Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout022294 CC AgendaAGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER - 28816 Pujol Street FEBRUARY 22, 1994 - 7:00 PM At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM EXECUTIVE SESSION: 6:00 PM - pursuant to Government Code Sections: 1. § 54956.8 Real E~tate Negotiation CenferanGe with Real Property Negotiator: Property. Parking Lot to Old Town Temecula Senior Center located st 41945 6th Street. Negotiating Parties - Kemper Real Emte Development Corporation and City of Temecula. under negotiation - Pdce and Terms of Payment and 2. §54956.9(b)1 Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation - Significant Exposure to Litigation - New Community Lutheran Church Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 94-06 Resolution: No. 94-15 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Ron Roberts presiding Invocation Pastor Tim Buttrey, Temecula Valley Christian Center Flag Salute Councilmember Birdsall ROLL CALL: Birdsell, Mufioz, Parks, Stone, Robarts PRESENTATIONS/ PRESENTATIONS Proclamation - Scholarship Awareness Week Presentation by Small Business Development Center, Corazzini Presentation on "Aging" - Jane Farmer Proclamation - American Cancer Society Daffodil Days Teri Agend~0222e4 I 02/17/14 PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item n~t listed on the Agenda or on the consent Calendar, a pink "Requeat To Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items a "Request To Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR 2 NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Standard Ordinance Adoorion Procedure RECOMMENDATION 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of February 1, 1994; Aoendd022294 2 02/17/14 7 8 9 10 Authorization to Renew Prooertv Insurance Policy RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve the renewal of the City's property insurance coverage with Aetna Insurance Company in an amount not to exceed ~30,000, annual premium. French Valley Airoort Master Plan Uodate RECOMMENDATION: 8,1 Receive and file report. Acceotance of an Offer of Dedication - Portions of Camoanula Way and Acceotance Into the City-Maintained Storm Drain Svstem- Storm Drain Facilities within Portions of Camoanula Way RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE OFFER OF DEDICATION OF, PORTIONS OF CAMPANULA WAY AND ACCEPTING STORM DRAIN FACILITIES WITHIN PORTIONS OF CAMPANULA WAY INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM BookinQ Fees RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Authorize the Mayor to execute the appropriate documents to resolve the booking fees question pursuant to SB 2557. AeendN022294 4 02/1 3 Resolution Aoorovino list of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt · resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 ~ 5 6 "No ParkinQ" Zone on Avenida Barca from Humber Drive to Via Monterey RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING' ZONE ON AVENIDA BARCA FROM HUMBER DRIVE TO RANCHO VIA MONTEREY All-way Stoo. Rancho Vista Road at Meadows Parkway RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ESTABLISHING 'STOP SIGNS" Review and Aooroval of Fiscal Year 1993-94 Mid-Year Budaet RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 OF TEMECULA Adopt · resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE RSCAL YEAR 1993-94 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET ~ -'aende~222~4 a 02,q 7/e4 SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 11 Second Reading of Ordinance 94-05. Adootino Portions of the Old Town Soecific Plan RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING PORTIONS OF THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AND AMENDING CITY ORDINANCES 90-04, 92-16, AND 93-12 PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 12 Amendment to Section No. 18.~8 A.C.(10) of Ordinance No. 348 Pertaining to the Tvoe of Paving Material Reouired for access to Second Dwelling Units RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94,- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION NO. 18.28.A.C.(10) OF ORDINANCE NO. 348 PERTAINING TO THE TYPE OF PAVING MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR ACCESS TO SECOND DWELLING UNITS 'a43endNO22294 S 02/11/14 13 14 Planning Aoolication No. 93-0179. Amendment No. 1. Second Unit Permit - Aooeal of Conditions of ADoroval No. 31 and 42 (reouirement for the all-weather access to the second unit) (Continued from the meeting of 01/11/94) RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REGARDING THE APPEAL BY RAYMOND AND ODETTE DETOBERT AND MICHELLE HAPlOT AND APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0179, AMENDMENT NO. 1 Ordinance Amendino Land use Code reoardino Plot Plans. Conditional Use Permits and Public Use Permits (Continued from the meeting of 01/25/94) RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO.' 94- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND PUBLIC USE PERMITS 14.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND PUBLIC USE PERMITS Agenda/022294 8 02/17/14 15 Establishment of a Vehicle Imoound Cost Recovery Fee 16 (Continued from the meeting of 1/25/94) RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING A VEHICLE IMPOUND COST RECOVERY FEE Amendment to Ordinance 348 to Add a New Section Providing ReQulations to Allow for a Reduction in Sauare Footaoe to ADDrOved Residential Subdivisions RECOMM=_NDATION: 16.1 Direct staff to prepare an Urgency Ordinance amending Ordinance 348 by adding a new section providing regulations to allow for a reduction of square footage and changes to elevations to approved residential subdivisions. COUNCIL BUSIN 17 Consideration of Recommendation Regardino County Ambulance Services RECOMM --'NDATION: 17.1 Support the County of Riverside pursuing ambulance services through the competitive bid process. 18 AeeedefO22214 Soecific P an No. 164. Amendment No. 2 (PA93-0145) Rorioaucih (Continued from 02-08-94) RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Re-introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AD 3PTING LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. I re4, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH GE ~IERAL KEARNY ROAD 02~17/94 18.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164, AMENDMENT NO. 2, (PLANNING APPLICATION 930145), LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD SO AS TO CHANGE "THE ZONING" FOR PLANNING AREA 7 FROM VERY HIGH RESIDENTIAL (20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (12 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), TO ADD A THREE (3) ACRE PARK TO PLANNING AREA 7, TO ADJUST THE BOUNDARIES BETWEEN PLANNING AREAS 7, 8 AND 9, AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 93-07 18.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 27827 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0144) LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD SO AS TO CREATE A 162 SINGLE FAMILY LOT SUBDIVISION PLUS A THREE (3) ACRE LOT FOR A PUBLIC PARK WITHIN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 167, PLANNING AREA NO. 7 AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 94-08 19 2O General Plan Consistency Handbook RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY HANDBOOK Performina Arts/Community Theater RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Consider the City's participation with the Temecula 'Valley Unified School District in the construction and expansion of the Chapparal High School Theater for use as a community performing arts theater. Agendi/022294 I 02/17/94 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: March 8, 1994, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California Agends/0222e4 9 O2/17/14 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SFRVICES nlSTRICT MFFTIN~ - (To be held at 8:00) Next in Order: CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: PUBLIC COMMENT: Resolution: No. 94-01 President Jeff Stone DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberts, Stone Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR I Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of the meeting of February 8, 1994. Review and Aooroval of the Fiscal Year 1993-94 Mid-Year Budoet 2 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGETS Acceptance of Grant Deed for Remainder of Sam Hicks Monument Park RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Accept a grant deed from the Sam Hicks Monument Park Foundation for the remaining parcel within Sam Hicks Monument Park. AgenclN022284 10 02/17ill, 4 Contract Chanae Orders No. 1 ~ through No. 13 -Communitv Recreation Center - Phase II. Project No. PW92-29B RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve Contract Change Orders No. 12 end No. 13 for the Community Recreation Center - Phase II, Project No. PW92-29B, for labor, material, and equipment in the amount of $20,356.68. Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement for · Proiect Coordinator for the Community Recreation Center. Project No. PW92-029B RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve Amendment No. 3, extending the Professional Services Agreement for a Project Coordinator for the Community recreation Center, Project No. PW92-29B, for an additional 36 days in an amount not to exceed $9,760.00; 5.2 Appropriate funds in the amount of $9,760.00 from TCSD bond proceeds to account number 250-190-129-5804. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT - Dixon DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS. ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting March 8, 1992, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California 'e'eende/O22294 I 1 02/17N TEMECULA REDEVELOPM;NT AGENCY MEETINn Next in Order: Resolution: No. 94-02 CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Roberts, Parks Stone, Mufioz, PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. AGENCY BUSINESS 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of February 8, 1994. Review and Aooroval of the Fiscal Year 1993-94 Mid-Year Budaet RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 BUDGETS FOR THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUNDS Aeencle/022294 12 02/17/~4 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting March 8, 1994, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816, Temecula, California AOend~O22294 13 02/17,14 PR S NTATIONS\ PROCLAMATIONS The City of Temecula PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the Temecuh Valley High School Scholarship Foundation is a nonprofit organization chartered in 1987 with the Citizens Scholarship Foundation of America, Inc. for the purpose of providing financial aid to Temecula Valley High School students aspiring to higher education without regard to race, creed, color, sex oi: national origin, and WHEREAS, in 1993 $68,000.00 in scholarships were awarded to deserving seniors as a result of donations from individuals, firms, corporations and organizations from throughout the Temccula/Murrieta area; and WHEREAS, again this year the cost of tuition, books and housing is skyrocketing and the current economic climate remains depressed; and WHEREAS, some high school graduates are finding that the doors to a college education may be closed to them without public awareness of the need and donations to assist these scholars; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Ronald H. Roberts, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim the week of February 20, 1994 to be "Scholarship Awareness Week" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temeeuh to be affixed this 22nd day of February, 1994. Ron Robert,s, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk The City of Temecula PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the daffodil is the first flower of spring and with spring comes the eternal hope of a world free of cancer, and; WHEREAS, the American Cancer Society has chosen the daffodil to symbolize this hope, and; WHEREAS, this year the Temocula Noon Rotary, working in concert with the American Cancer Society will welcome spring during the annual Daffodil Days celebration, a fundraising event designed to reach a goal of $80,000 in the Inland Empire, and; WHEREAS, corporate, business and individual participation is essential to fund the continuing research, education and rehabilitation programs in our community, NOW, THEREFORE, I, Ronald H. Roberrs, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim the month of March to be, "DAFFODIL DAYS MONTH" in the City of Temecula and I call upon businesses and citizens to join in this program by purchasing daffodils from the American Cancer Society to spread the hope and happiness of spring to loved ones, friends, family and business associates or to send to cancer patients at local health care facilities. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 22nd .day of February, 1994. Ron Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk ITEM 1 ITEM NO. 2 MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD FEBRUARY 1, 1994 A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:04 PM at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Tamecula, California. Mayor Ron Robarts presiding. PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Mui~oz, Parks, Stone, Robarts ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and City Clerk June S. Greek. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor Rick Izman, Temecula Valley Community Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilmember Parks. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Mur~oz stated he met with Timothy Vonalt, from Goodhew Ambulance Services, and requested that the matter of contract proposals for county emergency services be placed on a future agenda for recommendations. Mayor Pro Tem Stone also stated he met with the same gentlemen and would like to seek bids from other companies for these services. City Manager Dixon stated this could be placed on the agenda of February 22, 1994. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. Economic Devalooment WorkshoD City Manager Dixon presented a report on Economic Development, using a set of overheads to outline various types of funding sources which a City uses to provide Minutes%2%01 ~94 -1 - 02/08/94 CiW Council Minute FebNew 1.1994 needed services. He also showed percentages to illustrate these services are broken- down. Kenneth Dodd, 30097 Via Velez Race, presented an overview of the City's Promotional Program on a national scale. He explained that this has been an awareness campaign, directed at making the name "Temecula" known throughout the country. He reported that incentives are very important in attracting businesses to the community and read · list of the top 10 incentives. Councilmember Mufioz asked if most incentives are State funded. Mr. Dodd answered they are a combined effort of state, county and cities. Mr. Dodd stated the City must be in a position to have a prepared document as to what it can offer to companies, and explained how important attitudes and perceptions are in attracting new companies to an area. Councilmember Parks stated he feels it is important to work with the State and County in putting together a program to attract business. He reported that the City is also competing with other countries. City Manager Dixon reported the City is in negotiations now, competing with the United Kingdom and Germany, Mr. Dodd stated he feels a more "unified front" is needed from the Council to attract business, and the Council needs to be closely aligned with the Economic Development Council and the Chamber of Commerce. Councilmember Mu~oz stated that the main emphasis of the promotion program was to bring employers to the City, not tax dollars. He objected to the campaign being described as an "awareness" campaign, and felt it is a promotional program. City Manager Dixon said he feels the program the Council asked Mr. Dodd to do was an awareness program, not one seeking sales tax revenues or to generate retailers. He explained that one of the things that can be noted is more than ~1.3 million a year are generated through tax increment within the RDA and a substantial amount is from industrial facilities. Dennis Chiniaeff, 29321 Via Norte, stated that prior to incorporation, the area developers spent corporate millions to bring new jobs to the community, He explained that this was accomplished because necessary infra-structure was built, He said he believes incentives are: one, monetary which should be looked at as an investment decision and which must bring a return to the City; two, the attitude that the City offers to the business world; three, a fast track program to assist companies through the development process. He stated that when people read of dissention and conflict, it does not reflect a business friendly atmosphere. He stated that every City employee should consider themselves an "ambassador" for City Hall. Minutee%2%O 1%94 -2- 02/08/94 City tourrail Minutes Febmaw 1. 1994 Derek Thomas, 31820 Via Levantar, Chief Financial Officer of the EDC agreed with the comments of Mr. Chiniaeff that a unified plan must be adopted. He explained it is difficult for the EDC to know what to expect from the City, He asked the City support the EDC in their efforts to hire a full-time Director. Jeff Minkler, Area Manager for Kemper, 35790 Linda Rosea Road, stated he feels it is important that the City Council adopt a policy on incentives so that no confusion will exist. Mayor Roberts asked how he would feel about the private sentor participating in offering incentives to companies wishing to locate in the City. Mr. Minkler stated the easiest way for the private sector to do this would be to offer lower prices on land. Mayor Pro Tem Stone stated he feels the City Council is perceived incorrectly and not all members are against incentives. He stated he is in favor of developing a matrix outlining various incentives that might be offered depending upon the situation. Councilmember Birdsall stated she feels that City needs to oparete like a corporate structure and incentives should be viewed as an investment in the community. Carliene Anderson, 41593 Winchester Road, Ste 105, distributed packets to the Council, including the mission statement of the EDC. She suggested the City meet with County and State representatives to put together a plan to attract businesses, and keep them from going out of state. She said that a combined effort is needed when competition is a way of life. She stated that incentives are a very important part of this process, and incentives need not always be financial. Councilmember Muftoz stated he agrees with the City participating in a combined effort with the State and County. He says he favors incentives that are not financial. Councilmember Parks asked if, based on working with the City over the last year, a point person is needed. Ms. Anderson stated that Mr. Dixon has been an excellent representative,-but since he will soon be taking another position, a representative to work with the EDC should be appointed. Mayor Pro Tem Stone asked Ma. Anderson how the EDC can insure jobs will not go to Murrieta. Ms. Anderson stated that jobs in the area will benefit both communities, whether they locate in Temecula or Murrieta. Councilmember Parks stated he feels economic development is important for the entire valley and jobs in the area should be the main emphasis, not whether they locate in Temecula or Murrieta. Councilmember Mui~oz asked if the County has been approached to join the EDC. Ms. Anderson stated they are ~5001year members. MinuTest,2~01 't94 -3- 02/08/94 Ciw Council IVinutee Febmew 1. 