HomeMy WebLinkAbout082493 CC AgendaAGFNDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER - 28816 Pujol Street
AUGUST 24, 1993 - 7:00 PM
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will
determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00
PM and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting.
All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM
EXECUTIVE SESSION: 5:30 PM - Closed Seedon of the City Council pursuant to
Govemment Code Section 54956.9 (cl regarding Dawea vs. City of Temecula and
54956.8 regarding real property negotiation 1) Honda of Temecula located at 27500
Jefferson Avenue/Norm Reeves: 2) Temecule Museum located at 41954 Main
Street/Hampton end Severs; 3) Temecula Auto Mall SIgn located st 26631 Ynez
Roadrremeculs Auto Dealers Association; end 4) Lores Unda ParklGrubeugh and Sons
end Section 54956.9 (b)
CALL TO ORDER:
Invocation
Flag Salute
ROLL CALL:
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 93-17
Resolution: No. 93-70
Mayor J. Sal Mur~oz presiding
Father Edward Renner, St. Thomas Episcopal Church
Mayor Pro Tern Roberrs
Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Mufioz
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council
on items that are not listed on the Ageride or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are
limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item
not listed on the Agenda or on the consent Calendar, a pink "Request To Speak" form
should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
eimlde/082493 I 08/11/13
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all other agenda items a 'Request To Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the egenda will be
made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these
reports.
CONSENT CALI:NDAR
2
3
NOTICr TO THr PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION
1.1
Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of July 27, 1993;
2.2 Approve the minutes of August 3, 1993;
Resolution Aoorovino List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
elende)OI2413 2 OI/llll
4
6
7
Chamber of Commerce Agreement
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Approve the FY 1993-94 agreement with the Chamber of Commerce to
provide services and authorize the Mayor and the City Manager to
execute the contract.
Service Authority for Abatement of Abandoned Vehicles
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH A SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR
ABANDONED VEHICLE ABATEMENT
AOOrOVal Of Contract Award for Plan Review Services
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
6,2
Approve the award of contract to ESGIL Corporation, as the primary
plan review firm to provide complete plan review services to the Building
and Safety Department;
Approve the retention of VanDorpe/Chou and Associates, Inc. and
Melad and Associates, to support the plan review needs of the City's
Building and Safety Department.
Amendment to Supplemental Aareement for Use of Community Development Block
Grant Funds
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
Approve the amendment to the supplemental agreement for the use of
Community Development Block Grant Funds.
eeenda/O12493 3 O1/11/93
8 for Fxtra Work on Project No. CSD 92-03. --~
9
10
11
Consideration of Additional Funding
Temecula Old Town Senior Center
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
Approve an operating transfer of $54,200 from the Development Impact
Fund to the Capital Projects Fund;
8.2 Appropriate ~54,200 to account ~210-199-801-5804.
Professional Services Contract Fiscal Year 1993-94 Video Production Services
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Award a professional services contract to Davlin for video production
services for fiscal year 1993-94.
Community Facilities District 88-12 - Reimbursement AQreements for Work Performed
During the Construction of the Ynez Road Widening Project (PW92-05)
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Approve reimbursement agreements with the Rancho California Water
District and Kemper Real Estate Management Company for
improvements to be constructed by the City's Contractor for the Ynez
Road Widening Project PW92-05.
Adootion of Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan Fees - Amendment No. ~
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE MURRIETA CREEK AREA DRAINAGE PLAN
11 o2 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-14
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 90-04
REGARDING MURRIETA CREEK AREA DRAINAGE PLAN FEES FOR SUBDIVISIONS
alencl~082413 4
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
12
Second Readino of Ordinance ADoroving Develooment Agreement No, 92-1 and Ordinance
Aoorovino Chanoe of 7one No. ~1 - Linfield School
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1
Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-15
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 92-1 BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND
THE LINFIELD SCHOOL FOR A TEN YEAR PERIOD TO ENSURE THE
DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT AS SENIOR HOUSING, CONGREGATE CARE
FACILITY, SKILLED NURSING, PERSONAL CARE, A NINE HOLE PRIVATE GOLF
COURSE AND DEDICATION OF A 2.3 NET ACRE PARCEL TO THE CITY OF
TEMECULA FOR A SENIOR CENTER LOCATED NORTH OF PAUBA ROAD, SOUTH
OF RANCHO VISTA ROAD AND EAST OF THE TEMECULA VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL
12.2
Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-16
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING
THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY FOR THE CHANGE OF ZONE
APPLICATION CONTAINED IN CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 21, CHANGING THE ZONE
FROM R-R (RURAL RESIDENTIAL) TO R-3 (GENERAL RESIDENTIAL) ON PROPERTY
LOCATED NORTH OF PAUBA ROAD, SOUTH OF RANCHO VISTA ROAD AND
EAST OF THE TEMECULA VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NO. 946-070-008
COUNCIL BUSINESS
13
14
Status Reoort on the Detailed Imolementation Strategy and Regional Air
Proorams
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Review the attached material and direct staff to prepare
implementation programs for the Council's consideration.
Dial-a-Ride Van Prooram
(Placed on the agenda at the request of Mayor Pro Tam Robarts)
Quality
specific
egenda/O124H 6 01/11/13
Soeed Undulations
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council
consider the adoption of · policy covering the installation of speed
undulations in residential neighborhoods in Temecula.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting: August 31, 1993, 6:00 PM, Workshop on AD 159, 161, Main Conference
Room, Temecula City Hall, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California
Next meeting: September, 7, 1993, Workshop on Council Norms, 6:00 PM, Main
Conference Room, Temecula City Hall, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California
Next regular meeting: -September 14, 1993, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816
Pujol Street, Temecula, California
Igevle/012493 · OI/11/13
TEMECUI ' GOMMI, tN~Y S~VIC~ DISTRICT MEtfINn - Fro be held at 8:00)
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
PUBLIC COMMENT:
President Patricia H. Birdsall
DIRECTORS:
Mufioz, Parks, Robarts, Stone, Birdsall
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a
completed pink 'Request to Speak' to the City Clerk. When you are
called to speak, please come forward and state your name and
address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of the meeting of July 27, 1993.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT - Dixon
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting September 14, 1993, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community
Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
egende/OIJ4e3 7 01/1 NIl
TFMECUI A R;DEVI:I OpMFNT ARFNCY MEFTINR
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
Chairperson Ronald J; Parks presiding
AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Roberts, Stone, Mui~oz, Parks
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a completed
pink "Request to Speak' to the City Clerk. When you are called to
speak, please come forward and state your name and address for
the record.
AGENCY BUSINESS
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of July 27, 1993.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting September 14, 1993, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community
Center, 28816, Temecula, California
~413 ·
ITEM
NO.
1
ITEM
NO.
2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
CITY COUNCIL
HELD JULY 27, 1993
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order on Tuesday, July
27, 1993, 7:15 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula,
California. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Pro Tem Ron Roberrs. Councilmember
Birdsall led the flag salute.
PRESENT: 4
ABSENT: 1
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Roberts
Mur~oz
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, Assistant. City Manager Harwood Edvalson,
City Attorney F. Scott Field, City Clerk June S. Greek and Recording Secretary Gail Zigler.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor John Webb, Crossroads of the Valley.
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
1993 Balloon and Wine Festival Chairman Steve Farenbaugh and 1994 Festival Chairman
Dennis Frank presented the Temecula City Council with a 1993 Balloon and Wine Festival
framed poster and commemorative pin in appreciation of the City Council's support of the
annual festival.
PUBLIC COMMENT
James Dublino, 29755 Via Norte, Temecula, expressed concern that he feels the City Council
continues to spend City funds and fails to see the seriousness of the current recession. Mr.
Dublino said he feels the City Council should set aside funds for the residents of the City. Mr.
Dublino said that he viewed the previous City Council meeting on the cable television and
expressed his concern regarding the WaI-Mart development and the traffic study that was
discussed.
Jamie Christian, 30762 Calle Pina Colada, Temecula, advised the Council that after the
second reading of the ordinance regarding the WaI-Mart store approval, a referendum petition
will be circulated throughout the City.
CCMINOTI27/93 -1 - 08/02/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 27, 1993
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Stone requested Items No. 6 and No. 8 be removed from Consent Calendar
for discussion. Councilmember Stone indicated that he would be voting "no" on Item No. 13.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve
Consent Calendar Items No. I - 5, No. 7, and No. 9 - 13.
The motion carried as follows for Consent Calendar Item No. I - 5, No. 7, and No. 9 - 12:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Roberrs
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Muf~oz
Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of June 16, 1993;
2.2 Approve the minutes of June 22, 1993.
Resolution AoorovinQ List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt e resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-61
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
CCMINO7127183 -2- 08/02/93
~'- CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 27, 1993
e
"No Parking" Zone on Jefferson Avenue North of Winchester Road
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-62
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING 'NO PARKING' ZONE ON JEFFERSON AVENUE NORTH OF
WINCHESTER ROAD
Installation of Two (2) Stoo Sians
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO~ 93-63
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
ESTABLISHING 'STOP" SIGNS
THE
CITY OF TEMECULA
Reimbursement Aqreement with the Rancho California Water District for Street
Improvements for Avenida De Ventas Road -
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
Approve the Reimbursement Agreement with the Rancho California Water
District and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement on the City's behalf
and the City Clerk to attest to the same.
Contract Aareement for Street Address Numberina
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Approve a contract agreement with Bruce Stewart, to renew existing contract
to provide address numbering services on an as-needed basis.
CCMIN07/27193 -3- 06/02/83
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUJ, Y 97. 1993 ~-~
10.
Soecific Classification and Salary Adiustments
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 93-50 ADOPTING A REVISED
SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS
11.
Release Faithful Performance Warranty Bonds and Material and Labor Bonds in Tract
No. 20154
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1
Authorize the release of Street and Sewer and Water System Faithful
Performance Warranty Bonds, and Material and Labor Bonds in Tract No.
20154, and Direct the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Warranty
Bonds and so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to release the
Material and Labor Bonds.
12.
Resolution Desianating Certain Classifications of City Officers and Emolovees to
Exercise Arrest and Citation Authority for Violations of the Temecula Municioal Code -
RECOMMENDATION:
12.
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-65
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
DESIGNATING CERTAIN CLASSIFICATIONS OF CITY
EMPLOYEES TO EXERCISE ARREST AND CITATION
VIOLATIONS OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
OF TEMECULA
OFFICERS AND
AUTHORITY FOR
CCMIN07127193 -4- 09/02/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 27.1993
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
Second Reading of Ordinance Amending Official Zoninc~ Mao for Change of Zone
Aoolication Contained in Planning Aoolication No. PA93-0043 -WalMart
13.
RECOMMENDATION:
13.
Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-13
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF .TEMECULA,
AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY FOR THE CHANGE OF
ZONE APPLICATION CONTAINED IN PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA93-
0043, CHANGING THE ZONE FROM R-R {RURAL RESIDENTIAL) TO CoP-S
(SCENIC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF YNEZ AND WINCHESTER ROADS, AND KNOWN AS
A PORTION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 910-130-046 AND 910-130-
047
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
approve staff recommendation. The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs
I COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz
e
Contract Chanc~e Order No. 011 for Ynez Road Wideninc~ Project. PW92-05. CFD 88-
12
Councilmember Stone questioned the number of changes orders submitted on this
project.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts stated that he also had a concern for the quantity of change
orders submitted for this project and said that he wanted to see the project expedited.
Public Works Director Tim Serlet advised the Council that it is not uncommon for a
project of this size to have several change orders. Director Serlet said that he is
meeting with representatives from the Vance Corporation to discuss the issue of
expediting completion of this project.
CCMIN07/27193 -6- 08/02/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 97, 1993 ~
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Approve Contract Change Order No. 11 for Ynez Road Widening Project
(PW92-05) for labor and equipment for stand-by time during the relocetion of
conflicting utilities, in the amount of $71,292.
The motion carried as follows:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
AYES: 4
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 1
Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Roberts
None
Mufioz
Contract Award for Plan Review Services
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
Approve the award of contract to ESGIL Corporation, as the primary plan
review firm to provide complete plan review services to the Building and Safety
Department;
8.2
Retain the services of Van Dorpe/Chou and Associates, Inc. and Melad end
Associates to support the plan review needs of the City's Building and Safety
Department.
Councilmember Stone stated that he is concerned that the City consistently awards
contracts for plan review services to companies outside the City limits.
Councilmember Stone said he contacted several local business and was advised that
they had not been aware the City was going out to bid for these services and that they
were able to provide these services.
City Manager David Dixon said he has not had an opportunity to review this with Chief
Building Official Tony Elmo and asked that the Council remove this item from the
Consent Calendar and continue it to the meeting of August 10, 1993.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to continue
Consent Calendar Item No. 8 to the meeting of August 10, 1993.
The motion carried as follows:
CCMIN07127193 -6- 08/02/83
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 97. 1993
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Roberts
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mur~oz
PUBLIC HEARINGS
14.
Develooment Agreement No. 92-1. Chanoe of 7one No. 21. Tentative Parcel MaD No.
27314. Amendment No. 3 - Linfield School
Senior Planner Debbie Ubnoske presented the staff report.
Councilmember Parks asked why the Planning Commission did not send this item back
to the applicant to address their concerns.
Planner Ubnoske said that the Planning Commission had asked the applicant to provide
a site plan and based on the applicant's conceptual site plan, the Commission felt there
were still issues that they could not adequately address.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts opened the public hearing at 7:45 P.M.
Roger DePrend, Albert A. Webb & Associates, 3788 McCray Street, Riverside,
representing the applicant, advised the City Council that the applicant feels the
Planning Commission misunderstood the purpose of the conceptual site plan and the
development agreement, which was to show that this is a feasible project and it can
be built on the site at the requested density, and the issues of flood control and utilities
can be properly addressed. While doing that, other safeguards were built into the
development agreement to protect the City, such as the five-year time limit on the site
plan. The intent is to build this project as a senior project.
Councilmember Parks stated that he is concerned with the R-3 land use in between
two high schools.
Mr. DePrend advised the Council that a marketing study was done with site elevations
and it was determined that this is a suitable site. Mr. DePrend offered a copy of the
report to the Council.
Councilmember Parks stated he has no problem with the concept of the proposed
'project and he agrees with the service the applicant is trying to provide, however, he
is concerned with placing a senior development at the proposed location.
CCMINO7127193 -7- 06/02/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 97. 1993 ~-~
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to adopt
a Resolution approving Development Agreement and Tentative Parcel Map and direct
staff to prepare an Ordinance approving the Change of Zone to be added to the August
10, 1993 agenda.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Roberts
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Mur~oz
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts declared a recess at 7:55 P.M. The meeting was reconvened
at 8:20 P.M.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
15.
Ordinance Amendina Park and Recreational Facility Ooerational Policies and Reoulations
- Smoking Poli~:v for City Parks and Recreation Facilities
Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson presented the staff report.
Councilmember Stone stated that he is concerned with the enforcement issues
surrounding the proposed ordinance. Councilmember Stone also said he was not sure
that this policy should be applied to the Northwest Sports Complex which is used by
individuals who travel from outside of Temecula and may not adhere to the policy as
eagerly.
Councilmember Parks and Birdsall also expressed concern regarding the enforcement
of the ordinance. Councilmember Birdsall stated that she would not be in favor of
passing an ordinance that cannot be enforced.
Councilmember Birdsall stated that there are currently "no smoking" ordinances before
both the State and U.S. Congress, and she feels the Council should wait for those
decisions prior to setting a policy for the City of Temecula. Councilmember Birdsall
stated that she would be in favor of posting signs which state "The City of Temecula
requests that you do not smoke in this area".
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts stated he is concerned that during inclement weather, there
may not be an alternative smoking location available. Mayor Pro Tam Robarts stated
that he would support the ordinance, deleting the Northwest Sports Complex,
however, he would like to see any fines set very low.
CCMINO7127/93 -8- 08/02/83
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 97.1993
Director Nelson said the Community Services Commission's original intent was to
request voluntary compliance with the ordinance. Director Nelson advised the Council
that the Commission's first recommendation was to consider installing signs requesting
voluntary compliance. Director. Nelson suggested that the signs could be posted on
a six-month interim basis.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to instruct
staff to prepare appropriate signs to be posted at all park facilities requesting
"Voluntary Compliance" with the City's desire to establish a smoke free environment
within these areas and to table the proposed ordinance for six months to allow staff
to measure the effectiveness of the sign program.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Roberts
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Mur~oz
CITY MANAGER REPORT
City Manager David Dixon advised that the Southwest Museum has indicated a desire to
relocate from Los Angeles to Southwest Riverside County. Mr. Dixon advised that they
currently house the largest Indian Artifact Collection in the State of California. Mr. Dixon said
he has corresponded with them stating the City of Temecula would be interested in their
proposal.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
City Attorney Scott Field advised the Council that he met with the Temecula Town
Association and Shoemaker Productions concerning the Motor Speedway and it appears that
both parties are satisfied.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Stone questioned the status of speed humps.
Public Works Director Serlet advised that this item will come before the Council on the next
agenda.
CCMIN07127193 -I- 0N02193
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 97, 1993 ---,,
Councilmember Parks stated that he read in the paper that the Pechange Indians have entered
into an agreement to build · Casino and asked for Council to report back on the potential
impacts to the City of Temecula.
Councilmember Birdsall asked for consensus from the Council to send · letter to the RCTA
insupport of appointing Joan Sparkman to the Transportation Commission. The Council
indicated unanimous consensus to have e letter prepared for the Mayor's signature.
ADJOURNMENT
Chairman Roberts declared the meeting adjourned at 9:05 P.M.
The next meeting of the City of Temecula City Council will be held on August 3, 1993, at
6:00 P.M. in the Temecula City Hall Main Conference Room, regarding Council Norms, 43174
Business Park Drive, Temecule, California.
ATTEST
Mayor J. Sal Mu~oz
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CCMIN07127193 -1 O- 08/02/93
MINUTES OF A WORKSHOP MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AUGUST 3, 1993
A workshop meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 6:19 PM in the Main
Conference Room, Temecula City Hall, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temacula, California.
Mayor J. Sal Mufioz presiding.
PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs,
Stone, Mur'ioz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon and City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No public comments were offered.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
Discussion of City Council Norms. Policies and OoeratinQ Procedures
Mayor Mur~oz turned the meeting over to City Manager David Dixon who acted as
discussion facilitator. Mr. Dixon opened the discussion with an overview of the
purpose of the meeting and distributed materials that defined "norms" and gave
examples of procedures adopted by other cities.
The City Council established the following list of topics to be discussed:
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Individual City Council Projects
Notification of Alternates in the Event Council Designee is unable to attend
various meetings.
Designation of representative for various member organizations·
Reports on meetings, conferences and' seminars.
Clarification of City Council/City Staff time restrictions.
Procedures for raising issues.
City Council payment policies.
Travel policies for meetings and seminars
City Council leadership on issues and projects
Appointment of City Council representatives.
Appointments to Boards, Commissions and Committees.
Addressing public concerns raised at meetings but not on the agenda for action.
Public hearing closing and reopening policies.
Councilmembers interpersonal relations.
Minutes%2%23\93 - 1 - 08/06/93
Ciw Council Minutes February 23, 1993 ~
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
City/Press relations.'
Community Information via Press/Newsletters, etc.
Public Relations (need for spokesperson)
Staff response to Council requests.
Definition of time limits (start, finish and break times).
Public Hearing Procedures.
Dress code.
Set-up and location of City Council meetings.
Discussion of rationale for votes cast.
Time limits for Council debate.
Communication between City Manager/City Council - Information sharing,
confidentiality and deal making.
Procedures for placing matters on the agenda.
At the completion of the process of establishing the topics to be considered, the
following specific topics were discussed in depth:
1. Individual Proiects
After discussion the consensus reached was that whenever a member of the
City Council is working on a special interest project, they will inform the other
members of the City Council of that work in progress as soon as practical so
that all of the Council may stay informed.
2. Reoresentation of City
Consensus reached was that any member of the Council speaking in his/her
capacity as a City Councilmember will make positions very clear as either an
individual position or as the majority position (or officially adopted position) of
the City Council. It was also the consensus of the Council that in such an
instance the majority position will be presented first.
3. Notification of Alternates
After discussion, the consensus reached was that the City Managers staff
(Executive Assistant) will be utilized by all Councilmembers to RSVP to meeting
announcements and invitations and to notify alternates if the designee is going
to be absent.
4. Reoorts of Meetinqs. Conferences and Seminars
Consensus was reached that written materials gathered at meetings,
conferences and seminars would be shared by providing them to the City Clerk
for placement in the City Library. Councilmembers will be sent periodic reports
letting them know what new material is available in the Library.
Minutee%2%23\93 -2- 08/06/93
~ City Council Minutes FebNew 23. 1993
Councilmembers may choose to make verbal or written reports, at their
discretion, on meetings artended.
5. City Council/City Staff Time Restrictions
It was the consensus of the Council that all members are free to go directly to
Department Heads to request information or assistance. The City Manager is
to be informed by the Department Heads of Council requests and will discuss
it with the Councilmember if required time or cost to meet the request is
significant enough to merit full Council consideration and approval. It was also
determined that the norm will be, the City Manager advises a Councilmember
as soon as possible of any concerns or problems involved in meeting a Council
request, that are relayed to him by staff.
6. Issue Raisinc;
Consensus reached was that when an established norm is perceived to have
been deviated from, the issue will be discussed internally by Councilmembers
on a one-to-one basis to resolve the conflict. If accord cannot be reached the
matter should then be discussed with the City Manager.
7. City Council Absences
Council consensus was that all absences resulting from a member being out of
town on City business should be compensated at the regular rate and that up
to three (3) absences that are not related to City business would also be
allowed.
8. Travel. MeetincJs/Seminars
The consensus reached was meetings that have pre-approved through normal
budgeting processes, or that are held within the State of California do not need
formal approval from the full Council. Unanticipated out-of-state travel should
be brought to the Council for approval. Also the consensus of the Council was
that attendance at annual out-of-state meetings will be rotated by the
members.
After a brief discussion, it was decided to schedule a continuation of this meeting to address
the remaining topics on September 7, 1993 to be held in the Main Conference Room at City
Hall beginning at 6:00 PM.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to adjourn
at 9:26 PM to the next regularly scheduled meeting to be held at 7:00 PM on August 1 O,
Minutes\2%23%93 -3- 08/06/93
City Council Minutes ' FebNew 23. 1993 ~-~,
1993, at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. The
motion was unanimously carried.
ATTEST:
J. Sal Muftoz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Minutes%2~23\93 -4- 08/06/93
ITEM NO.
3
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EJiHIKII' A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DE'I'ER_MIh~ AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been
audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of
$1,004,353.69
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOFrED, this 24th day of August, 1993.
ATYF_.ST:
I. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SF, AL]
R~sos 327
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMF_,CULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 93-._ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Temecula on the 24th day of August, 1993 by the following roll call vote:
AYHS:
NOE:
ABSENT:
CO~CIL.M~ERS:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
CO~CII,lVW~F. RS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Ruos 327
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
08/05/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
08/12/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
08/24/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
08/12/93 TOTAL PAYROLL:
$95,389.07
$292,153.69
$509,537.24
$107,273.69
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 08/24/93 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001
100
190
191
192
193
210
250
280
~z0
330
340
GENERAL
GAS TAX FUND
TCSD
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-.CIP
INSURANCE FUND
VEHICLES FUND
INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS
COPY CENTER FUND
FACILITIES
PAYROLL:
001
100
190
191
193
280
300
320
330
GENERAL (PAYROLL)
GAS TAX FUND (PAYROLL)
TCSD (PAYROLL)
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A (PAYROLL)
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C (PAYROLL)
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP (PAYROLL)
INSURANCE FUND (PAYROLL}
INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PAYROLL)
COPY CENTER FUND (PAYROLL)
TOTAL BY FUND:
$260,177.13
$37,512.20
$49,836.20
$4,157.00
$17, 103.62
$26,200.67
$93,252.45
$356,691.39
$3,547.11
$5,777.34
$639.93
$5,342.16
$6,038.15
$30,804.85
$65,356.59
$13,919.17
$22,750.98
$393.72
$1,523.40
$238.98
$534.17
$1,132.00
$1,424.68
$1,004,353.63
$897,080.00
$107,273.69
$1,004,353.68
,HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
VOUCHRE2 PAr, E,` 7
08/05/~ 14: 29
C]TY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 COleIUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERV]CE LEVEL A
193 TCSD $ERV/CE LEVEL C
210 CAPZTAL Z!IPROVEHENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPIIENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORNATION SYSTENS
330 COPY CENTER FUND
3~,0 FACiLiTiES
TOTAL
ANOUNT
37,557.45
3,604.10
11,108.11
2,574.87
1,910.28
271
492.00
897.04
2,758.17
3,848.45
30,367.26
95,389.07
08 3
14:29
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
11406
11406
11406
11407
11408
11412
11413
11414
11414
11414
11414
11414
11414
11414
11414
11416
11417
11417
11417
11418
11418
11418
11419
11419
11420
11420
11420
11420
11420
11420
11420
11420
11421
11421
11421
CHECK
DATE
08/02/93
08/02/93
08/02/93
08/04/93
08/04/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
VENDOR
NUN8ER
000249
000249
000249
O001z~
0001/,4
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000125
000126
000131
000131
000131
000156
000156
000156
000168
000168
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000184
000184
000184
VENOOR
NAME
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
COSTCO WHOLESALE
COSTCO WHOLESALE
GABLE, LARRY
PERUSSE, LORI
AVP VISION PLAN
AVP VISION PLAN
AVP VISION PLAN
AVP VISION PLAN
AVP VISION PLAN
AVP VISION PLAN
AVP VISION PLAN
AVP VISION PLAN
CALED
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CARL WARREN & CO.
CARL WARREN & CO.
CARL WARREN & CO.
DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA
DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA
DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA
TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL
TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENN[ES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GTE
GTE
GTE
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TCSD PETTY CASH
TCSD PETTY CASH
TCSD PETTY CASH
TV & VCR FOR SENIOR CEN
OFFICE FURNITURE FOR SE
REFUND B&S/GABLE, LARRY
TCSD REFUND/PERUSSE, LO
PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93
PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93
PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93
PREN1UR FOR AUGUST 93
PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93
PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93
PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93
PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93
93-94 MEMBERSHIP DUES
INSTALLATION OF REDkKX)D
CHRISIT LANE
CYNTHIA CASTILLO
MARY COX
PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93
PREMIUM FOR AUCIJST 93
AOMINISTRATIVE FEES
FLOWERS/CONGRESSMAN
FLCYe/ERS
NUMBERING MACHINE
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES;
5X8 U.S. FLAG; COTTON
5X8 STATE FLAG; COTTON
TAX
MISC, OFFICE SUPPLIES;
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES;
NISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES;
909-699-2309
909-695-3539
909-694-1989
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
1~0-183-~-5320
1~0-183-~-5370
1~0-183-~-53~0
190-180-999-5242
190-180-999-5242
001-2660
190-183-4986
001-;?.310
100-2310
190-2310
191-2310
193-2310
300-2310
330-2310
001-1180
001-110-999-5226
193-180-999-5510
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
001-2340
100-23~0
001-150-999-5250
001-100-999-5250
001-2170
001-170-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
3~0-199-999-5242
340-199-999-5242
3~0-199-999-5242
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
ITEM
AMOUNT
100.85
56.81
63.7'3
723.94
173.73
33.00
399.09
120.77
97.15
4.14
5.06
3.94
31.50
24.95
250.00
620.00
203.13
258.88
206.63
29.86
14.93
15.00
54.95
62.50
28.24
38.35
118.00
178.00
22.94
21.55
223.12
24.73
19.04
22.86
2,139.45
CHECK
221.39
723.94
173.73
33.00
686.60
250.00
620.00
59.79
117.45
654.93
2,181.35
11/,2-2, 08/05/93 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INV 229937 lg0-180-~-5301 32.33
1f 08/05/93 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INVOICE 229938 190-180-999-5301 41.48
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA
08105193 16:29 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERICOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEN ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NLliER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AHOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
11422 08/05/93 000186 HANKS HARDMARE
NISC HARDWARE AND $UPPL 190-180-999-5212
153.73
227.56
'11423 08/05/93 000203 JOBS AVAILABLE SR MAOBT ANALYST 001-150-999-5254
83.20
83.20
11426 08/05/93 000209 L & N FERTILIZER
NISC LANDSP SUPPLYS 190-180-999-5242
136.91
136.91
11625 08/05/93 000217 HARGAR]TA OFFICIALS ASS 4TH OF JULY SOFTBALL GA 190-183-999-5380
11625 08/05/93 000217 NARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS ADULT SOFTBALL GAMES, 190-183-999-5380
250.80
308.00
558.80
11426 08/05/93 000224 MELAD &ASSOC]ATES
PLAN CHECKS FOR JULY 93 001-162-999-5268
319.21
319.21
11627 08/05/93 000238 FINAL TOUCH MARKETING FY 93'94'; MARKETING PR 280-199-999-5264
692. O0
492.00
11428 08/05/93 000263 PAYLESS DRUG STORE FILM 190-180-999-5250
11428 08/05/93 000243 PAYLESS DRUG STORE FILH PROCESSING 190-180-999-5250
11628 08/05/93 000243 PAYLESS ORUG STORE FILN AND FILN PROCESSIN 001-162-999-5250
31.81
6.~
62.12
11629 08/05/93 000265 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN AUGUST PERS HEALTH 001-20~0
11629 08/05/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR,PREN AUGUST PER$ HEALTH 100-2090
11629 08/05/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH INGUR.PREN AUGUST PERS HEALTH 190-2090
11629 08/05/93 OO0245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR,PREN AUGUST PERS HEALTH 191-2090
11629 08/05/93 OOO265 PERS (HEALTH INSUR,PREN AUGUST PERS HEALTH lf3-2090
11429 08/05/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN AUGUST PERS HEALTH 300-2090
11629 08/05/93 000265 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN AUGUST PERS HEALTH 330-20g~)
11429 08/05/93 000265 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN ADMINISTRATIVE FEES 001-150o999-5250
11430 08/05/93 000268 PETROLANE FUEL 190-180-999-5263
11630 08/05/93 000268 PETROLANE FUEL 001-162-999-5263
11430 08/05/93 000268 PETROLANE FUEL 190-180-999-5263
13,750.19
3,116.7'9
3,138.35
135.95
469.74
207.7'5
?25.04
105.48
30.97
215.91
82.12
21,649.27
329.00
11431 08/05/93 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH-TCSD 1~0-183-~-5340
11431 08/05/93 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH-TCSO 190-183-999-5320
11431 08/05/95 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH CITY 320-199-99f-5221
11431 08/05/93 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH CITY 001-161-~9-5226
11431 08/05/93 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH CITY 330-199-999-5230
11431 08/05/93 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH CITY 001-140-999-5260
11431 08/05/93 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH CITY 001-162-999-5258
11431 08/05/93 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH CITY 001-163-999-5268
11431 08/05/93 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH CITY 001-150-999-5260
11431 08/05/93 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH CITY 001-150-999-5262
11431 08/05/93 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH CITY 001-163-999-5260
152.87
14.72
15.96
18.29
92.12
40. O0
6.76
13.76
6.65
25.76
58.05
11432 08/05/93 000268 R]V. CO. HABITAT CORSER JULY K-RAT 001-2300 3,978.00
3,978.00
11433 08/05/93 000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY QRT 2365 5X3 2 DOOR BUL 001-120-999-5220
11433 08/05/93 000269 RIVERSlOE OFFICE SUPPLY TAX 001-120-999-5220
265.50'
20.58
11434 08/05/93 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE MANAGEMENT ANALYTS
001-150-999-5256
355.20
355.20
11435 08/05/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY 500/BUSINESS CARDS;SOLD 001-130-999-5266 36.00
11435 08/05/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY TAX 001-130-999-5266 2.79
vou~2
08/ 14:29
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
11436 08/05/93
11437 08/05/93
11438 08/05/93
11439 08/05/93
11440 08/05/93
11441 08/05/93
11442 08/05/93
11443 08/05/93
11444 08/05/93
11445 08/05/93
11446 08/05/93
1' 08/05/93
11447 08/05/93
11448 08/05/93
11449 08/05/93
11450 08/05/93
11451 08/05/93
11451 08/05/93
11451 08/05/93
11451 08/05/93
11452 08/05/93
11453 08/05/93
11454 08/05/93
11455 08/05/93
11456 08/05/93
11457 08/05/93
11458 08/05/93
11t 38/05/93 000754
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
000307 TEMECULA TROPHY
000312 TEMECULA VALLEY PLAYHOU
000320 T(3~/N CENTER STATIONERS
000322 UNIGLORE BUTTERFIELD TR
000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
0003/,2 WINOSOR PARTNERS - RANC
000345 XEROX CORPORAT/ON BILL/
0003~6 YATES, GRANT
000358 DIXON, DAVID F.
000366 HARRINGTON, KEVIN
000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
000380
000382
000399
000423
000430
000430
000430
000430
000459
000488
000557
000558
000653
000678
LAIDLAW TRANSIT
RAGING WATERS
NUNICIPAL NGNT ASSIST,S
H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU
ITEN
DESCRIPTION
PLAQUES FOR gINTER SPRI
CS FUNDING
STAMP PADS
AIRFARE/CONF./SN
REED & STERLING ONIFORN
CAM/JULY RENT & T] AUGU
LEASE COPIES/AUG.
REIMB/RECYCLING SEMINAR
RE[NB/REDEVELOPIENT BEN
REIIqB SPORTS TURF SENIN
6/Z5-7/26
6/25-7/26
BUS TRANSPORTATION TO S
15 ADMISS]ONS FOR TRIP
16TH ANNUAL CONF/LUCI R
CRAFT BOOK
GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93
GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93
GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93
GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93
TUMBLE JUMBLE
KNOTT~S BERRY FARM SUMMER DAY CAMP
JOHNSON REPEATER
ADVANCED NOaILCOM!q
LUCKY STORE
RIVERSIDE OO, HEALTH SE
000724 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PR!
ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
80~ CONTRACT CLASS GYMN
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-183-999-5380
001 - 100-999- 5267
001-163-999-5220
001 - 100-999-5258
190-180-999-5243
340-199-999-52~
330-199-999-5239
001 - 140-999-5262
001-110-999-5258
190-180-999-5258
191-180-999-5319
191 - 180-999-5240
190-183-999-5~0
190-1&3-954-5300
001-150-999-5261
190-182-999-5301
001-2510
100-2510
190-2510
300-2510
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5340
MONTHLY PALONAR BASE, M 320-199-999-5209
MONTHLY ELSINORE BASE U 320-199-999-5209
SUPPLIES/COOKIE MONSTER
4/1-6/30/93 VECTOR CONT
DAY CAMP/4TH OF JULY T-
PROVIDE LANDSCAPE AND I
:
190-18]-999-5330
001-162-999-5250
190-18]-999-5380
193-180-999-5250
ITEN
AMOUNT
158.39
10,000.00
34.48
139,00
13.60
30,1348.32
2,938.11
55.8~
32.05
50.00
1,938.32
.11-
405.00
224.25
95.00
14.93
254.20
22.80
89.00
2.50
868.80
1,080.25
186.00
204.60
35.00
279.40
490.37
225.00
PAGE 4
CHECK
AMOUNT
158.39
10,000.00
34.48
139.00
13.60
30,048.32
2,958.11
55.8~
32,05
50.00
1,938.21
405.00
224.25
95.00
14.95
368.50
1,080.25
186.00
204.60
35.00
279.40
490.37
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/05/93 16:29 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
5
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUNIIER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
ANOUNT
CHEC~
AIRGUIlT
11659 08/05/93 000756 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE PROVIDE LANDSCAPE AND I 190-180'999-5250
225.00
450.00
11660 08/05/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93 001-2360
11460 08/05/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93 100-2360
11660 08/05/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93 190-2360
11660 08/05/93 000765 GROUP AHERICA PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93 191-2360
11660 08/05/93 000765 OROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93 193-2360
11460 08/05/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR AUGLIST 93 300-~360
11660 08/05/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93
11660 08/05/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR AUC~JST 93 330-2360
11660 08/05/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93 001-~380
11660 08/05/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93 100-~380
11660 08/05/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PRENILe4 FOR AUGUST 93 190-2380
11660 08/05/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93 191-2380
11~60 08/05/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93 193-2380
11~60 08/05/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93 300-2380
11460 08/05/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93 320-2380
11460 08/05/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93 330-2380
11660 08/05/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93 001-2500
11660 08/05/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93 100-2500
11660 08/05/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93 190-2500
11460 08/05/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93 191-2500
11460 08/05/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93 193-2500
11660 08/05/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 93 300-2500
11460 08/05/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMILIN FOR AUGUST 93 320-2500
11660 08/05/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR AUOUST*93 330-2500
569.99
99.75
123.50
4.28
16.72
6.76
9.50
19.00
938.34
188.11
185.02
5.89
20.91
7.76
18.67
18.59
203.25
40.95
60.70
1.30
6.60
1.71
6.11
6.09
2,529.50
11461 08/05/93 000795 PRYOR RESOURCES, XNC. BUSINESS HRITING SENINA 001-150-999-5261
169.00
169.00
11462 08/05/93 000841 PRO(D, INC.
