HomeMy WebLinkAbout101293 CC AgendaAGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER - 28816 PUJOL STREET
OCTOBER 12, 1993 - 7:00 PM
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will
determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00
PM and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting.
All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM
EXECUTIVE SESSION: 5:30 PM - Closed Session of the CITy Council pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to discuss pending litigation regarding Pechanga
Tdbal Council vs. the CITy of Temecula; CITy of Temecule vs. McDoweil; Dawes vs.
City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency and 54956.9(b)
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 93-18
Resolution: No. 93-8:~
CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor J. Sal Mufioz presiding
Invocation
Pastor Gary Ruley, HIS Church Christian Center
Flag Salute
Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs
ROLL CALL:
Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Muf~oz
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Presentation by Temecula Volunteer Fire Department
Certificate of Appreciation - William D. Hillin
Proclamation - Knights of Columbus "Help Retarded
Children Day"
Proclamation - Domestic Violence Awareness Month
Presentation by Peter Archulet8, EMWD, on the Santa
Margarita/San Luis Ray Watershed Agency
Aeeld~071393 1 10/07/13
PUBLIC FORUM
This is a portion of the City Council meeting unique to the City of Temecula. At the
meeting held on the second Tuesday of each month, the City Council will devote a
period of time (not to exceed 30 minutes) for the purpose of providing the public with
an opportunity to discuss topics of interest with the Council. The members of the City
Council will respond to questions and may give direction to City staff. The Council is
prohibited, by the provisions of the Brown Act, from taking any official action on any
matter which is not on the agenda. If you desire to speak on any matter which is not
listed on the agenda, a pink *Request to Speak* form should be filled out and filed with
the City Clerk.
For all other ;.genda items a *Request to Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be
made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these
reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
2
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar ere considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by ~ne roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
Standard Orffinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of September 14, 1993.
)~eende/071383 2 10/07/92
3
4
5
6
Resolution ADoroving tist of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Annual Street Maintenance Contract - Rejection of Bids
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
In accordance with the contract documents, reject all bids for the annual
Street Maintenance Contract and direct staff to continue using the
City's established purchasing procedures modified as attached to
perform daily street maintenance.
Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Develooment of Old Town Temecula Into
a Major Destination Entertainment Facility
RECOMMENDATION:
5ol
Approve and authorize the Mayor to execute a "Memorandum of
Understanding Regarding Development of Old Town Temecula Into a
Major Destination Entertainment Facility".
Adoorion of Travel Policy
(Continued from the meeting of 9/28/93)
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Approve the attached travel policy.
Award Contract to Pave Easement Access Roads and Reoeir P.C.C. Sidewalks at Via
Lobo Channel
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
Award a contract for paving an access road and repairing P.C.C.
sidewalk at Via Lobo Channel to Nelson Paving and Sealing, the lowest
responsible bidder, for the sum of $19,930.00.
Agentis/071383
9
Award Contract to Construct a SinQle Concrete Box Culvert at :~8960 Ynez Road
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Award contract for construction of ·single concrete box culvert located
at 28960 Ynez Road to Monteleona Excavating, the lowest responsible
bidder for the sum of $12,450.
Award Contract to Install Three 36" X 40' CMP's at Two Locations of John Warner
Road
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1
Award a contract for road grading and of installing three 36" X 40'
CMP's at two locations on John Warnar Road to Monteleona
Excavating, the lowest responsible bidder for the sum of $22,950.
10 Contract Amendment No. 1 for Professional Services Industrial Inc. for Materials
Testing at the Community Recreation Center. Project No. 92-029B
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Approve Contract Amendment No. I for additional material testing to
Professional Services Industries, Inc. for the construction of the
Community Recreation Center, Project No. 92-029B, in an amount not
to exceed $15,000.
11 Public/Traffic Safetv Commission Aooointment
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Review the Ad-Hoc Committee recommendations and appoint two
applicants to serve a full three-year term on the Temecula Public/Traffic
Safety Commission.
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
12 Second ReadinQ of Ordinance No. 93-17. Reoealin~ Ordinance 93-13 (Walmart)
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-17
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 93-13
Agenda/0713:93 4 10/07/93
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the
approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences
delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.
13
Aooeal of Plannino Commission Denial of Tentative Tract Mao No. ~5338, Amendment
No. I - A ~8 Unit Condominium Proiect on ~.56 Acres - East of Maroarita Road and
Solone Way
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING
THE APPEAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 25338, AMENDMENT NO. 1,
UPHOLDING PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP NO. 25338, AMENDMENT NO. 1, TO SUBDIVIDE A 2.56 ACRE
PARCEL INTO A 28 UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-330-050
14
Citv of Temecula ~eneral Plan. Imolementation Prooram. Environmental Imoact Reoort
and MitiQation MonitorinQ Proc)ram
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Review the Housing Element, remaining Clean-up Items, Environmental
Impact Report, Mitigation. Monitoring Program and Statement of
Overriding Considerations, and direct staff to incorporate any changes
into the final General Plan;
14.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE
GENERAL PLAN AND ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
Aoe~dN071393 6 10/07/93
14.3 Adopt e resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE CITY
OF TEMECULA
14,4
14.5
Adopt e resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
Adopt a resolution emitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM FOR THE GENERAL PLAN FOR
THE CITY OF TEMECULA
COUNCIL BUSINESS
15
16
Consideration of Temecula Valley Film Council Loan
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Authorize e e5,000 loan to the Temecula Valley
instruct the City Attorney to prepare the
documents.
Old Town Temecula Merchants Association ReQuest for FundinQ
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1
Film Council and
necessary lending
Consider a request from the Old Town Temecula Merchants Association
to fund $24,000.00 to cover advertising on billboard which promotes
Old Town.
· qendN071313 8 10/07/~3
17
Consideration of Auto Mall Maraue Fundinp
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 This report will be forwarded under separate cover.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: October 26 1993, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816
Pujol Street, Temecula, California
/~eetdNO71383 7 10/07/e2
TEMECULA ~OMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ~E'I'IN~ - ITo ~o ~eld ~t 8:00)
CALL TO ORDER:
President Patricia H. Birdsall
ROLL CALL:
DIRECTORS:
Mufioz, Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Birdsall
PUBLIC COMMENT:
CONSENT CALENDAR
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should
present a completed pink 'Request to Speak" to the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and statq
your name and address for the record.
I Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
.Approve the minutes of September 14, 1993.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
2
TCSD Maintenance of Commercial Landscaoe
2.1 Receive and file report concerning maintenance of commercial landscape
areas within the City of Temecula.
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Dixon
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting: October 26, 1993, 8:00 PM, Temecula
Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
Aceida71393 I 10/07/13
TEMECULA R;nEVELOPM;NT A~ENCY MEETING
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding
AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Roberts, Stone, Parks
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a
completed pink 'Request to Speak' to the City Clerk. When you
are called to speak, please come forward and state your name
and address for the record.
AGENCY BUSINESS
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
Approve the minutes of September 14, 1993.
2
Memorandum of Understanding Reoarding Develooment of Old Town Temecula Into
a Maior Destination Entertainment Facility
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Approve and authorize the Chairperson to execute a "Memorandum of
Understanding Regarding Development of Old Town Temecula Into a
Major Destination Entertainment Facility".
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting: October 26, 1993, 8:00 PM, Temecula
Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
AOetdNOTt3f13 8
10/07/93
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
City of Temecula
Certificate of Appreciation
In appreciation and gratitude from the City Council on behalf of the
citizens of the City of Temecula,
Presented to:
William D. Hillin
For his dedicated service to his community as a member of the Community Services
Commission. Mr. Hillin's contributions to the commission, as one of its rounding members,
are greatly appreciated by the City Council and the citizens of the City of Temecula.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto
affixed my hand and official seal this
12th day of February, 1993
J. Sat Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
The City of Temecula
PROCLAMATION
WItEREAS, the Knights of Columbus in the State of California have undertaken a
project of assistance for the treatment and care of mentally retarded children, and;
WHEREAS~ the nearly 60,000 members of Knights of Columbus in California are
conducting their annual state-wide Candy Drive in the communities throughout California, and
WHEREAS, the local area Knights of Columbus No. 9964 will be mobilizing a "Tootsie
Roll Drive" and will be soliciting at all of the major supermarkets in the area, and;
WHEREAS, the proceeds of this campaign will be distributed to not-for-profit agencies
and institutions dedicated to serving mentally retarded children,
NOW, TI1EREFORE, I, J. Sat Mu~oz, on behalf of the City Council of the City of
Temecula, hereby proclaim the week of October 15, 16 and 17, 1993 as
"HELP RETARDED CHILDREN DAYS"
in the City of Temecula, and urge all citizens to recognize and join in the spirit of this important
campaign.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City
of Temecula to be affixed this 12th day of October, 1993.
J. Sat Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
The City of Temecula
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, Domestic Violence, the abuse of a spouse or partner and its impact on their
children, is a significant problem facing all communities in our nation today, affecting not only
current family members but also future generations as violent behavior learned in childhood is
perpetuated when children grow to adulthood; and
WHEREAS, the cycle of Domestic Violence, once begun in a relationship, often
escalates in frequency and severity until it may result in severe injury or death of the victim; and
WHEREAS, comprehensive services for Domestic Violence victims and their children
offer primary prevention, early intervention, crisis management and follow-up support which
empower people to recognize that they have choices and can make changes to reduce the level
of violence in their lives; and
WHEREAS, Alternatives to Domestic Violence is committed to continuing to work with
County and City leaden throughout Riverside County to carry on its fifteen-year tradition of
delivering quality services to victims; and
WHEREAS, increased pubic awareness and support for these victims and services is
essential to the continued maintenance and development of programs to meet this critical need
of our communities;
NOW, THEREFOE, I, J. Sal Mu~oz, on behalf of the City Council of the City of
Temecula, hereby thank and commend the committed volunteers and staff of Alternatives to
Domestic Violence and proclaim the month of October, 1993 to be:
"DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AWARENESS MONTH"
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City
of Temecula to be affixed this 12th day of October, 1993.
J. Sat Mufioz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
~ Alternatives to Domestic Violence
~ ,, P.O. Box 910, Riverside, California 92502
(909) 684-1720 FAX (909) 682-2934
"Horizon House"
Ju.D.e
Greek
Board of DiNeten 1993-94
G~Adame~ in Bank
Mte Adc~ck, T, emmm~ BR ~a~ and ~.
Dist~t A~omey'a Offie
V~ess ~gmm
~lm De~
Jones El~t~c
t A~omey'e Off~ell~die
Dr. D~ Nusaer
~mctor
Bd ~on
dry Vobnti, H~t
Tam ~o~o~
~n H~ Am~t~n
~qe~ North A~un Ven
~n~
~a ~, ie ~t
~ Te~m~
A~L Diatr~t A~omV
~ Te
~v. ~. ~ A~aNRe ~gmm
Ad~te ~oota
~ Ve
~e ~r, I~.
AD V Executive Director
City Council
City of Temecula
43 174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
September 22, 1.993
Dear Sirs/Madames,
Every fifteen seconds a woman is beaten, Domestic violence causes more
injuries to women than rape, auto accklents, and muggings combined.
Children raised in violent homes may repeat the cycle in their own
relationships us adults. The national media often share such information these
days. As you know, the problem is critical right here in Temecula as well.
The month of October has been designated nationally as Domestic Violence
· Awareness Month. Unlike Mother's Day, National Dairy Month, Women's
History Month, and other specially-identified times to honor unique aspects of
American life, "our" month is not a time to celebrate. Instead, it is an
opportunity to focus attention on a crkical social issue that affects each of
whether we realize it or not.
Alternatives to Domestic Violence would appreciate your help in making our
local communities aware of this concern, and of Temecula's commitment to
addressing the problem, by formally proclaiming October to be Domestic
Violence Awareness Month in Temecula. Enclosed is a sample proclamation
which could be used or adapted as appropriate.
If the City Council is able to include this request as an action item on its
agenda for an October meeting, please contact Lois Beckman, Community
Relations/Special Events Manager, or Beverly Speak, Executive Director, at
(909) 684-1720 so we can attempt to mange for an agency representative to
be present. Proclamations from throughout our service area will be shared
with the media and at our annual recognition event.
Thank you so much for your ongoing support for victims of domestic
violence.
Haydee Rider, President
OA United WayAgency
ITEM
NO.
ITEM
NO.
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 1993
A regular meeting of .the Temecula City Council was called to order on Tuesday, September
14, 1993, 5:30 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula,
California, Mayor J. Sal Mufioz presiding.
PRESENT: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Mu~oz
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberts
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney F. Scott Field, City Clerk June
S. Greek and Recording Secretary Gall Zigler.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to recess to an
executive session pursuant to Government Code Section No. 54956.9(b) in the matter of
Zone Change No. PA 93-0043 at 5:30 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor
Pro Tem Roberrs absent.
The meeting was reconvened at 7:10 P.M. with all members present except Mayor Pro Tem
Roberrs.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Minister Sofia Sadler, Harvester Church of Temecula.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the pledge of allegiance by Councilmember Stone.
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Mayor Mur~oz proclaimed September 23, 1993 as Future 2000 Day, a business to business
exposition focusing on leadership skills, management techniques for the future, professional
selling skills, ideas to improve self-esteem and self-awareness, presented to the Inland Empire
Chamber of Commerce.
PUBLIC FORUM
Ralph Megna, Deputy Director of the City of Riverside Redevelopment Agency, 3900 Main
CCM~IOgll 4/83 -1 - ° 9119/83
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 14, 1993
Street, Riverside, provided an overview of the important role museums play in tourism and
economic development·
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Stone advised that he and his wife will be hosting a champagne brunch open
to the public, at his home on Sunday, September 19, 1993. Councilmember Stone said a ~50
donation is requested to help fund a permanent location forthe Temecula Museum.
Mayor Muf~oz advised the Council he attended a seminar on the Endangered Species Act and
received several materials which will be placed at City Hall for public information. Mayor
Mu~oz said he invited Brian Lowe to give a presentation to the City Council on what the
RCHCA is doing to address endangered species and habitats.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Muf~oz removed Item No. 5 from Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Stone removed Item No. 7 from Consent Calendar and stated he would be
voting "NO" on Item No. 15.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve
Consent Calendar Items No. 1 - 4, 6, and 8 - 17.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Mur~oz
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
. ABSENT:. I COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberts
Standard Ordinance Adoorion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
2. Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
CCMIN09114193
-2- 911 9/13
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
2.1 Approve the minutes of August 10, 1993;
2.2 Approve the minutes of August 24, 1993.
SFPTFMBFR 14. 1993
e
Resolution AoDrovinO List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-73
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
City Treasurer's Reoort
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and filethe City Treasurer's report as of July 31, 1993.
Adootion of Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan Fees - Amendment No. 2
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-75
6.2
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE MURRIETA CREEK AREA DRAINAGE
AREA PLAN
Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-14
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 90-04 REGARDING MURRIETA CREEK AREA
DRAINAGE PLAN FEES FOR SUBDIVISIONS
CCMINOgll 4193 -3- ~119/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
8. FY 1993-94 Budoat Amendments for Disaster Relief
SFPT;:MBI:R 14, 1993
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Approve a budget amendment in the amount of $159,107 from the Unreserved
General Fund Balance.
e
"No Parking" Zone on Rancho California Road West of Front Street
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the-City Council adopt
a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-76
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING 'NO PARKING' ZONE ON RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD WEST
OF FRONT STREET
10.
Solicitation of Construction Bids for the Bridoe end Street Imorovements on Liefar Road
at Nicolas Road (PW93-02)
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the Department
of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the bridge and street
improvements on Liefar Road at Nicolas Road (PW93-02).
11.
Award of Contract for the Rancho Vista Road Sidewalk Imorovements (Project No.
PW92-12)
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1
Award a contract for the Rancho Vista Road Sidewalk Improvements, Project
No. PW92-12, to Gosney Construction Backhoe & Equipment for $26,488.10,
and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract;
11.2
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $2,648.81, which is equal to 10% of the contract
amount.
CCIdlN09114193 ..4- 9119/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SI:PTFMBFR 14. 1993
12.
Award of Contract for Jefferson Avenue Storm Drain Imorovements at Winchester
'Road (PW 93-01 )
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1
12.2
Award a contract for the Jefferson Avenue Storm Drain Improvements, Project
No. PW93-01, to Accurate Construction inc. for $61,084.55, and authorize the
Mayor to execute the contract;
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $6,108.46, which is equal to 10% of the contract
amount.
13.
Renewal of Annual Street StriDing Contract FY 93-94
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Extend the Street Striping Contract with Orange County Striping and Stenciling,
Inc. for a period of one year (September 29, 1994) and authorize the Mayor to
execute contract.
14.
Completion and Acceptance of Maroarita Road Interim Imorovements - Project No.
PW92-04
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Accept the street improvements on Margarita Road from Winchaster Road to
Solona Way, Project No. PW92-05, as complete and direct the City Clerk to:
File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and
accept a twelve (12) month Maintenance Bond in the amount of
10% of the contract;
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the
filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
15.
Contract Amendment No. 4 to Community Facilities District 88-1:~ Engineerino
Services Contract with J.F. Davidson Associates. Inc.
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Approve Contract Amendment No. 4 to provide additional engineering services
for CFD 88-12 by J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. in the amount of $32,676.00.
CCMIN09114193 -6- 8118/83
CITY COUNCIl MINUTES
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 3
NOES: 1
ABSENT: I
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
SEPTEMBFR 14. 1993
Birdsall, Parks, Mufioz
Stone
Roberrs
16.
Substitution of Imorovement Bonds in Tract No. 23267-4
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1
Accept substitute Surety Bonds for the improvement of streets, drainage,
sewer and water systems, survey monuments, and for Labor end Materials as
substitutes for bonds submitted to City Council on December 10,1991, for
Final Revised Vesting Tract No. 23267-4 and to direct the City Clerk to release
the original bonds.
17.
Contract Change Orders for Ynez Road Widenine Proiect. PW92-05. CFD 88-12 -
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1
Approve Contract Change Order No. 12, 1.3, 15 and 16 for Ynez Road
Widening Project, PW92-05 for labor and equipment for various items of work,
in the amount of $39,425.78.
CCMIN09114193
Resolution AuthoriZinc) City Reeulation of Rates Charged for the Basic Tier of Cable
Television Service
City Attorney Scott Field presented the staff report.
Mayor Mu~oz asked if staff has an objective with regards to the rates at this time.
Attorney Field said that Inland Valley Cable has already enacted an adjustment of its
rates in conjunction wil~h the regulation.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve
staff recommendation as follows:
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-74
,A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CA,
-6- 911 9193
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
S;:PTI:MBI:R 14. 1993
AUTHORIZING CITY REGULATIONS OF THE RATES CHARGED FOR THE BASIC
TIER OF CABLE TELEVISION SERVICE; AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO DO ALL
THAT IS NECESSARY TO INITIATE RATE REGULATION, INCLUDING WITHOUT
LIMITATION, OBTAINING FCC CERTIFICATION
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Perks, Stone, Mufioz
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
I COUNCILMEMBERS: Robarts
e
Enforcement of Decorum at City Council MeetinQs
City Clerk June Greek advised that the policy and procedures were prepared at the
request of the Chief of Police. She said other contract cities have established policies,
which she and the City Attorney reviewed prior to drafting the policies that are before
the Council.
Pat Kellar, 39201 Salines Drive, Temecule, said that she was in attendance at a recent
meeting where the discussion got out of control. Ms. Kellar said she feels that the
citizens should be able to express their concerns and frustrations end suggested the
Council consider holding an Town Hall meeting open to the citizens.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve
staff recommendation as follows:
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
Approve a Policy and Procedure to provide for the orderly enforcement of
decorum at City Council Meetings.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Mufioz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS:
· Roberrs
CCMIN09/14/93 -7- ' el ! 9/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
PUBLIC HEARINGS
S;PTEMBER 14, 1993
18.
ADoeel of Planning Commission Denial of TentatiVe Tract Mao ~5338. Amendment No.
I - A 28 Unit Condominium Project on 2.56 Acres
City Manager David Dixon advised Council the applicant has submitted a letter
requesting a continuance for thirty days. Mr. Dixon stated the property in question is
currently in foreclosure.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to open
the public hearing at 7:55 P.M. and continue Appeal of Planning Commission Denial
of Tentative Tract Map 25338, Amendment No. 1 to the meeting of October 12,
1993.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
BirdsalL Parks, Stone, Muf~oz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Robarts
,Mayor Mui~oz declared e recess at 8:00 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:00 P.M. following
the Temecula Community Service District and the TemecUla Redevelopment Agency 'meetings.
COUNCIL BUSINESS.
19.
Soeed Undulations Reoort -Calle Pina Colada
Councilmember Birdsall stepped down due to the close proximity of her personal
residence.
Public Works Director Tim Serlet presented the staff report.
Mayor Mur~oz advised that letters of opposition were received from four individuals as
follows:
Don James, Calla Pine Colada
Robert Wolf, Calla Pine Colada
Debra Parnaque, Paseo Serno
Bob Goldsmith, Avenida Del Sol
CCMIN09/14/93 -6.. ' ' 6119/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES S;:PTI:MBI:R 14. 1993
Jayme Christian, 30762 Calls Pine Colada, Temecula, provided a video presentation
of the traffic patterns on Calls Pine Colada. Ms. Christian asked for .the Council's
approval of speed undulations for Calls 'Pine Colada.
Heather Johnson, 30702 Calls Pina Colada, Temecula, expressed her support for the
Council's approval of the speed undulations. Ms. Johnson said she feels that Kahwea
should be opened and Calls Pine Colada closed.
The following individuals were present to express support of staff's recommendation
however, gave up their time for public comment to the presentation by Ms. Christian:
Phil Hoxsy, 43318 Cielo De Azul, Temecula
Pamela Hoenig, 30677 Calls Pine Colada, Temecula
Sam Cuckovich, 30767 Calls Pine Colada, Temecula
Laura Upton, 30869 Calls Pine Colada, Temecula
Terry Cordell, 41284 Bravos Court, Temecula, expressed support for steff's
recommendation.
Peter Huhn, 30879 Calle Pina Colada, Temecula, expressed support for staff's
recommendation.
Joe Pribanic, 30929 Calls Pine Colada, Temecula expressed opposition to the speed
undulation proposal for Calls Pine Coladao
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve
the installation of speed undulations on Calls Pine Colada between Del Rsy Road and
La Serena Way based on staff's recommendation.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Parks, Stone, Muf~oz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall
ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberts
Mayor Muftoz declared a recess at 9:35 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:40 P.M.
25.
ProDosed Lease - Temecula Town Association
Councilmember Birdsall stepped down due to a potential conflict of interest.
CCMINO911 4193 -9., 9/19/~3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SFPTEMBI:R 14, 1993
City Manager David Dixon presented the staff report and asked the Council to refer the
proposed lease between the City and the Temecula Town Association to staff for
negotiation and resolution of competing requests for continued use of the Northwest
Sports Park.
Councilmember Stone said that he would like staff to expedite the discussions and
bring this item back to the Council as soon as possible. Counciimember Stone
suggested staff might consider a permanent facility at this location with bleachers and
show grounds, etc., so that there is not a duplication of these items at every event.
City Manager Dixon advised 'that staff has talked about developing a Master Plan for
that site, however, the Flood Control Department is looking at this site as a retention
basin which may effect the placement of permanent facilities on the property.
Councilmember Parks said he feels the Community Services Director should be
included in future discussions.
Rusty Hoenig, 28570 Red Gum Drive, Lake Elsinore, president of the Temecula Town
Association, said that time is of the essence and asked to be included in the
discussions.
Aggie Goodacre, 28760 Red Gum Drive, Lake Elsinore, representing the Temecula
T, own Association, expressed concern that the 'IrA will be assured a site to hold
future events.
Mayor Muf~oz said he feels staff should understand that the Council does not support
the TTA having veto power over the ultimate design of this facility however, their input
will be considered.
City Manager David Dixon said staff will provide a progress report at the October 26,
1993 City Council meeting.
¸20.
Consideration of a Recvcled Products Purchasing Policv
Finance Officer Mary Jane McLarney presented the staff report.
The Council was unanimously supportive of the policy. Councilmember Birdsall
suggested that a list of recyclable products be distributed to the public to encourage
their participation in the recycling program.
Mayor Mur~oz said he feels this can become an award winning program through staff's
efforts. Mayor Mur~oz said he has suggested that the City of Temecula encourage
recycling businesses to locate in the community.
CCMIN0911 4193 - 1 O- ' ' 811
CITY COUNCIl MINUTES ~FPTFMBFR 14, 1993
Councilmember Parks suggested the City could set up a local prize program for
companies which can creatively advertise the recycling concept.
Ken Dodd, Final Touch Marketing, advised that'the State Department has given a list
of companies throughout the state who participate in recycling products. Mr. Dodd
said this information should be advertised to the local companies.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve
staff recommendation as follows:
20.1 Consider a Recycled Products Purchasing Policy and provide direction to staff.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Mufioz
NOES: 0' COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Robarts
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to extend the
meeting at 10:00 P.M. to 10:30 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Pro
Tem Robarts absent.
21.
DesiQnation of Votino Deleqate for the National League of Cities Annual Conoress
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve
the attendance at the National League Congress of Mayor Mu~oz and Councilmember
Birdsall, designating Mayor Muf~oz as voting representative and Councilmember Birdsall
alternate.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsell, Parks, Stone, Mufioz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Roberts
22. Discussion of ADDrOVal Authority Matrix
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
continue the discussion of the Approval Authority Matrix to the meeting of September
28, 1993, to allow Mayor Pro Tam Roberts to participate in the discussions.
CCMINO911 4193 -11 - 911 9/~3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4
NOES: 0
ABSENT: I
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
S;:PTFMFI;R 14. 1993
Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Mu~ioz
None
Roberrs
23.
Reoort on the Public Noticing Process for PA93-0089. Conditional Use Permit for an
Arco AM\PM Gas Station and Mini-Mart Located at ~8.~31 Ynez Road
Planning Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report.
C0uncilmember Parks said his concern is to get more media coverage of the
controversial issues prior to Planning Commission hearings.
City Manager Dixon suggested a display ad in 3 or 4 of the local papers to inform the
public of up-coming controversial issues.
Councilmember Stone asked the City Attorney to research whether the City could
extend the appeal period from ten (10) days to thirty (30) days.
Mayor Mur~oz said he feels if City should go beyond the minimum limits of notification
of the property and properly posting the property with something the public can read
as they are driving by the subject property.
City Clerk June Greek advised the Council that the City is not legally required to place
notices. on the property, however, the City has adopted a policy to notice by posting
a sign on the subject property. Ms. Greek advised the Council these signs have
recently been redesigned with larger lettering and all notices will be secured under a
plexi-glass cover.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve
staff recommendation to receive and file and directed staff to return at a later date
with a report addressing other suggested noticing methods.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Mur~oz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS:
Robarts
CCMIN09114193 -12- 9119/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
24.
SEPTEMBER 14, 1993
Status Reoort on the Reoulation of Vendina Carts
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to continue
this item to the meeting of 9/28/93.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Mur~oz
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberts
CITY MANAGER REPORT
None
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
None
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to adjourn at
10:40 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Pro Tem Roberts absent.
A General Plan Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, September 21, 1993, at 7:00 PM,
Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California.
The next regular meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on Tuesday,
September 28, 1993, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecule,
California.
ATTEST:
Mayor J. Sal Mufioz
June S. Greek, City Clerk '
CCMIN09114193
- 13- 9119/93
ITEM
NO. 3
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been
audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of
$623,468.43.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOFrED, this 12th day of October, 1993.
ATTEST:
J. Sal Mufioz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
334
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMEC~A)'
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 93~ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Temecula on the 12th day of October, 1993 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOE:
ABSENT:
COUNCILIVIEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Re~om 334 * '
09~3~3 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
09~0~3 TOTALCHECK RUN:
10/12~3 TOTALCHECK RUN:
09/23~3 TOTAL PAYROLL:
CITY OFTEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
$301,523.83
$i 40,543.10
$81,537.80
$99,863.70
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 10/12/93 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001
1 O0
140
190
191
193
210
250
280
330
340
390
PAYROLL:
001
100
190
191
193
300
320
330
GENERAL
GAS TAX
COMMUNITY DEV. BLOCK GRANT
TCSD
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (C!P)
TCSD~:~IP
RDA~IP
SELF-INSURANCE
VEHICLES
INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS
COPY CENTER
FACILITIES
TCSD DEBT SERVICE
GENERAL (PAYROLL)
GAS TAX (PAYROLL)
TCSD (PAYROLL)
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A (PAYROLL)
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C (PAYROLL)
SELF4NSURANCE (PAYROLL)
INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PAYROLL)
COPY CENTER (PAYROLL)
TOTAL BY FUND:
$85,443.56
$4.1,063.04
$4,664.91
$35,490.71
$6,010.20
$10,658.32
· $65,487.56
$19,647,10
$5,315.66
$1,067.24
$368.95
$1,393.16
$4,460.60
$30,744.74
$210,788.98
$64,465.42
$15,364.24
$14,752.04
$414.90
$1,652.62
$535.55
$1,206.26
$1,438.67
$99,863.70
$623,456.43
VOUCHRE2
09/23/93
16:29
CITY OF TEMECULA
VGUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAGE
FUND
001
100
190
191
250
280
300
310
· 320
330
~60
390
TITLE
GENERAL FUND
GAS TAX FUND
COIIqUN]TY SERVICES DISTRICT
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
CAP/TAL PROJECTS - TCSD
REDEVELOPt~NT AGENCY - CIP
INSURANCE FUND
VEHICLES FUND
INFORMAT]ON SYSTEMS
COPY CENTER FUND
FACILITIES
TCSD DEBT SERVICE
TOTAL
AMOUNT
43,524.22
9,934.54
14,047.05
5,672.79
7,209.93
400.00
2,574.27
616.86
~6.76
1.366.16
4°460.60
· 881.67
.Z10,788.98
301,523.83
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 1
09/23/~''' 16:29
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUHBER DATE NUNBER NAHE
ITEN ACCOUNT ITEN
DESCR[PTIOR NUNBER AHOUNT
CHECK
AHOUNT
11888 09/10/93 000901 CPRS SOUTH REGION
REGISTRAtiON/SEPT 28 190--180-999-5258
190.00
190.00
1197~ 09/17/93 001138 REED, NARSNALL NILEAGTE REINIt. 001-120~999-5262
46.09
46.09
11976 09/17/93 000477 DALE E. CARROL, INC, SOIL AMENDMENT
190-180-999-5212
216.58
216.58
11977 09/22/93 000190 HONE BASE
PATIO CHAIRS/SENIOR CEN 190-180-999-5242
245.41
245.41
254941 09/23/93 ooe/:/:/: FIRSTAX (EDD)
254941 09/23/93 000~ FIRSTAX (EDD)
254941 09/23/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDO)
254941 09/23/9] 000444 FIRSTAX (EO0)
254941 09/23/93 0004/,4 FIRSTAX (EDD)
254941 09/23/93 000~ FIRSTAX (EDO)
254941 09/23/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EO0)
254941 09/23/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EOD)
254941 09/23/93 0013444 FIRSTAX (EO0)
254941 09/23/93 000~44 FIRSTAX (EO0)
254941 09/23/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EO0)
254941 09/23/93 0002~,4 FIRSTAX
Z54941 09/23/93 000~4 FIRSTAX (EO0)
000~4 FIRST~ (EDD)
25~9~. d~/2~/95 000~4 F ] RST~ (EDD)
0004~4 SOl 001-2070
000444 ,SOl 100-2070
000~ SOl 190-2070
O00X~4 SOl 191-2070
000~, SOl 193-2070
0013~ SOl 300-~07O
000444' SDI 320-207O
000444 SO l 330- 2070
OOC~.-~/: STATE 001-207O
OOC~: STATE 100-2070
000~ STATE 190-2070
00~.-~/: STATE 191-2070
000~4 STATE 193-2070
O004~e STATE 300-2070
000~ STATE 320-2070
00044/: STATE 330-2070
575.11
146.36
172.88
6.82
26.45
6.87
20.18
20.43
2,428.62
570.93
435.18
19.05
46.94
26.81
56.45
12.78
4,571.86
278964 09/23/93 000283 .FIRSTAX (IRS)
278964 09/23/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
278964 09/23/93 000283 FIRSTAX (]RS)
278964 09/23/93 000283 FIRSTAX (]RS)
278964' 09/23/93 000283 FIRSTAX (]RS)
278964 09/23/93 00028~ FIRSTAX (iRS)
278964 09/23/93 000283 FIRSTAX (]RS)
278964 09/23/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
278964 09/2]/9] 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
278964 09/2]/9] 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
278964 09/23/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
278964 09/23/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
278964 09/2]/93 00028] FIRSTAX (IRS)
278964 09/23/93 000283 FIRSTAX (iRS)
278964 09/23/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
278964 09/2]/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
000283 FEDERAL 001-2070
00028~ FEDERAL 100-2070
000283 FEDERAL 190-2070
000283 FEDERAL 191-2070
00028~ FEDERAL 193-2070
00028~ FEDERAL 300-2070
000283 FEDERAL 320-2070
000283 FEDERAL 330-2070
O002B~ NEDICARE 001-2070
000283 HEDICARE 100-2070
000283 HEDICARE 190-2070
000283 NEDICARE 191-2070
000283 NEDICARE 193-2070
000283 NEDICARE 300-2070
000283 NEDICARE 320-2070
000283 NEDICARE 330-2070
9,794.78
2,477.0~
2,037.71
76.16
2~9.25
84.50
247.11
76.95
2,301.33
549.60
517.14
15.21
59.01
19.23
45.02
45.58
18,585.62
11981 09/23/93
TENECULA VALLEY AMERICA KEY REFUND/TEN VLY AMER 190-2900
40.00
40.00
11982 09/23/93
1198] 09/23/93
MERRICK, LYNN
DUNCAN, GREG
TCSD REFUND/NERRIEK, LY 190'183'4982
TCSO REFUND/DUNCAN, GRE 190-183-4982
40.00
80.00
40.00
80.00
11984 09/23/93
119~""~9/23/93
KNOTT, JODY TCSO REFUND/KNOTT, JODY 190'183-4982
MOJZCA, JOSE **CLAIM ~77/NOJICA 300-199-999-5207
80.00
459.69
80.00
159.69
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA
09/23/93 16:29 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE. NUMBER NANE DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
;T
11986 09/23/93 ROBINSON, KAREN REFUND/ROBINSON 190-183-6982
11987 09/23/93 BENNETT, DONALD REFUND/BENNETT 190; 183-4982
11988 09/23/93 DOgN]NG, JULZ REFUND/DOUN]NG 190-183-4.982
50.00
50.00
25.00
50.00
50.00
25.00
11989 09/23/93 000102 AMERICAN FENCE COMPANY SPORTS PARK/TEMPORARY F 190-180-999-5238
145.00
145.00
11990 09/23/93 000107 ALHAMBRA GROUP
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 100-164-999-5248
900.00
900.00
11991 09/23/93 000127 CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL
11991' 09123/93 000127 CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL
PUBLIC NOTICES 001-120-999-5256
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN 001-161-999-5256
34.85
40.27
75.12'
11992 09/23/93 000129 CAL tIEST RENTAL CENTER RENTAL EOUIP.
11992 09/23t93 O00129 CAL WEST RENTAL CENTER RENTAL EQUIP.
190-180-999-5238
190-180-999-5238
9.70
9.70
19.40
11993 09/Z~/93 000131 CARL WARREN & CO. KIRSCH/7/14/93 300-199-999-5205
11993 09/23/93 000131 CARL WARREN & CO. NOJICAITIZ1193 300-199-999-5205
98.13
98.13
196.26
11994 09/23/93 000143 COPY LINE CORPORATION MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 3~0-199-999;5217
11995 09/23/93 000155 DAVLIN VIDEO/AUDIO TAPE 001-100-999-5250
11996 09/23/93 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS 1339-1107-3/NAIL 001-110-999-5230
11997 09/23/93 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO TITLE REPORT 190:180-999-5250
2,180.32
701.67
15.25
400.00
2,180.32
,2A~67
,.J~25
600.00
11998 09/23/93 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST CUMPANY OCT-SEPT FILLER #934 001-161-999-5220
11998 09/23/93 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST CUMPANY STORAGE BINDERS #10/,45 001-161-999-5Z20
11998 09/Z3/93 O0O170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FREIGHT 001-161-999-52Z0
11998 09/23/93 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST CUMPANY TAX 001-161-999-52Z0
39.~
13.90
4.71
65.46
11999 09/23/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT B4-95523; NAMEBADGE HOL 001-120-999-5220
11999 09/23/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT B6-95523; NAMEBADGE HOL 001-110-999-5220
11999 09/23/93 O00177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT B6-95523; NAMEBADGE HOL 001-160-999-5220
11999 09/23/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 1~-95523; NAMEBADGE HOL 001-161-999-5220
11999 09/23/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT B4-95523; NAMEBADGE HOL 001-162-999-5220
11999 09/23/93 000177 GLENNZES OFFICE PRODUCT B~-95523; NAMEBADGE HOL 001-163-999-5220
11999 09/23/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT B6-95523; NAMEBADGE HOL 001-150-999-5220
11999 09/23/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT B~-95523; NAMEBADGE HOL 190-180-999-5220
11999 09/23/93 000177 GLENN[ES OFFICE PRODUCT TAX 001-120-999-5220
11999 09/23/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT TAX 001-110-999-5220
11999 09/23/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT TAX 001-160-999-5220
11999 09/23/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT TAX 001-161-999-5220
11999 09/23/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT TAX 001-162-999-5220
11999 09/23/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT TAX 001-150-999-5220
11999 09/23/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT TAX 190-180-999-5220
11999 09/23/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT TAX 001-163-999-5220
11999 09/23/93 OOO177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT PRONG FASTENER 001-161-999-5220
11999 09/23/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT WIRE LEGAL TRAY 001-161-999-5220
5.62
5.62
5.62
5.62
'5.62
5.62
5.62
5.66
.4~,
.6~,
'.44
.44
.41
6.25
9.95
VOUCHRE2
09/23,f""' 16:29
CiTY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUIIER NAE DESCRIPTION NIJ~ER
iTEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AleXINT
12000 09/23/93
12000 09/23/93
12000 09123193
000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE C2787 LASERJET Illsi TO 320-19~-999-5221
000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE FREIGHT 320-1~-~-5221
0001~2 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE TAX 320-1~-~-5221
12001 09/23/93 000194 ICHA RETIREHENT 000196 DEF CONP 001-2080
12001 09/23/93 000194 lc~ RETIREMENT 00019~ DEF COW> 100-2080
12001 09/23/93 000196 ICNA RETIREHENT 00019~ DEF COle 190-2080
12001 09/23/93 000194 ICNA RETIREMENT 000196 DEF COMP 191-2080
12001 09/25/93 000194 ICNA RETIREMENT 000192~ DEF.COIqP 193-2080
12001 09/2]/93 000194 ICNA RETIREMENT 00019/, DEF CONP 300-2080
12001 09/23/93 000196 ICMA RETIREFENT 000196 DEF CONP 330-2080
341.97
9.85
26.97
!,715.13
56/,. 16
696.96
34.08
61.66
25.37
50.00
378.7~
2,927.36
12002 09/2]/93 000204 J.R. FREEIN CO, INC. INSPECT CITY TYPEUR]TER 360-199-999-5212
12002 09/2]/93 000204 J.R. FREEIN CO, INC. INSPECT CITY TYPEgRITER 360-199-999-5212
12003 09/2]/93 000206 KINKO'S COPIES COPIES 001-161-999-5222
12004 09/2]/93 000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING 8 BOX LUNCHES 001-100-999-5260
350.00
350.00
62.97
50.00
700.00
62.97
50.00
12005 09/23/93 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS QUICK PRINTING OF NEIGHBORHO0 001-170-999-5222
296.16
294.16
1200J,--09/23/93 000238 FINAL TOUCH MARKETING
120 9/23/93 000238 FINAL TOUCH MARKETING
FY 93-96'; MARKETING PR 280-199-999-526~
FY 93-96'; MARKETING PR 280-199-999-5266
80.81
2,686.71
2,565.52
12007 09/23/93 000263 PAYLESS DRUG STORE FILM PROCESSING 190-180-999-5250
12008 09/2]/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000266 PER REDE 001-2130
12008 09/23/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000266 PER REDE 100-2130
lZ008 09/2]/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RET[REM 000266 PERS RET 001-2390
12008 09/23/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RET[REN 000266 PERS RET 100-2390
12008 09/23/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000266 PERS RET 190-2390
12008 09/23/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RET[REM 000266 PERS RET 191-2390
12008 09/23/93 0002~6 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000266 PERS RET 193-2390
12008 09/23/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000266 PERS RET 300-2]90
12008 09/2]/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000266 PERS RET 320-2390
12008 09/2]/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000266 PERS RET 330-2390
12008 09/2]/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000266 SURVIVOR 001-2390
12008 09/2]/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES-' RETIREM 000266 SURVIVOR 100-2390
12008 09/2]/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RET/REM 000266 SURV]VOR 190-2390
12008 09/23/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REM 000266 SURVIVOR 191-2390
12008 09/23/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000266 SURVIVOR 193-2390
12008 09/23/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000266 SURVIVOR 300-2]90
12008 09/23/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000266 SURVIVOR 320-2390
12008 09/23/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REN 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2]90
107.35
107.35
11,222.85
2,42].61
2,053.50
75.77
279.14
2]2.35
226.03
51.17
11,61
11.16
,62
1.~,
.~6
'1.86
16,899.00
12009 09/23/93 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH TCSD 190-180-999-5212
12009 09/23/93 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH TCSD 190-180-999-5222
12009 09/23/93 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH TCSD 190-180-999-5250
12009 09/2]/93 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH CiTY 190-180-999-5260
12009 09/23/93 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH TCSD 190-18]-999-5370
12C ~9/23/93 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH TCSD 190-183-999-5320
9.62
51.01
10.13
16.59
12.61
-10.00
VOUCHRE2 PAGE
09/23/93 16:29 ~
CITY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERICOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUNBER DATE NUIIER
VENDOR
NANE
ITEH
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUNBER
ITElq
AleOUNT
CHECK
AMOUIIT
12009 09/2~/93 000249
12009 09/23/93 000269
12009 09/23/93 000269
12009 09123193 000269
12009 09/23/93 000249
12009 09/23/93 000269
12009 09/23/93 000269
12009 09/23/93 000269
12009 09/23/93 000269
12009 09/23/93 000269
12009 09/23/93 000269
12009 09/23/93 000269
12009 09/23/93 000249
12009 09/23/93 000269
12009 09/23/93 000269
12010 09/23/93 000253
12010 09/23/93 000253
12010 09/23/93 000253
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY*CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
POSTNASTER
POSTNASTER
POSTNASTER
PETTY CASH TCSD
PETTY CASH TCSD
PETTY CASH TCSD
PETTY CASH CITY
PETTY CASH CITY
PETTY CASH CITY
PETTY CASH CITY
PETTY CASH CITY
PETTY CASH CITY
PETTY CASH CITY
PETTY CASH CITY
PETTY CASH CITY
PETTY CASH CITY
PETTY CASH CITY
PETTY CASH CITY
EXPRESS HAlL/AUGUST
EXPRESS HAIL/AUGUST
EXPRESS HAIL/AUGUST
190-183-999-5320
190-1ES-999-5360
001 - 100-999-5258
001 - 100-999-5258
001-110-~q~-5260
001 - 160-999-5220
001 - 160-999-5260
001-140-~-5261
001 - 161-9~9-5260
001-16~-~9~-5260
001 - 150-~-5260
280-199-999-5264
320-199-~99-5220
320-19~-999-5221
330-199-999-5220
001-160-999-5230
320-199-~9~-5230
001-161-~-5230
62.~8
32.98
60.19
16.~
13.00
7.69
15.00
15.00
18.76
13.00
37.00
8.75
2.69
9.89
8.00
19.90
9.95
23.90
411.13
53,75
12011 09/23/93 000255
12012 09/23/93 000262
12012 09/23/93 000262
12012 09/23/93 000262
12012 09/23/93 000262
12012 09/23/93 000262
12012 09/23/93 000262
PRO LOCK & KEY
RANCHO ~ATER
RANCHO MATER
RANCHO MATER
RANCHO MATER
RANCHO MATER
RANCHO MATER-
LOCKSHITH SERV.
