The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About062293 CC AgendaAGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER - 28816 Pujol Street JUNE 22, 1993 - 7:00 PM At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items' can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM CALL TO ORDER: Invocation Flag Salute ROLL CALL: PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 93-13 Resolution: No. 93-47 Mayor J. Sal Mu~oz presiding Pastor Charles Graham, New Covenant FellOwship Councilmember Parks Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Mur~oz Anti-Graffiti Poster Contest Awards Amateur Radio Week PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item no~; listed on the Agenda or on the consent Calendar, a pink "Request To Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items a "Request To Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. AgendNO62293 1 0611e/~3 NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. CONSENT CALENDAR 2 Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading Of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of May 18, 1993. 3 Resolution Aoorovinq List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 Revised Solid Waste Rates for FY 1993-94 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the revised solid waste rates for commercial, industrial, and multi-family refuse and recycling services in the City of Temecula. Agenda/082293 2 Oe/18/~3 PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 6 PA93-0038 - Rec~uest to Convert Existinq Young Adult Nightclub Into An Adult Only NicJhtclub Which Will Allow On-site Consumption of Alcohol (Continued from the meeting of 6/8/93) RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PA93-0038, MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONVERT AN EXISTING TEEN NIGHTCLUB INTO AN ADULT ONLY NIGHTCLUB AND ALLOW THE SELLING AND ON-SITE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL LOCATED AT 28822 FRONT STREET, SUITE 203, PARCEL NUMBER 922-093-002 RDA Assistance - WaI-Mart RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Continue the public hearing to the meeting of July 13, 1993. Caoital IrnDrovement Proaram Fiscal Years 1994-98 RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF .THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEARS 1994-98 Agef~e/082283 3 08118/83 COUNCIL BUSINESS 8 ProPosed Fiscal Years 1993-94 Annual ODeratina Budaet RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Review the proposed annual Operating Budget for the Fiscal Year 1993- 94, make adjustments if desired; 8.2 8.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING THE OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE VARIOUS DEPARTMENT BUDGETS Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS 9 10 Bovs and Girls Club Fundinq (Continued from the meeting of June 8, 1993) RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Authorize the City Manager to execute a loan agreement of $374,846 with the Boys and Girls Club for construction of the Boys and Girls Club Facility. Friendship Baseball Tournament Reauest RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Deny request of a $1,400 grant for a youth traveling baseball team from Temecula to participate in the Friendship Baseball Tournament in Danvers, Massachusetts. Agerids/062283 4 08116,'~3 11 Reauest for ODeratina Assistance - Temecula Museum RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Consider a request from the Temecula Valley Museum to provide them with support, on an interim basis, until a resolution can be found and agreed upon for a permanent museum facility. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT CITY COUNCIL REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: July 13, 1993, 7:00 PM, Temecula CommUnity Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California Agenda/O82283 IS Oell 7/93 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING - (To be held at 8:00) Next in Order: CALL TO ORDER: President Patricia H. Birdsall Ordinance: No. 93-01 Resolution: No. 93-04 ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Mu~oz, Parks, RobertS, Stone, Birdsall PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR I Acceotance of Grant Deed for John Maaee Park - the Preslev Comoanies RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Accept a grant deed from The Presley Companies for John Magee Park, a one acre neighborhood park within Tract No. 23267-4. DISTRICT BUSINESS 2 Adoption of 1993-94 Annual ODeratina BudcJet RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING THE ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 FOR THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS AND PERSONNEL POSITIONS Agendd082283 6 06/17/83 PUBLIC HEARING 3 TCSD Rates and Charqes for FY 1993-94: and Establish a New Benefit Zone Entitled Service Level R RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF' THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES, PARKS AND RECREATION, STREET LIGHTING, GRAFFITI REMOVAL, SLOPE MAINTENANCE, AND RECYCLING AND REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993-1994 3.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ESTABLISHING A BENEFIT ZONE ENTITLED SERVICE LEVEL R WITHIN ITS BOUNDARIES DEPARTMENTAL REPORT GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT - Dixon DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting July 13, 1993, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California Agende/Oe2283 7 08116/93 ::? TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING Next in Order: Resolution: No. 93-03 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Roberrs, Stone, Mu~oz, Parks PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. AGENCY BUSINESS Adoption of 1993-94 Annual Operating Budqet RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ADOPTING THE OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 FOR THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS 2 APProval of Offer -·Rancho West Apartments RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING A FORMAL OFFER ON THE RANCHO WEST APARTMENTS BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO THE RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION AgendNO62293 8 06116/93 2.2 2.3 Authorize the Executive Director to submit an offer; Authorize the Executive Director and City Clerk to execute all necessary documents. 3 Development and DispOSition AQreement - WalMart DeDartment Store RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Continue to the meeting of July 13, 1993. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'$ REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'$ REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting July 13, 1993, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816, Temecula, California Ageride/062293 06118/113 PRESENTATIONS\ PROCLAMATIONS The City of Temecula PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, a subslantial number of licensed Amateur Radio openmrs who have demonstrated their value in public assistance by providing emergency radio communications live in the City of Temeeula, and; , · WHEREAS, these Amateur Radio operators donate their time and services free of charge to the City, in the interest of the citizens of the City as well as the world, and; WHEREAS, Amateur Radio operamE are on alert for any emergency, local, national or world-wide, and they practice their communication skills during the American Radio Relay League, Inc., Field Day exercise, and; WHEREAS, this year's Amateur Radio Field Day will take place on June 26-27, 1993, NOW, THEREFORE, I, J. Sat Mu~oz, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim the week of June 21-27 as to be in the City of Temeeula, in recognition of this important emergency preparedness exercise, and call upon all citizens to pay appropriate tribute to the Amateur Radio operators of our City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 22rid day of June, 1993. J. Sat Mu~oz, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk ITEM 1 ITEM NO. 2 MINUTES OF A ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MAY 18, 1993 An adjourned meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order on Tuesday, May 18, 1993, 7:00 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. The meeting was called to order by Mayor J. Sal Mu~oz. Councilmember Birdsall led the flag salute· PRESENT: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Mu~oz ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were Assistant City Manager Woody Edvalson, City Attorney F. Scott Field, City Clerk June S. Greek and Recording Secretary Gail Zigler. PUBLIC COMMENTS None COUNCIL BUSINESS Award of Contract for Special Counsel Assistant City Manager Woody Edvalson presented the staff report. Mayor Mu~oz stated that he feels it is important that a member of the Council participate in the interview process. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to approve staff recommendation as follows: 1.1 Award a professional services contract, to address employee relations, to the law firm of Rexon, Freedman, Klepetar and Hambleton. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS:' COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Mu~oz None None CCMINOS/18/93 -1- 5/28/93 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES PUBLIC HEARINGS MAY 18, 1993 City of Temecula General Plan, Implementation Proaram, Environmental Impact Reoort and Mitigation Monitorinq Proaram Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report. Mayor Mu~oz opened the public hearing at 7:25 P.M. Nayree Davis, 28895 Vallejo, Temecula, representing the Los Ranchitos Property Owners Association, addressed the Council speaking in opposition to the request for land use designation on Maps No. 1, 3, 7, 21, 22, 28, 29, 40 and 54. Ms. Davis stated that Planning staff has recommended no change to all parcels, but parcel 22. Ms. Davis stated that egress from Highway 79 South has not been granted by Cal Trans for Maps No. 1, 3, 7, 28, 29, 40 and 54, therefore, egress for these Maps would come from residential streets. Ms. Davis advised the Council that the Property Owners Association performed an informal survey in March and a majority of the property owners are against any commercial designation within the Los Ranchitos development. Ms. Davis asked that the Council ensure that maximum buffering be provided for existing homeowners from surrounding commercial zones. John Moramarco, P.O. Box 906, Temecula, requested the Council's support for a change in land use designation on Map 3. Mr. Moramarco stated that the close proximity of the parcel to Highway 79 South will discourage homebuilders due to the noise levels generated from the highway. Mr. Moramarco advised that the parcel is currently surrounded by churches and commercial zoning. Dudley Schumacher, 29110 Vallejo Avenue, Temecula, stated that twice in the past two years he has done a door-to-door survey of the Los Ranchitos homeowners regarding the request by Mr. Moramarco, and only two people have been in favor of Mr. Moramarco's request. Vern Iverson, 30903 Del Rey Avenue, Temecula, advised the Council that he has owned property in Los Ranchitos for twelve years and he was aware at the time he purchased his property that Highway 79 South was planned as a six lane highway. Elliott Urhich, 37161 Van Gaale, Murrieta, representing the property owners of Parcel 10, which is currently adjacent to the main entrance to the 24-hour AM/PM gas station/mini mart, requested an office commercial designation with increased buffering to the surrounding property owners. Councilmember Birdsall questioned if there is a land use designation that would be beneficial to both the City and the property'owner without having a detrimental effect on existing residences. CCMIN05/18/93 -2- 5128/93 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 18, 1993 Planning Director Gary Thornhill advised that there are no residences to the north of the property and the property is .connected to the .specific plan area to the west. Director Thornhill suggested that the specific plan design could be applied to this parcel. Director Thornhill stated that churches, day care facilities, etc., would be an appropriate transitional use. Mayor Mu~oz asked the applicant's representative if they would be willing to be placed under a specific plan design. Mr. Urhich stated that the property owners have expressed their willingness to do so. Jon Lieberg, 27349 Jefferson Avenue, #213, Temecula, representing the property owner for Map 63, advised the Council that a professional office designation is a downgrade from the current commercial zoning and would have a negative financial impact on the property owner. Mr. Lieberg told the Council that the property is currently in escrow. Councilmember Stone stated that he feels a service commercial designation is necessary in this area to lessen the congestion on the Pala Road bridge and to benefit the residents in this area. Mayor Mu~oz declared a recess at 8:30 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 8:45 P.M. Mayor Mu~oz made a recommendation, and it was the overall consensus of the Council to continue consideration of Groups 3, 4, 5 and 6 to the meeting of June 15, 1993. Phillip Jones, 33100 Pauba Road, Temecula, representing Map 37, parcels 1, 2 and 3, advised the Council that the property owners have dropped their waterpark project and request a medium density residential/neighborhood commercial designation. Csaba Ko, 27555 Ynez Road, Temecula, representing Kemper Real Estate, requested the Council support the applicant's request for a neighborhood commercial designation on both parcels of Map 9, opposing staff recommendation for neighborhood commercial on the east side of the parcel and office commercial on the west side of the parcel. Mr. Ko stated that the applicant would like the entire parcel designated neighborhood commercial. Terri Gassen, 44501 Verde Drive, Temecula, representing the Los Ranchitos Board of Directors, asked for the Council's support in opposing commercial designation within the Los Ranchitos Property Owners Association and asked that the Council require significant buffering of residences from commercial zones along the boundaries of Los Ranchitos. Mike Santoro, 30275 Jedediah Smith Road, Temecula, expressed opposition to the request for commercial zone designation in the Los Ranchitos Property Owners Association. CCMINOS/t 8~93 -3- 5128193 - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 18, 1993 Carole Corazza, 44220 La Paz Street, Temecula, expressed opposition to any driveway access off of La Paz. Jim Hall, 28920 Vallejo Avenue, Temecula, expressed his concern that there is not enough room for a driveway location off of La Paz on Mr. Moramarco's property. Councilmember Birdsall indicated she has a conflict of interest on the following Maps: 3, 7, 9, 28, 29, 40, 54, and 63. The overall consensus of the Council is as follows: GROUPI Approved by unanimous consensus Maps No. 10, 1, and 32 with the understanding that Map No. 10 will be considered as a part of the Specific Plan to the West with a suggested designation of Mixed Use W/SP. Approved staff recommendation on Map No. 2 by unanimous consensus. Mayor Mu~oz and Councilmember Stone indicated a preference for an Office/Commercial designation for Maps No. 3 and 7 with instructions that landscape buffering be provided along Vallejo Street and that no access be allowed from Vallejo or LaPaz. Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs and Councilmember Parks indicated a preference to see a specific plan for the properties before imposing access conditions for La Paz. (Councilmember Birdsall abstained) Approved staff recommendation on Map No. 9 by unanimous consensus. (Councilmember Birdsall abstained). Approved applicants request to support a neighborhood/commercial designation for Map No. 63 by unanimous consensus. Approved staff recommendation on Maps No. 28, 29, and 40 by unanimous consensus (Councilmember Birdsall abstained). Approved staff recommendation on Map No. 21 by unanimous consensus. Approved Planning Commission recommendation on Maps No. 22, 36 and 45, by unanimous consensus. Approved Requested Land Use for Neighborhood Commercial/Medium on Map No. 37 by unanimous consensus. Approved staff recommendation on Map No. 52 by unanimous consensus. CCMIN05/18/93 -4- 5128/93 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 18, 1993 Approved staff recommendation on Map No. 54 by unanimous consensus with Councilmember Birdsall abstaining. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs, seconded by Councilmember Stone to extend the meeting to 10:30 P.M. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberrs, Stone, Mu~oz NOES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Councilmember Stone stepped down due to a potential conflict of interest. Larry Markham, 41750 Winchester Road, Suite N, Temecula, representing Map 14 (Sussman) and Map 24 (Paine), advised Council that he performed special studies of the Chapparal area (slope analysis and overlays) and he is providing a series of area specific policies that would address grading, drainage, access, environmental concerns, open space and buffering. Mr. Markham stated that he provided the City Clerk with a petition of signatures from everyone in the special study area that are in favor of the change from very low density to low density. Planning Director Gary Thornhill advised that staff has not had the opportunity to review the policies and recommended that the Council defer any decisions to the meeting of June 15, 1993 to allow time for staff review. Director Thornhill stated that staff would generally be in support of the recommendation by Mr. Markham. Elliott Urhich, 37161 Van Gaale, Murrieta, representing the property owners for Parcel 4, requested a change from very low to a neighborhood commercial designation since the two adjoining parcels are so designated. Randy Jackson, of the Planning Center, stated that staff has a concern with creating small strip commercial areas which will take away from the village center concept. Mr. Jackson stated that there are two village centers proposed in this vicinity which are the appropriate distance apart and will adequately service the two areas. Mr. Urhich asked that Parcel 4 be included in the special study area. Steve Doulames, Pro-Civil Engineering, 27315 Jefferson Avenue, Suite J-12, Temecula, California, representing Map 17 (Pearson), request the Council's support in a change of designation from very low to low. The overall consensus of the Council is as follows: CCMIN05/38/93 -5- 5128193 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES GROUP II MAY 18, 1993 Approved staff recommendation on Maps No. 11 and 26 by unanimous COnSenSUS. Continued Maps 4, 25, 14, 19, 38, 17, 24, 18 and 60 in Group II to the meeting of June 15, 1993. ITEM ADDED TO THE AGENDA BASED ON SUBSEQUENT NEED It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to add Mitiaation of Impacts on Southwest SPorts Park {Area of Archeoloaical Sensitivity) to the Council agenda, based on a determination that an emergency situation exists which arose subsequent to the preparation of the agenda. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Mu~oz None None Mitiaation of Impacts on Southwest Sports Park (Area of Archeoloaical Sensitivity) City Attorney Scott Field advised the Council that the present location of the Motorsports Park may be a historic site of native American Indians. Attorney Field advised the Council that to determine the degree of archeological significance involved a series of pits will be dug and the contents removed and cataloged. Some of these pits will be on the City's property and some will be on the adjoining Dendy property. Attorney Field asked the Council to approve an expenditure of $20,000 to perform the digs on the site. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to appropriate $20,000 and authorized the City Manager or his designee to enter into a contract for the purpose of conducting archeological investigations of the site to identify the degree of sensitivity within portions of the City-owned property. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Muffoz None None CCMIN05/18/93 -6- 5/28193 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES CITY MANAGER REPORT None MAY 18, 1993 CITY ATTORNEY REPORT City Attorney Scott Field asked the Council to nominate two members to'serve as a sub- committee to participate in discussions with tribal leaders regarding the area of archeological sensitivity. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Mayor Mu~oz and Mayor Pro Tern Roberts volunteered to serve as the City Council sub- committee to participate in discussions regarding the area of archeological sensitivity. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to adjourn at 10:45 P.M. The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula City Council will be held on Tuesday, May 25, 1993, 7:00 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. June S. Greek, City Clerk Mayor J. Sal Mu~oz CCMIN05/18/93 -7- 5/28/93 ITEM NO. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN-CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINB AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $1,103,407.54 Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROV'RB AND ADO~, .this 22th day of June, 1993. ATTEST: J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] /"" R~sos ~17 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 93-__ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 22nd day of June, 1993 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOE: ABSENT: CO~CIL~-~ERS: CO~CILM~-~: CO~CILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk R~mom 3 17 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 06/03/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 06/11/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 06/22/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 06/03/93 TOTAL PAYROLL: $173,498.96 $76,499.65 $752,751,41 $100,657.52 TOTALLIST OF DEMANDS FOR06/22/93 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 100 190 191 192 193 210 250 280 ' 300 0 330 PAYROLL: 001 100 190 191 192 193 300 320 330 GENERAL GAS TAXFUND TCSD TCSD SERVICELEVEL A TCSD SERVICELEVELB TCSD SERVICE LEVELC TCSD SERVICE LEVELD CAPPAL PROJECTS- TCSD REDEVELOPMENTAGENCy4:;ip INSURANCEFUND VEHICLEFUND INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS COPY CENTER FUND GENERAL (PAYROLL) GAS TAX FUND (PAYROLL) TCSD (PAYROLL) TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A (PAYROLL) TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B (PAYROLL) TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C (PAYROLL) INSURANCE FUND (PAYROLL) INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PAYROLL) COPY CENTER FUND (PAYROLL) TOTALBYFUND: $228,71 8.02 $50,150.35 $33,175.99 $2,376.22 $477.54 $26,425.37 $184,651.91 $343,728.28 $78,760.02 $3,568.89 $258.93 $8,305.45 $42,153.05 $67,341.69 $11,794.76 $15,703.96 $395.10 $736.86 $1,462.39 $617.64 $1,157.66 $1,447.46 $1,103,407.64 $1,002,750.02 $100,657.52 $1,103,407.54 R~/~RED BY KARMA MC: RE ~.- ~ BY DAVE DIXON, CITY MANAG ,"R CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. VOUCHRE2 06/03193 09:05 CiTY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS 'PAGE 6 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 COIIIJNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A' 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSO SERVICE LEVEL C 280 REDEVELOt~4ENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 310 VEHICLES FUND 320 [NFORNATION SYSTEHS 330 COPY CENTER FUND TOTAL ANQUNT 86,610.07 8,028.31 10,030.26 34.2.02 629.85 1,039.57 60,600.00 555.~0 209.05 3,680.~8 3,973.95 173,498.96 VOUCHRE2 06/03/93 09:05 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK NUIIER 1O580 10581 10581 10581 10581 10685 264391 26/,391 264391 264391 264391 264391 264391 264391 264391 264391 2~391 26~391 264391 264~, t 2~391 293378 2933?8 2933?8 293378 293378 2933?8 293378 2933?8 2933?8 293378 2933?8 293378 293378 2933?8 293378 293378 2933?8 10691 10692 10693 10693 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER MANE 05/26/93 001000 DROVER, CHRIS 05/27/93 000155 DAVLIN 05/27/93 000155 DAVLIN 05/27/93 000155 DAVLIN 05127/93 000155 DAVLIN 05/28/93 001011 QUICKSILVER ENTERPRISE, 06/03/93 0004~, FIRSTAX (EDD) 06/03/93 000/*44 FIRSTAX (EDD) 06/03/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 06/03/93 000/,44 FIRSTAX (EDD) 06/03/93 0004/,4 FIRSTAX (EDD) 06/03/93 OOGf,~, FIRSTAX (EDD) 06/03/93 0004~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 06/03/9~ 000/,44 FIRSTAX (EDD) 06/03/93 0004/*/, FIRSTAX (EDD) 06/03/93 O004Z~, FIRSTAX (EDD) ~/03/93 000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 06/03/93 000~44 FIRSTAX (EO0) 06/03/93 O004z~ FIRSTAX (EDO) 06/03/93 0004~4 FIRSTAX (EDD) 06/03/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDO) 06/03/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EOD) 06/03/93 0002~4 FIRSTAX (EDD) 06/03/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 06/03/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 06/03/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 06/03/93 0002&S FIRSTAX (ZRS3 06/03/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 06/03/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 06/03/93 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 06/03/93 000283 FIRSTAX CIRS) 06/03/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 06/03/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 06/03/93 000283 FIRSTAX (ZRS) 06/03/93 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 06/03/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 06/03/93 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 06/03/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 06/03/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 06/03/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 06/03/93 000131 CARL WARREN & cO. ITEN DESCRIPTION RETAINER/ARCNEOLOGICAL 4/20/93 MEETING 4/27193 MEETING 5/11/93 NEET]NG 5/18/93 MEETING LOAN FROM CITY 00044/, CAIT 0004~ CAIT 000444 CAIT 0004~ CAIT O00~:~z~ CAIT 000444 CAIT 00~ ~IT 00~ ~IT 00~ ~ I 00~ ~I 00~ ~1 00~ ~I 00~ ~I 00~ ~l 00~ ~ I 000283 FICA/MED 00028~ FleA/NED 000283 FICA/NED 000283 FICA/MED 000283 FZCA/MED 000283 FICA/NED 000283 FICA/HED 000283 FICA/flED 000283 FIr, A/NED 000283 US[T 000283 US]T 000283 US]T 000283 USZT 000283 USlT 000283 USIT 000283 USZT 000283 USIT ANNA L~PIERRE 06/03/93 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER SIGNS 06/03/93 000138 CITICORP NORTH AMERICA JUNE 06/03/93 000138 CITICORP NORTH AMERICA JUNE ACCOUNT NENJER 001-161-999-5248 001-100-999-5250 001-100-999-5250 001-100-999-5250 001-100-999-5250 280-1500 001-2070 100-2070 190-2070 191-2070 193-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 001-2070 100-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 001-2070 100-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070- 193-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 001-2070 100-2070 190-2070 191-2070 193-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 300-199-999-5205 100-164-999-52~ 320-2800 320-199-999-5560 ITEM AMOUNT 10,000.00 505 .~/* 830,88 761.67 510.73 60,000.00 2,573.76 ~50.08 492.35 16,~6 33.26 22.41 52.62 15.59 1,005.5/* 177.87 2~.52 6.40 9.85 22.52 9.84 19.35 20.64 2,390.29 436.7.3 549.92 1/,.27 21.98 50.23 21,96 43.18 ~6.02 10,235.92 2,123.94 2,201.33 67.11 188.71 94.68 237.55 80.61 145.38 183.18 1,058.93 368.64 CHECK AMOUNT 10,000,00 2,608.72 60,000. O0 5,185.06 18,803.93 1/,5 183.18 1,/*27.57 VOUCHRE2 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 10695 10695 10696 10696 10697 10698 10698 10698 10698 10698 10698 10698 10700 10701 10701 10701 10702 10702 10702 10702 10702 10702 10702 10702 10702 10702 10702 09:05 CHECK DATE 06/03/93 06/03/93 06/03/93 06/03/95 06/03/93 06/03/93 06/03/93 06/03/93 06/03/93 06/03/93 06/03/93 06/03/93 06/03/93 06/03/93 06/03/93 06/03/93 06/03/93 06/03/93 06/03/93 06/03/93 06~03/93 06/03/93 06103193 06/03/93 06/03/93 06/03/93 06/03/93 06/03/93 06/03/93 VENDOR NUMBER 000175 000177 000177 000178 000178 000184 000196 000196 000196 00019~ 000196 000196 00019/, 000196 000206 00020~ 000?.39 000259 000?.39 000245 000265 000265 0002/,5 000245 000245 000245 000245 000265 000265 000245 VENDOR NAME GFOA CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHEC[ REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION CONFERENCE JULY 18-23/M GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT PAPER GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT FAX PAPER GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GTE ICNA RETIREMENT ICNA RETIREMENT ICMA RETIREMENT ICNA RETIREMENT ICNA RETIREMENT ICNA RETIREMENT ICNA RETIREMENT ICNA RETIREMENT NOTEBOOK NEIORY UPGRADE TAX 9~-690-0128 000196 DEF CONP 00019~ DEF CONP 000196 DEF CORP 00019/, DEF CONP 000194 DEF COMP 000196 DEF CORP 000194 DEF CONP 00019/, DEF COttiP KINKO#S COPIES COPIES L & N FERTILIZER NISC. SUPPLIES OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVZC FENA OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERV[C FINANCE OLSTEN TEMPORARY $ERVIC PV PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM PERS (HEALTH INSUR,PREM PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN PERS (HEALTH INSUR,PREM PERS (HEALTH INSUR,PREM PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR,PREM PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN INSURANCE PREMIUM/JUNE INSURANCE PREMIUM/JUNE INSIJRANCE PREMIUM/JURE INSURANCE PREMIUM/JUNE INSURANCE PREMIUM/JUNE INSURANCE PREMIUM/JUNE INSURANCE PREMIUM/JUNE INSURANCE PREMIUM/JURE INSURANCE PREMIUM/JUNE . INSURANCE PRENIUR/JUNE INSURANCE PREMIUM/JUNE 10703 06/03/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000266 PER REDE 10703 06/03/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 0002/,6 PER REDE 10703 06/03/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETZREM 000266 PERS RET 10703 06/03/93 0002/,6 PER$ EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 0002/,6 PERS RET 10703 06/03/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 0002/,6 PERS RET 10703 06/03/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES# RETiREM 0002/,6 PERS RET 10703 06/03/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000266 PERS RET 10703 06/03/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 10703 06/03/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 0002/,6 PERS RET 10703 06/03/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES# RETIREM 000266 PERS RET 10703 06/03/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES# RETIREM 000266 PERS RET 10703 06/03/93 000246 PER$ EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000266 $tJRVIVOR ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-160-~-5258 001-160-~-5220 001-160-~-5220 320-190-99~-5221 320-199-~9-5221 320-190-99~-5208 001-2080 100-2080 lm)-2080 191-2080 193-2080 300-2080 320-2080 330-2080 001-120-999-5222 100-1t4-~-5262 001-166-999-5118 001-160-9~9-5118 001-1t3-~-5118 001-2090 100-20~0 100-20~0 190-2090 191-20~0 192-2090 193-20~0 300-2090 330-2090 001-1170 001-150-999-5250 001-2130 100-2130 001-2390 100-Z$90 190-2390 191-Z]90 192-2390 193-2390 300-2390 320-2390 330-Z390 001-2390 ITEM ANOUNT 1,250. O0 19.37 200.00 15.50 2~.(~ 3,776.59 512.84, 582.. 19 31.19 38.12 19.03 281.01 50.00 65.60 192.22 58.73 125.85 151.02 13,927.90 2,669.44 1,090.71' 3,373.48 135.11 300.26 457.44 142.68 503.05 417.00 110.Z5 42.94 171.76 11,011 1,732.33 2,167.76 71.06 96.85 267.85 98.~6 219.15 218.07 56.61 'PAGE 3 CHEC AMOUNT 1,250.00 89.61 215.50 5,288.97 65.60 192.P-~ 335.60 21,025 · 68 VOUCHRE2 06/03/93 09:05 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUI~ER NAME 10703 06103193 0002/,6 PERS 10703 06/03193 000246 PER$ 10703 06103193 000246 PERS 10703 06/03/93 0002/,6 PER$ 10703 06/03/93 000246 PER$ 10703 06/03/93 000246 PERS 10703 06/03/93 0002/,6 PERS 10703 06/03/93 000246 PERS CiTY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERZOOS [TEN DESCKIPTIOR EMPLOYEES' RETIREH 000266 EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000266 EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000266 EMPLOYEES' RETIREH 000266 EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000266 EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000266 EMPLOYEES' RETIREH 000266 EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000266 10704 06103193 000249 PETTY CASH 10704 06103195 000269 PETTY CASH 10~}4 06/03/93 000249 PETTY CASH I070~ 06/03/93 000249 PETTY CASH 10704 06/03/93 000249 PETTY CASH 10704 06/03/93 000249 PETTY CASH 10704 06/03/93 000249 PETTY CASH 10706 06/03/93 000249 PETTY CASH 10704 06/03/93 000249 PETTY CASH 10704 06/03/93 000249 PETTY CASH 10705 06/03/93 000310 1Q.7.K 06/03/93 000320 1 06/03/93 000320 lO/uo 06/03/93 000320 10706 06/03/93 000320 10706 06/03/93 000320 10706 06/03/93 000320 10706 06/03/93 000320 10707 06/03/93 000322 SURVIVOR SURVIVOR SURVIVOR SURVIVOR SURVIVOR SURVIVOR SURVIVOR SURVIVOR PETTY CASH REIME. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REINB. PETTY CASH REI!I. PETTY CASH REIle. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REIIe. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REIMB. TEHECULA CREEK INN CATERING TOgN CENTER STATIONERS TOVN CENTER STATIONERS TOMN CENTER STATIONERS TOidN CENTER STATIONERS TOWN CENTER STATIONERS TOIdN CENTER STATIONERS TO~N CENTER STATIONERS MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES CREDIT MEMO LAND DEV. 09FFZCE SUPPLIES DISASTER RELIEF ACCOUNT OFFICE SUPPLIES ECOLOGY LTR PAD UNIGLONE BUTTERFIELD TR CONFERENCE LAKE TAHOE/D 10708 06/03/93 000325 UNITED 10708 06/03/93 000325 UNITED 10708 06/03/93 000325 UNITED 10708 06/03/93 000325 UNITED 10709 06/03/93 000326 10709 06/03/93 000326 10710 06/03/93 000345 10710 06/03/93 000365 10711 06/03/93 000374 10711 06/03/93 000374 10711 06/03/93 000374 10711 06/03/93 000374 10711 06/03/93 000374 10711 06/03/93 000374 1071'1 06/03/93 000374 MAY OF THE INLAN 000325 IN WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 IN MAY OF THE INLAN 000325 IN MAY OF THE INLAN 000325 IN UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 2"SETS OF UNIFORMS; CLE 2'SETS OF UNIFORMS; CLE XEROX CORPORATION BILL[ 5100 XEROX LEASE AGREEH XEROX CORPORATION BILLI HAINTENANCE INCREASE PE SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 4/22-5/20 4/22-5/20 4/22-5/20 6/22-5/20 4/22-5/20 4/22-5/20 4/22-5/20 ACCOUNT NUI~ER 100-2390 191-23~0 192-2390 300-239O 320-2390 530-2390 001 - 140-999-5258 O01 - 120 - 999 - 5220 001-163-999-5260 001 - 161-999-5222 001-100-999-5260 320-199-999-5221 001 - 161-999-5220 001-110-999-5260 001 - 110-999-5258 001-163-999-5222 001-140-999-5260 001-163-999-5220 001-163-999-5220 001-163-999-5242 001-161-999-5220 001-166-999-5242 001-163-999-5220 001-100-999-5220 001-110-999-5258 001-2120 100-2120 190-2120 300-2120 100-164-999-5243 100-1~4-999-5243 530-199-999-5582 330-199-999-5582 001-1~-gg9-5240 001-199-~-5240 001-199-999-5240 001-199-~-5240 001-199-~-5240 001-199-999-5240 001-199-999-5240 ITEM 8.59 12.~ 1.~ 1.~ 56.00 6.6~ 51.36 69.66 8.00 39.78 2.69 11.00 40. O0 4.20 329.63 6.16 68.86- 37.64 10.75 8.42 49.23 14.07 199.00 77.25 9.25 17.50 .50 267.79 26.50 2,3~5.00 613.11 8O8.36 69.55 66.61 63.47 90.46 111.99 357.53 PAGE CHECK N4OUNT 16,141.68 268.93 329.43 57.41 199.00 10~.50 2~.29 2,958.11 1,592.97 VOUCHRE2 06/03/93 09:05 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NLNBER NAIVE 10712 06/03/93 000389 USC~ 10712 06/03/93 000389 US(34 10712 06/03/93 000389 USC:N 10713 06/03/93 000398 CALIFORNIA INNICIPAL 1071/* 06/03/93 000~7 CONTROeIX OF HEHET 1071/* 06/03/93 000~7 COMTRONIX OF HENET 10714 06/03/93 000~,7 CONTRONIX OF HENET 10715 06/03/93 000512 CADET UNEFORN 10716 06/03/93 000527 RUNGLE, CHARLES 10717 06/03/93 0006~ ASCE 10718 06/03/93 000676 AUTONOTIVE SPECIALTIES 10719 06/03/93 000700 ARTS COUNCIL, THE 10720 06/03/93 000775 NUNINETRIX SYSTEN$ CORP 10721 06/03/93 000820 MINCHAK, KRIS 10721 06/03/93 000820 MINCHAK, KRIS 10722 06/03/93 000898 SAN DIEGO SOFTMARE SOLU 10722 06/03/93 000898 SAN DIEGO SOFTMARE SOLU 10723 06/03/93 000901 CPRS DISTRICT ELEVEN 1072/* 06/03/93 000907 TEHECULA CAR MASH 1072/* 06/03/93 000907 TEMECULA CAR MASH 1072~ 06/03/93 000907 TEHECULA CAR MASH 10725 06/03/93 000916 BANK OF AHERICA - CC 10726 06/03/93 000993 FREEDON COFFEE, INC. 10727 06/03/93 001003 CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY 10728 06/03/93 001010 TINE LIFE EXPO 10729 06/03/93 001016 ~ATKZN$ - F~REIRAN DESIG CITY OF TEHECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS l TEM DESCRIPTION 000389 PT RET l R 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR TREASURERS HANDBOOK 199 1100 HAH BATTERY SHIPPING TAX ENTRY RUG SERVICE; CiTY SPRAYED YARD/FLEAS TICK ASCE COURSE 5/12/93 REPAIR & BAINTEBANCE TO CS FUNDING CLERKS INDEX DATA COtaVE NAP CHECKING SERVICES F APRIL MORKERS CONP PREN ALPS P2100 DRIVER ASSY TAX DAY CANP TRAINING OIL CHANGES AND CAR MAS O/L CHANGES AND CAR MAS OIL CHANGES AND CAR MAS ANALYSIS SHORTFALL 1ST COFFE SERVICE DI F PROJECT EXPO FOR SENIORS TEHEOULA FZLN COUNCIL TOTAL CHECKS ACCOUNT NUIIER 001-2160 100-21~0 1~0-21e~) 001-140-~-5228 001 - 162-999-5220 001 - 162-~-5220 001 001-199-999-5250 001-170-~-5327 001 - 163-999-5258 310-164-999-5214 001-100-f99-5267 320-199-999-5250 001 - 163-999-52/.9 001-1182 320-199-~-5215 320- 190-180- 999- 5258 310-162-~-5214 310-164-~-521/, 310-162-9~-521/* 001-199-999-5252 001 - 199-~-5250 001 - 1/,0-~-5228 t99-183-938-5300 280-199-999-526A ITEN ANOUNT 91.82 2/*9.14 26.9/, 150.00 3.00 11.63 36.25 55. O0 190.00 150.00 20,000.00 600, O0 975, O0 5.59- 260.05 20.15 98.00 18.73 20.97 19.35 525.79 71.15 100.00 60.00 600.00 PAGE 5 -.