PROHONE 93 SOFTHARE UPG 320-199-999-5221
138.00
138.00
11463 08/05/93 000843 McDANIEL ENGINEERING CO BRIDGE INSPECTOR DURING 001-1990
475.60
47~.60
11464 08/05/93 000914 CNOA DRUG ABUSE RECOGNITION 001-170-g9~-5261
450.00
650.00
11465 08/05/93 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINT SERVICES 001-163-999-5268
11465 08/05/93 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINT SERVICES 210-199-801-5802
11465 08/05/93 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINT SERVICES 210-190-131-5804
70.35
19.20
252.16
341.69
11466 08/05/93 000980 COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY MARKING FLAG ORANGE 190-180-999-5212
43.10
43.10
11467 08/05/93 001037 FALLBROOK LANDSCAPE & M LAND MAINT. JULY
193-180-9~-5615
550.25
550.25
11468 08/05/93 001047 BOAT TECH CLUTCH CABLE 001-170-999-5214
43.16
43.16
11469 08/05/93 001057 PRO-SCAPE, INC. IRRIGATION TECHNICIAN 191-180-999-5415
11469 08/05/93 001057 PRO-SCAPE, INC. LABOR FOR REPAIRS 191-180-999-5415
11469 08/05/93 001057 PRO-SCAPE, INC. MATERIALS 191-180-999-5415
11469 08/05/93 001057 PRO-SCAPE, INC. ANNUAL MAINT JULY 93 191-180-999-5415
11470 08/05/93 001066 ROADRUNNER TRACTORING WORK AT PALA COIN PARK 190-180-999-5250
21.00
84.00
42.69
337.41
400.00
485.10
bo
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NLINBER
11471
11472
11473
11474
11475
11476
14:29
CHECK
DATE
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
08/05/93
VENDOR
NUMBER
001077
001078
001079
001081
001082
001083
VENDOR
NAME
CALI FORN/A ROSTER
UIEC RECORDS & INFO. NG
BEST WESTERN NOTEL
CANE LOT
CONSOL]DATED WASTE
MALTA, CARMALITA
CITY OF TEMEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
]TEN
DESCRIPTION
ROSTER FOR CITY LIBRARY
ATTENDANCE OF SEMINAR
LODGIHG/CBOA DRUG SENIN
SUI4NER DAY CAMP
GASOLINE SPILL
REWARD
TOTAL CHECKS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-120-999-5228
001 - 120 - 999 - 5260
001-170-999-5261
1~0-11G-;-5340
001-1270
001-171)-999-5285
ITEM
AMOUNT
14.00
65.00
106.82
536.25
2,662.93
250.00
PAGE 6
CHECK
AMOUNT
14.00
65,00
106.82
536.25
2,662.93
250.00
95,389.07
VOUCHRE2
08/12/~rJ 15:02
CITY OF TEIqECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 COHHUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD
280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FUND
320 ZNFORHATIOR SYSTEMS
330 COPY CENTER FUND
3~0 FACILITIES
TOTAL
AMOUNT
174,914.36
21,283.85
18,689.40
1,0~1.13
17,103.62
2,552.23
~9,717.Z~
365.39
1 ,~2.~3
209.53
63~.~3
2,583.99
1,002.70
~37.39
292,153.69
U/~2 CITY OF TENECULA
15:02 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUNBER DATE NUNBER NANE DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
ANOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
11477 08/10/93 001092 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERI RANTEK/INTERPLEAD NOTIO 001-2030
11477 08/10/93 001092 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERI RAHTEK/INTERPLEAD MOTIO 100-2030
114,5~8.13
6,416.58
120,984.71
1147~ 08/11/93 000253 POSTNASTER
POSTAGE FOR OCOUPATIOR 280-199-~-5264
1,571
1,571.93
233708 08/12/93 00028] FIRSTAX (ZRS) 00028~ FICA
233708 08/12/93 000283 FIRSTAX ([RS) 000283 FICA
233708 08/12/93 00028] FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FZCA
233708 08/12/93 00028] FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FICA
233708 08/12/93 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028] FICA
233708 08/12/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028:5 FICA
233708 08/12/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FICA
233708 08/12/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FICA
233708 08/12/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028~ FICA
233708 08/12/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 USIT
233708 08/12/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 US]T
233708 08/12/93 000283 FIRSTAX (]RS) 000283 USIT
233708 08/12/93 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 US]T
233708 08/12/93 00028] FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028] USIT
233708 08/12/93 00028] FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 USIT
233708 08/lZ/93 00028] FIRSTAX (IRS) 000285 US/T
23~/''' 08/lZ/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028] US/T
233 08/12/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028] USIT
flIED
fIRED
fMED
FMED
rMED
PNED
q~ED
fMED
001 - 2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
2,3/,3.67
501.44
777.89
14.22
52.46
3.74
17.75
42.20
45.14
9,908.03
2,304.16
66.48
199,95
12.40
50.24
232.50
75.60
19,494.09
275698 08/12/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 CAIT
273698 08/12/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 CAIT
273698 08/12/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0002~4 CAZT
273698 08/12/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 CAIT
273698 08/12/93 0004~4 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~4 CAIT
273698 08/12/93 000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004/~ CAIT
273698 08/12/93 000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 000/,44 CAIT
273698 08/12/93 000~44 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000/~4 CAIT
273698 08/12/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 CAIT
273698 08/12/93 0004~4 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~4
273698 08/12/93 000~4~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI
273698 08/12/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDZ
273698 08/12/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004/~ SDI
273698 08/12/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SOl
273698 08/12/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EOD) 000444 SOl
273698 08/12/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~ SDI
2736~8 08/12/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000/~ SDI
273698 08/12/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~ SD!
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
2,460.93
549.91
488.94
16.28
36.24
.94
9.33
50.61
13.59
753.73
155.78
315.43
23.53
2.72
7.96
18.92
20
4,931.43
11483 08/12/93 FISCHER, MARY
REFUND OVERPAYMENT 001-2650
4.00
4,00
1148/, 08/12/93
TEMECULA UNITED METHODI REFUND OVERPAYMENT 001-161-4129
2.55
2.55
11485 08/12/93 000101 APPLE ONE
LITTRELL k/E 07/10/93 001-140-~-5118
312.00
312.00
114,~ 08/12/93 000105 AEI SECURITY, INC. ALARM MONITORING; CITY 340-199-999-5250 105.00
11 08/12/95 000105 AEI SECURITY, INC. ALARM MORITOR]NG; BLOG- 340'199'999'5250 105.00 210.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA
08/12/93 15:02 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NIJMBER DATE NLINBER MANE DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
CHECK
AMOUNT
11487 08/12/93 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER 2 SPECIAL SIGNS FOR CIT 100-164-999-5244
11487 08/12/93 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER 2 SPECIAL SIGNS FOR CIT 100-164-999-5244
102.]&
96.97
199.33
11488 08/12/93 000160 COLONIAL LIFE & ACC]DEN PREM PAYMENT FOR AUGUST 001-2330
11488 08112193 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACC]DEN PREM PAYMENT FOR AUGUST 100-2330
11488 08/12/93 000160 COLONIAL LIFE & ACC]DEN PREN PAYMENT FOR AUGUST 190-2330
11488 08/12/93 000160 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN PREN PAYMENT FOR AUGUST 191-2330
11688 08/12/93 000160 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN PREM PAYMENT FOR AUGUST 193-2330
11488 08/12/93 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN PREM PAYMENT FOR AUGUST 330-2330
130.75
9.75
132.00
11
16.02
45. O0
343.00
11489 08/12/93 000155 DAVLIN AUDIO/VIDEO 7113 CITY C 001-100-999-5250
11489 08/12/93 000155 DAVL]N JULY 19, PLAN 001-161-999-5250
11689 08/12/93 000155 DAVLIN AUDIO/VIDEO CITY COUNCI 001-100-999-5250
11689 08/12/93 000155 DAVLIN AUG. 2 PLAN 001-161-999-5250
721 .iS0
150.00
696.23
150.00
1,717.83
11690 08/12/93 000162 EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTWA 155671 ]NTEL NETPORT II
11690 08/12/93 000162 EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTIdA FREIGHT
1149O 08/12/93 000162 EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFT~A TAX
320-1~-~-5221
320-1~-~-5221
320-1~-~-5221
383.00
8.50
29.69
621.19
11491 08/12/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT M[SC OFFICE SUPPLIES
11491 08/12/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT CABINET
11491 08/12/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRUDUCT M[SC. OFFICE SUPPLIES;
001-161-~-5220
1~0-180-~-5220
001-140-~9-5220
11492 08/12/93 000184 GTE 909-69~-8632 JULY 93 320-1~-~-5208
97.79
64.47
15.03
17.68
"""~9
17.48
11493 08/12/93 000186 HANKS HARDWARE
11493 08/12/93 000186 HANKS HARDWARE
MlSC. NAINT. SUPPLIES 100-164-999-5218
MISC. SHALL TOOLS & EQU 340-199-999-5242
134.53
60.39
194.92
11694 08/12/93 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
11494 08/12/93 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
11496 08/12/93 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
11696 08/12/93 000192 GLOBAL COIqPUTER SUPPLIE
C9605 IBM CONP 101KEYB 320-199-999-5221
C18~8V DATA CARTRIDGE O 320-199-999-5221
FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221
TAX 320-199-999-5221
269.70
91.75
11.51
28.55
601.51
11495 08/12/93 000196 ICNA RETIREMENT 000196 DEF CONP 001-2080
11495 08/12/93 000196 ICNA RETIREMENT 000194 OEF COMP 100-2080
11695 08/12/93 000194 ICIqA RETIREMENT 000196 DEF CONP 190-2080
11495 08/12/93 00019~ ICMA RETIREMENT 000194 DEF CONP 191-2080
11495 08/12/93 000194 ICNA RETIREMENT 000196 DEF COMP 193-2080
11495 08/12/93 000194 ICMA RETIREMENT 000196 DEF CONP 280-2080
11495 08/12/93 000194 ]CNA RETIREMENT 00019/, OEF COMP 300-2080
11695 08/12/93 000194 ICNA RETIREMENT 000194 DEF CONP 330-2080
2,808.82
564.16
708.11
36.08
41
41.20
3.75
50.00
6,251.78
11496 08/12/93 000205 KIDS PARTIES, ETC.
RENTAL/SNOU CONE MACH]N 190-183-~-5320
37.71
37.71
11497 08/12/93 000209 L & M FERTILIZER MlSC HANDWARE 100-164-999-5218
11698 08/12/93 000213 LOCAL GOVERNMENT CONHiS LIVEABLE PLACES UPDATE 001-161-999-5228
18.00
18.00
116~ 08/12/93 000216 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING CC MEETING 001-100-{~-5260
11500 08/12/93 0002/,6 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETiREM 000266 PER REDE 001-2130
80.00
107.35
80,00
CITY OF TENECULA
15:02 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUHBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
11500 08/12/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 PER REDE 100-2130
11500 08/12/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 001-2390
11500 08/12/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 PERS RET 100-2390
11500 08/12/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 PERS RET 190-2390
11500 08/lZ/93 0002~6 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 191-2390
11500 08/12/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 PERS RET 193-2390
11500 08/12/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000266 PERS RET 300'2390
11500 08/12/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000266 PERS RET 320-2390
11500 08/12/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000266,6 PERS RET 330-2390
11500 08/lZ/93 000246 PER$ EMPLOYEES' RET]REM 000266 SURVIVOR 001-2390
11500 08/12/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 100-2390
11500 08/12/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REM 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390
11500 08/12/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REN 000246 SURVIVOR 191-2390
11500 08/12/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RET%REM 000246 SURVIVOR 19]-2390
11500 08/12/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390
11500 08/12/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000266 SURVIVOR 320-2390
11500 08/12/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390
107.35
11,179.22
2,198.71
2,073.14
70,86
247.13
90.79
218.52
220.00
53.16
9.76
12.09
.42
1,64
.46
.93
1,86
16,593.19
11501 08/12/93 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS NAIL 001-163-999-5230
11501 08/12/93 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS NAIL 001-161-999-5230
08/12/93 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE SR Iru/4T ANALYST & NAINT 001-150-999-5254
19.90
13.95
455.49
33.85
455.49
11503 08/12/93 000262 RANCHO HATER '6/07-7/08 250-190-129-580~
11503 08/12/93 000262 RANCHO HATER '6/07-7/08 190-180-999-5240
11503 08/12/93 000262 RANCHO HATER '6/07-7/08 193-180-999-5240
11503 08/12/93 000262 RANCHO HATER '6/07-7/08 191-180-999-5240
11503 08/12/93 000262 RANCHO HATER OVERPAYMENT OF FEES REF 001-2650
115.39
2,543.52
1,690.22
150.16
200.00
4,699.Z9
1150A 08/12/93 000266 RIGHTHAY JULY/AUG TOILET RENTAL 100-164-999-5238
57.39
57.39
11505 08/12/93 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T OIL CHANGE
310-164-999-5214
26.28
26.28
11506 08/12/93 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS. JULY 93 001-2370 13,712.77
11506 08/12/93 000294 STATE CUMPENSATION INS. JULY 93 100-2370 6,020.41
11506 08/12/93 000294 STATE CONPENSATION INS. JULY 93 190-2370 6,286.51
11506 08/12/93 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS. JULY 93 193-2370 245.58
11506 08/12/93 000294 STATE CONPENSATION INS. JULY 93 320-2370 334,27
11506 08/12/93 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS. JULY 93 330-2370 515.03
11506 08/12/93 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS. JULY 9~ 001-1182 99.57
11506 08/12/93 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS. JULY 93 191-2370 650,79
27,864.93
11507 08/12/93 000306 TENECULA VALLEY PIPE NARLE4X 190-180-999-5212
22.57
22.57
11508 08/12/93 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY POOL TROPHIES 190-183-999-5380
64.10
64.10
11509 08/12/93 000308 TEMECULA TO~NE ASSOClAT LOCKER RENTAL 190-180-999-5238
11509 08/12/93 000308 TENEOULA TiE ASSOC]AT SET UP AND CLEANING FOR 001-100-999-5234
15.00
7~.00
739.00
115.3~z- 08/12/93 000320 TOHN CENTER STATIONERS SMOOTH STROKE LAMP 001-16~-999-5220 42.02
11 08/12/93 000320 TO~I CENTER STATIONERS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-163-999-5220 264.15
P 4
VOUCHRE2 ~
08/12/93 15:02
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUNBER
11510
11511
11512
11512
11512
11513
11513
11513
11514
11514
11515
11515
11516
11516
11517
11517
11517
11518
11518
11519
11520
11521
11522
11523
11523
11524
11525
11525
11525
11525
11526
11526
11527
11527
CHECK
DATE
08/12/93
08/12/93
08/12/93
08/12/93
08/12/93
08/12/93
08/12/93
00/12/'F5
08/12/93
08/12/93
08/12/93
08/12/93
08/12/93
08/12/93
08/1Z/93
00/12/93
08/12/93
08/12/93
08/12/93
00112193
08/12/93
08/12/93
08/12/93
00/12/93
00/12/93
08/12/93
08/12/93
08/12/93
08/12/93
00/12/93
08/12/93
08/12/93
08/12/93
08/12/93
VENDOR VENDOR
NUNBER NANE
000320 TO~N CENTER STATIONERS
000322 UNIGLOBE BUTTERFIELD TR
CITY OF TENEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEN ACCOUNT
DESCRIPTION NUNBER
OPEN PURCHASE ORDER FOR 190-180-999-5220
AIRLINE/LCCAC P BIRDSAL 001-100-999-5258
000325 UNITED MAY OF THE ]NLAN 000325
000325 UNITED MAY OF THE ]NLAN 000325
000325 UNITED MAY OF THE ]NLAN 000325
000326
000326
000326
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
000340 gHITE CAP
000~0 gHITE CAP
IN 001-2120
tm 190-2120
tN 300-2120
2 SETS OF UNIFORIqS CLEA
2 SETS OF UNIFORNS CLEA
UN/FORN RENTAL
100-164-999-5243
100-164-~-5243
1~0-180-~-5243
HAND GRINDER, GRINDING 100-164-999-5242
HAND GRINDER, GRINDING 100-164-999-5242
000~89 USCM/PEBSCO, C00RA) 000389 PT RETIR 100-21&0
000389 USCN/PEBSCO, COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 1~0-2160
000423 H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU
00042~ H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU
000/47 CONTRONIX OF HENET
000447 COIqTRONIX OF HENET
000447 CONTRON]X OF HENET
000471 IGOE & CONPANY
000471 IGOE & CONPANY
000473 CALIFORN]A REDEVELOPHEN
000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONN
000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
000574 SUPER TONER
000574 SUPER TONER
000587 IqUNOZ, NARIO
000642 CITY OF TEHECULA - FLEX
000642 CITY OF TEHECULA - FLEX
000642 CITY OF TEIECULA - FLEX
000642 CITY OF TENECULA - FLEX
000645 SNART & FINAL
000(~45 SMART & FINAL
000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL
000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL
HISC REC SUPPLIES
MX)DBURING KIT
190-180-999-5301
190-182-999-5301
5 OUTSIDE SPEAKERS TO B 310-164-~-5214
IHSTALLATION 310-164-999-5214
TAX 310-164-999-5214
FLEX PLAN ADNIN FEE JUL 001-150-999-5250
SET UP FEE 001-150-999-5250
CITIZEN GUIDE TO REDEV 001-140-999-5228
FOOTING INSPECTZON/FINA 250-190-129-5804
JULY SERVICE
340-19~-~-5212
43 77 077 5200 01
192-180-~-5500
HP If/LASERJET TONER C 320-1f9-999-5221
TAX 320-1~9-~99-5221
CARPET CLEANING SERVICE 340-199-~-5212
8/12/93 001-1020
8/12/93 190-1020
8/i2/93 100-1020
8/12/93 330-1020
TU!qBLER & CAN LINER
MISC SUPPLIES
lf0-180-~-5301
190-182-~-5301
FUEL 190-180-~9-5263
FUEL 100-164-~-5263
ITEN
NqOIJNT
118.56
138.00
86.50
17.50
.50
12.50
12.50
13.60
221.65
16.16
90.00
33.87
30.81
337.50
250.00
26.15
294.00
510.00
6.86
250.00
42.00
17,103.62
495.00
38.36
100.00
2,655.30
516.66
50.00
16.25
20.02
59.86
362.03
CHECK
AIqQUNT
424.73
138,00
104.50
38.&0
237.81
613.65
804.00
6.86
250.00
42.00
17, 103.62
533.36
1OO.OO
3,238.21
VGUC~.,2 PAGE 5
08/' 15: 02
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUNBER DATE NUNBER NANE
11527 08/12/93 00070~ SKS, INC,/INLAND OIL
11528 08/12/93 0007/*7 PLANNERS BOOKSTORE
11529 08/lZ/93 000757 CONCISE CONSTRUCTION
11529 08/12/93 000757 CONCISE CONSTRUCTION
11530 08/12/93 000878 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
11531 08/12/93 000888 TEAGARDEN FUEL TENDER
11532 08/12/93 000950 CALIFORNIAN - DISPLAY
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM ACCOUNT
DESCR]PTION NUNltER
FUEL 001-162-~-5263
REGULATORY BARRIERS TO 001-161-~-5228
PROGRESS THROUGH 7/2~ 210-1~0
RETENTION 210-2035
REFUND OVERPAYHENT 001-Z~50
FUEL USAGE DURING FL(XI) 001-166-~-5218
JOB ANNOUNCENENT FOR OF 001-150-~-525/*
11533 08/12/93 001001 VAN GAALE CONSTRUCTION, R.O.W. lIED NOI4]NG
11534 08/12/93 001050 SETON MANEPLATE FLUORESCENT PAPER ROLL
100-164-~-5/*02
1153/* 08/12/~3 001050 SETON NANEPLATE
001-162-~-5222
TAX 001-162-~-5222
DEF CONP 001-2080
DEF CONP 100-2080
DEF CONP 1~0-2080
DEF CONP 300-2080
DEF COlqP 320-2080
11535 08/12/93 001065 USCN/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065
11535 08/12/93 001065 USCN/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065
11535 08/12/93 001065 USClq/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065
11r''''' 08/12/93 001065 USCN/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065
11. 08/12/93 001065 USCN/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065
11536 08/12/93 001087 BRIAN COX NECHANICAL CK AIR CONDITIONING/CAS :r~0-1~-~-5212
11537 08/12/93 001088 RORY RIECK TRACTOR MORK HAKE FIRE BREAK//*TH OF 190-180-~-5250
11538 08/lZ/93 001089 CALIFORNIA DEBT ADV]SOR BASICS OF CASH-FLOt/FIN 001-140-~-5258
11539 08/12/93 001090 CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF GEN PLANNING, ZONING & DEVE 001-161-999-5228
TOTAL CHECKS
l TEN
ANOUNT
/*2.53
17.00
55,241 ./,0
5,524.16-
4.35
6,2/,7.50
28.16
980. O0
115.&4
7.63
2,430.05
222.98
2:16.32
28.75
312.50
25.00
350,00
200.00
18.00
CHECK
ANOUNT
459.20
17.00
4.35
6,247.50
28.16
980.00
123.27
3,230.60
25.00
350,00
200.00
18,00
292,153.69
VOUCHRE2
08/12/93
16:06
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
P~ 3
FUMD TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 COHHUNZTY SERVZCES D]STRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL It4PROVEleENT PROJ FUND
250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD
280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - C]P
300 INSURANCE FUND
330 COPY CENTER FUND
TOTAL
N4OUNT
67,705.32
12,626.25
20,038.69
561.00
21,738.16
63,263.87
356,326.00
1,622.18
6,670.77
1,187.00
509,537 · 26
VOUCh2 PAGE 1
08/' 16:04
CITY OF TENECtJLA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
VENDOR
IMNE
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMCXJNT
11541 08/24/93 00012.:3
11541 08/24/93 000123
11541 08/24/93 00012]
11541 08/24/93 0001~
11541 08/24/93 000123
11541 08/24/93 000123
BURKE H/LLIANS & SORENS
BURKE HILLIANS & $ORENS
BURKE HILLIANS & SORENS
BURKE HILLIAMS & SORENS
BURKE HILLIANS & SORENS
BURKE HILLIAMS & SORENS
ATTORNEY SERVICES
ATTY SERVICES JUNE 93
ATTY SERVICES JUNE 93
ATTY SERVICES JUNE 93
ATTY SERVICES JUNE 93
ATTNY SERVICES/CABLE TV
001-130-999-52~6
001-1280
190-180-999-5246
300-199-999-5207
001-130-999-5246
001-130-999-5266
3,150.00
1,951.60
825.60
4,670.77
21,132.07
454.55
32,184.59
11542 08/24/93 000126
11542 08/24/93 000126
1154Z 08/24/93 0001Z6
11542 08/24/93 000126
11542 08/24/93 000126
11542 08/24/93 000126
11543 08/24/93 000230
11543 08/24/93 000230
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
NUN] FINANCIAL SERVICES
NUN] FINANCIAL SERVICES
ANNUAL LANDSCAPE CONTRA
ANNUAL LANDSCAPE CONTIM
ANNUAL LANDSCAPE CONTIM
MONTHLY NAINT FOR JUNE
INCREASE AMOUNT OF OURR
JULY MAINT.
SERVICES FOR JULY 93
SERVICES FOR AUGUST 93
190-180-999-5250
191-180-999-5510
193-180-999-5510
190-180-999-5250
193-180-999-5510
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5370
190-180-999-5370
8,202.14
561.00
19,840.61
1,827.16
1,897.55
3,762.53
1,72~.35
1,552.38
36,090.99
3,275.73
115~, 08/24/93 000231 NBS/L(NRY
NAY SERV.
210-1~-627-5804
3,904.60
3,90~.60
11545 08/24/93 000238
1154~5 08/24/93 000238
11. 08/24/93 000239
11546 08/24/93 000239
11546 08/24/93 000239
11546 08/24/93 000239
FINAL TOUCH MARKETING
FINAL TOUCH MARKETING
OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERViC
OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC
OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC
OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC
500 COPIES OF VIDEO
NORFLEET VIDEO PRODUCTI
CHAVEZ ~E 062793
HP SEC/JR CHAVEZ HE 07/
TEMPORARY SERVICES
TEMPORARY SERVICES
280-199-999-5264
280-1~-999-52~
100-164-999-5118
001-163-999-5118
100-164-999-5118
100-164-999-5118
1,379.08
43.10
337.20
337.20
269.76
337.20
1,622.18
1,281.36
11547 08/24/93 000240 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING STRIPING SERVICES/JULY 100-16~-999-5410
1,906.80 1,906.80
11548 08/24/93 000251 PLANNING CENTER, THE
11549 08/24/93 000262 RANCHO HATER
DEVELOPMENT COOE PROCES 001-161-999-5248
HATER SEHER SERVICE 210-199-801-5804
8,029.61 8,029.61
6,986.00 6,986.00
11550 08/24/93 000271 ROBERT BEIN, ~ FROST & PH92-06 INSTALL TIMF SI 210-165-611-5804
11550 08/24/93 000271 ROBERT BEIN, UM FROST & SURVEYING SERVICES MAY 210-199-801-5804
11550 08/24/93 000271 ROBERT BEIN, k~q FROST & PROF SERVICES THRU 6/30 001-166-999-5423
1,070.00
8,767.00
5,300.00
15,137.00
11551 08/24/93 000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOC[ATI PLAN CHECKS FOR JUNE 93 001-162-999-5248
2,561.09 2,561.09
11552 08/24/93 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI JULY 93 METER USAGE 330-199-999-5239
1,187.00 1,187.00
11553 08/24/93 00038~ LAH/CRANDALL, INC.
11553 08/24/93 00038~ LAH/CIMNDALL, INC.
PROF SERVICES THRU 06/0 210-165-611-580~
PROF SERVICES THRU 07/0 210-165-611-580~
608.00
650.00 1,258.00
11554 08/24/93 000403 SHAHN SCOTT POOL & SPA POOL SERVICE & MAINTENA 190-180-999-5212
1,091.00 ' 1,091.00
11555 08/24/93 000482 LEIGHTON &ASSOCZATES PROF. SERV. JUNE 93 210-166-627-5804
5,810.50 5,810.50
11556 08/24/93 000523 E.N.W.D. SEMER/HASTE/HATER APPLI 210-199-801-5804
11 08/24/93 000538 R.J. NOBLE COMPANY ADJUST RETENTION 210-165-606-5804
4,195.00
13,967.19
4,195.00
VOUCHRE2
08/12/93
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
11557
11557
11557
11557
11558
11558
11559
11560
11560
11561
11561
11562
11563
11564
11564
16:0~
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE II!ER NAHE
~1~1~
~1~193
~1~193
~/~1~
08/24/~
08/24/93
08/24/93
08/24/93
08/24/9r3
08/24/93
08/24/93
08/24/93
08/24/93
08/24/93
08/24/93
000538 R.J. NOBLE COMPANY
000538 R.J, NOBLE CONPANY
000538 R.J. NOBLE CONPANY
000538 R.J. NOBLE CONPANY
000539 k/INNER YANADA ASSOCIATE
000539 k/IIetER YANADA ASSOCIATE
000689 CAHPBELL'S LIGHTING SIG
000820 UINCHAK, KRIS
000820 k/INCHAK, KItIS
000929 T,B. PENICK
000929 T.B. PENICK
001007 NELSON PAVING & SEALING
0010/,6 REXON, FREEDNAN, KLEPET
001069 HYDRO TEK SYSTENS
001069 HYDRO TEK SYSTENS
CITY OF TEHEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOB ALL PERIODS
ITEN
DESCRIPTION
RETENTION N)JUSTNENT
ADJUST RETENTION
ADJUST RETENTION
NARGARITA RD.
JUNE REZHB.
INV. NOT ACCEPTABLE
LIGHTING/ELECTRICAL
~ORKERS COMP FOR JULY 9
CFD 88-12 TRAFFIC SlGNA
PROF SERVICES JULY
RETENTION
REPAIR POTHOLES ON RAIN
ATTY CHARGES JULY 93
SAND BLASTER FOR STENCI
TAX
ACCOUNT
NUNBER
210-2035
210-165-606-5806
210-2035
210-165-606-580~
210-190-120-5802
210-190-120-5802
190-180-999-5212
001-1182
001-1280
250-190-129-5804
250-2035
100-164-~-5402
001-130-~-5246
100-164-~-5610
100-164-~-5610
I TEN
ANOUNT
13,967.19-
19,419.88
19,419.88-
9,995.33
1,283.64
6.20-
1,054 · 53
94.12-
1,250.00
395,918.00
39,592.00-
4,201.00
3,633.32
5,171.50
400.79
P~E~2
CHECK
AHOUNT
9,995.33
1,277.66
1,054.53
1,155.88
356,326.00
4,201.00
3,633.32
TOTAL CHECKS
509,537.24
ITEM NO.
4
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
August 24, 1993
Chamber of Commerce Agreement
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the FY 1993-94 agreement
with the Chamber of Commerce to provide services and authorize the Mayor and the
City Manager to execute the contract.
BACKGROUND: Attached you will find the annual activity report from the Chamber
of Commerce for your review. The current year budget includes $45,000 to fund the
Chamber of Commerce.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The amount is budgeted in account 280-199-999-5264.
Attachment:
Annual Activity Report
Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Agreement
SERVICES PROVIDED TO CITY
$103,100
(38.1~/,) CITY PROMOTION ....... . "-:'
--~;:'.~. ..... .... ~ (4.0%) SPECIAL EVENTS
(32~5~,4) INFORMATION
TOURISM
VISITORS GUIDE
ADVERTISING CAMPAKIN
SCHOOL PROGRAMS
WELCOME PACKAGES
MUSEUM I VISITORS CENTER
CITY PROMOTION
SHOP TEMECULA FIRST
FILM COUNCIL
BUSINESS SHOWCASE
INFORMATION
RELOCATION PACKAGES
DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
CALENDAR OF EVENTS
MAPS
RESIDENTIAL CIIJIDE
ASSISTANCE WALK- IN I PHONE'
BUSINESS PACKAGE
EDUCATION
SCHOLARSHIPS
SPECIAL EVENTS
BICENTENNIAL FLOAT
ARTS FESTIVAL
DOLLARS
10000
5000
700O
3800
5eeo
11)oo
11o8
TOTAL
DOLLARS
24500
4O0OO
1000
4108
PERCENT
23~63
38.797
32.493
0J79
3.977
SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE
TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
The Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce is a voluntary federation
of the business community uniting the efforts of business,
industry and professional individuals to ensure an enhanced,
healthy economic and socioeconomic base to benefit the entire
community. We work together to harness the tremendous potential
of the private enterprise system and thus, enabling its members
to accomplish collectively what no one could do individually.
TOURISM/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT:
The Tourism Committee consists of 20 Volunteers representing
Temecula's service, hospitality and tourist related industries.
, Visitor's Guide: A committee of more than 15 Volunteers have
completed a guide which highlights Temecula's tourist related
industries. A rack service will distribute 75,000 copies of the
guide to San Diego, Orange, and L.A. county areas for maximum
outreach to our target markets. Other distribution points
include the San Diego Concierge Association, Orange County Credit
Union, and other specific Resort locations.
* Ad CamDaian: A croup of 5 Volunteers established criteria and
reviewed proposals for a positive Ad Campaign on Temecula in
response to the Winter flooding. The Ad will run in the June and
July travel sections of the OC Register and LA Times.
, School Fieldtrip Proaram: The Tourism Committee is continuing
to work with Temecula Valley School District educators to
organize an historic tour for grade school children illustrating
how the Temecula Valley and its unique past figures into
California History. This program will ultimately be marketed to
major Southern California School Districts.
* Welcome Packages: A committee of'3 is assembling a package to
provide to special groups visiting Temecula. The packages will
include a welcome letter from the Chamber, coupons and specials
from local merchants, and giveaway items. The package is
designed to help visizors get around Temecula once there here and
to help them find services and merchandise they need.
* Museum: Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce has continued to
support the Temecula Museum by maintaining and staffing a
visitors center within the Museum to make community information
accessible to visitors of the Museum and Old Town. The Chamber
is also helping to distribute the new Temecula Museum brochure.
SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE
TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
CITY PROMOTION
The Chamber's Local Business Promotion is a committee comprised
of 7 individuals representing major Retailers, Developers and the
local Media.
, Shop Temecula First Ad Campaian: This Committee is working on
an ongoing,"Did You Know" Ad Campaign, to be run in all local
media. The Campaign will illustrate the wealth of resources
Temecula represents to provide goods and services to meet every
consumer need. The Campaign also highlights how the community
benefits by the regeneration of funds being directly invested
into City coffers from tax dollars spent in the City. The group
is also working on a City-wide business promotion through an
organized sidewalk sale in all the retail centers.
* Film Council: The Film Council is a non-profit corporation
working sell Temecula to the production and entertainment
industry as an ideal place to film or host their events. The
Chamber is supporting the Film Council by housing them within our
offices.
* Business Showcase: Over the last year the Chamber has
showcased over 400 local businesses to over 3,000 local people.
The showcase is designed to show people who's doing business in
Temecula and the resources which are available by local
merchants.
SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE
TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
INFORMATION
The Chamber provides 3 paid staff people and 3 Volunteers to
handle the organizing, updating, maintenance and dissemination of
information to Visitors, Businesses, and People interested in
relocating both families and businesses to Temecula. The Chamber
office will receive a projected 32,000 Calls, 7,000 Visitors, and
mail out over 3,.000 packages of information in 1993.
· Relocation Packaaes: This package includes information on the
history of Temecula, Schools, Utilities, City and Government
Offices, Law enforcement, Hospitals, and a basic community
profile.
* Demographic and Census Information: The Chamber assembles,
customizes, and distributes current information including census,
community growth figures, demographic studies, and an economic
profile from both Riverside County and the State of California
for new residents and businesses.
, Calendar of Events: Staff interacts with all groups and
organizations to keep a current calendar for the community and
the benefit of the organization to avoid duplication of events or
dates.
, Maps: The Chamber sponsors and maintains a current street map
and buyers guide which is available at our office.
* Pictorial: The Pictorial is a comprehensive guide to
Temecula. It provides a profile of business and industry,
medical and health services, lifestyle and real estate,
education, transportation, shopping, Old Town, Arts and culture,
recreation, and City and County Resources. It also serves as a
business directory for Chamber members.
, Residential Guides/Information: The staff maintains
information on residential developments, median home prices, and
rental information.
, Assistance/Walk-in/Phone: The Chamber staff will receive a
projected 32,000 Calls, interact with 7,000 visitors, and mail
out over 3,000 packages of information. These numbers represent
a first quarter measured increase of 10% over last years calls,
40% increase in Visitors and a 13% increase in mailings.
* Business Packaaes: The Chamber has customized Business Kits
available as a resource for new businesses. The kits include
information on who to contact in the City or County for, zoning,
licensing, sign ordinance, and City and County permits. Also,
phone numbers and addresses for utilities, Newspapers, County
Clerk, and tax reporting information.
SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE
TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
EDUCATION
, Scholarships: The Chamber's Governmental Affairs Committee
was able to raise $1,000 through City and business donations and
by recycling aluminum cans from monthly mixers and special events
to set aside for scholarships. The committee set a criteria for
students at local High Schools to achieve the scholarship,
including GPA, Civic involvement, and a Business Focus for the
future.
, Student-of-the-Month: This monthly luncheon recognizes 2
students from each of the three local High Schools, TTHS, Rancho
Vista, and Linfield who have demonstrated some type of
outstanding behavior. Students are recommended by a teacher and
selected by the Principal of the School. Awards have gone to
students who make it a point to befriend new students, have
turned in lost money, student government leaders, athletes, and'
those who have the honor of being the most improved student.
SPECIAL EVENTS
The Chamber is committed to insuring that Temecula maintain the
community spirit it has become known for. This comes from
promoting the people and the community from within.
, Bicentennial Float: The Chamber is proud to sponsor the
history and progress of Riverside County by helping its newest
incorporated City highlight its beauty and gain exposure by
entering a float in their Bicentennial Parade.
* Arts Festival: The Chamber not only promotes business but the
unity and cultural diversity that makes Temecula unique. This
year, the Chamber has taken a more active role in the Festival
through staff Co-Chairmanship of the event.
SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE
TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
The variety and scope of Chamber activities is unlimited,
depending on the needs of its members and the desire and ability
of the Chamber to carry them out. The Chamber represents and
promotes the area's economy, and encourages business and
industrial investment, broadening the tax base and providing
employment. To business prospects and newcomers, the Chamber
represents the community's "front door." The Temecula Chamber is
also involved in non-commercial areas, such as education, human
relations, environmental, cultural, and governmental concerns.
These challenges have caused the T.V.C.C. to become a viable
force in seeking solutions to today's issues. The united voice
of the Chamber often proves effective and beneficial to
businesses and the community where a single voice goes unheard.
Ambassadorship through staff involvement.
Rotary
Economic Development Corporation
Community Recreational Center
Arts Festival
Old Town Temecula Merchants Association
Temecula Boys and Girls Club
Scholarships/TVHS/LHS
Student-of-the-Month/TVHS/RVHS/LHS
Temecula Valley High School Grad-Night
KRTM
Temecula Valley Miss/Teen/Mrs. Pageant
Temecula Museum
Inland Empire Tourism Council
Temecula Valley Film Council
American Heart Association
All American City
Secretary's Day
Temecula Town Association
Temecula Valley Playhouse
Special Olympics
Promising Christmas
Jaycee's
Balloon and Wine Festival
Winter Rod Run
Southern California Chamber Coalition
California Chamber of Commerce and U.S. Chamber of Commerce
State Office of Tourism
Other Projects:
Temecula Valley Guide to Health and Human Services
Contributions of Governmental Periodicals to the Library
More Signage for Old Town and Wine Country
Marketing Program to continue the Temecula Ad Campaign
Bi-Annual Shop Temecula First Campaigns
Educational Internship Programs for High School Students
,,.TO
~I~D
~ <
SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE
TEMECULAVALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
MINIMUM MAN-HOUR CALCULATION
Meeting Man Volunteers
Frequency Hours Involved
Chamber Board of Directors:
Executive Officers
Full Board
Tourism Commkttee
Full Committee
Welcome Package
Ad Campaign
School Fieldtrip
Visitor's Guide
Mnthly
Hours
I/month 2hrs. x5mem 10hrs
1/month 2hrs xl5mem 30hrs
Local Business Promotion
Full Committee
Business Showcase
i/month 2hrs x20mem 40hrs
2/month lhrs x3mem 6hrs
2/month 2hrs x5mem 20hrs
1/month 2hrs x2mem 4hrs
Information
Office Volunteers
3/month 1.5hrs x7mem 31.5hr
I/month 1.5hrs x5mem 7.5hr
20/month 4hrs x3mem
240hrs
Governmental Affairs Committee
Full Committee 1/month
Education Sub-Com 1/month
Healthcare Sub-Com 2/month
1.5hrs xl5mem 23hrs
1 hr x4mem 4hrs
1.5hr x7mem 21hrs
4/month 2.5hr xlmem 10hr
Special Events
Arts Festival
TOTAL HOURS
447.0hrs
Volunteer time 447.0/hrs/mo.@$10/hr= $4,470.00 =
Staff Time Costs 325hrs/mo.@$10/hr= $3,255.00 =
Estimated Postage costs not including operations
Estimated Copy costs not including operations
Estimated Phone costs not including operations
TOTAL COST
ANNUALIZED
COST
$53,640/yr
$39,060/yr
$ 2,700/yr
$ 5,600/yr
$ 2,100/yr
$103,100/yr
TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
'10/92 through 4/93
The Chamber's Year End Statements, dated 9/30/92 reflects a
$52,810 net profit. However, the chamber received the $46,000
city contract renewal in August 1992 and closed their fiscal year
end in September 1992, which distorts the true bottom line for
the year end. Because the $46,000 was to be used for the
following year, below is an analysis of financial activity since
the funding:
BALANCE SHEET:
ANALYSIS
Liabilities:
Opening
10/92
$48,480.83
Current 7 Mos.
