HomeMy WebLinkAbout102693 CC AgendaAGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER - 28816 Pujol Street
OCTOBER 26, 1993 - 7:00 PM
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will
determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00
PM and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting.
All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM
EXECUTIVE SESSION: 5:30 PM - Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to
Govemment Coda Section 54956.9(a), DawBa v. City of Temecula, 54956.9(b), and
Section 54956.8 (Real Property Negotiation with Honda of Temecula for the property
located at 27500 Jefferson, and Bank of America for property located North of
Winchester and West of Diaz, within Tract 21383.
CALL TO ORDER:
Invocation
Flag Salute
ROLL CALL:
PRESENTATIONS/
PRESENTATIONS
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 93-18
Resolution: No. 93-83
Mayor J. Sal Mur~oz presiding
Pastor Dan Hoekstra, Discovery Christian Church
Councilmember Stone
Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Mur~oz
Proclamation - Shop Temecula First Month
Proclamation - Red Ribbon Week
Introductions of Jr. Miss, Miss and Mrs. Temecula
by Chamber of Commerce
Swearing-in Ceremony - Public/Traffic Safety Commissioner -
Charles A. Coe
Presentation of Certificate of Appointment to new Commissioners
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council
on items that are not listed on the Agerids or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are
limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item
not listed on the Agenda or on the consent Calendar, a pink "Request To Speak" form
should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address.
For all other agenda items a 'Request To Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be
made at this time. A' total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these
reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION
1.1
Motion to waive the readingof the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Approve the minutes of September 21, 1993;
2.2
Approve the minutes of September 27, 1993;
2.3
Approve the minutes of September 28, 1993.
' 'alende'102613 2 10/21/13
3
Resolution Aoorovino List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
4 City Treasurer's Reoort
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Receive and file the City Treasurer's report as of August 31, 1993.
5 Memorandum of Understandina Regerdina Annexation of Johnson Ranch
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve the Memorandum of Understanding between the Johnson
Machinery Company and the City of Temecula.
6
Award Contract to Construct Additional 24" Corruoated Metal PiD e Located at 98841
Valleio
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Award a contract for construction and installation of an additional 24"
Corrugated Metal Pipe (CMP) culvert in the public right of way at 28841
Vallejo to Monteleone Excavating, the lowest responsible bidder for the
sum of $12,400.
7
Solid Waste Source Reduction end Recvclina Element and Household Hazardous Waste
Element
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
Accept the final draft of the Source Reduction and Recycling Element
(SRRE) and the Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE)as
required by the California Integrated Waste Management Act (AB 939);
7.2
Set December 14, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. at 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula,
CA as the time and place to conduct a public hearing to consider
testimony on the SRRE and HHWE;
Aeende/1028121 a 10/21/12
8
9
10
11
7.3 Direct the City Clerk to publish the attached Notice of Public Hearing in
the appropriate publication(s), with at least 30 days notice given prior
to the date set for public hearing.
7.4 Direct staff to submit copies of the final SRRE end HHWE to the
Riverside County Solid Waste Management Advisory Council Local Task
Force for review at least 30 days prior to the date set for public hearing.
Adootion of Travel Policv
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Continue to the meeting of November 9, 1993.
Records Destruction ADDrOVal
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the
City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
Contract Amendment No. 1 to Professional Services Contract for Civil Fnaineering.
Land Surveying. Structural Enoineerino. and Soils Testino - Liefar Road Crossino (PW
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1
Approve Contract Amendment No. I to provide additional structural
engineering services for Liefar Road crossing by McDaniel Engineering
Company, Inc. in the amount of $3,000.00.
Rancho California Water District Easement for Project No. PW93-03 CSD Pale
Community Park
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1
Approve the Rancho California Water District easement for the Pale
Community Park and authorize the Mayor to execute the document,
11.2
Direct the City Clerk to execute and record the easement document.
Aeerde/102e193 4
12
Comoletion and Acceotance of Traffic Sional Imorovements at Maroarita Road and La
Serena Way. Proiect No. PW9~-06
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1
Accept the Traffic Signal Construction at Margarita Road and La Serena
Way, Project No. PW92-06, as complete and direct the City Clerk to:
File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and
accept a six (6) month Maintenance Bond in accordance with
Caltrans standards in the amount of 10% of the contract;
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the
filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
13
Contract Change Orders No. ~1 throuah 26 for Ynez Road Widenina Project. PW92-05.
CFD 88-1 ~
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1
Approve Contract Change Orders No. 21 through 26 for Ynez Road
Widening Project, PW92-05 for labor and equipment for various items
of work, in the amount of $21,495.32.
14
Contract Amendment No. 5 to Community Facilities District 88-1~ Enaineerina
Services Contract with J.F. Davidson Associates. Inc.
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1
Approve Contract Amendment No. 5 to provide additional engineering
services for CFD 88-12 by J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. for the
Winchester Road Interchange Modifications in the amount of
$97,000.00.
15 Selection of TelePhone System for the Community Recreation Center
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1
Authorize the purchase of the telephone system for the Community
Recreation Center from Digital Communications, Inc. in the amount of
$25,955.
15.2
Appropriate $19,955 from the General Fund Unreserved Fund Balance
to account number 001-199-999-5603.
AOend~lO2el3 I 10/2t/13
PUBLIC HEARINGS
16
Aooeal of Plannina Commission ADDrOyal Of PA93-0009, Tentative Parcel MaD 9.5059,
First Extension of Time and PA93-O010, Plot Plan 34, First Extension of Time - Crystal
Ridae
(Continued from the meeting of 9/28/93)
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0009, FIRST EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 25059 TO SUBDIVIDE A 5.51 ACRE
PARCEL INTO 4 PARCELS LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF RIDGE PARK
DRIVE APPROXIMATELY 70 FEET SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOWS PARCEL NO. 945-130-0003
17
16.2
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0010, FIRST EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR PLOT PLAN NO. 94 TO CONSTRUCT A 102,243 SQUARE FOOT
OFFICE BUILDING, A 7,872 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT, A 7,000 SQUARE
FOOT RESTAURANT AND A FOUR LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE ON A 5.51
ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE
APPROXIMATELY 70 FEET SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 945-130-003
Vacation of a Portion of Second Street
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF SECOND STREET
SOUTHWESTERLY OF FRONT STREET PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY PROVIDED
BY CHAPTER 3, PART 3, DIVISION 9 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS
CODE
Aeende/lO2ee3 · 10/21Jl2
18
General Plan Adoption
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1
18.2
Review the Housing Element, remaining Clean-up Items, Environmental
Impact Report, Mitigation Monitoring Program and Statement of
Overriding Considerations, and direct staff to incorporate any changes
into the final General Plan;
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE
GENERAL PLAN AND ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
18.3
18.4
18.5
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FORTHE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE CITY
OF TEMECULA
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM FOR THE GENERAL PLAN FOR
THE CITY OF TEMECULA
f4ende/lO28e3 7 10/21/13
COUNCIL BUSINESS
19
20
21
Proposed Skateboard Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1
Receive report and provide direction to staff to prepare a skateboard
ordinance.
Temecula Museum
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1
Approve the modification and amendment of the City's land lease of
Sam Hicks Monument Park with the Old Town Temecula Historical
Museum Foundation.
20.2
Appoint two members to serve on a Project Committee for the Sam
Hicks Monument Park Improvement Project.
20.3
Authorize City staff to set a public hearing and prepare the agreements
necessary to provide the Old Town Temecula Historical Museum
Foundation with $500,000 in Redevelopment funding to improve the
existing church facility and construct a new museum facility.
Discussion of Chanqes in PlanninQ Procedures and Public Notice Reouirements
(Continued from the meeting of 9/28/93)
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1
Provide direction to staff.
22
Public/Traffic Safety Commission Ordinance Amendment
RECOMMENDATION:
22.1 Introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING CHAPTER 12.01 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING
TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY
COMMISSION
Aeendet102883 I 10/21
23
Old Town Temecula Merchants Association Reouest for Fundino
RECOMMENDATION:
23.1 Consider a request from the Old Town Temecula Merchants Association
to fund $24,000.00 to cover advertising on billboard which IDromotes
Old Town.
24
Banning Director's Reoort on Pechanpa Resort/Casino
(Placed on the agenda at the request of Mayor Mu~oz)
A verbal presentation by Director of Banning Gary Thornhill,
25
Discussion of Proposition No. 172
(Placed on the agenda at the request of Councilmember Parks)
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: November 9,
28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
1993, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center,
Aeende/102893 ·
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETINn - (To be held at 8:00)
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
PUBLIC COMMENT:
President Patricia H. Birdsall
DIRECTORS:
Mur~oz, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should
present a completed pink 'Request to Speak" to the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state
your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
Approve the minutes of the meeting of September 28, 1993.
2 Acceotance of Grant Deed for Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park - The Preslev Comoanies
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Accept a grant deed from The Presley Companies for Kent Hintergardt
Memorial Park, a nine (9) acre park within Tract No. 23267-2, subject
to the Presley Companies making suitable arrangements to clear title of
the reservoir easement. Such arrangements shall be approved by the
Director of Community Services and the City Attorney.
3
Award of Contract for Construction of Pala Community Park (Project No. PW93-03
CSD)
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Approve the plans and specifications for the construction of Pala
Commun. ity Park, Project No. PW93-03 CSD;
3.2
Award a construction contract in the amount of $2,757,566. to Martin
J. Jaska, Inc. and authorize the President to execute the contract;
~eee~e/102613 10 10/21/11
4
6
3.3 Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed
fie contingency of $275,756.60 which is equal to 10% of the contract
amount;
3.4 Approve an agreement with Kingsway Development Corporation to
reimburse the City $149,015. for off-site street and flood control
improvements.
Community Services Recreation Brochure
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Accept proposal of $20,893. from Graphics Unlimited to produce two
(2) issues of the Community Services Recreation Brochure.
Contract Amendment - California Landscaoe. Inc.
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
Amend contract with California Landscape, Inc. for landscape
maintenance services, to include John Magee Park, Kent Hintergardt
Memorial Park, and the Medians Service Area.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
7
Contract Amendment - Excel Landscaoe
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Amend the contract for landscape maintenance services with Excel
Landscape to include the addition of Slope Service Area "A".
Flood Control Consideration - Northwest Sports Complex
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Receive and file report concerning the
feasibility of utilizing the
Northwest Sports Complex 'for recreation and flood retention purposes.
Emergency Commercial Landscape Program
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
8.2
Approve the implementation of an emergency commercial landscape
program for the City of Temecula;
Appropriate $17,000 from TCSD Service Level "C" Fund Balance to
account #190-180-999-5240 to provide minimdm landscaping services
for Crystal Ridge Business Park;
/~end~/102813 11 10/21/13
8.3
Authorize the General Manager to execute a reimbursement agreement
with Crystal Ridge Business Park concerning emergency commercial
landscaping services.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT - Dixon
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelaon
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting November 9, 1992, 8:00 PM, Temecula
Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
.~gende/102693
12
10/21/13
TEMECULA REDFVELOPMENT A~ENCY MEETING
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding
AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Roberts,
Parks
Stone, Mu~oz,
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a
completed pink 'Request to Speak' to the City Clerk. When you
are called to speak, please come forward and state your name
and address for the record.
AGENCY BUSINESS
I Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of September 28, 1993.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting November 9, 1993, 8:00
Community Center, 28816, Temecula, California
Temecula
Aeende/102893 t3 10/21/13
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
The City of Temecula
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, businesses rely heavily on their community for their livelihood; and
WHEREAS, the community relies on and deserves the taxes generated from the local
sale of products and services which are used to provide essential services such as traffic control
and police protection for its citizens; and
W'FrF~REAS, the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce has created the 'Shop
Temecula First" campaign to encourage shopping locally for goods and services during the
holiday shopping period, and
WHEREAS, during the past year the City of Temecula has grown, adding several major
shopping areas, over 200 new 'service-oriented businesses and other convenient shopping options
for residents,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, I. Sal Mu~oz, on behalf of the City Council of the City of
Temecula, hereby proclaim the month of November, 1993, to be
"SHOP TEMECULA FIRST MONTH"
in recognition of the benefits to citizens and businesses and encourage participation in this
program.
IN WI17qF_~S WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City
of Temecula to be affixed this 261h day of October, 1993.
J. Sai Mu~oz, ayo
The City of Temecula
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, alcohol and other drug abuse has reached epidemic stages in the United
States, and
WHEREAS, it is imperative that community members launch unified and visible
substance abuse prevention education programs and activities to eliminate the demand for these
substances; and
WHEREAS, Californians for Drug-free Youth, Inc. coordinates the annual Red Ribbon
Celebration in Cooperation with the National Federation of Parents to offer citizens the
opportunity to demonstrate their commitment to healthy, drug-free lifestyles; and
WHEREAS, President Clinton is the National Honorary Chairman and Governor and
Mrs. Wilson are the State Honorary Chairpersons to provide national and state focus on a Drug-
free America; and
WHEREAS, the Red Ribbon Celebration will be observed across America by parents,
youth, government, business, law enforcement, schools, religious institutions, service
organizations, social and health services, media and the general public who will demonstrate
their commitment to drug-free communities by wearing and displaying Red Ribbons; and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula further commits resources to ensure the success of
the Red Ribbon Campaign,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, J. Sal Mu~oz, on behalf of the City Council of the City Of
Temecula, hereby proclaim October 23 through October 31, 1993 to be
RIBBON WEEK"
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City
of Temecula to be affixed this 261h day of October, 1993.
Ik
1989
' j. Sal/":::~4-~Mufi/~z,M~or
ITEM
NO.
ITEM
NO.
2
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 1993
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order on Tuesday,
September 21, 1993, 7:05 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street,
Temecula, California. Mayor J. Sal Mur~oz presiding. Councilmember Birdsall led the flag
salute.
PRESENT: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Mufioz
ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberrs
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, Assistant City Manager Harwood Edvalson,
City Attorney Scott F. Field, City Clerk June S. Greek and Recording Secretary Gail Zigler.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
None
PUBLIC HEARINGS
City of Temecula General Plan. Implementation ProQram. Environmental Impact Report
and Mitieation Monitorine Proeram
Housing Element
Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report.
Mayor Mu~oz opened the public hearing at 7:30 P.M. There being no requests to
speak, the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve
by consensus of the Housing Element as proposed. The motion was unanimously
carried with Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs absent.
Clean-Up Items and Revisions Addendum
Request No. 30:
CCMIN09121193 -1- 10/06/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 21. 1993
Planning Director Gary Thornhill stated the project is directly adjacent to a proposed
high school and bus facility, therefore staff feels a community commercial designation
is appropriate for this site.
The Council approved by consensus Community Commercial designation for Request
No. 30.
Request No. 64:
Mayor Mu~oz opened the public hearing at 7:45 P.M. There being no requests to
speak, the public hearing was closed.
The Council approved by consensus a Medium Density Residential designation for
Request No. 64.
Request No. 65:
Mayor Mu~oz opened the public hearing at 8:00 P.M. There being no requests to
speak, the public hearing was closed.
The Council approved by consensus Business Park/Service Commercial designation for
Request No. 65.
Iris Abernathy, 43980 Margarita Road, Temecula, addressed the Council regarding her
previous request for a change in land use designation to Neighborhood Commercial on
Request No. 22. Ms. Abernathy said the Council approved a designation of low-
medium housing, however, she asked the Council to reconsider her request for
Neighborhood Commercial.
Senior Planner John Meyer stated the Planning Commission approved the low-medium
housing land use designation rather than the neighborhood commercial based on the
close proximity of the property to the elementary school.
'Councilmember Stone asked Ms. Abernathy if she would agree to an office
professional designation.
Mayor Mu~oz advised he was in receipt of a petition from the Los Ranchitos
Homeowners Association stating they are opposed to any lots being zoned
commercial.
The unanimous consensus of the Council was to approve a designation of
Office/Professional for Request No. 22.
Carol Corazza, 44220 La Paz Street, Temecula, representing the Los Ranchitos
Homeowners Association, presented the Council with a petition of opposition to the
re-zoning of four parcels, Lots 3 and 7, to commercial. Ms. Corazza said the
CCMINOgl21/93 -2- 10/06/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPT;MBER 21. 1993
homeowners are concerned that if these four parcels are re-zoned'commercial, the
property owners along the rest of Highway 79 South are likely to come forward to
request commercial designations. Ms. Corazza said 58% of the homeowners have
opposed this zone change and request no further zone changes until additional access
along Highway 79 South has been addressed.
Councilmember Birdsall stepped down due to a potential conflict of interest.
Mayor Mu~oz asked if the Los Ranchitos Homeowners Association would approve an
office professional designation.
Ms. Corazza said there are still the same concerns with an office professional
designation.
Councilmember Stone said he feels the property owner can provide a quality project
which will buffer the Los Ranchitos homeowners as well as provide the property
owners with a means for marketing his property.
Senior Planner John Meyer explained the property in question is located in Assessment
District 161 which at a later date will be developed with 130 foot right-of-way.
Currently Kemper has retained a traffic consultant to perform e corridor-wide traffic
study addressing access along Highway 79 South. Once completed, staff is prepared
to take this study to Cal Trans and request an amendment to the memorandum of
understanding. Mr. Meyer said staff has considered a garden office type project with
building structures comparable to the adjacent properties.
John Moramarco, P.O. Box 906, Temecula, owner of the subject property, said he has
tried to work with the Association for the past few years with very little success. Mr.
Moramarco said no one has approached him over the last fifteen years to build on the
parcel.
Chuck Lombardo, 42720 Las Violettas Circle, Temecula, also an owner of the subject
property said they have tried to work with the Los Ranchitos Homeowners Association
but the association has not been open to the presentations. Mr. Lombardo said he
feels there are several vacancies in the existing professional office properties and he
would prefer a commercial designation.
The Council approved by consensus a designation of Office/Professional for parcels No.
3 and 7 in the Los Ranchitos area with Councilmember Birdsall abstaining and Mayor
Pro Tem Roberts absent.
Michall Lanni, 1907 Yacht Truant, Newport Beach, representing Tentative Tract
24172, said his property is zoned into half acre lots, with adjoining property having
14,000 square foot lots on one side, half acre lots on the other side, and 2 1/2 acres
lots to the south. He asked if the special study area designation will change his
existing land use.
CC MIN0912 1193 -3- 10/06/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 91. 1993
Councilmember Parks stepped down due to a potential conflict of interest.
Senior Planner John Meyer advised the parcel is located in the Chaparral area which
staff is recommending be changed from very low to low density, however, because
this parcel is an approved Tentative Tract Map it can be found to be consistent with
the General Plan.
The Council approved by consensus the recommended one-acre minimum designation
for Tentative Tract No. 24172 with the understanding that 1/2 acre will be consistent
with the general plan based upon the existing entitlements for the property.
Mayor Mur~oz declared a recess at 8:55 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:05 P.M.
Circulation Element
Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report.
Councilmember Parks said he recalls the Council previously approved alternative B.
Planner Meyer said the Council actually recommended alternative C which was to look
at the extension of North General Kearney and to look at the extension of Nicolas
Road. The traffic consultant combined B and C and the real benefit to Winchester
Road was found to be extending North General Kearney and adding Nicolas Road. The
Council subsequently removed the North General Kearney extension end staff re-
analyzed the data, concluded the Nicolas Road extension without North General
Kearney was no significant value to the circulation plan.
Councilmember Parks said he feels there needs to be some kind of road network tying
Nicolas Road into Margarita Road at the proposed high school location. He suggested
a road that runs parallel along Santa Gertrudes Creek tying into Margarita Road.
Councilmember Birdsall said she wasn't sure that a parallel road would work in this
area. She said she feels there needs to be access at the Nicolas end Winchester
intersection from the high school.
Csaba Ko, representing Kernper Real Estate Development, advised there currently is
a signal proposed for Winchester Road and Roripaugh. He added that there is a
temporary road that links up with Costco and runs along the creek for bus access.
Councilmember Parks said he would have concerns with the bus barn exiting at
Roripaugh. He said he feels the buses should be out on the major thoroughfare and
not use Roripaugh Road for bus access.
Mayor Mu~oz asked for an explanation of why the language addressing the change of
Highway 79 North from a state highway to a urban arterial was deleted.
CCMINO9121193 -4- 10/0~/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 21, 1993
Senior Planner John Meyer said he thought this was an oversight on steff's part.
Councilmember Parks said he feels that this should not be included in the goals and
policies of the General Plan but is a direction to staff.
The overall consensus of the Council was to direct staff to revise the language
contained in Policy 1.3 of the Circulation Element as it relates to the redesignation of
Highway 79 North.
K.S. Chen, 6984 Overlook Terrace, Temecula, representing the parcel located on Ynez
Road, next to the Target Center, known as "The Plaza". Mr. Chen said the I~roject is
ready for submittal to the Planning Department and he learned last week that a new
road may pass between his parcel and the Target Center.
Planning Director Gary Thornhill explained that approximately eight months earlier, the
property owners and the staff did not agree on a proposed project. The property
owner then went back and re-designed the project and during the interim a proposed
route was discussed. 'Director Thornhill said the City has agreed to work with the
applicant on their parking requirements in return for their cooperation in providing the
necessary right-of-way to provide for this circulation element.
Senior Planner John Meyer explained the proposed route was a recommendation by
Csaba Ko of Kemper, at the first meeting of the circulation sub-committee. He said
at the second meeting the traffic consultant analyzed the route and found it to provide
a viable access. Mr. Meyer added there are very limited opportunities to add new links
to the city's circulation element and the traffic model demonstrates it is necessary to
have this link.
Csaba Ko advised the Council that he was participating on the circulation sub-
committee as a member of the general public and made the recommendation for this
route in that capacity.
Mr. Chen said he feels the City should provide him with a time schedule for building
this road.
Councilmember Parks said he feels the City should keep this alignment and suggested
staff work with the applicant on securing the dedication of easement to build the road.
The overall consensus of the Council was to direct staff to work with the applicant.
Councilmember Parks moved to extend the meeting at 10:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M.
School Facilities Policy
Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report.
CCM IN09/21/93 -S- 10/0Ei93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTI:MBER 91. 1993
City Attorney Scott Field outlined 8 letter to the school district dated September 17,
1993 proposing changed language for the general plan policy. He said the changes did
not incorporate the school district asked for but the most significant change is in the
implementation program, Item No. 3. The school district proposes a commitment from
the City that it will adopt a mitigation ordinance or resolution consistent with what
was previously proposed to the Council what the County has adopted. Mr. Field said
legal counsel recommends continued dialogue between the City and the school district
in recognition of the fact that Senate Bill 1287 places substantial constraints on the
ability of the City to try to achieve the additional mitigation funding that the district is
asking for.
Attorney Field said new correspondence, received this date from the school district's
legal counsel, requests some correction in the language. Mr. Field said staff
recommends the following modification to Page 2, regarding the E.I.R., second
sentence; "Full mitigation is not feasible due to the legal constraints imposed on the
provision and funding of schools." Also, the letter from the school district dated
September 21,1993, indicated a willingness to share in the defense costs of potential
litigation in the event the City was sued as s result of the school district's proposed
policy. Mr. Field clarified that defense costs are not the only issue that would be
presented to the City in the event of a law suit.
Mayor Mufioz opened the public hearing at 10:20 P.M.
Tom VanHoorst, 3600 Lime Street, #221, Riverside, representing the Building Industry
Association for Riverside County, stated the BJ.A. is opposed to the proposed
language by the school district.
Brian Noreen, 30381 Red River Circle, Temecula, General Manager of Kemper Real
Estate, expressed support of the proposed language presented by the City's legal
counsel. Mr. Noreen said Kemper Real Estate also supports the school districts efforts
to provide excellent education to this community.
Dave Gallaher, representing the Temecule Valley Unified School District, 31350
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, asked the Council to support the language presented
by the school district and reiterated the school district would stand behind the City of
Temecula in the event the City is involved in litigation stemming from approval of this
policy language.
Daniel Wood, 30205 Menifee Road, Menifee, representing the Menifee Unified School
District, expressed support of the language proposed in Exhibit A. Mr. Wood explained
that Menifee is currently working under this language with success.
Jean Fernia, 30831 Avenida Buena Serte, Temecula, expressed support for the
language proposed by the Temecula Valley School District.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to extend
CCM IN09121/93 -6- 10/06/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 21. 1993
the meeting from 11:00 to 11:45 P.M.
Sam Alhadeff, 27555 Ynez Road, #203, Temecula, legal counsel for Kemper Real
Estate, expressed support of the language which is proposed by staff. Mr. Alhadeff
explained that the agreements entered into with the Menifee School District, were
projects under County jurisdiction, not the City of Menifee. Mr. Alhadeff said the City
would be subject to litigation relative to delay of project, cost of delays, attorney fees,
financial impacts, etc., should a developer be required to go before the school district
to address school impact fees.
Councilmember Birdsall expressed a concern with the going against what the City's
legal counsel has recommended.
Councilmember Parks said he feels the Council should support the recommendation of
the City Attorney.
Councilmember Stone said he supports the school districts efforts to provide a quality
education however, it does not agree the developer should be responsible for these
costs. Mr. Stone suggested a change to the language stating the school district should
exhaust all avenues of funding before the City goes to the extreme of attaching the
costs to the development communities as follows:
"Adequate school facilities and funding are necessary to ensure the high quality of
education is extended to future residents of the City. Mitigating impacts of
development on the school system including statutory development fees, and other
revenue sources, such as, but not limited to general obligation bonds. In the event
that these sources prove to be inadequate, voluntary negotiated developmental fees
with developers can be pursued as permitted by law and/or density adjustments will
be implemented to represent the deficiency in the mitigation fees."
Mayor Mu~oz said based on the newest materials received and comments and
recommendations made tonight, he suggests this item be continued to allow staff to
work with the school district to eleviate these concerns.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to refer
the School Facilities Mitigation measures to be included in the Growth
Management/Public Facilities Element to staff to address specific language
modifications as discussed. The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Pro Tem
Roberrs absent.
Adjournment
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
adjourn at 11:45 P.M. and continue the General Plan Public Hearing to the regular
meeting of October 12, 1993.
CCMIN09121193 -7- 10/06/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER ~1, 1993
The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Pro Tem Roberts absent.
PRESENT: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Mu~ioz
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberrs
CITY MANAGER REPORT
None
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
None
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Muftoz declared the meeting adjourned at 11:45 P.M.
The next regular meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on, Tuesday,
September 28, 1993, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula,
California.
ATTEST:
Mayor J. Sal Murtoz
City Clerk June S. Greek
CCMIN09/21193 -8- 1 O/06193
MINUTES OF A WORKSHOP MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY SEPTEMBER 27, 1993
A workshop of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order on Monday, September
27, 1993, 7:05 P.M., at the Temecula City Hall Main Conference Room, 43174 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, California. Mayor J. Sal Mufioz presiding. Mayor Pro Tam Roberrs led the
flag salute.
PRESENT: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Perks, Robarts, Stone,
Muf~oz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, Assistant City Manager Herwood Edvalson,
City Attorney Scott F. Field, City Clerk June S. Greek and Recording Secretary Gail Zigler.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. Workshop with Zev Buffman reaardina Prospective AmDhitheatre
Zev Buffman presented his vision for the Old Town area as a major tourist destination,
depicting the early western era. Mr. Buffman outlined various ideas for the theme of
this attraction such as; wild west shows, cabaret theatres, showboat, venus for food
and wine shows, etc. He proposed the City fund construction of infrastructure
improvements and his company will be responsible for the operation of the attractions.
Mr. Buffman asked for the Council's support by entering into a Memorandum of
Understanding to study the feasibility of the proposed development.
Each Councilmember expressed support of the proposal and a desire to enter into the
MOU for the eighteen months.
Planning Director Gary Thornhill advised that during the Old Town Specific Plan
preparation, several studies have been performed on circulation, flooding, etc., end
may be useful in the design of this project.
Mr. Buffman expressed concern that the MOU doesn't preclude another individual from
coming in and buying up several blocks within the proposed development area.
Carlene Danielson, representing the Economic Development Corporation, expressed
support of Mr. Buffman's proposal, on behalf of the EDC.
CCM~09127/93 - 1 - 10/06/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER ~7. 1993
Councilmember Birdsall volunteered to represent the City Council on a committee
which will work with Mr. Buffman.
The overall consensus of the City Council was to approve the proposal and to direct
staff to place approval of an MOU, with language acceptable to both Mr. Buffman and
the City Attorney, on the October 12, 1993 City Council agenda.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
None
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
None
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to adjourn at 8:45
P.M.
The next regular meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on Tuesday, October
1993.
Mayor J. Sal Muf~oz
ATTEST:
City Clerk June S. Greek
CCMINOg/27/93 -2- 10/05/93
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 1993
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order on Tuesday,
September 28, 1993, 7:15 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street,
Temecula, California. Mayor J. Sal Mur~oz presiding.
PRESENT: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs, Stone,
Mur~oz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, Assistant City Manager Harwood Edvalson,
City Attorney Scott F. Field, City Clerk June S. Greek and Recording Secretary Gail Zigler.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:30 P.M., Pursuant
to Government Code Section 54956.9(b) - Zone Change 93-0043, it was moved by
Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to adjourn to Executive Session at
5:32 P.M.
The meeting was reconvened at 7:10 P.M. in regular session with ell members present.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Associate Pastor Pat Dezort, World Harvest Outreach.
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
A Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting was presented to the City
of Temecula from the Government Finance Officers Association for fiscal year 1992.
City Manager David Dixon commended Finance Officer Mary Jane McLarney and her staff on
receiving this recognition.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Mike Thesing, 30291 Via Brisa, Temecula, representing the Old Town Temecula Merchant's
Association, requested the City Council approve a grant in the amount of $24,000 for the
cost of a one year lease for the Old Town Temecula billboard.
Frank Spencer, representing the Old Town Temecula Merchant's Association, asked for the
City Council's support in granting funds to pay for the billboard advertising Old Town
Temecula. Mr. Spencer also asked the City to add Old Town Temecula to the City's kiosk
sign program.
CCM IN09/28193 - 1 - I
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 28. 1993
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to add
Environmental Reports for the Pechanga Reservation Development to the agenda on the basis
of an urgency which arose after publication of the agenda. The motion was unanimously
carried.
Councilmember Stone advised he had a meeting with the District Representative for Senator
Ron Packard's office and the topic of discussion was the proposed Pechanga Indian Casino.
Councilmember Stone said the proponents are proposing an Environmental Assessment in lieu
of the Environmental Impact Study. Councilmember Stone asked the Councilmembers to
support sending a letter to federal officials requesting a complete E.I.S. on the proposed
project.
Mayor Mur~oz suggested the Pechanga Tribe be advised of this action prior to sending any
letters.
Planning Director Gary Thornhill said the letter should refer to the potential negative impacts
of the proposed project on the community rather than request an E.I.S.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to direct staff to
prepare appropriate letters to Congressman Packard requesting that a full Environmental
Impact Study be prepared for the proposed development on the Pechanga Indian Reservation,
to be signed by the Mayor and further, to direct staff to advise the Pechange Tribal Council
of this action.
The motion was unanimously carried.
Councilmember Parks stated he attended a conference of California Contract Cities and a
guest speaker from Sacramento forecasted the deficit problems for the state will continue for
the next year. Councilmember Parks said it was stated that the governor is forming a
committee to evaluate the responsibilities of cities vs. counties vs. states, and Councilmember
Parks suggested the City get further information on this matter.
Mayor Mu~oz, announced that as a Member of the Board for the Riverside Transit Agency,
he met recently and one of the items on the agenda was renewal of the contract for Route
23. Mayor Mu~oz advised the RTA will be requesting bids to include the Murrieta Dial-A-Ride.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs removed Item No. 12 from the Consent Calendar for discussion.
Mayor Mu~oz removed Item No. 13 from the Consent Calendar for discussion.
CCMIN09128193 -2- 10/05/93
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTI:MB;:R ~8, 1993
Councilmember Parks questioned if Item No. 7, establishing a Petty Cash Fund, was for only
one City Department. Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer, advised him that this fund is
used by all departments with the exception of Community Services which has a separate
Petty Cash Fund.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve
Consent Calendar Items I - 11, 14 and 15, with Item No. 6 continued at staff's request.
The motion was unanimously carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall,
Mufioz
None
None
Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Standard Ordinance Adoorion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of August 17, 1993;
2.2 Approve the minutes of August 31, 1993;
e
Resolution Aoorovinq List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-72
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
CCMIN09128193 -3- 10/06/83
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
4.
SI::PTEMB;:R ;~8, 1993
Combinino Balance Sheets as of June 30. 1993 and the Statement of Revenues.
Exoenditures and Chanoes in Fund Balance. and the Statement of Revenues. Fxoenses
and Changes in Retained Earnings for the Year Ended June 30. 1993
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheets as of June 30, 1993 and
the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance,
and the Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained
Earnings for the Year Ended June 30, 1993.
Resolution to Particioate in the Alternative Method for Distribution of Tax Levies and
Collections and of Tax Sale Proceeds Adooted bv the County of Riverside
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-77
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA MADE
PURSUANT TO SECTION 4715 OF THE REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE OF
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AGREEING TO PARTICIPATE IN THE
ALTERNATIVE METHOD FOR DISTRIBUTION OF TAX LEVIES AND
COLLECTIONS AND OF TAX SALE PROCEEDS ADOPTED BY THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE
Adoorion of Travel Policy
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Continue to the meeting of October 12, 1993
Resolution Establishinq Petty Cash Fund for the City of Temecula
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-78
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
ESTABLISHING A "PETTY CASH" FUND
OF TEMECULA
CCMIN09128/93 -4- 10/06/93
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
8.
e
10.
11.
Final Vesting Tract MaD No. ~6861-F
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
SEPTFMBFR 98, 1993
Approve Final Vesting Tract Map No. 26861-F subject to the attached
Conditions of Approval.
Final Vestinn Tract Man No. 23125-1
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Approve Final Vesting Tract Map No. 23125-1 subject to the attached
Conditions of Approval.
Access to State and Local Summarv Criminal History Information
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-79
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AUTHORIZING ACCESS TO SUMMARY CRIMINAL HISTORY INFORMATION
THROUGH FINGERPRINT CHECKS
Vacation of a Portion of Second Street
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-80
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF SECOND
STREET SOUTHWESTERLY OF FRONT STREET AND SETTING A PUBLIC
HEARING THEREON PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY PROVIDED BY CHAPTER
3, PART 3, DIVISION 9 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
CCMIN09128/93 -5- 10K)6193
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 28. 1993
14.
Community Facilities District 88-12. Reimbursement Aereements for Work Performed
Durine the Construction of Ynez Road Widenine Project (PW92-05)
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1
Approve a reimbursement agreement with Rancon Realty Limited
Partnership for improvements to be constructed by the City's Contractor
for the Ynez Road Widening Project PW92-05, in the amount of
$27,769.27.
15. Lease of Shared Yard Facility for Public Works and Community Services Deoartments
RECOMMENDATION: ·
15.1
Approve the lease agreement between Richard Gabriel and the City of
Temecula, for property located at 28763 Front Street (corner of Front
and 1st Street) for use as a combined public works and community
services department maintenance yard; and authorize the Mayor to
execute the agreement.
12.
Award of Contract for Pujol St. and First St. Street Widening (Project No. PW92-09)
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts expressed concern with approving this item, based on the
statements made in a letter from A.L. Chavez Enterprises, referring to a bid
requirement that attendance at the pre-bid conference was mandatory. The letter
further stated the low bidder was not present at that conference.
Councilmember Stone expressed the same concerns.
Director of Public Works Tim Serlet said attendance at the pre-bid conference is
typically not mandatory, nor is it a state or federal law, however, it was a part of this
bid package.
City Attorney Scott Field suggested the C'ouncil reject all bids submitted and request
new bids.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to reject
all bids received for Project No. PW92-09 and start the bid process over as soon as
possible, correcting any ambiguities that have become part of this bid procedure.
The motion was unanimously carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Mu~oz
CCMIN09/28193 -6- 10/06/~3
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
SEPTEMBER 28, 1993
13.
Contract Chanae Orders No. 14, and 17 throuah 20 for Ynez Road Widening Project.
PW92-05. CFD88-12
Mayor Mur~oz expressed concern regarding the number of change orders processed
through CFD88-12. Mayor Muf~oz said he feels any errors which are made, that result
in a change order, should be paid for by the party responsible for generating the
change order.
Director of Public Works Tim Serlet explained those parties responsible for generating
the change orders have agreed to pay their portion of the costs.
It was moved by Mayor Mu~oz, seconded by Councilmember stone to approve staff
recommendation for Consent Calendar Item No. 13 as follows:
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1
Approve Contract Change Orders No. 14, and 17 through 20 for Ynez
Road Widening Project, PW92-05 for labor and equipment for various
items of work, in the amount of $76,703.33.
The motion was unanimously carried as follows:
AYES:
5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Mu~oz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
PUBLIC HEARINGS
17.
Aooeal of Planninq Commission Aooroval of PA93-0009. Tentative Parcel Mao No.
25059, First Extension of Time and PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, First Extension of
Time - Crystal Ridae -
Mayor Mu~oz opened the public hearing at 7:45 P.M. There being no requests to
speak, the public hearing was continued.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to continue
CCMIN09128193 -7- 10/06/93
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 98, 1993
Appeal of Planning Commission Approval of PA93-0009, Tentative Parcel Map No.
25059, First Extension of Time and PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, First Extension of
Time - Crystal Ridge to the meeting of October 26, 1993.
The motion was unanimously carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall,
Mufioz
None
None
Parks, Roberts, Stone,
16.
Resolution Amendina Exoenditure of Tax Increment Funds of The Redevelooment
AQencv for Construction of Senior Citizen Center
Finance Officer Mary :Jane McLarney presented the staff report.
Mayor Mur~oz opened the public hearing at 7:50 P.M. There being no requests to
speak the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to close
the public hearing at 7:50 P.M. and approve staff recommendations as follows:
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-81
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING THE EXPENDITURE OF TAX INCREMENT FUNDS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SENIOR CITIZEN
CENTER IN A REDEVELOPMENT AREA
The motion was unanimously carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Mur~oz
None
None
CCMIN09/28193 -8- 10105/93
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
COUNCIL BUSINESS
19.
SEPTEMB;:R 28, 1993
Certification of Referendum Petitions
City Clerk June Greek presented the staff report and recommended the following:
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Receive and file the City Clerk's Certificate of Sufficiency;
19.2 Provide instruction to staff on the desired future course of action.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
approve staff recommendation 19.1 and to repeal Ordinance No. 93-13.
The motion was unanimously carried as follows:
AYES: 5 -COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall,
Mur~oz
None
None
Parks, Roberts, Stone,
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to read
by title only Ordinance No. 93-17 and waive further reading.
ORDINANCE NO. 93-17
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 93-13.
The motion was unanimously carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:.'
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
Birdsall,
Mu~oz
None
None
Parks, Roberts, Stone,
John Dedovich, 39450 Long Ridge Drive, Temecula, stated he feels the City Council
should have performed a public survey prior to proceeding with their previous action
on Wal Mart.
Bryan Noreen, 30831 Red River Circle, Temecula, General Manager of Kemper
CCMIN09128193 -9- 10/O5193
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 28. 1993
Community Development Company, advised the Council that Kemper believes the
petition, which was submitted, is legally insufficient and invalid, is inconsistent with
the proposed General Plan and inconsistent with the findings of the Planning
Commission and the City Council. Mr. Noreen said Kemper feels the commercial
zoning is appropriate for this parcel.
Councilmember Parks said the City needs to encourage major retail users to come to
the City to help pay for the infrastructure improvements the City needs.
Councilmember Parks said although he feels the project end the approval for zone:
change was done in the best interest of the community, he supports the motion
because of the efforts of the citizens who obtained the necessary signatures and the
will of those who signed the petitions opposing the City Council's action.
Mayor Muftoz declared a recess at 8:10 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 8:50 P.M.
following the Temecula Community Services District and Redevelopment Agency meetings.
18.
Status Report on Vendina Carts
Mayor Mu~oz stepped down due to a potential conflict of interest.
Planning Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report.
Councilmember Birdsall stated she feels use of vending carts as a marketing tool will
increase in the future. She said she has spoken with many of the merchants in Old
Town and they have indicated they do not have a problem with the vending carts and
some feel they stimulate interest in Old Town.
Robert Lord, 30120 Pechanga Drive, Temecula, Property Manager of Butterfield
Square, said he was originally opposed to the vending carts because he felt they
represented unfair competition with shop owners and tenants, however, he has
changed his thoughts and is currently constructing two vending carts to be used in the
Butterfield Square Plaza to enhance those businesses in the center.
Frank Spencer, President of the Old Town Merchants Association, said a survey was
done and a majority of the shop owners expressed concern about the vending carts.
Mr. Spencer said he agrees that the carts could enhance the area, however, he feels
there needs to be stricter standards on their operation. Mr. Spencer suggested the
City could construct carts, finance the carts through the Main Street program and
lease them. Mr. Spencer said he feels there should be a limit on the number of carts
to be operated on any property and in the Old Town area.
Audrey Hicks, 28636 Front Street//100, Temecula, expressed opposition to the
vending carts in Old Town at this time. Ms. Hicks said she feels the standards should
be established before any other carts are allowed to operate in the City.
CCMIN09/28/93 - 1 O- 10/05193
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 98, 1993
City Attorney Scott Field said there have been inconsistencies in the past and
suggested until adoption of the Old Town Specific Plan, staff permit no additional
vending carts without a special event permit.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to direct
staff to review the current policies for street vendors and require a special event permit
and a business license for all vending cart applications and direct staff to re-evaluate
street vendor uses under the Old Town Specific Plan.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Mur~oz
21.
Community Services Commission ADoointment
City Clerk June S. Greek presented the staff report.
Councilmember Parks stated that Commissioner Hillin has worked very hard on the
Community Services Commission and he would like the Council to formally recognize
his participation.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Stone to
approve staff recommendation and direct staff to arrange for a presentation to
Commissioner Hillin at the October 12, 1993 City Council meeting.
RECOMMENDATION:
The motion was unanimously carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall,
Mur~oz
None
None
Parks, Roberts, Stone,
22.
Consideration of Fundinq Reouest for Local Health Clinic SPonsored by Shard Hospital
of Murrieta
CCMIN09/28193 - 11 - 10/06/93
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTFMBER 28. 1993
(Placed on the agenda at the request of Mayor Muf~oz)
Mayor Muftoz introduced Jerrold Novotney of Sharp Healthcare, who presented the
City Council with a report on the health care needs in the community. Mr. Novotney
said that currently there is a facility in the County Administrative Center in Temecula
which is not occupied due to budget constraints. He said the County has agreed to
provide that facility at no cost. Mr. Novotney outlined the services to be provided as
follows: general medical, perinatal services, well-child exams, pediatric specialty care,
pregnancy counseling/gynecology, preventative services and nutrition counseling. Mr.
Novotney asked the Council to provide financial assistance to Sharp Healthcare in the
start-up cost of this facility in the amount of $35,000. Mr. Novotney said Sharp has
agreed to contribute 950,000 and Supervisor Buster has agreed to contribute
950,000. A request for 922,000 will be presented to 'the City of Murrieta. Mr.
Novotney said that several of the local service clubs have agreed to provide fund
raisers to create funding for the facility. The doctors have agreed to donate their time
at the clinic. Mr. Novotney added that if the communities agree to participate, the
Irvine based operation will match those funds.
Johnathon Hunter, Chief Operations Officer for the Episcopal Community Services,
said the primary reason for the up-front money was to provide operating cash until the
billing sources generated income.
As a whole, the Council expressed their strong support of the program.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve
a $35,000 allocation for a grant from the City of Temecula to facilitate establishment
of a health clinic in partnership with Sharp Hospital, Episcopal Community Services,
the County of Riverside, City of Murrieta and other Community participants.
The motion was unanimously carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Mu~oz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: '* None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
20.
Discussion of AODrOval Matrix
(Continued from the meet!ng of 9/14/93)
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to continue
this item to the meeting of October 12, 1993.
CCMIN09128/93 -12- 10/O6/i3
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
The motion was unanimously carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall,
Muftoz
None
None
SEPTEMBER 28. 1993
Parks, Roberts, Stone,
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
None
CITY MANAGER REPORT
None
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
None
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Stone to adjourn at
10:00 P.M.
The next regular meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on Tuesday, October 12,
1993, 7:00 PM, at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula,
California.
ATTEST:
Mayor J. Sal Mur~oz
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CCMIN09128193 -13- 10/05/93
ITEM
NO. 3
RESOL~ON NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AtJ~)WING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET
FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMP_~ULA
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
DOES RESOLVE,
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been
audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of
$942,839.41.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTEn, this 261h day of October, 1993.
ATFEST:
J. Sal Mufioz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Resos 335 I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 93- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 26th day of October, 1993 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 0
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R~sos 335 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
10/07/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
10/14/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
10126/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN;
10/07/93 TOTAL PAYROLL:
$127,70~.01
$60,876.32
$646,888.91
$105,364.17
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 10/28/93 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001 GENERAL
1 O0 GAS TAX
1 65 RDA-LOW/MODERATE
190 TCSD :
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP)
250 TCSD~Z;IP
280 RDA-CIP
~ SELF-INSURANCE
VEHICLES
320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS
330 COPY CENTER
340 FACILITIES
380 TCSD DEBT SERVICE
PAYROLL:
001
1 O0
190
191
193
300
320
330
GENERAL (PAYROLL)
GAS TAX (PAYROLL)
TCSD (PAYROLL)
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A (PAYROLL)
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C (PAYROLL)
SELF-INSURANCE (PAYROLL)
INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PAYROLL)
COPY CENTER (PAYROLL)
TOTAL BY FUND:
$161,258.77
$81,812.81
$4,002.20
$53,466.95
$4,871.70
$12,758.23
$43,507.58
$435,1 81.00
$19,674.37
$10,378.38
$1,879.46
$17~373.83
$8,021.55
$943.79
$2,544.62
$66,453.16
$17,371.82
$16,179.79
$433.27
$1,715.08
$539.61
$1,208.26
$1,465.18
$942,839.41
$837,475.24
$105,364.17
$942,830.41
R~/~,ED BY KARMA MCINTY~//fC/ Z~ REBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
V(XJCHRE2
10/07/93
11:16
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
'*--~I
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 CONINNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL INPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY -
300 INSURANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FUND
320 INFORHATION SYSTEMS
330 COPY CENTER FUND
.~r~O FACILITIES
TOTAL
ANOUNT
57,168,33
13,692.53
19,210.89
4,069.02
1,670.76
820.00
13,711.67
6,867.86
67,35
8,888.29
1,329.77
252.56
127,709.01
VOUCHRE2
lo/,,""'
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
12138
12193
12194
12195
12196
12197
12197
12197
12197
12197
12197
12197
12197
12198
12200
12200
12200
12201
12201
12201
12201
12202
12202
12203
12203
12203
12203
12203
12203
12204
12205
12206
12206
12~~-
11:16
CHECK
DATE
09/30/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
001159
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000128
0001~
000129
000131
000131
000131
000132
000132
000132
000132
000138
000138
000140
000140
000140
000140
000140
000140
000146
000155
000156
000156
000156
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
ANERIC. AN CONCRETE
H.L. MASONRY BUILDERS,
RUSSELL, CURT
HEWLETT, SCOTT
AVP VISION PLANS
AVP VISION PLANS
AVP VISION PLANS
AVP VISION PLANS
AVP VISION PLANS
AVP VISION PLANS
AVP VISION PLANS
AVP VISION PLANS
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES,
CAL WEST RENTAL CENTER
CAL WEST RENTAL CENTER
CARL WARREN & CO.
CARL WARREN & CO.
CARL WARREN & CO.
CASH REGISTER SYSTEMS
CASH REGISTER SYSTEMS
CASH REGISTER SYSTEMS
CASH REGISTER SYSTEMS
CITICORP MONTH AMERICA
CITICORP NORTH AMERICA
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COUNTS UNLIMITED
DAVLIN
DENTICARE OF CALIFORN]A
DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA
DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
~RKSHP/OCT 4-8/POLICE
REFUND/AMERICAN CONORET
REFOND/H.L. MASONRY
REFUND/RUSSELL
REFUND/HEWLETT
OCT 93 PREMIUI!
OCT 93 PREMIUM
OCT 93 PREMIUM
OCT 93 PREMIUM
OCT 93 PREMIUM
OCT 93 PREMIUM
OCT 93 PREMIUM
OCT 93 PREMIUM
RENEWAL/AUTO
RENTAL EOUIP
RENTAL EQUIP
LAKE VILLAGE/2/01/91
PERAZZO/7/08/92
GAGNON/l/07/93
~013; REGISTER TAPE; 4
R4190; RIBBON CARTRIDGE
FREIGHT
TAX
OCT. PAYMENT
OCT. PAYMENT
OCTOBER PREMIUM
OCTOBER PREMIUM
OCTOBER PREMIUM
OCTOBER PREMIUM
OCTOBER PREMIUM
OCTOBER PREMIUM
TRAFFIC CENSUS PROGRAM
VIDEO/AUDIO TAPE
OCTOBER PREMIUM
OCTOBER PREMIUM
OCTOBER PREMIUM
ACCOUNT
NLINBER
001-170-999-5261
001 - 199-4053
001-199-4056
190-183-4982
001-2660
001-2310
100-2310
190-2310
191-2310
193-2310
330-2310
001-1180
300-2310
300-199-999-5201
190-180-999-5238
190-180-999-5238
30o-199-999-5zo5
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
320-2800
320-199-999-5391
001-2330
100-2330
190-2330
191-2330
193-2330
330-2330
100-164-999-5406
001-100-999-5250
001-23~0
100-23~0
001-150-999-5250
ITEM
AMOUNT
353.00
5.00
35.00
30.00
62.50
399.09
143.07
97.15
4.14
5.06
31.50
24.95
3.96
5,915.75
38.79
68.19
309.50
60.53
137.88
37.00
20.0O
4.42
7.89
333.87
1,093.70
130.75
9.75
132.00
11.48
14.02
45. O0
600.00
700.00
29.86
14.93
15.00
PAGE I
CHECK
AI4OUNT.
353.00
5.OD
35.00
30.00
62.5O
708.90
5,915.75
106.98
507.91
69.31
1,427.57
343.00
600.00
700,00
59.79
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA
10/07/93 11:16 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOB ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOB VENDOB ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
12207 10/07/93 000162 EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTHA NET PORT BASE T
320-199-999-5221
412.69
412.69
12208 10/07193 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT NISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
12208 10/07/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT TS-9327 48"X72" BULLETI
12208 10/0719~ 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT TAX
12208 10/07/93 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT M]SC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
001-140-999-5220
190-180-999-5242
190-180-~9-5242
001-140-999-5220
16.11
295.00
22.86
170.90
504.87
12209 10/07/93 000184 GTE 909-694-1989 320-199-999-5208
12209 10/07/93 000184 GTE 909-695-3539 320-19~-~9-5208
12209 10/07/93 00018~ GTE 909-699-0128 320-199-~-5208
12209 10/07/93 000184 GTE 909-699-2309 320-199-999-5208
12209 10107193 00018~ GTE 909-699-8632 320-199-;-5208
2,353.12
22.82
215.30
23.33
17.64
2,632.21
12210 10/07193 000186 HANKS HARDgARE M[SC. SMALL TOOLS & EQU 360-199-999-5242
12210 10/07/93 000186 HANKS HARDgARE MiSC, SUPPLIES 1gO-183-g99-5380
12211 10/07/93 000194 ICNA RETIREMENT 00019~ DEF CONP 001-2080
12211 10/07/93 000194 IC~A RETIREMENT 00019~ DEF COMP 100-2080
lZ211 10/07/93 000194 ICNA RETIREMENT 000194 DEF CONP 190-2080
12211 10/07/93 000194 ICNA RETIREMENT 000194 DEF COHP 191-2080
12211 10/07/93 0O0194 ]CHA RETIREMENT 000194 DEF COI4P 193-2080
12211 10/07/93 000194 ICNA RETIREMENT 000194 DEF COHP 300-2080
12211 10/07/93 000194 ICHA RETIREMENT 000194 DEF COBP 330-2080
43.42
53.80
2,166.01
564.16
496.96
34.08
41.66
25.36
50.00
3,
97.22
12212 10/07/93 000201 JENNACO JANITOBIAL/SEPT 190-181-~-5212
400.00
400.00
12213 10107193 000205 KIDS PARTIES, ETC. ENTERTAINMENT MOHHY ME 190-18)-999-5)30
25.00
25.00
12214 10/07/93 000207 KLEINFELDER 6/18-7/16 001-1360 500,00
500.00
12215 10/07/93 000209 L & N FERTILIZER
WEED EATER SUPPLIES 100-164-999-5218
135.54
135.54
12216 10/07193 000213 LOCAL GOVERNMENT CONHIS OCT 22/RP
001-100-999-5260
30.00
30.00
12217 10/07/93 000226
12217 10/07/93 000226
12217 10/07/93 000226
12217 10/07/93 000226
12217 10/07/93 000226
12217 10/07/93 000226
MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT
MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT
MICRO AGE CQHPUTER CENT
MICRO AGE COHPUTER CENT
MICRO AGE COHPUTER CENT
MICRO AGE COBPUTER CENT
SCS] CABLE CENTSOP/CENT 320-199-999-5221
TAX 320-199-999-5221
INTEL SATISFAXT!ON NODE 320-199-999-5221
TAX 320-199-999-5221
gORDPERFECT 6.0 UPGRADE 320-199-999-5221
TAX 320-199-999-5221
60. O0
4.65
429. O0
33.25
7.68
633.58
12218 10/07/93 000238
12218 10/07/93 000238
12219 10/07/93 000245
12219 10/07/93 000245
12219 10/07/93 000245
12219 10/07/93 000245
12219 10/07/93 000245
12219 10/07/9) 000245
12219 10/07/93 000245
FINAL TOUCH MARKETING
FINAL TOUCH HARKETING
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM
PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR.PREM
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM
PERS (HEALTH IMSUR.PREM
HARKETING PROGRAM COBTR
MARKETING PROGRAM COBTR
280-199-999-5264
280-199-999-5264
OCTOBER PREMIUM 001-2090
OCT08ER PREMIUM 100-2090
OCTOBER PREMIUM 190-2090
OCTOBER PREMIUH 191-2090
OCTOBER PREMIUH 193-2090
OCTODER PREMIUH 300-2090
OCTOBER PREMIUH 330-2090
11,045.00
2,666.67
13,658.09
3,837.04
3,721.68
135.95
469.74
143.88
725.04
13,711.67
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
10/0r''' 11:16 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VEMDOR VENDOR /TEN ACCOUNT
NUP, BER DATE NUMBER NAHE DESCRIPTION NUMBER
[TEN CHECK
ANi~NT AMOUNT
12219 10/07/93 000265 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN OCTOBER PREMIUM
001-150-999-5250
112.89 22,804.31
12220 10107193 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 0002/,6 PER REDE 001-2130
12220 10107/g3 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000266 PER REDE 100-2130
12220 10107/~3 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 001-23~0
12220 101071~3 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000266 PERS RET 100-2390
12220 1010719~ 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 190-2390
12220 101071~3 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 191-2390
12220 10107193 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 PERS RET 19'5-2390
12220 10107193 000246 PERS EHPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 300-2390
12220 10/07/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 320-2390
12220 10/07/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 PERS RET 330-2390
12220 10/07/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REM 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390
12220 10/07/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REM 000246 SURVIVOR 100-2390
12220 10/07/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVXVOR 190-2390
12220 10/07/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETiREM 000246 SURVIVO~ 191'23~0
12220 10/07/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390
12220 10/07/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390
12220 10/07/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390
12220 10/07/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390
122'~'' 10/07/93 000248 PETROLANE FUEL TCSD 190-180-999-5263
12~ 10/07/93 000248 PETROLANE FUEL TCSO 190-180-999-5263
107.35
107.35
11,147.19
2,670.99
2,166.50
75.77
27~. 14
94.20
232.35
224.03
58.24
12.54
12.09
1.4z.
.93
1.86
46.13
99.37
17,192.85
145.50
12222 10/07/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070
12222 10107/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028;3 FEDERAL 100-2070
12222 10/07/93 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070
12222 10/07/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 191-2070
12222 10/07/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028~ FEDERAL 193-2070
12222 10/07/93 00028:3 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070
12222 10/07/93 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028S FEDERAL 320-2070
12222 10/07/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070
12222 10/07/93 000283 FIRSTAX (]RS) 000283 MEDICARE 001-2070
12222 10/07/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 100-2070
12222 10/07/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 190-2070
12222 10/07/93 00028~ FIRSTAX (]RS) 000283 MEDICARE' 191-2070
12222 10/07/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 193-2070
12222 10/07/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 300-2070
12222 10/07/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 320-2070
12222 10/07/93 000283 FIRSTAX (]RS) 000283 MEDICARE 330-2070
10,075.31
2,936.77
2,319.91
84.56
249.53
84.50
247.11
81.78
2,357.43
628.59
570,62
16.08
60°08
19.26
45.02
46.50
19,823.03
12223 10107193 000285 SIR SPEEDY 500/BUSINESS CARDS; GRA 001-150-99~-5220
12223 10/07/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY 500/BUSINESS CARDS; LUC 001-140-999-5220
12223 10/07/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY TAX 001-140-999-5220
12223 10/07/93 000285 SiR SPEEDY TAX 001-150-9'9-5220
36, O0
36.00
2.79
2.79
77.58
12224 10/07/93 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T REPAIR & MAINT. CITY VE 310-180-999-5214
67.35
67.35
12225 10107193 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY PLAQUES FOR SENIOR CENT 190-180-999-5301 186.92
12Z,~-- 10/07/93 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY TAX 190-180-999-5301 14.49 201.41
VOUCHRE2 CiTY OF TENECULA
10107193 11: 16 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEN
NUNBER DATE NUIqBER NNqE DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUIIER
ITEM
ANOUNT
CHECK
ANOUNT
12226 10107/93 000322 UN]GLOBE BUTTERFIELD TR NOV 18-20 NUNOZ
001 - 1 O0 - 9O9- 5258
~9.00
12227 10107193 000325 UN]TED HAY OF THE iHLAN 000325 LIt/
12227 10107193 000325 UNITED VAY OF THE INLAN 000325
001-2120
190-2120
87.00
17.50
104.50
12228 10107/93 0003~0 WHITE CAP
12228 10107/93 0003~0 MHITE CAP
RAIN BOOTS FOR NEi/CREIJ 100-164-999-5242
TAX 100-164-999-5242
21.45
1.1
12229 10/07/q3 000348 Z[GLER, GAIL
REFRESHNENTS/SR. CENTER 190-181-999-5301
262.50
262.50
12230 10/07/93 000350 ELNO, ANTHONY ]CBO 9/12-9/16 TE 001-162-~-5258
373
373.68
12231 10107/93 000374
12231 10/07/93 000374
12231 10107/93 000374
12231 10/07/93 000374
12231 10/07/93 000374
SOUTHERN CALIF ED]SOR
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CAL[F EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
8/26-9/27 191-180-999-5319
8/26-9/27 191-180-999-5240
8/26-9/2? 190-182-999-5240
8/26-9/27 19O-180-99O-5240
8/26-9/2? 193-180-999-5240
2,67'9.15
959.96
500.7~
3,916.35
424.08
8,480.26
12232 10/07/93 000389
12232 10/07/93 000389
122~Z 10/07/93 000389
122~3 10/07/93 000403
USCH/PEBSCO, COBRA) 000]89 PT RETIR
USCM/PEBSCO, COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
USCH/PEBSCO, (OBRA) 000389 PT RET]R
SHAI.IN SCOTT POOL & SPA
POOL SERVICE & HA]NTENA
001-2160
100-2160
190-2160
190-180-~-5212
17.28
96.00
264.18
162.00
377.46
~o
12234 10/07/93 000430
12234 10/07/93 000430
12234 10/07/93 000430
GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA OCTOBER PREMIUIq
GROUP AMER]CA- VOLUNTA OCTOBER PREMIUH
GROUP ANERICA - VOLUNTA OCTOBER PRENZUN
001-2510
100-2510
190-2510
256.70
22.80
89.0O
368.50
12235 10/07/93 000~31
12235 10107193 000~31
12235 10107/93 000~31
12235 10/07/93 000431
12235 10107193 000431
12235 10107193 000/,31
12235 10/07/93 000431
12235 10/07/93 000431
12235 10/07/93 000431
12236 10/07/93 000~4
12236 10/07/93 00044~
12236 10107193 000444
12236 10/07/93 000~4
12236 10/07/93 0004~
12236 10/07/93 000444
122.$6 10/07/93 0004~4
12236 10/07/93 00042~,
12236 10/07/93 000444
12236 10/07/93 000444
12236 10/07/93 000/~4~
12236 10/07/93 O01)/~r~
12236 10/07/93 00042~
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, OCTOBER PRENIUN
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, OCTOBER PRENIUN
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, OCTOBER PREN[UN
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, OCTOBER PRENIUN
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, OCTOBER PRENIUN
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, OCTOBER PRENIUN
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, OCTOBER PRENIUH
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, OCTOBER PRENIIJH
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, OCTOBER PRENIUIq
FIRSTAX CEDD) OOO~ SDI
FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~ SDI
FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI
FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004.~ SD]
FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004/,4 SD]
FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~, SD]
FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI
FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004,44 ~l
FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE
FIRSTAX (EDD) 0OO444 STATE
FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~44 STATE
FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~ STATE
FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE
001-2.~0
100-2340
19O-2340
191-?,~0
1~]-2~0
300-2340
330-2340
001-1180
001-150-999-5250
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
001-2070
100-2070
19O-2070
191-2070
1B-2070
605.33
170.61
130.00
7.31
8.94
4.06
32.50
48.73
15.00
534.02
172.10
186.50
7.21
26.93
2.81
20.18
20.85
2,492.73
714.72
508.83
21
49.89
1,022.50
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
10/0/-` 11:16 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR [TEN ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NIJMBER MANE DESCRIPTION NLNBER
[TEN
AMOUNT
CHECK
AIeXINT
1223& 10/07/93 000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) ~ STATE 300"2070
1227,5 10107193 000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~ STATE 320-2070
122~6 10107/93 O00zF~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~ STATE 330-2070
26.81
56.45
12.78
12237 10/07/93 0002~6
12237 10/07/93 000446
12237 10/07/93 000446
VISION COMMUNICATIOR SE
VISION COMMJMICATION SE
VISION COMMUNICATION $E
ETE-160-2 16 BUTTON DIG 320-199-999-5242
FREIGHT 320-199-999-5242
TAX 320-199-999-5242
285.00
9.00
22.0~
316.09
12238 10/07/9'$ 000471 IGOE & COMPANY FLEX PLAN SEPT 001-150-~-5250
276. O0
276.00
12239 10/07193 000503 INFORMATION FOR PUBLIC YEARLY INSTALLMENT 320-199-999-5228
4~.50
484,50
12240 10/07/93 000526 U.C. REGENTS SAFETY TRAINING 001-1&~-9~-5261
200.00
200.00
12241 10107193 000548 KIPLINGER gASHINGTON ED 92590HNRN6
12241 10/07/93 000548 KIPLINGER WASHINGTON ED 92590NLSS0006
001-140-999-5228
1~0-180-~-5228
68.00
54.00
122.00
12242 10/07/93 00057'5 APOLLO S~EEPING. INC. S~EEPZNG ""EMERGENCY RES 100-164-999-5402
130.00
130.00
12243 10/07/93 000603 CABLE & WIRELESS COleeJN 8/16-9/15 320-199-999-5208
127"" 10/07/93 000642 CITY OF TENECULA - FLEX FLEXIBLE BENEFIT ACCOUN 001-1020
12. 10107/93 0006/,2 CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX FLEXIBLE BENEFIT ACCOUN 190-1020
1222~ 10/07/93 0006/,2 CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX FLEXIBLE BENEFIT ACCOUN 100-1020
12244 10107/93 0006~2 CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX FLEXIBLE BENEFIT ACCOUN 300-1020
12244 10/07/93 0006~2 CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX FLEXIBLE BENEFIT ACCOUN 330-1020
1,972.59
3,050.71
516.66
50.00
21.25
16.25
1,972.59
3,6%.87
12245 10/07/93 0006~3 FORTNER HARDWARE MISC. SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5212
37.83
37.83
12246 10/07/93 000731 NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP TRAINING MATERIALS 190-180-999-5258
12247 10/07/93 000751 SKILLPATH, INC.
11/01/936 IJRKSHP/BOSTRE 001-163-~9-5261
59.00
59.00
12248 10/07/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA OCTOBER PREMIUM 001-2360
12248 10/07/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA OCTONER PREMiUM 100-2360
12248 10/07/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA OCTOBER PREMIUM 190-2360
12248 10/07/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA OCTOBER PREMiUM 191-2360
12248 10/07/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA OCTOBER PREMIUM 193-2360
12268 10/07/93 000765 GROUP AMERiCA OCTOBER PREMIUM
12268 10/07/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA OCTOBER PREMIUM 320-2360
12248 10/07/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA OCTOBER PREMIUM 330-2360
12248 10/07/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA OCTOBER PREMIUM 001-2380
12248 10/07/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA OCTOBER PREMIUM 100-2380
12248 10/07/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA OCTOBER PREMIUM 190-2380
12248 10/07/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA OCTOBER PREMIUM 191-2380
12248 10/07/93 000765 GROUP AMER%CA OCTOBER PREMiUM 193-2380
12248 10107/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA OCTOBER PREMIUM 300-2380
12248 10/07/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA OCTOBER PREMIUM 320-2380
12248 10/07/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA OCTOBER PREMIUM 330-2380
12~~'- 10/07/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA OCTOBER PREMiUM 001-2500
12 10/07/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA OCTOBER PREMiUM 100-2500
560.50
128.25
133.00
4.28
14.72
4.75
9.50
19.00
920.99
226.78
194.67
5.89
20.91
7.76
18.67
18.59
49.45
VOUCHRE2
10/07/93
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
122A8
1224,8
122A8
122~8
12248
12248
122~9
12250
12251
12252
12253
12253
12253
12254
12255
12255
12255
12255
12255
12256
12257
12257
12258
12259
12259
12259
12259
12260
12261
12262
12263
12264
12265
11:16
CHECK
DATE
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10107193
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/9:5
10/07/93
10/07/9:5
10/07/9:5
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/9:5
10/07/9:5
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/93
10/07/9:5
10/07/9:5
10/07/9:5
VENDOR
NUMBER
000765
000765
000765
000765
000765
000765
000768
000853
000938
001022
001030
001030
001030
001064
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
001095
001125
001125
001135
001143
0011~3
001143
001143
001149
00115A
001155
001156
001157
001158
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR
NAME
]TEN
DESCRIPTION
GROUP AHER]CA
GROUP A~ERZCA
GROUP AMERICA
GROUP AHERZCA
GROUP AMERICA
GROUP AHER[CA
OCTO6ER PREMIUM
OCT(fliER PREMIUM
OCTOBER PRENILIN
OCTOBER PRENILIH
OCTOBER PREMILN
OCTOBER PREHZLIN
TIME SYSTEMS CALENDERS
QUINLAN PUBLISHING CO., gORKERS CONP BULLETIN
FOXBRIAR FARMS
80~ CONTRACT CLASS
THONPSOR PUBLISHING GRO
MINI-GRAPHIC SYSTEMS,
MINI-GRAPHIC SYSTEMS,
MINI-GRAPHIC SYSTEMS,
RENEU SUBSCRIPTION
MICROFICNE FILM
MICROFICHE FILM
MICROFICHE FILM
KEYE PROOUCTIVITY CENTE SEMINAR/NOV, 18/AT
USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065 DEF CONP
USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. COMP. 001065 DEF CONP
USCN/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP, 001065 DEF CONP
USCN/PEBSCO (DEF, COMP, 001065 DEF CONP
USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. COMP, 001065 DEF CONP
URBAN LOGIC CONSULTANTS PROF. SERV. JULY 29-SEP
DIGITAL TELECOMffiJNICATZ 1ST HR LABOR CHARGE
DIGITAL TELECONleJNICAT] ADDITIONAL LABOR RATE F
FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL
TEMEKU SPORTS
TEMEKU SPORTS
TENEK1J SPORTS
TEMEKU SPORTS
JUN[OB SIZE RUBBER FOOT
INTERMEDIATE SIZE RUBBE
PLACE KICKING TEES.