MATER USAGE
MATER USAGE
MATER USAGE
MATER USAGE
MATER USAGE
MATER USAGE
190-180-~-5212
1~0-180-~-5260
190-180-~-5240
191-180-999-5260
193-180-~-5260
193-180-~9-5240
190-180-999-5260
7.51
107.~3
2,511.16
137.77
1,716.16
4,7V9.88
701.53
7.51
9,976.43
12013 09/23/93 000285
12013 09/23/93 000285
12013 09/23/93 000285
12013 09/23/93 000285
12013 09/23/93 000285
12013 09/23/93 000285
12013 09/23/93 000285
12014 09/23/93 000291
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY*
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T
500 BUSINESS CARDS; B/M 001-140-~99-5220
TAX 001-140-~-5220
8 BOXES OF B/M BUSINESS 001-161-~-5220
3 BOXES OF GOLD FOIL BU 001-161-~-5220
TAX 001-161-~9~-5220
5GO/BUSINESS CARDS; B/M 001-160-~-5220
TAX 001-140-~q-5220
REPAIR & HAINT..CITY VE 310-180-999-5214
27.71
2.15
221.60
108.00'
25.55
27.70
2.15
414.86
12015 09/23/93 000303 SYSTEH 2/90
12015 09/23/93 000303 SYSTEH 2/90
12015 09/23/93 000303 SYSTEH 2/~0
12015 09/23/93 000303 SYSTEN 2/90
12015 0~/23/93 000303 SYSTEN 2/90
12015 09/23/93 000303 SYSTEN 2/90
PL75 3/4'; OSB ~60-199-~'5242
2X84 PANEL NOUNT OF) NA 001'120'9~'5220
FREIGHT ~0-199-~99-5262
FREIGHT 001-120-999-5220
TAX ~0-199-~-5262
TAX 001-120-~-5220
~.83
21.60
2.00
2.00
2.19
2.18
64.80
12016 09123193 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY
12016 09/23/93 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY
POOL TROPHIES
GOLF TOURN AMARDS
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
36.79
256.54
293.33
12017 09/23/93 000322
12017 09/23/93 000322
UNIGLOBE BUTTERFIELD TR
UNIGLOBE GUTTERFIELD TR
LEAG CA CITIES CORF OCT
LEAG CA CITIES CORF OCT
001-100~~9~-5258
001-110-~9~-5258
202.00
101.00
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 5
09/23//-` 16:29
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR I TEN ACCOUNT'
NUNBE~R DATE NUMBER N/~E DESCRZPTZOR NUMBER
12017 09/73/93 000322 UNIGLOBE BUTTERFIELD TR AIRLINE/FLOR[DA/NUNOZ 001-100-999-5258
.12017 09/73/93 000322 UNIGLOBE BUTTERFIELD TR AIRLINE/SAN FRAN/DIXOR 001-110-999-5258
ITEM
AMOUNT
333.50
281.00
CHECK
AffiIUNT
917.50
12018 09/73/93 000325 UNITED gAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UIJ 001-2120
12O18 09/23/93 000325 UNITED gAY OF THE INLAN 000325 rig 190-2120
12019 09/23/93 000326 UMITOG RENTAL SERVICE 2 SETS OF UNIFORMS CLEA 100-166-999-5243
12019 09/23/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE STERLING & REED UNIFORM 190-180-999-5243
12019 09/23/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE FLOOR MAT SERVICES; CIT ~0-199-999-5250
87.00
17.50
68.05
13.60
3~.50
10~.50
116.15
12020 09/23/93 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILL] 'CLEAR XEROX TRANSPARENC 330-199-999-5220
12020 09/23/93 000~5 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI TAX 330-199-999-5220
104.50
8.10
112.60
12021 09/23/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR 909-202-4752 AUG SN 190-180-999-5208
12021 09/73/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALZF TELEPHON 909-202-4753 AUG BH 190-180-999-520B
12021 09/23/93 000375 SOUTHERN CAL[F TELEPHON 989-202-4754 AUG KH 190-180-999-5208
12021 09/23/95 000375 SOUTHERN CAL[F TELEPHOR 909-202-4755 AUG VAN 190-180-999-5208
12021 09/23/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909-202-4756 AUG TH 320-199-999-5208
12021 09/23/95 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPIION 909-202-4757-AUG JG 001-120-999-5208
12021 09/2~/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPffiIN 909-202-4758 AUG RR 001-100-999-5208
12021 09/23/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909-202-4762 AUG RP 001-100-999-5208
120.2/1.-~9/23/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909-202-476~ AUG PB 001-100-999-5208
120; )/23/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON 909-202-4769 AUG JS 001-100-999-5208
1202'~ d9/23/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909-202-4770 AUG O0 001-110-999-5208
12021 09/23/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON 909-202-4204 tie 001-110-999-5208
12021 09/23/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR 909-202-4751/TS 100-164-999-5208
12021 09/23/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909-202-4760 POOL 190-180-999-5208
12021 09/23/93 000375 SOUTHERN CAL]F TELEPHOR 909-202-4761SM 001-100-999-5208
12021 09/23/93 000375 SOUTHERN CAL]F TELEPNOR 909-202-4764 JH 100-164-999-5208
12021 09/23/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909-202-4765/BB 100-164-999-5208
86.98
45.65
42.69
~4.91
50.30
37.35
~.18
76.98
45.64
41.14
216.55
57.25
74.69
332.04
165.94
60.40
82.97
1,505.66
12022 09/73/93 000377 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT 0 JUNE SERV. 100-164-999-5405
12023 09/73/93 000389 USCH/PEBSCO, COBRA) 000389 PT RET]R 001-2160
12023 09/73/93 000389 USCH/PEBSCO, (OBRA) 000)89 PT RETIR 100-2160
12023 09/23/93 000389 USCM/PEBSCO, COBRA) 000389 PT RET]R 190-2160
12024 09/23/93 000393 CALIFORNIA ASSOC. OF PA ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP/HARTL 190-180-999-5226
105.60
17.28
96.00
238.08
100.00
105.60
351.36
100.00
12025 09/23/93 000408 AGR[CREDIT ACCEPTANCE C OCT TRACTOR LEASE
190-180-999-5239
8~6.02
646.02
12026 09/23/93 000428 HORIZON MATER ~ATER 9/7 190-182-999-5240
58.60
58.6O
12027 09/23/93 000447 CONTRONIX OF HEMET EXTERNAL SPEAKERS FOR T 190-180-999-5242
12027 09/23/93 000447 CONTRORIX OF HENET LABOR - INSTALLATION 190-180-999-5250
12027 09/23/93 000447 COHTRONIX OF HEMET TAX 190-180-999-5242
135.00
100.00
10.46
245.46
12028 09/23/93 000448 MOORE BUSINESS FORMS PURCHASE ORDER FORMS;5- 001-140-999-5222
12028 09/23/93 000448 NODRE BUSINESS FORMS FREIGHT 001-140-999-5222
12028 09/23/93 000448 ~3ORE BUSINESS FORMS TAX 001-140-999-5222
527.98
18.29
40.92
587.19
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 6
09/23/93 16: 29 "'~.
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
12029
12030
12031
12031
12031
12032
12033
12034
12035
12035
12035
12036
12036
12036
12037
12038
12039
12039
12039
12039
12039
12040
12041
12042
12043
12043
120~
12044
12045
12046
12047
120~7
12047
CHECK
DATE
0~/23/93
0~12319~
0~12~193
091231~
09/23/93
09/23/f3
09/23/93
09/23/93
09/23/93
09/2~/93
09/23/93
09/23/93
09~23~93
09/23/93
09123193
09/23/93
09/23/93
09/23/93
09/23/93
09/23/93
09/23/93
09/23/93
09/23/93
09/23/93
09/23/93
09/23/93
09/23/93
09/23/93
09/23/93
09/23/93
09/23/93
09123193
09/23/93
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
000486 CA. NUNI.BUSINESS TAX A
000510 AMERICAN BRISTOL INDUST
000534 A,F. JOHNSON CO., INC,
000534 A.F. JOHNSOR CO,, INC,
000534 A,F. JOHNSON CO,, INC.
000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
00057'~ APOLLO SMEEP]NG, ]NC.
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOO$
ITEM ACCOUNT
DESCRIPTION NUMBER
BUS LIC CONFERENCE
COUPLINGS/ADAPTER
275 BTF 275 AHS XL
275 BTF 275 AHS L
TAX
08/01-08/~1/93
001-140-999-5261
001-171-999-5242
100-16~-999-5218
100-16~-999-5218
100-164-999-5218
191-180-9~9-5319
SWEEPING "EMERGENCY RES 100-164-999-5402
000611 TEXACO REFINING & HARE FUEL/CM
JANAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC
JANAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC
JANAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC
000619
000619
000619
000649 NUNOZ, SAL J.
00064.9 NUNOZ, SAL J.
000649 ~JNOZ, SAL J.
000676 AUTUMOTIVE SPECIALTIES
000680 ANS-TNS
A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI
A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI
A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI
A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI
A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI
000~4
000~4
O00R4
000~4
000~4
000745 AT & T - CELLULAR
000747 PLANNERS BOOKSTORE
000751 SKILLPATH, INC.
000907 TEMECULA CAR WASH
000907 TEMECULA CAR WASH
000993 FREEDOM COFFEE, INC.
000993 FREEDOM COFFEE, INC.
001028 MEYER, CHUCK
001030 MINI-GRAPHIC SYSTEMS, I
001-110-999-5262
RACK-200 DMI WITH SENSO
PANCORN SOFTWARE INCLUD
CORP.
100-164-999-5610
100-164-999~5610
100-164-999-5610
'EXPENSE REIMB/CONF.
EXPENSE REIMB/CONF
EXPENSE REIMB/CONF
001-100-999-5260
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
ADDED WIRING NEEDED FOR 100-16~-999-5215
POSTAGE FOR METER
330-199-999-5230
SATIN AWARDS JACKETS
TAX
T-SHIRTS (3) L, (6) XL
T-SHIRTS XXL
TAX
190-183-999-5380
190-183-999-5380
190-183-999-5380
190-183-999-5380
190-183 -999- 5380
619-987-1828 MJ
001-140-999-5208
AFFORDABLE HOUSING PUBL 001-q61-999-5228
CONFERENCE/OCT 25
001-162-999-5258
WASH
WASH/MERCHANDISE
310-180-999-5214
310-110-999-5214
COFFEE SERVXCE; CITY HA 340-199-999-5250
COFFEE SERVICE; CITY HA 340-199-9~-5250
CABLE INSTALLAT]ON (CRC 250-190-129-580~
STORAGE BOXES
001065' USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065
001065 USOM/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065
001065 USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065
001-120-999-5220
DEF CONP
DEF COMP
DEF CUMP
001-2080
100-2080
190-2080
ITEM
AMOUNT
90.00
29.36
287.54
52.28
26.33
5,307.51
65.00
69.53
575.00
150,00
65.19
54.00
167.59
149.19
106.69
1,728.05
450.00
72.81
26.76
7.72
5.87
5.00
99.00
4.00
21.77
37.51
70.64
400.00
60 34
3,090.69
222.98
E36.32
CHECK
N~ffitJNT
90.00
29.~
3~.15
5,307.51
65.00
69.53
~0.19
3~.~
1,728.05
592.17
5.~
5.~
~.00
25.~
108.15
400.~
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 7
09/Z3/"' 16:2~
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUNBER DATE
12047 09/23/~J
12047 09123193
· 12048 09123193
120~9 09/23/93
120~9 09/23/93
12050 09/23/93
12051 09/23/93
12052 09/23/93
12053 09/23/93
12054 09123193
CITY OF TERECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER'iOOS
VENDOR VENDOR ITEN
NUNBER NANE DESCRIPTION
001065 USCR/PEBSCO (DEF. CORP. 001065 DEF CONP
001065 USCN/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065 DEF CONP
001072
RANK OF ANERICA NT & SA TRUST 602(33 DEBT SERVIC
001088 RORY RIECK TRACTOR k~3RK ~IEED ABATERENT CONTRACT
001088 RORY RIECK TRACTOR
001103 FREEDON NATERIALS
001122 SCOTCH PAINT CORPORATIO
001136 LA VERNE, CITY OF
001137 SCULLIN, C, RICHAEL
001139 CHIP NORTON PHOTOGRAPHY
TRACTOR SERVICE
1 YARD 5 SACK CONCRETE
PAINT
CSNFO SO CHAPTER NEETIN
EXCAVATION & GRADING CO
SLIDES
TOTAL CHECKS
ACCOUNT
NUNBER
300-2080
320-2080
780-1040
001-162-999-5~.0
001 - 162-999-5/~0
100-164-999-5218
100-164-999-5218
001-140-999-5258
001-163-999-5228
001 - 100-999-5258
ZTER
ANOUHT
3.A7
312.50
210,7'88.98
2,865.00
4,210.00
131./.6
13.90
40.00
34.00
~,.48
CHECK
ANOUNT
+3,865.96
210,788.98
7,075. O0
131.46
13.90
40.00
34.00
301,523.83
VOUCHRE2
09/30/93
15:21
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 CONNUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
210 CAPITAL INPROVENENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPHENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FUND
320 INFORHATION SYSTENS
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL
ANOUNT
3~,856.53
2,996.04
4,149.92
337.41
66,687.56
1,055.00
450.38
322.19
27.00
~,~3.07
140,543.10
VOUCHRE2
09/3(T"~ 15:21
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
12055 09/2/*/93
12056 09/2/*/93 000756
12056 09/2/*/93 000756
12056 09/24/93 000756
12056 09/2/*/93 000756
12056 09/2/*/93 000756
12060 09/30/93
12061 09/30/93
12062 09/30/93
12063 09/30/93
12064 09/30/93
12065 09/30/93
12066 09/30/93
124 )9/30/93
12068 09/30/93
12069 09/30/93
12070 09/30/93
12070 09/30/93
12071 09/30/93 000120
12072 09/30/93 000123
12072 09/30/93 000123
12072 09/30/93 000123
12073 09/30/93 000127
12073 09/30/93 000127
1207/* 09/30/93 000131
12075 09/30/93 000155
12075 09/30/93 000155
12076 09/30/93 000170
12076 09/30/93 000170
12076 09/30/93 000170
12076 09/30/93 000170
1207~ 09/30/93 000170
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR
NAME
TENECULA VALLEY AMER LE
IPS SERVICES, INC.
IPS SERVICES, INC.
IPS SERVICES, INC.
IPS SERVICES, INC.
IPS SERVICES, INC.
RANDAZZO, LEONI
RANCHO PLAZA SHOE REPAI
SIMMONS, SHEZLA
SCHUG, DOREEN
OROSCO, LOREAL
JORDAN, BART
CHARLES, GABRIELA
NORRISOR, COLEEN
GONSNAN, GEORGEANNE
KINDA. NANCY
KILLEEN, TIMOTHY
KILLEEN. TIMOTHY
BICKNELL TRAVEL CENTER
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
REFUND DEPOSIT/TEN VLY
GRADING AND PARKING POR
IPS SERVICES. INC.
GRADING & PAVING
CREDIT MEMO/CHANGE ORDE
CREDIT MEMO/RETENTION
TCSD REFUND/RANDAZZO
REFUND/RANCHO PLAZA SHO
TCSD REFUND/SI!~S
TCSD REFUND/SCHUG
TCSD REFUND/OROSCO
JORDAN/REFUND
TCSD REFUND/CHARLES
REFUND/NORRISON
REFUND/GONSMAN
REFUND/KINDA
REFUND/KILLEEN
REFUND/KILLEEN
TRAVEL/LEAGUE CA CITIES
BURICE glLLIAMS & SORENS DUE ON INVOICE
BURKE WlLLIAMS & SORENS DUE ON INVOICE
BURKE WlLLIAMS & SORENS DUE ON INVOICE
CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL
CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN
CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOT
CARL WARREN & CO.
NODAFFARE/DOL 08/1/*/91
DAVLIN AUDIO TAPE; PLANNING
DAVLIN VIDEO/AUDIO TAPE
FRANKLIN QUEST CONPANY
FRANKLIN GUEST COIqPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COHPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST CONPANY
199/* DAY TIMER REFILL C
199/* STORAGE BINDER - T
BUSINESS CARD HOLDERS
FREIGHT
TAX
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-2900
210-199-801-5804
210-199-801-5804
210-199-801-5804
210-199-801-5804
210-2035
190-183-/.982
001 - 199-/,056
190-183-/,982
190 - 183 -/*982
190-183-/.982
190-183-/.982
190-183-/.982
190-1lG-/.982
190-18~-/.982
190-183-/.982
190-183-/.982
190-183-/.982
001 - 161-999-5272
001-130-999-52/,6
001-130-999-52/.6
190-180-999-52/.6
001-161-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
300 - 199- 999- 5205
001-161-999-5250
001 - 100-999-5250
001 - 163-999-5220
001 - 163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001 - 163-999-5220
001-163-999-5720
ITEM
AMOUNT
40.00
73,999.65
31,639.18-
22,517.93
2,500.00-
6,237.84-
35.00
19.00
19.00
35.00
70.00
19.00
57.00
19.00
70.00
80.00
305.00
1,72~.10
.2,136.09
169.45
367.~
220.38
150.00
516.32
259.35
6.g5
12.00
15.50
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOLINT
56,1/.0.56
35.00
19.00
19.00
35.00
70.00
19.00
57.00
19.00
150.00
305.00
/*,359,67
516.89
220.38
666.32
316,57
VOUCHRE2
09/30/93
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
12077
12077
12077
12077
12077
12077
12077
12078
12078
12078
12078
12078
12078
12078
12078
1207~
12080
12080
12081
12082
12082
12082
12082
1.2083
12084
.12084
12084
12084
12084
12085
12085
12086
12087
12088
12089
12009
12089
12089
12089
15:21
CHECK
DATE
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
0~/)0/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09130193
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
000176
000176
000176
000176
000176
000176
000176
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000184
000214
000216
000224
000228
000228
000228
000228
000266
000280
000280
0.00280
O0028O
000280
000285
000285
000291
0002~
000307
000320
000320
000320
000320
000320
VENDOR
NAME
GET PAGED
GET PAGED
GET PAGED
GET PAGED
GET PAGED
GET PAGED
GET PAGED
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT'
GLENN]ES OFFICE PRQOUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENN]ES OFFICE PRQOUCT
GLENN]ES OFFICE PRCOUCT
GLENN]ES OFFICE PRQOUCT
GTE
LUNCH & STUFF CATERING
LUNCH & STUFF CATERING
MELAD & ASSOCIATES
MOBIL
MOBIL
MOBIL
MOBIL
RIGHTHAY
SC SIGNS
SC SIGNS
SC SIGNS
SC SIGNS
SC SIGNS
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T
STRACHOTA INSURANCE
TEMECULA TROPHY
TOt4N CENTER STATIONERS
TOte'N CENTER STATIONERS
TOgN CENTER STATIONERS
TOt, iN CENTER STATIONERS
TO~N CENTER STATIONERS
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REG]STER
FOB ALL PER]OBS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
1-POLICE DEPT. PAGER
1-POLICE DEPT. PAGER
1-POLICE DEPT. PAGER
PAGER RENTAL
PAGERS B&S
PAGER RENTAL FOR ONE YE
5 PAGERS;PUBLIC WORKS D
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
MlSC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES;
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
M[SC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
NISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
909-699-2675 pU
CC DINNERS
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
PLAN CK FEE
FUEL
FUEL
FUEL
FUEL
SEPT RENT
PLANNING SIGNS
CITY CLERK SIGNS
AUGUST SIGNS POST[NGS
SIGNS CITY CLERK
PLANNING SIGNS
500/BUSINESS CARDS; GOL
TAX
REPAIR & NAINT. CITY VE
POLICY CHANGES
SPONSOR APPRECIATION PL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
FILTER PADS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-170-~-5262
001-160-~-5250
100-164-~-5238
1~0-180-~-52)8
001-162-~-52)8
320-1~-~-52)8
100-1(~-FR-52)8
001-160-~q~-5220
001-160-~-5220
001-160-~-5220
001-162-~-5220
1~0-180-~-5220
190-180-~-5220
001-160-~-5220
001-160-~-5220
100-1&~-~-5208
001-100-~-5260
001-100-~-5260
001-162-~-5268
320-1~-~-5262
001-161-~-5262
001-162-~-5263
190-180-~-5263
lO0-164-F~-52)8
001-161-~-5256
001-120-~-52~
001-161-~-5256
001-120-~-52~4
001-161-~-5256
1~0-180-~-5220
1~0-180-~q9-5220
310-164-999-5216
)00-1~-~-520~
001-2172
001-143-~-5220
001-163-~-5220
1~0-180-~-5220
lq0-180-~-5220
190-180-~-5220
ITEM
AMOUNT
10,~
10.~
11,02
88,00
33, O0
11,00
55,00
40 ,~
8,92
12,FJ
16,85
134,12
34,07
52,72
39,87
23,60
15,00
80,00
360. O0
16,00
16,00
25,85
58,52
57.39
180,00
90.OO
135.00
65.O0
45.00
36.00
35.56
230.00
488.17
161.66
6.91
48.68
16.38
-32,26
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
220,00
340.47
23.60
95,00
too
114.37
57.39
695,00
38.79
35.56
230.00
488.17
VOUCHRE2
09/30/''' 15:21
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR *ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUIqBER NAME DESCRIPT]OR
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
iTEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
12089 09/30/93 000320
12089 09/30/93 000320
12090 09/30/93 000326
12090 09/30/93 000326
TO~N CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES
TOI~N CENTER STAT]ORERS STENO BOOK
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
KIRK & CURALL UNIFORMS
STERLING & REED UNIFORM
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
100-16~-999-5243
190-180-999-5243
12091 09/30/93 000340 WHITE CAP BOOT BUCKLE 100-164-999-5243
12091 09/30/93 0003~0 tlITE CAP MISC SUPPLIES 100-16~-99q-5242
12091 09/30/93 0003~0 MHITE CAP MlSC SUPPLIES 100-164-999-5242
12091 09/30/93 0003~0 WHITE CAP TAX 100-164-999-5242
12091. 09/30/93 0003~0 WHITE CAP STEEL TOE BOOT 100-16A-999-5243
12091 09/30/93 0003~0 WHITE CAP BOOT BUCKLE 100-164-999-5242
BALANCE DUE OR INVOICE
12092 09/30/93 000341 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES
12093 09/30/93 000342
WINDSOR PARTNERS - RANC OCTOBER RENT
12094 09/30/93 000358 DIXON, DAVID F. ICI~ CORF REIMB
001-2030
3~0-199-999-523~
001-110-999-5258
12095 09/30/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909-202-4759 TE JULY 001-162-999-5208
12095 09/30/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909-202-/.759 AUG TE 001-162-999-5208
1209-L-09/30/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909-202-/.767 AUG GT 001-161-999-5208
120~ 09/30/93 000377 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT 0 JULY 93 100-164-999-5/*05
72.01
11.77
2~.00
13.60
?.3.11
110.00
11.25
95.90
23.11
9,989.29
29,798.92
590.51
42.13
56.67
56.12
67.76
347.27
36.60
272.77
9,989.29
29,798.92
590.51
154.92
~.~
12097 09/30/93 000/,27. ARTESIA IMPLEMENT REPAIR
310-180-999-5214
168.59
168.59
12098 09/30/93 000/*47 COMTROBIX OF HEMET SPG-15R SPECO SPEAKER 001-162-999-5335
12098 09/30/93 0013~/.7 CONTRONIX OF HEMET LABOR TO INSTALL 4 SPEA 001-162-999-5335
12098 09/30/93 000447 COHTRONIX OF HEMET TAX 001-162-999-5335
270.00
200.00
20.93
/*90.93
12099 09/30/93 000478 FAST SIGNS 36 SPONSOR SIGNS FOR GO 190-180-999-5301
12099 09/30/93 00D~78 FAST SIGNS 36 SPONSOR SIGNS FOR GO 001-2172
12100 09/30/93 000501 INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE NEliERSHIP DUES 001-120-999-5226
150.00
315.~8
465 ./.8
12141 09/30/93 000523 E.M.W.D. SERVICE FEES FOR PALA P 210-190-120-5802
12142 09/30/93 000545 PAC TEL CELLULAR - S.D. SD 1075255091593 001-1/.0-999-5208
8,504.OO
187.5/*
8,504.OO
187.5/*
12143 09/30/93 000571 CITY TRAFFIC ENG. ASSOC TRAFIC COMMISSIONERS ~R 001-163-999-5260
120.00
120.OO
12144 09/30/93 000580 PHOTO gORKS MISC. FILM AND PROCESSI 001-171-999-5250
12144 09/30/93 000580 PHOTO MORKS MISC. FILM ANO PROCESSI OO1-171-999-5250
12145 09/30/93 000587 MUNOZ, MARIO CUSTODIAN SERVICES/SENI 190-181-999-5250
25 .~
7.67
105.00
33.63
105.00
12146 09/30/93 000596 LEAGUE OF CA CITIES/LAF CORF REGISTRATION 001-161-999-5258
12146 09/30/93 000596 LEAGUE OF CA ClTIES/LAF CO!IF REGISTRATION 001-161-999-5272
12,"~ 09/30/93 00062~ BARB'S BALLOONING AFFAI DECORATIONS SENIOR CTR 190-181-999-5301
215.00
/*85.00
EO8.&O
700.00
208.60
VOUCHRE2
0913O193
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUHBER
12148
12149
12149
12149
12149
12150
12150
12150
12150
12150
12150
12150
12150
12151
12152
12153
12153
12153
12154
12155
12156
12157
12158
12159
12160
12161
12162
12163
12164
12165
12165
12166
12166
15:21
CHECK
DATE
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09130193
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09130193
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
09/30/93
VENDOR VENDOR
NtJHBER MANE
000~25 VOOS, CHARLES
0006/,5 SHART & FINAL
000645 SHART & F l MAL
000645' SHART & FINAL
000645 SMART & FINAL
00070/,
000704
000704
00070~
00070~
00070~
000704
00070/,
SKS, INC./INLAND OIL
SKS, INC./INLAND OIL
SKS, INC./INLAND OIL
SKS, INC./INLAND OIL
$XS, INC./INLAND OIL
SKS, INC,/INLAND OIL
SKS, INC./INLAND OIL
SKS, INC,/INLAND OIL
000846 N & 14 ASSOCIATION
000878 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
000907 TENECULA CAR MASH
000907 TEI4EOULA CAR gASH
000907 TE!4EOULA CAR MASH
000913 GOODHEM AI4BULANCE SERV!
000949 GKN RENTALS
O009~Z RAI4ONA TIRE
000993 FREEDOH COFFEE, INC.
001000 DROVER, CHRIS
001014 COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS
001030 141HI'GRAPHIC SYSTEI4S, l
0010~ REXOH, FREEDMAN, KLEPET
001057 PRO"SCAPE, ]NC..
0010~6 BOLAR# HIRSCH & JENNING
001119 HOUSTON PIPE CLEANING
001122 SCOTCH PAINT CORPORATIO
001122 SCOTCH PAINT CORPORATIO
001123 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPL]E
001123 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE
CITY OF TENEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEI4
DESCRIPTION
ICBO SEI41NAR IN MHITTER
141SC SUPPLIES
141SC SUPPLIES
141SC SUPPLIES
14ISC SUPPLIES
FUEL CHARGES
FUEL CHARGES
FUEL CHARGES
FUEL CHARGES
FUEL CHARGES
FUEL CHARGES
FUEL CHARGES
FUEL CHARGES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-162-9~-5258
190-182-g99-5301
190-180-999-5301
190-181-~-5301
190-181-~-5301
001-110-999-5262
190-180-999-5263
001-162-q~-5263
100-164-~-5263
100-164-ff9-5263
001-110-9~-5263
190-180-9~-5263
001-162-~-5263
MEI4BERSHZP DUES THRU 6/001-150-~-5226
DRAI~ ~
OIL CHANGES/CAR t~ASHES
OIL CHANGES/CAR t4ASHES
OIL CHANGES/CAR MASHES
STAND BY DURING FLOOD
1 DAY RENTAL FOR TRENCH
LUBE/CI4 VEHICLE
COFFEE SERVICE; CITY HA
ARCHAEOLOGICAL
SIGN FOR FRONT OF SENIO
APERTURE CARD & PLANETA
AUGUST SERVICES
ANNUAL LANDSCAPE .NAINTE
RDA CONSULTING
4 HRS. STORI4 DRAIN CLEA
5 GALLON RECYCLE PAINT
141SC. SUPPLIES FOR CLEA
SHALL HAND TOOLS ,FOR ST
TAX
001-1500
310-180-~-5214
310-110-9~-5214
310-164-~-5214
001-166-999-5465
100-164-~-5238
310-110-9~-5214
340-199-~-5250
001-161-~-5248
210-199-801-5804
001-120-~-5250
001-130-~-5246
191-180-~-5415
280-199-~-5248
100-164-~R-5401
100-164-9~-5218
100-164-999-5218
100-164-~-5242
100-164-999-5242
ITEI4
AKIUMT
138.24
59.66
187.39
155.39
15.96
61.59
115.83
63.56
399.25
367.39
20.63
52.78
36.82
350.00
8:542.95
19.35
12.00
60.26
1,140.00
132.00
26.43
64.15
4,3~5.00
215.35
706.30
337.41
155.00
540.00
26.94
116.26
8~6.81
-64.85
PAGE 4
CHECK
AHOUNT
1~8.24
418.40
1,117.85
350.00
8,542.~5
--~
.61
1,140. O0
132.00
26.43
64.15
4,345.00
993.00
'215.35
706.30
337.41
155.00
540.00
143.20
VOUCHRE2
09/30 ~"' 15: Z1
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUNBER DATE NI..It4BER NANE
121&7 09/30/93 001141 A ACE CONTRACTORS
12168 09/30/93 00114& SAN DIEGO CONFERENCE RE
12169 09/30/93 001147 IqURRIETA, CITY OF
12170 09/30/93 001148 *PALN DESERT~ CITY OF
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
[TEN
DESCRIPTION
SUPPLY & ]NSTALL S]NKS'
BUS & RETENT]ON EXPANSI
LABOR FORCE STUDY SHARE
INLAND LEAGUE/CA CITIES
ACCOUNT
Nt. IIER
210-!~-801-580~
001 - 140-9q~-5258
280-199-999-5264
001 - 110-99~- 5226
ITEN
850.00
3~5.00
900.00
100.00
PAGE' 5
CHECK
AI4OUNT
850.00
395,00
900.00
100.00
TOTAL CHECKS
140,543.10
VOUCHRE2
09/30/93
15:45
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
140 COINUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT
1gO COINUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD
280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - C/P
TOTAL
AMOUNT
7,062.81
28,13~.4&
17,2~3.74
3,448.39
19,247.10
1,&S&.39
81,537.80
VOUCHRE2
09/30'~' 15:45
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUHBER DATE NUHBER
12172 10/12/93 000135
12172 10/12/93 000135
12172 10/12/93 000135
12172 10/12/93 000135
12172 10/12/93 000135
12172 10/12/93 000135
12172 10/12/93 000135
12172 10/12/93 000135
12172 10/12/93 000135
12172 10/12/93 000135
12172 10/12/93 000135
12172 10/12/93 000135
12172 10/12/93 000135
12172 10/12/93 000135
12172 10/12/93 000135
12172 10/12/93 000135
12172 10/12/93 000135
12172 10/12/93 000135
1217'5 10/12/93 000217
1217/--10/12/93 000230
1217, 10/12/93 000238
12175 10/12/93 000238
12175 10/12/93 000238
12176 10/12/93 000251
12177 10/12/93 000270
12178 10/12/93 000406
12179 10/12/93 000754
12179 10/12/93 000754
12180 10/12/93 000820
12180 10/12/93 000820
12180 10/12/93 000820
12180 10/12/93 000820
12180 10/12/93 000820
12181 10/12/93 000883
12181 10/12/93 000883
12181 10/12/93 000883
12182 10/12/93 000979
12183 10/12/93 000980
12183 10/12/93 000980
121'~"'0/12/93 000980
VENDOR
NAME
CENTRAL CIT]ES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES S]GN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SiGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL C/TIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
MARGARITA OFFIC]ALS ASS
HUNt FiNANC]AL SERVICES
FINAL TOUCH HARKET]NG
FINAL TOUCH HARKET]NG
FINAL TOUCH NARKET]NG
PLANNING CENTER, THE
RJM DESIGN GROUP
RIVERS]DE COUNTY SHERIF
ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
ELL]OTT GROUP, THE
WINCHAK, KRIS
WINCHAK, KRIS
WINCHAK, KRIS
WINCHAK, KRIS
W]NCHAK, KRIS
MORTELEONE EXCAVATING
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
HONTELEONE EXCAVATING
DEL RiO ENTERPRISE
COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY
COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY
COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY
CITY OF TENEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REG/STER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEN
DESCR/PTZON
3/4" BANDIT BAND
3/4" BANDIT BUCKLES
BANDIT BRACKET
TAX
TAX'
CiTY LIMIT SIGNS
TAX
HUNICIPAL PRKNG.SGNS. 0
2 SPECIAL SIGNS FOR CIT
SM21B "FIRE STATION SYN
TAX
TYPE 1 BARRICADES WITH-
TYPE IIi BARRICADES 4~
TAX
W'37 "BUHP" 30" X 30"
MUNICIPAL PRKNG.SGNS. 0
WARNING FLAGS
TAX
ADULT SOFTBALL GAMES,
CSD ADMIN SERVICES
FY 93-94'; HARKETING PR
FY 93-94'; HARKET]NG PR
FY 93-94'; MARKETING PR
DEVELOPMENT CODE PROCES
RJN DESIGN GROUP
C~BG OLD TOMN BIKE PATR
LANDSCAPE REVIEW
LANDSCAPE REVIEW
CREDIT MENO/~ORK COHP
CREDIT MEHO/WC
KRIS WINCHAK MAP CHECKI
PLAN CHECKS
PREP OF LANDSCP MA[NT E
EXCAVATING SERVICES
EXTRA WORK ABOVE PC}
JOB # 93-94-17
MORK ORDER #93-94-34
IRRIGATION PARTS FOR LA
TAX
MISC SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
NUHBER
100-164-999-52~,
100-164-999-52/~,
100-164-999-52~.
100-164-999-52~,
100-164-999-52,f~.
100-164-999-524~.
100-164-999-52U,
100-164-999-5244
100-164-999-52~.
100-164-999-52~.
100-164-999-52/~.
100-164-999-5218
100-164-999-5218
100-164-999-5218
100-164-999-52~,
100-164-999-5244
100-164-999-52z~.
100-164-999-52z~.
190-183-999-5380
190-180-999-5370
280-199-999-5264
280-199-999-5264
280-199-999-5264
001-161-999-5248
250-190-129-5802
140-199-999-5281
001-161-999-5250
001-161-999-5250
001-1182
001-1182
001-163-999-5249
001-163-999-5249
190-180-999-5250
100-164-999-5401
100-164-999-5401
100-164-999-5402
100-164-999-5401
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
ITEM
AHOUNT
263.12
92.66
268.z~
48.37
20.20
900. O0
69.75
23 7.24
241.27
190.00
14.73
2,755.00
705. O0
268.15
67.21
97.92
58.08
4.50
2,508.00
1,502.28
736.11
781.19
169.09
2,757.73
19,247.10
4,664.91
1,880.00
1,650.00
99.57-
25.35-
625.00
275.00
1,890.00
6,000.00
200.00
3,200.00.
3,882.00
1,321.78
102.~
'P..~7.66
PAGE 1
CHECK
6,301.64
2,508.00
1,502.28
1,686.39
2,757.73
19,247.10
4,664.91
3,530.00
2,665.08
9,400.00
3,882.00
VOUCHRE2
09/30/93
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
12183
1218~.
12183
12183
12184
12185
12185
12185
12185
12186
12186
12186
12186
12186
12186
12186
12186
12186
12186
12186
12186
12186
12187
12187
12188
12188
12188
12189
12189
15:65
CHECK
DATE
10/12/93
10/12/93
10/12/93
10/12/93
10/12/93
10/12/93
10/12/93
10/12/93
10/12/93
10/12/93
10/12/93
10/12/93
10/12/93
10/12/93
10/12/93
10/12/93
10/12/93
10/12/93
10/12/9'5
10/12/93
10/12/93
10/12/93
10/12/93
10/12/93
10/12/93
10/12/93
10/12/93
10/12/93
10/12/93
VENDOR
NUI4BER
000980
000980
000960
000980
001007
001037
001037
001037
001037
001068
001068
001068
001068
001068
001068
001068
001068
001068
001068
001068
001068
001068
001080
001080
001084
00108/,
001084
001093
001093
VENDOR
NAME
COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY
COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY
COAST IRRIGATION ~UPPLY
COAST IRRIGATIOR SUPPLY
NELSON PAVING & SEALING
FALLBROOK LANDSCAPE & H
FALLBROOK LANDSCAPE & 14
FALLBROOK LANDSCAPE & 14
FALLBROOK LANDSCAPE & 14
14URRAY#S HOTEL & RESTAU
MURRAY'S HOTEL & RESTAU
NURRAY'S HOTEL & RESTAU
NURRAY~S HOTEL & RESTAU
NURRAY~S HOTEL & RESTAU
14URRAY#S HOTEL & RESTAU
NURRAY'S HOTEL & RESTAU
14URRAY~S HOTEL & RESTAU
14URRAY'S HOTEL & RESTAU
14URRAY'S HOTEL & RESTAU
14URRAY'S. HOTEL& RESTAU
14URRAY'S HOTEL & RESTAU
14URRAY'S HOTEL & RESTAU
BILLIARDS & BARSTOOLS
BILLIARDS & BARSTOOLS
RANCHO PAVING
RANCHO PAVING
RANCHO PAVING
FRAZEE PAINT
FRAZEE PAINT
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOO$
ITEM
DESCRXPTION
NZSC SUPPLIES
NISC SUPPLIES
NISC SUPPLIES
NISC SUPPLIES
INSTALL8 SPEED BlJiPS
SEPT. HA]NT
SEPT NAINT
SEPT HAINT
SEPT. NAINT
RE FR I GERATOR
TAX
G12010 TRAULSEN 1-DOOR
TAX
STEAl4 TABLE FOR SENIOR
TAX
STAINLESS STEEL 140RK TA
TAX
RESTRAUNT SUPPLIES
RESTRAUNT SUPPLIES
2T2D18; STAINLESS STEEL
HOT & COLD FAUCET
TAX
BILLARDS TABLE. CENTUR
TAX
BTt~N ~6,000 & 65,000 CL
ELINDA RD. N/O CALLE HA
REMOVE & DISPOSE HEEDS
SPEED FLOW P.T. SCOOT
TAX
ACCOUNT
NUHBER
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
100-166-999-5602
193-180-999-56i5
193-180-999-5615
193-180-999-5615
19]-180-999-5615
190-180-999-5610
190-180-999-5610
190-180-999-5610
190-180-999-5610
190-180-999-5610
190-180-999-5610
190-180-999-5262
190-180-999-5262
190-180-999-5262
190-180-999-5262
190-180-999-5610
190-180-999-5610
190-180-999-5610
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
100-164-999-5602
100-164-999-5602
100-164-999-5602
100-164~999-5610
1OO-164-999-5610
ITE14
A140UNT
126.57
66.53
377.65
75.67
5,192.OO
1,052.41
279.80
1,565.93
550.25
1,992.00
156.38
1,796.00
139.04
909.00
650.00
36.88
2??.66
222.32
435.00
105.00
41.85
2,285.00
177.00
250.00
382.50
600.00
2,159.00
167.32
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,305.90
5,192.00
3,~8.39
6,625.56
2,662.00
1,032.50
2,326.32
TOTAL CHECKS
81,537.80
ITEM
NO.