4/93
37,512.79
In October 1992, the beginning of the Chamber's fiscal year, the
liabilities of $48,480.83 are expressed as follows:
Accounts Payable-Other-$ 3,532': This is an outstanding
payable still due from the May 1991 concert, which is still
in dispute.
Loans from Officers-$ 8,000: Began in 1991 with a balance of
$16,000. Chamber set up a monthly repayment program to the
eight contributing Directors. Current balance is $4,180.29
and will be totally paid in full in October 1993.
Note Payable - Overland Bank $34,127. This loan was granted
in 1989, in the amount of $50,000. The loan was made to
cover expenses of two previous Balloon & Wine Festivals.
The Chamber makes monthly payments on this loan.
ASSETS:
Current assets are cash in bank: General operating fund and a.
money market savings account.
Fixed assets are office furniture & equipment and leasehold
improvements.
PROFIT & LOSS STATEMENT
INCOME
Membership renewals
New memberships
Computer income
Retail sales
Conference room rental
Interest income
Balloon & Wine Festival
Call America
Pictorial royalty
City Contract
TOTAL OPERATING
Marketing Committee
Membership Committee
Ways & Means Committee
TOTAL INCOME
4/30/93
page 2
Actual Budget Budget
7 mos. 7 mos. 12 mos.
76,407 79,600 93,075
9,725 14,000 24,000
1,790 1,050 1,800
1,876 700 1,200
800 350 600
127 125 300
-0- 5,000 5,000
2,339 3,500 6,000
4,775 3,000 3,000
-0- -0- 45,000
97,829 107,325 179,975
10,632 23,500 38,750
2,670 18,550 19,300
62,877 39,600 61,800
174,008 188,975 299,825
NOTES TO INCOME STATEMENT:
1. The Marketing Committee budgeted income of $38,750 consists
of publications revenue as follows:
Budgeted Received
1992 Map 5,000
Visitor Guide 3,000
Newsletter 30,750
3,000
-0-
year end will be 20,000
The Membership Committee budgeted to hold a Membership Drive
in April. The event actually occurred in May. Gross income
from the drive was $19,000.
The Ways & Means Committee is the fundraising committee and
since October has held 5 fundraisers and 6 mixers as follows
below. These are not "net" income figures, the expenses
connected to these events are reflected on the Expense
Statement on page 3.
Circus
Monte Carlo Nite
Business Showcase
Golf Tournament
Installation Dinner
Secretary's Day
Mixers
$4,539
5,174
20,349
9,966
11,772
3,816
7,261
TOTAL FUNDRAISING
62,877
Expenses
Net
(32,518)
30,359
PROFIT & LOSS STATEMENT page 3
EXPENSES (only dollar amounts over $100 ytd)
Actual Budget Budget
7 mos. 7 mos. 12 mos.
Bookkeeping 500 700 1,200
Business Kits 2,257 3,000 6,000
Donations 1,053 -0- -O-
Health/Dental 2,724 1,400 3,600
Insurance 3,354 5,350 9,500
Loan interest 1,985 3,150 5,400
Payroll 59,720 56,700 96,900
Payroll taxes 6,690 6,300 10,800
Phones 2,831 3,500 6,000
Phone equipment 821 1,575 2,700
Postage 2,531 3,400 5,400
Printing (relocations) 1,359 700 1,600
Rent 14,845 13,720 25,800
Repairs/maintenance 1,679 1,300 2,400
Supplies 2,435 3,800 4,800
Utilities 2,466 1,400 4,800
Workman comp 285 700 1,400
Other 5,089 3,960 9,000
Special events 1,100 2,000 5,000
TOTAL OPERATING EXP.
113,724 112,655 202,300
Membership Committee
Marketing Committee
Ways & Means Committee
Governmental Affairs
2,503 9,070 11,420
12,768 10,600 20,100
32,518 21,150 29,725
543 1,070 1,500
TOTAL EXPENSES
162,056 154,545 265,045
NET EXCESS
11,952 34,430 34,780
Projected net excess 12 mos. with City Contract
Projected net excess 12 mos. without Contract
12,000
(33,000)
,NOTE: Net excess does not include principal loan payments of
$1,300 per month.
NOTES TO EXPENSE STATEMENT:
1. Membership Committee expense is related to printing of
membership packages and expenses relating to the drive
2. Marketing Committee expenses include the following:
Shop Temecula First $10,000
Tourism 5,000
Newsletter printing 5,100
Page 4
3. Ways & Means expenses are related to producing the
fundraisers noted on page 2.
Governmental Affairs is the forums and Student of the
Month.
Special Events are $1,100 for Bi-Centenial sponsorship and
$2,000 for Arts Festival.
RUN DATE: 10/17/92
RUN TIME: 4:59 PM
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Balance Sheet
AS OF 09/30/92
PAGE
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS: 102 Cash in Bank - Chamber
103 Cash In Bank-Schshp Fund
109 Petty Cash
110 Money Market Savings
TOTAL - CURRENT ASSETS
FIXED ASSETS: 150 Office Furniture & Eqpmt.
152 Leasehold Improvements
155 Accumulated Depreciation
TOTAL - FIXED ASSETS
TOTAL ASSETS
20,604.62
850.00
107.15
4,603.41
39,855.68
20,164.00
37,625.00-
26,165.18
22,394.68
48.559.86
RUN DATE:
RUN TIME:
10/17/92
4:59 PM
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Balance Sheet
AS OF 09/30/92
PAGE 2
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES: 201 Accounts Payable-Chamber
203 Accounts Payable-Other
205 Payroll Taxes Payable
216 Sales Tax Payable
220 Loans From Officers
5,694.11
3,532.65
2,365.76
27.59
8,000.00
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
LONG TERM LIABILITIES:
241 Note Payable - Overland
34,824.46
TOTAL - LONG TERM LIAB.
TOTAL LIABILITIES
EQUITY:
28~---
28
Retained Earnings
Current Earnings
TOTAL EQUITY
TOTAL LIAB. & EQUITY
19,620.11
34,824.46
58,694.99-
52,810.28
54,444.57
5,884.71-
48,559.86
DATE: 10/17/92
TIME: 4:58 P~
CSAMBER OF COMMERCE
Income Statemen~
AS OF 09/30/92
PAGE
.............. THIS YEAR .............................. BUDGET ................
INCOME THIS MONTH RATIO i2 MONTHS RATIO THIS MONTH i2 MONTHS YTD VAR.
$* THIS MONTH THIS YEAR ** ** THIS MONTH'S BUDGET **
T~CONE:
OPERATING INCOME:
301 Membership lenewais 6,600.00 9.8 92,201.50 29.6 9.500.00 104,500.00 12.298.50-
302 New Memberships t.515.00 2.2 22,995.00 7.4 3.000.00 25,500.00 2,505.00-
303 Computer income 365.00 0.5 4,372.46 i.~ 250.00 4.000.00 372.46
304 Re~ai} Sales t42.99- 0.2- 3,554.82 l.l 200.00 2,400.00 {,{54.82
305 Conference Room Rental 0.00 0.0 85.00 0.0 50.00 600.00 515.00-
306 Interest Income i4.54 0.0 {18.Sd 0.0 20.00 240.00 {21.36-
387 City Contract 46,000.00 68.0 46,000.00 14.8 0.00 45,000,00 ~,O00.OG
308 Balloon and Wine 0.00 0.0 5.000.00 i.6 0.00 0.00 5.000.00
309 Contributions 0.00 0.0 625.06 0.2 0.00 0.00 625.06
3{C Rent 0.00 0.0 3.9~0.00 ~.2 0.00 2,880.00 1.080.00
TOTAL OPERATING INCOME
54,351.55 80.3 178,9[2.4~ 57.5
13,020.00 185,i20.00 6.207.52-
COMMITTEE INCOME:
325 Marketxn~ 4.759.25 7.0 31,94i.5:'! 10.3 4.000.00 46,000.00 {4,058.50-
327 Ways and Means 7,6{5.70 11.3 77,461.:3 24.9 8.550.00 88,600.00 i
328 Civic & Deveiooment 920.00 1.4 970.00 0.3 0.00 0.00 970.00
TOTAL COMMITTEE INCOM[ 13.300.95 19.? I32.2{7.0~ 42.5 12.550.00 144,600.00 12.382.92-
TOTAL INCOHE
67,652.50 I00.0 3t~.i29,56 {00.0
25,570.0~ 329,720.00 i8,590.44-
EXPENSES:
?PERATI}{G EXPENSES:
505 Bank Charges
Aiarm Servica
Bank Card Discount
Bookkeepin~
Business K;ts
Coffee/Water Service
Computer Maintenance
5;8 Donations
Dues & Subscriptions
522 FAY
529 Beaith &Denta{
53i Insurance - Property
532 insurance - Oen Liahii{ty
533 Insurance - Dir & Off
534 Interest
535 Janlturial Service
O.OO 0.0 18.0~ O.O 0.00 0.00 18.00
0.00 0.0 O.OO O.C 0.00 130.00 130.00-
0.00 O.O }44.53 0.~ 0.00 0.00 144.53
300.00 0.4 1.455.0~ 0.5 iO0.O0 1.700.00 245.00-
146.00 0.2 772.0~ 0.2 0.00 0.00 772.00
0.00 O.O 2~.1'; 0.0 0.0~ 200.00 170.90-
0.00 0.0 60.00 0.0 200.00 800.00 740.00-
O.OC 0.0 500.00 0.2 0.00 0.00 SO0.O0
370,00 0.5 i,090.OC 0.~ O.OC 350.00 740.0C
i54.9{ 0.2 441.00 0.! 50.00 800.00 359.00-
487.35 0.? 3.035.26 {.0 350.00 3,000.00 35.26
0.00 0.0 331.67 O.{ 0.00 0.00 33i.67 ,
427.00 0.6 2.997.19 1.~ 0.00 5,000.00 2,002.81-
i,693.00 2.5 i,693.00 0.5 0.0~ 1.500.00 {93,00
2,423.12 3.6 7.487.03 2.4 450.00 5,988.68 i,498.3r~
0.00 0.0 210.00 O.l 0.00 200.00 10.0
RU~; DATE: 10/]7/92 CBAMBE~ OF COMMERCE
RUN TIME: 4:58 PM
~ Income Statemen:
AS OF 09f30/92
PAGE 2
.............. THIS' YEAR .............................. BUDGET ................
INCOME THIS MOI:Tq RATIO 12 MONTHS RATIO THIS MONTH 12 MONTHS YTD VAN.
** THIS MONTH THIS YEAR ** ** THIS MONTH'S BUDGET.,
~38 Legal 1.{8;.68 1.7 2,581.6E 0.8 0.00 O.OO 2.581.~G
="" Loan Fees 0.0~ 0.0 i50.00 0.0 0.00 0.0~ 150.00
t38 Movxng Expense 2,977 5T 4.4 4 [[2.30 1.3 0.00 0.00 4.112.38
539 Meals 203.51 0.3 769.85 0.2 50.00' 650.00 119.8~
540 MxieaEe 200.25 0.3 808.79 0.3 50.00 650.00 i58.T9
541 Misc. Expense i50.00 0.2 i91.98 O.l O.O0 0.00 191.9~
542 Pagin~ Servioe 28.0G 0.0 2i1.52 0.[ 0.00 O.OC 2i1.52
515 Payroll 7,717.0~ il.4 S3.083.28 29.9 7,290.00 88.860.00 4,223.28
54e Payro]} Taxes 652.62 i.O 8,707.88 2.8 750.00 9,150.00 442.i2-
5Z? Personal Property Taxes 68!.62 1,0 66{.62 0.2 0.00 0.00 661.62
548 Phones-Vlsitor's Center 318.75 0.5 i,787.12 0.6 0.00 0.00 !.787.12
543 Phones 2.519.{~ 3.7 7.557.5~ 2.4 300.00 3.600.0C 3.957.54
=r~ -. . 3!4 3Z 0
~,, Phones Leased Enulnnr . .~ 225.00 2.700.00 45.36
52,~ Yos~aEe 1,273.4z 1.9 3.346.41 l.t 600.00 7,200.00 3,853.59-
557 Printin~-V~sitor's Center ~.OC! O.C 8~.77 O.O 0.00 0.00 68.77
558 Println~ 784.62 1.2 i,284.3~ ~.4 lO0.OG 1.600.00 3!5.70-
~ h~nt 0.0~ 0.0 21.543.T' 6.~ [.000.00 19.046.72 2.496.99
563 ""uairs & Maintenance 1.934.42 2.9 4.074.1~ 1.3 700.0c: 3.600.00 474.i6
5~' .2-Vlsitcr's Center 83 r: O I 359.6F 0.1 O.OO 0.00 359.68
r~ SC~ 74i.62 I I 4.269.30 I 4 150.00 ~ 800.00 469.30
5~: Seminars O.OO G.O 289.00 O.l 0.00 200.00 89.00
.~72 Supplxes-VIsl~or's Center 96.98 O.l i35.77 ~.O 0.00 0.00 135.77
573 Supplies 8~l,93 1.3 3.028.83 i.0 500.00 8.000.00 2.973.{7-
575 Storage 0.00 0.0 505.00 0.2 0.00 250.00 255.00
57P TaYes-Estlmated Payments 432.0~ 0.6 1.296.00 0.4 700.00 2,800.00 1.50~.00-
580 ior~man's Comnensation 0.0~ 0.0 I,i06.22 0.4 0.00 1,400.00 293.78-
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 29,I50.42 43.1 {84,938.43 59.4 13.565.00 {7i,175.40 13,763.03
COMMITTEE EXPENSES:
8,70 Membership 2,941.23 4.3 10,174.07 3.3 75.00 7,375.00 2.799.07
6:.q: Marketln~ 7,935.65 {1.7 28.{86.20 9.1 2.800.00 26.925.00 1.26{.20
602 Way & Means 5.231.3i 7.7 34,652.05 II.{ 2,550.00 30.550.00 4.102.05
~: Civic: ~ Deveiopment 50.03 C.l 368.52 C.i {O.OO 1,120.00 751'47-
TOTAL COMMITTEE EXPENSES {6.{58.Z8 23.9 73.380.85 23.6 5,435.00 65,970.00 7.410,85
TOTAL EXPENSES 45.308.7~ ET.C 258.3{9.28 83.C
19,000.00 237.145.40 21,173.88
REVENUE (EXPENSE)
22,343.80 33.0 52,8i0.28 i7.0
6,570.00 92,574,60 39,764.32-
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Balance Sheet
AS OF 04/30/93
PAGE
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
102
103
107
109
110
112
Cash in Bank - Chamber
Cash In Bank-Schshp Fund
Returned Checks
Petty Cash
Money Market Savings
Employee Advances
TOTAL - CURRENT ASSETS
FIXED ASSETS: 150 Office Furniture & Eqpmt.
152 Leasehold Improvements
155 Accumulated Depreciation
TOTAL - FIXED ASSETS
TOTAL ASSETS
3,487 10
961 05
340 O0
107 15
4,675 70
125 O0
40,094.82
20,164.00
37,625.00-
9,696.00
22,633.82
32,329.82
CHAMBE~ OF COMMERCE
Balance Sheet
AS OF 04/30/93
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
PAGE 2
CURRENT LIABILITIES: 205 Payroll Taxes Payable
216 Sales Tax Payable
220 Loans From Officers
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
2,814.05
25.99
4,180.29
LONG TERM LIABILITIES:
241 Note Payable - Overland
30,492.46
TOTAL - LONG TERM LIAB.
TOTAL LIABILITIES
EQUITY:
280
285
Retained Earnings
Current Earnings
TOTAL EQUITY
TOTAL LIAB. & EQUITY
7,020.33
30,492.46
2,377.06-
2,805.91-
37,512.79
5,182.97-
32,329.82
CHAMBER OF COMMERCF ?A3i ~
income Statement
AS OF 04130133
.............. THIS YEAR .............................. BUDGE7 ................
iNCOME THiS MONTH RITIO 7 MONTH~ RATIO THIS MONTH 7 MONTHS YTD VAR.
** THIS MONTH THIS YEAR ** ** THIS NONTH'S BUDGET **
~F~RATING INCOME:
~'~ Membership Renewals 6,345.00 23.6 54.8g7.2~ oP '~ ~$ ~s: 0~ ~4 ~2= 0~ 72.25
322 New Nemberships 1,540.0~ 5.? 9.725.00 6.4 2,000.00 14,000.00 4.275.00-
3q2 Computer income 335.00 t.2 1,789.75 1.2 150.00 {,05O.OO 739.75
3~ Retail Sales 3!2.64 1.2 1,876.i9 1.2 iO0.OC 700.00
~ Conferenc~ Room Rental SO.GO 0.2 80~.nfi ~.~ 50.CC ~ O0 ~50.OC
~ Interest Inco~ 20.36 ~.; {27 iG C.! 25.~ {75.~0 47.90-
30~ Ba}loon and Win~ [!.00 ~.~ C.O~ O.O D.C~! 5.000.~0 ~.000.00-
2~ Contributxons O.O~ 0.0 7?.53 0.1 O.Of' O.Or> ' 77.~3
3~: Ca}l America 26{.RS ?.C 2,33~.02 ,.5 500.OP 3,500.00 1.160.98-
3:2 Roya}ty income <.775.~5 {7.~ 4.775.(5 3.? O.Ofi 0.00 <.775.~5
TOTAL OPERATING INCOME
i3.6(?.31 50.~ 76,407.25
i5,150.0c 7S,6C~.Ur 3.{92.71-
COMMITTEE INCOME:
32f Narke~xn~ { ~"= O0 4 ~ 10,632 ~" 7.fi ~,25~.00 23,500.00 ;2,868.00-
32e MemOersnx~. 3gC.50 l.f 2,670.0i; ;.? 15.150.00 IE.550.00 15.880.00-
327 Ways and Means [1,637.00 43.~ 62,876.6~ 42.2 5,438.00 39,600.00 23.276.64'~
TOTAL COMMITTEE INCOHE 13,202.50 43.2 76,{78.64 49.9 24,850.00 81.650.00 5.47{.36-
TOTAL INCO~!
26.842.8~ lOO.C 152,585.93
40,000.00 161.250.00 8.664.07-
[YPENSES:
CFFRATI{:G E~PENSES:
5:? Bank Char~$
f': Bank Card Discou~~
f;': BeckKeeping
~' Bus!hess K~:s
f~f Compul~r MalnLenance
= ~ Donations
f'= Dues & SuDs:fictions
~Z FAil
~S; ~ea~tti & Dental
fRz insurance - Property
532 insurance - Gen Liab~lxty
.~ interest
E3;; Movxn~ Expense.
52~ Meals
540 Mileage
5~4 Payroll - Commxsslons
545 Payroll-Wages & Salaries
u.u. ~.Cf! 52.67
~:.C~ ~.!. 50ft.(:~= ft.3 lOG.C? 7OC.Ofi 200.00-
c n~ n ,, c~ ~C' ~ Z O.OC ~.00 256.50
,j!.C~? ~.: '~ Cj ~.; C.~:~ 30~.00 200.0%
~.Ofi 0.~ }.053.fi:, ~.7 0.6~: C.GO !.053.00
..... . ..... . ....u,~ 227."2-
i.i;2.9! ~.: ~ ""~ E~ ' ~ 200.~~ ~ 40~.0~ ;, ~ ....
0.0~ O.~ 0.00 O.C O.OC 5.000.00 5.000.00-
o'E.OC 0.8 ~.457.9: 1: =,OC~.OC E 350.00 3.892.0?-
32.24 n , {.S85.72 ' ~ 450.00 ~ ~50.00 'I,164.28-
0.00 0.0 851.~- 0.6- 0.00 O.GO 85~.85'
43.82 0.2 319.05 C.2 30.on 210.0~ 109.05
18.00 0.] 568.50 0.4 50.00 350.00 218.50
147.5c 0.5 1.378.50 O.S 200.00 1,400.00 23.50-
9,283.00 34.8 59,720.77 3S.I 8,100.00 5B,700.00 3,020.7'
intome Stat. e~ent
AS OF 04/30193
.............. ?-".,i>] ":EA,'-. .............................. -L2DGET ................
INCOME THIS ~ONT~ RATIC
546 Payro}] Taxes 1,008.09 3.F 6,690.4l 4.4 900.00 6,300.00 390.4~
5(7 Personal Property Taxes O.OO 0.~ 0.00 0.0 700.00 i,tO0.O0 1,400.00-
549 Teleuhone 558.66 "' 2,831.54 l.~ 500.00 3,50D.00 668.46-
55~ Phone Equipment - Leased 77.08 0.3 82G.21 0.5 225.00 i,575.00 754.79-
555 Postage 225.03 0.~ 2,531.44 =1.7 40G.OD 3.400.00 868.56-
558 Printing 31.00- 0.!- 1,358.94 0.9 105.00 ?O0.O~ 658.94
56C Rent 2,{32.50 7.~ 14,842.79 9.7 1,960.0f) 13.720.00 ~.122.7~
563 Repaxrs & Maintenance 919.!? 3.~ !,678.76 [.l 700.00 1,300.00 378.76
570 Seminars O.OO O.C 418.33 0.3 O.O0 400.0~ 18.33
~73 Supplies !.00 0.~ 2,434.94 {.6 400.00 2,800.00 365.06-
578 Taxes-Estimated Payments 0.0(! 0.~ G.GG 0.0 766.00 1,400.00
579 Uti!{t. ies 503.55 ;.9 2,466.G? 1.6 40(}.0C 2,800.0~ 333.93-
5~ Wor~ma~'s Compensation 0.0~ ~ ~' 284.95 C.2 O.~n 700.00 4i5.05-
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
2{,165.08 [i: I~ ~3 R,094.89-
COMMITTEE EXPENSES:
63/ rketing
602 ,ay & Means
603 Civic i Development
TOTAL COMMITTEE EXPENSES
i.037.5{! 3.~ 12.76E.2' ~.~
9,170.9~ 3~.2 32.517.9~ 21.3
172.22 0.6 542.52
lC,51g.g5 32.2 48,23i.73
¢,71(1.0G 9.870 ~' 6,5E7 n,-
3.OCC.OC lO,BO0.OO 2,168.27
3,980.GC 21,lSO.O~ ~1,367.B4
:iO.O;: 1,070.G~ 527.47-
14,2GO.O~: 41,890.00 6,441 ~c
EXPENSES
26,832.7< lOO.O i55.391.84 10i.8
~ 365.0~ i57,045.0G 1.853.{6-
REVENUE (EXPENSE:
10 n~ O.F' ? ~n5 .q'- ' ~-
4.635.00 4.205.00 7,010.91-
TEMECULA VALLEY CHANBER OF CONMERCE
B-UDGET
1993
2ceqory I)escr&ption Jan. Feb. Mar. Apt. May June au~y Aug,
~LOWS
~&w 0 0 0 0 5,000 0 0 0
8uax~e~e Kits 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
=all America 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500
=~-us T~x 0 0 0 1,500 0 0 0 0
=:cy Contract 0 0 0 0 0 0 45,000 O
coml~tet-Z 150 150 1S0 150 IS0 150 150 150
=onfetea~e Room 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
E=~ Bee~'Q~ Ins. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
aolZ Tmltll 0 0 12,000 0 0 0 0 0
InStillltiOn 6,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Zn~erest ln=ame 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
L~nc~eon 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0
~8~Ra, yilty 1,000 0 0 O 0 0 0 0
~arKltZZ~J O 0 O O O S,O00 0 O
~el~PNew 2,OO0 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
~es~-Reneeal 8.925 7,650 8,075 12,325 7,650 5,950 7,650 8,925
Memiet-~ltip CG~B 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
Membership Drve 0 O 0 o 15,000 o 0 0
Hlsc. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~xers 800 800 800 900 1,000 900 gO0 900
~once Carlo 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nevelettlr A~V 1,000 1.000 1,000 1,000 1.000 1,000 1,000 1.000
o=ner o o 0 o o 0 0 0
Pa0esnt 0 o o o 0 o o 15,0oo
P~ctcr Royalty 0 3,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
postage-1 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rmcycl~n~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Retail SeleE 10o lo0 1oo 1oo 1oo loo Zoo loo
secrete. Dey 0 o 0 4,500 o 0 0 0
Snovcase 0 0 0 0 0 11,250 0 0
Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. TOTAL
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
500 500 500 500
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
150 150 150 150
50 50 50 50
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 4.000
25 25 25 25
O 0 0 O
0 0 0 O
0 0 0 0
2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
8,075 6,800 5.100 5,950
150 1,150 1.150 650
0 O O 0
0 0 0 0
0 800 800 0
7,000 0 0 0
1,000 1,000 l,O00 1,000
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
zoo lo0 100 lO0
0 0 0 0
0 8,000 0 0
5,000
0
6,000
1,500
45,000
1,100
600
0
12,000
10,000
300
0
1,000
5,000
24,000
93,075
4,300
15,000
C
8,600
?,000
12,000
0
15,OOO
3,000
C
1,20c
4,50C
19,250
:TAL XNFIZ)WS
20,700 15,425 24,850 23,200 32,625 27,0?5 57,525 28,800 19,050 20,575 10,875 14,425 205,128
0
O
100
0
0
0
0
200
0
50
0
0
300
0
7,070
0
350
450
O
0
500
30
O
410
50
250
0
0
1,200
0
8,000
200
900
0
225
500
400
ZOO
2,150
100
25
0
0
0
0
0
400
?00
0
400
0
25,060
0 0 O 0 0 0 0
0 0 C 0 0 0 0
100 100 100 100 100 100 100
75 0 200 0 0 0 0
O 0 0 0 0 C 0
0 200 0 0 0 O 0
D 0 C 0 C O 0
0 O D 50 200 0 0
0 0 C 0 C C 0
50 50 50 50 50 50 50
0 5,775 ~ O G C 0
lOO 300 3C 30 3~ 30 30
3OO 300 300 300 300' 300 300
O 0 0 0 0 O 0
O 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 O 0 0 1,500 0
350 350 1,000 0 0 0 0
450 450 450 450 450 450 450
O 0 0 0 0 G 500
O 0 0 0 0 0 0
500 1,000 500 5,000 2,000 0 3,000
30 30 30 30 30 30 30
0 0 0 7,500 O 0 0
510 310 710 710 310 310 510
50 50 5C 50 50 50 50
250 250 250 250 250 250 250
0 O C 0 O O 0
0 0 0 0 O 0 0
1,200 ~.200 1.200 ~,200 1,200 1,200 1,200
0 0 G 1,500 O 0 0
8,000 8,000 8,100 8.100 8,100 8,100 8,100
200 200 200 200 200 200 200
900 900 gOD 900 900 900 900
0 0 C 0 C = 0
225 225 225 225 225 225 225
500 500 500 500 500 500 500
400 400 402 400 400 400 400
100 100 lOO 100 lOO 500 100
2,150 2,150 2,15Q 2,150 2,150 2,150 2.150
100 100 700 100 100 700 100
25 25 25 25 25 25 25
d 0 C O 0 0 0
0 0 3,23C 0 C 0 0
200 0 0 0 lO0 C 0
0 0 C 0 C C 0
O 0 C 0 2,325 C 0
400 400 400 400 400 400 400
0 0 0 700 O 700 0
0 2,000 2,000 1,000 5,000 500 5.000
400 400 40~ 400 400 400 400
0 0 0 0 0 700 0
17.565 25,765 24,200 32,420 25,895 20.670 24.9?0
-915 -1,000 205 1.180 36,155 3,830
-4,360 -2,140
O 0 0 0 C
O 0 0 0
100 100 100 100 1,200
0 0 0 0 27-t
0 0 0 0
300 0 0 ZOO
C 0 0 0 ;C
C 50 0 0
0 0 0 0 C
SO 50 50 50 60C
0 0 0 0 S,??.~
30 30 30 30 67C
300 300 300 300 3,60C
0 0 0 0 C
0 0 0 0 7,07C
O 0 0 0 1,SOt
0 0 0 0 2,05C
450 450 450 450 5,40(
O 0 0 0 50[
0 0 0 0 '
500 500 500 500 14,50'(
30 30 30 30 36t
,,_
0 0 0 0 7,50'
410 310 510 310 5,32
50 SO 50 SO 600 - --
250 - 250 250 250 3,000
5,000 0 0 0 5,000
0 0 0 0 0
1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 14,400
0 0 0 0 1,500
8,100 8,100 8,100 8,100 96,900
200 200 200 200 2,400
900 900 g00 900 lO,lO0
0 0 0 0 0
225 225 225 225 2,700
500 500 500 500 8,000
400 400 ?00 700 5,400
100 100 100 100 1,600
2,150 2,150 2,150 2,150 25,800
100 100 100 100 2,400
25 25 25 25 300
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 3,230
100 O 400 0 I00
0 0 0 0 0
0 2,325 0 0 4,650
400 400 400 400 4,100
700 0 0 0 2,100
500 500 500 500 17,500
400 400 400 400 4,100
0 0 0 ?00 1,400
23,470 19,645 1S.1'/0 ll,3?O 276,200
-4,420 530 -?,205 -3,045
II
_1
I--
0
I--
W
Z
m
U,
Z
U
0
Z
U
0
I m
:" .-.4
° i
I I I
OI CI OI 0
,"~1 ~
:1 I~
I . i
I I I
I ~'~1 I
I I
I I I
I I
I
I
I
I ; I
, I I
I I I
I I I
I I
~1 Cl "'~i I
""1 I I
I I I
I I I
I I I I
I I I
O
~ I,~D
I' 0',
I
I,
I,
r~
~ ~ i4,1
· 1.. ,~ U 0
0
I u'~
I'
I
'vI
I I
--I I
oI
OI OI 0
u~I
'0[ "'1 c~
I
I
0 0
~"1 b'l
~000 0 0
~ 0
0
,.~
O0I
I ~1
I
il
OI
OI
c~l
~,,~1
¢~1
I
OI
OI
OI
.,,DI
I
OI
r,.)
I
' I
I
I I
ii
IW
Id: IW
IQ-
I
101
I~-I.,
I
I
I
I
II
I I
I I ·
I~
I
I~
I
~I I I
I
0I
f~l
I
_ll,&l !-
m 0
I 0
,%.
0 0 0 OI 0
I I I I
I C:) I OI 0i C~
I I ~1 0 0
I I I ~
I I I
I I I I
I 0
I
I ~
I
I
I
0
I
I
0
!o
C~
~ I
I I I I
I
0
0
I
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OI
OI
~'1
I
I
I I
j '
· i wI w i'~
% ; 'JI.E
I I I I I I I ,
0
Ill
I I
000 ~ 0
-- ~- 0
~),- 0 ~J
2:0: ~ -,~ 0~
,~1~ ,~
~ I I I I
I I
ii
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I1~ I
I~l IIn
t--
mll-- ~
D) 0
u o
o Io
r-
| U
~.]
q=4
I
I
I I
I
OI
I I
o I
I
I
· -4 0 ~ ~
m mq-,
0 U
r.J w :3
'
,5',
,,-4
I., -, I
oI
ol o
o
--!
I
I I ' I I----.--
I I -' I.~1 I __ __
I I I
~I i'o J~ J
~J ~ I ~ I '"* I I I I
I I I
:!I
o I I i I
I~i , |
I I I I - I
I I I
I I I
!!
I
m o
..c
u
r.
'i
I ·
I ,-i
· =1,~ 79-1="
o
I o
I!
I,
o
P1 iI
I,
I,
I'
1'
!
I ol
iol
oI
I
I
I
ii
I
I I
I I
I
J
J
|
ILL.
I"'~
,u
i.
,r~J
J
O.
W
¢o
_1
Z
I
I
o
I
I,-
I
I I"'1
I I
!s'
I
I'-'l
I I
o
o ~
o
o
I o
I o
' Ii I
I I I I ! I I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
II
I I
I
I
I I
I I
!I
I I
I I
I I
I I
IW I
11,9 I!.wI
I( IW
IO. I~
I I{
I01 In
I~-l-
IJ
I~'
o
I-
o
,Iw e..- Z
I~1
o
0~ ,~.
o
,,~
c:
m
I I
Io Io
I,-,
I
I
I
I
I~ o
o~ c)
r
I
.d.]'
I
o Io
~ lu"~
I
I
I
I
o Io
--, Ion
I
I
I
t~
z
~,~
I I ! I I I
I I I I I
!iI11
I I I I I I I I I
o Io
-, lu'~
I
I
i
I o
I
I
II
!
I
|
II
I,
jl~ J
I I
I0 Ii.n
I&n If~l
I~1
I ~N
I I
I J ~ ~1~ J
I I I I II I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
...... I _ _1 _ _ o I
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGR~MBlqT
This Agreement, made in triplicate, this day
of , 1993, by and between the CITY OF TEMECULA, a
Municipal Corporation, duly organized and existing under and by
virtue of the laws of the State of California, (hereinafter
referred to as "CITY"), and the TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE, a California nonprofit corporation (hereinafter
referred to as "CHAMBER").
I. RECITALS
A. City is desirous of promoting its advantages as a
business, industrial, and residential center; disseminating
-information relative thereto, and of properly following up and
giving consideration to inquiries made relative to the various
activities of City and its possibilities as such to residential,
industrial, and business interests.
B. Chamber has special knowledge, experience and
facilities for disseminating information; and is organized for
and equipped to carry on promotional activities on behalf of
City; and to publicize and exploit its advantages.
C. Such activities are recognized by law as being in the
public interest and serving a public purpose.
I I. AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as
follows:
A. Chamber shall undertake, during the 1993-1994 fiscal
year, to carry on promotional activities on behalf of City and to
particularly render the following services:
1. To maintain suitable quarters and employ competent
professional personnel to carry on the promotional activities
herein stated.
2. To promptly answer all correspondence relative to
the business, industrial, and residential advantages and
opportunities in the City of Temecula, and to disseminate
information by correspondence, newspaper publicity and personal
contacts favorably advertising such advantages and opportunities.
3. To prepare information for articles and news
stories, assist in gathering news items, descriptive of City's
resources; and to develop proper data whereby outside interests
and individuals may be induced to locate in Temecula.
CITY OF TEKECUL~ AGREEHENT
4. To aid in property value preservation and the
development and use of unoccupied and vacant properties.
5. To interview business and industrial executives
with the view of urging the establishment of their business
activities in Temecula.
6. To promote and invite trade and business meetings
and celebrations whereby outside interests and individuals may
become acquainted with the advantages and opportunities in
Temecula.
7. To assist City in all ways possible in the
furtherance of the activities of the Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Temecula.
8. To maintain a public office within the business
area of City, easily accessible and fully equipped for the
purpose of disseminating information and answering correspondence
and inquiries regarding City. Said office shall be open to the
public not less than eight hours a day, except Saturdays,
Sundays, and holidays. Chamber shall employ a full time
Executive Director, a portion of whose duties shall be to promote
the welfare and activities of the City of Temecula; its
industries, business activities and opportunities, residential
advantages; and other matters of general public interest.
B. That in consideration of the services to be performed by
Chamber for City, as set forth in paragraph 1 hereof, City hereby
agrees to pay Chamber, during the term of this Agreement, the sum
of $45,000 for the fiscal year 1993-1994, payable on execution of
this Agreement.
C. In the event City should desire any additional service,
Chamber shall, upon request of City, furnish an itemized
statement of the estimated cost thereof, and City may modify or
alter any such plan or proposal in any particular area or may
reject said plan in its entirety, or may direct the submission of
a new plan or proposal which may be accepted, altered or
rejected. Upon the final approval of. any such plan and execution
thereof by Chamber, as herein provided, City will pay to Chamber
the cost thereof, which cost shall not exceed by more than
fifteen percent (15%) the estimated cost of such plan or proposal
unless with the express consent of City. All money due for
carrying out said plan or proposal shall be supported by a
detailed statement of Chamber showing the basis of said claims,
and certified by proper officers of Chamber. Chamber shall not
be entitled to receive any compensation for its services or usual
expenses.
D. The Executive Director shall prepare and submit to the
City Manager or his designee a semi-annual written report
specifying the activities of Chamber during the preceding
semester. Said report shall be prepared in format acceptable to
City.
CITY OF TEMECULA AGREEMENT Page 3
E. Chamber agrees that it will defend, indemnify and hold
City and its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees
free and harmless from all claims for damage to persons or
property by reason of Chamber's acts or omissions or those of
Chamber's employees, officers, agents or invitees in connection
with their services rendered hereunder to the maximum extent
allowed by law.
F. Chamber shall secure from a good and responsible company
or companies doing insurance business in the State of California,
pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of
this Agreement a policy of comprehensive automobile and workers'
compensation and employees' Liability Insurance in which the City
is the named insured or is named as an additional insured with
the Chamber and shall furnish a Certificate of Liability
Insurance to the City Manager before execution of this Agreement
by the City. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the
policy or any subsequent endorsement attached thereto, the
protection offered by the policy shall;
1. Include the City as the insured or named as an
additional insured covering the services to be performed under
this Agreement against all claims arising out of, or in
connection with, the Agreement.