TAX
ASCE-CONTINUING EDUCATI SEMINAR/DEC 2-3, 1993
KATZ HOLLIS
RDA LEGISLATIVE CONF
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC SECTO PUBLICATIONS
SCPPOA MEMBERSHIP
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
1~0-2500
191-2500
193-2500
300-2500
320-2500
330-2500
190-180-999-5220
001-150-999-5228
190-183-999-5330
001-150-999-5228
001-120-999-5250
001-120-999-5250
001-120-999-5250
001-140-999-5261
001-2080
100-2080
190-2080
300-2080
320-2080
210-165-631-5802
190-181-999-5212
190-181-999-5212
001-150-999-5250
190-183-999-5380
190-183-999-5380
1gO-183-g99-5380
190-183-999-5380
001-163-999-5261
001-110-999-5258
340-199-999-5228
190-180-999-5226
ZTE BOOKSTORE PUBLICATIONS 001-163-999-5228
HOLIDAY INN
ASCE CONF./DEC. 2-3/DS
001-163-999-5261
[TEN
AMOUNT
42.82
1.30
4.60
1.71
4.11
10.75
59.99
160.00
216.00
31.38
238.04
58.72
125.00
3,179.49
247.98
256.32
3.A7
312.50
820,00
130.00
78,10
100,00
47.80
57.80
11.90
9.11
645.00
125.00
209,14
15.00
55.00
1~9.04
PAGE 6
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,5~.76
10.75
59.99
160.00
216.00
328.14
125.00
3,999.76
820.00
208.10
100,00
126,61
645.00
125.00
209.14
15.00
55.00
VOUCHRE2
IO/P"""
VOUCHER/
CHECK
HUMBER
12266
12267
11:16
CHECK
DATE
10/07/93
10/07/93
VENDOR
NUffiiER
001160
001162
VENDOR
NAME
PACTEL CELLULAR-LA
ON THE ROAD AGAIN TRAVE
CITY OF TEMEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
6015202
LAUGHLIN TRIP
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
320-199-999-5208
190-183-999-5350
ITEM
AMOUNT
62.26
5:~.00
PAGE 7
CHECK
AleOUNT
534.00
TOTAL CHECKS
127,70~.01
VOUCHRE2
10/14/9r3
12:24
CiTY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 COII4UNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL iNPROVEHENT PROJ FUND
250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD
280 REDEVELOP~ENT AGENCY - CIP
310 VEHICLES FUND
320 INFORNATION SYSTEHS
330 COPY CENTER FUND
7~0 FACiLiTIES
TOTAL
ANOUNT
24,793.16
7,305.66
9,161.35
622.68
Z,358.57
693.00
250,00
2,500.00
/,61.55
8,485.54
3,553.78
691.23
60,876.32
VOUCHRE2
10/1~'/''' lZ:24
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
12268 10/10/93 000957
12269 10/12/93 0004.88
12273 10/14/93
lZ274 10/14/93
12275 10/14/93
12276 10/14/93
12277 10/14/93
12278 10/14/93
12278 10/14/93
12279 10/14/93
12280 10/14/93
12ZP""' 10/14/93
12282 10/14/93
12283 10/14/93 000127
12284 10/14/93 000137
12284 10/14/93 000137
12284 10/14/93 000137
12284 10/14/93 000137
12285 10/14/93 000146
12286 10/14/93 000155
12287 10/14/93 000164
12288 10/14/93 000165
12288 10/14/93 000165
12288 10/14/93 000165
12289 10/14/93 000177
12289 10/14/93 000177
12289 10/14/93 000177
12289 10/14/93 000177
12289 10/14/93 000177
12289 10/14/93 000177
12289 10/14/93 000177
122/''''' 0/14/93 000186
VENDOR
NAME
TEMECULA VALLEY FILM
KNOTT'S BERRY FARM
ANERICANt/EST S[GN
GOOD LAND INVESTMENT
TEMECULA VALLEY POP ~
MIDNIGHT ROUND UP
A & E ELECTRICAL
PERUCHEITI, MICHAEL .
PERUCHEITI , MICHAEL
NCGAUGH, PAULA
JUNGLE RAGS
JSN DISTRIBUTING
KING SXGN CO.
CALIFORNIAN- LEGAL
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC,
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
COUNTS UNLIMITED
D AV L I N
ESGIL CORPORATION
FEDERAL EXPRESS
FEDERAL EXPRESS
FEDERAL EXPRESS
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
HANKS HARDMARE
C]TY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM ACCOUNT
DESCRIPTION NUMBER
1/2 OF PRODUCTION COSTS 280-199-999-5264
TEEN TRIP TO KNOTTS SCA
REFUND/AIqERZrJkNgEST SZG
REFUND/__m300__ LAND INVEST
REFUND/TEM VALLEY POP g
REFUND/MIDNIGHT ROUND U
REFUND/A&E ELECTRICAL
REFUND/PERUCHE[TI, N[CN
REFUND/PERUCHE[TI, NICH
REFUND/MCGAUGH
REFUND/JUNGLE RAGS
REFUND/JSM DISTRIBUTING
REFUND/KING SIGN
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN
JULY/AUGUST FUEL
JULY/AUGUST FUEL
JULY/AUGUST FUEL
JULY/AUGUST FUEL
TRAFFIC CENSUS PROGRAM
AUDIO TAPE; PLANNING
9/1-9/30 PLAN CHECK
NAIL/CN
ACCT NO 1339-1107-3
ACCT NO 1339-1107-3
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SU
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES;
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC. SUPPLIES
190-183-999-5350
001-161-4119
001-2650
001-161-4125
001-161-4119
001-161-4119
001-163-4105
001-163-4388
190-183-4982
001-161-4119
001-199-4056
001-161-4119
001-161-999-5256
001-110-~-5262
001-170-~-5262
100-164-~-5263
310-180-~9-5214
100-164-~-5406
001-161-~-5250
001-162-~-5248
001-110-~-5230
001-120-~-5230
001-140-999-5230
001-110-~-5220
001-162-~-5220
001-161-~-5220
001-161-~-5220
001-140-~-5220
190-180-~-5220
190-180-~-5220
190-180-~-5212
I T EM
N~UNT
2,500.00
405.00
160.00
19.00
63.00
160.00
160.00
758.00
154.00
36. O0
60. O0
35.00
160,00
258.18
120,80
75.19
13.08
356.53
2,530.00
150.00
413.45
9.50
27.00
10.00
14.08
37.15
7.03
93.93
20.17
140.~;
122.19-
36.07
**
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,500.00
405.00
160.00
19.00
63.00
160.00
160.00
912,00
60.00
35.00
160.00
258.18
565.60
2,530.00
150.00
413.45
46.50
191.16
~6.07
VOUCHRE2 CiTY OF TENECULA
10/14/93 12:24 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ]TEN ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCR]PT]ON NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
12291 10/14/93 000193 ICMA STRATEGIC PLANNING BOOK 001-161-999-5228
25.45
25.45
12292 10/14/93 000195 ASCON HASLER NAILING SY METER RENTAL & RESETS 3:30-199-999-5239
242.25
242.25
12293 10/14/93 000204 J.R. FREEMAN CO, INC. MAINTENANCE ON CITY HAL 340-199-999-5212
35.00
35.00
12294 10/14/93 000206 KINKO'S COPIES
12294 10/14/93 000206 KINKO,S COPIES
12294 10/14/93 000206 KINKO'S COPIES
12294 10/14/93 000206 KINKO'S COPIES
MISC. PRINTING SERVICES 330-199-999-5220
NISC. PRINTING SERVICES 330-199-999-5220
PAPER 190-180-999-5220
PAPER 001-162-999-5220
17.35
6.36
60.02
2.15
12295 10/14/93 000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING OPEN P.O. CC DINNERS 001-100-999-5260
108.00
108.00
12296 10/14/93 000226
12296 10/14/93 000226
12296 10/14/93 000226
MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT
MICRO AGE CDNPUTER CENT
MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT
MORDPERFECT 6.0 20 USER 320-1980
MORDPERFECT 6.0 FOR DOS 320-1980
TAX 320-1980
2,23~.00
3,640.00
455.24
6,329.24
12297 10/14/93 000248 PETROLANE
12297 10/14/93 000248 PETROLANE
12297 10/14/93 O002/+B PETROLANE
FUEL/B&S 001-162-999-5263
FUEL/B&S 001-162-999-5263
OIL FILTERS 310-162-999-5214
247.97
227.88
63.04
538.89
12298 10/14/93 000249 PETTY CASH
12298 10/14/93 000249 PETTY CASH
12298 10/14/93 000249 PETTY CASH
12298 10/14/93 000249 PETTY CASH
12298 10/14/93 000249 PETTY CASH
12298 10/14/93 000249 PETTY CASH
12298 10/14/93 000249 PETTY CASH
12298 10/14/93 000249 PETTY CASH
12298 10/14/93 000249 PETTY CASH
12298 10/14/93 000249 PETTY CASH
12298 10/14/93 000249 PETTY CASH
12298 10/14/93 000249 PETTY CASH
12298 10/14/93 000249 PETTY CASH
12298 10/14/93 000249 PETTY CASH
12298 10/14/93 000249 PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH 001-163-999-5224
PETTY CASH 001-140-999-5260
PETTY CASH 001-163-999-5220
PETTY CASH 00~-100-999-5258
PETTY CASH 001-140-999-5220
PETTY CASH 001-140-999-5220
PETTY CASH 001-161-999-5261
PETTY CASH 001-140-999-5258
PETTY CASH 001-110-999-5261
PETTY CASH 001-100-999-5228
PETTY CASH 190-183-999-5320
PETTY CASH 190-18~-999-5320
PETTY CASH 190-181-999-5301
PETTY CASH 190-180-999-5260
PETTY CASH 190-180-999-5220
3.00
6.16
7.26
22.73
8.62
4.31
9.00
2.83
33.51
15.00
22.19
26.26
42.29
34.87
4.31
242.34
12299 10/14/93 000253 POSTMASTER
12299 10/14/93 000253 POSTMASTER
NAIL/PLANNING
NAIL/PM
001-161-999-5230
001-163-999-5230
9.95
13.95
Z3,90
12300 10/14/93 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE
12300 10/14/93 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE
ADVERTISING
JOB ANNOUNCEMENT
001-161-999-5256
001-150-999-5254
246.8~
12301 10/14/93 000262 RANCHO MATER
12301 10/14/93 000262 RANCHO MATER
12301 10/14/93 000262 RANCHO MATER
12301 10/14/93 000262 RANCHO MATER
8/10-9/08
08/06/93-9/10/93
08/06/93-9/10/93
08/06/93-9/10/93
190-181-999-5240
190-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
191-180-999-5240
9.61
2,906.98
1,890.84
153.94
4,961.37
12302 10/14/93 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T REPAIR & NAINT. CITY VE 310-162-999-5214 20.99
12302 10/14/93 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T REPAIR & MAINT. CITY VE 310-162-999-5214 20.99
VOUCHRE2
10/lr"' 12:24
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOg ALL PER]ODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOg'
NtIIBER DATE NU!IER
VENDOg
NAME
ITEM
DESCRZPTIOg
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AIqOUNT
CHECK
ANOUNT
12303 10/14/93 000294
12303 10/14/93 000294
12303 10/14/93 000294
12303 10/14/93 000294
12303 10/14/93 000294
12303 10/14/93 000294
1Z303 10/14/93 000294
12303 10/14/93 000294
STATE COMPENSATION INS.
STATE COMPENSATION INS.
STATE COMPENSATION INS,
STATE COMPENSATION INS,
STATE COMPENSATION INS,
STATE COMPENSATION INS,
STATE COMPENSATION INS,
STATE COMPENSATION INS,
OCT 93 M3RKERS' CORP
OCT 93 gORKERS' CONP
OCT 93 gORKERS' CONP
OCT 93 gORICER$' CCNP
OCT 93 gORKERS' CONP
OCT 93 MORKERS' CONP
OCT 93 MORKER$' COMP
OCT 95 MORk'ERS' COMP
001-2370
100-2370
1~0-2370
191-2370
193-2370
320-2370
330-2370
001-1182
8,866.72
4,013,40
2,~3.05
403.73
177.05
220.53
317.87
127.37
17,119.72
12304 10/14/93 000302
12304 10/14/93 000302
12304 10/14/93 000302
12304 10/14/93 000302
12304 10/14/93 000302
12304 10/14/93 000302
12305 10/14/93 000306
SYSTEM SOURCE
SYSTEM SOURCE
SYSTEM SOURCE
SYSTEM SOURCE
SYSTEM SOURCE
SYSTEM SOURCE
TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE
LOADBAR MALL BRACKET
FRE]GHT
TAX
#20 gHITE; TOUCH UP PAI
FREIGHT
TAX
MZSC SUPPLIES
001 - 161 -~99-5242
001-161 -~-5242
001 - 161 -~-5242
340-199-~-5242
340-1~9-~-5242
3/,0-199-999-5242
1~0-180-999-5212
20.00
2.97
1.78
20. O0
5.00
1.94
232. O3
51
232.03
12306 10/14/93 000307
12306 10/14/93 000307
12306 10/14/93 000307
123"' 10/14/93 000307
\
12307 10/14/93 000320
12307 10/14/93 000320
TEMECULA TROPHY
TEMECULA TROPHY
TEMECULA TROPHY
TEMECULA TROPHY
TOI~N CENTER STATIONERS
TOUN CENTER STATIONERS
TROPHIES
DARK OAK 6' FLAG POLE
EAGLE ADOgNNENT
TAX
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
190-182-~-5301
001-100-999-5258
001-100-q99-5258
001-100-~99-5258
190-180-~-5220
190-180-~-5220
25.86
60.00
20.00
6.20
117.~
112.06
162.08
12308 10/14/93 000326
12308 10/14/93 000326
12308 10/14/93 000326
12308 10/14/93 000326
12308 10/14/93 000326
12308 10/14/93 000326
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
2 SETS OF UNIFORMS CLEA 100-164-~-5243
2 SETS OF UNIFORMS CLEA 100-164-999-5243
2 SETS OF UNIFOgNS CLEA 100-164-~-5243
UNIFOgM RENTAL 190-180-~99-5243
UNIFORM RENTAL 190-180-999-5243
FLOOR HAT SERVICES; CIT 340-199-999-5250
203.65
23.00
23.00
13.60
13.60
34.50
311.35
12309 10/14/93 000340 WHITE CAP MlSC. SUPPLIES 100-164-~-5242
12309 10/14/93 000340 gHITE CAP RAIN BOUTS FOR MEg CREg 100-164-999-5242
12309 10/14/93 000340 gHITE CAP TAX 100-164-999-5242
51.05
15
5.20
72.2~
12310 10/14/93 000345 XEROX CORPORATION SILL] LEASE AGREEMENT; 5100 C 330-199-999-5239
2,969.95
12311 10/14/93 000348 ZIGLER, rAIL
REFRESHMENTS/STAFF 001-140-91~-5260
113.7'5
!13.75
12312 10/14/93 000358 DIXON, DAVID F.
MESCON TRADE SHg/SEPT. 001-110-999-5258
107.55
107.55
12313 10/14/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR INSTALLATION
001-110-F}9-5208
50.00
50.00
12314 10/14/93 000423 H & H CRAFT & FLOgAL SU SUPPLIES 190-181-999-5301
106.20
106.20
12315 10/14/93 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL JANITOgIAL SUPPLIES;CZT 340-1~9-~-5212
12315 10/14/93 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL JANITOgIAL SUPPLIES;CZT 340-199-999-5212
12~ 10/14/93 000428 HORIZON MATER MATER CHG/CUPS 190-182-999-5240
240.06
230.87
58.60
470
58.60
VOUCHRE2
10/14/93
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
12317
12317
12318
12319
12319
12320
123Z0
12321
12322
12324
12325
12326
12327
12328
12328
12329
12330
12331
12332
12333
12333
12333
12333
12334
12334
12334
1233/,
1233/*
12335
CHECK
DATE
10/14/93
10/14/93
10/14/93
10/14/93
10/14/93
10/14/93
10/14/93
10/14/~J
10/14/9n~
10/14/93
10/14/93
10/14/93
10/14/93
10/14/93
10/14/93
10/14/93
10/14/93
10/14/93
10/14/93
10/14/93
10/14/93
10/14/93
10/14/93
10/14/93
10/14/93
10/14/93
10/14/93
10/14/93
10/14/93
10/14/93
10/14/93
CiTY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NU!eER MARE DESCRIPTION
00047~ SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS PROGRAIIIING ASSISTANCE
000/,34 SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS INSTALLATION ASSISTANCE
000474 ARBOR-PRO TREE SERVICE REMOVE & STUMP GRIND ON
000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDi 08/31-09/30/93
000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDi 08/31-09/30/93
000574 SUPER TONER HP-II-III LASERJET TONE
000574 SUPER TONER TAX
000587 NUNOZ, NARIO
JANITORIAL SERVICES
000597
000602
CALIFORNIA WATER RESOUR ANNUAL FEE FOR WASTE DI
DEAM~S PHOTO FILM AND FILM PROCESSIN
0006/~ ASCE
000644 ASCE
1994 MEMBERSHIP/HARVEY
199/, MEMBERSHIP/SERLET
000653 LUCKY STORE
SUPPLY FOR COOKIE le3NST
000730 EDVALSON, HARI~30D
BASIC ECONOMIC 9/12-9/1
000747 APA/PLANNERS BOOKSTORE LOCAL GOVERNMENT PLANN!
000843 McDANIEL ENGINEERING CO BRIDGE ANATENENT DESIGN
0008~3 McDANIEL ENGINEERING CO CREDIT MEHO/EXCEED PO
000854 URBAN LAND INSTITUTE MEMBERSHIP FOR UL]
000873 ROBERTS, RONALD H. WESCON/SEPT 29-30/RR
000878 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB REIMB FOR DISBURSEMENTS
000887 PRECISION PHOTOGRAPHY, REFUND/OVERPAYMENT
000980 COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY RB 240 PCC WIRE CONNECT
000980 COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY TAX
000980 COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
000980 COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
000981 R.H.F. INC REPAIRS
000981 R.H,F. INC REPAIR & RECERTIFICATIO
000~81 R.H.F. INC PARTS
000981 R,H,F, INC LABOR
000981 R.H.F, INC FREIGHT
000981 R,H.F, INC TAX
000993 FREEDOM COFFEE, INC, COFFEE SERVICE; CITY HA
ACCOUNT
NUllER
320-199-999-5250
320-19~-999-5250
100-16~-999-5402
191-180-~-5319
191-180-999-5319
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
190-181-99~-5250
250-190-129-5802
001-162-999-5250
001-16.$-999-5226
001-16.~-999-5226
190-18~-999-5320
001-110-999-5261
001-161-999-5228
210-166-627-5804
210-166-627-5804
001-161-~-5226
001-100-~-5258
001-1500
001-161-4119
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
001-170-999-5215
001-170-999-5215
001-170-999-5215
001-170-999-5215
001-170-999-5215
001-170-999-5215
340-199-999-5250
ITEM
NeOUNT
377.77
374.00
325.00
33.83
31.18
450.00
34.88
150.00
250.00
19.10
150.00
150.00
50.00
19.00
45.95
799.50
106.50-
140.00
18.97
9,257.45
160.00
424.93
3Z.93
9.16
178.69
96.42
35.00
7.85
45.00
8.00
.57
123.86
PAGE 4
CHECK
ANOUMT
731.77
325.00
65.01
484.88
150.00
250.00
19.10
300.00
50.00
~0
45.95
693.00
140.00
18.97
9,257.45
160,00
645.71
192.84
VOUCHRE2
10/+,.""'
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
12336
12337
12337
12337
12337
12337
12337
12337
12337
12337
12338
12339
12~0
12361
12362
127"
12363
12363
12366
12345
12346
12347
12348
12349
12350
12351
12352
12:24
CHECK
DATE
10/16/93
10/16/93
10/16/93
10/16/93
10/16/93
10/16/93
10/16/93
10/16/93
10/16/93
10/16/93
10/16/93
10/16/93
10/16/93
10/14/93
10/16/93
10/16/93
10/16/93
10/16/93
10/16/93
10/14/93
10/16/93
10/14/93
10/16/93
10/14/93
10/16/93
10/16/93
10/14/93
VENDOR
NUMBER
001016
001029
001029
001029
001029
001029
001029
001029
001029
001029
0010/,6
001057
001076
001122
001123
001123
001128
001128
001165
001167
001169
001171
001173
001174
001175
001176
001177
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VE~OR /TEN
NAME DESCRIPTION
COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS REFUND/REDUCED FEES
DATA QUICK CD-RON RIVERSIDE (CARl)
DATA QUICK FREIGHT
DATA QU/CK TAX
DATA QUICK ACCOUNT ESTABLISHHEHT F
DATA QUICK DATAQUICK INFORI4ATIGN S
DATA QUICK TAX
DATA QUICK DATAQUICK INFORMATIOR S
DATA QUICK FREIGHT
DATA QUICK TAX
REXON, FREEDMAN, KLEPET LEGAL SERVICES
PRO"SCAPE# INC,
TUO MONTHS LANDSCAPE HA
MESTERN gASTE
RENTAL/TO/LETS
SCOTCH PAINT CORPORATIO 5 GALLOR RECYCLE PAINT
KNOX INDUSTRIAL $UPPLIE SHALL HAND TOOLS FOR ST
KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE TAX
VOLUME SERVICES CITY PICNIC
VOLUME SERVICES CITY PICNIC
ENTERTAINMENT PUBLICATI REIMB FOR TEEN FUNDRAIS
INFORHATION REQUIREMENT CITY CLERK HANUAL
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CLERK COPIES OF BONDS
ORIENTAL TRADING CO, SUPPLIES FOR HALLOMIEEN
CARNEGIE COUNCIL OR ADO A HATTER OF TIME PUBLIC
CPRS AGING SECTION CPRS CONF. NOV.11-16 IR
U.S. GOV'T PRINTING OFF TOGETHER ME CAN GUIDE
A & A SIGNS
REFUND/A&A SIGNS
AEP MEMBERSH/P/DU
TOTAL CHECKS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-161-6119
320- lf~-~-5250
320-1~-~-5250
320- I W- ~- 5250
320-1W-~-5250
320-1~-~-5250
320-1W-~-5250
320-1~-~-5250
320-1~44~-5250
320- lW-~-5250
001-130-~-5267
193-180-~-5615
1~0-180-~-5238
100-164-~-5218
100-164-~-5262
100-164-~-5262
001 - 150-~-5265
001-2172
190-183-~-5320
001 - 120-~-5228
001 - 120-~-5230
190-183-~-5370
1~0-180-~-5228
190 - 180- ~- 5228
190-180-~-5228
001-161-6119
001 - 161-999- 5226
ITEM
AMOUNT
320.00
250.00
10.00
19.38
250.00
7'0.00
5.63
7'0.00
18.88
5.63
609.05
290.&8
655.00
69.19
30.53
2.37
26.68
2/,6.00
260.00
70.50
11.20
295.22
13.00
94.00
11.00
160.00
60.00
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
320.00
6~. 12
609.05
290.68
455.00
69.19
32.90
272.68
240.00
7'0°50
11.20
2f5.22
13.00
W,.O0
11,00
160,00
60, O0
60,876.32
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 6
10/14/93 14:53 ~
CITY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOI.//NOO SET ASIDE
190 CONNUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL ]NPROVENENT PROJ FUND
250 CAPITAL PROJECTS -
280 REDEVELOPIqENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FUND
330 COPY CENTER FUND
~80 RDA - DEBT SERVICE
TOTAL
ANOUNT
79,317.28
40,814.82
4,002.20
25,0~.71
8,728.92
41,~9~.58
63~,931.00
3,/,62.70
3,510.52
1,350.56
3,138.00
2,5~.62
64.8,889.91
VOUCHRE2
10/1/''~ 16:53
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERICX)S
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR VENIX)R ITEM ACCOUNT
NU!iER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
12356 10/26/93
BUTLER, MICHAEL
REFUND/BUTLER MICHAEL 001-2650
2,600.00
2,600.00
12357 10126/93
MESTERN HENEX CONPORATI BOND RELEASE/MESTERN HE 001-2650
2,100.00
2,100.00
12358 10/26/93
12358 10/26/93
12358 10/26/93
12358 10/26/93
12358 10/26/93
12358 10/26/93
12358 10/26/93
12358 10/26/93
12358 10/26/93
12358 10/26/93
000100 ALLIED BARRICADE CONPAN C18 ~8' X 68" MESH 100-164'999-5242
000100 ALLIED BARR/CADE CONPAN C20/,8II X 68" MESH 100'164'999'5262
000100 ALLIED BARRICADE CCI~AN LEFT OVERLAYS FOR C20 100-164-999-5262
000100 ALLIED BARRICADE CONPAN IfiNDNASTER SIGN STANDS 100-164-999-5262
000100 ALLIED BARRICADE CCHPAN /,8'1 STAY & BRACKET (BRA 100-16~-999-5262
000100 ALLIED BARRICADE COMPAN t,/INDNASTER SIGN BRACKET 100-164-999-52/,2
000100 ALLIED BARRICADE CONPAN 18" CONES 100-164-999-5262
000100 ALLIED BARRICADE CONPAN TAX 100-164-999-52/,2
000100 ALLIED BARRICADE CONPAN SIGNAL STAT-FIREBALL DO 310-180-999-521/,
000100 ALLIED BARRICADE CONPAN TAX 310-180-999-5216
12359 10126/93 000123 BURKE glLLIANS & SOltENS LEGAL AUGUST 001-130-999-5266
12359 10/26/93 000123 BURKE U]LLIANS & SORENS LEGAL $ERV. JUNE 165-2030
12359 10/26/93 000123 BURKE WILLIAN$ & SORENS LEGAL SERV. JUNE 165-199-999-5250
12359 10/26/93 000123 BURKE WILLIAHS & SOltENS LEGAL SERV. JUNE 001-2030
12359 10/26/93 000123 BURKE gILLJAMS & SORENS 6/30 LEGAL SERVICE 001-2030
12359 10/26/93 000123 BURKE V]LLIAMS & SORENS 6/30 LEGAL SERVICE 001-130-999-5266
127"' 10/26/93 000123 BURKE gILLJAMS & SOltENS LEGAL AUGUST 001-130-999-5266
12L 10/26/93 000123 BURKE ~ILL]AMS & SURENS LEGAL AUGUST 190-180-999-5266
12359 10/26/93 O00123 BURKE gILLIAMS & SORENS LEGAL AUGUST 001-130-999-5266
12359 10/26/93 000123 BURKE WILLZANS & SORENS LEGAL AUGUST 300-199-999-5207
12359 10/26/93 000123 BURKE k/ILLIANS & SORENS LEGAL AUGUST 001-1280
12359 10/26/93 000123 BURKE MILLIAMS & SORENS LEGAL FEES RDA 280-199-999-5266
12359 10/26/93 000123 BURKE ~ILLIAMS & SORENS LEGAL AUGUST 001-130-999-5266
68.00
68.00
27.00
588.00
76.00
68.00
281.25
91.16
120.00
9.30
3,150.00
3,276.20
728.00
2,356.15
5,676.73
10.00
20,627.75
1,577.50
81.00
3,510.52
306.00
2,22L70
6,655.35
1,396.71
69,975.90
12360 10/26/93 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE ANNUAL LANDSCAPE NAINTE 190-180-999-5250
3,762.53
3,762.53
12361 10/26/93 000238 FINAL TOUCH MARKETING FY 93'96'; MARKETING PR 280'199'999'5264
1,238.00
1,238.00
12362 10/26/93 000251 PLANNING CENTER, THE GENERAL PLAN CONTRACT A 001-161-999-5268
12363 10/26/93 000271 ROBERT BEIN, tJN FROST & DESIGN OF MARGAR[TA' RD. 210-165-606-5802
1,782.20
1,300.00
1,782.20
1,300.00
12364 10/26/93 000281 SCHUNACHER AUTO SALE & SUPPLY MATERIALS & LABO 190-180-999-5610
12364 10/26/93 000281 SCHUMACHER AUTO SALE & TAX 190-180-999-5610
2,662.50
190.84.
2,653.36
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY 29,500; LETTERHEAD ENVE 001-163-999-5220
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY 29,500; LETTERHEAD ENVE 001-150-999-5220
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY 29,500; LETTERHEAD ENVE 001-161-999-5220
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY 29,500; LETTERHEAD ENVE 190-180-999-5220
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY 29,500; LETTERHEAD ENVE 001-120-999-5220
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY 29,500; LETTERHEAD ENVE 001-110-999-5220
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY 29,500; LETTERHEAD ENVE 001-160-999-5220
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY 23,000; LETTERHEAD STAT 001-163-999-5220
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY 23,000; LETTERHEAD STAT 001-150-999-5220
123F'- 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY 23,000; LETTERHEAD STAT 001-161-999-5220
12: 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY 23,000; LETTERHEAD STAT 001-162-999-5220
218.36
109.17
218.34
909.75
291.12
256.73
165.56
73.~
68.96
195
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 2
10/14/93 14:53 ~
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER[ODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUHBER DATE NUI4BER NAHE
/TEN
DESCRIPTION
ACr,~UNT
NUNBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AHOUNT
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
12365 10/26/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
23,000; LETTERHEAD STAT
23,000; LETTERHEAD STAT
23e000; LETTERHEAD STAT
23,000; LETTERHEAD STAT
2ND SHEET PAPER
2ND SHEET PAPER
2ND SHEET PAPER
2ND SHEET PAPER
2ND SHEET PAPER
2ND SHEET PAPER
2ND SHEET PAPER
OFFICE SUPPLIES
TAX
TAX
TAX
TAX
TAX
TAX
TAX
TAX
500 BUSINESS CARDS; KEV
500 BUSINESS CARDS; BER
TAX
1~0-180-999-5220
001-120-;-5220
001-110-~9-5220
001-140J~9-5220
001-163-e~9-5220
001-150-999-5220
001-161-;-5220
190-180-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-110-;-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-110-~9~-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-150-999-5220
001-161-;-5220
001-162-999-5220
190-180-~-5220
001-120-;-5220
001-110-999-5220
001-140-~9-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
367.20
195.84
122.40
73.44
16.34
32.68
65.36
32.68
32.68
49.02
16.34
.16
14.79
37.16
101.50
40.27
33.03
18.24
27.70
27.70
4.30
3,
12366 10/26/93 000310 TEHECULA CREEK INN
12366 10/26/93 000310 TENECULA CREEK INN
CATERING
LUNCH/CH
001-2172
001-110-~9-5260
7,775.84
24.01
12367 10/26/93 000~06
12367 10/26/93 000406
12367 10/26/93 O00z~06
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
APRIL/NAY TEN BIKE PATR
TEHECULA BIKE PATROL
JULY PATROL
001-170-;-5326
001-170-999-5326
001-170-999-5326
4,095.15
2,884.41
2,~91.24
9,970.80
12368 10/26/93 000539
12368 10/26/93 000539
12368 10/26/93 000539
12368 10/26/93 000539
12368 10/26/93 000539
12369 10/26/93 000678
12369 10/26/93 000678
12370 10/26/93 000712
12371 10/26/93 000727
12371 10/26/93 000727
12371 10/26/93 000727
12371 10/26/93 000727
12371 10/26193 000727
12371 10/26/93 000727
12371 10/26/93 000727
12371 10/26/93 000727
12371 10/26/93 000727
WINNER YANADA ASSOCIATE
WINNER YANADA ASSOCIATE
WlIq4ER YAHADA ASSOCIATE
W]MMER YAHADA ASSOCIATE
WINNER YAHADA ASSOCIATE
RIVERSIDE CO. HEALTH SE
RIVERSIDE CO, HEALTH SE
FORD, STEVEN J.
NFPA
NFPA
NFPA
NFPA
NFPA
NFPA
NFPA
NFPA
NFPA
RE!I4BURSEABLES
PRINTING/REINB.
CREDIT/POSTAGE
PROFESSIONAL SERV. 9/1-
CREDIT/DELIVERY CHG*
ANIMAL CONTROL
ANIMAL CONTROL
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES C
PORTABLE FIRE EXTINOUIS
PORTABLE FIRE EXTINOUIS
FIRE EXTINGUISHERS; FIG
FREIGHT
TAX
10 TIPS FOR HOTEL/HOTEL
HONE HAZARDOUS MATERIAL
FRE I GHT
TAX
210-190-120-5802
210-190-120-5802
210-190-120-5802
210-190-120-5802
210-190-120-5802
001-172-~-5255
001-172-999-5255
250-190-129-5804
001-171-99~-5296
001-171-~-5296
001-171-999-5296
001-171-~99-5296
001-171-999-5296
001-171-~99-5296
001-171-~9-52~6
001-171-~99-5296
001-171-~-5296
134.31
1,748.06
168.88-
1,604.87
12,65-
4,256.72
6,0/,6.32
7,020.00
275.00
168.00
371. O0
27 · 65
61.02
275.00
206.25
22.65
36.53
3,305.71
10,303.Q4
7,020.00
VOUCHRE2 C]TY OF TENECULA
IO/Y"" 14:53 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUHBER DATE NUllER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AleXINT
CHECK
AHOUNT
12~71 10/26/93 000727 NFPA SPARk'Y'S CHECKLIST; CHI 001-171-999-5296
12371 10/26/93 000727 NFPA FREIGHT 001-171-9~-5296
12371 10/26/93 000727 NFPA TAX 001-171-999-5296
137.50
14.32
11.01
1,605.93
12372 10/26/93 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
12372 10/26/93 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
LANDSCAPE REVIEU 001-161-999-5250
LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION PL 193-180-999-5250
1,180.00
900.00
2,080.00
12375 10/26/93 000818 SIGNAL NAINTENANCE, INC 1~92-06 TRAFFIC SIGNAL 210-165-611-5804
123T5 10/26/93 000818 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE, INC TRAFFIC SIGNAL 210'165'611'580~
1237'J 10/26/93 000818 SIGNAL NAINTENANCE, INC RETENTION 210'2035
26,5~4.91
8,308.75
3,485.37-
31,368.29
12374 10/26/93 000822 DUIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIA PROFESSIONAL EMERGENCY 100-164-999-5402
12374 10/26/93 000822 DMIGHT FRENCN & ASSOCIA RETENTION 100-2035
6,882.49
4,533.90-
2,348.59
12375 10/26/93 000883 NONTELEONE EXCAVATING gORK ORDER t93-9~-41 100-164-999-5602
12375 10/26/93 000883 ~)NTELEONE EXCAVATING MORK ORDER t93-94-37 100-164-~-5402
12375 10/26/93 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING EXTRA IJO~K 100-16~-999-5402
12375 10/26/93 00088~ NONTELEORE EXCAVATING MORK ORDER #93-94-38 100-164-999-5402
12375 10/26/93 000883 NONTELEONE EXCAVATING JEDEDIAH SHZTH i Ht~f 7~ 100-16~-99~-5401
12375 10/26/93 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING ilOiK ORDER #9~-94-43 100-164-999-5402
12.~'''' 10/26/93 000929 T.B. PENICK CONSTRUCTION OF THE CON 250-190-129-5804
12 10/26/93 000929 T.B. PENICK CONTINGENCY FOR THE CON 250-190-129-580~
12376 10/26/93 000929 T.B. PENICK RETENTION 250-2035
2,796.00
1,990.00
161.72
3,850.00
2,500.00
990.00
426,822.65
48,634.72
47,546.37-
12,287.72
427,911.00
12377 10/26/93 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C NlSC. BLUEPRINT REPRODU 001-163-999-5268
12377 10/26/93 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS 001-120-999-5250
12377 10/26/93 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS 001-161-999-5250
12377 10/26/93 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C PROVIDE BLUEPRINTS AND 210-190-120-5802
12377 10/26/93 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS 210-190-120-5802
12377 10/26/93 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS 210-190-120-5802
12377 10/26/93 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS 001-163-999-5268
198.57
19.40
3.44
2,624.25
2,375.75
1,020.58
79.52
6,321.51
12378 10/26/93 000992 RAMONA TIRE TIRE SERVICES FOR CITY 310-162-999-5214
12378 10/26/93 000992 RAMONA TIRE TIRE SERVICES FOR CITY 310-162-999-5214
12378 10/26/93 000992 RANONA TIRE TIRE SERVICES FOR CITY 310-164-999-5214
12378 10/26/93 000992 RANORA TIRE TIRE SERVICES FOR CITY 310-162-999-5214
12378 10/26/93 000992 RANONA TIRE TIRE SERVICES FOR CITY 310-180-999-5214
12379 10/26/93 001006 BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS PAPER SUPPLIES 001-163-999-5220
12379 10/26/93 001006 BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS PAPER SUPPLIES 001-163-999-5220
12379 10/26/93 001006 BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS RP6092; 360583 330-199-999-5217
12379 10/26/93 001006 BURTRONiCS BUSINESS SYS ACF-2; 610705 330-199-999-5217
12379 10/26/93 001006 BURTRORICS BUSINESS SYS NAINTENANCE AGREENENT: 330-199-999-5217
12379 10/26/93 001006 BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS CUTTER 330-199-999-5217
12380 10/26/93 001007 NELSON PAVING & SEALING gORK ORDER #93-~-40 100-164-999-5402
12380 10/26/93 001007 NELSON PAVING & SEALING bI3RK ORDER #93-9~-36 KA 100-164-999-5402
12380 10/26/93 001007 NELSON PAVING & SEALING MORK ORDER 193-9~-35 100-164-999-5402
123~S~- 10/26/93 001007 NELSON PAVING & SEALING I)RK ORDER 93-94-48 100-164-~99-5402
12 10/26/93 001007 NELSON PAVING & SEALING MORK ORDER ~93-9~-27 100-164-999-5402
223.79
255.17
12.00
230.30
500.00
71.73
561.94
2,100.00
375.00
450.00
213.00
3,389.00
3,729.00
2,122.00
475.00
~7.00
1,221.26
3,771.67
10,552.00
VOUCHRE2
10/1A/93
14:53
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECIC
NUMBER
CHECIC
DATE
VENDOR
HUffiiER
VENDOR
NAHE
ITE14
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
]TE14
NiXINT
CHECK
N~UI/T
12381
12381
12381
12381
12381
12381
12381
12381
12381
12381
12381
12381
12382
12382
12382
12382
12382
12382
12382
12382
12382
12382
12382
12382
12382
12382
12382
12382
12382
12382
12382
12382
12383
12384
12384
12384
12385
12385
12385
12385
12385
12387
12387
12387
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
10/26/93
001037
001037
001037
001037
001037
001037
001037
001037
001037
001037
001037
001037
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001058
001084
001084
001084
001086
001086
001086
001086
001086
001124
001133
001133
001133
FALLBROOK LANDSCAPE
FALLBROOK LANDSCAPE
FALLBROOK LANDSCAPE
FALLBROOK LANDSCAPE
FALLBROOK LANDSCAPE
FALLBROOK LANDSCAPE
FALLBROOK LANDSCAPE
FALLBROOK LANDSCAPE
FALLBROOK LANDSCAPE
FALLBRO01C LANDSCAPE
FALLBRCX3K LANDSCAPE
FALLBROOK LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
ACCURATE LANDSCAPE
RANCHO PAVING
RANCHO PAVING
RANCHO PAVING
ADCO EQU]P14ENT SALES
ADCO EQUIPHENT SALES
ADCO EQUIPMENT SALES
ADCO EGUIPt4ENT SALES
ADCO EQUIPMENT SALES
CUNNINGHAM-DAVIS CORP.
TREE FOUNDRY
TREE FOUNDRY
TREE FOUNDRY
REPAIR 2 1/2" MAIN LINE
LABOR TO REPAIR 2 1/2"
IRRIGATION REPAIR EUA F
IRRIGATION REPAIR EMA F
IRRIGATION REPAIR EMA F
IRR[GATIOR REPAIR EUA F
IRRIGATION REPAIR EUA F
APPLY PRE'E14ERGENT HERD
INSTALL LANDSCAPING PER
DETAIL gORIC PER EgA FL-
DETAIL gORK PER EgA FL-
PLANT TREE, 15 GAL.,
IRRIGATION REPAIR - CLO
IRRIGATION REPAIR - CLO
IRRIGATION REPAIR - CLO
IRRIGATION REPAIR - CLO
IRRIGATION REPAIR - CLO
IRRIGATION REPAIR - CLO
IRRIGATION REPAIR - CLO
IRRIGATION REPAIR - CLO
IRRIGATION REPAIR ' CLO
IRRIGATION REPAIR - CLO
IRRIGATION REPAIR - CLO
IRRIGATION REPAIR - CLO
IRRIGATION REPAIR - CLO
REPAIR BACICFLON DEVICE
IRRIGATION REPAIR EgA
TREE TRI14141NG EUA # NO
IRRIGATION REPAIR EWA
IRRIGATION REPAIR EgA
IRRIGATION REPAIR EWA
IRRIGATION REPAIR EWA
SEPT LANDSCAPE NAINTENA
FRONT ST t DEL RIO PLAZ
SANTIAGO & FRONT ST - C
IdORic ORDER #93-94-25
SP 8-G BARTELL GRINDER
R-134 A CAGE C/M TCT
50082 EDGER ASSEMBLY UI
50120 CARBIDE CUTTERS
TAX
gORK ORDER #93-gA-A5
HAONOLIA GRANDIFLORA 36
KO~LREUTARIA BIPINATA 3
LIOUIDANBAR STYRACIFLUA
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5~15
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5~15
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5~15
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5~15
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-54.15
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5~15
193-180-999-5~15
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5~15
190-180-999-5250
100-164-999-5402
100-164-999-5401
100-164-999-5402
100-164-999-5610
100-164-999-5610
100-164-999-5610
100-164-999-5610
100-164-999-5610
100-164-999-5602
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
28.60
80.00
35.31
15.94
~2.38
44.00
52.50
600.18
375.15
320.00
1,400.00
45.00
362.39
2~.85
43.85
51.89
509.90
183,25
87.50
231.00
149.65
267.40
548.25
160.10
242.93
120,00
A3.85
225.00
425.75
242.90
550.40
319.00
6,172.00
6,3/,5.50
2,200.00
486.00
1,786.50
897.30
292.50
576.00
275.30
1,500.00
200.00
400.00
420.00
3,039.06
4,789.86
6,172.00
9,031.50
3,827.60
1,500.00
VOUCHRE2
IO/Y"" lZ~:53
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUNBER DATE NLNBER NANE
[TEN ACCOUNT ITEN
DESCRIPTION NUNBER ANOUNT
12387 10/2&/93 001133 TREE FOUNDRY
12387 10/26/93 001133 TREE FOUNDRY
12387 10/26/93 OO1133 TREE FOUNDRY
12387 10/26/93 001133 TREE FOUNDRY
SCHINUS TEREBINTH]FOLIU 190-180-999-5212
CUPANIOPSISANACARDIODE 190-180-999-5212
FREIGHT 190-180-999-5212
TAX 1~0-180-99~-5212
12388 10/26/93 O011&& CAL DOR SPECIALTIES, IN INSTALL Tk/O AUTO DOORS/ 190-26~0
12389 10/26/9'~ 001168 BANK OF N, IERICA
ADIqIN FEE ON REDEVLOP B 380-1990
35.00
100.00
350.00
89.51
7,86~.00
PAGE 5
CHECK
ANOUNT
1,594.51
7,864.00
2,5~.~.62
TOTAL CHECKS
6/,8,889.91
ITEM
NO.
4
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
C TYAPPROVAL .~~"
I ATTORNEY ,
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's
report as of August 31, 1993.
DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment
portfolio and receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government
Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in
compliance with the Code Sections as of August 31, 1993.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: 1. City Treasurer's Report as of August 31, 1993
2. Balance Sheet as of August 31, 1993
3. Schedule of Cash Receipts and Disbursements by Fund
for the Month of August 1993
October 26, 1993
City Treasurer's Report as of August 31, 1993
City of Temecula
City Treasurer's Report
As of August 31, 1993
Cash Activity for the Month of August:
Cash and Investments as of August 1, 1993
Cash Receipts
Cash Disbursements
Cash and Investments as of August 31, 1993
$
$
41,703,931
1,493,321
(2.088,119)
41,098,833
Cash and Investments Portfolio:
Type of Investment
Petty Cash
General Checking
Benefit Demand Deposits
Local Agency Investment Fund
Deferred Compensation Fund
Trust Accounts-TCSD Bonds
Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds
Institution
City Hall
First Interstate
First Interstate
State Treasurer
ICMA
Bank of Amedca
Bank of America
Yield
4.472%
2.751%
2.751%
Balance
800
47, 147
8,108
19,027,295
367,921
4,457,945
17,189,617
41,098,833
(1)
(1)
(1)-This amount is net of outstanding checks.
Per Government Code Requirements, this Treasurer's Report is in compliance with
the City of Temecula's investment policy and there are adequate funds available
to meet budgeted and actual expenditures for the next thirty days of the City
of Temecula.
Prepared by Tim McDermott, Senior Accountant
z
ITEM
5
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Planning Department/City Attorney
October 26, 1993
Memorandum of Understanding (M.O.U.) for Johnson Ranch Property
PREPARED BY:
'Gary Thornhill/Scott Field
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council APPROVE the Memorandum of
Understanding between the Johnson Machinery Company and the City of Temecula.
DISCUSSION: The attached M.O.U. is the result of discussions with Johnson
Machinery Company representatives relative to annexation of the property into the City of
Temecula.
The M.O.U. sets forth certain terms between the two parties relative to the
annexation of the property into the City of Temecula.
The project is located in Riverside County within the City of Temecula Sphere of
Influence, and is adjacent to Anza Road and Borel Road, and North of Rancho California
Road.
The applicant is proposing to develop the .property with a wide mix of commercial,
residential, institutional, and open space uses. The proposed Specific Plan for the property
provides approximately 4935 single family residential units on approximately 1307.2
acres, approximately 240,000 square feet of commercial and 315 high density residential
units within the approximately 37.2 acre Village Center, approximately 246.9 acres of
Open Space, approximately 80 acres of Public Institutional Uses, including schools and
parks, and approximately 89.5 acres of streets.
The M.O.U. recognizes that the City would realize substantial social-economic and
infrastructure benefits if the project were to be annexed into the City, and in exchange,
provides for certain assurances to the applicant relative to the processing of entitlements,
imposition of development fees, and the financing of public improvements relating to the
project.
It should be noted, however, that nothing contained in the M.O.U. would limit the
discretionary authority of the Planning Commission or City Council relative to development
proposals covered by this M.O.U.
FISCAL IMPACT: The M.O.U. would reduce planning fees from approximately
$100,000 to $45,000. Given the fiscal benefits to the City in annexing this and
surrounding properties, it is recommended that the Council approve this fee reduction.
The fiscal impact of the development on the City will be discussed in future reports as
negotiations and plans progress.
ATTACHMENTS:
Memorandum of Understanding
Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "A-1"
Exhibit "B"
Exhibit "C"
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Johnson Ranch
This Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") is reached by and
between the CITY OF TEMECULA, a California municipal corporation ("City"), and
JOHNSON MACHINERY COMPANY, a Califomia corporation ("Property Owner"), to
be effective as of ,1993.
RECITALS
A. Property Owner is the fee owner of approximately one thousand
seven hundred sixty-one (1,761) acres of unimproved land located in the
unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside ("County") as described on the
attached legal description and vicinity map marked Exhibits "A" and "A-l" attached
and made a part herein by this reference (the "Property").
B. The Property is proposed to be developed with mixed uses
consisting of 5,250 residential units, town center, commercial area, four school sites,
parks and natural open space (the "Project"). A copy of the current Project land use
plan map is attached marked Exhibit "B" and made a part herein.
C. The Property is included within the City's sphere of influence, and
the Property Owner may in the future seek to annex the Property to be included
within the municipal boundaries of the City.
D. City and Property Owner acknowledge that if the Property were to
be developed in the City, such development would result in the generation of
signfficant municipal revenue, public infrastructure facilities benefits, the enhancement
of the quality of life, and demand for governmental services such as police, fire,
schools, recreation, ,and flood control for the present and future residents of the City
which might not otherwise occur if the Property were to be developed in the County.
10-01-93 2.5426-00001
F: \DO C\172\930~003.3RD
The benefits to the City and Property Owner contemplated by such development
include:
(1) The opportunity for a high quality master planned
residential community and resultant tax revenues for the City.
(2) Payment on a "fair share" cost basis towards City and
regional traffic infrastructure systems.
(3) Payment of Public Facilities and impact mitigation fees.
(4) Participation in special assessment and community
facilities districts to finance City and regional infrastructure improvements.
(5) The creation of significant open space dedications for
public use and the protection of signfficant natural resources.
WHEREFORE, City and Property Owner by this MOU intend to set forth
an orderly procedure for the development of the Property, including the processing of
all discretionary entitlements, environmental review and annexation of the Property to
the City.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties wish to set forth their understanding
with regard to the Property as follows:
1. Property Owner may initiate and process an annexation and
development agreement, along with the Project EIR, general plan amendment,
specific plan, zoning and other entitlement permits for development of the Property .in
the City.
2. The development of the Property in the City in accordance with
the Project specific plan shall be phased to allow for orderly financing and the
payment of debt service, development and absorption.
3. City and Property Owner will meet and confer in good faith to
agree on Property Owner's fair share cost and method of financing construction of
public improvements relating to the Project.
4. The City and Property Owner agree that the City intends to adopt
a public facilities fee. City agrees that the amount of the public facilities fee shall be
10-01-93 25426-00001 2
F:\DOC\172\93090003.3RD
fixed as provided in an annexation and development agreement vesting the Project
land uses relating to the Property to be negotiated between the parties at a later
date.
5. Upon the request of Property Owner, the parties shall cooperate
in exploring the use of community facilities districts, special assessment districts, and
other similar financing districts for the financing of the construction or acquisition of
public infrastructure facilities, lands, and improvements to serve the Project and its
residents, whether located on-site or off-site of the Property. It is acknowledged that
nothing contained in this MOU shall be construed as requiring City or City Council to
form such a district or to issue or sell bonds to carry out a public financing program to
benefit the Project.
6. City and Property Owner agree that Property Owner shall pay for
the City's actual costs incurred in processing the entitlements for the Project in an
amount not to exceed $45,000. For purposes of this funding obligation, the
entitlements shall consist of the general plan amendment, specffic plan, zoning,
annexation and development agreement and environmental impact report for the
Project. Upon approval of this MOU, Property Owner shall pay $45,000 to the City
less any amounts previously deposited with the City for processing the entitlement
applications. Upon approval or denial of the Project by City or formal withdrawal of
the Project application by Property Owner, City shall return any unexpended funds on
deposit to Property Owner, less any processing costs incurred but not billed or paid
to date, in accordance with the schedule attached hereto as Exhibit C.
7. In addition to this MOU, City and Property Owner may enter into
an annexation and development agreement relative to the Property which will more
specifically set forth the development obligations and vested land use rights relating
to the Property and the financial obligations and commitments of the parties as set
forth in this MOU. It is the City's intent not to impose a separate fee or add any
additional amount to the public facilities fee as "extra consideration" for approving an
annexation and/or development agreement.
10-01-93 25426-00001
F:\DOC\172\93090003.3RD 3
8. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Property Owner and City
understand and agree that certain actions of City contemplated by this MOU including
but not limited to such actions as (i) approval of the entitlements for the Project; (ii)
annexation of the Property to the City; (iii) amendment of the City's general plan and
zoning ordinances; and (iv) the formation of assessment, community facilities or other
financing districts, may require compliance with legal procedures, regulations and
public hearings accompanied by discretionary decisions. City shall expeditiously
process all applications relating to the Project. The Property Owner and Community
Development Director shall work together to develop a schedule for processing the
entitlements for the project. The parties acknowledge that nothing contained in this
MOU shall be construed as precommitting or requiring the Planning Commission or
the City Council to approve any discretionary entitlements, general plan amendment,
financing district, annexation and development agreement, specffic plan, zone
amendment or other planning, zoning, or subdivision relating to the Property.
WHEREFORE, in understanding the foregoing, the parties have
executed this MOU as of the date set forth in the introductory paragraph of this MOU.
CITY OF TEMECULA, a California
municipal corporation
ATTEST:
By:
Mayor
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
10-01-93 25426-00001
F:\DOC\172\93090003.3RD 4
JOHNSON MACHINERY COMPANY, a
California corporation
By:
William R. Johnson, Jr.
President
10-01-93 25426-00001
F: ~)0C\172\93090003.3RD 5
EXHIBIT "A"
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
PARCEL 1:
THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 10. TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH,
RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE
OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF;
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN BOREL ROAD AS
DESCRIBED BY DEED TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE RECORDED JULY 2,
1974 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 82894 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA;
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA. A PUBLIC
CORPORATION, BY DEED RECORDED MARCH 25, 1988 AS INSTRUMENT NO.
79458 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL 2:
SECTIONS 15, 16 AND FRACTIONAL SECTION 22, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH,
RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO .THE OFFICIAL PAT
THEREOF;
EXCEPT FROM SECTION 16 THAT PORTION DESCRIBED BY DEED TO THE
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RECORDED
NOVEMBER 14, 1967 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 99865 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
10-01-93 25426-00001
F: \DOC\172\93090003.3RD
EXHIBIT "A-l"
VICINITYMAP
10-01-93 25426-00001
F:\DOC\172\93090003.3RD
of Influence
--PROJECT SITE
F
of Temecuia
Sphere of In:
F/GU'P/2
JOHNSON--RANG]
LOCATION MAP Johnson Maehinery Co.'
X-X
EXHIBIT "B"
LAND USE PLAN
10-01-93 25426-00001
F: \DOC\172\93090003.3RD
' // c2 t
// .~
// ~ .
,
Si~ , __i-
~IT C
RETURN OF DEPOSIT SCHED~
REFUND POLICY STATEMENT
Application Accc'pted for Process, Fees not Receipted
Application Acce~ted and Fe~s Ree.~ipted, No Process Begun
Initial Processing of Application B~gun
Staff Report and/or Conditions of Approval Written
Public Hearing Advertised, But Heating Not Held
Public Hearing Held or Decision on Application Made
100%
90%
75%
30%
20%
-0-%
ITEM NO.
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
-~'Tim D. Sarlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
October 26, 1993
Award Bid to Construct Additional 24" Corrugated Metal Pipe
at 28841 Vallejo
PREPARED BY:
Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council award contract for construction of additional 24" Corrugated Metal Pipe
(CMP) culvert in the public right of way at 28841 Vallejo to Monteleone Excavating, the
lowest responsible bidder for the sum of $12,400.
BACKGROUND:
In September of 1993, the Public Works Department in conformance with the City's current
purchasing procedures requested and received informal bids from three (3) contractors for the
following scope of work.
2.
3.
4.
Install 56 lineal feet, 24" 16 gage CMP
Remove and replace asphalt required for excavation
Export excess material
Grouted rip rap inlet and outlet ends
Hydrology Studies and calculations for this area confirm that the existing 24" CMP located
at 28841 Vallejo is undersized and recommends that it be reinforced with an additional 24"
CMP to allow smooth passage of water run-off along and around this area, and to allow
adequate drainage for both the 10 year and 100 year design storms.
The bids received were as follows:
Monteleone Excavating, Murrieta
Del Rio Construction, Temecula
Utah Pacific Construction, Murrieta
$12,400.00
$15,762.25
$17,750.00
pwl 5\egdrpt%93%1026\vellejo.egn
Monteleone Excavating has performed work in the past for the City of Temecule, Public Works
Department and we have found their work to be satisfactory. In addition, they can proceed
with the work upon notification of Council award and completion of executed contract
documents.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds are available in the Public Works Department Drainage Facilities Account #100-164-
999-5401 for the proposed scope of work at 28841 Vallejo.
Attachments:
Location Map
pwl 5%egdrpt%g3%1026Wallejo.agn
f,e¢z'
,.,,1
,.,4
LOCATION MAP
CITY OF TEMECULA
THIS AGREEMENT, made this 26th day of October, 1993, by and between
the City of Temecula a municipal corporation, duly organized and existing under and by
virtue of the hws of the State of California, herdhailer called the {"Contractor".
1. The Contractor, in consideration of the promises of the City hereinaft~ set forth,
hereby agrees to furnish all tools, equipment, labor and materials neces~ry to perform and
complete in a workma~lilte manner, all of the work required for the conslnaction of the
improvements described in Work Order No. 61 attached hereto. The work shall be
performed according to the City of Temecula's Procedures For Informsl Bidding For Public
Works Street M~inten~nce Work Orders of $25,000 or I ~s. Fis~l Y~r 1993-94.
(*Informal Bidding Procedures*).
Where the Work Order or the Informal Bidding Procedures describe portions of the
work in general terms, but not in complete detail, the htest version of the City of Temecula.
Departmcnt of Public Works Standards Drawings for Public Worl~ Construction (*Standard
Drawings*), and Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including al
supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern
California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California
(hereinafter, "Standard Specifications*) shall control Copies of the Standard Specifications
arc available from the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
In case of any conflict between the Standard Drawings and the Standard
Specifications, the Standard Drawings shall control. Where the Work Order, the Informal
Bidding Procedures, the Standard Drawings, or the Standard Specifications only describe
portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the
item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general
practice is to be used.
2. The City, in consideration of the performance of this ConWact, agrees to pay the
Contractor and the Contractor agrees to accept in full satisfaction for the work done
hereunder the sum of Twelve thousand four hundred dollars ($12.400), in accordance with
R:~naint\wkotd6 1 .AGR i
the bid of the Contractor which sum shall be paid to the Contractor within the time and in
the manner set forth in the Informal Bidding Procedures, final payment to be made within
thirty-five (35) days after filing Notice of Completion of said work and improvement with the
Riverside County Recorder.
3. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor code of the State of
California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and
the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification,
or type of workman needed to execute this Contract from the DirecWr of the Department of
Industrial Relations. These rates are on file in the office of the City Clerk. Copies may be
obtained at cost at the City Clerk's offwe in Temecula. Contractor shall pest a copy of such
wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wa~e rates as a minimum.
Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.15,
1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the
City, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or pertion thereof, for each
laborer, worker, or mechanic' employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any
work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of
the provisions of the Contract.
4. Contractor, by executing the Contract, hereby certifies:
*I am aware of the provision of Section 3?00 of the Labor Code
which requires every employer be insured against liability for
Workman's compensation or undertake self-insurance in
accordance with the pwvisions of that Code, and I will comply
with such provisions before commencing the performance of the
work of this Contract.'
5. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or
delivering materials to the site, shall be at the risk. of Contractor alone. Contractor agrees to
save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend City, its officers, employees, and agents, against
any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (Contractor's employees included) and
damage to pwperty, arising direcfiy or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or
out of the operations conducted by Principal, save and except claims or litigations arising
through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the City.
6. Contractor and subcontractors shall obtain all necessary licenses, including but not
limited to City business license.
R:~min~Xwkonl6 1 .AG~R 2 ~
IN WITNF.,qS WHERFX)F, the City has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto
subscribed and affixed by the [l~t_ayor/City Manager] and attested to by the City Clerk, both
thereunto duly authorized, and the Contractor has hereunto subscribed this Contract the day,
month and year hereinabove written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Monteleone Excavating,
(Contractor)
By: By:
Name: Name:
Tifie: Title:
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
(Date)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
R:~maint\wkon!61 .AGR 3
ITEM
NO.
7
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
SHAWN D. NELSON
OCTOBER 26, 1993
SOLID WASTE SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING
ELEMENT AND HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE
ELEMENT
PREPARED BY: ~~HYLLIS RUSE, SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Accept the final draft of the Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE)
and the Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE) as required by the
California Integrated Waste Management Act (AB 939).
Set December 14, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. at 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, CA as
the time and place to conduct a public hearing to consider testimony on the
SRRE and HHWE.
Direct the City Clerk to publish the attached Notice of Public Hearing in the
appropriate publication(s), with at least 30 days notice given prior to the date
set for public hearing.
Direct staff to submit copies of the final SRRE and HHWE to the Riverside
County Solid Waste Management Advisory Council Local Task Force for review
at least 30 days prior to the date set for public hearing.
|m~ale=~is~srtd/m~.M~ 1013~
DISCUSSION:
On October 6, 1992 the City Council approved the preliminary Source Reduction and
Recycling Element and Household Hazardous Waste Element in compliance with the
California Integrated Waste Management Act (AB 939). At that time, an initial study
was conducted to assess potential environmental effects of the elements, in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The study revealed
no substantial evidence that the project could have a significant effect on the
environments and a Negative Declaration was prepared and approved by the Council.
The documents have been reviewed and commented on by all interested agencies;
County of Riverside Local Task Force, California Integrated Waste Management Board,
and adjoining jurisdictions, and the final draft has been revised to incorporate
comments and changes as necessary. Revisions made to the SRRE and HHWE since
October 6, 1992 do not impact the provisions of the CEQA initial study and the
approved Negative Declaration.
The SRRE and HHWE delineate the City's goals and programs to achieve the reduction
of solid waste generation,'-diversion from landfills, and recycling of waste products as
prescribed by current State law. A public hearing is to be scheduled prior to adoption
of the final draft to allow for public input and comment on the documents and the
programs they outline. The SRRE prescribes a final review of the documents by the
County of Riverside Solid Waste Management Advisory Council Local Task Force prior
to public hearing.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
la'~lautn'~uv, hhw~..a~ 1013f3
ITEM
NO.
8
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROV~T,
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
October 26, 1993
Item No. 8 - Adoption of Travel Policy
RECOMMENDATION: Continue to the meeting of November 9, 1993, to allow
staff time to obtain requested information.
~-- Swj
ITEM
NO.
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: City Clerk
DATE: October 26, 1993
SUBJECT: Records Destruction Approval
RECOMMENDATION: Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided
under the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
BACKGROUND: On March 22, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution No. 92-17
which authorizes the destruction of certain city records which have become outdated,
obsolete or are excess documents, in compliance with Sections 34090 through 34090.7 of
the Government Code.
The records management program, administered by the City Clerk's Office, is in the process
of microfilming all inactive records that are over two (2) years old. The attached exhibit
details administrative plot plans for the years 1990 and 1991 which have been copied to
microfilm. Three microfilm copies have been prepared, one to be kept in the Planning
Department, one in the City Clerk's vault and one in permanent off-site storage.
The City Attorney has reviewed this request and has signed Exhibit "1" of the Annual Review
as provided for in Resolution No. 92-17.
ATTACHMENTS:
JSG
Destruction of Records Request
Resolution No. 92-17
Exhibit "1" (Executed by City Attorney)
RESOLUTION NO. 92-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE
DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN CITY RECORDS AS
PROVIDED BY SECTION 34090 OF THE
GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, the keeping of numerous records is not necessary after a certain period of
time for the effective and efficient operation of the government of the City of Temecula; and
WltF~REAS, Section 34090 of the Government Code of the State of California provides
a procedure whereby any City 'record which has served its purpose and is no longer required
may be destroyed; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 34090, the City Attorney has
reviewed and approved the Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy, attached hereto as Exhibit
"1" and incorporated by reference herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City Of Temecula
as follows:
SECTION 1. The records of the City of Temecula as set forth in groups on Schedule
I, which schedule is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, are hereby
authorized to be destroyed as provided by Section 34090 of the Government Code of the State
of California and in accordance with the provisions of said schedule upon the request of the
department head and with the consent in writing of the City Attorney, without further action by
the City Council of the City of Temecula.
SECTION 2. The provisions of Section 1 above do not authorize the destruction of:
a. Records affecting the ti~e to real property or liens thereon
b. Court records
Records required to be kept by statute
Records less than two (2) years old
The minutes, ordinances, or resolutions of the City Council of the City of
Temecula or of any City boards, committee or commission
3/Re, so~ 92-17 -1-
SECTION 3. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 2, the duplicates of records not
less than five (5) years old which axe no longer required are hereby authorized to be destroyed
as set forth in the attached Schedule A.
SECTION 4. The destruction of any record as provided for herein shall be by burning,
shredding or other effective method of destruction and said destruction shall be witnessed by the
City Clerk or her designee.
SECTION 5. The term "records" as used herein shall include documents, instruments,
books, microffim or papers.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPT~D, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 24th of March, 1992.
A'I'TEST:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
3/Resos 92-17 -2-
STATE OF CALIFO~)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, ~LINE S. GREEK, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that
the foregoing ResOlution No. 92-17 was duly adopted a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Temecula on the 24th day of March, 1992, by the following roll call vote;
AYES: S
COUNC1LlVI]E1VIBERS:
Birdsall, Moore, Lindemans, Mu~oz
Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMF~MBERS: None
June S. Greek, City Clerk
3/i~:os 92-17 -3-
EXHIBIT "1"
CITY OF TEMF. CUL~
DESTRUCTION OF OBSOLETE RECORDS POLICY
A. PURPOSR
To provide the timely destruction of outdated, obsolete and excess documents and records
which are of no use legally or otherwise to the various city departments, in compliance with
Sections 34090 through 34090.7 of the Government Code.
B. POLICY
It shall be the policy of the City of Temecula that the City Clerk or her designee shall
routinely destroy - by burning, shredding, erasure, or other permanent method of obliteration -
outdated, obsolete and excess documents and records in accordance with the following
procedures and subject to the following retention schedules. No record may be destroyed unless
specified in this Policy.
C. PROCF, DURES
The City Clerk or her designee shall submit a written request for permission to destroy
the documents, books, receipts, and other records (hereinafter "records") enumerated in this
Policy when:
1. It is determined that the record is obsolete and of no further use to the department
and the record is not needed for, or the subject of discovery of, pending claims or litigation
involving the City.
2. It is determined that the record is eligible for destruction according to the
following Records Retention Schedules and any other criteria for destruction have been complied
with.
3. The City Clerk's office shall submit a written request for destruction to the
department head listing the records to be destroyed, showing the age and type of record and the
applicable retention schedule.
4.' Destruction shall not occur until the department head, approves, in writing, the
request for destruction after checking with the City Attorney, as necessary, to verify the
document is not involved in a pending claim or litigation involving the City. The department
head may deny the destruction of any record or condition the destruction on the prior
microfilming of the record in accordance with Section E of this policy.
3/Resos 92-17 -4-
5. Once permission to destroy has been given, The City Clerk's office shall oversee
and witness the destruction. When destruction has been completed, the date and manner of
destruction and the attestation that the City Clerk or designee witnessed the destruction shall be
listed on the request form. The request for destruction together with the written approval of the
department head shall be maintained in a separate f~e kept by the City Clerk.
6. Disposal of any records, once destroyed as provided herein, may be made
pursuant to any recycling program or policy of the City.
D. RETEN'IION SCHEDULES
In compliance with Government Cede Sections 34090 and 34090.5, the following Records
Retention Schedule (Schedule A) has been established to implement and maintain this Policy.
E. VIDEO AND AUDIO SCHEDULES
Duplicates of records, less than two years old may be destroyed, if no longer required,
without microffiming. Video and audio recording mediums are considered duplicate records if
and when the City keeps another record such as written minutes of the event which is recorded.
However, a video medium shall not be destroyed for a period of at least 5 years after the event
recorded thereon.