~,,. CHECK AleXIT 1~4.63 34.25 55.00 1~0.00 150.00 ZO,O00.O0 600.00 969.41 ** 280.20 98.00 59.05 525.79 71.15 100,00 173,498.96 VOUCHRE2 06/11/93 15:21 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 COMMUNITy SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUNO 250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD 300 INSURANCE FUND 310 VEHICLES FUND 320 INFORNATION SYSTENS 330 COPY CENTER FUND TOTAL ANOUNT 51,528.55 4,769.54 10,072.03 1,473.20 47.69 1,784.0~ 3,000.00 274.28 72.39 49.88 3,007.32 420.73 7'6,499.65 VOUCHRE2 06111/93 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 1033/, 10730 10731 10735 10 736 10737 10738 10 738 10738 10738 10738 10738 10738 10738 10738 10739 10740 10740 10740 10741 10741 10741 10741 10741 10742 10743 10743 10743 10744 10744 10744 10745 10746 10746 10747 10747 15:21 CHECK DATE 05/13/93 06/10/93 06/10/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 VENDOR NUMBER 000597 000818 000253 000105 000114 000116 000116 000116 000116 000116 000116 000116 000116 000116 000120 000122 000122 000122 000140 O00140 000140 000140 000140 000144 000156 000156 000156 000162 000162 000162 000165 000168 000168 000184 000184 VENDOR NAME STATE MATER RESOURCES C SIGNAL MAINTENANCE, INC POSTMASTER BARRETT-SMiTH, THOMAS AE! SECURITY, !NC, AT & T AVP VISION PLAN AVP VISION PLAN AVP VISION PLAN AVP VISION PLAN AVP VISION PLAN AVP VISION PLAN AVP VISION PLAN AVP VISION PLAN AVP VISION PLAN BICKNELL TRAVEL CENTER BSN SPORTS BSN SPORTS BSN SPORTS COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE& ACCiDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COSTCO WHOLESALE DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTWA EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTWA EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTWA FEDERAL EXPRESS TEMECULA FLOt4ER CORRAL TEMECULA FLOI4ER CORRAL GTE GTE CITY OF TEMEOULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER/ODS ITEM DESCRIPTiON NOTICE OF iNTENT PURCHASE & INSTALL DETE BULK NAIL FOR RECREATIO CSD REFUND/BARRETT-SMIT ALARM MONITORiNG;TEEN C 7~2-069-60~4-001 5/25/ INS PREMIUM JUNE 1993 INS PREMIUM JUNE 1993 INS PREMIUM JUNE 1993 INS PREMIUM JUNE 1993 INS PREMiUM JUNE 1993 INS PREMiUM JUNE 1993 iNS PREMIUM JUNE 1993 INS PREMIUM JUNE 1993 INS PREMIUM JUNE 1993 TRAVEL TO WISCONS]N/MJ RECREATION SUPPLIES FREIGHT TAX INSURANCE JUNE 1993 INSURANCE JUNE 1993 INSURANCE JUNE 1993 INSURANCE JUNE 1993 INSURANCE JUNE 1993 AQUATIC SUPPLIES INSURANCE PREMIUM/JUNE INSURANCE PREMIUM/JUNE INSURANCE PREMIUM/JUNE SKU#303347 "'FAX ME PERI FREIGHT TAX MAIL FLOt~ERS FLOWERS 909-694-1989/MAy 909-695-3539/MAy ACCOUNT NUMBER 250-190-120-5802 100-164-~-5405 190-180-999-5Z30 190-183-4938 1~0-182- ~- 5250 320-199- ~-5208 001-2310 100-2310 190-2310 191-2310 193-2310 300-2310 001-1170 001 - 1180 330-2310 O01 - 140 - 999 - 5258 190-180-999-5300 190 - 180 - 999 - 5300 190-180-~99-5300 001-2330 1 O0 - 2330 190 - 2330 191-2330 193 - 2330 190-183-810-5300 O01 - 2340 1 O0 - 2340 001 - 150-999- 5250 320-199-~-5221 330 - 199- 999 - 5220 320-199-~-5221 001-110-~-5230 001-110-~-5260 001-2170 320-199-~-5208 320 - 199 - ~- 5208 ITEM AMOUNT 250.00 772.00 1,171.00 :~.00 35.00 11.11 406.96 97.15 97.15 7.09 8.66 3.94 15.73 24.95 15.73 368.00 ~5.78 2O.O0 50.05 121.00 19.50 138.25 11.48 14.02 200.00 41.85 13.95 15.00 354.00 8.50 27.44 52.60 60.34 217.66 1,9~.63 21.25 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 250.00 772.00 1,171.00 34.00 35.00 11.11 6?7.40 348. 715.8~ 304.25 200.00 70.80 389.94 52.60 278.00 VOUCXRE2 06/11/93 15:21 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUNBER DATE NUNBER NANE 10747 06/11/~ 000184 GTE 10748 06/11/93 000186 10748 06/11/93 000186 10748 06111/93 000186 HANKS HARDWARE HANKS HARDWARE HANKS HARDWARE 10749 06/11/93 000201 JENNACO 10750 06/11/93 000205 10751 06/11/93 000206 10752 06/11/93 00020~ 10753 06/11/93 000214 10754 06/11/93 000243 10755 06/11/93 000248 10755 06/11/93 000248 10756 06/11/93 000262 1,9256 06/11/93 000262 06/11/93 000262 10757 06/11/93 000266 10757 06/11/93 000266 10757 06/11/93 000266 10758 06/11/93 000268 10759 06/11/93 000291 10760 06/11/93 000294 10760 06/11/93 000294 10760 06/11/93 000294 10760 06/11/93 000294 10760 06/11/93 000294 10760 06/11/93 000294 10760 06/11/93 000294 10760 06/11/93 000294 10760 06/11/93 000294 10760 06/11/93 000294 10760 06/11/93 000294 10760 06/11/93 000294 10760 06/11/93 000294 10760 06/11/93 000294 10760 06/11/93 000294 10760 06/11/93 000294 10761 06/11/93 000306 KIDS PARTIES, ETC. KINKO'S COPIES L & N FERTILIZER LUNCH & STUFF CATERING PAYLESS DRUG STORE PETROLANE PETROLANE RANCHO WATER RANCHO WATER RANCHO WATER RIGHTWAY RIGHTWAY RIGHTWAY RIV. CO. HABITAT CONSER CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEN ACCOUNT ITEN DESCRIPTION NUNBER ANOUNT 909-699-Z309/NAy MISC, SUPPLIES NAINT. SUPPLIES ACCT 2636 05/31/93 STNT 320-199-999-5208 001-171-999-52/~ 100-16~-999-5218 190-183-905-5300 TEEN CENTER CLEANING 1~0-182-~-5212 SNO~CORE NACHINE RENTAL 190-183-800-5300 COP/ES 001-161-999-5222 NISC. SUPPLIES 100-164-999-5242 CATERING FOR COUNCIL 001-100-999-5260 FILN PROCESSING SERVICE 190-180-999-5250 PROPANE FUEL PROPANE FUEL 190-180-~99-5263 190-180-999-52~3 4/14-5/12 1~0-180-~99-5240 4/14-5/12 191-180-999-5240 4/14-5/12 19nJ-180.999.5240 VETERAN'S PARK TOILET R SPORTS PARK TOILET RENT SAN HICKS PARK TOILET R 190'180-999-5238 190-180-999-52~8 1~0-180-999-5238 NAY K-RAT 001-2,300 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T LOF STATE CONPENSATION INS. STATE CONPENSATION INS. STATE CONPENSATION INS. STATE CONPENSATION INS. STATE CONPENSAT]OR INS. STATE CONPENSATION INS. STATE CORPENSATION INS. STATE CONPENSATiON INS. STATE CONPENSATION INS. STATE CONPENSATION INS. STATE CQNPENSATION INS. STATE CONPENSATION INS. STATE CONPENSATION INS. STATE COIqPENSATION INS. STATE CONPENSAT]OR INS. STATE CORPENSATION INS. TENECULA VALLEY PIPE 310-180-~-5214 WORKERS' CONP / JUNE 93 001-2370 WORICERS# CORP / JUNE 93 100-2370 WORKERS~ CONP / JUNE 93 190-2370 WORKERS' CONP / JUNE 93 191-2370 WORKERS# CONP / JUNE 93 192-2370 WORKERS' CONP / JUNE 93 193-2370 WORKERS' CONP / JUNE 93 300-2370 KIRKERS' CORP / JUNE 93 320-2370 WORKERS' CONP / JUNE 93 330-2370 WORKERS~ CONP / JUNE ~ 001-1182 WORKERS' CONP / JUNE 93 001-2370 WORKERS' CONP / JUNE 9~ 001-110-999-5112 WORICERS' CONP / JUNE 93 001-140-999-5112 WORKERS~ CONP / JUNE fJ 190-2370 WORKERS' CONP / JUNE 93 001-2370 WORKERS, CONP / JUNE 93 001-1182 50 NARLEX ST. 90 TXT 3/190-180-999-5212 18.51 94.60 93.10 12.01 400.00 85.00 86.85 23.71 80.00 13.13 43.86 59.42 2,276.65 115.85 1,221.38 57.39 229.55 114.78 3,228.50 6,112.80 1,813,46 2,056.72 115.92 13.32 242.73 43.62 132.10 227.48 8.72 7.41 .14 .35 4.37 48.50 22.57 · PAGE 3 CHECK ANOUNT 1,98~ .39 199.71 400. O0 85. O0 86.85 23.71 80. O0 13.13 103.28 3,613.88 401.72 3,228.50 41.88 10,832.39 22.57 VOUCHRE2 06111193 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 10762 10763 10764 .10764 10764 10764 10765 10766 10766 10766 10766 10766 10767 10768 10769 10.769 10769 10769 10769 10769 10769 10769 10769 10769 10769 10769 10769 10769 10769 10769 10769 10769 10769 10769 10769 10769 10770 10771 10772 1077~ 15:21 CHECK DATE 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 VENDOR NUMBER 000307 000310 000320 000320 000320 000320 000322 000326 000326 000326 000326 000326 000339 000342 000374 000374 000374 000374 000374 000374 000374 000374 000374 000374 000374 000374 000374 000374 000374 000374 000374 000374 000374 000374 000374 000374 0003?5 000403 000414 000426 VENDOR NAME TEMECULA TROPHY TEMECULA CREEK INN TOWN CENTER STATIONERS TOWN CENTER STATIONERS TO~ CENTER STATIONERS TOWN CENTER STATIONERS UNIGLORE BUTTERFIELD TR UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY WINDSOR PARTNERS - RANC SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR SHAWN SCOTT POOL & SPA LONGS DRUG STORE RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION AWARD TROPHIES EMPLOYEE RECOGN/T/ON DI OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES FINANCIAL CALCULATOR FINANCIAL CALCULATOR AIRFARE/LEAGUE OF CITIE ORANGE COATS W NAHE EMB BRN CAP/BRAO B 2-SETS OF UNIFORMS CLAE REED & STERLING UNIFORM REED & STERLING UNIFORM CA CD AN vll & 11A 2BK JUNE RENT 4/21-5/20 4/29-5/29 4/29/5/29 4/29-5/29 4/29-5/29 4/13-5/12 4/13-5/12 4/21-5/19 4/21-5/19 04/22-05/20/93 04/22-05/20/93 4/22-5/21 4/21-5/20 4/21-5/20 4/21-5/20 4/21-5/20 4/21-5/20 4/21-5/20 4/21-5/20 4/23-5/24 4/26-5/26 4/26-5/26 909-202-4767 GT MAY POOL SERVICE/CHLORE FILM DEVE, JANITORIAL SLIPPLIES ACCOUNT NUNBER 190-182-999-5300 001-150-999-5265 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 001-163-999-5220 001-163-999-5220 001-100-999-5258 100-164-999-5243 100-164-999-5243 100-164-999-5243 190-180-999-5243 190-180-999-5243 001-120-999-5228 001-199-999-5234 190-182-999-5240 191-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5500 193-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5500 191-180-999-5500 001-199-999-5240 001-199-999-5240 191-180-999-5500 191-180-999-5500 191-180-999-5500 190-182-999-5240 190-182-999-5240 190-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5500 191-180-999-5500 193-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5500 001-161-999-5208 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5220 001-199-999-5212 ITEM AMOUNT 25 500,00 14.69 96.92 33.47 34.37 ,U,O.O0 211.97 55.82 12.50 13.60 13.60 46.85 29,427.14 129.05 27.87 12.90 12.90 142.52 26.46 12.47 7.28 427.99 784.59 129.81 124,46 119.46 189.14 58.59 22.14 36.76 154.03 165.45 12.90 163.43 35.79 110.00 21,00 265.53 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 25.86 500.00 179.45 440.00 307.49 46.85 29,427.14 2,894.04 35.79 110.00 21.00 VOUCHRE2 06/11/93 15:21 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 1O773 10774 10774 10774 10774 10775 10775 10775 10775 10775 10775 10775 1O775 10775 10775 · 10776 10777 lpz~ 10780 10781 10782 10782 10782 10782 1O782 10783 10784 10785 10786 10787 10787 10787 10787 10787 10787 10787 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06111/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 06/11/93 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000431 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, 000431 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, 000~31 NAT]ORAL DENTAL HEALTH, 000431 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, 000431 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, 000~31 NAT]ORAL DENTAL HEALTH, 000431 NAT]ORAL DENTAL HEALTH, 000431 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, 000/,31 NAT]ORAL DENTAL HEALTH, 000431 NAT]ORAL DENTAL HEALTH, 000/,74 ARBOR-PRO TREE SERVICE 000489 COBB GROUP 000518 DEL RIO CARE ANIMAL HOS 000557 JOHNSON REPEATER 000558 ADVANCED MOBZLCOHN 000602 DEAN'S PHOTO 000642 000642 000642 000642 0006~2 CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX CITY OF TENECULA - FLEX CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX 000643 FORTNER HARDWARE 000644 ASCE 0006~8 BANANA BLUEPRINT 000730 EDVALSOR, HARI~30D 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 GROUP AMERICA CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 2 CN VANDALEX /NSURANCE PREMIUM/JUNE INSURANCE PRENIUM/JUME INSURANCE PREMIUM/JUNE INSURANCE PREMIUM/JUNE INSURANCE PREMIUM/JUNE INSURANCE PREMIUM/JUNE INSURANCE PREMIUM/JUNE INSURANCE PREMIUM/JUNE INSURANCE PREMIUM/JUNE INSURANCE PREMIUM/JUNE INSURANCE PREMIUM/JUNE INSURANCE PREMIUM/JUNE INSURANCE PREMIUM/JUNE INSURANCE PREMIUM/JUNE 50 TREES TO BE TRINelED SUBSCRIPTION VET SERVICES AS NEEDED MONTHLY PALOMAR BASE, N MONTHLY ELSINORE BASE U BATTERIES MAINTAIN BALANCE MAINTAIN BALANCE MAINTAIN BALANCE MAINTAIN BALANCE MAINTAIN BALANCE ACCT 10629 5/31/93 STNT MEMBERSHIP/RAY CASEY BLUEPRINTS RE/MB. WORKSHOP PREMIUM FOR JUNE 1993 PREMIUM FOR JUNE 1993 PREMIUM FOR JUNE 1993 PREMIUM FOR JUNE 1993 PREMIUM FOR JUNE 1993 PREMIUM FOR JUNE 1993 PREMIUM FOR JUNE 1993 ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-180-999-5212 001-2510 100-2510 190-2510 300-2510 001-2340 100-Z340 190-ZT~O 191-2340 192-Z340 193-Z~0 300-2340 330-2340 001-1180 001-150-999-5250 100-164-999-5402 320-199-999-5228 001-170-999-5285 320-1~9-999-5209 320-199-999-5209 001-162-999-5250 001-1020 190-1020 193-1020 300-1020 330-1020 190-180-999-5212 001-163-999-5226 250-190-129-5802 001-110-999-5258 001-2360 100-2360 190-2360 191-2360 192-2360 193-2360 300-2360 ITEM AMOUNT 7.33 225.42 26.18 84.90 1.80 590.62 94.50 110.25 7.09 15.75 8.66 7.88 31.50 47.25 15.00 950.00 89.00 19.80 186.00 195.30 17.69 3,657.54 412.73 172.83 1.10 100.00 125,25 35.00 24.28 107.24 553.38 78.37 123.50 4.28 9.50 14.72 4.75 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 272.86 338.30 928.50 950.00 89.00 19.80 186.00 195.30 17.69 4,344.20 125.25 35.00 24.28 107.24 VOUCHRE2 06111/93 15:21 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUHBER 10787 06/11/93 000765 10787 06/11/93 000765 10787 06/11/93 000765 10787 06/11/93 000765 '10787 06/11/93 000765 10787 06/11/93 000765 10787 06/11/93 000765 10787 06/11/93 000765 10787 06/11/93 000765 10787 06/11/93 000765 10787 06/11/93 000765 10787 06/11/93 000765 10787 06/11/93 000765 10787 06/11/93 000765 10787 06/11/93 000765 10787 06/11/93 000765 10787 06/11/93 000765 10787 06/11/93 000765 10787 06/11/93 000765 10787 06/11/93 000765 10787 06/11/93 000765 10787 06/11/93 000765 10787 06/11/93 000765 10788 06/11/93 000907 10788 06/11/93 000907 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEN NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ANIXINT GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP ANER I CA GROtJP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP ANER I CA GROUP AIqERICA GROUP ANERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA TEMECULA CAR WASH TENECULA CAR WASH 10789 06/11/93 000914 CNOA 107~0 06/11/93 000949 10791 06/11/93 0009~1 10791 06/11/93 000991 10791 06/11/93 000991 10791 06/11/93 000991 10791 06/11/93 000991 10791 06/11/93 000991 10791 06/11/93' 000991 10791 06/11/93 000991 10792 06/11/93 001002 10792 06/11/93 001002 10793 06/11/93 001008 10793 06/11/93 001008 10793 06/11/93 001008 10794 06/11/93 001021 GKN RENTALS THE RESCUE SOURCE THE RESCUE SOURCE THE RESCUE SOURCE THE RESCUE SOURCE THE RESCUE SOURCE THE RESCUE SOURCE' THE RESCUE SOURCE THE RESCUE SOURCE FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - RIVERSIDE MOTORCYCLE CE RIVERSIDE MOTORCYCLE CE RIVERSIDE MOTORCYCLE CE CALIF GANG INVESTIGATOR THOMPSON PUBLISHING GRO 10795 06/11/93 001022 PRENIUN FOR JUNE 1~3 320-2360 PREMIUM FOR JUNE 1~3 330-2360 PREMIUM FOR JUNE l~j)] 001-2360 PREMIUM FOR JUNE lW3 001-2380 PREMILIN FOR JUNE 1~ 100-?,380 PREMIUM FOR JUNE 1~3 1~0-2380 PREMIUM FOR JUNE 1993 191-2380 PREMIUM FOR JUNE l~j~ 192-2380 PREMIUM FOR JUNE l~j~] 1~J-2380 PREMIUM FOR JUNE 1~3 300-2380 PREMIUN FOR JUNE 1993 320-2380 PRENZUN FOR JUNE 1~3 330-2380 PREMIUM FOR JUNE 1~3 001-2380 PREMIUM FOR JUNE 1~ 001-2500 PREMIUM FOR JUNE l{~j~ 100-2500 PREMIUM FOR JUNE 1~3 190-2500 PRENZUN FOR JUNE lf~j~ 191-2500 PRENIUN FOR JUNE 1993 192-2500 PREMIUM FOR JUNE 1~3 193-2500 PRENIUN FOR JUNE l~"j~ 300-2500 PREMIUM FOR JUNE 1~3 320-2500 PRENIUN FOR JUNE 1~3 330-2500 PREMIUN FOR JUNE 1~3 001-2500 WASH 310-164-999-5214 CAR WASH 310-164-999-5214 STREET DRUGS WORKSHOP/S 001-170-999-5258 HI-WHEEL WEED MC)WER/NON 100-164-999-5238 PF76502 AMERICA CUP/R]V 001-171-~-5242 BG]1802 70' THROWBAG, 3 '001-171-~-5242 BG31652 50,, THROi4BAG, 1 001-171-~9-5242 KN71502 KNIFE, FROST, 4 001-171-9~-5242 WH79052 WHISTLE, FOX 40 001-171-~9~-5242 BC~2302 ROPE BAG, ~fJ BA 001-171-~99-5242 BCG0852 BAG, DUFFLE, LA 001-171-9~-5242 TAX 001-171-~-5242 5473666403910057/SN 5473666403910057/SN 190-180-999-5260 190-180-999-5258 REPLACENENT OF CYLINDER LABOR TAX 001-170-999-5214 001-170-999-5214 001-170-999-5214 GANG VIOLENCE CONFERENC 001-170-999-5258 COBRA HANDBOOK 001-150-~;~-5228 9.50 19.00 9.50 840.93 126,87 160.81 5.36 7.43 19.07 7.58 15.05 15.07 8.77 188.96 28.46 36.67 1.22 1.69 4.34 1,?Z 3.43 3.43 2.00 4.00 4.00 160.00 352.00 79.00 69.95 75.90 65. O0 16.00 23.95 78.50 29.60 21,71 331.63 486.84 275.00 37.75 280. O0 282.50 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 2,305., 8.00 160.00' 352.00 437.90 353.3~ 799.57 280.00 282.50,~,, VOUCHRE2 06/11/93 15:21 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUNBER DATE 107~6 06/11/93 10797 06/11/93 10798 06/11/93 10799 06/11/93 VENDOR NUNBER 001023 001024 001025 001027 VENDOR NANE K-HART RANCHO URGENT CARE CENT NATIONAL BUSINESSla3NAN' NETROPOL/TAN 14ATER DZST CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEN ACCOUNT DESCR]PT]OR NUNBER AQUATIC SUPPLIES 190-183-810-5300 NEDICAL EXAN/CLASS B DR 001-161-999-5258 PI34ERFUL COlel SKILLS FO 001-120-999-5258 PLAN CHECK 210-190-120-5802 TOTAL CHECKS ZTEN ANOUNT 200.00 66.00 207.00 3,000.00 PAGE 7 CHECK ANOUNT 200.00 66.00 207.00 3,000.00 76,499.65 VOUCNRE~ 10:62 CITY OF TENECtJLA VCXJCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERZODS PAGE 5 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUel) 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 COle4UNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERV/CE LEVEL A 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL INPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSO 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 COPY CENTER FUND TOTAL AMOUNT 92,57V.60 37,352,50 13,07~.70 561.00 2~,601.76 181,651.91 363,656. O0 18,160.02 2,961.10 1,617.65 37,758.37 752,751.61 VOUCHRE2 06/14/93 VOUCHER/ CHECK NLIHBER 10809 10809 10809 10809 10809 10809 10810 10810 10810 10810 10810 10810 10810 10810 10810 10810 10810 10810 10810 10811 10813 10814 10814 10815 10815 10816 10817 10817 10817 10817 10817 10818 10818 10819 10819 10819 10819 10820 10:42 CHECK DATE 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 VENDOR NUMBER 000123 000123 000123 000123 000123 000123 000126 000126 000126 000126 000126 000126 000126 000126 000126 000126 000126 000126 000126 000164 0O0178 000178 000207 000217 000217 000220 000220 000224 000226 000226 000226 000226 000226 000238 000238 000267 000267 000267 000267 000269 VENDOR NAME BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS BURKE WILLJAMS & SORENS BURKE gILLJAMS & SORENS BURKE ~ILLIAMS & SORENS CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE ESGIL CORPORATION GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO KLEINFELDER MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS NAURICE PRINTERS QUICK MAURICE PRINTERS QUICK MELAD & ASSOCIATES MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT FINAL TOUCH MARKETING FINAL TOUCH MARKETING RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE D RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE D RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE D RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE D RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER!OOS ITEM DESCRIPTION LEGAL/APRIL SERV, LEGAL/MAR SERV, TAX INCREMENT BONDS LEGAL/MAR. SERV, LEGAL SERVICES/APRIL 93 LEGAL/APRIL SERV. ANNUAL LANDSCAPE CONTRA ANNUAL LANDSCAPE CONTRA ANNUAL LANDSCAPE CONTRA INSTALL LANDSCAPE IMPRO REMOVE SILT AND FILL DE INSTALL PLANT MATERIAL LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS HERBICZDE APPLICATION 0 IRRIGATION REPAIRS ON ~ IRRIGATION REPAIRS ON W 3170; $N)DLEWOO0 IRRIGA 3165; VILLAGES II ]RR]G 3172; SUMMIT TREE REPLA PLAN CHECK FEE 80386SX 25MHZ 8SLOT MB TAX SERVICE 2/06-3/06 ADULT SOFTBALL GAMES,OF ADULT SOFTBALL GAMES,OF COVERS FOR FY 1993-94; TAX PLAN CHECK FEE 41ZOOM SEAGATE 1GB SCSl G20055 SCSI EXT. DRIVE C G20055 SCSI EXT DRIVE C TAX TAX 1993 MARKETING PROGRAM 1993 MARKETING PROGRAM FIRE 'SERVE/CREDIT FIRE SERVICE/OCT-DEC. 9 FIRE SERVE/JAN-MAR FIRE SERVICE/APRIL-JUNE FIRST QUALITY (ELITE) C ACCOUNT NUNitER 001-130-999-5246 300-1~-~-5205 001-130-~99-5246 001-130-999-5246 001-130-9~-5246 001-130-~9-5246 1~0-180-~-5250 191-180-~-5510 19nJ-180-999-5510 1~0-180-~9~-5212 190-180-~-5212 193-180-~9-5510 lf3-180-~fg-5510 lr3-18o-~9~-551o 193-18o-~-551o 193-18o-~9~-551o 1~3-18o-~99-551o 193-18o-~-551o 193-18o-~9-551o oo1-162-~-5248 oo1-17o-~-56o4 oo1-17o-~-56o4 001-13&0 190-18~-905-5300 190-183-907-5300 001-140-999-5222 001-140-~-5222 001-162-~-5248 001-170-~9~-5604 001-170-~-5604 320-1~-~9~-5221 001-170-~-5604 320-1~-~-5221 280-1655 280-199-9~-5264 001-171-~-5251 001-171-99~-5251 001-171-~-5251 001-171-~-5251 330-199-999-5590 ITEM AMOUNT 3,150.00 2,941.10 1,121.63 9,155.12 11,413.77 6,757.72 10,029.30 561.00 21,738.16 58.40 128.00 335.10 74.20 486.80 281.75 113.65 149.85 272.25 150,00 1,911.00 7,371.00 571.25 4,000.00 968.00 330.00 977. O0 75,72 1,129.15 2,458.00 318.00 318.00 215.14 24.65 12,600.00 2,666.67 I09,368.92- 101,728.33- 88,416.70 125,503.12 1,1~9,40 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 34,539.34 34,378.46 1,911.00 7,942.25 4,000.00 1,298.00 1,052.72 1,129.15 3,333.7~ 15,266.67 2,822.57 VOUCHRE2 06114193 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 10820 10821 10822 10822 10822 10822 10822 10822 10822 10822 10822 10822 10822 10822 1082~ 10823 10824 10824 10824 10825 10826 10827 1O828 10828 10829 10829 10829 10829 10830 10831 10831 10831 10832 10833 10833 10833 10833 10:42 CHECK DATE 06122193 06/22/93 06122193 06/22193 06122/93 06/22/93 06122193 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 06/22/93 VENDOR NUMBER 000269 000271 000329 000329 000329 000329 000329 000329 000329 000329 000329 000329 000329 000329 000354 000354 000360 000360 000360 000437 000513 000712 000756 000756 000818 000818 000818 000818 000822 000883 000883 000883 000884 000928 000928 000928 000928 VENDOR NAME RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY TAX ROBERT BEIN, MM FROST & URBAN DESIGN STUDIO URBAN DESIGN STUDIO URBAN DESIGN STUDIO URBAN DESIGN STUDIO URBAN DESIGN STUDIO URBAN DESIGN STUDIO URBAN DESIGN STUDIO URBAN DESIGN STUDIO URBAN DESIGN STUDIO URBAN DESIGN STUDIO URBAN DESIGN STUDIO URBAN DESIGN STUDIO RIVERSIDE COUNTY HEALTH RIVERSIDE COUNTY HEALTH GREEK, HAROLD F. GREEK, HAROLD F. GREEK, HAROLD F. MORELAND & ASSOCIATES SIMMONS, BECKY MCLEAN FORD, STEVEN J. IPS SERVICES, INC. ]PS SERVICES, INC. SIGNAL MAINTENANCE, INC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE, INC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE, INC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE, ]NC DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIA MONTELEONE EXCAVATING NONTELEORE EXCAVATING MORTELEONE EXCAVATING LARUE PAINTING LEKOS ELECTRIC, INC, LEKOS ELECTRIC, INC. LEKOS ELECTRIC, INC. LEKOS ELECTRIC, INC. CITY OF TEMEOULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER/OOS ITEM DESCRIPTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES F OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN CREDIT/ACTIVITY INCON. OLD TO~N SPEC. PLAN TENECULA OLD TOWN SPEC. OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN OLD TOMN SPECIFIC PLAN ADJUSTMENT ADJUSTMENT URBAN UES]GN STUDIO OLD TO~ SPECIFIC PLAN RETENTION ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES CREDIT/FOOTING ERROR LANDSCAPE &IRRIGAT]ON INSPECTION AUDITORS FOR CITY FINAN WORDPERFECT TRAINING COORDINATION CRC GRADING AND PARKING POR RETENTION EXTRA WORK/INSTALLED NE EXTRA WORK/CONTROLLER C Pkl92-06 TRAFFIC SIGNAL RETENTION PROFESSIONAL EMERGENCY WORK ON SANTIAGO CREEK; DELETING OF DESILTING P EXTRA WORK INVOICE GRAFFITI REMOVAL FOR AP PROJECT NO; PW92-08 RETENTION I:q.192-08 TRAFFIC SIGNAL RETENTION ACCOUNT NUMBER 330-199-999-5590 100-164-999-5248 001-161-999-5248 001-161-999-5248 280-199-999-5808 280-199-999-5808 001-161-999-52~8 160-199-801-5808 280-199-999-5808 160-199-801-5808 280-199-999-5808 280-199-999-5808 001-161-999-5248 001-2030 001-172-999-5255 001-172-999-5255 190-180-999-5250 190-180-999-5250 190-180-999-5250 001-140-999-5248 320-199-999-5250 250-190-129-5804 210-199-801-580~ 210-2035 001-166-999-5405 001-166-999-5405 210-165-611-5804 210-2035 100-16~-999-5402 100-164-999-5402 100-164-999-5402 100-164-999-5402 001-170-999-5293 210-165-611-5804 001-2035 210-165-611-5804 210-2035 ITEM AMOUNT 92.95 5,800.00 5,974.72 2,450.00- 350,62 265.49 991.46 81,919.T3 20,600.00- 81,919.73' 48,279.77 25,402.53' 5,238.14' 5,813.09 7,267.80 35.00' 475.00 1,120.00 6,056.65 1,275.00 6,440.00 171,540.60 17,154.06- 801.77 1,391.32 19,88~.75 1,988.38- 1,060.00 7,000.00 10,400.00 2,926.00 5,110.00 4,780.00 478.00' 5,100.00 510.00' PAGE.._~, CHECK AMOUNT 1,29235 5,800.00 2,405.90 13,080.89 1,560.0 6,056.65 1,275.00 6,~0.00 154,386.54 20,088.46 1,060.00 20,326.00 5,110.00 8,892.00 VOUCHRE2 06/16/93 10:~2 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 10834 ()6/22/93 10834 06/22/93 10835 06/22/93 10835 06/22/93 10836 06/22/93 10837 06/22/93 10837 06/22/93 10838 06/22/93 10839 06/22/93 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 000929 T.B. PENICK 000929 T.B. PENICK 000979 000979 000982 DEL RIO ENTERPRISE DEL RIO ENTERPRISE BONSALL PETROLEUM CONST 001006 BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS 001006 001012 001013 CONSTRUCTION OF THE CON RETENTION VIA LOBO CLEAN-UP DES]L CHANNEL CLEANUP REPLACE DAIMGED ASPHALT MICROFILMING EQUIP. BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS MICROFILMING EQUIP, L,E, MORRISON SAND PLAN MOVING MATERIAL FRON CH HINDERLITER deLANAS & A SALES TAX AUDIT FOR THE ACCOUNT NUMBER 250-190-129-580/, 250-2035 100-164-999-5402 100-164-999-5402 100-164-999-5402 330-1940 330-1940 001-166-999-5401 001-140-999-5248 ITEM AMOUNT 374,460.00 37,446.00- 7,471.00 1,030.50 1,665.00 29,868.90 6,597.12 2,880.00 10,777.15 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 337,014.00 8,501.50 1,665.00 36,466.02 2,880.00 10,777.15 TOTAL CHECKS 752,751.41 ITEM NO. 4 I~PPROV~L CITY ~TTORN~Y ~ FIITANCE OFFIC:F~ CITY I~QER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 22, 1993 SUBJECT: REVISED SOLIDWASTE RATES FOR FY 1993-94 PREPARED BY: ~ RECOMMENDATION: SHAWN D. NELSON, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR That the Board of Directors: Receive and file the revised solid waste rates for commercial, industrial, and multi- family refuse and recycling services in the City of Temecula. DISCUSSION: Pursuant to the existing solid waste franchise agreement with Temecula Environmental, the City Manager has the authority to approve non- disputed rate increases that relate to the annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) or Landfill Tipping Fee adjustments from Riverside County. Effective July 1, 1993, the County of Riverside increased Landfill Tipping Fees by $3.00 per ton to $34.50 per ton, and the CPI increase for Riverside County has been identified at 3%.' Utilizing the existing formula in the franchise agreement, staff has reviewed the attached fee increases for commercial, industrial, and multi-family refuse and recycling services in the City of Temecula. These fee increases accurately reflect the pass- through costs of the CPI and County Landfill Tipping Fees. Therefore, staff has approved the rate increase for FY 1993-94. The proposed residential recycling and refuse collection rate will be considered by the Board of Directors at the June 22, 1993 Public Hearing concerning the TCSD Rates and Charges for FY 1993-94. A comparison of rates from last year to this year has been included for your review. FISCAL IMPACT: The additional fee increases will be passed on to commercial, industrial, and multi-family customers in the City. No additional costs will be borne by the. City of Temecula since these services are billed directly to the customer by Temecula Environmental. CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT "D" Schedule of Rates Service Description Effective July 1. 1992 3. Mechanized single family attached & detached residential additional refuse, composting, & recycling container - grantee billing (Monthly per container) $ 4.13 4. Single Family Attached & Detached Residential Additional Bulky Item Pickup - Grantee Billing (Pickup Rate) 5.17 5. Commercial, Industrial, and Multi- Family Residential Refuse Monthly Bin Rates (one 2 cubic yard bin) 54.41 6. Commercial, Industrial, and Multi- Family Residential Refuse Monthly Bin Rates (one 3 cubic yard bin) 64.41 7. Commercial, Industrial & Multi- Family Residential Refuse Monthly Bin Rates (one 3 cubic yard bin) 30.92 8. Commercial, Industrial, & Multi- Family Residential Recycling Monthly Bin Rates (one 4 cubic year bin) 74.41 9. Commercial, Industrial, and Multi- Family Residential Recvclinq Monthly bin Rates (one 4 cubic yard bin) 40.92 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Temporary 3 Cubic Yard Bin Rate: Extra temporary 3 cubic yard Pickup Redelivery & Reinstatement Rate Rolloff Disposal Rate Rolloff Recycling Rate Rolloff Compactor Rate Rolloff Recycling Compactor Rate 54.10 30.00 25.77 134.00 134. O0 268.00 268.00 Effective July 1. 1993 4.73 5.79 58.31 68.52 31.58 78.74 41.80 57.99 31.27 26.32 136.87 136.87 273.75 273.75 1 a\reports~,9293chgs 061493 SCHEDULE OF RATES July 1, 1993 ....~'. .3:E h": .~".: Mechanized single hmily attached and detached residentiS-additional refuse, cornposting,' ...... gCli billi g ' ' ' 5;. 21. "' ]Commercial, industrial, ahd multi:family reiide~tial-r~fuSe ~onthly5 bi~'-rates (dne 2 ~bic' "' ": "" · 1 X week $. 58.3 1 - : --"' "" 6 'x week ' $349.86 ' ' :"'.: -' .~. :'--.Compacted 2 Cubic Yard pick up:' "2.5 x weekly$ 26.17 ' ' ' . . '~'" Compacted 3 ~bic Yard pick up:.; · "- ....' "'.2~5 x .weedy pick up rate :" -L~3:i,'-"".'.,.."" .' "-'.'-":"'. ,'-."".:', (effective July l, 1993): 'j,. "-'-' '...."',:. · '. :..': .,, 7.:-. :-'..',,,uiU rally reiaae, ii t "Commerci~;-industfiai~:'- ........."':":: ': ' ' ' ":' " ' ' ' (o e.'s '."' ' ..~ · '~. ,','.~'" '," cubic y~d bin) ~th folloWrig pick ups per week:..- :: ..c.:'-. '.....: ,. ,.....':. ' . .. ,. "" :'-"' ,. "" '.' ' L .',-""" .:~L.::: :':'-;'.:c' ;Z:' :'.," "~.,. 3. <' ":"-'.." '- .. ._.~, . . .. .... · ' '' - " :, ':'. ,-;1 .x week ..~.'C: $' 3158' ' ~ .-., ~:'.-','..,~,;"..~' :;.:....::.. ~.;..,, :., .-:~.' .:,'...,",.:'.:...,.<,.- '. -.:. :-:' ::.Z:; .??' .. :.- .., . ... _ . ,' ' ' .' '.. -. -. '2-....,'" 2 x week ,. '.~ $ 63,16 '. L" ' -:':' ': Lf.:',-:..-":,.-:: 3xweek$.94,74:""' '.-: ::'..:~ ,. ·· , ~. , '=, ........'; ' : ....-"' 4 x week'.'$126,32--L" ' '- .-": .... . .. , ~. . ., -. -: :. ' ' -'' .' ' ,: 5.~week: .'$157,90.. · · " : ' "" ' " ""' 6 x,week .' $189,48. ..-' ' 7Z -YX Week $221,06 · ..; ,., ...' ' . ,... ,. . ,:' ':. ~ '.'.. '.. .. ' . . .' up ' ,. · .. 2-:Non-Coniracted 3 Cubic Yard pick : -" "-" $ 20,66 . ..-:8, :-Commercial, industrial; and multi:~amily: resiae~ii~ ~efuse monthly bin rates (o~ 4 ~bic ". -' yard bin) with following pick ups per week: -. "." ', . , .. ....., .... -.:,.. :..~ ...... 1 x week - $ 78,74. "' ' ::' ...' z . .2 xweek.'- $157,48 . · '- ... '3 x .Week $~6,22 .' -. ..... 4 x-week . $314,96 ' .: .: '- , :. 5 x week $393,70 · "' -. . 6 'x week $472,44 "' - - .. :~ 7x..week :$551.18 .- : .' · .' Non-contracted 4 Cubic Yard pick up: ' . . "' ~; '. . "'" ' $ 36.38 .~..,, , Compacted 4 Cubic Yard pick up: -.. ".' 2~5 x. Weekly pick up rate 9.- '- Commercial, industrial, and m~lti-famil~'residenti~ recycling momhly bin:rates (one 4 cubic yard bin) with following pick ups per week: ' L -... ,-:' ' '." 1 x week $ 41.80: ... ". '- ' · .2 x'week :$- 83.60 ': · "' """" " ' : · 3 x week: . $125.40, : ' ' '. ".':"':."'" .... '* :. ' -?..4 x week.'$167.20 ....--', ":' -' . ': :': .' '...;'/:- "' .... -- . · ". · -"" ':~ ~5 x week':$209.00 ' ""' .... : . - , .. ~ " '.. ". '~. -.6 x ·week -. $250.80 .... ~-: .- · -.: . 7 X week ~$292L60 ""' "':::' Nom~on cte ubicYard ic U: $ ~ · .......... :.'~ :,: .~,. ,. ,... · . ...... .; . , ,.: .... - .. '-'. ~..~" .. ' ~" 10. Tempor~ 3 cubic yard bin rate: ...."' ': $ '57.99 .:".- · .:..~..:..,..-. ..~.....,, .:~:..:. , . . .. :,.... :,.. ......-.,~..,...,.:. '-. 11: - - E~'tra tempora~ 3 cubic yard pick up:.. -' $ 31.27 ." - " ...-.. .... .: ....-.:.. :: , ., .. : . ,., . .. ~ -. :... '_.12~ ... Redelive~ .an~ reinstatement rate:, ~, $: 26.32 '. .:.:.,.. :<.-..-.- ,.: .... .~..,..: ::, ..,. ':, 13.' R~ll-offd~sp6shirate: ' "~:" :' -" .'., .... - . '.,,' " "' $136.87. landrdl/rd~d~[f~.. 14.' "- R011-off re~cli~grate: " ' "' '" .....:" "':" ' "":" ' ' " .. - - :.. $136.87 min~ m~k~t ~alug 15. Roll-off compactor rate: $273'.75', !a~dfill/r~d~r "t !!OtqTKLy DATA "' (lg62.-,64=100 ~ otbs, sdse At.t. ~ COUSINDR Year 1 bth ~A~. 1992 · ,; g., S .' City Averale ............. 132.3 '.':~, ' -':~:!y~ (1967=100) ................ 417.2 Los. 'T "' 'Anieles-anahela-~verside.. 145,5 : " ':;. - (1967=1002 ................ 429,8 , i.- ~San~Irancisco-Oakland-San Jose. 141.9 -'-' .-~)!:( 1967=1002 ................. ' 436.4 West'V:', ....................... 141.1 · ':: ( . 977 = 1002 ........ 228.1 IHDBIIS FEB. NAB. 1923 1993 143.1 143.6 428.7 430.1 150.0 149.8 443.3 442.7 145.5 145.7 447.4 448.0 · 145.2 145.2 234.7 234.7 147,2 240,0 1993 1993 3.2 3.1 3,5 3,0 3,2 2,7 3,3 2,9 3,4 2,9 · .. -,:',t-, ,.'o ad..t,a~ lIAR, 1993 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 UBBAN WAGE, XAmMKBS AND CLIRICAr- ll~rren N'a,~,, FIB, 1992 1993 137.0 140.7 408.1 419.2 141.0 145.0 416.6 428.6 139,9 143,5 426,0 436,9 West - A ', .................... 143.O.:.'_ 147.2 · · · · ;:(Dec, 1977- = 1002' , ....... 233.1 ..... 240.1 ...... Weot~---C-., ,.., .-; ,, ,., ,, ~; ~..a~.,....: .. 138.3 ~. "I43. l" '143; 8 ' (Dec, 1277 = 100) ........ 214.5" 221.8 223,0 · ; ": ~!!i,:". . 5is. olassee: I = 1,250,000 and over, B = Hot available ~or West~ C = 60,000 to 330,000, D = ~ . , :-,;~:.;' ~ . .. -:: Release date &prtl 9, 1993. !or ,- ~'Paefflo cltles are as ~ollows: ., Anchorare (907) 271-2770 Bonol~lu (808) 541-2808 186,7 142,7 228,2 229,5 139,0 143.1 225,0 231,6 136.8 141,3 211,0 217,9 1993 141.1 420.4 144.8 ' · 428,0 143,8 ' · 437,8 142,7 229.5 143,0 231,6_ 141.8 218,8 PZ!!CSIiTCHAIIGI Tear 1 ~n~ FIB. BAR. ~R. 1993 1993 1993 3.2 3.0 '0.3 3.3 2.7 -0.1 3,2 2.8 0.2 3.3 2.9 0.0 3.3 2.9 -0,1 '4,2 3,7 0~4 Not available Zor West. ' : a~re ~nformatton ,all (4152 744-6600 or (2132 252-7521, CPI 24 ho~r hotl~ne numbers Zor the ~ ~eles (213) 252-7528 ~ DIdo (619).557-6536 ~attle (206) 553-0645 Po~I~ (503) 326-4132 ~ gructs~ (415) 7~-6605 APPENDIX °A' TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 536.4 SCHEDULE OF WASTE DISPOSAL FEES EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1993 RESOLUTIONI · PARAGRAPH I B 1 2 3 C 1 D 1 E 1 3 WASTE GROUP DESCRIPTIONS Car or stallon wagon or any vehicle hauling 2 or less large trash bags Vans, pickup b'ucks or any vehicle pulling a two-wheel trailer or any other vehicle: (a) hauling miscellaneous waste not exceeding .3 ton (b) .hauling clean green and/or woody wastes which are segregated from other wastes and do not exceed .3 ton (c) hauling miscellaneous waste exceeding .3 ton (d) hauling clean green and/or woody wastes which are segregated from other wastee and e~ceed .3 ton Any vehicle hauling: (a) wastes consisting exclusively of concrete, asphalt. stones and/or some dirt in which no single piece of concrete. asphalt. or stone weighs more than 150 Ibs or is 24' in diameter : · (b) entb'ely clean fill dirt which may be used for daily cover and has ! been preapproved by the Director or designee I Ail veh described in any other provision of this fee Schedule ; icles not Added to the charges listed herein will be a charge of: (a) $1.00 per tire being disposed of with a load of routine refuse (b) $10.00 per uncovered load of refuse which has exposed material in the opinion of the Director may litter access routes to the'landfill ; Vehicles hauling loads of dead animals Vehicles hauling loads of more than 12 motor vehicle and/or standard truck equipment tires and any load with 1 or more oversize tires. used on motor graoers. scrapers. etc. : All other vehicles carrying wastes requiring special handling .i Chemical toilet wastes. grease trap purepings, septic tank or cesspool . ~pumping wastes contained in tanker vehicles ~,Any other acceptable liquid wastes Unloading and towing services, all vehicles: (a) 10 minutes or less (b) over 10 minutes For customers unloading: (a) 16 to 30 minutes past closing (b) 31 minutes or more -.,.. · Per ton (prorated to the nearest $.25) with a minimum charge of $10.00 per vehicle "Per ton (prorated to the nearest $.25) with a minimum charge of $20.00 per vehicle "' Rate is effective at those sites where Director has determined there is an approved outlet established tot clean green and/or woody wastes RATE PER TON or (t?w, N} No Charge S10.00/load $5.00~ load ~ S34.50 ' '$10.00 ~ ; $16.50 ' $5.00/load $34.50 · $44.00 $84.50 $44.00 i $34.50 ' t$44.oo -- I $20.00 $35.00 $10.00 $20.00 I i. I .i . i I SCHEDULE OF RATES July 1, 1992 l~.xhibit 'D*. Schedule ~f Rates Mechanized Single Family Attached Residential Collection, Distx~, Cornposting, and Recycling - Granr~ee Billln5 Monthly Rate: $1_2,~ 1V~ex:hnniTed Single Family Detached Residential Collection, Disposal Cornposting, and Recycling - Parcel Charge ' Monthly Rate: $12.7~ Mechanized Single Family Attached and Det~..hed Residential Additional Re.fuse, Composting, and R~yc. ling Container- Grantee Billing Monthly Per Container Rate: $ ~ Single Family Attached and Detached Re,~ential Additional Bulky Item Pickup - Grantee Billing Pickup Rate: $ 5.17 Commercial, Induslrial, and Multi-Family Rcsidc. nlial ~ Monthly Bin Rates (one 2 cubic yard bin) with following pickups pa wee. lc i x week $ 54.41 5 x week $272.0~ 2 x week $a 6 x week $326.4{~ 3 x week $163.23 7 x week $~..0.,~ 4 x wcck $217,64 Non-conLracw. d 2 Cubic Yard pickup: $~.00 Compacted 2 Cubic Yard pickup: 2.5 X wecldy pickup rate Commercial, Industrial, and Multi-Faraily Residential Refuse Monthly Bin Rates (one 3 cubic yard bin) with following picaraps per week: 1 x week $ 64.41 5 x week 2 x week $~ 6 x week $386.46 3 x week $19_,!,~ 7 x week $450.87 4 x week Non-conWacted 3 Cubic Yard pickup: s30.0 Compacted 3 Cubic Yard pickup: 2.5 X weekly picklip rate Commea~cial, Industrial, and Multi-Family Residential Recyclin. Monthly Bin Rates (one 3 cubic yard bin) with following pickups pear w~elc week S a 5 x week week $ 61.84_ 6 x week week $ 92.76 7 x week $216.44 week $123.68 Non-contracted 3 Cubic Yard pickup: $20.o0 Commercial, Industzial, and Multi-Fay Residential Refuse Monthly Bin Rates (one 4 cubic yard bin) with follo6ang pickups per week ' ' 1 x week $ a 5 x week 2 x week $~118.,._82 6 x week $446.46 3 x we, e.,k $312L1t- 7 x week 4 x week $297.64 Non-contracted 4 Cubic Yard pickup: $.