2. Include the City, its officers, employees and
agents while acting within the scope of their duties under this
Agreement against all claims arising out of, or in connection
with, the Agreement.
3. Provide the following minimum limits:
General Liability: $1,000,000. combined
single limit per occurrence for bodily
injury, personal injury and property damage.
Automobile Liability: $I,000,000. combined
single limit per accident for bodily injury
and property damage.
Workers' Compensation and Employers
Liability: Workers' Compensation limits as
required by the Labor Code of the State of
California and Employers' Liability limits of
$1,000,000 per accident.
4. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of
subrogation against the Agency, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed
by the Contractor for the Agency.
5. Bear an endorsement or shall have attached a rider
whereby it is provided that, in the event of expiration or
proposed cancellation of such policy for any reason whatsoever,
the City shall be notified by registered mail, postage prepaid,
return receipt requested, not less than thirty (30) days before
CITY OF TEMECULA
page 4 --,,.
G. Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared t~ a
approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer sh
reduce or eliminate such deductible or self-insured retention as respec
the City, its officers, officials and employees; or the Chamber shall
procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation
claim administration and defense expenses.
H. Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto
concerning the provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party in suc
litigation shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, in addition
any other relief to which it may be entitled.
I. This Agreement shall be effective for the fiscal year
commencing July 1, 1993, and terminating June 30, 1994.
J. This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon thirty (
days written notice with any sums due and payable hereunder.
K. Chamber shall promptly furnish City, upon the completion of
Chamber's operating year, certified copies of annual operating statemen
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused its corporate name and sea
to be hereunto subscribed and affixed by the Mayor and attested. to by t
City Clerk, both thereunto duly authorized, and the Chamber has hereunt
subscribed this Contract the day, month and year hereinabove written--
CITY OF TEMECULA
ATTEST:
BY:
J. Sal Munoz
June S. Greek, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
ATTEST:
BY: ~-
Deane Manning, President
Leigh Engdahl, Executive Director
ITEM
5
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL:
/
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT .
City Council/City Manager
Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official
August 24, 1993
Service Authority for the Abatement of Abandoned Vehicles
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH A SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR
ABANDONED VEHICLE ABATEMENT
DISCUSSION:
In 1990, Assembly Bill 4114 was enacted into law. This Bill repealed and amended
California Vehicle Code (CVC) Sections 9250.7, 22665 and 22710 as they relate to
an Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program (AVA). A copy of AB 4114 is attached
identified as Exhibit No. 1.
Assembly Bill 4114 states that a service authority for the abatement of abandoned
vehicles may be established in any county if the Board of Supervisors in that county,
by two-thirds vote, and a majority of the cities having a majority of the incorporated
population within the county have adopted resolutions providing for the establishment
of the Authority. The membership of the Authority shall be determined by
concurrence of the Board of Supervisors and a majority vote of the cities within the
county having a majority of the incorporated population. The authority shall be
staffed by existing county and city personnel.
The Assembly Bill further states that a service authority may impose a service fee-of
one-dollar per vehicle registered to an owner with an address in the county which has
established SERVICE AUTHORITY. The fee shall be paid to the Department of Motor
Vehicles at the time of registration, or renewal of registration, or when renewal
CCCMVehicleAbt.7 13
becomes delinquent on or after January 1, 1994, except for vehicles expressly
exempted from payment of registration fees. it is important to note that regardless
of the City participating in the AVA program or not, if a Service Authority is
established, citizens of the City will be assessed the additional one (1) dollar per
vehicle registered, with the funds being set aside in the City's name with the Service
Authority. This legislation is effective for a five (5) year period and will be evaluated
at that time for its effectiveness. City Ordinance No. 90-24 pertaining to Nuisance
Abatement provides for the abatement of abandoned vehicles with cost recovery by
means of a recorded lien against the property. The Service Authority Agreement
provides for direct quarterly reimbursement of abandoned vehicle abatement costs.
To date, twenty-two (22) incorporated cities within the County have filed interest in
the AVA program.
On June 22, 1993, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved Resolution
93-260 (Exhibit No. 2 attached) and an accompanying agreement for creating a
County/City joint AVA Service Authority. Upon receipt of an adopted City Resolution
and a signed Service Authority Resolution from all interested cities, the Riverside
County Board of Supervisors approved the AVA package on July 20, 1993. The
approved AVA package was then forwarded to the Department of the California
Highway Patrol for acceptance.
The County received Resolutions from seventeen (17) incorporated cities approving
participation in this program. Should the City Council wish to participate in this
program, applications must be received by the County no later than September 10,.
1993, for the City to be eligible for participation during Fiscal Year '93-'94. Receipt
of the City's application after September 10, 1993, could result in the City's
participation being delayed until Fiscal Year '94-'95.
FISCAL IMPACT:
It is estimated that the City of Temecula will be eligible to recover abandoned vehicle
abatement costs up to a maximum of $21,459 pet year during the period this
legislation is in effect, or until all respective appropriated funds are depleted.
V:~WP~CCCMABATE,VEHICLE
RESOLUTION NO. 93-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY. OF TEMECULA, CALIFO~,
REQUESTING T~F~ ESTABLISHMENT OF A
SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR ABANDONED
VEHICLE ABA~ AND IMPOSITION
OFA FEE
WHEREAS, Section 22710 of the California Vehicle Code was amended in 1990
to provide for the establishment of a Service Authority for Abandoned Vehicle Abatement
(AVA) if the Board of Supervison of the county and a majority of the cities within the county
having a majority of the population adopt resolutions providing for the establishment of the
authority; and,
WHEREAS, Section 22710 and 9250.7 of the California Vehicle Code pwvide
for the imposition of a one-dollar ($1.00) fee by the Service Authority on vehicles registered to
an owner with an address in the County which established the Service Authority; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula finds that abandoned,
inoperable, wrecked, dismantled vehicles or parts thereof pose a health and safety hazard and
are found to be public nuisances; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecuh adopted Ordinance 90-24
which provides for abatement and removal as public nuisances of abandoned, wrecked,
disintegrated or inoperative vehicles from private or public pwperty; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula finds that an abandoned
vehicle abatement program is needed to provide for the pwper removal and disposal of
abandoned vehicles and assist law enforcement and code enforcement personnel in abatement of
abandoned vehicles; and,
WHEREAS, the Riverside County AVA Service Authority will have
responsibility for implementing an abandoned vehicle removal program in Riverside County
region;
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND Ol~,I)ER~-r~, that the City
Council of the City of Temecula hereby requests that a Service Authority for Abandoned
Vehicles be established in the City of Temecula pursuant to the provisions of Section 22710 of
the California Vehicle Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecuh
directs that the County of Riverside shall serve as the Service Authority for Abandoned Vehicles
in the City of Temecula.
~ 5/r~sos/abat I
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecuh
approves the vehicle abatement program and plan of the AVA Service Authority of the County
of Riverside and a one dollar ($1) vehicle registration fee be imposed. The fee imposed by the
Service Authority shall remain in effect only for a period of five years.
PASSED AND ADOFrED by the City Council of the City of Temecula, State
of California, on this day of , 1993, by the foilowing vote:
ATrST:
J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
51te~o~l,.b~t 2 "'~"
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 93~ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the_ day of__, 1993, by the following vote:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCII.,Mm~MBERS:
ABSENT: -
CO~CILMEMBE1~:
Assembly Bill No. 4114 '
~ IGEi4
An act to ~mend Section 22665 of, and to repeal g. nd add Sections
g2r~.7 and 22710 of, the Vehicle Code, reliting to vehicles, and mak-
ing an appropriation therefor.
t-r-GlrbATIVE COUN$1~.~ DICE;ST
AB 4114, C!ute. Motor vehicles: abnndom-nent.
'Existing law imposed a $1 vehicle registration fee for deposit in the
Abandoned Vehicle Trust Fund which is continuously appropriated
for cosLs 'o[ the Controller, Department oAr the C_~lifornia Flighway
Pafi, ol, and specified local abandoned vehicle nuisance abatement
progrurns.
This bill would delete those provisiotxs nnd would provide for the
establishment and terminntion olr service authoritie~ for the
abateanent of abandoned vehicles gad funding or loc~ abandoned
vehicle abatement progr-dms, nz specified. The bill would authorize
a service au'thority, for a speeLried period, to impose a fee of :~1 on
vehicles registered in the county which established the service
authority. Those lees would be depositeel in the Abandoned Vehicle
Trust Fund which this bill would create and would be continuously
appropriated for allocation by the Controller to fund local vehicle
abatement progrants after deduction of certain administrative cosl~.
Appropriatiotz: yes. ,
TAe people of tAe Slate o£ Cqlifornia do enact as fo/lot~:
SECI'ION i. The Legislature finds and declares that the problem
'of abandoned vehicles is continuing to grow and recognizes that local
government3 have insufficient resources to adequately addran the
problem. The Legislature further finds that the increase in
abandoned vehicles is not only a public ztuisance, but a daxtgqz' to the
public's health and safety. Therefore, in order to eastire the
abatement oE abandoned vehicles, the Legislature finds it necessary
to provide for the establishment oF local service auH~orities for the
purpose oE nbnting abandoned vehicles.
SF-C. 2. Section 9'2.50.7 of the Vehicle Code is repealed.
SF-C. 3. Section 9250.7 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:
9250.7. (a) A service authority established under Section 22710
may impose a service fee of one dollar ($1) on vehicles registered to
an owner witIt an address in the comtty which established the service
authority. The fee shall be paid to the department at the time of
regisin'at. ion, or renewal oF registration, or when renewal becomes
Ch. 1684 -- 2 --
delinquent, on or alter January 1, 1992, excep~ vehicles that are
· expressly exempted under this code irrom the payment o~
regisn-ation
(b) The department, alter deducting its administrative cosn, shall
transmit, at least quarterly, the net amount collected pursuant to
subdivision (a) to the Treasurer [or deposit in the Abandoned
Vehicle Trust Fund which is hereby created. All money in the irund
is continuously appropriated to the Controller iror allocation to a
service 'authority which has an approved abandoned vehicle
abatement program pursuant to Section' 2Z710, and ~or payment of
the administrative costs olr the Controller. Alter deduction of its
administrative c~ts, the Controller shall allocate the money in the
Abandoned Vehicle Trust Fund to each service authority in
proportion to the revenues received lrrom the fee imposed by that
authority pursuant to subdivision (a) .
(c) The fee imposed by a service authority shall remain in efirect
only [or a period oi: five years miter the date on which the authority
is established.
' 'SEC. 4. Section ~.6Cx5 oir the Vehicle Code is amended to read:
Zo..6~. Nonvithstanding Section ~s'/10 or any other provision o[
law, the departme~xr may, at the request oir a local authority, other
than a service auehority, administer on beluif of the authority in
abandoned vehicle abatement and removal program established
pursuant to Section ~.~0.
SIEC. 5. Section ~710 of the Vehicle Code is repealed.
SlEC. 6. Seceion 2,~710 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:
2'2~10. (a) A service authority lot the abatement of-~bandoned
vehicles may be established, and a one dollar (31) vehicle
registration fee imposed, in any counp/iir the board oir supervisors of
the counp/, by a two-thirds vote, and a majority of the cities having
a majori~ of the incorporated population within ~'xe county have
adopted resolutions providing iror the establishment o[ the authority
and imposition of the lee. The membership of the authority shall be
determined b.~ concurrence oir the boo. rd of supervisors and a
-majority vote of the majori~ of the cities within the counp/having
' a majority o[ the incorporated population.
(b) The-authority may contract and may undertake any act
convenient or necessary to carry out any law reln~ag to the
authority. The authority shall be stalled b), ex~st:mg county and city
personnel.
(c) (1) Not'withstanding any other provision oir law, a service
authority may adopt an ordinance establishing procedures for the
aba~ement, removal, and dixposal as public nuisances, o[ abandoned,
wrecked, dismantled, or inoperaPive vehicles or par~s thereo[ from
private or public t~roperty; and lot the recovery, pursuant to Section
25845 or ~5773.5 oi~ the Government Code, or assumption by the
service authority/, of costs of administration and that removal and
disposal. The actual removal and disposal o[ vehicles shaft be
--~-- Ch. 1684
undertaken by zn en~ity which may be a county or city or the
dep~runent, pursuznt to contract with the service authority ~s
provided in this section.
(9.) The money received by s.n authority pursuant to Section
9250.7 s. nd this section shs/l be used only for the sbatement,.removs~,
snd dispos~ ss public nuissnces of any absndoned, wrecked,
disrnnntled, or inoperative vehicles or ps.rts thereof from private or
public proper~t.
(d) (1) An abnndoned vehicle abatement progrs~x s.nd plsn of a
service authority shall be implemented only with the approval of the
county ~.nd a m~jority of the cities hayinK a rn~jority of the
incorponted popuhtion.
(9.) The deparUnent shall provide guideUnes for abandoned
vehicle abatement pro~-arns. An authority's ab,,ndoned vehicle
abatement plan ~.nd progum shall J:~ conintent with those
gu/delines, and shall provide for, but not be limited to, an estimate
oi: the number of abandoned vehicles, a dispos~.l znd erncorcement
strategy~induding contractual agreements, znd appropriate fiscal
contrcris.
(3) The approved plzn sh,~l be submitted to the dep~rtment by
Au~'t 1, 1991. The department sl'~!l review the plan ~'xd mzke
recomrnendatiom for rev~ion, i~ zny, of the plzn by October 1, 1991.
The service authority shall submit the pl~'~, ~s revised, to the
department and, ~ determined by the dep~rtment to be conintent
with the guidelines, shzll submit the plzn to the Controller by the
Following January 1. ExcEpt u provided in subdiv~ion (e), the
Controller shall make no ~.llocations l:or a czlenctar year to a service
authority for which zn approved plzn wzs not received on or before
J~nuary 1 of that year.
(e) Any approved plan which w~s adopted by the authority
pursuznt to subdivision (d) may be revised purmant to the
procedure prescribed in subdivision (d) , including compliznce wi~h
zny dates described therein for subm/~ion to the department and
the Controller, respectively, in the year in which the revisions are
proposed. Compliance with that procedure shall only be required/f
the revisions zre substantial. A servicc authority which is new~
formed and ha~-not complied with subdivision (d) may so comply
~ter the dates spec/~ed in subdivision (d) by submitting zn
approved ptan on or before those da~es in the year in which the plan
is submitted.
(F) A ser-vic~ ~uthor'ity shall cease to exist on the date that all
revenues received by the authority pursuant to this section znd
Section 9~0.7 have been expended.
SEC. 7. The Dep~runent o~ the California Highway Patrol shall
report to the LeS'~lature by J~nu~ry 1, 1996, on the effectivene~ of
~he abandoned vehicle abatement programs conducted pursuant to
Sections 9'2..50.7 and P..rZl0 of the Vehicle Code. Upon request of the
Deparment of the C.~L~orr~ Highway Patrol, a service authori~
Ch. lS84
created pursuant to .Seetic;n ~'710 shall submit: data relative to the
operation ot' its abandoned vehicle abat~me, nt program. to the
department.
1 Board of Supervisors
4
5
6
7
County of Riverside
RESOLUTION NO. 93-260
PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY ABANDONED VEHICLE ABATEMENT SERVICE
AUTHORITY AND AUTHORIZING IMPOSITION OF
VEHICLE REGISTRATION FEE
WHEREAS, Vehicle Code Section 22710, subdivision (a), provides
8 for the establishment of a service authority for the abatement of
9 abandoned vehicles and the imposition of a one dollar ($1.00)
10 vehicle registration fee in any county where the Board of
11 Supervisors of the county by a two-thirds vote, and a majority of
12 the cities having a majority of the incorporated population within
13 the county, have adopted resolutions providing for the establishment
14 of the authority and imposition of the fee; and
15 WHEREAS, the proliferation of abandoned vehicles remains a
16 continuing public nuisance within the unincorporated areas of
!? Riverside County; and
18 WHEREAS, the attached Agreement for R~verside CountS-
19 Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority establishes a service
20 authority for the abatement of abandoned vehicles in Riverside
21 County pursuant to Vehicle Code Section 22710 and Government Code
22 Section 6500. In accordance with Vehicle Code Section 9250.7, the
23 Agreement requires the imposition of a service fee of one
24 ($1.00) on vehicles registered to an owner with an address in the
25 county; now, therefore,
26 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of
27 Riverside, State of California, in regular session assembled on June
28 22, 1993, that this board hereby authorizes its Chairman to execut{
EXSIBIT 2 1 J~ 2 2 |~3 e~.
the a~ached Agreemen~ For Riverside Counzy Abandoned vehicle
Aba=emen= Service Aunhori=y on behalf of =he Coun=y of Riveting.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
!1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2 4 F: \JFITZCOO\FJA~RZS\ 93-260
6/15/93
28
Roll Call:
Ayes: Buster, Dunlap, Ceniceros, Younglove
Noes: None
Absent: Larson
2
1
4
5
AGREEMENT FOR RIVERSIDE COUNTY ABANDONED
VEHICLE ABATEMENT SERVICE AUTHORITY
Section 1. PARTIES. Th~ parties to this Agreement are the
County of Riverside and those cities within the County that have
elected to create and participate in the Riverside County Abandoned
vehicle Abatement Service Authority as provided herein.
Section 2.
PURPOS~ AND AUTHORITY. The purpose of this
Agreement is to establish a service authority for the abatement of
abandoned vehicles in Riverside County pursuant to Vehicle Code
Section 22710 and Government Code Section'6500, et seq.
8 Section 3. CP~ATION. Upon the effective date of this
Agreement, there is hereby created the Riverside County Abandoned
9 vehicle Abatement Service Authority ("Authority") as a separate
public entity and distinct from the member jurisdictions to
10 implement this Agreement in accordance with Vehicle Code Section
22710.
1!
Section 4. BO~D OF DIP~CTORS. The Authority shall be
12 governed by the Board of Directors, to be appointed as follows: one
(1) representative from each jurisdiction in the County electing to
13 become a member of the Authority.
14 Section 5.
POW~.RS ~ND DUTIES.
15
16
17
18
A. Contracts and Acts. Pursuant to Vehicle
Code Section 22710(b), the Authority may contract and may
undertake any act convenient or necessary to carry out any .
law relating to the Authority, including acts necessary tc
ensure that the vehicle registration fee authorized by
Vehicle Code Section 9250.7 is used in accordance with the
requirements of Vehicle Code Section 22710.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
B. Ordinance. Pursuant to Vehicle Code
Section 22710(c)(1), the Authority shall adopt ar
ordinance establishing procedures for the abatement,
removal, and disposal, as public nuisances, of abandoned,
wrecked, dismantled, or inoperative vehicles or parts
thereof, from .private or public property; and for the
recovery, pursuant to Section 25845 or 38773.5 of the
Government Code, or assumption by the Service Authority,
of costs of administration and of that removal ant
disposal. The actual removal and disposal of vehicle~
shall be undertaken by either the County, a city, or the
Department of the California Highway Patrol ("CHP"),
pursuant to the contract with the Authority.
26
27
" 28
WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN
COu~N'r',,' CO',.;NSEL
SUITE 300
3535 10TH STREET,
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA
C. Proaram and P3an. Pursuant to Vehicle Code
Section 22710(d), the authority shall implement az
abandoned vehicle abatement program and plan followin~
approval of the program and plan y the County of Riverside
and a majority of the cities having a majority of the
1
2
incorporated population and Participating as members cf
the Authority. The program and plan shall be consi- ~nz
with guidelines prepared by the CHP. --~
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
D. Fee. Pursuant to Vehicle Code Section
9250.7, the Authority shall impose a service fee of one
dollar ($1.00) on vehicles registered to an owner with an
address in the County, including the incorporated cities.
E. Restriction. The manner of exercisinc
powers granted by the Authority by this Agreement shall b&
subject to the same restrictions as are imposed upon the
County of Riverside and participating member agencies in
their exercise of similar powers.
Section 6. ST~rF. Pursuant to Vehicle Code Section
22710(c), the Authority shall be staffed by each member agency.
Section 7. AUDIT. There shall be strict accountability of
all Authority funds. The County Auditor shall be the auditor for
the Authority. The Auditor shall report all receipts and an annual
audit of the Authority pursuant to the requirements of Government
Code Section 6505. The Authority shall compensate the County
Auditor for reasonable charges incurred in the performance of said
audit.
14 Section 8. FUNDS. The funds received by the Authority from
the one dollar ($1.00) registration fee shall be used in accord ce
15 with Vehicle Code Section 22710(c)(2), and shall be distribut~;c
the cities and the County for their use in accordance with Ve, .... ;le
16Code Section 22710(c)(2).
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WILLIAM C. KATZFNSTEIN
COUNTY COUNSF,.L
SurrE 300
3535 · IOTH STREET
RIVERSIDiL CALIFORNIA
Section 9. DEBTS AND LI~RILITIES. The debts, liabilities
and obligations of the Authority shall not be the debts,
liabilities, and obligations of the member jurisdictions, or any of
them.
Section 10.. AM~.NDM~NT. This Agreement may be amended upor
the approval of a majority of the member agencies having a majorit1
of the population. For purposes of this section, the population or
the County is defined as all of the population residing within the
unincorporated areas of the County of Riverside.
Section 11. T~RMINATION BY MEMBERS.
Section 22710, this Agreement may be
jurisdictions as follows:
Subject to Vehicle Code
terminated by membe:
A. Individual Member Jur.~sdictions. A membe:
jurisdiction may terminate its participation in =hi/
Agreement and the Authority effective on the first day
any fiscal year provided that such jurisdiction shall giv~
one year's prior written notice of such termination to
Authority and the other member jurisdictions. The Notic~
of Termination may be rescinded upon written notice to ~h-
Authority and the other member jurisdictions at any~l-
1
2
before the effective date of termination.
B. Maioritv. This Agreement may be terminated
at any time by a majority of the member jurisdictions
voting to dissolve Authority.
4 Section 12. T~RMINATION. The Authority shall cease to exisz
on the date that all revenue received by the Authority pursuant
5 Vehicle Code Section 9250.7 has been expended.
6 Section 13. [FFMCTIVE DAT~. This Agreement becomes
effective upon approval of the County Board of Supervisors by two-
7 thirds vote, and a majority of the cities having a majority of the
incorporated population within the County.
8
9 Dated: JUN l~1~'93
!0
ATTEST:
11
GERALD A. MALONEY
12 Clerk of the Board
14
15
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Chairman, Board of Supe'r~i'S'd'f~'
16
!7
Dated:
CITY OF
18 ATTEST:
By
19
20
By
Deputy
Title
21
22
23
Dated:
CITY OF
24 ATTEST:
By
25
26
By
Deputy
Title
27
WILLIAN (i KATZENSTEIN
COUNTY COUNSEL
SUITE 300
3535 · ~0TH ~'TRETT
1
4 By
5
?
8
9
10 By
11
15
14
15
16 By
17
18
!9 Dated:
21
22 By
Z4
26
28
WeLLIAM C. KATZENS'TEIN
COUNTY COUNSEL
SUITE 300
3535. IOTH STREET
RIVERSIDE. CALIFC)f~IIA
Dated:
ATTEST:
Deputy
Dated:
ATTEST:
Deputy
Dated:
ATTEST:
Deputy
ATTEST:
Deputy
~ITZC~PJA~\93-2e0
6/15/93
CITY OF
By
Title
CITY OF
By
Title
CITY OF
By
Title
CITY OF
By
Title
ITEM NO. 6
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL:
City Council/City Manager
Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official
August 24, 1993
Approval of Contract Award for Plan Review Services
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the award of contract to ESGIL
Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, as the
primary plan review firm to provide complete plan review services to the Building and
Safety Department. It is further recommended that the City Council approve the
retention of VanDorpe/Chou and Associates, Inc., 295 North Rampart Street, Orange,
CA 92668, and Melad and Associates, 8907 Warner Avenue, Suite 1 61, Huntington
Beach, CA 92647, to support the plan review needs of the City's Building and Safety
Department.
DISCUSSION:
On October 8, 1991, the Building and Safety Department advertised a Request For
Proposal for outside consultant firms to perform complete plan review services. The
City Clerk's office received responses from twelve (12) firms. The firms judged to be
the six (6) most qualified, which included one (1) Temecula based firm, were then
invited to personal interviews. As a result of the personal interview process, five (5)
firms were chosen to provide plan review services for a one (1) year period. Upon
expiration of the first year's contract agreement, the three (3) firms that provided the
highest level of service to the City were retained and are currently performing the
City's building plan review. Prior to expiration of this current fiscal period, it is
Building and Safety's intent to enter into the RFP process once again.
The ESGIL Corporation has provided complete plan review services to the Building.and
Safety Department for a twelve (12) month period beginning July, 1992. Staff has
found the turnaround times, accuracy and customer relations of the ESGIL Corporation
to be timely and of the highest quality. Staff has also had the opportunity to work
V:~AgendaRpt%CCCMPLCH.RV1N
Agenda Report
July 27, 1993
Page 2
with VanDorpe/Chou and Associates, Inc., and Melad and Associates during this
period and found their responsiveness to the Department's plan review needs to be
an asset.
Staff is recommending the ESGIL Corporation be the primary plan review firm to the
Building and Safety Department with VanDorpe/Chou and Associates, Inc., and Melad
and Associates further supporting the plan review needs of the Building and Safety
Department on an as-needed basis. Compensation for plan review services will remain
as previously agreed at the following rates:
1. Esgil Corporation
69% of plan check fees collected by
City
2. Vandorpe Chou Associates, Inc.
65% of plan check fee collected by
City
3. Melad and Associates
70% of plan check fee collected by
City
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funding for plan review services has been approved for Fiscal Year '93-'94 in the
amount of $75,000 in Account No. 001-999-162-42-5248 "Consulting Services."
No additional funds are being requested.
V:%AOendaFipt%CCCMPLCH.RVW
AGREEMENT
FOR CONTRACT SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 24th day of August, 1993,
between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as
"City" and Esgil Cornoration. hereinaftar referred to as "Contractor."
The parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
i. SERVICES: Contractor shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit A
attached hereto. Contractor shall complete the tasks according to the
schedule set forth in Exhibit A.
2. PERFORMANCE: Contractor shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and
to the best of his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks
described herein.
3. PAYMENT: The City agrees to pay Contractor as set forth in .Exhibit B.
Contractor will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices
shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty' {30) days of
receipt of each invoice.
SUSPENSION. TERMINATION OR ABANDONMENT OF AGREEMENT:
The City may, at any time, suspend, terminate or abandon this
Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at
least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the
Contractor shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless
the notice provides otherwise. Within thirty-five (35) days after receiving
an invoice from the Contractor, the City shall pay Contractor for work
done through the date that work is to be ceased pursuant to this section.
If the City suspends, terminates or abandons a. portion of this Agreement
such suspension, termination or abandonment shall make void or
invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
BREACH OF CONTRACT: In the event that Contractor is in default for
cause under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no
obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work
performed after the date of default. Default shall include not performing
the tasks described herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City
Manager of the City Failure by the Contractor to make progress in the
performance work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes beyond
his control, and without fault or negligence of the Contractor, shall not
be considered a default.
If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor defaults in
the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the
Contractor with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall have ten (10) days
after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a
satisfactory performance. In the event that the Contractor fails to cure its default
within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other
provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and
without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or
under this Agreement.
6. TERM: This Agreement shall commence on August 24, 1993. and shall
remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed,
but in no event later than June 30. 1994.
Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute
between the City and the Contractor arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof,
shall be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final.
Contractor shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three
retired judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration
hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure, Section
1280, et se¢l. City and Contractor shall share the cost of the arbitration equally.
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS: Upon satisfactory completion of, or in
the event of termination, suspension of abandonment of this Agreement,
all original documents, designs, drawings and notes prepared in the
course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this
Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used,
reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of
the Contractor.
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR: The Contractor is and shall at all times
remain as to the City a wholly independent Contractor. It is expressly
understood and agreed that Contractor shall in no event as a result of
this contract be entitled to any benefits to which City employees are
entitled, including, but not limited to, overtime, any retirement benefits,
worker's compensation benefits, and injury leave or other leave benefits,
and for such purposes shall be deemed an independent Contractor.
LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Contractor shall keep itself informed of
State and Federal Laws and regulations which, in any manner, affect
those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service
pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe'
and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers
and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by
failure of the contractor to comply with this section.
-4-
10. NOTICE: Whenever it shall be necessary for either party to serve notice
on the other respecting this Agreement, such notice shall be served by
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the
City Manager of the City of Temecula, located at 43174 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, California 92591 and the Contractor Richard Escjate.
President, ESGIL Corporateion. 9320 Chesapeake Drive.//208. San Dieao.
California 92123 unless and until different addresses may be furnished
in writing by either party to the other. Notice shall be deemed to have
been served seventy-two (72) hours after the same has been deposited
in the United States Postal Services. This shall be valid and sufficient
service of notice for all purposes.
11. ASSIGNMENT: the Contractor shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without
the prior written consent of the City.
Upon termination of this Agreement, Contractor's sole compensation shall be
the value to the City of the services rendered.
-5-
LIABILITY INSURANCE: The Contractor shall maintain insurance
acceptable to the City in full force and effect throughout the term of this
contract, against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work
hereunder by the Contractor, his agents, representatives, employees or
subcontractors. Insurance is to be placed with insurer with a Bests'
rating of no less than A:VII. The costs of such insurance shall be
included in the Contractor's bid. The Contractor shall provide the
following scope and limits of insurance:
Minimum Scooe of Insurance: Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
1. Insurance Services Office form Number GL 0002 (ed. 1/73)
covering Comprehensive General. Liability and Insurance Services
Office form number GL 0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive
General Liability; or Insurance Services Office Commercial General
'Liability coverage ("occurrence" form CG 0001 ).
2. Insurance Services Office form No. CA 0001 (Ed. 1/78) covering
Automobile Liability, code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA
0025.
3. Worker's Compensation insurance as required by Labor Code of
the State of California, an Employer's Liability insurance.
4. Errors and Omissions insurance.
Minimum Limits of Insurance: Contractor shall maintain limits of
insurance no less.than:
1. General Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence
for bodily injury and property damage.
2. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per
accident for bodily injury and property damage.
3. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Worker's
Compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of
California and Employers Liability limits of $1,000,000 per
accident.
4. Errors and Omissions Insurance: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions: Insurance policies required by
this contract shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following
provisions:
a. All Policies: Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be
endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided,
canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except
after thirty (30) day's prior written notice to the City via United
States First Class Mail.
b. General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverage: The City of
Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to
-7-
be covered as insureds as respects: Liability arising out of
activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products
and completed operations of the Contractor; premises owned,
occupied or used by the contractor, or automobiles owned,
leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall
contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded
to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
With regard to claims arising from the Contractor's performance
of the work described in this contract, the Contractor's insured
coverage shall be primary insured as respects the City of
Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any
insurance of self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers,
officials, employees or volunteers shall apply in excess of, and not
contribute with, the Contractor's insurance.
Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies
shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers,
officials, employees or volunteers.
The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with
respect the limits of the insurers liability.
Worker's Compensation and Employer's Liability Coverage: The
insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the
-8-
13.
City of Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers
for losses arising from work performed by the Contractor for the
City.
Verification of Coverage:
certificates of insurance
Contractor shall furnish the City with
effecting coverage required by this
clause. the certificates for each insurance policy are to be signed
by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its
behalf. The certificates are to be on forms provided by the City
and are to be received and approved by the City before work
commences. The City reserves the right to require complete,
certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.
Contractor shall include all subcontracts as insureds under its
policies or shall furnish separate certificates for each
subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject
to all of the requirements stated herein.
INDEMNIFICATION: The Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless
the City and its agents and employees from and against all claims,
damages, losses and expenses, including attorneys' fees, arising our of
or resulting from the Contractor's acts or omissions pursuant to this
contract.
14.
15.
16.
The City shall indemnify and hold harmless ESGIL and its agents and
employees from and against all claims, damages, losses and expenses,
including attorneys' fees, arising out of or resulting from the City's acts
or omissions pursuant tO this contract.
FREEDOM FROM LIABILITY: The Contractor and Contractor staff, when
performing duties as representative of the City, shall have the freedom
from liability contained in Section 202, of the 1988 Edition of the
Uniform Building Code.
FINAL DECISION AUTHORITY: The City's Chief Building Official shall
have final decision authority over the results of the plan check by the
Contractor and all work performed by the Contractor shall be to the
satisfaction of the Chief Building Official.
In instances where the permit applicant takes exception to the
Contractor's interpretation of the regulations contained in Title 24, the
Building Official shall render a final decision utilizing, as deemed
appropriate, the resources of the City Attorney and/or the Board of
Appeals.
ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This Agreement and any documents or instrument
attached hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions
mentioned herein or incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior
writing in respect to the subject matter hereof.
-10-
In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of
this Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and
conditions of this Agreement shall prevail.
EFFECTIVE DATE AND EXECUTION: This Agreement shall be effective from
and after the date it is signed by the representatives of the City. This Agreement may
be executed in counterparts.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
CONTRACTOR
By:
Richard Esgate, ESGil Corporation
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
-11-
EXHIBIT A ~
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
Plan Check Scooe of Work
Perform traditional preliminary plan review consultations in ESGIL
Corporation's main office by meeting or by telephone.
Perform traditional initial plan review Of submitted plans to determine
compliance with City adopted:
Uniform Building Code
Uniform Plumbing Code
Uniform Mechanical Code
National Electrical Code
California Site, Title 24 (Energy Conservation; Disabled Access;
and Noise Attenuation)
Provide the applicant's designee and the City, a typed list of items
needing clarification or change to achieve conformance with the above
regulations.
Perform all necessary liaison with the applicant's designee, either by
telephone, mail or meeting in Esgil Corporation's main office, and
perform all necessary rechecks to achieve conformance to the
regulations.
Perform all necessary liaison with the Building Official or his design.e,
either by mail, telephone or in Esgil Corporation's main office, to insure
compliance with U.B.C. Sections 105 and 106 and to insure compliance
with local policy interpretations.
Perform plan reviews of revisions to plans that have previously been
approved for permit issuance, or perform plan reviews of major changes
to plans prior to such approval, when such major changes are not
required to achieve code conformance.
Attend meetings related to proposed building projects at the request of
the Building Official at locations other than ESGIL Corporation's plan
check office·
Deliver plans to the City, perforated with the date and the word "ESGIL",
with a transmittal cover sheet noting the perforated plans "substantially
comply with the jurisdiction's Building Codes."
-12-
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
COMPLETE PLAN CHECK:
Esgil Corporation's fee shall be 80% of the Plan Review Fee calculated per
Section 304 or the latest published edition of the Uniform Building Code for
each building plan checked. The construction valuation shall be based on the
most recent valuation multiplier published by the International Conference of
Building Officials in Building Standards or on the architects; estimated
construction cost, or on the Building Official's cost estimate, whichever is
greater.
Not withstanding the above, the minimum contractor fee for plan checking a
proposed project shall be one hundred dollars ($100.00).
Plan check fee for repetitive identical buildings shall be 80% of the plan check
fee as noted above for the first, or basic building, and 20% of the plan check
fee as noted above for each additional building.
The single fee includes all rechecks and there are no additional charges for
preliminary plan check conferences at our office, expedited processing,
checking plans that are eventually found to be incomplete or for the pick-up and
delivery of plans or for meetings with the Building Official at his/her request.
PARTIAL PLAN CHECK:
Partial plan checks are discouraged due to the need to coordinate all disciplines
in a plan review, however, the fees for partial plan checks are:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Basic minimum for any plan check
Structural only
Fire-Life
U.P.C.
N.E.C.
U.M.C.
Title 24 Energy and Sound Control
Title 24 Disabled Access
50% of 1988 UBC plan check fee
10% additional
10% additional
2% additional
2% additional
2% additional
2% additional
2% additional
Total: 80% of UBC fee
PLAN CHECK OF REVISIONS TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANS:
Revisions to previously approved plans will be at Esgil Corporation's published
hourly rates shown on the "Labor Rates Schedule."
v:\wp\CONTRACT.esg
-13-
AGREEMENT
FOR CONTRACT SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this ;~4th day of August, 1993.
between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as
"City" and VandorDe Chou Associates. Inc., hereinafter referred to as "Contractor."
The parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
I. SERVICES: Contractor shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit A
attached hereto. Contractor shall complete the tasks according to the
schedule set forth in Exhibit A.
2. PERFORMANCE: Contractor shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and
to the best of his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks
described herein.
3. PAYMENT: The City agrees to pay Contractor as set forth in Exhibit B.
Contractor will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices
shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of
receipt of each invoice.
SUSPENSION. TERMINATION OR ABANDONMENT OF AGREEMENT:
The City may, at any time, suspend, terminate or abandon this
Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at
least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the
Contractor shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless
the notice provides otherwise. Within thirty-five (35) days after receiving
an invoice from the Contractor, the City shall pay Contractor for work
done through the date that work is to be ceased pursuant to this section.
If the City suspends, terminates or abandons a portion of this Agreement
such suspension, termination or abandonment shall make void or
invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
BREACH OF CONTRACT: In the event'that Contractor is in default for
cause under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no
obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work
performed after the date of default. Default shall include not performing
the tasks described herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City
Manager of the City Failure by the Contractor to make progress in the
performance work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes beyond
his control, and without fault or negligence of the Contractor, shall not
be considered a default.
If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor defaults in
the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the
Contractor with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall have ten (10) days
after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a
satisfactory performance. In the event that the Contractor fails to cure its default
within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other
provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and
without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or
under this Agreement.
6. TERM: This Agreement shall commence on Auqust 24, 1993. and shall
remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed,
but in no event later than June 30, 1994.
Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute
between the City and the Contractor arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof,
shall be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final.