F. LITIGATION SCHEDULES
These records must be kept for five (5) years or until such time as their relevance W, and
need in pending litigation or claims against the City is resolved through settlement with prejudice
or final court adjudication.
Written claims presented under the Government Tort Claims Liability Act.
2. Records related to, or involved in, pending criminal investigations and actions or
civil hwsuits.
E. MICROFILMING
Microfilming, when authorized in this Policy, shall be performed in compliance with all
of the following conditions:
3/Reaos 92-17
1. The record, paper, or document is photographed, microphotographed, reproduced
by electwnically recorded video images on magnetic surfaces, recorded in the electronic data-
processing system, recorded on optical disk, reproduced on film or any other medium which
does not permit additions, deletions or changes to the original document, or reproduced on film,
optical disk, or any other medium in compliance with the minimum standards or guidelines, or
both, as recommended by the American National Standards Institute or the Association for
Information and Image Management for recording of permanent records or nonpermanent
records, whichever applies.
2. The device used to reproduce the record, paper, or document on film, optical
disk, or any other medium is one which accurately and legibly reproduces the original thereof
in all details and which does not permit additions, deletions or changes to the original document
images.
3. The photographs, microphotographs or other reproductions on film, optical disk
or any other medium are made as accessible for public reference as the original records were.
4. A true copy of archival quality of the film, optical disk, or any other medium
reproductions shall be kept in a safe and separate place for security purposes.
No page of any record, paper or document shall be destroyed in any page cannot be
reproduced on film with full legibility. Every non-reproducible page shall be permanently
preserved in a manner that will afford easy reference.
ANNUAL REVIEW BY CITY ATTORNEY
The City Clerk shall be responsible for requesting an annual review of this Policy by the
City Attorney. This request shall be made through the City Manager.
Pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 34090, I hereby give my consent to
the destruction of records under the direction of the City Clerk pursuant to this Policy
City Attorney Date:
City of Temecula
3/Re. Rm 9'2-17 -6-
Group
No.
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
XI
XII
XIII
CITY OF TEMECULA RECORDS RETENTION SL'*TIFJ~ULE
· Record
:T~Ue' or' Description ...... .ORIG DUP Office' :' ::':'Center
lyre.) lyre.)
:'Destroy ':
lyre.)
Records affecting title to real property or liens X
thereon
2 P If Micro
2 P If Micro
2 P If Micro
Records required to be kept permanently by
statute
Minutes, ordinances and resolutions of the
City Council or Boards and Commissions.
Documents with lasting historical,
administrative, legal, fiscal, or research value.
X 2 P If Micro
Records which do not require permanent
copies for storage purposes
X 4 4 yre.
Correspondence, operational reports end
information upon which City policy has been
established.
X 2 10 12
Duplicates of V above, when retention is
necessary for reference
X 2 2
X 2 13 15
Records requiring retention for more than five
years but no more than fifteen years by
statute or administration value.
Duplicates needed for administrative purposes X
for five - fifteen years.
2 13 15
All other original City records, or instruments,
books or papers that are considered public
documents not included in GroUps I through
VIII
2 1 3
Duplicates end other documents not public
records required to be maintained for
a~lministrstive purposes.
X X 2 3 5
Duplicate records requiring retention for
administrative purpose such as reference
material for making up budgets, for planning,
and programming.
X 3 3
Reference files. (Copies of documents which
duplicate the record copies filed elsewhere in
the City; documents which require no action
and ere non-record; rough drafts, notes,
feeder reports, and similar working papers
accumulated in preparation of a
communication, study or other document,
end cards, listings, indexes and other papers
used for controlling work).
X I 1
Schedule A
REMARKS
Note: Any item can be
destroyed if two copies
of microffim done with
one in eefe storage end
accomplished properly.
Destruction years only
apply if not on film.
Note: Any item not on
microfilm and subject to
destruction will not be
destroyed without
written peffnieeion of
the depertment heed
end the City Attorney.
Note: Regardless of
Office Retention period
as listed, eedier transfer
to the Retrieval Cent-"'~
is authorized.
Note: Original council
minutes, ordinances,
resolutions end official
bonds will not be
destroyed even if
microfilmed.
3/ReJo. 92-17 -7-
ConTinued...
XIV
Transitory files, including letters of trsrmmittai
(when not · public record) suspense copies when
reply has been received, routine requests for
information end publication, tracer letters, feeder
reports, end other duplicates copies no longer
needed
XV
Original documents disposable upon occurrence of
an event or an action (i.e., audit, job completion,
completion of contract, etc.) or upon obsolescence,
superlesion, revocation.
XVI Policy files end reference sets of publications.
Xvll
Duplicates or non-record documents required for
administrative needs but destroyable on occurrerme
of an event or an action.
X
x 3
2
X Indef Indef
X Indef Indef
3
Note: Destroy upon supe~session or
obsolescence,
3/P~so~ 92-17
DFSCRIPTION OF PI:,RMAN~.NT RF, CORDS
ATTachment to Schedule "A"
Group I -
Records - Affecting Property Title or Liens
Group I documents shall not be subject to destruction, except if microfilming or reproduction
by other medium which does not permit additions, deletions or changes to the original document is performed
in strict accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 34090.5.
Building and Safety: Utilities: Deeds Parks:
Building Permits Lights Signs Bikeways
Capital Impwvements: Water Curbs Landscaping
Plans Power Gutters Right-of-way
Drawings Cablevision Walks Weed Abatement
Checks &Inspection Television Bikeways Striping
Easements Maps: Drainage: Housing
Street Names &Numbers Streets Flood Control General Plan:
Liens Light Soil Erosion Amendments
Condemnations Trees Hydrology Zoning
Assessments Signals Parking
Group H
Group HI
Group IV
A.
B
C
Group V
Records Required to be kept by Statute
Minutes, Ordinances and Resolutions of City Council or Boards and Commis ~';
Announcements, Notices, Affidavits, Agendas, Minutes, Resolutions, Ordinances,
Proclamations, Supporting Exhibits
Documents with lasting administrative, legal, fiscal, historical or research value.
Administrative - Personnel cumulative records, Reviews, Action, Promotions, Time Records,
Leave, CETA, Policy and Procedures, OSHA Inspections, Affirmative Action Program, any like
above.
Fiscal Audit - Annual and Semi-annual, Monthly Budget Allocations, Appropriations,
Expenditures, Encumbrances, Journals and Ledgers, Inventory, Payroll, Receipts, Collections,
Cash, Check Register, Capital Property, Business License, Fees, Schedules, Grants, Bonds,
Trust Funds, Revenue Sharing, Treasurer's Register.
Historical - City Organization Charts, Service Organizations, Chamber of Commerce,
Homeowners' Associations, City Flower/Tree, Teen Centers, Schools, Universities, Press
Releases, Department Staff Summaries, Report and Statistical Analyses.
Bicycle Licenses, Purchase orders and requisitions, Contracts or Agreements, despite a
shorter term provided therein and Entertainment/Special Event Permits
3/Resos 92-17 -9-
TO: City Clerk
FROM: Gail Zigler,
Office Specialist
DATE: October 8, 1993
SUBJECT: Destruction of Records Request
Attached is a print out of Administrative Plot Plans (Retention Type PPA) dating
from 7/16/90 to 10/1/91. These records have been microfilmed in triplicate with
a copy distributed to the City Clerk's Records Vault, the Planning Department and
a copy to the Vault in San Diego.
The following have reviewed and approved this destruction request.
Pursuant to the requiremtns of Government Code Section 34090, I hereby give my
consent to the destruction of records under the direction of the City Clerk pursuant
to the City of Temecula's adopted Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy.
Department Head:
City Attorney:
Gary Thornh1~, Planrang D~rector
Date
Scott F. Field
/a
Date
R:\forrns%destruct.rqs
BRINACT...RIIQ51 City of TeemcaLm Doc. Re# ...... 161 Page 1
10/06/1993 Inactive ireful Liettng Retention Type PPA .. 09:1h21
Inactive Date. 10/01/1993
Doc. Item Action
iY"~ Date Ref. Taken Brief Description Keyuords
161 07/16/i990 99 Administrative PLot PLon PresLey of Jan Diego
AP # 926-016-0101, 011,012, O
Rat TypeoPPA FiLe Be# # .... -OOOlOOOlOTU
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Highaey 79, 2 aiLes
Exp.- Referred tQ...-PLeming Dapertaent nit of Highly 15
161 11/0/,/1990 1 Administrative PLot Non Aztec Properties
Signage
Rat Type-PPA Fi Le Re# # .... -OOO1OOO1OOO9 AP # 921-070-006-5
toni- Security CLass-Group ! Car#sic# & Stuff
Exp.- Referred to...-PLenning Dapertaent Front Street &Rends caitforn
is Road
8 Administrative PLot PLon ButterfLy Signs
161 11/05/1990
Signage
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -QO010Q01QO6/, Best BaiLs
Co~t- Security CLass-Group ] deffers4mAvenue, 27&59
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanninODlpirtBent
161 11/06/1990 177 Administrative PLot Pton Foster Freeze
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
FiLe Re# # .... -000100011280
Security CLass-Group
Referred to...-PLenningDepertRmnt
Signage
AP # 910-200-062-6
Jefferson Avenue llest, 27300-A
See Aperature Card for Map(m)
1~ )/06/1990 3 Administrative PLot PLm T & S Aoseciates
Tony Rams
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Ref # .... -00010001003~ Signage '
Cont* Security CLass-Group ! AP # 910-130-018
Exp.- Referred to..,-Ptanning Department Jefferson Avenue,
161 11/07/1990 10 Administrative PLot PLan Duncan CraMs DeveLqmment
Ret Type-PPA
CoAt°
Exp.-
FiLe Ref # .... -000100010073
Security CLass-Group X
Referred to..,-Ptanning Department
Signage
AP #909-270-012-8
Enterprise CircLe, So.,41860
161 11/07/1990 23 Administrative PLot PLmn C~otemn Names, inc rte RiaLto
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp,-
FiLe Re# # .... -000100010178
Security CLass-Group I
Referred to..,-PLanningDepertaent
PLot PLonModification
Rencho HighLands SP180
AP #94~-020-002-3
Catte Nacjdo and Co
161 11/07/1990 /, Administrative PLot PLan Bedford Properties American Fon& Vec
Signage
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100010039 AP J921-700-007
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Rancho CaLifornia Road and
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptenning Departeent Mergerite Reid
161 11/07/1~0 5 Administrative PLot PLan Bedford Properties Fabric Store
"' Signage
Rt .je-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -00010001004~ AP # 921-700-007
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Rencho CaLifornia Roecl end
Exp,- Referred to,,,-PLanning Department Mergerira Road
RRIMACT...RROS1 City of Teemcuts Page 2
10/06/1993 Inactive Ststul Listing : 09:11:21
Doc. Item Action
Re#. Date Re#. Taken Brief Description Key~ords
161 11107/1990 6 Administrative PLot PLan Bedford Properties
Signage
Bet Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100010051 AP # 92~-700-007
Cont- Security CLass-Group ! Ranch, CaLifornia Road and
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Dqartaent fierOar#re Road
Insurance and Income Tax
161 11107/1~X)0 7 Administrative PLot PLan Bedford Prq;erttes
Signage
Rat Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100010058 AP # 921-700-011
Cant- Security CLass-Group I Ranch, California Road and
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanntng DepartBent 14argarita Road
C t sans rs
161 11/08/1~90
Ret Type-PPA
Exp. -
11 Administrative Plot Plan
FiLe Re# # .... -00010001008~
Security CLass-Group !
Referred to...-PLsnningDepartBent
Abt LiLy Cabinets
Landscape Revise
AP # 909-270-023
Enterprise CircLe South, North
Parcel 16, P.N. 19582-1
161 1110811990 9 Administrative PLot PLan GeraLd NobLe,/
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
FiLe Re# # .... -000100010070
Security CLuB-GroUp
Referred to...-PtanningOepertment
Landscape PLan
AP # 921'230,00~,002,00~,018
Rancho CaLifornia Road, )0580
VeL ks Fargo Bank
161 11/09/19~0 12 Administrative PLot Plan Johnson ALLen Corporation '1
Purpose - Landscape PLans
AP # See FiLm (~ totaL)
161 1111311990 13 Administrative PLot PLan Xnclustriat DeveLopers
Tenant Improverents
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100010100 AP # 922-093-002
Cont- Security CLass-Group1 Front Street, 28822
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department Units 10) and
161 11/13/1990 14 Administrative PLot PLan Robert CaLvin
Smogs R Us
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100010104 Termnt lmprove. Lmts
Cont- Security CLass-Group I AP # 910-200-074
Exp.- Referred to...-PtanningDeperment Ynsz Road, 2~111.
161 11/13/1~0 15 Administrative PLot PLan Bedford Properties
Signage
Rat Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100010108 AP # 910-130-022
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Ynsz end Uinchester Road
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptanning Department Palm PLaza
e e e e e e , , , e i e e e w e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e w m e e e e e e e e e
161 11/14/1~90 16 Administrative PLot PLan A & A Sign Company
Signage
Ret Type-PPA File Ref # .... -Q0010C)010133 Help-U-Sell Realty
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Jefferson Avenue, 27420
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -00010001001t
Cont- Security CLass-Group l
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department
RRINACT...RRQ51 City of TeemcuLo Poge 3
10/06/1993 Inactive Status Listing : Qg:1h21
Dec. i Tern Act i on
lie~ Date Ref. Token Brief Description I(eyvords
161 11/15/1990 17 Administrative PLot PLan VoLLey gatem
SignsBe
Rot Type-PPA Fi Le Ref # .... -0OO100010138 AP # 910-Q2Q-82
Cent- Security CLass-Group I NodLion Avenue, 27250
Exp.- Referred to,.,-PLanning Department
161 11/15/199o 18 Administrative PLot PLan Lena CoLLins
Pak Ibi L
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Ref # .... -QQOIQOQlO138 Signage
Cent- Security CLass-Group ! AP # g21-250-018
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Dqarment lancho CaLifornia Road, 30550
161 11/16/1~0 20 Administrative PLot PLan Steve kith
lenant I ~row mt
Ret Type-PPA Fi Le Ref # .... -000100010156 AP # ~,2-210-0~5-9
toni- Security CLan-Group I Bedford Court, ~4535
Exp.- Referred to,,.-Ptanntng Department Tee#cute Ptzze Coalany
See Aperature Card For Nap(a)
161 11/19/1990 21 Ad, iniatrmtive PLot PLan Southern California Lend Corp
Tenant Improvements
Rot Type-PPA Fite Ref # .... -000100010162 AP # 922-024-020 & OZ2
Cent- Security CLass-Group ! Sixth Street, 41910
Exp.- Referred to...-PLonning Delartaent See Aperature Card for llmp
. .~., ..............................................................
16 19/1990 Z2 Administrative PLot PLan ULtraneon Sign Co81xmy
SignaBe
eel Type-PPA FiLe Ref # .... -00010001171 AP # 922-120-00~
Cont- Security Ctass-Gr~Jp Z Front Street, 28822
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptanning DepartBent See AperotureCard for !lap(a)
161 11/21/1~0 24 Administrative PLot PLan Bedford Properties
Signage
Bet Type-PPA FiLe Ref # .... -000100010182 DoubLetree Suites
Cent- Security CLass-Group ] AP # 923-020-038
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptoming Department Ynaz Road and Roncho Cotiforni
o, Southit Corner
See Aperature Cord for Hap(o)
161 11/27/1~0 25 Administrative PLot PLan K:C. ss Hobbies
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
FiLe Ref # .... -000100010186
Security CLass-Group
Referred to...-PtanningDef3ertaent
SipBe
AP # 921-680-008-2
Notor Car ParkMay, 61915
161 11/28/1~0
Ret Type-PPA
Exp.-
27 Administrative PLot PLan
FiLe Ref # .... -0001000101~
Security CLass-Group !
Referred to...-Ptanning Department
ALIa Engineering
Reamdiet gaLL & Stairamy
Rancho CaLifornia Read, 29377
See Aperature Card for NOp(s)
m w w , w w m w m , ~ m m w m w w w w w w w w w w w w e m w w w w w m w w w w w w w m w w e w w w m m w w m w w m w w w w w w w m
161 11/28/1990 28 Administrative PLot PLan Calvary Blptilt Church
-~"" LandscaiN PLane
Ret ~-PPA Fi Le Ref # .... -000100010200 AP # 914-510-009
Cont- Security CLass-Group ] Iticotes Read, 30187
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptanning Departlent See Apereture Card for NapCa)
RRINACT...RR051 City of TemecuLe Page
10/06/lf~3 Inactive Status Listing : (W:lh21
Dec. item Action
Re#. DaCe Re#. liken Brief Description Keyvords
2~ Administrative PLot PLan A & A Sign Coalany
161 11/28/1FN)
Signage
Rat Type-PPA Fi Le Re# # .... -000100010216 AP # ~0~-260-005
Cent- Security CLass-Group ! Jefferson Avenue, 27433
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department
161 1112911990 30 Adniniatretive PLot PLan Bedford PreFerties
Signage
Ret Type-PPA FtLe Re# # .... -000100010221 AP # 910-130-002
Cent- Security CLass-Group ! Ynez Road, 2~31
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning So~rtaent The Gym Bag
161 1112911990 31 Administrative PLot PLan Bedford Properties .
Sjgrlge
Ret Type-PPA File Ref # .... -000100010230 AP # 910-130-002
Cent- Security CLass-Group I Ynez &Winchester Roads
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptenning Departrot Pack N Nail
161 11129119990 32 Administrative PLot PLan Tarfelon Corporation
Keel#ski
Ret Type-PPA Fi Le Re# # .... -000100010237 Signage
Cent- Security CLass-Group I AP # f31-680-008-2
Exp.- Referred to...-PLarming Department Ynez Road and SolIns Way
161 1112911990 33 Administrative PLot PLan Bedford Prq)ertias ;
Signage
Ret Type-PPA File Re# # .... -0001000102~6 AP # 910-130-002
Cent- Security CLass-Group I Ynez & ginchester Road
Exp.- Referred to...*Ptanning Department Palm PLaza Cleaners
161 11/29/1990 36 Administrative PLot Plan Warren James
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
File Re# # .... -000100010263
Security CLass-Group l
Referred to...-PLnnnjngDepartment
Landscape PLan Revie~
Business Park Drive, 4303~
Lot 9 of Parcel Map 1~580
See Aperature Card for lap(I)
161 11/29/1990
Rat Type-PPA
Exp. -
84 Administrative Plot Plan
File Ref # .... -000100010638
Security CLass-Group 1
Referred to...-PtanningDepertment
Applicant - H & R BLock
Purpose - Signage
AP # 921-320-009-0
Location - Suite #HS, Rancho
California Term# Canter
161 1113011990 3/, Administrative PLot PLan Marlborough DevelopRent
Landscape Developant PLan
Ret Type-PPA File Ref # .... -000100010253 Check
Cent- Security CLass-Group I AP # 92S-200-019
Exp.- Referred to... -PLanning Department Location - Chardonnly Ht t is
161 11/3011990 35 Administrative PLot PLan Lyon CoReunities See Aperature Card for Nap(a)
Model Home PLot PLan Reviml ~
Ret Type-PPA File Ref # .... -000100010257 AP # Tract 22627-1 '
Cent- Security Ctesa-Groupl General Kearfwy Road, North
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department near NiceLea Road
RREIIACT...RRO51 City of Teeecuta PIge 5
10/06/1993 inactive Status Listing : 09:11:21
Doc. Item Action
Re/'--` Date Re#. Taken Brief Description Keyuords
161 12/02/1990 37 Administrative PLot PLan Bedford Properties
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
E~.-
File Re# # .... -000100010267
Security Clams-Group !
Referred to,. .-Ptanning Department
Signage
AP # 910-130-022/910-136-006
Palm PLaza (Neeueent Sign)
161 12/0&/1990 38 Administrative PLot PLan
Rat Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100010275
Cont- Security CLmma-Gro~p l
Exp.- Referred to...-PLennjng DepartBert
Tim Shook
GLares ShoO Tenant i., :ov writs
AP #
Commerce Canter Drive, 27616
lee Apermture Card for 14apes)
39 Administrative PLot PLan Supersign System ' Pet Pay# L I ion
161 12/06/1990
Signage
Ret Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100010279 APe 910-130-022
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Ynez Road, 264~9
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Deplrtlent PILl PLaza Shq:q)tng Center
161 12/12/1990 60 Administrative PLot PLan Bedford Prqoertiam
Signage
Ret Type-PPA Fi Le Re# # .... -000100010283
Cont- Security CLams-Group I Palm PLaza Shopping Canter
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department See Aperefute Card for Map(a)
la /12/1990 61 Administrative PLot PLan Mesa Homes Paulca Road and 14argarttl Road
Landscape PLans Southeast Corner
Rat Type-PPA Fite Re# # .... -0001~0010289 Tract 2/.134 Stratacapes See Aperlturs Card for Nap(I)
Cant- Security CLass-Group I in Accordance uith S.P. 219
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department AP # 923-23-01
161 1Z/1)/1990 19 Administrative PLot PLan Baskin & Robbins, USA See Aperature Card for limp{a)
Tenant I& rov~ents
Ret Type-PPA File Ref # .... -000100010152 AP #
Cant- Security CLass-Group I Ynez Road, 26491 t27-0
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptarmjng Department Palm Plaza
161 12/13/1990 42 Acknininstrative PLot PLan Fuller Sign & Design
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
File Re# # .... -000100010295
Security CLass-Group l
Referred to...-Ptmnning DepartBent
Sign Pemjt
Ap # 921-310-019
Rancho California Bold, 29762
Quick StoONtni 148rket
161 12/1/*/1990 53 Administrative PLot PLan J.C. Penny CoWany Winchester ire
Tenant Improvements
Ret Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100010359 AP #
Cant- Security CLams-Group I Jefferson Avenue, 27/*35
Exp.- Referred to...*PLanning Depmrtmt J.C. Penny Catalog Store,
See Apermture Card for leap{a)
m w m e w w w e , w , e w w w w w w w w w w w w w e w m e w m m m m w m w w e e w e e e
161 1211711990/.3 Administrative Plot PLan Bedford Properties
~' Signage
Re e-PPA File Re# # .... -000100010364 AP # 921-700-008
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Vineyard Dental
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptanning Department Paleear Village
RRiIUkCT...RRQ51
10/06/1993
City of T~B~cuLm
Page 6
09:11:21
Doc. ]tern Action
Re#. Date Re#. Token Brief Description Keyuords
161 12/17/1990 ~ AdBtniatrative PLot PLan TGI Video
Sjgrige
Ret Type-PPA Fite Ref # .... -000100010310 AP # 921-070-006-5/922-0Z3-019
Cont- Securi ty CLaM-Group ] -8
Exp.- Referred to...-PLmnning Delarteent Front $treet,2~lO
161 12/17/1990 45 AdBiniatrative PLot PLan Bedford Properties
Signage
Ret Type-PPA Fi Le Re# # .... -00010001(Z316 AP #
Cortt- Security CLaM-Group ] Itencho CaLifornia &Yukon Road
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptanning Departlint The Whet#horse
161 1211711990 46
Administrative PLot PLan
Ret Type-PPA
Cont -
Exp. -
FiLe Re# # .... -000100010)24
Security CLass-Group
Referred to...-PtanningDepartBent
Rancho aN)tier Church
Signage
AP #
Santiago Road, 29775
Ret Ty~e-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
161 12/18/1990 47 Administrative 'PLot PLan Lusardi Construction AP #
Professional Hospital SuppLy Business Park Drive, northvest
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100010331 Hoffes, John (Ocher) aide
Cont- Security CLass-Group i Purpose - Landscape Revie~ for See Aperature Card for Nap(s)
Exp.- Referred to...-PLenning Department PP #20
............ - ...................................................
161 12/18/1990 48Administrative PLot PLanMarie Johnson See Aperature Card for
S i gnage
Rat Type-PPA Fi Le Re# # .... -000100010336 AP # 921-080-06
Cont- Securi ty CLass-Group i Jefferson Avenue, 27452,
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department Suite B-3 (Remedy Tamp)
161 12/19/1990 49 Administrative PLot PLan Rainkx~ Canyon Estates
FiLe Re# # .... -0001000103~1
Security CLass-Group i
Referred to...-Ptanning Department
Landscape/irrigation PLans
Tract Map 23177
AP # 922-220-018
See Aperature Card for Hap(a)
161 12/21/1990
Rat Type-PPA
Exp. -
50 Administrative PLot PLan
FiLe Re# # .... -000100010347
Security CLass-Group i
Referred to...-Ptanning Department
Orion Johnson
Martinaz, John &Bobbie
Construction of new home
See Aperature Card for Nap(a)
AP
Santiago Road, 30~O
161 12/26/1990 51 Administrative PLot PLan Paytess Shoe Source
Signage
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100010350 AP #
Cont- Security CLass-Group ! Ynoz Road, 26439 PaLm PLaza
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning DepartBent See Aperature Card for 14apCI)
161 12/28/1990 52 Administrative PLot PLan Bedford Properties See Aperature Card for Nip(s)
Signage ~'~
Rat Type-PPA Fite Re# # .... -000100010355 AP # 9Z3-020-038
Cont- Security CLass-Group ] Rancho CaLifornia & Ynaz Road
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanntng Delpartment DoubLetree Suites
lIR]BACT...RR051 City of Tamecute Pmee
10/06/1993 inactive Status Listing : 99:1hZl
Doc.
R(/'~
161 01/02/1~1
Ret Type-PPA
Coat -
Exp. -
item Action
Bate Re#. Taken Brief Description ICeyvords
56 AdBiniatretive PLot PLan St Lver~ood DeveLolxmnt
La~rcfr,
File ief # .... -000100010)8~ AP #
Security CLass-Group ! Ruidosa, )111& - )1126
Referred to...-PLanning DeferTaBor
161 0110211991 87 Administrative PLot PLan Applicant - Bedford Developman , EIIt of 14atOmrite Road
t
Rat TyFe-PPA File Re# # .... -00010O01065? Purpose - Landscape
Coat- Security CLass-Group ! AP # 966-QaO-Q1Q
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Deloertment Location - South of Pauba Road
1.61 0110311991 55 Administrative PLot PLan Aztec Properties
Signage
Rat Type-PPA File Re# # .... -0O010O010373 AP # 921-070-006-5
Cont- Security Class-Group I Front Street & Rencho Cettforn
Exp.- Referred tQ...-PLenning Department ie Road
Foothill Stores Satellite TV
161 011O311991
Rat Type-PPA
Exp. -
56 AcbinietrativePLot PLan
File Re# # .... -00O10O010379
Security CLass-Group l
Referred to...-Ptanning Department
Land Grant Devetepaent
Simply Perfect Catering
Signage
AP # V31-320-020-9
Rencho California & Ynez Road
16 /0~/1991 57 Administrative PLot PLan Superior ELectrical Advertise 99-260-019-2/909-260-016-9/90~
Signage -240-023-5
Rat Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100010386 AP # 909-260-001-5/909-260-005 Jefferson Avenue, 27603-27fi5
Coat- Security CLass-Group I -9/90~-260-015-8190~-260-026-7 Vanchester Square
Exp.- Referred to...-PLenning Department /909-2~0-026-8/909-2&0-006-0/9 See Aperature Card for Nap(I)
161 01/08/19fl 58 Administrative Plot PLan Barrett/merican
Nodal Hone PLot Plan
Ret Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100010392 AP #911-593-0O3-5/911-593-0O2-
Cont- Securi ty CLass-Group I 6
Exp. - Referred to... -PLanning DepartBefit Swat toed Court
Tract 22962
See Aperefute Card for Nap(a)
161 01/10/19~1 59 Administrative PLot PLan 14esa Homes rner (Pals Det Sol)
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
FiLe Re# # .... -000100010/,03
Security CLass-Group I
Referred to...-PLanning Departwent
Landscape PLan - Tract 2613~
Paaees
AP # 9Z3-Z3-01
Pea & Hera#rile Roads, SV Co
161 01111/1991 60 Administrative PLot PLan Sen Diego Trust & Savings Bank
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
FiLe Re# # .... -0O0100010~08
Security CLass-Group !
Referred to...-PtanningDepertme~t
Landscape dra~ings
AP # 910-130-022
Ynez Road, 26/,11 (Palm PLaza)
See Apefuture Card for lisp(s)
w m , , m m w m m w w w m m w m m w w w w w w w w w w e w w w m w m m w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w m m w w w w m w w e e w w w
161 0111111991 7~ Administrative Plot PLan Johnson I Johnson DeveLqaent
~ Signage -
Re e-PPA Fi Le Re# # .... -00010O010512 AP # 909-120-0~2-1
Cont- Security CLass-Group ]] Rancho Catlfomia Road, 2g~77
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department
RR!IL~CT...RR051
10/06/1993
City of Teamcuta
Inactive StatuI Lilting
Doc. Item Action
Re#. Date Re#. Taken Brief Description ICeyuords
161 01/14/1991 61 Acintniatrattve PLot PLan Preferred Equities
Rat Type-PPA
Coat -
Exp.-
FiLe Re# # .... -OO0100011X13
Security CLass-Group l
Referred to...-PtanningDepartme~t
Signage
AP#9~0-310-026
Ridge Park Drive, ~3513-&3537
See Aperature Card for
Page 8
09:11:21
161 01/16/1991
Signage
Ret Type-PPA File Ref # .... -000100010~38 AP # 910-120-020
Coat- Security CLass*Group I Jefferson Avenue, 27&52
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptanning Department Unit 7C
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
161 01/15/1991 ~ Aministrative 'PLot PLea PKific Lift & E~itxeent See Aperature Card for 14alXS)
File Re# # .... -000100010~5
Security CLass-Group Z
Referred to...-PLenningDepertemnt
Install above ground tanks
AP # 921-080-039-6
Ynez Road, 26631
Toyota of Tim#cuts
Ret Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100010466 Signage
Coat- Security CLass-Group I AP # 9]1.-320-024-3
Exp.- Referred to...-Planning Department Ynaz Road, 27450
161 01/16/1991 65 Administrative PLot PLan Toyota of Teeecuta t
S i gnage
Rat Type-PPA Fite Re# # .... -000100010450 AP # 921-080-039-6
Coat- Security CLass-Group I Ynez Road, 26631
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptanning Department
161 01/Z~/1991 (~ Administrative PLot PLan Rancho Pacific Sigrage & Gra!~ Land Grant Day#lois#at
The Californian
See Aparature Card for NapCa)
Ret Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100010~72 Signage
Coat- Security CLass-Group Z AP#~21-320-024-3
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptanning Department Ynez Road, 21450
161 01/2]/1991 67 Administrative PLot PLan Rancho Pacific Signage & Graph Land Grant Devet~fxent
NaN York Life
See Aparature Card for Nap(o)
Signage
Ret Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100010~78 AP # 921-690-002-7
Coat- Security CLass-Group i Malls Fargo Bank
Exp.- Referred to .... -PLanning Department Palmr Village Shaping
161 01/2z,/1991 68 Administrative Plot PLan Nine-Tree Signs Center
See Apereture Card for
. , , _ . . . m w . w m . . . . . , . . w m m m e . . m m w m w w w m m m m m w m w m e w e e w w
161 01/24/1991 69 Administrative PLot PLan San Diego Trust & Savings Bank
S i gnage
Ret Type-PPA File Ref # .... -000100010~g3 AP # 910-130-022
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Ynez Road, 2~411 (Palm PLaza)
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning DepartBent See Aperature Card for Naps
w . w w m w w w m w w w w w w w w e m e e e e m w . . . w e e w w w w . . . w w e w . w e w e w ~ w w
Administrative PLot PLan Ken Done Echo Star Satellite
161 01/1A/1991 62 Actminietrative PLot PLan Jeff Hardy& Associates prime Circle
Quner Son Nguyen PLot PLan 116O9
Ret Type-PPA File Ref # .... -QO010001(X31 Landscape PLans See AFirecure Card for Hap(a)
Cent- Security CLue-Group ! APIgOg-Z82-O02
Exp,- Referred to.,,-PianntngDepartment ginchester Road, ge~t of Enter
RRIIIACT...RROS1 City of TeemcaLm Pap 9
10/0~/1~ Inactive Status Listing IX):11:21
Doc. Item Action
Re/'-` Date Re#. Taken Brief Description KeWords
161 01125/1991 70 Administrative PLat PLan Office Furniture Center
Signage
Rat Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100010~g0 AP # 90~-270-271-6
Cont- Security CLams-Group I Enterprise CircLe South, &1625
Exp.- Referred to...-PLenning DepartBent IB-1
Administrative PLot PLan Aprit's Country Nanor
161 01/2511991
Signage
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -0001000104g~ AP # 921-700-007
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Rencho CaLifornia Road, 34150
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department
72 Administrative PLot PLan Pet Center
161 01/25/1991
Signage
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100010508 AP #~0~-270-0&7-0
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Jefferson, 27365
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanningDepartBent
161 0112811991 2 Ackeinistrative 'PLot PLan Vintage HiLLs
Rat Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100010015
Cont- Security CLass-Group I
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptningl)qDertment
16i ~0/1~1 74 Administrative PLot PLan J.C. Penny Stores
Signage
Rat Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100010519 AP # ~0~-240-005-9
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Jefferson, 27435
Exp.- Referred to...-PLsnning Department Vinchester Square
161 01/31/1991 75 Administrative PLot PLan Advanced Cardiovescutor
Rat Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
FiLe Re# # .... -000100010527
Security CLass-Group ]
Referred to...-PLanning Department
HOnor Change/parking Lot
AP # 921-Q80-051
Ynez Road,26351
See Apefuture Card for Nap(s)
161 0210111991 76 Administrative PLot PLan llama Homes Pauba & nargarita Reeds,
Landscape PLans
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100010533 Tract 2413303 paseos (PaLm D
Cont- Security CLass-Group ! eL SoL)
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptanning DepartBent AP # W~-080-010
Southwest Corner
161 0Z/01/1991 77 Administrative PLot PLan Lusardi Construction See Apereture Card for i
Landscape
Ret Type-PPA Fi Le Re#. # .... -000100010538 AP l~01-2~0-036
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Rancho California Road, 29377
Exp.- Referred to...-Planning Department Johnson I Johnson
161 0210511991 70 Administrative PLot PLan Bedford Properties
~ LardscapekterpLan
Ret ~-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100010543 APe ~X)-120-1)38
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Jefferson Avenue & Cherry St.
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department SseAperature Card for Nap(a)
RR I NACT .., RRO51
10/06/1~3
City of l'emecul. a
Irlctive Statu~ Listinl
PIg# 10
: 09:11:21
Doc. ]te~ Action
Re#. Date Re#. Taken Brief Description ICe!Nords
161 02/05/1991 3R~ Administrative PLot PLan Buie
Rat Type-PPA
Cent-
Exp.-
Fiie Re# # .... -000100010609
Security CLass-Group l
Referred to...-Planning Department
Llndsclpirlg
FILE VAS VOIDED BY DEPARTIENT
NO F [ LE DATA F [ LMED
(Getchars)
Rat Type-PPA File Re# # .... -0001000106~ Signage
Cont- Security CLams-Group i AP #
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptlnning DIq=/rtment Rlncho California Rold, 30950
161 02/07/1991
Rat Type-PPA
Cont o
Exp. -
114
Ackninistrative PLot Plan
File Re# # .... -000100010839
Security CLass-Group i
Referred to...-Ptenning Department
Buie Corporation
AP # 9~6-060-010
Rancho Californ Road & Ten Dry
See Aperlture Card for NIp(I)
S~eet Been
Ret Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100010611 Signage
Cont- Security CLass-Group I AP # 921-700-009
Exp.- Referred to...-Pienning Department Rencho California Road, 30950
161 0210711991 80 Ack, insitrative PLot PLan Country Signs & Designs (Palmar Village Center)
See Aperature Card for NIp(s)
161 02/13/1991 81 Administrative PLot PLan Advanced Cardiovascutar
Signage
Rat Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100010617 AP # 921-090-006
Cont- Security CLass-Group Z Ynez Road, 26531
Exp.- Referred to,,,-Ptanning Department
161 02/1Z/1991 86 Administrative PLot PLan Bedford DeveLolaent East of Via Ricct
Approval of Model Site Complex See Aparmture Card for Nap(s)
Ret Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100010650 Tract Z4133-3
Cont- Security CLass-Group ! AP # 9/,6o-080-010
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptenning Department South of Amaritm Vay
161 02/14/1991 83 Administrative Plot Plan Rancho Motor Inn
Signage
Ret Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100010633 AP # 922-120-008-014
Cont- Security CLass-Group ! Frent Street, 28980
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptanning Department
161 02/15/1991 96 Administrative PLot PLan AgLov Studio
Signage
Rat Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100010719 AP # 922-094-002
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Front Street, 28860 C-2
Exp.- Referred to...-PLeoning Departmmlt
w w w w w w w w w m m w w m w w w w w ~ w w w w w w ! . w w w w m w w m w w w w w m w m m m I e
161 02/15/1991 97 Administrative PLot Pten GoLd's Gym
Signage
Ret Type-PPA File Re# # .... -00010001072~, AP # 910-200-Q95-6
Cont- Security CLass-Group ! Ynez Road, 26201
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Departn~q~t See Apefuture Card for Nap(s)
161 02/05/1991 85 Administrative PLot PLan Dick Gardner See Apereture Card for Naps
RRilIACT,,,RRQ51 City of TeeMcaLm P~e 11
10/06/1993 inactive Statue Limitrig 09:11:21
Doc. Item Action
P~/'~ Date Ref. Token Brief DMcription Key~ords
161 02/19/1991 82 Administrative PLot PLan Kindot Cars Luretrig Centers
Rat Type-PPA
Cant -
Exp. -
FiLe Ref ale .... -000100010626
Security CLass-Group J
Referred to...-PLanning DepartBent
Lan~___~ipe PLans
AP ale 921-310-006
Ljndje Lane, 62210
See Apereturs Card for Nap(a)
161 02/20/1991 126 Administrative PLot PLan Fm Fmm Ceedy Store
Rat Type-PPA
Cant -
Exp. -
Fi Le Ref ale .... -000100010901
Security CtMe-Group !
Referred to...-Ptanning Department
Tenant Improvements
AP ale 99~-260-023
Jefferson Avenue, 27537
See Aperoture Card for Nap(e)
161 02/20/1991 88 AdBinistrative PLot PLan Bob Braun
Ret Type-PPA
Cant -
Exp. -
Fi Le eel ale .... -000100010663
securi ty CLass-Group l
Referred to...-PLanning Department
SFR
AP ale 9&5-00~-019
Via BriM,
161 02/21/1991 89 Administrative' PLot PLan Ramhe Pacific Bigrage See AForeLure Card for Nap(o)
& Graphics
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Ref ale .... -000100010670 Signage
Cant- Security CLass-Group I AP ale 921-320-026-3
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning DepartBent Ynez Road, 27650
14 721/1~1 90 Administrative PLot PLan Rancho Pacific Signage
Signage
.eL Type-PPA FiLe fief # .... -000100010675 AP If 921-320-026-3
Cant- Security CLass-Group I Ynez Road, 27650
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department See Apereture Card for Nap(I)
161 02/22/1991 91 Administrative PLot PLan Vinston Tire CoMpany
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
FiLe Ref ale .... -000100010681
Security CLass-Group I
Referred to...-PLenningDepartment
Signage
AP ale
Jefferson Avenue, 27675
161 02/22/19~1 92 Administrative PLot PLan &rchitects Cooebes-14esquita See Aperefute Card for Nap(s)
Bank of Cemerce
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Ref ale .... -000100010690 Landscape
Cant- Security CLass-Group ! AP ale 910-200-058-3
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Dopefret Jefferson Avenue, 27280 &27280
161 02/25/1~1 9/, Administrative PLot Plan Ampec (~onstructien Notor Car Perkuey, 61782
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
FiLe Ref ale .... -000100010704
Security CLass-Group l
Referred to,..-Ptenning Department
Management, Inc.
Temporary Landscape
for temporary parking Lot
AP ale 921-680-002
See Aperature Card for NOp(e)
161 0212711991 93 Administrative PLot PLan Sitverkmod I)evetolxent
/" Landscape & Irrigation PLans
Rs ~-PPA FiLe Ref ale .... -000100010697 AP ale
Coot- Security CLearGroup I Tract Nap 19872-3
Exp.- Referred to...-PLenning DepartBefit See AFeraturs Card for Nap(a)
RRINACT...ItBQ51 City of TeascaLm Page 12
10/06/1993 Inactive Status Listing .. 09:11:21
Dec. Item Action
Ref. Date Ref. Taken Brief Description ICeWords
161 02/2811991 139 Administrative PLot PLan O CLub
Signage
Rat Type-PPA FiLe Ref # .... -OOO100011008 P # 921-050-012
Cent- Security CLasrGroup I Front Street, 27911 #10~
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanntng Dartaunt See AiMfuture Card for Nip(a)
161 02/28/1991 95 Administrative PLot PLan Barrett
Signage
Bet Type-PPA FiLe Ref # .... -000100010710 AP # 911-592-017
Cent- Security CLass-Group I Northvie# Subdivision
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanningDqirtmnt
161 03/0~/1991
Rat Type-PPA
Cent -
Exp. -
Administrative PLot Plan
Ft te Ref # .... -000100010731
Security CLass-Group I
Referred to...-PLanning Department
Nc~Jttjn Cmeu~ittes
NodaL Home SaLes Office
AP #~-&92-02
Corte Nmza, 31812
see dl~erlture Clrd fop NIp(I)
161 0310511991 102 Administrative PLot PLan Nap Foods
S i gnage
Rat Type-PPA Fi Le Ref # .... -000100010757 AP # 910-130-030-1
Cent- Security CLass-Group I PaLe PLaza Shopping Canter
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department
161 03/06/1991 104 Administrative PLot PLan Bedford Devetofxnent See Apereture Card for
Signage
Rat Type-PPA Fite Ref # .... -000100010767 AP # W~6-08-008/9~6-08-007
Cent- Security CLass-Group ! Ped~a & Mergerits Roads
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning DepartBent (Petme Dot Sot)
.......................................................... ~ .......
161 03/08/1991 100 Administrative PLot PLan BC! General Contractors at 14argorite Road
Landscape PLans See Aperature card for Nap(a)
Rat Type-PPA FiLe Ref # .... -000100010747 PLot PLan 10739
Cent- Security CLass-Group ! AP de 921-250-018
Exp.- Referred to...-PLenning DepartBefit Rencho CaLifornia Road
161 03/08/1991 101 Administrative PLot PLan Country Signs & Designs
Signage
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Ref de .... -000100010751 AP de 909-270-016-2
Cent- Security CLass-Group I Courtesy Escro~
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning DepartBent See Apermture Card for Nap(e)
161 0311111991 141 Administrative PLot PLan cat Spas
Signage
Rat Type-PPA Fit# Ref # .... -000100011020 AP # 910-130-132-3
Cent- Security CLass-Group ! ginchester Road, 27452
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptennjng Department See Apereture Card for Nap(a)
161 03/13/1991 103 Administrative PLot PLan Precision Sign Group See Aperefute Card for Nap(s)
Nissan ~"
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Ref de .... -000100010764 Signage ;
Cent- Security CLass-Group I AP de 921-68o-0o9-3
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptmnning Department Motorcar Parkely, 41895
RRINACT...RR051 City of TemecuLa Page 13
10/06/lW3 inactive STatUS Listing : 0~:11:21
Doc,
161 03/14/1991
Ret Type-PPA
Cont -
Exp.-
]tern Action
Date Re#. Taken Brief Description Keyverde
105 Administrative PLot PLan HuMre Nanis
Signage
FiLe Re# # .... -000100010773 AP # 910-1~0-0~0-1
Security CLass-Group [ Ynez Road, 2~451 , #19-B
Referred to...-PLanning Department See Apefuture Card of Nap(s)
161 05/14/1~1 106 Administrative PLot PLan Fashion Land
Signage
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -00010001077~ AP # 910-130-030-1
Cant- Security CLass-Group I Ynez Road, 2d435 Suite 1S-A
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department See Aperature Card for Naps
161 05/14/1~1 107 Administrative PLot PLan Discount Vine OutLet
Signage
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -00010001078~ AP #
Cant- Security CLass-Group i Enterprise CircLe North, 41d~2
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanningDepertment See AperatureCard forM(s)
. w . w . w . m . m , . m w w m . . . w w w w ~m m w w w w . e w w w . w w m w m
161 03/14/1~1 108 Administrative PLot PLan A & A Sign
Signage
Ret Type-PPA Fit# Re# # .... -0001000107~3 AP #
Cant- Security CLass-Group I Jefferson Avenue, 274~5
Exp.- Referred to...-PLenning Department (Sun City OpticaL)
109 Administrative PLot PLan ProsLay of San Diego See Aperature Card for Nap(s)
Hearths#de
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100010801 NodaL H~mes Lots 33 - 37
Cant- Security CLass-Group I AP # 926-160-066
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department 79 South
m w m , , , . m . w m . m w w w e m w m m m m m m . . m . . w m . w m m m m
110 Administrative PLot PLan Robert
161 03/15/1~91
SFR
eel Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100010816 AP # 9~5-130-007-5
Cant- Security CLass-Group I Vindcrest Lane, 438/,0
Exp.- Referred to...-Pkanning DepartBent See Aperature Card for Map(s)
111 Administrative PLot PLan County Signs & Designs
161 03/19/1991
Signage
Ret Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100010824 AP # 901-130-022
Cant- Security CLass-Group ! Ynez Road, 26~91
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning DepartBent See Aperature Card for Nap(e)
161 03/20/1~1 112 Administrative PLot PLan $5/CLothing Store See Aperature Card for Nap(s)
Signage
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Ref # .... -000100010829 AP # 910-130-030
Cant- Security CLass-Group i Ynez Road, 26~39 A
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department PaLe PLaza Center
161 05/20/1~1 113 Administrative PLot PLan Van De#to Day#to#sent See Aparature Card for Nap(s)
~ Tract 22627
Re ~e-PPA Fite Re# # .... -00010001083~ Set Back Check
Cant- Security CLass-Group I AP# 919-350-048
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptanning Department ginchelter/Nicotee loads
RRINACT...RRO51 City of TeemcuLl Page t/,
10/06/1~ Inactive Status Listing : 09:11:21
Doc. item Action
Re#. Dote Re#. Taken Brief Description Ke!mords ~
161 03/21/1991
Bet Type-PPA
Cont -
FXpoo
115
Administrative PLot PLan
FiLe eel # .... -0001000108&7
Security CLass-Group I
Referred to...-Ptennjng Department
Prestey of San Diego
NodaL liQme CompLex
AP # 926-160-QO Ho6
Corte Carol inn
See Apereture Card for Nap(s)
161 03/25/1991 116 Administrative PLot PLan S5 CLothing Store
Signage
Rat Type-PPA FiLe Ref # .... -000100010853 AP# 910-130-0~0-1
Cont- Security CLass-Group i Ynez Road, 2~39 #16-A
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptannjng Department PaLm PLaza
117 Administrative PLot PLan Outdoor Media Group
161 03/25/1~1
State Farm Insurance
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100010858 Signage
Cont- Security CLass-Group I AP # ~/~,-2~)*002
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department Rancho CaLifornia, 29377
161 03/27/1F)1 120 Administrative PLot PLan Nobit OiL Corporation
Signage
Bet Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100010874 AP # 922-210-0/,1
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Bedford Court,/~520
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department See Aperature Card for leap(o)
161 03127119~1 121 Administrative PLot PLan MobiL OiL Corporation
Landscape & irrigation
Rat Type-PPA Fi Le Re# # .... -000100010880 AP # 922-210-0/,1
Cont- Security CLass-Group Z Bedford Court,
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department See Aperature Card for Nap(I)
161 03/29/1~1 118 Administrative PLot PLan Steve Hatch
SFR
Rat Type-PPA Fit# Re# # .... -000100010865 AP # ~/,5-130-008-6
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Jeramie Court,
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptenning Department Los Ranchitol
See Aperature Card for Nap(s)
161 03/2~/1991 119 Administrative PLot PLan ~ntegre Signs Inc.
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
161 04/02/1~1
Ret Type-PPA
Cont o
Exp, -
FiLe Re# # .... -000100010870
Security Ctass-Groq~ [
Referred to...-PtmnnjngDepartment
Signage
AP # 910-130-022
See Aperature Card for Nap(s)
122 Administrative PLot PLan
FiLe Re# # .... -OQQ1QQO10885
Security CLass-Group I
Referred to...-PLenningDepartnent
Rancho Core Associate#
Signage
AP # 909-120-024-5
Diaz & Winchester Roads (Crnr)
See AperetureCard for Nap(s)
161 04/0~/1991 123 Administrative PLot PLan ReaLty Vortd See Aperoture Card for Nap(s)
Signage ~
Rat Type-PPA Fite Ref # .... -000100010893 AP # 921-700-008-$ /
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Rancho CaLifornia Road, 30630
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department 1503
RRINACT...RRO51 City of TamecaLm Page 15
10/06/1993 znective status LiBtime -. Qg:lh21
Doc. Item Action
Rf/'' Date Re#. Token Brief Description ICeyuords
161 04/04/1991 125 Administrative PLot PLan Terraton Corporation
Signage
Ret Type-PPA Fi Le Re# # .... -000100010906 AP # 922-210-042
Cant- Security CLaim-Group I Bedford Court
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Dopetruant See Apereturn Card for lisp(a)
161 0410/,/1991 128 Administrative PLot PLan Foot Locker
Sjgrige
met Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -QOO1QQO10927 AP # 910-130-030
Cant- Security CLaim-Group i Ynez toad, 2~31 Suite A
Exp.- Referred to...-PLmnning Department (PaLm PLan)
161 04/05/1991 126 Administrative PLot PLan Country Sip & kip
Rat 'Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
Fite Re# # .... -000100010915
Security CLass-Group I
Referred to...-PLanning Department
Signage
AP # 909-270-002-9
See Apereturn Card for IMp(a)
161 04/05/1991 127 Administrative PLot PLan KmJf. ee & Bred
Ret Type-PPA
Cant -
Exp. -
FiLe Re# # .... -000100010919
Security CLass-Group
Referred to...-PtmmingDepartment
Landscape& Street Tree
AP # 918-293-007
PaLe Road & Via Gjtberto Roads
See Aperature Card for ~
16 /05/1991 131 Administrative PLot PLan San Pedro Sign Baskin Robbins
Signage
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100010951 AP # 910-130-030
Cant- Security CLass-Group I Ynez Road, 26~91
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptanning Depirtment PaLm PLaza
See Aperature Card for Nap(a)
161 0~/10/1991 129 Administrative PLot PLan KaufBen & Broad Zuna Drive
Landscape Ptar4 for
Re~ Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100010935 SaLes TraiLer
Cant- Security CLass-Group I AP # 918-)6)-013-2/918-)6)-014
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptanning Department -3
See Aperature Card for leap(s)
161 04/11/1991 130 Administrative PLot PLan Lucia Systems
Rat Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
FiLe Re# # .... -00010001C)9~5
Security CLass-Group i
Referred to...-PLmnning Department
Tenant Improvements
AP # 921-400-043-7
Camfierce Center Drive. 27610
See Aperature Card for NapCs)
161 04/15/1991 159 Administrative PLot PLan ~eLts, Cyril George
Signage
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100011153 AP # 910-130-030
Cant- Security CLais-Group I PaLm PLaza
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department Tuxedo Shop
161 0411711991 132 Administrative PLot PLan Lyon Communities y Road
~" Landscape PIers See Apefuture Card for Nap(e)
ne~. e-PPA FiLe eel # .... -000100010956 AP #
Co~t- Security CLass-Group Z Tract # 226~1-1
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptinning Dep~rtment Nicotes & North lenerlL Kemrne
RRIIL~CT...RR051
10/06/1993
City of TemecuLa
Inactive-Statue Listing
Page 16
99:11:21
Doc. item Action
Be#. Date Re#. Taken Brief Description Keyaords
161 04/17/1991 133 AdBinistrotive PLot PLane G8 Foods
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
Fi Le Re# # .... -000100010~1
Security CLass-Group I
Referred to...-Ptanning DartBent
Parking Requirements
AP#
Rancho California Road, 30~80
See Aperature Card for Nap(a)
Signage
Rat Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100011260 AP # 910-130-030
Cant- Security CLass-Group I Ynez Road, 26659 Suite 19-E
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Delparteent (PiLe PLaza)
161 06/22/1991
Rat Type-PPA
Conto
Exp,-
Administrative PLot PLan
File Re# # .... -000100010~70
Security CLass-Group I
Referred to,,,-PLanning Department
BedfordDeveLopment-
Signage
API966-O8-OOBIg&6-08-O07
Santiago & Narprjto Roads
Sen Aperature Card for llp(I)
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
161 04/26/19ql 160 Administrative Plot Plan ShoeLand
Signage
Rat Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100011016 AP # 921-)20-00~-0~
Cant- Security CLass-Group I Rancho California, 2~588 K-11
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Departmt See Aperature Card for Nap(a)
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
161 04/22/1991 135 Administrative PLot PLan Bedford Devetolxnent Santiago & Harprite Roads
Patone Oet Sot See A~oerature Card for tllp(I)
Ret Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100010979 DirectionaL Signs
Cant- Security CLass-Group i AP # ~6-08-OQB,OO&,OOT, QQ5
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptenntng DepartBent Peuba & Harprite Roads
161 04/22/1991 136 Administrative PLot PLan Hank's Hardware ,
File Re# # .... -000100010984
Security CLass-Group !
Referred to...-PLanningDepartme~t
Signage
AP #~0~-270-008-5
Enterprise Circle South, 61770
See Aperature Card for Nap(s)
161 04/25/1991 137 Administrative PLot PLan Unocat Company
FiLe Ref # .... -000100010993
Security CLass-Group I
Referr~ to...-PLami~ Delartm~mt
Signage
AP # 9210680-006
Ynaz Road and Solarm May
See Aperature Card for leap(s)
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
161 04/25/19~1 138 Administrative PLot PLan UnoceL
File Re# # .... -000100011002
Security CLass-Group I
Referred to,,,-PLanning Department
Landscape PLans
AP # 921-680-006
SotanaWayandYnaz Roads
See Aperature Card for NapCs)
161 04/30/1991 162 Administrative PLot PLan Phil CoLumbo
Signage ~
Rat Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100011025 AP # 922-072-010-1
Cant- Security CLass-Group ! Front Street South, 2~)0
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanntng DepartBent Suite A
161 04/17/1991 171 Administrative PLot PLan Ron J~hrmm Garden Path FLoraL
RRINACT...RR051 City of TemecuLm Page 17
10/06/1FFJ Inactive Status Listing : 0~:11:21
Doc.
161 05/02/1991
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
item Action
Date Re#. Taken Brief Description lieWords
152 Administrative PLot PLan Peter Pecitto
SFR
FiLe Be# # .... -0001000110~ AP # ~5-171)-007
Security CLass-Group ! Ynez Road, 2908~
Referred to...-PLanning DeFerlt Bee Aperefute Card for Nap(I)
161 05/06/1F)1 I~ Adeiniatrative PLot PLan The Fumy Fern
Rat Type-PPA
Coat -
Exp. -
FiLe Re# # .... -000100011065
Security CLass-Group i
Referred to...-Pkanning Depertaent
Signage
AP #
Jefferson Avenue, 27537
See Aperaturs Card for Map(a)
161 05/0711991 14) Administrative PLot PLan Brencla WahLerr
Signage
Bet Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -00010001103) AP # 921-170-001
Cont- Security CLass-Group Z Rencho CaLifornia & 14arearite
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning DepartBent Roads
161 05/08/1991 1/.4 Administrative PLot PLan Themes Sign Service
The Green Burrito
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100011050 Signage
Cent- Security CLass-Group] AP #
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department PaLmmr ViLLage
16i '09/1~1 1/.5 Administrative PLot PLan g.D. Brooks Insurance
Signage
Rat Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100011061 AP #
Cent- Security CLass-Group I Winchester Road,/.1953
Exp.- Referred to...-Planning Department See Aperature Card for Map(l)
161 05/09/1~1 1/,7 Administrative PLot PLan Bedford Devetolxent
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
FiLe Re# # .... -000100011069
Security CLass-Group ]
Referred to...-Ptennjng Department
Tract 241)4 F/2413/* 3
Recreation PLans
AP # 9/,6-080-007/006
161 05/20/1~1 148 Administrative PLot Plan Cotboum Curtier NoLL
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
FiLe Re# # .... -000100011075
Security CLass-Group i
Referred to...-Ptanning Department
Landscape Reviev
AP #921-080-054
Ynez Road and Sotam Way
161 05/20/1~1 1/.9 Administrative PLot PLan JVL le-nmgawmnt See Aperature Card for leeKs)
Signage
Rat Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100011082 AP # 909-281-013
Cont- Security CLass-Group ! Jefferson & Winchester Road
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department Richies Diner
161 05/2/,/1991 150 Administrative PLot PLan InLand VaLLey CabLevision
~' Signage
Ret :-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100011087 AP # 910-130-030
Cont- Security CLass-Group Z Ynez Road, 26/,59 Suite C
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department See Aperefute Card for Nip(e)
RRINACT.,.RR051 City of TwnecuLa Page 18
10/06/1993 Inactive Statue Listing -. 0~:11:21
Doc. Item Action
Re#. Date Re#. Taken Brief Description ICey~mrds ~
161 05/2471991 151 Administrative PLot PLan Mindsor Ilouling, [nc. See Aperlture Card for NIp(I)
DenaLaN c lies
Ret Type-PPA FILe Re# # .... -0001000110~2 SFR
Coot- Security CLass-Group i AP # 919-2~2-006
Exp.- Referred to...-PLenningDeparment CorTe Sonora, 31677
161 05/2~/1F)1 153 Administrative PLot PLan CharLes I. leitich
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
FiLe Re# # .... -000100011106
Security CLass-Group I
Referred to...-PLanning Department
Occ, r-~cy Pemi C
VaLley Best Teen Dance Club
AP #
Front Street,
161 05/30/1F)1 155 Acbninistrative PLo! Plan Crazy Jss PIzzl
Rat Type-PPA
Cont -
Exp. -
FiLe Re# # .... -000100011122
Security CLass-Group l
Referred to...-PLanningDepertfent
Signage
AP #~21-320-38~
Ynez Road, 27~z~
161 05/30/1991 1(x1 Administrative PLot PLan Herron & Romansoff Architects Sanborn Avenue,
inc,
Rat Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100011180 Landscape PLan PP IE17
Coat- Security CLass-Group i llicrnage
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department AP # 910-200-088
Perky#st
See Apereture Card for leaFKs)
161 05~1/1991 154 Administrative PLot PLan Paul HeaLy See Apereture Card for
Signage
Rat Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100011116 AP #
Coat- Security CLass-Group I CarsHay, 29612
Exp.- Referred to...-Pksnning Department ViLLa DeL leer
161 05/31/1991 156 Administrative PLot PLan Bedford Properties
S i gnage
Rat Type-PPA Fi Le Re# # .... -0001000111)0 AP # 910-1)0-002
Coat- Security CLass-Group I Ynez Road, 2&/,59 Suite ILl - B
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department (PaLm PLaza)
Bridal Shop
161 06/05/1991 157 Administrative PLot PLan Lenny Pechner
SFR
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100011138 AP # 945-060-016
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Sanitego Road, )0992
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department See Apereture Card for leap(s)
161 06/07/1991 158 Administrative Plot Plan. Larry GabetLe
Signegg
Ret Type-PPA Fit# Re# # .... -000100011145 AP # 921-080-(~0-6
Coat- Security (tess-Group I Ynez Road, Vest Side
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptanning Department North of Sotsre Hay
See AFerature Card for leap(s)
w , , w w w w , , w m m m w w w w w e w e e m w w w w w w e w e e m m w m w w w w e e e e w w e w m m w e e w m e e w m w w e w e e
161 06/10/1991 16z, Administrative PLot PLan Paradise ChevroLet See Aperature Card for leap(s)
Landscape & Irrigation
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -00010001118~ AP # ~21-080-014, 017, 018
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Ynez Road, Vest Side
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptanning Deartent South of Sotsre Vay
RRINACT...RR051 City of TemecuLm Page 19
lo/o6/1993 Inactive status Listing : 09:n-.~l
161 06/11/1991
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
Item Action
Date Re#. Token Brief Description Keln~rds
160 Administrative PLot PLan ComnerciaL Lighting Services See Aperature Card for Nap(a)
VindshieLds of Maria
File Ref # .... -OQQ1OQQ1116Q Signage
Security CLmaa-Group ! AP # 921-~aQ-Q~2-4
Referred to,..-PL~nning Department Camarc# Center Drive, 27516
161 Administrative PL~t PLan Federal Sign See AlarmLure Card for Nap(e)
161 0~/12/1991
Signage
Rat Type-PPA File Re# # .... -0001000111~1 AP # ;-282-001-5
Cont- Security CLass-Group ] iNnchester Road, 41615
Exp.- Referred to...-Pianning Department TaBscala V~Liey Bank
161 0611311991 162 Administrative PLot PLan Bedford Properties -
Signage
Ret Type-PPA File Ref # .... -000100011173 AP # 910-1:50-002
toni- Security CLass-Group ] Ynez Road, 24~8~ Suite ~ - A
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Defertruant IBpressions Salon
161 I)6/20/1991 165 Administrative PLot PLan Norage PLea
Signage
Ret Type-PPA File Re# # .... -00010001119/, AP # FZ1-310-OO&
Cont- Security CLass-Group % Rancho California Road,
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning DepartBent
16 '2011991 1~ Administrative PLot PLan CarLos Cazares The Couch Clxll~lny
Signage
Ret Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100011206 AP # ~21-4~0-058
Cont- Security CLass-Group ! Jefferson Avenue, 27645
Exp.- Referred to...-PLaoning DepartBent Suite 112
See Aperature Card for lisp(s)
161 06/21/1;91 167 Administrative PLot PLan Kaufman & Broad of San Diego
Catifomia Breeze
Ret Type-PPA File Ref # .... -00010001212 Nodal Home Complex for
toni- Security CLass-Group i Subdivision
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptmnning Department AP # 918-~-010
Palm Road and Vim Gftberto
Tract No. 19872-4
SmLes Trailer
See Aperefute Card for Nap(I)
161 06/25/1991 169 Administrative PLot PLan Rancho Pet Center See Aperature Card for NapEs)
Signage
Ret Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100011224 AP # ~21-700-011
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Rancho California Road,
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptanning Dep~rtme~t Petomar Village Center
161 0&127/1991
Rat Type-PPA
Exp. -
Administrmtive PLot Plan
File Re# # .... -000100011218
Security CLass-Group ]
Referred to...-PLanning Department
Charles Nguyen
Restaurant with/Retail Canter
AP #gQg-ZTO-O~'5
Viacheater Road, 4154O
(~rLying PP/9974)
See Aperotate Card for Nap(a)
w m m w w w m m w m e m w w w m w w m w w w w m w w w w w
161 07/01/1991 173 Administrative PLot PLan Ed Duff#she 14inistries See Aperature Card for 14apes)
/' Bigrage
Re~ a-PPA File Re# # .... -000100011255 AP #
Cont- Security CLass-Group ! Enterprise Circle North
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptanning Department 41743, Suite 101
RRiNACT...RR051
10/06/1993
City of TemecuLe
inactive Status Listing
Page 20
: 09:11:21
Dec. item Action
Re#. Bate Re#. Taken Brief Description Keywords
161 0710211991 170 Administrative PLot PLan Bancho Calmunity Church
Rat Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
Fi Le Re# # .... -000100011Z32
Security CLass*Group !