4
APPROV/~T.
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
October 12, 1993
Award of Annual Street Maintenance Contract
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council in accordance with the contract documents reject ell bids for the Annual
Street Maintenance Contract and direct staff to continue using the City's established
purchasing procedures modified as attached to perform daily street maintenance.
BACKGROUND:
On May 25, 1993 the City Council authorized the Public Works Department to solicit bids for
the implementation of an Annual Street Maintenance Program. The proposed project included
but was not limited to pothole patching, minor overlays, culvert cleaning, roadway shoulder
grading, sidewalk repair, and curb repair. 'The contract documents were in substantial
conformance with the project documents used during Fiscal Year 91-92 when the project was
last publicly bid. The Fiscal Year 91-92 contract provided for annual renewal of the contract
for a period of up to five (5) years by mutual consent of each party. Subsequently, the
maintenance contract was renewed for Fiscal Year 1992-93 with the original contractor,
subject to modifications agreed to by each party. However, in April of 1993 the original
contractor informed the Public Works Department that they could no longer meet their
contractual obligations. This action required the Public Works Department to follow the City's
established purchasing procedures (John Warner Road, Vallejo Culvert, Via Lobo access) to
perform daily maintenance work and request the City Council authorize solicitation of a Public
Works Bid for the Fiscal Year 1993-94 Maintenance Program.
During the bid process, concerns involving the provisions of the contract documents were
raised. As a result four (4) addendums were issued covering bond amounts, emergency work,
extra work, and the bid deposit. Additionally the bidding period was extended thirty (30) days
-and a pre-bid meeting was scheduled with all plan holders to clarify any areas of possible
misinterpretation. Minutes of that meeting are attached for your review.
pw I b'%egdflet',93%1012~tmaint.rej
A total of twelve (12) bid packets were sold during the advertising period and on August 5,
1993-the City Clerk opened the following bids at City Hall:
Cunningham-Davis Corporation, Fontana
Monteleone Excavating, Murrieta
Rancho Paving Contractors, Temecula
Charles Abbott and Associates, Torrance
An analysis of the unit prices revealed that the firm of Cunningham-Davis was low bid on 129
unit price items, followed by Rancho Paving Contractors with 62 low bid items. Due to the
lack of a clear cut apparent low bidder and the range of unit prices for the same item, staff
recommends that all bids be rejected. Staff considered the alternative of continuing the daily
Maintenance Program using the purchasing procedures necessitated by our Fiscal Year 1992-
93 contractor being unable to perform. This investigation revealed that since the majority of
our daily maintenance was being performed on a time and material basis it would be more
cost effective for the City to continue an informal bidding procedure for items under ~25,000,
and formulate specific Capital Improvement Projects consisting of a larger quantity of items
such as sidewalk or curb and gutter repair. This process would ensure that items such as
potholes or trench failures would be repaired immediately. However, those items such as
cracked sidewalk, cross gutter repair, or curb replacement would be prioritized end bid in such
a manner that this would be the only item of work. By bidding the projects in this manner,
the additional quantities and definite locations will enable a contractor to prepare a more cost
effective bid. Items that need immediate attention due to safety concerns can still be
addressed with the informal bidding procedures and not effect our current responsive system.
The current informal bidding procedure had been modified to sealed bids for all items between
$1,000 and $25,000. A copy of the revised procedure is attached for your review.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The FY93-94 budget includes $400,000 allocated in Account No. 5402 for street
maintenance, and $200,000 allocated in Account No. 5401 for drainage facilities
maintenance.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Planholder's List for Street Maintenance Bid
Pre-Construction Meeting Minutes including attendees
Unit Prices Spreadsheet
Correspondence from Cunningham-Davis
Addendum's No. I through 4
Modified Purchasing Procedures
pwl 5~egdrpt~,93~1012~etmeint.rej
.:::~";~ ,-.4 ,.-4 ~ _ q, ¢.(,. > ~ v--.._~._~.%.,.---~
J
k
CITY OF TEMECULA
STRF-nT MAINTENANCE CONTRACT
Contractors Pre-Bid Conference
July 20, 1993, 2:00 P.M.
City Hall Conference Room
Staff Present:
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Brad A. Buron,'Mainte-~nee Superintendent
Grant M. Yates, Financial Services Administrator
Anita Pyle, Admini-~trative Secretary
Kelli Gop~!es, Office Assistant
Contractors Present:
RAMTEK, Marcia Walton
CHARLES ABBO~F AND ASSOC., represented by John Whitman
RANCHO PAVING, Dan Naron and Ray DeAnda
DEL RIO ENTERPRL~ES, Lloyd Mullins and An ColWain
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING, Mike Monteleone Sr. & M'~ke Monteleone, Jr.
The meeting commenced at 2:00 p.m. on July 20, 1993.
Serlet:
Introduced Staff
(Self introduction by Contractors)
Reviewed Notice Inviting Bids, Item Nos. 2, 3, 6, the purpose of the street mnintennnce
contract, and the City's policies and procedures for the bidding process.
Clarified and explained: Item No. 1, pg. CA-I - Contract Docxlmen~
· Item No. 2, pg. CA-2 - Scope of Work
Item No. 4, pg. CA-2 - Contract Term
Item No. 10, pg. CA-3 - Waiver of Claims
Addendures read and explained:
Addendure No. I (Payment and Faithful Performance Bond)
Addendure No. 2 (Notice of Pro-Bid Meeting)
Addendum No. 3 (Yard elimir~ted, extra work, and e~e~gency work)
Sexier opens the floor to questions.
Lloyd Mullins, Del Rio, questioned where the overhead costs should be placed for traffic control.
Serlet responded that these costs should be placed in each individual unit price and that Iraffic conn'ol
should not be included as an additional cost.
John Whiunan, (representing CAA), inquired fithere were any other paperwork requiremere besides th~
work order.
Buron responded regarding the certified prevailing wage requirements, and that he needed a copy of the
certified payroll of prevailing wage for City work only.
John Whitman, (representing CAA), questioned Item 8, Page CA-3, Warranty Retention.
Buron responded that the reason for Item 8, Page CA-3 is because projects over $25,000 are classified
as special projects and/or out of the scope of work according to the contract.
Serlet responded that a public bid process may take place when monies over $2S,000 are involved. Serlet
also read Item No. 10, Waiver of Claims, and went over Item No. 20, Page CA-S, as an alternative.
Serle~ read aloud Item Nos. 21 and 23, Page CA-S, me~tionln~ that hem No. 23 will probably happen
this year.
An Coltrain, Del Rio, asked if the City would enter into separa~ contracts for the various work.
Sexier responded that they could but he would prefer it under one contra~t.
A discussion regarding the Contract and bidding process took place at this time. Serlet stated that the
reduction of the bond amount may allow more contractors to bid. Serlet mentioned that qualifications,
experience and prior work are factors included in the sele~ion proce~. Serlet said that possibly next
year a board formed of experienced Contractors could assist the City with writing the bid package. Once
agnln~ Setlet sB:essed the fact that if there were any questions or concerns that they could be addressed
at any time with Brad Buron or himself.
Serlet read and explained the background behind Item No. 3, Page NB-1, Class A license.
Mike Monteleone Jr., Monteleone Excavating, brought up an item of interest regarding, Item No. 2, Page
P-3. He wanted the other Contractors to be aware that this item includes saw Cutting and disposal.
The Conwactors inquired as to when they would be notified of the bid results. Buron responded that a
final decision may be made within two weeks from the bid opting.
Mike Monteleone Jr., Monteleone Excavating, inquired as to what would happen in the event of a fie.
Setlet responded that there may be more than one Conlractor in that event.
Meeting was adjourned O 2:50 p.m. on July 20, 1993.
City Council
David F. Dixon, City M,'msger
Scott F. Field, City Atwmey
Grant Yates, Financial Services Admini-~trator
Bradley A. Buron, ]V[nlnfe~nnCe S~.lperilltelKleJlt
Pals2of2
oJ
88888888888
IEIiE :iEEi i~EE~ I
¢D
I
e
CUNNINGHAM-DAVIS
CORPORATION
EmteJ~iahed
11082 Ml~Av~, Forearia. CA92337
leoe) 82s-30~ ,, Fax 4See) 822-75'~ S
i 3 893
September 13, 1993
J~r, Tim Setlet
Direct. or of Pubtic klOrks
City of Tamecute
qJr7/ Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Dear Nr. Serlet,
Thank you for your time last Thursday. To elaborate on our possible office
yard in TemecuJa, w~ are discussing a potential lease on Front $treel; a~ the
--~ld Ram-Tek s i
For your information, we have several .jobs thoughout Southern California which
are slmilar in nature to your Street HeinEchance Program, and we perfern some
300 to 400 similar. jobs per year. These include'pavement patching, s.Tdewelk
and curb replacement, drainage channel repair and slope restoral:ion.
in addition =o thes= maintenance type projects, we ~sua~l~,.do 30 re 50 new
construction jobs on an annual basis from $100,000.00 to $l,000,000.00 in value.
Presently we have 38 act|re conCrac~ projects from $29,000.00 to $800,000.00,
including one for Riverton Park for your clty~
Our personnel are available in the locale for immedlate response in case of
emergency. I personally Tive nearby~ only 10 mlnuCes from Temecu]a. Our
superintendent, Del $chmidt lives in Perrls and other employees live in the
area.
$hou]d you have further concerns or questions, do not hesitate to ca1|.
Sincerely,
Nell Zoller
General Hen/get
cc: fl
City of Temecula
43174. Bus~ness Park Drive · -Temecula. California 92590
June 22, 1993
ADDENDUM NO. I
1909) 694-1989 · FAX 1909) c -~9~
PROJECT: FY93-94 STREET MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
BID NO. 037
Item No. 5 under the section "Notice Inviting Bids", page NB-1, is amended to
read as follows:
"The successful bidder shall be required to furnish a labor and materials
bond and a faithful performance bond in the amount of $225,000.00
each ."
Item B. & C. under the section "Contract Bonds", page IB-5 is amended to read
as follows:
Payment Bond. The Payment Bond (material and labor) shall be for not
less than $225,000 of the Contract price to satisfy claims of material
suppliers and of mechanics and laborers employed by him on the work.
The bond shall be maintained by the Contractor in full force and effect
until the completed work is accepted by the City and until all claims for
materials and labor are paid.
Faithful Performance Bond. The Faithful Performance Bond shall be for
$225,000 of the Contract price to guaranty faithful performance of all
work, within the time prescribed in a manner satisfactory to the City,
and that all materials and workmanship will be free from original or
developed defects.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 9091694-6411.
Sincerely,,
Brad A. Buron
Maintenance Superintendent
pwOGVoede~etmdnt~acld. 1 062293
City of Temecula
\~' 43174 Bus~ness Park Dnve · Temecula, Cahfornla 92590
June 24, 1993
ADDENDUM NO. 2
(9091 694-1989 · FAX t909i 694-~99C,
PROJECT: FY93-94 STREET MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
BID NO. 037
elI .
Item No. I under the section "Notice Inviting Bids", page NB-1, is amended to
revise the bid opening date and to add a date and time for a pre-bid meeting as
follows:
"NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Temecula, Riverside County,
California, will receive sealed bids up to 4:30 p.m., on Thursday, the 5th
of August, 1993, in the office of the City Clerk: 43174 Business Park
Drive, Temecuia, California 92590 at which time said bids will be
publicly opened and read."
"On Tuesday, July 20, 1993 a pre-bid meeting will be held at 2:00 p.m.
in the main conference room at Temecula City Hail, for the purpose of
answering questions concerning the project or bidding procedure."
If you have any questions, please contact me at 9091694-6411.
Sincerely,
/.._L
Brad A. Buron
Maintenance Superintendent
1 City of Temecula
\,~,~ 43174 Business Park Dnve· Temecula, Califorma 92590
July 20, 1993
ADDENDUM NO. 3
6944989 · FAX !'c)O~)i ~,~
PROJECT: FY93-94 STREET MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
BID NO. 037
e
s
Under
Under
Under
Under
the section 'Instruction to Bidders", page IB-2, G., is amended to read as follows:
EMERGENCY WORK· All emergency work not specified by unit price in the
contract shall be directed by the City Engineer and performed on a time and
materials basis, in accordance with the rate schedule attached to this contract in
Bid Schedule 2 with unit prices to include all overhead.
the section "Instruction to Bidders", page IB-2, I., is eliminated from the contract
the section "Instruction to Bidders", page 'IB-2, I., replacement reads as follows:
EXTRA WORK. All extra work not specified by unit price in the contract shall be
approved by the City Engineer and performed on a time and materials basis in
accordance with the rate schedule attached to the contract in Bid Schedule 2 with
unit prices to include all overhead.
the section "Instruction to Bidders", page IB-1, D., is amended to read as follows:
A Work Order shall be issued for each street maintenance project to be performed.
The Work to be performed shall be completed within thirty {30) working days after
the Work Order is issued, except that all emergency work shall be started within
twenty-four hours (24) of issuance of the Work Order.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 909/694-6411.
Sincerely,
Maintenance Superintendent
pwOGVoede~tmaint~add.3 072093
.,1 City of Ternecula
43174 Bus~ness Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590
694-1989 · ~AX i909)
July 22, 1993
ADDENDUM NO, 4
PROJECT: FY93-94 'STREET MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
BID NO. 037
Under the 'Proposal Bid Sheet", page P-2, Bid Deposit, is amended to read as follows:
BID DEPOSIT:
There is enclosed herewith, a certified check or surety bond in the sum of Ten Thousand
DOLLARS and NO CENTS ($10,000.00) made payable to the City of Temecula and the
undersigned agrees that in case of his failure to execute the necessary contract and
furnish the required bonds, the certified check or surety bond the money payable thereon,
shall be and remain the property of the City of Temecula.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 9091694-6411.
Sincerely,
Brad A. Buron
Maintenance Superintendent
pwOS~'oedeMntaint~id.3 072083
CITY OF TEMECULA
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
PROCEDURES FOR INFORMAL BIDDING
FOR PUBLIC WORKS STREET MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS
OF $25,000 OR LESS
FISCAL YEAR 1993-1994
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
In order to bid on street maintenance work of $25,000 or less, all contractors must
be pre-qualified and meet the following requirements:
A. Licensing:
1. Asphalt Paving and Grading:
II.
· R:~itymtty~irefmlid,l~d
e
Concrete Repair Work:
Class C-12 - Contractors License
required
Class C-8 - Contractors License
required
3. Class "A" Contractors License covers all above mentioned work
B. City of Temecula Business License required
C. Insurance Endorsements (see attached.)
1. Commercial General Liability and automobile coverage ($1,000,000
per occurrence) naming the City of Temecula as Additional Insured.
2. Workers Compensation and Employers Liability
BIDDING PROCEDURE
A. Each Wednesday morning at 7:30 a.m., new Work Orders will be available
for pick-up at Public Work/Engineering counter, City of Temecula, City Hall,
43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590.
B. Only sealed bids will be accepted. Sealed bids must be delivered to the City
Clerk's office before 2:30 p.m. on the following Wednesday. Bids will be
opened at City Hall at 2:30 p.m. by the City Clerk's office.
C. Bids to be valid for sixty (60) calendar days.
D. The Lowest Reasonable Bidder will be issued the work order. All work
orders of $10,000 or less will be awarded by the City Manager. All work
, -1: of 14
orders over $10,000 and under $25,000 will be awarded by the City
Council.
The Lowest Responsible Bidder will be issued a Purchase Order Number
(P.O.#) and a Contract to be executed before work is started. (The form of
contract is attached.) After issue of a P.O.#, work is to begin within four (4)
working days. If not started within four (4) working days, the second
lowest bidder will be awarded Purchase Order, and the bidder will be
disqualified from future work for one (1) year.
All work is to be completed within ten (10) working days unless
Maintenance Superintendent authorizes an extension of time.
City reserves the right to reject all bids.
All bids to have unit prices, (i.e., A/C repair - sq. ft. price, curb and gutter
lineal foot price; side walk remove and replace - sq. ft. price, A/C berm, L.F.
price etc.)
All invoices must reference applicable P.O.#. Payment will not be processed
without a certified payroll attached to al invoices.
Because payment will not be made until all work is complete, no
performance or labor and material bonds will be required. Payment is to be
made thirty five (35) days after all work completed and a full Release
executed. (The form of the Release is attached).
III.
SCOPE OF WORK
A. Work Orders will describe Scope of Work.
All work to be performed according to Standard Soecifications for Public
Works Construction ("Green Book") and City of Temecula Public Works
Deoartment Standard Drawinqs for Public Works Construction ("Standard
Drawings"). Copies of the Standard Drawings may be purchased from the
City for $17.50.
Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1771 et sea, not less than the
general prevailing rate of per diem wages shall be paid to all workers
employed by the Contractor. Copies of the prevailing wages are available at
the City Clerk's office. The Contractor shall post the prevailing wages at
each job site.
Contractor shall at all times comply with California Department of
Transportation Manual of Traffic Controls For Construction and Maintenance
Work Zones.
,:~.,y~,a~e~d 2 - - 2 of z/~
All questions regarding procedures on Street Maintenance Work Orders are
to referred to Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer or Brad Buron,
Maintenance Supervisor at (909) 694-6411.
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMEaNT
THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of , 1993, by and between
the City of Temecula a municipal corporation, duly organized and existing under and by
virtue of the laws of the State of California, hereinafter called the {"Contractor".
WITNESSETH
1. The ContractOr, in consideration of the promises of the City hereinafter set forth,
hereby agrees to furnish all tools, equipment, labor and materials necessary to perform and
complete in a workmanlike manner, all of the work required for the construction of the
improvements described in Work Order No. attached hereto. The work shall be
performed according to the City of Temecula's Procedures For Informal Biddin~ For Public
Works Street Maintenance Work Orders of $25.000 or Less. Fiscal Year 1993-94.
("Informal Bidding Procedures').
Where the Work Order or the Informal Bidding Procedures describe portions of the
work in general terms, but not in complete detail, the latest version of the City of Temecula.
Department of Public Works Standards Drawings for Public Works Construction ("Standard
Drawings"), and Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including al
supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative ComrniRee of the Southern
California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California
(hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") shall control. Copies of the Standard Specifications
are available from the publisher:
Building News~ Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
In case of any conflict between the Standard Drawings and the Standard
Specifications, the Standard Drawings shall control. Where the Work Order, the Informal
Bidding Procedures, the Standard Drawings, or the Standard Specifications only describe
portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the
item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general
practice is to be used.
2. The City, in consideration of the performance of this Contract, agrees to pay the
Contractor and the Contractor agrees to accept in full satisfaction for the work done
R:~ityaUy~infmibid.A6R ~, /~ Of
hereunder the sum of dollars ($ ), in accordance with the bid of the
Contractor which sum shall be paid to the Contractor within the time and in the manner set
forth in the Informal Bidding Procedures, final payment to be made within thirty-five (35)
days after filing Notice of Completion of said work and improvement with the Riverside
County Recorder.
3. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor code of the State of
California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and
the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification,
or type of workman needed to execute this Contract from the Director of the Department of
Industrial Relations. These rates are on file in the office of the City Clerk. Copies may be
obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office in Temecula. Contractor shall post a copy of such
wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a. minimum.
Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Section 1773.8, 177:5, 1776, 1777.1:5,
1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the
City, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each
laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any
work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of
the provisions of the Contract.
4. Contractor, by executing the Contract, hereby certifies:
"I am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code
which requires every employer be insured against liability for
Workman's compensation or undertake self-insurance in
accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I .will comply '
with such provisions before commencing the performance of the
work of this Contract."
5. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or
delivering materials to the site, shall be at the risk of Contractor alone. Contractor agrees to
save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend City, its officers, employees, and agents, against
any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (Contractor's employees included) and
damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or
out of the operations conducted by Principal, save and except claims or litigations arising
through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the City.
R:\cityattyXinfmlbid. AGR 2 5 -Of 1/+
6. Contractor and subcontractors shall obtain all necessary licenses, including but not
limited to City business license.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto
subscribed and affixed by the [Mayor/City Manager] and attested to by the City Clerk, both
thereunto duly authorized, and the Contractor has hereunto subscribed this Contract the day,
month and year hereinabove written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
By: By:
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
(Contractor)
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
(hate)
APPROVED AS -TO FORM:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
R:Xcityauy~infmlbid .AGR 3
6 of 14
City of Temecula
Public Works Department
WORK ORDER REQUEST
Street Maintenance
DATE:
JOB//93-94 -
LOCATION:
SCOPE OF WORK INVOLVED:
CONTRACTOR
pEAIll=r) BY:
TOTAL PRICE:
CITY
APPROVED BY:
7 of 14
PROJECT NO.
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE
This is to certify that , (hereinafter the
"undersigned") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath· that it has paid in full for ell
materials· supplies· labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for. by the
undersigned or by any of the undersigned's agents, employees· or subcontractors used or in
contribution to the execution of its contract with the City of Temecula with regard to the
building, erection· construction or repair of that certain work of improvement known as:
· situated in the Community of
· City of Temecula, State of California· more particularly
described as follows:
The undersigned declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said
Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a stop notice of any
unpaid sums owning to the undersigned.
Further· for valuable consideration· the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the
undersigned does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and
employees of the City· and each of them, from any and all claims, debts, demands, or causes
of action which exist or might exist in favor of the undersigned and the City of Temecula or
which relate in any way to the work performed by the undersigned with regard to the above
referenced construction project.
Further, the undersigned expressly acknowledges its awareness of and waives the
benefits of 1542 of the Civil Code of the State of California which provides: "A general
release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his
favor at the time of executing the release, which if known to him must have materially
effected his settlement with the debtor."
This release is intended to be a full and general release of any and all claims which the
undersigned now has or may, in the future, have against the City of Temecula and/or its
agents and employees with regard to any matter arising from the construction or the above
referenced project or the contract between the City and the Contractor with respect thereto
whether such claims are now known or unknown or are suspected or unsuspected.
Dated:
By:
(Name)
(Title)
8 of 14
INVITATION TO PLACE YOUR
NAME ON CITY OF TEMECULA'S
LIST OF QUALIFIED CONTRACTORS
For Public Worlds Street Maintenance
Work Order of $25.000'or less.
To All Licensed Contractors:
You are hereby invited to place your name on the City of Temecula's list of
pre-qualified contractors for street maintenance work of $25,000 or less.
To obtain information on how to become pre-qualified, please provide the
following information:
Name
Mailing address
Class of contractor's license(s)
Contractors license Number(s)
and mail it to:
CITY OF TEMECULA
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Attention: City Clerk
A summary of pre-qualification procedures will be sent to you.
Exhjb~Z 6
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR CONTRACTORS
Contractor shx~ Frocure and maintain for the duration of the contract instance aZainst claims for injuries
property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, his agenu,
rel~resentatives. employees or subcon~acma.
Minimum Scope of !nsumnco
Coverage shall be st least as broad as:.
l. Insurance Services Office Conunacial General Liab~ty coversac (occw~ce f~,,, CG 0001).
2. bsurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. l/g7) coveting Automobile L~.'ty, code I (affy auto).
3. Work~s~C~m~au~i~ninsmm~ce~srequiredbythe~ta~e~rC~forniaand~mp~yer*sLhbi~tyL*ts~r~.
Minimum Limits of Insurance
Contractor shall maintain liftills no Jess than:
Liability Insurance or other form with a general sagream limit is used. eidm* the general allrqss~ limit shall apply sepantelv
to this l~n'ojecffioc·tion or the general saFegate limit shall be twice the required ocCunence limiL
2. Automobile Liability:. $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage,
3. Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
Deductib|es and Self-Insured Retentions
Any 'deductlbies or self-insured retentions must be declared to and al~xoved by the ~nity. At the epe~n of the Enthy, either:. the
volunteers; or the Contractor shall procure a bond psranteejn2 payment of louu and xe, Jan~d invesligalions, claim sdminislration and
Other Insurance Provisions
.~]lxe general liability and automobile liability policies ere to contain, or be endorsed m contain, the following provisions:
1. The Entity, its of~cen, orSclals, employees, agents and volnnteen are to be covered as insureds as respect: ]iabillty arising
out of activities performed by or on behalf of %1~ Contract, pmducu and compieud opendons of d~e Connctor; lnmises
o~ed, occupied or used by the Cotteractor, or aun~nobiles owned, leased, hired or !xrmwed by zig Contractor. The coverage
shall contain no special lintitalions on the scope of proteaion afforded to d~ F=u~, its ofScen, off'~cials, employees, agenls or
volunteers.
2. For any claims related to this ln~>ject, the Contrac~r's insunnce coverage shall bc lrimary insurance as respects the Entity, its
office~, officials, employees, qenls and voltmteers. Any insurance or self-insm'ance maintained by the Entity, its officen,
olT~cials, ~nployees, agents or vohmxeen shall be excess of the Contracmr's instu'sr.e and shall not conxn'butc with it.
3. Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaclr. s of warranties shall not affect
coverage provided to the Entity, its officen, officials, employees, agents orvohm~en.
4. The Contraclor's ~ shall apply selnrately to each inswed against whom claim is made or suit is !rouf, ht, except with
respect to the limils of the insurer's liability.
:5. Each insurance policy requix~d by this clause shall be endorsed to staxe that covenge shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled
by either parry, reduced in coverage or in limits except afxer thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return
receipt requested, has been given to the Entity.
Acceptability of Insurers
Insur~ce is to be placed with inswe~ with · current AJ~I. Best's fining of no less than A:VII.
Verification of Coverage
Conu'actor shall furnish ~ Enxity with original endo~ements effec~ coverage nxtx~red by this clame, T/~ endox-~ments m~ to be
signed by · person authorized by thsx insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endonemem a~ to be on forms provided by the
Entity. All ~dorsements are to be received and approved by the Entity before work c~,,,,,~s. As an ahernative to the Entity's
fonm, the Conn~mr's insurer may lxovlde complex., ceniSed copies of all n~/ulred insursnce polick~, including endonen,.enls
effectinlr the coverage requixed by these s~ens.
Subcontrsctors
Co..._nu-actor shall include all subconncmn as insweds under its policies or shall hrnish separate cenif'r. Mes and endonements fer each
~ntractor. All coverages for su~xors shall bc subject to all of the x~ents stated ~ '
SCJPIA Insurance Requirements Manual
18
10 of 14
WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY · . .+ ..... .-, ..
S P EC i A L'. E N D O R S E M E N ....~::~iii.!i:~:'::-.'-ii~:~.~-~!~:i-:iiii~;i~;;;;:-:~-~i'-!:i', ,":':::~:!:;;':!i;~!~;~ii-;~i~i~:i'~ ':-::~-.~ :!::--:--~i. '~-.:'.~ i. ~':--: '::-' ~'' =:s' · * .*
~DUCER POUCY INFORMA~ON:
OTHER PROVISIONS
NAMED INSURED
CLAIMS:
Name:.
~s:
EMPLOYERS UABILITY UMITS
S F, achAmaeq
S (DSmI--Pok/L~)
S b--Each
thatNo. it is agreed u IDIIDWS: · *
1. CA~ELLAT~NN~1~CE.Th~in~r~c~h~n~bec~d.~r~ii~y~educ~di~ve~~b~~~b~~f~;~~
I~n Oiven to SheEnlily.
2 WA~ER~F~U~R~GAT~N~Th~n~uea~ce~m~ny~ee~v~ve~i~i~hts~ube~d~n~ifts~N~~~~F~Md~~s
i' 'e~dunderthetenTtsof~hispdicywhichetbefmmNwofkpedo~NN~dh~ib~.
~t~s~tated~b~ven~th~n~hefein~h~behe~d~w~ve~te~r~x~d~ny~N~imits~~i~~fN~to~~~a~
ENDORSEMENT HOLDER
ENTITY
AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE D BrokerlAgenl F'lUnden~ef !'l
J (pdnlAype Mme)0 Winill Ihll I hive
aulhc~lylobiad!M-' :v= ;,,enlionedinsurancec~mpanyandbyntysignaNfehireon
dosobirdlhb~etti:lnylolhbNtdora~em.
Telephone: ( ) !:Xllle Signed
SCJI~IA Insurance Requirements Manual
14
11 of* 14
NSUIED
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
COVERAGES
~'~".; IS TO CERTIFY 'I~'IAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVe. BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOV~. FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INOICATED. NOTWlTHSTkt;;)~G
;i~ :.:JIREMENTS, TERM OR CON;:3i110N OF Alff COkfrRACT OFI OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESP:CTTO WHICH "THIS CERTIFICATE MAY Bt ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN 'IHE INSURANC~ k'FO;h,~,D BY
~:~P~L~C~ESDE~R~EDHER~N~S~U~JE~TT~LLTHETERMS~EX~UJS~NSAN~C~N~f~N~F~U~~~i~~PN~M~
leeEl eall(eM,110/ff) IAT!(Ma4/MR~ /i,,LUilTlmllmlaAll
IgeFJt&t UAIIUW
D COMMFJ~DAL GENERN. IJAlU.fTY
D CLNMS M,iDE D
D OWNERS & COk s~""TOR*S PROT.
D OTHER
ImDM0111~IJa/IIR'/
DNffAZRO
DNJ. OWNED'.&UT0S
DSCH~DUI.ED'AZ/'r06
/*---
,\
DGARAGEUAmUTr
DUM!t.tA
DOTt. ER/HANUMSRg..tAR)RM
D WORKEIr$ COMIrdISA~ON
E~ UAtLI~'
DCO~*.MOFmNS'nm6'nON
Fg~I)NL&NNttR'fI~NGieJURY
F.A~OO:tltqBCE
MB)r, ALBl:PgiiE~k;e/eeeleem}
I
IO01LYeUJiW
i
ITATUlgRr
THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS APPLY:
~eleN.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER/ADDITIONAL INSURED AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
I"H01EN0. -
12 of 14
· Exhibit 3
AUTOMOBILE 'LIABILITY SPECiAL*ENDORSEMENT' .-"-'=:*:!""'-;sueMIT 8N DUPLICATE
"~ODUCER POLICY INFORMATION:
LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSE [] Im~uded h Lintis
•bAdcleoetoUntts
TetepNae
NAMED INSURED
TYPE OF INSURANCE..!--.: !...-':...:~:..:/::.:.:.;-:-~=: :::'.-.:.:.'~:!!:,?.~.: .......;:..~:. OTHER PROVISIONS
COMMERCIAL AUTO POLICY
BUSINESS AUTO POUCY
OTHER
LIMIT OF LIABILITY .:':',:...:;:.'..' . :':.'::" '. '-:.:: .- .": :.;;:::,:.!::.:::' !.. .:, CLAIMS: Undmwi~ ~ kx mk.s purerot to ~is m.ranct
Name:
Teleplem: ( I
ol
°nsidemNm°tNIxe~'ium~'~ledendno-%~N-' .X~n~en~int:~nsistants~Neme~tinN~x~rtytotef~:h~is~i~of~n/er-1kn~`~L~ofhofe~
tee. it is agreed as follows:
8ndaclivi~esladom~dbyofonbehelfolthenamedinsumd.
2. CONTRIBUTION NOT REQUIRED. As aspects: (I) week pertonned by the NBmed insured Is' of on behalf of
errSyeas or volunteers: or stand in an unlxohan chain of coverage excess of N NameN:f lasufed's scheduled undoflying lYimofy cevofage.
maintained by the E ntfiy. its elected or minted orScars. off',:ids. employees or volunteers drag be la excess of INs insurance
3. SEvERABiUTY~F~NTEREST~Thisinsurancee;:des~ytoee:hlasuedageinstwh~mdeimis~sd~b~ugh~exce;x~meeqx~to1hacen1xny.sreito~rebTe/~
The incbsion ol ae~ pe ~ of ofganiZ81~on ms an la sure shll not affect any right which such per~n of ofganizal~on w~JM have s$ · ciBifia~t if not so ladude(L
4. CAN~ELLAT~N~T1~E.Withrespe~1to~Ninto~sts~En~ty~dsins~snce~Mn~tbea~ed~orma~ei~ymdg~8dinNp~imitsexce~ter~tit/(3~)d~y~miof
w, itten notice by receipted riBlivery hBs been given to the Enlty.
5. PR~V~S~NSREGARD~NGTHE~NSURED.SDUT~ES~Any~i~rek)so~TTyrywi~1m~x)ftn~visk~s~fNp~re/~xeed~sorvi~itkms~lwena~ssha~t~mvem~e
pmvl dad In the Enlity, its dected of allied olrr. ers, olSciads, employees o~ volunleofs.
6. SCOPE OF COVERAGE. This I~licy, if I~mofy, efton:Is aversOn $t bast as Ixoad 8s:
(1) insurance Sewices Of6ce Iofm number CAO001 (Ed. 1/87), Cede I ('any 8uto'): of
(2) H~cess~thxdsc~veragewhichi~t~ea~brmidastie~ximofyinsumnce~~lathe~xecedingseeeen(1).
Except~tateda~xwen~INhgher~inshai~beheid1~waiv~edtorof~xtend8ny~fthe~knitsc~n~Rd~ns~Feementsof~xd~i~e~f~p~icytowhichthisend~aament~8UN:hed~
ENDORSEMENTHOLDER ';:::..:: .: "+:-:'~.~;:.: '.-'."':-.:.':':'.:i, :!':~'::::-::'..i~..;:::;i':..'=~.;i~'i::::::~:::'~;::::ii~:,.~i.?,-'!~-!.~ :.-.:.'. . .. '..+- '.. · ...
EI%rl'ITY AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE [] BmkerlAgem []Underwaller
I
ellhodlylobindlheabove-menlionedinsuranoeoxnpanyandbymysignalmehem~n
do so bind this mmpany lo lhis end~.aemenL ·
Signlure
T,~.o~: ( ) ~, s~,~ I
ICJPIA Insurance Requirements Manual
13
13 of 14
Tm~lmne
NAMEDINSURED
AUTOMOBILE 'LIABILITY :SPECIAL'ENDORSEMENT ':SUBMIT IN DUPLICATE
'FOR: ':' ':
/' "'"~UCER : POUCY INFORMATION:
LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSE D kdad h LeNs
APPUCABILITY. Tliskmaa~eloeuNlaleeWjmsmer~ecydme~t. ne~
"ed~dmfimagmmmmandpemmhkeeMihNEmyenlmchecMdlm ['i in~,~h
clmonlYbkiMinglPldSclFle~llnlMpeqMstdO!lteEllityklmemt.
TYPE OF INSURANCE :.:E E-.."-'.::-:..:.-:,:.:..-:'::= :.'-: '.:.:"~i:-.:~;,.~:'.-'.-';:.j~ OTHER PROVISIONS
COMMERCIAl. AUTO POLICY
sus~ss AUTO PerCY
OTHER
CLAIMS: UriNe, ewes ee, -- ' ,L.: W. ~ leasum w sis roetame,
Name:
Addtee:
TmpNx.: (
rr/*'''''' ~agre~la. iDiiov~:
8ndmcSivitiespe~nedbyoronbehalfcdNnarnedinsumL .
2. CONTRIBUTION NOT REOUIRED. Asm(m)wekebyN~bewedfeembWmi!ofNF=nlit/;w(Nm~N~beIN~e
(c~ernise~eas4dbyNNa~mdin~umc~1m~NEitNy~Nin~ue~nce~km~edby~dspeic;/~h~De~xim~yine/~NN:e~N~~~~~~
employees or volurlleer$; or stand in an unbr0ke, chain O! Coverage excess of Ule NBmed bsure(rs schedubcI undel/in0 Ixirm~/ceverage. in 'dlhef met 8ny olher insurerim
rreintaihed by the E nt~ ty. iLs elected or N3f]omled obrk obs. imployces or vokJIlleers M be ks ezcess d 1his insull~d Md dml ee4 metriMe 11~ i&
3, $~-_vERAB~LrrY~F~F~EgT~l1isinmu~m~:;im~a~mmd~nmmmhmgmi~m~v~emmd'dmimmTmmbormmmtim~"emm~h~emmm~mm:~heOrn~meYmremim~rmmhTmy'
Theinciuskm~f~e/Pers~nororganizmi~naseninsutedshd~n~ectmnydih~which~mer~anoreeganizad~ngmek~bev~ci'dmemi~ms~indudecL
4. cANCELLAT~NN~T~c~:V/ith~esp8ctto~hein~e~ts~NEn~y~bsue8N:8sh~ne4bec~/1c8~ed~wwe~ri~y~edMcedin~xqorre1i~s~m:~e~r~vety(3~)de)~w
wfiltenno~cebyreceipledcl'dmfThmlbeengiventoNEfi~ty'
5. PROVISIONS REGARDING THE INSURED'S IXITES. Any !due m ~:eqdy wilh mlae'dn9 pm,ldes of me policy m breee~m er vinlelions ef waffenles N not mllmcl everage
presided to me Enety.'its ,dected or ~_,~,~'~_'ted ei~es, olEcials. emple/ees or velmlees.
6. SCOPE OF COVERAGE. Thislmicy.~lxime/.mfifixdsc=vem~emtbaslambmedBt
(1) Insurerice Sen,k:es Office krm nuttier CAIX)01 (Ed. 1/17). C4xin I Ceny 8urn'): or
(2') i~cess'~i~xds~vera~ewhichisatieest8s~x~edasN~ximar/k~fanancefOrmsmb~ncedinmepmcedinge(1~
Excep~ta~edeb~v~n~hinghereinsha~behe~dtomive~8~Br~xex~endMy~me.~imitscemidees~agmemeea~rezciusi~e~fmep~icytowhich~is~n6~ v:~,mntisBUachecL
ENDORSEMENT HOLDER
ENTITY
AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE
I
13 BmkwAg~m Flu. e..~ !'1
(Ixinz4~ge Mine), warram ~ha I have
mmmhedy mbindme-~ ;vl ,,~;nenedimumnm mmpanyand bymysignaNm hefeen
dDmolmim~dllis~Wlhisend~m:mtm L '
'rekphoM: ( ) ~tte
SCJPlA Insurance Requirements Manuel
13
14 Of 14
ITEM
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY~~,~
FINANCE OFFICEN
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
October 5, 1993
Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Development of Old Town
Temecula Into a Major Destination Entertainment Facility
RECOMMENDATION: That the Council approve and authorize the Mayor to execute
a "Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Development of Old Town Temecula Into a
Major Destination Entertainment Facility".
DISCUSSION: Zev Buffman has approached the City regarding entering into a
private/public partnership that would lead to the development of Old .Town Temecula into
a major destination entertainment facility with a Western theme. The project would
include converting Old Town into a pedestrian mall with adjacent parking and adequate
traffic circulation, and the acquisition of land for the development and construction of
entertainment venue(s) for music, dance, theme entertainment and electronic attractions
such cabaret theaters, a tented "'Wild West" show, a "Showboat" and avenue for food
and wine shows.
Mr. Buffman has considerable experience with similar entertainment projects. He
has developed an entertainment amphitheater in Phoenix, and most recently, caused the
development of, and now manages the Glen Helen Amphitheater in San Bernardino.
The M.O.U. would lead to the adoption of a formal, private/public partnership
agreement for the development, construction and operation of the Project. The formal
agreement would provide that the City/Redevelopment Agency would initially pay for
construction of the Project, and that Buffman will make payments to the City/Agency of.
(a) amounts equal to City/Agency debt service on the bonds issued to cover the cost of
Buffman's elements of the Project; (b) specified percentage payments of gross proceeds
from operation of the Project; and (c) reimbursement for a portion of City and Agency
infrastructure costs in an amount to be negotiated.
R:%agerd.e.rpt'dNffman,cc 1 -
In addition, revisions to the draft Old Town Specific Plan, as well as adoption of
Redevelopment Agency administrative guidelines for Old Town may be necessary. In
particular, the Redevelopment Plan requires Agency approval of any real property
development within the redevelopment area. Both the Old Town Specific Plan and the
Redevelopment Agency administrative guidelines could be used to evaluate the conformity
of individual private developments with the Project.
FISCAL IMPACT: The initial cost of revising the Specific Plan Document to incorporate
the Project, including implementation measures for development of the "'Shoot-out Zone"
(Pedestrian Mall) is difficult to estimate because a specific work program has not yet been
established.
-2- .;
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING
DEVELOPlV!F~NT OF OLD TOWN TEMECULA INTO A
MAJOR DESTINATION ENTERTAINME~ FACHATY
This Memorandum of Understanding made this __ day of
, 1993, at Temecula, California, is entered into between the City of Temecula,
a Municipal Corporation ("City"), The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula
("Agency"), and T.Z.B.G., INC. ("Buffman").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City and the Agency desire to induce the development within
the Old Town area of the City of Temecula of a major destination entertainment faCility;
such a facility would include convening Old Town into a pedestrian mall with adjacent
parking and adequate traffic circulation, and the acquisition of land for the development and
construction of entertainment venue(s) for music, dance, and theme entertainment, such as
cabaret theaters, a tented 'Wild West' show, a "Showboat,' avenue for food and wine
shows, and/or other suitable venues ("hereinafter referred to as the "Project'); and
WHEREAS, Buffman desires to acquire the exclusive right to negotiate a
private/public partnership with the City and the Agency to develop the Project in Old Town.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto, enter into the following Memorandum
of Understanding:
1. GRANT OF OPTION
The City and the Agency hereby grant to Buffman the exclusive right to
negotiate a private/public partnership with the City for development of the Project. This
option shall' commence, on the day and year first above written and shall remain in effect
until April 1, 1995. If however, efforts and progress are evident in the first 18 months of
this option, the option shall be extended for one (1) additional six (6) month period.
2. NEGOTIATIONS
A. Private/Public Partnership Agreement
Within the term of the Option or Extensions thereto, the parties shall negotiate
in good faith on the terms of a private/public parmership agreement to provide for the
development and operation of the Project. The parties shall during the option period
commence discussions with planners/architects/engineers and other design personnel and
perform other necessary research and development to help achieve the Project's success.
The formal agreement will incorporate the following elements:
A. Buffman ReSponsibilities: ---.
(1) Development Phase:
Buffman will recommend planners/architects/engineers and
other design personnel to the City and the Agency, and assist
the City and the Agency, in developing conceptual plans for the
Project.