Contractor shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three
retired judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration
hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure, Section
1280, et see. City and Contractor shall share the cost of the arbitration equally.
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS: Upon satisfactory completion of, or in
the event of termination, suspension of abandonment of this Agreement,
all original documents, designs, drawings and notes prepared in the
course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this
Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used,
reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of
the Contractor.
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR: The Contractor is and shall at all times
remain as to the City a wholly independent Contractor. It is expressly
understood and agreed that Contractor shall in no event as a result of
this contract be entitled to any benefits to which City employees are
entitled, including, but not limited to, overtime, any retirement benefits,
worker's compensation benefits, and injury leave or other leave benefits,
and for such purposes shall be deemed an independent Contractor.
LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Contractor shall keep itself informed of
State and Federal Laws and regulations which, in any manner, affect
those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service
pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe
and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers
and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by
failure of the contractor to comply with this section.
-4-
10. NOTICE: Whenever it shall be necessary for either party to serve notice
on the other respecting this Agreement, such notice shall be served by
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the
City Manager of the City of Temecula, located at 43174 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, California 92591 and the Contractor Neil Evans.
VandorDe Chou Associates. Inc.. 295 Rampart Street, Oranqe, California
92668 unless and until different addresses may be furnished in writing
by either party to the other. Notice shall be deemed to have been served
seventy-two (72) hours after the same has been deposited in the United
States Postal Services. This shall be valid and sufficient service of
notice for all purposes.
11. ASSIGNMENT: the Contractor shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without
the prior written consent of the City.
Upon termination of this Agreement, Contractor's sole compensation shall be
the value to the City of the services rendered.
-5-
LIABILITY INSURANCE: The Contractor shall maintain insurance
acceptable to the City in full force and effect throughout the term of this
contract, against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work
her. under by the Contractor, his agents, representatives, employees or
subcontractors. Insurance is to be placed with insurer with a Bests'
rating of no less than A:VII. The costs of such insurance shall be
included in the Contractor's bid. The Contractor shall provide the
following scope and limits of insurance:
Minimum Scooe of Insurance: Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
1. Insurance Services Office form Number GL 0002 (ed. 1/73)
covering Comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services
Office form number GL 0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive
General Liability; or Insurance Services Office Commercial General
Liability coverage ("occurrence" form CG 0001 ).
2. Insurance Services Office form No. CA 0001 (Ed. 1/78) covering
Automobile Liability, code I "any auto" and endorsement CA
0025.
3. Worker's Compensation insurance as required by Labor Code of
the State of California, an Employer's Liability insurance.
4. Errors and Omissions insurance.
Minimum Limits of Insurance: Contractor shall maintain limits of
insurance no less than:
1. General Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence
for bodily injury and property damage.
2. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per
accident for bodily injury and property damage.
3. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Worker's
Compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of
and Employers Liability limits of $1,000,000 per
California
accident.
4. Errors and Omissions Insurance: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions: Insurance policies required by
this contract shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following
provisions:
a. All Policies: Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be
endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided,
canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in-limits except
after thirty (30) day's prior written notice to the City via United
States First Class Mail.
b. General Liability and Automobile LiabiliW Coverage: The City of
Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to
-7-
be covered as insureds as respects: Liability arising out of
activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products
and completed operations of the Contractor; premises owned,
occupied or used by the contractor, or automobiles owned,
leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall
contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded
to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
With regard to claims arising from the Contractor's performance
of the work described in this contract, the Contractor's insured
coverage shall be primary insured as respects the City of
Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any
insurance of self-insurance maintained by the City., its officers,
officials, employees or volunteers shall apply in excess of, and not
contribute with, the Contractor's insurance.
Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies
shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers,
officials, employees or volunteers.
The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with
respect the limits of the insurers liability.
Worker's Compensation and Employer's LiabiliW Coverage: The
insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the
-8-
13.
City of Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers
for losses arising from work performed by the Contractor for the
City.
Verification of Coverage:
certificates of insurance
Contractor shall furnish the City with
effecting coverage required by this
clause. the certificates for each insurance policy are to be signed
by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its
behalf. The certificates are to be on forms provided by the City
and are to be received and approved by the City before work
commences. The City reserves the right to require complete,
certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.
Contractor shall include all subcontracts as insureds under its
policies or shall furnish separate certificates for each
subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject
to all of the requirements stated herein.
INDEMNIFICATION: The Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless
the City and its agents and employees from and against all claims,
damages, losses and expenses, including attorneys' fees, arising our of
or resulting from the Contractor's acts or omissions pursuant to this
contract.
-9-
The City shall indemnify and hold harmless ESGIL and its agents and
employees from and against all claims, damages, losses and expenses,
including attorneys' fees, arising out of or resulting from the City's acts
or omissions pursuant to this contract.
14. FREEDOM FROM LIABILITY: The Contractor and Contractor staff, when
performing duties as representative of the City, shall have the freedom
from liability contained in Section 202, of the 1988 Edition of the
Uniform Building Code.
15. FINAL DECISION AUTHORITY: The City's Chief Building Official shall
have final decision authority over the results of the plan check by the
Contractor and all work performed by the Contractor shall be to the
satisfaction of the Chief Building Official.
In instances where the permit applicant takes exception to the
Contractor's interpretation of the regulations contained in Title 24, the
Building Official shall render a final decision utilizing, as deemed
appropriate, the resources of the City Attorney and/or the Board of
Appeals.
16. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This Agreement and any documents or instrument
attached hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions
mentioned herein or incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior
writing in respect to the subject matter hereof.
-10o
In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of
this Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and
conditions of this Agreement shall prevail.
EFFECTIVE DATE AND EXECUTION: This Agreement shall be effective from
and after the date it is signed bY'the representatives of the City. This Agreement may
be executed in counterparts.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
CONTRACTOR
By:
Nell Evans,
Vandorpe Chou Associates, Inc.
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
-11-
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
PLAN CHECKING
Provide a complete plan check service to the City of Temecula including analysis for
compliance with the City's adopted uniform codes as follows:
Building code requirement including:
- Requirements based upon type of occupancy;
Requirements based upon type of construction;
Engineering regulations including seismic loads;
Detailed regulations of construction;
Fire resistive standards for fire protection;
Fire and life safety requirements;
Accessibility to the physically handicapped.
National Electrical Code requirements
Uniform Plumbing Code requirements
Title 24 energy conservation compliance
City's amendments to the uniform codes
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
AGREEMENT
FOR CONTRACT SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 24th day of August, 1993,
between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as
"City" and Melad and Associates, hereinafter referred to as "Contractor."
The parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
I. SERVICES: Contractor shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit A
attached hereto. Contractor shall'complete the tasks according to the
schedule set forth in Exhibit A.
2. PERFORMANCE: Contractor shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and
to the best of his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks
described herein.
3. PAYMENT: The City agrees to pay Contractor as set forth in Exhibit B.
Contractor will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices
shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of
receipt of each invoice.
e
SUSPENSION. TERMINATION OR ABANDONMENT OF AGREEMENT:
The City may, at any time, suspend, terminate or abandon this
Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at
least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the
Contractor shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless
the notice provides otherwise. Within thirty-five (35) days after receiving
an invoice from the Contractor, the City shall pay Contractor for work
done through the date that work is to be ceased pursuant to this section.
If the City suspends, terminates or abandons a portion of this Agreement
such suspension, termination or abandonment shall make void or
invalidate the 'remainder of this Agreement.
BREACH OF CONTRACT: In the event that Contractor is in default for
cause under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no
obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work
performed after the date of default. Default shall include not performing
the tasks described herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City
Manager of the City Failure by the Contractor to make progress in the
performance work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes beyond
his control, and without fault or negligence of the Contractor, shall not
be considered a default.
If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor defaults in
the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the
Contractor with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall haveten (10) days
after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a
satisfactory performance. In the event that the Contractor fails to cure its default
within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other
provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and
without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or
under this Agreement.
6. TERM: This Agreement shall commence on Aucjust 24, 1993, and shall .
remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed,
but in no event later than June 30, 19~14.
Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute
between the City and the Contractor arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof,
shall be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final.
Contractor shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three
retired judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration
hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure, Section
1280, et seq. City and Contractor shall share the cost of the arbitration equally.
'OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS: Upon satisfactory completion of, or in
the event of termination, suspension of abandonment of this Agreement,
all original documents,' designs, drawings and notes prepared in the
course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this
Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used,
reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of
the Contractor.
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR: The Contractor is and shall at all times
remain as to the City a wholly independent Contractor. It is expressly
understood and agreed that Contractor' shall in no event as a result of
this contract be entitled to any benefits to which City employees are
entitled, including, but not limited to, overtime, any retirement benefits,
worker's compensation benefits, and injury leave or other leave benefits,
and for such purposes shall be deemed an independent Contractor.
LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Contractor shall keep itself informed of
State and Federal Laws and regulations which, in any manner, affect
those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service
pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe
and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers
and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by
failure of the contractor to comply with this section.
-4-
10. NOTICE: Whenever it shall be necessary for either party to serve notice
on the other respecting this Agreement, such notice shall be served by
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the
City Manager of the City of Temecula, located at 43174 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, California 92591 and the Contractor Jose Melad
Melad and Associates. 8907 Warner Avenue. Suite 161. Huntington
Beach. California 92647 unless and until different addresses may be
furnished in writing by either party to the other. Notice shall be deemed
to have been served seventy-two (72) hours after the same has been
deposited in the United States Postal Services. This shall be valid and
sufficient service of notice for all purposes.
11. ASSIGNMENT: the Contractor shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without
the prior written consent of the City.
Upon termination of this Agreement, Contractor's sole compensation shall be
the value to the City of the services rendered.
-5-
12o ~
LIABILITY INSURANCE: The Contractor shall maintain insurance
acceptable to the City in full force and effect throughout the term of this
contract, against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work
hereunder by the Contractor, his agents, representatives, employees or
subcontractors. Insurance is to be placed with insurer with a Bests'
rating of no less than A:VII. The costs of such insurance shall be
included in the Contractor's bid. The Contractor shall provide the
following scope and limits of insurance:
Minimum Scope of Insurance: Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
1. Insurance Services Office form. Number GL 0002 (ed. 1/73)
covering Comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services
Office form number GL 0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive
General Liability; or Insurance Services Office Commercial General
Liability coverage ("occurrence" form CG 0001 ).
2. Insurance Services Office form No. CA 0001 (Ed. 1/78) covering
Automobile Liability, code I "any auto" and endorsement CA
0025.
3. Worker's Compensation insurance as required by Labor Code of
the State of California, an Employer's Liability insurance.
4. Errors and Omissions insurance. '
~-~ B. Contractor shall maintain limits of
Minimum Limits of Insurance:
insurance no less than:
1. General Liability 91,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence
for bodily injury and property .damage.
2. Automobile Liability: 91,000,000 combined single limit per
accident for bodily injury and pro. perry damage.
3. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Worker's
Compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of
California and Employers Liability limits of 91,000,000 per
accident.
4. Errors and Omissions Insurance: 91,000,000 per occurrence.
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions: Insurance policies required by
this contract shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following
provisions:
a. All Policies: Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be
endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided,
canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except
after thirty (30) day's prior written notice to the City via United
States First Class Mail.
b. General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverac)e: The City of
Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to
-7-
be covered as insureds as respects: Liability arising out of
activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products
and completed operations of the Contractor; premises owned,
occupied or used by the contractor, or automobiles owned,
leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall
contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded
to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
With regard to claims arising from the Contractor's performance
of the work described in this contract, the Contractor's insured
coverage shall be primary insured as respects. the City of
Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any
insurance of self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers,
officials, employees or volunteers shall apply in excess of, and not
contribute with, the Contractor's insurance.
Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies
shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers,
officials, employees or volunteers.
The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with
respect the limits of the insurers liability.
Worker's Compensation and Emolover's Liability Coverage: The
insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the
-8-
13.
City of Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers
for losses arising from work performed by the Contractor for the
City.
d. Verification of Coverage: Contractor shall furnish the City with
certificates of insurance effecting coverage required by this
clause. the certificates for each insurance policy are to be signed
by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its
behalf. The certificates are to be on forms provided by the City
and are to be received and approved by the City before work
commences. The City reserves the right to require complete,
certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.
Contractor shall include all subcontracts as insureds under its
policies or shall furnish separate certificates for each
subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject
to all of the requirements stated herein.
INDEMNIFICATION: The Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless
the City and its agents and employees from and against all claims,
damages, losses and expenses, including attorneys' fees, arising our of
or resulting from the Contractor's acts or omissions pursuant to this
contract.
14.
15.
16.
The City shall indemnify and hold harmless ESGIL and its agents and
employees from and against all claims, damages, losses and expenses,
including attorneys' fees, arising out of or resulting from the City's acts
or omissions pursuant to this contract.
FREEDOM FROM LIABILITY: The Contractor and Contractor staff, when
performing duties as representative of the City, shall have the freedom
from liability contained in Section 202, of the 1988 Edition of the
Uniform Building Code.
FINAL DECISION AUTHORITY: The City's Chief Building Official shall
have final decision authority over the results of the plan check by the
Contractor and all work performed by the Contractor shall be to the
satisfaction of the Chief Building Official.
In instances where the permit applicant takes exception to the
Contractor's interpretation of the regulations contained in Title 24, the
Building Official shall render a final decision utilizing, as deemed
appropriate, the resources of the City Attorney and/or the Board of
Appeals.
ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This Agreement and any documents or instrument
attached hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions
mentioned herein or incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior
writing in respect to the subject matter hereof.
-10-
In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of
this Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and
conditions of this Agreement shall prevail.
EFFECTIVE DATE AND EXECUTION: This Agreement shall be effective from
and after the date it is signed by the representatives of the City. This Agreement may
be executed in counterparts.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
CONTRACTOR
By:
Jose Melad
Melad and Associates
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
-11-
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
SERVICES:
PLAN CHECKING
Complete plan check of all types of building plans and related structures for building
permit. All plan checking will be performed by Melad and Associates, their employees
and associated consultants to ensure full compliance with all City adopted codes
(building, electrical, plumbing, mechanical), including State and Federal Regulations
related to building construction. Provide a complete plan check service to the City of
Temecula including analysis for compliance with the City's adopted uniform codes as
follows:
Building code requirement including:
Requirements based upon type of occupancy;
Requirements based upon type of construction;
Engineering regulations including seismic loads;
Detailed regulations of construction;
Fire resistive standards for fire protection;
Fire and life safety requirements;
Accessibility to the physically handicapped.
National Electrical Code requirements
Uniform Plumbing Code requirements
Title 24 energy conservation compliance
City's amendments to the uniform codes
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
COMPENSATION:
City may elect to compensate Melad and Associates an amount equal to 70%
of the plan check fee established by the City or at an hourly rate of 945.00.
Exception for repetitive plan check: 70% for model plans and 25% for
repetitive plans. Included on repetitive plan check is construction observation
for models only, to assist City Inspectors in discovering and eliminating any
deficiencies and/or clarifications on approved plans prior to start of production.
Structural plan check only: To review structural plans and calculations under
the Uniform Building Code provisions and standard engineering practice.
Compensation:
An amount equal to 45% of the building plan check fee
established by the City or an hourly rate of 945.00
State Energy Regulations, Title 24 of the State Administrative Code: Complete
plan check on building envelope, HVAC system and lighting system.
Compensation:
An amount equal to 25% of the building plan check fee
established by the .City or an hourly rate of $45.00. A
minimum fee of $100.00 is also required.
Grading plan check: To review grading and other related civil engineering work.
This work is not included on the complete plan check scope of work.
Compensation: $45.00 per hour with a minimum fee of $200.00.
Special projects for fast track (accelerated plan check will be accommodated upon
request by the City with 50% additional fee.
Checking time will be five working days minimum to fifteen working days maximum,
depending on the size and complexity of the project. Rechecks will be completed in
three to ten working days.
Included with the above services, with no additional cost to the City, is pick-up and
delivery of plans on an as-needed basis, and consultation on related matters.
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
Building Inspections: Provide general inspection services during the entire
course of construction in performances of this duty we will promptly provide
qualified combination inspectors to review the various stages of construction,
including required related State and Federal Regulations, and shall minimize or
eliminate delays to builders on account of such inspection requirements.
Compensation:
An hourly rate of $40.00 with four hours minimum plus
mileage at the rate of $.30 per mile if the City does not
provide transportation.
Melad and Associates strictly performs plan checking and inspection services. Melad
and Associates does no engineering design to avoid any conflict of interest.
ITEM
NO.
7
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
August 24, 1993
Amendment to Supplemental Agreement for Use of Community
Development Block Grant Funds
PREPARED BY: Grant M. Yates, Financial Services Administrator
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the amendment to the
supplemental agreement for the Use of Community Development Block Grant Funds.
DISCUSSION: The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program in
Fiscal Year 1992-93 included $15,000 for a Seismic Hazard Identification Program.
This program was completed by the staff of the Building and Safety Department.
When the costs were compiled after the completion of the project, it was determined
that the full $15,000 could not be realized. Therefore, it was recommended by Kevin
Palmer of the Riverside County Economic Development Agency that the City
reprogram the $15,000 into the Temecula Senior Center Project.
This reprogramming will ensure that the City will not be in danger of losing any funds'
that cannot be justified. The approval of these amended supplemental agreements is
a formal action that needs to occur before the City can recover the $15,000.
FISCAL IMPACT: These funds were not included for the Senior Center project
in the Capital Improvement Program and will be available for any additional costs
incurred for the completion of the facility.
R:WORTONLHGENDAStCDBGFUND. AGN 08/17193
ITEM
NO.
8
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL:
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER .
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Shawn Nelson, Director of Community Services
Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official-f---
August 24, 1993
Consideration of Additional Funding for Extra Work on Project No.
CSD 92-03, Temecula Old Town Senior Center
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve 1) an operating transfer of
954,200 from the Development Impact Fund to the Capital
Projects Fund and 2) appropriate 954,200 to account
,f210-199-801-5804.
DISCUSSION:
On November 10, 1992, the City Council approved an appropriation of funds in the
amount of 9486,044 for the building construction portion of the Temecula Old Town
Senior Center. As the project approaches completion, additional work is required in
order to prepare the building for occupancy.
In coordination with the State Office on Aging, a nutrition program has been
developed which will require certain improvements to be added to the building's
kitchen area which were not previously included in the original plans and
specifications such as hand and utensil wash sinks and cabinetry.
Earlier information the City received, indicating 'the building was connected to the
sewer system was in error, subsequently requiring a sewer service installation.
Included also in this request are funds for water meter, and sewer connection fees,
flooring for the building's craft room, previously to be exposed concrete, will allow for
a pool table and other various recreational uses as well as better maintenance. Also,
enlargement of the Senior Coordinator's office, and wall and monument signing is
included. The following is a breakdown of individual funding requests:
AGENDARFT%SENCTRFUNDS.824
Agenda Repo~
August 24, 1993
Page 2
2.
3.
4.
Signs - one (1) concrete monument and one (1) wall mounted .... $ 3,500
Water meter fees to Rancho California Water District .......... $ 7,000
Office modification - Senior Coordinator's office ............. $ 1,700
Sewer installation of approximately 375 linear ft. of
4" ABS sewer line including excavation and compact·on ....... $15,000
Sewer connection fee to EMWD (cost savings anticipated
due to location of existing sewer lateral) .................. $15,000
Crafts room - installation of approximately 67 square yards
of commercial grade sheet vinyl floor covering .............. $ 1,500
Kitchen - installation of base kitchen cabinets with hand
wash and service sinks installed, FRP or Marlite wall
covering and related fixture hardware ..................... $ 4,500
Material cost increase due to three (3) month delay in obtaining
a California Department Of Forestry (CDF) property lease
lumber costs increased by distributor ~. .... , ............... $ 6,000
TOTAL .................. $54.200
Original Contract ..................................... $486,044
Change Order ........................................ $ 54,200
Total Contract Amount ................................. $540,244
FISCAL IMPACT:
It is necessary to approve an operating transfer for $54,200 from the Development
Impact Fund to the Capital Projects Fund and appropriate this amount to Account #
210-199-801-5804.
AGENDARFT%$ENCTRFUND$.824
ITEM NO. 9
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
August 24, 1993
Professional Services Contract
Production Services
Fiscal Year
1993-94 Video
PREPARED BY: Grant M. Yates, Financial Services Administrator
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council award a professional services contract
to Davlin for video production services for fiscal year 1993-94.
DISCUSSION: A professional services contract was awarded to Davlin for
audio/video production on July 14, 1992. This award was a result of a selection
process that included a request for proposal in which six (6) firms submitted a
proposal. Davlin was selected as the lowest responsible bidder with a charge to
provide video services for the City Council meetings at $700 per meeting. The bids
received from the other production companies ranged from $800 - $3,200 per
meeting.
The terms of the award included a one-year contract, expiring on June 30, 1993 with
the option of three (3) additional one-year contracts based upon mutual consent of
both parties. Based upon this understanding, staff is recommending that we extend
the current contract, with no changes, through June 30, 1994.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this service are included in the City Council's
budget in Fiscal Year 1993-94.
R: WORTONL L4 GENDAStDA VL1N. A GN 08/16/93
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This Agreement was made 'and entered into this 1st day of July 1993, by and between
the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and Davlin, a sole proprietorship
hereinafter called ("Consultant").
The parties hereto mutually agree' as follows:
1. Services. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit A attached
hereto. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in Exhibit B.
2. Performance. Consultant shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best
of his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described herein.
3. Payment. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the per project]meeting
rate set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto. This amount will not exceed $20,400 for the first
year of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved by the City Council; provided that
the City Manager may approve additional payment not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the
Agreement; but in no event more than $10,000. Audio Visual Services for the City Council
meetings which run from 7:00 P.M. until the end of the meeting will total $700 per meeting.
There will be additional charges for meetings that run past 10:00 P.M. If required, payment
for audio taping the Planning Commission meetings is $150 per meeting.
Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Payment shall
be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice.
4. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended so long as such amendment is
writing and agreed upon by both the City Council and Consultant.
5. Ownership Of Audio-Video Tapes.. Upon completion of each and every City
meeting recorded by Consultant, audio and/or video tapes of said meeting shall be delivered to
the City Clerk's office by Consultant. These tapes are the sole property of the City and may
be used in any manner by the City without the permission of the Consultant.
6. Termination. The City may terminate this Agreement without cause so long as
written notice of intent 'to terminate is given to Consultant at least thirty (30) days prior to the
Agreement termination date of June 30, 1994. In the event of termination, Consultant shall be
paid for the services performed. Consultant may terminate this Agreement without cause so long
as written notice of intent to terminate is given to the City at least thirty (30) days prior to the
Agreement termination date of June 30, 1994.
7. Indemnification. The 'Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City
of Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all
claims, demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its
officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for
injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultants acts or omissions
under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of
the City.
8. Status of Consultant. Consultant is an independent contractor in all respects in
the performance of this Agreement and shall not be considered an employee of the City for any
purpose. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement.
Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other
compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable
for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of
performing services hereunder.
9. Term. This Agreement shall commence on July 1, 1993, and shall remain and
continue in effect until June 30, 1994. At that time the contract may be extended on a fiscal
year basis under terms and conditions to be mutually agreed upon prior to the start of that fiscal
year, but in no event later than June 30, 1996.
10. Subcontracts. The Consultant shall not enter into any subcontracts for services
to be rendered toward the completion of the Consultant's portion of this Agreement without the
consent of the City. At all times, Davlin shall be primarily responsible for the performance of
the tasks described herein.
11. Default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of
this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant
for any work performed after the date of default. Default shall include not performing the tasks
described herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager of the City. Failure by the
Consultant to continue in the performance of work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes
beyond his control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, shall not be considered
a default.
Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between
the City and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall be resolved
in arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final.
Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three
retired judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration hearing
shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1280, et sea_. City
and Consultant shall share the cost of the arbitration equally.
R: tlqORTO NL t GRA NTtA GR-05 08/12t'95
12. Notices. Notices shall be given pursuant to this Agreement by personal service
on the party to be notified, or by written notice upon such party deposited in the custody of the
United States Postal Service addressed as follows:
a. City:
Attention: City Manager
City of Temecula
43 174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Davlin
43122 Via Dos Picos, Suite A
Tcmecula, CA 92590
The notices shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of personal service,
or three(3) days after the date of deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal
Service.
13. Entire Agreement. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached
hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental
hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the subject matter hereof.
In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this
Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement
shall prevail.
14. Liability. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries,
wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City
shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness
arising out of performing services hereunder.
Consultant agrees to indemnify, release and hold harmless the City, its officers,
agents, employees, and representatives for all claims or losses the City may suffer resulting from
any negligent actions or omissions by Consultant.
R: IbI ORTO RL ~ GRA NT'M GR-0 5 08/1
15. Licenses. Consultant and subconsultant shall obtain all necessary licenses,
including but not limited to City Business Licenses.
The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above
written.
By:
CONSULTANT
Title
By:
CITY OF TEMECULA
J. Sal Mufioz, Mayor
A'ITEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
R : INORTO NL I GRA NTtA GR-O5
08/12/93
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
Audio-Video taping of City Council Meetings.
Audio taping of Planning Commission Meetings.
Duplication of audio-video tapes.
Additional Services as Required
Audio taping of additional City Commission Meetings.
Video taping of special City Meetings.
R:~NORTONL~GRANTMGR-05 08/12/~$
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
*Two City Council Meetings per month at:
$700 per meeting X 24 =
$16,800.
*Two Planning Commission Meetings per month at:
$150 per meeting X 24 =
$20,400.
Additional City Commission Meetings - $125 per meeting
Special City Meetings (audio-video) - $700 per meeting
*Audio and video tape stock shall be supplied by Davlin, and will be invoiced separately.
'~ R: INO RTO NL I GRANI'tA GR .-0.5 08/1
ITEM NO. 10
APPROVAT.
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
,,1~ Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
August 24, 1993
Community Facilities District 88-12
Reimbursement Agreements for Work Performed During
Construction of the Ynez Road Widening Project (PW92-05)
the
PREPARED BY:
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve reimbursement agreements with the Rancho California Water
District and Kernper Real Estate Management Company for improvements to be constructed
by the City's Contractor for the Ynez Road Widening Project PW92-05.
BACKGRO'UND:
During the design of the Ynez Road Widening Project, improvements and relocations to the
Rancho California Water District water facilities and utility improvements to the adjacent
vacant property were requested. The Rancho California Water District and the property
owner, Kernper Real Estate requested the City include these items in the construction contract
for the road improvements. The City would then be reimbursed for the improvement cost.
The amount of reimbursement for the Rancho California Water District and Kernper Real Estate
facilities is based on the bid prices as specified under the contract awarded by the City to the
Vance Corporation for the street improvements.
FISCAL IMPACT:
All costs associated with the reimbursement agreement will be paid for by the Rancho
California Water District and Kemper Real Estate with no fiscal impact to the City.
pwOS~agdrpt~93~.O824~pw92-06
REIHBURSEHENT AGREEHENT
BETWEEN
CITY OF TEMECUL~
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 88-12
YNEZ ROAD WIDENING
PRO~ECT NO. PW92-05
KRDC, INC.
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 19th day of May,
1993, is by and between the City of Temecula, a California
Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY"),
representing Community Facilities District 88-12, and KRDC, Inc.,
a California corporation (hereinafter referred to as "KRDC").
In consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and
conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
Section 1. PURPOSE OF THE AGREEMENT. The purpose of this
Agreement is to establish the reimbursement to CITY by KRDC for
the cost of constructing certain water and sewer improvements
made necessary by the Ynez Road Widening Project, hereinafter
referred to as "PROJECT."
Section 2. KRDC shall reimburse CITY for one hundred
percent (100%) of the actual costs (hereinafter referred to as
LEGAL93\8812REIM.AGN
051893LDPrg
- 1 -
"REIMBURSEMENT") for the construction of certain water and sewer
improvements within the PROJECT area consisting of the following
items as shown within the attached Bid Result Spreadsheet. The
REIMBURSEMENT shall not exceed the following cost:
Items to be Reimbursed
Bid Items 129 through 137
Bid Amount
$ 64,539.20
Costs are based on construction bids received for the
PROJECT under "Additive Items" shown within the attached Bid
Result Spreadsheet. CITY has evaluated and analyzed all bids
received and selected the lowest responsible bidder for the
PROJECT as J.L. Vance (hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR").
Section 3. It is acknowledged that KRDC has reviewed and
approved the CITY street improvement plans for the construction
of the water and sewer improvements prepared by J.F. Davidson,
dated December 3, 1992. Management. and administration of the
terms expressed herein shall be performed by CITY for the
PROJECT. CITY agrees to designate Mr. Don Spagnolo as the
contact for CITY in regards to this agreement. KRDC agrees to
designate Greg Erickson as a point of contact for KRDC to
facilitate the reimbursements identified herein.
LEGAL93\8812RE Z 14. AGH
051893LDPf'g
-- 2 --
Section 4. INSPECTION. KRDC shall provide inspection for
certain constructed facilities, specifically, Bid Items 129
through 137. KRDC shall pay all costs for inspection of Bid
Items 129 through 137, provided, however, the costs for
inspection shall reasonably reflect the proportion of the
REIMBURSEMENT to the PROJECT and in no event shall the costs of
inspection exceed five percent (5%) of the REIMBURSEMENT.
Section 5. NOTICES.
be sent as follows:
All notices under this Agreement shall
KRDC:
KRDC, Inc.
28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 100
Temecula, California 92590
Attn: Legal Department
CITY:
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Either party may change its address for notices by notifying
the other party. All notices given at the most recent address
specified shall be deemed to have been properly given.
Section 6. CITY shall cause the work described in Section 2
to be performed in a good, workmanlike and lien-free manner in
conformance with the plans described in Section 3 prior to
December 31, 1993. KRDC shall have no obligation to reimburse
LEGALg~\8812REIH.AGII
05189~LDPrg
- 3 -
the CITY for defective work or work performed after December 31,
1993.
This Agreement is dated as of the date set forth above.
KRDC:
KRDC, INC., a California corporation
By: Kemper Real Estate Management Company,
a Delaware corporation
Csaba F. Ko, Vice President
CITY:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
By:
LEGAL93\8812RE ! II. AGII
051893LDPrg
- 4 -
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 88-12
YNE2 ROAD WIDENING
PROTECT NO, PW92-05
KRDC# INC.
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 19th day of May,
1993, is by and between the City of Temecula, a California
Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY"),
representing Community Facilities District 88-12, and KRDC, Inc.,
a California corporation (hereinafter referred to as "KRDC").
In consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and
conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
Section 1. PURPOSE OF THE AGREEMENT. The purpose of this
Agreement is to establish the reimbursement to CITY by KRDC for
the cost of constructing certain water and sewer improvements
made necessary by the Ynez Road Widening Project, hereinafter
referred to as "PROJECT."
Section 2. KRDC shall reimburse CITY for one hundred
percent (100%) of the actual costs (hereinafter referred to as
LEGAL93\8812REIH.AGM
051893LDPrg
- 1 -
"REIMBURSEMENT") for the construction of certain water and sewer
improvements within the PROJECT area consisting of the following
items as shown within the attached Bid Result Spreadsheet. The
REIMBURSEMENT shall not exceed the following cost:
Items to be Reimbursed
Bid Items 129 through 137
Bid Amount
$ 64,539.20
Costs are based on construction bids received for the
PROJECT under "Additive Items" shown within the attached Bid
Result Spreadsheet. CITY has evaluated and analyzed all bids
received and selected the lowest responsible bidder for the
PROJECT as J.L. Vance (hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR").
Section 3. It is acknowledged that KRDC has reviewed and
approved the CITY street improvement plans for the construction
of the water and sewer improvements prepared by J.F. Davidson,
dated December 3, 1992. Management and administration of the
terms expressed herein shall be performed by CITY for the
PROJECT. CITY agrees to designate Mr. Don Spagnolo as the
contact for CITY in regards to this agreement. KRDC agrees to
designate Greg Erickson as a point of contact for KRDC to
facilitate the reimbursements identified herein.
LEC, AL93\8812RE ! 14. AGI4
051893LDPrg
- 2 -
Section 4. INSPECTION. KRDC shall provide inspection for
certain constructed facilities, specifically, Bid Items 129
through 137. KRDC shall pay all costs for inspection of Bid
Items 129 through 137, provided, however, the costs for
inspection shall reasonably reflect the proportion of the
REIMBURSEMENT to the PROJECT and in no event shall the costs of
inspection exceed five percent (5%) of the REIMBURSEMENT.
Section 5. NOTICES.
be sent as follows:
All notices under this Agreement shall
KRDC:
KRDC, Inc.
28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 100
Temecula, California 92590
Attn: Legal Department
CITY:
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Either party may change its address for notices by notifying
the other party. All notices given at the most recent address
specified shall be deemed to have been properly given.
Section 6. CITY shall cause the work described in Section 2
to be performed in a good, workmanlike and lien-free manner in
conformance with the plans described in Section 3 prior to
December 31, 1993. KRDC shall have no obligation to reimburseI
LEGAL93\8812RE ! 14. AGN
051893LDPrg
-- 3 --
the CITY for defective work or work performed after December 31,
1993.
This Agreement is dated as of the date set forth above.
KRDC, INC., a California corporation
By: Kemper Real Estate Management Company,
By:
a Delaware corporation
Csaba F. Ko, Vice President
CITY:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
By:
LEGAL93\8812RE ! N. AGM
051893LDPrg
- 4 -
51_~T BY:
.-,-,, 3-22-93: ~:2.~P.~: CITY OF TL:'1IECLL-~-
REIMBURSEMXNT
BETWEEN
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 88-12
Xlq~2 ROAD WIDENINQ
PRO~ECT NO. PW92-05
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day
of , 1993, is by and between the City of
Temecula, a California Municipal Corporation, (hereinafter re-
ferred to as "CITY"), representing Community Facilities District
88-12, and Rancho California Water District, a California Water
District existing and operating under Division 13 of the Califor-
nia Water Code, (hereinafter referred to as "RCWD").
In consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and
conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
Section 1. PURPOSE OF THE AGREEMENT. The purpose of this
Agreement is to establish the reimbursement to CITY by RCWD for
the cost of relocating certain water improvements made necessary
by the Ynez Road Widening Project, hereinafter referred to as
"PROJECT."
Section 2. RCWD shall reimburse CITY for one hundred
percent (100%) of the costs (hereinafter referred to as
"REIMBURSEMENT"), for the relocation and adjustments of certain
1030121. AGR
water improvements within the PROJECT area that are affected by
the PROJECT. The costs for the REIMBURSEMENT to CITY by RCWD
shall include the following items as shown within the attached
Bid Result Spreadsheet:
A. Water Items
Bid Items 109
through 127, excluding
Item 116
Extended Bid Amounts
$ 70,236.00
Engineering Costs
for adjustments of
Water Facilities
associated with RCWD's
4S-inch waterline project
$ 3,000.00
Temporary Relocation
Of Electrical Guy Poles
East Side of Ynez Road,
south of Solana Way, North
of Rancho California Road
(to facilitate installation
of proposed roadway and
48-inch waterline
improvements)
$ 10,021.61
Section 3. In the event the temporary relocation of the
above guy poles becomes unnecessary, CITY and RCWD agree that
Item 2C. under this Agreement shall be voided.
Costs are based on construction bids received for the
PROJECT under "Water Items" shown within the attached Bid Result
Spreadsheet. CITY has evaluated and analyzed all bids received
and selected the lowest responsible bidder for the PROJECT as
1030121. AGR 2
J.L. Vance (hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR"). RCWDhas
reviewed the bids and approved CITYws selection of CITYwe CON-
TRACTOR prior to the commencement of the work on the PROJECT.
RCWD shall maintain as a contingency an amount equal to ten
percent (10%) of the total estimated costs of relocating the
water facilities to account for unforeseen change orders. Prior
to the approval of any change orders associated with the reloca-
tion of these facilities, CITY shall obtain approval from RCWD
before authorizing CONTRACTOR to proceed. CITY shall make
payment to CONTRACTOR for work performed. Actual costs shall be
identified and billed to RCWD for payment on the following basis:
A. The Construction Schedule for PROJECT pro-
vides that the water facilities relocation shall
occur on or aboutdays after the .o-
rice to Proceed with the PROJECT has been issued.
Fifty percent (50%) of the REIMBURSEMENT shall be
due and payable to CITY fourteen (14) days after
RCWD receives notice from the City that relocation
of the water facilities has begun.
B. The remaining fifty percent (50%) REIM-
BURSEMENT to CITY by RCWD shall be due and
payable within thirty (30) days after the
1030121. AGR 3
entire PROJECT is accepted as complete by
CITY and RCWD.
Section 4. It is acknowledged that RCWD has reviewed and
approved all CITY plans and specifications for the relocation of
the water improvements and has approved the bid amounts as
reasonable. Management and administration of the terms expressed
herein shall be performed by CITY for the PROJECT. CITY agrees
to designate Mr. Don Spagnolo as the contact for CITY in regards
to this agreement. RCWD agrees to designate Mr. Steve Brannon as
a point of contact for RCWD to facilitate the reimbursements
identified herein.
Section 5. INSPECTION. RCWD shall provide inspection for
all water relocated facilities, specifically, Bid Items 109
through 127 excluding Item 116. RCWD shall pay all costs for
inspection of Bid Items 109 through 127, excluding Item 116.
Section 6. NOTICES. All notices under this Agreement shall
be sent as follows:
District:
Rancho California Water District
28061 Diaz Road
Post Office Box 9017
Temecula, California 92589-9017
City:
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attn: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer
1030121 .AGR 4
Either party may change its address for notices by notifying
the other party. All notices given at the most recent address
specified shall be deemed to have been properly given.
This Agreement is dated as of the date set forth above.
