HomeMy WebLinkAbout121493 CC AgendaAGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER - 28816 PUJOL STREET
DECEMBER 14, 1993- 7:00 PM
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will
determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00
PM and may continue all other items on which
additional time is recluired until e future meeting.
All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM
· EXECUTIVESESSION: .~ 5!30: PM .-:. ClOsed SessiOn Of the City Council 'purSuant. to'...'..:
· Government Code"Secti!)n'54956.9(a)~ Ran~ho Shopping .'Center .v. 'City 'of Temecula
· and Pechanga 'Reservation 'v. City .of Temecula, 'and 54956.9(b).
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 93-22
Resolution: No. 93-99
CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor J. Sal Muftoz presiding
Invocation
Pastor John Flahiff, Christ's Church Presbyterian
Flag Salute
Temecula Valley High School Junior ROTC, under the direction
of Col. Steven Price, United States Air Force, Ret.
ROLL CALL:
Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Mu~oz
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Bicycle Safety Poster Contest (4th and 5th Grades)
National Home Care Week
PUBLIC FORUM
This is a portion of the City Council meeting unique to the City of Temecula. At the
meeting held on the second Tuesday of each month, the City Council will devote e
period of time (not to exceed 30 minutes) for the purpose of providing the public with
an opportunity to discuss topics of interest with the Council. The members of the City
Council will respond to questions and may give direction to City staff. The Council is
prohibited, by the provisions of the Brown Act, from taking any official action on any
matter which is not on the agenda. If you desire to speak on any matter which is not
Agenda/121413 I 12/01/13
listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak' form should be filled out and filed with
the City Clerk.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be
made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these
reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
2
Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
2.2
2.3
Approve the minutes of October 26, 1993;
Approve the Minutes of November 9, 1993;
Approve the Minutes of November 23, 1993.
Aeende/121493
3
Resolution Aoorovina List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt a resolution emitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
5
6
Combining Balance Sheets as of Seotember 30. 1993 and Statement of Revenues.
Exoenditures and Changes in Fund Balance. and the Statement of Revenues. Exoenses
and Changes in Retained Earnines for the Three Months Ended Seotember 30. 1993
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheets as of September 30,
1993 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in
Fund Balance, and the Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes
in Retained Earnings for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1993;
4.2
Appropriate $63,810 in Account 001-140-999-5248 "Consulting
Services" to pay a 15% fee for a $425,397 sales tax recovery.
4.3
Appropriate $75,000 to Account 001-199-999-5610 "Equipment" for
the purchase of video equipment to be located at the Community
Recreation Center.
Travel Policy
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
Receive and file travel policy.
Award of Vehicle Purchase
(Continued from the meeting of 11/23/93)
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Award the purchase of the vehicle to Schumacher Auto Sales. The purchase
price is $12,582.15, excluding tax.
· ~kgenda/121413 3 12/01/93
Acceot Public Improvements in Tract No. 22627-F
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
Accept the 'Public Improvements in Tract No. 22627-F;
Authorize the reduction of Faithful Performance Street, and Sewer and
Water System Securities;
Accept the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond riders;
Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and surety.
8
9
10
Contract Chanoe Orders No. 30 throuoh No. 35 for Ynez Road Widening Proiect.
PW92-05. CFD 88-12
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
Approve Contract Change Order No. 30 through No. 35 for Ynez Road
Widening Project, PW92-05 for labor and equipment for various items
of work, in the amount of $12,080.95.
Contract Amendment No. 1 to the Land Survevina Portion of the Professional Services
Contracts for Civil Enoineering. Land Survevino, Structural Engineerino, and Soils
Testino - Liefer Road Crossing (PW93-02)
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1
Approve Contract Amendment No. I to provide additional land surveying
services for Liefer Road Crossing by NBS/Lowry Land Surveyors in the
amount of $1,895.00.
Liefer Road BridQe and Street Improvements Reimbursement Aoreement with the
Rancho California Water District for the Reconstruction of the 12-Inch Water Main
(PW93-02)
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1
Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the reimbursement agreement
with the Rancho California Water District for improvements in the
amount of $20,500 to be constructed by the City's Contractor for the
Liefer Road Bridge and Street Improvements Project (PW93-02).
,a~gendd12t483 4
11 1994 Balloon end Wine Festival
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Approve the City's participation in the 1994 Balloon and Wine Festival.
The City of Temecula's participation will be in the amount of $10,000
for advertisement in the official program.
12 Senior Center Comoletion Costs
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Approve an additional appropriation of funds to apply to Senior Center
Project PW92-03 in the amount of $24,500 to cover unanticipated costs
incurred in completing the project.
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
13
Second Reading of Ordinance 93-19 RegardinQ Park Facility Use
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1
Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-19
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING PARK AND RECREATIONAL FACILITY POLICIES AND
REGULATIONS ESTABLISHING GENERAL OPERATION POLICIES GOVERNING
SPECIAL USE PARKS, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 91-37
14
Second ReadinQ of Ordinance 93-21
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1
Establishing Soeed Limits on Certain Streets
Adopt an ordinance entitled;
ORDINANCE NO. 93-21
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
AMENDING SECTION 12.02.010 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS
Aeende/121493 6 12/01/I,1
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before e public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the
approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences
delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.
15
16
Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE} and the Household Hazardous Waste
Element (HHWE)
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY' OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE FINAL SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENT AND
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT AS PRESCRIBED BY THE
CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1989
Soecific Plan No. 164. Amendment No. 2 (PA93-0145) and Tentative Tract Mao No.
27827 (PA93-0144). Rorioauah
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1
Adopt a Negative Declaration for Specific Plan NO. 164, Amendment
No. 2 (PA93-0145) and Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144),
Roripaugh.
16.2
Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164, AMENDMENT NO. 2 (PA93-0145);
AMENDING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164 TO CHANGE THE ZONING FOR
PLANNING AREAS 7 (22.5 ACRES) AND 8 (10.1 ACRES) FROM VERY HIGH
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (12 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), TO ADD A THREE (3) ACRE
PARK AND ADJUST THE BOUNDARIES BETWEEN PLANNING AREAS 7, 8 AND
9 AND LOCATED ON THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND
NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD
Agende/121483 6
6.3 Adopt a resolution entitled:
17
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164, AMENDMENT NO. 2 AMENDING
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164 (PA93.0145) TO CHANGE THE ZONING FOR
PLANNING AREAS 7 (22.5 ACRES) AND 8 (10.1 ACRES) FROM VERY HIGH
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL {20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (12 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), TO ADD A THREE (3) ACRE
PARK AND ADJUST THE BOUNDARIES BETWEEN PLANNING AREAS 7, 8 AND
9 AND LOCATED ON THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND
NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD
16.4
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 27827 (PA93-0144) TO CREATE
A 162 SINGLE FAMILY LOT SUBDIVISION PLUS A THREE (3) ACRE LOT FOR
A PUBLIC PARK WITHIN PLANNING AREA NO. 7 AND LOCATED ON THE
NORTH WEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY
ROAD
PlanninQ AppliCatiOn No. 93-0179, Amendment No. I - Second unit Permit - ADDeal
Of Conditions of AOOrOVal NO. 31 and 42 (reauirement for the all-weather access to the
second unit- as sDecificallv defined by the Deoartment of Public Works)
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
UPHOLDING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0179, AMENDMENT NO. 1, A PROPOSAL
TO CONSTRUCT A SECOND UNIT ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 5.23 ACRES
LOCATED AT 31550 CALLE GIRASOL AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NO. 914-480-006
/~erda/1214 e3 7 1 ~ol/e3
Disoosition and Development Agreement Between the Redevelooment Aoencv - City
of Temecula and the Donna L. Reeves Trust U.T.D. 7-25-93
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING A DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, A PROPERTY
EXCHANGE AGREEMENT AND A LEASE BY AND BETWEEN THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE DONNA L.
REEVES TRUST U.T.D. 7-25-90
19
Use of Redevelooment Bond Proceeds for Construction of Citv Administrative Offices
and Coroorate Yard
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1
Adopt a resolution emitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING THE EXPENDITURE OF TAX INCREMENT FUNDS BY THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES AND A CORPORATION
YARD NORTH OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND WEST OF DIAZ ROAD
COUNCIL BUSINESS
Election of Mayor
2O
21
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1
The Mayor will entertain motions from the City Councilmembers to
select the Mayor to preside until the end of calendar year 1994.
Election of Mayor Pro Temoore
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1
The Mayor will entertain motions from the City Councilmembers to
select the Mayor Pro Tempore who will assume the duties of the Mayor
in the Mayor's absence and will hold this office until the end of calendar
year 1994.
Ageride/121493 8 1 W01/93
22
Reauest for Fee Waiver for Rod Run 1994 - Old Town Merchants Association
RECOMMENDATION:
22.1 Consider request from Old Town Merchants Association to waive fees
for 1994 Rod Run. (Verbal Presentation)
23
24
25
Uroencv Ordinance to Allow Property Clearance for Fire Protection Purooses
RECOMMENDATION:
23.1
Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA PERMITTING CLEARING OF BRUSH FOR FIRE PROTECTION
PURPOSES
Consideration of Settlement Agreement - McDowell vs. City of Temecula
RECOMMENDATION:
24.1 Consider aiDproving the settlement agreement in the action entitled City
of Temecula v. McDowell in the amount of $1,760,422.15.
Discussion of Sian Ordinance
(Verbal Presentation)
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: January 11, 1994, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816
Pujol Street, Temecula, California
,Ageadd121403 I 1.~01/93
TEMECULA ·COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING - ~o be held at
CALL TO ORDER:
President Patricia H. Birdsall
ROLL CALL:
DIRECTORS:
Muf~oz, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Direct(~rs, should
present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state
your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Combininq Balance Sheet as of Seotember 30. 1993 and Statement of Revenues,
Exoenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Three Months Ended Seotember 30.
1~193
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30,
1993 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in
Fund Balance for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1993.
2 Solicitation of Construction Bids for the Soorts Park Slooe ReDair Project (PW93-06)
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the
Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the
Sports Park Slope Repair Project (PW93-06).
3
Award of Professional Services Contract for Materials Testinq Durino the Construction
of Pala Community Park (PW93-O3CSD)
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Award a Professional Services Contract to Geotechnical &
Environmental Engineers, Inc. (GEE) to provide material testing services
during the construction of Pala Community Park, Project No. PW93-
03CSD, in the amount not to exceed $21,210 and authorize the
President to execute the contract.
/i~ende/t21413 10 12~1/15
DISTRICT BUSINESS
4 Election of President
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Conduct election of TCSD President to preside until the end of calendar
year 1994.
5 Election of Vice President
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Conduct election of TCSD Vice President to preside until the end of
calendar year 1994.
Loma Linda Park Imorovements - Phase II
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Appropriate $225,000 from Quimby Fees to the Capital Projects
Account for the construction of Loma Linda Park - Phase II.
6
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Dixon
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT:
Next regular meeting: January 11, 1994, 8:00 PM, Temecula
Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
AOeml~/121493 11 12/01/93
TEMECgLA ':' ' AGENCY :': ' · :.'
· REDEVELOPMENT: MEETING .' ~, ;:~; .:.
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding
ROLL CALL:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Birdsall, Mufioz, Roberrs, Stone, Parks
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present e
completed pink "Request to Speak' to the City Clerk. When you
are called to speak, please come forward and state your name
and address for the record.
AGENCY BUSINESS
1 Election of Chairoerson
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
The Chairperson will entertain motions from the members of the
Redevelopment Agency to select the Chairperson to preside until the
end of calendar year 1994.
2 Election of Vice Chairperson
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
The Chairman will entertain motions from the Redevelopment Agency
Members to select the Vice Chairperson who will assume the duties of
the Chairperson in his/her absence and will hold this office until the end
of calendar year 1994.
3
Combining Balance Sheet as of Seotember 30. 1993 and Statement of Revenues,
Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Three Months Ended Seotember 30.
1993
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30,
1993 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in
Fund Balance for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1993.
/~eek/121495 12 12A)1/13
PUBLIC HEARINGS
4
DiSpositiOn and DeveloPment Aareement. Property Exchanae and Lease Aoreement by
and between the Redevelooment Aoencv of the City of Temecula and the Donna L.
Reeves Trust UTD 7-25-90 for the Properties Located at 27500 Jefferson Road and
~6744 Ynez Road
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Approve the Resolution approving the Disposition and Development
Agreement, the § 031 Exchange Agreement, the Lease Agreement
between the Agency and Reeves regarding the properties located at
27500 Jefferson Road and 26755 Ynez Road, subject to approval by
the General Counsel as to the final form of the Agreements.
Use of RedeveloDment Bond Proceeds for Construction of City Administrative Offices
and CorPorate Yard
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROPRIATING $7 MILLION DOLLARS FROM THE SERIES 1993
TAX ALLOCATION BONDS TO BE USED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CITY
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES AND A CORPORATION YARD NORTH OF
WINCHESTER ROAD AND WEST OF DIAZ ROAD
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting: January 11, 1994, 8:00 PM, Temecula
Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
Agenda/121493 13 12/01/93
PRESENTATIONS\
PROCLAMATIONS
The City of Tetnecula
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, National Home Care Week is an annual celebration that focuses public
attention on the home care needs of young children, the elderly and their famih'es; and
WHEUEAS, National Home Care Week is sponsored by the California Association for
Health Services at Home for persons with acute or long-term health care needs; and
WI:H~, the goal of the week is to build public understanding to the importance of
home care services in a time when health care reform is shifting patient care to the home; and
NOW, THEREFORE, I, J. Sal Mu~oz, on behalf of the City Council of the City of
Temecula, hereby proclaim the week of November 28th through December 4th, 1993 to be
"NATIONAL HOME CARE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City
of Temecula to be affixed this 2nd day of December, 1993.
J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ITEM
1
ITEM
NO.
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 26, 1993
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order on Tuesday,
October 26, 1993, 7:20 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street,
Temecula, California. Mayor J. Sal Mufioz presiding.
PRESENT: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Robarts, Stone,
Muf~oz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, Assistant City Manager Harwood Edvalson,
City Attorney Scott F. Field, City Clerk June S. Greek and Recording Secretary Gail Zigler.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:40 P.M. Pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9(a), Dawes v. City of Temecula, 54956.9(b), and Section
54956.8 (Real property negotiation with Honda of Temecula for the property located at
27500 Jefferson, and Bank of America for property located North of Winchester and West
of Diaz, within Tract 21383. It was moved by Counciimember Parks, seconded by
Councilmember Stone to adjourn to Executive Session at 5:41 P.M. The motion was
unanimously carried.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor Dan Hoekstra of the Discovery Christian Church.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Cub Scout Pack No. 301 led the Flag Salute.
PRESENTATIONS/
PRESENTATIONS
Mayor Mur~oz proclaimed the month of November, 1993, as "Shop Temecula First" month.
The proclamation was presented to Tom Parady on behalf of the Tamecula Chamber of
Commerce.
Mr. Parady provided an overview of the "Shop Temecula First" promotion.
Mayor Mur~oz proclaimed the week of October 23, 1993 to October 31, 1993 as Red Ribbon
Week. The proclamation was accepted by Paul Colaluce on behalf of the Temecula Valley
Unified School District and the Temecula Community Partnership. Mr. Colaluca presented the
Council with literature that will be distributed to the students in the schools and outlined the
activities during Red Ribbon Week.
CCM IN 10/26/93 - 1 - 11/02/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 96, 1993
Leigh Engdahl of the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce introduced Miss Teen Temecula
Josie Bangader; Miss Temecula Naomi Fink; and Mrs. Temecula Christy Cohen.
City Clerk June S. Greek administered the oath of office to Public/Traffic Safety Commissioner
Charles Coe.
A plaque was presented to Jeff Comerchero, recently appointed as Commissioner to the
Community Services Commission.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Stone presented the idea of a hi-monthly newsletter to be distributed to those
individuals, companies or organizations who have previously shown interest in the City of
Temecula by requesting a promotional package. City Manager Dixon agreed that this program
could be implemented within the current promotion plan.
Councilmember Parks advised the Council he attended · seminar on developing livable cities
and obtained information he would like to share with staff and the City Council. Additionally,
he said he attended the Transcon 2000 seminar relating to the Bullet Train, clean air vehicles
and the AQMD (clean air and vehicle) goals and objectives and offered to share this
information with staff and the City Council.
Councilmember Parks expressed his appreciation for the work done by all the City of
Temecula Commissioners.
Councilmember Parks suggested the Council schedule a joint meeting with the City of Murrieta
to discuss the Santa Margarita watershed.
Mayor Mur~oz said he would like to see the City of Temecula make an effort to purchase
electric vehicles when there is a need to purchase new vehicles.
Councilmember Parks said he attended a seminar discussing fuel cells, an industry he feels
the City should encourage to move to Temecula.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Stone removed Items No. 3, 5 and 13 from Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Parks removed Item No. 14 from Consent Calendar.
Mayor Mur~oz advised staff has requested continuance of Item No. 8.
CCMIN 10126/93 -2- 11/02/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBFR 96, 1993
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve
Consent Calendar Items No. 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 9 - 12 and 15, continuing Item No. 8.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Mui~oz
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of September 21, 1993;
2.2 Approve the minutes of September 27, 1993;
2.3 Approve the minutes of September 28, 1993·
City Treasurer's Report
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's report as of August 31, 1993·
Award Contract to Construct Additional 24" Corruoated Metal Pioe Located at 98841
Valleio
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Award a contract for construction and installation of an additional 24"
Corrugated Metal Pipe (CMP) culvert in the public right of way at 28841
Vallejo to Monteleone Excavating, the lowest responsible bidder for the
sum of $12,400.
CCMIN 10/26/93 -3- 11/02/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 26, 1993 ~
10.
Solid Waste Source Reduction and Recvclino Element and Household Hazardous Waste
Element
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
Accept the final draft of the Source Reduction and Recycling Element
(SRRE) and the Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE) as
required by the California Integrated Waste Management Act {AB 939);
7.2
Set December 14, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. at 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula,
CA as the time and place to conduct a public hearing to consider
testimony on the SRRE and HHWE;
7.3
Direct the City Clerk to publish the attached Notice of Public Hearing in
the appropriate publication(s), with at least 30 days notice given prior
to the date set for public hearing.
7.4
Direct staff to submit copies of the final SRRE and HHWE to the
Riverside County Solid Waste Management Advisory Council Local Task
Force for review at least 30 days prior to the date set for public hearing.
Adoorion of Travel Policv
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
Continue to the meeting of November 9, 1993.
Records Destruction Aooroval
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1
Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the
City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
Contract Amendment No. 1 to Professional Services Contract for Civil Enaineerina,
Land Surveving. Structural Enaineerina, and Soils Testing - Liefar Road Crossing (PW
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1
Approve Contract Amendment No. I to provide additional structural
engineering services for Liefar Road crossing by McDaniel Engineering
Company, Inc. in the amount of $3,000.00.
CCMIN 10126193 -4- 11/02/93
CITY COUNCIl MINUTES
11.
12.
13.
m
Rencho California Water District Easement for Proiect
Community Park
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1
11.2
OCTOBFR 96. 1993
No, PW93-03 CSD Pale
Approve the Rancho California Water District easement for the Pale
Community Park and authorize the Mayor to execute the document,
Direct the City Clerk to execute and record the easement document.
Comoletion and Acceotance of Traffic Sional Imorovements at Margarita Road and La
Serene Way, Proiect No, PW92-06
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1
12.2
12.3
Accept the Traffic Signal Construction at Margarita Road and La Serene
Way, Project No. PW92-06, as complete and direct the City Clerk to:
File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept
a six (6) month Maintenance Bond in accordance with Caltrans
standards in the amount of 10% of the contract;
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing
· of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
Selection of Teleohone System for the Community Recreation Center
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1
Authorize the purchase of the telephone system for the Community
Recreation Center from Digital Communications, Inc. in the amount of
$25,955.
13.2
Appropriate $19,955 from the General Fund Unreserved Fund Balance
to account number 001-199-999-5603.
Resolution Aoorovina List of Demands
Councilmember Stone ~luestioned why invoices for legal fees for the months of July
and August are included.
Finance Officer Mary Jane McLarney explained that the Accounts Payable Clerk
reviews the invoice each month and re-calculates the totals. If there is a discrepancy
the invoice is returned to the law firm for corrections.
CCM IN 10/26/93 -6- 11/02/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
e
OCTOBFR .:~6, 1993
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve
staff recommendation as follows:
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt a' resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-83
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall,
Mufloz
None
None
Parks, Roberts, Stone,
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
Memorandum of Understanding ReoardinQ Annexation of Johnson Ranch
Councilmember Stone expressed a concern there are fees waived on this proposal.
Planning Director Gary Thornhill explained the benefits of entering into a Memorandum
of Understanding for this property. He stated the applicant has deposited $5,000 and
an additional $45,000 will be deposited. Director Thornhill said he feels it is important
for the City to control the land use on this property rather than the County.
Mayor Mu~oz asked if there was any fiscal benefit to the City.
Finance Officer Mary Jane McLarney said staff is in the process of completing the
fiscal impact report at this time.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve
staff recommendation as follows:
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Memorandum of Understanding between the Johnson
Machinery Company and the City of Temecula.
5.1
CCMIN10/26/93 -6- 1 t/02/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBI=R .~6. 1993
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs, Stone,
Muf~oz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
13.
Contract Change Orders No. 21 through 26 for Ynez Road Widening Proiect. PWg~-05.
CFD 88-12
Councilmember Stone expressed concern regarding the continued cost overruns on this
project. Councilmember Stone suggested that during the bid process staff investigate
a contractor's past history regarding cost overruns prior to awarding the contract to
low bidder. He said Items No. 23 and No. 24 were of particular concern.
Public Works Engineer Ray Casey advised both Item No. 23 and No. 24 were not
shown to be relocated on the plan. Mr. Casey said a project of this size almost always
incurs several change orders and will require several private property improvements.
He advised the Council this project was surveyed over 2 1/2 year ago and many
improvements were not in at that time. Mr. Casey said the project is still within the
15% contingency.
City Manager David Dixon said that contractors are trying to reduce their bids as low
as possible and get as many reimbursements as possible. He said he thought
Councilmember Stone's recommendation was a very good idea.
Ray Casey said staff negotiates each change order with the contractor.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1
Approve Contract Change Orders No. 21 through 26 for Ynez Road
Widening Project, PW92-05 for labor and equipment for various items
of work, in the amount of ~21,495.32.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Muftoz '
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
CCMIN I 0/26193 -7- 11/02/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
None
OCTOBER 96.1993
14.
Contract Amendment No. 5 to Community Facilities District 88-12 Enoineerino
Services Contract with J.F. Davidson Associates. Inc.
Councilmember Parks said this project has been under design for the past 2 1/2 years
and Cal Trans has now changed their specifications. He asked if the City has an
agreement with Cal Trans, and if Cal Trans can make changes once the design has
been completed.
Public Works Engineer Ray Casey said Cal Trans can make any changes they want.
He said staff has been negotiating with Cal Trans and will continue to do so.
Mayor Muf~oz suggested the City of Temecula send a letter to Governor Wilson
regarding this issue.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs to
Approve Contract Amendment No. 5 to provide additional engineering services for CFD
88-12 by J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. for the Winchester Road Interchange
Modifications in the amount of ~97,000.00 and further directed staff To prepare a
letter for the Mayor's signature to the Governor and/or the Director of CalTrans
outlining the City's serious concerns regarding the heavy fiscal impacts caused by
mandated changes by CalTrans to existing projects.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Mu~oz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
PUBLIC HEARINGS
16.
Aooeal of Planning Commission ADorevel of PA93-0009. Tentative Parcel MaD 25059.
First Extension of Time and PA93-0010. Plot Plan 34. First Extension of Time -Crvstal
Ridoe
Planning Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report. He said the Conditions of
Approval that were added to the extension of time by the Planning Commission, were
because these conditions are important to public health, safety and welfare and
consistent with the future general plan. Director Thornhill said the applicant feels the
map should get an automatic extension of time under Ordinance 460, however, it is
the opinion of the City Attorney this application does not meet that requirement.
CCMIN 10/26/93 -8- 11/02/13
~-- CITY COUNCIl MINUTES OCTOBFR 96. 1993
Councilmember Parks advised he has previously abstained on this item due to a
previous financial interest, however it has been two years since he had any financial
interest in this property and therefore he will vote on the issue.
Mayor Mufioz opened the public hearing at 8:50 P.M.
Anthony Polo, AveIon Consultants, 43517 Ridge Park Drive, Temecula, representing
the applicant, said he believes since the City has not adopted · general plan it is illegal
to apply conditions to a project based on the draft general plan. As the applicant's
representative, regarding the time extension, he disagreed with the requirements as set
by staff and the city attorney, Additionally, on page 5 of the staff report, Condition
No. 3 regarding a grading permit, he said he believes are over-simplified sections of the
ordinance and they are already covered in depth by the ordinance,
City Attorney Scott Field clarified Condition No. 18 which states the sub-divider is to
participate in, and waives all rights to object to, the formation of an assessment
district, community services district or a fee district providing for the construction of
the corridor.
Councilmember Parks stated an alignment study is being done and when the initial
study was done, the applicant's map showing the plot plan was not available.
City Attorney Field said dedication of property is not required at this time and will take
place at the plot plan stage. Mr. Field explained the map act provision regarding
automatic time extension, He said the sub-divider must spend $125,000 in off-site
improvements and record a final phase map, the recording of the first phase gives him
a extension of thirty-six months to record future phases,
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
RECOMMENDATION: '
16.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-84
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0009, FIRST EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 25059 TO SUBDIVIDE A 5.51 ACRE
PARCEL INTO 4 PARCELS LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF RIDGE PARK
DRIVE APPROXIMATELY 70 FEET SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 945-130-0003
CCMIN 10126/93
/02/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
16.2
17.
OCTOBI:R 96. 1993
Adopt · resolution emitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-85
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0010, FIRST EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR PLOT PLAN NO. 34 TO CONSTRUCT A 102,243 SQUARE FOOT
OFFICE BUILDING, A 7,872 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT, A 7,000 SQUARE
FOOT RESTAURANT AND A FOUR LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE ON A 5.51
ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE
APPROXIMATELY 70 FEET SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 945-130-003
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Vacation of a Portion of Second Street
Birdsall,
Mufioz
None
None
Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Public Works Engineer Ray Casey presented the staff report.
Mayor Muf~oz opened the public hearing at 9:10 P.M. There being no requests to
speak to this matter, the public hearing was closed at 9:11 P.M.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve
staff recommendation as follows:
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-86
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF SECOND STREET
SOUTHWESTERLY OF FRONT STREET PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY PROVIDED
BY CHAPTER 3, PART 3, DIVISION 9 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS
CODE
CCM IN 10/26/93 - 1 O- 11/02/93
--- OCTOB;R ~6, 1993
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs, Stone,
Muftoz
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Councilmember Birdsall asked staff to carefully consider closing streets and alleys on
any future recommendations dealing with the Old Town area.
Public Works Engineer Ray Casey stated the property owners involved were in
concurrence with the recommendation.
Planning Director Gary Thornhill said staff has ensured the recommendation will not
compromise the goals and objectives of the Specific Plan.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
19. Prooosed Skateboard Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Receive report and provide direction to staff to I~repare a skateboard
ordinance.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
continue this item to the meeting of November 9, 1993.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
20.
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
Temecula Museum
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1
Birdsall,
Mu~oz
None
None
Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Approve the modification and amendment of the City's land lease of
Sam Hicks Monument Park with the Old Town Temecula Historical
Museum Foundation.
CCMIN 10/26/93 - 11 - 11/02/83
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
20.2
21.
24.
CCMINlOI26/93
20.3
OCTOBER 96. 1993
Appoint two members to serve on a Project Committee for the Sam
Hicks Monument Park Improvement Project.
Authorize City staff to set a public hearing and prepare the agreements
necessary to provide the Old Town Temecula Historical Museum
Foundation with ~500,000 in Redevelopment funding to improve the
existing church facility and construct a new museum facility.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
continue this item to the meeting of November 9, 1993.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall,
Mufloz
None
None
Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Discussion of Chanoes in Plannine Procedures and Public Notice Reauirements -
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1 Provide direction to staff.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
continue this item to the meeting of November 9, 1993.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall,
Muftoz
None
None
Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Plannine Director's Report on Pechanga Resort/Casino
(Placed on the agenda at the request of Mayor Mur~oz)
A verbal presentation by Director of Planning Gary Thornhill.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
continue this item to the meeting of November 9, 1993 with a written report to be
-12- 11102/93
OCTOBER ~6, 1993
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
presented by the Planning Director.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall,
Mu~oz
None
None
Parks, Roberts, Stone,
23.
22.
Old Town Temecula Merchants Association Reouest for Fundino
Due to a potential conflict of interest involving three Councilmembers, they were
required to draw straws. Mayor Muf~oz and Councilmember Birdsall stepped down.
City Manager David Dixon presented the staff report outlining the request by the Old
Town Merchants Association to fund $24,000 to cover the advertising on a billboard
which promotes Old Town.
Robert Lord, 30120 Pechanga Drive, Property Manager for Butterfield Square and
Treasurer of the Old Town Merchants Association, expressed support of the billboard
sign and asked the Council to support two billboards for Old Town.
Frank Spencer, president of the Merchants Association, asked for the Council's
support of the request.
Chuck Pagu, 41881 5th Street, Temecula, speaking as a resident of Old Town asked
the Council to approve the request for funding of the Old Town billboard.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve
$12,000 for six months rent on the Old Town billboard.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Parks, Roberts, Stone
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Mufioz
Public/Traffic Safetv Commission Ordinance Amendment
CCMIN 10/26/93 - 13- 11/02/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 96, 1993
Public Works Engineer Ray Casey presented the staff report.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts advised the Council the Public/Traffic Safety Commission
unanimously concurred with the recommendation.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
RECOMMENDATION:
22.1 Introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-18
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING CHAPTER 12.01 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING
TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY
COMMISSION
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Mufioz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
18. General Plan Adoorion
Senior Planner John Meyer explained that after meeting with the School District and
representatives of Kemper Development to discuss the school facilities policies, the
School District and Kemper Development have agreed to revised language, presented
by the City Attorney, regarding these policies.
The Council approved the proposed language by consensus.
Mr. Meyer explained that in response to recent Council action, staff has re-evaluated
the land use designation for the WaI-Mart site, which was originally shown as
professional office on the draft general plan dated July 22, 1992. He said during the
public hearing process in the fall of 1992, the Planning Commission made no changes
to this designation. In the February 1993, staff received a letter from the property
owner's representative requesting a change of the land use designation to community
commercial. At the June 1993 meeting the City Council tentatively approved the
applicant's request and changed the draft land use designation from professional office
CCMINlOI26/93 -14- 11/02/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 96, 1993
to community commercial. At the July, 1993 meeting staff approved an E.I.R. Based
on the recommendation by the Council, staff is recommending the land use remain
professional office.
Councilmember Stone questioned the length of time before the property could be
designated commercial.
City Attorney Scott Field said it would require · general plan amendment to designate
the property commercial.
City Manager David Dixon clarified the zoning could be changed to commercial but not
the same commercial designation for a period of one year.
Gary Thornhill said staff is making this recommendation in response to the Council's
direction in re-zoning the property. Mr. Thornhill said although the commercial
designation would be the preferred land use, the professional office designation could
be consistent with the Council's action.
Councilmember Birdsall said she has a problem applying the professional office
designation to support the Mello-Roos tax along this corridor. Councilmember Birdsall
said this property has been considered commercial since incorporation of the City.
City Manager Dixon said there is still specific zoning set aside on the specific plan for
a regional center.
Mayor Mur~oz said staff is making the recommendation for professional office based
on the very specific detailed discussion the Council held in closed door session which
the Council supports. He said this is the recommendation of the City Attorney and
staff is reacting to that and the Council must support staff.
Mayor Mufioz opened the public hearing at 10:00 P.M.
Brian Noreen, General Manager of Kemper Real Estate, 30381 Red River Circle,
Temecula, said he is not sure who has made the recommendation of professional
office. Mr. Noreen explained the subject parcel is part of Specific Plan 263 which
Kemper staff has been considering and discussing with City staff for the past few
years. He said City staff was supporting the commercial designation during
discussions, and without notifying Kemper Real Estate, they have decided on the
professional office designation without notifying Kem per of the recommendation before
the Council tonight.
Mayor Muftoz suggested the Council consider recessing to a closed door session.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Stone to
extend the meeting from 10:15 P.M. to 11:00 P.M.
CCMIN 10/26193 - 15- 11/02/83
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBI=R ~6. 1993 --~
The motion was carried as follows:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Muftoz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to recess
to a closed door session Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a).
The motion was carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Mu~oz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Mayor Mur~oz reconvened the meeting at 10:55 P.M.
He advised the consensus of the Council was to continue this element of the General
Plan for two weeks.
Sam Alhadaff, attorney representing the applicant, stated for the record, the applicant
would object to any future closed door sessions with regard to the General Plan.
Senior Planner John Meyer summarized the remaining elements of the General Plan.
Councilmember Parks asked for clarification of staff's recommendation for the access
to the high school on Winchester Road.
Mr. Meyer said there was discussion on whether or not the Nicolas Road extension
provided any reduction in congestion on Winchester Road and the traffic model
indicates without the North General Kearney link this particular link does not provide
any significant reduction on Winchester Road. It will provide additional access to the
high school, however the most efficient access would be to have it cross Santa
Gertrudis Creek.
Councilmember Parks recommended the Nicolas Road extension, across the creek, be
removed from the circulation element and show an access point to the high school.
The Council agreed by consensus.
CCM IN 10/26/93 - 16- 11/02/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 96. 1993
Senior Planner John Meyer provided a staff report on the Chaparral area. He said there
were several changes, one of significance recommending low density designation and
reducing the area that would be considered the chaparral area and taking it out of the
special study overlay.
The Council approved by consensus with Councilmember Stone and Councilmember
Parks abstaining due to a conflict of interest.
Tom Rodgers, 35270 Calla Nopel, Temecula, representing Nissan of Temecula, stated
the dealership is currently on a parcel which has a request for change to Business
Professional (BP). Mr. Rodgers expressed concern that auto dealerships are not
permitted under the BP designation.
Larry Markham, Markham and Associates, 41750 Winchester Road, Temecula,
representing the property owner, explained the property to the North and the East are
zoned Industrial Professional (IP) and the closest General Ran designation is BP. Mr.
Markham said the property owner intends to incorporate these in the overall plan. The
BP designation in the General Plan could be implemented in the proposed light
industrial zone.
Senior Planner John Meyer recommended the Council continue this item for two weeks
to allow staff to review and bring back a recommendation.
The Council agreed by consensus to continue this item for two weeks.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to extend
the meeting to 11:30 P.M.'
The Council reviewed and approved by consensus the Growth Management and Public
Facilities, Circulation, Community Design Elements and the Revisions Addendum as
presented and recommending continuing the Land Use Element and the EIR to the
meeting of 11/9/93 by consensus.
25.
CCMIN 10126/93
Discussion of Prooosition No. 172
Councilmember Parks expressed the importance of Proposition No. '172 passing to
ensure the City there will be funds to man the jail and for the District Attorney to
prosecute the criminals.
Mayor Pro Tam Robarts concurred.
Mayor Mur~oz agreed with the need for the funds, however he feels there is no
guarantee the funds will come to the City.
City Manager David Dixon said after reviewing the legislation, he understands the
-~7- H/oam3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
funds will go into s County wide pool of funds.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
None
CITY MANAGER REPORT
None
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
None
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Stone to adjourn at
11:30 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried.
The next regular meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on Tuesday, November 9,
1993, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California.
OCTOBFR 96. 1993
ATTEST:
Mayor J. Sal Mu~oz
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CCMIN 10126193 - 18- 11/02/93
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD NOVEMBER 9, 1993
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:21 PM at the
Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. Mayor J. Sal Muf~oz
presiding.
PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts,
Stone, Mu~oz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, Assistant City Manager Harwood Edvslson,
City Attorney Scott F. Field and City Clerk June S. Greek.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
A meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:00 PM. It was moved by
Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to adjourn to Executive Session
pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b) to discuss pending litigation. The motion
was unanimously carried.
The meeting was reconvened at 7:21 PM in regular session with all members present.
City Attorney Field announced that the City Council met in Executive Session regarding Real
Property Negotiations regarding Honda of Temecula.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor George Simmons, Temecula Valley House of Praise.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilmember Birdsall.
PUBLIC FORUM
Richard Moriki, 40445 Carmelita Circle, addressed the Council regarding the proposed
extension of No. General Kearny from Calls Madero to Nicolas Road. He asked that the
residents be kept well informed and given the opportunity for public input.
Councilmember Stone informed Mr. Moriki that no final decision has been made on this issue
and the item has been placed on the agenda for November 23, 1993, and citizens will have
the opportunity for input at that time.
Bernie Thomas, 31525 Ave Del Reposo, representing Meadowview Community Association
Board of Directors, concurred with the request that the extension of No. General Kearny be
placed on the agenda of November 23, 1993 for discussion.
Greg Treadway, 40550 Calle Madero, thanked the Council for placing the proposed extension
of N, General Kearny on the agenda and requested the Council consider Alternate No. 1. He
also addressed the WaI-Mart issue and asked why Kernper had not changed this property to
commercial zoning prior to this point.
Ken Murray, 30660 La Sombra Ct., objected to the speed undulations on Pine Colada and
requested they not be installed on any streets in Meadowview.
Councilmember Stone stated that the speed undulations is a pilot program and Pina Colada
is the test site for this program. He explained that these undulations were requested by the
majority of homeowners on Pine Colade.
Giovanna Mur~oz, 28636 Front Street, #106, addressed the City Council requesting an
investigation be conducted regarding alleged illegal activities targeted against her family. She
read a statement which requested as a starting point to this investigation, John Hunneman,
Ken Dodd of Final Touch Marketing and Doug Davies of Southern California Edison Company
be contacted.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Stone invited citizens to voice their opinions on issues before the City Council
but requested that they do so before action is taken so appropriate measures can be taken.
He stated he is available at City Hall every Tuesday to meet with citizens who have concerns
regarding City issues.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts stated he also has a problem with the decision making process due
to a lack of citizen input, and stated there may be a problem with dissemination of
information.
Mayor Mur~oz suggested running information regarding the agenda on Cable TV.
Councilmember Stone suggested that the Council assign 8 Councilmember to host a
community forum on Monday night prior to the Council Meetings.
Councilmember Birdsall asked the City Clerk to inform the Council and public where the
agenda is currently being posted. City Clerk June Greek stated the agenda is currently being
posted at the Community Center, Post Office, Chamber of Commerce, Library and City Hall.
Councilmember Parks stated the purpose of the Public Forum, which is unique to the City of
Temecula, is to give the public the opportunity to voice their concerns to the City Council.
He said he is also willing to support any other activity that would help to keep the citizens
informed of community issues.
Mayor Mur~oz reported that although the proposed Pechanga Casino does not fall within the
jurisdiction of the City, the Council has asked that appropriate environmental issues and
Minutes% 110993 -2- 11/22/93
Council Minutes November 9, 1993
concerns be addressed, and said that he is meeting with the Pechanga representatives in a
effort to work with these issues.
Mayor Mu~oz also informed the public that a forum will be held at Margarita Middle School,
entitled "The Great Law Debate," on November 11, 1993, to allow discussion between
Attorneys and lay people to discuss the roll of attorneys and the basic distrust of the public,
with Judge Saradarian mediating the debate.
RECESS
Mayor Mur~oz called a recess at 8:13 PM. The meeting was raconvened following the
previously scheduled Community Services District Meeting and the Radevelopment Agency
Meeting at 8:48 PM, with all members present.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts requested correction of s typographical error on page one, Section
1, of Ordinance 93-18.
Councilmember Stone requested that Item No. 14 be removed from the Consent Calendar.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve
Consent Calendar Items 1-13 and 15-18.
The motion was unanimously carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
Minutes
Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Mu~oz
None
None
Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of October 12, 1993.
Minutee%110993 -3- 11122/93
City Council Minutes November 9.1993 ~.
Resolution AoDrovino List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt a resolution emitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-87
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
e
e
City Treasurer's Reoort
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's report as of September 30, 1993.
Council Meetino Holidav Schedule
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Direct staff to take the appropriate steps to notice cancellation of the
meeting of December 28, 1993.
e
Award of Contract for BridQe and Street Imorovements on Liefer Road at Nicolas Road
(Project No. PW 93-02)
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Award a contract for the bridge and street improvements, Project No.
PW93-02, to K.E. Patterson for $167,475.00, and authorize the Mayor
to execute the contract;
6.2
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $16,747.50, which is equal to 10% of the
contract amount.
6.3
Approve an advance from the Development Impact Fund of
$184,222.50 to the Capital Projects Fund.
~---- City Council Minutes November 9, 1993
e
Award of Contract for the Purchase and Installation of a Pre-fabricated Concrete Bridge
at Liefar Road Crossing (Project No. PW93-0t)
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
7.2
Award a contract for the purchase and installation of pre-fabricated
concrete bridge tees, Project No. PW93-02, to Spancrete of California
for $20,650 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract;
7.3
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $2,065 which is equal to 10% of the contract
amount;
Approve an advance from the Development Impact Fund of $22,715 to
Capital Projects Fund.
McGruff Truck ProQram
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
Approve participation in the McGruff Truck decal program and
participation in the City-wide McGruff safety program. Direct staff to
prepare a letter of endorsement of the Temecula Community Partnership
to serve as the umbrella organization and authorize the City Manager to
execute the necessary application for participation.
e
Travel Policy
(Continued from the meeting of 10/26/93)
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Continue to the meeting of November 23, 1993.
10.
Release Faithful Performance Warranty Bond in Tract No. ~ 1764
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Authorize the release of Faithful Performance Warranty Bond for Sewer
System Improvements in Tract No. 21764, and Direct the City Clerk to
so notify the Developer and release the Bond to the Surety.
/~gend~110eS3 I 11/22/13
Citv Council Minutes November 9. 1993 ~
11.
12.
13.
Reduction in Bond Amounts in Tract No. 2~6~7-F
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1
11.2
11.3
Authorize a fifty (50) percent reduction in street, and sewer and water
system Faithful Performance Bond amounts;
Accept the Faithful Performance Bond Riders in the reduced amounts;
Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety.
Comoletion and Acceotance of Grading. Pavino and Site Construction at the Temecula
Senior Center - Proiect No. PW 92-07
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1
Accept the Grading, Paving and Site Construction at the Temecula
Senior Center, Project No. PW92-O7, as complete and direct the City
Clerk to:
File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and
accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10%
of the contract;
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the
filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
Contract Chanae Orders No. 27 through No. 29 for Ynez Road Widening Project. PW
92-05, CFD 88-12
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Approve Contract Change Orders No. 27 through No. 29 for Ynez Road
Widening Project, PW92-05 for labor and equipment for various items
of work, in the amount of $9,371.25.
Ageedd110g13 g 11/22/13
~ City Council Minutes November g. 1993
15.
16.
17.
Used Oil Recvclinf; Block r-rant Program
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF +EMECULA
APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE USED OIL
RECYCLING FUND UNDER THE USED OIL RECYCLING ENHANCEMENT ACT
FOR THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS REGIONAL
USED OIL COLLECTION PROGRAM
PechanQa Casino Status Report
(Continued from the meeting of 10/26/93)
16.1 Receive and file report.
Membership on Develooment Code Advisory Committee
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Re-appoint Dennis Chiniaeff to continue to serve on the Development
Code Advisory Committee.
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
18.
Second Readina of Public/Traffic Safety Commission Ordinance Amendment
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1
Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-18
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING CHAPTER 12°01 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING
TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY
COMMISSION
Agendd1109i3 7 11/22/13
CiW Council Minutes November 9.1993 ~
14.
RiQht-of-Wav Weed Control ProQram for Fiscal Year 1993-94
Councilmember Stone asked since only one bid was received, if the Department
checked to see if this is competitive pricing.
Director of Public Works Tim Serlet stated four companies were contacted, but Pest
Masters has a franchise in Temecula and does not have the travel expense of other
companies. He stated most other cities provide this service in house, however this
contractor does work for CalTrsns and the City of Lake Elsinore. He stated that
various licenses are required to perform this type of service.
Councilmember Stone asked if the City has Qualified people to perform this service in-
house. Mr. Serlet answered that the City does not, at this time, have qualified people
or the man-power to perform these duties.
Mayor Murtoz asked that an "environmentally friendly" approach to this problem be
investigated.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
14.1
Award contract for Fiscal Year 1993-94 Right-of-Way Weed Control
Program to Pestmaster Services, the lowest responsible bidder, for the
sum of $29,250.
The motion was unanimously carried as follows:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Mufioz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
COUNCIL BUSINESS
19. Consideration of Prooosed Skateboard Ordinance
Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report.
Councilmember Parks stated he has received letters of complaint from business owners
regarding skateboarding on private property and asked if the City has received similar
letters.
Director Thornhill stated that he has received letters from business owners in the
Tower Plaza and Palm Plaza regarding the need to address the skateboarding issue.
Aeende/110ee3 I 11/22/13
~ City Council Minutes November 9. 1993
He requested direction from the Council on how they would like staff to proceed. Mr.
Thornhill reported that the Police Department feels skateboarding should be permitted
on all public streets and sidewalks, except as designated by Resolution, and asked if
the Council wishes to enforce regulations on private property.
Mayor Muf~oz stated he has a concern about skateboarding in commercial centers and
asked what staff's position is on this issue.
Mr. Thornhill stated that it is not unusual for cities to prohibit skateboarding in
commercial centers, however, typically cities are most involved with enforcement on
sidewalks and streets.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts stated he does not have a problem with prohibiting
skateboarding on private property if requested by property owners, however he feels
skateboarding should be allowed on public streets and sidewalks.
Councilmember Stone stated he would be against any ordinance prohibiting
skateboarding in public streets and sidewalks, but would like to see an ordinance
addressed to commercial properties at the request of property owners. He stated he
does feel that skateboarding should be prohibited on certain busy streets, such as
,ynez' ,
Councilmember Birdsall asked that this ordinance also address roller blades and roller
skating.
It was approved by consensus to direct staff to prepare an Ordinance that supports
staff recommendation #2, "That prohibits skateboarding on private property in those
areas designate by resolution of the Council. This would require property owners to
petition the City for prohibition of skateboarding for · particular property," and staff
recommendation #3 "That would permit skateboarding on all public streets and/or
public sidewalks except those areas designate by resolution of the City Council" and
further directed that the proposed ordinance will also be drafted to address use in
public parks and will additionally cover roller skates and roller blades.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
¸20.
AOOeal Of Planning Commission Aooroval of Plannine Aoolication No. 93-0158.
Amendment No. 1 - Exoansion to the Existing Temecula Valley Unified School District
Facility in Two Phases
Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report. He stated staff
recommends the addition of new Conditions of Approval Nos. 11, 12, 13, 15 and 17,
with respect to truck deliveries, outside lighting, ingress and egress via the existing
gate, incorporated additional conditions on landscaping to better screen warehouse
facilities and finally required that any storage of hazardous materials be reviewed and
approved by Riverside County Fire and Health Department.
Aoend~110993 I 11/22/13
City Council Minutes , November 9. 1993
Mayor Muf~oz opened the public hearing at 9:21 PM.
Joseph F. Seguin, 41640 Avenida de la Reina, thanked staff for their cooperation in
resolving issues of concern and stated he now concurs with staff recommendation.
Mr. Seguin asked if this property were to change hands, would approvals need to
come back before the City Council.
Mr. Thornhill stated that this permit runs with this particular use and therefore would
become null and void.
Mayor Mufioz closed the public hearing at 9:25 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, Seconded by Mayor Pro Tam Robarts to
approve staff recommendation with the addition of new conditions of approval Nos.
11, 12, 13, 15 and 17 as presented in the amended staff report.
20.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-89
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING
THE APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0158, AMENDMENT NO. 1, AND
APPROVING THE PROJECT TO CONSTRUCT APPROXIMATELY 34,440
SQUARE FEET OF WARE HOUSE SPACE AND 13,824 SQUARE FEET OF
OFFICE SPACE IN TWO PHASES ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 10.94 ACRES
LOCATED AT 31350 RANCHO VISTA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NO. 954-020-002
The motion was unanimously carried.
RECESS
Mayor Mur~oz called a brief recess at 9:25 PM to change the tape. The meeting was
reconvened at 9:27 PM with all members present.
21. General Plan Adoption
Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report, stating two clean-up items are
left with regard to the General Plan, both deal with the Land Use Element. He stated
the first issue concerns the Southeast corner of Winchester and Ynez, commonly
known as the WaI-Mart site. He stated staff recommends that the appropriate land
use designation remain community commercial and that additional language be added
to the text under the specific plan overlay, as outlined in the staff report. He explained
the purpose of this language is to provide comprehensive planning of large areas
without breaking out individual sites.
10993 1 · 11/22/03
---- City Council Minutes November 9. 1993
Councilmember Stone stated he believes the citizens do not want to see this site
commercial at this time and recommended it be designated as Office Professional.
Mayor Muftoz opened the public hearing at 9:35 PM.
Philip Hoxsey, 43318 Cielo De Azul, representing the Citizens Against Tax Subsidies
who brought forward the referendum, stated he does not think it is the intent of
citizens to keep the developer from getting whatever zoning they want for this
property. He stated their intent was to stop the WaI-Mart incentive package, thereby
stopping WaI-Mart.
Councilmember Parks moved staff recommendation, Mayor Pro Tem Roberts seconded
the motion.
Councilmember Birdsall stated this is only a land use designation and it has nothing to
do with zoning as this point.
Mayor Mur%oz stated he supports the designation of Office Professional for this
location. He said he is concerned about the Walmart issue and believes that the public
does not wish to see this corner commercial at this time.
Councilmember Parks stated the Office Commercial is addressed in the Specific Plan
Overlay concept. He stated if that designation were not on the immediate corner of
Winchester and Ynez, he could agree. However, he stated in regards to commercial
property, location is the most important aspect.
Councilmember Birdsall called for the question, Councilmember Parks seconded the
motion. The motion was unanimously carried.
The motion on the floor carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Roberts
NOES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone, Mufioz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Senior Planner John Meyer stated the second land use issue is the Northeast corner
of Solana Way and Ynez Road. He stated upon reviewing existing and potential
development of this area, staff recommends as follows: The North side of Motor Car
Parkway be Business Land Use designation, the South and East portion of Motor Car
Parkway be Service Commercial and the Northeast corner of Solana Way and Ynez
remain Community Commercial. He stated this recommendation is based on
maintaining the commercial character of the parcels and to preserve the existing
commercial center.
Aeende/110883 11 11/22/13
City Council Minutes November 9. 1993 ~-,
Larry Markham, 41750 Winchester Rd, requested that the two vacant parcels which
front on Ynez Road be designated Service Commercial. He stated the property South
of Solana is service commercial and this would be consistent with that use.
Councilmember Parks asked what uses would not be consistent under the community
commercial designation for this parcel. Mr. Markham answered that a used car lot is
not compatible with a community commercial designation.
Mayor Muftoz asked staff if there are any letters on file in objection to the change of
designation in this area. Mr. Meyer stated there is a letter on file from the Temecula
Auto Dealers Association in opposition to a change to service commercial.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts stated he cannot support a service commercial designation for
this parcel.
Councilmember Parks said is supports staff recommendation for this area.
Council consensus was reached to support staff recommendation on this issue.
Mayor Mufioz closed the public hearing at 10:02 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to
approve staff recommendation 21.2, 21.3, 21.4 and 21.5 as follows:
21.2
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-90
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE
GENERAL PLAN AND ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
21.3
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-91
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE CITY
OF TEMECULA
Aeenk/110993 12 11/22/13
~ CiW Council Minutes November 9, 1993
21,4 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-92
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
21.5 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-93
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM FOR THE GENERAL PLAN FOR
THE CITY OF TEMECULA
The motion was unanimously carried.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs to extend the
meeting until 10:30 PM. The motion was unanimously carried.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to continue items
22 and 24 to the next available agenda.
22. Status Reoort on the Detailed Imolementation StrateQv and Regional Air nualitv
ProQrams
24. Discussion of ChanQes in Planning Procedures and Public Notice ReQuirements
The motion was unanimously carried.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
23.
Temecula Museum
Director of Community Service Shawn Nelson presented the staff report and
recommended approval of recommendations 23.2 and 23.3, with continuation of
recommendation 23.1 regarding the amendment of the City's land lease, to a noticed
public hearing.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts asked if any of the Council had a conflict of interest on this
issue. City Attorney Field asked if anyone owned property within 300 feet of this site.
Councilmember Stone stated he owns property within 300 feet. City Attorney Field
directed that Councilmember Stone would need to abstain on this issue.
Aemdd110i83 13 11/22/13
City Council Minutes November 9. 1993
Maxins Bendikson, 412780 Valencia Way, representing the Temecula Valley Museum,
read a statement written by Nancy Maurice. She urged support of staff
recommendation. Ms. Bendikson then introduced the new Board President, Jolene
Cody Pastoor.
Jolene Cody Pastoor, 23903 Via de Gema Linda, representing the Temecula Valley
Museum, urged support of the staff recommendation, stating the museum possesses
an outstanding collection of artifacts, has the potential of becoming an .accredited
museum, and would thereby make a large contribution to the community.
Mayor Mur%oz asked how much money the museum has raised to date. Ms. Bendikson
stated that their first fund raiser netted $8,000, but reported she did not know the
exact total of other monies received.
RECESS
Mayor Mur~oz called a brief recess at 10:27 PM to change the tape. The meeting was
reconvened at 10:28 PM with all members present.
Councilmember Parks stated he is in favor of the proposal because the museum will
serve as an anchor for one end of Old Town.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to
approve staff recommendation 23.2 and 23.3 as follows:
23.2 Appoint Councilmember Birdsall and Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to serve on a
Project Committee for the Sam Hicks Monument Park Improvement Project;
23.3 Authorize City Staff to set a public hearing and prepare the agreements
necessary to provide the Old Town Temecula Historical Museum Foundation
with $500,000 in Redevelopment funding to improve the existing church
facility and construct a new museum facility.
The motion was unanimously carried, with Councilmember Stone abstaining.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to extend the
meeting to 10:45 PM. The motion was unanimously carried.
25. Discussion of Widenino of Maroarita Road from La Serene to Rancho California Road
(Oral Report - Placed on the agenda at the request of Mayor Mur~oz)
Mayor Mur~oz requested that the widening of Margarita Road from La Serene to
Rancho California Road be undertaken immediately, and that staff come back with a
method to secure reimbursement of these costs. He stated · safety issue is present
/~enda/110983 14 I 1/22/93
~ City Council Minute November 9.1993
because two lanes converge into one lane, and this route is commonly used by school
children.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs said he agrees with immediately proceeding with this
improvement. He stated the bike lane has to go around the block because of this
problem and some children do not ~1o this, causing a further safety hazard.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Parks to direct
staff to proceed to contract for the widening of Margarita Road from La Serena Way
to Rancho California Road and to return to the City Council with a recommendation for
methods of reimbursement to the City of the costs.
The motion was unanimously carried.
City Manager Dixon stated that staff will follow the approved bid procedure and hope
that the funding issue will be addressed at the time bids are considered will, otherwise
the City take on the liability, without the firm assurance that the City will be
reimbursed.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
None given.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Mayor
adjourn at 10:37 PM
unanimously carried.
Pro Tem Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Stone to
to the meeting of November 23, 1993. The motion was
J. Sal Mufioz, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
,Aeem~110993 16 11/22/93
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD NOVEMBER 23, 1993
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:09 PM at the
Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. Mayor J. Sal Mur~oz
presiding.
PRESENT 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Muf~oz
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and City Clerk
June S. Greek.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
A meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:40 PM. It was moved by
Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to adjourn to Executive Session
pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Pechanga Reservation v. City of Temecula
and City of Temecula v. McDowell and 54956.9(b). The motion was unanimously carried
with Councilmember Birdsall absent.
The meeting was reconvened at 7:09 PM in regular session with Councilmember Birdsall
absent.
City Attorney Field announced that the City Council met in Executive Session regarding
Kernper v. City of Temecula. He stated that Pechanga Reservation v. City of Temecule was
not discussed.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor James Field, First Baptist Church.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilmember Parks.
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Mayor Mur~oz proclaimed November 21st- November 27th, 1993 to be "California Family
Week". Trudy Thomas accepted the proclamation and thanked that City Council for their
continued support.
Minutes%112393 -1- 12/06/93
Citv Council Minutes November 23. 1993 ~-,
Mayor Muftoz presented Dennis Chinaeff with a certificate of appreciation for his dedicated
service to the Planning Commission. Mr. Chinaeft thanked the Mayor end City Council end
offered his services if they should be needed in the future.
Keith Down of the Riverside County Planning Department gave a brief presentation regarding
the Santa Margarita Watershed. He announced the next meetings on the subject will be held
January 11 th and 12th at the Temecula Library.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Sam Levine, 42367 Cosmic Drive, thanked the City Council end City Staff for the Senior
Center which is highly successful and makes a big contribution to the lives of many seniors
in the City of Temecula.
Greg Treadway, 40550 Calle Madero, voiced his opposition to the lawsuit against the City
filed by Kemper regarding Walmart. He asked that the City Council stand behind their decision
and asked the citizens to stand behind the Council.
Jeanne Kearns, 27625 Jefferson Avenue, #100, owner of Gently Used Furniture, voiced her
objection to provisions of the Ordinance 92-16 and 93-12 pertaining to signs and asked that
she be allowed to display the banner on her business.
Merry Lee Olson, 27583 Rosebay Court, asked that additional proposals be accepted in
consideration of Phase Three of the City's Promotional Program.
City Manager Dixon stated he is not sure there is support for a Phase Three of the Promotional
Program and at this point no scope of work has been developed.
Council consensus was received to place discussion of the sign ordinance on the agenda for
the first meeting in January.
Gregory Treadwell, 26363 Erwin Court, Hemet, owner of Grannies Pies, addressed the
Council regarding his opposition to the Sign Ordinance, and enforcement of such ordinance.
Bruce Sparks, 27464 Commerce Center Drive, presented the City Clerk' with a petition
containing 56 signatures, requesting the suspension Of enforcement of the Sign Ordinance and
requested this matter be added to next agenda.
Council consensus was given to add discussion of the sign ordinance to the meeting of
December 14, 1993.
Evelyn Buchanan, 31174 Riverton Lane, stated that the citizens of Temecula do not want a
Walmart in Temecula.
Minutes%112393 -2- 12/06/93
Council Minutes November 23. 1993
RECFSS
Mayor Muf~oz called a recess at 8:00 AM to change the tape. The meeting was reconvened
at 8:02 PM.
David Michael, 30300 Churchill Court, thanked the City Council, Director of Public Works Tim
Serlet and City Attorney Scott Field for their assistance in getting the Long Valley Wash
cleaned out and maintained. He also stated he has enjoyed serving as the liais.on with the
business community and thanked the Mayor, City Manager Dixon and staff for their
cooperation and assistance in this position.
Nick Vultaggio, 39813 Creative Drive, expressed his feelings against Walmart locating in the
City of Temecula.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts welcomed guests from Nakoyama, Japan who are currently visitng
the City, and encouraged full participation in the Sister City Program.
Councilmember Parks stated he is a member of the Riverside County Habitat Conservation
Agency and reported that last week testimony was given regarding weed abatement in the
K-Rats and Gnatcatchers habitat areas. He reported it was agreed by the agency to draft an
urgency ordinance allowing discing around residential properties in the K-Rat areas. He stated
he has given a copy to the City Attorney and would like this matter agendized, so that
property owners within the City are able to protect their property against fire.
Counciimember Parks also stated he has close family that were within 20 feet of the
Winchester Fire and they wanted to express their sincere thanks to the citizens of Temecula
for their support and assistance to the victims of the Winchester Fire.
Mayor Mur%oz reported he attended a Mayor's Conference in Berkley end made a presentation
on the Old Town Specific Plan. He explained that new technology exists in the form of
computer imaging which allows a community to predict in advance the impacts of a proposed
project by analyzing not only the project itself but also the surrounding areas.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Stone requested that Items 8 and 9 be removed from the Consent Calendar
and he would like to make a comment on Item No. 11.
Mayor Mu~oz removed Item No. 12 from the Consent Calendar and registered a "no" vote on
Item No. 4.
Councilmember Stone commended Luci Romero, Financial Administrator, for obtaining liability
insurance renewal at a very reasonable premium.
Minutes%112393 -3- 12/06/93
Council Minutes November 23. 1993
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve
Consent Calendar Items 1-7, 10 and 11 with Mayor Mufloz voting "no" on Item No. 4.
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks, Robarts, Stone, Mufloz
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall
Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
1.1
Minutes
2.1
Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Approve the minutes of September 7, 1993.
o
Resolution Aooroving List of Demands
3.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-94
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Award of Contract for Pu)ol St. and First St. Street Widenino (Project N0. PW9~-09)
4.1
Award a contract for the Pujol St. & First Street Widening, Project
PW92-09, to IPS Services, Inc. for $73,393.31, and authorize the
Mayor to execute the contract;
4.2
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $7,339.33, which is equal to 10% of the
contract amount.
AYES;
3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Parks, Roberrs, Stone
NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Muf~oz
ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall
Minutee%l 12393 -4- 12/06/93
----.- City Council Minutes November 23. 1993
m
e
10.
11.
Completion and Accemance of Sidewalk Imorovements on the South Side of Rancho
Vista Road between Mira Loma Drive and the Community Recreation Center, Project
No, PW92-1 ~
5.1
Accept the Sidewalk Improvements on the south side of Rancho Vista
Road between Mira Loma Drive the Community Recreation Center,
Project No. PW92-12, as complete and direct the City Clerk to:
File the Notice of completion, release the Performance Bond, and
accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10%
of the contract;
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the
filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
"No Parking" 7one on Ynez Road North of Winchester Road
6,1
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council
adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-95
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONE ON YNEZ ROAD FROM WINCHESTER
ROAD TO A POINT 540' NORTH
Travel PoUcv
7.1
Continue to the meeting of 12/14/93.
Award of Bid for TCSD Vehicle
10.1
Continue to the meeting of 12/14/93.
Liability Insurance Renewal
11.1
Approve the renewal of the City's Municipal General, Automobile, and
Public Officials Errors and Omissions Liability insurance policy with
Insurance Company of the West in the amount of $103,000 annual
premium,
Pala Community Park PW93-03 CSD - AccePtance of Offer of Dedication - Temecula
Lane and Loma Linda Road
Councilmember Stone asked when this property will be. improved and accepted into
the City's street system for maintenance. Director of Public Works Tim Serlet
Minutes%112393 -5- 12/06/93
CiW Council Minutes November 23. 1993
explained that when the property develops, it will be conditioned to improved the road.
He reported that the City will accept no liability by acceptance of dedication.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
8.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-96
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR STREET AND
PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES, BUT NOT ACCEPTING INTO THE CITY-
MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM, PORTIONS OF LOMA LINDA ROAD AND
TEMECULA LANE
The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Birdsall absent.
Final Vestino Tract MaD No. 24135-3
Councilmember Stone stated their has become a discrepancy in accepting the Paloma
Del Sol Park into the park system, since Kemper alleges the City owes 1/2 million
dollars property tax assessment connected with that property. He stated he feels that
according to the development agreement and government code, this park should be
granted free and clear, and he would object to approving this Tract Map until such time
as the City has obtained the park free and clear.
Councilmember Parks stated the revised development agreement was set up to allow
a major developer to continue to build in the community during a very economic
difficult time. He explained the agreement was worked out to the mutual benefit of
Kemper and the City. He said the allocation of fees are for Assessment District 159
subsidies, and staff recommendation is to approve the map and instruct the City
Attorney to reallocate those fees to the remaining property within the specific plan
area, which would require those property owners to pay the allocation for AD-159 and
not incumber the property that is dedicated for a park.
City Attorney Field stated it is staffs recommendation that this map be approved for
final recordation. He explained, at this time, he is going ahead to initiate a process
with the Assessment District to have one assessment re-spread on the remaining
portion of the specific plan.
Councilmember Stone asked if there is any harm in continuing this decision until such
time as the City can resolve this issue.
City Attorney Field stated if the Council would like to get more information he would
recommend continuing this item.
Minaret, 112393 -6- 12/06/93
Council Minutes November 23. 1993
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Mayor Pro Tam Robarts to
continue the item until such time as the matter of the Paloma Del Sol Park dedication
is resolved.
City Attorney Field suggested continuing this item to a time certain, December 14,
1993 or the first meeting in January.
Councilmember Parks asked that this item be agendized and objected to placing the
stipulation that this map can not return until the park issue is resolved.
The motion was carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Robarts, Stone, Mufioz
NOES: 1
CO U N CI LMEMBERS: Parks
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall
12. Construction of Solana Way From Motor Car Parkway to Maroarita Road
Mayor Mur~oz asked Director of Public Works Tim Serlet to present a brief staff report.
Mr. Serlet reported staff recommendation would allow the City to revise its Sales Tax
Agreement with the adjoining property owners and receive reimbursement for the
portion of the road constructed. He stated that the 30-45 day delay will allow the
City Attorney to negotiate that agreement.
City Attorney Field stated staff met with the property owner and reached a tentative
agreement that this improvement will be handled in the same fashion as other
developer driven improvements in the Community Facilities District.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve
staff recommendation as follows:
12.1
Approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the
Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the full width
widening of Solana Way including sidewalk on the southwest side from
Motor Car Parkway easterly to Margarita Road.
The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Birdsall absent.
RECESS
Mayor Mufioz called a recess at 8:40 PM. The meeting was reconvened following the
previously scheduled Community Services District Meeting and the Redevelopment Agency
Meeting at 9:15 PM.
Minutes~l 12393 -7- 12/06/93
Council MinuTes November 23. 1993
Mayor Mufioz requested that following Item No. 13 he would like to move Items 17 and 19
forward to accommodate those who wish to speak on those items. Council consensus was
given.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
13. Operational Policies. Regulations and Fee Schedule for Indoor Facility Public Use
Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson presented the staff report.
Councilmember Parks asked if these fees have been reviewed by special interest
groups. Director Nelson stated that these fees have not been reviewed by the Sports
Council since the only changes are to the indoor fee schedule which does not affect
their events.
Mayor Mur~oz opened the public hearing at 9:21 PM. Hearing no requests to speak,
Mayor Mufioz closed the public hearing at 9:21 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve
staff recommendation 13.1 as follows:
13.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-19
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING PARK AND RECREATIONAL FACILITY OPERATIONAL POLICIES
AND REGULATIONS, ESTABLISHING GENERAL OPERATION POLICIES
GOVERNING SPECIAL USE PARKS, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 91-37
The motion was unanimously carried, with Councilmember Birdsall absent.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to
approve staff recommendation 13.2 as follows:
13.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-97
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING A REVISED FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE USE OF CITY PARKS
The motion was unanimously carried, with Councilmember Birdsall absent.
Minute.%l 12393 -8- 12/06/93
~ CiW Council Minutes November 23. 1993
COUNCIL BUSINESS
17. Construction of North General Kearnev Road Between Calle Madero and Nicolas Road
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts removed himself from discussion due to a potential conflict
of interest.
Director of Public Works Tim Serlet presented the staff report, outlining the three
alternatives proposed.
Bernie Thomas, 31525 Ave. Del Reposo, representing the Meadowview Community
Association Board of Directors, asked that the City Council approve Alternative No. 1.
Dr. Brock Kilbourne, 29821 Valle Olvera Street, addressed the City Council in
opposition to all three alternatives and requested that an Environmental Impact Report
be conducted prior to a vote being taken.
City Attorney Field advised this is an approved, recorded tract map and Alternative No.
3 has already gone through CEQA.
Kevin McKenzie, 40550 La Colima, addressed the Council in favor of Alternative No.
1, and listed his major concern regarding cut-through traffic.
Bob Ford, 29715 Valle Verde, addressed the Council in support of Alternative No. 1,
stating he would not be in support of any road that could connect Nicolas Road into
Meadowview in the future. He said Meadowview with its rural atmosphere of no
street lights and sidewalks, could not support the additional traffic this would
generate.
Councilmember Parks stated he understands the request of the community to choose
Alternate No. 1, however he has a problem regarding safety with that alternative. He
explained he is in favor of Alternative No. 2 since it achieves the desires of the
community to block cut-through traffic, however it will provide internal circulation in
Meadowview and will limit the length of the cul-de-sac making it less of a fire hazard.
Councilmember Stone stated he would support Alternate No. 2 because it addresses
the concerns of the residents and also provides better access for emergency vehicles.
Kevin McKenzie, 40550 La Colima, stated he does not feel that Alternate No. 2 offers
any further safety benefits.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to direct
staff to proceed with Alternative No. 2 with modified conditions of approval to include
fire gates on North General Kearney Road Northeasterly of Calle Olvere.
Minutee~,l 12393 -9- 12/08/93
City Council Minutes November 23, 1993
The motion was carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks, Stone
NOES: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Mur~oz
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall
ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberts
Mayor Muf~oz stated he voted to support the wishes of the residents of Meadowview
for Alternate No. 1, even if that was not the best decision, since the residents
presented a unified position.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts rejoined the City Council Meeting at 10:05 PM.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Parks to extend the
meeting to 10:30 PM. The motion was unanimously carried, with Councilmember Birdsall
absent.
19.
Discussion of Investigation Into A!leoed Imorooer Conduct Directed At Members of the
City Council
Mayor Muf~oz asked that the City Council, 1. support action to hire an independent
investigator who would report only to the City Council; 2. offer s generous reward to
encourage those citizens with information to come forward; and 3. prepare a future
ordinance that would prohibit certain types of conduct.
He asked that this action be taken for the benefit of the entire Council to allow them
to do their job without intimidation.
Mayor Muftoz called a brief recess at 10:11 PM to change the tape. The meeting was
reconvened at 1 O: 12 PM.
Councilmember Stone stated he feels a reward system should be established, but is
not sure at this point whether he supports an investigation.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts said he is against hiring a private investigator and feel that the
acts have been "dirty politics", not criminal acts. He feels that if crimes have been
committed they should be investigated by the Temecula Police Department or the
District Attorney. He stated he would not be in favor of offering e reward.
Councilmember Parks stated he does not believe anyone should go through these types
of problems. He said he has to deal with crank calls as do all public official. He
explained he was upset to have certain prominent members of the community named
without any type of proof, and he feels at this time there is not enough information to
go forward with an investigation. He stated he understands Southern California Edison
Minutes%112393 -1 O- 12/06,93
City Council Minutes November 23, 1993
is conducting their own investigation into this matter. Mr. Parks said he would be
interested in knowing how other cities handle problems such as this.
A letter was read into the record from Councilmember Birdsall by City Clerk June
Greek. Her letter asked first what exactly Mr. & Mrs. Mufioz wanted investigated;
second that if an investigation of a criminal nature takes place, that the Police
Department or District Attorney's office handle the case; third, that Councilmembers
be cautious that citizen's First Amendment Rights are not jeopardized; and fourth, she
noted all elected officials receive nasty letters and phone calls. She also stated that
elected officials have an obligation to use caution against pointing fingers and naming
names without positive proof.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to extend
the meeting until 11:00 PM. The motion was unanimously carried, with
Councilmember Birdsall absent.
John D. Wyatt, 12625 Frederick Street, Moreno Valley, representing Southern
California Edison Company, read a letter regarding allegations against one of their
employees, Doug Davies. He reported that to date there is no evidence to indicate that
Mr. Davies has acted unethically on his own or on the behalf of the company. He
stated, however, because concern has been expressed, Southern California Edison is
conducting an internal investigation into this matter, which he believes will verify that
Mr. Davies has not taken part in any of the activities described in the press.
David Michael, 30300 Churchill Court, asked the City Council to support the Mayor
and given him the support he needs to conduct this investigation.
Evelyn Buchanan, 31174 Riverton Lane, asked that the Council take all actions
proposed by Mayor Mufioz.
Greg LeBlanc, 39843, Amberley Circle, asked that the Council gather further
information and set a precedence that this type of behavior will not be acceptable in
the City of Temecula. He asked this be done not only for the benefit of the Mayor, but
also for the benefit of those named, so that their names could be cleared if no wrong
doing was found to have occured.
Bob Ford, 29715 Valle Verde, recommended that the City Council approve conducting
a complete and thorough investigation into the alleged improper conduct.
Giovanna Mur~oz, 28636 Front Street,//106, stated she requested an investigation
because, Doug Davies and Ken Dodd approached the Chief of Police to solicit his
assistance in "digging up dirt" on Mu~oz. She reported this information was revealed
to Mayor Mufioz when he approached Chief Sayre with concerns after his home was
broken into, trash had been taken and he received threatening phone calls. Mrs.
Mur~oz said she has been followed and has reason to believe her phone has been
tampered with. She stated the only way to clear this matter is to conduct an
investigation.
Minutee~l 12393 -11- 12/06/93
Council Minutee November 23. 1993
Mrs. Mufioz also stated she has been informed that others that may be involved in
these acts are the Noon Rotary, EDC and Chamber Board.
Mayor Muf~oz called a brief recess at 11:05 PM to change the tape. The meeting was
reconvened at 11:06 PM.
Councilmember Stone requested that Chief Sayre address the Council. Chief Sayre
asked Mr. & Mrs. Mufioz for their waiver of rights to privacy regarding their case in
order to answer questions. Mayor Mufioz and Mrs. Muftoz agreed to allow Chief Sayre
to answer the Council questions.
Councilmember Stone asked if anyone approached Chief Sayre requesting him to break
the law. Chief Sayre replied no.
Mayor Mufioz asked if Chief Sayre had been approached by two individuals. Chief
Sayre said he may have been approached by two individuals.
Mayor Pro Tam Roberrs asked if a private investigation was conducted, would that
detract from his investigation. Chief Sayre stated that whether to conduct an
investigation is a Council decision. He explained that if a criminal activity occurs, the
police department will investigate, whether or not another private investigation is going
on.
City Attorney Field expressed concerns about a private investigation, and suggested
having the District Attorney look into this matter.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to direct
staff to request that the Riverside County District Attorney pursue an investigation into
the allegations made by the Mayor and Mrs. Mu~oz regarding wrong doings against
members of the Council.
The motion was unanimously carried, with Councilmember Birdsall absent.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to instruct
staff to make a recommendation regarding the possibility of instituting a reward
program for information that leads to a conviction for any unlawful activities in
connection with the alleged improper conduct.
The motion was carried with Mayor Pro Tem Robarts in opposition and Councilmember
Birdsall absent.
Minutes%l 12393 -12- 12/09/93
--- City Council Minutes November 23. 1993
COUNCIL BUSINESS
14. Renulation of Vehicle Parkinn to Conform with Renuirements of the Abandoned Vehicle
Abatement ProQram (AVA)
Chief Building Official Tony Elmo presented the staff report.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Robarts to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
14.1 Adopt an urgency ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-20
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING DIVISION 2 OF CHAPTER 6.14 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL
CODE PERTAINING TO ABANDONED VEHICLES
The motion was unanimously carried, with Councilmember Birdsall absent.
15. Resolution Renuestinn Consolidation with November Election in Odd Numbered Years
City Clerk June Greek presented the staff report.
It was moved by Counciimember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tam Robarts to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-93
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA IN
SUPPORT OF THE CONSOLIDATION OF ALL LOCAL, NON-PARTISAN
ELECTIONS IN NOVEMBER OF ODD-NUMBERED YEARS
The motion was unanimously carried, with Councilmember Birdsall absent.
16. Ordinance Establishinn Prima Facie Speed Limits on Certain Streets
Director of Public Works Tim Serlet presented the staff report.
IViinutes% 112393 - 13- 12/06/83
Ciw Council Minutes
18.
November 23. 1993
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve
staff recommendation as follows:
16.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-21
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
AMENDING SECTION 12.02.010 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS
The motion was unanimously carried, with Councilmember Birdsall absent.
Status Reoort on the Detailed Imolementation Strateav and Reoional Air nualitv
Proarams
Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to receive
and file the report. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Birdsall
absent.
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
None given.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to adjourn at
11:32 PM to a meeting on November 30, 1993, 6:30 PM, Murrieta City Council Chambers,
26442 Beckman Court, Murrieta, California.
ATTEST:
J. Sal Muf~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Minutee%l 12393
ITEM
NO.
3
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLIYTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THY~ CITY
OF ~A ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF_.CULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been
audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of
$2,022,734.42.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADO~, this 14th day of December, 1993.
ATTEST:
J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
5~r~o$~340
STATE OF CALIFO~)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 93- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 14th day of November, 1993 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 0
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
None
June S. Greek, City Clerk
1/18/93 TOTAL CHECK RU N:
1/23/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
2/02/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
12/14/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
1/18/93 TOTAL PAYROLL:
2/02/93 TOTAL PAYROLL.:
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
$88,434.63
$54,711.04
$265,292.18
$1,424,909.72
$103,623.89
$105,762.96
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 12/14/93 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001
100
190
191
1 g2
193
210
2~G....
3,....
310
320
330
340
GENERAL
GAS TAX
TCSD
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP)
TCSD-CIP
RDA-CIP
SELF-INSURANCE
VEHICLES
INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS
COPY CENTER
FACILITIES
$1,326,5~9.59
$135,243.90
862,719.53
s7,,;7'5.95
$12,310.58
$23,610.88
$37,270.2t
$34,858.74
$114,487.51
Sl 6,430.86
$6,476.86
PAYROLL:
191
300
3~
330
GENERAL (PAYROLL)
GAS TAX (PAYROLL)
TCSD (PAYROLL)
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A (PAYROLL)
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C (PAYROLL)
SELF-INSURANCE (PAYROLL)
INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PAYROLL)
COPY CENTER (PAYROLL)
$131,882.84
$34,512.94
$32,121.32
$866.82
$~,430.50
$1,099,g7
$2,452.88
$3,019.78
TOTAL BY FUND:
MARY JANE RN , FINANCE OF~IC~R~'~H ~
FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
DIXON, CITY MANAGER
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
$2,022,734,42
$1,813,347.57
$209,386.85
$2.022,73,4.42
VOUCHRE2
11/18/93
14:41
CZTY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERZODS
FUND TZTLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 COI414LIN/TY SERV]CES DISTRICT
191 TCSD $ERVZCE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVZCE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL INPROVEHENT PROJ FUND
300 INSURANCE FUND
· 320 INFORMATION SYSTENS
330 COPY CENTER FUND
TOTAL
41,647.17
12,762.35
9,855.74
659.03
891.08
75.00
257.33
1,513.89
CiTY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECX CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
iTEM
DESCR/PTiON
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AleXINT
CHECK
ANOUNT
3088?5 11/18/93 000283
308875 11/18/93 000283
308875 11/18/93 000283
30887'5, 11/18/93 000283
308875 11/18/93 000283
308875 11/18/~3 000283
308875 11/18/93 000283
308875 11/18/93 000283
308875 11118193 000283
308875 11/18/93 000283
308875 11/18/93 000283
308875 11/18/93 000283
308875 11/18/93 000283
308875 11/18/93 000283
308875 11/18/93 000283
308875 11/18/93 000283
344900 11/18/93 000444
344900 11/18/93 00D444
344900 11/18/93 000444
3/~900 11/18/93 0004~4
344P/'' 11/18/93 000z~4
344, 11/18/93 000~
344900 11/18/93 0004~
344900 11/18/93 0004/~
344900 11/18/93 0004z~
344900 11/18/93
344900 11/18/93 O00t~4
344900 11/18/93 000~.4
344900 11/18/93 00042~
344900 11/18/93 000/~
344900 11/18/93 000~44
12724 11/18/93 000194
12724 11/18/93 000194
12724 11/18/93 000194
12724 11/18/93 000194
12724 11/18/93 000194
12724 11/18/93 000194
12724 11/18/93 000194
12725 11 / 18/93 000246
12725 11/18/93 000246
12725 11/18/93 000246
12~25 11/18/93 000246
12725 11/18/93 000246
12725 11/18/93 0002/.6
12725 11/18/93 0002/.6
12725 11 / 18/93 000246
11 / 18/93 000246
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (iRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (]RS)
FIRSTAX (iRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX ([RS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
F/RSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX CEDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MED[CARE
000283 NEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
0004~4 SO I
0004~,4 ~ ]
000444 SD]
000444 ~ l
0004Z~4 SD I
0004A4 SD l
000444 SD X
0004,44 STATE
0004~, STATE
0004>44 STATE
0004/~. STATE
000/~44 STATE
000444 STATE
000~ STATE
000444 STATE
ICMA RETIREMENT 00019~ DEF CONP
]CMA RETIREMENT 000194 DEF COMP
ICMA RETIREMENT 000194 DEF COMP
ICMA RETIREMENT 000194 DEF COHP
ICMA RETIREMENT 000194 DEF COMP
ICMA RETIREMENT 000194 DEF CONP
iCNA RETIREMENT 000194 DEF CORP
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETZREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES~ RET[REM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIREN 0002~6
PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIREN 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PER REDE
PER REDE
PERS RET
PERS RET
PERS RET
PERS RET
PERS RET
PERS RET
PERS RET
PERS RET
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
300-2070
330-2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
001-2080
100-2080
190-2080
191-2080
193-2080
300-2080
330-2080
001-2130
100-2130
001-2390
100-2390
190-2390
191-2390
193-2390
300-2390
320-2390
330-2390
9,842.32
2,884.~
2,195.~
2~.61
~.~
247.11
2,2~.61
~0.08
557.56
16.~
60,09
19.71
45.02
~.16
499.82
121
168.10
7.22
26.93
3.02
20.69
2,428.95
704.09
456.29
21.46
49.91
25.56
56.45
13.98
1,601.33
566.16
496.~
34.08
41.66
25.37
50. O0
107.35
107.35
11,027.35
2,553.74..