(b)
Participate in preparation.for the bid selection process for and
render assistance with the negotiation of contracts for the design
personnel.
(2) Construction Phase:
Participate in preparation for the bid selection process for and
render assistance with the negotiation of a construction contract
with a general contractor for construction of the Project.
Co)
Participate with the City and the Agency, in the supervision and
guidance of construction of the Project, including without
limitation the following:
(i) Preparation of construction budget and schedule;
(ii)
Preparation of engineering, soil, drainage, and other
technical reports;.
(iii) Supervision and co-ordination of design
personnel and contractors;
(iv)
Preparation of draw requests for construction fund
disbursements; and
(v)
Assist the City and the Agency, in selection of a
construction Project Manager.
Operation Phase:
direct, supervise, manage and operate the Project under the
partnership agreement with the City, and determine the program
and policies to be followed in connection therewith.
(b)
Purchase and maintain public and employer's liability,
workmarts compensation, fire and extended coverage, and such
other customary insurance as necessary in the management and
operation of its elements of the Project.
(c) Carry out all maintenance relative to its elements of the Project.
The partnership agreement shall provide for payments by
Buffman to the City and the Agency of (a) amounts equal to
City/Agency debt service on the bonds issued to cover the cost
of Buffman's elements of the Project; (b) specified percentage
payments of gross proceeds from operation of the Project; and
(c) reimbursement for a portion of City and Agency
infrastructure costs in an amount to be negotiated.
(e) Include 'Temecula" in legal and operating name of the Project.
C. City and Agency ReSponsibilities:
1. Development Phase:
The City will make every. effort to amend the proposed Specific Plan
for Old Town to comply with the needs of the Project. The City will
contract with the necessary design professionals to prepare an
appropriate amendment to the Specific Plan for submission to the City
Planning Commission; provided, that this Memorandum does not
restrict the discretion of the City Planning Commission, the City
Council, or the City itself to approve or deny any amendment to the
Specific Plan.
(b)
The Agency shall make every effort to establish administrative
guidelines' with which all future development within Old Town must
comply, taking into consideration the needs, goals and plans of the
Project; provided, this Memorandum does not restrict the discretion of
the Agency to approve or deny any proposed guidelines. The
guidelines may specify the following development criteria:
(i) Architectural guidelines;
Use guidelines which would not only assure
consistency of uses but also be intended to avoid
duplication of uses to insure that a variety of
complementary services are available to the public
within Old Town;
Criteria concerning themes, quality of services
and products, developed for businesses on real
property located in the Old Town area;
(iv) Proposed geographical locations for specific uses;
Review of any new use proposed for the Old Town area by the Agency would
consider all these criteria in determining whether or not the proposed use
conformed with the Redcvelopment Plan, also taking into consideration the
needs, goals and plans of the Project.
2. Construction Phase:
Upon execution of a formal partnership agreement between the City,
Agency and Buffman, and adoption of a Specific Plan amendment, the
City and/or Agency will ~nd, commence and complete, or cause to be
completed,' the construction of the Project.
3.. TERMINATION
At the end of the option period, if the parties have not entered inw a formal
private/public partnership for the Project, then this Memorandum shall terminate, and the
parties shall have no obligations to each other.
4. DAMAGRq
Shall either party breach this Memorandum, the other party's damages shall be
limited to actual, out-of-pocket expenses in attempting to negotiate the partnership agreement.
In no event shall the breaching party be liable to the other party for damages in the. form of
lost profits or consequential damages.
Dated:
T.Z.B.G., INC.
By:
ZEV BUFFMAN
Dated:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
J. SAL MUNOZ, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
SCO~T F. FIELD,
C1TY ATTORNEY
Dated:
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
RONALD PARKS, CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
KINE S. Gl~l~-K, RDA SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
SCOIT F. FIEf-I)
GENERAL COUNSEL
ITEM NO.
APPROV/~r.
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
October 12, 1993
Adoption of Travel Policy
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the attached travel policy.
DISCUSSION: The attached policy incorporates an item discussed'by Council to
allow reimbursement for alcoholic beverages purchased in a business setting as
specifically authorized by the City Manager (see page 5).
The policy also incorporates a change requiring the City Manager, rather than the City
Council, to approve all out of state travel requests. for City employees (see page 3).
CITY OF TEMECULA
ADMINISTRATIVE TRAVEL: POLICY AND PROCEDURE
It is the policy of the City to reimburse City officials and designated City staff for the
expenses of travel related to City business according to the statement of policy and
procedures set forth below.
POLICY
Administrative travel is limited to the following classifications of expenditures for the
benefit of the City in connection with "out-of-City" trips:
A. Authorized Travelers
Except for elected officials, Commissioners, and Council-appointed
employees, attendance at conferences shall be limited to one
representative of the City. The City Manager may authorize the
attendance of additional City employees, if deemed appropriate, if travel
funds are available in the department's operational budget. Any number
of elected officials, Commissioners or Council-appointed employees may
attend conferences provided that funds for such purposes are specifically
provided for, and included within the annual departmental budget. In the
absence of an annual appropriation, such travel must receive
authorization in advance of expenditure by the City Council.
Conference travel for employees shall be limited to department heads,
assistant department heads, division heads or positions of highly
technical or professional nature as designated. In all cases, specific
travel expenses must be justified in the annual departmental budget and
approved by the City Manager. Every effort shall be made to avoid the
simultaneous absence of both the department head and the assistant
department head·
B. Transportation
Use of air, train, taxi, private .Car or bus shall be selected on the basis of the
least total cost to the City after all expense items are tabulated. Analysis
should be made based upon travel time versus actual salary costs lost 'by
commuting.
Authorized travel time shall be based on that required by the most appropriate
mode of public transportation.
When the use of private automobile is approved, reimbursement shall be at the
current IRS mileage rate.
When City vehicles are used, a credit card can be obtained for-&ll routine
kUVORTONLtMANU/J,3tlglVELPOL I Of.f 10/04/9~
purchases of gasoline and oil. On the Travel Expense Report, the notation
should state "City Vehicle Used". If any repairs are necessary, they will be-
reimbursed upon presentation of the necessary receipts. The use of City
vehicles should be included on the Travel Expense Report at the current mileage
rate allowance and then deducted as an expense paid directly by the City.
When the use of public air carrier transportation is approved, travel for all
personnel shall be in coach class or equivalent service. Private automobile use,
to and from the airport, shall be reimbursed for all miles at the current rate as
stated above. Day parking, as well as taxis to and from the airport, will be
reimbursed only with receipts.
While traveling, the use of rental vehicles should be limited. Courtesy shuttle
service, buses, or limousine service should be utilized between airports and
meeting locations whenever possible. Rental vehicles will be permitted when
alternate transportation would be more expensive or impractical. When rental
vehicles are used, economy vehicles should be utilized or those vehicle Sizes
adequate to seat multiple City travelers comfortably.
Lodging
Lodging shall be obtained at the most economical rate available for safe, clean
and quality accommodations. Lavish or oversized accommodations cannot be
justified. Conference headquarter hotels are encouraged, as they reduce the
costs of other modes of transportation between meetings and conference sites.
Lodging expenses and meals for spouses or other family members are not
reimbursable. Any such additional expenses must be paid for by the City
officer or employee directly, or in advance of scheduling, if the City makes
travel arrangements.
Businessrelated telephone charges which are added to the lodging bill may be
reimbursed. Reimbursement shall be made for two (2) telephone calls of a
personal nature for each full day of travel, not to exceed $10.00 per day.
Reimbursement for lodging shall be at the actual cost of lodging for the City
officer or employee only, including related taxes and service charges.
Other Expenses
1. Registration:
Actual cost of registration will be reimbursed if paid by the City officer
or employee. To the extent possible, pre-registration should be used and
costs paid directly by the City in advance.
2. Reimbursement Limit:
A "reimbursement limit" amount of $50 Per day for each full day
involved in travel on City business for distances over 45 mileS from the
City limits is authorized. A "full day" is defined as travel and training
involving more than five consecutive hours of travel and conference
time. Less than five consecutive hours is defined as a half day; the
"reimbursement limit" amount will then be computed at half rate.
Receiots are re(iuired.
"Reimbursement limit". will cover all expenses other than registration,
transportation, and lodging.
A "reimbursement limit" amount of $100 per day is approved for travel
to the following cities: New York; San Francisco; Chicago; and
Washington D.C.
PROCEDURE
A. Travel Authorization: Annual Budget
Business or conference travel requests estimated to exceed $100 shall be
submitted with the department's annual budget request, on the appropriate
travel and training request form. Scheduled business travel within.the state
requiring more than one day, and requests for travel out of state require City
Manager authorization for City employees.
B. Forms Reauired
The Finance Officer shall establish such forms as are necessary and appropriate
to provide accurate records of travel requests and travel expense
reimbursement in accordance with City policy and IRS reporting requirements.
All travel forms must be completed in advance and contain the necessary
signatory authorizations.
No reimbursement will be provided without receipts.
C. Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
Compensation requirements with respect to time spent in attending lectures,
meeting, training programs or similar activities during work time shall be
counted as working time only if authorized in advance and in writing by the
City Manager. No such authorization shall be given unless the lecture, meeting,
program or other activity is directly related to improving the employee's ability
to perform his/her current job.
Time spent in attending lectur. es, meetings, training programs and similar
activities shall not be counted as working time where such attendance is
outside of the employee's regular working hours exceot in situations where the
employee is directed by his/her department head to attend such lecture,
meeting, training program or similar activity. In this case, employees, entitled
to overtime shall be compensated in accordance with the approved :Personnel
kWORTONL~,~,S12PjVZ~.POL .{ ojr5 ZCVO~N3
Rules and Regulations with respect to overtime.
Travel Time
Time spent by an employee traveling between the employee's residence and
the regular work place is not work time and shall not be treated as hours
worked.
Where an employee is requested by his/her department head to 'travel outside
the City, time spent traveling between the employee's home and assigned
destination shall be treated as time worked only to the extent that it exceeds
the amount of time normally taken by the employee to travel between his/her
residence and regular City work place.
Definitions
City when used shall mean the City of Temecula.
Conference Travel shall be defined as travel to attend meetings or conferences
that are primarily for the educational or professional enrichment of the
participant and not to transact specific business of the City, but for which the
City will receive a secondary indirect benefit.
Business Travel shall be defined as travel at which attendance of the participant
is required to conduct specific items of City business.
Elected Official means a member of the City Council.
Commissioner means any person appointed by the City Council to an officially
established advisory board, commission, committee or task force of the City.
City Emolovee means any person regularly employed by the City on a full-time
basis, elected officials and members of advisory commissions or boards.
Council-Appointed EmDIovee means an employee appointed by and directly
responsible to the City Council,
R..tNOm'ONLLUrANU, a. Sl/P,j~Z. POL 40f$ 101041~
10.
11.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
Utilize this form for all Transactions involving training and Travel requests in
conjunction with approved training.
Utilize. this form for all mileage reimbursements in conjunction with City
business.
All mileage will be reimbursed at the current IRS rate.
Prepaid column is for those expenses paid in advance through the City
Purchase Requisition/Purchase Order process.
Cash allowances column is for those monies paid to traveler directly.
Receipts must accompany form if reimbursement is requested.
Forms may necessitate. completion before and after travel, depending upon
nature and amount of reimbursements requested.
Authorized signatures must be secured orior to submittal to Finance. If not
secured, forms will not be processed.
Department heads may approve travel expenses and reimbursements up to
$1 O0 without City Manager approval.
Items not reimbursable
Items specifically prohibited include reimbursement for oersonal items. alcoholic
beverages. except as noted below. non-business related entertainment. meals
included in the registration or air travel fee. and meals in connection with half-
day or one-day training seminars. Expenses incurred by the employee's family
are also prohibited·
It is understood that in certain business settings it is appropriate for the City
Council or Council Members to include alcoholic beverages in expense
reimbursements, with the City Manager's approval.
Submissions of Travel Expense Report.
Travel Expense Reports must be submitted to the Finance Department within
ten (1 O) working days after the trip is concluded.
~'~ORTONLWANUAL~T~V~..POL 50.f~ 10/0~
ITEM
NO.
7
APPROVAT.
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
October 12, 1993
Award Bid to Pave Easement Access Roads and Repair
P.C.C. Sidewalks at Via Lobo Channel
PREPARED BY: ~ Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council award a contract for paving an access road and repairing P.C.C.
sidewalk at Via Lobo Channel to Nelson Paving end Sealing, the lowest responsible bidder, for
the sum of $19,930.00.
BACKGROUND:
In July of 1993 the Public Works Department in conformance with standard City purchasing
procedures requested and received informal bids from three contractors for the following
scope of work.
· Excavate and compact native soil as needed in order to place base material in area
approximately 11,460 sq.ft.
2. Place ground sterilizer prior to placement of base material.
Furnish and place 6" ( + or -) of class #2 base material in area approximately 11 ~460
s~l. ft.
Furnish and place 4" (+ or -) of A/R 8000 asphalt material in area approximately
11,460 sq. ft.
5. Remove 47' of 5' wide sidewalk4" concrete and dispose of legally.
Replace 47' of 5' wide of 4" concrete on native soil.
pwl 5~gdrpt%S3~,0928%pevebid.brd
The bids received were as follows:
Nelson Paving & Sealing, Perris
Monteleone Excavating, Murrieta
Del Rio Construction, Temecule
$ 19,930
$ 23,000
$ 39,818
Nelson Paving and Sealing has performed work in the past for the City of Temecula, Public
Works Department and we have found their work to be satisfactory. In addition, they can
proceed with the work upon notification of Council award and completion of necessary
contract documents.
This work to be performed is necessary for rubber tire emergency equipment to access Via
Lobo Channel during the "Rainy Season" for removal of sediment and restoration of the
channel. In the past, only tracked equipment could access the channel during the "rainy
season" and was limited to pushing silt/debris to the sides of the channel creating a condition
of stockpiled silt/debris to be removed when earthen roads .were stable enough for access.
Paved roads will allow rubber tire trucks to haul-away any silt and debris that will collect in
the channel.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds are available in the Public Works Department Street Maintenance Account #100-164-
999-5402 for the proposed scope of work on Via Lobo Channel.
Attachments: Sketch and location of work to be performed
pwl 5~agdrpt~93~O928%pavebid.brd
ITEM
NO.
8
APPROV~x.
CITY ATTORNEY ~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
/11~.Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
October 12, 1993
Award Bid to Construct · Single Concrete Box Culvert st
28960 Ynez Road
PREPARED BY.: b4~'Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council award contract for construction of a single concrete box culvert located
at 28960 Ynez Road to Monteleone Excavating, the lowest responsible bidder for the sum of
$12,450.
BACKGROUND:
In September of 1993 the Public Works Department in conformance with City's current
purchasing procedures requested and received informal bids from three (3) contractors for the
following scol~e of work:
1. Remove and dispose of legally existing structure with two 24" culverts.
2. Install one (1) concrete box culvert 3' height by 5' width by 24' length.
Hydrology calculations indicated that the two 24" existing CMP's were undersized and did not
allow smooth passage of water run-off along and around this portion of Vellejo Channel. This
project will eliminate the two 24" CMP's and should relieve the Maintenance Division from
removing silt and debris from portions of the channel and road after every rain storm. Also,
the Public Works Department is pursuing reimbursement for this project through the State of
California Hazard Mitigation, FEMA and Office of Emergency Services proposal process.
pwl b"~agdrpt~3~1012~culveft.bkl
The bids received were as follows:
Monteleone Excavating, Murriete
Del Rio Construction, Temecula
Utah Pacific Construction, Murrieta
~12,450
~12,983
$13,250
Monteleone Excavating has performed work in the past for the City of Temecula, Public Works
Department and we have found their work to be satisfactory. In addition, they can proceed
with the work upon notification of Council award and completion of executed contract
documents.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds are available in the Public Works DepBrtment Drainage Facilities account #100-164-
999-5401 for the proposed scope of work at 28960 Ynez Road.
Attachments: Attachment "A" Map of Location
pw 15%egdrpt%93%1012%culvert.bid
ITE'M
NO.
9
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
APPROV]~T.
CITY ATTORNEY ~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
October 12, 1993
Award Bid to Install Three 36" X 40' CMP's at Two Locations of John
Warher Road
I
PREPARED BY: ,~i~ Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council award a contract for road grading and of installing three 36" X 40'
CMP's at two locations on John Warner Road to Monteleone Excavating, the lowest
responsible bidder for the sum of $22,950.
BACKGROUND:
In September of 1993 the Public Works Department in accordance with City purchasing
procedures requested and received informal bids from three contractors for the following
scope of work.
i. Excavate and import approximately 2,000 CY's of fill material, place and
compact.
2. Install three 36" X 40' CMP at two locations and grout for backfill.
3. Furnish and install rip rap grouted with five sack P.C.C. at inlet and outlet of
CMP's.
The bids received were as follows:
1. Monteleone Excavating $22,950
2. Del Rio Contractors ~34,293
3. Utah Pacific Construction $41,500
pw 15%egdrpt%93%1012%wernerrd .,,gn
Monteleone Excavating has performed work in the past for the City of Temecula, Public Works
Department and we have found their work to be satisfactory. In addition, they can proceed
with the work upon notification of Council award and completion of necessary contract
documents.
This work to be performed is necessary to ensure safe. passage during the rainy season for
home owners located in this area, emergency vehicles and solid waste collection. The work
to be performed will include, the grading of John Warner Road from Cabrillo to Santiago Road
to direct rain run-off or nuisance water to the south-easterly side of street where newly
constructed earthen drainage swales will direct it to the newly installed culverts. This project
will not eliminate muddy or slippery conditions during wet weather, however the installations
of culverts will prevent the erosion that eliminated access to thirteen (13) home owners during
the ,rainy seasons". During the Fiscal Year 1992-93 the Public Works Maintenance Division
spent approximately $7,896 in efforts during the "Rainy Season" trying to ensure' safe
passage on John Warner Road. The work to be performed will not only relieve the Public
Works Maintenance Division of continued emergency maintenance on this section of road, but
will fit with the future design work to be performed on John Warner Road. Construction time
on this project is four working days. Also, the Public Works Department is pursuing
reimbursement for this project through the State of California Hazard Mitigation, FEMA and
Office of Emergency Services proposal process.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds are available in the Public Works Department Street Maintenance Account #100-164-
999-5402 for the proposed scope of work to be performed on John Warner Road.
Attachments: Location of work to be performed
pwl 5~gdrlet~93~,1012~,wemerrd.eg,
1t f~ I']
'ttll
r
m
OX~
ITEM N O. 10
APPROVAl
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Community Services Board of Directors
Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services
October 12, 1993
Contract Amendment No. I for Professional Services Industrial Inc. for
Materials Testing at the Community Recreation Center, Project No.
92-029B
PREPARED BY: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve Contract Amendment No. I for additional material testing to
Professional Services Industries, Inc. for the construction of the Community Recreation
Center, Project No. 92-029B, in an amount not to exceed $15,000.
DISCUSSION:
Material Testing services for this project were chosen by soliciting qualified local individuals
and firms to participate in an interview process. Professional Services Industries (PSI) was
chosen as the best candidate for this project. They were requested to prepare an estimate
of the probable materials testing services, based on the requirements of the Uniform Building
Code (UBC), for the project. The plans were reviewed to identify the different types of
construction materials to be used as well as a discussion with the General Contractor
concerning the overall approach to the project. An estimated scope of services was then
prepared by PSI for field inspection, materials testing, and soil compaction services for the
various construction materials in the amount of $11,925.
However, additional testing services were required for the concrete, steel fabricator and other '
material suppliers due to the contractor's scheduling for a project of the size and scope of the
CRC. All additional hours associated with these testing services have been reviewed and
documented by our on-site project coordinator.
Therefore, additional services are necessary to provide the required material testing to comply
with the UBC. The additional scope of services to be provided include testing the structural
steel frame members both at the fabrication shop and field installation, concrete and masonry
units, soil compaction for the foundation, and parking lot areas in an amount not to exceed
$15,000. · -
pwO51agdq~t~3%1012~mend~ro.no1 1012
FISCAL IMPACT:
The coat of the additional material testing services will not exceed $15,000. Sufficient funds
for Amendment No. I to provide professional services for material testing are available from
TCSD bonds in Account No. 250-190-129-5804.
pwOS~idrpt~93%1012~rnendere.nel 1012
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TESTING AND INSPECTIONS
ESTIMATED SCOPE OF SERVICES
Rancho California $port Park
I. INXPECTION .SERVICES
Special Inspection - Concrete
Total. 2~j hour~ @ $30/hour
S,z~'ial Inspection- Shop Welding (National City Shop)
Total. 32 ~urs @ $30/htmr
Special Inspection - Field' Welding & High Strength Bolting
TotaL' lll houn@
3,330.00
II. MATERIALS TESTING
Compression Te. vtin8- Concrete
Tatat. 33 c/,ht~ @ ta2/each
Comp~'on T~tit~g- Mortar & Grout
TotaL' 28 ,r~ @ $12/eat~
C.
Reinforcing Steel - Tensile & Bend. Test
Total.' 12 tests @
ReinJbrch~ Steel- Tensile & Hardness
TotaL' l set @ $160
IIL SOILS COMPACTION SERVICE~
St,. Soils Tw. Jmician for Buildin8 Pad and Footin8 com. vaction tests (asatme. v
rna~ grading fill controZ/compaction alrutdy t~rformed by others)
TOTAL FF2' FOR ADDITIONAL $ER~ TO DATE
PLFA$E ~..LOW' FOR MISCSi2.ANF. OUS INSPECTIONS TO
COMPLETE PROJECT PER DI.~CD'~ION.
TOTAL FEE FOR ADDrHONAL
$15,001~00
~ jar/mr/30037
ITEM NO. I 1
CITY ~.TTOI~EY
FII~eXNC~ OFFICER
CITY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
City Clerk
October 12, 1993
Public/Traffic Safety Commission Appointment
RECOMMENDATION: Review the Ad-Hoc Committee recommendations and appoint two
applicants to serve a full three-year term on the Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission.
BACKGROUND: Pursuant to Council's adopted policy and procedure for making
appointments and re-appointments, the expiration of the terms of Commissioners Steve
Sander and Deborah Holliday was advertised in two local newspapers of general circulation.
The applications received were forwarded to the Council's Ad-Hoc committee members for
the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, and Councilmember Parks and Mayor Pro Tem Roberts
have recommended the re-appointment of H. Steve Sander and the appointment of Charles
A Coe.
Attached are copies of the applications which were received by the filing deadline of
September 5, 1993.
ATTACHMENTS: Copies of Applications for Appointment
CITY OF TEMECULA
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSION
Qualification Requirement: Resident of City of Temecula
COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE:
YEARS RESIDENT
OF TEMECULA: / '/~'--
HOME PHONE: ~"~D'~,,) (~ -r4(~ 2 5'
WORK PHONE:
?
OCCUPATION:
E~E~7'R,~.~ /c.. ~',,,j~
EM PLOYERIADDRESS:
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES:
LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH:
YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE: :- -
..... :, - . ...... -,-~ ---. "7 .
ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: {Professional, techn~al, community, service):' .~:L .. :.:.::.
BRIEFLY STATE WHY ..yOU .WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION.-AND WHYs_YOU-Z--:~:::.~!;~*'**:
,ELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSrrION.~ BE SPECIBC ;U,, ,ddeo~d*"~ ','T,~'.~i:.:..Zi~Z.: ~'
' ' .... · ~ ..... ' ...... ' ......... ...~. ,.. ~ - ..........L-: ,.:'~=.:::... :...~._.,., ~/;'~.:~-7':, "-
I form may be verified. I consent to the release of this ~,~:/u[
understand the, y or all info this _ ..
inform ' n for publi ';""--'~" "': "'- ': ' '.':'-* '* ~* '~'- '= 7-*' .........-':"::::'::*~'*~ ~::' :~!:.~'~:~'~-:!~"7~
· ~ .:, . :,...-.. ~...:
':~ DATE: ~; ~ -~: '/~ "~ ~:'* .....":' .....
SIR for consideration of future vacancies
Drive, Temecula, CA 92390 (714) 694-1989 . .-
CITY OF TEMECULA
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSIO~y
Qualification Requirement: Resident of City of Temecule
COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE:
NAME:
ADDRESS:
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
H. Steve Sander YEARS RESIDENT
WORK PHONE: same
HOME PHONE: 909-699-6921 ..: :- .......
OCCUPATION: A r. c h i t e c t / C o n s u I t a n t,
EMPLOYENIAODRE~,~i:- Self-employed / Adress as above
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUNDIDEGREE~:
· See page ~-1, attached.
LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH --:: :'::::'! ':""'
YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE:..: ,'" ;_--: ,,-' .:'" -:, ._, .- - ': .-
· :
.... .......... See. page ~. 2, attached ,' - -- -.: · . ....... -
................... : '7 ': ..... .":" ' 7. :' .'i .......................... ..............
.................. . .......... -... ..... :-
- -- ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: IPmfesslnal, techn~al, ~m~, sew~l: '
. ,- . - .... : - -. . . . . , . '-, :.-
'' -':". :~"7 .:.--'.7 :: "-:7:-': :::' "':'7 ::::"'~:'~ .':'7:.7:' :~ ~'e"'P a ~e"'{~":f;: :~-'~' ~'~ ~"~
.,* . .... ~, ..:.__-~
_ ._ BmBLY STATE WHY YOU WmSH T.O. SER~ ON TH~S COMM~SmON.. AND WHV-..YOU.~L~.2~;-
BEL!~ YOU ARE QUaRED FOR THE POS~ION. · BE SPECIFIC-{Use 'iddai~n~l
: "necessa~l: ' '>':""' ' .......~' "- '-"":' '-'- .... '-.":-;'- ....... -- - ~e .- --, -. '.-"~:~::';::-
. Having ' served as' a Planning ' Professlo 1:- ~ 'tree TTears~.:{~:~,~<:::-
- ' '-:: '.' on t~i s Co~i ss ion, I wi sh :t0. :.'apply .,'fo~ :':reza'~p~ntment.
In the short time 'since' in6o~pOr~tion'more""has'beeff:acCOmpifshed"::,::'~::~;~m:~
- -forthe"improVement:of Traffic,Fire.and Pol'i6~':p'r0tection'.th~L'.'i~'r~U'.~t~:~e~
· : ':: I' firmly' belieVe':~hat: it ~is' :possible '~:to":'achieVe"even"'TgreaterO'~e;
' . · effec~ivenes's :'g~'in::' future:'./for'~'the"~.~enefft C~6'f-'::th~:::&l t ize;~s '.-of~.:.T~6'~l'a~:]~:~,:
" ,'- : ' j ~ F:. :' ":' =-: j.'~..': ,.:j~ .'.= ~ 1~:..-~: ~. ~ ........ ' ':,T~ '~ ~'='_ :'~ .2 ":"= ~'?~ "'-' ~' '~ ".- ""'-'-;'-' :' '~'~= *-';~"~',"~'~-.'~--~"'
- I unde~d ~m ~y or dl ~om on ~ fo~ ~ ~ vexed..-I cons~
P~SE NOTE: ~i~s wi be ~pt ~ ~e for conside~ ~ ~ va~nc~. ,
Remm ~: C~ Ge~'s O~e, ~174 ~s~m Pa~ D~e, Ternrole, ~ 9~90 .(714) 6~19~ - .'.:,' ,~: .: :. ':.
-,: ,-...-.. : .- .. , .~ .... '_':'.' .,- .. -:.-'.:
2/forms/COM-O01 ·
QUALIFICATION RESUME
APP. pg ~ 1
ArchiteCt and Planner in all fields and phases of
activities connected with 'the planning, design and
construction supervision of buildings including
administration of Archire c t- Engine e r firm·
EDUCATION:
REGISTRATION:
PROFESSIONAL
MEMBERSPIIPS:
INDEPENDENT
P RAC TIC E:
Dipl.-Ing. (Iv[. Arch. ) Technical Unive rsity, Pi~-rmover,
Cerrna.uy, graduate work in City Pla.n.uing.
Fallout Shelter Analysis Course, Fort Huehome,
California.
Germany, Oregon, California C?1345
Arnerica=x institute of Architects '
Architects of Glendale to 1974
Construction Specifications Institute ,, ,,
Incorporated Association of Architects and Surveyors," 1958
London, England
,
Architect-Partner tn Architect-Engineer fi~,-
~98o-1974
Own firm 1959 - 1960, 1946 - 1947 ~984- Present
.i
EMPLOYMENT
RECORD:
Daniel, M=--, ~ohnson & MendenhaI1, Los Angeles
Project Architect 1958 - 1959
Kanner-Ma},er & Associates
Associate Architect 1947 - 1957
Neptune & Thomas Architects
Pnl}ect Manager 1974-1984
H. STEVE SANDER, A.I.A.
! t~ H I T E C
T A N D
P L A N N E R
CIV:C ACTIVITIES
AND
MEMBERSHIPS:
APP.
La Crescenta Home Owners Assn - Vice Pres.
La ~rescenta Citizens Council, Board Member
"Montrose Beautiful" Orgamization - Chairman
"Gaveliers" Toastmasters of La Canada - Pres.
Descanso Gardens Master Plan Steering Corn.
Kiwanis Club, Montrose - COrn. Chairman
C res centa-Canada (Behrens) Hospital,
Steering & Site Selection Corn. Chairman
La Canada Presbyterian Church,
Landscape Corn. - Chairman
Deacon
La Canada Valley Beautiful - Chairman
La Canada Parks and Recreation District -
Chairrman elect
Foothill Conservation and Planning League -
Co-chairman
Flying Samaritans Inc., thai.nan,
Los Angeles Chapter
Townhall - Los Angeles .
La Mision Association-Board Member
Architecture for tlealtb Committee
-Chairman, San Diego/AIA
University Community Planning Group
-Exec, Cornmitt ee Member
Archaeological Institute or America
-President tSan Diego 'Society
San Diego Energy Recovery Project~
-Nember~ Architectural Review
Committee~ City/Count~ or
URBAN DESIGN ELEMENTs Subcommittee UCPG
Chairman/Liaison ~o San Diego City
Planning Department
California Institute of Peruvian Studies
San Diego Independent Scholars
- Board Member(Treasurer)
TEMECULA
:
Garden Club, Rose Society, Art Leaque,
Christ ' s Church Presbyterian
OLD TOWN TEMBCULA SPECIFIC PLAN
STEERING COMMITTEE
CITY OF TEMECULA
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSIONER
H..STEVE.SANDER, A.I.A.
R C H-- t T E
C T A N D P L A
Pg.~,2
1948-50
1951-52
1960-61
1959-60
1961-6Z
1961-68
196Z-63
1955-59
1961-63
1963-68
1969
1968-70
1971
1958
1978-85
1984-86
1985-88
· 1985-87
1985-87
1986-88
1988-present
1992--"-
1992-93
1990-93
N N' E
CITY OF TEMECULA ~--'~,....~.E..i"
Qualification Requirement: Resident of City of Temecula
WISH TO SER E:
NAME: d~~ ~- C~ Y~RS RESIDENT
ADDRESS: ~d~
OCCUPATION:
EDUCATIONAL BACK~ROUNDIDEG ES: ~,' ~,
RE /_- ._
LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COU;Y OR OTHER CITY COMMi~EE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH,
YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE Y~R OF SERVICE: ~ - " ' ..' "..." ' "' ~' ~ ' '(; :.~-'~ '~'
......... · ""~..
ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical., commune, seRiceh
BRIEFLY STATE WHY-YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY ,~OU
I unde~tand ~ ey or dl ~o~ ~ ~b fo~ ~ ~ vebd.-:l conlint ~ ~e rdease ~-ffib.~~~
P~SE NO~: Applic~ons wil be ~ ~ ~e for considemion ~ ~e vacancies, '-- :"((-~-:~,~: ~":"
'Return to: C~ Oerk's Office, 43174 ~siess Pa~ D~e, Temecula, CA 9~90 (714)~-1989
- " ' ~' ': ' ' ' 'L...
. . i. -L'. ' ' ..: 7:'.'.': ::~'.~-':: :-' ~-_ '
Charles A. Coe
30554 Greenway Circle
Temecula, CA 92592
909-676-7408
OUAtlFICATIONS TO SBRVB 0~ PUBtIC/TRAFFIC SAFRTY COMMISSION
AS A RBLATIVBLY NEW RBSIDBNT
My family and I moved to Temecula in November of 1991 from
Long Beach, CA. We moved here for many of the same reasons
that a lot of Temeculans had when they came here: clean air,
open spaces,, civilized llfe styles, less crime, good schools,
and an opportunity to GROW with the community.
As a concerned and active resident of Long Beach I found it
very frustrating, if not depressing, that positive changes
affecting safety and the quality of life seemingly never took
place. It was the view of many that most of these problems
were caused by the City's forefathers poor plannlng.
I hope to be involved in Temecula's growth early enough to
help keep some of the problems I saw in Long Beach from.
happening here.
AS A FATHBR
As the father of a 5 year old son I want to help make certain
that the promise Nancy and I saw in Temecula as the right
place for Alexander to go to school and grow up can be kept,
and the dream of a better lifestyle for the three of us and
all of TemecUla can come true.
Also, as'a father of a boy who will soon ride a bicycle and
then (probably too soon for his mother and I) drive a car, I
want to help make the roads, streets and highways of Temecula
as safe as they can be.
· AS A BUSINBSSMAN
As a recent investor and limited partner in a local business,
ACES DRIVING SCHOOL, I have considerable interest in the
proper planning and safe design of Temecula's streets and
business accesses.
ITEM NO. 12
ORDINANCE NO. 93-17
AN ORDINANCE OF TRE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY
OF TEMECULA REPEp, IJnTG ORDINANCE NO. 93-13
WHEREAS, on July 27, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted
Ordinance No. 93-13, entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-13
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, AIrlENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE
CITY FOR ~ CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION CONTAINF~D
IN PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA934)04~, CHANGING THE
ZONE FROM R-R (RURAL RESIDe) TO C-P-S, (SCENIC
mGHWAY COMMERCIAL) ON PROPERTY LOCATEn ON THE
SO~ST CORNER OF YNEZ AND WINCHESTER ROADS,
AND KNOWN AS A PORTION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBERS 910-130-046 AND 910-130-047
WHEREAS, on August 24, 1993, the Petition entitled "REFERENDUM AGAINST
ORDINANCE NO. 93-13" was submitted to the Office of the City Clerk of the City of
Temecula;
WREREAS, upon examination of said petition by the Registrar of Voters of the County
of Riverside, it was found to contain 2,404 total signatures of which 1,450 signatures were found
to be valid and 455 insufficient. the remaining 499 signatures were not checked having reached
the requisite amount of valid signatures;
NOW, TI-IEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby ordains that,
pursuant to Elections Code Section 4055, Ordinance No. 93-13 is ulnaled.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this 12th day of Oclober, 1993.
ATTEST:
L Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Ords 93-17 -1- '
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF EMECULA).
I, ~une S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 93-17 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the 28th 1993, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly
adopted and passed a regular'meeting of the City Council on the 12th day of October, by the
following roll call vote:
COUNCIL~-~ERS:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Ords 93-17 -2-
ITEM NO. 13
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVA
CITY ATTORNEY ~.~,
FINANCE OFFICER '
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning'
October 12, 1993
Appeal of Planning Commission Denial of Tentative Tract Map No. 25338,
Amendment No. I - A 28 Unit Condominium Project on 2.56 Acres
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING
THE APPEAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 25338, AMENDMENT NO. 1,
UPHOLDING PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP NO. 25338, AMENDMENT NO. 1, TO SUBDIVIDE A 2.56 ACRE
PARCEL INTO A 28 UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-330-050.
BACKGROUND
This item was continued from the September 14, 1993 City Council meeting at the request
of the applicant (reference Attachment No. 1 ).
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
Attachments:
Request for Continuance, September 14, 1993 - Page 2
City Council Staff Report, September 14, 1993 - Page 3
Resolution No. 93- - Page 4
R:\S~'TA~33rrM.CC2 9/21/93 klb 1
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE
SEPTEMBER 14, 1993
R:\S~STAFFItFT~338TM.CC2 9/21/93 k.lb 2
City of T~me:,_, ia
June Greek, CIty C;erk
z3!80 Business Park Dr. Ste. 200
P. O. Box 3000.
Temacu ]a, .CA 92390
Na,.vb~ .y Dark, :A ~' 320
","" Se2 14 lcg't
P.~2K ( g ,,, l ggg
Dear ~s. Greek: ......-,
Please request the City Counsel :o grant a continuance on :onight's
nearing cantern!rig :he propose[ - Cevelopmen~ at Soiana Way and Rye[rest Ave.
Tract P1ap 25]]8. i am unable :o artera because I will be ~.ied ,jr wi.:Y~ my
attorney all day yes:eray and toay.
- Becaus~ of severe f!nanc~al difficulties, ! nave ha: :o seek OankrJar-cy
protee:ion From Chapter I1 The progerry .in Tamecuba ~= current1,, in--.:_-._
foreclosure. M at:err reparlng papers to graven[ the'h~nk from taking "" ::-~
. y eyisp --.. ....... ,._ _
tide :o ~ne lane.. Since mesa rods[ De files immea;ateiy. i: w111 be imposs~gle ....
for me ~o travel to Tamerule. Ob~ious;y.-if; am unaate :o rem~n ownership of ....:'::"
: :'.%Z:'.-' .ft ':'
' the prooar:y, ~he is=us of proj~c:approval_ w!]1 be moot. · "
.... . ...............- .' .......-.. ::-.-:.: .,-~ .-_.i-~4:.--.:: ::---.
--.- - - - :'L" ".L-:.~-:;.:'.---. :::; ,~7_:: -'-:.' ........'-':-- -" -' *': - - -' ' "~ =' ............ : ............... :' "" ......
' - ............. ' .... · '-=' "- ' ': - - ' ....L:.'-~-- ' :' ':" ..:-7"'. '-L_:::". ::.'~'.:"-~-'~"'
"' :'~::~:=-"":'--":-"lf'poss!b !e,"~Fy"~'C schedule'the %next. hear.!ng t~,e:City Course! mee;:1'ngs'
L' '.:::~':2-:-_2~th e' f. u-tu r. e _:so '~,~a'~-we can_.r: e-_-o k;e 'th i~"'~n'a:t.[~ ~-_~W!~.E. the'.~nk r_~j'p t.c(/;Eco[j .r..~
': ' wi11 keep you and !vJr. Fegaa informed of .[he actlon,:_~:..T_hank you f_op...you r_heJp:
_L :.::. ::. "L': ._:.L::-:::::.-'::i:7.:.:~.:.i%L...:. ". :2.2:-2'::. __: LL"-'~22.i .:- '..!::: i: Z: '::::~:~.-:-:.~ :-.--...: -~:Li.::-'?-!L-:.. :?-:'r-~:!..7.7:~-~t':"':::t:':T':~zZ::.'2~::-
.:_.,: L_"'_ __:-': ".'L:2. L'2:~:::--::_..:" , ' :.-': :...--_:-" :z. :::!:-: '::'L'. ,:"::F_"!E:::::.:L:L'z:::::':,L~.' ' ':'..'.':.:j5':.,.L::L:::.::7:'T:~T,:Y: '~7::::":::"!..:::':~..:~:.'--.::'.~:. :':'.
........ . ..... ..... ..............-.:_-..__ .......;...--E.=.:.~:,,:-..-.._:_:.:.,:%.:...=.:7: :.~! :.,.: ::: :-. : .....'...L:"c'S',yT.~!:~:2:'-~:':.~,i.!..~-
.- ........ . .:f-.'.
.. :....:-..'.L: :25incere19,':'.:'" ...........................................':~":':' :':' '
...... . -~-~'.--~'-'.' _,
:: -: , . :'::_Z:-..::_:z' .....:....:.:. :,. · .....:':.~"c~ .....-'-. :':':'-:'-:: ':: ....'~":':"': "':" '::~'- .....:~.*:.i'.'.:: ,,-_::~:'.T :': .
5~~ ..:..2 :::'., ;:::: it.:--_':.:: 7:-77 :--:':."~.-:- 7'7::. "-:-;-.:.:2_':_~:~:_'.'~;~C:Z.
"'~ .... ~'":Z.=:-. ""' ' -:..:-,,.. --"'.'~:7'. :. '
"' '~' ................ "' .................................... ' ","._:L'...j,: ..... jj.-Z,L-;-~':;"-' '.:-
....... ~: - ::-:='~:-===~ee::2.:.'-' ......-- -:.=-..-..-t='-. - :. ....-:~:~..z: .2~_~ ...-.:-~.E.j..:.: ...-:. -.
..7 ........ ' ' ': " '- ........::; '--'~-~-2-':; .~":-
: -. _. 'z '_:-'-:"'7-::: 'E.. - : ':-,:: ': ~7. U ::'_ ,- -..'%-:- _,_ :' :": ...........----. :.-: ............=.--
· · ; .............. - ...........---; .............
.... Le'igh 'Wa.~ man -.--
....
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
SEPTEMBER I 4, I 993
R:\S~TAFFRFI'%~338TM.CC2 9F21/9~3 ]db 3
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY ATTORNb~' .~'
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of PlanningZ:;~
September 14, 1993
Appeal of Planning Commission Denial of Tentative Tract Map No. 25338,
Amendment No. 1 - A 28 Unit Condominium Project on 2.56 Acres
RECOMMENDATION:. The Planning. Commission recommends fiat the City Council:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING
THE APPEAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 25338, AMENDMENT NO. 1o
UPHOLDING PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP NO. 25338, AMENDMENT NO. 1, TO SUBDNIDE A 2.56 ACRE
PARCEL INTO A 28 UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-330-050.
BACKGROUND
Tentative Tract Map No. 25338, Amendment No. 1 was denied by a 5-0 vote by the Planning
Commission at their. meeting on August 2, 1993. The application was submitted to the
Riverside County Planning Department on September 20, 1989 and the project was
transferred to the City of Temecula Planning Department on April 19, 1990. The application
has remained incomplete for approximately four (4) years. Some of the unresolved issues
include the following: lack of a current grading plan for the site, need for an updated traffic
analysis, and no hydrology and hydraulic analysis was submitted. Due to the lack of
cooperation on the part of the applicant with respect to these un~esolved issues, staff brought
the aDl~lication forward to the Planning Commission with a recommendation of denial without
I~rejudice.
