The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About061593 CC AgendaAGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER - 28816 Pujol Street June 15, 1993 - 7:00 PM At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM CALL TO ORDER: Mayor J. Sal Mu~oz presiding Flag Salute Councilmember Stone ROLL CALL: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Mu~oz PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed on the Agenda or on the consent Calendar, a pink "Request To Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items a "Request To Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk befor~ the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual. speakers. COUNCIL BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. ,""" 2/agendN061893 1 06/08/13 City of Temecula General Plan, Implementation Program, Environmental Impact Report and Mitigation Monitoring Program - ~ RECOMMENDATION 1.1 Review the parcel-specific land use requests, take public testimony, and direct staff to incorporate the element as presented into the final General Plan which will be presented for City Council adoption at the conclusion of the Public Hearings. CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT CITY COUNCIL REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: June 22, 1993, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California /" 21Nlenda/061893 2 08/08/83 ITEM 1 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning June 15, 1993 City of Temecula General Plan, Implementation Program, Environmental Impact Report and Mitigation Monitoring Program. PREPARED BY: JohnMeyer RECOMMENDATION: BACKGROUND It is requested that the City Council review the Parcel Specific Land Use Requests, take public testimony, and direct staff to incorporate the element as presented into the final General Plan which will be presented for City Council adoption at the conclusion of the Public Hearings. Over the past several months, the City Council has held five public hearings on the Draft City General Plan. To date the Circulation, Economic Development , Public Safety, Noise, Air Quality, Community Design, Open Space/Conservation, Growth Management/Public Facilities and Land Use Elements have been reviewed by the Council. At the June 15, 1993, meeting, the Council will continue to review the Parcel Specific Land Use Requests. DRAFT LAND USE PLAN Staff has received numerous requests from property owners to amend the land use designation on their property. Staff has divided the requests into 6 area groups. The following table indicates in which group the individual requests are located. To date, the Council has reviewed the HWY 79 S. and Chaparral area groups, which comprises about half of the parcel specific land use requests. Hwy. 79 South II Chaparral III Urban Core · ~ i.. : MAP NUMBERS .. · ~ 1, 2.1, 2.2, 3, 7, 9, 10, 21, 22, 28, 29, 32, 36, 37, 40, 45, 52 and 54 4, 11, 14, 17, 18, 19, 24, 25, 26, 38 end 60 5, 6, 13, 20, 30, 31, 33, 42.2, 42.3, 42.4, 42.5, 42.6, 42.7, 42.8, 42.9, 47, 48, 49, 50, 58 and 62 S\GENPLAN\GP.CC6 1 IV V VI Westside Foothills Nicolas Valley Meadowview/Winchester M,4P NUMBERS ~ 15, 39, 42.1,43, 44, 46 and 51 8, 16, 23, 27, 35, 55, 56, 57, 59, and 61 12, 41, 53.1 and 53.2 With respect to the Chaparral area, staff has met with Larry Markham to discuss his proposal for the Chaparral Special Study Area. Mr. Markham has compiled various information including topography, lot layout and distribution, and development patterns in the Chaparral area. At the May 18, City Council meeting, he requested that the area be redesignated from Very Low Residential to Low Residential. City staff and the Planning Center have reviewed the policies Mr. Markham distributed at the last Council Meeting. The intent behind his request is to move forward with the redesignation of the area and determine the carrying capacity or reasonable development opportunity at a project level subject to the proposed policies and standards. Staff and Representatives from The Planning Center are generally in agreement with the direction Mr. Markham has taken with his analysis and proposed policies. However, to be consistent with the General Plan Implementation Measures for the Special Study Area (Land Use Element page 2-42), staff feels additional analysis needs to occur and should occur on an area-wide rather than project level basis. Therefore staff supports no change to the area's land designation at this time. Although the Council took a straw vote on properties located in Group I, staff seeks some clarification regarding request No. 10 {Penfold). The City Council directed staff to combine the request in a Specific Plan Overlay with request No. 32 (Johnson + Johnson). However, Staff is not clear as to whether the underlying Very Low Land Use designation was to remain or be changed to Professional Office, like the Johnson Property. Staff has been contacted by a dentist who is interested in establishing a practice in one of the existing residences. Under current zoning (Ord. 348), one could move forward with a Conditional Use Permit for a medical office use, ahead of preparing a Specific Plan. However this would open the door for certain uses to be established without a CUP. Theses uses include feed and grain sales, nurseries and garden supplies, pet shops, real estate offices, and arts, crafts and curio shops (Ord 348 section 5.1 ). Subsequent to the May 18, 1993 meeting, staff has received one letter. Staff has attached the letter from Saba A. Saba, who owns property at the North West Corner of Thompson Road and Leon Road (northwest of Winchester Road). No action is necessary since the site is located within Murrieta's sphere of influence. Mr. Saba was directed to the Murrieta Planning Department: The Council is advised, that Staff has not included any of the land use plan material previ'ously distributed in the May 18, 1993 City Council Agenda Packet. If new copies of the matrix or maps are needed please contact Staff. S~GENPLAN~GP. CC6 2 CONCLUSION The General Plan Consultants and Planning Department believe the Community Design, Open Space/Conservation, Growth Management/Public Facilities Elements have been adequately revised to respond to comments received by individuals, groups, and other agencies. Attachments: 1. New Letter of Request - Page 4 S~GENPLAN%GP,CC6 3 ATTACHMENT NO, 1 NEW LETTER OF REQUEST S\GENPLAN~GP.CC6 4 Saba A. Saba 41309 Avenida Biona Temecula, CA. 92591 May 26, 1993 RECEIVED Honorable Mayor & Council Members Temecula City Council 28816 Pujol Street Temecula, CA. 92590 J U N 0 1 1993 A.s 'd Re: Parcel Specific Land Use Requests Dear Honorable Mayor & Council Members, I was shocked and dismayed to see that the property I own-Parcel numbers 467-230-021, 467-230-029, and 467-230-030, are being designated by the Temecula Planning Commission for Residential use. These Parcels were designated by the Board of Supervisors as commercial according to SWAP in September 1989. RanPac Engineering processed a map for change of Zone No. 5367 and Plot Plan 10971 at the County of Riverside. The above project is still active and additional fees have been paid to the County to keep it active. I have spent in excess of $75,000 on this project, designated as ADOBE SPRINGS PLAZA. The Temecula Planning Commission is proposing to change it from commercial to residential-both illogical and incompatible with what the Planning Comm~ssion's proposal of the property directly to the North as Business Park and directly to the South as commercial. The Parcels involved will be bisected by a six-lane street at right angle with Winchester Road. This continues and connects with Briggs Street-a proposed four-lane road. The above 3 Parcels are in the Dutch Village Assessment District, paying additional assessments of $4500/acre. The above Parcels are the cornerstone for EMWD water and sewer and reclaimed water line as well as Southern California Gas, and Southern California Edison. In addition I participated monetarily in the Transportation study approved by the County. Because of the above factors if a logical choice to be made based on suitability for commercial usage, it is the only logical choice, and certainly better than the c. nes surrounding it. Here is a property bordered by a Buriness Park to the North, a Commercial Center to the South and Highway 79 to the East. Who in his right mind would want to live in that kind of environment? Traffic, Noise, and Pollution. No developer in hi~right mind would gamble to buy such a project, and build houses on it, especially in these difficult times. The County Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors were correcU. They designated the Parcels commercial, because it makes sense, it is compatible, and it is the best use and it bene£its the community. I urge you to con£irm the County's designation as commercial. c.c. John R. Meyer,AICP Senior Planner Iill~ · .----h '\ ' v - :, ',° .t :tea French Valley Sup. ~st. Circglalion ~nohester Road Arlerial 110' Element Thompsow Ro~d Secondary 88' Murrlet~ . . , ' ' . 5. 15 prl~iRo~ NO ~CALE