~_._.~ Compacted 4 Cubic Yard pickup: 2.5 X .weekly pickup rate Commercial, Industrial, and Multi-Fay Residential Recycling, Monthly Bin Rates (one 4 cubic yard bin) with following pieImps per week: 1 x week $ 40,92 5 x week $204.60 2 x week $ 31,84 6 x week 3 x week $122.76 7 x week 4 x week $163.6~ Non-contracted 4 Cubic Yard pickup: 10. Temporary 3 Cubic Yard Bin Rate: $54.1O 11. Extra Temporary 3 Cubic Yard Pickup: $30.00 12. Redelivery and Reinstatement Rate: $25.W_ 13. Rolloff Disposal Rate: $134.00 plus landf/iYrecycler fee 14. Rolloff Recycling Rate: $134.00 minus market value 15. Rolloff Compactor Rate: $'268.00 plus landffiYrecyclex fee 16. Rolloff Recycling Compacrnr Rate: $263.00 minus market value 17. *Hard to Senrice' Vehicle Usage Rate: 11o Charge 18. 'Hard to Sen, ic:' Bin Moving 3Ra~: No Char~ 19. Spedal 3Bin Lids (Locking/CBL) Rate: No 20. I)eodotiz~g/Repladng Bin P, at~: No Chax~ 21. Annual Consumer Price Index ('CPI') and Tipping Fee Adjustment. The rates in paragraphs D 1-20 above shall be automatically adjusted to reflect annually and such adjustment shall be effective ~ adjustment shall be made calendar year. The "C1>I adj~ent shall be ~fe first day of July of each (a) the previous rate by Co) the percentage increase or d ultipl..y~ng Index for all urban consumers within the Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riversidt: Metropolitan Areas during the pzior calendar year, e~duding the housing component. The comparison shall be made during March of each year and shall be effective each July 1st. The first Cl>I adjustment shall occur July I, 19~2. The landfill tipping fee adjustment shall be a pro-rata pass through of any tipping fee increase, and shall be effective at the start of the first full billing pewiod after the landfill tipping fee is adjusted. As of the effective date of this Resolution, the landfill tipping fee is $tL,5.0. The fonnul~ for the annual CPI and Landfxll Tipping Fce Adjustments ar~ as follows: (1) C"'PI Formula: (2) Exhibit "D, · paragnphs 1=4: (Ram x 78 ~) x CPI Exh~it 'D,' paragraphs 5-20: (Rate x 71.59~) x CPI Landfal Tipping Fee Formula: (a) $0.21 per $1.00/ton landfill increase limes current published residential recycling (less grcenwaste, s) diversion rate, e.g., S8.00 landfill increase with a 25 % diversion rate would equal; $.21 x 8 --~ $1.68 x 25 ~ _ rate increase. = $.42 $1.68 ---- $1.26 ) .$.0.91 per $1.00/ton landfal increase times nonresidenti recycling diversion rate less greenwastes, concrete, cuffent published and asphalt, e.g., $8.00 landfill increase with a25% divers/on rate would equal: $.Pl x 8 = $'7.28 x 25 ~ = $1.82 - $7.28 = $5.46 rate increase. 22, -ExtraordinasCy Costl. A. In addition to, and not in lien af, the annual CPI increase or decrease described in paragraph D 21, above, Granter: shall a/so be entitled to rate incn:asea or decreases in an mount equal to Orantee's extraordhary increases or decreases in its cost of collection. Such extraordinary cost increases or decreases shah be subject to City Council approval. Since tipping fee adjustments shall be a pro-ram pass through to City, Grantce's material recovery facility or transfer station processing fees, now or later impo,scd, shall neither bc levied on City nor added to the rates in Exhibit 'D.' Such extraordinary hereases or decreases in its cost of collection shall include, by way of example and not by way of limitation: (1) a changc in the location of the landf~ or other hwful disposal sites to which the Grantee is mtttifed to tnnspon solid wast= collccted hereunder; ('2) levied material recovery facility host fees; and (3) changes in thc local, State or l~edcral hws govcming street swce. ping and temporary bin/rolloff services and collection, separation, transpomti~, recycling, comlx>sting' or disposal of solid waste and construction and street dcbrls. B. Services and rates not listed in this F. xh'bit shall be considexcd an unauthorized level of service and rate and shall not bc provided or lcvicd within the City Limits of the City of Tanecula. Such services and proposed xates shall be brought to the attention of thc City Manager or his de.signcc for evaluation and determination to alter the services and rates currently provided. The grandfathered haula (Waste Managcment of Inland Vallcy) is hereby grandfathered to continue to providc thc following serviccs and charge thc corfr. sponding rates as depicted below for thirty (30) existing customers within the City Limits of the City of Tcmccula: Commercial, Industthl, and Multi-Family Residential Re_K_f_f_f_f_f_f_f~ Monthly Bin Rates (onc 1.5 cubic yard bin) with following pickups per week: 1 x week $ .49.41 5 x week $24.7,0_5_ 2 x week $ 98,82 6 x week $2_,O..C~.46 3 x week $14_.8.~ 7 x week $452~.~ 4 x week $1_.97_..~ Non-contracted 1.5 Cubic Yard pickrip: Compacted 1.5 Cubic Yard piak~: 2.5 X weekly pichtp rate Wastc Managcmcnt of Inland Vallay Shall not offer ~c 1.5 cubic yard bin scrvice to any additional customers. As ca~jng 1.5 cubic yard bin customers' contracts expire, they shall not be renewed .offering the 1.5 cubic yard bin sen, ice. Franchised or grandfathcred haulers that ar~ discovcred offering solid wa,stc ~xviccs unauthorized by City shall bc ticrefrained in material breach of thcir respective frdnchisc agreemcnt or solid waste regulations and shall become the baxis for reslx~tivc contract or liccnse damages or termination. Reins 9Z-SS Ze'd ~9~1 ~6 606 HOI~H~H '3 alAea ITEM 5 TO: FROM: DATE: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of PlanZ~~ June 22, 1993 SUBJECT: PA93-0038, a request to convert an existing young adult nightclub into an adult only nightclub which will allow the selling and on-site consumption of alcohol· Prepared by: RECOMMENDATION: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner It is requested that the City Council: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PA93-0038, MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONVERT AN EXISTING TEEN NIGHTCLUB INTO AN ADULT ONLY NIGHTCLUB AND ALLOW THE SELLING AND ON-SITE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL LOCATED AT 28822 FRONT STREET, SUITE 203, PARCEL NUMBER 922-093- 002. BACKGROUND At their April 18, 1993 meeting the Temecula Planning Commission denied the above referenced project· On June 8, 1993, the City Council held a public hearing to hear the applicant's appeal of the Planning Commission.'s decision. At the June 8th meeting, the Council directed staff to return to the June 22, 1993 City Council meeting with a Resolution and Conditions of Approval for this project. FISCAL IMPACT None Attachments: Resolution No. 93-... - Page 2 Conditions of Appr;~val - Page 8 R:\S\STAFFRPT%38PA93-2.CC 6/16/93 klb 1 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 93- R:\S\STAFFRPT~38PA93-2.CC 6/18/93 Idb 2 RESOLIYFION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEM~'IrLA APPROVING PA93-0038, MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONVERT AN EXISTING TEEN NIGHTCLUB INTO AN ADULT ONLY NIGHTCLUB AND ALLOW THE SELLING AND ON-SITE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL LOCATED AT 28822 FRONT STREET, SUITE 203, PARCEL NUMBER 922-093- 002. WHEREAS, Charles Mitich fried PA93-0038, Minor Conditional Use Permit in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Conditional Use Permit application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Conditional Use Permit on April 5, 1993, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHF, REAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission denied said Conditional Use Permit; WHEREAS, the applicant appealed the decision of the Planning Commission to the Temecula City Council. WltRREAS, the City Council considered said Conditional Use Permit on June 8, 1993 at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Council hearing, the Council directed staff to return to the June 22, 1993 meeting'with a Resolution of Approval and Conditions of Approval. NOW, TI~REFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, ff all of the following requirements are met: R:\S\STAFFRPT~38PA93-2.CC 6/16/93 klb ;3 general plan. The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the 2. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: a. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state hw and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed Conditional Use Permit is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: plan. The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general 2. The City Council finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this rifle, each of the following: a. There is reasonable probability that PA93-0038, Minor Conditional Use Permit proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c. The prop6sed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. D. Pursuant to City of Temecuh Ordinance No. 93-05, which declared a moratorium on the establishment of nightclubs without a Conditional Use Permit, the applicant fried the required Conditional Use 'Permit application for the approval of the proposed nightclub. R:\S\STAFFRPT~39PA93-2.CC 6/16/93 klb 4 a. Pursuant to Section 18.28(e), no Conditional Use Permit may be approved unless the applicant demonstrates the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health safety and welfare of the community, and further, that any Conditional Use Permit approved shall be subject to such conditions as shah be necessary to protect the health, safety and general weftaxe of the community. E. The City Council, in approving the proposed Conditional Use Permit, makes the following findings, to wit: 1. There is a reasonable probability that PA93-0038, Minor Conditional Use Permit will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law due to the fact that the project is consistent with existing zoning of General Commercial and the Draft General Plan Land Use designation of Service Commercial. 2. The proposed project is consistent with Ordinance No. 348 since it meets all the requirements of Ordinance No. 348. 3. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or general weftare of the community. The project meets the criteria prescribed under Ordinance No. 348, Section 18.28. In addition, the attached Conditions of Approval will assure adequate circulation, access and parking which will facilitate the proposed use. 4. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area. The project conforms with applicable land use and development regulations. Surrounding development is predominan~y commercial and operate during daytime hours. The proposed use has been conditioned to insure it will not impact the surrounding area businesses. 5. The proposed project will not have a significant impact' on the environment since the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act per Section 15061 Co)(3).. F. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, the Conditional Use Permit proposed is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. Section 2. Environmental Compliance. The proposed use has been determined to be a Class I Categorical Exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 3. Conditions. That the city of Temecula City Council hereby approves PA93- 0038, Minor Conditional Use Permit to convert the existing teen nightclub to an adult only nightclub and allow the selling and on-site consumption of alcohol located at 28822 Front Street, Suite 203, APN 922-093-002, subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto. R:\S\STAFFRPT%38PA93-2.CC 611 6193 klb 5 Seaion 4. Term. The term of said Use Permit shall be two years, until June 22, 1995. Based upon the evidence present~ to the City Council at the public hearing, this period represents a reasonable period of time to amortize the anticipated investment of $100,000.00 into the proposed use. Subsequen~y ,. upon application to the Planning Director and subject to appeal to the Planning Commission and City Council, the Use Permit may be extended for a like two (2) year term. R:\S%STAFFRPT~38PA93-2.CC 6118/93 Idb 6 Section 5. The City Clerk shah certify the adoption of this Resolution. Section 6. PASSED, APPROVEr} AND ADOPTEr} this 22nd day of June, 1993. ATTEST: J. SAL MU OZ MAYOR June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMEC~) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Tem~cula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 22nd day of June, 1993 by the following vote of the City Council: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CO~CILMPMBERS: CO~CILMEMBERS: CO~-MEMBERS: CO~C~ERS: JUNES. GREEK CITY CLERK R:\S\STAFFRP'r'%38pA93,2 .CC 6/16/93 Idb 7 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:~S\STAFFRPT~38PA93-2.CC 6/16/93 klb 8 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PA93-0038, Conditional Use Permit Project Description: A request to convert an existing young adult nightclub into an adult only nightclub which will allow the selling and on-site consumption of alcohol located at 28822 Front Street. Assessor's Parcel No.:922-093-002 PLANNING DEPARTMENT GENERAL REQUIREMENTS The use hereby permitted is for an adult only nightclub to be located in an existing building at 28822 Front Street. e This approval shall be used within one (1) year of approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the one (1) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. Should this use be discontinued for a year or longer, the permit will be deemed null and void. The applicant shall provide written notification of the opening date as an adult nightclub to the Director of Planning and the Temecula Police Department fourteen (14) days prior to said opening· In the event that complaints are received relative to the operation of the facility, upon the recommendation of the Planning Director and the Police Chief, (e.g. noise, trash, alcohol related arrests) the matter will then be scheduled before the Planning Commission for consideration of revocation of this Conditional Use Permit. If multiple and/or constant problems arise at the establishment which adversely impact the Police Department; the Police Department can at the discretion of the Police Chief assign officers to work at the establishment. The number of officers assigned, the hours and days worked is also at the discretion of the Police Chief. Any officers so assigned will be at the current extra duty rate of pay and will be paid for by the owner of the establishment. e Hours of operation shall be limited to between 5:00 pm and 2:00 am Monday through Sunday. The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims, actions, or proceedings against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or R:\S\STAFFRPT~38PA93-2.CC 6/16/93 klb 9 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. legislative body concerning Planning Application No. PA93-0038, Conditional Use Permit. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. This conditional use permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 18.31 of Ordinance 348. The development of the premises shall conform substantially with the site plan marked Exhibit "A", or as amended by these conditions. A minimum of 31 parking spaces shall be provided for the use in accordance with Section 18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. A minimum of I handicapped parking space shall be provided. The location of the handicapped parking spaces shall be approved by the Planning Director. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at or by telephone In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking space shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size. The permittee shall obtain a revised permit for any modifications or revisions to the approval hereby granted pursuant to Section 18.43 of Ordinance No. 348. Permittee shall develop and utilize a single file queue mechanism at the outside entrance. Exterior noise levels shall not exceed 65 decibels as measured 50 feet from the property line. Applicant shall bear the cost of a noise study if noise level reading is requested as a result of a complaint to the City. An Administrative Plot Plan application and accompanying fee for signage and lighting shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. R:~S\STAFFRPT~38PA93-2.CC 6/18193 Idb 10 16. Music shall be discontinued by 1:30 a.m. Alcoholic beverage sales shall cease after 1:00 a.m. 17. Permittee shall consider loiterers as trespassers and request that they leave. Police shall be notified immediately if they refuse to leave. 18. The permittee shall notify and obtain approval from the City Planning Department 30 days in advance of conducting any special event (Holiday, Seasonal, e.g.). All City costs incurred as a result of a special event, will be paid for by the permittee. All special events will be conducted in compliance with the City's special event regulations. 19. Any disturbance at the site will be reported immediately to the Temecula Police Department. 20. Exterior lighting shall be the maximum permitted under Palomar Lighting District standards. 21. The interior lighting shall be sufficient for a police officer or employee to identify any person inside the business. 22. This permit commences when the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control issues the license to sell alcoholic beverages. WITHIN FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT 23. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Twenty-Five Dollars (925.00) for the filing of the Notice of Determination with the Riverside County Clerk. BUILDING AND SAFETY 24. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1991 edition of the Uniform Building, Plumbing and Mechanical; 1990 National Electrical Code; California · Administrative Code Title 24 Energy and Handicapped Regulations and the Temecula Code. 25. Prior to the commencement of any construction work, obtain all building plan and permit approvals. 26. Restroom fixtures, number and type, shall be in accordance with the provisions of the 1991 edition of the uniform plumbing code, Appendix C. TEMECULA POLICE DEPARTMENT 27. Any additional landscaping will required the approval of the City of Temecula Director of Planning and the Temecula Police Department. 28. Maintain adequate number "high visibility" in house security trained in recognizing, averting, and reporting potential problems within establishment during operating hours. R:\S~STAFFRPT~38PA93-2.CC 6/16/93 klb 11 29. Provide constant security personnel in parking lot area during peak business hours, (after sunset). 30. Post "No Loitering, signs in conspicuous areas of parking lot and make effort to discourage loitering outside establishment. 31. Have only one entrance and one exit available to general public, except for emergency exits. These doors must be secured by personnel during all hours of operation. All other access doors shall be alarmed when opened. 32. No one under 21 years of age will be permitted in the establishment. 33. Establishment shall have a designated driver program in effect. Police Department can be contacted for suggestions, if desired. OTHER AGENCIES 34. Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the appropriate section of Ordinance No. 546 and the County Fire Warden's transmittal dated March 18, 1993, a copy of which is attached. 35. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Health Department transmittal dated March 9, 1993, a copy of which is attached. 36. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated March 10, 1993, a copy of which is attached. 37. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Temecula Police Department's transmittal dated March 30, 1993, a copy of which is attached. 38. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. R:\S\STAFFRP"r~38PA93-2.CC 6/16/93 klb 12 ITEM NO. 6 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council Scott F. Field City Attorney June 22, 1993 Item No. 6 - RDA Assistance - WalMart RECOMMENDATION: Negotiations with Kernper Real Estate and WalMart are currently ongoing and it is requested this public hearing be continued to the meeting of July 13, 1993. sj ITEM NO. 7 APPROVAT. CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council Mary Jane McLarney Finance Officer June 22, 1993 Item No. 7 - Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 1994-98 City Clerk June S. Greek RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE CAPITAL PROGRAM AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEARS 1994-98 THE CITY OF IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT BACKGROUND: The staff will finalize a staff report on this item and forward it to you under separate cover. JSG APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer DATE: June 22,1993 SUBJECT: Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 1994-98 Prepared By: Grant M. Yates, Financial Services Administrator RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEARS 1994-98. DISCUSSION: Staff has updated the five year Capital Improvement Program for the Fiscal Years 1994-98 with the major additions and deletions as follows: New Projects in FY 1994-98 CIP Project Description Funding Sources Priority Amount Felix Valdez Jefferson Avenue Storm Drain John Warner Road Kent A. Hintergardt Memorial Park Liefer Road Margarita Road (3 segments) Margarita Road, Rancho California Road to La Serena Way Margarita Road Sidewalk Project Nicolas Road Improvements Opticon Signal Pala Road Bridge Pauba Road Improvements RDA I ,~ 312,500 Measure A I 60,000 Service Level R I 250,000 DIF II 150,000 Service Level R I 410,000 DIF III 4,200,000 DIF I 262,500 SB821/DIF I 31,000 Measure A II 700,000 RDA I 60,000 Undetermined I 7,400,000 DIF II 1,320,000 New Projects in FY 1994-98 CIP (Continued) Project Description Funding Sources Priority Pauba Road Fire Station RDA III Pujol Street Improvements CDBG I Rancho Vista Sidewalks Project SB821/DIF I Santiago Road Assessment District IV Traffic Signals at: DIF I Avenida Barca/Margarita Diaz Interconnect Winchester Road/I-15 Right Turn Lane I Amount 1,900,000 100,000 22,500 2, 100,000 Various Measure A 75,000 Project3 Com01eted or Deleted From Fiscal Years 1993-97 Project Description Bike Paths (Interim) Convention Lake/Dam Murrieta Creek Margarita Road (Interim) Murrieta Creek Improvements Old Town Specific Plan Old Town Street Repairs Shopping Center/Mall Sixth Street Paving Western Bypass Study Funding Sources Completed/ Priority Deleted Amount SB 821/Measure A III C $ 50,000 Undetermined IV D 25,000,000 Undetermined IV D N/A Measure A I C 750,000 Undetermined IV D 15,400,000 RDA/CDBG I C 125,000 RDA I D 200,000 Sales Tax IV D 5,000,000 DIF I C 70,000 CDBG I C 19,800 The Fiscal Year 1994-98 CIP was updated based upon City Council's direction and on the input received during the workshop conducted on Monday, April 19, 1993. Attachments: Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 1994-98 Legend: C D DIF TSM CDBG RDA SB821 Completed Deleted Development Impact Fees Traffic Signal Mitigation Fees Community Development Block Grant Redevelopment Agency Senate Bill 821 RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPRO~ PROGRAM AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FY 1993-94 W!:[F~REAS, the City of Temecula requires public infrastructure improvements in the areas of streets, highways, transportation facilities, parks, recreational facilities and public buildings and facilities; and WHEREAS, the careful timing of the installation of such improvements is necessary so as to best serve the public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS, in order to prrioritized these public infrastructure and improvements, Capital Improvements Program is necessary; NOW, TFIEREFO RE, ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS .FOLLOWS: Section 1. The 1994-98 Capital Improvement Program is hereby approved. A copy of the 1994-98 Program is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and will be kept on file in the office of the City Clerk. Section 2. Adoption of this Program is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA'). Pursuant to Section 15262 of the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, a project involving only feasibility or planning studies for possible future actions, which actions the City Council has not approved, adopted or funded, does not require preparation of an EIR or Negative Declaration, but does require consideration of environmental factors. In reviewing this Program and conducting public hearings on it, the City Council has considered relevant environmental factors. Section 3. That certain document now on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Temecula entitled "City of Temecnla 1994-98 Capital Improvement Program included herein · appropriations for FY 1993-94 is hereby adopted. Section 4. That the following controls axe hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget appropriations: A. No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered appropriation available to cover the expenditure. B. The City Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to $10,000. Any expenditure of funds in excess of $10,000 requires City Council action. C. The City Manager may approve change orders on Public Works contracts in amounts up to $10,000, if sufficient appropriated funds are available. Section $. Certification The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1993. ATTEST: J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 93- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , 1993 by the following roll call vote. AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCILMI~MBERS: None COUNCILMEMBERS: None June S. Greek, City Clerk > Z 0 0 0 .: t~c:: > > . ....... ~0 0~ 0 ~0 0~ nO O~ 0 0 >0 > 0 0 i. >O ,, : . : .Z O0 Jimink mm 0 8 r" ~ 0 \X\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'\\\\\\\\\\x ~ ~ 0 ! "0 0 0 0::0 o ~ ~ z ! I I 0 ~3 0 0 0 0 I 0 -g O0 ~-~ ~ mO 0 0 O 0 i 0 BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD >0 0 0 > > 0 0 . I 0 BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD OAD 0 0 L"fj 0 C) 0 Z I I O 0 o ~ c_ % m % F" 0 0 Z C) > > 0 0 I 0 C) I 0 Z I 0 I 0 > Z 0 · Z ~ m \ ~ . ! OAD 0 / / 0 0 o r'n \ d O O~. O Z O \ 0 · I I ITEM NO. 8 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer DATE: June 22, 1993 SUBJECT: Proposed Fiscal Year 1993-94 Annual Operating Budget Prepared By: Grant M. Yates, Financial Services Administrator RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Review the proposed annual Operating Budget for the Fiscal Year 1993-94, make adjustments if desired. 2. Adopt Resolution 93- entitled: RESOLUTION 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING THE OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE VARIOUS DEPARTMENT BUDGETS. 3. Adopt Resolution No. 93- entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS DISCUSSION: Staff is proud to present the Fiscal Year 1993-94 Proposed Operating Budget. The FY 1993-94 budget is projecting general fund revenues of $12,930,146 with proposed expenditures and other uses of $12,724,118. This proposed expenditure level leaves a margin of $206,028 between projected general fund revenues and projected expenditures and other uses. The City Council has identified an objective of developing and maintaining a reserve for economic uncertainties of 10% or $1,272,412 in Fiscal Year 1993-94. In addition to the 10% reserve for economic uncertainties, undesignated unreserved fund balance at June 30, 1993 is projected to be $2,684,632 or approximately 20% of the general fund budget. REVENUE Revenue in the General Fund excluding the new revenue sources of Structural Fire Tax and Fire Plan Check Inspection Fees, is projected to decrease by $312,638 or 2.7% from Fiscal Year 1992-93 levels. This decrease is attributable to a 23% reduction in property tax revenue, projected from State budget cuts, and decreases in Engineering Plan Check and Inspection Fees, attributable to the condition of the local economy. The City has withdrawn from the County's Fire Tax District therefore, all gross revenues and expenditures are reflected in this budget. Prior to the FY 1993-94, the tax was collected by the County of Riverside and offset the County's invoice for contract Fire Services. Revenue for Structural Fire Tax is estimated at $1,373,1 79 in FY 1993-94. In addition, the City will also be taking over from the County Fire Plan Check and Inspection Services and is estimating this revenue at $70,000 in FY 1993- 94. Finally, Sales Tax revenue is projected to increase from $5,300,000 to $5,600,000 which ranks the City as having one of the highest sales tax bases per capita in the region. EXPENDITURES The proposed budget includes one additional Internal Service Fund set up to charge operating departments for the rent and related costs associated with City Hall. This addition brings the number of Internal Service Funds to five including Insurance, Vehicles, Information Systems and the Copy Center. There are five new positions proposed in the budget including: Position Title Department/ Funding Source Assistant Engineer Office Assistant Custodian Public Works Public Works Facilities Internal Service Fund Lead Maintenance Worker Maintenance Worker Service Level A Service Level A ResOonsibilities Clerical Assistance Maintain City Hall, CRC & Senior Center Graffiti Removal Street Stenciling Positions that are authorized but not funded in Fiscal Year 1993-94: Position Title Department/ Funding Source Resoonsibilities Police Officer Fire Captain Senior Management Analyst Senior Building Inspector Police Fire City Manager Building & Safety Patrol Fire Prevention Contracts Inspections The Fiscal Year 1993-94 Proposed Budget is a conservative, balanced budget, developed in consideration of the City Council's priorities. This proposed budget will provide for the same service level as in previous years while effectively utilizing all resources currently available. The Fiscal Year 1993-94 Proposed Budget was developed taking into consideration the current state of the economy and the economic uncertainty in the upcoming fiscal year. The result is a budget that will enable the City to provide quality programs and services to the citizens of the City of Temecula. Staff looks forward to presenting this to you and answering any questions or concerns that you might have. Attachments: Proposed Fiscal Year 1993-94 Annual Operating Budget Resolution No. 93- Operating Budget to adopt Fiscal Year 1993-94 Annual Resolution No. 93- Positions Revising the Schedule of Authorized Exhibit "A" Schedule of Authorized Positions RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF TH'F~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 FOR THE CITY OF T'ElVIECULA AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE VARIOUS DEPARTMENT BUDGETS. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula has reviewed the proposed final Operating Budget for fiscal year 1993-94 and has held such public meetings as are necessary prior to adoption of the final Operating Budget, and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That certain document now on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Temecula entitled "City of Temecula 1993-94 Annual Budget," is hereby adopted. SECTION 2. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget appropriations: A. No expenditure of funds shah be made unless there is an unencumbered appropriation available to cover the expenditure. B. The Department Head may prepare a transfer of appropriations within departmental budget accounts up to $10,000 per transfer, with the approval of the City Manager. C. The City Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to $10,000. Any expenditure of funds in excess of $10,000 requires City Council action. D. The City Council must authorize transfers of funds from the Unreserved Fund Balance and transfers within departmental budget accounts of $10,000 or .more. E. The City Council must authorize any increase in regular personnel positions above the level included in the final budget. The City Manager may authorize the hiring of temporary or part time staff as necessary within the limits imposed by the controls listed above. F. Notwithstanding Section 2C, pursuant to Section 3.13,080 of the Municipal Code, the City Manager may authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditures of Public Works funds in excess of $25,000 require City Council action, except that the City Manager may approve change orders on Public Works contracts approved by the Council in amounts up to project contingency established by the Council. Resos~315 SECTION 3. Outstanding encumbrances shown on the City books at June 30, 1992, are hereby appropriated for such contracts or obligations for 1993-94. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify adoption of the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 22nd day of June, 1993. J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 93- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 22nd day of June 1993 by the following roll call vote. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 93-- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIzF, r} POSITIONS WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority under Chapter 2.08.060 of the City's Municipal Code, the City Manager has the authority to hire, set salaries and adopt personnel policies; and, WHEREAS, the City Manager has recommended and the City Council now wishes to adopt the Revised Schedule of Authorized Positions; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVF~, by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. The attached Schedule of Authorized Positions (Exhibit A) is hereby adopted pursuant to Section 45001 of the California Government Code. Such list is attached to this Resolution and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. The Schedule of Authorized Positions shall become effective July 1, 1993, and may be thereafter mended. Section 3. The City Manager shall implement the attached Schedule of Authorized Positions and has the authority to select and appoint employees in accordance with the City's personnel policies. Section 4. All prior resolutions and parts of this resolution in conflict with this Resolution are hereby rescinded. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOFrED by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of June, 1993. J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor ATI'EST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] ~ mB 15 -1- STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) CITY OF TEMBCULA ) SS I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 93- was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, he~ on the 22nd day of June, 1993, by the following vote of the Council: AYF, S: C OUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS EXHIBIT A AUTHORIZED POSITION TITLES POSITIONS MINIMUM Accounting Assistant .5 $1,454 Accounting Specialist 3 $1,920 Accountant 0 $2,498 Administrative Secretary 6 $1,872 Administrative TeChnician 1 $1,394 Assistant City Manager 1 $5,763 Assistant Engineer 3 $3,047 Assistant Manner 2 $2,464 Associate Engineer 2 $3,260 Associate Manner 2 $3,047 Building Inspector I I $2,237 Building Inspector II 2 $2,431 Building Technician 2 $2,193 Cashier I $1,454 Chief Accountant 1 $3,377 Chief Building Official 1 $5,236 City Clerk I $4,355 City Engineer/Dir. of Public Works I $5,763 City Manager 1 * ' * * * * Code Enforcement Officer 1 $2,347 Councilmember 5 $ 300 Custodian I $1,527 Deputy City Clerk I $2,414 Development Assistant 1 $2,193 Director of Community Services 1 $5.236 Director of Manning 1 $5.236 Engineering Aide 1 $1,920 Engineering Technician 2 $2,105 Executive Assistant I $2,414 Finance Officer I $5,236 Financial Services Administrator I $3,377 Human Resources Administrator 1 $3,377 Landscape Technician 1 $1,926 Lead Maintenance Worker 2 $1,926 Maintenance Superintendent 2 $3,331 Maintenance Worker 5 $1,667 Management Analyst 0 $2,748 Office Assistant 11 $1,394 Office Specialist 2.5 $1,454 Permit Engineer I $3,260 Personnel Specialist 2 $1,920 Manning Technician 3 $2,193 Principal Engineer 2 $4,060 Public Works Inspector 2 $2,431 Recreation Coordinator 2 $1,566 Recreation Superintendent I $3,331 Recreation Supervisor 2 $2,019 Senior Accountant I $3,047 Senior Building Inspector 2 $2,943 Senior Management Analyst 2 $3,088 Senior Banner 2 $3,424 Senior Public Works Inspector 2 $2,943 Street Supervisor 0 $2,498 Systems Analyst 1 $2,748 Traffic Engineer 1 $4,060 Traffic Technician I $2,105 Volunteer Coordinator 1_ $1,454 TOTAL 101.0 MAXIMUM $1,813 $2,395 $3,116 $2,335 $1,739 $7,188 $3,800 $3,073 $4,066 $3,800 $2,790 $3,032 $2,735 $1,813 $4,212 $6.530 $5,432 $7,188 $8,655 $2,927 $ 300 $1,905 $3,011 $2 735 $6 530 $6 530 $2.395 $2 625 $3 011 $6 530 $4 212 $4.212 $2,402 $2,402 $4,155 $2,079 $3,427 $1,739 $1,813 $4,066 $2,395 $2,735 $5,063 $3,032 $1,954 $4,155 $2,518 $3,800 $3 670 $3 851 $4.270 $3.670 $3.116 $3 427 $5 063 $2 625 $1,813 ~ANGE 1004 1028 2006 1026 1000 4024 2024 2004 2032 2024 1044 2002 1042 1004 3002 4016 4000 4024 5000 1048 6000 1008 2000 1042 4016 4016 .1028 1038 2000 4016 3002 3002 1030 1030 3000 1016 2014 1000 1004 2032 1028 1042 3014 2002 1010 3000 1034 2024 2020 2026 3004 2020 2006 2014 3014 1038 1004 EXEMPT/ NON/EXEMPT NE NE NE NE NE E NE NE E NE NE NE NE NE E E E E E NE E NE E NE E E NE NE E E E E NE NE E NE E NE NE E NE NE E NE' NE E NE E NE E E NE NE E E NE NE Effe~ive July 1, 1993 CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA Proposed Operating Budget Fiscal Year 1993-94 CITY COUNCIL J. Sal Mufioz, Mayor Ronald H. Roberts, Mayor Pro Tern Patricia H. Birdsall, Councilmember Ronald J. Parks, Councilmember Jeffrey E. Stone, Councilmember CITY MANAGER David F. Dixon ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER Harwood T. Edvalson Prepared by the Finance Department Mary Jane McLamey, Finance Officer TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Budget Message ............................................. 1 City Seal ................................................ 8 Mission Statement .................................... . ........ 9 Distinguished Budget Presentation Award 10 California Society Municipal Finance Officers Award Directory .......................... ". ................... 11 13 Budget Process .............................................14 Gann Appropriations Limit .....................................16 Understanding the Budget Document ............................... 17 Community Profile .......................................... 18 Budget Graphics and Summaries Overview General Fund Revenues .......................................20 General Fund Revenues by Source .................................21 Revenues by Source - City .....................................22 Revenues by Source - City - Three Year Comparison .....................23 Revenues by Source - Community Services District Three Year Comparison . . . Expenditures by Department- City':::::::::: ......................24 ...................... 25 Expenditure Summary by Department ...............................26 Expenditure Summary by Department o Three Year Comparison .............. 27 Changes in Fund Balance by Fund Proposed Positions by Department ................................. 33 ................................. 36 Summary of Authorized Positions by Department ........................ 37 Personnel Allocation by Department · · ................................ 38 Operating Budget Operating Budget Overview ................................ ..... 43 City Council .............. . ........................ . ........ 44 City Manager City Attorney .............................................. 46 City Clerk ............................. : ................ 54 Finance ................................................ 56 ====================================================== 6o Planning ............................................... 68 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Operating Budget (Continued) ~ Building and Safety .......................................... 74 Engineering ............................................... 80 Police Services ............................................. 84 Fire Services .... Animal Control .......................................... 89 Public Works ............................................ 93 .............................................. 97 Community Services District ..... 103 City Wide ..... ' .............................. Service Level A ........................................ 106 ......................................... 107 Service Level B .......................................... 108 Service Level C ......................................... 109 Service Level D .......................................... 110 Internal Service Funds Facilities .............................................. 111 Insurance ............................................. 112 Vehicles ......................113 Information Systems ....................................... 114 Copy Center ........................................... 115 Redevelopment Agency Low/Moderate Income Housing ................................ 117 Debt Service ........................................... 118 Community Development Block Grant .............................. 121 Budget Reference Material Glossary of Terms ...........................................123 Description of Funds .........................................125 Summary of Accounting Principles .................................127 Description of Major Revenue Sources .............................. 128 Explanation of Major Revenue Sources .............................. 129 INTRODUCTION June 22, 1993 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: I am pleased to submit the proposed Operating Budget for the Fiscal Year 1993-94. This document was developed to serve as not only a monetary statement of programs and policies, but as a document that reflects the many goals, programs, and service priorities that the City of Temecula is committed to providing the citizens of Temecula. The 1993-94 Fiscal Year Openling Budget has been developed after a considerable review process. Department Heads were asked to review the Mission Statement, Goals, and Objectives developed by the City Council, and to submit budget requests that reflected the City Council's direction. Departmental budget submittals were reviewed line-item by line-item in consideration with projected revenues. The result is this document, a conservative, balanced budget that provides for quality services while effectively utilizing available resources. REVENUES Fiscal Year 1993-94 Operating Revenues, including General Fund and Gas Tax and excluding the Temecula Community Services District and Redevelopment Agency are projected to total $13,497,504. This revenue estimate includes two revenue sources not reflected in previous budgets. These two additional revenue sources include the Structural Fire Tax estimated at $1,373,179 and Fire Plan Check and Inspection revenue estimated at $70,000. The Structural Fire Tax is a County property tax and is being reflected in this years document because the City is withdrawing from the County fire district, therefore all gross revenues and expenditures will be reflected in the Operating Budget. The Fire Tax iS a per parcel charge levied on the assessor's parcel roll to pay for Fire Protection Services. The second new revenue source is Fire Plan Check and Inspection revenue. Beginning on July 1, 1993 the City will be taking over this service from the County as budget cuts resulted in the closure of the County's Temecula branch office. This closure has forced unacceptable delays in the processing of Fire Plan Checks, therefore the City wffi be responsible for providing this service and collecting all revenue, estimated at $70,000 generated from the delivery of this service. The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council June 22, 1993 Comparing Fiscal Year 1993-94 revenue estimates with Fiscal Year 1992-93, excluding the Structural Fire Tax and Fire Plan Check and Inspection Revenue, the City has experienced a decrease in revenue of $312,638 or 2.7%. This decrease is directly attributable to State budget cuts and the condition of the local economy. The following graphic details the components that make up the City's General Fund revenues: 1993-94 Projected General Fuad Revenues (Value in Millions) Taxes $9.05 ~!."' ~'~ Subventions $1.07 Other Licenses & Services $0.84 $1.94 Major Changes in Revenue Sales and Use Tax: This revenue source is projected to increase from $5,300,00 in FY 1992-93 to $5,600,000 in FY 1993-94 as a result of increases in City-wide sales. The property owners of CFD 88-12 are required to pay the debt service on bonds which were sold to widen Ynez Road and construct other improvements in the project area. The City, as part of the agreement, will reimburse 25 % of the City's share 'of the sales tax revenue to the property owners. This reimbursement is included in the Non-departmental budget. The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council June 22, 1993 Franchise Fees: This revenue source is anticipated to grow from $660,000 to $680,000 due to an increase in population. The City has franchise agreements with Southern California Edison, Inland Valley Cablevision, Zones Cable Television, and Temecula Environmental Waste Management Company. Property Tax: This revenue source will again be reduced by the State. The State reduc~l the City's revenue by 9% in FY 1992-93 and we are anticipating that the State will reduce the City's property tax revenue by an additional 23 % in FY 1993-94. For further discussion of the impact of the State's legislative actions see Impact of Legislation on Budget, Page 5. Structural F'tre Tax: This revenue is a Component of Property Tax and is estimated at $1,373,179 in FY 1993-94. Prior to FY 1993-94 the tax was collected by the County of Riverside and offset against the County's invoie~ for contract fire services. Motor Vehicle in Lieu: This State subvention will increas~ by $2,630 to an adjusted total of $1,061,026 in FY 1993-94. Motor Vehicle in Lieu fees are calculated annually by the State on a per capita basis. Local Transportation l~unds: As in FY 1992-93, this funding source will not be available as revenue to the City. All funds allocated to the City will be used to pay for the Riverside Transit Authority (RTA) bus service. Investment Interest: This revenue is anticipated to decrease from $300,000 to $275,000 primarily due to lower returns on investments. Licenses, Permits and Service Charges: A decrease of $330,000 is projected in FY 1993-94 in combined Planning, Building, and Engineering services. This decrease is directly attributable to the Engineering Department and decreases in plan check and inspection fees. In addition, the City will be taking over Fire Plan Check and Inspection Services from the County. This will result in the City receiving $70,000 in revenue. F'mes and Forfeitures: This revenue source isprojected to remain constant at $54,000 resulting from an artificial cap established by the State. Community Services District Assessments: This revenue source is obtained by a parcel charge and is directly related to program and service levels approved for the coming fiscal year. EXPENDITURES The total General Fund and Public Works Operating Expenditures are proposed to be $13,556,476 in the Fiscal Year 1993-94. This proposed expenditure level leaves a margin in the General Fund of $206,028 between projected revenues and proposed expenditures. 3 The Honorable Mayor and Mereben of the City Council June 2.2, 1993 The following graphic includes a breakdown of expenditures by function: 1993-94 General Fund Budget by Function Public Safety 44% Maintenance 10% Administration 17% Other 3% Development 26% The proposed Fiscal Year 1993-94 Operating Budget is a hold the line budget that does not reduce the level of service to the community. This budget was constructed with the understanding that the departments will be striving to do more with less. The following is a summary of some of the new programs and/or changes in the FY 1993-94 Operating Budget: A Facilities Intemai Service Fund has been developed to charge the departments for rent and other costs associated with the operation of City Hall. In addition, one position, a custodian, has been funded for nine months of the fiscal year. This position will be responsible for maintaining City Hall, Senior Center, and Community Recreation Center. Staff did an analysis and determined that the cost of one employee was less than contracting with a company to maintain all three facilities. The Non-Departmental budget includes $430,000 to Pay for sales tax reimbursements for Costco and property owners of the CFD 88-12. The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: June 22, 1993 Personnel in Public Works and Engineering were transferred between these respective departments to more accurately reflect the work they are performing in relation to the appropriate departments. In addition, one Office Assistant position is requested and is proposed to be split between Public Works and Engineering. One Assistant Engineer is proposed to work on Park Development. This position will be funded by TCSD. Two new employees are proposed in Community Services District, Service Level A to perform graffiti removal services and street stenciling. The classification titles of these new positions are Lead Maintenance Worker and Maintenance Worker. Several authorized positions were unfunded in the FY 1993-94 Budget including, one officer in the Police Department, one Fire Captain in the Fire Department, a Senior Management Analyst in the City Manager's Office, and a Senior Building Inspector in Building and Safety. Other changes in Personnel include downgrading the Development Services Administrator classification in Community Services District to Senior Management Analyst. IMPACT OF LEGISLATION ON BUDGET The condition of the economy continues to place a significant burden on the City's budget. The State of California is facing severe budget shortfalls and there is a high probability that the State could further impact the City's revenue stream. In FY 1992-93 the City lost a total of $665,000, $90,000 out of property tax, and $575,000 from Redevelopment Agency (RDA). The League of California Cities is actively lobbying to ensure that Cities do not become in jeopardy of losing any other revenues to the State. However, staff is prepared to make the necessary expenditure reductions if and when the State does take further actions. The City Council has identified an objective of developing and maintaining a reserve for economic uncertainties and contingencies of 10% of the General Fund budget. This reserVe will amount to $1,272,412 in Fiscal Year 1993-94. Undesignated, unreserved fund balance at the close of FY 1993-94 is projected to be $2,684,632. COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT The Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) provides parks, recreation, landscape, lighting, and slope maintenance services within the City of Temecula. Oversight responsibility rests with the City Council who serves as the TCSD's Board of Directors. All services are funded by fees charged on the assessor~s parcel roll. The proposed budget for TCSD amounts to $5,000,074. The budget includes operating and maintenance costs for a full year of operation for the Senior Center and three-quarters of a year for the new Community Recreation Center. The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council June 2:2, 1993 I~q~BEVELOPM~NT AGENCY On April 7, 1991 the City Council approved ordinances which adopted the Redevelopmerit Plan for Temecula, This action established the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) and assumed responsibility for the plan effective July 1, 1991. The tax increment revenue in the RDA Debt Service is projected to be $1,956,487 in Fiscal Year 1993-94, This amount includes monies for low and moderate income housing set aside, administrative costs, debt service, and redevelopment projects. The RDA issued over 17 million dollars worth of bonds in FY 1992-93 and the debt service on this issue is $1,447,408 on an annual basis. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The City's Five Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) will be presented to City Council under a separate cover. The impact of developing capital projects on the maintenance and operating costs were taken into consideration as the operating budget was developed. CASH MANAGE1VrF~NT In accordance with Government Code Sections 53601 through 53659, the City of Temecula annually adopts an investment policy identifying the rules and policies that apply to investment instruments that maybe used in investing idle cash. Temecula's investment policy is adopted in March of each year, and follows the objectives of maintaining safety, liquidity, and yield (in that order of priority). All investments are made in compliance with the Government Code and the Investment Policy. DEBT S.F-,RVICE In March of 1993, the City sold over five million dollars of Certificates Of Participation (COP) to finance the construction of the Community Recreation Center (CRC). The City also sold over seventeen million dollars of bonds in the RDA for various projects that are detailed in the CIP. ' Debt service on these bonds are included in the TCSD and RDA budgets respectively. CONCLUSION The Fiscal Year 1993-94 Operating Budget is balanced and provides for increased sentices to the citizens of Temecula. This budget was constructed by utilizing a conservative approach in calculating revenues and corresponding expenditures. This conservative approach is necessary because the City will continue to be sensitive to the conditions of the State and local economy. In addition, we will be keeping a close eye on the State and if the final State Budget includes additional cuts or if local conditions change and negatively impact the projected revenue stream, then staff will return to the Council prepared to make the appropriate adjustments. The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council June 22, 1993 Finally, I would like_ to thank all of the Department Heads, their staff, and the City Council for all of the assistance and support that was exhibited during this year's budget pro~ess. Also, I would liice to thank Community Volunteer, Steven Dangleis for his assistance in creating the graphics included in this document. Sincerely, David F. Dixon City Manager NEW __ 8 City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590 (714) 694-1989 · Fax (714) 694-1999 MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the City of Temecula is to maintain a safe, secure, clean, healthy, and orderly community; to balance the utilization of open space, parks, trail facilities, quality jobs, public transportation, diverse housing, and adequate infrastructure; and to enhance and revitalize historic areas. The City will encourage programs for all age groups, utilize its human resources, and preserve its natural resources while stimulating technology, promoting commerce, and utilizing sound fiscal policy. It is the City Council 's resolve that this mission will instill a sense of pride and accomplishment in its citizens and that the City will be known as progressive, innovative, balanced and environmentally sensitive community. The Government Finance Officen Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) presented an award for Distinguished Budget Presentation to the City of Temecula for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1992. In order to receive this award, a governmental unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, as an operations guide, as a financial plan and as a communication device. The award is ~alid for a period of one year only. We believe our current budget continues to conform to program requirements, and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another award. GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSO Distinguished Budget Presen ta tion PRESENTED TO City of Temecula, California For the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 1992 resi en xecu ive irec or 10 ,¼ 11 DIRECTORY Management ,qtaff City Manager Assistant City Manager City Clerk City Al~mey Director of Planning Chief Building Official Director of Public Works Chief of Police Fire CMef Director of Community Services David F. Dixon Harwood T. Edvalson June S. Greek Scott F. Field Mary Jane McLarney Gary Thornhill Anthony Elmo Tim D. Serlet Rick Sayre Jim Wright Shawn D. Nelson r)epartment of Finance Finance Officer Chief Accountant Financial Services Administrator Senior Accountant Accounting Specialist Accounting Specialist Accounting Specialist Accounting Assistant Cashier Office Assistant Administrative Secretary Mary Jane McLarney Genie Roberrs Grant M. Yates Ca_role Serfiing Joanne Kirchgassner Karma McIntyre Reta Weston Barbara Smith Zenaida Smith Alicia Thorsbome Anita J. Pyle 12 ORGANIZATIONAL CHART Citizens Of Temecula City Council City Attorney Community Services - Landscape Services - Park Planning & Development - Recreation Services - City - Planning Clerk - Finance - Human Resources - Animal Control - Building & - Fire Safety Services - Engineering - Police Services - Public Works 13 BUDGET PROCESS The development of the operating budget began in February with the annual operating budget instruction. The purpose of the budget instruction is to outline policies and procedures used in preparing the 1993-94 Operating Budget and to ensure the budget is prepared in accordance with the fiscal policies and guidelines established by the City Council. The projected time frames provided in this instruction reflected early involvement of City staff and City Council in review and discussion of policies and services guidelines, with concurrent development of financial projections, objectives, and requirements at the staff level. With this approach, the policies, service guidelines, and priorities which guide budget preparation are incorporated into the proposed budget prior to formal submission to the City Council. Several days following the distribution of the operating budget instruction, the first budget workshop was convened. All Department Heads and other key City staff members attended and participated in the review of the instruction. Clearly defined budget requirements and time sensitive budget document objectives were discussed, ensuring complete and accurate understanding by all. For purposes of budget preparation and formulation, departmental budget submittals consistai of two parts: an initial departmental request and a final departmental request. The department's initial request detailed by line item the fiscal requirements requested to carry on the services at current levels, adjusting both recurring and new expenses only for standard cost increases. Such requirements provide for the following: 1. Significant expenditures and staffing changes 2. Contracted services and supplies which are both new and recurring 3. Purchase of new equipment 4. Outlays for minor improvements and facility repairs 5. All special project expenses and one-time expenses 6. Travel, conference, and education expenses Between the time of the initial and final departmental budget request, an analysis was completed for each department. Meetings were 'conducted with the City Manager for oral briefings and discussions of requested expenditures in support of service levels and budget policy guidance. Following the line item analysis of each proposed expenditure the Department Heads prepared an adjusted or final request for additional review and study. 14 BUDGET PROCESS (Continue, d) The review of budget requests also included comparison of historical and current spending levels. The evaluation and final recommendation involved assigning relative priorities to the different departmental requests and then comparing the associated costs to available funding Finally, meetings were held separately with each City Councilmember to discuss the components of the proposed budget before the budget was considered for formal adoption. 15 DANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT Article Xlrm of the California Slate Constitution, more commonly referred to as the Gann Initiative or Gann Limit, was adopted by California voters in 1980 and placed limits on the amount of proceeds of taxes that slate and local governmental agencies can receive and appropriate (authorize to spend) each year. The limit is different for each agency and the limit changes each year. Each year's limit is based on the amount of tax proceeds that were authorized to be spent in fiscal year 1978-79 in each agency, modified for changes in inflation and population in each subsequent year. For cities which incorporated after 1978-79, such as the City of Temecula, the initial appropriations limit was set by the voters at the time of incorporation. In accordance with the Government Code Section 56842.6 the City is required to recompute the Gann limit since incorporation based on actual tax revenues and place the new limit on the ballot at the tirst general election after incorporation which is November 10, 1992. In~ationary adjustments are, by law, based on increases in the March-to-March U.S., or California, All Urban Consumer Price Index. The State Department of Finance provides the City with the required annual population change factor to be used for the appropriations limit calculations. The City's appropriation limit of $ was adopted in the form of Resolution Number 93- For the FY 1993-94 the City's estimated tax proceeds to be received, as well as tax proceeds appropriated by the City Council, will be $ under the legal limit. 16 UNDERSTANDING THE BUDGET I' OC ENT This budget document provides the public with concise and readable information about City government and displays the City's objectives and budget for the 1993-94 fiscal year. The budget document begins with the City Manager's transmittal letter which provides an overview of the fiscal year 1993-94 Operating Budget by highlighting programs and major projects. The budget document is then divided into the following sections. Introduction Budget Graphics and Summaries Operating Budget Budget Reference Material The Budget Graphics and Summaries Section provides revenue and expenditure analysis. This section presents historical and categorical data for comparative purposes. Staffing levels are also summarized. The Operating Budget Section contains the program description, objectives, and resource allocation plans for each operating program. Budget information is organized by department which identify the major services provided by the City. Finally, the Budget Reference Material includes a glossary of terms used in the budget document, and fund descriptions. Additional information on the City's fiscal affairs is available in the following documents at the City offices: City Treasurer's Monthly Reports Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 17 COMMUNITY PROFrf.E Form of Government Population Area Streets City Maintained Streets Libraries: (contract with Riverside County) Fire Protection: (contract with Rivehide County) Number of Stations Number of Staff- Fire FightergOfficen Number of Volunteer Fire Fighters Police Protection: (contract with Riverside County) Number of Stations Number of Sworn Officers General Law Officers Special Investigation Team K-9 Police Crime Prevention School Resources Traffic Motorcycle Patrol Education: Temecula Unified School District Number of Schools Number of Teachers Number of Students Recreation and Culture: Park Sites Number of Acres (40 acres developed) Hotel/Motels: Number of Lodging Properties Total Number of Rooms City Employment: Number of Proposed Positions 18 December 1, 1989 Council/Manager 31,344 26 Square Miles 200 Miles 82 Miles 1 2 29 30 1 31 24 2 1 1 1 2 9 376 8,431 5 245 8 618 101 BUDGET GRAPHICS AND SUMMARIES BUDGET GRAPHICS AND SUMMARmS OVF, RVIF, W The Budget Graphics and Summaries Section includes a breakdown of revenues and expenditures by funds including General Fund specifics and City totals. The graphs and summaries presented include the following: General Fund Revenues General Fund Revenues by Source Revenues by Source - City Revenues by Source - City - Three Year Comparison Revenues by Source - Community Services District Revenues by Source - Community Services District - Three Year Comparison Expenditures by Department - City Expenditures Summary by Department Expenditures Summary by Department - Three Year Comparison Changes in Fund Balance by Fund Proposed Positions by Department Summary of Authorized Positions by Department Personnel Allocation by Department 19 GENERAL FUND RF~VENIIE~ 93-94 GENERAL FUND REVENUES $12,930,146 Sales/Use Tax 44% Property Trans Pro p elr~ey Tax 6% Lic/Permits/Serv 15% Trans Occupancy 3% R 'mbursements e~ 4% Franchise Fees 5% Intergovt Structural Investments 9% Fire Tax 2% 11% THREE YEAR COMPARISON $14/'] , ..i $12 ~ 'i Slo. : $8' $6. $4' '; g ; S2' 2.991-92 $13,31S -[ .... I ii . . I 1992-93 1993-94 931 'l. 20 GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY SOURCE Taxes and Franchise Property Tax Franchise Fees Sales and Use Tax Property Transfer Tax Transient Occupancy Tax Structural Fire Tax Licenses, Permits, and Service Charges Business Licenses Engineering: Other Plan Check Inspection Building Planning Fire Plan Check and Inspection Fines and Forfeitures Use of Money Interest Revenue Intergovernmental Revenues Motor Vehicle in Lieu Cigarette Tax All 2766 Reimbursement from Capital Improvement Program Assistant Engineer - TCSD Redevelopmerit Agency Community Services District Contributions Miscellaneous General Fund Total FY 1991-92 Estimated FY 1992-93 $ 1,027,843 $ 1,071,252 683,756 660,000 5,655,974 5,300,000 125,140 130,000 489,150 496,979 0 0 Proje FY 1993-94 $ 824,040 680,000 5,600,000 130,000 450,000 1,373,179 55,789 70,000 70,000 1,899,611 500,000 300,000 430,000 300,000 809,837 1,000,000 1,000,000 440,788 150,000 150,000 0 0 70,000 64,806 54,000 54,000 335,751 300,000. 275,000 1,047,876 1,058,396 1,061,026 35,312 0 0 0 0 18,000 261,274 266,301 0 0 58,307 30,000 75,000 75,000 250,000 227,704 155,293 0 0 0 363.944 15.000 20.000 $13.315.577 $11.799.605 $12.930.146 21 REVENUES BY SOURCE- CITY General Fund~~' 96% Gas Tax Fund · .,..'~ Z,Z ....: ..': ~.. , .4% ,' 93-94 Total City Revenues $13,497,504 · 22 REVENUES BY SOURCE- CITY Projected FY 1991-92 FY 1992-93 FY 1993-94 General Fund $13,315,577 $11,799,605 $12,930,146 Gas Tax Fund 576,003 555,138 567,358 Transportation Fund 334.241 0 0 Total City Revenues $14.225.821 $12.354.743 $13.497.504 TttREE YEAR COMPARISON (Values in Millions) $16 / $14 $10 $8 $6 $4 $2 1991-92 $14.225 / ..................... $13;497 .... ~:.:.,: ' $12.3 54 "'" . . ': . : - . ~, . : ,. ~ ...... - . . :. .~.~ :_,~:~ ~;. :: . ~ ~ ;.,.: - .;.:.; .7'.':.'~. 1992-93 1993-94 23 REVENUES BY SOURCE- COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT City-Wide Assessment Service Level A Service Level B Service Level C Service Level D Recreation Fees Total Community' Services District Revenues Projected FY 1991-92 FY 1992-93 FY 1993-94 $1,908,095 $2,164,534 $2,415,360 137,012 154,776 311,517 192,651 192,650 191,765 389,010 481,414 422,801 909,227 1,250,365 1,379,730 0 174.040 176.500 $3.535.995 $4.417.779 $ 4.897.673 $6 / THREE YEAR COMPARISON (Value in Millions) $5 $3 $2 $1 1991-92 $3.536 .,,/ / -4 i i i $4.418 ,/ 1992-93 1993-94 24 EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT - CITY Finance 6% Public Works City 15% Council 2% City Manager 4% Non-Dept 3% Planning 8% Attorney city Clerk Fire Building &Safety 14% 6% Police 30% 93-94 Expenditures $13,556,476 25 EXPENDITURES RY DEPARTMF, NT - CITY Materials Capital Department Personnel &Services Outlay City Counc~ $ 59,623 $ 234,007 $ 0 City Manager 350,767 120,220 2,400 City Attorney 0 225,000 0 City Clerk 247, 195 142,270 0 Finance 527,705 236,532 0 Human Resources 146,023 63,915 0 Planning 715,196 314,927 2,000 Building &Safety 463,145 263,390 0 Engineering 692,505 231,939 11,500 Public Works 726,262 1,276,088 5,000 Police Services 0 4,104,3 15 0 Fire Services 0 1,855,052 3,500 Animal Control 0 86,000 0 Non-Departmental 0 450.000 0 Total $3.928.421 $9.603.655 $24.409 Total $ 293,630 2.2 95 473,387 3.5 95 225,000 1.7 95 389,465 2.9 % 764,237 5.6 95 209,938 1.5 1,032,123 7.6 95 726,535 5.4 % 935,944 6.9 95 2,007,350 14.8 95 4,104,315 30.3 95 1,858,552 13.7 95 86,000 0.6 95 450.000 3.3 95 $13.556.476 100 95 26 EXPENDITURE SUM]VIARY BY DEPART1VI NT Three Year Comparison CITY COUNCIL Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Personnel $ 90,510 $ 79,609 $ 59,623 Materials & Sewices 406,487 338,891 234,007 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 Total $ 496.997 $ 418.500 $ 293.630 CITY MANAGER Personnel $ 487,908 $ 392,064 $ 350,767 Materials & Services 68,178 136,317 120,220 Capital Outlay 533 0 2.400 Total $. 556.619 $ 528.381 $ 473.387 Program: Human Resources Personnel $ 80,760 $136,436 $146,023 Materials & Services 21,196 62,590 63,915 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 CITY ATTORNEY Personnel Materials & Services Capital Outlay Total $101.956 $199,026 $ 209.938 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 202,411 390,000 0 0 0 225.000 Total $ 202.411 $ 390.000 $ 225.000 27 EXPENDITURE S RY BY DEPART1VIENT Three Year Comparison (Continued) CITY CLERK Personnel Materials & Services Capital Ou~ay Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 $ 233,482 $ 236,453 $ 247,195 22,951 167,734 142,270 525 1.300 0 Total $ 256.958 $ 405.487 $ 389.465 FINANCE Personnel Matetiffs & Services Capital Outlay Total NON-DEPARTMENTAl. Personnel Materials & Services Capital Outlay Total $ 436,848 $ 502,623 101,538 205,130 0 0 $ 538.386 $ 707.753 $ 0 $ 0 928,541 449,495 275.546 33.200 $ 527,705 236,532 0 $ 764.237 $ 0 450,000 0 $1.204.087 $ 482.695 $ 450.000 PLANNING Personnel $ 408,862 $ 670,502 Matetiffs &Services 801,669 44 1,933 Capital Outlay 17.096 1.500 Total $1.227.627 $1.113.935 BUILDING AND SAFETY Personnel $ 417,548 $ 442,475 Materials &Services 115,744 314,476 Capital Outlay 73.755 0 $ 715,196 314,927 2.000 $1.032.123 $ 463,145 263,390 0 Total $ 607.047 $ 756.951 $ 726.535 28 EXPENDITUR S ARY BY DEPART1VIENT Three Year Comparison (Continued) ENGINEERING Personnel Materials & Services Capital Outlay PUBLIC WORKS Personnel Materials & Services Capital Ou~ay POLICE SERVICES Personnel Materials & Services Capital Outlay FIRE SERVICES Personnel Materials & Services Capital Outlay ANIMAL CON'I~OL Personnel Materials & Services Capital Outlay Total Total Total Actual Budgeted Propo~! 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 $ 181,010 $ 676,459 $ 692,505 1,103,083 356, 178 231,939 525 29.505 11.500 $1.284.618 $1.062.142 $ 935,944 $ 372,283 $ 512,181 $ 726,262 1,085,591 1,364,756 1,276,088 30.369 24.710 5.000 $1.901.647 $1.488.243 $ 0 $ 0 3,590,351 4,203,314 17.906 20.800 $ 4.224.114 $ 3.608.257 $ 0 $ 0 494,345 624,043 3.553 220.459 Total $ 497.898 $ 844.502 $ 2.007.350 $ 0 4,104,315 0 Total $4.104.315 $ 0 1,855,052 3.500 $1.858.552 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 72,317 85,920 86,000 0 0 0 $ 72.317 $ 85.920 $ 86.000 29 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY D -PARTM ,NT Three Year Comparison (Continued) COM]vYLrNITY SERVICI~-q DISTRICT City Wide Personnel Materials St Services Capital Outlay Service Level A Personnel Materials & Services Capital Ou~ay Service Level B Personnel Materials & Services Capital Outlay Service Level C Personnel Materials & Services Capital Ou~ay Total Total Total Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 $ 640,366 $ 688,600 813,481 1,248,884 223,081 512.620 $1.676,928 $ 2.450.104 $ 9,482 $ 16,776 358,557 138,000 0 0 $ 368.039 $ 154.776 $ 11,590 $ 26,432 120,567 166,218 0 0 $ 132,157 $ 192.650 $ 58,590 $ 62,173 309,623 420,324 0 0 $ 804,927 1,303,064 547.000 $ 2.654.991 $ 84,291 177,026 50.2O0 $ 311.517 $ 26,253 165,512 0 $ 1.91.765 $ 68,952 353,849 0 Total $ 368.213 $ 482.497 $ 422.801 3o EXPENDITURE SUMIVIARY BY DEPART1VIENT Three Year Comparison (Continued) Service Level D Personnel Materials & Services Capital Outlay Total Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 0 $ 0 841,993 1,319,628 0 0 $ 0 1,419,000 0 $ 841.993 $1.319.628 $1.419.000 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Insurance Personnel Matetiffs & Services Capital Outlay Total 0 $ 26,034 119,134 170,000 0 0 119.134 $ 196.034 26,617 172,500 0 199.117 Vehicles Personnel Materials & Services Capital Outlay Information Systems Personnel Materials & Services Capital Outlay Total Total 0 $ 0 0 96,436 0 0 0 $ 96.436 0 $ 52,024 0 303,321 0 45.900 $ 0 $. 401.245 $ 0 109,661 0 109.661 63,680 300,346 0 364.o2~ 31 EXPENDITURI~, SUMMARY BY DF-PARTMENT Three Year Comparison (Continued) Copy Center Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Personnel $ 0 $ 60,950 Materials & Services 0 97,977 Capital Outlay 0 3.057 Total $ 0 $ 161.984 $ 29,841 89,173 0 $ 119.014 Facilities Personnel Materials & Services Capital Outlay $ 0 $ 0 0 0 0 0 Total $ 0 $ 0 $ 55,873 420,424 0 476.297 32 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE BY FUND · Revenues (Estimated) Other Sources: Operating Transfer in from General Fund Operating Transfer in from Local Trampon. Total Revenues and Other Sources Expenditures (Appropriations) Other Sources / (Uses): Operating Transfer out to General Fund Operating Transfer out to Gas Tax Total Other Uses Revenues and Other Sources Over Expenditures and Other Uses Fund Balance/Equity, July 1, 1993 '~ual Equity Transfer In/Out Special Revenue General Gas Local Fund Tax Transporation $ 12,930,146 $ 567,358 12,930,146 (11,549,126) (1,174,992) (1,174,992) 206,028 4,906,016 (100,000) 1,174,992 265,000 2,oo7,~5o (2,oo7,350) $ (26s,000) (265,000) (~s,000) 439,345 Redevelopment Low/Moderate Debt Housing Set Aside Service 1,956,487 1,3o4j35 (4o5,ooo) 1,956,487 (1,918333) 899~25 2X~rT,743 755,246 Fund Balance/Equity, June 30, 1994 Reserves: Reserve for Economic Uncertainty/Contingencies 10% Reserve for Road Improvements Reserve for Self-insured Retention Reserve for Low/Moderate Housing Set Aside Reserve for Replacement Value Designated for Engineering Services Unreserved Fund Balance 5,012,044 1272,412 1,055,000 2,684,632 $ 174345 174,345 $ 3,587,068 3,5~,068 $ 793,400 793,400 33 CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BY FUND (Continued) Revenues (Estimated) Other Sources: Operating Transfer in from General Fund Operating Transfer in [rom Local Transport. Total Revenues and Other Sources Expenditures (Appropriations) Other Sources / (Uses): Operating Transfer out to General Fund Operating Transfer out to Gas Tax Total Other Uses Revenues and Other Sources Over Expenditures and Other Uses Fund Balance/Equity, July 1, 1993 Residual Equity Transfer In/Out Self- Information Insurance Services $ 199,117 $ 364,016 Internal Service Funds Vehicles Copy Center $ 109,661 S 119,014 $ 199,117 ~4,026 109,661 119,014 (199,11'7) (:364,026) (109.661) (119,014) 145,485 100,000 Facilities 476297 476,297 (476,297) Fund Balance/Equity, June 30, 1994 Reserve for Economic Uncertainty/Contingencies 10% Reserve for Road Improvements Reserve for Self-insured Retention Reserve for Low/Moderate Housing Set Aside Reserve for Replacement Value Designated for Engineering Services Unreserved Fund Balance 245,485 245,485 $ $ S -34 CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BY FUND (Continued) Revenues Other Sources: Operating Transfer in from General Fund Residual Equity Transfer in from General Fund Total Revenues and Other Sources Expenditures (Appropriations) Other Sources / (Uses): Residual Equity Transfer out to Insurance Fund Operating Transfer out to Gas Tax Total Other Uses Revenues and Other Sourcea Over Expenditures and Other Uses Fund Balance July 1,199'3 City Service Wide Level A $ 2,591,860 $ 311,517 $ '(2,654,991) (311,517) Community Services Department Service Service Level B Level C 191,765" $ 422,801 Service Level D 1,S79gSO (191,765") (422,801) (1,379,7~0) 0 0 0 0 0 (63,131) , 0 0 0 0 344,177 2'7,649 47,747 141,166 (22,0~) Fund Balance, June :34), 1994 Reserve for Economic Uncertainty/Contingencies 10% Reserve for Road Improvement,, Reserve for Self-insured Retention Reserve for Low/Moderate Housing Set Aside Reserve for Replacement Value Designated for Engineering Services Unreserved Fund Balance 281,046 27,649 265,499 15,547 $ 27,649 $ 47,747 141,166 47,747 $ 141,166 35 PROPOSED POSITIONS BY DEPARTMENT Finance City Internal 10 Clerk Serv Fund 5.5 4.5 nunding & · .- .i~i~ii!~i!i!!!~!iiiii!?'Serv Dist Safety Manager 5 Public Works 12.5 Planning Human 13 Resources 3 City Council 5 Engineering 12.5 Total Proposed Positions 101 36 SUMMARY OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 City Council 5.00 5.00 5.00 City Manager 9.00 5.00 5.00 City Clerk 6.50 5.50 5.50 Finance 10.00 10.00 10.00 Human Resources 0.00 3.00 3.00 Planning 11.00 13.00 13.00 Building and Safety 11.00 11.00 11.00 Engineering 2.75 13.75 12.50 Public Works 9.25 9.25 12.50 Internal Service Funds 0.00 3.50 4.50 Total City Positions 64.50 79.00 82.00 Community Services District 17.00 17.00 19.00 Total Authorized Posltions 81 .~Q 96.00 101.0Q 37 PERSONNET, AT ,T OCATION BY DEPARTMI ,NT (Full Time Equivalents listed) Authorized Changes Reo~n,,urt~ 1992-93 1993-94 1993-94 Department: CITY COUNCIL Councilmembers Department Total Depaxtrnent: CITY MANAGER City Manager Assistant City Manager Senior Management Analyst Executive Assistant Administrative Secretary Department Total Division: HUMAN RESOURCES Human Resources Administrator Personnel Specialist Department Total Department: CITY CLERK City Clerk Deputy City Clerk Office Specialist Office Assistant Department Total 5.00 0.00 5.O0 0.~ 5.~ 3.O0 0.~ 3.~ 1.~ 0.~ 1.~ 1.~ 0.~ 1.~ 1.50 0.~ 1.50 2.~ 0.~ 2.~ 5.5O 0. O0 5.5O 38 PERSONNEL AI,LOCATION BY DEPARTMENT (Full Time Equivalents listed, Continued) Authorized Changes RBmmn'~d 199243 199344 199344 Department: FINANCE Finance Officer Chief Accountant Financial Services Administrator Senior Accountant Administrative Secretary Accounting Specialist Cashier Office Assistant Accounting Assistant Department Total Department: PLANNING Director of Planning Senior Planner Associate Planner Assistant Planner Planning Technician Administrative Secretary Office Specialist Office Assistant Department Total Department: BUILDING AND SAFETY Chief Building Official Senior Building Inspector Building Inspector II Code Enforcement Officer Building Inspector I Building Technician Administrative Secretary Office Assistant Department Total 1.~ 0.~ 1.~ 1.~ 0.~ 1.~ 0.~ 0.~ 0.~ 1.~ 0.~ 1.~ 0.~ 0.~ 0.~ 3.~ 0.~ 3.~ 1.~ 0.~ 1.~ 1.~ 0.~ 1.~ 0.50 '0.~ 0.50 13.00 0.00 13.00 11.00 39 PERSONNF, L AT,T-OCATION Ry I~I~-PARTMF, NT (Full Time Equivalents listed, Continued) Authorized Changes P,m~lhratled 1992-93 1993-94 1993-94 Department: ENGINEFRING City Engineer/Director of Public Works.20 Principal Engineer 1.75 Traffic Engineer 1.00 Permit Engineer .20 Associate Engineer ZOO Senior Public Works Inspector 1.60 Assistant Engineer 2,00 Public Works Inspectors 2.00 Engineering Technician ZOO Engineering Aide 1.00 Administrative Secretary 0.00 Office Assistant 0.00 Department Total 0.30 0.50 (0.75) 1.00 (1.00) 0.00 0.80 1.00 (1.00) 1.00 (0.60) 1.00 0.00 2.00 (1.00) 1.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 1.50 1.50 13.75 ~ ) 12.50 Department: PUBLIC WORKS City Engineer/Director of Public Works0.80 Principal Engineer 0.25 Traffic Engineer 0.00 Maintenance Superintendent 1.00 Permit Engineer 0.80 Associate Engineer 0.00 Senior Public Works Inspector 0.40 Assistant Engineer 0.00 Public Works Inspector 0.00 Traffic Technician 1.00 Lead Maintenance Worker 1.00 Administrative Secretary 1.00 Maintenance Worker 1.00 Office Assistant 2.00 ( 0.30 ) 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 (0.80) 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 ( 0.50 ) 0.50 0.00 1.00 ( 0.50 ) 1.50 Department Total 9.25 3.2~ 12.50 4O PERSONNEl, ALl OCATION RY F~EPARTMF3qT (Full Time Equivalents listed, Continued) Authorized Changes 1992-93 1993-94 1993-94 Department: INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Administrative Technician 1.00 Maintenance Worker 1.00 Custodian 0.00 Systems Analyst 1.00 Financial Services Administrator 0.25 Administrative Secretary 0.25 Total Internal Service Funds 3.50 City Totals 79.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.25 0.25 4.50 82~oo 41 PF-RSONNF, I~ ALLOCATION FIX DF, PARTM~,NT (Full Time Equivalents listed, Continued) Authorized Changes Pana.~k~d~l 1992-93 1993-94 1993-94 Department: COMMUNH'Y SERVICES Director of Community Services 1.00 Development Services Administrator 1.00 Senior Management Analyst 0.00 Recreation Superintendent 1.00 Maintenance Superintendent 1.00 Recreation Supervisor 2.00 Administrative Secretary 1.00 Recreation Coordinator 2.00 Maintenance Worker 2.00 Volunteer Coordinator 1.00 Office Assistant 2.00 Department Total Service Level A Landscape Technician Lead Maintenance Worker Maintenance Worker Department Total Service LeVel B Office Assistant Department Total Service Level C Development Assistant Landscape Technician Department Total Total Community Service 14.00 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.45 1.00 0.55 1.55 xT.oQ (1.oo) 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 ZOO 2.00 1.00 2.00 14.00 0.45 1.00 1.00 2.4~; 1.00 0.55 1.55 ~9.o~ 42 OPERATING BUDGET OPERATING BUDGET OV RVIEW The following section is an expenditure summary and narrative account of the General Fund Operating Budget. The City functions have been categorized by depamnent and operating program and are presented in the following order: DEPARTMENT City Council City Manager City Attorney City Clerk Finance Non-Departmental Planning Building and Safety Engineering Police Sexyices Fire Services Animal Control Public Works - Gas Tax Community Services District Internal Service Funds Facilities Insurance Vehicles .Information Systems Copy Center Redevelopment Agency Community Development Block Grant 43 DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL Program: Description: Goals: Key Objectives: Legislative Poficy The City Council is elected by the citizens of Temecula to set legislative policy and to identify the types and levels of programs and services to be provided by the City. Maintain a safe, secure, clean, healthy, and orderly community. Balance the utilization of open space, parks, trail facilities, quality jobs, public transportation, diverse housing, and adequate infrastructure. Encourage programs for all age groups. Utilize human resources. Preserve natural resources while stimulating technology and promoting commerce. Utilize sound fiscal policy. Enhance and revitalize historic areas. Provide clear policy direction to City staff in programs and services to be offered by the City of Temecula. Adopt policies and procedures, and take legislative action consistent with goals. Significant Changes: Redistribution of salaries to show charges to other agencies, e.g., Re, development Agency and Temecula Community Services District. Addition of Commission Recognition Program. Addition of Facilities Internal Service Fund. 44 DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCII, Funding Some: General Fund Expenditure Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Personnel $ 90,510 $ 79,609 $ 59,623 Materials &Services 406,487 338,891 234,007 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 Total $ 496.997 $ 418.500 $ 293.630 Personnel Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Total 5 5 5 45 DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER Organizational Chart Preparedness Coordination _ Benefits _ Telecommunications _ Franchise Administration _ Training Employment Computer Network _ Government Access Channel Emergency Training Operations -- Center _Em ployee Relotions 46 DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER City Manager Description: The City Manager is appointed by the City Council to serve as the Chief Administrative Officer of the organization. The City Manager's Office coordinates the implementation of policy and programs established by the City Council. Program areas for which this department is responsible include overall administration of programs and services, strategic planning, redevelopment, economic development, information systems management, emergency management, cable television franchise, and human resources. The City Manager's Office also serves as the liaison in intergovernmental relations. Goals: Provide professional administrative assistance to the City Council in establishing the policies, programs, and services to be offered to the community. Key Objectives: Provide overall direction to the administration of programs and services. Coordinate economic development program. Implement human resources, information systems, cable TV government channel, and special projects for the organization. Coordinate strategic planning. Coordinate emergency preparedness activities. Actively participate in intergovernmental relations/lobbying efforts and provide public information regarding activities of other agencies. Performance Measures: Issue one million dollars in small business loans by June 1994. Hold three business leader summits during Fiscal Year 1993-94. Coordinate two employee customer service workshops by June 1994. Develop a strategic plan for information systems resources by March 1994. Organize the Temecula Neighborhood Emergency Services Team Program by January 1994. Certify the City to monitor cable TV rates and services by August 1993. 47 DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER (Continued) Program: Performance Measures: City Manager (Continued) Adopt revised job descriptions by October 1993. Adopt revised personnel policies and procedures by February 1994. Significant Changes: Emergency management and cable TV established as divisions of City Manager's Department. Addition of Facilities Internal Service Fund. 48 DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGFR (Continued) Program: Description: Goals: Key Objectives: Emergency Management In the event of emergency, the City Manager is the Disaster Director. The City Manager's Office implements, monitors, and coordinates the Incident Command System and Emergency Operations Center. This office also has overall responsibility for emergency preparedness. Provide overall coordination, promote training, and monitor operational readiness within the finance, logistics, operations, and plans sections of the emergency management organizational structure. Coordinate emergency preparedness training and exercises. Finalize development of functional Emergency Operations Center and secondary sites. Monitor disaster recovery operations to assure proper monetary reimbursement from Federal Emergency Management Agency for January 1993 community floods. 49 DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGRR (Continued) Description: Goal: Key Objectives: Cable Television The City of Temecula has a current franchise with Inland Valley Cablevision for provision of cable TV services to the City's residents. The nature of the franchise and changing law affecting cable TV require the City to monitor franchise compliance. In addition, the franchise agreement provides a grant of funds and access for operation of a government channel on the cable system. The City currently broadcasts council meetings on a taped-delay basis. It is the City's intent to establish a fully functional government access channel with controlled programming. Provide continued monitoring of franchise performance, and establish policies, programs, and services for the implementation of a government access cable TV channel. Furnish broadcast and recording facilities in the Community Recreation Center for operation of a governmental access channel. Develop appropriate policies, guidelines, and oversight committee for government access channel. Continue monitoring of cable franchise. 5O DEPARTMF NT: CITY MANAGER (Continued) Description: Goals: Key Objectives: Human Resources is a Division of the City Manager's Department. The Human Resources Division is responsible for providing a comprehensive human resources program throughout the City. Responsibilities of Human Resources include the administration of recruitment; selection; equal opportunity; classification; employee benefits; worker's compensation; discipline; training development; employee relations; and development and implementation of personnel policies. To provide assistance to all departments in the recruitment, selection and retention of high calibre employees. To provide responsive support to supervisors and employees on personnel related issues. To administer and maintain a centrali7ed human resources function within the City Manager's Office. To develop and maintain clear, distinct, progressive and effective human resources policies and procedures. 51 DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER Program: City Manager Funding Source: General Fund Expenditure Summsl:y Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Personnel $ 487,908 $ 392,064 $ 350,767 Materials & Services 68,178 136,317 120,220 Capital Outlay 533 0 2.400 Total $ 556.619 $ 528.381 $ 473.387 Personnel Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Total 9 5 5 52 DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER (Continued) Program: Human Resources Funding Source: General Fund Expenditure Summary Personnel Materials & Services Capital Ou~ay Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 $ 80,760 $136,436 $146,023 21,196 62,590 63,915 0 0 0 Total $101.956 $199.026 $ 209.938 Personnel Summary Total Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 3 3 53 DEPARTIVIENT: CITY ATTORN -Y Program: Description: Goals: Key Objectives: City Attorney The City Attorney acts as legal advisor to the City Council, City Manager, the various City departments, commissions, committees, and boards. The City Attorney prepares and approves for legality the majority of proposed City ordinances, resolutions, contractS, and other legal documents. The City Attorney also represents the City in all litigation for the City. Provide oral advice and opinions as requested. Review and prepare ordinances, resolutions, contracts, and agreements. Attend meetings of the City Council and Plann'mg Commission to advise upon the legality of all activity. Review and process claims against the City, including legal defense in selected situations. Prosecute and defend civil lawsuits involving the City. Provide timely legal advice to City advisory bodies and staff. Provide litigation capability on behalf of the City. Significant Changes: None 54 DEPARTMENT: CITY ATTORNEY Funding Source: General Fund Expenditure Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Personnel $ 0 Materials &Services 202,411 Capital Outlay 0 $ 0 $ 0 390,000 225,000 0 0 Total $ 202.411 $ 390.000 $ 225.000 Personnel Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Total 0 O. 0 55 DEPART1VIENT: CITY CLF, RK Organizational Chart Support Services City Clerk Administrative Services -- Council Support -- Copy Center -- Elections -- Reception Services -- Legislative History -- Public Information -- Records Management 56 DEPARTMENT: CITY CLERK Progrnm: City Clerk Description: The City Clerk's Detnu'trnent is responsible for the management, care and maintenance of all official City records; preparation for City Council and other official City meetings; recording and finalizing all City Council, Temecula Community Services District and Temeeula Redevelopment Agency minutes; preparation and certification of all official City documents; administration of City elections and ballot measures related to City issues. The City Clerk's office publishes notices and ordinances as required by law and assists the staff and public in researching information. Goals: Assist the public .in every way possible in a courteous and professional manner. Provide support for the City Council and City staff in all areas relating to the preparation of agendas, minutes and follow-up of official Council actions. Administer the City-wide Records Management program. Plan and administer all municipal elections and election related matters. Key Objectives: Provide the complete range of services required of the Office of the City in a cost-effective and timely manner. Fully automate a City-wide Records Management program which includes a uniform function filing system and records retention schedules. Fully implement a comprehensive program for transferring inactive City records to microf'~m. Develop an Emergency Records Management Program to deal with protection of City documents in the event of a disaster. Performance Measures: Prepare 38 agendas and packets for City Council, Temecula Community Services District, and Temecula Redevelopment Agency Meetings. Record, transcribe and ~nalize 90 sets of minutes for City Council, Temecula Community Services District, Redevelopment Agency, Planning Commission, Traffic and Transportation Commission, Public Safety Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, and Temecula Redevelopment Advisory Committee. 57 DEPARTMENT: CITY CI,F, RK (Continued) City Clerk (Continued) Publish, post and process 20 ordinances. Prepare and finalize 90 resolutions. Publish, post, mail, and coordinate on-site signs for 40 Public Hearings. Process 100 City Contracts and Agreements. Significant Changes: Addition of Facilities Internal Service Fund. 58 DEPARTMENT: CITY CLERK Funding Source: General Fund Expenditure Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Personnel $ 233,482 $ 236,453 $ 247, 195 Materials & Services 22,951 167,734 142,270 Capital Outlay 525 1.300 0 Total $ 256.958 $ 405.487 $. 389.465 Personnel Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Total 6.5 5.5 5.5 59 DEPARTMENT: FINANCE Organizational Chart Fiscal Services Finance Officer Fiscal Support Services ' Accounts Payable ' Budgeting ' Accounts Receivable ' Purchasing Business Licenses ' Risk Management ' Cashier ' Payroll 6O DEPARTMENT: FINANCE Program: Fiscal Services Description: The Fiscal Services Program is responsible for managing the City's financial operations in accordance with established fiscal policies. Primary responsibilities include cash management, general accounting including financial reporting, internal audit, payroll, accounts payable, accounts receivable, financial oversight, and administration of all City funds and accounts. Goals: Key Objectives: Manage the City's investment portfolio with the safety of principal as the primary objective, and return on investment as the secondary objective while maintaining liquidity to meet the City's obligations. Maintain a financial reporting system to meet the needs of the City Council and operating departments, including adequate internal controls. Continue to provide timely and accurate financial reports for the decision makers and operating departments as well the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Automate and integrate the activity recorded on Development Services' "Sierra" information system with the City's fund accounting system. Continue to prepare the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report to obtain an unqualified audit opinion and-to comply with the California Society Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO) and Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) award criteria. Actively participate in CSMFO Inter-governmental Relations Committee. Performance Measures: Process payroll checks. Submit four quarterly financial statements to City Council for each City entity. Process 1,500 purchase orders. Process 7,000 vendor voucher packages. Coordinate the Redevelopment Agency small business incentive loan program. 61 DEPARTMENT: FINANCE (Continued) Fiscal Services (Continued) Significant Changes: Addition of Facilities Internal Service Fund. 62 DEPARTMENT: FINANCR (Continued) Program: Budgeting Dese/'iption: The Budget Program coordinates and develops the annual City operating budget and mid-year review. The program provides for revenue management, budget analysis and control. The Budget Program also monitors fiscal transactions, identifies trends and ensures a coherent integration of cost effective programs and associated financial planning. The program is also responsible for preparation of the five year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Goals: Coordinate the development of and maintain the City's long range, multi- year financial plan, including the CIP. Key Objectives: Continue to prepare an Operating Budget and CIP that qualifies for annual budget awards of the Government Finance Officers Association and the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers. Report long range revenue and operating expenditure forecasts. Continue to update the indirect cost plan to provide full cost of service information, establishment of fee schedules, and facilitate indirect cost reimbursements. Monitor expenditures to ensure budgeting integrity. Performance Measures: Complete Annual Operating Budget and Mid-Year Review. Complete Five Year Capital Improvement Program Budget. Significant Changes: None 63 DEPARTMENT: FINANCF, (Continued) Risk Management Description: The Risk Management Program provides for the protection of the City's assets through-risk identification, avoidance, transfer, and financing through insurance and other risk-sharing mechanisms. Risk Management evaluates pubtic liability insurance, safety, and loss prevention activities in the best interest of the City and its citizens. Goals: Centralize a slandard risk management procedure and closely monitor the claims process to ensure cost effective efficiency. Establish a computer assisted history of all insurance coverage and prepare an efficient storage system for all original documents. Key Objectives: Complete a safety program including publishing a safety manual. Distribute a risk management policy and procedures manual for staff use. Continue to conduct safety training for all City employees. Reduce the level of risk exposure by continuing to search for sources of coverage through traditional markets and other available sources. Performance Measures: Process twenty four Claims for Damages. Conduct four Safety Committee meetings. Conduct six Safety Training sessions. Significant Changes: None 64 DEPARTMENT: FINANCE Funding Source: General Fund Expenditure Summary Personnel Materials & Services Capital Outlay Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 $ 436,848 $ 502,623 $ 527,705 101,538 205,130 236,532 0 0 0 Total $ 538.386 $ 707.753 $. 764.237 Personnel Summary Total Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 10 10 10 65 DEPARTM ,NT: NON-DRPART1VIRNTA Description: Non-Departmental In prior fiscal years the Non-Departmental Program has unallocated City-wide overhead expenditures such communications, and facilities lease/rental. provided for as utilities, In Fiscal Year 1992-93 Internal Service Funds were created for Insurance, Vehicles, Information Systems/Communications, and Copy Center. In Fiscal Year 1993-94 all City Hall facilities charges will be charged to the Facilities Internal Service Fund. Signfiicam Changes: The Non-Departmentnl budget exists only for county property tax administration charges and sales tax reimbursement for Costco and property owners in the Community Facilities District 88-12. 66 DEPARTMENT: NON-DEPARTMENTAL Funding Source: General Fund Expenditure Summary Personnel Materials & Services Capital Outlay Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 $ 0 928,541 275.546 $ 0 $ 0 449,495 450,000 33.200 0 Total $1.204.087 $ 482.695 $ 450.000 Personnel Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Total 0 0 0 67 DEPARTMENT: PI,ANNING Organizational Chart Planning Director Current Planning Advanced Planning Development Review - General Plan PUblic Information Ordinance Development CEQA Management Specific Plans 68 DEPARTMENT: P -ANNING Program: Description: Goals: Key Objectives: Current Planning The Current Planning Program provides a variety of planning services to the Community; The review and processing of development proposals for conformance with City policies and regulations. Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act relative to development proposals. Staff support services for the City Planning Commission and City Council. Assistance to the general public and applicants relative to planning information and application processing. Maintain effective and efficient review and processing of entitlement requests. Provide the public and applicants with courteous and timely responses with regards for information and services. Keep the City Council and Planning Commission informed about land use revisions affecting the community. Review and comment on development projects located outside of the City to ensure that the interests of the City are protected. Continue development of procedures to expedite the processing of development proposals. Implement the goals, policies, and objectives of the City's future General Plan as it relates to development proposals. Continue to provide a superior and highly responsive level of the public services relative to requests for information and services. Schedule Planning Commission workshops to discuss major cases (i.e. Specific Plans) prior to scheduling public hearings. 69 DEPARTMENT: PLANNING (Continued) Current Planning (~ontinued) Performance Measures: Provide for the timely processing of complete development applications within the following timelines: Administrative C~.~s Seven to Fourteen working days after receipt of a complete application. Development Review Committee Meetings All applications will be scheduled for three to four weeks after initial ~ing or re-filing of requested information. Planning Director's Hearings After the application is determined to be complete, the case will be scheduled for the first available heating (either within fourteen days if exempt from Environmental Review or 25 days if Notice of Determination is required). Target processing time is approximately eight to nine weeks for a *clean' application. Planning Commission Hearing Because of reduced application activity, the Planning Commission is only meeting once a month. This could cause a slight delay of two weeks, but the target processing time is still projected to be nine to eleven weeks for clean, non-controversial projects. Cit~ Council Hearin2 Significant Changes: Projects requiring City Council review will require a minimum of three to four weeks additional processing time, assuming no scheduling problem. Total target processing time for clean, non- controversial projects requiring City Council approval is twelve to fifteen weeks. For projects with concurrent re-zone applications, an additional two to four weeks would be required. Addition of Facilities Internal Service Fund. 70 DEPARTMENT: PI ANNING (Continued) Description: Goals: Key Objectives: Advanced Planning The Advanced Planning Program is responsible for a variety of long-range planning issues affecting the community; these include: Adoption and maintenance of the City's future General Plan, including required updatea. Preparation of special land use studies of concern to the City. Maintenance of vital demographic information. Processing of amendments to the future General Plan and revisions to the City's land use ordinances. Once adopted, maintain and update the General Plan in a timely manner. Respond to requests for City Council special studies and/or ordinance amendments quickly and efficien~y. Provide timely and accurate information to City staff and the general public relative to the General Plan. Administer the preparation and maintenance of the General Plan and Zoning Codes, December 1993, and prepare Planning Studies, complete Chaparral Area Planning Study, October 1993. Update Housing Element per State Department of Housing and Community Development requirement, May 1994. Develop Design Guidelines for Commercial and Village Center development, in order to implement the goals and policies found in the General Plan Community Design Element, June 1994. Prepare Landscape Ordinance to implement goals and policies found in the General Plan Community Design Element, June 1994. Develop Information Packet to assist the development community in preparing applications for the development review process, January 1994. Provide the Council and general public with accurate and timely response to requests for land use and demographic information, on going. 71 DEPARTMENT: PLANNING (Continued) Advanced Planning (Continued) Develop and prepare new City Ordinances, as necessary, in a timely Adopt the Old Town Specific Plan, September 1993. Coordinate and facilitate the creation of a Main Street Program consistent with the recommendations of the Old Town Specific Plan, October 1993 through June 1994. Integrate the Old Town Specific Plan into the City Capital Improvement Program, June 1994. Along with the Current Planning Division, assist in the training and professional development of staff. Significant Changes: Addition of Facilities Internal Service Fund. 72 DEPARTMENT: PLANNING Funding Source: General Fund Expenditure Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Personnel $ 408,862 $ 670,502 $ 715,196 Materials & Services 801,669 441,933 314,927 Capital Outlay 17.096 1.500 2.000 Total $1.227.627 $1.113.935 $1.032.123 Personnel Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Total 11 13 13 73 DEPARTMENT: BUILDING ANF~ SAFETY Organizational Chart Chief Building Official Building [ Inspections Code & Permits Enforcement Building -- Sign Inspections Abatement Plan Check Processing -- Abandoned Vehicle Permit -- Zoning Issuance Violation -- 'Substandard Housing Public Nuisance 74 DEPARTMENT: BUILDING AND SAFETY .- Program: Description: Goals: Key Objectives: Building Inspection Services The Building Inspection Services Program is responsible for enforcing the Building Safety codes of the City. The program performs plan checks on construction documents assuring that project proposals meet the building codes of the City. Building and Safety also distributes plans for review by other agencies or City departments, issues building permits after plans are complete and corrected, completes final inspections and issues certificates of occupancy. The program also performs special inspections, and implements certain state laws, such as the Unreinforced Masonry Building law. The program updates the Building and Fire codes as required by the State of California. Local amendments are also included with the code update. Provide guidance to the general public regarding the Uniform Building Codes and their application. Provide the public with information and guidance in building safety issues. Perform special inspections as needed to aid the, general public or provide support to other programs in their investigation. Establish procedures to ensure that plans are thoroughly reviewed and distributed to affected departments in a timely and efficient manner. Aid the Finance Department in the review of service fees. Maintain a responsive and efficient building, electrical, plumbing, and mechanical inspection program. Improve the issuance, tracking and retrieval capabilities with the implementation of a computer software program. Concentrate staff efforts in improving and maintaining public relations through dissemination of information and public contact. Performance Measures: 1,700 Plan Checks 4,500 Building Permits issued 650 Single Family dwelling starts 75 DEPARTMENT: RUH~DING AND SAFI:,TY (Continued) Program: Si~n|~caut Changes: Building Inspection Services (Continued) Addition of a Scantton Inspection Recording System for field weed abatement and code enforcement inspections. Addition of Facilities Internal Service Fund ?6 DEPARTMENT: BUILDING AND SAFETY (Continued) Program: Description: Goals: Key Objectives: Code Enforcement The Code Enforcement Program is responsible for managing, directing, planning, and coordinating the City's Code Enforcement Section; making administrative decisions and interpretations regarding inconsistencies or confficts related to various ordinances and regulations on behalf of the City. The officer reviews and initiates correspondence to violators, the City Attorney's office, and other City and County agencies in connection with ongoing investigations and enforcement activities. The Code Enforcement Program plays a major role in assisting the City Attorney in preparing all land use cases scheduled for court trial and provides documentation, photographs, and witnesses to support changes. The officer appears as an export witness in court; interprets and explains to the public and other City agencies the various provisions of the zoning, land use, and related ordinances; supervises the completion of periodic work reports; analyzes and evaluates City ordinances to identify problem areas; attends City Council, task force, and committee meetings on matters involving enforcement policy and problems. The Code Enforcement Officer also coordinates related enforcement activities with other City and County agencies, departments, and groups; prepares correspondence and complex reports on sensitive cases; develops and maintains standard workload measures. Provide guidance to the general public or provide support to other programs in their investigations. Establish procedures to ensure the efficiency in planning, organizing, directing, and coordination of the Code Enforcement Program. Represent the City, as a liaison, before the public, other departments and. agencies as an agent. Establish and maintain an effective program for defining problem areas; collecting and evaluating data; projecting consequences and trends; and implementing enforcement measures. Maintain a respOnsive Code Enforcement Program to handle community generated concerns and complaints. 77 DEPARTMF, NT: BUII-DING AND SAFF, TY (Continued) Significant Changes: Program: Code Enforcement (Continued) Performance Measures: Abate 50 vector control problems Abate 350 illegal signs Abate 400 service requests relating to land use and zoning issues. Conduct 30 Housing Inspections under the Uniform Housing Code. None 78 DEPARTMENT: BUILDING AND SAFETY Funding Source: General Fund Expenditure Summary Personnel Materials & Services Capital Ou~ay Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 $ 417,548 $ 442,475 $ 463,145 115,744 314,476 263,390 73.755 0 0 Total $ 607.047 $ 756.951 $ 726.535 Personnel Summary Total Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992 -93 1993-94 11 11 11 79 DEPARTMENT: ENGINEERING Organizational Chart I Permits City Engineer _ Land Development Encroachment Permits Planning Commission Grading Permits Development Review -- Utilities Permits -- Plan Check -- Special Events Permits -- Map Recordation Bond Releases Street Vacations Develop Land Use Policies & Ordinances 80 DEPARTMENT: NG1NEERING Program: Description: Goals: Key Objectives: Engineering The Engineering Program provides for the review and engineering approvals of all private development within the City to ensure compliance with City Codes, Ordinances and Policies. The Enginee/ing Program prepares technical conditions of approval for development projects, performs the necessary plan cheeks, and public works observations, and recommends the releases of performance bonds upon completion of projects. The Engineering Program is also implementing the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System requirements as mandated under the City of Temecula's Municipal Permit. In addition to developing a Storm Water Management Ordinance, the program reviews existing ordinances and policies to ensure consistency with community objectives. Provide a consistent level of development review, plan check, and public works observation for private development projects to ensure compliance with City codes and regulations. Provide timely information and knowledgeable personnel to address public inquiries and community concern in a manner consistent with City policies. Provide administrative coordination for all Land Development activities and ensure coordination with other departments and agencies. Finalize the implementation of a tracking system to include plan check, permits, and subdivision bonds. Establish a manual of Land Development Policies and Procedures which will more clearly define Public Works Policy for the Land Development Community. Performance Measures: Significant Changes: Perform 350 Plan Checks with an avenge of three checks for each plan. Conduct a total of 5,200 inspections including reinspections. Issue a total of 150 grading, encroachment or special permits. Review twenty-five traffic studies. Addition of Facilities Internal Service Fund. 81 DEPARTMENT: ENGINEFRINQ (Continued) Program: Description: Goats: Key Objectives: Traffic Engineering The Traffic Engineering Program provides staff for the Public traffic/Safety Commission and is responsible for the collection and analysis of traffic volumes, accident reports, speed studies, and traffic deviCe inventories. The Program is also responsible for the maintenance and timing of all existing traffic signals, along with establishing future traffic signal priorities. Provide for timely installation and modification of traffic devices. Provide for a safe and orderly movement of people and goods using the City's Transportation System. Establish a signing and striping inventory. Establish a traffic signal installation priority list. Maintain the City-wide Waf~c census program. Implement an accident reduction program. Implement a City policy on speed undulations. Significant Changes: Transition from Contract Traffic Engineer to staff Traffic Engineer. 