Referred to...-PLanning Department
Landscape PLan
AP # 922-170-010
VeLlejo Avenue, 29141
See Aperefute Card for Nap
161 07/Q5/1991 172 Administrative PLot plan The Bail Bouttque
S i gauge
Rat Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100011252 AP it 922-021-002-6
Cent- Security CLass-Group I Front Street, 28/,10
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Bapertmant See Apereture Card for Map(e)
161 07/08/1991 174 Ackninistrative Plot Plan Advance Signs See Apefuture Card for Nap(a)
Signage
Rat Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100011261 AP # 94~-060-008-3
Cent- Security CLass-Group i Jefferson Avenue, 27452
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning DepartBent Budget Rant A Car
161 07/08/1991 175 Administrative' PLot PLan Phi L Colombo
Signage
Ret Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100011266 AP it 922-072-0101
Cent- Security CLass-Group i Front Street, 29000 iA
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department CoLombo's Cafe &Bakery
161 07/08/1991 176 Administrative PLot PLan Palm PLaza Dental
Signage
Rat Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100011272 AP # 910-130-022-4
Cent- Security CLass-Group I Ynaz Road, 26~75
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department See Aperature Card for NapCa)
161 07/17/1991 178 Administrative PLot PLan Enterprise Rent-A-Car
Certificate of Occupancy
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100011288 AP #
Cent- Security CLass-Group I Ynaz Road, 27468 Unit 8-1
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department
161 07717/1991 179 Administrative PLot PLan Voided
Ret Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100011297
Cent- Security CLass-Group l
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department
161 07118/1991 180 Administrative PLot PLan Tricia PinkeLLa
Signage
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100011298 AP #
Cent- Security CLass-Group I Via MontezuM, 28720
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department Pinky:s Bar & Grill
Pinky's Bail
161 07/2271991 181 Administrative PLot PLan James English See Aperature Card for Nap(a)
Tenant ImproveBefit ~
Ret Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100011313 AP # /
Cent- Security Ctasa-Groupl Ynaz Road, 27476
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department Boll Idaevil
RRINACT...RRO51 City of TwaecuLe Page 21
10/06/1993 ]natLive Status Listing : 09:11:21
Dec. Item Action
Rf/''' Date Ref. Tekon Brief Description Keyaords
161 07/26/1991 182 Administrative PLot Pile Hartha Ann ILltart Strut Yet Stuff
Tenant Improvements
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Ref # .... -000100011318 AP #
Cent- Security CLass-Group I Ynez Road, 27(G7 L7-220
Exp.- Referred to., .-PLanning DeFertaint ParCrest PLaza
See Apefuture Card for Hap(s)
161 07/30/1991 183 Administrative PLot PLan HerriLL Lynch
Signage
Rat Type-PPA FiLe Bet # .... -00010001132~ AP #
Cent- Security CLeae-Group ] Front Street, 277/0
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptlnning DeFertint See Airattire Card for NIp(l)
161 07/30/1991 18~ Achiniatrative PLot PLan Bedford Properties
Landscape Bevieu
Rat Type-PPA FiLe Ref # .... -000100011:[31 AP #
Cent- Security CLass-Group I Hargerito and Manchester Roads
Exp.- Referred to...-PLennjng Department Coerce
See Airature Card for HaG(o)
161 07/31/1991 185 Administrative PLot PLan Heath CcaKl~ See Airature Card for Hap(o)
Signage
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Ref # .... -0001000113~1 AP #
Cent- Security CLass-Group i Ynaz Road, 26779
Exp.- Referred to...-PtarmingDepartBent TemecuLaHazda
16 /05/1991 186 Administrative PLot PLan Cater FamiLy Enterprises Suite K, blinchoster PLaza
Spas
Rat Type-PPA FiLe Ref # .... -000100011]57 Signage
Cent- Security CLass-Group ] AP #
Exp.- Referred to...*Ptaming DepartBent Jefferson Avenue, 27315
161 08/08/1991 187 Administrative PLot PLan VaLLey Seat
Young AduLt Night CLub
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Ref # .... -0001000111:366 Signage
Cent- Security CLass-Group ] AP #
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department Front Street, 28822
161 08/08/1991 188 Administrative PLot PLan 14utual Aid See Airatufe Card for Hap(I)
A CaLifornia Partnership
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Ref # .... -000100011316 SFR
Cent- Security CLass-Group i AP # 965-070-015-7
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning DepartBefit She#aLter Road, ~T~85
161 08/08/1991 190 Administrative PLot PLan PresLey of San Diego
HodeL Homes
Ret Type-PPA FiLe lef # .... -000100011390 Landscape and Irrigation
Cent- Security CLass-Group ] AP # 926-160-0046
Exp.- Referred to...-Plaming Department Highamy 79 South
161 08/09/1991 189 Administrative PLot PLan Houard Yu See Airature Card for Hap(o)
~ Restaurant Improvements
Re~ i-PPA FiLe Ref # .... -000100011)85 AP # 921-250-070
Cent- Security CLosE-Group I Rancho CaLifornia Road, 30520
Exp.- Referred to...-PLeming DepartBent Suite AlOl & A 102
RRINACT...RRQ51 City of TeeecuLs Pegs 22
10/06/1993 inactive Status Listing : 09:11:21
Doc. Item Action
Ref. Date Ref. Taken Brief Description Keywords
161 08/09/1991 193 Administrative PLot PLm fir. Tint
Signage
Rat Type-PPA Fite Ref # .... -000100011618 AP # 922-09-300-30
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Front Street, 28822 Suite 108
Exp.- Referred to,..-PLenning DeFerlt See Apereture Card for Nap(I)
161 0811211991 198 Administrative PLot PLan LaeTq3ost Pizza
Signage
Bet Type-PPA FiLe eef # .... -000100011~9 AP #
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Rancho CaLifornia Road, 2976O
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning DepartBent betasen Lyedie Lena
and Morege Road
See Apermture Card for Nap(e)
161 08/13/1991 192 Administrative PLot PLan Lee Kmsheere
Signage
Rat Type-PPA FiLe Ref # .... -000100011601 AP # 922-110-006-5
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Front Street, 29115
Exp.- Referred to...-PLenning Department Creekside Texaco
See Aloerature Card for Nap(l)
161 08/1611991 191 Administrative PLot PLan Lyon Coemunitlee North General Ks#me/end
Reverse PLotting
Bet Type-PPA FiLe Ref # .... -000100011395 Lots ~3, 7~ & 80
Cent- Security CLass-Group i AP #
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Deparment Tract # 22627-1
NicoLss Road
See Apermture Card forls)
161 08120/1991 197 Administrative PLot PLan Susan Li._n--k~-~_,ist bet~en Peaix Red
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
FiLe Ref # .... -000100011~42
Security CLass-Group %
Referred to...-PLanningDeparment
Lendscepe. PLmnAl:provsL
Tract 22916 Rec BuiLding
AP #
Needcads Park#y, mt side
and Rsncho Vista Red
See Apersture Card for Nap(a)
161 08/23/1991 225 Administrative PLot PLan Bedford DeveLolxent 4, & 015 .-
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp,-
FiLe Ref # .... -000100011659
Security CLass-Group 1
Referred to...-PtanningDepartment
Tract 24133
Streetscape Landscape
e, Irrigation, PLanting PLans
AP #966-080-011,012, 013, 01
Amarjta Way & Nontetegro
161 08/23/1~1 226 Administrative PLat PLan Bedford DeveLopmmt 4, 015
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
FiLe Ref # .... -0001000116(x~
Security CLass-Group l
Referred to...-Ptmnning DepartBent
Tract 24133
Paseo Landscape, irrigation&
planting
AP # 966-080-011, 012, 013, 01
Tract 24133 1,2,3,4
,5,F
See Apereture Card for Nap(s)
161 08/27/1~1 1~ Administrative PLot PLan VaLLey Medical PLaza
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
FiLe Ref # .... -00010001165~
Security CLass-Group 1
Referred to...-PLanning Department
Umtts/Signage
AP # 921-680-059
Jefferson Averse, 27699
161 08/2~/1~1 202 Administrative PLot PLan Strut Yer Stuff
Signage
Rat Type-PPA FiLe Ref # .... -000100011673 AP # 922-210-(X5-9
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Bedford Court, 4j~535
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptmnning Department ParCrest PLaza
IIRIMACT...RR051 City of TeBmcuLa Page 23
10106/1993 Inactive Status Listing 09.'11:21
161 08/30/1991
Rat Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
]tea Action
Date Re#. Taken Brief Description Kelmords
200 Admtniatrative PLot PLan Bob Gregory
File Re# # .... -OOO10O01146O AP # 921-080-0t~
Security CLass-Group ! ~Leck Ynez Road, 27000
Referred to...-PLanning Department Paradise Chevrolet
161 09/05/1~91 201 Aminietretive PLot PLan H & H Craft & FLoral
Signage
Rat Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100011666 AP # 910-1)0-030
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Vinchester & Ynez Roads
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanningDepertment Palm PLaza
203 Administrative PLot PLan Daniel ALLon
161 09/06/1991
Creative Designs
Rat Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100011~7V Signage
Cont- Security CLass-Group I AP # ~21-050-018
Exp.- Referred to.,.-Ptanning Delxrtmmnt DeL Rio Road, 27860
161 09/10/1991 206 Administrative PLot PLan Johnson & Johnson DeveLqaent
Signage
eel Type-PPA File Ref # .... -000100011&87 AP #
Cont- Security CLass-Group i Ynez Road, 27~50
Exp.- Referred to...-PLannine DelartBent
1~ '/16/1991 206 Administrative PLot PLan PresLey of Sen Diego
Tract
Rat Type-PPA File Re# # .... -000100011~99 Recretion PLan
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Highkey 79 South
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning DepartBent See Aperefute Card for
161 0~/16/19r)1 207 Administrative PLot PLan Prestey of San Diego
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
File Re# # .... -000100011508
Security CLass-Group
Referred to...-PLanningDepartment
Tract 26861
Landscape& irrigation PLan
Highusy79South
See Apereture card for Nap(s)
161 0~/17/1~)1 208 Administrative Plot PLan PrecLey of San Diego
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
File Re# # .... -000100011515
Security CLass-Group 1
Referred to...-PLanning Department
Tract ~_A86__1
Nodal Landscaping PLans
HighHay 79 South
See Aparature Card for llspCa)
161 0~/17/1~1 209 Administrative PLot PLan Commercial Lighting Services
Signage
Ret Type-PPA File Re# # .... -00010001152~ AP # 921-/kB0-012
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Commerce Center Drive, 27516
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptanning DepartBent Vindshietds of America
161 09/18/1~1 210 Administrative PLot PLan Harcie Curby See Apareture Card for Hap(a)
/-- Signage
Re ~-PPA File Re# # .... -000100011530 AP # 922-0/~-007
Cont- Security CLass-Group I Main Street, ~1f71
Exp.- Referred to...-Planning Department Designers Cut ]! Hair Salon
RRINACT...RR051 City of TeLl Page 24
10/06/1993 inactive Status Listing .. 09:11:21
Doc. %tern Action
Re#. Date Re#. Taken Brief Description ICeyvords ~
161 09/19/1991
Rat Type-PPA
Cont -
Exp. -
216 Administrative PLot PLan
FiLe Re# # .... -000100011580
Security CLass-Group !
Referred to,..-PLanningDepartment
Bernard Karcher investments
Landscape and Irrigation PLans
AP#921-250-18
Rm~.ho Catifomia Road, 20660
See Aperature Card for Hap(s)
161 09/20/1991
Rat Type-PPA
· Pont-
Expoo
211
Administrative PLot PLan
FiLe Re# # .... -000100011537
Security CLams-Group
Referred to...-PtsnningDepartment
Primadonna:m Restaurant
Singe
AP#909-270-0~7-0
Jefferson Avenue, 27345
See Aperature Card for Hap(s)
161 0~/20/1991 212 Administrative PLot PLan Nisssn of Tam#cute
Signage
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100011550 AP i921-680-009-3
Coat- Security CLass-Group I Notorcar Perkk~y, &1895
Exp.- Referred to...-PLanning Department See AFarsLurs Card for Nap(s)
161 09/20/1991 213 Acininistrotive PLot PLan Jimm/,s Coffee House
Signage
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100011557 AP # 921-320-009-0
Coat- Security CLass-Group [ Ynaz Road, 2754/,
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptanning Department See Aperature Card for Nap(e)
S i gnage
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100011575 AP #
Coat- Security CLass-Group i Jefferson Avenue, 27&70
Exp.- Referred to...-Planning Department See Aperature Card for Hap(s)
161 09/24/1991
Ret Type-PPA
Coat -
Exp. -
223
Administrative PLot PLan
FiLe Re# # .... -000100011645
Security CLass-Group I
Referred to...-PLanning Department
Country Signs & Designs
Signage
AP #909-120-034-6
Enterprise CircLe, 61625
See Apereture Card for Hap(e)
161 09/25/1991
Rat Type-PPA
Exp.-
217
Administrative PLot Plan
FiLe Re# # .... -000100011587
Security CLass-Group [
Referred to...-PtanningDepartment
Quiet Bros. ELectric Sign
Signage
AP # 909-282-001e
Winchester Road, 61615
See Aperature Card for Hap(s)
161 09/26/1991 205 Administrative PLot PLan King Sign Con any
Signage
Rat Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100011692 AP # 909-270-020-5
Cont- Security CLass-Group i Winchester & Jefferson Roads
Exp.- Referred to...-Ptsnning Department Teecuts Furniture Hart
161 09/27/1991 218 Administrative PLot PLan Ad-Art Signs, Inc. See Aperature Card for Hap(s)
Signage "'
Ret Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -0001000115W, AP # 910-130-030 ,'
Coat- Security CLass-Group ] Ynez Road, K-Hart
Exp.- Referred to...-Priming Departtent PaLm PLaza
RRINACT...RR051 City of TeeecuLa Page 25
10/06/1993 ]rective Status Listing : 09:11:21
Doc. ! ten Act i on
Re~ Date Re#. Taken Brief Description Key~ords
1~1 0~/27/1991 219 Administrative PLot PLan C*Tedeschi
Rat Type-PPA
Cont-
FiLe Re# # .... -000100011610
Security CLose-Group
Referred to...-PLenningDelartBent
Signage
AP #
Enterprise CircLe Wit, 27688
161 0~/)0/1991 220 Administrative PLot PLan Bottlaevit
Signage
Bet Type-PPA FiLe Re# # .... -000100011616 AP # 921-320-025-&
Cont- Security CLose-Group I Ynez load, 27476 Suite N
Exp.- Referred to...-PLmnning DepartBent See/qoerlture Card for Nap(a)
161 09/30/1991 221 Administrative PLot PLan Matt Street Property hapmy i911-170-017
Rat Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
FiLe Re# # .... -000100011624
Security CLass-Group ]
Referred to...-PLonning Department
Bancho ToerlaeldComtry
Shopping Center
AP # 911-150-027,026,029
i911-1(~0-027,02~
e919-350-053
see Apereture Card for Nap(s)
161 10/01/1991 235 Administrative PLot PLan Void
Ret Type-PPA
Cont-
Exp.-
FiLe Re# # .... -
Security CLass-
Referred to..-.-PLanningDepmrtment
220 Records Processed
ITEM NO. 10
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Manager/City Council
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
October 26, 1993
SUBJECT:
Contract Amendment No. I to Professional Services Contracts for Civil
Engineering, Land Surveying, Structural Engineering, and Soils Testing -
Liefer Road Crossing (PW93-02)
PREPARED BY:~Jim D. Faul, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve Contract Amendment No. I to provide additional structural
engineering services for Liefer Road Crossing by McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc. in the
amount of $3,000.00.
BACKGROUND:
The extra work is required to design the reconstruction of the existing 12" water line in Liefer
Road. During the coordination process with the utility companies serving the affected property
owners, it was determined that the preservation and future maintenance of this water line
would be better served by attaching it to the bridge rather than attempting to protect it in
place. In addition, a portion of the extra work is required to upgrade the Spancrete bridge to
an HS20-44 highway design load.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The funding for this extra work is available in Capital Improvements Fund Number 210-166-
627-5804.
The total cost of this element of the project is summarized below.
A. Original Contract (approved 5-11-93) $4,250.00
B. Proposed Amendment No. I $3,000.00
Total = $7,250.00
The additional design cost is eligible for up to 93.75% reimbursement by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency.
Attachments:
Contract Amendment No. I
pwl 5~agdrpt%93%1026%liefer.cco
OCT. 1S '83 09:12 McDANIEL ENG. IN.C
MoDANIIL INOZNIIAIN6 OOIIPAMY, INC.
gO00 GAMINO 'DE L.& 8IBOTA, BUtTe 8~4
61g-Gg2-1~D~,34
PASE 2
Oombm-'4. 1993'
Depmmmt:s:d'hblic'Worke
43174 iudnmslt~k Drive
Tentends, ~q~
(119) 808-1180 FAX: fltO) Mt-Od~
~dd'be 'urad l~m '14.tSO ~ld~'e.' ffdiilim:m~dltle~. ye~ 'mY indi~te ,m
~~em~ mimU.~-in th, ~:pemm~4bd ind .mUming m i~ ~ our .omce.
... ~....., z:,.
Ver), truly
~O:cJb
Tide:
q
ITEM NO. I 1
APPROVAL
C ATTORNEY
ITY ~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
October 26, 1993
Rancho California Water District Easement for
Project No. PW93-03 CSD Pala Community Park
PREPARED BY:
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Approve the Rancho California Water District easement for water service to the Pala
Community Park and authorize the Mayor to execute the document.
2. Direct the City Clerk to execute and record the easement document.
DISCUSSION:
On August 25, 1992, the City Council awarded a contract to Wimmer Yamada Associates to
provide conceptual schematic design drawings, construction documents, and project
administration for the Pala Community Park Project which consists of developing a community
park on approximately 28.6 acres. In order to provide water service to the park, Rancho
California Water District is requiring a thirty foot (30') wide easement from the City to
construct and maintain the water main and appurtenances, including fire hydrant assemblies,
air vacuum/air release assemblies, blow-off assemblies, detector check valves, and service
connections from the pipeline to the water meter boxes.
The easement is located within the Pala Community Park approximately one half mile
southeast of the intersection of Pala Road and State Route 79 (south), (see attached map).
A copy of the easement document is available in the City Clerk's office for review.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact is associated with the City granting this easement to the Rancho California
Water District.
Attachment:
Location Map
Plat Map
-1 - pw151agdrpt%93%1026t, rowd9303.pcp 101893
~'s~ zoos;/'~
-
1~ C
,0
PROJECT
SITE
,/
.f4 .
,o,
MAP 2. PALA ROAD PARK: Looalion Map.
.RESE'~R P'ATION
MAP SOURCE: USGS 7.5' Pechanga and
Temecula Quads.
TMC #9Z, 1'11
0 2000
FEET
Tierro Madre
Consuffants
12/I 1/92:mp
N 02'58'51" W
82.23' --
N 87'01'09' W
45.00'
L,~T
, PCL it/1 / .Z.C, 7' .
V~.,"/.o,.~'".' /~x~'°'''x' /'~"~
"'. "" N 36°23'59'' E
~ ...A i! -9-~:~' : 4> \ , t/5'Irc..8"W'~R ~ L 0
' r:...':.: """' >'
9
~. _ ss~_o~.~
' P.O.B. ~/~\ ,,,
850'+ TO THE INT. /
OF LOMA LINDA RD.
I
P, ANCHO CALFOENEA WATER DXSTEECT
THIS PLAT IS SOLELY AN AID IN LOCATING THE PARCEL(S) DESCRIBED IN THE SHEET
AIrACHED DOCUMENT, IT IS NOT A PART OF THE WRITTEN OESCRIPTION THEREIN.
EXHIBIT PREPARED BY: SUBJECT: EASEMENT IN LOTS 1
· ROGERS ENGINEERING
B 2ne3 v.. R~. sdt. 154. T....,..,.. C~ .25~PG'S 41-48, FOR PALA
FAx (~OS) 6~--3m . Ti, (~os) 6m-252~ COMMUNITY PARK
SCALE: 1'=50' DRAWN BY: JRV DATE: 09-16-93 CHECKED BY: JBR
OF 1 SHEET
w.o.f
· ITEM NO. 12
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO.'
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
~-
'Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
October 26, 1993
Completion and Acceptance of the Traffic Signal Improvements at
Margarita Road and La Serene Way, Project No. PW92-06
PREPARED BY: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council accept the Traffic Signal Improvements at Margerita Road and La Serena
Way, Project No. PW92-06, as complete and direct the City Clerk to:
File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a six
(6) month Maintenance Bond in accordance with Caltrans standards in the
amount of 10% of the contract, and
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the
Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
BACKGROUND:
On March 23, 1993, the City Council awarded and authorized a contract for the Traffic Signal'
Installation at Margarita Road and La Serena Way, Project No. PW92-06 to Signal
Maintenance, Inc. The contract amount for this project was $118,398.65 with a contingency
of $11,839.87. Contract Change Order Nos. 001 through 003 were approved in the amount
of $7,752.25 for a total project cost of $126,150.90.
The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
The construction retention for this project will be released thirty-five (35) days after the Notice
of Completion has been recorded.
pwO4~gdrpt%93%1026~pw92-O6.acc 1018
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project was constructed within the contract amount plus contingency in the amount of
$126,150.90. This project is 100% funded through the Federal FY91/92 Surface
Transportation Program (STP). Funds for this program are being administered by Caltrans and
will be reimbursed to the City in accordance with Supplement No. 003 of the Local Agency-
State Agreement for Federal-Aid Projects approved by the City Council on March 23, 1993.
Attachment: Notice of Completion
pw04%agdrpt%93%1026~w92-06.ecc 1018
RECORDING FIEQUESTED BY
AND RETURN TO:
CITY CLERK
CfTY OF TEMECULA
43174 bbmee Pek Drive
Tememala, CA 92590
aPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR
RECORDER'S USE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described.
2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California 92590.
3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to SIGNAL MAINTENANCE, INC. to
perform the following work of improvement:
PW92-06 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT MARGARITA ROAD AND LA .SERENA WAY.
4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and
to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer of the City of Temecula and that said
work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on
October 26, 1993. That upon said contract the AMWEST SURETY INSURANCE COMPANY was
surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law.
5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of
Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT PW 92-06.
6. The street address of said property is: INTERSECTION OF MARGARITA ROAD AND
LA SERENA WAY.
Dated at Temecula, California, this _ day of
,1993.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
Ss
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of
perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPL~I'ION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF
COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of
Riverside by said City Council.
Dated at Temecula, California, this day of
· 1993.
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
FonndCIP-001 Re,. 12-5-91 pwO4~oip%projeots%pw92-O6~,oompletn.not 101893
ITEM NO. 13
APPROVAL
CITY ~
ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
October 26, 1993
Contract Change Orders No. 21 through 26 for Ynez Road Widening
Project, PW92-05, CFD 88-12
PREPARED BY: I~ Don Spagnolo, Princil~al Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve Contract Change Orders No. 21 through 26 for Ynez Road
Widening Project, PW92-05 for labor and equipment for various items of work, in the amount
of $21,495.32.
BACKGROUND:
During the construction of the Ynez Road Widening Project the following items of work have
resulted in a change to the contract:
Chanae Order No. 21 (Reimbursed by Rancho California Water District)
Three water valve covers were encountered while excavating the road bed. The valve covers
had been covered by the existing asphalt pavement at various locations on Ynez Road in the
area between Rancho California Road and Empire Creek. At the direction of R.C.W.D. these
valve covers were adjusted to grade.
Subtotal: $509.67
ChanQe Order No. 22 (Reimbursed by Rancho California Water District)
Two utility vaults containing water district facilities were encountered during the grading
operation for the curb and sidewalk at the northerly driveway to Advance Cardiovascular
Systems. At the direction of R.C.W.D. the vaults will be adjusted to grade so the contractor
can construct the sidewalk and complete the grading of the proposed slope.
Subtotal: $4,920.26
pw15%egdrpt%g3%lO26%pw92-O5 101893
Chanae Order No. 23
A portion of the traffic signal at Motor Car Parkway will require additional wiring referred to
as conductor runs. The additional conductors were required to avoid splicing the wires when
they were extended to the new pull box location. Conductors will be installed along two of
the four signal legs.
Subtotal: $4,911.90
Chanae Order No. 24
Several post indicator valves and fire line connections must be adjusted or relocated to
construct the proposed slope along the back of the new sidewalk adjacent to Advance
Cardiovascular Systems. These facilities ere part of the fire protection system for ACS and
must be adjusted or relocated during off peak hours.
Subtotal: $ 7,933.80
Change Order No. 25 (Reimbursed by Rancho California Water District)
An existing 1" copper water line was encountered during the excavation for the new road
section just south of Solana Way. The elevation of the line would place it within the new road
section. At the direction of R.C.W.D. this copper line will be lowered at a time and material
cost not to exceed $840.
Subtotal: $840.00
Chanae Order No. 26
Excessive water was encountered in the sub-base of the new road section just north of Motor
Car Parkway. This area was reviewed by the Soils Engineer end a recommendation was made
to overexcavate the unsuitable material and replace it with additional class II base and a
geotextile fabric. This will provide a stable sub base for the new road section.
Subtotal: $2,379.69
The total amount of the contract changes listed above is $21,495.32, of which $6,269.93
will be reimbursed by Rancho California Water District.
FISCAL IMPACT:
On January 26, 1993, the City Council awarded a contract for the construction of Ynez Road
Widening form Rancho California Road to Palm Plaza, to Vance Corporation for
$2,612,811.29. Contract Change Order No.s 01 through 20 were previously approved for
a total amount of $405,666.52. Contract Change Order No's 21 through 26 are in the
amount of $21,495.32 of which $6,269.93 will be reimbursed by R.C.W.D. There are
adequate funds available in the CFD 88-12 construction account.
pwl 5%agdrpt%93%1026%pw92-05 101893
City of Temecula '
43174 Business Park Drive · Ternecula, California 92590 19091 694-1989 · FAX (9o9l 694-1999
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 021
CONTRACT NO. PW92-05
PROJECT:
Ynez Road Widenins' - CFD 88-12
SHEET 1__ of _1_
TO CONTRACTOR: Vance Corooration
NOTE:
This chance order is not effective until aooroved by the Engineer
CHANGE REQUESTED: Project coordinator
A. EXTRA WORK:
Dudng the construction phase of the project, the contractor encountered three water valves
while excavating the road bed. At the direction of R.C.W.D. these facilities were adjusted
grade.
TOTAL: $ 509.67
Original Contract Amount: ...................................
Adjusted Contract Amount: ...................................
Change Order No. 021 .......................................
Total Contract Amount: .....................................
2,612,811.29
3,018,477.81
509.67
3,018,987.48
Adjustment of Working Days: ................................. Q
ceretul change y .
We the undersigned contractor have given atio proposed and h is proposal
is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish a rials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform
all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above.
Dated Accepted: t'/~~'/~
By: ~~a" '
Name:/'~j~g2atu~- r r ~: ~
Contractor: ~/'~'~/~C ~ ~
(company's name)
Title: _<~ ,-.'f ~f r ~.~t /-,-..,. ~
(print)
If the contractor does not sign acceptance to this order, his attention ie directed to the requirements of the specifications as
to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written protest within the time therein specified.
pwO4~cip~projects\pw92-05~cco~cco21 .cco 092893
1989
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590 (9o9l 694-1989 · FAX 1909~f" )1999
OONTFIAOT OHANGE OFIDEF1 NO. 022
CONTFIAOT NO. PWg2-05
PROJECT:
Ynez Road Widenine - CFD 88-12
SHEET 1 of ! .....
TO 'CONTRACTOR: Vance Corporation
NOTE:
This chanoe order is not effective until aDDroved by the Enaineer
CHANGE REQUESTED: Project coordinator
A. EXTRA WORK:
During the construction phase of the project, the contractor encountered two utility vaults
containing water district facilities. These vaults must be adjusted to grade so the contractor
can complete the embankment in front of Advanced Cardiovascular Systems.
TOTAL: $ 4,920.26
Original Contract Amount: ...................................
Adjusted Contract Amount: ...................................
Change Order No. 022 .......................................
Total Contract Amount: .....................................
2,612,811.29
3,01 ~:~
3,023,9b,.74
Adjustment of Working Days: ................................. 0
Approved: Principal Engineer By: ~ ~r" Date: /O '//8 ' ?~
we the undersigned contractor have given careful coneid.~ti.o; the change propDeed and hereby agree. If this proposal
is epproved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all mate~ may otherwise be noted above, and perform
all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above.
Dated Accepted: /~,/~~
(print)
Contractor:
Title:
(company's name)
If the contractor does not sign acceptance to this order, his attention is directed to the requirements of the specifications as
to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written protest within the time therein specified,
pw04\cip%projects\pw92-05\cco%cco22.cco 092893
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590
[909) 694-1989 · FAX (909) 694-1999
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 023
CONTRACT NO. PW92-05
PROJECT:
Ynez Road Widening - CFD 88-1 ~
SHEET 1__ of 1
TO CONTRACTOR: Vance Corporation
NOTE: This change order is not effective until agoroved bv the Enqineer
CHANGE REQUESTED: Project coordinator
A. EXTRA WORK:
During the construction phase of the project, the contractor discovered that portions of the
signal at Motor Car Parkway have no conductor rune. This change provides for the installation
of the missing conductor and wire runs.
TOTAL: $ 4,911.90
Original Contract Amount: ...................................
Adjusted Contract Amount: ...................................
Change Order No. 023 .......................................
Total Contract Amount: .....................................
2,612,811.29
3,023,907.74
4,911.90
3,028,819.64
Adjustment of Working Days: ................................. 0
Approved: Principal Engineer By: ~:r3f-- ~ Date:
we the undersigned contractor have given careful consider the change proposed end hereby agree. If this proposal
is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish ell ;, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform
ell services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept ee full payment therefore the prices shown above.
Dated Accepted: Z'd~l~,..~ Contractor:
By: ~//~ Title:
'i aur .
Name: x,,~,'~rc~t ,~,'~[ ~'r"2
(print)
If the contractor does not sign acceptance to this order, his attention i$ directed to the requirements of the specifications
to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written protart within the time therein specified.
(company's name)
pw04\cip~orojects~pw92-0~cco~,cco23.cco 092893
/
Ci :y of Temecula
4317zl. Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590 1909l 694-1989 ° FAX (9091 [ )99
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 024
CONTRACT NO. PW92-05
PROJECT:
Ynez Road Widening - CFD 88-12
SHEET 1__ of 1__
TO CONTRACTOR:
NOTE:
Vance Corporation
This change order is not effective until aDoroved bv the Engineer
CHANGE REQUESTED: Project coordinator
A. EXTRA WORK:
During the construction phase of the project, the contractor discovered that several post
indicator valves and fire department connections were impacted by dope construction along
the frontage at ACS. This change covers the contractor's cost to adjust these facilities to
grade.
TOTAL: $ 7,933.80
Original Contract Amount: ...................................
Adjusted Contract Amount: ...................................
Change Order No. 024 .......................................
Total Contract Amount: .....................................
2,612,811~9
3,028,81 ~,
7,933.80
3,036,753.44
B y
Name:
Adjustment of Working Days: ................................. Q
Approved' Principal Engineer By' ~i Date' /0 °//¢~° -~
We the und;rsigned contractor have giveL careful conside tion the change proposed an; hereby agree. Ilkthis proposal
is approved, that we will provide ell equipment,:~n I th~:~ otherwise be noted above, end perform
all services necessen~ for the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above.
-.Contractor: ~"-'~,,'f'~ ~" ~__'9 ~--/r_~
(company's name)
Title: . ~jr./'f',.-r l ,,..~-'.--,,~,J /
(print)
If the contractor does not sign acceptance to this order, his atlention is directed to the requirements of the specifications as
to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written protest within the time therein specified.
pwO4\cip%projecte~pw92-05\cco%cco24.cco 092893
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590
(909) 694-1989 · FAX 19091 694-1999
i
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER 'NO. 025
CONTRACT NO. PW92-05
PROJECT:
Ynez Road WidehinD - CFD 88-12
SHEET ! of 1__
TO CONTRACTOR: Vance Corporation
NOTE:
This chanQe order is not effective until aDDroved bv the Eneineer
CHANGE REQUESTED: Project coordinator
A. EXTRA WORK:
During the construction phase of the project, the contractor encountered a 1" copper water
line approximately 0.10' out of the A.C. section at the Jeep Dealership. Estimated cost to
relocate this copper line is $840. At the direction of R.C.W.D. this copper line will be
relocated and the actual cost for the relocation will be reimbursed to the City by R.C.W.D.
TOTAL: $ 840.00
Original Contract Amount: ...................................
Adjusted Contract Amount: ...................................
Change Order No. 025 .......................................
Total Contract Amount: .....................................
2,612,811.29
3,036,753.44
840.00
3,037,593.44
Adjustment of Working Days: .................................
Approved: Principal Engineer By: ~ · Date:
'
ell seaices necessa~ for the wol above specified, and will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above.
D,t,dA~..t,d:/~~) Contractor: /~E
~ t ~ Title: _ ~x~r~'~
~intJ
pwO4~cip~projects\pw92-05\cco~cco25.cco 092893
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590
19091 694-1989 · FAX 191:)91 "~999
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 026
CONTRACT NO. PW92-05
PROJECT:
Ynez Road Wideninq - CFD 88-12
SHEET 1_!_ of I
TO CONTRACTOR: Vance Corporation
NOTE:
This chanae order is not effective until aDDroved bv the Engineer
CHANGE REQUESTED: Project coordinator
A. EXTRA WORK:
During the construction phase of the project, the contractor encountered excessive water in
the sub-base just north of Motor Car Parkway. The cost include costs to overexcavate and
place class II base w/fabric.
TOTAL: $ 2,379.69
Original Contract Amount: ...................................
Adjusted Contract Amount: ...................................
Change Order No. 026 ....................................... $
Total Contract Amount: .....................................
$ 2,612,81 ~?~9
$ 3,037,5! ~
2,37~ .69
$ 3,039,973.13
Adjustment of Working Days: ................................. 0
Approved: Principal Engineer By: ~ Date: /0-//8° .r
We the undersigned contractor have given careful consider ion he change proposed and hereby agree. If Zis proposal
is approved, that we will provide ell equipment, furnish ell~~otherwise be noted above, and perform
all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above.
Dated Accepted:
B y:
Name: /////~g-¢-
· Contractor:
Title:
J (c°,m_rP;~
(print)
If the contractor does not sign acceptance to this order, his attention is directed to the requirements of the specifications as
to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written protest within the time therein specified.
pwO4\cip%projects%pw92-05%cco\cco26.cco 101493
ITEM NO. 1~-
APPROV~T.
CITY ATT~EY ~'
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
October 26, 1993
Contract Amendment No. 5 to Community Facilities District 88-12
Engineering Services Contract with J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc.
PREPARED BY: 0~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve Contract Amendment No. 5 to provide additional engineering
services for CFD 88-12 by J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. for the Winchester Road
Interchange Modifications in the amount of $97,000.00.
BACKGROUND:
The additional costs detailed in the following section for the Winchester Road Interchange
Modifications were arrived at during the design review process with Caltrans, and utility
companies serving the District.
I. Scope of Services
The Scope of Services for preparation of the plans, specification and engineer's
estimate for the Winchester Road Interchange Modification was developed
based on an estimate for the number of plan sheets necessary to meet Caltrans
requirements. During the course of preparing the Project Study Report (PSR),
the general scope of several design elements were more closely defined
including drainage, construction details, and landscape elements. This
increased the amount of plan sheets required to provide the necessary
construction information. An additional $20,000 in design fees is a result of
a more defined Scope of Services based on the approved Project PSR.
Proposed additional cost:
$20,000
-1- pwl 5%egdrpt~93~1026%CFD88-12.ADS 101893
II.
III.
IV.
Modification of the North Bound On and Off-ramp:
During the initial Project Report (PR) review, Caltrans required a change in the
acceleration lane design on the Northbound on-ramp despite having approved
the previous design during the more preliminary Project Study Review (PSR)
stage. The change is to provide a longer acceleration lane which would require
the widening of the Santa Gertrudis bridge by an average of 3.5 feet. The
change would require the full design end detailing of the bridge over the creek.
In addition, Caltrans has required that we revise the radii of the Northbound off-
ramp, even though the present design is compatible with the requirements of
the current Highway design Manual. This will mean the redesign of the entire
southeast quadrant of the interchange.
Caltrans also required the proposed retaining wall along the Northbound off-
ramp be replaced with a standard slope along the right-of-way line.
Proposed additional cost:
$28,000
Structural Modifications to Santa Gertrudis Bridge:
The work will include modifications to the existing bridge structure at the deck
and foundation levels, issuance of contract documents, estimates, modification
to the advance planning study and Caltrans processing to provide for the longer
acceleration lane discussed in Section II. We are still negotiating with Celtrans
to eliminate this change and if successfuj the amendment will be reduced by
$28,000.
Proposed additional cost:
Relocate Sewer Line - North Bound Off-ramp:
$28,000
The relocation of approximately 900 lineal feet of existing 15" trunk sewer,
adjacent to the existing Caltrans right-of-way. The current sewer location is in
conflict with the proposed northbound exit ramp and northbound loop ramp
locations. This work will be designed on separate plans per Eastern Municipal
Water District standards, and reviewed by the District. Included will be field
survey and preparation of easement documents.
Proposed additional cost:
$14,900
-2- pw15%agdrpt%93%1026\CFD88-12.Ad5 101893
V. Revise Parking at Palm Plaza Parking Lot:
The parking lot and drainage facility will need to be redesigned at Palm Plaza
to reflect the necessary changes due to ramp configuration modifications
identified in Section II,
Proposed additional cost:
86,100
TOTAL AMOUNT
$97,000
FISCAL IMPACT:
All of the above costs are eligible for funding through Community Facilities District 88-12.
Adequate funds have been reserved within the budget of the District. The total cost of this
element of the project is summarized below:
A. Original Contract (Approved 12-18-90) $622,534
B. A Portion of Amendment No. 4
(Approved 9-14-93) 3,333
C. Proposed Amendment No. 5 97.000
Total: $722.867
-3- pwl 5~agdrpt~93%1026%CF!;)88-12.Ad5 101893
AMENDMENT NO. S
J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES
CONTRACT ORDER NO. 0421
The Agreement dated December 13, 1990 between the City of Temecula, and I.F. Davidson
Associates (herein referred to as * Agreement*) is hereby mended as follows:
Professional Design Service for CFD 88-12 - Winchester Road
Professional Design Services for CFD 88-12
Winchester Road
Section
The Scope of Work is hereby mended by adding the following activities:
I. Scope of Services
The Scope of Services for preparation of the plans, specification and engineer's
estimate for the Winchester Road Interchange Modification was developed based
on an estimate for the number of plan sheets necessary to meet Caltrans
requirements. During the course of preparing the Project Study Report (PSR),
the general scope of several design elements were more closely defined including
drainage, construction details, and landscape elements. This increased the mount
of plan sheets required to provide the necessary construction information. An
additional $20,000 in design fees is a result of a more defined Scope of Services
based on the approved Project PSR.
Proposed additional cost:
II. Modification of the North Bound On and Off-ramp:
During the initial Project Report (PR) review, Calms required a change in the
acceleration lane design on the Northbound on-ramp despite having approved the
previous design during the more preliminary Project Study Review (PSR) stage.
The change is to provide a longer acceleration lane which would require the
widening of the Santa Gertrudis bridge by an average of 3.5 feet. The change
would require the full design and detailing of the bridge over the creek.
In addition, Calms has required that we revise the radii of the Northbound off-
ramp, even though the present design is compatible with the requirements of the
current Highway design Manual. This will mean the redesign of the entire
southeast quadrant of the interchange.
Calms also required the proposed retaining wall along the Northbound off-ramp
be replaced with a standard slope along the right-of-way line.
Proposed additional cost:
$28,000
pwO4~r:~cip~projecu~pw92-OS~amendnoSjfdlO1993
IH. Structural Modifications to Santa Gertrudis Bridge: :
The work will include modifications to the erAsting bridge structure at the deck
and foundation levels, issuance of contract documents, estimates, modification to
the advance planning study and Caltrans processing to provide for the longer
acceleration lane discussed in Section H. We are still negotiating with CalWans
to eliminate this change and if successful the amendment will be reduced by
$28,000.
Proposed additional cost:
$28,000
Relocate S~wer Line - North Bound Off-ramp:
The relocation of approximately 900 lineal feet of existing 15" trunk sewer,
adjacent to the existing Caltrans right-of-way. The current sewer location is in
conffict with the proposed northbound exit ramp and northbound loop ramp
locations. This work will be designed on separate plans per F~-~tern Municipal
Water District standards, and reviewed by the District. Included will be field
survey and preparation of casement documents.
Proposed additional cost:
Revise Parking at Palm Plaza Parking Lot:
$14,900
The parking lot and drainage facih'ty will need to be raiesigned at Palm Plaza to
reflect the necessary changes due to ramp configuration modifications identified
in Section H.
Proposed additional cost:
$6,100
$97,000
Section 2
Compensation for services shall be total of all services described in this Amendment and shall
not exceed Ninety-seven Thousand Dollars ($97,000.00).
All above costs are eligible for funding through Community Facilities District 88-12. Adequate
funds have been reserved within budget of the District. The total cost of this element of the
project is summarized below:
A. Original Contract (Approved 12-18-90) $ 622,534
B. A Portion of Amendment No. 4
(Approved 9-14-93) 3,333
C. Proposed Amendment No. 5 97.000
Total: $ 722.867
pwO4.'w:~ip~oj~ts~m~2-O~m~ndno.q.jfdlO1993
Section 3
All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same.
The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the Date and year above written.
CONSULTANT
CITY OF TEMECULA
By: By:
J.F. Davidson Assoc.
Mayor J. Sal Mufioz
APPROV!~r~ AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
pwO4~r:~cip~projecte~ow92-OS~amendno5 .jfd 101993
ITEM NO.
15
APPROVAT.
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane McLerney, Finance Officer
October 26, 1993
Selection of Telephone System for the Community Recreation Center
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the purchase of the telephone system for the Community Recreation Center
from Digital Communications, Inc. in the amount of $25,955.
Appropriate $19,955 from the General Fund Unreserved Fund Balance to account
number 001-199-999-5603.
DISCUSSION:
Staff recently conducted a Request for Proposals for Telephone Equipment and Installation
(RFP). The purpose of this project was to provide the City with a digital/analog telephone
system and data circuits for the Community Recreation Center (CRC). Additionally the
telephone system will support the City's Emergency Operations Center (EOC).
The RFP was mailed to three NEC authorized companies, and one local non-NEC authorized
firm. The proposals received were as follows:
1. Vision Communications Service, Inc. Incomplete Response
2. Digital Telecommunicetion Corp. $25,955
3. COM-AID 28,422
The responses to the RFP's were reviewed on the basis of the firm's experience with similar
projects, the qualifications and number of personnel available for the assignment, the
additional consultants and associates to be retained for the project, the firm's willingness and
demonstrated ability to meet deadlines.
Based upon the above, staff selected Digital Telecommunications Corp. (Digital) for the
acquisition and installation of the equipment. Digital demonstrated the necessary experience
I~.WOFfONLtA~FJqDA~6~CFHOI~aC, N
and qualifications to complete this project for the City.
Staff considered two alternatives for the configuration of the system.
Alternative A
Equipment: NEC E-PRO II Digital Switch
Total Equipment Cost: $25,955
Service:
16 telephone extensions located in the Multi Purpose and Meeting rooms for the
primary support/use of the EOC.
5 telephone extensions located in the CRC offices and swimming pool office for daily
use by staff.
- I telephone extension for the AudioNideo office.
- Expandable up to 96 extensions to meet any future needs.
- 4 network connections for CRC Staff.
Up to 11 available network connections for EOC usa (Multi Purpose and Meeting
rooms).
The NEC E-PRO II Digital Switch would be connected to the City's main telephone
switch and local area network located at City Hall via a GTE T1 High Capacity Digital
Line at a cost of $4200 per year. (Offset by savings in current charges)
Alternative B
Equipment: 2 CSU/DSU/2 Eithernet Bridge
Total Equipment Costs: $12,411
Service for EOC:
Support for EOC w/o E-PRO Switch
- GTE Service for EOC use to be scaled down to 9 lines
Service for CRC:
- GTE Service for CRC use to be scaled down to 2 lines
- Dedicated Data Circuit for EOC
$2,7001yr
$600/yr
$4,200/yr
Although Alternative B requires less of an initial outlay of funds, the system requires higher
on-going costs to support the service. Alternative A is approximately $4200 per year~
Alternative B is approximately $7500 per year.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The equipment costs for the recommended Alternative A is $25,955. Funds in the amount
of $6,000 have been included in the CRC appropriation. An appropriation is required from the
General Fund Unreserved Fund Balance in the amount of $19,955, to account number 001-
199-999-5603 for the EOC portion of the expenditure.
'ITEM 16
T0:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVA
CITY ATTORNEY ~,
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
October 26, 1993
Appeal of Planning Commission Approval of PA93-0009, Tentative Parcel Map
No. 25059, First Extension of Time and PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, First
Extension of Time
Prepared by: Craig Ruiz
RECOMMENDATION: It is requested that the City Council:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0009, FIRST EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 25059 TO SUBDIVIDE A 5.51 ACRE
PARCEL INTO 4 PARCELS LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF RIDGE PARK
DRIVE APPROXIMATELY 70 FEET SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 945-130-0003
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0010, FIRST EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR PLOT PLAN NO. 34 TO CONSTRUCT A 102,243 SQUARE FOOT
OFFICE BUILDING, A 7,872 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT, A 7,000 SQUARE
FOOT RESTAURANT AND A FOUR LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE ON A 5.51
ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE
APPROXIMATELY 70 FEET SOUTH OF RANClIO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 945-130-003
DISCUSSION
The above referenced project was originally scheduled to be heard by the City Council on
September 28, 1993 (see attached staff report). The item was continued to the October 26,
1993 Council meeting to enable the City Attorney to research recently adopted Senate Bill
428 (SB 428) which grants an automatic two-year time extension for active tentative maps.
I~:~SLfFAPPRPTWPABMEM.CC 10/1~/93 vgw 1
The above project was scheduled to expire on January 15, 1993. On September 13, 1993,
the State Legislature enacted SB 428. It is___the opinion of the City Attorney tha,. the
automatic two-year time extension does not apply in this situation due to the fact the suDJect
project, absent the time extension, was not an active map. Only active projects that are due
to expire after the authorization date of SB 428 are eligible for automatic the two-year time
extension. If the above project is approved by the Council, it will be granted the automatic
time extension in January of 1994.
One of the issues raised in the 8ppellant's appeal is the ability of the City to add new
conditions of approval to an approved project. As stated in the attached staff report, the City
does indeed have this ability to add new conditions as part of the time extension approval
process, so long as the conditions am required for public health or safety, for compliance with
state or federal law, or for assuring compliance with the applicable zoning ordinance. Projects
which are eligible for the automatic time extension under SB 428 will not require City
approval. However, any further or additional extensions will require City approval. Even
under SB 428, if the health or safety of City residents is at risk, the City could condition
subsequent approvals, such as grading or building permits.
I~:~S~'FAFFRPT~9PA93M!~M.CC 10/18/93 ~ 2
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
AP~")V~
CITY ATTORNL
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF 'rEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planninl~~
September 28, 1993
Appeal of Planning Commission Approval of PA93-0009, Tentative Parcel Map
No. 25059, First Extension of Time and PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, First
Extension of Time
Prepared by: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION: It is requested that the City Council:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0009, FIRST EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 25059 TO SUBDIVIDE A 5.51 ACRE
PARCEL INTO 4 PARCELS LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF RIDGE PARK
DRIVE APPROXIMATELY 70 FEET SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 945-130-0003
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0010, FIRST EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR PLOT PLAN NO. 34 TO CONSTRUCT A 102,243 SQUARE FOOT
OFFICE BUILDING, A 7,872 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT, A 7,000 SQUARE
FOOT RESTAURANT AND A FOUR LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE ON A 5.51
ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE
APPROXIMATELY 70 FEET SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 945-130-003
BACKGROUND
On January 15, 1991, the Temecula City Council approved the above referenced projects.
On October 7, 1991, the City of Temecula Planning Commission approved a Minor Change
application for Tentative Parcel Map 25059.
R:~,S~STAFFRP~9PA93.CC 9120/93 vgw
The first extension of time for these two items as heard at the July 19, 1993 Plannin~
Commission meeting. The Commission continued the item to the August 2, 1993
Commission meeting and directed staff to clar~'Tf'y issues raised by the applicant regarding the
addition of new conditions of approval and the length of the extension of time.
DISCUSSION
New Conditions of Aooroval
The applicant feels that staff does not have the authority to add any new conditions of
approval. The applicant believes the added conditions are not related to health and safety
issues. Also, the applicant feels that because the City has not adopted the Draft General Plan,
the project does not need to be consistent with the Draft General Plan.
Specifically, the applicant objects to conditions number 3 through number 22. These new
conditions are all standard conditions of approval. The new conditions relate to new City and
Federal standards for grading, erosion control, National Pollutant Discharge Emission System
(NPDES) and the Western Bypass Corridor road.
The Public Works staff has recommended that the approval of the extension be subject to
additional conditions as presented to the Planning Commission at the July 19, 1993 hearing
in compliance with the City's current standards and as required to protect the general he81th
and safety of the community. Also, the Assistant City Attorney stated at the August 2, 1993
meeting that the City does indeed have the ability to add new conditions of approval to 'a
previously approved project. The Assistant City Attorney also stated that State law requires
the project to be in compliance with the Draft General Plan in the absence of an adopted
General Plan.
Lenqth of Extension of Time
At the July 19, 1993 meeting, the applicant stated that, because the project is conditioned
to provide for offsite improvements in an amount in excess of $100,000, an automatic three
year extension should be granted as allowed by the Subdivision Map Act.
However, Section 66452.6 of the Subdivision Map Act specifies that: "if the subdivider is
required to expend one hundred twenty-five thousand dollars ($125,000) or more to
construct, improve, or finance the constructiori or improvement of public improvements
outside the property boundaries of the tentative map, excluding improvements of public rights-
of-way which abut the boundary of the property to be subdivided and which are reasonably
related to the development of that property, each filing of a final map shall extend the
expiration of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map by 36 months from the
date of its expiration or the date of the previously filed final map, whichever is later."
R:~S',STAFFRFT%gPA93.CC 9122/93 vgw 2
T- ~e, the applicant has not met any of the following requirements for 8 three year -;ension of time:
1. The filing of a final map
2. The filing of multiple final maps as part of a phased project
3. The expenditure of ~ 125,000
If .the applicant meets the above requirements at the time of the filing of the final map, the
three year extension may be granted at that time. At this stage of the approval process, the
applicant's request for the three year extension is inapplicable.
Attachments:
5.
7.
Resolution 93- - Page 4
Resolution 93- - Page 9
Conditions of Approval - Page 14
Previously Adopted Conditions of Approval - Page 15
July 19, 1993 and August 2, 1993 Planning Commission Staff
Reports - Page 16
July 19, 1993 and August 2, 1993 Planning Commission
Minutes - Page 17
Exhibits - Page 18
A. Vicinity Map
R:%S~STAFFRPT'%,gPA93,CC 9122/93 vgw 3
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 93-_
R:~,S~.STAFFRF'~gPA93.CC 9120/93 vgw 4
ATTACHMENT NO. I
,.AV'O7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-
0009, FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 25059 TO SUBDIVIDE A 5.51 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON
THE WEST SIDE OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE APPROXIMATELY 70
FEET SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 945-130-0003
WHEREAS, Preferred E~luities Development, Inc. filed a Planning Application No 93-
0009, First Extension of Time for Tentative Parcel Map No. 25059 in accordance with the
Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning end Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has
adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Extension of Time application was processed in the time and manner
prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Extension of Time on June 19,
1993, and August 2, 1993, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify
either in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission approved
said Extension of Time;
WHEREAS, Preferred Equities Development, Inc. filed an Appeal of the Planning
Commission's decision to approve Planning Application No. 93-0009, First Extension of Time
for Tentative Parcel Map No. 2505.9 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use,
Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Appeal application was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Appeal on
September 28, 1993, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in
support or opposition to said Appeal; and
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Staff Report regarding the
.Extension of Time;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findines. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
findings:
R:~S~STAFFRPT~gPA93.CC 9120/93 vow 5
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall
~ .;opt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month
period of time, the city is not subject to the req'~rement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if 811 Of the
following requirements are met:
general plan.
The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the
2. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other
actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following:
a. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action
proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or
which will be studied within 8 reasonable time.
b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area
Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula
as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now
within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General
Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its
General Plan.
C. The proposed Subdivision is consistent with the SWAP and meets the
requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit:
general plan·
The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the
2. The City Council finds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following:
a. There is reasonable probability that Planning Application No. 93-
0009, First Extension of Time for Tentative Parcel No. 25059 as proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
c. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
R:~,$%STAFFRP~gPA93.CC 9120/93 vgw 6
D. The City Council, in approving Planning Application No. 93-0009, makes the
following findings, to wit: "
1. There is a reasonable probability that Tentative Parcel Map No. 25059
will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable
time and in accordance with State Law. The project, as conditioned, conforms with existing
applicable city zoning ordinances and development standards. Furthermore, the proposed
office/commercial development is consistent with the is consistent with the future General
Plan Land Use Designation of Business Park.
2. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference
with the City's future General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the
Plan, since the surrounding land uses are proposed to be commercial and business park.
3. The proposed use or action as conditioned complies with State planning
and zoning laws, local Ordinance Nos. 348 end 460; and California Governmental Code
Sections 65000-66009 (Planning and Zoning Law).
4. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the
public health or welfare since ell impacts have been mitigated to a level of insignificance.
6. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the
built or natural environment as determined in Negative Declaration, and the conditions of
approval for this project.
7. Said Findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and
environmental documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by
reference, due to the fact that they are referenced in the attached Staff Report, Exhibits,
Environmental Impact Report, and Conditions of Approval.
E. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, the Plot Plan proposed conforms to the
logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future
development of the surrounding property.
Section 2. Environmental Comoliance. Adoption of the previously adopted Negative'
Declaration for Tentative Parcel Map No. 25059-is recommended.
Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby recommends
approval of Planning Application No. 93-0009, First Extension of Time for Tentative Parcel
Map No. 25059 to subdivide a 5,51 acre parcel into 4 parcels.
A. Attachment No. 3, attached hereto.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
R:%S%STAFFRFT%9PA93.CC 9/20/93 vgw 7
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of September, 1993.
J. SAL MU~IOZ
MAYOR
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council
of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 28th day of September,
1993 by the following vote of the Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
JUNE S. GREEK
CITY CLERK
R:~S~STAFFRPT'~gPA93.CC 9120/93 vow 8
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
RESOLUTION NO. 93-_
R:%S%STAFFRF~iPA83.CC 8120/93 vgw 9
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
RESOLUTION'NO. 93-
NOT
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-
0010, FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLOT PLAN NO. 34 TO
CONSTRUCT A 102,243 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING, A
7,872 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT, A 7,000 SQUARE FOOT
RESTAURANT AND A FOUR LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE ON
A 5o51 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF RIDGE
PARK DRIVE APPROXIMATELY 70 FEET SOUTH OF RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.
945-130-0003
WHEREAS, Preferred Equities Development, Inc. filed an Planning Application No 93-
0010, for a First Extension of Time for Plot Plan No. 34 in accordance with the Riverside
County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted
by reference;
WHEREAS, said Extension of Time al~plication was processed in the time and manner
prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Extension of Time on June 19,
1993, and August 2, 1993, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify
either in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission approved
said Extension of Time;
WHEREAS, Preferred Equities Development, Inc. filed an Appeal of the Planning
Commission's decision to approve Planning Application No. 93-0010, First Extension of Time
for Plot Plan No. 34 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning end
Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Appeal application was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Appeal on
September 28, 1993, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in
support or opposition to said Appeal; and
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Staff Report regarding the
Extension of Time;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
R:~S~STAFFRPT~gPA93.CC 9/20/93 vgw 10
Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the ~..itowing
findings: ___
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall
adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month
period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the
following requirements are met:
1. The city is proceeding in · timely fashion with the preparation of the
general plan.
2. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other
actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following:
a. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action
proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or
which will be studied within a reasonable time.
b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future :adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
c. The proposed use or action complied with ell other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Ran, as amended by the Southwest Area
Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula
as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now
within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General
Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its
General Plan.
C. The proposed application is consistent with the SWAP and meets the
requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit:
gef~eral plan.
The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with · preparation of the
2. The City Council finds, in recommending approval of projects and taking
other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the
following:
a. There is reasonable probability that the said application will be
consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied
within a reasonable time since the project is consistent with the existing SWAP and zoning
designation.
b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan since the project is compatible with surrounding development.
R:%S%STAFFRFT%9PA93.CC 9120/93 vgw 11
c. The proposed use or action complies with ell other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances since it complies with Ordinance No. 348.
D. Pursuant to Section 18.30(c), no plot plan may be approved unless the
following findings can be made:
1. The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan requirements and
with all applicable requirements of state law and City ordinances.
public health,
is compatible
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical development of the land and
with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property.
E. The City Council, in recommending approval of the proposed Plot Plan, makes
the following findings, to wit:
1. There is a reasonable probability that PA93-0010, First Extension of Time
for Plot Plan No 34, will likely be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will
be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State Law due to the fact that the
proposed commercial/office .buildings are consistent with the existing Industrial Park zoning
and the Draft General Plan Land Use Designation of Business Park.
2. This project is consistent with the Southwest Area Plan (SWAP) since
it is designated as Restricted Light Industrial on the plan.
3. This project is consistent with the Industrial Park zone since it meets all
the requirements for this zone.
4. This project will not have e significant impact on the environment since
all the impacts have been mitigated to a level of insignificance.
5. The proposed project is suitable for the site since it accommodates all
the structures, the necessary parking, landscaping and circulation for the site.
F. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, the Plot Plan as proposed conforms to
the logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future
de~/elopment of the surrounding property.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. Adoption of the previously adopted Negative
Declaration for Plot Plan No. 34 is recommended.
Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves
Planning Application No. 93-0010, First Extension of Time for Plot Plan 34 to construct a
102,243 square foot office building, a 7,872 square foot restaurant, a 7,000 square foot
restaurant and a four level parking structure on a 5.51 acre parcel located on the west side
of Ridge Park Drive approximately 70 feet south of Ranch California Road and known as
Assessor's Parcel No. 945-130-003 subject to the following conditions:
A. Attachment No. 2, attached hereto.
R:~,S~,STAFFRPT%gPA93.CC 9120/93 vgw 12
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of September, 1993.
J. SAL MU~IOZ
MAYOR
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA) .'
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council
of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 28th day of September,
1993 by the following vote of the Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
JUNE S. GREEK
CITY CLERK
R:%S~STAFFRPT%gPA93,CC 8120/93 vgw 13
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF;-.APPROVAL
Tentative Parcel Map No. 25059
Project Description: First one-year extension of time for Tentative Parcel Map
No. 25009, a subdivision 5.51 acres into 4 parcels.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 945-130-003
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
Tentative Parcel Map No. 25059, First Extension of Time shall comply with all
Conditions of Approval for Tentative Map No. 25059 (copies of which are attached)
unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval.
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act
and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, unless modified by the conditions listed
below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and
City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
The Developer shall comply with all the Condition of Approval set for the Tentative Parcel Map
25059 as approved by the City of Temecula City Council on January 15, 1991. The following
are the Department of Public Works additional Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true
meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department
of Public Works.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
A Grading Permit for precise (including all on-site flat work and improvements) grading
shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City
right-of-way.
All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent proiects and existing improvements
contiguous to the site.
R:%S~STAFFRFT~PA93.PC 711 2193 Idb 5
PRIOR
7.
10.
11.
12.
13.
PRIOR
14..
15.
16.
Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part
of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section.
TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
The final grading plan shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and shall be
reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board.
No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NO!) has been filed or
the project is shown to be exempt.
A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
An erosion control plan in accordance with the City Standards shall be prepared by a
registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed free condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District prior
to issuance of any permit. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has
already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
TO RECORDATION OF FINAL MAP
Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid.
The Developer shall construct or post. security and enter into an agreement
guaranteeing the construction of the following public/private improvements within 18
months in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the
Department of Public Works.
A. Erosion control and slope protection.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
R:%S~STAFFRPT~gPA93.PC 7112193 Idb 6
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:%S~,STAFFFFI~gPA93.CC 9120/93 vgw 14
17.
18.
. PRIOR
19.
20.
The Developer shall notify the City's cable 'IV franchises of the Intent to Develop.
Conduit shall be installed to cable 'IV standards.
The Develoljer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to
object to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or
a Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed
"Western Bypass Corridor." The form of the offer shall be subject to the approval of
the City Engineer and City Attorney.
TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
A Transportation Demand Management Program will be required if there is a potential .
for more than 100 people to be employed at this site.
A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for
location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing
compaction and site conditions.
21.
Grading of the subject:property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code,
the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading
Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall
be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY
22.
All existing improvements damaged or broken due to the construction of this project
shall be repaired or removed and replaced as directed by the Department of Public
Works per current City Standards.
R:%S\STAFFRFT%gPA93.PC ?112193 klb 7
TO:
FROM:
RE.-
County of Riverside
HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY
CITY OF TEMECULA
ATTN: Craig Ruiz
DATE:
GREG DELLENBACH, Environmental Health Specialist IV
PLOT PLAN NO. 34, 1ST EXTENSION OF TIME (PA-93-0010)
The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed Case No.
PA93-0010, 1st Extension of Time for Plot plan No. 34.
Our comments of 10-09-9- will remain as stated with the
change in name for the contact person in Hazardous Materials
to Mike Daly.
We have no objections to extending this Plot Plan.
GD:dr
DOH,,GA-O0~ i'Flev 4/92)
CiC 3f Temecula
Planning Department
DEV~-OPNrg~YT REVIEW
PRO/ECT TRANSMITrAL
RECEIVED
FEB 1 B 1993
Ans 'd..-... ........-
The attached project has been scheduled for the Development Review Committee Meeting
of February 4, 1993.
Your written comments or attendance is requested. Please transmit written comments nrior
to February 1. 1993.
The meeting will bc held at:
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact Craig Ruiz at (909) 694-6400.
Project Tnformation:
Case No.: PA.93-0010, 1st Extension of Time for Plot Plan No. 34
Applicant:
Proposal:
Location:
Intended
Environmental Action:
A.P.N.:
Cue' Planner:
SUms:
Comments:
Preferred Equities
A proposed 276,000 square foot office/restaurant development of
5.5 acres.
West side of Ridge Park Drive, south of Rancho California
Road
Re-cerdf-y previously adopted Negative Declaration
940-310-033,034, 037
Craig Ruiz
X New ProjeCt
Resubmittal: Previous DRC Date:
~is project was fu'st appmvexi January 15, 1991.
The Riverside Couney Fire Deparcmenn recommends
approval on =he ex:ension of time on FP 34 PA
93-0010. Please refer no nhe original le:=er
of condi:ion daued 10/09/90.
R:~XDRCXlOPA93.TEN 1/21/~3
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, First One Year Extension of Time
Project Description: A request for a one year lime extension for Plot Plan No. 34, a
seven (7) story office building totaling 102,243 square feet, a 7,872 square foot
restaurant, a four (4) level parking structure containing 134,933 square feet, and a
building pad for a proposed 7,000 square foot restaurant on 5.51 acre site.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 945-130-003
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, First Extension of Time shall comply with all previous
Conditions of Approval for Tentative Map No. 25059 (copies of which are attached)
unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
The following are the Department of Public Works additional Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person
of the Department of Public Works.
PRIOR
2.
TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board.
No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or
the project is shown to be exempt.
'Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning
Department and the Department of Public Works for review.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weedfree condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with othererosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to
the subject property.
R:~S~"TAFFRI~IOPAg3.PC 7114J93 ~ ~
PRIOR
8.
11.
PRIOR
12.
All required 'fees shall be paid.
TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS""
A Transportation Demand Management Program will be required if there is a potential
for more than 1 O0 people to be employed at the site.
The underlying Parcel Map 25059 shall be recorded.
The Developer shall notify the City's cable 'IV franchises of the intent to develop.
Conduit shall be installed to cable TV standards.
The Developer shall show proof of a recorded written offer to participate in, and waive
all rights to object to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities
District, or a Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the
proposed "Western Bypass Corridor". The form shall be subject to the approval of the
City Engineer and City Attorney.
TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
All existing improvements damaged or broken due to the construction of this project
shall be repaired or removed and replaced as directed by the Department of Public
Works per current City Standards.
It:~L~T~IOPAB.PC 7114/93 bJb '7
J.M. HARRIS
Cuun~, Fire Chief
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
210 WEST ~'~N JACINTO AVENUE * PERRIS, CAUFOP, NIA 92~.
C/14) 657-3183
February 8, 1993
TO:
ATTN:
RE:
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CRAIG RUIZ
PA95-0009 PARCEL MAP N0.25059
1st. EXTENSION OF TIME
The Fire DeDartment has a objections, comments or conditions
the granting of the extension of time.
All outestions regarding the meaning of conditions shall
ferred to the Planning and Engineering Staff.
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire DeDartment Planner
for
Michael E. Gray,
Fire Captain Specialist
be re-
Cl RIYEF. SI~E OFFICE
3760 12~h S..-.-/- Riv,~ailc. CA 9250!
(714} 275-~7''7 ' FAX (714) 369.74SI
FT'RI~- FR~v~..u-~J-ON DIVISION
79-733 Ca,..,.., C/,aL ~ S,,i:e F. ~ ~ 9Z~l
(6t91 8634886 t~ (etg) 863-;072
~ ~t~feO on re~c/e~ Daot
RECEive-
FEB 1
City Temecula.
Planning Department
DBV~LOP~ R~VI~W CO.MlVffrrEE
pROIBCT TRANSMITTAL
The sttached project has been scheduled for the Development Review Committee Meeting
of February 4, 1993.
Your written commcnts or attendanc~ is requested. Ple~e trav~m|t written comments prior
.to February 1, 1993.
The meeting will be held at: City of Te. mecula
planning Department
43174 Busin~ Park Drive
Temc~nl~, CA 92590
If you have any questions z=gm-ding this project, please contact Craig Ruh at (909) 694-6400.
Project lrfformation:
Case No.:
Applicant:
Proposal:
Locadon:
Intcnded
Environmental Action:
A.Pi'L:
Case Plumer:
Status:
Comments:
pA93-0010, let Extension of Time for Plot Plan No. 34
prderred Equities
A proposed 276,000 squax~ ~oot off~ce/rc, staurant development of
5.5 acres.
West side of Ridge Park Drive, south of Rancho California-
Road
p.e-certif~ previously adopted Negative Declaration
940-310-033,034, 057
Craig Ruiz
.X- New project
Resubmitnl: previous DRC Date:
~nis project wa~ fLr~t approved Ianuary 15, 1991.
The Kiverside County Fire Department recoEaends
approval-on the extension of time on PP 34 PA
93-0010. Please refer to the original letter
of coudi:ion dated 10/09/90-
R,:~,DRC%iOI~A~3.TL-,i 1/21/13 I~
lancho
February 3, 1993
RECEIVED
FEB 0 8 1~
Ans 'd ............
Besei d Directors:
Pintdent
Jeffrey L. M~lder
Sr. Vies P~s~ient
Ralph H. Daily
Nancy K. HuZhas
Csaba F. Ko
Lisa D. Paterson
Richard D. Steffey
Mr. Craig Ruiz
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43180 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Water Availability, Parcel Map 25059
PA93-0009, First Extension of Time
Dear Mr. Ruiz:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements
between RCWD and the property owner.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCW'D.
If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Senga Doherty.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P. E.
Manager of Development Engineering
SB:SO:aj30/F18~
cc: Senga Doherty, Engineering Technician
TO:
Coux ty of Riverside
CITY OF TEMECULA
ATTN: Craig Ruiz
HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY
DATE:
RECEIVED
FEB 0 8 1993
Ar~'d ....,_,_,.
02-01-93
~'GREG DELLENBACH, Environmental Health Specialist IV
FROM:
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 25059, 1ST EXTENSION OF TIME
RE:' PA93-0009
The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed Case No.
PA93-0009, 1st Extension of Time for Tentative Parcel Map
NO. 25059.
This Department has approved this map on 08-20-91. The
sewer "will-serve" letter from Eastern Municipal Water
District dated 05-09-90 reguired "the developer to complete
all necessary financial and other arrangements...as
determined by the District by November 1991."
The Department of Environmental Health will, therefore,
require a current "will-serve" letter from Eastern Municipal
We.%er District at time of issuance of a Building Department
application.
Other than this requirement, we have no objections to the
Tentative Parcel Map from being extended.
GD:dr
QOH...GA.,O02 (Flev 4/92)
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:%St, STAFFRI:~gPA93.CC 11120,/93 vgw 15
ATTACHMENT I
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Parcel Map No. 25059
Minor Change No. I
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT.
A. Revise Condition No. 37 to read as follows:
37.
Prior to issuance of the first building permit, plans for traffic
signals, as warranted by an amended traffic study subject to the
final approval of the Department of Public Works, shall be
designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City
Engineer for the intersections of Rancho California Road at Ridge
Park Drive and Rancho California Road at Vincent Moraga.
B, Revise Condition No, 38 to read as follows:
38.
Prior to issuance of the first building permit, a signing and striping
plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved
by the City Engineer the intersection of Rancho California Road at
Ridge Park Drive to the intersection of Rancho California Road at
Vincent Moraga as directed by the Department of Public Works.
Based on the approved Traffic Study, these plans shall be
designed to provide for 300' of left turn storage capacity on
westbound Rancho California Road to southbound Ridge Park
Drive and southbound Vincent Moraga.
Delete Condition No. 39. in its entirety
D. Revise Condition No. 40 to read as follows:
40.
Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the subdivider shall
submit an amended traffic study prepared by a registered Traffic
Engineer to determine the subdivider's percent of cost and the
warrants for both signals. The developer shall front the
construction costs of the signals as warranted for Rancho
California Road at Ridge Park Drive and Rancho California Road at
Vincent Moraga. The amended traffic study shall be subject to
[he final approval of the Department of Public Works.
S~STAFFRPT~25059 ,PM
Revise Condition No. 41 to read as follows:
41.
Prior to issuance of the fiTSt building permit, the developer shall
enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City of Temecula
for the remaining percentage of the construction costs, above his
pro rata share, for construction of the signals, as warranted, for
Rancho California Road at Ridge Park Drive and Rancho California
Road at Vincent Moraga.
F. Revise Condition No. 42 to read as follows:
Prior to issuance of the first building permit, plans for traffic signal
interconnect shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
approved by the City Engineer along Rancho California Road from
Diaz Road to Ridge Park Drive.
G. Revise Condition No. 43 to read as follows:
43.
Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact the Department
of Public Works for the design requirements and the necessary
agreements.
Additionally, the following conditions should be changed to read "PRIOR TO THE
ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS:
H. Revise Condition No. 44 to read as follows:
Prior to occupancy of any portion of the site, all signing and
striping shall be installed and operational per the approved signin'g
and striping plan.
Revise Condition No. 45 to read as follows:
45.
Prior to occupancy of any portion of the site, the traffic signals for
the intersections of Rancho California Road at Ridge Park Drive
and Rancho California Road at Vincent Moraga shall be installed
and operational as warranted per the special provisions and the
approved traffic signal plan.
J. Revise Condition No. 46 to read as follows:
46.
Prior to occupancy of any portion of the site, all traffic signal
interconnects shall be installed per the approved plan and as
directed by the DeparTment of Public Works.