The Planning Commission had concerns regarding the amount of time that the project had
been in review with little resolution of identified issues. They also discussed the possibility of
granting the applicant an additional month to submit the materials that Staff had recluested;
however, the applicant could not agree to this time frame due to his current economic
condition. The Commission also had concerns regarding the impact of project traffic and
buffering between the site from existing, adjacent single-family uses.
R:~TAiwI~tJq'~15331TM.CC 9/3/93 IrJb
A number of citizens spoke in opposition to the project. Concerns raised at the public hearing '
by various property owners included: additional traffic congestion in an already congested
area, impacts upon existing school facilities which were already overburdened, and impacts
upon park/recreation facilities. Concerns were also expressed over placing additional multi-
family units within this area.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
Attachments:
2,
3.
4.
Resolution No. 93- - Page 3
Draft Planning Commission Minutes, August 2, 1993 - Page 8
Planning Commission Staff Report, August 2, 1993 - Page 9
Exhibits - Page 10
9.0/93 ]rJb 2
A'I'rACHMENT NO. '1
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
R:~'~eTAFFRP'T'~33rTM.CC 9,/3/93 IrJb 3
ATTACEVIENT NO. 1
RESOLIrIION NO.
A ItE~OLUTION OF TRF~ CITY COUNCIL OF Tur. CITY
OF T~33XA DENYING Tm~* APPEAL OF TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP NO. 25338, AMENDMENT NO. 1,
UPHOLDING PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO
DENY TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 25338, AMENIIVIENT
NO. 1, TO SUBDIVIDE A 2.56 ACRE PARCIn~ INTO A 28
UNIT CONDOB!IN1UM DEVanO~ KNOWN AS
ASS~SOR'S PARCi~* NO. 921-3304B0.
V, rEI]H~EAS, Lcigh Warmart and Dan Sterik filed Teagative Tract Map No. 25338,
Amendment No. I in accordance with the Rivetaide County land Use, Zoning, Plannin~ and
Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by xefea'ence;
WREREAS, said Tentative Tract lv'mp application was not processed in the time and
manner prescribed by State and local hw;
WITEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing pertaining to said
Tract Map on August 2, 1993, at which time in~ persons had oppommity to testify either
in support or opposition to said Tentative Tract Map;
W1TF, REAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Comanission denied said
Tentative Tract lviap;
WITF-REAS, Leigh WaxmE and Dan Sterik filed an Appeal of the Planning
Commission's decision to deny Tentative Tma Map No. 25338, Amendment No. 1 in
accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances,
which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Appeal application Was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public heating pertaining to said Appeal on
September 14, 1993, at which time roterested persons had opportunity to testify either m support
or opposition to said Appeal; and
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Staff Report reganiing the Appeal.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TI~ECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOr .t OWS:
II:~S~eTAFFRP'~7.~331TM:CC 9/3/93 ]rJb 4
Section 1. FindirWs. That the Temecula City Council berry makes the following'
findings:
A. Punnm~t m Government Code Section 65360, a n~wly inco,~,ated city shall
adopt a genenl plan within thirty (30) months following inc~. During that 30-month
period of time, the.city is not subject to the reqni.tdue. at fiat a general plan be adopted or the
req~ents of stat~ law that its decisions be con.i~ent with the gmn'al plan, ff all of the
· following requirements are met:
general plan.
The city is proceeding in a timely ~on with the preparation of the
2. The planning agency finds, in apptoving projects and Inking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, each of the following:
proposed will be consistent with the genend plan F. oposal being ctmsider~i or studied or which
will be studied within a r~asonable time.
b. Titfie is little or no lnobability of mt,stkstial dm'iment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the Froposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable
re~luir~ments of state hw and local ordinances.
B. The Riverside Connty General Plan, as mended by the Southwest Area
Community PIE, (heroinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior m the incorporation of Temecula as
the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its Cvcneml Plan
guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General
Plan.
C. Pursuant to Section 7.1 of County Ordinance No. 460, any subdivision may be
denied ff any of the following findings are made:
and specific plans.
That the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general
2. That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is not
consistent with applicable general and specific plans.
3. That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the
type of development.
4. That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the
proposed density of the development. : -~
· :~"A~33gTM.C~9/3~)3 Ir, Jb 5
5. That the design of the p~posr, d land division or proposed improvements'
are likely to cause substantial envimnmemal darna~ or substantially and unavoidably injure fuh
or wilt, ire or their habitat.
7. That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements
will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at lar~, for access through, or use of,
property within the tn'o~sed land div'~ion. A laud division my be q:q~roved if it is found that
alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and tlmt they will be substat~t½~||y
equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to
easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent
jurisdiction.
D. The City Council, in denying proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 25338,
Amendment No. I, makes the following findings, to wit:
1. There is reasonable probability that Tentative Tract Map No. 25338,
Amendment No. 1 proposed will be consistent with the General Plan p, oposal being considered
or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. The draft General Plan Land Use
Designation for the site is Medium Density Residential (']-12 dwelling units per acre). The
project proposes a residential density of 10.9 dwelling units/acre and is therefore is likely w be
consistent with the Genex'al Plan upon its adoption.
2. There is litfie or no probability of substantlsi detriment to or interfeltmce
with the future adopted general plan ff the proposed use or' action is ultimately inconsistent with
the plan. The draft General Plan Land Use Designation for the site is Medium Density
Residential. Land uses surrounding the site have been identified as residential, with medium
density residential designations W the east and west of the site, low-medium density residential
land uses to the north and hiffh density residential uses w the south.
3. The proposed use or action does not comply with all other applicable
requirements of state hw and local ordinances. The project as proposed is inconsistent with
Sections 5.1 and 5.3 of Ordinance No. 460. In addition, submittal requirements have not been
4. That the site of the proposed land division may not be physically suitable
for the type of development. The preliminary ti~e report indicates that the yropeaty is impacted
by flooding, by a natural stream course, and has restricted access across the entire frontage of ·
Solana Way. No support documents have been received to provide additional information on
the easements and other constraints.
5. That the site of the proposed land division may not be physically suitable
for the proposed density of the development. The preliminary title report indicates that the
property is impacted by flooding, by a natural stream course, and has ~cted access across
the entire frontage of Solana Way. No support documents have been received to provide
R:~STAIq:RPT~5331TM.CC 9~3,~93 IrJb ~
the propc.~ty is impacted by flooding. No support doc.nnen~ hnve been received to provide
additional information on this constraint, therefore, the site may be likely to cause serious public
health problems.
Seaion 2. PASSED, APPROVIi:D AND ADOPTED this 14th day of September, 1993.
SAn lvrr oz
MAYOR
AITF, ST:
June S. Greek, City .Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
crrY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HHRHBY DO cP..Kx'IPY that the
foregoing Resolution No.93- was duly introduced and placed upon the agenda of the City
Council of the City of Temecula on the 14th day of September, 1993, and that thereafter, said
Resolution was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the 14th day of September, 1993, by the following roll call vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:'
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUN~~:
· H.JN~ S. GRtiII
CITYCI-I:reK
R:~'~fAFFR.PT~33rTM.CC 9;'3.,)3 Idb '7
ATTACHMENT NO~ 2
DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
AUGUST 2, 1993
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 9.1993'
11.
It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Blair To close
the public hearing at 7:20 P,M, and approve the Conditional Use Permit, subject to the
amendments set forth by the City Attorney, allowing the use of the Temecula
Showgrounds for motorcross and off-road events including practice and races.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland and Fahey
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
Tentative Tract MaD No. ~5338. Amendment No. I
A proposed 28'ur~it condominium subdivision on 2.56 acres.
Planner Matthew Fagan presented the staff report stating that Planning Staff has
provided wrmen correspondence on numerous occasions giving explicit resubmittal
requirements and has had numerous telephone converselions with the applicant and
one meeting. Staff's concerns included the request for a current grading plan outlining
the topography of the site, an updated traffic analysis, a hydrology and hydraulic
analysis of the site and an amended tentative map. The deadlines set by staff were
agreed to by me applicant, but the applicants resubmittal was not received. Planning
Staff therefore recommended denial of the project, without prejudice, based upon the
analysis and findings in the staff report:
To clarify the term "without prejudice," Assistant City Attorney John Cavanaugh
stated that without prejudice means that the applicant has the right to reapply within
a one year period of time. Commissioner Hoagland inquired as to whether the
applicant would have to begin the permit process from the beginning or could he apply
for a one year extension of time. Mr. Cavanaugh stated that the project would have
to be submitted over again as a new project.
The applicant, Mr. Leigh Waxman, stated that he had not received a copy of the staff
report until the day of the Planning Commission meeting. He also stated that the
project was originally approved through Riverside County and then transferred to the
City of Temecula. Upon the City's recommendation of changing the number of units.
from 32 to 28, the applicant complied and had plans redrawn to meet the request.
The applicant commented on the frequent change in City staff assigned to his project,
referring to the Case Planner Mark Rhoades. and Engineer Bob Righetti.
The applicant requested a one year extension of time, but the Commission reminded
Mr. Waxman that the project had not been approved and therefore could not be
granted the extension.
Commissioner Ford looked at the letter sent to the applicant on October 22, 1993
regarding the submittal requirements in order for Planning Staff to continue its review
of the project. Mr. Waxman stated that he had not seen the letter beforej
R:%S~=tANC~2.13 9/2/13 tie
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
AUt~UST .~. 1993'
12.
Commissioner Fehey suggested · one month extension in order for Mr. Waxman to
clarify with City staff the status of the project. Mr. Waxman requested a two month
extension.
Chairman Ford opened the public hearing at 7:40 P,M.
Jean Clement, 29822 Windwood Circle, Temecula, spoke in opposition to the project
due to the increased number of multi-family units along Solarm Way which would
present an increased problem with traffic flow. Ms, Clement requested single family
detached homes be placed on the property instead of the proposed condominium
project. She also pointed out that there was a lack of playground facilities in the area.
Gall Edwards, 29741 Windwood Circle, Temecula, spoke in Opposition to the project
stating that the proposed project location was the only "buffer zone" between her
home and commercial development. Ms. Edwards commented on the high level of
multi-family housing congestion in the area as well as the lack of view and decreased
value of the homes in the area, She also stated that the areas elementary school had
to add temporary classrooms to accommodate the increased number of children. Ms.
Edwards expressed great concern over the lack of funds the project would contribute
to the school system.
Susan Osborn, 41967 Sherwood Court, Temecula, spoke in opposition to the project
stating that she would like to see the area designated as a perk area.
The al3plicant addressed each of the concerns of the opposed speakers and stated that
his project was in compliance with the City's plan for the area. He emphasized the
I~roposed school fees to be paid for the project equaled $200,000 in fees.
Commissioner Fahey expressed concern over the congestion the proposed project
would bring to the area.
It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Blair to close
the IDublic hearing at 8:00 P.M. and to approve staff's recommendation to deny the
I~roject without prejudice based on the findings contained in the staff report.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoegland and Fahey
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Gary Thornhill stated that the next General Plan Meeting will be held August 17, 1993.
Delays in the project are due to conflicts the City Council has had with certain
meetings. .
R:~S~Pt-ANCOMI~NeCIdlN~2.13 9/2/93 lie I
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION STAff REPORT
AUGUST 2, '1993
R:~S~TA~JII'M.CC' ~/3/~ ]db 9
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING .-
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION.
August 2, 1993
Case No,: Tentative Tract Map No. 25338, Amendment No. I
RECOMMENDATION:
Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner
APPLICATION INFORMATION
ADOPT Resolution No. 93-. denying Tentative Tract
Map No. 25338, Amendment No, I without prejudice,
based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the
staff reDort.
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
Dan Sterick and Leigh Waxman'
Same
A 28 unit condominium subdivision on 2.'56 acres.
The southeast corner of Solana Way and Rycrest Drive.
R-2 (Multiple Family Dwellings)
North: R-2
South:. R-2
East: R-2
West: R-2
(Multiple Family Dwellings)
(Multiple Family Dwellings)
(Multiple Family Dwellings)
(Multiple Family. Dwellings)
Not requested
Vacant
SURROUNDING
LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS
North:
South:
East:
West:
Single Family Residential
Vacant·
Single Family Residential
Vacant
Proposed Units:
Number of Acres {gross):
Density:
28
2.56
10.9 DU/AC
R:~,S~STAFFRPT~25338TM.pC 7/27/~3 Idb 1 ' °
BACKGROUND
The application for Tentative Tract Map No. 25338 was originally submitted to the Riversir--~
County Planning Department on September 20, 1989. The project was transferred to the C,
of Temecula Planning Department on April 19, 1990, The project was originally scheduled
for the Planning Commission meeting of May 6, 1991,
This project was continued off calendar at the May 6, 1991 Planning Commission meeting.
At that meeting, the Commission expressed concerns relative to density, as well as buffering
the site from impacts to adjacent uses, An amended site plan submitted by the applicant
included a reduction of four {4) units to provide a total unit count of 28. The 'item was
scheduled for a Planning Commission hearing on January 6, 1992 because many items which
were previously brought to the applicant's attention remained unresolved. The project was
continued at this time to the February 24, 1992 Planning Commission meeting, The item was
subsequently continued off-calendar at this meeting due to unresolVed issues which remained
unaddressed by the applicant,
Staff provided written correspondence on five separate occasions to the applicant with explicit
re-submittal requirements required in order to process the project. In addition, Staff has had
numerous telephone conversations and one meeting with the applicant regarding these
matters.
Deadlines were set by staff, most of them agreed to by fie applicant, only to see the deadline
dates pass without any re-submittal. The last letter mailed to the applicant informed the
applicant to contact the Planning Department by July 14, 1993 to discuss the status of the
project. The letter further stated that if the applicant did not contact the Planning Department
by this date that Staff would schedule the item for a Planning Commission hearing with a
recommendation for denial "without prejudice". This deadline passed without the applicant
contacting Staff.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The I~roject is comprised of 28 units. The site density is 10.9 D.U./AC. The southeast corner
of the site contains a recreation area for its residents.
ANALYSIS
The project is inconsistent with Sections of Ordinances No. 348 and 460 and City submittal
requirements. These inconsistencies are outlined in a letter to the applicant dated October 22,
1992 (reference Attachment No. 2). Some of Public Works Department concerns included:
reQuesTing a current grading plan for the site which included accurate topography of the site,
an updated traffic analysis, a hydrology and hydraulic analysis of the site, and an amended
tentative mal~. Numerous items listed in Section 5.3 (Planned Developments - Residential,
Commercial and Industrial) of Ordinance No. 460 were needed; therefore, this Section was
included in the correspondence to the applicant.
EXISTING ZONING AND FUTURE GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCy
Existing zoning for the site is R-2 (Multiple Family Dwellings). The project is a proposal for
a twenty-eight (28) unit condominium Project, which is consistent with the current zoning.
R:~S~STAI:FRPT~25338TM.pC 7/27/93 idb 2
The draft General Plan Land Use Designation for the site is Medium Density Residential (7.:12
dwelling units Per acre}.. The project Proposes a residential density of 10.9 dwelling units/acre
and is therefore is likely to be consistent with the General Plan upon its adoption.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
.Tentative Tract Map No. 25338, Amendment No. 1 is statutorily exempt pursuant to Article
18, Section 15270 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA}. CEQA does not apply
to projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
This project was continued off calendar at the May 6, 1991 Pinning Commission meeting.
The item was scheduled for a Planning Commission hearing on January 6, 1992 because
many items which were previously brought to the applicant's attention remained unresolved.
The project was continued at this time to the February 24, 1992 Planning Commission
meeting. The item was subsequently continued off-calendar at this meeting due to unresolved
issues which remained unaddressed by the applicant. Staff has continuously provided written
correspondence to the applicant with explicit re-submittal requirements required in order to
process the project. In addition, Staff has had numerous telephone conversations with the
applicant regarding these matters. Many deadlines were prescribed, most of them agreed to
by the applicant, only to see the deadline dates pass without any re-submittal. Tentative
Tract Map No. 25338, Amendment No. 1 is statutorily exempt Pursuant to Article 18, Section
15270 of the California Environmental· Quality Act (CEQA).
FINDINGS
R:%S~,STAFFRPT~25338TM.pC 7/27/~3 Idb
There is reasonable probability that Tentative Tract Map No. 25338, Amendment No.
1 proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or
studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. The draft General Plan Land
Use Designation for the site is Medium density residential {7-12 dwelling units per
acre). The I~roject proposes a residential density of 10.9 dwelling units/acre and is
therefore is likely to be consistent with the General Plan upon its adoption.
There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the
future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with
the plan. The draft General Plan Land Use Designation for the site is Medium density
residential. Land uses surrounding the site'have been identified as residential, with
medium density residential designations to the east and west of the site, low-medium
density residential land uses to the north and high density residential uses to the south.
The proposed use does not comply with all other applicable requirements of state law
and local ordinances. The project as Proposed is inconsistent with Sections 5.1 and
5.3 of Ordinance No. 460. These Sections require information to be shown on and
verified or accompany tentative maps. Many of the items requested were not
submitted. In addition, submittal requirements have not been met.
That the site of the Proposed land division ma'y not be Physically suitable for the type
of development. The preliminary title report indicates that the property is impacted by
flooding, by a natural stream course, and has restricted access across the entire
3
frontage of Solana Way. No support documems have been received to provide
additional information on the easemerrts and other constraints.
That the site of the proposed land division may not be Physically suitable for 1 ~
proposed density of the development, . The preliminary title report indicates that the
property is impacted by flooding, by a natural stream course, and has restricted access
across the entire frontage of Solana Way, No support documents have been received
to provide additional information on the easements and other constraints, therefore,
the site may not be suitable for the proposed density,
That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements may be
likely to cause serious public health problems. The preliminary title report indicates
that the property is impacted by flooding'. No support documents have been received
to provide additional information on this constraint, therefore, the site may be likely to
cause serious public health. problems,
Attachments:
Resolution No. 93- - Blue Page 5
Letter to Applicant ~'~'~ed October 22, 1992 - Blue Page 10
Exhibits - Blue Page 11
A. Vicinity Map
B. Draft General Plan Designation
C. Zoning Designation
D. Site Plan
R:~S~STAFFRI=T~25338TM.pC 7127/93 Idb 4
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 93-
R:~.S~STAFFRPT~25338TM.pC 7/27/~3 Idb 5 ' '
ATTAC~ NO. 1
PC R-ESOL~ON NO.-93-
A RESOLUTION OF Tnv. PLANNING COktMI~SION OF
Tm~-C1TY OF'r~VIZCtR~DENyING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP NO. '
2S338, AMENDMENT NO. 1 WITHOUT
PRFJUDI CE TO SUBDIVIDE A 2.86 ACRE PARCI~, INTO
A 28 UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEV~ OPMENT KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR ,S PARceL NO. ~r21-330-Oso.
wn~'~As, Dan SW. rick and Leigh Waxman f'ded Terntire Traa
Sub~.n~.m. ent No: 1 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use ZoninMap No..25338,
Am xsmn Ordinances, which the CAty has adolz~ by refexence; ' g, Planning and
~, said Tentative Tract Map application was processed in the time and manner
prescribed by State and local hw;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commi-~sion continued said Tentative Tract Map on May 16,
1991, until January 6, 1992; '
WIIER~, the' Planning Commission continued said Tentative Tract Map on January
6, 1992, until February 24, 1992;
WI~.~, the Planning Commission continued said Tentative Tract Map on January
6, 1992, until February 24, 1992;
W'HT~R. EAS, the Planning Commission continued said Tentative Tract Map off-calendar
at the February 24, 1992 meeting;
V(HEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Tentative Tract lVlap on August
2, 1993, at which time interested persons had an oppormhity to testify either in support or
opposition;
WFi~.~, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission denied said
Tentative Tract Map; ' .
, ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the
following findings:
R:XSXSTAFFRPT~25335TM.pC 7127/93 Idb 6 '
A. Pursuant to Government Code SectionS360, a newly incorporated city:shall
general plan.
The city is proceeding i~ a timely fashion with the preparation of the
2. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, each of the following:
a. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action
proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which
wffi be studied within a reasonable time.
b. There is litfie or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is -Itlmately
inconsistent with the plan.
c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable
requirements of state hw and local ordinances.
'B. .The Riverside County General Plan, as mended by the Southwest Area
Community Plan, (hcrcinaftcr "SWAP*) was adopted prior to the incorporation of Telneath as
the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan
guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General
C. The Planning Commission in denying the proposed Tentative Tract lVlap, makes
the following findings, to wit:
1. There is reasonable probability that Tentative Traa Map No. 25338,
Amendment No. 1 proposed will be consistent with the genera/plan proposal being considered
or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. The draft General Plan Land Use
Des. ignation for the site is Medium density residenth/(7-12 dwelling units per acre). The
project proposes a residential density of 10.9 dwelling units/acre end is therefore is likely to be
consistent with the General Plan upon its adoption.
2. Them is little or no probability of substantiaJ detriment to or idtcdcn.ace
with the future adopted genemJ plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with
the plan. The draft General Plan Land Use Designation for the site is Medium density
residential. Land uses surrounding the site have been identified as residential, with medium
density rc-qdcntial designations to the east and west of the site, low-medium density residenthi
land uses to .the north and high density residential uses to the south.
R:~,S%STAFFRPT~2533STM.pC 7127/93
3. The proposed rue does not comply with all other a i/cable u' ~
· of Ordinance No. 460. These Sections require information to be shown on an~°v~e'~anodr
accompany tentative maps. Many of the items requested were not submined. In addition,
submina] requirements have not been met.
4. That the site of the propo.~ed land division may not be h si '
for the type of development The prerm' title · · P y caL!y sintable
b floodin b ,, ry report m~ .
the easements and other constraints. across the en on
5. That the site of the proposed land division may not be physically suitable
for the proposed density of the development. The prelimkary title report indicates that the
property is impacted by flooding, by a natural stream course, and has restricted access across
the entire frontage of Solana Way. No support documents have been received to provide
additional information on the easements and other constraints, therefore, the site may not be
suitable for the proposed density.
6. That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements
may be likely to cause serious public health problems. The preliminary ti~e report indicates that
the property is impacted by flooding. No supjxm documents have been received to provide
additional information on this constraint, therefore, the site may be likely to cause serious public
health problems.
D. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, the Tentative Tract Map is compatible with
the health, safety and welfare of the community. '
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. Tentative Tract Map No. 25338, Amendment
No. 1 is stamtorily exempt pursuant to Article 18~ Seaion 15270 of the California
EnvLronmentaJ QuaLity Act (CEQA). CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency
rejects or disappwves.
Seaion 3. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this 2nd day of August, 1993.
LINDA L. FAHEY
R:XSXSTAFFRPT',25338TM.pC 7127f93 klb 8
. I HEl~k'Tny CERTIFY that th~ fo~Zoin$ Resohtion was duly adopted by the PlanninZ
Commission of thc City of Temecula ar a re~uhr mee~nE thereof, held on the 2nd day ~
August, 1993 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYF, S:
NOF, S:
ABSI~rI':
PLANNING COh,fiVlISSIpN'ERS:
~G COMMISSlON'EES:
PLANNING COMMISSIOn:
G~Y~ORNI:rrr~,
R:~S~STAFFRPT~25338TM.pC 7/27/~3 ldb 9
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
LETTER TO APPLICANT DATED
OCTOBER 22, 1992
R:~S~,STAFFRPTL?,S338TM.pC 7127/93 kJb 10
CITY
October 2,7., 1992 '
T[
LA
Mr. high Waxman
53 Edgar Court
Newbury Park, CA 91320
SUBJECT:
Planning and Public -Works Deparanent Comments For Tentative Tract Map No.
25338 - a twenty-eight (28) unit condominium project located at me southeast corner
of SoL~na Way and Rycr~ Driv~
This letter shall serve to provide .comments relative to Tentative Tract IVlap No. 25338.' As'a reault
of our meeting on October 15, 1992, the following items need to be submined to the Planning
Depa~'unent in order for Staff to continue its review of the subject project:
Planning Department
1. An mended tentative map which incorporates the following:
Updated names, addresses and telephone numbers of owners and person preparing
the map. '
b. The date that the map was prepared needs to be located in a conspicuous place.
c. A clearly delineated boundary line.
d. Locadons and widths of existing and proposed utility easements.
Any known existing wells on the property or within 220 feet of the subdivision
boundary.
Identification of common areas and open spaces.
The existing zoning of property immediately surrounding the tract.
h. Removal of the contour lines.
A table indicating area and density calculations. The calculation should indicate that
not less man 40% of the net area of the project is used for open area or recreational
facilities. The net area shall be determined by excluding all streets, drives and
automobile storage areas.
R:':L~TA~,",,q331DRC. L.TR
43114 [S$,~NP,,~ PAIIK Drove * Te.,~C...A. CAu~,Om,,u f'/3g0 - PONe (/'14) 694-1~9 "' PAX {714) 694-1~
Page 2
Mr. Waxman
TM 2~338
"Typical" building setback dimensions.
Trash facilkies for the northwest unks. These units will n~d to be sufficiently
screened since they will be located adjacent to Solaria Way.
The location and type of proposed fencing, gates and walls.
An Amendment # needs to be included on the tentative map site plan. The re-
submiual shall be referred to as 'Amendment No. 1."
n. All revisions neea to be enumerated in the revision block.
· Zoning for the site is R-2 not R-3.
p. · Provide dimensions of proposed dwellings, buildings and other struaures.
A conceptual landscape plan which incorporates the following:
Trees along Solarm Way should be a minimum of 24" box, with twenty-five percent
of the trees being 36' box.
b$
Screening for ,the newly located trash facilities. See explanation under No. 1.k.
Additional scr~ning on the eastern portion of the site which is adjacent to the pool
site. This landscaping shall serve as a buffer to the single-family residences n3 the
3. The following additional items need to be addressed:
a. A list of the names and addresses of the owners of real property located within 600
feet of the ene~or boundaries of the property to be considered, as shown on the last
equalized assessment roll, and any update issued by the County Assessor.
Public Works Department
The applicant is expected to address all of the issu/s noted below, and to submit mended maos,
sv, tdie~, and calculations. -
The Tentative Map shall be prepared in accordance with the requirements of Ordinance No.
348 and Section 5.3 of Ordinance No. 460. (See Attached).
R:~TAr'~331 DRC. LT'~
Pa~e 3
Mr. ~axman
TM 25338
The applicant must provide a preliminary hydrology and hyclradic analysis of the overall ~ite
and the storm drain facilities along the southerly border of the property. Existing s=uctures
shall be shown and dimensioned from the property boundazT. The applicanfs proposal to
protect the graded slope and convey storznwnrzz' 'from the adjacent site shall be noted and
des=x'bed on the tentative map. The es-rim~,red peak flows for both the 1-year and 10G-year
event shall be noted for runoff entering and leaving the site. The current proposal to use a
rip-rap down drain from the mite onto the adjacent property is not acceptable'to this
dep~hxxent. Concentrated drainage within the driveways shall be conveyed by concrete
swales or gtnr~.u. The limits of the 100-.year event storm shall be shown in the earthen
channel adjacent to the southerly. boundary. Also, all building pads shall be a minimum of
one-foot above the water surface elevaxion for the 100-yet event as conveyed onsite.
Down slopes from the adjacent properties shall provide for dralnaZe and erosion control. If
walls are to be constructed at the we of slopes, drainage between the wall and slope shall be
conveyed onsite in concrete swales. An acceu gate shall be provided for maintenance.
All easements and rights-of-way shall be accurately ~lotted per the latest preliminary title
report and recorded maps. Copies of all referenced documents from the Title report Mall
be provided to this deparm~nt for reference.
No slope shall be ~eater than 2:1 maximum unless otherwise approved by this department.
The existing topography'as shown on the tentative map shall be current, and shall extend a
minimum of 300 feet both southerly and westerly outside the project boundary. The location
of the existing buildings and other facilities (such as well sites) shall also be shown and
dimev. sioned within 100 fe~.t of the oroverty boundary line. Exhtmg walls and fences shall
also be noted in relation to the prot;err~.' boundary.
The proposed primary access to .this site shall be a minimum of 200 feet from Ryerest Drive.
An updated trafzqc analysis shall be prepared per the City's current* guidelines and shall
c.omply with congestion management and air quality requirements. the study shall a/so
address site distance and turning movements from the proposed driveways and existing
driveways or intersections adjacent to the site. The auolicant's traffic engineer should contact
this depara'nent for copies of our current criteria. AYee of $780 shall be required for review
of the traffic study by the City.
All references to design standards shall be per the City's current Ordinance No. 9t-43. All
drainage facilities shall be per the current smdard drawin~ of the Riverside County Flood
Control District.
Private streer~ shall be designed to match the City;s design requirements.
Page 4
Mr. Waxman
TM 25338
11.
12.
The area subject to flooding as shown on Parcel Map 13271 shall be indicated on the
tentative map.
All lots shall be numbered except. for street right-of-way .and barrier s~rips, which shall be
lettered lots.
13. The Tenazive Map shall be nomci as "For Condorninium Putpones.'
Tenr~zive Trac~ Map No. 25338 is deemed to be incomplexe ar ~is lime. Please submit five (5)
copies of the amended tentative map, three (3) copies of the amended conceptual landscape. plan,
three C3) copies of elevations and floor plans and five (5') copies of mended grading plans within
ten (10) calendar days of the date of thiS le=er to the PlanninE Department Upon re-submittal, Staff
shall conduct a review of these materials and determine if the above mentioned concerns have been
addressed. As per our diScussion at the meeting, you will have sixty (60) days to submit the other
requested materials.
If you have any questions or comments, please call Matthew Fagan at' (714) 69~-6400.
Sincerely,
~ebbie UiDnoske
Senior Planner
Bob Righe=i, Department of Public Works
Mike Grey, Fh'e Department
Gary King, Corm'numv/Services District
Dan Steric
R:'..i~TAFFRF~Z5331 D RC.LTR
SE~TIO~
ARTI~..E Y
TENTATIVE )taPS -.. XNFORZ4ATION REQUIR.~
I'r. HTATXVE SllBDIVISION IdeS. : '-
The' following infomatton shall be, shown on and Verified or accmpany
tentative subdivision maps wit. h any other informatti~n that the Planning
Di rector may dem necessary and reason~le. i'
Tract nuGber, title of map.' Assessor's parcel n~T~ber and legal
description of property, not including tract na~e;
i:
'Na~e, adSross and telephone ntmber'of owner ~nd land divider, and
naq. e, address and telephone n~aber of person preparing map;
Ownership information on additional property owned adjacent or
contiguous to the land to be subdiYided.
4. Approximate total acreage of properliy and lot size, net and gross for
a typical lot and for each irregular lot, overall dimensions, north
arrow, scale and date;
5. Subdivision boundary lane and detailed vicinity map showing
rel attonshi p to surrounding cj..unity;
6. Ha~es, loc,.tions, right-Of-way, widths and improvements of adjacent
streets, alleys, railroads, transmission lines, pipelines; sewers and
existing structures, both above and below ground;
#
7. Na~es, locations, widths of right-of-way for proposed streets, alleys
and eas~nents, and the approximate grades of proposed and existing
streets and approximate's~reet centerline radii of c'*,rves;
E. Streets, al 1 ey;s: and ri ght-of-way provi ding 1 egal access to the
prope. rty;
If private streets art 'proposed, they shall 'be so noted on the
tentail ve map;
10. Ha~es 'of utiltt7 pJrveyors, location~ and widths of existing and
proposed public utility easements: -'
a. When specific areas for r*,bsurfa'ce disposal are rtquired, those
areas snal 1 be del I neared.
13.
14.
IS.
1~.
'Any binown existing wells on the property or within 200 feet of
the subdivision boundary shall be indicated on the tentative mat.
Water- courses, channels, existing c;~l*verts and drain pipes, including
existing and proposed facilities .for control of storm waters; _.
Land subject to overflow, inund,tion. or flood hazard;
Any land or .right-of-way to be ~edicated to publ, ic use;
Identify caanon areas and open spaces;
Proposed lot lines and approxim~.te dimensions;
Adjoining .property and.lot lines;
Haximum contour interval shall be four feet. l~e contour lines shall
extend 300 feet beyond the exterior boundaries of the property when
adjacent property is unimproved or vacant, Copies of
topographic maps are acceptable only w~en ether information is not
available, 'Flood Control and Road Deparlz~ent base maps may be
acceptabl ·,
18. Site Gradi. ng:
Whenever any area of the proposed subdivision has a gradient of
5: or more, as measured between natural contours, the following-
information s~all be shown on, or acc~pany, the tentative map:
(1) The proposed cuts and fills in the subdivision:
(a)' All cut and fill slopes or combinations thereof shall
be made no steeper than 2:1 (two horizontal to one
vertical}, and their height shall be no .greater than
ten feet. Exceptions to these standards may be
permitted as follows:
C~t Slopes- Slope ratios steeper than-2:1 and slope
heights in ex:ess of ten feet vertically shall be
considered if they are reckended to be -safe in a
slol~e stability report written by either 'a registered
soil engineer or a registered.engineering geologist,
The slope stablilt7 report must also include
recu,~,endations far erosion control and landscaping of
the proposed grading. *'
Fill Slopes - Fill slopes ~th heights in 'excess of ten
feet ve~ically {on a slope of 2:1} may be allowed if
· they are-rec~nended tO be safe-in a slope st~hillty
.-
report written by · reVisl:cred soil engineer. The
slope stability repo~ must also lnciuoe
rec=~endatians far er=sian control and landscapin.~ af
the proposed grading.
Based an the slope st, hility report,. fill slope
greater than ten fee_t may need lm be constructed at
more gentle slope ratio (e.g, 3:1 or 4:1), in order
at. hi eve etahilt ty, ..
(b)
Cuts-and fills in areas 'of sd~surface sewage disposal
shall be in at=or=tahoe ~th the sewage disposal
feasibtltty report re-J~-,,endattons.'
(2).."l~e elevBttons of all tndtviduai building pads in the
subdi vi si on;
(3) The elevations at the perimeter of the subdivision;
(4) The relationship to adjoining land and development.
Where'grading will tie into adjacent natural terrain, final
manufactured slopes shall be blended into the existing terrain.
!9. Existing use and zoning of property immediately surrounding tract;
20. Existing zoning, and proposed land use of property (single-family,
multiple-fmily, business, inkstrial);
2n_.
A list of the 'nanes 'and addresses' of the owners' of'real property
located wiShin 300 feet of the ~terior boundaries of the property to
be considered, as shown on the last equalized assessment roll, and any
update issued by-the County Assessor.
F~e.Dor*.s and written statenenl~ of the following matters shall accmpany the
~entati ve map:
Proposed method' of control of storm water, including ~a.ta as to a~ount
of runoff, and the approximate grade and dimensions of the proposed'
'faci 1 i ttes.
A written statment (Land Division Fore S~H 53) from th~ Health
Officer start ng that: ·
A water purveyor under permit has agre-_d in writing to serve all
lots in the land division; or -'
The land divider has an ac=-_ptable application for a water
purveyor permit on file with the De~ari~ent of Public Health or
the ~tate Depar~'~ent of-Health .~ervices.
24
The land divi~r h:'filed with the Health De:ar.~.e:t i:f~rm~tlon
.regardin~ the ~an1:tty and c~allty :f wa~er :f any ~ls ~is:in9
on ~hE pr:per%y, an~ :he ~ima~ed :~n: cos: :f ~rillin9 ~
wel~ on ~he pr~pe~y. --
No water syst~ is provided and is-not. r~ired for this lena
dt vi si on,
A written starmerit (~Land 'Division l:orm SAN -:3)-fruu the Health
Officer statin!) the type of sewage ~isposal that will be permitted.
To aid.in this determination, a sewer feasibility letter, or a sewage
disposal feasibility report and Regional Water Quality Control Boar~i
clearance or other perti.nent information shall be required.
If the lahd all-vision lies within a-special si~.dies zone shown on the map
prepared by the Stat~ Geologist pursuant to the Alquist-Priolo Geologic
Hazard Zone Act, a geologic re~rt or waiver thereof pursuant to the
provisions of Ordinance No. 547 shall acc=mpany the tentative map.
A prograu far control of soil erosion in conformity with Section 14.1 shall
be sumitted for land divisions in blow sand areas.
SECTION 5.2. TENTATIVE PARCE 'MAPS·
The following information shall be shown and verified on or accDupan9 all
tentative pan:el maps and any other information that the Planning Director
may de_~ necessary and reasonable.
Parcel Map identification number, Assessor's parcel number, title
map, and leg. el description of property but not including tract .n~"
Ha~e. and address of owner 'and'land divider and na~e and address of
person preparing map;
Approximate total acreage of property and lot size net and gr~ss for a
typic~-i lot and for each irregular 1-or, overall dimensions, north
arrow, scale and.~ata;
Land division boundary line and vicinity map showing r~l~ionship to
surrounding cu~auunt
Assessor's Map b~ok and page nu-nbers'of adjoining land divisions;
Naues, loc~tions, right-of-way, widths and improve=ents of existin!).
adjacent streets, alleys, railroads, and existing structures, b~th
above and below gr:und;
2~
10.
l!.
12.
14.
I,:.
!5.
17.
N~nes, lo,,cions, widths of ri0ht-of-way ,'or Proposed s:r~_ets, alleys
and easeaents, and the approximate grades of Propose= streets ant
approximate street centerl i ne radi
Streets and fight-of-way providing level access ta the prope~y;
If the private streets are proposed, it shall be so noted on the
tentative map,
N~oes af utility Nrveyars, location and width"af existing 'and
proposed known public utilil~ ease:en.ts:
a, When specific areas for s~bsurface sewige disposal systens are
required, the disposal areas, .This requirenent applies
Schedu1 e 'E' parcel maps .only,
Any known existing wells on the property or'within Z00 feet of
the suball vi si on boundary shaIl be i.ndi cared on the tentail ve map.
Water courses, channels, existing culverts and drain pipes, including
existing and proposed facilities for. control of storm waters;
Land subject to overflow, inundation or flood hazard;
Any land or right-of-way to be dedicated to public use-and
right-of-way for railroads and other'uses;
Identify c~non areas and open spaces;
Proposed lot lines and approximate dimensions;
Adjoining p~operty and lot lines;
Maxim~n contour intervals shall be four fe-.t, The contour lines shall
extend 300 feet beyond the exterior 1x~undaries of the property when
adjacent property is unimproved or vacant. Copies~of
topograohic maps are acceptable only when other information is not
available. Rood Control and Road Depar~ent base maps may be
acceptable; ..
Existing use and zoning of praper*~y immediately surrounding tentative
map;
!9. Listing zoning and pro. posed land use (single-family, multi-family,
bust ness i ndus:ri al );
Z0. A stat_-~ent as ta whether the' tentative map-includes the entire
contiguous ownership of the land divider ar only a portion thereof;
26
A list the na~es and addresses of . owners of real pr;~rty
located w~thin 300 'feet of the exterior boundaries of the pr=Der'.y
be Considered, as shown on the lest equalized assessnon, roll', and any
update issued by the Cpunty Assessor.
Repor, s and ~rtttsn stat~ents on the followtn.~) matters sh;~ll
ten,art ve map:
Proposed method of control of storm water, including data as to a~ount
of runoff, and the approximaiEe .~rade and dlmens+ons of th~ proposed'
fad 1 t ties. ,'
2. A ~n-itten st.ate~ent {Form..SA~ .;3) fnxa the Health Officer, siVaring the
type of sewage disposal ahd water supply that will be permitted shall
be suixnttted for all c~,,en:ial and industrial parcel maps.
C. If the 'land ~ision lies ~thin a special studies zone shown on th~ map
prepared by the State Geologist, pursuant to the Alqutst-Priolo Geologic
Hazard Zone Act,a !)eolo.aic report or waiver thereof pursuant to the
prov.isions of Ordinance No. 547 shall accompany all tentative maps.
D. Requests to waive the final map for any parcel map division shall be filed
at the time of the filing of the tentative parcel map.
A progra~ for the control of soil erosion in conformity with Section 14.1
et seo. of this ordinance shall be submitted for land developments in blow
s a"n ~ ;{re as.
SECTION 5.3. PLAHNED DEYP__OPMEI(TS- RESIDENTlAX., CO!~RCIAJ. A~D INDUSTI~IAL.
Whenever a tentative subdivision or parowel map is filed for a planned
residential, c,,~,ercial or industrial development, as defined in Ordin
No. 348, the following data shall ac:;npany or be delineated on the
t_=ntati ve map
in addition to the data required by Sections 5.! and ~.2 of this
or~,i nonce:
Locations and.dimensions of proposed dwellings, buildings or other
structures. ~
2_. Table indicating area and density calculations.
Building setbac~ dimensions.
Driveways, loading and par~ing areas.
Lots,ton and type of proposed'fencing, gates and walls.
Irrigation and landsca.ring plans, including p,_.~t species.
r"i oor pl arts and el evati one,
Locstton and dimensions of c:-~on areas.
proposal' for maintenac~ of comon areas-
10, proposed special res~'rictt°ns' -,
'yES'rING TENTATIVE MAPS, ' .-
SECTION 5,42 d ~n' ' nacted ' rsuant ~ Section .EB49B,1 ofo~~~!!.verrmenth
A, This se,tian is e F4 ~tsh proc'H"r~s necessary to-tmple:ent t ·
e
o rdt nancEs, pal i Ci e51, andnst~r~1th those County
to prates ~sc~bed in Sec~on 66474.2 of the
Goverment Code or, tf that Section ts ~pealed, ~th the County
ordinances, policies, and stin~r~'~ich are tn effect at the time ~he
vesting tentative map is app~ved or con~ttonallY approved. The ri;h~
conferred by this section shall expire If a final map ts not ~pproved prior
· to the expiration of' the ~sting tentative map- 'Whenever a prodsion
this ordinance requires ~at a tentative map ~ filed, a v~ttng tentative
map may ) filed instead-
S. ~henever a vesting tentitive map ts filed, it shall ~ processed tn the
s~e manner as a tentative map unl~s modified by this section, and shall
face the ~r~ "Vesting Tent~ve ~P-"
have printed conspicuously on i~ ·
All vestinQ tentative made shall ~ sumitted to ~e Planning Disctot on
the foms ~rovided by the plannina Depar~ent and shall ~ accmpanied by
t~e filing fee set forth tn SectiOn 17.! of this ordinance- In ad~tton
~0 the dat~ required by 5ectio~ 5.! ~nd 5.2 of this ordinance, the
fQilo~ng data and infomatlon may ~ required by t~e Planning Di~ctor:
:. A site plan, drawn to stile, that sho~ the follo~ng:
(a). N~ne, address
(b)
and the telephone nu-nber of the applicant and all
owners of the subjet'- property, including evi:ence:.that all
owners agree to the aPPliCation'..