2,339.49
80.06
284.39
96.49
232.35
226.87
19,332.32
4,604.19
2,813.56
VOUCHRE2
11/18/93
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
12725
12725
12725
12725
12725
12725
127.25
12725
12726
12727
12728
12728
12728
12728
12728
12728
12728
12728
12729
12729
12730
12730
12730
12731
12732
12733
12734
12735
12736
12737
12738
12738
12738
12738
12738
12739
14:41
CHECK
DATE
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
· 11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/{~
11/18/95
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
11/18/93
VENDOR
NUMBER
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000253
000282
000294
000294
000294
000294
0002~4
0002~4
000294
000294
000325
000325
000~89
000389
000389
000~02
00052~
000576
000612
000653
000684
000841
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
001221
VENDOR
NAME
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM
PERS EMPLOYEES' RET[REM
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREH
PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REM
PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REM
PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REM
POSTMASTER
SCMAF
STATE COffi>ENSATION INS.
STATE COMPENSATIOR INS.
STATE COHPENSATION INS.
STATE COHPENSATION INS.
STATE COHPENSATION INS.
STATE COHPENSATION INS.
STATE COMPENSATION INS.
STATE COHPENSATIOH INS.
UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN
UNITED ~AY OF THE INLAN
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
000246 SURVIVOR
BULK NAIL/BUSINESS LICE
MEMBERSHXP
OCTOBER 93
OCTOBER 93
OCTOBER 93
OCTOBER 93
OCTOBER 93
OCTOBER 93
OCTOBER 93
OCTOBER 95
000325 tN
000325 uw
USCM/PEBSCO, (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
USCM/PEBSCO, COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
USCM/PEBSCO, (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
BERG, MARK
E .M.W.D.
MESA HONES
WENTZ, ED
LUCKY STONE
DIEHL, EVANS & COMPANY
PROCD, INC.
USOI/PEBSCO (DEF. COHP.
USON/PEBSCO (DEF. COHP.
USON/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP.
USCH/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP.
USCH/PEBSCO (DEF. COHP.
FLORES, JOHANNA
REINB/RENEWAL ICBO
INSPECTION SE~ER LATERA
REFUND/PLAN REVISION
COMMISSIONERS DINNER/DA
SUPPL/ES COOKIE MONSTER
TAX MORKSHOR/RW,BS
SOFTWARE UPGRADE
001065 DEF CONP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF CONP
001065 DEF CONP
001065 DEF CONP
CONSULTANT FEE
TOTAL CHECKS
ACCOUNT
NUIIER
001-;?.~90
100-2390
190-2390
191-2390
300-2390
320-2390
330-2390
001-140-~-5230
1~0-180-~9-5226
001-2370
100-2~70
1~i:)-2370
191-2370
320-2370
001-1182
330-2370
001-2120
1~0-2120
001-2160
100-2160
1~0-2160
001-162-9~-5261
210-199-801-5804
001-2670
001-100-999-5265
190-18~-~-5320
001-140-999-5258
320-199-~-5221
001-2080
100-2080
1~:)-2080
300-2080
320-2080
1~0-180-~-5250
ITEM
AMOUNT
59.17
11.61
12.09
.42
1.44
.93
1,86
407.00
45.00
8,633.20
4,856.31
2,878.90
415.08
177.05
220.53
331.74
333.53
87.00
17.50
75.60
180.59
192.11
90.00
75.00
350.00
350.00
40.00
100.00
399.00
3,365.73
147.98
256.32
3.47
312.50
200.00
2
CHECK
AMOUNT
17,143.42
407.00
45.00
17,846.34
10~.50
448.30
90.00
75.00
350.00
350.00
40.00
100.00
399.00
4,1386.00
""~00
68,434.63
VOUCHR/~.,, PAGE 7
11/23/ ]7:50
CITY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGZSTER
FOR ALL PERZODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 CONWdNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD
280 REDEVELOPt4ENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FUND
320 INFORI~ATIOM SYSTENS
330 COPY CENTER FUND
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL
AIXJNT
12,659.01
2,228.~
7,225.72
6,102.62
12,310.58
7,5b4.06
286.20
3,021.T/'
~58,,~.
187.82
56,711.06
VOUCHRE2 P~ 1
11/2~/93 1750
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
12747
12748
12749
1275.0
12751
12752
12753
12753
12754
12754
12754
12755
12755
12755
12756
12757
12757
12758
12758
12758
12758
12759
12760
12761
12762
12763
12764
12764
12764
12764
12764
12764
12764
12764
CHECK
DATE
11/23/93
11/2~/~3
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11123193
11123193
11123193
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11123/93
11123193
11/23/93
11123/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11123193
VENDOR
NUMBER
000105
000112
000112
000122
000122
000122
000127
000127
000127
000129
000135
000135
000137
000137
000137
000137
000154
000155
000164
000170
000173
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NAHE DESCRIPTION NUMBER
KOHLBERG, L]SA
ELI LILLY & CO
RZCK'S PLUMBING
SPIVEY, JANET J.
THE DOG HOUSE
AEI SECURITY, INC.
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC
BSN SPORTS
BSN SPORTS
BSN SPORTS
CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL
CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL
CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL
CAL WEST RENTAL CENTER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
CSMFO
DAVLIN
ESGIL CORPORATION
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
GENERAL BINDING
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
TCSD REFUND/KOHLBERG LI 190-183-4982
REFUND OF DEPOSIT 001-2650
BL REFUND/RICK'S PLUHBX 001-199-4056
**SPIVEY, JANET CLAIM N 300-199-~'5207
DOG HOUSE/REFUND BUS. L 001-1{~-4056
ALARM HONITORING; CITY ~0-199-~-5250
01/94-12/94 DUES NASSEH 001-161-~-5226
01/94-12/~4 DUES MEYER 001-161-~-5226
NA631XXX DELUXE GACKGAN
SHIPPING AND HANDLING
TAX
190-181-99~-5301
190-181-~-5301
190-181-999-5301
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN
PUBLIC NOTICES CITY CLE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN
001-161-999-5256
001-120-~-5256
001-161-~-5256
RENTAL EQUIPMENT
190-180-999-5238
6 VOLT BATTERIES FOR TY 100-164-~-5218
TAX 100-164-~-5218
7~20772253 GAS CREDIT C 001-110-~-5263
7~20772253 GAS CREDIT C 001-170-~-5262
7~20772253 GAS CREDIT C 100-164-999-5263
7~20772253 GAS CREDIT C 001-120-~99-5262
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 1994 001-140-~9~-5226
VIDEO TABE CC MT 11/0~ 001-100-999-5250
PLAN CHECKS OCT 1993 001-162-~q~-5248
SHIPPING & HANDLING 190-180-~-5220
HAINT AGREEMENT
330-199-~-5242
DISK FILE LIBRARY
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SU
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
001-140-~-5220
001-161-~-5220
001-140-~-5220
001-110-~-5220
001-161-~-5220
001-161-~-5220
001-140-~-5220
001-140-~-5220
ITEM
AMOUNT
45,00
36.00
35.00
444.71
35.00
105,00
143.00
237.00
96,25
9.62
7,46
42.59
76,66
109,10
918.75
71.20
48.87
25.43
16,11
100,00
700,00
149,60
2,46
175.00
10,21
62,04
203.35
142.12
89.08
12.41
31,17
63.98
CHECK
AMOUNT
45.00
36.00
35.00
444.71
35.00
105,00
380.00
113.33
"~7
109.10
989.95
238.40
100.00
~0,00
149.60
2.46
175,00
17:50 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER]OU$
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NLNBER DATE NLNBER N/~E DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ZTEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
ANOrJNT
12764 11/23/93 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT RETURN
12764 11/23/93 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRCOUCT CREDIT SUPPLIES
001-140-999-5220
001-161-999-5220
10.21-
20.12-
12765 . 11/23/93 000180 GRAY BAR ELECTRIC 556796-1NqP 110 PATCH 250-190-129-5804
12765 11/23/93 000180 GRAY BAR ELECTRIC 557396-1NqP PATCH PANE 250-190-129-5804
12765 11/23/93 000180 GRAY BAR ELECTRIC LDIOE16-A PANDUZT TYPE 250-190-129-5804
12765 11/23/93 000180 GRAY BAR ELECTRIC FREIGHT 250-190-129-580~
12765 11/23/93 000180 GRAY BAR ELECTRIC TAX 250-190-129-580~
107.04
34.12
119.40
20.20
286.20
12766 11/23/93 000184 GTE 909-699-8632 OCT 320-199-999-5208
12766 11/23/93 00018/, GTE 909-695-3564/CIq 320-199-999-5208
12766 11/23/93 000104 GTE 909-699-2475/PW 100-164-999-5208
19.11
35.81
21.81
12767 11/23/93 000186 HANKS HARDWARE
12767 11/23/93 000186 HANKS HARDWARE
12767 11/23/93 000186 HANKS HARDWARE
CITY ACCOUNT 10/31/93
MISC. TOOLS & SUPPLIES
NZSC. SUPPLIES - NUTS,
340-199-999-5242
100-164-999-5242
100-164-999-5242
333.70
45.61
59.10
438.41
12768 11/23/93 000192
12768 11/23/93 000192
12768 11/23/93 000192
12768 11/23/93 000192
12~ 1/23/93 000206
12769 11/23/93 000206
12769 11/23/93 000206
12769 11/23/93 000206
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPL[E
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPL[E
KINKO'S COPIES
KINKO'S COPIES
KINKO'S COPIES
KINKO'S COPIES
C6148 PROFILE ZZ HEADSE
C4814 AUTO DATA SWITCH
FREIGHT
TAX
MISC. PRINTING SERVICES
NISC. PRINTING SERVICES
COPY MORK AND BINDING
PRINTING
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
001-161-999-5222
001-161-999-5222
195.00
129.95
9.06
25.65
2.10
10.72
113.18
21.28
359,66
147.28
12770 11/23/93 000220 NAURICE PRINTERS QUICK FOLD OVER INVITATIONS A 001-100-999-5260
12770 11/23/9] 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS QUICK TAX 001-100-999-5260
116.00
124,99
12771 11/23/9] 000226 MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT CANON BJIOEX PRINTER BL 001-171-999-5221
12771 11/23/93 000226 MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT TAX 001-171-999-5221
251.00
19.46
12772 11/23/93 000243 PAYLESS DRUG STORE FILM AND FILM PROCESSIN 001-162-999-5250
54.18
54.18
12773 11/23/93 000248 PETROLANE FUEL 001-162-999-5263
12.90
12.90
12774 11/23/93 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE JOB ANNOUNCEMENTS 001-150-999-5254
102.66
102.66
12775 11/23/9] 000262 RANCHO WATER 9/08-10/11 190-181-999-5240
12775 11/23/9] 000262 RANCHO MATER 9/07-10/12 193-180-999-5240
12775 11/23/93 000262 RANCHO MATER 9/07-10/12 190-180-999-5240
12775 11/23/93 000262 RANCHO MATER 9/07-10/12 191-180-999-5240
12775 11/23/93 000262 RANCHO WATER 9/20-10/25 193-180-999-5240
12775 11/23/93 000262 RANCHO WATER 9/20-10/25 190-180-999-5240
12775 11/23/93 000262 RANCHO WATER WATER 193-180-999-5240
12776 11/23/93 000266 RIGHTWAY NOV 93 PORTABLE TOILET 100-164-999-5238
70.85
1,353.24
2,577.88
241.43
5,317.34
504.52
893.48
57.39
11,038.74
57.39
1277,7."~11/23/93 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T OIL CHANGE 310-164-999-5214 20.90
12~ 1/23/93 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T REPAIR & NAINT. CITY VE 310-180-999-5214 20.90 41.98
VOUCHRE2
11/23/93 17:50
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER[OOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUNBER DATE NUNBER NANE
]TEN
DESCR/PT]ON
ACCOUNT
NUNBER
ITEN
ANOUNT
CHECK
ANOUMT
12778 11/2~/93 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY
12778 11/23/93 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY
12778 11/23/93 000307 TENECULA TROPHY
12778.11/23/93 000307 TENECULA TROPHY
12778 11/2~/93 000307 TENECULA TROPHY
VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION
TAX
SUPPL [ ES
OPEN P.O. FOR AWARDS, R
OPEN P.O. FOR AgARD$, R
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
190-182-999-5301
190-183-999-5~80
190-183-999-5380
271.15
21.02
16.39
'24.26
4.85-
327.95
1277~ 11/23/93 000308 TENEOULA TO~NE AS~OC]AT RENT
127~ 11/23/93 000308 TENEOULA TiE ASSOCIAT LOCIQ~R RENT
001-100-~-523~
190-180-999-5238
74~.00
15.00
759.00
12780 11/23/93 000320 TO~N CENTER STATIONERS CREDIT/SUPPLIES
12780 11/23/93 000320 TOWN CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES
001-16~-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
12,81-
133,50
120.69
12781 11/23/93 000326
12781 11/2~/9] 000326
12781 11/23/93 000326
12781 11/23/9:5 000326
12781 11/23/93 000326
UNZTOG RENTAL SERVICE
UNZTOG RENTAL SERVICE
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
2 SETS OF UNIFORMS CLEA 100-164-999-5243
2 SETS OF UNIFORNS CLEA 100-164-999-5243
UNIFORM RENTAL 190-180-999-5243
UNIFORM RENTAL 190-180-999-5243
FLOOR NAT SERVICES; CZT 340-199-999-5250
23.00
23.00
16.10
16.10
34.50
112.70
12782 11/23/93 000340 VHITE CAP
12782 11/23/93 000340 WHITE CAP
TOOLS 100-164-999-5242
TAX 100-164-999-5242
6.59
.51
7.10
12783 11/23/93 000353
12784 11/23/93 000374
12784 11/23/93 000374
12~84 11/23/93 000374
12784 11/23/93 000374
12784 11/23/93 000374
RZVERSIDE, COUNTY AUD/T
SOUTHERN CALIF ED[SO~
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
9 PARCELS 190-180-999-5370
10/06-11/02
10/06-11/02
10/09-11/05
10/09-11/05
9/23-10/2]
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
190-181-999-5240
135.00
30.81
129.22
206.23
52.94
517.30
~'~00
936.50
12785 11/23/93 000375
12785 11/23/93 000375
12785 11/23/93 000375
12785 11/23/93 000375
12785 11/23/93 000375
12785 11/23/93 000375
12785 11/23/93 000375
12785 11/23/93 000375
12785 11/23/93 000375
12785 11/23/93 000375
12785 11/23/93 000375
12785 11/23/93 000375
12785 11/23/93 000375
12785 11/23/93 000375
12785 11/23/93 000375
12785 11/23/93 000375
12785 11/23/93 000375
12785 11/23/93 000375
12785 11/23/93 000375
12785 11/23/93 000375
12786 11/23/93 000/,08
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CAL[F TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CAL[F TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CAL[F TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
AGRICREDIT ACCEPTANCE C
909-202-4204 OCT WE
909-202-4751 OCT TS
909-202-4753 OCT BH
909-202-4754 OCT KH
909-202-4755 OCT VAN
909-202-4756 OCT TH
909-202-4757 OCT JG
909-202-4758 OCT RR
909-202-4759 SEPT TE
909-202-4762 OCT RP
909-202-4763 OCT PB
909-202-4764 OCT BBB
909-202-4765 BB OCT
909-202-4769 OCT JS
909-202-4770 OCT DD
909-202-4752/SN
909-202-4760/PW
909-202-4761/SN
909-202-4767/GT
909-202-4767/GT
DEC TRACTOR LEASE
001-110-999-5208
100-164-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
001-120-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-162-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
100-164-999-5208
100-164-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-110-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
100-164-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-161-999-5208
001-161-999-5208
190-180-999-5~39
48.85
65.70
43.23
46.72
~6.72
35.04
37,53
72.55
53.42
111.11
50.00
69.04
90.16
61.79
126.84
142.22
90.98
104.70
77.02
109.69
846.02
1,~83.31
VOUCHR~,2~
11/23~ 17:50
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NAME DESCR I PT I ON NUMBER
ITEN
Affi3UNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
12787 11/23/93 00042~
12787 11/23/93
12787 11/23/93 000/,23
12788 11/2~/93 000426
12788 11/23/93 000426
127~9 11/23/93 000502
H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU
H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU
H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SLIPPL
CALIFORNIA MUNIC]PAL ST
SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5301
SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5301
SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5301
JAMITOR]AL SUPPLIES; C/
SUPPLIES
1992-93 ASSESSED VALUAT
340-199-999-5212
190-181-999-5212
001-140-999-5250
48.90
11.52
22.72
52.34
105.13
350.00
83.14
157.47
350.00
12790 11/25/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 09/30-10/31/9~ 191-180-999-5319
12790 11/23/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EOI 09/30-10/~1/93 191-180-999-5319
12790 11/23/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 09/~0-10/31/9~ 191-180-999-5319
12790 11/23/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EOI 9/~0-10/31 191-180-999-5319
12790 11/23/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 9/09-10/31 191-180-999-5319
12790 11/23/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 10/01-10/31 191-180-999-5319
12790 11/23/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EOI 9/30-10/31 191-180-999-5319
12790 11/23/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 09/30-10/31/93 191-180-999-5319
12790 11/23/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EOI 09/30-10/31/93 191-180-999-5319
12790 11/23/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 09/30-10/31/93 191-180-999-5319
12790 11/23/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 09-30-10/31-93 191-180-999-5319
12790 11/23/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 9/30-10/31 191-180-999-5319
127~'~ 1/23/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 09/30-10/31/93 191-180-999-5319
127, |/23/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 09/30-10/31/93 191-180-999-5319
12790 11/23/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 12/01-10/31 192-180-999-5319
12790 11/23/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EOI 09/30/10/31/93 191-180-999-5319
12790 11/23/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EOI 09/30/10/31/93 191-180-999-5319
12790 11/23/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EOI 09/31-10/31/93 191-180-999-5319
12790 11/23/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EOI 09/30-10/31/93 191-180-999-5319
12790 11/2~/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EOI 09/30-10/31/93 191-180-999-5319
12790 11/23/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 7/22-10/31 191-180-999-5319
12790 11/23/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EO1 09/30-10/31/93 191-180-999-5319
12790 11/23/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EOI 9/30-10/31 191-180-999-5319
12790 11/23/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 9/30-10/31 192-180-999-5319
12790 11/23/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED! 9/30-10/31 192-180-999-5319
12791 11/23/93 000545 PAC TEL CELLULAR - S.D. LA 6015202110193 320-199-999-5208
~8.67
43.~4
19.61
20.08
64.59
8.?6
37.48
40.54
40.67
43.21
42.26
42.39
42.80
43,21
12,247.17
37.90
37.19
129.04
32.46
33.83
4,571.78
31.18
4 0.90
28.46
77.92
17,752.57
77.92
12792 11/23/93 000580 PHOTO MORKS FILM/SLIDES 190-180-999-5301
12792 11/23/93 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILN/SLIDES 190-180-999-5301
21.37
23.15
44.52
12793 11/23/93 000633 ANDERSON, JOLENE ADVERTISING/VALLEY NAP 280-199-999-5264
12794 11/23/93 000684 OIEHL, EVANS &CONPANY TAX WORKSHOP/TM 001-140-999-5261
2,595.00
50.00
2,595.00
50.00
12795 11/23/93 000699 CPOA 1994 LEGISLATIVE UPOATE 001-170-999-5261
546.00
546.00
12796 11/23/93 000718 NRPA ANNUAL 199~ DUES 190-180-999-5226
210.00
210.00
12797 11/23/93 000745 AT & T - CELLULAR 619-987-1828 OCT MJM 001-140-999-5208
121 1/23/93 000894 PRESENTATION PRODUCTS TAPES 001-161-999-5220
8.78
69.38
8.78
VOUCHRE2 ~ 5
11/23/93 17:50 .
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
12798
127~
127~
12800
12801
12802
12803
12803
12803
12803
12804
12804
12804
12805
12805
12805
12805
12805
12805
12805
12806
12807
12808
12809
12810
12811
12811
12812
12813
12814
12814
12814
12814
12814
12814
CHECK
DATE
11123193
11123193
· 11123193
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/~J
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
11/23/93
VENDOR
NtJMBER
000894
000947
000947
000950
000968
000980
000~2
000~2
O00~q2
000992
000993
000993
0009~
001002
001002
001002
001002
001002
001002
001002
001029
001030
001046
001076
001102
001103
001103
001109
001142
001153
001153
001153
001153
001153
001153
CITY OF TEECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CELl(
NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT N~T
PRESENTATIOR PRODUCTS
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
CALIFORNIAN - DISPLAY
CREATIVE PROMOTION
COAST IRRIGATION ,SUPPLY
RANONA TIRE
RANONA TIRE
RAMONA TIRE
RAIqONA TIRE
FREEDOM COFFEE, INC.
FREEDOM COFFEE, INC.
FREEDOM COFFEE, INC.
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
DATA QU/CK
MINI-GRAPHIC SYSTEMS, I
REXON, FREEDMAN, KLEPET
VESTERN WASTE
NURSERYLAND
FREEDOM MATERIALS
FREEDOM MATERIALS
SMITH TRACTOR SERVICE
MARKHAM & ASSOCIATES
FIRE PROTECTION PUBLICA
FIRE PROTECTION PUBLICA
FIRE PROTECTION PUBLICA
FIRE PROTECTION PUBLICA
FIRE PROTECTION PUBLICA
FIRE PROTECT]ON PUBLICA
TAPES 001'161~'5220
NISC. BLUEPR]NT REPRODU 001-103-g99-5268
BLUEPRINTS O01-161-ggg-5224
JOB ANNOUNCEMENTS 001-150-9f9-5254
PRODUCTION GUIDE 280-199-999-5264
NISC IRRIGATION SUPPLIE 199-180-999-5212
TIRE SERVICES FOR CITY
TIRE SERVICES CITY VEHI
TIRE SERVICES CITY VEHI
BRAKES & LOF
310-164-9~-5216
310-164-999-5214
310-180-999-5216
310-164-999-5216
COFFEE SERVICE; CITY HA :r~0-199-~-5250
COFFEE SERVICE; CITY HA :~0-199-~-5250
UNDERBILLED ON [MY 1332
56736645403910040 OCT PB
5673666/,03910057 CREDIT
5673666603910073 OCT RP
5673666403910081 OCT RR
5673666403910115 OCT JG
5473666/,03910123 OCT GT
5673666403910164 OCT $M
001-100-999-5258
001-100-~-5258
001-100-99~-5258
001-100-~-5258
001-120-~-5258
001-161-999-5258
001-100-99~-5258
DATAQUICK INFORMATION S 320-199-999-5250
DUPLICATE APERTURE CARD 001-120-999-5250
OCT LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-~-5247
PORTABLE TOILET 190-180-~-5238
PURCHASE XMAS TREE/HOSP 190-180-~-5212
10 BAGS f_tO SILICA SAND 100-164-99~-5218
35 SACKS ~ SILICA 100-164-~-5218
WEED ABATEMENT SERVICES 001-162-999-5440
CULVERT UPGRADE/ENG SVC 100-164-999-5248
35622; FIRE DEPT. AERIA
35109; FIRE SERVICE GRO
35111; SALVAGE AND OVER
35107; FIRE VENTILATION
35478; H]GH ANGLE RESUE
35606; ROPE RESCUE NANU
001-171-~-5228
001-171-999-5228
001-171-~-5228
001-171-~-5228
001-171-~9~-5228
001-171-999-5228
69.38
199.11
21.01
21.76
426.77
317.47
92.96
73.24
572.67
162.72
129.62
120.14
3.00
668.78
11.&&
942.62
589.01
1, O01.56
1,355.52
(~2.12
27.57
160.07
384.16
455.00
75.41
~8.79
119.60
227.00
625. O0
25.00
20.00
15.00
15.00
23.95
23.00
138.16
220.12
21.76
426.77
317.47
901.37
252.56
5,011.27
27.57
140.07
384.16
455.00
75.41
158.39
227.00
425.00
VOUCHR,,g?.,,,
11/23/ 17:50
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
12814, 11/23/93 001153
12814 11/23/93 001153
12814 11/23/93 001153
12814, .11/23/93 001153
12814 11/23/93 001153
128~5 11123193 001172
12815 11123193 001172
12815 11123193 001172
VENDOR
NAME
FIRE PROTECTION PUBLICA
FIRE PROTECTION PUBLICA
FIRE PROTECTION PUBL]CA
FIRE PROTECT]ON PUBL]CA
FIRE PROTECTION PUBLICA
DELL COMPUTER
DELL COMPUTER
DELL COMPUTER
12816 11/23/93 001177 AEP
12817 11/23/93 001197
12818 11/23/93 001203
12819 11/23/93 001219
12819 11/23/93 001219
12819 11/23/93 001219
12820 11/23/93 001220
1282 1/23/93 001222
12821 11/23/93 001222
12821 11/23/93 001222
12821 11/23/93 001222
12821 11/23/93 001222
12821 11/23/93 001222
12821 11/23/93 001222
12821 11/23/93 001222
12821 11/23/9] 001222
CHOCOLATE FLORIST, THE
U.S. HOVING & STORAGE,
TENECULA VALLEY LASER R
TEMECULA VALLEY LASER R
TEMECULA VALLEY LASER R
POLAROID CORP
ALPHA COMMUNICATIONS
ALPHA COIffiNICATIONS
ALPHA COMNtJNICATIONS
ALPHA C{3qMUNICATIONS
ALPHA COIq!NN]CATIONS
ALPHA CONNIJNICATIONS
ALPHA COMMUNICATIONS
ALPHA COIqqUNICATIONS
ALPHA COMMUNICATIONS
12822 11/23/93 001223 GRG
1282] 11/23/93 001224
12824 11/23/93 001228
12825 11/23/93 001229
12826 11/23/93 001230
NIGHTINGALE CONANT
RAILS-TO-TRAILS CONSERR
SAN DIEGO ASSOC. OF GOV
U.S. CHAMBER OF COMNERC
CiTY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ZTEN
DESCRIPTION
35308; PRINC]PLES OF
35458; AIRCRAFT RESCUE
35108; FIRE SERVICE RES
FREIGHT
35289; FORCIBLE ENTRY
312-104,2 BATTERY PACK F
FREIGHT
TAX
ADD'L DUE/RATE INCREASE
AIqENIT]ES FOR DIGN]TARI
HOVE PIANO TO SENIOR CE
OZONE FILTER HPIII
SERVICE - CLEANING
TAX
PHOTO FRANES FOR BKFT W
TCSD PAGER PRORATED
TCSD PRO HATED PAGER
PAGER RENTAL
PAGER RENTAL
PAGER RENTAL
PAGER RENTAL
PAGER RENTAL
PAGER RENTAL
PAGER RENTAL
ENV. HEALTH OVERVIEW
TAPES & WORKBOOK
PUBLICATION ON TRAILS
FORUM HABITAT CONSERVAT
PUBLICATIONS LZBHARY
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-171-~-5228
001-171-~-5228
001-171-99~-5228
001-171-~-5228
001-171-999-5228
001-170-999-5221
001-170-999-5221
001-170-999-5221
001 - 161-999-5226
190-183-999-5370
1~0-181-;-5301
320-199-999-5215
320-199-999-5215
320-199-999-5215
190-183-99~~5370
190-180-999-5238
190-180-999-5238
190-180-999-5238
100-164-999-5238
320-199-999-5238
001-170-999-524,2
001 - 14,0-999-5250
001-162-999-5238
100-164~999-5238
001-161-999-5228
001-161-999-5261
190-180-999-5228
001-161-999-5258
001-161-999-5228
ITEM
AMOUNT
25,00
20,00
15,00
26,03
20,00
79,00
6.0O
6.13
20,00
35.70
75,00
30.00
360.00
2.33
12,09
8,07
99,00
66,00
11,00
11.00
11,00
33.00
11,00
35,05
44.71
28,95
80.00
38.51
PAGE 6
CHECK
AMOUNT
227,98
91.13
20,00
35.70
75,00
392.33
262,16
35.05
44,71
28,95
80,00
38.51
TOTAL CHECKS
54,711.04
VOUCHRE2
12/02/93
17:06
CiTY OF TENEClJLA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL INPROVENENT PROJ FUND
250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSO
.280 REDEVELOPRENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FUND
320 INFORFIATIOR SYSTENS
330 COPY CENTER FUND
3AO FACiLiTiES
TOTAL
ANOUNT
59,220.50
29,052.39
25,145.12
414.30
1,883.59
1,585.94,
936.00
42.42
103,030.66
2,141.03
4,323.9~
33,078.28
265,292.18
CITY OF TENECULA
17:06 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER%OD$
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUNBER DATE IKNBER NAME DESCRIPTION NLNBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
12829 12/01/93 0006~5 PARTY PALACE, THE
COTTON CANDY MACHINE (R 190-183-999-5370
69.50
69.50
352156 12/02/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 00044~, SDI 001-2070
352156 12/02/93 0004~ FIRSTAX (EDD) O004J~ Sl)I 100-2070
352156 12/02/93 0004~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 000/,44 SDI 190-2070
352156 12/02/93 O004Z~+ FIRSTAX (EDD) O00~z, SDI 191-2070
3521~6 12/02/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0006z~ SOI 193-2070
352156 12/02/93 O00A4~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 00044Z, SDI 300-2070
352156 12/02/93 000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~4 SDI 330-2070
352156 12/02/93 000/~, FIRSTAX (EDD) 000/~'~ STATE 001-2070
352156 12/02/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) O00M~ STATE 100-2070
352156 12/02/93 OOC~ FIRSTAX (EDD) OOet:~ STATE 190-2070
352156 12/02/93 000444 F%RSTAX (EDD) 000/~-~ STATE 191-2070
352156 12/02/93 000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~ STATE 19'5-2070
352156 12/02/93 O004z~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~ STATE 300-2070
352156 12/02/93 00044~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 00066~ STATE 320-2070
352156 12/02/93 0004/~, FIRSTAX (EDD) 000446 STATE 330-2070
374228 12/02/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070
374228 12/02/93 000283 FIRSTAX ([RS) 000283 FEDERAL 100-2070
374228 12/02/93 000283 FIRSTAX ([RS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070
3742r""2102/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 191-2070
374~ .2/02/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070
374228 12/02/93 000283 FIRSTAX (1RS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070
374228 12/02/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-2070
374228 12/02/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070
374228 12/02/93 000283 FIRSTAX (]RS) 000283 MEDICARE 001-2070
374228 12/02/93 000283 FIRSTAX (]RS) 000283 ED]CARE 100-2070
374228 12/02/93 000283 FIRSTAX (]RS) 000283 MEDICARE 190-2070
374228 12/02/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE 191-2070
374228 12/02/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NED[CARE 193-2070
374228 12/02/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE 300-2070
374228 12/02/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NED[CARE 320-2070
374228 12/02/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NED[CARE 330-2070
12836 12/02/93 MCKIE, VICKIE TCSD REFUND/MCKIE, VICK 190-183-4982
519.37
114.29
153.95
7.22
26.93
2.81
20.69
2,546.19
685.13
492.84
49.91
25.55
56.45
13.98
10,228.96
2,787.29
2,277.35
84.62
249.61
83.25
247.11
79.95
2,388.93
607.36
571.86
16.09
60,09
19.23
45.02
46.16
18.00
19,792.88
18.00
12837 12/02/93 HEPBURN, ANITA
POLICE REFUND/HEPBURN 001-199-4060
5.00
5.00
12838 12/02/93 BOMERSOX, DEENA
TCSD REFUND/BOgERSOX 190-183-4982
40.00
40.00
12839 12/02/93 000102 AMERICAN FENCE COMPANY SPORTS PARK TENP FENCE 190-180-999-5238
145.00
145.00
12840 12/02/93 000105 AEI SECURITY, iNC. INSTALL PANIC BUTTON 340-199-999-5242
12841 12/02/93 000116 AVP VISION PLANS INS PREMIUM FOR DEC 199 001-2310
12841 12/02/93 000116 AVP VISION PLANS INS PREMIUM FOR DEC 199 100-2310
12841 12/02/93 000116 AVP VISION PLANS INS PREMIUM FOR DEC 199 190-2310
12841 12/02/93 000116 AVP VISION PLANS INS PREMIUM FOR DEC 199 191-2310
128/t,t---12/02/93 000116 AVP VISION PLANS INS PREMIUM FOR DEC 199 193-2310
128 2/02/93 000116 AVP VISION PLANS INS PREMIUM FOR DEC 199 300-2310
130.00
421.39
127.32
97.15
4.14
5.06
3.94
130.00
VOUCHRE2 I~G~ 2
12/02/93 17:06
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
ITEM ACCOUNT
DESCRIPTZOR NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
12841 12/02/93 000116 AVP VISION PLANS
12841 12/02/93 000116 AVP VISION PLANS
INS PREMIUM FOR DEC 199 330-2310
INS PREMIUM FOR DEC 199 001-1180
31.50
26.95
715.45
128~2.12/02/93 000127 CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL
12842 12102193 000127 CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL
128~.3 12/02/93 000128
12843 12/02/93 000128
12844 12/02/93 000135
128Z,4 12/02/93 000135
12844 12/02/93 000135
128~4 12/02/93 000135
1282,6 12/02/93 000135
12844 12/02/93 000135
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES,
CAL'SURANCE ASSOCIATES,
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING
CITY CLERKS PUBLLIC NOT
LIABILITY-MUN[C~L RENEW
EXCESS LIABILITY REMEWA
18nX26" NO SMOKING SIGN
18MX26p PARK CLOSED SIG
18"X26" PARK 14ATCH SIGN
NO ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES
HANDICAP LOGO
TAX
001-161-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
300-199-999-5200
300-199-999-5200
190-180-999-52~4
190-180-999-5264
190-180-999-52~
190-180-999-52~
190-180-999-52~
190-180-999-5266
69,683.00
32,906.00
320.10
93.75
93.75
93.75
50.58
50.52
102,589.00
702.45
12845 12/02/93 000138 CITICORP NORTH AMERICA PRINCIPAL
128~5 12/02/93 000138 CITICORP NORTH AMERICA INTEREST
320-2800
320-199-;-5391
1,111.51
316.06
1,427.57
128~6 12/02/93 000160 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN DEC 93 INS PREMIUM
128~6 12/02/93 000160 COLOR]AL LIFE & ACCIDEN DEC 93 ]MS PREMIUM
12846 12/02/93 000160 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN DEC 93 INS PREMIUM
128~6 lZ/02/93 000160 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN DEC 93 INS PREMIUM
12846 12/02/93 000160 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN DEC 93 INS PREMIUM
12846 12/02/93 000160 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN DEC 93 INS PREMIUM
001-Z330
100-2330
190-2330
191-2330
193-2330
330-2330
130.75
9.75
132.00
11 .~8
16.02
65. O0
363. O0
12847 12/02/93 000155 DAVLIN VIDEO/AUDIO TAPE 001-100-999-5250
753.93
753.93
12848 12/02/93 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA DEC 93 PREMIUM
12848 12/02/93 000156 DENTZCARE OF CALIFORNIA DEC 93 PREMIUM
12848 12/02/93 000156 DENT/CARE OF CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE FEE
O01-ZSGO
100-23/,0
001-150-999-5250
29.86
16.93
15.00
59.79
12849 12/02/93 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
PRIORITY LTR/PLANNZNG 001-161-999-5230
9.50
9.50
12850 12/02/93 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO PRELIMINARY REPORT 190-180-999-5226
500.00
500.00
12851 12/02/93 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY DAYTIMER BINDER/STEVE Z 001-163-999-5220
12851 12/02/93 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY #10660 JAN 96-DEC 96 FI 001-161-999-5220
12851 12/02/93 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY 1EA #4062 GREEN 001-161-999-5220
12851 12/02/93 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FREIGHT 001-161-999-5220
12851 12/02/93 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY TAX 001-161-999-5220
12851 12/02/93 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY CREDIT/WRONG SIZE 001-160-999-5220
32.84
79.80
5.50
7.95
7.23
69.57-
12852 12/02/93 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO REPL 386SX MB SN 90370 320-199-999-5215
12852 12/02/93 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO MEN FOR ITEM 1 320-199-999-5215
12852 12/02/93 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO REPL 80MB HARD DRIVE 320-199-999-5215
12852 12/02/93 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO REPL IDE & 1/0 CARD 320-199-999-5215
12852 12/02/93 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO TAX 320-199-999-5215
95.0O
176.00
165.00
18.00
33.68
/,65.68
12853 12/02/93 000180 GRAY BAR ELECTRIC BELL SOUTH SUPREMACY 63 320-199-999-5262 177.70
12853 12/02/93 000180 GRAY BAR ELECTRIC FREIGHT 320-199-999-5262 2.61
VOUCHR/~.. CITY OF TENECULA
12/02 17:06 VOtJCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER ZOOS
PAGE 3
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUHiiER NAME DESCR]PT]OR NUHBER
ITEM
AHOUNT
CHECK
AHOUNT
12853 12/02/93 000180 GRAY BAR ELECTRIC TAX 320-1~-~)9-5242
13.78
194.0~
12854 12/02/93 000184 GTE ~1)~-6~-0128 NOV 320-1~-~-5208
12855 12102193 000194 ICNA RETIREHENT TRUST 4 00019~ DEF CONP 001-2080
12855 12/02/93 000194 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 000194 DEF CONP 100-2080
12855 12/02/93 0001~ IC34A RETIREMENT TRUST 4 0001~4 DEF COHP 1~0-2080
12855 12/02/~3 0001~ IOIA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 000194 DEF CaRP 191-2080
12855 12/02/93 0001~4 IClIA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 O001W, DEF CORP lg3-2080
12855 12/02/93 0001~, ]CMA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 0001~, DEF COHP 300-2080
12855 12/02/93 0001~ ]CNA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 0001~, DEF COIIP 330-2080
703.37
2,166.01
564.16
496.96
34.08
41.66
25.36
50.00
703.37
3,378.23
12856 12/02/93 000206 KINKO'S COPIES HIS( COPY WORK 001-110-999-5222
12856 12/02/93 000206 KINKO'S COPIES EMERGENCY TEAH PRINTING 001-110-~9-5222
12856 12/02/93 000206 KINKO'S COPIES HIS(, PRINTING SERVICES 330-199-9~9-5220
21.55
133.61
22.51
12857 12/02/93 000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATER]NG CITY COUNCIL MTGS FOOD 001-100-~-5260
52.00
52.00
12858 12/02/93 000220 NAURZCE PRINTERS QUICK NEIGHBORHO(X) HEMSLETTER 001-170-g~-5222
239.21
239.21
12859 12/02/93 000228 MC!IL OCT GAS CREDIT CARDS 001-162-999-5263
128~""~2/02/93 000228 MOBIL OCT GAS CREDIT CARDS 190-180-~-5263
128~ Z/02/93 000228 MOBIL OCT GAS CREDIT CARDS 100-164-~9~-5263
12859 12/02/93 000228 MOBIL OCT GAS CREDIT CARDS 320-1~-~-5262
40.83
123.48
12.91
17.11
194.33
12860 12/02/93 000243 PAYLESS DRUG STORE KOOAK SLIDE FILM 001-162-94~-5250
7,83
12861 12/02/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN DEC 93 PREMIUM 001-2090 13,658.09
12861 12/02/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM DEC 93 PREMIUM 100-20g0 3,674.27
12861 12/02/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM DEC 93 PREMIUM 190-2090 3,981.8/,
12861 12/02/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM DEC 93 PREMIIJH 191-2090 135.95
12861 12/02/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM DEC 93 PREMIUM 193"2090 469.74
12861 12/02/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM DEC 93 PREMIUM 300-2090 143.88
12861 12/02/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM DEC 93 PREMIUM 330-2090 i'25.0~
12861 12/02/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM ADMIN FEE 001-150-999-5250 119.45
12862 12/02/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 0002~6 PER REDE 001-2130
12862 12/02/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PER REDE 100-2130
12862 12/02/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 001-2390
12862 12/02/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 100-23g0
12862 12/02/93 0002/,6 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 1~0-23~0
12862 12/02/93 000246 PERS EHPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 191-2390
12862 12/02/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RET%REM 0002~6 PERS RET 193-2390
12862 12/02/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RET%REM 000246 PERS RET 300-2390
12862 12/02/93 000246 PERS EHPLOYEES' RET/REM 000246 PERS RET 320-2390
12862 12/02/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETZREM 000246 PERS RET 330-2390
12862 12/02/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 001-23g0
12862 12/02/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 100-23~0
12862 12/02/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390
128(y~--32/02/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 191-2390
128 2/02/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390
107.35
107.35
11,294.10
2,552.9~,
2,459.76
80.06
284.39
94.19
232.35
226.87
50.24
11.61
13,02
1.~4
VOUCHRE2 CiTY OF TERECULA
12/02/93 17:06 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR I TEN ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRiPTiON NUMBER
iTEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
12862 12/02/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETiREN 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390
12862 12/02/~ 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES, RET[REN 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390
12862 12/02/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390
12845] 12/02/9] 000249 PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CJ~SH 001-161-~-5260
1286] 12/02/93 000249 PETTY CASH CiTY PETTY CASH 001-150-999-5220
12.~ 12/02/~3 000249 PETTY CASH CiTY PETTY CASH 001-150-~-5260
12863 12/02/93 000249 PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH 001-100-999-5265
12863 12/02/93 000249 PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH 100-164-~-5218
128~3 12/02/93 000249 PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH 001-163-9~-52~0
128(~ 12/02/93 000249 PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH 001-140-999-5260
12863 12/02/93 000249 PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH 280-199-999-526~
12863 12/02/93 000249 PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH 001-100-999-5260
12863 12/02/93 000249 PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH 001-161-~-5220
12863 12/02/93 000249 PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH 001-100-~-5258
12863 12/02/93 000249 PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH 001-100-99~-5220
12863 12/02/93 000249 PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH 001-140-99~-5261
1286~ 12/02/93 000249 PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH 001-140-999-5220
12863 12/02/93 000249 PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH 001-110-999-5260
.46
.93
1.1~
.36.49
8.78
20.~3
8.06
29.76
12.01
20.00
15.42
25.00
25.10
22.00
15.26
7.00
27.19
34.91
17,519.34
307.61
128~4 12/02/93 000253 POSTHASTER EXPRESS HAIL/OCT-NOV 001-161-999-5230
12865 12/02/93 000305 TARGET STORE REC SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5301
15.95
98.96
15 .~5
128&5 12/02/93 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY POOL TROPHIES 190-182-999-5301
12866 12/02/93 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY GOLF TOURN PLAQUES 001-2172
12866 12/02/93 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY 7 SPORTS PLAOUES 001-2172
25.86
166.50
136.68
329.04
12867 12/02/93 000308 TEMECULA TO~NE ASSOCIAT OCT RENT/FLOOR CARE SEP 001-100-~-5234
128&7 12/02/93 000308 TEMECULA TO~NE ASSOCIAT NOV RENT/OCT FLOOR CARE 001-100-~9-523~,
744.00
696.00
1,/~0.00
12868 12/02/93 000317 THORSBORNE, ALICIA REIMB SEMINAR EXPENSE 001-140-999-5261
47.~
47.~
128459 12/02/93 000320 TOWN CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-163-999-5220
lZ869 12/02/93 000320 TOUN CENTER STATIONERS PENS & APPT BO0~ 190-180-999-5301
12869 12/02/93 000320 TCNN CENTER STATIONERS 2 BUSINESS CARD FILES 001-163-999-5220
22.58
15.51
25.(~
12870 12/02/93 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UW 001-2120
12870 12/02/93 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UW 190-2120
87.00
17.50
10~.50
12871 12/02/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE CLEAN UNIFORMS 100-1&z,-~-5243
12871 12/02/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE CLEAN UNIFORMS 100-16~-~-5243
12871 12/02/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORM RENTAL 190-180-999-5243
12871 12/02/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORM RENTAL 190-180-~-5243
12871 12/02/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE FLOOR HAT SERVICES; CIT 32,0-199-~-5250
Z~.O0
23.00
16.10
19.60
34.50
116.20
12872 12/02/93 000340 WHITE CAP PLASTER ADHESIVE/CLEAN 100-164-999-5242
12872 12/02/93 000340 WHITE CAP TAX 100-164-999-5242
12872 12/02/93 000340 WHITE CAP HAG FLASH LIGHTS & BATT 100-164-999-5242
12872 12/02/93 000340 WHITE CAP "GOOF OFF" GRAFFITI REM 100'164'~'5242
12872 12/02/93 000340 WHITE CAP TAX 100"164'~9~'5242
11.00
.2~
17.00
29.68
5.0~
VOUCHR/KZ~ CITY OF TENECULA
lZ/OZ' 17:06 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUliER NAME DESCR]PT]OR
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AIqOgNT
12873 12/02/93 000:$/,2 MINDSOR PARTNERS - RANC DEC RENT 340-1~-~-52.~
12874 12/02/93 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI LEASE AGREEMENT; 5100 C :~J0-1~-~-5219
12875 12/02/93 000~8 ZIGLER, GAlL DIRECTOR'S LUNCHEON 001-110-999-5260
29,798,92
2,969.95
250.00
29,798.92
2,969.95
250.00
12876 12/02/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 10/26/93-11/23/93
1287& 12/02/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 10/26-11/23
12876 12/02/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 10/26-11/23
12876 12/02/93 000374 SOUTHERN CAL]F EDISON 10/26-11/23
3~0-199-999-5240
190-182-999-5240
190-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
3,114.86
300.33
2,623.52
367.57
6,406.28
12877 12/02/93 000387 CAREER TRACK SEMINARS M TRAINING gORKSHOP
190-180-999-5258
98,00
98.00
12878 12/02/93 000389 USCN/PEBSCO, COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
12878 12/02/93 000389 USON/PEBSCO, (ORRA) 000389 PT RETIR
12878 12/02/93 000389 USClq/PEBSCO, (ORRA) 000389 PT RETIR
001-2160
100-2160
190-2160
32.24
147.96
137.26
317.46
12879 12/02/93 000/,09
12879 12/02/93 000~09
12879 12/02/93 000409
12879 12/02/93 000/,09
128& Z/02/93 000413
12880 12/02/93 0004 13
12880 12/02/93 000413
VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY
VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY
VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY
VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT 0
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT 0
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT 0
AD1 AD ZORB 50 LBD BAGS
FREIGHT
TAX
CREDIT FOR FREIGHT
PERMIT FEE/RA CA RD CHA
PERMIT FEE/SAI)DLEIdOOD A
PERMIT FEE/SPORTS PARK
100-16~-999-5Z18
100-164-999-5218
100-164-999-5218
100-164-999-5218
193-180-999-5250
193-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
597.60
271.26
46.32
135.63-
132.00
132.00
132.00
779.55
3~. O0
12881 12/02/93 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA DEC 93 PREMIUM 001-2510
12881 12/02/93 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA DEC 93 PREMIUM 100-2510
12881 12/02/93 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA DEC 93 PREMIUM 190-2510
257.80
22.80
89.00
369.60
12882 12/02/93 000431 NAT]ORAL DENTAL HEALTH, DEC 93 PREMIUM 001'23/,0
12882 12/02/93 000431 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, DEC 93 PREMIUM 100"23~0
12882 12/02/93 000431 NAT/ORAL DENTAL HEALTH, DEC 93 PREMIUM 190'23~0
12882 12/02/93 000431 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, DEC 93 PREMILIN 191'2340
12882 12/02/93 000431 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, DEC 93 PREMIUM 193"2340
12882 12/02/93 000431 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, DEC 93 PREMIUM 300'23~0
12882 12/02/93 000431 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, DEC 93 PREMIUM 330"23~0
12882 12/02/93 000431 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, COBRA 001-1180
12882 lZ/02/93 000431 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, ADMIN FEE 001'150"999-5250
12883 12/02/93 000545 PAC TEL CELLULAR - S.O. SC-1075255 OCT/NOV 001-140-999-5208
~5.33
154.3~
130.00
7.31
8.94
4.06
32.50
48.75
15 .O0
142.20
1,006.25
142.20
12884 12/02/93 000558 ADVANCED MOBILECONN PALONAR MOBILE COVERAGE 320-199-999-5209
225.00
225.00
12885 12/02/93 000587 NUNOZ, NARIO
SENIOR CTR JARITORIAL 190-181-999-5250
180.00
180.00
12886 12/02/93 000636 FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT A 94 MEMBERSHIP
001-163-999-5226
30.00
30.00
12887 12/02/93 000642 CITY OF TEMEOULA - FLEX REINB FLEX BENEFITS 001-1020
12887---12/02/93 000642 CITY OF TEMEOULA - FLEX RE]NIt FLEX BENEFITS 190-1020
12~ 2/02/93 000642 CITY OF TEMEOULA - FLEX RE]NIl FLEX BENEFITS 100-1020
3,050.72
726.66
50.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA
1Z/02/93 17:06 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERZOOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
flUfiBER DATE NUNBER NANE DESCRIPTION NUfiBER
ITEH
AHOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
12887 12/02/93 000(~2 CITY OF TEHECULA - FLEX REIHB FLEX BENEFITS 300-1020
12887 12/02/93 000642 CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX REINB FLEX BENEFITS 330-1020
12888.12/02/93 000653 LUCKY STORE COOKIE HONSTOR/CHRISTHA 190-183-~-5320
21.24
16.25
'(>0. O0
3,864.87
60.00
12889 12/02/93 000667 P.A.P.A. PESTICIDE TRAINING 190-180-~-5258
12~90 12/02/93 000674 CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CIT SACRAHENTO LEGISLATIVE 001-100-~-5258
45.00
350.00
45.00
350.00
12891 12/02/93 000697 TOHN AFFILIATION ASSOCl DEC 93-NOV 94 ANNUAL ME 001-100-~-5226
380.00
380.00
128~2 12/02/fJ O006fq CPOA 1~4 LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 001-170-~-5261
39.OO
39,00
128FJ 12/02/93 000702 CADDY GRAPHICS/LENORA H TRI-FOLD BROCHURE
12893 12/02/93 000702 CADDY GRAPHICS/LENORA H VOLUNTEER BROCHURE
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
110.00
60.00
170.00
12894 12/02/93 000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 100-164-~-52d3
12894 12/02/93 000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 001-162-~-52~3
12894 12/02/93 000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 1~0-180-~-52~3
12894 12/02/93 000704 SKS, [NC./INLAND OIL FUEL 001-110-~-5262
12895 12/02/93 000724 A & R CUSTON SCREEN PRI ALLSTAR SHIRTS 190-183-999-5380
12896 12/02/93 0007~0 EDVALSON, HARWOOD REIND. FRANKLIN CALENDA 001-110-~-5220
~8.88
40.83
61.39
40.45
47.30
591.55
'~'~ 75
47.30
12897 12/02/93 000732 G & F CARRIAGES
CARRIAGES/BKFT w SANTA 190-183-999-5370
350.00
350.00
12898 12/02/93 000733 PARTY PZAZZ
CHAIR RENTAL/BKFT V SAN 190-18~-999-5370
47.82
47.82
12899 12/02/93 000743 TAYLOR, BOB
SANTA/BKFT v SANTA 190-183-~g~-5370
50.00
50.00
12900 12/02/93 000765 GROUP AHERICA LIFElAD&I) DEC 93 PRENIU 001-2~0
12900 12/02/93 000765 GROUP ANERICA LIFE/AD&D DEC 93 PRENIU 100-2360
12900 12/02/93 000765 GROUP AHERICA LIFE/AD&D DEC 93 PRENIU 1~0-2360
12900 12/02/93 000765 GROUP AHERICA LIFE/AD&i) DEC 93 PREMIU 191-2360
12900 12/02/93 000765 GROUP ANERICA LIFE/AD&I) DEC 93 PRENIU 193-2360
12900 12/02/93 000765 GROUP ANERICA LIFE/AD&D DEC 93 PREMIU 300-2360
12900 12/02/93 000765 GROUP ANERZCA LIFE/AD&D DEC 93 PREMIU 320-2360
12900 12/02/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA LIFE/AD&D DEC 93 PREMZU 330-2360
12900 12/02/93 000765 GROUP AHERICA LTD DEC 93 PREHIUfi 001-2380
12900 12/02/93 000765 GROUP ANERICA LTD DEC f~ PRENIUfi 100-2380
12900 12/02/93 000765 GROUP AHERICA LTD DEC 93 PREMIUfi 190-2380
12~00 12/02/93 000765 GROUP ANERZCA LTD DEC 93 PREMIUfi 191-2380
12900 12/02/93 000765 GRDUP AMERICA LTD DEC 93 PRENIUfi 193-2380
12900 12/02/93 000765 GROUP AHERICA LTD DEC 93 PRENIUfi 300-2380
12900 12/02/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA LTD DEC 93 PRENIUfi 320-2]80
12900 12/02/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA LTD DEC 93 PRENIUN 330-2380
12~00 12/02/93 000765 GROUP AHERICA STD DEC 93 PREMIIJ!4 001-2500
12~00 12/02/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA STD DEC 93 PRENIIJH 100-2500
12~00 12/02/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA STD DEC 93 PRENII.14 1~0-2500
12900 12/02/93 000765 GROUP AHER/CA STD DEC 93 PREM/Ufi 191-2500
570.00
118.75
133.00
4.28
14.72
4.75
9.50
19.00
932.70
214.~
194.67
5.89
20.91
7.76
18.67
18.59
202.01
46.8~
42.82
1.30
/CO~,` CITY OF TENECULA
17:0& VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NLINBER DATE NUI~R MANE DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
12900 12/02/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA STD DEC 93 PREMIUM 193-2500
12900 12/02/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA $TD DEC 93 PREMIUM 300-2500
12900 12/02/93 000765 GROUP AMER/CA STD DEC 93 PREMIUM 320-2500
12900 12/02/93 000765 GROUP AMER]CA STD DEC 93 PREMIUM 330-2500
4.60
1.71
4.11
4.09
2,595.76
12901 12/02/93 000863 McOANIEL ENGINEERING CO AMENDMENT NO. 1 FOR Pg9 210-166-627-5802
12~02 12/02/93 000860 JOCHUM, LORI CONTRACT CLASS PAYMENT 190-183-999-5330
106.50
196.00
106.50
196.00
12903 12/02/93 000883 NONTELECHE EXCAVATING EXTRA gORK ON JOHN gARN 100-164-999-5401
12903 12/02/93 000883 NONTELEORE EXCAVATING t~3RK ORDER 93-94 #58 100-16~-999-5401
12903 12/02/93 000883 NONTELEONE EXCAVATING MO~K ORDER 93-94 t52 100-164-999-5401
12903 12/02/93 000883 NONTELEORE EXCAVATING i,a3RK ORDER 93-94 &'54 100-164-999-5402
12903 12/02/93 000883 NONTELEORE EXCAVATING JOHN gARNER ROAD 100-164-999-5402
12903 12/02/93 000883 NONTELEONE EXCAVATING gORK ORDER 93-94 tNS4 100-164-999-5401
890.00
950.00
1,950.00
950.00
800.00
9,700.00
15,240.00
12904 12/02/93 000907 TEMECULA CAR gASH OIL CHANGES/CAR gASHES 310-162-999-5214
12904 12/02/93 000907 TEMECULA CAR gASH OIL CHANGES/CAR gASHES 310-180-999-5214
12904 12/02/93 000907 TENECULA CAR gASH OIL CHANGES/CAR gASHES 310-164-999-5214
4.00
8.00
29.03
41.0~
12905 12/02/93 000915
12~ 2/02/93 000927
12906 12/02/93 000927
NAT]CHAL NOTARY ASSOCIA
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES,
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES,
SEMINAR/JAN 27 001-120-999-5260
SPORTS PARK CONSTRUCTIO 250-190-129-5804
SOIL TECHNICIAN 250-190-129-580~
196.00
872.00
64.00
196.00
936. O0
12907 12/02/93 000962 ICMA - DUES
1994 MEMBERSHIP DUES 001-110-999-5226
579.24
579.24
12908 12/02/93 000980 COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5212
12908 12/02/93 000980 COAST IRRIGATZCH SUPPLY gILKINS TUBE & FITTING 190-180-999-5212
12908 12/02/93 000980 COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY IRRIGATION PARTS 190-180-999-5212
103.98
6.63
57.76
168.37
12909 12/02/93 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5473666~03910032 OCT MJ 001-140-999-5260
41.42
41.42
12910 12/02/93 001014 COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS CONSTRUCT & INSTALL SIG 210-190-13~-5804
12911 12/02/93 001030 MINI-GRAPHIC SYSTEMS, Z STORAGE BOXES
12911 lZ/02/93 001030 MINI-GRAPHIC SYSTEMS, Z PROCESSING 16NNXlO0
001-120-999-5250
001-120-999-5250
60.34
25.96
86.30
12912 12/02/93 001057 PRO-SCAPE, INC. REFUND OF BONDS ON MAIN 190-2640
4,048.92
4,048.92
12913 12/02/93 001065 USCN/PEBSCO (DEF. COHP. 001065 DEF CONP 001-2080
12913 12/02/93 001065 USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065 DEF COMP 100-2080
12913 12/02/93 001065 USCH/PEBSCO (DEF. CUMP. 001065 DEF CORP 190-2080
12913 12/02/93 001065 USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065 DEF CONP 300-2080
12913 12/02/93 001065 USCN/PEBSOD (DEF. CORP. 001065 DEF CONP 320-2080
3,367.15
147.98
156.32
3.47
312.50
3,987.42
12914 12/02/93 001098 GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL EQUIP 5160024; LUMBAR SUPPORT 001-120-999-5220
12914 12/02/93 001098 GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL EOUIP FREIGHT 001-120-999-5220
12914 12/02/93 001098 GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL ECRJIP TAX 001-120-999-5220
12~/'' 2/02/93 001122 SCOTCH PAINT CORPORATIO RAGS FOR CLEANUP 100-164-999-5218
25.50
5.00
1.53
37.39
32.03
37.39
VOUCHRE2 EA~ 8
12/02/93 17:06
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
12916
12916
12917
12917
12917
12919
12920
12920
12921
12922
12923
12924
12925
12926
12926
12926
12926
12926
12927
12927
12927
12927
12927
12927
12927
12927
12928
12929
12930
12931
12932
12933
CHECK
DATE
12/02/93
12/02/93
.12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
12/02/93
VENDOR VENDOR
NUNBER NAME
001123 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE
001123 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE
001164 GABRIEL, RICHARD
001164 GABRIEL, RICHARD
001164 GABRIEL, RICHARD
001185 CPRS OISTRICT Xl/RANCHO
001196 AFFAIR, THE
001197 CHOCOLATE FLORIST, THE
001197 CHOCOLATE FLORIST, THE
001200 NPELRA
001206 PACIFIC SOUTHWEST BIOLO
001213 NURRIETA MOTORSPORTS
001214 MORNINGSTAR PRODUCT]ORS
001218 BANK OF CDMMERCE
001219 TEMECULA VALLEY LASER R
001219 TEMECULA VALLEY LASER R
001219 TEMECULA VALLEY LASER R
001219 TEMECULA VALLEY LASER R
001219 TEMECULA VALLEY LASER R
001222 ALPHA CONNJNICATIONS
001222 ALPHA CUMNUNICATIONS
001222 ALPHA COleNJNICATZONS
001222 ALPHA COMMUNICATIONS
001222 ALPHA COINJNICATIONS
001222 ALPHA COII~NICATIONS
001222 ALPHA COIIeJNICATIONS
001222 ALPHA COMMUNICATIONS
001225 OPR
001233 DAN'S FEED
0012.~, JINNEY'S COFFEE HOUSE
001235 QUEEN'S PRINTER
001236 AMERICAN MATER RESOURCE
001237 CPRS
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
I TEN
DE SCR I PT ! OR
31HI16 X 5/8 STAINLESS
TAX
LEASE AGREEMENT WlTH/CI
LEASE AGREEMENT WlTH/CI
LEASE AGREEMENT WlTH/CI
td3RKSHOP
SPORSOR AND OIONITARY P
AMENITIES FOR DIGNITARI
AMENITZES FOR DIGN]TARI
199/, MEMBERSHIP
P~93-09 PARKVIEW SITE
REPAIR SIREN SWITCH OR
SOUND SYSTEM
TRW~'S
COULING FAN FOR HP IZI
TAX
OZONE FILTER FOR HP ZI!
SERVICE - CLEANING
TAX
PAGERS
PAGERS
PAGERS
PAGERS
PAGERS
PAGERS
PAGERS
REFERRAL FEE
FOUR PUBLICATiONS
HAY FOR CHRISTMAS SN(Yd
VOLUNTEERS REFRESHMENTS
STREAM RESTORATION PROG
SHALL STREAM MANAGEMENT
STATE CORF AWARDS
TOTAL CHECKS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
100-164-999-5218
100-164-999-5218
310-164-999-52.~
310-180-999-5234
310-162-999-52.~
190-180-999-5258
190-18~-999-5370
190-183-999-5370
190-183-999-5370
001-150-999-5226
210-199-128-5802
001-170-999-5214
190-18~-999-5370
280-199-999-5250
320-199-999-5215
320-199-999-5215
320-199-999-5215
320-199-999-5215
320-199-999-5215
190-180-999-5238
001-162-999-5238
320-199-999-5238
100-164-999-5238
100-164-999-5238
001-170-999-5242
001-140-999-5250
190-180-999-5238
001-161-999-5228
190-180-999-5370
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5228
190-180-999-5228
190-180-999-5258
ITEM
AMOUNT
160.00
12.40
1,050.00
735.00
315.00
75.00
210.00
22.60
119.30
160.00
500.00
50.00
834.88
27.00
65. O0
5.06
35. O0
360.00
2.71
88.00
33.00
11.00
55. O0
18.33
7.33
10.00-
18.00
75.00
85. O0
3.82
7.00
55.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
1~.40
2,100.00
75.00
210.00
141.90
1~.00
500.00
50.00
.~0
467.75
210.00
18.00
~.00
7.00
~:~0
265,292.18
VOUCHP.~.,
12/O:Y
11:31
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAGE
FUND
001
100
190
193
21,0
250
280
300
320
330
TITLE
GENERAL FUND
GAS TAX FUND
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD
REDEVELOPt4ENT AGENCY - CIP
INSURANCE FUND
INFORHATION SYSTENS
COPY CENTER FUND
TOTAL
ANOUNT
1,215,072.91
91,200.50
20,492.95
13,272.15
35,609.27
6,000.00
21,7~4.55
10,754.81
9,520.52
1,192.06
1,42Z~,~N)~.72
VOUCHRE2
12/03/93 11:31
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
12941
12942
12942
12943
129~3
12943
12943
12943
12943
12943
12943
12943
12944
12945
12945
12945
12945
12945
12945
12945
12945
12946
12947
12947
12947
12948
12949
12950
12951
12951
12951
12951
12951
12951
12951
12951
12951
12951
12951
12951
12951
CHECK
DATE
12/14/93
12/14/93
,12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
VENDOR
NUMBER
000107
000107
000123
000123
000123
000123
000123
000123
000123
000123
000123
000126
000131
000131
000131
000131
000131
000131
000131
000131
000230
000238
000238
000238
000251
000271
000276
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
CITY OF TEMECULA
V(NJCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
NAME DESCR%PTION NUMBER AMOUNT
BIGPOND, TONYA AND JACK
ALHAMBRA GROUP
ALHAMBRA GROUP
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS
BURKE WILLlAWS & SORENS
BURKE WILLlAWS & SORENS
BURKE WILLlAWS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS
BURKE WILLJAMS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CARL WARREN & CO.
CARL WARREN & CO.
CARL WARREN & CO.
CARL WARREN & CO.
CARL WARREN & CO.
CARL WARREN & CO.
CARL WARREN & CO.
CARL WARREN & CO.
MUNI F]NANCIAL SERVICES
FINAL TOUCH MARKETING
FINAL TOUCH MARKETING
FINAL TOUCH MARKETING
PLANNING CENTER, THE
ROBERT BEIN, ~ FROST &
PURKISS ROBE
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
**BIGPOND T & J DOL 07/300-199-999-5207
LONA LINDA PARK PHASE 2 210-190-134-5802
RIVERTON PARK/F]ELD 210-190-131-5804
OCT LEGAL SERVICES
OCT. LEGAL SERVICES
OCT LEGAL SERVICES
OCT LEGAL SERVICES
OCT LEGAL SERVICES
OCT LEGAL SERVICES
OCT LEGAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
WAL-NART REFERENDUM
001-130-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
001-1280
300-199-999-5207
190-180-999-5246
280-199-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
280-199-999-5246
NOV 1993 LANDSCP MAINTE 190-180-999-5250
HEMERT, ERNIE DOL 05/22 300-199-999-5205
BUTZIGER, LINDA DOL 08/ 300-199-999-5205
MAJEWSK], CRAIG DOL 02/ 300-199-999-5205
OMEGA PRINT DOL 01/16/9 300-199-999-5205
AMMONS, JOHN DOL 07/06/300-199-999-5205
SPIVEY, JANET DOL 06/17 300-199-999-5205
ROCKY MT HOUSE DOL 01/1 300-199-999-5205
BIGPOND, DOL 7/31/93 300-199-999-5205
CSD ADMIN SERVICES 190-180-999-5370
DEC 93 MEDIA AD PLACEME
MARKETING PROGRAM CONTR
FINAL TOUCH
280-199-999-5264
280-199-999-5264
280-199-999-5264
CODE AUGNENTATION/GENER 001-161-999-5248
DESIGN OF HARGARITA RD. 210-165-606-5802
MASTER PLAN JOB 91-115 190-180-999-5248
5000 BUSINESS LICENSE
2 BOXES GOLD FOIL BUS.
2 BOXES BLACK/WHITE BUS
2 BOXES BLACK/WHITE BUS
2 BOXES GOLD FOIL BUS.
1 BOX BLACK/WHITE BUS.
1 BOX BLACK\WHITE BUS.
1 BOX BLACK\WH/TE BUS.
2 BOXES BLACK\WH]TE BUS
2 BOXES GOLD FOIL BUS,
2 BOXES BLACK/WHITE BUS
2 BOXES BLACK\WHITE BUS
2 BOX BLACK\WHITE BUS.
001-140-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-16~-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-165-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-165-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
2,193.48
3,400.00
200.00
3,150.00
2,750.11
12,754.23
195.50
6,723.30
2,622.50
3,788.65
9,386.64
73~.25
4,523.36
58.88
267.63
153.63
222.88
256.38
186.00
582.38
110.25
1,504.58
9,605.00
1,166.67
1,500.00
1,268.97
2,427.86
2,029.07
1,218.58
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
55.40
50.00
50,00
42.70
20.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,193.48
3,600.00
42,085.16
4,523.36
1,838.03
1,504.58
12,271.67
1,268.97
2,427.86
2,029.07
VOUCHR~ CITY OF TENECULA
12/0~" 11:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NtlNBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NIJHBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHE~
AMOUNT
12951 12/1A/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY 2 BOXES GOLD FOIL BUS. O01-163-~j~-5220
12951 12/1A/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY TAX 001-1(G-~-5220
12951 12/1~/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY 500 BUSINESS CARDS; COL 190-180-999-5220
12~51 . 12/1~/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY TAX 190-180-~-5220
20.00
39.77
27.71
2.15
1,801.31
12952 12/1~/93 000~32 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATZ PLAN CHECKS OCT 1993 001-162-999-52~8
12752 12/1~/93 000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCZATI PLAN CHECKS FOR TRACT H 001-162-~-5248
932.83
6,561.0~
7,/,93.87
12953 12/14/93 000365 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI METER USAGE; 5100 COPIE 330-1~-~-52~9
12954 12/14/93 000/,06 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF TRAFFIC CONTROL/YNEZ CO 001-1280
12956 12/16/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHER]F JUNE LAU ENFORCEMENT 001-170-~-5P..82
12956 12/16/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF JUNE LAg ENFORCEMENT 001-170-~q~-5288
12~5~ 12/1~/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF JUNE LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-~-52~
1295A 12/16/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF JUNE LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-~-52~8
1295~ 12/1A/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF JUNE LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-~-5290
12956 12/1~/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF JUNE LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-~-5281
12954 12/1~/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF JUNE LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-~-5262
12956 12/14/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF JUNE LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-12~0
1295~ 12/1A/93 000406 RIVERS]DE COUNTY SHERIF JUNE LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-~-5291
12954 12/1~/93 00060& RIVERS]DE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFORCEMENT/SEPT 19 001-170-~-5288
129r/~'?/1~/93 000606 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFORCEMENT/SEPT 19 001-170-~-52~
129~ 2/1A/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFORCEMENT/SEPT 19 001-170-~-52~8
12~54 12/16/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFORCEMENT/SEPT 19 001-170-~-52~0
12~54 12/16/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHER]F LAW ENFORCEMENT/SEPT 19 001-170-~-5282
12954 12/1~/93 000606 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHER]F LAW ENFORCEMENT/SEPT 19 001-170-~-52~1
12956 12/14/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHER]F LAW ENFORCEMENT/SEPT 19 001-1P..~0
12954 12/14/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFORCEMENT/SEPT 19 001-170-~99-5262
12954 12/16/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SNERIF LAW ENFORCEMENT/SEPT 19 001-170-~-5281
12954 12/14/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHER]F LAW ENFORCERENT AUGUST 001-170-~-5288
1295A 12/16/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHER]F LAW ENFORCERENT AUGUST 001-170-~-52~
12954 12/1~/93 O0060& RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFORCERENT AUGUST 001-170-~-5298
12954 12/1A/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFORCEMENT AUGUST 001-170-~-5290
1295A 12/16/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFORCEMENT AUGUST 001-170-~-5282
12954 12/1~193 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFORCERENT AUCOST 001-170-~-5281
1295~ 12/14/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHER[F LAW ENFORCEMENT AUGUST 001-170-~-5262
1295A 12/14/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF MOTORCROSS TRACK TRAFFI 1~0-180-~-5250
12954 12/14/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERZF LAW ENFORCEMENT/JULY 001-170-~-5288
12954 12/16/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFORCEMENT/JULY 001-170-~-52~
12954 12/14/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFORCEMENT/JULY 001-170-9~-5298
12~54 12/1~/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFORCEMENT/JULY 001-170-~-52~0
12954 12/1A/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFORCEMENT/JULY 001-170-~-5291
12954 12/14/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SNER]F LAW ENFORCEMENT/JULY 001-1P,~0
12954 12/16/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFORCEMENT/JULY 001-170-9~-5281
12954 12/1~/93 000~06 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAU ENFORCEMENT/JULY 001-170-~q~-5282
12954 12/1~/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHER/F LAW ENFORCEMENT/JULY 001-170-~-5262
12955 12/1~/93 000A26 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL SANDBAGS iN PREPARAT]OR 100-164-~-5218
12955 12/1~/93 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL TAX 100-164-~-5218
12952---12/1~/93 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 190-180-~-5212
1,192.06
1,071.86
2,928.29
208,Tf5.93
6,398.84
10,760.2]
4,2~2.84
12,716,~9
16,589.52
2,937.~5
2,937.A~
199,~78.11
18,018.61
19,865.04
4,670.72
2,~55.15
~,962.6~,
A,962.6/.
15,668.90
18,29().98
201,961.2~
18,336.96
21,667.80
6,422.26
2,865.60
14,728,~5
15,~88.66
165.92
213,517.35
20,565.61
20,915.60
875.76
875.76
12,896.52
3,008,88
16,120.20
1,800.00
139.50
52.58
1,192.06
1,133,263.05
1,~2.08
VOUCHRE2
12/03/93
11:31
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOtJCHER/
CHECK
~JMBER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAHE
ITEM
DESCR/PTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
12956
12957
12958
12958
12958
12958
12959
12959
1~959
12959
1295 9
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
000606
000655
000?93
0007V3
0007V3
000793
000820
000820
000820
000820
000820
RIVERSIDE COUNTY ADMIN.
MENTONE TURF SUPPLY
SCANTRON CORPORATION
$CANTRON CORPORATIOR
SCANTRON CORPORATION
SCANTRON CORPORATION
WINCNAKe KRIS
glNCHAK, KRIS
WINCHAK, KItIS
WINCHAK, KRIS
WINCHAK, KRIS
93-94 2 QTRS//NS SYSTEM
RETENTION
SCANTRON FORM NO. F-473
HANDLING
FREIGHT CHARGES
TAX
CREDIT BORKERS CONP
LIEFER ROAD AT NIODLAS
LANDSCAPE EASEHENTS
PLAN CHECKS & REVIEWS
OVERFLO~ IMPROVEMENT &
001-170-99~-5325
210-2035
001-162-999-5222
001-162-999-5222
001-162-999-5222
001-162-999-5222
001-1182
210-16&-627-5802
190-180-999-5250
001-163-99g-5249
001-163-~-5249
19,028.00
1,790.49
1,192.00
3.20
42.31
86.42
331.74-
62.50
1,610.00
2,737.50
512.50
19,028.00
1,790.49
1,323.93
6,590.76
12960
12960
12960
12960
12961
12961
12961
12961
12961
12961
12962
12962
12962
12962
12962
12963
12963
12963
12963
12963
12963
12963
12963
12964
12965
12965
12965
12966
12966
12966
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/16/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
12/14/93
000881
000881
000881
000881
000883
000883
000883
000883
000883
000883
001007
001007
001007
001007
001007
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001058
001119
001119
001119
001125
001125
001125
OAKRIDGE LANDSCAPE/IRRI
OAKRIDGE LANDSCAPE/IRRI
OAKRIDGE LANDSCAPE/IRR]
OAKRIDGE LANDSCAPE/IRRI
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
NONTELEONE EXCAVATING
HONTELEONE EXCAVATING
NONTELEONE EXCAVATING
NONTELEONE EXCAVATING
NPG CORP.
NPG CORP.
NPG CORP.
NPG CORP.
NPG CORP.
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
ACCURATE LANDSCAPE
HOUSTON PIPE CLEANING
HOUSTON PIPE CLEANING
HOUSTON PIPE CLEANING
DIGITAL TELECONNUNICAT[
DIGITAL TELECONNIJNICAT[
DIGITAL TELECOHNUNICATI
LONA LINDA PARK SERVICE
RETENTION
RETENTION
TOP SOIL NOT DELIVERED
WORK ORDER 93-94i56
WORK ORDER 93-9~ #63
WATER TRUCK FOR VIA LOB
30 HOURS WATER TRUCK US
JOHN WARHER ROAD
EXTRA WORK PERFORMED ON
GRADE AND COMPACT NATIV
UORK ORDER t~;r3-94-51
~ORKORDER #93-94-52
WORK ORDER ~-94-49
WORK ORDER ~-94-76
NOV LANDSCAPE NAINT
PRO-RATE OCT LANDSP letl
IRRIGATION REPAIR - SUN
IRRIGATION REPAIR - SIG
IRRIGATION REPAIR - VIL
IRRIGATION REPAIR - SIG
IRRIGATION REPAIR - S]G
REPAIR HAINLINE
NOV 93 LANDSCAPE HAINTE
REMOVE DEBRIS
VIDEO PIPE INSPECTION 0
CLEANING & VIDEO OF 15'
NEC T1 TRUNK CARDS
NEC 2400 CLOCK CARD
NEC PLO CABLE
210-190-13~-580~
210-2035
210-2035
210-190-134-580~
100-164-~-5402
100-164-999-5402
100-164-~9-5402
100-164-999-5402
100-164-999-5402
100-164-~-5402
100-164-999-5401
100-164-999-5402
100-164-999-5402
100-164-999-5401
100-164-999-5402
193-180-gg9-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-9~9-5415
193-180-99q-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
190-180-f99-5250
100-164-999-5401
100-164-9~-5402
100-164-999-5401
320-1950
320-1930
320-1950
320.00
32.00-
3,9O9.7O
500.00-
1,950.00
3,900.00
973.00
1,980.00
25,265.00
642.00
3,030.00
875. O0
675. O0
1,600.00
3,274.00
11,302.24
202.98
138.56
496.82
310.00
379.84
338.80
102.91
6,172.00
140.00
450.00
490.00
6,012.00
2,216.25
607.50
3,697.70
34,692.00
9,454.00
13,272.15
6,172.00
1,080.00
VOUCHR~.~ PAGE
12/03 11:31
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
1296& 12/14/93 001125
1296& 12/14/93 001125
12966 12/14/93 001125
12966 12/14/93 001125
12966 12/14/93 001125
129~7 12/14/93 001131
12967 lZ/1/*/93 001131
12968 12/1/*/93 001133
12968 12/14/93 001133
12968 12/14/93 001133
12968 12/14/93 001133
12~8 12/16/93 001133
12968 12/14/93 001133
12968 12/1/*/93 001133
12968 12/14/93 001133
12968 12/14/93 001133
12969 12/14/93 001147
1297/~"?/14/93 001192
12971 12/14/93 001210
12971 12/14/93 001210
12971 12/14/93 001210
12971 12/14/93 001210
12971 12/14/93 001210
12972 12/16/93 001211
12972 1211~193 001211
VENDOR
NAME
DZGITAL TELECOMMUNZCAT/
DIGITAL TELECONNtJNICATI
DIGITAL TELECONNUNICATI
DZGZTAL TELECONIIJNZCATI
DIGITAL TELECONffiJN[CAT!
GOSNEY CONSTRUCTION BAC
GOSNEY CONSTRUCTION BAC
TREE FOUNDRY
TREE FOUNDRY
TREE FOUMDRY
TREE FOUNDRY
TREE FOUNDRY
TREE FOUNDRY
TREE FOUNDRY
TREE FOUNDRY
TREE FOUNDRY
MURRZETA, CITY OF
K.L.M. EMGINEERZNG
D.R. SCHMIDT CONTRACTOR
D.R. SCHMZDT CONTRACTOR
D.R. SCHNIDT CONTRACTOR
D.R. SCHM[DT CONTRACTOR
D.R. SCHM[DT CONTRACTOR
PROGRESSIVE CONCRETE,
PROGRESSIVE CONCRETE,
CITY OF TEMEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TAX
E-PRO I I ADVANCED KSU
E-PRO Z I ADVANCED KSU
TAX
TAX
Pg92-12 RANCHO VISTA SZ
RETENTION
30:* CAMPHOR
24" CAMPHOR
30" NAONOLIA
24u FRAXINUS
2/*" BRAZ. PEPPER MULTI
2/," BRAZ. PEPPER STD.
FREIGHT
TAX
CRED I T TAX
LABOR MARKET ANALYSIS
MORK ORDER 93-94 tA60 &
MORK ORDER
tJORK ORDER W93-94-73
IdORK ORDER #93-94-71
i~ORK ORDER ~3-94-75
gORK ~DER NO. 93-96-82
MARGARITA S/O WINCHESTE
MIRA LONA a RANCHO VIST
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
320-1930
001-199-999-5603
250 - 190 - 129- 5603
001-199-999-5603
250-190-129-5603
210-165-629-5804
210-20.t5
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
1~0-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180J~9-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-9~9-5212
190-180-999-5212
280-199-999-5266
100-166-999-5402
100-166-999-5/*01
100-164-~99-5402
100-166-999-5402
100-166-999-5402
100-164-999-5401
100-166-999-5402
100-166-999-5402
ITEM
AMOUNT
68~.77
18,519.55
5,568.45
1,435.27
/.31.55
26,700.80
2,670.08'
280.00
70.00
420.00
350.00
70.00
140.00
350.00
103.75
.67-
5,000.00
8,068.00
/*,535.00
2,500.00
9,385.00
3,426.00
9,058.00
2,683.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
35,475.34
24,030.7Z
1,783.08
5,000.00
8,068.00
24,246.00
11,741.00
TOTAL CHECKS
1,424,909.72
ITEM
NO.
4
APPROVAL
C ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM:
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
DATE:
December 14, 1993
SUBJECT:
Combining Balance Sheets as of September 30, 1993 and the Statement
of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings for
the Three Months Ended September 30, 1993.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheets as of September 30, 1993 and
the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, and
the Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings for the
Three Months Ended September 30, 1993.
Appropriate $63,810 in account 001-140-999-5248 "Consulting Services" to
pay a 15% fee for a $425,397 sales tax recovery.
Appropriate $75,000 to account 001-199-999-5610 "Equipment" for the
purchase of video equipment to be located at the Community Recreation
Center.
DISCUSSION:
The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited activity of the City for
the three months ended September 30, 1993.
Please see the attached financial statements for analytical review of financial
activity.
The $63,810 requested appropriation is owed under the terms of a contract for
services between the City and Hinderliter, de Llamas, and Associates. The
agreement calls for a payment by the City of 15% of the amount of any sales
City Manager/City Council
December 14, 1993
tax fund transfers received as a result of their services. In June, 1993 the City
received a sales tax fund transfer that resulted in the receipt of an additional
$425,397 in sales tax revenue.
$75,000 is requested for the purchase of video equipment which will provide
the City with transmission capabilities on public access television. The funding
source for this equipment is a grant of $75,000 received in a prior fiscal year
from Inland Valley Cable Television.
ATTACHMENTS:
Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1993
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balance for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1993
Combining Balance Sheet (Internal Service Funds) as of
September 30, 1993
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained
Earnings for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1993
0 o0 ce-c
~._ 0 X~ ~'
r ~jj X~''~
E
E E
0 ~
ITEM
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
December 14, 1993
Adoption of Travel Policy
RECOMMENDATION:
policy.
That the City Council receive and file the attached travel
DISCUSSION: The attached travel policy will remain unchanged compared to prior
adoption. No alcoholic beverage reimbursement will be made and the City Council will
continue to approve any out of state travel. The City's personnel policies will be
revised to reflect this policy.
Attachments: Administrative Travel: Policy and Procedure
CITY OF TEMECULA
ADMINISTRATIVF TRAVFI: PO! ICY AND PROCFDURE
It is the policy of the City to reimburse City officials and designated City staff for the
expenses of travel related to City business according to the statement of policy and
procedures set forth below.
POLICY
Administrative travel is limited to the following classifications of expenditures for the
benefit of the City in connection with "out-of-City" trips:
A. Authorized Travelers
Except for elected officials, Commissioners, and Council-appointed
employees, attendance at conferences shall be limited to one
representative of the City. The City Manager may authorize the
attendance of additional City employees, if deemed appropriate, if travel
funds are available in the department's operational budget. Any number
of elected officials, Commissioners or Council-appointed employees may
attend conferences provided that funds for such purposes are specifically
provided for, and included within the annual departmental budget. In the
absence of an annual appropriation, such travel must receive
authorization in advance of expenditure by the City Council·
Conference travel for employees shall be limited to department heads,
assistant department heads, division heads or positions of highly
technical or professional nature as designated. In all cases, specific
travel expenses must be justified in the annual departmental budget and
approved by the City Manager. Every effort shall be made to avoid the
simultaneous absence of both the department head and the assistant
department head.
B. Transportation
Use of air, train, taxi, private car or bus shall be selected on the basis of the
least total cost to the City after all expense items are tabulated. Analysis
should be made based upon travel time versus actual salary costs lost by
commuting·
Authorized travel time shall be based on that required by the most appropriate
mode of public transportation.
When the use of private automobile is approved, reimbursement shall be at the
current IRS mileage rate.
When City vehicles are used, a credit card can be obtained for all routine
n.'tNOJrrONLtMANUAI,,~3"nAVE,,X~Z. 1 o]'5 Z2/O6a, V
De
purchases of gasoline and oil. On the Travel Expense Report, the notation
should state "City Vehicle Used". If any repairs are necessary, they will be
reimbursed upon presentation of the necessary receipts. The use of City
vehicles should be included on the Travel Expense Report at the current mileage
rate allowance and then deducted as an expense paid directly by the City.
When the use of public air carrier Transportation is approvecl, travel for all ·
personnel shall be in coach class or equivalent service. Private automobile use,
to and from the airport, shall be reimbursed for all miles at the current rate as
stated above. Day parking, as well as taxis to end from the airport, will be
reimbursed orW. With raceints:
While traveling, the use of rental vehicles should be limited. Courtesy shuttle
service, buses, or limousine service should be utilized between airports and
meeting locations whenever possible. Rental vehicles will be permitted when
alternate transportation would be mere expensive or impractiaal. When rental
vehicles are used, economy vehicles should be utilized or those vehicle sizes
adequate to seat multiple City .travelers comfortably.
~ odging
Lodging shall be obtained at the most economical rate available for safe, clean
and quality accommodations. Lavish or oversized accommodations cannot be
justified. Conference headquarter hotels are encouraged, as they reduce the
costs of other modes of transportation between meetings and conference sites.
Lodging expenses and meals for spouses or other family members are not
reimbursable. Any such additional expenses must be paid for by the City
officer or employee directly, or in advance of scheduling, if the City makes
travel arrangements.
Business-related telephone charges which are added to the lodging bill may be
reimbursed. Reimbursement shall be made for two (2) telephone calls of a
personal nature for each full day of travel, not to exceed $10.00 per day.
Reimbursement for lodging shall be at the actual cost of lodging for the City
officer or employee only, including related taxes and service charges.
Other Expenses
1. Registration:
Actual cost of registration will be reimbursed if paid by the City officer
or employee. To the extent possible, pre-registration should be used and
costs paid directly by the City in advance.
2. Reimbursement Limit:
A "reimbursement limit" amount of $50 per day for each full day
involved in travel on City business for distances over 45 miles from the
City limits is authorized. A "full day" is defined as travel and training
involving more than five consecutive hours of travel and conference
time. Less than five consecutive hours is defined as a half day; the
"reimbursement limit" amount will then be computed at half rate.
Receiots are required.
"Reimbursement limit" will cover all expenses other than registration,
transportation, and lodging.
A "reimbursement limit" amount of 1t OO per day is approved for travel
to the following cities: New York; San Francisco; Chicago; and
Washington D.C.
PROCEDURE
A. Travel A-thoriz,~tion: Annual Rudget
Business or conference t'revel requests ~sldmmad to .exceed 11 00 shall be
submitted with the department's annual budget request, on the appropriate
travel and training request form. Scheduled business travel within the state
requiring more than one day, and requests for travel out of state ;equire City
Manager authorization for City employees.
B. Forms ReQuired
The Finance Officer shall establish such forms as are necessary and appropriate
to provide accurate records of travel requests and travel expense
relrnburSementin aceerdencewithCity policy and IRS reporting requirements.
All travel forms must be completed in advance and contain the necessary
signatory authorizations.
No reimbursement will be provided without receipts.
C. Fair tabor Standards Act (FLSA)
Compensation requirements with respect to time spent in attending lectures,
meeting, training programs or similar activities during work time shall be
counted as working time only if authorized in advance and in writing by the
City Manager. No such authorization shall be given unless the lecture, meeting,
program or other activity is directly related to improving the employee's ability
to perform his/her current job.
Time spent in attending lectures, meetings, training programs and similar
activities shall not be counted as working time where such attendance is
outside of the employee's regular working hours except in situations where the
employee is directed by his/her department head to attend such lecture,
meeting, training program or similar activity. In this case, employees, entitled
to overtime shall be compensated in accordance with the approved Personnel
Rules and Regulations with respect to overtime.
Travel Time
Time spent by an employee traveling between the employee's residence and
the regular work place is not work time and shall not be treated as hours
worked.
Where an employee is requested by his/her department head to travel outside
the City, time spent traveling between the employee's home and assigned
destination shall be treated as time worked only to the extent that it exceeds
the amount of time normally taken by the employee to travel between his/her
residence and regular City work place.
Definitions
City when used shall mean the City of Temecula.
Conference Travel shall be defined as travel to attend meetings or conferences
that are primarily for the educational or professional enrichment of the
participant and not to transact specific business of the City, but for which the
City will receive a secondary indirect benefit.
Business Travel shall be defined as travel at which attendance of the participant
is required to conduct specific items of City business.
Elected Official means a member of the City Council.
Commissioner means any person appointed by the City Council to an officially
established advisory board, commission, committee or task force of the City.
City Emoloyee means any person regularly employed by the City on a full-time
basis, elected officials and members of advisory commissions or boards.
Council-Appointed EmDIoyee means an employee appointed by and directly
responsible to the City Council.
10.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
11.
Utilize this form for all transactions involving training and travel requests in
conjunction with approved training.
Utilize this form for all mileage reimbursements in conjunction with City
business.
All mileage will be reimbursed at the current IRS rate.
Prepaid column is for those expenses paid in advance through the City
Purchase Requisition/Purchase Order process.
Cash allowances column is for those monies paid to traveler directly.
Receipts must accompany form if reimbursement is requested.
Forms may necessitate completion before and after travel, depending upon
nature and amount of reimbursements requested.
Authorized signatures must be secured odor to submittal to Finance. If not
secured, forms will not be processed.
Department heads may approve travel expenses and reimbursements up to
$1 O0 without City Council approval.
Items not reimbursable
Items specifically prohibited include reimbursement for I;)ersonal items. alcoholic
beverages. excel;)t as noted below. non-business related entertainment. meals
included in the registration or air travel fee. and meals in connection with half-
day or one-day training seminars. Expenses incurred by the employee's family
are also prohibited.
Submissions of Travel Expense RePOrt.
Travel Expense Reports must be submitted to the Finance Department within
ten (10) working days after the trip is concluded.
s ~s 1~
ITEM NO.
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEYS~7,F~~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM:
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
DATE:
December 14, 1993
SUBJECT:
Award of Vehicle Purchase
PREPARED BY: Luci Romero, Financial Services Administrator
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council award the purchase of the vehicle to
Schumacher Auto Sales. The purchase price is $12,582.15, excluding tax.
DISCUSSION: On October 7, 1993, the City sent out an Invitation to Bid on the
purchase of a two-door extended cab two-wheel drive pick-up. The bid packets were
mailed to 16 vendors. The deadline for receipt of the bids was November 4, 1993.
Five bids were received, as follows:
1. Fuller Ford (Chula Vista) 912,495.00
2. Schumacher Auto Sales (Temecula) 912,582.15'
3. Paradise Chevrolet (Temecula) 915,103.50'
4. Norm Reeves Chrysler Jeep Dodge (Temecula) 915,741.00'
5. Associates Commercial Corp. (Texas) 925,000.00
* Price reflects 1% sales tax discount for City of Temecula vendors.
Although the lowest bid was submitted by Fuller Ford, it does not meet the
specifications. Therefore, the lowest responsible bidder is Schmacher Auto Sales of
Temecula.
The Invitation to Bid specified a bid to convert the vehicle to propane, however, no
bids were received for this item. Therefore, City the vehicle will be converted to
propane after acquisition.
FISCAL IMPACT: The vehicle will be acquired as a capital asset through the Vehicle
Internal Service Fund. In anticipation of the purchase of this vehicle, it has been
included in the FY 1993-94 depreciation schedule payments.
ITEM
NO.
7
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
December 14, 1993
Accept Public Im~ovements in Tract No. 22627-F
PREPARED BY: Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council ACCEPT the Public Improvements in Tract No. 22627-F, AUTHORIZE
the reduction of Faithful Performance Street, and Sewer and Water System Securities,
ACCEPT the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond riders, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so
notify the Developer and Surety.
BACKGROUND:
On March 26, 1991, the City Council approved Final Tract Map No. 22627-F. Agreements
and Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds were filed by:
Van Daele Development Corporation
2900 Adams Street, Ste. C-25
Riverside, CA 92504
for the installation of street improvements, sewer and water systems, and subdivision
monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued in the
following amounts by:
Golden Eagle Insurance Company
1. BondNo. SUR1271 16 in the amount of 6539,500.00 to cover street improvements.
e
Bond No. SUR 12 71 17 in the amount of $78,000.00 to cover water system
improvements.
Bond No. SUR 12 71 18 in the amount of $70,500.00 to cover sewer system
improvements.
1 ~pwO 1 ~gdrpt%93%l 210%22627
4. Bond No. SUR 12 71 19 in the amount of $40,000.00 to cover subdivision
monumentation.
B
Bonds No. SUR 12 71 16, SUR 12 71 17, and SUR 12 71 18 in the amounts of
$269,750.00, $39,000.00, and $35,250.00 respectivelyto cover labor end materials.
The City Council authorized a fifty-percent (50 %) reduction in Faithful Performance Bond
amounts on November 9, 1993, the maximum partial reduction permitted under the terms of
the subdivision agreement. There were several issues to be worked out with the developer
that precluded Staff recommending acceptance of the public improvements by the City
Council at that time. These issues have now been resolved. The attached letter of agreement
confirms the developer's accepting responsibility to maintain undersidewalk drains (core-bores)
placed by residents without benefit of construction/encroachment permit or inspection. This
one-year maintenance period is consistent with the requisite warranty period for all standard
public improvements.
The following items have been completed by the developer in accordance with the approved
plans:
Required street, sewer, and water improvements within Tract No 22627-F.
Staff has inspected and verified the public improvements and the Public Works Department
recommends acceptance of the work, reduction in bond amounts to the ten-percent warranty
level, and initiation of the warranty period. The subdivider is submitting riders to the Faithful
Performance Bonds for warranty purposes in the following amounts:
Streets:
Water System:
Sewer System:
Total =
$53,950.00
$ 7,800.00
$ 7,050.00
$68,800.00
The Monumentation security willremainin place untilthe Survey Monumentationiscompleted
and approved.
The Labor and Material Bonds will remain in place until the statutory period for filing liens for
labor and material claims has run, Staff recommends release, and the City Council authorizes
release of these bonds as well.
The affected streets include Silver Ridge Court, and a portion of Sierra Madre Drive and Cross
Creek Court.
Attachments:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Faithful Performance Warranty Bond Riders.
3. Letter of Agreement-Maintainenance of Core-bores.
-2- pw01%agdrpt~q3~l 109~22627
I
I
.,
T,M, 2/430-1
I~B 192/1-8
S~'E ,IN. MS FOIl' .4.,Q NO. 161 Y~O. 68-07.44
.. N/COLAS RO~D " ~ '~
\ /
PROJECT
" -' r ~'~TfiA C T NO. 2262'7
SEC. 49, T7S, R2~', S. kB.M.
NO ~.A~,~
~~~G, OLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE COMPANY
O. Box. 15667, San Diego, California 921151' (619) 287-6770
AMOUNT OF COVERAGE/RIDER
To be attached to and form part of Bond No. SUR 127116 in the amount ot$ 269,750.00
issued by Golden Eagle Insurence Ccm,ut-arllfi behalf ~f V~n I'~l~a R~nt"hn 1;)~. T,'hrt.
In favor of City of T~mecul~
It Is understood and agreed that the bond described above Is hereby modified so as
t,=, state ~';%.=~o..t is ,-,,-.--,=.~.~,~ from S ,.'=,, ?.n to $ ,,, ,~*,' ,',,,...ch ch.,,ge
In the amount to have effect as of and from Now,tuber 29. 1993
Said Principal and said Surety snail be liable under said bond for loss sustained by
the Obllgee during the period such change shall continue in effect, only to the extent by
which the bond amount exceeds loss, if any, covered by said bond which snail have been
sustained by the Obllgee prior to such ..'~vPrnh~,- ?..q, lqqt
Signed, Sealed, and Dated this 23rd
day of November , 1993
By:
V~,n r",a~al p l:~nc'hn 1 ?F; , T.t-rt _
r Patrick J. Van Daele
Exec. Vice President
(Seal)
By: \
K. R. Viodes, Attorney In Pact
For. Golden Eagle Insurance Company
SureW
GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE COMPANY
O. Box 15667, San Diego, California 92115 (619) 287-6770
AMOUNT OF COVERAGE/RIDER
To be attached to and form part of Bond No. SUB 127118
issued by Golden S~cJ'le Lnsu_rance on behalf of
in the amount of $ t~. ?qn_ nn
Van Dael e P~nr.hn 1
in favor of City of Tenecala
It Is understood and agreed that the IDond described above Is hereby modified so as
Performance
to state the/~bond amount Is dec:eased from $35. ?~n. nn to $ 7. o~o. fin , such change '
In the amount to have effect as of and from N~vember 29. ] 9q'~'
Said Principal and said Surety snail be liable under said bond for loss sustained by
the Obliges during the period such change shall continue in effect, only to the extent by
which the bond amount exceeds loss, if any, covered by said bond which shall have been
sustained by the Obllgee prior to such i',,~vemh:,-,- 29, -~c~c~.~
Signed, Sealed, and Dated this 23rd day ot ,',,hv,=..nF,=,~- , 199:3-
By:
Van Daele Rancho 126, L~-a.
(Principal) Patrick J. Van Daele
Exec. Vice President
(Seal)
K. R. Viodes, Attorney in Fact
FoP. Golden Eagle Insurance Combany
SureW
A~cepted by:
GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE COMPANY
O. Box 15667, San Diego, California 92115 (619) 287-6770
AMOUNT OF COVERAGE/RIDER
To be attached to and form part of Bond No. ~m ] 77117
Issued by Golden Eagle Insurance on behalf of
C_.{mpany
in the amount of $ '~9. nnn nn '-
Van Daele P, ancho 176.
In favor of
c~ty of Temecu~
It Is understood and agreed that the bond described a~ova is hereby modlfled so as
Performance
to state the^boncl amount Is decreased from $ 39.nno. nn to $ '~,~nn nn , such change
In the amount to have effect as of and from
Said Principal and said Surety shall De liable under said bond for loss sustained by
the Obliges during the period such change shall continue in effect, only to the extent by
which the bond amount exceeds loss, if any, covered by said bond which shall have been
sustained by the Obliges prior to such November 29, 1993
SIgned, Sealed, and Dated this
23rd
day of November . 1993
By:
Van Daele Rancho 126, Ltd.
.q-o,
(Principal) Patrick J. Van Daele
Exec. Vice President
By: \
K. R. Viodes, Attorney In Fact
For. Golden Eagle Insurance Company
'Sure~
· "lilt '.'.'.'-'.'-'.'.'.'. BY:
%'.,5'=
,,
}~: ]i].'ililllll:]ll]]l ~ ~ Title
gBLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE COMPANY
ox 15667, San Diego, California 92115 (619) 287-6770
AMOUNT OF COVERAGE/RIDER
To be attached to and form part of Bond No, .gin 1 ~'71 q '7
Issued by Golden T~gle Insurance on behalf of
in the amount of $ ~q, nnn nn
Van Daele P, ancho '12.6. T,fd.
In favor of
City of Tenecula
It Is understood and agreed that the bond described above is hereby modified so aa
Pe. zformance
to state rheAbond mount is clec~ed from $ 39.0tlo.nn to $ '7,rmn On -, such change
In the amount to have e/fect as of and from Nntn=mh~v- ~cm qcmg~J
Said Principal and said Surety shall be liable under said bond for loss sustained by
the Obllgee during the period such change shall continue in effect. only to the extent by
which the bond amount exceeds loss, if any, covered by said bond which shall have been
sustained by the Obligee prior to such ~7,/ember 29, 1993
SIgned, Sealed, and Dated this 23rd
day of November . 1993
(Seal)
By:
Van Daele Rancho 126, Ltd.
(Principal) Patrick J. Van Daele
Exec. Vice President
K. 'R'. Viodes, Attorney in Fact
For: Golden Eagle Insurance Company
Surety
Accepted bz: cz~ cF ~a,~mL-x.r~
BY:
Name ~nd Title
GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE COMPANY
O. Box 15667, San Diego, California 92115 .(619) 287-6770P
AMOUNT OF COVERAGE/RIDER
To be attached to and form part of Bond No. ~m 1 ~7~ q 7
Issued by Golden Eagle Insurance on behalf of
Ccmloany
in the amount of $ '~q nnn nn
Van Daele Rancho
in favor of
c~ty of Temecula
It Is understood and agreed that the bond described above Is hereby modified so as
Performance
to state rheAbond mount is decreased from $ 39,000. tsr] to $ 7,finn On . such change
In the amount to have effect as of and from ~hv,~.h,-,- ~Q ~9,Q3
Said Principal and said Surety shall be liable under said bond for loss sustained by
t~e Obligee during the period such change shall continue in effect. only to the extent by
which the bond amount exceeds loss. if any. covered by said bond which shall have been
sustained by the Obllgee prior to such November 29, 1993
Signed. Sealed, and Dated this 23rd day of November . 1993
Certificate of Acknowledgemerit
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CountY of ORANGE
Victoria M.' Campbell, Notary public
bdo~ me,
0n November 23, 19'93
personally appeared K. -~. riodes
.~r,~ff,6~ri.~B,e~l~t. lf~i~/re~E) to be me pe~n~) wh~ n~ ~ s~ribed W ~e
~e ~e in~her~ ~om~ ~aci~), ~d ~at by
pe~onaily known ~o me ~ ~shs~ ex~u~ '
OFFICIAL SEAL
'.~-'ESS my h~d ~d offici~ ~. : ~~ VICTORIA M. CAMPBELL
- ~ ~ NC~ARY P;JSLIC. CALiFGRi~jA
O ?R;r~CIPAL OFF C~ N
=~i~:-> ORAN~E COUHTY
- i~ '.~y CG;.U,;IS$~0;I EXPIRES NOV. 25, IS
GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE L'O4PAMY
EXECUTIVE OFFICES
San Diego, California
POKER OF ATTORNEY
That the GoLde~ Eagle Insurance Company, a Corporation duly organized and
I¢NO~/ALL HEN BY THESE PRESENTS,
existing under the Laws of the State of California, having its principal office in the City of San Diego,
California does herel~y nominate, constitute and appoint:
..... >ICR. VIa)ES< .....
its true and Lawful agent and attorney-in-fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver for and on its behalf as
surety, bonds, consents of surety, and undertakings in suretyship for ONE HILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAIilD DOLLARS
(Sl ,SO0,O00.O0).
This power of attorney is granted and is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the
rot towing Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the Golden Eagle Insurance Company at a meeting duly
called and held on April 10, 198/. which said Resolution has not been amended or rescinded and of which the
following is a true, futt and complete
"RESOLVED: That the President or Secretary may from time to time appoint Attorneys-in-Fact to represent
and act for and on behalf of the Company, and either the President or Secretary, the Board of Directors
or Executive Co~tittee may at any time remove such Attorneys-{n-Fact and revoke the Power of Attorney
given him or her; and be it further
"RESOLVED: That the Attorneys-In-Fact may be given full power to execute for and in the name
of and on behalf of the Company any and all bonds and undertakings as the business of the
Company may require, and any such bonds or undertakings executed by any such Attorney-In-Fact
shall be binding u~on the Company as if signed by the President and sealed and attested by the
Secretary."
IN 'JITNESS ~/HEREOF, the said Golden Eagle Insurance Company has caused these presents to be executed by its
officer, with its corporate seal affixed.
This 1st day of January,
GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE COMPANY
~./ILLIAH 8. RIPPEE, PRE~[DENff
State of California )
County of San. Diec]O as.
on this 1st day of January, lqq:~, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State,
personally al~eared ~/ittiam B. Rippea, personally known to me, (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence) to be the person(s) whose names is/are subscribed to the within instrument and aci~no~Ledged to me that
he/she/they executed the same in his /her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrtJltent the..~.{~O,.(~,l.,,,.~,r,.~Tth,.f,,f. rt,1;,i,t.~,Y.~,?~,~l~.a,~f of .hich the person(s) acted, executed
! the undersigned, Larry G. Iqabee, Secretary of the Golden Eagle Insurance Company, do hereby certify that the
original PO~ER OF ATTORNEY, of which the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy, is in full force and
effect, and has not been revoked.
[N ~JITNESS 1JHEREOF, i er ' name as Secretary, and affixed the ¢orp. gf~t//~';S'eal of the
Corporation, this ~' , 1~ 93 .
LARRY G. HABEE, Secretary
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
E OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
SS.
On Nov. 24. 1993 before me, Kristi L. Blanchard ,
personally appeared Patrick J. Van Daele ,
Executive Vice President , personally known to me (or proved
~o me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s)
whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrumen~ and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in
his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon
behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
ignature
(Seal)
GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE COMPANY
O. Box 15667, San Diego, California 92115 (619) 287-6770
AMOUNT OF COVERAGE/RIDER
To be attached to and form part of Bond No.S[~ 3,271
issued by Colde~ ~agle Zz'~su.=a.,,ce on behalf of
in the amount of $
Van Dee1 e ~qnnhn
In favor of City o£ Temecula
It IS understood and agreed that the bond described above is hereby modified so as
Performance
to state theAbond amount 1~ dec:eased from $35.750. nn to $ 7,050. nn , such change
In the amount to have effect as of and from Novera3e~ 29.1
Said Principal and said Surety shall be lial~le under said bond for loss sustained by
t~e Obllgee during the period such change shall continue in effect, only to the extent by
which the bond amount exceeds loss, if any, covered by said I~ond which shall have been
sustained by the Obllgee prior to such Never 79, qqq'~
Signed, Sealed, and Dated this
23rd day Of
(Seal)
By:
Van Daele Rancho 126. T.~-a.
(Principal) Patrick J, Van Daele
Exec. Vice President
K. R. Vi<~s,' Aitornoy In Fact
For:. Golden Eagle Insurance Company
Surely
Accepted by:
City of Tenecula
Name & Title
VOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE COMPAN z"
O. Box 15667, San Diego, California 92115 (619) 287-6770P
AMOUNT OF COVERAGE/RIDER
To be attached to and form part of Bond No.s'J'~ 127] ] 8
Issued by Golden :Eag.]:e ~ce on behalf ol
Cc:mpany
in the amount of $ 3s. ?sn. nn
Van ]::)~el e :P. qnc'hn
In favor of City of Temecula
It Is understood and agreed that the bond described above is hereby modified so as
PerfozTnance
to state theAbond mount Is decreased from $35. ~0. nn to $ 7.0~0. nn , such change
In the amount to have effect as of and from November 29. q qq~
Said Principal and said Surety shall De liable under said bond for loss sustained by
the Obligee during the period such change shall continue in effect, only to the extent by
which the bond amount exceeds loss, if any, covered by said bond which shall have been
sustained by the Obligee prior to such Z'~:Nemhr,r 29, ]qq~
SIgned, Sealed, and Dated this 23rd day of
Certificate of Acknowledgement
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of ORANGE
0n November 23, 1993
personajlyappe~red K. R. Viodes
before me,
Van Daele Rancho _126. Ltd.
Victoria M. Campbell, Notary Public
personally known m me (~. i~l~'3~llltl~ to be the person(~ whose name(~ is/il~ subscribed m the
within insu'umem and acknowledged to me ~ha~ MVshettl~ execur~l the same in lflll/her/lt~lf authorized capacity(~), and tha~ by
· "":.'~'her/,~lt~ si~namre{~on the instTument the person{q, or the entity upon behalf of which the person(~ acrid. executed the instTument.
'.ViT:{ESS my hand and official seal.
(Seal)
OFFICIAL SEAL
VICTORIA M. CA.MPBELL
NOTARY RtJBLIC - CALIFORNIA:
PRINC!PAL OFFICE IN
ORANGE CGU;'~TY
Q)M:,IIS~'0:~ EXPIRES N0:. 25. ~94
GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE COI4PAIr(
EXECUTIVE OFFICES
San Diego, Ca[ifornia
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That the Golden Eagle Insurance Company, a Corporation duty organized and
existing under the Laws of the State of California, having its principal office in the City of San Diego,
California does hereby nominate, constitute and appoint:
..... >[.R. VICOES< .....
its true and lawful agent and attorney-in-fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver for and on its behalf as
surety, bends, consents of surety, and undertakings in suretyship for ONE HILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS
($1,500,000.00).
This po,er of attorney is granted and is signed and sealed by Facsimile under and by the authority of the
fotLo, ing Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the Golden Eagle Insurance Company at a meeting duly
called and held on April 10, 198/, which said Resolution has not been amended or rescinded and of which the
following is a true, full and complete copy.
"RESOLVED: That the President or Secretary may from time to time appoint Attorneys-ln-Fact to represent
and act for and on behalf of the Company, end either the President or Secretary, the Board of Directors
or Executive Con~nittee may at any time remove such Attorneys-ln-Fact and revoke the Power of Attorney
given him or her; and be it further
"RESOLVED: That the Attorneys-In-Fact may be given futt pover to execute for and in the name
of and on behalf of the Company any and all bonds and undertakings as the business of the
Company may require, and any such bends or undertakings executed by any such Attorney-In-Fact
snell be binding upon the Cong}any as if signed by the President and seated and attested by the
Secretary."
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Golden Eagle Insurance Company has caused these presents to be executed by its
officer, with its corporate seat affixed.
This 1st day of January, 1993,
GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE COMPANY
WILLIAH B. RIPPLE, f/
State of California )
County of Sa~ Diego ss.
on this 1st day of January, 1993, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State,
personally appeared William B. Rippea, personally known to me, (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence) to be the person(s) whose names is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that
he/she/they executed the same in his /her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument thl..~,C~?.q{.~..~,~,~h,~.~..~t,i,t.X,~,?.,~be~,.,aJ~ of .hich the person(s) actS, executed
~ ..~ .... '~ ;, ,~7~3 = 'YNN TT RA H NA / NOTARY PUB IC
n "' -'--. ~- / ' "· ' E CDO
L
I the u~ersigned, Larry G. Ha~e, Secretary of the Golden Eagle !~urance C~any, do hereby certify that the
original POUER OF ATTORNEY, of which the foregoing is a fu{t, true ~ correct co~, is in fukt force a~
effect, a~ has not been revoked,
ZN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed ~ na~ as Secretary, and affixed /
t · ~ p~a ' at of
Corporation, this ~ day of ~~r · , 19 Q~ .
By:
LARRY G. HABEE, Secretary
LEDGEMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
SS.
On Nov. 24, 1993 before me, Kristi L. Blanchard ,
personally appeared Patrick J. Van Daele ,
Executive Vice President , personally known to me (or proved
to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s)
whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in
his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon
behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
(Seal)
OLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE COMPANY
O. Box 15667, San Diego, Ca ifornia 92115 (619) 287-6770
AMOUNT OF COVERAGE/RIDER
To be attached to and form part of Bond No, ~ 127116 in the amount of $ 2.69,750. O0
Issued by Golden ~agle IP, s.~ance C~ behalf of v~n n,~l~. T~n<-~.hn 1~, T.~-a.
· In favor of city of TRTEO,I~
It is understood and agreed that the bond described above Is hereby modified so as
In the amount to have effect as of and from Now,tuber :~9. 1993
Said Principal and said Surety shall be liable under said bond for loss sustained by
the Obligee during the period such change shall continue in effect, only to the extent by
which the bond amount exceeds loss, if any, covered by said bond which shall have been
sustained by the Obligee prior to such ~,,hv~r 29,
Signed, Sealed, and Dated this 23rd day of Nov~ , 1993
Certificate of Acknowledgemerit
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Count~ of ORANGE
On ~sve'n~er 23, 1993
personally appeared K. R. riodes
before me,
Victoria M. Campbell, NotarT Public
,se~onaily known co me (~ ...... ~ilf&~ to be the person01:) whose name(~j is/tl subscribed to me
· .viEbin ins[rumen~ and acknowledged to me tha~ ~Jshe/t~ ~xecut~d the same bq ~M/her/IMq~ authorzeal capacity~q~), and tha~ by
..~;hez'/ff~l~i~ signamre(.~on the instrument the person(~, or the entity upon behalf of which the person(9) acted. executed the LnswumenL
;VIT~_~NESS my hand and official seal.
(Seal)
. VICTORIA M. CAMPBELL ~,
w ~ OFFICIAL SEAL j,
w I NCTA~,Y PUBLIC- CALIFORNIAi ~
~ F :i';SIPAL C/~FICE IN
Y R P N UP T
:': . :5. '1
/
GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE COMPANY
O. Box 15667, San Diego, California 92115 (619) 287-6770P
AMOUNT OF COVERAGE/RIDER
To be attached to and form part of Bond No. SUR ].271.1.6 in the amount of $ 269,750.00
Issued by Golden Eagle :Tmsurance'~ behalf of v;=,n l~plp n~nc.hn l~, T.~-r3.
· In favor of City of TRnecnn~
It is understood and agreed that the bond described above Is hereby modified so as
to state &~A~%nz'~oun, Is tg,=.c~-~.~,~q from $ ~,q, ?~n to $ ~'~, q~n' nn. such chanO,
In the amount to have effect as of and from ~'~w=mher 79.1993
Said Principal and said Surety shall be liable under said bond for loss sustained by
the Obliges during the period such change shall continue in effect, only to the extent by
which the bond amount exceeds Joss, if any. covered by said bond which shall have been
sustained by the Obliges prior to such Nnvernh~,-
Signed, Sealed, and Dated this 23rd
day of Novembe~ . 1993
(Seal)
By:
V~n Pmelp Ran~hn 1~6,
(Print'pal) Patrick J. Van Daele
Exec. Vice President
K. R. Viedes, Attorney tn Fact
For:. Golden Eagle Insurance Company
Surety
Accepted by: CITY OF ~
BY:
Name ar~ Title
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
SS.
On Nov. 24, 1993 before -me, Kristi L. Blanchard ,
personally appeared Patrick J. Van Daele, Exec. Vice President ,
, personally known to me (or proved
'to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s)
whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in
his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon
behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand ahd official seal.
Signature
(Seal)
GOLDEN EAGLE |MSURAMCE CONPAMY
EXECUTTV15 OFFICES
San Diego. CaLifornle
PO~ OF ATTORNEY
[MOU ALL MEN BY THESE PRESEHTS, That the Golden Eagle insurance Company. a Corporation duly organized and
existing under the Laws of the State of California, having its principal office in the City of San Diego,
California does hereby nominate. constitute and appoint:
..... >[.R. VIOOES< .....
its true and lawful agent and attorney-in-fact. to make, execute. sea[ and deliver for and on its behalf as
surety, bonds. consents of surety, and undertakings in suretyship for OME MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS
CSl,SO0.O00.O0)-
This power of attorney is granted and is signed and sealed by facsimile under end by the authority of the
following Resolution adopted by the Board of Oirectors of the Golden Eagle Insurance Company at a meeting duly
carted and held on April 10. 198z. which said Resolution has not been amended or rescinded and of which the
following is a true, full and complete cop./.
-RESOLVED: That the president or SecretarymaY from tim to time appoint Attorneys-In-Fact to represent
and act for and on behalf of the Company, and either the President or Secretary. the Board of Directors
or Executive Cowmittee may at any time remove such Attorneys-in-Fact and revoke the Power of Attorney
given him or her; and be it further
,,RESOLVED: That the Attorneys-in-Fact may be given full power to execute for and in the name
of and on behalf of the Company any and art bonds and undertakings as the business of the
Company maY require, and any such bonds or undertakings executed by any such Attorney-In-Fact
shall be binding upon the Company as if signed by the president and sealed and attested by the
Secretary-"
IN ~iTNESS WHEREOF, the said Golden Eagle Insurance Company has caused these presents to be executed by its
officer, with its corporate seal affixed. This 1st day of January,
GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE COIqPANT
~JtLLIAM 8. R[PPEE. PRESIDEnt/
State of California )
County of Sct.P. DiL:K;jQ ss.
On this 1st day of January, 1995, before me, the undersigned, a Notary public in and for said County and State,
personally appeared William a. Rippea, personally known to me, (or proved to rite on the basis of satisfactory
evidence) to be the person(s) whose names is/are subscribed'to the within instrt~nent and acknowledged tome that
he/she/they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signatureCs) on the instrument th .~E~?~!~.;,~.~T~.~.ry~X~.P,?~b~,-~~f of ~hich the person(s) acted, executed
the instrument.
Witness my hand and official sea~ ~.,'
% the undersigned, Larry G. ~abee, Secretary of the Golden Eagle insurance Company, do hereby certify that the
original POWER OF ATTORNEY, of which the foregoing is a fu~l, true and correct copy, is in full force and
effect, and has not been revoked.
h e ereunto subscribed mY name as Secretary, and affixed ~r 'el of the
I. u~T.ESS U.EREOF. I ~ day of
Corporation, this .. '
LARRY G. MABEE, Secretary
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
November 16, 1993
Mr. Tim D. Serlet
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Sent bv Fax
RE: Agreement to Include Repairs to Curb and Gutter and
Sidewalk at Undersidewalk Drains/Curb Core Locations in
Warranty Period for Tract 22627
Dear Hr. Serlet:
As discussed, it is agreed by both Van Daele Development
Corporation (VDDC) and the City of Temecula (City) that VDDC's
bonds relative to street improvements, water, sewer, and
subdivision monumentation are all in a position for exoneration
to 10% for Tract 22627. It is further agreed that there are
approximately 57 lots located in Tract 22627 which have
undersidewalk drains/curb cores which presently encroach into the
City 1Q' public right-of-way.
In consideration of the above, VDDC wishes to allow this letter
to serve as an agreement between itself and the City for the
exoneration to 1Q% of its existing faithful performance
securities, specifically Bond No. SUR 127116 Street Improvements;
Bond No. SUR 127117 Water; Bond No. SUR 127118 Sewer; Bond No.
SUR 127119 Subdivision Monumentation, all for Tract 22627. The
terms of said agreement are as follows:
In addition to its obligation for complete exoneration
of the above said bonds, VDDC agrees to repair any
failed curb or sidewalk located on Tract 22627 during
the one-year warranty period at the specific location
of an undersidewalk drain/curb core.
2900 Adams Street · Suite C-25
Riverside. Califomia 92504
Phone: (909) 354-2121
FAX: (909) 354-2996
Mr. Tim D. Serlet
November 16, 1993
Page Two
AGREED AND ACCEPTED:
TIM D.
Director of Public Works/
City Engineer
City of Temecula
Van Daele Development
Corporation
APPPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY
SCOTT F. FIELD
City Attorney
City of Temecula
SSK:kb
ITEM
NO.
8
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City CoUncil/City Manager
im D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
T
December 14, 1993
Contract Change Orders No. 30 through No. 35 for Ynez Road
Widening Project, PW92-05, CFD 88-12
PREPARED BY:/~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve Contract Change Order No. 30 through No. 35 for Ynez Road
Widening Project, PW92-05 for labor and equipment for various items of work, in the amount
of $12,080.95.
BACKGROUND:
During the construction of the Ynez Road Widening Project the following items of work have
resulted in a change to the contract:
CHANGE ORDER NO. 30
Unsuitable soils were encountered in the sub-base on the new road section just north of
Solana Way. This area was found to be 150' long and 12' wide. The Soils Engineer for the
project reviewed and recommended overexcavating the saturated material and replace it with
additional class II base. This will provide a stable sub-base for the new road section.
SUBTOTAL: $2,404.60
CHANGE ORDER NO. 31
Unsuitable soils were also encountered in the sub-base on the new road section just south of
Solana Way. This area was reviewed by the Soils Engineer and a recommendation was made
to overexcavate the saturated material and replace it with additional class II base. This will
provide a stable sub base for the new road section.
SUBTOTAL: $807.27
pw04%egdq~t%93~,121 4~ow92-05 120693
CHANG; ORDI:R NO. 32
Install 5" electrical conduit across Ynez Road at Solana Way for future undergrounding of
existing SCE power poles on the south side of Solans Way.
SUBTOTAL (Estimate): $2,344.90
CHANGE ORDER NO. 33
While the contractor was replacing the brick pavers on the east side of Ynez Road at Motor
Car Parkway, a 6" wide and 6" deep concrete band was constructed around the brick pavers
to provide for easier maintenance of the asphalt pavement.
SUBTOTAL: $2,338.07
CHANGE ORDER NO. 34 (Reimbursed by Rancho California Water District)
When Rancho California Water District installed their facilities on Ynez Road their contractor
installed the field test wires for the main water line too close to the existing street surface.
During the pavement grinding phase the field test wires were destroyed. Therefore, the
contractor reinstailed new field test wires just north of Rancho California Road. The cost to
install the test wires will be reimbursed by R.C.W.D.
SUBTOTAL: $2,731.05
CHANGE ORDER NO. 35
During the placement of the Line "D" storm drain pipe an additional 32 feet of 48" RCP pipe
was required. This additional length of pipe allowed for the storm drain outlet to extend past
the new slope embankment. This is a supplemental cost to contract change order no. 7.
SUBTOTAL: $1,455.06
TOTAL: $12,357.27
FISCAL IMPACT:
On January 26, 1993, the City Council awarded a contract for the construction of Ynez Road
Widening from Rancho California Road to Palm Plaza, to Vance Corporation for
$2,612,811.29. Contract Change Order No.'s 01 through 29 were approved for a total
amount of $436,533.09. Contract Change Order No.'s 30 through No. 35 are in the amount
of $12,080.95 of which $2,731.05 will be reimbursed by R.C.W.D. Therefore, an additional
$12,080.95 must be appropriated for the Ynez Road Widening Project from CFD 88-12.
There are adequate funds available in the CFD 88-12 construction account.
Attachments:
Contract Amendments
pw04~egdrpt~93\1214~pw92-O5 120693
· " City of Temecula
1989~~ 43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590 1909) 694-1989 · FAX (909) 694-1999
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 030
CONTRACT NO. PW92-05
PROJECT: Ynez Road Widenine - CFD 88-12 SHEET. I of I
TO CONTRACTOR: Vance Corporation
NOTE: This chanQe order is not effective until aDDroved by the EnQineer
THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR:
An INCREASE in the following item:
Excessive water was encountered in the sub-base on the new road section just north of
Solana Way. This area was found to be 150' long and 12' wide. The Soils Engineer for the
project reviewed and recommended to overexcavate the unsuitable material and replace it
with additional class II base.
TOTAL (Estimate): $2,404.60
Original Contract Amount: ...................................
Adjusted Contract Amount: ...................................
Change Order No. 030 ....................................... $
Total Contract Amount: .....................................
2,612,811.29
3,049,344.38
2,404.60
3,051,748.98
Adjustment of Working Days: .................................
Approved: Principal Engineer By: Date:
We the undersigned contractor have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree. If this proposal
is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, end perform
all services necessary for the work above epecified, and will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above.
2ted Accepted: ~//~~/A ~ Contractor: Z)~'/~/~;
:~ (company's name)
Title: ,~::: ,--f~='r--v~~A'/~
: ' ~tur
Name
(print)
If the contractor does not sign acceptance to this order, his attention is directed to the requirements of the specifications as
to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written protest within the time therein specified.
pwO4%cip%projects\pw92-OS\cco\cco30.oco 120693
VanCe Corporation
General Engineering Contractor
License No, 414567--A
2271 N. Locust Ave., Rialto, CA 92376 · (714) 355-4333 * Fax No. (714) 355-4339
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL INFORMATION SHEET:
CITY/ST~E.-
WE ARE TRANSMITTING A TOTAL OF ,~ PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER PAGE.
DATE:
TIME:
IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES OR FIND THEY ARE
ILLEGIBLE PLEASE
CALL US AT (714) 355-4333 AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AND ASK FOR:
FROM
TO
Vance Corporation
General Engineering Contractor
2271 N. Locust Ave., Rialto, CA 92376
Speed Memo/
Reply
DATE:
A'I'I'ENTION:
[] URGENT
[] SOON AS
POSSIBLE
[] NO REPLY
NEEDED
/
) z ' ~/. c> ' /F~ k-~-~,-~ ~ ,-,-/.
SIGNED
FROM
TO
VanCe Corporation
General Engineering Contractor
2271 N. Locust Ave., Rialto, CA 92376
Speed Memo/
Reply
DATE://'7'~ '~..~
A'I'rENTION:/~~'
[] URGENT
[] SOC~A.S
PC' ,LE
[] NO REPLY
NEEDED
J Z/r,/-. ~¢
L-,4-R 7 :,'x 7- E
7'72- ""~24-c~ ,6.-.~-~
SIGN~D~~//
· " City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590 19091 694-1989o FAX (9o91 694-1999
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 031
CONTRACT NO. PW92-05
PROJECT:
Ynez Road Widenine - CFD 88-12
SHEET 1__ of 1__
TO CONTRACTOR: Vance Corporation
NOTE:
This chanoe order is not effective until aDoroved by the Enaineer
THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR:
An INCREASE in the following item:
Excessive water was encountered in the sub-base on the new road section just south of
Solana Way. This area was reviewed by the Soils Engineer and a recommendation was made
to overexcavate the unsuitable material and replace it with additional class II base. This will
provide a stable sub base for the new road section.
TOTAL (Estimate): $807.27
Original Contract Amount: ...................................
Adjusted Contract Amount: ...................................
Change Order No. 031 .......................................
Total Contract Amount: .....................................
2,612,811.29
3,051,748.98
807.27
3,052,556.25
Adjustment of Working Days: .................................
0
Dated Accepted: //~////~/,,~' Contractor:
By: .
Name: )/r ~C:)
(print)
(company's name)
Title: ,, (' ,~C"~--~/~,/'~~''''
If the contractor dou not sign acceptance to this order, his attention is directed to the requirements of the specifications as
to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written protest within the time therein specified,
pwO4\cip~projects\pw92-05\cco\cco31,cco 120693
FROM
TO
Vance Corporation
General Engineering Contractor
2271 N. Locust Ave., Rialto, CA 92376
Speed Memo/
Reply
DATE:
ATTENTION:
[] URGENT
[] soo~ AS
NEEDED
o?,-7~ - P' t~ e,r~ D ~ / .,~z-- ~ ~ r.L/4-<, ~
262,{-~, 'J
--f ~r~7-zl
SIGNED u~ ~ /,,
PROJECT: Ynez Road Widenins - CFD 88-12 SHEET I of __1
TO CONTRACTOR: Vance Corporation
NOTE:
This chanqe order is not effective until aDoroved by the Engineer
THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR:
An INCREASE in the following item:
Ae
Install 5" electrical conduit across Ynez Road at Solana Way for future undergrounding of
existing SCE power poles on the south side of Solana Way.
TOTAL: 92,344.90
Original Contract Amount: ...................................
Adjusted Contract Amount: ...................................
Change Order No. 032 ....................................... $
Total Contract Amount: .....................................
$ 2,612,811.29
$ 3,052,556.25
2,344.90
$ 3,054,901.15
Adjustment of Working Days: .................................
Approved: Principal Engineer By: Date:
We the undersigned contractor have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree. If this proposal
is approved, that we will provide 811 equipment, furnish all materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform
all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above.
Dated Accepted:
By: ~ _~/~ Title:
/ (print)
Name:
Contractor:
If the contractor does not sign acceptance to this order, his atlention is directed to the requirements of the specifications as
to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written protest within the time therein specified.
pwO4~,cip~projects%pw92-OS%cco~cco32.cco 120193
~°~' Vance Corporation
General Engineering Contractor
2271 N. Locust Ave.. Rialto, CA 92376
TO
Speed Memo/
Reply
DATE:.////
ATTENTION:
[] URGENT
= ~,~'~E
[] NO REPLY
NEEDED
I- Z4-,~,
, <,e'rz~ - 2/Tft.~ re_. It. ~
Pu~d /? -- g 7, --d~r
/,4~ - ~D,° /
/2rrz
Lekos Electric.:
,.. ,..;.~.~ · .. :.-. :-"~=,~-'-;~.., , ~-~ ;i.' .. ~.,
~.;-- . ',' . .
........ ~....?
The followin~ is a breakdown of time-and material .for installing
140' of-5"..--PVC SCN."80 for ~fuCure-'use.,on .~he ynez,Road Widening~
. Uti!iCy Tech 1 ;; 8, Q. hrs., ~ .$21,58 per hr'. $172.64
.. .,5 hrs,--.e $30,4!'. per hr. $ 15.21
---";= U~i!i~v Tec'h 2'~"':~L8,0-'hrs, · e. $14~05" per '-hr, $112.40
" .5 hrs,$ $19,53 per hr. $ 9.77
- 8 0 hrs.~.::e c~o 45 per h~ $259.60
Operator:
.5 hrs. ~ $43.93 per
~Z2 40
SUBTOTAL L~BOR $ 7 a 3.99
$1~0.86
;.' "~: 20% Mark~up. ...-, · .: ' : . ..- .--
~Of~, ~OR COS~ ', ....: . .. : ..... .: ,.. .....,...
.. .'......~ ~ ~,~... ;. ..... -
F.~TEKZALS: . -; - · -
,~ ~,'2 5" .Sch'.80 90 degree EZbows $ITS.lS ..-
...~,.-7.75%..Sales TaX ." ..$..58.99
..... . .' , . -. - .~ . ----~------T.. ;~}~ ;;,
, . - . ' ' ·,, - ~i '~ .... , ', ,.- ~ .-'~,: ' ~t,~."~ 7~' "..Z~ · ~ ', .... . ' '
.,. - , .: ,',,-;. ": ,., "'.".';~Z-2,-'.- ..,L.'~' ~;' _ , '-. :-.~;~.-:.',.-,: ,~::,'?~;',
- . ~' :,~ ' "' ~. ".' ~ ' · '~ . ,:: · ",' - .,': "~ ~, .'~u-' '-. "- ; '~'~' ' ~ i '.~-;?.":;',~;3 ~ "'.',.;;,~'~,~
- . _ .,. -.. . . · · .... . - ~. , .
- :.'' '
, - . ', ~;~ ~ ,. - .,.
~ -~ ...~ -,-, ~ , --., ,_. - . ,- .
.... ;~ "' ' I~r'F.~'~'~ ~' ;~ ~i..~ .........~ .:~ .......
. i -:: ...... '- ' ............ .,..
November22, 1993 """-
VANCE CORPORATION
2271North.'..Locus% Ave,
Rialto# CA' 92376u-,"-"'~
Attn:-.Mike if=.:
Re: Ynez Road W~dening
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590 1909) 694-1989 ° FAX 1909) ~ ~99
CONTRAOT OHANGE ORDER NO. 033
GONTRAOT NO. PW92-05
PROJECT:
Ynez Road Widenine - CFD 88-12
SHEET 1__ of 1__
TO CONTRACTOR: Vance Corporation
NOTE:
This chanae order is not effective until aDDroved by the Enqineer
THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR:
An INCREASE in the following item:
While the contractor was replacing the brick pavers on the east side of Ynez Road at Motor
Car Parkway, · 6" wide and 6" deep concrete band was constructed around the brick pavers
to provide for easier maintenance of the asphalt pavement.
TOTAL: $2,338.07
Original Contract Amount: ................................... $ 2,612,81 L~
Adjusted Contract Amount: ................................... $ 3,054,9(,
Change Order No. 033 ....................................... $ 2,33;~'.d7
Total Contract Amount: ..................................... $ 3,057,239.22
Adjustment of Working Days: .................................
0
Approved: Principal Engineer By: Date:
We the undersigned contractor have given careful consideration to the change proposed end hereby agree. If this proposal
is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform
all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above.
Dated Accepted:
By: 4 Title:
Contractor:
(company's
Name:
(print)
if the contractor does not sign acceptance to this order, his attention is directed to the requirements of the specifications as
to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written protest within the time therein specified.
pwO4\cip\projects~pw92-05\cco\cco33,cco 120193
FROM
Vance CorporSfidn
General Engineering Contractor
2271 N. Locust Ave., Rialto, CA 92376
TO
Speed Memo//z~Z~
Reply ['1 SOON AS
POSSIBLE
DATE:/P/Z~/f ~, [] NO REPLY
A'H'ENTION: lt~:rtt/ NEEDED
/
~Jtp
/~ c ~' ,~ /~ -
~ ?iT,
FROM
Vance Corporation
General Engineering Contractor
2271 N. Locust Ave., Rialto, CA 92376
TO
Speed Memo/
Reply
DA~: M, ~ 7 ' ~-~
ATTENTIO~.'/~
URGENT
[] SOON AS
POSSIBLE
[] NO ,;LY
NEEDED
SIGNED
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590 (909) 694-1989 · FAX (909) 694-1999
OONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 034
CONTRACT NO. PW92-05
PROJECT: Ynez Road Widenins - CFD 88-12 SHEET 1__ of I
TO CONTRACTOR: Vance Corporation
NOTE:
This chanae order is not effective until aDDroved by the Enaineer
THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR:
An INCREASE in the following item:
AS
When Rancho California Water District installed their facilities on Ynez Road their contractor
installed the field test wires for the main water line to close to the existing street surface.
During the pavement grinding phase the field test wires were destroyed. Therefore, the
contractor reinstailed new field test wires just north of Rancho California Road at Sta. 38 + 45.
TOTAL: $2,731.05
Original Contract Amount: ................................... $ 2,612,811.29
Adjusted Contract Amount: ................................... $ 3,057,239.22
Change Order No. 034 ....................................... $ 2,731.05
Total Contract Amount: ..................................... $ 3,059,970.27
Adjustment of Working Days: .................................
0
Approved: Principal Engineer By: Date:
We the undersigned contractor have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree. If this proposal
is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform
all services necessary for the work above specified, end will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above.
Dated Accepted: //~,~ Contractor:
By: ~ Title:
"'g > '
<
(company~s ;)
Name:
(print)
If the contractor does not sign acceptance to this order, his attention is directed to the requirements of ths specifications as
to proceeding with the ordered work and filing · written protest within the time therein specified.
pwO4%cip\projects\pw92-05\cco\oco34.cco 120193
FROM
/
Vance Corporation
General Engineering Contractor
2271 N. Locust Ave., Rialto. CA 92376
Speed Memo/
Reply
DATE:
TO AI'rENTION:
[] URGENT
[] ~?E
[] NO REPLY
NEEDED
//L
/,~ , a~
~/,f, Z,_,,r
;1/L4NCHA
CORPORATION
2~75 .qO. WILLOW AVE.
NOVgMBER 18, 1993
· BLOOMINGTON. CA 9231.5
VANCE CORPORATION
2271N. LOCUST AVE
RIALTO, CA 9237T
INVOICE# 93'32Z5"'
REVISE.D
PROJ~,CT: YNZZ ROAD ~qIDENING - EXTRA WORK PERFOXMED
SPEED MEMO DATED 11/12/93
TIME AND MATER'IA~$ NEeDeD TO INSTALL CATHODIC TEST WIRES ON THE"
43" WAT=R MAIN, 8' DEEP.
NOVEMBER 12, 1993
REGULAR-T!ME
CLASSI~IOATION
P32EMAN
OPERATOR
LABORER
0VER'TIME
CLASSIPICATION
FOREMAN
OPERATOR
LABORER
EQUIPMENT:
555B FORD BACKHOE;
WACXER COMPACTOR
SET 0F TORCHES.
L~DDER
CREW TRUCK
SHORING JAO~S
-(.
QUANTITY UNIT HOURLy RATE
8.00 ZRS
8.00 ZRS $47.~C-
8.00 ~RS 836
QUANTITY UNIT HOURLY'EATE~
2.00 HRS "' $G4.90
2.00 HRS $GS,gO
2.00 HRS S48.78
TOTAL ' --"-
$385.28 '...
.,...:_
$129.80 "~ .....
, ;.. ..
'SUBTOTAL SS84; 05 - .. . ;-.-..
PROFIT AND OV~R~AD
EQUIPMENT SUBTOTAL
$44 '
~-.05
MATERIAL USED:
NO. 12 TE~T
=RASING ROD
COLD MIX
MORTAR MIX
QUANTIT? UNIT· UNIT PRICE·
40'L~ N/O
~PC~ N/C ":..
0.2~ TON 24.00 .-
TOTAL
$0.00
SO.00
$6.00
S~.O0
SUBTOTAL
PROFIT AND OVERHEAD
INVOICE TOTAL'
$10.00
$1.50
$2,148.09
. s ri 0 (909) 694-1989 · FAX [909) 694-1999
PROJECT: Ynez Road Wideninq - CFD 88-12 SHEET I of 1__
TO CONTRACTOR: Vance Corooration
NOTE:
This change order is not effective until aDDroved by the Engineer
THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR:
An INCREASE in the following item:
During the placement of the Line "D" storm drain pipe it was required to install an additional
32 feet of 48" RCP pipe. This additional length of pipe allowed for the outlet of storm drain
to extend passed the new dope embankment. This is a supplemental cost to contract change
order no. 7.
TOTAL: $1,455.06
Original Contract Amount: ...................................
Adjusted Contract Amount: ...................................
Change Order No. 035 .......................................
Total Contract Amount: .....................................
$ 2,612,811.29
$ 3,059,970.27
$ 1,455.06
$ 3,061,425.33
Adjustment of Working Days: .................................
0
Approved: Principal Engineer By: Date:
We the undersigned contractor have given careful consideration to the change proposed end hereby agree. If this proposal
is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish ell materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform
all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above.
Dated Accepted: Z' ~-'/~,,-~
B'Y:"//~e)
Contractor: (company's na~*)n~
If the contractor does not sign acceptance to this order, his attention is directed to the requirements of the specifications as
to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written protest within the time therein specified.
pwO4\cip%projects\pw92-05\cco\cco35 .cco 120893
FROM
TO
Vance Corporation
General Engineering Contractor
2271 N. Locust Ave., Rialto, CA 92376
Speed Memo/
Reply
~ URGENT
POO,~E
[] NO REPLY
NEEDED
74--,--7-8 7
ITEM
NO.
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
December 14, 1993
Contract Amendment No. 1 to the Land Surveying Portion of the
Professional Services Contracts for Civil Engineering, Land Surveying,
Structural Engineering, and Soils Testing -Liefer Road Crossing (PW93-02)
PREPARED BY: ~Jim
RECOMMENDATION:
D. Faul, Assistant Engineer
That the City Council approve Contract Amendment No. I to provide additional land surveying
services for Liefer Road Crossing by NBS/Lowry in the amount of $1,895.00
BACKGROUND:
The original contract provided for construction surveying limited to providing horizontal and
vertical control for Liefer Road from the centerline of Nicolas Road to the initial crest of the hill
northerly of Santa Gertrudis Creek, including centerline elevations and top of curb elevations
on the bridge only.
The additional surveying is required to provide construction staking for the bridge abutments
and fine grading of Liefer Road street improvements.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The funding for this extra work is available in Capital Improvements Fund Number 210-166-
627-5804.
The total cost of this element of the project is summarized below.
A. Original Contract (approved 5-11-93)
B. Proposed Amendment No. 1
Total =
The additional design cost is eligible for up to 93.75% reimbursement
Emergency Management Agency.
Attachments:
Contract Amendment No. 1
$700.00
$1,895.00
$2,595.00
by the
Federal
pwl 5%agdrpt%93\1214\liefer.cco
AMENDlVIENT NO. 1
NBS/LOWRY, INC.
The Agreement dated May 11, 1993, between the City of Temecula, and NBS/Lowry, Inc. (herein referred tc
as "Agreement") is hereby mended as follows:
Professional Land Surveying Services for Lielet Road Crossing.
RE: Professional Land Surveying Services for Liefer Road Crossing
Section 1
The Scope of Work is hereby mended by adding the following activities:
Relocate Water Main and Structural Modification to Liefer Road Bridge
1.3 Provide offset stakes, 2 stakes per comer, for
abutment excavation including one (1) additional
set of stakes for abutment if lost during over-
excavation process
2.3 Provide offset stakes at 25-foot intervals for fine
grading of Liefer Road
2.4 Provide offset stakes at 25-foot intervals for
installation of A.C. dike and edge of pavement
Proposed additional cost:
Section 2
$1,895.00
All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same.
The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the Date and year above written.
CONSULTANT
CITY OF TEMECULA
By: By:
NBS/Lowry, Inc.
Mayor J. Sal Mu~oz
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field, City AtWrney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ITEM NO. 10
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY~
FINANCE OFFICE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
December 14, 1993
SUBJECT:
Liefer Road Bridge and Street Improvements Reimbursement Agreement
with the Rancho California Water District for the Reconstruction of the
12olnch Water Main (PW93-02)
PREPARED BY:/~Jim D. Faul, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the reimbursement agreement
with the Rancho California Water District for improvements in the amount of $20,500 to be
constructed by the City's Contractor for the Liefer Road Bridge and Street Improvements
Project (PW93-02).
BACKGROUND:
During the design of the Liefer Road Bridge and Street Improvements Project, the relocation
of certain Rancho California Water District water facilities was requested. The Rancho
California Water District requested the City include these items in the construction contract
for the road improvements. The City would then be reimbursed for the improvement cost.
The amount of reimbursement for the Rancho California Water District facilities is based on
the bid prices as specified under the contract awarded by the City to K.E. Patterson Co., Ltd.
for the bridge and street improvements.
FISCAL IMPACT:
All costs associated with the relocation of water facilities, including City administration costs,
will be paid for by the Rancho California Water District with no fiscal impact to the City.
Attachment:
Agreement
pw05%egdrpt~.93~1214%pw93-02
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT ~-~
BETWEEN
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIEFER ROAD BRIDGE AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. l'W 93-02
AND
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
THE AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 14th day of December, 1993, is by and between
the City of Temecula, a California Municipal Corporation, (hereinatter referred to as "CITY*), and
Rancho California Water District, a California Water District existing and operating under Division 13
of the California Water Code, (hereinafter referred W as 'RCWD').
In consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and conditions herein contained, the parties
hereto agree as follows:
Section 1. PURPOSE OF THE AGREEMENT. The purpose of this Agreement is to establish
the reimbursement to CITY by RCWD for the cost of relocating certain water improvements made
necessary by the Lider Road Bridge and Street Improvements Project, hereinafier referred to as
"PROJECT."
Section 2. RCWD shall reimburse CITY for one hundred percent (100%) of the construction
costs (hereinafter referred to as "REIMBURSEMENT"), for the relocation and adjustments of certain
water improvements within the PROJECT area that are affeaed by the PROJECT. The costs for the
REIMBURSEMENT to CITY by RCWD shall include the following item as shown within the attached
-1- pwOS~!io~r~.mm
Bid Result Spreadsheet:
A. Water Items
Extended Bid Amount
Bid Item No. 19
City Project Management
20,000.00
500.00
$20,500.00
Section 3. Costs are based on construction bids received for the PROJECT under Bid Item No.
19 shown within the attached Bid Result Spreadsheet. CITY has evaluated and analyzed all bids received
and selected the lowest responsible bidder for the PROJECT as K.E. Patterson (hereinafter referred to
as 'CONTILa, CTOR'). RCWD has reviewed the bids and approved the C1TY's selection of C1TY's
CONTRACTOR prior to the commencement of the work on the PROJECT.
RCW"D shall maintain as a contingency an mount equal to ten percent (10%) of the total
estimated costs of relocating the water facilities to account for unforeseen change orders. Prior to the
approval of any change orders associated with the relocation of these facilities, CITY shall obtain
approval from RCWD before authorizing CONTRACTOR to proceed. CITY shall make payment to
CONTRACTOR for work performed. Actual costs shall be identified and billed to RCWD for payment
on the following basis:
A. The Construction Schedule for PROJECT provides that the water facilities
relocation shall occur on or about forty-five (45) calendar days after the Notice
to Proceed for PROJECT has been issued. Fifi7 percent (50%) of the
REIMBURSEMENT shall be due and payable to CITY forty-five (45) calendar
days after the CITY has issued the Notice to Proceed.
-2- pw05~ii~f~r~-~inlnn.amt
The remaining fifty percent (50%) REIMBURSEMENT to CITY by RCWD shall
be due and payable within thirty (30) days after the entire PROJECT is accepted
as complete by CITY and RCWD.
Section 4. It is acknowledged that RCWD has reviewed and approved all CITY plans and
specifications for the relocation of the water impwvements and has approved the bid mounts as
reasonable. Management and administration of the terms expressed herein shall be performed by CITY
for the PROJECT. CITY agrees to designate Mr. Raymond A. Casey as the contact for CITY in regards
to this agreement. RCWD agrees to designate Mr. Steve Brannon as a point of contact for RCWD to
facilitate the reimbursements identified herein.
Section 5. INSP~.CTION. RCWD shall provide inspection for all water relocated facilities,
specifically, Bid Item No. 19, relocate water main and appurtenances. RCWD shall pay all inspection
costs and connection fees for Bid Item No. 19.
Section 6. NOTICES. All notices under this Agreement shall be sent as follows:
District:
Rancho California Water District
42135 Winchester Road
Temecula, California 92590
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Arm: Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - LD
Either party may change its address for notices by notifying the other party. All notices given
at the most recent address specified shall be deemed to have been properly given.
This Agreement is dated as of the date set forth above.
Distria:
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
By:
By:
City:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
By:
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
im~5~li~f~f~hnbut's.amt
ITEM NO.
15
APPROVAL (.~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
David F. Dixon, City Manager
December 14, 1993
Adoption of Final Source Reduction and Recycling Element and
Household Hazardous Waste Element
PREPARED BY: ~
RECOMMENDATION:
Phyllis L. Ruse, Senior Management Analystt~
That the City Council adopt 8 Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93- / D D
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMEMCULA ADOPTING THE FINAL SOURCE REDUCTION AND
RECYCLING ELEMENT AND HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE
ELEMENT AS PRESCRIBED BY THE CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED
WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1989
DISCUSSION:
On October 26, 1993, the City Council set December 14, 1993 at 7:00 P.M. as the time to
conduct a public hearing to take public comment and consider testimony and on the final
SRRE and HHWE prepared for the City in conformance with the California Integrated Waste
Management Act (AB 939). The public hearing has been noticed in accordance with law. The
documents were submitted to the Riverside County Solid Waste Management Advisory
Council Local Task Force for final review and have been on file with the City Clerk for public
review for at least 30 days. Copies of the SRRE and HHWE were also distributed to City
Council members on October 26, 1993 for their review end comment.
Current State law mandates that all Cities and Counties must divert 25% of their solid waste
stream from public landfills by January 1, 1995 and 50% by January 1,2000. The SRRE and
HHWE define the goals and programs established by the City to achieve the levels of diversion
required.
101393
The City has taken an aggressive stance in initiating several programs aimed at reducing solid
waste generation, recycling waste products where possible, and continuing public education
in this area. The City has already experienced great success in its efforts to divert solid waste
from landfills and anticipates complete achievement of the goals outlined in the SRRE and
HHWE.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
h~Qmdm~bpuodp !olin
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FINAL
SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENT
AND HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT
AS PRESCRIBED BY THE CALIFORNIA
INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1989
W!IEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula (the "Council"), in accordance
with the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939), has previous approved
the preliminary Source Reduction and Recycling Element (the "SRRE") and Household
Hazardous Waste Element (the "HHWE'); and
WHEREAS, at the time of approval of the preliminary SRRE and H/-IWE, the Council
also approved a Negative Declaration for this project prepared in conformance with the
California Environmental Quality Act; and
WIIEREAS, the SRRE and HHWE have been reviewed and commented on by the
California Integrated Waste Management Board, the County of Riverside ~ Task Force, and
adjoining jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, the comments of those agencies have been addressed and included in the
final SRRE and I-H-IWE; and
WHEREAS, the comments have no environmental impact upon the final SRRE and
HI-fiVE and no amendment is needed for the California Environmental Quality Act Negative
Declaration; and
WHEREAS, the Council is required by AB 939 to adopt the final SRRE and HHWE.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the City of Temecula adopts the final Source Reduction and Recycling
Element and Household Hazardous Waste Element in compliance with the California Integrated
Waste Management Act of 1989.
le%effehhwe.ree 101303
Section 2.
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of the Resolution.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMF.,CULA)
I, 3lane S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 93- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 1993, by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILI~MBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
leM~lwe.mo 101al3
ITEM
16
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning.~
December 14, 1993
Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2 (PA93-0145) and Tentative Tract
Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144), Roripaugh
PREPARED BY:
Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council:
Adopt a Negative Declaration for Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2
(PA93-0145) and Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144), Roripaugh
2. Read by title only and introduce an Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164, AMENDMENT NO. 2 (PA93-0145);
AMENDING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164 TO CHANGE THE ZONING FOR
PLANNING AREAS 7 (22.5 ACRES) AND 8 (10.1 ACRES) FROM VERY HIGH
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (12 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), TO ADD A THREE (3) ACRE
PARK AND ADJUST THE BOUNDARIES BETWEEN PLANNING AREAS 7, 8 AND
9 AND LOCATED ON THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND
NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD.
3. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164, AMENDMENT NO. 2 AMENDING
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164 (PA93-0145) TO CHANGE THE ZONING FOR
PLANNING AREAS 7 (22.5 ACRES) AND 8 (10.1 ACRES) FROM VERY HIGH
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (12 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), TO ADD A THREE (3) ACRE
PARK AND ADJUST THE BOUNDARIES BETWEEN PLANNING AREAS 7, 8 AND
9 AND LOCATED ON THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND
NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD.
R:\S~STAFFP, P~I44PA93.CC 12/3/93 kro 1
4. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 27827 (PA93-0144) TO CREATE
A 162 SINGLE FAMILY LOT SUBDIVISION PLUS A THREE (3) ACRE LOT FOR
A PUBLIC PARK WITHIN PLANNING AREA NO. 7 AND LOCATED ON THE
NORTH WEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY
ROAD.
BACKGROUND
The Planning Commission recommended approval of these items to the City Council at their
November 1, 1993 meeting with · 4-0 vote. Their main concern was the necessity of a
Home Owners Association (HOA) to maintain the wall along Nicolas Road and ensure the
enforcement of the Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions (CC & R'S).
After the Planning Commission meeting staff discovered that the property owners in the
vicinity of the project had not been notified and after further investigation it was determined
that the Title Company erred in providing the 600 foot radius property owners list. This list
is certified by the Title Company for its accuracy. After Staff learned about the error we
contacted the Home Owners Association and informed them of the details of the project and
the City Council hearing date. The applicant and the Home Owners Association President had
a meeting and they will be meeting with the other home owners on December 13, 1993. It
should be noted that a revised 600 foot radius property owners list was obtained from the
applicant and the Public Hearing Notice has been mailed to these property owners for the City
Council Hearing.
DISCUSSION
The Planning Commission felt they could not support the project without a Homeowners
Association. Without an Association, the wall along Nicolas Road would have to be
maintained by the individual home owners which could result in a wall that is not consistently
maintained and painted. After the Commission required the Home Owners Association, staff
recommended that the Home Owners Association also be responsible for the maintenance of
the alleys. However, the Commission felt the City would be better equipped to adequately
maintain them.
The Commission also discussed the availability of water to the site, the width of the
landscape parkway along Nicolas Road and the potential for graffiti on the Nicolas wall.
However, the Commission did not recommend any changes, since the Final Map may not be
recorded unless it can be served by Rancho Water and the graffiti potential will be reduced
once the proposed vegetation is mature. The width of the parkway along Nicolas Road is
proposed to be six (6) feet. The Commission after discussing the merits of requiring a wider
parking, retained the 6 foot width.
Furthermore, staff recommends amending Condition No. 59 pursuant to Commission concerns
regarding the access points to the project (refer to Attachment No. 7 for the updated Traffic
Report). The following is the recommended language (strikeout denotes a deletion and bold
R:~SL~TAFFRPT~I44PA93.CC 12/6Y93 Idb 2
denotes an addition):
59.
The draft Circulation Element of the proposed General Plan calls for an 18 foot wide
raised landscaped median along Nicolas Road per City Standard No. 100.
Consequently, should Assessment District (AD) 161 not construct the median, the
Developer shall be required to construct the median along the property frontage or pay
the fair share cost of the improvements in lieu of construction of the improvements to
provide for the raised landscaped median per City Standard No. 100.
In the event that the Developer constructs the median, it shall accommodate a left turn
pocket into Roripaugh Road. Thc modion sholl bo continuot~s ot "A" Stroct to rcstrict
oeoc3c to right turn in/out movomont if the it is to romoin ot its currently dccignod
Ioontion. The median shall also be designed to accommodate a 150 foot left turn
pocket with adequate transition into Warbler Circle, c.~.d "G" Entry Street and "D"
Stroot ond Nioolo~ ReGd ~hould thc Dovolopor ohoooc to roloooto thc noocss to thet
location. "A" Street. Left turning movements on to west bound Nicolas Road shall be
restricted with proper median design. If the median is not constructed, the developer
shall accommodate the above by striping accordingly.
FISCAL IMPACT
None·
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Ordinance No. 93- - Page 4
Resolution No. 93- - Page 7
Resolution No. 93- - Page 11
Conditions of Approval - Page 16
Draft Planning Commission Minutes, November 1, 1993 - Page 34
Planning Commission Staff Report, November 1, 1993 - Page 35
Updated Traffic Report - Page 36
Development Fee Checklist - Page 37
R:\S~STAFFRPT\I44PA93.CC 12/8193 klb 3
A'!'I'ACHMENT NO. 1
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
R:\S\STAFFRPT~I44PA93.CC 12/3/93 klb
4
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF
TEME~ APPROVING SPECI~C PIAN NO, 164, AMV~ND1VIE. NT NO.
2 (H,ANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0145) AMENDING SFECWIC PLAN
NO, 164 TO CHANGE THY~ ZONING FOR PIANNING AREAS 7
ACRES) AND 8-(10.1 ACRES) FROM VERY HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (20 DW~J J-~IG UNITS PER ACRE) TO HIGH DENSITy.
RESIDENTIAL (12 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), TO ADD A THREI~.
(3) ACRE PARK AND ADJUST TITE BOUNDARH~-S BETWEEN
PLANNING AREAS 7, 8 AND 9 AND LOCATED ON ~ NORTH WEST
CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF TBY. CITY OF TEMECULA ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Leo Roripaugh has fried PA93-0145 in accordance with applicable which is
on ~e with the City Clerk, is hereby approved.
Section 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute said Specific Plan Amendment
on behalf of the City of Temecuh after execution there of by all landowners listed therein,
provided all such landowners have executed said Specific Plan within 30 days after adoption of
this Ordinance.
Section 3. This Ordinance shah be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage. The City Clerk shah certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this
Ordinance to be posted and published as required by law.
R:\S\STAFFRPTX144PAg~.C~ 12/3/93 IrJb 5
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of December, 1993.
SAL Mtr Oz
MAYOR
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Oniinance No. 93-._ was duly introciuced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the 14th day of December, 1993, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed a regular meeting of the City Council on the __th day
of __., 1994 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
COUNCrLMEMBERS:
NOES:
CO~CILMEMB~:
COUNCrLMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F.Field
City Attorney
R:\S~TAFFRPTXI44PA93.CC 12/3193 klb 6
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
R:~S~b'TAFFRPT~I44PA93.CC 12/3/93 klb 7
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RF~OLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164, AME~MENT NO.
2 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0145') AMENDING SPECIFIC PLAN
NO. 164 TO CHANGE ~ ZONING FOR PLANNING AREAS 7 (22.~
ACRES) AND 8 (10.1 ACRES) FROM VERY lqIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (20 DWELJ2NG UNITS PER ACRE) TO tlIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (12 DWHJ. ING UNITS PER ACRE), TO ADD A THREI~,
(3) ACRE PARK AND ADJUST ~ BOUNDAIII]~-~ BETWEEN
PLANNING AREAS 7, 8 AND 9 AND LOCATED ON TIff. NORTH WEST
CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD.
Wi~REAS, Leo Roripaugh fried PA93-0145 in accordance with the Riverside County
Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by
reference;
WI~-REAS, said Specific Plan Amendment application was processed in the time and
manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Specific Plan Amendment on
November 1, 1993 at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in
support or opposition;
WI~~, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
recommended approval of said Specific Plan Amendment;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Specific Plan
Amendment on December 14, 1993, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to
testify either in support or opposition to said Specific Plan Amendment;
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff
Report regarding the Specific Plan Amendment;
NOW, T~E~~, ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLT~OWS:
Section 1. Findin~,s. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
findings:
A. The City Council in approving the proposed Specific Plan Amendment, makes the
following finding, to wit:
R:\S\STAFFRF~I44PA93.CC 12/3/93
1. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses of single family
residential since it is separated by Nicolas Road and the Santa Genrudis Creek and impacts have
been reduced to a level of insignificance.
2. The proposed action is consistent with the City's General Plan.
3. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property,
because it does not represent a significant change to the planned land use of the area, due to the
fact that the proposed land use is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element and the
overall density is being reduced.
4. The project will have a positive impact on the surrounding land uses since
it is introducing an additional new park to the area.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. A Initial Study was prepared for Specific Plan
No. 164, Amendment No. 2 and Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 and it revealed no significant
impacts that have not been mitigated to an insignificant level. Therefore, Staff recommends
adoption of a Negative Declaration.
Section 3. Conditions. Not applicable.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of December, 1993.
SAL MU OZ
MAYOR
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMF_X2ULA)
R:\S~TAFFRI~I44PA93.CC 12/3193 lab 9
I tlI~,REBY CERTWY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 14th day of
December, 1993 by the following vote of the Council:
COUNCu-MEMBERS:
NOES:
C OUNCn~MmVIBERS:
CO~CIIMEMBERS:
JUNE S. GI~PPK
CITY Ct-PRK
R:~S\STAFFRF~I44PA93.CC 12/3/93 klb 10
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
R:\S\STAFFRPT~.I44PA93.CC 12/3/93 k.lb "[ ~
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF
TEMECUIA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 27827
(PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0144) TO CREATE A 162 SINGLE
FAMilY LOT SUBDIVISION PLUS A THngg (3) ACRE LOT FOR A
PUBLIC PARK WITHIN PLANNING AREA NO. 7 AND LOCATED ON
THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH
GENERAL KE&RNY ROAD.
WltEREAS, Leo Roripaugh fried a request for PA93-0144 (Tentative Tract Map No.
27827) in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision
Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
W~EREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Time Extensions for the East Side
Maps on November 1, 1993 at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either
in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
recommended appwval of said application;
WI~REAS, the City Council considered said application on December 14, 1993, at
which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Council hearing, the Council approved said
application;
NOW, T!~-Ri~,!~ORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. That the Temecuh City Council hereby makes the following
findings:
A. Pursuant to Section 7.1 of County Ordinance No. 460, no subdivision may be
approved unless the following findings are made:
specific plans.
That the proposed land division is consistent with appficable general and
2. That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is consistent
with applicable general and specific plans.
type of development.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~I44PA93.CC 1213/93 lab
That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the
That the site of the pwposed land division is physically suitable for the
proposed density of the development.
5. That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements
are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure
fish or wildlife or their habitat.
6. That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements
are not likely to cause serious public health problems.
7. That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements
will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of,
property within the propose~ land division. A land division may be approved ff it is found that
alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially
equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to
easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent
jurisdiction.
to wit:
The Council in approving of the proposed project, makes the following findings,
1. The proposed use or action as conditioned complies with State Planning
and Zoning Laws. Reference local Ordinances No. 348, 460; and California Governmental
Code Sections 65000-66009 (Planning and Zoning Law).
2. The proposed action is consistent with the City's General Plan.
3. The Planning Commission has considered the effect of its action upon the
housing needs of the region and has balanced these needs against the public service needs of the
residents and available fiscal and environmental resources (Gov. Cod Section 66412.3) and finds
that the project density is consistent with the General Plan. Additionally, it will provide more
diversity in the housing type available to the residents of the City of Temecula.
4. The proposed project will not result in discharge of waste into the existing
sewer system that is in violation of the requirements as set out in Section 13,000 et seq. of the
California Water Code since the project has been conditioned to comply with Eastern Municipal
Water District's requirements.
as conditioned.
The project has acceptable access by means of dedicated right-of-way and
6. The project is consistent with the intent of the original project approved
by the County of Riverside.
7. The project is consistent with the provisions of Specific Plan No. 164,
Amendment No. 2.
R:~S\STAFFRPTXI44PA93.CC 1213/99 Idb 13
8. Said Findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental
documents associated with this application and heroin incorporated by reference, due to the fact
that they are referenced in the attached Staff Report, Exhibits, Environmental Assessment, and
Conditions of Approval.
C. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, the said application is compatible with the
health, safety and weftare of the community.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. A Initial Study was prepared for Spegific Plan
No. 1 (>4, Amendment No. 2 and Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 and it revealed no significant
impacts that have not been mitigated to an insignificant level. Therefore, Staff recommends
adoption of a Negative Declaration.
Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves the
said application subject to the following conditions:
A. Attachment No. 6, attached hereto.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of December, 1993.
AIT~T:
SAL MU OZ
MAYOR
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEIVlEC~)
I HEREBY CERT~Y that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, beld on the 14th day of
December, 1993 by the following vote of the Council:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMB~:
R:\S\STAFFRPTXI44PA93.CC 12/3/93 klb 14
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ----,
JUNE S. GRPPK
CITYCLERK
R:\S~TAFPRPT~I44PA93.CC 12/3/93 kib '] ~
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\S\STAFFRIq'~I44PA93.CC 12/3/93 klb 16
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. 93-0144 (Tentative Tract Map No. 27827)
Project Description: A request to subdivide a 22.5 acre parcel into 162 single family
dwelling lots and a three (3) acre open space lot for a public park (Roripaugh Cottages)
Assessor's Parcel No.:
911-150-035 end 911-150-038
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three
Hundred Twenty-Eight Dollars (91,328.00), which includes the One Thousand Two
Hundred Fifty Dollars (91,250.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish
and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(2) plus the Seventy-Eight Dollars (978.00) County
administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under
Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section
15075. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not
delivered to the Planning Department the check required above, the approval for the
project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game
Code Section 711.4(c).
General Requirements
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act
and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions
listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map
Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration
date·
The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, it
agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City
of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning
Tentative Tract Map No. 27827, which action is brought within the time period
provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula
will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the
City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly
notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully
in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend,
indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
R:\S~STAFFRPl~I44PA93.CC 12/3193 IrJb 17
If subdivision phasing is proposed, a phasing plan shall be submitted to and approved
by the Planning Director.
This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with
Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2.
The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with
Development Agreement No. 37 or any restatements or amendments thereto.
All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted
to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply
with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655.
A Mitigation Monitoring Program shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Director prior to recordation of the Final Map or issuance of Grading Permits which
ever occurs first.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Director. The plans shall include a note for dust control indicating:
A. All active areas shall be watered at least twice a day.
Non-toxic soil stabilizers shall be applied to all unpaved roads in grading and
construction areas according to the manufacturer's specifications.
Wheel washers shall be installed where vehicles exit unpaved areas into paved
roads.
All dirt hauling trucks shall be covered or they shall maintain at least two (2)
feet of freeboard.
10.
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the
appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded
by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee
required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat
Conservation plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
11.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this
stage of the development.
Prior to Recordation of the Final Map
12. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director:
A. A copy of the Final Map
B. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans
R:~S\STAlqqLuT~I44PA93.CC 12/3/93 kib 16
C. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) with the following notes:
(1)
This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar
Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with
the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory
recommendations, Ordinance No. 655.
(2) This project is within a 100 year flood hazard zone.
D. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's)
(1)
CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. The
CC&R's shall include:
(a)
Liability insurance and methods of maintaining monument signs
for the project and the wall along Nicolas Road by the Home
Owners Association. (Amended By Planning Commission on
November 1, 1993).
(b)
The individual lot landscaping, tho wall along Nioolac Rend, and
the exterior of the buildings shall be maintained by the individual
homeowners. (Amended By Planning Commission on November
1, 1993).
(c)
The wall along Nicolas Road shall be maintained by the Home
Owners Association paintad thc original color by thc individual
homoownors. (Amended By Planning Commission on November
1, 1993).
(d) No parking shall be allowed on the driveways.
(e)
Roll-up garage doors shall always be used to replace the original
garage doors for units with shared driveways.
(f)
The garage door openers and the lights on the buildings that light
the alleys shall be maintained and operational at all times.
(2)
No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a
corporation, association, property owner's group or similar entity has
been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or
jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the
common areas and common facilities in the development, such
assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity,
and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said
mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall
operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory
membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of
assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and
services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City for
provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall
R:\S\STAFFRPl~144PA93.CC 1~3,~3 klb 19
submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive
approval of, the city prior to making any such sale. This condition shall
not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. (Amended
By Planning Commission on November 1, 1993).
(3)
Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to
such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common
areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting
membership in an association owning the common areas and facilities.
(Amended By Planning Commission on November 1, 1993).
Ee
The project shall be consistent with the requirements of the French Valley
Airport Plan when the plan is adopted.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all
mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been
satisfied for this stage of the development.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
13. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director:
A. Construction landscape plans consistent with the following:
(1) City Standards.
(2) The approved Typical Conceptual Landscape Plans.
(3) Automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas.
(4)
Complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from the view of
the public from streets and adjacent property.
(5)
Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots prior to issuance
of the first building permits within each of the phases of the Final Map.
(6)
Change the California Sycamore in the Nicolas Road Conceptual Plans
to London Plane Tree.
B. Wall and fence plans consistent with the following:
(1)
All walls and fences shall be a minimum of six (6) feet measured from
the highest grade or as otherwise specified below.
(2)
A six foot six inch (6' 6") high decorative block wall or a combination
decorative block wall and berming (measured from the finished pad
elevation) shall be constructed on the rear property lines for lots 1
through 22, 103, 104 and 162, and on the side property lines for lots
1, 22, 103 and 162. These walls shall have a surface density of at
least 3.5 pounds per square foot, and shall have no openings or cracks
R:'tS\STAFFP, PT~I44PA93.CC 12/3/93 klb 20
(Refer to Preliminary Noise Analysis prepared by Mestre Greve
Associates, August 11, 1993).
(3)
Decorative block walls shall be required for the side yards for corner lots
and along the western property line (lots 103 through 121 ).
(4)
Wrought iron, decorative block or wrought iron combination walls shall
be required to take advantage of views for rear yards along the northerly
property line (lots 121 through 154) and lots 155 through 162 and the
side yard for lot 154.
(5)
Wood fencing shall be used for all side and rear yard fencing when not
restricted by (b), (c) and (d) above.
(6)
The wall along Niooloo Read shall bo oonotruotod ontiroly, including thc
footings, within tho individual Iota and not within thc public right of
~%'s7. (Amended By Planning Commission on November 1, 1993).
Ca
Precise grading plans including all structural setback measurements consistent
with the approved rough grading plans and the approved plotrings.
Elevations, floor plans and colors and materials consistent with the approved
plans.
E. The Model Home Complex Plot Plan (if applicable) which includes the following:
(1) Site Plan with off-street parking
(2) Construction Landscape Plans
(3) Fencing Plans
(4) Building Elevations
A Noise Analysis shall be submitted for review and approval for the interior
spaces within the project. The maximum interior noise level shall be 45 CNEL.
14.
Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision;
however, solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with
Planning Director approval.
15.
The applicant shall demonstrate by a written report that all mitigation measures
identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the
development.
Prior to Issuance of Occupancy Permits
16.
If deemed necessary by the Planning Director, the applicant shall provide additional
landscaping to effectively screen various components of the project.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~I44PA93.CC 12/3193 klb 2 1
17.
Front yard and slope landscaping and all fencing within individual lots shall be
completed for inspection.
18.
All the Conditions of Approval shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the
Directors of Planning, Public Works, Community Services and Building and Safety.
19.
Roll-up garage doors with automatic garage door openers shall be provided for units
with shared driveways. Automatic garage door openers shall be provided for all units.
20.
The wall and the associated landscaping along Nicolas Road shall be installed prior to
issuance of the first occupancy permit within each of the phases of the Final Map that
front Nicolas Road.
21.
The monument signs for the project shall be maintained by the Home Owners
Association opplioont and sholl bo romovod, if within right of way, prior to isc, uonoc
of tho last finol rolooso of tho projoot. (Amended By Planning Commission on
November 1, 1993).
22.
The applicant shall demonstrate by a written report that all mitigation measures
identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the
development.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true
meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department
of Public Works.
General Requirements
23.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the Tentative Tract Map all
existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and
drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for
further review and revision.
24.
A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all on-site flat work and
improvements) grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-
of-way.
25.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City
right-of-way.
26.
All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements
contiguous to the site.
R:\S\STAFFRF~I44PA93.CC 1213193 klb ~,~
27.
Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part
of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
28.
A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and
hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District for approval prior to recordation of the final map or the
issuance of any permit. A permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District is required for work within their Right-of-Way.
29.
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed
and approved by the Department of Public Works. The plan shall comply with the
Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, City Standards, and as additionally required in
these Conditions of Approval.
30.
All lot drainage shall be directed to the driveway and/or the alley by side yard drainage
swales independent of any other lot.
31.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
32.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board.
No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed with
the Regional Water Quality Control Board or the project is shown to be exempt from
that agency.
33.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region;
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District;
Planning Department;
Department of Public Works;
Riverside County Health Department;
Community Services District (TCSD);
General Telephone;
Southern California Edison Company; and
Southern California Gas Company.
34.
A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
35.
An Erosion Control Plan in accordance with City Standards, shall be prepared by a
registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval.
R:~.S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.CC 12/3t93 Idb 23
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed free condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District prior
to issuance of any permit. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has
already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or easements for any off-
site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works at no cost to any agency.
The Developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto
or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of
streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of Ordinance No. 460 will
apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited
for drainage purposes, the Developer shall provide adequate facilities as approved by
the Department of Public Works.
The Developer shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration
of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be
provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing
facilities or by securing a drainage easement.
A Flood Plain Development Permit and Drainage Study shall be submitted to the
Department of Public Works for review and approval. The drainage study shall include,
but not be limited to, the following criteria:
Drainage and flood protection facilities which will protect all structures by
diverting site runoff to streets or approved storm drain facilities as directed by
the Department of Public Works.
Adequate provision shall be made for the acceptance and disposal of surface
drainage entering the property from adjacent areas,
The impact to the site from any flood zone as shown on the FEMA flood hazard
map and any necessary mitigation to protect the site.
D. Identify and mitigate impacts of grading to any adjacent floodway.
The location of existing and post development 100-year floodplain and
floodway shall be shown on the improvement plan.
R:~S~qTAFFRPT~I44PA93.CC 1213193 Idb 24
43.
The site is in an area identified on the Flood Hazard Maps as Flood Zone "A" and is
subject to flooding of undetermined depths. Prior to the approval of any plans, this
project shall comply with Ordinance No. 91-12 of the City of Temecula, and with the
rules and regulations of FEMA for development within Flood Zone "A", which may
include obtaining a letter of map revision from FEMA.
44.
The following storm drain facilities shall be provided along with the facilities as shown
on the Tentative Map. The requirement for the underground facilities is to mitigate the
surface runoff onto Nicolas Road, the potential maintenance of the nuisance runoff
created by this development, and negate the provision of additional drainage.facilities
downstream since Assessment District 161 did not accommodate this development's
proposed runoff in sizing the downstream drainage facilities.
Catch basins shall be installed at the intersection of "G" Street and Nicholas
Road to eliminate the cross gutter.
The site shall be designed to minimize the contributory onsite runoff to Nicolas
Road at "A" Street by providing additional catch basins and storm drain pipes
or by redesigning the grades near the intersection of Nicolas Road and "A"
Street.
Prior to the Issuance of Encroachment Permits
45.
All conditions of the grading permit and encroachment permit shall be complied with
to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department.
46.
Improvement plans, including but not limited to, streets, parkway trees, street lights,
driveways, drive aisles, parking lot lighting, drainage facilities and paving shall be
prepared by a registered Civil Engineer on 24" x 36" mylar sheets and approved by the
Department of Public Works. Final plans (and profiles on streets) shall show the
location of existing utility facilities and easements as directed by the Department of
Public Works.
47.
The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans to be
submitted to the Department of Public Works:
Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
Be
Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos. 207,207A, and
208.
Ce
Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with Ordinance No. 461 and shall be shown on the improvement
plans as directed by the Department of Public Works.
5 foot wide concrete sidewalks shall be constructed per City Standard Nos.
400 and 401 specifications.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~I44PA93.CC 12/3/93 klb 25
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
Minimum centerline radii shall be in accordance with City Standard No. 113 or
as otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
All reverse curves shall include a 100-foot minimum tangent section or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as
approved by the Department of Public Works.
I. All units shall be provided with zero clearance garage doors.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
Ks
All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through under-sidewalk drains.
All driveways shall be located a minimum of 2 foot from the side property line unless
otherwise provided for with a joint use easement for ingress/egress.
In order for the City to agree to accept and maintain the proposed alleys, they shall be
subject to the following conditions:
The alleys shall be concrete paved.
· No utilities shall be installed within the alleys.
Parking shall not be permitted along the alleys and they shall be signed
accordingly.
Lights shall be installed on each garage and/or every house.
The Developer shall file an application with TCSD for inclusion of the alleys
within Service Level 'R' to provide for the maintenance of the alleys.
All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall
be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and
constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable
TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence.
All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground.
A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or
other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
R:\S~TARTRP'~I44PA93.CC 12/3193 klb 26
53.
The stop bar at the southbound Warbler Circle approach shall be positioned five (5)
feet from Nicolas Road curb line.
54. All required fees shall be paid.
Prior to Recordation of Final Map
55. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid.
56.
The Developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement
guaranteeing the construction of the following public/private improvements within 18
months in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the
Department of Public Works.
Street improvements, which may include, but are not limited to: pavement,
curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, traffic
signals and other traffic control devices as appropriate.
B. Storm drain facilities.
C. Landscaping (slopes and parkways).
D. Erosion control and slope protection.
E. Sewer and domestic water systems.
F. Undergrounding of proposed utility distribution lines.
57.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board;
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Department of Public Works;
Riverside County Health Department;
Cable TV Franchise;
Community Services District;
General Telephone;
Southern California Edison Company;
Southern California Gas Company;
Department of Fish and Game; and
Army Corps of Engineers.
R:\SXSTAFFRPT~144PA93.CC 12/3/93 klb 27
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the
public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All
dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of
Public Works.
The draft Circulation Element of the proposed General Plan calls for an 18 foot wide
raised landscaped median along Nicolas Road per City Standard No. 100.
Consequently, should Assessment District (AD) 161 not construct the median, the
Developer shall be required to construct the median along the property frontage or pay
the fair share cost of the improvements in lieu of construction of the improvements to
provide for the raised landscaped median per City Standard No. 100.
In the event that the Developer constructs the median, it shall accommodate a left turn
pocket into Roripaugh Road. The median shall be continuous at "A" Street to restrict
access to right turn in/out movement if the it is to remain at its currently designed
location. The median shall also be designed to accommodate a 150 foot left turn
pocket into Warbler Circle and "G" Entry Street and "D" Street and Nicolas Road
should the Developer choose to relocate the access to that location. If the median is
not constructed, the Developer shall accommodate the above by striping accordingly.
Sufficient right-of-way along "G" Entry Street shall be dedicated for public use to
provide for a 60 foot full width right-of-way and shall be improved with concrete curb
and gutter located 18 feet on both sides of the centerline and 36 feet of asphalt
concrete pavement, or post bonds for the street improvements, as determined by the
Department of Public Works.
Sufficient right-of-way along "A", "B", "C", and the remainder of "G" Street shall be
dedicated for public use to provide for a 50 foot full width right-of-way including the
standard knuckle, and shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter located 18 feet
on both sides of the centerline and 36 feet of asphalt concrete pavement, or post
bonds for the street improvements, as determined by the Department of Public Works.
Sufficient right-of-way along "D" , "E" , and "F" Streets shall be dedicated for public use
to provide for a 46 foot full width right-of-way and shall be improved with concrete
curb and gutter located 16 feet on both sides of .the centerline and 32 feet of asphalt
concrete pavement, or post bonds for the street improvements, as determined by the
Department of Public Works.
Sufficient right-of-way along the Alleys shall be dedicated for public use to provide for
a 20 foot full width right-of-way and the entire width shall be improved with concrete
pavement, or post bonds for the alley improvements, as determined by the Department
of Public Works.
The Developer shall file an application with TCSD for inclusion of the alleys within
Service Level 'R' to provide for the maintenance of the alleys.
Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805.
R:\S\STAFFRF~I44PA93.CC 12/3193
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
The Developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property
interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the Developer shall, prior to submittal
of the final map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the
improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section
66462.5. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the Developer of all costs
incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection
with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash
deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the Developer, at the
Developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to
commencement of the appraisal.
Vehicular access shall be restricted on Nicolas Road and so noted on the Final Map as
approved by the Department of Public Works.
A Signing and Striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
approved by the Department of Public Works for Nicholas Road and shall be included
in the street improvement plans.
Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact the Department of Public Works for
the design requirements.
Bus bays and shelters shall be provided at locations as determined by Riverside Transit
Agency and the Department of Public Works.
The joint use driveway easements shall be shown on the Final Map. No building
permits for units with joint use shall be issued until the Final Map has been recorded.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage
facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the Final Map if they are located within the
land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted
for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site
drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within
drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final
map stating "drainage easements shaft be kept free of buildings and obstructions."
An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the
final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed
with the office of the City Engineer. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the
Planning Department for review and approval. The following informatior~ shall be on
the ECS:
A. The delineation of the area within the 100oyear floodplain.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
The Developer shall deposit with the Department of Public Works a cash sum as
established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the Developer
choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into
R:~S~STAFFRPT~I44PA93.CC 1213/93 klb 29
a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of
a building permit.
76.
The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop.
Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements.
77.
A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be prepared by
the Developer and submitted to the Director of Planning, City Engineer, and City
Attorney. The CC&R's shall be signed and acknowledged by all parties having any
record title interest in the property to be developed, shall make the City a party
thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City. The CC&R's shall be reviewed and
approved by the City and recorded. The CC&R's shall be submitted to the following
Engineering conditions:
A. The CC&R's shall be prepared at the Developer's sole cost and expense.
The CC&R's shall be in the form and content approved by the Director of
Planning, City Engineer, and the City Attorney, and shall include such provisions
as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect
the interest of the City and its residents.
The CC&R's shall be recorded concurrent with the Final Map. A recorded copy
shall be provided to the City.
The CC&R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation,
management, use, repair and maintenance of all private areas.
The CC&R's shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated and
maintained so as not to create a public nuisance.
The CC&R's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition
required by the CC&R's, then the City, after making due demand and giving
reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the Owner's sole
expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&R's or the City
ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure
any such expense not promptly reimbursed.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
78.
A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for
review and approval. The building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer
for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report
addressing compact, on and site conditions.
79.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code,
the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading
Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall
be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan.
R:\S\STAF~ItP"BI44PAtY3.CC 12/3/93 klb 30
80.
The Developer shall pay the Public Facilities and Services Mitigation Fee as per the
amended Development Agreement as reviewed and approved by the City.
Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy
81.
All improvements shall be completed and in place per the approved plans, including but
not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, drainage
facilities, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets.
82. All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and striping plan.
83.
The traffic signal at Nicolas Road and Winchester Road shall be installed and
operational per the special provisions and the approved traffic signal plan.
84.
The Developer shall provide "stop" controls at the intersection of local streets with
arterial streets as directed by the Department of Public Works.
85.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersection and adjacent
to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance as directed by the Department of
Public Works.
86.
Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied only as directed by the Department of
Public Works at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform
to Section Nos. 37, 39, and 94 of the State Standard Specifications.
87.
In the event that the required improvements on Nicolas Road along the property
frontage of this development are not completed by AD 161, the Developer shall
construct the required half width improvements per City Standard No. 1 O0 or as
otherwise determined by the Department of Public Works.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
88.
A Class II Bicycle Lane on Nicolas Road shall be designed and constructed in
conformity with the City's Park and Recreation Master Plan and in concurrence with
the completion of the street improvements.
89.
Construction of the public park site, perimeter landscaping and medians shall
commence pursuant to a pre-job meeting with the developer and the City Maintenance
Superintendent. Failure to comply with the TCSD review and inspection process may
preclude acceptance of these areas into the TCSD maintenance program.
90.
The developer, or the developer's successors or assignees, shall maintain the park site,
parkway landscaping and medians until such time as those responsibilities are accepted
by the TCSD.
R:\S~STAFFRPT~I44PA93.CC 1213193 klb 3 1
All parks shall be improved and dedicated to the City free and clear of any liens,
assessment fees, or easements that would preclude the City from utilizing the property
for public park purposes. A policy of title insurance and soils assessment report shall
also be provided with the dedication of the property.
92.
All perimeter walls, interior slopes and open space shall be maintained by the individual
property owners.
Prior to Recordation of the Final Map
93.
Prior to recordation of the first phase, the developer or his assignee shall enter into an
agreement and post security to improve lot number 163, a three (3) acre site, as a
public park facility, pursuant to City Ordinance No. 460.93 (Quimby). Lot No 163 shall
be identified as a public park site and offered for dedication to the City on the final
map.
94.
Prior to recordation of the final map, the subdivider shall post security and enter into
an agreement to improve the parkway landscaping and landscaped medians within
Nicolas Road right-of-way in conformance with the City of Temecula Landscape
Development Plan Guidelines and Specifications. All proposed slopes, landscaping and
medians intended for dedication to the TCSD shall be identified on the final map as a
proposed TCSD maintenance area.
95.
Landscape construction drawings, consistent with the approved conceptual landscape
plans, for the public park site, parkway landscaping, and medians shall be reviewed
and approved by TCSD staff prior to recordation of the final map. Conceptual
landscape plans shall include a half-court basketball court.
Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy
96.
Actual development and dedication of the park to the City shall be completed
prior to issuance of the 34th certificate of occupancy, or within eighteen
months of recordation of the first phase of the final map, whichever comes
first.
97.
Prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy, the developer or his assignee shall
submit, in a format as directed by TCSD staff, the most current list of Assessor's
Parcel Numbers assigned to the final project.
OTHER AGENCIES
98.
The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined
in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal dated July 27, 1993, a copy
of which is attached.
R:~S\STAFFRPT~I44PA93.CC 12/3193 klb 32
99.
100.
101.
102.
The applicant shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in the
Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated September 20, 1993, a copy of
which is attached. If the project lies within an adopted flood control drainage area
pursuant to Section 10.25 of City of Temecula Land Division Ordinance No. 460,
appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the
City prior to issuance of Occupancy Permits.
The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the
County of Riverside Fire Department's letter dated August 3, 1993, a copy of which
is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Eastern Municipal
Water District transmittal dated July 29, 1993, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho California
Water District transmittal dated October 14, 1993, a copy of which is attached.
R:\S\STAPPR?1~I44PA93.CC 12/3/93 IrJb 33
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE · HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
July, 27, 1993
RECEIVED
CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
43 174 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
TEMECULA, CA 92590
ATTN: SaiedNaaseh:
AU6 O z~ 1993
Ans'd... ~"7
RE: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 27827: BEING A SUBDIFISION OF A
PORTION OF LOTS 182 AND 183 OF THE TEMECULA LAND AND
WATER COMPANY, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 8, PAGE 359
OF MAPS, SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDS, TOGETHER WITH THOSE
PORTIONS OF HAMILTON AVENUE, BANANA STREET, AND APRICOT
STREET, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF. THE RANCHO TEMECULA
AS SHOWN PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGE 37 OF PATENTS IN
THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY,
ALL BEING IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
(163 LOTS)
Dear Gentlemen:
The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed Tentative Tract Map No.
27827 and recommends:
A water system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as a proved
by the water cornpan and the Health Department. Permanent prints of ~et plans
of the water system '~s~all be submitted in iriplicate, with a minimum scale not less
than one inch equals 200 feet, along with the original drawing to the City of
Temecula. The prints shall show the rotereal pipe diameter, lotanon of valves and
fire hydrants; pipe and 'oint specffieations, and ~he size of the main at the junction
of the new s stem to ~ge existing system. The lans shall compl in all res ects
Admimstrihve C~'de ~tle 11 Chapter 16, and General Order No. 103 of the
Public Utilities Colllission oflhe state of California, when applicable. The plans
shall be signed by a registered engineer and water company with the following
certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Tract Map No.
27827 is in accordance with the water system expansmn plans of the Kancho
California Water District and that the water servmes, storage, and distribution
system will be adequate to provide water service to such Tract Map". This
certification does not constitute a guarantee that it will supply water to such Tract
Map at an specffic quantities flows or pressures for fire rotection or any other
purpose. ~rl~s certification sift be si ed by ares ons~bF~ official of the water
company. The plans must be submitte3~nt~ the City o~Temecula's Office to review
at least two weeks prior to the request for the recordation of the final map.
This subdivision has a statement from .... agre~ee~n~
pro~g safisfacto~ ~ci~ ~gm~ts ~e corn leted ~ ~e subdi~der. It
~I1 be necess~ for fm~ci~ ~gm~ts to be ma~ prior to ~e recordafion of
John M. Fanning, Director
4065 County Circle Drive * Riverside, CA 92503 · Phone (909) 358-5316 * FAX (909) 358-5017
(Mailing Address - P.O. Box 7600 · Riverside, CA 92513-7600)
prmred an rec'Kied paprr '~
City of Temecula Planning Dept.
Page 2
At'm: Saied Naaseh
July 27, 1993
the final map.
This subdivision is within the Eastern Municipal Water District and shall be
connected to the sewers of the District. The sewer system shall be installed
according to lans and ecifications as approved by the District, the Ci fth,~f
Temecula an~ the H~I~ Deparm~ent. Permanent ' ts of the lans of~e sewer
system shall be submitted in iri lieate, along with ~figinal ~r~w~ng, to the City
of Temecula. The prints shall ~ow the internal p_ipe diameter, location o
manholes, complete profiles, pipe and joint s ecifi~ations and the size of e
sewers at the junction of the new system to ~ existin system. A sin e p at
indicatin location of sewer lines and waterlines shall ~e a portion of ~e sewage
sewer system in Tract Map No. 27827 is in accordance with the sewer system
expansion plans of the Eastern Municipal Water District and that the waste
disposal stem is adequate at this time to treat the antici ated wastes from the
pro oseds~arcel Map". The plans must be submitted to ~ge City of Temecula's
O~f~ece to review at Ieast two weeks prior to the request for the recordation of the
It will be necessarSC_ for financial an'angements to be completely fmalized prior to
recordation of the final map.
SincereIX,
Sam Martinez, EnviromentaI Health Specialist IV
SM:dr
(909) 275-8980
KENNETH L EDWARDS
GENERAL MANAOER-CI41EF EllmercER
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
%:_? 2.
,,,: 7
(,...F'A aS-i45')
IIOSMAI~I~'TS'TFEET
~ t',n l) .
C:
DUSTY WILUAMS
':l. Zo-q'5
Very truly yours.
pan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District
comments/~ations for such cases ere normally limited to Hems of spedtic juterest to b Disidol including District Master Drainage Plan
facilities, other regional flood control end drainage radiities which could be considered a logical cc,,,pone~t or extension of a master plan system,
and District Area Drainage Ran fees (development mitigatior~ fees). In addition, informalion of a general nature is provided.
The Dis~ict has not reviewed ere proposed project in tietail and the fallowing checked oornmems do not in any way constitute or imply District
V"I This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Ptan facilities nor are other facilities of regional iracrest proposed.
~This project involves District Master Ran facilities. The District will aocept ownership of such lacilities on writlen request of the Cffi/. Facilities
' 'must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acoeptanoe. Plan check,
~ 'spection and administrative fees will be required.
VV.I , his project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in ' . .~' facilities that oould be considered regional in nature
,o..,,,, ,,. o,, .,, ,_-.,-,_,. _, .,,..,,,
ownership of such facilities on wffiten request of the F~cilities must be o)nstruct~t to District standlrds, wtd District plan check and
inspection will be required for District acceptanoe. Plan Ched~ inspectio~ and administr~ve fees will be required.
V'hisproject i$ Ioe4led within lhe limits of the District'sllellifq~~ t,~d~'le, GIl:llatl~ll,Ef Area Drainage Plan for which drainage
fees have been adopted; applicable tees ~x~uld be paid to the ~~d District or C~ prior to ~r~l approval of the project, or in the case
of a p~ro~l map or subdivision prior to recordation of th, final r~p. Fe~ to be i~id ~xald be at ~h, rate in ~:~ at th~ tir~ of r~da~ion,
or if fieferred, at lhe time of issuance of the actual permit.
rIFNFRAI INFrlR!iATI~N
This project may require a National Pollutam Discharge Bimirmio~ System (NPDES) permit from me State Water R~sources Contrd Board.
Clearanoe for grading, recoraation, or other final approval, r~uld not be given until lhe City has fiemrrnined mat the project has been grameq a
permit or is shown lo be axernpt.
If lfi$ project invll/$$ I F$18tai Effiargmlcy Marmgam$fit Agancy (FEMA) mlppad ~ plain, lh$fi Ih$ Ctly Ihould raquire lhe Ipplic, ant to
obtain a Cond'ffior~l Latter of Map Revision {CLOMR) prior to grading, r~ord~ion or olher final $~mwal of me project, and a Letter of Map
Revision (LOMR)' prior to oo:~.'pancy.
If a natural watercourse or m~Kl flood plain is impacted by Ihis project the City should require the applicanl to obtain a Section 160111603
Agreemere from the California 13~p~tment of Fish and Game and a ~ Water hi Section 404 perm~ trom 1t~ U.$. Army Corps-of
404 Water Quality Celification rt~y be required from the local C.41ifomia R~gionl Water Quality Control Bo~d prior to Ltsuance of the Corl~
404 permit.
~,d,t-.-- r ""~
' ' rg~UNTY ~.e
~JMI~S
RIVERSIDE -COUNTY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE · PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92570 * (909) 657-3183
ATTEN:
RE:
Temecula Planning Department
Saied Naaseh
PA93-0144
Tentative Tract 27827
AUgLiSt 3, 1993
With respect to the conditions of approval for the above refer-
enced land division, the Fire Department recommends the following
fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside
County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards:
i. Schedule A fire protection. An aoproved standard fire hy-
drants, (6"x4"x2 1/2") located one at each street intersection
and spaced no more than 330 feet apart or no portion of lot
frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow
shall be 1000 GPM for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI.
2. Applicant/developer small furnish one copy of the water plans
to the F;re Department for review. Plans siqall be signed be a
· __~ .....~ · . _,_.
regi~,~ civ;1 eng;neer, ~n ~ a Fire Department
~ ~ ~,, a~Droval
s~gnature Oiock, and sha].i conform to hydrant type, location,
spat;rig and minimum fire flow. Once plans are signed by the local
water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire
Department for signature.
3. Blue dot reflectors shall be mounted in private streets
driveways to indicate location of fire hydrants. They shall
mounted in the middle of the street directly in line with
and
be
fire
4 The reouired water system, includinO fire hydrants shall be
installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to
any combustible building material being placed on an inOividual
~o~.
~ RIVERSIDE OFFICE
3760 12th Street, Riverside, CA 92501
(909) 27~4777 * FAX {909) 369-7451
FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION
PI,ANNING SECTION
"1 INDIO OFFICE
79-733 Country, Club Drive, Suite F, lndiu, CA 92201
(619) 863-8886 * FAX (619) 863-7072
planted on reck'tied paper
5. Prior to th~ recor~ation of the final map~ the developer
shall deposit, with the City of Temecula~ a cash sum o~ S400.00
r:,er ~o~ ~u--~ ~ as mitigation for fire protection impacts Should
the developer choose to defer the time of Daymerit; he/she may
enter into a written agreement with the County Oefer:-ing .s. aiO
payment to the time of issuance of the first builoing oermit.
All Ouestions regarding the meaning of conditions shall
ferred to the Planning and Engineering Staff.
be re-
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
~'., ~~ ~~
Laura Cabra 1,
Fire Safety Snecial ist
J, Amtrew Schhnge
Redwine a~l Shehill ~ ~
DWector O/The MtI~. raltr ~
DUIntS o/5o"~btm Cali/ornia %~
Doyte F. Boca
Trustsre,'
Rogers M. Cox
,.,
o/D/~ctors
Chester C, Gilbert, Presite
~m, G, Al~idge, Vice Pre~.
Craig A. Wever
Marion V. Ashley
R~r D. S~ems
Mary C lYhite
luly 29, 1993
RECEIVED
AUG 2 IQi3
Saiea Naaseh, Case Planner
City of Tcmecula
Planning Department
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
SUBJECT: Tract 27827 (PA 93-0144)
Ans'd ............
Dear Mr. Naaseh::
We have reviewed the materials transmitted by your office which describe the subject project.
Our comments are outlined below:
General
It is our understanding the subject project is a proposal to subdivide 22.5 acres located between
Nicolas Rd. and the Santa Gertrudis Creek at the northwest comer of the intersection of Nicolas
and North General Kearney Rds., into 163 single family residential lots with alleys and a 3.0
acre park site.
The subject project is located within the District' s sanitary sewer service area. However, it must
be understood the available service capabilities of the District's systems are continually changing
due to the occurrence of development within the District and programs of systems improvement.
As such, the provision of service will be based on the detailed plan of service requirements, the
timing of the subject project, the status of the District's permit to operate, and the service
agreement between the District and the developer of the subject project.
The developer must arrange for the preparation of a detailed plan of service. The detailed plan
of service will indicate the location(s) and size(s) of system improvements to be made by the
developer (or others), and which are considered necessary in order to provide adequate levels
of service. To arrange for the preparation of a plan of service, the developer should submit
information describing the subject project to the District's Customer Service Department, (909)
925-7676, extension 409, as follows:
Mail To: Post Office Box E300 * San Jacinto, California 92581-8300 · Telephone (909) 925-7676 · Fax (909) 929-0257
Main Office: 2045 S. San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto · Customer Service/Engineering Annex: 440 E. Oakland Avenue, Hernet, CA
Saied Naaseh
City of Temecula
Tract 27827
July 29, 1993
Page 2
Written request for a "plan of service".
Minimum $400.00 deposit Oarger deposits may be required for extensive
development projects or projects located in "diffxcult to serve" geographic areas).
Plans/maps describing the exact location and nature of the subject project.
Especially helpful materials include grading. plans and phasing plans.
Sanitary Sewer
The subject project is considered tributary to the District's Temecula Valley Regional Water
Reclamation Facility (TVR%VRF).
The nearest existing TV'RWRF system sanitary sewer facilities to the subject project are as
follows:
15-inch diameter gravity-flow sewer aligned along Nicolas Rd. between Roripaugh and
North General Keamey Rds.
Other Issues
The District requires that onsite sewers be located within the proposed public roadways and not
alleyways.
Should you have any questions regarding these comments, please feel free to contact this office
at (909) 925-7676, extension 468.
Very truly yours,
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
David O. Crosley 7
Senior Engineer-Customer Service Department
DGC/clz
AB 93-835
(wp-mwk-TR27827.ctz)
Jrsciay October 14, 199~ 2:101m -- From '71669~917'5' -- Page 2i
SENT BY:TEId~CILA ;10-14-93; 13:02;
9086946477; # 2/3
October 14, 1993
Mr. SaiedNaaseh
City of Temccula
Planning I:}qmrmtmt
43174 Business Park Driv~
T~nscula, CA 92~90-3606
· ~JUBJI~: Tract No, 27827
The existing RCWD water storage and di,~--ibution system may not bc adequate
to provide dozncstic waler and fire protection services to the property tclimmced
above WiShln A.,~ssment Districl No. 161 (AD-161). Th~ following information
is intended to explain the Disttict's position in providing water service to this area.
The future ol~wa~ service within AI)-161 is dependent upon th~ prolmrty owners
and the County of Riverside approving :~ppleraental ftnanclng of water fnciliti~;
to servi~ the properties within RCWD boundaries.
The Distzict has received several mpests from developers in this area for RCWD
to rcvicw the current water service situation to d~-i. ine if ~e existing water
systcm can support additional d~velopment prior to the construction of additional
water supply facilities. Bas~ tapon an additionnl hydraulic analysis performed by
Traus-Pm,~c Ellgitl~,l'in~ COrlxlrdlion and nctual field fire flow te.q.~ the e*ari-~inE
sy~em can suppofl nn additional maximum daily flow or' 400 ~ Thi,: flow
equates to either 380 reaidual homing units or 115 acres of oonunem-ial
development or a combination of both. The~ ar~ some limitntions to the area that
the exisling system can sente; residential d~velop~ent is iimilr, d to artms undn- the
1,150-foot elevation and ocum.c~cial dovelopment is limilzd Io properties nlong
the Wincheer Rnad conidor at elevations under t,125 feet. Under the~
conditions, tl~ District can meet the n:sidential daily demands including a fire
flow of 1,000 glnu and th~ commemial daily de. mand~ including a maximum fire
flow of 2,500 glm3-
RCWD will requin: thnt all residential motto lsum-,ds be 1',4 ~pd~es in diameter nnd
thnt all residences instnll n prestore: regulator for future eonvmion to tlg 1380
Preamm: Zone.
~mll~l hn-.d - I~n~OIr, m. Nm ~tY - Tmst-.da,,l~dteamsla~H~D,lO.t./, !Slm/G't,-4iltl · r/d.~B!!)4r/lI4~,lG
ursday October 1/,, 1993 2:lOpm -- From '71669/,9175' -- Page 31
~ BY:TEMBCL~ ;10-14-~; 13:03;
9096946477;~ 3/3
City of Temecnla
Planning Department
Oetobcr 14, 1993
Pagc Two
The District will accept meter applications on a fn~t-comdfixst-scrved basis. Applicants must meet the
flow and devotion conditions slated above. Metcr application fees must bc paid in full at the current
rate -,it the tim~ of application. If ft,~s should inerrjse 'prior to installation of ~c walL-r meters, the
developer will have 90 days to have the metins installed or tlgy will be liable to pay the intorose in
application fees.
For those prope~es/ha! roquest R, rvic~ aP~r ~ a~!e a~ty L~ ~i~ or ~ ~ey & not m~t
~ ele~on ~fi~ ~ ~ve, ~ ~~on of ~ ~~,ing fz~fi~ i&~ fm A~
16I w~ ~ ~ prior W i~on of ~ m~ ~. ~ ~l~m~g f~iliti~ ~ iis~
~low:
I. A54-ineh water majn, paralld to W'mches~r Rand, fxom 1-15 to Margarim Road;
A 1380 Pressure Zone pump station near the intersection of Margarita Road and Wincheer
Road;
A water main in/vhrgnrita Road that is 30 inches in dianaeler from tl~ pump ion to Rustic
Glen Drive, 30 inches to Date ~ and 30 inches along Dam Strt~t to Winchest~ Road;
A 24-inch waterline from the interaction of Margarila Road and Winchester Road to North
General Kcarny Road;
5. A eormecAion to the 1380 Pressure Zone at North General Keamy Road and Nicolas Road.
As .~ued above, it may be necessary tin- the devcio~ Io upgradc rite cxistlnp. water system to provide
sufficient pressure for domestic and fire protection purposes. It may also be ncce.,aary for the eclevdoper
to install off-sit= facilities to muct the dentands of this propcrty. Howevc=, this does not constitute a
guarantee that RCWD will supply water la .said parcel at any sl~ific quantity, flow, or lrnv~sure for fire
protection or for any other purpose. Water availability would be conlingent upon the propcity owner
si/~ming an Agency Agreement which assigns water management righL% if any, to RCWD.
if you should have any questions, plca~ contact us.
Sincerely,
RANClIO CALU:ORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Bratmozk P.E.
~evelopment Engineering Manager
.:u:SD :eblOiF267
Seng-a Doherty, Engineering Technician
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, NOVEMBER 1, 1993
R:~S\STAFFRIq~I441mA93.CC 12/3/93 klb 34
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBt:R 1. 1993
Director Thornhill asked if the Commission wants to leave determination of the base
road material with the County fire agency.
Commissioner Hoegland said he feels it is the City's obligation to bring areas up to
urban standards.
Commissioner Fahey said the City is an urban area however, there are several rural
areas in the City that want to remain rural. Commissioner Fahey said she favors some
leniency, however if it was to be an all weather road. If it is going to be a public right-
of-way, the Commission should approve it with the appropriate conditions based on
the ordinance.
It was moved by Commissioner Hoegland, seconded by Commissioner Blair to close
the public hearing at 7:20 P.M. and Adoot Resolution No. 93-26 approving PA93-
0179, Amendment No. I based on the analysis and findings contained in the staff
report and subject to the Conditions of Approval, deleting Condition No. 10.
The motion was carried as follows:
AYES:
4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Hoagland, Ford
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
e
PA 93-0145 (Soecific Plan No. 164. Amendment No. 2)
PA 93-0144 (Tentative Tract Mao No. ~7827)
A proposed request for Approval of Amendment No. 2 to Specific Plan No. 164 in
order to Change the Zoning for Planning Areas 7 (22.5 acres) and 8 (10.1 acres) from
Very High Density Residential (20 Dwelling Units Per Acre) to High Density Residential
(12 Dwelling Units Per Acre), to add a three (3) acre park and adjust the boundaries
between Planning Areas 7, 8 and 9 and approval of Tentative Tract Tract Map No.
27827, a 162 single family lot subdivision plus a three (3) acre lot for a public park
within Planning Area No. 7.
Planner Salad Naaseh presented the staff report. He advised the Commission the
applicant does not wish to form a Homeowners Association. He said staff has worked
with the applicant to resolved many issues. Changes to the Conditions of Approval
were distributed by memorandum dated November 1, 1993 from the Planning
Department.
Chairman Ford opened the public hearing at 7:40 P.M.
Sanford Edward, 110 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, representing the
applicant, provided an overview of the project's history.
PCMIN11101193
-6- 11 I15/93
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBI=R 1.1993 ~
Commissioner Fahey suggested the formation of a Homeowners Association would
make maintenace of the block walls more cost-effective to the individual homeowner.
Patrick Callahan, landscape architect for the project, explained his discussions with the
Community Services Director regarding the wall materials and how to handle potential
vandalism of the wall.'
Commissioner Hoagland said he agrees once the vegetation grows and covers the wall,
the wall will require very low maintenance however, it will take approximately 3 to 5
years for that plant material to grow and cover the walls. Commissioner Hoagland said
a Homeowners Association would cost the individual property owners very little and
allow them an avenue to resolve their problems without involving the City.
Director Thornhill said the City now owns graffiti removal equipment and can
appropriately remove graffiti from public view.
Commissioner Blair said she does not recall the Planning Commission reviewing any
other project this complex that did not .have a Homeowners Association.
Commissioner Blair said she is not pleased by the reduction in the parkway from 10'
to 6' on one side of the street, and would like to see consistency on both sides of the
street. She said she feels the City is giving up several qualities that are important to
a Temecula project and she does not feel the project is at the appropriate stage for
approval.
Commissioner Hoagland said he feels that a Homeowners Association is important to
the project. He said he feels the concept is good; however, he cannot support the
project without the Homeowners Association. He said he is concerned with the berm
outside the wall; however, he said he does not feel it is important to the approval.
Director Thornhill explained the purpose of the berm was to reduce the apparent height
of the wall as viewed from the street.
It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Blair to close
the public hearing at 8:20 P.M. and Recommend Adoorion of Resolution No. 93-27,
recommending approval for: Planning Application Nos. 93-0144 and 93-0145 (Specific
Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2, and Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 based on the
analysis and findings contained in the staff report and subject to the Conditions of
Approval as modified by staff and Recommend Adoption of Negative Declaration for
PA93-0144 and P93-0145 and direct staff to draft conditions necessary to require the
applicant to provide a community or homeowners association.
Sanford Edward, the applicant's representative, concurred with the addition of a
condition requiring the formation of homeowners association.
Ray Casey said because there was no homeowners association, staff included
maintenance of the alleys in Zone R of the Community Services Facilities Districts. He
PCMIN11/01193 -7- 11115/93
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 1, 1993
suggested that maintenance of the alleys be placed under the homeowners association.
Commissioner Hoagland said he feels the City is better ecluipped to make a
determination on when maintenance should be done on the alleys, therefore, the
motion was not amended as Mr. Casey suggested.
The motion was carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Hoagland, Ford
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Director Thornhill advised the Commission a workshop on implementing the General Plan
Village Concept is proposed for November 18, 1993.
Mr. Thornhill advised the Commission of a proposal by Zev Buffman for the Old Town area.
PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION
None
OTHER BUSINESS
None
ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission will be held on
Monday, December 6, 1993, 6:00 P.M., at Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive,
Temecula, California.
Chairman Steve Ford
Secretary
PCMIN 11 I01193 -8- 11 I15/93
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT, NOVEMBER 1, 1993
R:\S\STAFFRPT~I44PA93.C~3 1213/93 klb 35
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
November 1, 1993
Case No.: Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2 (PA93-0145)
Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-01 ~. *. )
Prepared By: Saied Naaseh
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission:
RECOMMEND ADOPTION of Resolution No. 93-
recommending Approval for: Planning Application Nos.
93-0144 and 93-0145 (Specific Plan No. 164,
Amendment No. 2, and Tentative Tract Map No. 27827
based on the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff
Report and subject to the attached Conditions of
Approval.
RECOMMEND ADOPTION of Negative Declaration for
PA93-0144 and PA93-0145.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Leo Roripaugh
REPRESENTATIVE:
Sanfo~d Edward, MPD
Don Lohr, Lohr + Associates
PROPOSAL:
A Request for Approval of Amendment No. 2 to Specific Plan
No. 164 in order to Change the Zoning for Planning Areas 7
(22.5 Acres) and 8 (10.1 Acres) from Very High Density
Residential (20 Dwelling Units Per Acre) to High Density
Residential (12 Dwelling Units Per Acre), to add a three (3) acre
park and adjust the boundaries between Planning Areas 7, 8 and
9; and Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 27827, a 162 single
family lot subdivision plus a three (3) acre lot for a public park
within Planning Area No. 7.
LOCATION:
Located on the north west corner of Nicolas Road and North
General Kearny Road
EXISTING ZONING:
Planning Area 7: Very High Density Residential: (14.9 Dwelling
Units Per Acre)
Planning Area 8: Office
R:\S\STAFFRPT\144PA93.PC 10/28/93 klb
SURROUNDING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING
LAND USES:
North: Santa Gertrudis Creek
South: Specific Plan No. 164, Medium High Density
Residential (5.1 Dwelling Units Per Acre)
East: R-2 (Multiple Family Dwellings)
West: R-R (Rural Residential)
Planning Area 7 and 8: High Density Residential (12 Dwelling
Units Per Acre)
Vacant
North: Vacant
South: Single Family Residential
East: Vacant
West: Vacant
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.PC 10/28/93 klb 2
PROJECT STATISTICS
Project Site Area (acres)
Density (dwelling units per acre)
Maximum Number of Dwelling Units
Number of Dwelling units Proposed
Park Site Area (acres)
Private Open Space Area (square
feet)
Minimum Lot Size (square feet)
Minimum Lot Width (feet)
Minimum Lot Depth (feet)
Minimum Front Setback (feet)
Minimum Rear Setback (feet)
Minimum Side Setback (feet)
PLANNING AREA 7
22.5
12
243
162
3.0
N/A
3,400
40
85
10
5
5
**'10
Maximum Building Height (feet) 35
Floor Area (square feet)
Plan 1 1,012
Plan 2 1,125
Plan 3 1,160
Plan 4 1,340
Plan 5 1,460
PLANNING AREA 8
10.1
12
'121
*202
**0.75
First Story 150
Upper Stories 100
7,200
N/A
N/A
One Story 20
Two Story and Up 25
One Story 20
Two Story and UP 25
One Story 15
Two Story 20
Three Story 25
50
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
A transfer of density from Planning Area 7 increases the density of Planning
area 8 from 12 to 20 dwelling units per acre and increases the number of
dwelling units from 121 to 202.
* * The 0.75 acre area will be private common area.
* * * For zero lot line developments.
R:~S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.PC 10/28/93 klb 3
BACKGROUND --,,
Specific Plan 164 was approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors in 1985 and
was subsequently amended by the County in 1988.
The applicant met with staff on several occasions regarding the tentative map prior to
submittal of the project. The applicant's goal was to propose a project that would be
compatible with the surrounding uses and at the same time would provide an opportunity for
the applicant to develop the site immediately after approval. During these meetings, it was
determined that a Specific Plan Amendment would be required to accomplish the applicant's
goal.
This project was submitted on July 9, 1993 and was scheduled for a Development Review
Committee Meeting (DRC) on August 5, 1993. The issues identified at the DRC meeting
included:
·
·
·
·
·
Density transfers between Planning Area 7 and 8
Requirement of a median for Nicolas Road
Width of the parkway on Nicolas Road
Providing access from Planning Area 7 to Winchester Road through Planning
Areas 8 and 9
Traffic concerns at the intersection of Nicolas Road and Winchester Road with
emphasis on left turn movements
Noise impacts on the project from the traffic on Nicolas Road
Maintenance of alleys, walls and side yard landscaping
Proximity of the site to the French Valley Airport Influence area
Lot sizes and the ultimate product type that will be built on the site
Location, design and timing of the park
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project consists of a Specific Plan Amendment and a Tentative Tract Map.
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164, AMENDMENT NO. 2
The Specific Plan Amendment changes the zoning of Planning Areas 7 and 8 from Very High
Density Residential (14.9 dwelling units per acre) and Office to High Density Residential (12
dwelling units per acre). This amendment also allows for a transfer of density between
Planning Areas 7 and 8 and allows a total of 364 dwelling units within these Planning Areas.
It also adds a three (3) acre park to Planning Area 7, adjusts the boundaries between Planning
Areas 7, 8 and 9, and allows using street cross sections of 46 and 50 feet as opposed to the
conventional 60 foot right-of-way.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 27827
The tentative map subdivides a 22.5 acre parcel into 162 single family lots and a three (3)
acre park on the east side of the site (refer to Exhibits D and E). The access to the park is
provided from General Kearny Road and two access points are provided from Nicolas Road
to the tract. The streets within the tract are narrower than the standard sixty (60) foot right-
of-way street section with forty six (46) and fifty (50) foot right-of-ways. Additional
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.PC 10128/93 klb 4
circulation is provided by alleys (twenty feet wide). The minimum lot size for the tract is
3,400 square feet which has been established by the Specific Plan amendment.
Accompanying the map are elevations, floor plans, colors and materials, typical plottings,
typical front yard landscape plans and conceptual landscape plans for the park and Nicolas
Road.
ANALYSIS
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 27827
The following includes discussion of the issues regarding the map:
Development Aareement
Development Agreement No. 37 was approved by the County in 1988. This project has been
conditioned to comply with this Development Agreement or any restatements or amendments
thereto. The applicant has been negotiating with the City to enter into a new Development
Agreement which may reduce the current impact fees. The Development Agreement will be
brought back to the Planning Commission under a separate Staff Report.
Home Owners Association
The project will have Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions (CC&R's); however, it will not
have a Home Owners Association (HOA). Initially, staff requested an HOA to maintain the
common areas such as the alleys, side yard landscaping for the corner lots and the wall along
Nicolas Road. However, the applicant does not wish to form an HOA for this project, since
the future homeowners will be burdened by the HOA dues as the project is entry level
housing. Therefore, he is proposing to eliminate all common areas by dedicating the alleys
to the City. Individual home owners will maintain the side yard landscaping and the wall on
Nicolas Road.
In order for the Public Works Department to maintain the alleys, they will be constructed with
concrete to reduce the maintenance costs, parking and speed limits will be restricted and
automatic garage door openers will be required.
Moreover, in order for the individual home owners to maintain the side yard landscaping, the
applicant has been required to connect the side yard irrigation to the front yard irrigation to
reduce the chances of the homeowner turning off the irrigation for the side yard (refer to
Exhibit F). The wall on Nicolas Road has been moved from the edge of the right-of-way to
inside the individual lots; therefore, the individual homeowners will be responsible for
maintaining the portion of the wall within their property. The CC&R's include a provision that
the same color be used when the homeowners are painting their walls.
R:\S%STAFFRPT\144PA93.PC 10/28/93 klb 5
Nicolas Road Improvements --,
Assessment District 161 is scheduled to start construction of full improvements of Nicolas
Road in 1994 which will include improving it from Winchester Road to Joseph Road. This
improvement will not include a median as proposed on the Draft General Plan Circulation
Element. This project has been conditioned to pay its fair share to construct this landscaped
median consistent with City standards.
The City will also install a interim traffic signal in 1994 at the intersection of Nicolas Road and
Winchester Roads. Currently the improvement plans for this signal are being prepared.
A copy of the Traffic Study Summery has been included as Attachment No. 4.
Noise Impacts
A Noise Analysis was performed for the map which has identified impacts on the project.
According to this study, mitigation measures included in the conditions of approval will reduce
the impacts to insignificant levels. These conditions require six foot six inch (6' 6") high
decorative block walls or a combination of berming and block walls measured from the pad
elevation. These walls will be constructed on the rear property lines for lots I through 22,
103, 104 and 162, and on the side property lines for lots 1, 22, 103 and 162.
Additionally, the applicant will submit a Noise Analysis prior to issuance of building permits
to determine the mitigation measures necessary to limit the interior noise levels to 45 CNEL.
This study will need to be performed with the benefit of the architectural drawings and the
precise grading plans.
Walls and Fences
In addition to above walls required by the Noise Analysis, a decorative block wall is also
required along the western property line (lots 103 through 121 ) and the side yards for corner
lots. The applicant has the option of providing wrought iron, decorative block wall or a
combination of the two to take advantage of views along the northern property line (lots 121
through 154) and lots 155 through 162 and the side yard for lot 154. These lots are either
adjacent to Santa Gertrudis Creek or the park. All other interior fencing may be wood fencing.
Product TvDe
The map was submitted without the benefit of the elevations, floor plans and typical plotrings
and front yard landscaping. After reviewing this map with proposed minimum lot sizes of
3,400 square feet and alleys, staff requested the applicant to submit the above information
to demonstrate that the product type proposed meets the quality of development desired by
the City. Moreover, it was necessary to see how these houses will fit the proposed lots and
how the applicant was proposing to take advantage of the alleys.
The applicant is proposing five (5) models that range from 1012 to 1460 square feet in size.
These units include three (3) to four (4) bedrooms and two car garages (refer to Exhibits J,
K, L, M and N). The architecture is mediterranean with stucco exterior and tile roofs (refer
to Exhibits I, J1, J2, J3, K1, K2, K3, L1, L2, L3, M1, M2, M3, M4, N1, N2 and N3). The
entry to the garages is possible with three (3) different variations: conventional front entry,
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA83.PC 10/28/93 klb 6
shared side entry and alley rear entry (refer to Exhibit G). The project has been conditioned
to restrict parking on all driveways, since the front entry driveways are only ten (10) feet
long, the side entry driveway needs to be kept free of parked cars since parked cars will block
the entry to the garages and in case of rear entry garages, parking in front of the garages will
encroach into the alleys.
Imorovement of Santa Gertrudis Creek
The construction of Santa Gertrudis Creek is the responsibility of Assessment District 161.
According to the Assessment District this construction will commence in 1994. Final releases
will not be issued for this project until the construction of the creek is complete as determined
by the Riverside County Flood Control.
Nicolas Road Parkway Width
The proposed map only allows for a six (6) foot wide landscaped parkway between the
sidewalk and the property line (refer to Exhibit H1 and H2). However, across the street from
the project site the width of the parkway is approximately ten (10) feet wide. Staff requested
the applicant to match this width; however, the applicant has maintained a position that the
six (6) foot parkway is sufficient to provide a pleasing streetscape and a larger parkway will
further reduce the lot sizes (refer to Attachment 5).
Park
The proposed three (3) acre park will be improved by the applicant as a turn key operation
prior to issuance of the final release of the thirty fourth (34th) dwelling unit or within eighteen
(18) months of the recordation of the first phase of the Final Map, whichever comes first.
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164. AMENDMENT NO. 2
The following includes a discussion of the issues regarding the Specific Plan Amendment:
Boundary Chanoes
The Specific Plan Amendment will change the boundaries of Planning Areas 7, 8 and 9 which
will result in changes in the areas of these Planning Areas. The following represents these
changes:
Approved
Proposed
Note:
: PLANNING AREA 7 :PLANNING.-AREA 8: .:PLANNING :AREA-9 .:
18.16 4.83 26.69
23.60 10.1 20.18
The above totals are not equal due to Santa Gertrudis Creek and street right-of-way
areas.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~,144PA93.PC 10/28/93 Idb
7
Density Transfer
As a part of the Specific Plan Amendment, a zone change and a density transfer is proposed
for Planning Areas 7 and 8. The current Specific Plan Zone Designation of Very High Density
allows for the construction of 271 multi family units and a 4.83 acre commercial office parcel.
The zone change for Planning area 7 and 8 converts the zoning from Very High Density
Residential (maximum 14.9 Dwelling units per acre) and Office, respectively, to High Density
Residential (maximum of 12 .Dwelling Units Per Acre). The density transfer allows the
construction of 364 dwelling units within Planning Areas 7 and 8. This density transfer is
consistent with the General Plan density for Medium Density Residential (maximum of 12
dwelling units per acre) which could result in 390 dwelling units.
The proposed tract map includes 162 single family lots. With benefit of the density transfer,
Planning Area 8 could be developed with 202 multi-family dwellings at a density of 20
dwelling units per acre. Since this density is higher than the usual 14-15 dwelling units per
acre approved by the City for multi family projects, a few provisions have been included in the
Zoning Ordinance of Planning Area 8 which requires development of a 0.75 acre recreational
area which may include basketball, volleyball, barbecue, picnic areas, tot lots and open lawn
areas. Moreover, private open space areas such as patios and balconies are required for each
dwelling unit at a rate of 150 square feet for first story units and 100 square feet for upper
story units.
Buffering The Planninc~ Areas
Since the zoning for Panning Area 8 has been changed from Office to High Density Residential
and Planning Area 9 to the west of Planning Area 8 has been approved for retail shopping
center, there is a necessity to provide a buffer between these two Planning Areas. Staff and
the aDDlicant have agreed to a twenty five (25) foot landscaped buffer. It should be noted
that a buffer has not been proposed between Planning Areas 7 and 8, since the Zoning
Ordinance for Planning Area 8 requires a twenty (20) foot setback for two story buildings and
the rear yard setbacks for the single family dwellings proposed on lot 103 through 121 is a
minimum of sixteen (16) feet. Therefore, a minimum of 36 feet will separate the buildings
within these two Planning Areas.
FUTURE GENERAL PLAN, ZONING, AND SWAP CONSISTENCY
Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2
This project will likely be consistent with the future General Plan since the Draft General Plan
currently designates the site as Medium Density Residential. This project is consistent with
the Southwest Area Plan (SWAP) which designates the site as Specific Plan No. 164. This
project is consistent with the intent of Specific Plan No. 164 Amendment No. 1.
Tentative Tract MaD No. 27827
This project will likely be consistent with the future General Plan since the Draft General Plan
currently designates the site as Medium Density Residential. This project is consistent with
the Southwest Area Plan (SWAP) which designates the site as Specific Plan No. 164. This
project is consistent with Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2's High Density zone since
it meets all the requirements for this zone.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.PC 10/28/93 klb 8
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
A Initial Study was prepared for Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2 and Tentative Tract
Map No. 27827 and it revealed no significant impacts that have not been mitigated to an
insignificant level. Therefore, Staff recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The Specific Plan Amendment and the Tentative Tract Map decrease the number of multi
family units from 271 to 202, allow the development of 162 single family dwelling units, and
add a fully improved three (3) acre public park. Moreover, the multi family portion of the
project includes a 0.75 common open space which was not required in the previously zoned
271 unit project. The environmental impacts of the project have been reduced to insignificant
levels with the mitigation measures included in the Conditions of Approval.
FINDINGS
Soecific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2
There is a reasonable probability that Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2 will be
consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable
time and in accordance with State law, due to the fact that the subject request is
consistent with the SWAP Designation of Specific Plan and is in substantial
conformance with Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 1.
e
There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the
future General Plan if Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2 is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan, due to the fact that approval of such an amendment will
ensure orderly development of the area and the significant environmental impacts have
been mitigated.
The project is compatible with surrounding land uses of single family residential since
it is separated by Nicolas Road and the Santa Gertrudis Creek and impacts have been
reduced to a level of insignificance.
The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does
not represent a significant change to the planned land use of the area, due to the fact
that the proposed land use is consistent with the Draft General Plan Land Use Element
and the overall density is being reduced.
The project will have a positive impact on the surrounding land uses since it is
introducing an additional new park to the area.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93,PC 10/28/93 klb 9
Tentative Tract MaD No. 27827 ~-~
There is a reasonable probability that Tentative Tract Map 27827 will be consistent
with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and
in accordance with State law. The project, as conditioned, conforms with existing
applicable city zoning ordinances and development standards. Furthermore, the
proposed density of the project is consistent with the future General Plan Land Use
Designation of Medium. Density Residential.
There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with the
City's future General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the Plan,
since the surrounding land uses are single family dwellings.
The proposed use or action as conditioned complies with State planning and zoning
laws. Reference local Ordinances No. 348,460; and California Governmental Code
Sections 65000-66009 (Planning and Zoning Law).
The Planning Commission has considered the effect of its action upon the housing
needs of the region and has balanced these needs against the public service needs of
the residents and available fiscal and environmental resources (Gov. Cod Section
66412.3) and finds that the project density is consistent with SWAP and the future
General Plan. Additionally, it will provide more diversity in the housing type available
to the residents of the City of Temecula.
The proposed project will not result in discharge of waste into the existing sewer
system that is in violation of the requirements as set out in Section 13,000 et seq. of
the California Water Code since the project has been conditioned to comply with
Eastern Municipal Water District's requirements.
The project has acceptable access by means of dedicated right-of-way and as
conditioned.
The project is consistent with the intent of the original project approved by the County
of Riverside.
The project is consistent with the provisions of Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No.
2.
Said Findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental documents
associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference, due to the fact
that they are referenced in the attached Staff Report, Exhibits, Environmental
Assessment, and Conditions of Approval.
R:\S~,STAFFRP'I'~14.4PA93.PC 10/28/93 klb 10
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
PC Resolution - Blue Page 12
Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 17
Initial Study - Blue Page 34
Traffic Study Summary - Blue Page 49
Applicant's Correspondence on Parkway Landscaping Width - Blue Page 50
Exhibits - Blue Page 51
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.PC 10128/93 Idb 11
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 93-
R:\S\STAFFRPT%144PA93.PC 10/28/93 kJb 12
ATTACHMP:~ NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF
TEMECULA RECO1VIIVIENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 92,-0145 (SPECI~C PLAN NO. 164, A1VIF. ND1VIENT
NO. 2) AND PLANNING APPLICATION NO.93-0144 (TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP NO. 27827) TO APPROVE AIVH~.NDMENT NO. 2 TO
SPECWIC PLAN NO. 164 IN ORDER TO CHANGE THE ZONING FOR
PLANNING AREAS 7 (22.5 ACRES) AND 8 (10.1 ACRES) PROM VERY
HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (20 DWI~J .IJNG UNITS PER ACRE) TO
HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (12 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), TO
ADD A THREE (3) ACRE PARK AND ADJUST ~ BOUNDAIIIF~S
BETWEEN PLANNING AREAS 7, 8 AND 9; AND APPROVAL OF
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 27827, A 162 SINGI.I~- FAMII.Y LOT
SUBDIVISION PLUS A THREE (3) ACRE LOT FOR A PUBLIC PARK
WITHIN PLANNING AREA NO. 7.
WItEREAS, Leo Roripaugh ~ed Planning Application No. 92-0145 (Specific Plan No.
164, Amendment No. 2 and Planning Application No. 93-0144 (Tentative Tract Map No. 27827)
in accordance with the Riverside County l~nd Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision
Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said applications were processed in the time and manner prescribed by State
and local hw;
WtlEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said applications on November 1,
1993, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or
opposition;
WItEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
recommended approval of said applications;
NOW, T!tT. REFORE, ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOIJI3WS:
Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the
following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall
adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month
period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the
following requirements are met:
R:\SXSTAFFRP'T'%144PA93.PC 10/28/93 klb 13
general plan.
The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the
2. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, each of the following:
a. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action
proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which
will be studied within a reasonable time.
b. Them is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan ff the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as mended by the Southwest Area
Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as
the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan
guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General
Plan.
C. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of said applications makes
the following findings, to wit:
Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2
1. There is a reasonable probability that Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment
No. 2 will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a
reasonable time and in accordance with State law, due to the fact that the subject request is
consistent with the SWAP Designation of Specific Plan and is in substantial conformante with
Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 1.
2. Them is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future General Plan ff Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2 is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan, due to the fact that approval of such an amendment will ensure
orderly development of the area and the significant environmental impacts have been mitigated.
3. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses of single family
residential since it is separated by Nicolas Road and the Santa Gemdis Creek and impacts have
been reduced to a level of insignificance.
R:\S\STAFFRP'T'%144PA93.PC 10/28193 klb 14
4. · The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property,
because it does not represent a significant change to the planned land use of the area, due to the
fact that the proposed land use is consistent with the Draft General Plan Land Use Element and
the overall density is being reduced.
5. The project will have a positive impact on the surrounding land uses since
it is introducing an additional new park to the area.
Tentative Tract Map No. 27827
1. There is a reasonable probability that Tentative Tract Map 27827 will be
consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and
in accordance with State hw. The project, as condi~oned, conforms with existing applicable
city zoning ordinances and development standards. Furthermore, the proposed density of the
project is consistent with the future General Plan Land Use Designation of Medium Density
Residential.
2. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment W, or interference
with the City's future General Plan, ff the pwposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the Plan,
since the surrounding land uses are single family dwellings.
3. The proposed use or action as conditioned complies with State Planning
and Zoning Laws. Reference local Ordinances No. 348, 460; and California Governmental
Code Sections 65000-66009 (Planning and Zoning Law).
4. The Planning Commission has considered the effect of its action upon the
housing needs of the region and has balanced these needs against the public service needs of the
residents and available fiscal and environmental resources (Gov. Cod Section 66412.3) and finds
that the pwject density is consistent with SWAP and the future General Plan. Additionally, it
will provide more diversity in the housing type available to the residents of the City of
Temecula.
5. The proposed project will not result in discharge of waste into the existing
sewer system that is in viohtion of the requirements as set out in Section 13,000 et seq. of the
California Water Code since the pwject has been conditioned to comply with Eastern Municipal
Water District's requirements.
as conditioned.
The project has acceptable access by means of dedicated right-of-way and
7. The project is consistent with the intent of the original project approved
by the County of Riverside.
e
Amendment No. 2.
The project is consistent with the provisions of Specific Plan No. 164,
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93 .PC 10128193 klb 15
9. Said Findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental
documents associated with this application and heroin incorporated by reference, due to the fact
that they are referenced in the attached Staff Report, Exhibits, Environmental Assessment, and
Conditions of Approval.
D. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, said projects are compatible with the health,
safety and weftare of the community.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. A Initial Study was prepared for Spe~.ific Plan
No. 164, Amendment No. 2 and Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 and it revealed no significant
impacts that have not been mitigated to an insignificant level. Therefore, Staff recommends
adoption of a Negative Declaration.
Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula PlaDning Commission hereby
recommends approval of Planning Application No. 93-0145 (Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment
No. 2 and Planning Application No. 93-0144 (Tentative Tract Map No. 27827) located on the
northwest comer of Nicolas Road and North General Kearny Road subject to the following
conditions:
A. Attachment No. 2, attached hereto.
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of November, 1993.
STEVEN F. FORD
CHAIRMAN
STATE OF CALrFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I [rEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 1st day of
November 1993 by the following vote of the Commission: '.
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
G~Y~ORNHILL
SKRET~Y
R:\S\STAFFRP'T'%144PA93,PC 10128/93 klb 16
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\S',STAFFRPT%144PA93.PC 10/28/93 Idb
17
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. 93-0144, (Tentative Tract Map No. 27827)
Project Description: A request to subdivide a 22.5 acre parcel into 162 single family
dwelling lots and a three (3) acre open space lot for a public perk (Roripaugh Cottages)
Assessor's Parcel No.:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
911-150-035 and 911-150-038
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three
Hundred Twenty-Eight Dollars (~ 1,328.00), which includes the One Thousand Two
Hundred Fifty Dollars (~1,250.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish
and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(2) plus the Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) County
administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under
Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section
15075. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not
delivered to the Planning Department the check required above, the approval for the
project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game
Code Section 711.4(c).
General Requirements
e
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act
and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions
listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map
Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration
date.
e
The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, it
agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City
of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning
Tentative Tract Map No. 27827, which action is brought within the time period
provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula
will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the
City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly
notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully
in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend,
indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
e
If subdivision phasing is proposed, a phasing plan shall be submitted to and approved
by the Planning Director.
R:\S\STAFFRP"F~144PA93.PC 10/28/93 klb 18
This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with
Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2.
The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with
Development Agreement No. 37 or any restatements or amendments thereto.
All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted
to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply
with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655.
A Mitigation Monitoring Program shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Director prior to recordat,on of the Final Map or issuance of Grading Permits which
ever occurs first.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Director. The plans shall include a note for dust control indicating:
A. All active areas shall be watered at least twice a day.
Non-toxic soil stabilizers shall be applied to all unpaved roads in grading and
construction areas according to the manufacturer's specifications.
Wheel washers shall be installed where vehicles exit unpaved areas into paved
roads.
All dirt hauling trucks shall be covered or they shall maintain at least two (2)
feet of freeboard.
10.
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the
appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded
by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee
required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat
Conservation plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
11.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this
stage of the development.
Prior to Recordat, on of the Final Map
12. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director:
A. A copy of the Final Map
B. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans
A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) with the following notes:
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.PC 10/28193 klb 19
(a)
This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar
Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with
the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory
recommendations, Ordinance No. 655.
(b) This project is within a 100 year flood hazard zone.
D. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's)
(a)
CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. The
CC&R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining open
space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all
buildings and all landscaped and open areas including parkways. No
basketball courts shall be allowed in the alleys. No parking shall be
allowed on the shared access driveways. All units shall have operating
garage door openers at all times.
The project shall be consistent with the requirements of the French Valley
Airport when the plan is adopted.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all
mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been
satisfied for this stage of the development.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
13. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director:
A. Construction landscape plans consistent with the following:
(a) City Standards.
(b) The approved Typical Conceptual Landscape Plans.
(c) Automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas.
(d)
Complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from the view of
the public from streets and adjacent property.
(e)
Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots prior to issuance
of the first building permits within each of the phases of the Final Map.
(f)
Change the California Sycamore in the Nicolas Road Conceptual Plans
to London Plane Tree.
B. Wall and fence plans consistent with the following:
(a)
All walls and fences shall be a minimum of six (6) feet measured from
the highest grade or as otherwise specified below.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.PC 10/28/93 klb 20
(b) _-,,
14.
15.
A six foot six inch (6' 6") high decorative block wall or a combination
decorative block wall and berming (measured from the finished pad
elevation) shall be constructed on the rear property lines for lots 1
through 22, 103, 104 and 162, and on the side property lines for lots
1, 22, 103 and 162. These walls shall have a surface density of at
least 3.5 pounds per square foot, and shall have no openings or cracks
(Refer to Preliminary Noise Analysis prepared by Mestre Greve
Associates, August 11, 1993).
(c)
Decorative block shall be required for the side yards for corner' lots and
along the western property line (lots 103 through 121 ).
(d)
Wrought iron, decorative block or wrought iron combination shall be
required to take advantage of views for rear yards along the northerly
property line (lots 121 through 154) and lots 155 through 162 and the
side yard for lot 154.
(e)
Wood fencing shall be used for all side and rear yard fencing when not
restricted by 2, 3 and 4 above.
(f)
The wall along Nicolas Road shall be constructed entirely, including the
footings, within the individual lots and not within the public right-of-
way.
Precise grading plans including all structural setback measurements consistent
with the approved rough grading plans and the approved plotrings.
Elevations, floor plans and colors and materials consistent with the approved
plans.
E. The Model Home Complex Plot Plan (if applicable) which includes the following:
(a) Site Plan with off-street parking
(b) Construction Landscape Plans
(c) Fencing Plans
(d) Building Elevations
A Noise Analysis shall be submitted for review and approval for the interior
spaces within the project. The maximum interior noise level shall be 45 CNEL.
Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision;
however, solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with
Planning Director approval.
The applicant shall demonstrate by a written report that all mitigation measures
identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the
development.
R:\S~STAFFRPT~144PA93,PC 10/28/93 klb 21
Prior to Issuance of Occupancy Permits
16.
If deemed necessary by the Planning Director, the applicant shall provide additional
landscaping to effectively screen various components of the project.
17.
Front yard and slope landscaping and all fencing within individual lots shall be
completed for inspection.
18.
All the Conditions of Approval shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the
Directors of Planning, Public Works, Community Services and Building and Safety.
19.
Zero clearance garage doors with automatic garage door openers shall be provided for
all units.
20.
The wall and the associated landscaping along Nicolas Road shall be installed prior to
issuance of the first occupancy permit within each of the phases of the Final Map that
front Nicolas Road.
21.
The monument signs for the project shall be maintained by the applicant and shall be
removed, if within right-of-way, prior to issuance of the last final release of the project.
22.
The applicant shall demonstrate by a written report that all mitigation measures
identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the
development.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true
meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department
of Public Works.
General Requirements
23.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the Tentative Tract Map all
existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and
drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for
further review and revision.
24.
A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all on-site flat work and
improvements) grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-
of-way.
25.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City
right-of-way.
R:~S\STAFFRPT~144PAS3.PC 10/28/93 klb 22
All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements
contiguous to the site.
27.
Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part
of an existing Assessment District must comply with the recluirements of said section.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
28.
A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and
hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District for approval prior to recordation of the final map or the
issuance of any permit. A permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District is required for work within their Right-of-Way.
29.
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed
and approved by the Department of Public Works. The plan shall comply with the
Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, City Standards, and as additionally required in
these Conditions of Approval.
30.
All lot drainage shall be directed to the driveway and/or the alley by side yard drainage
swales independent of any other lot.
31.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
32.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board.
No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed with
the Regional Water Quality Control Board or the project is shown to be exempt from
that agency.
33.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region;
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District;
Planning Department;
Department of Public Works;
Riverside County Health Department;
Community Services District (TCSD);
General Telephone;
Southern California Edison Company; and
Southern California Gas Company.
34.
A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.PC 10/28193 klb 23
35.
An Erosion Control Plan in accordance with. City Standards, shall be prepared by a
registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval.
36.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
37.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed free condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
38.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District prior
to issuance of any permit. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has
already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
39.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or easements for any off-
site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works at no cost to any agency.
40.
The Developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto
or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of
streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of Ordinance No. 460 will
apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited
for drainage purposes, the Developer shall provide adequate facilities as approved by
the Department of Public Works.
41.
The Developer shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration
of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be
provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing
facilities or by securing a drainage easement.
42.
A Flood Plain Development Permit and Drainage Study shall be submitted to the
Department of Public Works for review and approval. The drainage study shall include,
but not be limited to, the following criteria:
Drainage and flood protection facilities which will protect all structures by
diverting site runoff to streets or approved storm drain facilities as directed by
the Department of Public Works.
Adequate provision shall be made for the acceptance and disposal of surface
drainage entering the property from adjacent areas.
The impact to the site from any flood zone as shown on the FEMA flood hazard
map and any necessary mitigation to protect the site.
D. Identify and mitigate impacts of grading to any adjacent floodway.
R:~S\STAFFRPT~144PA93 .PC 10/28/93 Idb 24
The location of existing and post development 100-year floodplain and
floodway shall be shown on the improvement plan.
43.
The site is in an area identified on the Floo~ Hazard Maps as Flood Zone "A" and is
subject to flooding of undetermined depths. Prior to the approval of any plans, this
project shall comply with Ordinance No. 91-12 of the City of Temecula, and with the
rules and regulations of FEMA for development within Flood Zone "A", which may
include obtaining a letter of map revision from FEMA.
44.
The following storm drain facilities shall be provided along with the facilities as shown
on the Tentative Map. The requirement for the underground facilities is to mitigate the
surface runoff onto Nicolas Road, the potential maintenance of the nuisance runoff
created by this development, and negate the provision of additional drainage facilities
downstream since Assessment District 161 did not accommodate this development's
proposed runoff in sizing the downstream drainage facilities.
Catch basins shall be installed at the intersection of "G" Street and Nicholas
Road to eliminate the cross gutter.
The site shall be designed to minimize the contributory onsite runoff to Nicolas
Road at "A" Street by providing additional catch basins and storm drain pipes
or by redesignin_c the grades near the intersection of Nicolas Road and "A"
Street.
Prior to the Issuance of Encroachment Permits
45.
All conditions of the grading permit and encroachment permit shall be complied with
to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department.
46.
Improvement plans, including but not limited to, streets, parkway trees, street lights,
driveways, drive aisles, parking lot lighting, drainage facilities and paving shall be
prepared by a registered Civil Engineer on 24" x 36" mylar sheets and approved by the
Department of Public Works. Final plans (and profiles on streets) shall show the
location of existing utility facilities and easements as directed by the Department of
Public Works.
47.
The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans to be
submitted to the Department of Public Works:
Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos. 207,207A, and
208.
Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with Ordinance No. 461 and shall be shown on the improvement
plans as directed by the Department of Public Works.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93 .PC 10/28193 Idb 25
48.
49.
50.
51.
5 foot wide concrete sidewalks shall be constructed per City Standard Nos.
400 and 401 specifications.
Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
Minimum centerline radii shall be in accordance with City Standard No. 113 or
as otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
All reverse curves shall include a 100-foot minimum tangent section or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
All street and driveway centerline-intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as
approved by the Department of Public Works.
All units shall be provided with zero clearance garage doors.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through under-sidewalk drains.
All driveways shall be located a minimum of 2 foot from the side property line unless
otherwise provided for with a joint use easement for ingress/egress.
In order for the City to agree to accept and maintain the proposed alleys, they shall be
subject to the following conditions:
·
The alleys shall be concrete paved.
· No utilities shall be installed within the alleys.
· Parking shall not be permitted along the alleys and they shall be signed
accordingly.
· Lights shall be installed on each garage and/or every house.
· The Developer shall file an application with TCSD for inclusion of the alleys
within Service Level 'R' to provide for the maintenance of the alleys.
All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall
be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and
constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable
TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence.
All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground.
R:~.S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.PC 10/28193 Idb
52.
A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or
other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
53.
The stop bar at the southbound Warbler Circle approach shall be positioned five (5)
feet from Nicolas Road curb line.
54. All required fees shall be paid.
Prior to Recordation of Final Map
55. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid.
56.
The Developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement
guaranteeing the construction of the following public/private improvements within 18
months in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the
Department of Public Works.
Street improvements, which may include, but are not limited to: pavement,
curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, traffic
signals and other traffic control devices as appropriate.
B. Storm drain facilities.
C. Landscaping (slopes and parkways).
D. Erosion control and slope protection.
E. Sewer and domestic water systems.
F. Undergrounding of proposed utility distribution lines.
57.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board;
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Department of Public Works;
Riverside County Health Department;
Cable TV Franchise;
Community Services District;
General Telephone;
Southern California Edison Company;
Southern California Gas Company;
Department of Fish and Game; and
Army Corps of Engineers.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.pC 10/28/93 kJb
58.
All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the
public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers, All
dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of
Public Works.
59.
The draft Circulation Element of the proposed General Plan calls for an 18 foot wide
raised landscaped median along Nicolas Road per City Standard No. 100.
Consequently, should Assessment District (AD) 1 61 not construct the median, the
Developer shall be required to construct the median along the property frontage or pay
the fair share cost of the improvements in lieu of construction of the improvements to
provide for the raised landscaped median per City Standard No. 100.
In the event that the Developer constructs the median, it shall accommodate a left turn
pocket into Roripaugh Road. The median shall be continuous at "A" Street to restrict
access to right turn in/out movement if the it is to remain at its currently designed
location. The median shall also be designed to accommodate a 150 foot left turn
pocket into Warbler Circle and "G" Entry Street and "D" Street and Nicolas Road
should the Developer choose to relocate the access to that location. If the median is
not constructed, the Developer shall accommodate the above by striping accordingly.
60.
Sufficient right-of-way along "G" Entry Street shall be dedicated for public use to
provide for a 60 foot full width right-of-way and shall be improved with concrete curb
and gutter located 18 feet on both sides of the centerline and 36 feet of asphalt
concrete pavement, or post bonds for the street improvements, as determined by the
Department of Public Works.
61.
Sufficient right-of-way along "A", "B", "C", and the remainder of "G" Street shall be
dedicated for public use to provide for a 50 foot full width right-of-way including the
standard knuckle, and shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter located 18 feet
on both sides of the centerline and 36 feet of asphalt concrete pavement, or post
bonds for the street improvements, as determined by the Department of Public Works.
62.
Sufficient right-of-way along "D" , "E" , and "F" Streets shall be dedicated for public use
to provide for a 46 foot full width right-of-way and shall be improved with concrete
curb and gutter located 16 feet on both sides of the centerline and 32 feet of asphalt
concrete pavement, or post bonds for the street improvements, as determined by the
Department of Public Works.
63.
Sufficient right-of-way along the Alleys shall be dedicated for public use to provide for
a 20 foot full width right-of-way and the entire width shall be improved with concrete
pavement, or post bonds for the alley improvements, as determined by the Department
of Public Works.
64.
The Developer shall file an application with TCSD for inclusion of the alleys within
Service Level 'R' to provide for the maintenance of the alleys.
65. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.PC 10128193 klb 28
66, ~
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
The Developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property
interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the Developer shall, prior to submittal
of the final map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the
improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section
66462.5. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the Developer of all costs
incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection
with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash
deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the Developer, at the
Developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to
commencement of the appraisal.
The volume of traffic projected at the project access intersections would not be high
enough to meet peak hour signal warrants.
Vehicular access shall be restricted on Nicolas Road and so noted on the Final Map as
approved by the Department of Public Works.
A Signing and Striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
approved by the Department of Public Works for Nicholas Road and shall be included
in the street improvement plans.
Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact the Department of Public Works for
the design requirements.
Bus bays and shelters shall be provided at locations as determined by Riverside Transit
Agency and the Department of Public Works.
The joint use driveway easements shall be shown on the Final Map. No building
permits for units with joint use shall be issued until the Final Map has been recorded.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage
facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the Final Map if they are located within the
land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted
for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site
drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within
drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final
map stating "drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions."
An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the
final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed
with the office of the City Engineer. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the
Planning Department for review and approval. The following information shall be on
the ECS:
A. The delineation of the area within the 100-year floodplain.
B. Special Study Zones.
R:~S~STAFFRPT~144PA93.PC 10128/93 Idb ~-9
75.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
76.
The Developer shall deposit with the Department of Public Works a cash sum as
established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the Developer
choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into
a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of
a building permit.
77.
The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop.
Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements.
78.
A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be prepared by
the Developer and submitted to the Director of Planning, City Engineer, and City
Attorney. The CC&R's shall be signed and acknowledged by all parties having any
record title interest in the property to be developed, shall make the City a party
thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City. The CC&R's shall be reviewed and
approved by the City and recorded. The CC&R's shall be submitted to the following
Engineering conditions:
A. The CC&R's shall be prepared at the Developer's sole cost and expense.
The CC&R's shall be in the form and content approved by the Director of
Planning, City Engineer, and the City Attorney, and shall include such provisions
as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect
the interest of the City and its residents.
The CC&R's shall be recorded concurrent with the Final Map. A recorded copy
shall be provided to the City.
The CC&R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation,
management, use, repair and maintenance of all private areas.
The CC&R's shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated and
maintained so as not to create a public nuisance. '
The CC&R's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition
required by the CC&R's, then the City, after making due demand and giving
reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the Owner's sole
expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&R's or the City
ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure
any such expense not promptly reimbursed.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
79.
A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for
review and approval. The building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer
for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report
addressing compaction and site conditions.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.PC 10/28/93 klb 30
80° ~
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code,
the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading
Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall
be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan.
81.
The Developer shall pay the Public Facilities and Services Mitigation Fee as per the
amended Development Agreement as reviewed and approved by the City.
Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy
82.
All improvements shall be completed and in place per the approved plans, including but
not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, drainage
facilities, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets.
83. All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and striping plan.
84.
The traffic signal at Nicolas Road and Winchester Road shall be installed and
operational per the special provisions and the approved traffic signal plan.
85.
The Developer shall provide "stop" controls at the intersection of local streets with
arterial streets as directed by the Department of Public Works.
86.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersection and adjacent
to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance as directed by the Department of
Public Works.
87.
Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied only as directed by the Department of
Public Works at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform
to Section Nos. 37, 39, and 94 of the State Standard Specifications.
88.
In the event that the required improvements on Nicolas Road along the property
frontage of this development are not completed by AD 161, the Developer shall
construct the required half width improvements per City Standard No. 100 or as
otherwise determined by the Department of Public Works.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
General Requirements:
89.
A Class II Bicycle Lane on Nicolas Road shall be designed and constructed in
conformity with the City's Park and Recreation Master Plan and in concurrence with
the completion of the street improvements.
90.
Construction of the public park site, perimeter landscaping and medians shall
commence pursuant to a pre-job meeting with the developer and the City Maintenance
Superintendent. Failure to comply with the TCSD review and inspection process may
preclude acceptance of these areas into the TCSD maintenance program.
R:~S\STAFFRPT~144PA93 .PC 10/28/93 klb 3 1
91.
The developer, or the developer's successors or assignees, shall maintain the park site,
parkway landscaping and medians until such time as those responsibilities are accepted
by the TCSD.
92.
All parks shall be improved and dedicated to the City free and clear of any liens,
assessment fees, or easements that would preclude the City from utilizing the property
for public park purposes. A policy of title insurance and soils assessment report shall
also be provided with the dedication of the property.
93.
All perimeter walls, interior slopes and open space shall be maintained by the individual
property owners.
Prior to Recordation of the Final Map:
94.
Prior to recordation of the first phase, the developer or his assignee shall enter into an
agreement and post security to improve lot number 163, a three (3) acre site, as a
public park facility, pursuant to City Ordinance No. 460.93 (Quimby). Lot No 163 shall
be identified as a public park site and offered for dedication to the City on the final
map.
95.
Prior to recordation of the final map, the subdivider shall post security and enter into
an agreement to improve the parkway landscaping and landscaped medians within
Nicolas Road right-of-way in conformance with the City of Temecula Landscape
Development Plan Guidelines and Specifications. All proposed slopes, landscaping and
medians intended for dedication to the TCSD shall be identified on the final map as a
proposed TCSD maintenance area.
96.
Landscape construction drawings, consistent with the approved conceptual landscape
plans, for the public park site, parkway landscaping, and medians shall be reviewed
and approved by TCSD staff prior to recordation of the final map.
Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy:
97.
Actual development and dedication of the park to the City shall be completed
prior to issuance of the 34th certificate of occupancy, or within eighteen
months of recordation of the first phase of the final map, whichever cbmes
first.
98.
Prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy, the developer or his assignee shall
submit, in a format as directed by TCSD staff, the most current list of Assessor's
Parcel Numbers assigned to the final project.
OTHER AGENCIES
99.
The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined
in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal dated July 27, 1993, a copy
of which is attached.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.PC 10/28/93 klb 32
100.
101.
102.
103.
The applicant shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in the
Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated September 20, 1993, a copy of
which is attached. If the project lies within an adopted flood control drainage area
pursuant to Section 10.25 of City of Temecula Land Division Ordinance No. 460,
appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the
City prior to issuance of Occupancy Permits.
The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the
County of Riverside Fire Department's letter dated August 3, 1993, a copy of which
is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Eastern Municipal
Water District transmittal dated July 29, 1993, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho California
Water District transmittal dated October 14, 1993, a copy of which is attached.
R:\S~STAFFRPT~144PA93.PC 10/28/93 klb 33
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE · HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
July, 27, 1993
RECEIVED
CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
43 174 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
TEMECULA, CA 92590
ATTN: Saied Naaseh:
RE: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 27827:
AUG O 1993
::)
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A
PORTION OF LOTS 182 AND 183 OF THE TEMECULA LAND AND
WATER COMPANY, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 8, PAGE 359
OF MAPS, SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDS, TOGETHER WITH THOSE
PORTIONS OF HAMILTON AVENUE, BANANA STREET, AND APRICOT
STREET, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF THE RANCHO TEMECULA
AS SHOWN PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK I, PAGE 37 OF PATENTS IN
THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY,
ALL BEING IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
(163 LOTS)
Dear Gentlemen:
The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed Tentative Tract Map No.
27827 and recommends:
A water system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as a proved
by the water cornpan and the Health Department. Permanent prints of ~et plans
of the water system ~s~all be submitted in iriplicate, with a minimum scale not less
than one inch equals 200 feet, along with the original drawing to the City of
Temecula. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, locanon of valves and
fire hydrants' pipe and 'oint specifications, and the size of the main at the junction
of the new s' stem to h~e existing system. The lans shall compl in all res ects
with Div. 5, Fart 1, Cha ter7 of the Califomia i-Fgalth and Safety ~ode, Cre'ffomia
Adminislxative Code, ~tle 11, Chapter 16, and General Order No. 103 of the
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, when applicable..The plans
shall be signed by a registered engineer and water company with the following
certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Tract Map No.
27827 is in accordance with the water system exgansmn plans of the Rancho
California Water District and that the water services, storage, and distribution
system will be adequate to provide water service to such Tract Map". This
certification does not constitute a guarantee that it will supply water to such Tract
Map at an specific quantities, flows or pressures for fire rotection or any other
purpose. ~Fl~s certification shall be si ed by ares onsi~g official of the water
company. The plans must be submitte~nttoe the City o~Temecula's Office to review
at least two weeks prior to the request for the recordation of the final map.
to serve domestic water to each and 1
providing satisfactory financial arrangements are com leted with the subdivider. It
will be necessary for financial axnngements to be ma~; prior to the recordation of
John M. Fanning, Director
4065 County Circle Drive * Riverside, CA 92503. Phone (909) 358-5316 * FAX (909) 358-5017
(Mailing Address - P.O. Box 7600 · Riverside, CA 9251 3-7600)
printed On recycled
City of Temecula Planning Dept.
Page 2
Attn: Saied Naaseh
July 27, 1993
the final map.
This subdivision is within the Eastern Municipal Water District and shall be
connected to the sewers of the District. The sewer system shall be installed
according to lans and s eci~cations as approved by the District, the Ci of
Temecula ang the He~l~ Department. Permanent ' ts of the lans of~ie sewer
system shall be submitted in iri ticate, along with ~rme o~riginal ~w~g, to the City
of Temecula. The prints shall ~ow the intehaal p.~ipe diameter, location of
manholes, complete profiles, pipe and joint s ecifications and the size of the
sewers at the junction of the new system to ~ existin system. A sin e plat
indicatin location of sewer lines and waterlines shall ~e a portion of ~e sewage
plans an~profiles. The plans shall be signed by a registereit engineer and the
sewer distiict with the f6llowing certi~cition: "I certify that the design of the
sewer system in Tract Map No. 27827 is in accordance with the sewer system
expansion plans of the Eastern Municipal Water District and that the waste
disposal s stem is adequate at this time to treat the antici ated wastes from the
pro osed ~arcel Map". The plans must be submitted to ~e City of Temecula's
O~e~e to review at least two weeks prior to the request for the recordation of the
final map.
It will be necessary_ for financial arrangements to be completely finalized prior to
recordation of the final map.
Sincerely(,
Sam Martinez, Environmental Health Specialist IV
SM:dr
(909) 275-8980
KENNETH L EDWARDS
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
,('A oj'. en
(.f'A eSo 145')
q;he District does not normally re.,~cw,..;nd conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not
plan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate Mters or olhar 9ood hazard reports for such cases. District
exxnmentS/reco,,.,,endations for such cases are mxm/ly limited to items of specific interest to the District inducing District Master Drainage Rail
fadlilies, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which cotaid be considered a logical oc.,m~t or extension of a master plan system,
and District Area Drainage Ran fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of s genersi nattie is provided.
The District has not reviewed the proposed project in {letall and the following checked comments do not in any way constitute or imply District
approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard. public health and safety or any other such issue:
I"""'I This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Ran facilities nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed.
~This project involves District Master Ran facilities. The District will ~gpt ownership of such facilities on wri~en request of the City. F&cilities
mus~ be oonstructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required lor District acceptance. Plan check,
.~inspection and edrninistrative fees will be required.
inches or larger '
L
and/or a logical extension of the adopted ~,,Le~r&f:J.~tfF Drainage Ran. The District would consider
ownership of such fadlilies o~ writtan request of the Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and
inspection will be required for Distdct acceptance. Plan Ched~ inspection and administrative fees will be required.
Ehi oo~ni ~lJ' a 6'{' Area Drainage Plan for which drainage
s project is located within the limits of the District's~mm'&~
fees have been adopted; applicable fees should be paid to the R District or C_.jty prior to final approval of the project, or in the case
of a parcel map or subdivision prior 1o recordslion of the final map. Fees to be paid should be st the rate in effect at the time of reco~dation,
or ~ deferred, st the time of issuance of the actual permit.
C-FNFRAI INFrlRt'ATIt'IN
This projed may require a National Pdlutant Discharge Birnination System (NPDES) pemdt from the Sate Watir Resources Control Board.
Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval, should not be given until the City has doteffnined that the project has been granted a
permit or is shown to be exempt.
ff this project invofves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, then the City should require the applicant to
provide all studies, calculations. plans and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require that the applicant
obtain 8 Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, reeordaikm or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map
Revision (LOMR) prior to ocoJpancy.
If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project the City should require the applic&qt to obtain a Section 1601/1603
Agreement from the California Deparlmem of Fish and Game and a C3ean Wstor Act Section 404 permit from the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, or writtan coffespondence frofit these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Cklan Water Act Section
404 Water Quality Certification may be required from the loci California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps
404 permit.
C:
Very truly yours,
FORM: DISTINTX
~JMI4ARRIS
CHIEF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE · PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92570 · (909) 657-3183
'T'f'll
Temecula Planning DeDar'kment
Saied Naaseh
PA93-0144
Tentative Tract 27827
August 3, 1993
With respect to the conditions of approval for the above refer-
enced lanc~ division, tlne Fire Departrr~ent recommends the following
'fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside
County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards:
1. Schedule A fire protectiori. An approve~ standard fire hy-
,:~ran'~'s, (.5"x4"x2 1/2" located one at eacP~ street intersec'!zior~
and spaced no more t. har, 3.'30 feet apart or nc~ portion of lot
" % a ';: ,:-z~ '~ ......." "t'
vrC, n ~ more t. hiir~ 165 ~L. from a ,~.,dran'~2. Minimum fire 'flow
s h a i i b e 1000 G P M f o r 2 h o u r s d u r a t i o n a t 20 P S I .
2 "hr"l .... icant,"'deveio0er shall furnish one copy of tlne water plans
to '~..he Fire De?oartment. for review. Plans shai]. ~e signed be a
i-'-ce~.~= ...,.=, ~=~., c~'.-,.'l .~ engineer, con.~ -. 4 nin(:] a Fire Depar'k~ren'k aO~rovai
· ~i. lc]r"~C~tL.~r'E- b' c'ck. and sha]. ]. EoFmfor~t '{10 hvdrar~t ~ .... Oe ' '-'cation
s ~ a c · n g a n d m i n i m u m 'f i r e f 1 o w. (] n c e p 1 a n s a r e s i c~ n e d ~-y t h e I o c a l
wa~er company, the originals shal I be presente~ to -the l:::'ire
Department 'for signature.
3. Blue dot re'flectors shall be mounted in private streets and
driveways to indicate location of 'fire hydrants. They shall be
mounted 5..n the middle of the street directly in line with fire
h'v' d ran ts.
" The requ'ir-ed water system, includinO fire h~Tdr'ants: shall be
installed and accepted by the appropria'!:e water agency prior to
any combustible building materival being placed on an individual
221 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
3760 12th Street, Riverside, CA 92501
(9(}9) 275-4777 * FAX (909) 369-7451
FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION
PLANNING SECTION
~ INi)IO OFFICE
79-733 Country. Club. Drive, Suite F, Indiu, CA 92201
(619) 863-8886 * FAX (619) 863-7072
pnnttd on recycled pa~tt
5 ?rior ~:o ~'~ ..... retardation o~ th._=., ~inal mac, the, dev~.=.~l,D~3er
~shall deoosit. with the City of Temecuia. a cash sum o'f S400.00
oer ].or/unit. as mitigation for fire Orotect~on ~mpacts. Should
the ~evelooer choose to defer the time of paymer~'~. he/she may
enter into a written a~reement with the County defer:-ing said
............ ~ ~ - ti of ~
~,~.~, ........ o the me issuance of the first building oermi ....
,ql i c!uestions regarding the meaning of conditions sha:L i
ferred to the Planning and Engineering Staff.
RAYMOND H. REGIS
~'-~ ' Fi ,
b,,~e,+ re Oeoartment Planner
L. aura Cabral ,
Fire Safety S!secial is't:
Easter. Municipal Water District
Gt~tr, d Mdndgtr /x~
J. Andrew Schlange
Redwine and Sherrill i,~ m
Dlrtctor O/The A4etropolisan ]r/diet
Distna o/So~h~ ~i/omU ~
~yle F. ~n
Rogers M. ~x
IDE ~
Board o/Directoft
Chester C Gilbert, Presider'~,
Wm. G. Aidridge, Vice Pn
Craig A. Weaver
Marion V, Ashley
Rodget D. Sserns
$,creury
Ma~ C ~7hite .
July 29, 1993
RECEIVED
Arts 'd ............
Saied Naaseh, Case Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43 174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
SUBJECT: Tract 27827 (PA 93-0144)
Dear Mr. Naaseh::
We have reviewed the materials transmitted by your office which describe the subject project.
Our comments are outlined below:
General
It is our understanding the subject project is a proposal to subdivide 22.5 acres located between
Nicolas Rd. and the Santa Gemdis Creek at the northwest comer of the intersection of Nicolas
and North General Kearney Rds., into 163 single family residential lots with alleys and a 3.0
acre park site.
The subject project is located within the District' s sanitary sewer service area. However, it must
be understood the available service capabilities of the District's systems are continuilly changing
due to the occurrence of development within the District and programs of systems improvement.
As such, the provision of service will be based on the detailed plan of service requirements, the
timing of the subject project, the status of the District's permit to operate, and the service
agreement between the District and the developer of the subject project.
The developer must arrange for the preparation of a detailed plan of service. The detailed plan
of service will indicate the location(s) and size(s) of system improvements to be made by the
developer (or others), and which are considered necessary in order to provide adequate levels
of service. To arrange for the preparation of a plan of service, the developer should submit
information describing the subject project to the District's Customer Service Department, (909)
925-7676, extension 409, as follows:
Mail To: Post Office Box 8300 · SanJacinto, California 92581-8300 · Telephone (909) 925-7676 · Fax (909) 929-0257
Main Office: 2045 S. SanJar. into Avenue, San Jadnto ° Customer Service/Engineering Annex: 440 E. Oakland Avenue, Hernet, CA
Saied Naaseh
City of Temecula
Tract 27827
July 29, 1993
Page 2
Written request for a "plan of service".
Minimum $400.00 deposit (larger deposits may be required for extensive
development projects or projects located in "difficult to serve" geographic areas).
Plans/maps describing the exact location and nature of the subject project.
Especially helpful materials include grading plans and phasing plans.
Sanitary Sewer
The subject project is considered tributary to the District's Temecula Valley Regional Water
Reclamation Facility (TVR~,VRF).
The nearest existing TVRWRF system sanitary sewer facilities to the subject project are as
follows:
15-inch diameter gravity-flow sewer aligned along Nicolas Rd. between Roripaugh and
North General Kearney Rds.
Other Issues
The District requires that onsite sewers be located within the proposed public roadways and not
alleyways.
Should you have any questions regarding these comments, please feel free to contact this office
at (909) 925-7676, extension 468.
Very truly yours,
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
)avid G~ Crosley
Senior Engineer-Customer Service Department
DGC/clz
AB 93-835
(wp-ntwk-TR27827.cLz)
:Thursday October 14, 199:~ ~:iOpm -- From '71/,69/,9175, -- Page
~ BY:~ ;10-14-93; 1B:02
9096946477;# 2/3
October 14, 1993
Mr. SaiedNus~
City of Tcmc~da
Planning Deparunn~t
43174 Business Pas-k Drive
Tem~da, CA 92590-3606
SlIBIECf: Tra. t No. 27827
Dcsr Mr. Nass~h:
PinL~ be advised lhsl the above-mfero,--,-d property is located within the
boundmies of thc Rnncho Califomh W. hT_ District (RCWD/D~). Water
grvicc, Ihu--d'o,e, would be available tq~on complction of financial artanll~ts
(inc]udin2 the ~cn of all in-lract and off-site facilities) between RCWD
and the pwpeny owner.
above willfin Assessment Districl NiL 161 (AD=I61). The following information
is int, m,le~l Io explnln the Distrlct's po-~on in providing water service to this area.
The future Of W'dter scrvicc within A!)-I61 is dcpentl~t upon thc property owners
and the County of Riveuidc approving .~q~plemcntnl financing of water facilities
to service the properties within RCWD boundaries.
The District hs received several requests from developers in this area for RCWD
to review the current water service si-tuation to dctcrmine if the existing water
systcm can suppofi additional development prior to le conslruetion of addilional
watct supply facilities. Bascd upon an additional hydraulic analysis performed by
Tvans-Paci~c Engineering Corporation and acAual ~cId fire flow tcsts; the existing
system caa suppo~ an ndditional m-ximum daily flow of 400 gpm. This flow
cquaZ~ to either 380 residual housing units or 115 acres of conmsen.-ial
development or a combination ofbeth. ~ arc some iimitmions to thc inca tlmt
the exi.~ing syslem can serve; residential deve!~t is limited to areas undn' le
1.150-foot elevation nnd comme~ial development is !imiled to properties nlong
~ Wincheslet Rond corridor at elevations under 1,125 feet. Under these
conditions, tc Dislrict can meet the residc~tinl thily ckmands including a fire
flow of 1,000 ~ and the conunereial daily demands including a mnximum fire
flow of 2,500 gpm.
RCWD will require I!ust nil residential tacit= laterals be 1'~ ineileS in diameter nnd
thnt all residences instnll n pressure tcgulal~r for future conversion to the 1380
Pressurc Zone.
· lu'Ml tlism a,asd - IN.M. OIr.~.k Oll? .~ Tmmt'ulm. t/*J~160.1~ll · tglBIf6'/6411'l * J*AXOO~J)dTfl4~la
!Thursday October 14, 199:$ 2:lOpm -- From '7146949175' -- Page ~1
SENT-~Y:~ ;10-14-B~; 13:03;
9096946477
City"~fTemecula
PlanninE Depa~
October 14, 1993
Pagc Two
The District will accept meter applications on a fust-comdfixst-serml basis. Applicants must meet the
flow and elevation conditions stated above. M~ter al~iir. ation fees must ~ paid in full 'dr the current
rate at the time o£ appian. If fi~-s should inermse prior to installation of the wnt~ metc~ the
· developer will have 90 days to have the metins instnll~ or they will be liable to 'pay the incTr, i,se in
' npplie~ion fees.
For those properties Ihnl request service after the available eap~ty is dedicated or if tlgy do not mcct
the elevation conditions stated above, the construction of the implenu~iing fm~il lties identi~ for AD-
16l will bc required prior to installation of the mete, ted scrvice. Those implementing facilities m'e listed
below:
I. A ~4-inch water main, patalld to Winchester Rt~t, f~om ~-t5 io ~~a Road;
A 1380 Pressme Zone pump ~lation near the intersection of Margarita Rind and Winchntcr
Road;
A water main in l~rim P~ad that is 30 inchcs in diamelcv from the pmnp station to Rustic
Glen Drive, 30 inches to Date ~ and 30 inches along Date Strcct to Winchester Road;
A 24--inch watcrline from rite intevatx~n of Margarila Road and Wincbc~r Road to North
General Kenmy Ro~d;
5. A connection to the 1380 Pres~mre Zone nt North General Kearny Road and Nieolas Road.
As ~ abovc, it may be nec_t,~-~ry For the developer Io upgr-xlc the existing water system to provid~
sufficient prcsettre for domestic nnd fire Ftx}~jon imrpos~. It my also be nccessat7 for lhe developer
to install off-site facilities to ant~ the demands of this property. How~vcr, this does not constitute a
gt~antee that RCNVD will supply water to ~ parcel at amy slz~fic quantity, flow, or Tn-essure for fire
protection or for nny other purpose. Water availabilily would be contingent upon the property owner
sit>ruing an Agency Agreement which :t~igns water management righL% if any, to RCV/D.
you should have ~my qt~stions, plmse contact us.
Sincerely,
RANClIO CALH:ORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
m:sD :ahIOIF26Z
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
INITIAL STUDY
R:%S\STAFFRP'T~144PAS3,PC 10/28/93 klb 34
City of Temecula
"lanning Department
Initial Environmental Study
I. BACKGROUND INFORMA~ON
1. Name of Project:
Roripaugh Estates
2. Case Numbers:
Planning Application No. PA93-0144 and PA93-0145
Location of Project:
Located on the North-west comer of Nicolas Road and North General
Kearny Road
Description of Project:
A Request for Approval of Amendment No. 2 to Specific Plan No.
164 to Change the Zoning for Planning Areas 7 ( 22.5 Acres) and 8
( 10.1 Acres) from Very High Density Residential (20 Dwelling
Units Per Acre) to High Density Residential (12 Dwelling Units Per
Acre), and Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 27827, a 163 lot
subdivision within Planning Area No. 7.
5. Date of Environmental
Assessment:
September 22, 1993
6. Name of Proponent:
Roripaugh Ranch Inc.
,
Address and Phone
Number of Proponent:
P.O. Box 2
Temecula, CA 92590
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations to all the answers are provided in Section III)
I. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
YeS
M{lybe No
a,
Unstable earth conditions or in changes geologic substructures?
X
b,
Disruptions, displacements, compaction, or over covering
of the soil?
C,
Change in topography or Found surface relief features?
X
The destruction, covering or modification of any unique
geologic or physical features?
X
Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on
or off the site?
X
f,
Changes in siltation, deposition or erosion?
X
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.PC 10/28/93 klb 35
g. The modification of any wash, channel, creek, river or lake?
h. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as
earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, liquefaction, ground
failure, or similar hazards?
i. Any development within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone?
Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
c. Alteration of air movement, temperature, or moisture or any
change in climate,~ whether locally or regionally?
Water. Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements, in either marine or fresh waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and
amount of surface runoff?.
c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body?
e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not limited to, temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?
g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct
additions, withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer
by cuts or excavations?
h. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public
water supplies?
i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such
as flooding?
X
X
Maybe
..X
×
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:\S\STAFFRF'r~144PA93.PC 10/28/93 klb 36
Yes Maybe N__o
,
Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native
species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and
aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or
endangered species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
d. Reduction in the acreage of any agricultural crop?
Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of
animals (animals includes all land animals, birds, reptiles, fish,
amphibians, shellfish, benthic organisms, and/or insects)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or
endangered species of animals?
c. The introduction of new wildlife species into an area?
d. A barrier to the migration or movement of animals?
e. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?
Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
c. Exposure of people to severe vibrations?
Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce or result in light or glare?
Land Use. Will the proposal result in:
a. Alteration of the present land use of an area?
b. Alteration to the future planned land use of an area as described
in a community or general plan?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:\S\STAFFRP'r%144PA93.PC 10/28/93 klb 37
YeS Maybe N,_qo
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. An increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?
b. The depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource?
10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal result in:
a. A risk of an explosion or the release of any hazardous substances
in the event of an accident or upset conditions (hazardous
substances includes, but is not limited to, pesticides, chemicals,
oil or radiation)?
b. The use, storage, transport or disposal of any hazardous or toxic
materials (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals,
or radiation)?
c. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an
emergency evacuation plan?
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density,
or growth rate of the human population of an area?
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand
for additional housing?
13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking?
c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems, including
public transportation?
d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of
people and/or goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of
the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.PC 10/28/93 klb 38
YeS
Maybe
b. Police protection? _ _
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? _ _
f. Other governmental services: ___ __
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial mounts of fuel or energy? __ __
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources or energy,
or require the development of new sources of energy? _ _
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or
substantial alterations to any of the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas? __ __
b. Communications systems? __ __
c. Water systems? __ __
d. Sanitary sewer systems or septic tanks? __ __
e. Storm water drainage systems? __ __
f. Solid waste disposal systems? __ __
g. Will the proposal result in a disjointed or inefficient pattern of
utility delivery system improvements for any of the above? __ __
17. Hmnan Health. Will the proposal result in:
a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? __ __
b. The exposure of people to potential health hazards, including
the exposure of sensitive receptors (such as hospitals and
schools) to toxic pollutant emissions? __ __
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in:
a. The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? __ __
b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? __ __
No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:\S\STAFFRPT\144PA93.PC 10/28/93 klb 39
19.
20.
c. Detrimental visual impacts on the surrounding area?
Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or
quantity of existing recreational resources or opportunities.'?
Cultural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. The alteration or destruction of any paleontologic, prehistoric,
archaeological or historic site?
b. Adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic
building, structure, or object?
c. Any potential to cause a physical change which would affect
unique ethnic cultural values?
d. Restrictions to existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
Yes Maybe
X
N__q
X
X
X
X
X
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93 .PC 10/28/93 klb
HI. DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
~,:arth
1 .a.d.
No. The project will not result in unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures,
destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features since the site has
already been Faded and no unique features exist on site. No impacts are anticipated.
1.b.
Yes. The project will cause disruptions, displacements, compaction, or overcovering of soil,
however, the impacts are considered insignificant since the site has already-been graded and
additional grading will be for foundation, street improvements and drainage.
1 .c.g.
No. The project will not result in change in topography or ground surface relief features, or
modification of any wash, channel, creek, river or lake since the project site has already been
graded. The Santa Gertrudis Creek will be developed by Assessment District 161 prior to
development of this site. The project will have no significant impacts.
1 .e.f.
Yes. The project will result in an increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the
site and changes in siltation, deposition or erosion. These impacts are mainly short term as a result
of construction. The City will require the use of appropriate best management practices to reduce
and mitigate onsite erosion and offsite deposition. Long-term erosion and deposition from the
project site is expected to decrease as a result of the project because of the required paving and
landscaping when the site is ultimately developed. No significant impacts are anticipated.
No. The project will not result in exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as
earthquakes, and development near an Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zone, since the General Plan
EIR does not identify the site in being in any of these areas. However, the site is within a
liquefaction zone as identified in the General Plan EIR. The Geotechnical Investigation prepared
by Geocon, Inc., Revised August 1993, identifies the site as having a low potential for liquefaction
since the ground water is approximately 47 feet below the existing ground level and the density of
the alluvium left in place is generally dense and increases with depth. Therefore, no significant
impacts are anticipated, if the recommendations included in the Geotechnical report for grading
operation are implemented.
Air
Yes. The construction of the site will ultimately result in the local deterioration of air quality. It
will ultimately result in some short-term construction related increases in air emissions and
particulate matter when the site is developed; however, these impacts are not considered significant,
since dust control measure mitigation measures such as watering the active areas at least twice
daily, applying non-toxic soil stabilizers to all unpaved roads in grading and construction areas
according to the manufacturer's specifications, installing wheel washers where vehicles enter and
exit unpaved roads onto paved roads and covering all dirt hauling trucks or maintain at least two
(2) feet of freeboard. In addition, upon development of the site, some long-term air pollutant
emissions from increased automobile usage could occur; however, this impact is not anticipated to
be significant since the number of dwelling units proposed in the project (162) does not exceed the
166 unit threshold set by AQMD.
R:\S%STAFFRPT%14.4PA93.PC 10/28/93 klb 41
2 .b.c. ._,
No. The project will not cream objectionable odors or cause timration of air movement,
temperature or moisture or any change in climate, whether locally or regionally because of the
nature and location of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated.
Water
3.a.c.d.
e.f.g.h.
i.
No. The project will not cause changes in currents or the course or direction of water movements,
in either marine or fresh waters, alterations to the course or flow of flood waters, change in the
mount of surface water in any waterbody, discharge into surface waters or in any alterations of
surface water quality, alteration of the direction or rate of flow of Found waters, change in the
quantity of ground waters, reduction in the mount of water otherwise available for public water
supplies, or exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding because of
location and size of this project. The site has already been graded and is adjacent to Santa
Gemdis Creek which will be developed by Assessment District 161. No significant impacts are
anticipated.
3.b.
Yes. This project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and mount
of surface runoff since impervious surfaces will be created when it is ultimately developed. This
impact is not anticipated to be significant since the storm water is directed to improved drainage
facilities.
Plant Life
4.a.b.d.
No. This project will not change the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plant,
reduce the numbers of any unique, rare, ~threatened or endangered species of plants or reduce the
acreage of any agricultural crop since the site has already been graded. No significant impacts are
anticipated.
4.c.
Maybe. This project may introduce new species of plants; however, when the project is ultimately
developed, as new landscaping will be introduced as a part of the new development. No significant
impacts are anticipated.
Animal Life
5.a.
No. The project will not cause a change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of
animals, since the site has previously been completely graded and no discernible animal
communities or species reside on the site. No significant impacts are anticipated.
5.b.c.
d.e.
No. The project will not cause a reduction in numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or
endangered species of animals, introduction of new wildlife species into the area, a barrier to the
migration or movement of animals or deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat since the site
is already graded and is located in an urban area. Applicable Stephem' Kangaroo rat fees will be
paid, since the project is within the fee area. No significant impacts are anticipated.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PAS3.PC 10/28/93 klb 42
Noise
a.
Yes. The project will increase the existing noise levels. However, when the site is ultimately
developed, short term increases will be associated with the grading and construction of the site
which will be mitigated through restrictions in the hours of construction activities. Long term
project impacts will be associated with the increased traffic on site and on Nicolas Road. The
Noise study prepared for this project (Mestre Greve Associates, August 11, 1993) identifies
significant exterior noise impacts (over 65 CNEL) that can be mitigated to insignificant levels
(under 65 CNEL) by construction of a six foot six inches (6'6") high wall along the Nicholas Road,
side yard of lots 22 and 1, and rear yards of lots 103, 104 and 162. Furthermore, the interior
noise levels were analyzed. and determined to be significant ( 45 CNEL and above). The second
floor building surfaces in the project will be exposed to a maximum of 72 CNEL, and will
therefore require at least 27 dB noise reduction in order to meet the interior noise level standard.
Detailed engineering calculations are needed for building attenuation requirements greater than 20
dB. Specific mitigation measures will be determined after the precise grading plans and the
construction plans are prepared. The noise levels need to be reduced to 45 CNEL in order to
reduce the impacts to insignificant levels. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of the
approval of this project due to the mitigation measures outlined in the Noise Study prepared by
Mestre Greve Associates.
6.b.c.
No. The project will not expose people to severe noise or vibrations because of the residential
nature of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated.
l,ight and Glare
Maybe. The project may cause an increase in light and glare. However, since the project will be
conditioned to comply with the requirements of Ordinance 655, California Institute of Technology,
Palomar Observatory no significant impacts are anticipated.
Land Use
8.a.
Yes. The project will cause an alteration of the present land use of the area since when the site is
ultimately developed it will change it from vacant to residential which is consistent with the General
Plan designation of Medium Density Residential. This change is not anticipated to have a
significant impact since the area is mostly developed with residential uses and the future use of this
site will be consistent with the zoning and General Plan land use designation of the area.
8.b.
No. The proposed project will not cause alteration to the future planned land use of this area, when
ultimately developed, as described in the draft General Plan which designates the site as Medium
Density Residential. Since this project is consistent with the draft General Plan, no significant
impacts are anticipated.
Natural Resources
9.a.b.
Yes. The project will result in an increase in the rate of use of any natural resources and depletion
of any nonrenewable natural resources when the site is ultimately developed, since it will use
aggregate materials for construction and petroleum for construction and use. However, since these
materials are commercially available, no significant impacts are anticipated.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.PC 10/28/93 klb 43
Risk of Upset
lO.a.b.
No. The project will not result in a risk of explosion and/or, the release of hazardous substances,
when the site is ultimately developed, since hazardous substances will not be stored on site.
Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated.
lO.c.
No. The project will not result in any interference with an emergency response plan when the site
is ultimately developed, since proper circulation has been provided on site and adequate access has
been provided to publicly maintained sweets. As a result, no significant impacts are 'anticipated
from this project.
Pop~a~on
11.
Maybe. This project is a residential development and due to its residential nature there may be
alterations to the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of this area.
However, no significant impacts are anticipated due to the small size of the project.
Housing
12.
No. The project will not affect existing housing and create a demand fox' new housing when the
site is ultimately developed because of the residential nature of the project with no potential for new
employment. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated.
Transportation/Circulation
13.a.f.
Yes. The project will generate approximately peak 1609 daily trips, increase traffic hazards to
motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians when the site is ultimately developed. However, the
number of trips generated are not significant since the project abuts Nicholas Road and Winchester
Road which will be developed by the Assessment District 161. Furthermore, the number of access
points is restricted for efficient flow of traffic. All projects increase traffic hazards; however, this
project and previous projects have been conditioned to reduce these hazards to an insignificant level
(i.e. restricted access, traffic lights). Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated.
13.b.c.d.
e.
No. The project will not create additional demand on parking, cause a substafitial impact on
existing transportation systems, alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people
and/or goods and alteration to waterborne, rail or air traffic because of the residential nature and
location of the site. No significant impacts are anticipated.
Public Services
14.a.b.c.
d.e.f.
No. The project will not have a substantial impact on fire protection, police protection, schools,
parks and other governmental services since these services are already available for the project
area. No significant impacts are anticipated.
R:\S\STAFFRPT%144PA93 .PC 10/28193 klb A, A,
,- E~nergy
15.a.b.
No. The project will not result in substantial use of fuel or energy when the site is ultimately
developed. It will not result in substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources of energy because of the small scale of the project and the
commercial availability of these resources. No significant impacts are anticipated.
Utilities
16.a.b.c.
d.e.f.g.
No. The project will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to any of the
following: power or natural gas, communication systems, water systems, sanitary sewer systems,
storm water drainage systems, solid waste disposal systems and will not result in a disjointed or
inefficient pattern of utility delivery system improvements for any of the above because of the
project location and its proximity to the utilities and the availability of these utilities. No significant
impacts are anticipated.
Human Health
17.a.
No. The project will not create potential health hazards when the site is ultimately developed
because of the residential nature of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated.
No. The project will not expose people to potential health hazards, including the exposure of
sensitive receptors such as hospitals and schools to toxic pollutant emissions because of the nature
and location of the project which is not in close proximity to these sensitive receptors. No
significant impacts are anticipated.
Aesthetics
18.a.b.c.
No. The project will not result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public,
the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view, or in a detrimental visual impact
on the surrounding area, when the site is ultimately developed, because of the nature and location
of the project and the fact that the elevations of the buildings will be consistent with the existing
buildings in the area. No significant impacts are anticipated.
Recreation
19.
Yes. The project will result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational
resources or opportunities since the project is proposing a public park. This impact is considered
positive and no significant impacts are anticipated.
R:\SXSTAFFRP'r%144PAS3.PC 10/28/93 klb 45
Cultural Resources
20.a.b.c.
d.
No. The project will not result in alteration or destruction of any paleontologic, prehistoric,
archeological or historic site, adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic
building, structure or object, any potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values, or restrictions to existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact
area since the project site has already been graded. No significant impacts are anticipated.
R:\S\STAFFRPT%144PA$3.pC 10/28/93 Idb
I~IV. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGN~ICANCE
Does the project have the potential to either: degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish, wildlife or bird species, cause a fish,
wildlife or bird population to drop below self sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant, bird or animal
species, or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
Y~
Maybe
N_.qo
Does the project have the potential to achieve sben
term, to the disadvantage of long term, environmental
goals? (A short term impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long term impacts will endure well into the
future.)
X
Does the project have impacts which are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project's
impact on two or more separate resources may be
relatively small, but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment is significant.)
X
Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
V. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME "DE MINIMUS" IMPACT FINDINGS
Does the project have the potential to cause any adverse effect,
either individually or cumulatively, on fish and wildlife resources?
Wildlife is defined as "all wild animals, birds, plants, fish,
amphibians, and related ecological communities, including the
habitat upon which the wildlife depends on for it's continued
viability" (Section 711.2, Fish and Game Code).
Yes
x
NO
R:\S%STAFFRPT%144PA93.PC 10/28/93 klb 47
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ----~,
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I fred that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect
on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case
because the Mitigation Measures described on the attached-sheets and
in the Conditions of Approval that have been added to the project will
mitigate any potentially significant impacts to a level of insignificance,
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
X
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Prepared by:
Signature
Saied Naaseh. Associate Planner
Name and Title
September 22. 1993
Date
R:\S\STAFFRPT\144PA93 .PC 10~28~93 klb 48
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
TRAFFIC STUDY SUMMARY
R:\S\STAFFRPT%144PA93,PC 10/28193 klb 49
Focused Traffic Study
Wilbur Smith Associates
I-INTRODUCTIONANDSUMMARy
A, Purpose of Report and Study Objectives
The primary purpose of the City's focused traffic analysis is to respond to the following
questions:
What is the percentage of impact to intersections within the study area by the proposed
project?
· If signals are requ/rect, what is the project's fair share contribution?
Based on a more detailed discussion of traffic issues related to the Roripaugh Residential
Property site, the following specific study objectives were identified:
1) A review of existing roadway and traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site;
2)
Identification of the probable traffic generation associated with the current residential land
use density (currently proposed density is lower than that the density currently approved
for the Roripaugh Residential Property site;
3) A review 'of anticipated site-related traffic impacts (increases) at key nearby intersections
based on existing background traffic volumes;
4) A review of the proposed site access street intersections on Nicolas Road;
5) A review of the site layout in terms of general on-site circulation; and
6) A review of cumulative development traffic conditions without and with the project.
B. Executive Summary
This section presents an overview of the focused traffic analysis findings, conclusions, and
recommendations for mitigating anticipated traffic impacts related to the Roripaugh Residential
project.
Roripaugh Residential Property 1 City of Temecula
Focused Traffic Study Wilbur Smith Associates
Site Location and Studv Area - The site is located on the north side of Nicolas Road,
generally between Roripaugh Road and North General Kenroy Road (see Figure 1). Access
to and from the site would be served by Nicolas Road. Nicolas Road is curmn~y a two-lane
roadway between Winchester Road and Roripaugh Road. Between Roripaugh Road and
General Kenroy Road, Nicolas Road has been improved to its ultimate half fight-of way cross-
section on the south side (eastbound). The north side (westbound direction) portion of this
seEmeat only provides for one travel.lane. The improvement of the north side of this segment
would be accomplished as pan of the Assessment District 161 (A.D. 161) Nicholas Road
improvements. Winchester Road is currently widened to its designated six-lane Urban Arterial
classification from 1-15 to Margarita Roa& Northeast of Margarita Road, Winchester Road
.provides only two travel lanes.
Development Description - The project development proposal consists of 162 single-family
residential dwelling units and a three-acre neighborhood park located on an approximately 22
acres.
Prineivle Findings - Key findings of the focused traffic analysis are as follows:
· Existin.~ peak-hour traffic vob~rn,es at the intersection of Winchester Roacl/Nicolas Road
warrant signalization of the intersection-
The Nicolas Road widening/Santa Gemdis Creek Flood Control project is being funded
by A.D.161 and should be underway within the next three months. This project would
improve NiColas Road to its ultimate Arterial cross-section from Winchester Road to Just
east of General Keamy Road.
The currently proposed project reflects a reduction in the already approved residential
density for the site. This reduction in density would result in an approximate 38 to 40
percent reduction in the potential project trip generation.
Projected 1994 traffic conditions with the project would provide peak-hour service levels
of "C" or better at the unsignalized Nicolas Road intersections fomed by Roripaugh Roach
West Project Access, and Warbler Circle.
Projected Cumulative Development scenario traffic conditions with and without the project
would be identical except for those movements Specifically"related direct project access.
Traffic movements projected to operated at service level "E" or worse under this scenario
either do not involve project traffic movements or affect an insignificant number of project
vehicles.
· Assuming signalization of the Winchester Road/Nicolas Road intersection peak-hour
Roripaugh Residential Property
City of Temecula
Focused Traffic Study
Wilbur Smith Associates
service levels would be "B" or better for the 1994 With Project scenario and "D" or better
for the Cumulative Development With Project scenario.
· The volume of traffic projected at the project access intersections would not be high
enough to meet peak hour signal warrants.
· Proposed access spacing along Nicolas Road would be less than the ideal spacing, but is
not anticipated to significantly impact traffic operation on Nicolas Road.
· The ~eometry of Nicolas Road at Warbler Circle is anticipated to cause si~ht distance
Noblems unless additional sight obsm~cti~- .~etback re0ulrements are imvosed.
· Proposed on-site circulation provisions are determined to be adequate for the project
Recommendations - WSA has developed the following recommendations based on the
findings of the focused traffic analysis:
· Accept the proposed lower residential density to minimiTe project lrafaeic generation.
· Provide approximately 150 feet of vehicle storage for eastbound left turn movements into
the project site at the West Project Access.
· Provide approximately 100 feet of vehicle storage for eastbound left turn movements into
the project site at the Warbler Circle access.
Roripaugh Residential Property -~ City.of Temecuie
Focused Traffic Study
IlI, AREA CONDITIONS
Wilbur Smith Associates
This section defines the study area, describes existing land use, addresses the t~ransportation
network and current traffic conditions.
A. Study Area Defined
Given the location of the site and the likely distribution'of project traffic to and from the east-
and west on Nicholas Road, a study area was initially defined (through discussions with Public
Works Depa~uaent staff) to include the Nicholas Road corridor segment from Winchester Road
to North General Kearny Road. Key traffic issues associated with the Roripaugh Residential
Developmen~ are focused on the mediate access intersections formed by the proposed project
access drives and the existing intersections along Nicholas Road within the study area.
B. Study Area Land Use
Land use within the study area is primarily residential. Existing residential development is
comprised of Koripaugh Estates and Meadowview to the south and some partially developed
residential subdivisions to the northeast along North General Kearny Road. Anticipated area
development is provided in both graphic and tabular form in Appendix B. The majority of the
already approved development is residential in nature. However a number of the larger
approved specific plan projects include non-residential uses. In the immediate vicinity of the
site, approved non-residential uses include the Roripaugh Village Commercial Center and the
Rancho Temecula Towne Centre.
C. Site Access
The existing roadway system serving the project area is depicted in Figure 1. Access to and
from the site would be provided by Nicholas Road. Winchester Road is currently a two lane
roadway north of Margarita Road. The planned widening of Winchester Road to six lanes has
been designed, and cons'm~ction will commence once A.D. 161 has sold the next series of
bonds. If the new bond series is sold within the next six months the pDnned widening could
be completed in approximately two years. Nicholas Road has been widened from two lanes
to three lanes between Roripaugh Road and North General Kearny Road; the eastbound
Roripaugh Residential Property 6 City of Temeeula
Focused Traffic Study
Wilbur Smith Associates
.~_~direction now has two lanes. Between Roripaugh Road and Winchester Road there are two
avel lanes on Nicholas Road. The widening of Nicholas Road to four lanes, within the study
area, will be initiated by A.D. 161 in July of 1993 this year (as part of a Santa Gertrudis Creek
flood conlzol project) and would be completed by the fast quarter of 1994.
The future circulation system is currently defined by the Draft General Plan Circulation
Element Map. A copy of the Draft Circulation Element Map is provided in Appendix C. The
Draft General Plan Circulation Element identifies Nicholas Road as a four-lane Arterial. Other
,key area roadways identified in the Draft Circulation Element include: Winchester Road (six-
lane Urban Arterial northeast of Ynez Road); Margarita Road (four-lane Arterial); and Murrieta
Hot Springs Road (six-lane Urban Arttrial in the vicinity of Winchester Road).
D. Traffic Volumes and Conditions
Morning and evening peak hour traffic counts are depicted in Figure 2. The counts at
Roripaugh Road/Nicholas Road, Warbler Circle/Nicholas Road, and North General Keamy
Road/Nicholas Road were taken on May 20, 21, & 22, 1993 respectively. The traffic counts
at Winchester Road/Nicholas Road were provided by the City of Temecula Public Works
DepaxUnent and were conducted on February 2, 1993. The traffic counts are presented in
Appendix D.
!ae existing traffic controls within the study area are limited to stop signs, and are depicted
in Figure 1.
The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) unsignalized analysis was used to evaluate the
intersections of Winchester Road/Nicholas Road, Roripaugh Road/Nicholas Road, and Warbler
Circle/Nicholas Road. The intersection of North General Keamy/Nicholas Road was not
analyzed because project impacts at the intersection approaches do not exceed the 5 percent
project impact threshold, (see Section IV A. Site Traffic). The results of the HCM analyses
of existing conditions are presented in Table 1. All movements at the intersections of
Roripaugh Road/Nicholas Road and Warbler Circle/Nicholas Road were found to be 'operating
at level of service (LOS) B or better. Two movements, both left-turning movements, at
Winchester Road/Nicholas Road operate at a level of service worse than LOS C. The HCM
worksheets are provided in Appendix E. . ,'7'At
A signal is proSrammed to be installed at the Winchester Road/Nicholas Road n at
anal ed further to
the time that Winchester Road is widened, however the intersection was ~
determine whether a signal is warranted based on existing conditions. ysis was
accomplished through the use of the planning level Peak Hour Volume Warrant worksheet in
the California Depa~nent of Trans~om~on Traffic Manual. The analysis found that a signal
is warranted today based on existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes. The graph used
Roripaugh Residential Property 7 Cit7 of Temecuia
Table 1
Levels of Service For Critical Unsignalized Intersections
Existing Traffic Conditions Scenario
Roripaugh. Residential Development
intersection
Nicholas Rd. &
Winchester Rd.
Nicholas Rd. &
Roripaugh Rd.
Nicholas Rd. &
Warbler Circle
Movement
Major ,t
Street
Minor
Street
WB Left
WB Right
WB Left
AM Peak Hour
Affected
EB Left
WB Left
PM Peak. Hour
Approx.
LOS
86 A 1 25
120 E 81
172 A 89
18
21
14
0
6
7
0
4
1
0
1
4 A
NB Left 31 A
NB Right 14 A
t
0 ~--
3 ~A
NB Left 12 A
NB Through 0 --
NB Right 7 A
SB Left 2 A
SB Through 0 ---
SB Right 1 ~ A
D
F
A
A
B
A
Focused Tr.~c Study
Wilbur Smith Associates
~ 'n ~hc analysis is prcscnted in Appendix E.
E. Planned Signal Locations
The only new signal which is currently planned at any of the major intersections in the
immediate Stlldy area will be located at the intersection of Nicholas Road and V~rmchcstcr
Koad. The ncw signal is included in the City's Five Year Capital Improvcmcnt Program. It
should bc noted that a portion of the signal funding has already bccn tr,m-~fcrrcd from Rivcrsidc
County Signal Modification Fees to the City of Tcmccula.
Roripaugh Residendst Property S City of Temecuta
Focused Traffic Study
Wilbur Smith Associi~es
V. FOCUSED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
The focused traffic analyses performed for Roripaugh Residential Development concentrates
on responding to the key traffic issues raised by City staff. Responding to these issues
required the following analysis W be performed:
· A review of anticipated site-related traffic impacts (increases) at key nearby intersections
based on projected 1994 and Cumulative Development scenario background traffic
volumes;
· A review of the proposed s~te access street intersections .on Nicolas Road;
· A review of the site layout in terms of general on-site circulation; and
· A review of cumulative development traffic conditions without and with the project
The following sections present a discussion of the issues, their analysis and the analysis
findings.
A. Off-Site Traffic Impacts for 1994 Traffic Projections
HCM Unsignalized Intersection analyses were performed at the intersections with approaches
experiencing traffic increases of five percent or more in existing traffic due to the project. The
results of the HCM unsignalized intersection analysis are summarized in Table 5. The analysis
results indicate that all movements at the intersections of Roripau~h Road/Nicholas. Road, West
Project Access/Nicholas Road, and Warbler Circle/Nicholas Road would operate at Level of
Service (LOS) C or better during the peak-hour periods both "without" and "with" the project.
Two movements, the southbound and westbound left-rum movements at Winchester Road/
Nicholas Road are, however, expected to operate at Levels of Service E and F, respectively
duzing peak traffic periods. As mentioned earlier, signal warrant an~ysis performed for
existing traffic conditions found that a signal is currently necessary at this intersection. When
si~nalization is assumed at the Winchester Road/Nicolas Road intersection along with only
rn~nor intersection improvements (the provision of a seperate right-rum lane at the northbound
approach), the intersection would operate at service level "B" or better during peak traffic
periods. The HCM worksheets for the 1994 scenario analysis are provided in Appendix F.
Roripaugh Residential Property 12 city of'!:emecula
'~ ," ,- '- ZZZ
~ o ~ <,,< <<< z<z<z i<< i<< i<
IZ ~; ,_,,,, ---:z== ,'*
,_-=.= ~
Focused Traffic Study Wilbur Smith Associates
B. Off-Site Traffic Impacts for Cumulative Development Traffic Projections
Table 6 presents the results of a general detcrmination of project traffic impacts at area
intersections based on the Cumulative Development scenario background traffic forecasts. The
results of this comparison indicate that the project-related increment of traffic increase would
become much less significant in the Cumulative Development scenario than was evaluated
based on existing traffic volumes.
HCM Unsign~li~cd Intersection analyses wcrc performed on the Nicolas Road intersections at
-. Koripaugh Road, West Project Access, and Warbler Circle. The Winchester Road/Nicolas
Road intersection was not included in thi~ analysis since it was already determined that a si.maal
would be required at a much earlier date. Results of the HCM Unsignalized Intersection
analysis are summarized in Table 7. Since the proposed project would not add any new traffic
to the critical tunaing movements at the intersection of Roripaugh Road/Nicholas KoacL, the
"without" an "with" project Levels of Service for the critical turning movements would be
identical. The northbound left-tuna movement, which is projected to operate at LOS F (~th
or without the project) is associated with traffic generated by the existing Roripaugh Estates
residential development. Traffic movements at the project access intersections at West Proiect
Access/Nicholas Road a~d Warbler Circle/Nicholas Road should operate at LOS C or bcncr
except for the southbound left-turning movement at both intersection locations and tha
northbound left-turn movement at Warbler Circle, which would operate at LOS ~. d,,Hng the
_evening peak-hour. While this is generally considered an unacceptable level of service, it must
be considered that only one project vehicle would bc affected at each location during the peak
hour. A relatively small number (seven) vehicles at the northbound Warbler Circle approach
would also experience delays while attempting to uarn left. Note that other than the project
related turn movements, Level of Service would bc the same "with" or "without" the project.
The HCM Unsignalizcd Intersection analysis worksheets arc provided in Appendix G.
Cumulative development evening peak hour tnffic conditions at the Winchester Road/Nicolas
Road intersection were analyzed using HCM Signalized Intersection Operational methbdology.
Results of this analysis indicate that the intersection would operate at service level "D."
C. Signal Warrant Analysis
Planning level signal warrant analyses were performed for the following intersections for the
cumulative scenario: Roripaugh Road/Nicholas Road, West Project Access/Nicholas Road, and
Warbler Circle/Nicholas Road. The results of the analysis indicate that the Cumulative
Development plus project traffic conditions would not satisfy the signal warrant during the
evening peak-hour at any of the intersections. As discussed earlier, a similar analysis was
Roripaugh Residential Property
13 city of Temecula
Table 6
Determination of Project Impact at Area Intersections
Cumulative Traffic Conditions Scenario
Roripaugh Residential Development
Intersection
Winchester Rd
@ Nicholas Rd
Roripaugh Rd
~ Nicholas Rd
West Project Access
~ Nicholas Rd
Warbler Circle
~ Nicholas Rd
N. General Kearny
@ Nicholas Rd
PM Peak Hour
Cumulative
Background Project Percent
Approach Volume Increment Added
Westbound 723 53 7.3%
Northbound 2801 59 2.1%
Southbound 2489 39 1.6%
Eastbound 1166 104 8.9%
Westbound 804 56 7.0%
Northbound 86 0 0.0%
Eastbound 1072 104 9.7%
Westbound 804 25 3.1%
Southbound 0 34 --
Eastbouncl 1072 44 4.1%
Westbound 803 4 0.5%
Northbound 11 0 0.0%
Southbound 0 24 m
Eastbound 1057 I 0.1%
Westbound 669 2 0.3%
Northbound ' 1 41 0 0.0%
Southbound 374 2 0.5%
Table 7
Levels of Service For Critical Unsignalized Intersections
Cumulative Traffic Conditions Scenario
Roripaugh Residential Development
Intersection
Nicholas Rd. &
Roripaugh Rd.
Nicholas Rd. &
West Project Access
Nicholas Rd. &
Warbler Circle
Movement
Major ~ Minor
Street Street
WB Left
EB Left
EB Left
WB Let~
NB Left
~ NB Right
I
I
SB Left
SB Right
I
I
~ NB Left
} NB Through
INB Right
SB Left
{ SB Through
! SB Rigl~t
Witl~out Project With Project.
PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Vehicles~At~)r~x. Vehicles Approx.
Affected Affected LOS
t
e I c s c
65 ~ F 65 F
21 I A 2'~1 A
i i
NA I NA 61 t B
NA I NA 1 i
NA I NA 33 I B
t
NA i NA 43 I B
6 I c 6 I c
7 I E 7 I E
NA I NA 0 t ---
4 I A 4 I A
NA I NA 1 I E
NA I NA 0 --
NA I NA 23 t B
Focused Traffic Study Wilbur Smith Associates
.,aa.erformed for existing traffic conditions at the intersection of Winchester Road/Nicholas Road,
d it was found that the peak-hour signal warrant was satisfied at that location. Planning level
signal warrant worksheets are provided in Appendix G.
D. Other Site Access Traffic Issues
This section discusses two additional site access issues which have been raised by City Staff.
Intersection Spaein~ Along Nicolas Road- Some concern has been expressed by City
regarding the spacing of access pointS along Nicolas Road which would result from the
proposed site access plan. Principal access points along Arterial classification roadways are
ideally recommended at one quarter-mile (1,.~20-foot) spacing. Existing intersection spacing
along Nicolas Road is generally 1,200 feet or greater for the more si,~gnificant residential
collector sureet intersections such as Roripaugh Road, General Keamy Road, and Calle Medusa.
Existing intersection spacing for minor residential collectors such as Via Valencia, and Warbler
Circle range from 630 feet to 950 feet. The proposed Roripaugh Residential Project access
plan would utilize the existing Warbler Circle intersection location and would introduce one
new minor residential collector intersection (West Project Access) between Koripaugh Road
and Warbler ;^~e ,2'he new intersection would result in an intersection spacing of
j C r
The desire for geater access spacing (e.g. degree of access control) is directly related to
several factors:
· The ultimate traffic volume expected to served by the facility and the relative proximity
of this volume to the roadway's capacity (volume to capacity ratio);
· The volume of traffic expected to be served by the intersecting street;
· Desired speed limit on the major street;
The anticipated interruption of traffic flows on the major street resulting from traffic
control devices ultimately needed at the intersection or from conflicting traffic movements
introduced by the presence of the intersecting minor street
In the case of Nicolas Road, the volume to capacity ratio at build-out of the City's General
Plan is projected to be in the 0.5 to 0.6 rage which represents Level of Service A. Traffic
volumes projected to be in~oduced by the project at the proposed project access intersection
locations are quite low and do not warrant signalization at either intersection. The volume of
project traffic projected to be involved in conflicting traffic movements is also very low.
Roripaugh Residential Property
14 city of Temecula
Wilbur Smith Associates
Focused Traffic Study
Based on the projected service level for the most significant of these movements, (as
determined in the Unsignalized Intersection analysis), the potential for measurable aption
to traffic flows on Nicolas Road is highly unlikely, even during peak traffic periods.
The proposed 350-foot spacing between Roripaugh Road and the West Project Access was
checked for adequacy in provicling back-to-back left-turn storage for westbound left turns from
Nicolas Road into Roripaugh Road and eastbound left-turns into the West Project Access. The
highest back-to-back left turn volumes are projected to occur during the evening peak-hour
'when approximately 20 westbound left turn vehicles (into Roripaugh Road) would be combined
with approximately 61 eastbound left-turn vehicles into the West Project Access. Even with
the provision of very conservative storage bay lengths of 100 feet (for westbound left turns)
and 150 feet (for eastbound left turns), no overlap of the left-turn bay tapers would be
necessary. It should be noted that the 22-foo~ wide center median width wou/d allow for a
considerable amount of left-turn bay taper overlap. Although we did not find a compelling
need to modify the location of the West Project Access, it should be noted that a more uniform
intersection ~acin~ could be achieved alon$.x Nicol,~ Road by shif~-g the West Proiect access
Go the e,~t approximately 235 feet to align with the second on-site north-south street from the
western project boundary.
Si.oht Distance At Warbler Circle Access Intersection- Given the location of the southbound
project access approach to Nicolas Road at Warbler Circle, (on the inside of the Nicolas Road
Curve) outbound motorists may have limited visibility to the east and west. A closer review
of this situation indicated that sight distance within the Nicolas Road right-of-way would be
approximately 325 feet to and from the east and approximately 400 feet to and from the west.
This assumes that the stop bar at the southbound Warbler Circle (project access) approach is
located 10 feet behind the Nicholas Road curb-line.
The recommended stopping sight distance for approaching traffic on the major through street
is 360 feet for a posted speed limit of 45 miles per hour and 430 feet for a posted speed limit
of 50 miles per hour. Sight distance from the west would be adequate for a speed limit of 45
miles per hour but sub-standard for a posted speed limit of 50 miles per hour. Si~t distance
from the east would only be adequate for posted speed of 40 miles per hour. Sight distance
requirements for a posted speed of 50 miles per hour could be met if the stOP bar at the
southbound Warbler Circle approach is positioned five feet from the Nicholas Koad curb-line.
Ybis minor striping adjustment would provide for the recommended 430-foot stopping sight-
distance.
Roripaugh Residential Property 1 ~ City of Temecula
Focused Traffic Study
Wilbur Smith Associates
Analysis of Proposed Site Plan
WSA b. as reviewed the proposed on-site circulation system depicted on the project site plan.
Given the low volumes of n:af~c projected for the site, we do not anticipate any on-siTe
circulation problems associated with proposed configuration of on-site local residential streets.
The proposed 36-foot curb-to-curb cross-seclion would provide adequate width at the outbound
approaches to Nicolas Road to serve the projected site traffic. The approximate 80-foot storage
provision for outbound project traffic should be adequate for peak period egress needs.
F. Off-Site Parking For Project Park Site
WSA has estimated the number of vehicles which could park off-site along the north side of
Nicholas Road and the west side of General Kearny Road. Based on standard parallel parking
dimension requirements, it is estimated that curb-space along the north side of Nicholas Road
would accommodate approximately 16 parking vehicles and curb-space along General Kearny
Road (immediately adjacent to the park site) would accommode 4 parked vehicles. A total of
approximately 20 vehicles could be accommodated along the street curbs which are
imrnediafiey adjacent to the park. It should be noted that these estimates take into account
sight distance requirements in the vicinity of the Warbler Circle project access road.
Roripaugh Residential Property
16
City of Temecula
Focused Traffic Study
Wilbur Smith Associates
VL FINDINGS AND RECOlVIlVIENDATIONS
A. Summary of Findings
Key findings of the focused traffic analysis are as follows:
· Existing peak-hour traffic volumes at the intersection of Winchester Roacl/Nicolas Road
warrant signalization of the intersection.
· The Nicolas Road widening/Santa Gertrudls Creek Flood Control project is being funded
by A.D.161 and should be underway within the next three months. This project would
improve Nicolas Road to its ultimate Arterial cross-section from Winchester P, oad to just
east of General ICeamy Road.
· The currently proposed project reflects a reduction in the already approved residential
density for the site. This reduction in density would result in an approzimate 38 to 40
percent reduction in the potential project trip generation.
· Projected 1994 traffic conditions with the project would peak-hour service levels of "C"
or better at the unsi~nalized Nicolas Road intersect-ions formed by Roripaugh Road, West
Project Access, and Warbler Circle.
· Projected Cumulative Development scenario traffic conditions with and without the project
would be identical except for those movements specifically related direct project access.
Traffic movements projected to operated at service level "E" or worse under this scenario
either do not involve project traffic movements or affect an insigni.ficant number of project
vehicles.
· Assuming signalization of the Winchester Road/Nicolas Road intersection peak-hour
service levels would be "B" or beuer for the 1994 With Project scenario and "D" or beuer
for the Cumulative Development With Project scenario.
· The volume of traffic projected at the project access intersections would not be high
enough to meet peak hour signal warrants.
Roripaugh Residential Property
17
City of Temecuin
Focused Traffic Study Wilbur Smith Associates
· Proposed access spacing along Nicolas Road would be less than the ideal spacing, but is
not anticipated to significantly impact traffic operation on Nicolas Road.
· The geometry of Nicolas lq. oad at Warbler Circle is anticipated to cause sight distance
problems unless additional sight obstruction setback requirements are imposed.
· Proposed on-site circulation provisions are determined to be adequate for the project.
B. Recommendations
WSA has developed the following recommendations based on the findings of the focused
traffic analysis:
· Maint~in the proposed lower residential density to mini~iTe project traffic generation.
· Provide appro~-imately 150 feet of vehicle storage for eastbound left turn movements into
the project site at the. West Project Access.
· Provide approximately 100 feet of vehicle storage for eastbound left turn movements into
the project site at the Warbler Circle access.
Roripaugh Residential Property
18 City. of Temecuia
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
APPLICANT'S CORRESPONDENCE ON PARKWAY LANDSCAPING WIDTH
R:\$\STAFFRPT~144PA93.pC 10/28193 Idb 50
September 16, 1993
Mr. Saied Naaseh
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
SEP 2 2 1,'194
CiTY OF TEME. CULA
P&D Environmental Services
A Division of P&D Teohnologies
1100 Town & Country Road
Suite 300
Orange. CA 92668
P.O. Box 5367
Orange, CA 92613-5367
FAX 714/953-6989
714/835-4447
An Employee-Owned Company
Re:
Nicolas Road Parkway (North Side)
PA 93-0144 (Tentative Tract Map 27827) and
PA 93-0145 (S.P. Amendment No. 2), Roripaugh
Dear Mr. Naaseh:
As you requested during our telephone conversation today, I am writing this letter to document
the design considerations which influenced proposals for the Nicolas Road parkway adjacent to
the referenced project. I am aware that the parkway width on the south side of Nicolas Road
is approximately 10' wide; however, given the design considerations described below, I am
confident that we will create an attractive landscape image within the 6' parkway proposed for
the north side of Nicolas Road. Basically, the following issues influenced our design
recommendations:
The existing houses adjacent to the south side of Nicolas Road are situated at
elevations significantly higher than that of Nicolas Road. We estimate that these
elevation differences range from 5'-10'. In contrast, the proposed pad elevations
adjacent to Nicolas Road within the Roripaugh Cottages development will be
situated at approximately the same elevation as that of Nicolas Road.
The proposed houses for the Roripaugh Cottages development are significantly
smaller than those located on the south side of Nicolas Road, including both
mussing and square footage. In fact, several of the housing types are single story
units rather than the two story units prevalent to the south.
Because of the various design configurations of proposed houiing types, the
houses proposed to back up to the north side of Nicolas Road will be located a
distance of 15'-20' away from the Nicolas Road R.O.W. As a result, the homes
in the Roripaugh Cottages project will not make as significant a visual impact as
the homes located to the south side of Nicolas Road.
In light of the smaller housing size, the variation in distance from Nicolas Road, and the lower
pad elevations, the landscape concepts proposed for the north side of Nicolas Road will create
an attractive streetscape image which will provide an adequate balance to the existing south side
parkway. As a result, when combined with a strong vegetative buffer, the existing 6' parkway
will be more than adequate to create a consistent landscape character along Nicolas Road.
If you have additional questions regarding the streetscape proposals described in this letter or
on the submitted planting plans, please do not hesitate to contact me at your earliest
convenience. I look forward to working together with you and the City of Temecula to
implement a low maintenance, drought tolerant parkway design for the Roripaugh Cottages
development.
Sincerely,
2~('~'. -/'~'/LOG.4~
R. Patrick Callihan, RLA, ASLA
Senior Landscape Architect
CC:
Mr. Steve Doyle
Mr. Sanford Edward
Mr. Don Lohr
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
EXHIBITS
R:\S\STAFFRP'r~144PA93.pC 10/28193 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT:
.. ~P'~. DATE:
Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2 (PA93-0145), Tentative Tract
Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144)
A VICINITY MAP
November 1, 1993
R:~S\STAFFRPT~144pA93.pC 10/27/93 Idb
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT:
P.C. DATE:
Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2 (PA93-0145), Tentative Tract
Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144)
B ZONING MAP
November 1, 1993 .."'~
R:\S~STAFFRPT~144PA93.pC 10/27/93 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
H
SITE
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT:
Ir~ DATE:
Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2 (PA93-O145), Tentative Tract
Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144)
c FUTURE GENERAL PLAN
November 1, 1993
R:\S\STAFFRPT\144PA93.pC 10/27/93 Idb
CITY OF TEMECULA
\
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT:
P.C. DATE:
Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144)
D TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 27827
November 1, 1993
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PAE3.pC 10/27/93 Idb
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT:
P.C. DATE:
Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144)
E
November 1, 1993
PARK
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.pC 10/27193 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.: Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144)
EXHIBIT: F TYPICAL FRONT YARD LANDSCAPING
P.C. DATE: November 1, 1993
R:\S\STAFFRPT%144PA93.pC 10/27/93 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT:
P.C. DATE:
Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144)
G TYPICAL PLOTTINGS
November 1, 1993
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.pC 10/27/93 Idb
CITY OF TEMECULA
Mmclmdq/~nl u~guli-clli-CIt's Cllw VIfw
-,,,~.
Warbler Cirde
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT:
P.C. DATE:
Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144)
HCONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPING FOR NICOLAS RD
November 1, 1993
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.pC 10/27/93 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT:
P.C. DATE:
Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144)
H2CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPING FOR NICOLAS RD
November 1, 1993
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.pC 10127193 Idb
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT:
P.C. DATE:
Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144)
I
November 1, 1993
RENDERING
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.pC 10/27/93 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT:
P.C. DATE:
r -~
Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144)
J PLAN I - FLOOR PLAN
November 1, 1993
R:\S\STAFFRPT\144PA93,pC 10/27/93 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
~ m
t,l:rT .......... _ _T '
ram= B
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT:
P.C. DATE:
Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144)
J1 PLAN 1 A - ELEVATION
November 1, 1993
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.pC 10/27/93 Idb
CITY OF TEMECULA
C
LErT
r'~oNT
FFImm
I] II lID 'D i
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT:
P.C. DATE:
Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144)
J2 PLAN 1 B - ELEVATION
November 1, 1993
R:\S~STAFFRPT%144PA93.pC 10/27/93 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
LI~rT
f~z~NT
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT:
P.C. DATE:
Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144)
J3 PLAN 1 C - ELEVATION
November 1, 1993
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.pC 10/27/93 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
I
I l~nbf I
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT:
P.C. DATE:
Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144)
K PLAN 2 - FLOOR PLAN
November 1, 1993
R:\S%STAFFRPT~144PA93.pC 10/27/93 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
IPpT
leJ~lT
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT:
P.C. DATE:
Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144)
K 1 PLAN 2A - ELEVATION
November 1, 1993
R:\S%STAFFRPT~144PA93.pC 10/27/93 Idb
CITY OF TEMECULA
rTImm
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT:
P.C. DATE:
Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144).
K2 PLAN 2B - ELEVATION
November 1, 1993
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.pC 10127/93 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
LP, I*I'
rP, ONT
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT:
P.C. DATE:
Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144)
K3 PLAN 2C - ELEVATION
November 1, 1993
R:~S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.pC 10/27/93 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT:
P.C. DATE:
Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-01'.~.)
L PLAN 3 -FLOOR PLAN
November 1, 1993
R:\S\STAFFRPT%144PA93.PC 10127/93 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT:
P.C. DATE:
Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144)
L 1 PLAN 3A -ELEVATION
November 1, 1993
R:\S~STAFFRPT~144PA93 .PC 10~27~93 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
Lr, rT
--- == · _ !1 II I _.
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT:
P.C. DATE:
Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144)
L2 PLAN 3B - ELEVATION
November 1, 1993
R:\S\STAFFRPT%144PA93,PC 10127/93 Idb
CITY OF TEMECULA
Lr'r"T
CASE NO.: Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144)
EXHIBIT: L3 PLAN 3C - ELEVATION
P.C. DATE: November 1, 1993
R:\S%STAFFRPT~144PAe3.pC 10/27/93 Idb
CITY OF TEMECULA
L_.
I
pl~el- ~L, ee~,
CASE NO.: Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144)
EXHIBIT: M PLAN 4 - FLOOR PLAN
P.C. DATE: November 1, 1993
R:%S~,STAFFRPT%144PA93.pC 10/27/93 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
L.e..PI"
- )~'.1~t
m FFI
._RRDD,
I~ieHT
CASE NO.: Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144)
EXHIBIT: M1 PLAN 4A - ELEVATION
P.C. DATE: November 1, 1993
R:\S\STAFFRPT%144PA93.PC 10127/93 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
'1
I
i
I
CASE NO.: Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144)
EXHIBIT: M2 PLAN 4B - ELEVATION
P.C. DATE: November 1, 1993
R:~S\STAFFRPT~144PA93,PC 10/27/93 Idb
CITY OF TEMECULA
I I x , ,
i I
I I
I I
i I
I
I
I
I
-.I
CASE NO.: Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144)
EXHIBIT: M3 PLAN 4C - ELEVATION
P.C. DATE: November 1, 1993
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.PC 10127/93 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
-I
' '
_, RIm m_
Ill
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT:
P.C. DATE:
Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144)
M4 PLAN 4D - ELEVATION
November 1, 1993
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PAE3.PC 10128/93 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
t
I~IP-~I' F~Looe-- PLAI'i
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT:
P.C. DATE:
Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-01 ~.*. )
N PLAN 5 -FLOOR PLAN
November 1, 1993
R:\S\STAFFRPT%144PA93.PC 10/27/93 Idb
CITY OF TEMECULA
rRCHT ..........
I
I I I
.FT~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L
Eat '3 'B
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT:
P.C. DATE:
Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-014.4. )
N1 PLAN 5A - ELEVATION
November 1, 1993
R:~S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.PC 10/27/93 Idb
CITY OF TEMECULA
m
L~rT
i I
I
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT:
P.C. DATE:
Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144)
N2 PLAN 5B - ELEVATION
November 1, 1993
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PAe3.PC 10/27193 klb
CITY
OF TEMECULA
L~rT
CASE NO.: Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 (PA93-0144)
EXHIBIT: N3 PLAN 5C - ELEVATION
P.C. DATE: November 1, 1993
R:\S\STAFFRPT~144PA93.PC 10/27/93 Idb
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
UPDATED TRAFFIC REPORT
R:~q~STAFFRF~I44PA93.CC 12/6/93 klb 36
WILBUR
SMITH
ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS · PLANNERS
3600 LIME STREET, · SUFE 220 · RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 · (q09] 27t,-05t>C · FAX (o0~;
November 22, 1993
Mr. Raymond A. Casey, P.E.
Principal Engineer/Land Development
Department of Public Works
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
RE: Tract 27827-Leo Roripaugh Property Access Needs / Conditions of Approval
Dear Mr. Casey:
Wilbur Smith Associates has reviewed the possibility of establishing a restricted access
intersection at the westerly project roadway intersection with Nicolas Road. This proposal
would differ slightly from the City's proposed condition of approval for this access point in
that eastbound left rams from Nicolas Road into the site would still be allowed. Left rams out
of this westerly access would be prohibited.
As you know, the Traffic Study prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates, determined that for the
cumulative development scenario, all traffic movements at the westerly project access
intersection would operate at Level of Service B or better during peak periods except for the
outbound left turn (heading east on Nicolas) which would operate at Level of Service E. The
inbound left mm (projected to operate at Level of Service B) would encounter sufficient gaps
in the westbound Nicolas Road traffic and would not experience significant delay. Peak period
traffic flows on westbound Nicolas Road would not be dense enough to create problems for
the inbound left turn to be completed. From a traffic engineering perspective, these findings
also suggests that the inbound left turns could be negotiated in an un-forced manner without
tompromising safety. Conversely given the poor level of service (Level of Service E) which
the outbound left mm vehicles would be subjected to, we would concur with the City in their
desire to prohibit this movement.
ALBANY. NV · ATLANTA, GA · CAIRO. EGYPT · CHARLESTON. SC · COLUMBIA. SC · COLUMBUS, OH · DES MOINES. tA · FALLS CHURCH, VA
HONG KONG · HOUSTON, TX · KNOXVILLE. TN · LEXINGTON. KY · LONDON. ENGLAND · LOS ANGELES, CA · MIAMI. T-: . NEENAH, WI
NEW HAVEr,;. CT . OAKLAND, CA · ORLANDO. FL · PITTSBURGH PA ,, PORTSMOUTH. NH · PROVIDENCE. Ri · RALEIGH. NC * RICHMOND, VA
RiVERSiDE. CA · ROSELLE. IL · SAN FRANCISCO. CA · SAN JOSE, CA · SINGAPORE . TAMPA, FL · TORONTO. CANADA · WASHINGTON, DC
EMPLOYEE-OWNED COMPANY
It should also be considered that the prohibition of left turns into the site at the westerly access
point would increase traffic circulation and associated impacts on the residential streets near
the easterly project access. Accessibility to the site by fire macks would also be somewhat
eompromised by the prohibition of left turns into the site. Based on the arguments presented
above, we request that the City consider the proposal to limit the prohibition of mining
movements at the westerly project access to outbound left turns.
If you have any questions regarding this issue, please feel free to give me a call.
Sincerely yours,
Wilbur Smith Associates
Robert A. Davis
Principal Transportation Engineer
cc. Sanford Edwards
ATTACHMENT NO. 8
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
R:~S\STAFFRP~144PA93.CC 12/8/93 klb 37
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
PLANNING APPLICATION NO.: 93-0144
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project.
:
Fee
Habitat Conservation Plan
(K-Rat)
Parks and Recreation
(Quimby)
Public Facility
(Traffic Mitigation)
Public Facility
(Traffic Signal Mitigation)
Public Facility
(Library)
Fire Protection
Flood Control
(ADP)
Consistent with Specific Plan
Consistent with Future General Plan
Condition of AOOrOval
Condition No. 10
Condition No. 93
Condition No. 80
Condition No. 75
Condition No. 6
Condition No. 100
Condition No. 38
YES ·
YES
R:\S~.STAFFRPT~I44PA93.CC 121g/93 klb ~8
ITEM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning'G''/>/
December 14, 1993
Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. 1 - Second Unit Permit -
Appeal of Conditions of Approval No. 31 and 42 (requirement for the all-
weather access to the second unit - as specifically defined by the Department
of Public Works)
Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
UPHOLDING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0179, AMENDMENT NO. 1, A PROPOSAL
TO CONSTRUCT A SECOND UNIT ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 5.23 ACRES
LOCATED AT 31550 CALLE GIRASOL AND KNOWN AS A$SESSOR'S PARCEL
NO. 914-480-006.
BACKGROUND
This project was approved by the Planning Commission at their November 1, 1993 meeting
by a (4-0) vote.
At the hearing, the applicant requested relief from the Conditions of Approval that would
require all-weather access (a 28 foot wide asphaltic concrete paved road) for emergency
vehicles. This is a requirement contained within Ordinance No. 348 for second units that are
placed more than 150 feet from a public right-of-way. At the Planning Commission meeting,
the applicant stated that the requirement to pave the all-weather access would make their
second unit permit request too costly and requested modification to the conditions requiring
this access, allowing them to use alternative paving materials (i.e. decomposed granite or
slag). The Planning Commission did not grant this request.
Staff requested the Planning Commission provide direction regarding the requirement for all-
weather access to the site. The Commission felt existing Ordinance standards should apply
to this project.
There was some ambiguity regarding what constituted public right-of-way. Aussie Road has
been offered for dedication; however, since it has not been improved to City standards, it
R:~S~STAFFRP~I?9PA93.CC 12/2/93 Idb 1
could not be accepted by the City. The City Attorney determined Aussie Road could not be
considered public right-of-way, and that the nearest public right-of-way to the site would be
Calle Girasol.
Staff received a letter from an adjacent property owner on the night of the Planning
Commission hearing, after they had taken action on the item (reference Attachment No. 6).
The applicant submitted the appeal application requesting that Conditions of Approval No. 31
and 42 (the requirement for the all-weather access - as specifically defined by the Department
of Public Works) be removed and be replaced with something "less burdensome" (reference
Attachment No. 6).
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Resolution No. 93- - Page 3
Conditions of Approval - Page 7
Planning Commission Minutes, November 1, 1993 - Page 8
Planning Commission Staff Report, November 1, 1993 - Page 9
Fee Checklist- Page 10
Correspondence - Page 12
Exhibits - Page 13
R:~S~TAFPRPT~I'7~PA~Y3.CC 12/~ ldb 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
R:\S~STAFFRPT~I79PA93.CC 11/30/93 klb ~
ATFACHMI:~NT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 9:t-
A RESOLIYrlON OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TI~IECULA, UPHOLDING ~ DECISION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION TO APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0179,
AM~.NDM~.NT NO. 1, A PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCT A SECOND UNIT
ON A PARCEL CONTAINING ~.23 ACRES LOCAT!~x} AT 31550 CALLE
GIRASOL AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 914-480-00~.
WttEREAS, Raymond and Odette Derobert and Michelle Hapoit fried Planning
Application No. 93-0179 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning
and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Planning Application was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and local hw;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Planning Application on
November 1, 1993, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time
interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, ff any, of all persons deserving to be heard, said Commission considered all facts
relating to Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. 1;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission approved
said Planning Application;
WHEREAS, an appeal of the Planning Commission decision was made in accordance
with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, and Planning Ordinances, which the City has
adopted by reference; .
WHEREAS, said Appeal application was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and local law;
Wtl~~, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Appeal on
December 14, 1993, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support
or opposition to said Appeal; and
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Staff Report regarding the Appeal;
A. The City Council, in approving of the proposed Planning Application, makes the
following findings, to wit:
1. The project is consistent with the General Plan.
R:\SXSTAFFRPT~I79PA93.CC 11/10/93 lifo
$
2. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements
of state law and local ordinances. The proposed project is consistent with Ordinance No. 348.
The project meets the criteria prescribed under Section 18.28.a. (Second Unit Permit) of
Ordinance No. 348.
3. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety and general weftare; conforms to the logical development of the land and
is compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. The
project meets the criteria prescribed under Section 18.28.a. (Second Unit Permit) of Ordinance
No. 348. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does
not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area. The project
conforms with applicable land use and development regulations.
4. The proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment
since the project is a Class 3 Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act.
B. As conditioned pursuant to Section 4, the Planning Application proposed conforms
to the logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future
development of the surrounding property.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The proposed project will not have a significant
impact on the environment since the project is a Class 3 Categorical Exemption pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecuh City Council hereby approves
Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. 1 to construct a second dwelling unit
located at 31550 Calle Ginsol and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 914-480-006 subject to the
following conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hemto.
R:\S\STAFFRPTXI79PA93.CC 11/30/93 klb ~5
Section $. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of December, 1993.
ATTEST:
J. SAL MU OZ
MAYOR
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SFAL]
STATE OF CALrI~ORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I ltl,.RI,.Ry CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 14th day of
December, 1993 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
JIJNES. G~Ph":K
CITYCLERK
R:\S\STAFFRPTH79PA93.CC 11/30/93 klb 6
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0179, AMENDMENT NO. I
R:\S~STAFFRFI'~I79PA93.CC 11/30/93 klb 7
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No.1 - Second Unit Permit
Project Description: A request to construct a new 2,195 square foot dwelling unit on
a parcel which already contains an existing 1,536 square foot structure. The new unit
will become the primary unit and the existing structure will become the secondary unit.
The project is located in the Rural Residential (R-R 2 1/2) zone. The project site is
located at 31550 Calle Girasol.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 914-480-006
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
November 1, 1993
November 1, 1998
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
The use hereby permitted by this Planning application is to construct a new 2,195
square foot dwelling unit on a parcel which already contains an existing 1,536 square
foot structure. The new unit will become the primary unit and the existing structure
will become the secondary unit.
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its
agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or proceeding against the City
of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul,
an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative
body concerning Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. I - Second Unit
Permit. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the permittee of any such claim,
action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the
defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action or
proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter,
be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
The second unit shall be used for family members or rental purposes only and may not
be sold as a separate unit unless the lot is subdivided pursuant to all applicable laws
and local ordinances.
e
The second unit shall be used as a dwelling unit only, and no businesses or home
occupations of any kind may be conducted from or in the second unit.
This al3proval shall be valid for five (5) years.
The project shall be consistent with Section 18.28.a of Ordinance No. 348.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as shown on
the site plan marked Exhibit A, or as amended by these conditions.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~179PA93.PC 1113/93 Idb 11
t
8. Building elevations shall be in substantial conformonce with that shown on Exhibit B.
Wood Siding: Earthenware (Frazee 5203 M)
Wood Trim: Candlewax (Froze. 4500 W)
Roof: Composition Shingle
Within Forty-Bght (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars
(878.00) County administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California
Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant/developer has not' delivered to the Planning Department the check required
above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be voided by reason of failure
of condition.
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
10.
Thc applioant shall oomply with Ordinanoo No. 6C3 by paying tho foo roquirod by that
ordinanoo whioh i8 booed on (thc groso aoroogc of tho parooi~ proposod for
dcvolopmont). Should Ordinonoo No. C/g3 bo suporsodod by tho proviaion¢ of a I labitat
Con.%,rvation Ran prior to tho paymont of tho foo~ roquirod by Ordinanoc No. C:v63, thc
applioont shall pay thc foc roquirod undor thc I labitat Corv3orvotion I'qan as
impicmontcd by County ordinonoc or resolution. (Deleted at the Planning Commission
hearing on November 1, 1993).
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
11.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
12.
The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1991 edition of the
Uniform Building, Plumbing and Mechanical; 1990 National Electrical Code; California
Administrative Code Title 24 Energy and Handicapped Regulations and th~ Temecula
Code.
13. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
14.
The applicant shall provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original
signature on plans submitted for plan review.
15.
The applicant shall provide electrical plan including load calcs and panel schedule,
plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review.
R:\S%STAFFRPT%179PAg3.PC 1113193 Idb 12
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true
meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department
of Public Works.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site plan all existing and
proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their
omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
General Requirements
16.
A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all onsite flat work and
improvements) grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-
of-way.
17.
18.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City
right-of-way.
All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements
contiguous to the site.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
19.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board.
No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or
the project is shown to be exempt.
20. The Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
Riverside County Health Department
Community Services District
General Telephone
Southern California Edison Company
Southern California Gas Company
21.
A Grading Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the
Department of Public Works. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code,
Chapter 70, City Standards, and as required in these Conditions of Approval.
22.
A Soils Report prepared by a registered Soils Engineer shall be submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
R:\S\STAFFRPT~179PAS3.PC 1113/93 Idb 13
23.
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weedfree condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District prior to
issuance of any permit. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has been
already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for
offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works.
A drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners for the
release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy of
the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for
review prior to recordation. The location of the recorded easement shall be delineated
on the precise grading plan.
The Developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto
or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of
streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of Ordinance No. 460 will
apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited
for drainage purposes, the Developer shall provide adequate facilities as approved by
the Department of Public Works.
The Developer shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration
of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be
provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing
facilities or by securing a drainage easement.
29.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be show~ upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to
the subject property.
Prior to the Issuance of Encroachment Permits
30.
All necessary grading permit requirements shall have been accomplished to the
satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
31.
Street plans prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Department
of Public Works shall be required for the public street. The plans and profiles shall
show the location of exiting utility facilities within the right-of-way as directed by the
Department of Public Works.
R:%S\STAFFRPT%179PA93.PC 1113193 klb 14
The Developer shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be executed
guaranteeing the construction of the following public and private improvements in
conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by me Department
of Public Works,
A. Street improvements
B. Storm drain facilities
C. Sewer and domestic water systems
33. All required fees shall be paid.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
34. The Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
· Riverside County Fire Department
· Planning Department
Department of Public Works
All necessary construction or encroachment permits have been
submitted/accomplished to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the Department of Public Works
All building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and
elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction
and site conditions.
The Developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as
established per acre/unit as mitigation for traffic signal impact.
The Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility
mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to
be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the
date on which the Developer requests its building permit for the project or any phase
thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee,
a copy of which has been provided to the Developer. Concurrently, with executing
this Agreement, the Developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public
Facility fee. The amount of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed
$10,000. The Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment
of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the
amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, the Developer will waive any
right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of
any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic
R:%S%STAFFRPT%179PA93 .PC 1113/93 tdb 15
mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; orovided that the Developer is not
waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the
amount thereof.
Prior to Issuance of Certification of Occupancy
40. The Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
Rancho California Water District
Eastern Municipal Water District
General Telephone
Southern California Edison
Southern California Gas
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
41.
All improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City
standards, including but not limited to curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive
approaches, parkway trees, street lights on all interior public streets, signing, striping,
traffic signal interconnect, and traffic signals.
42.
Adequate right-of-way shall be dedicated along Jeffery Heights Road and Aussie
Avenue to provide for a 60 foot full width right-of-way including a cul-de-sac at their
termini and required corner property line cut off in accordance with City Standards.
Article XVIII of Ordinance No. 348, Section 18.28a., Item c (10), specifies that "any
second unit placed more than 150 feet from a public right-of-way shall be required to
provide all-weather access for emergency vehicles". An all-weather access consists
of a minimum 28 foot wide asphaltic concrete paved road, per City Standards.
Therefore, an all weather access road meeting these requirements shall be provided
along Aussie Avenue from Calle Girasol to the proposed driveway to the site.
The driveway and the access to the site shall be designed and constructed relative to
the ultimate design of Aussie Avenue including a turn around per City standards at the
terminus.
In order to provide for a paved section along Aussie Avenue, the improvements shall
accommodate the natural drainage course crossing the road. All necessary permits
shall be obtained from appropriate agencies; i.e. the Department of Fish and Game,
Army Corps. of Engineers, and Regional Water Quality Control Board.
43.
In the event road or off-site right-of-way are required to comply with these conditions,
such easements shall be obtained by the Developer; or, in the event the City is required
to condemn the easement or right-of-way, as provided in the Subdivision Map Act, the
Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City for the acquisition of such
easement at the Developer's cost pursuant to Government Code Section 66462.5,
which shall be at no cost to the City.
R:~S\STAFFRPT%17~PAS3.PC 11/3193 Idb 16
OTHER AGENCIES
44.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho
California Water District transmittal dated October 14, 1993, a copy of which is
attached.
45.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County
Health Department transmittal dated October 1, 1993, a copy of which is attached.
46.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County
Fire Department transmittal dated October 25, 1993, a copy of which is attached.
R:\S%STAFFRPT%179PA93.pC 1113193 Idb 17
anch
Wmr
October 14, 1993
Mr. Matthew Fa~an
City of Tcmccula
Pl~,nning Departram
43174 Business Park DHve
Tcmecula, CA 92590-3606
Water Availability
APN 914-480-006, PA93-0179
Second Unit Permit
p,,-y..CEIV-:D
O C T 18 I':":3
Dear l~. Fagan:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of P,:mcho California Water District CKCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between
RCWD and the property. owner.
Water availability. would be contingem upon the property owner sign'~ng an
Agency Agreement which assigns water management fights, if any, to RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Senga Doherty.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
'Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
S9:SO:ebOB/F186
cc: Senga Doherry, Engineering Technician
TO(~
FROM
RE:
Cc 1rlty of l i. verslc
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
CITY OF TEMECUI~ PLANNING DEPT.
SECOND UNIT PERMIT NO. PA93-0179
DATE: October 1, 1993
RECEIVED
~t~5'tt .........
The Departmere dEnv~vmen~i Health has r~iewecl the Second Unit ~ No. P~3~179 ~ ~
~ ~ ~H~ i~ P~OR TO B~G P~ ~PROV~:
1. ~~i~ ~ ~ ~~ t~n~ ~ ~n~ ~ ~e ~ Ontlin~ ~ ~
~~ ~ W~ D~m ~ ~ ~ O~ f~ ~~ Ho~ Co~
2. A~~' 1~~le~~~~~p~g~~'
SM:dr
(909) 275-8980
RIVERSIDE C O UNTY
FIRE DEPARTNIENT
210 W"F~'T SAN JAC3~ITO AVETI. ZE · P1~.RL~, Ctx~OKNIA 92570 · (909)
0c=ober 25, 1993
'-
TO: P!~--~ -g Department
'. ATTEN: Matthew Fagan
P_E: PA93 -0179
With respect no the conditions of approval for the above referenced
second unit permit, The Fire Depar~menn recommends the following
fire protection measures be provided in accordance withthe City of
Temecu!a Ora~-~-ces ~d/or recognized fire protection sz~8~Tds:
The water mains shall be a m~n4mum of 6" diameter m-d shall be
capable of providing a potential fire flow of 500 GPM for 2 hour
duration az 20 PSI residual operating pressure
The required fire flow shall be available from a standard fire
hydrant (6"x4"x2 1/2") withinS00 feet of the property.
The applicaa:t/deve!oper shall be responsible to submit written
certification from the water company noting location of the
existing fire hydrant and the existing water system is capable of
delivering 500 GPM fire flow for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI
residual operating pressure. If a water system curren~!y does.'not
exist, the applicant/developer shall be responsible to provide
written certification than financial arrangements have been made to
provide them.
The reunited wa~er system, including fire hydrants, shall be
insza!ledand accepted by the appropriate water agencyprior to any
combustible building materials being placed on the job sine.
Driveways over 150 feet in length shall have a turn around
second unit, capable of acco-~oda~ing fire apparatus.
Any second unit placed more than 150 feet from m-y public right-of-
way shall be re.united no provide an all-weather access for
~mergency vehicles. Access shall not have an up or down grade of
more than 15%. Access will not be less n~n 12 feet in width and
will have a vertical c!ear~-ce of 13'6" Access will be free of
sharp. confined turns. Access-will be designed to withstand r. he
weight of any ~ype of emergency vehicle- Access will have a
~urning radius of 45 feet capable of accommodating fire apparatus.
~RE PREV~ITION DIVISION
~ RIVEP.~ID~ OFFI~ P~%NNING SKCTION ~ INDIO OFFICX
37~ 12~ $t~t. Riveting. CA 92S01
(909) 27~T77 - FAX (909) 3~-74Sl
79-733 Coumry Cub Dtiv~ Suite F, lndio. CA 9/=ZO i
(019) 863-8886 e FAX {619) 863-7~
All buildings shall be ca~scruc=ed wi~h fire recard~c roofing
material as descried ~ Sec~iom 3203 of ~e U~ifo~ Buil~n~ Code.
~y wood s~les or s~es s~ll be a Class "~" ~~ ~d s~l
be appr~ed by ~e fire Dep~~ prior
S~ree~ a~ess s~ll be posted, ~ a ~s~le location, m~m 4
~es ~ height, o~ ~e s~ree~ side of the buildim~ wi~h a
conchstag hammond-
Prior no =he issu~ce of buil~g pe~:s, =he developer s~!l
deposi=, wi~ ~e Ci=y of T~e~a, ~e s~ of $400.00 per
~:iga=iou for fire pronecniou ~acns.
~! ~esnio~ reg~g ~e me-.~.g of ~ese ccndizio~ shall be
referred no nhe Fire Depth Pl~--~-g ~-d ~eeriug seczicn.
~~ H. ~GIS
~ef Fire Depa~euz Pl~--er
Lain C~
Fire Safezy Speci~!isz
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
NOVEMBER 1, 1993
R:~.S\STAFFR.PT~179PA93.CC 11/30193 klb ~
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 1, 1993
It was moved by Commissioner Hoegland, seconded by Commissioner Fahey to Adopt
Resolution No. 93-25 Re-affirmino the previously adopted Negative Declaration for
Tentative Tract Map No. 26845, Amendment No. I subject to the Conditions of
Approval with the modification to Condition No. 32 and the addition of the NPDES
condition.
The motion was carried as follows:
AYES:
4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Hoagland, Ford
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM
8. PA93-0179. Second Unit Permit
Proposal to construct a new 2,195 square foot dwelling unit. New unit will become
the primary unit and the existing 1,536 square foot structure will become the
secondary unit. Located at 31550 Calle Girasol.
Assistant Planner Matthew Fagan presented the staff report. He advised Condition No.
10 has been deleted by staff.
Commissioner Hoagland said he feels the City should require for improvement of these
roads at the time of development or the City will have to go back and do the
permanent road improvement in the future.
Chairman Ford opened the public hearing at 7:10 P.M.
Paul Toomey, attorney representing the Derobert family, 34664 County Line Road,
Suite 6, Yucaipa, said the road improvement conditions would make this project
"unaffordable". Mr. Toomey said he found a discrepancy in how the-County fire
agency applies the paving issue to the different types of projects. He explained in their
schedule of maps, they extablish a sub-division with four or less parcels of the 2 1/2
acre size, they require a twenty-eight foot wide Class 2 base material road as an
acceptable method of pavement. Mr. Toomey asked that permanent road
improvements be applied to any development on this parcel. Mr. Toomey said the
approval is for a temporary application and the owner would have to come back in five
years and re-apply.
It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland to approve staff recommendation.
Commissioner Blair seconded the motion for discussion.
PCMIN 11101193
-6.., 11 I15/93
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
NOV;MBER 1. 1993
Director Thornhill asked if the Commission wants to leave determination of the base
road material with the County fire agency.
Commissioner Hoagland said he feels it is the City's obligation to bring areas up to
urban standards.
Commissioner Fahey said the City is an urban area however, there are several rural
areas in the City that want to remain rural. Commissioner Fahey said she favors some
leniency, however if it was to be an all weather road. If it is going to be a public right-
of-way, the Commission should approve it with the appropriate conditions'based on
the ordinance.
It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Blair to close
the public hearing at 7:20 P.M. and Adoot Resolution No. 93-26 approving PA93-
0179, Amendment No. 1 based on the analysis and findings contained in the staff
report and subject to the Conditions of Approval, deleting Condition No. 10.
The motion was carried as follows:
AYES: 4
NOES: 0
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey, Hoagland, Ford
None
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
PA 93-0145 (Soecific Plan No. 164. Amendment No. 2)
PA 93-0144 (Tentative Tract Mao No. 278~7)
A proposed request for Approval of Amendment No. 2 to Specific Plan No. 164 in
order to Change the Zoning for Planning Areas 7 (22.5 acres) and 8 (10.1 acres) from
Very High Density Residential (20 Dwelling Units Per Acre) to High Density Residential
(12 Dwelling Units Per Acre), to add a three (3) acre park and adjust the boundaries
between Planning Areas 7, 8 and 9 and approval of Tentative Tract Tract Map No.
27827, a 162 single family lot subdivision plus a three (3) acre lot for a public park
within Planning Area No. 7.
Planner Saied Naaseh presented the staff report. He advised the Commission the
applicant does not wish to form a Homeowners Association. He said staff has worked
with the applicant to resolved many issues. Changes to the Conditions of Approval
were distributed by memorandum dated November 1, 1993 from the Planning
Department.
Chairman Ford opened the public hearing at 7:40 P.M.
Sanford Edward, 110 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, representing the
applicant, provided an overview of the project's history.
PCMIN 11/01193 -6- 11 I15/93
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
NOVEMBER 1, 1993
R:~S\STAFFRFr~179PA93.CC 11/30/93 kib 9
STAFF REPORT o PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
November 1, 1993
Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. I - Second Unit Permit
Prepared By: Matthew Fagan
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning
Commission:
ADOPT Resolution No. 93 approving
Amendment No. I based upon the Analysis
contained in the Staff Report.
PA 93-0179,
and Findings
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Raymond and Odette Derobert and Michelle HalDolt
REPRESENTATIVE:
Paul Toomey
PROPOSAL:
To construct a new 2,195 square foot dwelling unit; whereby,
the new unit will become the primary unit and the existing 1,536
square foot structure will become the secondary unit.
LOCATION:
31550 Calle Girasol - on corner of Calte Girasol, north of the
intersection of Calle Girasol and Riverton Lane
EXISTING ZONING:
R-A 2~ (Residential Agricultural, 2~ acre minimum parcel size)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North: R-R 2~ (Rural Residential, 2~ acre minimum
parcel size)
South: R-A 2 ~ (Residential Agricultural; 2 ~ acre
minimum parcel size) and R-T (Mobilehome
Subdivisions and Mobilehome Parks)
East: R-A 2 ~ (Residential Agricultural, 2 '~ acre
minimum parcel size)
West: R-R 2~ (Rural Residential, 2½ acre minimum
parcel size) and R-T (Mobilehome Subdivisions and
Mobilehome Parks)
PROPOSED ZONING:
Not requested
FUTURE GENERAL
PLAN DESIGNATION:
Very Low Density Residential (.2-.4 dwelling units/acre)
R:\S\STAFFRPT~179PA93.PC 10128t93 luo
EXISTING LAND USE:
Single-Family Residence
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Single-Family Residence
Single-Family Residence
Single-Family Residence
Single-Family Residence
PROJECT STATISTICS
Total Area
Building Height
Project Density
Earthwork Amount
5.23 acres (227,820 square feet)
1 story
2.61 du/acre
780 cubic yards cutl 570 cubic yards fill
BACKGROUND
Planning Application No. PA93-0179 was formally submitted to the Planning Department on
September 21,1993. A Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting was held on October
7, 1993. Planning Application No. PA93-0179 was deemed complete on October 19, 1993.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project is a proposal to construct a new 2,195 square foot dwelling unit on a parcel that
contains an existing dwelling unit. The new unit will be a manufactured home and will become
the primary unit. The existing 1,536 square foot structure is also a manufactured home and
it will become the secondary unit.
ANALYSIS
Ordinance Reouirements and Fees
Pursuant to Section 18.28.a.c.(10) of Ordinance No. 348, any second unit placed more than
150 feet from a public right-of-way shall be required to provide all-weather access for
emergency vehicles. According to the Department of Public Works, all-weather access for
this particular project consists of a 28 foot wide asphaltic concrete paved road. This would
mean that the project proponent would have to supply approximately 500 feet of 28 foot
wide aspbaltic concrete paved road to provide all-weather access per Ordinance No. 348. The
applicant has expressed that this would be a hardship for them in this particular instance - that
the requirement to pave the all-weather access would make their second unit permit request
too costly.
In addition to access to the site, the Fire Department has access requirements on-site. They
require the same type of paving material as the Department of Public Works. The applicant
ctaims that this too will make their project cost prohibitive.
Planninq Commission Direction to Staff ReQardina Reouirements for Second Units
Staff is supportive of the concept of second units; however, the requirement for all weather
access will prove to be cost prohibitive for people wanting to construct them. Staff requests
that the Planning Commission provide direction on this matter relative to enforcing this
R:\S~qTAFFRPT%179PA93.PC 10128193 klb 2
requirement under Ordinance No. 348, or whether an Ordinance Amendment for this
requirement would be appropriate.
Consistency With State Law
Due to the economic hardship that the applicant would incur as a result of strict adherence
to Section 18.28.a.c.(10) of Ordinance No. 348 (paving the road and driveway
improvements), Staff requested clarification from the City Attorney to determine whether the
requirements under Ordinance No. 348 were consistent with State Law. The City Attorney
determined that the City of Temecula Second Unit Ordinance was in fact consistent with
State Law. Pursuant to Section 65852.2 of the California Government Code, any local
agency may, by ordinance, provide for the creation of second units in single-family and multi-
family residential zones. The provisions contained in this section of the Code allow Cities to
impose standards that "...include, but are not limited to". This gives cities the opportunity
to impose standards more stringent than those contained in this Section of the Code.
Riverside County did in fact adopt more stringent standards that the City subsequently
adopted.
Site Desion/Architecture/Area Compatibility
The new residence will be located in front of the existing structure (it has-been placed above
a natural drainage course, and both dwellings will have to cross the drainage course for
access). The structure will consist of manufactured units and is approximately 2,195 square
feet with a two car garage. The new structure will have wood siding (light brown) with wood
trim (light tan). The roof will be composition-shingle. The new residence will be compatible
with the surrounding neighborhood in terms of materials, colors and scale.
EXISTING ZONING AND FUTURE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
Existing zoning for the site is R-A 2 ~/2 (Residential Agricultural, 2 ~ acre minimum parcel size).
Second units are permitted in al residential zones provided that a second unit permit is granted
pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.28oa. of Ordinance No. 348. The draft General Plan
land use designation for the site is Very Low Density Residential (.2 - .4 dwelling units/acre).
The project as proposed is consistent with Ordinance No. 348, and the draft General Plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment since the project
is a Class 3 Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act.
Class 3 includes the construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or
structures. The number of structures described in Section 15303 of the CEQA Guidelines are
the maximum allowable on any legal parcel or to be associated with a project within a two
year period. Examples per the Guidelines include single-family residences not in conjunction
with the building of two or more such units.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. 1 is a proposal to construct a new 2,195
square foot dwelling unit on a parcel that contains an existing dwelling unit. The new unit will
become the primary unit, and the existing 1,536 square foot structure will become the
R:\S~STAFFRPT~179PA83.PC 10128193 klb 3
secondary unit, 'The new residence will be located in front of the existing structure, The
new residence will be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood in terms of materials,
colors and scale,
Pursuant to Section 18.28,a.c.(10) of Ordinance No, 348, any second unit placed more than
150 feet from a public right-of-way shall be required to provide all-weather access for
emergency vehicles. In addition to access to the site, the Fire Department has requirements
for all-weather access on-site. All-weather access for this particular project consists of a 28
foot wide asphaltic concrete paved. road. The applicant has expressed that this would be a
hardship for them in this particular instance - that the requirement to pave the all-weather
access would make their second unit permit request too costly. Staff is requesting that the
Planning Commission provide direction on this matter relative to enforcing this requiremen+~
under Ordinance No. 348, or whether an Ordinance Amendment for this requirement wou~d
be appropriate.
FINDINGS
There is reasonable probability that Planning Application No. 93-0179 - Second Unit
Permit proposed will be consistent with the General Plan proposal being considered or
studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time.
e
There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the
future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with
the plan.
The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law
and local ordinances. The proposed project is consistent with Ordinance No. 348. The
project meets the criteria prescribed under Section 18.28.a. (Second Unit Permit) of
Ordinance No. 348.
e
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical development of the land and is
compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding
property. The proiect meets the criteria prescribed under Section 18.28.a. (Second
Unit Permit) of Ordinance No. 348. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on
surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the present
or planned land use of the area. The project conforms with applicable land use and
development regulations.
The proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment since the
project is a Class 3 Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act.
R:~S~$TAFFRPT~179PA93.PC 10128193 Idb 4
Attachments:
PC Resolution - Blue Page 6
Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 10
Exhibits - Blue Page 18
A. Vicinity Map
B. Future General Plan Land Use Designation
C. Zoning Map
D. Site Plan
E. Elevations
F. Floor Plans
R:\S~'TAFFRPT~179PA93.PC 10128/93 Idb 5
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
R:\S~STAFI~,PT~I79PA93.CC 11/30/93 klb '[ 0
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project.
Fee
Habitat Conservation Plan
(K-Rat)
Parks and Recreation
(Quimby)
Public Facility
(Traffic Mitigation)
Public Facility
(Traffic Signal Mitigation)
Public Facility
(Library)
Fire Protection
Flood Control
(ADP)
Consistent with Specific Plan
Consistent with Future General Plan
Condition of Approval
N/A
N/A
Condition No. 39
N/A
N/A
Condition No. 46
Condition No. 24
N/A
YES
R:XSXSTAFPRPTXI79PA93.CC 11/30/93 kdb 11
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
CORRESPONDENCE
R:\S\STAFFRPT~I79PA93.CC 11/30/93 kib 12
1 November 1993
Mr. Matthew Fagan
Planning Department
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Dear Mr. Fagan:
I reviewed the plans for the second unit permit at 31550 Calle
Girasol. My only concern is with the material proposed for the roof,
composition shingle. While these shingles are more fire resistant than
wood, I believe that a tile or synthetic roofing material would afford
greater fire protection. These materials are generally used in most
currently built structures and therefore would better match the
recent and future dwelling units in the immediate area. My concern
is based on living immediately next to the proposed second unit and
in an area largely underdeveloped with a significant brush fire
hazard.
Sincerely, ~
Dennis Fitz
39910 Jeffrey Heights Rd.
Temecula, CA 92591
l
November 9, 1993
City Temecula
43 174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Attention:
City Council Members
Planning Department
Regarding: Second Unit Permit Case No. 93-0179
Appeal of Conditions.
Project Description: Proposal to construct a new 2,195 square foot dwelling unit on a
parcel that cmTen~y contains a 1,536 square foot dwelling unit.
The new unit wffi become the primary units and the existing unit
will become the secondary unit.
Zone:
Site Address:
Rural Residential (R-R 2 1/2)
31550 Calle Girasol
Appeal Request:
Revise conditions (#31 & #42) requiring the paving of the access
road to the new unit to permit the use of an alternate surface
material.
Appeal Justification:
Mr. and Mrs. Deroben are attempting to move next to their duaghter on her 5 acre parcel of
land in Temecula. They look to their daughter for assistance and support as old age begins
to affect their lives. Additionally, as a single working parent, their daughter would benefit
from the childcare that would be provided by the Deroberts. It is these type of
circumstances that typically create the need for second units and most likely why l.a:nd use
provisions were established initially.
At its basic form, this proposal is essentially the construction of a single family mobile
home on a parcel with an existing house. However, in this case the permit approval is in
effect for five years and must be renewed for continued occupancy.
Section 18.28a, Item c(10) of Ordinance No. 348 states that "any second unit placed more
than 150 feet from a public right-of-way shall be required to provide all-weather access for
emergency vehicles." The Fire Department indicates a solid paved surface is considered
"all-weather." The City Engineer has defined all-weather access as 28 feet wide asphaltic
concrete pavement, per City Standards. Therefore, the condition for all-weather access
(#42) requires A.C. pavement on Aussie Road, extending from Calle Girasol
approximately 500 feet to the private driveway of the second unit. Condition No. 31
requires engineered street improvement plans to be prepared for this all-weather access
road.
34636 County Line Road, Suite31 o Yuoaipa, CA92399 ° (714) 795-1899
Based on an engineer's estimate, the cost to satisfy these conditions will exceed $18,000.
Which includes plus, soils report, 3" s.c. pavement, 6" base material and installation.
Combined with $5,000 in development fees, the costs exceed $23,000. Mr. and Mrs.
Derobert are unable to absorb these costs and would not be able to continue with the
project
In researching past access requirements, it was discovered that Riverside County Fire
Department (per discussion with Dan Wagner) allows single family homes to have gravel
or dirt driveways, regardless of the distance from public right-of-way. In fact, as a point
of consistency, under Riverside County approval, Schedule 'H' subdivisions (4 or less
parcels greater than 1 acre) are permitted to surface graded din roads with Class II Base
Material (where the road in not maintained by the County). As a result, emergency vehicles
are ~raveling on unimproved roads and unimproved access driveways to serve single family
dwelling units.
Therefore, The Deroberts request to have the same level of requirements assessed on their
project as are levied on similar projects under the same ordinances. It may not require an
amendment to the ordinance, in some cases where the density is greater in a more urban
setting, the pavement requirement may be necessary. An interpretation of "all-weather"
access for rural conditions by the City Council may provide the action necessary to satisfy
the appeal request.
It should be noted that the required paving is to be installed within Aussie Road, an offer of
dedication right-of-way that has not been accepted by the City. However, the ordinance
specifies as the point of measurement for the 150 foot distance a "public right-of-way." At
the time of the Planning Commissin Hearng it was apparently unclear as to the
determination of Aussie Road's classification as a public right-of-way. ff determined to be
public right-of-way, the new dwelling unit is within 150 feet, therefore, no paving
requirement is necessary.
Considering that the nature of the development is a single family house, the costs are
beyond what is affordable, the environmental setting is large lot-rural conditions, and the
permit is temporary, the subject request appears consistent with the intent of the second unit
provisions and the General Plan goals for affordable housing.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
TO~MF, Y ~ A~,SOCIATES
Plan~ing Consul ~nt
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
EXHIBITS
R:\S\STAIqq~Y~179PA93.CC 11/30/93 klb ~ 3
CITY OF TEMECULA
PROJECT SITE ___
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT: A
P.C. DATE:
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0179, AMENDMENT NO. I -.
VICINITY MAP
NOVEMBER 1, 1993
R:\S\STAFFRP'h179PA83.PC 10/19/93 Idb
CITY OF TEMECULA
.I
-- ; ./
SITE
VL!
EXHIBIT B - FUTURE GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION: VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
// . ~ -
- /, _...__ _.1 cj
t
SITE
: I ,
R-A,-'2 1/2:
· Ih .t
,711 .
' I
r--J l .
II ·
/~.
EXHIBIT C - ZONING
DESIGNATION: R-A 2~ (RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL, 2~ ACRE MINIMUM)
CASE NO.:
P.C. DATE:
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0179, AMENDMENT NO. 1
NOVEMBER 1, 1993
R:\S%STAFFRPT%179PA93 .PC 10119/93 Idb
CITY OF TEMECULA
meer. ke=- m
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT: D
P.C. DATE:
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0179, AMENDMENT NO. 1
SITE PLAN
NOVEMBER 1, 1993
R:\S~STAFFRPT%179PA93.PC 10119193 Idb
CITY OF TEMECULA
MATERIAL.: Wad Trim MATIRIAL: Wood Sims
C:OU3t: C. mdmx O3tOR: F,,miwmm
SPECb'F..A110N: F. mmm 4500 W SPSC3FF. ATiON: r. rmm 52~ M
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT: E
P.C. DATE:
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0179, AMENDMENT NO. 1
ELEVATIONS
NOVEMBER 1, 1993
R:~,S~STAFFRPT~179PA93.PC 10/19/93 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
14n I
K-m.tt '
I,! ........ ~
tvl~'Tr_~: ~ ~'1" fAYlilY
CASE NO.: PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0179, AMENDMENT NO. 1
EXHIBIT: F FLOOR PLAN
P.C. DATE: NOVEMBER 1, 1993
R:\S\STAFFRI:rr'%179PA93 .PC 10119193 klb
ITEM
NO.
18
APPROVAL ~
CITY ATTORNEY "'
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
STAFF REPORT
TO:
City Council/City Manager
FROM:
City Attorney/Finance Officer
DATE:
December 14, 1993
SUBJECT:
Disposition and Development Agreement Between the Redevelopment
Agency - City of Temecula and the Donna L. Reeves Trust U.T.D. 7-25-93
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Conduct a public hearing.
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-__
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING A DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT, A PROPERTY EXCHANGE AGREEMENT AND A
LEASE BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE DONNA L. REEVES
TRUST U.T.D. 7-25-90"
DISCUSSION: The Donna L. Reeves Trust U.T.D. 7-25-90 ("Reeves") owns an
automobile sales and service center located at 27500 Jefferson Road, known'as Honda of
Temecula. In order to expand its business, Reeves proposes to relocate its operations to a
site on Ynez Road. Reeves further proposes to purchase the Mazda/Acura automobile
sales and service center located at 26755 Ynez Road, and expand its operation. Agency
Staff anticipates that this will result in a substantial increase in taxable sales by both
dealerships, thereby increasing City revenues. Reeves also proposes to lease back the
Jefferson site for one year at $20,000/month in order to phase its relocation to Ynez
Road.
In order to facilitate these transactions, it is recommended that the
Redevelopment Agency acquire the Ynez Site, exchange it for Reeves' Jefferson Road
property, and lease it back to Reeves for one year for $20,000/month. In summary, the
transactions would be as follows:
r:%AOe~da. RptVN~de,cc
Agenda Report - D & D Agreement with Donna L. Reeves Trust
December 14, 1993
Page 2.
Transaction 1: The Redevelopment Agency would purchase the real
property located at 26755 Ynez Road, with tax increment funds. The purchase price is
~ 1,000,000 subject to a $1,000,000 trust deed.
Transaction 2: The Agency would exchange the 26755 Ynez Road
property with Reeves for the 27500 Jefferson Road property. This would amount to an
I.R.C. § 1031 exchange, enabling Reeves to defer its tax gain on the sale of the Jefferson
site.
Transaction 3: The Agency would lease back to Reeves for one year at
$20,000/month the 27500 Jefferson Road property to be used as an automobile sales and
service center.
Transaction 4: The Agency and Reeves would enter into a Disposition
and Development Agreement ("DDA") to operate the 26755 Ynez Road property as an
automobile sales and service center for a minimum of five years.
The effect of these transactions will be that the Agency will acquire the
Jefferson Road property for $2 Million Dollars. The Agency has obtained its own appraisal
of the Jefferson and Ynez Road properties. This appraisal indicates that the fair market
value of the Jefferson Road property is $2 Million Dollars. A copy of the appraisal is on
file with the City Clerk in the City of Temecula and is available for public review. A more
detailed summary of these transactions, as required pursuant to Section 33433 of the
California Redevelopment Law, is attached to this report.
California Redevelopment Law requires that the City Council approve by
Resolution any sale or lease that provides for the disposition of property acquired with tax
increment funds. In this case, the DDA, Exchange and Lease provide for the Agency
acquiring the Ynez Road property through tax increment funds, exchanging it for the
Jefferson Road property, and leasing the Jefferson Road property. In order to approve this
use of tax increment, the City Council must find that "the consideration is not less than
the fair market value of the property in accordance with the covenants and cenditions
governing the sale or lease or, with respect to any sale or lease of less than the estimated
value, determined at the highest use permitted under the Plan, that such lesser
consideration is necessary to effectuate the purposes of the Plan."
In this case, the effect of the transactions will be that the Agency will
acquire the Jefferson Road property for $2 Million Dollars, its estimated fair market value.
Further, the lease of the Jefferson site amounts to a 10% return on the Agency's
investment in the property. This is over twice the Agency's interest rate if the same funds
were in the Agency's typical investment vehicle, Local Agency Investment Fund.
Consequently, it is recommended that the City Council find that the consideration received
for the Ynez and Jefferson properties is not less than the fair market value of the
properties in accordance with the covenants and conditions accompanying the sale and
r:%~4e~a.Rpt%l~de.cc
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby resolves as
follows:
Section 1. The City Council hereby finds that the consideration received by the
Agency in exchanging the Ynez Road properly for the Jefferson Road property is not less
than the fair market value of the Ynez Road property in accordance with the covenants and
conditions governing the sale and exchange of the Ynez Road property.
Section 2. The City Council hereby finds that the consideration received by the
Agency in leasing the Jefferson Road property is not less than the fair market value of the
property in accordance with the covenants and conditions governing the lease of the property.
Section 3. Based upon the above finding, the City Council of the City of Temecula
hereby approves that Disposition and Development Agreement by and between the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and the Donna L. Reeves Trust, UTD ?-25-
90.
Section 4.
resolution.
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Temecula on the _ day of , by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: DIRECTORS:
NOES: DIRECTORS:
ABSENT:
DIRECTORS:
ATTEST:
J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R:XR~*°*x341 2
SUMMARY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 33433
of the
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT LAW
on a
DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
by and between the
REDEVR. LOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
and
THE DONNA l.. REEVES TRUST U.T.D. 7-25-90
This summary report has been prepared for the Temecula
Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") pursuant to Section 33433 of the
California Health and Safety Code. This reports sets forth
certain details in the proposed Disposition and Development
Agreement ("DDA") between the Agency and the Donna L. Reeves
Trust, U.T.D. 7-25-90 ("Reeves").
The DDA requires the Agency to acquire the property
located at 26755 Ynez Road and exchange it with Reeves for the
property located at 27500 Jefferson Road. The Agency will then
turn lease back to Reeves the Jefferson Road property.
As required by the Community Redevelopment Law, this
report also describes and specifies:
1. The cost of the proposed DDA to the Agency.
2. The estimated value of the interests to be acquired and
leased, determined at their highest uses permitted
under the Redevelopment Plan;
3. The purchase price and sum of the lease payments to be
paid by the Reeves for the interests being leased.
This report and the proposed DDA are to be made available for
public inspection prior to the approval ofthe DDA.
LAX:7.5692.1
Agenda Report - D & D Agreement with Donna L. Reeves Trust
December 14, 1993
Page 3.
lease, respectively. Accordingly, it is recommended that the City Council adopt the
Resolution approving the DDA, Exchange and Lease.
FISCAL IMPACT: $2 Million Dollars in tax increment funds will be expended by the
Agency to acquire the Jefferson Road property. An additional
$5,000 will be paid by the Agency for miscellaneous closing costs.
The Agency will receive $240,000 from Reeves pursuant to the Lease. By relocating
Reeves' Honda operations to Ynez, 25% of the sales tax revenues from the dealership will
become subject to the Sales Tax Agreement for CFD 88-12.
Twenty-five percent (25%) of the sales tax revenue generated by automobile sales and
service from Honda after it is relocated to Ynez Road will be reimbursed to the property
owners located in CFD 88-12 pursuant to the Sales Tax Agreement for that district.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution of Approval
Summary report regarding DDA
Excerpt from appraisal for 26755 Ynez Road and 27500
Jefferson Road
RESOLUTION NO. 93- ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DISPOSITION AND
DEVELOPMI~NT AGREEMENT, A PROPERTY
EXCHANGE AGREEMF~NT AND A LEASE BY AND
BETWEEN THE R~FsEVELOP1V!~NT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE DONNA L. REEVES
TRUST U.T.D. 7-25-90
WHEREAS, the Donna L. Reeves Trust, U.T.D. 7-25-90 ("Reeves") currently
operates an automobile sales and service center, known as Honda of Temecula, at 27500
Jefferson Road;
WHEREAS, Reeves proposes relocating its operations to the auto mall located along
Ynez Road;
WHEREAS, Reeves further proposes to acquire the Mazda/Acura dealership located
at 26755 Ynez Road and expand it;
WHEREAS, it is anticipated that the relocation of the Honda dealership to Ynez
Road and the expansion of the Mazda/Acura dealership will encourage the economic growth
of the auto mall and result in a substantial increase in sales tax revenue to the City;
WHEREAS, The Re, development Agency of the City of Temecula proposes to enter
into following transactions:
Purchase the property at 26755 Ynez Road, Temeeula, with tax increment
funds for $1,00000, subject to a $1,000,000 trust deed;
(2)
Exchange the property located at 26755 Ynez Road with Reeves for real
property located at 27500 Jefferson Road subject to a $1,000,000 trust deed;
(3)
Lease back to Reeves for one year at $20,000 per month the Jefferson Road
property to be used as an automobile sales and service center;
(4)
Enter into a Disposition and Development Agreement CDDA") with Reeves to
operate the 26755 Ynez Road property as an automobile sales and service
center for a minimum of five years.
WHEREAS, the effect of the purchase of the Ynez property and the exchange of that
property for the Jefferson Road property is that the Agency will be paying $2,000,000 for
the Ynez Road property, which is consistent with the fair market value of the Ynez Road
property as determined by an independent appraisal obtained by the Agency;
R:~Reso,~341 I
Summary of DDA
Re: Temecula
Pace 2
SUMMARY OF DDA
Ae
ACOUISITION A~D EXCHANG~ OF YN~Z PROPERTY FOR JEFFERSON
ROAD PROP~RTY~.
Cost to the Agency: The acquisition cost for the Ynez
Road property is one million dollars ($1,000,000).
There will be no clearance costs, relocation costs or
costs of improvements and no interest on loans or bonds
to finance the transfer.
Reeves owns the Ynez Road property. Reeves will
exchange the Ynez Road property for the Jefferson Road
Property. The Jefferson Road property will be subject
to a deed of trust in the amount of one million dollars
($1,000,000). Immediately following acquisition of the
Jefferson Road property, the Agency will pay off the
deed of trust.
The net effect of the acquisition of the Ynez Road
property and the exchange of the property for the
Jefferson Road property will be that the Agency will
acquire the jefferson Road property for two million
dollars ($2,000,000). The appraised value of the Ynez
Road property based upon its use as automobile sales
and service center is two million-one hundred thousand
dollars ($2,100,000). The appraised value of the Ynez
Road property based upon the use of the property is an
automobile sales and service center is two million
dollars ($2,000,000).
B. LEASE OF JEFFERSON ROAD PROPERTY
Cost to the Agency: The land acquisition cost is two
million dollars ($2,000,000.) There will be no
clearance costs, relocation costs, costs of
improvements and no interest costs or bonds.
The value of leasehold interest to be transferred based
upon highest and best use of property for automobile
storage, repair, and auto dealership accessory uses is
no greater than twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.) per
month for one year. The sum of the lease payment is
two hundred forty thousand dollars $240,000).
Summary of DDA
Re: Temecula
Pa~e 3
DATED:
Value for the leasehold interest to be transferred to
the Reeves Trust for a e year perio s~all be twenty
r//ETerty so leased.
11/
David Dixon, Execu e Director
Redevelopment Agency
CITY OF TEMECULA
_4X:7~.1
1
t
1
Propet'O' Aavzsoty Consuttantb'
Real Estate Analysts attd Consultantf
Bradford L. Adams, MAt
Margaret Adams, MAt
Daniel J. Byers
October 10, 1993
Ms..Mary Jane McI. arney
Finance Officer
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Re:
Appraisal of the Honda (27500 Jcffcrson Avenue) and Mazda/Acura (26799 Yncz Road)
Auto Sales and Service Ccnters, T~mecula, California.
Dear Ms. McLamey:
Pursuant to your request and authorization, we have conducted the investigations and analyses
necessary to form opinions of the market value of the fee simple interests in the above-
referenced properties.
This appraisal has been performed so as to be in conformance with the Uniform Standards of
Professionsl Appraisal Practice (USPAP) and the Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice
of the Appraisal Institute of which the signatory is a member.
Based on the investigations conducted, the analyses made, and upon our experience as real estate
analysts and appraisers, subject to the Assumptions and l .imiting Conditions which follow, we
have formed the folowing opinions regarding the market values of the fee simple interests, as
of September 27, 1993:
HOI~IDA (~E~EI~ON AVENUE)
TWO MILLION DOLLARS
$2,000,000
MAZDA/AC'JRA (YNEZ ROAD)
TWO MILLION ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS
$2,100,000
ESTIMATED MARKETING/CLOSING PERIOD
12 MONTHS OR I,ESS
P.O. BOX 3646 · RANCHO SANTA FE, CALIFORNIA 92067 · 1619) 756-9504 Phone · {619} 756-9624 Fax
Ms. Mary Jane McLarney
October 10, 1993
Page Two
The following Summary of Salient Data and Conclusions iremiTes the important facts,
descriptions and opinions concerning the subject properties. Following the summary is the
complete narrative report which sets forth the data and analyses upon which our,~.p. inions of
market value are, in part, predicated.
Respecff'ully submitted,
PROPERTY ADVISORY CONSULTANTS
Bradfo~ L. Adams,"MAI
CA Cen. AG008831
SUMMARY OF SALIENT DATA AND CONCLUSIONS
* ,
Property Type:
Property Location:
Thomas Brothers Map:
Physical Data:
Year Built:
Improvement Size:
Construction Type:
Condition:
Ftmctional Utility:
Site Ar~a:
Earthquake Zone:
Flood Zone Designation:
Highest and Best Use As Vacant:
Highest and Best Use:
Market Value of the Land:
· Market Value:
Estimated Marketing Period:
Date of Value:
Date of Report:
Two auw sales and service centers
27500 Jefferson Avenue (Honda) and
26799 Ynez ROadr.fl~_aZaf.~),
Temecula, California.
125 V/x xo da) & .125
(Mazda/Acura), Riverside County
1985 (Honda) & 1988 (MaTAa/Ac~ra)
12,105 SF (Honda) & 11,065 SF
0vhz~Acura)
Class D/S (Honda) & Class C/S
0~x~Acura)
Average (Honda) & Good
e~azda~Acun)
Adequate
2.40 acres (Honda) & 2.44 acres
0v~d~Acura)
Zone X
Fee Simple
Hold for future development (Honda)
& develop as a build-to-suit for an auto
sales&serviceeenter(Mazda/Acm-a).
As Improved.
$1,i00,000 (Honda) & $1,010,000
(Mazda/Acura)
$2,000,000 (Honda) & $2,100,000
(Mazda/Am)
12 months or less
September 27, 1993
October 1 O, 1993
ITEM NO. 19
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
City Attorney/Director of Finance
December 14, 1993
Use of Redevelopment Bond Proceeds for Construction of City
Administrative Offices and Corporate Yard
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
'A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE EXPENDITURE OF TAX
INCREMENT FUNDS BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CITY
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES AND A CORPORATION YARD
NORTH OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND WEST OF DIAZ ROAD".
DISCUSSION: Bank of America has recently come into ownership of Tract 21383
through a foreclosure sale. This Tract was previously owned by Johnson + Johnson.
Bank of America has indicated to City Staff a willingness to grant to the City eight (8)
acres of land within the Tract comprising Lots 20-25, 29 and 30. This property is located
north of Winchester Road and West of Diaz Road, near the Rancho California Water
District Headquarters. Bank of America proposes to deed the property to the City in
consideration for the City agreeing to construct its City Administrative Offices on the site
within the next two years, and to maintain the City Administrative Offices on the site for
at least ten (10) years. (City Staff expects to receive a written offer to this effect shortly.)
On or about February 23, 1993, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula
issued Series 1993 Tax Allocation Bonds in the amount of $17,355,000. The proceeds of
these bonds were intended to be used to fund the acquisition, planning, design,
improvement and equipping of various public facilities within the City. It should be noted
that at least 90% of these funds must be used for construction of public facilities such as
Agenda Report - City Administrative Offices
December 14, 1993
Page 2.
buildings end streets. These bonds will be repaid with tax increment revenues. The
maturity date of the bonds runs from 1994 through 2013, and the interest rate varies from
5.25% to 5.50%.
Current redevelopment law requires that before tax increment funds may be used for
public facilities, such as City Administrative Offices, a public hearing must be conducted
and the City Council must make certain findings justifying the expenditure. Specifically,
Health & Safety Code § 33445 provides that before tax increment funds may be used to
finance public facilities, the City Council must make the following findings:
That the building, facilities, structures, or other improvements are of benefit to the
Project Area, or the immediate neighborhood in which the project is located.
That no other reasonable means of financing such building, facilities, structures or
other improvements are available to the community.
Presently, the City leases its Administrative Offices, located at 43174 Business Park Drive
and its Corporate Yard, located at 28763 Front Street. In order for the City to provide a
full range of municipal services to the residents of the Redevelopment Project Area as well
as the entire City, it is necessary that permanent City Administrative Offices and a
Corporate Yard be constructed.
The City has recently been offered property located in Tract 21383, to be granted to the
City at no cost. Construction of permanent City facilities on this property will enable the
City to provide a full range of municipal services to the residents of the Redevelopment
Project Area as well as the entire City.
The proposed site for the City's Administrative Offices and Corporate Yard is located
within a Business Park that is already in substantial economic distress. The Business Park
has already been through foreclosure and has previously been in default on its property
taxes and special assessments. The Business Park is not located within the
Redevelopment Project Area but is adjacent to it. Locating the City Administrative Offices
and Corporate Yard within the Business Park will help promote development of not only
the Business Park, but also the surrounding Redevelopment Project Area. On the other
hand, failure of the Business Park may result not only in economic decline within the Park
itself, but throughout the Redevelopment Project Area.
The estimated cost of constructing City Administrative Offices, a Corporate Yard and
abutting street and utility improvements is seven million dollars ($7,000,000). The
estimated cost of using Series 1993 bond proceeds, including interest payments, to pay
for the cost of this project is eleven million, five hundred and seventy-six thousand, three
hundred and nine dollars ($11,576,309) payable over twenty (20) years.
Agenda Report - City Administrative Offices
December 14, 1993
Page 3.
The City has no revenue sources which may commit to financing construction of this
project. According to the City's Fiscal Year 1994/95 Capital Improvement Plan, as
adopted by the City Council, the only other potential funding source for the project would
be development impact fees. However, these funds have already been earmarked for
other projects including Pala Road Park, Rancho California Sports Park Improvements, the
East Side Fire Station and Margarita Road Improvements. The 1993 Bond Series
represents the only available source for construction of the project. No other reasonable
means are available to finance the project,
It should be noted that after January 1, 1994, AB 1290 would prohibit redevelopment
agencies from funding City Halls or City Administrative Offices. On the other hand, it was
anticipated at the time the 1993 Tax Allocation Bonds were sold, that the bond proceeds
would be used for public facilities such as City Administrative Offices.
Accordingly, City Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the use of the Series
1993 bond proceeds for constructing City Administrative Offices and a Corporate Yard on
the property to be dedicated to the City within Tract 21383.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution of Approval
Summary Report
Map of Tract 21383
RF~OLUTION NO. 93.- ---
A RESOLIYrION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPRO ING ~ EXPENDITURE OF
TAX INCREMENT FUNDS BY THE R~nEV~LO~
AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TE1VIECULA FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
AND A CORPORATION YARD NORTH OF
WINCHESTER ROAD AND WEST OF DIAZ ROAD
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES I-IF~REBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds, determines and
declares as follows:
A. On or about February 23, 1993, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Temecula issued Series 1993, Tax Allocation Bonds in the mount of $17,355,000. The
proceeds of the Series 1993 bonds were to fund the acquisition, planning, design,
construction, improvement and equipping of various public facilities, including the City's
administrative offices and corporate yard. The debt service on the 1993 Series Bonds will be
paid with tax increment funds received by the Agency.
B. The City of Temecula anticipates acquiring Lots 20-25, 29, and 30 of Tract
21383, located north of Winchester Road and west of Diaz Road (the "Property"). The
Property is located adjacent to the Redevelopment Project Area. The Property will be
granted to the City on the condition that it be used for the construction and operation of City
administrative offices.
C. The City intends to construct its permanent administrative offices and
corporate yard on the property (the ("Project"). The Project will be of substantial benefit to
the Redevelopmerit Project Area in that it will allow the City to pwvide essential municipal
services to the residents throughout the Project Area not presen~y available, and provide an
aesthetic improvement to the area.
D. The Property is located within a business park that has gone through
foreclosure and which is in default on property taxes and assessments. Given the proximity
of the park to the Project Area, if the park should not develop, it will not only result in
blight within the park, but result in further economic deterioration and blight within the
Project Area. The Project will provide a significant impetus to development of the business
park and the Project area.
E. The Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1-1988 provides for
the installation and construction of public facilities which benefit the Project Area.
re,t~342 -1-
F. A Public Hearing in substantial compliance with the requirements of California
Health and Safety Code § 33679 has been held and Notice of the Hearing has been published
in a newspaper of general circulation in the community for at least two successive weeks
prior to the public hearing.
Section 2. Based upon the foregoing, the City Council of the City of Temecula
hereby determines that construction of the City's administrative offices and corporate yard is
necessary for the benefit of Redevelopment Project No. 1-1988 and that the proposed
contribution to their financing from Series 1993 Bonds is the only reasonable means available
to insure their construction and completion. The City has no other reasonable means
available to it to finance the Project. The existence of permanent City administrative offices
and corporate yard is essential to the welfare of the Project Area. The City Council does
hereby approve a contribution of $7,000,000 of 1993 Series Bond proceeds for construction
of City administrative offices and a corporate yard.
Section 3. City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVRr~ AND ADOPTE!~ this_ day of
ATTEST:
J. Snl Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[seal]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, I-IFRF. Ry DO CERTIFY that
the foregoing Resolution No. 93-._ was duly adopted and passed at a regular n~ceting of the
City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , 1993, by the foliowing roll
call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
SUMMARY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 33679 OF
THE CALIFORNIA COMIVIUN1TY ttEDEVELOPME~NT
LAW ON THE EXPENDITURE OF TAX INCRE1V~NT
FUNDS OF THE REBEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR
INSTALLATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF CITY
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES AND CORPORATE YARD
This Summary Report has been prepared by the Temecula Redevelopment
Agency ("Agency") pursuant to Section 33679 of the California Health and Safety Code.
This report sets forth certain details regarding the proposed expenditure of tax increment
funds for the construction of City administrative offices and a corporate yard (the "Project").
As required by Community Re, development Law, this Report sets forth:
1. An estimate of the mount of Agency tax increment funds proposed to
be used to pay for the land and construction of the Project, including interest payments;
2. The facts supporting the determinations required to be made by the City
Council pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445 regarding the necessity of using
tax increment funds to finance the construction of the Project; and
3. A statement of the redevelopment purpose served by using tax
increment funds to pay for the construction of the Project.
This Report is to be made available for public inspection prior to City Council
approving use of tax increment funds for the construction of the Project.
As
ESTIMATE OF THE AMOUNT OF TAXES PROPOSED TO BE USED
FOR THE PROJECT.
On or about February 23, 1993, the Agency issued Series 1993 Tax Allocation
Bonds in the mount of $17,355,000. The proceeds of these Bonds were intended to be used
to fund the acquisition, planning, design, construction, improvement and equipping of
various public facilities, including City administrative offices. These bonds will b'e repaid
with tax increment revenues. The maturity date of the Bonds runs from 1994 through 2013.
The interest rate varies from 5.25% to 5.50%.
The City proposes to construct its administrative offices and corporate yard on
land located north of Winchester Road and west of Diaz Road upon Lots 20-25, 29 and 30 of
Tract 21383. The estimated cost of constructing the Project, including the abutting street and
utility improvements, is estimated to be Seven Million Dollars ($7,000,000.00).
The estimated cost of using Series 1993 Bond proceeds, including interest
payments, to pay the cost of the Project is Eleven Million, Five Hundred Seventy-Six
Thousand, Three Hundred Nine Dollars (11,576,309.00), payable over twenty (20) years.
Be
NECESSITY OF USING TAX INCREMENT FUNDS TO FINANCE THE
PROTECT.
Health and Safety Code Section 33445 provides that before tax increment
funds may be used to finance public facilities, the City Council must make the following
findings:
That the building, facilities, structures, or other improvements are of
benefit to the Project area, or the immediate neighborhood in which the
Project is locate. d, regardless of whether the improvement is within
another Project area, or in case of a Project area in which substantially
all the land is publicly owned, that the improvement is a benefit to an
adjacent project ar~a of the Agency.
That no other reasonable means of financing of such buildings,
facilities, structures, or other improvements arc available to the
community.
The proposed sit~ for the City's Administrative offices and corporate yard is
located within a business park that is in substantial economic distress. The business park has
already been through foreclosure and is in default on its property taxes and special
assessments. The business park is located adjacent to the Redevelopmerit Project Area. The
location of the Project within the business park will help anchor the business park, and
promote development of the business park and of the surrounding Redevelopment Project
Area. Failure of the business park may result in not only economic decline within the park
itself, but throughout the Project Area.
The City presently leases its administrative offices and corporate yard. In
order for thc City to provide a full rangc of municipal services to the residents of thc Project
Area and the entire City, it is necessary that a permanent City office building and corporate
yard be constructed. The proposed site is to be granted to the City at no cost to the City.
Construction of permanent City facilities will enable the City to provide a full range of
municipal services to the residents of the Project Area and the City.
The City has no revenue sources which it may commit to finance the
construction of City Hall. According to the City's fiscal year 1994/95 Capital Improvement
Plan adopted by the City Council, the only other potential funding source for the Project
would be development impact fees. However, these funds have already been marked for
other projects including Pala Road Park, Rancho California Sports Park improvements, the
East Side Fire Station and Margarita Road improvements. The 1993 Bond Series represents
R:~CityAtty~lmiaolf. S~m 2
the only available sourc~ for construction of the Project. No other reasonable are means
available to the Project.
R~DEV~-LOPMF~NT PURPOSE FOR TIlE EXPENDITURE OF TAX
INCREMENT FUNDS FOR CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES.
As described above, the proposed site for the Project is located within a area
of substantial economic distress. Should this area continue to suffer economic decline, it is
likely to drag down the rest of the Project Area with it. Alternatively, by locating the City's
administrative offices and corporate yard within the business park, it is likely to provide
momentum for redevelopmerit of the s ' 'ect Area.
Dated: 11/29/93
DAVID DIXON, EXEC DIRECTOR
I~F-DEVELOP1V~-NT AGENCY
CITY OF TEMEC~A
R:~Ci~yAtty~a~o~.Sm 5
ITEM
20
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: City Manager
DATE:
December 14, 1932
SUBJECT: Election of Mayor
PREPARED BY: June S. Greek, City Clerk
RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor will entertain motions from the City
Councilmembers to select the Mayor to preside until the end of calendar year 1994.
BACKGROUND: The City Council selects a member to serve as Mayor
annually. This office is assumed at the first meeting of the City Council in January
and the newly elected Mayor presides through the calendar year of 1994.
ITEM NO.
21
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
City Manager
December 14, 1993
Election of Mayor Pro Tempore
June S. Greek, City Clerk
RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor will entertain motions from the City
Councilmembers to select the Mayor Pro Tempore who will assume the duties of the
Mayor in the Mayor's absence and will hold this office until the end of calendar year
1994.
BACKGROUND: The City Council selects a member to serve as Mayor Pro
Tempore annually. This office is assumed at the first meeting of the City Council in
January and the newly elected Mayor Pro Tempore presides through the calendar year
of 199r.
ITEM N O. 2 2
ITEM N O. 2 3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
December 3, 1993
Urgency Ordinance to Allow Property Clearance for Fire Protection Purposes
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council introduce and adopt an ordinance entitled
ORDINANCE 9~..._
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA PERMITTING CLEARING OF
BRUSH FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES
BACKGROUND:
The Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency has prepared a model Urgenby Ordinance
permitting property owners to conduct weed abatement and vegetation clearance within 100 feet
of structures to protect lives and property. This ordinance has been reviewed by the legal
counsel of the Conservation Agency and the Riverside County Fire Department. At the
suggestion of the Riverside County Fire Department. At the suggestion of the Agency, it has
also been reviewed by the City Attomey's office, specifically the environmental law section of
Burke, Williams & Sorensen. The City Attomey's office has added provisions to the Ordinance
providing that:
and,
It does not supersede the provisions of federal and state endangered species act;
2. It does not supersede any landscaping condition of any land use entitlement.
5\agenda.rpt~fireord 1
This Ordinance was prepared in response to the recent fires that occurred throughout Southern ~-~
California, including the nearby Winchester/~ ~lce. Skinner fire in which more than 25,000 acres
were burned, and thirty homes and seventy other sU'uctures were burned, and thirty homes and
seventy other structures were destroyed. These fires emphasize the need for weed abatement
and vegetation clearance to prevent future fires. The need for such fire control measures is so
apparenf that it is recommended that this Ordinance be adopted as an urgency matter.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHM'EN'I~:
Urgency Ordinance.
Memo from Habitat Conservation Agency and Draft Ordinance
5%agenda.rpt%~reord 2
ORDINANCE NO. 9~
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCH, OF
THE CITY OF 'TEMECULA PERMITTING CLEARING OF
BRUSH FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula (the "City Council") has
determined that it is in the best interests of the residents of the City of Temecula (the "City")
to permit persons to clear weeds, brush, and to remove and abate other fire hazards on their
property to protect human life from the threat of fire; and
WItEREAS, California Government Code Section 28123 provides that an ordinance
which is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety shall
take effect immediately; and
WIIEREAS, the City is subject to relatively low humidity levels and high temperatures,
as documented by the National Climatic Data Center; and
WHEREAS, dry weather and dry vegetation have contributed to the loss or damage of
life and property in other communities with similar climatic conditions similar to those in the
City of Temecula; and
WHEREAS, all of Southern California, including the City of Temecula, is exposed to
drought and Santa Ana winds which create dangerous conditions in the region and create a high
potential for fire damage; and
WHEREAS, these conditions have recently contributed to the loss and damage occurring
in numerous fires in Southern California in 1993, including the Winchester/Lake Skinner fire
in which more than 25,000 acres were burned, 30 homes and 70 other structures were destroyed,
and the Old TopangaJMalibu fires in which more than 18,000 acres were burned; 323 homes
were destroyed, and 3 lives were lost, in addition to other fires in the Beaumont/Cherry Valley
and Riverside areas and many other communities in Southern California: and
WHEREAS, weeds, brush, and other fire hazards in the vicinity of homes and other
structures pose a threat to human life in the event of fifes; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is necessary for the immediate preservation
of the public peace, health and safety to permit property owners to clear such conditions on their
own property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
as follows:
Section 1: Notwithstanding any other ordinance or resolution of the City to the
contrary, any person or entity that is an owner of property in the City may clear and abate
brush, weeds and other fire hazards for fire protection purposes on the owner' s property, unless
such vegetation or landscaping is required by condition of a land use enfi~ement, such as a
tentative tract map or plot plan. Weed, brush and other fire hazard abatement measures may
include, but are not limited to, disking, scraping, grubbing, mowing, or other methods of
5\ords~S9 I
clearing to bare ground. No measure or method which is dangerous or hazardous to human
health or safety shall be utilized, nor shall any activity which is contrax~ to any state or federal
law be permitted.
Section 2: Brush and other fire hazard abatement measures as provided in Section 1
may be taken within 100 feet of any structure, as defined in the Uniform Building Code (1991
ed.), regardless of whether such structure is located on one's own property or on adjacent
property without a permit from the City.
Section 3: The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to it
and shall within 15 days cause it or a summary of it to be published pursuant to Government
Code Section 36933. This ordinance shall tak~ effect immediately because it is an ordinance for
the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety. This ordinance begins with
recitals declaring the facts constituting the urgency, and is passed by at least a four-fifth's vote
of the City Council.
ADOPTED this day of ,1993.
ATFEST:
J. Sat Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
5XordaX59 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
CITY OF TEMECULA )
SS
I,-June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, I-IEl~RY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 93- was duly introduced and placed upon its fu'st reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , 1993,
and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting o.f the City
Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , by the following roll cal vote:
COUNCILMEMB~:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMB~:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
5\ords~59 5
~NUM-Z~-i995 15:58 ~UM COUNIY HUMIN UPSICE ~0 96941999 P.02
Rlvereide County Habitat Conserveion Agency
CEy gf Cara~. · Oey dHemet · OEy~lake esirere · C~ofMorena V,d~ · Ciey of Peni
Ciiy ~ I:~erside · ¢::}y of 1'erasouls · C~r~ ~f Rivereicle
VIA FACSIMII i= T!:~NSMI$.$1ON
RCHCA Board of Directors
TO:
FROM:.
SUBJECT:
EMERGENCY ORDINANCE TO ALLOW PROPERTY CLEARANCE FOR
FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES
On November 18, 1993 your Board directed staff to prepare an emergency ordinance
for ~ by :the goverffing bodies of all RCHCA members. The iment of the
ordinance is to allow property cemers to conduct whatever weed al:Nllernent and
vegetation oleararme is neK-4d~-::y within 100 feet of structume to protect lives and
property. Your Board further directed that the provisions of this ordinance would
supwsede any oordlicting local ordinance.
Attached is a model emergency ordinance prepared pursuant to your direcqivee. Due
to the .short tim available for preparation, this matedid has been reviewed enly by
RCHCA legl oounsml and the Riverside County Fire De~t. I would itrongly urge
you to'have this ordinance reviewed by your City Attorney and fire department prior to
its conidwalion by your governing body.
As a final note, although the Intent of your Board is to supme, de conflicting ordinances,
It muse be undmmood that no local ordinance can supersede the provisions of the
federal and state Endangered 8peoles Acts. This meaNre also wlll not protect from
liability property owners or public agencies which vim provtsions of lhose laws in the
exercise of weed abammeqt activities permitted under this ordi~.
With those cautionary notes in mind, ptease let me know if you would like · presentation
dudng your deliberations. Additionally, I would appreciate a copy of any ordinances
adopted. by your governing body concerning this matter.
4080 Lerna~ 81met, 12U't Rcx)r Riverlick, CA 92501
Tek,phane,' (me) ~,76--uoo Fax: (me) r/5-11o6
ITEM NO.
24
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
December 3, 1993
City of Temecula v. McDowell
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider approving the settlement agreement in
the action entitled City of Temecula v. McDowell in the amount of $1,760,422.15.
DISCUSSION: On May 26, 1992, the City Council adopted a Resolution of Necessity to
initiate a condemnation action on the property located at the south of Margarita Road and east
of Stonewood Road, Temecula, California 92591, owned by Eion McDowello The purpose of
the action was to acquire the property for purposes of constructing a park. Funding for the
purchase is being provided through Community Facilities District 88-12.
The condemnation action was filed on July 20, 1992. Prior to that time, the City had
provided Mr. McDowell with its appraisal indicating the worth of the property to be
$1,300,000.
In August of 1993, Mr. McDowell provided the City Attorney's office with two appraisals for
his property dated April 14, 1992 and May 28, 1992, indicating the value of it to be
$2,000,000. Since then, active settlement discussions have been conducted. between the
City and Mr. McDowell. Mr. McDowell now offers to settle the suit for $1,600,000 plus
reimbursement of Community Service District overcharges in the amount of $7,422.15.
Finally, Mr. McDowell has demanded that the settlement close by December 23, 1993;
otherwise a $300 a day penalty will be charged.
It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of Mr. McDowell's counter-offer.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for the settlement will be provided from Community Facilities
District 88-12.
ATTACHMENTS: Letter of October 6, 1993, from Samuel Alhadeff to Scott Field regarding
settlement.
Letter from S. Paul Bruguera to Samuel Alhadeff, dated October 26, 1993, containing
proposed settlement documents.
Letter from Samuel Alhadeff, Esq., dated November 18, 1993 setting forth counter-offer.
Memo from Beryl Yasinosky to Scott Field dated September 14, 1992, regarding TCSD
overcharges.
Memo from Eion McDowell to Samuel Alhadeff regarding TCSD overcharges.
Memo from Eion McDowell to City Council dated November 23, 1993, regarding settlement.
1Z/~I/S3 16:17
213 2362't00 BWaS LA HAIN
I, AW OI"IPICI~S
B~Fz. Wz~ & So~s~
Ill Wilt $IX~M 1~C~. $UI~I ~O
11131 U~
october 26, 1993
~ FAC2I]W "OJ.XGIIII~ r"TT-T~
,1'. Craig' Oohnson, Esq.
Lob'ins Ai.lmdeff ~axlnon & Role
550 west C Street, Xgth
Sen Diego, CA 92101-3540
Re: C4t, y Of ~wemmenlm V. KCDOV~l l
IN Idlllll~
( 213 ) 236-2819
02351-602
Dear Mr. aohnson:
Please tlnd enclosed the stipular/on for Judgment and
Znterlocutory Zudgeent reflecting ~J~e se~tlant for
million. Let us know if you have any comnts oi' if you require
any chan~;s by November 1, 1993 in order for ~he City council
take act n on our reco~mendation at ~he November 9, 1993 City
Council meeting.
When the Stipulation for Judgment is fully executed, we will
file it with the original InterlocutoL7 Judgment. Thereafter,
the City will issue the payment for which you will execute a
receipt to be filed. Finally, we will file end record a Final
order and audgment in Condemnation conveying title =o the City.
Thank you ~or your assistance in reaching ~his settlement
and I look totward to your prompt reply.
cc; Scott F. Field, Esq ·
... Ver~ truly yours,
S.~pA!JBRU~
Of BU~CE, WILLZAMS & SORENSEN
· e;)'f.J~. - 3.
09/34/93
13:37
1
2
5
6
7
8
10
SUPERIOR COED~ OF TEE S~a~_ OF CaLIiFOIQF~i
C0uR=~ OF ~vr~S~uE
L1
12
13
14
15
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
~ OF ~QfEC[]LA, & general Ltw
MGDOWK[LI ~ua'~ OF
)
)
)
)
)
.a ]xx~ a}rgxmr~te aug. politic; )
DOES I ttrough 100, Tn~-~n~Ve, )
17 AND I,T,T, l:a~]~M,,qO]i'~ UJiKIIU~,d~i . )
lS INORTOTJ~~BOUG~TO )
)
De&--a~nts. )
Caee ITO. 220838
~he parf/es, b~ area through theiT ~r-a _t:Eve e. ounsel of
stipulatm as follows:
~eAnswer~Cce~la~t ~~,mdX~*29,~92,~
Def~gt~F-NcDowelludClaraM.~)owell~ ~asha11~
/////
i1111
Ilill
Ilili
U~/~4/~ 14:54 il~O0~
I 4e,-m,-m sai4 ~e~auAmut~' txu~e~ tam the Ftz~c lme,u~mi
3 Date4: ~ .._., 3393 ~ _lTJ~n~lq~
&
5.
6
7
8.
9
10
12
13
14
:I.5
16
17
18
3o
2.m
22
23
24
25
36
27
28
Reel C,
,,T. ~
.l't'~o'r'--3rm for I)ei'eu, m_x'n'r.s EZ(M F.
2~1'W,' ~..~, 3.993 SCOff F. FJZ[,D,
:llO11~gr WT"r.T.Tslf~ r,
· : Sco'b'b F. Field
~S i'OZ' plm4ntif~ ~ OF
GOOD C~USE APPEAllING ','HeX-,~'-Olt, IN ~ ~ qq:m
STZPUIATIOI~' OF COUKSEL, IT IS r"<k"':'~ CrlmTmmen:
Irasurer tO the F'j..rs'C ~,~T~4e,,s Co~.la~n~' 'film IDx'y 3.'s., 3.993,
2, Clez'k o:E' tie CcmFt:: sa,ball -,,-: m, I:. for' f':Ll_incJ' ~ l:tz'crpez'ly
l:,~_pei-ed e.t-i. smxe nemcsz'axbium smz]mni.~ hi;' a l:;az't'y he**eto,
~ OF ~ SUPERlOll COUI~
0037038oI~/4
7384.1003/092493
-2-
LORBNZ ATHADS'F CANNON 6Z ROSE
Novembcz 18,/993
73;174;100t
Sc~.F.~E~-
· I~ C:ilT of Tt'tnez~ v. M~T)owcll
~ Scom
3- The _~m~, me~cm,.d hl pr~'~hs l and / shall be paid to Mr. McDow~on'
or befoxe fhh.t.~ (BID chys from Tnesdsy, Nomnber23, 1993:
LO~n~Z ALHAD~ ~ON & ROSE
Novcud,~ 18, 1993.
aria ir--lt~i,~ 10.'00 ~.m. Wc,~yo 1~1'u~,~,,., 24., ~ ~x ~ u~ ~w ~ Coun~ u~
mee~ az~ Tucsd~, November 23, 1993.
P.C., of
CANNON & ROSE
· SCA~s (c-~r~
CC: F:i~F. MCDOW~
T0 .'
FROM:
Scott Field
Shawn Nelson
Beryl Yasinosky
MEMORANDUM.
DATE:
'SUBJECT:
September 14, 1993
Eion McDowell Property;
921-300-006-5
20.23 acre vacant parcel, APN
On Monday, September 13th, I was called to the front counter to
speak with a gentleman by the name of Wayne Cobb, of Southwest
Brokers & Development Company. He told me that he was an agent for
Eion McDowell and was researching tax information on APN 921-300-
006. He showed me a copy of the TCSD rates and charges for FY
1992-93 that were levied on this parcel. He stated that the
property was zoned residential but was being assessed by the TCSD
as co~tercial.
I informed Mr. Cobb that I would research the information he had
given me, however, the appeal period for the TCSD rates and charges
expired on September 1st. I also informed him that a public
hearing notice is mailed to each property owner every fiscal year
for review of the proposed TCSD charges for their parcel, but that
it was up to the property owner to contact the TCSD regarding any
disagreement with these charges. He was insistent about appealing
the charges so I did give him anappeal formwith the understanding
that if a change is deemed appropriate it may not take effect until
next year. He asked if I would check our records to see what the
TCSD rates and charges had been for prior years. I informed him I
would look up this information and respond back to himby the end
of the week.
I spoke with John Meyer and confirmed that the property is zoned
for residential purposes. I reviewed the levy rolls f6r TCSD
assessment information and found that this parcel received the
rates and charges for vacant coL~Lercial property for fiscal years
1990-91, 1991-92, 1992-93, and also for 1993-94. I also found in
my "pending appeals file" for FY 1992-93 a note that stated I had
sent Mr. McDowell an appeal form on December 23, 1992, however, the
appeal was never returned.
The following information identifies the TCSD charges that APN 921-
300-006 actually received at the non-residential (vacant
commercial) rate, and the comparative vacant residential rate:
(FY 1990-91)
Svs/Parks
(no service Level A)
Commercial
$2,702.73
Residential
$1,351.36
LORENZ A V HADEF~ CANNON & ROSE
1~ Citv of Temm~ v. McDowelI
Dear
.a.ssis~ to make the ~ a _z~_~j, for the ci~izms of
FIELD SCOIT ESq
003
LORENZ ALHAD~ CANNON & ROSE
LORI~!Z ,AT~rA.D]EI~ CANNON & ROSE
co: 'EkmF.)clt
'-i
:(
(FY 1991-92)
Svs/Parks
Service Level A
(FY 1992-93)
Svs/Parks
Service Level A
(FY 1993-94)
Svs/Parks
Service Level A
Commercial
$4,037.88
$ 279.66
$4,716.02
$ 336.62
$5,195.06
$ 346.62
Residential
$2,018.95
$ 139.99
$2,358.82
$ 169.12
$2,597.54
$ 169.12
~ & ~ E.F. McDOWEI,I,,
42600 PRADEIIA WAY
TEMECI. II ~, CA -9~-~g~
4--9~ THU
.I
,=7e~. 8" I 'Y ,
FAX 674-1999
FLFJ~I DELIV~. a~ SOON a2 I,O2SIBE~.
TKIkNI YOUII
11/23/93
It has c~ne to my a~tentton, that my attorney
did not include a $300.00 a day penalty, beyond
the stated thirty-day closing of escrow.
My attorney is out of town at this time, and
unable to be reached, therefore please include
this item in my settlement agreement.
Sincerely,
Bion MCDOwe11
emcd
ITEM
25
DEPARTMENTAL
'REPORTS
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
APPROVAL:
CITY MANAGER ~.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official ~
December 14,1993
Building and Safety November 1993, Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
DISCUSSION:
The following is a summary of activity for November 1993:
Building Permits Issued ............................................ 174
Building Valuation ......................................... $6,255,994
Revenue Collected .............................. ........... 956,302.83
Housing Starts ................................................... 49
New Industrial Starts ................................ I = 126,147 Sq. Ft.
Commercial Additions/Alterations ........................ 12 -- 22,602 Sq. Ft.
Building Inspections ............................................ 1,947
Agenda Report
V:%WFtAGENDA.REI~NOV'g3.Rpt
November 23, 1993
Page 2
Code Enforcement Actions ......................................... 384
Active Cases Pending ............................................. 120
Closed Cases .................................................... 64
V:%WRAGENDA.REIN~OV'93.Rpt
~.- M'rVcI/6A ~
M- 7V3
S- ~IVD OHDNV'cI
gI-I =IO
I-~ MA~O.~. CFIO
1>
o
<
0
[.-
CITY OF TENIECULA
CODE ENFORCE1vIBNT
MISCELLANEOUS COMPLAINTS
TOTAL
TRASH & DEBRIS
AlYrO REPAIR
CONDUCTING BUSINESS WITHOUT A
LICENSE
SIGN VIOLATIONS
(NOT INCLUDING SIGNS REMOVED FROM PUBLIC PROPERTY)
DWELLING IN A VEHICLE ON PUBLIC
PROPERTY
DISPLAYING MERCHANDISE FOR
SALE ON PUBLIC PROPERTY
,111
ANIMAL & FOWL VIOLATIONS
ZONING VIOLATIONS
Wb, P~D~
TOTAL
3
120
SIGNS REMOVED FROM
PUBLIC PROPERTY
TOTAL
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER ~
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
.,
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Gary Thornhill, Director of Plannin~
December 14, 1993
Monthly Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and File
Discussion:
The following is a summary of the Planning Department's
caseload and project activity for the month of November 1993:
Caseload Activity:
The department received 9 applications for administrative cases and I public hearing
cases for the month of November. The following is a breakdown of case type for
public hearing items:
Plot Plan I
Ongoing Projects:
Old Town Soecific Plan: Staff continues working with the Old Town Merchants
Association and the Temecula Town Association to set up a Main Street
organization for Old Town. The Plan will be scheduled for City Council review
in January 1994.
Development Code: A draft code is being reviewed by the Development Code
Advisory Committee. The committee has met four times and met again on
December 2nd. A joint Planning Commission/City Council workshop will be
scheduled in early January.
French Valley Airoort: A preliminary draft of a portion of the Airport Facility
Master Plan for French Valley Airport has been sent to the City for review.
Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance A public workshop to review the draft
ordinance was held on November 24, 1993. This item will be scheduled for a
public hearing before the Planning Commission in February.
R:~S~MONTHLY.RPT~1993~NOV.93 12/7/93 vgw 1
Temecula Regional Center SPeCifiC Plan and Environmental Impact Reoort: This
Specific Plan was presented at a Planning Commission Workshop on May 4,
1992. The Commissioners gave direction to the applicant and staff. This
Specific Plan went to a DRC meeting January 5, 1993. Staff is awaiting
submittal of additional information. Environmental Impact Report 340 prepared
for the Temecula Regional Center was approved by the Planning Commission
on June 21, 1993 and certified by the City Council on July 13, 1993.
Winchester Hills and CamDos Verdes Specific Plans and Environmental Imoact
Reoorts: These Specific Plans were discussed at a Planning Commission
Workshop on May 4, 1992. The Commissioners gave direction to the applicant
and staff. The Notice of Completion for the Campos Verdes EIR went to State
Clearinghouse July 10, 1992. Both of these Specific Plans went to the DRC
meetings on January 5, 1993. Staff is awaiting submittal of additional
information.
Murdv Ranch Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Reoort: This Specific
Plan was presented to the Planning Commission at a Workshop on April 6,
1992. The Commission provided Staff and the applicant direction relative to
design issues. The applicant has incorporated these changes into the Specific
Plan. This Specific Plan will be scheduled for a Planning Commission meeting
upon completion of the Development Agreement and the Congestion
Management Plan.
Johnson Ranch Soecific Plan: The Specific Plan has been to a Development
Review Committee meeting and is currently being amended to incorporate
staff's comments.
Attachments:
1. Count & Valuation Summary by Type - page 3
2. Revenue and Status Report - page 4
R:%S%MONTHLY.RFl'%1993%NOV.93 12/7/93 vgw 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
COUNT AND VALUATION SUMMARY BY TYPE
NOVEMBER 1993
R:%S~,MONTHLY.RP'r%1993%NOV.93 1212/93 vow 3
REPT155
12/02/93 12:42
COUNT & VALUATION SUMMARY BY'TYPE
Subtotal: Cnstr Type
Dat Range i 11/01/93
T~B (Select):PLAN
Thru 11/31/93
NOVEMBER 1993
Date Type: 1
A/P/D Type
A PLANNING CASE-6/9/93
Construction type
PHASING MAP-LND DIVUNT
MINOR/MAJOR EVENT/PROFIT
MINOR EVENT - NON PROFIT
PRCL MAP-COMM IND W/IMP
PLOT PLAN ADMINISTRATIVE
Count Sq Feet
1 0
5 0
1 0
1 0
2 0
10 0
TOTAL ** 10 0
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
REVENUE STATUS REPORT
R:%S\MONTHLY.RFl"~1993~NOV.93 1212,'93 vgw 4
REVPRIN2
12/01/'''~ 14:30:47
001 GENERAL FUND
161 PLANNING
ACCOUNT #
DESCRIPTION
4101
4102
4103
4104
4105
,
4107 ·
4110
4111
4112
4113
4115
4116
4117
4118
4119
4120
4121
4122
4-123
4124
4125
4126
4127
4128
4129
4130
4131
4132
4133
4134
4135
4136
4137
4138
4139
4140
4141
4142
4143
4144
4145
4146
AHENDED FINAL NAP
APPEALS
CERT. OF LAND DIV. COlqPLIANCE
EXTENSION OF TIll)
SINGLE FilLY TRACTS
NULTI-FNIILY TRACTS
PARCEL NAPS
LOT LINE N)JUSTMENT
MINOR CHANGE
PARCEL ll)RGER (2-4 LOTS)
RECORDABLE SUBDIVISION NAPS
REVERSION TO ACREAGE (5+LOT$)
SPECIAL SERVICE LETTER
SECOND UNIT PERKITS
CHANGE OF ZONE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
CONSISTENCY CHECKS
GENERAL PLAN ANENDll)NT
PLOT PLAN
PUBLIC USE' PERHIT
REVISED PERHIT
SETBACK ADJUSTMENT
SPECIFIC Pt. AN
SUBSTANTIAL CONFORNANCE
TEHORARY OUTDO(I EVENT
TEMPORARY USE PERHIT
VARIANCE
ZONING INFORMATION LETTER
CEQA (INITIAL STUDIES) ;::.~ .... :.
CEQA ENVIROMENT IMPACT REPORT
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
GEOLOGY CEQA
GEOLOGY ORD, 5474PZ
LAFCO
PARCEL NAP/MAIVER
MERGER
AMENDED F]RAL TRACT/PAR, NAP
CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
CONDO TRACT NAP
REVERSXON TO ACREAGE
LOT REVISION AFTER CHECK
LOT LINE ADJUST. PLAN CHECK
CERT, OF CORRECT, PLAN CHECK
CERT, OF C01PLIANCE PLAN CHECK
COND, CRRT. OF CONPL, PLN, CK,
CERT, OF PAR, lERGER PLAN CK
CITY OF TEMECULA
REVENUE STATUS REP(IT
NOVEMBER 1~
ADJUSTED
ESTIMATE
.00
.00
.00
.OG
.OG
.00
.00
.OG
.00
.OG
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
150,000.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
NOVEMBER
REVENUE
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.OG
.00
.00
.00
.OG
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
REVENUE
.00
975.00
1,272.13-
2,577.00
18,~.00
.00
1,~Z8.00
1,810.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
2,746.00
.00
.00
3,fi)7.00
500.00
.00
2,351 .OG
.00
571
18.00
3,704.35
4,200.00
.00
.00
:00
.00
.DO
.O0
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
BALANCE
.00
975.00-
1,272.13
2,577.00-
18,466.OG-
.00
1,97.8.00-
1,810.00-
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
2,7~.00-
9,985.00-
.00
.00
149,295.25
3,707.00-
273.00-
500.00-
.00
2,351 .OG-
40~.00-
.00
571.00-
18.00-
3,70~.35-
4,200.00-
.00
.00
.00
.OG
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
PAGE 1
0.5
REVPIRfN2
001
161
ACCCMiT #
&1~7
~148
~1~9 .,
~150
~151
~152.,
4262
4369
14:)0:4.7
GENERAL FUND
PLANNING
DESCRIPTXOll
VACATIONS PLAN
DOCUMENT PROCESSING
C:QNDEHNATIOli PLAN CHECK:
REVERSION TO ACRE. PLAN CHECK
PARCEL HAP PLAN CHECk:
TRACT IMP PLAN CHECK
ANENDED NAP PLAN CHECI(
4TH & MS. SUI4fTTALS
FF, J4A STUDY REVE EV
LOHA REVIEV
DRA)RAGE STLI)Y REVIEV
Ii4PROVE INSPECTZ0H GO-SITE
K-RAT STUDY FEES
FAST TRAGIC PLANNING
FORHA FAST TRACK
IN HOUSE PLAN CHECKS
ANNEXATIGO FEES
TEHPO RARY USE PERI41T
ACCESSORY MIND ENERGY
LARGE FANILY DAY CARE
HAZARDM MASTE FACILITY
LAND DTV UNIT 14AP
LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK
PLANNING
CITY Of TEHE(:LlLA
REVENUE STATUS REPelIT
NOVEJ4BER 19g~3
ADJUSTED
ESTilMTE
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.OO
.00
.00
.O0
.OO
.OO
.0O
.00
.00
.00
.00
150,OOO.OO
.00
.OO
.00
187.QQ
270.00 -'
REVENUE
.QQ
.QO
.QO
374.00
6,135.QQ
62,37'6.97'
BALANCE
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
1,960.00-
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
374.QQ-
6,135.QQ-
PA~2
ZCOL
41.6
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAl
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
/l~'~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
December 14, 1993
Public Works Monthly Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly
Activity Reports for November, 1993.
p w 15~egdrpt%9 3% 1214%rnoectrpt
LAND DEVELOPMENT
Monthly Activity Report
Special Projects
November, 1993
Submitted by: Tim D. Serlet
Prepared by: Raymond A. Casey
F. EMA/OES REIMBURSEMENT:
Staff is continuing to coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the
State Office of Emergency Services (OES) representatives in seeking reimbursement for costs
incurred by the City due to the January 1993 floods and ensuing disaster declaration. There is
nothing significant to report since last month.
LIEFER ROAD/BRIDGE:
The cost of the project is estimated to be $188,000. The City will be reimbursed $20,000 from
RCWD for the waterline relocation and up to 93.75% of the remaining costs from FEMA and OES.
i~other remaining 6.25% shall be funded through the proposed Zone "R" assessment for Liefer
I improvements. To date we have received $3,000 from OES.
As of December 6, 1993, the construction on Liefer Road has begun.
All amounts are approximate.
pwO5\moactrpt~dev~november 120793
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT'PROJECTS
Monthly Activity Report
November, 1993
r~/-,~bmitted by: Tim D. Serlet
WORK UNDER CONSTRUCTION:
Ynez Road:
The Contractor is in the process of completing the final items of work, including
striping, restoration of the landscape and irrigation and site clean up.
CRC:
The Contractor has completed applying the exterior finish to the multipurpose room
and center gallery area. The deck around the pool has also been completed and the
water slide has been installed. The Contractor will be working on items to close in the
buildings, including installation of the remaining doors and windows. Work on the
landscape and irrigation is also on going.
Riverton Park:
Construction of the park is nearing completion in accordance with the project
schedule. The 120 day maintenance period is anticipated to begin on December 10,
1993. Construction of the park monument sign will begin when the dedication date
has been established.
Jefferson Avenue Storm Drain:
The project is 100% complete and a recommendation for acceptance will go to City
Council on January 11, 1994.
Pala Community Park:
The Notice to Proceed was issued to the contractor, Martin J. Jaska, Inc. on
November 29, 1993. The construction contract is for 270 calendar days. Rough
grading operations are expected to commence the week of December 6, 1993 and
schedule to last approximately 3 1/2 weeks.
pw 15~noectrpt\cip%november 121493
Pujol Street Iml~rovements:
The contract was awarded to IPS Services at the November 23, 1993 City Council
meeting. A pre-construction meeting will be scheduled in approximately two (2)
weeks to allow IPS Services to execute the contract documents.
PROJECTS UNDER DESIGN:
Sports Park Slope Repair:
The improvement plans and appropriate specifications and bid documents have been
completed. A recommendation is being made to the Board of Directors of the
Temecula Community Services District at the December 14, 1993 meeting, to
authorize the solicitation of bids for construction. The bid opening is expected to be
held the first part of January, 1994.
Margarita Road Sidewalk Improvements:
Construction documents and specifications are being prepared for sidewalk
improvements on the east side of Margarita Road between Rancho Vista Road and
Pauba Road. This project will be constructed with SB821 funds.
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
Liefer Road, John Warner Road. Santiago Road and Walcott Corridor:
Staff has prepared a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Professional Engineering Services
to prepare plans and specifications for the required road improvements. Proposals are
to be submitted to the City by January 6, 1994.
p w I $~rrtoeotrpt~oip~november 121493
TRAFFIC DIVISION
Monthly Activity Report
For November, 1993
Submitted b.~Tim D. Serlet
Prepared by: Marry Lauber
Date: December 14, 1993
II.
TRAFFIC RFnUESTS
TRAFFIC REQUESTS: Sept Nov
Received 4 7
Completed 11 1
Under Investigation 2 6
Scheduled for Traffic Commission 2 3
ON GOING PROJECTS:
Completed final draft taxi-cab ordinance to be brought back to Public/Traffic
Safety Commission December 9, 1993 for final comments and recommendation
to City Council.
B. Traffic signals.
1. Margarita Road/Avenida Barca - Reviewing Contract.
2. Nicolas Road/Winchester Road - Reviewing Contract Draft.
S.R. 79(s)/Margarite Road Incorporating Caltrans field review
comments signing and striping changes.
Safe Route to School Committee - Completed traffic investigation and made
recommendations for operational improvements for High School and adjacent
roadways.
Received preliminary approval of traffic control device inventory grand from the
Office of Traffic Safety.
E. Review traffic operations along Ynez Road Corridor.
pw 15%moectq~t\traffic\november
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
~f/~ Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
December 14, 1993
Monthly Activity Report - November 1993
The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division
in-house personnel for the month of October, 1993:
II.
III.
IV.
SIGNS
A. Total signs replaced
B. Total signs installed
C. Total signs repaired
TREES
A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street
sweeping concerns
POTHOLES
A. Total square feet of potholes repaired
CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins cleaned
RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
A. Total locations
A. Total S.F.
VI.
25
46
17
32
53
156
328,790
17
4,171
Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 27 service order requests ranging from weed abatement,
tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings.
This is compared to 27 service order requests for the month of October, 1993.
The Maintenance Crew has also put in 72 hours of overtime which includes standby time, P.M.
surveillance (weekends only), and response to street emergencies.
-1 - pwO5\roads~actrpt%93%11 1206
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - November, 1993
Page 2
ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING AND STENCILING COMPANY has completed the followino:
· 1,532 L,F. of new and repainted striping
· 0 L.F. of sand blasting
· 0 L.F. of red curb
· 96 new and repainted legends
The total cost for Orange County striping service was $2,479.40 compared to $0.00 for October,
1993.
The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of November, 1993
was $139,032.68 compared to $105,971.98 for the month of October, 1993.
Account No. 5402
Account No. 5401
$60,244.68
$78,788.00
CC:
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development
Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer
-2-
pwOS~roads~ectrpt%93%l 1 1206
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT- October, 1993
Page 3
STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS
The following contractors have performed the following project for the month of July.
HOUSTON HARRIS PIPE CLEANING
Account No. 5401
Date: November 16, 1993
44115 Highlander
Hydro wash and video pipe inspection 183' of 15" R.C.P. for failures.
NELSON PAVING
Account No. 5402
Date: November 11, 1993
TOTAL COST: $1,080.00
Shoulder grade Pala Road E/S between Loma Linda & Wolf Valley. Shoulder grade Pala Road
E/S between Wolf Valley Road and City limit.
Approx. 200,000 sq. ft.
TOTAL COST: $1,600.00
Account No. 5402
Date: November 11, 1993
28516 Pujol
Shoulder grade existing channel and North to 6th Street coming from driveway across from
28516 Pujol. _
TOTAL COST: $675.00
-3- pwO5~roeds\actrpt~,93~11 1206
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - October, 1993
Page 4
Account No. 540~
Date: November 11, 1993
La Serena
Shoulder grade La Serena W/B North side Calle Medusa to Elem. School. Fill-area with
suitable native material. Sweep approx. 1,000 x 5' asphalt sidewalk. Shoulder grade
approx. 19,000 sq. ft.
TOTAL COST: $875.00
Account No. 5409
Date: November 11, 1993
Rancho California Road @ Margarita
Saw cut existing asphalt paving from street area and dispose of legally. Replace
removed sections with new asphalt materials. Additional area was required to be
removed and replaced in order to properly correct existing problem. Asphalt that was
removed and replaced varied in thickness from 6" to 8".
Total A.C. 32 Tons
Total S.F. 1,100
TOTAL COST: $3,807.00
Account No. 5402
Date: November 15, 1993
Vallejo Avenue
Repair roller curb in area approx. 47 ft. Install new asphalt rolled curb i~ area approx.
20 ft. Overlay road way with asphalt materials to construct 11' x 5' x 3" area. Crack
seal using hot rubberized crack sealer in two different street areas totaling approx.
3,400 In. ft.
Pauba Road 300 ft. West of La Prima Vera
Remove and replace 36 In. ft. of concrete curb and replace with asphalt material to form curb
contour.
Total A.C. 4 Tons
Total S.F. 111
TOTAL COST: $4,104.00
-4- pwO5~roads%ectrpt%93~l 1 1206
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - October, 1993
Page 5
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
Account No. 5402
Date: On-going
Via Lobo Channel
45 hours of water truck for newly installed landscaping
Account No. 5401
Date: November 15, 1993
28841 Vallejo
Installed 4 12" CMP's to replace existing 18" CMP for drainage.
Account No. 5402
Date: November 18, 1993
31070 Avenida Del Reposo
Install oversize drain and add back fill
Account No. 5402
Date: November 22, 1993
Diaz Road between Rancho California Road and Avenida Alvarado
Shoulder grade R.O.W. for safety concern
TOTAL COST: $2,995.00
TOTAL COST: $2,955.00
TOTAL COST: $1,950.00
TOTAL COST: $2,300.00
pwO5%roads~ectrpt~93%l 1 1206
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - October, 1993
Page 6
Account No. 540~
Date: November 19, 1993
South General Kearney 300' S/O La Serena Way
R & R A.C. Failures
Total S.F. 2,771
Total A.C. 48 Tons
TOTAL COST:
$3,900.00
Account No. 5401
Date: November 2, 1993
John Warner Road
Excavate and Import approx. 2,000 CY'S of fill. Install 3 36" x 40' CMP at locations & grout
for backfill. Furnish and install rip-rap grouted with 5 sack at inlet and outlet of CMP's.
Desiiting Pond -
2 hours D-6H @ 95.00
16 hours labor @ 38.00
Headwall - 25 tons rip-rap
Grout rip-rap, 10 yards @ 53.
Misc. grout, 10 yards @ 53.
TOTAL COST: $25,887.00
Account No. 5401
Date: November 3, 1993
Remove debris and silt and grade channel on Nicholas Road west of Roripaugh Road.
Account No. 5401
Date: November 3, 1993
Diaz Road 1500' S/O Sarah Way
Remove debris and silt from channel
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL COST:
$1,950.00
$950.00
pwOS\roeds~actrpt~93~l 1 1206
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - October, 1993
Page 7
Account No. 5402
Date: November 8, 1993
North General Kearney between Margarita Road and La Colima Road
Shoulder grade shoulder approx. 11600 S.Fo for drainage
Account No. 5401
Date: November 5, 1993
Santiago E/O Vallejo
Construct three desilting ponds per City specifications.
rip-rap.
TOTAL COST: $950.00
Clean culverts and place additional
TOTAL COST: $9,700.00
K.L.M. ENGINEERING
Account No. 5402
Date: November 22, 1993
Del Rey Road, Avenida Del Reposa and Felicita Road
R & R A.C. failures and 6" berm
Total S.F. 1,711
Total A.C. 24.5
TOTAL COST:
$8,048.00
D.R. SCHMIDT CONTRACTORS
Account No. 5401
Date: November 22, 1993
Via Lobo Channel
Clear channel of all weeds, debris and silt build-up
Total S.F. 2,920
TOTAL COST:
$3,426.00
-7-
pwO5~roads\ectrpt~93~11 1206
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - October, 1993
Page 8
Account No. 5409
Date: November 19, 1993
Progressive concrete: Mergerira Road S/O Winchester Road and Mira Loma N/O Rancho Vista
Installed stamped concrete on median islands.
Total S.F. 2,920
Total P.C.C. 36 Yards
TOTAL COST: $11,741.00
Account No. 540~
Date: November 3, 1993
Rainbow Canyon Road I miles S/O Pala Road
Ae
B.
C.
D.
E.
Remove approx. 25 sq. ft. AC down spout
Excavate area 165' x 5'x for swale
Build 165' x 5'x concrete swale
Build downspouts approx. area of 20' x 16'
Build shoulder/swale area of 65' x 10'
Total S.F. 825
Total P.C.C. 10 yards
TOTAL COST:
$4,535.00
Account No, 5401
Date: November 8, 1993
Calle De Velardo 200' N/O J. Smith Road
Clean and reconstruct two desilting ponds per City specifications.
Account No. 5402
Date: November 15, 1993
Rainbow Canyon Road from Pala Road to City Limits.
Total S.F. 1,150
Total A.C. 3 Tons
TOTAL COST:
Filled potholes with A.C.
TOTAL COST:
$4,400.00
$2,500.00
-8-
pwOS~road$%ectTpt%93~l I
1206
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - October, 1993
Page 9
Account No. 5401
Date: November 17, 1993
Vallejo Channel between Santiago and Ynez
Place rip-rap, grout and patch existing rip-rap
Total P.C.C. 20 Yards
DEL RIO CONTRACTORS
Account No. 5402
Date: November 2, 1993
Via Norte East and West of Calle Pir~a Colada
R & R 120 I.f. of 6" A.Co berm
Overlay 3,600 s.f. of A.C. for drainage
Total S.F. 3,720
Total A.C. 42 Tons
Account No. 5402
Date: November 2, 1993
30475 Del Rey Road
R & R 45 i.f. of 6" A.C. Berm
Total L.F. 45
Total A.C. 2 Tons
Account No. 5402
Date: November 3, 1993
30495 Via Norte
Overlay curbline and A.C. downspouts
Total S. F. 3,900
Total A.C. 43 Tons
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL COST:
$9,385.00
$4,412.68
$1,219.75
$4,672.25
-9-
pwO5\roads~actrpt%93% 11 1206
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - October, 1993
Page 10
OAKRIDGE LANDSCAPE
Account No. 5401
Date: November 2, 1993
Landscape Via Lobo Channel plus 90 days of maintenance
TOTAL COST: $5,819.00
pwO5%roedeXaetrpt%93~11 1206
11-01-93
11-02-93
11-02-93
11-02-93
11-03-93
11-04-93
11-08-93
11-09-93
.09-93
11-10-93
11-10-93
11-12-93
11-12-93
11-12-93
11 ~16-93
11-16-93
11-17-93
11-19-93
11-19-93
11-19-93
11-22-93
11-23-93
~-tl-23-93
I LOCATION
40540 La Cadena Court
30249 Mira Loma Drive
30025 Levande Place
41041 Via Halcon
Calle Bahia Vista ~ R. Calif. Rd.
30475 Del Rey
Loma Linda Park
Via Eduardo L~ Jeronimo
45327 Esmerado Court
42421 Cosmic Drive
41740 Asteriod
31411 De Portola Road
41890 "B" Street
30260 Cabrillo Avenue
31070 Ave. del Reposo
30059 Corte San Luis
30485 Deer Meadow Road
Main Street @ Front Street
Rancho Calif. Rd. @ Margarita
Diaz ~ Rancho California Road
31086 Camino del Este
Starlight Ridge
40395 Calle Fiesta
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
NO VEMBER 1993
SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG
IREQUEST
Trash pick-up concern
Sweeper concern
Sweeper concern
Tree limb down
Graffiti
Water Leak
Graffiti
Graffiti
Trash pick-up concern
Tree trimming
Root pruning
Drainage concern
Tree limb hanging
Request repaving
Request A.C. curb
Tree trimming
Trash concern
Purse dropped in storm drain
Glass in travel lanes
Hole in R.O.W.
Graffiti
Sweeper concern
Erosion problems
I WORK COMPLETED
11-01-93
11-02-93
11-02-93
11-02-93
11-03-93
11-04-93
11-08-93
11-09-93
11-09-93
11-10-93
11-10-93
11-12-93
11-12-93
11-12-93
11-16-93
11-16-93
11-17-93
11-19-93
11-19-93
11-19-93
11-22-93
11-23-93
11-24-93
-1-
pwO3\roedelwkcmpltd%93%11.1201c*
SERVICE ORDER REQUEST - November, 1993
11-29-93
11-29-93
11-30-93
11-30-93
31455 Corte Montiel
30858 Wellington Circle
40201 Starling Street
No address
Tree trimming
Sign repair
P.C.C. removals
Trash/Sweel~er concern
11-29-93
11-29-93
11-30-93
11-30-93
TOTAL SOR'S 27
-2-
pwO3%ruedslwk~:mpltd~93'~11.12019
J j:)ATE
11-01-93
11-01-93
11-01-93
11-01-93
11-02-93
11-03-93
)4-93
11-04-93
11-04-93
11-04-93
11-04-93
11-08-93
11-09-93
11-10-93
11-10-93
11-16-93
11-16-93
11-17-93
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
NO VEMBER 1993
LOCATION
Pujol e J. Moraga
Main Street Bridge
Vallejo Channel
J. Moraga ~) 6th Street
Santiago ~) "C" Street
Margarita N/O De Portola
6th Street L~ Front Street
3rd ~i~ Mercedes
Main ~ Mercedes
Rancho Vista ~) High School
La Serena W/O Elementary
School
Rainbow Canyon Road
Bridge
Jefferson N/O Winchester
Ynez and Winchester
Nicholas S/O N. Gen'l Kearney
Santiago e) First Street
De Portola ~ Del Sur
Pujol Street N/O 6th Street
WEED ABATEMENT
i WORK COMPLETED
Abated 50 S.F.
Abated 250 S.F.
Abated 2,200 S.F.
Abated 1,000 SoF.
Abated 250 S.F.
Abated 2,000 S.F.
Abated 3,200 S.F.
Abated 1,700 S.F.
Abated 250 S.F.
Abated 300 S.F.
Abated 100 S.F.
Abated 100 S.F.
R.O.W. Weeds
R.O.W. Weeds
R.O.W. Weeds
R.O.W. Weeds
R.O.W. Weeds
R.O.W. Weeds
R.O.W. Weeds
R.O.W. Weeds
R.O.W. Weeds
R.O.W. Weeds
R.O.W. Weeds
R.O.W. Weeds
Abated 19,350 S.F.R.O.W. Weeds
Abated 2,500 S.F.R.O.W. Weeds
Abated 250 S.F.R.O.W. Weeds
Abated 2,000 S.F.R.O.W. Weeds
Abated 100 S.F.R.O.W. Weeds
Abated 6,300 S.F.R.O.W. Weeds
- 1 - pwO3%roed,,%wkcmpltd~l 1 .Wee 12029;
Weed Abatement- November, 1993 (Continued)
11-29-93
11-30-93
Rancho Calif. Road between
Kaiser Parkway and Margarita
Margarita between. Rancho
Calif. Road and La Serena
Abated 182,490 $.F.
Abated 104,400 S.F.
R.O.W. Weeds
R.O.W. Weeds
TOTAL S.F.R.O.W. WEED ABATEMENT 398.790
-2- pwO3~,roede%wkcmpltd%11 .Wee 12029
I DATE
· 11-01-93
11-04-93
11-04-93
11-04-93
11-05-93
11-06-93
11-08-93
!~J-08-93
', ,-09-93
11-15-93
11-15-93
11-15-93
11-16-93
11-16-93
11-17-93
11-22-93
11-22-93
LOCATION
Elinda @ Via Canada
Calle Bahia Vista @ Rancho Calif.
Road
Pio Pico @ Amarita
Loma Linda Park
Pala Road Channel
Pala Road Channel
Loma Linda @ El Torito
Rainbow Canyon @ Channel
Jeronimo @ El Torito
R. Calif. Road W/O Asteriod
Rancho Vista @ Calle Rio Vista
Rancho Vista @ Ave. de la Reina
La Serena Way @ Chardonnay
Hills
Amarita Way and Pio Pico
31023 Corte Alamar
31086 Camino del Este
La Serena Btwn Camino Corto and
Via Puerta
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
NO VEMBER 1993
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
WORK COMPLETED
Removed
Removed
3 S.F. of Graffiti
336 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 28 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 12 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 1,785 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 1,675 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 4 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 147 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 20 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 5 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 12 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 26 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 18 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
30 S.F. of Graffiti-
9 S.F. of Graffiti
55 S.F. of Graffiti
6 S.F. of Graffiti
TOTAL LOCATIONS 17
TOTAL S .F. 4, 171
-1-
pwO3\roede%wkcmpltd%93%l 1 .Graffiti 12029:
DATE
11-01-93
11-02-93
11-08-93
11-10-93
11-12-93
11 - 17-93
11-22-93
11-23-93
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
NO VEMBER 1993
I LOCATION
Pala Road $10 Gilberto
Mira Loma ~i) Rancho Vista
Front Street S/O Rancho
California Road
Calle Medusa N/O Riverton
42421 Cosmic
Pujol Street NIO 6th Street
6th Street E/O Pujol
Ave. Barca ~ Margarita
TREE TRIMMING
I WORK COMPLETED
Trimmed 2 trees
Trimmed 3 trees
Trimmed 5 trees
Trimmed 2 trees
Removed 1 down tree
Removed 15 trees
Trimmed 2 trees
Trimmed 2 trees
TOTAL 32 trees trimmed
pwO3%roade~wkcmpltdt.93%11.trt 12029:
-DATE
11-01-93
11-02-93
11-02-93
11-08-93
11-08-93
11-08-93
08-93
11-09-93
11-09-93
11-10-93
11 - 10-93
11-10-93
11-15-93
11-16-93
11-22-93
11-22-93
11-23-93
11-23-93
-23-93
I11-23-93
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
NO VEMBER 1993
SIGNS
LOCATION
Pujol S/O Main Street
Mira Loma ~l) Rancho Vista
Margarita N/O La Serena
Rancho Calif. Rd. Between Margarita
and La Colima
Front ~ Santiago
Rainbow Canyon ~ Cupeno
Front Street N/O Plaza del Rio
John Warner Road
Jefferson N/O Winchester
Nicholas S/O Winchester
Jedediah Smith Le) Cabrillo
Pala Road {i) Huron, Via Edwardo
Via Gilberto and Murfield
Joseph Road and Nicholas
Avenida de la Reina
Margarita S/O Winchester
Nicholas Road N/O Calle Medusa
WORK COMPLETED
Replaced W53A R-2 "50" Old
Installed R-1 & $.N.S.
Replaced W-41 (Relocate)
Replaced R-l, 2 R-7, 2 R-7A (Knock-
downs)
Repaired 8 Signs
Installed 4 Carsonites
Replaced R-48 (Faded)
Installed 12 Carsonites
Replaced R-250 & Hwy. Patrol Sign
Replaced W-41 Old
Replaced "N" and W-56
Replaced 4 R-l's Old
Replaced R-1 Knock-down
Replaced 2 "N" Markers (Graffiti)
Repaired 8 "L" Markers R-7A
Installed 7 Carsonites
Rainbow Canyon Road 1.5 miles N/O
Pala Road
Pauba Road @ Margarita
Rancho Vista ~ Margarita
Margarita @ Solana Way
Installed 2 W-14 and 2 W-71
Installed 4 R-1-A
Replaced R-26 D (Knock-down) .
Installed 2 R-1 (New 3M Diamond Grade)
pwO3~'oads%wkcm;itd'~93%egn 12029
11-24-93
11-24-93
11-24-93
Margarita N/O Hwy. 79
Margarita ~) Solana Way
Parks (Various)
Installed 4 R-2 "50"
Replaced 3 R-1
Installed 7 "No Smoking"
TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED
TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED
TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED
25
46
17
~DATE
11-01-93
11-02-93
11-03-93
11-04-93
11-08-93
)9-93
11-10-93
11 -15-93
11 - 16-93
11-16-93
11-16-93
11-18-93
11-22-93
11-23-93
CITY OF TEMECULA
LOCATION
Area #2 (See daily for
locations)
Area #2 (See daily for
locations)
Area #2 (See daily for
locations)
Area #2 (See daily for
locations)
Area #3 (See daily for
locations)
Area #3 (See daily for
locations)
Area #3 (See daily for
locations)
Area #3 (See daily for
locations)
De Portola ~i) Jedediah Smith
De Portola @ Pio Pico
Area #1 (See daily for
locations)
June Court
31271 Vista Alhambra
Area #3 (See daily locations)
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
NO VEMBER 1993
CA TCH BASINS
I WORK COMPLETED
Cleaned and secured 23 Catch BaSins
Cleaned and secured 22 Catch Basins
Cleaned and secured 10 Catch Basins
Cleaned and secured 2 Catch Basins
Cleaned and secured 10 Catch Basins
Cleaned and secured 27 Catch Basins
Cleaned and secured 19 Catch Basins
Cleaned and secured 6 Catch Basins
Cleaned and secured
Cleaned and secured
Cleaned and secured
2 Catch Basins
1 Catch- Basins
5 Catch Basins
Cleaned and secured I Catch Basin
Cleaned and secured I Catch Basin
Cleaned and secured 27 Catch Basin
TOTAL CATCH BASINS
CLEANED AND SECURED
156
- 1 - pwO3%roede~wkcmpltd%93%11 .CB 120293
/
/
~ ==. g g g g g~ gR g g
om~ o
OtU
m a_ z z ~
o
~ I~ w a a ..-Im=- .e.o... -
,- m~a. ...za: a
o,,¢1i ~ w ¢: wwO¢
0 ~ m: ZZ 0 ~ -r
0 Ow
z o .~ ~ 5 ~ '~ ~ m w ~OOw
~ o .~ z z z = wu_=. ~,
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES
DISTRICT
ITEM
1
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
General Manager/Board of Directors
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
December 14, 1993
Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1993 and the Statement of
Revenues, Expenditures end Changes in Fund Balance for the Three Months
Ended September 30, 1993
RECOMMENDATION: The Board of Directors receive and file the Combining
Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1993 and the Statement of Revenues,
Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Three Months Ended September
30, 1993.
DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited activity of
the TCSD for the three months ended September 30, 1993.
Please see the attached financial statements for analytical review of financial activity.
ATTACHMENTS:
Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1993
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balance for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1993
I-.
I.U m r'-'~
n,,. ~ r.f--r
u.I m 4-,
(/>
~ ~ :=u,
I.U ~'
(D
f-
4~
~D
~ DO [,,,
ITEM
NO.
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Community Services Board of Directors
FROM:
David F. Dixon, General Manager
DATE:
December 14, 1993
SUBJECT:
Solicitation of Construction Bids for the Sports Park
Slope Repair Project (PW93-06).
PREPARED BY: ~ Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer- Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize
the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the Sports Park Slope
Repair Project(PW93-06).
BACKGROUND:
During last January's storms, severe erosion occurred along the fill slope below Margarita
Road at the Sports Park. The storms also damaged sections of a channel that meanders
through the park. On May 27, 1993 the Department of Public Works solicited proposals for
professional design services for the reconstruction and repair of the slope and improvements
to the channel.
Plans, specifications and bid documents have been completed and the project is ready to be
advertised for construction bids. The project includes the over-excavation and reconstruction
of the slope, the installation of landscaping and an irrigation system on the newly constructed
slope, and the excavation and reconstruction of the channel. The engineer's estimate for the
slope repair is $135,079; for the associated landscaping and irrigation is $42,600; and for the
channel improvements is $140,040.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project is being funded through Fund Balance in the TCSD - Community Services, Parks,
and Recreation budget. The slope repair and channel improvement portions of the project are
eligible for reimbursement from the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA). The
original reimbursement estimate prepared by FEMA in conjunction with the City is $6,513 for
the slope repair and $46,132 for the channel improvements.
pwl 3%agdrpt%93%1214%pwS3-06.bid 1203
ITEM
NO.
3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ,~
FINANCE OFFICER ·
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Community Services Board of Directors
Dave Dixon, General Manager
December 14, 1993
Award of Professional Services Contract for Materials Testing During the
Construction of Pale Community Park (PW93-03CSD).
PREPARED BY:
(~Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer- Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors Award a Professional Services Contract to Geotechnical &
Environmental Engineers, Inc. (GEE) to provide material testing services during the
construction of Pale Community Park, Project No. PW93-03CSD, in an amount not to exceed
$21,210 and authorize the President to execute the contract.
BACKGROUND:
On October 26, 1993, the Board of Directors awarded the construction contract for Pale
Community Park to Martin J. Jaska, Inc. The contractor was issued a notice to proceed on
November 29, 1993. It is anticipated that construction will begin during the week of
December 6, 1993.
As noted in the approved specifications, the City is responsible for providing material testing
services. The scope of services to be provided for this project include, but are not limited to
the observation of rough grading, masonry construction, and foundation preparation. GEE will
also provide testing of concrete and masonry units, reinforcing steel, asphalt paving, and soil
compaction.
GEE was selected from the City's qualified consultant list for professional services.
Consultants are selected on a rotating basis for each project. A project specific scope of
services is developed with a fee not to exceed the negotiated contract amount.
-1 - pwO9%egdrpt~93~1214~palapk.psc 1214
FISCAL IMPACT:
The construction project is being funded by Development Impact Fees ($3,010,000) and CFD
88-12 ($350,000). Funds for material testing services will be drawn from account number
210-190-120-5804. The materials testing service contract is in the amount of $21,210.
Attachment:
1. Professional Services Contract
-2- pwO9%agdrpt%93%1214%pelepk,pec 1214
AGREEMENT
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 14th day of December, 1993,
between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and
Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers, Inc., s California corporation, hereinafter referred to
as "Consultant".
e
The parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached
her·to. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in
Exhibit "A".
PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best
of his ability, experience and talent, parform all tasks described herein.
PAYMENT. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the hourly rates set
forth in Exhibit "B" attached her·to, based upon actual time spent on the above
tasks. This amount will not exceed $21,210.00 for the total term of the
Agreement unless additional payment is approved by the City Council; orovided that
the City Manager may approve additional payments not to exceed ten percent
(10%) of the Agreement, but in no event more than $10,000.
Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices
shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of
receipt of each invoice.
SUSPENSION. TERMINATION OR ABANDONMENT OF AGREEMENT. The City
may, at any time, suspend, terminate or abandon this Agreement, or any portion
hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice.
Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under
this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. Within thirty-five (35) days
after receiving an invoice from the Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for
work done through the date that work is to be ceased pursuant to this section.
If the City suspends, terminates or abandons a portion of this Agreement such
suspension, termination or abandonment shall not make void or invalidate the
remainder of this Agreement.
BREACH OF CONTRACT. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under
the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue
compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Default
shall include not performing the tasks described herein to the reasonable
satisfaction of the City Manager of-the City. Failure by the Consultant to make
progress in the performance of work her·under, if such failure arises out of causes
beyond his control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, shall not be
considered a default.
2/forms/ARG-04 Rev 1122/92 -1- pwO1%agmte~naetere%04 010493
e
If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant defaults in the
performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the
Consultam with written notice of the default. The Consultam shall have ten (10)
days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering
a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultam fails to cure its default
within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding .any other
provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and
without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity
or under this Agreement.
TERM. This Agreement shall commence on December 14th, 1993, and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described her. in are completed, but in no event
later than December 14th, 1994.
Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between
the City and the Consultam arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall
be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final.
Consultam shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired
judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration
hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section
1280, ~)t seo. City and Consultam shall share the cost of the arbitration equally.
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the event
of termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, all original
documents, designs, drawings and notes prepared in the course of providing the
services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property
of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without
the permission of the Consultam.
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The Consultam is and shall at all times remain as
to the City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor any of its officers,
employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of the Consultant or any
of the Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as herein set forth. The
Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its
officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of
the City.
No employee benefits shall be available to Consultam in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall
not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing
services her. under for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or
indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing
services her.under.
LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultam shell keep itself informed of State and
Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or
in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The
Consultam shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations.
2/forme/ARG-04 Rev 1122192 -2- pwOl%egmts%maeter8%04 010493
10.
11.
12.
The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity
occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section.
NOTICF. Whenever it shall be necessary for either party to serve notice on the
other respecting this Agreement, such notice shall be served by certified mail,
postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the City Manager of the
City of Temecula, located at 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula , California
92590, and the Consultant at 27431 Enterprise Circle West, Temecula, Califomia
92590 unless and until different addresses may be furnished in writing by either
party to the other. Notice shall be deemed to have been served seventy-two (72)
hours after the same has been deposited in the United States Postal Services. This
shall be valid and sufficient service of notice for all purposes.
ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement,
nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without the prior written
consent of the City.
Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be the
value to the City of the services rendered.
LIABILITY INSURANCE. The Consultant shall maintain insurance acceptable to the
City in full force an effect throughout the term of this contract, against claims for
injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection
with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, his agents,
representatives, employees or subcontractors. Insurance is to be placed with
insurer with a Beets' rating of no less than A:VII. The costs of such insurance shall
be included in the Contractor's bid. The Consultant shall provide the following
scope and limits of insurance:
A. Minimum Scooe of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
Insurance Services Office Form No. GL-0002 (Ed. 1/73) covering
Comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office Form No.
GL-0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability; or
Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
("occurrence" Form No. CG-0001).
Insurance Services Office Form No. CA-0001 (Ed. 1/78) covering
Automobile Liability, Code I "any auto" and Endorsement CA-0025.
o
Workers' Compensation insurance as required by Labor Code of the
State of California and Employers' Liability insurance.
4. Errors and Omissions insurance.
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits of insurance no
less than:
General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for
bodily injury and property damage.
2/forms/ARG-04 Rev 1122/92 -3- pwO 1%agmte~neetere%04 010493
Ce
De
Automobile Liability; $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for
bodily injury and property damage.
e
Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability: Workers'
Compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of California
and Employers' Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident.
4. Errors and Omissions Insurance: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductible in excess of $1,000
must be declared to and approved by the City.
Other Insurance Provisions. Insurance policies required by this contract shall
contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be
endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided,
canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after
thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City via United States First
Class Mail.
be
General Liability and Automobile Liabilitv coveraaes. The City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as
insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on
behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the
Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant, or
automobiles owned, lease, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The
coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection
afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
With regard to claims arising from the Consultant's performance of the
work described in this contract, the Consultant'a insurance coverage
shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained
by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall apply in
excess of, and not contribute with, the Consultant's insuEance.
Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shall
not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers officials, employees
or volunteers.
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to
the limits of the insurer's liability.
Worker's Compensation and Emolovers' Liability Coveraae. The insurer
shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work
performed by the Consultant for the City.
2/formelARG-04 Rev 1122192 -4- pwOl%egmte%meetere%04 010493
Verification of Coveraoe. Contractor shall furnish the City with
certificates of insurance affecting coverage required by this clause. The
certificates for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person
authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The
certificates are to be on forms provided by the City and are to be
received and approved by the City before work commences. The City
reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required
insurance policies, at any time.
Consultant shall include all subconsultants as insureds under its policies
or shall furnish separate certificates for each subcontractor. All
coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements
stated herein.
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and
approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall
reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as
respects the City, its officers, officials and employees; or the Consultant
shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related
investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
13.
LICENSES. The Consultant and subconsultant shall obtain all necessary licenses,
including but not limited to City Business License.
14.
INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless the
City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all
claims, demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the
City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be
imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising
out of Consultant's negligent performance under the terms of this Agreement,
excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City.
15.
ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached
hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or
incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the
subject matter hereof.
In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this
Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement
shall prevail.
EFFECTIVE DATE AND EXECUTION: This Agreement shall be effective from and
after the date it is signed by the representatives of the City. This Agreement may be
executed in counterparts.
2/forrns/ARG-04 Rev 1122/92 -5- pwOl~gmta%mesZers~)4 010493
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hareto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and .year first above written.
CONSULTANT
CITY OF TEMECULA
Prin~ Name and Title
2743~ Enterprise Circle W~
Temecula, CA g2~
By
J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
2/formelARG-04 Ray 1122/92 -6- pwO1 ~egmteVnaetere~4 010493
Mr. Dennis Armstrong
City of Temecula
December 6, 1993
Page 2
EXHIBIT '~"
SCOPE OF SERVICES
ROUGH GRADING CONTROL
Observation and Testing - Rough Grading (Full Time)
· Level II Technician (140 hrs @ $47/hr) ........................ $6,580.00
· Engineering Inspection (4 hrs @ $55/b.r) ........................$220.00
· Travel and Vehicle ...................................... No Charge
Trench Backfill Testing (Part Time - On Call)
· Level II Technician (30 hrs @ $47/hr) ......................... $1,410.00
Parking Area Subgrade, Base & Asphalt Density Testing(3 Visits/4 hrs per Visit)
· Level II Technician (12 hrs @ $47/hr) .......................... $564.00
Temecula Lane Rough Grade
· Level II Technician (30 hrs @ $47/hr) ......................... $1,410.00
Temecula Lane Subgrade, Base & Asphalt Densities
· Level II Technician (12 hrs @ $47/hr) .......................... $564.00
Foundation Inspection, Buildings
· Senior Technician (4 hrs @ $55/hr) ............................ $220.00
Foundation Inspection, Light Standards
· Senior Technician (2 hrs @ $55/hr) ............................ $110.00
Steel Reinforcement Inspection
· Deputy Inspector (Shrs @ 47/hr) .............................. $376.00
Mr. Dennis Armstrong
City of Temecula
December 6, 1993
Page 3
~IBIT "A"
Page 2
Concrete Inspection, Light Standards, Cast Cylinders and Slump Testing
· Level II Technician (6 hrs @ $47/hr) ........................... $282.00
Masonry Inspection (full time per UBC)/Casting Concrete Cylinders and Grout Prisms
· Deputy Inspector (120 hours @ 47/hr) ......................... $5,640.00
Laboratory Testing
· Maximum Density (4 tests @ $100 each) ........................ $400.00
· Compressire Strength Testing
· Concrete Cylinder 6X12 (30) ............................ $540.00
· Grout Prisms (24) cutting not included ..................... $432.00
· Mortar Cylinders 2X4 (6) .............................. $108.00
· Reinforcing Steel
· Tensile Strength (4) ................................... $252.00
· Bend Strength (4) .................................... $252.00
Final Compaction Report Preparation ..................... Lump Sum $1.850.00
Total ............................ $21,210.00
The costs outlined are based on anticipated work schedules. Manpower requirements and
fluctuations in project schedules are anticipated, and actual costs will accrue on a time and
materials basis in accordance with the attached 1993 Geotechnical Fee Schedule. Should
rough grading extend beyond the estimated 15 working days, there will be additional charges
for required field services. Invoices will be accompanied by a spreadsheet itemizing the
budget, costs to date and balance to complete.
This Proposal. our Standard of Provisions (two pages) and the attached 1993 Geotechnical
Fee Schedule represent the contract between you, the Client, and GEOTECFINICAL &
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, INC.. the Consultant. If the contract meets with your
approval, please indicate your acceptance by signing and returning one copy of the executed
contract for our files.
Please understand that our'price for the above-mentioned work will be honored for a period
of 90 days. After 90 days, we reserve the right to revise our price.
Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers, Inc.
ENVIRONMENTAL FEE SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE JANUARY, 1993
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Principal Engineer / Geologist I Hydrogeologist ........................................ $100.00 Per Hour
Associate Engineer I Geologist / Hydrogeologist ....................................... $92.00 Per Hour
Senior Engineer / Geologist I Hydrogeologist ........................................... $85.00 Per Hour
Senior Environmental Assessor ..................................................... $83.00 Per Hour
Project Engineer I Geologist / Hydrogeologist .......................................... $70.00 Per Hour
Project Environmental Assessor ..................................................... $64.00 Per Hour
Staff Engineer I Geologist / Hydrogeologist ............................................ $60.00 Per Hour
Staff Environmental Assessor ....................................................... $55.00 Per Hour
Field Director .................................................................. $50.00 Per Hour
Senior Technician ............................................................... $48.00 Per Hour
Technician ~ ................................................................... $45.00 Per Hour
Technician I ................................................................... $40.00 Per Hour
Draftsperson ................................................................... $38.00 Per Hour
Clerical ....................................................................... $38.00 Per Hour
Pick-up and Delivery ............................................................. $24.00 Per Hour
SPECZAL EQUIPMENT
On-Site Vehicle Charges ........................................................... $4.00 Per Hour
Field Groundwater Sampling Equipment ............................................... By arrangement
Organic Vapor Meter ............................................................. $100.00 Per Day
Interface Probe .................................................................. $60.00 Per Day
Other Environmental Equipment ..................................................... By arrangement
Geophysical Equipment ........................................................... By arrangement
TERMS OF PAYMENT
Invoices rendered for professional services are due upon presentation. A service charge of 1.5 percent per month may be charged
on accounts not paid within 30 days to cover additional processing and carrying costs. Any attorney's fees or other costs incurred
in collecting any delinquent account will be paid by the clienL
An overtime charge of 33.3% of hourly rates will be added for time in excess of 8 hours per day (excluding travel) and time before
7:00 a.m. and after 5 p.m. or on Saturdays. An overtime charge of 50% will be charged for time in excess of 12 hours per day and
on Sundays or legal holidays. Charges for travel to or from project are free up to a maximum of 1/2 hour each way. All travel time
in excess of 1/2 hour each way will be charged at straight time.
27431 Enterprise Circle West · Temecula CA 92590 TEL (90% 676-8337 · FAX (90% 676-4583
ITEM
NO.
4
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
City Manager
December 14, 1993
Election of President
PREPARED BY: June S. Greek, City Clerk
RECOMMENDATION:
of calendar year 1994.
Conduct election of TCSD President to preside until the end
BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Services District selects a
member to serve as President annually. This office is assumed at the first meeting of
the Community Services Distict in January and the newly elected President presides
through the calendar year of 1994.
ITEM
5
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
City Manager
December 14, 1993
Election of Vice President
PREPARED BY: June S. Greek, City Clerk
RECOMMENDATION: Conduct election of TCSD Vice President to preside until the
end of calendar year 1994.
BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Services District selects a
member to serve aiVice President annually. This office is assumed at the first meeting
of the Community Services Distict in January and the newly elected Vice President
presides through the calendar year of 1994.
ITEM NO.
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY :~,
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
David F. Dixon, General Manager
DATE:
December 14, 1993
SUBJECT:
Loma Linda Park Improvements - Phase II
PREPARED BY: ,~+
RECOMMENDATION:
Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant
That the Board of Directors:
Appropriate $225,000 from Quimby Fees to the Capital Projects Account for the construction
of Loma Linda Park - Phase II.
DISCUSSION: On August 27, 1991, the Board of Directors accepted the
donation of 2.9 acres of park land within Tract No. 19872 from H.R. Remington and
Silverwood-Temecula. On September 14, 1992, the Community Services Commission
approved the master plan for the development of Loma Linda Park. Although the City
obtained clear title to the Remington property, the Silverwood property was encumbered by
several liens that precluded the City from improving the entire site. Subsequently, the
development of Loma Linda Park was divided into two phases. Phase I of Loma Linda Park
(the Remington property) was completed and formerly dedicated as a public park facility on
July 8, 1993.
The liens that effected the Silverwood property have now been removed and the grant deed
has been recorded, thereby giving clear title of this property to the City. Thdrefore, staff
would like to proceed forward with the completion of Phase II of Loma Linda Park.
In the City's Capital Improvement Program for FY 1994-98, Quimby Fees were not designated
for any park projects. Therefore, staff is requesting that $225,000 in Quimby Fees be
appropriated for the development and completion of the second phase of Loma Linda Park.
Improvements to this portion of the park will include installing an irrigation system, planting
of grass and landscape improvements, installing concrete walking paths, and establishing
additional tot lot and picnic areas within the site.
Actual development and construction of the site will begin subsequent to the appropriation
of funds for this project and completion of the public bid process.
FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost for the design and construction of Phase II of
Loma Linda Park is estimated at $225,000. It is requested that $225,000 be transferred from
the Development Impact Fund (Quimby Fees) to the Capital Projects Fund and appropriated
in account 210-190-134-5804.
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORT
APPRO~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
David F. Dixon, General Manager
December 14, 1993
Departmental Report
PREPARED BY.' Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services
DISCUSSION: Staff has been working with the Temecula Museum Foundation to
determine a permanent location for the Temecula Museum. The Museum Foundation
requested to construct the museum facility and rehabilitate the church building at Sam Hicks
Monument Park utilizing the $500,000 budgeted in the City's Redevelopment Agency. In
return, the museum will provide access from Moreno Road to the Senior Center as e part of
the project's improvements. Further, the Museum Foundation has stated that no additional
rent monies will be requested from the City if the museum can be constructed at the park.
This request was approved by the Board of Directors on November 9, 1993. Staff has
scheduled a Project Committee meeting for December 7, 1993 to determine the design
components for this project.
The City has issued a Notice to Proceed for the Pala Community Park Project. It is hoped that
construction will begin on this park site during the week of December 6, 1993.
The Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park located in the Presley Development has completed the
90 day maintenance period. A park dedication has been tentatively scheduled, for Monday,
January 24, 1994 at 10:00 a.m.
The construction of Paloma Del Sol Park is completed. This park consists of two
lighted ballfields with soccer overlays, restroom/snack bar facility, and parking improvements.
The City is currently working with Kemper Development Company, the developer who
constructed the park, to determine the proposed dedication date for the site. It is hoped that
this situation will be resolved in the near future.
Phase II of the Community Recreation Center (CRC) Project is moving forward at an excellent
pace. Staff is now working with the CRC Foundation to determine equipment and furniture
needs for the CRC. It is anticipated that the CRC will be completed in January, 1994, with
a dedication date tentatively scheduled for February, 1994.
r:.%a%agendas~leptOO2.edn 111693
The Board of Directors selected the firm of J. F. Davidson Associates Inc. to provide the
design services for the Rancho California Sports Park Improvement Project, A Project
Committee comprised of members from the Board of Directors, Community Services
Commission, skateboarders and Teen Council members will assist in developing a design for
the skateboarding area, The first Project Committee meeting is scheduled for Thursday,
December 9, 1993 at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall.
The construction of Riverton Park began on September 27, 1993. Construction is now
underway with most of grading now completed. It is anticipated that the park construction
will be completed in December, 1993, and ready for dedication in April, 1994.
Staff has met with the Temecula Town Association to execute a lease agreement for the
Northwest Sports Complex in the near future. The approval of this lease will be considered
by the Community Services Commission at the January or February Commissior~ meeting.
Staff was able to obtain a right of entry letter from the property owner adjacent to Loma Linda
Park to abate weeds that were on this site. Staff is planning on moving forward with
improving this area and finishing the park site once clear title is obtained. This item will be
considered by the Board of Directors on December 14, 1993.
rAa%agenda,,%deptOO2.sdn 111663
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM
1
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICE~
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Redevelopment Agency Members
FROM: Executive Director
DATE: December 14, 1993
SUBJECT: Election of Chairperson
PREPARED BY: June S. Greek, City Clerk
RECOMMENDATION: The Chairperson will entertain motions from the members
of the Redevelopment Agency to select the Chairperson to preside until the end of
calendar year 1994.
BACKGROUND: The Redevelopment Agency selects a member to serve as
Chairperson annually. This office is assumed at the first meeting of the
Redevelopment Agency in January and the newly elected Chairperson presides
through the calendar year of 1994.
ITEM
NO.
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Redevelopment Agency
FROM:
General Manager
DATE:
December 14, 1993
SUBJECT: Election of Vice Chairperson
PREPARED BY: June S. Greek, City Clerk
RECOMMENDATION: The Chairman will entertain motions from the
Redevelopment Agency Members to select the Vice Chairperson who will assume the
duties of the Chairperson in his/her absence and will hold this office until the end of
calendar year 1994.
BACKGROUND: The Redevelopment Agency selects a member to serve as
Vice Chairperson annually. This office is assumed at the first meeting of the
Redevelopment Agency in January and the newly elected Vice Chairperson presides
through the calendar year of 1994.
ITEM
NO.
3
APPROVAL
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
December 14, 1993
Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1993 and the Statement
of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Three
Months Ended September 30, 1993
RECOMMENDATION: The Agency
Balance Sheet as of September 30,
Members receive and file the Combining
1993 and the Statement of Revenues,
Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Three Months Ended September
30, 1993.
DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited
activity of the Redevelopment Agency for the three months ended September 30,
1993.
Please see the attached financial statements for analytical review of financial activity.
ATTACHMENTS:
Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1993
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balance for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1993
>-
I,,IJ
(!,) IJ, Ir'-~
C
~Z 0
0
o
I,.,
s._.
ITEM
NO.
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY '
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
STAFF REPORT
TO:
Redevelopment Agency/Executive Director
FROM:
General Counsel/Finance Officer
DATE:
December 14, 1993
SUBJECT:
Disposition and Development Agreement, Property Exchange and Lease
Agreement by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula
and the Donna L. Reeves Trust UTD 7-25-90 for the Properties Located at
27500 Jefferson Road and 26744 Ynez Road
RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency approve the Resolution approving the Disposition
and Development Agreement, the § 1031 Exchange Agreement, and Lease Agreement
between the Agency and Reeves regarding the properties located at 27500 Jefferson Road
and 26755 Ynez Road, subject to approval by the General Counsel as to the final form of the
Agreements.
DISCUSSION: The Donna L. Reeves Trust U.T.D. 7-25-90 ("Reeves") owns an
automobile sales and service center located at 27500 Jefferson Road, known as Honda of
Temecula. In order to expand its business, Reeves proposes to relocate its oilsrations to a
site on Ynez Road. Reeves further proposes to purchase the Mazda/Acura automobile sales
and service center located at 26755 Ynez Road, and expand its operation. Agency Staff
anticipates that this will result in a substantial increase in taxable sales by both dealerships,
thereby increasing City revenues. Reeves also proposes to lease back the Jefferson site for
one year at ~20,000/month in order to phase its relocation to Ynez Road.
In order to facilitate these transactions, it is recommended that the
Redevelopment Agency acquire the Ynez Site, exchange it for Reeves' Jefferson Road
property, and lease it back to Reeves for one year for $20,O00/month. In summary, the
transactions would be as follows:
Transaction 1: The Redevelopment Agency would purchase the real property
located at 26755 Ynez Road, with tax increment funds. The purchase price is $1,000,000
subject to a $1,000,000 trust deed.
RDA Agenda Report - D&D Agreement - Donna L. Reeves Trust
December 14, 1993
Page 2.
Transaction 2: The Agency would exchange the 26755 Ynez Road property
with Reeves for the 27500 Jefferson Road property. This would amount to an I.R.C. t 1031
exchange, enabling Reeves to defer its tax gain on the sale of the Jefferson site.
Transaction 3: The Agency would lease back to Reeves for one year at
$20,000/month the 27500 Jefferson Road property to be used as an automobile sales and
service center.
Transaction 4: The Agency and Reeves would enter into a Disposition and
Development Agreement ("DDA") to operate the 26755 Ynez Road property as an automobile
sales and service center for a minimum of five years.
The effect of these transactions will be that the Agency will acquire the
Jefferson Road property for $2 Million Dollars. The Agency has obtained its own appraisal
of the Jefferson and Ynez Road properties. This appraisal indicates that the fair market value
of the Jefferson Road property is $2 Million Dollars. A copy of the appraisal is on file with
the City Clerk in the City of Temecula and is available for public review. A more detailed
summary of these transactions, as required pursuant to Section 33433 of the California
Redevelopmerit Law, is attached to this report.
These transactions will be accomplished through the following documents:
A. The ~ 1031 Agreement to acquire and exchange the Ynez property for the
Jefferson property: This document includes Transactions I and 2.
B. The lease of the Jefferson property for twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) per
month for twelve (12) months. This document accomplishes Transaction 3.
C. The Disposition and Development Agreement, requiring Reeves to own and
operate the Ynez property as an automobile sales and service center for a minimum of five
years. This Agreement would accomplish Transaction 4.
The effect of these transactions is to encourage economic development within
the Redevelopment Project Area, specifically the auto mall. The transactions are all for fair
market value and there is no subsidy from the Agency to any private party. Accordingly, it
is recommended that the Agency approve the three agreements.
FISCAL IMPACT:
$2 Million Dollars in tax increment funds will be expended by the Agency to acquire the
Jefferson Road property. An additional $5,000 will be paid by the Agency for miscellaneous
closing costs.
R:~Agende. Rpt%Honda.RDA 2
RDA Agenda Report - D&D Agreement - Donna L.. Reeves Trust
December 14, 1993
Page 3.
The Agency will receive $240,000 from Reeves pursuant to the Lease. By relocating Reeves'
Honda operations to Ynez, 25% of the sales tax revenues from the dealership will become
subject to the Sales Tax Agreement for CFD 88-12.
Twenty-five percent (25%) of the sales tax revenue generated by automobile sales and service
from Honda after it is relocatad to Ynez Road will be reimbursed to the property owners
located in CFD 88-12 pursuant to the Sales Tax Agreement for that district.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution of Approval
Summary report regarding DDA
Excerpt from appraisal for 26755 Ynez
Jefferson Road
Development and Disposition Agreement
§ 1031 Exchange Agreement
Lease Agreement
Road and 27500
R:~Agerde. Rpt%Honde. RDA 3
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 93- ~"
A RF~OLUTION OF THE ]~Er}EVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A
DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGI/EEMRNT, A
PROPERTY EXCHANGE AGItEEMENT AND A LEASE
BY AND BETWEEN THE I~RDEVl~J~O~ AGENCY
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE DONNA L.
REEVES TRUST U.T.D. 7-25-90
WHEREAS, the Donna L. Reeves Trust, U.T.D. 7-25-90 ("Reeves") currently
operates an automobile sales and service center, known as Honda of Temecula, at 27500
Jefferson Road;
WIIERE,I,S, Reeves proposes relocating its operations to the auW mall located along
Ynez Road;
WHEREAS, Reeves further proposes to acquire the Mazda/Acura dealership located
at 26755 Ynez Road and expand it;
WHEREAS, it is anticipated that the relocation of the Honda dealership to Ynez
Road and the expansion of the Mazda/Acum dealership will encourage the economic growth
of the auto mail, which is located within the Project Area;
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula pwposes to enter
into following transactions:
Purchase the propony at 26755 Ynez Road, Temecula, with tax increment
funds for $1,00000, subject to a $1,000,000 trust deed;
(2)
Exchange the property located at 26755 Ynez Road with Reeves for real
property located at 27500 Jefferson Road subject to a $1,000,000 trust deed;
(3)
Lease back to Reeves for one year at $20,000 per month the Jefferson Road
property to be used as an automobile sales and service center;
(4)
Enter into a Disposition and Development Agreement ("DDA") with Reeves to
operate the 26755 Ynez Road property as an automobile sales and service
center for a minimum of five years.
WHEREAS, the effect of the purchase of the Ynez property and the exchange of that
property for the Jefferson Road property is that the Agency will be paying $2,000,000 for
the Ynez Road property, which is consistent with the fair market value of the Ynex Road
property as determined by an independent appraisal obtained by the Agency;
NOW T!~XREFORE, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula hereby
approves and authorizes the Chairperson. to execute the Exchange Agreement, the Lease
Agreement, and the Disposition and Development Agreement by and between the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and the Donna L. Reeves Trust, UTD 7-25-
90.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADO~ at a regular meeting of the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Temecula on the_ day of .
Rotmid J. Parks, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HERI~Y DO CERTIFY that
the foregoing Resolution No. 93~ was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , 1993, by the following roll
call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
AGENCY MF~MBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
SUMMARY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 33433
of the
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT LAW
on ~
DISPOSITION AND DEVE!.OPMENT AGREEMENT
by and between the
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
and
THE DONNA T.. REEVRS TRUST U.T.D. 7-25-90
This summary report has been prepared for the Temecula
Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") pursuant to Section 33433 of the
California Health and Safety Code. This reports sets forth
certain details in the proposed Disposition and Development
Agreement ("DDA") between the. Agency and the Donna L. Reeves
Trust, U.T.D. 7-25-90 ("Reeves").
The DDA requires the Agency to acquire the property
located at 26755 Ynez Road and exchange it with Reeves for the
property located at 27500 Jefferson Road. The Agency will then
turn lease back to Reeves the Jefferson Road property.
As required by the Community Redevelopment Law, this
report also describes and specifies:
1. The cost of the proposed DDA to the Agency.
2. The estimated value of the interests to be acquired and
leased, determined at their highest uses permitted
under the Redevelopment Plan;
3. The purchase price and sum of the lease payments to be
paid by the Reeves for the interests being leased.
This report and the proposed DDA are to be made available for
public inspection prior to the approval of the DDA.
LAX:75092.1
Summary of DDA
Re: Temecula
PaGe 2
SUMMARY OF DDA
LAX:7.~-~/.I
A.
ACOUTSITION ~ND EXCFANG~ OF YNEZ PROPERTY FOR JEFFERSON
ROAD PROPERTY.
Cost to the Agency: The acquisition cost for the Ynez
Road property is one million dollars ($1,000,000).
There will be no clearance costs, relocation costs or
costs of improvements and no interest on loans or bonds
to finance the transfer.
Reeves owns the Ynez Road property. Reeves will
exchange the Ynez Road property for the Jefferson Road
Property. The Jefferson Road property will be subject
to a deed of trust in the amount of one million dollars
($1,000,000). Immediately following acquisition of the
Jefferson Road property, the Agency will pay off the
deed of trust.
The net effect of the acquisition of the Ynez Road
property and the exchange of the property for the
Jefferson Road property will be that the Agency will
acquire the Jefferson Road property for two million
dollars ($2,000,000). The appraised value of the Ynez
Road property based upon its use as automobile sales
and service center is two million-one hundred thousand
dollars ($2,100,000). The appraised value of the Ynez
Road property based upon the use of the property is an
automobile sales and service center is two million
dollars ($2,000,000).
B. LEASE OF JEFFERSON ROAD PROPERTY
Cost to the Agency: The land acquisition cost is.two
million dollars ($2,000,000.) There will be no
clearance costs, relocation costs, costs of
improvements and no interest costs or bonds.
The value of leasehold interest to be transferred based
upon highest and best use of property for automobile
storage, repair, and auto dealership accessory uses is
no greater than twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.) per
month for one year. The sum of the lease payment is
two hundred forty thousand dollars $240,000).
Summary of DDA
Re: Temecula
Page 3
DATED:
Value for the leasehold interest to be transferred to
the Reeves Trust for a e year perio s~a11 be twenty
rerty so leased· i '
11/ ~ ;~ Iv
David Dixon, Execu e Director
Redevelopment Agency
CITY OF TEMECULA
LAX:75692.1
Property Advisory Consultants
Real Estate Analysts attd Consultantv
Bradford L. Adams, MAI
Margaret Adams, MAt
Daniel J. Byers
October 10, 1993
Ms. Mary Jane McLarney
Finance Officer
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Re:
Appraisal of the Honda (27500 Jefferson Avenue) and Mazda/Acura (26799 Ynez Road)
Auto Sales and Service Centers, Temecula, California.
Dear Ms. McLarney:
Pursuant to your request and authorization, we have conducted the investigations and analyses
necessary to form opinions of the market value of the fee simple interests in the above-
referenced properties.
This appraisal has been performed so as to be in conformance with the Uniform Standards of
Professioml Appraisal Practice (USPAP) and the Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice
of the Appraisal Institute of which the signatory is a member.
Based on the investigations conducted, the analyses made, and upon our experience as real estate
analysts and appraisers, subject to the Assumptions and Limiting Conditions which follow, we
have formed the folowing opinions regarding the market values of the fee simple interests, as
of September 27, 1993:
HONDA (JEFFERSON AVENUE)
TWO Mn,LION DOLLARS
$2,000,000
MAZDA/ACURA (YNEZ ROAD~
TWO MH,LION ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS
$2,100,000
ESTIMATED MARKETING/CLOSING PERIOD
12 MONTHS OR LESS
P.O. BOX 3646 · RANCHO SANTA FE, CALIFORNIA 92067 · (619} 756-9504 Phone · (619} 756-9624 Fax
MS, Mary Jane McLarney
October 10, 1993
Page Two
The following Summary of Salient Data and Conclusiom itemiTP,8 the important facts,
descriptions and opinions concerning the subject properties. Following the summary is the
complete narrative report which sets forth the data and analyses upon which .0 .ur,-~_~'.mi.o.ns of
market value are, in part, predicated.
PROPERTY ADVISORY CONSULTANTS
Bradfo~ L. Adam, MAI
CA Cert. AG008831
SUMMARY OF SALIENT DATA AND CONCLUSIONS
Property Type:
Property Location:
Thomas Brothers Map:
Physical Data:
Year Built:
Improvemere Size:
Construction Type:
Condition:
Functional Utility:
Site Area:
Flood Zone Designation:
Highest and Best Use As Vacant:
Highest and Best Use:
Market Value of the Land:
Market Value:
Estimated Marketing Period:
Date of Value:
Date of Report:
Two auto sales and service centers
27500 Jefferson Avenue (Honda) and
26799 Ynez Roadr-t'MaZda/Acura),
Tcmecula, California.
125 D/1 (Honda) & 125 E/1
(Mazda/Acura), Riverside County
1985 (Honda) & 1988 (Mazda/Acura)
12,105 SF (Honda) & 11,065 SF
(Mazda/Acura)
Class D/S (Honda) & Class C/S
(Mazda/Acura)
Average (Honda) & Good
0V~azda/Acura)
Adequate
2.40 acres (Honda) & 2.44 acres
(Mazda/Acura)
See text
Zone X
Fee Simple
Hold for future development (Honda)
& develop as a build-to-suit for an auto
sales & service center ~Acura).
As Improved.
$1,I00,000 (Honda) & $1,010,000
(Mazda/Acura)
$2,ooo,ooo (Honda) & $2,1oo,ooo
(Mazda/Acura)
12 months or less
September 27, 1993
Oc~oher 10, 1993
RECORDED AT REQUEST OF
AND WHEN RECORDED
RETURN TO:
City Clerk
City of Temecula
43172 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, California 92390
EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES
pursuant to Government Code
Sections 6103 and 27383
DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
by and between the
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
and
The Donna L. Reeves Trust UTD 7-25-90
DATED
PROJECT AREA 1988-1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
ARTICLE I SUBJECT OF AGREEMENT ............... 1
Section 1.1
Section 1.2
Section 1.3
Section 1.4
Purpose of Agreement .......... 1
The Redevelopment Plan ......... 1
The Parcels To Be Exchanged . . ~.~,=. ~ . 2
Parties to the Agreement ....... 2
Ae
The Agency ................. 2
The Developer ................ 2
Section 1.5
Section 1.6
Prohibition Against Change in
Ownership, Management and Control
of Developer .............. 2
Contract Documents ........... 3
ARTICLE II
ACQUISITION OF PARCEL A AND EXCHANGE
WITH DEVELOPER .................. 3
Section 2.1
Section 2.2
Section 2.3
Section 2.4
Agency Acquisition of Parcel A ..... 3
Exchange ................ 3
Escrow ................. 4
Covenant to Maintain Dealership
within the City of Temecula ...... 4
ARTICLE III USE OF THE SITE ................. 4
Section 3.1
Section 3.2
Section 3.3
Section 3.4
Section 3.5
Uses .................. 4
Covenants for Non-Discrimination .... 4
Maintenance Covenants ......... 6
Effect of Violation of the Terms
and Provisions of this Agreement .... 6
Continuation of Covenants ....... 7
ARTICLE IV GENERAL PROVISIONS ................ 7
Section 4.1
Section 4.2
Section 4.3
Section 4.4
Section 4.5
Notices, Demands and
Communications Among the Parties .... 7
Conflicts of Interest ......... 8
Enforced Delay; Extension of Times
of Performance ........... 8
Non-liability of Official; ana
Employees of the Agency ........ 8
Inspection of Books and Records .... 8
ARTICLE V DEFAULTS AND REMEDIES .............. '9
Section 5.1
Section 5.2
Defaults General ........... 9
Legal Actions ............. 9
-i-
Ae
Institution of Legal Actions ........ 9
Applicable Law ............... 9
Acceptance of Service of Process 9
Section 5.3 Rights and Remedies Are Cumulative . . 10
Section 5.4 Inaction Not a Waiver of Default . . . 10
-Section 5.5 Damages ............... 10
Section 5.6 Specific Performance ......... 10
ARTICLE VI SPECIAL PROVISIONS ........... L ~. 10
Section 6.1 Continuation of Covenants ...... 10
Section 6.2 Amendments to this Agreement ..... 11
Section 6.3 Real Estate Commission ........ 11
Section 6.4 Entire Agreement, Waivers & General . 11
Section 6.5 Time For Acceptance Of Agreement
By Agency .............. 11
EXHIBIT NO. 1
EXHIBIT NO. 2
EXHIBIT NO. 3
EXHIBIT NO. 4
PARRCELA/SITE/PARCELMAP ......... 15
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL A/SITE .... 16
PARCEL B PARCEL MAP ............ 17
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL B ....... 18
-,AX:73385.4
-ii-
DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPN~NTAGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by and between the REDEVELOP-
MENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA (the "Agency") and the Donna
L. Reeves Trust UTD 7-25-90 (the "Developer") and is dated and
effective as of December 14, 1993. In consideration of the
mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the Agency. and
the Developer hereby agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
SUBJECT OF AGREEMENT
Section 1.1 Purpose of Agreement
A. The purpose of this Agreement is to effectuate the
Redevelopment Plan (hereinafter "Plan") for the 1988-1 Redevelop-
ment Project Area (hereafter "Project Area") by providing for the
redevelopment of certain property, hereafter described, located
in the Project Area, in accordance with the Plan.
B. The real property to be redeveloped pursuant to
this Agreement (the "Site" also referred to as "Parcel A") is
generally described as 26755 Ynez Street, Temecula, California
and is specifically described and depicted on Exhibit No. I and
Exhibit No. 2.
C. This Agreement is entered into for the purpose of
redeveloping the Site and not for speculation in land holding.
D. Completing the redevelopment on the Site pursuant
to this Agreement is in the vital and best interest of the City
of Temecula, California (the "City") and the health, safety, and
welfare of its residents, and in accord with the public purposes
and provisions of applicable state and local laws.
E. This Agreement pertains to and affects the ability
of the Agency to finance its statutory obligations and fdr all
parties to finance and carry out the purposes of this Agreement
and the goals of the Plan and is intended to be a Contract within
the meaning of Government Code Section 53511.
Section 1.2 The RedeveloDment Plan
The Redevelopment Plan was approvedby Ordinance No. 658 of
the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County on July 12, 1988,
prior to incorporation of the City of Temecula. Pursuant to City
Ordinance No. 91-11, which became effective May 9, 1992, and City
Ordinance No. 91-15, which became effective April 9, 1991, the
City approved the Plan. Said ordinances had the effect of
-1-
~AX:~3385.4
adopting the Plan and transferring jurisdiction to the Agency, as
of July 1, 1991.
Section 1.3 The Parcels To Be Rxchanued
Parcel A is located at 26755 Ynez Road, Temecula, California
and is more particularly described on Exhibits i and 2. Parcel B
is located at 27500 Jefferson Road, Temecula, California and is
more particularly described on Exhibits 3 and 4 attached;~ereto.
Parcel B is currently owned by Developer.
Parcel A is to be acquired by the Agency and exchanged with
Developer for Parcel B pursuant to the terms and conditions of
the "Agreement to Exchange Real Property" attached hereto as
Exhibit 5 and incorporated herein by reference. Upon acquisition
by Developer, Parcel A shall become the "Site."
Section 1.4 Parties to the A~reement
A. The Aaency
The Agency is a public body, corporate and politic,
exercising governmental functions and powers and organized and
existing under the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of
California (Section 33000, et seq., Health and Safety Code;
hereafter "Act"). The principal office of the Agency is located
at 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, 92590.
B. The Developer
The Developer is a Trust duly organized and existing
under the laws of the State of California. The principal office
and mailing address of the Developer will be: 26755 Ynez Road,
Temecula, California, 92591.
Section 1.5
Prohib4tion Aaainst Change in Ownership.
Manaaement and Control of Developer
The qualifications and identity of Developer is of p~rticu-
lar concern to the Agency. It is because of its qualifications
and identity that the Agency has entered into this Agreement with
the Developer. Therefore, no voluntary or involuntary successor
in interest of the Developer shall acquire any rights or powers
under this Agreement except as expressly set forth herein.
The Developer shall not assign all or any of its rights or
duties under this Agreement nor convey the Site without the prior
written approval of the Agency, which consent the Agency shall
not unreasonably withhold provided the Agency determines that the
successor is similarly qualified and has specifically agreed in
writing to be bound by the provisions of this Agreement.
-2-
All of the terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement
shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the
Developer and the permitted successors and assigns of the Devel-
oper. Whenever the term "Developer" is used herein, such term
shall include any other lawful successors in interest of
Developer.
Section 1.6 Contract Documents
The Contract Documents which are part of this Agreem~nt~ and
each of which are incorporated herein by this reference, are as
follows:
Exhibit No. I Parcel A/Site Parcel Map
Exhibit No. 2 Legal Description of Parcel A/Site
Exhibit No. 3 Parcel B Parcel Map
Exhibit No. 4 Legal Description of Parcel B
Exhibit No. 5 Agreement To
Exchange Real Property
Exhibit No. 6 Escrow Instructions
ARTICLE II
ACQUISITION OF PARCEL A
AND EXCHANGE WITH DEVELOPER
Section 2.1 Agency Acquisition of Parcel A
In accordance with and subject to all of the terms,
covenants and conditions of this Agreement, the Agency agrees
hereby to acquire Parcel A subject to the terms, conditions and
provisions of this Agreement.
Section 2.2 Exchange
A. In accordance with and subject to all terms,
covenants and conditions of this Agreement and of the "Agreement
To Exchange Real Property" attached hereto as Exhibit No.5, the
Agency agrees to acquire and exchange Parcel A with Developer for
Parcel B. Developer agrees to redevelop Parcel A within the
times, and subject to the terms, conditions and provisions all as
hereinafter provided.
-3-
Section 2.3 ~scrow ~
The Parties hereto shall enter into Escrow for the
acquisition and exchange. The Escrow Instructions shall be
substantially in the form of Escrow Instructions attached hereto
as Exhibit 6 and may be amended as necessary. Escrow must close
on or before January 30, 1994 or this agreement is null and void
in its entirety.
Section 2.4 Covenant to Ma4ntain Dealership withi~ the
city of Temecula
As consideration for this Agreement Developer shall maintain
a new vehicle dealership franchise within the City of Temecula on
the Site for a period of five years. If the Developer's
dealership on the Site closes, Developer shall not participate in
the opening of a new dealership until such time as it opens a new
dealership on the Site in Temecula. Developer may sell the
franchise to another person to comply with this paragraph
provided the successor is qualified under Section 1.5 and agrees
to be bound by the terms of this Agreement.
AX:T'J3gS.4
ARTICLE III
USE OF THE SITE
Section 3.1 Uses
The Developer covenants and agrees for itself, its succes-
sors, its assigns, and every successor in interest to the Site or
any part thereof, that the Developer, and such successors and
such assignees, shall devote the Site to use as an Automobile
Sales and Service Center for a period of five years beginning on
the date Developer obtains fee title to the Site.
Section 3.2 Covenants for Non-Discrimination
A. The Developer covenants by and for itself and any
successors in interest that there shall be no discriminatkon
against or segregation of any person or group of persons on
account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status,
age, handicap, national origin or ancestry in the sale, lease,
sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the
Site, nor shall the Developer itself or any person claiming under
or through it establish or permit any such practice or practices
of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection,
location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees,
subtenants, sublessees or vendees of the Site.
B. The Developer shall refrain from restricting the
rental, sale or lease of the Site on the basis of race, color,
creed, religion, sex, marital status, handicap, national origin
-4-
or ancestry of any person. All such deeds, leases or contracts
shall contain or be subject to substantially the following
nondiscrimination or nonsegregation clauses:
In deeds: "The grantee herein covenants by
and for himself or herself, his or her heirs,
executors, administrators and assigns, and
all persons claiming under or through them,
that there shall be no discriminationsagainst
or segregation of, any person or group of
persons on account of race, color, creed,
religion, sex, marital status, handicap,
national origin or ancestry in the sale,
lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy,
tenure or enjoyment of the land herein
conveyed, nor shall the grantee himself or
herself or any person claiming under or
through him or her, establish or permit any
such practice or practices of discrimination
or segregation with reference to the selec-
tion, location, number, use or occupancy of
tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees or
vendees in the land herein conveyed. The
foregoing covenants shall run with the land."
In leases: "The lessee herein covenants by
and for himself or herself, his or her heirs,
executors, administrators and assigns, and
all persons claiming under or through him or
her, and this lease is made and accepted upon
and subject to the following conditions:
"There shall be no discrimination
against or segregation of any person or
group of persons on account of race,
color, creed, religion, sex, marital
status, handicap, ancestry or national
origin in the leasing, subleasing,
transferring, use, occupancy, tenure ~r
enjoyment of the premises herein leased
nor shall the lessee himself or herself,
or any person claiming under or through
him or her, establish or permit any such
practice or practices of discrimination
or segregation with reference to the se-
lection, location, number, use or occu-
pancy of tenants, lessees, sublessees,
subtenants or vendees in the premises
herein leased."
In contracts: "There shall be no discrimina-
tion against or segregation of, any person,
-5-
LAX.'73395.4
or group of persons on account of race,
color, creed, religion, sex, marital status,
handicap, ancestry or national origin, in the
sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occu-
pancy, tenure or enjoyment of the premises,
nor shall the transferee himself or herself
or any person claiming under or through him
or her, establish or permit any such practice
or practices of discrimination or segregation
with reference to the selection, location,
number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees,
subtenants, sublessees or vendees of the
premises.'
C. The covenants established in this Section and the
deeds shall, without regard to technical classification and
designation, be binding for the benefit and in favor of the
Agency, its successors and assigns, the City and any successor in
interest to the Site or any part thereof. The covenants,
contained in this Section and the Grant Deed shall remain in
perpetuity.
Section 3.3 Maintenance Covenants
Developer, and all successors and assigns in interest to the
Site, shall be obligated to maintain the Site, and all improve-
ments and landscaping situated thereon, in a clean and neat
condition and in a continuous state of good repair. In the event
the Developer fails to maintain the Site as required by this
Agreement, Agency shall notify Developer in writing of such
failure and specify the work necessary to meet the maintenance
obligation. In the event the work specified is not completed
within ten (10) days of the date of said notice, Agency may enter
the Site, complete the work, and bill Developer for the cost of
said work.
Section 3.4
Effect of V.~olat~on of the Terms and Provi-
sions of th.~s A~reement
The Agency is deemed the beneficiary of the terms and
provisions of this Agreement and of the covenants running with
the land, for and in its own rights and for the purposes of
protecting the interests of the community and other parties,
public or private, in whose favor and for whose benefit this
Agreement and the covenants running with the land have been
provided. The Agreement-and the covenants shall run in favor of
the Agency, without regard to whether the Agency has been,
remains or is an owner of any land or interest therein in the
Site or in the Project Area. The Agency shall have the right, if
the Agreement or covenants are breached, to exercise all rights
and remedies, and to maintain any actions or suits at law or in
equity or other proper proceedings to enforce the curing of such
-6-
breaches to which it or any other beneficiaries of this Agreement
and covenants may be entitled.
Section 3.5 Continuation of Covenants
A. Of the covenants which have been established
pursuant to this Agreement, the same shall be deemed to be
covenant running with the land for the benefit of the Project
Area and the Agency in carrying out its statutory respons~bi.li-
ties under California Redevelopment Act (Health and Safety Code
: Sections 33000 et seq.) to implement the Redevelopment Plan. The
covenants contained in this Grant Deed shall be binding for the
benefit of the Project Area and the Agency and its successors and
assigns, and such covenants shall run in favor of the Agency for
the entire period during which such covenants shall be in force
and effect, without regard to whether the Agency is or remains an
owner of any land or interest therein to which such covenants
relate.
B. Covenants relating to the use of the Site and
improvements thereon shall expire at the end of the fifth (Sth)
year following Developer's acquisition of the Site. The coven-
ants relating to maintenance in this Grant Deed and against
discrimination contained in this Grant Deed shall remain in
perpetuity.
C. The Agency, in the event of any breach of any such
covenants, shall have the right to exercise all of the rights and
remedies, and to maintain any actions at law or suits in equity
or other proper proceedings to enforce the curing of such breach.
The covenants contained in this Grant Deed shall be for the
benefit of and shall be enforceable only by the Agency and its
successors.
ARTICLE IV
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 4.1 Notices. Demands and Communications _Among the
Parties
|
Written notices, demands and communications among the Agency
and the Developer, shall be sufficiently given by personal
service or dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage
prepaid, return receipt requested, to the principal offices of
the Agency or the Developer described in Section 1.4. Such
written notices, demands and communications may be sent in the
same manner to such other addresses as either party may from time
to time designate by mail as provided in this Section. Notwith-
standing anything to the contrary contained herein, notice
personally served shall be deemed to have been received as of the
date of such services.
-7-
Section 4.2 Conflicts of IDterest
The Developer warrants ~hat it has not paid or given and
will not pay or give any officer, employee or agent of the City
or Agency any money or other consideration for obtaining this
Agreement.
Section 4.3 ~nfo~ced De]av: ~cens.~on of Times of Perfor-
mance ~
A. In addition to specific provisions of this Agree-
ment, performance by either party hereunder shall not be deemed
to be in default, and all performance and other dates specified
in this Agreement shall be extended, where party seeking the
extension has acted diligently and delays or defaults are due to
events beyond the reasonably control of the party such as but not
limited to: war; insurrection; strikes; lockouts; riots; floods;
earthquakes; fires; casualties; acts of God; acts of the public
enemy; epidemics; quarantine restrictions; freight embargoes;
lack of transportation; litigation; unusually severe weather; or
any other causes beyond the control or without the fault of the
party claiming an extension of time to perform.
B. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Agreement, an extension of time for any such cause shall be for
the period of the enforced delay and shall commence to run from
the time of the commencement of the cause, if notice by the party
claiming such extension is sent to the other party within thirty
(30) days of the commencement of the cause.
C. Times of performance under this Agreement may also
be extended in writing by the mutual agreement of Agency and the
Developer.
Section 4.4
Non-liability of Officials and EmPloyees of
the Aaencv
No member, official or employee of the Agency or the City
shall be personally liable to the Developer, or any successor in
interest, pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement, nor for
any default or breach by the Agency or the City.
Section 4.5 Tnspection of Books and Records
Each party has the right to inspect, at reasonable times,
the books and records of the other pertaining to the Site as
pertinent to the purposes of this Agreement.
LAX:73385.4
-8-
LAX:7~ _ .4
ARTICLE V
DEFAULTS AND REMEDIES
Section'5.1 Defaults -- General
A. Subject to the extensions of time set forth in
Section 5.3, failure or delay by either party to perform any term
or provision of this Agreement constitutes a default under this
Agreement. A party claiming a default (claimant) shall give
written notice of default to the other party, specifying the
default complained of.
B. The claimant shall not terminate this Agreement
pursuant to Section 6.7, institute proceedings against the other
party nor be entitled to damages if the other party within
fourteen (14) days from receipt of such notice immediately, with
due diligence, commences to cure, correct or remedy such failure
or delay and shall complete such cure, correction or remedy
within sixty (60) days from the date of receipt of such notice or
if such cure, correction or remedy by its nature cannot be
effected within such sixty (60) day period, such cure, correction
or remedy is diligently and continuously prosecuted until
completion thereof. Such cure, correction and remedy shall
include payment of any costs, expenses (including attorney fees)
or damages incurred by the non-defaulting party resulting from
the default or during the period of default.
Section 5.2 Legal Actions
A. Institution of Legal Actions
Any legal actions related to or arising out of this
Agreement must be instituted in the Superior Court of the County
of Riverside, State of California, in an appropriate municipal
court in that county, or, if federal jurisdiction exists, ~n the
Federal District Court in the Central District of California. In
the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other
to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party,
as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to
reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief
granted.
B. APPlicable Law
The laws of the State of California shall govern the
interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement.
C. Acceptance of Service of Process
1. In the event that any legal action is com-
menced by the Developer against the Agency, service of process on
-9-
the Agency shall be made by personal service upon the Executive
Director or in such other manner as may be provided by law.
2. In the event that any legal action is com-
menced by the Agency against the Developer, service of process on
the Developer shall be made by personal service upon a corporate
officer of the Developer and shall be valid whether made within
or without the State of California or in such other manner as may
be provided by law.
Section 5.3 Riahts and Remedies Are Cumulat.{ve
Except as otherwise expressly stated in this Agreement, the
rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative, and the
exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or reme-
dies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or
different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same
default or any other default by the other party.
Section 5.4 Inaction Not a Waiver of Default
Any failures or delays by either party in asserting any of
its rights and remedies as to any default shall not operate as a
waiver of any default or of any such rights or remedies, or
deprive either such party of its right to institute and maintain
any actions or proceedings which it may deem necessary to pro-
tect, assert or enforce any such rights or remedies.
Section 5.5 Damages
If a default is not fully cured by the defaulting party as
provided in Section 6.1, the defaulting party shall be liable to
the other party for any damages caused by such default, and the
nondefaulting party may thereafter (but not before) commence an
action for damages against the defaulting party with respect to
such default.
Section 5.6 SDeCifiC Performance
If a default under this Agreement is not fully cured by the
defaulting party as provided in Section 6.1, the nondefaulting
party at its option may thereafter (but not before) commence an
action for specific performance of terms of this Agreement.
LAX:73385.4
ARTICLE VI
SPECIAL PROVISIONS
Section 6.1 Continuation of Covenants
Of the covenants which have been established pursuant to
this Agreement, the same shall be deemed to be covenant running
-10-
with the land. Covenants relating to the use and maintenance of
the Site and improvements thereon shall expire at the end of the
fifth (5th) year following recordation of a Grant Deed conveying
fee title to the Site from Agency to Developer. The covenants
against discrimination contained in Section 3.2 shall remain in
perpetuity.
Section 6.2 ~mendments to this Agreement
The Developer and the Agency agree to mutually conslair'
reasonable requests for amendments to this Agreement which may be
made by lending institutions, or Agency's counsel or financial
consultants, provided said requests are consistent with this
Agreement and would not substantially alter the basic business
terms included herein.
Section 6.3 Real ~state Commission
Developer shall pay all claims of brokers, agents or
finders, licensed or unlicensed, and all claims of real estate or
other consultants which exist or may arise with respect to either
Parcel being exchanged. Agency shall not be liable for any such
fees and Developer shall indemnify Agency, its officers,
employees and agents, from any and all costs, liabilities or
judgments, including attorneys' fees, incurred in defending or
paying any such claims.
Section 6.4 ~ntire Agreement. Waivers & General
A. This Agreement is executed in duplicate originals,
each of which is deemed to be an original. This Agreement
includes pages i through 16 and Exhibits I through 6, which
constitute the entire understanding and agreement of the parties.
B. This Agreement integrates all of the terms and
conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto, and supersedes
all negotiations or previous agreements between the parties or
their predecessors in interest with respect to all or any part of
the subject matter hereof.
C. All amendments hereto must be in writing executed
by the appropriate authorities of the Agency and the Developer.
D. Both Parties are sophisticated buyers and sellers
of real property and have participated in the drafting of this
Agreement.
Section 6.5 Time For Acceptance Of Agreement By Developer
This Agreement, when executed by the Agency and delivered to
the Developer, must be authorized, executed and delivered by the
Developer on or before ten (10) days after signing and delivery
-11-
of this Agreement by Agency or this Agreement shall be void,
except to the extent that the Agency shall consent in writing to
a further extension of time forthe authorization, execution and
delivery of this Agreement. The date of this Agreement shall be
the date when it shall have been approved by the Agency.
IN-WITNESS WHEREOF, the Agency and the Developer have signed
this Agreement as of the date first written above.
REDEVELOPMENTAGENCY OFT HE ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field
Counsel to the Agency
DONNA L. REEVES TRUST
UTD 7-25-90
By:
Trustee
LAX:73395.4
-12 -
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) sso
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
On 19 , before me, the undersigned, a
Notary Public in and fo; sa~ state, personally appeared
and , proved
to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons
whose names are subscribed to the within instrument as. Chairman
and Secretary, respectively, of the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 'OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA, the public agency therein named, and acknowl-
edged to me that they executed the same in their authorized
capacities, and that by their signatures on the instrument the
entity upon behalf of which the persons acted, executed the
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Name (typed or printed)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
On , 19__, before me, the undersigned, a
Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared
, proved to me on the basis
of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is sub-
scribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that
he/she executed the same in his/her authorized capacity, and that
by his/her signature on the instrument the person, or the entity
upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Name (typed or printed)
-13 -
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
On , 19 , before me, the undersigned, a
Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared SCOTT F.
FIELD, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be
the person whose name is subscribed tothe within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized
capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the"person,
or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Name (typed or prin=ed)
LAX:73385.4
-14-
EXHIBIT NO. 1
PARCh. A/SITE/PARCEL MAP
[TO BE INSERTED BY A~ENCY STAFF]
LAX:~ 4
EXHIBIT NO. 2
LEGAL DRSCRIPTION OF PARCEL A/SITE
[TO BE INSERTED BY AGENCY STAFF]
Approved by:
AGENCY:
By
DEVELOPER:
By
EXHIBIT NO. 3
PARCEL B PARCEL MAP
[TO BE INSERTED BY ]&eENCY STAFF]
LAX:~. ~
EXHIBIT NO. 4
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL B
[TO BE INSERTED BY AeENOY STAFF]
Approved by:
AGENCY:
By
DEVELOPER:
By
AGREEMENT TO EXCHANGE REAL PROPERTY
This Agreement to Exchange Real Property (this
',Agreement") is made and entered into as of this day of
December, 1993 by and between the Donna L. Reeves Trust UTD
7-25-90 ("Reeves")' and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Temecula, a public body, corporate and politic ("Agency") with
reference to the following facts:
RECITALS
A. WHEREAS, Reeves is the owner of a parcel of land,
together with all improvements and fixtures thereon, commonly
known as 27500 Jefferson Road, Temecula, California and legally
described at Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference
incorporated herein (the "Jefferson Parcel"); and
B. WHEREAS, Reeves desires to dispose of its above
described real property interest in the Jefferson Parcel, which
it currently values at $2 million, and to acquire that certain
replacement real property, together with improvements and
fixtures thereon, commonly known as 26755 Ynez Road, Temecula,
California and legally described at Exhibit "B" attached hereto
and by this reference incorporated herein, which it values at $2
million, (the "Ynez Parcel") in an exchange which qualifies as a
tax deferred exchange under Internal Revenue Code Section 1031;
and,
C. WHEREAS, the Agency desires to acquire the
Jefferson Parcel and to accommodate Reeve's exchange of the
Jefferson Parcel for the Ynez Parcel, upon the terms and
conditions hereinafter set forth:
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants
and conditions'set forth below, the parties hereto agree as.
follows:
1. EXCFa~NGE OF PROPERTIES-
1.1 Jefferson Parcel. Reeves agrees to convey the
Jefferson Parcel to the Agency in accordance with the terms and
conditions set forth in this Agreement.
1.2 Ynez Parcel. The Agency agrees to accept title to
and convey the Ynez Parcel to Reeves in accordance with the terms
of this Agreement.
2. CONSIDERATION FOR JEFFERSON PARCEL.
2.1. Deposit of Funds into Escrow. In consideration
for the conveyance by Reeves of the Jefferson Parcel to the
Agency, on or before the third day prior to the scheduled date of
the close of escrow, the Agency shall deposit the sum of Six
Hundred Forty Five Thousand Five Hundred and Five Dollars-
($645,505) into that certain escrow account known as #100202 held
with Wilshire Escrow located at 4270 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles,
California 90010 (the "Ynez Escrow"). The Agency shall
thereafter be substituted as the entity which will take title to
the Ynez Parcel at the close of the Ynez Escrow. Except as
expressly stated above, the Agency shall not be obligated in any
LAX: ~4~49.1
-2-
LAX:, ~.1
manner whatsoever to comply with any condition, cost, or
requirement necessary to close the Ynez Escrow. The Ynez Escrow
instructions shall be amended to reflect the terms of this
Agreement, and shall further be amended to reflect that the close
of the Ynez Escrow is expressly conditioned upon, and to occur
concurrent with the close of the Jefferson Escrow, referenced at
Article 3 of this Agreement. Should the Ynez Escrow or the'
Jefferson Escrow fail to close for any reason whatsoever, the
Agency shall be entitled to an immediate return of its $646,505
deposit, plus interest if any, and without offset whatsoever.
2.2 Assumption of Trust Deed. In further considera-
tion of the conveyance by Reeves of the Jefferson Property to the
Agency, the Agency shall be substituted as the obligor on that
certain Note and Trust Deed held on the Jefferson Parcel by
[Ticor] in favor of Toki Bank of California in the amount of One
Million Three Hundred Fifty Four Thousand, Four Hundred and
Ninety Five Dollars ($1,354,495), provided however, that prior to
the close of Jefferson Escrow, the Agency and Toki Bank of
California shall have d~posited into the Jefferson Escrow either
a Novation on the existing Note and Trust Deed, or a reformed
Note and Trust Deed, in form acceptable to both the Agency and
Toki Bank of California.
3. JEFFERSON ESCROW.
3.1. On or before December , 1993, Reeves and the
Agency shall establish an escrow account with Wilshire Escrow,
located at 4270 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, California 90010,
-3-
for the purpose of effecting the conveyance of the Ynez and
Jefferson Parcels in accordance with the terms of this Agreement
(the "Jefferson Escrow"). All recording fees, documentary
transfer taxes, and escrow fees and charges shall be paid through
escrow by Reeves and the Agency equally. Real Property taxes on
the Jefferson Parcel shall be prorated based upon the most recent
tax assessment as of the date of closing. Except as otherwise
provided herein, all other charges shall be borne and the
expenses prorated in accordance with the standard custom and
practice of Wilshire Escrow. Close of the Jefferson Escrow shall
be made expressly contingent upon the conditions set forth at
Article 7 of this Agreement.
4. TITLE INSURANCE.
4.1 Jefferson Parcel Title Insurance. Title to the
Jefferson Parcel shall be transferred by Grant Deed and shall be
evidenced by a California Land Title Association Standard
Coverage policy of Title Insurance in the full amount of the
appraised value of the Jefferson Parcel, issued by Continental
Lawyers Title Company. The Agency shall obtain the Title
Insurance Policy and Reeves shall reimburse the Agency, through
escrow, for all costs of obtaining the CTLA policy. The parties
are aware that existing fences, perimeter walls, tree lines or
other barriers may not necessarily define the boundary lines of
the Jefferson Parcel. Either party may verify the actual legal
boundaries of the Jefferson Parcel by obtaining a survey prior Ito
the close of escrow. In addition, the Agency shall be entitled
~AX: 74249.1 -- 4 '
LAX'~, ,9.1
to request, and Reeves agrees to cooperate with the Agency in the
event it should desire 'to obtain an ATLA policy on the Jefferson
Parcel, provided however, that the Agency shall bear all addi-
tional title insurance costs over and above those required to
obtain the CTLA policy.
Within 5Adays of the opening of the Jefferson Escrow,
Reeves shall (a) deliver to Reeves and (b) deposit into the
Jefferson Escrow, a Preliminary Title report on the Jefferson
Parcel. The Agency shall have 10Adays from the date of the
delivery of the Preliminary Title Report to Reeves to review said
report and to object to any item listed thereon. In the event
the Agency fails to give notice of any objection within the
prescribed time, the Preliminary Title Report shall be deemed
approved. Reeves shall remedy any objection raised by the Agency
within 15Adays of such objection. In the event Reeves shall fail
to remedy any objection within the 15 day period, then the Agency
shall have 3ndays to waive, in writing, any objection which has
not been remedied. If, upon expiration of the 3^day period, the
Agency has not waived t~e remedy of any outstanding objection,
then this Agreement shall automatically terminate and the
Jefferson Escrow shall automatically cancel, and Reeves and the
Agency shall be released from all liabilities and obligations
hereunder accruing from and after the date of the termination and
cancellation.
4.2. Ynez Parcel Title Insurance. Title to the Ynez
Parcel shall be transferred by the Agency to Reeves in the same
-5-
manner and form, and subject to all liens, encumbrances, and
claims of any nature whatsoever, whether the same be a matter of
record or otherwise, as that acquired by the Agency at the close
of the Ynez Escrow.
5. INSPECTION OF THE,JEFFERSON PRRCEL.
For a period of 20Adays after the deposit of this
Agreement into the Jefferson Escrow, the Agency shall have the
right, at its sole cost and expense, to employ qualified
professionals of its own choosing, (a) to inspect and investigate
the Jefferson Parcel and improvements and fixtures thereon,
including, but not limited to, the general structure, plumbing,
heating, air conditioning, electrical, built-in appliances, sewer
or septic system(s), roof, foundation, mechanical systems and
hydraulics, (b) to test for and locate any substances/products,
including asbestos, formaldehyde and radon gas, which may be
present on the Jefferson Parcel and may constitute a health risk,
and (c) to make geological, soils, and drainage inspections,
investigations, tests, surveys, or other studies of the Jefferson
Parcel. This Agreement] and the close of the Jefferson Escrow,
shall be contingent upon the Agency's approval of all such
independent inspections. In the event the Agency shall
disapprove of any item contained in the report of any independent
inspector, the Agency shall deliver to Reeves and deposit into
the Jefferson Escrow, the underlying inspector's report, noting
the disapproved item(s). Reeves shall thereafter have 15Adays.
from the date of delivery of the report to Reeves to remedy said
LAX: 74249. I -- 6 -- ,,
LA, Z4~. 1
item. In the event Reeves shall fail to remedy any item within
the 15Aday time period, then the Agency shall have 3 days to
waive, in writing, the remedy of any disapproved item. If,
withinsaid 3Aday period, the Agency has not waived the remedy of
any disapproved item, then this Agreement shall automatically
terminate and the Jefferson Escrow shall be cancelled, and Reeves
and the Agency shall be released from all liabilities and
obligations hereunder accruing from and after the date of such
termination and cancellation. T_he Agency shall be allowed a
final walk-through inspection of the Jefferson Parcel within 5
calendar days prior to the close of the Jefferson Escrow.
6. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF REEVES
Reeves hereby makes the following representations and
warranties, each of which shall be true on the date of the
closing of the Jefferson Escrow:
A. Except as otherwise disclosed in writing, which
writing shall be labeled "Disclosure Statement" and must be
approved in writing by the Agency and attached to this Agreement
prior to the close of [he Jefferson Escrow, Reeves has no know-
ledge of any violation, whether asserted or unasserted, of any
city, county, state, federal, building, zoning, fire and/or
health laws or other government regulation affecting the
Jefferson Parcel, or any improvements or fixtures thereon.
B. Reeves will convey good and marketable title to
the Jefferson Parcel, free and clear of all liens, assessments,
security interests, mortgages, claims and encumbrances, excepting
-7-
only (1)'the lien of the Trust Deed assumed by the Agency in
accordance with the provisions of Article 2.2 of this Agreement,
and (2) those items disclosed in the Preliminary Title Report
delivered to the Agency in accordance with the provisions of
Article 4.1 of this Agreement and which have been approved by the
· .Agency, or, if objected to by the Agency, have been remedied by
Reeves, or if not remedied by Reeves, waived by the Agency, all
as provided in said Article 4.1.
C. The execution, delivery and performance of this
Agreement does not and will not result in any breach or violation
of, nor conflict with, any agreement, instrument or contract to
which Reeves is a party or to which Reeves or the Jefferson
Parcel is subject or bound.
D. Reeves has all requisite right, power, legal
capacity and authority to enter into and fully perform the terms
of this Agreement, and no approvals or consents of any persons or
entities, other than those mentioned in this Agreement, are
necessary to consummate this Agreement.
E. To the e~tent applicable, Reeves has fully
complied, or has caused there to be full compliance, with the
provisions of Division 6 of the California Uniform Commercial
Code respecting bulk sale requirements which may relate to the
Ynez Escrow and the conveyance of the Ynez Parcel.
F. No Hazardous Materials (as defined below) are or
have been used, released, stored, manufactured, generated or
disposed of on, under or about, or transported to or from, the
LAX: 74Z/.9.1
-8-
LAX:,_,~9.1
Jefferson Parcel (including, without limitation, the soil and
groundwater thereunder). To the best of Reeve's knowledge, no
Hazardous Materials have been incorporated into or used in
constructing any improvements in or on the Jefferson Parcel. As
used in this Agreement, the phrase "Hazardous Materials" shall
mean any hazardous, toxic, corrosive, reactive, ignitable,
carcinogenic or reproductive toxic substance, material, product,
compound, chemical or waste (including, without limitation,
petroleum, including crude oil or any fraction thereof, asbestos
or asbestos-containing materials, flammable explosives,
radioactive materials, and polychlorinated biphenyl) as defined
in or regulated by any federal, state or local law, ordinance,
regulation or code regarding the environment or health, safety or
welfare (,,Environmental Laws"). To the best of Reeve's
howledge, the Jefferson Parcel (including, without limitation,
the soil and groundwater thereunder) is not in violation of any
Environmental Laws. No above-ground or underground tanks exist
on, under or about the Jefferson Parcel.
G. The improvements on the Jefferson Parcel include
three buildings comprised of (1) a service building of
approximately 4,500 square feet, (2) a sales building of
approximately 1,800 square feet,. and (3) an office and parts
building of approximately 6,000 square feet, for an aggregate
square footage of approximately 12,300 gross square feet. There
are now and, at the time of the Closing Date of the Jefferson
Escrow will be, no material physical or mechanical defects in any
-9-
improvements or fixtures on the Jefferson Parcel, including,
without limitation, the plumbing systems, the heating,
ventilation and air conditioning systems, the electrical systems,
the roof, elevators, and any other building systems, appliances,
equipment, mechanical fixtures and hydraulics; and Reeves has
maintained all such items in good operating condition and repair
and in compliance with all applicable governmental laws,
ordinances, regulations, and requirements, and will convey the
same to Agency free and clear of any liens, claims, taxes,
assessments, encumbrances and liabilities of any nature
whatsoever.
H. All of the documents, information and records
provided by Reeves to Agency in accordance with this Agreement
contain true and accurate information and do not omit any
material fact.
I. Reeves has no knowledge of any pending, threatened
or potential litigation, action or proceeding against Reeves or
any other par~y before any court or administrative tribunal which
is in any way related t~ the Jefferson Parcel.
J. All contracts, agreements, understandings-and
commitments, written or oral, with vendors or service providers,
affecting any part of the Jefferson Parcel, are disclosed in
Exhibit D attached hereto, and by this reference incorporated
herein.
LAX: 742~.9.1
--10--
7. CONDITIONS TO CLOSE OF JEFFERSON ESCROW.
The obligations of the parties to exchange the
Jefferson and Ynez Parcels are hereby conditioned upon, and
expressly made contingent upon, each and all of the following:
A. On or before the close of the Ynez Escrow, the
Agency shall have obtained from Gary L. Anderson, Harriett A.
Anderson, John R. Harrison and Judy P. Harrison, as Sellers of
the Ynez Parcel, an indemnification in the form of Exhibit "C"
attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
B. On or before the close of the Jefferson Escrow,
Reeves shall have caused a statement, dated the date of the
Close, to be issued directly to the Agency from Toki Bank of
California as holder of the Note and Trust Deed on the Jefferson
Parcel. Said statement shall list the following with
particularity: (1) that the Note and Trust Deed are not in
default and are in good standing in all respects as of the date
of the statement, (2) that no late payments, fees, charges,
penalties or costs of any nature are accrued under or with
respect to the Note and Trust Deed as of the date of the
statement, and (3) the outstanding principal amount of the Note
as of the date of the statement.
C. On or before the close of the Jefferson Escrow,
the Agency and Toki Bank of California shall have depositedinto
the Jefferson Escrow, a Novation of Note and Trust Deed, or a
reformed Note and Trust Deed on the Jefferson Parcel in an amount
and form satisfactory to both the Agency and Toki Bank of
California.
D. On or before the date of the close of the
Jefferson Escrow, the Agency and Reeves shall have entered into a
triple net Lease of the Jefferson Parcel with the Agency as
Landlord and Reeves as tenant, with a leasehold period of not
less than one (1) year and at a rental rate of Twenty Thousand
Dollars ($20,000) per month.
If the above specified events have not occurred on or
before December 30, 1993, then this Agreement shall terminate,
and the Ynez and Jefferson Escrows shall be cancelled effective
December 31, 1993, and Wilshire Escrow is instructed to
immediately return to the Agency, in full, all amounts deposited
by the Agency into the Ynez Escrow, with interest thereon, if
any, without offset or ~eduction whatsoever, and Reeves and the
Agency shall be released from all liabilities and obligations
hereunder accruing from and after the date of such termination
and cancellation.
LAX: 74249.1
-12-
8. TAX' EXCHANGE TREATMENT AND INDEMNIFICATIONS.
While it is the intent of these parties that this
exchange qualify as a tax deferred exchange under Internal
Revenue Code Section 1031, the Agency makes no warranty or
representation whatsoever that this transaction will in fact
qualify for tax deferred exchange treatment under said Section,
nor that the Agency will hold the Jefferson Parcel for any period
of time which may be required for Reeves to satisfy the
provisions of Internal Revenue Code Section 1031.
Reeves hereby agrees to bear all costs, including
without limitation, all escrow and title transfer costs and fees
associated with the Agency's acquisition of the Ynez Parcel, and
to indemnify the Agency for all such costs and fees.
It is further agreed that the Agency is accepting title
to the Ynez Parcel, and transferring said title to Reeves
hereunder, solely to accommodate and assist Reeves in qualifying
for tax deferred exchange treatment. Accordingly, Reeves agrees
to indemnify and hold the Agency harmless from and against any
and all costs, claims, losses, liabilities, actions, suits and
damages which the Agency may suffer or incur relating to or
concerning the Ynez Parcel and/or which may arise out of or under
this Agreement and/or the Agency's placement in the Ynez Parcel
chain of title, excepting only costs, claims, losses,
liabilities, actions, suits and damages which directly arise out
the Agency's failure to perform its obligations under this
Agreement.
-13 -
Reeves further agrees to indemnify and hold the Agency
harmless from and against any and all costs, claims, losses,
liabilities, actions, suits, and damages which the Agency may
suffer or incur, and which arise out of or result from any breach
of, or inaccuracy in, any of the representations and warranties
given by Reeves pursuant to the provisions of Article 6 of this
Agreement.
Reeves, its successors, assigns, and guarantors agrees
to indemnify, defend, reimburse and hold harmless the Agency and
the Agency's elected officials, officers, directors, employees,
agents, contractors, subcontractors, experts, and the City of
Temecula from and against any and all causes of action, damages,
claims, demands, agreements, losses and other liabilities of
whatever kind or nature arising in whole or in part from the
presence of any "hazardous materials" or violation of any
"environmental laws" which arise out of, under or as a result of
Reeves' ownership, use or operation of the Jefferson Parcel and
the Ynez Parcel. This obligation shall include the burden and
expense of defending alX claims and suits even if such claims or
suits are groundless, false, or fraudulent, and paying amd
discharging, when and as same become due, any and all judgments,
penalties or other sums due against Temecula.
The indemnifications provided in this Article shall be
in addition to any and all rights and remedies under this
Agreement, or at law or in equity, to which the Agency may be
entitled and shall include all costs suffered or incurred by or
LAX:TI. 249.1 --14-- ',,
LAX~, _49.1
on behalf ofthe Agency in resisting, defending or settling any
matter for which indemnity is provided hereunder, including,
without limitation, costs of investigating any such matter and
attorneys' fees. The above indemnifications, and the provisions
of this Article 8, shall survive the closing of the Jefferson
Escrow and any termination or expiration of this Agreement.
9. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
9.1. SucCessors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be
binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors, assigns,
personal and legal representatives of the Agency and Reeves.
9.2. Entire Agreement. This Agreement sets forth the
entire understanding of the parties with respect to the subject
matter hereof. In the event of any conflict between the terms of
this Agreement and the Ynez or Jefferson Escrow instructions, or
any other document entered into in furtherance of this Agreement,
the terms of this Agreement shall prevail.
9.3 Arbitration. Any controversy arising out of this
Agreement shall be settled by reference pursuant to the provision
of California Code of C~vil Procedure, Section 638, before an
agreed upon referee or judge-for-hire, in a non-jury trial. If
the parties cannot agree upon a specific referee or judge, they
shall adopt such procedures necessary to allow third parties,
including an arbitration board, to appoint a specific referee or
judge for hire. Judgment upon the award rendered by the
reference may be entered in any court having jurisdiction over
this Agreement. The parties shall share the fees for any judge-
-15-
for-hire and costs incurred in connection with the reference. If
for any reason whatsoever, the foregoing reference does not
occur, any controversy or dispute shall be settled by binding
arbitration before a single arbitrator selected pursuant to
California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1281.6, in accordance
with the provisions regarding arbitration set forth in California
Code of Civil Procedure Section 1280, et seq.
9.4 Attorneys' Fees. In the event of any legal
proceeding arising out of or related to this Agreement, the
prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable
attorneys' fees and costs as set by the trier of fact.
9.5 Notices. Excepting those items to be deposited
into escrow pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement, all
notices, requests, demands, consents and other communications
required or permitted to be given under the terms of this
Agreement shall be in writing addressed to the recipient party's
Notice Address set forth below, and shall be deemed to have been
duly given or made (a) if delivered personally (including
commercial courier or d~livery service) to the party's Notice
Address, then as of the date delivered (or if delivery i~
refused, upon presentation), or (b) if mailed by certified mail
to the party's Notice Address, postage prepaid and return receipt
requested, then at the time received at the party's Notice
Address as evidenced by the return receipt, or (c) if mailed by
first class mail to the party's Notice Address, postage prepaid,
then at the time received at the party's Notice Address. A party
LAX:74Z49.1 -16- ,,,
may only change its Notice Address by a Notice given in the
foregoing form and manner. Each party's initial Notice Address
is as follows:
If to Reeves:
Copy to:
If to The Agency:
Copy to:
Donna L. Reeves
Norm Reeves Dodge, Chrysler, Jeep
26755 Ynez Road
Temecula, California 92591
Aaron H. Jacoby, Esq.
Hoecker, McMahon, Jeys & Buck
355 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 3100
Los Angeles, California 90071-1591
David Dixon
Executive Director
Redevelopmerit Agency for the
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Scott F. Field, Esq.
Burke, Williams & Sorensen
3200 Bristol Street, Suite 640
Costa Mesa, California 92626
9.6 Severability. It is agreed that if any provision
of this Agreement shall be determined to be void by any court of
competent jurisdiction,.then such determination shall not affect
any other provision of this Agreement and all such other
provisions shall remain in full force and effect. It is the
intention of the parties hereto that if any provision of this
Agreement is capable of two constructions, one of which would
render the provision void and the other of which would render the
provision valid, then the provision.shall have the meaning which
renders it valid.
LAX:.
-17-
9.7 Modification. This Agreement may not be changed,
modified or amended except by writing signed by the parties
hereto, and this Agreement may not be discharged except by
performance in accordance with the terms, or by writing signed by
the parties hereto.
9.8 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in all of
the terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement.
9.9 Choice of Law. This Agreement shall be in
accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of
California.
9.10 No Brokers. Each party represents to the other
that no broker or agent has been involved in effecting this sale,
and each party shall protect and indemnify the other from any
claims by any person, firm or corporation that a broker's fee for
this sale is due as a result of the action of the indemnifying
party.
9.11 Interpretation. The parties understand and agree
that they have negotiated this Agreement between themselves and
that, in determining the meaning of, or resolving of any
ambiguity with respect to any word, phrase, or provision of this
Agreement, no uncertainty or ambiguity shall be construed or
resolved against any party under any rule of construction,
including, but not limited to, the rule provided for in Civil
Code Section 1654, as such rules pertain to parties primarily
responsible for the drafting and preparation of this Agreement.
LAX:74249.1 --18--
9.12 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in
one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an
original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the
same instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed
this Agreement on the day of , 1993.
Donna L. Reeves Trust UTD 7-25-90
By: Donna L. Reeves
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson
Attest
By: .
June S. Greek, Secretary
Approved as to Form:
By:
Scott F. Field, General Counsel
LAX: ]'4249.1
--19--
LEASE AGREEMENT
Dated as of , 1993
by and between
The Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Temecula, as Lessor
and
Donna L. Reeves Trust UTD 7-25-90,
as Lessee
LAX:'~663.2
TABLE OF CONTENTB
PAGE
10.
Premises ........................ 1
Term ...... , ..................... 1
2.1 Initial Term ................... 1
2.2 Option to Extend ................. i
Rent .......................... 2
3.1
3.2
Amount; Payment ................. 2
Triple Net Lease ................. 2
Security Deposit .................... 2
Acceptance ....................... 3
Use ........................... 3
6.1
6.2
6.3
Permitted Use .................. 3
Prohibited Uses ................. 3
Compliance with Laws ............... 3
Utilities ........................ 3
Taxes .......................... 4
8.2
8.3
8.4
Real Property Taxes ............... 4
Payment ..................... 4
Prorations .................... 4
Personal Property and Business Taxes ....... 4
Maintenance and Repairs ................. 5
.1
9.2
9.3
9.4
Lessee's Obligations ............... 5
Lessor Nonresponsibility ............. 5
Lessor's Rights ................. 5
Surrender .................... 5
Alterations ....................... 6
10.1
10.2
10.3
Lessor's Consent Required ............ 6
Performance of Work ............... 6
Removal ..................... 7
-i-
11. Insurance ........................ 7 ~
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
21.
22.
11.1
11.2
11.3
11.4
Fire and Extended Coverage Insurance ....... 7
Liability Insurance ............... 7
Waiver of Subrogation .............. 7
General Requirements ............... 8
Indemnity ......................... S
12 i Lessee' s Indemnity 8
· ' Ad Ai y ........... 9
12.2 Hazardous Materials ..........
I2.3 Non-Liability of Lessor ............. 9
Damage and Destruction ................ 10
13.1
13.2
13.3
Partial Damage or Destruction ......... 10
Total Damage or Destruction ........ 10
Damage or Destruction During Lest S~y
Days of Term .................. 10
Eminent Domain 11
14.1 Termination ...... ............ 11
14.2 Award ..................... 11
Assignment and Subletting ............... 11
Rights Reserved by Lessor ............... 11
Lessor Default .................... 11
Lessee Default and Lessor Remedies .......... 12
18.1 Lessee Default ................. 12
18.2 Lessor's Remedies ............... 12
18.3 Right to Relet ................. 13
Priority of Lease and Estoppel Certificates ....... 14
19.1
19.2
Subordination ................. 14
Estoppel Certificates ............. 14
Holding Over .............. . ...... 15
Notices 15
Attorneys' Fees .................... 16
I~:748633
-ii-
23.
Miscellaneous .....................
23.1 Validity ....................
23.2 Entire A~reement ................
23.3 Construction ..................
23.4 Waiver .....................
23.5 Brokers ....................
23.6 Time ......................
23 7 Successors
23.8 Captions .................... 17
23,9 Gender ..................... 17
23.10 Nondiscrimination ............... 17
23.11 Survival of Rights ............... 17
x. Ax:'7~Is63.2
-iii-
LEASE AGREEMENT
This Lease Agreement ("Lease**), dated for reference purposes
only, , 1993, is made by and between the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, a public body,
corporate and politic ("Lessor"), and Donna L. Reeves Trust UTD
7-25-90 ("Lessee"), who agree as follows:
1. Premises. On and subject to the terms and conditions of
this Lease, Lessor hereby 'leases to Lessee and Lessee leases from
Lessor that certain real property, together with the fixtures and
improvements located thereon, commonly known as 27500 Jefferson
Road, Temecula, California and legally described on Exhibit 1
attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein (the
"Premises" ).
2. Term.
2.1 Initial Term. Unless sooner terminated or extended as
provided in this Lease, the term of this Lease shall be twelve
(12) months, commencing and ending
· Unless otherwise expressly indicated,
whenever reference is made in this Lease to the term of this
Lease, such reference shall include any extension of the term of
this Lease.
2.2 Option to Extend. Lessor hereby grants to Lessee the
right and option to extend the term of this Lease for one (1)
additional period of twelve (12) months (the "Option Period") on
the same terms and conditions as contained in this Lease.
Lessee's exercise of such right and option shall be by written
notice (the "Option Notice") given to Lessor at least sixty (60)
days prior to the end of the initial term of this Lease. Subject
to the provisions of the next sentence, upon the giving of the
Option Notice, the term of this Lease shall be extended for the
Option Period, subject to earlier termination as elsewhere in
this Lease provided. Notwithstanding Lessee's prior exercise of
its right and option to extend the term of this Lease (whether
such exercise was, at the time, valid or invalid), Lessee shall
have no right and option to extend the term of this Lease, and
any exercise of such right and option shall be void, if at any
time from and after the date of the Option Notice until and
including the last day of the initial term of this Lease Lessee
is in default under this Lease· Notwithstanding anything in this
Lease to the contrary, during the Option Period Lessor and Lessee
shall each have the right to terminate this Lease upon the giving
of not less than thirty (30) days prior written notice of such
termination.
I..AX~v4~63.2
3. Rent.
3.1 Amount; Payment. Lessee shall pay to Lessor as rent
for the Premises monthly payments of $20,000.00. Rent shall be
payable in advance, without any deduction or offset whatever, in
lawful money of the United States, commencing on the date the
term of this Lease commences and continuing on the same day of
each succeeding month. All rent and other amounts payable by
Lessee to Lessor under this Lease shall be paid to Lesso~-at its
address set forth in Section 21 of this Lease or to such other
persons or at such other places as Lessor may designate in
writing.
3.2 Tr.~Dle Net T.ease. This Lease is what is commonly
called a "net, net, net lease", it being understood that the
Lessor shall receive the rent set forth in Section 3.1 free and
clear of any and all impositions, taxes, liens, charges or
expenses of any nature whatsoever in connection with the
ownership and operation of the Premises. In addition to the rent
reserved by Section 3.1, Lessee shall pay to the parties
respectively entitled thereto all impositions, insurance
premiums, operating charges, maintenance charges, construction
costs, and any other charges, costs and expenses which arise or
may be contemplated under provisions of this Lease during the
term hereof. All such charges, costs and expenses shall
constitute additional rent, and upon the failure of Lessee to pay
any of such costs, charges or expenses, Lessor shall have the
same rights and remedies as otherwise provided in this Lease for
the failure of Lessee to pay rent. It is the intention of the
parties hereto that this Lease shall not be terminable for any
reason by the Lessee, and that Lessee shall in no event be
entitled to any abatement of or reduction in rent payable under
this Lease, except as herein expressly provided. Any present or
future law to the contrary shall not alter this agreement of the
parties.
4. Security Deposit. On the date the term of this Lease
commences, Lessee shall deposit with Lessor $10,000.00 as secu-
rity for faithful performance of Lessee's obligations hereunder.
If Lessee fails to pay rent or other charges due hereunder, or
otherwise defaults with respect to any provision of this Lease,
Lessor may use, apply or retain all or any portion of said
deposit for the payment of any rent or other charges in default
or for the payment of any other sum to which Lessee may become
obligated by reason of Lessee's default, or to compensate Lessor
for any loss or damage which Lessor may suffer thereby. If
Lessor so uses or applies all or any portion of said deposit,
Lessee shall within ten (10) days after written demand therefor
deposit cash with Lessor in an amount sufficient to restore said
deposit to the full amount hereinabove stated. Lessor shall not
be required to keep said deposit separate from its general
accounts. If Lessee performs all of Lessee's obligations here-
under, said deposit, or so much thereof as has nottheretofore
been applied by Lessor, shall be returned, without payment of
interest or other increment for its use, to Lessee at the
expiration of the term hereof. No trust relationship is created
between Lessor and Lessee with respect to said security deposit.
5. Acceptance. Lessee acknowledges that it has heretofore been
the owner of the Premises, has occupied and used the Premises,
and is familiar with and knowledgeable regarding Lessor'~'.~title
to the Premises and the condition of the Premises and every part
thereof. Lessee accepts the Premises in their AS IS condition on
the date the term of this Lease commences, subject to all
applicable zoning, land use conditions and other matters and
restrictions, whether or not of record, affecting the Premises
and/or Lessor's title thereto. Lessor makes no representation,
warranty or agreement of any kind or nature respecting the
Premises, the condition of the Premises or any parse thereof, or
the suitability of the Premises for the use permitted hereunder
or the conduct of Lessee's business thereon.
6. use.
6.1 Permitted Use. Lessee shall use the Premises solely
for the purpose of operating thereon an automobile dealership
engaged in the business of selling, leasing and servicing new and
used automobiles, and Lessee shall not use or permit the Premises
to be used for any other purpose.
6.2 Prohib{ted Uses. Lessee shall not do or permit to be
done in or about the Premises anything that is illegal or
unlawful or that is of a hazardous or dangerous nature. Lessee
shall not do or permit to be done in or about the Premises
anything that will increase the rate of, or cause cancellation
of, any insurance for the Premises. Lessee shall not cause,
maintain or permit any nuisance in or about the Premises or
commit any waste therein.
6.3 Compliance w4th T~WS. Lessee shall, at Lessee!s sole
cost and expense, comply promptly with all applicable statutes,
laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, orders, restrictions of
record, and requirements in effect during the term of this Lease
or any part of the term of this Lease regulating the Premises,
the use by Lessee of the Premises, and/or the operation by Lessee
of its business therein. [insert environmental law compliance].
7. Utilities. Lessee, at its own cost and expense, shall pay
before delinquency for all water, gas, heat, electricity, garbage
disposal, sewer charges, telephone, and any other utility or
service charges relating to the Premises. Lessor shall have no
liability to Lessee for any interruption in any such utilities or
services and Lessee shall not be entitled to any abatement or
reduction in rent due to any such interruption.
-3-
8. Taxes.
8.1 Real Property Taxes. Lessee shall pay, as provided in
Section 8.2, all "Real Property Taxes" (as hereafter defined)
which maybe levied, assessed or imposed against or become a lien
upon the Premises or any part thereof during the term of this
Lease. The term "Real Property Taxes" as used in this Lease
shall mean and include real estate taxes, assessments (special or
otherwise) including impositions for the purpose of funding.
special assessment districts, water and sewer rent, rates and
charges (including license fees), and all other taxes, govern-
mental levies and charges of every kind and nature whatsoever
(and whether or not the same presently exists or shall be enacted
in the future), and any substitutes therefor, which may during
the term of this Lease be levied, assessed, imposed, become a
lien upon, or due and payable with respect to, out of or for:
(a) the Premises or any part thereof, or the use, occupancy of
possession thereof; (b) any interest of Lessor and/or Lessee
(including any legal or equitable interest of Lessor-or its-
mortgagee, if any) in the Premises or the Lease; (c) the rents
receivable by Lessor, including gross receipt taxes, business
taxes.and business and occupation taxes; and (d) the ownership,
leasing, operation, maintenance, alteration or repair of the
Premises.
8.2 Payment. Lessee shall pay all Real Property Taxes
directly to the appropriate taxing authority. Lessee shall pay
all Real Property Taxes before delinquency and shall provide
Lessor with evidence of such payment within ten (10) days after
the making of such payment and also within ten (10) days follow-
ing the written request of Lessor. In the event Lessor shall
receive any bill respecting Real Property Taxes payable by Lessee
under this Lease, Lessor shall deliver the same to Lessee at
least fifteen (15) days prior to delinquency. Lessor's failure
to so deliver any such bill to Lessee shall not relieve Lessee of
its obligation to make the payments represented thereby, provided
that Lessor and not Lessee shall be liable for any interest or
penalties for late payment reasonably resulting from such
failure.
8.3 Prorations. If this Lease shall terminate on any date
other than the last day of a tax fiscal year, the amount payable
by Lessee during the tax fiscal year in which such termination
occurs shall be prorated on the basis which the number of days
from the commencement of said tax fiscal year to and including
said termination date bears to 365. A similar proration shall be
made for the tax fiscal year in which the term commences.
8.4 Personal Property and Business Taxes. Lessee shall pay
before delinquency any and all taxes levied, assessed or imposed
upon Lessee's leasehold improvements, equipment, furniture, trade
fixtures and any personal property located in, on or about the
I. AX;74863.2 '4 ....
Premises. Lessee shall pay before delinquency any and all
special taxes and assessments or license fees levied, assessed or
imposed relating to the use of the Premises as permitted by this
Lease and the conduct of Lessee's business on the Premises.
9. Maintenance and Repairs.
9.1 Tassee's ObliQations. Lessee shall keep in good order,
condition and repair the Premises and every part thereoPen'struc-
tural and nonstructural (whether or not such portion of the
Premises re~uiring repair or the means of repairing the same are
reasonably or readily accessible to Lessee, and whether or not
the need for such repairs occurs as a result of Lessee's use, any
prior use, the elements or the age of such portion of the
Premises), including, without limitation, all plumbing, heating,
air conditioning, ventilating, electrical, lighting facilities
and equipment, fixtures, walls (interior and exterior), founda-
tions, ceilings, roofs (interior and exterior), floors, windows,
doors, plate glass and skylights located on the Premises, and all
landscaping, driveways, parking lots, fences and signs located on
the Premises and sidewalks and parkways adjacent to the Premises.
9.2 Lessor Nonresponsib{l~tv. It is intended by the
parties hereto that Lessor have no obligation, in any manner
whatsoever, to repair and maintain the Premises nor any part
thereof nor the equipment therein, whether structural or
nonstructural, all of which obligations are intended to be that
of the Lessee under Section 9.1 hereof. Lessee expressly waives
the benefit of any statute now or hereafter in effect which would
otherwise afford Lessee the right to make repairs at Lessor's
expense or to terminate this Lease because of Lessor's failure to
keep the Premises in good order, condition and repair.
9.3 Lessor's Rights. Without limiting any other right or
remedy which Lessor may have under this Lease or at law or in
equity, if Lessee fails to perform Lessee's obligations under
this Article 9, Lessor may (but shall not be required to) enter
upon the Premises and put the same in good order, condition and
repair, and the cost thereof, together with interest thereon to
the date of payment at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum,
shall immediately become due and payable as additional rent to
Lessor.
9.4 Surrender. On the expiration of the term of this
Lease, or on any sooner termination of the term of this Lease,
Lessee shall surrender the Premises to Lessor in the same
condition as when received, broom clean, ordinary wear and tear
only accepted. Lessee shall repair any damage to the Premises
occasioned by the removal of Lessee's trade fixtures, furnish-
ings, equipment and other personal property pursuant to Section
10.3, which repair shall include the patching and filling of
holes and repair of all structural damage.
-5-
10. Alterations-
10.1 x.essor's consent Re~u4red. Lessee shall not make any
alterations, improvements, additions or changes in, on or about
the Premises, except .for nonstructural alterations not exceeding
in the aggregate $5,000.00 in cost during the term of this Lease,
without first obtaining Lessor's prior written consent in each
instance, which consent Lessor may ~rant or withhold in its sole
discretion- Lessor may require that Lessee remove any-o~-all of
such alterations, improvements, additions or changes at the
· expiration of the term of this Lease, and restore the Premises to
their prior condition. Lessor may require Lessee to provide
Lessor, at Lessee's sole cost and expense, a lien and completion
bond in an amount equal to one and one-half times the estimated
cost of such improvements, to insure Lessor against any liability
for mechanic's and materialmen's liens and to insure completion
of the work. Should Lessee make any alterations, improvements,
additions or changes without the prior approval of Lessor when
required, Lessor may require that Lessee remove any or all of the
same.
10.2 Performance of Work. Any alterations, improvements,
additions or changes in, on or about the Premises that Lessee
shall desire to make and which require the consent of the Lessor
shall be presented to Lessor in written form, with proposed
detailed plans. If Lessor shall give its consent, the consent
shall, in addition to any other conditions imposed by Lessor, be
deemed conditioned upon Lessee acquiring all necessary permits
and approvals from appropriate governmental agencies, the
furnishing of a copy thereof to Lessor prior to the commencement
of the work, and the compliance by Lessee with all conditions
thereof in a prompt and expeditious manner. Lessee shall pay,
when due, all claims for labor and materials furnished or alleged
to have been furnished to or for Lessee at or for use in the
Premises, which claims are or may be secured by any mechanic's or
materialmen's liens against the Premises or any interest therein.
Lessee shall give Lessor not less than ten (10) days written
notice prior to the commencement of any work in the Premises, and
Lessor shall have the right to post notices of nonresponsibility
in, on or about the Premises as provided by law. If Lessee
shall, in good faith, contest the validity of any such lien,
claim or demand, then Lessee shall, at its sole cost and expense,
defend itself and Lessor against the same and shall pay and
satisfy any adverse judgment that may be rendered thereon before
the enforcement thereof against the Lessor or the Premises, upon
the condition that if Lessor shall require, Lessee shall furnish
to Lessor a surety bond satisfactory to Lessor in an amount equal
to one and one-quarter times the amount of such contested lien,
claim or demand indemnifying Lessor against liability for the
same and holding the Premises free from the effect of such lien
or claim. In addition, Lessor may require Lessee to pay Lessor's
LAX:748~3.2
-6-
attorneys' fees and costs in participating in such action if
Lessor shall be required todo so.
10.3 Removal. Unless Lessor requires their removal, as set
forth in Section 10.1, all alterations., improvements, additions
and changes which may be made on the Premises shall become the
property of Lessor and remain upon and be surrendered with the
Premises at the expiration of the term of this Lease. Notwith-
standing the provisions of this Section 10.3, Lessee'e trade
fixtures, equipment, furnishings and other personal property,
other than that which is affixed to the Premises so that it
cannot be removed without material damage to the Premises, shall
remain the property of Lessee and may be removed by Lessee
subject to the provisions of Section 9.4.
11. Insurance.
11.1 Fire and Extended Coveraae Tnsurance. Throughout the
term of this Lease, at Lessee's sole expense, Lessee shall keep
in force on the building and other improvements that are a part
of the Premises a policy of fire and extended coverage insurance,
with vandalism and malicious mischief endorsements, to the extent
of at least one hundred percent (100%) of the full replacement
cost thereof, without deduction for depreciation. Such policy
may be subject to a deductible of not to exceed $20,000.00. The
insurance policy shall be issued in the name of Lessor and at
Lessor's option, shall name Lessor's lender, if any, as an addi-
tional insured. The proceeds from any such insurance shall be
paid to Lessor who agrees, subject to the requirements of its
lender, if any, to make the proceeds therefrom available for the
restoration of any destruction to the Premises to the extent
required by Section 13.1 of this Lease.
11.2 LiabilitV Insurance. Throughout the term of this
Lease, at Lessee's sole expense, Lessee shall keep in force a
policy of combined single limit bodily injury and property damage
insurance insuring Lessor and Lessee against any liability
arising out of the ownership, use, occupancy or maintenance of
the Premises. Such insurance shall be a combined single limit
policy for personal and bodily injury and property damage in an
amount of not less than Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000) per
occurrence. Such policy may be subject to a deductible of not to
exceed $5,000.00. The policy shall insure performance by Lessee
of the indemnity provisions of Section 12.1, but the limits of
such insurance shall not limit the liability of Lessee under this
Lease.
11.3 Waiver of Subrogation. Lessee and Lessor each hereby
waive any and all rights of recovery against the other and
against the officers, employees, agents and representatives of
the other for loss of or damage to such waiving party or its
property or the property of others under its control to the
I,~C:74863.2
extent that such loss or damage is insured against under any
insurance policy in force at the time of such loss or damage.
Lessee shall, upon obtaining the policies of insurance required
under this Lease, give written notice to the insurance carrier or
carriers that the foregoing mutual waiver of subrogation is
contained in this Lease.
11.4 General Reau~rements. All policies of insurance
required under this Lease shall be with responsible companies
admitted to do business in the State of California. Insurance
required to be maintained by Lessee may be maintained in the form
of so-called "blanket" policies insuring the Premises as well as
other property owned or occupied by Lessee so long as Lessor, and
at Lessor's option, Lessor's lender, if any, are named insureds
and provided that the coverage required hereunder is not thereby
diminished. As often as any such policy shall expire or termi-
nate, renewal or additional policies shall be procured and main-
tained in like manner and to like extent. Lessee shall furnish
to Lessor certificates of such-insurance at the commencement of
the term of this Lease and upon any renewal or replacement of
such insurance. All policies of insurance must contain a provi-
sion that the company writing such policy will give Lessor thirty
(30) days advance written notice of any cancellation or lapse of
the effective date or any reduction in the amounts of insurance.
In addition to any other rights which Lessor may have under this
Lease or at law or in equity, if Lessee fails to purchase, renew
or maintain any insurance policies required herein, Lessor shall
have the right at its option to purchase, at Lessee's sole
expense, any such insurance and Lessee shall immediately pay the
cost thereof, plus interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per
annum until the date paid, to the Lessor. All policies required
hereunder shall be written as primary policies and not contri-
buting with or in excess of any coverage which Lessor may carry.
12. Indemnity.
12.1 Lessee's Indemnity. Lessee shall indemnify and hold
harmless Lessor, the City of Temecula, and their respective
officials, officers, agents, representatives and employees, from
and against any and all claims, actions, liabilities, losses,
costs and expenses, arising from Lessee's use of the Premises or
from the conduct of Lessee's business or from any activity, work
or things done, permitted or suffered by Lessee in or about the
Premises, and shall further indemnity and hold harmless Lessor,
the City of Temecula, and their respective officials, officers,
agents, representatives and employees, from any against any and
all claims, actions, losses, liabilities, costs and expenses
arising from any negligence of the Lessee, or any of the Lessee's
agents, contractors, representatives or employees, and from and
against all costs, attorneys' fees, expenses and liabilities
incurred in defense of any such claim or any action or proceeding
brought therein; provided, however, that the foregoing indemnity
-8-
shall not extend to any claims, actions, liabilities, losses,
costs and expenses to the extent directly arising from the
negligent or willful acts or omissions of Lessor, the City of
Temecula, or their respective officials, officers, agents,
representatives, or employees. In case any action or proceeding
be brought by reason of any matter for which indemnification is
provided hereunder, Lessee, at Lessor's option and upon notice
from Lessor, shall defend the same at Lessee's expense by counsel
reasonably satisfactory to Lessor. ;'~i-
12.2 Hazardous Mater{als Tndemn~ty. Throughout the term of
this Lease, Lessee shall be responsible, at Lessee's sole
expense, for compliance with all applicable laws, regulations,
codes and ordinances concerning "Hazardous Materials" (as herein-
after defined). Lessee hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harm-
less Lessor, the City of Temecula, and their respective
officials, officers, representatives, employees and agents, from
and against any and all claims, actions, losses, liabilities,
judgments, costs and expenses (including, without limitation,
attorneys' fees and all foreseeable and unforeseeable consequen-
tial damages), directly or indirectly arising out of or connected
with (a) the use, generation, storage, disposal, release or
threatened release of "Hazardous Materials" in, on, under or
about the Premises by Lessee or any other person, or the presence
or use of fuel tanks located in, on, under or about the Premises,
and (b) any required or necessary repair, cleanup or detoxifica-
tion and the preparation of any closure or other required plans,
whether such action is required or necessary prior to or follow-
ing the commencement date of the term of this Lease, to the full
extent that such action is attributable, directly or indirectly,
to the presence, use, generation, storage, disposal, release or
threatened release of "Hazardous Materials" in, on, under or
about the Premises or the presence or use of fuel tanks located
in, on, under or about the Premises. As used herein, "Hazardous
Materials" means any flammable explosives, radioactive materials,
asbestos, PCB's, hazardous waste, toxic substances or related
materials, including, without limitation, substances defined as
"hazardous substances," hazardous materials," or "toxic
substances" in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, 42 USC Section
9601, et sea,, the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, 49 USC
Section 1801, et sea., the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act, 42 USC Section 6901, et sea., any other present or future
federal, state or local law applicable to the Premises or the
Shopping Center, and the rules and regulations adopted or
promulgated under or pursuant to any of'the foregoing laws.
12.3 Non-T.iabil~ty of Lessor. Lessee hereby agrees that
Lessor shall not be liable for injury to Lessee's business or any
loss of income therefrom, or for any damage to the goods, wares,
merchandise or other proper~y of Lessee, Lessee's employees,
invitees, customers, or any other person in or about the
-9-
Premises, nor shall Lessor be liable for injury to the person of
Lessee, Lessee'.s employees, invitees, customers, or any other
person in or about the Premises, whether such damage or injury is
caused by or results from fire, steam, electricity, gas, water or
rain, or from the breakage, leakage, obstruction or other defects
of pipes, sprinklers, wires, appliances, plumbing, air condition-
ing or lighting fixtures, or from other similar cause, whether
said damage or injury. results from conditions arising upon the
Premises or from other sources or places, and regardles=~Df.
whether the cause of such damage or injury or the means of
repairing same is inaccessible to Lessee.
13. Damace and Destruction.
13.1 Partial Damace or Destruction. If the Premises or any
part thereof are damaged or destroyed from any cause whatsoever,
whether or not such damage or destruction is covered by any
insurance required to be maintained under this Lease, and if
Lessor determines, in its reasonable judgment, that such damage
or destruction can be repaired within sixty (60) days following
the date of such damage or destruction, Lessee shall, at its sole
cost and expense, repair, restore and rebuild the Premises to its
condition existing immediately prior to such damage or destruc-
tion and this Lease shall remain in full force and effect. Such
repair, restoration and rebuilding shall be promptly commenced
after such damage or destruction has occurred and shall be dili-
gently pursued to completion. To the extent that such damage or
destruction is covered by insurance required to be maintained
under this Lease, Lessor shall make the proceeds of such insur-
ance available to Lessee to be used in connection with such
repair, restoration and rebuilding.
13.2 Total Damace or Destruction. If the Premises or any
part thereof are damaged or destroyed from any cause whatsoever,
whether or not such damage or destruction is covered by any
insurance required to be maintained under this Lease, and if
Lessor shall, in Lessor's reasonable judgment, determine that
such damage or destruction cannot be repaired within sixty (60)
days following the date of such damage or destruction, then this
Lease shall, upon written notice from Lessor, terminate as of the
date of such damage or destruction. In such event, Lessor shall
be entitled to receive and retain all proceeds payable with'
respect to such damage or destruction under policies of insurance
required to be maintained under this Lease.
13.3 Damace or Destruction During Last Sixty Days of Term.
If the Premises or any part thereof are damaged or destroyed from
any cause whatsoever during the last sixty (60) days of the term
of this Lease, whether or not such damage or destruction is
covered by any insurance required to be maintained under this
Lease, and if Lessor shall, in its reasonable judgment, determine
that such damage or destruction cannot be repaired within ten
I.AX:74863.2 --10-- ' '~"
(10) days following the date of such. damage or destruction, then
this Lease shall automatically terminate as of the date of such
damage or destruction. In such event, Lessor shall be entitled
to receive and retain all proceeds payable with respect to such
damage or destruction under policies of insurance required to be
maintained under this Lease.
14. Eminent Domain.
14.1 Termination. If all or any portion of the Premises
shall be taken or appropriated by any public or quasi-public
authority under the power of eminent domain (or similar law
authorizing the involuntaz7 taking of private property, which
shall include a sale in lieu thereof to a public body), this
Lease shall terminate effective as of the date possession is
taken by said authority.
14.2 Award. Lessor shall be entitled to any and all
income, rent, award, and any interest thereon whatsoever which
may be paid or made in connection with any such taking or
appropriation; provided, however, that nothing herein contained
shall be deemed to deny to Lessee its right to claim from the
condemning authority compensation or damages for its trade
fixtures, personal property or relocation expenses.
15. Assignment and Subletting. Lessee shall not voluntarily,
involuntarily, or by operation of law, assign, transfer, hypothe-
cats, or otherwise encumber this Lease or Lessee's interest
therein or sublet the Premises or any part thereof or permit the
use or occupancy thereof by any third person, it being the under-
standing and agreement of Lessor and Lessee that this Lease and
Lessee's interest therein is not assignable by Lessee, in whole
or in part, and that the Premises may not be sublet, used or
possessed, in whole or in part, at any time by any person other
than Lessee.
1G. Riahts Reserved byTessot. Upon reasonable prior notice,
Lessee shall permit Lessor or its agents to enter the Premises at
reasonable business times for the purpose of: (a) Inspection of
the Premises; (b) Showing the Premises to persons wishing to
purchase or make a mortgage loan upon the same; or (c) Posting
"For Lease" signs and showing the Premises to persons wishing to
rent the Premises during the last two (2) months of the term of
this Lease. No exercise by Lessor of any rights herein reserved
shall entitle Lessee to any damage for any injury or
inconvenience occasioned thereby nor to any abatement of rent.
17. Lessor Default. If Lessor shall be in default of any
covenant of this Lease to be performed by it, Lessee, prior to
exercising any right or remedy it may have against Lessor on
account thereof, shall give Lessor a thirty (30) day written
notice of such default, specifying the nature of such default.
-11-
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary elsewhere in this Lease,
Lessee agrees that if the default specified in said notice is of
such nature that it can be cured by Lessor, but cannot with
reasonable diligence be cured within said thirty (30) day period,
then Lessor shall not be deemed to be in default so long as
Lessor within said thirty (30) day period shall have commenced
the cur'ing thereof and shall continue thereafter to diligently
cause such curing to proceed to completion.
18. Lessee Default and T~ssor Remedies.
18.1 T~ssee Default. The occurrence of any of the
following shall constitute a default of this Lease by Lessee:
(a) The failure by Lessee to pay when due any of the
rent or any other payment required to be paid by Lessee
hereunder, as and when due, where such failure continues for
three (3) days after written notice from Lessor~ or
(b) The failure by Lessee to observe and perform any
of the provisions of Article 11 of this Lease to be observed or
performed by Lessee; or
(c) The failure by Lessee to observe and perform any
other provision of this Lease to be observed or performed by
Lessee, where such failure continues for thirty (30) days after
written notice thereof from Lessor~ provided, that if the nature
of such default is such that the same cannot reasonably be cured
within said period, Lessee shall not be deemed to be in default
if it shall within said period commence such curing and
thereafter diligently prosecutes the same to completiony or
(d) Abandonment or vacation of the Premises; or
(e) The inability of Lessee to generally pay its
obligations when due, an assignment for the benefit of Lessee's
creditors, the attachment of any material asset of Lessee which
is not bonded against or released within fifteen (15) days of
attachment, Lessee's filing of a petition for relief under the
Bankruptcy Code or any similar statute, or the failure of Lessee
to cause to be dismissed any petition of involuntary bankruptcy
filed against Lessee within sixty (60) days after filing~ or
(f) Lessee's failure to discharge or stay enforcement
of any judgment against Lessee within thirty (30) days after
entry thereof.
18.2 Lessor's Remedies. In the event of any default as
aforesaid by Lessee, then in addition to any and all other rights
and remedies available to Lessor at law or in equity, Lessor
shall have the right to immediately terminate this Lease and all
rights of Lessee hereunder by giving written notice to Lessee of
L,~:*7,~S~3.2 --12--
its election to do so. If Lessor shall elect to terminate this
Lease, this it may recover from Lessee:
(a) The worth at the time of the award of the unpaid
rent payable hereunder which had been earned at the date of such
termination; plus
· - (b) The worth at the time of the award of the amount
by which the unpaid rent which would have been earned after .
termination and until the time of the award exceeds the amount of
such rental loss which Lessee proves could have been reasonably
avoided; plus
(c) The worth at the time of the award of the amount
by which the unpaid rent for the belance of the term after the
time of the award exceeds the amount of such rental loss which
Lessee proves could be reasonably avoided; plus
(d) Any other amounts necessary to compensate Lessor
for all detriment proximately caused by Lessee's failure to
perform its obligations hereunder (including reasonable attor-
neys' and accountants' fees, costs of repair and refurbishment,
costs of recovering possession, costs of new tenant improvements
and leasing commission).
As used in subparagraphs (a) and (b) above, the "worth
at the time of the award" is computed by allowing interest at the
rate of ten percent (10%) per annum. As used in subparagraph (c)
above, the "worth at the time of the award" is computed by dis-
counting such amount at the discount rate of the Federal Reserve
Bank of San Francisco at the time of the award plus one percent
(1%).
18.3 Right to Relet. In the event of any default as
aforesaid by Lessee, Lessor shall also have the right, with such
notice as required by law, with or without terminating this
Lease, to re-enter the Premises and remove all property and
persons therefrom, and any such property may be removed and
stored in a public warehouse or elsewhere at the cost and for the
account of Lessee. If Lessor shall elect to re-enter as above
provided or shall take possession of said Premises pursuant to
legal proceedings or pursuant to any notice provided by law, and
if Lessor has not elected to terminate this Lease, Lessor may
either recover all rental as it becomes due or relet the Premises
or any part or parts thereof for such term or terms and upon such
provisions as Lessor, in its reasonable judgment, may deem
advisable and shall have the right to make repairs to and
alterations of the Premises. If Lessor shall elect to relet as
aforesaid, then rental received by Landlord therefrom shall be
applied as follows:
-13-
(a) to the payment of all costs' and expenses incurred
by Lessor in connection with such reletting;
(b) to the payment of the cost of any alterations of
and repairs to the Premises reasonably necessary to place the
Premises in a condition to be rented; and
(c) to the payment of rent due and unpaid hereunder
and the residue, if any, shall be held by Lessor and applied.in
payment of future rent as the same may become due and payable
hereunder and to any damages which Lessor is otherwise entitled
to under this Lease. Should that portion of such rental received
from such reletting during any month, which is applied to the
payment of rent hereunder, be less than the rent payable here-
under during that month by Lessee, then Lessee shall pay such
deficiency to Lessor forthwith upon demand, and said deficiency
shall be calculated and paid monthly.
No.re-entry or taking possession of the Premises by
Lessor under this Article shall be construed as an election to
terminate this Lease unless a written notice of such intention is
given to Lessee or unless the termination thereof be adjudged by
a court of ~ompetent jurisdiction. Notwithstanding any reletting
without termination by Lessor because of Lessee's default, Lessor
may at any time after such reletting elect to terminate this
Lease because of such default.
19. PrioritV of Lease and Estoppel Certificates.
19.1 Subordination. At Lessor's election, this Lease shall
be subordinate to any and all trust deeds, mortgages, or other
security instruments, ground leases, or leaseback financing
arrangements now existing or which may hereafter be executed
covering the Premises and/or the land underlying the same, and
for the full amount of all advances made or to be made thereunder
together with interest thereon, and subject to all the provi-
sions, modifications and replacements thereof, all without the
necessity of having further instruments executed by Lesse.e to
effectuate the same. Lessee agrees to execute, acknowledge and
deliver upon written request by Lessor any and all documents or
instruments which are or may be reasonably necessary or proper to
more fully and certainly assure the subordination of this Lease
to any such trust deeds, mortgages or other security instruments,
ground leases, or leasebacks.
19.2 EstoDpel Certificates. Lessee, within ten (10) days
following written notice from Lessor, shall execute and deliver
to Lessor a certificate stating that this Lease is unmodified and
in full force and effect, or in full force and effect as modi-
fied, and stating the modifications. The.certificate shall also
state the amount of rent, the dates to which such rent has been
paid in advance, if any, and acknowledge that there are no~ any
LAX :74863.2 -- 14 -- -
uncured defaults on the part of Lessor or 'specifying such
defaults if any are claimed, and shall state such other matters
concerning this Lease and the Premises as are reasonably
requested.
20. Hold~na Over. If, without the execution of a new lease or
written extension of this Lease, or without the consent of
Lessor, Lessee shallhold over after the expiration of the term
of this Lease, Lessee shall be deemed to be occupying th~-
Premises as a tenant from month-to-month, which tenancy may be
terminated as provided by law. During said tenancy, the monthly
rent payable to Lessor by Lessee shall be one hundred fifty
percent (150%) of the monthly rent as set forth in this Lease,
and upon all of the other terms, covenants and conditions set
forth in this Lease so far as the same are applicable.
21. Notices. Wherever in this Lease it shall be required or
permitted that notice, approval, advice, consent or demand be
given or served by either party to this Lease to or on the other,
the same shall be given or served and shall not be deemed to have
been duly given or served unless in writing and personally
delivered or forwarded by certified or registered mail, return
receipt reqRested, postage prepaid addressed to the address of
the parties as specified below. Notice shall be deemed given
upon personal delivery or three (3) days (exclusive of Saturdays,
Sundays and legal holidays) after mailing as aforesaid. Either
party may change such address by written notice given as
aforesaid. Each party's initial notice address is:
If to Lessee:
Donna L. Reeves
Norm Reeves Dodge, Chrysler, Jeep
26755 Ynez Road
Temecula, California 92591
Copy to:
Aaron H. Jacoby, Esq.
Hoecker, McMahon, Jeys & Buck
355 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 3100
Los Angeles, California 90071-1591
If to Lessor:
David Dixon
Executive Director
RedevelopmentAgency for the
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Copy to:
Scott F. Field, Esq.
Burke, Willjams & Sorensen
3200 Bristol Street, Suite 640
Costa Mesa, California 92626
-15-
22. Attorneys' Fees. Should either party hereto institute any
action or proceeding in court to enforce any provision hereof or
for damages or for declaratory or o~her relief hereunder, the
prevailing party shall be entitled to receive from the losing
party, in addition to court costs, such amount as the court may
adjudge to be reasonable as attorneys' fees for services rendered
to said prevailing party, and said amount may be made a part of
the judgment against the losing party.
{Q.,
2 3. ~isce~ ~ aneous.
23.1 Validity. If any provision of this Lease shall be
determined to be void or voidable by any court of competent
jurisdiction, such determination shall not affect any other
provision of this Lease and all such other provisions shall
remain in effect. It is the intention of the parties hereto that
if any provision of this Lease is capable of two constructions,
one of which would render the provision void or voidable, the
provision shall have the meaning which renders it valid.
23.2 Entire Agreement. The entire agreement between the
parties hereto respecting the leasing of the Premises is set
forth in this Lease, and any agreement hereafter made shall be
ineffective to change, modify, alter or discharge it in whole or
in part unless such agreement is in writing and signed by both
said parties. All negotiations and oral agreements acceptable to
both parties hereto respecting the leasing of the Premises have
been merged into and are included in this Lease.
23.3 Construction. The laws of the State of California
shall govern the validity, performance and enforcement of this
Lease. This Lease has been negotiated by Lessor and Lessee and
this Lease shall not be construed either for or against Lessor or
Lessee as the drafter hereof, but its construction shall be at
all times in accord with the general tenor of the language so as
to reach a fair and equitable result.
23.4 Waiver. A waiver of any breach or default shall not
be a waiver of any other breach or default. Lessor's consent to
or approval of any act by Lessee requiring Lessor's consent or
approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary
Lessor's consent to or approval of any subsequent similar act by
Lessee.
23.5 Brokers. Each party represents that it has not had
any dealings with any real estate broker, finder, or other
person, with respect to this Lease in any manner. Each party
shall hold harmless the other party from all damages resulting
from any claims that may be asserted against the other party by
any broker, finder, or other person, with whom the other party
has or purportedly has dealt.
h~x:~4~3.2 - 16 - ~
23.6 Time, Time is of the essence with respect to the
performance of each of the covenants and agreements of this
Lease.
23.7 Successors. Each and all of the provisions of this
Lease shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the
parties hereto and their respective personal representatives,
successors and assigns, subject at all times to all provisions
and restrictions elsewhere in this Lease respecting the-;~-
assignment, transfer, encumbering or subletting by Lesse~ of all
or any part of the Premises or Lessee's interest in this Lease.
23.8 CaDtlons. The captions and table of contents shown on
this Lease are for convenience of reference only and shall not,
in any manner, be utilized to construe the scope or the intent of
any provisions thereof.
23.9 Gender. Unless some other meaning and intent are
apparent from the context, the plural shall include the singular
and vice versa. Masculine, feminine and neuter words shall be
interchangeable.
23.10 Nondiscrimination. Lessee covenants by and for
itself, its heirs, executors, administrators, successors and
assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that
this Lease is made and accepted upon and subject to the following
conditions: There shall be no discrimination against or segrega-
tion of, any person or group of persons on account of sex, race,
age, religion, handicap, marital status, color, creed, ancestry
or national origin in the leasing, subleasing, transferring, use,
or enjoyment of the Premises herein leased, nor shall Lessee
itself or any person claiming under or through it, establish or
permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or
segregation with reference to the selection, location, number,
use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees or
vendees in the Premises herein leased.
23.11 Survival of Riahts. All rights and remedies of
Lessor under this Lease, including, without limitation, ~ights to
indemnification, shall survive the expiration or earlier
termination of the term of this Lease.
-17 -
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Lease Agreement by their respective duly authorized officers,
agents or representatives as of the date first above written.
Donna L. Reeves UTD 7-25-90
By
Donna L. Reeves
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
By
Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson
Attest:
By
June S. Greek, Secretary
Approved as to Form:
By
Scott F. Field, General Counsel
LAX:74863.2
-18-
ITEM
5
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Redevelopment Agency/Executive Director
General Counsel/Finance Officer
December 14, 1993
Use of Redevelopment Bond Proceeds for the Construction of City
Administrative Offices and Corporate Yard
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
"A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROPRIATING $7 MILLION DOLLARS FROM THE SERIES
1993 TAX ALLOCATION BONDS TO BE USED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES AND A CORPORATION YARD NORTH
OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND WEST OF DIAZ ROAD"
DISCUSSION: On or about February 23, 1993, the Agency issued its Series 1993
Tax Allocation Bonds in the amount of $17,355,000. The proceeds of these bonds were
intended to be used to fund the acquisition, planning, design, improvement and equipping
of various public facilities in the City. At least 90% of these funds must be used for
construction of public facilities such as buildings and streets. These bonds will be repaid
with the tax increment revenues. The maturity date of the bonds runs from 1994 through
2013, and the interest rate varies from 5.25% to 5.50%.
The City has recently been presented with the opportunity to obtain 8 acres Of land within
tract 21383, without cost to the City, so long as the property is to be used for City
administrative offices. The proposed site for the City administrative offices and corporate
yard is located within the Rancho Core Business Park, which is in substantial economic
distress. The Business Park has already been through a foreclosure and previously has
been in default on its property taxes and special assessments. The Business Park is not
located within the Redevelopment Project Area, but is adjacent to it. Locating the City
administrative offices and corporate yard within the Business Park will help promote
development not only of the Business Park, but also the surrounding Redevelopment
Project Area. On the other hand, failure of the Business Park may result not only in
economic decline within the Business Park itself, but throughout the Redevelopment
Project Area.
R:~Agertda. Rpt\CityAdmn. RDA'
RDA Agenda Report - City Administrative Offices
December 14, 1993
Page 2.
The estimated cost of constructing City administrative offices, a corporate yard and
abutting street and utility improvements is $7.0 Million. The estimated cost of using
Series 1993 bond proceeds, including interest IDayments, to pay for the cost of this project
is $11,576,309.00 payable over 20 years. By funding this project through redevelopment
bond proceeds, the Redevelopment Agency will be not only be encouraging economic
growth within the Project Area, but will also be insuring the construction of permanent
City facilities which will enable the City to provide the full whole range of municipal
services to the residents of the Redevelopment Project Area as well as the entire City.
It should be noted that after January 1, 1994, AB1290 prohibits
redevelopment agencies from funding city halls or city administrative offices. On the other
hand, it was anticipated that at the time the 1993 tax allocation bonds were sold, the
bond proceeds would be used for public facilities such as city administrative offices.
Accordingly, Agency Staff recommends that the Agency appropriate $7,000,000 of Series
1993 bond proceeds to construct the City administrative offices and a corporate yard on
property to be dedicated to the City within Tract 21383.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Resolution of Approval
- Map of Tract 21383
R:%Agenda. Rpt~,CityAdmn. RDA 2
· -~- 1LESOLUTION NO. RDA 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE I~EDEVFJ,OPMENT AGENCY
OF THE CITY OF ~ APPROPRIATING $7
MBJ-TON DOT~TA.RS FROM SERIES 1993 TAX
AT-TGCATION BONDS TO BE USED FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
AND A CORPORATION YARD NORTH OF
WINCHESTER ROAD AND WEST OF DIAZ ROAD
THE I~EBEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula hereby
finds, determines and declares as follows:
A. On or about February 23, 1993, the Redevelopmerit Agency of the City of
Temecula issued Series 1993, Tax Allocation Bonds in the amount of $17,355,000. The
proceeds of the Series 1993 bonds were to fund the acquisition, planning, design,
consU'uction, improvement and equipping of various public facilities, including the City's
administrative offices and corporate yard. The debt service on the 1993 Series Bonds will be
paid with tax increment funds received by the Agency.
B. The City of Temecuh anticipates acquiring Lots 20-25, 29, and 30 of Tract
21383, located north of Winchester Road and west of Diaz Road (the "Property"). The
Property is located adjacent to the Redevelopment Project Area. The Property will be
granted to the City on the condition that it be used for the construction and operation of City
administrative offices.
C. The City intends to construct its permanent adminisWative offices and
corporate yard on the property (the ("Project"). The Project will be of substantial benefit to
the Redevelopmerit Project Area in that it will allow the City to provide essential municipal
services to the residents throughout the Project Area not presen~y available, and provide an
aesthetic improvement to the area.
D. The Property is located within a business park that has gone through
foreclosure and which is in default on property taxes and assessments. Given the proximity
of of the park to the Project Area, if the park should not develop, it will not only result in
blight within the park, but result in further economic deterioration and blight within the
Project Area. The Project will provide a significant impetus to development of the business
park and the Project area.
E. The Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1-1988 provides for
the installation and construction of public facilities which benefit the Project Area.
!~so~.nla~007 -1-
Section 2. Based upon the foreoing, the Redevelopment Agency of the City
of Temecula hereby appropriates $7 Million from the 1993 Series Tax Allocation Bonds to
be used for the construction of City administrative offices, a corporate yard, and the abutting
street and utility improvements.
Section 3.
Resoluition.
The Executive Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this
PASSEn, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of
,1993.
Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that
the foregoing Resolution No. RDA 93L was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting
of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , 1993, by the
following roll call vote:
AGENCY MEMBER:
NOES:
AGENCY MEMBER:
AGENCY MEMBER:
June S. Greek, City Clerk