5%STAFFRPT~25059 .PM ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Plot Plan No: 3~
Project Description: 276,312.5 Square Foot
Office/Restaurant Development
AssessorLs Parcel Nos.: 9~0-310-033.03~.
and 037
Plannincl DeDaFtment
The use hereby permitted by this plot plan is for the development of a
276,312.5 square foot office/restaurant development containing one ( 1 ) seven
{7) story office building (102,2~3.5 square feet and 91 feet high); one (1)
7,872 square foot restaurant; one (1) four (L~) story parking structure
{13LL933 square fat); and a future building pad only for a proposed 7,000
square foot restaurant on a 5.51 acre site.
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of
Temecula, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or
proceeding against the City of Temacula or its agents, officers, or employees
to' attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City of Temecula, its
advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning Plot Plan
No. 3~. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the permittee of any such
claim. action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate
fully in the defense· If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any
such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the
permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold
harmless the City of Temecula.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of approval date; otherwise,
it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial
construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period
which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of
substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. This approval shall
expire on January 15, 1993.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as
shown on Plot Plan No. 3L~ marked Exhibit A, or as amended by these
conditions.
Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
The applicant shall comply with the Engineering Department's Conditions of
Approval which are included herein.
"" STAFFRPT\PP3LI 18
10.
Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, three (3) copies of a
Parking, Landscaping, Irrigation, and Shading Plans shall be submitted to the
Planning Department for approval. The location, number, genus, speci~-~
and container size of the P_Llants shall be shown. Plans shall meet
requirements of Ordinance No. 3~8, Section 18.12, and shall be accompanied
by the appropriate filing fee.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape,
irrigation, and shading plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. An
automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and all landscaped areas shall be
maintained in a viable growth condition. Planting within ten (10) feet of an
entry or exit driveway shall not be permitted to grow higher than thirty (30)
inches.
A minimum of 571 parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with Section
18,12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 3z~8. 571 parking spaces shall be
provided as shown on the Approved Exhibit B. The parking area shall be
surfaced with asphaltic concrete paving to a minimum depth of 3 inches on L~
inches of Class II base.
A minimum of B handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as shown on
Exhibit B. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be
identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain
on steel. beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of
Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and
shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height
if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade,
or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finisheeL
grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuo
piece, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility. not less than
inches i=}, 22 inches. clearly and conspicuously stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing
placards or license plates issued for physically
handicapped persons may be towed away at owner~s
expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at
or by telephone
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall
have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in
blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain clearance
and/or permits from the following agencies:
Planning Department School District
Engineering Department Riverside County Flood Control
Environmental Health Fire Department.
STAFF R PT\ PP3~ 19 ~
12.
13.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
A Plot Plan application for a Sign Program shall be submitted and approved by
the Planning Director prior to occupancy.
Building elevations shall be irf substantial conformance with that shown on
Exhibit C.
Materials used in the construction of all buildings shall be in substantial
conformance with that shown on Exhibit C (Color Elevations) and Exhibit D
{Materials Board), with the exception of the green monolithic glazing {Item
"B") which shall be non-reflective.
Roof-mounted equipment for the two (2) proposed restaurants shall be
shielded from ground view. Screening material shall be subject to Planning
Department approval.
No roof-mounted equipment shall be permitted for the proposed seven story
office building and four story parking structure within the pro)ect site.
All trash enclosures shall be constructed prior to the issuance of occupancy
permits. Each enclosure shall be six feet in height and shall be made with
masonry block and a steel gate which screens the bins from external view.
Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen canopy tr:=; along
streets and within the parking areas.
All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans
submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval
and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No
655. '
This project is located within the vicinity of a subsidence zone. Prior to
issuance of any building permit by the De/~artment of Building and Safety., a
letter of clearance from the Riverside County Geologist sh=ti be submitted or
a California Licensed Soils Engin::~ or Geologist shall submit a report to the
Building and Safety Department identifying the potential for subsidence.
Where hazard of subsidence is determined to exist, appropriate mitigation
measures must be demonstrated.
if determined to be within the Habitat Conservation Plan Study Area, prior to
the issuance of grading permits, .the applicant shall comply with Ordinance
No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance which is based on the
gross acreage of the parcels proposed for development. Should Ordinance No.
663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to
the payment of the fees required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall
pay the fee required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by
County ordinance or resolution.
23 Class I bicycle racks shall be provided in convenient locations as approved
by the Planning Director to facilitate bic~,cte access to the project area.
--- STAFFRPT\PP3q. 20
23.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, performance securities, in amounts
to be determined by the Director of Building and Safety to guarantee the
installation of planrings, walls, and fences in accordance with the approve.
plan, and adequate maintenance. of the Planting fo.r one year, shall be fi
with the Department of Building and Safety.
Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape planting
and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the
Director of Building and Safety. The plants shall be healthy and free of
weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed
and in good workin9 order.
25.
All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed
underground.
26.
Prior to the sale of any structure as shown on Exhibit D, a land division shall
be recorded in accordance with Riverside County Ordinance No./460 and any
other pertinent ordinance.
27.
28.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits and/or buildin9 permit, the developer
or his successor's interest shall submit a mitigation monitoring program which
shall describe how compliance with required mitigation measures will be met
and the appropriate monitoring timing of the mitigation. The applicant shall
reimburse the City for all monitoring activity cost.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or
any use allowed by this permit.
29.
The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-si"
property interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the developer sha,.
at least 120 days prior to submittal for building permit, enter into an
agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section
66/462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the
improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer
of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests
required in connection with the project. Security for a portion of these costs
shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal
report obtained by the developer, at the developePs cost. The appraiser
shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal.
3O.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, a certifi~Le of Parcel Merger or Lot
Line Adjustment shall be approved by the Engineering Department.
Riverside County Fire DelDartment
31o
The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure established in
Ordinance 5/46.
STAFFRPT\PP3L~ 21 -'-,
32.
33.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
~0.
Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 2000 CPM
for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must be
available before any combustible material is placed on the job site.
A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants ( 6"x~4"x2 1/2x2 1/2 ),
will be located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of
the building as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required
fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system.
The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process
to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation or built-in
fire protection measures.
Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings requiring a fire flow
of 1500 GPM or greater. The post indicator valve and fire department
connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a
minimum of 25 feet from the building( s) . A statement that the buildingl s) will
be automatically fire sprinklered must be included on the title pacje of the
building plans.
Install a supervised waterflow monitoring fire alarm system.
submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to
required by the Uniform Building Code.
Plans must be
installation, .as
A statement that the building will be automatically fire sprinklered must
appear on the title page of the building plans.
Install panic hardware and exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform
Building Code. Low-level exit signs, where exit signs are required by
Section 331q.( a) .
Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes.
Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC. Contact
a .certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall be
responsible to submit a check or money' order in the amount of $558.00 to the.
Riverside County Fire Department for plan check fees.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall deposit with the
Riverside County Fire Department, a check or money order equaling the sum
of 25 cents per square foot as mitiqation for fire protection impacts. This
amount must be submitted sel~arate~y from the plan check review fee.
Building "C" must meet highrise life safety requirements per Riverside County
Ordinance 5Lt6, Section 801, parking garage install Class II i standpipe system.
Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the
Building and Safety Office.
~__ STAFFRPT\pp3~ 22
Enqineerinc/Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for th;~,
project, and shall be completed at no_c~.st to any Government Agency. All questic
regarding the tru~ meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
The developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control district;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside County Health Department; and
CATV Franchise.
'The developer shall submit four (~) copies of a soils report to the Engineering
Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological
conditions of the site.
A grading permit shall be' obtained from the Engineering Department prior '
commencement of any grading outside of. the City-maintained road right-of
way.
50.
51.
52.
If grading is to take place between the .months of October and April, erosion
control plans will be required. Erosion control plans and notes shall be
submitted and approved by the Engineering Department.
Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid
and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer~s Office.
The developer shall provide clearance from all applicable agencies and pay all
fees prior to the approval of planS.
All work done within the City right-of-way shall have an encroachment permit.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing
Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The
charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits.
If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has aireacly credited to
this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
STAFFRPT\PP3~ 23
53.
A drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer.
All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer.
All concentrated drainage directed toward the public street shall be diverted
through the undersidewalk drains.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT:
55.
56.
A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Engineerin9 Department for
review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil
Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final
Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum as established per acre as mitigation for
traffic signal impact.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCy:
57. Street lights shall. be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. L~61 and as approved by the
City Engineer.
58.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. !f an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said agr==ment may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest
such increase.
TranslDortation Enclineerinq
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
Plans for a traffic signal shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
approved by the City Engineer for the intersection of Rancho California Road
and Ridge Park Drive.
60.
A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer for the intersection of Rancho California
Road and Ridge Park Drive. Based on the Traffic Study, these plans shall be
designed to provide for 300~ of left turn storage capacity on westbound
Rancho California Road to southbound Ridge Park Drive.
STA FFR PT\PP3t4
61.
The developer shall contribute L~6 percentage for the construction costs of the
signal at Rancho California Road and Ridge Park Drive.
62.
The developer may enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City for t~
remaining percentage of the corruption costs, above his pro rate share, f,
the signal at Rancho California Road and Ridge'Park Drive.
63.
Credit shall be given toward the developePs signal mitigation fees for the
design and construction of the signal at Ridge Park Drive and Rancho
California Road.
Plans for traffic signal interconnect shall be designed by a registered Civil
Engineer and approved by the City Engineer along Rancho California Road
from Diaz Road to Ridge Park Drive.
65.
Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering
for the design requirements.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS:
66.
All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and
striping plan.
67.
The traffic signal at Rancho California Road and Ridge Park Drive shall be
installed and operational per the special provisions, and the approved traffic
signal plan.
68.
All traffic signal interconnects shall be installed per the approved plan.
STAFFRPT\PP3q, 25 -~.
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS-OF APPROVAL
Tentative Parcel Map No: 25059
Project Description: Four I ~ ) Lot Industrial
Subdivision
Assessoris Parcel No.: 9L~0-310-033, 03L~
and 037
Planninci Deloartment
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision
Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 1&60, Schedule E, unless
modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in
accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request,
if made 30 days prior to the expiration date.
This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the
approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance z~60. The expiration
date is January 15, 1993.
The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all the
requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance
460.
Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final
map.
Legal access as required by Ordinance !,60 shall be provided from the tract
map boundary to a City maintained road.
All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall
continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers. -
All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City
Engineer· Street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities,
etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land
division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be
submitted and recorded as directed by the City Engineer.
Subdivision phasing, including any proposed common open space area
improvement phasing, if applicable, shai.I be subject. to Planning Department
approval. Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate vehicular access
to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially conform to the intent and
purpose of the subdivision approval.
~TAFFRPT\PP3~ 32
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
An Association shall be established for maintenance of Lot u,. Open
Space/Common Area and the developer/applicant shall pay for all costs
relating to establishment of the Pr__o. perty Owners Association.
A copy of the finai grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department
for review and approval. All on-site cut and fill slopes shall:
a. Be limited to a maximum slope ratio of 2 to 1 and a maximum vertical
height of thirty (30) feet. Setbacks from top and bottom of slopes shall
be a minimum of one-half the slope height.
b. Be contour-graded to blend with existing natural contours.
c. Be a part of the downhill lot when within or between individual lots.
All slopes over three {3) feet in height shall be landscaped and irrigated
according to the City Development Code. A detailed landscaping and
irrigation plan, prepared by a qualified professional, shall be submitted to the
City Planning Department for review and approval prior to issuance of grading
permits.
All proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of
Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy, as outlined in the
Southwest Area Plan.
Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following:
Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the~-~
development standards of the J-P {I ndustrial Park) zone.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free
condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or
provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the
Director of Building and Safety.
The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all slopes,
landscaped areas and irrigation systems until such time as those operations
are the responsibilities of other parties as approved by the Planning Director.
Prior to recordatlon of the' final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet
(ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate
identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the
office of the City Engineer. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the
Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be
forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department
and the Department of Building and Safety.
STAFFRPT\PP3q. 33
16.
Prior to the issuance of C;RAD INC PERMITS the followin9 conditions shall be
satisfied:
Prior to the issuance of gra'd~ng permits detailed common. open space
area landscaping and irrigation plans shall 'be submitted for Planning
Department approval for the phase of development in process. The
plans shall be certified by a landscape architect,. and shall provide for
the following:
Permanent automatic irrigation systems shall be installed on all
landscaped areas requiring irrigation.
Landscape screening where required shall be designed to be-
opaque up to a minimum height of six (6) feet at maturity.
All utility service areas and enclosures shall be screened from
view with landscaping and decorative barriers or baffle
treatments, as approved by the Planning Director. Utilities shall
be placed underground.
Parkways shall be landscaped to provide visual screening or a
transition into the primary use area of the site. Landscape
elements shall include earth bermin9, ground cover, shrubs and
specimen tr==--. Front yards shall be landscaped and street tr=::
planted.
ee
Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent
trees at key visual focal points within the project.
Where street trees cannot be planted within right-of-way of
interior streets and project parkways due to insufficient road
right-of-way, they shall be planted outside of the road right-of-
way.
Landscaping plans shall incorporate native and drought tolerant
plants where appropriate.
All existing specimen trees and significant rock outcroppings on'
the subject property shall be shown on the projectts grading
plans and shall note those to be removed, relocated and/or
retained.
All trees shall be minimum double staked. Weaker and/or slow
growing trees shall be steel staked.
~" STAFFRPT\PP3L~ 3~
If the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of grading
permits, an overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to
the Planning Director for approval. The plan shall be used as~.~
guideline for subsequent detailed grading plans for individL
phases of development and shall include the following:
Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion and
sedimentation during and after the grading process.
Approximate time frames for grading and identification of
areas which may be graded during the higher probability
rain months of January through March·
3. Preliminary pad and roadway elevations.
Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase.
All cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded natural terrain and
exceeding ten (10) feet in vertical height shall be contour-
graded incorporating the following grading techniques:
The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted
to the angle of the natural terrain·
Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded form
shall reflect the natural rounded terrain.
3. The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves~
with radii designed in proportion to the total height of th
slopes where drainageand stability permit such rounding.
Where cut or fill slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal
length,' the horizontal contours of the slope shall be
curved in a continuous, undulating fashion.
I. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the 'developer shall
provide evidence to the Director of Building and Safety that all
adjacent off-site manufactured slopes have recorded slope
easements and that slope maintenance responsibilities have been
assigned as approveci by the Director of Building and Safety.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall be
retained by the developer for consultation and comment on the proposed
grading with respect to potential paleontologicel impacts. Should the
paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to significant resources, a
pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist and the excavation and grading
contractor shall be arranged. When necessary, the paleontologist or
representative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt
grading activity to allow recovery of fossils.
STAFFRPT\Pp3~ 35 ---
18.
19.
20.
21.
Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
Prior to the submittal of buil'c[ing plans to the Department of Building
and Safety an acoustical'study shall be performed by an acoustical
engineer to establish appropriate mitigation measures that shall be
applied to' individual dwelling units within the subdivision to reduce
ambient interior noise levels to 45 Ldn,
All building plans for all new structures shall incorporate, all required
elements from the subdivision~s approved fire protection plan as
approved by'the County Fire Marshal.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, composite landscaping and
irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval.
The plans shall address all areas and aspects the tract requiring
landscaping and irrigation to be installed including, but not limited to,
parkway planting, street trees, slope planting, and individual front
yard landscaping.
Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions
be satisfied:
All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with
approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. If seasonal
conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and erosion
control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director
and the Director of Building and Safety.
All landscaping and irrigation shall be instalied in accordance with
approved plans and shall be verified by City field inspection.
Not withstanding the preceding conditions, wherever an acoustical
study is required for noise attenuation purposes, the heights of all
required walls shall be determined by the acoustical study where
applicable.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the
provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in
that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. :663 be superseded by the provisions
of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by
Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat
Conservation 'Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of
Temecula, its agents, officer, and employees from any claim, action, or
proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees
to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its
advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Tentative
Parcel Map No. 25059, which action is brought within the time period provided
· "'STAFFRPT\pp3~ 36
for in California Government Code Section 66z199.37. The City of TemecUla will
promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding
against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If *~,
City fails to promptly notify_the subdivider of any such claim, action,
proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall r/or,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of
Temecula.
22.
The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site
property interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the developer shall
at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into
an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code
Section 66~62 at such time as the City acquires the property interests
required for the improvements. Such agr==ment shall provide for payment by
the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the uFF-site property
interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion
of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an
appraisal report obtained by the developer, at the developer~s cost. The
appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the
appraisal.
All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable
TV shall be provided for underground, with easements provided as required,
and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility
provided. Telephone, cable TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired
in the residence.
All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed~
underground.
Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions/Reciprocal Access Easements:
25.
The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CCF, R's)'shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department prior to final approval of the tract
maps. The CCF, R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining
the open space. ra:reation areas, parking areas, private roads, and exterior
of all buildings.
26.
No lot dr dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation,
association, property owner~s group, or similar entity has been formed with
the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which
have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common
facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet
the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to
maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such
entity shall operate under recorded CCF, R~s which shall include compulsory
membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of
assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, 'repairs, and services.
Recorded CCF, R's shall permit enforcement by the City of Provisions required
by the City-as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence
STAFFR PT\PP3~ 37 ~
27.
of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior
to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to
the City for public purposes.
~Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such
dwelling unit or lot, either ( 1 ) an undivided interest in the common areas and
facilities, or {2) as share in the corporation, or voting membership in an
association, owning the common areas and facilities.
2B.
Maintenance for all landscaped and open areas, including parkways, shall be
provided for in the CCSR~s.
Enqineerincl Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
29.
The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act,
and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions.'
3O.
The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered
Civil Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the State of California
Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. 460.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
31. The developer shall receive written clearance from the following acjencies:
m
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control district;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;- ·
Riverside County Health Department; and
CATV Franchise.
Ca!Trans
~'~ STAFFRPT\PP3~ 38
32.
33.
A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions I CC&R's) shall be
prepared by the developer and submitted to the Director of Planning. City
Engineer and City Attorney. The CCSRIs shall be signed and acknowledg---k
by all parties having any record4itle interest in the property to be develope
shall make the City a party thereto, and shall be enforceable by' the City.
The CCI;R~s shall be reviewed and approved by the City and recorded. The
CCSR's shall be subject to the following conditions:
a. The CCF, RIs shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and expense.
b. The CCSRIs shall be in the form and content approved by the Director
of Planning, City Engineer and the City Attorney, and shall include
such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials
deem necessary to protect the interest of the City and its residents.
c. The CC8;R~s and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner's
Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engin::ring
Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent
with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City.
d. The CCSR~s shall provide for the effective establishment, ope, ,Lion,
management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas and
facilities. '
fe
The CCSRIs shall provide that the property shall be developed,
operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance.
The CCSR's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the-,
condition required by the CCF, R's, then the City, after making dL
demand and giving reasonable notice. may enter the property ano
perform,' at the owneris sole expense, any maintenance required
thereon by the CC&R's or the City ordinances. The property shall be
subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not
promptly reimbursed.
Street lights shall be provided along street.~ soSjoining the subject Site in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. 461 and as approved by the
City Engineer.
Prior to recordation of the fina; map, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation
towards traffic signal imOa,.~s. Should the developer choose to defer the time
of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written
agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a
building perTnit.
~. FAFFRPT\Pp3z~ 39 ~"'
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
35.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or pro~ct, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest
such increase.
T ranslDortation Enclineerinq
PRIOR TO RECORDATION:
36.
Plans for a traffic signal shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
approved by the City Engineer for the intersection of Rancho California Road
and Ridge Park Drive.
37.
A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer for the intersection of Rancho California
Road and Ridge Park Drive. Based on the Traffic Study, these plans shall be
designed to provide for 300' of left turn storage capacity on westbound
Rancho California Road to southbound Ridge Park Drive.
38.
Credit shall be given toward the developers signal mitigation fees for the
design and construction of the signal at Ridge Park Drive and Rancho
California Road.
39.
The developer shall contribute u,6 percentage for the construction costs of the
signal at Rancho California Road and Ridge Park Drive.
The developer may enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City for the
remaining percentage of the construction costs, above his pro rata share, for
.'the signal at Rancho California Road and Ridge Park Drive.
Plans for traffic signal interconnect Shall be designed by a registered Civil
Engineer and approved by the City Engineer along Rancho California Road
from Diaz Road to Ridge Park Drive.
Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering
for the design requirements.
STAFFRPT\PP3~ 40
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS:
All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved 'signing and
striping plan. -----
z14. The traffic signal at Rancho California Road and Ridge Park Drive shall be
installed and operational per the special provisions and the approved traffic
signal plan.
LIS. All traffic signal interconnects shall be installed per the approved plan.
STAFFRPT\PP3~ ~1
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
JULY 19, 1993 AND AUGUST 2, 1993
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORTS
R:~S~,STAFFRFT'~gPA93.CC 8120/93 vOw 16
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF -TEMECULA
· PLANNING COMMISSION
July 19, 1993
PA93-0009, Tentative Parcel Map 25059, First Extension of Time
Prepared By: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission:
APPROVE PA93-0009, Tentative Parcel Map 25059, First
Extension of Time Subject to the Attached Conditions of
Approval.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Preferred Equities
REPRESENTATIVE:
Anthony Polo
PROPOSAL:
A request for a one year time extension for Tentative Parcel Map
25059, a four lot subdivision of 5.51 acres.
LOCATION:
Westerly side of Ridge Park Drive, approximately 70 feet south
of Rancho California Road.
EXISTING ZONING:
I-P (Industrial Professional)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
PROPOSED LAND USE
DESIGNATION:
North:
South:
East:
West:
I-P (Industrial Professional)
I-P (Industrial Professional)
I-P (Industrial Professional)
i-P (Industrial Professional)
Business Park
EXISTING LAND USE:
Vacant
SURROUNDING
LAND USES:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
R:~S~STAFFRPT~PA93.PC 7114/93 Idb
BACKGROUND
The proposed project was previously approved-by the Temecula City Council on January 15,
1991. The project was processed and approved concurrently with Plot Plan No. 34.
Pursuant to the recently modified Approval Authority Ordinance, all extensions of time are
now heard by the Planning Commission as Consent Calendar Items.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project is for the subdivision of 5.51 acres into four parcels. The proposed parcels will
accommodate one office building, two restaurants and a four level parking structure. The
building pads have previously been mass graded as part of the underlying map.
ANALYSIS
The primary issue for this project has been the adding off a new condition of approval relevant
to the Western Bypass Corridor. Condition No. 18 states "The Developer shall record a
written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object to the formation of an Assessment
District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for
the construction of the proposed "Western Bypass Corridor." The form of the offer shall be
subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney." All new and previously
approved projects subject to City approval that may impact the Western Bypass Corridor have
been required to meet this condition.
ZONING, FUTURE GENERAL PLAN AND SWAP CONSISTENCY
The project site is zoned Industrial Professional (I-P) and adjacent parcels are also zoned I-P.
The proposed Draft General Plan Land Use Designation is Business Park. The SWAP
designation is Restricted Light Industrial. The proposed project is consistent with the
requirements of the I-P Zone and Ordinance No. 348.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
For the original approval of this project a Negative Declaration was issued under the CEQA
guidelines. The project is unchanged from that which was originally approved. Therefore, nO
fuPther environmental assessment on PA93-0009, Tentative Parcel Map No. 25059, First
Extension of Time is required. Mitigation measures contained in the conditions of approval
will mitigate potential impacts which will be created by the project.
S UMMARYICONCLUSIONS
The proposed project was previously approved by the City of Temecula. The project before
the Commission is unchanged from that which was previously approved. Minor changes to
the Conditions of Approval have been made to comply with new laws and City ordinances and
to protect the general health and safety of the citizens of Temecula.
The proposed project is consistent with the presen~ and future zoning and General Plan Land
Use Designations. All potential environmental impacts were addressed during the previous
approval and mitigations were incorporated into the conditions of approval.
F~S~STAFFRFT%BPAe3.PC 7114/93 Idb 2
FINDINGS
The findings for the original approval for Tentative Parcel Map No. 25059 are found
to remain valid except as amended her. in.
e
No subsequent changes are proposed in the project which would require revisions to
the previously certified Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant
environmental impacts not considered in the previously approval of this project.
3. No new information of substantial importance to the project has become available.
e
There is a reasonable probability that Tentative Parcel Map No, 25059, First Extension.
of Time will be consistent with the City's Draft General Plan, which will be completed
in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law, The Draft General Plan Land
use designation for the site is Business Park, The proposed development is consistent
with the Business Park zone.
The proposed use or action complies with State planning and zoning laws. The
proposed use complies with City of Temecula Ordinance No. 348 and Ordinance 460·
The site is sLiitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and intensity of use, due
to the fact that the Proposed subdivision complies with the standards of Ordinance No,
348 and Ordinance 460.
e
The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or
welfare, due to the fact that the Conditions of Approval include mitigation measures.
The project is compatible with surrounding proposed land uses. The harmony in scale,
bulk, height, intensity, and coverage creates a compatible physical relationship with
adjoining properties, due to the fact that similar uses are proposed for properties in the
vicinity of this project.
e
The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does
not represent a significant change to the planned land use of the area, due to the fact
'that the proposed use is compatible proposed land use designation of Business Park.
All lots have acceptable access to existing and proposed dedicated right-of-ways which
are open to, and are us.able by, vehicular traffic as evidenced on the Tentative Parcel
Map showing access to Ridge Park Drive·
11.
Said findings are supported by maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated
with these applications and herein incorporated by reference.
Attachments:
Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 4
Previously Adopted Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 8
Exhibits - Blue Page 9.
A. Vicinity Map
B. SWAP Map
C. Zoning Map
R:~S~STAFFRPT%gPA93.PC 7114/g3 Idb 3
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF q'EMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
July 19, 1993
PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, First Extension of Time
Prepared By: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission:
APPROVE PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, First Extension
of Time Subject to the Attached Conditions of Approval.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Preferred Equities
REPRESENTATIVE:
Anthony Polo
PROPOSAL:
A re~luest for a one year time extension for Plot Plan No. 34, a
seven (7) story office building totaling 102,243 square feet, a
7,872 square foot restaurant, a four (4) level parking structure
containing 134,933 square feet, and a building pad for a
proposed 7,000 square foot restaurant on 5.51 acres·
LOCATION:
Westerly side of Ridge Park Drive, approximately 70 feet south
of Rancho California Road.
EXISTING ZONING:
I-P (Industrial Professional)
SURROUNDING
ZONING:
North:
South:
East:
West:
I-P (Industrial Professional)
I-P (Industrial Professional)
I-P (Industrial Professional)
I-P (Industrial Professional)
PROPOSED LAND USE
DESIGNATION:
Business Park
EXISTING LAND USE:
Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North: Vacant
South: Vacant
East: Vacant
West: Vacant
BACKGROUND
The proposed project was previously approved by the Temecula City Council on January 15,
1991. The project was processed and approved concurrently with Tentative Parcel Map No..
25059.
Pursuant to the recently modified Approval Authority Ordinance, all extensions of time are
now heard by the Planning Commission as Consent Calendar items.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project is a request for a one year time extension for Plot Plan No. 34 which includes a
seven (7) story office building totaling 102,243 square feet, a 7,872 square foot restaurant,
a four (4) level parking structure containing 134,933 square feet, and a building pad for a
proposed 7,000 square foot restaurant on 5.51 acres.
ANALYSIS
The primary issue for this project has been adding a new condition relevant to the Western
Bypass Corridor. Condition No. 18 states "The Developer shall record a written offer to
participate in, and waive all rights to object to the formation of an Assessment District, a
Community Facilities District, or a Bridge end Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the
construction of the proposed "Western Bypass Corridor." The form of the offer shall be
subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney. All new and previously
approved projects subject to City approval that may impact the Western Bypass Corridor have
been required to meet this condition.
ZONING, FUTURE GENERAL PLAN AND SWAP CONSISTENCY
Thb project site is zoned Industrial Professional (l-P) and adjacent parcels are also zoned I-P.
The proposed Draft General Plan Land Use Designation is Business Park. The SWAP
designation is Restricted Light Industrial. The proposed project is consistent with the
requirements of the I-P Zone and Ordinance No. 348.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
For the original approval of this project a Negative Declaration was issued under the CEQA
guidelines. The project is unchanged from that which was originally approved. Therefore, no
further environmental assessment on PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, First Extension of Time
is required. Mitigation measures contained in the conditions of approval will mitigate potential
impacts which will be created by the project.
R:NSXSTAPPRFI~IOPA93.PC 7114/93 Idb 2
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The proposed project was previously approved-by the City of Temecula. The project before
the Commission is unchanged from that which was previously approved. Minor changes to
the Conditions of Approval have been made to comply with new laws and City ordinances and
to protect the general health and safety of the citizens of Temecula.
FINDINGS
The findings for the original approval for Plot Plan No. 34 are found to remain valid
except as amended her. in.
No subsequent changes are proposed in the project which would require revisions to
the previously certified Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant
environmental impacts not considered in the previous approval of this project,
3. No new information of substantial importance to the project has become available.
There is a reasonable probability that PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, First Extension of
Time, will be consistent with the City's Draft General Plan, which will be completed
in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law. The Draft General Plan Land
use designation for the site is Business Park. The proposed development is consistent
with the Business Park zone.
The proposed use or action complies with State planning and zoning laws. The
proposed use complies with City of Temecula Ordinance No. 348 and Ordinance 460.
e
The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and intensity of use, due
to the fact that the proposed subdivision complies with the standards of Ordinance No.
348 and Ordinance 460.
The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the'public health or
welfare, due to the fact that the Conditions of Approval include mitigation measures.
The project is compatible with surrounding proposed land uses. The harmony in scale,
bulk, height, intensity, and coverage creates a compatible physical relationship with
adjoining properties, due to the fact that similar uses are proposed for properties in the
vicinity of this project.
The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does
not represent a significant change to the planned land use of the area, due to the fact
that the proposed use is compatible with the proposed land use designation of
Business Professional.
10.
All lots have acceptable accessto existing and proposed dedicated right-of-ways which
are open to, and are us.able by, vehicular traffic as evidenced on the Tentative Parcel
Map showing access to Ridge Park Drive.
R:~qTAFFRFBI0PA93.1ae 7114/93 lab 3
11.
Said findings are supported by maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated
with these applications and herein incorporated by reference.
Attachments:
Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 5
Previously Adopted Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 9
Exhibits - Blue Page 10
A. Vicinity Map
B. SWAP Map
C. Zoning Map
lt:~S'r~t0~A93.1~C 7114/93 I~b 4
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning Commission
Gary Thornhill, Planning Director
August 2, 1993
PA93-0009, Tentative Parcel Map No. 25059, First Extension of Time and
PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, First Extension of Time
Prepared by:
RECOMMENDATION:
Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission:
RE-AFFIRM The previously adopted Negative Declaration
for Tentative Parcel Map 25059; and
APPROVE PA93-0009, Tentative Parcel Map 25059, First
Extension of Time Subject to the Attached Conditions of
Approval; and
RE-AFFIRM The previously adopted Negative Declaration
for Plot Plan No. 34; and
APPROVE PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, First Extension
of Time Subject to the Attached Conditions of Approval.
BACKGROUND
On January 15, 1991, the City of Temecula City Council approved the above referenced
projects· On October 7, 1991, the City of Temecula Planning Commission approved a Minor
Change application for Tentative Parcel Map 25059.
These two items were previously heard at the July 19, 1993 Planning Commission meeting.
The Commission continued the item to the August 2, 1993 Commission meeting and directed
staff to clarify the status of the minor change as it relates to this proposal ant to traffic signal
mitigation.
R:~S~STAFFRPT~gPA93.PC2 7127/93 tj~
DISCUSSION
Previous Conditions of Aooroval
The October 7, 1991 approval of the Minor Change for Tentative Parcel Map 25059 modified
nine Public Works conditions of approval relative to traffic signals and traffic striping. The
amended conditions provide for an additional traffic signal and the associated striping at the
intersection of Rancho California Road and Vincent Moraga Drive while deferring the traffic
conditions to the building permit stage.
The Planning Commission expressed concern that the amended conditions, due to the minor
change, were not included in their July 19, 1993 staff report. Subsequently, the previously
amended conditions of approval have been included in the August 2, 1993 staff report and
remain valid except where superseded by the current conditions of approval.
Lenath of Extension of Time
At the July 19, 1993 meeting, the applicant's representative stated that because the project
is conditioned to provide for offsite improvements in an amount in excess of $100,000, an
automatic three year extension should be granted.
However, Section 66452.6 of the Subdivision Map Act specifies that: "if the subdivider is
required to expend one hundred twenty-five thousand dollars ($125,000) or more to
construct, improve, or finance the construction or improvement of public improvements
outside the property boundaries of the tentative map, excluding improvements of public rights-
of-way which abut the boundary of the property to be subdivided and which are reasonably
related to the development of that property, each filing of a final map shall extend the
expiration of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map by 36 months from the
date of its expiration or the date of the previously filed final map, whichever is later."
To date, the applicant has not met the following requirements for a three year extension of
time:
1. The filing of a final map
The filing of multiple final maps as part of a phased project
The expenditure of $125,000
If, at the final map stage, the applicant meets the above requirements the three year extension
may be granted at that time. Consequently, the applicant's request for the three year
extension is inapplicable at this stage of the approval process.
New Conditions of Aooroval
The applicant feels that the adding of new conditions of approval to the project is
unwarranted. However, Public Works staff recommends that the approval of the extension
be subject to additional conditions as presented to the Planning Commission at the July 19,
1993 hearing, in compliance with the City's current standards and as required to protect the
general health and safety of the community.
R:%S~STAFFRPl~9PA93,PC2 7127/93 tie 2
Attachments:
Conditions of Approval - Blue Page
Previously Adopted Conditions of Approval - Blue Page
Exhibits - Blue Page
A. Vicinity Map
R:~S\STAFFRPT~PA93.PC2 7/27/93 tie 3
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
JULY 19, 1993 AND AUGUST 2, 1993
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
R:~,S%STAFFRPT~gPA93,CC 9120/93 vgw 17
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: I COMMISSIONERS:
DRAFT
JULY 19, 1993
None
Blair
2.2
Approval of June 21, 1993 Planning Commission Minutes.
It was moved by Commissioner Chiniaeff, seconded by Commissioner Hoagland
to approve the minutes of the June 7, 1993 Planning Commission meeting.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: I COMMISSIONERS: Blair
NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Items No. 3 and No. 4 were presented to the Planning Commission jointly.
3. PA93-0009. First Exlension of Time for Tentative Parcel Mao No. 25059
A proposal for a four lot subdivision of a 5.51 acre site in the Industrial Park (I-P) Zone.
Located on the westerly side of Ridge Park Drive, approximately 70 feet southerly of
Rancho California Road.
4. PA93-0010. Extension of Time for Plot Plan No. 34
A proDosal"to construct a seven story office .building (102,243 square feet), two
restaurants and (7,872 square feet and 7,000 sc~uare feet) on a four-level parking
structure (134,933 square feet) on 5.51 acres. Located on the westerly side of Ridge
Park Drive, approximately 70 feet southerly of Rancho California Road.
Anthony Polo, Avalon Consultants, 42200 Hacienda Drive, Murrieta, representing the
applicant, Preferred Equities Development Corporation, advised staff and the
Commission that there is an approved minor change on the map from October 1991
which is not reflected in the Conditions of Approval. Mr. Polo asked for clarification
regarding the length of the time extension. Mr. Polo stated that Ordinance 460 and
the Subdivision Map Act allows for a three year extension if the developer is
conditioned to build $100,000 or more of off-site improvements. Mr. Polo stated that
this map is conditioned to build two signals off-site.
PCMIN0711 BI93 -2- 7121fi3
DRAFT
It wasmoved by Commissioner Hoagland to cominue this i~em for two weeks to allow
staff end the applicant an opportuni~/'i'6:resolve their issues.
The motion failed due to lack of a second.
Principal Engineer Ray Casey advised the Commission that staff's interpretation of the
latest Subdivision Map Act, dictates that 3 year extensions are based on the first map
being recorded in a phased manner, which has not happened with this applicant.
Anthony Polo stated that the applicant has been conditioned to support the Western
By-Pass Corridor which the applicant approves of in general, however, the applicant
feels that the condition is not applicable because A) it has not been approved as part
of the General Plan and; B) because it has not been approved as part of the General
Plan the developer is concerned with any changes to the corridor. Mr. Polo stated that
the developer requests the right to oppose the proposed Western By-Pass Corridor
should it negatively impact the property. Mr. Polo stated that added conditions are
held to General Plan amendments or health and safety issues and the applicant does
not feel the multiple changes which he has been given address General Plan
amendments or health and safety issues.
Planning Director Gary Thornhill stated that the Western By-Pass Corridor is a
significant feature of the General Plan and the City Council and Planning Commission
have approved it by consensus.
Commissioner Chiniaeff suggested amending the condition to read "subject to the
adoption of the General Plan".
Director Thornhill advised that should the plan not be adopted, the Condition would not
be applicable.
Principal Engineer Ray Casey advised the Commission that staff has concerns regarding
erosion control and additional NPDS requirements. Mr. Casey stated that staff feels
these issues apply to the general health, safety and welfare.
It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Chiniaeff to
continue Item No. 3 and Item No. 4 to the meeting of August 2, 1993.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
4 COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey
NOES:
0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: I
COMMISSIONERS: Blair
PCMIN07119193 -3- 7121
DRAFT
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
AUGUST ~. 1993
PAg3-OQ09. first Fxtension of Time for Tentative Parcel MaD No, ~5059 end PA93-
0010, Extension of Time for Plot Plan No. 34
Proposal for a four lot subdivision of a 5,51 acre site in the Industrial Park (I-P) zone
and to construct a seven story office building {102,243 s.f,), two restaurants (7,872
s.f. and 7,000 s,f.) and a four-level parking structure.
This project was continued from the July 19, 1993 Planning Commission Meeting.
Planner Craig Ruiz presented the case.
Commissioner Chiniaeff inquired about the applicants expenditure of funds. Ray Casey
from the Department of Public Works, stated that no funds had been spent to date for
improvements or financing through an Assessment District.
The representative, Anthony Polo, AveIon Consultants, questioned Planning staff's
ability to add new conditions to the project. Mr. Polo also argued that the added
conditions did not relate to the health and safety of the citizens of Temecula nor to the
General Plan. In addition, Mr. Polo felt that because he was required to provide public
facilities which would cost in excess of $125,000 the project was entitled .to a three
year extension of time.
Staff stated that the applicant did not meet the three requirements necessary to
receive a three year extension of time. The applicant had not (1) expanded $125,000,
(2) a final map was not recorded, and {3) the project was not part of a phased final
map.
Commissioner Chiniaeff stated that the conditions added to the project were standard.
Assistant City Attorney John Cavanaugh stated that the City has the authority to
impose new conditions of approval to a previously approved tentative map through the
· extension of time process.
It was moved by Commissioner Fahey, seconded by Commissioner Chiniaeff to
approve PA93-0009, first extension of time for Tentative Tract Map No. 25059 and
PA93-0101, First Extension of Time for Plot Plan No. 225.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoegland and Fahey
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
F~S%PLANC0klAPClaNB-2.I3 9115ti3. t~ 4
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
EXHIBITS
R:~S%.STAFFRPT~gPA93.CC 9120/93 vgw 18
CITY OF TEMECULA
~ SIrTE
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT: A
P.C. DATE:
PA93-0009
SEPTEMBER 20, 1993
VICINITY MAP
R:~S~STAFFRPT~9PA93.CC 9120/93 vow 19
ITEM 17
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Council/City Manager
'~' 'im D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
~T
October 26, 1993
SUBJECT:
Vacation of a Portion of Second Street
PREPARED BY:~(~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE VACATION OF A
PORTION OF SECOND STREET SOUTHWESTERLY OF FRONT
STREET PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY PROVIDED BY CHAPTER
3, PART 3, DIVISION 9 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS
CODE.
BACKGROUND:
On March 23, 1993 the City of Temecula Planning Director approved Minor Conditional Use
Permit No. PA93-0030, Amendment No. 3. The permit is for a western dance hall to be
located in an existing 27,164 square foot building. The vacation of a portion of Second Street
is a requirement of Condition of Approval No. 37 of said Minor Conditional Use Permit
PA93-0030, Amendment No. 3.
On September 28, 1993 the City Council approved Resolution No. 93-80, being a Resolution
of Intention to vacate said portion of Second Street, and setting a public hearing date, said
date being October 26, 1993.
In accordance with the provisions of the said Resolution of Notice of Intention to vacate a
portion of Second Street (Res. No. 93-80) and the requirements of the Streets and Highways
Code, the City Clerk had posted a "Notice of Public Hearing" in three (3) public places in the
City of Temecula within fifteen (15) days of the adoption of Resolution No. 93-80, and had
posted a "Notice of Hearing" along the street to be considered to be vacated, in accordance
I ~gdrpt%g3%1026%aecondvac
with Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 9 of the Streets and' Highway Code, and has certified to the
posting of said "Notice of Public Hearing" noted above.
Necessary access to public utility and public service facilities for the purposes of constructing,
placing, operating, inspecting, maintaining, repairing, replacing, and removing of such aerial
and underground facilities will be provided by reserving an easement for these purposes
as provided under Section 8330 of the Streets and Highways Code.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. 93-
with Exhibits "A-F", inclusive.
2 %agdrpt%93% 1026%mecondvec
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE VACATION OF
A PORTION OF SECOND STREET SOUTHWESTERLY OF
FRONT STREET PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY PROVIDED
BY CHAPTER 3, PART 3, DIVISION 9 OF THE STREETS AND
HIGHWAYS CODE.
WHEREAS, it appearing to the satisfaction of the City Council of the City of Temecula,
California, that a resohtion of intent to vacate the hereafter portion of Second Street was duly
and regularly passed by the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 26th day of October,
1993, and that said resolution was posted in three (3) public places pursuant to Resolution No.
90-60, not more than fifteen (15) days from the date of passage or less than ten (10) days before
the time of the hearing on the said proposed vacation; and that a "Notice of Public Hearing' was
posted along the street to be considered for vacation in accordance with Chapter 3, Part 3,
Division 9 of the Streets and Highways Code and that said hearing on the proposed vacation
having regularly come before the City Council for hearing on the 26th day of October 1993, at
the hour of 7:00 P.M. on said day, the City Council having found from all the evidence
submitted that the hereinafter described portion of Second Street is unnecessary for present or
prospective street purpose.
NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby ordered that the portion of Second Street shown and
described on attachments "A -F" inclusive, is hereby vacated.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Temecula does herewith reserve over
and upon the proposed vacation an easement to construct, maintain, operate, replace, remove
and renew sanitary sewers and storm drains and appurtenant structures in, upon, over, and
across a street or highway proposed to be vacated and, pursuant to any existing franchise or'
renewals thereof, or otherwise, to construct, maintain, operate, replace, remove, renew, and
enlarge lines of pipe, conduits, cables, wires, poles and other convenient structures, equipment,
and fixtures for the operation of gas pipelines, telegraphic and telephone lines, railroad lines,
and for the transportation or distribution of electric energy, petroleum and its products,
ammonia, and water, and for incidental purposes, including access to protect these works from
all hazards in, upon, and over the street easement thereof herein vacated.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shah cause a certified copy of this
resolution of vacation, attested by the City Clerk, to be recorded in the office of the Recorder
of the County of Riverside.
209
APPROVED AND ADO~ this 26th day of October, 1993.
J. Sal Munoz, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on .the 26th day of October,
1993, by the following vote of the Council:
CO~CIIAdEMBERS:
NOES:
CO~CILMEMB~:
COUNCILM~MBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
3FRelo~ 2O9
Exhibit "A"
Legal Description for Road Vacation
Temecula Townsite,S. D. Co. MB 15/726
That portion of Second Street in the Townsite of Temecula, County
of Riverside, along with that portion of Front-Street vacated by
resolution of the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County per
inst. no. 46491, recorded April 23, 1975, also that portion of Lot
12 in Block 30 and that portion of Front Street per Declaration of
Dedication recorded January 24,1980 as inst. no. 15986, as shown by
map on file in Book 15 of Maps, page 726, in the office of the
County Recorder, County of San Diego, State of California described
as follows:
Commencing at the centerline intersection of Second Street and
Front Street as shown on said map; thence South 44°30'26'' West
along the centerline of Second Street 30 feet to the True Point of
Beginning; thence South 45°29'34'' East 45 feet; thence South
89~30'26'' West 21.21 feet to a point on the southeasterly right of
way of Second Street; thence South 44~30'26'' West along said right
of way 270 feet; thence leaving said right of way North 45~29'34''
West 30 feet to a point on the centerline of Second Street; thence
North 44~30'26'' East along said centerline 285 feet to the True
Point of Beginning.
See Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by this reference made a part
hereof.
VflC~iTIOA! OF fl PORTION OF ~q/~CONO'~TE~T
EXHI BIT "0"
- C OHHENC [N~ p~ArF
FRONT
TRU~ POINr OF
~ 8EGIAIIVINR.
~qTRE~ T
~ 45 °~9'34"~
~0' \
EIVEE ~qTEEET
( HUEEIETfl
CU~AIr ~r4
Exhibit-"C
Legal Description for Road Vacation
Temecula Townsite, S. D. Co. MB 15/726
That portion of Second Street in the Townsite of Temecula, in the
County of Riverside, as shown by map on file in Book 15 of Maps,
page 726, in the office of the County Recorder, County of San
Diego, State of California described as follows:
Commencing at the centerline intersection of Second Street and
Front Street as shown on said map; thence South 44°30'26'' West
along the centerline of Second Street 115 feet to the True Point of
Beginning; thence continuing South 44°30'26'' West 200 feet; thence
leaving said centerline North 45°29'34'' West 30 feet to a point on
the northwesterly right of way of Second Street; thence North
44~30'26'' East along said right of way 200 feet; thence leaving
said right of way South 45~29'34'' East 30 feet to the True Point of
Beginning.
See Exhibit "D", attached hereto and by this reference made a part
hereof.
VIiOZITION OF ~ POET ION -OF' ,.qEeOA!O ,.qTPEgT
6XHI~IT "0 '
RIV~'I~ 9TREET
t MUeelETfl tEEEe )
[(,lENT g,F,4
Exhibit "E"
Legal Description for Road Vacation
Temecula Townsite, S. D. Co. MB 15/726
That portion of Second Street, in the Townsite of Temecula, County
of Riverside, along with that portion of Front Street vacated by
resolution of the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County per
inst. no. 46491, recorded April 23, 1975, as shown by map on file
in Book 15 of Maps, page 726, in the office of the County Recorder,
County of San Diego, State of California described as follows:
Commencing at the centerline intersection of Second Street and
Front Street as shown on said map; thence South 44°30'26'' West
along the centerline of Second Street 30 feet to the True Point of
Beginning; thence continuing along said centerline South 44°30'26''
West 85 feet; thence leaving said centerline North 45°29'34'' West
30 feet to the northwesterly right of way of Second Street; thence
along said right of way North 44~30'26'' East 85 feet; thence South
45o29'34'' East 30 feet to the True Point of Beginning.
See Exhibit "F", attached hereto and by this reference made a part
hereof.
VZICllTIOAI OF-",cl PORTION OF ,.qt~COND &TEEET
~'Xl. llarr "F"
FRONT co,.,~.,~c,,,~ ~vr ,.q TREE T
O~' 8~"~INNIN~.
a~
ITEM
NO.
18
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
October 26, 1993
City of Temecula General Plan, Implementation Program, Environmental Impact
Report and Mitigation Monitoring Program.
PREPARED BY:
- John Meyer and David Hogan
RECOMMENDATION:
It is requested that the City Council:
Open the public hearing and receive public testimony;
Review the Housing Element, remaining Clean-up Items, Environmental Impact
Report, Mitigation Monitoring Program and Statement of Overriding
Considerations, and direct staff to incorporate any changes into the final
General Plan; and,
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE
GENERAL PLAN AND ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA.
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OE THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE CITY
OF TEMECULA.
State Deadline for General Plan Adoption: November 25, 1993
R:~S\GENPLAN~GPCCi0 10118193 Idb 1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA.
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM FOR THE GENERAL PLAN FOR
THE CITY OF TEMECULA.
BACKGROUND
Over the past several months, the City Council has held seven public hearings on the Draft
City General Plan. To date, all the individual Elements have been reviewed by the Council.
At the October 26 meeting, it is anticipated that the City Council will review the balance of
the remaining clean-up items, the EIR, the Statement of overriding Considerations, the
Mitigation Monitoring Program, will Certify the EIR and approve the General Plan.
CLEAN-UP ITEMS AND REVISIONS ADDENDUM
The following section includes a number of minor aspects of the General Plan that require City
Council direction:
Growth Management/Public Facilities Element
School Facility Policies
At the September 21 meeti'ng, the Council heard extensive testimony regarding the School
Facilit!es language in the general plan. After an in-depth discussion, the Council directed staff
to meet with the School District and representatives from Kemper Community Development
one last time to work out language agreeable by all parties. A meeting was held at the school
district offices on Tuesday September 28. The City received revised language from both the
School District and Kemper. As a result, staff is recommending the following language:
GOAL 4
A quality school system that contains adequate facilities and funding to educate
the youth of Yemecula.
Discussion
Adequate school facilities and funding are necessary to ensure that the high
quality of education is extended to future residents of the City. Mitigating
impacts of development on the school system through the provision of school
sites, the imposition of statutory development fees and negotiated development
fees as permitted by law, as well as providing information to the School District
are the primary mechanisms to sustain quality educational services.
State Deadline for General Plan Adoption: November 25, 1993
R:%S%OENPI,,AI~OPCCIO 10/1~93 klb 2
Policy 4.1
Policy 4.2
Policy 4.3
Policy 4.4
Coordinate with the Temecula Valley Unified School District, when
considering General Plan a_.m. endments, specific plans, zone changes or
other legislative land use policy decisions, to support the School District
in providing adequate school facilities for students for new development
to the extent permitted by law.
Promote and encourage the phasing of project development so that the
School District may plan, finance, and construct facilities intended to
serve the development.
Review proposed legislative land use decisions in the context of the
adequacy of present and future facilities as permitted by law.
Provide safe access for school children walking, bicycling, or driving to
and from school sites through coordination between the School District
and City Departments of Planning, Public Works and Engineering.
Policy 4.5
Pursue the establishment of a trade school, junior college, or four-year
college in Temecula which offers an emphasis in education required by
the engineering, biotechnical and biomedical industries located in
Temecula.
Policy 4.6
Plan for the joint use of school/municipal facilities wherever feasible and
desirable, including the joint use of school grounds, buildings, City
parks, multipurpose buildings and recreational facilities.
Implementation Program
C. School Facilities
Request the School District to provide the City with information concerning
potential impacts associated with proposed residential development. The
information should include a status report of the available school facilities to
serve proposed projects. To the extent that adequate school facilities are not'
available on a timely basis, the City will seek to assist the District and
developers in arriving at a solution to provide adequate school facilities, as
permitted by law.
Coordinate with developers and the School District to ensure that school sites
are adequate. ly sized and located to meet increases in demand. Require
proposed projects with school sites to include a phasing plan that links project
development with the provision of a school facility when needed.
Since S.B. 1287 places substantial constraints on the City in this area, the City
will enter into a continuing dialogue among interested parties to create an
implementation program that is in compliance with state law and meets the
needs of the school District and the City's needs for adequate and affordable
housing and economic development. Should S.B. 1287 be repealed as a result
State Dewdline for General Plan Adoption: November 25, 1993
R:\S\GEN'PLAI~OPC'CIO 10118/93 Idb 3
of rejection of Proposition 170 on the state-wide ballot November 2, 1993, the
City Council shall establish a sch~oOI mitigation resolution which specifies the
procedures to be followed by the City, School District and developers in order
to determine school facilities impact associated with residential development,
available sources of funding for school facilities necessitated by such
development and the appropriate mitigation measures. The resolution would
provide for procedures consistent with those under County Resolution 93-131,
which apply to the County portion of the Temecula Valley Unified School
District, as permitted by law.
This language has been reviewed by the representatives from the School District and Kemper
Community Development who have verbally supported the revisions. Attached to this report
is a written opinion from the City Attorney supporting the language.
Land Use Bement
The land use designation along the east side of Ynez Road, south of Winchester Road,
(Walmart site) was originally designated Professional Office on the July 22, 1992 Draft Land
Use Plan. During its public hearing process (Fall of 1992), the Planning Commission made no
change to this designation. On February 22, 1993, staff received a letter from the property
owner's representative, requesting a change to the land designation to Community
Commercial. On June 15, 1993, the Council tentatively approved the applicant's request and
changed the draft land use designation to Community Commercial.
This area was designated professional office on the draft plan because the general plan
consultant envisioned it as an urban village center including finance and office uses with
supporting commercial and service uses. The applicant's request and Council's decision to
change the designation to community commercial was to make the designation consistent
with the pending Walmart application.
In order to remain consistent with recent Council action regarding the Walmart site, staff
recommends the land use designation be returned to Professional Office. ,Because this
designation was previously specified, there should be no additional impacts associated it.
Circulation Element
Nicolas Road Extension
At the last meeting the Council directed staff to determine the merits of keeping the Nicholas
Road extension on the Circulation Plan in a configuration that did not cross Santa Gertrudis
Creek. As demonstrated by the Traffic Model, the Nicholas Road extension provides little
benefit reducing congestion along Winchester Road, regardless of its alignment. However,
there is a benefit in providing additional access to the future high school site.
If this is the justification for keeping the alignment on the Circulation Plan, staff and the traffic
consultant recommend that the alignment crosses the creek. Staff estimates that from a cost-
benefit perspective, the road segment would be more effective crossing the creek, providing
additional access to the future high school site. The added cost of the bridge is partially
State Deadline for General Plan Adoption: November 25, 1993
R:~S\GEN'PLAN~0PCCI0 10/20193 ]rJb 4
offset by reduced land acquisition and road improvement costs because the link across the
creek would be shorter.
Rural Road Standards
During the public hearing for the Circulation Element, a number of residents living in semi-rural
large lot areas of the City requested that the Council consider a rural road standard. In
response, the Council added language to the Community Design Element approving non-urban
roads in the City's rural areas. The Public Works Department staff is proposing that additional
language be added to the General Plan to ensure that the appropriate public works road
standard is used in these circumstances. Staff is recommending the Optional Rural Arterial
Highway cross section found in Figure 3-2 and that the following description be added to the
Roadway Function Design Guidelines:
10. Optional Rural Arterial Highway Standard
This optiona~ interim roadway standard may be used in rural and semi-rural
areas with the following characteristics: (1) the adjacent parcels are used
primarily for residential purposes, (2) the lot sizes exceed 1/2 acre, (3) the
adjacent areas'are primarily designated as either Hillside, Very Low, or Low
Density Residential in the General Plan, and(4) have general plan right-of-ways
which' are less than 110 feet.
Features include:
A two lane cross section; however, in limited circumstances, left and
right turn lanes may be required at some intersections.
Bike lanes will be located along only one side of the roadway to form a
continuous system along each street, when needed.
Minimum intersection/access spacing along Rural Arterial Highways
should be approximately one-sixteenth of a mile (330 feet). Direct
access from private residential properties should be avoided where
possible.
· Retention of the full general 'plan right-of-way.
Should future traffic volumes on streets constructed to a Rural Arterial
Highway Standard reach Level-of-Service D, then the roadway should
be imgroved to full general plan standards."
Landscape Median Islands
To maintain consistency with the Community Design Element (Goal 4, Policies 4.2 and 4.4),
staff is recommending that medians within the City's major streets (110' or greater right-of-
way) be installed with landscaping. The cross-sections shown in figure 3-2, and
accompanying descriptions on pages 3-18 through 3-21 have been made to reflect this
modification.
State Deadline for General Plan Adoption: November 26, 1993
R:~S~GEI~PLAN~OPCCIO 10/1~/~5 klb 5
Under normal circumstances, the landscaped median would be part of the off-site
improvements installed or paid for by the developer consistent with current City procedures.
For those streets already constructed the installation of medians landscaping would be the
responsibility of the City during some future capitol improvements project. The Temecula
Community Services District would maintain the landscaping in medians.
West Side Parkway
The Westside Parkway (Western Bypass Corridor) has been revised to an 88' right-of-way.
This right of way will be adequate to accommodate the proposed roadway.
Community Design Bement
Chaparral Opportunity Area
At its June 15, 1993 meeting, the City Council tentatively approved keeping the Chaparral
area as a special study area. However, the Council directed staff to continue to work at
developing criteria for the Chaparral Area in order to accommodate land planning for the
Chaparral area prior to the adoption of the General Plan.
Staff has further studied the Chaparral Area and is recommending the following changes:
Remove the area south of Santiago Road from the Chaparral Area.
Remove the Chaparral Area from the Special Study Overlay.
Designate the Chaparral Area as Low Density.
Assign the L-1 Zoning District which will set a minimum lot size of I acre.
Include a section in the Community Design Element establishing criteria for
development for the Chaparral Area at densities up to 2 units per acre in certain
circumstances.
Staff believes the proposed changes to the Chaparral Area will address the various concerns
previously raised by the Council. The Low Density land use designation will allow for greater
use of the property; however, the criteria found in the Community Design Element (found in
the Revision Addendum) will provide for appropriate transition and protection of natural
resources. To assure a better transition from adjacent areas, lots adjacent to Santiago Road'
shall have a minimum lot size of 1.75 acres. A property owner would be able to develop half
acre lots upon showing justification through a zone change without having to apply for a
general plan amendment.
Revisions Addendum
Throughout the Public Hearing process, the City Council has been taking straw votes on the
individual elements. Along the way, Council has directed staff to make various corrections
to the text and exhibits within the Plan. Staff has made the requested modifications and
included them in a Revisions Addendum attached to this report. The addendum consists of
all recommended changes to the General Plan Elements provided during the Public hearings
before the City Council. Only those pages of the Draft General Plan, where modifications are
recommended, are included in the Revisions Addendum.
State Deadline for General Plan Adoption: November 25, 1993
R:~,S~GEHPLAI~GPCCI0 10118/93 klb 6
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Background
An environmental impact report is a document which is intended to describe and analyze
potentially significant environmental effects and discuss ways to mitigate or avoid these
effects· The legal requirements for the preparation and adoption of an environmental impact
report are contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as amended, and
further explained in the CEQA Guidelines prepared by the Governor's Office of Planning
Research·
Contents of an Environmental Impact Report
The purpose of an environmental impact report (EIR) is to provide information to decision
makers, responsible and affected agencies, and the public about what is likely to occur as a
result of the proposed project· To facilitate this goal, the California Environmental Quality Act
and Guidelines require that an environmental impact report provide the following information:
2.
3.
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
A description of the project;
A description of the project's physical and environmental setting;
The significant environmental effects of the project;
The project's unavoidable significant environmental effects;
The mitigation measures or actions needed to reduce the effect of the project on the
environment;
The alternatives to the proposed project;
The relationship between short-term uses and long-term productivity;
The significant irreversible effects and changes which would result from the project;
The project's growth inducing impacts;
The environmental effects which were found to not be significant;
The project's significant cumulative effects and,
The comment letters received on the draft EIR;
The responses to the comments received on the draft EIR; and,
A list of persons, ordanizations, and agencies consulted with or commenting upon the
draft EIR.
Process for Preparing and Certifying EIR's
In additions to the contents of an environmental impact report, State Law also contains
standards for the preparation, notification, review and comment, and certification (adoption)
processes. The standardized process for the certification of an EIR is as follows:
Notice of Preparation (of an EIR) to solicit public and agency issues and concerns and
determine the scope of the EIR;
Preparation of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR);
Notice of Completion (of an EIR) and the distribution of the DEIR for public review and
comment;
The response comments received on the DEIR;
Preparation of the Final EIR (FEIR);
Certification that the EIR was prepared in accordance with the provisions of CEQA;
State Deadline for General Plan Adoption: November 26, 1993
R:\S\GE~PLANXGPCCI0 1011~93 Idb 7
Adoption of a State;nent of Overriding Considerations; and,
Notice of Determination (that a decision has made using the FEIR)..
Initial Environmental Study
The Initial Environmental Study (IES) was completed for the Draft General Plan and a Notice
of Preparation (NOP) was issued on April 15, 1992. The IES identified a number of potential
impacts associated with the following issue and resource areas:
· Geology and seismicity ·
· Air Quality ·
· Hydrology ·
· Biological resources ·
· Noise ·
· Land Use ·
· Agricultural resources ·
· Safety and the risk of upset ·
Population, housing and employment
Transportation and circulation
Public services and utilities
Aesthetics
Light and glare
Cultural resources
Parks, recreation and trails
Fiscal impacts
The City received a number of responses to the NOP from a number of federal, state, and
regional organizations and individuals on the scope and content of the proposed environmental
impact report and these comments and concerns were considered in the preparation of the
Draft EIR. The Initial Environmental Study is included in the Draft EIR Technical Appendices.
The Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) was completed in August, 1992. The DEIR
was sent to responsible andstrustee agencies and previously identified interested parties. The
official public comment period for the DEIR was from August 14, 1992 to October 2, 1992.
During the comment period, the City received 13 comment letters from 12 different agencies
or organizations. In addition, a letter was received after the comment period ended. This
letter was also considered in the preparation of the FEIR. The majority of the comments were
focused on the continued identification and preservation of biological resources. Air quality,
circulation, aesthetics, and agriculture were also discussed in the comment letters.
Significant Environmental Effects
The fo!lowing table lists the identified environmental issues and the level of significance of the.
impacts after mitigation.
:ENVIRONMENTAL i:IMPA:CTS.:
Geology and Seismic Hazards
Air Quality
Hydrology
Biology
Noise
Land Use/General Plan/Zoning
:LEVEL:. ;:OF- :SIG:NIFICAN:CEi:A ~ER MITIGATION
Mitigated to a level of insignificance
Significant
No significant impacts
Significant
Significant
Mitigated to a level of insignificance
State Deadline for General Ran AdoptiOn: November 25, 1993
R:\S\Ot~IPLAN~OPCCIO 10~18~ klb 8
.ENVIRONMENTAL::IMPACTS:
Agricultural
Risk of Upset
Population/Housing/Employment
Transportation/Circulation
Fire Service
Police Service
Hospital Service
Paramedic Service
Education
Library
Water
Sewer
Solid Waste
Electricity
Natural Gas
Aesthetics
Light and Glare
Cultural Resources
Parks/Recreation/Open Space
Fiscal Impacts
Statement of Overridina Considerations
~:' :LEVEL OF SIGNIRCANCE .;A:FTER '~'M ITIGATI ON
Significant
Mitigated to a level of insignificance
No significant impacts
Significant
Mitigated to a level of insignificance
Mitigated to a level of insignificance
No significant impacts
No significant impacts ·
Significant
Significant
Mitigated to a
Mitigated to a
Mitigated to a
No significant
No significant
Mitigated to a
Mitigated to a level of
Mitigated to a level of
Mitigated to a level of
No significant impacts
level of insignificance
level of insignificance
level of insignificance
impacts
impacts
level of insignificance
insignificance
insignificance
insignificance'
The Environmental Impact Report lists 26 environmental impacts, seven of which cannot be
mitigated to a level of insignificance. These are: air quality, biology, noise, agricultural,
transportation/circulation, education, and library services. As a result, the City will need to
adopt a statement of overriding considerations.
State Law requires the City to balance the benefits of the General Plan against those
environmental impacts that cannot be mitigated to a level of insignificance. In order to make
a statement of overriding considerations the City must make written findings to support its
action. Attached for the Commission's consideration is a Statement of Facts and Findings and
Statement of Overriding Considerations. This attachment documents the impacts, considers
alternatives to the General Plan and makes findings supporting the Statement of Overriding
Considerations.
State Deadline for General Plan Adoption: November 25, 1993
R:\S~0EIqPLAN~.OPCCI0 10118193/r,.tb 9
Miticiation Monitoring Program
State law also requires the City to adopt a mitigation monitoring program to ensure
implementation of all mitigation measures included in the EIR. The Program describes the
roles, responsibilities and procedures in implementing the mitigation measures. The program
includes a matrix which highlights the mitigation measures, the key City department
responsible for overseeing that function, and the timing of each mitigation. A Mitigation
Monitoring Program has also been attached for the Council's consideration.
Planning Commission Hearings
During the January 4 and 24, 1993 Public Hearings, the Commission received limited
testimony on the EIR, Statement of Overriding Considerations and mitigation Monitoring
Program. The Commission made a few minor modifications to these documents. As a result
of the discussion on the School Facility Policies, The Planning Commission listed the Education
Environmental Impact as a Significant Unavoidable Impact within the Statement of Overriding
Considerations.
CONCLUSION
The General Plan Consultants and Planning Department believe the Draft Element has been
adequately revised to respond to comments received by individuals, groups, and other
agencies and recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No(s) 93- , Certifying the
Final Environmental Impact Report, adopting the Mitigation Monitoring Program, adopting the
City of Temecula's first General Plan and adopting the Implementation Program as contained
in Attachment No(s) 4, 5, 6, and 7.
Attachments:
4.
5.
6.
Revisions Addendum - Page 11
Attorney Opinions and Related Correspondence Regarding School Facility Policies and
AB 1287 - Page 12
Resolution Certifying the EIR - Page 13
Resolution Adopting Mitigation Measure Program - Page 18
Resolution Adopting General Plan - Page 22
Resolution Adopting General Plan Implementation Program - Page 26
State Deadline for General Ran Adoption: November 25, 1993
R:\S\GEHi~LAN~GPCCI0 10/18193 ]rJb 10
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
REVISIONS ADDENDUM
R:\S\OF_NPLAN~OPCCI0 10/18/~3 klb 11
CITY OF TE~IiECULA --- REVISIONS ADDENDL%I
INTRODUCTION
The Revisions Addemdum consiam of the mcomme-ded changca to the elements of the Draft
'General Plan daxcd February 16, 1993. The pages included in the Revisions Addendure am only
~hos~ pages of the Draft GenemI Plan where additions or de~ions to language or mapping are
recommended. The additions am shown in ~ ~ and d~h-.tions are show with a ate/o: our~
The recommended changca am the rcault of input m~ived during the Public He~mgs, staff
review, and from wzimm comments by State Department of Housing and Community
Development.
CITY OF TDdECULA L~d Use
II1. GOALS AND PCLICIES
Goal 1
A complete and inL-,grated mix of ruidential,
r~crutional, ;---~- public and open ..space had uses.
COrnmel'd~
Discu, ssion A w=ll-balanccd community provides a broad rage of land uses that ax~ plann~cl
in dcsirabt= paucrns and intensities. By providing for a balanced mixpare of land
uses, the City can achicvc a suitable inventory of housing for a rang= of income
groups, a visblc commer. Aal and cmploymcnt base for rcsidcnts and surrounding
commtmitics, ample open space and recz~tional oppornmities, and adcquatc
public facilities and services.
Policy 1,1 Rcvicw all 'proposcd dcvelopmcnt plans for consistency with the
COmm,mity goalS, policies and implcmcnmtion programs of this C-cncral
Plan.
Policy
Polic~ 1.3
Policy 1.4
Poncy LS
Promote the usc of innovative site plm-ni-,v techniques ~t ~n~buz
~ ~c d~l~nt d a ~ of ~idn~ ~m s~l~ ud
d~i~ hcl~g houhg ~mblc m ~c ~mmnni~'S lab~ ~.
Rcquir~ the dcvclopmcnt of unified or clus~'cd communit~-lcvcl and
neighborhood-level c~mmcrcial ccmcm and discourage developmorn of
· strip communal uses.
Co~sidcr ~hc impws on surrounding land uses and infmsu~cmrc when
r~vi~,,ing proposals for ncw dcvelopmcnL
Support thc development of light industrial, manufaauring, research and
development, and office uses to diversify Temecula's economic base.