Location or address of.the property. and Assessor's parcel nuaber-
Boundary and dimensions of property, north arrow, scale and date,
Topogra.uhY of the property- .
A:proximate total acr~a'oe of property and lot size of each lot',
recreational and open sBacs aria, and paving- C:=uon areas and
open space to be identified-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
EXHIBITS
R:~S~'TAFi:RIPT~2~331TM.CC 9~3;~3 Ir]b 'J C)
CITY OF TEMECULA
II
/'
I
./"
SITE
CASE NO.: Tentative Tract Map No. 25338, Amendment No, 1
EXHIBIT: A
P.C. DATE: August 2, 1993
VICINITY MAP
R:%S~,STAFFRPT~5338TM,PC 7122/93 Idb
'~iTY OF TEMECULA
..,,j'
DRAFT GENERAL PLAN - EXHIBIT B
DESIGNATION:
ZONING - EXHIBIT C
DESIGNATION: R-2 (MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLINGS)
CASE NO.: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 25338, AMENDMENT NO. 1
P.C. DATE: AUGUST 2, 1993
R:\S~STAFFRPT~25338TM.PC 7122/93 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
.I
..--
,..
CASE NO.: Tentative Tract Map No. 25338, Amendment No. 1
EXHIBIT: D
P.C. DATE: August 2, 1993
SITE PLAN
R:%S%STAFFRPT%25338TM.PC 7122/93 Idb
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
R:%S%STA~338TM.C'C2 9/21/93 ]rib
A'ITACHMENT NO. 3
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THIP~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF
TEMECUIA DENYING ~ APPEAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.
25338, AMENDIVrI~NT NO. 1, UPHOLDING PLANNING COMMISSION'S
DECISION TO DENY TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 2~338,
AlV~NDMY~NT NO. 1, TO SUBDIVH)E A 2.56 ACRE PARCEl. INTO A
28 UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPIV~NT KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NO. 921-330-0~0.
WHY~REAS, Leigh Waxmah and Dan Sterik fried Tentative Tract Map No. 25338,
Amendment No. 1 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and
Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted'by reference;
W!~REAS, said Tentative Tract Map application was not processed in the time and
manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing pertaining to said
Tract Map on August 2, 1993, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either
in support or opposition to said Tentative Tract Map;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission defied said
Tentative Tract Map;
WHEREAS, Leigh Waxman and Dan Sterik fried an Appeal of the Planning
Commission's decision to deny Tentative Tract Map No. 25338, Amendment No. 1 in
accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances,
which the City has adopted by reference;
WItEREAS, said Appeal application was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and local law;
WItEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertnining to said Appeal on
September 14, 1993, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support
or opposition to said Appeal;
W!tFJIE&S, said Appeal was continued at the September 14, 1993, City Council
meeting;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Appeal on
October 12, 1993, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support
or opposition to said Appeal;
R:~SXSTAFF~I:I~rM.CC'*2 9/21/9~ klb 5
WIIEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Staff Report regarding the Appeal.
NOW, TIW. RI~J~ORE, ~ CITY COUNCIl- OF ~ CITY OF TEME~A
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings.. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall
adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month
period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the
following requirements are met:
general plan.
The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the
2. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building penits, each of the following:
a. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action
proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which
will be studied within a reasonable time.
b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
c. The propose~l use or action complied with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area
Community Plan, (hereinafter, "SWAP") was adopted prior 'to the incorporation of .Temecula as
the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP'as its General Plan
guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General
Plan.
C. Pursuant to Section 7.1 of County Ordinance No. 460, any subdivision may be
denied if any of the following findings are made:
and specific plans.
That the proposed land division is.not consistent with applicable general
2. That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is not
consistent with applicable general and specific plans. .:
R:XS\STAFFRPT'a$338TM.CC2 9/21/93 lab 6
3. That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the
type of development.
4. That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the
proposed density of.the development.
5. That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements
axe likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish
or wildlife or their habitat.
6. That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements
are likely to cause serious public healffi problems.
7. That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements
will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of,
property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that
alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially
equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to
easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent
ju~sdiction~
D. The City Council, in denying proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 25338,
Amendment No. 1, makes the following f'mdings, to wit:
1. There is reasonable probability that Tentative Tract Map No. 25338,
Amendment No. 1 proposed will be consistent with the General Plan proposal being considered
or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. The draft General Plan Land Use
Designation for the site is Medium Density Residential (7-12 dwelling units per acre). The
project proposes a residentia_! density of 10.9 dwelling units/acre and is therefore is likely to be
consistent with the General Plan upon its adoption.
2. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with
the plan. The draft General Plan Land Use Designation for' the site is Medium Density
Residential. Land uses surrounding the site have been identified as residential, with medium
density residential designations to the east and west of the site, low-medium density residential
land uses to the north and high density residential uses to the south.
3. The proposed use or action does not comply with all other applicable
requirements of state hw and local ordinances. The project as proposed is inconsistent with
Sections 5.1 and 5.3 of Ordinance No. 460. In addition, submittal requirements have not been
met.
R:\S\STAFFRFrX25338TM.CC2 9/21193 klb 7
4. That the site of the proposed land division may not be physically suitable
for the type of development. The preliminary title report indicates that the property is impacted
by flooding, by a natural stream course, and has restricted access across the entire frontage of
Solana Way. No support documents have been received to provide additional information on
the easements and other constraints.
5. That the site of the proposed land division may not be physically suitable
for the proposed density of the development. The preliminary ti~e report indicates that the
property is impacted by flooding, by a natural stream course, and has restricted access across
the entire frontage of Solana Way. No support documents have been received to provide
additional information on the easements and other constraints, therefore, the site may not be
suitable for the proposed density.
6. That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements
may be likely to cause serious public health problems. The preliminary title report indicates that
the property is impacted by flooding. No support documents have been received to provide
additional information on this constraint, therefore, the site may be likely to cause'serious public
health problems.
R:\S\STAFFR!rI'~338TM.CC2 9/21/93 kib 8
Section 2. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTI~ this 12th day of October, 1993.
J. SAX, ,mr oz
MAYOR
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City .Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CAt-n~ORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, I-[I~I:IRy DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No.93- was duly introduced and placed upon the agenda of the City
Council of the City of Temecula on the 12th day of October, 1993, and that thereafter, said
Resolution was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the 14th'day of September, 1993, by the following roll call vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBER. S:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
JUNE S. GI~P-h"X
CITY CLERK
R:\S\STAF~338TM.CC2 9/21/93 klb 9
ITEM NO. 14
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPRO~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MAN~AGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
October 12, 1993
City of Temecula General Plan, Implementation Program, Environmental Impact
Report and Mitigation Monitoring Program.
PREPARED BY: John Meyer and David Hogan
RECOMMENDATION: It is requested that the City Council:
Open the public hearing and receive public testimony;
Review the Housing Element, remaining Clean-up Items, Environmental Impact
Report, Mitigation Monitoring Program and Statement of Overriding
Considerations, and direct staff to incorporate any changes into the final
General Plan; and,
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE
GENERAL PLAN AND ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA.
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE CITY
OF TEMECULA.
State Deadline for General Plan Adoption: November 25, 1993
R:\S\GENPLAN~,OP.CC9 10/4/93 Idb
Adopt a resolution 'entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE CITY 'OF TEMECULA.
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM FOR THE GENERAL PLAN FOR
THE CITY OF TEMECULA.
BACKGROUND
Over the past several months, the City Council has held seven public hearings on the Draft
City General Plan. To date, all the individual Elements have been reviewed by the Council.
At the October 12 meeting, it is anticipated that the City Council will review the balance of
the remaining clean-up items, the EIR, the Statement of overriding Considerations, the
Mitigation Monitoring Program, will Certify the EIR and approve the General Plan.
CLEAN-UP ITEMS AND REVISIONS ADDENDUM
The following section includes a number of minor aspects of the General Plan that require City
Council direction:
Circulation Bement
Nicolas Road Extension
At the last meeting the Council directed staff to determine the merits of keeping the Nicholas
Road extension on the Circulation Plan in a configuration that did not cross Santa Gertrudis
Creek.' As demonstrated by the Traffic Model, the Nicholas Road extension provides little
benefit reducing congestion along Winchester Road, regardless of its alignment. However,
there is a benefit in providing additional access to the future high school site.
If this is the justification for keeping the alignment on the Circulation Plan, staff and the traffic
consultant recommend that the alignment crosses the creek. Staff estimates that from a cost-
benefit perspective, the road segment would be more effective crossing the creek, providing
additional access to the future high school site. The added cost of the bridge is partially
offset by reduced land acquisition and road improvement costs because the link across the
creek would be shorter.
State Deadline for Generel Plan Adoption: November 25, 1993
R:~S\GENPLAN~GP.CC~ 1014/93 ]r, lb 2
Rural Road Standards
During the public hearing for the Circulation Element, a number of residents living in semi-rural
large lot areas of the City requested that the Council consider a rural road standard. In
response, the Council added language to the Community Design Element approving non-urban
roads in the City's rural areas. The Public Works Department staff is proposing that additional
language be added to the General Plan to ensure that the appropriate public works road
standard is used in these circumstances. Staff is recommending the Optional Rural Arterial
Highway cross section found in Figure 3-2 and that the following description be added to the
Roadway Function Design Guidelines:
10. Optional Rural Arterial Highway Standard
This optional interim roadway standard may be used in rural and semi-rural
areas with the following characteristics: (1) the adjacent parcels are used
primarily for residential purposes, (2) the lot sizes exceed 1/2 acre, (3) the
adjacent areas are primarily designated as either Hillside, Very Low, or Low
Density Residential in the General Plan, and (4) have general plan right-of-ways
which are less than 110 feet.
Features include:
A two lane cross section; however, in limited circumstances, left and
right turn lanes may be required at some intersections.
Sidewalk and bike lanes will be located along only one side of the
roadway to form a continuous system along each street, when needed.
Minimum intersection/access spacing along Rural Arterial Highways
should be approximately one-sixteenth of a mile (330 feet). Direct
access from private residential properties should be avoided where
possible.
· Retention of the full general plan right-of-way.
Should future traffic volumes on streets constructed to a Rural Arterial
Highway Standard reach Level-of-Service D, then the roadway should
be improved to full general plan standards."
Landscape Median Islands
To maintain consistency with the Community Design Element, staff is recommending that
medians within the City's major streets (110' or greater right-of-way) be installed with
landscaping. The cross-sections shown in figure 3-2, and accompanying descriptions on
pages 3-18 through 3-21 have been made to reflect this modification.
State Deadline for General Plan Adoption: November 25, 1993
R:~S~GI~'~IPLAN~GP.CC~ 10/4/93 ]LIb 3
Under normal circumstances, the landscaped median would be part of the off-site
improvements installed or paid for by the developer consistent with current City procedures.
For those streets already constructed the installation of medians landscaping would be the
responsibility of the City during some future capitol improvements project. The Temecula
Community Services District would maintain the landscaping in medians.
West Side Parkway
The Westside Parkway (Western Bypass Corridor) has been revised to an 88' right-of-way.
This right of way will b.e adequate to accommodate the proposed roadway.
Growth Management/Public Facilities Element
School Facility Policies
At the September 21 meeting, the Council heard extensive testimony regarding the School
Facilities language in the general plan. After an in-depth discussion, the Council directed staff
to meet with the School District and representatives from Kemper Community Development
one last time to work out language agreeable by all parties. A meeting was held at the school
district offices on Tuesday September 28. The City received revised language from both the
School District and Kemper. As a result, staff is recommending the following language:
GOAL 4
A quality school system that contains adequate facilities and funding to educate
the youth of Temecula.
Discussion
Adequate school facilities and funding are necessary to ensure that the high
quality of education is extended to future. residents of the City. Mitigating
impacts of development on the school system through the provision of school
sites, the imposition of statutory development fees and negotiated development
fees as permitted by law, as well as providing information to the School District
are the primary mechanisms to sustain quality educational services.
Policy
4.1
Coordinate with the Temecula Valley Unified School District, when
considering General Plan amendments, specific plans, zone changes or
other legislative land use policy decisions, to support the School District
in providing adequate school facilities for students for new development
to the extent permitted by law.
Policy 4.2
Promote and encourage the phasing of project development so that the
School District may plan, finance, and construct facilities intended to
serve the development.
Policy 4.3
Review proposed legislative land use decisions in the context of the
adequacy of present and future facilities as permitted by law.
Policy 4.4
Provide safe access for school children walking, bicycling, or driving to
and from school sites through coordination between the School District
and City Departments of Planning, Public Works and Engineering.
Stete Deadline for Generml Pier Adoption: November 25, 1993
R:\S'~GJ~NPLAN~GP. CC'9 1014193 klb 4
Policy 4.5
Pursue the establishment of a trade school, junior college, or four-year
college in Temecula which offers an emphasis in education required by
the engineering, biotechnical and biomedical industries located in
Temecula.
Policy 4.6
Plan for the joint use of school/municipal facilities wherever feasible and
desirable, including the joint use of school grounds, buildings, City
parks, multipurpose buildings and recreational facilities.
Implementation Program
C. School Facilities
Request the School District to provide the City with information concerning
potential impacts associated with proposed residential development. The
information should include a status report of the available school facilities to
serve proposed projects. To the extent that adequate school facilities are not
available on a timely- basis, the City will seek to assist the District and
developers in arriving at a solution to provide adequate school facilities, as
permitted by law.
Coordinate with developers and the School District to ensure that school sites
are adequately sized and located to meet increases in demand· Require
proposed projects with school sites to include a phasing plan that links project
development with the provision of a school facility when needed.
Since S.B. 1287 places substantial constraints on the City in this area, the City
will enter into a continuing dialogue among interested parties to create an
implementation program that is in compliance with state law and meets the
needs of the school District and the City's needs for adequate and affordable
housing and economic development. Should S.B. 1287 be repealed as a result
of rejection of Proposition 170 on the state-wide ballot November 2, 1993, the
City Council shall establish a school mitigation resolution which specifies the
procedures to be followed by the City, School District and developers in order
to determine school facilities impact associated with residential development,
available sources of funding for school facilities necessitated by such
development and the appropriate mitigation measures. The resolution would
provide for procedures consistent with those under County Resolution 93-131,
which apply to the County portion of the Temecula Valley Unified School
District, as permitted by law.
Community Design Element
Chaparral Opportunity Area
At its June 15, 1993 meeting, the City Council tentatively approved keeping the Chaparral ·
area as a special study area. However, the Council directed staff to continue to work at
developing criteria for the Chaparral Area in order to accommodate land planning for the
Chaparral area prior to the adoption of the General Plan.
State Deadline for General Plan Adoption: November 25, 1993
R:~S\GENPLAN~GP.CC9 10/4193 ~ 5
Staff has further studied the Chaparral Area and is recommending the following changes:
Remove the area south of Santiago Road from the Chaparral Area.
Remove the Chaparral Area from the Special Study Overlay.
Designate the Chaparral Area as Low Density.
Assign the L-1 Zoning District which will set a minimum lot size of I acre.
Include a section in the Community Design Element establishing criteria for
development for the Chaparral Area at densities up to 2 units per acre in certain
circumstances.
Staff believes the proposed changes to the Chaparral Area will address the various concerns
previously raised by the Council. The Low Density land use designation will allow for greater
use of the property; however, the criteria found in the Community Design Element (found in
the Revision Addendum) will provide for appropriate transition and protection of natural
resources. To assure a better transition from adjacent areas, lots adjacent to Santiago Road
shall have a'minimum lot size of 1.75 acres. A property owner would be able to develop half
acre lots upon showing justification through a zone change without having to apply for a
general plan amendment.
Revisions Addendum
Throughout the Public Hearing process, the City Council has been taking straw votes on the
individual elements. Along the way, Council has directed staff to make various corrections
to the text and exhibits within the Plan. Staff has made the requested modifications and
included them in a RevisionsAddendum attached to this report. The addendum consists of
all recommended changes to the General Plan Elements provided during the Public hearings
beforethe City Council. Only those pages of the Draft General Plan, where modifications are
recommended, are included in the Revisions Addendum.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Background
An environmental impact report is a document which is intended to describe and analyze
potentially significant environmental effects and discuss ways to mitigate or avoid these
effects. The legal requirements for the preparation and adoption of an environmental impact
report are contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as amended, and
further explained in the CEQA Guidelines prepared by the Governor's Office of Planning
Research.
Contents of an Environmental Impact Report
The purpose of an environmental impact report (EIR) is to provide information to decision
makers, responsible and affected agencies, and the public about what is likely to occur as a
result of the proposed project. To facilitate this goal, the California Environmental Quality Act
and Guidelines require that an environmental impact report provide the following information:
State Deadline for General Plan Adoption: November 25, 1993
R:\S\GENPLAN~GP.CC9 1014/~3 ]LIb 6
2.
3.
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13,
14,
A description of the project;
A description of the project's physical and environmental setting;
The significant environmental effects of the project;
The project's unavoidable significant environmental effects;
The mitigation measures or actions needed to reduce the effect of the project on the
environment;
The alternatives to the proposed project;
The relationship between short-term uses and long-term productivity;
The significant irreversible effects and changes which would result from the project;
The projectis growth inducing impacts;
The environmental effects which were found to not be significant;
The project's significant cumulative effects and,
The comment letters received on the draft EIR;
The responses to the comments received on the draft EIR; and,
A list of persons, organizations, and agencies consulted with or commenting upon the
draft EIR.
Process for Preparing and Certifying EIR's
In additions to the contents of an environmental impact report, State Law also contains
standards for the preparation, notification, review and comment, and certification (adoption)
processes. The standardized process for the certification of an EIR is as follows:
m
5.
6.
7.
8.
Notice of Preparation (of an EIR) to solicit public and agency issues and concerns and
determine the scope of the EIR;
Preparation of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR);
Notice of Completion(of an EIR) and the distribution of the DEIR for public review and
comment;
The response comments received on the DEIR;
Preparation of the Final EIR (FEIR);
Certification that the EIR was prepared in accordance with the provisions of CEQA;
Adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations; and,
Notice of Determination (that a decision has made using the FEIR).
Initial Environmental Study
The Initial Environmental Study (IES) was completed for the Draft General Plan and a Notice
of Preparation (NOP) was issued on April 15, 1992· The IES identified a number of potential
impacts associated with the following issue and resource areas:
· Geology and seismicity ·
· Air Quality ·
· Hydrology ·
· Biological resources ·
· Noise ·
· Land Use ·
· Agricultural resources ·
· Safety and the risk of upset ·
Population, housing and employment
Transportation and circulation
Public services and utilities
Aesthetics
Light and glare
Cultural resources
Parks, recreation and trails
Fiscal impacts
State Deadline for General Plan Adoption: November 25, 1993
R:\S~GENPI.A~GP.CC9 10/4193 IrJb 7
The City received a number of responses to the NOP from a number of federal, state, and
regional organizations and individuals on the scope and content of the proposed environmental
impact report and these comments and concerns were considered in the preparation of the
Draft EIR. The Initial Environmental Study is included in the Draft EIR Technical Appendices.
The Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) was completed in August, 1992. The DEIR
was sent to responsible and trustee agencies and previously identified interested parties. The
official public comment period for the DEIR was from August 14, 1992 to October 2, 1992.
During the. comment period, the City received 13 comment letters from 12 different agencies
or organizations. In addition, a letter was received after the comment period ended. This
letter was also considered in the ~preparation of the FEIR. The majority of the comments were
focused on the continued identification and preservation of biological resources. Air quality,
circulation, aesthetics, and agriculture were also discussed in the comment letters.
Significant Environmental Effects
The following table lists the identified environmental issues and the level of significance of the
impacts after mitigation.
: ENVIRONMENTAL i :IMPACTS' ;! ::i :~;: ~:i ~:' i:L~ELi: :OF :S:iGNII::ICANCE:: A~ER MITIGATION ~-
Geology and Seismic Hazards
Air Quality
Hydrology
Biology
Noise
Land Use/General Plan/Zoning
Agricultural
Risk of Upset
Population/Housing/Employment
Transportation/Circulation
Fire Service
Police Service
Hospital Service
Paramedic Service
Education
Library
Water
Mitigated to a level of insignificance
Significant
No significant impacts
Significant
Significant
Mitigated to a level of insignificance
Significant
Mitigated to a level of insignificance
No significant impacts
Significant
Mitigated to a level of insignificance
Mitigated to a level of insignificance
No significant impacts
No significant impacts
Significant
Significant
Mitigated to a level of insignificance
State Deadline for General Plan Adoption: November 25, 1993
R:~S~GENPI.,AN~GP.CC9 10/4193 kJb 8
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Sewer
Solid Waste
Electricity
Natural Gas
Aesthetics
Light and Glare
Cultural Resources
Parks/Recreation/Open Space
Fiscal Impacts
.LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE .A'.FTER MITIGATION
Mitigated to a level of insignificance
Mitigated to a level of
No significant impacts
No significant impacts
Mitigated to a level of
Mitigated to a level of
Mitigated to a level of
Mitigated to a level of
No significa.nt impacts
insignificance
insignificance
insignificance
insignificance
insignificance
Statement of Overridina Considerations ·
The Environmental Impact Report lists 26 environmental impacts, seven of which cannot be
mitigated to a level of insignificance. These are: air quality, biology, noise, agricultural,
transportation/circulation and library services. As a result, the City will need to adopt a
statement of overriding considerations.
State Law requires the City to balance the benefits of the General Plan against those
environmental impacts that cannot be mitigated to a level of insignificance. In order to make
a statement of overriding considerations the City must make written findings to support its
action. Attached for the Commission's consideration is a Statement of Facts and Findings and
Statement of Overriding Considerations. This attachment documents the impacts, considers
alternatives to the General Plan and makes findings supporting the Statement of Overriding
Considerations.
Mitiaation MonitorinQ Proqram
State law also requires the City to adopt a mitigation monitoring program to ensure
implementation of all mitigation measures included in the EIRo The Program describes the
roles, responsibilities and procedures in implementing the mitigation measures. The program
includes a matrix which highlights the mitigation measures, the key City department
responsible for overseeing that function, and the timing of each mitigation. The program is
subject to change up to the point it is formally adopted by the City Council. A Mitigation
Monitoring Program has also been attached for the Commission's consideration.
Planning Commission Hearings
During the January 4 and 24, 1993 Public Hearings, the Commission received limited
testimony on the EIR, Statement of Overriding Considerations and mitigation Monitoring
Program. The Commission made a few minor modifications to these documents. As a result
of the discussion on the School Facility Policies, The Planning Commission listed the Education
State Deadline for General Plan Adoption: November 25, 1993
R:\S\GENPL.AN~GP.CC9 10/4193 IrJ'o 9
Environmental Impact as a Significant Unavoidable Impact within the Statement of Overriding
Considerations.
CONCLUSION
The General Plan Consultants and Planning Department believe the Draft Element has been
adequately revised to respond to comments received by individuals, groups, and other
agencies and recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No(s) 93- , Certifying the
Final Environmental Impact Report, adopting the Mitigation Monitoring Program, adopting the
City of Temecula's first General Plan and adopting the Implementation Program as contained
in Attachment No(s) 4, 5, 6, and 7.
Attachments:
4.
5.
6.
Revisions Addendum - Page 11
Attorney Opinions and Related Correspondence Regarding School Facility Policies and
AB 1287 - Page 12
Resolution Certifying the EIR - Page 13
Resolution Adopting Mitigation Measure Program - Page 18
Resolution'Adopting General Plan - Page 22
Resolution Adopting General Plan Implementation Program - Page 26
State Deadline for General Plan Adoption: November 25, 1993
R:~S%OE/qPLAI~OP.CC9 10/4/93 Idb 10
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
REVISIONS ADDENDUM
R:~S\GENPLAN~GP.CC9 10/4/93 lrJb 11
REVISIONS ADDENDUM
CITY OF TE~CULA
INTRODUCTION
The Revisions Addendure con~-~ts of the recommended changes to the elements of the Draft
General Plan dazed February 16, 1993. The paZes included in the Revisions Addendure are only
those pages of the Draft General Plan where additions or deletions to lang-~e or mapping are
recommended. The additions are shown in boM/zd/cs and deletions are show with a su=,kc out.
The recommended chan~es are the result of input received during the Public Hearings, staff
review, and from written comments by State Department of Housing and CommuniW
Development.
CITY OF TEMECU'LA Land Use Element
Ill.
GOALS AND POLICIES
Goal I
A complete and integrated mix of residential, commercial, industrial,
recreational, r-:-~- public and open space land tts~s.
Discussion A well-balanced community provides a broad range of land uses that are planned
in desirable patterns and intensifies. By providing for a balanced mixtur~ of land
uses, the City cau achieve a suitable inventory of housing for a range of income
groups, a viable commercial] and employment base for residents and surrounding
mannunifies, ample open space and recreational opportunities, and adequate
public facilities and servict. s.
Policy 1.1 Review all 'proposed development pl,n~ for consistency with the
community goals, policies and implcmcntation programs of this Gencral
Plan.
Policy 1.2
Policy 1.3
Policy 1.4
Policy
Policy 1.6
Policy 1.7
Policy 1.8
Promote the use d innovative site planning techniques that contribute
towards the development of a variety of residential product styles and
designs including housing suitablc to thc comm,mlty's labor force.
Require the development of unified or clustered community-level and
neighborhood-level commercial c~nters and discourag~ development of
snip commercial uses.
Consider the impacts on surrounding land uses and infrastructure when
reviewing proposals for new dovelopment.
Support the development of light industrial, manUfamg, research and
development, and office uses to diversify Temecula's economic base..
Provide well defined zoning and development standards and procedures to
guide private sector plnnning and development.
Requir~ the preparation of specific plans as designated on the Land Use
Spedfie P/an On~zy to achieve 'the comprehensive pD-ning and
phasin8 of development and infr~~
Consider taking the lead on preparing specific pl,n-~ for areas designated
on the Land Use Plan that have multiple landowners.
Policy
PER CC
DIRECTION
Encourage plannod unit developments flexible zoning techniqm in
appropriate locations to prmcrve natural f~atures, achieve innovative Site
design, achieve a range of tmnsiaon ol denslats, provide open spac~ and
rear, ation facilities, and to provide necessary ameaxities and facilities.
Draft Da~ July 26, 1993
Page
PER CC
DIRECTION
General Plan Prod:ram {{ ~'-
RGLr[~ 2.4
F
--" ~,,._|-,
'~EMEC~
G~n~ral Pl~n rogr~m
CITY OF TEMECULA Land Use Element
Legend for Specific Plan Overlay
Figure 2-~ (Continued)
APPROVED SPECIFIC PLAN AREAS
A. Winchesmr M~sa
B. Rancho Spa and CounW Club
C. Warm Springs
D. Silverhawk
B. Mountain Vicw
F. Margarita V'ffiage
G. Rancho Highlands
H. Paloma d=l
I. Vail Ranch
J. R~dhawk
J.1. Roripaugh H'dls
FUTURE SPECIFIC PLAN AREAS~
W'mchester 1800
L Ouinta Do Lago
M. Murdcta Springs #1
N. Borel Airpark
O. Crown Valley Villagc
P. Hot Springs V'filage
Q. Johnson Ranch
P,. Roripaugh 800
T.
U.
V.
W.
X.
Y.
W'mchester Hills
W'mcheater Meadows Business Park
Temccula Rcgional Center
Campos Veaiea
Old Town
Unnamed Specific Plan
Unnamed Specific Plan
Z,,Z2,Zs- Unnamed Specific Plan
AA. Murdy Ranch
LOCATION
Area of Intcrest
At'ca of Interest
Arca of Interest
Sphere of Influence
Sphcrc of In~ucncc
.City of Tcmccula
City of Tcmccula
City of Temecula
Sphere of Influence
Sphere of Influence
CL'y ef T~rn~
LO~ON
Sphex~ of Ini=iucncc
Sphere of lneuencc
Sphere d lnfiuen~
Sphex~ of lnfiucnc~
Sph~x~ of lnSucncc
~ of hterest
Sphere of ln~uen~
Sphere of Influence/
City of Temecula
City of Temeaxla
CiW of Temecula
City of Temecula
City of Temecula
City of Temecula '
City of Tcmecula
City of Tcmecula
CiW of Teme, c~xla
CiW of Tcmccula
Tht nam~ of the Futm~ Sp~dfw Phm Art~ m =tig~t t~ chan~,
Draft Daw; July 26, 199t
2-t8
CITY OF TEi1/IECULA Land O~e Element
De
PER CC
DIRECTION
Special Study Overlay
The Special Study Overlay designation is intended for those areas in the community
that require a comprehensive, detailed evaluation of development opportunities and
consmzi~ The City of Temecula will lead the preparation of a special sately for
the Hicolas Valley area as shown on Figure 2.6. The land use designations
idenafied on the Land Use Plan are based on existing lot patterns, access
cott,rtraints, lack of infrastruaure, topography, and other considenz~ons. The
purpose of the special study is to recommend any changes to General Plan land uses
based on a detailed evaluation of the following:
the provision of flood control, sewer, water and other services;
impacts on surrounding development in terms of traffic, light, noise, and
other irnpacts~
m~hods to provide a trmt.ciaon between rural and suburban/urban
development;
topography and related visual impacts of development;
existing lot patterns;
tra. Ortc circulation and impacts on level of service;
vegetation and wildlife resources; and
the provision of recreation raas and open space linkages.
The special study(s) should also identify a strategy for financing and phasing of
infzu.vtruaure and other public improvements. Future development must be
consiaent with the adopted reconunendations of the special study. Should
development be proposed prior to completion of 'the study, the land use should be
consistent with the exisang General Plan designation.
If the Special Study include$ recornmendationz that necgsagitate an amendment to the
General Plan, the. cost of the amendment shall be home by the City of Temecula.
2ZU-OZlO2C, P4,VD.tI~ · July 2~, 1993
Par 2.42
The City of
'MECULA
General Plan Program
RGt.T[~
CITY OF ~CLrI.A Circulation Element
111. GOALS AND POLICIES
Goal 1
SWive to maintain a Level of Service "D" or bet~r at all intersections within
the City during peak hours and Level of SerVice "C" or better during non-
peak hours.
Discussion
Thc level of service concept is defined as a qualitative measure describing
opcrating conditions at an intersection or along a roadway scgmcnt. A lcvcl of
service definition genexally describes operating conditions in terms of faaors such
as speed, fre~om to mancuvcr, Wa~c interruptions, dclay, cam.fort and
convcnicncc, and safety. Lcvcl of Scrvicc "D" is typically considered tolerable
if limited to the p.e~k hour periods when tr~mc flows arc heaviest.
The stated lcvcl of scrvicc goal scrvcs as the foundation for providing a street
actwork that moves pcoplc and goods safely and cfficicntiy throughout the City
while ensuring that tra~c delays arc kcpt to a minimum.
Policy 1.1
Establish street standards and all new roadway facilities shall bc
constructed or upgraded to meet City standards where feasible.
Policy 1.2
Require an adequate evaluation of potential traffic impacts associated with
new development prior to project approval, and re, quire adequate mitigation
measur~ prior to, or concurrent with, project development.
Policy
PER CC
DIRECTION
Use the Circulation Element Roadway Plan to guide detailed planning and
implementation of the City's roadway system. Tks North Ca..aml
Kaa. ..oy Ro~l a..le..dsn IL.id..g .Viasl,~-P. oc_e to tke
Rood will not be
a.d L..prov~...e,.tc hen bee.. st~..Idetod:
lhr,terfidd Stage Reei ~vterzion' fi.o... Hi~way 79 $mrth to
~{,. . :tin Hot RF. :..gs
~..d Drive O~t
Ma.~=~t, R~ffa... 8ol-nn to Mv~an Hat Springs
~..ohea~ R~ ~ighi~? 79 North) nq~..i..g,to ~ Iv,.$~o...
Y..oz Rooe to
~=shtgor ~dg 15 ister~.~ L..p~..s.~I
Niashe RFt a~arly ~e.~ ~..~eger R~i to
Mv~etr Hat $pHngs R~d ~a ~o... inahaaar R~t to
B~tna~ai~ $t.ge Rs-~ a..d
Calh Cirasol to Calh Ch,pog to
S~nr.a a..d
Walaott L~ne (bot~veo.. .r .~
Ted-OX~m~P.~m. CtJL · July 26, 199'3 Ps~ 3-9
CITY OF TEtM~CLU-~ Circ;;_l~rion Element
PER CC
DIRECTION
In add:~on, Ci.ty ~aff shall zr~dy :hc L-~dcsigs~:tion of Migh~vay 79 .'~orth
frem a S:atc .Yig~m~sy :o a C.:~ Urban Arterial, and :he rodiras.~o~n of
y'a~a gsneratod ~,~'o... sqrts~do tkc CL7 :o a :oil road. Tho CJn~aI
Cipe:zlation PJzn shall be per.'odically st~rded at 5, 20, 25, and 20 year
buildout p~ :ods to av.'lHte the ..oed for :he .~orth Cc~eral X~arncy
Rozd a:tonsrion. If the .Vorth Cononl .~oat, noy R~e oxtonMon is :o
r~.~ain on tho CipouIaaon Plan, spooi~a stTt~ios mua bo undertaken and
pe~liealIy natiaed priep to tho LT. ple..~ataaon of tko ro~dwa~ inaIudin$
~,~ _~nvit, onmoT. tnl Z..pca Rapon tknt ~; in co...plinnao w~h thc :hon
.~teeJffod CEQA gfiiidir. sa fot, r. oiae b.t~ffo:~.ng :.'e p,blio safety,
Policy 1.4
Policy 1.5
Ptu-sue trip reduclion and tr~rt,~ponation systems management measures to
reduce and limit congestion at interset, ions and along streets within the
City.
periodieally Update ever? three years, or as needed, "build-out" traffic
forecasts to monitor the impact of development approvals and the
adequacy of the Circulation Element Roadway Plan.
Goal 2 Enlumce wa~ic safety on City street~
Discussion The safe operation of vehicular tnf-sc on City s=cets is a concern of both City
officials and residents of the community. The following policies am dir~ed
towards minimizing safety hazards and encouraging safer operating conditions on
City starts.
Policy 2.1 The City shall enforc= spc~ restrictions throughout the City.
Policy
Rexiuir~ that-future roads and improvements to existing macis be designc~i
to minimize waffic conflicts such as those which result from curb paricing
maneuvers and uncontrolled accc:ss along heavily traveled roadways.
PoUcy 2,.3
Re, quiz that the development of new private driveways do not introduc~
siLZnificant traffic confiicls along major streets and primary residential
collecton roads.
Policy 2.4
Require that vehicular and pedestrian traffic be s~parated to the maximum
er~nt feasible..
Poncy
Establish an ongoing maintenance program to ensur~ the safety of the
City's roadway syste=n.
T~4-ox~x~v-cmt.ctx. · July 26, ~
Pap 3-10
IV. CIRCULATION PLAN
The Circulation Plan developed for the City of Temecula has been desigted to meet the
following objectives:
To provide adequate capacity to accommodate the travel needs resulting from the
General Plan Land Use Element as well as fi'om anticipated development in adjacent
Rivexside County and City of Muftieta areas; and
· To maintain a positive quality of life in Temecula.
PER CC
'DIRECTION
The proposed Circulation PIn for the City of Tcme~ula Sphoro of Influonoe and ,~rea of
Int~r~t and Sphere/Aria of In.t~nce, and Environmental Study Area, is illustrated in
Figure 3-1. The alignments shown for futurt planned roadways art preliminary and are
subject to reftnement based on ftaurt enginem~ng aud/~. Figura 3 I depic~ the
rs:~ommended cfirvulation cy~em ~or a~oaz: outdo :ha CiW and Sphere and illustratec the
continuity and interaction of tho City's C. Armdation Plan with th~ surrounding circaflation
system. Figur~ illusm2ang tht planned' conantdty and inttraction of the 'City's
Circulation Plan w~th the satrounding circulaaon system art inchtded in the General
Plan EiR Appezu~x, Volume I17.
A. Principal Plan Features
While all components of the Cimulation Plan are important, some of the Plan features
are being highlighted in this section. These features have be~n ~lected based on one
or more factors:
· The facility serves as a primary tramc carrying medal within the City;
The facility represents a si~ific=nt change from the previous SWAP Circulation
Element; and/or
· The facility/corridor includes special design futures or sen, es a special function.
The principal features of the Circulation Plan include:
DesiSnation of Winchester Road, east of Jefferson Avenue, as an "acccas
restriaed" Urban A.neTial with special added casements reserved for future transit
or travel demand manaScmcnt use..
D~signation of State Rout= 79 (south), east of 1-15, as an "ac_~_ss restrictexi"
Urban Arterial to Butterfield Stage Road and an "access restricted" Arterial cast
of Butterfield Stage Road.
Designation of Butterfield Stage Road as an "acc_~__s restricted" Arterial north of
State Route 79 (south) except for the segment between Nicolas Road and Borel
Road which would bcan "access restricted" Urban Arterial. .
TEd-OX~OSOP-Cm,CLIL * July 26, 19~ Ps~ 3-15
TYPICAL
URRAN ~AI ~AY
~ A~A~ H~Y
~ H~
ROADWAY CROSS SErfIONS
·
SECONDARY
,, 79'- 101' ROW
· 14' 14' "
OPTIONAL RURAL ARTERIAL
* Sidewalk
:;aF To be used for curb pm'kjng, bike lmaotdin'mane
, ,, For intedm use in eemi-nard end lefge loe mwithin
theCJt. yinm, seeondmV, mmlm~"eb'wm/*.
General Plan Program
HGURE 3-2
CITY OF TEME~ Circulation Element
V. IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS
This section of the Circulation Element discusses a broad range of topics related to
trm'~.sportation improvement implementation strategies and programs which collectively work
towards the realization of the Circulation Element goals and objectives.
A. Roadway Functional Design Guidelines
The following functional design guidelines
classifications depicted on the Circulation. Plan.
sections for the Circulation Phn roadways.
are recommended for roadway
Figure 3-2 shows the typical cross-
1. Freeway
Interstate 15 fre~way design standards are dictated by Caltrans District 8. The
ultimate facility planned by Caltrans (as defined in the Route Concept Report for
Interstate 15) through the City of Temecula 'will add one High Occupancy
Vehicle (HOV) lane to the current four mixed flow lanes in each direction.
Interchange improvements identified in the Circulation Plan will need to be
coordinated and approved by Caltrans. It is likely that all interchanges on-ramps
along Interstate 15 within Temecula will be subject to peak period ramp metering
within the next ten years. The City should support the concurrent implementation
of HOV bypass lanes at the ramps (where possible) to promote ride sharing and
express transit usage by area commuters.
2.' Urban Arterial Highway
Features include:
A six to eight-lane high speed highway with raised landscaped median (use
for left turn movements) and striped shoulders.
Access'restriction may vary depending on whcre the facility is located '-
within the City and the degree to which the roadway serves through traffic.
Generally, one-quarter mile intersection spacing should be considered as a
minimum although one-third mile would be a desirable target. Where
overriding circumstances will not allow the desired intersection spacing
policy to be met, left turn restrictions should be considcred at all
-n-~ignalized intersections and "high-speed" design features should be
incorporated into the intersection design (e.g. curb radii and
accelcration/decelcration lanes where appropriate.
Urban Arterials designated as "access restricted" on the Circulation Plans
should maintain a minimum one-third mile spacing and a desirable target
spacing of one-half milc. Raised medians should be used On "access
restricted" Urban Artcrials.
TEM-OXMDGP<:IR, CUL ·Scptcmbcr 14, 1993
Pap 3-18
CITY OF TEMECULA Circulation Element
Curbside parking is generally not considered appropriate along a heavily
traveled facility of this type.
Riverside County design standards should be used as a basis for developing
City standards. State Route 79 is subject to Caltrans District 8 design
standards and policies. A segment of Ynez Road is classified as an Urban
Arterial primarily due to its' planned six-lane sex:lion. Right-of-way
constraints and existing development will not allow for the typical cross
section to be provided or desired access controls to be achieved.
Additional right-of-way/easement dedications should be considered at all key
intersections with other Urban Arterials, Arterials, and Major streets for the
accommodation of full width auxiliary turn lanes.
Traffic carrying capacities of 53,000 to 70,000+ vehicles ,per day (at Level
of Service D) can be achieved depending on the degree of access control
and peak period traffic loadings.
3. Arterial Highway
Features include:
A four-lane cross section with raised or painted landscaped median (used
for left-turn movements).
Desirable minimum spacing for major street intersections along an arterial
is approximately one quarter mile. Minor street and driveway access may
be allowed at shorter intervals but consideration should be given to left turn
restrictions at these locations.
Arterials designated as "access restricted" on the Circulation Plan should
maintain a minimum one-quarter mile spacing and a desirable target spacing
of one-third mile. Raised medians should be used an "access restricted"
artefials.
As a primary traffic carrier, curbside parking may not be considered
appropriate along the more heavily traveled Arterial segments within the
City.
Additional right-of-way/easement dedications should be considered at key
intersections with Urban Arterials, other Anefials, and Major streets for the
accommodation of full-width auxiliary turn lanes.