District:
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
By:
City:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
By:
1030121 .A~R 5
GI'|'Y Or*' 'I/:2d~WLA*-,
71~7555(545;~ 8/D
REIMBURBEMEMT XGREF,)~FE
BBTREEN
CITY OF TEMECULa
CO)O(UNITY FACZLITIEB DISTRICT 88-12
YN~2 ROXDWXDENXNO
PRCkT~CT NO. I~92-05
ItXNCHO CXLIFORNIXFATER DIBTRICT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day
of , 1993, is by and between the City of
Temecula, a California Municipal Corporation, (hereinafter re-'
ferred to as "CITY"), representing Community Facilities District
88-12, and Rancho California Water District, a California Water
District existing and operating under Division 13 of the Califor-
nia Water Code, (hereinafter referred to as "RCWD").
In consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and
conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
Section 1. PURPOSE OF THE AGREEMENT. The purpose of this
Agreement is to establish the reimbursement to CITY by RCWD for
the cost of relocating certain water improvements made necessary
by the Ynez Road Widening Project, hereinafter referred to as
"PROJECT."
Section 2. RCWD shall reimburse CITY for one hundred
percent (100%) of the costs (hereinafter referred to as
"REIMBURSEMENT"), for the relocation and adjustments of certain
1030121 .AQR
water improvements within the PROJECT area that are affected by
the PROJECT. The costs for the REIMBURSEMENT to CITY by RCWD
shall include the following items as shown within the attached
Bid Result Spreadsheet:
Water Items
Bid Items 109
through 127, excluding
Item 116
Extended Bid Amounts
$ 70,236.00
~ngineering Costs
for adjustments of
Water Facilities
associated with RCWD*s
4S-inch waterline project
$ 3,000.00
Temporary Relocation
Of Electrical Guy Poles
East Side of Ynez Road,
south of Solana Way, North
of Rancho California Road
(to facilitate installation
of proposed roadway and
4S-inch waterline
improvements)
$ 10,021.61
Section 3. In the event the temporary relocation of the
above guy poles becomes unnecessary, CITY and RCWD agree that
Item 2C. under this Agreement shall be voided.
Costs are based on construction bids received for the
PROJECT under "Water Items" shown within the attached Bid Result
Spreadsheet. CITY has evaluated and analyzed all bids received
and selected the lowest responsible bidder for the PROJECT as
1030121 .AGR 2
J.L. Vance (hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR"). RCWD has
reviewed the bids and approved CITYts se}ection of CITY~s CON-
TRACTOR prior to the commencement of the work on the PROJECT.
RCWD shall maintain as a contingency an amount equal to ten
percent (10%) of the total estimated costs of relocating the
water facilities to account for unforeseen change orders. Prior
to the approval of any change orders associated with the reloca-
tion of these facilities, CITY shall obtain approval from RCWD
before authorizing CONTRACTOR to proceed. CITY shall make
payment to CONTRACTOR for work performed. Actual costs shall be
identified and billed to RCWD for payment on the following basis:
A. The Construction Schedule for PROJECT pro-
vides that the water facilities relocation shall
occur on or about &~)~ days after the No-
tice to Proceed with the PROJECT has been issued.
Fifty percent (50%) of the REIMBURSEMENT shall be
due and payable to CITY fourteen (14) days after
RCWD receives notice from the City that relocation
of the water facilities has begun.
B. The remaining fifty percent (50%) REIM-
BURSEMENT to CITY by RCWD shall be due and
payable within thirty (30) days after the
~oso~2~ .A~ 3
entire PROJECT is accepted as complete by
CITY and RCWD.
Sectton 4. It is acknowledged that RCWD has reviewed and
approved all CITY plans and Specifications for the relocation of
the water improvements and has approved the bid amounts as
reasonable. Management and administration of the terms expressed
herein shall be performed by CITY for the PROJECT. CITY agrees
to designate Mr. Don Spagnolo as the contact for CITY in regards
to this agreement. RCWD agrees to designate Mr. Steve Brannon as
a point of contact for RCWD to facilitate the reimbursements
identified herein.
Section 5. INSPECTION. RCWD shall provide inspection for
all water relocated facilities, specifically, Bid Items 109
through 127 excluding Item 116. RCWD shall pay all costs for
inspection of Bid Items 109 through 127, excluding Item 116.
Section 6. NOTICES. All notices under this Agreement shall
be sent as follows:
District:
Rancho California Water District
28061 Diaz Road
Post Office Box 9017
Temecula, California 92589-9017
City:
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attn: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer
1030121 .AGR 4
Either party may change its address for notices by notifying
the other party. All notices given at the most recent address
specified shall be deemed to have been properly given.
This Agreement is dated as of the date set forth above.
District:
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
By:
City:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
By:
1030121 .AGR 5
-/:
I
CITY 01-'
i
ITEM NO. I 1
CITY MANAGER /~;~.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
/]/]~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
August 24, 1993
Adoption of Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan Fees-Amendment No. 2
PREPARED BY: Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Adopt a Resolution Entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MURRIETA ADOPTING
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE MURRIETA CREEK AREA DRAINAGE AREA PLAN.
2. Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-14
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 90-04
REGARDING MURRIETA CREEK AREA DRAINAGE PLAN FEES FOR SUBDIVISIONS.
3. Approve the Notice of Exemption from the provisions of the Environmental Quality Act,
as amended, for the Adoption of an Amendment to an Ordinance to collect drainage fees for
subdivisions.
BACKGROUND:
On August 10, 1993 the City Council read by title and introduced Ordinance No. 93-14
amending Ordinance No 90-04 regarding Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan Fees for
subdivisions.
The periodic adoption of these County determined and adopted fees is established under
"Rules and Regulations for the Administration of Area Drainage Plans" pursuant to County
-1 - pw01 \agdrpt%93\O824~adpfeea
Board Resolution No. 90-059. The Board adopts both a resolution adopting Amendments to
the Area Drainage Plans and amendments to Ordinance No. 460 (Section 10.25 (J)).
Under the "Rules and Regulations" the cities are then to adopt these amendments, both plan
and fees, thereby permitting the County to exact those fees for projects within the City
boundary and for City participation in fees collected within the unincorporated county areas
within the Sub-watersheds of the pertinent Area Drainage Plans.
The resolution, as submitted, is to adopt the amendment (Amendment No. 2) to the Murrieta
Creek Area Drainage Plan. The ordinance adopts the amended fees and was introduced at the
August 10, 1993 Council meeting.
The Notice of Exemption has been filed with the County Recorders office in accordance with
Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507. The Planning
Director has determined that the fee structure has already been adopted and the current action
only increases these fees.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. 93-
Ordinance No. 93-14
Notice of Exemption
Exhibit A: Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan Map
Exhibit B: Riverside County Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 93-100
(Amendment No. 2 to Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan)
Exhibit C: ADP Cost Summary
Revised Drainage Fees
Exhibit D: Previous ADP Cost Summary
-2- pwO 1%agdrpt%93%O824%edpfeee
RESOLUTION NO. 93-_
A RESOLUTION OF TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY
OF TEMECULA ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. i TO TIlE
MURI~IF~TA CREEK AREA DRAINAGE PLAN
WHEREAS, on January 8, 1991, by Resolution No. 91-02, the City Council adopted
the Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan and Fee Update which implements area-wide flood
control and Fee update which implements area-wide flood control projects directly benefitting
the City of Temecula; and
WHEREAS, on April 6, 1993, the County of Riverside, with'Resolution No. 93-100,
adopted Amendment No. 2 to the Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan and revised drainage fees
for the five subwatersheds within the drainage area of the plan; and
WHEREAS, a noticed public hearing has been held by the City Council at which time
all interested persons had the opportunity to appear and be heard on the matter of adopting the
revised schedule of drainage fees;
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The project is exempt from the provisions of the Califomia
Environmental Quality Act and a Notice of Exemption has been prepared.
Section 2. Subdivision and development of property within the planned local
drainage area will require the construction of the facilities described in the Murrieta Creek Area
Drainage Plan.
Section 3. The revised estimated cost of the facilities and the recommended
revised drainage fees are correct, necessary and fairly apportioned within the drainage area, both
on the basis of the need for drainage facilities created by the proposed subdivision and
development of all properties within the drainage area.
Section 4. The City of Temecula hereby adopts Exhibit "A" attached hereto
as Amendment No.. 2 to the Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan and revised drainage fees for
the five. subwatersheds within the drainage area of the plan.
5~r~sos~322 1
Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution and
shall cause the same to be posted as required by law.
J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
5~x~sos~322 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 93-__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the __ day of ,1993, by the following vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
~resos~322 3
ORDINANCE NO. 93-14
AN ORDINANCE OF TIlE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING
ORDINANCE N0.90-04 REGARDING MUI~F~TA CREEK AREA
DRAINAGE PLAN FEES FOR SUBDMSIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES l-r!~.l~l~.ny ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Subsection J (10) of Section 10.25 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 460
adopted by reference by City of Temecula Ordinance No. 90-04, is hereby amended to read as
follows:
A. Murrieta Creek ADP
1. Wlldomar Subwatershed $4,952 per acre
2. Murrieta Valley Subwatershed $3,985 per acre
3. Temecula Valley Subwatershed $2,291 per acre
4. Santa Gertrudis Valley
Subwatershed $1,179 per acre
5. Warm Springs Valley Subwatershed $ 677 per acre
Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect sixty (60) days after its
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this
Ordinance to be posted and published as required by law.
PASSED, APPROVF~D, AND ADOPTED, this 24th day of August, 1993.
J. Sal Mufioz, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEhL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVFASIDE)
CITY OF TEMECULA)
SS
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 93-14 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the 10th day of August, 1993, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the 24th day of August, 1993 by the following roll call vote:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
NOES:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
City of Temecula
43174 Business P~rk Drive · Temecula, Californi~ 92590
August 13, 1993
[909J 694-1989 · FAX (9091 694-1999
Richard Haworth
County Clerk and Recorders Office
County of Riverside
P.O. Box 75 1
Riverside, CA 92501-075 1
SUBJECT:
Filing of a Notice of Exemption for the Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan
Fees
Dear Mr. Haworth:
Enclosed is the Notice of Exemption for the Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan Fees. In
addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) please find a check in the amount of
$50.00, for the $50.00 County Administrative fee to enable the City to f'de the Notice of
Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code
Regulations 1507.
If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact the Planning Department at (909)
694-6400.
Sincerely,
Gary Thornhill
Director of Planning
Enclosure
R:\S~PLANN1NG\MURCREF, K.NOi!i 8/13/93 tjs ..
City of Temecula
Planning Department
Notice of Exemption
TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM:
County of Riverside
P.O. Box 751
Riverside, CA 92501-.0751
Project Title:
Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan Fees
planning Department
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Description of Project:
tAdoption of an Amendment to an Ordinance to collect
subdivisions
drainage fees for
Project Location:
City Wide, in the City of Temecuh, County of Riverside, California.
Project Applicant/Proponent: City of Temecula
The __ Planning Commission X City Council approved the above described project on August 24, 1993,
found that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, as mended.
Exempt Status: (check one)
Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); Sec. 15268);
Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080Co)C3); Sec. 15269(a));
Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); See. 15269(b)(c));
Statutory Exemptions (Section Number: )
Categorical Exemption: Class (Section Number
Other: Section 15061Co)(3)
Statement of Reasons Supporting the Finding that the Project is Exempt:
and
The project will clearly have no impacts on the environment since the fees are already adopted and they are only being
increased.
Contact Person/Title: Gary Thornhill, Planning Director
Signature: /~ ~,i~
Phone Number: (909) 694-6400
Date: tr//z--/~' .~
R:\SXPLANNING\MURCRF. F,K.NOE 8113193 tjs
"~' . . EXHIBIT'A
EXHIBIT B
AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO
MURRIETA CREEK AREA DRAINAGE PLAN
Adopted April 6, 1993
Resolution No. 93-100
UDdatinq ReQuirement - This amendment is prepared in accordance with RIverside
County Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 86-29 "Adopting Murrieta Creek Area
Drainage Plan", which states in part:
"that the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
is directed to prepare an update of this plan at ]east every two years to
reflect changed conditions, inf]ationary or deflationary trends, revised
general or specific plans, and approved development and drainage plans
which will require changes in facility configuration cost estimates and
drainage fees."
Facility Changes - No changes have been made on the facilities since the
adoption of Amendment No. 1 in January 1990.
New Facilities - Murrieta Line F-3, Santa Gertrudis Channel, Wildomar Lateral
A are all 100% complete. Warm Springs Channel, Murrieta Line F-l, Wildomar
Channel and Wildomar Lateral C are all partially constructed.
Future Facilities - Lines F, D and E are presently being designed.
Recommendations - It is the District's recommendation that the Board revise
the drainage fees for the five subwatersheds to reflect inflationary trends in
construction and right of way cost. The increase in construction cost is
based upon new costing quantities using 1992 unit prices. Right of way cost
are based upon the recommendations of the County's Real Property Management
Division.
EXHIBIT C
14JRR~_'~'TA CREEX A31EA DRAINAGE PLAR
COST SUmmARY (P=eviou~)
Santa
Wildsmar ))Jrrteta Temecula Gertrudis Warm Sprtn~s Area Drainage
¥ all e y . Valley Vall· y Val 1 ey V all ey Pi an
Facility Total Cost ~Total Cost Total Cost Total Cost Total Cost Total Cost
X.W MufTieta Cre~k Ca. $5.5%5,000 $22,69q,000 $~,6Oq,O00 ~,69B,OO0 ~8,O99,000 $53,610,O00
M Santa C-ertrudis C~. 7,132,OOO 7,132,OOO
H War= Springs Ch. 2,O80,000 2,080,OO0
X Line A 1~7,0OO 1~7,0OO
M Line C 127,OOO lZ7,OOO
H Linc C,-1 86,000 55,OOO
~ Line D ~,'913,000 ~,9~3,OOO
M Line D-~ .297,000 297,000
X Line r_ 2,~5,0OO 2,395,000
Y. Line ~-1 253,0OO 253,000
H Line E-2 ~38,0OO ~3B,OOO
M Line r__~ ~4,0OO
H. Line r_~ 215,OOO 2]5,000
M Line E-5 77,OOO 77,OOO
H Line F 3,~5% ,OOO 3,q5% ,OOO
M Line F-~ 1,~,0OO
H Line F-2 9~ ,OOO 91,0OO
M Line .r-3 59% ,0OO 591 ,CO0
X Line G 1 ,L>SO,OO0 1,260,O00
H Line H ~99,0OO 3~9,000
M Line J 1,39~,0OO
~ ~"'. K 591 ,OOO 59~ ,030
M L (~45,0OO 645,030
M L..,e L-1 58,000 58,000
Y. Line H 158,030
~ Line ~-~ 79,030 79,030
.4 Line X ~88,030 ~88,OOO
M Line P ~78,030 ~78,OOO
~ ~. 79 Crossing ]~O,OO0 ]~O,OOO
M R] Crossing 6q5,030 645,0OO
V Wildc~ar Channel 2,O9~,C00 2,0~S,030
W La~erai A (>59,000 669,000
W La~-~ra! B ~-B~ ,030 ~g~" ,0OO
W Lateral ,B-I i>56,C00 266,0OO
W ~cer-.1 c 2,330,000 2.330,CK)0
v Lateral C--I 2q2,0CX3 2~2,030
V Line D 1B,CX30 18.030
': '-=~eral E ~95,CXDO ~96,C~. '.
V Lateral E-I 2~,030 23,000
w Wildchar Ch. Debri~ =_asin 22~,000 22~,000
W Lat. eral A De~rl~ Basin ~55,030 ~55,000.
S12,S17,030 ~39 ,522 ,000 $8,96~,030 &16,~75,000 $10,519,O30 ~88,2F7,000
Costs ~hovn m~ve incl~e Construc',ion (wf31% e~£ineering, c<mtingencies md md~intstration) ~d Right or way
co~s. ~ letter pre~.eding each line o~_~l~nation (M or W) refers t,o t,~e appropriaLe Ba~er Drain~e Plan
{~,zrrieca or Wildomit) ~t~,re t2x preliminary design plans c~n be foLr~.
EXHIBIT C
AMENDMENT NO. 2
MURRIETA CPJ~EK
AREA DRAINAGE PLAN
REVISED DRAINAGE FEES
The current drainage fees for the five sub-watersheds are:
Sub-Watershed Fee
Wildomar Valley
Murrieta Valley
Temecula Valley
· Santa Gertrudis Valley
Warm Springs Valley
$4952/acre
$4139/acre
$2291/acre
$1179/acre
$ 677/acre
*M.C. = Murrieta Creek Channel
,S.G. = Santa Gertrudis Channel
*W.S. = Warm Springs Channel
Percentage Applied Toward
Local Major
Facilities Facilities
*M.C. *S.G.
54.93% 45.07% 0
43.48% 56.52% 0
4.09% 95.91% 0
.4.18% 58.26% 37.56%
3.04% 80.86% 0
*W.S.
0
0
0
0
16.10%
ZS:mcv
adp7a
EXHIBIT D
Facility
Wildomar
Valley
Total Cost
M,W Murrieta
Creek Channel
M Santa Gert. Ch
M Warm Springs Ch.
Line A
Line C
Line C-!
Line D
Line D-!
Line E
Line E-!
Line E-2
Line E-3
Line E-4
Line E-5
Line F
Line F-!
Hx_Line F-2
ne F-3
Ine G
Line H
Line j
Line K
Line L
Line L-1
Line M
Line M-1
Line N
6,412,213
Line P
Hwy. 79~Crossing
~R3 Crossing
Wildomar Ch. 2,291,877
Lateral A 668,804
La=era! B 604,644
Lateral B-1 '312,225
Lateral C 2,237,497
Lateral C-! 303,424
Line D 17,688
Lateral E 600,122
Lateral E-1 27,221
Wildomar Ch. 255,229
Debris Basin
W Lateral A 495,152
Debris Basin
Subarea
Totals $14,226,096
~Q{ENDMENT 2
TABLE
MURRIETA CREEK AREA DP, AINAGE
COST SUMMARY
PLAN
Santa Warm Area
Murrieta Temecula Gertrudis Springs Drainage
Valley Valley Valley Valley Plan
Total Cost Total Cost Total Cost Total Cost Total Cost
10,003,869
26,387,069'
11,065/186
10,869,639
64,737,976
7,132,924 7,132,924
2,164,081 2,164,08!
169,902 169,902
152,473 152,473
104,513 104,513
2,975,792 2,975,792
403,635 403,635
2,587,109 2,587,109
283,451 283,451
536,366 536,366
114,376 114,376
288,803 288,803
84,884 84,884
4,134,481 4,134,48!
1,720,108 1,720,108
110,171 110,171
591,012 591,012
1,412,416 1,412,4!6
486,549 486,549
1,611,457 1,611,457
675,847 675,847
759,655 759,655
60,787 60,787
176,591 176,591
94,869 94,869
610,736
610,736 583,306
583,306 408,538 408,538
793,407 793,407
2,291,877
668,804'
604,644f
312,225
2,237,497
303,424
17,688
600,122
27,221
255,229
495,152
$46,689,471 510,430,757 $18,991,517 $13,442,258
Grand Total $103,780,099
ITEM NO. 12
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
AG~ NO. 92-1 BETWEEN THE CITY OF
TEMECLIA AND THE T~TNFr~LT} SCHOOL FOR A TEN
YEAR PERIOD TO ENSURE THE DEVI~J()P1Vw. NT OFTHE
PROJECT AS SENIOR HOUSING, CONGREGATE CARE
FACILITY, SKII.LEI} NURSING, PERSONAL CARE, A
NINE HOLE PRIVATE GOLF COURSE AND DEDICATION
OF A 2.3 NET ACRE PARCEL TO ~ CITY OF
TEMECLrLA FOR A SENIOR CENTER LOCATED NORTH
OF PAUBA ROAD, SOUTH OF RANClIO VISTA ROAD
AND FAST OF THE TEMECULA VALLEY ltlGH SCHOOL.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65867.5, Development Agreement No.
92-1, the Development Agreement for the Linfield School site, a copy of which is on file with
the City Clerk, is hereby approved.
Section 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute said Development Agreement on
behalf of the City of Temecula after execution there of by all landowners listed therein, provided
all such landowners have executed said Development Agreement within 30 days after adoption
of this Ordinance.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this
Ordinance to be posted and published as required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this 24th day of August, 1993.
ATTEST:
:
J. Sal Mu~oz
Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Ords 93-15
STATE OF CAI-rFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 93-15 was.duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the 10th day of August, 1993, and that thereafter, said Ordinance
was duly adopted and passed a rcgular meeting of the City Council on the 24th day of August,
1993, by the following roll call vote:
CO~CILMEMB~:
NOES:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
93-15
ORDINANCE NO. 93-16
AN ORDINANCE OF THE C1TY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY
OF TEMECULA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING
MAP OF THE CITY FOR THE CHANGE OF ZONE
APPLICATION CONTAINED IN CHANGE OF ZONE NO.
21, CHANGING THE ZONE FROM R-R (RURAL
RESIDENTIAL) TO R-~ (GENERAL RESIDENTIAL) ON
PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF PAUBA ROAD, SOUTH
OF RANCHO VISTA ROAD AND EAST OF THE
TEMECULA VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 946070-008.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TF2VIF. CU~ DOES I~ERERy ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Public hearings have been held before the Planning Commission and City
Council of the City of Temecula, State of California, pursuant to the Planning and Zoning law
of the State of California, and the City Code of the City of Temecula. The zoning district as
shown on the attached exhibit is hereby approved and ratified as part of the Official Zoning Map
for the City of Temecula as adopted by the City and as may be amended hereafter from rime to
time by the City Council of the City of Temecula, and the City of Temecula Official Zoning
Map is amended by placing in effect the zone or zones as described in Change of Zone No. 21
and in the above rifle, and as shown on zoning map attached hereto and incorporated herein.
Section 2. Norice of Adoption. Within 10 days after the adoption hereof, the City Clerk
of the City of Temecula shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be posted
in at least three public places in the City.
Section 3. Taking Effect. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its
adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of August, 1993.
ATTEST:
J. Sal Mufioz
Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Ords 93-16
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 93-16 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the 10th day of August, 1993, and that thereafter, said Ordinance
was duly adopted and passed a regular meeting of the City Council on the 24th day of August,
1993 by the following wll call vote:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
NOES:
CO~CIL~ERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Ords 93-16
ITEM NO. 13
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning~~'J~
August 24, 1993
Status Report on the Detailed Implementation Strategy and Regional Air Quality
Programs
PREPARED BY:
David W. Hogan, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
Review the attached material and direct Staff to prepare specific
implementation programs for the Council's consideration
PURPOSE:
The purposes of this Agenda Report are to inform the Council about the status of regional air
quality programs, to discuss the City's role in the process, and to get the Council's guidance
and direction on which trip reduction methods the City should use.
BACKGROUND:
The South Coast Air Basin has some of the worst air quality in the country and has been
designated a nonattainment area for Ozone, Nitrous Oxides, Carbon Monoxide and Particulate
Matter. Because of the poor regional air quality, the South Coast Air Quality Management
District (District) has been required by both the Federal and State Clean Air Acts to prepare
an biennial air quality management plans since the 1970's. The next Air Quality Management
Plan is currently being prepared by the District.
The current Air Quality Management Plan (Plan) resulted in trip reduction targets and also
contained a number of control measures which local governments were expected to
implement. In response to this requirement, WRCOG developed a subregional or areawide
approach to air quality implementation. This approach was endorsed by the District and
eventually approved by the City Council on November 24, 1992.
DISCUSSION:
Subreaional APPrOach
At this time the City is in the process of participating with WRCOG and its' member agencies
in the implementation of the Subregional Air Quality Program. The City Council approved a
resolution supporting WRCOG's Subregional Air Quality Program on November 24, 1992. The
program identified a number of activities which the City would support and participate in. The
table below summarizes the status of the City's implementation efforts.
AIRQ~b. IRQUAL2 .CC
STATUS OF SUBREGIONAL APPROACH IMPLEMENTATION
IMPLEMENTATION ACTIONS
Adopt a resolution supporting WRCOG's
Subregional Approach.
STATUS
Completed; the City Council
approved a Resolution on
November 24, 1992.
Adopt a Transportation Demand
Management Ordinance to meet the
requirements of the Congestion
Management Program and the Air Quality
Management Plan.
Promote voluntary programs to meet the
goals of the air quality and congestion
management programs.
Completed; the City Council
adopted an Ordinance on
January 28, 1993.
The City is currently exceeding
this requirement by including an
Air Quality Element in the
General Plan.
Agree to participate in the development of
future area and subregional air quality
action plans (Detailed Implementation
Strategies) to meet trip reduction targets..
Develop trip reduction programs for City
employees.
Agree to provide information to WRCOG to
document local implementation measures.
This activity is ongoing and is a
primary focus of this Agenda
Report.
City Staff is currently reviewing
how other firms and agencies
operate their' own trip reduction
programs.
City Staff is cooperating with
WRCOG to document our air
quality activities.
The schedule prepared by the District envisions that cities will notify them about the measures
they intend to adopt by June 30, 1993 and adopt the strategies, programs, measures, and
ordinances by the end of 1993.
Trip Reduction TarQetS
One of the requirements of the Plan is to begin to reduce the number and length of vehicle
trips within the region by 2010. This has resulted in trip reduction targets for 1994, 1997,
2000, and 2010. The four countywide trip reduction targets which resulted were based upon
a combination of the number of jobs and the number of housing units.
The District then encouraged the subregional agencies such as WRCOG to further breakdown
the targets and assign specific trip reduction targets to individual cities· However, the cities
in Western Riverside County decided not to assign trip reduction targets to individual cities
and to work as a region to reduce the trips that could be reduced. This means that the
WRCOG area will either succeed or partially succeed as a whole at meeting its' trip reduction
target. The 1994 trip reduction target for the WRCOG area is 31,417 vehicle trips per day.
WRCOG will provide the District with a estimate of the total number of vehicle trips being
reduced by the measures the WRCOG members have agreed to implement.
AIRQ~adRQUAL2. CC 2
If a local government fails to participate in the regional trip reduction effort (or if a subregion
fails to meet its' trip reduction targets) the Air Quality Management District could invoke a
"backstop rule" to implement additional transportation control programs to achieve the target.
The District is currently working on a draft of the Backstop Rule. It is expected that a draft
of the rule will be available for public review and comment later this fall.
Area Plannine Districts
To implement this regional approach, WRCOG has established six Area Planning Districts
(APD's) which cover the WRCOG area. Each District represents a contiguous area with similar
opportunities and constraints. Temecula is in the Southwest Planning District which includes
the Cities of Canyon Lake, Lake Elsinore, and Murrieta, as well as adjacent unincorporated
communities of Wildomar, Sun City and Menifee. The City of Temecula is cooperating with
the other Southwest APD agencies to address the Temecula Valleys' particular needs.
The initial preferred trip reduction methods have been consolidated in meetings with the Staff
of the Cities within the Southwest District, the County, and WRCOG. The preliminary trip
reduction methods for all the Area Planning Districts are shown in Attachment No. 1. A
supplemental description of potentially feasible transportation control measures and the type
of vehicle trips they are most effective at reducing is included here in Attachment No 2. This
list is similar to the list which was provided to the City Council at its' March 23, 1993,
meeting. Many of these measures will only be effective at reducing vehicle trips in Temecula
over the long term.
Included in Attachment 2 is a description of the type of vehicle trips that each measure is
intended to address. The types of vehicle trips have been categorized into three groups:
commute, non-commute, and non-work. Commute trips, which represent 31% of all trips
regionwide, are the vehicle trips between the home and the work place. Non-commute work
trips, represent 8% of all trips, consist of work related trips which occur during the work day.
Non-work trips, representing 61% of all vehicle trips, include a wide range of personal trips,
such as going to the store, running errands, or transporting family members.
Detailed Implementation Strateev
The Detailed Implementation Strategies (DIS) contains the activities and measures that local
governments will implement to achieve the trip reduction targets mandated by the District.
The DIS and Action Plan will identify those measures to be implemented within each APD,
This Detailed Implementation Strategy for the Southwest Area Planning District is included in
Attachment No. 3.
FUTURE ACTIVITIES:
In the next six months, City Staff will begin preparing a number of implementation programs
and ordinances to implement these transportation control measures and the Air Quality
Element of the General Plan. Where appropriate, some these items will eventually be
incorporated into the City's Development Code.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
~__ The costs of implementing these programs are unknown at this time.
AIRQ~AIRQUAL2. CC 3
ATTACHMENTS:
1. List of Trip Reduction Methods by Area Planning District and Local Government - Page 5
2. Summary of Trip Reduction Methods - Page 7
3. Draft Detailed Implementation Strategy for Southwest Area Planning District - Page 13
AIRQ~AIRQUAL.2.CC 4
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
LIST OF TRIP REDUCTION METHODS
BY AREA PLANNING DISTRICT
AIRQ~a~IRQUAI,2. CC 5
PREFERRED
METHOD
Increlse Alternate
Transportation
Mode Options
Ibuses. ra~)
ShutlJes
Bicycle and
Pedestrian
Education and
Informat;onlPtomo-
riohal Activities
Economic
DevelopmentJLocal
Jobs Creation
Rideshating Plans
For Employers Wilh
Between 50 and 99
employees
Non-Employer
Based Rideshare
Matching
Alternate Mode
Support Facilities
Work At Hoane
TalecOmmuting
Mixed U~
Encouroge Biking
~nd Walking
,and Use
~tenslfication
{elated To Transit
Rail Stations
~;sting
*evelopment
eliled To New
-ommuter RaT
,n Sile Chad Care
~c~hies (For Larger
,*duced Parking
'-hicles [Golf
liuling Vehicles
WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT AIR QUALITY PROGRAM
PREFERRED TRIP REDUCTION METHODS
June,, 1_993
Southwest Area
Canyon ~ Lake Muttilia
Lake Elsinore
X X X
Temecula
X
Northwest Area ~ Pass Area Central Area
Corona Norco River* Banning ~ Eeaumont Callmesa Moreno 4 Perris
side Valley
X X X X X
X X X
X X X X X
San Jacinto
Valley Area
Jlcinlo
X X
X X
X X
X
X
'X
X
X
X
X
X X X X X 'X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X J X
X X X
X X
X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X X X X
X X X
X X
X X X
X X
side
Co.
X
X
DRAFT
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
SUMMARY OF TRIP REDUCTION METHODS
AIRCI'~AIRQUAI_2.CC 7
0 ~u m m · ·
Z OD
E~ ~E~ eE~
o h~ E ~ E~ E ~ E
d; ~ E~ ~ E E~ Ell
ooo o ooo ooo
zu ~ ~zz uzz ~ZZ ~ZZ
o
'r
Z
0
L)
c
o "
0 e,- 0
E~; · .-
o "'E
C~) U') I~l)
., c ~ >,~. '0.9'~
C j~, r- g 0
_ u~ iE uE~:
o
.,1:
f-
o
o
I::: o
0
z
..C:
>.
0
C:
(D
>
..C
r"
0
0
O
'~,
r- o
I- o
Z
I-- 0 · m'o
= .= --a -' -
Z c c :D.c_
-- o'} O.~e"' "O'-
I- c c '~ c m
- · E · · xm.G
0
0
.~,_
(J
c.)
0
O
c.)
~3
· - ~
r-- D
o
Z
- o
~ ~ ~ x2~ *;o= ' = S
Z:o,c:
c w
=w~E,,o ®'S_uw
· m E >'~
'a:E
n '~ o lui. So
m~ E E E
>~ o o
~ Eu~ Eu~ E E~ E~
OOO O0 0
~ UZZ UZZ ~ OZ UZZ
LU
0
I:
Z
0
rJ
0
o
C
o
0
c~
.,--
L
0
~tu E
"'it: w ,, w
t-e, Eo~
~: EEE EZ--E
O0 000
I-- (3ZZ UZZ
cc .wA '-
<( "o' "
LU ~ .___
~ o w"°.*:'- m +~ w
0
,,, ~.~ ~g ~. ® u,,
~ ~0
C3 0 ~C
( 'F'E "'
o E
I-- ~m o
z ~'5 E w
D E=
o
0
.~-
.-
.. %
0
:,
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
DRAFT DETAILED IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
FOR SOUTHWEST AREA PLANNING DISTRICT
SO~ST AREA PLANNING DISTRICT
The Southwest APD includes the Cities of Canyon Lake, Lake Elsinore, Murrieta, Temecula,
and County unincorporated areas, including Sun City/Menifee and Wildomar.
EXISTING ALTERNATE MODE TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS
Temecula has one localized bus route. Sun City/Menifee has one localized weekday bus route
during work/commute hours, and has a through route to Riverside, Hemet, and Perris. Lake
Elsinore has two localized bus routes that operate Monday-through Saturday. Lake Elsinore also
is served by a through route to Pen'is and Riverside. Dial-a-ride services are provided in Sun
City, Murrieta and Lake Elsinore.. RTA is presently evaluating the provision of Dial-a-ride
service to Canyon Lake on a limited basis for the 1994 fiscal year.
There is one Park and Ride Facility located in Lake Elsinore and one in Temecula.
PREVIOUS ACTIONS/EXISTING INFORMATION
RTA has been and continues to work with communities to determine transit needs.
Temecula, Murrieta and Lake Elsinore have a significant number of large specific plans within
their borders. Many of these plans have provisions that will support trip reductions. These
plans will be evaluated for possible trip reducing benefits.
Both Murrieta and Temecula are in the process of completing bikeway master plans. Lake
Elsinore has a Bikeway Master Plan, and Canyon Lake already has an extensive system of Bike
Lanes.
Both Murrieta and Temecula have included Air Quality Elements in their draft General Plans,
in support of the implementation of trip reducing measures.
Murrieta will be providing a park & ride/transit node as part of their future regional shopping
mall. The mall will also be required to form a Transportation Management Agency as a
condition of project approval.
All jurisdictions in this APD have adopted TDM ordinances i~or employers with more than 100
employees.
6
MOST PROMISING MEASURES
Increase Alternate Transportation Mode Options
The Southwest Area Planning District presently has limited alternatives to automobile travel.
Increasing alternate mode facilities such as bus service or the extension of rail will grea~y
enhance the opportunities for trip reduction. Bus service is not provided on Sundays, and in
some cases it is not provided on Saturdays. No through routes are provided to Murrieta and
Temecula, and there are no route links to North San Diego County. The nearest future
commuter rail stations will be located in Romoland and Perris..RTA has indicated that the
demographics of this area, supported by survey responses, indicate Significant demand for local
rather than commuter service.
Measures that will be evaluated for potential implementation are include:
Feeder Bus shuttle links to future rail stations.
Local private or public transit service with very frequent headways between specific
activity centers (e.g. residential concentrations, employment areas, retail areas etc.).
Presently RTA provides "tripper" service to specific destinations, mainly work sites and
schools for known start and finish times. Similarly, increases in service could be
provided at specific times of day, such as lunch time or during rush hours, and/or
between specific locations such as a park and ride and an employment center.
· Addition bus routes - potentially including service to North San Diego County areas.
Increasing the frequency of stops for existing routes, and/or extension of bus operating
Hours and/or Days. Also consider inclusion of special event/destination oriented, routes.
(e.g. Sea Wor!d, Disneyland, major sporting events, etc.)
· Route connections between Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake.
The items above represent a preliminary list. WRCOG staff will be working with RCTC and
RTA to determine what it would take in terms of cost to provide the expansions listed, and
whether they are feasible.
Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements
This measure would involve the identification of planned facilities, and extension of bike lanes
and routes, largely through developer exactions. Requirements for new development to provide
supporting facilities for bicycle use such as bike racks, shower facilities, and bicycle parking
provisions will also be evaluated.
-----Emphasis on providing sidewalks and on-site pedestrian linkages to and between activity areas
~i.e. retail and service commercial, employment areas, recreation ares, transit stops/stations etc.)
will also be considered as potential measures.
Ridesharing Plans For Employers With Between 50 and 99 employees.
Ridesharing' Plans are intended for employers to provide incentives and information to employees
to encourage them to fideshare or use an alternate transportation mode. The range of between
50 and 99 employees is utilized because employers of ,100+ employees are governed by
Regulation 15, and it becomes more difficult from a practical standpoint to implement rideshare
programs for employers with less that 50 employees. Specific measures and requirements that
would be included for rideshare plans, and provisions for administration and monitoring, will
need to be further defined if this measure is implemented. Types of measures that may be
considered for both existing and new development include but are not limited to:
· Rideshare Matching
· New Employee Orientation
· Rideshare Marketing
-- · Van Pooling
Rideshare incentives such as parking cashout, transit passes, and other incentives and
subsidies
Within the Southwest APD both Murrieta and Temecula expressed interest in exploring the
possibility of establishing a Rideshare Program for employers with between 50 and 99
employees.
8
Alternate Mode Support Facilit.ies
Support Facilities are physical improvements that can be implemented to encourage the use of
motorized alternatives to the single occupancy vehicle such as ridesharing, rail, buses, shuttles,
etc. Such facilities may include but are not limited to:
· Preferential Rideshare and Van pool parking;
· Passenger loading area;
· On site and off-site park and ride facilities;
· Transit improvements (e.g. bus pullouts, pads, and shelters)
Shuttles
The purpose of shuttles is to transport persons, usually for relatively short distances, between
a limited number of activity areas. Such areas include employment areas, housing areas,
shopping areas, entertainment and recreation areas, park and rides, and bus and train stops.
Shuttle service, as described here, would be characterized as having very frequents stops
between a limited number of destinations. For example, a lunch time shuttle may only make
stops between an employment center or a large employer, and an area of the city with a high
concentration of restaurants or retail facilities.
In order to justify the frequent service that would be provided by a shuttle service there must
be a high concentration of uses and activities at nodes being served. For the Southwest APD
such shuttles may be considered as a long range option, as the area develops and the
concentration of uses needed to sustain shuttles occurs. An example of a comparable type of
service would be the planned Downtown Riverside Trolley (see text under Northwest Area
Planning District).
Education and Information/Promotional Activities
This measure would be intended to make information available about alternate transportation
mode opportunities, and to promote the voluntary utilization of ridesharing, bus use, rail use,
bicycling, etc. Under this measure local governments would become active participants in
promotional and information activities.