Policy L6
Policy 1.7
Policy
Provide well dcfinexi ZOning and dcvctopmcnt standards and procedures to
guide privatc scclor planning and development.
Require the pv3paration of spwific plans as designated on the Land Ur.o
~ Spzdfic/'/an Over/ay to achieve thc comprehensive pl,--i-g and
phasing of development and hffxa.ramcnn~
Consider t=iri.g thc lead on prcp~g specific plans for areas designatcd
on thc I2nd Usc Plan that havc muttiplc landownem-
Poncy
PER CC
DIRECTION
Encourage pln-=od unit dovelopmonm ~e__,'_'ble zoning techa/qu6 in
appropriate locations to prcscrvc natural f=aturcs, achicvc innovative sitc
design, achieve a range of treason of ~.g provide open space and
recreation facilities, and to provide necessary arechilies and facilitic~
TEM4X~Oa3S'-LmXt~R · Drs~ Dsuc July 26, 1993
Ps~c 2-9
PER CC
DIRECTION
The City of
_~B~CULA
General Plan Program
FIGURE
'F..
; 'k
The City of ! i[
.fZM:ECULA ,,mllB~,,~
General Plan Program !~ ~ ~ ~
~G~ 2-5
CITY F ~CTTI,~ Land Us~ Element
for 5pecffic Plan Overlay
2-5 (Continued)
.~PROVED SPECIFIC PLAN ARE.~5
W'mchesw. r Mesa
Rancho Spa and Counu7 Club
Warm Springs
A.
B.
C.
D. Si/vcrhawk
E. Mountain View
F. Margarim V'~lag:
G. Rancho Highlands
H. Paloma de/Sol
I. Vail Ranch
J. Rexlhawk
3.1. Roripaugh Hills
FUTURE SPECII~C PLAN AREAS~
K. W'mchcster 1800
L. Quinta Do Lago
M. Murricta Springs #1
N. Bor~l Airpark
O. Crown Valley Village
P. Hot Springs V'ffiagc
John-~on Ranch
R. Roripaugh 800
S. W'mch~ster Hills
T. W'mchest~r Meadows Business Park
U. T~mecula Regional C~nter
V. Campos Ve~des
W. Old Town
X. Unnamed Specific Plan
Y. Unnamed Specific Plan
Z~z,7-~- Unnamed Specific Plan
AA, Murdy Ranch
LOCATION
Ax'~a Of Inte,-'~t
Area of Interest
Area of Interat
Spher~ of I,~uenc~
Sph~ d ~u~n~
.CiW of Tm~a
CiW of Tm~a
CiW d T~a
Sph~ of
Sph~ of
C~ of T~~
LO~ON
Sphe~ of
Sph~ d
Sp~ d Tnfi~
Spb~ of lne~n~
Spb~ ~
~ of
Sphe~ of In~uen~
CiW of T~~
CiW d T~a
C~W d T~a
CiW d T~a
C[W d T~a
CiW of T~
CiW ~ T~a
CiW d T~a
CiW d T~~
CiW d T~a
x Tl~nam6oftlu~Futur~Slmd. fwPlm~Am=m'~.mbjwtl~r,k~m~
7m~x~fiP-u~.us~ · Dm~ Da~: July
Pa~ 2,38
10/04/8~ 1~:44 ~714 8~18~48 T~E PL~.\~ISG CTR ~UUZ
!'
I1
ii
!
CITY C TE~fECULA La.H b~ El~m.nt
PER CC
DIRECTION
Spec;.aZ Study Overlay
The Special Study Overlay designation is intended for those areas in the community
that require a comprehensive, detailed evaluation of development opporruniaes and
con.suuints. The CRy of Ternecula will lead the preparation of a special study for
the N~colas Valley area as shown on Figure 2-6. The land use designations
identified on the Land Use Plan are based on exi.~g lot patterns, access
conaraints, lack of infntm~tcrure, topography, and other considerations. The
purpose of the special study is to recommend any changes to General Plan land uses
based on a dgaiIed evaluation of the following:
the proven of J~d control, sewer, water and other services;
impacts on surrounding development in errIns of tra. O~c, light, noise, and
other impacts;'
rothods to provide a ~n btgween rural and suburban/urban
topography and related visual impacts of development;
ta~=ing lot pagems;,
tra. O~c circulaaon and impacts on level of service;
vegetation and wildlife resource.r, and
the provision of recreation trails and open space tinkage~
The special study(s) should also identify a strategy for financing and phasing of
infzu.Ttructure and other public improvements. Future development must be
cons~tent with the adopted reconunendatlons of the special ~tdy. Sho.ld
development be proposed prior to compleaon of the study, the land use should be
conziaent with the ex~ang General Plan designation.
If the ,Special Study inchtde~ recommendations that usceuitate an amaadrnent to the
General Plan, the cog of the amendment shall be borne by the CRy of Temecula.
July 2~, 1993
Page 2-I2
~,ZMECUI-,A :', ~~
General Plan Program ~ ~
FIGUI~ l-~
CITY 2F ~CUT_.A Circulation Element
---111. .OALS AND POLICIES
Goal 1
Strive m maintain a Level of Service "D" or better at all intersections within
the City during peak hours and Level of Servic~ "C" or beret during non-
peak hours.
Discussion Th= l=vel of service ~:nc~t is de~n~ as a qualitativ= measure describing
operating ~nditions at an intme.~ion or along a madway s~gagnt. A level. of
service definition genmlly describes opmting conditions in mrms of famza such
as spe~d, freedom to manmrvcr, traffic intcrnxptions, delay, comfort and
couveui~uce, and saf~y. L-~I of Service 'D" is typically considered tolerable
i~ limited ~ the pe~k. hour periods wheu trmt:Fic flows ax~ huaviesL
The stated level of service g~al serves as the foundation for providing a s~r,t
network that moves p~ple and goods safely and efficiently throughout the City
while ensuring that tr~c delays m l~-pt to a mum.
Policy 1.1
Establish strut standards and all new madway facilities shall be
consmxaed or upgrade~i to m~t City standards where fusible.
Policy 12
Require an adequuto evaluation of potential tr~f'~c impam associated with
new development prior to project approval, and re, quix~ adequam mitigation
measur~ prior to, or concun'~nt with, project d~telopment.
Policy
p!~t CC
DIRECTION
Use the Circulation Elment Roadway Plan to guide dei~ilvt p|..r,i.g and
implementation of the City's roadway system, T/~s .'¢or:.h G6..an-i
Kat~ ..oy Rm~F l~vro:-.s/o::. linld..g .V~colar-Rsed to thot. stlib..ad.~It-'g~'itt
RmqF waI not be i...pk...a. dad irm'a tho followi::g ;..ajar ~.'.~0-r Pee'~s
a..d i...ptov~..2et. re hsv~ be~,. so...platodt
B.'tsr~sld Stage Roc~ a,aa.-sio='4~'o... Highway ,'9 Safrk to
M--'.. :are Hat IF-.'..gs Rasdt
O~t'=.d D,~o Ov~rt~ss~
Ma. oari~ Rs4 f~o... Salane to Mzrristr Hat ,Ypri..gs Ra,dl
W~..o/ssttat P.~o4 (Ilighw.-y 79 Nsr. is) w~..i..g,to s~-- la..ta al o..,
:E..: Rasff to ,tvlr' Rse4l
Niael~s-Roe~ asetotl.v po... Wi..oh~ar P. sat to ]rtarfiolt
31,.~.'st, Has Springs Rand ~sr po... Ws..dse~ror Roed to
BurtarfiMF 8t-,ge Rsad~- a..d
C'~a Cin~ol W C~iI~ C'7s.'W~ W W-lsott Lcr. o (bo~v~o., I~
Sm, or-:- ~-~t Niaolas),
'rIM-OtXiRiP. tatC:tI. · July 2.6, 1.99'3 paF 3,9
CITY OF TEtMECUI..A Cir:alation Element
la=_R CC
DIRECTION
In ~dd;'~on, C~..'y ~s..~t shaH ..-udy ;hc L~:signarion of ;.qghway 79 Nsr:.h
frsm a S:atc .'~'ig;~.~y :s a C-"~.'- Urban .~.rrc~l, and :;~ radir:c.-2on
..ra~t~s Z.~oratod ~o,.. o'_'t~ao ;hg C"7 :o ~ :ol; r~lrr~· The ~an:raI
Cir-s"l"ion ?kn sksll ~o po~odiaally raraiod ~-* 5, 2~, :5, and 20
buildout ?o. 2~ds to ov=Itt~t~ ;kc hood for. ,'ha .Vorth C.~ncrt~ Xoamcy
i~ad a.rtonsrio~. ~t :he .Von'h Gor. ossl .~amay Rss'~ ~A-tonz~on .:s
nr. sin ~n tha Ch. gulstion ?lan, spoM~o ;n'~.'as ,. .uF.. bo '_'r..4orrakon and
ps~blioalIy notiead ~r. 2st, to $h0 i...1;l~...s.~tn-~or. sf :ha road}ray, inshtd.:ng
_'r. Xnvi?o::.;.~ntnl Imps:st Rapon :!~ gs in complianao w~k :ha :hon
eetaptsc~ C~QA gv_"k.li.~ss fo~ noiso b,ffa.-'.t:g :xJ S,blio
Policy 1.4
Policy 1.5
Pursue trip r~duction and wansportation systems management measures to
rr~iuc= and limit congestion at intersections and along streets within the
City.
Psriodically Updat~ ~v~ty threz years, or as n~e. dsd. "build-our' traffic
fox-~asm m monitor the impact of development approvals and the
adequacy of th~ C~tion Element Rindway Plan.
Goal 2 Enhane~ u-a~ic safety on City su~eu.
Discussion The safe operation of vehicular u~c on City su~s is a concert of both City
of:~ials and r~iden= of th= comanuniW. Th= f~llowing policies am dimcmd
towards minimizing saf=ty hazards and encouraging safer operating conditions on
City
Policy 2.1 The City shall emY. or~ speed r~strictions throughout thc City.'
Policy 2.2
P.e. quir= that faxmr= roads and improvements to eajsting wads be designed
to mi-lmiz= traffic conedc.~s such as those wh~ r~sult fx~m curb p.rt-~ng
mancuvcts and uuc, onu'ulled access along heavily Waveled roadways.
Policy
Requixe that tiz d~velopment of new private driveways do not introduc2
si~qScn-t traffic conflicts along major supers and primary residential
Policy 7.4
R~quix= that vehicular and pedestrian traffic be sepan~ to th= maxim,,m
~r~nt f=asible.
Policy 2.$
Establish an ongoing malnteman~ program to ensur~
CRy's madway syszm.
1.Rd-on~sGl~4~v,c~at. · July 26, 199'3 Pa~ ~.10
CITY C ."' TEx'N/fECULA Circ:fiarion Element
CIRCULATION PLAN
Tac Circulation Plan developed for the City of Temecula has been d~i~ncd to m~: the
following objc~ives:
· To provide adequate capaciW to accommodate the travel needs resulting from the
General Plan Land Use Element as well as from anticioated development in adjacent
Rivemide County and City of Murrieta areas; and
· To maintain a positive quality of LLf~ in Temecula.
PER CC
OIRECTION
The pmpos~ Cimulation Plan for ~e City of Tem~'ula Sphere of kfiuek~e and .~rea of
Intorose and Sphere/.4rta of In~ce, and Em, h,'om'ne~t~ Study Area, is illustrated in
Figure 3-1. The alignments shown for fraure planned roadways are prelirnirtaty and are
subject to refinement based on future engineering smd/,es. Fi=~.xro
raceremanded ~ix'~larion system for aro~ ourride :he C:W and Sphere and illus..'mtes the
continuity and internorion of ~ao 'Zky's Ciroulation Plan vrith :he surmundin; circulation
system. F~ures ~g t]~ plmmed corghn~y srld ix=oration of the C~ty's
Ch, culaaon Plm~ w~th the surrounding drc-ulaaon syssem ar~ included in t~e Geeend
PIan EIR Append~ Volume iII.
Principal Plan Features
While all components of the Circulation Plan arc important, some of the Plan f~tures
are being hi~li~jnted in this section, These featur~ have been selected based on one
or more faaors:
· The facility serves as a primary raf:~c carrying arterial within the City;
The facility represents a siff, if~c--t change fxom the tn'vdous SWAP Circulation
Element; and/or
· · The facility/corridor includes special desiSn feanh-es or s~rves a special function.
The principal features of the Circulation Plan include:
DesL~-mtion of W'mchester Road, east of Jefferson Avenue, as an "~
restricw. d" Urban Az'.erial with special added eascmcms reserved for future
or ravel demand management use.
DesiSnation of Star= Route 79 (south), east of 1-15, as an "~ restrio=d"
Urban Arterial to Buff=field Stage Road and an "access resnicr=i" Ar=fial east
of Butterfield Stage RoacL
Designalien of Bur-.efficld Stage Road as an "~ reswic2d" Arr=ial nor, h of
Staxe Route 79 (south) except for the se.%,rnent between Nicolas Road and Bezel
Road which would be an "access resm'c=d" Urban ArtermL
T~-OZ,~m-~m~X, * July 2.6, 199'3 . Pa~c ~L~
TYPICAL ROADWAY CROSS SErfIONS
14°T12'T12'T14' ·
( 22/ ) "T"' 14' ·
URBIN ARTERIAL HIG}.NVAY
Ca-LANe
tIReAN ARTL=Rtal HF'qHWAY
(e-LANE)
.~ 1T · 1T ·
-'*T""-'T""T"' "-i-"'T'*:-'T"'
I
I
}'& ~ H~HWAY
· 7eROW *
I ~ ·
79*.. 101' ROW
""""' }i:,t]"t"' '
· 5' 14' 14' "
·
OPTtONAL RURAL Ar~i~:H.AL
* Sidewe/k
~ Te, be ueed forcum pmt~eg, bikelame e'diemeem lene
**.k Forintedmminsemi-n. NedlepiXeeeewNdn
theCayinme~'.semmdeq,.eedeelemm'ltgN-d. ee/e-
General Plan Program
RGURB 3-2
CIT' OF ~CULA Circulation Element
V. IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS ---
This section of the Circulation Element discusses a broad range of topics related to
transportation improvement implementation strategies and program-,: which collectively work
towards the realization of the Circulation Element goals and objectives.
A. Roadway Functional Design Guidelines
The following functional design guidelines
classifications depicted on the Circulation Plan.
sections for the Circulation Plan roadways.
are recommended for roadway
Figure 3-2 shows the typical cross-
Interstate 15 freeway design standards are dictated by Calm District 8. The
ultimate facility planned by Caltrans (as defined in the Route Concept Report for
Interstate 15)-through the City of Temecula will add one High Occupancy
Vehicle (HOV) lane to the current four mixed flow lanes in each direction.
Interchange improvements identified in the Circulation Plan will need to be
coordinated and approved by Caltrans. It is likely that all interchanges on-ramps
along Interstate 15 within Temecula will be subject to peak period ramp metering
within the next ten years. The City should support the concurrent implementation
of HOV bypass lanes at the ramps (where possible) to promote ride sharing and
express transit usage by area commuters.
2. Urban Arterial Highway
Features include:
A six to eight-lane high speed highway with raised landscaped median (use
for left turn movements) and striped shoulders.
Access restriction may vary depending on whcre the' facility is located
within the City and the dcgrec to which the roadway serves through traffic.
Generally, one-quarter mile intersection spacing should bc considered as a
minimum although one-third mile would bca dcsirablc target. Where
ovcrriding circumstances will not allow the desired intersection spacing
policy to bc met, lcfi turn restrictions should bc considcrcd at all
unsignalized intersections and "high-spetxl" design fcatures should bc
incorporated into the intersection design (e.g. curb radii and
ac~leration/deceleration lanes where appropriate.
Urban Anerials designated as "access resxricted" on the Circulation Plans
should maintain a minimum one-third mile spacing and a desirable target
spacing of one-half mile. Raised media should be used on "access
restricted" Urban Ax'l:eriais.
TI~M-OXXO~P-OP,.Ctn. · September 14, 1993
Page 3-18
CITY OF TEMEC~ Circulation Eiernent
Curbside parking is generailL.not considered appropriate along a heavily
traveled facility of this type.
Riverside County design standards should be used as a basis for developing
City standards. State Route 79 is subject to Caltrans District 8 design
standards and policies. A segment of Ynez Road is classified as an Urban
Arterial primarily due to its' planncd six-lane section. Right-of-way
constraints and existing development will not allow for the typical cross
section to be provided or desired access controls to be achieved.
Additional right-of-way/easement dedications should bc considercd at all key
intersections with other Urban Artcrials, Arterials, and Major streets for the
accommodation of fulI width auxiliary turn lanes.
Traffic carrying capacities of 53,000 to 70,000+ vchicles per day (at Levcl
of Service D) can bc achieved dcpcnding on the degree of access control
and peak period traffic loadinS.
3. ~*t~ri~ Highway
Features include:
A four-lane cross section with raised or paintod landscaped median (used
for left-turn movements).
Desirable minimum spacing for major strcet intersections along an arterial ·
is approximately one quarter mile. Minor street and driveway access may
be allowed at shorter intervals but consideration should be given to left turn
restrictions at these locations.
Anerials designated as "access restricted" on the Circulation Plan should
maintain a minimum one-quarter mile spacing and a desirable target spacing
of one-third mile. Raised medians should be used an "access restricted"
artcrialso
As a primary truffle carrier, curbside parking may not be considered
appropriate along the more heavily travcled Arterial scgmcnts within the
City.
Additional right-of-way/casement dedications should be considered at key
intcrscctions with Urban Artcrials, other Arttrials, and Major strects for thc
accommodation of full-width auxiliary turn lanes.
Tmf-fic carrying capacities of 34,000 to 45,000+ vehicles per day (at Level
of Scrvicc D) can bc achieved depending on the degree of access control
and pcak pcriod loadings.
TEN,t-OX~P-Cm. CU~ · September 14, 1993
pagc~-20
CIT 3F TEMECULA Circulation Element
Riverside County design standards should be used as a basis for developing City
standards for Arterial roadways. "~ segment of State Route 79 (south) east of
Butterfield Stage Road would be subject to Caltrans design standards and
policies.
4. Major Highway
Features include:
A four-lane cross section with painted or raised ~rdscaped median (used
for left-turn movements).
Minimum spacing for principal street intersections along Major streets
should be one-eighth mile. The desirable target spacing would be one-
quarter mile between principal intersection. Where overriding circumstances
will not allow the minimum spacing policy to be maintained, left turn
restrictions should be considered at minor unsignalized driveways.
As a primary traffic carrier, curbside parking may not be appropriate along
some of the mor~ heavily traveled Major street segments within the City.
Additional right-of-way/easement dedications should be considered at key
intersections with Urban Arterials, Arterials, and other Major streets to allow
for full-width auxiliary turn lanes or dual-left turn lanes.
Traffic carrying capacities of 34,000 to 36,000 .vehicles per day (at Level of
Service D) can be achieved depending on the degree of access control and
peak period loadings.
Riverside County design standards should be used as a basis for developing City
standards for Major roadways.
Secondary Highway
Features include:
· A four-lane cross section without median (undivided).
Minimum intersection spacing along Secondary streets should be
approximately one-sixteenth mile (330 feet). Direct access from private
residential properties should be avoided where possible.
While the Secondary street cross section allows for curbside parking, this
parking must be prohibited near principal intersections where left-turn lane
striping is provided.
TE~-01~P-ClR.CUL · September 14, 1993
Page3-21
Urban AMPMgl
S-LAnes
""' mm 6 - lanes
4-ldln~S
~ Major
4 - Lanes
CIRCULATION PLAN
pnncipal Collector -
2-1,ancs
Size Vanes
Acccasli. estrictcd
'(""""'~':/~.,~ .?~.~,'?""""'
· ~. ~ ~1
:...
i
_i
f /.~
The City of
T~~CULA
General Plan Program
i
i &-~---,g
PTGUP~ 3-1
CHAPARRAL AREA
General Plan Program
CITY 'JF TEMECULA Housing Element
V. 30NSTPAINTS
A. Governmental Constraints
Govcr. mcntal constraints axe policies, standard.s or requirements impos~ by the
various levels of government on dcvclopmcnt. Although fcdcral and state agcncics
play a rolc in thc imposition of governmental constraints, these agencies arc beyond
thc infiucncc of local government and arc tht,-rcforc not addr~_~s~d in this docnm~nL.
The following factors constrain the nnintcnauc~, improvement, and/or dc',,~1opmcn~ of
housing in Tcmccula: land use controls; bufldin~ codes; pmc_-ssing proccdurcs; and
dcvclopm~tt fecs.
The C-choral Plan is the foundation of all land use controls in a jur~iction. The
Land Use EIcmcot identifies the location, distribution and intensity of 1and use~
in the Civ/. The primar7 insw~cnts for implementing th~ General Plan will be
the Zoning C~de and Subdivision Ordinance. T/re current Zon/~q Code heinl
used by ti~ C~ is ttur Counsy of Rivers~'s Ordinance 348. The C~ is
currvaly preparing a Devdopment Code which will be consistent with its
General Plan. For purposes of the Housing Eletnen~ an analysis of the Dra. fi
Tern~cula D~vdopm~t Code is Fovided. This analysis may be furth~r re. Fmed
during the he.= Housing Elftent update, when the Devdotmu~ Code will be
adopteeL The current Subdivision Ordinance being used by the City ~s the
County of Riversidez S~n Ordhumce 460. The C~ty erpects to continus
to rely on the Couray's Code for at ~ the ne~ .fiscal year..
The proposal Temecula Development Code incorporates r6Mentid standards
that will enable the conanue~ devdopme~t of higher dasay projects as
co~ under th~ County's Zoning Code and Subdivision Ordinanc~ The
proposed Development Code contains s~ven residential alassigns, which
cover the six General Plan Land Use de~i~n~ TI~ land use controls
p~rmit by right singl~ family r6idznces in all zones ~=cept the Medium and
H~gh Density categories. Townhomes, mulaf~y housing, and triobite leorues'
art perenitted by right in the Low Mdinm, Medimn, and High Den.vity zones.
In addition,* th~ Code provides for a V'dlage Center Overlay and a Planned
Devdopmtat Overlay. The Devdopment Code regulates ~ leatar6 as
buading height and density, lot area, sabacks, and open space mtuirvn .ents per
zoning di.slria. ~ awrlay zov~s art a special de. signaaon which ar~ subject
Approval for devdopment in the V'dlage C~Ittlr Overlay reqtlir6 ~tti~f~tt
of p~formance standards aractdatsd in the Devdopmtnt Code. These
aandards refl~a a focus on unique and matire devdopment that promotes
intern of raai~ open space and resihnad uses. D~vm~ty of housing,
~ affordable houdag is one factor in the performance ~aadard~ TI~
Plonnd Devdotmuat Overlay also. Fovid6 ~tnTaTity in development
CITY OF
standards. Development standards for the seven res~dent;zaI zoning
dasyificaZions are provided in Table. 4-29.
' .. Table 4-29
~" Draft Residential Develo.vrnent Standards
~'~n~Rt.ridtntialD~wlapm~ntStm~lards l ItR t V7., I L-I I L-Z l
Minima n AveraE~ Na Lot Arm ~er
~lni
2. Senior ~ HomL, tg oe Congngsm Can Fatilia:
M Dizrric~ and 12 DUIAC ia the LM Diztr~
Variable ,~abactcr: In arar m aiZow for a more intgreuing vimat image and more fiaible zite plmming varazble
twemy fe~ Garagex with emrat~w nat fadag ti~.fiwg ya~ at~ mag' b~ :eamu* a nd'nimum °f lO.ft' Othtr tmrt~au
of a armmare nmy lum~ a jrmm yard :edur2 ojr a miabaum af tm feet~ however. th~ mge .gsbagic q' tweaty fcgt
VatiabU Sid~ Fed Sah~= Var~bk ~Ut yard __--~_ ----'~ ~V be lnr,,~"-~ ~ t~ mm af the _~ yard
am lot line arrtmgemmt with a ttro .mtbadg oa tme aide yard attl.ft;ftem.fmt an tha oRm.rite.f, de ya~
The devda~mm~ amndard= ar~ bas~ on the Dn~ D~ ~k~..-,~ Cade dated M-.~ I9~ ~ ~
Development standards may add to the cost of housing because the sumdards
may necerrltcrtt additional conslruction and building materials and labor.
These gandards art enacted for the protection of the community's health,
safety and w elfa~
Modi. flca~n or .fl.,'t3fifty in development gandm'~ can reduce the cost of
homing con.gnzcaon, which may in turn, result in lowe' homing prices. In
Temecula's propostd Devdopmsnt Code, variable zetb. ck standards are
allowed; which Fogid~ more ~rdtn7Ry ~ dtt planning, p~Y on
irregularly shaped Igarcel~ In addition, ruidaaal development in both the
Planned Development and V'tllage Center Overlay Zones can take advantage o.f
eva grgaur flc~bilay in development standards for these arta~ It is expeaed
that development under these standards :'n :hcsc aPsas waI promote a wider
range of hous~g opportunities in co~_parison to the n'Mitional zoning di,rtric~.
The identification of affordable housing as a factor in the performance
standards for the VZllage.. Center Overlay provides a mechani~n for the
realization of this objective.
ParIcing requirement, v ~n the Draft Development Code call for two covered
space~ per xingle family residence with three or fewer bedrooms, and three
covered spaces for a single family residence with foar or more bedrooms.
ParIcing requirements for multifarnay housing are gym, rally two spaces per
unit, with an additional requirement of one guea space per every four units.
ParIcing requirementx for Senior CRizen housing and Congregate Care are
reduced to ',q spaces per ttnit and one space per five tati~ for'gue$t parlcing.
Temecula's draft ~ndards are comparable to other ~ in River~e County
and are not idenafted as a cortaraint to development.
2. Subdivision Ordinance
Statc law rcquiru local governments to adopt 'a Subdivision Ordinance. The
Subdivision Ordinan~ governs thc prce_~__g of converting raw laud into
development sites.' Staz Law grants local govcr~_ments the authorities to
rcgulatc thc dc~ign and improvements of subdivisions and to impose dedication
and cxaaions on dcvelopex~. The Subdivision Map A~t c~mblishcs sxatcwidc
uniformity in lcr. al subdivision pr~ccdurcs; standards ~r dc~ign and
improvcmcn~s axe lcf:t to local gcvcr-mcut discrction- As noted above, the
Subdivixlon Ordinance being used by the City ix the Connty .of Rivmide's
S~n Onanance 460.
Thc Subdivision Ordinaucc lflcc all land usc ccmtrols, can be so restrictive as to
incn:asc cost of dcvclopmcnt and stific dcvclopmcat intcxmt. The
Ordinance used by the City ix the satne or siznaar to the re~~ imposed
by many other local govemme~ in Riverside County, and therefore doe$ not
pose any special consxraintx on the production of boasing. Tcmccula con~rms
to the procedural x~quiremcnts csxablishcci in the Subdivision Map ~ and docs
not impose additional r~uit~cnts. -
3. BuUdin Codes
Building C.~cs xt-gulaz thc physical c~nstruc~on of dwcllings and includc
plmnbing, clcctrical and mcchanical divisions. Thc ~ of the Building Code
and its ca~,~cn~ Ls to pro~ct thc public f~m unsaf= bx,,*lalrtSg and unsa.fc
conditions associatcd with constnnion- The City of Trrnec,,l~ enforces the
Uniform Building Code as cstablishcd by Ststc Law. Statc affords local
gOVernmODe with SOmC ficr, ibillty WhCD adopting the ,mlfnrtn codes: thc building
codes can be amended based an gcoSraphicai, topolo~ical or climamlo~ical
CITY OF ~CLTLA Housing Element
Table 4-25
City. of Temeeula
Housing Plan S,,mm-ry
~ ] P!sn O~ectivs
Housing P~ (# Units to bs Funcling
I:HOVISION OF ABEQUATE HOUSING
land Use Plvlfideallngeof Adequllel'llidlnl~s~sst~
-'.ement/7.=ning mcc~,,,,r4a. me regional fair
O~inance share deem~ined aI MB 129
Vw/brow;, -1ill3'/Leemr;,
and Emmgenmf and
Transillonsl Sheltsm
sbmlem'emergmmY
shems.
andemetVencymmb~in
el ..... i;,~-~ :-~1 bCT' Id4r~
zonel. Tkeee wse ~'~qll
aubil&ll flIT
ASSIST IN DEVELOPMENT OF AFFQRDA81.~ HOUSING
Band Fmmm~g remmtemmship
kmm-m~lm
mheusehe~
Pmvidmhmr~imnd
mlmmmdfmEei.mfe'
h ." rm(
oppr. zmL~7 ~m kmm-
tncmmlmmmmtdm.
Norm ~ml
Nmmmmmm~
Noe ~
Res;ansll:le ~ TIme
AgenW Frame
Planning Depment Two Years
P!mming ~m~t One year
T~mym
DevmV~.,K.J,
Depr
Piemeg Dmr
Provision of Adequate Housing Sites
1. Land Use Element/Zoning Ordinan~
The Land Use Element gf the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinanc~ provide the
planning and rc~uiatory framework: neces-~ary to achieve adequate housing sites.
The Land Use Plan providcs for development of a range of housing, at varying
dcnsities. The densities nngc from .1 units per acre for lands in gas designated
Hillside Rcsidcntiah to 20 units pcr acre in the High Density ca=gory.
The ZOn;ng OrrJin~nce tail provide r~lllatory i/3ccnfives for the development of
affordable housing. The DensiW Bonus allows for additional intcnsiW in
residential dcvclopmcnt which includes aff-rdable housing. With m~ard to the
nccds of the homelc~, the ZOnqng Ordin~nC~ will allow for development of
emergency and Wansitional shelters in specified ar,.as.
Objective:
Adequate residential sites to accommodate the regional fair share
dctcrmincd at ~I23 Very Low;, 15,"137 Lower; :51171
Moderate; and ".25~.33 Above Moderim income households.
2. Sites for ~..mergency and Trnn-~itional Shelters
ObjecUve:
Adopt a Zoni._. O~i-.-cc which permits transitional and
emergency housing in oommemial and indus:rinl zones Med/um
and .H"zgh ~ Den.~ zones, and conditionally permits
shelters in the remaining Re. sidzntial.zones and Commerdal and
I~ zones. The.r,e u~e~ vrill bo subject m discretionary
appnyntl.
3. Landbnnldn~
Landbankin~ is the acquisition of land by public agcncies in anticipation of future
d~clopmcnt. This technique scrves as a hedge afainst speculation and i-~adon
as it secures land for affmdablc housing, until funhc~ resources ax~ available for
their development. Where dcvclopmcnt of rtz land is not fi:asiblc, thc local
agcncy can sell the land at ~t rate, and capturc the increase in vsluc for such
public usc~, e.g., senior/low-income housing.
Open Sptzce/Con3ervo~on Ele.-n, enr
A numbcr of additional improvcmcnn arc currcndy underway or being piann~..
Thesc im~rovcmcnn include the c~ns.truction of a corn-unity ~,=:adcn
pool cox~plcx and amphitheater at the Sports Park, and other faciiities at Pala
Park.
The City has a joint usc a~-c~ncnt with the Tcmccula Valley Unified School
Distria which allows the City to utilize school facfiides, School facilities arc
gcncrally open to the public dttdng non-school hours, weekends and vacations.
Duc to ~xc partial availability of school recreation facilities to thc public at large,
such facilities arc considcrai adjuncts to the city-widc park system. Tablc
below provides a s-m~--'7 of thc cxistin~ facilities at the school sites for use by
thc public.
Table S4
Temecuin ~a!ley Unified School District
Ex~ne_ School Facilities
Marprim Middis
Locatioa
nor~ of De Pormla Road
eNorth of La Scrcna Way,
Norm o~ Rancho V',-~m
~ at 1~ L~m Ddve
Ner~ of Nkolm Road,
west of ~cscp. h Road
North of Rancho Callfoma,
Soum at Pauba Road, west
North of F, umey Road,
ustof~AaMonnsy
SourhofRsnc~ Vlsu
east of Marprim
Nm'th ef wot. r v=~,
R.ecresxioa Fscllttim
playSrounds, Hszdbs]], Basketball
Vollvfoall
Veil.v/haft, ~,,c~mn, F-edb',ll
Plaidrounds. l~..dh.., Sv. dp'-,',i-Z
T~bm'krall. BuiccmalL
Voll=yba]l, W~dt'~!l., BasebaJL T
Cogre, F. ootl~tl. p-,~,t-,n, Sofibal~
Soccerfield
p,ebet~,l~ Tc~mi~ Courrh Vollsybail,
Socc=rficld., C~,,,',',=
Pb~wroun~ a~m.b~ Voa,~bd-~
Tgh~rba~
~ rccrcadon f~:ili~cs arc found lrimarlly in planned comm,,-ides and
apartment mmpln~ ~aese facilities usually ix~lude remus courts or a
b-~leptb-ll cnurt, The endsting fadlilies ax~ so fnw that they have a minor impm:t
on m~-til~ the d~'ns~ed f~r parks and rccrufion facilities within the COmm~nlty.
There axe also scvenl existi~ commet'cial mczudon facilities within the City
and Sphere of Infiucnce including fi:mr ;olf courses. Two additional ~olf cotu~cs
'r~b~OX~R~A · Dsc July 26, L~93 Pap ~
...'.:."""'
i i,.,.,.,..~"""'-t~:
....._.b~ \ ,'.-."~
;!.-".' ", .""',">.'_ ~-,'~"'"'.'-
,.'...}i .--.
., ?._. .
~ DIRECTION
-. .~ . ~ _~;_.!~Z' /
"'-,'y~,,'-~...-'
"'~' ,~ .
· j * **'. ** ,, ~' \
al Plan Prosram
FIGLFR~
CITf ~CI.K~. O.ven Spar¢!Coruervario.. E!ement
10.
Historic and Culturally Signiacant Rc,sourc~ including: 2.3 rcsorded
axchaeological sites; 47 properties _I~_ed on the Historic Resourr.~ Inventory
prepared by Riverside County; four listings on the California Inventory of
Historic Resources; and several historic resources of local importanc~ including
the Butterfield Overland Stage Route. The Temecula properties I~ted in the
California Inventory of I-iismric Resources are the Murriem Creek Archaeological
Area, Temecula's first Post Of:tic. c, Tcmecula Quarri~, and the Little Temecula
Rancho Adobe. The archaeological sites include prehistoric sites, sites occupied
by Native Axnerican-% and historical sit~ associated with the occupation of
Tcmecula Valley by Europeans and Euro-Ame~cans. Figur~ 5-6 and 5-7'
identify the sensitive amhaeological and paleontological r~outr~ of the Study
Aru. Due to the presence of reliable water souxces and a fertile valley floor, the
Temecula area has always been a desinble pla~ to live. Temec',fia contains
many older structure, historic sites and district, and. archaeological evidence
which may be threatened with demolition or removal as urbanization continues.
Nighttime skies within the Mk Palomar ObserVatory conservation areas. The City
is within close In'O3dmity to thc Palomar Observatory which requires unique
nighttime lighting restrictions. Generally, Observatory sites need to be 30 to 40
miles from larg¢ lighted areas so that the nighttime sky will not be bright¢ned.
The County of San DiogoC/*9, of Temecu~ has adopted an anfinsnce which
restricts nighttime lighting for ar~as within a 15-mile radius and a 45-mile radius
of Palomar Observatory. Southeastern portions of the Study Area are within a
15-mile radius of the 0bservamry and should boare subject to so/agent lighting
controls and some Ftmitation of uses that may generate significant amounts of
//ght and g/are to pre~rve nighttime skies ('Figtn'~ 5-8).
The Open Space/Conservation Plan ('Figure 5-9) identifie~ the undeveloped areas of the
Study Area which, at a minimum, should remain as open space or extremely low
density development for the conservation of r~ourc~, including water, wildIll=, and
slopes. Policy 8uidanc~ for the dedication of open spac~ for public health and safety
is provided in the Public Safety Element.
D. Mineral Resources
State law requires the General Plan to address the ned for conserving mintral
resources within the General Plan Study Area. The State Division of Mines and
Geology has prepared mineral resom'ce report8 designating the mineral deposit8 of
statewide or regional ~ce, that are to be used to address mineral resources
within the Sttaty Area. The report efttitled, Mineral Land Cla~cation Of the
Temescal Valltv Area. Riverside County California, Svecial Revort I65. evaluates
the rningml deposits of the Temecula Study Area. This report was prepared in
accordance with the ,Surface Mining and Reclamaaon Act (SMARA) of 2975.
The State Geologist has classi. aed areas into Mineral Resource Zones (&tXT) and
Scienti~ Resource Zones (SZ). :the zones identify the statewide or regional
'l'~..OX',O~P.,Ot~A · Da~ July 2.6, 1993
Pag~ f-ll
CITY OF Th'MECLILA Open Space/Conservation
significance of mineral deposits based on the economic value of the de;osits and
accessibility. W'tXhin the City of Tem~da, it~ Sphere of Influence, and the
Environmental Study Ar~a, th~ zoning classification of M.RZ-3a has b~n appiied by
the State. The btRZ-3 arias contain s~Iim~ntary d~posits which have the potential
for supplying sand and gravd for concr~tt and crushd stone for agFegate,
however, these areas ar~ dtitrmintd as not containing deposits of significant
tconornic value based on the available data.
· r~.,.4mx,tms,a{A · Dss~ Jdy 2.6. ~
Pa~
T--he City of
~ EMBCULA
General Plan Program
FIGUI~
C'~, 7'Y .' F ~ CULA Growth Management/Public F aciii:'.'es Element
Ill.
SUMMARY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND. RELEVANT ISSUES
Facilitic~ and s¢rvic=s provided in T¢mccula may b¢ cat¢goriz~ as ¢kher 1) thos¢ und¢r
the direct re~ponsibiliVy and authority of the City, elthcr dircc',ly or through conwaa
arrangcmcnts; or 2) those under the responsibility and authority of another unit of
gOVernrnCllt which arc vitally knponant to the well being of the City and its citizens.
The facilities and services under direct City responsibility include:
· Fu~ protection (contracted to Rivcnide County F'h-c Department)
· Paramedic ~mer~cncy Scrvices (conwactcd to Rivcrside County Flrc Deparuncnt)
· Policc/Shcriff (conwacted to Riverside County Sheriff's Dcpar~cnt)
· Civic Center
· Flood Control/Drainage (local storm drain facilities)
· Solid Wastc (conu'aacd to privatc cornpanics)
The facilities and servic,.-s currcn~y under other governmental n:sponsibility include:
PER CC
DIRECTION ·
Library (Riverside County)
Water Supply (Rancho California Water District)
Sanitary Sewer Facilities (Eastan Municipal Water District)
Schools (Tcmccula Valley Unified School District)
Flood Conu'ol (major facilities by Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District)
G~s and Electric S~rvice
The differences arc significant in terms of the City's ability to control policies, programs
and budget related to these functions- The City has direct control in the tint ategory and
thcrefor~ exercises direct authority over level of servic~ standards. Whcn= contraa services
ax~ provident, such as fire and police protection, the City may address level of servic~
standards through thc contract proc.~s.
The City may only in~tcnco dccisions rc~arding thc sccond catc~,uv/. Thus, thc lcvcis of.
service my or may not bc to the City's liking. h those cases, the option w~uld be to find
ways of ncgotiatin~ changes if the City desired different standards.
An additional consideration is thc dc~rcc of control thc City has over placin~ conditions of
approval on proposed dcvelopmcnt projects regarding public services that ate impacted by
a project. Again, thc City has the ability to impose conditions direcfiy ~ the tint
category and only indL, P.x:~y in the second.
A, Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Services
The Riverside County Fire Dcparuncnt (RCFD), who operates in conjunction with thc
California Department of For~sxry and Fxrc Proxcction (CDF), provides fire protection
services on a conwact basis to the City. The City conwact provides fun~;-~ for 23.6
firc Ix~so-ncl.
T~M~6GP~ * July 26, 1.99'3
6-10
~ Pre'~ 3i~d Fir: $~ations
j~ She,~ffs D~ar:m:nu
Coumy 3uaUc:- C--nr:: .
J J
-.'1 !Library.
J J
· L 'Fr=nch Vall~y Air~or~
PER CC
DIRECTION
'v,-he Ci.ty of
General Plan Program
-/i
RGLTI~ 6-1'
16" C L~nc
Line
II
II
I1'
30" Gas
ENmCULA i;.Z:,' ii
P
General Plan togram /Z/
115 K VOLT T1R,~NSMISSION LINES
[\
.J
I I
I I
I I
! I
I
I
I
I
....../.
, Exisging or uncl~r consu-uczion
: ].J_~ K Volt Transmission Line
~rhe City of
.fEMECULA
General Plan Program
C~7:' 'YF~M~CULA Growth Management/Public Facili;ies Element
SoLid Waste Disposal
The City. proearly contracts with two private fixms for solid waste dL~posal. Both
haulers transport the City'S wasz to the El Sobrante Landfill, located in unincorporated
Riverside County, south of Corona- The ]~l Sobrante Landfill is a Class HI landfill
with a life expectancy though the year 2002. The landfill occupie,s 160 acres and
ac~pts an average of 900 tons per day. Western Waste Indu.stries, the owner and
operator of the landfill, has indicated that expansion of the facility could increase the
life expectancy. Expansion plans a~ currenfiy under prepantion.
The City began implemntation of its curbside recycling program in the fall of 1991.
The purpose of this program is to reduc2 solid waste disposal through r~ycling and
cornposting of wasus. Residents in the City separate r~cyclable materials and garden
materials fxom their ws~te. Recyclablc materials ~ transported to a c2nter in Pcrris
for proc~sing. Garden materials are hauled to a separate facility for cornposting, and
the remaining waste is hauled to the E1 Sobrante Land fill.
S-fficicnt ladfill capacity to accommodate projected growth is an issue the City must
addr~,s. The City will adopt its Source Reduction and Recycling Eiement (SSRE) in
Fall 1993, pumuant to State law. Implementation of the SSRE programs: ax~ nec~,-ssary
to achieve the 25 percent diversion goal by 1995 and 50 per~nt dive,'~ion pal by
2000.
D. Libraries
The City of Tcmccula is a member of the Rivcrsidc County Library Disu'ict[' This
District maintains 25 library facilities throughout Riverside County, in both
nrfincorporated and incorporated areas. :
A 15,000 square foot h"orary facility has rccen~y opened in the Walt Abraham
Administrative Center, north of Winchester Road (Figur~ 6-1). Thc facility was
originally intendcd to scrvc residents in the southwest arcs of -ni-corporated Riverside
County. Howcver, as a r~sult of Tcmccula's incorporation, thc Tcmccula Library. is
now located within City boundarics. The' library will contain 50,000 volumes and is
anticipated to be adequate to serve thc current populations of thc Cities of Muftieta
and Temecula-
The issue of grutest importance to the Library District is adequate funding to provide
for its adopted library service standards. The standards call for 1.2, vobvn~es and .5
square ~ of library space per capita. Thc District curvzn~y provides only .lS square
f~et and .97 volumes p~ capita County-wide. R~,enue for the I,x'brary District is
obtained from a Special District tax colleaed by the County. However, the District
compeus with other' County agencies for this funding, and therdore the l~'el of
funding to the County Library is uncertain. Demand for libraries goes hand in hand
with population incresses. The library is often s~n as a community symbol, a sourc~
of community identification. Although th~ Temecula Library is currenfiy adequate to
CITY OF 7'~'V~CULA Growth Management/Public Facilities
Ge
Educational Facilities
The Teanecula Valley Unifie~t School District serves the C~ncral Plan Study Ax=a. The
District maintains th~ full spec=um of rxiuca~ional facilities from day car~ to adult'
cam. Table 6-i identLfi~s the educational facilities in the General Plan Study Am,
with the ~t capacity and enrollment levels of each facility.
Table 6-3
School Facilities
~arollment
as of
Current July
Name location Capacity 1993
· _ ....... ~.. .,...,,.,,, . ,.,. . ......... ~..r.,; .,. ,." ';o"' ~*": .:;; ~""' '~' "'; ;.,,,"', '~"',.."";e...,~., P;~.L.'~'
!{'D.,~' ~C:~h~,...~... ~.-.,'~.." '..!.". ~.",~.~;~". ~!.~,,'~ '!",. ~.fi~,~; ...~. '~:,~. '~..!.~ .~' , ",'~'''" ",
· Rancho Day Caz= 131530 La S~'~a Way i .~ 74 ; ~ ~4
V~DayC,~ 129915~,araL~maDdv= I 00~41
I ra2s Xi,, ,"u, ,"fa, xoad i 74 I
l:tcd t.hwk Day ~ [32045 Camh~ San 3=e Crcmccuta) J 9O [ i,S 90
Ranclzo El=m=nmry 131~30 La S~-=a Way [ ~ 930 { 84~ 861
loan F. Sparkman ] 3~'~ Pio Pico Road [ ~ 1,I03 I ~ 888
Tcmccuta ~lcmenmry t 41.951 Moraga Road ] 1 810 ~ ~ 750
Vail Blcracntary [ 29915 brim Loma Drive 060 755 ~ ~
Nicoiss Va!lq ~-~-,,',~,,,y' 1396oo N. C-en=nl ~ (Temecala) ~ 1,045 I 43~ 727
lVl~la Middle 130600 ~m Rosd } 9!_e 1d99 I ~ 1,046
· r=n=ma M~dd~ 142o~s Mudows ~-,ray 0~0 Z,OgO t r,~ Z,Oe9
T~m~'ula Vallay 131555 9ancho V~m Road ~
2,420 I
Ranc~ vmn 13~340 9znc~o v~.~ ':Road I '-".; 1~ I ~ z37
Te. mc=~ Ad~t Sdmo| 1 33350 Ranotto V'~ta Road I n/a I n/a I
The District r,.cendy completed an expansion phase and as a tzSult has s-mcicnt
permanent facilifiea to meet cttmmt student pop,,1-tio--~ through the ttxe ofpetwxanent
and interim factT~es. As shown in Tabl= 6-3, th= capacity of school facilities is
uses' interim and relocatablc facilitics to 23oommodate sftldo~ iR OXO~ Of t~e
T~&0X~SlP-6gO. Mffr * July 26, 1993 Pa~ 6-1.9
CI~' TExMECULA Growth Management/P~blic Facilities Element
Quasi-public uses include churches; counseling cente:s; cultural facilities (t~eatres,
auditoriums, museums, zoos, c:c.); day car_c_ facilities; medical facilities; social service
centers; and similar public serving uses. Quasi-public uses are frequently, tjctough not
always, funded and operated by non-profit organizations. Such uses differ from public
facilities and services in that they do not typically have legally prescribed standards
and not normally rcquixcd as a condition of approval for private development projoe=.
It is common to accommodate quasi-public uses through a ci~y's land use policies and
regulations, while prescribing special development standards. Such uses do not
generally have level of service standards. Qualitative standards arc part of the
evaluation and negotiation process associated with each development project as it is
propose& To the ma~m-m extent possible, it is desinblc to cluster q,,~i-public uses
in activity centers, where the facilities can reinforce other activities (such as retail or
service businesses) and benefit fxom the availability of other services (such as but
transportation). '
PER CC
DIREC'RON
J. Gas and Electric Sffvice
Southern California Edison supplies dtazidty to the Study Area via .underground
and overhead fin6. $CE'$ main substain is located on M'tra Loma Drive in the
City of Tetnecula. SC~ is a public utility and thsrefort functions on demand,
Extensions for electrical service to new devdopmznts are governed by rules
esrablishexl by the Public Utilities Commission of California. The hierarchy of
establishing electrical power lines from generation stations to cuswmers is as
follows: wansmission .line; sub-wansmission line; and service lin~. Figure 6-5
locates the ~g Wan,vmi,~a' n lin~ in the cotnmunity which carry the main
electrical supply to smaller distribution lin~s,
Natural gas is providd by the Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), Plasac
and seed underground lints are located throughout the Study Area, A small number
of residents not serviced by SCGC utilize bottled propane or butane fuel Fadsang
gas lin~ are shown on Figur~ 6-6,
T~I-OXXO~3P~ItOJ.~'F · July 26, 199'3
Pag~ 6-21
CITY OF ~[ECULA Public
locctcd ovc the Study Area. Somc e.xisting development in the Study Arc:.. is
potcutially cxp, os~ to air tm~c accideuts._L-'
G. Nuclear Hazards from San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station
Thc San Onofns Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) is located in Camp Pcndlcton
in San Diego Coun~ approximately 25 miles west of Tcm~cula. Radioaaivc by-
products are contained within thc' plant, with the exception of small quantities of
radioactive ps mlcascd into the air and liquids mimed into the Paci~c O-c-ccan. The
rclcascs am monitored by SONGS pcmonncl; and according to SONGS, radiation
exposure duc to material releases is less than thc typical exposure from natural
backn~'ound radiation, Thc two most likcly sources of radiation cont~?nin~fion arc
wanspormtion accidcnts involving u'znsport of radioactive materials and unconlmlled
rclcases at the plant site.'
The U.S. Nuclear Rcgulatory Commission has identified the area surrounding every
nuclear ~:ncmting station as an Emcr~cncy pl-n~,ing Zonc (EPZ). The State of
California has dcfincd the arca outside, and adjacent to the EPZ as a Public Education
Zonc (PEZ). The Federal Government esmb~hes ~c area with a 50-mile radius
round every nuclm gr, ncrating station as au ~lion Pathway Zonc CI~Z)- The
Tcmccula Study Area is located in thc IPZ (l~u'c 7-5),
Emergency Preparedness
The City of T~mecuia has adopted a Mui~-H,~rd Functional Plan pm~,-r~t to thc
California Emergency Services Act. The pzimax? Objective of the plan is to ~nsu~ the
cffcctivc mana~nent of City pcrsonncI and msoumes in nnpondin~ to emerge-hey
situations stenning f~m nannl disasten, technological incidents and nuclear dcfcnsc
emcrpncies.
The plan includes a nnpons~iIity mauix which dclinostes specific responsibilities to
City dspanments or pczsonncl in the ~vent of an em~c'y. The plan also includes
a comprehensive hazard analysis that addresses the seven following areas: carthq-~,
hazardous material incident; flooding; dam failure; major ~ld.fi~ nuclur incident;
trnn~pormtion incidenL
TI~ Mnlti-Hnvd Fnnfond ,Pln Fevi~ts a gszmzl ~ on tl~
mzaes in the wenZ of a disas~. Du~ to the tmpm~cf-~ility of tl~ impaa of a
d;pv~er on ~tr~ets and highways, app, opv~f~ ~,~n roza~ c~P.o$ he pre-
d~m,,ine. d. In gmzrd, all may~ ~ h~ channd~ to thz ~ .fr,~ys,
highw,ayx, and oth~ majar art~als. I-1-~ wdfl san,, ax th~ nm'fh-xour. h
channd. W'mdmimr Road and Ram:ho Califo~ .n71 be used for
January
CITY F 'I"EMECULA P:~lic Sa.f~..'y El~m~n~
Once the decision to evacuate is made, the public will be alerted and given
evacuation inst'rac~ns by various means, including school alert/monitor receivers,
AM/FM radio announctments, TV ann'buncements, sirens, mobile loud speakers,
haaers, and p~onal contac~
Movement information provideM to the public will include the following:
· Why they must oa~utt~.
· Roatts to takt, including condiaons of roads, bridge~, and frt~way ov~rpasses.
· W77Z: to do ~f a yehicle brtalc$ down.
· ~ locations of i~stmbly points for those withoat-access to atttomobiIe~.
· Whert to go for mass cars until tht tmtrgtncy situation has passteL
7-14
CTi'Y OF Th'MECULA Community Design ~Iement
C,
~'illage Center Concepts
The Land Usc Elcmcnt describes thc conce"~t of the development d Villagc C,:ntc~
throughout thc Tcmccula area. Thc intent of thc Village C~ntcr Conccp. t is'to' provide
opponunitic~ for development of mixtures of commercial and residential us~ rJut w~l
mlnlm~?c vehicular circulation Wips, avoid sprawling of commercial dcvclopmcnt, and
offer inc~ntivc~ for high qualiW urban dc~i_~n. While each of the Village C,~nters may
dcveiop with dif~r~nt criteria, regulations, and visual themes, there arc ~x'min
common clcmcnts that should bc addressed as a part of each ViIlage Ccnzr Plan. The
following llluswates these common ccnsidcraxions or what could bc described as the
'palcne of design concepts' for a Village Center ~c~ M~ry of tYxese ~ concep~
~v'e also app//ca/~le fo deve/o/~,~xt/rvjectx o~ fJze V'zZ/~e Cent~'s. TIxe
deveZopmer~ oJe beney~cizd mixne'es of uses, slxax ed par]dng f-dl~ies, ~zrd ped~-
ode~td design, re e_,~-ni~Zes of tYxe co~w~ts tJ~ sitohM be encon~zgd tJ~oughonz
~e commune.
1. ~ of Uses
A Villa~c Ccnzr is intended to includc a diversity of different types of land uses.
While retail dcvclopmcnt may be the primary land use, it is cnvisioned that thc
Villa~ Center will also include additional cmploymcnt opportunities such =s
offices, and pcx~onal scrvicc shops. Community meeting ccnn:~s could be
included for private or public acthn'ties. Residential development could bc
inte~-atcd with the non-residential uses- The mixun~ of land uses could be in
separate s~ or ccnnbincd within a singlc building. One possibility is to
havc retail use on the ~ound floor level, of:rico uses on thc second level, and
residential ,,r,i~s on. the uppcr levels.
Tna-~XU~OP-COM.ESS * Draft Din=. 3sintory ~, 1993
CIT'-, TEM~CULA Comn'~ni~ Desi,~ Element
.='. Chaparrat Area
The ChaparraI Ar~a is characterized'~Y moderately doped hillsides above dry
washbeds. Exiaing development conxi~ of segmented lot patterns of varying ~zes.
This area Forides an oppommity to transition down from the larger low found in
the Los Ranchito$ and Santiago RsRtrt$ areas to the south and wea. Special
development considwations are necessary to a.~ure development does not exceed the
carrying capacity of the area, wtdle ~ providing appropriate tran,s~n of density.
[btm F. tW~I
The methods identified below should be rtfmtd and incorporatut within the
Development Code and other regulations and ordinances.
1. Co~ Ar~a$ are recognized as having the following characttristic$:
· ~ Ar~as with natural slopes of ;5% or greater.
b. Arta~ within natural drainage courses.
c. Areas with stnsiave biological ravout~ts as identified or referenced in the
Genzral Plan or site s~ec~c ~udy.
Enwoachmtnt of grading, conswuaion or surface alteration aaivit~
(induding leach f21ds) shall not ~xceed 15% of the Conm'aint Aria-
Notwithxtanding this guiddin~ said aaivit~ shall l~ a~oide. d ~ xpecifw
miagations can'be implemented to reduce pottutial impact~ to a levd of
't'~d-OX~a0OP.4:Z3M. l:a~ · Draft Daw.: Augrot ~.0, I9~
CITY OF TEMECULA Communi.ty Design
Proposed building pads, driveways and sepac-leach field loce. ziat~ thai2 be
shown on the tentative map.
3. A written ~tatern~ (Form ~AN 53) from the Health O.~cer of Riverside
County Department of E .nvironmentat Health shall be provided stating the type
of sewage dirposal that waI be permitted for the proposed lotz.
4. All drainage areaz 'will remain natural (no undergrounding or placement in v-
glitches). Use of energy dis~ipator$, retention ~ or alesilting basins, will be
permitted as deemed nece.s~ary by the Director of Public Worics.
Joint access and driveways shall be required to the greatest e:aent possible to
reduce impacts.
Residences sho_,;_t~ be designed using alternative foundation techniques to
maintain the ~ topography to the greatest extent po~=ible. Rather than
using caUn~e grading to create flat building areas, ~tepped and pier and beam
foundations shall be encouraged. Retainm' g walls interior to the stracture are
encouraged over ~tern wall8 along the exterior face of the ~tructure.
No graded slopes shall exceed a 2d grcuaent. The nutximum vertical height of
graded slopes over a 3d gradient shall be 10 feel .
Where grading occurs, finished slopes should be contoured with land form
grading, rather than a formal engineered look.
Retaining walls shall be discouraged to the greatest e.=tent possible, parric;;_t_,,,ly
bgween a aruaure and the public view. Crib walls or zimfi,,- gructures, shall
be used in lieu of retaining walls when possible and planted with appropriate
shrubs and vines. Whe~ retaining walls are used and vizible from the public
view, the wall shall be colored block or color coated to match the natural earth
tone of the area or planted with appropriate vines.
10. To $ea better trauiaon from a~acent areas, lotz adjacent to Santiago
Road shall have a minimum lot size of 1.75 acres.
11. Roadways and driveways shall be limited to a m_,,_,';,num gra~ of 15%.
2'he Land Use EZenent designates the Chaparral Area as low Re.sidena~ however,
much of the Chapatml ~ is bu,pp, optlate for development of half 4cre lots. The
Development Code will bnplement the Low R~ desigaatlon through two
zoning dLm'ic~ These dLm.ictr will have different development arandard~ such as
half-acre and one-acre minimum lot size. Based upon the above poUci~ it can be
anticipated that much of the Chaparral Area w~ be zoned for the larger one-acre
lot a~zes.
Draft Date: .Am&n~ 10, 1993
Page 10-29
CIT:'; ~'F-t~v~ECULA Community Design Element
Neighborhood Compabiiity
Special attention has bten given in the ~neral Plan to the interface between rural
residential and urban development. However, the compatibility between the
character of existing single-family neighborhoods and adjacent proposed projects is
also an important considergaon within the community. Key considerations in the
planning and design of projects adjacent to existing single-family neighborhoods
includes the following:
Proposed land use densiaes should provide a density transiaon or buffer
to improve compatibility with adjacent neighborhoods;
Proposed projects should be designed in terms of height, architeaural
style, bulk, location of parlcing, and vehicular and non-vehicular access,
to be compatible with surrounding neighborhoods; and
design of commercial and oj~ce projects should allow for convenient
non-vehic:__d__~rr access by adjacent neighborhoods to the extent feasible.
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
ATTORNEY OPINIONS AND RELATED CORRESPONDENCE
REGARDING SCHOOL FACILITY POLICIES AND AB 1287
R:\S\GENPL,AblXGPCCI0 10/1~93 klb ~ 2
LAW OFFICES
SUITE
COSTA MESA, ~IFQ~NIA
(716) S45-5SS9
t, OI ANOfi. rS OrwICr
611 W[ST SIXTH 5TIe[fT. SUIT{ ZSOQ
LOS ANG[~[S. CALIFORNIA 90017
(ll3) z3e*oeoo
T~EC0PIER: (~J3) 136-2700
October 4, 1993
J. Sal Munoz, Mayor
and City Councilmembers
CITY OF TEMECULA
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Re: General Plan - School Facilities
Dear Mayor Munoz and Councilmembers:
I have carefully reviewed the attached compromise
language regarding school facilities to be incorporated into the
Public Facilities element of the General Plan as well as the
General Plan Implementation Program. I fully support the
language that was developed over the past two weeks during
discussions between City and.School District Staff and Kemper. I
recommend it for adoption as I believe it to be consistent with
the current state of the law, as well as anticipating the
possibility that the defeat of Proposition 170 will result in the
repeal of SB 1287 and the reduction of school impac~ fees.
Sincerely,
Scott F. Field
City Attorney
CITY'OFTEMECULA
Gary Thornhill
John Meyer
Growth Management/Public Facilities Bement
School Facility Policies
At the September 21 meeting, the Council heard extensive testimony regarding the School
Facilities language in the general plan. After an in-depth discussion, the Council directed staff
to meet with the School District and representatives from Kernper Community Development
one last time to work out language agreeable by all parties. A meeting was held at the school
district offices on Tuesday September 28. The City received revised language from both the
School District and Kernper. As a result, staff is recommending the following language:
GOAL 4
A quality school system that contains adequate facilities and funding to educate
the youth of Temecula.
Discussion
Adequate school facilities and funding are necessary to ensure that the high
quality of education is extended to future residents of the City. Mitigating
impacts of development on the school system through the provision of school
sites, the imposition of statutory development fees and negotiated development
fees as permitted by law, as well as providing information to the School District
are the primary mechanisms to sustain quality educational services.
Policy
4.1
Coordinate with,the Temecula Valley Unified School District, when
considering General Plan amendments, specific plans, zone changes or
other legislative land use policy decisions, to support the School District
in providing adequate school facilities for students for new development
to the extent permitted by law,
Policy 4.2
Promote and encourage the phasing of project development so that the
School District may plan, finance, and construct facilities intended to
serve the development.
Policy 4.3
Review proposed legislative land use decisions in the context of the
adequacy of present and future facilities as permitted by law.
Policy 4,.4
Provide safe access for school children walking, bicycling, or driving to
and from school sites through coordination between the School District
and City Departments of Planning, Public Works and Engineering.
Stite DeBdline for General Plln Adoption: November 25, 1993
R:~S\GI~PL.AI~GP.CC9 10/5/93 lab 4
Policy 4.5
Pursue the establishment of a trade school, junior college, or four-year
college in Temecula which ~fers an emphasis in education required by
the engineering, biotechnical and biomedical industries located' in
Temecula.
Policy 4.6
Plan for the joint use of school/municipal facilities wherever feasible and
desirable, including the joint use of school grounds, buildings, City
parks, multipurpose buildings and recreational facilities.
'Implementation Program
C. School Facilities
1.
Request the School District to provide the City with information concerning
potential impact~ associated with proposed residential development. The
information should include a status report of the available school facilities to
serve proposed projects, To the extent that adequate school facilities are not
available on a timely basis, the City will seek to assist the District and
developers in arriving at a solution to provide adequate school facilities, as
permitted by law.
Coordinate with developers and the School District to ensure that school sites
are adequately sized and located to meet increases in demand. Require
proposed projects with school sites to include a phasing plan that links project
development with the provision of a school facility when needed.
Since S.B. 1287 places substantial constraints on the City in this area, the City
will enter into a continuing dialogue among interested parties to create an
implementation program that is in compliance with state law and meets the
needs of the school District and the City's needs for adequate and affordable
housing and economic development. Should S.B. 1287 be repealed as a result
of rejection of Proposition 170 on the state-wide ballot November' 2, 1993, the
City Council shall establish a school mitigation resolution which specifies the
procedures to be followed 'by the City, School District and developers in order
to determine school facilities impact associated with residential development,
available sources of funding for .school facilities necessitated by such
development and the appropriate mitigation measures. The resolution would
provide for procedures consistent with those under County Resolution 93-131,
which apply to the County portion of the Temecula Valley Unified School
District, as permitted by law.
State Deadline for General Plan Adoption: November 25, 1993
R:\S~GEqPLA/~GP.CC9 10~5/9'3/fib 5
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
. RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE EIR
R:~S~GENPLA,~GPCCIO 10/1~/93 ldb 13
ATTACHlV~-NT NO. 3
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RF.~OLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF
TEMECUIA CERT~YING ~ FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT FOR ~ GENERAL PLAN AND ADOPTING A STATEMENT
OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR ~ GENERAL PLAN FOR
~ CITY OF II~IECULA.
W!~,RE&S, Section 65300 of the Government Code requires that cities adopt a
comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the jurisdiction as well
as any adjacent areas which, in the judgement of the city, bears a relationship to its planning;
and
WRERI~.&S, Sections 65302 of the Government Code requires that a general plan
address the following issues: land use, circulation, housing, conservation of natural resources,
'open space, noise, and public. safety; and
WFrEREAS,. Sections 65303 of the Government Code allows the City to include any
other issues or concerns into the general plan which may relate to the physical development of
the City; and
WI~,RE&S, the process of preparing the General Plan has included a number of
opportunities for public and citizen involvement included a number of town meetings, technical
committee meeting and public hearings, and by making' numerous copies of the plan and
associated documents available to the public; and
W1TEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as amended (Sections
21000 through 21177 of the Public Resources Code), requires that prior to the approval of any
project the Lead Agency consider the potential impacts. and effects of said project, consider
alternatives to the project, and identify mitigation measures necessary to reduce or eliminate the
impact of the pwject on the environment; and
WIHr, REAS, the City of Temecuh prepared an Initial Study for the General Plan and
determined that an Environmental Impact Report (h'aR) would be required for the General Plan
in accordance with the pwvisions of CF, QA and the CEQA Guidelines prepared by the Office
of Planning and Research; and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecuh issued a Notice of Preparation on May 12, 1992; and
WItEREAS, the a number of comments were received concerning the scope and content
of the EIR for the General Plan which were used to guide the preparation of the Draft EIR; and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecuh issued a Notice of Completion for the Draft EIR on
August 12, 1992; and
R:\S\GF..NPLAN~OI~CCI0 10~18/93 !fib 14
WHRREAS, the Draft RIp, was available for public review and comment from August
14 through September 27, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the City received a number of letters with comments and concerns about
the content of the Draft laIR for the General Plan; and
WH'ERR~S, the State Clearinghouse notified the City on October 2, 1992, that the Draft
had been circulated in accordance with the provisions of CEQA; and
WHY~REAS, the Draft EIR for the General Plan identified a number of significant
impacts relating to aesthetics, agricultural resources, air quality, biology, cultural resources,
education, fife services, geology and seismic hazards, land use, library, light and glare, noise,
open space, parks and recreation, police services, risk of upset, sewage treatment, solid waste,
transportation and circulation, and water resources; and
WHY, REA$, the Ell determined that a number of significant impacts could be mitigated
and reduced to a level of insignificance for the following: esthetics, cultural resources, fire
services, geology and seismic .hazards, land use, library, light and glare, open space, parks and
recreation, police services, risk of upset, sewage treatment, solid waste, and water resources;
and
WHY~REAS, the EIR determined that, even with the application of available mitigation
measures, the following could not be mitigated to a level of insignificance: air quality,
agricultural resources, biology, education, library, noise, and transportation and circulation; and
W1TEREAS, the Planing Commission has held duly noticed public hearings on October
19th, November 2nd, November 23rd and December 7th, 1992, and January 4th, 1993 to
consider the proposed General Plan and Environmental Impact Report; and
WH'EREAS, on January 4, 1993, the Planing Commission recommended to the City
Council that the Council ceitify the Environmental Impact Report and approve and adopt the
draft General Plan; and
WHRREM, the City provided a copy of the Response to Comments to all responsible
agencies on September 9, 1993 as provide in State law; and
WttEREAS, the City Council has held duly noticed public hearings on February 16th,
March 16th, April 6th, April 20th, May 18th, June 15th, August 17th, September 21st, October
12th, and October 261h 1993 to consider the proposed General Plan and Environmental Impact
Report and Statement of Overriding Considerations.
R:\SXGENPLAN~0PCCI0 10/18193 klb ~ 5
NOW, Ti:!E~X)RE, ~ CITY COUNCIL FOR ~ CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES ttEREBY RESOLVE AND DETERMII~E AS FOLLOWS:
Seaion 1. The City Council has reviewed the Environmental Impact Report prepared
for the City General Plan, has considered ~e information contained within it, and hereby
certifies that the Report has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act, as nmendcd.
Section 2. The City Council finds that to the extent that any impacts attributed to the
General Plan remain unmitigated, such impacts are acceptable in light of the overriding social,
economic and other considerations which will result from implementing the City General Plan.
As a result, the Council finds that the benefits of the General Plan outweigh the unmitigated
impacts which may result and hereby adopts a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the
following environmental impacts: agricultural resources, air quality, biologic resources,
education, library services, noise, transportation and circulation.
R:\S\GENPLAN~OPCCI0 10/15/93 klb ~ 6
Seerion 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFIb. r} this 26th day of October, 1993.