Traffic carrying capacities of 34,000 to 45,000+ vehicles per day (at Level
of Service D) can be achieved depending on the degree of access control
and peak period loadings. - -
TSI-OI~OSOP-C~ILCUL · September 14, 1993
Page 3-20
CITY OF TEMECULA Circulation Element
Riverside County design standards should be used as a basis for developing City
standards for Arterial roadways. A segment of State Route 79 (south) east of
Butterfield Stage Road would be subject to C, altrans design standards and
policies.
4. Major Highway
Futures include:
A four-lane cross section with painted or raised landscaped median (used
for left-turn movements).
Minimum spacing for principal street intersections along Major streets
should be one-eighth mile. The desirable target spacing would be one-
quarter mile between principal intersection. Where overriding circumstances
will not allow the minimum spacing policy to be maintained, left turn
restrictions should be considered at minor unsignalized driveways.
As a primary traffic carrier, curbside parking may not be appropriate alotlg
some of the more heavily traveled Major street segments within the City.
Additional right-of-way/easement dedications should be considered at key
intersections with Urban Arterials, Anerials, and other Major streets to allow
for fill-width auxiliary turn lanes or dual-left turn lanes.
Traffic carrying capacities of 34,000 to 36,000 vehicles per day (at Level of
Senrice D) can be achieved' depending on the degree of access control and
peak period loadings.
Riverside County design standards should be used as a basis for developing City
standards for Major roadways.
5. Secondary Highway
Features include:
· A four-lane cross section without median (undivided).
Minimum intersection spacing along Secondary streets should be
approximately one-sixteenth mile (330 feet). Direct access from private
residential properties should be avoided where possible.
While the Secondary street cross section allows for curbside parking, this
parking must be prohibited near principal intersections where left-turn lane
striping is provided.
TEM-0~P-ClR.CUL · September 14, 1993
Page 3-21
Urban Arterial
8 - lanes
Urban Aneda!
6 o Lanes
F'~;Artcrial
,1 - Lanes
Major
4-l.anu
principal Collector
2-l.anu
i. Spectfic Plan Road
Size Vanes
Transit Co~idor
[~"]lnlerchanle Improvement
CIRCULATION PLAN
/.#
, ..-
./ I
(,
~-:, \
The City of
TE~CULA
General Plan Program
/
i,/,,: ,_
FK URE
General Plan Program
CITY OF TEM~CULA Housing Element
V. CONSTRAINTS
A. Governmental Constraints
Governmental constraints are policies, standards or requircmenm imposed by the
various levels of government on development. Although federal and state agencies
play a role in the imposition of governmental constnints, these agencies arc beyond
the influence of local ~overnment and are therefore not addressed in this document.
The following factors conswain the maintenance, improvement, and/or development of
housing in Temecuia: land use controls; building codes; processing procedures; and
development fees.'
ZOnln_q Code
The General Plan is the foundation of all land use coneels in a jurisdiction. The
Land Use Element identifies the location, distribution and intensity of land uses
' in the City. The primary instruments for implementing the General Plan will bc
the Zoning Code and Subdivision Ordinance. ]"he current Zoning Code being
used by th~ Cay is the County of Rbers~'s Ordinance 348. The City is
currently preparing a Development Code which will be cortsi,rtent with its
General Plat~ For purposes of the Housing Element, an analysis of the DraJ~
Temzcula Development Code is provided. This analysis may be further refined
during the next Hou,ving Element update, when the Development Code will he
adopted. The carrent Subdbi~n Ordinance being used by the City is the
County of Riverside's Szt~n Ordinance 460. The City expects to conanue
to rely on the County's Code for at least the next fiscal year.
77te proposed Temecula Development Code incorporates resident~ standards
that will enable the conanued development of higher density projects as
consm~ed trader the Coanty's Zoning CotIt and Subdbi~n Ordinance.
proposed Development Code contains seven residential classiJ~cations, which
cover the six aenerd Plan Land Use designations. The latut use controls
permit by right single family residences in all zones except the Medium and
I~gh Density categories. Townhomes, mulafamily housing, and mobile homes
are permitted by right in the Low Medium, Medhtm, and High Density zones.
In addition,-the Code provides for a Village Canter Overlay and a Planned
Devdopment Overlay. The Development Code regulates sm:h features as
building height and density, lot area, st~baclcs, and open space requirements per
zoning di,~.'_,?_. The overlay zottes art a special designation which are subject
to site-sped. Fw regtdations.
Approval for development ~ the Village Center Overlay requires satis,faaion
of performance standards araculatd in the Development Code. These
standards reflea a focas on mzique and creative development that promotes
integration of retail, open space and resid~lal uses. Diver~y of housing,
including a.6'ordable housing is one faaor in the performance smrdards. The
Plannd Development Overlay also. ln'~id~s ~ in development
'rsa.oxxosor-xott.9;o · Janmy 4, 1993 Pa~ 4.-33
CITY OF TEtMECULA Housing Element
standards. Development standards for the seven residential zoning
classifications are provided in Table 4-29.
.. · Table 4-29
Draft Residtntial Develo,vment Standards
[Mb, mum Lot Arm ' iO atnsi 2.$ afftxii,Oacrst.$ turni T,2OO s.f.
ML-timum Avtntg~ Na Lot Arm~ ~ Dwmll~nl 10 antins 2.$ a~rmt 1~ att,~ .~ atn 7.~00 #~ ~900 $~ 12.400
Unit
Maxioutm Dwdllng Unitx P~' Atr~ .1 3 l.O ~'r~I 13 4.5 12 ~ 20
LOT D~tEN~ONX ,. ' " ~ "'
· . · FrontSetoac, Arm J lOOit. I I00itlTOit =50itl 5011 i 40it 130)~
iIMimmum Frorg Yard J 40it I ?.Sit ! 2~ it l 2S P,. ] 20it I 20;",. ! 20['.
IMinimum Corner Side Yard i 40 it l 1Nit 12N it I lN it ] lS it I lS it I 15it
Minimum lnteriar $ide Yane ] 201~ I ZO it ~ ] lO it
,~aTMI~I HEIGHT I S Sit i 3S it I ssitlssit[ 3s f~ I ~o it I so ~
'~tXrMVM ~ O? LOT covamo~ I I I I ass ~ ~s~ I 3o~
1.20oo l zsaol z2so l zoool 3oo l 200!z5o
Nocu:
l. Senior Citizen Homing v Congr~gaa Cart F_~_~tts''' pamittul up to 30 DUIAC in the H Diavi~ 18 DUIAC in the
M Diswict, and 12 DUIAC in the LM Dittri~
Y, Vatic~ble Sexbaticx:. In order to allow for a mare interesting visual image and more fie=ible ~e plantang variable
$ttbackx may be permitted in tht L-2, LM, M atut H dittric~ Front yard setbarJcs shall have aa average of at least
3. Var~k Si~ Ym,d S~bgr. l=: Vm~bk s~de Prd ~e'~--'ta' n"Y be ~ P
Sourc~.' T~ develoWuml mundar~ are basd on ~ Dr~ De~eloR:nent Code dated Mar~ Zg~ pr~amd by ~
plann~I Ctnmr.
Development standards may add to the cost of housing because the standards
may necessitate addiaonal construction and building materials and labor.
These standards are enacted for the protection of the community's healtl
safety and welfare.
Modification or flexibili~ in development standards can reduce the cost of
housing cotu=ucaon, which may in turn, result in lowar housing prices. In
Temecula's proposed Development Code, variable sethac~ standards are
allowed, which provides more flexibaity in site planning, particularly on
irregularly shaped parcels. In addition, residential development in both the
planned Development and Vdlage Center Overlay Zones can mice advantage of
even greater flexibility in development standards for these areas. It ~ expected
TEM-OIMMGP-HOU_qNO * Ja,nluuT 4, 1993
Ps~ ~-34
CITY OF TEM~CULA Housing Element
that development under these standards in :kcs~ z~oaa will promote a wider
range of housing opportunities in comparison to the traditional zoning districts.
The identification of affordable housing as a factor in the performance
standards for the Village..Center Overlay provides a mechanism for the
realization of this objective.
Parlcing requirements in the Draft Development Code call for two covered
spaces per single family residence with three or fewer bedroom, and three
covered spaces for a single family rta~dence with four or more bedroom.
Parking requirements for multifamily housing are generally two spaces per
unit, with an addiaonal requirement of one guest space per every four units.
Parking requirements for Senior Citizen housing and Congregate Care are
reduced to .5 spaces per unit and one space per five units for guest parking.
Temecula's draft standards are comparable to other ciaes in Riverside County
and are not identified as a constraint to development.
2. Subdivision Ordinance
State law requires local gover-ments to adopt a Subdivision Ordinance. The
Subdivision .Ordinance governs the p~ of converting raw land into
development sites.n State Law grants local gover-ments the authorities to
regulate the design and improvements of subdivisions and to impose dedication
and exactions on d~velopers. The Subdivision Map Act establishes statewide
uniformity in local subdivision procedures; standards for design and
improveanent~ axe left to local government discretion. As noted above, the
Subdividon Ordinance being used by the City is the County of Riversidt's
Subdivision Ordinance 460.
The Subdivision Ordinance like all land use controls, can be so restrictive-as to
increase cost of development and stifle development interest. The Subdivision
Ordinance used by the City b the stone or ~tnilar to the requirements imposed
by many other local governments in Riverside County, and therefore does not
pose any special cornmanes on the production of housing. Terncalla confnrms
m the procedural requirements established in the Subdivision Map Act and does
not impos~ additional requirements.
Building C, odm regulate the physical construaion of dwellings and include
plumbing, electrical and men-h=eical divisions. The purpose of the Building Code
and its enforcement is to protect the public fxom unsafe buildin~ and unsafe
conditions associated with construction. The City of Tcme, axla enforces the
Uniform Building Code as established by State Law. State affords local
government with SOme flexibility when adopting the unifnrm codes: the building
codes can be mended based on geographicaL, topological or climatological
CITY OF TEMEOJLA Housing Element
funds) ~
alfordabie/senkx
houUN.
ASSIST IN DEVELOPMENT OF AFFORDABt.~ HOUSING
Program dwNopment of
h~__Lemg for tow-
in=erie Nameholds
low-tundra
irtome homeheld$.
Sec~xm 202 ~eny
'Table 4-25
City of Temecula
Housing Plan S-mrn-ry
Plan Objective
(#u~wto=e FunWng
A~mteol $owce
mmodmememgienalf~r
sham demrmined at ~ 129
Veq, I.mv; -liif37 Ij:wer;
-li+/7/m;
Above Moderam income
andemm~mcyhmamgtn
,a ..... ,.J-' 'v,d k.~'
m Be~!um snd
RuMemil/Dens/ly zones,
she/tern/n ffm tenre/n/n9
Res/denl~ zones and
Commffc~ 8nd/ndmlrld
talk}eat r (V tder-T
Oevek;a~
mumfamay kite financing.
None necenay
Ad~taSeeMUnt0mbe Nomrmem*_,y
ammrto{mZmmm~m.
~a!lmmitMmndur~m
e:mlw~bypemomme'm
TEM-OXM)4GP-HOU,.~O · .]aal, tllry 4, Lq93
Respor~e
Agency
'I'11110
Frame
Planning Depalmsnt Tw~ Years
~ DNpamnm O~m year
Redwetopmmt
Tv~yeara
Ranrag Depmtnmt Ore year
Rmmmg ~m Oe ~ear
PI[~
CITY OF TEM~CULA Housing Element
A. Provision of Adequate Housing Sites
1. Land Use Element/Zoning Ordinance
The Land Use Element of the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance provide the
pl,nni-g and ~gulatory f:ramrvork necc~ary to achir,,c adequate housing sites.
The Land Use Plan provides for development of a range of housing, at varying
dcmsities. The densities range from .1 units per acn: for lands in areas designated
Hillside Residential, to 20 units per acre in the High Density cazgory.
The Zoning Ordinaxtc~ can provide rcgulatory incentives for the development of
affordable housing. The Density Bonus allows for additional intensity in
residential development which includes affordable housing. With regard to the
needs of the homeless, the ZOning Ordinance will allow for development of
emergency and wansifional shelters in specified axr, as.
Objective:
Adequate residential sites to accommodate the regional fair share
dczrmined at ~_.e9129 Very ~ 155137 Lower;, 15',/7/
Moderate; and ~,$433 Above Moderate income households.
2. Sites for l~-mergency and Tmn-~i~onal Shelters
The homeleas population refers to pez~ons lacking consistent and adequate shelter.
Homcless persons can be considered resident (those rem.ining in an al~a year-
round), or transient. Fanergcncy and wansitional shelters can help to address the
needs of the homeless. ~mergcncy shelters provide a short-term solution to
homclessncss and involve limited supplemental services. Tran-,~itional shcltcn,
in conwast, arc directed at removing the basis for homclcasness. Shelter is
provided for an extended period of time, and is combined with other social
services and counseling to assist in the lnnsition to self-sufficiency.
Objecnve=
Adopt a ZOning Ordinance 'which permits ttmn-~itional and
emergency housing in oommowial and industrial zones Me.~nm
and High Residential Density zones; and condiaonally permits
shelters in the remaining Residential zones and Commercial and
Indusrr/a/zones. These tme~ will bo subjeot to discretionary
approval.
3. Landbanking
Landbanking is the acquisition of land by public agencies in anticipation of future
dci~ciopmcnt. This technique serves as a hodgc aS~m speculation and inflation
as it secures land for affordable housing, until further resom~,s ar~ available for
their development. Where development of the land is not feasible, the local
agency can sell the land at markct rate, and capture the increase in value for such
public uses, e.g., senior/low-income housing.
Tnd-OnO~aP~OtX.SSO · hnum7 4, 1993
Open Space/Conservation Element
A number of additional improvements are currently underway or being planned.
These improvements include the c~nstruaion of a community recreation center,
pool complex and ..rnphitheater at the Sports Park, and other facilities at Pala
Park.
The City has a joint use agreement with the Temecula Valley Unified School
District which allows the City to utilize school facilities. School facilities arc
generally open to the public during non-school hours, weekends and vacations.
Due to the partial availability of school recreation facilities to the public at large,
such facilities arc considered adjuncts to the city-wide park system. Table 5-2
below pwvides a summary of the existing facilities at the school sites for use by
the public.
Table
Temecula Valley Un,~ed School District
Existing School Fadlities
Sparkman Blememary
Rancho Blem=nmry
Vail Blementary
Nicolas VaUey
Blemenmv/
Temecnala Blemenlary
T~necmta Miaal~
RId Hawk
Elt:~ntary
Fast of Wargatim Road,
norda of De Pottola Road
North of Ia Scx~a Way,
~west of Bnficld Lane
North of Ranthe Vista
Road at Mira Loma Drive
North of Nh:olas Road,
w~st of Jes~p.h Road
North of Ra~ho California,
west of Moraga Road
South of Pauba Rosa, west
of Bum=field Stage Road
North of Knamcy Road,
e.~ of Via Monterey
South of Ran~ho Vts-ta
Road, csst of Margaff,-
North of Wolf Valky, Wea
Playgrounds, Haudba/l, Baskcxba!l,
Volleyball
Socccrfictd, Playground& Baska:xball,
Volle.vball, Baseball. Handball
Playgrounds, Bask=tball, Softball,
Soccerfield, Baseball, Handball
Playgrounds, F~xibalL Basketball and
Playgrounds, HandbalL, Swi-~ni,~
Pool, pat. t~i[, Soccctfiela,
~ll~l~l, R'sf~kslt~ ~bal~ T~mi-~
Voll~yoal~ Handba~ Ba~ T~'~ei-~
Courts, Football, Bssketball, Softball,
Socccrficld
Basketball, Tennis Courm, Volleyball,
Soccsrficld, C, Tmnasi--,; Ba.scball,
Football
p/ayFounds, ~axketba//, Vo//ty/xza,
TeasedmE
Private recreation facilities arc found primarily in planned communities and
apartment complexes. These facilities usually include te--i-~ courts or a
basketball court. The existing facilities are so few that they have a minor impact
on meeting the demand for parks and recreation facilities within the community.
There are also several existing commercial zv~teation facilities within the City
and Sphcrc of Influcnes including four .golf comes. Two additional go. lf comes
T~t-OXXUmUP~PN,~^ · Dam: July'26, 1993
Pap 5-9
®eeeCI~ss [! and ~H
~icyc:¢ T~iis
..... _-~-, C~ss ~ B[cycl- Trai~s
,. ti
--' i
Ca~neus go J, age Skinner
Tra~ S,v~em
i
i
PER CC
DIRECTION
m
:;11 I
II
I
'2*EMECULA
General Plan roEram
~GUg.E 5-2
CITY OF TEME~ Open Space/Conservation Element
Historic and Cul. turally Si_maificant Resources including: ~ recorded
archaeological sites; 47 properties//seed on the Historic Resourc,'.s Inventory
prepared by Rivemide County; four listings on the California Inventory of
Historic Resources; and several historic resources of local importance including
the Butterfield Ove~and Stage l~,oute. The Temecula properties listed in the
Califumia Inventory of Historic Resources ax~ the Murrieta Creek Archaeological
Area, Temecula's fast Post Of;fic,~, Temecula Quarries, and the Little Temecula
Rancho Adobe. The archaeological sites include prehistoric sites, sites occupied
by Native Americans, and historical sites associated with the occupation of
Temecula Valley by ]~uropeans and l::uro-American-~:. Figur~ 5-6 and 5-'7
identify the sensitive archaeological and paleontological resourc~ of the Study
Area. Due to the presence of reliable water sources and a fertile valley floor, the
Temecula area has always been a desirable place to live. Tcmecula contains
many older structure, historic site~ and districts, and archaeological evidence
which may bc threatened with demolition or removal as urbanization continues.
10.
Nighttime sides within the Mt. Palomar ObsctVatory conscrvation areas. The City
is within close proximity to the Palomar Observatory which requires unique
nighttime lighting resu-ictions. Generally, Observatory sites need to be 30 to 40
miles from large lighted areas so that the nighttime sky wffi not bc brightened-
The Count}, of San DiegoCRy of Temectda has adopted an ordinance which
restricts nighnimc lighting for arus within a 15-mile radius and a 45-mile radius
of Palomar Observatory. Southeastern portions of the Study Area are within a
15-mile radius of the Observatory and should boare subject to .m-ingent lighting
controls and some l'matation of uses that may generate signifu:ant amounts of
//ght and g/are to preserve nighttime skies ('Figure 5-8).
The Open Space/Conservation Plan (Figure 5-9) identifies the undeveloped areas of the
Study Axed which, at a minimum, should remain as open space or cx~mcly low
density development for the consa'vation of resources, including water, wildlif'~, and
slopes. Policy guidance for the dedication of open space for public health and safety
is provided in the Public Safety Element.
D. Mineral Resources
State law requires the General Plan to address the need for conserving mineral
resources within the General Plan Study Area. The State Division of Mines and
Geology has prepared mineral resource reports desigrtating the mineral deposits of
statewide or regional signifwance, that are to be used to Mdreff mineral resources
within the ,$tu~ Area. The report effatled; .Mineral Land Classit~cation of the
Temescal Valley Area. Riverside Coterely California, Svecial Revort 165. evaluates
the mineral deposits of the Temecula Study Area. This report was prepared in
accordance with the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act ($MARA) of 1975.
The State Geologist has classified areas into Mineral Resource Zones (MRZ) and
Scientific Resource Zones (SZ). The zones identify the datewide or regiortal
Tevi-0XMiSGP4:)IaN.~^ · Dam: July 7.6, 1993 Page 5-2.1
CITY OF TEMECULA Open SpaceIConservation Element
significance of mineral deposits based on the economic value of the deposits and
acces. ribility. Within the City of Temecula, its Sphere of Influence, and the
Environmental Study Area, the zoning clas,rifi~n of MRZ-3a has been applied by
the State. 1'he blRT,-3 areas contain sedimentary depos~,v which have the potential
for supplying sand and gravel for concrete and crushed stone for aggregate,
however, these areas are determined as not containing deposits of significant
economic value based on the available data.
TEM-01X0SGP-OP~'A · Darg: July 26, 1993
Pags ~-22
The City of
'~'EMECULA
General Plan Program
FIGURB 5-8
CITY OF TElVlE~ Growth Management/Public Facilities Element
III. SUMMARY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND RELEVANT ISSUES
Facilities and services provided in Tcmecula may bc catcgorized as either 1) those under
the direa responsibility and authority of the City, either directly or through contract
arrang~ncnts; or 2) those under the responsibility. and authority of another unit of
government which are vitally important to the well being of the City and its citizens.
The facilities and services under direct City responsibility include:
Ftre protection (contracted to Rivaside County Fire Department)
Paramedic Emergency Services (contracted to Rivettide County Fire Department)
Police/She~ (contracted to Rivettide County Sheriff's Department)
Civic C~nter
Flood Control/Dralnag~ (local storm drain facilities)
Solid Waste (contract~i to private companies)
The facfiifies and services currently under other governmental r~sponsibility include:
PER CC
DIRECTION
Library CRivettide County)
Water Supply (Rancho California Water Distria)
Sanitary Sewer Facilities (Eastern Municipal Water District)
Schools (Temecula Valley Unified School District)
Flood Control (major facilities by Rivettide County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District)
Gas and EZectric Service
The dif~rences are si,,ovdi:icant in terms of the City's ability to control policies, programs
and .budget related to these functions. The City has direct conu'ol in the first category and
therefore exercises direa authority over level of servic~ standards. Where contract services
are provid~ct, such as fire and police proteaion, the City may address level of service
standards throu~ the contract
The City may only ird:lucnce decisions regarding the second category. Thus, the levels of
service may or may not be to the City's liking. in those cases, the option would be to find
ways of negotiating changes if the City desired different standards.
An additional consideration is the dcgr~ of control the City has ovcr placing conditions of
approval on proposed development projects regarding public services that axe impacled by
a project. Again; the City has the ability to impose conditions directly regarding thc first
category and only indh'ectiy in thc second.
A. Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Services
The Riverside County Fire Deparanent CRCFD), who operates in conjunaion with the
California Department of Foresu'y and Rre Proteaion (CDF), provides fi~ protection
services on a conWact basis to the City. The City conwact provides funding for 23.6
fire personnel. -
July
Ps~ 6-10
Existing Fir~ Stations
Proposed Fire -~tations
Shetiffs Demar:.m~nt/
County ]ustice Cents,'
Library.
Intorim OiLy Hall Site
French Valley Airport
i
PER cc
DIRECTION
'the City of ! ' '~.,]
EEMECULA !
General Plan Pro!~ram
Gas Line
Gas Line
|l
I$
|;
30" Gas Line
_TEMECULA
General Plan Program '.,/,,~/
115 K VOLT TRANSMISSION LINES
.J
J ? J
·
I I
I I
I I
I I ~
I
I
I
I
Existing or uncl~r construc,tion
1L~ K Volt Transmission Lin~
The City of
EMECULA
General Plan Program
CITY OF TExMECULA Growth Management/Public Facilities Element
C. Solid Waste Disposal
The City. presently contracts with two private firms for solid waste disposal. Both
haulers tra--~pon the City 's waste to the E1 Sobrante Land fill, located in unincorporated
Riverside County, south of Corona. The E1 Sobrante Land fill is a Class HI landfill
with a life expectancy through the year 2002. The landfill occupies 160 acres and
accepts an avenge of 900 tons per day. Western Waste Industries, the owner and
operator of the landfill, has indicated that expansion of the facility could increase the
life expectancy. Expansion plans are currently under preparation.
The City began implementation of its curbside recycling program in the fall of 1991.
The purpose of this program is to reduce solid waste disposal throu.~ r~cycling and
cornposting of wastes. Residents in the City separate rccyclable materials and garden
matcriais from their waSte. Recyclable materials arc transported to a center in Perris
for processing. Garde~ materials are haulcd to a scparate facility for compostLug, and
the remaining waste is hauled to the E1 Sobrante Land fill.
S,,f'scient landfill capacity to accommodate projected growth is an issue the City must
address. The City will adopt its Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SSRE) in
Fall, 1993, pumuant to Sta~ law. Implemcntation of the SSRE proZrams are necessary
to achieve the 25 pcrccnt diversion ~oal by 1995 and 50 .percent divasion goal by
2000.
D. Libraries
The City of Tcmccula is a member of the Riverside County Library District"' This
District maintains 25 library facilities throughout Riverside County, in both
unincorporated and incorporated arcas.
A 15,000 square 'foot library facility has reccntly opcned in the Walt Abraham
Administrativc Cent=, north of Winchester Road (Figure 6-1). The facility was
originally intended to serve residents in the southwest area of unincorporated Riverside
County. However, as a result of Tcmecula's incorporation, thc Tcmccula Library is
now located within City boundaries. Thc library will contain 50,000 volumes and is
anticipated to be adcquate to save thc current populations of the Cities of Murricta
and Tcmecula.
The issue of greatest impomncc to thc Library District is adequate funding to provide
for its adopted library service standards. Thc standards call for 1.2, volumes and .5
square fcct of library space per capita. Thc District currently pwvides only .13 square
fcct and .97 volumes per capita County-wide. Rcvenue for the Library District is
obtained from a Special District tax collected by the County. However, the District
compctes with othcr County agcncies for this funding, and therefore the lcvcl of
funding to the Couniy Library is unccnsin. Dcmand for libraries gocs hand in hand
with population increases. The library is often seen as a community symbol, a source
of community identification. Although the Tcmccuta Library is currently a.dcquate to
Tm~.ol~0ssx,-Gao. Mcrr· August 10, 199~J Pag~ 6-1,i
CITY OF TEMECUI~ Growth Management/Public Facilities Element
G. Educational Facilities
The Temecula Valley Uni~exl School District serves the CTcneral Plan Study Aru. The
Diswict maintains the full spectrum of educational facilities from day care to adult"
car~, Table 6-3 identifies the educational facilities in the General Plan Study Area,
with the curr~nt capacity and enrollment levels. of each facility.
Table 6-3
School Facilities
Name Location
li n.~,v c:~s~ c~'x'n~ · ..." ...~'...' ~ : .o~. ;~.. "'..".~; '.'. ;': """"
.. Rancho Day Car~. ! 3~530 La 5e,'w.z Way
[ Vail Day ~ 1 299~ .Mira Loma Dnv~
Enrollment
Current July ~
Capacity 1993
.. "...'....',. · .... ~.. ,,,,; :, .. .~... ]
'. .~7~ I -7474
I ~74 t ~4 74 I'.
$#aritmtm Day Cm ' 32225 Rio Pio Pico Road ~ 74 : 74
Ree' Hawk Day Cat-,; ,32PA5 Cax~no San Jose (rcmec,.ua) . 90 i $g 90
Ranc.~o ~lcm~nuu'y. ] 31530 La Sct~*na Way [ 0OG 930 I ~46 861
Joan F. Spazkman ~ 32225 Pio Pico Road i ~av2-1,203 5~2 888
Trmccula F..lcmcnm.W ~ 41951 Moraga Road % ~ 810 ~ 750
Vail Elementary J 2991~ Mira Loma Drive ~ 755 rs~ 692
Nicolas Valley Blemem~ }39600 N. General Kearne~ Cfcmecula) 6cg} 1,045 4~S 727
Red Hawk Elemematya t 32045 CAmino San Jose (Temecula) 6(~} 838 6tg 657
lTM~nec~ Middle ] ~ biargarim Road I 9.14 1J99 I gt4 1,046
Midme t42D75 Meadows Pm*kw, ay I 0~O 1,090 I Sla 1,009
Tcraccula Vatley 3L~55 Raacbo V'ura Road · -~,~2-n ~
2,$20 2,198
Rancho Vista 313~ Rancho V'.-qta Road 175 155 96 137
Tlae District recen~y completed an expansion phase: and as a result has sufficient
pertnanent facilities to meet current student populations through ttw use ofpsrtnanent
and latedin foallilies, As shown in Table 6-3, the capacity of school facilities is
gt'=ater than cun'ent student emollment figures, The District also maintains cuzrently
uses interim and relocatablc facilities to acd~omrnodats ntudent~ in oxoec~ of ~e
T!SM-0t~SGP-GRO.MGT · July 26, 1993
6-19
C~7'Y OF TEtNvXECULA Growth Management/Public Facilities Element
PER CC
DIRECTION
Quasi-public uses include churches; counseling centers; cultural facilities (theatres,
auditoriums, musc-m~, zoos, etc.); day care facilities; medical facilities; social scrvice
c~ntcrs; and similar public serving uses. Quasi-public uses arc fxcqucntly, though not
always, funded and operated by non-profit organizations. Such uses differ f:mm public
facilities and services in that they do not typically have legally prescribed standards
and not normally required as a condition of approval for private development projec:s.
It is common to accommodate q-n-,:i-public uses through a city's land use policies and
regulations, while prescribing special development standards. Such uses do not
generally have level of service standards. Qualitative standards arc pan of the
evaluation and negotiation process associated with each development project as it is
proposed. To the maximum extent possible, it is desirable to cluster quasi-public uses
in activity ccntexs, whcr~ the facilities can reinforce other activities (such as retail or
service businesses) and benefit from the availability of other sctwiccs (such as but
tr,--~porntion).
Gas and Electric Service
Southern California Edison supplies tleaticity to the Study Area via underground
and averhead lines. SCE's main snbst,,tion is located on Mira Loma Drive in the
City of Terauula. SeE is a public utility and therefore functions on demand.
Extensions for electrical service to new developments are governed by rules
established by the Public Utiliaes Commission of California- The hierarchy of
establishing electrical power lines from generation stations to customers is as
follows: transmission line; sub-transmission line; and service line. Figure 6-5
locates the exis~g transmission lines in the community which carry the main
electrical supply to smaller disaribution lines.
Natural gas is provided by the Sotahem California Gas Company (SCGC). Plastic
and steel underground lines are located throughout the Study Arttk A small number
of residents not serviced by SCGC tailize bottled propane or butant fuel. Existing
gas lines are shown on Figure 6-6.
*I"~2vi-O1%O6GP-(JI~XJ,MG'T · July 26, 1993
Pag~ 6-22
CITY OF TEI~IECULA Public Saf¢~ Element
locamd over the Study Area. Some existing development in the Study Area, is
potentially exposed to air traffic accidents.
G; Nuclear Hazards from San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station
The San Onofra Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) is located in C~rnp Pendleton
in San Diego County approximately 25 miles west of Temecula. Radioactive by-
products are contained within the' plant, with the exception of small quantities of
radioactive gas released into the air and liquids released into the Pacific Ocean. The
releases are monitored by SONGS personnel; and according to SONGS, radiation
exposure due to material releases is less than the typical exposure from natural
background radiation. The two most likely somx:es of radiation contamination are
transportation accidents involving transport of radioactive materials and uncontrolled
releases at the plant site-'
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has identified the area sin'rounding every
nuclear generating station as an Emergency Planning Zone CEPZ)- The State of
California has defined the area outside, and adjacent to the KPZ as a Public Education
Zone (PEZ). The Federal Government establishes the area with a 50-mile radius
around every nuclear generating station as an Ingestion Pathway Zone (IPZ). The
Tcmecula Study Area is located in the IPZ (Figure 7-5).
H. Emergency Preparedness
The City of Tcmecula has adopted a Multi-Hazard Functional Plan pumuant to the
California Emergency Services Act The primary objective of the plan is to ensure the
effective management of City personnel and resources in responding to emergency
situations 8t~mmlng fi'om natxlxal disastex~, technological incidents and nuclear defense
emergencies.
The plan includes a responsibility matrix which delineates specific responsibilities to
City departments or pemonnel in the event of an emergency. The plan also includes
a comprehensive hazard analysis that addresses the seven following areas: earthquake,
hazardous material incident; flooding; dam failure; major fire/wildfire; nuclear incident;
transportation incident.
The Mula-H~ Functional Phm provides a generd fluiddine on the ~va~uaaon
mutes in the vent of a disaster. Due to the unprzdi~ of the trnpaa of a
distLsrer on ~treets and highways, appropriate evacuation routes catmot be pre-
determined. In genffal, all traffic will be channeled to the nearby freeways, state
highways, and other major arterials. 1-25 will serve as the north-south evacaaaon
channel 1;Wmche, xter Road and Rancho California will be used for eaxt-wext
evacuation.
TSM-OXXOm~-~ · Daz: January 4, 1993
7-12
CITY OF TEME~ Public Safe,zy Element
Once the decision to evacuate is made, the public will be alerted and given
evacuation instructions by various means, including school aIertlmoniXor receivers,
AMIFM radio announcements, T~ announcements, sirens, mobile loud speakers,
hailers, and personal contact.
Movement information provided to the public will include the following:
· Routes to take, including conditions of roads, bridges, and freeway overpasses.
· What to do 0e a vehicle breaks down.
· The locations of assembly points for those without access to automobiles.
· Where to go for mass care until the emergency situation has passe&
're4-ozxoToP-Rm,v~ · Date.: January 4, 1993
Pag~ 7-14
CITY OF TEMECULA Community Design Element
C. Village Center Concepts
The Land Use Element describes the concept of the development of Village Centers
throughout the Temccula area. The intent of the Village Center Concept is'to' provide
opportunities for development of mixtures of commercial and residential uses that will
minimize vehicular circulation trips, avoid sprawling of commercial development, and
offer incentives for high quality urban design. While each of the Village Centers may
d~velop with different criteria, regulations, and visual themes, there arc c~rtain
common elements that should be addressed as a pan of each Village Center Plan. The
following illustrates these common considerations, or what could be described as the
"palette of design concepts" for a V'tllage Center area. Many of these design concepts
are also applicable to development proj~as otttside the V'dlage Centers. The
development of beneficial mixtures of uses, shared parIdng facil~ies, and pedesZrian-
oriented design, are examples of the concepts that should be encouraged throughout
the community.
1. Mixlatres of Uses
A Village Center is intended to include a diversity of different types of land uses.
While retail development may be the primary land use, it is envisioneel that the
Village Center will also include additional employment opportunities such as
officea, and personal scrvic~ shops. Community meeting eent~rs could be
included for private or public activities. Residential de. velopment could be
integrated with the non-residential uses- The mixtures of land uses could be in
separate structures or combined within a single bulldinS. One possibility is to
have retail use on the ground floor level, offiee uses on the second level, and
residential units on the upper levels.
Mbcture of uses
'T'EM-OX',.TOOP-CX)M.I~H · Draft DaIt: January 4, 1993
~ OF T'~M~~ Community Design Element
H. Chaparral Area
The ChaparraI Area is characterized by moderately sloped hillsides above dry
washbeds. F, zisang development consias of segmented lot patterns of varying sizes.
This area provides an opportunity to transition down from the larger lots found in
the Los Ranchitos and Santiago ~srntes areas to the south and west. Special
development considerations are necessary to assure development does not exceed the
carrying capacity of the area, while ~ providing appropriate transition of density.
The methods identified below should be refined and incorporated ~dthin the
Development Code and other regulations and ordinances.
1. Constraint Areas are recognized as having the following characteristics:
a. Areas with natural slopes of 25% or greater.
b. Areas within natural drainage course&
c. Areas with senslave biological resources as idenafied or referenced in the
General Plan or site specific study.
Encroachment of grading, construction or surface alteration aaiviaes
fineluding leach fields) shall not exceed 15% of the Constraint Area.
NoW~th~tmld~ng this guideline, said activities sludl be ~voided unless specific
miagatlons can be implemented to reduce potential impacts to a level of
'ti~-OZUO6P-COM.D~ · Dnu't Da~ August 10, 1993
Pag~ 10-28
CITY OF TEMECULA Communi,tv Design Element
2. Proposed building pads, d~veways and septic-leach field locations shall be
shown on the tentative map.
A written statvntnt (Form 8AN 53) from the Health Officer of Riverside
County Depar~ent of Environmental Health'shall be provided stating the type
of sewage disposal that will be permi~td for the proposed lots.
All drainage ureas Will remain nantral (nO undergrounding or placement in v-
ditches). Use of energy disslpators, retention basins or desilting basins, will be
permitted as deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works.
5. Joint access and driveways shall be required to the greatest extent possible to
reduce impacts.
Residences should be designed using alternative foundation techniques to
maintain the existing topography to the Fentea extent possible. Rather than
using extem'ive grading to create flat buading areas, stepped and pier and beam
foundations shall be encouragetL Retaining walls interior to the gwucture are
encouraged over stem walls along the exterior face of the structure.
7.
No graded slopes shall exceed a 2.'2 gradient. The maximum vertical height of
graded slopes over a 3.'2 gradient shall be 10 feet.
Where grading occurs, finished slopes should be contoured with land form
grading, rather than a formal engineered look.
Retaining walls shall be discouraged to the greatest extent possible, particularly
between a structure and the public view. Crib walls or similar structures, shall
be used in lieu of retaining walls when possible and planted with appropriate
shrubs and vines. Where retaining walls are used and visible from the public
view, the wall shall be colored block or color coated to match the natural earth
tone of the area or planted with appropriate vine;
10. To assure a better transiaon from adjacent ureas, lots adjacent to Santiago
Road shah have a minimum lot size of 1.75 acres.
11. Roadways and driveways shall be limited to a m-___,'ntum grade of 15%.
The Land Use Element designates the Chaparral Area as Low Residential, however,
much of the Chaparral Area is inappropriate for development of half. acre lots. The
Devdopmtnt Code will implement the Low Rbsidenaal designation through two
zoning districts. ?best districts will have different development standards, such as
half-acre and one-acre minimum lot sizes. Based upon the above policies, it can be
anticipated that much of the Chaparral Area will be zoned for the larger one-acre
lot sizes.
Draft Dat~: August 10, 1993
Page 10-29
CITY OF TF~IECULA Community Design Element
Neighborhood CompabiIity
Special attention has been given in the General Plan to the interface between rural
residential and urban development. However, the compatiFtlity between the
character of gxiaing single-family neighborhoods and adjacent proposed project~ is
also an important cortsideratlon within the community. Key considerations in the
planning and design of projects adjacent to existing single-family neighborhoods
includes the following:
Proposed land use den~'es sho*';-td provide a density tmns~n or buffer
to improve compatibil~ with adjacent neighborhoods;
Proposed projects should be designed in terms of height, architectural
style, bulk, location of parking, and vehicular and non-vehicular access,
to be compatible with surrounding neighborhoods; and
The design of commercial and o.O~ce projeas should allow for convenient
non-vehicular access by adjacent neighborhoods to the extent feasible.
Draft Date: Jatauary
Pa~ 10-2~
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
ATTORNEY OPINIONS AND RELATED CORRESPONDENCE
REGARDING SCHOOL FACILITY POLICIES AND AB 1287
R:\S\GENPLAI~0P.CC9 10/4/9~ klb i 2
SUITE I
(80S] 967-3468
LAW OFFICES
BURKE, 'WILLI-a~v~S 8c SORENSEN
SUITE: 640
171~) S4S-BSSg
October 4, 1993
J. Sal Munoz, Mayor
and City Councilmembers
CITY OF TEMECULA
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Re: General Plan - School Facilities
Dear Mayor Munoz and Councilmembers:
I have carefully reviewed the attached compromise
language regarding school facilities to be incorporated into the
Public Facilities element of the General Plan as well as the
General Plan Implementation Program. I fully support the
language that was developed over the past two weeks during
discussions between City and School District Staff and Kemper. I
recommend it for adoption as I believe it to be consistent with
the current state of the law, as well as anticipating the
possibility that the defeat of Proposition 170 will result in the
repeal of SB 1287 and the reduction of school impact fees.
1070999
Ga~r Thornhill
John Meyer
Sincerely,
Scott F. Field
City Attorney
CITY 'OF TEMECULA
Growd~ Management/Public Facilities Element
School Facility Policies
At the September 21 meeting, the Council heard extensive testimony regarding the School
Facilities language in the general plan. After an in-depth discussion, the Council directed staff
to meet with the School District and representatives from Kemper Community Development
one last time to work out language agreeable by all parties. A meeting was held at the school
district offices on Tuesday September 28. The City received revised language from both the
School District and Kemper. As a result, staff is recommending the following language:
GOAL 4
A quality school system that contains adequate facilities and fundingto educate
the youth of Temecula.
Discussion
Adequate school facilities and funding are necessary to ensure that the high
quality of education is extended to future residents of the City. Mitigating
impacts of development on the school system through the provision of school
sites, the imposition of statutory development fees and negotiated development
fees as permitted by law, as well as pro~/iding information to the School District
are the primary mechanisms to sustain quality educational services.
Policy
4.1
Coordinate with the Temecula Valley Unified School District, when
considering General Plan amendments, specific plans, zone changes or
other legislative land use policy decisions, to support the School District
in p~oviding adequate school facilities for students for new development
to the extent permitted by law.
Policy 4.2
Promote and encourage the phasing of project development so that the
School District may plan, finance, and construct facilities intended to
serve the development.
Policy 4.3
Review proposed legislative land use decisions in the context of the
adequacy of present and future facilities as permitted by law.
Policy 4.4
Provide safe access for school children walking, bicycling, or driving to
and from school sites through coordination between the School District
and City Departments of Planning, Public Works and Engineering.
State Deadline for General Plen Adoption: November 25, 1993
R:~S~GEZ,/PI..AN~GP.CC9 I0/5/B VJb 4
Policy 4.5
Pursue the establishment of a trade school, junior college, or four-year
college in Temecula which offers an emphasis in education required by
the engineering, biotechnical and biomedical industries located in
Temecula.
Policy 4.6
Plan for the joint use of school/municipal facilities wherever feasible and
desirable, including the joint use of school grounds, buildings, City
parks, multipurpose buildings and recreational facilities.
Implementation Program
C. School Facilities
Request the School District to provide the City with information concerning
potential impacts associated with proposed residential development. The
information should include a status report of the available school facilities to
serve proposed projects. To the extent that adequate school facilities are not
available on a timely basis, the City will seek to assist the District and
developers in arriving at a solution to provide adequate school facilities, as
permitted by law.
Coordinate with developers and the School District to ensure that school sites
are adequately sized and located to meet increases in demand. Require
proposed projects with school sites to include a phasing plan that links project
development with the provision of a school facility when needed.