These activities would be designed to enhance and augment the already considerable efforts of
RCTC and RTA in this area.
Working closely with these two agencies and the private sector, such methods as utility bill
~" 'tuffers, theme fairs, contests, and computerized bulletin boards which provide relevant
information on alternate transportation modes could be considered as possible methods initiated
by local governments. Many such methods could be applied at the subregional level.
Mixed Use/Land Use Design To Encourage Biking and Walking
Mixed use and other specified land use design features may result in land use configurations that
lessen the need for motorized travel by facilitating walking, biking, including the provision of
a "pedestrian friendly" environment. Such approaches could include, among others;
Design features intended to support a pedestrian scale of development;
· Provision of Pedestrian and Bike linkages/paths;
· Supportive retail and service commercial and other amenities, including transit and rail
stops, accessible and close to residents;
· Mixed uses, including residential and non-residential uses in the same building;
Temecula is considering a "villages concept" for much of their yet-to-be-developed territory as
a component of their General Plan. The villages concept will include many of the features listed
~ bore, and will support trip reduction by facilitating non-motorized trips.
On-Site Child Care facilities
This measure is intended to reduce vehicle trips for the purpose of child care by locating the
child care facility at or near the parents' work site.
On-site child care facilities will be considered by Murrieta and Temecula for larger employment
facilities.
Telecommuting/Work At Home
Telecommuting/Work At Home measures are designed to reduce work trips by encouraging
persons to work at or near their homes. Often this may involve the use of computers, moderns
and other electronic aids to link the employee to the work place. However, any activity that
involves working out of the home falls under this measure.
10
ITEM NO.
14
CITY OF TEMECULA
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dave Dixon
FROM: Ron Roberrs
DATE: August 11, 1993
SUBJECT: Dial-a-Ride
In a discussion today with Kevin Walsh I was informed that the City of Murrieta's
Dial-a-Ride Van Program for elderly and disabled was eliminated by their City
Council last night due to budget shortfalls. This will affect some of our citizens as
they utilize the Dial-a-Ride service. I would like this placed on the City Council's
August 24 agenda for discussion.
Whether we take over Murrieta's service or use our own, we must act fast so
there is a minimum of inconvenience to our disabled and elderly citizens.
RHR:ss
ITEM NO.
15
APPROVAT.
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
August 24, 1993
Speed Undulations
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council consider the adoption
of a policy governing the installation of speed undulations in residential neighborhoods in
Temecula.
BACKGROUND:
At the regular City Council meeting of April 13, 1993, the Council reviewed the Commission's
proposed policy on the installation of speed undulations and requested that the policy be
returned to the Commission for consideration of an additional section that addresses a
financial mechanism that will enable the City to recover the costs associated with the
installation of an undulation.
The Commission subsequently reviewed and discussed several financial tools such as
Assessment Districts, Community Service District Service Levels, Maintenance Agreements,
etc. that could be used to recover the installation cost of the undulations. The Commission
determined that the residents requesting the installation of speed undulation should be treated
in the same manner as those requesting stop signs, traffic signals, no parking zones, etc. and
not be charged for the installation. As the typical speed undulation will be used to reduce
vehicle speeds and deter "short cut" traffic through neighborhoods, the Commission felt that
it would be inappropriate to charge the residents requesting help, and very difficult to charge
those individuals causing the problem.
The Commission unanimously voted to add the following sections to the speed undulation
policy and recommend approval to the Council. The Commission also modified the section
requiring the petitions for installation and removal of the undulations to be signed by 75% of
the residents in favor of removal or relocation instead of the 60% proposed.
-, -1- pw15\agdrpt\93%O824\spdul.824
Relocation of Undulations
Changing the location of undulations on e street, or the removal of undulations, may be
considered when all the findings listed below are made by the Commission:
1. Undulations are ineffective in reducing speeds end volumes of vehicles.
2. Undulations were placed in location conflicting with adopted guidelines.
3. There is evidence that the original location is no longer in the best interests of the
community.
4. There is a petition with 75% of residents signature in favor of relocetion.
Removal of Undulations
1. Undulations are ineffective in reducing speeds and volumes of vehicles.
2. Undulations were placed in location conflicting with adopted guidelines.
3. There is evidence that the original location is no longer in the best interests of the
community.
4. There is a petition with 75% of residents in favor of removal.
5. Undulations have been installed for at least two (2) years.
Removal of undulations which have been installed for less than two (2) years will only be
considered if the City is compensated by those requesting removal for the full cost of the
original installation, including design, construction and inspection.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Each undulation construction cost -- $1,500.00
Each undulation yearly maintenance cost -- $ 300.00
The construction and maintenance would be budgeted within the Public Works Street
Department's Street Maintenance account.
Attachments
Speed Undulation Policy
Public/Traffic Safety Commission Staff Report, April 22, 1993
Minutes of April 22, 1993 Public/Traffic Safety Commission
Council Report of April 13, 1993
-2- pwl 5%egdrpt%93%O824\slxlul.824
SPEED UNDULATION POLICY
Prior to the construction of a speed undulation, the subject street section shall meet the following
criteria:
1. A "speed undulation petition' signed by at least seventy five percent (75%) of the affected
residents shall be filed with the City of Temecula Department of Public Works, Traffic
Engineering Division.
2. The average traffic shall range between 1,200 - 2,500 vehicles in a twenty-four (24) hour
period.
3. The speed limit shall be no greater than twenty-five (25) mph as determined by State law.
4. At least sixty percent (60%) of the surveyed vehicles are exceeding the twenty-five (25) mph
speed limit.
5. The subject street:
a. Shall not be over forty (40) feet wide, unless approved by City Engineer.
b. Shall not be more than two (2) traffic lanes.
c. Shall not have a grade greater than five percent (5%) in the section where humps are
to be constructed.
d. Shall be at least one quarter (~) mile in length.
e. Shall not have severe vertical or horizontal alignment features.
f. Shall not be a truck route or transit route.
g. Shall not be an important access route for emergency vehicles.
h. Shall not be listed on the City Circulation Plan, unless approved by City Engineer.
6. The distance between undulations shall range between 200 - 250 feet.
7. Undulations shall not normally be constructed in isolated blocks along a continuous street or
on a relatively short (<800') cul-de-sac.
8. Undulations shall be constructed per the City of Temecula Standard Drawings.
9. Undulations are still experimental roadway features; therefore, additions, alternations or
removal of any hump may occur at any time.
pwl 5%treffic%spedhump.cri fad 082493
10.
11.
Relocation of Undulations
Changing the location of undulations on a street, or the removal of undulations, may be
considered when all the findings listed below are made by the Commission:
1. Undulations are ineffective in reducing speeds and volumes of vehicles.
2. Undulations were placed in a location conflicting with adopted guidelines.
3. There is evidence that the original location is no longer in the best interests of The
community.
4. There is a petition with 75% of residents signature in favor of relocation.
Removal of Undulations
1. Undulations are ineffective in reducing sl~eeds and volumes of vehicles.
2. Undulations were placed in a location conflicting with adopted guidelines.
3. There is no evidence that the original location is no longer in the best interest of the
community.
4. There is a petition with 75% of residents in favor of removal.
5. Undulations have been installed for at least two (2) years.
Removal of undulations which have been installed for less than two |2) years will only be
considered if the City is compensated by those re~luesting removal for the full cost of the
original installation, including design, construction and inspection.
pwl 5\traffic%spedhump.cri faul 082493
12" REFLECTIVE WHITE
STRIPES @ 6' O:C, -,~
//
· I"
,,.,=-,:,
W6(15)
INSTALL SIGN AND POST
CONSTRUCT 12'
12' . SP DU.LA 0
--~ 1' TAPER (TYP) q
I I ~ i' { ..,,,l
, i I
~' ... '~BL B
TYP
~ W37AR
W6(15l
ILl ,,,,,,,,
~t'..~llll-II
SECTION 'B-B'
FACE
2' MAX TAPER'
"""~l (WIDTH 12'J/
· VARIES)
'it '
· ;.;.'~.. ~
SECTION 'A-A'
A.C. STANDARD 3/8" MIX
TACK COAT
REFLECTIVE WHITE
PAVEMENT MARKING-~.- D
DETAIL
INSTALLATION DETAILS:
1. SPEED UNDULATIONS SHALL NOT BE PLACED OVER
MANHOLES, WATERGATES, JUNCTION CHAMBERS, ETC.
2. EDGE OF SPEED UNDULATIONS SHALL BE 5 FE~Er
MINIMUM FROM EDGE OF DRIVEWAY.
3. WHENEVER POSSIBLE SPEED UNDULATIONS SHALL
BE PLACED AT PROPERTY' UNES INSTEAD OF MID-LOT,
4. WHENEVER POSSIBLE SPEED UNDULATIONS SHALL
BE'PLACED ADJACENT TO STREET UGHTS.
S. LOCATION OF SPEED UNDULATIONS TO BE DETERMINED
BY CRY ENGINEER.
WARNING FLAGS
(FIRST WEEk)
/ .
/~30" X 30" W37R '
WARNING SIGN
BIJ, CK ON YELLOW
6" SERIES °E' LETTERS
W6(15) SIGN -.
W6(15) SIGN
SIGN LOCATIONS: AS
DIRECTED BY CITY ENGINEER .
REVISIONS
DATE
INIT.
DATE
APPROVED
CITY O~:'TEMECULA
STANDARD 2"
SPEED UNDULATION
STANDARD NO.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
AGENDA REPORT
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
· ~ Tim D. Sedet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
April 22, 1993
Item 10
Speed Undulations
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission consider expanding the proposed speed undulation policy to include a
financing mechanism that will enable the City to recover the cost associated with the
installation, annual maintenance, and possible removal of an undulation.
BACKGROUND:
At the regular City Council meeting of April 13, 1993, the Council reviewed the Commission's
proposed policy on the installation of speed undulations and requested that the policy be
returned to the Commission for consideration of an additional section that addresses a
financial mechanism that will enable the City to recover the costs associated with the
installation of an undulation.
There are several financial tools available such as assessment districts, community service
district service levels, maintenance agreements, etc., that can be used to recover the
construction cost of the undulations. However, the determination of who should be assessed
or charged is more complex. The typical speed undulation will be used to reduce vehicle
speeds and deter "short-cut" traffic through neighborhoods. Should the cost of the undulation
be borne by those causing the problem or by those requesting help? The most appropriate
solution may involve a case-by-case review to determine the type of traffic (neighborhood or
cut-through) causing the problem, and then determine the financial mechanism.
The following policy only considers the costs associated with the removal/relocation of the
undulations.
Relocation of Undulations
Changing the location of undulations on. a street, or the removal of undulations, may be -'
considered when all the findings listed below are made by the Commission:
1. Undulations are ineffective in reducing speeds and volumes of vehicles.
2. Undulations were placed in a location conflicting with adopted guidelines.
-1- pwOl~treffie~bowwnimsn~egenda~93~0422 0415e
There is evidence that the original location is no longer in the best interests of the
community.
There is a petition with 60% of residents signature in favor of relocation,
Removal of Undulations
Undulations are ineffective in reducing speeds and volumes of vehicles.
Undulations were placed in a location conflicting with adopted guidelines.
There is no evidence that the original location is no longer in the best interest of the
community.
There is a petition with 60% of residents in favor of relocation or removal.
Undulations have been installed for at least two (2) years.
Removal of undulations which have been installed for less than two years will only be
considered if the City is compensated by those requesting removal for the full cost of the
original installation, including design, construction and inspection.
The maintenance of the undulations could be financed as is done with all other signs, striping
and pavement features.
-2°
'pwO1~,treffic~eornmiesn~gende~93~0422 0415e
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION APRIL 2:>. 1993
Greg Treadwell, 26363 Irwin Court, Hemst, addressed the Commission stating his
concern that the request was generated to get his personal vehicle off the street. Mr.
Treadwell stated that he keeps his truck parked in front of his business to keep the
semi-trucks from perking there and suggested painted red curb in increments to allow
for smaller vehicles to park and keep the semi-trucks out. Mr. Treadwell concluded by
suggesting that if the Commission could work with him, he could possibly work with
the City in perking his truck within the shopping center.
Ben Dobbins advised that at the previous public hearing, no business owners came
forward to express their sul~port or ol~lDosition of the limited parking/no parking zones.
It was moved by Commissioner Perry, seconded by Chairman Guerriero to continue the
discussion of this item to allow staff to notify all affected business and property
owners and bring the item back to the Commission.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 1
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
Johnson, Knopp, Perry, Sander, Guerriero
None
Holliday
Speed Undulations
Traffic Engineer Ben Dobbins presented the staff report advising the Commission that
the City Council sent the item back to the Commission to consider including a
financing mechanism that will enable the City to recover costs associated with
installation, annual maintenance and Possible removal of an undulation.
Commissioner Perry stated that he feels the 'City does not charge for other traffic
control devices, however he would agree that if residents who requested the speed
undulation subsequently requested removal, they should be asked to pay for the
removal.
Chairman Guerriero asked that staff place the Neighborhood Traffic Program on the
nex~ agenda.
It was moved by Commissioner Perry, seconded by Commissioner Johnson to accept
the proposed speed undulation policy with the following revisions:item No. 4,
Relocation of Undulations and Item No. 4, Removal of Undulations amended to require
75% acceptance from residents and a fee to be charged for removal only, if requested'
by the property owners.
PTSCOMMIN4122193
4126/~3
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
8. No Parkina Zone on Rancho California Road ~ Via Las Colinas
APRIL 22.1993
Traffic Engineer Ben Dobbins presented the staff report.
Chairman Guerriero suggested that staff re-evaluate the intersection for additional
traffic control. The Commission expressed a concern that left turns should be
restricted from this intersection.
Director Serlet advised that a signal will be installed at Lindy Lane at a future date,
It was moved by Commissioner Perry, seconded by Chairman Guerriero to recommend
to the City Council a "No Parking Zone" on the south side of Rancho California Road
from the west curb line of Via I. as Coilhas 1 O0 feet westerly.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
Johnson, Knopp, Perry, Sander, Guerriero
None
ABSENT: I COMMISSIONERS: Hoiliday
It was moved by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Sander to
recommend that staff re-evaluate the intersection for a recommendation to improve the
left-hand turning movements from Via Las Colinas onto Rancho California Road and
bring that recommendation back to the Commission.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS:
Johnson, KnOlDI~, Perry, Sander, Guerriero
None
ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Ho!iiday
Two (2) Hour Limited Parkina Zone
Traffic Engineer Ben Dobbins presented the staff report.
Steve Clinton, 27315 Jefferson Avenue, Temecula, representing the tenants of Chico's
Taco's, advised the Commission that when this commercial center was built, there
were no parking restrictions on Jefferson, Mr. Clinton told the Commission that the
center is leasing sDace to another restaurant facility and needs additional parking, He
said the tenants would be agree to two hour parking.
PTSCOMMIN4122193
-5-
4/28,'13
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
The motion carried as follows:
APRIL 22.1993
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT:
Chairman Guerriero declared a recess at 8:25 P.M.
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
Johnson, Knopp, Perry, Sander, Guerriero
None
I 'COMMISSIONERS: Holliday
The meeting reconvened at 8:35 P.M.
Rainbow Creek Drive and SDrinatime Drive
Traffic Engineer Ben Dobbins presented the staff report and advised that staff
conducted volume studies which indicate an additional "STOP" sign is not warranted
for this area.
It was moved by Chairman Guerriero, seconded by Commissioner Sander to deny the
request for an additional "STOP" sign at the intersection of Rainbow Creek and
Springtime Drive, Temecula.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 1
COMMISSIONERS: '
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
Johnson, Knopp, Perry, Sander, Guerriero
None
Holliday
Mercedes Street and 6th Street
Traffic Engineer Ben Dobbins presented the staff report.
It was moved by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Perry to
recommend to the City Council the installation of two "STOP" signs at the intersection
of Mercedes Street and 6th Street.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 1
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
Johnson, Knopp, Perry, Sander, Guerriero
None -.
Holliday
PT$COMMIN4122/13
4128/13
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
4. Kahwea Road - Street Closure
APRIL 22. 1993
Traffic Engineer Ben Dobbins presented the staff report.
Public Works Director Tim Serlet stated that the developer was conditioned to build the
street as part of his tract map approval and if the City chooses not to open the street,
it is anticipated that the developer will ask the City to reimburse the cost of
construction of the street. Director Serlet advised that the request to keep the street
closed is from the Kahwea Road property owners and Calle Medusa residents.
It was moved by Chairman Guerriero, seconded by Commissioner Perry to hold a public
hearing on May 27, 1993 on the closure of Kahwea Road.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: I
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
Johnson, Knopp, Perry, Sander, Guerriero
None
Holliday
Five "Stop" Sion Locations
Traffic Engineer Ben Dobbins presented the staff report.
Terry Davidson, 42355 Maskuaz Court, Temecula, advised the Commission that she
is requesting the "Stop" signs, however she would like "Not A Through Street" sign
placed on the cul-de-sacs along Loma Linda and a three-way stop at Via Consuelo and
Loma Linda.
Director Serlet advised that staff is investigating the complaints received from Ms.
Davidson, and in response to these complaints, staff has determined that "Stop" signs
are warranted at the following locations:
Southbound Maskuaz Court L~ East Loma Linda Road
Southbound Via Consuelo @ Loma Linda Road
Southbound Esplendor Court @ Loma Linda Road
Northbound Esmerado Court @ Loma Linda Road
Westbound East Loma Linda Road @. Loma Linda Road
It was moved by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Knopp that
"Stop" signs be installed as recommended by staff, and that the "Stop" sign at Via
ConSuelo be re-evaluated for a three-way Stop and recommend that a "Not A Through
Street" sign be placed on Maskuaz Court.
FTSCOMMIN4122/93
4126/13
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNE~R~
FINANCE OFFICER'
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
/fp~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
April 13, 1993
Speed Undulations
PREPARED BY:
James "Ben" Dobbins, Traffic Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council consider the adoption
of a policy governing the installation of speed undulations in residential neighborhoods in
Temecula.
BACKGROUND:
The City has received numerous requests for the installation of speed undulations in residential
areas. Speed undulations would be installed to reduce vehicular speeds and deter "short-cut"
routes through residential neighborhoods.
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission has reviewed studies of undulations used within other
jurisdictions and have determined that undulations could serve as a useful tool within the City.
Each location would be reviewed by the Commission and forwarded to the City Council for
final approval. Attached is the proposed Speed Undulation Policy and the Public/Traffic Safety
Commission's Agenda Report.
Typically, a speed 'undulation' is two (2) inches high by twelve (12) feet wide, which differs
from a speed 'bump', usually seen in parking lots, which is over four (4) inches high by one
(1) foot wide.
The Commission, with no opposition from the Police Department or Fire Department,
recommended that the City Council consider the attached Speed Undulation Policy for
adoption.
'- 1 - pw01 ~gdrpt~93~)413~undulete.spd 0401 ·
FISCAL IMPACT:
Each undulation construction cost --
Each undulation. yearly maintenance cost --
$1,500.00
$300.00
Attachment:
1. Proposed Policy
2. Public/Traffic Safety Commission Agenda Report
3. City Attorney Letter Dated 11-28-90
-2- pwO 1 ~gdrpt~31,0413~undu|,,te.spd 0401 ·
SPEED UNDULATION POLICY
Prior to The construction of a speed undulation, the subject street section shall meet the following
criteria:
e
A "speed undulation petition" signed by at least sixty percent {60%) of me affected residents
shall be filed with the City of Temecula Department of Public Works, Traffic Engineering
Division.
The average traffic shall range between 1,200 - 2,500 vehicles in a twenty-four {24) hour
period.
The speed limit shall be no greater than twenty-five (25) mph as determined by State law.
At least Sixty percent (60%) of the surveyed vehicles are exceeding the twenty-five (25) mph
speed limit.
The subject street:
Shall not be over forty (40) feet wide, unless approved by City Engineer.
Shall not be more than Two {2) Traffic lanes.
Ce
Shall not have a grade greater than five percent (5%) in The section where humps are
to be constructed.
d. Shall be at least one quarter (~) mile in length.
Shall not have severe vertical or horizontal alignment features.
Shall not be a truck route or transit route.
g. Shall not be an important access rome for emergency vehicles·
h. Shall not be listed on the City Circulation Plan, unless approved by City Engineer.
The distance between undulations shall range between 200 - 250 feet.
Undulations shall not normally be constructed in isolated blocks along a continuous street or
on a relatively short (< 800') cui-de-sac.
Undulations shall be constructed per the City of Temecula Standard Drawings.
Undulations are still experimental roadway features; therefore, additions, airernst,one or
removal of any hump may occur at any time.
pwOl~treffie%spedhump,cri feul 021193
12" REFLECTIVE WHITE 12'
STRIPES @ 6' O.C. -,~ ~
/' I I
> c
7AR · ,A J I
INSTALL SIGN AND POST
1' TAPER (TYP)-] /r
=B
J200'-250' SPACING
6" TYP
CURB FACE
· ttitttttttt'~
2' MAX TAPER
"~ I (WIDTH 12'
' VARIES)
.;...:.~.. ;.'.~'
2
SECTION 'B-B'
A.C. STANDARD 3/8' MIX
TACK COAT
SECTION 'A-A'
REFLECTIVE WHITE
PAVEMENT MARKING-e-
INSTALLATION DETAILS:
DETAIL
1. SPEED UNDULATIONS SHALL NOT BE PLACED OVER
MANHOLES, WATERGATES, JUNCTION CHAMBERS, ETC.
2. EDGE OF SPEED UNDULATIONS SHALL BE S FEET
MINIMUM FROM EDGE OF DRIVE1VAY.
3. WHENEVER POSSIBLE SPEED UNDULATIONS SHALL
BE PLACED AT PROPERTY UNES INSTEAD OF MID-LOT.
4. WHENEVER POSSIBLE SPEED UNDULATIONS SHALL
BE PLACED ADJACENT TO STREET UGHT$.
5. LOCATION OF SPEED UNDULATIONS TO BE DETERMINED
BY CITY ENGINEER.
t D,CZT. DAT~
I
CONSTRUCT 12'
ASPHALT UNDULATION
150' '1
e, ~- W37AR
W6(15)
WARNING FLAGS
(FIRST WEEK)
30' X 30' W37R
WARNING SIGN
BLACK ON YELLOW
6" SERIES 'E' LETTERS
W6(15) SIGN
6(15) SIGN
SIGN LOCATIONS: AS
DIRECTED BY CITY ENGINEER
CITY OF TEMECULA
STANDARD 2"
SPEED UNDULATION
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
AGENDA REPORT
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
Ben Dobbins, Traffic Engineer
March 25, 1993
Item 6
Speed Undulations'
PREPARED BY:
Jim Faul, Engineering Technician
RECOMMENDATION:
At the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's request, Staff has prepared a report on speed
undulation installation and policies as a traffic control device on public residential streets.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Temecula has received numerous requests for the installation of speed undulations
in residential areas. Speed undulations would be installed to reduce vehicular speeds and
deter "short-cut" routes through residential neighborhoods.
Streets perform two (2) basic transportation functions: Provide access to individual parcels
of land and provide movement between various origins and destinations. Local residential
streets should be protected from excessive speeds (greater than 25 to 30 mph) and from
through traffic. Installing speed undulations, which are carefully designed features in the
pavement surface, is one method devised to accomplish the above objectives.
Many municipalities in California are currently using speed undulations and are listed below:
City of Campbell
City of Santa Rosa
· City of Placentia
City of Brea
City of Paramount
City of Baldwin Park
City of Yorba Linda
City of Poway
City of Upland
City of National City
City of Simi Valley
City of Thousand Oaks
- 1 - pwO 1 ~traffi~:ommissn~ag®nda~93~0325 0315a
City of Claremont City of Berkeley
City of El Monte City of Clovis
City of Redondo Beach City of San Luis Obispo
C~yof Laguna Beach City of Roseville
of Sacramento City of Chico
City of Agoura Hills City of San Jose
CZty of. Manhattan Beach' City of Cupertino
of Santa Monica City of Los Angles
City of Costa Mesa County of Riverside
City of Newport Beach County of Ventura
City of Westminster City of Anaheim
City of Camarilio City of Fullerton
City of San Diego City of Pasadena
City of Corona
On February 23, 1993, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, along with Staff, field inspected
various slc~ed undulations installed in the cities of Pasadena and Corona.
As previously mentioned, the positive effects of using speed undulations are:
Vehicular Speed Reduction
Discouragement of "short-cut' through traffic
While the notable negative effects are:
Can be uncomfortable for those driving over the speed undulations
May divert traffic onto adjacent residential streets
May slow down response time for Fire and Emergency vehicles
Increased noise due to acceleration after speed undulation
Possible proliferation throughout City streets
Possible liabilities
Additional City maintenance cost
Many municipalities shy away from installing speed undulations due to the liability exposure.
The liability issue is raised due to current policy that all official traffic control devices are
regulated by the California Traffic Control Devices Committee through the California
Department of Transportation (CalTrans). Although speed undulations are not specifically
identified aS an official traffic control device I~y CalTrans, they are used to influence or control
the route and speed of vehicles, therefore, they function as a traffic control device and should
be considered as such. While speed undulations are, by their function, a traffic control device,
they have not been approved for use by the California Traffic Control Devices Committee.
-2- pwO1%treffic%commissrt~agende~93~0325 0315a
The City of Pasadena instructed staff that they have not had a liability situation since their
speed undulation program was adopted January 10, 1984.
To prevent the possibility of proliferation of speed undulation installation throughout City
streets, it is important to establish a clear and concise speed undulation policy. Staff
recommends the following policy:
SPEED UNDULATION POLICY
e
Prior to the construction of a speed undulation, the subject street section shall meet the
following criteria:
A "speed undulation petition" signed by at least sixty percent (60%) of the affected
residents shall be filed with the City of Temecula Department of Public Works, Traffic
Engineering Division.
The average traffic shall range between 1,200 - 2,500 vehicles in a twenty-four (24)
hour period.
The speed limit shall be no greater than twenty-five (25) mph as determined by State
law.
At least sixty percent (60%) of the surveyed vehicles are exceeding the twenty-five
(25) mph speed limit.
The subject street:
a. Shall not be over forty (40) feet wide, unless approved by City Engineer.
b. Shall not be more than two (2) traffic lanes.
Ce
Shall not have a grade greater than five percent (5%) in the section where
undulations are to be constructed.
d. Shall be at least one quarter (~) mile in length.
e. Shall not have severe vertical or horizontal alignment features.
f. Shall not be a truck route or transit route.
g. Shall not be an important access route for emergency vehicles.
Shall not be listed on the City Circulation Plan, unless approved by City
Engineer.
The distance between undulations shall range between 200 - 250 feet.
Undulations shall not normally be constructed in isolated blocks along a continuous
street or on a relatively short (< 800') cul-de-saC.
-3- pw01 ~,tref~o~r-,-,~sen~agend,,~,g3M:)325 0315e
Undulations shall be constructed per the City of Temecula Standard Drawing.
Undulations are still experimental roadway features; therefore, additions, alternations
or removal of any undulation may occur at any time.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City of Thousand Oaks reported that the shape, height, and spacing of the speed
undulations were of great importance. In order to maintain an acceptable level of quality
control, a group of templates had to be made to use as a screed. The asphalt concrete had
to be laid in multiple lifts (layers) and a survey crew followed to assure that the desired height
and shape were achieved. Advance signs and pavement markings were then installed and the
speed undulation was striped to increase its visual impact to the driver. A cost estimate for
construction and maintenance of speed undulations follows:
Installation:
Speed Undulation Construction
Signing and Striping
TOTAL
$1,000.00
$500.00
(each) $1,500.00
Maintenance: (yearly)
Asphalt Concrete Pavement
Signing and Striping
TOTAL
CONCLUSION:
$100.00
$200.00
(each) $300.00
Studies have shown that speed unulations have a significant impact on traffic. Humps are
effective in reducing speeds, but the impacts on deterring through traffic vary by location.
Responses from various municipalities indicate that the Fire & Emergency Services is most
effected by the installation of speed undulations. An experimental pilot program could be
installed and evaluated after one (1) year to determine future use of speed undulations.
ATTACHMENTS:
City of Pasadena Policies and Procedures for the installation of speed humps and
standard drawing.
City of Camarillo Resolution No. 85-24 pertaining to procedures governing the.
construction of speed humps.
PwO1%treffic%commissn%agenda~93%0325 0315
POLICIES FOR =~E INSTALLATION OF SFEED EUM~.S
(Amended 11/25/85)
Soeed humus are an a~urcur!ate mechanism. f'cr'reduei~u'soeeds on
_ certain streets in P~sadena when urooer!v installed under %~o rich=
cir--umstances. "'
Soeed humus can be considered for installation when the benefits
nor~...~!lv derived by residents from a local residential s~ree= are
siunificantlv d~m~nished by the speed of traff{c (even thouun there
have been few or no reported accidents) -as evidence 'by a
substantial majority.of the abutt~n$ residents si~n~n~ a Petition
for the installation of speed hu~DS..
sueed humus should only be used on local residential streets (i.e..
streets where the orimarv function is to orovide access to aUu=tin~
residences]· Experience has shown that =he average motorist
.reduces speed to approximately 16 MPH to traverse a 3-inch speed
hump. it would noc be realistic to'expect motorists on streets
intended. to serve more than just abutting residents to reduce
speeUs to 16 MPH every 300 feet or so. Such installations would
inevitably lead to extreme driver frustration and subsnantial
negative public reaction to the concept of using speed humps. for
speed control, even at locations where they are clearly
appropriate. Installation of speed humps on streets other than
local residential streets could have poten=ia!ly severe traffic
safety consequences, almost certainly affect emergency services and
ocher service delivery activities, and likely create the diversion
of large amounts of through traffic onto local residential streets
which were not intended for that purpose.
The majority of street mileage in Pasadena can clearly be
classified as local residential streets. 'However, speed humps will
not normally be considered for streets which are classified as
col!eczor streets or higher in the City's General Plan or which are
determined to provide a transportation service to the community
beyond cna~ of simply providing access to the immediately abutting
residents. There are no.absolute criteria that clearly distin-
~uLsnes a purely local residential 'street from ozher relatively
low-volume szreets =hat provide imporzan= services co residents in
addition zo those immediately abutting the s=reet in question.
However, streets carrying less than 1,000 vehicles per day are
a!mosz always local residential street and streets carrying over
3,000 vehicles per day almos~ always provide important services to
t.~e larger ccmmuniZy. In the final analysis, the suitability of a
parzlcuiar s=ree= for the ins=aliation o~ speed humps will have to
be determined on a.case-by-case basis.
Speed humus should be installed on logical segments of local
residential stree.=s. They will not normally be installed in'
isolated blocks alon~ a continuous street or on re!ativelv shor~c
~!ess than 800 feet] cul-de-sac streets. A substantial majority of
A-1
10.
residents on logical continuous segments of a local residential
screen must suppol-c the ins=al!ation of speed humps. Logical
segments are considered =o be segments between ar*cerial s=ree=s or
be=wean natural discontinuities such as jogs ~n the at=eat. The
cos= of installing speed humps on relatively short cud-de-sac
streets cannot normally be justified.
Streets e!iaib!e for the installation of speed humms shell have a
speed limit of 25 MPH as determined in accordance with State ~aw.
The need to reduce speed substantially a= speed humps would no=
make these. devices appropriate for .streets posted higher than 25
'- MPH because of the'severe'speed'differential such'as ins=alia=ion.
~ould create along the s=reet. Severe differentials between the
speed of vehicles on a street are known to contribute to traffic
accidents.
The street shall'be no more than one lane in each direc~ion.
The street'should not be a =Tuck route or a =ransit route.
The street should not have arades ~reater than 5%. Proposed
policies 5, 6, 7, and 8 are identical to recommendations.
made'by the California Traffic Control devices Committee
on Pavement Undulations and are based on the best
information currently available.
Sueed humus will only be considered 'for installation on local
residen=ial streets determined by the Public works Department to
have adeuua~e vertical and horizontal alignment and sight distances
to safe!v accommodate =he installation of speed humus.
The sz~ee= should not be an important access route-for emergency
venic!es. 'Factors to be considered are:
(a) E'ihether the street is a primary route for emergency vehicles;
Whether the installation' of speed humps could cause a
significant delay in the response to emergencies.
Speed humus are still exmerimenta! roadway featureS'r therefore.
additions. alterations, or removal of any or all speed hUmuS may
occur at 'any time.
~dcpued by Pasadena Board of Directors, January 10, 1984.
~mended by Pasadena Board of Directors, November 12, 1985.
A-2
.-'OR T.~.'Y I~/~TALT.~TTON OF ~.~E='D ~S FY !989-90
(Amended
The Board's adopted policies and procedures for the
installation of speed humps will be made available to all
interested patios,
A representative of' 'a local residential street who
believes the residents-.on his' street will' sup.mot the
installation.' of speed .humps will submit a request in.
writing to the Traffic and Transportation Engineering
Section which will consult with the Police and Fire
Depa,--cments in making a determination of whether the
street in .~uestion is eligible for further consiaeration
for the installation of speed humus (i,e,, the street is
c~nsistent with ~he Board is policfes for the insza!!azicn
of speed humps),
Upon determination that a st=set is not e!igible for
speed humps, the representative(s) of the street will be
notified in writing giving the reason why the surest is
not eligible, The representative(s) of the so=set will
be given 15 days to appeal the decision in writing uo the
Traffic and Transportation Engineer, A remor= of those
streets determined to be ineligible will b~ sent to the
City Manager for distribution to the Board· Staff will
review the original determination of streets which are
appealed. If staff concludes their original decision is
still valid, staff will present the appeal. to the Board
of Directors-for 'final determination if representatives
of the street wish the matter ~o be referred to the
Board.
Upon deter=ination that a street is eligible for fur_her
consideration, the representative of the street will be
advised to submit a petition (forms provided by the City)
· from the abutting proper:,y owners or'residents indicating
t~at a clear majority (63% or more) support the installa-
tion of speed humps on their street, TAd petition forms
provided by the City will state: If there is subse.~uen=ly
a desire by residents to remove the speed humps, the
humps will only be considered for removal after recei~=
of a petition from a substantial majority (65% ormore)
asking for the removal along with sufficient funds for
=he removal up to $700 per hump,
The suchsot of the oe=~tion is recurred to contac-, every
resident of the abuttint mrcmez-c,~es on the subject,
s=ree=. Tf · reside~= is a~a.~ns= the speed humus, the
word "OP.~OS~D- vii! be noted on the petition s~nature
space. If the sponsor is unable to contact a TesSden=.
A-3
"N0 CONTACT." 'wilt be noted on the 6etition'sicna~_,~,_-e
smace with =he days and -~
~.. rues that ccr~=ac= ~as a~e~ed.
I= is re~ red =ha= =he sponsor make 8= ' l~as= ~-wo
a~=em~=s cn semar~=e days ~o con=at'= a resident.
Any meritions submitted mrior to e!i~ibilitv'determ..~-na-
tion bv C~=v staff ~i1~ not be mrocessed ahead of
schedule and shall be sub~ec= to re~ec=ion if all
recuired information on the ~ns=a~!ation of smeed humus
~s no= ~ncluded thereon.
To be 'cOnsidered for the progrim, petitions.'must be
received by the Traffic and Transpor"~ation Engineerinq
Setzion by .
upon verification of the .6etition, staff will make very
reasonable effort to notify ~he surrounding area of the
proposal for speed humps on a paz-,icular st=de=. Such
nozification may include information in Citypublications
(IN FOCUS), and neighborhood newsletters, when available,
and in some ins=antes, special signs posted on the
street. If ~here is substantial opposition to the
ins=alia=ion of speed humps by people who travel the
szree= on a regular basis the Traffic and Transportation
Engineer will consult'with ~e various parties and
attempt to reach consensus. If ageement cannot be'
reached on a particular stareet, the matter will be
referred to the Board of Directors for final
determination.
Upon verification of the petition, the Traffic and
TransporcaV_ion Engineering Section will make traffic
speed and volume measurements and review the traffic
accident history for. the street in question. In
addiZion, the Traffic and Transportation Engineering
Setzion .will submit =he list of requests to the Police
and Fire Depaments for their comments.
'In the event the n-~her 'of requests for speed humps
exceeds the funds available, the Traffic and
Transportation Engineering Set=ion will rank the.requests
in a recommended order of priority and submit these
recommendations to the Board of Directors for approval.
The priority list recommended for approval will be-based
on traffic accidents, speeds, traffic volumes, and
comments of the Police and Fire Dep~en=s. The Traffic
and Transpor--,ation Engineer will set for_h the basis
the recommended p~iorkties in a report, accompanying ~e
priority list.
Unless =here is an uver=_i~ing consideration such as high
incidence of speed-related accidents (at are condition on
most local residential sT_Tee=s), prio=i=ies will normally
be established by multiplying the percentage of motorists
A-4
exceeding 25 MPH by ~he 24-hour =raffic volume cf
szree= in .cueszion. A stares= yielding ~e' highesz
numerical value resulUing from V, heabove. ccmpu=~icn will
be considered =o have =he highes= pricri=y for speed
humps. Depending upon =he number 'of.pe=itions received
and the types of s=reens involved, it is possible ~at a
"cu=-off speed" (perhaps an 85=h percen=ile speed of 30
MPH) will be es=ablished below which s=ree=s will no= be
considered for =he program.
· The physical installation of speed' hUmps and the
associaned ==affic cony, To1 devices shall conform to
design standards es=ablished by the Public Works and
Transporca=ion Depar=ment.
Adc.uzed by Pasadena Board of Directions, January 10, 1984.
.~_~ended by Pasadena Board of Direc-,ors, March 30, !987.
Amended by Pasadena Board of Direc=ors, February 14, 1989.