ATTEST:
SAt, mr oz
MAYOR
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SFAL]
STATE OF CALIFO~)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I B'EREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecuh at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 26th day of October,
1993 by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNTERS:
COUNCu-MEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
JUNE S. GI~I~aK
CITY CLERK
R:XS~GBNPLAI~GPCC10 10118/~ kib '[ 7
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
R:~S\GENPLAN~OPCCIO 10/18/93 IrJb '] 8
ATTACttMENT NO. 4
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING ~ MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
FOR ~ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT BgPORT FOR Tnr~ GENERAL
PLAN FOR ~ CITY OF TEMECULA.
WI~.REAS, Section 65300 of the Government Code requires that cities adopt a
comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the jurisdiction as well
as any adjacent areas which, in the judgement of the city, bears a relationship to its planning;
and
WHEREAS, Sections 65302 of the Government Code requires that a general plan
address the following issues: land use, circulation, housing, conservation of natural resources,
open space, noise, and public safety; and
VVH'EREAS, Sections 65303 of the Government Code ',allows the City to include any
other issu~ or concerns into the general plan which may relate to the physical development of
the City; and
~, the process of preparing the General Plan has included a number of
opportunities for public and 'citizen involvement included a number of town meetings, technical
committee meeting and public hearings, and by making numerous copies of the plan and
associated documents available to the public; and
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as mended (Sections
21000 through 21177 of the Public Resources Code), requires that prior to the approval of any
project the Lead Agency consider the putential impacts and effects of said project, consider
alternatives to the project, and identify mitigation measures necessary to reduce or eliminate the
impact of the project on the environment; and
WIfERIP. AS, the City of Temecula prepared an Initial Study for the General Plan and
determined that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) would be required for the General Plan
in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines prepared by the Office
of Planning and Research; and
WIIEREAS, the City of Temecula issued a Notice of Preparation on May 12, 1992; and
W!tER~&S, the a number of comments were received concerning the scope and content
of the EIR for the General Plan which were used to guide the preparation of the Draft EIR; and
WIlERE&S, the City of Temecula issued a Notice of Completion for the Draft BR on
August 12, 1992; and
R:\S\GENPLAN~OPCCI0 10/18/93 klb ~ 9
WHEREAS, the Draft EIR was available for public review and comment from August
14 through September 27, 1992; and
WHERE/kS, the State Clearinghouse notified the City on October 2, 1992, that the Draft
EIR had been circulated in accordance with the provisions of CEQA; and
~, the City received a number of letters with comments and concerns about
the content of the Draft EIR for the General Plan; and
VVI~j~,AS, the Draft EIR for the General Plan identified a number of significant
impacts relating to aesthetics, agricultural resources, air quality, biology, cultural resources,
education, fire services, geology and seismic hazards, land use, library, light and glare, noise,
open space, parks and recreation, police services, risk of upset, sewage treatment, solid waste,
transportation and circulation, and water resources; and
W~EREAS, the Draft InR identified a number of mitigation measures which reduced
these significant impacts to a level of insignificance for the following: aesthetics, cultural
resources, fife services, geology and seismic hazards, land use, library, light and glare, open
space, parks and recreation, police services, risk of upset, sewage treatment, solid waste, and
water resources; and
WHEREAS, the foliowing impacts, even with the application of available mitigation
measures, can not be mitigated to a level of insignificance: air quality, agricultural resources,
biology, education, library, noise, and transportation and circuhtion; and
WFIY, REAS, the Planing Commission has held duly noticed public hearings on October
19th, November 2nd, November 23rd and December 7th, 1992, and January 4th, 1993 to
consider the proposed General Plan and Environmental Impact Report; and
WHEREAS, on January 4, 1993, the Planing Commission recommended to the City
Council that the Council certify the Environmental Impact Report and approve and adopt the
draft General Plan; and
WnER!?,~,S, the City provided a copy of the Response to Comments to all responsible
agencies on September 9, 1993 as provide in State law; and
WIW~REAS, the City Council has held duly noticed public hearings on February 16th,
March 16th, April 6th, April 20th, May 18th, June 15th, August 17th, September 21st, October
12th, and October 26th 1993 to consider the proposed General Plan and Environmental Impact
Report and Statement of Overriding Considerations; and
WnE~REAS, the City Council Certified the EIR and adopted a Statement of Overriding
Consideration on October 26, 1993.
R:XS~GRNPLAN~OPCCI0 lO/lst193 ~ 20
NOW, THEREInORE, TH]?, CITY COUNCIL FOR THI?, CITY OF TEMECULA
FIY, R!~,Ry RF~OLVE AND DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program, as
amended, and directs Staff to implement the measures identified in the Program as needed to
mitigate and reduce the environmental impacts associated with and resulting from the City
General Plan.
Section 2. The City Clerk shrill certify. the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVRD AND ADOPTED this 26th day of October, 1993.
ATTEST:
J. SAL MU,OZ
MAYOR
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALTI~ORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF IEMECULA)
I H'/.RRRy CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecuia at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 26th day of October,
1993 by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCR,MEMBERS:
COUNCKMEMBERS:
TUNES. GREEK
CITY CI-~LK
R:\S\GF, NPLAN~GPCCI0 10118/93 klb 21
· ATTACHMENT NO. 5
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE GENERAL PLAN
R:\S\OENPI.,A~OPCCI0 10/18/93
ATrACttlVlENT NO. 5
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLIYTION OF THY. CITY COUNCIL FOR ~ CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING TFfE GENERAL PLAN FOR ~ CITY OF
TEME~.
WFr!~EAS, Section 65300 of the Government Code requires that cities adopt a
comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the jurisdiction as well
as any adjacent areas which, in the judgement of the city, bears a relationship to its planning;
and
WI~AS, Sections 65302 of the Government Code requires that a general plan
address the following issues: land use, circulation, housing, conservation of natural resources,
open space, noise, and public safety,
WttEREAS, Sections. 65303 of the Government Code allows the City to include any
other issues or concerns into the general plan which may relate to the physical development of
the City; and
~, the process of preparing the General Plan has included a number of
opportunities for public and citizen involvement included a number of town meetings, technical
committee meeting and public hearings, and by making numerous copies of the plan and
associated documents available to the public; and
WHEREAS, Section 65360 of the Government Code requires that all new Cities to adopt
a General Plan within 30 months of incorporation; and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula was incorporated on December 1, 1989; and
WFIEREAS, the Director of Planning and Research, in accordance with the provision
of Section 65361 of the Government Code, has extended the deadline for adoption of the General
Plan from May 1, 1992, to November 25, 1993; and
WItY~REAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as amended (Sections
21000 through 21177 of the Public Resources Code), requires that prior to the approval of any
project the Lead Agency consider the potential impacts and effects of said project, consider
alternatives to the project, and identify mitigation measures necessary to reduce or eliminate the
impact of the project on the"enviroament; and
WI~,lil~,AS, the City of Temecula has prepared an Environmental Impact Report for the
General Plan in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines prepared
by the Office of Planning and Research; and
R:~S\G!~iPLAN~OPCCI0 10/18/93 klb 23
WBEREAS, Section 65302 of the Government Code requires that the City of Temecula
submit a copy of its draft Safety Element to the Diyision of Mines and Geology (DMG) for their
review and comment; and
WVIERE~S, the City of Temecula submitted its draft Public Safety Element to the DMG
on August 26, 1992; and
WV~.RE~tS, the City of Temecuh has made changes W the draft Public Safety Element
in response to the concerns raised by DMG; and
W!~I!I~AS, Section 65585 of the Government Code requires that the City of Temecuh
submit a copy of its draft Housing Element to the California Department of Housing and
Conunity Development for their review and comment; and
WI~.iIEAS, the City of Temecuh submitted its draft Housing Element to the California
Department of Housing and Community Development (I-ICD) on May 18, 1992, January 20,
1993, and August 3, 1993; and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecuh has made changes to the draft Housing Element in
response to the concerns raised by HCD; and
WtIEREJ, S, the Planing Commission has held duly noticed public hearings on October
19th, November 2nd, November 23rd and December 7th, 1992, and January 4th, 1993 to
consider the proposed General Plan and Environmental Impact Report; and
WHEREAS, on January 4, 1993, the Planing Commission recommended to the City
Council that the Council approve and adopt the draft General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held duly noticed public hearings on February 16th,
March 16th, April 6th, April 20th, May 18th, June 15th, August 17th, September 21st, October
12th, and October 26th 1993 to consider the proposed General Plan and Enviwnmental Impact
Repon; and
WI:rF. REAS, the City Council Certified the EIR, adopted a Statement of Overriding
Consideration and Mitigation MoniWring Program for the EIR for the General Plan on October
26, 1993.
NOW, THEREFORE, ~ CITY COUNCIl, FOR ~ CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES FrEREBY RESOLVE AND DETER,MINE AS FOLLOWS:
Seaion 1. The City Council hereby approves and adopts the General Plan for the City
of Temecuh, as amended.
Seaion 2. The City Council hereby determines that until the new zoning ordinance
for the City of Temecuh is brought into conformance with the General Plan, development
decisions shall be based upon the General Plan land use designations and policies, and not the
R:~S\GENPLA~GPCCI0 10/18~9:~ klb 24
c- :ng zoning when these two documents are in conflict, in accordance with the consistency
:~ quirements of State Law.
Seerion 3. The City Council hereby directs Staff to submit a copy of the final General
Plan to the Riverside County Airport Land Use Cowmi.~sion for their review and comment on
airport related issues in accordance with the provisions of Section 21676 of the Public Utilities
Code.
Section 4. The City Clerk shah certify the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of October, 1993.
A'ITEST:
L SAL MU OZ
MAYOR
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CAIIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 26th day of October,
1993 by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILh,mMBERS:
COUNCH-MEMBERS:
COUNCH~MEMBERS:
JUNE S. GRRRK
CITY C!-~,K
R:\SXGENPLAN~GPCCI0 10/18/93 klb 25
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM FOR THE GENERAL PLAN
R:\S\GE!~'PLAN~GPCCI0 lO/18/~J ~lb 26
ATrACttMF2qT NO. 6
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR ~ CITY OF
TI2VlF_,CULA ADOPTING ~ IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM FOR
GENERAL PIAN FOR ~ CITY OF TEMECULA.
WI=IEREAS, Section 65300 of the Government Code requires that cities adopt a
comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the jurisdiction as well
as any adjacent areas which, in the judgement of the city, bears a relationship to its planning;
and
W!~-~, Sections 65302 of the Government Code requires that a general plan
address the following issues: land use, circulation, housing, conservation of natural resources,
open space, noise, and public safety; and
Wi~,~, Sections 65303 of the Government Code allows the City to include any
other issues or concerns into the general plan which may relate to the physical development of
the City; and
WHEREAS, the process of preparing the General Plan has included a number of
opportunities for public and citizen involvement included a number of town meetings, technical
committee meeting and public hearings, and by making numerous copies of the plan and
associated documents available to the public; and
WHEREAS, Section 65360 of the Government Code requires that all new Cities to adopt
a General Plan within 30 months of .incorporation; and
WItT~Rt&S, the City of Temecula was incorporated on December 1, 1989; and
WI~REAS, the Director of Planning and Research, in accordance with the provision
of Section 65361 of the Government Code, has extended the deadline for adoption of the General
Plan from May 1, 1992, to November 25, 1993; and
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as amended (Sections
21000 through 21177 of the Public Resources Code), requires that prior to the approval of any
project the Lead Agency consider the potential impacts and effects of said project, consider
alternatives to the project, and identify mitigation measures necessary to reduce or eliminate the
impact of the project on the-environment; and
Wlt'!~REAS, the City of Temecula has prepared an Environmental Impact Report for the
General Plan in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines prepared
by the Office of Planning and Research; and
R:\S\GENPLAN~OPCCI0 10/18/93 Idb 27
W~!~R~A_S, the Planing Commission has held duly noticed public hearings on October
19th, November 2nd, November 23rd and Dec.__~_mber 7th, 1992, and January 4th, 1993 to
consider the proposed General plan and Environmental Impact Report; and
WHEREAS, on January 4, 1993, the Planing Commission recommended to the City
Council that the Council approve and adopt the draft General Plan; and
WItEREA5, the City Council has held duly noticed public hearings on February 16th,
March 16th, April 6th, April 20th, May 18th, June 15th, August 17th, Septe4nber21st, October
12th, and October 26th 1993 to consider the proposed General Plan and Environmental Impact
Report; and
W!~-~, the City Council Certified the EIR, adopted a Statement of Overriding
Consideration and Mitigation Monitoring Program for the EIR for the General Plan on October
26, 1993; and
W!:~,~, on October 26, 1993, the City Council approved and adopted the draft
General Plan, as amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, ~ CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HERERy RESOLVE AND DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council hereby approves the Implementation Program to
implement the General Plan, as amended, for the City of Temecula and hereby directs staff to
begin to implement the implementation measures and actions identified in the Plan.
R:XS\GENPLANXOPCCI0 10/18/93 klb 28
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPRO~ AND ADOPTED this 26th day of October, 1993.
ATTEST:
SAL MU OZ
MAYOR
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I HYIIERy CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 26th day of October,
1993 by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
C OUNCILMEMBERS:
C OUN CII -MEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
/lINE S. GI~PPK
CITY CT.R"IK
R:\S\GENPLAN~GPCCI0 10/1S/93 klb 29
ITEM NO.
19
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
October 26, 1993
Proposed Skateboard Ordinance
Prepared By:
Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive Report and Provide Direction to Staff to Prepare a
· Skateboard Ordinance
BACKGROUND
The City Council has received several inquiries from citizens and business owners requesting
that the City adopt an ordinance regulating skateboard usage. City staff has reviewed other
cities' ordinances and has compiled the following alternatives for the Council to consider·
Private PrOPertY
Several business owners have requested that the City adopt an ordinance which would
prohibit skateboarding on private property. The Police Department is unable to prohibit such
activity in the absence of an ordinance. Such an ordinance could be written in one of the
following ways:
Prohibit all skateboarding on private property without the property owner's
consent. This would allow property owners, with no approval from the City,
to post their properties with signs-that would prohibit skateboarding.
Prohibit skateboarding on private property in those areas designated by
resolution of the Council. This would require property owners to petition the
Council to declare by resolution the prohibition of skateboarding for a particular
property. In shopping centers, some cities require the property owner to
petition the Council where other cities require a majority of the tenants to
petition the Council·
Streets and Sidewalks
Vehicle Code Section 467 allows skateboarding in a public street only in the absence of a
sidewalk. Vehicle Code Sections 21967 and 21969 authorize local authorities to adopt rules
and regulations prohibiting or restricting persons from riding or propelling skateboards or
engaging in roller skating on highways, sidewalks or roadways. Therefore, the Council may
choose to either prohibit skateboarding on public streets and/or public sidewalks entirely or
on a limited basis in the following manner:
1. Prohibit skateboarding on all public streets and/or public sidewalks;
Prohibit skateboarding on all public streets and/or public sidewalks except those
areas designated by resolution of the Council;
Permit skateboarding on all public streets and/or public sidewalks except those
areas designated by resolution of the Council;
It should be noted here that the Public Works Department feels that skateboards should be
prohibitedon all streets and sidewalks unless authorized by resolution of the Council while the
Sheriff's Department feels that skateboarding should be permitted on all public streets and
sidewalks except those areas designated by resolution by the Council.
The Community Services Commission, when discussing the potential skateboard park for the
Rancho California Sports Park, expressed a desire that skateboarding be allowed on sidewalks
and bike lanes. The Commission wanted these areas available to skateboarders to enable
them to travel to and from the proposed skate park.
Public Parks
On October 8, 1991, the City of Temecula adopted Ordinance No. 91-37, regulating uses in
public parks. Section 5.B.' of Ordinance No. 91-37 states: "No person shall ride or operate
a skateboard in any park, except in designated areas." The Council would need to make such
a designation for the area of the proposed skateboard park in the Rancho California Sports
Park.
If the City does construct the proposed skateboard park, Ordinance No. 91-37 would need
to be amended to comply with California Health and Safety Code Section 25906. Section
25906 requires local public agencies which own or operate a skateboard park to adopt an
ordinance requiring users to wear a helmet, elbow pads and knee pads. In addition, the City
Attorney recommends that the City obtain liability waivers from users of such facilities.
Staff 'has spoken with the City's insurance broker. The City would be able to obtain insurance
coverage for the skateboard park. The insurance broker has forwarded to the Director of
Community Services design suggestions that would limit the City's liability in the operation
of the facility.
Should the Council desire, both the declaration for the skateboard park and the amendment
to Ordinance No. 91-37 could be done in conjunction with this proposed Skateboard
Ordinance.
Fines
The Council must consider if the ordinance is to contain provisions for fines or other
punishments for violators of any of the above provisions of the ordinance.
R:~TAFFRPT~KAT!~ID.CC IO~ISN3 M~ 2
FISCAL IMPACT
If the City prohibits skateboarding on public ~70perty, public sidewalks, and certain-public
streets, the City would incur the cost of obtaining and posting the required signs. The
purchase and posting of a sign would cost the City approximately $125.00 per sign. Also,
if skateboarding is prohibited on private property, the ordinance will need to state whether the
City or the property owner is responsible for posting said property.
Attachments:
1. City Attorney's Letter Regarding Proposed Skateboard Ordinances - Page 4
R:~S\STAFFRPT~SKATEBRD.CC 10~1S~93 k~
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
CITY ATTORNEY'S LETTER REGARDING
PROPOSED SKATEBOARD ORDINANCES
SUITE I
¢605) S67-3468
TELEC0PlER: (805) 482-9834
LAW OFFICES
WZT~L~S & SO~NSEN
3200 BRISTOL STREET
SUITE 8,~C)
(714.) S4S-SSSg
FrACSINI II.,Ir (714) 755-5648
LOS ANGELES 0FF'ICE
61i WEST SIXTH STItEET, SUITE 2500
LOS ANGELES, CALIIrOIIINIA SOOl?
{213) 236-0600
TE~_EC0PlEFt: (213) 236-2700
February 17, 1993
RECEIVED
Mr. Gary Thornhill
Planning Director
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California. 92590
FEB 18 1993
Ans'd ............
Re: Skateboarding Ordinance For Temecula
Dear Gary:
This letter will discuss the results of our research on the
City of Temecula's authority to adopt an ordinance regulat-
ing/prohibiting skateboarding on public and/or private property.
STATE LAW
Vehicle Code Section 21113 (copy attached) provides in
pertinent part:
"(f) A public agency. . .may adopt rules or regulations to
restrict, or specify the conditions for, the use of bicy-
cles, motorized bicycles, skateboards, and roller skates on
public property under the jurisdiction of that agency."
Section 21113(b) requires that every legislative body "shall
erect or place appropriate signs giving notice of any special
conditions or regulations that are imposed under this
section. . ." In addition, Vehicle Code Sections 21967 and 21969
authorize local authorities to adopt rules and regulations
prohibiting or restricting persons from riding or propelling
skateboards or engaging in roller skating on highways, sidewalks,
or roadwavs.
Thus, there is express state law authorizing general law
cities to regulate/prohibit such activities on public property.
However, the Vehicle Code does not provide similar authority for
regulating skateboarding on private property. Therefore, the
Mr. Gary Thornhill
Planning Director
February 17, 1993
Page 2
.city will have to rely on its general police powers for authority
for such regulation.
Regarding Councilmember Stone's inquiry on having city-
operated skateboard parks without incurring liability, Health and
Safety Code Section 25906 (copy attached) mandates operators of
skateboard parks to require users of the park to wear a helmet,
elbow pads and knee pads. The statute was amended in 1992 to
address skateboard parks owned or operated by local public
agencies and provides the following:
"(b) With respect to any [skateboard park] owned or operat-
ed by a local public agency. . .that is not supervised on a
regular basis, the requirements of subdivision (a) may be
satisfied by compliance with the following:
(1) Adoption by the local public agency of an ordinance
requiring any person riding a skateboard at the facility to
wear a helmet, elbow pads, and knee pads.
(2) The posting of signs at the facility affording reason-
able notice that any person riding a skateboard in the
facility must wear a helmet, elbow pads, and knee pads, and
that any person failing to do so will be subject to citation
under the ordinance required by paragraph (1)."
The above amendments give cities the ability to meet the
law's requirements without having constant supervision of the
park.. However, it is not clear from the statute that compliance
with this law would completely immunize the city from all liabil-
ity for any injuries occurring in a city-operated skateboard
park.
Therefore, if the City of Temecula decides to designate
areas in any city parks for skateboarding, it is recommended that
the City Council adopt an ordinance in accordance with Health and
Safety Code Section 25906 discussed above. Furthermore, due to
the risk of injury which is greater than at a typical park, it is
also recommended that the City obtain liability waivers from
users of such facilities to hold the city harmless from any
liability for resulting injuries.
Mr. Gary Thornhill
Planning Director
February 17, 1993
Page 3
SAMPLE ORDINANCES
Enclosed for your information are copies of skateboarding
ordinances from the Cities of Dana Point and Mission Viejo. The
ordinances are very similar in that they both provide for prohib-
iting certain activities on both public and private property when
such property has been designated by resolution of the City
Council and posted as a restricted area. The Mission Viejo
ordinance includes prohibiting certain activities outside of a
designated area when such use creates a "nuisance."
The basic penalties for violations of both ordinances are
infractions punishable by a fine of Fifty Dollars ($50.00).
However, the Dana Point ordinance permits third and subsequent
violations to'be punishable as a misdemeanor.
We hope the foregoing information is useful to you. If you
have any questions or require additional information or would
like a similar ordinance drafted for the City of Temecula, please
contact us.
jery truly yours,
S~ J he~r
Enclosures
CC:
Shawn Nelson, Director
Community Services
Scott F. Field
City Attorney
TEM/1102298. LTR
ITEM 2O
I~PPROV~L
CITY ~TTORNEY
FIFANCE OFFICER
CITY Ie~d~AGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER
OCTOBER 26, 1993
TEMECULA MUSEUM
PREPARED BY: ~
RECOMMENDATION:
SHAWN D. NELSON, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR
That the Board of Directors:
Approve the modification and amendment of the City's land lease of Sam Hicks
Monument Park with the Old Town Temecula Historical Museum Foundation.
Appoint two members to serve on a Project Committee for the Sam Hicks
Monument Park Improvement Project.
Authorize City staff to set a public hearing and prepare the agreements
necessary to provide the Old Town Temecula Historical Museum Foundation
with $500,000 in Redevelopment funding to improve the existing church
facility and construct a new museum facility.
DISCUSSION: On October 2, 1990, the City Council approved a lease with
the Old Town Temecula Historical Museum Foundation for forty (40) years for $1.00
per year. The purpose of this lease was to allow the Museum Foundation to construct
a museum facility and renovate the old church on Sam Hicks Monument Park. The
approval of this lease was prior to the first meeting of the Community Services
Commission (formerly Parks and Recreation Commission) held on October 22, 1990.
The provisions of this lease include that the Museum Foundation construct a museum
facility of no less than 3,000 sq. ft and renovate the church facility in Sam Hicks
Monument Park. The design and location of the facility must be approved by the City.
Operation and maintenance of the museum and church will be the responsibility of the
Museum Foundation. Also, the lease stipulated that construction of the facilities
would begin at the park by January 1, 1994.
The Museum Foundation has requested that the City extend the construction provision
in the lease to allow the museum the ability to complete the first phase of the
museum facility by January 1, 1996. The City has allocated $500,000 in
Redevelopment Funds (RDA) for the development of a museum facility and $475,000
in RDA funds to improve Sam Hicks Monument Park. It is recommended that the
Museum Foundation and the City coordinate in master planning Sam Hicks MonUment
Park and allow the Museum Foundation to coordinate the construction of their
improvements. This will provide the integration of the Museum's improvement plans
with the overall design of the park.
On October 11, 1993, the Community Services Commission approved locating the
museum facility on Sam Hicks Monument Park and extending the construction
provision for the museum facility to January 1, 1996.
FISCAL IMPACT: Cost of improving the church facility and constructing the
museum and public restrooms is budgeted at $500,000. Cost of completing the park
improvements at Sam Hicks Monument Park is budgeted at $475,000. Monies have
been budgeted by the City Council in the City's Redevelopment Funds.
MODIFICATION AND AMENDMENT OF LAND LEASE
DATED JANUARY 1, 1991
THIS MODIFICATION AND AMENDMENT OF LAND LEASE is entered
into this 1st day of October, 1993, by and between the CITY OF
TEMECULA, hereinafter called "Lessor" and THE TEMECULA VALLEY
MUSEUM, a California non-profit public benefit corporation,
formerly known as THE OLD TOWN TEMECULA HISTORICAL MUSEUM
FOUNDATION, hereinafter called "Lessee".
WHEREAS, Lessee has obtained funding to construct a museum.
facility on the Property, and has submitted design concept plans
to Lessor for approval, and
WHEREAS, the Land Lease provides that construction of a
museum facility shall commence on or before January 1, 1994.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and
promises hereinafter mentioned, the parties, Lessor and Lessee,
agree to modify and .amended the Land Lease as follows:
5. USE OF THE PROPERTY. The Property shall be used for the
construction and operation of a museum of a minimum of 3,000
square feet, including public restrooms. Lessor agrees to
construct public restrooms for use by park visitors.
Construction of the museum structure shall commence within 6
months of design concept approval by Lessor and may be
constructed in phases. In addition, a final inspection or
certificate of occupancy of the first phase shall be obtained on
or before January 1, 1996. The Property shall also be used for
the relocation of a church of 1,200 square feet. Other
construction projects on the Property, not specifically permitted
by this Lease are prohibited, unless the written consent of
Lessor is first obtained. The design and location of museum
structures shall be subject to Lessor's approval, which approval
shall not be unreasonably withheld. Lessee also agrees to comply
with all applicable laws, rules, regulations, and ordinances of
every governmental body or agency whose authority extends to the
leased Property, or to the business conducted upon the leased
Property.
1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this
Modification and Amendment of Land Lease the day and year first
above written.
CITY OF TEMEC~LA,
A Municipal Corpora=ion
THE TEMEC~LAVALLEY MUSEUM,
a California Non-Profit
Public Benefit Corporation
By:
J. SALMUNOZ
Mayor
NANCY J. MADRICE
President
ATTEST:
By:
JUNE S. GREEK
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
SCOTT F. FIELD
City Attorney
LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY C. STEARNS, A.P.C.
By:
JEFFREY C. STEARNS
Museum Attorney
2
EXI::~MPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY
City of Temecula
Pursuant to Govt. Code § 6103
And when Recorded mail to:
City of Temecula
43172 Bu~ness Park Drive
' Temecula, Ca 92390
(Space above this line for Recordcr's use only)
THI,~ LEASE is entered into as of January 1, 1991, between the CITY OF
TEMECULA, hereinafter called 'Lessor,* and THE OLD TOWN EMECULA
HISTORICAL MUSEUM FOUNDATION, a California non-profit public benefit
corporation, hereinafter called "Lessee." Lessor accluired title in the name of the CITY OF
TEMECULA to the real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside,
State of California, described in Exhibit "A" , attached hereto, by deed dated
February 12, 199].
NOW, TnEREI~ORE, in consideration of covenatits and promises hereinafter
mentioned, the paxties, Lessor and Lessee, agree as follows:
1. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY. Lessor hereby leases to Lessee, and
Lessee here hires and takes from Lessor, the Property to be defined as that land to be
occupied by the museum as per the attached plot plan (Exhibit "A" attached hereto) located
on Moreno Road, Temecula, California, hereinafter called the "Property."
2. TERM. The term of this agreement shall be forty (40) years, commencing on
November 1, 1990, and ending on October 31, 2030.
This Lease may be extended as set forth in paragraph four (4) of this Agreement.
3. RENT. Lessee agrees to pay Lessor as rent for the use and occupancy of the
Property the sum of ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) per year, payable in advance on the first (lsO
day of January of each year commencing with January 1, 1991, and continuing thereafter
during Lessee's use and occupancy of the Property.
If the Lessee renews the term of this Lease as provided in paragraph four (4), the
Lease shall continue for the same rental rate.
Rent shall be payable in hwful money of the United States to Lessor at the address
stated herein or to such other persons or at such other places as Lessor may designate in
4. OPTION TO RENEW. As part of the consideration for the execution of this
· . Lease, Lessor hereby grants to Lessee, an option to extend and renew the provisions of this
Lease for a twenty-year tel'm, upon the same terms and conditions hereof. The option to
renew and extend the pwvisions of this Lease must be exercised, if at all, by notice in
writing given to Lessor not less than sixty (60) days prior to the expiration on the previous
5. USE OF THE PROPERTY. The Property shall be used for the consmlction
and operation of a museum of a minimum of 3,000 square feet, including public restrooms.
Construction of said structures shall commence within three (3) years of the date of this
Lease. In addition, a final inspection or certificate of occupancy shall be obtained within five
(5) years of the date of this Lease. The Property shall also be used for the relocation of a
church of 1,200 square feet. Other construction projects, not specifically permitted by this
Lease are prohibited. The design and location of said structures shall be subject to Lessor's
approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Lessee also agrees to comply
with all applicable laws, rules, regulations, and ordinances of every governmental body or
agency whose authority extends to the leased Property, or to the business conducted upon the
leased Property. _,
6. ALTERATIONS. Lessee may not make any alterations (other than
insubstantial ones) to the leased Property or structures thereon without Lessor'.s prior written
consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Lessee, at Lessee's own expense,
shall comply with all present and future governmental requirements arising out of, in
connection with, or necessitated by such alterations.
7. FIXTURES. All fixtures pTaced on the leased Property by Lessee shall at all
times be and remain the personal pwpeny of Lessee, and Lessee shall have the right to
remove such fixtures at any time during the term hereof and also within five (5) business
days after the termination of this Lease. Lessee shall, at Lessee's sole expense, resWre and
repair any damage to the leased Property caused or occasioned by the removal of the
fixtures. Such repair and restoration shall be performed within five (5') business days after
the expiration of this Lease and shall be performed in compliance with the terms and
conditions of Paragraph 8 of this Lease rehting to repairs.
2
8. REPAIRS. Lessee accepts the Property as being in good order, repair and
condition. At all times during the term of this Lease, Lessee shall, at Lessee's own cost and' '
expense, and at no cost and expense to Lessor,'-maintain the Property and all portions of the
Property in good order and repair and make all repain and replacements that may become
necessary to the Property, any buildings or improvements on the Property, or any sidewalks,
landscaping, driveways, or parking areas that are pan of, or appunenant to, the Leased
Property. Any and all repairs and replacements required by this provision, both ordinary and
extraordinary and both structural and nonstructural, shall be made promp~y by Lessee as
· required and shall comply with all applicable governmental laws, ordinances, and
regulations. Lessee hereby waives the provisions of sections 194 1 and 1942 of the California
~' Civil Code relating to Les~or's duty for tenantable premises and Lessee's right to make
repairs and deduct the expenses of such repairs from the rent.
9. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. Lessee shall recognize that the installation
and maintenance of landscaping on the Prope~ is an integral pan of the lease. Lessee shall
maintain and care for landscaping on the Property using generally accepted methods of
cultivation and watering. Lessee sb:dl maintain that standard of care necessary to prevent the
landscaping from deteriorating to the ~',xtent that its value as landscaping is destroyed. Lessee
shall also maintain landscape of Property in a manner and design reflecting the 1890 theme
of the TEMECULA HISTORICAL OVERLAY.
If Lessee fails to mainthin the landscaping in such proper condition, Lessor may give
written notice of such deficiency to Lessee. If the Lessor gives notice to Lessee of a
deficiency, Lessee shall have thirty (30) business days _within which to take reasonable steps
to cure the deficiency. If Lessee has not commenced corrective activity within such thirty
(30) days, the City may elect to take the steps necessary to insure that the landscaping is
maintained and cared for. At least fifteen (15) days prior to entering the Property to perfore
any such corrective work, Lessor shall either personally serve a notice of its intent to enter
the premises for this purpose on the Lessee or mail a copy of such notice by certified mail to
the Lessee's last known address, or as shown on the tax wlis. Lessor may enter the Property
to perform such corrective work as it reasonably considers necessary and pwper to return the
landscaping to its proper condition. Lessor may act either through its own employees or
through an independent contracWr to perform such corrective work.
If Lessor incurs costs, including administrative costs and atWmey's fees in returning
the landscaping to its proper condition pursuant to the procedure set forth in paragraph 7
above, Lessor may make a demand upon Lessee for payment of such costs as are reasonable
under the circumstances. If Lessee fails to pay such costs within thirty (30) business days
after the date demand is made, the terms and provisions of this lease shall terminate.
3
10. MECHANICS' t.IENS. Lessee hereby agrees to keep the leased Properly
and the improvements thereon or hereafter erected or placed thereon, and every part thereof,
and every estate, right, rifle, and interest therelnT, or in or to any part thereof, at all rimes
during the term of this Lease, free and clear of mechanics' liens and other liens for labor,
service, supplies, equipment, or materials. Lessee also agrees to fully pay and discharge and
wholly protect and save harmless Lessor and all and every part of the estate, right, rifle, and
interest of Lessor in and to all and every part of said demised Property and improvements
against any and all demands or claims that may or could ripen into such liens or labor
claims. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lessee may, if Lessee furnishes Lessor with a bond
or other security against loss or liability by reason thereof in a form acceptable to Lessor,
contest, at Lessee's sole cdst and expense, any such liens or claims and litigate the same final
judgment; in the event Lessee shall have taken an appeal from an adverse judgment, Lessor
shall at all rimes during the pendency of such appeal prevent the execution of such judgment
pending appeal.
11. DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY. Should any building or improvements on
the leased Property be damaged or destroyed by fire, the elements, Acts of God, or other
causes not the fault of Lessee or any person in or about the leased Property with the express
or implied consent of Lessee,' they shall be repaired or replaced by Lessee at its own cost
and expense; however, should the cost of repairing or restoring any buildings or
improvements so damaged or destwyed exceed fifty pax~t(50%) of the replacement cost of
all buildings and improvements to be located on the leased Property, Lessee may, at its
option, either repair and restore the damaged buildings and improvements or cancel this
Lease.
12. --. SURRENDER OF PROPERTY. On expiration or sooner termination of this
Lease, or any extensions or renewal of this Lease, Lessee shall pwmptly surrender and
deliver said Property to Lessor in as good condition as it is now at the date of this Lease,
reasonable wear and tear and repairs hereafter required to be made by Lessor excepted.
Lessee may surrender the property leaving the buildings relocated or constructed pursuant to
this Lease in place with the consent of Lessor and at no cost to Lessor. This paragraph is
subject to the conditions of Paragraph 7 relating to removal of fixtures. On file with the City
Clerk .of the City of Temecuh are photographs of the property in its condition as of the date
of execution of this Lease.
13. ,s,I,w-NABU~ITY OF PROPERTY. Nothing in this Lease shall be construed
to restrict the alienability of said Property. Lessor retains the right to sell or encumber said
Property at any time during the term of this Lease.
14. UTi~TIES. Lessee agrees to pay for all utilities, including telephone, water,
gas, electricity, and any and all other services which may be used in or upon the leased
Property during the term of this Lease without liability of Lessor. For each service, Lessee
shall pay the cost for the use of the service directly to the utility provider prior to the time
that the charge becomes delinquent.
4
15. TAXES. During the ten of this Lease, Lessee shall pay before delinquency
(1) all taxes, assessments, license fees, and any'Sther charges of any type whatsoever that are
levied, assessed, charged, or imposed on or against Lessee's possessory interest and/or
personal property installed or located in or on the leased Property and that become payable
during the term of this lease and C2) all real property taxes and general and special
assessments levied and assessed against the leased Property.
16. WASTE OR NUISANCE. Lessee sbnll not commit or permit the commission
by omen of any waste on ~aid Property, including graffiti; Lessee shall not maintain,
commit, or permit the maintenance or commission of any nuisance as defined in Section
3479 of the California Civil Code on said Property; and Lessee shall not use or permit the
use of said Property for any unlawful purpose.
17. ASSIG~ AND ST, JBLETII~G. Lessee may assign this Lease or an
interest merein and may also sublet the Property, provided Lessee first obtains the written
consent of Lessor to any such assignment or subletting. If, during the term of this Lease,
Lessee requests the written consent of Lessor to any assignment or subletling, Lessor's
consent shall not unreasonably be withheld. A consent to one assignment or subletting, and
any subsequent assignment or subletting without Landiord's consent shall be void and shall,
at Landlord's option, terminate this Lease. Any appwved assignment or sublease shall not
relieve Lessor of liability under the terms of this Lease.
18. INDEMNITY AND INSURANCE. Lessee agrees to indemnify and hold
Lessor harmless from and against any and all claims arising from any act, omission or
negligence of Lessee, or its contracWn, licensees, agents, servants, or employees, or arising
from any accident, injury or damage whatsoever caused to any person or property occurring
in, on, or about the Property, the sidewalks adjoining the Property, and from and against all
costs, expenses and liabilities incurred in or in connection with any such claim or proceeding
brought mereon, including, but not limited to, court costs and reasonable attomey's fees.
Lessee shall maintain in full force during the term of this Lease, a policy or policies
of general liability insurance in the minimum mount for the first year of the term of this
Lease of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand D~liars ($250,000.00) combined single-limit per
occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Upon the final inspection
for certificate of occupancy for the Museum described at Section 5 of this Lease, the mount
of said insurance shall increase to One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00). Lessee shall name
Lessor as an additional insured on such policies. Lessee shall furnish Lessor with a
Certificate of Insurance with respect to such policy or policies prior to entry on the property.
The policies shall further be endorsed with a 'broad form' endorsement so as to provide
comprehensive general liability insurance for the joint benefit of lessor and lessee for
personal injuries.
5
Lessee shall maintain in force, at Lessee's expense, a policy or policies of insurance
protecting against the following:
(1) Fire and other pealIs normally included in the extended coverage insurance with
special form, to the extent of at least one-hundred percent (100%) of the insurable
value of the building(s) and other improvements placed on the property pursuant to
the Lease, exclusive Of trade fixtures and equipment belonging to Lessee.
Fire and extended coverage insurance with respect to Lessee's fixtures and
equipment located on the property with vandalism and malicious mischief
endorsements to 'the extent of one-hundred percent (100%) of their insurable value.
During the term of this Luse, the proceeds of any such policy or policies for fire
insurance should be used solely for the repair or replacement of the fixtures or
equipment so insured.
(3)
Lessee shall funfish Lessor with a Certificate of Insurance with respect to all
policy or policies required pursuant to this Lease prior to entry on the property,
and occupancy of any buil.d~ngs constructed or re, located onto the property. If any
such insurance required in this Lease has a deductible chuse, the deductible
amount shall not exceed $1,000.00 per occurrence, and Lessee shall be liable for
any such deductible amount.
(4) The coverage mounts for all insurance requirements pursuant to the City shall
increase annually at a ram equal to the Consumer Price Index for Riverside
County.
19. INSPECTION. Lessor may enter upon the Property at any reasonable time
for the purpose of inspecting the Property. *Reasonable time* shall be defined as during
normal operating hours.
20. INSOLVENCY. The insolvency of Lessee as evidenced by a receiver
being appointed to take possession of all or substantially all of the property of Lessee, or the
making of a general assignment for the benefit of creditors by Lessee, shall terminate the
Lease and entitle Lessor to renter and regain possession of leased Property.
21. UNLAWFUL DETAINI~. In the evcnt of any breach of this Lease by
Lessee, Lessor, in addition to any other rights or remedies it may have, may give Lessee a
three-day notice to cure the breach or quit the premises. If Lessee fails to do either, Lessor
may bring a starewry proceeding in unlawful detainer to regain possession of the Property.
Any notice given by the Lessor pursuant to this paragraph does not constitute marion of
this Lease unless expressly so declared by Lessor in the notice.
22. WAIVER OF BREACH. The waiver by Lessor of any breach of any
term, covenant, or condition herein contained shall not be deemed to be a waiver of such
6
134995
term, covenant, or condition, or any subsequent breach of the same or any other term,
covenant, or condition herein contained, The subsequent acceptance of rent hereunder by
Lessor shall not be deemed to be a waiver of a~'prior occurring breach by Lessee of any
term, covenant, or condition of this Lease, other than the failure of Lessee to pay the
particular rental so accepted, regardless of Lessor's knowledge of such prior existing breach
at the time of acceptance of such rent.
23. ABANDONMENT. In the event that Lessee shall be absent from the
demised Property for a period of 30 days after default in payment of rent or other obligations
imposed on Lessee by this Lease, such absence shall be deemed to constitute an abandonment
of Lessee's interest in the ~lemised Property and an abandonment by Lessee of any personal
property lcft on the demised Property, and Lessor my thereupon reenter the Property as
hcreinbefore provided.
24. BINDING ON SUCCESSORS. The provisions of this Lease shall be
binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns and legal
representatives of the parties hereto. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed as a
consent by Lessor to any assignment Of this Lease or any interest therein by Lessee except as
provided in Paragraph 18 of this Lease.
25. NOTICES AND PAYIV~-NTS. Whenever notices and payments are
required to be given pursuant to the provisions of this Lease, they shall be sent to either
party, in writing and postage prepaid by registered mail, addressed as follows:
To the Lessor at:
City of Temecula
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
To the Lessee at:
The Old Town Temecula Historical Museum
Foundation, A California Non-Profit Public
Benefit Corporation
P.O. Box 792
Temecula, CA 92390
Either party may change such address by written notice by registered mail to the. other party.
26. DEFAULT, NOTICE OF DEFAULT, BREACH. A default in the
performance of any promise of, or of any obligation imposed upon Lessor and Lessee, shall
not constitute a breach of this Lease unless the party in default fails to cure such default
within thirty (30) days after the written notice of default has been served, except that failure
to cure a default in the payment of rent shall constitute a breach of this Lease if such default
is not cured within five (5) days after written notice of default has been served. If either
7
134995
party breaches this Lease, the other party shall be entitled to pursue every legal and equitable
remedy available, including (but not limited to) the right to ternfinate this Lease and the right
to recover accrued rent, paid in advance. Lessor;', 'in addition to other remedies it may have,
shall have the immediate right to teentry, and may remove all persons and property from the
Pwpe~, such property may be stored at the cost of Lessee. The prevailing .party shall be
reimbursed attorney's fees.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Lease the day and year
first above written.
LESSOR:
CITY OF TEMECULA,
A Municipal Corporation
THE .OLD TOWN TEMECULA
I:HSTORICAL MUSEUM FOUNDATION
a California Non-Profit Public Benefit
Corporation
By:
RONALD J. PARKS
Mayor
ATTEST:
'/~4ES. GRF~F~K
City Clerk
APPORVED AS TO FORM:
By: ~~/~
SCOTT F. FIELD
City Attorney
~rATE OF CALIFORNIA
134995
COUNTY OF RIVER$1DE
~n April 9, 1991 befor~ tne, the undersigned, A ,Notary Public in and for the S~_,_e of California,
personally appeared Becca Nakaya ,personally known to me
(or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the
within instrument and acknowledged to me that i~/she/they executed tl~ san~ in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of
which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. ~' * - - - x ......
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
RNEI~I:)E COUNTY
My Co,,=,,: ~n Expires
November 18, 1994
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTy OF mYERSroE 134995
On 4-9-91 before me, the undersigned, A Notary Public in and for the State of California,
personally appeared Ronald a. Parks, June S. Greek & SCott F. Fiel,~k, rsonally known to me
(or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the
within instrument and acknowled2ed to me ekst he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized
~ ~acity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of
Ach the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my haad a~'d official sesl.
Signatu~b,..k,..~ ~. ~
........ Nnvc,.~,wr In. 1994
134995
EXHIBIT
In The City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows:
That portion of Lot 6, and'of the unnamed road in Block 2, as shown by Map of
Subdivision of the Pauba Land and Water Company, in the County of Riverside, STate
of California, as shown by Map on file in Book 11, Page 507 of Maps, Records of San
Diego County, California, described as follows:
Beginning at the most westerly corner of Lot 32, Block 1, of The Town of Temecula
as shown by Map on file in Book 15, Page 726 of Maps, Records of San Diego
County, California; thence South 44 degrees 25'05" West, along The Northwesterly
boundary of said Town of Temecula, a distance of 141.45 feet To a point on the
Northerly right of way line of an unnamed road (60 feet wide) as described in
dedication and easement deed to the County of Riverside by deed recorded April 22,
1969 as Instrument No. 39504 of Official Records of Riverside County, California;
Thence Westerly continuing along said Northerly line being The arc of a Tangent curve
concave Northerly and having a radius of 375.78 feet Through a central angle of 19
degrees 01'17", a distance of 124.75 feet; thence North 17 degrees 08'42" EasT~
along The Easterly line of said unnamed road a distance of 290.87 feet; thence South
45 degrees 02'38" East, a distance of 271.16 feet to the point of beginning.
ITEM
NO.
21
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER ..~
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
October 26, 1993
Discussion of Planning Procedures and Public Notice Requirements
RECOMMENDATION:
Provide direction to Staff.
BACKGROUND
As a result of the City Council's concerns relating to the Planning Commission approval of an
Arco Mini-Mart/Gas Station recently, the Council directed staff to place this matter on this
agenda for discussion and direction to staff. The matter has been scheduled for two prior
Council meetings, but, because of heavy agendas, continued at the request of the Council.
DISCUSSION
One of the main issues of concern as it relates to this matter is that the Council believed that
it did not have an opportunity to consider the project approved by the Planning Commission.
It was their feeling that, because of the type of project and the proposed location of it, that
the matter should have come before them for review. Moreover, the Council also believed
that members of the public should have had the opportunity to express their concerns over
the project at the Council level.
Therefore, in order to better address the approval and appeal process for development
proposals, this matter is before the Council for input and direction to staff relative to any
changes in procedures and public notice requirements which might be necessary to prevent
situations like this from occurring again.
To this end, Staff has given careful consideration to the matter, and it is our opinion that the
best course of action for the City is the following:
Review those issues which may cause concern on the part of the Council and require
a higher level of review and public notice for these projects. Staff has reviewed the
zoning ordinance and developed a list of conditionally permitted uses (attached) which
may warrant special consideration.
Improve the current appeal procedure on all projects by providing action agendas
(recently implemented) on all Planning Commission actions.
R:~S\STAFFRFI~PECIAL.CC 10/20/93 klb 1
3. Improve public noticing on projects of special concern by:
as
Enhancing the visibility of the current notice of public hearing signs posted on
site. Staff has already contacted the sign manufacturers and they will be
producing a new prototype sign shortly which will be much more readable at
distances (pursuant to Mayor Mu~oz's suggestion).
b. Increasing the notice radius from the current 600 foot standard to 1,000 feet.
C
Increasing the size of the legal notice in the newspaper, so that notices are
more effective.
FISCAL IMPACT
None
Attachments:
1. City Council Report - Uses Requiring Conditional Use Permit Approval,
September 28, 1993 - Page 3
R:\S'~I'APPRPT~SPECIAL.CC 10/18/93 kro ~
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
CITY COUNCIL REPORT - USES REQUIRING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL
SEPTEMBER 28, 1993
R:\S\STAR;RPT~SPECIAL.CC 10/18/93 klb :~
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO'
FROM:
DATE
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
September 28, 1993
Uses Requiring Conditional Use Permit Approval
RECOMMENDATION:
BACKGROUND
At the September 14, 1993 City Council meeting, staff was directed to bring back to the
Council a listing of the types of uses that require approval of a conditional use permit.
Currently, all conditional use permits are approved by the Planning Commission.
Ordinance 348 requires conditional use permit approval for a number of different uses in all
zones (Reference Attachment 1__. Following is a listing of some of the various kinds of uses
that require conditional use permit approval:
Airports
Auto Wrecking Yards
Cemetaries
Bars and Cocktail Lounges
Billiard and Pool Halls
Hardware Stores
Liquor Stores
Mobilehome Parks
Congregate Care Facilities
Kennels and Catteries
Riding Academies
Body and Fender Shops
Swap Meets
Lumber Yards
Heliports
Car Washes
Truck Sales and Service
Meat Packing Plants
Concrete Batch Plants
Drive In Theaters
Hog Ranches
RV Storage Parks
S\STAFFRPT~FORM-1
In addition to Ordinance 348, the City has adopted a number of Ordinances requiring
conditional use permits for antennas, nightclubs, teen clubs, dance halls, billiard halls, and
adult businesses.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
Attachments:
Attachment No. 1 - Ordinance 348 Zones Specifying Uses Which
Require Conditional Use Permit Approval
vgw
S~ST~ 1 2
ITEM N O. 2 2
CITY ITTORNE~ '
FINI~NCI OFFICER
CITY NANi~ER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
City Clerk
October 26, 1993
Public/Traffic Safety Commission Ordinance Amendment
RECOMMENDATION: Introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING CHAPTER 12.01 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING
TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY
COMMISSION
BACKGROUND: In October of 1992, the City Council combined two existing
commissions, the Public Safety Commission and the Traffic and Transportation Commission.
As a result of this consolidation, the Council adopted ordinance No. 92-17 which established
the PUblic/Traffic Safety Commission and established the composition of the commission at
seven (7) members.
During the ensuing year, one member of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission resigned and
one member expired. As a result of this natural attrition, the sub-committee of the City
Council designated to review appointments has recommended that the number of members
be reduced to five to correspond with the size of the other City commissions. The City
Council appointed two members to fill expiring terms at the meeting of October 12, 1993 and
directed staff to prepare an ordinance to accomplish this change.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: Amended Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO. 93--
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AIVfF-NDING CHAPTER 12.01 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMI~NT OF A
TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMFfULA DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Chapter 12.01 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended
to read as follows:
"12.01.010 Public/Traffic Safety Commission F-~tablished. Pursuant
to Section 2.06.010 of this Code, there is hereby created an advisory commission to the City
Council which shall be known as the "Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission."
12.01.020 Commission Composition and Membership. The Pub-
lie/Traffic Safety Commission shall consist of ~cven (7) ~.~ Members appointed by the
City Council pursuant to Section 2.06.050 of this Code. No officers or employees of the
City or person under an employment contract subject to the jurisdiction of the City Council
shall be members of such Commission.
12.01.030 Term of Office. Terms of office for Public/Traffic Safety
Commissioners shall be three (3) years with staggered terms. Initially, all seven (7) ~
members may be selected at once. In order to achieve staggered tens, ~ ~ member
shall be appointed for a term of three (3) years; two members for tens of two (2) years; and
two members for terms of one (1) year, said terms to be determined by the drawing of lots.
At the completion of any term, a Commission member may be reappointed pursuant to the
procedures set forth in Section 2.06.050 of this Code.
12.01.040 Staff Assistance.- The City Manager shall ensure that
adequate staff will be allocated to provide necessary technical and clerical assistance to the
Commission.
12.01.050 Time and Place of Meeting. The Public/Traffic Safety
Commission shall establish a regular date, time, and place for Commission meetings, which
shall be open to the public. Said meetings shall occur no less frequently than once a month.
12.01.060 Duties. The Public/Traffic Safety Commission shall advise
the City Council on all matters subject to the jurisdiction of the Council pertaining to the
public and traffic safety. The duties of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission shall be
established by Resolution of the City Council. __
12.01.070 Public Hearings. Whenever the Commission determines, by
a two-thirds (2/3's) majority of those Members present, that its deliberations with respect to
a particular matter or matters would be substantially aided by the presentation of testimony
from the citizens of the City, or of a certain area of the City, the Commission may direct a
public hearing be held concerning such matter or matters. Notice of such a hearing shall be
provided by publication in a new~aper of general circulation published in the City of
Temecula, and/or by posting the same in at least three (3) public places, not later than seven
(?) days prior to the date of the hearing. Such hearings shall be conducted in accordance
with the rules established for the conduct of hearings before the City Council unless the
Council, by Resolution, shall otherwise provide. '
Section 2. Chapter 11.01 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby
Section 3. SEVERABILITY. The City Council hereby declares that the
provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent
jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid,
such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days
after its passage.
Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
1993.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this__
day of
ATTEST:
J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
SS
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temeeula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 93- was duly introduced and placed upon it first reading at
a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 1993, and that thereaf-
ter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on
the day of , 1993, by the following roll call vote.
AYES:
NOF_,S:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
OrdealS4 3
ITEM NO.
23
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
City Manager
October 26, 1993
Old Town Temecula Merchants Association Request for Funding
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider · request from the Old Town
Temecula Merchants Association to fund $24,000.00 to cover advertising on billboard which
promotes Old Town.
BACKGROUND: At the meeting of September 28, 1993, the City Council was approached
by members from the Old Town Temecula Merchants Association requesting funding in the
amount of $24,000 to extend a billboard message, which advertises the Old Town area, for
twelve (12) months.
The area identified as Old Town Temecula contains a diverse mix of businesses that include
retail shops, restaurants, a Western bar and dancing establishment, professional offices, a
museum and other service oriented businesses. The Old Town area generates approximately
$48,000.00 in sales tax per year. These numbers are derived from the audit reports of our
sales tax done by Hinderliter, deLlamas and Associates. Attached you will find e copy of a
letter presented to the Council on September 28, 1993 during the public comments portion
of the meeting. Pursuant to the provisions of the Brown Act, the Council could not act upon
this matter at that meeting, therefore it is appearing on your agenda for action this date.
DFD:jsg
R:~aeda.m6OTreA~e. 1
The merchants of Old Town are still in the recover stages of the flood
of January 16, 1993. To counteract the effects of this devastating disaster
and the subsequent economic stagnation'due to the negative image of Old
Town portrayed by news media, the Old Town Temecula Merchants
Associalion acled quickly to combal Ihe loss of business and income in Old
Town.
The Board acted quickly on several fronts, tirst it stagec!:a flood
~victim's benefit auction, held on February 20, 1993. Money.s collected
went to the individual businesses, and it was a ~ource of much needed
immediate cash to the business who sold merchandise. Proc. eeds received
from the Rod Run, held late Feb., helped to fund additional ad campaigns
to try to stimulate business. The association expended half the cost of the
centerfold two page ad on Old Town in the Chambers Visitors guide
currently in rack service in the amount of $3,8.50.00
Among many promotional activities, OTTMA formed a billboard
committee and raised $14,000.00 to leasea freeway sign for six months to
promote Old Town. About 90% of the merchants in Old Town
participated, and others such as Lou Cashmere, 'owner of Texaco Service
Station and Wells Fargo Bank helped substantially. ..
It is widely felt that in Old Town this billboard contributed to the
financial recovery now being experienced by our local merchants.
The billboard lease will expire shorlly. The Old Town Merchants dug
deep into their pockels to pay for the first six months rental; they are
financially unable to pull more money from their pocket an additional
time.
According to City records, $25,000,000.00 per year is generated from
retail sales in Old Town. Not to mention other commerce in Temecula
· stimulated by people coming to Old Town. The tax contribution to our
· city from sales in Old Town is approximately $250,000.00 annually.
",~ !': According to Cal-Trans, our sign is subject to being .viewed by 60,000
people per day. There is one major problem with it in that it is not
i illuminated at night. OMG has agreed to light the sign after dark
providing OT'fMA signs a contract for an additional year. '
This sign leases for $2,000.00 per month.
At this time we request a grant from the City of Temecula for
$24,000.00 to extend our lease for an additional twelve months.
Sincerely,
Old Town Merchants Association
ITEM NO.
24
ITEM NO.
25
DEPARTMENTAL
'REPORTS
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER ~
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Gary Thornhill, Director of Plannir~
October 26, 1993
Monthly Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and File
Discussion:
The following is a summary of the Planning Department's
caseload and project activity for the month of September 1993:
Caseload Activity:
The department received 4 applications for administrative cases and 8 public hearing
cases for the month of September. The following is a breakdown of case type for
public hearing items:
Annexation Fees
Change of Zone
Development Agreement
EIR (Sponsor Prepares)
General Plan Amendment
Minor Public Use Permit
Specific Plan (Land Use)
Second Unit Permit
Ongoing Projects:
General Plan: To date, the Council has reached a consensus on all the
elements. The remaining clean-up items and the Environmental Impact Report
and Mitigation Monitoring Program are scheduled to be discussed at the
October 26th City Council meeting.
Old Town Specific Plan: Staff continues working with the Old Town Merchants
Association and the Temecula Town Association to set up a Main Street
organization for Old Town. The proposed implementation program and the Plan
will be scheduled for City Council review upon completion of the General Plan.
R:%S~MONTHLY.RPT~1993~,SEPT.93 10119/93 vgw 1
Develoomem Code: A draft code is being reviewed by the Development Code
Advisory Committee, The committee has met three times and will meet again
on October 28th.
French Valley AirDort: The CoLtory has received a gram from the Federal
Aviation Administration, to prepare the Airport Facility Master Plan for French
Valley Airport. The comprehensive Land Use Plan and Master Plan will be
developed concurrently. The City has provided comments to the consultant on
Phase I of the Draft Master Plan.
Temecula Reoional Center Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report: This
Specific Plan was presented at a Planning Commission Workshop on May 4,
1992. The Commissioners gave direction to the applicant and staff. This
Specific Plan went to a DRC meeting January 5, 1993. Staff is awaiting
submittal of additional information. Environmental Impact Report 340 prepared
for the Temecula Regional Center was approved by the Planning Commission
on June 21, 1993 and certified by the City Council on July 13, 1993.
Winchester Hills and CamDos Verdes Soecific Plans and Environmental Impact
Reports: These Specific Plans were discussed at a Planning Commission
Workshop on May 4, 1992. The Commissioners gave direction to the applicant
and staff. The Notice of Completion for the Campos Verdes EIR went to State
Clearinghouse' July 10, 1992. Both of these Specific Plans went to the DRC
meetings on January 5, 1993. Staff is awaiting submittal of additional
information.
Murdv Ranch Soecific Plan and Environmental Imoact Reoort: This Specific
Plan was presented to the Planning Commission at a Workshop on April 6,
1992. The Commission provided Staff and the applicant direction relative to
design issues. The applicant has incorporated these changes into the Specific
Plan. This Specific Plan will be scheduled for a Planning Commission meeting
upon completion of the Development Agreement and the Congestion
Management Plan.
Johnson Ranch Specific Plan: The Specific Plan has been submitted and is
currently being reviewed by staff.
Attachment:
1. Count & Valuation Summary by Type - page 3
2. Revenue and Status Report - page 4
R:~S\MONTHLY.RPT~191!3~SEFT.93 10119/93 vgw 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
COUNT AND VALUATION SUMMARY BY TYPE
JULY 1993
R:\S~MONTHLY.RFT~1993~SEPT.93 10119/93 vow 3
REPT155
10/19/93 12:12
COUNT & VALUATION SUMMARY BY TYPE
Subtotal: Cnstr Type PLANNING APP
Date Range i 09/01/93 Thru 09/30/93 PLANNING APPLICATION Date Type:
~es (Select):PLAN
A/~/D Type Construction type Count Sq Feet
A PLANNING CASE-6/9/93
ANNEXATION FEES
CERT OF COMPL/WAIVE FPM
CHANGE OF ZONE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
EIR (SPONSOR PREPARES)
EXTENSION OF TIME-PAR MP
GEN PLN AMND-W/SPEC PLN
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
MINOR EVENT - NON PROFIT
MINOR PUBLIC USE PERMIT
SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE
SECOND UNIT PERMIT
i 0
i 0
I 0
i 0
i 0
i 0
I 0
i 0
i 0
I 0
i 0
I 0
12 0
TOTAL ** 12 0
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
REVENUE STATUS REPORT
R:\S\MONTHLY.RP'I'%1993~SEFF.93 10119/93 vgw 4
R EVPR I N2
10/04/93
161
ACCOUNT #
~101
~102
~103
4104
4105
4106
4107
~108
4109
~110
~111
~112
4113
4114
4115
4116
4117
4118
4119
4120
4121
412~
4125
4126
4127
4128
4129
4GO
41~1
4132
4133
4135
4136
4137
4138
413~
4140
4141
4142' ,
4143
4145
4146
10:26:35
CtNERAL FUND
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION
AHENDED fiNAL NAP
APPEALS
CERT. OF LAND DIV. COI4PLIANCE
EXTENSION OF T]HE
SINGLE FAHILY TRACTS
NULTI-FANILY TRACTS
PARCEL NAPS
LOT LINE ADJUSTlENT
NlNOll CHANGE
PARCEL NERGER (2-4 LOTS)
RECORDABLE ~__ml~_IVlSiON NAPS
REVERSION TO ACREAGE (5+LOTS)
SPECIAL SERVICE LETTER
SECOND tINIT PERHITS
CHANGE OF ZONE
CONDITIONAL USE PERHIT
CONSISTENCY CHECKS
GENERAL PLAN AHENIN4ENT
PLOT PLAN
PUBLIC U$E PERNIT
REVISED PERNIT
SETBACK ADJUSTIqENT
SPECIFIC PLAN
SUBSTANTIAL CONFORHANCE
TEI4ORARY OUTDOOR EVENT
TENPONARY USE PERNIT
VAR ] AN CE
ZONING INFORNATIOH LETTER
CEQA (INITIAL STUDIES)
CEQA ENVIROI4ENT INPACT REPORT
DEVELOPHENT AGREENENT
GEOLOGY CEQA
GEOLOGY ORD, 547 APZ
LAFCO
PARCEL NAP/MAIVER
NERGER
ANENDED FINAL TRACT/PAR, NAP
CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
CONDO TRACT NAP
REVERSION TO ACREAGE
LOT REVISZOR AFTER CHECK
LOT LINE ADJUST. PLAN CHECK
CERT, OF CORRECT, PLAN CHECK
CERT, OF CONPLIANCE PLAN CHECK
COND, CERT, OF COHPL, PLN.
CERT, OF PAR, NERGER PLAN CK
CITY OF TBECULA
REVENUE STATUS REPORT
SEPTENBER 1993
ADJUSTED
ESTINATE
.00
.00
.00
.00
.OO
.00
.00
.00
.OO
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.OO
.00
.00
.O0
150,000.00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
SEPTBIER
REVEINE
.00
.00
400.00
.O0
.00
.00
.00
2~0.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
260.00
.OO
590.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
15.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
4,200.00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
.00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
.00
,00
.00
1993-W,
REVENUE
.00
~50,00
2,225.00
18,~.00
.00
1,205.00
1,810.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
2,74~.00
.00
.00
2°629°00
.00
273.00
500.00
.00
1,2~8.00
15.00
.00
511.00
18.00
3,90~.00
4,200.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
..00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
PAGE
18,4~00-
.00
1,205.00-
1,810.00-
.00
.00
.00
.00
2~).00-
2,74~.00-
8,805.00-
.00
.00
147,371.00
.00
273.00-
500.00-
.00
1,2M.00-
15.00-
.00
571.00-
18.00-
4,200.00-
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00..
.00
.00
.00
ZCiX.
1.8
REVPR I N2
10106193
001
161
ACCOUNT #
4167
4150
4151
6153
4154
6155
4157
4169
6180
4200
6260
6261
4262
10:26:35
GENERAL FUND
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION
VACATIC)NS PLAN CK
DOCUIqENT PROCESSING
CONDEI4NATION PLAN ClIECK
REVERSION TO ACRE. PLAN CHECK
PARCEL HAP PLAN CHECK
TRACT HAP PLAN CHECK
AHENDED NAP PLAN CHECI~
4TN & SUBS, SUBMITTALS
FEMA STUDY REVIEW
LONA REVIEU
DRAINAGE STUDY REVIEU
IMPROVE INSPECTION ON-SITE
K-RAT STUDY FEES
FAST TRACK PLANNING
FORHA FAST TRACK
IN HOUSE PLAN CHECKS
ANNEXATION FEES
TEI4PORARY USE PERMIT
ACCESSCItY WIND ENERGY
LARGE FAHILY DAY CARE
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY
LARD DIV UNIT NAP
LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK
PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
REVENUE STATUS REPORT
SEPTEMBER 1995
ADJUSTED
ESTIHATE
,00
,00
.00
,00
.00
,O0
,OO
.OO
,OO
,OO
.00
,00
.OO
,OO
,OO
.00
,00
.00
.00
,00
.00
.00
,00
150,000.00
SEPTBIBER
REVENUE
.00
.00
.00
.OO
.OO
.00
.00
.00
.O0
.OO
.IX)
.O0
.O0
.00
.OO
300.00
,00
,O0
.00
.00
.00
.OO
1,3O5.oo
7,300.00
1993-9/,
REVEINE
,00
,00
,OO
.OO
,00
,00
,00
,00
,O0
,00
.00
,OO
.00
,00
,00
1,0/0,00
',00
,00
.00
,00
,00
181.00
&,160.00
55,362.00
PAGE 2
NALAN~ Z CQL
,00
,00
,00
,OO
.,00
,00
,OO
,OO
,O0
,OO
.00
,00
,00
.00
,00
1,070.00- ,we
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
,r.~;.
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
October 26, 1993
Public Works Monthly Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly
Activity Reports for September, 1993.
pw 15%egdrpt\93%1026~moeetrpt
TRAFFIC DIVISION
Monthly Activity Report
For September, 1993
Submitted by: Tim D. Serlet
Prepared by: Marty Lauber
TRAFFIC REQUESTS
TRAFFIC REQUESTS: Aug Sept
ReCeived 16 13
Completed 12 9
Under Investigation 2 3
Scheduled for Traffic Commission 0 I
II.
ON GOING PROJECTS:
A.
Ce
D.
E.
F.
G.
He
Refined taxi-cab ordinance to be brought back to Public Traffic Safety Commission fo'
final comments and recommendation to City Council.
Traffic signals.
1.
2.
3.
Margarita Road/Avenida Barca - design completed, drafting services selected
Nicolas Road/Winchester Road - design completed, drafting' services selected
S.R. '79(s)/Margarita Road - initiated design
Safe Route to School Committee - Complete High School safety investigation.
Research new alternative for Emergency Pre-emption System (Opticom).
Completed stop sign, stop ahead sign and sidewalk inventory.
Installation of speed undulations on Calle Pir~a Colana.
Traffic signal turn on for Ynez Road at Town Center/Tower Plaza, south and Margarita
Road at La Serena Way.
Modified traffic signal timing along Ynez Road Corridor to accommodate for
construction activities. ~-,.
pw15%rnoectrpt\traffic%october 101893
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
~f//~Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
October 1, 1993
Monthly Activity Report - September 1993
The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division
in-house personnel for the month of September, 1993:
II.
III.
IV.
SIGNS
A. Total signs replaced
B. Total signs installed
C. Total signs repaired
TREES
A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street
sweeping concerns
POTHOLES
A. Total square feet of potholes repaired
CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins cleaned
RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
A. Total locations
A. Total S.F.
VI.
8
30
8
51
25
70
91,600
15
4,124
Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 16 service order requests ranging from weed abatement,
tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings.
This is compared to 32 service order request of the month August, 1993.
The Maintenance Crew has also put in 73 hours of overtime which includes standby time, P.M.
surveillance (weekends only), and response to street emergencies.
pwOS%roads%e~trpt%93%09 1013
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - AUGUST, 1993
Page 2 _.
ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING AND STENCILING COMPANY has comoleted the following:
· 73,830 L.F. of new and repainted striping
· 317 L.F. of sand blasting
· 6,170 L.F. of red curb
· 109 new and repainted legends
The total cost for Orange County striping service was $14,232.44 compared to $1,906,80 for
August, 1993.
The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of September, 1993
was $57,420.72 compared to $9,812.50 for the month of August, 1993.
Arbor Pro Tree Service has completed the following remove and stump grind I tree knocked down
by a helicopter, the total cost was $325.00,
Account No. 5402 $42,098.72
Account No. 5401 $15,322.00
CC:
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development
Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer
pwO5~roade~actrptt,93~O9 1013
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - AUGUST, 1993
Page 3 __
STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS
The following contractors have performed the following project for the month of July.
NELSON PAVING
Account No. 5402
Date: September 3, 1993
Total A.C. 1.5 Tons
Total S.F. 98
Account No. 5402
Date: September 3, 1993
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
24' x 12' AC Remove and replace
24' x 4' x I AC Overlay
10' x 10' x 1" AC Overlay
10' x 4' x 1" AC Overlay
10' x 12' x 1" AC Overlay
175' x 12' x 1" AC Overlay
Total Shoulder Grading 1,4000 S.F.
Total A.C. 6.5 Tons
Total SoF. 644
AccoUnt No. 5402
Date: September 3, 1993
Remove and replace 12' x 4' AC Street
Excavate to check for cause
Backfill and recompact
Total A.C. I Tons
Total S.F. 48
TOTAL COST: $325.00
TOTAL COST: $2,250.00
TOTAL COST: $270.00
pwO5~roede~e~t~t~93~O9 1013
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - AUGUST, 1993
Page 4
Account No. 5402
Date: September 7, 1993
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Overlay 220' x 4' AC in flowline
Remove existing concrete curb approx. 65
Grade dirt shoulder to drain into creek
Furnish and place approx. 150 In ft. of AC Berm & drainage swell
Grade approx. 200' of shoulder to grade and drain into creek.
AC down spout epprox. 10' width x 10' length with AC berm wraps
Total A.C. 10.5 Tons
Total Shoulder Grading 200'
Total S.F. 1,150
MONTI=LEON; ;XCAVATING
Account No. 5401
Date: September 9, 1993
Deportola Channel
1. Remove silt from channel and reinforce concrete rip-rap
TOTAL COST: $3,725.00
TOTAL COST: $6,200.00
Account No. 5402
Date: September 15, 1993
Front Street ~ Moreno
Front Street at Rancho California Road and Commerce Center Drive at Overland Channel
1. Repaired 4 catch basin lids
TOTAL COST: $3,200.00
NELSON PAVING AND SEALING
Account No. 5402
Date: September 15, 1993
1. Installed 8 speed undulations per the City of Temecula specifications
Total A.C. 75 Tons
Total S.F. 432
TOTAL COST:
$5,192.00
TOTAL COST:
pwO5%roeds~tfpt%93~09 1013
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - AUGUST, 1993
Page 5 __
HOUSTON HARRIS
Account No. 5401
Date: September 17, 1993
1. Cleaned and chased catch basin on Rancho Vista at Southern Cross (4 hours total)
TOTAL COST: ~540.00
RANCHO PAVING
Account No. 5402
Date: September 17, 1993
4600 Classic Way
1. R & R 4' x 4' street failure
Total A.C..5 Ton
Total S.F. 16
Elinda Road n/o Calle Halcon
1. R & R 8.5' x 4.5' street failure
TOTAL COST:
$250.00
Total A.C. 1 Ton
Total S.F. 38
TOTAL COST:
$382.50
BORAL RESOURCES
Account No. 5402
Date: September 24, 1993
Rainbow Canyon Road 1800' s/o Temecula Creek Inn
1. 1" A.C. Overlay 800' x 12' to the tie in with G.T.E. repairs
Total S.F. 9,600
Total A.C. 57 Tons
TOTALCOST:
$1,450.00
pwO5%roecle%aotept~,93~,OI 1013
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - AUGUST, 1993
Page 6 _.
DrL RIO CONTRACTORS
Account No. 5401
Date: September 9, 1993
Ynez Road 150' slo Calle Halcon
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Clean area of 10' x 25' drainage ditch flowline debris
Remove approx. 112 yard native material for 14' x 8" x 6" A.C. curb
Remove approx. 2 yard native material for 10' x 8' - 1/4 to 1/2 tow rip-rap
Place 14' x 8" 6" A.C. curbline
Place 10' x 8' - 1/4 to 1/2 ton - rip-rap with 5 sack concrete
Remove area of 4' x 6' vegetation
Replace approx. I cubic yard native material
Replace area of 3' x 5' 5" A.C. down spout
Patch area of 3' x 4' A.C. curbline
TOTAL COST:
$3,882.00
RANCHO PAVING
Account No. 5401
Date: September 20, 1993
Santiago @ Front Street North and South Channels
1. Clean and restore channels
TOTAL COST:
$2,200.00
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
Account No. 5402
Date: September 28, 1993
Front Street @ McDonalds
1. Remove and replace 53 L.F. of curb and gutter
2. Remove and replace 54 square feet of sidewalk
3. *Extra Sidewalk Repair (R & R) 84.5 square feet at 11.50 square feet
Total S.F. 191.5
Total P.CoC. 5 yards
TOTAL COST:
$2,796.00
pwO5%roede~ctrpt%93%09 1013
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - AUGUST, 1993
Page 7 _.
Account No. 5401
Date: September 28, 1993
Pauba road 112 miles e/o Margarita
1. Repair E.P. erosion around headwall
Total rip-rap 23 tons
Total P.C.C. 5 yards
TOTAL COST:
Account No. 5401
Date: September 24, 1993
Jedidiah Smith Channel Cross of Highway 79 South
1. Excavate Channel 600' x 20'
2. 250 tons exported and backfilled at Calle Velardo R.O.W. wash-out
TOTAL COST:
$3,850.00
$2,500.00
Account No. 5402
Date: September 28, 1993
28980 Front Street
1. Repair under sidewalk drain and sidewalk
Total S.F. 200
Total PoC.C. 5 yards
Account No. 5402
Date: September 24, 1993
Manzano Drive s/o Mira Posa Lane
2.
3.
4.
Repair of 100' CMP backfill approx. 100 sq. feet of slope
Extra 1,000 square feet - no charge
20 ft of 1/2" culvert
Clean and jet culvert - no charge
RANCHO PAVING
Account No. 5402
Date: September 30, 1993
Teatreee at Hollberrry Court
1. Overlay 72 S.F. of A.C. cross gutter
Total A.C. 2 Tons
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL COST:
$990.00
$2,151.72
8486.00
pwOS~roads%actqlt%93%09 1013
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - AUGUST, 1993
Page 8 _.
Account No. 5402
Date: September 30, 1993
Front Street at Del Rio Plaza
1. Remove and replace A.C. street failure and overlays
Total S.F. 606 R & R's
Total S.F. 80 Overlays
Total A.C. 23 Tons
NELSON PAVING
Account No. 5402
Date: September 29, 1993'
29710 Valle Olvera
1. Remove and replace A.C. down spout
Total S.F. 110
Total A.C. 2 Tons
TOTAL COST:
TOTALCOST:
$6,345.50
$837.u0
Account No. 5402
Date: September 29, 1993
Remove and replace approx. 931 sq. ft of concrete sidewalk area and dispose of legally.
Remove and replace 12 In. ft. W/2' gutter and 11' 9" curb W/3' 6" gutter.
Total P.O. $8,275.00
* * * Extra:
Remove and replace 300 sq. ft. of sidewalk area on Via Aguila.-
Remove and replace 120 sq. ft. of sidewalk area on Via Puerta.
Remove and replace 21 In. ft. 2' and 3' curb and gutter.
Total Extra: $4,515.00
Total P.CoC. 20 Yards
Total S.F. 1,384
TOTAL COST:
$12,790.00
pwO5%roede\ec~pt%93%09 1013
J DATE
09-07-93
09-08-93
0909-93
09-13-93
09-13-93
09-14-93
09-15-93
0_~16-93
c -, 6-93
09-20-93
09-20-93
09-22-93
09-24-93
09-24-93
09-27-93
09-27-93
LOCATION
45278 Esplendor
Wolf Valley ~ Pala Road
42431 Cosmic Drive
Mira Loma & Southern Cross
30482 Spica
44077
i-15 @
31007
29611
28516
29610
Northgate Avenue
Hwy. 79 off ramp
Camino del Este
Ramsey Court
Pujol Street
Ramsey Court
Vintage Hills Tract Homes
27511 Bolander
45600 Rainbow Canyon Road
31177 Mariposa Way
29597 Deal Court
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
SEPTEMBER 1993
SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG
REQUEST
Pick-up trash bags
Weed Abatement
Root prune
Catch basin needs cleaning
Trash pick-up concern
Catch basin cleaning
Sand at intersection
Trah pick up concern
Helicopter killed tree
Drainage concern
Request "No Parking" sign for
sweepers.
Sweeper complaint
Trash concern
Paving request
Backfilling culvert covered
drain.
Pick-up trash bags
WORK COMPLETED I
09-08-93
09-09-93
09-09-93
09-13-93
09-14-93
09-14-93
09-15-93
09-16-93
09-16-93
09-20-93
09-20-93
09-22-93
09-24-93
09-24-93
09-27-93
09-28-93
TOTAL SOR'S 16
-1- pwO3\roadslwkcmpltd~09. 100493
~DATE
09-08-93
09'14-93
09-17-93
09-17-93
09-17-93
09-20-93
09-21-93
09-21-93
09-22-93
09-24-93
09-27-93
09-28-93
09-28-93
09-29-93
09-30-93
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
SEPTEMBER 1993
LOCATION
Sl~ort's Park
42540 Escolacata Drive
28559 Pujol Street
Pujol Street N/O Main' Street
Pujol Street S/O 6th Street
300 yards S/O Hwy. 70 S,
Off Raml~
Nicolas Road E/O Warbler
Pep Boys Sign and back
of building.
La Serene ~ Hurkon
Nicolas Road ~ N. Gen. Kearney
La Serena E/O Via Puerta
Rancho California Road @
Calle Bahia Vista
Rancho Calif. Road @
Calle Tajo
28497 and 28450 Pujol Street
County Library
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
WORK COMPLETED
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
208 S.F. of Greffiti
20 S.F. of Graffiti
1 O0 S.F. of Graffiti
80 S.F. of Graffiti
80 S.F. of Graffiti
150 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 730 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 600 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
6 S.F. of Graffiti
700 S.F. of Graffiti
550 S.F. of Graffiti
12 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 180 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 708 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 20 SoF. of Graffiti
TOTAL
4, 124 S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED
-1 - pwO3\roade%wkcmpltd\9.Graffid 100493
DATE
09-01-93
09-01-93
09-01-93
09-01-93
~2-93
0~-O2-93
09-03-93
09-03-93
09-03-93
09-08-93
09-13-93
09-14-93
09-14-93
09-14-93
09-14-93
09-14-93
09-15-93
09~,22-93
09-22-93
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
SEPTEMBER 1993
SIGNS
LOCATION
Margarita NIO Pio Pico
Margarita SIO Pauba
Yukon EIO Copper Beach
La Hacienda @ Front
Margarita N/O Rustic Glen
Margarita S/O Rancho Vista
41847, 41798 & 41762 Humber Drive
Rancho California Road ~i) Town Center
Ynez ~ Coronado
De Portola W/O Verde
Business Park Drive ~) Single Oak
Margarita between Pio Pico & Santiago
Front Street ~ 6th Street and Moreno
Front Street S/O Overland
Jefferson Avenue N/O Overland
Winchester E & W Enterprise Circle
Pina Colada between Del Rey and
La Serena
La Serena ~) Calle Medusa
WORK COMPLETED
Installed W-75 & W-11
Repaired 3 R-26D
Replaced R-26D
Repaired R-2 "45" & installed S.N.S.
(Graffiti)
Installed "City Limit" Sign
Installed R-81A
Installed 3 N.H.W. Signs
Replaced "K" Marker
Replaced R-2 "45" (old)
Replaced Bike Route Sign
Installed S.N.S. & R-1
Repaired
Installed
Installed
Installed
Installed
Installed
2 R-1 (Graffiti)
2 SW 21B
2 SW 21B
I SW 21B
2 SW 21B
4 W 37 and 4 W-6 "15"
Installed N.H.W Sign
Calle Katerene W/O Calle Medusa
Installed N.H.W. Sign
pwO3~roads\wkcmpltd%e3\09.egn 100493
Signe - September, 1993 IContinned}
09-22-93
09-24-93
09-24-93
09-29-93
09-29-93
09-29-93
Margarita SIO Winchester
Piote and Huron
Kaweah @ Calle Medusa
Margarita W/O Brillantine
Margarita EIO Moraga
N. Gen'l Kearney ~i) Margarita
Replaced R-71R-7A "Knock-Down"
Installed W-53
Repaired 2 W-53
Installed W-65-1
Installed W-65
Replaced R-1 and Type "N"
TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED
TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED
TOTAL SIGNS REPNRED
8
30
8
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
SEPTEMBER 1993
I DATE
09-20-93
09-22-93
09-28-93
09-29~93
/
09-30-93
CA TCH BASINS
LOCATION
Rancho Calif. Road to
Margarita
Pala Road, Rainbow Canyon,
Edwardo
WORK COMPLETED
3 catch basins cleaned and secured.
40 catch basins cleaned end secured.
Area #1 (See Daily for
locations.)
11 catch basins cleaned and secured.
Area #1 (See Daily for
locations.)
11 catch basins cleaned and secured.
Area #1 (See Daily for
locations.)
5 catch basins cleaned and secured.
TOTAL CATCH BASINS
CLEANED AND SECURED
70
- 1 - pw03\roads%wkcmpltd\93\09 .CB 100493
I DATE
09-01-93
09-03-93
09-03-93
09-09-93
09-13-93
09-14-93
09-16-93
09-22-93
09-23-3
09-27-93
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
SEPTEMBER 1993
I LOCATION
Las Haciendas O Front
La Serena e~) Margarita
La Serena E/O Margarita
Margarita Road e La Serena
Business Park Drive {b
Single Oak
Calle Pina Colada between
Del 'Rey and La Serena
Rancho Calif. Road EIO Cosmic
Rancho Calif. Road E/O Front
'Front ~i) Rancho Calif. Road
Ave. Barca ~i) Del Rey Road
TREES
WORK COMPLETED
Trimmed 4 trees
Trimmed 4 trees
Trimmed 3 trees
Trimmed 4 trees
Trimmed I tree
Trimmed 9 trees
Trimmed 11 trees
Trimmed '2 trees
Trimmed I tree
Trimmed 12 trees
TOTAL 51 trees trimmed
pwO3~roede%wkemplt~93%,9.tre 100493
DATE
09-01-93
09-02-93
09-02-93
09-02-93
09-02-93
09-03-93
r 8-93
09-08-93
09-09-93
09-10-93
09-10-93
09-10-93
09-13-93
09-14-93
09-16-93
09-20-93
09-20-93
09-20-93
09-21-93
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
SEPTEMBER 1993
LOCATION
Vallejo @ Ynez
Pala Road @ Wolf Valley
Margarita N/O Rustic Glen
Ynez @ Santiago
Wolf Valley Road @ Pala Road
Ynez S/O Santiago
De Portola @ Pio Pico
Ynez Road E/O Vallejo
Pala Road between Wolf Valley
and Loma Linda.
"C" and Santiago
Santiago and Front
La Vida @ Margarita
Moraga @ Rancho California Road
Rancho Calif. Rd. @ Moraga
Rancho Calif. Rd. E/O Moraga
Rancho Calif. Rd. between
Margarita and Meadows Parkway.
Rancho Califo Rd. between
Moraga and Humber.
Rancho Calif. Road N/O Ynez
Rancho Calif. Road W/O Kaiser
WEED ABATEMENT
WORK COMPLETED
Cleared 3,000 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
Cleared
Cleared
Cleared
Cleared
Cleared
Cleared
Cleared
Cleared
250 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
500 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
3,000 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
1,500 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
5,600 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
1,550 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
1,500 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
52,000 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds (Tractor)
Cleared
Cleared
Cleared
Cleared
Cleared
Cleared
Cleared
100
800
300
300
S.F. of R.OoW. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
600 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
3,000 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
1,500 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
Cleared 750 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
Cleared 750 SoF. of R.O.W. Weeds
Cleared 4,000 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
- 1 - pwO3%roads\wkcmpltd%Og.Wee 100493
Weed Abatement - September, 1993 (Continued)
09-22-93
09-22-93
09-23-93
09-24-93
09-28-93
09-28-93
09-28-93
09-28-93
09-29-93
La Serena @ Calle Medusa
Margarita Ext. @ Winchester
Rancho Calif. Road W/O I-15
Margarita S/O Winchester
La Serena Way E/O Calle Medusa
Del Rey @ San Pasqual
Del Rey Road S/O Ave. Barca
Ave. Barca @ Via Monterey
Margarita @ Brillintine
Cleared
Cleared
Cleard
Cleared
Cleared
Cleared
Cleared
Cleared
Cleared
4,000 S.F. of R.OoW. Weeds
1,400 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
2,100 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
2,500 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
500 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
550 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
500 S.Fo of R.O.W. Weeds
1,500 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
250 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
TOTAL S.F. WEED ABATEMENT
91.600
-2- pwO3\roade%wkcmloltd%Og.Wee 100493
:z
I-
0 U
I- Z
In I-
~ z
0
o
U
8 8 t 8 8 8~ 8!
. . m.
z I.-
I- z
0
o
u
0 I-
C~ z
lu I-
1,- Z
lu 0
,,i
u i~,
0
0
_1
i/
!
I-
ll:
o,
(
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Monthly Activity Report
September, 1993
Submitted by:
/rPrepared by:
Tim D. Serlet
Don Spagnolo
WORK UNDER CONSTRUCTION:
Ynez Road:
The Contractor has recently completed construction of the widened portion of the
road north of Solana Way and has re-directed traffic to the new outside lanes.
Removal of the center portion of the road is in progress and the contractor will be
grading for the new median islands. Upon completion of the medians the center lanes
will be graded and paved'. The Contractor intends on paving the final cap for the
entire project after completion of the inside lanes north of Solana Way. Field
surveying for improvements to widen Solana Way has been completed and a plan has
been prepared and submitted to the Contractor for a price proposal for Council
approval.
CRC:
A seal coat is being applied by the Contractor to the exterior masonry block of the
gym, sound wall and retaining walls, after which an anti graffiti coating will be
applied. The interior walls of the gym are being painted and will receive a final coat
of paint in the next week. The Contractor is also in the process of completing the
final touches on the outside of the building so that the windows and doors can be
installed.
The irrigation system for the project has been completed as well as a portion of the
landscaping.
Riverton Park:
Rough grading of the site is complete and the Contractor is in the process of installing
the underground irrigation and storm drain lines, after which the Contractor has
scheduled the construction of the concrete sidewalks.
Jefferson Avenue Storm Drain:
A pre-construction meeting was held to address procedures during construction. The
Contractor is scheduled to start the project the week of October 25, 1993. The total
contract time for the project is thirty (30) working days.
pwlS%moectrpt\cip%october 102693
Rancho Vista Sidewalks:
A pre-construction meeting was held and the construction is scheduled to begin on
October 18, 1993. The final construction time for the project is thirty (30) working
days. ~-
PROJECTS OUT TO BID:
P~ol Street Im[)rovements:
The project was re-bid with a bid opening of October 28, 1993. A recommendation
to award a contract to the apparent low bidder will be presented at the November 9,
1993 City Council meeting.
Pala Community Park:
Bids were received on September 30, 1993. A recommendation to award a contract
to the apparent low bidder will be presented at the October 26, 1993 City Council
meeting.
PROJECTS UNDER DESIGN:
SDOrtS Park Slope ReDair:
Final design plans have been completed and the project will be sent out for public bid.
Margarita Road Sidewalk Improvements:
Construction documents and specifications are being prepared for sidewalk
improvements on the east side of Margarita Road between Rancho Vista Road and
Pauba Road. This project-will be constructed with SB821 funds.
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
Liefer Road. John Warner Road. Santiago Road and Walcott Corridor:
Staff is currently preparing Requests for Proposals (RFP) for providing Professional
Engineering Services to prepare plans and specifications for the required road
improvements.
pw15~moactrpt~,cip~october 102893
"r ~Z
~o o ~ d d
:::)z ..t- ,.-
¢J11.,- i-- * *
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
APPROVAL:
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Anthony Eimo, Chief Building Official
October 26, 1993
Building and Safety September, 1993, Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
DISCUSSION:
The following is a summary of activity for September, 1993:
Building Permits Issued ..................................... ;205
Building Valuation ................................... $11,282, 163
Revenue Collected .................................... $120, 167
Housing Starts ............................................. 88
New Commercial Starts ........................... 2 = 9,365 Sq. Ft.
Commercial Additions/Alterations .................... 8 = 14,530 Sq. Ft.
Building Inspections ...................................... 2,450
V:%WI~AGENDA.REI~$ept'93.Rpt
Agenda Report
October 26, 1993
Page 2
- Code Enforcement Actions ................................... 147
Active Cases Pending ....................................... 138
Closed Cases .............................................. 20
V:%WP~AGENDAoREP~Sept'93. Rpt
Z
Z
0
ZlO
0
0
0
0
!
l
iii
i!1
COMMUNITY SERVICES
DISTRICT
ITEM
NO.
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMU__NITY SERVICES DISTRICT
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 1993
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order on
Tuesday, September 28, 1993, 8:30 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol
Street, Temecula, California. President Patricia H. Birdsall presiding.
PRESENT: 5
ABSENT: 0
DIRECTORS: Mur~oz, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
DIRECTORS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, Assistant City Manager Herwood Edvalson,
City Attorney Scott F. Field, City Clerk June S. Greek end Recording Secretary Gail Zigler.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Roberts to approve Consent Calendar
Items No. I - 3.
The motion was unanimously carried as follows:
AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: Mu~oz, Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Birdsall
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
1. CombinincJ Balance Sheet as of June 30. 1993 and the Statement of Revenues,
Exoenditures and ChanQes in Fund Balance for the Year Ended June 30.1993
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Receive and file the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balance for the Year Ended June 30, 1993;
1.2 Transfer $37,808 from various recreation operating accounts to Project
Employees' Salaries.
CSDMIN09/28193 -1 - 10105/93
COMMUNITY SERVICES MINUTES SEPTEMBER 28, 1993
2. Resolution Establishino a Petty Cash Fund for Temecula Community Services District
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 93-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING A =PETTY CASH" FUND
3. Naminq of CRC Amohitheater
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Approve naming the Amphitheater in the Temecula Community Recreation
Center as the Thomas H. Langley Amphitheater.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
Rancho Del Sol Landscaoe Improvements
Community Services Director Shawn Nelson presented the staff report.
It was moved by Director Mur~oz, seconded by Director Stone to approve staff
recommendation as follows:
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Receive and file report regarding the slope maintenance survey of property
owners along Margarita Road within the Rancho Del Sol and Verano
Developments.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
None
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
Community Services Director Shawn Nelson reported the following:
The bid opening for Pala Community Park will be Thursday, September 30,
1993.
CSDMINO9128193 -2- I 0106/93
SEPTEMBER 98, 1993
COMMUNITY SERVICES MINUTES
- Construction of Riverton Park will begin this week.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
Director Parks asked whether staff has addressed his previous request to consider using the
Northwest Sports Complex as a retention basin for storm run-off.
Director Nelson said staff is currently considering how the Northwest Sports complex will be
administered and that will be presented to the Community Services Commission and the
Council.
Director Parks stated there is a sense of urgency with the matter of County Flood Control
incorporating this property into the final plan.
Director Mur~oz suggested Mr. Nelson contact County Flood Control at the earliest possible
time and discuss with them their possible for this site.
President Birdsall commended Community Services Director Nelson and staff on the Old Town
Temecula Senior Center. President Birdsall advised there is · a group traveling cross country
celebrating the 50th anniversary of the first U.S. senior center, who she will contact and ask
to make Temecula one of their stops.
Director Stone proposed that the City sponsor a "Drug and Health Fair" at the Old Town
Temecula Senior Center. Director Stone said he could arrange for free cholesterol, blood
sugar and blood pressure testing as well as inviting representatives from the major drug
manufacturers at no cost to the City.
It was approved by consensus to allow Director Stone to coordinate with City staff to provide
a Drug and Health Fair at the Old Town Temecula Senior Center.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Roberts to adjourn at 8:45 P.M.
The next regular meeting of the Temecula Community Service District will be held on
Tuesday, October 12, 1992, 8:00 PM, at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol
Street, Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
President Patricia H. Birdsall
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CSDMINOg/28193
-3- 10/05193
ITEM
NO.
2
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER
OCTOBER 26, 1993
ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEED FOR KENT HINTERGARDT
MEMORIAL PARK - THE PRESLEY COMPANIES
PREPARED BY:
BERYL YASINOSKY, MANAGEMENT ASSISTANT
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
Accept a grant deed from The Presley Companies for Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park,
a nine (9) acre park within Tract No. 23267-2, subject to the Presley Companies
making suitable arrangements to clear title of the reservoir easement. Such
arrangements shall be approved by the Director of Community Services and the City
Attorney.
DISCUSSION: Pursuant to an agreement between the TCSD and The
Presley Companies dated September 30, 1991, the developer is dedicating a nine-acre
park, named Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park, to the City. The park is located on Via
Del Coronado, between Highway 79 South and Pala Road. The amenities of the park
include a tot lot, picnic tables, barbecues, drinking fountain, shade trees, and
approximately five (5) acres of turfed open space area for active play.
This park has been inspected and approved by the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent.
The enclosed grant deed has been reviewed by staff to insure that all legal
requirements have been satisfied. A policy of title insurance has also been provided
by the developer to accompany the transfer of title to the City.
FISCAL IMPACT: Cost of maintaining this park is included within the TCSD
Rates and Charges for FY 1993/94 - Community Services, Parks, and Recreation.
ATTACHMENTS:
Vicinity/Location Map
Grant Deed from The Presley Companies.
EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY
City of Temecula
PER .GOV'T CODE § 6103
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
Office of the City Clerk
City of Temecula
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO:
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
GRANT DEED
The undersigned grantor declares:
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, THE PRESLEY COIvIPANIES, a California corporation, hereby grants to
the CITY OF TEMECULA, a body corporate and politic, the foliowing described real
property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
Executed on
California.
THE PRESLEY COMPANIES,
a California corporation
BY:
its:
BY:
its:
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
WITNESS my hand and official sea/.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ~
On ~;>-,~ g' q,,~ , before me, the undersigned. a Notary PubLic in and for
the State of California, ersona/ly appeared C-,~person~n~ '~t,~ ~(
/I)~-Z~ ~. ~~~" y known to o~ proved
to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they
executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
. ( ~ OFFICIALSEAL
NANCY J. WEBB
( N~r~RV mmuc-
My C~m. 8mWes June 3. 1994
CONSENT
The City of Temecula hereby consents to the grant of real property set forth
above.
City of Temecula
BY:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
ATTEST:
BY:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY: ~ ~
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
EXHIBIT "A"
Lot 184 of Tract No. 23267-2, as shown by Map on file in Book 237, pages 63
through 69 of Maps, Records of Riverside County, California.
ITEM
NO.
3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Board of Directors
FROM: David F. Dixon, City Manager
DATE: October 26, 1993
SUBJECT: Award of Contract for Construction of Pale Community Park
(Project No. PW93-03CSD)
PREPARED BY.' ~Dhawn Nelson, Director of Community Services
on Spagnolo, Principal{~ Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the plans and specifications for the construction of Pala Community Park,
Project No. PW93-03CSD.
e
Award a construction contract in the amount of $2,757,566.00 to Martin J. Jaska,
Inc. and authorize the President to execute the contract.
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency of $275,756.60 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
Approve an agreement with Kingsway DeVelopment Corporation to reimburse
the City $149,015.00 for off-site street and flood control improvements.
BACKGROUND:
On December 8, 1992, the City Council approved the master plan for Pale Community Park,
authorized the preparation of construction plans and specifications, and released a formal
public bid for the construction of Pala Community Park. Construction of Pala Community Park
includes, but is not limited to, on and offsite improvements such as grading, landscaping and
irrigation, asphalt paving and concrete, drainage facilities, recreational and playground
facilities, lighting, and utilities. The total engineer's estimate including the additive alternates
for this project is $2,700,000.
The bid proposals include 4 additive bid items. The first three additive bid items are for the
construction of a restroom facility. The proposed location of the building currently lies within
the floodway of Temecula Creek. However, the City is currently processing an application
- 1 - pw 13%egdrpt%93% 1026%pw93-03 .awd
with the Federal Emergency Management Agency to have the restroom facility removed from
the floodway. A favorable response is expectecLwithin 90 days. The fourth additive bid item
is for improvements to be constructed within a MWD easement.
Twelve bids for the project were publicly opened on September 30, 1993. The following bids
were received which include the base bid and the four additive alternates:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Martin J. Jaska .............. $2,757,566.00
Skidmore Contracting Corporation . ~2,839,721.00
L.R. Hubbard Construction Co., Inc. $2,888,087.00
Marina .................... $3,056,000.00
T.B. Penick & Sons, Inc ......... $3,096,500.00
Menefee/Larson Construction Co. $3,140,341.00
Baldi Bros. Constructors ........ $3,159,083.00
Micon Engineering, Inc .......... $3,159,534.11
Terra-Cal Construction, Inc ....... $3,280,000.00
West Coast General Corporation .. $3,307,917.80
Valley Crest Landscape, Inc ...... $3,347,796.00
Commercial Contractors, Inc ..... $3,404,100.00
Martin J. Jaska, Inc. has not previously provided construction services for the City. However,
favorable recommendations have been recieved from agencies in the Counties of Riverside,
San Bernardino, and Orange. A total of 270 calendar days have been allowed for construction
which is scheduled to begin in mid November of 1993 and be completed by mid August of
1994.
An agreement with Kingsway Development Corporation to reimburse the City a total of
$149,015.00 for costs associated with constructing off-site street and flood control
improvements has been developed· As specified in Attachment B, the City shall be fully
reimbursed within five (5) years of the execution of said agreement or at such time that
Kingsway's property (Tract No. 21067) is sold, whichever is first.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
-2- pw131agdrpt%93~.1026%pw93-O3 .awd
FISCAL IMPACT:
This Capital Improvement Project is funded by Development Impact Fees ($3,010,000) and
CFD 88-12 ($350,000). The Development Impact Fee account will be reimbursed
$149,015.00 through an agreement with Kingsway Development Corporation for off-site
costs as described in Attachment B. The total project cost of $3,033,322.60 includes the
Contract amount of $2,757,566.00 plus the 10% contingency of $275,756.60. Funds have
been appropriated to the Capital Improvement account numbers 210-190-120-5804 and 210-
190-131-5802.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Construction Contract
2. Reimbursement Agreement
-3- pwl 3%egdrpt\93\1026~pw93-O3.awd
ATTACHMENT 1
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
-4- pwl 3%agdrpt%93%1026%pw93-O3.awd
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PALA COMMUNITY PARK
PROJECT NO. PW 93.-03 CSD
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the day of ,1993 , by
and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and
Martin J. Jaska. Inc. , hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as
follows:
1.8.
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents,
to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and
Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW 93-03 CSD, Insurance
Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California
Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically
referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard
Soecifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and
promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the
American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard
Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and
Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW 93-03 CSD. Copies of these Standard
Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will (;0ntrol the general provisions, construction materials, and
construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the Genera| Specifications,
Special Provisions, Technical Specifications, and Plans and Specifications to PROJECT NO.
PW 93-03 CSD.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents,
the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such
conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in
complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed
and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise
specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and
incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
CONTRACT CA- 1 t:\bids\pebcoa~.pddrev:0~0993
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as
binding as if called for by all. Any conflict. between this Contract and any other Contract
Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall
provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all
utility and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW 93-03 CSD
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance
with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents
hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished
and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the
approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to
accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: Two Million.
Seven Hundred & Rftv Seven Thousand, Rve Hundred & Sixty Six DOLLARS and __
00 ClgVI'S ($ 2,757,566.00 ), the total amount of the base bid and alternate bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed Two Hundred
Seventy (270) working days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY.
Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that
the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order,
changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as
established by the City Council.
PAYMENTS. On or about the thirtieth (30th) day of the month next following the
commencement of the work, there shall be paid to the CONTRACTOR a sum equal to
ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed since the commencement of the
work. Thereafter, on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the
work progresses, the CONTRACTOR shall 'be paid such sum as will bring the payments
each month up to ninety percent (90%) of the previous payments, provided that the
CONTRACTOR submits his request for payment prior to the last day of .each preceding
month. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be
made sixty (60) days after CITY acceptance of the work and the CONTRACTOR filing a
one-year warranty with the CITY on a warranty form provided by the CITY. Payments shall
be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate
signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has
been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated
in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments \on the Contract
price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work.
WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion i.~ ""
recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warrant~/
CONTRACT CA-2 la~bids~!~ac'om.pddrev:O80993
WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is
recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion_~f the Contract award price, to assure warranty
performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following
schedule:
10.
CONTRACT AMOUNT
$25,000-$75,000
$75,000- $500,000
Over$500,000
RETENTION PERIOD
180 days
180 days
One Year
RETENTION PERCENTAGE
3%
$ 2,250 + 2% of amount
in excess of $75,000
$10,750 + 1% of amount
in excess of $500,000
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code
Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One
Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond
the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted
from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be
deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR
will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for
unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or negligence of the
CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly
notify CITY of any such delay.
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. Unless a shorter time is specified elsewhere in this Contract, on or
before making final request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall
submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation under or arising out of this Contract;
the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of the final payment shall constitute a waiver of all
claims against CITY under or arising out of this Contract except those previously made in
writing and request for payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit,
release and indemnify agreement with each claim for payment.
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the
State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem
wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft,
classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of
the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies
may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post
a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates
as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775,
1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each
laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any
work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of
the provisions of the Contract.
CONTRACT CA-3 la~bide%palncom.prlrJrev:010993
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this Contract.
INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or
in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone.
CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers,
employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly
out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
CONTRACTOR'S INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION. No plea of ignorance of conditions that
exist or that may hereafter exist or of conditions of difficulties that may be encountered in
the execution of the work under this Contract, as a result of failure to make the necessary
independent examinations and investigations, and no plea of reliance on initial investigations
or reports prepared by CITY for purposes of letting this Contract out to bid will be accepted
as an excuse for any failure or omission on the part of the CONTRACTOR to fulfill in every
detail all requirements of this Contract. Nor will such reasons be accepted as a basis for
any claims whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or
representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable
treatment with respect thereto.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee,
or any architect, engineer, or other puerperal of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been
employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon
the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the
Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been
filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR
Corporations:
The signature must contain the name of the corporation, must be signed by the President
and Secretary or Assistant Secretary, and the corporate seal must be affixed. Other
persons may sign for the corporation in lieu of the above if a certified copy of a resolution
of the corporate board of directors so authorizing them to do so is on file in the City Clerk's
office.
CONTRACT CA-4 !a\bid~\!~l~om,pdd~w:0S0~93
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
PartnerShiPs:
The names of all persons comprising the partnership or co-partnership must be sta~ed. The
bid must be signed by all partners comprising the partnership unless proof in the form of
a certified copy of a certificate of partnership acknowledging the signer to be a general
partner is presented to the City Clerk, in which case the general partner may sign.
Joint Ventures:
Bids submitted as joint ventures must so state and be signed by each joint venturer.
Individuals:
Bids submitted by individuals must be signed by the bidder, unless an up-to-date power of
attorney is on file in the City Clerk's office, in which case said person may sign for the
individual.
The above rules also apply in the case of the use of a fictitious firm name. In addition,
however, where the fictitious name is used, it must be so indicated in the signature.
SUBSTITUTED SECURITY. In accordance with Section 22300 of the Public Contracts
Code, CONTRACTOR may substitute securities for any monies withheld by the CITY to
insure performance under the Contract. At the request and expense of the CONTRACTOR,
securities equivalent to the amount withheld shall be deposited with the CITY or with a
State or Federally chartered bank or an escrow agent who shall pay such monies to the
CONTRACTOR upon notification by CITY of CONTRACTOR's satisfactory completion of the
Contract. The type of securities deposited and the method of release shall be approved by
the City Attorney's office.
RESOLUTION OF CLAIMS. Any dispute or claim arising out of this Contract shall be
arbitrated pursuant to Section 10240 of the California Public Contracts Code.
NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any
actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of
the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant
information with respect thereto, to CITY.
BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof
as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be
subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
UTILITY LOCATION. CITY acknowledges its responsibilities with respect to locating utility
facilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 4215.
CONTRACTOR shall contact the appropriate regional notification center in accordance with
Government Code Section 4216.2.
CONTRACT CA-5 la%bkb\l~lacom.pddr~v:010993
24.
25.
26.
TRENCH PROTECTION AND EXCAVATION. CONTRACTOR shall submit its detailed plan
for worker protection during the excavati_0~_ of trenches required by the scope of the work
in accordance with Labor Code Section 6705.
CONTRACTOR shall, without disturbing the condition, notify CITY in writing as soon
as CONTRACTOR, or any of CONTRACTOR's subcontractors, agents, or employees
have knowledge and reporting is possible, of the discovery of any of the following
conditions:
The presence of any material that the CONTRACTOR believes is hazardous
waste, as defined in Section 25117 of the Health and Safety Code;
ii.
Subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site differing from those
indicated in the specifications; or
III.
Unknown physical conditions at the site of any unusual nature, different
materially for those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as
inherent in work of the character provided for in this Contract.
Pending a determination by the CITY of appropriate action to be taken,
CONTRACTOR shall provide security measures (e.g., fences) adequate to prevent
the hazardous waste or physical conditions from causing bodily injury to any person.
CITY shall promptly investigate the reported conditions. If CITY, through, and in the
exercise of its sole discretion, determines that the conditions do materially differ, or
do involve hazardous waste, and will cause a decrease or increase in the
CONTRACTOR's cost of, or time required for, performance of any part of the work,
then CITY shall issue a change order.
de
In the event of a dispute between CITY and CONTRACTOR as to whether the
conditions materially differ, or involve hazardous waste, or cause a decrease or
increase in the CONTRACTOR's cost of, or time required for, performance of any
part of the work, CONTRACTOR shall not be excused from any scheduled
completion date, and shall proceed with all work to be performed under the contract.
CONTRACTOR shall retain any and all rights which pertain to the resolution of
disputes and protests between the parties.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as
to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance
notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be
made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin,
color, sex, age, or handicap.
CONTRACT CA-6 l=~bids\p=lacom.prk/r~v:0~0~3
27.
GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by
the law of the State of California.
28.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and
to the CITY addressed as follows:
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date
first above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR
By:
DATED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Print or type NAME
Print or type TITLE
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
J, Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CONTRACT CA-7 ]=\bidj~pml~om.pddrev:0S0993
ATTACHMENT 2
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
-5- pw 13%,egdrpt%93\1026%pw93-03 .ewd
TEMECULA LANE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made as of October 26, 1993, by and between the City of
Temecula ('City') and Kingsway Development Corporation, a California corporation,
('Owner"), with respect to the following:
RECITALS
R-1. Owner owns the real property legally described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and
incorporated herein (the 'Property'), which is adjacent to Lorna Linda Road in the City of
Temecuh, California.
R-2. The County of Riverside approved Tentative Tract Map No. 21067.
R-3. On or about April 23, 1991, Owner signed a Subdivision Improvement Agreement
for Tract No. 21067 (the 'Improvement Agreement').
R-4. On or about April 23, 1991, the City Council of the City authorized recordation
of the final map for Tract 21067, which Map was recorded on May 3, 1991.
R-5. The Improvement Agreement required that Owner, no later than October 23,
1992, install certain improvements, including construction of Temecula Lane and installation of
certain facilities to provide access to a Metropolitan Water District ClVlWD") pipeline
(hereinafter referred to collectively as the "Improvements").
R-6. To secure performance of the Improvement Agreement, Owner filed with the City
Bond No. 117-85-65 of the Insurance Company of the West.
R-7. Pursuant to the "Park Agreement" dated April 23, 1991 between City and Owner,
Owner dedicated Lots 82, 88 and 89 of Tract 21067 to the City to be developed as Pala
Community Park.
R-8. Development of Pala Community Park requires installation of the Improvements.
R-9. The City has obtained formal bids for construction of the Improvements. The
lowest bidder is Martin J. Jaska, Inc.
AGRF-~JENT
NOW, TI-mREFORE, the parties hemto agree as follows:
1. Owner shall reimburse City for one hundred percent (100%) City's actual
costs and expenses in connection with the design and construction plus of the Improvements,
plus ten percent (10%) overhead (hereinafter referred to as the *Reimbursements). The
estimated costs for the Reimbursement shall include the following items as shown within the
attached Bid Result Spreadsheet (Exhibit B):
A. Temecula Lane
B. MWD Facilities
Co
Extended Bid Amounts
$ 77.342.00
$ 41.870.00
$
Subtotal $119.212.00
10% City Overhead $ 11.921.20
15% Contingency $ 17.881.80
Total $149.015.00
2. A fifteen percent (15 %) contingency shall be applied to the total estimated
cost of the Improvements without prior approval by Owner or Insurance Company of the West
to account for unforeseen change orders. Prior to the approval of any change orders over and
above the fifteen percent (15%) contingency associated with these items, City shall obtain
approval from Owner and Insurance Company of the West before authorizing the Contractor to
proceed, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. City shall make payment to the
Contractor for work performed. Actual costs shall be identified and billed to Owner with all
invoices, receipts and supporting documentation.
3. The Reimbursement shall be subject to interest, calculated at a rate of 7%
per annum, simple interest, beginning from November 1, 1993, and accruing interest until the
Reimbursement is repaid to City.
4. Prior to the sale, transfer or assignment of the Property to anyone other
then Owner, or by November 1, 1998, whiches.~ occurs first, Owner shall pay the City the
Reimbursement owing City. No grading permit or building permit shall be issued for Tract
21067 unless and until Owner has paid City the Reimbursement.
5. Should Owner fail to timely pay City the Reimbursement, City may make
demand on said Bond No. 117-85-65 for the Reimbursement. Insurance Company of the West
shall pay the City the Reimbursement within seven days of receiving the City demand.
6. Within seven days of execution of this Agreement, Owner shall execute
the Sewer Easement attached hereto as Exhibit C and deliver said Easement to the City. City
may record said Easement upon receipt.
7. This Agreement and any amendment may be recorded with the County
Recorder of Riverside County. All parties agree to execute a termination of this Agreement in
recordable form upon the completion of the obligations of Owner hereunder.
8. Any notice given hereunder shall be deemed effective (i) on receipt by
receipted personal delivery; (ii) one business day after being sent by a recognized overnight mail
delivery service; or (iii) two business days after being deposited in the U.S. Mail, first class
postage prepaid, certified, return receipt requested. Notices shall be sent addressed as follows:
City:
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Attention: City Clerk
Owner:
Kingsway Development Corporation
3838 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 380
San Diego,CA 92108-1741
Bonding:
Insurance Company of The West
2645 Financial Court, Suite D
San Diego, CA 92117
Any party may change its address for receipt of notice by giving written notice
to all other parties.
9. This Agreement sets forth and contains the entire understanding and
agreement of the parties, and there are no oral or written representations, understandings, or
ancillary covenants, undertakings or agreements which are not contained or expressly referred
to herein. No testimony or evidence of any such representations, undertakings or covenants
shall be admissible in any proceeding of any kind or nature to interpret or determine the terms
or conditions of this Agreement.
10. If any tens, provision, co~.enant or condition of this Agreement shall be
determined invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected
thereby to the extent such remaining provisions are not rendered impractical to perform, taking
into consideration the purposes of this Agreement.
11. This Agreement and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed and
interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. This Agreement shall be
construed as a whole according to its fair language and common meaning to achieve the
objectives and purposes of the parties hereto. The rule of the construction to the effect that.
ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not be employed in interpreting
this Agreement, all parties having been represented by counsel in the negotiation and preparation
hereof.
12. Failure by a party to insist upon the strict performance of any of the
provisions of this Agreement by the other party, or the failure by a party to exercise its rights
upon the default of the other party, shall not constitute a waiver of such party's right to insist
and demand strict compliance by the other party with the terms of this Agreement thereafter.
13.
counterparts shall
executed the same
This Agreement may be executed by the parties in counterparts, which
be construed together and have the same effect as if all of the parties had
instrument.
14. Each of the parties shall cooperate with and provide reasonable assistance
to the other to the extent contemplated hereunder in the performance of all obligations under this
Agreement and the satisfaction of the conditions of this Agreement. Upon the request of either
party at any time, the other party shall promptly execute, with acknowledgment or affidavit if
reasonably required, and file or record such required instruments and writings and take any
actions as may be necessary under the terms of this Agreement to carry out the intent and to
fulfill the provisions of this Agreement or to evidence or consummate the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement.
15. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Owners
warrants and represents that he/they have the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of
is/their corporation, partnership or business entity and warrants and represents that
he/they/has/have the authority to bind Owners to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
16. Entering into or a breach of this Agreement shall not affect, render invalid,
diminish or impair the lien of any mortgage on the Property made in good faith and for value.
17. For purposes of sales of improved lots to consumers, this Agreement, if
recorded, shall be deemed to terminate as to individual lots upon the issuance by City of a notice
of completion for a structure on said lot.
18. Should it become necessary for any party to bring legal action to enforce
any provision of this Agreement, then the prem'_'ling party in such action shall be entitled to
recover all attomey's fees and court costs reasonably incurred thereby.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as
of the day and year f'n'st set forth above.
CITY OF TEMECULA:
Dated: By:
J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field
City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek
City Clerk
KINGSWAY
Dated:
By:
Name:
Title:
INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST
Dated:
By:
Name:
Title:
City of Tamsouls
43174 Business Park Circle
Tamsouls, CA 92590
SPACE ASOVETHZS LINE FCRRECORDER'S USE
TAX 2TAT~IEITS TO:
A.P.N. 950-110-021
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDBRATION, RECEIPT OF WHICH IS HEREBY
ACKNOWLEDGED,
here~ GRANTS to
Kingsway Construction Corporation,
a california Corporation
City of Temecula, a Body Corporate and Politic
the real property in the City of T~mecula, County of Riverside,
State of California, described
An easement for construction, operation, maintenance and repair of
sewer laterals, manholes, cleanouts, and appurtenances over, along
and across those portions of Tract 21067, according to Hap thereof
recorded in Book 231 at Pages 41 through 48 inclusive o~ Naps,
Records of said County, more psz~cicularly described in Bxhibit mmA",
attached hereto and inccrporated herein, and illustrated in Exhibit
"5", etUched hereto for reference only.
This easement is'granted subject'to the following conditional
Grantee and Grantor agree to cooperate with each other to the
fulleat extent possible end for their mutual benefit in
fulfilling the terms of this agreement.
The easement granted herein is for the sole purpose 'of
providing sanitary sewer service for a public park to be
constructed by Grantee on Lots 87, 66 and 89 of said Tract
21067, and for no other purpose.
The sanitary sewer system to be installed under this a reamant
within Grantor's land consists of a temporary portion, ths
easement for which is described as Parcel 1 and a portion of
Parcel 2 in Exhibit "A" here=o, and a permanent portion,
described as & portion of Parcel 2.
Grantee agrees to construct sewer system and all appurtenances
at its sole cost and expense, to complete construction in a
timely fashion, and to restore =he surface o( the ground as
near asptactical to the'conditions which existed prior ~o the
star= of construction, including but not limited to the
restoration cf surface grades, fences, and walls. Grantee
will reseed area and install temporary erosion control
features es required by its Storm Water Pollu~ton Preven~ion
Plan, ~ich will be pert of the construction documents for
8ubJec~ perk.
Grantee agrees to hold harmless and defend Grantor from any
and all damages cf any kind resultinq from =he negligence of
grantee's employees, aVen~s, or assigns with regard to the
construction, operation cr maintenance oft he subject sanitary
sewer facilities. Grates also a~ses ~o ind~i~y ~or
a~ains: all liens, claims or o~sr enc~rances for lair,
maWrisle or ~aponen~s resultAny from s~ec~ sewer
~ns~i~n.
As of the date of this easement, plans for development of
site improvements for saidTract 21067 have been completed and
approved by the City of temecula, but no construction work has
begun. Grantor will notify Grantee. of its Antant ~ star=
construction of the improvements' as far In advance as
practical, and will sequence and stage its construction such
that antes's sewer in this easement will remain in service
at al~times. Grantor will be responsible for the cost of
repatrAnq and meintaininq An service any of Grantee's sewer
·
facilities which are damaqad or disturbed by Grantor s
aonstruction activities. When Grantor has aompleted
construction of~ne permanent sewer facilities in said Treat,
he will cormeat Srantee's sewer laterals toeaid permanent
facilities, at no aost to Grantee.
7. After the permanent facilities for Tract 21067 are completed
and in service, Grantor will, at its sole cost and expense, do
all things necessary to abandon the lateral connection ~o the
public sewer main in Pale Road, after the temporary portion cf
~he sewer installed under tats aqreement is no longer
required. At that time Grantee shall prepare and record a
quitclaim deed, releasing all rig~, title, and interest in
and to said Parcel 1, and to that portion of said Parcel 2
occupied by temporary sewer facilities. Grantor and Grantee
agree ~hat since the temporary facilities installed in said
Parcel 1 wall be of such small ease, and will be installed at
such depth the= they may be abandoned in place, that no
special work will be required by either party in order to
effect said abandonment. Grantor will be free to destroy any
end all portions of said facilities .ms may be ~eceesary to
complete construction of its tract improvements.
The par~ies hereto agree that the permanent portions of
Easement Parcel 2 which are located in Lots 27 and 28 of said
Tract 21067 shall not be restricted as to the use of the
surface o~ the land therein by the ultimate purchasers of the
finished lots and ~a~st the planting of shrubs or ,the
construction of auxiliary residential improvements such as
decks, fences, pa~ios and other amenAries shall not be
prohibited by Grantee, except as required by local ordinances.
No trees shall be planted An said easements. In the event
that Grantee must dis=urD any such surface improvements,
including landscaping or fences, in order to repair or
maintain its sewer,' Grantee shall restore or repair said
improvements to a condition which approximates as closely as
possible that which existed prior =o the start cf any work
tilerein.
This agreement is Antended tO run wASh the land, and to be
~indtng upon the parties hereto, their successors and assigns.
Dated:
KINGSWAY CONSTRUCTION CORpORATION
a California Corporation
By:
Marilyn Carney, Secretary
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
SS
On before me, ,
personally appeared Maril~n Carnay, personally known to me (or
proved to me on the basis of sa=isfautory evidence) to Be the
person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that she execu=ed the same in her authorized
capacity, and that by her signature on the instruman= =he person,
or the enti=y upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the
instrument.
Witness my hand and o~ficial seal.
Signature:
CON~R~T
The city of Temecula hereby consen=s to the grant of real
property set forth above.
CITY OF TEMECULA
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALI[ORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
SS
BY:
Sal Munoz, Mayor
On before me, the undersigned, a Notary
Public in and for the State 'of California, personally appeared
, personallyknown to me (or
proved to me on the bas~S o~ sa~isfactory evidence) to be the
person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized
capaci=y, and that by his signature on the instrument the person,
or the en~ity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature:
~ ~ DO&~ION OF T~J~CN~ 2~m067, I~ ~B~ CITY
F~T IN WI~H~ 5.00 FE~ EACH SIDE OF THE FO~WING-DESCRIBED
CEdESINE:
B~I~G AT A POI~ IN ~ WEST~Y LINE OF LOT D OF SAID ~CT
· 21067, SAID POINT BEING ~S0 IN THE C~LINE OF C~ERFIE~
DRIVE, 60.00 F~T WIDE ~ SHO~ ON THE ~ OF ~ID T~$ THENCE
SO~ 03'24'06" WEST 0.47 FE~ TO T~ ~ ~ OF B~~G~
TH~CE SO~ 46'13'39" WEST 203.83 FEET~ ~NCE NOR~ 85'05'15"
WEST 150.00 F~T TO POINT "A"~ T~CE SO~H 30'38'59" ~ST 706.55
FEET TO A POI~ IN ~E SO~ST~Y LINE OF SAID ~CT, SAID POI~-
B~NG NOR~ 47'44'36e ~ST 744.83 [=ET FROM THE SO~H~T~Y
CO~ OF SAID ~, SAID POINT BEING ~SO IN T~ NORT~Y
SIDEINE OF P~ RO~, 110 FE~ ~DE.
SAID P~C~ LIES ~IN PORTIONS OF ~TS 35, 36, 37, 77, 78, .71,
70, ~9, 68, 56, 55, 8 ~D ~ OF SAID ~ 21067, ~ WITHIN
PORTIONS OF ~ERFI~D DRIVE (LETT~ED ~OT "C") , JEDEDI~ SMITH
ROAD (LE~~ ~T "A"), ~I~.D DRIVE (LETT~ED ~OT "F"),
~SDALE DRIVE (LETT~D LOT "B") , DEDICATED ON S~D ~ B~ NOT
Y~ CONS~U~ED.
PARCEL 2
ALL THAT PORTION OF SAID TRACT 21067 LYING WITHIN A 10.00 FOOT WIDE
STRIP OF LAND, 5.00 FEET EACH SIDE OF THE FO~LOWING DESCR/BED
CENTERLINE:
BEGINNING AT THE'SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 89 OF SAID TRACT, SAID
POINT BEING IN A 5,500 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A
RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARING $OUTE 13'25'02" EAST: THENCE
EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF "bS'55'39" AN
ARC DISTANCE OF 569.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POIlqT OF BEGINNING~ THENCE
SOUTH 07'29'23" WEST 176.43 FEET~ T~IENCE SOUTH 51'49'00"' EAST
226.17 FEET MORE OR LESS TO POINT "A", HEREINBEFORE DESCRIBED IN
PARCEL i ABOVE.
SAID PARCEL LIES WITHIN PORTIONS OF LOTS 27, 28, 73, 74, AND 75 OF
SAID TRACT 21067, AND WITHIN PORTIONS OF CANTERFIELD DRIVE
(LETTERED LOT "C") AND REIN COURT (LETTERED LOT "E") , DEDICATED ON
SAID TRACT BUT NOT YET CONSTRUCTED.
ITEM
NO.
4
! DPROVLT~ ~ -
C'rTY XTTORN~Y
P'rNANCZ OF~'rC~R
C:!:TY NXt~AGgR
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FROM:
DAVID F. DIXON
DATE:
OCTOBER 26, 1993
SUBJECT:
COMMUNITY SERVICES RECREATION BROCHURE
PREPARED BY:
HERMAN D. PARKER, RECREATION SUPERINTENDENT
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors:
Accept proposal of $20,893.00 from Graphics Unlimited to produce two (2) issues of the
Community Services Recreation Brochure.
DISCUSSION: A Request for Proposal (RFP) was released by the City to solicit
proposals for the development and professional production of two (2) issues of the
Community Services Recreation Brochure. The winter/Spring issue will be distributed city-
wide on January 7, 1994 and the summer/fall issue on June 10, 1994. The brochure will
include 20 pages with a glossy, full color, seventy-weight outer cover, and glossy, seventy-
weight interior pages. Services provided will include design, camera ready art work, type
setting layout, final printing, and delivery to the U.S. Post Office for bulk direct mail delivery.
The proposals, including sales tax, were submitted as follows:
1. Graphics Unlimited
20,893.00
2. Toadly Graphics $ 20,994.00
3. Maurice Printers $ 26,047.48
It is staff's recommendation to award contract to Graphics Unlimited as the lowest, qualified
bidder.
FISCAL IMPACT: Cost to produce two (2) issues of the Recreation Brochure will not
exceed $20,893.00. Unencumbered funds exist in account #190-180-999-5222.
R:/DIAItadad~m'd~m~-Rl~ 101293
ITEM
5
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DAVID F. DIXON
OCTOBER 26, 1993
CONTRACT AMENDMENT - CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE,
INC.
PREPARED BY:
Bruce A. Hartley, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
Amend contract with California Landscape, Inc. for landscape maintenance services,
to include John Magee Park, Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park, and the Medians Service
Area.
DISCUSSION: John Magee Park and Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park were
built and dedicated to the City by the Presley Company. These two parks are
neighborhood parks and will be maintained by California Landscape, Inc., the current
contractor for neighborhood park maintenance. The Medians Service Area will be
added to California Landscape's contract following a resubmittal of prices by the
City's existing landscape contractors, in which California Landscape was the low
bidder.
FISCAL IMPACT: The addition of the two new parks will increase the monthly
landscape contract amount by $3702.44. This amount has been included in the
1993-94 TCSD budget. Landscape maintenance for the Median Service Area will cost
475.00 per month. Sufficient funds exist in Service Level "A" for median
maintenance.
3b~mg~ntlmen.mgn
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
The Agreement dated Mav 11, 1993, between the City of Temecula, and
California Landscape, Inc. (hereinaftet'referred to as "Agreement") is hereby
amended as follows:
RE: Landscape Maintenance Services
Section 1
Term of the Agreement is extended through June 30, 1995.
Section 2
The Scope of Work is hereby amended by adding the following:
Landscape Maintenance Services per City of Temecula Specifications for the following
areas: John Magee Park {Sept. 1, 1993 thru June 30. 1995). Medians Service Area
(Nov. 1.1993 thru June 30. 1995). and Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park {Nov. 1,
1993 thru June 30, 1995).
Section 3
Compensation for services shall be total compensation of all services described in the
Amendment and shall be payable monthly not to exceed 9376.13 for John Magee
Park, 9475.00 for Medians Service Area, and 93,326.31 for Kent Hintergardt
Memorial Park.
Section 4
All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same.
The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above written.
CONTRACTOR
By: By:
California Landscape, Inc.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY OF TEMECULA
Patricia H. Birdsall, President
Board of Directors
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
3b~contrect~c, al,¢on
ITEM NO. 6
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER
OCTOBER 26, 1993
CONTRACT AMENDMENT-EXCEL LANDSCAPE
PREPARED BY:
Bruce A. Hartley
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
Amend the contract for landscape maintenance services with Excel Landscape to
include the addition of Slope Service Area"A".
DISCUSSION: The group of slopes that make up Slope Service Area "A"
were rebid to the existing City landscape contractors following the voluntary
termination of the contract by Fallbrook Landscape. Excel Landscape submitted the
lowest bid for landscape maintenance services for this service area. The remaining
two Slope Service Areas are currently being maintained by Excel Landscape as well.
FISAL IMPACT: The cost for this service area will be $4295.00 per month.
Sufficient funds exist in Service Level "C" for landscape maintenance services for this'
slope area.
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
The Agreement dated May 11, 1993, be~'ween the City of Temecula, and Excel
Landscape (J & R Landscape), (hereinafter referred to as "Agreement") is hereby
amended as follows:
RE: Landscape Maintenance Services
Section 1
Term of the Agreement is extended through June 30, 1995.
Section 2
The Scope of Work is hereby amended by adding the following:
Landscape Maintenance Services per City of Temecula Specifications for the following
area: Slope Service Area "A". This includes the following sites: Winchester Creek,
Woodcrest Country, Saddlewood/Pavilion Pointe, Martinique.
Section 3
Compensation for services shall be total compensation of all services described in the
Amendment and shall be payable monthly not to exceed $4,295.00.
Section 4
All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same.
The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above written.
CONTRACTOR
By: By:
Excel Landscape (J & R Landscape)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY OF TEMECULA
Patricia H. Birdsall, President
Board of Directors
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
3b~ontraet%e~cei.emn
ITEM
NO.
7
CITY ~TTORNEY
FINI~CE OFFICER
CITY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FROM:
DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER
DATE:
OCTOBER 26, 1993
SUBJECT:
FLOOD CONTROL CONSIDERATION - NORTHWEST
SPORTS COMPLEX
PREPARED BY:
SHAWN D. NELSON, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
Receive and file report concerning the feasibility of utilizing the Northwest Sports
Complex for recreation and flood retention purposes.
DISCUSSION: On October 13, 1993, staff met with representatives from
Riverside County Flood Control to discuss the feasibility of utilizing the Northwest
Sports Complex as a flood retention area as well as a park for recreation purposes.
A total of 200 acres of property adjacent to Murrieta Creek for flood retention, north
of Winchester Road, would be required to reduce water flow by 13,000 cubit feet per
second. The purpose of providing this retention area would eliminate the need to
install concrete lining along the creek south of Rancho California Road, adjacent to Old
Town in Temecula. This approach has been viewed favorably by Riverside County
Flood Control and URGE.
According to Frank Peairs from Flood Control, a preliminary plan concerning the
Murrieta Creek improvements and the related affect to the Northwest Sport Complex
will be completed within the next 90 days. Once the preliminary plan is completed,
the City could begin a master plan for the Northwest Sports Complex that would
integrate with the flood control plan. It was agreed by Flood Control and City staff
that the potential existed for joint uses of recreation and flood retention.
As a result, an analysis will be completed by Markham and Associates to determine
the feasibility of utilizing the site for joint uses. This analysis will address the
topography, flow lines, drainage concerns, and preliminary flood control plans. The
results of this report will be completed within the next 90 days and forwarded to the
Board of Directors.
FISCAL IMPACT: Cost associated with constructing the Northwest
Sports Complex will be included in the design and construction bids for this project.
However, potential exists to be reimbursed by Flood Control for all or a portion of the
acquisition costs of the park site or Flood Control could deed additional land adjacent
to the City's existing park site, which could create a larger regional park facility.
ITEM
NO.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
~PROVI~L ~-.
CITY ATTORNEY
FINI~NCE OFFICER
CITY!~I~I~GER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER
OCTOBER 26, 1993
EMERGENCY COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPE PROGRAM
PREPARED BY:
~<~SHAWN D. NELSON, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR
That the Board of Directors:
Approve the implementation of an emergency commercial landscape program
for the City of Temecula.
Appropriate $17,000 from TCSD Service Level "C" Fund Balance to account
//190-180-999-5240 to provide minimum landscaping services for Crystal
Ridge Business Park.
Authorize City Manager to execute a reimbursement agreement' with Crystal
Ridge Business Park concerning emergency .commercial landscaping services·
RECOMMENDATION:
e
DISCUSSION: On October 12, 1993, the Board of Directors directed staff
to develop an interim landscape program for commercial property owners to maintain
a minimum level of service to preserve existing landscaping on a particular site. Staff
has developed a process that will allow the City to provide interim maintenance
services and ensure that the City recaptures its financial investment.
The recommended process is as follows:
The commercial property owner would request from the City to provide
minimum landscape services during a fiscal year and execute a landscape
agreement with the City· The level and scope of the minimum
maintenance would be agreed to by the commercial property owner and
the City·
On May I st of any fiscal year, the commercial property owner would be
required to reimburse the City for all landscaping and administrative
costs associated with the landscape maintenance or those properties
would be included as a separate rate level in Service Level "C" for the
following fiscal year. '-
The assessment would include the maintenance costs prior to the fiscal
year plus the on-going maintenance costs for the new fiscal year.
With the newly adopted teeter plan, if the City expended funds to provide emergency
maintenance for commercial properties that were not budgeted during a fiscal year, ·
the City would be guaranteed to received full reimbursement costs either from the
property owner by May I st of any fiscal year or assessing the properties through the
TCSD during the following fiscal year cycle.
Also, staff has received a writ-ten request from the Crystal Ridge Business Park to pay
for the water costs only for the landscaping within this site through the remainder of
FY 1993-94. Staff will execute a reimbursement agreement with the property
management company of this commercial development.
FISCAL IMPACT: Costs associated with interim landscaping services that were
not budgeted during a fiscal year would be funded from Fund Balance in Service Level
"C" . However, those costs would be repaid either by the property owner by May 1 st
of any fiscal year or through the assessment process of the following fiscal year.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
i~PPROVI~L
CITY XTTORN~Y
FINI~NCE OFFICER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FROM:
DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER
DATE:
OCTOBER 26, 1993
SUBJECT:
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
PREPARED BY:
SHAWN D. NELSON, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR
Staff has been working with the Temecula Museum Foundation to determine a
permanent location for the Temecula Museum. The Museum Foundation has
requested to construct the museum facility and rehabilitate the church building at Sam
Hicks Monument Park utilizing the $500,000 budgeted in the City's Redevelopment
Agency. In return, the museum will provide access from Moreno Road to the Senior
Center as a part of the project's improvements. Further, the Museum Foundation has
stated that no additional rent monies will be requested from the City if the museum
can be constructed at the park. This item will be considered by the Community
Services Commission on October 11, 1993 and the City Council on October 26,
1993.
The City held a bid opening for Pala Community Park on September 30, 1993. The
award of this bid is scheduled for the Board of Directors on October 26, 1993.
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan was reviewed and approved by the Community
Services and Planning Commissions. The Master Plan will be forwarded for
consideration by the City Council after the General Plan has been adopted.
The Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park located in the Presley Development has nearly
completed the 90 day maintenance period. This park should be dedicated to the City
in November, 1993.
The construction of Paloma Del Sol Park is near completion. This park will consist of
two lighted ballfields with soccer overlays, restroom/snack bar facility, and parking
improvements. This park is expected to be dedicated to the City on November 1,
1993.
Staff is involved in analyzing the feasibility of utilizing the Northwest Sports Complex
for recreation and flood retention purposes. A report will be provided to the City
Council on October 26, 1993.
Phase II of the Community Recreation Center (CRC) Project is moving forward at an
excellent pace. Staff is now working with the CRC Foundation to determine
equipment and furniture needs for the CRC. It is anticipated that the CRC will be
completed in January, 1994.
Staff is in the process of selecting a landscape architect and forming a project
committee comprised of skateboarders and Teen Council members to develop a design
for the skateboarding area. This project will be called the Rancho California Sports
Park Improvement Project.
A pre-construction meeting for the construction of Riverton Park was held on
September 16, 1993, with a Notice to Proceed issued for September 27, 1993.
Construction is now underway with most of grading now completed.
Staff will be meeting with the Temecula Town Association to execute a lease
agreement for the Northwest Sports Complex in the near future. Also, a modification
of the existing park use ordinance will be pursued to address this site as a special use
park.
Staff was able to obtain a right of entry letter from the property owner adjacent to
Loma Linda Park to abate weeds that were on this site. Staff is planning on moving
forward with improving this area once clear title is obtained.
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM
NO.
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDE_VELOPMENT AGENCY
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 1993
A regular meeting of the City of Temeculs Redevelopment Agency was called to order on
Tuesday, September 28, 1993, 8:45 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol
Street, Temecula, California. Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding.
PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Muftoz, Roberts, Stone,
Parks
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, Assistant City Manager Harwood Edvalson,
City Attorney F. Scott Field, City Clerk June S. Greek and Recording Secretary Gail Zigler.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
AGENCY BUSINESS
CombininQ Balance Sheet as of June 30. 1993 and the Statement of Revenues.
Exoenditures and ChanQes in Fund Balance for the Year Ended June 30, 1993
It was moved by Agency Member Mur~oz, seconded by Agency Member Stone to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
1.2
Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1993 and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Year
Ended June 30, 1993.
Appropriate $3,274 for Other Outside Services (legal costs relating to the
Rancho West Apartments) in the Low/Moderate Housing Set Aside Fund·
The motion was carried as follows:
AYES:
5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Roberts, Stone,
Parks
NOES:
0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
RDAMIN09128193 -1 - 10106/93
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'$ REPORT
SEPTEMBER 28, 1993
City Manager David Dixon advised that he, Councilmember Parks end Mayor Muf~oz recently
met with Mel Hirschi to discuss issues relating to the RDA judgement. A report of this
discussion will be presented at the October 12, 1993 meeting.
City Manager Dixon advised there is new legislation which places additional restrictions on the
use of Redevelopment Agency funds and one of these restrictions may preclude the City from
entering into a sales tax sharing agreement with the City of Murrieta.
Councilmember Stone asked for a status report on the purchase offer on the Rancho West
Apartments.
City Manager Dixon said the City has provided RTC with all the information they have required
and has asked the them to respond by October 15, 1993.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Agency Member Roberts, seconded by Agency Member Stone to adjourn at
8:50 P.M.
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency will be held on
Tuesday, October 12, 1993, 8:00 PM, at the Temecula Community Center, 28816,
Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
Chairperson Ronald J. Parks
June S. Greek, 'City Clerk
RDAMIN09128183 -2- 10/0~83