Since S.B. 1287 places substantial constraints on the City in this area, the City
will enter into a continuing dialogue among interested parties to create an
implementation program that is in compliance with state law and meets the
needs of the school District and the City's needs for adequate and affordable
housing and economic development. Should S.B. 1287 be repealed as a result
of rejection of Proposition 170 on the state-wide ballot November 2, 1993, the
City Council shall establish a school mitigation resolution which specifies the
procedures to be followed by the City, School District and developers in order
to determine school facilities impact associated with residential development,
available sources of funding for school facilities necessitated by such
development and the appropriate mitigation measures· The resolution would
provide for procedures consistent with those under County Resolution 93-131,
which apply to the County portion of the Temecula Valley Unified School
District, as permitted by law.
State Deedline for Get~eral Plan Adoption: November 25, 1993
R:~S~GE~PLAN~OP.CC9 10/5~)3 klb 5
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE EIR
R:~S\GENPLAI~GP. CC9 10/4/93
ATTACHlViR-NT NO. 3
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF
TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT FOR THE GENERAL PLAN AND ADOPTING A STATEMloff
OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR ~ GENERAL PLAN FOR
THE CITY OF TEMECI~A.
WI~REAS, Section 65300 of the Government Code requires that cities adopt a
comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the jurisdiction as well
as any adjacent areas which, in the judgement of the city, bears a relationship to its planning;
and
Wi~REAS, Sections 65302 of the Government Code requires that a general plan
address the following issues: land use, circulation, housing, consexvation of natural resources,
open space, noise, and public safety; and
WI:fEREAS, Sections 65303 of the Government Code allows the City to include any
other issues or concerns into the general plan which may relate to the physical development of
the City; and
W!~,REAS, the process of preparing the General Plan has included a number of
opportunities for public and citizen involvement included a number of town meetings, technical
committee meeting and public hearings, and by making numerous copies of the plan and
asseclated documents available to the public; and
WItEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as mended (Sections
21000 through 21177 of the Public Resources Code), requires that prior to the approval of any
project the Lead Agency consider the potential impacts and effects of said project, consider
alternatives to the project, and identify mitigation measures necessary to reduce or eliminate the
impact of the project on the environment; and
WI~REAS, the City of Temecula prepared an Initial Study for the General Plan and
determined that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) would be required for the General Plan
in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines prepared by the Office
of Planning and Research; and
WHEREA~, the City of Temecula issued a Notice of Preparation on May 12, 1992; and
Wn~R~kS, the a number of comments were received concerning the scope and content:
of the EIR for the General Plan which were used to guide the preparation of the Draft EIR; and
WHY~REAS, the City of Temecula issued a Notice of Completion for the Draft EIR on
August 12, 1992; and
R:\S~GF.I~PLAI~OP. CC9 10/4/93 klb 14
WHEREAS, the Draft h'ffR was available for public review and comment from August
14 through September 27, 1992; and
~EAS, the City received a number of letters with comments and concerns about
the content of the Draft ~ for the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the State Clearinghouse notified the City on October 2, 1992, that the'Draft
EIR had been circulated in accordance with the provisions of CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the Draft BR for the General Plan identified a number of significant
impacts relating to aesthetics, agricultural resources, air quality, biology, cultural resources,
education, fife services, geology and seismic hazards, land use, library, light and glare, noise,
open space, parks and recreation, police services, risk of upset, sewage treatment, solid waste,
transportation and circuhtion, and water resources; and
Wn~REAS, the EIR determined that a number of significant impacts could be mitigated
and reduced to a level of insignificance for the foliowing: aesthetics, cultural resources, fire
services, geology and seismic hazards, land use, library, light and glare, open space, parks and
recreation, police services, risk of upset, sewage treatment, solid waste, and water resources;
and
WItEREAS, the EIR determined that, even with the application of available mitigation
measures, the following could not be mitigated to a level of insignificance: air quality,
agricultural resources, biology, education, library, noise, and transportation and circulation; and
WHEREAS, the Planing Commission has held duly noticed public hearings on October
19th, November 2nd, November 23rd and December 7th, 1992, and January 4th, 1993 to
consider the proposed General Plan and Environmental Impact Report; and
WHEREAS, on January 4, 1993, the Planing Commission recommended to the City
Council that the Council cenif-y the Environmental Impact Report and approve and adopt the
draft General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City provided a copy of the Response to Comments to all responsible
agencies on September 9, 1993 as provide in State law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held duly noticed public hearings on February 16th,
March 16th, April 6th, April 20th, May 18th, June 15th, August 17th, September 21st, and
October 12th, 1993 to consider the proposed General Plan and Environmental Impact Report and
Statement of Overriding Considerations.
R:IS'~GEI~IPLA!~GP.CC9 10/4/9'3 klb 1 ,,~
NOW, T!:I~REI~)RE, ~ CITY COUNCIL FOR THY~ CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DETERMINE AS FOIJ~OWS:
Section 1. The City Council has reviewed the Environmental Impact Report prepared
for the City General Plan, has considered the information contained within it, and hereby
certifies that the Report has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental'Quality Act, as amended.
Section 2. The City Council finds that to the extent that any impacts attributed to the
General Plan remain unmitigated, such impacts are acceptable in light of the overriding social,
economic and other considerations which will result from implementing the City General Plan.
As a result, the Council finds that the benefits of the General Plan outweigh the unmitigated
impacts which may result and hereby adopts a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the
following environmental impacts: agricultural resources, air quality, biologic resources,
education, library services, noise, transportation and circulation.
R:\SXGF...NPLAN~GP.CC9 10/4/93 klb 'J 6
Section 3. The City Clerk shah certify the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSI~X}, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of October, 1993.
ATTEST:
J. SAL mr roz
MAYOR
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 12th day of October,
1993 by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
.CO~CILMEMBERS:
CO~CH.MEIVIBERS:
CO~CK,MEMBERS:
JUNE S. GI~-PK
CITY CLERK
R:XS\GENPLAbS. GP.CC9 10/4/93 klb '] 7
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
R:~S~GEm'LAN~OX'.CC9 10/4~3 kb 18
ATrACHM~NT NO. 4
RESOLUTION NO. 93--
A RESOLUTION OF TH'E CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOFrlNG ~ MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
FOR ~ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT I~EPORT FOR ~ GENERAL
PLAN FOR ~ CITY OF TEMECULA.
Wlnr. RI~.&S, Section 65300 of the Government Code requires that cities adopt a
comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the jurisdiction as well
as any adjacent areas which, in the judgement of the city, bears a relationship to its planning;
and
WI:~.REAS, Sections 65302 of the Government Code requires that a general plan
address the following issues: land use, circulation, housing, conservation of natural resources,
open space, noise, and public safety; and
W!~,RI~AS, Sections 65303 of the Government Code allows the City to include any
other issues or concerns into the general plan which may relate to the physical development: of
the City; and
Wi~REAS, the process of preparing the General Plan has included a number of
opportunities for public and citizen involvement included a number of town meetings, technical
commiRee meeting and public hearings, and by making numerous copies of the plan and
associated documents available to the public; and
WHEREAS, the California Enviromental Quality Act (CEQA), as amended (Sections
21000 through 21177 of the Public Resources Code), requires that prior to the approval of any
project the Lead Agency consider the potential impacts and effects of said project, consider
alternatives to the project, and identify mitigation measures necessary to reduce or eliminate the
impact of the project on the environment; and
WI:rEREAS, the City of Temecuh prepared an Initial Study for the General Plan and
determined that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) would be required for the General Plan
in accordance with the pwvisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines prepared by the Office
of Planning and Research; and
W!~REAS, the City of Temecuh issued a Notice of Preparation on May 12, 1992; and
WI-IE~, the a number of comments were received concerning the scope and content
of the EIR for the General Plan which were used to guide the preparation of the Draft EIR; and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecuh issued a Notice of Completion for the Draft EIR on
August 12, 1992; and
R:~S\GBNPLAN~.GP.CC9 101419J kib '19
W!~.REAS, the Draft EIR was available for public review and comment from August
14 through September 27, 1992; and
WHE~, the State Clearinghouse notified the City on October 2, 1992, that the Draft
~TR had been circulated in accordance with the provisions of CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the City received a number of letters with comments and concerns about
the content of the Draft EIR for the General Plan; and
WHli:REAS, the Draft EIR for the General Plan identified a number of significant
impacts rehting to aesthetics, agricultural resources, air quality, biology, cultural resources,
education, Fife services,' geology and seismic hazards, land use, library, light and glare, noise,
open space, parks and recreation, police services,. risk of upset, sewage treatment, solid waste,
transportation and circulation, and water resources; and
WI~-RI~.&S, the Draft EIR identified a number of miU'gation measures which reduced
these significant impacts to a level of insignificance for the following: aesthetics, cultural
resources, Fife services, geology and seismic hazards, land use, library, light and glare, open
space, parks and recreation, police services, risk of upset, sewage treatment, solid waste, and
water resources; and
· WHI~REAS, the following impacts, even with the application of available mitigation
measures, can not be mitigated to a level of insignificance: air quality, agricultural resources,
biology, education, library, noise, and transportation and circulation; and
WHEREAS, the Planing Commission has held duly noticed public hearings on October
19th, November 2nd, November 23rd and December 7th, 1992, and January 4th, 1993 to
consider the proposed General Plan and Environmental Impact Report; 'and
WHEREAS, on January 4, 1993, the Planing Commission recommended to the City
Council that the Council certify the Environmental Impact Report and approve and adopt the
draft General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City provided a copy of the Response to Comments to all responsible
agencies on September 9, 1993 as provide in State law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held duly noticed public hearings on February 16th,
March 16th, April 6th, April 20th, May 18th, June 15th, August 17th, September 21st, and
October 12th, 1993 to consider the proposexl General Plan'and. Environmental Impact Report and
Statement of Overriding Considerations; and
WI~~, the City Council Certified the EIR and adopted a Statement of Overriding
Consideration on October 12, 1993.
R:\S\CIENPLAI~GP. CC9 10/4/9:t klb 2(::)
NOW, T[tEREFORE, ~ CITY COUNCIL FOR T!:!F, CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES I:i~,RI~,RY RESOLVE AND DETER,MINE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program, as
mended, and directs Staff to implement the measures identified in the Program as needed to
mitigate and reduce the environmental impacts associated with and resulting from the City
General Plan.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of October, 1993.
ATT~T:
SAt, mr oz
MAYOR
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CAIX!:~ORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECUIA)
I HI~RERy CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 12th day of October,
1993 by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCRAMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
C OUNCILMEMBERS:
JUNE S. Gl~h"h"tK:
CITY CLERK
R:\S~GENPLAI~GP.CC9 !0/4/~3 klb 21
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE GENERAL PLAN
R:~S\G]~IPLAN~OP. CC9 10/4/93 klb 22
-- ATTACttMENT NO. 5
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL FOR T!:ff- CITY OF
TEMECUIA ADOPTING ~ GENERAL PLAN FOR ~ CITY OF
TEMECULA.
WHEREAS, Section 65300 of the Government Code requires that cities adopt a
comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the jurisdiction as well
as any adjacent areas which, in the judgement of the city, bears a relationship to its planning;
and
WHEREAS, Sections 65302 of ,the Government Code requires that a general plan
address the following issues: land use, circulation, housing, conservation of natural resources,
open space, noise, and public safety,
WHEREAS, Sections 65303 of the Government Code allows the City to include any
other issues or concerns into the general plan which may relate to the physical development of
the City; and
WHEREAS, the process of preparing the General Plan has included a number of
opportunities for public and citizen involvement included a number of town meetings, technical
committee meeting and public hearings, and by making numerous copies of the plan and
associated documents available to the public; and
WHEREAS, Section 65360 of the Government Code requires that aH new Cities to adopt
a General Plan within 30 months of incorporation; and
WItY, REAS, the City of Temecula was incorporated on December 1, 1989; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Planning and Research, in accordance with the provision
of Section 65361 of the Government Code, has extended the deadline for adoption of the General
Plan from May 1, 1992, to November 25, 1993; and
WHF, REAS; the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as mended (Sections
21000 through 21177 of the Public Resources Code), requires that prior to the approval of any
project the Lead Agency consider the potential impacts and effects of said project, consider
alternatives to the project, and identify mitigation measures necessary to reduce or eliminate the
impact of the project on the environment; and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula has prepared an Enviromental Impact Report for the
General Plan in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines prepared
by the Office of Planning and Research; and
R:XS\GENPLAN~0P.CC9 10/4/93 klb 2~
WHEREAS, Section 65302 of the Government Cede requires that the City of Temecula
submit a copy of its draft Safety Element to the Division of Mines and Geology (DMG) for their
review and comment; and
Wltl~EAS, the City of Temecula submitted its draft Public Safety Element to the DMG
on August 26, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecuh has made changes to the draft Public Safety Element
in response to the concerns raised by DMG; and
W!t~,REAS, Section 65585 of the Government Cede requires that the City of Temecula
submit a copy of its draft Housing Element to the California Department of Housing and
Community Development for their review and comment; and
W!tF~RE&S, the City of Temecula submitted its draft Housing Element to the California
Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) on May 18, 1992, January 20,
1993, and August 3, 1993; and
WltEREAS, the City of Temecula has made changes to the draft Housing Element in
response to the concerns raised by HCD; and
W!tY~, the Planing Commission has held duly noticed public hearings on October
19th, November 2nd, November 23rd and December 7th, 1992, and January 4th, 1993 to
consider the proposed General Plan and Environmental Impact Report; and
WHEREAS, on January 4, 1993, the Planing Commission recommended to the City
Council that the Council approve and adopt the draft General Plan; and
WI-IF~REAS, the City Council has held duly noticed public hearings on February 16th,
March 16th, April 6th, April 20th, May 18th, June 15th, August 17th, September 21st, and
October 12th, 1993 to consider the proposed General Plan and Environmental Impact Report;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council Certified the mR, adopted a Statement of Overriding
Consideration and Mitigation Monitoring Program for the ~ for the General Plan on October'
12, 1993.
NOW, T!:!F~REFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL FOR ~ CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES I-IEREBY RESOLVE AND DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council hereby approves and adopts the General Plan for the City
of Temecula, as mended.
Section 2. The City Council hereby determines that until the new zoning ordinance
for the City of Temecula is brought into conformance with the General Plan, development
decisions shall be based upon the General Plan land use designations and policies, told not the
R:~S\GEIqPLAN~GP.CC'9 10/4/93 klb 24
existing zoning when these two documents are in conflict, in accordance with the consistency
requirements of State Law.
Section 3. The City Council hereby directs Staff to submit a copy of the fmal General
Plan to the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission for their review and comment on
airport related issues in accordance with the provisions of Section 21676 of the Public Utilities
Code.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVE/) AND ADOPTED this 12th day of October, 1993.
ATTEST:
J. SAL mr oz
MAYOR
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CAI. XFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I HEREBY CERT~Y that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
· Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 12th day of October,
1993 by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCH, MEMBERS:
COUNCK,MEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMB~:
~S. GI~-h-':K:
CITY CLERK
R:\S\GF.h'PLA~OP.CCS xo/4/~ kJb 25
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM FOR THE GENERAL PLAN
R:\S\GENPI..AN~GP. CC~ 10/4/9a Idb 26
ATrACHMI~-NT NO. 6
RESOLUTION NO, 93-
A RF.~OLU~ON OF THY~ CITY COUNCIL FOR TFIY, CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING THY~ ~ATION PROGRAM FOR
THT, GENERAL PLAN FOR THY, CITY OF TEMECULA,
Wm~'-AS, Section 65300 of'the Government Code requires that cities adopt a
comprehensive, long-ten general plan for the physical development of the jurisdiction as well
as any adjacent areas which, in the judgement of the city, bears a relationship to its planning;
and
W!~REAS, Sections 65302 of the Government Code requires that a general plan
address the following issues: land use, circulation, housing, conservation of natural resources,
open space, noise, and public safety; and
WHEREAS, Sections 65303 of the Government Code allows the City to include any
other issues or concerns into the general plan which may relate to the physical development of
the City; and
WHEREAS, the process of preparing the General Plan has included a number of
opportunities for public and citizen involvement included a number of town meetings, technical
committee meeting and public hearings, and by making numerous copies of the plan and
associated documents avniis_ble to the public; and
WHY~REAS, Section 65360 of the Government Code requires that all new Cities to adopt
a General Plan within 30 months of incorporation; and
WI~-REAS, the City of .Temecula was incorporated on December 1, 1989; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Planning and Research, in accordance with the provision
of Section 65361 of the Government Code, has extended the deadline for adoption of the General
Plan from May 1, 1992, to November 25, 1993; and
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as amended (Sections
21000 through 21177 of the Public Resources Code), requires that prior to the approval of any
project the l.~d Agency consider the potential impacts and effects of said project, consider
alternatives to the project, and identify mitigation measures necessary to reduce or eliminate the
impact of the project on the environment; and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula has prepared an Environmental Impact Report for the
General Plan in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines prepared
by the Office of Planning and Research; and
R:\S%GEhrPLAI~OP.CC9 10/4/~3 klb 2'7
WI~-REAS, the Planing Commission has held duly noticed public hearings on October
19th, November 2nd, November 23rd and December ?th, 1992, and January 4th, 1993 to
consider the proposed General Plan and Environmental Impact Report; and
W~EREAS, on January 4, 1993, the Platting Commission recommended to the City
Council that the Council approve and adopt the draft General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held duly noticed public hearings on February 16th,
March 16th, April 6th, April 20th, May 18th, June 15th, August l?th, September 21st, and
October 12th, 1993 to consider the proposed General Plan and Environmental Impact Report;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council Certified the EIR, adopted a Statement of Overriding
Consideration and Mitigation Monitoring Program for the RIR for the General Plan on October
12, 1993; and
WH'EREAS, on October 12, 1993, the City Council approved and adopted the draft
General Plan, as amended.
NOW, TFw-REFORE, ~ CITY COUNCIL FOR ~ CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES H'EREBY RESOLVE AND DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council hereby approves the Implementation Program to
implement the General Plan, as amended, for the City of Temecula and hereby directs staff to
begin to implement the implementation measures and actions identified in the Plan.
R:\S\GENPLA~GP. CC9 10/4;93
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSe. n, APPROVED AND ADOPT~.n this 12th day of October, 1993.
ATY~T:
J. SAL Mu oz
MAYOR
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALwORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEM]ECIIA)
I ltl;'~REBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 12th day of October,
1993 by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES:
ABSENT:
CO~C~ERS:
CO~C~ERS:
CO~CIIAVIBMBBR$:
JUNE S. GI~RK
CITY CLERK
R:Lq\GENPLAN~OP.CC9 10/4/93 klb 29
ITEM NO.
15
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER ~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
David F. Dixon, City Manager
October 12, 1993
Film Council
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize a $5,000 loan to the Temecula Valley Film Council and
instruct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary lending documents.
BACKGROUND: Attached you will find · letter dated September 27, 1993 which is a
request from the Temecula Valley Film Council to advance them ~5,000. The advance is to
assist in the cost of production of Temecula's first-ever "Community Variety Show". The
attached letter explains the need for the funds to be provided forth with and I have approved
an amount n~t to exceed $2,500. as an advance to the City Council's action.
DFD:jsg
R:~eede. N6FetCe~.me I
V · L L g Y
s pt. 27,
TEMECULA
VALLEY
FILM
COUNCIL
Mr. David Dixon
City Manager
City of Temecula
43 174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
d' ·
Dear Mr. Dixon:
Per your request, following is information regarding the "Community Variety Show" and
our proposal for the City ofTemecula W fund the above-mentioned show's post
production, on-air and marketing expenses.
Last Sept. 19, 1993, the Ternecula Valley Film Council, with the help of Hollywood -
based CoConun Communications International, finally succeeded at taping four (4) pilot
episodes of Temecula's first-ever "Community Variety Show". The pre-prodUction and
production of these initial episodes cost a lirde over $5,000. The money was raised by the
Film Council through a combination of existing F'fim Council fixntis, private money
donations, volunteer labor and local business sponsorships. In order for these four shows
to be broadcast on the air however, they need to go into post-production and an additional
$5,000 is needed to pay for editing, on-air and marketing expenses. The Film Council is
expecting revenue from advertisers who have expressed interest in sponsoring the shows,
but at the moment, without post-production editing, we do not have a complete product
to offer. The Film Council financial situation is pretty pathetic. We have to date, a total
of $800.00 in the bank account. It is because of our limited funds situation that we
propose the following:
A. The City of Temecula advance us the much needed $5,000.
B. The Ffim Council will repay the City of Temecula the $5,000 on an agreed upon
payment schedule when the F, Im Council is able to secure adequate fimcls from its
marketing efforts for the Community Variety Show.
(909) 676-5090 · Fax: (909) 694-0201 · After Hours: (909)' ;699-6167
Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce · 27450 Ynez'Road, Suite 104 , Temecula, CA
92591
Mr. Dixon
Sept. 19, 1993
Page 2
Why should the City of Temecula consider this proposal? It should, because the end
result of what the Film Council has produced in creating the Community Variety Show for
the dty and surrounding areas is going to benefit everyone. The city in the long run is the
major beneficiary of thi~ project. The Community Variety Show is a creative, original and
a great marketing and public relations vehicle for the city and surrounding' areas. The City
has allotted hundreds of thousands of dollars to market Temecula- What the Film Council
is proposing is not a budget breaking amount. ~.~, .
There is nothing like the Community Variety Show on the air at the present time. At least
none that we are aware of in which three show genres are combined in a full hour (quiz,
talk and entertainment). The Film Council might have just created its own original
programming style. Other communities might try to produce something like it but they
most likely will not have the broadcast quality the Community Variety Show has. The
show was created and produced by network- cah~er industry professionals, who were
challenged by the ambitious and aggressive Film Council project that they agreed to do the
shows for way below what they would normally charge network style productions.' Initial
public response and press reviews from people who were at the taping of these pilot
episodes have been very positive. ALready the Film Council has been besieged by calls
inquiring as to when they can expect to see the shows on the air.
Quality post production work is critical. Projected air date is mid-October. To meet this.
air date, editing has to be done no later than O~tober 8, 1993. From the edited materials,
the Film Council will do a pwmo tape and have a Preview function inviting an'rent
sponsors and potential sponsors to preview a protoo tape of the show and have an idea of
what the shows are going to look like.
I enclosed the Community Variety Show concept, script of the first show, pwduction cast
staff and current sponsor list and two newspaper articles about the project.
Thank you for your consideration and I look fonsard to hearing from you as soon as
possible.
Sincerely,
ITEM 16
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER/~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
City Manager
October 12, 1993
Old Town Temecula Merchants Association Request for, Funding
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider · request from the Old Town
Temecula Merchants Association to fund $24,000.00 to cover advertising on billboard which
promotes Old Town.
BACKGROUND: At the meeting of September 28, 1993, the City Council was approached
by members from the Old Town Temecula Merchants Association requesting funding in the
amount of $24,000 to extend a billboard message, which advertises the Old Town area, for
twelve (12) months.
The area identified as Old Town Temecula contains a diverse mix of businesses that include
retail shops, restaurants, a Western bar and dancing establishment, professional offices, a
museum and other service oriented businesses. The Old Town area generates approximately
$48,000.00 in sales tax per year. These numbers are derived from the audit reports of our
sales tax done by Hinderliter, deLlamas and Associates. Attached you will find a copy of a
letter presented to the Council on September 28, 1993 during the public comments portion
of the meeting. Pursuant to the provisions of the Brown Act, the Council could not act upon
this matter at that meeting, therefore it is appearing on your agenda for action this date.
DFD:jsg
,
R:'~gende.q)t~OTTMA.hn 1
The merchants of Old Town are still in tile recover stages of tile flood
of January 16, 1993. To counteract the effects of this devastating disaster
and the subsequent economic stagnation due to the negative image of Old
Town portrayed by news media, the Old Town Temecula Merchants
Association acted quickly to combal the loss of bt~siness and income in Old
Town.
The Board acted quickly on several fronts, first it stagod;a flood
~victim's benefit auction, held on February 20, 1993. Money.s collected
went to the individual businesses, and it was a source of much needed
.immediate cash to the business who sold merchandise. Proceeds received
from the Rod Run, held late Feb., helped to fund additional ad campaigns
to try to stimulate business. The association expended half the cost of the
centeffold two page ad on Old Town in the Chambers Visitors guide
currently in rack service in the amount of $3,8.50.00
- ~
Among many promotional activities, OT'FMA formed a billboard
committee and raised $14,000.00 to !ease. a freeway sign for six months to
promote Old Town. About 90% of the merchants in Old Town
participated, and others such as Lou Cashmere, owner of Texaco Service
Station and Wells Fargo Bank helped substantially. ..
It is widely felt that in Old Town this billboard contributed to the
financial recovery now being experienced by our local merchants.
The billboard lease will expire shortly. The Old Town Merchants dug
deep into their pockets to pay for the first six months rental; they are
financially unable to pull more money from their pocket an additional
time.
According to City records, $25,000,000.00 per year is generated from
retail sales in Old Town. Not to mention other commerce in Temecula
stimulated by people coming to Old Town. The tax contribution to our
city from sales in Old Town is approximately $250,000.00 annually.
· . According to Cal-Trans, our sign is subject to being viewed by 60,000
people per day. There is one major problem with it in that it is not
illuminated at night. OMG has agreed to light the sign after dark
providing OTFMA signs a contract for an additional year.;
This sign leases for $2,000.00 per month. ~'~ ~L,~ ~-
At this time we request a grant from the City of Temecula for
$24,000.00 to extend our lease for an additional twelve months.
Sincerely,
Old Town Merchants Association
~ r,,9-.
'\
· !
ITEM
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council
David F. Dixon
CITY OF TEMECULA
A GENDA REPORT
October 12, 1993
Auto Mall Marquee Funding
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council consider a loan to the ,Auto Dealers
Association of Temecula to erect an auto mall marquee and instruct staff to prepare
appropriate documents.
STAFF REPORT:
After lengthy negotiations over the past several weeks, staff is recommending that
the City Council consider a loan to the Auto Dealers Association of Temecula in the
amount of e280,000. The loan will carry an interest rate of 4.5% which is the
current interest the City receives on investments. The term of the loan is for seven
years with an additional three year option.
The Auto Dealers Association will receive credit toward repayment of the loan for
increased sales tax. Fiscal Year 1992-1993 will be used as the .base year. Sales tax
from auto sales during the base year was approximately e824,000. The amount paid
back and/or credited will be $46,705 per year. It is understood that each dealer's'
obligation could be reduced if additional dealerships are established in the city. I{the
number of dealerships decreases, the City will add the amount Of the loan payments
to the end of the loan period. It is also understood that the Auto Dealers Association
will provide a reasonable amount of time on the marquee for public service messages.
Staff is supportive of this agreement as it will remedy the potentia. I of an increasing
number of 45 foot auto dealer signs along Interstate 15.
FISCAL IMPA C T:
The loan will be funded by the Redevelopment Agency. The term of the loan is seven
years at a rate of 4,5%.
'CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS ITEM #17
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY:
APPROVAT.
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
David F. Dixon, City Manager
October 12, 1993
Item No. 17, Consideration of Auto Mall Marque. Funding
City Clerk June S. Greek
BACKGROUND: The staff will finalize a staff report on this item and forward
it to you under separate cover.
JSG
COMMUNI'TY SERVICES
DISTRICT
ITEM
NO.
1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 1993
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was held on Tuesday,
September 14, 1993, 8:10 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street,
Temecula, California. The meeting was called to order by' President Patricia H. Birdsall.
PRESENT: 4 DIRECTORS: Mur~oz, Parks, Stone, Birdsall
ABSENTi I DIRECTORS: Roberts
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney F. Scott Field, City Clerk June
S. Greek and Recording Secretary Gail Zigler.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Mur~oz to approve Consent Calendar
Items No. I and 2.
The motion 'was carried as follows:
AYES: 4
NOES: O
ABSENT: I
DIRECTORS: Mur~oz, Parks, Stone, Birdsall
DIRECTORS: None
DIRECTORS: Roberts
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of the meeting of August 10, 1993.
1.2 Approve the minutes of the meeting of August 24, 1993.
CSDMIN09114193
-1-
9/19/93
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MINUTES
2. Southern California Edison Comoanv
Community Recreation Center - Phase II
Easement
SEPTEMBER 14, 1993
for Project No. PW 92-29B -
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Approve the dedication of an easement to Southern California Edison Company
located at the Community Recreation Center and authorize the President to sign
the easement document;
2.2 Direct the City Clerk to execute and record the easement.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
3. Namin{i of Community Recreation Center
Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson presented the staff report.
The following representatives from the CRC Foundation asked for the Directors
approval of their recommendation that the Community Recreation Center be named
after Thomas H. Langley, President of the CRC Foundation:
Leigh Engdahl, 42005 Kafferboom Court, Temecula
John Hunneman, 28715 Via Montezuma, Temecula
Linda Campbell, 28750 Vallejo Avenue, Temecula
Bob Crowther, CRC Foundation
Melody Brunsting, 26745 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 104A, Tamecula
Tim Daniels, CRC Foundation
Kelly Donoho, CRC Foundation
Their recommendation to the Directors is based on the time and effort Mr. Langley has
put forth in raising funds for a community recreation center for the City of Tamecula.
Director Parks said he agrees with all the comments made regarding Mr. Langley and
the effort he has put forth to raise funds for the CRC however, Director Parks said he
has a level of discomfort naming a facility after a living person. Director Muftoz said
he shares these same concerns.
Director Stone suggested that a portion of the CRC building be named in honor of Mr.
Langley's efforts. Director Stone said he would like to see the amphitheater named
after Mr. Langley.
President Birdsall said she would support naming a portion of the facility after Mr.
Langley and suggested the gymnasium because it is more youth oriented and concern.
for the City's youth has been Mr. Langley's purpose in building the CRC.
CSDMIN09/14193 -2- 9119/93
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 14. 1993
Leigh Engdahl asked the Directors to consider letting the community name the CRC
building.
It was moved by President Birdsall, seconded by 'Director Stone to approve the Official
name to be the Temecula Community Recreation Center and directed that the
gymnasium be named the Thomas H. Langley Gymnasium. Further it was directed that
if the CRC Foundation wishes to discuss a public opinion poll or has a preference for
naming another portion of the center after Mr. Langley, staff is to pursue those matters
and report back to the Council.
The motion was carried as follows:
AYES:
4 DIRECTORS: Mu~oz, Parks, Stone, Birdsall
NOES:
O DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: I DIRECTORS: Roberts
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT - Dixon
None
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson advised the Council that 'Saturday, September
25, 1993, at 12:00 Noon, there will be a Grand Opening Ceremony for the Old Town
Temecula Senior Center.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
None
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Mur~oz to adjourn at 8:55 P.M. The
motion was unanimously carried.
CSDMIN09114193 -3- ' ' 911 9/93
COMMUNITY SERVICFS DISTRICT MINUTES SEPTEMBER 14, 1993
The next regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District will be held on
Tuesday, September 28, 1993, 8:00 PM, at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol
Street, Temecule, California.
President Patricia H. Birdsall
ATTEST:
City Clerk June S. Greek
CSDMIN09114193 ,4. ~11
ITEM
NO.
2
APPROVAL ~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DAVID F. DIXON
OCTOBER 12, 1993
TCSD MAINTENANCE OF COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPE
PREPARED BY: ~ {)[t( Bruce A. Hartley, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMM~-NDATION: That the Board of Directors:
Receive and file report concerning maintenance of commercial landscape areas within the City
of Temecula.
DISCUSSION: Community Services Department staff has investigated the
feasibility of including landscape maintenance of commercial properties in the TCSD. At this
time only one commercial development, Crystal Ridge Business Park, is being considered. -
The Crystal Ridge Business Park Association currently manages and maintains the landscape
maintenance of common areas. Ten (10) acres of developed slopes and parkways are being
maintained at a cost of $3000 per month. The water and electrical costs are approximately
$1,666 per month, depending on the seasonal water use. Of the thirteen parcels available, three
are currently improved.
For the TCSD to maintain this particular area, the estimated costs for the five acres of landscape
Landscape maintenance contract
Utilities (water & electricity)
City Administration Fee (13 parcels @ $20)
Repairs (30% of contract)
$36,000
20,000
260
10,800
Total $67,060
Cost Per Parcel (based on 13 parcels)
$5,158
The above estimate does not include any costs associated with making necessary impwvements
or flood damage repairs to meet TCSD standards. The additional cost for the inspection of
commercial properties has not been included in these estimates. The number of commercial
areas included in the TCSD would dictate the additional staff time required to inspect the work.
of contractors. These costs would be shared by the commercial developments being assessed
for maintenance.
Due to the additional cost associated with processing commercial landscaping applications,
inspecting construction plans, inspecting installation of slope areas, and monitoring on-going
compliance of maintenance standards, it is recommended that the Community Services
Department continue to process residential projects for TCSD dedications and allow the
commercial property owners to maintain their own slope and parkway areas.
FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact of adding commercial landscape to the TCSD
would be off-set by the assessment of those property owners receiving the benefit. Additional
staff would be necessary to inspect the work of contractors. This cost would also be funded
through the assessment.
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM
NO.
1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 1993
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order on
Tuesday, September 14, 1993, 8:55 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol
Street, Temecula, California. The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Ronald J. Parks.
PRESENT: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz,. Stone,
Parks
ABSENT: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Roberrs
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney F: Scott Field, City Clerk June
S. Greek and Recording Secretary Gail Ziglero
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
AGENCY BUSINESS
Minutes
1.1
1.2
Approve the minutes of August 10, 1993;
Approve the minutes of August 24, 1993.
It was moved by Agency Member Birdsall, seconded by Agency Member Stone. The
motion was unanimously carried·
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
City Manager David Dixon advised that the City has not received any information regarding
the City's bid to purchase the Rancho West Apartments from the RTC.
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
None
RDAMIN09114193 -1- ' ' '09119/93
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 14, 1993
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmber adjourn at 8:55 P.M. The
motion was unanimously carried.
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula'Redevelopment Agency will be held on
Thursday, September 28, 1993, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street,
Temecula, California.
Chairperson Ronald J. Parks
ATTEST:
City Clerk June S. Greek
RDAMIN09/14193 -2- 09/19193
ITEM
NO.
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY {_.~,~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Agency Members/Executive Director
Scott F. Field, General Counsel
October 5, 1993
Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Development of Old Town
Temecula Into a Major Destination Entertainment Facility
RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency approve and authorize the Chairperson to
execute a "Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Development of Old Town Temecula
Into a Major Destination Entertainment Facility".
DISCUSSION: Zev Buffman has approached the City and Agency regarding entering
into a private/public partnership that would lead to the development of Old Town
Temecula into a major destination entertainment facility with a Western theme. The
project would include converting Old Town into a pedestrian mall with adjacent parking
and adequate traffic circulation, and the acquisition of land for the development and
construction of entertainment venue(s) for music, dance, theme entertainment and
electronic attractions such cabaret theaters, a tented "'Wild West" show, a "Showboat"
and avenue for food and wine shows.
Mr. Buffman has considerable experience with similar entertainment projects. He
has developed an entertainment amphitheater in Phoenix, and most recently, caused the
development of, and now manages the Glen Helen Amphitheater in San Bernardino.
The M.O.U. would lead to the adoption of a formal, private/public partnership
agreement for the development, construction and operation of the Project. The formal
agreement would provide that the City/Redevelopment Agency would initially pay for
construction of the Project, and that Buffman will make payments to the City/Agency of
(a) amounts equal to City/Agency debt service on the bonds issued to cover the cost of
Buffman's elements of the Project; (b) specified percentage payments of gross proceeds
from operation of the Project; and (c) reimbursement for a portion of City and Agency
infrastructure costs in an amount to be negotiated.
R:~igendl.rl)t~=ulfmin.rde 1 · ~
In addition, revisions to the draft Old Town Specific Plan, as well as adoption of
Redevelopment Agency administrative guidelines for Old Town may be necessary. In
particular, the Redevelopment Plan requires Agency approval of any real property
development within the redevelopment area. Both the Old Town Specific Plan and the
Redevelopment Agency administration guidelines could be used to evaluate the conformity
of individual private developments with the Project.
FISCAL IMPACT: The initial cost of revising the Specific Plan Document to incorporate
the Project, including implementation measures for development of the "Shoot-out Zone"
(Pedestrian Mall) is difficult to estimate because a specific work program has not yet been
established.
R:~eeende.ret~/euffman.rda 2
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING
DEVELOPMENT OF OLD TOWN TEMECULA INTO A
MAJOR DESTINATION ENTERTAINMENT FACILITY .
This Memorandum of Understanding made this_ day of
, 1993, at Temecula, California, is entered into between the City of Temecula,
a Municipal Corporation ("City*), The Re, development Agency of the City of Temecula
("Agency"), and T.Z.B.G., INC. ("Buffman").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City and the Agency desire to induce ~he development within
the Old Town area of the City of Temecula of a major destination entertainment facility;
such a facility would include convening Old Town into a pedestrian mall with adjacent
parking and adequate traffic circulation, and the acquisition of land for the development and
construction of entertainment venue(s) for music, dance, and theme entertainment, such as
cabaret theaters, a tented "Wild West" show, a "Showboat," avenue for food and wine
shows, and/or other suitable venues ("hereinafter referred to as the "Project"); and
WI-IEREAS, Buffman desires to acquire the exclusive right to negotiate a
private/public partnership with the City and the Agency to develop the Project in Old Town.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hemto, enter into the following Memorandum
of Understanding:
1. GRANT OF OPTION
The City and the Agency hereby grant to Buffman the exclusive right to
negotiate a privates/public partnership with the City for development of the Project. This
option shall commence on the day and year first above written and shall remain in effect
until April 1, 1995. If however, efforts and progress are evident in the first 18 months of
this option, the option shall be extended for one (1) additional six (6) month period.
2. NEGOTIATIONS
A. Private/Public Partnership Agreement
Within the term of the Option or Extensions thereto, the parties shall negotiate
in good faith on the terms of a privateJpublic partnership agreement to provide for the
development and operation of the Project. The parties shall during the option period
commence discussions with planners/architects/engineers and other design personnel and
perform other necessary research and development to help achieve the Project's success.
The formal agreement will incorporate the following elements:
As
Buffman Retponsibilities:
(1) Development Phase:
(a)
Buffman will recommend planners/architects/engineers and
other design personnel to the City and the Agency, and assist
the City and the Agency, in developing conceptual plans for the
Project.
(2)
(b) Participate in preparation for the bid selection process for and
render assistance with the negotiation of contracts for the design
personnel.
Construction Phase:
Participate in preparation for the bid selection process for and
render assistance with the negotiation of a construction contract
with a general contractor for construction of the Project.
Co)
Participate with the City and the Agency, in the supervision and
guidance of construction of the Project, including without
limitation the following:
(i) Preparation of construction budget and schedule;
Preparation of engineering, soil, drainage, and other
technical reports;
Ctii) supervision and co-ordination of design
personnel and contractors;
Preparation of draw requests for construction fund
disbursements; and
(v)
Assist the City and the Agency, in selection of a
construction Project Manager.
Operation Phase:
(a)
· direct, supervise, manage and operate the Project under the
partnership agreement with the City, and determine the pwgram
and policies to be followed in connection therewith.
Purchase and maintain public and employer's liability,
workroans compensation, fh"e and extended coverage, and such
other customary insurance as necessary in the management and
operation of its elements of the Project.
(c) Carry out all maintenance relative to its elements of the Project;
The partnership agreement shall provide for payments by
Buffman to the City and the Agency .of (a) amounts equal to
City/Agency debt service on the bonds issued to cover the cost
of Buffman's elements of the Project; (b) specified percentage
payments of gross proceeds from operation of the Project; and
(c) reimbursement for a portion of City and Agency
infrastructure costs in an amount to be nlgotiated.
(e) Include "Temecula" in legal and operating name of the Project.
C. Cit~ and Agency ReSponsibilities:
1. Development Phase:
The City will make every effort to amend the proposed Specific Plan
for Old Town to comply with the needs of the Project. The City will
contract with the necessary design professionals to prepare an
appropriate amendment to the Specific Plan for submission to the City
Planning Commission; provided, that this Memorandum does not
restrict the discretion of the City Planning Commission, the City
Council, or the City itseft to approve or deny any amendment to the
Specific Plan.
Co)
The Agency Shall make every effort to establish administrative
guidelines with which all future development within Old Town must
comply, taking into consideration the needs, goals and plans of the
Project; provi.'ded, this Memorandum does not restrict the discretion of
the Agency to approve or deny any proposed guidelines. The
guidelines may specify the following development criteria:
(i) Architectural guidelines;
Use guidelines which would not only assure
consistency of uses but also be intended to avoid
duplication of uses to insure that a variety of
complementary services are available to the public
within Old Town;
(iii)
Criteria concerning themes, quality of services
and products, developed for businesses on real
properly locat~! in the Old Town area;
(iv) Proposed geographical locations for specific uses;
Review of any new use proposed for the Old Town area by the Agency would
consider all these criteria in determining whether or not the proposed use
conformed with the Re. development Plan, also taking into consideration the
needs, goals and plans of the Project.
,.
-2. Construction phase: ,
Upon execution of a formal partnership agreem~iit between the City,
Agency and Buffman, and adoption of a Specific Plan amendment, the
City and/or Agency will fland, commence and complete, or cause to be
completed, the construction of the Project.
3. TERMINATION
At the end of the option period, if the parties have not entered into a formal
private/public partnership for the Project, then this Memorandum shall terminate, and the
parties shall have no obligations to each other.
4. DAMAGES
Shall either party breach this Memorandum, the other party's damages shall be
limited to actual, out-of-pocket expenses in attempting to negotiate the partnership agreement.
In no event shall the breaching party be liable to the other party for damages in the form of
lost profits or consequential damages.
Dated: T.Z.B.G., INC.
By:
Dated:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
J. SAL MUNOZ, MAYOR
ATYEST:
/UNE S. GREEK, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
SCOTt F. FIFLD,
CITY ATTORNEY
Dated:
I~F-r~EVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
RONALD PARKS, CHAlKPERSON
ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK, RDA SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
SCOTt F. FIELD
GENERAL COUNS~T-