A-5
n~Foue FugueaLl ~OF C~ co~c~Zon o~ e~ed hops ~n
ree~enCta~ areael a~
Genl:s~ ~lan w~Lch con~ns a Ctr~lsg~o~ ~mng del~gnld
pcOb~lm o~ excessive VIALGU~Sr ~rlf~Lc ~o Fel~dlnC/~ aresel
2ocml :elldents lad which dignitY&Co ~he poclncLl~ ~a~
selective IDled ~IdUeC~OOI
OF THE C::T¥ OF CANAX.TLLO Ai FOLLOWSt
The LnLt~o~Lon o~ rugamoco {oc IDled hump construe-'
(&) AI~ requuota shs~ o~LgLnsta from the reaLdents
the IT. Feet,
lu:~ec~ 8~ceo~, CoDLea o~ ua~d DecCOLon IALI~ be ·UDp.~Led
Dy cam ~-ng',neerLh; SIFVLGIO ~epartmlnt.
(c) ~1; pltLC~cnl ohe~l be cLrc~s~od by tat
(d) A sopsrate pe<Lon Iha~l be ueod ~or esch
(e) Petit/ohm aha~ be cizcu~atud a~ a sialmum
among chose residence r/tiding In ~,uildLr~;a {icing the
ocree~ and located wAr. hen ?S tmmt of ~he ~aoe o~ curd on the
(~) C~p~eCmd petitions Ihal~ be delivered
Camirlllo, C&IL~OCnLI 93010,
t,~o e: o£ reaLdense representing at Zoost siXty ':.
peru: ~ the residences {excXudLn~ churches and
&per t face direcg~y on the ecFeet end whXch are
~ocated ~ 75 toil o~ =he =grb on t~ elFmat, -.
(h).Zn ~be event ~hat s portion of the sffoe~ed
earlet is ~ronze~ by &partmet ImL~dinOs and/or o~urehel,
the owners, managers and/o~ ~enB~C, st sm my sum~
· negative "Pe~tion of ITemseta to the DIEe~tor
Zng~neering Isrv~ele requesting ~sZ speed humps no~
~nscsZ~ed on tAA~ street,
with ~roceduFee |s) throug~ (f),-&Uove,.
{43i) st the spiresant un~ge Gent&lead ~n bmL~dihg= ~oostod
(3) The Doperant oZ EnOinesrin~ Services
notices so eseh such building &dyesing of
Section' ~, Marrifts,
~he coneerection of speed humps on public roads
aha~ ~e considered On~y l~ &l~ the lo~ovSng conditions
the Director st IngLneer~ne Services
vehicles i~ i 24 ho~r
(b) Mere than eiVh~y-eeven percent (871)
the surveyed meterilia exceed a speed OZ 2S
(c) The road is nOC over 40 flit in
{d} The road has a speed ~istit of 25 m.p.h.
in accordance with State ~av or City Counci~ action.
is) The road hal AS storm than ~vo traffic
(~} The .rosd &s s~Cher · rsstde~ttsl road or
a ZOCA~ road ss de~*-ned in ths GenorlZ YZen
(0) The Approach speeds st the ~oos~ion o~
~irst po~lntt&~ speed harp meet ~I ~e ~o ~e s~lctive~y
contrc~e~ vXI m phyaical design ~wst~re tO the Iltil~SCCiOlt
the Detector o~ Sng~neerin; Services.
Section 3. Procedures,
Aziep~ion O~ a requmat for epeld hap oonstructLonm
shall De th motormen with the. goX~i.ng proemSurest
(s) Altar each ~tition is received, the Dtrmotor
(%) verify thac each petition contains-the
toquealOe number o~ signatures.
· (3) Verify cmpltanoe vtth aXX warrants
spaci.~Jed in SactXon ] of this ItesoXution,
Dep&rcmen~ ~o s~hedu~o selective I~td e~Je~o~nt on
eacA I~elC,
{d) Prior to the City CaUsal1 hearir~, khe City
Clerk shill prepare s noOSes of said he&ring inviting All
interested individuals to appe&r &rid cn~sr into re,event
cussions, These ~ocicoe lltll~ be mailed to l~lhomea a~oag
ICrettl~ and a specii~ paid edvert~aeme~ eha~ be ;~loed
newsplpec of generl~ circulation,
SectLo~ ~. helen.
S~e~ h~ps sha~ M constructed ~n con~o~n~
vith ~esign guideZincs ~at have ~eln IIC~ZLIA~ by the
Section 5, kdd!~ions~ ~ers~lons and Removals,
~di~i~s,-altsrs~l~ns or renovate eZ any or
s~l speed h~pm ~ay occur It lily time.
Blotion S. Not~icltig~.
After'the construction of speed h~p8 on each
new street~ the.~lrector o~ inginee~l~ BoWieel
said construction vhere theyMy ~ncur
ATT88T:
18051 9Ry-34ee
CAW OFtletS
3ztO0 IRtSTOl, 2TRI:I::T
SUIT[ 240
NICe.~At ~/kI,,IFC)FIN IA 9aeZ6
f714) S4S-SlS~
IZl3) ~8-0800
TCLICO~IER: I/a)
TO:
Honorable Chairman Knox Johnson and
Members of the Traffic Safety Commission
FROM:
DATE:
John E. Cavanaugh, Deputy City Attorney
November 28, 1990
SUBJECT: Pavement Undulations and Traffic Diverters
BACKGROUND:
The City Attorney has been requested for an opinion
relative to the legality'of pavement undulation, i.e.,
"speed bumps," and traffic diverters, as well as the
potential impact such devices would have on City liability.
OUESTIONS FRRS~.~D:
Are 'speed bumps' and/or traffic diverters legal
under' existing State law?
If speed bumps and/or traffic diverters are legal,
what impact, if any, would placement of these
devices on city streets have on City liability
should accidents or injuries result therefrom?
SUMMARY CONCT~STONS:
Statutory law does not expressly provide for or
prohibit the use of either speed bumps or traffic
diverters, however, if such devices are considered
'traffic control devices' the City's authority to
use them is preemptedbyState law.
Potential liability arising out of the use of speed
bumps and/or traffic diverters appears to outweigh
the potential benefits·
DISCUSSION:
OUESTION ~ - T~G~T. AUTHORTTY.
Section 440 of the California Vehicle Code defines
'official traffic control device' as:
· . .any sign, signal, marking or device,
consistant with Section 21400, placed or
erectedby authority of a public body or
official having jurisdiction, for the
purpose of regulating, waning, or
guiding traffic, but does not include
islands, curbs, traffic barriers, or
other roadway design features.
There is some questio~ as to whether speed bumps and other
similar devices fall within the above definition. However,
it is not clear that such devices do not constitute traffic
barriers or roadway design features, and therefore fall
within the exception provided in the definition. The
California Traffic Control Devices Committee has apparently
taken no formal action with respect to the classification of
speed bumps.
If speed bumps are properly considered "traffic
control devices', then the City has no legal authority to
place speed bumps on the public streets and/or highways·
Section 21401 of the Vehicle Code provides that only those
traffic control devices which conform to the uniform
standards end specifications promulgated by the Department
of Transportation may. be placed upon a street or highway.
To date, the Department of Trenspor~ation has not
pzomulgated any uniform standards or specifications for
speed bumps.
OUESTION 2 - POTeNTTAT. T.TARTT.TTy.
Section 830.6 of the Government Code provides that
a public entity is not liable for injury caused by the plan
or design of the construction of any improvement to public
property when those plans or designs are approved in advance
or prepared in conformity with standards previously
-2-
approved. In order to avail itself to the immunity provided
by this Section, the governmental entity should plan or
design the improvement to conform with reasonable and safe
standards -- i.e., u~iform standards. Without such
standards to base its design decision upon, the City would
not be covered by the immunity provided by Section 830.
and therefore risks substantial liability in the event of an
accident and subsequent
The placement of obstructions on public streets,
such as speed bumps or traffic diverters, would not conform
to standards considered reasonable and safe. Furthermore,
such obstructions may create a hazardous condition even to
those who drive at normal speeds, end may expose the City to
considerable potential liability for injury end property
damage. .In January 1975, the City of San Jose considered
the precise question now being considered by this
Commission.. San Jose staff recommended rejection of speed
bumps noting that:
'. . .1. SPeed bumps are not ef[ect4ve ~n reduc~n~ speeds.
For most vehicles, the faster you go over the speed
bump, the more comfortable the ride and the less
noticeable the bump. Far from reducing speeds,
speed bumps would therefore cause drivers to speed
up to. minimize discomfort and shock.
2. SPeed bumps are potentially extremely hazardous.
Darticul arl v ~or b~ cvcles. motorcvcles. and
f~re~.~ahters on' ~e trucks. While all of the
bumps [in the City's study] were rated as an
extreme hazard to the unsuspecting bicyclist, one
bump bent the steel rim of the test bicycle's front
wheel, and would have caused an accident if the
rider had not been properly prepared. In the
motorcycle tests, a highly-trained motorcycle
officer was launched 16 feet in the air and
narrowly escaped an accident when he almost bounced
over the handlebars from the impact.
In the lower speed tests of the fire truck, the
firefighters on the rear of the truck were launched
from one foot to a foot-and-a-half in the air. It
was their opinion that if they had no~ been
prepared for the bump because it was a test
situation, they probably-would have bean thrown to
~he street. It should be underscored that these
are only obvious hazards and that in our opinion,
other vehicles were probably experiencing
significant damage to the steering mechanisms,
wheels, shocks, etc., that we could not measure.
The City's potential exposure to liability for
placement of speed bumps and other similar traffic diversion
devices on City streets far outweighs the limited benefit
provided by them. There may be other mechanisms available
to control speed on residential streets which do not carry '-
with them the concurrent liability exposure.
I hope this information is helpful to the
CoMmission. Please feel free to contacit me should you have
any additional questions in this matter.
j ec/~18344: slb
Respectfully submitted,
ce:
Tim Serlet, City Engineer
City of Temecula
Mark Greenwood
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL:
CITY ATTORNEY ~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER /~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official
August 24, 1993
Building and Safety July, 1993, Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
DISCUSSION:
The following is a summary of activity for July, 1993.
Building Permits Issued ...................................... 215
Building Valuation .................................... 96,900,802
Revenue Collected ..................................... 982, 157
Housing Starts ............................................. 53
New Commercial Starts ........................... 3 = 4,391 Sq. Ft.
Commercial Additions/Alterations ................... 13 = 19,076 Sq. Ft.
Building Inspections ...................................... 2,100
V:~WPU~GENDA.REI~July'93.Ri~t
Agenda Repo~
August 24, 1993
Page 2
The following is an update of projects of special note that staff is currently involved
with and/or recently completed.
New Construction
Rancho California Water District Headquarters
Midnight Roundup
Percent ComDleted
100%
100%
V:%WP~AGENDA.REP%July'g3. Rpt
sss§
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
ugust 24, 1993
Monthly Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and File
Discussion:
The following is a summary of the Planning Department's
caseload and project activity for the month of July 1993:
Caseload Activity:
The department received 18 applications for administrative cases and 11 public hearing
cases for the month of July. The following is a breakdown of case type for public
hearing items:
Conditional Use Permits
Change of Zone
Extension of Time:
Parcel Map
Plot Plan
Tentative Track Map
Rot Plan
Parcel Map
Subdivision
1
1
3
1
2
1
1
1
Ongoing Projects:
General Plan: To date the Council has reached a consensus on all the elements
but housing. That element as well as the Environmental Impact Report and
Mitigation Monitoring Program was discussed at the August 17th City Council
meeting.
Old Town Specific Plan: Staff is working with the Old Town Merchants Town
Association to set up a Main Street organization for Old Town. The Plan will
be scheduled for City Council review upon completion of the General Plan.
R:~,S\MONTHLY.RPT%1993%JULY.93 8/18/93 vgw 1
French Valley Airport: The County has received a grant from the Federal
Aviation Administration, to prepare the Airport Facility Master Plan for French
Valley Airport. The comprehensive Land Use Plan and Master Plan will be
developed concurrently. The City has just received Phase I of the Airport
Master Plan. Staff is currently reviewing the document and will be providing
comments on the draft.
Temecula Reaional Center SpeCifiC Plan and Environmental Imoact Report: This
Specific Plan was presented at a Planning Commission Workshop on May 4,
1992. The Commissioners gave direction to the applicant and staff, This
Specific Plan went to a DRC meeting January 5, 1993. Staff is awaiting
submittal of additional information. Environmental Impact Report 340 prepared
for the Temecula Regional Center was approved by the Planning Commission
on June 21, 1993 and certified by the City Council on July 13, 1993.
Winchester Hills and CamDos Verdes Soecific Plans and Environmental Imoact
Reoorts: These Specific Plans were discussed at a Planning Commission
Workshop on May 4, 1992. The Commissioners gave direction to the applicant
and staff. The Notice of Completion for the Campos Verdes EIR went to State
Clearinghouse July 10, 1992. Both of these Specific Plans went to the DRC
meetings on January 5, 1993. Staff is awaiting submittal of additional
information.
Murdv Ranch Specific Plan and Environmental Impact ReDort: This Specific
Plan was presented to the Planning Commission at a Workshop on April 6,
1992. The Commission provided Staff end the applicant direction relative to
design issues. The applicant has incorporated these changes into the Specific
Plan. This Specific Plan will be scheduled for a Planning Commission meeting
upon completion of the Development Agreement and the Congestion
Management Plan.
Johnson Ranch Soecific Plan: Staff has met with the applicant and a revised
Specific Plan will be submitted. At their June 7, 1993 meeting, the Planning
Commission recommended appointed of two Commissioners to sit on a sub-
committee to assist in the development of the Specific Plan.
Attachment:
1. Count & Valuation Summary by Type - page 3
R:~S~MONTHLY.RPT~1993~JULY.93 8118/93 vgw 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
REVENUE STATUS REPORT
JULY 1993
R:\S\MONTHLY.RP'D, 1993UULY.93 8118/93 vow 3
REVPR I N~
OS/~.-"Q3
161
ACCOUNT #
4101
4102
4103
4105
4106
4107
4108
4109
4110
4112
4113
4117
4118
4120
4121
~122
417""'
A125
4126
A127
4128
4129
4130
4131
~132
~133
4135
~138
~139
~,140
10:25:28
GENERAL FUND
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION
AHENDED FINAL HAP
APPEALS
CERT. OF LAND DIV. CCl4PLIANCE
EXTENSION OF TIHE
SINGLE FAHILY TRACTS
HULTI-FAHILY TRACTS
PARCEL NAPS
LOT LINE ADJUSTlINT
NINON CHANGE
PARCEL lIRGER (2-4 LOTS)
REVERS]ON TO ACREAGE (S+LOTS)
SPEC]AL SERVICE LETTER
SECONO UNIT PERNITS
CHARGE OF ZONE
CONDITIONAL USE PERNIT
CONSISTENCY CHECKS
GENERAL PLAN AHENDIINT
PLOT PLAN
PUBLIC USE PERHIT
REVISED PERNIT
SETBACK ADJUSTHENT
SPECIFIC PLAN
SUBSTANTIAL COHFONHANCE
TEH(X~ARY OUTDOOR EVENT
TENPQRARY USE PERHIT
VARIANCE
ZONING ]NFONHATION LETTER
CEQA (INITIAL STUDIES)
CEQA ENVIROHENT II4PACT REPORT
DEVELOPHENT AGREElINT
GEOLOGY CEQA
GEOLOGY ORD. 547APZ
LAFCO
PARCEL HAP/MAIVER
NERGER
AMENDED FINAL TRACT/PAR. HAP
CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
CONDO TRACT HAP
REVERSION TO ACREAGE
LOT REVISION AFTER CHECK
LOT LINE ADJUST. PLAN CHECK
CERT. OF CORRECT. PLAN CHECK
CERT. OF CQi4PL]ARCE PLAN CHECK
COld). CERT. OF COHPL. PLN. CK.
CERT. OF PAR. MERCER PLAN CK
VACATIONS PLAN CK
CITY OF TENECULA
REVENUE STATUS ItEPOItT
JULY 1993
ADJUSTED
ESTINATE
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
,00
.00
,00
,00
.00
,00
,00
.00
,00
,00
JULY
REVENUE
2,7,r,6.00
3,810.00
.00
.00
2,27'/.00
.00
27).00
250.00
' .00
.00
.00
.00
.00
18.00
,00
.00
,00
.00
,00
,00
.00
.00
.00
,00
,00
.00
,00
.00
,00
,00
.00
.00
199)-9&
REVE~
2,746.00
3,810.00
.00
.00
2,2Tf. O0
.00
27'5.00
250.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.O0
18.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
BALANCE
.00
.00
.OO
Z,O~.O0-
18,/~i.00-
.00
1,205.00-
1,120.00-
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
2,7~.00-
3,810.00-
.00
.oo
147,72~.00
.00
273.00-
250.00-
.00
.O0
.00
.00
.00
18.00-
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
PAGE 1
XCOL
1.5
REVPR I N2
08117193
001
161
ACCOUNT #
414,8
6169
6150
6151
&152
6153
4156
6155
~156
6157
6169
6170
6175
6180
6200
6226
4260
~262
4369
10:25:28
5EHERAL FUND
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION
DOCUNENT PROCESSING
CONDEFlATION PLAN CHECK
REVERSION TO ACRE. PLAN CHECK
PARCEL NAP PLAN CHECK
TRACT NAP PLAN CHECK
ANEIIDED NAP PLAN CHECK
6TN & MS. IUBNITTALS
FENA STUOY REVIE'V
LCI4A REVIEV
DRAINAGE STUDY REVIEV
IllPROVE INSPECTION ON-SITE
K-RAT STUDY FEES
FAST TRACK PLANNING
FORliA FAST TRACK
IN HOUSE PLAN CHECKS
TEI4PORARY USE PERIlIT
ACCESSORY VIND ENERGY
LARGE FN41LY DAY CARE
HAZARDGJS ~/ASTE FACILITY
LAND DIV UNIT NAP
LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK
REVEIKIE TO DATE
GENERAL FUND
CITY OF TEHECULA
REVENUE STATUS REPORT
JULY 1993
ADJUSTED
ESTINATE
.00
.00
.OO
.O0
.O0
.00
.00
.00
.OO
.00
.00
.OO
.OO
.00
.OO
.O0
.00
,00
,00
.00
,00
150,000.00
150,000.00
JULY
REVENUE
35,705.80
199)-9&
REVENUE
.00
.00
35,7O5.80
35,705.80
PACE 2
BALANCE Z COl.
.00
114,29&.20 ~8
114,29~.20 23.8
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
August 24, 1993
Public Works Monthly Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly
Activity Report for August, 1993. Please note that the reports from the Capital Projects and
Traffic Divisions have been added to supplement the reports from the Land Development and
Maintenance Divisions. The Maintenance report has also been expanded to provide more
detail.
pwOS~agd rpt%93\0824~rnoactrpt
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Monthly Activity Report
August 1993
//'pc~_~Submitted by: Tim D. Serlet
Prepared by: Don Spagnolo
WORK IN PROGRESS:
Ynez Road:
The Contractor is paving Phase I of the project from Solana Way to Rancho California Road. Also
the Contractor is constructing other concrete improvements, including curb and gutter, sidewalk,
driveway and display pads for auto dealerships. The Contractor anticipates starting Phase II including
the medians starting the week of August 16th. The work will proceed from Rancho California Road
northerly towards Solana Way.
CRC:
The Contractor has completed most of the improvements on the outside of the building and is
working on the interior wiring, plumbing, walls and utility hook-ups. Contractors is also working on
construction of the curb and gutter and grading of the park area. The amphitheater and pool areas
are also taking shape with about 50% of the work completed. The Contractor will now be starting
on landscape and irrigation.
Senior Center:
The Contractor has completed exterior parking lot improvements including retaining wall end storm
drain systems with the only remaining item being the concrete split rail fence to be installed adjacent
to Sixth Street. This should be completed in two weeks.
Marc~arita/La Serene Traffic Signal:
The Contractor is waiting for supplier to deliver signal poles. The Contractor anticipates that it should
be within the next week. The project completion is estimated to be approximately two weeks after
installation of the poles.
PROJECTS OUT TO BID:
There are three new projects that are currently out to bid. They include Pujol Street Improvements,
with a bid opening date on September 9th, Jefferson Avenue Storm Drains, with a bid opening date
on August 26, and Rancho Vista Sidewalk Improvements, with a bid opening date on August 26,
1993.
PROJECT UNDER DESIGN:
Projects presently under design include the Sports Park Slope Repairs. This project includes
preparation of plans and specifications for repair of slope that failed at the Sports Park along
Margarita Road and improvements to the natural channel from Margarita Road to 500 feet past the
tot lot.
pwO5%n~oectrpt%oip%euguet 081093
TRAFFIC DIVISION
Monthly Activity Report
August 1993
/r~Submitted by: Tim D. Serlet
Prepared by: Marty Leuber
I. TRAFFIC REtlUESTS
II.
TRAFFIC REQUESTS:
Received
Completed
Under Investigation
Scheduled for Traffic Commission
June'
13
7
2
1
July
8
12
1
1
ONGOING PROJECTS:
A. Research proposed taxi-cab ordinance.
B. Traffic signals.
1. Margarita / Ave. Barca - design 90% completed
2. Nicholas / Winchester - initial stage of design
3. S.R. 79(s) / Margarita - base date research completed
C. Signing & Stripping planchecks.
D. Prepare RFP for emergency preemption system (Opticom).
E. Inventory of Stop signs, Stop ahead signs and sidewalks in process.
F. Riverside Transit Agency
1. Diverted bus route to Temecula Middle School bus drop off area when school
is in session.
2. Investigate other route changes such as providing a stop adjacent to the new
Senior Center.
pwOS~n~oeetrpt~traffio~euguetju 031393
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
~/.~.~rad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
August 6, 1993
Monthly Activity Report - July 1993
The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division
in-house personnel for the month of July, 1993:
I. SIGNS
A. Total signs replaced 15
B. Total signs installed 41
C. Total signs repaired 6
II. TREES
A. Total trees trimmed for 46
sight distance and street
sweeping concerns
III. POTHOLES
A. Total square feet of 38
potholes repaired
IV. CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins 14
cleaned
V. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for 72,150
right-of-way abatement
Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 26 service order requests ranging from weed abatement,
tree trimming, sign repair, AoC. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings.
This is compared to 33 service order request of the month June, 1993.
The Maintenance Crew has also put in 71 hours of overtime which includes standby time, P.M.
surveillance (weekends only), and response to street emergencies.
pw05~roads~actrpt~93~07 0714
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - JULY, 1993
Page 2
ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING AND STENCILING COMPANY has comoleted the followina:
· 167 L.F. of new and repainted striping Thermo Plastic
· 0 L.F. of sand blasting
· 0 L.F. of red curb
· 18 new and repainted legends Thermo Plastic
The total cost for Orange County striping service was $1,209.55 compared to $1,550.65 for June,
1993.
LARUE PAINTING (Graffiti Removal Contractor) has completed the followina:
· 92 Locations for removals compared to 85 locations for June, 1993
· 22,050 S.F. of removals compared to 13,450.00 S.F. for June, 1993
The total cost for graffiti removal service was $4,497.50 compared to $4,707.50 for the month "~
June, 1993.
ARBOR PRO TREE SERVICE has oerformed the foliowine:
· 2 Pepper trees trimmed, root prune and back filled
· 2 trees root prune and back fill
· Shape I tree
· Remove and stump grind 4 dead trees
The total cost for tree services was $800.00 for the month of July, 1993.
The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of July, 1993 was
$21,858.99 compared to $56,204.90 for the month of June, 1993.
CC:
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development
Marry C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer
pwO5\roads\actrpt\93~07 0714
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - JULY, 1993
Page 3
STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS
DEL RIO ENTERPRISE
Account No. 5402
Date: July 13, 1993
28750 Vallejo
Subex, base and compact two driveway approaches from existing A.C. to concrete driveway. Place
3" asphalt over 6" base and overlay existing A.C. to street.
28720 Vallejo
Subex, base and compact easterly driveway only from existing to boundary of City right-of-way.
Place 3" asphalt over 6" base and overlay existing concrete or A.C. to street.
TOTAL A.C. 37 Tons
TOTAL S.F. 2,142
TOTAL COST $2,942.00
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
Account No. 5402
Date: July 14, 15, & 16, 1993
Rancho California Road east of Moraga
Repair slope on south side of Rancho California Road and hydroseed 15,000 sq. ft.
TOTAL COST: $9,000.00
NELSON PAVING & SEALING
Account No. 5402
Date: July 20, 1993
Rainbow Canyon Road from entrance to Temecula Creek Inn to City Limits
167 locations repair potholes
TOTAL S.F. 1,822
TOTAL A.C. 20 Tons
TOTAL COST: $4,201.00
MONTELEONE EXECAVATING
Account No. 5402
Date: July 26 & 27, 1993
16 hours shoulder moving in Meadow View Area
TOTAL COST: $980.00
pwOS\roads\actrpt~93~07 0714
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - JULY, 1993
Page 4
Account No. 5402
Date: July 26, 1993
Pala Road from Loma Linda to U-Haul Storage
Shoulder grade approximately 2,000' square feet
TOTAL COST:
9985.00
Account No. 5401
Date: July 27, 1993
Pala Road from Loma Linda to Concrete Channel
Clean and excavate approximately 1,000' of channel to relieve nuisance water
TOTAL COST:
9990.00
Account No. 5402
Date: July 29,1993
Caile De Velardo
Back-fill and compact 12' x 30' AoC. road failure
Install 40 L.F. of A.C. Berm
TOTAL A.C. 65 i ,~
TOTAL S.F. 400
TOTAL COST: 93,750.00
TOTAL COST ACCT #5401 9 990.00
TOTAL COST ACCT 85402 921,858.00
pwOS\roads~actrpt\93~07 0714
I DATE
07-06-93
07-06-93
07-06-93
07-07-93
07-07-93
07-09-93
07-09-93
e"~9-93
--'~
07-12-93
07-12-93
07-12-93
07-12-93
07-15-93
07-15-93
07-16-93
07-16-93
07-19-93
07-19-93
07-22-93
07-22-93
07-22-93
LOCATION
Calls Aragon E/O Rancho Calif.
Rd.
40970 Alton Court
41300 Promenade
31252 Enfield Lane
San Pasqual & Del Rey Road
Hwy. 79 @ Jedediah Smith Road
Mira Loma & Southern Cross
44845 Potestas Drive
29488 Courtney Place
29826 Via Puesta del Sol
45387 Clubhouse Drive
32229 Calesito Fadrique
Riverton Park
Winchester Collection Field behind
the tract.
Calls Aragon
Loma Portola
Rancho Calif. Road ~ Calls
Aragon
30052 Corte Carrizo
40371 Calls Medusa
42421 Cosmic
29915 Mira Loma Drive
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
JULY 1993
SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG
IREQUEST
Sinkhole
Sidewalk Failure
Graffiti
Sidewalk Sinkhole
Unknown spill
Weeds
Catch Basins
Graffiti
Request for blue curb
PVC Pipe (Pick-up)
Trash concern
Ground water in back yard
Mud hole on dirt road
Clear weeds
Root pruning
Trash in row
R.C.W.D. trench failure
C.R.& R complaint
Sweeper problem
Root prune tree
Island repair
I WORK COMPLETED
07-06-93
07-06-93
07-06-93
07-07-93
07-07-93
07-09-93
07-09-93
07-09-93
07-12-93
07-12-93
07-12-93
07-13-93
07-16-93
07-15-93
07-16-93
07-16-93
07-19-93
07-19-93
07-22-93
07-22-93
07-22-93
-1- pwO3%roade/wkcmpltd%07. 081093
SERVICE ORDER REQUEST - July, 1993
07-22-93
07-26-93
07-27-93
07-28-93
07-30-93
40183 Walcott Lane
29935 Via Puesta del Sol
31411 De Portola Road
De Portola Road and Margarita Rd.
30447 Spica
Needs barricade
Pick-up trash bags
Questions of easement
Flooded intersection
Catch Basin needs cleaning
07-22-93
07-26-93
07-27-93
07-28-93
07-30-93
TOTAL SOR'S 26
-2- pwO3%roadslwkcmpltd%07. 081093
DATE
07-01-93
:07-02-93
:07-01-93
07-08-93
07-12-93
.~-12-93
~.. -i4-93
07-14-93
07-15-93
07-15-93
07-20-93
07-21-93
07-22-93
07-22-93
07-26-93
07-26-93
07-27-93
07-29-93
~'-~29-93
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
JULY 1993
LOCATION
"C" St. N/O & S/O Santiago
Santiago E/O "C" Street
Rancho Vista E/O Ynez
Margarita Road N/B N/O Via
Lavida
3rd @ Mercedes
J. Smith @ 79 S. Hwy.
Rancho Calif. Rd. W/O Humber
Rancho Calif. Rd. E/O Cosmic
Rancho Calif. Rd. E/O Cosmic
Front St. N/O Rancho Calif. Rd.
Front St. N/O Rancho Calif. Rd. to
Del Rio Road
Front St. N/O Del Rio Road
Front St. @ Haciendas
Front St. @ Empire Creek
Pala Rd. N/O Loma Linda
First from Front St. to end of
Culdesac
Pala Road from Loma Linda to
Hwy. 79
Front Street N/O Del Rio
Front Street N/O Montezuma
WEED A BA TEMEN T
WORK COMPLETED
Abated 6,500 S.F. ROW Weeds
Abated 3,500 S.F. ROW Weeds
Abated 7,250 S.F. ROW Weeds
Abated 150 S.F. ROW Weeds
Abated
Abated
Abated
Abated
Abated
Abated
Abated
50 S.F. ROW Weeds
1,500 S.F. ROW Weeds
1,000 S.F. ROW Weeds
5,000 S.F. ROW Weeds
5,000 S.F. ROW Weeds
5,000 S.F. ROW Weeds
12,500 S.F. ROW Weeds
Abated 5,000 S.F. ROW Weeds
Abated 5,000 S.F. ROW Weeds
Abated - 1,000 S.F. ROW Weeds
Abated 2,500 S.F. ROW Weeds
Abated 300 S.F. ROW Weeds
Abated 4,900 S.F. ROW Weeds
Abated 500 S.F. ROW Weeds
Abated 3,000 S.F. ROW Weeds
- 1 - pwO3%roade~wkcmpltd%O7.Wee 081193
Weed Abatement - July, 1993 (Continued)
07-30-93 N. General Kearney W/O Nicholas Abated 2,500 S.F. ROW Weeds
TOTAL S.F. WEED ABATEMENT
72,150
-2- pwO3\roads%wkcmpltd%O7.Wee 081193
I DATE
07-01-93
07-07-93
07-08-93
e/'~-5,93
07-19-93
07-19-93
07-26-93
07-28-93
07-29-93
07-29-93
07-30-93
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
· ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
JULY 1993
LOCATION
Santiago W/O "C" Street
Front Street N/B & SIO Del Rio
Rancho Vista ~i) Mira Loma
Drive
Front St.N/O Rancho Calif. Rd.
Front S/B to Moreno
Front St. N/O Rancho Calif. Rd.
Pala Road @ Clubhouse
Front Street N&S Ca!le Cortez
Front Street SIO Del Rio
Front St. N/O Rancho Calif. Rd.
N.Gen'l Kearney W/O Nicholas
TREES
I WORK COMPLETED
Trimmed 2 trees
Trimmed 2 trees
Trimmed 7 trees
Trimmed 7 trees
Trimmed 6 trees
Trimmed 12 trees
Trimmed 2 trees
Trimmed 4 trees
Trimmed I tree
Trimmed 2 trees
Trimmed 2 trees
TOTAL 46 trees trimmed
pwO3b'oads~wkcmplt~93%7.tre 081193
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
JULY 1993
I DATE
07-01-93
07-01-93
f LOCATION
Front Street (Old Town)
Ynez Road (i) Rancho Cal|f. Rd.
CA TCH BASIN
~WORK COMPLETED
12 Basins cleaned and secured
2 Basins cleaned and secured
TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED
14
-1 - pwO3~roads\wkcmpltd~,93~07.CB 081093
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
JULY 1993
SIGNS
DATE
07-08-93
07-08-93
07-12-93
07-13-93
07-13-93
0'~"3-93
07-13-93
07-13-93
07-14-93
07-16-93
07-19-93
07-22-93
07-23-93
07-23-93
07-27-93
07-27-93
07-27-93
07-28-93
07-28-93
0,-~8.93
07-28-93
LOCATION
Margarita Road N/B NIO Vailavida
Mira Loma ~) Rancho Vista
Ynez @ La Paz
Wabash S/O Hwy. 79 S.
Cupeno W/O Hwy. 79 S.
Butterfield N/O Rancho California Road
Sonoma @ End
Heitz Lane E/O Sonoma Lane
Business Park Drive @ City Hall
6th ~ Front Street
Keweah Road W/O Calle Medusa
27576 Commerce Center Drive
Overland ~) Commerce
First and Front Street
Cupeno ~i) Pala
Pechanga e Cupeno
Ave. Barca ~) Margarita
Felix Valdez @ Vicent Moraga
Balda Circle ~b Feliz Valdez
Cupeno E/O Wabash
Pachanga Drive and Wabash
WORK COMPLETED
Replaced Type "N" (knocked-down)
Replaced R-1 (Graffiti)
Replaced S.N.S, (stolen)
-installed R-2 25
Installed R-2 25
Installed I C-2 2 Type "N"
Installed I C-2 2 Type "N"
Installed I C-2 2 Type "N"
Installed 3 directional signs
Replaced R-1 & S.N.S. (knock-down)
Installed 4 C-2
Replaced 4 R-26 (Graffiti)
Replaced 3 R-1 (Graffiti)
Installed 2 "N" W-31
Installed 2 N.H.W Signs
Installed I N.H.W. Signs
Replaced R-1 (Graffiti)
Installed R-1
Installed R-1
Installed N.H.W. Sign
Installed N.H.W. Sign
pwO3%roade~wkcmpltd%93%O7.sgn 081193
Signs - July, 1993 IContlnued)
07-28-93
07-28-93
07-28-93
07-28-93
07-28-93
07-28-93
07-28-93
07-28-93
07-29-93
07-30-93
07-30-93
Margarita (i) De Portola
Paseo de las Olas ~i) Meadows
Parkway
Paseo Goleta ~i) Rancho Vista -
Rancho Vista WIO Ca!le Santa Ana
Rancho Vista W/O Paseo Goleta
Rancho Vista W/O Via El Greco
Rancho California WIO Tajo
Escalada Drive and Santa Cecilia
Rancho Calif. Road E/O Business Park
Drive
Rancho Vista and Rancho Ca!if. Road
N. General Kerney WIO Nicholas
Installed 2 W-55
Installed N.H.W.
Sign
Installed N.H.W. Sign
Installed N.H.W. Sign
Installed N.H.W. Sign
Installed N.H.W. Sign
Installed N.H.W. Sign
Replaced R-1 (Graffiti)
Installed W-75 & W-11
Repaired N.W.S.
Replaced "N"
(knock-down)
TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED
TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED
TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED
15
41
6
COMMUNITY SERVICES
DISTRICT
ITEM
NO.
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD JULY 27, 1993
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order
on Tuesday, July 27, 1993, at 8:10 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol
Street, Temecula, California, president Patricia H. Birdsall presiding.
PRESENT: 4 DIRECTORS:
ABSENT: I DIRECTORS:
Parks, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
Mufioz
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, Assistant City Manager Harwood Edvalson,
City Attorney F. Scott Field, City Clerk June S. Greek and Recording Secretary Gail Zigler.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Parks to approve Consent
Calendar Item No. 1.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4
NOES: 0
ABSENT: I
DIRECTORS: Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Birdsall
DIRECTORS: None
DIRECTORS: Mu~oz
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of the meeting of June 22, 1993.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
None
CSDMINO7127193 -1 - 08/02/93
COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT MINUTES JULY 27, 1993
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
Community Services Director Shawn Nelson advised that the survey cards to the individual
property owners with slopes along Margarita Road will be mailed this week.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
None
ADJOURNMENT
President Birdsall declared the meeting adjourned at 8:15 P.M.
The next regular meeting of the Temecula Community Service District will be held on August
10, 1993, 8:00 PM, at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula,
California.
ATTEST:
President Patricia H. Birdsall
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CSDMIN07127193 -2- 0W02193
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORT
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FROM:
DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER
DATE:
AUGUST 24, 1993
SUBJECT:
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
PREPARED BY: ~ SHAWN D. NELSON, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR
The City has completed the plan check process regarding Pala Community Park. It
is expected that this project will be out for public bid by the end of August, 1993.
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan was reviewed and approved by the Community
Services and Planning Commissions. The Master Plan will be forwarded for
consideration by the City Council after the General Plan has been adopted.
The Kent Hindergardt Memorial Park located in the Presley Development is currently
on 90 day maintenance and should be dedicated to the City this fall. Also, this park
is being constructed by the developer to meet the Quimby requirements for the
Presley subdivision project.
The construction of Paloma Del Sol Park is near completion. This park will consist of
two lighted ballfields with soccer overlays, restroom/snack bar facility, and parking
improvements. This park is expected to be dedicated to the City in October, 1993.
The Senior Center is currently under construction and is expected to be completed in
September, 1993. Also, staff was informed by the County of Riverside, Office on
Aging Department that the City's Senior Center has been selected as an approved site
for a daily Nutrition For Seniors Program. This program is totally funded by the Office
on Aging other than the City has to provide a facility for the program. All costs of
staffing, food preparation, and administration will be borne by the Office on Aging.
Phase II of the Community Recreation Center (CRC) Project is moving forward with
the roofs and ceilings for the gymnasium and multi-purpose room nearly completed.
Staff is now. working with the CRC Foundation to determine equipment and furniture
needs for the CRC. It is anticipated that the CRC will be completed in December,
1993.
The development of a skateboarding area in the Rancho California Sports Park was
approved in the five (5) year Capital Improvement Program under the Sports Park
Parking Lot Project. Staff is in the process of selecting a landscape architect and
forming a project committee comprised of skateboarders and Teen Council members
to develop a design for the skateboarding area.
A pre-construction meeting for the construction of Riverton Park will be scheduled
within the next 30 days and construction should commence by the end of September,
1993.
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY