riders; 7.4 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and surety. Alendefl~1413 4 01~4/14 CiTy C~r~il Minutee De~n~-r 14. 1993 10. 12. liefar Road Rridne and Street Imorovements Reimbursement Anreement With the Rancho California Water District for the Reconstruction of the 1 ~-Inch Water Main (PW93-O~) RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the reimbursement agreement with the Rancho California Water District for improvements in the amount of $20,500 to be constructed by the City's Contractor for the Liefer Road Bridge and Street Improvements Project (PW93-02). Senior Center Comoletion Costs RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve an additional appropriation of funds to apply to Senior Center Project PW92-03 in the amount of ;24,500 to cover unanticipated costs incurred in completing the project. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 13. Second Readino of Ordinance 93-19 Regardino Park Facility Use RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 93-19 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING PARK AND RECREATIONAL · FACILITY POLICIES AND REGULATIONS ESTABLISHING GENERAL OPERATION POLICIES GOVERNING SPECIAL USE PARKS, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 91-37 The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks, Roberts, Stone, Mufioz NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall leenda/121413 6 01/04/14 City Coundl Mirlutee Deomd)M' 14. 1993 14. Second ReKlinq of Ordinance 93-~)1 RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Fstablishing Seed limits on Certain Streets Adopt an ordinance emitled; ORDINANCE NO. 93-21 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 12.02.010 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS The motion carried by the following vote: : AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Mutioz NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall Travel Policy Mayor Muf~oz stated he noted an inconsistency between the staff report and the actual policy, on page three, paragraph A, regarding business travel within the state and out of state. Finance Officer Mary Jane McLamey stated the policy will be corrected to coincide with the staff report. It was moved by Mayor Muftoz, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve staff recommendation to receive and file travel policy. The motion was unanimously carried. Award of Vehicle Purchase Mayor Pro Tem Robarts asked why the bids did not include propane-ready vehicles. Finance Officer McLarney stated this is how all the bids have been handled in the past and special State funds are available for conversion costs. Mayor Pro Tem Robarts asked why the lowest bidder was not awarded the bid. Ma. McLarney explained that the propane tank would not fit on the vehicle that was low bid. Jieende/121413 e ol/04/14 Ciw Coundl MinuTe~ Deoember 14. 1993 RECESS Mayor Mu~oz called a recess at 8:19 PM. The meeting was reconvened following the previously scheduled Community Services District Meeting at 8:53 PM. PUBLIC HEARINGS 15. So-rce Reduction and Recvclino Flement (SRRF) and the Household Hazardous Waste Element IHHWE) Senior Management Analyst Phyliss Ruse presented the staff report. Valerie Bonhard, representing the consulting firm of Kleinfelder, presented a brief report regarding the comprehensive planning document for waste management. Councilmember Parks asked that the public be re-educated regarding the City's recycling program. Mayor Pro Tem Roberts stated he discussed this matter with Phyliss Ruse and requested that educational information be included in the TCSD newsletter. Mayor Muftoz opened the public hearing at 9:05 PM. Hearing no requests to speak, Mayor Mufioz closed the public hearing at 9:05 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve staff recommendation as follows: RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93-100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FINAL SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENT AND HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT AS PRESCRIBED BY THE CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1989 The motion was unanimously carried. 16. Soecific Plan No. 164. Amendment No..~ (PA93-O145) and Tentative Tract MaD No. 27827 (PA93-O144). Rorioau0h Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report, reading changes to Condition No. 59, in the event the developer constructs the median, it shall accommodate a left turn pocket into Roripaugh Road. (p. 3 of staff report.) /4erie/121413' · 01/04/14 City Council Minute Deoem~r, 14. 1993 Mayor Mufioz opened the public hearing at 9:20 PM. D. "lan" Wilson, 30225 Sierra Madre Drive, addressed the Council in opposition to the project as currently proposed, listing the transfer of density and conversion of izoning, and proposed permanent restrooms on the park site. Susan Souse, 40123 Cannee Court, opposed the project listing density transfer and the perk as major areas of concern. She also objected to the "alley" style construction that is being proposed. Gary Souse, 40123 Cannee Court, spoke in opposition to the project, specifically due to the "alley" type construction proposed. Joe Axton, 30169 Sierra Madre, spoke in opposition to the zone change and stated he feels this area will revert to mainly rental property. Ed Mowlea, 27595 Dandelion Court, President of Roripaugh Homeowners Association, voiced his opposition to the project and stated he feels density has been increased instead of decreased. He stated that proper notification was not given for this public hearing and this item should be continued until proper notification has been obtained. RECESS Mayor Muf~oz called a recess at 9:38 PM to change the tape. The meeting was reconvened at 9:40 PM with all members present. Sanford Edward, representing the applicant, Roripaugh Ranches, Inc., Box 2, explained this project is the product of 18 months of work with staff, to design a project that best met the needs of the community. He stated this new design, called "Neo- Traditional, has been successful in Irvine, San Diego County and the alleys are governed by strict CC&Rs. He stated the park, with permanent restroom facilities, was something the City requested. Councilmember Stone suggested staff re-notice this project to give all those who wish to voice an opinion the opportunity to do so. Mayor Mu~oz closed the public hearing at 10:04 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tam Robarts to extend the meeting 11:00 PM. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tam Robarts, seconded by Councilmember Stone to continue the public hearing to January 11, 1993. City Attorney Field suggested the public hearing be re-opened and continued to the meeting of January 25, 1993 to allow re-noticing of the project. AeeMef121413 10 01/04/14 City Courtoil Minute~ Deoeftter 14. 1993 Mayor Pro Tam Roberrs amended his motion, Councilmember Stone amended his second to continue the public hearing to the meeting of January 25, 1994 and directed staff to re-notice the public hearing and notify all homeowners associations for neighboring tracts. The motion was unanimously carried. RECESS Mayor Mufioz called a recess at 10:25 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 10:30 PM. Hearing no objections, Mayor Mufioz reordered the agenda to accommodate those wishing to speak on Item No. 25. 25. Discussion of Sian Ordinance Director of Planning Gary Thornhill stated staff did not prepare a formal staff report on this item, but were requesting direction from the Council. Bruce Sparks, 27464 Commerce Center Drive, owner of Sparks Furniture, thanked members of the Council for offering small business loans to aid businesses in obtaining permanent signs, but requested that businesses simply be left alone and asked that enforcement of the sign ordinance be suspended and the ordinance rewritten to allow more freedom for business owners. Minnie Jimenez, 41946 Main Street, owner of Natural Looking Nails, stated without a banner, her business will not survive and asked that the sign ordinance be re-written. She presented the City Clerk with signature of business owners in opposition to the sign ordinance. Jeanne Kearns, 27625 Jefferson Avenue, Ste 100, presented the City Clerk with signatures of businesses against the sign ordinance and stated businesses did not desire loans or further debt, but requested a re-working of the sign ordinance. Don Gago, 41973 6th Street, addressed the Council in favor of re-writing the sign ordinance to allow more freedom for business owners. Councilmember Parks stated the City has a temporary sign ordinance because the county ordinance did not allow any temporary signs. He stated he wants to be sensitive to businesses but there need to be conditions governing these temporary signs, and suggested that periods of time be extended for temporary signs when a permanent sign is applied for. Director of Planning Gary Thornhill made the following suggestions. With respect to temporary signs, the current ordinance requirement is 45 days with one 30 day extension. If Council desires, this could be modified to allow interim signs for 6 months, with a possible extension of 6 months. /~enda/121413. 11 01RN/14 Ciw Coun4:il Minute ~ 14. 1993 Require business owner to apply for a permanent sign prior to permitting a second extension, e With regard to events, reduce requirement of time between events to 30 days instead of 60 day period. 4. Allow two temporary signs, back to back. Councilmember Parks suggested this be agendized and recommended a lead person be appointed from the business community to work with staff. Mr. Sparks stated he would be willing to represent the business community and work with staff.. City Attorney Field advised the Council that since the current sign ordinance is a zoning ordinance, amendments must go first to the Planning Commission, and suggested that this matter be referred to the Planning Commission to expedite the process. Mayor Muftoz requested that no citations be issued during this period, but requests for voluntary compliance continue. Chief Building Official Tony Elmo asked that the enforcement program be suspended until this matter is resolved, stating his desire is to protect the credibility of the Code Enforcement Officer. Councilmember Birdsall stated she is in favor of reviewing this matter once more, but three years ago businesses were involved in drafting the current sign ordinance, and she hopes that this matter will not continue to surface every several years. She asked the business community to "police themselves" to avoid problems that were present three years ago before the sign ordinance took effect. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to refer this matter to the Planning Commission to conduct hearings regarding amendments to the ordinance and further directed staff to waive enforcement for s period of 90 days. The motion was unanimously carried. 17. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to continue the meeting until 12:00 AM. The motion was unanimously carried. Planning ADolication No. 93-0179. Amendment No. I - Second unit Permit -Aooeal of Conditions of Aooroval No. 31 and 4~ {reauirement for the all-weather accels to the second unit- as soecificallv defined by the Department of Public Works) Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report. Aeendef121493 12 01/04/14 CAtv Coundl Minute December 14. 1993 Mayor Muf~oz opened the public hearing at 11:14 PM. Paul Toomay, 34634 Calimine Road, Yucaipe, stated this is a typical second unit and it has come as a surprise to the applicants that an all weather road is required and requested that the interpretation of an all-weather road be reviewed. Mayor Mui~oz closed the public hearing at 11:25 PM. Councilmember Parks stated he does not have a problem with a dirt road in this area and stated he feels that a $20,000 improvement is not necessary. Mayor Mur~oz stated that if a dirt road is allowed, he feels the City should be held harmless in case of emergency. City Attorney Field asked if the Council wanted to amend Condition 42 to change the definition of "all weather" road. Director of Planning Gary Thornhill stated ( 1 ) he needs direction for future applications tO be consistent with approvals, and (2) if second units will be permitted without all- Weather access, the ordinance needs to be amended. ;l~aA;tso. rney Field suggested reopening the public hearing and continuing this item for Mayor Mufioz re-opened the public hearing at 11:37 PM. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Robarts, seconded by Councilmember Stone to Continue the public hearing to the meeting of January 11, 1994 and directed staff to prepare an ordinance amendment to address defining a satisfactory surface material for access to second dwelling units. ~he motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 NOES: I COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Robarts, Stone, Mur~oz Parks ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Mayor Muftoz reordered the agenda to hear Item 22 out of order. Mayor Muf~oz announced that he and Councilmember Stone would abstain due to a potential conflict of interest. Agend~/121411 13 01/04/14 City Couf~l Minute Deeember 14, 1913 22. Reauest for Fee Waiver for Rod Run 1994 - Old Town Merchants Associatiqn Director of Planning Thornhill provided the Council with an estimate of fees 'that are requested to be waived, with a total of $8,750.00. Mike Thesing, 30291 Via Brisa, Chairperson of Temecula 94 Rod Run, requested that fees be waived and requested a donation of 81 ,500.00 to provide portablet0ilets for the event. He stated that a percentage of profits will be donated to the Schriners Hospital. Councilmember Birdsall voiced e concern for profits being donated to a charity located outside of the City. RECESS Mayor Pro Tam Roberrs called a brief recess at 11:45 PM to change the tape. The meeting reconvened at 11:45 PM, Mayor Pro Tam Roberrs asked the status of the loan to the Old Town Merchants Association, and stated it was his understanding that any profits from last year were to be used to repay the loan. Finance Officer Mary Jane McLamey advised that no repayment has been received by the City on previous loans to the Old Town Merchants Association, John Couta, 3083 Pepper, Highland, stated this is a premier event in Southern California and events are always better received if a charity is involved. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to extend the meeting until 12:30 AM. The motion was unanimously carried. Councilmember Birdsall suggested giving · $5,000 sponsorship from the City's promotional budget, instead of arbitrarily waiving fees which have no set dollar amount. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve an allocation of $5,000 from the Promotional Budget for sponsorship of the event. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Robarts NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mufioz, Stone ,l~eenk/121413 · 14 01)04/14 City Council Minutes December 14. 1993 Chairperson Ron Parks reopened RDA Meeting. City Attorney Field announced that the public hearings by the City Council and Redevelopment Agency would be heard currently. Action of the Redevelopment Agency is recorded in the Redevelopment Agency Minutes. 18. DiSDOSitiOn and Development Aoreement Between the Redevelooment Aoencv -Citv of Temecule and the Donna L. Reeves Trust U.T.D. 7-25-93 City Attorney Field presented the joint staff reports. He announced that in addition to the staff report, discussions were entertained to enter into an option agreement which would allow Reeves to repurchase the Jefferson Road property at $2 million dollars for up to 60 days prior to expiration of 12 months. He explained that during a 10 month period, the City would have the ability to market the site with Reeves having the right of first refusal. Mayor Mur~oz opened the public hearing at 12:17 AM. Mr. Aaron Jacoby, 355 S. Grand Avenue, 31st Floor, Los Angeles, representing the Reeves Group, stated this additional agreement allows the Reeves group to help the City find a buyer, He stated this action allows for the expansion of sales capability to approximately 250-300 cars per month. Dave Kennedy, applicant, stated the business function will be moved to the Ynez Site, and the Company goal is to get full operation moved as soon as possible. Mayor Mur~oz closed the public hearings at 12:25 AM. It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve staff recommendation as follows: RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93-101 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, A PROPERTY EXCHANGE AGREEMENT AND A LEASE BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE DONNA L. REEVES TRUST U.T.D. 7-25-90 ,~eenel/121413' 16 01/04/14 Ciw Council Minutes Deeember 14. 1993 19. Use of Redevelooment Bond Proceeds for Construction of City Administrative Offices and ~oroorate Yard City Attorney Field presented the joint staff report. Mayor Mufioz opened the public hearing 12:35 AM. Pat Keller, P.O. Box 521, Temecula, addressed the Council and Agency in opposition to the use of Redevelopment Funds for construction of a City Administrative Center. Steve Taplay, 43939 Margarita Road, spoke in opposition to the use of RDA funds for construction of a City Hall. He also stated he distributed a letter concerning rent the City pays for current facility and would like the figures corrected for the record. City Manager Dixon stated that the lease payment, plus tenant improvements is around $30,000/month. Howard Omdahl, 45850 Via Vaquero Road, addressed the Council and Agency stating the Bank of America location is not the proper location for City Hall, and stated the Crystal Ridge location, which he represents, would be a much better location for this facility. City Manager Dixon explained that what is before the Council and Agency is not acquisition or acceptance of a site, but merely financing in the event that this site is chosen for construction of a facility. Mayor Mur~oz closed the public hearing at 12:50 AM. Chairman Parks closed the RDA public hearing at 12:50 AM. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Pro Tam Robarts to approve staff recommendation with direction to amend Section 2 of the resolution to approve a contribution of $4,000,000.00. 19.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93-102 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE EXPENDITURE OF TAX INCREMENT FUNDS BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES AND A CORPORATION YARD NORTH OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND WEST OF DIAZ ROAD The motion was unanimously carried. Aeendl/121413 1l 01R)4/14 City Courtoil Minute Deoember 14. 1993 It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to extend the meeting until 1:20 AM. The motion was unanimously carried. COUNCIL BUSINESS 20. Flection of Mayor 21. Election of Mayor Pro Temoore 23. It was moved by Mayor Mu~ioz, seconded by Councilmember Parks to elect Councilmember Ron Roberrs to serve as Mayor to preside until the end of calendar year 1994, and Councilmember Jeff Stone to serve as Mayor Pro Tempore who will assume the duties of the Mayor in the Mayor's absence until the end of calendar year 1994. The motion was unanimously carried. Councilmember Birdsall briefly stepped down from the podium at 1:02 AM. Uraencv Ordinance to Allow Property Clearance for Fire Protection Purooses City Attorney Field presented the staff report. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to approve staff recommendation as follows: RECOMMENDATION: 23.1 Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 93-23 URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRUSH FOR FIRE PROTECTION AN TEMECULA PERMITTING CLEARING OF PURPOSES The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Councilmember Birdsall resumed her seat at 1:04 AM. Parks, Roberts, Stone, Muf~oz None Birdsall Aeemie(12141,1 11 Ol/Oul)14 CAW Coundl IVliewTe December 14. 1993 24. Consideration of Settlement Aoreement - McDowell vs. City of Temecula City Attorney Field presented the staff report and stated there is a typographical error in the recommendation and the amount should read ~1,607,422.15. Councilmember Stone voiced his opposition to the settlement, stating he feels the City will be expending more funds than this property is worth. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to approve staff recommendation as follows: 24.1 Consider approving the settlement agreement in the action entitled City of Temecul- v. McDowell in the amount of ~1,607.422.15. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts NOES: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz CITY MANAGER REPORT None given. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT None given. AlmliW121493 11 01/04/94 City Council Minute December 14. 1993 ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to adjourn at 1:13 AM to · meeting on January 11, 1994, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. J. Sal Mufioz, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk Aeene/121413 11 01/N,/N, ITEM NO. 3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLL~ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECITLA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the mount of $2,131,~10.02. Seaion 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADO~, this llth day of January, 1993. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] Reeoe 343 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 93- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 11th day of January, 1993 by the following roll call vote: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCH,MEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk CI'P( OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 2/09/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 12/16/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 12129/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN: $99,226.83 01/11/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN: $1,641,250.66 12/16/93 TOTAL PAYROLL: $108,951.82 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 01/11/94 COUNCIL MEETING: $2,131,510.02 DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL $668,883.31 100 GAS TAX ~86,442.13 190 TCSD $67,342.44 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A $10,948.73 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B $18,196.51 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C $26,006.33 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D $674,605.80 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) 1333,871.33 250 TCSD-CIP $182,654.55 ~ RDA-CIP Sl 3,870.00 SELF-INSURANCE ~3,836.64 310 VEHICLES $1,728.71 320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS $16,522.33 330 COPY CENTER $7,245.96 340 FACILITIES $803.43 $2,022,558.20 PAYROLL: 001 GENERAL (PAYROLL) ~8,9.524.09 100 GAS TAX (PAYROLL) $I 7,459.61 190 TCBD (PAYROLL) $16,5S9.84 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A (PAYROLL) $433.41 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C (PAYROLL) $1,715.25 300 SELF-INSURANCE (PAYROLL) ~59.82 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PAYROLL) $1,226.44 330 COPY CENTER (PAYROLL) S895.60 340 FACILITIES $777.76 $108,951.82 TOTAL BY FUND:  , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. ~E DIXON. CITY MANAGER $2.131,510.02 VOUCHRE2 12/09/93 15:46 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHEClC REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 6 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 COle4UN]TY SERVICES DISTRICT 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 280 REDEVELOPI4ENT AGENCY - CIP :300 INSURANCE FUND :310 VEHICLES FUND 320 INFORKATION SYSTENS 330 COPY CENTER FUND 340 FAC]LITIES TOTAL AHOUNT 6,157.14 1,641.67 4,537.66 900.97 12,400.00 270.00 559.93 4,876.7Z 1,461.41 274.88 33,080.38 VOUCHRE2 PAGE 2 12/P""'~ 15:46 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 1283O 12979 12979 12980 12980 12980 12~81 12~81 12f81 1L:~82 12982 12982 12982 1298 12/9B.~ 1; 1298/, 12985 12986 12987 12987 12987 12988 12988 12988 12988 12989 12989 12989 12990 129~0 12~1 12991 12~1 13r..--- CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE IlLleER MANE 12/02/93 12/09/93 1210~1rt3 · 1210919S 12/09/93 12/09/93 12/09/93 12/09/93 12/0~/93 12/09/93 12/09/93 12/09/93 12/0~/93 12/09/93 12/09/93 1Z/09/93 12/09/93 12/09/93 12/09/93 12/09/93 12/09/93 12/09/93 12/09/93 12/0~/93 1210~193 1210~193 12/0~/93 12109193 1210~1<~ 12109193 12109193 12/09/f3 12/09/93 12/09/93 12/09/93 12/0~/93 12/0~/93 001240 OLD TOil TEMECULA FERCH COX, MARY MARGARET 000100 ALLIED BARRICADE CONPAN 000100 ALLIED BARRICADE CONPAN 000101 APPLE ONE 000101 APPLE ONE 000101 APPLE ONE 000122 BSN SPORTS 000122 BSN SPORTS 000122 BSN SPORTS 000135 000135 000135 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES S]GN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SIR CENTRAL CITIES SIGN 000143 000143 000143 COPYLINE CORPORATION COPYLINE CORPORATION COPYLINE CORPORATION 000152 CALIFORNIA PARK & RECRE 000155 DAVLIN 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO 000166 000166 000166 TEMECULA FLOMER CORRAL TEMECULA FLOi~ER CORRAL TEMECULA FLOMER CORRAL 000177 000177 000177 000177 GLENNIE$ OFFICE PlffiDUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRCOUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000184 GTE 000184 GTE 000184 GTE 000186 HANKS HARDMARE 000186 HANKS HARDMARE 000192 000192 000192 0001~2 0001~2 GLOBAL COMPUTER $UPPLIE GLOBAL COMPUTER $UPPLIE GLOBAL COleqJTER SUPPLIE GLOBAL COMPUTER $UPPLIE GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIORS ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER AleXINT FUNDING FOR OLD TOHN Sl 280-199-999-5264 **COX, NARY/DOL 08/11/9 300-19~-~9-5207 LARGE BACK BRACES FOR TAX 100-1&~.-~-5218 100-164-99~-5218 TFJP.FOR FINANCE DEPT. TENP.FOR FINANCE DEPT. TEMP. ~BER 2.3, 1995 001-140-~-5118 001-140-9~9-5118 001-140-9~9-5118 8ZlXXXXX TABLE TENNIS H FREIGHT TAX 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 DOTS HINDING ROAD SIGNS ROAD SIONS TEHP NO PARKING SIGNS 100-164-~-5244 100-164-999-52z~ 100-164-~-52~ 100-164-~-5244 RICOH 5000 TONER FOR 55 FREIGHT TAX 330-199-999-5220 330-199-999-5220 330-199-999-5220 MEllERSH I P/PARKER 190-180-999-5226 VIDEO/AUDIO TAPES 001 - 100-999- 5250 PRELIMINARY TITLE REPOR 280-1790 FLOMERS/RUTH CHESHER FLOI4ERS/J. KIRCHGASSNER FLOMERS/SANDEE FLAINER 001-2170 001-2170 001-2170 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE $U MONTHLY ORGANIZER MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-110-999-5220 1~0-180-~-5220 001-140-~9~-5220 001-140J~9-5220 TCSD PHONE 909-695-3539 NOv 909-699-2309 NOV 320-199-~-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-~-5208 MISt SUPPLIES & EQUIPfiE 1~0-180-;-5212 MZSC. SMALL TOOLS & EQU ~0-199-~q~-5242 C220~ALQ200/300 RIBBON 320-199-;-5221 C2358 ALQ200/300 BLK RI 320-199-~q~-5221 C3589 HP LASERJET 4 TON 320-199-9~-5221 FREIGHT 320-19~-q~-5221 TAX 320-199-9~-5221 12,000.00 270.00 82.86 6.42 123.84 30.96 42.57 :~0.00 :~..00 26.35 134.69 221.30 202.03 53.87 5/~.00 5.~ 42.16 110.00 373.03 400.OO 45.52 45.26 45.52 41.~ 18.54 13.~ 2,247.27 25.45 21.41 121.60 30.18 140.28 38.28 265.98 9.38 3~.45 CHECK AMOUNT 12,000.00 270.00 89.28 197.37 4OO .35 611.89 592.08 110.OO 373.03 400.OO 136.30 108.62 2,294.13 151.78 ~88,37 VOUCliE2 12/09/93 15:~6 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUFIBER DATE NUI4BER 12f~2 1210~/g3 0001f3 12F73 12lOg/f3 000201 1299/, 12/09/9~ 000214. 12995 12/09/93 000224. 12996 12/09/93 000239 12997 12/09/93 00024.8 12997 12/09/93 00024.8 12998 12/09/93 000262 12999 12/09/93 000279 13000 12/09/93 000280 13000 12/09/93 000280 13001 12/09/93 000291 13001 12/09/93 000291 13001 12/09/93 000291 13002 12/09/93' 000305 13003 12/09/93 000306 13004. 12/09/93 000307 13004 12/0~;/93 000307 13004 12/09/93 000307 13005 12/09/93 000308 13006 12/09/93 000320 13007 12/0~;/z;3 000326 13007 12/09/93 000326 13007 12/09/93 000326 13008 12/0~;/93 000345 1300~; 12/09/93 000375 13010 12/09/93 000403 13011 12/09/93 000406 13012 12/09/93 0004,23 13012 12/09/93 000~23 CITY OF TEHECtJLA VOUCHER/CHECK REG]STER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR NAHE ICHA JENHACO LUNCH & STUFF CATERING FiELAD & ASSOCIATES OLSTEN TEFiPORARY SERVIC PETROLANE PETROLANE RAHCHO MATER SAYRE, RICK SC SIGNS SC SIGNS SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T TARGET STORE TEFiECULA VALLEY PIPE TEFIECULA TROPHY TEFiECULA TROPHY TEMECULA TROPHY TEMECULA T(NNE ASSOCIAT TOIJN CENTER STATIORERS UN]TOG RENTAL SERVICE UN]TOG RENTAL SERVICE UN]TOG RENTAL SERVICE XEROX CORPOeATION BILLI ITEM DESCRIPTIOR SET OF BOOKS REPORTS AN TEEN CENTER JANITORIAL PROJECT COMMITTEE LUNCH PLAN CHECKING FEE/NOV RECEPTIOR/B&S TEI4P FUEL FU~L RP CERTIFICATION REINB LUNCH WDEPUTY DA PLANNING SIGNS CITY COUNCIL SIGNS REPAIR & MAINT. CITY VE CORSICA LOF REPAIR & HA]NT. CITY VE RECREATION SUPPLIES SMALL TOOLS kEY CHAINS LOGO-ONE SIDE/INFOR ORE TAX NOV SET UP/DEC RENT OFFICE SUPPLIES 2 SETS OF UNIFORMS CLEA 2 SETS OF UNIFOR!4S CLEA STERLING & REED UNIFORFi FIETER USAGE; 5100 COPIE SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR 909-202-4.759 TE OCT SHNiN SCOTT POOL & SPA POOL SERVICE & MAZNTEHA RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF EXTRA DUTY PARK NANOR A H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU RECREATIONAL SUPPLIES H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU RECEEATIONAL SUPPLIES ACCOUNT liJllER 001-110-;-5228 1~0-181 -;-5212 1~0-180-;-5260 001 -, 162-999-524.8 001-162-999-511~; 190-180-999-5263 190-180-999-5263 100-164.-999-524.0 001-100-999-5260 001-161-999-5256 001-120-999-52/,/, 310-164.-999-5214. 310-162-999-5214. 310-164.-999-5214. 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5212 001-100-999-5265 001 - 100- 999- 5265 001 - 100-999-5265 001-1OO-999-52./,4. 190-180-999-5220 100-164-999-524.3 100-164-999-524.3 190-180-999-524.3 330-199-999-5259 001-162-999-5208 190-180-999-5212 001-170-999-5288 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 ITER 14.5.59 4.00.00 130.00 649.4.3 218.4.0 16.87 73.35 109.00 15.28 180,00 180.00 20.99 20.99 20.99 57.4.7 4.2.02 206.70 173.24. 29.45 615.00 87.55 5.25 17,77 16.10 62.15 843.4.0 10.70 27.50 PAGE 3 AMOUNT 165.59 4.00.00 130. O0 649.4.3 218.4.0 90.22 109.00 15.Z8 62'~ 57.4.7 4.2.02 4.09.39 615.00 87.55 39.10 62.15 8/,3.4.0 VOUCHRE2 CiTY OF TEHECULA 12/~""~ 15:&6 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 4 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VEIl)OR ITEM ACCOUNT NLNBER DATE NUMBER NH DESCRIPTION lIMBER ITEM AHOUNT CHECK NI)UNT 13013 12/09/93 000~27 ARTESIA INPLEHENT REPLACE SOLEHOED 310-180-999-5214 451 451.47 13014 12/09/93 000428 HORIZON MATER DEC COOLER/NOV MATER 190-182-999-52&0 36.85 36.85 13015 12/09/93 000/~2 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS ALARM MONITORING; CITY 3M)-199-999-5250 135.00 135.00 13016 12/09/93 000~78 FAST SIGNS SIGNS/HOLIDAY PARADE 190-183-999-537Q 131.89 131.89 13017 12/09/93 000558 ADVANCED 14081LECOMH MONTH SERVICE CIINffiE 320-1~-;-5209 236.25 236.25 13018 12/09/93 000580 PHOTO MORKS 13018 12/09/93 000580 PHOTO MORKS FILM, SLIDES/DEVELOM4EN 190-180-999-5301 CONVERT PICTURES INTO S 190-180-999-5250 72.68 71.12 143.80 13019 12/09/93 000587 HUNOZ, MARIO SENION CENTER JANITOR 1~0-181J~9-5250 140.00 140.00 13020 12/09/93 000603 CABLE & WIRELESS CONUN 10/16-11/15/93 XCA81143 320-199-9f9-5208 13021 12/09/93 000637 BLACK VOICE NEWS, THE LEGAL ADVERTISING 001-120-999-5256 1,566.79 122.53 1,566.79 122.53 13022 12/09/~3 0006~3 FORTNER HAIU)WARE NISC SLIPPLIES 190-180-;-5212 13022 12/09/93 000643 FORTNER HARDMARE NISC SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5212 1' 12/09/93 000645 SMART & FINAL PROGRAM SUPPLLIES 190-180-999-5301 247.60 14.39 80.04 261.~ 13024 12/09/93 000649 HIJNOZ, SAL J. REINB CiTY DESIGN gORKS 001-1OD-999-5258 54.52 54.52 13025 12/09/93 000668 TINNY D. PRODUCTiONS ENTERTAINHENT/HOLIDAY p 001-150-999-5265 350.00 350.00 13026 12/09/93 000680 ANS-TMS POSTAGE 001-100-999-5230 13026 12/09/93 000680 ANS-TNS POSTAGE 001-110-999-5230 13026 12/09/93 000680 AHS-TNS POSTAGE 001-140-999-5230 13026 12/09/93 000680 AHS-TMS POSTAGE 001-150-999-5230 13026 12/09/93 000680 ANS-TNS POSTAGE 001-120-999-5230 13026 12/09/93 000680 ANS-TMS POSTAGE 001-161-999-5230 13026 12/09/93 000680 ANS-TNS POSTAGE 001-162-999-5230 13026 12/09/93 000680 ANS-TNS POSTAGE 001-163-999-5230 13026 12/09/93 000680 ANS-TMS POSTAGE 190-180-999-5230 13027 12/09/93 000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 190-180-999-5263 13027 12/09/93 000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 100-16/,-999-5263 13027 12/09/93 00070~ SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 001-162-999-5263 10.99 238.24 302 69.71 200.11 209.77' 77.98 224.15 183.38 42.93 289 .)0 37.51 1,516.38 13028 12/09/93 000~4 A & R OUSTON SCREEN PR! 15 JACKETS/ROCKY COLA 190-183-999-5380 13028 12/09/93 000724 A & R OUSTON SCREEN PRI SATIN AMARD JACKETS 190-183-~-5380 13028 12/09/93 000724 A & R OUSTON SCREEN PRI XXL JACKETS 190-183-999-5380 13028 12/09/93 000724 A & R OUSTON SCREEN PRI TAX 190-183-999-5380 452.55 420.00 64.00 37.51 974.06 13029 12/09/93 000907 TEMEOULA CAR WASH OIL CHANGES/CAR MASHES 310-164-999-5214 13029 12/09/93 000907 TENEOULA CAR MASH OIL CHANGES/CAR MASHES 310-110-999-5214 13r" 12/09/93 000946 DISCOUNT FEED & TACK K-9 DOG FO00 001-170-999-5327 35.35 10.14 86.16 45.49 86.16 VOUCHRE2 12/09/93 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUNBER 13Q31 13032 1305"J 130~ 13035 13035 13035 13035 13036 13037 13037 13037 13037 13037 13037 13037 13037 13037 13037 13037 13038 13039 13039 13039 1304,0 13041 13042 13043 15:/,6 CHECK DATE 12109193 12/09/93 12/09/93 12109193 12/09/93 12/09/93 12/09/93 12/09/93 12/09/93 12109193 12109193 12109193 12109193 12109/93 12/09/93 12109193 12109193 12/09/93 12/09/93 12/09/93 12/09/93 12/09/93 12/09/93 12109193 12109193 12109193 12/09/93 12/09/93 VENDOR NNER 0009/,9 000980 00O993 001029 001056 001056 001036 001056 001076 001123 001123 001123 001123 001123 001123 001123 001123 001123 001123 001123 001209 001219 001219 001219 0012/.1 001242 001243 0012~/* GlOI RENTALS ~ST IRRIGATION SUPPLY FREEDCN COFFEE, INC, DATA QUICK EXCEL LANOSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE lIESTERN MASTE KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPL]E KNOX INDUSTRIAL $UPPL]E KNOX INDUSTRIAL $UPPLIE KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE KNOX INDUSTRIAL $1,1PPLIE KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPL]E KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE VAULT, THE TENECULA VALLEY LASER R TENECULA VALLEY LASER R TENECULA VALLEY LASER R REED, JIM NAT/ONAL TECHNICAL INFO PALNOUIST, HARY GREENBERG, KRISTZN CITY OF TB4ECIJLA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEN DESCRIPTION RENTAL OF GENERATOR/PAR glLKINS RING/DIAPHRAGN COFFEE SERVICE; CiTY HA DATA SERVICE NOV LANDSPMAINT PROVIDE I.ABOR AND MATER PROVIDE LABOR ~ MATER LABOR NOV 93 STD NO CHARGE BOLT, RIVETS, ALLEN HEA TAX GR5 CAP SCREW TAX GR5 CAPSCREW TAX CREDIT/INVOICED WR AMOU CREDIT/gRONGE DRDER 9/,7813 "Dn CELL BATTERI 94.781/* "C' CELL BATTER] TAX MICROFORM STORAGE BOXES OZONE FILTER SERVICE - CLEANING TAX REIN EXPENSES DURING PR 1987 CORPS lETLAND MANU CONTRACTED CLASS PAYMEN EXERCISE INSTRUCTOR PAY ACCOUNT NUNBER 1~0-183-FR-5370 W0-180-;-5212 ::~0-1~-;-5250 320-1~J~q-5250 193-180-999-5/.15 193-180-999-5/.15 193-180-999-5/.15 193-180-999-5/.15 190-180-999-5238 100-16/*-999-5218 100-16/*-999-5218 100-16/*-999-5218 100-164-999-5218 100-16/*-999-5218 100-16/*-999-5218 100-16/,-999-5218 100-164-999-5218 100-164-999-5/.02 100-164-999-5/.02 100-164-999-5402 001-120-999-5220 320-199-999-5215 320-199-999-5215 320-199-999-5215 190-180-999-5260 001-163-999-5228 190-183-999-5330 190-183-9~-5330 ITB 55.00 9.50 405.97 200.00 120.00 175.00 /*55.00 5~6.15 /*2.33 ~6.50 3.66 15.50 1.20 18/*.25- 50.10- /,8.00 43.20 7,07 29.00 5.00 195.00 .39 70.69 29.0O 1/.5.60 204.80 PAGE 5 leOtiNT 55.00 9.50 109.70 90.79 900.97 655.00 519.20 29.00 20O.39 70.69 29.0O 1/.5.60 204.80 TOTAL CHECKS VOUCHRE2 PAGE 7 12//""'~ 15:50 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERZOOS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 CONI4UN[TY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSO SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 19'5 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD 300 INSURANCE FUND 310 VEHICLES FUND 320 INFORI4ATIOR SYSTEME 330 COPY CENTER FUND 340 FACILITIES TOTAL aT 122,955.93 21,977.86 18,016.~ 9,508.4.0 18,196.51 2,396.75 /,5,695.87 9/2.55 755.12 1,458.0~ 328.55 269,000.33 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEHECULA 12/16/93 15:50 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE I VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTZOR 1IIBER 1304~ 12/15/93 001255 GEUBAUGH & SONS, INC. RELEASE OF JUDGENENT L[ 210-190-134-580~ 317623 12/16/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-20fi) 317623 12/16/93 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 100-2070 317623 12/16/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070 317623 12/16/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 191-20fi} 31762~ 12/16/93 O0O283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028~ FEDERAL 193-2070 317623 12/16/93 000?.83 FIRSTAX ([RS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070 317623 12116/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-20713 317623 12116193 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070 317623 12/16/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 3/,0-2070 317623 12/16193 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 HEDICARE 001-2070 317623 12116193 000283 FIRSTAX ([RS) 000283 HEDICARE 100-2070 317623 12/16/93 000283 FIRSTAX ([RS) 000283 MEDICARE 190-2070 317623 12/16/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MED]CARE 191-2070 317623 12/16/93 00O283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 193-2010 317623 12116193 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE 300-2070 317623 12/16/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICAlRE 320-2070 317623 12/16/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NED]CARE 330-2070 317623 12/16/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NED]CARE 3~0-2070 ITEM AHOUNT 10,000.00 12,7.15.7V 2,880.22 2,281.89 84.62 269.61 8~.25 267.11 76.58 3.37 2,548.55 630.73 571.60 16.09 19.78 65.02 22.86 23.30 C~ECK N:IaJNT 10,000.00 22,560.~6 396528 12/16/93 0002~4 FIRSTAX (EDD) O00A~ EDI 001-2070 396528 12/16/93 000~/:/: FIRSTAX (El)D) 000444 SO1 100-2070 396528 12/16/93. 000~4 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~4 SOl 190-2070 396528 12/16/93 000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 00044~ EDI 191-2070 396528 12/16/93 0004~ FIRSTAX (El)D) 0004~ SOl 193-2070 396528 12/16/93 0004~4 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004,~ SOl 300-2070 39/,528 12/16/93 000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004/~ SOl 330-2070 396528 12/16/93 000/~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~4 SOl 3/,0-2070 396528 12/16/93 O00~z, FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~4 STATE 001-2070 396528 12/16/93 00044/, FIRSTAX (EDD) O004J~ STATE 100-2070 396528 12/16/93 000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~4 STATE 190-2070 396528 12/16/93 000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 00064~ STATE 191-2070 396528 12/16/93 00044~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 0002~4 STATE 193-2070 394528 12/16/93 000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 000644 STATE 300-2070 396528 12/16/93 000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 000/,~ STATE 320-2070 396528 12/16/93 000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 00044~ STATE 330-2070 ~4~.58 120.01 160.16 7.22 26.93 3.05 10.25 10.~ 3,3/,1.88 700.73 489.56 21.66 69.91 25.55 56.65 13.~8 5,482.16 13068 12/16/93 HALETIN, DAN HALETIN/REIMB NOTARY SE 1~0-180-~-5226 10.00 10.00 130~9 12/16/93 000100 ALLIED BARRICADE CONPAN LIGHT BLUB FOR LIGHT TO 100-1(~-;-5218 21.55 21.55 13050 12/16/93 000125 CALED FINANCING ECONOHIC DEVE 001-160-~-5258 130.00 130.00 13051 12/16/93 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, PUBLIC OFFICIAL BOND 300'1f9-~-5200 500.00 500.00 13052 12/16/93 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS HAIL/SYSTEM SOURCE 001-160-;-5230 9.00 13053 12/16/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT MISt OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-161-;-5220 13053 12/16/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT PENS 001-161-;-5220 13053 12/16/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT NONATHLY TABBED CALENDA 001-161-999-5220 352.21 5.37 6.~ VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEHECIJLA 12/?''''~ 15:50 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOtJNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITF.~ AIK)UNT CHECK AII)UNT 13053 12/16/93 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISt, OFFICE SUPPLIES; 001-162-999-57.20 13053 12116193 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-1&0-999-5220 13053 12/16/93 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT HISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-160-999-5220 13053 12116193 OOO177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT NISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-160-999-5220 9.64 32.56 20.17 35.1)6 A59.03 13054 12/16/93 00018z, GTE 909-699-8632 NOV 93 320-1~-~9-5208 16.55 16.55 13055 12/16/f3 000186 HANKS HARDMARE MISC. SUPPLIES ' NUTS, 100-164-999-5262 52.50 52.50 13056 12/16/93 000193 ICMA GB-EFFECTIVE C00NtJNICAT 001-161-~-5228 32.65 32.65 13057 12/16/93 000196 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 000196 DEF COHP 001-2080 13057 12116193 000196 ICNA RETIREMENT TRUST 6 00019~ DEF Cl)NP 100-2080 13057 12116193 000196 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 6 00019/, DEF COMP 190-2080 13057 12116193 000194 ICNA RETIREMENT TRUST 6 000194 DEF CONP 191-2080 13057 12/16/93 000194 ICIIA RETIREMENT TRUST 6 000194 DEF CONP 193-2080 13057 12/16/93 000194 ICNA RETIREMENT TRUST 6 000194 DEF CCNP 300-2080 13057 12/16/93 000194 ICI4A RETIREMENT TRUST 6 000194 DEF CCNP 3/,0-2080 13058 12/16/93 000198 INTERNATIONAL _r'~I__NCIL 0 DUES THROUGH 1/95 001-110-999-5Z26 1,601.34 56~ .36 497.76 ~.08 61 25 50.00 250.00 2,813.56 250.00 l~/J)rd~ 12/16/93 000206 KINKO'S COPIES COPIES 001-110-~-5222 13b~ 12/16/93 000209 L & M FERTILIZER HEED EATER SUPPLIES 100-164-999-5218 63.53 63.53 3A .60 13061 12/16/93 000216 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING CITY CCXJtlCIL MEETING 001-100-999-5260 80.00 80.00 13062 12/16/93 000219 MARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO 13062 12/16/93 000219 HARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO PHOTO DEVELOPING AUTHOR 001-163-999-5250 PHOTO DEVELOPING AUTHOR 001-163-999-5250 82.50 105.12 187.62 13063 12/16/93 000239 OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC RECEPTION WE 11/28/93 001-162-999-5119 165.60 165.60 13064 12/16/93 000243 PAYLESS DRUG STORE FILM AND FILM PROCESSIN 001-162-999-5250 7.83 13065 12/16/93 0002A6 PERS EMPLOYEES, RETIREM 0002~6 PER REDE 001-2130 13065 12/16/93 0002~6 PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REM 000266 PER REDE 100-2130 13065 12/16/93 0002/,6 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000266 PERS RET 001-2390 13065 12/16/93 0002~6 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 0002/,6 PERS RET 100-2390 13065 12/16/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 190-2390 13065 12/16/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 191-2390 13065 12/16/93 000246 PER$ EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 193-2390 13065 12/16/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 300-2390 13065 12/16/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 320-2390 13065 12/16/93 000246 PERS EIIPLOYEES' RETIREIq 000246 PERS RET 330-2390 13065 12/16/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 PERS RET 3~0-2390 13065 12/16/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREH 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390 13065 12/16/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES, RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 100-2390 13065 12/16/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390 13065 12/16/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 191-2390 13065 12/16/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390 I:Y"" 12/16/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390 107.35 107.35 10,976.83 2,5T~.76 2,4,86.68 80.06 28/, .39 94.20 232.35 194.86 122.01 51.17 12.27 13.2~ .~2 1./~, .46 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA 12/16/93 15:50 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOB ALL PERIODS PAGE 3 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOB VENDOB ]TEN ACCOUNT NUNBER DATE NUIIER NANE DESCK]PTIOB NUNBER ITEN ANOUNT NeOUNT 13065 12/16193 0002/,6 PERS ENPLOYEES' RETIREN 0002/~ SUitVii 320-2390 13065 12/16/93 0002/,6 PERS EHPLOYEES' RETZREI, I 0002/,6 SURVIVOR 330-2390 13065 12/16/93 000266 PERS ENPLOYEES' RETIREM 0002/,6 SURVIVOR 360-3390 17,251.68 13066 12/16/93 0002/,8 PETROLANE FUEL 001-162-999-5263 1&&.37 1(~ .37 13067 12/16/99 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH RE]II 190-183-999-5320 13067 12/16/93 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH RE]II 190-180-999-5220 13067 12/16/93 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINB 1~0-181-~-5301 115.07 69.27 37.90 202.26 13068 12/16/99 000251 PLANNING CENTER, THE DEVELOPHENT CODE PROCES 001-161-99~-52~8 355.12 355.12 13069 12/16/93 000256 PRESS ENTERPRISE CUSTODIAN JOB ANMOUNCEN 001-150-999-525& 13070 12/16/99 000262 RANCHO WATER 10/11-11/09/93 MATER 190-181-999-5260 13070 12/16/99 000262 RANCHO HATER MATER 13070 12/16/99 000262 RANCHO MATER MATER 191-180-999-52~0 13070 12/16/99 000262 RANCHO HATER MATER 199-180-~-5240 13070 12/16/99 000262 RANCNO HATER CREDIT FIRE HETER CHG 190-180-99~-5240 13070 12/16/93 000262 RANCHO MATER MATER 199-180-999-5260 90.70 26.59 2,132.0~ 116.62 938.62 283.29- 7~6.10 3,674.68 13071 12/16199 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T REPAIR & NAINT. CITY VE 310-162-999-5216 13072 12/16/~3 000316 THOBNHILL, GARY LEAGUE OF CC/SAN FRAN 001-161-999-5258 20.99 62.00 13073 12/16/93 000320 TO~NE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5220 31.67 31.47 13074 12/16/93 000325 UNITED HAY OF THE INLAN 000325 Ug 001-2120 13074 12116/93 000325 UNITED HAY OF THE ]NLAN 000325 IN 190-2120 87.00 17.50 10~.50 13075 12/16/93 000326 UNZTOG RENTAL SERVICE 13075 12/16/~J 000326 UNZTOG RENTAL SERVICE 2 SETS OF UNIFORI4S CLEA 100-166-999-5243 FLOOR HAT SERVICES; CZT 3~0-199-999-5250 23.00 ~.50 57.50 13076 12/16/93 0003/,8 ZZGLER, GAZL HOLIDAY LIGHTS REFRESHN 190-183-999-5370 100.00 100.00 13077 12/16/93 000358 DIXON, DAVID F. FINANCIAL HANAGENENT/1)E 001-110-;-5258 13078 12116193 000376 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 00-00-700-9656-01 000-0 191-180-999-5260 13078 12116193 000376 SOUTHERN CALZF EDISON 00-00-700-~&56-01080-0 191-180-~-5319 13078 12/16/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 00-00-700-9656-01080-O 191-180-~-5260 352.38 3,237.55 158.16 3,748.0~ 1307~ 12/16193 000379 H. DEAN DAVZDSON RESTROOH/SNACKBAR DES[G 210-190-136-5802 3,960.00 13080 12/16193 000389 USCIq/PEBSCO, (ONRA) 000389 PT RETZR 001-2160 13080 12/16/93 000389 USCH/PEBSCO, (OBRA) 000389 PT RETZR 100-2160 13080 12/16/93 000389 USC34/PEBSCO, (C]E. RA) 0(0):38o PT RETIR 190-2160 62.66 191.58 136.38 39O.62 13081 12/16/93 000409 VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY SAFETY EIJIP & SUPPLIES 100-164-~-5242 13081 12/16/93 000609 VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY TAX 100-16A-999-5242 13081 12/16/99 000/,09 VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY SAFETY EQUIP & SUPPLIES 100-16~-999-5242 13081 12/16/93 000/,09 VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY TAX 100-166-999-5262 664.10 49.87 64.40 6.50 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA 12/Y"~ 15:50 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VEIQOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUISBER DATE NUMBER NN4E DESCRIPTION IIICBER ITEM ANGLINT ANQUNT 13082 12/16/93 000423 H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU PROGR~ SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5301 36.81 36.81 13083 12/16/93 000426 RANCHO iNDUSTRIAL SUPPL SENIOR CENTER SUPPLIES 190-181-~-5212 61.38 61.38 13084 12/16/93 000666 VISION CUNNIJNICJkTIOR SE 560250 26BUTTOR ADO OR 1308/, 12/16/93 0004J,6 VISION COIItlNICATION SE 700330 HANDSFREE UNIT 13084 12/16/93 000446 VISION CORI4UNICATIUN SE FREIGHT 13084 12/16/93 000/~6 VISION COI414UNICATION SE TAX 320-199-999-5242 320-199-999-5262 320-199-999-5262 320-199-999-5262 285. O0 126.00 9.00 31 .fi) 13085 12/16/93 000519 SOIJTH CIXJNTY PEST CONTR NOV 93 PEST CONTROL 3/,0-199-999-5250 13085 12/16/93 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR NOV PEST CONTROL/OLD BU 3~0-199-999-5250 62.00 42.00 84.00 13086 12/16/93 000525 PARKS, RONALD J. 13086 12/16/93 000525 PARKS, RONALD J. LCC HAYORS & COUNCIL CO 001-i00-999-5258 95TH ANNUAL COliF LCC 001-100-999-5238 49.81 71.80 121.61 13087 12/16/93 080537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 10/31-11/30/~3 13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDi 10/31-11/30/93 13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDZ 10/31-11/30/93 13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 10/31-11/30/93 13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDZ 11/01-11/30/93 13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFONNZA EDZ 10/31-11/30/93 I~/O~Z 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 10/31-11/30/93 1' 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDi 10/31-11/30/93 1~_, 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 10/31-11/30 13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 10/31-11/30 13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 10/31-11/30 13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED] 10/31-11/30 13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED! 11/31-11/30 13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED! 06/15-11/30/93 13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 10/31-11/30/93 13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED! 09/30-10/~1/93 13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED! 10/31-11/30/93 13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED! 10/31-11/30 13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 10/31-11/30 13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED] 10/31-11/30/93 13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 11/01-11,30 13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 10/31-11/30/93 13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDZ 10/31-11/30 13087 12/16/93 080537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 10/31-11/30 13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDZ 10/31-11/30 13088 12/16/93 000621 MESTERH RIVERSIDE COUNC 93 MEMBERSHIP DUES 13089 12/16/93 000722 SOUTHERN CAL. ASSOC. OF RENEW MEMBERSHIP 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-18Q-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 192-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 001-100-999-5226 081-162-999-5226 41.61 69.65 20.~ ~.~ 8.~ ~.37 ~.22 39.50 ~.57 45.51 63,57 18,196.51 133.19 117.71 33.02 63.~ 30.~ 30.~ 25.00 23,596.25 8,500.00 25.00 13090 12/16/93 000726 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI 19 HOOOED SIrcATS 190-183-999-5380 13090 12/16/93 000726 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRZ 16 JACKETS/DIAliNg) BOYS 190-183-99~-5380 ~89.80 521.51 911.31 13091 12/16/93 000765 AT & T * CELLULAR 619-987-1828-1 NJIq NOV 081-160-999-5208 13P 1z/16/93 000~56 lPS SERVICES, INC. SENIOR CENTER 210-199-801-58Q~ 3,6'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'38.50 VOUCHRE2 PAGE 5 12/16/93 15:50 ~ VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDDR VENDOIl NUMBER DATE NLJNBER NAME 13092 12/16/93 000756 IPS SERVICES, INC, 13093 12/16/93 000757 CONCZSE CONSTRUCTZON 13093 12116193 000757 CONCISE IDNSTRUCTION 13093 12/16/93 000757 CONCISE CONSTRUCT]ON 13093 12/16/93 000757 CONCISE CONSTRUCTION 13093 12/16/93 000757 CONCISE CONSTRUCTION 13093 12/16/93 000757 CONCISE CONSTRUCT]ON 13094 12/16/93 0007(~ DOS GRINGOS 13095 12/16/93 0007'91 CPSRPC CITY OF TBIECtJLA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOI)S ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NWIBER RETENTION 210-20~5 AIMlffi FON EXTRA M3RK 210-199-801-580~ BUILDING PORTION OF PRO 210-199-801-580A CONCISE CONSTRUCTION 210-1~-801-5806 ADJUSTlENT 210-1~-801-580~ RETENTION 210-2035 EXTRA WORK 210-1~-801-5804 SANTA BREAKFAST 1~0-183-~-5370 CPRS COliF FEB 3-6 1993 190-180-999-5258 13096 12/16/93 000822 DWIGHT FRENCH & A$SOCIA PARTIAL RETENTION 100-2035 130~7 12/16/93 000883 NONTELEONE EXCAVATING EXTRA WORK REQUIRED FOR 100-16~-999-5401 13097 12116193 000883 MC)NTELEORE EXCAVATING 288~1VALLEJO CONSTRUCT 100-16~-999-5401 13098 12/16/93 000~10 KOLL MANAGEMENT SERVICE DEC f3 RENT 1~0-182-~-5234 13099 12/16/93 000918 OAK-RIDGE INTERNATIONAL PAPER & DRILL PARTS 330-199-999-5242 13100 12/16/93 000937 C.M. ENGINEERING ENGINEERING SERVICE/MID 210-190-119-5802 13100 12/16/93 000937 C.M. ENGINEERING CR/FINAL REPORT NOT CON 210-190-119-5802 13101 12/16/93 0009/,7 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C MISC. BLUEPRINT REPROOU 001-163-999-5268 13102 12/16/93 0009/,9 GKN RENTALS TWO MONTHS SKIPLOADER R 100-16~-999-5238 13103 12/16/93 000963 HOGAN, DAVID APA STATE CONFERENCE 001-161-999-5258 13104 12/16/93 000~60 COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY 123(12 ORATE (53 190-180-~-5212 13105 12/16/93 000~2 RAI4ONA TZRE TIRE SERVICES FOR CZTY 310-1~-~-5214 13106 12/16/93 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5473(~03910032 NJM NO 001-140-~-5260 13106 12/16/93 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5~T'j(~03910057 NOV SN 190-180-~-5260 13106 12/16/93 001002 FIRST ZNTERSTATE BANK - 56~03910081 NOV RR 001-100-~-5260 13106 12/16/93 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 547'~5~03910149/TS 001-163-~-5260 13107 12/16/93 001013 HINDERLITER deLN~AS & A GALES TAX AOUZT AGREENE 001-140-~-5268 13108 12/16/93 0010~6 REXON, FREEDMAN, KLEPET 200513-00ON NOV 93 001-130-~-5247 13109 12/16/93 001054 CALBO ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING 001-162-999-5258 13110 12/16/93 001058 ACCURATE LANDSCAPE SP~TS PARK IRRIGATION 13111 12/16/93 001065 USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065 DEF IDIIP 13111 12/16/93 001065 USON/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065 DEF COMP 13111 12/16/93 001065 USCM/PEBSCO CDEF. CONP. 001065 DEF CONP 1~)-180-~-5212 001-2080 100-2080 1~0-2080 ITEM N~3UNT 4,525,00 129,Z47.:38 55,241.40- 3,001.6()- 89.98 854.50 1,030.00 3,615.61 3,042.00 12,600.00 3,376.95 116.59 475.00- 58.19 26.60 193.18 95.25 369.07 1.00 9.27 3Z3.60 76,98~.91 192.00 315.00 248.69 3,367.15 167.00 157.30 CHECK 3,276.65 27,015.00 854.50 1,030. O0 3,615.61 15,6/,2.00 3,374.93 116.59 411 .,..,. 58.19 26.40 193.18 95.25 3~.07 620.8~ 192.00 315 24,8.69 VOUCHRE2 PAGE 6 12/Y"" 15:50 CiTY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERICOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NtNBER DATE NIJMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NLI4BER 13111 12/16/93 001065 USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. Q01065 DEF COMP 3QQ-21380 13111 12/16/93 001065 USCN/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065 DEF CORP 320-2080 13112 12/16/93 001121 CREATIVE VIDEO PRCOUCTi FILMING OF CHRISTHAS PA 190-180-999-5301 13113 12/16/93 001173 KNOX INDUSTRIAL $IJPPLIE CAPSCREW 100-1t4-999-5218 13116 12/16/9~ 001152 M & P U!I)ERGROUND, iNC. RETENTIOR/CRC P~92-0898 250-2035 13115 12/16/93 001165 ENTERTAINMENT PUGLICATI INLAND EMPIRE ENTER. BU 190-183-999-5320 13116 12/16/93 001179 TREBOR COMPANY, THE 13116 12/16/93 001179 TREBOR COMPANY, THE 13117 12/16/9~ 001193 COMP LISA 13118 12/16/93 001196 MCKINLEY, STEW X-LARGE ~HIT VEST 100-1(~-99~-5218 TAX 100-16~-99~-5218 MISC COMRJTER StJPLIES 320-199-999-5221 ENTERTAINMENT FOR VOLUN 190-180-999-5301 13119 12/16/93 001212 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS 17-8276-036-1651-1 NOV 190-181-999-5260 13120 12/16/93 001232 COMMERCIAL FURNISHING, VINYL INSTALLED 210-199-801-5804 · 17 12/16/93 001267 CENTRAL MONITORING CORP MONITORING ALARIq SYSTEM 190-181-999-5250 13122 12/16/93' OO125O mLLZANS, DiCK CONST & INSTALL DESK AT 190-180-999-5601 13173 12/16/93 001251 LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO., CiTY OF TEMECULA CODE 001'162'999'5220 13123 12/16/93 001251 LONG BEACH URIFORN CO., TAX 001-162-999'5220 13126 12/16/93 001252 FAHEY, LINDA LEAGUE OF CA CITIES CON 001'161'999'5258 13125 12/16/93 001253 RAGAN COIIIJNICATIONS WORKING COIINNICATOR 001'161'999"5226 13126 12/16/93 001256 TENECtJLA STAMP & 6RAPHI HOLIDAY SIGHTS BUTTORS 190-183'999'5370 13127 12/16/93 001256 HARRIOTT RESERVATIORS/CPSRPC CON 19O'180'999'5258 13128 12/16/93 001257 ZAX ELECTRONIC PUBLICAT $UBSCR]PTION/CAL]F PEAC 001'170'999'5262 13129 12/16/93 001258 BETTER LOCAL 60VERNIqENT COIN]SS]ONERS TRAINING 19O'180'999'5258 13130 12/16/93 001259 DANIEL$, DONNA (TONA) DJ SEN]OR CHRiSTHAS DAN 19O-181'999'5301 13131 12/16/93 0012&0 C.P.R.S. PARK OPERATION C.P.R.S. CONFERENCE/BH 190'180'999'5258 13132 12/16/93 001261 KNOX COMPANY, THE EMERGENCY ENTRY/KNOX BU 190'181'999-5250 TOTAL CHECKS l TEN NI)UNT 3 312.50 125.00 20.93 972.55 108.80 29.50 2.29 97.63 75.00 8.68 1,035.00 114.46 835.00 60.00 4.65 352.33 97.00 173,86 588.73 177,79 18.00 200.00 60.00 148.00 CHECK AMOIJNT 3,987.42 125.00 20.93 972.55 108.80 31 97.43 73.00 8.68 1,035.00 114.66 835.00 6~ .65 352.33 97.00 173,86 588.73 177.79 18.00 200.00 148.00 269,000.33 VOUCHRE2 PAGE 8 12/2~/93 12:18 ~ CITY OF TE!qECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 CONI4UMZTY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL INPROVENENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 310 VEHICLES FUND 320 INFORNATION SYSTENS 330 COPY CENTER FUND TOTAL ANOUNT 20,238.9z, 7,189.20 13,080.82 965.33 1,84,1.62 69,899.8~ 100.00 1 ,~,7.33 3,533.~7 ~,226.83 VOUCHRE2 PAGE 1 12//""~t 12:18 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 13137 13138 13139 13140 13141 13142 13143 13144 13144 131~ 13144 13145 13145 13-u~ 13,.o 13146 13146 13147 13148 13148 13149 13149 13149 13150 13150 13150 13150 13151 13151 13151 13151 13151 13151 13151 13151 CHECK DATE 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12129/93 12/29/93 12129/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 VENDOR NI. IqBER 000100 000102 000120 000127 000127 000127 000127 000135 000135 000135 000137 000137 000137 000144 000155 000155 000156 000156 000156 000165 000165 000165 000165 000170 000170 000170 000170 000170 000170 000170 000170 000175 NAME GARRIS], MARIA RICE FIRE PROTECTION A!~ST DEVELOMqENT, INC THE TOIIAN COMPANY ALLIED BARRICADE CONPAN AMERICAN FENCE COMPANY BICKNELL TRAVEL CENTER CALl FONNIAN - LEGAL CALl FONNIAN - LEGAL CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL CALl FORNIAN - LEGAL CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. CHEVRON U,S,A. INC. CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. COSTCO WHOLESALE DAVLIN DAVLIN DENT]CARE OF CALIFONN[A DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA FEDERAL EXPRESS FEDERAL EXPRESS FEDERAL EXPRESS FEDERAL EXPRESS FRANKLIN QUEST CCIe:~ANY FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY GFOA CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ZTEN DESCRIPTION REINB FOR NOTARY SERV RICE FIRE PROTECT[ON/RE AI~ST/REFUND FEES TONAN COMPANY/REFUND GR LIGHT BULB FOR LXGHT TO TEMPORARY FENCE RENTAL TOUR PROJECTS SANTA CRU OPEN P.O. PUBLIC NOTICE OPEN P.O. PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN SIGNS, POST AND RELATED SIGNS, POST AND RELATED SIGNS, POST AND RELATED 709-819-697-2 NOV. FUEL 789-819-697-Z NOV. FUEL 789-819-697-2 NOV. FUEL 5 POLAROID CAMERAS AUDIO TAPE; PLANNING VIDEO/AUDIO TAPE INSURANCE PREMIUN/JANUA INSURANCE PREMXUM/JANUA INSURANCE PREMION/JANUA MAlL/PLANNING POSTAGE/FINANCE POSTAGE/BUILD & SAFETY POSTAGE BUILD & SAFETY COMPACT STORAGE BINDER CLASSIC STORAGE BINDERS NONARCH STORAGE BINDER SOFT BRIEF CASE FREIGHT TAX CLASSIC STORAGE BINDERS TAX GFGA AWARD APPLICATION ACCOUNT NUMBER 190'180'999'5250 001-171-4036 001-2650 001-163-4372 100-164-999-5218 190-180-999-5238 210-190-137-5802 001-120-999-5256 001-120-999-5256 001-161-999-5256 001-161-999-5256 100-164-999-5244 100-164-999-52z~ 100-164-999-52/~. 001-161-999-5262 001-170-999-5262 001-110-999-5263 001-170-999-5242 001-161-999-5250 001-100-999-5250 001-2.'7~0 100-2.~0 001-150-999-5250 001-161-999-52~0 001-140-999-5230 001-162-999-5230 001-162-999-5230 001-161-999-5220 001-161-999-5220 001-161-999-5220 001-161-999-5220 001-161-999-5220 001-161-999-5220 001-161-999-5220 001-161-999-5220 001-140-999-5250 i TEN AMOUNT 5.00 261.00 9,103.00 700. O0 134.69 145.00 1,384.00 178.74 118.86 149.46 51.88 102.36 228.59 103.~ 10.96 20,75 65.91 150.80 150.00 707.11 29.86 14.95 15.00 13.50 22,00 13.50 15.25 4.95 6.95 11.95 39.95 6.95 5.48 62.55 4.85 415.00 CHECK AROrJNT 5.00 261. O0 9,103.00 7O0.00 134.69 145.00 1,384.00 498.94 434.39 97.62 150,80 857.11 59.79 64.25 143.63 415.00 VOUCHRE2 12129193 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 13153 13153 13153 13153 13153 13154 13154 13155 13156 13157 13157 13157 13'157 13158 13158 13158 13158 13158 13158 13158 13158 13158 13158 13158 13158 13158 13159 13159 13160 13161 13161 13162 13162 13163 13164 13164 13164 13164 13164 13164 12:18 CHECK DATE 12/29/93 12/29193 lZ/29/93 lZ/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 lZ/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 1Z/Z9/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 lZ/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12129193 12129/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 lZ/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 VENDOR NLllER 000177 000177 000177 000177 000177 00018~ 000184 000205 000206 000228 000228 000228 000228 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000254 000254 000255 000262 000262 000280 000280 000291 000294 000294 000294 0002~4 000294 O002W~ VENDOR NAME GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GTE GTE KIDS PARTIES, ETC, KINKO~S COPIES MOBIL MOBIL MOBIL MOBIL PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PRESS ENTERPRISE PRESS ENTERPRISE PRO LOCK & KEY RANCHO WATER RANCHO WATER SC SIGNS SC SIGNS SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T STATE COMPENSATIOR INS. STATE COMPENSATION INS. STATE COMPENSATION INS. STATE COMPENSATION ]NS. STATE COMPENSATION INS. STATE COMPENSATION INS. CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER MISC, OFFICE SUPPLIES MISC, OFFICE SUPPLIES MISC, OFFICE SUPPLIES MISC, OFFICE SUPPLIES MISC, OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5220 001-140-~-5220 001-140-~-5220 001-140-~9~-5220 001-140-~-5220 909-695-3564 320-1~9-~9~-5208 100-164-~-5208 ENTERTAINMENT BRKFST W/190-18~-999-5320 CARD STOCK GENERAL PLAN 001-161-99~-5222 883 930 379 6 OCT 88~ 930 379 6 OCT 883 930 379 6 OCT 883 930 379 6 OCT 001-161-99~-5262 001-110-~9~-5263 320-1~-~-5262 001-162-99~-5263 PETTY CASH/CITY PETTY CASH/CITY PETTY CASH/CITY PETTY CASH/CITY PETTY CASH/CITY PETTY CASH/CITY PETTY CASH/CITY PETTY CASH/CITY PETTY CASH/CITY PETTY CASH/CITY PETTY CASH/CITY PETTY CASH/CITY PETTY CASH/CITY 100-164-~-5218 001-140-~9~-5260 001-150-~-5260 001-150-~9-5260 001-161-~-5262 001-161-~-5220 001-161-9q~-5250 001-161-~-5260 001-162-999-5260 001-163-~99-5250 001-100-9~-5220 001-100-~99-5258 001-100-999-5260 OPEN Po FOR ADVERTISING 001-161-999-5256 SUBSCRIPTION 12/16-2/15 190-180-999-5226 DUPLICATE KEY 190-180-999-5212 NOV WATER SERVICE NOV WATER SERVICE 1~-180-999-5240 190-180-~-5240 SIGNS 001-120-~-52~, OPEN PO FOR S & C SIONS 001-161-~-5256 REPAIR & NAINT, CITY VE 310-162-~-5214 ANNUAL DEPOSIT & SURCHA ANNUAL DEPOSIT & SURCHA CREDIT NISCLASSIFICATIO CREDIT NISCLASSIFICATIO CREDIT MISCLASSIFICATIO CREDIT MISCLASSIFICAT]O 001-150-~-5250 001-1640 001-110-~-5112 001-120-~-5112 001-140-~-5112 001-150-999-5112 ITEM AMOUNT 8,62 19,29 139,81 59,35 18.59 35.25 36.66 150.00 14,98 14.58 36.99 16.39 26.69 28.06 15.50 ~.03 6.00 21.28 14.37 4.77 46.08 14.37 7.47 25.00 15.00 133,Z0 14.55 3,23 Z,626,64 268.35 135.00 135,00 423.44 8,859.00 7,571.40' 2,5&0.76' 6,245.71 - 1,818.88- PAGE 2 CNE.CK ~ROIJNT 245.66 71.91 150.00 14,98 94,65 266.92 147.75 3.23 2,894,99 270.00 VOUCHRE2 CiTY OF TENECULA 12/7''~ 12:18 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRiPT]ON NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AROUNT 13164 12/29/93 00029A STATE COMPENSATION INS. CREDIT M]SCLASSIFICATiO 193-180-999-5112 13164 12/29/93 000294 'STATE COMPENSATION iNS. CREDIT MISCLASSIFICATiO 300-199-999-5112 13164 12/29/93 000294 STATE COMPENSATIOR INS, CREDIT MISCLASSIFICATIO 320-199-999-5112 13164 12/29/93 000294 STATE CONPENSATIOR INS. gORKERS COMP/DEC 93 001-2.:370 13164 12/29/93 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS. WORKERS COMP/DEC 93 100-2370 13164 lZ/29/93 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS, WORKERS CORP/DEC 93 190-2370 13164 12/29/93 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS, MORKERS CORP/DEC 93 191-2370 13164 12/29/93 000294 STATE COMPENSATION iNS, MORKERS COMP/DEC 93 193-2370 13164 12/29/93 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS, WORICERS CORP/DEC 93 300-2370 13164 12/29/93 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS, WORKERS COMP/DEC 93 320-2370 13164 12/29/93 00029~ STATE COMPENSATION iNS, WORKERS CORP/DEC 93 330-2370 13164 12/29/93 000294 STATE CONPENSAT[OR INS. WORKERS COMP/DEC 93 001-1182 13164 12/29/93 000294 STATE CORPENSATIOR INS. WORKERS CORP/DEC 93 001-161-999-5112 1,257.1~- 453.61- 1,598.73- 9,057.89 4,465.66 2,938.55 201.21 422,~5 66.90 220.52 314.34 151.6,$ 4.03 5,619.89 131'65 12/29/93 000305 TARGET STORE RECREAT[OR SUPPLIES lg0-180-~-5301 29.25 29.25 131&& 12/29/93 000307 TENECULA TROPHY TROPHIES 190-182-999-5301 25.8& 25.8& 13167 12/29/93 000320 TiE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-180-{~-5220 13167 12/29/93 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-180-~-5220 13167 12/29/93 000320 TO~NE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-1&1-~-5220 13/lX-7 12/29/93 000320 TiE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-163-99~-5220 f 12/29/93 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-163-999-5220 39,62 9.72 61.12 9.20 36.51 156.17 13168 12/29/93 000322 UNIGLOBE BUTTERFIELD TR AIRFARE/OAKLAND JAN 13- 001-100-999-5258 13168 12/29/93 000322 UNIGLOBE BUTTERFIELD TR AIRFARE/SACRAMENTO JAN 001-100-999-5258 144.00 150.00 294.00 13169 12/29/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORM SET UP 190-180-999-5243 13169 12/29/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORM RENTAL 190-180-999-5243 13169 12/29/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 2 SETS OF UNIFORNS CLEA 100-164-999-5243 13169 12/29/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 2 SETS OF UNIFORMS CLEA 100-164-999-5243 13169 12/29/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORH RENTAL 190-180-999-5243 13169 12/29/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE CREOIT 190-180-999-5243 13169 12/29/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE CREDIT/NOT WEARABLE 190-180-999-5243 13169 12/29/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORM RENTAL 190-180-999-5243 13169 12/29/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORM RENTAL 190-180-999-5243 132.69 5.33- 23.00 23.00 16.10 2.50- 2.50- 16.10 16.10 216.66 13170 12/29/93 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI LEASE AGREEMENT/JAN 5"30-199-999-5219 2,969.95 2,969.95 13171 12129/93 000352 RIVERSIDE COUNTY ASSESS NAP COPIES 190-180-999-5224 30.50 30.50 13172 12/29/93 000364 GREEK, JUNE S. ELECTIOR LAW 12/07-12/1 001-120-999-5261 52.00 52.00 13173 12/29/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 08/12/93-12/02/93 191-180-999-5319 13173 12/29/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 11/02/93-12/0~/93 191-180-999-5319 13173 12/29/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 11/02/93-12/0~/93 191-180-999-5319 13173 12/29/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 11/17/93-12/03/93 190-180-999-5240 13173 12/29/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF BISON 11/05/93-12/08/93 191-180-999-5319 13173 12/29/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 11/05/93-12/08/93 191-180-999-5319 13173 12/29/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON 10/23/93-11/19/93 190-181-999-5240 163.00 37.11 150.15 28.47 245.86 952.53 1,643.46 VOUCHRE2 PAGE lZ/~9/93 12:18 ~ VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 13174 13174 13174 13174 13174 13174 13174 13174 13174 13174 13174 13174 13174 13174 13174 13175 13176 13177 13178 13179 13179 13180 13180 13180 13181 13182 13183 13183 13183 13183 13183 13183 13183 13183 13183 13184 13185 13186 CHECK DATE 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 lZ/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 lZ/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 lZ/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 VENDOR NUMBER 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 000388 0013/,00 000402 000408 000409 000409 000423 000423 000423 000~26 000427 000431 000/,31 000431 000431 000431 000431 000431 000431 000431 000471 000519 000525 VENDOR NANE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL .SOUTHERN CALl FORNIA TEL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL SOUTHERN CAL/FORNIA TEL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL SOUTHERN CAL]FORN]A TEL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL SOUTHERN CAL/FORN]A TEL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL SOUTHERN'CALIFORNIA TEL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL SOUTHERN CALIFORN]A TEL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL ICBO ALEXANDER HAMILTON INST BERG, PARK AGRICREDIT ACCEPTANCE C VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL ARTESIA IMPLEMENT NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH NATIORAL DENTAL HEALTH NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH IGOE & COMPANY SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR PARKS, RONALD J. CITY OF TENEOULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERKCOS ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUNBER 909-202-4751TS 909-202-4752 $N 909-202-4753/BH 909-202-4754/KH 909-202-4755/SN 909-202-4756/TH 909-202-4757/JG ~-202-4758/RR 90~-202-4759/TE 909-202-4762/HE 909-202-4763/PB 909-202-4764 BB 909-202-4765 BB ~09-202-4767/GT 909-202-4769/JS 100-164-~9-5208 190-180-~99-5208 lf0-180-999-5208 1~0-180-~-5208 190-180-999-5208 320-1~-~q9-5208 001-120-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-162-~-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-100-~-5208 100-164-q9~-5208 100-164-999-5208 001-161-~99-5208 001-100-999-5208 '92-g3 TITLE 24 UPDATE 001-162-999-5226 PUBLICATION/HUMAN RESOU 001-150-~-5228 REINB\CERTIFICATIOR PAX 001-162-999-5261 JANUARY .LEASE 190-180-999-5239 SAFETY EQUIP & SUPPLIES 100-164-~-5242 TAX 100-164-999-5242 RECREATIONAL SUPPLIES RECREATIONAL SUPPLIES RECREATIONAL SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-182-999-5301 SUPPLIES 190-181-~-5212 REPAIRS 310-180-999-5214 INSURANCE PREMIUM/JANUA O01-Z.v~O INSURANCE' PREMIUM/JANUA 100-2340 INSURANCE PREMIUM/JANUA INSURANCE PREM]UM/JANUA 191-2340 INSURANCE PREMIUM/JANUA 195-2340 INSURANCE PREMIUM/JANUA 300-2340 INSURANCE PREMIUM/JANUA 330-Z.',',v~0 INSURANCE PREMIUM/JANUA 001-1180 INSURANCE PREMIUM/JANUA 081-150-999-5250 FLEX PLAN AOMIN FEE/NOV 001-150-~99-5250 PEST CONTROL/NOV. 1~0-181-~9-5250 TRAMCON 2000 10/25-10/2 001-100-999-5258 ITEM AMOUNT 74.12 141.18 37.85 49.28 38.43 35.04 37.74 57.90 51.57 80.19 46.40 55.61 59.78 172.92 5.00 45.00 846.02 503.35 38.48 27.84 21.09 38.56 28.93 164.48 621.58 170.61 130.00 7.31 8.94 4.06 32.50 48.75 15.00 29.00 34.79 · CHECK NqOUNT 875.65 172.92 5.00 45.00 541.83 87.49 28.93 164.48 1,038.75 268.76 29. O0 ----~. VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA 12/2"'~'~ 12:18 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER[COS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAHE DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEN ANOUNT CHECK /INOIJNT 13187 12/29/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 10/~1-11/30 13187 lZ/29/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 10/31/93-11/30/93 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 40.43 42.45 82.88 13188 12/29/93 000587 MUNOZ, IqARIO JANITORIAL 12/6-12/17 190-181-999-5250 210.00 210.00 13189 12/29/93 000603 CABLE & WIRELESS CONNUN NOV 16- DEC 15 320-199-999-5208 1,633.08 1,633.08 13190 12/29/93 000611 TEXACO REFINING & HARKE FEDERAL GAS TAX 001-110-999-526~ 36.33 36.33 13191 12/29/93 000677 RANCHO SIGN & SCREENPRI BANNER HOLIDAY HONE TOU 190-180-999-5301 360.96 360,96 13192 12/29/93 000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 001-110-999-5263 13192 1Z/Z9/93 000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 001-162-999-526~ 13192 12/29/93 000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 100-164-999-526~ 13192 1Z/29/9~ 000704 SKS, INC,/INLAND OIL FUEL 190-180-999-5263 19.51 62.16 407.38 65.76 554.81 13193 12/29/93 000724 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI T-SHIRTS, TANK TOPS,~I~E 190-11G-~-5380 13193 12/29/93 000724 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRZ T-SHIRTS,TANK TOPS,SMEA 190-183-999-5380 484.88 37~. 97 864.85 13194 12/29/93 000727 NFPA FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIA 001-171-f99-5226 95.00 95.00 1~ 12/29/93 000756 Ips SERVICES, INC. RETENTION 210-2035 34,004.83 13,.o 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PRENION FOR JANUARY 001-2360 13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AHERICA PREMION FOR JANUARY 100-2360 13196 lZ/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREM]ON FOR JANUARY 190-Z360 13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PRIMION FOR JANUARY 191-2360 13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AHERICA PREMION FOR JANUARY 19~-2~60 13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMION FOR JANUARY 300-Z360 13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AHER]CA PREMIUM FOR JANUARY 320-2~60 13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREM]ON FOR JANUARY 330-Z]60 13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREM]ON FOR JANUARY 001-2380 13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AERICA PREMIUM FOR JANUARY 100-2380 13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUH FOR JANUARY 190-2380 13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PRIMION FOR JANUARY 191-2380 13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMION FOR JANUARY 193-2380 13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMION FOR JANUARY 300-Z380 13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR JANUARY 320-2380 13196 12/29/93 000765 .GROUP AMERICA PREM]ON FOR JANUARY 330-Z~80 13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR JANUARY 001-2500 13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AHERICA PREMIUM FOR JANUARY 100-2500 13196 1Z/Zg/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMItJN FOR JANUARY 190-2500 13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMION FOR JANUARY 191-2500 13196 1Z/Zg/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMION FOR JANUARY 193-2500 13196 12/Z9/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR JANUARY 300-2500 13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMION FOR JANUARY 320-2500 13196 1Z/Z9/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMION FOR JANUARY 330-2500 13197 12/29/93 000770 UCR EXTENSION M:)RKSHOP/PHILLIS RUSE 190-180-999-5258 1T"' 12/29/93 O001B9 CELSOC SEMINAR 1/31/94 & 02/01 001-163-999-5261 570.00 128.25 133. O0 4.28 14.72 4.75 9.50 19.00 932.78 226.77 194.67 5.89 20.91 7.76 18.67 18.59 202.01 49.45 42.82 1.30 4.60 1.71 4.11 4,09 36.50 710.00 34,004.U 2,619.63 36.50 710,00 VOUCHRE2 PAGE 6 12/29/93 12:18 /'~ VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 13199 13200 CHECK DATE 12/29/93 12/29/93 VENDOR NUMBER 0008~ 000905 VENDOR NAIqE CITY OF TEHECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION PRESENTATION PROOUCTS 6PK TAPE TEMECULA SHUTTLE SERVIC RANCHO SPRTS PRK PROJ C 13201 12/29/93 000949 GKN RENTALS GENERATOR 13202 13203 13203 13203 13204 13205 13206 13207 13207 13207 13207 13207 12129193 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/9] 12129193 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/9] 13208 13208 13208 13209 13210 000950 000992 000992 000992 001006 001022 001028 001085 001085 001085 001085 001085 001122 001122 001122 001130 001153 001160 001189 001189 001189 CALIFORNIAN - DISPLAY JOB ANNOUNCEMENTS RAHONA TIRE RAffi)NA TIRE RAHONA TIRE REPAIRS TIRE SERVICES CITY VEHI CREDIT ROAD HAZARD WARR 13211 13212 13212 13212 13213 13213 13213 13213 13213 13213 13Z13 13213 13213 13214 13215 BURTRORICS BUSINESS SYS PAPER SUPPLIES THOHPSON PUBLISHING GRO REFERENCE BOOKS MEYER, CHUCK INSTALLAT]ON OF RHETORE L.N. CURTIS & SONS L.N. CURTIS & SONS L.N. CURTIS & SONS L.N. CURTIS & SONS L.N. CURTIS & SONS PILOT GAUGE (PIEZONETER LINE GAUGE, '2.5" SIZE, CAP GAUGE, 2.5" SIZE, S FREIGHT TAX SCOTCH PAINT CORPORAT]O 5 GALLON RECYCLE PAINT SCOTCH PAINT CORPORATiO PAINT SCOTCH PAINT CORPORAT]O PAINT MK BATTERY BATTERIES FOR CITY VEHI FIRE PROTECTION PUBLICA 35268; BUILDING CONST. PACTEL CELLULAR-LA 6015202120193/TH NURRIETA DEVELOPMENT CO "EMERGENCY' REPAIR TO S MURRIETA DEVELOPMENT CO SENIOR CENTER SE~ER LAT NURRIETA DEVELOPMENT CO EMERGENCY REPAIR ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-161-999-5220 210-190-137-5802 190-180-999-52]8 001-150-999-5254 310-162-999-5214 310-162-999-5214 310-162-999-5214 001-163-999-5220 190-180-999-5228 320-1950 001-171-999-5242 001-171-999-5242 001-171-999-5242 001-171-999-5242 001-171-999-5242 100-164-999-5218 100-164-999-5218 100-164-999-5218 310-164-999-5214 001-171-999-5228 320-199-999-5208 190-180-999-5212 210-199-801-5804 210-199-801-5804 00119] CONP USA 875484 MEDi SEKURIT LOC 320-199-999-5242 00119] CONP USA FREIGHT 320-199-999-5242 001193 CONP USA TAX 320-199-999-5242 001193 CONP USA 227673 CD CADDY 320-199-999-5221 001193 CONP USA 849960 gRIST PAD 320-199-999-5221 001193 CONP USA FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221 001193 COMP USA TAX 320-199-999-5221 001193 CONP USA 8]7492 TEAC 1./d, FLOPPY 320-199-999-5215 001193 CONP USA TAX 320-199-999-5215 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS 11/30-12/16 001212 001219 TEMECULA VALLEY LASER R AC HIGH VOLTAGE UNIT 190-180-999-5240 320-199-999-5215 ITEM AMOUNT 177.15 100.00 55.00 14.72 336,65 315.55 112.86- 97,62 157.23 800.00 263.75 157.40 117.60 7.22 41 35.93 85.12 147.56 53.91 15.00 58.65 4,554.00 8,411.00 6,000.00 147.42 4.00 10.69 54.4~, 24.43 4.00 5.71 149.16 10.81 200.00 C. ECK 177.15 100.00 55.00 14.72 539.34 97.6Z - 157.23 800.00 58; 268.61 53.91 15.00 58.65 18,965.00 410.66 11.84 VOLICHRE2 12/7''''~ VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 13215 13215 13215 13215 13216 13216 13216 13216 13216 13216 13216 13217 13218 13219 13220 132~z 13223 13224 13225 12:18 CHECK DATE 12/29/93 12129193 12/29/93 12/29/93 12129193 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 12/29/93 VENDOR NUMBER 001219 001219 001219 001219 001222 001222 001222 001222 001222 001222 001222 001247 001262 001263 001264 001265 001266 001267 001268 001269 CITY OF TENEOULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NAHE DESCRIPTION NUMBER TEMECULA VALLEY LASER R LABOR PERFORMED TEMEOULA VALLEY LASER R TAX TEHECULA VALLEY LASER R OZONE FILTER TEMECULA VALLEY LASER R TAX 320-199-999-5215 320-199-999-5215 320-199-999-5215 320-199-999-5215 ALPHA COlet~ICATIONS ALPHA COMMUNICATIONS ALPHA COIeeJNICATIONS ALPHA COMMUNICATIONS ALPHA COMHUNICATIONS ALPHA COIIeJNICATIONS ALPHA COMMUNICATIONS RENTAL CREDIT DEC PAGER RENTAL DEC PAGER RENTAL DEC PAGER RENTAL DEC PAGER RENTAL DEC PAGER RENTAL DEC PAGER RENTAL 190-180-999-5238 190-180-999-5218 001-162-999-5238 320-199-999-5238 100-164-999-5238 001-170-999-5242 001-140-999-5250 CENTRAL NONITONING CORP NONITON SENIOR CENTER 190-181-999-5250 LAYLANDER, CHUCK RODF[MG EVALUATION FOR 280-1700 HARVEY, SCOTT TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 001-150-~99-5259 PRICE COSTCO RENEWAL OF MEMBERSHIP 001-140-9~-5226 INTEGRATED DESIGN PRODU MAINTENANCE SPIRAL NACH 330-1~9-~-5242 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC AICP STUDY GUIDES 001-161-999-5261 DMV RENEWAL REGISTRATION CITY HANAG 001-110-999-5Z26 PRINCETON ARCHITECTURAL THE NEXT AHERICAN METRO 001-161-99~-5228 LIEBERT, CASSIDY & FRIE SPECIAL SERVICES 001-150-999-5248 ITEN ANOUNT 60.00 15.50 35.00 2.69 11.00- 99.00 33.00 11.00 62.3~ 18.33 7.33 106.72 100.00 400.00 48.49 175.00 25.00 321.00 28.45 156.00 PAGE 7 CHECK · AMOUNT 313.19 220.00 106.72 100.00 400.00 48.49 175.00 25.00 321. O0 28.45 156.00 TOTAL CHECKS 99,226.83 VOUCHRE2 PAGE 12/29/93 13:01 ~ CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 COII4UNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D ZlO CAPITAL INPROVENENT PROJ FUND 250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD 280 REDEVELOPHENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTENS 330 COPY CENTER FUND TOTAL ANOUNT 419,531.30 59,633.40 21,701.32 475.00 20,864..~ 674,605.80 ?..38,275.63 191,682.00 1,170.00 8,220.24 1,~05.03 1,&41,Z50.&& VOUCHRE2 12/7''~ 13:01 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUNBER DATE NUffiiER NANE ITEH ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUNBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK tJ~OUNT 13229 01/11/94 000107 ALHAMBRA GROUP 13229 01/11/94 000107' ALHNIRA GROUP CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 100-164-999-5248 LONA LINDA PARK IMPROVE 210-190-134-5802 90.00 4,220.00 4,310.00 13230 01/11/94 000123 13230 01/11/94 000123 13230 01/11/94 000123 13230 01/11/94 000123 13230 01/11/94 000123 13230 01/11/94 000123 13230 01/11/94 000123 BURKE WILLJAMS & SORENS BURKE WZLLIANS & SOltENS BURKE WZLL/AMS & SORENS BURKE WILLIAHS & SO!tENS BURKE WILLIANS & SO!tENS BURKE WZLLZAMS & SORENS BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS LEGAL SERVICES/OCT. 93 LEGAL SERVICES/NOV. LEGAL SERVICES/NOV. LEGAL SERVICES/NOV, LEGAL SERVICES/NOV. LEGAL SERVICES/NOV. LEGAL NOV. 93 RDA 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-52/.6 300-199-999-5207 001-1280 190-180-999-5246 001-130-999-5246 001-130-999-52~6 3,150.00 1,630.79 415.43 2,387.10 18,786.21 15,480.42 48,295.29 13231 01/11/94 000126 13231 01/11/94 000126 13231 01/11/94 000126 13231 01/11/94 000126 13231 01/11/94 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION OF DRAINAG INSTALLATION OF DRAIN L ADD LANDSCAPE NAINTENAN LANDSCAPE NAINT MEDIANS SERVICE AREA 190-180-999-5250 190-180-999-5250 190-180-999-5250 190-180-999-5250 191-180-999-5415 2,687.55 3,811.00 175.00 4,048.66 475.00 11,197.21 13232 01/11/94 000131 CARL WARREN & cO. 13232 01/11/94 000131 CARL WARREN & CO. 13232 01/11/94 000131 CARL WARREN & CO. 13232 01/11/94 000131 CARL WARREN & CO. 1:~ 01/11/94 000131 CARL WARREN & CO. 1: 01/11/94 000131 CARL WARREN & CO. 132~ 01/11/94 000131 CARL WARREN & CO. 13232 01/11/94 000131 CARL WARREN & CO. 13232 01/11/94 000131 CARL WARREN & CO. 13232 01/11/94 000131 CARL WARREN & CO. MILLER, CHARLES & SHARO SOUTHERN CAL EDISON SOUTHERN CAL EDISON KENNINGTON, JAMES H. NORALES-GARC1A STRAIGHT LINE GLASS MARY COX *LOSS 8/24/92 HORALES*LOSS 07107193 AMNONS* LOSS 7106193 BOHORQUEZ *LOSS 7/10/f3 300-199-999-5205 300-199-999-5205 300-199-999-5205 300-199-999-5205 300-199-999-5205 300-199-999-5205 300-199-999-5205 300-199-999-5205 300-199-999-5205 300-199-999-5205 196.13 236.75 253.75 174.13 225.38 151.13 68.13 22.75 63.13 157.88 1,549.16 13233 01/11/94 000153 CR&R INCORPORATED WASTE/RECYCLING 7/93-12 194-180-999-5315 674,605.80 674,605.80 13234 01/11/94 000164 ESGIL CORPORATION PLAN CHECK FOR NOV 1~3 001-162-999-5248 4,447.63 4,447.6,5 13235 01/11/94 000178 13235 01/11/94 000178 13235 01/11/94 000178 13235 01/11/94 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO HP DRAFTPRO PLUS PEN PL 320-1970 TAX 320-1970 4860X-66 VESA W/SNB RAM 320-1970 TAX 320-1970 3,939.00 305.27 3,690.00 285.97 8,220.24 13236 01/11/94 000202 J.F. DAVIDSON 13236 01/11/94 000202 J.F. DAVIDSON Professionat surveying 210-165-630-5804 DESIGN SERVICES FOR RAN 210-190-137-5802 1,765.00 3,900.00 5,665.00 13237 01/11/94 000220 13237 01/11/94 000220 13237 01/11/94 000220 13237 01/11/94 000220 13237 01/11/94 000220 13238 01/11/94 000267 13239 01/11/94 000269 13239 01/11/94 000269 lY"" 01/11/94 000269 NAURICE PRINTERS QUICK NAURICE PRINTERS QUICK NAURICE PRINTERS QUICK NAURICE PRINTERS QUICK NAURICE PRINTERS QUICK RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE D RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY DIVIDERS FOR ANNUAL REP COVER & BACK ANNUAL REP BLANK PAPER FOR ANNUAL BLACK COMB BINDERS TAX 001-140-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 JULY 1-SEPTEMBER 30 001-171-~-5251 COPIER/LASER PRINTER PA 330-199-999-5220 TAX 330-199-999-5220 COPIER/LASER PRINTER PA 330-199-999-5220 1,003.15 1,396.44 424.00 36.00 36.37 538.00 41.70 1,230.00 2,895.96 55,544.92 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA 12/29/93 13:01 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOB ALL PERIOOS PAGE 2 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOB VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 13239 01/11/94 000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY TAX 13240 01/11/94 000271 ROBERT BE]N, kl4 FROST & DESIGN OF NARGAR]TA RD. ACCOUNT NUMBER 330-199-999-5220 210-165-606-5802 ITEM AMOUNT 95.33 2,246.59 CHECK AMOUNT 1,905 2,246.59 13241 01/11/94 000310 TENECULA CREEK INN MEETING/DD 001-110-999-5260 13241 01/11/94 000310 TENECULA CREEK INN MEET[NG/SN 190-180~999-5260 13241 01/11/94 000310 TEMECULA CREEK INN CCleqlSSIONERS DINNER 001-100-999-5265 59.53 4&.91 2,273;00 Z,379.44 13242 01/11/94 000332 13242 01/11/94 000332 13243 01/11/94 000357 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATI VANDOBPE CHOU ASSOCIATI RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS. ADDITIONAL PLAN CHECK F PLAN CHECK NOV. 1~3 FY 93-94 TRAFFIC SIGNAL 001-162-~9-5248 001-162-~-5248 100-164-~-5405 959.53 493 ~ ~ 27,672.42 1,453.28 27,672.42 132/,4 01/11/94 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFORCEMENT 13244 01/11/94 000/,06 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFOBCEMENT 13244 01/11/94 000~06 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFOBCENENT 13244 01/11/94 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFONCEMENT 13244 01/11/94 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFOBCENIENT 13244 01/11/94 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFOBCEMENT 13244 01/11/94 000~06 RIVERSIDE COUNTY $HERIF LAW ENFOBCEMENT 13244 01/11/94 000~06 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHER[F LAW ENFOBCEMENT 13244 01/11/94 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY $HERIF LAW ENFOBCEMENT fOOT 199 001-170-999-5288 [OCT 199 001-170-999-5299 /OCT 199 001-170-999-5298 ~OOT 199 001-170-999-5290 /OCT 199 001-1230 /OOT 199 001-170-999-5291 fOOt 199 001-170-999-5281 fOOt 199 001-170-999-5282 /OOT 199 001-170-999-5262 207,882.55 15,981.17 17,827.60 5,838.40 5,546.48 5,546.48 18,054,09 2,722.32 15,978,90 295,377 13245 01/11/94 000481 GEOTECHN/CAL & ENVIRONM PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICA 280-199-805-5802 1,170~00 1,170.Uu 13246 01/11/94 000508 SAFEGUARD BUSINESS SYST CHECKS 001-140-999-5222 13246 01/11/94 000508 SAFEGUARD BUSINESS SYST LASER CHECKS 001-140-999-5222 13247 01/11/94 000678 RIVERSIDE COUNTY HEALTH ANIMAL CONTROL/OCTOBER 001-172-999-5255 13248 01/11/94 000689 CANPBELL'S LIGHTING SIG REPLACE TRANSFOBMERS 190-180-999-5212 13248 01/11/94 000689 CAMPBELL'S LIGHTING SIG MOVE & REPAIR CONDUIT 190-180-999-5212 15249 01/11/94 000712 FOBD, STEVEN J. Amendmnt No. 1 to Purc 250-190-129-5804 13249 01/11/94 000712 FORO, STEVEN J. NOV CRC FEES 250-190-129-5804 13250 01/11/94 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE PLAN CHECK & REVIEWS 190-180-999-5250 13250 01/11/94 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE LDSP PLAN CK & REVIEWS 193-180-999-5250 13250 01/11/94 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE LANOSCAPE REVIEW 001-161-999-5250 13250 01/11/94 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE PROVIOE UPOATE LOSP STA 193-180-999-5250 13250 01/11/94 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE AMOUNT INCOBRECTLY INVO 193-180-999-5250 1,214.03 84.28 5,764,91 249.27 1,229.83 5,280.00 480.00 900.00 225,00 1,750,00 800.00 200.00- 13251 01/11/94 000818 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE, INC RETENTION 210-2035 12,670.75 13252 01/11/94 000820 WINCHAK, KRIS NAP PLAN CHECK & LEGAL 001-163-999-5249 13252 01/11/94 000820 WINCHAK, KRIS CREDIT WORKERS CONP PRE 001-1182 13253 01/11/94 000845 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITI MEMBERSHIP THRU FEB 95 001-100-999-5226 13254 01/11/94 000881 OAKRIDGE LANDSCAPE/IRRI VIA LOBO LANDSCAPE 100-164-999-5401 2,250.00 151.63- 2,290.00 5,369.00 1,298.31 5,764.91 1,47~.10 5,760.00 3,475.00 12,670.75 2,098.37 2,290.00 5,369J3~ VOUCHRE2 PAGE 3 12/7""" 13:01 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 13255 13255 13255 13256 13256 13257 13257 13258 13258 13258 13259 13259 13259 13259 13259 13259 13259 1: 132..,y 13259 13259 13260 13261 13261 13261 13262 13262 13262 13262 13263 1326~ 1326~ CHECK DATE 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94' 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 VENDOR NUMBER 00088~ 00088~ 00088~ 000929 000929 000979 000979 001007 001007 001007 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001058 001124 001124 001124 001132 001132 001132 001132 001191 001231 001231 VENDOR NAME MONTELEONE EXCAVATING MONTELEONE EXCAVATING MONTELEONE EXCAVATING T.B. PENICK T.B. PENICK DEL RIO ENTERPRISE DEL RIO ENTERPRISE NPG CORP. NPG CORP. NPG CORP. EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANOSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE ACCURATE LANDSCAPE CUNNINGHAM-DAVIS CORP. CUNNINGHAM-DAVIS CORP. CUNNINGHAM-DAVIS CORP. ACCURATE CONSTRUCTION, ACCURATE CONSTRUCTION, ACCURATE CONSTRUCTION, ACCURATE CONSTRUCTION, C & C GRADING & PAVING AZTEC TECHNOLOGY CORP. AZTEC TECHNOLOGY CORP. CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERZOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION WORK ORDER NO. 93-94-81 28841VALLEJO CONSTRUCT JOHN UARNER RD CRC CONSTRUCT]ON TB PEN]CK RETENT]ON EMERGENCY P.O. FOR HAZ- la3RK ORDER #93-94-79 gORK ORDER #93-94-72 EXTRA WORK FOR PO #1476 PAUBA RD CURB SLOPE AREA A NAINTENANC NOV LANDSCAPE NAINTENAN IRRIGATION CONTROLLER R TRZN (18) EUCALYPTUS/LO LABOR TO REPAIR 2n FEBC MATERIAL (REPAIR KIT) V LABOR AND MATERIAL TO I LABOR AND MATERIAL TO R PREP SLOPE AND PLANT SH PROVIDE LABOR TO TRIM C PROVIDE LABOR TO REPAIR DEC. LANDSCAPE MAINT. DEC. MAINTENANCE PROVIDE LABOR~ MATERIAL RIVERTON PARK RETENTION STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT ACCURATE CONST RETENTIO I:q,193-01 JEFFERSON AVE S I, N3RK ORDER NO. 93-94-83 20~X40' STEEL CARGO CON TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER 100-16~-999-5402 100-164-999-5401 100-164-999-5401 250-190-129-5804 250-2035 100-164-999-5430 100-164-999-5402 100-164-999-5402 100-164-999-5402 100-164-999-5402 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 19~-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5250 210-190-131-5804 210-190-131-5804 210-2035 210-165-630-5804 210-165-630-580~ 210-2035 210-165-630-5804 100-164-999-5402 100-164-999-5610 100-164-999-5610 ITEM AMOUNT 2,300.00 400.00 890.00 206,580.00 20,658.00' 1,921.88 5,800.00 3,075.00 T52.00 430,00 1,073.75 4,295.00 125.00 1,350.00 75.00 45.00 300.00 420.00 520.00 150.00 384.00 11,302.24 6,172.00 163,929.74 7,870.26 17,180.00- 4,300.00 8.00 6,539.26- 61,084.55 8,049.24 2,695.00 208.86 CHECK AMOUNT 3,590.00 185,922.00 7,721.88 4,237.00 20,039.99 6,172.00 154,620.00 58,853.29 8,13/,9.24 2,903.86 TOTAL CHECKS 1,641,250.66 ITEM NO. APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER / CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer DATE: January 11, 1994 SUBJECT: City Treasurer's Report as of October 31, 1993 RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's report as of October 31, 1993. DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio and receipts, disbursemen~ and fund balance are required by Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the Code Sections as of October 31, 1993. FISCAL IMPACT: ATTACHMENTS: Norle 1. City Treasurer's Report as of October 31, 1993 2. Schedule of Fund Balances as of October 31, 1993 City of Temecula City Treasurer's Report As of October 31, 1993 Cash Activity for the Month of October: Cash and Investments as of October 1, 1993 Cash Receipts Cash Disbursements Cash and Investments as of October 31, 1993 41,131,409 1,437,579 (1,601,235) 40,967,753 Cash and Investments Portfolio: Type of Investment Petty Cash General Checking Benefit Demand Deposits Local Agency Investment Fund Deferred Compensation Fund Deferred Compensation Fund Defined Contribution Fund Trust Accounts-TCSD Bonds Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds Institution City Hall First Interstate First Interstate State Treasurer ICMA PEBSCO PEBSCO Bank of Amedca Bank of America Yield 4.380% 2.704% 2.704% Balance 800 25,275 4, 179 18,874,952 281,407 132,795 15,208 4,364,550 17,268,587 '40,967,753 (1) (1) (1)-This amount is net of outstanding checks. Per Govemment Code Requirements, this Treasurer's Report is in compliance with the City of Temecula's investment policy and there are adequate funds available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next thirly days. Prepared by Tim McDermott, Senior Accountant City of Temecula Schedule of Fund Balances As of October 31, 1993 Total Assets $ Less: Liabilities Total Fund Balances Less: Reserved Amounts (1) Less: Designated Amounts (2) Unreserved, Undesignated Fund Balances $ Community Services Redevelopment City District Agency 24,255,962 $ 2,876,427 $ 22,717,506 5,643,843 1,342,732 2,960,770 18,61 2, 119 1,533,695 19,756,736 2,632,603 1,533,695 5,080,089 10,431,908 14,676,647 5,647,608 $ 0 $ 0 $ Total 49,649,895 9,947,345 39,902,550 9,246,387 25,108,555 5,547,608 (1) Includes amounts reserved for encumbrances, land held for resale, long-term notes receivable, low/rood housing, and debt service. (2) Includes amounts designated for economic uncertainty, debt service, and continuing appropriations. ITEM 5 CITY MANAGER ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer DATE: January 11, 1994 SUBJECT: City Treasurer's Report as of November 30, 1993 RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's report as of November 30, 1993. DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio and receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the Code Sections as of November 30, 1993. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. City Treasurer's Report as of November 30, 1993 2. Schedule of Fund Balances as of November 30, 1993 City of Temecula City Treasurer's Report As of November 30, 1998 Cash Activity for the Month of November: Cash and Investments as of November 1, 1993 Cash Receipts Cash Disbursements Cash and Investments as of November 30, 1998 $ $ 40,967,753 1,575,572 (2,220,359) 40,322,966 Cash and Investments Portfolio: Type of Investment Petty Cash General Checking Benefit Demand Deposits Local Agency Investment Fund Deferred Compensation Fund Deferred Compensation Fund Defined Contribution Fund Trust Accounts-TCSD Bonds Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds Institution City Hall First Interstate First Interstate State Treasurer ICMA PEBSCO PEBSCO Bank of America Bank of America Yield 4.365% 2.732% 2.732% Balance 800 130, 107 4,876 18,074,953 281,407 132,795 15,208 4,374,573 17,308,247 40,322,966 (1) (1) (1)-This amount is net of outstanding checks. Per Government Code Requirements, this Treasurer's Report is in compliance with the City of Temecula's investment policy and there are adequate funds available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next thirty days. Prepared by Tim McDermott, Senior Accountant City of Temecula SChedule of Fund Balances As of November 30, 1993 Total Assets $ Less: Liabilities Total Fund Balances Less: Reserved Amounts (1) Less: Designated Amounts (2) Unreserved, Undesignated Fund Balances $ Commurljty Services Redevelopment City District Agency 24,256, 125 $ 2,347, 91 6 $ 22,761,179 5,790,988 1,189,306 3,001,705 18,465, 137 1,158,61 0 19,759,474 5,586,939 1,158,61 0 5,085,376 7,535,399 14,674,093 5,342,798 .$ 0 $ 0 $ Total 49,365,220 9,981,999 39,383,221 11,830,925 22,209,497 5,342,798 (1) Includes amounts reserved for encumbrances, land held for resale, long-term notes receivable, Iow/mod housing, and debt service. (2) Includes amounts designated for economic uncertainty, debt service, and continuing appropriations. ITEM NO. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAl CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Sarlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer January 11, 1994 "No Parking" Zone on Ynez Road from Rancho California Road to Rancho Highland Drive PREPARED BY: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer RECOMMENDATION: The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONE ON YNEZ ROAD FROM RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD TO RANCHO HIGHLAND DRIVE BACKGROUND: The Traffic Engineering Division has prepared a Striping Plan for Ynez Road south of Rancho California Road to accommodate the road reconfigurations constructed during the recent Ynez Road improvement project. The Ynez Road improvements have provided for two (2) through lanes southbound at the intersection with Rancho California Road. In order to properly transition traffic to one (1) lane south of the Rancho California Road intersection, the appropriate taper would preclude parking, which staff feels is appropriate. FISCAL IMPACT FY 93-94: Funds are available in the Department of Public Works Striping/Stenciling Account No. 100-164-999-5410. 600 feet of red curb ~ 60.581L.F. = ~348.00 Attachment: Resolution No. 94- Exhibit "A" -1- pwOS%egd~t~94%0111%011 lbJeu RESOLUTION NO. 94- ,_~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF T~IECULA F.~TABTJ~H/NG "NO PARKING' ZONE ON YNEZ ROAD FROM RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD TO RANCHO HIGm~AND DRIVE The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: Secilon 1. Pursuant to Section 12.08.216ofOrdinanceNo. 91-16, which the City has adopted by reference, the following *No Parking* zone is hereby established in the City of Temecula: 'No Parking' on both sides of Ynez Road from Rancho California Road to Rancho Highland Drive as shown on Exhibit 'A '. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Re,~lution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPT!~, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the llth day of January, 1994. Ronald H. Robens, Mayor A~rEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] -2- pwOS~egdrpt%94%0111%011 lb.leu YNEZ II ROAD RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD -- -- - -- RED CURB RANClIO HIGHLAND DRIVE i I No EXHIBIT "A" ITEM NO. 7 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL ~R~. CITY ATTORNEY /c- FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer January 11, 1994 Ordinance 94- Prima Facie Speed Limits on Certain Streets PREPARED BY: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer RECOMMENDATION: entitled: That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance ORDINANCE 94- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS BACKGROUND: Margarita Road was recently improved from Winchester Road south to Solana Way. Staff conducted a Traffic and Engineering Survey for Speed Zoning, as required by the California Vehicle Code, to determine if the existing maximum speed limit is reasonable. Staff found the critical speed (85th percentile) varied from 50 mph to 53 mph at three locations along this corridor. The critical speed is that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. Speed limits should be established preferably at or near the critical speed. The establishment of a speed limit of more than five (5) miles per hour below the 85th percentlie speed should be done with great care considering prevailing speeds, accident records, and those highway traffic and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. This portion of Margarita Road is partially improved, without concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and street lights. In addition, the roadway follows a curvilinear alignment with some unexpected driveway locations near Solana Way where the existing vertical curve do not provide sufficient sight distance to support the critical speed. Due to these unusual conditions, not readily apparent to the motorist, staff recommends a posted speed of 45 mph. Onis Ol -1- FISCAL IMPACT: Install four (4) "45 Miles Per Hour" signs (4 @ $125 each) = $500 ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance 94- Ods 01 -2- ORDINANCE NO. 94- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SI'Em~B LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The City of Temecula finds and determines that from time to time it is necessary to add or modify existing prima facie sr, ccd limits within the City for certain streets, or pans of streets. SECTION 1. Section 10.28.010(d) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to add the following streets: *Nsune of Street nnd Portion Affected Declared Prima Facie Speed Limit. Miles Per Hour Margarita Road - Winchester Road to Solaria Way SECTION 2. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining pans of this Ordinance. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by hw. SECTION 4. l~.ffecfive r~te. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places. SECTION S. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. Oeis 01 PASSED AlPROVED.AND ADOPTED this day of ,1994. Ronald H. Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the forgoing Ordinance No. 94- was dully introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 1994, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regHlnr meeting of the City Council on the day of , 1994, by the following vote: 0 CO~CILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 CO~C~ERS: ABSENT: 0 CO~CILlV~ERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk Ords 01 ITEM NO. 8 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAl CITY ATTORNEY ~..~,~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer January 11, 1994 All Way Stop, Pauba Road at Meadows Parkway PREPARED BY: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "STOP SIGNS" BACKGROUND: Staff had been asked to analyze the possibility of adding two (2) stop signs on Pauba Road at Meadows Parkway which would make it an ell-way stop. The California Department of Transportation Traffic Manual identifies criteria along with three (3) specific warrants for the consideration of multi-way stops. Although these three (3) warrants are not met, other factors that may be considered include, sight distance, local travel patterns and any other site specific impacts. A field review revealed that northbound vehicles on Meadows Parkway, stopped at the stop sign, have substandard visibility of vehicles approaching from the west on Pauba Road. This limitation also exists for pedestrians crossing on their way home from school. Existing traffic volumes entering on Pauba Road and Meadows Parkway are nearly balanced with a 45%-55% split. Based on limited visibility and the near balance of vehicles entering the intersection, staff recommends two (2) additional stop signs for Pauba Road at Meadows Parkway. pwOE~egdq~t~94~011 l~llwey.elle 0111 FISCAL IMPACT: ~_~ Two (2) stop ahead signs, at ~125.00 = $250.00 Two (2) stop signs, at ~125.00 each = ~250.00 Eight (8) legends at e24.00 = $192.00 Limit line - 30 LF. at 80.45 = ~13.50 Four (4) all-way signs, at $5.00 = e20.00 TOTAL $725.50 Funds are available in the Department of Public Works Signs Account Number 100-164-999- NOTE: All work to be done by City Maintenance Crews except pavement markings which are awaiting new stencil truck. Attachment: Resolution No. 94- pwO5%agdrpt~94~011 l~llway.ftp 0111 Section 2. Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TF_,MECULA ESTABLISHING "STOP" SIGNS The City Counc~ of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: Section 1. PtLrsuant to Section 10.12.100 of the Municipal Code, the following "STOP" sign locations are hereby established in the City of Temecula. A. Westbound Pauba Road (~ Meadows Parkway B. Eastbound Pauba Road @ Meadows Parkway The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this PASSED, APPROVE!} AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the llth day of January, 1994. Ronald H. Roberrs, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek City Clerk [SEAL] Re,o, 01 ITEM NO. APPROVAT. CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer January 11, 199~ Authorization To Execute Supplemental Agreement For The Use of 19th Year Community Development Block Grant Funds PREPARED BY: Luci Romero, Financial Services Administrator RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize the Mayor to execute the Supplemental Agreement for the 19th Year Community Development Block Grant Funds. DISCUSSION: On March 23, 1993, the City Council approved the 19th year Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) fund projects. The U.S. Department of Housing Urban Development (HUD) provides CDBG funding for local projects which meet at least one of the following nationally established goals: Low/moderate income persons are primarily benefitted by the activity; or The activity aids in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or The activity meets an urgent (emergency) community development need. The City's 1993-94 approved projects are as follows: Alternatives to Domestic Violence . Sam Hick Park Handicapped Access Improvements Operation School Bell Pujoi Street Improvements 10,000 30,000 10-_O()0 22,660 Execution of the CDBG 19th Year Supplemental Agreement facilitates CDBG funding for the above projects. FISCAL IMPACT: None. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 File: 1.TM001, 012, 014, 1,053 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE USE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE of the State of California, herein called, "COUNTY," and the City of Temecula, herein called "CITY," mutually agree as follows: 1. GENERAL. COUNTY and CITY have executed a Cooperation Agreement dated August 28, 1990, whereby CITY elected to participate with COUNTY, which has qualified as an ".Urban County" for purposes of receiving Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, and to assist and undertake essential community development and housing assistance activities pursuant to the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, hereinafter referred to as "Act". Said Cooperation Agreement dated August 28, 1990, is incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Agreement as if each and'every provision was set forth herein. 2. PURPOSE. CITY promises and agrees to undertake and assist with the community development activities, within its jurisdiction, by utilizing the sum of $172,660, CDBG Entitlement Funds, as specifically identified in Exhibits "A," "B," "C," and "D," respectively, which are attached hereto and by this reference are incorporated herein, for the.projects: Alternatives to Domestic Violence $10,000 Sam Hicks Park Handicapped Access Improvements $30,000 Operation School Bell $10,000 Pujol Street Improvements $122,660. CITY shall obtain COUNTY's approval, through the Economic Development Agency, of the projects plans and specifications prior 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 to CITY's construction of same. CITY promises and agrees to utilize and maintain the projects for a minimum period of five (5) years or the life of the project, whichever is less. 3. TERM OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement shall become effective upon execution and shall continue in full force and effect for a period of one (1) year from July 1, 1993 to June 30° 1994, and proceed consistent with the completion schedule set forth in Exhibits "A," "B," "C," and "D." If substantial compliance with the completion schedule, due to unforeseen or uncontrollable circumstances, cannot be met by CITY, the schedule for the projects may be extended. If substantial progress toward completion, as determined by COUNTY, of the projects is not made during the term of the Supplemental Agreement, the entitlement funds associated with the projects may be reprogrammed by COUNTY after appropriate notice is given CITY. 4. DISPOSITION OF FUNDS. COUNTY's Board of Supervisors shall determine the final disposition and distribution of all funds received by COUNTY under the Act consistent with the provisions of Paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Agreement. COUNTY, through its Economic Development Agency, shall: (1) make payment of the grant funds to CITY as designated in Exhibits "A," "B," "C," and "D," and (2)'monitor the project activity to ensure compliance with, applicable federal regulations and the terms of this Agreement. CITY shall comply with timely drawdown of funds by submitting monthly requests for reimbursement. All disbursements of grant funds will be on a reimbursement basis and made within thirty (30) days after the CITY has submitted its letter identifying payments made and requesting 2 1~ reimbursement. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 5. COOPERATION WITH HOUSING ASSISTANCE ACTIVITIES. CITY shall cooperate with COUNTY in undertaking essential community development and housing assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and public assistance housing, and shall assist COUNTY in carrying out its housing assistance plans, Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy, and other requirements of the Community Development Block Grant Program. CDBG Housing Plan. 6. LEAD AGENCY FOR CITY shall adhere to the COUNTY COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY ACT (CEOA]. Pursuant to Section 15051(d) of Title 14 of the California Administrative Code, CITY is designated as the lead agency for the projects that are the subject matter of. this Agreement. 7. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION. CITY shall comply 16 with all applicable laws, rules and regulations, and shall 17 indemnify, save'and hold harmless COUNTY and its agency members and 18 their respective agents, servants and employees of and from any and 19 all liabilities, claims, debt, damages, demands, suits, actions and 20 causes of action of whatsoever kind, nature or sort including, but 21 not by way of limitation, wrongful death, expenses of the defense 22 of said parties, and the payment of attorney's fees, arising out of 23 or in any manner connected with the performance by CITY under this 24 Agreement. 25 8. RECORDS AND INSPECTIONS. 26 a. CITY shall establish and maintain records in 27 accordance with 24 C.F.R. Part 570 and Part 85 and OMB Circular A- 87 as applicable and as they relate to the acceptance and use of 3 1 federal funds under this Agreement. 2 b. CITY shall maintain a separate account for CDBG 3 Entitlement funds received as set forth in Exhibits "A," "B," "C," 4 and "D." 5 c. CITY shall, during the normal business hours, make 6 available to COUNTY and to the Department of Housing and Urban 7 Development for examination and copying all of its records and 8 other materials with respect to matters covered by this Agreement. 9 ~"d. CITY shall not retain all program income as 10 defined in Section 570,500 of Title 24 of the Federal Code of .11 Regulations. 12 9. FEDERAL REOUIREMENTS. CiTY shall comply with the 13 provisions of the Act and any amendments thereto and the federal 14 regulations and guidelines now or hereafter enacted pursuant to the 15 Act. More particularly, CITY is to comply with those regulations 16 found in Part 85 and Part 570 of Title 24 of the Code of Federal 17 Regulations. CiTY is to comply with OMB Circular A-87, or any 18 subsequent replacement. CITY is to abide by the provisions of the 19 Community Development Block Grant Manual, prepared by COUNTY and 20 cited in the above-mentioned Cooperation Agreement. 21 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and its agents, servants 22 and employees shall act ~t all times in an independent capacity 23 during the term of this Agreement, and shall not act as, shall not 24 be, nor shall they in any manner be construed to be agents, 25 officers or employees of the COUNTY. 26 11. TERMINATION. 27 a. CITY. CITY may not terminate this Agreement 28 except upon express written consent of COUNTY. 4 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 federal, state rendering any untenable; or b. COUNTY. Notwithstanding the provisions of Paragraph lla, COUNTY may suspend or terminate this Agreement upon written notice to CITY of action being taken and the reason for such action: (1) In the event CITY fails to perform the covenants herein contained at such times and in such manner as provided in this Agreement; and (2) In the event there is a conflict with any or local law, ordinance, regulation or rule of the provisions of this Agreement invalid or (3) In the event the funding from the Department of Housing and Urban Development referred to in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above is terminated or otherwise becomes unavailable. c. Upon suspension of this Agreement, CITY agrees to 16 return.any unencumbered funds which it has been provided by COUNTY. 17 In accepting said funds, COUNTY does not waive any claim or cause 18 of action it may have against CITY for breach of this Agreement. 19 d. Upon suspension of this Agreement, CITY agrees not 20 to incur any additional cost with regard to the projects that are 21 cited in the written notice as necessitating the suspensions. 22 12. NONDISCRIMINATION. CITY shall abide by Sections 23 570,601 and 570,602 of Title 24 of the Federal Code of Regulations 24 which requires that no person in the United States shall on the 25 grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex, be excluded from 26 participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to 27 discrimination under any program or activity funded in whole or in part with Community Development funds. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 13. PROHIBITION AGAINST CONFLICTS OF INTEREST a. CITY and its assigns, employees, agents, consultants, officers and elected and appointed officials shall become familiar with and shall comply with the CDBG regulations prohibiting conflicts of interest contained in 24 CFR 570.611, attached hereto as Exhibit "C__I" and by'this reference incorporated herein. b. CITY and its assigns, employees, agents, consultants,'officers, and elected and appointed officials shall become familiar with and shall comply with Section A-11 of the County's CDBG Policy manual, attached hereto as Exhibit "C__I" and by this reference incorporated herein. c. CITY understands and agrees that no waiver of exception can be granted to the prohibition against conflict of interest except upon written approval of HUD pursuant to 24 CFR 570,611 (d). Any request by CITY for an exception shall first be reviewed by COUNTY to determine whether such request is appropriate for submission to HUD. In determining whether such request is appropriate for submission to HUD, COUNTY will consider the factors listed in 24 CFR 570,611 (e). d. Prior to any funding under this Agreement, CITY shall provide COUNTY with a list of all employees, agents, consultants, officers and elected and appointed officials who are in a position to participate in a decision making process, exercise any functions or responsibilities, or gain inside information with respect to the CDBG activities funded under this Agreement. CITY shall also promptly disclose to COUNTY any potential conflict, including even the appearance of conflict, 6 1 that may arise with respect to the CDBG activities funded under this Agreement. 3 e. Any violation of this section shall be deemed a 4 material breach of this Agreement, and the Agreement shall be 5 immediately terminated by the COUNTY. 6 14. PROJECT ELIGIBILITY. As to CITY or its claimants, 7 COUNTY shall bear no liability for any later determination by the 8 United States Government, the Department of Housing and Urban 9 Development or any other person or entity that CITY.is'or is not 10 eligible under 24 C.F.R. Part 570 to receive CDBG funds. 11 15. EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES TO BE CAUSED BY PROJECT. City 12 agrees to require and to require any lessee or assignee to notify 13 Riverside County JTPD (Jobs Training Partnerships Department) and 14 GAIN - Department of Public Social Services of any and all job openings that are caused by this project. 16 16. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. It is expressly agreed that this 17 Agreement embodies the entire agreement of the parties in relation 18 to the subject matter thereof, and that no other Agreement or 19 understanding, verbal or otherwise, relative to this subject 20 matter, exists between the parties at the time of execution. 21 17. MINISTERIAL ACTS. The Director of the COUNTY's 22 Economic Development Agency or his or her designee(s) are 23 authorized to take such ministerial actions as may be necessary or 24 appropriate to implement the terms, provisions, and conditions of 25 this Agreement as it may be amended from time to time by COUNTY. 26 27 1 18. MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement may be 2 modifiedor amended only by a writing signed by the duly authorized 3 and empowered representative of COUNTY and CITY respectively. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24. 25 26 27 28 DATED: ATTEST: GERALD A. MALONEY Clerk of the Board COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE .By: Chairman, Board of'Supervisors By: Deputy (Seal) DATED: ATTEST: CITY OF TEMECULA By: City Clerk By: Mayor 8 EXHIBIT A FILE: 0. 102 Page 1 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT Cock .fative Agency: Alternatives to Domestic Violence Address: P.O. Box 910, Riverside, CA 92502 Project Title: Alternatives to Domestic Violence Location: Western Riverside County Description: This agency serves battered spouses who are victims of domestic violence. CDBG funds will be utilized to offset costs a~sociated with the operation and administration of the agency's toll free crisis line, three regional outreach centers which provide advocacy and counseling services, emergency food, clothing and shelter as well as community education presentations. This project serves limited clientele; therefore, the attached document for Direct Benefits needs to be filled out and submitted to the County of Riverside EDA on a monthly basis. Should there be no services rendered, submit a form indicating NO SERVICE. Pro/iect Budget: Cost CDBG ADDroved 1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $ 2) Administration Costs 75,865 10,000 3) Planning Costs 4) Acquisition Costs 5) Construction Costs 6) Relocation Costs 7) Equipment Costs 8) Other Costs 9) Operation/Maintenance 10) Contingency TOTAL $ 75,865 $ 10,000' ,Note: This project is being administered on behalf of the City of Temecula by theCounty of Riverside. See Countywide Sponsor's Agreement between the County ar lternatives to Domestic Violence governingthe expenditure of these 19th year CDb~ funds (File #0.102). EXHIBIT B Page 1 FILE: 1.TM012 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT Cooperative Agency: City of Temecula - Community Services District Address: 43174 Business Park Dr., Temecula, CA 92590 Project Title: Sam Hicks Park Handicapped Access Improvements Location: Mercedes and Moreno St.. Temecula0 CA Description: The City of Temecula plans to utilize CDBG funds to construct park improvements designed to-remove architectural barriers for handicapped persons at Sam Hicks Park. These improvements will include the installation of interior sidewalks, play area curbing, handicapped picnic tables, handicapped drinking fountain and a safe-play resilient surface in the tot lot play equipment area. The proposed modifications will assist the City of Temecula in complying with ADA requirements. Project Budget: Cost CDBG ADDroved 1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $ 2) Administration Costs 3) Planning Costs 4) Acquisition Costs 5) Construction Costs 6) Relocation Costs 7) Equipment Costs 8)-Other Costs 9) Operation/Maintenance 10) Contingency TOTAL $ 30,000 30,000 30°000 $ 30,000 EXHIBIT B Page 2 FILE: 1. TM0 12 Tim, ~ble Implementation Schedule Milestone Prepare Plans, Specifications and Bid Documents Advertise for Bid Award Contract Notice to Proceed Construction Start Date 11/01/93 02/15/94 04/01/94 04/15/94 05/01/94 Completion Date 02/01/9'4 03/15/94 04/01/94 06/~0/94 EXHIBIT B Page 3 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PROJECT SUMMARY PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY TO 1. NAME OF APPLICANT County of Riverside 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER B-93-UC-06-0506 x Original (each year) .Revision, Date Amendment, Date FROM July 1, 1993 5. NAME OF PROJECT Sam Hicks Park Handicapped Access Improvements 8. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT City of Temecula Community Services District June 30° 1994 6. PROJECT NUMBER 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATdS 1.TM012 Categorically Excluded 9. TELEPHONE NUMBER (909) 694-6480 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT The City of Temecula plans to utilize CDBG funds. to construct park improvements designed to remove architectural barriers for handicapped persons at Sam Hicks Park. These improvements will include the installation of interior sidewalks, play area curbing, handicapped picnic tables, handicapped drinking fountain and a safe-play resilient surface in the tot lot play equipment area. The proposed modifications will assist the City of Temecula in complying with ADA requirements. ELIGIBILITY: 570.201(k) BENEFIT: 570.208(a)(2) Check if continued on additional page(s) and attach. 11. CENSUS TRACT(S)/ENUMERATION DISTRICT(S) Presumed Benefit Limited Clientele Activity 12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS Project will assist the City of temecula in complying with ADA requirements. Project will also enhance recreational opportunities for handicapped residents in the City. Check if-continued on additional pages(s) and attach. 13. CDBG 'COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS(in thousands of $) (List component activities using names CDBG OTHER of activities shown in Part A, COST Low/Mod Other Amount Source SUMMARY, Form HUD-7067.) Benefit Benefit (a) Architectural Barriers Removal (b) (c) (d) (e) S30,000 S S 14. Totals $30,000 15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Grant Funds (Sum of Columns b and c) $30,000 EXHIBIT C r"iLL: 1.TMO14 Page 1 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT Cooperative Agency: City of Temecula Address: 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula Project Title: Operation School Bell Location: P.O, Box 1212, Temecula0 CA 92593 Description: The Assistance League of Temecula Valley operates the Operation School Bell program which provides proper school clothing'to needy youth from qualified households attending school in Temecula, Murrieta and Lake Elsinore. CDBG funds will be used to purchase enough clothing for approximately 150 children. This project serves limited clientele; therefore, the attached document for Direct Benefits needs to be filled out and submitted to the County of Riverside EDA on a monthly basis, Should there be no services rendered, submit a form indicating NO SERVICE. Pro~iect Budget: Cost CDBG ADDroved 1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $ 2) Administration Costs 3) Planning Costs 4) Acquisition Costs 5) Construction Costs 6) Relocation Costs 7) Equipment Costs 8) Other Costs 10,000 (purchase clothing supplies) 9) Operation/Maintenance 10) Contingency .~. TOTAL $ 100000 10,000 $ 10,000 EXHIBIT C Page 2 1.i'M014 Timetable Implementation Schedule Milestone Obtain bids for clothing Purchase clothing Submit claim for clothing to City Begin Distribution of clothing Submit Status Report Complete project Start Date 11/01/93 12/01/93 01/01/94 02/01/94 Completion Date 12/01/93 12/15/93 0i/i5/94 02/28/94 06/30/94 EXHIBIT C Page 3 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FROM July 1. 1993 5. NAME OF PROJECT Operation School Bell PROJECT SUMMARY PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY TO 1. NAME OF APPLICANT County of Riverside 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER B-93-UC-06-0506 June 30, 1994 Original (each year) Revision, Date Amendment, Date 6. PROJECT NUMBER 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS 1.TM014 Exempt 8. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT Assistance League of Temecula Valley 9. TELEPHONE NUMBER (909) 677-8566 Bonnie Hinman 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT The Assistance League of Temecula Valley operates the Operation School Bell program which provides proper school clothing to needy youth from qualified households attending school in Temecula, Murrieta and Lake Elsinore. CDBG funds will be used to purchase enough clothing for approximately 150 children. ELIGIBILITY: 570.201(e) BENEFIT: 570.208(a) (2) Check if continued on additional page(s) and attach. 11. CENSUS TRACT(S)/ENUMERATION DISTRICT(S) Limited Clientele Activity 12~ ~TICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS Program anticipates clothing approximately 600 eligible children during the coming program year from throughout Southwest Riverside County area. Check if continued on additional pages(s) and attach. 13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS(in thousands of $) (List component activities using names CDBG of activities shown in Part A, COST Low/Mod SUMMARY, Form HUD-7067.] Benefit Other Amount Benefit (a) (b) (c) (d) Public Service $10,000 $ $ OTHER Source (e) 14. Totals $10,000 S $ 15~-Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Grant Funds (Sum of Columns b and c) $10,000 EXHIBIT D Page 1 PILE: I.UD~ SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT Cooperative Agency: City of Temecula Public Works Dept. Address: 43174 Business Park Dr. Project Title: Pu~ol Street Improvements Location: Pujol Street between 1st Street and the Temecula Town Association Description: The "City of Temecula will utilize CDBG. funds to construct improvements to Pujol Street in Old Town Temecula. The improvements will include roadway widening and the installation of curb, gutter and sidewalk on East side of Pujol Street from the Temecula Town Association to First Street. Project Budget: Cost CDBG ADDroved 1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs 2 .dministration Costs 3) Planning Costs 4) Acquisition Costs 5) Construction Costs 6) Relocation Costs 7) Equipment Costs 8) Other Costs 9) Operation/Maintenance 10) Contingency TOTAL $ $ 122,660 122,660 $ 122,660 $ 122,660 EXHIBIT D Page 2 Timetable Implementation Schedule Milestone Prepare Plans, Specifications and Bid Documents Advertise for Bid Award Contract Notice to Proceed Construction Start Date 07/01/93 10/01/93 11/30/93 12/15/93 01/0~/94 Completion Date 09/01/93 11/09/93 11/30/93 03/01/94 EXHIBIT D Page 3 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FROM PROJECT SUMMARY PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY TO July 1. 1993 FILE: 1.OD3 1. NAME OF APPLICANT County of Riverside 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER B-93-UC-06-0506 June 30, 1994 x Original (each year) Revision, Date Amendment, Date 5. NAME OF PROJECT Pujol Street 8. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT City of Temecula Public Works Dept. 6. PROJECT NUMBER 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS 1.053 Negative Declaration 9. TELEPHONE NUMBER (909) 694-6411 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT The City of Temecula will utilize CDBG funds to construct improvements to Pujol Street in Old Town Temecula. The improvements will include roadway widening and the installation of curb, gutter and sidewalk on East'side of Pujol Street from the Temecula Town Association to First Street. ELIGIBILITY: 570.201(c) BENEFIT: 570.208(b)(1) Check if continued on additional page(s) and attach. 11. CENSUS TRACT(S)/ENUMERATION DISTRICT(S) Slum and Blight Removal t~ ~NTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS Project will enhance traffic and pedestrian circulation as well as improve existing drainage conditions. Project will eliminate a slum and blighting condition as identified in the Redevelopment plan. Check if continued on additional pages(s) and attach. 13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS(in thousands of $) (List component activities using names CDBG of activities shown in Part A, COST Low/Mod SUMMARY, Form HUD-7067.) Benefit Other Amount Benefit (a) Public Facilities and Improvements (b) (c) (d) $122,660 $ $ OTHER Source (e) 14. Totals $122,660 $ $ 1. 9otal Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Grant Funds (Sum of Columns b and c) $122,660 Pron~D~on Against Conilia-- oI lnneresn EXHIBIT CI , page 1 of 4 570.611 Conflict of interest. (a) (1) Applicability. In the procurement of supplies, equipment, construction, and services'by recipients, and by subrecipients (including those specified at S 570.204(c)), the conflict of interest provisions in 24 CFR 85.36 and OMB Circular A 110, respectively, shall apply. (2) In all cases not governed by 24 CFR 85.36 and OMB Circular A-110, the provisions of this section shall apply. Such cases include the acquisition and disposition of real property and the provision of assistance by the recipient, by its subrecipients, or to individuals, businesses and other private entities under eligible activities which authorize such assistance (e.g., rehabilitation, preservation, and other improvements of private properties or facilities pursuant to S 570.202, or grants, loans and other assistance to businesses, individuals and other private entities pursuant to S 570.203, § 570.204. or § 570.455). (b) Conflicts prohibited. Except for the use of CDBG funds to pay salaries and other related administrative or personnel costs, the general rule is that no persons described in paragraph (c) of this section who exercise or have exercised any functions or responsibilities with .respect to CDBG activities assisted under this part or who are in a position to participate in a decision-making process or gain inside information with regard to such activities, may obtain a personal or financial interest or benefit from a CDBG assisted activity, or have an intere'~, in any contract, subcontract or agreement with respect thereto, or the procee,.- thereunder, either for themselves or those with whom they have family or business ties, during their tenure or for one year thereafter. For the UDAG program, the above restrictions shall apply to all activities that are a part of the UDAG project, and shall cover any such interest or benefit during, or at any time after, such person's tenure. (c) Persons covered. The conflict of interest provisions of paragraph (b) of this section apply to any person who is an employee, agent, consultant, officer, or elected official or appointed official of the recipient, or of any designated public agencies, or subrecipients which are receiving funds under this part. (d) ExcePtions: threshold requirements. Upon the written request of the recipient, HUD may grant an exception to the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section on a case-by-case basis when it determines that such an exception will serve to further the purposes of the Act and the effective and efficient administration of the recipient's program or project. An exception may be considered only after the recipient has provided the following: (1) A disclosure of the nature of the conflict, accompanied by an assurance that there has been public disclosure of the conflict and a description of how the public disclosure was made; and Prohibition Against Conflicts-of Interest EXHIBIT CI, page 2 of 4 (e) (2) An opinion of the recipient's attorney that the interest for which the exception is sought would not Violate State or local law. Factors to be considered for exceptions. In determining whether to grant a requested exception after the recipient has satisfactorily met the requirements of paragraph (d) of this section, HUD shall consider the cumulative effect of the following factors, where applicable: (i) Whether the exception would provide a significant cost benefit or an essential degree of expertise to the program or project which would otherwise not be available; (2) Whether an opportunity was provided for open competitive bidding or negotiation; (3) Whether the person affected is a member of a group or class of low or moderate income persons intended to be the beneficiaries of the assisted activity, and the exception will permit such person to receive generally the same interests or benefits as are being made available or provided to the group or class; (4) Whether the affected person has withdrawn from his or her functions or responsibilities, or the decision-making process with respect to the specific assisted activity in question; (5) Whether the interest or benefit was present before the affected person was in a position as described in paragraph (b) of this section; (6) Whether undue hardship will result either to the recipient or the person affected when weighed against the public interest served by avoiding the prohibited conflict; and (7) Any other relevant considerations. .Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest Exhibit CI, page 3 of 4 Community Dvlpmt. Block Grant Policy Manual I.D. # A-11 (pg. 1 of 2) TOPIC: CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODED RIVERSIDE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: October 1989 This Conflict of Interest Code is written to comply with Federal Regulations (24 CFR Part 85). These Regulations. "Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State, Local and Federally Recognized Indian Tribal .Governments" require that grantees and sub-grantees will maintain a written code of standards of conduct governing the performance of their employees engaged in the award and administration of contracts. 1) No employee, officer or agent of the grantee shall participate in the selection, in the award or in the administration of a contract supported Federal Funds if a conflict of interest, real or apparent, would be involved 2) Such a conflict will arise when: i) The employee, officer or agent; ii) Any member of the immediate family; iii) His/Her partners, or; iv) An organization which employs, or is about to employ any of the above has a financial or other interest in the firm's selection for award. 3) The grantee's or sub-grantee's officers, employees or agents will neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors or anything of monetary value from contractors or parties to sub-agreements except as noted in Section 4. 4) A grantee's or sub-grantee's officers, employees or agents will be presumed to have a financial interest in a business if their financial interest exceeds the following: i) Any business entity in which the official has a direct or indirect investment worth one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more. ii) Any real property in which the official has a direct or indirect interest worth one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more. ~ Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest Exhibit CI, page 4 of 4 TOPIC: DATE: iii) iv) v) 5) Community Dvlpmt. Block Grant Policy Manual I.D. # A-11 (pg. 2 of 2) CONFLICT. OF INTEREST CODE RIVERSIDE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY October 1989 Any source of income, other than gifts and other than loans by a commercial lending institution in the regular course of business on terms available to the public without regard to official status, aggregating two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value provided to, received by or promised to the official within 12 months prior to the time when the decision is made. Any business entity in which the official is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or holds any position of management. Any donor of, or any intermediary or agent for a donor of, a gift or gifts aggregating two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value provided to, received by, or promised to the official within 12 months prior to the time when the decision is made. For purposes of Section 4, indirect investment or interest means any investment or interest owned by the spouse or dependent child of an official, by an agent on behalf of an official, or by a business entity or trust in which the official, the official's agents, spouse, and dependent children own directly, indirectly, or beneficially a 10-percent interest or more. ITEM NO. 10 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council June S. Greek, City Clerk January 11, 1994 Letter of Support for ABo927 RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff to prepare a letter indicating City Council support of Assembly Bill No. AB-927 as it will be reintroduced in the 1994 Legislative Session. BACKGROUND: The City Council has received correspondence dated December 27, 1993 from Trudy K. Thomas requesting an official letter of support for AB927. Staff has been advised that this bill is tentatively scheduled to be heard in the Assembly Public Safety Committee during the week of January 10th,. so a letter could be transmitted to the committee via FAX if this is the Council's desire. JSG R:~gende.fl~',ABI27 I 4tq86 cjHaxJno~tla t__~t~z~ · c/lt[.~izta, Cc4 9~6z · 9o9 /6T/-a?6~ MEMORANDUM DATE: FROM: December 27, 1993 June Greek, City Clerk - City of Temecula Trudy Thomas, Chairperson, SW Riverside County Care Coalition Letter of Support for AB927 Please see attached documents, We are requestinS a letter of support for AS927 as it will be reintroduced in January of the i°~4 Le'i . ... ~ slative Session Either a letter from the City or from individual Councilmen and Staff would be appreciated. Mill =~.' ~ ~, of January, (the dat~ o~ your ~ It, Sacramento +h~ ll~h , r~c'-xt ~o~,r,~ meeting) but i car, have a representative receive the ...... = ,,. ~r o, suppot+ Please contact me at 677-4761 or Thar, l~ you. NaT ONg CBwER for Children and Families AB-927 - "THE SEXUALLY EXPLOITED CHILDREN'S ACT" IOAID OF ~ECTOIS H. I~OEIfi' SHOWERS, ~SQIJtE Paint. Gem'~n & (rqe P.C. Wgsmgan. O.C ~N[ WAJID. ESOUIRE ImmmlL~wCeefef~Chdom~&fenlg Pame. Poe,f, lkmv, Word & Cevnn ElINEST ALAN. ESOIJW,[ I~ml Ce~m te,' Atem M~5. JIJDY BUICK /uexonam. Va'.mn~ ~S. DEE Nomaol (ommgn. h~x. V.k!~ DR JEERY IORI( Cm OOI.D P. I~KMtP, [50UIR[ Po~me Km~, ~r~ & I(jeco~ DR IUCIVdlD LIND im',m~ 5,feint, (.hn~ late I~OBERI IAC~. ESOUE RICF~D 5(HWMB, ESOelE W~. D.C JOHN [ S~JiBO, REVEREND MY WOLr According to the SexuaUy Exploited Child- Unit of the Los Angeles Police Department, the sexual exploitation of children is manifested in three primary categories: 1) the physical molestation of children; 2) child prostitution; 3) child pornography. All three categories are interests of the pedophile, for without such individuals them would be litde demand for these perversities. Some pedophiles seek employment or volunteer programs involving children. Pornographic material depicting children involved in sexual activities is frequdntly utilized to do the following: 1) sexually stimulate the toolester; 2) alesensitize children and educate them as to the desire of the toolester; 3) blackmail children into silence; 4) facilitate the molestation of additional children. The disribution of child pornography involves an international, underground "cottage" network of pedophiles. ' California's current law is far too lenient and fails to protect all of Calffornia's children. For example, possession of child pornography is a misdemeanor offense, but only ff the child depicted is under 14 years of age. The distribution of child pornography is a misdemeanor offense, but only ff the child depicted is under 17 years of age. Federal law and the laws of several other states protect all children under the age of 18 and make these offenses felonies. AB-927 will do the following: Raise the age to under 18 years in all child pomography and sexual exploitation statutes. This is crucial for two masons: (1) Quite often child development experts will disagree as to whether a child is under 14 years, even though they can all agree that the child is under 18 years; therefore, when this happens, a possession case can't be prosecuted successfully; (2) Raising the age to under 18 years would make these laws consistent with California's laws which prohibit sexual conduct involving a person under 18 years. (Plans are underway to intreduce other pwvisions which were in AB-927 as separate Bills in 1994. They will strengthen these hws further.) AB-927 does not change any substantive definitions in the current laws whatsoever. Therefore, it creates no First Amendment or any other constitutional problems. The U.S. S~preme Co-rt has consistently held that child l;~ornography is not protected bv the First Amendmen*.. New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747 (1982) and Osborne v. Ohio, 169 L.Ed.2d 98 (1990). This Bill, which was drafted by the National Law Center for Children and Families, is scheduled to be reheard in the Assembly Public Safety Committee in January, 1994. 10~/93 ,'~tiotuzl Office 3.97.5 Univemn.- Drive. Suite 320 Faiffax. Virgnnia 220.=0 ("03~ 6914626 · ('03:691-4600 FAX l~st Coast Office 121 E..Dyer Road. Suite 220 Santa Aria. Calfforma 9~05 · C714) 43-5-9090 · (714) ,i3'~4B23 FAX California and Child Pornography Santa Rosa Press Democrat, October 23, 1993 - Sonoma County man was convicted on 76 counts of felony child molestation recorded on a videotape. The children, ages 4, 6, and 7 were coerced into sex acts with adults, including their mother and each other. Los Angeles, KNBC T.V, Ocwber 22, 1993 - News at 5:00 and 6:00 P.M. 59 year-old male held on one million dollar bond after his arrest for possession of child pornography by Riverside County Sheriffs Department Officers seized over 100 Polaroid photos, over 20 videotapes of 100 boys ages 10-16, and over 100 "kiddie pore' magazines. Three boys have been identified; many believed to be homeless, nm-aways who accepted food or money in exchange for sex with the suspect who resides in Palm Springs. Los Angeles, October 5, 1993, KNBC "Nightside News" - L.A.P.D. Sexually Exploited Child Unit requested public's help in identifying adult male and fernale in photos depicting their graphic, explicit sexual molestation of a girl estimated to be 3 years old. Los Angeles T'~nes,/uly 9, 1993, page A1. - Garden Grove, CA - A complaint filed alleged that foster parents turned their home inw a hostel for child sexual abuse wha-~ children were sexually abused and used in pornographic movies. Orange County Register, May 29, 1993, page Metro 4. - Garden Grove, CA -'Man arrested on charges of having made lewd videos of young children, mostly ages 9 - 12, in his home and during phow shows at Cypress College. The tapes were sold through his company, Pleasure Time Videos. Modesto Bee, May 27, 1993 - A 51 year-old computer consultant is accused in a 17 count indictment of kidnapping, lewd and lascivious conduct with children ages 7 to 10 and production of videotapes, some of which depict him molesting the children. Orange County Regist~, May 4, 1993, page 1. - Orange, CA - A 12 year old girl, who was used to satisfy the sexual perversions of a couple who videotaped it all, died at age 26 afar a life of drug abuse and work as a "pore' star. * U.P.L Wire Service, April 22, 1993. - Los Angeles and Orange Counties - Four men arrested in a child pore ring. Photos of girls as young as 3 years old were found. Los Angeles Times, April 20, 1993, page B1. - Midway City, CA - Orange County Sheriff's Deputies arrested a 30 year old Midway City man who they alleged moleswxi a 10-year old neighbor and recorded the aas on a video camera. San Bernardino Sun, April 2, 1993. - San Bemartlino County, CA. - A retired California Highway Patrol Captain was arrested for offering child pore in exchange for sex with two girls, ages 9 and 11. A search produced between 600-800 videos and thousands of photographs of child pornography. Miarni U.P.I. Wire Service, March 4, 1993. - Search wan'ants for a computefizexl child pornography ring were served in 30 cities in the United States including s~,en California cities...Westminst~, Los Angeles, Los Gaws, Petalurea, Lakeside, Moreno Valley and San Francisco. "The thing that is so uoubling about this hi-tech child porn is that it can be endlessly duplicated, endlessly sold, and the child involved is endlessly victimized," said Customs spokesman, Michael Sheehan. * L.A. Daily Jounml, February 8, 1993, page 3. Santa Barbara, CA - Tapes were found of an uncle's 3 year sex torture of his niece. The abuse began when the niece was 13 years old. The evidence was discovered among his X-rated video collection. 10/",5/93 This may be reprin~d in its original form - without charge and 1mot written approval. SATURDAY :JULY31, 2993 My Vi, ew/Guest Column to bE on clnLd pomograY-.V ~ ~ssst lalme prison ~ for %hese exploners of snni~r w i~ have been upheld by ~,~nsi,m-~ our ch~ If Mr. Ro~e~ ever publXshes a po- Tnue champs would have made ]jucad thesaurns. lne xerms 'oog CalLlorma law consm~en~ wi~ the az~ pony snow."smoke az~ nut- federa/Law and rue laws of many ton,' au~ 'polir. ical anyel amd de- omer raw. s. cepz;i~' have ~ be ~ as s.vnonvms. In ~iifornia the~ are more than 60,000 conwcmd sex oftend- en, 79 penant of wnnm molested crimes ax~ recorded cn ~im or vide-~ ompe- This is whs~ child pornogra- phy is -- a crime scene pn~ntn'aph- In Califorma. lhe pos- sumon of chikl pornoiTaphy is pureshed as a ,-,-demeanor of- iense bm nnly Lf the child depicted isunder --i~-.e--or' nfensa. CeruinJy. we Calfformans value our children more Tinart tkn.~ Zu adaiuon. the bill would have opez~ California's se~ offender ~[L,,,sn'aUon z~conis ',o nons that work primarily wnh plo.vees or volunmen who would smnnec~U~selswsmanvotherway. The bill as =,---~-y was t~.~,~i--- ~n ~ ,7. The cam* ~v, ee Was .nmsed or five ersls _,rid two BEp'h~iP"n% ~ iS ;,,-~-ed by Democrat Bob E pie of l:L-.pub~.---= snppon~ ~n~ bilk now. One of Mx. ~pple's w~or~ him w mou=e about hi~ sinon m'x AB92~ .'1~. Eppie w~.r~ the U.S Supreme Coun- AB17 reFulaw-s "material hann- public news tacit. h. adult supen'i~Xon of newsracks winch eop,~in ~ max~x'~zd and which are ioeav~l within 2,50 tset of s school As you can see, it is about as effec- tive s$ m~ mental capan~ of the pnxium's of me man. ~nnt rocket menU.~, bin, ~n you don~ have w be to f~,ure out ti~tt if you locate v~r newsrack 250 or ~ad pornography have enu~j.v dif- ieren~ defimnons m the law. tlasi- for adu~s w puren&se Dm non. 1~ focuses nn wh~n~r eipi~n~ of ~ ~ is a minnr. Child pomo~alm.y foeu.~a on wixe~er me p~rson ~epxca~ m me · Because nnly one of ~ er-u lad the ~olinel sumaeh vot~ no, v;ney failed w ~ I~willnere, hun~mmesan~mm- :: ~ April, a Te/:i.Ted California leuer of response: -- H~ghwa Pam~l eap,-i,~ was at- '~ ~id not vo~e on AB927 benuse rested ~Y me .c,.~, Bernardino " .I had previously supponsd AZI17 ~ County sneri~s depamnen~ for of- which provided for the m~vimu/n 1 fenng ch:dd pornography m return control' (alloweg by the Supreme for sex with xwo girls, 9 and 1L A Court} of child pornography. ', ~ Of ~ hozne produced hun- WhexJner we like it or not, ~hi" ~ ~f yon want W provide be~er sue has b~n defined by the u- x~t~nu for CaliXornia's chil~ ~,' dn'sds of videoups and tk~us&uds S ~ .the aqe ~ ~ engaged m sex acr. s role is i,--,u,t by courL dec~sioz~ despicable scr. s on film or vide- ; w~ others. TUe Supreme Court wi3J utti- or. apes. born those who use these i; ~ J.f cauvic't~, he could face a mateiv determine what ieE4=l~Uon crime scene pJ~tograp~s r,o 1,p--i~um one-vearjail s-n,~pce Or is con~P/tion~ 8n~l beheve that other ~ ~ T. In~se ~ m ' a free of SLS00'. or bor. t~ for nsses- ABI~ wi~ wir, hsmnd ~neix scruUny them w b~an~2nail d~iid~en, and r. sion d child pornography. ~ A,-i- and AB 927 ~ n~t." from ~hose who furdn~ n-ploi~ -~ oz~, he jould have received 12 w Epple's rsponse q,,,,li6es fo~ in- these vi:nmized children bv ?= 22yursinpristmforeaehpieeeof dusmninlheabovesmngofpoliti- mere posse,~on nf these " eal synonym& ~raphs and mpe~, you nesd · : pornoEraphy.. w the · t · d~i/aren. ~ ~alue theix AB17 h2s BOthin" wha?~Boevel' ~ fflake VOU l:~S dO with ~ moWntphy, and Ca.l.ifo/nia :,- t~ h · AB927, The Senreally Exploi d Mx. Zpple sh~n~ know that. Ris Then, you must hold them ?. : Chikiren's An. w~uld have co-,-~i,_t~ confiucted the eanng cmmt. sble. " s~rengthened Calfforma's child on ABI? as wall His conclusion Jasct LaRue irsesior cousul ~. porno phv laws by ~g the fna~ AB927 is no~ consti~ur. ional is the National Law Cev,er.ior -- age o~r~ iffecugl chilaren w un- ludicrous. asd Familiu...~e is ~c asuwr of " tier 18 an~ wou/d haw made ~e Child pornography has no cons~ AB927. WE SUPPORT AB927 Please add our name in support of AB927 - "THE SEXUALLY EXPLOITED CHn-DREN'S ACT'. We want to join with other citizens from various backgrounds, pwfessions, churches, political affiliations and other orgsni,qtions throughout California supporting this Bill, which will strengthen the current California hw to more adeqtuttely proltct our children from sexual exploitation. I understand that my name will be listed with other citizens in support of the above- stated Bill and this does not commit us to involvement in any activities or projects unless we give prior consent. Organization Signature Date Phone number Please mail to: Natonal Law Center for Children and Families 1221 E. Dyer Rd., Ste. 220 Santa Ana, CA 92705 This may be reprinted in its original form - without charge and prior written approval. ITEM NO. 11 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager /r~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer January 11, 1994 Completion and Acceptance of the Jefferson Avenue Storm Drain Improvements at Winchester Road, Project No. PW93-01 PREPARED BY: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept the Jefferson Avenue Storm Drain Improvements at Winchester Road, Project No. PW93-01, as complete and direct the City Clerk to: File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract, and Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: On September 14, 1993, the City Council awarded a contract for the Jefferson Avenue Storm Drain Improvements, Project No. PW93-01, to Accurate Construction Inc. for $61,084.55. The project included installation of underground storm drain pipes to convey water across the east side of the Jefferson/Winchester intersection to reduce the flooding during storm periods. And removal of the existing concrete cross gutter to provide a smoother transition across Jefferson Avenue. The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The construction retention for this project will be released thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded. pwO4%agdfpt%94V)111%pw93-01 .ao~ 1228 FISCAL IMPACT: ---, The contract amount for this project was ;61,084.55 with e contingency of ;6,108.46. The total cost of the project will increase due to a change in the final bid quantities of $4,308.00, bringing the total project cost to ;65,392.55. This project is · Capital Improvement Project and is being funded from Measure A. Attachment: Notice of Completion Maintenance Bond pwO4~mgdrpt%94%0111%pw93-01 .ace 1228 RECORDING REQUES s eu BY AND RETURN TO: CITYCI.BII( CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 bineee Peek I)vive Terneerie, CA 92590 IPACE ABOVE THII LINE FOR RECORDER'I USE NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. 3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to Accurate Construction Inc. to perform the following work of improvement: PW93-01 Storm Drain on Jefferson Avenue at Wincheater Road. 4. Said work was completed by Mid company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the Cit~ of Temecula at a regular meeting Thereof held on January 11, 1994. That upon said contract the CBIC Contractors Bonding and Insurance Company was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT PW 92-12. 6. The street address of said property is: INTERSECTION OF JEFFERSON AVENUE AND WINCHESTER ROAD. Dated at Temecula, California, this _ day of · 1994. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA SS JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of pedury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. Dated at Temecula, California, this day of · 1994. JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk Fonm/CIP-O01 Rt, v. 12-5-91 pwO4%pwO3-O1%oompletn.not 121393 REC'E!'VED' JAN - 5 1994 CITfOFT~,,.. CULA ENGINEERING DEPARTTMENT CITY OF TEMECULA. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BOND NO. CA 7484 M PREMIUM:INCLUDED MNNTENANCE BOND PROJECT NO, PWe).01 JERtFRION A~ STORM DIMav #" .,jVEMENTS A T illVCil,,$taw ROAD KNOW ALL MEN BY TH!IE PRr~ENTE THAT; ACCURATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. 3.732 "D" CERRITOS AVE., LOS N4ME ~RI) ADDRESS OF CON/~ C/OR ALAMITOS, CA 90720 CALIFO_RNIA CORPORATION . heroinafter caned Pdncil, d. and .. CgNTRACTORS BONDING AND INSURANCE COMPANY, 23172 LAGUNA HILLS, CA 92653 NAMEAI~AD~(~~ PLAZA POINTE DRIVE NO. 185 herOinafter Galled SURETY. are Mid end firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA, hare~nalter callad OWI~R, in the ensl sum of _ S IX THOUSAND O_NE HUNDRED E~G.H~ 'AND, 4 ~ / 100' S ~ (41 6,108.4~ ) In lawfd money of the United STate, for tile eyelint a which sum we41 end Truly to be made. we bind ourselves. successors and assigns, ]olrkly and severely, firmly by them presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Prlndpal entered into I cedein Conyact with the OWNER, dsted the 14TH day el SEPTEMBER., 19 9~ a copy Of which is hereto attached end made a pert hereof lot the cemltructlon of PROJICT NO. PW)3-O¶ ~ WHIREAt. said CoatraGS provtdee that tim Pdn~tpel wRt furnish a bond condltjoned to gu~J entee for the pedal el ~ year altar epixovel ef the final estimate on said job. by the OWNER, Niainst all defects in workrnansfdp and mrlels which may becme ellarent dudrig said perit~; end WHEFIEA$. the laid Contract has brain completed, and was epproved on lg 9_J_4, JANUARY llTH NOW, THEREORE, THE CONDITION OF TFII OBUOATION iS SUCH, dot if within ore y If the date of approval of the maid Coatroot, the work done under the tams of eekf ConlTiot disclose poor w,xkmlrlhip In the exlcutlon of said work. and the carrying OUt Of the terms of said Contract, or It sisal appeal mm defeatire materials were furnished thereunder, then this o!~ligetion shall reme|n in full fmoe end vIFtue, otherwin this instrument shall bo void. ~igr~d and aeaJed this 30TIt day of DECEMBER . lg 93. CONTRACTORS BONDING AND INSURANCE COMPANY LINDA D. COATS ATTORNEY IN FACT Fritiei" " ACCURATE CONSTRUCTION, II'C · PRINCIPAL [Fl~le) APFROViD A9 TO FORM: By:. Sco~ F; ~eld, City Attorney ~Name) MAINTENANCE BOND ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of CALIFORNIA Count~ of LOS ANGELES On 12/30/93before me, Date personally appeared CHRISTOPHER J. COATS, NOTARY PUBLIC , Name, Title o! ORicer - e.I. 'jane Doe, Notary Public* LINDA D. COATS , Nome(s) o/SiSm~s) [] personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed [] to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/ [] her/their authorized capaclty(les), and that by GOMM. ~9694~rso~) acted, executed the Instrument. Al"l'Elq'flON NOTARY: Althoulh the inlormation requested below Is OPllON~L, it could p~event fraudulent attachment of this ce~i~cate to unautho~v. ed documents. THIS CERTIFICATE MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Title or Type of Document Number of Pages Date of Document OPTIONAL SECTION CAPACITY CLAIMED BY 51GNEI~--- [] Individual(s) [] Corporate Officer(s) Titus} Partner(s) Attorney-in-Fact Other: MscALPA,OI-CAI22892 ii~ihm~alWedami.~mmlmpmmmmmimmmy. im. lmdtimCmm~HDA D. COATS betd~dtheCan~nv~he~eauf~ybe~d~wk~hm~e~inmtetimebe~p~e~edby~t~d~i~T~i~mm~~m~ cseddbmseameybeappreeed by;kL, 1'kiwibrbemTWeL ieiiadg)RMINlRwtbeteect~FmeedNtemeymueteelketklleelmdi~deempllemdtlwlxedlo~ lepptie~,lke Nme dtim ldncipd, bmme dlhe eWig~lhe pead smn, Uie RLTkielmgeraTbid;aedmmy edlodktbe~NrJitalioeer. l eemetdeddinlmimeeeemmmleleml, iramr. BafbafahiddNmsne;eumyimidar4efadedbewdiee;fimeNical~epirdiee ddelobeckedlfadfedhinmymfilmnFewwdNtefmey. ~r~mmW~mmdempm~mmm~e~m~mdmmmmmmbmmd(Lm..~mmm~mm~mi~mkmb~mbem~mm~em;mmm~$~'2ii~"~mbemdim~m~W~i (b)~hePee~sum~mm~/kedmtgumMeedbythe~md~eimees/ad~d~abd~:"x(o~kert~mnm~~m~Mm(q~m~~m~W~ ~iB~JJ~F~iR~b~emb~wermmed~bmme~mm.~Ktim~mmtedpeeermndmd~mii~oemaeed~m~d~i~i~n~~q~e~ immnmmmmmmte~mmm~mm~mmmmmmmmm/m~m~ii~i~m~m~mmimmmmmm`e~dmm~ramL~d~~~~~b~i~~h~ m~lDe~mmtlmdemcqmbe~mndmmemmldNklibDmmimmmmmmlmmle~WmmmlmfimimtkePmmm~d~ Fei~i.~)RIItfiilllmllmeulkmdledlmleeemv oi lke Cmmmpemy to erfl/ em mm~jly med elel;fmmmmm d l~ foregaieg mmetmm mm m enV Linmiml ~ m #llm'r,m~ im dek9aiedtetke~eg~metmeem~amimmbmmedm~d~m~o~iem~tebiedt~mCeqmmmyd~~m~e~d~eqm~mi~b Sec~Ny dtke C4mpeny: R.L Tk id, Bedim TliW or Atom Creel. ~ ~ Ihet IIm akjnatmel (indudikJ cedfiialme Iket lie Pele~ d ACeriley ia atdl in lorc8 end dlacq d R.L. Tkm or kebefe fkieL. end Nolely Pub/it, and l~e hq~ e lNamie9 ef~ lay Li~llid Poser oi AIofaef cmlleinm9 fkb iald the folegei~g readulionm ee wel me tke Litneed Power d Alof~ey lead~ e endl ee ib Iren~mb~m, fay be tm;mimile; reed muc, h I. inded Ibeer d Altmnm/mMII be dmmmmd en minireel in ell elmilL ~ t~RIIB! fief eli mmoklmna im4opled peer ~ !odly appmml ag Ike mbee nemea ime ellN~e),-i n4ecl lm !he G~lllleey We e euperaede(I. e~xed R,L. Thiel 8TATE OF CALiFORNiA -- COUNTY OF ORANGE (~NTRACIT3R8 BONDING AND INSURANCE CIX41aAN*t' On ) / 0 4 / (:) 3 ~bmi~re mm,vdemm~m zMm9e~m~'idmyFim~dic mandim ttmi~mtm~fCd~mrei~Cmmm~yd~pa~LT~m~mT~k~mi~ IheperaemmwlloseilmmafeambacfbedlotkewilhimLimiledFeeef~Atkmnef~kk~i~ Jlofaet~dtheymlldlheaemeiltfleiaudlmizedmqal;lmmendU~by~eir~i Lniad Pomr d Al~'ney CBiCeaecsad tim Lmmded l~eeer el Ata~aey. · ITEM NO. 12 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVA~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. $erlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer January 11, 1994 Contract Amendment No. 1 for Professional Surveying and Geotechnical Services for the Ynez Road Widening Project, PW92-05, CFD 88-12 PREPARED BY: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Contract Amendment No. 1 for additional Professional Services for the Ynez Road Widening Project, PW92-05 for the following professional services: Professional Surveying Services by JFD Associates, Inc. in an amount not to exceed 920,033.50 e Professional Geotechnical Services by Law/Crandall, Inc. in an amount not to exceed 96,586.00 DISCUSSION: During the construction of the Ynez Road Widening Project additional professional services were required for the following: Survevino and Staking: Additional surveying services were required as a result of changes to the contract during the construction of the road improvements including revisions to the storm drain line "A" and "D", extension of the median curb, location of revised handicap ramps, additional driveways locations, curb grade and centerline staking for excavation of the widen portions to establish the proposed subgrade, for a total of 919,283.50. Surveying for extra work items include staking for the clearing operation and rough grading along the south side of Solana Way, for a total of ~750.00. A total of $2,910.00 will be deducted from the contractor's last progress payment for re-staking various locations where staking was removed by the contractor's construction. SUBTOTAL $20,033.50 Soil Testino: Additional field test for the removals of unsuitable material were required in various areas including south of $olana Way, north of Empire Creek, south of Motor Car Parkway, north of Rsncho California Road and for the rough grading on the south side of Solana Way. SUBTOTAL $6,586.00 FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of the additional surveying and staking in the amount of ~20,033.50, geotechnical services in the amount of $6,586.00, for · total of $26,619.50 to provide professional services. Funds are available from Community Facilities District 88-12. pwO4%egdfpt%94%0111%amenynez.no1 1229 AMEND~ NO. 1 LF. Davidson Associates, Inc. Ynez Road Widening Proj~ PURCHASE ORDER NO. 13824 The Agreement dated March 23, 1993 between the City of Temecula, and LF. Davidson Associate, .Inc. (herein referred to as * Agreement*) is hereby amended as follows: Professional Land Surveying Services for Ynez Road Widening, Project No. PW92-05 RE: Professional Land Surveying Services Ynez Road Widening Project Section 1 I. The scope of services as listed in exhibit "A" of the "Agreement' will remain unchanged. Section 2 Compensation for services shall be total of all services described in this Amendment and shall not exceed twenty thousand and thirty-three Dohrs and fifty cents All above costs are eligible for funding through Community Facilities District 88-12. The total cost of this element of the pwject is summarized below: Original Contract Amount $ 54,187.00 Proposed Amendment No. 1 $ 90.033.50 Total Contract Amount $ 74.220.50 Section 3 All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same. The parlies hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above written. B,y: ~ ~ , /~t//~ / ,..., APPROVBD AS TO FORM: By: CITY OF TEMECULA Scott F. Field, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk AMENDMENT NO. 1 Law/Cnmdall, Inc. Ynez Road Widening Project PURCHASE ORDER NO. 13823 The Agreement dated March 23, 1993 between the City of Temecula, and Law/Crandall, Inc. (herein refen'ed to as * Agreement") is hereby amended as follows: Professional Geotechnical Services for Ynez Road Widening, Project No. PW92-05 RE: Professional Geotechnical Services Ynez Road Widening Project Section 1 I. The scope of services as listed in exhibit "A" of the "Agreement" will remain unchanged. Section 2 Compensation for services shall be total of all services described in this Amendment and shall not exceed six thousand and five hundred and eighty-six Dollars and no cents ($6,586.00). All above costs are eligible for funding through Community Facilities District 88-12. The total cost of this element of the project is summarized below: Original Contract Amount $ 31,400.00 Proposed Amendment No. 1 $ 6.586.00 Total Contract Amount $ 37.986.00 Section 3 All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same. The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above written. CONSULTANT CITY OF TEMEC~A By: Steven J. Ford By: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Scott F. Field, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk ITEM NO. 13 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer January 11, 1994 Contract Change Orders No. 36 through No. '40 for Ynez Road Widening Project, PW92-05, CFD 88-12 PREPARED BY: ~-a,Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Contract Change Order No. 36 through No. 40 for Ynez Road Widening Project, PW92-05 for labor and equipment for various items of work, in the amount of $12,711.68. BACKGROUND: During the construction of the Ynez Road Widening Project the following items of work have resulted in a change to the contract: CHANGE ORDER NO. 36 Provide four panels for the illuminated street name signs at the Town Center entrance to revise the street name lettering. SUBTOTAL: $634.20 CHANGF ORDER NO. 37 Remove a 1" PVC conduit for the existing parking lot lights in front of the Acura Dealership and relocate it behind the new sidewalk. SUBTOTAL: $823.23 pwO4~gdfpt~931,0111%pw92..05 122793 CHANGF ORDI=RNO. 38 Contract change order number 27 directed the contractor to install new electrical conduits and wiring for the auto dealership perking lot lighting for an estimated cost of $3,180.00 The actual installation cost is $4,248.20, for · different of $1,068.20. SUBTOTAL: $1,068.20 CHANGE ORDER NO. 39 Remove additional debris material that accumulated on the site, prior to and during construction to an approved disposal site. SUBTOTAL: $4.213.74 CHANGE ORDER NO. 40 During. the placement of the Line "D" storm drain pipe an additional 32 feet of 48" RCP pipe was required. This additional length of pipe allowed for the storm drain outlet to extend past the new slope embankment. The actual cost to extend Line "D" storm drain an additional 32 feet of 48" RCP pipe and install a head wall was $7,427.37 minus an amount provided for in contract change order no. 35 ($1,455.06) for · balance of $5,972.31. SUBTOTAL: $5,972.31 TOTAL: $12,711.68 FISCAL IMPACT: On January 26, 1993, the City Council awarded a contract for the construction of Ynez Road Widening from Rancho California Road to Palm Plaza, to Vance Corporation for $2,612,811.29. Contract Change Order No.'s 01 through 35 were approvad for a total amount of $448,614.04. Contract Change Order No.'s 36 through No. 40 are in the amount of $12,711.68. Therefore, an additional $12,711.68 must be appropriated for the Ynez Road Widening Project from CFD 88-12. There are adequate funds available in the CFD 88-12 construction account. Attachments: Contract Amendments pwO4%egd~pt%93%0111~w92-05 122793 City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive · Ternecula, California 92590 (909) 694-1989 ° FAX (909) 694-1999 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 036 CONTRACT NO. PW92-05 PROJECT: Ynez Road Widen,no - CFD 88-1 SHEET 1. of _1_ TO CONTRACTOR: Vance Coreoration NOTE: This change order is not effective until aooroved by the Enaineer THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR: An INCREASE in the following item: Provide four panels for the illuminated ~treet name dgne at the Town Center entrance to revise the street name lettering. TOTAL: $634.20 Original Contract Amount: ................................... Adjusted Contract Amount: ................................... Change Order No. 036 ....................................... Total Contract Amount: ..................................... 2,612,811.29 3,061,425.33 $ 634.20 3,062,059.53 Adjustment of Working Days: ................................. O Approved: Principal Engineer By: z~~ y, Date: all services necessary for the work above specified. and will accept as full payment therefore the prices °hewn above. Dated Accepted: Contractor: (company's ~;me) (signatu ) Name: L (~ - - (print) If the contractor doe° not eign acceptance to thie order. hie attention ie dire~ed to the requirement° of ~e apeelf,oat, one ee to proceeding with the ordered work end filing · written proteat within the time therein specified. pwO4%cip%projecte%pw92-OS%cco%oeo36.e;o 010394 City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590 1909l 694-1989 · FAX {9091 69 9 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 037 CONTRACT NO. PW92-05 PROJECT: Ynez Road Widenine - CFD 88-1 ~ SHEET 1__ of .j.. TO CONTRACTOR: Vance Corporation NOTE: This chanue order is not effective until aDDroved by the Engineer THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR: An INCREASE in the following item: AS Remove a 1" PVC conduit for the existing paring lot lights in from of the Acura Dealership and relocate it behind the new sidewalk. TOTAL: $823.23 Original Contract Amount: .................................... Adjusted Contract Amount: ................................... Change Order No. 037 ....................................... Total Contract Amount: ..................................... 2,612,811.29 3,062,059.53 $ 823~-I 3,062,88; Adjustment of Working Days: ................................. Approve.: Principal Engineer By: ~t-_/)~~ Date:/- all seaices necessaw for the wo~ above specified. end ill ~cept M full payment letafore ~e prices ehown above. Dated Accepted: Contractor: (com~me) Name: (print) If the contractor does not sign acceptance to thie order, hie attention i$ directed to the requiremente of the specifications to proceeding with the ordered work end filing · written protect within the tim therein epecifiecl. pwO4%dp~wojects%pw12-OS~ce%cco37.cco 010394 City of Temecula '43174 Business Park Drive · Ternecula, California 92590 (9091 694-1989 · FAX (9C)9) 694-1999 CONTRACT CHANGE= ORDER NO., 038 CONTRACT NO. PW92-05 PROJECT: Ynez Road Widening - CFD 88-1 SHEET I of 1__ TO CONTRACTOR: Vance Corooration NOTE: This chanoe order is not effective until aooroved by the Eneineer THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR: An INCREASE in the following item: Contract change order number 27 directed the contractor to install new electrical conduits and wiring for the auto dealership paring lot lighting for an erdmated cost of 13,180.00. The actual installation cost is 14,248.20, for a different of 11,068.20. TOTAL: 11,068.20 Original Contract Amount: ................................... Adjusted Contract Amount: ................................... Change Order No. 038 ....................................... Total Contract Amount: ..................................... 2,612,811.29 3,062,882.76 1,068.20 3,063,950.96 Adjustment of Working Days: ................................. 0 Approved: Principal Engineer By: Date:/- ~f -~ We the unclereigned contractor have given careful conel ratio o the change propoeed eP~l hereby agree. ;~thie propoaal is epproved, that we will provide all equipm~'areful c~: i:, l,the~ey otherwiee be noted above, and perform all services neceeeery for the work above epecified, end will accept aa full payment therefore the price ehown above. Dated Accepted: Contractor: (comp n~'s name) By: .,~ ~c,- Title: L.~(signature) Name: ~" - ~,v~c (~ (print) If the contractor doee not eign acceptance to thie order, hi attention ie directed to the requirernente of the epecificatione ee to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written protect within the time therein apetitled. pwO4%oip%projecte%pw92-O5%cco%oco38.cco 010394 City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive · Ternecula, California 92590 (909) 694-1989 · FAX (909) 69,,/9 PROJECT: TO CONTRACTOR: NOTE: CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 039 CONTRACT NO. PW92-05 Ynez Road Widenino - CFn 88-12 Vance Corporation This chanae order is not effective until anDroved by the Enoineer THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR: An INCREASE in the following item: Remove additional debris materld that accumulated on the site, prior to construction to an approved disposal site. Original Contract Amount: ................................... Adjusted Contract Amount: ................................... Change Order No. 039 ....................................... Total Contract Amount: ..................................... Adjustment of Working Days: ................................. SHEET I of 1 and dudng TOTAL: $4,213.74 $ 2,612,811.29 $ 3,063,950 ~ $ 4,213 $ 3,068,164.70 0 Approved: Principal Engineer By: Date://-"~- all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept es full payment therefore the prices shown above. Dated Accepted: Name: . (print) Contractor: Title: If the contractor does not sign acceptance to this order, hie attention ie directed to the requirements of the specifications es to proceeding with the ordered work and filing · written protest within the time therein specified, pwO4%cip%projects%pw12-OS~cco%cco39.cce 010394 City of Temecula I43174 Business Park Drive · Ternecula, California 92590 (909) 694-1989 · FAX (909) 694-1999 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 040 CONTRACT NO. PW92-05 PROJECT: Ynez Road Widening - CFD 88-12 SHEET _!_ of _!_ TO CONTRACTOR: Vance CorPoration NOTE: This change order is not effective until aDoroved by the EnD,near THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR: An INCREASE in the following item: During the placement of the Line "D' ~torm drain pipe an additionai 32 feet of 48" RCP pipe was required. This additional length of pipe allowed for the storm drain outlet to extend past the new slope embankment. The actual cost to extend Une "D' storm drain an additional 32 feet of 48" RCP pipe and install a head wall was $7.427.37 minus an amount prodded for in contract change order no. 35 ($1,455.06) for a balance of $5,972.31. TOTAL: 15,972.31 Original Contract Amount: ................................... Adjusted Contract Amount: ................................... Change Order No. 040 ....................................... Total Contract Amount: ..................................... 2,612,811.29 3,068,164.70 5,972.31 3,074,137.01 Adjustment of Working Days: ................................. Q is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all m~; otherwise be noted above, and perform ell services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept a~ full payment therefore the prices shown above. Dated Accepted: t/~A~ Contractor: (compan~'~Zs name) / (signature) Name: ~.~ (print) If the contractor does not sign acceptance to this order, to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written protest within the time therein specified. pwO4%dp~,orcjects%pwg2-OS~cso~,P,~o40.cco 010394 ITEM NO. 14 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVA CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning January 11, 1994 Fifth Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement Creating the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency to Allow Compensation of 9100.00 for Board Meeting Attendance PREPARED BY: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: Approve the attached amendment to Section 3.6 of the Joint Powers Agreement Creating the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency (the "Agreement") and Authorize the Mayor to sign the amended Agreement. BACKGROUND: In 1990, the City of Temecula became a member of the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency (RCHCA) Joint Powers Authority (JPA). The RCHCA is the organization responsible for implementing the Section 10(a) Permit and the Short-Term Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) for the Stephens Kangaroo Rat (SKR). The HCP is administered through an Agency Agreement with the California Department of Fish and Game (DF&G) and a Section 10(a) Permit from the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. DISCUSSION: The proposed amendment to the Agreement entitles members of the Board and their alternates to receive compensation in the amount of 9100.00 for the attendance at and participation in regular and special meetings of the RCHCA Board. Currently, the Agreement precludes Board members from receiving compensation for attendance at RCHCA Board meetings. FISCAL IMPACT: None. A'I'I'ACHMENT: Fifth Amendment to Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency - Page R:\S~STA~~f.AGR 12/17193 1j$ 1 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION AGENCY R:~S~STAFFRPT~JPAMBIqDS.AGR 12/17/93 YZF'LI ~ TO U'OZIT O:F IlKNFER. I Ir~Ewl,Bli'E CiF, ZL'Z'ZNG THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT TO ~OINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION AGENCY Amendments) is made by and between THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE, THE CITY OF HEMET, THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, THE CITY OF MORENO V~xr.ts~y, THE CITY OF PEItRIS, THE CITY OF TEMECULA, and THX CITY OF CORONA (collect4vely referred to as the sPaz~ciess or the sMsmbsr Agenciess). I~RCTTAT.-q WHEREAS, THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ~ CITY OF HEMET, THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, THE CITY OF MORENO V~T.T.~y, ~ CITY OF PERRIS and THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE entered into that certain agreement entitled ~oint Exercise Of Powers A~reement Creating Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency (the sA~emmmnts); and WHEREAS, the First Amendment To ~roint Exercise Of Powers Agreement Creating Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency made THE CITY OF TEMECULA a par~y to the Agreement; 'and WHEKF~, the Third Amendment To ~oint Exercise Of Powers A~reement Creating Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency made THE CITY OF CORONA a par~y to the A~reemtnt; and WHEREAS, the Member Agencies desire to further amend the A~reement as follows. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties a~ree as follows: 1. The last sentence of the last paragraph of Section 3 sBoard of Directors' is hereby deleted end replaced by the following: DEO& 1725: 9/'50/93 'Members of the Board and their alternates shall be entitled to compensation in the amount of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) per meeting for attendance at end participation in regular and special meetings of the Board. Except as hereinabove expressly provided, members of the Board and their alternates shall not be entitled to any other salary or compensation for attendance at or participation in meetings of the Board or for any similar services rendered on behalf of the Agency. m 2. The terms and conditions of the Agreement not expressly amended by this Fifth Amendment shall continue in full force and effect. 3. This Fifth Amendment shall become effective on the date that execution of this Fifth Amendment is authorized by the last of the governing bodies of the Member Agencies. · IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Fifth Amendment as of the date last set forth below and agree to abide by its ~erms from that date forward. Dated: Attest: Clerk of the Board Dated: Attest: City Clerk (Signature page continued) COUFL~OFBZVIBBZDI By: Chairman, Board of Supervisors CITY OF RZVIBSZDI By: Mayor DEOG1725:9/50/93 --2 -- Dated: Attest: City Clerk Dated: Attest: City Clerk Dated: Attest: City Clerk Dated: Attest: City Clerk Dated: Attest: City Clerk Dated: Attest: City Clerk CZ'rZ' 01 HIMaT By: Mayor CITY 01 Z.,,llkZl IZJZIO. BI Mayor Mayor CITY OF PSiall Mayor CZTq&OF T~l~'Ula Mayor CITY OF COB2Ma Mayor DEC~1725:9/'50/93 --3 -- ITEM NO. 15 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council City Clerk January 11, 1994 Records Destruction Approval RECOMMENDATION: Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of Temecula a!~proved Records Retention Policy. BACKGROUND: On March 22, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution No. 92-17 which authorizes the destruction of certain city records which have become outdated, obsolete or are excess documents, in compliance with Sections 34090 through 34090.7 of the Government Code. The records management program, administered by the City Clerk's Office, is in the process of microfilming all inactive records that are over two (2) years old. The attached exhibit details plot plans for the years 1974 through 1988 which have been copied to microfilm. Three microfilm copies have been prepared, one to be kept in the Planning Department, one in the City Clerk's records vault and one in permanent off-site storage. The City Attorney has reviewed this request and has signed Exhibit "1" of the Annual Review as provided for in Resolution No. 92-17. ATTACHMENTS: JSG Destruction of Records Request Resolution No. 92-17 Exhibit "1" (Executed by City Attorney) RESOLUTION NO. 92-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN CITY RECORDS AS PROVIDED BY SECTION 34090 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA WItEnd&S, the keeping of numerous records is not necessary after a certain period of time for the effective and efficient operation of the government of the City of Temecula; and WHERE&S, Section 34090 of the Government Code of the State of California provides a procedure whereby any City record which has served its purpose and is no longer required may be destroyed; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 34090, the City Attorney has reviewed and approved the Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy, attached hereto as Exhibit "1" and incorporated by reference herein; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL~ by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: SECTION 1. The records of the City of Temecula as set forth in groups on Schedule I, Which schedule is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, are hereby authorized to be destroyed as provided by Section 34090 of the Government Code of the State of California and in accordance with the provisions of said schedule upon the request of the department head and with the consent in writing of the City Attorney, without further action by the City Council of the City of Temecula. SECTION 2. The provisions of Section 1 above do not authorize the destruction of: a. Records affecting the title to real property or liens thereon b. Court records c. Records required to be kept by statute d. Records less than two (2) years old The minutes, ordinances, or resolutions of the City Council of the City of Temecula or of any City boards, committee or commission 31ssos 92-17 -1- SECTION 3. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 2, the duplicates of records not less than five (5) years old which are no longer required are hereby authorized to be destroyed as set forth in the attached Schedule A. SECTION 4. The destruction of any record as provided for herein shall be by burning, shredding or other effective method of destruction and said destruction shall be witnessed by the City Clerk or her designee. SECTION 5. The term *records° as used hercin shall include documents, instruments, books, microfilm or papers. PASSi~-r~, APPROVED AND ADOPTRD, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 24th of March, 1992. ATrF. ST: Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] 3/Ruo, 92-17 -2- STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMEC~ ) I, JUNE S. GI~I~-RK, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEI~I~.Ry DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 92-17 was duly adopted a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 24th day of March, 1992, by the following roll call vote; AYES: 5 COUNCIL~-~ERS: Birdsall, Moore, Lindemans, Mufioz Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None June S. Greek, City Clerk 3/Resos 92-17 -3- CITY OF TEMECULA DESTRUCTION OF OBSOLETE RECORDS POLICY A. PURPOSe. To provide the timely destruction of outdated, obsolete and excess documents and records which are of no use legally or otherwise to the various city departments, in compliance with Sections 34090 through 34090.7 of the Government Code. B. POI-ICY It shall be the policy of the City of Temecula that the City Clerk or her designee shall routinely destroy - by burning, shredding, erasure, or other permanent method of obliteration - outdated, obsolete and excess documents and records in accordance with the following procedures and subject to the following retention schedules. No record may be destroyed unless specified in this Policy. C. PROCEDURRq The City Clerk or her designee shall submit a written request for permission to destroy the documents, books, receipts, and other records (hereinafter "records") enumerated in this Policy when: 1. It is determined that the record is obsolete and of no further use to the department and the record is not needed for, or the subject of discovery of, pending claims or litigation involving the City. 2. It is determined that the record is eligible for destruction according to the following Records Retention Schedules and any other criteria for destruction have been complied with. 3. The City Clerk's office shall submit a written request for destruction to the department head listing the records to be destroyed, showing the age and type of record and the applicable retention schedule. 4. Destruction shall not occur until the department head, approves, in writing, the request for destruction after checking with the City Attorney, as necessary, to verify the document is not involved in a pending claim or litigation involving the City. The department head may deny the destruction of any record or condition the destruction on the prior microf~ming of the record in accordance with Section E of this policy. 3/1~,~o, 92-17 -4- 5. Once permission to destroy has been given, The City Clerk's office shall oversee and witness the destruction. When destruction has been completed, the date and manner of destruction and the attestation that the City Clerk or designee witnessed the destruction shall be listed on the request form. The request for destruction together with the written approval of the department head shall be maintained in a separate file kept by the City Clerk. 6. Disposal of any records, once destroyed as provided herein, may be made pursuant to any recycling program or policy of the City. D. RETi~.NTION SCH~.f~UI.Kq In compliance with Government Code Sections 340~0 and 34090.5, the following Records Retention Schedule (Schedule A) has been established to implement and maintain this Policy. E. VIDF. O AND AUDIO SCI-IF.r}U~ Duplicates of records, less than two years old may be destroyed, if no longer required, without micwfilming. Video and audio recording mediums are considered duplicate records if and when the City keeps another record such as written minutes of the event which is recorded. However, a video medium shall not be destroyed for a period of at least 5 years after the event recorded thereon. F. LITIGATION SCHEDULES These records must be kept for five (5) years or until such time as their relevance to, and need in pending litigation or claims against the City is resolved through settlement with prejudice or final court adjudication. 2. civil lawsuits. Written claims presented under the Government Tort Claims Liability Act. Records related to, or involved in, pending criminal investigations and actions or E. MICROFILMING Microfling, when authorized in this Policy, shall be performed in compliance with all of the following conditions: 3/Rs,os 92-17 1. The record, paper, or document is photographed, microphotographed, reproduced by electronically recorded video images on magnetic surfaces, recorded in the electronic data- processing system, recorded on optical disk, reproduced on film or any other medium which does not permit additions, deletions or changes to the original document, or reproduced on film, optical disk, or any other medium in compliance with the minimum standards or guidelines, or both, as recommended by the American National Standards Institute or the Association for Information and Image Management for recording of permanent records or nonpermanent records, whichever applies. 2. The device used to reproduce the record, paper, or document on film, optical disk, or any other medium is one which accurately and legibly reproduces the original thereof in all details and which does not permit additions, deletions or changes to the original document images. 3. The photographs, microphotographs or other reproductions on film, optical disk or any other medium are made as accessible for public reference as the original records were. 4. A true copy of archival quality of the film, optical disk, or any other medium reproductions shall be kept in a safe and separate place for security purposes. No page of any record, paper or document shall be destroyed in any page cannot be reproduced on film with full legibility. Every non-reproducible page shall be permanently preserved in a manner that will afford easy reference. ANNUAL REVIEW BY CITY ATTORNEY The City Clerk shall be responsible for requesting an annual review of this Policy by the City Attorney. This request shall be made through the City Manager. Pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 34090, I hereby give my consent to the destruction of records under the direction of the City Clerk pursuant to this Policy City Attorney Date: City of Temecula /--- 3/Resos 92-17 .Group :No. ·... III IV V Vl VII VIII IX X XI XII XIII Schedule A CITY OF TEMECULA RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE Records affecting time to real property or liens thereon Records required to be kept permanently by statute Minute, ordinances end resolutions of the City Council or Boards end Commissions. Documents with lasdng hietodal, administrative, legal, fieold, or eases'oh value. Records which do nut require permanent espies for store purposes Correspondence, operational reports end information upon which City policy has been established. Duplicates of V above, when retention is necessary for reference Records requiring retention for more then five years but no more than fifteen years by statute or administration value, Duplicates needed for administrative purposes for five - fifteen years. All other odginal City records, or instruments, books or papers that are considered public documents not included in Groups I through VIII Duplicates end other documents not public records required to be malnteined for administrative purposes. Duplicate records requiring retention for administrative purpose suoh as reference material for making up budgets, for planning, end programming. Reference files. (Copies of documents which duplicate the record copies filed elsewhere in the City; documents which require no action end ere non-record; rough drafts, notes, feeder reports, end similar working papers accumulated in preparation of a communication, study or other document, end cards, listings, indexes and other papers used for controlling work). X 2 P If Micro X 2 P If Micro X 2 P If Micro X 2 P If Micro X 4 X 2 10 X'. 2 X 2 13 4 yra. 12 2 15 Note: Any item san be destroyed if two copies of microfilm done with one in safe storage and accomplished properly. Destruction years only apply if not on film. Note: Any item not on microfilm and subject to destruction will not be destroyed without written permission of the department head end the City Attorney. Note: Regardless of Office Retention period as listed, eadier transfer to the Retrieves Center is authorized. X 2 13 15 X 2 1 3 Note: Original council minutes, ordinances, resolutions end official bonds will nut be destroyed even if microfilmed. X X 2 3 5 X 3 3 X 1 1 3/Resoe 92-17 -7- Continued... XIV XV XVI Transitory files, including letters of transmitTel (when nut · public record) suspense copies when reply has been received, routine requests for information end publication, tracer letters, feeder reports, end other duplicates copies no longer Original documents diopoeable upon occurrence of an eves or an a~tion (i.e., audit, job completion, completion of contract, ere.) or upon obsolescence, supersession, revocltion. Policy files end reference sets of publications. XVII Duplicates or non-record documents required for administrative needs but destroyable on occurrence of an event or an setion. X x X X 3 Indef Indef 3 ledef Indef 3 Note: Destroy upon supersession or obsolescence. 3,'Rems 92-17 ..8- DESCRIPTION OF PFRMANENT RECORDS Attachment to Schedule "A" Group I Records - Affecting Property Title or Liens Group I documents shall not be subject to destruction, except if micro filming or reproduction by other medium which does not permit additions, deletions or changes to the original document is performed in strict accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 34090.5. Building and Safety: Utilities: Deeds Parks: Building Permits Lights Signs Bikeways Capital Improvements: Water Curbs Landscaping Plans Power Gutters Right-of-way Drawings Cablevision Walks Weed Abatement Checks &Inspection Television Bikeways Striping Basements Maps: Drainage: Hou sing Street Names &Numbers Streets Flood Control General Plan: Liens Light Soil Erosion Amendments 'Condemnations Trees Hydrology Zoning Assessments Signals Parking Group H Group IH Group IV A. B C Group V Records Required to be kept by Statute Minutes, Ordinances and Resolutions of City Council or Boards and Commissior~' Announcements, Notices, Affidavits, Agendas, Minutes, Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations, Supporting Exhibits Documents with lasting administrative, legal, fiscal, historical or research value. Administrative - Personnel cumulative records, Reviews, Action, Promotions, Time Records, Leave, CETA, Policy and Procedures, OSHA Inspections, Affirmative Action Program, any like above. Fiscal - Audit - Annual and Semi-annual, Monthly Budget AHocations, Appropriations, Expenditures, Encumbrances, Journals and Ledgers, Inventory, Payroll, Receipts, Collections, Cash, Check Register, Capital Property, Business License, Fees, Schedules, Grants, Bonds, Trust Funds, Revenue Sharing, Treasurer's Register. Historical City Organization Charts, Service Organizations, Chamber of Commerce, Homeowners' Associations, City Flower/Tree, Teen Centers, Schools, Universities, Press Releases, Department Staff Summaries, Report and Statistical Analyses. Bicycle Licenses, Purchase orders and requisitions, Contracts or Agreements, despite a shorter term provided therein and Entertainment/Special Event Permits 3/Re, sos 92-17 TO: City Clerk FROM: Gail Zigler, Office Specialist DATE: December 22, 1993 SUBJECT: Destruction of Records Request Attached is e print out of Plot Plans (Retention Type PP) dating from 1974 through 1988. These records have been microfilmed in triplicate with a copy distributed to the City Clerk's Records Vault, the Planning Department and a copy to the Vault in San Diego. The following have reviewed and approved this destruction request. Pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 34090, I hereby give my consent to the destruction of records under the direction of the City Clerk pursuant to the City of Temecula's adopted Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy. Department Heed: City Attorney: Date Scott/F~/~m>df, yc Date R:%forms\destruct.rqe R~ESTY...RRQ61 City of Temmcutm Do¢. Ref ......... 161 hp 1 12/15/1993 D~truction Statul Listing Retention Type... ~ 16:15:~8 Detractlea Date. 12/30/1993 D~. Item Rat. FiLe Reference # Store Nedie Ref. Date R~. Brief D~cri~ion Type Security CLB~ Storage L~ation - Location Referf 161 03/1~/197~ 1678 PLot PLan ~ 000200011386 FiLm 3821N1AO001 GrQ4F i 161/12~The VauLt 161 ~/15/197~ 1717 PL~ PLan 1717 ~ 000300011397 FiLm 3821H1AO001 Gro~ i 161/12~The VauLt 161 05/1~197~ 1712 PLot PLan 1712 PP 000300011397 FiLm 3821H1AQO01 GroLF ! 161/12~The VauLt 161 11/08/197~ 178~ PLot PL~ 1788 ~ 000300011602 FILl 3821N1AOOO1 Group ! 161/l~/The VauLt 161 01/10/19~ 1~1 PLot PLan 1821 PP 000300011605 FiLm 3821H1AO001 Groqo i 161/120~he VauLt 161 ~/1~19~ 1682 PLot PLm ~ 0~200011391 FiLm 3821H1AOO01 Group I 161/1~/The VauLt 161 05/02/19~ 1~1 PLot PLan ff 0002000113~ FiLm 382INLAY01 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 10/2~/19~ 2117 PLot PLan 2117 PP 00030001¶~20 FiLm 3821H1AO001 Group ] 161/120/The VauLt 161 11/2A/19~ 2159 PLot Ptm 2159 ~ 000300011&~ FiLm 38~1N1AO~1 Group i 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 1~/1Z/19~ Zl~ PLot PLan Zl~ ~ 0003000116Z6 FILm 38Z1M1AO001 GPoup i 161/12~The VauLt 161 05/~5/1976 1~7 PLot PL~ 1~ PP 00030~11~ F~Lm 3821~1A~01 Group ] 161/1ZO/The VauLt 161 06/1~19~ Z619 PLot PLan ~19 PP 000300011631 FiLm 387.1~1A0001 Group ] 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 0~28/19~ 2~99 PLot Pt~ ~ PP 00~00011~33 Fi[m 3821H1A~01 Group ] 161/120/The VauLt 161 ~/2~/19~ 2538 PLot PL~ 2538 PP 00~00011~7 FiLm 3821HIAO001 Group ] 161/120/The VauLt 161 09/~/19~ 25~ PLot PLan 2582 PP 000300011~46 FiLe 382INLAY01 Group ] 161/120/The VauLt 161 09/28/19~ 2539 Ptot PLan ~39 PP 000300011442 Fite 3821H1A~01 Group ] 161/120/The VauLt 161 11/08/19~ 26~0 PLot PLan 26~0 ~ 000300011~9 FiLe 3821H1A~01 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 11/08/1976 265~ PLot PLan ~5~ ~ 000300011~65 Fite 3821~1A0~1 Group [ 161/12~The VauLt RRDESTY...RR061 CIty of TeB/~UL8 Page 12/15/1993 Destruction $tatuc Lilting 16:15:~8 D/o~-~ item Rat, FILe Refererie # Storage lledia i = Data Ref. Brief Descri~ion Type Security CLma Storage Lucation Lo~ition Reference 161 11/15/19~ 26~ PLot PLan 266~ ~ 090)00011/,69 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group I 161/120~he VauLt 161 11/18/1976 2665 PLot PLan 2665 ~ 0903000116~ FILm 3821N1AO001 Group [ 161/120/The VauLt 161 11/~/1976 2~5 PLot PLan 2~5 ~ 000300011657 FILm 3821N1AO001 Group ! 161/1ZO/The VauLt 161 05/25/1977 2811 PLot PLan ~11 ~ 0903000116~ FiLe 3821N1AO001 Group Z 161/120/The VauLt 161 ~/~/1977 3003 PLot PLan 3003 ~ 000300011480 FiLm )821H1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 0~12/1977 3085 PLot PLan 3085 PP 090300011~85 FiLe 3821H1AO001 Group I 161/120~he VauLt 161 ~/1~1977 3171 PLot PLan 3171 ~ 0903090116~ FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group [ 161/1~/The VauLt 161 ~/13/1977 3216 PLot PLan 3216~ ~ 000300011697 FiLm 3821NIA(X)01 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt .~ ............................................................... ': ~0/0~1977 3139 PLot PLan 3139 PP 000300011/,88 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 10/11/1977 3266 PLot PLan 3266 ~ 000300011501 FiLm 3821NIA0901 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 11/23/1977 ~17 PLot PLan 3317 ~ 009300011515 FILe 387.1N1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 12/16/1977 :~56 PLot PLan ~56 ~ 000300011526 FiLm 3821NIAO001 Group ! 161/1~/The VauLt 161 12/29/1977 7~67 PLot PLan 3~67 ~ 000300011531 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 01/11/1911 3515A PLot PLan 3515A ~ 0903000115~8 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 01/12/1911 33~ PLot PLan 33~ PP 000300011509 FILm 3821N1AO001 6~.; ! 161/1ZO/The VauLt 161 01/16/19~ ~ PLot PL~ ~ ~ 09~00011537 FiLm 3821NIAO001 Group I 161/120/The vauLt 161 01/1~19113&99 PLot PLan )~99 ~ 000300011543 FiLm 3821HIAO001 ~ Group ! 161/12~The VauLt 161 02/02/1978 33~ PLot PLan 33~ ~ 000300011521 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt RRDESTY...RRQ61 City of TeemcuLl Page 3 12/t5/1993 Destruction Status Listing 16:15:68 D~. Item Rat. FILe Reformnee # Storage ledia Ref. Date Ref. Brief Ducri~ton Type SeN:urity CLass Storage Location Location Refers ~ 161 ~/1~1978 ~6Z3 PLot PLan 3623 ~ QOQSOOQ11569 FiLe 3821N1AOQQ1 Group ] 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 ~/11/1978 36~7 PL~ PLan 36/,7 ~ 0003000115~ FiLm 3821N1AO~1 Group [ 161/12~The VauLt 161 ~/~/1978 3795 PLot PLan 3795 PP 00~011580 FILm ~21H1AO001 Group ] 161/120/The VauLt 161 05~1/1978 3603 PLot PLan 3603 ~ 000300011562 FILm 3821H1AO001 Group ] 161/12~The VauLt 161 0~16/1978 3786 PLot PLan 3786 PP 000300011580 FiLm 3821Nl&O001 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 07/~/1978 3917 PLot PLan ]917 ~ 00030001159~ FiLm 3821H1AO001 Group ] 161/120~he VauLt 161 0~2~1978 ]918 PLot PLan3918 ~ 000300011606 FiLm 3821H1AO001 Gro~ ] 161/120/The VauLt 161 0~25/1978 3891 PLot PLan 3891 ~ 000300011589 Fits 3821H1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt ................................................................. ~ 161 0~28/1978 3898 PLot PLan 3898 ~ 0003~0115~ FiLm 3821H1AO001 ' Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 ~/16/1978 39~ PLot PLan 39~ ~ 00~00011609 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 10/19/1978 ~4)97 PLat PLan 6~7 ~ ~030001170~ FiLm 3821H1AO001 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 12/01/1978 6016 PLat PLan 6016 ~ 000300011616 FILm 3821NIAO001 Group ~ 161/120/The VauLt 161 12/01/1978 6139 PLat PLan 6139 ~ 000300011686 FiLe 3821N1AO001 Group i 161/120/The'VauLt 161 12/05/1978 60~ PLat PLan 6028 ~ 000300011622 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 12/~/1978 ~0~ PLat PLan 60~ ~ 000300011628 FiLm 3821NIAO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 12/13/1978 6181 PLat PLan 6181 ~ 000300011695 FILm 3821MIAO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 01/M/19~ &l~ PLot PLan 6125 ~ 000300011~1 FiLe 3821N1AO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 01/~/1979 6a7 PLot PLan 6287 PP QQQSOQQ11733 FiLe ~821MIAQQQ1 Group I t61/120~he VauLt RItDESTY...RR061 City of Tamecute Page & 12/15/1993 Destruction Status Listing 16:15:/,8 Dg;__ item R~. File Reference # Storage l4edte K i Date Ref. grief Descri~ion Type Security CL.s Store Location Location Reference 161 02/~/19~ 6~5 PLot PLan 6~5 ~ QQQ)OQ011~9 FILm 3821N1AO01 Group I 161/12Q/The Vault 161 03/~/1979 4363 PLot PLan 4363 PP 000300011743 Film 3821N1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 03/0~19~ 41~ PLot PLan 41~ ~ 00~011~9 File 3821NIAO~l Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 ~/12/1979 4)87 Plot Plan 4387 PP ~0~11~0 FILm 3821H1AO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 ~/~/19~ ~97 PLat PLan 4&97 ~ 00030001175 Film 3821N1AO001 Group I 161/1~/The Vault 161 ~/2~19~ 45~ PLot PLan 45~ ~ 000)00011767 Film )821NIAO001 Group i 161/1~/The Vault 161 ~/26/19~ 4~2 PLot Plan 4~2 PP OM)M011~6 Film )821NIAO001 Group [ 161/120/The Vault 161 08/1~1979 4786 PLot PLan 4786 ~ ~00011~1 Film )821N1AO001 Group [ 161/120/The Vault .y---- ............................................................... 1 ~9/05/1979 4~2 Plot Plan 4~2 ~ 000300011782 Film ~821NIAO001 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 09/1~1979 41~ Plot Plan 41H ~ ~0)00011669 Film )821N1AO001 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 ~/2~19~ 4145 Plot Plan ~145 ~ ~07~0011691 Film )821H1AO001 Group i 161/12~The Vault 161 11/01/19~ A8~8 PLot PLan AS&8 PP 000300011~5 File 3821N1AO001 Group i 161/1ZO/The Vault 161 11/02/19~ 4971 PLot PLan 4971 ~ ~00011~9 Film 3821NIAO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 11/0~19~ 4785 Plot PLan 4785 ~ 000300011832 Film 3821H1AO001 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 12/~/19~ 5056 PLot PLan 5056 ~ 000300011862 Film 3821N1AO001 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 12/26/19~ 45~ PLot PLan 45~ ~ ~0300011767 Film 3821N1AO001 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 01/1A/1980 &896 PLot PLan 4~96 ~ 00030001185~ FIlm 3821NIAO~1 /"' Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 01/16/19~ 58A9 PLot PLan 5~9 ~ 000300012026 Film 3821N1AO001 Gro~ I 161/120~he Vault RRDESTY...RR061 City of Tamecute Pap 5 12/15/1FF3 Destruction Statue Lilting 16:15:68 D~. Item Rat. FiLe Reference # SIlage NKlia Ref. Bate R~. Brief Description Type SKwtty Ctao Storage Location Location Refers ~'~ 161 01/26/1960 68~ PLot PLan 68~ ~ 000300011~2 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 01~1/1960 A2~ PLot PLan A2~ ~ 000300011710 FiLm 3821NIAO001 Group ! 161/120~he VauLt 161 02/21/1~80 50~ PLot PLan 50~ ~ 00~0001t867 FiLm 3821H1AO001 Group Z 161/120/The VauLt 161 02/~/1980 5229 PLot PLan 5229 ~ 000300011881 Fits 3821N1AO001 Group t 161/120/The VauLt 161 ~/11/198) &138 PLot PLan &138 PP 00030~116~ FiLm 3821H1AO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 ~/05/1980 5~7 PLot PLan 5~7 ~ 00030001188& FILm 38ZlN1AO001 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 ~/08/1980 5260 PLot PLan 5260 ~ 000300011891 FiLm 3821H1AO001 Group ] 161/120/The VauLt 161 ~/05/1980 5)~ PLot PLan 53~ ~ 00~011913 FiLm 3821H1AO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt ................................................................. ~ 161 0~22/1980 5615 PLot PLan 5615 ~ 000300011~5 Fits 3821HIAO001 ', ~ Group Z 161/1201The Vault 161 0~2A/1980 55&3 PLot PLan 5543 ~ 0~3000119~ FiLm 3821.1AQQ01 Group Z 161/12Q/The VAuLt 161 ~/ZO/19~ 5~ PLot PLan 5622 ~ 00~011906 FiLm )BZl.IAOOOl Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 B/2~1960 5663 PLot PLan 5663 ~ 00~011965 FiLm 3821H1AO001 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 0~15/19~ 5719 PLot PLan 5719 ~ OOQ3QQQll9?? FiLm )821N1AQOQ1 Group i 161/120/The VAuLt 161 10/16/1980 559? PLot PLan 559? ~ 0003000119~0 FiLm 3821.1A0001 Group i 161/120~ VauLt 161 10/22/1980 5O85 PLot PLan 5O85 PP 000~)00118~ FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group i 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 10/2~1980 ~50 PLot PLan 5~0 ~ 00~00011~7 FiLm 3821H1AO001 Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 11/1~1980 5~63 PLot PLan 5463 ~ 0~300011~1 FiLm 3821.1A0001 Group ! 161/1ZO/The VauLt 161 12/05/1980 5596 PLot PLan 5598 ~ 000300011~7 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt RRDESTY...RR061 City of Ternscuts Page 6 12/15/1993 Destruction Btatul Listing 16:15:68 D~r,-, item Rat. FiLe Reference # Storage Nedia ~ Date Ref. Brief Descri~ion Type S~urity CLass Storage L~ation LoomLion Reference 161 12/05/1980 5666 PLot PLan 5664 ~' O6~000119~ FiLm 2821H1AO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 12/05/1980 5~5 PLot PLan 5~5 ~ 000300011960 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group [ 161/120~ha VauLt 161 12/11/1960 5783 PLot PLan 5783 ~ O603002005 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 01/~/1981 5920 PLot PLan 5~0 PP O60~000159~ FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group ] 161/120/The VauLt 161 02/02/1981 5988 PLot PLan 5988 ~ 000300012081 FiLm 3821NIAO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 02/20/1981 5281 PLot PLan 5281 ~ 000300011898 FiLe 3821NIAO001 Group ] 161/120/The VauLt 161 02/21/1981 185 PLot PLan 1~5 ~ 000300011410 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group [ 161/120/The VauLt 161 03/13/1981 55~ PLot PLan 55~ ~ 0O6300011933 Fits 3821M1AO001 Group [ 161/120/The VauLt ,~--- ............................................................... ~ J3/13/1981 5776 PLot PLan 5776 ~ 000300011992 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group % 161/1ZO/The VauLt 161 ~/13/1981 5937 PLot PLan 5937 ~ O60300012~0 FiLm 3821M1AO001 Group i 161/120~he VauLt 161 ~/13/1981 5969 PLot PLan 5969 PP O6~00012050 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 B/1~1981 60~ PLot PLan 6076 PP 000300012100 Fi Lm 3821N1AO001 Grcqo i 161/120/The VauLt 161 ~/2~1981 6131 PLot PLan 6131 PP 0003 FiLm 3821~1^__a001 Group ! 1611128/The VauLt 161 ~0/1981 6116 PLot PLan 6116 ~ O603 FiLm 3821N1AO(X)1 Gro~ [ 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 ~/08/1981 6003 PLot PLan 6(X)3 ~ O603QQQ12086 Fi Lm 3821N1AOO61 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 ~/12/1981 5983 PLot PLan 5983 PP 000300O12O61 FiLm 3821.1AO601 Group i 161/1ZO/The VauLt 161 0~1~1981 6118 PLot PLan 6118 ~ 0003 FiLm 2821N1AO601 ~ Group Z 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 07/1~1981 6191 PLot PLan 6191 ~ 00O3 FiLm 3821.1AOOO1 Group i 161/1~he VauLt RIU)ESTY...RR~I City of TeamcaLm P~le ? 12/15/1993 Destructiofi Status Lietl~ 16:15:~8 D~. Item Ret. FiLe Reference # Storage Nedis Ref. Date Ref. Brief D.cri~ton Type Security CLass store Location Location Befer~ 161 0~B/1981 6030 PLot PLan 6030 PP 000300012095 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group I 161/120~he VauLt 161 ~/12/1981 61~ PL~ PLan 6183 ~ 00(5 Fits ~821N1AOO01 Grc&F ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 ~/19/1981 63H PLot PLan ~58 ~ 0003 FiLm 3821H1AO001 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 ~/~/1981 6323 PLot PLan 63~ PP ~ Ft LB 3821H1AO001 Group i 161/12~The VauLt 161 ~/31/19616371 PLot PLan 6371 PP 0003 FiLm )a21N1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 ~0/1981 ~¶6 PLot PLan ~16 PP 0003 FiLm 3821H1AO001 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 10/05/1961 6~ PLot PLan 6i~22 PP 0003 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 11/13/198163~ PLot PLan 6320 ~ 00~ FiLm )821H1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt ................................................................. 161 11/13/198163~ PLot PLan 6378 ~ ~ FiLm 3821H1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 11/1)/19816380 PLot PLan 6380 PP 00~ FiLm 3821H1AO001 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 12/1~/1981 ~13 PLot PLan 6513 PP 00~ FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group [ 161/12~The VauLt 161 1~/16/198163~ PLot PLan 63~ PP 00~ film 3821N1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 12~0/1981 ~51 PLot PLan ~51 ~ 00~ FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group ! 161/120~he VauLt 161 01/15/1982 ~56 PLot PLan ~56 PP 00~ FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group ! 161/l~/The VauLt 161 02/11/1982 6326 PLot PLan6326 PP 0003 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 02/12/1982 6806 PLot PLan G SO6 ~ 000) FiLm 3821H1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 ~/01/1982 ~11 PLot PLan 6311 PP 0003 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 ~/~/1962 6267 PLot PLan 6267 ~ 0003 FiLm 3821N1AO001 6ro4F I 161/120/The VauLt RRDESTY...RR061 City of Teemcull Page 8. 12/15/1993 Destruction Statue Listing 16:15:~8 D/~-~ Ztem Rat. File Reference # STorage Nedis ~ DmTe lef. Brief Description Type Security CLass Storage Location Location Reference 161 ~/08/1982 5815 PLat PLan 5815 PP 000300012012 Film 3821N1AOO01 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 0612611982 671Q PLot PLan 6770 PP QQQ3 Film 3821N1AQQ01 Group Z 161/120/The Vault 161 07/16/1982 6272 PLot PLan 6272 PP OQ03 Film $B21.1AOOO1 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 08/03/1982 6826 PLat PLan 6826 PP 0003 Film 3821H1AO001 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 08/24/1982 6823 PLot PLan 6823 PP 0003 film 3821H1AO001 Group ] 161/120/The Vault 161 08/30/1982 --&J~_2 PLot PLan 6862 PP 0003 Film 3821HIAO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 09/02/1982 6867 PLot PLan 6867 PP 0003 Film 3821H1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 10/31/1982 6937 PLot PLan 6937 PP 000~ Film 3821H1AO001 Group ] 161/1ZO/The Vault ./-- ............................................................... ~ dl/1~1982 6951 PLot PLan 6951 PP 0003 Film ~821N1AQO01 Group % 161/120/The Vault 161 12/1~1982 6988 PLot PLan 6988 PP 0003 Film 3821HIAO001 Group Z 161/120/The Vault 161 01/05/1983 69~2 PLot PLan 69/,2 PP 0003 Film 3821N1AO001 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 01/06/1983 6812 Plot Plan 6812 PP 0003 Film 3821H1AO001 Group Z 161/120/The Vault 161 01/17/1983 ?033 PLot PLan ?033 PP 0003 Film 3821N1AOO01 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 01/18/1983 7018 PLot PLan 7018 PP Q0(23 Film 3821N1AQ(X)1 Group I 161/12Q/The Vault 161 01/19/1983 7026 PLot PLan 7024 PP 0003 Film :3821NIAO001 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 03/01/1983 ?067 PLot PLan ~7 PP QQ03 Film 3821N1AO(01 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 03/28/1983 7091 PLot PLan 7091 PP 0(03 Film 3821N1AQ(X)1 /" Group I 161112Q/The Vault 161 ~/2Z/1983 1028 PLot PLan 7028 PP 0003 Film 3821N1AO001 Group I 1611120/The Veult RRDESTY...RR061 City of Teamcute Pege 9 12/15/1993 Destruction Status Listing 16:15:&8 D~. ]tam Rat. Fits Reference # Stor~e NKlia Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Type Securt~ CLass Storage L~ation Location Refers ~'~ 161 05/2~19~ 7176 Plot PLan 7176 PP 0003 FILm 3821HIAO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 06/20/t983 7213 PLot PLan 7213 ~ 0003 FILm 3821H1AO001 Group [ 161/120/The Vault 161 ~/20/1963 7214 PLot PLan 7214 ~ 0003 FILm 3821H1AO001 Group [ 161/1ZO/The Vault 161 06/~/1983 7222 PLot PLan 72~ ~ 0003 Film 3821H1AO001 Group Z 161/120/The Vault 161 ~/~/1983 7230 PLot Plan 7230 ~ 0003 Ft Lm 3821H1AO001 Group ! 161/12~The Vault 161 0~/19~3 71~ PLot PLan 71~ ~ 0003 Film 3821H1AO001 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 0~1~1983 7255 PLot PLan 7255 ~ 0003 Film 3821H1AO001 Group ] 161/120/The Vault 161 ~/05/1983 77.81 PLot PLan 7281 ~. O00) Film 3821H1AO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault ................................................................ ~ 161 09/~/1983 ~,'~0, Plot PLan ~,~, PP 00~ Film 3821H1AOO01 Group Z 161/120/The Vault 161 ~/~/1983 7262 PLot PLan 72~ PP 0003 Film )aZlNIAO001 Group ! 161/12Q/The Vault 161 09/15/1993 ~71 PLot PLan ~71 ~ 0003 Film 3821H1AO001 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 ~/~/1983 7212 PLot PLan 7212 ~ 0003 Fits )821N1AO001 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 10/~/1983 ~ Plot PLan 73~ ~ 00~ Film 3821H1AO001 Group Z 161/120/The.Vault 161 10/21/1983 7291 PLot Plan 7291 ~ 00~ Film 3821H1AO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 10/21/1983 7292 PLot PLan 7292 ~ ~ Film 3821H1AO001 Group I 161/l~/The Vault 161 11/16/1983 ~11 Plot PLan ~11 PP 0003 Fits 3821N1AO001 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 11/18/1983 ~ PLot Plan ~ PP 0003 Fits 3821N1AO001 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 12/15/1963 7453 PLot PLan ~53 ~ QQ03 Film 3821N1AQQ01 Group ! 161/12Q/The Vault RIIDESTY...RR061 City of TamecuLl Page 10 12/15/1993 Destruction Status Liatin~ 16:15:/~ ]tee Rat. FiLe Reference # Storage Nedi8 Date Ref. Brief Description Type Security CLass Store L~atton L~etion Reference 161 12~0/1963 7390 PLot PLan 7390 ~ OOQ3 FiLm :3821HIAOQ01 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 01/~/1986 7666 PLot PLan 7666 PP 0003 FiLm 3821NIAO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 01/28/19~ 7660 PLot PLan 7660 ~ 0003 FiLm 3821N1AN01 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 03/~/1984 ~08 PLot PLan ~08 PP 0003 FiLm 3821N1AO001 GrcN4~ ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 ~/24/1986 ?~3 PLot PLan ?~3 PP OQQ3 FiLm 3821.lACXX)l Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 05/25/1986 76~ PLot PLan 76~ PP 0O03 FiLm 3821.1AQ001 Group i 161/120~he VauLt 161 05/25/198~ ~14 PLot PLan 7814 PP Q(X)3 FiLm 3821N1AQOQ1 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 ~/29/1984 ~49 PLat PLan 75/,9 ~. 0003 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt - ~ ............................................................... 1~ ~02/1984 7897 PLot PLan 7897 PP 00~ FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group Z 161/12~The VauLt 161 0~05/1984 7796 PLot PLan 7796 PP 00~ FiLm 38~lN1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 0~/19~ 7~5 PLot PLan ~35 PP ~6 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 0~/1984 7896 PLot PLan 7896 PP 0~3 Fi Lm 3821NtAO001 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 0~11/1966 ~89 PLot PLan ~ ~ 0003 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 0~1)/19~ ~87 PLot PLan ~87 PP 0003 FiLm 3821NIAO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 0~1~1986 ~27 PLot PL~ ~27 ~ 0003 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Grc~4~ i 161/120~he VauLt 161 0~2Q/1986 7815 PLot PLan 7815 PP Q(X)3 FiLm 3821H1AQ(X)1 Group ! 161/1ZO/The VauLt 161 M~l/1984 786? PLot PLan 786? PP QQQ3 FiLm 3821mAOOO1 ~ Group Z 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 ~/10/19~ 7832 PLot PLan 7832 PP QOQ3 FiLm 3821NIAOOO1 Group I 161/120/The VauLt RIIDESTY...RR061 City of TeascaLa Page 11 12/15/1993 Destruction Btatul 'LiE!trig 16:15:48 D~. Item Rat. FiLe Reference # Storage 14edla Ref. Date Ref. Brief Descri~ion Type Security Ct.a Storage Location Location Refere 16109/14/198~ 7661 PLot PLan 7661 PP 0003 FiLm 3821.1A0001 Group i] 161/120/The VauLt 16109/14/198~ 78~ PLot PLan 78~ ~ O(X)3 Film 3821.1A0001 Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt 16109/1~1984 8052 PLot PLan 8052 PP QOQ3 Ft Lm 3821.1A0001 Group ! 161/12~The VauLt 16109/2~19~ 7892 PLot PLan 7892 ~ QOQ3 FiLm 3821NtAQQQ1 Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 09/28/1964 8094 PLot PLan 809~ ~ ~ FiLm 3821M1AOOO1 Group ! 161/12Q/The V~uLt 161 10/~/198~ 8082 PLot PLan 8C)~2 PP QQ~ FiLm 3821N1AOOOl Group ! 161/12Q/The VmJLt 161 10/1~198~ 8119 PLot PLan 8119 PP ~ FiLm 3821.1AOOOl Groul~ ! 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 1Q/19/1984 8133 PLot PLan 8133 PP QOQ3 FiLm 3821N1AOO01 Group ! 161/1tO/The VauLt 161 10/~/198~ 8026 PLot PLan 8026 ~ QO~ FiLm 3821M1AOOO1 Group i 161/1~he VauLt 161 10/26/198~ 81~ PLot PLan 8154 PP 0003 FiLm 3821H1AOQOl Group z 161/120~he VauLt 161 11/13/1984 8059 PLot PLan 8059 ~ QOC)3 FiLm 3821.1A0001 Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 11/15/198~ 8198 PLot PLan 8198 PP QQQ3 FiLm 3821N1AOOO1 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 12/1~/198~ ~38 PLot PLan 8038 PP OQ~ FiLm 3821NIAOOO1 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 12/14/1984 8112 PLot PLan 8112 PP QQ~ FiLm 3821N1AQQQ1 Group Z 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 01/29/1985 .?T PLot PLan ~?? PP OO~ FiLm 3821N1A(XX)1 Group [ 161/1~he VauLt 161 02/05/1985 8326 PLot PLan g26 PP QQ~ FiLm 3821N1AOOOl Group Z 161/120/The VauLt 161 02/~/1985 8149 PLot PLan 8149 ~ QOQ3 FiLm 3821N1AOO01 Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 02/~/1985 8252 PLot PLan 8252 PP QQ03 FiLm 3821N1AQO01 Group i 161/120~he VauLt RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecuta Page 12 12/15/1993 Destrim:Lion Status' Liatfnl 16:15:/,8 D~ [tm Rat. FiLe Reference # StorsgeNedia i ~ Data Ref. Brief Descri~im T~e Security CLass Storage L~itim L~ltim R~arence 161 02/28/1985 g13 PLat PL~ g13 ~ 0063 FiLm 3821NIAQQQ1 Group Z 161/120~he V~Lt 161 ~1~/1985 8206 PLat Ptm 8208 ~ QQQ3 FiLm 3821.1A0001 Group i 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 ~/12/1985 ~Q5 PLot PL~ ~05 PP QO~ FiLm 3821N1AOO01 Group I 161/l~/The VauLt 161 ~/22/1985 ~81 PLot PL~ 8281 ~ OOQ3 FiLm 3821N1AQQ01 Group ! 161/12Q/The V~Lt 161 ~/02/1~5 8298 PLot PL~ 8292 ~ 0O03 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl Group ! 161/12Q/The V~Lt 161 ~/~/1~5 8~67 PLot PL~ 8A62 ~ QOQ$ FiLm 3821N1AQQQ1 Group ! 161/12Q/The V~Lt 161 ~/~/1~5 8~65 PLot PLan 8~65 PP OQQ3 FiLm 3821H1AOOOl Group ! 161/l~/The VauLt 161 ~/~/1985 ~ PLot PLm ~ ~ QO03 FiLm 3821N1AQQQ1 Group i 161/12Q/The VauLt ./~- ............................................................... ~ ~/1~1985 ~ PLot PL~ ~ ~ QOQ3 Fi Lm 3821.1A0001 Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 ~/1~1~5 8366 PLot PL~ 8366 ~ OQQ3 FiLm 3821.lAQQQ1 Group ~ ' 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 ~/~/1~5 ~ PLot PLan ~ ~ 0003 FiLm 3821NIAOOO1 Group ! 161/12~The VauLt 161 05/02/1~5 ~38 PLot PL~ 8538 ~ QOQ~ FiLm 3821NIAOOO1 Groq~ ! 161/1~he vault 161 05/03/1~5 E19 PLot PLm ~19 ~ 0003 FiLm 3821.1A0001 Group ! 161/120~he VauLt 161 05/~/1~5 ~27 PLot PL~ ~27 ~ 000] FiLm 3821H1AO001 Group ] 161/120/The VauLt 161 05/~/1985 836~ PLot PLm 836~ ~ QQQ3 FiLm 3821N1AQOQ1 Group i 161/120~he VauLt 161 ~/~/1985 8365 PLot PLan 8365 ~ QQQ3 FiLm 3821.1A0001 Group i 161/l~/The VauLt 161 05/1~1985 ~17 PLot PL~ ~17 ~ 0003 FiLm 3821N1AO001 ~ Group ] 161/120/The VauLt 161 05/~/1~5 8586 PLot PL~ ~ ~ OOIX FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group ] 161/120/The VauLt RitDESTY...RR061 City of TamecaLm Page 13 12/15/199) Destruction Status Listing 16:15:&8 DK. Item R~. FiLe Reference # Storage 14edja Ref. Date Ref, Brief Description Type Security CLass Storage Location Location Refere ~'~ 161 05/31/1965 8392 PLot PLan 8392 ~ QQ03 FiLm 3821NIAQQ01 Grot4~ i 161/120/The VauLt 161 05~1/1985 8420 PLot PLan 84~ PP QQQ3 FiLm 3821.1AOOO1 Group ! 161112Q/The VauLt 161 ~/28/1985 8435 PLot PLan 8435 ~ 00~ FiLm )821N1AO001 Group ! 161/1ZO/The VauLt 161 ~/28/1985 84~ PLot PLan 8472 PP 0003 FiLm :3821N1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 ~/Z~1985 8496 PLot PLan 8496 ~ 0003 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group [ 161/1~/The VauLt 161 ~/28/1985 ~ PLot PLan 8500 ~ 0003 FiLm :382INLAY01 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 0~1~1985 8437 PLot PLan 8437 PP , QOQ3 FiLm 3821HIA~01 Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 0~12/1985 ~26 PLot PLan 85~ ~ O00& FiLm 3821H1AX)OQ1 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 0~1~1985 8489 PLot PLan 8489 PP QO03 FiLm 3821HIAQ(X)l GrcxJp i 161/120/The VauLt 161 0~24/1985 8685 PLot PLan 8685 PP QQ~ FiLm 3821H1A~Q1 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 o~z6/1985 8425 PLot PLan 8425 ~ QO~ FiLm 3821N1AOO01 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 0~/1985 ~ PLot PLan 85~ PP 0(0 FiLm 3821N1AOO01 Gro4Jp i 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 08/~/1985 8433 PLot PLan 8433 ~ Q~3 FiLm 3821NIAOOO1 Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 0~/1985 8784 PLot PLan 878~ PP 0084 FiLm 3821N1AOOO1 Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 ~/~/1985 8782 PLot PLan 8782 ~ QQ84 FiLm 3821NIAOOO1 Group i 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 09/09/1985 8788 PLot PLan 8788 ~ 00~ Fi Lm 3821N1AQQ01 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 ~/1Q/lga5 8793 PLot PLan 8793 ~ IX)IX FiLm 3821N1AQQ01 Group i 161/1~/The VauLt ~ 161 ~/13/1985 843& PLot PLan 84~ ~ QQQ3 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl Group i 161/120nhe VauLt RRDESTY...RR061 City of Teemcuts Page 12/15/1993 Destruction Status Lilting 16:15:/~B ~ item Ret. File Reference # Storage Nedi8 Date Ref. Brief Description Type Security CLass Storage Location Location Reference 161 10/02/1985 88~3 PLot PLan 88~3 PP OQ(O Film 3821H1AOQ01 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 10/24/1985 87/~ PLot PLan 874~ PP O0(X Film 3821H1AO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 10/24/1985 ooz~.~. PLot PLan PP OOIX Film 3821M1AO001 Group I 161/12Q/The Vault 161 11/06/1985 8797 PLot PLan 8797 PP 000~ Film 3821M1AO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 11/13/1985 8810 PLot PLan 8810 PP 000/, Film 3821N1AO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 11/13/1985 8891 PLot PLan 8891 PP 00~ Film 3821H1AO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 11/27/1985 8759 PLot PLan 8759 PP 0004 Film 3821H1AO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 12/02/1985 8758 PLot PLan 8758 PP 000~ Film 3821H1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The Vault ./~-- ............................................................... 12/05/1985 8819 PLot PLan 8819 PP O0(X Film 3821H1AOOO1 Group ] 161/120/The Vault 161 12/06/1985 86~2 PLot PLan 86AZ PP 000~ Film ]821H1AOO01 Group Z 161/120/The Vault 161 12/06/1985 ~ PLot PLan 88~ PP OOO~ Film 3821N1AOO01 Group Z 161/lZO/The Vault 161 12/16/1985 8091 PLot PLan 8091 PP OQ03 Film ~821.1A0001 Group ] 161/120/The Vault 161 12/20/1985 8738 PLot PLan 8?38 PP QQ(X Film 3821M1AOOO1 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 12/20/1985 8955 PLot PLan 8955 PP 000~ Film 3821H1AO001 Group [ 161/120/The Vault 161 12/31/1985 8963 PLot Plan 8963 PP OO~ Film 3821H1AQQ01 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 01/06/1986 898~ PLot PLan 898~ PP 0004 Film 3821H1AO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 01/08/1986 88&t Plot PLan PP 000~ Film ~821H1AO001 /~ Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 01/24/1986 8632 PLot PLan 8632 PP 0004, FiLm 3821H1AO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault RRDESTY...RR061 City ~ TemecuLs Page 15 12/15/1FFJ Destruction Status Listing 16:15:&8 D~. Item Bet. File.Reference # Storage Nedis Ref. Date lef. Brief Description Type Security CLass Storage Location Location Refer~ 161 01/24/198~ 8853 PLot PLan PP O00& Film 3821NIAO001 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 01/24/1~8~ 8859 PLot PLan 8859 PP 000~ Film 3821N1AO001 Group ! 161/1!0/The Vault 161 01/)1/1~66 ~ PLot PLan ~00~ PP 000~ Film :H21H1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 02/05/1~66 ~067 PLot PLan ~067 PP O00& Film )821H1AO001 Group ] 161/120/The VauLt 161 02/06/1986 gO21 PLot PLan ~021 PP 00~ Film 3821H1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 02/07/1~86 87(~ PLot PLan 8769 PP 0004 Film )821H1AO001 Group ] 161/120/The Vault 161 02/14/lf66 8742 PLot PLan 8742 PP O00& Film H21H1AO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 02/27/1~86 90~8 PLot PLan ~ PP' O00& FILm )821H1AO001. Group [ 161/120/The Vault ................................................................. ~-, 161 0]/07/1986 88/,1 PLot PLan PP 0004 Film ~821N1AO001 .' Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 0)/10/1~i6 90(i PLot PLan ~)66 PP 0004 Film ~821N1AO001 Group ] 161/120/The Vault 161 0)/21/1986 8207 PLot PLan 8207 PP 000) Film )821H1AO001 Group ] 161/1!0/The Vault 161 0]/21/1~86 8~0 PLot PLan 89)0 PP 0004 Film ~8~1H1AO00 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 03/21/1~8~ 8f~1 PLot PLan 8931 PP 0004 Film ]821H1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 0]/21/lg86 8fJ2 PLot PLan 8F~2 PP O00& Film ~821H1AO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 03/21/1~86 8~1 PLot PLan 8~1 PP O00& Film ~821H1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 ~/04/1~8t5 ~ PLot PLan ~)89 PP O00& Film ]821H1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 ~/11/lg96 8W~ PLot PLan 8~ PP 00~ Film )821H1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 05/02/lg96 912~ PLot PLan 912~ PP 00~ Film 3821HIAO001 Group ! 161/1!0/The Vault RRDESTY...RR061 City of Te~ecuts Page 16 12/15/1~3 Destruction Ststus Listing 16:15:~8 D~-- item .Rat. File Reference # Storsgel4edis I , Date Ref. Brief Description Type Security CLass Storage Location Location Reference 161 05/06/1986 9192 PLot PLan 9192 PP 000/~ Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 05/07/1986 9150 PLot PLan 9150 PP 0004 Film 3821N1A0001 6roup ! 161/120/The Vault 161 05/08/1986 5886 PLot PLan 5886 PP 000300012077 Film 3821N1AO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 05/08/1986 9138 PLot PLan 9138 PP 000/, Film 3821N1AO001 3821~1A0001 161/120/The Vault 161 05/09/1986 894/, PLot PLan 89/,A PP 0004 Film 3821N1AO001 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 05/13/1986 914~ PLot PLan 91/,4 PP 0004 Film 3821N1AO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 05/22/1986 9151 PLot PLan 9151 PP 0004 Film 3821N1AO001 6roup Z 161/120/The Vault 161 05/23/1986 9034 PLot PLan 9034 PP 0004 Film 3821NIAO001 Group i 161/120/The Vault ,/~ ............................................................... ~ J5/23/1986 9160 PLot PLan 9160 PP 0004 File 3821N1AO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 05/2~1986 9161 PLot PLan 9161 PP 0004 Film 3821N1AO001 Group L 161/120rrhe Vault 161 06/05/1986 9166 PLot PLan 9166 PP 0004 Film 3821N1AO001 Group Z 161/120/The Vault 161 06/09/1986 9196 PLot PLan 9196 PP 0004 film 3821N1AO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 06/16/1986 3516 PLot PLan 3516 PP 000300011556 Film 38ZlHlAO001 Group ] 161/120/The Vault 161 06/20/1986 9130 PLot PLan 9130 PP 0004 Film 3821N1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 06/20/1986 9210 PLot PLan 9210 PP 000/, Fttm 3821MIAO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 06/20/1986 9211 PLot PLan 9211 PP 000~ Film 3821~1A0001 Group ! 161/120/The vault 161 06/20/1986 9212 PLot PLan 9212 PP 000~ Film 3821M1AO001 ~ Group Z 161/120/The vault 161 06/2~1986 9Z~ Plot Plan 9Z~ PP O00& Film 3821HlAO001 Group ! 161/120/The Vault RROESTY..,RR061 City of Teemcuts Page 17 12/15/1993 Destruction States Ltsttng 16:15:68 Rat. FiLe Reference # Storage fiedie Doc. Item ~ Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Type Security CLass Storage Location Location Refere ~ 161 06/27/1986 9020 PLot PLan 9020 PP O01X FiLm 3821N1&O001 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 0612711986 9105 PLot PLan 9105 PP OQO FiLm 3821N1AOOQ1 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 0710111986 9096 PLot PLan 9096 PP 000~ FiLm 3821H1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 07/01/1986 9233 PLot PLan 9233 PP 000 Fitm 3821M1AQQ01 Group ! 161/1201The VauLt 161 07109/1986 9258 PLot PLan 9258 PP O00~ Fj Lm 3821N1AOOO1 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 07/11/1986 9039 PLot PLan 9039 PP 000~ FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 07/11/1986 908? PLot PLan 9087 PP O0(X FiLm 3821mA0001 Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 07/11/1986 911:5 PLot PLan 911:5 PP O00z, FiLm ~821NIAO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 0712211986 9281 PLot PLan 9281 PP 000~ Fitm 3821H1AO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 07/2l,/1986 9168 PLot PLan 9168 PP OOQ4 Fi Lm 3821NIA(X)Q1 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 0712~,11986 9178 PLot PLan 9178 PP 000~ FiLm 3821N1AOOO1 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 07/25/1~86 ~N)68 PLot PLan 9068 PP 0004 Fi Lm 3821NIAO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 0712911986 9278 PLot PLan 9278 PP 0004 Fi Lm :5821N1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 07/29/1986 928/, PLot PLan 928~ PP 0004 Fitm 3821N1AO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 0712911986 9285 PLot PLan 9285 PP 0004 Fitm 3821NIAO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 08/05/1986 7859 PLot PLan 7859 PP 000:5 Fitm ~821N1AO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 08/08/1986 9060 PLot PLan 9060 PP 000/, FiLm ~821M1AO001 Group ! 1611120/The VauLt 161 08/22/1986 9115 PLot PLan 9115 PP QO0~ FiLm :5821MIAO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt IUtDESTY...RR061 City of TtuLa Page 18 12/15/1993 Destruction Status Listing 16:15:~8 D, Qr-- item Rat. FiLe Reference # Storage Hedia [ Date Ref. Brief Description Type Security CLass Storage Location Location Reference 161 08/22/1986 9156 PLot PLan 9156 PP O00& FiLm :3821N1AO001 Group Z 161/120/The VauLt 161 09/12/1986 9155 PLot PLan 9155 PP OQO~ Film 3821N1AQO01 " Group ! 161/12Q/The Vault ............ ~ ..................................................... 161 09/12/1986 9163 PLot PLan 9163 PP OQO~ Film 3821N1AQO01 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 09/12/1986 9262 PLot PLan 9242 PP O00& Film 3821N1AQO01 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 o9/lz/1986 9263 PLot PLan 9243 PP C)OO& Film 3821M1AQQ01 Group ! 161/120/The vault 161 09/26/1986 9023 PLot PLan 9023 PP QO(X Film 3821NIAOOOl Group I 161/1ZO/The Vault 161 10/10/1986 9193 PLot PLan 9193 PP OOO& Film 3821N1AOOOl Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 10/10/1986 919~ PLot PLan 919~ PP QO(~ Film 3821NIAQOQ1 Group I 161/12Q/The Vault '~ d0/10/1986 9195 PLot PLan 9195 PP 0004 Film 3821NIAO001 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 10/10/1986 9287 PLot PLan 9287 PP 0004 Film 3821MIAO001 Group L 161/120/The VauLt 161 10/26/1986 9164 PLot PLan 9164 pP 000~ Film 3821N1AO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 10/24/1986 9223 PLot PLan 9223 PP 0004 Film 3821N1AO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 11/0~1986 9200 Plot PLan 9200 PP 0004 Film 3821HIAO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 11/0~1986 9231 PLot PLan 9231 PP 0004 Film 38Z1H1AO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 1110711986 9232 PLot PLan 9232 PP 0004 Film 3821H1AQQ01 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 11/07/1986 92~4 PLot PLan 92~4 PP 00~ Film :38ZlN1AO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 01/09/1987 9191 PLot PLan 9191 PP 0004 Film 3821H1AO001 /"' Group [ 161/120/The Vault 161 03/20/1987 9246 PLot PLan 9266 PP 000~ Film 3821N1AO001 Group I 16111201The VauLt RBDESTY...RR061 City of Teascute Page 19 12/15/lfF5 Destruction $tatul Listing 16:15:~8 D~. item Rat. FiLe Reference # Storage fiedie Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Type Security CLass Storale Location Location lefere ~ 161 ~/02/1987 8851 PLot PLan ~ 00~ Fits )aZlH1AO001 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 ~/24/1987 1~0 PLot PL~ ~ 000200011352 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 0~10/1~87 91~8 PLot PL~ 91~8 PP 00~ Fits 3821H1AO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 0~10/1967 ~ PLot PLan ~06 ~ 000~ FiLm 3821H1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 0~10/1~87 9207 PLot PLan 9207 PP 000~ FiLm 382.1H1AO001 Group [ 161/120/The huLL 161 11/~/1~67 9213 PLot PLan 9213 ~ 00~ FiLm ~821H1AO001 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 06/06/1~88 8~ PLot PLan lt54 PP 00~ Fits 3821N1AO001 Group ] 161/l~/The VauLt 161 ~/~/1~88 8053 PLot PLan ~53 ~ 00~ FiLm ~821N1AO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt ................................................................. ~ 161 0~18/1988 41~7 PLot PLan ~7 PP 0~300011~0 Fits 3821H1AO~1 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 333 Records Processed ITEM 16 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~-'II~ANCE OFFICER / CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning '~ January 11, 1994 Pechanga Casino Status Report Prepared By: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File BACKGROUND The initial Pechanga Task Force held their first meeting on December 15, 1993. At this meeting the members introduced themselves and the purpose of the Task Force was discussed (refer to Attachment No. I for the meeting agenda and all other information that was distributed to the members). Furthermore, the environmental review process and environmental impacts of the project were discussed as well as the applicability and collection of sales tax. The next meeting of the Task Force will be on January 26, 1993 with the time and.place to be announced at a later date. The purpose of the Task Force is to bring together all the parties involved and ensure identification and mitigation of all the environmental impacts. The Task Force discussed the differences between Environmental Assessments (EA) and Environmental Impact Statements (EIS). Essentially, if all significant impacts on the quality of the human environment of the project are not or cannot be mitigated, an EIS will be required. The determination of significance of an impact and whether this impact has been fully mitigated is ultimately the responsibility of the National Indian Gaming Commission (refer to Attachment No. 2 for more information regarding the National Indian Gaming Commission's National Environmental Policy Act Procedures). The environmental consultant for the project described fourteen (14) categories of impacts that will be discussed in the EA. The Task Force added three (3) new impacts to the list; these are: Social and Economic Impacts, Impacts on Police and Fire Services and Impacts on Property Values. Additionally, Wildlife Corridor Impacts and Channel Stability Impacts were added to the Biological Resources and Hydrology sections, respectively. The Task Force had some questions regarding the applicability of sales tax to this project. According to the City Attorney, all businesses owned by the Reservation and operated on the Reservation land are exempt from sales tax. Gambling activities are not subject to sales tax. Further research is being done by the City Attorney on the applicability of sales tax if other non-Indian partners, such as Grand Casinos, are involved in this project. R:\S~STAFFRlq'~ECHANOA.CC2 115194 tjs 1 FISCAL IMPACT None Attachments: 1. Pechanga Task Force Meeting No. 1 Agenda - Page 3 2. National Indian Gaming Commission o National Environmental Policy Act Procedures - Page 4 R:\S\STAlqqtIq~PI~,ANOA.~"'2 1/3~4 tjs Z) ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PECHANGA TASK FORCE MEETING NO. I AGENDA R:~S\STAFI;RIrI'~[aI~"HA~OA.CC'2 I/3/94 ,-- PECHANGA TASK FORCE MEETING 1 AGENDA 12/15/93 I. INTRODUCTIONS II. PURPOSE OF TASK FORCE III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION IV. REVIEW OF ACTIVITIES TO DATE V. PERMIT AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS A. DEFINITIONS B. SCOPE OF ISSUES C. TIMING VI. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS VII. NEXT MEETING DATE VIII. ADJOURNMENT National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Ae Terminology 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Environmental Assessment CEA) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Record of Decision Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) Lead Agency/Cooperating Agency B. Federal Agency Guidelines Comparison of EA and EIS 2. 3. 4. 5. EA as initial analyses Formal public scoping - EIS/EA Formal public review prior to draft decision - EIS/EA NEPA/CEQA emphasis on public involvement Scope and depth of analyses California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Ae Terminology/Parallels with NEPA 2. 3. 4. 5. Initial Study (IS)/compare with EA Environmental Impact Report (EIR)/eompare with EIS/EA Findings of Fact/Record of Decision Negative Declaration (ND)/compare with FONSI Lead Agency, Responsible Agency B. CEQA guidelines and agency guidelines DEFINITIONS Environmental Assessment (EA). Systematic multi-disciplinary and comprehensive technical study idea~tifying and focusing on potential environmental impacts. EA is prepared when potential environmental impacts are considered resolvable. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Expanded comprehensive technical studies summarized in a structured format for easy public understanding. EIS is prepared when scope of project is regional or of national scope, and clearly creates adverse impacts to the environment (i.e., regional land fill, reservoirs, and interstate/freeways). Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Comprehensive environmental document required under CEQA often used with both EAs and EISs. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS ---- SCOPE OF ISSUES TO BE REVIEWED 1. LAND USE 2. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION 3. WATER AVAIl,ABILITY 4. SEWAGE TREATMENT 5. AIR QUALITY 6. NOISE 7. VISUAL AESTHETICS 8. CULTURAL RESOURCES 9. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 10.' DARK SKrF, S/LIGHTING 11. HYDROLOGY 12. WATER QUALITY 13. GEOLOGY/SOILS 14. PUBLIC SAFETY Columnists , D.C. games and Trump cards By Dick Pewell "Chief Among Issue" columnist The man next to me nudged gently and asked, "Have you seen Donald Trump yet? They say he's in the room." I looked about but did fludying my notes. Suddenly strobes flashed and cameras clicked. Trump had arrived. He moved about my corner of the room, giving the reporters and camera crew plenty of opportu- not see him. The Congressional nity for photographs and video tape. hearing room was small, but packed . He smiled and greeted three people to the gills with television crews, in front of me by name and nodded photographers, and other news media people, besides those of us who would soon be testifying. Nervously, I focused my attention again on my outline of remarks that I would soon present to the congressional subcommittee. I had been over my notes a thousand times before, but somehow this setting was unique, different than had expected, filled with nervous energy and electrici~ A few moments er, an attractive woman named Ciaudia Weinstein came over to where l was sitting and introduced herself. She was an assistant producer of Minutes." I had watched her earlier move easily about the room with an all-knowing sense of confidence, as if she knew who everybody in the room was and what they were thinking about. Skillfully, she asked several questions that immediately put me at ease. She smiled and said, 'I think it would be better if I called you later. Could you give me your phone number. I don't want to interrupt your preparation for the subconunittee." I gave her my number and gratefully went back to an acknowledgement to me as well. Then promptly at 9:30 a.m. the hearings began. Why was this hearing important and what was going on? Well, Confress wanted farst hand infor- mation on how Indian casinos arc dealing with crime, especially organized crime. Is organized crime a threat and how are casinos and law enforcement dealing with the problem? Will there be problems with the mob in the future? Con- gress wanted to know if new laws should be c~cated or changes made in existing laws. Are these questions important to Minnesotsus? You bet they are. Minnesota has fortunately been relatively free of organized crime as we think of it out East. We are free fri~in crime families telling our businesses with whom they will do business and where they will buy their supplies. And that's the way we want to keep it. People like Trump would like to see Indian casino gambling halted, thus ensuring profits for New Jersey or Las Vegas, but are having a hard time finding facts that indicate organized crime is in~ltrating Indian casinos. The FBI's Jim Moody, a section chief of the Organized Crime and Drug Divi- sion, testified that there were no current cases of mob involvement with Indian casinos, nor did he have knowledge that casinos were being infiltrated. Other federal officials gave clean bffis of health as well to the Indian organizations. Congress was not tackling the relative merits of casino gambling or the ethics of gambling itseft. It simply wanted a clear, unbiased and balanced view of what was actually taking place in Indian casinos today. I am glad Congress has these concerns and is looking after those of us who host gaming. It was also nice to testify without being on the hot spot with either the city or the reservation. Never did anyone try to tell me what to say or how to say it. I simply told the Subcommittee what I saw as a police official with the saeond largest Indian ~aming casino in the world in my jurisdiction. The city paid my wage for the day of testimony and the Mdewakanton covered my travel and lodging expenses. I am grateful to both for the opportunity and the education I received from this venture. It was simply another positive step in building relationships and trust between two entities that must work together to achieve a secure future for their children. Dick Powell is chief of the Prior Lake Police Department. Ups and Downs Newspaper staff members 6nd ruders ace welcome to submit item for this column. Staff writers' initials will be used instead offnil name to avoid unnecessary cepetition. The full name ofnon-staff wrtters will be used. Each item should be 100 words or less, and the writer must include his or her name. addcess and phone number. Congratulatory or thank-yon notes of public interest will be accepted. Not all Items will be run. *Thumbs up to the Alpha Women's Center for offering frec pregnancy tests and helping women with any needs they might have during crisis pregnancies. -- Margacet Koch *Thumbs down to the woman who decided to pick deeoratlve weeds along County Road 21 while parking her car in the fight driving lane of the busy roadway recently. That kind of casual attitude is bad enough under normal traffic eonditious, but with detoured traffw on County Road 21 increasing the volume of cars these days, it was downright danszerou.~. -- From a Police Chief's Perspective by Dick lowell Editor's Note: The following anicle by Prior Lake Police Chief Dick Powell has been submitted to Casino Magazine for publication. It offers a positive perspective of communit3' cooperation and interaction. Seventeen years ago, things were much different than they are today in the Mdewakanton Sioux Community in Prior Lake, Minnesota. Economic development was limited to the few people involved in the recycling of copper telephone wire. The insulation was simply burned f~om the wire and the copper collected. Later, a business evolved under the direction of the late Norman Crooks. Crooks disposed of diseased elm wood principally delivered from the greater Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area. This business was lucrative, but soon yielded to inexpensive cigarettes and bingo. The Sioux Community came of age and casino gambling followed. Throughout this evolution, life was not easy for me as the Police Chief of prior Lake and the Sioux Community. Tw~ political factions within the Sioux Community were often at odds. Bitter feelings and sometimes violence surfaced at tribal meetings. I walked a tightrope between the two factions and tried not to be viewed as a proponent of either group. I would love to take credit for solving the community's problems, but the answer came from within. Tribal voting was done temporarily by mail instead of at the community center. Some important meetings were held away from Indian country to ease stress and most importantly, a tribal court was established to solve community problems. Much of the credit must go to people like Henry Buffalo and other tribal court members. Police now were able to do police work for the community, and the community was managing its own civil affairs. A milestone had been reached. Blockaded roads, one of my worst nightmares, ceased to exist. Occupied community buildings, where one faction tested the strength of other, disappeared, and the community continued to develop. All of this did not happen, however, without incident. One night about twenty unhappy people tested the authority of the prevailing faction. The group chose to occupy a Casino building after closing hours. The Tribal Chairman requested that the police remove the trespassers. I tried to resolve the problem, but it was clear that the occupiers were going to make a statement. and they did. Finally, I asked the Chairman to make citizens' arrests and then, I did my job. Soon, my policemen ran out of handcuffs, but the protesters promised to behave as if they were handcuffed and all went off to jail with dignity. Today, the protesters still have my respect for their co-operation. Tribal member and Secretary./ Treasurer Darlene Malta said it best recently. "We have all grown up a lot;' Today things are much different. Public Law 280 is generally accepted. The Indian community probably has fewer problems than the white cormnunity per capita. Yes, Little Six Casino calls for police assistance frequently, but that is to be expected from a business so large and active. Indian leaders have stepped forward to support the City of Prior Lake and its police department. They have demonstrated their support verbally and financially, dedicating dollars to "pay their own way" for their newly- created businesses. An outpouring of money has also gone to other worthy causes within the greater community. As a Police Chief, my agenda now includes numerous regularly scheduled meetings with Indian leaders and their business subordinates. I feel comfortable at tribal meetings where all factions and leaders participate equally. I can speak candidly and not fear that I am appearing to be partial to one side or another. When I attend other meetings or receive calls from across the United States about Indian gambling, I speak proudly about our Minnesota Indian country and the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux. I tell them about how Little Six employs more people than any other business in our county. I also tell them we have only seen the tip of the iceberg. Watch this economy over the next ten years. Times are changing in Indian Country and I am glad to be part of it. Dick Powell is the Police Chief of Prior Lake. Minnesnu:. He is a past Board member of the Minnest~ta Otie~ qf Poli~ 'c Association and has taught for the Minnesota Burcart of Criminal Apprehension. 6 lapi OaFs ATTACHMENT NO. 2 NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT PROCEDURES R:\S~STAFFR.PT~ECHANOA.CC2 1/3194 tit 4 Pederd Islbler I Vol. SO. No. 67 I Friday, April 9. 1993 I Papmad Rules Dated: Mssch 30, 1993. Susan M. Weismms, Secretary. IFR Dec. 93-8232 Filed 4-8-03; I:4S delivered to the Commission between the hours of 9 e.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, or faxsd to {202) 632- 7066 [not s tnU-free number]. Comments may be inspected by ths public be(weaa the hours of 9 tin. and noon sad 2 p.m. to 5 p.m.. Monday throuSh Fri,hy. Susan C. arlmta st (202) 632-7003, oxt. 34, er by facsimile st (2o2) 632-7oe~ (not toll-free numbers). Background The Indian Gamin8 bsulato~ Act (ICRA. or the Act)., 25 U.S.C 2701 ot seq., was signed into isw on October 17, NATIONAL INDIAN GAllNil COMMISSIOfi 25 CFR Part 511 . RIN 3141-AA~6 Procedures AGENCY: National Indian C, enlnI Commission. SUMMARY: The NsUonal Indian Gaming Commission is reposing this rule for the purpose of ~scn'bing ths procedures the Commission proposes to adopt pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1909. These proposed reZuLstlona anpplement the regulations promulgated by the Council on Environmental Quality. DATES: Comments must be received by May 10, 1993. ADDRESSES: Comments my be mailed to: NEPA Rule Comments, NstJenal Indian Gaming Commission, suite 250, 1850 M St., NW., Wuhin~ton, DC 20036-5803. Comments rosy be gamin8 (regulstsd undsr nsgo6atsd triba]4tats com]~cts}. The Commissson also published final rules regarding its review and approval of tribal gamin ordinances and resolutions us~;r sections 2710 and 2712 of the Act (58 FR 5502 0anuary 22, 1993]], Privacy Act procedures IS8 FIt 5_8_14 Uanuary 22, 1993]), compliance ~d safercement r__c~c~Hures under sections 2705 andP;706 of tie Act FR 5833 Oanuary 22, 1993]), and review and spprovsl of management contracts under sections 2711 and 2712 of the ICRA (58 FR 5818 (Janusry 22, 1993}}. Section 2711(h) of the IGRA transferred to the Commission the suthority of the .with the Commission exsn:ising a limited rob. On A 15, 19gi, ths Commission :~ tequirins clase IT 8maIn8 operations to -j compute and pay to tim Com mtqion b supplemant, rathor thn sulmms~, the annual bss required by section 2717 d CEQ's mS~htions. Tbe proposed the IGR,~L On April 9. 1992 (57 FR re6ulaUmts lain ths Commis~ion'l 12382), the Commission published a po~ciss m~r~ng the um of final rule that doffass by statubry environmsatal lrdormatioa in its terms, notsbly c]srifying the distinctions plsaning and dscision-nmkin8. Tbs betwan chss II gamin~ (mauhtsd by re~Isfions glee would require ths tribes sad the Commission] and class m Commission to be responsible for ths manag~n_ent contracts. The Commission also published proposed rules regarding disclosure of informstion under the Freedom of Information Act (57 FR 55212 (November 24, 1992]). The reguletions proposed today proride slrateSies and procedures the Commission proposes to sdopt pursusnt to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPAL 42 U.S.C. 4321 e~ seq. ConFess enacted NEPA to encourqe a nstionsl policy of protectj .enhsnctng, and restolinB the quality ~e human environment. The Counct| on Envimnmentsl Quality [CEQ.). established pursuant to NEPA, promulgated implementing regulations 1988. The ICRA established the - at 40 CI~ puts 1501 through 1508 Natlena! Indian GamIng Commjmjon NEPA and the CE~'s regulations require {NIC, C, or the Commission]. 'f'no IGRA every federal a ency to estsblish classaries pains inlo clau I, clsss IT p urea anTstrsteaies that give and clsss lIT. TIm tribes hart ~xclusive appropriate consideration to the Jurisdiction over class I gamin~. Class I1 environmental consequences of federal gaming is ] rsau ated by the tribes and the agency actions. Commission. Class lql ndng is rggulated by lndivtd~s~et~ribes end Itsare National EnTtronmmnal PUticy Act under negoUeled tribal-state compacts. Proceduree preparation of environram,Jag ana]yms ConcSrnin,a actions of the Commission that ma have a significant impact on the qu~'ty of the human anviromnsnL s y. Accordin j 518.4 ofths posmd regulations sets forth the ;i~cies ths Commission is propoain6 to slept to ensure compliance with NEPA trsd tbs Public psrtic[pstion is an sspect of the NEPA AccordinSly, SS18.S of the reposed -sulatiom providesto ensure such public involvement. Under that section, the Commission proposes to give notice to ths public af ths 8vai r of anvironmanLal documents Secretsry of the Interior undw 25 U.S.C. prepahr~ o.t, ths NEPA process. -This 81 to review and appm management seaion wo~dur~o ube ths contracts concerning Indian gaming. CommiltjOO to provir~; public notice of Sections 2710(d)(9] and 2711 of the NEPA-mlstsd hastings and public IGRA rgquire lribes to submit new meetings concerning proposed federal managmnent contrscts to the Chairman actions in wtticJa thm Commlvion is of tIM Commission for his or her review anyaired. Ths way in which notics will and approval and provide standards for be provided will be ctslsrm in,d on a approval. Sad. ion 2712 centsins case by cam basis dspmndin6 upon the standsrds and procsturm for tie magnitude and affscts ofa particaxlar Chairman's review of axisring NEPA contain rsqui~emants for the desi~nat~n of lead and coopsra ' agencies for propessd actions ~t~ox~o ving morn ~ one federal agency. A detstminstion of agency status as a lead or conperatin8 areracy is -,~ds using various factm~ set out in the CEQ's regulations. A lead sl~ncy has ths uhimats ass onsibility for the centsat of an EA or ~. A coo rating agen is responsible for ths ~elopment 3 informatkm and the preparation of environmsntal analyses st ths reqtmst of the lsad sgoncy. The Commission believes that in any instances wham it is involved in fits The purpose of thes0 pro_pog~___ provisions for the Commiuion's role as regulations is to inform the pubtic of the m lead or coo rating ags in Commlulo,, proposes to ado t pmuant preparation or environmemal to NEPA. TM propos~ regu~Uons documents is massa.-7. preparation of environmental documents, other federal agencies will -also be involvsd due to various fadstel actions, Such fedaral sctions could include the leading of federal monies to a tribe for activitiss mhted to tribal sming, or approving a leess of tribal f~ds for gamin In such cases, the Commission wi~! coopareas in the preparation of environmental documents. Sodion 518.7 contains 18354 Federal ReSister / Vol. 58. No. 67 / Friday. April O. 1993 / Proposed Rule Under NEPA, reposed qenc7 agencies may, however, permit a y actions fit one o~u~ categories. First. other than the agency to pm ~stsj a proposed action which norms]!y has When an agency allows a th~mp~rty no significant impact on the quality of pm sn EA the a ncy is required to Categorical Exclusion. Actions listed as contained in the f.A, and is rssponaib · Categorical Exclusions normally do not for the accuracy. scope. and content of require the preparation of environmental documents. The Commission believe that most of its actions fall into this category, Section la 518.9 of the pro osed tions. actions. The second category corn rises actions normally requiring ~e preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA). An EA must be prepared when the environmental consequences of · particular action ire unclear end need to be further defined. Preparation of an EA leads to one of two results. If the EA reveals that the prnposed action may have · significant irapad on the quality of the human environment, reparation den Environmen~sFlmpact Statement (EIS) (discussed below) is required. On the other hand. if the EA reveals that the proposed action will have no significant impact on the quality of the human environment. a finding of no significant im d (FONSI) is .required. ' ~e Commission believes the Chairman's authority, under sections 2711 and 2712 of the ICRA, to approve ma--~agement contracts end modifications to management contracts may triter the HEPA process and require the preparation of an EA when such contracts contain provisions for the development and construction of gaming operations or parts thereof. Section 518A0 proposes to require the preparation of an EA in such cases. Section 518.10 also provide general procedures for the preparation of all EAs. The third category consists of actions normally requir~n8 the pro ereteen of an EIS. An EIS is necessm7 w~en a proposed action may have a significant impact on the quality of the human environment. An EIS is a detailed written statement containing a full discussion dell significant environments] impacts of and alternatives to · proposed action. An EIS is necessary when, u · result of an EA. there is I finding that a proposed action will have a signf~cant impact on the quality of the human environment. rounder NEPA and the CE~'s regulations, federal qenciea ere required to take full re sibllity fur the occuracT, scope, an~tant of environmental documents. Federal the document. Federal agencies may also hire third party contractore to disclosure statement denying any financis] or other interest, in the outcome of the pro osed federal action. Section 518,12 im;~;menta these provisions, Rquistory Mattera Executive Order 12292 and the Regulatoz7 FJexibfiity Act The Commission has determined that this document is not s major rule under Executive Order 12291. The proposed rare will not have any significant effects on the economy or result in major increases in costs or prim for consumers, individual industries, federal, state, or local governments, agencies or eographical regions. The proposed ~a~e will not hays any edvere effects on competition. employment. investment, productivity, innovation, or the export/import market. Pursuant to the l~eguletory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et esq., the Commission has determined that this proposed rule 'will not have a significant economic impact on s substantial number of small entities. Because this pro osed rule is procedural in nature. it wilfn°ot impose substantive requirements that could be deemed impacts within the scope of the IGRA. Paperwork Reduction Act The information collection uirementa contained in this pro osecl ~r~; have been submitted to the O~ca of Mana eraeat and Budget (ely!B] for approv~as required by 44 U.S.C. 3501 et sag. The collection of this information will not be required until it has been approved by OMB. National Environmental Policy Act The Commission has determined that this proposed rulerookie does not constitute e major fsde~a~action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment and that no detailed statement is required pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Executive Order I2778 The Chairman of the NICC hu Order 12778, "Civil Justice Reform." 56 FR 55195. October 25. 1991. Dttsd: ~ 23, 1993. Chairman, National Indian Gaming Ganunission.* List of Subjects in Z5 CFR Part requirements. For the reasons set forth in the c~odrumble. chapter m of title 25 of the · of Federal Regulations is proposed to be eraended by adding part 518 to subchapter A. PART 51 e-NATiONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT PROCEDURE2 518.1 Ptupose and scol~ * 518.2 Definitions under this pro't.. 51a.3 Ensponsibllites. 518.4 Policy, 518.5 Public involvement. 518.6 Adoption of mviously drafted other Federal qencks. 518.7 lead and cooperating agencies. 518.8 Types of sctions. 518,9 Cstegorical exclusioDs, 518.10 Environmental assessments. 518.11 Environmental impact statements. ~18.1Z Propmotion of environmental usessments and environmental impact statements. Authority: 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.; 42 U.S.C 4321 et ISt&l This part contains the regulations of . the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC, or the Commission) implementin8 the Nations] Environmental Po~cy Act of 1969 [NEPA] [42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). NEPA established a national policy for the protection, enhancement. end restoration of the buman environment. The Council on Environments] Quality (CEQ}, established pursuant to NEPA, promulgated implementing regulations at 40 CFR parts 1501 through 1508. NEPA and the CEQ's letone require all Federal a enciea tor~eJelop procedures ~at give appropriate consideration to the environments] consequences of proposed federal agency actions that will affect the quality of the human environment. This pefi su piemanes the NEPA regulations promu~ated by the CEQ. IS1&2 Dsfiwdtkwmuadert~kpert As used in this pert~ the following terms have the fled meaninge: in sealions 2r;] end 2Co]{2] of Exocutivo signtficsmt effect on the human a Federal legbeer I YoL g, No. S? ! Pridsy, April 9, 1993 I h,,Fofed Rules 18355 environment and_ which have ~- found to have no such ok and which haltiNt ms anvilfret-_ ' I usesnet nor ml environmetal impact stststnent is ~ (b) CoopeatEn/ mesa any Federal aSmc~ o~h~e~e~ · ked agec which has J~'bdJct~oo, by law or spsdsl expertise, with respect to any environmental impact involved in a ' proposal (of a reasonable alternative) for legislation or other major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, A State or local agency of stmfiar quslificsUons or, when the effects ate on a rasewstien, en Indian tribe, may by agreement with the lead agency become s coopeaeng agency. (c) Cumulotive jml~ct is the impact on the environment which results from the incremental impact of an action · when added to oths past, present, end reasonably foreseeable future actions regardless or what agency (Feelers] or non-Federal) or person underttkss such other actions. Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but col]ectively significant actions taking place over s period of Ume, (d) Effects include: (1) Direct effects, which are caused by the action and occur at the same time /"' and p]ace, (z) IncLirect effects, which &re caused by the action end am hter inC'.me or fsfiher removed in distance, but era still re&sonaMy foreseeable, Indizect effects ms include Fowth indudng efface ~m~other effects related to induced chen es in the pattern of land use, po;~ation density or growth rate, and related effects on air and water end other natural systems, including ecosystems, (3) "Effects" and "impacts' as used in. this part are synon ous, Effucts includes ecologica~;(su°ch as the effects one is necessary. (2) An suvironmentsl assessant shall include brief discussions of the need for the proposal, of alternatives as required by secUon 102(2)(E) of NEPA, of the environmental impure of the reposed action and alternativns, and a Esttn8 of agencies and penone consultad. (i) Environmentel document includes the documents contained in pungraphs (e_L~8_), (h), sad (m) of this section. (g) Environmantel im!~ct stolemeat means a detailed written statement as re uired b~ section 102(2)(C) of NEPA. ~) Finding o/no =igni~cant impact means · document prepared by the Commission. when the Commission is acting es e !sed agency. briefly presenting the reasons why en action. other than · categorica) exclusion. will not have a dgnlficant effect on the human envbonment end for which an environmetal im act statement therefore wfii not ~ prepared. It shall include en environmental euessment or e summary of en environmental assessment and shall note en other environmental documents related to it. If the assessment is included. the finding need not repeat any of the .discussion in the assessment but may interpreted comprehensi~ely to include the natural and physical environment end the relationship of people with thet environment, This meens that economic or social effe~s are not intended by themselves to requLre preparation of an environmental impact statement. When an anvironmsntal impact statement is prepared and economic, social, natural, or physical environmental effects are (U) Aid in compliance with NEPA maintenance oparsttons during the lib wlsan n~ mvbtmmental Impact of the action. statement is nscaassry. (S) Cornpan for an impact by (ill) Fscfiitate prspsralion of-,, replacing or p~ss~i'~f°: sukstituta snvtronmsntaltmp~et statement wisa resource ot snvirortmsnit (]) NEPA process means all me&sums necessaxy for compliance with the that an environmental impact statement will is sd and considered. The [1) Descriis the proposed action possible alternatives, (2) Describe the proposed aceping process including whether, when, and where any acepin8 meetin will be held. (3) State the name sad aScLress of the NEP^ Officer. (n) Scope consists of the range of actions, alternatives, and impacts to be considered in an envLronmental impact ststernent. 'l'ae scope of an individual statement may depend o~ its relationships to other statements. To determine the scope of environmental impact statements, sgendes shad consider 3 types of actions, 3 types of alternatives, and 3 types of impacts. The include: (1~ Act/on. (i) Connected actions, which means that they are closely related and therefore should be discussed in the same im act statement. Actions are connected if ~ey:, (A) Automatically trigger other actions which may rer[uire environmental imp, act statements. (B) C.,snnot or will not proceed tmJess other actions sre taken previously or simultsnetmsly, ( ) Are interdependent parts ors lsr~ scUon and depend on the larger action for their Justification. (ij) Cumulative actions, which when viewed with other proposed actions hsvs c~Lmulativsl significant impacts and should there~, be discussed in have ~th ~s~ ~d ds~ p ~ ~ bility for pining an ~ml~ or phy. An ~ may e~ ,van if ~ ~ ~ environS! lmps~ ~slem~ wi~ to ~~ ~s ~ ~ · ; sH~ will {1} Arming ~ lmpa~ slt~ by ~m ~s ~ way Io s ~taly not ~i~ a ~ln ~ion ~ ~s of ~ ~s ~mbi~ imps of si~ aaions (e) Environmental ass6sment resins: {1) A concise public document f~ which the Commission is responsibla that serves to: (i) Briefly provide sufficient avidsea (2) Minlmizin8 impscts by limitin8 the deStee or magnitude of sn action and Its im Immmtalion. rahabilitsting. or nstoria8 the ~ onvizonment. (4] Reducing or eliminating an Impsct over tires by preservstioe sssl or reasonable alternatives to such actions is I0 t~sst them in a single alternative. (ii) Other ruesenable counes d actions. (iii) MittGallon measures (not in the proposscl action). 18358 Federal itagimr I Vol. Sa, No. 67 I Friday. April 0, 1993 I F, olx21s~ Rubis (3} Impacts. (i) Direct impacts. (iS) Indirect impacts. (iii} Cumulative impacts. (o) Signipcanfly, u umd in NEPA and tl~is part, requires consideration of both context and Intensity: (1) ContexL l~is means that the si~ni~canca of An action must be eralyzecl in several contexts such u society as a whole, the affected region, the affected inteFests, end the !oc~ty. Sj|~ni~cafice varies with the letting of the proposed oction. For instance, in the use of e site-specific action, significance would usually depend upon the effects in the locale rather than in the world u a whole. Both short end long term effects ere relevant. (2) Intensity. This refers to the severity or impact. Responsible of~ctals must be&r in mind that more than one egen may make decisions about pertiac~aspects ors major action. The following should be considered in evaluating intensity: (i) Impacts that may be both beneficial end adverse. A significant effect may exist even if the Commission believes that on balance the effect will be beneficial. (iS) The degrae to which the proposed action effects public health or safety. (iii) Unique characteristics of the geographic sea such u proximity to historic or cultu:al tesoui~el, perk lands, prime farmlands, weftands, wild end scenic rivers, or acelogically critical 8.ross. (iv) The degree to which the effects on the quality of the human environment are likely to be highly cont:overeilL (v) The deSrue to which the possible effects on the human environment ere highly uricart&in or involve unique or unknown risks. (v0 The deSFee to which the action may establish a precedent for furtAre actions with significant effects or re resents a decision in principle about a ~tura consideration. (vii) Whether the action is related to other actions with individually insignificant but cumu]etively significant im s. Significance exam if it is reason;l~e~o anticipate a cumulatively signii"icant impact on the environment. Significance cannot be avoided by terming an action temporary or by breaking it down into small component pertL (viii) The degree to which the action may salverely effect direracts, sites, highways, structures, or objects listed in or eligible for listin8 in the National Register of H~storic Places or my caum loss of destruction of significant scientific, cu]tursl, or hisloricel (ix) The degree to which the action available reports to reduce duplication may adversely affect an endangered or and ark; threatened species or its habitat that !ass (2~amUP~ar~fio~n$, defined under the been determined to be critical under the CEQ's insulations as the coverage of Endangered Spades Act of 1973 {18 pnerel matters in environmental documents with nattower sta{ements or U.S.C. 1531-1544). (x) Whether the action threatens a violation of Federal. Sate. or local law or requirements imposed for the protsction of the environment. (p) Tiering rel~era to the coverage of general matters in brooder environmental impact statements with subsequent nortower statements or environmental analyses referencing the general discussions and concentrating solely on the issues specific to the statement subsequently reparod. Tierin8 is s propriete Yw~en the sequence orltstements or analyses is: [1) From s program, plan, or policy environmental impact statement to · p m, plan, or policy statement or specific statement or analysis. (2) From an environmental impact statement on a specific actiQn st an early stage to a supplement or a subsequent statement or analysis st a later stage. Tierin8 in such cases is appropriate when it helps the lead agency to focus on the issues which are ripe for decision end exclude from consideration issues already decided or not yet ripe. JSlaJ Reepontildll6et The Chairman shall desionste an employee of the Commission to serve the NEPA Officer. Such person shah ensure compliance with NEPA and related laws. regulations. policies, and programs. J518.4 PoJ~y. (a] It is the policy of the Commission to comply with all provisions of NEPA end related laws end regulations. (b) To the fulleat extent possible. Commission shell utilize a systematic. interdisci linary approach to insure the integrato~Pt~ of the natural and social sciences end the environmental design eras in planning and decision-rookieS-- that may have an impact on the human environment. (c) The Commission shall prepare environmental documents in a clear and concise manner. addressing pertinent environmental issues. If environmental documents are pro ersd by soreanne other than the ComeTsalon. the Commission shall take res oneability for the scope and contents afro documents pursuant to § 518.12. {1) Substitute or combine environmental documents with other analyses, inca rating the general discussions ~ffo~:~sin8 on the issues at hand (40 CFR 1508.28); and (3) incorporate other environmental documents to reduce the bulk of environmental effects and values in ad uste detail so the can be compared to oe or economic an Yt ical analysea. Environmental documents end appropriate analyses shah be circulated and reviewed st the same time as other planhie8 documents related to an develop, and describe appro riate alternatives to recommendedcourses of action in any proposal which involves unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of available resources. (f] The Commission shall provide for cases where actions are planned b private applicants or other non-federal entities before Federal involvement so that: (1] Policies or designated staff are available to advise potential applicants of studies or other information foraseeabl required for later federal {2) Appropriate State and local sSenciea, and Indian tribes, are involved early in the process whoa their involvement is reasonably foreseeable. (S~ The Commission shah plan for the cost of analyses and preparation of environmental documents during the budSetary process ralating to the p_mFem or project. rn) sr prior consultation with ths Commi-.,o. may dovi.t. its normal NEPA procadums in emerSoncy situations. Such uranSemants shell be limitsd ~o actions necessary to control the immediate impacts of an emergency situation. JSlU J~ k,~mP,. .... sa~. (el Genera/iy. The Commission shall make diligent efforts to involve the public in pro ariq NEPA documents by rovidin8 p;~lic notice of NEPA-re]ated ~eertnas. public meetings, end the availability of environmental documents. {b) Env/ronmenfn/dec,meats. Environmental documents and other documents related to the NEPA process shall be sveihble to the public for review at the NIGC. 1850 M Street, NW., suite 250. Washington. DC 20036. or upon request. Documents shall be made Federal bibtar / svsiishle to the public without charge, except that for voluminous documents, the Commission may chsrp the ulster for the cost of duplication. re?c~] Heorin~s and public meetings. The Commission shall hold or sponsor public hearings or meetings in accordance with NEPA and the CEQ's regulations when them is substantial environmental controversy conc®rning a reposed action. substantial interast in ~olding · hearing. or when another agency with jurimdiction over the proposed action requests a hearing or public meeting. Requests by another agency must include a statement of reasons wha hearing on a proposed action will ~ helpful. Ira draft EIS will be considered at a hearing or public meeting, the drafi lag shall be made available to the public at least 15 days in advance of the hearing. If the purpose of the hearing or public meeting is to develop information for a draft lag. no such document need bs made available. {d} Notice. Notice of public 'hearings or meetings shall be provided accenting to the following .requirements: {1} Tbo Commission shall mail notice of hearings and public meetings to those who have requested it regarding a particular proposed action; {2} In the ces~ of an action with effects of national concern. the Commission shall publish notice of hearings and public meetings in the Federal Register and shall mail notice to all national organizations expected to be interested in the matter; and {3} tn the case of an action of locel concern. the Commission shall provide notice individually to those patens or entities expected to be internted. or by publication in local newspapers or newsletters that may be expected to media. or posting of notice on and off the ·its in the area whore the action is to occur. o~oe rodMsJ s90n~m. When the Commission determines , that preparation of environmental documents is necessary, the Commission may adopt previously drafted EAs or ]aSs, or portions thereof. prep·red by another Federal agency for use in a currant EA or lag. provided that the original document resets the standards for an adequate EA or EIS under the r~gulations. If the actions covered in the original document and the proposed action are substantially the same, the Commission need not - redrculate the adopted Federal document, except as a final EA or lag Vol. 58, No. 67 I Friday, AprU O, 1903 / Proposed Rule 18357 If the Commiasi6n acts as a cooperating agency pursuant to § 518.7. it may adopt. without rocirculating. the EA or EIS ore lead al~ency if, after an independent review of the document, the Commission concludes that its comaants and suggestions have been satisfied. When the Commission ado ts an EA or EIS which is not final, or wCen the pro action being assessed is rafsPrr~tK to~to the CEQ bocausa of interagency disagreement, or the ststement's adequacy is the subject of s judicial action which is not final, the Commission shall specify this information in the current EA or ]aS, [~'&? The Commission shall cooperate with other Federal and state agencies, Indian tribes, individuals, or entities to ensure that NEPA considerations are addressed early in the plannin process. When a proposed action of ~e Commission trillere the NEPA process, the Commission shall consult with other agencies to determine the extent of Federal involvement in various aspects of the proposed action. If several agencies will be involved due to various Federal actions, the Commission shall comply with the requirements in the CF_~'s regulations (40 CFR 1501.5 end 1501.6] for determining the scope of its involvement either as a lead or cooperating agency. iSleS Types~sct~M. The following are the cetagories of proposed actions associated with the Commission's programs and activities: (a) CoteaorjcQ] exclusions. Actions which normally do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment and which therefore do not mquira the preparation of an Environmental assessment (EA) or an Environmental impact statement []aS]. {b) Actions normoily requirjn preporation of on EA. Actions let do not meat the criteria under paragraph (a] df this section, end whose effects are not defined well enough to permit an early determination that an los is required. The purpose of an EA is to allow the Commission to determine whether a proposed action will bsve a significant effect on the environment, rasulting in the need for preparation of either a finding of no significant impact [FONSI] or an loS. (c] Ac~on· requir~n~ t~e pr~ ration o/on EIS. Actions that normal' y~n~vo a significant effect on the quality of the human environment and that normally require the preparation of an JS1tl CABark-' esdMelofi~ {a) Categorical exclusions. The followin8 are actions of the Commissioc that meet the criteria for categorical exclusions and normally do not ruquire the reparation of an EA or an (1~ Routine administrutive activities such as personnel activities, internal organizational chan~.ss. budget matters. inventories, collection of data and information nocasssx7 to can7 out the Commission's duties, educational end informational programs and activities, establishing a schedule of fees. and collecting such f~ms from the operators of each class H gaming atlivity regulated by the Commission. pursuant to 25 U.S.C 2717; (2] Monitoring class il gaming conducted on Indian lands, including the inspectkm of books, records. and the promesas where class II gaming is conducted as provided under 25 U.S.C. 2706C0); (3} Conducting or causing to be conducted beckyround investigations oir persons or entities with · financial interest in, or having management responsibility for, msnagemeat contracts for class II gsming operations under 25 U.S.C. 2706Co)(3); (4] Issuing certificates of self- regulation to Indian tribes pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 2710(c); (5) The CheLrnmn's approval of class II end class [] tribal gaming ordinances. resolutions, and of modifications to such ordinances and resolutions under 25 U.S.C. 2710Co), 2710(d], and 2712[b}; {6} The Ch~irman's approval of management contracts and of modifications to management contracts under 25 U.S.C.. 2711[b] and 2712(c], except that when the manoRsmear contract or modification provides for the development or construction of a {b) Exceptions to cotqoricl exclusions. If them are extraordinary circ~mstences which require the Commission to conduct appropriate studies to determine If the categorical exclusion classification is proper for a particular action. the Commission shall conduct or cause to be conducted such studies. including. if necessary, the preparation of an EA concerning the action. Such extraordinary circumstanc-os includo: [1) Actions that may have si ificant adverse effects on public heal~a~r safety; {2} Actions that may hav~ highly controversial env&onmental affects; |3} Actions that may hays highly uncertain environmental affects or involve unique or unknown environmental risks; 38358 Federal Rqbter I Vol, 58, No, 67 I Friday, April 9, 1993 ! Proposed Rule (4} Actions, re|ee~d to othar actions, that individually he, insi ficant environmental effects but ~ {5) Actions that may establish a precedent for future actions or thee re resent a decision in principle about a TJture consideration with significant environmental effects. Jsl&lO EMommmesssf,.s.M& {a) Ad/ons rmyu/r/ng ~he preparelion o/on E4. If the prepared action is not c, utegoricelly excluded and prepration of an EA will mist in determining environmental impacts of s propooed action, the Commission shall be responsible for the preparation of an EA in accordance with § 158.12. The Chairman*s approval or modification of management canines that provide for. the development and construction of gamins facilities, or parts thereof, normally will require the preparation of ~o) Form end con2nf. An EA may be prepared in any format, provided that it is prepared in · clear and concise manner and contains all of the information necessary to determine whether a proposed m~tion may have a significant impact on the human environment. The Commission shall involve environmental agencies, applicants, and the public to the extent practicable in preparing EAs in accordance with § 518.5. An EA shall include: (1} A brief discussion of the need for th?z~]~t;rs~dee~vc~°:ij the proposed action: (3) ^dveru and beneficial environmental impacts of the proposed action; end [4) ^ list of agencies and parsons consulted in the preparation of the EA. (c) Wr/ffen dc~sions. Based on the information contained in on EA, Commission shall determine whether to prepare a FONSI or, whether there is need for the preparation of an EIS. If the Commission determines that preparation of s FeNSt is appropriate, the Commission shall prepare a written decision in combination with the EA, (d) Time tim~tL If, based on the information contained in an EA, the Commission determines that s proposed action will have no significant impact on the quality of the human environment, it shall repare s FeNSt. The Commission shal~mako the FONSI available to the ainfac~ed public in accordance with § 518.5, Under certain circumstances, the Commission shell make a FeNSt available for public review for 30 days before Commission makes a final determination and before any action may 'n. A FONSI shall be marie availab~ for public reviww prior to a final deearrninaUon when: {1) The proposed action is closely similar to one which normally requires the pre sation of an !~S; or (2) ~'~: nature of the proposed action is one without precedent. 9518.11 Envkeamentel statementre, {a) Adions requiting the preparation o/on EIS. The Commission shall be responsible for the preparation of an EIS in accordanc~ with § 518.12{c), when is determined that the approval or modification of a management contract containing provisions for development and conatruction of gaming facilities will hera a significant impact on the quality of the human environment. In preparing an EIS, the Commission shall cam ly with all provisions of the CE~'s regu~;tions as set forth in 40 CFR parts ~502 through {b] Implementing the EIS. The d~cision concerning a proposed action for which an EIS has been prepared shall be documented in a R~c, ord of !~cision {ROD). The Commiuion, when acting as lead agency or in cool~kration with other agencies, shall monitor activities subt~luant to the issuance of an ROD to ensure that its provisions are carried out. The Commission shall also implement any mitigation activities identified in the ROD. When acting as · e lead agency in an action, the Commission shall: {1} Include appropriate mitigation requirements in the ROD; ~2} Upon r~lu~t, inform other agencies involved in the N~PA proc.~s oftha progress of mitigation allarts; and {.q} Upon request, make available to the public the results of relevant monitoring. ~5~.~ ~oparedan o~ ~vltonmomst aoo~um~nto and mvh, onmorw~ Impa~t {a} Information. The Commiui~n may require the applicant{s} seeking approval of a management contract or modification to submit environmental information for use in the preparation of environmental documents. The Commission shall evaluate th~ information submitted and shah take res onsibility for its accuracy. ~] Environmental assessmenb. If the Commission, actin8 as a lead or cooparati n8 agency, permits another party, such as the applicant(s) of a management contract or · third l~rty evalasso the tn~mafion submitted and shah varify and be mmponsibie for the accuracy, mo0pm, and content of the E ~ (c) kw/tonmenfa/ira/Me ~atemen, The Conunjuion, whdm acting as a lad or cooperating agmacy, shah prmlMre or aid in the prelmreeion of an EIS. When actin as a lead qmacy, the CommiMion may ~ire a third party, selected by the Commission. to prwpam an EIS. When the Coffunission clam to hire s third party contractor, the Commission shall prepare a disclosure statement to he executed by the contractor specifying that the contractor ha no financial or other intersst in the outcome of the action. Also. when b Commission hires a third party contractor. the Commission shall furnish guidance on the proposed sctioa and shall ,lp, narttcipate in the pre arealan of the EIS. · Conam salon sh:~l also i independently ~vsluate the information submitted and shall verify and be responsible for the accuracy, scope, and content of the EIS. [FR Dec. 03--70(t4 Fikd 4-=8-~3; 8:45 aml DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Coaet Guard 33 CFR Pert 117 [CGD13-e3-4~ Drawbridge OlmraUoa FleguisUona; Youage 9my and Low~ and Clark Rivet, OR ACTION: Notice or proposed SUUMARY: At the request of the Oregon Departmeat ot Treasportation. the Coast Guord proposes a cban to the regulations gaveruing ~e New Youngs Bay BHdge echoes Younga Bay. mile 0.1. the Old Youngs Bay BridSe across Youn Bay, mile 2.4, and the Lewis and ~sar~ River BridSe ecross the Lowis and Clark Rivsr, mile 1.0, at Astoria, Oregon. This cheap would require that four hours advance notice be given for opening any of the three drawspans from 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. This proposal is being roads becsuss in · period of 30 months, only 19 opmainga were mads for the passage of vessels during the cited hotin. This action would relieve . the owner of the bridges from having a eraon constantly available st the Cridges. This change should still provide for the reasonable needs of navigation. ----. DATES: Comments sSould be received or before ]day 24, t993 ITEM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVA CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning January 11, 1994 An Interim Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted by Urgency Measures Requiring a Conditional Use Permit for the Establishment of Nightclubs, Teen Clubs, Dance Halls, Bars and Cocktail Lounges, Billlard Halls, Massage Parlors, and Video Game Arcades Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends that the City Council: Issue a report describing the steps taken to address the condition that resulted in the adoption of the Ordinance; and 2. Adopt an Ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94- AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUIRING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NIGHTCLUBS, TEEN CLUBS, DANCE HALLS, BARS AND COCKTAIL LOUNGES, BILLlARD HALLS, MASSAGE PARLORS, AND VIDEO GAME ARCADES BACKGROUND Ordinance No. 93-05, entitled "An Urgency Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula Declaring a Moratorium on the Establishment of Nightclubs, Teen Clubs, Dance Halls, Bars and Cocktail Lounges, Billlard Halls, Massage Parlors, and Video Game Arcades Without a Conditional Use Permit" was adopted by the City Council on February 9, 1993. Ordinance No. 93-05 was in effect for forty-five (45) days and expired on March 26, 1993. Ordinance No. 93-07 went into effect on March 26, 1993 for a period of ten months and fifteen days, and will expire on February 9, 1994. The Ordinance that is before the City Council would be in effect for one additional year and will expire on February 9, 1995 unless repealed by the adoption of the City's Development Code. R:\S\STAFFRF~J'P-ORD.CC 1/3194 tjs DISCUSSION Pursuant to Government Code 65858(d), ten days prior to the expiration of an Interim Ordinance or any extension, the legislative body shall issue a written report describing the measures taken to alleviate the condition which led to the adoption of the Ordinance. The Discussion Section of the agenda report shall serve as the written report required pursuant to State Law. Extension of Interim Ordinance Staff is in the process of preparing a permanent Development Code that will be consistent with the City's General Plan. It is anticipated that uses requiring a Conditional Use Permit including nightclubs, teen clubs, dance halls, bars and cocktail lounges, billiard halls, massage parlors, and video game arcades will be addressed in the Code. Staff is now completing its meetings with the Development Code Advisory Committee and hopes to present the draft Development Code to the Planning Commission in January. Because of this time frame it is necessary to extend Ordinance No. 93-07. Prior to the adoption of Ordinances No. 93-05 and 93-07, the uses which are included in the Interim Ordinance required only Plot Plan approval under Ordinance No. 348. If one of these uses was proposed in an existing building, then staff would have processed the request as a tenant improvement. This would have been an over-the-counter, staff level approval. The purpose of Interim Ordinance is to require a conditional use permit for these uses. The conditional use permit process allows the City greater control in order to regulate potentially sensitive uses and assure their compatibility with adjacent uses. FISCAL IMPACT The extension of the Interim Ordinance will not result in any fiscal impacts to the City. Attachments: 1. Ordinance No. 94- - Page R:%S%STAFFRPI'%CUP-ORD.CC 1/3/94 tit 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 94- R:\S\STAFFRFI~CUI~-ORI).CC 1/3/94 ORDINANCE NO. 94- AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEhlECULA REQUIRING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ~ ~T.,-~k.IIT,Tg~ OF NIGHTCLUKq, Ti~.RN CLUBS, DANCE HALLS, BARS AND · COCKT~H, LOUNGES, BILLIARD H~LI~, MASSAGE PARLORS~ AND VIDEO GAME ARCADES THY~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF ~A DOES !tERERy ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. That it is the Mission of the City of Temecula to maintain a safe, secure, clean, healthy and orderly community; B. That it is necessary to re-examine the regulations of the zoning ordinance relating to the establishment of nightclubs, teen clubs, dance halls, bars and cooltrail lounges, b'filiard halls, massage parlors, and video game arcades without a conditional use permit; C. That in order to m-examine said reguhtion s, a requirement for the approval of a conditional use permit for the establishment of such uses was adopted pursuant to Ordinances No. 93-05 and 93-07. D. That said study had already begun, and that it is necessary, pending completion of said study and the enactment of regulations based thereon, that the requirement for a conditional use permit for the establishment of nightclubs, teen clubs, dance halls, bars and cocktail lounges, billiard halls, massage parlors, and video game arcades be extended; E. That if such ordinance were not extended, establishment of such nightclubs, teen clubs, dance halls, bars and cocktail lounges, billinrd halls, massage parlors, and video game arcades without a conditional use permit would be undertaken that 'may compromise the public health, safety and weftare. Section 2. That notwithstanding any provision of the City of Temecula Ordinance 90-04, during such time as this ordinance is in full force and effect, no person shall establish a nightclub, teen club, dance hall, bar and cocktail lounge, b'~liard hall, massage parlor, and video game arcade without a conditional use permit. No officer, employee or agent of the City shah issue any permit or other enti~ement which would have the effect of allowing a nightclub, teen club, dance hall, bar and cocktail lounge, billiard hall, massage parlor, and video game arcade without a conditional use permit, during such time as this ordinance is in full force and effect, and in addition, any permit or other entitlement issued shall be revoked. R:\S\STAFFRIvBCUP-ORD.CC 1/3194 ~s 4 Section 3. This Urgency Ordinance is enacted under the authority of the California Government Code Section 65858 and shall be of no further force and effect twelve (12) months from February 9, 1994. Section 4. This Ordinance is adopted pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, is hereby declared an urgency measure and shall take effect on February 9, 1994. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Interim Ordinance adopted by urgency measures and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted and published as required by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this llth day of January, 1994. ATIEST: RON ROBERTS MAYOR JUNE S. GBI~RK CITY Ct~RK STATE OF CALmORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMF_,CULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Interim Ordinance No. 94- was duly adopted and passed as an urgency measure at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 11th day of January, 1994, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCn~MmMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: XUNE S. CITY R:~S\STAFFI,FI~CUP-ORD.CC 13194 ITEM NO. 18 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPRO~ CITY A'I'I'ORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Plannsng January 11, 1994 Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. 1 - Second Unit Permit - Appeal of Conditions of Approval No. 31 and 42 (requirement for the all- weather access to the second unit) Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: Planning Department Staff recommends that the City Council: DIRECT the Planning Commission to consider amending Section 18.28.A.C.(10) of Ordinance No. 348 pertaining to the type of paving material required for access to second dwelling units; and ADOPT Resolution No. 94- , approving the appeal of Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. 1, subject to the condition that it comply with Section No. 18.28.A.C.(10) of Ordinance No. 348, as amended. BACKGROUND This item was originally heard by the City Council at their December 14, 1993 meeting. However, after discussion, the matter was continued until January 11, 1994 with direction to staff to prepare an amendment to Ordinance No. 348 modifying the definition of a satisfactory paving surface material for access purposes to second dwelling units. Planning Staff contacted the Riverside County Fire Department to determine the standard that they use for all-weather access. Fire Department staff stated that, in this particular instance they utilized the City of Temecula standards for all-weather access. They also informed Staff that their major criteria was that a 30,000 pound fire truck be able to have access to the site. They stated that other types of paving material would be acceptable, but the integrity of their ability to support the fire truck must be demonstrated in a report by a qualified engineer. The present access requirement is established in the City Zoning Code (Ordinance 348). In order to amend the Zoning Code, State Law requires that the Planning Commission must first consider the matter at a noticed public hearing. After receiving the Commission's recommendation, and conducting its own hearing, the Council may amend the Zoning Code accordingly. Staff recommends that the Council direct the Planning Commission to consider the following amendment (indicated in bold) to Section 18.28.a.c.(10) of Ordinance No. 348: "Any second unit placed more than 150 feet from a public right-of-way shall be required to R:~S~.STAFFRFf~179PA93.CC2 113194 idb provide all-weather access for emergency vehicles from s publicly maintained road. Asphaltic paving is required for all-weather access; however, this requirement may be waived if all of the following conditions are met: A soils report (prepared by s licensed soil or civil engineer) is submitted to the Department of Public Works for approval. The report shall determine the stability of the sdls at the project site and contain recommendations for altamative material types and any associated drainage facilities that will support a 30,000 pound emergency vehicle. The applicant records a waiver against the property, releasing the City of Temecula of any liability in the event that emergency vehicles cannot utilize the drive lane. The City of Temecula will not accept or maintain the roadway until it has been improved to City of Temecula Standards as identified in the Circulation Element of the General Plan." The language has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and the Department of Public Works. Regarding the appeal, Staff recommends that Condition of Approval No. 42 be amended to include the following language: "An all-weather access road shall be provided along either Aussie Avenue or Jeffrey Heights Road from Calle Girasol to the proposed driveway to the site per Ordinance No. 348, or as it may be amended." Staff recommends that Condition of approval No. 31 (requiring street plans for improvements) remain as written. FISCAL IMPACT None. Attachments: Resolution No. 94- - Page 3 Conditions of Approval - Page 7 Draft Ordinance No. 94- - Page 15 R:~S~STAFFRF~179PAg~.CC2 1/3/94 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 94- R:\S\STAFFRPT~179PA93.CC2 1/3/94 kib ~ ATTACHMENT NO. I RESOLUTION NO. 94.- R:~S~STAPFRPT~I79PA93.CC2 1/3194 klb 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 · RESOLUTION NO. ~t- A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING ~ APPEAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0179, AMENDMENT NO. 1, SUBJECT TO ~ CONDITION THAT IT COMPLY WITH SECTION NO. 18.28.A.C.(10)OF ORDINANCE NO. 348 AS AMENDEr} PERTAINING TO 'rv~ DEFINITION OF ALL- WEATHER ACCESS FOR EMERGENCY VIn~CLF~. Wt!RRRA. S, Raymond and OdeRe D~robert and MicheHe Hapoit fried Planning Application No. 93-0179 in accordance with the Riverside County land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WItRRR&S, said Planning Application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WH'EREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Planning Application on November 1, 1993, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; V~crEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering aH testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons deserving to be heard, said Commission considered all facts relating to Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. 1; WHRREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission approved said Planning Application; WI~,RR~S, an appeal of the Planning Commission decision for conditions of approval pertaining to the definition of all-weather access for emergency vehicles was made in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, and Planning Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WI~-RR~kS, said Appeal application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WtlRREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Appeal on December 14, 1993, at which time Staff was directed to prepare an Amendment to Section No. 18.28.A.C.(10) pertaining to the definition of all-weather access for emergency vehicles; and WH~,~, the City Council considered said Appeal on January 11, 1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; R:\S\STAFFRFrXI79PA93.Ct22 1/3194 klb 4 WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Staff Report regarding the Appeal; A. The city council, in approving of the proposed Planning Application, makes the following findings, to wit: 1. The project is consistent with the General Plan. 2. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. The proposed project is consistent with Ordinance No. 348. The project meets the criteria prescribed under Section 18.28.a. (Second Unit Permit) of Ordinance No. 348. 3. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general weftare; conforms to the logical development of the land and is compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. The project meets the criteria prescribed under Section 18.28.a. (Second Unit Permit) of Ordinance No. 348. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area. The project conforms with applicable land use and development regulations. 4. The proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment since the project is a Class 3 Categorical Exemption pursuant tO tile California Environmental Quality Act. B. As conditioned pursuant to Section 4, the Planning Application proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future development of the surrounding property. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment since the project is a Class 3 Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Tcmecula City Council hereby approves Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. 1 to construct a second dwelling unit located at 31550 Calle Gimsol and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 914-480-006 subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto. R:~S~STAFl~RI~I/9?A93.CC2 1/3/94 klb B Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1 lth day of January, 1994. RON ROBERTS MAYOR ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecuh at a regular meeting thereof, held on the llth day of January, 1994 by the following vote of the Council: COUNTERS: NOES: COUNCH~MEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: JUNE S. GI~K CITY CLERK R:~S\STAFFRFIlI'/gPA93.CC2 1ll/94 k]b [~ ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:\S~TAl~I79PA93.CC2 lf3/~t lrJb 7 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No.1 - Second Unit Permit Project Description: A request to construct a new 2,195 square foot dwelling unit on a parcel which already contains an existing 1,536 square foot structure. The new unit will become the primary unit end the existing structure will become the secondary unit· The project is located in the Rural Residential (R-R 2 1/2) zone. The project site is located at 31550 Calle Girasol. Assessor's Parcel No.: 914480-006 Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Requirements e The use hereby permitted by this Planning application is to construct a new 2,195 square foot dwelling unit on a parcel which already contains an existing 1,536 square foot structure. The new unit will become the primary unit and the existing structure will become the secondary unit. The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. I - Second Unit Permit. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. The second unit shall be used for family members or rental purposes only and may not be sold as a separate unit unless the lot is subdivided pursuant to all applicable laws and local ordinances. The second unit shall be used as a dwelling unit only, and no businesses or home occupations of any kind may be conducted from or in the second unit. This approval shall be valid for five (5) years. The project shall be consistent with Section 18.28.a of Ordinance No. 348. The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as shown on the site plan marked Exhibit A, or as amended by these conditions. R:\S\STAFFRPT~I79PA93.CC2 113/94 klb 8 8. Building elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit B. Wood Siding: Earthenware (Frazee 5203 M) Wood Trim: Candlewax (Frazee 4500 W) Roof: Composition Shingle Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project e The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars (878.00) County administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within .such forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be voided by reason of failure of condition. Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits 10. Thc applioant shall oomply with Ordinanoo No. 8C3 by paying tho foo rocluirod by that ordinonoo whioh is basod on (the gross noraago of the paroo~ proposod for dovolopmont). Should Ordinanoo No. 663 bo ouperoodod by tho provisiono of a I labitat Conoorvotion Ran prior to tho paymont of tho fooo roquirod by Ordinonoo No. 8~:3, thc applioont shall pay tho foo roquirod undor tho I lsbitot Conaorvation Ran ac implomontod by County ordinanoo or rosolution. (Deleted at the Planning Commission hearing on November 1, 1993). Prio~ to the Issuance of Building Permits 11. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 12. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1991 edition of the Uniform Building, Plumbing and Mechanical; 1990 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code Title 24 Energy and Handicapped Regulations and the Temecula Code. 13. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. 14. The applicant shall provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans submitted for plan review. 15. The applicant shall provide electrical plan including load calcs and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. R:~S~STAFFRPT~I79PA93.CC2 1/3194 klb 9 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of Public Works. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site .plan all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. General Requirements 16. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all onsite flat work and improvements) grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right- of-way. 17. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 18. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing contiguous to the site. plans shall be improvements Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 19. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. 20. The Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board Planning Department Department of Public Works Riverside County Health Department Community Services District General Telephone Southern California Edison Company Southern California Gas Company 21. A Grading Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, City Standards, and as required in these Conditions of Approval. R:\S\STAR;1t-w~I791*A93.CC2 1/3/94 kJb 10 32. The Developer shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be executed guaranteeing the construction of the following public and private improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. A. Street improvements B. Storm drain facilities C. Sewer and domestic water systems 33. All required fees shall be paid. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 34. The Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Fire Department Planning Department Department of Public Works 35. All necessary construction or encroachment permits have been submitted/accomplished to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. 36. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the Department of Public Works 37. All building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 38. The Developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established per acre/unit as mitigation for traffic signal impact. 39. The Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which the Developer requests its building permit for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to the Developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, the Developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount of the bond shall be 92.00 per square foot, not to exceed e 10,000. The Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, the Developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of R:'xS',..~TAFFR.P~!79PA93.CC2 1/3/94 klb 12 any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; provided that the Developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof. Prior to Issuance of Certification of Occupancy 40. The Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho California Water District Eastern Municipal Water District General Telephone Southern California Edison Southern California Gas Planning Department Department of Public Works 41. All improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards, including but not limited to curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees, street lights on all interior public streets, signing, striping, traffic signal interconnect, and traffic signals. 42. Adequate right-of-way shall be dedicated along Jeffrey Heights Road and Aussie Avenue to provide for a 60 foot full width right-of-way including a cul-de-sac at their termini and recluired corner property line cut off in accordance with City Standards. An all-weather access road shall be provided along either Aussie Avenue or Jeffrey Heights Road from Calle Girasol to the proposed driveway to the site per Ordinance No. 348, or as it may be amended. The driveway and the access to the site shall be designed and constructed relative to the ultimate design of Aussie Avenue including a turn around per City standards at the terminus. In order to provide for a paved section along Aussie Avenue, the improvements shall accommodate the natural drainage course crossing the-road. All necessary permits shall be obtained from appropriate agencies; i.e. the Department of Fish and Game, Army Corps. of Engineers, and Regional Water Quality Control Board. 43. In the event road or off-site right-of-way are required to comply with these conditions, such easements shall be obtained by the Developer; or, in the event the City is required to condemn the easement or right-of-way, as provided in the Subdivision Map Act, the Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City for the acquisition of such easement at the Developer's cost pursuant to Government Code Section 66462.5, which shall be at no cost to the City. R:\S\STAFFRPT~I79PA93.CC2 1/3/94 klb 13 OTHER AGENCIES 44. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District transmittal dated October 14, 1993, a copy of which is attached. 45. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Health Department transmittal dated October 1, 1993, a copy of which is attached. 46. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Fire Department transmittal dated October 25, 1993, a copy of which is attached. R:~S\STAFFRPT~179PA93.CC2 1/3194 klb 14 ancho Wmr Board or Directors: Dou~ Kulb~rg Prt~a~nt ~e~rey L, ~[in~er $r. Vice PNsi~nt ~ph H. Daily ~an~ ~ Huffhe C~bm F, So Lia D, Peteran Rich~ D. StetTey Olllcers: Jehn F. Fiennillar General .%[anaeer Phillip L, Forbes Dirt, vtor ,ff Finant'e- Treu.~urt, r E. P. 'l)oh" Lemons Kenneth C. Denly & Masnten:ant'e Pert!.° Ft. Luuek C,mtrn|ler Linda .%1. Fre!~oso · Jennin~(s. F'ngstrnnd & }Jenrikson October 14, 1993 R- CEIV'-"D OCT 18 15S3 Mr. Matthew Fagan City of Temecula Planning Department 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 SUBJECT: Water Availability APN 914-480-006, PA93-0179 Second Unit Permit Dear Mr. Fagan: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RC%VD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Senga Dohert!/. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Steve Brannon, P.E. Development Engineering Manager SB:S0:eb08/F186 cc: Senga Doherty, Engineering Technician Ranchn Lalifomia Wntt, r Di~tr:et jJ~,..;l llhzll..,d * :'-t,"llk.t. il,~tNe:7 * T...::.~!:Lt.C.,;:'~,r.-.i.~'J'-~-:.,I~.' * ~,1+;,,;7,~-411)1 * F":': TO: FROM RE: County of Riverside DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPT. Matthew F ,~T~:nhew r n~ MAK en Health Specialist IV SECOND UNIT PERMIT NO. PA93-0179 DATE: October 1, 1993 RECEIVED CO! 5 1993 J~Bs'd .............. The Dcpa~uuent of Environmental Health has reviewed the Second Unit Permit No. PA93-0179 and will require the following items PRIOR TO BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL: Adequate/satisfactory detailed soils percolation testing in accordance with the pro~dures outlined in the Rivehide County Waste Disposal Booklet entitled *Waste Disposal for Individual Homes, Commercial and Industrial. 2. A "will-serve" letter for potable water from the appropriate agency providing water service. 3. Three detailed drawn to scale (1 "=20') of the proposed subsurface sewage disposaJ system and floor plan/plumbing schedule to ensure septic rank sizing. SM:dr (909) 275-8980 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTh/ENT 210 WEST SAN JACIFTO AVENUE * PERilS, Cexr rgrORNIA 92570 · (909) 657-3183 October 25, 1993 T0: P!an~ing Department ATTEN: Matthew Fagan RE: PA93-0179 With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced second unit permit, The Fire Department recoaattends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with the City of Temecula Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: The water mains shall be a minimum of 6" diameter and shall be capable of providing a potential fire flow of 500 GPM for 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure The re_quired fire flow shall be available from a standard fire hydrant (6"x4"x2 1/2") within 500 feet of the property. The applicant/developer shall be responsible to submit written certification from the water company noting location of the existing fire hydrant and the existing water system is capable of delivering 500 GPM fire flow for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. If a water system currently does not exist, the applicant/developer shall be responsible to provide written certification that financial arrangements have beenmade to provide them. The re,cuired water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on the job site. Driveways over 150 feet in length shall have a turn around' at the second unit, capable of accoaa:~odating fire apparatus. Any secondunit placed more than 150 feet from any public right-of- way shall be required to provide an all-weather access for emergency vehicles. Access shall not have an up or down grade of more than !5%. Access will not be less than 12 feet in width and will have a vertical clearance of 13'6" Access will be free of sharp confined turns. Access will be designed to withstand the weight of any type of emergency vehicle. Access will have a turning radius of 45 feet capable of accommodating fire apparatus. FIRE PREVEN~ON DIVISION ~ RIVERSIDE OF~CE PLANNING SECTION ~ INDIO OFFICE 37~ 12th St~t, Riv~ide. CA 92501 79-733 Count~ Club D~ve, Suitu F, lndio, CA 92201 (909) 275~7~ · FAX (909) 369-74~1 (619) 863-8886 * FAX (6 19) 863-7072 All buildings shall be constructed with fire retardant roofing material as described in Section 3203 of the UniformBuilding Code. Any wood shingles or shakes shall be a Class "B" rating and shall be approved by the fire Department prior to installation. Street address shall be posted, in a visible location, minimum 4 inches in height, on the street side of the building with a contrasting background. Prior to 'the issuance of building permits, the developer shall deposit, with the City of Temecula, the sum of $400.00 per unit mitigation for fire protection impacts. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Department Planning and engineering section. RAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner Laura Cabral Fire Safety Specialist ATTACHMENT NO. 3 DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 94- R:\S~qTAFF'RPT~I79PA93.CC2 1/3/94 kib '] 5 ATrACttlVtnNT NO. 3 ORDINANCE NO. 94- AN'ORDINANCE OF TIff. CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF TII~!ECULA, AMk'INDING SECTION NO. 18.28.A.C.(10) OF ORDINANCE NO. 348 PERTAINING TO THt TYPE OF PAVING MATERIAL REQUIREu FOR ACCESS TO SECOND DWELLING UNITS TIff. CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. City Ordinance No. 90-04 adopted by reference certain portions Of the Non- Codified Riverside County Ordinances, including Ordinance No. 348. Section 18.28.a.c.(10) of Ordinance No. 348 is hereby amended to read as follows: (10) Any second unit placed more than 150 feet from a public right-of-way shall be required to provide all-weather access for emergency vehicles from a publicly maintained mad. Asphaltic paving is required for all-weather access; however, this requirement may be waived if all of the following conditions are met: A so~s report (prepared by a licensed soil or civil engineer) is submitted to the Department of Public Works for approval. The report shah determine the stability of the soils at the project site and contain recommendations for alternative material types and any associated drainage facilities that will support a 30,000 pound emergency vehicle. The applicant records a waiver, releasing the City of Temecula of any liability in the event that emergency vehicles cannot utilize the drive lane. Ce The City of Temecula will not accept or maintain the roadway until it has been improved to the City of Temecula Standards as identified in the Circulation Element of the General Plan. Section 2. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance is severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shah hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this ordinance to be invalid, such decisions shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 3. Notice of Adoption. Within 10 days after the adoption hereof, the City Clerk of the City of Temecula shah certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be posted in at least three public places in the City. Section 4. Taking Effect. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its adoption. R:~S\STAFFRFI~I79PA93.CC2 1/3/94 Idb I 6 PASSE1), APPROVED AND ADOPTED this __ day of ,199_. RON ROBERTS MAYOR ATTBST: June S. Greek, City Clerk STATE OF CALH~ORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMF~) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 94--- was duly introduced and placed upon its fLrSt reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of , 199_, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed a regular meeting of the City Council on the __th day of __, 1994 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCH.M]IMBERS: COUNCH~MEMBERS: COUNCH,MEMBERS: APPROV~',r. AS TO FORM: June S. Greek, City Clerk Scott F.Field City Attorney R:\S\STAFFRFr%I79PA93.CC2 1/3/94 klb ] 7 ITEM NO. 19 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council City Clerk January 11, 1993 Planning Commission Appointment APPROE~~( CITY ATTORN FINANCE OFFI RECOMMENDATION: Review the Ad-Hoc Committee recommendations and appoint one applicant to fill an unexpired term (ending June 4, 1994) on the Temecula Planning Commission. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to Council's adopted policy and procedure for making appointments and re-appointments, the term of Commissioner Dennis Chiniaeff, who resigned, was advertised in two local newspapers of general circulation. The applications received were forwarded to the Council's Ad-Hoc committee members for the Planning Commission, and Councilmembers Parks and Mu~oz have submitted the following recommendations: Councilmember Parks recommends the appointment of Rick Soltysiak. Councilmember Mu~oz recommends the appoinment of Arthur W. Salyer. Attached are copies of the applications which were received by the filing deadline of May 4, 1993. ATTACHMENTS: Copies of Applications for Appointment CITY OF TEMECULA APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSION Qudiftatiet Requirement: Realdam of City of TeNcub COMMISSION ON WHICH YOUWISH TO SERVE: Planning Commission NAME: Rich bol'uysia~ ADDRESS: 30519 Wailea Court YEARSRESIDENT OF TEMECULA: 7 HOME PHONE: WORK PHONE: 676-1470 676-1470 OCCUPATION: ' Civil Engineering Consultant EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: BS/CE Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin - 1979 Registered Civil Engineer, State of California - 1983 LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE: Temecula and Murrieta Coordinating Committee since 1991 ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, service): Murrieta Chamber of Commerce/Temecula-Murrieta Economic Development Corporation BRIEFLY ,STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC IUse additional paper ~ necessary): See Attached I understand that arty or dl kdo,,, ti~ on this form may be verified. I curtsam to the release of this PLEASE NOTE: Applications will be kept on file for cormiderrdon of future vacancies. Retum to: City Clerk's Office, 43174 Business Park Drive, Ta.,acula, CA 92390 (714) 694-1989 2/forms/COM-O01 DESIRE TO SERVE ON PLANNING COMMISSION I consider myself fortunate to have lived and worked in the Temecula area since 1986. During these past seven years my family and I have established both professional and social roots within the community. During this period I have also developed a sense of civic pride and would be honored to serve on the Planning Commission and assist in making decisions which play a role in shaping our city's future. Serving on the Planning Commission would provide me the opportunity to contribute back to the community. My professional background qualifies me to make informed decisions on complex development issues the Commission often faces. I believe well planned and organized growth are essential elements to ensuring the future success of our young city. OUALIFICATIONS TO SRRVE ON PT.ANNING COMMISSION My professional background, centered around civil engineering, ranges from experience as a County Civil Engineer, to Director of Engineering in a consulting firm, to Project Manager in a land development company. Currently I am the sole proprietor of my own consulting firm. With previous experience as both a consultant and project manager in land development; I have addressed planning commissions, city councils, and county boards of supervisors on many applications for land development. I have extensive experience in the overall land development process from entitlements to construction. Having worked with all the local servicing agencies on many projects, I also understand local agency project requirements and how they relate to the land division phase in an effort to ensure necessary infrastructure to adequately support the individual project demands. My professional experiences with property within the Temecula city limits all occurred prior to city incorporation. Additionally, all my current professional service contracts are either capital improvement projects with the City of Murrieta, or County of Riverside, or involve private development outside the City of Temecula. Therefore, I am also able to serve with no foreseeable conflicts of interest. CITY OF TEMECULA APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMIS~I ~N Qualification ReQuirement: Resident of City of Temecula COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: NAME: 't~r'Fkul' uJ. ADDRESS: HOME PHONE: OCCUPATION: EMPL O ~ERI ADDRESS : EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA: ~ ~///~_ WORK PHONE 3'o LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE: ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, service): BRIEFLY STA~ WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paper H I understand that any or all information on this form may be verifmd. I c~nsent to the release of this P~Lr~c'.~2~pliCat~s w ' ~ pt on/lie for consi'~tion ~f fitture vacancies. Return to: City Clerk's Office, 4317~~elss Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92390 (714) 694-1989 2/forms/COM-O01 Arthur W. Salyer I feel that I am capable of serving the City of Temecula on the Planning Commission for the following reasons: EDUCATION I have an undergraduate degree in engineering. This Will allow me to understand the technical complexities of plans. zone changes, and technical information utilized. I also have Masters Degree in Business Administration. This will allow me to better understand the business aspects of the various proposals. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE I have 20 years of increasingly levels of experience in industry. I have built and operated a number of factories in various parts of the country. I understand what it takes to be successful in business. Managing factories in small and large towns has allowed me to truly understand the need of balance between commercial growth and the quality of community life. I understand the need for balance between commercial and housing development. I understand the need to provide both housing opportunities for all parts community irregardless of personal financial resources. A key element to running a successful manufacturing operations is long and short range planning. These skills will help me to understand and effectively deal with the complexities of community planning. INDEPENDENCE I am not affiliated with any potential special interest group in the community. My business affiliations are all ~n Les Angeles County. The only property I own or intend to own in the Temecula area is my personal home. This will allow me to be true independent in decision making. I can work with all of the factions incorporating them into an effective community plan. My lack of active' affiliations in other community groups will allow to commit the time to the Planning Commission. COMMITMENT TO THE COMMUNITY I have lived in Temecula for 3 1/2 years. I have three children. I am committed to insuring that the quality of our community continues. PERSONAL PHILOSOPHY I believe in the value of balance in planning. We need to balance the needs of all the factions in the community: Agriculture, Commercial, Industrial, Government, and Housing. Each of these factions need to have a well planned and understood role in community planning for our area to grow strong.and secure. No single faction can be allowed to dominate the planning strategy. All must be integrated. It is t'he function of the Planning Commission to represent all of the members of our community fairly. Good long term planning is essential to maintain the prosperity and life style of the community. Thank you for y.,o~r consideration. Arthur W. Sa~'yer Ouadifw, ation Requbs,,.e~st: lice|dent of City of Temecula COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: PLANNING NAME: RON WALTON ADDRESS: 30075 YNF.,Z ROAD TE2~CU~, CA HOME PHONE: 694-0324 OCCUPATION: RESTAURANTEUR AND REAL ESTATE BROKER EMPLOYER/ADDRESS: TEXAS LIL'S , 28495 FRONT STREET, OLD TOWN TEMECUI.A EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: WORK PHONE: YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA: 4½ 677-3345 TWO YEAR COLLEGE LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE: OLD TOWN TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: IProfessiond, technical, community, service): RANCHO-TEMECULA-MURRIETA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS, CALIFORNIA RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION BRIEFLY. STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU T~T~Ec~3~IVELY FOLLOWED THE FORMATION AND GROWTH OF THE ~ITY TO DATE. I HAVE OBSERVED DIRECTION IN WHICH THE CITY SHOULD BE HEADING. SINCE .I OWN OR FRANCHISE OTHER BUSINESSES IN TORRANCE, FULLERTON WESTMINSTF~ NORCO, AND MORENO VALLEY, I HAVE HAD A LOT OF EXPERIENCE IN DEALING WI~H THOSE VARIGUS PLANNING COMMISSIONS AND THE PUBLIC AT LARGE. I HAVE UTMOST RESPECT AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE RESPONSIBILITY PLACED ON A PLANNING COMMISSIONER. I BELIEVE MY BUSINESS AND REAL ESTATE BACKGROUND WILL SERVE AS MY QUALIFICATION FOR THIS POSITION. ! unders.tand . ~ on th, is form my be vedfkid. I consent to 1he release of this ·'<,u, : Return to: City Clerk'$ Office, 43174 Busbess lark Drive, Te.,~e:c!a, CA 92390 (714) 694-1989 2/forme/COM-O01 CITY OF TEMECULA APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSION Qualiftation Requirement: COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: NAME: Timothy Jay Nillet ADDRESS: 45052 Corte Bella Donna 699-7133 'HOME PHONE: OCCUPATION: Attorney at law EMPLOYER/ADDRESS: 27349 Jefferson Avenue, EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: B.S Accounting - USC 1961 Llb. - USC '1964 Resident of City of Temecule Planning YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA: WORK PHONE: 699 - 9966 Suite 105 Temecula LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE: None ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG:lProfessional, technicel, community, sewice): State BAR, Riverside County BAR BRIEFLY STATEWHY YOUWISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIEDFOR THE POS~ION. BE SPE~FIC (Ueeadd~nal paper ~ necessa~): I have a personal interest in good planning. I would enjoy being involved with the planning process and having an ability Having practiced real estate law for r I believe I would bring another dimension to the Planning Commission as it is presently configureC. CITY OF TEMECULA APPUCATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSIC Qualification Requiremere: Re,lent of City of TeNcub COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: NAME: Lorin D. Phipps ADDRESS: 34670 Capitol Street HOME PHONE?Cmocula' C-lif_ 92j92 (909) 699-9810 OCCUPATION: Planning Commission YEARS RESIDENT 4½ OF TEMECULA: WORK PHONE: (909)694-4128 Real estate salesman and General Contractor EMPLOYER/ADDRESS: 27715 Jefferson Ave. Suite 113 Temecula, Ca. 92590 EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: B.A. degree PoliticalScience LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE: N/~, ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (l~ofessionel, technical, community, seNice): ~.C.A _ m,O e. - O.N.P.R.A. - Chri~t's Church BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPE~RC (UM edd~ion~ laHr ff necesssW): I am a native born Californian who has resided in California on a permanent basis. I have seen the development of many cities, being involved in the construction business for the past 31 years. I plan to live the balance of my life in Temecula. I Know how important planning decisions are in the future development of the character and living environment of a city. I believe I can provide an educated and professional approach that will help the majority of our residents have a fine city in which to live for many years to come. lunde~tend ~s~yordlbfommtao~o, ffib b~meybewe~Fmd. l~e~t~the~esse ~ ~b information for publicity os~s. SE NO will be conskieratimt of future vBcancies. Retum to: City Clerk's Office, 43174 !kebe~ Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92390 (714) 694-1989 2/fom~lCOM-O01 CITY OF TEMECULA APPUCATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSIO I Qualification Requirement: COMMISSI~:)~ ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: NAME: ADDRESS: HOME PHONE: Resident of City of Temecule YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA: WORK PHONE: ~,f-~- ,.,";e,. Z" ~ OCCUPATION: EMPLOYER/ADDRESS: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE: ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (l~ofessional, technical, community, service): BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMlISION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paper if I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for publicity purposes. ~'N~f%~l,% SIGNATURE: ~ ~,~,,~-,\ DATE: ,' [--Z- ~ / 2/forme/COM-O01 CITY OF TEMECULA APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSI(~~, Oualif~,atjon Requirement: rlesidt:~t of City of Teacub COMMISSION ~N V~IICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: NAME: ~.' :~c,,/L ~. 2i~c-~ .^ _~. HOME PHONE: ~J ~, ~- ~1 / YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA: WORK PHONE: OCCUPATION: ~e T/'t{ d ~: e~'/'~ C. ro ,,:., ,.z 2e //e/,t:~ c_l,L L: o ~:::~, u2.? y~, ~. ,.fev3 y ,.r t_' EMPLOYER!~kDDRESS: A//'~ o EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: ,~", 11 ~r,_J~ ~ ~.. y~ ~. - - LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITFEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE: ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: IProf, eeaional, technical, community, serviceh BRIEFLY STATE WHY ~;3~LI WISH TO SERVE ON T N, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE S~CIFIC IUse additional paper if information for publicity purposes. -- 6 (714) 694-1989 2/foffns/COM-O01 CITY OF TEMECULA APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSION Qualification Requirement: ResMent of City of Temecub COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: NAME: ADDRESS: Chris Martinelli 30255 Corte Cantania HOME PHONE: 909-694-0853 OCCUPATION: part-time marketing EMPLOYER/ADDRESS: " Analytic Artistry Inc. 30255 EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA: Temecula CA 92591 WORK PHONE: 9n9-695-1007 co-ordinator for an engineering software Corte Cantania Temecula CA 92591 CO. Bachelor's Degree in Business Administration, CSULB Graduate of the Realtors' Institute. GRI designation LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE: Get A Grip Committee-1993 Traffic Subcommitte of General Plan, 1992-3 ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: IProfessional. tech, ical. community. service): Chairman, Temecula Neighborhood Watch ~ Community Partnership-anti-drug// BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON 1'HIS COMMISSION, AND WHY VOsubstance BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paper abuse necessaW): Please see attached sheet mmittee I understand that any or all infoffnation on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this · ' r ic, purposes.DATE Return to: City Cterk's Office, 43174 Business Perk Drive, Temecula, CA 92390 {714) 694-1989 2/fonl~e/COIV~X) l June Greek City Clerk, City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula Ca 92591 11/17/93 Dear Ms. Greek, Enclosed is my application for a position on the.Planning Commis- sion. I believe that I am qualified for this position because of my educational, business, and personal credentials. In 1982 I gradu- ated (with honors) from California State University at Long Beach with a bachelor's degree in business administration. I have taken numerous courses in law, contracts, management, group dynamics, real estate, economics, and the like. My past experience as a real estate agent gives insight into land use issues. As a co- owner of a small corporation in this city, I am aware of many of the economic issues that businesses face. Before moving to Temecula in late 1990, my family studied all of Southern California, looking for that ideal mix of demographics, "community spirit", economic potential, and climate. We are happy we chose the city of Temecula and plan to live here for many many years. I want to serve on the Planning Commission be- cause I care about the city and want to make a contribution to its future. I am very active in the community and have artended many differ- ent commission and city council meetings and thus have an under- standing of how the city "works." Since I have no children living at home, and am self-employed, I am able and willing to devote the twelve to fifteen hours per meeting to read, research, and visit the sites as required to perform my duties. I will listen to all input and try to make informed decisions. Best regards, Chris Martinelli cc: City Council Members Planning Commission Members ITEM 20 FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: June S. Greek, City Clerk DATE: January 11, 1994 SUBJECT: Ordinance Adopting Temecula Municipal Code RECOMMENDATION: 1. Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ADOPTING THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE Direct the City Clerk to schedule a public hearing to be held on January 25, 1994 which includes consideration of the adoption of the Temecula Municipal Code and the following secondary codes: C® Ee G. H. Riverside County Ordinances adopted by reference; Uniform BuildinQ Code, 1991 Edition with appendices in California State Amendments. Uniform BuildinQ Codes Standards, 1991 Edition Uniform Mechanical Code 1991 Edition, with appendices in California State Amendments. Uniform Plumbino Code, 1991 Edition, with appendices in California State Amendments. Uniform Administrative Code, 1991 Edition. Uniform Code for the Abatement of Danoerous Buildinas, 1991 Edition. Uniform Housing Code, 1991 Edition; and Uniform Swimmine Pools. SPa and Hot Tub Code, 1991 Edition BACKGROUND: The City Clerk, working with the City Attorney's office and the 'firm of Book Publishing Company of Seattle, Washington has completed the task of editing, compiling and publishing the permanent and general ordinances of the City of Temecula in a document R:~Oe~ikrpt%mufdcede 1 AGENDA REPORT - Adoption of Municipal Code January 11, 1994 Page 2. to be known as the Temecula Municipal Code. This process has resulted in a single loose-leaf reference book which sets forth the existing body of law in chapter fashion. Government Code Section 50022.6 requires that true and correct copies of the Codes to be adopted by reference be available at least 15 days prior to a public hearing to consider adoption of the Ordinance. The required advertising has been placed, to meet the 15 day publication requirements, therefore the public hearing as required by the code and the second reading can accomplished at the meeting of January 25, 1994. After adoption of the Municipal Code, all future City ordinances will be forwarded to Book Publishing Company who will continue with the compilation and who will issue annual or semi-annual supplements which can be inserted into the code book binders. These supplements will also include revised index pages. JSG R:~eende.retVnunk:ele 2 ORDINANCE NO. 94- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ADOPTING THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE. WHEREAS, the City of Temecula has contracted with Book Publishing Company (BPC), Seattle, Washington to compile, edit and publish a codification of the permanent and general ordinances of the City of Temecula; and WHEREAS, there is now, on file in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection, one copy of a document en~~ed Temecula Municipal Code;" THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Adoption There is hereby adopted the "Temecula Municipal Code," as compiled, edited and published by BPC. Section 2. Title-Citation-Reference This code shall be known as the Temecula Municipal Code and it shall be sufficient to refer to said code as the "Temecula Municipal Code" in any prosecution for the violation of any provision thereof or in any proceeding at law or equity. It shall be sufficient to designate any ordinance adding to, amending, correcting or repealing all or any part or portion thereof as an addition to, amendment to, correction or repeal of the Temecula Municipal Code. Further reference may be had to the rifles, chapters, sections and subsections of the Temeeula Municipal Code and such references shall apply to that numbered rifle, chapter, section or subsection as it appears in the code. Section 3. Reference Applies to All Amendments. Whenever a reference to this code as the "-Temecula Municipal Code" or to any portion thereof, or to any ordinance of the City of Temecula, codified herein, the reference shall apply to all amendments, corrections and additions heretofore, now or hereafter made. Section 4. Title. Chapter and Section Headings. Title, chapter and section headings contained herein shall not be deemed to govern, limit, modify or in any manner affect the scope, meaning or intent of the provisions of any rifle, chapter or section hereof. Section 5. Reference to Specific Ordinances. The provisions of this code shall not in any manner affect matters of record which refer to, or are otherwise connected with ordinances which are therein specifically designated by number or otherwise and which are included within the code, but such reference shall be construed to apply to the corresponding provisions contained within this code. 5\ords\60 I Section 6. Ordinances l~.~edvl Prior to Adoption of the Code. The last ordinance inchded in this code was Ordinance93-16 passed August 24, 1993. The following ordinances, passed subsequent to Ordinance 93-16, but prior to adoption of this code, are hereby adopted and made a pan of this Code: Ordinances 93-17, 93-18, 93-19, 93-20 and 93-21. Section 7. ~ffect of Code on Past Actions and Obligations. The adoption of this code does not affect prosecutions for ordinance viohtions committed prior to the effective date of this code, does not waive any fee or penalty due and unpaid on the effective date of this code, and does not affect the validity of any bond or cash deposit posted, filed or deposited pursuant to the requirements of any ordinance. Section 8. ConstitutionaiRy. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this code is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this code. Section 9. Taking Effect. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its adoption. PASSED, APPROVEI~ AND ADOPTED this day of ,1994. ATTEST: , Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] 5~ds~60 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 94- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of January, 1994, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and pa~sed a regular meeting of the City Council. on the day of January, 1994 by the following roll call vote: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk 5~orda~O 3 ITEM NO. 21 ITEM NO. 22 APPROVAL ~,~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER · CITY OF TEMECULA STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Attorney/City Manager Scott F. Field, City Attorney January 11, 1994 Paloma del Sol: Agreement Between KDRC, Inc. and City Regarding Acceptance of Park, Approval of Final Tract Map No. 24135-3 and Modification of Target Density for Planning Area 6 RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Agreement between Kemper Real Estate Development Company and the City of Temecula regarding Paloma del Sol. DISCUSSION: The proposed Agreement is intended to resolve three related disputes between the City and Kemper regarding Paloma del Sol. First, the Development Agreement for Paloma del Sol provides for the dedication and improvement of parks, paseos and open space to the City in lieu of parkland dedication pursuant to the City's Quimby Ordinance. In particular, the Development Agreement provided for the dedication and improvement of an 8 acre Park to the City at the intersection of Campanule and De Portola Ways. (During the final design phase of the Park, its size increased to 9.5 acres). The Park is now complete and ready for acceptance. However, Staff has delayed acceptance of the Park until an Assessment District 159 lien of $633,000 is removed from the property. Kemper has taken the position that the City should accept the Park subject to the lien. Second, Kemper applied to the City for final map approval of Tract Map No. 24135-3, located within Paloma del Sol. The Council continued this matter off calendar pending resolution of Paloma del Sol Park dispute. Kemper contends this action violates the Subdivision Map Act. Third, the Park is located in what was previously Planning Area 6 of the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan. Originally, PA-6 comprised 37.8 acres of land end had target density of 5'90 units or 15 dwelling units per acre. In December 8, 1992 when the Park was added, PA-6 was reduced to 29.8 acres, and the Park was added as PA-37. The target density for PA- AGENDA REPORT - Palores Del Sol Agreement January 11, 1994 Page 2 6 was also reduced to 492 units, which resulted in e maximum density of 16.5 dwelling units per acre. In the course of researching the Assessment District lien issue, it was discovered that PA- 6 actually comprises of 37.9 acres. Given this fact, City Staff and Kemper representatives have met and reached a resolution of these three disputes through the attached Agreement. Briefly, the terms of the Agreement are as follows: Kemper agrees to apply to Assessment District 159 to respread the assessment and remove the lien from the Park. Kemper agrees that all dedications to the City of park land and open space are to be free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, except those accepted by the City. Kemper will apply for an amendment to the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan to adjust the target density for PA-6 to reflect the newly found acreage. The City will process the amendment at no cost. The Specific Plan Amendment will adjust the maximum density for PA-6 to 590 units or 16.5 dwelling units per acre, whichever is less. While City Staff will process a Specific Plan amendment, there is no commitment that either the Planning Commission or the City Council will approve the Amendment. The City Council will approve Final Map No. 24135-3. Kemper shall waive any claims it may have concerning the City's initial decision not to approve the Final Map. FISCAL IMPACT: The Agreement relieves the City of any responsibility to assume the $633,000 Assessment District 159 lien in connection with acceptance of the Park. The cost of processing the Specific Plan Amendment is estimated to be $4,496.50. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement between Kemper and the City regarding Paloma del Sol. Paloma del Sol Specific Plan, Amendment Map No. 3, approved December 8, 1992. Paloma del Sol Specific Plan, Amendment Map No. 2, approved March 26, 1992. . A61~~ RI~ARDING PALOMA DXL SOL This Agreement regarding Paloma de1 Sol is entered into by and between the City of Tamsouls, m California municipal corporation ("City") and XDRC, Inc., a Californ~s corporation (NOwneT·) to be effec~ive on aanuary 11, 1994, with reference to the following~ A. Owner is the developer of a mixed use subdivision, commonly referred to and known as "Paloma.del Sol" approved by the City's Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 3 CaBpacific Plan') and incorporated into the ~mJndment and Restatement of Develo ant Agreement between City and Owner recorded with the Riverside County Recorder on February 18, 1993 as Document No. 62043 (eDevelolment Agreement"). B. The Specific Plan describes Planning Area 6 as including 29.8 gross acres. C. Located within the Specific Plan, Planning Area 37 is an 'S Acre Park" which is in fact a e9.5 Acre Park." The City has refused to accept the 9.5 Acre Park because the parkland is subject to an assessment lien imposed under Assessment District 159. D. Owner has filed with =he City Council of City ('*City Council") for &pproval Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135-3 ("Final)(ape) which is part of the Paloma del 2ol subdivision. On NoV.-m~-~ 23, 1994, the City Council at their regular meeting continued off agenda consideration of the Final Map. · . After conducting the final engineering calculations for the Specific Plan, the Owner's civil engineering consultant has certified that the correct and actual gross acreage for Planning Acre 6 should be 36.3 acres. This will. result in a difference cf an 6.5 acre increase in the acreage for the 8pecif~c Plan, Planning Area 6. F. tit and Owner wish to set forth in this Agreement the terms and conditions under whichz (1) the Assessment District 159 assessment lien encumbering the 9.5 Acre Park shall be removed and reapread; (2) the correct acreage and density shall be shown on the Specific Plan, Planning Area 6S end (3) the Final Map will be placed beck before the City Council for approval. ~ za'~tss 1. City agrees to accept the 8.5 Acre Park offered for dedication by Owner. Within ten (10) days of recording of the grant deed for the 9.5 Acre Park, Owner shall appl to Assessment District IS9 for removal of the ~ssessment D~strict lien from Planning Area 37. Owner shall suppor~ and not object to the removal of the axisSing assessment district lien on the Specific Pla~, Planning &r~a 37 and the raspreading of &ssessment DistriCt 159 over other planning Areas within ~he 2paCific Plan as determined by the Assessment District 159 Engineer pursuant to California Streets & Highways Code SS 8733, 8740.1 and 8740.2 and Government Code S 66493(2)(d). Following removal of the lien, Owner shall provide City with title insurance providing that fee title to the 9.5 Acre Park is vested with the City, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. 3. City shall place the Final Map on its January 1994, regular City Council meetin ageride for approval. Subject to City Council approval of the F~nal Nap, Owner waives any legal claims, including damages, it may have against the City in i o 4. City shall process, at no cost or fees to be paid by O~ner, an amendment to the Specific Plan to increase the maximum number of dwelling units permissible in the Specific Plan, Planning Area 6 to 590 dwellin units. The total density shall not in any event exceed the existing target density of 16.5 dwelling units par acre for Planning/tree 6, 5. The City staff shall recommend to the Planning Commission of city and to the City Council approval of an amendment to the Specific Plan as sac forth in this Agesmeet. 6. City has determined that the amendment to the Specific Plan as provided in this Agreement shall not require an amendment to the Development Agreement. The actions required by City and Owner pursuant to this Agreement shall be deemed "minor" clarifications to the Existing Development Approvals set forth in the Development Agreement. 7. Owner agrees that all dedications of parkland, greenbelts, slopes, passsos, and open space shall be transferred Co the City free and clear of all liens, taxes, assessments, and easements of record except for any easements acceptable to City in City's sole discretion. In connection with all such dedications, Ovne~ shall provide City with title insurance. s. City and Ovner u~derstand and agree Chat approval of the amendment Co the Specific Plan ~s a discretionar~ decision vhich can only be made following notice and public hearing. The parties acknowledge that nothing contained In t~is Agreement shall be construed as a procommitment on the part oZ the City Planning Comaission or the City Council to approve any amendment to the Specific Plan. Non-discretionar~ actions of the City and the City a~ Ovne~. CITY OF TN(ECUI~ ATTBST$ By:_ Ron RoberOs Mayor By:. June S. Greek City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By= ~cott F. Field City Attorney NOWNER~ KDRC, INC., a California corporation By~ By:. CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO.: EXHIBIT: F P.C. DATE: Change of Zone No. 18, Specffic Plan No. 219, Amended No. 2 SPECIFIC PLAN REVISION MAP January 27, 1992 CITY OF TEMECULA ROADWAY LANDSCAPE TREATMENT P 36 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL 2.5 AC. POTENTIAL ACCESS POINT CASE NO.: EXHIBIT: C P.C. DATE: Change of Zone No. 18, Specific Plan No. 219, Amended No, SPECIFIC PLAN AREA January 27, 1992 ITEM NO. 23 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICEI~_ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Council/City Manager /r~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer January 11, 1994 SUBJECT: Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135-3 PREPARED B~~Jim D. Faul, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Finel Vesting Tract Map No. 24135-3 subject to the Conditions of Approval. BACKGROUND: Tract No. 24135 was originally submitted to Riverside County Planning Department on Jahuary 3, 1989. The Tentative Vesting Tract Map was approved by the Board of Supervisors on May 23, 1989. Final Vesting Tract No. 24135-3 contains ninety-seven (97) residential lots and six (6) open space lots within 25.83 gross acres. The tract is located on the southeast corner of Margarita Road and Santiago Road. This tract is part of the Meadows Specific Plan (SP 219) and Development Agreement No. 4. The applicant is KRDC, Inc. The following fees have been paid for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135-3: Signal Mitigation Fee Fire Mitigation Fee Stephen's K-Rat Fee $14,550.00 38,800.00 50,368.50 The following fees have been deferred for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135-3: Public Facilities Fee Flood Control Fee (ADP) Due prior to Building Permit N/A, per RCFCD letter dated 9-17-93 -1- pwOb"~egdrpt~94%0111%24135-3.egn 010494 The requirement of Quimby Fees (park fees) was to be satisfied pursuant to the Amended and Restated Development Agreement between the City of Temecula and KRDC, Inc. (formerly Bedford Development Company) end Mesa Homes, which became effective on January 31, 1992. Among other things, this Development Agreement provides for the granting of several improved parks to the City. The first park area to be granted to the City is located in the southeast portion of Paloma Del Sol. The park improvements are completed and the City would be in a position to accept the improvements, except for the fact that a dispute has arisen concerning the allocation of an assessment lien under Assessment District 159 to the site. This dispute is set forth in detail in the attached correspondence. Staff is hopeful that this dispute can be resolved in the next month. Staff is not recommending at this time that the recordation of this map be delayed as a result of this dispute. Final Vesting Tract No. 24135-3 was granted an extension of time by the "Amendment and Restatement of Development Agreement - Paloma Del Sol" recorded February 18, 1993. The following bonds have been posted for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135-3: Faithful Labor & Subdivision Performance Material Monument Street and Drainage Water Sewer Survey Monuments $308,000 $154,000 $69,500 $34,750 $70,000 $35,000 635,500 FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Development Fee Checklist Location Map Copy of Map Conditions of Approval Fees and Securities Report Letter of October 28, 1993, from Scott F. Field, City Attorney to Bryan Norren, KRDC Letter to Bryan Noreen to David Dixon, City Manager, dated November 4, 1993 -2- p~rpt%94~011 l~24135-3.egn 010494 CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST Final Vestina Tract MaD No. 94135-3 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. F~ Habitat Conservation Plan (K-Rat) Parks and Recreation (Quimby Fees) Public Facility (Traffic Mitigation) Public Facility (Traffic Signal Mitigation) Public Facility (Library) Fire Protection Flood Control (ADP) Condition of Aooroval Condition No. 26.b See Staff Report N/A See Road Department Letter Dated 4/17/89, Item 22 N/A See Fire Department Letter Dated 2/24~89 Condition No. 14 N/A per RCFCD letter dated 9-17-93 -3- pwOStalldept~4%011 l~24135-3.mgn 010494 6 f:Of~tati~ 'rY MAP A[DT TO SCALE I,I, . DATE: June 8, 1989. RiVErsiDE COUrt;,u PLAnnin DEPARaTIEn ' TO: Surveyor Road Butldtng &.Safety Flood Co trol Health Fire-Protection RE: TENTATIVE VESTING TRACT NAP NO, 24135 Amd. $PEClF/C PLANS TEAN The ltverstde County Board of Superfisors has taken the following actton on the above referenced tentative vesttn9 map: ,, APPROVED tentative map subject to the attached conditions (no watver request $mbelttBI). DBIIED tentative mp based on the attached findings. APPROYED tentative map subject to attached conditions and DENIED request for waiver of the final map. APPROY~ tentargive' map and APPROVED request for vatvet of the ftnal map. APPROVED Extension of Ttme to previously approved conditions. . subject to 811 APPROYED Extension of Ttme to previously approved conditions. DEKI£D ExtensJon of Ttme ........................................... subject to all APPROVEDwtthdrawal of tentative mp. ,. APPROYED Mtnor Change to revtse originally "approved (attached). conditions as shown , DENlED nquest for MInor Change. II~PROV~D Rlnor Cbl;geEt~Dvatve the ftnal map. NL Very truly yours, En' lVERSIDE COUIfiT PLANNING DEPARTMENT E~./~j~loger $, $treeter, Planntng Dtrector JT . .~,~- ~FI~~' RS ... Ron Goldman - Principal Planner 4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 (714) 787-6181 46-~209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304 INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201 (619) 342-8277 ,// Hay 15. 1989 · i%·% D. q- 6. D~ · 0 *'4E:S'ZZNG =IRAC= leO. 24131 Md. No. I - Va:STZa~ ~- NO 24132 3au::t. No. 2 - VE:STZNG ~ NO. 24133 Jeff. No I- *VE:STING '31RACT NO. 24134 Md~ No. I - *VEb*'I'Z~ ~ACT NO. 24135 and. No. I - *V~STZNG ~ NO. 24136Nad. No. 1-*VE:STING=I~CT NO. 24137 a~d. No. I - Bedford Properties - Supervisorial District I - Pancho California Area - 698.1 Acres '2,519 lc~s - Sche~ne A- SP Zoning ~/XZIVE AND FTvR the above men~icrmd _P~ee acted cfi by the Planning Ga,,assicm cfi ~ril 12, 1989. ~E P~ CII44ISSICIq: A~C~xw ~ae Negati,a Declaration for ~a,~x~ ~se~ ~s. 3~33, 3~70, 33383, 33469, 3~, 33413, ~. 3~14 ~ ~ ~ ~~i~ ~t ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ a si~fi~t RSS: CO: gs AGENDA NO. 11A V~ NO'S 24131, 24132 24133, 24134, 24135, 24136 24137 April 19, 1989 Page 2 ~ V~STZNG ~ ~ NO 24131/~d. No. 1, subject to the attached cuadit/u~ ~ ~ m ~ f~~ ~ ~~t~ ~ ~ P~ ~,~si~ ~ ~ ~ril ~, 19891 ~, APENED %~'ZING =~23LTZVE =RACT NO. 24132/N~. No. 1, subject to the a=tached ccr~it_ic~s and based cm the find/rigs and conclusions incorporated in the Planning Ccmmiss~ minutes dated April 12, 1989; and, AFFRCNED VESTIM3 =~EATIVE TRACT NO. 24133 J~d. No. 2, subject to the attached conditions and based m the fiDa~.ngs and ccnclus=ons incorporated in the Planning C~assicm minutes dated April 12, 1989; and, APPR3U~) %~STING ~ E NO. 24134 J~d No. 1 subject to the attached ccmditicrm and based cm the findings and conclusions incorporated in the Plmming C~,.{ssicm minutes dated April 12, 1989; and, APPENED VESTING =2NZRT/VE ~RACT NO. 24135 3i~ No. 1, subject to the attached ccm~iitic~s a~ based cm the findings and ccmclus~ons incozp~mted in the Planning ~sim minutes dated April 12, 1989; and, APPEND) VESTING ~ =K~CT NO. 24136 3~d No. 1, ~ubject to the attached conditions and based c~ the findings and c~nclus~ons 1989; and, / RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING CO~ISSION FLTNUTES APRIL 12, 1989 (AGENDA ITEM 5-4 - Reel 1025, Std~ 1 and 2 - Tapes No. 3a, *3B, 4A) VESTING TRACT HAP NO. 24131 - EA 33433 - Bedford Properties - Rancho California Area -Ftrst Supervisortel Dtstrict - easterly of Hargartta Rd, southerly of Pauha Rd , 441 lots - 105.4+ acres - SP Zone - Schedule A with VESTING TRACT HAP NO. 24132 - EA 33470 - 223 lots - 90.2+ acres - SP Zone - Schedule A and VESTING TRACT HAP NO. 24133 - EA 33383 - 693 lots - 163.7+ acres - SP. Zone - Schedule A and VESTING TRACT RAP NO. 24134 - EA 33469 - 310 ]ors - 91.2+ acres - SP Zone - Schedule A and VESTING TRACT HAP NO. 24135 - EA 33434 - 325 lots - 83.5+ acres - SP Zone - Schedule A and VESTING TRACT IMP NO. 24136 - EA 33413 - 400 lots - SF§.8~ acres - SP Zone Schedule A and VESTING TRACT FlAP O. 24137 - EA 33414 - 147 lots - 64.3+ acres - SP Zone - Schedule A Heartngs ere opened at 3:30 p.m. and were closed at 4:19 p.m. STAFF IECOI~!ENDATION: Adoptlon of the Negattve Declaration for EA Nos. 33433, 33470, 33383, 33469, 33434, 33413, and 33414 and approval of Testtng Tentative Tract Nos. 24131 Amended No. 1, 24132 Amended No. 2, 24133 Amnded No. 1, 24134 Amended No. 1, 24135 Amended No. 1, 24136 Amended No. 1, and 24137 Amended No. 1 based on the ftndtngs and conclusions 11sted tn the staff report. Staff advtsed that the vesttrig tracts are to Implement the western portton of The Neadows Spectftc Plan (SP 119), whtch ts located east of Hargartta Road, west of Butterfield Stage Road, north of Highway 79 and south of Pauba Road. The proposal ts to subdivide approximately 698.1 acres tnto 2,529 residential lots and 100 open space lots/school sttes. Zontng on stte ts SP. Surrounding zontng ts SP, R-R, R-A, R-a-2~, R-A-5, A-1-10 and C-P-S. The site conslsts of rolllng terratn except for the southern portton whtch ts flat, and ts vacant wtth the exception of a portton of Vesttng Tract 24137, which has some percolatton ponds. The stte had been used for dr,~ farmtrig where topography permitted. The stte ts located near other adopted Spectftc Plans such as Vat1 Ranch (SP 223) and Redhawk (SP 217) to the south, as well as approved tracts to the east. The propose development conforms with the residential densities and destgn standards of the speclftc plan. Vesttrig Tract 24131 wt11 dtvtde 105.4 acres tnto 440 stngle faetly lots, with 13 open space lots, and was ended for a rot nor redestgn of the tract to facilitate circulation. Vesttag Tract 24132, . t 1 Mended No. 2 proposes to dtvtde 30.2 acres tnto 214 s ngle famtly lots with 1 open space lots Including an elementaPJ and Juntor htgh school stte. The tssue of slope stability was a *concern of all the tracts and ms revtewed by the County Geologist. Vesttrig Tract 24133 proposes to d~vtde 163.7 acres into 693 stngle famtly lots and 23 open space lots and has an extensive paseo system ~htch 11nks to an acttve recreation area. The Fire Department was concerned about Internal-circulation and Norled tO avotd c~tt ng through the paseo ar~a. The cross secttbns of the greenbelt/paseo area Is on ftle. Vesting Tract 24134 proposes to dtvtde 91.2 acres tnto 311 stngle famtly lots and 19 open space lots, whtch tncluded a 2.5 acre lot for a day care center. Vesttrig Tract Hap 24135 roposes to dtvtde 83.5 acres into 325 stngle famtly lots and 19 open space ~ots. Vesttng Tract Hap 24136 proposes to dtvtde 99.8 acres Into 400 41 t, RIVERSTDE COUNTY PLANNING COHN/SSZON HINUTES APRIL 12, ' 1989 stngle famtly lots and 8 open space lots. There ts a htstortc stte on this map and on Tract 24137 and a letter on thts stte was Incorporated ~lthtn the staff report. All concerns have been resolved. Tract 24137 proposes to dirtale 64.3 acres tnto 146 stngle family lots, a 9,1 acre commercial lot and 7 open space lots, A liquefaction study was prepared for thts tract and was revtewed by the County Geologist to hts satisfaction. Staff modified the condtttons of approval as follows: CondtttonlB-e for Tracts 24133, 24134, 24135 and 24137: "Trash btns, loadtng areas and Incidental storage areas located tn recreation areas shall be located away and vtsually screened from surrounding areas wtth the use of block walls and landscaping." Condition 18-f amended to read "bike access to recreation areas." ConditiOn 21 to be replaced by standard language for the property owners association matntatnlng the common areas rather than the strict CSA requirements. Condftton 26-a shall be deleted stnce none of the tract areas are in the study area for the Stephens Kangaroo Rat or wtthtn the known occupied habitat. Condition 26-c should be modtfted to read: Prior to tssuance of bulldtng rather than gradtng pemtts. Condition 29 should be added to all the tracts, referring to the CEQA monitoring of the mitigation measures. Comtssloner Beadltng satd that there ts 100 acres etther for schcols or open space. She asked tf they took the school sttes out, how much open space would they have. Staff advised that there are 243 acres devoted to recreation and open space outstde of the school sttes. Commissioner Beadltng asked whether there was a provision for a clubhouse, and staff advised that there are plans for recreation centers wtthln the plan. Staff wtll receive plot plans for the open space areas. Lee Johnson, Road Department, advised that ttem No. 4 for Tract 24133 should be amended to read 4_J/66 tnstead of 44/66. TESTZNONY OF PROPONLqIT: F!tke Ryan, Bedford Properties, 27405 Ynez Road, Pancho California, said that they concur rlth the staff report end a11 conditions of approval except for one. He said-that the condition appears tn all the tracts. They would 11ke added to 1tern 16 of the Road Department letter dated Hatch 7, 1989 "or as approved by the Road Commissioner." FIr. Johnson concurred ~lth that proposed amendment. 42 RZVERS/DE COUNTY PLANNZNG COW4ZSSZON HZNUTES APRIL 12, 1989 TESTIHONY OF OPPONENTS': Fellx Probandt, P. O.Box 1150, Temecula, satd that all hls co,nents related to the tssue of wastewater disposal, tn particular, the Eastern Huntct al Hater Dtstrtct/Rancho California Eater Reclamation FactltV (hereafter called the Eastern Sewer Plant). He had hls assistant present a sertes of transparencies which Hr. Probandt used to Illustrate hts potnts. Hts residence ts located at 43789 Rendova Place. Hr. Probandt satd that the transparencies are generally of documents.~hat the Commissioners have already received, and he 8nphastzed the Information found tn those documents. Hr. Probandt satd that the conditions of approval tnclude a condition that the environmental assessment shall uttltze the evaluation of tmpacts addressed In the E/R prepared *for Spectftc Plan No. 219. Under "~mpacts" the Information was provided that the project wtll generate approximately 1.81 mt111on gallons per day average peak dry weather sewage flow, and that the peak dry weather sewage flow ts estimated to be 3.08 mt111on gallons per day to he treated by the Eastern Sewage Plant. Another document states that the stte 11es ~thtn the Jurisdictions of the Rancho California ~/ater Dtstrtct and the Eastern Nuntctpal Hater DIstrict. He satd that Eastern, not Rancho, wtll provtde sewer servtce. The San 53 letter has remarks whtch state that prtor to the first LDC, the attached requested lnfomation ts to be Introduced to the E.H.S. The Heaqth letter dated August 9, 1988 to the Rancho California Hater Dtstrtct discussed the "wtll service" letter. He noted that atyptcal response to a Health Department letter was "yes" to the questton of whether there was adequate capacity. Eastern Nuntctpal Hater Distrtct's response to a "wtll serve" letter has a statement that "servtce mtght be precluded by the San Dtego Ragton I~ater Quality Control Board." A second copy of a San 53 has the statement that sewer ma~ require off stte sewer facilities subject to the treatment plant capactty of the San Diego Raglone1 Hater Quallty Control Board. The San Dtego Hater Board's Order No. 88-94 had to do wtth discharge specifications and certaln difficulties Eastern was experiencing In discharging whtch was tn violation of the "basln plan" as well as capacity. Order No. 88-101 was tssued for a ttme schedule for the Eastern Nuntctpal Hater Dtstrtct to recttfy the problems, He satd because of the agreement wtth Camp Pendleton and the Rancho DIstrict, Eastern ts belng allowed three years to work out the violations, but they can only go to three m1111on a day, and tn order to be 'able to discharge three mt111on gallons, they rest comply vtth certatn report dates for the next three ~elrs. The report concludes that Eastern shall submit to the Regtonal Board on or before each compliance date a Report of Compliance or Noncompliance wtth each task. The last page was a table whtch Indicated that the tracts average peak sewage flow comes to 0.788 mt111on gallons a day (NGD). He potnted out that water ts Introduced to thts flow to dtlute tt. The monthly report..shows an average of 2,260 mtllton gallons by the end of February, rlth I maxtame of 2,423 I(GD. He said that under the present operating status of the Eastern Idatar DIstrict, there Is no reasonable assurance that Eastern ~11 be able to treat and discharge the wastewater flows comtng out of the sub;lect tracts for whtch environmental assessments are ~n question. 43 R:ZVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNTNG CO~TSSZON FIiNUTES APRTL 12~ 1989 Hr, Prohandt satd' that EIR 235 for $P 219 was defective because ~nfonnation that could not have been known at the time of the EIR was certified as complete, The San Dtego Regtona~ Board'Orders and the action by the Rancho California Board and the Pietines a]] took piece subsequent to the October 1988 Board of Superrlsors approval of the subject EIR, No negatJve declaration can be issued because there exists substantial evtdence that each project.or tract tn questton my have a significant effect on the environment, The revtew process presented was tn violation of due process and that the pertinent agenc,v (the Department of Hea~th) dtd not follow Its own ru~es tn the approval process. Comtsstoner Beadltng satd that what was basically betng satd ts that the plant ts at capactty now and thts project cannot be Included. Nr. Probendt said that Eastern ts tn violation of the bastn plan. The inter code of the State of California has a 11st of rules 'whtch allows any member of the publlc to protest an order of the Board. One of the procedures was to protest to the State 14ater Resources Board. He satd that by the ttme thts project ts butlt, he didn't belteve that he can be assured that the project wtll not be tn violation of the 3 NGD. Con~tsstoner Beadltng asked whose responsibility thts Is. Nr. Vtckers satd that Eastern Indicated that they had the capactty and would serve these tracts. Commissioner Beadlerig noted that from what Nr. Probandt ts saytrig. Eastern cannot provtde the capacity. Nr. Vtckers satd that that statement could be b su .tect to a dtspute by Eastern. They cannot stt tn Judgment of whether or not Eastern ts or ts not tn violation. That Issue would have to be heard tn San Dtego before the I~ater quallty Control Board down there. Idhat the developer has ts a letter from Eastern Nuntctpal saytng that there ts capacity. Fir. Vtckers advtsed that they should not be substituting thetr Judgment for either Eastern or the Hater Quallty Control Board over whether or not there ts capacity. Coff~tsstoner Purrlance 'satd that he dtd not belteve that thts was tn the purview of the Conznlsston. to check whether there are proper assurances from the proper agencies. However, tf the San D~ego RklQCB say that Eastern ts persisting tn violating the be$tn plan, tt would seem as tf the MICB has the power to tssue a cease and destst order whtch would prohlbtt them from allowtng more hookups or whatever other actlon they choose to take. Conznlssloner Bresson satd that there ts a Nello Roos tn that area, but he dtd not know ff part of that dtstrtct ms for the development of a sewage plant. He felt that Eastern has a obligation when they w~ote thetr letter saytrig that they have capecity, and the Comntsston has to constrict that Eastern w111 do It. Zf Eastern gets additional capact . there ts no problem; tf not, then Eastern and the developer wtll have a probream. The Commission has to go by what docmentatfon ts Fiven them. Nr. Probendt satd that he was alleglng that the developer cannot get capactty because of Eastern~s own statements. He satd that what he was trytrig to show RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COHHISSION MINUTES · APRIL 12, 1989 wtth the transparencies of the documents ~s that the statement from the Hea]th Departaent has · "yes* check for capacity, but that does not mean anything. lihat does mean mthtn9 ts the letter Eastern sent dated 12-19-BB which states that 'service might be precluded by IIQCB-SD.* Iqr. Prolandt said that if this project develops further, Eastern ~111 testtf that this ts not a btndtng comttment, and ts not a contract to serve. ~he potnt he ts saytrig ts that the developer cannot get a negattve declaration 4f there exists substantial evtdence that the project, tn thts case the tracts, wtll have a significant envtronment~] trapact. Therefore, he ms presenting the tnfomatton tn that con text. fir. Vtckers asked tf sewage was a part of Spactftc Plan 219 and E/R 235 and were mitigation measures a part of that. Staff advtsed that tt was. Vickers painted out that added to the conditions today were conditions regarding environmental monitoring and recording. Co~tsstoner Beadling said that she was concerned that the developer wtl] grade the land, then find that he cannot build. ithat they will end up wtth is land that has been disturbed and ts subject to eroston. Nr. Probandt satd that he moved onto his property after the Board approved the specific plan. He would have been at these hearings before this, had he moved tnto the area earller. He ts tr3ring to establish evtdence that these tracts my have a significant impact on the environment.in order to get thts problem resolved. Nr. Vlckers satd that the environmental ftndtngs tn the EZR address the issue of sewage and the mitigation of that problem. Ne noted that a condition was added today for monitoring and reporting, and advised that the development could be stopped at various stages tf tt is not at the right level. Con~ntsstoner Purrlance said that he dtd not belteve tt was the Commtsston's role to make the determination that Hr. Probandt wants. lihether or not the developer ts followtrig the requirements of the Ragtonal liater Quality Control is between the developer and that agency. Nr. Probandt re!terated that this is an environmental assessment that ts betng considered and the Commission cannot tssue a negative declaration under these circumstances based on substantial evtdence that thts project may affect the environment. Coantsstoner Purrlance advtsed that County Counsel ts saytng that the plan calls for these thtngs to be mitigated and that the conditions have been amended so the project ts *monitored. Therefore, the negattve.doclaratton ts perfectly legal, The hearing ms closed at 4:19 p,m. FZNDZNGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Seven Tentative Vesttrig Tract Nos. 24131, 24132, 24133, 24134, 24135, 24136 end 24137 have been sulmttted; the subject tracts enttrely vith~n adopted S dftc Plan llo. 219; the seven vesttng ere located been destgned to the devell:eopment tracts have standards of Adopted $pactftc Plan No. 219; Env!ronmental Assessment Nos. 33433, 33470, 33469, 33434, 33413, and 33414, based on the findings of Environmental lapact Report No. 235, prepared for Specific Plan No. 219, tndtcate that the envtromental trapacts can be avoided or mitigated to an acceptable level, except for cumulathe Air Quality ~mpacts, ~htch cannot be fully mitigated; a statement of Overriding Ftndtngs 45 R/YERSIDE COUNTY PLANNZNG COI~ISSXON HZNUTES APRZL 12, 1989 for cm~ulattve Air Quallty trapacts ms approved by the Board of Supervisors on October 4, 1988; and, Development Agreement No, 4 has been recorded for Speclflc Plan No, Zig, The proposed tracts conform to Spectftc Plan No. 219; conform to-the requirements of Ordinance Nos, 348 and 460; based on the environmental determination made tn Environmental Assessment Nos. 33433, 33470, 33383, 33469, 33434, 33413, and 33414, the subject vesttng tracts wtll not have a significant effect on the environment, wtth the exception of cumulative Air Qualtty trapacts whtch cannot be fully mitigated; and, the akovo r-'erenced Envtronmentaq Assessments tnclude the Statement. of Overriding Ftndtngs for cumulative Al'r Quallty 1rapacts approved by the Boar of Supervisors on October 4, 1988, therefore, the environmental trapacts have been mitigated to an acceptable level through pro~lect destgn and the conditions of approval. NOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Bresson, seconded by Commissioner Beadling and unanimously carried, the Con~ission adopted the Negative Declarations for EA Nos. 33433, 33470, 33383, 33469, 33434, 33413 and 33414 and approved Tentative Tracts No. 24131/mended No. 1, 24132 Amended No. 2, 24133 Amended No. 1, 24133 Amended No. 1, 24134/mended No. 1, 24135 Amended No. 1, 24136 Amended No, 1, and 24137 Amended No. 1 subject to the amended conditions of approval and based on the above findings and conclusions. In answer to Commissioner Bresson, Nr, Vtckers advised that on the previous item, the Development Agreement was in place. These are new vesting maps within the Specific Plan. 46 Zcming Area: Pancho California Supervisorial District: First E.A. Number: 33433, 334'70, 33383, 33469, 33434, 33413, 33414 Spec/fic Plan Sectice vesting Trac'c Nos.: 241313m~_n~ment No. 1 24132 J~en~ment No. 2 24133 ~mendment No. 1 24134 ~ No. 1 24135 .Amendment No. 1. 24136/~m~t No. 1 24137/~en~me~t No. 1 P~ CuauissiGn: 4-12-89 ~rJenda Ita~ No.: 5-4 C) C~ Applicant: Type of 1Rec/ue.~: 4. location: Jober~ Bein, W~ 11 ~ ~n Frost & Associates 5. E~as~ing Z~ne: To subdivide 698.1 acres into seven ~sting r ~v~5,~ (24131, 24132, 24133, 24c~~4132 24136, and 24137) 2,529 resident/al lo~s and 100 open space lots/school sites. The r~aCcs are located within ~he Meadows Specific P~n 0~o. 219). The site is in the S~ate Highway 79 of Sou=hwes~ern Riverside County. Specifically, the subject tracts are located eas~ of Margari=a Rd. and ~ of Butter~ield Stage Rd., 4q~ea{ately north of Highway 79, and south of Pauba SU.,.,,.,:,,d~4 ng Zc~.ng: SP, R-P~ R-~ R-A-21/2, R-A-5, A-1-10, C-P-S 7. Site Charac~cs: =he sate of the subjec~ tracts ~msis~s of ro~ ~ 4ng te~,ain ~ f~ ~ ~ ~m ~ ~ sate, ~ ~ ~t. '~ si~ ~ ~ ~ f~ ~ ~~. ~ ~ ~~ of ~~ ~ ~ a ~~ of V~ ~ 24~7, ~ of ~ si~e ~ Vesr./ng Tract: Nos. 24131 A,~Ua~:~'~ NO. 1 24132 j~mdedNo. 2 · 24133 Ja~nd,k,9 No. 1 24134~No. 1 24135/m~xk~No. 1 24136 ~mended 1io. 1 24137 ;~egJed No. I PacJe 2 8. Area Characterista. cs: e 10. T~nd DiviSiC~ Data: S~cific P~-.s, such as Vail Ranch (Specific Plan 223) and Paeawk (Specific Plan 217) to the Sou~h as w_ll as ~ tracts to the east. LAND USE: ~edSpecific Plan No. 219 ~Ct~~ING SIN~. FAM~.¥ ~ PLANNIN3 AREAS IDTS 24131Amd. No. I 105.4 24132Amd. No. 2 90.2 24133Amd. No. i 163.7 241342~xi. No. I 91.2 1 83.5 24136Amd. No. i 99.8 24137~. ~. I ~.3 15, 22 440 30, 31, 32 214 16, 19, 20, 21 693 18, 33, 34 311 8 400 1, 2-a 146 TO=ALS 698.1 Flood CaYcrol: 3-07-89 3-20-89 3-27-89 2-27-89 1-18-89 4-14-89 Oa~S2~CIAL LOTS/SCHOOL 1DTS SITES 0 13 0 11 0 23 0 19 0 ~D 0 8 i 7 2,529 I 100 See letters ~ated: Tra~c NO. 24132 A,,e'aa,r~zat No. 2 *Road DeFe~,L: 3-06-89 Bealth ~: 3-20-89 Flood Ccffcrol: 3-24-89 Fire DeFerSnine: 3-21-89 Building and Safety: 3-06-89 l~vised ~ Degc: 4-17-89 Vestin~ Tract Nos. 24131 Irataxied 14o. 1 24132~,-.,_y~No. 2 24133 ]mm'g:led 14o. 1 24134 :.dr_~%er.l 14o. 1 24135 ]mm'dmd 1~.. 1 24136 ]m,err. b'-t 14o. 1 24137 ,pme,rr'--4 14o. I Page 3 Tract No. 24133 auendaent No. I 3-06-89 2-27-89 3-27-89 2-24-89 3-06-89 4-17-89 Tract No. 24135/~nendment No. I M~lth DeparUuent: Flood Cor~rol: Fire Dep~ U~nt: Building and Safety: Revised 1:toad Dept..: 3-06-89 2-27-89 3-27-89 2-24-89 3-06-89 4-12-89 Tract No. 24134/~endaent No. I Flood Ooatrol: Building and Safety: 3-06-89 3-20-89 3-27-89 2-24-89 3-06-89 4-17-89 Tract No. 24136 A~endment No. I Health Del:z~'p-nt: Flood Cantrol: F~ ~ U.~t: ~~g ~d ~y: 3-06-89 2-27-89 3-27-89 2-24-89 3-06-89 4-12-89 Tract No. 24137 ]m~rKt~ent No. I M~th DeparUmnt: Flood Control: Building and Safety: County Geologist: ReviaedRoadZept.: 3-07-89 2-27-89 3-27-89 2-24-89 3-06-89 1-30-89 4-12-89 Seven Vesting Te~a~ve Tra~cs have been filed within adored ,~pec4~ic Plan No. 219 fibs Meadows). Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24131 ~c~x~es to divide 453 ~ m 105.4 acres. Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24132 will divide 214 ~ m 90.2 a~so In the iZarior of ~he Specific Plan, Vesting Tract No. 24133 mis~ of 716 of =be ~pec__4 ~4c Plan area, will divide 91.2 acres ~ 330 l~cs. Plan, incluc~s ~4' 3~f 99.8 acres ~ 408 lo~. Finally, Vet/rig Tract 14o. 24137, in ~he pTa.a of c ec44'ic adjace HiCk, my 79, to St_~f Report Vesting Tract Nos. 24131 ]Ben~ed No. 1 24132/~ended No. 2 24133/tinended No. 1 24134/~enc~dNo. 1 24135 a~.--..b~J No. 1 24136/~.--~ No. 1 24137 ~ No. I Page 4 Specific P/aa No. 219, adopted by the Board of Su~rvi~)rs c~ October 4, 1988, includes 5,611 dw~_~14~g units ~11389 acres. The seven tracts implement the western portia~ of the Specific Paan. EnTiromBntal Impact Report No. 235 assessed the full range of enviramental concerns associated with the Specific Plan. All identified potentis/impacts, except for cumulative effects cm air ~mlity, were reduced to an acceptable level throug~ mitigeticm ~-~=es inoorporBted into the project, oanditions of approval and project ~esign. =he envixam~ntal impact report is the basis for the envi~c~s.~atal assasm~ents for the subject =ra~cs. Assesm~ent Nos. 33433, 33470, 33383, 33469, 33434, 33413, and 33414 indicated that all potential/rapacts for the tracts can be mitigated to an a_cvJeFJ_=ble level. Project Consistency with/irkSted Specific Plan The subject tracts were thoroughly reviewed for ccmsistency with Adopted Specific Plan No. 219. =he residential densities and layout ccmfomn to t/le T~nd Use Plan. lott/n~, as shown cm tba tract maps, will acous.odate the zoning provisicas of the zoning ordinance adopted in cc~junctia~ with the Specific plnn. =he vesting t_-Bct m~os and o~e~axm~L~ng conditions of in Section III.B of t~e srec-4~c Plan. Issues dealt with at the ~esign stage of the tracts ha~e included internal cir~,lnticm within the tracts, mitigaticm of h'~-e..or'ic: resouroes, and geologic issues. FirBl~y, interzm/,._4'r,?,l:n4-{c~n kaS a omxmrn in all of the t. rac~s under co~sictsrat/cm, ex~mp~ for Vest/rig Tract No. 24137. ~ese c~xmrns were the County Parks De~e~U~st. _It. was datemined that the historic zesour~es geologic cn~c~--m ~.luded liquefactic~ for Vestin~ Tract 24137 and slope stability for a~ ~ of the tracts. l%eports were prepared c~ each issue and liquefacticm '~sue for Tract 24137 are presented in a-letter dated 1-30-89. of the ~ were ~e and s~,l~ be inco,~o,,ted into the dayelephant and constructam of the tracts. StaffPaport Vest/rag Tract Nos. 24131 2t~,rae.i 14o. 1 24132 aqmended No. 2 24133 ~ 14o. 1 24134 Jqas~v4ma No. 1 24135 auert. ded 14o. 1 24136 ~ No. 1 24137 -%.~'_-<3 No. i Page 5 1. Seven Tentative Vesting Tract Nos. 24131, 24132, 24133, 24134, 24135, 24136,'lnd 24137 have been su~nitted. 2. =he subject tracts are located entizely within adopted Specific Plan No. 219. 3. Tne sevenvestingtractskmve~eendesigned to the develcFa~nt standards of j~cgcedSpecific P~a~No. 219. Envic~muental Assessmer~ Nos. 33433, 33470, 33383, 33469, 33434, 33413, and 33414, based cm the findings of Envicca~aer~al 1rapact .Report No. 235, prepared for Specific P/an 14o. 219, indicate that the ernrlrc~veltal inloacts _P~q be a~Dided or mitigated to an accegcable level, except for camlat/ve Air Quality hupacts, which cannot be fully mitigated. A statement of Overriding Findings for ct~=tive Air Quality in~acts was a~roved by the Board of Supervisors cm 0ctcber 4, 1988. 5.' Develc~a~ent/~greem~cNo. 4 ~m~been recordeaforSpecific Plan No. 219. 1. The proposed tracts conform to S~cific Plan No. 219. The proposed vesting tracts outCorm to the requj_-wenta of Ordinance 348 and 460· Nos. 33433, 33470, 33383, 33469, 33434, 33413, and 33414, the subject vesting tracts w~3~ not have a significant effect m the envitame~t, with the exceF~_cn of c,-,-,~tive Air Quality ~"T,,~e 'amich'cannot be fully Sta~ of ~ F~a~cjs for ctxm,~tive Air Quality impacts k/A-x~4 of a Negative De~-3=,',at:l.f:m for Erxv'~-x,---A='t Assesanent Nos. 33433, 33470, 33383,. 33469, 33434, 33413, a~d 33414 besed cm the finding that the project design and the omdi~ of ~; and, aPPKNAL of Vesting Tentative Tragc No. 24131 ~uz_faed No. 1, subject to the attached cax~itiu of aL-,a.~c,v'al; 'and, Staff Report Vesting Tract Nos. 24131/%~nded No. 1 24132/~ended No. 2 24133 ammded No. 1 24134/~mended No. 1 24135 ]emnded No. 1 24136 A~xK~ed No. 1 24137/%m~aa No. i Page 6 ~ o£ Ve, st~ Tentative Tract 14o. 24132 J~nended No. 2, subject to the attached .col.'ticks o~ ai4~ov-3; and, of vesting Tentative Tract caxiitions of aRamval~ and, No. 24133/~n~ea No. 1, subject to the of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24134/~ended No. 1, subject to the ~ditions of spprovB1; and, APPIqOVAL of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24135/~mended No. 1, subject to the attached conditions of ~; and, ~ of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24136 Amended No. 1, subject to the attached ccmditials of ~; and, ~ of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24137 Amended No. 1, subject to the attached conditicrm of ai3proTdl. o0:cj · ~VAC I LAND USE , VAC IEI '1 ~ ;CAT-T! m.A..'r-T-ERF, D · VAC · . \ ":i ' "~' \'~ \ ' 'P"/~ °'~° MAP ( "'; I}AI}p. BEDFORD PROPERTIE"""'~ "~ Use 2529 LOTS · Arel RANCHO CALIF lit S,p. Dlst ~ ..~.. r ~ ~ 2 o o o' I/wvE'~/Z:~ ClXav77 RZVERSZDE COUNTY PLANNZNG DEPARTMENT SUBDZVZSZON CONDZTTONS OF APPROVAL VESTZNG TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 24135 AMENDED NO'. I STANDARD CONDZTZONS The su~dtvtder shall defend. tnde,mtfy. and hold hamless the County of RIverside. tts agents, officers, and employees from'any clatm. actton. or proceeding agatnst the County of Riverside or tts agents. officers. or employees to attack, set astde, votd, or annul an approval of the County agencte Pal boards or legislative body of RIverside, its advtsory ~~3~ended No. I which action concerning Vesting Tentative Tract is brought about within the time 'period provided for tn California Government Code Sectton 66499.37. The County of Riverside will promptly nottry the subdivider of any such clatm, action, or proceeding agatnst the County of RIverside and will cooperate fully in the defense. Zf the County fatls to promptly nottry the subdivider of any such clatm, action, or proceeding or fatls to cooperate fully tn the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, Indemnify, or hold hamless the County of Riverside. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule A, unless modified by the conditions listed below. This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance 460. The subdivider shall submit one copy of a soils report to the RIverside County Surveyor's Office and two copies to the Department of Butlding and Safety. The report shall address the sotls stability and geological conditions of the site. · If any grading is proposed, the subdivider shall submit one print of a comprehensive grading plan to the Department of Butldtng and Safety. The plan shall coeply with the Untform Butldtng Code, Chapter 70, as amended by Ordinance 457 and as may be additionally provided for tn these conditions of approval. TENTATZVE TitACT N0. 24135, Mo. ,. Conditions of Approval Page 2 7. A gradin pemtt shall be obtatned from the Department of Butlain9 and Safety pr~ outstale of maintai ned or to commencement of any grading COUnty road fight of way, 8. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recoraaUon of the fi no1 map. 9. The subdivider shall comply wtth the street improvement recommendations outltnkd in the Riverside County Road Oepartment's letter dated i-S-ag~ 4-12-89 a copy of which ts attached. (Amended - Planntn~ Commission - April 12, 1989) Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provlaed from the tract map boundary to a County maintained road. 11. All road easements shall be offered for dedication to.the public and shall conttnue tn force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Road Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to approval of the Road Commissioner. 12. Easements, when requ i red for roadway bl opes, drai name faci 11 ties, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located wi thin the 1 and di vi si on boundary. A11 offers of dedi cati on and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the County Surveyor. 13. Water and sewera9e disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County health Department's letter dated 2-27-89 a copy of which is attached. 14. The subdivider shall comply with the flood control . recommendations outlined by the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated 3-27-89 a copy of which t s attached. If the 1 and di vi si on l i es wi thin an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the Road Coaaisstoner. 15. The subdivider shall comply ~th the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County Fire Marshal's letter dated 2-24-89, a copy of which is attached. 16. Subdivision phasing, including any proposed common open space area improvement phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning Department approval. Any proposed phasing shall provt de for aaecluate vehicular access to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially confom to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135,/end. Conditions of Approval Page 3 17. The subdivider and all successors in interest shall comply with provisions of Development Agreement No. 4 and Specific Plan No. 219. 18. Lots Created by this subdivision shall comply with the following: a) All lots shall have a minimum size of 5,000 square feet. 19. 0e the b) Corner lots and through lots, if any, shall be provided with additional area pursuant to Section 3.BB of Ordinance 460 and so as not to contain less net area than the least amount of net area in non-corner and non-through lots. c) Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the Specific Plan zone· d) Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained condition and shall be either planted with interim provided with other erosion control measures as Director of Building and Safety. in a weed-free landscaping or approved by the e) Trash bins, loading areas and incidental storage areas, located in recreation areas shall be located away and visually screened from surrounding areas with the use of block walls and landscaping. {Amended - Planning Commission - April 12, 1989) f) Bike racks and bike lockers in sufficient quantity shall be provided in convenient locations to facilitate bike access to the pwe~eet aFea recreation areas. (Amended - Planning Commission - April 12, 1989) Prior to RECORDATION of the final map the following conditions shall be satisfied: Prior to the recorder,on of the final map the. applicant shall submit written clearances to the Riverside County Road and Survey Department that all pertinent requirements outlined in the attached approval letters from the following agencies have been met: County Fire Department County Flood Control County Health Department County Parks Department A property owners' association with the unqualified right to assess the owners of the individual units for reasonable maintenance costs shall be' established and continuously maintained. The association shall have the right to lien the property of the owners who default in the payment of their assessments. Such lien shall not be subordinate to any encumbrance other than a first deed of trust provided such deed of trust is made in good faith and for value and is of record prior to the lien of the association. TEHTATZVE TI~CT NO. 24135, AEd. tl Conditions of Approval Page 4 GeeMty fee m4mph t+t~e. to a~ asssos o~ assmen open spa. aweas. fpee end .e~eaw ef al~ qtenS. 4~iKes. assessment. ~eases ~eee~ded and wnweeoPded, and easements. eNeep~ those ea.emen. ~h4ek 4n the sole Geent~ aceopting ttt~e to seek aweas. the aebdiv4dew ska;~ swimit the ska~ be seb~eet te the appweva~ o~that depawtment and the Qfftee o~ the Gewnky GeeRoe;+ sample deeMmen, eenveytq title te the pwwehaseP of an ind~vtdwal emit whisk p~evtdes that the desks,antes e.f so,eRas,s, The dee~awatieM ef e~eRaRts. sendinteRs and weSt~tettOnS ewbmttted ~oF ~evte. sha~/ca, pPevtde fop a tess of 6Q ~eawe, ,b½ pMovtde ~e~ the establishment of a p~epewty ew~ewe~ easeeta,ion eemp~tsed of 4he ewnews e~ eaeh 4nd4vtdual ~e{ eP un+~ and ~e½ eenta4n the fel~ewtRg pPev+siens ANetvd,4..thstandtRg any pPevis~en tn 4hii DesksPa,ten 4e the eeRtwaPy~ the ~el~ew~ng pPevtsteR shall aPPlY+ p~epe~ty ewRePs~ assestatteR established he~elR GeuRty O4F Rivewelds, and the pepsPly ewReweA unconditionally seeapt ~Pem the GeMany o~ R4veps4de, WpeR the Gewnty&s papt46w~aPly deseptbed as ~ets A thPewgh the sob dieswetteR e~ the GeMely e{ .the event 4hat the eemmen awes, ep any paPS tke~ef, 4s eaR,eyed te evm seek ZOORISeR -awea&~ shall senage and seRttneees~yJsitntatR seek Aemn aweaZ, 0~ any pap, theweary absent the pp4m, ww~ttew eaRsent 4he PlaRRlq D4-Peste~ ef4he GeWRty e4rR+veweide e4,4he ~OeRIyAS sacassess-in-tale,sol, The peepspry OWRepSA seasedition shall hive weasonabh east of ms4n~s4nhg seek noesten aweaz, end sha~ have the p&ght te l&en the pweper&y .f any sash OURe~ ~ho defaults 4R the settee sf assessment ew ethe~ deemsst ewes,in! the assessseat ~ten. / TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135,/bad. #1 CondtUons of Approval ' Page 5 ],. ;his DesksTulles ska~l set be leFmtsstedw Asubstesttal~yz amended e~ pwepew~y deanseNed tkewe~wem absent ike pwte~ wwttleR sensent s~ the P~SSStS9 eimmskew of ~ke Geun~y e~ Riverside ei, ~ke Goum~y~s sueeessew-in-tske~eskv A F~eFesed mmesdment ska~ be sensidewed ASUbSlSstta~ 4~ 4t s~ests ~ke esiest~ usage ewsa~ntesanse ef ~he AssseeR ewesA, eke event e~ lay eesf~tet between (his Des~aFat~eR asd ~ke Ar~teles e~ .tsee~pewsitenv the By~awsv ew the pwepepty sweepsA easeRiskieR Ru~es and Regu~atteRs~ 4~ amy3 4Its Dee~a~atieR sha~4 eent~e~,n Ones apFwevedT lie deedswaiVes e~ sevensmisT eesd~t~ess and wes~wie~ioss ska~ be ~eeewded at tke same ~&me ~kst ~ke fisa~ map is Peee~dedv (Deleted -Planntng Commission - April 12, 1989) Prior to recordatton of the final subdivision map, the subdivider shall submit the following documents to the Planning Department for review, which documents shall be subject to the approval of that department and the Office of the County Counsel: 1) A declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions; and 2) A sample document conveying title to the-purchaser of an individual lot or unit which provides that the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions is incorporated therein by reference. The declaration of covenants,, conditions and restrictions submitted for review shall (a) provide for a minimum term of 60 years, (b) provide for the establishment of a property owners' association comprised of the owners of each individual lot or unit, (c) provide for ownership of the common area by either the property owners' association or the owners of each individual lot or unit as tenants in common and (d) contain the following provisions verbatim: "Notwithstanding any provision in this Declaration to the contrary, the following provision shall apply: continuously mantatn particul a rly descrl bed as lots A through V on Vesting I r)ct Nap No. 24135 Amended No. 1 attached her, to, and shall not sell or transfer the 'cormnon area', or any part thereof, absent the prior written consent of the Planning Director of the County of Riverside or the County's successor-in-interest. The property owners' association shall have the right to assess the owners of each individual lot or unit for the reasonable cost of maintaining the 'common area' and shall have the right to lien the TBTATIVETRACTRO. 24135, Amd. el Condtttomms of Approval Page 6 2e property of any such owner who defaul'ts in the payment of a maintenance assessment. An assessment lien, once created, shall be prtor to all other liens recorded subsequent to the notice of assessment or other document creattng the assessment lien. Thts Declaration shall not be temtnated, 'substantially' amended or property deannexed therefrom absent the prior written consent of the Plarmtng Director of the County of Rherstde or the County's successor-in-interest. A proposed amendment shall be considered 'substantial' tf it affects the extent, usage or maintenance of the *common area*. In the event of any conflict between this Declaration and the Articles of Incorporation, the Bylaws or the property owners' association Rules and regulations, if any, this Declaration shall control." Once approved, the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be recorded at the same time that the final rap Is recorded. (Added - Planning Commission - April 12, 1989) The developer shall comply with the following parkway landscaping conditions: 1) Prior to recordatton of the final map the developer shall file an application with the County for the fomation of or annexation to, a parkway maintenance district for Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24135 Amended No. I in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, unless the project is within an existing parkway maintenance district. 2) Prior to the issuance of building pemtts, the developer shall secure approval of proposed landscaping and irrigation plans from the County Road and Planning Department. All landscaping and irrigation plans and specifications shall be prepared in a reproducible format suitable for pemanent filing with the County Road Department. 3) The developer shall post a landscape performance bond which shall be released concurrently with the release of subdivision performance ' bonds, guaranteetng the vtabtltty. of all landscaping which will be Installed prior to the assumption of the maintenance responsibility by the district. 4) The developer, the developer's successors-in-interest or assignees, shall be responsible for all parkway landscaping maintenance. until such time as mintenance is taken over by the district. 5) The developer shall comply with the standards and exhlbtts In Specific Plan No. 219. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135, AId. #1 Conditions of Approval Page 7 The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and ~pkeep of all slopes, landscaped areas and Irrigation systems untt1 such ttme as those operations are the responsibilities of other parties as approved by the Planntng DIrector, Street 11ghts shall be provtded wtthtn the subdivision In accordance with the standards of Ordinance 46Z and the following: Z) Concurrently vrlth the ftllng of subdivision Improvement plans ~ith the Road Department, the developer shall secure approval of the proposed street light layout first from the Road Department's traffic engineer and then from the appropriate utility purveyor. z) Follo~ng approval of the street 11ghttng layout by the Road Department's traffic engineer, the developer shall also file an application wtth LAFCO for the fomatton of a street lighting district, or annexation to an extsttng 11ghting district, unless the stte Is vrlthtn an extsttng 11ghttng district. 3) Prior to recordatton of the ftnal map, the developer shall secure conditional approval of the street lighting application from LAFCO, unless the site ts wtthln an extstlng 11ghtlng district. 4) All street ltghts and other outdoor 11ghttng shall be sho~n on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Butldtng and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply ~th the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655 and the RIverside County Comprehensive General Plan. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared tn conjunction with the final map. to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the County Surveyor. A copy of the ECS'shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for revte~ and approval· The approved ECS shall be forwarded with coptes of the recorded final map to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. The following note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet: 'County Slope Stability Report No, 89 was prepared fo~ this property and ts on ftle at the RIverside County Planntng Department. Spectftc ttems of concern tn the report are as follows: slope stability.' Prtor to the lssuance of GRADZNG PERNZTS the following conditions shall be satisfied: TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135, Amd. #1 Conditions of Approval Page 8 be P~oF ~e the 4sseaeee e~ g~ad~eg pee.~la~ 4he app;~ea.~ ska~ ebia~. e~eawaeee fPem lhe Vvi. Fish and e,~sleeae ef lke iteWkeesz KaegaPee Rat s$le. (Deleted -Planntng Conm~tsston -Aprtl 12. 1989) Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Con;ervatton 'Plan prior to the payment of the fees required by Ordinance No. 633, the applicant shall pay the fee required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. Prior to the issuance of g~adieg building permits detailed con~non open space area landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval for the phase of development in process. The plans shall be certified by a landscape architect, and shall provide for the following: (Amended - Planning Commission - April 12, 1989) 1. Permanent automatic irrigation systems shall be installed on all landscaped areas requiring irrigation. 2. Landscape screening where required shall be designed to be opaque up to a minimum height of six {6) feet at maturity. All utility service areas and enclosures shall be screened from view with landscaping and decorative barriers or baffle treatments, as approved by the Planning Director. Utilities shall be placed underground. Parkways and landscaped building setbacks shall be landscaped to provide visual screening or a transition into the primary use area of the site. Landscape elements shall include earth benning, ground cover, shrubs and specimen trees in conjunction with meandering sidewal ks, benches and other pedestrian amenatlas where appropriate as approved by the Planning Department.' .5. Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent 'trees at key visual focal points Within the project. Where street trees cannot be interior streets and project right-of-way, they shall be right-of-way. planted within right-of-way of parkways due to insufficient road planted outside of the road 7. Landscaping plans shall incorporate native and drought tolerant plants where appropriate. TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 24135° Amd. tl Condtttoes of Approval Page 9 de A11 extsting specteen trees and significant rock outcroppings on the subject propert~ shall be shovm on the project's gradtrig plans and shall note those to be removed, ~elocated and/or retained. 9. All trees shall be mtnlmum double stake. gro~ng trees shall be steel staked. Weaker and/or slow 10..The plans shall confom to those sho~n in Spectftc Plan No. 219. Any oak trees removed vrith four (4) inch or larger trunk diameters shall be replaced on a ten (10) to one (1) basis as approved by the Planning Director. Replacement trees shall be noted on approved landscaping plans. The following tree preservation guidelines shall the projects approved gradtrig, building and appropriate: be Incorporated In landscaping plans as Every effort shall be made to prevent encroachment of structures, grading or trenching wtthtn the drtpllne or twenty-five (25) feet of the trunk of any trees, whichever ts greater. If encroachment wlthtn the drtpltne ts unavoidable, no more than one thtrd of the root area shall be disturbed, graded or covered wtth impervious materials. The root area is considered to extend beyond the drtpllne a distance equal to one half the radius. Building, gradtrig or Improvements shall not occur wtthtn ten (10) feet of any tree trunk. Retaining walls shall be constructed where necessary to preserve natural grade at least one-half the dtstance between the trunk and the dripline. Walls shall be destgned ~th a post or catsson footing rather than a continuous foottrig to mtntmtze root damage. Alteration of natural drainage shall be avoided to the greatest extent possible. Runoff channelled near trees shall not substantially change normal sotl motsture charactertstlcs on a seasonal basis. Runoff sba11 not be directed towards the base of trees so that the base of the trees remain tn wet sot1 for an extended pertod. Nhere natural topography has been altered, drainage away from trunks shall be provtded where necessary to ensure that water w111 not stand at the crown. /' / TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135, A,d. I1 Conditions of Approval Page 10 Sedtmentatton and stltatton in the drainage ~ays shall be controlled where necessary to avotd ftlltng around the base of the trees, Land uses that would cause excessive sot1 compactton withtn the drtpltne of trees shall be avoided. If the areas are planned for recreation, provtde tratls to restrtct compactton to a small area. ileavy use under trees shall be avoided unless eeasures to minimize compactton are undertaken. Landscaping or Irrigation shall not be Installed wtthtn ten (10) feet of any trees. All existing native specimen trees on the subject property shall be preserved wherever feasible· Where they cannot be preserved they shall be reiDcared or replaced with specimen trees as approved by the Planning Director. Replacement trees shall be noted on approved landscaping plans. All approved grading and building plans shall reflect the utilization of post and beam foundations or the appropriate combination of split level pads and post and beam foundations when development is proposed on natural slopes of fifteen percent or greater measured over a horizontal distance of thirty (30) feet· If the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of grading permits, an overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval. The plan shall be used as a guideline for subsequent detailed gradtng plans for individual phases of development and shall include the following: 1) Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion sedimentation during and after the grading process. and 2) Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas which may be graded during the higher probability rain months of January through March 3) Preliminary pad and roadway elevations 4) Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase Driveways shall be deslgned so as not to exceed a fifteen (15) percent grade. Grading plans shall conform to Board adopted Hillside Development Standards: All cut and/or ftll slopes, or individual combinations thereof, which exceed ten feet in verttcal height shall be modified by TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 24135, Alad. tl Conditions of Approval Page 11 7 · an appropriate combination of a spectal terracing (benchtng) plan, Increased slo~tt rat1, (t.e., 3:1), retaining walls, and/or slope planttrig com ned wtth Irrigation. A11 drheways shall not exceed a fifteen percent grade. All cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded natural terratn and exceeding ten (10) feat in verttcal hetght shall be contour-graded incorporating the following gradtng techniques: 1) The angle of the grade slope shall be gradually adjusted to the angle.of the natural terrain, 2) Angular foms shall be discouraged· The graded fom shall reflect the natural rounded terrain· 3) The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves with radii designed in proportion to the total height of the slopes where drainage and stability permit such rounding, 4) Where cut or ftll slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal length, the horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved in a continuous, undulating lashton. Natural features such as water courses, specimen trees and significant rock outcrops shall be protected in the stttng of individual butlding pads on final gradtng plans. Prior to the issuance of gradtng permits, the developer shall provtde evtdence to the Dtrector of Butldtng and Safety that all adjacent off-site manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and that slope maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by the Dtrector of Butldtng and Safety. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained by the developer for consultation and comment on the proposed grading ~th respect to potential paleontologtcal impacts. Should the paleontologist ftnd the potential ts htgh for tmpact to significant resources, a pre-grade eeettng between the paleontologist and the excavation and gradtrig contractor shall be arranged. klhen necessary, the paleontologist or representative shall have the authority to temporarily dtvert, redtrect or halt gradtrig acthtty to allow recovery of fosstl s. Prtor to the tssuance of BUZLD/NG PERNZTS the following conditions shall be satisfied: 1) The project shall comply wtth the requirements of Development Agreement No. 4. / / TENTATZVE TRACT NO. ;4135, Amd. tl Conditions of Approval Page 12 2) 3) 4) Prtor to the submittal of butldtng plans to the Department of Butlding and Safety an acoustical study shall be perfomed by an acoustical engtneer to establish appropriate mitigation measures that shall be applted to Individual dwelltng untts within the subdivision to reduce ambient tntertor notse levels to 45 Ldn, PrtGr to the tssuance of bulldlng pemtts, composite landscaping and Irrigation plans shall be submltted for Planning Department approval. landscaping and Irrigation to be ~ Including, but not 1trotted to, parkway planting, street trees, slope planting, and Individual front yard landscaping per the requirements of Specific Plan No. 219. All dwellings to be constructed wtthtn thts subdivision shall be destgned and constructed wtth fire retardant (Class B) roofs as approved by the County Fire Marshal. 5) Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted withtn the subdivision, however solar equipment or anY other energy savlng devtces shall be pemttted with Planntng Department approval. 6) Roof-mounted equipment shall be shtelded from view of surrounding property. 7) Butldtng separation between all buildings excluding fireplaces shall not be less than ten (10) feet. 8) All street stde yard setbacks shall be a mtnimum of ten (10) feet· 9) All front yards shall be provtded wtth landscaping and automatic irrigation. Prtor to the tssuance of OCCUPANCY PEPJqZTS the following conditions shall be sat1 sft ed: 1) kla11 and/or fence locations and materials sba11 confom to the approved wall and fence .treatment plan tn Spedftc Plan No. 219. 2) All landscaping and Irrigation shall be Installed tn accordance with approved plans prtor to the tssuance of occupancy pemtts. Zf seasonal conditions do not pemtt planting, tntertm landscaping and erosion control measures shall be uttllzed as approved by the Planntng Dtrector and the Dtrector of Butldtng and Safety. 3) All landscaping and Irrigation shall be Installed tn accordance with approved plans and shall be verified by a Planntng Department field Inspection. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135, Coadtttons of Approval Page 13 4) Not withstanding the preceding conditions, wherever 'an acoustical study ts requtred for notse attenuation purposes, the hetghts of requtred wails shall be determined by the acoustical study where applicable. s) Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the subdivision tn accordance with the standards of Ordinance 461 and Specific Plan No. 219., 6) Street trees shall be planted throughout the subdivision tn accordance with the standards of Ordinance 460 and Spectftc Plan No, 219 Prtor to the tssuance of a butldtng pemtt, the subdivider shall prepare and submtt a wrttten report to the P]annlng Dtrector of the County of Riverside demonstrating comp]tance wlth those conditions of approva] and mitigation measures of thls map and E.A. No. 33434 whtch must be satisfied prtor to the tssuance of 8 but]dtng permtt. The Planning Director may require Inspection or other monitoring to assure such compliance. (Added - Planning Commission - Apt11 12, 1989) CO:cj:gs OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR Riverside County Planning Commission 4080 Lemon ~treet Riverside, CA 92501 April 12, 1989 Mam.e+m-6r-l~89 P O. IOX momO MJ~I:J~. CALI~OI.,I, ff~O~ l?|4; :17.6554 Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: TR 24135 - Amend #1 Schedule A - Team SP - SND#9 *As Amended at P.C. 4-12-89 With respect to the conditions of approval for the' referenced tentative land division map, the Road Department recommends that the landdivider provide the following street improvement plans and/or road dedications in accordance with Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement Standards (Ordinance 461). It is understood that the tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerline profiles, all existing easements,_. traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate O's, and that their omission or unacceptability may require the map to be resubmitted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the following conditions are essential parts and a requirement occurring in ONE is as- binding as though occurring in all. They are intended to be complementary and to describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Road Commissioner's Office. 1. The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, i,e., concentration of diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities including enlarging existing facilities and/ or by securing · drainage easement. All drainage easements shall be shown on the final map and noted as followsz 'Drainage Easement - no building, obstructions, or encroachments by land fills are allowed". The protection shall be as approved by the Road Department. 2. The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the Road-Commissioner permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage facilities as approved by.the Road Department. TR 2il)5 - Amend #1 ae~W~-~r-lge9 April 12, 1989 Page 2 Major drainage is involved on this landdivision and its resolution shall be as approved by the Road Department· Street 'M' shall be improved within the dedicated right of way in accordance with modified County Standard No. 100, (84'/108' as approved by th~ Road Commissioner]. Streets 'B', ,p,,, .L, (north of Street 'N'), and Street "E" (at Pio Pico Road) shall be improved within the dedicated right of way in accordance with modified County Standard No. 104, Section A. (50'/70' with entry median as approved by the Road Commissioner]. The remaining interior streets shall be improved within the dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 104, Section A. (40'/60') Margarita Road shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter located 43 feet from centerline and match up asphalt concrete paving; reconstruction; or resurfacing of existing paving as determined by the Road Commissioner within a 55 foot half width dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 100. Street "A" shall be improved with 34 feet of asphalt concrete pavement within a 45 foot part width dedicated right of way in accordance with modified County Standard No. 103, Section A. {24'/33', as approved by the Road Commisioner) Pio Pico Road shall be improved with 34 feet of asphalt concrete pavement within a 45 foot part width dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 103, Section A. (22'/33') Corner cutbacks in Conformance 'with County Standard No. 805 shall be shown on the final map and offered for dedication. Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the . Riverside County Road Commissioner. Completion of road improvements does not imply acceptance for main- tenance by County. TR 24135 - Amend ~1 Ksr{~-&s-ieee. April 12, 1989 Page 3 3e 4e 18. 19. 23. Standard cul-de-sacs 'and knuckles and off-set cul-de-sacs shall be constructed throughout the landdivislon~ Aspbaltic emulsion {fog seal) shall be applied not less than fourteen days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section 37, 39 and94 of the State Standard Specifications. The landdivider will provide left turn lanes on Pio Pico Road and Street "a' at all interior intersections as approved by the Road Department. The landdivider shall provide utility clearance from Rancho California Water District prior to the recordation of the final map. The maximum centerline gradient and the minimum centerline radii shall be in conformance with County Standard #114 of Ordinance 461. All centerline intersections shall be at 90° wi~h a inimunV 5 ' ~;ent m~a~ed from flow line) ~ n¢ ~T/~-,v¢~m&//4 "'- Concrete sidewalks shall be constr~cted throughout the landdivision in accordance with County Standard No, 400 and 401 (curb sidewalk), The minimum lot frontages along the cul-de-sacs and knuckles shall be 35 feet. All driveways. shall conform to the applicable Riverside County Standards and shall be shown on the street improvement plans. A minimum of four feet of full height curb shall be constructed between driveways. The minimum garage setback shall be 30 feet measured from the face of curb. Prior to the recordatton of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Road Department; a cash stun of $150.00 par lot as mitigation for traffic signal Impacts. Should the developar choose to defer the time of payment, a written agreement may be entered into with the County deferring said payment to the time of lssuance of a building parmlt. Electrical and communications trenches shall be provided in accordance with Ordiaance 461, Standard 817. TR 241~5 - Amend #1 .Marcb-~,-~l~J Apt1] Page 4 12, 1989 28. 29. 30. 32. Lot access shall be restricted on Margarita Road, Street NM'. PiO PtCo Road, and Street 'A' and so noted on the final map. Landdivtsionscreating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the streets shall provide erosion control, sight distance control and slope easements as approved by the Road Department. When blockwalls are required to be constructed on top of s18pe, a debris retention wall shall be constructed at the street right of way line to prevent silting of sidewalks as approved by the Road Commissioner. The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated with Specific Plan No. 219. Street lighting shall be required in accordance with Ordinance 460 and 461 throughout the subdivision. The County Service Area (CSA) Administrator determines whether this proposal qualifies under an existing assessment district or not. If not, the land owner shall file an application with LAFCO for annexation into or creation of a "Lighting Assessment District" in accordance with Governmental Code Section 56000. Street lights shall be installed in accordance with Ordinance 460 and 461 at all intersections of roads constructed or improved within the subdivision. The county Service Area (CSA) Administrator determines whether the subdivision is within an existing assessment district. If not, the land owner shall file an application with LAFCO for annexation into or creation of a County Service Area in accordance with Governmental Code Section 25210.1. All private and public entrances and/or intersections opposite this project shall be coordinated with this project and shown on the street improvement plans. A striping plan is required for Margarita Road, Pio Pico Road, Street 'M" and Street "A~. The removal of the existing striping shall be the responsibility of applicant. 'Traffic signing and striping shall be done by County forces with all incurred costs borne by the applicant. Should this* project lie within any assessment/benefit district, the applicant shall prior to recordation make application for and pay for their reapportionment of the assessments or pay the unit fees in the benefit district unless said fees are deferred to building permit. TR 24135 - Amend tl -March-i,-agig April 12, 1989 Page 5 The following conditions from Specific Plan No. 219 - Vail Meadows shall also apply: All road improvements, unless otherwise noted, shall be constructed to ultimate County Standards in accordance with Ordinance No. 460 and 461 as a requirement of the implementing subdivisions for the Specific Plan, subject to approval by the Road Commissioner. The proposed "Gateway Road" is approved, in concept, subject to the submittal and ~eview of design details. Any landscaping within public road rights of way will require approval by the Road Commissioner and assurance of continuing maintenance through the establishment of a landscape maintenance district or similar mechanism as approved by the Road Commissioner. The Rancho Villages Assessment is an integral component of the planning for this area. Prior to the recordation of tract maps within this specific plan or any other project located within the assessment district, the final actions necessary for formation of the district must be completed. Should the district fail, the project proponent shall, prior to the recordation of any tract maps within the specific plan boundaries, provide for road improvements in accordance with Table XV-lmplementation Schedule for On- Site Roadway Improvements and Table XVI-Implementation Schedule for Off-Site ~oadway Improvements, as attached. In response to the concerns 'voiced' by Caltrans relative to cumulative impacts indicating the need to implement demand management strategies and/or provide for the development of additional highway corridors, the project proponent has agreed to fund such a study to be conducted under the direction of the Road Department as prescribed by Caltrans. The study is currently in progress. Very truly yours, Elmer Baumgarten Subdivision Engtneer · £B:Jw County of Riverside FROM: RE: RIVERSIDE COUI~TY PLANNING DEPT. DATE: February _ris Ormsby 6AMMARTIN~~VIRONHENTALHEALTH SPECIALIST IV TRACT NAP 24135, Amended No, I 27, 1989 Environmental Health Services has reviewed Amended No. 1 dated February 23,192~Our currant c~---.ents ~rlll remain as stated in our letterdated January 11, 1989. SN:tac J"FEB Z 8 1989 "";'' GEN. FORM 4, (]bv. ~ / / COUNTY OF i IVERSIDE DEPARTMENT of HEALTH January 11, 1999 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92502 ATTN: Chris Ormsby RE: TRACT MAP 24135: Parcels 8 and 9 of Parcel Map 23~32 (325 Lots) IlliI,TII liltfillS RAMlET ITIqEIT JaNesiNG. C;A ella0 Gentlemen: The Department of Public Health has revieved Tentative Map No. 24135 and reconnnends that: IS3 II~TI4 8AC)AD%WAY 8LTVI4E. ~j. Ils'le, .rail It&lga TJdO MAMGUERITA IIIVl~lll2}f.. CA lmiOd ~ellOla COPtOga. IS0 NOATN STATE IT. 14EIdET. Ca Isl4l de-lOt O/JIB ITIIELrT IND.. CA IlZO I litel ItllllOI! 80116 FIIAIIM iPALI IPIIIII li'&$ Ta,HCIUITZ,eCC~ pa~em ldq~M~S. C.A SIll! mill Pillill. CA 91270 $lll Id122JOl eaWl}. A water system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the water company and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of' the water system shall be subn~ttted in triplicate, with a minimum scale not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along with the original drawing to the County Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and Joint specifications, and the size of the main at the Junction of the new system to the existin2 system. The plans shall comply in all respects with Div. 5, Part 1, Chapter 7 of the California Health and Safety Code, California Aa~4n4strative Code, Title 22, Chapter 16, and General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, when applicable. The pls-a'shall be signed by a registered engineer and water company with the following certification: "I certify that the. des,an of the water system in Tract Map 24135 is in accordancewith the water system expansion plans of the Elsinore Vallsy~micipal Water District and that the water service, storage and distribution systemwill be adequate to provide water service.to such tract. This certification does not constitute a 8uarantee that ,twill supp17water to such tract at any specific quantiCies,.flows or pressures for fire protection or any other purpose". This certification shall be siSned by a responsible official of the water company. The plans must be subndtted to the County SurveTor's Office to review at least two weeks prior to the request for the recordation of the final map. eeeeu: Rtnrstde Counny Pls-~{ng Depn. 'Page Two ATRq: Chrls Ormsby January 11~ 1989 This DeparOnenn has a stmtemenn from the Elsinore Valley Municipal We=at Dishrich agreeing =o serve dom&s=ic waner. no each and every lot in =he subdivision on d--and, providing satisfactory financial arrangemeans are completed vith =he Subdivider. In rill be necessary for the financial arrangements to be made prior to nhe recordanion of =he final map. This DeparUnean has a sCaC~eat from the Elsinore Valley Municipal Wa6er Disnrict agreeing to alloy the mubdivision sevage sysnem to be connecned to the sewers of =he Disnrict. The sewer sysnem shall be installed according to plans and specificanions as approved by the Dishrich, =he Coun~ Surveyor and the Bealth Deparunen=. Permanent prints of nhe plans of the sewer sysnem shall be submi==ed in nriplicane, along vi=h nhe original drawing, to the Counny Surveyor. The prinns shall shew the innernal pipe diemener, locanion of manholes, complene profiles, pipe and ~oinn specifications and the size of nhe sewers an the Juncnion of =he new sysnem no the exisninZ sysnem. A single plan indicaning locanion of sewer lines and wa=er lines shall be a portion of the sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be signed by a regis~ered enZine. er and the sewer disnrict winh the followin~ certification: "I cerT/fy =ha= the design of the sewer sysnem in Tracn Nap 24135 is in accordmncevith nhe sewer sysnem expansion plans of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Waner Disnrict and nhan nhe wasne disposal sysnem is adequane an this time no nrean nhe annicipa=ed washes from =he proposed tracn". The plans mus= be submin=ed no nhe Coun=y Surveyor's Office to review a~ leash ~wo weeks prior no nhe request for rhe recorda=ion of the final map. In will be necessary for the financial arrangements no be made prior to recordanion of Che final map. Sincerely, Environmental Real=h Services pianlnO&r%'-* ~nSC)rx:e 46-2(~ C),is SiNe, Suite 405 kdio, CA 9220i (619) 342-8886 ~TION wm4 THE DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY FIRE PROTECTION AI~F,,NJ. ~ TIP,/: 2-24-89 Pimmb~&r~-_ '--4C)!k~ 4OBO Lemon.~Rei, Sujte IlL P..~rak. C&925C)l (714) TO: ATTN: PLANNING DEPARTMENT CHRIS OEMSBY TRACT 24135- AMENDED With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division, the Fire Department recommends the followinK fire protection measures be provlded in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: FlEE PROTECTION Schedule "A" fire protection approved standard 'fire hydrants, (6"x4"x2~") located one at each street intersection and spaced no more than 330 feet apart in any direction, with no portion ofany lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Hinimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI. Applicant/developer sh~ll furnish one copy of the water system plans to the FAre Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: 'I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department." The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be insta3/ed and accepted by the appropriate water aSency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. HAZARDOUS FIRE AREA The land division is located in ~he "Hazardous Fire Area" of Riverside County as shown on a map on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. any building constructed on lots created by this land division shall comply with the special construction provisions contained in Riverside County Ordinance 546. All road medians to be set back 30 feet from curb line at all intersections- Subject: Tract 24135 Page 2 All buildings shall be constructed wiCh fire retardant roofing material as described in Seccion 3203 of Che'Uniform BuildinS Code. Any rood shingles or shakes shall have a Class "B" raCinS and she//be approved by the Fire Department prior =o installation. HITIGATION Prior to Ehe recorda=ion of the finalmap, =he developer shall deposit with the Riverside CounEy Fire Department, a cash sum of $400.00 p~r lot/unit as mitigation for fire protee=ion impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the Eime of payment, h~/she may en=er into a written aSreement wi=h the County deferring said payment ~o the Eime of issuance of Ehe first building permit. All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred Eo =he Planning and Engineering staff. RAYNOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner By Kurt Bantwell, Fire Safety Specialist ama KENNETH L. !::DWARDI eNiILe INilNleI!I RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT IIIVIRII~I, GALIle~IINIA IllOl M rch 27, 1989 a Illl IlallKTr IVllltP'r P. O. BOX loll TI, I,,I:I~NONe (7141 717-1011 Riverside County Planning Department County Administrative Center Riverside, California Attentions Specific Plan Section Chris Ormsby Ladies and Gentlemen= Vesting Tract 24135 Amended Map No- I This is a proposal to divide about 83 acres in the Rancho Cal- ifornia area. The site is to the north of Highway 79 between Margarita Road and Butterfield Stage Road. This project is a part of Specific Plan 219, Vail Meadows. The area consists of well defined ridges and natural watercourses which traverse this property. Local offsite flows are tributary to the site's northeast and southeast boundaries. A storm drain is proposed along Pio Pico Road to collect the flows from the southeast. This storm drain would be connected to an existing 120-inch diameter storm drain across the school site to the southeast as shown on the Exhibit B. Another storm drain is pro- posed across the middle of this property. This storm drain would discharge the flows into two existing 42-inch diameter culverts under Margarita Road as shown on the tentative map. Onsite flows and other local offsite flows would be conveyed with streets and the above two storm drains. Following are the District's reconnnendations= The 100 year offsite tributary flows should be collected and safely conveyed through the site to an adequate outlet. Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right of way ahould be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note should be added to the final map stating, sDrainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructionss· Offsite drainage facilities should be located within publicly dedicated drainage easements obtained from the affected property owners. The documents should be recorded and a copy submitted to the District prior to recordation of the final map. -2- March 27, 1989 Riverside County Planning Department Rez Vesting Tract 24135 Amended Map No. i 4- All lots should be graded to drain to the adjacent street or an adequate outlet. The 10 year storm flow should be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm flow should be contained within the street right of way. When either of these criteria is exceeded, additional drainage facilities should be installed. Drainage facilities outletting sump conditions should be designed to convey the ~ributary 100 year storm flows· Additional emergency escape should also be provided. The property's street and lot grading should be designed in a manner that perpetuates the existing natural drainage patterns with respect to tributary drainage area, outlet points and outlet conditions, otherwise, a drainage easement should be obtained from the affected property owners for the release of concentrated or di- verted storm flows. A copy of the recorded drainage easement should be submitted to the District for review prior to the recordation of the final map. Temporary erosion control measures should be implemented iu.,,ediately following rough grading to prevent deposition of debris onto downstream properties or drainage facilities. Development of this property should be coordinated with the development of adjacent properties to ensure that watercourses remain unobstructed and stormwaters are not diverted from one watershed to another. This may require the construction of temporary drainage facilities or offsite construction and grading. 0e A portion of the proposed project is in a floodplain and my affect =waters of the United States', =wetlandss or -Jurisdictional streambeds', therefore, in accordance with the requirements of the National Flood Insurance-' Program and Related Regulations (44 CFR, Parts 59 through 73) and County Ordinance No. 458z A c oFf of appropriate correspondence and necessary permits from those government agencies from which approval is required byFederal or State law (such as Corps of Engineers 404 permit or Department of Fish and Game 1603 agreement) should be provided to the District prior to the final District approval of the project. R~verside County Planning Department Re~ Vesting Tract 24135 Amended Map No. I -3- March 27, 1989 Major flood control facilities are being proposed. Th~se should be designed and constructed to District standards including those related to alignment and access to both inlets and outlets. The applicant should consult the District early in the design process regarding materials, hydraulic design and transfer of rights of way. All flood control facilities should be constructed to District standards. And all facilities that the DistrAct will assume for maintenance will require the payment of a one time maintenance charge equal to the 'present worthm of maintenance costs from the time of acceptance through 1998. A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final map along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations should be submitted to the District via the Road Department for review and approval prior to recordation of the final map. Grading plans should be approved prior to issuance of grading permits. Questions concerning this matter may be referred to Robert Chiang of this office at' 714/787-2333. Very truly yours, KENNETH L. EDWARDS /J_OHN H..~ASHUBA Senior Civil Engineer Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates RCxpln ~anuary 18,. 1989 Administrative Center, 1777 Atlanta Avenue Riverside, CA 92507 Riverside County Planning ~epartment Attentio~z Ron Goldman County Administra~ive Center 4080 Lemon Street. Riverside, CA 92501 RE: Vesting Tract 24135 Ladies and Gentlemenz The Land Use Division ~f the Department of Building and Safety has the following comments and conditionsz Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall obtain Planning Department approval for all on-site and off- site signage advertising the sale of the subdivision pursuant to Section 19.6 of Ordinance 348. Prior to issuance of building permits, proposed lighting must be in conformance with Mount Palomar Lighting Plan, Zone B. per Ordinance 655. Fireplaces may encroach 1' into required minimum 5' side'yard setback. Mechanical equipment may not be located in required minimum side yard setback. Very t~uly yours, Thomas H. lngram, DirectOr DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY Administration (714) 682-8840 · (714) 787-2020 ~ es STATE OF C,,AUFORNL~ IUSeWS$, TIANStarrAllON AND NOUING AOINCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION January 3, 1989 Development Review 08-Riv-79-17.376 Your Reference: VT 2q135 Plannini Department Attention Nr. Chris Ormsby County of Riverside q080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 Dear Nr. Ormsby: Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed Vesting Tract 24135 located adjacent to Nargarita Road and north of Pio Pico Road in Rsncho California. Please refer to the attached Development Review Form which documents Caltrans' requirements for this project. Conformsnee with these conditions is required for issuance of an Encroachment Permit. If any work is necessary within the state highway riSht of way, the developer must obtain sn encroachment permit from the Caltrsns District 8 Permit Office prior to beginning work. additional information is desired, please call Nr. Thomas J. Neville at (71q) Very truly yours, ..~tr'.'N'~.N, LEWANDOWSEI District Permits Engineer Att· (Your' Refe'e~e) .- --. Plan Checker WE WOULD LIKE TO NOTE: CALTRANS DEVELOPr4E~ REVE~ FQ Date (C~ Rte PM) · I~en plans are sutanitted, please conform to the requirements of the attached .. wHandoutw. This will expedite the review process and time required for Plan Check. Altho~h the traffic and drainage generated by this proposal do not appear to have a significant effect on the state highway systeu, consideration must be given to the cmnulative effect of continued develotxnent in :his area· Any measures necessary to mitigate the ctmulative impact of traffic and drainage srmll be provided prior to or with develotxnent of the area that necessitates them. b/ It appears that the traffic and drainage generated by this proposal could have a significant effect on the state highway system of the area. Any measures necesssry to mitigate the traffic and drainage impacts shall be included with the development. :.. This portion of state highway is included in the California Master Plan of State Highways Eligible for Official Seelie Bighway Designation, and in the future your agency may wish to have this route officially designated as a state scenic high~y. This portion of state highway has been officially designated as a state scenic highway, and develo~xnent in this corridor should be canpatible with the scenic highway concept. V/ It is recognized that there is considerable public concern about noise levels adjacent to heavily %x~veled highways. Land development, in order to be compatible with this concern, my require special noise attenuat&on measures. Develo~nent of property should include any necessary noise att~uation. WE REQUEST THAT TFJE ITEMS CHECKED BELOW BE INCLUDED IN TdE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THIS PROJECT: Normal right of way dedication to provide rail-width on the state highway. Normal street improvements to provide half-width on the state hi[~h~y. Curb and gutter, State Standard__ along the state highway. Parking shall be prohibited along the state high~y by painting the curb red and/or by the proper placement of "no parking" siena. radius curb returns be provided at intersec. tions with the state highway. l'~ndard wheelchair ramp must be provided in t.he returns. A positive ~ehieular barrier along the property frontage shall be provided to limit physical access to the 'state highway. Vehicular seeass shall not be developed directly to the state highway. ;. Vehicular seeass to the state hiShu~7-shall be provided by existing public road connections. Vehicular acee~___~ to the state b~.SM.'.~. &ball be provided.by standard driveways. '. ':-:l:.. Vehicular access shall ~ot. be provided within of the intersection at Vehicular .acce~ to the state hi~y shall be provided by a reed-type connection. Form 8-PD19 (Rev. 5/87) ~.Cont~nued on reverse) Date: January 3, 1989 79- ~'~TG (Co-E=e-PM) (Your Reference) ADDITION~T. ~0MM~NTS: Due to magnltude of this proposal and ~he constructlcn exp!oszon (residential, commercial), the con=rac~ should contribute to alZ H~ghway ~mprovemen=s necessary to maln=aln the exlsting ~rafflc flcw patterns. In addition, i~ appears =hat thzs development Rancho V~!lage Assessment Di~zr:ct and =herefore reccrr..enl owner ~artic'-pa%e in the assessments for ~he \ Vehicular access connections shall be paved at least within the state highway right of ~'~y. A~ess points to t,he at,abe highway shall be developed in a manner t,hat ~-11 provide -~ight, distance for __ ~ alon& the state highway. -,.-.. Landscaping along the sta~e hig. huay shall be lo~ and forgiving in nat,ure. A left,-turn lane, including any necessary '~ddening, shall be provided on the st,at,e highway at, .... . L/Consideration shall be given ~o the provision, or future provision, of -~ignalization and lighting of t.he interaection of /~ ~/~-~-~ ~4~Z~ and the st,at,e highway. A traffic study indieating on- an~ off-site fio~ ~atterns and vol~es, pnobable ~mpact,s, and proposed mitigation measures shall be prepared. ~dequat,e'ofY-st,reet parking, ~hich does not reqdire backing onto t,he st,ate hi~h~nay, shall be provided. Parking lot, ~hall be deve~ol~,d in a manner that ~-11 not cause any vehicular movenent conflict,s, including parking stall entrance and exit, ~r~thin of t,he ent. ranee from the state highway. Handicap parking shall not be developed in t,he busy driveway entrance area. Care shall be taken ~4~en developing t. his property to preserve and peerpet,uate the exist,ing drainage pattern of the stat,e highway. Particular consideration ~hould be given to cumulat,ive increased st,otto runoff to ~nsu~e that. a highsray drainage L~noblem ~s no~ creat,ed. y necessary noise ~.~J~enuation ~hall be provided as part of the development of ~h~s property. Please refer to attacheC additional cc~ents. REQUEST: A copy of any conditions of approval or revised approval. v/* A copy of any doem~nts providing additional state highmy right of way upon recordation of the map. WE REQUEST THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW DURII~G THE APPROVAL PROCESS: Any proposals to further develop this property. A copy of the traffic or envlromental study. ~_/' A check print of the Parcel or .l)~et Hap. ~/A check print of the Plans. for any. 'improvements krlthtn the state highway right of way. check print of the Grading and ])rainage' Plans for this pro.perry when available. D. Jm ,/.;era&era D, IkF. laea Riverside C~. Planning Dept. 4080 Lemon. St., 9th Riverside, Ca 92501 SUBjECT: t"'~'(Z,Lr-T' ?_u..~.%~-~ "~'~'t.t'~_('~p q'l ) - Lbc,., ']?..'~,/'~'~ The Dtstrict ts responding to your request for comments on the subject project relative to water and/or sewer service. The Items checked below apply to this project review. The subject project: //Zs not Within EMWD's: water service area sewer service area- //'Will be required to construct/provide be served by EM~D: the following facilities tf to !~eWer Servtce A~y and all necessary regionally sized onstte and offstte gravity sewers and appurtenantworks that might (nclude monitoring mnholes, 1tit stations, force- mains, and effluent disposal/use. Sewers will not be allowed along lot lines/private land. Fee payment and participation tn regtonal sewers, treatment, and.effluent dtsposal must be met. Only wastes acceptable to EHHO regulations will be allowed. EASTERN HUNICIPAL HATER DISTRICT Planning Department 204.5 S. SanJacinto Street · Post Office B,,x R.~00 · San Jacinm, California g2.~8]$-i~00 · TelcpIg,ne f7]4) 92.5-7676 January 17, 1989 Bom'd of Richard D. EllfieX President James A~ Darby ~. Vice President Ralph Daily DouZ Ku|ber2 Jon )k landin Jeffrey I, Minider T. C. Rowe Officers: 8tan T. MiTls General Manaler Phillip I, Forbes D~ec~or of F~nance- Treasurer Thomu E McAliester Director of 0perstions & Mainteunce Doris V. Baker District Secretary McCormick · Kidman LeZal Counsel Riverside County Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor l~tverside, California 92501-3657 Subject: Water Availability Reference: Vesting Tract 24135 Gentlemen: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District. Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. If you have any questions, please contact Senga Doherty at (714) 676-4101. Very truly yours, RANCHO C~tTFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Bob Lemons, P.E. Acting Director of Engineeri.ng F012/dpt15f RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT 28061 DIAZ ROAD · POST OFFICE BOX 174 · TEMECULA, CA 92390-0174 * (714) 6764101 · FAX (714) 676-0615 DATE: OUR REF: UNITED STATES POST OFFICE COI~ENTS AND RECONNEND,~TIONS TO: · · RIVERSIDZ COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4080 LEMON ST., 9th FLOOR RIVE.RSIDZ, CA 92501 FUTURE MODE OF DELIVERYz CENTRALIZED CONTACT WITH THE U. S. POSTAL SERVICE IS REQUIRED BY DEVELOPER/BUILDER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION POR DELIVERY TYPE AND LOCATIONS. GROWTH MANAGEMENT COORDINATOR / Southern California Edison Company P. O, BOX 410 1OO LONG BEACH BOULEVARD I,,QNG BEACH. CALIIrO~NIA IOIOI Riverside County Road Department P, O. Box 1090 Riverside, CA 92502 Attention: Subdivision Section SUBJECT: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24135 ra 111 d9 J -IlJe/ January 20. 1989 Please be advised that the division of the property shown on Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24135 will not unreasonably interfere with the ~ree and complete exercise oZ any easement(s) held by Southern Cali~ornia Edison Company within the boundaries of said vesting tentative tract map, This letter should not be construed as a subordination of the Company's rights. title and interest in and to said easement(s). nor should this letter be construed as a waiver of any of the provisions contained in said easement(s) or a waiver of any costs for relocation of affected facilities. In the event that the development requires teloration of facil- ities. if any. on the subject property by right oZ easement or otherwise. the owner/developer will be requested to bear the cost of such relocation and provide Edison with suitable replacement rights. Such costs and replacement rights are required prior =o the performance of the teloration. l~ additional information is required in connection wi=h the above mentioned subject. please call Dennis C. Bazant a= (213) 491-2644. DCB/bJW 16160-24WPC Very Cruly yours, aIO~,~'L . oN cc: Robert Rein. William Frost G A~'S0ciates R: iDE CO UnCu, PL&nninG DEP RClilEn; DATE: December 28, 1988 TO: Assessor Butldtng and Safety Surveyor - Dave Duda Road Department ltealth - Ralph Luchs Ftre Protection Flood Control DIstrict Ftsh& Game U.S. Postal Servtce- Ruth E. Davtdson U.S. Ftsh& HtldllfeServtces COJ~qlSSIC~NER HALT ABRAHAN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PARKS EASTERN ]WJNICIPAL HATER CONPANY RANCHO CALIF HATER CONPANY SO CALIF EDISON S0 CALIF GAS CONPANY GENERAL TELEPNONE CAL TRANS t8 .... ._,... [LS INORE UN]FIi::~"'~C!'iOO"E~"~ISTR:IC, T;.'-- TENECULA UNZON SCHOOL DISTRICT VESTING TRACT 24135 - (Sp Pl) - E.A. 33434 - Bedford Properties - Robert Be~r William Frost & Assoc. - Rancho California Area - First Superr(sofia1 Dtstrtct- AdJacent to l4argar~ta, N. of P~o Ptco Road - SP Zone - 83.5 Acres 325 lots - Schedule A - No Waiver - Nod 118 - A.P. 923-230-002 Please revtew the case described above, along wtth the attached case map, A Land Diviston Comettee meet(ng has been tentatively scheduled for January23, 1989, if dears, It w111 then go to public heartrig, Your co,~ents and recoarnendatlons are requested prtor to January23, 19~9 tn order that we.my fnclude tfiem in the staff report for thTs*parttcular case. Should you have any questions regarding this ttem, please do not besttare to contact Chrts Omsby at 787-1363. Planner CONNDITS: The Elsenote Union Htgh School Dtstrtct facilities are overcrowded and our educational programs seriously tmpacted by Increasing student population caused by new residential, connerctal and industrial construction.. Therefore. pursuant to Caltfornla Government Code Section 53080 of AB 2926 and SB 327, this dtstrtct levtes a fee agatnst all new development pro~ects wtthtn boundaries. DATE: 1/4/89 SIGNATURE PLEASE print name and title -!080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA 92501 (714) 787-6181 Dr. Larry Haw, Superintendent 46-209 OASIS STREET. ROOM 30. INDIO. CALIFORNIA 9220* (619) 342-827 ' INTI.-DIIBAIIII'MINTAL LITI'II:I · telgig February 9, 1989kRrR~~ TO: Chris Orsby, Planner, County Planning IRON: Parc Brewer, Assistant Park Planner, County Pirk:X:~~ SUBJECT: Tentathe Tracts: 24131, 24132, 24134, 24135, 24136, 24137 Vat1Neadws SP 219/EZR 235 The RIverside County Parks Department appreciates the opportunity to review the above refe'enced and offers the folioring coments: Parks and Recreations The DevelopEent of the proposed tracts wtll have miniml impact on existing regtonal park facilities. The County Parks Department also has a county-vide recreation trat1 system. As Indicated by thts department's response to S.P. 219/[ZR 235, Nay 25, 1988 and the Planning Department's conditions of approval October 4, 1988, the developer ns to provtde recreation tratls along the south stde of the Pauba Road right-of-Nay and along the north stde of the De Portola Road rtght-of-~ay. The latter ts to cross De Portola Road at the development's western most boundary, follo~ the boundary due south and extt the stte tnto prtvate property to the ~est. Tentative tracts 24132 and 24134 wtll tmpact the Pauba Road recreation tratl and tentative tracts 24136 and 24137 wtll tmpact De Potrole Road Trat1. The above mentioned tracts make no reference to tratls or tratl easements. 1he Parks Department w111 'require these trail locations to be shorn on a11 tract maps and that they be graded tn an accept4ble manner, The Parks Department also requests that It be 1ts ed as t clearanoe agency for maps and gradtng planntngs dealing vtth this pro;lect, Cultural and Htstorfc Resources' _lentalive iract 24]31, Z414Z, 94134, 24135: Conditional approval ts granted for T.T. 24131, 24132, 24134, and 24135 with regard to Cultural and Htstorfc Resources only. Conditions for Anprova]: Should any prehistoric or htstortc resources be discovered or uncovered during the gradtrig process, all york tn that ·re· wt11 cease until the resource ts evaluated by an archaeologist, or historian and mitigation ts determined and · pproved by the Htstory Dtvtston of the RIverside County Parks'Department and the Archaeological Research Untt,* University of C·]tfornt·, Riverside. Tentative Tract 24136: Conditional approval ts granted for T.T. 24136. Conditions for Approval: At the ttm~ of the alignment of De Porto1· Road the historic resource Rtv-339O-H vas not known. Thts stte was found as · result of the Htstory Dtvtston*s ortgtn·l mtttgutton for conditions1 approval of the EXR #219 (Hay 25 1988). Although Rtv-3390-H ts located south and east of T.T.24136, the realignment of De Porto1· Road must be resolved before final approval of this T.T.24136 is given by the History Division. Tentative Tract 24137: Conditional Approval ts granted for T.T.24137. Conditions for Approval: Street 'A", vhtch cuts south and east off De Porto1· Road, should not be cut or graded, etc., unttl mitigation by data collection ts completed for Rtv-1728, Rtv-1729 and Rtv-3391-H. h T e road vtll tmpact all three of these sttes at present. Any work tn T.T.24137 must ·votd parcel 16 End Rtv-1728 untt1 all archaeological work ts completed tn that ·re·. The use of heavy equipment anJNhere south of De Portola Road must be avoided untt1 all archaeological work is completed and protective measures are taken to ensure the safety and future existence of the culture1 end htstorlc resources tn that area. Protective measures should consist of fenctng around Rtv-3390-H, being sure not to ·11ov fenctng to t act the stte. All movable surface htstortc resources south of De Por~oa~· Road should be photographed, recorded and mpped, after vhtch, they my be moved vtthtn the fenced area at Rtv-3390-H. Hovevet, the project archaeologist must dtrect end supervise the movment end placement of these resources to Rtv-3390-H to Bake sure thetr placement vtll not tapaCt the stte. Although T.T.24137 ts vest of R;Iv-3390-H, the realignment of De Porto1· Road oust be resolved and the above conditions met before ftnal approval ts granted to the Htstory DIvision. ns/lo,i/o376s DIleAMITMINTAL LIt'I'll1 COUNTY OF RIVERBIDE PLANNZNG DEPARTHENT aanuary 31, 1989 T0: ~hrts Oresby - $pectftc Plans FRON: Steven A. Kupferman, Engineering Geologist ~ RE: Tentative Tract 24135 Slope Stability Report No. 89 The following report has been revtewed relattve to slope stability at the subject stte: · Slope Stability Analysts, Tentative Tract 24135, The Keadows at Rancho California, Rancho California, CA,' by Converse Consultants, dated December 5. 1988. Thts report determined that: 1. All slopes proposed for the subject tract at or below a hetght of 35 feet wtll be grossly stable. 2. Both cut and ftll slopes have a htgh potential for eroslon of sandy materials and resultant surftctal Instability, 3. Low strength paraeeters extst for claystones and siltstones. Thts report recommended that: 1. Geologtc Inspection of all cut slopes should be conducted durtng gradtng. 2. Buttress ftlls my be required for cut slopes wtth adverse mtertals or conditions. Proposed slopes st the stte should be planted soon after construction and wt11 requtre maintenance to perform tn a satisfactory manner through ttee. Thts report satisfies the General Plan requirement for a slope stability report. The recomendattons tn thts report shall be adhered to tn the destgn and construction of thts pro3ect. SAK:rd R/VERS/DE COUNTY PLANNZNG DEPARTHE)IT NEGAT]VE DECLARATZON AND NOTZCE OF DETERHZNAT/ON EA No. :g~q~ '~ NEGATIVE DECLARATZON Based on the/nitial Study, tt has been determined that the proposed project will not'have a significant environmental effect· PR~ECT DESCRX P. TZON AND LOCATION: Roger S. Streeter, Planning Director CONPLETED Date 5o~-~ . ~/ Tt 11 e ~4~t)~- Land Div Sch Developable Lots Open Space Lots Existing Zones ~P Changes of Proeosed Zones Only Zoning Acreage ADOPTED Q~ning D~rector ,~Z~' Dev. Ac } /~ O.Sp. Ac t~ HEARING BODY OR OFFZCER g ard of Supervisors lanning Contnission 13 Area Planning Council rllrli~ning Director O (Other) NOTZCE OF DETERNZNATZON ACTION ON PROOECT ir/~proval 13 Disapproval Date Developable Lots 2Z~' Dev.Ac Open Space Lots /9 O.Sp. Ac ch,.9, of AZoP.P;,o--d_l.JII I Zones Only Acreage I The project will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration RIVERS/DE COUNTY PLAttING DEPARTHENT 4080 LEHON STREET, 9TH FLOOR RIVEP~ZDE, CA 92501 1~ ~.~ite Original - County Clerk 2,~1 C--rAry - Came File 3~ ~:~k - Sch~uling 10113) COUNTY STAMP =IiVE: iDE countu, PLAnninG DEPA=IClTIEnC ENVIRONMENTAL, ASSESSMENT FORM: ITANDARD EVALUATION !I~AL k:_:IM!:NT ~,,A,) IIJIdBEP~ 33434 MODULE ~B~s): ~ ~ ~) ~ ~~ Vest~no Tract 24135 ~ ~ Bedford Propoert~ es ~ ~ ~ ~ Chris 0ruby, Planner IZI ~CT ~O~~ within approved Specific Plan No. 219, The site is located PROJECT AREk ACRES R.~. ~ ~ea=~C)!I$ !qldqCEL NO.(s): 923-23D-002 D. EXISTING ZI:~G: SP B ll(PRC~INr,~(:)RK~CE? ~ tqqC)P~~i;le~Ne: IS lt4EPROK~INCC~C)Rm~NCE? F. ~ql=IEE'rRF, FEIIENCE~c The site is located East of Nargarita RB.. ~n fh~ Wp~f~rn portion of Specific Plan No, 219, (3- 8E~I1ON, TOWNSHP, RAN(3EDESCRIPTIONC)RATrA~"~IALECiALDE$CRIPTION: Township 85, Range 2W The site consists of rolling hills which have been tilled, The site is vacant at present. L ~ GillRAt. RAN OPEN IPACl Nmm'D CONSERVATION DEIIONA110N ~] ill~rl:art dlmFmiKljlm lm la'AmasNotDaignsid mOtmn BPace"- Cr,.,,plmtm Sectionm UL N KlN, mclD4mmm~.v~t c:beva. Ccxmmmm,m~m. WK&mmd EamW).Vmml vl. IL ~ (Ctmb One). This kk ,. - "n · t0 romeely to dl it-,,-Y,I h ~ land nee suitability ratings in Section III.B. .& Inmm~wmsamrQerm(N}ueethera~.a~&d'-,-e / ,hannffud/ormissmsmay'dgnman~affectorbeaffg'Wd tylhe r,.,,,_--t Misfu..cldllgumeam eomalmd inlho Cs,,,p,.-hp,,;%e O4meral l:bn- Fcrany iseue marka~yes Ct)wme mkaeorddn~nae~wme,~ . :'e t c~w/ie~f. Bndingoo~bclandanymltigallonmeasumsundor~eceonV. Abo. wherelr~a~ed, HAZARDS Zofms(Fig. Vl.1) · Vt.12 · 1984 NCUZ Report, M.s.F.B.) U R (Fig. VL3) ~ A B C D (1i6, V1.11) (~~~ZoM(FiO. VL1) 13. N Railroad Noifa (Fig. Vl.13-Vl.16) Ps u e Fe. w4; N A e c D Zone Fk; vu) H~ehway No~e (F~O. VU7 - v~9) s,.U_. 7_N e_Y s,N 11), N 11-N   S PS U R FlockM Hazard (On41te Inapection) ConsefvaUm ,Service Soil Surveys) f.~cWon (U.S,DA. Soll C4mseNstion WindErsodm&BIcMsandFi0. Vt-1, OKL46C),kl4.2& On:L484) Dem lnundaim Am Fig, Vl.?) rk~e~ Fig. VL1) (F~ VLS) FiO- VLa) 15. ,. Other Noise NA A B C D (Fig, %/I.11) 16. __N .Pmiect Generate Noise Affect~g Noise Sensitive Uses (FIB. V!.I 1 ) 'i?._.Y_ Noi~,Sensm.~(F"e.V:.ll) 18.__Y NrQualitylmpacts From Project 1 S. ~ PTOje~., Sensitive to Air Quality 20. ,,,JL. Water Quality Impacts From Project 21. H Project Sensitive to Water Quality 22.. __N Hazardous Materials and Wastes 23.N Hazardous Fire Ama (Fig. Vt.30-VI.31) 24.__ Other 25._.._ Other 27__ InarkanASdculbJra!Pmtewe 2L.y.. raN__ REBOURCB ecenk= I~ghwsys Fig, VL4S) HistodcRnoumes~~-~) (R0, VL32-V1,33&VI,46-VL48) (Ps~=rf.::oBic -' Rmam:ao Map) Definluons for Land Use lultabtllty and Noise Acceptability Ratings NA - .NotAI iJe:-ha 8 - 6enemayBultal~ PS - Providma.ySu.abme u - C.,,mrdy .Um, ldde e - Re,Wkmd A - ~ Accept~ 9 - Cc,,,diOc,,-r~A~alle4w C - 6eamnyU. ccap'-No D - LandUoeDi:o~aged ¶. CXmE~f~ANC)CX:)NS~A~M~INAllON(m}: Aoprnv~H ~ecific P1;n Nn ~lq f, LANDUSEP~I Sout6west Territory Land Use ~ ~~~F~: off Pal~a~ Observatory S~ree~ I~gh~n~ ~ ~~~FH: Southwest Area Plan (under study) t ~~~~)~~The comprehensive policies and pro~ect desiqn component described in Soecific Plan Nn. ~lq ,r, ~,h~, tn +h, project. More specifically, the focus of the applicable policies is on Planning Area 17, which encompasses the entire proposal. Fm:mr d r.,,,_:m.'mq, inidcmle wlth mYm r0or n0tN)whelhe m'mY Public lm::ilties encllormefvices m,--~mmy mi~fficm~Uymttmct car be raftmaid by ~ propommi. All mfm'mnomd figatom m cxmtmkwcl in N Gr.,,.4:M'mhm~ Gerwml Ptmn. ~ any imm~ mm~ yes On, write data mourcm~ ,gmn=!m m c~nm~. findings of bci, rand nWt~gmtion remus under Seetim V. PUBUC FACILITIES AND SERVICES 1. Y Clemdmtim~.N.14V.11.)in 10,.N__ kV~PUmreelRequeedRoedm) lie Tmmm ~ N.12 - N.13) W~mm'(Agen=yl,.eeerm) ~meer(Ae,ncyLeamm) Firm ~ Fig. N.1I -NAB) Ihmm kAy memo w,l? - Iv. is) Ichmmmmlm fmlg. IV.1T - IV. II) ~ Wade (Fig. IY.17-1V.181 Ilml~ltR! _/'_~(Imig, IV, ll-IV, l:)) 13,.Y.__. 14Y__. ,,s.L. Equeedmn Trails FaG. NAB - N241 Riv. Co~BO0 Scale Fqu mA dn Tfmjt Idaps) Utaiem Fig. N2S · N.26) I..Ixmdlm (Fig. N.I? - N.18) / Smnmk:mmm tlrmg. N.I? - N.18) AklNNI (Fig. Ll1.2 - L18.4, 1.11,1 - LI&lO · IV,27 - IV,36) Diml%_rm .,d , __m C g, el mlmrt ef lm pmm:mlmct k~k",Mol:md BPmca:Pkm'm',"MEMAr m'IW'mho Vmmemm~P°micY s~w.a", m km m~mm ~m mpm:~c ~ ~ to tm r,s,-pxmk mad or.,n,lYat: I'm 1. 8mmlem~lmrdmdmmflmm~Qm(m~ ~. ffmmmdongdmlnlWmm~.lmlm;--;m~"oo~mIUx~twahmmPoeclmmmm~fdmmd~mS~nm ofthmmp~.~l~mUdocoff~ D. lelorpeftoflipmlecllllelBIn"AmeenotDeeigfkBtedllOplm~",andinotlnm~m~,~'~ laueladkxa 1, 2, t e lind 7. ~/,.,;11 ,'p ,diDnl 4, E, 6 and ? I I Is In · Community Plan. 1. f,.llld ill iOgOry~) I~l:l l]'fy k) 81{Jppoi't h p,.;OllCf pfQiOCL ,4JlO kidicste 18/ld lie type ~. df D.1 ~ Inmm D.2, wl the dlbfmN~ be mmotved st eie lw, ak~gn,;nt sta~e? Exp&ein: 4. ~ Plan des~-mk~s): ~. is 1he m,,,.; ~ee d project ol)nsaant with the pod~ and desjOt'rations of the Community lnot. eqijn: the F,.pKs,s ccvnl:iaNe wi{h exiting and p~Qp;ied sixTouncling land ames? lnot. em;a~ 7. Bmecl en eds kind mimJdy, i the ;,,,.;oPt oormktmnt with h CofmXsmdmlsi~ 6enefmJ Pin? E. lal er Imeld d Ire pedect Me IB in m Open Splice end C~Ter~&ti~ cimigeaJk~ c~.F'-sae e~e following: z bhpmpmd em.ka w.h th. d..k B)?tf nol.. Breed en Ids Inlbl sludy. IB I~ :.,.._._;,-' consimmt sdlh ese Compe~sT'41vm General Pin? · not, ~'t .i~c! by SdmciiOn 8rid Imue Nmni:w Ihoee bsum k:lenUfying V. leFORMATION IOURCEI, FliI:)INO I OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEASURES A ADD. ICIL': lieORMATIO N RE(XIIED BEFORE ENVIRONMENTAL ,eVRF-e*~iENT CAN BE COMPLETED: DATE DATE ADEQUACY 8ECTION/ lIFOIIMATI(:)N NF~IRMATION NFORMATION ISSUE NO. REQVIRED lIEQUESTED RECEIV;D K For each issue roeeked yes (Y) I#der Sections fiLB and IV.B, Identify the Sectbe and Iaue number end do the togowing, lnlN fomat as shown below:. 1. Ust alf addltiond relevanldNa eoutces, lncluding agencles cemutted. 2. hte all find'age of fact reOarding environmental conpens. 3. Slate sped~ ffdtigation manures, If ide~tlfeble without requiring an environmental impact relx~rt (E.I.R.) 4. ff addltioal iniommtion is fequh~ before the environmental eraeat can be completed, reler t~ Subsectb'~ A. 5. ffadditionMeheetsaze feededtocoml:ietethiseection, check the box at the end of the sectionancl attach the ns:see, ry ~N~t~. ~ECTION/ ISSUE NO. IIIB.3 IIIB.4,8 IIIB.17 ~OURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, BNDINGS OFFACT, M~IGATION MEASURES: The General Plan designation for land use suitability pertaining to O~nUndchg~in0 (~ c,,ifmhl~ Pn+=nfiml 4minmrf~ rmn hp mitigmt~d tn an acceptable level throuqh conformance with the Uniform Building Code and County ordinances. Potential sianificant imPaCtS related to slopes and erosion includes the visual appearance of permanently altered land forms, severe erosion of unprotected SlOPeS and possible slope instability. The' potential impact pertaining to visual appearance is mitigated by Development Standards outlined in Section t)IA.6 of ~pecific Plan No. 219. The potential for erosion is being studied in a slope stability study and the development of specific reouirements for alluvial/colluvtal removal at the tract staqe. Temporary groundcover will be provided to prevent erosion during the construction phase a~ indicated in ETR No. 235. Potential noise impacts will be determined by noise studies to be rnnd,rt~d mlnr)43 rnmdw~y~. H(t]gat]on will include heiqht of atteqftion wall and any other reconmnended by the noise study, Monitoring and [ClX)N/ IIIB.18 IIIB .26 INFORMATION ~ ImlklDINQI OF FACT AND MrrI~ATION IdEAIUREI (oontln~d) ~XIRI~.~A0~I~'I[S~LT[D. RNDII~OFFA~r, MITIGA~ON MEASURES: A statement of overriding findings was adopted by the Board of Supervisors for .cumulatlve effects on atr quallty~hiCh cannot be fully mitigated. Although a smal} portion of the Site has soils suitable for agriculture based on the General Plan, tt was detemined in EIR No. 235 that there would be no significant tmpact due to the loss of agricultural land. The ~ite i~ within the historic range of the Stephens' Kar~aroo Rat. A IVR 1 il-ls biological report prepared for The Neadows Specific Plan (SP 219) indicated that nnn~ nf th~ ~m~r~e~ were lockted nn the ~tt~ nf thp tract, Therefore. no mitiqation was requirld. Thp i~mm~ h~u~ hppn di~rmm~pd and addressed ~n ~p~rifir Plan Nn, ?19. Correspondinq environmental review is thoroughly discussed in EIR No. 235. Impacts have been reduced to an acceptable level. **-'1. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DETERMINATION: 'the mmulemS uS not have a emmdicent mmect on Us m~vkor.,.mnt and a NegaUve DeciaraUon my Im Thm ~ mule Imvm · ~ db:t on the mn~bc~~,j,~ k,v.~r. them ~ not M a mignWtoant dJect in Ihim :mine Imp' :m the adjgmtjon tortresume dmmcftmed in 8Kton V have been mpI~WKI to the n PmlWlW Chris on the envkonment and ~n Envin:mnnmonml Kpm~ ~ .... ,~;tm: January/~/1989 CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT FINAL VESTING TRACT NO. ~4135-3 DATE: November ~3.1993 Streets and Drainage Water Sewer TOTAL Faithful Performance Security $ 308,000 69,500 70.000 $ 447.500 Material & Labor Security $ 154,000 34,750 35.000 $ ~3,750 Maintenance Retention (10% for one year) (or Bonds if work is completed) $ 97,700 (Based on total improvements of S977,000) Develooment Fees Monument Security City Traffic Signing & Striping Costs RCFC Drainage Fee (N/A) Signalization Mitigation Fee - SMD #9 Road & Bridge Benefit Fee Other Developer Fees Checking & Insoection Fees Plan Check Fee Inspection Fee Due Monument Inspection Fee Fee Paid to Date (Credit) Total Inspection/Plan Check Fees Due 35,500 0 0 14,550 0 0 23,720.19 32,065.39 1,147.58 56,933.16 0 -4- pwOb"lagdrptW4%0111%24135-3.egn 010494 NOV-15-93 H0~11:49 C(F" ~ES~ FPI iX 714755F"~ P. 05 Ocxtober 28, Z993 XE .,. Bryon Noree]l IWJ:)C~ INC. 27555 XneZ Road 8u,ite 2oo TeaacuZa. CA 92591 Re: Paloma del sol · Grant Deed Dear Mr. Noreen: Devalopaent agreesent ;--el~tance Park located in Plarddng Area Sections 12.5 and 12.6 of 0*valop~nt~t provide that Xespfwoulddevelop and grant in feet o the City an 8 acre park located vlthin PlanningArea 37 (=PA-3?a). Thepark has now been completed, and ShavnNels~n, thsCumunltySarvicls Director, had orlginallypropossdtoreceesendaeceptanceof the grant deed at the October 26 1993 CouncllNee~_ng Nowever the City discove,~ed that there ~,m a SG33,000 lien ~o~ kBseB~m'e~ ' District No. 159 (aAD 159") on Parcel No. 2 of ParoelMap 23432, which Parcel includes the Park site, ar. Nels0~askedCsabeXo of your cosparty to remove this encumbrance. ~hsn Nr, Xo refused, Mz'. Nelson took the park aooe~ of~ the October 261h Ageride, On behalf of the City of Teseculao X mR. asking you to reconsider this decision and arrange Zor the grant of the park P. 07 October ::18, 1993 Page 2 On behalf of the City of -,~xe~,a-, I am asking you to reconsider this declsioa mad arrange-for the grant of the park tree of this entombcanoe. ~he basis of this request ls am foll~sx 1. Sectjan Z2.S of tie DevsloSmsnt .t provides that K--. ~x is to grant the park is fee to the ~~-Civll Code section 1113 provides ~bat ~neVer a grant deed is executed conveying a fee st~ple estate, there is an isplisd covenant that at the time of execution, the estate is sfree fram done, made or suffered by the grantor, or any parson claiming under him. w Civil Code 8e(~tion 1114 defines wencuadarancmss to include "taxes, assessments and all liens upon reel property. 2 ,. It As apparently St. xo's contention that the City should be responsible for the ~D 159 lion because the creation of the park acreage resulted in a loss of development units. Hoeever, it no~ appears that the park will not prevent Xesper from a~hieving the 590 unit targe~ density for PA-6. Developsent of Palm del Sol is governed by the Palm Del Sol Specific Plan ("SP"). P&-~ of the 2P, ~-No. l, had a target density of 590 units at · density of 15 du/aore spread over 37.8 mores. Amendment N~. 3 of the 8P provided for an 8 acre park and 492 ullits at a density of 16.5 d~/acre spread over 29.8 acres. upon reviewing this matter with the kssessmmat DistriCt Engineer for M} 159, we learned that the actual total acreage of Pl-l, PA-6 and PA-37 is 83.13 mores. However, a~ to the Specific Ples, PA-1, PA-6 and Pa-3? are cnnnalatlvely ?4.2 acre. The difference betwees the t~o is 8,89 ac~es, This could yield an additional 146.69 dwelling units a= 16.5 du/acre, or a total of 638.39 units in PA-6. NOV-IS-93 HON 1]-'49 BRS CO"""' )t:SA October 28 · 1993 Page 3 FAX NO. 714755F~'q P. 06 Zt Is my undarm~ that gemper My prefer to allocate this additional egreage ta t.n,~-:-'~,c the part to 9.5 acres and 1natease the oelmereJal Rareage In PA-1. ]~gax~lless, these additional acres provlde rapar ~ttal develolment potan 1el, and are the approprInte place for Xempe~ ~o reallocate ~evZy fonnA 9 acre. 3. Zt has been icesmerit Bngluoe~ f:or iD 159 to reallocatm any assessment beZn~ PFoi~,, withIn the subdivIsion when a pezk has was3:, y ~i aim del $ol. tbam t~ts PMap°' r~o~ld be a~lled be~e. Mo~.~v--, ~icq~larly aL~roprlate given t!~t b adAltt0~l ) acres vllZ eve aZte~ the useassent 18 mlZooated. ~o U~e end, the City is applylnq to kD 159 to zealloeate 4. Finally, ve bare also discovered that t~e~e ~ enouabz~ on t~e pa~. Campanula Way Is a 1. -'-ded street that has been reallgned to ab~b the park. 2b reoarded stzeet runs through the park. k/'ozm the park my be Kernper must apply tor neation of so/de (~!p4~m kit dedication of the new allgnmant. again, on ]Mhalf of the city, and partleularly the adults and chlldzen who will le usezs of thls )azk, m~ to curs th~ breach of the Developaent ~greement, I request that you arrange for the removml of the usmsmment lien fm the park, and the realignment of Campanula Way. HOV-I5-93 HOH 11:51 B$1S (XF""' liSA FP.X HO. 714755F"'q P. 08 ~ 28, 1993 Page · Please Ieel fee to call me if you have any ~ions or if I my be el further assistance, Scott Y. Field c~y AL~my Mr. Shawn Nelson, Directmr of Community Services Dennis _~14- ek, ls~. (pe~ 2e~tiun 23 of the Development ~reement) Dennis O'Netl, Esq. (Ix~ Mien 23 o£ 4~e Development XgTeeme~t) NOV-IS-g3 HON ]1:47 ~ C(Y"" I~SA ~, I NO. 71475'5F''t] P, 03 27555 Ynn Road, Sadle2{~Tnnn:ula. Caltfomia 92591, 9091694-0666 · F'ax:9091694-0749 Nm'nnber 4, 1993 Mr. DaveDixmn City of Tem~c,d- 43174 Businns Pa~ Drive Te, n,-eql~t. CA 92~90 Re: :Phirim. del ~ On Novemlxz 1. 1993, Iwc~v,.d aleu~from Ci~Attonmy~Frjd nameruing the Paloma dd Sol ~ A~,t, acd and ~he ~en,~,--, by the City So m:ept Patk located in Planning At~ 6. luhil lelXer. lvfr. l:ieldpu,iru,.is to,.,..~.,s~fied:e Cky in advisingmedatl~e t~mafcrofll~mbJeetPatkwill notbeaccqmsdwtthan~AD 1~9 refusalbylimCitytoacceptthclra_n_n_n_n_n_n_n_n_n_~oftlmpatlc. lwottldlnm-Ioconncntbrie~yon eachof these issues. Mr. Fr. ld indicates that ~-$ Io Section 12.5 of our Dev~ Ag,,.cnz~ with caum to be ded~ut~ in f~...to City aM City sgms lo a:cq~patk laM,..., Section 12.8 bCity. Itwas only th=n~t~~. Fields' letter iqdk. wHngthataFantdeed means that the t, nlx.-ty is m be "free fkmn e,rnmbram:es." h--~t~i~ I!s: ~.,.~fS,n,,nt district tien. We can find nothing h the Devetol~ Ar.n.c~-.l, mt an3r of our files, Milch i~icatc th= C~ ~ oer ~ I~ com~ ml ~ tlj mS jeer Rak fi'ec and clear of any "~".~--.,,,-~' ]je'n. th~ city is under an afrmm~ve oblig~,~m to sazel~ te Park and ta,,tkic all of the fledits wcarce~titledto. ~ne only obligation placcd upon ~ was to pmvide tbc park with cettaini~-,dtbentouamfertlmpatktotheCity. PurmmnttoScctionl2.~, the City is under affirmative obligation to now actz~ the Padr. NOV-15-93 HON 11:48 November 4o 199~ FAX NO. 7147555' P. 04 Nen, Mr. Field hvaP~es that ~c City is apply~ w ,~--es~ew ~ 1~9 We "reallocaZ" Ils -~s~s~w,4. I !mve dmsdy noiifiea Mr. ]kazl '%lmmpou of Webb & Associates that w/riDe the C'ity nmy inquin: canrzruioi issues mhmd to fits/k,-seasn~mt DBnia, itcertminlYcaonot~m~.,,,ortsbnymc6onwlaLreS~soZzWmymatK4anZzr owns, Finally, Mr. Fzld i~k-ales hal tins is ~v~np-hrm~m fiz Park ffia~ lobe resolved. lnfaa, Mr. Koofour offios lms wostzxl wil~fiae Cily innsolving lhsl Ocwber27, ~993, Mr. Oisp of~e C/sy mnvised~. Komsso~ow~zlm~is should proceed m nssolve ~ Csml~smh Way issue. Wc ale h Unless you ma advise me of any 4o~,,,,,em~tion ff pmvi~. us say docsmpm~ which !esdW aconlntry~slalzzlhemin, fi~Cilysmstmazlzbu~ofl~palkas Citymustnowgramgaefeeaediisswwesreenddwiw. Shn~ely, KEMPER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO. ITEM NO. 24 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager ,~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer January 11, 1994 Status Report on Winchester Road Bridge Widening and Loop Ramp, Overland Overcrossing, and Margarita Road Widening North of Rancho California Road RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND: A brief status report of each project follows: Winchester Road Looo Discussions have been completed with representatives of the Federal Highway Administration and Caltrans regarding the widening of the Santa Gertrudis Bridge. It was verbally agreed that the City would be granted a design exception to the required transition length of the northbound merging lane thereby eliminating the need to widen the Santa Gertrudis Bridge. The project report was submitted to the Caltrans District Office on December 14, 1993, and the bridge plans will be submitted to the Caltrans Division of Structures in Sacramento on January 20, 1994. A project schedule is attached for your review. Additionally a submittal to Caltrans to obtain an encroachment permit for Winchester Road west of I-15 is scheduled for January 21, 1994. The project includes widening Winchester adjacent to Jack-In-The-Box to provide an additional travel lane and widening the corner section at the end of the south bound off ramp to improve right hand turning movements adjacent to the Car Wash. Overland Drive Overoass Caltrans required the horizontal alignment be revised to remove a curve from the portion of the structure that they will maintain. Our consultant, J.F. Davidson Associates Inc., is now completing the project report and design work. A schedule is attached for your review. -1- ped)S~gdrpt~94~011 l~winbw.mr 010594 Maroarita Road Widenino Verbal agreement has been reached with representatives of Kemper Community Development Company regarding reimbursement of the construction costs associated with the widening of the east side of Margarita Road between Rancho California Road and La Serena Way to ultimate width. The City will loan Kemper the funds necessary to construct the roadway and Kemper will reimburse the City through s surcharge on building permits. Currently, Kemper is preparing a street light plan and obtaining construction bids. The City Attorney's office is preparing the reimbursement agreement and it will be brought to the Council for approval. FISCAL IMPACT: None -2- pwOb'~gdrptl141D111%winbw.nv 010594 WINCHESTER ROAD INTERCHANGE Project Report Actual Submittal Anticipated Approval December 14, 1993 April 4, 1994 Bridge Plans Submittal Anticipated Approval January 20, 1994 June 3, 1994 PS &E 95% Submittal Submit to HQ (After District Approval) Submit Final PS & E December 17, 1994 April 7, 1994 June 3, 1994 Begin Bid Package Preparation/ Sign Agreement R/W Acquisition Approval Advertise Award Contract Begin Construction June 20, 1994 October 17, 1994 December 19, 1994 January 4, 1995 -3- pwOS~gdrpt~94~0111%winbw.mr 010594 OVERLAND OVERCROSSING ~,, Proiect Reoort Actual Submittal Anticipated Approval February 28, 1994 June 24, 1994 Bridge Plans Submittal Anticipated Approval March 31, 1994 July 15, 1994 PS&E 95% Submittal Submit to HQ (After District Review) Submit Final PS & E March 18, 1994 April 15, 1994 September 12, 1994 Begin Bid Package Preparation/ Sign Agreement RRV Acquisition Approval Advertise Award Contract Begin Construction September 26, 1994 January 23, 1995 March 20, 1994 April 3, 1995 -4- pwOb"~gdfpt~94%011 l~winbw.nv 010594 ITEM 25 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 1993 A special meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order ' Tuesday, November 30, 1993, 6:35 P.M., Murrieta City Hall Council Chambers, 26442 Beckman Court, Murrieta. Vice President Jeff Stone presiding. PRESENT: 4 DIRECTORS: Mufioz, Parks, Roberts, Stone ABSENT: I DIRECTORS: Birdsall Also present were City Manager David Dixon, Assistant City Manager Woody Edvalson, City Attorney Scott Field and City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMt:NT None CONSFNT CALENDAR It was moved Director Parks, seconded by Director Roberts to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion carried as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 1. 4 0 1 Minutes 1.1 1.2 DIRECTORS: Mu~oz, Parks, Roberts, Stone DIRECTORS: None DIRECTORS: Birdsell Approve the minutes of the meeting of November 9, 1993; Approve the minutes of the meeting of November 23, 1993. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT None DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY S;RVICES REPORT None CSDMIN11/30/93 -1 - 12/1 o/93 COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION NOVEMBFR 30. 1993 BOARD OF DIRI:CTORS RI:PORTS None ADJOURNMs:NT It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Roberts to adjourn at 6:40 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried. The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District will be held on Tuesday, December 14, 1993, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. ATTEST: President Patricia H. Birdsall City Clerk June S. Greek C81)MIN11/30/93 -2- 12/10/93 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT HELD DECEMBER 14, 1993 A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:35 PM, 22816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. President Patricia H. Birdsall presiding. PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Mu~oz, Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Birdsall ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None Also present were General Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field and Agency Secretary June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMFNT None given. CONSFNT CAI mMDAR It was moved by Director Mui~oz, seconded by Director Parks to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-3. The motion was unanimously carried. Combining Ralance Sheet as of Seotember 30. 1993 and Statement of Revenues. Exoenditures and Chennes in Fund ealance for the Three Months Fnded Seotember 30. 1993 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1993 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1993. 2. Solicitation of Construction Bids for the Soorts Park SIooe Reoair Proiect (PW93-06) RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the Sports Park Slope Repair Project (PW93-06). e Award of Professional Services Contract for Materials Testing During the Constr-ction of Pala ~ommunitv Park (PW93-O3CSD) RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Award a Professionel Services Contract to Geotachnical & Environmental Engineers, Inc. (GEE) to provide material testing services Minuas/121483 -1- 01/04/94 CSD Minutes December 14. 1993 during the construction of Pale Community Perk, Project No. PW93- 03CSD, in the amount not to exceed $21,210 and authorize the President to execute the contract. DISTRICT BUSINESS 4. Election of President It was moved by Director Roberrs, seconded by Director Mufioz to nominate Director Jeff Stone as President of the TCSD to preside until the end of calendar year 1994. The motion was unanimously carried. 5. Election of Vice President It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Roberrs to nominate Director Patricia H. Birdsell to serve as TCSD Vice President until the end of calendar year 1994. The motion was unanimously carried. 6. Loma l inda Park Imorovements - Phase II Recreation Superintendent Herman Parker presented the staff report. It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Stone to approve staff recommendation as follows: 6.1 Appropriate $225,000 from Quimby Fees to the Capital Projects Account for the construction of Loma Linda Park - Phase II. The motion was unanimously carried. It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Stone to reconsider Item No. 2. The motion was unanimously carried. Solicitation of Construction Bids for' the Sports Park SIooe Reoair Project (PW 93-06) Director Parks questioned the amount of expenditure in this area, and asked why such · small percentage is being refunded by FEMA. Finance Officer Mary Jane McLarney explained that FEMA auditors have to relate actual damage to the slope during the rainstorm and the estimate is for complete repair of the slope. Director Parks asked that this matter be continued to allow Board Members the opportunity to review the plans and space for this work. Minetee/121493 -2- 01/04/14 CSD Minutes December 14. 1993 It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Stone to continue to the meeting of January 11 th. The motion was unanimously carried. GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Dixon General Manager Dixon excused the absence of Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson due to illness and complimented the Community Services Department staff for preparing and stepping in at last moment. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson None given. BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Parks to adjourn at 8:47 PM to a meeting on January 11, 1994, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. Patricia H. Birdsell, President ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk/Board Secretary ~ell 21492 -3- O!/04494 ITEM NO. 2 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Community Services Board of Directors Dave Dixon, General Manager January 11, 1994 Amendment to the Solicitation of Construction Bids for the Sports Park Slope Repair Project (PW93-06). PREPARED BY: (~hawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the Sports Park Slope Repair Project(PW93-06). BACKGROUND: As a result of the concerns raised at the December 14, 1993 Council Meeting and the subsequent discussions with staff, the project will be revised so that the existing 1.5: 1 slope will be reconstructed at a slope of 2:1 to increase the stability of the slope and reduce the potential for erosion. Additionally, the materials excavated from the channel will be stockpiled onsite and utilized for the proposed slope reconstruction. This will result in the following changes to the engineer's estimate. The revised engineer's estimate for the slope repair is $148,779 (formerly $135,079); for the associated landscaping and irrigation is $42,600; and for the channel improvements is $116,730 (formerly $140,040). The total estimated cost for construction of the items included in the base bid and additive bids "A" and "B" is $308,109. FISCAL IMPACT: The project is being funded through Fund Balance in the TCSD - Community Services, Parks, and Recreation budget. The slope repair and channel improvement portions of the project are eligible for reimbursement from the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA). The original reimbursement estimate prepared by FEMA in conjunction with the City is $6,513 for the slope repair and $46,132 for the channel improvements. -1- pw13%agdl'p694%0111%pw93-OG,eup 0105 ITEM NO. 3 APPROVA CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: David F. Dixon, General Manager DATE: December 10, 1994 SUBJECT: Contract Amendment-California Landscape, Inc. PREPARED BY: ~ RECOMMENDATION: Bruce A. Hartley, Maintenance Superintendent That the Board of Directors: Amend contract for landscape maintenance services with California Landscape, Inc. to include the addition of Paloma Del Sol Park. BACKGROUND: Paloma Del Sol Park was built for dedication to the-City of Temecula by Kemper Development Corporation. The City will be responsible for the maintenance of the park as of January 26, 1994. The contractor currently responsible for maintaining the City's Neighborhood Parks is California Landscape. This contractor submitted the lowest bid for park maintenance when the public bid was released in March, 1993. It is recommended that the maintenance of Paloma Del Sol Park be added to the existing contract. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost for the maintenance of Paloma Del Sol Park will be 93582.81 per month. Sufficient funds have been budgeted in the existing Community Services, Parks and Recreation Budget for Fiscal Year 1993-94. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES The Agreement dated May 11, 1993, between the City of Temecula, and California Landscape, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as "Agreement") is hereby amended as follows: RE: Landscape Maintenance Services Section 1 Term of the Agreement is extended through June 30, 1995. Section 2 The Scope of Work is hereby amended by adding the following: Landscape Maintenance Services per City of Temecula Specifications for the following area: Paloma Del Sol Park. Section 3 Compensation for services shall be total compensation of all services described in the Amendment and shall be payable monthly not to exceed $3,582.81. Section 4 All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same. The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above written. CONTRACTOR By: By: California Landscal;)e, Inc. APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF TEMECULA David F. Dixon General Manager Scott F. Field, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk 3b~o~traet~cmi2.am, ln ITEM NO. 4 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: David F. Dixon, General Manager DATE: January 11, 1994 SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Acceptance of Grant Deed for Paloma Del Sol Park - Kemper Community Development Company. Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant That the Board of Directors: Accept a grant deed from Kemper Community Development Company for Paloma Del Sol Park, a 9.50 acre sports complex within the Paloma Del Sol Development, subject to the vacation proceedings of Campanula Way. BACKGROUND: On December 8, 1992, the City Council approved an Amendment and Restatement of the Development Agreement between the City of Temecula and Bedford Development concerning the Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan. Pursuant to this amended Development Agreement (PA92-0013), Bedford was required to deliver to the City a fully developed eight (8) acre sports park complex within Planning Area 37 of Specific Plan No. 219. As sucessors in interest to Bedford Development, Kemper Community Development Co. is dedicating a 9.50 acre park, named Paloma Del Sol Park, to the City. The park is located at the southeast corner of De Portola Road and Campanula Way. The amenities of the park include two (2) baseball fields with soccer overlays, ball field lighting, bleachers, a 1200 square foot rest room/snack bar facility, picnic tables, benches, signage, drinking fountains, refuse receptacles, walkways and on-site parking. The information regarding the vacation of Campanula Way has been submitted to the Department of Public Works and is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the City Council on January 25, 1994. FISCAL IMPACT: Pursuant to the amended Development Agreement, Kemper Community Development Co. will receive a maximum credit of ~2,000,000 towards City Public Facilities Fees for developing Paloma Del Sol Park and a future 7.44 acre park site based upon actual improvement costs. Based on the preliminary construction cost estimate for this park, the Board of Directors approved a preliminary fee credit of ~ 1,368,000 towards City Public Facilities Fees. Following a final review and verification of all construction costs associated with the development of this park, staff will be forwarding a consent item to the Board of Directors which will identify the final credit amount to be received by Kemper for City Public Facilities Fees. ATTACHMENTS: Site/Location Map Copy of Grant Deed ,v,.,., I · ALLEY UNRE*LO ~l H',~ ] CHRIS TI#N H$ I L% / Dd Sol Park" $ SUNm I"'-. PALOMA DEL SOL PARK Site/Location Map 1 EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY City of Temecula PER GOV'T CODE § 6103 AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Office of the City Clerk City of Temecula 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE GRANT DEED The undersigned grantor declares: FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, K/~DC, Inc., a CalifoTnia corporation hereby grants to the CITY OF TEMECULA, a body corporate and politic, the following described real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Executed on October l lth , 19 93 , at Temecula California. (Signature) Csaba F. Ko, Vice PresidenE ~ (Title) 3;/letms/grBneeed 013192 ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE On October 11, Z993 before me, the undersigned, A Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally appeared Csaba :F. I(o , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. r IIf ~ C .T.,A G. ~ My commission expires Oct. Z4. Zg~ ~ CONSENT The City of Temecula hereby consents to the grant of real property set forth above. City of Temecula By: J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor ATTEST: By: June S. Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: ' Scott F. Field, City Attorney 3~formNgranieed 013112 ~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PARK SITE THOSE PORTIONS OF CAMPANULAWAY, AND PARCELS 2 AND 3 OF PARCEL MAp 23432 RECORDED IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 159, PAGES 38 THROUGH 61 INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. COMMENCING AT A POINT AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 23432, WITH THE CENTERLINE OF DE PORTOLAROAD, SAID POINT BEING NORTH 73'26'04" EAST, 319.95 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF MARGARITA ROAD AND DE PORTOLAROAD AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY AND RAVING A RADIUS OF 1,200.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF DE PORTOLA ROAD AND SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 40'24'52", 846.44 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING THE CENTERLINE OF DE PORTOLAROAD, SOUTH 56°58'48'' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY 100 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID DE PORTOLA ROAD, 'SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY 100 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE NORTH 33°01'12" EAST A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND RAVING A RADIUS OF 1,150.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVETHROUGH A CENTRALANGLE OF 01'28'23", 29.57 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTHEASTERLY 100 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, SOUTH 51°41'43'' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 197.34 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 48°03'26"EAST, A DISTANCE OF 370.35 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 39°28'00'' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 733.15 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE RAVING A RADIUS OF 950.00 FEET, TO WHICH A RADIAL BEARS SOUTH 25°44'32'' WEST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 31°40'28'', 525.18 FEET; THENCE NORTH 32°35'00'' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 43.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 10°46'22'' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 31.58 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE RAVING A RADIUS OF 1,250.00 FEET, TO WHICH A RADIAL BEARS SOUTH 35'52'13" RAST, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON SAID SOUTHEASTERLY 100 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF DE PORTOLA ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY 100 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21°06'35", 460.54 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING- LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PARK SITE (CONT.) CONTAINING 9.51 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT PARCEL INCLUDES PORTION OF "CAMPANULA WAY" AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 23432, WHICH IS TO BE "VACATED" PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: JAMES A. DRENON, JR. P.L.S. 6153 EXP. 3/31/94 -~'~'CA~ ;~ ...... DATE ../- Te4CT ~ // ITEM 5 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: David F. Dixon, City Manager DATE: January 11, 1994 SUBJECT: Acceptance of the Quitclaim Deeds for the Parking Lot adjacent to Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park. PREPARED BY: (~ i~r Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Accept the quitclaim deeds from the Murdy Foundation and Kemper Community Development Company for the parking lot adjacent to Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park. BACKGROUND: On October 26, 1993, the Board of Directors approved the acceptance of a grant deed from the Presley Companies for Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park, a nine-acre community park within Tract No. 23267-2. However, the actual transfer of the park to the City did not include the parking lot, which is a .26 acre portion of adjacent property not owned by the developer. The parking lot has been completed and quitclaim documents have since been obtained from the Murdy Foundation and Kemper Community Development Company which transfer fee-title interest and easement rights for this area to the City. The enclosed quitclaim documents have been reviewed by staff to insure that all legal requirements have been satisfied. A policy of title insurance has also been provided by the developer to accompany the transfer of title to the City. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of maintaining the parking lot has beenincluded in the TCSD FY 1993/94 budget for Community Services, Parks, and Recreation· The acquisition costs of the parking lot were paid in full to the Murdy Foundation by the developer, the Presley Companies. ATTACHMENTS: Vicinity/Location Map Quitclaim Deed from the Murdy Foundation Quitclaim (easement) Deed from KRDC, Inc. R:;YeemOML~KH.Iq(I 1221R EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY City of Temecula PER GOV'T CODE § 6103 AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Office of the City Clerk City of Temecula 431'74 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Space above this line for recorder'$ use QUITCLAIM DEED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, GEORGE E. TROTTERj AND MAXINE MURDY TROTTER, Co-Trustees of the Trotter Trust, established May 6, 1974, MAXINE MURDY TROTTER, Successor Trustee of the John A. Murdy, III, Separate Property Trust, established February 10, 1976, and MURDY FOUNDATION, a California nonprofit corporation, do hereby REMISE, RELEASE AND FOREVER QUITCLAIM to THE CITY OF TEMECULA, a body corporate and politic, the following described real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California: See EXHIBIT "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. Dated:/D.-_'Tn- ~ ~ GEORGE E. TROTTER AND MAXINE MURDY TROTTER, Co-Trustees of the Trotter Trust, established May 6, 1974 ~: _~_..~ ~ ~ ~~ MAXINE MURDY TRC~(~ER, Co-Trustee 1 O/13/93 - 1 - ACKNOWLEDGMENTS STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ~ On /0-,20- ~:/ personally appeared ) ) ss. ) · before , Notary Public, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature i~M ~)tA'!.d~99M12 ! 7 Zz (Seal) STATE OF CALIFORNIA 0 n JO ~..~ ' ?3 personally appeared ) ) ss. ) , before me, Notary Public, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which Signature the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. ~7 (Seal) 1 o/13/93 -3- MAXINE MURDY TROTTER, Successor Trustee of the John A. Murdy, III, Separate Property Trust, established February 10, 1976 By: R TT Successor Trustee MURDY FOUNDATION, a California nonprofit corporation By: Geo~e E. TrotterJ CONSENT The City of Temecula hereby consents to the quitclaim of real property set forth above. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Ron Roberos, Mayor ATTEST: By: June S. Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Scott F. Field, City Attorney 10/13/93 -2- EXHIBIT "A" "" THAT PORTION OF LITTT.~. TEMECULA RANCHO IN ~ CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ENTITE "PARTITION MAP OF THE LITTLE TEMECqILA RANCBO", ON FILE IN ~ OFFICE OF ~ COUNTY CLERK OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN ACTION NO. 5756 IN ~ SUPER/OR COURT, OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOr.TOWS: BEGINNING AT AN A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THAT PROPERTY DESCIQTR~D IN DEED TO JOHN A. MURDY, JR. AND NORMAL. MURDY PER INSTI~UMENT NO. 123991, RECORDED DECEMBER 30, 1966, O.R., IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID RIVERSIDE COUNTY, SAiD POINT ALSO BEING THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 184 OF TRACT NO. 23267-2 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 237 PAGES 63 THROUGH 69 OF MAPS, OF SA/D RIVERSIDE COUNTY, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON ~ ARC OF A 1200.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 31o18'19- WEST; THENCE SOUTw~ASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12°24 '51" A DISTANCE OF 260.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, RADI3~T.T.y, SOUTH 18°53 '28'' WEST 40.00 FEET TO A POINT ON TWR. ARC OF A NON- TANGENT 1240.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORT~-ASTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SA/D POINT BEARS SOUTH 18 ° 53 ' 28" WEST; THENCE NORTHWEST~y ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14 ° 43 ' 20" A DISTANCE OF 3 18.62 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THAT EASEMENT GRANTED TO ~ CITY OF TEMECULA PER INSTI~~ NO. 303462, RECORDED AUGUST 17, 1992, 0.R., IN THE OFFICE 'OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID RIVERSIDE COUNTY, SA/D LINE ALSO BEING THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT 76.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 17o57'26'' WEST; T~'~NCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGT.~. OF 49 "16 ' 15" A DISTANCE OF 65.36 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARC~r. CONTAINS 0.259 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED F;~ETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. 14 / / / ( VICINITY MAP NO SCALE 531'lS'lq'WCl~) OROBBT M'IIAZ) I SCALE N r-2oo' Engineers · Planners · Surveyors M50 II Camla~ hi. Sglt~ ~lrllbld, CeiUor,,I s 9~008 (exe) ~e - 184 .,~c3 N "~ 05 II~OlCATES QUITCLAIM DEED Ai;2EA II~DICATES 44' ACCESS ~PEI~ INSTlaJvl~rr NO. 123~91 I;~COI~DED 12-30-66, OJ~. A POInTION Of= LITTLE TEtvECLLA I~ANCI40 KNOWN AS PAi~TITION MAP OF TIE 1,1TTLE T!SME~ I~ANCI,~' ON FILE IN TIE CX=~ICE OF TIE COLINI'Y CLEi~ OF TIE COLIVff OF SAN DIEGO. STATE OF CALIF<XZNIA IN ACTION NO. 5756 IN TIE COLI~T OF SAID SAN DIEeO COLNT~. F. XHIBr!' EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY City of Temecula PER GOV'T CODE § 6103 AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Office of the City Clerk City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Space above this line for recorder's use QUITCLAIM DEED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, KRDC, Inc., a Corporation, successor in interest to Rancho California, a Partnership, composed of Kaiser Rancho California, a Inc., a Corporation; Temecula Properties, Inc., a Corporation; and Temecula Investment Company, a Corporation, do hereby REMISE, RELEASE AND FOREVER QUITCLAIM to THE CITY OF TEMECULA, a body corporate and politic, the following described real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California: See EXHIBIT "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. KRDC, Inc., a Corporation, ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE On October 14, 1993 before me, the undersigned, A Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally appeared Sr~razt C. Noreen , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. CYNTHIA G. ZAJD Notary PuDlic California CONSENT The City of Temecula hereby consents to the grant of real property set forth above. ATTEST: City of Temecula By: Ron Roberos, Mayor By: June S. Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: ~ ~ F F Scott . ield, Attorney 3clferrn$/grBndeed 013192 EXE/BIT "A" THAT PORTION OF LITTLE TEMECULA RANCHO IN ~ CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ENTITLED "PARTITION MAP OF THE .LITTLE TEMECULA RANCliO", ON FILE IN Th'R OFFICE OF ~ COUNTY CLERK OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN ACTION NO. 5756 IN ~ SUPERIOR COURT, OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOTx<3WS: BEGINNING AT AN A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY Ia2rE OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN DEED TO JOHN A. MURDY, JR. AND NORMAL. MURDY PER INSTRUM]~-NT NO. 123991, RECORDED DECEMBER 30, 1966, O.R., IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SA/D RIVERSIDE COUNTY, SA/D POINT ALSO BEING TEE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 184 OF TRACT NO. 23267-2 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 237 PAGES 63 THROUGH 69 OF MAPS, OF SAID R/VERSIDE COUNTY, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON ~ ARC OF A 1200.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, A RADIAL L/NE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 31°18'19'' WEST; TTtENCE SOUT;r~-ASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12°24 '51" A DISTANCE OF 260.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, RADLAT.T.y, soErlvJ~ 18o53,28,, WEST 40.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A NON- TANGENT 1240.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTw~.ASTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SA/_D POINT BEARS SOUTH 18 ° 53 ' 28" WEST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLy ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE ~OF 14 o 43 · 20" A DISTANCE OF 3 18.62 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ]OUTHWESTERLy LINE OF THAT EASEMENT GRANTED TO ~ CITY OF TEMECULA PER INSTRUMENT NO. 303462, RECORDED AUGUST 17, 1992, 0.R., IN THE OFFICE'OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID RIVERSIDE COUNTY, SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT 76.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 17~57'26,, WEST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGT.~. OF 49 o 16 ' 15" A DISTANCE OF 65.36 F~TRT TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCRT. CONTAINS 0.259 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART FRREOF. "' No. .aSg4 "" 14 531'la'lq'WC:R.) 184 0 · NO SCALE /,q I N r-=oo' ,'BOBBY ,fBAD tINTOIl hEineera · Planners. S,irveyora 88Bo El Carolrio hal. Suite 200 (8lO) 436 - i210 II',DICAT'c,S 4.4' ACCESS EASISMENT PEi; INS~ NO. 123991 I;ECO;DED 12-~D-66, O.I;. ^OC'4P"88 ~ A POiZTION Oft LITTLE TEiVlECLLA I~ KNOWN AS PARTITION MAP OI= T1-E 'LITTLE TEIVLR::::I.I.A I;ANCI-IO' ON I=ILE IN TIE CR=ICE OF TI-.E SAN DIEQO. STATE Of= CALIF'tDliNIA IN ACTION NO. 5756 IN TIE ,.qUPEi;ICE CC)LEI' OP SAID SAN DEGO COt. NTY'. ITEM NO. APPROVA~~ CITY ATTORNE FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Community Services Board of Directors FROM: David F. Dixon, General Manager DATE: January 11, 1994 SUBJECT: Completion and Acceptance of the Riverton Park Improvements Project No, PVV93-04CSD PREPARED BY: Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer -Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the Board of Directors direct the City Clerk to: a. File the Notice of Completion end release the Performance Bond. be Accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract value upon acceptance of the improvements. Ce Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after acceptance of the improvements if no liens have been filed to that date. That the Board of Directors authorize the Director of Community Services to accept the park site improvements upon completion of the maintenance period. BACKGROUND: On August 10, 1993, the City Council awarded a contract for the Riverton Park Improvements to Cunningham Davis Corp. in the amount of $312,000.00. The Contractor has completed constructing the park site improvements as specified in the construction contract. The work completed includes grading, construction of a decorative fence, sidewalk and an ornamental shade structure, installation of an automatic irrigation system, landscaping, and multicolored playground equipment. All the improvements were constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Services. The construction retention for this project will be released thirty five (35) days after the Notice of Completion has been filed. pw13%egdrpt%94%0111%pw93-O4.eoo 1227 The improvement plans and specifications require that the contractor maintain the park site improvements for 120 calendar days prior to acceptance by the Director of Community Services. At the end of the 120 days, the project will be accepted or the maintenance period will be extended until such time that the maintenance period specifications have been met. A warranty period commences on the day the Notice of Completion is recorded. Two (2%) percent of the contract award price is retained during this period. Should the contractor default on his maintenance responsibilities, the Warranty Retention will protect Community Services from any maintenance costs incurred prior to acceptance of the improvements. FISCAL IMPACT: The contract amount for this project was $312,000 plus a contingency amount of $31,200. Two contract change orders have been approved for an amount of $11,31 1.76, bringing the total contract amount to $323,311.76. The project was constructed within the combined contract and contingency amount of $343,200.00. Funds for this project were allocated from Development Impact Fees. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Notice of Completion 2. Maintenance Bond pw13%egdrpt~4%0111~w93-O4.ecc 1227 RECORDING REQUEb I rd,; BY AND RETURN TO: CrrYCLERK crrY OF TEMECULA 43174 imkmee Perk Drive Temeoula, CA 92690 IPACE ABOVE THli UNE FOIl RECORDER'I U~E NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. 3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to CUNNINGHAM DAVIS CORP. to perform the following work of improvement: PW93-04CSD RIVERTON PARK. 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifmations and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that Mid work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on January 11, 1994. That upon said contract the DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT PW93-04CSD. 6. The street address of said property is: 30950 RIVERTON LANE. Dated at Temecula, California, this _ day of · 1994. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA Ss JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is True and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. Dated at Temecula, California, this day of · 1994. JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk Foma/C]~-001 itev. 12-5J)1 pwl 3~lp%projecte%pw93-O4.esd%oompletn.not 011194 CITY OF. TEME~LA, PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT MAINTIdANCE BOND PROJE~ NO. PWSS-G405D BOND P. 2'3 NO: 144632P KNOW ALL MEN BY THinE PRESENI'~ THAT: ClRININGHAM-DAVIS CORP,11062 MULBERRY AVE,. FONTANA CA 92335 CORPORATION a, ' , hereinsfra,' Galled Princai:k~, and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY, 1425 W FOOTHILL BLVD STE 120, UPLAND CA 91786 hereirmft~ called SURE'I'Y, are held end firmly laund umo CITY OF T~':MECULA, hetlneflaroakdOWNEFl, inU~elar~lsum of ~-~TR.'~ O~S ~OUSAND ~T])~]) ~OL~S ~ HO CRNTS******************~OLL,MIS ~ O0/00'************* CBITI i$. 31,900..00,**********) in bwfui mon6y of ~he I. tn~8;[ STaTes, f~ U~e ;aymem of wha(~ sum weal and mjly to be msde, we bind ourselves. --".r-riemx's and assigns. joindy and 18VIfldy, firmly by ~'iese pritllhl3,. ' THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that wbefeNl, lhe Principal entered into a oarman ConicaCt with the OWNER, dated the 10TH dRIP Of AUGUST ., 1t 93. a oopV of wlti;h il harm ~ and m~iKie a par~ hereof for the constrUot~ Of PROJECT NO. PWg34344:JSD. WIIBTiAS, said Contract provides thut the Principal wgl furrdsh s bond condidoned to guNantee fe the WIoU of ~}De year sfte approval of the firel estimate on ui(f Job, by the OWNER, against all de~ects In workmenshiD and materials which may become al>lamnz dudnO aid period: end WHEREAS, the said Contract has been completed, and was approved on 12-9 19, 93. NOW, THEREFORIS, THE CONINTJON OF TH!8 OBLIGATION 18 SUCH, that if wtth[n one year from the dam of approval of the sold Contract, the work done tmcJer the tern of Hid Contract shag dispose poor w0rkmanehip i~ the exaction of sniff work, and the carrying out of the terms of seed Contract, or it shmU appear that defective matedais were furnished thereunder, than This obligation shall remain in full force and virtue, otherwise this instrument ehall be void, i)ECEHBER · · ¶9 93 . P.3.,,;3 8A~%EF~ DE1~LOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY R.E. GAIL ATTOR~EY- IN-FACT APPROVED al~ TO FORM: PR~aC~PAL CUNNINGHAM-DAVIS CORP ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SURETY (ATTORNEY-IN-FACT) STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SSe On 12-7-93 , before me SANDRA J. COOLEY, personally appeared R.E. GAIL personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand and off~~~~.e~l. ~/~ <j'~j,"Z* ,"~' '~'~..?=" ;l,\ ;,' "UP*.:: CALiFOrNIA ,~ ", ';.,, ~;:;: :' 2' '.:~ ."':- ~; ~.c;~.'o cou,,nv NO O f i f O rn i a / ","_. c::._i.::" :.:r ,.cram ~'3. rc3 f.'.at. ;9. 1995 )' POWER OF ATTORNEY OF INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA AND DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY NO 177654 P.O. BOX 19725, IRVINE, CA 92713 · (714) 263-3300 I~E: 1. A~~p~w~r~n~euth~r~tyhereingr~n~ed~ha~~~n~ny~ventterm~n~te~nthe31~td~yofM~rch~1~~6~ 2. This Power Of Attorney is void if litere(! or ff any doraon is erased. 3. This Power of Attorney is void unless the seal is readable, the text is in brown ink, the SigrmNres ere in blue ink end this notice is in red ink. 4. This Power of Attorney should not be refused to fie Attorney(s)-In-Flct, but Should remain a barmanera lad of the obligee's records. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that, except ILl expressly ~nited, INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALFORNIA and DEVILOIItRI INIURAIICE COMPANY, de each severefly, but not jointly, hereby rake, constitute and appoint ***Judith K. Austin, John C. Austin, R. E. Gail., jointly or severally*** the true and lawful Attorney(s)-In-Fsct, to rake, execute, clsiiver and acknowledge, for and on behalf of each of aid C~;~oralions sl Sureties, bond~ undertakings and corereels of Suretyship in In amount not exceeding Two MHlion Five Hundred Thousand Doilrs ($2,500,000) in any Single undMllking; giving and glinting Unto laid Attorney(iNn-Fact full power end luJthorlty to do and to perform every act nacelsery, requishe or prow to be done in connection therewith u ~ of elm corporations could do, IxJt reserving to eec~ Of Slid COrporations full Ixa~r of substitution and revocltion; and all of the Ictl Of Slid Attor~s)-In-FIct, purllant to thele pillstill, are hereby rltlfie(I and cofifirmed. The authority and powers COnferred by this Power of Attorney do not extend to any Of the following bondl, underlakinOI or contractl of Suretyship: Bank depository bonds, mortgage deficiency bonds, mow guarantee bends, guarantees Of instellment paper, note guarantee bonds, ben¢is on tinanal inxttfuttofis, lease bonds. insurance COmpany qualifying bonds, Nff-insurer'a bonds, tidalsly bonds or bail bonds. This Power Of Attorney is granted and is signed by facsimile under and by authority Of the following rceolutidns adopted by the respective Boards Of Directors of INDgMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA and DEVELOKelll INIURANCE COMPANY, effective iS Of Sepfofnlar 24, 1986: RESOLVED, that the Chairman of the Board, the President and any Vice Presides of the cprt,~oretion be, and that each of them hereby is. authorized to execute Powers of Attorney, qual~fying the ~tt~rney(s) named in the P~wers of Attorney to ex8cute~ ~n ~3ehalf of the m~ b~nd8~ undee1king~ and c~ntracts of Suretyship; ~nd that the Secretery of any i ant Sacdry of the COrborstion be, and each of them hereby is, 8uthorizad to liteat the execueon of any Such Power of Attorney; RESOLVED. FURTHER, that the signatures of such offider8 may be affixed to any Such Power of Attorney Or to any certfficate tainting thereto by facsimile, and any such Power of Attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signaloral shah be vsiid and binding upon the carporation when Io offixed and ifi the future wtth rN;act to any bond, undertoking of COntract of Suretyship to which it is ached. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA and DEVELOPERS INIURANCE COMPANY have leverlily caused these prslents to be igned by their rsq)ac- tlve President8 and attested by their relpectlve Secretaries this lit day of April, 1993. INDEMNfT'Y COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA DEVELOPL~I INBUBANCE COMPANY ~I F. Vista, Jr, ~ ~n ) F. Vim Jr. r P~idem · ~ A~EST A~T STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) On Aprtl 1, 1993, before me, Tirela Tlafua, personally appeared Dante F. VancentS, Jr, and Walter Crowell, bersonlHy known to me (os: provided to me on the bllil of v Ikfk I}ry evidence) to be the lamon(s) whose name(s) is/am lubscrlbed to the within instrument and ecknowtedged to me thm hellhe/they executed the Same in his/herltheh' muGHxlzld cepacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) On me instrument the person(s), or the entity udon bahaft Of which the penoNe) acted, executed the inmrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature JellellllllellellSllllllllS'lll~41':lJljl~lll~ CERTIfiCATE - The undersigned, as Senior Vice President of INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CAUFORNIA, end Senior Vice Prlident of DEVILOF!If8 INIUNANCE COMPANY, doel hltllby certify thm me foregoing and attached Power of Attorney remains in full force and hal not been revoked; end turthermore, thlt the provisions of the relotutfonl of the relpleifve Boards of Directors of Slid cofp(xltions let forth in the Power of Attorney, are in force as of the date Of this Certlftcme. This Certlticato is executed in the City of Irvina, California, this 7TT~ dly o/ ]:)17'C]gI~F"R - 199 3 INITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA ~ DEVILOPIRI INIIRIANCE COMPANLF?r~,~~~ By ~'~ By , * .5. Fiobiger Senior Vice President Senior VICe PrelMe~t ID-310 REV. 4/93 ITEM NO. 7 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Community Services Board of Directors David F. Dixon· General Manager January 11, 1993 Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement for a Project Coordinator During Construction of the Community Recreation Center Project No. PW92-O29B PREPARED BY: Shawn D Nelson Diirector of Communiity Services Don Spa;nolo Pr;nc pal Engineer Cap tel Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve Amendment No. 2, extending the Professional Services Agreement for a Project Coordinator during construction of the Community Recreation Center, Project No. PW92-29B in an amount not to exceed $10,240.00. DISCUSSION: On March 24, 1993 the City entered into an agreement with Steven J. Ford to provide Professional Services as a Project Coordinator for construction of the Community Recreation Center. An amendment to the agreement was approved for additional compensation for extending the constructing time by 23 days which was granted the contractor, T.B. Penick & Sons, Inc. for changes to the work being performed. The revised construction schedule requires that the services of the Project Coordinator be extended an estimated 32 days in order to provide complete services through to the end of the project. The scope of services as listed in exhibit "A" of the Agreement will remain unchanged. Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement will result in an increase to the contract in an amount not to exceed $10,240.00 pw13%agdrpt%94%0122%frdemend.no2 1229 FISCAL IMPACT: The original contract amount was for ~52,800.00. Amendment No. I to the Agreement increased the original contract amount $5,280.00. The adjusted contract amount is $58,080.00. Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement will increase the contract by an amount not to exceed $10,240.00 for a total contract amount of $68,320.00. Funds for Amendment No. 2 are available from TCSD bond proceeds in Account No. 250-190-129-5804. ATTACHMErITS: 1. Amendment No. 2 pwl 3~agdrpt%94%0122%frdemend.no2 1229 AM~-NDlVn=~NT NO. 2 STBVEN J. FORD CRC PROIF, CT COORDINATOR PURCHASE ORDER NO. 13849 The A~'eement dated March 24, 1993 between the City of Temecula, and Steven J. Ford (herein referred to as * AZreement*) is hereby mended as follows: Professional Servi~ for the Community Recreation Center RB: Project Coordination Services Community Recreation Center Section 1 I. The scope of services as listed in exhibit 'A' of the 'AZreement' will remain unchanZed. The need for an additional 32 working days for the project requires that the services of the Project Coordinator be extended during this period. Section 2 Compensation for services shall be total of all savi~ described in this Amendment and shall not exceed Ten Thousand Two Hundred and Forty Dollars ($10,240.00). All above costs are eliZible for fundinE thwugh Temecula Community Services District bond proceeds. The total cost of this element of the project is summarized below: Original Contract Amount Adjusted Contract Amount Proposed Amendment No. 2 Total Contract Amount $ 52,800.00 $ 58,080.00 $ 10,240.00 $ 68.320.00 pw131agdrpfi94~O122%frdenend.no2 1229 Section 3 All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same. The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above written. By' -~ By: &,/,Steven/~. Ford CITY OF TEIVIECULA APPROVED AS TO FORM: Scott F. Field, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk ITEM NO. 8 APPROVAl CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Community Services Board of Directors FROM: David F. Dixon, General Manager DATE: January 11, 1994 SUBJECT: Contract Change Orders No. 10 through No. 11 Community Recreation Center - Phase II Project No. PW92-29B PREPARED BY: (~3(-Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer- Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve Contract Change Orders No. 10 and No. 11 for the Community Recreation Center - Phase II, Project No. PW92-29B, for labor, material, and equipment in the amount of $34,519.14. BACKGROUND: During the construction of the Community Recreation Center the following items of work have resulted in a change to the contract: CHANGE ORDER NO. 10 Demo Curb. Ramo. and Asohalt: Modify curb and gutter, access ramps, and sidewalk to meet American Disabilities Act (ADA) Handicapped Requirements. The locations are at the NE corner of the gym and perking lot, the upper walkway from the perking lot to the gym, and the westerly corner of the electric room and gym for entry into the swimming pool area. The modification requires demolition of two areas and the addition of concrete walkways, steps and access ramps. Footing for Light Standard: Relocate one light so that a walkway can be added at the NE corner of the gym to provide access to the parking lot. The construction change is required to meet ADA requirements. Additional Area Drains: Add three landscape drains to remove water away from building areas. The locations are at the NE corner of the gym, the landscape wall fronting the gym, and the sidewalk paving at the gallery entry. pwl 3%egdrpt%94%0111%pw92-29b 123093 4. Asphalt Patch: Patch asphalt where curb and sidewalk was removed and/or reconstructed to meet ADA requirements. SUBTOTAL: $13,246.55 An estimated $5,000.00 will be deducted from the architect's last progress payment to reimburse the City for the design modifications needed to meet ADA Handicap Requirements. CHANGE ORDER NO, 11 10. Area Drains: To eliminate ponding, install an additional area drains at the chemical storage facility, the planter adjacent to the access ramp at the NW corner of the electrical room, and at the concrete sidewalk adjacent to the pool equipment room. Proiection Screen: Install conduit and wiring as needed to supply power to the projection screen located in the stage area· Monument Sign: Modify the monument sign located at the main entrance to incorporate the change in name from "Rancho California Sports Park" to "Temecula Community Recreation Center·" Bracket SUPPOrtS: Install brackets to provide structural support for the counters at the swimming pool and ampithaater pass through windows and the decorative lights at the main entrance. Backwash Tank: Install conduit, wiring, and service connections as needed to supply power to the pump attached to the backwash tank. Tile in Kitchen: Sat tile within the mop basin and extend the tile to a height of 8' in the kitchen to meet Health Department requirements. Roll Up Door: Install additional slats to properly seal the roll up door for the ampitheater. HVAC System: Modify the HVAC system within the Director's office, because of construction constraints caused by the fire protection system and the height of the ceiling. Test Box: Install a test box in the plaza concrete outside of the kitchen to satisfy Eastern Municipal Water District requirements. Additional Conduit: Install additional conduit under the driveway approach and from the audio-visual room at the ampitheater to the computer room by the gymnasium to allow for future cable and electrical service. SUBTOTAL: $21,272.59 TOTAL: $34.519.14 pw13~gdrpt~94~0111%pw92-29b 123093 FISCAL IMPACT: The original contract was awarded in the amount of $4,196,400.00. Contract Change Orders No.1 through No. 9 were approved for a total amount of $101,745.86. Contract Change Orders No. 10 and 11 will increase the adjusted contract by an amount not to exceed 834,519.14. This increase will exceed the 88,254. 14 remaining in the approved contingency amount of $110,000.00 by $26,265.00. The total adjusted contract amount for the project is $4,332,665.00. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Contract Change Order No. 10 2. Contract Change Order No. 11 pw13~mgdq~t~94%0111%pw92-29b 123093 / City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590 (9091 694-1989 · FAX (909) 694-' CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 10 CONTRACT NO. PW92-29B PROJECT: Community Recreation Center - Phase II SHEET 1 of _Z_ TO CONTRACTOR: T, P, Penick & Sons, Inc, NOTE: This change order is not effective until aDoroved by the Engineer. THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR: An INCREASE in the following items: Demo Curb. Ramo. and Asohalt: Modify curb and gutter, access ramps, and sidewalk to meet American Disabilities Act (ADA) Handicapped Requirements. The locations are at the NE corner of the gym and parking lot, the upper walkway from the parking lot to the gym, and the westerly corner of the electric room and gym for entry into the swimming pool area. The modification requires demolition of two areas and the addition of concrete walkways, steps and access ramps. Footina for Light Standard: Relocate one light so that a walkway can be added at the NE corner of the gym to provide access to the parking lot. The construction change is required to meet ADA requirements. Additional Area Drains: Add three landscape drains to remove water away from building areas. The locations are at the NE corner of the gym, the landscape wall fronting the gym, and the sidewalk paving at the gallery entry. e Asphalt Patch: Patch asphalt where curb and sidewalk was removed and/or reconstructed to meet ADA requirements. TOTAL:S13,246.55 Original Contract Amount ................................. S4,196,400.00 Adjusted Contract Amount ................................. e4,298,145.86 Change Order No. 09 .--. ................................... $ 13,246.55 Total Contract Amount .................................... e4,311,392.~. 1 Adjustment of Working Days ................................. Approved: Principal enar. By: CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 10 CONTRACT NO. PW92-29B SHEET 2 of 2 We the undersigned contractor have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree. If this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work. Date Acoe.ted: /' 3' By: ~~s~ ure~~'L' t Name: 7/~_Y'7/~ (print) Contractor: ~ ~ ~,~ (company's name) Title: ~ ~/~ If the contractor does not sign acceptance of this order, his attention is directed to the requirements of the specifications as to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written protest within the time therein specified. City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590 (909) 694-1989 · FAX (909) 694-1 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 11 CONTRACT NO. PW92-29B PROJECT: Communltv Recreation Center - Phase II SHEET _!.. of 2 TO CONTRACTOR: T. P. Penick & Sons, Inc. NOTE: This chanOe order is not effective until aDoroved by the Engineer. THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR: An INCREASE in the following items: Area Drains: To eliminate ponding, install an additional area drains at the chemical storage facility, the planter adjacent to the access ramp at the NW corner of the electrical room, and at the concrete sidewalk adjacent to the pool equipment room. Projection Screen: Install conduit and wiring as needed to supply power to the projection screen located in the stage area. Monument Sion: Modify the monument sign located at the main entrance to incorporate the change in name from "Rancho California Sports Park" to "Temecula Community Recreation Center." Bracket SuPPOrtS; Install brackets to provide structural support for the counters at the swimming pool and ampitheater pass through windows and the decorative lights at the main entrance, Backwash Tank: Install conduit, wiring, and service connections as needed to supply power to the pump attached to the backwash tank. Tile in Kitchen: Set tile within the mop basin and extend the tile to a height of 8' in the kitchen to meet Health Department requirements. Roll Uo Door: Install additional slats to properly seal the roll up door which was incorrectly sized in the specifications. HVAC System: Modify the HVAC system within the Director's office, because of construction constraints caused by the fire protection system and the height of the ceiling. Test Box: Install a test box in the plaza concrete outside of the kitchen to satisfy Eastern Municipal Water District requirements. pwD~p~z~cts~nv92-2gV;c~c~o. ll 12.:0)3 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 11 CONTRACT NO. PW92-29B SHEET 2 of 2 10. Additional Conduit: Install additional conduit under the driveway approach and from the audio-visual room at the ampitheater to the computer room by the gymnasium to allow for future cable and electrical service. TOTAL: $21,272.59 Original Contract Amount ................................. 14, 196,400.00 Adjusted Contract Amount ................................. 14,311,392.41 Change Order No. 09 ..................................... $ 21,272.59 Total Contract Amount .................................... 14,332,665.00 Adjustment of Working Days ................................. Approved: Principal Engr. By: ~~j"'/" Date: We the undersigned contractor have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree. If this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work. Date Accepted: /" /~~(signature) Name: //~///i~7 //~'~'-/'/ (print) (company's name) Title: ~/ /~1~0~C'~ If the contractor does not sign acceptance of this order, his attention is directed to the requirements of the specifications as to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written protest within the time therein specified. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 1993 A special meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order on Tuesday, November 30, 1993, 6:40 P.M., at the Murrieta City Hall Council Chambers, 26442 Beckman Court, Murrieta. Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding. PRESENT: 4 ABSENT: I AGENCY MEMBERS: AGENCY MEMBERS: Muf~oz, Roberts, Stone, Parks Birdsall Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, AssiBm City Manager Woody Edvalson, and City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMM;NT None AGENCY BUSINFSS Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of November 9, 1993; 1.2 Approve the minutes of November 23, 1993. It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Roberrs to approve the staff recommendation. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Muf~oz, Roberts, Stone, Parks NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: I AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall FXFCUTIVE DIR;CTOR'S REPORT None RDAMIN11130/93 -1 - 1 W10/93 RFDEVFLOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES NOV;MB;R 30, 1993 AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS Agency Member Muf~oz asked for a status update on the negotiations concerning the judgement in Dawes vs the City of Temecula. City Manager David Dixon advised the agency that the attorney for both parties have met end reached agreement and a request for concurrent from the County should be presented to the County in early January. ADJOURNMFNT It was moved by Agency Member Robarts, seconded by Agency Member Stone to adjourn at 6:50 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried with Agency Member Birdsall absent. The next regular meeting of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency will be held on Tuesday, December 14, 1993, 8:00 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. ATTEST: Chairperson Ronald J. Parks June S. Greek, City Clerk RDAMIN 11130/93 -2- 1 )./10/93 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING HELD DECEMBER 14, 1993 A regular meeting of the Temecuie Community Services District was called to order at 8:50 PM, 22816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding. PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsell, Mu~oz, Roberrs, Stone, Parks ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None Also present were General Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field and Agency Secretary June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENT None given. AGENCY BUSINESS I Election of Chairperson It was moved by Agency Member Birdsall, seconded by Agency Member Stone to nominate Ronald J. Parks to serve as Chairperson of the Redevelopment Agency until the end of calendar year 1994. The motion was unanimously carried. 2 Election of Vice Chairoerson It was moved by Agency Member Robarts, seconded by Agency Member Stone to nominate Agency Member Mufioz as Vice Chairperson who will assume the duties of the Chairperson in his absence until the end of calendar year 1994. The motion was unanimously carried. 3 Combining Balance Sheet as of Scotember 30. 1993 and Statement of Revenues. Expenditures and Chan0es in Fund Balance for the Three Months Fnded Seotember 30. 1993 It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Birdsell to approve staff recommendation as follows: RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Receive end file the Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1993 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1993. The motion was unanimously carried. 4~])kli~12149~ -1- 01/0~94 Temecula Redevelopmerit Aeen~y M'nrates . December 14. 1993 RECESS Chairperson Parks called a recess at 8:52 PM. Chairperson Parks reopened the RDA Meeting at 12:10 AM. City Attorney Field announced that the public hearings by the City Council and Redevelopment Agency would be heard currently. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4 Disoosition and nevelooment Agreement. Prooertv Exchanae and I ease Aoreement by and between the Redevelooment Anencv of the City of Temecula and the Donna L. Reeves Trust UTD 7-~5-90 for the Properties Located at ~7500 Jefferson Road and 26744 Ynez Road City Attorney Field presented the joint staff reports. He announced that in addition to the staff report, discussions were entertained to enter into an option agreement which would allow Reeves to repurchase the Jefferson Road property at 82 million dollars for up to 60 days prior to expiration of 12 months. He explained that during a 10 month period, the City would have the ability to market the site, with Reeves having the right of first refusal. Chairperson Parks opened the public hearing at 12:17 AM. Mr. Aaron Jacoby, 355 S. Grand Avenue, 31st Floor, Los Angeles, representing the Reeves Group, stated the additional agreement allows the Reeves Group to help the City find a buyer. He stated this action will allow for expansion of sales capability to approximately 250-300 cars per month. Dave Kennedy, applicant, stated the business function will be moved to the Ynez Site, and the Company goal is to get the full operation moved as soon as possible. Chairperson Parks closed the public hearing at 12:25 AM. It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Robarts to approve staff recommendation as follows: 4.1 Approve the Resolution approving the Disposition and Development Agreement, the § 031 Exchange Agreement, the Lease Agreement between the Agency and Reeves regarding the properties located at 27500 Jefferson Road and 26755 Ynez Road, subject to approval by the General Counsel as to the final form of the Agreements. The motion was unanimously carried. 4LIIgA)iI~I21493 -2- 01/N/94 Temecula Redeveklpment AgenCy Minutes l'~s~-mbe~ 14. 1993 5 Use of RedeveloDment Bond Proceeds for Construction of City Administrative Offices and Corporate Yard City Attorney Field presented the joint staff report. Chairperson Parks opened the public hearing at 12:35 AM. Pat Keller, P.O. Box 521, Temecula, addressed the Council and Agency in Opposition to the use of Redevelopment Funds for construction of a City Administrative Center. Steve Taploy, 43939 Margarita Road, spoke in opposition to the use of RDA funds for construction of a City Hall. He also stated he distributed a letter concerning the lease payments the City pays for its current facility and would like the figures reported in the press corrected for the record. Howard Omdahl, 45850 Via Vaquero Road, addressed the Council and Agency stating the Bank of America location is not the proper location for City Hall, and suggested the Crystal Ridge location, which he represents, would be a much better location for this facility. City Manager Dixon explained that. what is before the Council and Agency is not acquisition or acceptance of a site, but merely financing in the event that this site is chosen for construction of a facility. Chairman Parks closed the public hearing at 12:50 AM. It was moved by Agency Member Parks, seconded by Agency Member Stone to approve staff recommendation with an amendment to the resolution title and Section 2 changing the appropriation to $4,000,000.00. 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 93-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROPRIATING $4 MILLION DOLLARS FROM THE SERIES 1993 TAX ALLOCATION BONDS TO BE USED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES AND A CORPORATION YARD NORTH OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND WEST OF DIAZ ROAD The motion was unanimously carried. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT None given. 4XRDA]iffiI21493 Temecula Redevelilgment A~ency Minutes December 14. 1993 AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS None given. ADJOURNMENT Chairperson Parks adjourned the Redevelopment Meeting at 12:55 AM to s meeting on January 11, 1994, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary 4~DAliN~I21493 4- 01/0al/94