82 DEPARTMENT: ENGINEERING Funding Source: General Fund Expenditure Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Personnel $ 181,010 MateriMs &Services 1,103,083 Capital Outlay 525 $ 676,459 $ 692,505 356,178 231,939 29.505 11.500 Total $1.284.618 $1.062.142 $ 935.944 Personnel Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Total 2.75 13.75 12.5 83 DEPARTMENT: POLICE SERVICES Organizational Chart Chief Of Police Investigative Services Special Operations Patrol Services Investigations - School Resources Patrol Unit Special Enforcement - Crime Prevention Community Service Unit K-9 Unit Motorcycle Unit Community Services Traffic · Unit 84 DEPARTMENT: POLICE SERVICES Program: Description: Goals: Key Objectives: Police Services The Temecula Police Department is responsible for the protection of life and property. The Department is orranized into the following divisions, Patrol and Investigations, Traffic, Support Services and Administration. The City contracts with Riverside County Sheriffs Department for Police Provide the citizens of Temecula with a caring, professional, and efficient Police Department. The Department will provide a full service program ranging from clerical support to specialized enforcement programs. Maintain strong community police relations through open communications, professional services, and the continual refinement of the various crime prevention programs. Maintain active involvement with the Public Safety Commission and community groups. Reduce the opportunities for the commission of crimes through proactive law enforcement, crime prevention programs, and citizens involvement. Work cooperatively with other City departments. Maintain the School/Community Resource Officer Program. Utilize Community Service Officers for passive police duties. Enforce applicable municipal codes. Work with City staff and allied agencies with the preparation of a comprehensive disaster plan. Develop and implement a Community Watch Program utilizing senior volunteers. Work closely with the City Attorney to develop an ordinance that will permit the ability to collect for law enforcement costs associated with criminal investigations related to graf~ti. Work with the Finance Department to develop an in-house parking citation processing program and implement same. 85 DEPARTMENT: POLICE SERVICES (Continued) Police Services (Continued) Investigate the feasibility of initiating a program to recover the costs associated with the arrest and prosecution of DUI offenders. Performance Measures: Work to reduce the opportunity for young students to be attracted to gang life styles. This will be accomplished through the efforts of the School/Community Resource Officer. A monthly report will be generated by the officer to review the program efforts. Increase the number of hazardous traffic citations in school and residential zones by 10%, the number of verbal traffic warnings by 15%. Add three additional reserve officers to the department. Perform monthly special enforcement programs to attempt to deter the crime of graf~ti. Work closely with the City Attorney to develop an ordinance that will permit the ability to collect for law enforcement costs associated with criminal investigations related to graf~ti. Maintain a proactive department through the positive feedback with staff assigned to patrol services. Work with Finance Department to develop an in-house parking citation processing program and implement same. Strive to keep the number of reported offenses to last year's levels or lower. Implement "Community Watch" program, staffed by senior volunteers who will perform field support functions to the department's staff. Increase Drivers Under the Influence (DUD arrests by 10%. Investigate the feasibility of initiating a program to recover the costs associated with the arrest and prosecution of DUI offenders. 86 DEPARTMENT: POLICE SERVICES (Continued) Significant Changes: Police Services (Continued) Maintain a proactive department through the positive feedback with staff assigned to patrol services. None 87 DEPARTMENT: POLICE SERVICES FundinZ Source: General Fund Exl~enditure Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Personnel $ 0 Materials & Services 3,590,351 Capital Outlay 17.906 $ 0 $ 0 4,203,314 4,104,315 20.800 0 Total $ 3.608.257 $ 4.224.114 $ 4.104.315 Personnel Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Total 0 0. 0 88 DEPARTMENT: FIRF. SERVICES Organizational Chart Administration Prevention Staff Fire Prevention -- Fire Suppression Fire Education Public Relations Emergency Medical Care Hazardous Materials Planning/Engineering -- Investigation 89 DEPARTMENT: FIRE SERVICES Program: Description: Goals: Key Objectives: Fire Senices The City contracts with the Riverside County Fire Department for all ~r~ services. The department is responsible for maintaining a safe, secure, and healthy environment for all local residents and visitors. Key services are intended to provide progressive, innovative, and cost effective protection of life, property, and natural resources located within the community. Continue to provide a professional, courteous, responsive, and cost effective fire protection service to the community using the most progressive, proven techniques of: Fire Prevention and Education Fire Suppression Fire Investigation Emergency Medical Care Hazardous Material Identification and Mitigation Planning and Engineering Public Relations Maintain high levels of performance through continuous training of fire services personnel. Conduct Fire Safety inspections to ensure safe environments for business owners and patrons in a courteous, cooperative manner. Update and continuously improve street response, and maps proportionate to community growth to ensure fast and efficient responses to all emergencies. Abate dooryard hazards identified as providing potential for serious, uncontrolled fire activity. Practice professionalism, courtesy, and honesty in all dealings with the public and City. 9o DEPARTMENT: FIRE SERVICES (Continued) Fire Services (continued) Performance Measures: Fiscal Year 1993-94 Total Projected Emergency Incidents - 3.310: Fires 350; Hazmat/FMS - 125; Public Service Assists - 150; Medical Aids - 1400; Traffic Collisions - 385; False Alarms - 300; Assists/Covers - 600 Estimated Prevention Inspections: 2,400 inspections requiring 1,017 person hours. Estimated Public Education Contacts: Adult - 18,000; Children 18,500. Significant Changes: Fiscal Year 1992-93 Total l=-mergency Incidents - 3.175: Fires 314; Hazmat/FMS - 122; Public Service Assists - 136; Medical Aids - 1348; Traffic Collisions - 375; False Alarms - 293; Assists/Covers - 587. Annual Prevention Inspections: 2256 inspections expending 952 person hours. Public Education Contacts: Adult- 17,764;.Children- 18,092. Fiscal Year 1991-92 Total Emergency Incidents - 2.948: Fires - 556; HazmatYFMS - 116; Public Service Assists - 201; Medical Aids - 1377; Traffic Collisions - 370; False Alarms - 131; Assists/Covers- 197. Annual Prevention Inspections: 1608 inspections expending 809 person hours. Public Education Contacts: Adult - 6500; Children - 2148. Inclusion of Fire Plan Check and Inspection Program. Addition of revenue and expenditures related to Structural Fire Tax. 91 DEPARTMENT: FIRE SERVICES Funding Source: General Fund F-xpendimre Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Personnel $ 0 Materials &Services 494,345 CapiUtl Outlay 3.553 o $ o 624,043 1,855,052 220.459 3.500 Total $ 497.898 $ 844.502 $1.858.552 Personnel Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Total 0 0 0 92 DEPARTMENT: ANIMAL CONTROL Program: Description: Key Objectives: Animal Control The City contracts for animal control services with the Riverside County Health Department who investigates reports of inhumane treatment of animals; responds to nuisance complaints and stray animal reports; issues citations as appropriate; issues quarantine orders in suspected or possible rabies cases; enforces dog and kennel licensing regulations; collects and impounds stray animals; investigates livestock diseases and zoonosis; collects specimens for laboratory analysis, and provides low cost rabies vaccination clinics for dogs. To ensure a minimum of 80 % of the dog population is vaccinated against rabies. To prevent the outbreak of rabies by enforcement of animal ordinances and quarantine requirements. To reduce uncontrolled breeding. To investigate and attempt to prevent animal nuisances. To assist in investigation and attempt to prevent inhumane treatment of animals. To educate the public on responsible animal ownership. To enforce dog licensing and kennel licensing. To investigate and attempt to prevent dogs killing livestock. To impound stray animals. To provide care and feed for impounded animals. To reunite animals with their owners. To provide adoption services for animals. To dispose of unclaimed and/or unwanted animals by humane euthanasia. -93 DEPARTMENT: ANIMAL CONTROl, (Continued) Program: Animal Control (Continued) Significant Changes: None 94 DEPARTMENT: ANIMAL CONTROL l~unding Source: General Fund Expenditure Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Personnel $ 0 MateriMs &Services 72,317 Capital Outlay 0 $ 0 $ 0 85,920 86,000 0 0 Total $ 72.317 $ 85.920 $ 86.000 Personnel Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Total 0 0 0 95 (This Page Left Blank Intentionally) 96 PUBLIC WORKS GAS TAX AND TRANSPORTATION FUNDS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS Organizational Chart PUBLIC WOlD DIRF, CTOi MAINTINANCE TIAI~PIC INGINIIalNO I CAPITAL PEO,rgCT II I ~DMINISTI~TION _ PAVEMENT MA-qAGml4mfr _ TIAIqqC COMMIIiION CAPITAL IMPROVEMINT PIOGIAM CITY COUNCIL S/GNINGIFFP./PING TREK TRIMMING WEED ABATEMENT __ TRAFFIC CINIUI TIAFIqC DIVIC1 INVB~rORy PliED lUlVlY8 PROJECT DESIGN CONTRACT A/Nt41NiSTRATION CONFIIUCTION MANAGII4INT IFLOOD PLAIN ADMINISTRATION ICTC WRCOG ~ DRAINAGE C]iA~NE!e SPECIAL EVENTS GRAPiI~'I'[ IEMOVAL CONTRACT ADMIN, TIAIrPIC B/GNAL MAJIfl'ENANCI 'FlAPtIC SIGNAL TIMING __ TIAPfiC ANALYSIS; INVESTIGATION __ PUBL/C SlaVICZ __ PARK CONrrilUCTION _ SPKCIALDIE'rR/CTS __ MA]NTINANC] PRO,,'~CT D~iGN PLANNING TASK STA. MARG. WAT~RSHrn TRANSp. DIMAND MANAGLMENT TIMEC1ULA/MT~i. IUITA TitArtIC COMMITTII BUDGET PUBLIC SERVICE REQUESTS _ oxAjrr APPLICATIONS PUBLIC INFORMAT]ON 97 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS Program: Description: Goals: Key Objectives: Administration The Administration Division is responsible for providing coordination with other agencies and organizations involved in transportation, flood control, and water distribution. This Division represents the City at meetings . involving the Riverside County Transportation Commission and the Western Riverside Council of Governments concerning federal funding, air quality, and congestion management. Additionally, the Division is also involved in the Water Planning Task Force, the various Santa Margarita Watershed groups, and the Temecula/Murtieta Traffic Committee. Provide for effective communication between the Land Development, Capital Projects, and Maintenance Divisions. Ensure that regional, state, and federal objectives are being pursued through local policies. Maintain active participation in regional groups. Respond to all appropriate grant applications. Track the Department's budget and coordinate the activities of the Department's various divisions. Maintain the Public Works Department Uniform Filing System. Performance Measures: Significant Changes: Respond to approximately 450 service order requests. Inclusion of Facilities Internal Service Fund. Addition of Assistant Engineer (TCSD Funded) in Capital Projects. Addition of one Office Assistant. 98 DEPARTMENT: PUBI,IC WORKS (_Continued) Program: Description: Goals: Key Objectives: Capital Projects The Capital Projects Program is responsible for the timely implementation of civil engineering projects and park construction projects within the City's adopted Capital Improvement Program. The Program prepares the initial. cost estimates and constraints of conceptual projects, prepares requests for proposals to hire the necessary consultants, reviews and approves all consultant plans, conducts the public bidding process; coordinates with other City Departments, utility companies and government agencies; and performs construction administration and inspection. The MEter Planning and Conceptual Design of all City parks is directed through the Temecula Community Services District and transferred to the Capital Projects Program for preparation of the plans and specifications and subsequent construction. Provide timely planning, design, and construction of public infrastructure consistent with public need and economic feasibility. Provide timely information and knowledgeable personnel to address public inquiries and community concern in a manner consistent with City Policies. Implement the Capital Improvement Program. Obtain the maximum amount of federal funds available to the City under current state and federal legislation. 99 r}EPARTMF. NT; PT I.TC WORKS (Continued) Description: Goals: Key Objectives: The Maintenance Division of the Public Works Department is responsible for all maintenance activities associated with the City's streets, drainage facilities, traffic control devices, sweet trees and parkways. The two Maintenance Workers in this Division install all new and replacement signs, clean all City catch basins, set out traffic counters, fill potholes, and clear existing rights-of-way as needed. The larger maintenance projects that require significant manpower and specialized equipment, such as street resurfacings, street striping, storm drain line cleaning, signal maintenance, tree trimming, and weed spraying, are administered by this Division through individual contracts. Additionally, with the increased staff and equipment included in this budget, this Division will be responsible for graf~fl removal within the City.. Utilize the most cost-effective means for achieving the proper maintenance of City infrastructures. Provide administrative coordination of all the City's maintenance contractors. Create a proactive maintenance program to minimize the disruption to the public and maximize the useful life of the infrastructure. Provide timely information and knowledgeable personnel to address public inquiries and community concerns. Provide for timely installations and modifications of traffic controls as directed by City Council. Implement the Pavement Management System and establish a priority list for street maintenance. Reduce the installations. facilities. lead time to implement maintenance requests or new Establish an annual maintenance program for drainage Repalnt existing traffic markings and lane sWiping twice each year. Remove graffiti within 48 hours of notification. 100 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS (Continued) Program: Maintenance (Continued) Performance Measures: Fill over 7,000 square feet of potholes throughout the City. Trim appwximately 150 trees. Clear approximately 360,000 square feet of weeds from roadways. 101 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS Expenditure Summary Funding Source: Gas Tax/General Fund/ Local Transportation Fund Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Personnel $ 372,283 Materials & Sewices 1,085,591 Capital Outlay 30.369 512,181 $ 726,262 1,364,756 1,276,088 24.710 5.000 Total $1.488.243 $1.901.647 $ 2.007.350 Personnel Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Total 9.25 9.25 12.S 102 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DEPARTMENT: COMMIfNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Organizational Chart Community Services Development Services Park _ Park _ Youth & Maintenance Acquisition Adult Sports -- Median -- Park Maintenance -- Special Devel opm ent Eve nts -- Slope -- Assessment -- Volunteer & Maintenance Administration Cultural Services -- Development Review Teen & Recreation Services -- Senior & Human Services 103 DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES Pro~ram: Description: Goals: Key Objectives: Temecula Community Services District The Community Services District is responsible for providing three primary functions: (a) recreation services, (b) development services, and (c) landscape services. The Community Services District is governed by the Board of Directors (City Council), who direct the programs, services, and capital development to be provided to the Citizens of Temecula. Provide a comprehensive, balanced recreation program that meets the needs of all age groups and interests within the community. Expand recreation. opportunities through the acquisition, development of new park facilities, and the rehabilitation of existing facilities. Develop proactive maintenance procedures to parks, slopes, medians, and street lights to provide a safe, attractive environment for community recreation and enjoyment. Manage operation and maintenance of new .and existing parks and recreation facilities consistent with the recreation requirements of the City's population. Complete construction of the Community Recreation Center, Senior Center, and several neighborhood and community park sites. Expand recreation program to provide a wide variety of senior citizen programs, special events, and excursions. Performance Measures: Recreation Coordinate and implement eight special events. Coordinate and implement two, fifteen week adult softball leagues, and two softball tournaments. Develop, coordinate, and implement fourteen City-wide excursions. Develop, coordinate, and implement a ten week Youth Summer Day Camp Program. 104 DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES (Continued) Temecula Community Services District (Continued) Performance Measures: Maintenance Provide administration, and inspection for landscape maintenance contracts covering eight parks, 112 acres, and sixty acres of slopes and medians. Provide complete maintenance of seventeen City vehicles. Complete capital improvements to park facilities with twelve projects identified in FY 1993-94 Capital Improvement Program. Significant Changes: Expansion of operation and maintenance responsibilities for several new parks and recreation facilities, including the Senior Citizens Center (open summer 1993), and Community Recreation Center (open fall 1993) added into the City's park system. Addition of Facilities Internal Service Fund. Addition of two Maintenance Workers for graf~ti removal and street stenciling in Service Level A. 105 DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICRS- CITY WID~ Operation and mainmance, improvements and administration of the City Community Park System, recreation facilities, services and programs. Funding Source: Community Services District Assessments ~-xpendimre Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Personnel $ 640,366 $ 688,600 $ 804,927 Materials &Services 813,481 1,248,884 1,303,064 Capital Outlay 223,081 7,620 42,000 Debt Service 0 505.000 505.000 Total $1.676.928 $ 2.450.104 $ 2.654.991 Personnel Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Total 16 14 14 106 DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES - LEVEL A Service, operation, maintenance, energy improvements and administration for all Arterial street lighting and medians. Funding Source: Community Services District Assessments Expenditure Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Personnel $ 9,482 $ 16,776 $ 84,291 Materials & Services 358,557 138,000 177,026 Capital Outlay 0 0 50,200 Total $. 368.039 $ 154.776 $ 311.517 Personnel Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Total 0 .45 2.45 107 DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITy SERVICES - LEVEl, B Service, operation, maintenance, energy improvements and administration for all local street lighting within recorded subdivisions. Funding Source: Community Services District Assessments l:-xpenditure Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Personnel $ 11,590 $ 26,432 $ 26,253 Materials & Services 120,567 166,218 165,512 Capital Oufiay 0 0 0 Total $ 132.157 $ 192.650 $ 191.765 Personnel Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Total 0 1 1 108 DEPARTMF-NT: COMMUNITY SF, RVICF, S - LEVEL C Service, operation, mRintenance, improvements and administration for all perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance within recorded subdivisions. This Service Area has four specific rate Funding Source: Community Services District Assessments Expenditure Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Personnel $ 58,590 $ 62,173 $ 68,952 Materials & Services 309,623 420,324 353,849 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 Total $ 368.213 $ 482.497 $ 422.801 Personnel Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Total 0 1.55 .1.55 109 DF-PARTM~,NT: COMMUNITY SF, RVICES - LEVI~,I, D Recycling program and refuse collection for all detached, single-family residential homes. Funding Source: Community Services District Assessments Expenditure Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Personnel $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Materials & Services 841,993 1,319,628 1,419,000 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 Total $ 841.993 $1.319L628 $1.419.000 Personnel Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Total 0 0 0 110 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS - FACILITIES Funding Source: Charges to City and Community Services District Expenditure Summary Personnel Materials & Services Capital Outlay Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 55,873 0 420,424 0 0 Total $ 0 $ 0 $ 476.297 Personnel Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Total 0 0 2 .111 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS - INSURANCF, Funding Source: Charges to City and Community Services District Expenditure Summary Personnel Materials & Services Capital Outlay Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 $ 0 119,134 0 $ 26,034 $ 26,617 170,000 172,500 0 0 Total $ 119.134 $ 196.034 $ 199.117 Personnel Summary Total Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 0 .5 .5 112 INTERNAL SERVICE FITNDS - VEHICLES Fundin~ Source: Charges to City and Community Services District Expenditure Summary Personnel Materials & Services Capital Outlay Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 96,436 109,661 0 0 Total $ 96.436 $ 109.661 Personnel Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Total 0 0 0 113 INTERNAL SERVICe, FUNDS -INFORMATION SYSTEMS Funding Source: Charges to City and Community Services District Expenditure Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992 -93 1993 -94 Personnel $ 0 $ 52,024 $ 63,680 Materials & Services 0 303,321 300,346 Capital Outlay 0 45.900 0 Total $ 0 $ 401.245 $ 364.026 Personnel Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Total 0 1 1 114 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS - COPY CENTER Funding Source: Charges to City and Community Services District Expenditure Summa~ Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Personnel $ 0 $ 60,950 $ 29,841 Materials & Services 0 97,977 89,173 Capital Outlay 0 3.057 0 Total $ 0 $ 161.984 $ 119.014 Personnel Summary Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Total 0 2 1 115 (This Page Left Blank Intentionally) 116 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT AG ,NCY Program: Description: Low/Modmte Income Housing To provide public facilities and other types of housing assistance to low and moderate income citizens. Goals: To purchase low to moderate housing and provide quality housing opportunities for those with low to moderate income. Key Objectives: Coordinate project development and monitor progress of projects to insure compliance with all I-IUD regulations. Significant Changes: None 117 REDEVEI-OPMENT AGENCY (Continued) Program: Description: Goals: Key Objectives: Debt Service The Debt Service Program is the operating budget for the RDA. Items budgeted for include debt service on bonds, administration costs, economic development, and various material and services expenses. To enhance the existing character and economic foundation of the project area and the surrounding community. Provide economic growth opportunities through economic development programs. Pay for debt service on bonds. Provide a vehicle for reimbursement of administrative expenses relating to RDA. Significant Changes: None 118 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LOW/MODERATE INCOME HOUSING Revenue Actual 1991-92 Budgeted 1992-93 Tax Increment $ 366.211 $ 580.142 Proposed 1993-94 $1.304.325 Expenditures Low/Moderate Income Housing Total Expenditures $ 366.211 $ 366.211 $ 580.142 $ 580.142 $ 405.000 $ 405.000 -119 REDEVE~,OPMENT AGENCY- DEI~T SF-RVICE Revenue Tax Increment Actual Budgeted Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 $1.831.056 $. 2.900.708 $1.956.487 Expenditures Debt Service $ Operation and Maintenance ERAF (See Note) Total Expenditures $ 0 $1,600,000 0 0 0 0 $ 1,447,408 420,925 50.OO0 0 $1.600.000 $1.918.333 Note: Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) (Section 33681 of the Health & Safety Code) 120 COMMUNITy DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT Description: The Department of Housing and Urban Development (I-IUD) annually allocates monies for Cities to use for specific projects in their community. Goals: To most effectively utilize all CDBG funds for the betterment of the community. Key Objectives: Coordinate project development and monitoring progress of projects to ensure compliance with all HUD requirements. Revenue FY 1991-92 FY 1992-93 FY 1993-94 $175.000 $126.000 $172.660 PrOjects $175.000 $126.000 $172.660 121 Crhis Page Left Blank Intentionally) 122 BUDGET REFERENCE MATERIAL GLOSSARY OF TERMS ADOPTION - Formal action by the City Council which sets the spending limits for the fiscal year. .APPROPRIATION- A legal authorization granted by the City Council to make expenditures and recur obligations for specific purposes. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) - Annual appropriations in the City's budget for capital purposes such as street improvements, building construction, and park improvements. CONTINGENCY - A budgetary reserve set aside for emergency or unanticipated expenditures. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - Contracts for professional services. EDUCATIONAL REVENUE AUGMENTATION FUND (ERAF) - Section 33681 of the Health and Safety Code. FISCAL YEAR - The period designated by the City for the beginning and ending of financial transactions. The fiscal year begins July 1 and ends June 30. FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS (FTE) - The mount of time a position has been budgeted for in terms of the amount of time a regular, full-time employee normally works in a year. Most full- time employees are paid for 2,080 hours in a year. FUND - An accounting entity with a set of self-balancing revenue and expenditure accounts used to record the financial affairs of a governmental organization. FUND BALANCE - The difference between the assets (revenues and other resources) and liabilities (expenditures incurred or committed to) for a particular fund. OBJECTS OF EXPENDITURE - The individual expenditure accounts used to record each type of expenditure City operations incur. For budgeting purposes, objects of expenditure are categorized into groups of similar types of expenditures called major objects of expenditure. The principai objects of expenditure used in the budget are: PERSONNEL COSTS - Salaries and benefits paid to City employees. Includes items such as special duty salaries and retirement. OPERATING COSTS - Office supplies and other matetiffs used in the normal operations of City departments. Includes items such as books, maintenance matetiffs, and contractual services. CAPITAL OUTLAY - Expenditures which qualify as capital costs according to accounting standards. This includes furniture, fixtures, machinery, equipment, and other relatively minor fixed assets. 123 GLOSSARY OF TF, RMS (Continued) OPERATING BUDGET - Day-to-day costs of delivering City services. PROGRAMS/DEPARTI~NTS - The budget organizes depamnental expenditures into functional areas called programs. RESOURCES - Total amounts available for appropriation including estimated revenues, fund transfers, and beginning balances. 124 DESCRIPTION OF FUNDS The City of Temecuh revenues and expenditures are accounted for in a series of funds. Each fund is an autonomous accounting entity, established in accordance with legal and professional accounting standards. Funds are used to segregate the various financial activities of a governmental entity and to demonstrate compliance with specific reguh~ons, restrictions or limitations; (for example, demonstrating that restricted revenues are spent only for allowed purposes). Funds used in government are classified into three broad categories: governmental, proprietary and fiduciary. Governmental funds include activities usually associated with a typical state or local government's operations (public safety, general government activities, etc.). Proprietary funds are used in government to account for activities often found in the private sector (utilities, stadiums and golf courses are prime examples). Fiduciary funds are utilized in situations where the government is acting in a fiduciary capacity as a trustee or agent. The following funds are utilized by the City of Temecula: Governmental Funds General Fund: This is the general operating fund for the City, utilized to account for all resources not required to be accounted for in another fund. Speci~ Revenue Funds Community Services District: A benefit assessment is charged to property owners within the District (City) to provide recreation, park development, street lighting, and landscape maintenance. Gas Tax Fund: The City maintains the fund to account for the Highway User's Tax revenues received from the State of California under sections 2105, 2107 and 2107.5 of the Streets and Highways Code. Section 2107.5 revenues may only be spent for street and highway purposes. Local Transportation Fund: The City maintains the fund to account for Local Transportation and Measure A funds to be used for construction and improvement of major streets and for fixed route transient facilities. Redevelopment Agency: The activities of the Redevelopment Agency are accounted for in a separate fund. Twenty percent of the properly tax increment must be reserved for Low/Moderate Income Housing Set Aside. Community Development Block Grants (CDBG): Funds allocated to local government from the federal government, through RiveBide County Economic Development Corporation, based on a formula, but required to be applied for and required to be used within a broad functional area such as community development. 125 DESCRIPTION OF FUNDS (Continued) Internal Service Funds Facilities: This Internal Service Fund was developed to charge departments the cost of rent and maintenance for City Hall. Insurance: This Internal Sexyice Fund was established to fund the City's liability and property insurance premium costs. This fund aim includes 25 % of the salaries of the staff re, spo~ble for the program, namely the Senior Management Analyst and Administrative Secretary, both in the Finance Department. Vehicles: This Internal Service Fund was created to fund operations and maintenance costs and to depreciate vehicles on a three year life span. Depreciating vehicles will create a fund balance for the purchase of future replacement vehicles. Information Systems: This Internal Service Fund was developed to fund computers and telephones operating and maintenance expense and to depreciate all computer and telephone equipment on a three year cycle. This depreciation will create a fund balance for the purchase of future replacement computers and telephones. The salary and benefits for the Network Administrator is included in this fund~ Copy Center: The Copy Center includes all costs associated with the Copy Center and all related copier equipment in the City. This fund includes the salaries and benefits for the Duplicating Technician and for the Facility Technician. 126 SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING PRINCIPI-ES Fund Accounting The accounts of the City are organized on the basis of funds and account groups, each of which is considered a separate accounting entity. The operations of each fund arc accounted for with a separate set of self-balancing accounts that comprise its assets, liabilities, fund equity, revenues and expenditures. Government resources are allocated to and accounted for in individual funds based upon the purposes for which they arc to be spent and the means by which spending activities are controlled. The various funds arc grouped into generic fund types and broad fund categories as follows: Governmental Funds: General Fund Special Revenue Fund Capital Projects Fund Fiduciary Fund: Agency Fund Internal Service Funds: Facilities Insurance Vehicles Information Systems Copy Center Accounting Basis All governmental funds and the agency fund are accounted for using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Their revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available as net current assets. The primary revenue sources susceptible to accrual are property, sales and cigarette taxes, investment income, federal entitlements, motor vehicle fees and gas lax subventions. Sources not susceptible to accrual are uniform transient' occupancy taxes and franchise fees. Expenditures are generally recognized under the modified accrual basis of accounting when the related fund liability is incurred. An exception to this general rule is principal and interest due on general long-term debt which is recognized when due. Encumbrance accounting, under which purchase orders, contracts, and other commitments for the expenditure of funds are recorded in order to reserve that portion of the applicable appropriation, is employed in the governmental funds. Open encumbrances are recorded as reservation of fund balance since the commitments will be paid by subsequent years budget appropriations. Encumbrances do not constitute expenditures or liabilities. 127 EXPI ANATION OF MAIOR REVF-NI,m, SOURCES General Fund Property Tax: is determined by the Riverside County Tax Assessor based on the full value of a property. The County levis a base tax of one percent of assessed valuation plus assessments. Approximately 11 to 13 percent of the County levy is subvented to the City. Sales and Use Taxes: the State of California imposes a six percent (six and one-quarter percent through December 1990) sales tax on a taxable sales in the City. The City receives one percent of the six percent collected. Franchises: fees are imposed on ambulance, gas, electric and cable television companies operating in the City ranging from one to five percent of gross receipts. Property Transfer Tax: the County imposes a transfer tax on real property mid based on the value of the property transferred. This tax is evenly allocated between the County and the City. Transient Occupancy Tax: the City levies an eight percent tax on the rents collected by a hoteYmotel located within the City limits. Licenses and Permits: the City assesses certain license and permit fees as a means of recovering the cost of regulating various activities. The fees are paid by individuals and developers receiving permits for construction activities requiring permits. Intergovernmental Revenues: are revenues collected by the state of California and then subvented to the City according to formulas established by hw. Charges for Services: service charges or fees are imposed on the user for a specific service rendered based on the rationale that the bene~tting party should bear the cost of the service rather than the general public. Fines and Forfeitures: frees and penalties are imposed for traffic and parking viohtions occurring within the City limits and local ordinance infractions. The revenues are collected and distributed to the City by the Riverside County Court System less an administrative overhead cost. Interest Revenue: the City pools its available cash and invests in instruments as allowed in the City's investment policy. 128 EXPLANATION OF MAJOR REVENUF, SOURCES Other Funds Gas Tax Funds: the State of California assesses a tax on gasoline purchases as authorized by Sections 2106, 2107 and 2107.5 of the California SU'eets and Highways Cede. A portion of this tax is allocated to the City based on a formula established by law. These funds are earmarked for the maintenance, rehabilitation or improvement of public streets. Transportation Funds: State and County funding is provided for the construction and improvement of major streets, and for the development of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Assessment: the Community Services District levies a charge on real property to provide park maintenance, street lighting, slope maintenance, waste hauling, and City-wide recreation programs. · 129 (This Page Left Blank Intentionally) 130 ITEM NO. 9 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FIN~d~CE OFFICER CITY F,~I~AGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 22,1993 SUBJECT: BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB PROJECT PREPARED BY: ~ SHAWN D. NELSON, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR MARY JANE MCLARNEY, FINANCE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Authorize City Manager to execute a loan agreement of $374,846 with the Boys and Girls Club for construction of the Boys and Girls Club Facility. DISCUSSION: On April 13, 1993, the City Council approved funding in the amount of $374,846 for the Boys and Girls Club Project. In doing so, the Council directed staff to prepare a loan agreement with the Boys and Girls Club that identifies the terms of the loan repayment and provides a provision for the City to assume the lease of the property with the Temecula Town Association if the Boys and Girls Club defaults on the loan. Also, the Council directed staff to analyze the feasibility of the Play and Learn School (PALS) program utilizing the Boys and Girls Club Facility during the morning hours when the Club is not operating. On June 15, 1993, representatives from the 'Boys and Girls Club met with the ad hoc committee for this project, Pat Birdsall and Jeff Stone, and city staff. After considerable discussion, terms for the loan agreement were agreed upon to recommend to the City Council. However, on June 16, 1993, staff was informed by representatives from the PALS program that Nicolas Elementary School was now available for their use. Therefore, PALS would no longer need to utilize the Boys and Girls Club Facility for their program. As a result, the following are the terms agreed upon by the ad hoc committee to recommend to the City Council: The monthly payment for the Boys and Girls Club Facility will be 93,078 per month for twenty (20) years at 7.8%. 0 Pursuant to the terms of the loan agreement, the Boys and Girls Club will receive a maximum of a 100% credit towards the monthly loan payments through service programming hours of 91.05 per child per hour for the first year. For the second year, the Boys and Girls Club will pay 9800 per month toward the monthly payment. For the third and fourth years, the monthly payment to the City will increase to 91 ,O00. Beginning with the fifth year through the remainder of the loan, the Boys and Girls Club will pay 91,500 per month. The balance of these monthly payments will be offset by a credit for service programming hours. The Boys and Girls Club will provide an annual financial statement to the City. The Boys and Girls Club will provide a quarterly report concerning program participation levels. If the Boys and Girls Club defaults on the loan payments, the City will assume the lease terms for the property. The City Attorney will prepare the loan agreement with the Boys and Girls Club if the terms are approved by the City Council. FISCAL IMPACT: Total loan amount is 9374,846 for twenty (20) years at 7.8%. This amount includes all previously approved loans. The monthly payment is 93,078. The loan will be repaid by the Boys and Girls Club receiving a maximum credit of 100% of the.. monthly payment in service programming hours at 91.05 per hour per child for the first year. Beginning with the second year, the monthly payment will be $800. For the third and fourth years, the monthly payment will be 91,000. Beginning With year five through the balance of the loan, the monthly payment will be 91,500 per month. APPROVAT. CITY ATTORNEY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council Shawn Nelson Director of Community Services June 22, 1993 Item No. 9 - Boys and Girls Club Funding City Clerk June S. Greek Authorize the City Manager to execute a loan agreement of $374,846 with the Boys and Girls Club for construction of the Boys and Girls Club Facility. BACKGROUND: The staff will finalize a staff report on this item and forward it to you under separate cover. JSG ITEM NO. 10 APPROVAL CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 22, 1993 SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: ~¢~ RECOMMENDATION: FRIENDSHIP BASEBALL TOURNAMENT REQUEST SHAWN D. NELSON, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR That the City Council: Deny request of a $1,400 grant for a youth traveling baseball team from Temecula to participate in the Friendship Baseball Tournament in Danvers, Massachusetts. DISCUSSION: Staff received a request from organizers from Temecula Valley and Temecula National Little Leagues to field a "Tournament Team" to participate in a Friendship Baseball Tournament in Danvers, Massachusetts on August 12 through 19, 1993. This team will consist of eleven and twelve year old boys who currently participate in both Little Leagues in Temecula. Parents have raised enough money to cover all expenses except for uniforms and equipment costs. Because this event is not a Little League sanctioned event, this tournament team can not use Little League's uniforms and equipment. Therefore, the organizers of this tournament team have requested that the City grant $1,400 to purchase the uniforms and necessary equipment for the tournament. The City would retain the uniforms and equipment once the tournament is completed, which could be reused for future activities. Staff is recommending denial of this request for two reasons: a) this request does not meet the City's Community Service Funding Guidelines because this tournament team is not affiliated with a non-profit organization as this tournament is not sanctioned by Little League, and b) the City would incur additional liability for the trip and the event which is not covered by Little League's liability insurance. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Temecula City Manager's Office c/o Dave Dixon 43174 Business Park Dr. Temecula, Ca. 92590 Dear Mr Dixon: I would like to request that I be added to the agenda of the June 22nd council meeting. Temecula has been invited to participate in a Friendship Baseball Tournament in Danvers, Massachusetts. The team has. been selected, airline tickets bought and accommodations secured, however expenses which the parents cannot afford still exist. We are hopeful that the City of Temecula will deem this event worthy of support. Very Truly Yours, Frit Swain Assistant Team Organizer 45470 Tournament Ln. Temecula, Ca. 92592 ~ (909) 694-5000 HM (909) 699-0860 City of Temecula c/o Temecula City Council 43174 Business Park Dr. Temecula, Ca. 92590 May 26, 1993 Dear Council Members: The City of Temecula has been offered the opportunity to participate in a Friendship Baseball Tournament in Danvers Massachusetts which is just outside of Boston. Rod Guilmain has been instrumental in negotiating the terms of the tournament and organizing a team which will represent Temecula. This "Tournament Team" will be made up of eleven and twelve year old boys who currently participate in the Temecula Valley and Temecula National Little Leagues. Enclosed you will find a letter of invitation from the Danvers Little League outlining their desire for a California team to participate in their tournament. The Temecula Tournament Team will have many expenses most of which will be covered by the parents of the players. Enclosed is an outline of the expenses which will be accrued for this event. We were hoping that the Temecula Little Leagues would allow us to use their equipment and uniforms for this tournament, however, since the tournament is not Little League sanctioned this would be prohibited. I would like to request that the City of Temecula sponsor this team by furnishing uniforms which have the name Temecula and city logo patch on them and also allow us to give Temecula City pins to the players of opposing teams after each game. The Temecula Tournament Team uniforms would not be kept by the players but would be stored for use in future tournaments. Temecula teams have opportunities on a yearly basis to attend area tournaments which means these uniforms would get plenty of use as Temecula Tournament Teams go out of town to participate in these games. If you have tracked Temecula youth baseball in the past you would realize how well represented our city is in these tournaments. I have also enclosed a schedule of the Friendship Tournament. The teams we will be playing against are made up of Little Leagues from the cities listed. As the tournament progresses our standings will be monitored by The Californian and by the KRTMradio station. The local news media in and around Danvers will also be promoting the Friendship Tournament which should give Temecula some excellent coverage. It will mean quite a lot to the team to have the sponsorship of the City of Temecula. We need your support so that Temecula can put its best foot forward in this step across the nation. Our hopes are that Temecula will be well represented in The Friendship Tournament. Very Truly Yours, Frit Swain Assistant Team Organizer 45470 Tournament Ln. Temecula, Ca. 92592 WK (909) 694-5000 HM (909) 699-0860 FRIENDSHIP TO~ EI'PENBEB UNIFORMS .................................... $1,000 EQUIPMENT .................................... $400 FOOD ......................................... $1300 LODGING ...................................... $2600 PLANE FARE ................................... $3900 RED SOX GAME ................................. $100 TOTAL EXPENSES $93oo FRIENDBHIP TO~ BCHEDULE AUGUST 12th AUGUST 12th AUGUST 13th AUGUST 14th AUGUST 14th AUGUST 16th AUGUST 17th AUGUST 18th AUGUST 19th AUGUST 19th OPENING CEREMONY TEMECULA vs DANVERS TEMECULAvs SALEM BEVERLY vs TEMECULA TEMECULA vs WEST PEABODY GLOUCESTER vs TEMECULA TEMECULA vs SWAMPSCOTT LYNN vs TEMECULA DANVERS vs TEMECULA CLOSING CEREMONY W/BAR-B-QUE MARINE COLOR GUARD 5:30pm 7:'00pm ll:00am 6:00pm 5:30pm 5:30pm 5:30pm 5:30pm Thursday, May 6, 1993 Ginny Rund Temec~ula Valley Little League 31354 Corte Talvera Temecula, CA. 92592 Dear Ginny: On behalf of the Danvers American Little League, I would like to take this opportunity to invite members of the Temecula Valley Little LeagUe and their families for a week of baseball and hospitality. The proposed dates would be approximately August 1 lth thru August 20th, 1993. The timing is good because it happens to be just before the annual Salem tournament that many of the teams in the area participate in and are practicing for at this time. !t will also provide some strong competition, for these are not the ordinary teams that enter the Little League Tournament. What we do is combine teams from each city or town participating to make the strongest team to represent that town. For example, we take the best players from the Danvers American and the National Leagues to make one team. This is done by each and every team in this particular tournament. As you might guess it is not sanctioned by Little League Baseball. Unfortunately, because of insurance reasons, neither are the games I would be setting up for your team to participate In. Attar. l'lnallzing and firruing the dates with Rod Gilmaine, I will contact a number of the teams and fill in the dates that you request. Although our climate doesn't enable us to play quite as much baseball as we would like to sometimes, this tournament will provide excellent competition as well as an opportunity to make some new friendships. And to me, this is the best part of all. I will try to get a night game or two at the parks that have lights in the area and these are not only lit parks but very fine fields to play on. Most of the games will take place at our horns field which is the ,elan Brown Field at Plains Park. We take great pride in the hard work our volunteers do to keep this field in great shape and even though it is the end of our season. it will be in top form for your visit. A great deal of credit has to go to Rod Giimaine with your league and his brother-in-law Mike Marcheterre out here for coming up with this idea. We are ,--- going to promote it as a Tournament of Friendship, and plan on publicizing quite heavily to encourage people from the area to come out and see' some excellent Little League baseball. Again, I want thank you for this opportunity and look forward to a.n outstanding time in August. League President DIAMOND (C,e=timsed Item Ps~e 1) league would come out to a field teams', the Babe Ruth League, the that was located near the site of American Legion team, and the the present diamond, to get in North Shore League baseball some baseball before sundown. team. The games served as the town's ~ Sports and recreation oiTlcials main gathering spot. during the': say hardly a day goes by in the 1940s and'50s.' . ~.'-!:;.j;,'- summer when the field is not "I remember we would go When'~ used.. we visited our grandparents;'. They used to have the bleachers set up and they would play before it got dark in the summertime;' ' said town'. archivist Richar Trask. "And they would' pass titde''' hat at some time before the game for contributions to the league." Ttie Twi-Light Field was ' moved to its current location in 1968 and ,flood lights were in- stalled soon afterward. The field was given a major overhaul in 1986, when Schmidgall and his team installed sprinklers',. shaped the field for better drain- age, re-sod the in~eld, and added benches and fencing with a $25,000 Town Meeting appropria- tion. And within the last five years, the RotarY Club added a $5,000 batting' cage, . another group of residents donated the .scoreboard and Town Meeting appropriated additional monies for new bleachers. Though the Twi-Light League. died out, Danvers has remained a baseball town with the field at its' denter. The diamohd now serves as home to .the Danvers High School varsity and ju,nior varsity ~,, "Without a doubt it's the best 'field on the North Shore. N.C. No Competition," said CrowIcy. "It's been a labor of love for Jack Sch- midgall and the people in the Park Department. and Public Works Department. And there's been a lot of citizen involvement as well." Crowle~ said the field is the envy of.others on the North Shore. '" "There are a lo~ of teams that want to play on the Twi Field," .said CrowIcy, who also comple- mented Schmidgall's crew on the town's other ballfields. "Every- time there's a state tournament, people from all Over Massachu- setts who come are in a.w.e of the field." · "EverYone that plays us in baseball says what a great field it is -- the layout, the diamond, the dugouts ... we even have a batting cage," added Danvers High School athletic director Ernest Smith. "We're lucky to have a fa- aility like that. If you go down there in the summer, that place is going almost every night of the week." " TEHECUL~ VALLEY LITTLE LEAGUE Wednesday May 19,1993 Ron Burton Community Relations 4 Yawkey Way Boston, Ma. 02215 Dear Ron, Pursuant to our conversation on May 14th, I am sending this memo to request your help during our visit to Fenway Park on. August 15, 1993. As we discussed, I am bringing a select group of Little League baseball players to Massachusetts from California during the 11-22nd of August time frame. These players will participate in an eight game tournament sponsored by the Danvers American Little League. To make this event more special for our players, we have purchased tickets for the RED SOX vs TORONTO game scheduled for August 15th at Fenway Park. To make this event as unique as possible, I am requesting your help. Specifically, I would like to bring approximately thirty Little Leaguers to the ballpark early on August 15th in order to meet the Toronto and Red Sox players and to observe batting practice prior to the l:05pm contest. Additionally, any suggestion you might have which would make this day a lifelong memory for these players would be greatly appreciated. I am enclosing a copy of the memo which- outlines our participation in the Tournament of Friendship. I look forward to future Correspondence. My home address, work fax, and contact numbers are listed below. Sincerely, Rod Guilmain 31354 Corte Talvera Temecula, Ca. 92592 1-900-699-0919 WK FAX 1-619-939-5744 WK PHN 1-619-939-5436 ITEM NO. I 1 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROV~,i. CITY ATTORNEy ~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY .MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA A GENDA REPORT City Council David F. Dixon June 22, 1993 Request from the Temecula Valley Museum RECOMMENDA T/ON: It is recommended that the City Council consider a request from the Temecula Valley Museum to provide them with support, on an interim basis, until a resolution can be found and agreed upon for a permanent museum facility. STAFF REPORT: Attached you will find a letter dated April 29, 1993 from Nancy J. Maurice requesting that the City Council consider supporting the Temecula Valley Museum with $30,000 to be used toward current annual rent. At the Museum's request they have reduced this request to $15,000 for six months pending the selection of a Permanent site. The City Council provided the Museum with support over the past several years in the form of a subsidy to cover rent. Last September the City voted to assist the Museum through June 30, 1993 with rent assistance. The Museum is once again requesting a renewal of that commitment for half of fiscal year 93-94. The Temecula Valley Museum is an important ingredient in the history of the city and, although it has broad sponsorship and support, it does not have adequate funding for a Permanent location or sufficient revenue to cover rent for the existing facility. It has been the hope of the staff that a decision on a more Permanent location would be forthcoming and we hope that through the adoption of the Capital Improvement Plan a solution might be found for the housing of the Museum. FINANCIAL IMPACT: During the past three years the City has provided a $22,200 loan and $42,500 in grants to the Museum. If funding is desired, it will be necessary to appropriate the amount from unreserved fund balance. :i TEMECHLA MUSEUM _April 29, 1993 Mr.--David Dixon City Manager, City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive' Temecula, CA 92590 Dear Mr. Dixon, As President of the Board of Directors for the Temecula Valley Museum, my Board and I are responsible for the immediate urgency of keeping a roof over our heads, so to speak. As an addendum to our future plans, hopes and dreams as expressed in Jolene's letter to you, we must again ask'the Ciu7 for supporn of our day- to-day operations by paying our rent. I= is my understanding that the City has agreed =o do this, based upon annual review. May this letter serve as a reminder, as the Council and staff work through the budgeting process, ~han the current annual rent for the Musetun is $30,000 per year. Last September, r_he City vo~ed no pay our rent through June 30, 1993. A~ this time I respectfully as =he City to renew this commitr_ment for the fiscal year 93-94. If you have any questions, or require furryher information, please do noc hesitate zo call myself, or any member of the Board of Directors. Sincerely, Nancy J. Maurice, President 41950 MAIN STREET · TE.MECtlLA CA 92590 POST OFFICE BOX' 792 · TEMBCULA CA 92593 909-676-002! 909-676-6329 (CUrATOr) - DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Gary Thornhill, Director of Plann~/~ June 22, 1993 Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File Discussion: The following is a summary of the Planning Department's caseload and project activity for the month of May 1993: Caseload Activity: The department received applications for 17 administrative cases and 4 public hearing cases for the month of May. The following is a breakdown of case type for public hearing items: Extension of Time - Subdivision Plot Plan - Subject to CEQA Parcel Merger 1 2 2 Ongoing Projects: General Plan: To date the Council has reached a consensus on all the elements but housing. That element as well as the Environmental Impact Report and Mitigation Monitoring Program will be discussed at the June 20th City Council meeting. Old Town Soecific Plan: The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Specific Plan at its June 7th meeting. The Plan will be scheduled for City Council review upon completion of the General Plan. French Valley AirPOrt:' The County has received a grant from the Federal Aviation Administration, to prepare the Airport Facility Master Plan for French Valley Airport. The comprehensive Land Use Plan and Master Plan will be developed concurrently. An initial meeting of the steering committee was held in March. R:~S\MONTHLY.RPT~1993~MAy 6116/93 vgw 1 Wal-mart: The Wal-mart Plot Plan, Change of Zone and Tentative Map were heard by the Planning Commission on June 7, 1993. The Commission continued these items to a special Planning Commission meeting on June 21 1993. , Temecula Reaional Center Soecific Plan and Environmental Impact Report: This Specific Plan was presented at a Planning Commission Workshop on May 4, 1992. The Commissioners gave direction to the applicant and staff. This Specific Plan went to a DRC meeting January 5, 1993. Staff is awaiting submittal of additional information. Environmental Impact Report 340 prepared for the Temecula Regional Center was heard by the Planning Commission on June 7, 1993 and continued from that meeting to the Planning Commission meeting of June 21, 1993. Winchester Hills and Camoos Verdes Soecific Plans and Environmental Imoact Reports: These Specific Plans were discussed at a Planning Commission Workshop on May 4, 1992. The Commissioners gave direction to the applicant and staff. The Notice of Completion for the Campos Verdes EIR went to State Clearinghouse July 1 O, 1992. Both of these Specific Plans went to the DRC meetings on January 5, 1993. Staff is awaiting submittal of additional information. Murdv Ranch Soecific Plan and Environmental Imoact RepOrt: This Specific Plan was presented to the Planning Commission at a Workshop on April 6, 1992. The Commission provided Staff and the applicant direction relative to design issues. The applicant has incorporated these changes into the Specific Plan. This Specific Plan will be scheduled for a Planning Commission meeting upon completion of the Development Agreement and the Congestion Management Plan. Johnson Ranch Specific Plan: Staff has met with the applicant and a revised Specific Plan will be submitted. At their June 7, 1993 meeting, the Planning Commission recommended appointed of two Commissioners to sit on a sub- committee to assist in the development of the Specific Plan. Attachment: 1. Count & Valuation Summary by Type - page 3 R:~S\MONTHLY.RPT~1993\MAy 6116193 vgw 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 COUNT & VALUATION SUMMARY BY TYPE R:~S\MONTHLY,RP"r~1993\MAY 6/16193 vgw ~3 REPT155 COUNT & VALUATION SUNNARy BY TYPE PAGE 1 06/07/93 14:31 Subtotat: Cnstr Type NAY 1993 ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ............ .............................................. Types (Select):PLAN ~/P, ~e Construction type Count Sq Feet VaLuation Fees Paid PLANNING CASE EXTENSZON OF TINE-SUBDIV LOT LINE ADJUSTNENT NERGER OF CONT. PARCELS H]NOR OUTDR EVNT-NO CEQA PLOT PLAN SUBJ TO CEQA PLOT PLAN ADNZNZSTRATIVE SUBSTAN CONFORH-GENERAL ZONING LETTER 1 0 .00 358.00 1 0 .00 1,160.00 2 0 .00 2,198.00 2 0 .00 197.00 2 0 .00 7,705.80 11 0 .00 2,090.00 1 0 .00 370.00 1 0 .00 18.00 21 0 .00 '.14,096.80 * TOTAL ** 21 0 ,00 14,096.80 ** APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO.' FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 22, 1993 Public Works Monthly Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached 'for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Report for May, 1993. pwl 5%agdq~t%93%O622~.moactrpt.05 0 0 .o ~ ~ ~ ~i w~z ~W Z O ~ ~ Z Z ~ ~ · ~ ~WOi O ~ ~ Z Z Z ~ Z w M a Z O ~ Z Z~ Z Z ~ W ~ o ~ ~ w~. APPROVAL: CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official June 22, 1993 Building and Safety May, 1993, Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. DISCUSSION: The following is a summary of activity for May, 1993. Building Permits Issued Building Valuation Revenue Collected ...................... ................ 165 .................................... $8,739.169 .... ' ............................... '.. $40,273. Housing Starts ............................................. 54 New Commercial Starts .......................... 4 = 72, 188 Sq. Ft. Commercial Additions/Alterations .. .................. 13 = 11,110 Sq. Ft. Attached you will find a summary of building inspections performed during the past twenty-seven (27) month period. V:'~WP~AGENDA.REP~MAy'93.RFT TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT A.GENDA ITEM 1 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: BOARD OF DIRECTORS FROM: DAVID F. DIXON DATE: JUNE 22, 1993 SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEED FOR JOHN MAGEE PARK - THE PRESLEY COMPANIES PREPARED BY: (~ RECOMMENDATION: BERYL YASINOSKY, DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANT That the Board of Directors: Accept a grant deed from The Presley Companies for John Magee Park, a one-acre neighborhood park within Tract No. 23267-4. DISCUSSION: Pursuant to an agreement between the TCSD and The Presley Companies dated September 30, 1991, the developer is dedicating a one-acre neighborhood park, named John Magee Park, to the City. The park is located between Corte Veranos and Corte Capistrano, just south of Highway 79 South, and includes a tot lot, shade trees, picnic tables, drinking fountain and walkway. This park has been inspected and approved by the T.CSD Maintenance Superintendent. The enclosed grant deed has been reviewed by staff to insure that all legal requirements have been satisfied. A policy of title insurance has also been provided by the developer to accompany the transfer of title to the City. FISCAL IMPACT: Cost of maintaining this park is included within the TCSD Rates and Charges for FY 1993/94 - Community Services, Parks, and Recreation. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Vicinity/Location Map. 2. Grant Deed from The Presley Companies. 081193 L A~C~ ~ PROJECT SITE M . THE PRESLEY COMPANIES Neighborhood Park - Tr. 23267-4 Vicinity/Location Map """ ~TRAC'F 232.67 TRACT 2SB61 · , 44 EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY City of Temecula PER GOV'T CODE § 6103 AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Office of the City Clerk City of Temecula 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE GRANT DEED The undersigned grantor declares: FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, THE PRESLEY COMPANIES, a California corporation, hereby grants to the CITY OF TEMECULA, a body corporate and politic, the following described real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California: Executed on MAY California. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto. 1 ?, , 1993, at SAN DIEGO ,/ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO } Public In and for said State, personally appeared Gerald P. Nordean and John H. Nabors, Jr,, personally known to me (or proved on the basis of sa~sfactory evi~ance) to be the marsons who executed the withi~ inst,'ument as Sr, Vice President and Vice President on behalf of the corporal~on therein named and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the Within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a resolution of its Board of Directors. IN WITNESS THEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, in and for said County and Site, the day and year first above wrmen. THE PRESLEy COMPANIES, a Califo~ corporation FOR NOTARIAL STAMP sig.ature My commission exp~ ~ · ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF On , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature CONSENT The City of Temecula hereby consents to the grant of real property set forth above. City of Temecula BY: J. Sal Munoz, Mayor ATTEST: BY: June S. Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Scott F. Field, City Attorney EXHIBIT "A" Lot 34 of Tract No. 23267-4, as shown by Map on fie in Book 236, pages 21 through 24 of Maps, Records of R/verside County, California. See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. g 29 27 28 30 o,_~.0 32 , 33 28 2,5 ,44'Z3'~ ~OZ.ZT' s \ 3 s~ \ ~' ~ I.oo AC. ~o.b 'J3 12 ,p,o-~; 7 ~: 2 ~,~, SITE '~, '(~) INDICATE5 EXISTING 20' SEWER .j~ ' EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF E,M.W.D. ~ I ~ · PER ~STRUMENT NO. 357140 ~ , RECORDED H-O7-ql, O.R. PA~K SI~ VICINI~ MAP ' ':" ~ ~' o CROSBY Engineers · Planners Surveyors ~ · ~ MEAD 5SSO El Camino Real. Suite 200 BENTON ~' $: ASSOCIATI~I (61g) 438 - 12!0 LOT 34 OF TRACT NO. 23267-4, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 236, PAGES 21 THROUGH 24 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE EXHIBIT "B" ITEM NO. 2 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Prepared by: RECOMMENDATION: entitled: TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT City Manager/Board of Directors Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer June 22, 1993 Fiscal Year 1993-94 Annual Operating Budget Grant M. Yates, Financial Services Administrator That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution 93- RESOLUTION NO. CSD 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING THE ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 FOR THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS AND PERSONNEL POSITIONS DISCUSSION/FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed TCSD operating budget for FY 1993-94 includes the operation of district-wide parks and recreation facilities, as well as benefit assessment zones for street lighting, slope maintenance and graffiti removal. - The operating budget for the TCSD totals $5,000,074 as follows: City Wide Parks and Recreation Service Level A (Arterial Street Lighting) Service Level B (Residential Street Lights} Service Level C (Slope Maintenance) Service Level D (Waste Hauling) $2,654,991 311,517 191,765 422,801 1.419.000 Total $.5.000,074 Public meetings were held on Thursday, June 10, 1993 and Saturday, June 12, 1993 to discuss the proposed rates and charges. A total of three citizens artended these meetings to discuss the proposed rates and charges. All services provided by the TCSD are funded by fees charged to the property owners and are included on the Assessor's Parcel Rolls. The following illustrates the rates as proposed in FY 1993-94. Service Level City-wide Parks & Rec. Service Level A (Arterial Street Lighting) Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting) Service Level C (Slope Maintenance) C1 C2 C3 C4 Service Level D (Waste Hauling) Fv 92-93 Rates FY 93-94 Rates Increase/Decrease $ 58.30 964.20 $ 5.90 ~ 4.18 8 8.28 $ 4.10 $ 30.88 Same $ 0 $ 50.00 Same $ 0 $ 93.00 Same 9 0 9120.00 Same 9 0 · $179.00 Same 9 0 9159.12 965.00 9 5.88 Attachment: 1993-94. Resolution No. CSD 93- Adopting Operating Budget for FY RESOLUTION NO. CSD 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING THE ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993-1994 FOR THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS AND PERSONNEL POSITIONS WHEREAS, the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) has reviewed the proposed final Operating Budget for fiscal year 1993-94, and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEr} by the Temecula Community Services District as follows: SECTION 1. That certain document now on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Temecula enti~ed "City of Temecula 1993-94 Annual Operating Budget," is hereby adopted. SECTION 2. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget appropriations: A. No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered appropriation available to cover the expenditure. B. The Department Head may prepare a transfer of appropriations within departmental budget accounts up to $10,000 per transfer, with the approval of the TCSD General Manager. $10,000. action. C. The General Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in amountS up to Any expenditure of funds in excess of $10,000 requires TCSD Board of Directors D. The Board of Directors must authorize transfers of funds from unreserved Fund Balance and transfers within departmental budget accounts of $10,0013 or more. E. The Board of Directors must authorize any increase in regular personnel positions above the level included in the final budget. The Executive Director may authorize the hiring of temporary or pan time staff as necessary within the limits imposed by the controls listed above. CSDResoo~.08 06116/93 F. Notwithstanding Section 2C, pursuant to Section 3.13.080 of the Municipal Code, the General Manager may authorize Public Works contracts in mounts up to $25,000. Any expenditures of Public Works funds in excess of $25,000 require Board action, except that the General Manager may approve change orders on. Public Works contracts 'approved by the Board in amounts up to project contingency established by the Board. SECTION 3. Outstanding encumbrances shown on the TCSD books at June 30, 1992, are hereby appropriated for such contracts or obligations for 1993-94. SECTION 4. The .Board Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTFJ~ at a regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District on the 22nd day of June, 1993. ATFEST: Patricia H. Birdsall, President June S. Greek City Clerk/Board Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk/Board Secretary, of the Temecula Community Services District, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 93- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Terriecula Community Services District on the 22nd day of June 1993 by the following roll call vote. A YES: DIRECTORS: NOES: DIRECTORS: ABSENT: DIRECTORS: June S. Greek, City Clerk/Board Secretary CSDReso,~08 6/93 ITEM NO. 3 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~{~~__~ FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: DATE: David F. Dixon, City Manager June 22, 1993 SUBJECT: TCSD Rates and Charges for FY 1993-94; and Establish a New Benefit Zone Entitled Service Level R PREPARED BY: (~ RECOMMENDATION: Shawn D. Nelson, Community Services Director That the Board of Directors: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES, PARKS AND RECREATION, STREET LIGHTING, GRAFFITI REMOVAL, SLOPE MAINTENANCE, AND RECYCLING AND REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993-1994 . Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ESTABLISHING A BENEFIT ZONE ENTITLED SERVICE LEVEL R WITHIN ITS BOUNDARIES DISCUSSION: The purpose of the TCSD Rates and Charges is to provide necessary community services and programs to property owners within the City of Temecula. The TCSD is currently comprised of five (5) service levels and is proposing one (1) new service level· The TCSD Service Levels are identified as follows: 1. Community Services, Parks, and Recreation. 1 s~gend~rtschgs Service Level A - Arterial Street Light, Medians, and Graffiti Removal. 061193 s 4. 5. 6. Service Level B - Residential Street Lighting. Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance. Service Level D - Recycling Program and Refuse Collection. Service Level R - Construction and Maintenance of Streets and Roads. The formula utilized to levy the rates and charges has not been changed from last fiscal year. Every non-exempt parcel within the City will receive a rate and charge for two (2) service levels: Community Services, Parks, and Recreation, and Service Level "A". Only those property owners who receive benefit from the remaining three (3) services levels pay for those services (residential street lighting, slope maintenance, recycling and refuse collection). For a single family residence, the proposed rate for Community Services Parks, and Recreation, is $64.20, an increase of $5.90 from last year. This increase is due to the expansion of community recreation facilities and programs which include the current construction of the Community Recreation Center and Senior Citizens Center. In addition, Loma Linda Park is nearly completed; John Magee Park and Kent Hindergardt Memorial Park near Highway 79 South are in process for dedication to the City; Paloma Del Sol Park near Sparkman Elementary School with lighted fields for baseball and soccer will be completed by the end of the summer; and Pala Community Park is anticipated to begin construction within the next six months. For Service Level "A" the proposed rate is $8.28 for a single family residence, an increase of $4.10. This increase is due to the addition of arterial street lights, traffic signals and a new, city-wide graffiti removal program. Service Level "B" includes only those property owners within residential subdivisions that have street lighting services. The proposed rate of $30.88 per residential unit will not be increased from last year. Service Level "C" only includes those property owners within residential subdivisions receiving TCSD maintenance of slopes and perimeter landscaping. No increases are proposed for this. service level, however decreases are proposed for some property owners. The four (4) rate levels for Service Level "C" have not changed from last year and are identified as follows: Rate C-1: $ 50.00 Rate C-2: $ 93.00 Rate C-3: $120.00 Rate C-4: $179.00 Service Level "D" provides the Recycling and Refuse Collection Program for FY 1993-94. This service level includes all single family residential properties in the City of Temecula. The 1 e~egen~s~e~sch~s oelle3 proposed yearly rate of $165.00 has increased $5.88 from last year. This is due to an increase in County landfill dumping costs and normal Consumer Price Index increases. Additionally, the TCSD proposes to establish a new benefit zone entitled Service Level "R" to provide for the construction, installation and maintenance of streets and roads. The boundaries of Service Level "R" will be contiguous with the City. However, no rates and charges will be levied for this service level in Fiscal Year 1993-94. In summary, the net increase of the TCSD Rates and Charges for a single family residence for FY 1993-94 is $15.88 per year. . FISCAL IMPACT: The revenue generated from the TCSD Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 1993-94 will fund the parks and recreation; median and slope maintenance; street lighting and graffiti removal; and recycling and refuse collection services in the City of Temecula. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution adopting the TCSD Rates and Charges for FY 1993-94. Resolution establishing Service Level "R". Annual Levy Report for FY 1993-94. 1 s~endes~'tschgs 061183 RESOLUTION NO. CSD 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES, PARKS AND RECREATION, STREET LIGHTING, GRAFFITI REMOVAL, SLOPE MAINTENANCE, AND RECYCLING AND REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993-1994. WHEREAS, upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, California (the "City") effective December 1, 1989, voters also approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District ("TCSD"), which has the same area and boundaries as the City and whose Board of Directors (the "Board") consists of the members of the City Council of the City; and WHEREAS, the TCSD proposes to continue such rates and charges for community services and parks, recreation facilities, services and programs, operation, maintenance, service and administration of street lighting, graffiti removal, slope maintenance, and recycling and refuse collection services (the "Services and/or Facilities") for those areas specifically benefitted thereby and charges by the county services areas or the TCSD for such services in prior fiscal years; and WHEREAS, the Board has requested the preparation of a report for Fiscal Year 1993- 1994 containing the proposed rates and charges for filing with the Secretary of the TCSD pursuant to the Community Services District Law being Division 3 of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 61000 (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 61621.2 of the Act, an Engineer'S Report for Collection for the Fiscal Year 1993/1994 (the "Repon")has been presented and filed with the Secretary of the TCSD which contains a description of the proposed Services and/or Facilities to be provided and the proposed rates and charges for such Services and/or Facilities, and a. description of the parcels subject to the rates and charges. The Report is based upon a budget adopted by the Board for the proposed Services and/or Facilities for specific areas where such Services and/or Facilities are provided, including necessary staff and administrative expenses. WHEREAS, the Board requested that staff provide mailed notice of the public hearing regarding these rates and charges to each property owner subject to the rates and charges at least fourteen (14) days prior to the date set for the public hearing; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was mailed and published as required by law and the affidavits of publication and mailing are on file with the Secretary; and CSDr~o\06 -1- WHEREAS, at the public hearing conducted on June 22, 1993, as noticed, the TCSD heard and considered all oral and written protests and comments by any interested person concerning the proposed rates and charges or the method of their collection; and WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the public hearing, the TCSD modi~ed/confh-med the rates and charges in the mounts set out on Exhibit "A" entitled "Project Summary", attached and incorporated by this reference, confirmed their collection on the tax roll and approved an appeal procedure; and WHEREAS, the TCSD further finds that based on the Report and budget, the rates and charges as set out on Exhibit "A" are the reasonable cost of the Services and/or Facilities to be provided by the TCSD for Fiscal Year 1993-94; and WHEREAS, the TCSD proposes to collect the rates and charges at the same time, in the same manner, by the same persons and together with and not separately from, the property taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shall be delinquent at the same time and thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes. All laws applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, are applicable to these rates and charges. However, if for the first year the charge is levied, the real property to which the charge relates has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien of a bona fide encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the first installment of such taxes appear on the roll, then the charge, or the delinquency in that charge, assessed pursuant to this section shall not result in a lien against the property, but instead shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection; NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DOES HEREBY, RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The rates and charges for Fiscal Year 1993/1994 as set out on Exhibit "A" for the Services and/or Facilities are adopted for Fiscal Year 1993/1994. Section 2. The TCSD shall collect such rates and charges at the same time, in the same manner, by the same persons and together with and not separately from, the property taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shall be delinquent at the same time and thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes. All laws applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, are applicable to these ra{¢s and charges. However, if for the first year the charge is levied, the real property to which the charge relates has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien of a bona fide encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the fixst installment of such taxes appear CSDr~o\06 -2- on the roll, then the charge, or the delinquency in that charge, assessed pursuant to this section shall not result in a lien against the property, but instead shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection. Section 3. If a property owner subject to these rates and charges challenges or questions the levy of the rates and charges to such property owner's property, such property owner may appeal the levy by filing an appeal with the TCSD Secretary before 4:30 p.m. on July 1, 1993, pursuant to procedures established by the TCSD. The appeal period may be extended to September 1st, provided that the property owner reimburse the City for any County Assessors fees associated with amending the property tax statement. Section 4. If a property owner subject to these rates and charges believes that payment of the rates and charges for fiscal year 1993/1994 would create a hardship for that property owner during that fiscal year, such property owner may appeal the levy by filing a hardship appeal with the TCSD Secretary before 4:30 p.m. on July 1, 1993, pursuant to procedures established by the TCSD. The appeal period may be extended to September 1st, provided that the property owner reimburse the City for any County Assessors fees associated with amending the property tax statement. Section 5. The TCSD Secretary is ordered to transmit or cause to be transmitted to the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, California {the "County") before August 10, 1993, the property tax roll with such rates and charges enumerated for each parcel not exempt therefrom; and the County Auditor of the County is hereby designated, required, empowered, authorized, instructed, directed and ordered to make collection of all such assessments as shown on that roll and to perform any and all duties necessary therefor. Section 6. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act the levy and collection of these rates and charges is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15273 of the State Guidelines and the Secretary is instructed to file a Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this. 22nd day of June~ 1993. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT . - ATTEST: Patricia H. Birdsall, President June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] CSDr~o\06 -1- STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA ) ) ) SS I, June S. Greek, City Clerk/Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 93- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District on the 22nd day of June, 1993, by the following roll call vote: AYES: DIRECTORS: NOES: DIRECTORS: ABSENT: DIRECTORS: June S. Greek, City Clerk CSDr~o\06 -4- EXHIBIT A PROJECT SUMMARY TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT On April 1, 1993, Municipal Financial Services was retained by the City of Temecula to prepare the Annual Levy Report for the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) for the Fiscal Year 1993/1994. Pursuant to the Community Services District Law, Division 3 of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 61000 et seo., the TCSD has the power to levy and collect special assessments in order to carry on its operations and to provide the services and facilities furnished by it. The levy and collection of the special assessments is accomplished by the assignment of benefit to each parcel within a specific service level. A Service Level is a defined area that provides a specific service, operation and maintenance and/or program to only those parcels contained within that service level. The TCSD is currently composed of five (5) city-wide service levels and is proposing one (1) new service level. The descriptions of the service levels are as follows: e Community Services. Parks and Recreation: Operations, maintenance, and administration of the City community park systems, recreation facilities, services and programs. Service Level A - Arterial Street Lights. Medians. and Graffiti Removal. Operations, maintenance, utility costs, and administration of all arterial street lights, medians, traffic signals, and city-wide graffiti removal. Service Level B - Residential Street Lights. Operations, maintenance, utility costs and administration of all residential street lights. Service Level C Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance. Operations, maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and administration for all perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD. e Service Level D - Recycling, Refuse Collection and Street Sweeping. Operations, and administration of the recycling and refuse collection program, and street sweeping services for all single family residential homes· 3c% 1 eVeeoeVeeo9301 rev:le~O81113 Proposed Service Level R. Construction, installation, and maintenance of streets and roads. The Financial Analysis contained herein contains each Service Level including with their totals. Service Level Levv Budget Community Services/Parks Service Level A Service Level B Service Level C Service Level D Service Level R $SFR TOTAL TCSD LEVY FY 93/94 $2,415,360.00 $ 64.20 311,517.00 8.28 191,765.00 30.88 422,801.00 Variable 1,379.730.00 165.00 0.00 0.00 $4,721,173.00 The Levy and Collection amounts for all non-exempt parcels within the TCSD for the Fiscal Year 1993/1994 are as shown on the Assessment Roll on file with the City Clerk. 3c%1 aVee~eVe~9301 rev: 1 e%081193 RESOLUTION NO. CSD 93-... A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ESTABLISHING A BENEFIT ZONE ENTITLED SERVICE LEVEL R WITHIN ITS BOUNDARIFS WHEREAS, upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, California (the "City") effective December 1, 1989, voters also approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District (the "TCSD"), which has the same area and boundaries as the City and whose Board of Directors (the "Board") consists of the members of the City Council of the City; and WHEREAS, on May 25, '1993, the Board adopted Resolution No. which declared its intention to establish a new benefit zone enti~ed Service Level R and which set a public hearing in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing wasmailed to all property owners within Service Level R and was published twice as required under the Community Services District Law being Division 3 of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 61000 (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, at the public hearing conducted on June 22, 1993, as noticed, the TCSD heard and considered all oral and written protests and comments by any interested persons concerning the formation of Service Level R; and WHEREAS, prior to the public hearing, written protests were not filed by either fifty percent (50%) or more of the registered voters within Service Level R or by owners of fifty percent (50%) or more of the value of land and improvements ~within Service Level R; NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DOES HEREBY, RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Service Level R is hereby created and established within the TCSD for road construction, installation and maintenance. Section 2. The boundaries of Service Level R are coterminous with the City boundaries. , Section 3. The estimated costs 6f the services provided by Service Level R is $0.00 for fiscal year 1993-94. csdresos/07 Section 4. The TCSD Secretary shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFFEIJ, this 22nd day of June, 1993. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Patricia H. Birdsall, President ATTEST: June S. Greek, Secretary/City Clerk [SEAL] I, June S. Greek, City Clerk/Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoin Resolution No. CSD 93- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District on the 22nd day of June, 1993, by the following roll call vote: AYES: DIRECTORS: NOES: DIRECTORS: ABSENT: DIRECTORS: csdmsos/07 '7993 CITY OF TEMECULA PRELIMINARY ANNUAL LEVY REPORT TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 199311994 _e N I ',% REVISED JUNE 1993 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. 28765 Single Oak Dr., Second Floor Temecula, CA 92590 Tel: (909) 699-3990 Fax: (909) 699-3460 3727 Buchanan, Suite 202 San Francisco, CA 94123 Tel: (415) 441-3550 Fax: (415) 441-1401 ..... "MFS TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................1 A. Introduction .........~ ...............................................................................1 B. Description of the Distdct and Services .............................................1 DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT ...................................................................3 CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT .........................................................................5 A. Annexations .......................................................................................5 B. Modifications of the District Structure ................................................5 C. District Budget Changes ....................................................................5 DISTRICT BUDGETS ........................................................................................6 METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT .....................................................................8 Appendix A - LAND USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS ............... 10 Appendix B - 1993~94 COLLECTION ROLL .........................................11 OVERVIEW A. Introduction The Temecula Community Services District ("District") was formed in 1989 upon incorporation of the City to continue services previously provided by the County.. The City collects special rates and charges in order to provide services and maintain the improvements within the District. The District has been formed and the rates and charges established pursuant to Section 61621 of the Government Code. This Report describes the proposed rates and charges per parcel for Fiscal Year 1993/94 based on the historical and estimated cost to provide services and maintain improvements that provide a benefit to properties within the District. Each parcel charged receives direct benefit from the District. For the purposes of this Report, wherever the word "parcel" is used, it refers to an individual property assigned its own assessment number. The County Auditor/Controller uses assessment numbers when identifying those properties that are charged for special district benefits. A public hearing will be held to allow the public an opportunity to hear and be heard regarding the District. After the public hearing, the Board of Directors may order the modification of this Report. After approval of this Report, as submitted or as modified, the Board shall order the levy and collection of rates and charges for Fiscal Year 1993/94. In such case, the rate and charge information will be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The County Auditor/Controller will include the rates and charges on the property tax roll for Fiscal Year 1993/94. Description of the District and Services The Distdct provides certain services and the maintenance of specific improvements within public rights-of-way and dedicated landscape easements throughout the City. The District consists of six separate service levels providing services within certain areas throughout the City. Each parcel is grouped within one or more service levels based upon its location and the quantity and type of services provided within that area. Each service level has diffedng costs depending upon the various services providing benefits to the parcels within the level. Each parcel is charged its fair share of the costs of the services providing benefit. Services and improvements provided include the construction and maintenance of community parks, recreation programs, street lighting, median landscape maintenance, perimeter landscape maintenance, slope protection, a recycling and refuse collection program, and road improvement construction and maintenance. Table I below lists the various Service Levels within the District along with the total levy budget, charge per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU) as compared to the 1992/93 fiscal year, along with the 1993/94 total EDU, and the total number of parcels within each Service Level. TABLE I SERVICE LEVELS Community Service~, Parks, and i~ $2,164,534 $58.30 $2,415,360 $64.20 I $5.90 37,622.39 j RecreaUon Service Level A Artedal Street LighUng and Medians Service Level B Re~idenUal Street LighUng Service Level C Local Land~ceping and Slopes: Rate Level # 1 Rate Level # 2 Rate Level # 3 Rate Level # 4 Service Level D Citywide Recycling and Refuse Service 'eveJ R 154,776 4.18 157,304 4.18 I 0 37,622.39 192,650 30.88 191,765 30.89 0 6,210 5,550 50.00 26, 150 96, 162 93.00 83,235 98,040 120.00 137,280 233,953 179.00 176,136 $1,250,385 $159.12 1,379,730 $0 50.00 0 93.00 0 t20.00 0 119.00 0 165.00 $5.88 so~oo 523 895 1,144 964 8,362 Exhibit A below illustrates the relationship of those parcels located within each of the six Service Levels. EXHIBIT A 14,361 14,361 6,210 523 895 964 8,362 PARCELS BY SERVICE LEVEL 15ooo.~/~ ~ooooi 5000~ csP .... LEVEL A LEVEL B LEVEL C LEVEL D LEVEL R DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT A description of the current Service Levels within the District is listed below. Community Services, Parks, and Recreation includes maintenance, service, and operations of all 'public parks in the District. Most park construction is provided either by Developers as a condition of their residential projects or Development Impact Fees. This Service Level also allows for the construction of the Community Recreation Center and its debt service. In addition, this Service Level provides funding for the various recreation programs throughout the City. The following is a list of some of the City's Parks and Recreation facilities: · Rancho California Sports Park · Sam Hicks Monument Park · Veterans Park · Bahia Vista Park · Calle Aragon Park · Teen Recreation Center · Senior Center °Community Recreation Center · Loma Linda Park · Riverton Park · John Magee Park · Kent Hindergardt Memorial Park oPaloma Del Sol Park Service Level A, Arterial Street Lighting and Medians provides a beneft to all parcels within the City through the servicing, operation, and maintenance of street lighting and landscaped medians along arterial streets. Service Level B, Residential Street Lighting provides a benefit to all single family residential and vacant parcels within those tracts requiring servicing, operation, and maintenance of local street lighting. Service Level C, Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes provides the servicing, operation, and maintenance of perimeter landscaped areas and slopes within the public right of way and dedicated easements within certain tracts. The level of maintenance required within these tracts varies depending on operating costs and therefore, four Rate Levels have been established. 3 Table II below shows a breakdown of the Tracts composing each Rate Level within Service Level C, Local Landscaping and Slopes. TABLE II Service Level C Tracts :Ra~ i"~ei'~ii ...............i'Sii:6ii'i~;,te Level ~r2 'T~'~:i ~'~'~ .............t'~""':'fm~ Name Tm~ t Tm~ Name ~i~y D~j~p~%nt 23267-0 'Ridgeview 20735-7 Maffinique 23267-1 ,20735-9 'Saddlewo~ ............................ ~]~'~ .............................'2ose ~ ~ ..... "' ~217~ Rancho Solana ~26861-1 !26861-2 ~22593-0 ~22593-1 ~22593-2 ~20879-0 20879-1 Winchester Creek ~20130-0 20130-1 20130-2 .20130-3 120130,4 20130-5 20130-6 ~21340-0 !21340-2 i21340-3 kNoodcmst CountW 21561 22208 t! $93.00' jRate Level #3 Summit /intege Hills S120.00 i. Ra"'=:i;~'~;~F~ .......... ~Fl'rac Tract # i t Name . Tract # 23218 i,,'Meadowview 21765 :! 18518-0 :jSignet S~'~'~ ...... 20882-0 18518-2 ii 20882-1 i 18518-3 120643 i20643-4 i22203 i22203-4 !22715-0 i22715-1 i22715-2 i 22716-0 i22716-1 i22716-2 i22716-3 i22716-4 ~22915-0 i22915-1 ;~22915-2 22915-3 Village Grove :20882-2 ~20882-3 !21672-1 ~21672-2 !21672-3 !21672-4 ~21674-0 ~21674-1 ~21674-2 i21674-3 i21675-1 ~21675-2 ~21675-3 i21675_4 i21675'5 ;21675-6 Service Level D, Citywide Recycling and Street Sweeping provides the operations and administration of the refuse and recycling program and street sweeping services for all single family residential homes. Service Level R, Roads includes the construction and maintenance of streets and roads throughout the City. 4 ~ CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT For Fiscal Year 1993/94, changes within the District that affect the levy are outlined below. A. Annexations Annexations to Service Level C, Local Landscaping and Slopes am the parcels within Tracts 26861-1, 26861-2, 23267-0, 23267-1 and 23267-4 (Presley Development). Modifications of the District Structure A new Service Level, Service Level R (Roads) has been added. This Service Level will provide funding for construction and maintenance of public streets and roads throughout the City. No charges are proposed within Service Level R for this fiscal year. District Budget Changes The Community Services, Parks and Recreation Service Level rates have increased due to the operations and maintenance costs of the Community Recreation Center, as well as several neighborhood and community parks that will be added to the City's park system. Service Level D has increased due to an increase in the County landfill dumping costs and normal Consumer Price Index (CPI) increases. .... MFS DISTRICT BUDGETS TABLE III 1993/94 DISTRICT BUDGETS !iTEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ' ,! !=:OPERATING BUDGET DEPARTMENT SUMMARY !!FOR THE YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1993 Number i PE 5100 ii RS Retirement 5102 iiState Unemployment 5103i ~Medicare FICA 5104 ~uto AIIowance 5106 !~Unemployment Training Tax 5109 .~orkers Compensation J 5112 j~Heelth Benefits i~Part-Tirne (Project) 5113 , 5119 iPart-Time Retirement 5120 Compensated Absences 5126 h'otal Personnel services i}oPERA T,O.S A.D MA,.TE.A.CE ~Telephone Service (Cellular) ~ ~ 5208 !iRepair & Maint. - Facilities i 5212 !!Mai.te.a.ce Supp.. i 5218i ~iOffice Supplies i 52201 :ipdnting t 52221 ~Legal Documents/Maps 52241 ?Dues and Memberships 5226 !{Puu.c, tion, 5228 !~Postage and Packaging 5230 ~!Rent - Office 5234 .t-Eq.ipme.t ;,Re 5238~ !!Equipment Lease 5239 iiSmall tools/Equipment 5242 !Uniforms 5243i ~Signs 5244i i~Legal Services 52461 !!Consulting Services 5248! i~Other Outside Services 52501 ~Advertising ' 52541 Community Services 190! $456.e9o! $65,089! $17,021 $6,625! $2,400! $4571 $23,736i $82,3201 $139,558i $5,235! $5.616i $11,0001 $116,ooo~ $19,ooo! $3o,oooi $2,000t $2,500~ $1,000~ $33,750! $13,0001 $10,380! $186,969! $10,000! $6,000i $4,000! $15,000i $243,950! $5,0001 , Level A Level B 191 192~ $13,200 $19,239 $1,880 $2,740 $581 $847 $191 $279 Level C 193; $47,117i $6,710~ $2,073 I $683~ $13 $19 $47! $1,492 $189 $3,208~ $2,645 $2,640 $9,114! $20,002 $26,253 $68,9521 $8,0001 $115,473! Level D Level R $01 $0 $536,446:~ $76,3-! $2o,5221i $7 7781~ $2Aoo~ $536~ $28,625 $97 o191! !1 $920 134~ , $11,000} $116 0001 $19,oooh $30,000t $2,500~ $1,000~ $6,0001 37 $3,501 $13,000i f $10,380! $310,442 $10,000 $6o00011 $4 000~ $15,000~ $0~ $243,950} $5,000t iTEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ~:OPERATING BUDGET DEPARTMENT SUMMARY iiFOR THE YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1993 i,!OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE ~Publ c Notices !! ence Education iConfer iiMeetings in Town iMi,ge iiFuel Expense Blueprints Recreation Supplies Arterial Street Lighting Landscape Maintenance I!Assessment Administration Hauling !~CIP Assistant Engineer !iCity Administration Charges i~Total Operations and Maintenance ;!INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS !!Li,bility Insurance i _ fo on Systems ~}Cop i~Facilities iiTotal Internal Services !~CAPITAL OUTLAY !'=Office Furnishings !! !!Office Equipment i~Vehides i~Equipment !Boncl Proceeds !~Total Capital Outlay iiRESERVE FOR CONTINGENCY i! ~ TOTAL DISTRICT COSTS !iRECREATION REVENUE !!FUND BALANCE CARRY OVER ;!BALANCE TO LEVY iCommunity Services Acct. I Number I 190 . CONTINUED 5256~ $1,000! 5258~ $8,000~ 52601 $2 0001 5262~ $3,500i 5263 $4,000! 5300 $143,507 5500 5510 5525 $20,000! 5540 $155.29;}i $1,111,656i $27.248i $26,556i $49,814! $22.613; $65.177~ $191,408i 5602i $5,000! 5610! $22,000i 5901 { $505.000i I $547,000} 0! $2,654,991 ! 176,500! 63,131~ $2 415,360! Level A 191 $121,302 $8,000 $137,302 i $157,304! $157,304! Level B 192 $165,512 $165,512! $191,765i $191,765 Level C 193; $238,376! $353,849t 01 $422,801 $422,801 Level D $1,419,000 $1,419,000l $1,419 000i $1,379,7301 Level R $0 $0i Total $1,000~{ S8,000~i $2,ooo $3,500! $500fi $143,5o7 t $286,814~ $246,376!! $20,000! $3 187,319~ $27,248i $26,54 $49,814i I $22 613 $65.177i $191,408j $15,000} $22,0001 $505,0~$0f · $547,000: $o~ $4,845,861 METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT As in past years, the cost to provide services within the District will be fairly distributed among each assessable property based upon the estimated benefit received by each property, The benefit formula used is based upon the land use and size of a property. Each property is assigned an Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) factor that reflects the property's land use and degree of benef'~. Please refer to Appendix A for a complete listing of land use codes and their associated EDU. The following is the formula used to calculate each property's District charges. Parcel EDU X Acres or Units X Charge per EDU = Parcel Charge Table IV below reflects the levy calculations for vadous property types for each Service Level. TABLE IV PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES, PARKS, AND RECREATION Property Type ;:!::~: .....' .......... ............::Parcel':!Xi' ~rgei:i!~i~:ii=:i:~:~ i:i:parcel:ii~::;i~ :::!~Multlpllee ! ~: :!::;:i::~:;.:;:i;:~:;:'::ii~:!iEBU ; ~ ' perCharge Single Family Residential Multi Family Residential Agricultural Single Family Vacant Non-Residential Vacant Non-Residential Improved 1.00 $64.20 $64.20 Per Unit 0.75 $64.20 $48.15 Per Unit 0.50 $64.20 $32.10 Per Acre 2.00 $64.20 $128.40 Per Acre 4.00 $64.20 $256.80 Per Acre 6.00 $64.20 $385.20 Per Acre Property Type: Single Family Residential Multi Family Residential Agricultural Single Family Vacant Non-Residential Vacant Non-Residential Improved · ! :i Parcel: X:i Charge ~ :=: :~Parcel : : . ~ : ·: : .iEDU ! per:: . .: i: :Charge PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL A 1.00 $4.18 $4.18 0.75 $4.18 $3.14 0.50 $4.18 $2.09 2.00 $4.18 $8.36 4.00 $4.18 $16.72 6.00 $4.18 $25.08 Multiplier Per Unit Per Unit Per Acre Per Acre Per Acre Per Acre Single Family Residential PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL B 1.00 $30.88 $30.88 Per Unit PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL C Single Family Residential Rate C-1 Single Family Residential Rate C-2 Single Family Residential Rate C-3 Single Family Residential Rate C-4 1.00 $50.00 $50.00 1.00 $93.00 $93.00 1.00 $120.00 $120.00 1.00 $179.00 $179.00 Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL D Single Family Residential 1.00 $165.00 $165.00 Per Unit Appendix A - LAND USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS ': Single Family Residential :. Multi Family Residential :Agricultural ~i Single Family Vacant Non-Residential Vacant Equivalent Dwelling Unft 1.00 0.75 0.50 2.00 4.00 Non-Residential Improved .... 6.00 i Units .' Units = ;i Acres Acres Acres Acres Appendix B - 1993/94 COLLECTION ROLL Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the County Assessor's map for the year in which this Report is prepared. Non-assessable lots or parcels include government-owned land, public utility- owned property, and land principally encumbered by public rights-of-way. A listing of parcels within this District, along with the charges, has been submitted to the Clerk of the City and, by reference, is made part of this report. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINKNCE OFFICER CITY Fj~J~GER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: BOARD OF DIRECTORS FROM: DATE: DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER JUNE 22, 1993 SUBJECT: DEPARTMENTAL REPORT PREPARED BY: SHAWN D. NELSON, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR The City is now in the process of receiving approvals from the Army Corps of Engineers and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regarding Pala Community Park. It is expected that this project will be out for public bid in July, 1993. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan was reviewed and approved by the Community Services and Planning Commissions. The Master Plan will be forwarded for consideration by the City Council after the General Plan has been adopted. Improvements to Loma Linda Park are completed, and the park is now on 90 day maintenance. The temporary fencing will be removed on June 18, and the park will be dedicated to the City on July 8, 1993. The Kent Hindergardt Memorial Park located in the Presley Development is progressing with the slope and turf areas 'now hydroseeded. The playground area has also been installed. This park is on '90 day maintenance and should be dedicated to the City by the end of summer. Also, this park is being constructed by the developer to meet the Quimby requirements for their subdivision project. The rough grading has been completed on Paloma Del Sol Park with the irrigation and rough plumbing being installed currently. This park will consist of two lighted ballfields with soccer overlays, restroom/snack bar facility, and parking improvements. This park is expected to be dedicated to the City in October, 1993. The Senior Center is currently under construction and is expected to be completed by August, 1993. Also, staff was informed by the County of Riverside, Office on Aging Department that the City's Senior Center has been selected as an approved site for a daily Nutrition For Seniors Program. This program is totally funded by the Office on Aging other than the City has to provide a facility for the program. All costs of staffing, food preparation, and administration will be borne by the Office on Aging. Phase II of the Community Recreation Center (CRC) Project is moving forward with the perimeter walls for the gymnasium and multi-purpose room nearly completed. Staff is now working with the CRC Foundation to determine equipment and furniture needs for the CRC. It is anticipated that the CRC will be completed in November or December, 1993. The recreation brochure for Summer/Fall 1993 was distributed the first week in June, 1993. The recreation program continues to expand in the areas of recreation classes, special events, teen programs, senior programs, and excursions. The development of a skateboarding area in the Rancho California Sports Park has been included in the five (5) year Capital Improvement Program under the Sports Park Parking Lot Project. If this project is approved, staff will pursue selecting a landscape architect and forming a project committee comprised of skateboarders and Teen Council members to develop a design for the skateboarding area. The City released formal public bids on June 14, 1993 for Riverton Park. Bid opening for this project is scheduled for July 8, 1993. Construction is scheduled to begin on this park in August, 1993. TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 APPROVAL TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Prepared by: RECOMMENDATION: entitled: TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Executive Director/Agency Members Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer June 22, 1993 Fiscal Year 1993-94 Annual Operating Budget Grant M. Yates, Financial Services Administrator That the Agency Members adopt Resolution No. RDA 93- RESOLUTION NO. RDA 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ADOPTING THE OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 FOR THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS DISCUSSION/FISCAL IMPACT: The Fiscal Year 1993-94 Budget for the RDA contains two components, Debt Service and Low/Moderate Housing Set Aside. The Debt Service component of the budget serves as the operating budget for the RDA. The tax increment iS anticipated to be $1,956,487 with projected expenditures of $1,918,333. Expenditures include $1,447,400 for Debt Service on the bonds, $200,000 for Economic Development and $75,000 for City Administration. The Low/Moderate Housing Set Aside is estimated to be $1,304,325 for Fiscal Year 1993-94. This revenue total equals 20% of the estimated gross tax increment (before pass thru amounts} for the RDA. In Fiscal Year 1993-94 this gross revenue is estimated to be $6,521,624. Attachment: 94 Resolution RDA 93- Adopting Operating Budget for FY 1993- the Executive Director may approve change orders on Public Works contracts approved by the Council in amounts up to project contingency established by the Agency. SECTION 3. Outstanding encumbrances shown on the Re, development books at June 30, 1993, are hereby appropriated for such contracts or obligations for 1993-94. SECTION 4. The Agency Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED at a regular meeting of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency on the 22nd day of June, 1993. Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek City Clerk/Agency Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I, June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY 'that the foregoing Resolution No. RDA 93- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of Redevelopment Agency on the 22nd day of June 1993 by the following roll call vote. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: AGENCY MEMBERS: AGENCY MEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary RDAResos\006 -2- ITEM NO. 2 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 2.2 2.3 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Redevelopment Agency Harwood T. Edvalson Assistant City Manager June 22, 1993 Item No. 2 - Approval of Offer - Rancho West Apartments City Clerk June S. Greek Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING A FORMAL OFFER ON THE RANCHO WEST APARTMENTS BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO THE RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION Authorize the Executive Director to submit an offer; Authorize the Executive Director and City Clerk to execute all necessary documents. - BACKGROUND: you under separate cover. JSG The staff will finalize a staff report on this item and forward it to APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 2.2 2.3 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Redevelopment Agency Harwood T. Edvalson Assistant City Manager June 22, 1993 Item No. 2 - Approval of Offer - Rancho West Apartments City Clerk June S. Greek Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING A FORMAL OFFER ON THE RANCHO WEST APARTMENTS BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO THE RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION Authorize the Executive Director to submit an offer; Authorize the Executive Director and City Clerk to execute all necessary documents. BACKGROUND: you under separate cover. JSG The staff will finalize a staff report on this item and forward it to ITEM NO. 3 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEy FINANCE OFFICER~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Redevelopment Agency FROM: Scott F. Field City Attorney DATE: June 22, 1993 SUBJECT: Item No. 3 - Development and Disposition Agreement - WalMart Department Store RECOMMENDATION: Negotiations with Kernper Real Estate and WalMart are currently ongoing and it is requested this public hearing be continued to the meeting of July 13, 1993. sj