1994 Mayor Robarts called a recess at 8:48 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 9:05 PM with all members present. Evelyn Harker, 31130-85 So. General Kearny, emphasized the need to increase the number of jobs in this area to increase the quality of life. Joan Sparkman, 30554 San Pasqual Road, stated she feels the City needs to change its attitude toward neighboring cities. She said she feels the City Council needs to become the "Nordstroms" of the area, treating people with respect and giving them the level of service they ned and desire. Vivi Wells, 39460 Oakcliff Drive, stated she agrees with incentives as long as the City gets its money beck. She asked that a specific point person be appointed to work with the EDC. City Manager Dixon said he understands the Council's direction that the City needs to develop an incentive package that is clearly understandable. He reported the City of Lancaster has a model that it uses to determine the benefits derived from various companies. He stated he has run a model that gives guidelines that Temecula may be able to adopt. He emphasized that each understanding must be separate and distinct. He stated with respect to retail assistance from sales tax, that opportunity no longer exists due to passage of the Eisanburg Bill which prevents such assistance. Councilmember Mufioz stated he feels that the last item on a list of incentives to be offered should be cash grants. He stated a structured criteria should be developed and other means such as fast-tracking should be used before considering grants. He said has represented clients who were trying to get programs through the City's system and he has had to personally intercede to make things happen. Councilmember Parks stated he would like to see a commitment for an economic development program for this year be made with a specific staff representative assigned to pursue sources of funding. He also recommended a policy on incentives be developed to identify the City's official position. Mayor Pro Tam Stone suggested that projects be assigned a Council liaison to help move projects forward. He supported the need for a matrix listing incentives, based on return for the community. He stated he feels a scaled-clown program should be instituted this year with the Assistant City Manager as the point person. He said he feels a special meeting is need to design the matrix, which needs to receive "buy-in" by each member of the Council. Mayor Roberts stated .he feels the EDC needs a paid, experienced General Manager and staff. He said he still has problems with Temecula paying $10,000.00 as opposed to Murrieta's $1,000.00. He said he feels a marketing program is still needed for the IVinutee~2~01%94 -4- 02/08/94 City Courtoil Minute FebNew 1, 1994 City, but on a smaller scale. He listed those things that have been brought out such as incentives are acceptable with grants as a last resort and political stability and an undivided City Council is needed to change the perception of the City as being anti- business. Councilmember Parks reported that the EDC has been instrumental in putting together a workshop with Rancho California Water District, and have set up a long term program with Eastern Municipal Water District. Mayor Pro Tam Stone asked that Southern California be the focus of future marketing instead of National. City Manager Dixon stated he feels direction has been given to staff to prepare s synopsis of the points agreed upon during the discussions and to place a policy/matrix on a future agenda for consideration and/or action by the Council. Council consensus was given. Councilmember Mu~oz asked that subsequent meetings be recorded. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tam Stone to extend the meeting until 10:30 PM. The motion carried 4-1 with Councilmember Birdsall in opposition. Position of City Maneoar City Manager Dixon reported that the position of City Manager will be vacated at the end of February and Council direction needs to be received on how to proceed. He listed various alternatives as follows: one, fill the position from within and appoint the Assistant City Manager as interim City Manager; two, fill the position with an interim City Manager and three, to secure the services of an executive recruitment firm to professionally conduct a recruitment for the position. He explained that an interim City Manager could come from a list of retired City Managers and that the Council should define if the Interim City Manager would conduct the recruitment for a City Manager or whether a consultant should be hired to do this recruitment. Mr. Dixon reported that recruitment for a permanent City Manager should take between 90 to 120 days. Mr. Dixon stated if Council desires to retain an interim City Manager, he would work with the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem to put together a list of 8 or 10 applicants for the full Council to interview. He said such an appointment could be for a time certain or until a permanent City Manager is hired. Minutee~2~01 ~94 -5- 02/08/94 City Coundl Minutes Februm 1, 1994 Vivi Wells, 39460 Oakcliff Drive, stated she feels the position of City Manager should be more described than it has been in the past She read a list of suggested qualifications and presented it to the City Clerk for the record. Councilmember Parks stated he is in favor of hiring an interim City Manager because he feels the Assistant City Manager is too busy with current activities. He emphasized that he would like to hire a City Manager of equal or better calibre than the current City Manager and would like to use the services of a professional recruitment team. Councilmember Muf~oz said he is in favor of the Assistant City Manager serving as Interim City Manager, since he is familiar with the community and would provide continuity. He said that he feels the City Council should be directly involved in the hiring of the new City Manager and a consultant should not be used. He stated he would like to examine the compensation level, and establish guidelines in advance. Councilmember Birdsall stated she is in favor of hiring an Interim City Manager, and suggested that the Interim City Manager be used to recruit the permanent City Manager. She stated that a time limit should be placed on this of three months, and if after that time, no decision has been made, a consultant should be brought in. Mayor Pro Tam Stone stated he is also in favor of hiring an Interim City Manager who is not be a candidate. He said he feels this is an important position and should be given to someone with extensive experience. He stated he feels the City Council should be directly involved in the selection of the City Manager. Mayor Robarts stated that he is in favor of hiring an Interim City Manager. City Manager Dixon said a group of retired City Managers who provide this service are available through the League of California Cities. He stated he could contact them tomorrow and ask for a list of 8 or 10 candidates and the Council could collectively choose candidates they would like to interview. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsell, seconded by Mayor Pro Tam Stone to instruct the City Manager to initiate the process to select an interim City Manager from a group of non-applicant candidates, and to present these to the Council for consideration within the next 30 days. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Roberts NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mufioz ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Minute8%2~01%94 -~ 02/08/94 Ciw Coun;il Minute Febmew 1, 1994 It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to direct that criteria, provided by the City Council, be developed for selecting a City Manager. This criteria is to be used by the interim City Manager to conduct a recruitment/selection process which involves the members of the City Council. Further, it was directed that the process be reviewed in 90 days to determine if it is effective. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Mufioz, Stone, Roberts NOES: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Councilmember Parks stated he feels · professional recruiter is needed to effectively recruit for a I~osition such as City Manager and feels that three months will be wasted by not proceeding with a consultant immediately. City Manager Dixon stressed how important confidentiality is to the process. CITY MANAGI:R REPORTS None given. CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Mufioz, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to adjourn at 10:40 PM to a meeting on February 8, 1994, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. ATTEST: J. Sal Mufioz, Mayor "" June S. Greek, City Clerk Minutes~2\01 t94 -7- 02/08/94 ITEM NO. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TlgvlECULA ~-LLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DElVlANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER .AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been audited by the City Managcr, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $1,2~7,484.38. Section ~. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED~ this 22nd day of February, 1994. ATTEST: Ron Robcrts, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [S AL] STATE OF CAI-n~ORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) CITY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of ~e City of Temecula, hereby do certify ~ ~he foregoing Resolution No. 94- was duly adopt~ sl a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 22nd day of February, 1994 by ~he fonowins ron can vo~e: AYES: 0 COUNCH34P-MBERS: None NOES: 0 COUNCIL_-MI~!MBE~: None COUNt: None June S. Greek, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 02/03/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 02/10/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 02/22/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 02/10/94 TOTAL PAYROU~ 81~3,132.06 185,041.13 l!e2,947,32 S10e,363.87 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 02/22/94 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 191 192' 210 2~ 310 330 380 GENERAL GA8 TAX DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND TCSD TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) TCSD-CIP RDA-CIP SELF-INSURANCE VEHICLES INFORMATIONS SYSTEM8 COPY CENTER FACILITIES RDA-DEBT SERVICE 18,gl 1.80 17,278.36 ~,587.58 PAYROLL: 001 190 191 193 300 320 330 340 GENERAL (PAYROLL) GAS TAX (PAYROLL) TCSD (PAYROLL) TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A (PAYROLL) TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C (PAYROLL} SELF-INSURANCE (PAYROLL) INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PAYROLL) COPY CENTER (PAYROLL) FACIUTIES ~88,428.72 S16,636.24 $15,933.85 8433.18 $1,717.65 8548.t0 t1,162.50 TOTAL BY FUND: PREPARED BY KARMA INTYRE - I, MARY J'I,~IE ;' FINANCE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. : DIXON, CITY MANAGEF , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING 18 TRUE AND CORRECT. $1,151,1 20,51 $106,363.87 $1,25'/,484.65 VOUCHRE2 02/0:3/9/, 17:07 CiTY OF TEHECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUll) 100 GAS TAX FUND 120 DEVELOPHENT IllPACT FUND 190 COIIqUN]TY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 280 REDEVELOIq, ENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 310 VEHICLES FIJND 320 IMFORNATIUN SYSTENS )30 COPY CENTER FUND FACILITIES TOTAL /T 77,867.63 15,861.57 9,300.00 15,035.48 5,786.11 3,8~0.12 219.30 560.35 1,204.13 2,551.26 3,343.~0 37,562./,1 173,132.06 voucr o2/o~. 17:o7 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VEIIDOR H~ER DATE ~ER 13541 02/03/9A 000101 135~1 02/03/94 000101 13542 02/03/94 000102 13543 02103194 000105 13543 02/03/94 000105 135~, 02/03/94 000116 135U, 02/03/94 000116 135/,/, 02/03/94 000116 135z~c. 02/03/94 000116 135~4 02/03/94 000116 13546 02/03/94 000116 135~4 02/03/94 000116 135z~ 02/03/96 000116 135~ 02/03/94 000116 13545 02/03/96 000120 13545 02/03/94 000120 137 32/03/94 000120 13546 02/03/94 00012~ 13547 02/03/94 000131 13547 02/03/96 000131 13568 02/03/94 000160 13548 02/03/94 000160 13568 02/03/94 000160 13548 02/03/96 000160 13548 02/03/94 000160 13548 02/03/94 000160 13548 02/03/94 000160 13549 02/03/94 0OO146 APPLE ORE APPLE ORE AMERICAN FENCE CO, OF C AEI SECURITY, INC. AEI SECURITY, INC. AVP VISIOR PLANS AVP VISIOR PLANS AVP VISIOR PLANS AVP VISIOR PLANS AVP VISION PLANS AVP VISION PLANS AVP VISION PLANS AVP VISION PLANS AVP VISION PLANS BICKNELL TRAVEL CENTER BICKNELL TRAVEL CENTER BICKNELL TRAVEL CENTER CAL VEST RENTAL CENTER CARL WARREN & CO., INC. CARL WARREN & CO., INC. COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COUNTS UNLINI'TED 13550 02/03/94 000155 DAVLIN 13550 02/03/94 000155 DAVLIN 13551 02/03/94 000156 13551 02/03/94 000156 13551 02/03/94 000156 13552 02/03/94 000165 13552 02/03/94 000165 13553 02/03/94 000177 000177 135:, J2/0~/94 000177 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA DENT[CARE OF CALIFORNIA DEMTICARE OF CALIFORNIA FEDERAL EXPRESS FEDERAL EXPRESS GLENNIES OFFICE PRODtJCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT CITY OF TBECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEIq DESCRIPTION TEI4P HERVICE/ME 1/15/9~ TEMP SERVICE/ME 1/22/9~ TEMPORARY FENCE RENTAL ALARM MOIdlTORING; CITY ALARM MONITCRING SERVIC INSIJRANCE PREMIUM/FEB. INStJRANCE PREMIUM/FEB. INSURANCE PREMIUM/FEB. INSIJRANCE PREMIUM/FEB. INSURANCE PREI41UM/FEB. INSIJItANCE PREleIUM/FEB. IN$IJRANCE PREMIUM/FEB, ]NStJRANCE PREMIUM/FEB, INSURANCE PREMIUM/FEB, COMFERENCE/S.FORDeJ.HEY CORFERENCE/S.FORI),J.NEY WORKSHOP/C. RUIZ TRENCHER RENTAL LAKE VILLAGE COI~ITY NAJE~SKI, CRAIG INSURANCE PREMIUM FEB 9 INSUILANCE PREMIUM FEB 9 INSURANCE PREMIUM FEB 9 INSURANCE PREMIUM FEB 9 INSURANCE PREMIUM FEB 9 INSURANCE PREMIUM FEB 9 INSURANCE PREMIUM FEB 9 TWO DIRECTIONAL LINK CO VIDEO/AUDIO TAPE AUDIO TAPING/PUBLIC SAF INSURANCE PREHIUM/FEBRU INSURANCE PREMIUM/FEBRU INSURANCE PRENIUM/FEBRU PRIORITY TUBE STANDARD PAKTOBI$ OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SU MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES ACCOUNT NUNBER 280-199-999-5250 280-199-999-5250 190-180-999-5238 340-1~-~-5250 190-180-999-5250 001 -Z$10 I00-2310 190-2310 191-2310 19~-2310 ~00-Z$10 530-2~10 34,0-2310 001-1180 001-161-999-5272 001-161-999-5258 001-161-999-5261 190-180-~-5238 300-199-99~-5205 300-1~-~;~-5205 001-2330 100-2:~0 190-2530 191-2330 193-2330 530-2,'130 :~0-2.330 100-1(~-9f9-5406 001-100-999-5250 001-1(~-~-5250 001-23~0 100-2,~0 001-150-999-5250 001-161-f~-5230 001-160-~-5230 001-120-~-5220 1~0-180-~-527.0 001-110-~-5220 001-160-~-5220 ITEM ANOUNT 103.20 116.10 145.00 105.00 105.00 437.14 136.52 97.15 4,14 5.06 3.9~ 15.75 15.75 26.95 138.00 103.00 1~4.00 101.82 265.00 129.25 130.75 9.75 132 .CO 11 .~8 16.02 19.50 25.50 800.~ 701.67 153.3~ 29.86 14.93 15.00 20.2:$ 9.00 (:8.15 166.67 15.77 PAGE 1 CHE;K AMOUNT 219.30 145.00 210.00 740.~0 385.00 101.82 394.25 363.00 800.00 855.01 59.79 29.23 VOUCHRE2 CiTY OF TENECULA 02/03/9~ 17:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER Flit ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEH ACCOUNT NLIiER DATE NtJlIBER MANE DESCRiPTiON NUNBER iTEN MI3UIIT CHE, CK N4OUNT 13553 02/03/94 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PROIRJCT HIS(. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5220 26.11 276.19 13556 02/03/96 000184 GTE CALIFORNIA ]NCORPOR 909-699-0128 320-199-999-5208 269.58 269.58 13555 02/03/96 000186 HANKS HARDVARE MISt. SHALL TOOLS & SUP 3443-199-999-5242 308.36 13556 02/03/96 000201 JENNAOD PROVIDE CUSTODZAL NAZNT 190-182-999-5212 400.00 400. O0 13557 02/03/96 000209 L & H FERTiLiZER, INC. HISC. PANTS 190-180-999-5242 22,25 22.25 13558 02/03/9~ 000210 LEAGUE OF CALIF.CITIES ANNUAL LEAGUE DUES 001-100-999-5226 5,013.00 5,013.00 13559 02/03/94 000228 14081L 883 930 379 2 DE(BIER 001-162-999-5263 13559 02/03/9~ 000228 NO61L 883 930 379 2 DE(BIER 001-161-999-5262 13559 02/03/9~ 000228 HOBIL 883 930 379 2 DECE!IER 190-180-999-5263 42.5,G 16.06 16.16 72.76 13560 02/03/9~ 000265 13560 02/03/96 000265 13560 02/03/9~ 000265 13560 02/03/96 000245 13560 02/03/96 000245 13560 02/03/94 000245 13560 02/03/94 000245 13560 02/03/94 000265 13560 02/03/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREH PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR,PREH PERS (HEALTH INSUR,PREI4 PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR,PREIq PERS (HEALTH INSUR,PREN PERS (HEALTH INSUR,PREN PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR.PREN 13561 02/03/96 000247 PESTIqASTER INSURANCE PREN]UN/FEBRU 001-2090 INSURANCE PREN]UH/FEBRU 100-2090 INSIJRANCE PREHIUN/FEBRU 190-2090 [NStJRANCE PREHIUI4/FEBRLI 191-2090 iNSURANCE PREHIIJN/FEBRU 193-2090 INSURANCE PREMIUIq/FEBRU 300-2090 INSURANCE PREHILN/FEBRU 330-2090 INSURANCE PRENIUH/FEBRU 340-20~0 INSURANCE PREMIUH/FEBRU 001-150-99~-5250 RIGHT-OF-iZAY NEED CONTR 100-166-999-5602 13,979.09 3,836.81 3,981.84 135.95 669.7~ 163.88 302.11 622.93 112,64 9,817.49 23,384.99 9,817.69 13562 02/03/94 00024~ PETROLANE 13562 02/03/94 0002/,8 PETROLANE 13562 02/03/96 00024,8 PETROLANE FUEL 190-180-999-5263 FUEL 001-162-999-5263 FUEL/TCSO 1g0-180-999-5263 47.95 252.89 88.13 388.97 13563 02/03/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINBIJAN 001-100-999-5258 13563 02/03/9~ 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINS/JAN 001-150-999-5262 13563 02/03/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINS/JAM 001-150-999-5250 13563 02/03/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINB/JAN 001-150-999-5265 13563 02/03/96 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINB/JAN 001-161-999-5260 13563 02/03/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINB/JAN 001-163-999-5260 13563 02/03/96 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/TCSO 190-180-999-5222 13563 02/03/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/TCSO 190-180-999-5260 13563 02/03/96 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/TCSO 190-181-999-5301 13563 02/03/9~ 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASN/TCSO 190-183-999-5320 13563 02/03/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASN/TCSD 190-183-999-5340 13563 02/03/94 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/TCSO 190-183-999-5370 7.96 1.75 17.63 16.00 61.08 43.19 19.40 49.06 59.03 18.98 27.31 22.04 3~3.63 13564 02/03/94 000253 POSTNASTER 13564 02/03/94 000253 PORTNASTER EXPRESS HAIL DEC/JAN EXPRESS HAIL DEC/JAN 190-180-999-5230 001-161-999-5230 9.95 13 13565 02/03/94 00025/, PRESS-ENTERPRISE COleAN SUBSCRIPTION 190-180-999-5226 13566 02/03/94 000262 RAN(NO UATER 11/22-12/20 193-180-999-52/d) 23.92 2,015.43 VOUC' CITY OF TENECULA 02/0. 17:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VEND(XI VENDOR ITL=M ACCOUNT NtAqBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCltIPTIC)N NLliBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 13566 02/03/9/, 0Q0262 RANCHO kIATER 11/22-12/20 19Q-180-999-5260 13566 02/03/~ QQQZ62 RANCHO UATER 11/15-1Z/14 193-180-999-5260 13566 02/03/9/, 0Q0262 RANCHO UATER 11/15-12/14 193-180-999-5260 13566 02/03/94 000262 RANCHOL~ATER 11/15-12/14 193-180-999-5240 13566 02/03/9~ 000262 RANCHO k~ATER 11/15-12/14 193-180-999-5240 13566 02/03/~ 000262 RANCliO k/ATER 11/15-12/14 193-180-999-5240 13566 02/03/9~ 000262 RANCHO ~ATER 11/15-12/14 193-180-999-52~0 13566 02/03/94 000262 RANClIO tIATER 11112-12/14 193-180-999-5260 13566 02/03/94 000262 RANCHOIdATER 11/15-12/14 193-180-999-5240 13566 02/03/94 000262 RANCHO IdATER 11118-12116 193-180-999-5240 135&& 02/03/94 000262 RANCHO gATER 11/18-12/16 193-180-999-5240 13566 02/03/9~ 000262 RANCHO bUtTER 11/18-12/16 193-180-999-5260 13566 02/03/9~ 000262 RANCHO tdATER 11/18-12/16 190-180-999-5240 13566 02/03/9~ 000262 RANCHO IdATER 11/18-12/16 190-180-999-5260 13566 02/03/94 000262 RANCHO I~ATER 11122-12/20 193-180-999-5240 13566 02/03/94 000262 RANCHO UATER 11/29-12/30 190-180-999-5240 193.27 55.21 42.79 59.70 48.89' 66.44 56.41 161.85 27.96 108.24 53.72 66.59 28.99 27.~0 53.92 3,141.24 13567 02/03/94 000285 SIR SPEEDY 1000 BUSINESS LICENSE 001-160-9~-5222 13567 02/03/94 000285 SIR SPEEDY TAX 001-140-~-5222 13~/"02/03/94 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T REPAIRS 310-164-999-5214 13~ 02/03/96 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T REPAZRS/PU 310-16~-999-5214 156.63 12.14 20.99 77.87 168.77 13569 02/03/94 000303 TANGET STORE RECREATION SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5301 192.32 192.32 13570 02/03/94 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY OD. 1357O 02/03/94 000307 TENEOULA TROPHY CO. 2 SETS OF POOL TROPHIES 190-182-999-5301 TROPHIES 190-182-999-5301 25.86 25.86 51.72 13571 02/03/94 000319 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. 4 UHEEL BARKER 190-180-999-5301 13571 02/03/94 000319 TONARK SPORTS, INC, FREIGHT 190-180-999-5301 13571 02/03/94 000319 TONARK SPORTS, INC. TAX 190-180-999-5301 200.00 13.15 15.50 228.65 13572 02/03/94 000320 TCNNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-163-999-5220 13573 02/03/94 000322 UNIGLONE BUTTERFIELD TR RON RORERTS S.F. AIRFAR 13573 02/03/94 000322 UNZGLONE BUTTERFIELD TR CONF/RP & RR 13573 02/03/94 000322 UNZGLONE BUTTERFIELD TR CONF/RP & RR 001 - 100-999-5258 001 - 100-999-5258 001-100-999-5258 138.00 1/,4.00 1~.00 426.00 13574 02/03/94 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 2 SETS OF ONIFORMS CLRA 100-164-999-5243 13574 02/03/94 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE ONIFOR!q RENTAL 190-180-999-5243 13574 02/03/94 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNIFRON RENTAL 190-180-999-5243 13574 02/03/94 QOQ326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE IJNIFORM RENTAL 190-180-999-524k3 13574 02/03/94 000326 ONZTOG RENTAL SERVICE RENTAL/UNIFORm 360-199-999-5250 13574 02/03/94 000326 UNZTOG RENTAL SERVICE BATS/RUG RENTAL 340-199-999-5250 16.10 16.10 16.10 3~.50 3~.50 140.30 13573 02/03/94 000342 ~INDSOR PARTNERS - RANC 13576 02/03/94 0003/,5 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 13~ ~2/03/W, 000348 ZIGLER, GAlL 135~ J2/03/9~ 0003/~ ZIGLER, GAIL RENT FEBRUARY LEASE AGREEMENT; 5100 c REFRESIH4EMTS/COUNCIL 2/ PARK DEDICATIOR/REFRESH 340-199-999-523~ 330-1~9-~(~-5239 001-100-~-5~0 1~0-180-~)~-5381 29,665.15 2,9~.95 252.50 29,665.15 2,969.95 312.50 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECIJLA 02/03/9/, 17:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOIl VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE INNBER NNqE DESCRIPTION NUllER ITEN NIOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 13582 02/03/9/* 0(X337/* SOUTHERN PALIF NDZSOM 12/23-01/26 540-199-999-52/*0 13582 O2/O3/9/, Q0037/* SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 12/02-12/30/94 191-18Q-999-5319 13582 02/03/9/, 00037/* SOUTHERN PALIF EDIt)el 12/02-01/0& 191-180-999-5319 13582 02/03/9~ 00037/* SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 9/09-12102 191-180-999-5319 13582 O2/03/94 O0O37/* SOUTHERN PALIF EDISm 12/Z0-01/Z2 190-181-999-52/*0 13582 O2/03/94 00037/, SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 12/23-01/26 191-180-999-52/*0 13582 02/03/94 00037/* SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 12/23-01/26 191-180-999-5319 13582 O2/03/94 OO03?/* SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 12/23-01/26 193-180-999-52/*0 13583 02/03/94 0003?5 SOUTHERN PALZFONNIA TEL PC550 MOTOROLA DIGZTAL 001-120-999-5208 13583 02/03/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL MOTOROLA CIG LZGHT ADAP 001-120-999-5208 13583 02/03/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL AC CHARGER CONDITIONFIt 001-120-~-5208 13583 02/03/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL SLIH EXTENDED LIFE SATT 001-120-999-5208 13583 02/03/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL SLIM EXTENDED LIFE BATT 320-199-999-5208 13583 02/03/94 000375 SOUTHERN PAL]FONNIA TEL TAX 001-120-999-5208 13583 02/03/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL TAX 320-199-999-5208 13503 02/03/94 000375 SOUTHERN PAL]FORNIA TEL NC]6ILE REMOVAL 001-110-999-5208 13583 02/03/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL 909-202-/.761 SN DEC 001-100-999-5208 6,64~.01 201.83 762.20 3,718.15 503.66 ?.5.00 55.00 67.00 67.00 2/* .88 5.19 50.00 193.53 13,097.83 661.60 13584 02/03/94 000~00 ALEXANDER HAMILTON INST RENEI4 NANAGER'$ LEGAL 001-150-999-5228 13585 02/03/94 000~02 BERG, HARK REINiS. iiORK BOOTS OU1-162-999-52/*2 13586 02/03/94 000/,08 AGRICREDZT ACCEPTANCE C 67000/,180910QQ62/TRACTO 190-180-999-5239 /*5.60 100.00 846.02 8/,6.02 13587 02/03/94 000~0g VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY SAFETY SHOVEL 6981 100-164-999-5218 13587 02/03/94 009409 VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY FREIGHT 100-164-999-5218 13587 02/03/94 00040~ VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY TAX 100-164-~-5218 83.70 4.94 95.12 13588 02/03/94 009414 LONGS DRUG STORE FILe PURCHASING 190-180-990-5250 49.32 49.32 13589 02/03/94 000~23 H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU RECREATIONAL PROGRAM 190-180-999-5301 13.33 13.33 13590 02/03/94 000/(.26 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL JANITORIAL SUPPLIES; CI 540-199-999-5212 13590 02/03/94 000/,26 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL SUPPLIES 190-181-999-5212 13590 02/03/94 000/,26 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL SUPPLIES 190-181-999-5212 260.51 87.29 35.58 13591 02/03/94 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA INS PREMIUM FEB 9/* 001-2510 13591 02/03/94 O00430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUMTA INS PRIMION FEB 94 100-2510 13591 02/03/94 00(030 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA INS PREMIUM FEB 94 100-2510 13592 02/03/94 000431 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, INSURANCE PREelUMIFEBRU 001-2340 13592 02/03/94 000431 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, INSUR~CE PREMIUM/FEBRU 100-2~0 13592 02/03/94 OOIX31 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, INSUltAlICE PRENIUM/FEBRU 190-23~0 13592 02/03/94 000431 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, INSURANCE PRENIUM/FEBRU 191-23/,0 13592 02/03/94 000~31 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, INSURANCE PREMIUM/FEBRU 193-2340 13592 02/03/94 000431 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, INSURANCE PRENIUM/FEBRU 300-23~0 13592 02/03/94 000431 RATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, INSURANCE PREM]UM/FEBRU :330-23~0 13592 02/03/94 000431 RATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, INSURANCE PREM]IN/FEBRU 3/*0-23~0 13592 02/03/94 000~31 NATIONAL DENTAL NEALTN, INSURANCE PRENIIJN/FEIPJJ 001-1180 13592 02103/94 000/,31 RATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, INSURANCE PREMIUN/FEBRU 001-150-f99-5250 621.58 170.61 7.31 8.94 4.06 16.25 16.25 4,8.75 VOUC'/''' CITY OF TENECULA 02/0, 17:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOIl ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDDI~ VENI)OR ]TEll ACCOtJtlT NLliBER DATE ~R ~ DESCItIPTION NNR [TEN ANOUNT CHECK AI, IDtRIT 13593 02/03/96 000672 PARADISE CHEVROLET CiTY HANAGER ~HICLE FIR 310-110-999-5216 94,1.85 941.85 13596 02/03/96 000693 TARGET STORE BILLING SONY VIDEO BATTERY PACK 100-16~-999-5218 13594 02/03/96 000693 TARGET STORE BILLING VIDEO CASSETTE TAPES 100-166-999-5218 13596 02/03/96 000693 TARGET STORE BILLING POt. ARIOD FILM (DOUBLE P 100-166-999-5218 13596 02/03/96 000693 TARGET STORE BILLING PRICE DIFFERENCE 100-166-999-5218 13596 02/03/96 00G693 TARGET STORE BILLING TAX 100-16~-999-5218 26.99 59.93 159.90 10.78- 18.98 253.0~ 13595 02/03/96 0Q0537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED! 11/30-12/31 13595 02/03/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED] 11/30-12/31 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 350.3~ 13596 02/03/96 000560 G. NElL CORPANIES DGG-O~6; BRAVO CAItDS 001-140-999-5220 13596 02/03/96 000560 G. HEIL CC)I!PAN]ES DGG-0637; TIME CARDS 001-160-999-5220 13596 02/03/96 000560 G. NElL CCHPANIES DGG-0816; SUGGESTION CA 001-160-999-5220 13596 02/03/96 000560 G. NElL CCIIPANIES DGG-0806; TEM CARDS 001-160-999-5220 13596 02/03/94 000560 G. NEIL CCIlPANIES FREIGHT 001-160-999-5220 13596 02/03/96 000560 G. NElL COHPANIES TAX 001-160-999-5220 6.90 6.90 6.90 6.90 6.57 .01 3A.18 13597 02/03/96 000565 PAC TEL CELLULAR - S.D. SD 1075255011596 001-140-999-5208 13597 02/03/96 000545 PAC TEL CELLULAR - S.D. SD-1075255/MJH 001-160-999-5208 135 32103194 000558 ADVANCED HOBILECOII4 HOBZLE SERVICE 320-109-999-5209 13598 02/03/96 000558 ADVANCED 11)BILECON NOIITHLY SERVICE 320-199-999-5209 94.18 116.6~ 210.82 758.00 135~ 02/03/96 000576 HESA HONES CHANGE OF PERMITS 001-2660 13599 02/03/96 000576 MESA HONES CREDITS/LIBRARY FEES 120-109-6237 13600 02/03/96 000587 NUNOZ, HARIO N. OLD TOMI SR CENTER/l/16 1~0-181-~-5250 13600 02/03/96 000587 HUNOZ, MARIO N. OLD TOUN SR CTR 1/28/94 190-181-~-5250 87.96 9,300.00 200.00 200. O0 9,387.94 600.00 13601 02/03/96 000602 DEAN'S PHOTO FILM AND FILM PROCESSIN 001-162-~-5250 19.6~ 19.6~ 13602 02/03/94 000603 13603 02/03/96 000638 13603 02/03/96 000638 13603 '02/03/94 000638 13606 02/03/96 00064.3 13606 02/03/94 000643 CABLE & WIRELESS COlliNd CALIFONNIA DEPARTHENT 0 CALIFORNIA DEPARTHENT 0 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT 0 FONTHER HARDWARE FORTHER HARDVARE DEC 16-JAR 16 XCA811636 320-199-999-5208 SH] FEES 001-2280 SH] FEES 001-22~0 SH] FEES 001-162-4229 MISt. SUPPLIES AND EQUI 1~0-180-~-5212 HARDWARE SUPPLIES 1~0-180-999-5212 1,659.21 776.56 2,038.09 140.7'J- 172.60 1,659.21 2,675.92 13605 02/03/96 000678 RIVERSIDE COUNTY HEALTH PERIlIT TO OPERATE POOL 190-183-999-5310 200.00 200.00 13606 02/03/94 000686 13606 02/03/94 000686 17,606 02/03/94 000686 17,606 02/03/94 000686 13606 02/03/94 000686 13606 02/03/96 000686 VISIBLE COMPUTER SUPPLY VISIBLE COMPUTER SIJPPLY VISIBLE CCltPUTER SUPPLY VISIBLE CCIIPUTER SUPPLY VISIBLE COMPUTER SUPPLY VISIBLE CCRPUTER SUPPLY 200; RQ-211611; 1993 W'2 001-160-999-5220 200; RQ-7910E; HATCHING 001-160-999-5220 200; RQ-9919C; 1993 109 001-160-999-5220 200; RQ-7951862; DOUBLE 001-160-999-5220 FREIGHT 001-140-999-5220 TAX 001-160-~-5220 51.60 19.15 30.15 15.78 10.50 9.03 136.01 136~ ,2/03/96 000765 GROUP AHERICA PREMZIJM FOR FEBRUARY 001-2360 570.00 VOUCHRE2 CiTY OF TENECULA 02/03/94 17:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ]TEN ACCOUNT NUI4BER DATE NUI4BER leAHE DESCRIPTION NII4BER ITER AROUNT CHECK ANOUNT 13607 02103196 000765 GROUP NERICA PRERItll FOR FEIRUAIIY 100-2360 13607 02103/96 000765 GROUP ARERICA PREMIUM FOR FEBRUARY 190-2360 13607 02/03/96 000765 GROUP N, IERICA PRERIUN FOR FEBRUARY 191-2360 13607 02/03194 000765 GROUP ABlERIrA PItENIUN FOR FEBRUARY 193-Z360 13607 02/03/96 000765 GROUP ANER!rA liEIliUM FOR FEBRUARY 300-2360 13607 02103196 000765 GROUP ABlERIrA PRERILI! FOR FEBRUARY 320-2360 136O7 02/03/9~ OO0765 GROUP ANERIrA liENZUM FOR FEBRUARY 330-2360 13607 O2/03/94 0OO?65 GROUP AMERICA P~EMIUM FOR FEBRUARY 3~0-2360 13607 O2/O3/96 OO0765 GROUP ANERZrA PRENIUM FOR FEBRUARY OOl-2380 13607 O2/03/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMiUM FOR FEBRUARY lOO-2380 13607 O2/03/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIU!~ FOR FEBRUARY 190-2380 136O7 O2/03/94 OO0?65 GROUP ~XERIrA liEmUM FOR FEBRUARY 191-2380 13607 02/03/94 000765 GROUP AHERIrA PRERIUM FOR FEBRUARY 193-2380 13607 O2/O3/94 OOO?65 GROUP ARERIrA liENIUM FOR FEBRUARY 3O0-238O 13607 O2/O3/94 000?65 GROUP ANERIrA liEIliUM FOR FEBRUARY 320-2380 13607 02/03/94 OO0765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR FEBRUARY 33O-238O 13607 O2/O3/94 OO0765 GROUP AHERIrA PREMIUM FOR FEBRUARY 3A0-2380 13607 02/03/94 OOQ?65 GROUP ARERIrA PREMIUM FC~ FEBRUARY 001-25OO 13607 02/03/96 OO0765 GROUP AJ~ERZCA PRERZUM FOR FEBRUARY lOO-25OO 13607 02/03/96 000?65 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR FEBRUARY 190-2500 13607 02/O3/96 OO0?65 GROUP ANERZrA PREMiUM FOR FEBRUARY 191-2500 13607 02/03/96 000?65 GROUP AMERICA liEIliUM FOR FEBRUARY 193-2500 13607 O2/03/96 000?65 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR FEBRUARY 3OO-25OO 13607 02/03/96 000765 GROUP A~ERICA PREMIUM FOR FEBRUARY 320-2500 13607 02/03/96 000765 GROUP AHERZCA PREMiUM FOR FEBRUARY 330-25OO 13607 O2/03/96 OOO?65 GROUP AMERICA PREMiUM FOR FEBRUARY 3~0-2300 13608 02/03/96 000770 UCR EXTENSION CEQA ISSUES TRAINING 001-161-~-5261 128.25 133,00 6.28 16.72 6.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 932.78 226.77 196.67 5.89 20.91 7,76 18.67 8.7~ 9.87 202.01 49.45 42.82 1.30 1.71 6.11 1.92 2.17 175 .OO 2,619.63 175.00 13609 02/03/96 O007gg CAL]FGRNIA HOHZCIDE ZNV REGISTRATIOR/2 ]NVESTIG 001-170-~-5261 150.00 150.00 1:$610 02/03/94 000820 W!NCHAK, KRIS MORKERS CONP FOR JAR 94 001-1182 1:$610 02/03/94 000820 WlNCHAK, KRIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND P lOO-180-~-5226 138.22- 650.00 311.78 13611 02/03/94 000863 IPHA NB4BERSHZP/GRANT YATES OO1-150-~-5226 210.00 210.00 13612 02/03/94 000878 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB DRAW 13 001-1500 13612 02/03/94 000878 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB DRAW 15 OO1-1500 13612 02/03/94 000878 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB DEBIT NENOAINDERBILLED 001-1500 13612 02/03/96 000878 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB DRAW 16 OO1-1500 13612 02/03/96 OO0878 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB DRAW 16 O01-1500 13612 02/03/96 00O878 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB DRAW 12 OO1-15OO 13613 02/03/96 000885 ACCIDENT RECONSTRUCTION SUBSCRIPTION RENEMAL 001-170-999-5261 16,600.25 8,572.82 .50 20,627.27 349.30' 1,726.02 f&.O0 ~6,975.56 96.00 13614 02/03/94 000~10 KOLL NANAGEMENT SERVICE FEB. RENT/TEEN CTR lOO-182-;-523~ 13615 02/03/94 0009~7 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C NISC. BLUEPRINT REliODU OO1-163-~-5260 13616 02/03/94 000969 GICN RENTALS PORTABLE NELDER lOO-166-999-5238 3,376.95 623.15 56.61 3,3?6.95 623.15 1 / voucF"" o2/o~. 17=07 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUNliER DATE NLMeBER NAME 13617 02/03/9/, 000950 CALIFORNIAN - DISPLAY 13617 02/03/94 000950 CAL/FORN]AN - DISPLAY 13618 02/03/94 00C)~74 RUIZ, CPjkIG 13619 02/03/9A OO098O COAST IRRZGATIOH SUPPLY 13619 02/03/94 00O980 COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY 13620 02/03/9A OO0992 P, ANONA TIRE 13621 02/03/9~ 000993 FREEDOM COFFEE, INC. 13621 02/03/9~ 000993 FREEDOM COFFEE, INC. 13621 02/03/9~ 000993 FREEDOM COFFEE, INC. 13622 02/03/9A 001047 BOAT TECH MARINE & SKI 13623 02/03/9~ 00105A CAI. ZFORHZA BUILDING OFF 1362~ 02/03/94 001076 ~ESTERN IJASTE 1362~ 02/03/9~ 001076 ~ESTERH ~ASTE 13& 2/03/04 001103 FREEDOIl MATERIALS 13625 02/03/94 001103 FREEDOM MATERZALS 13626 02/03/9A OO1122 SCOTCH PAINT CORPORATIO 13627 0210319~ 001209 VAULT, THE 13628 02/03/94 0012/,8 PAPER DIRECT 13629 02/03/94 001280 PETROLANE - REPAIRS 13630 02/03/9A 001293 RIVERSIDE COUNTY AGRISU 13631 02/03/94 001295 BEHAVIOR ANALYS]~ TRAIN 13632 02/03/9~ 001296 RED LION HOTEL 13633 02/03/9~ 001297 CALIFORNIA TRUCK EQUII~ 13634 02/03/94 001298 UNIVERSITY EXTENSION 13635 02/03/94 00129~ RIVERSIDE COUNTY BUILDI CITY OF TENECULA VOLJCIIER/CNECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTIOM PAID ADS FOR CHRISTHAS DISCX3UNT REIMB/CEGA gORKSHOP IRRIGATION PARTS AND EQ IRRIGATION PARTS AND EQ HOOD/BRAKE CABLE CREDIT AC_r~_JNT NUllER 190-180-999-5254 190-180-999-5254 001-161-999-5261 190-180-~99-5212 190-180-999-5212 310-162-9~-521/, 3~0-199-999-5250 COFFEE SERVICE FOR CiTY 340-199-999-5250 COFFEE SERVICE FOR CiTY 3Z,0-199-999-5250 REPLACE REAR TIRE CLASS I MEMBERSHIP LABE RENTAL ON TOILETS RENTAL/PORTABLE TOILETS 8 BAGS 100 LB SILICA SA TAX PAINT & SUPPLIES MICROFOM & DATA STORAGE CHRISTleAS CARDS VEHICLE RAINTEN/iCE RENEU REGISTRATION/PEST TRAINING CLASS FEB 1~-1 CHIA CONF/2 ]NVEST]GATO REPLACE TOOL BO~ HINGE I,R:)RKSHUP/CRAIG BUIZ COUNTY ORDINANCE 001-170-999-521/, 001-1(>2-999-5228 190-180-999-5238 190-180-99~-5238 100-164-~-5218 100-16~-999-5218 100-164-999-5218 001-120-99~-5250 001-162-999-5222 310-180-999-521~ 190-180-999-5226 001-170-999-5261 001-170-999-5261 100-164-999-5215 001-161-999-5261 001-120-~9-5222 TOTAL CHECKS ITEM AHOUNT 198.60 19.86- 1A5.00 515.01 57.96 39.38 123.15- 121.56 10.00 192.23 30.00 455.00 200.00 25.20 1.95 162.87 176.68 58.85 10.00 228.00 1~8.2z~ 30.60 195.00 5.00 PAGE 7 CHECK AHOUNT 178.74 145.00 5?2.97 39.38 8.A1 192.23 30.00 655.00 27.15 162.87 176.68 58.85 10.00 228.00 1~8.2A 30.60 195.00 5.00 173,132.06 VOUCHRE2 02/10/94 16:16 CITY OF TENECLILA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOil ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 1~0 CONI4UNITY GERV]CES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL I!4PROVENENT PROJ FIJtR) 250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD 280 REDEVELOPI4ENT AGENCY - CZP 300 INSURANCE FUND 310 VEHICLES FUNO INFORIqATION SYSTEHS 330 COPY CENTER FUND 340 FACILITIES TOTAL NIXINT 4),267.3& 10,316.67 9,119.27 245.67 2,01).45 6,759.50 6,458.20 263.61 4,727.10 243.88 8F,,0~1.13 vou(r CITY OF TBIECULA 02/~ 16:16 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NLIHBER DATE NDI4BER NMIE DESCHIPTIOR NLIiBER ITEM AleXlilT CHECK ANOUNT 13535 02/09/94 001306 HARCH AIR FORCE BASE ROON DEPOSIT 001-100-999-5258 200.00 200.00 353813 02/10/96 OOO~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~4 SOl 001-2070 353813 02/10/9A 000/.-~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 000644 ND! 100-2070 353813 02/10/9~ 0004,/~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 00064~ SOl 190-2070 353813 02/10/9~ 000~ FIRSTAX (EDO) 0004/k~ SOl 191-2070 353813 02/10/96 00~ FIRSTAX (EDD) OOL~.~ SOl 193-2070 353813 02/10/96 OOO444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 00044~ SOl 3Q0-2070 353813 02/10/96 ~ FIRSTAX CEDD) ~ SOl 320-2070 353813 02/10/96 000/~-~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 00O644 NDZ 33Q-2070 353813 02/10/96 00~ FIRSTAX CEDD) 000~ SOZ 3~0-2070 353813 02/10/94 OOO~ FIRSTAX (EDD) ~ STATE 001-2070 353813 02/10/96 000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 00e/:~ STATE 1Q0-2070 353813 02/10/94 00042~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 00~ STATE 190-Z070 353813 02/10/96 O00444 FIRSTAX CE003 OOO~.-~ STATE 191-2070 353813 02/10/96 OOO444 FIRSTAX CEDD) OCX:X4~ STATE 193-2070 353813 02/10/94 0004~ FIRSTAX CEDD) 00~.~ STATE 3Q0-2070 353813 02/10/96 00O4/,4 FIRSTAX (EDD) OOe~ STATE 32O-2070 353813 02/10/94 000~44 FIRSTAX (EDD) QOO~.~ STATE 330-2070 3737" 02/10/9~ 000283 FIRSTAX (ZRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070 37'~ 02/10/9~ 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 100-2070 373762 02/10/9~ 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070 373762 02/10/9~ 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 191-2070 373762 02/10/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 373762 02/10/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070 373762 02/10/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-2070 373762 02/10/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 3)0-2070 373762 02/10/9/, 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 HEDiCARE 001-2070 373762 02/10/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE 100-2070 373762 02/10/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 HEDICARE 190-2070 373762 02/10/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 HEDICARE 191-2070 373762 02/10/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE 193-2070 373762 02/10/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE )00-2070 373762 02/10/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE )20-2070 373762 02/10/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 HEDICARE 330-2070 373762 02/10/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE 3/,0-2070 397685 01/28/96 001300 FIRSTAX (QTR ADJUSTNENT 001300 ADJ TAXE 001-2070 1,261.96 302.10 27'5.68 8.56 28.56 9.90 32.37 10.25 12.39 2,655.67 676.68 679.18 20.96 25.13 55.29 15.71 9,973.83 2,739.06 2,201.81 82.55 245.0/, 81.28 2/,6.26 89.27 2,847.32 673.88 614.62 19.06 22.10 22.86 27,64 9.72 5,718.79 20,022,28 13639 02/10/96 HAYO, GARY TCSO REFUND/14AYO, GARY 19O-183-6982 30.00 30.00 136~0 02/10/96 BORDERS, KIN TCSD REFUND/BOIIDERS, KI 19O'183'6982 90.00 9O.00 13641 02/10/94 i/ALLY DYE CONSTRUCTION ENG REFUND/1JALLY DYE CO 001'163'4379 40.00 13642 02/10/96 LULY'S BL REFUND/LULY'S 001-19O-6056 35.00 35,00 13643 02/10/96 SPORTS LOOK PIZT. A EL REINB/SPORTS LOOK P! 001-19O-6056 13c, 02/10/96 000101 APPLE ONE TEI4POitARY SERVICES FOR 280-19O-999-5250 35.00 103.20 35.00 103.20 VOUCHRE2 02/10/96 16:16 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CNECKREGISTER FOG ALL PERlOGS VOUCHER/ CHECK NLIIER CHECK DATE ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AROUNT CHECK 136~5 13~5 136J~ 1:3647 13647 13~J,8 13648 13648 136~8 13648 13649 13649 13649 13649 13649 13649 13650 13650 13~50 02/10/96. 02/10/96 02/10/96 02/10/94 02/10/.9~ 02/10/96 02/10/9~ 02/10/9/, 02/10/96 02/10/96 02/10/96 02/10/9/, 02/10/94, 02/lO/We 02/10/96 02/10/96 02/10/96 02110196 02/10/96 0001~8 0001~8 0001~6 00018~ 000184. OOO184. 000184 000184 000184, 0O0186 000186 CITICORP NORTH NERICA CITICORP NOGTH HRICA COUNTS UNLIMITED FEDERAL EXPRESS FEDERAL EXPRESS GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GTE CAL1FOGNIA INCOGPOR GTE CALIFOGNIA INCOGPOR GTE CALIFOGNIA INCORPOR GTE CALIFOGNIA INCORPOR GTE CALIFOGNIA ]NCORPOR GTE CALIFOGNIA ]NCORPOR HANKS HARDtIARE HANKS HARDMARE HANKS HARDVARE PHONE SYSTEH PAYMENT PHONE SYSTEM PAYMENT TRAFFIC CENSUS PROGRN4 PRIOGITY HAIL PRIOGITY HAIL OGWiNIZER/PORTFOLIO NISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES MISC. OFFICE SIJPPLIES RETURNED OGGANIZER 909-69~-1900 JAN 009-6W,-1989 JAN 009-69~-1900 DEC 009-694-6400 JAN 009-695-3539 JAN 009-699-2309 MISC. SMALL TOOLS & SUP INV)~12f MISC. SUPPLIES ' NUTS, 13651 02/10/96 000196 ZCHA RETIREMENT TRUST 6 O001f~ DEF CONP 1)651 02/10/96 0001~4 Z(34A RETIRElENT TRUST 6 000196 DEF COI4P 13651 02/10/94 0001~, ICNA RETIRElENT TRUST 6 0001~(, DEF CONP 13651 02/10/96 000196 [CHA RETIRElENT TRUST 6 000196 DEF COl4P 13651 02/10/96 000194 [CMA RETIREMENT TRUST 6 0Q0196 DEF COMP 13651 02/10/96 OO0196 IC~A RETIREMENT TRUST 4 Q00196 DEF COW 13651 02/10/94 000196 ICNA RETIRElENT TRUST 4 OOO196 DEF COMP JENNACO LUNCH & STUFF CATERING 02/10/9~ 02/10/94 13652 13653 000201 000214 PROVIDE CUSTODIAL HAINT 02107C/C MEETING 13654 02/10/96 000246 PERS EleLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PER REDE 13654 02/10/96 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PER REDE 13656 02/10/96 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 13654 02/10/96 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRBI 000246 PERS RET 13654 02/10/96 000246 PERS ENPLOVEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 13656 02/10/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 PERS RET 13654 02/10/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 13654 02/10/96 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 13656 02/10/96 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 13654 02/10/96 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 13654 02/10/96 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 13654 02/10/96 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 13654 02/10/96 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 13656 02/10/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' ItETIREN 000246 SURVIVOR 320 - 199- 999 - 5391 320-2800 100-164-999-5406 001-110-999-52:50 001-140-999-5230 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 344)-199-999-5242 100-164-999-5242 100-164-999-5242 001-2080 100-2080 190-2080 191-2080 19~-2080 300-2080 340-2080 100-182-999-5212 001-I00-999-5260 001-2130 100-2130 001-2390 100-2390 190-2390 191-2390 193-2390 3000-2300 320-2300 330-2390 340-2390 100-Z$90 2~7.~7 1,12~.60 800.00 19.00 9.50 73.00 36.53 47.95 17.53- 52.53- 983.91 1,152.07 415.35- 55O.95 21.37 20.3~ ~.41 118.~ 2,173.01 564.16 496.96 3~.08 41.66 25.36 50.00 400. O0 80.00 107.35 107.35 11,364.78 2,?03.05 2,459.15 80.06 284.39 95.92 232.35 122.01 58.24 12.54 13.02 1,427.57 800.00 28.5O 87.42 2,313.29 ) 236.52 3,385.23 400. O0 80.00 VOUC'~'' CITY OF TBIECULA 02/1, 16:16 VOUCHER/CHECI~ REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEN ACCCXJNT NUNBER DATE NUNBER NAME DESCRIPTIOR NtBIBER ITEM ANOUNT CHErJC AIKX. INT 13656 02/10/94 00024~ PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REN 08024~ SURVIVOR 191-23~0 13656 02/10/96 0002~6 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 0802/~ SURVIVOR 193-23~0 13656 02/10/96 OOO266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREH 080266 SURVIVOR 300-2390 13656 02/10/W, 0002/,6 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN O002~& SURVIVOR 320-23~0 13656 02/10/W, 00024~ PERS EHPLOYEES' RETIREN 000266 SURVIVOR 13656 02/10/W, 0002/~ PERS EMPLOYEES' RETZRB! 0002/,6 SURVIVOR :~0-23~0 .62 1.~4 .93 .~r3' 17,750.18 13655 02/10/9~ 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 001-150-~9-5260 13655 02/10/~6 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 320-1~-~-5262 13655 02/10/94 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 001-162-~-5262 13655 02/10/94 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 001-161-~j~-5250 13655 02/10/g6 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 081-161-~-5220 13655 02/10/W, 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 001-161-~;~-5258 13655 02/10/94 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 081-1~3-~-5260 13655 02/10/9/+ 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 081-163-999-5220 18.71 27.85 6.57 12.~3 10.73 30.00 55.5~ 56.57 218.~0 13656 02/10/9/+ 000251 PLANNING CENTER, INC. T DEVELOPMENT CODE PROCES 001'161'999'52~8 13656 02/10/9/+ 000251 PLANNING CENTER, INC. T GENERAL PLAN CONTRACT 001-161-~-5248 281.56 593./~ 875.00 13657 02/10/9/+ 000253 POSTMASTER KAImF. A lID CLC~__.~RE NOTIC 001-163-~-5230 13~, ,~2/10/9/+ 00025/+ PRESS-ENTERPRISE CClFAN DISPLAY RDVERTZSEIIENT/S 1~0-180-~-525~ 56.8?. 133.20 56.82 133.20 13659 02/10/9/+ 000268 RIVERSIDE COUNTY HANITA JANUARY 94 K-RAT PAY!fEN 001-2300 3,000.00 13660 02/10/9/+ 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS ESCAPADES GAlE 190-180-999-5301 13660 02/10/9/+ 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS CAULDRON OF HALLMEN I 1~0-180-~)9-5301 13&~0 02/10/94 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS RAG RASETS 1~0-180-~-5301 13660 02/10/9/+ 000277 S & S ANTS AND C!L~FTS PLAYTIME PUPPETS 190-180-999-5301 13660 02/10/9/+ 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS BINGO 190-180-g99-5301 13660 02/10/9/+ 000277 $ & S ARTS AND CRAFTS FOAM DART GARE SAFTEE 190-180-999-5301 13660 02/10/96 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS AC-63-BUTTOR PARTS g/llY 190-180-999-5301 13660 02/10/9/+ 000277 S & S ANTS AND CRAFTS BIGG]E CAKES 190-180-999-5301 13660 02/10/96 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS FREIGHT 190-180-999-5301 31.~ 7.95 20.99 ?.3.89 19.~ 10.69 ~.~ 33.50 211 .~5 136~1 02/10/96 00027g SAYRE, RiCK REI!I/SHERIFF'S ABARD D GOl-100-gs~-5260 64.00 64.00 13662 02/10/9/+ 000307 TENECULA TROPHY CO. PLACQUE FOR CITY NANAGE 001-2170 67.12 13663 02/10/94 000308 TEMECULA TOgN AS$OCIAT] RENT 2/9~-SET UP & CLEA 081-100-999-5236 576.00 576.00 13666 02/10/96 0003Z5 UNITED gAY OF THE INLAN QQQ3Z5 UU 081-2120 13666 02/10/96 000325 UNITED ttAY OF THE INLAN 000325 Ug 108-2120 1366~ 02/10/96 000325 UNITED gAY OF THE INLAN 008325 UV lg0-2120 83.25 2.25 17.00 102.50 13665 02/10/94/, 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 2 SETS OF UNIFORMS CLEA 100-164-999-5263 13665 02/10/96 080326 UNZTOG RENTAL SERVICE M TAGS 108-164-~-52/+3 13665 02/10/W, 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 6 SETS OF UNIFORIIS 100-164-~-5263 13665/.02/10/94 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE NAT RENTALS 3~0-199-999-5250 13(x J2/10/94 000332 VAND~PE CHOU AS$OCIATi PLAN CHECKS JANUARY 96 001-162-~-5268 30.00 1.~ 25.~ ~.50 528 ~0.23 528.65 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA 02/10/9~ 14:16 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE i M DESCRIPTION lilJBER ]TEN cHECK 13667 02/10/~ 0003~8 ZIGLER, GAIL REFHESHIENTS C~O 190-180-9;9-5260 30.00 30.00 13668 02/10/94 000370 BIRDGALL, PATRICIA REIN LEAGUE OF CA CITIE 001-100-~;~-5258 3&.20 13669 02/10/94 000389 USCII/PEBSCO, (ONEA) 000389 PT RETIR 001'2160 1)&&~ 02/10/94 00038~ USCI4/PEBSCO, (ONEA) 000~ PT RETIR 100-2160 1:3669 02/10/94 000389 USCN/PEBSCO, (OBRA) 000389 PT RETZR 190'2160 97.80 87.00 121.70 306.50 13670 02/10/f4 000395 ECONOMIC DEVELOPtENT CO BOOTH FEE AT TRERDS 200 280-199-~9-52~ 575.00 575.00 13671 02/10/~ 00040~ 13671 02/10/~ 000~0~ 13671 02/10/W~ O00&O~ 13671 02/10/9/* O00&O~ 13671 02/10/~ 000~0~ 13671 02/10/~ 00040~ VALLEH SAFETY SUPPLY VALLEN SAFETY StJPPLY VALLEN SAFETY SI. FPLY VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY ADAPTER AV2000 100-164-~-5218 XL 16832&0 COVEEALLS VI 100-164-999-5218 )(XL 16832/*0 COVEPALLS V 100-1~4-999-5218 )O0(L 16832/*0 COVERALLS 100-1~4-f99-5218 FREIGHT 100-1~4-999-5218 TAX 100-164-999-5218 25.2~ 45.00 45.00 5.23 10.24 172.76 13672 02/10/94 000~28 HORIZON VATER VATER CHARGE 190-182-999-5240 76.15 76.15 13673 02/10/W, OOGG81 GEOTECHNZCAL & ENVIRONM PRO GEOTECHNZCAL INVEST 280-199-805-5802 13&7/* 02/10/94 0004~ CALIFORNIA ASSOC. FOR L CALED ANNUAL IENBERSHIP 001-110-;-5226 780.00 55.00 13675 02/10/W, 000580 PHOTO gORKS DEV/PR]NTS/SLIDES 100-180-999-5301 18.(Y, 18.0/, 1:5676 02/10/9/* O005W} LEAGUE OF CA CITZESILAF REGISTRATION/Pg OFFICE 001-103-~-5261 510.00 510.00 13677 02/10/94 0006~3 FORTNER HARDgARE NISC. SUPPLIES AND EQU! 100-180-FF)-5212 70.72 70.72 13678 02/10/~, 000645 SMART &F]NAL OPEN P.O. FOR RECREATIO 100-180-~-5301 64.T1 13679 02/10/W, 000~53 LUCKY STORE COOKIE NOMSTER CLASS SU lf0-183-~-5320 50.00 50.00 13680 02/10/94 000680 AHS-TNS RECHARGE POSTAGE ACCCXJN 001-100-;-5230 13080 02/10/W, 000080 AHS-TNS RECHARGE POSTAGE ACCOUN 001-110-~-5230 13680 02/10/94 000680 AHS-TMS RECHARGE POSTAGE ACCOUN 001-120-999-5230 13680 02/10/W, 000680 AHS-THS RECHARGE POSTAGE ACC(XJN 001-1/*0-~-5230 13680 02/10/94 000680 AHS-THS RECHARGE POSTAGE ACCOUN 001-150-999-5230 13680 02/10/94 000680 AHS-TNS RECHARGE POSTAGE ACCOUN 001-161-999-5230 13680 02/10/94 000680 ANS-TN$ RECHARGE POSTAGE ACCOUN 001-1~0 13680 02/10/94 000680 AHS-TMS RECHARGE POSTAGE ACCOUN 001-163-999-5230 13680 02/10/94 000680 N4S-TMS RECHARGE POSTAGE ACCOUN 1fO-180-~qg-5230 13680 02/10/94 001)680 ANS-TMS RECHARGE POSTAGE ACCOUN 320-199-999-5230 13681 02/10/~4 00070~ SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 1gO-180-;-52&3 13681 02/10/W, 00070& SKS, ]NC./INLARD OIL FUEL 001-162-~-52d3 13681 02/10/W, 00070/, SKS, ]NC./INLANO OIL FUEL 100-164-~Jg-52d3 13681 02/10/~/, 00070/, SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 1~0-180-~-52d3 13681 02/10/W, O0070& SKS, INC./INLAND OIL IqJ~L 001-162-;-5;7.~3 1)681 02/10/W, O0070& SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 100-164-;-5263 13681 02/10/W, 000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 001-110-ffg-52d3 2.61 25.00 191.14 77/, 132 218.67 54.62 110.19 176.60 6.49 41.72 324.~ 78.83 59.B 3~.~ 23.80 1,69Z.59 VOU(7/"' C%TY OF TE14ECULA 02/1, 14:16 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITE14 ACCOUNT NUHBER DATE NUI4BER MANE DESCRIPTION NU146ER ITEH N4OLRIT CHE~ AJ4OtJNT 13682 02/10/9~ 000712 FORD, STEVEN J. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES C 250-190-129-581X 13682 02/10/9/, 000712 FORD, STEVEN J. DEC 93 CRC PROJECT CO-O 250-190-129-5804 13683 02/10/9~ 000?28 RARSEY BACKFLOM & PLLNB BACKFLOM PREVENTION DEY 190-180-999-5250 13683 02/10/94 000?28 RANSEY BACKFLOU & PLLNB BACKFLOIJ PREVENTIOR DEV 193-180-999-5415 13683 02/10/9~ 000?28 RAHSEY BACKFLW & PLIJII BACKFLOg PREVENTION DEV 190-180-999-5250 13684 02/10/9~ 00075~ ELLZOTT GROUP, THE PLAN CHECK SERVICES 193-180-999-5250 3,200.00 2,560.00 92.00 400.02 199.98 5,760.00 692.00 900.00 13685 02/10/94 000837 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TA 000837 FRAIl TAX 001-2140 13685 02/10/94 000837 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TA 000837 FIL4N TAX 100-2140 93.49 93.50 186,99 13686 02/10/94 000881 OAKRIDGE LANDSCAPE/]RR] ADD'L UORK/NOg]NG & TRE 210-190-134-580~ 13686 02/10/94 000881 OAKRIDGE LANDSCAPEIIRRI LANDSCAPE & 90 DAY RAIN 100-16~-999-5401 473.00 297.00 770.00 13687 02/10/94 000927 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE SOIL TECH 11/02 250-190-129-5804 64.00 13688 02/10/94 0009/,6 DISCOUNT FEED & TACK IMS CHUCK 4IN FOOl) 6OI-170-999-5327 53.85 53.85 13689 02/10/94 000993 FREEDO~ COFFEE, INC. 13f*""02/10/94 000~3 FREEDOM COFFEE, INC. COFFEE SERVICE FOR CITY 3&0-199-999-5250 COFFEE SERVICE FOR CITY 340-199-999-5250 156.39 .25- 156.14 13690 02/10/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5~03910032 NJII JA 001-140-999-5258 13690 02/10/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5473666403910940 PB JAN 001-100-999-5258 13690 0Z/10/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 54z73,~f,~03910073 RP JAN 001-100-999-5258 1369O 02/10/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 54'7'4~03910081 JAN RR 001-100-999-5258 1369O 02/10/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5473,~%03910164 NOV SM 001-100-999-5258 307.94 99.75 140.08 38O.67 108J0- 818.6~ 13691 02/10/94 001028 MEYER, CHUCK CABLE INSTALLATION (CRC 250-190-129-5804 800.00 800.00 13692 02/10/94 001065 USON/PEBSCO (DEF. COle>. 001065 DEF CONP 001-2080 13692 02/10/94 001065 USC3q/PEBSCO (DEF. C014P. 001065 DEF COI~ 100-2080 13692 02/10/94 001065 USC3q/PEBSCO (DEF. COMP. 001'065 DEF CDMP 190-2080 13692 02/10/94 001065 USCN/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065 DEF CONP 300-2080 13692 02/10/94 001065 USC14/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065 DEF C014P 320-2080 13693 02/10/94 001096 BOLAR, HIRSCH & JENNING 14ISC RESEARCH 001-140-999-5248 3,04.0.30 197.98 156.32 3.46 312.50 100.00 3,710.56 160.00 13694 02/10/94 001142 RARKHAN & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING SERVICES AS 190-180-999-5250 13694 02/10/94 OO1142 HARKHAM & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING SERVICES AS 190-180-9O9-5250 13694 02/10/94 001142 lIARKHAN & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING SERVICES AS 190-180-999-5250 &6.00 87.60 125.00 2/8.6O 13695 02/10/94 001152 14 & P UNDERGROUND, INC. UNDERGROUND UTILITY JOl 250-190-129-580~ 135.50 135.50 13696 02/10/94 001193 CONP USA, INC. 262691 FUTURE DON/kIN SC 001-170-999-5221 13696 02/10/9~ 001193 CORP USA, INC. FREIGHT 001-170-999-5221 13696 02/10/94 001193 CONP USA, INc. TAX 001-170-999-5221 102.~ 5.00 7.~ 115.75 1:3697/._02/10/94 001212 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS 12127-1/26 190-181-999-5240 1367 J2/10/94 001240 OLD TINN TE14ECOLA NERCH ROD RUN '94 SPONSORSHIP a!0-199-999-5264 130.9o 5,000.00 130 5,000.00 VOUCHREZ 02/10/94 VOUCHER/ CHECK NtJNBER 13700 13701 13701 13701 13701 13701 13702 13703 1370~ 1370~ 13705 13706 14:16 CHECK DATE 02/10/94 02/10/94 02/10/94 02/10/94 02/I0/W, 02/1 02/10/~4 02/10/96 02/10/9~. 02/10/94 02/10/94 02/1 02/10/94 VENOOR I.IBER 001270 001279 001280 001280 001280 001280 001280 001302 001303 001304 001304 001305 001307 VENDOR leAHE G.R. GLEDSON CONSTRUCTI RANCHO NEMS PETROLARE - REPAIRS PETROLARE - REPAIRS PETROLARE - REPAIRS PETROLARE - REPAIRS PETROLARE - REPAIRS SENATE RULES CORNITTEE ANERZCA'S FINEST D]XIEL INDIO, CITY OF INDIO, CITY OF PUBLIC RETIREHENT JOURN F[ELDINGS CITY OF TENEClJLA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITBI DESCRIPTION INSTALL SLIDE SECTION P DISPLAY AD FOR COIII. N]T FUEL/B&S FUEL/B&S SERVICE FOR PROPANE VEH VEHICLE REPAIR SERVICE FOR PROPANE VEH SPECIAL DISTRICT RIL]C HENBERSHIP DUES HAYORS & COUNCILS COlIF CITY NANAGER ACCOUNT NLNBER 190-180-9~-5212 001-100-999-5254 001-162-999-5263 001-162-999-5263 310-162-999-5214 310-162-999-5214 310-162-999-5214 001-163-999-5228 190-180-999-5226 001 - 100-999-5258 001-110-9~-5258 RETIRElENT TRAINING SEN' 001-140-~-5258 6V BATTERIES 100-164-~-5218 TOTAL CHECKS ITEN NIOUNT 100.00 125.00 9,8~ 6.59 288.67 124.15 247.60 4.31 10,00 26.00 13.00 270.00 52.17 ~ 6 CHECK ANOUNT 100,00 125.00 676.90 4.31 10.00 39.00 270.00 85,061.13 02/1 15:14 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAG~ FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 COleUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 19) TC$1) SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL INPROVENENT PROJ FUND 250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD 280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - CIP TOTAL mT 23,668.81 ~6,355.82 30,590.98 475.00 24,418.38 567,279.03 196,925.00 3,23~.30 8~2,W~7.32 VOUCHRE2 02/10/9/, 15:14 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUNBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NUHBER NANE ITEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUI4BER ITEN AI4OUNT CHECK N4OUNT 13710 13711 13711 13711 13711 13711 13712 13712 13712 13712 13712 13712 13713 13714 13716 13714 13716 02/22/96 02/22/94 02/22/9/, 02/22/94 02/22/~4 02/22/94 02/22/94 02/22/94 02/22/~4 02/22/96 02/22/96 02/22/94 02/22/94/, 02/22/96 02/22/94 02/22/94 02/22/~4 000123 000126 000126 000126 000126 000126 000135 000135 000135 000135 000135 000135 000230 000238 000238 000238 000238 BURKE MILLIAHS & SOltENS CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER NUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES FINAL TOUCH HARKETING FINAL TOUCH HARKETING FINAL TOUCH NARKETING FINAL TOUCH HARKET]NG DEC RETAINER SERVICES IONTHLY LDSP NAINTENANC LANDSCAPE NAINTENANCE NEDIANS SERVICE AREA KENT HINTERGARDT PARK [RRIGATIOR REPAIRS ' RI TYPE I BARRICADES TAX BIKE LANE ll)RD/SYH NISC. HARDHARE FOR SIGN NISC. HARDMARE FOR SIGN SIGN & HARDHAND ASSESSIlENT ADHINISTRATI COORDINATION TABLOID DE PRODUCTIGN/AD FILH EDITORIAL SUPPORT TAX 001-130-999-5246 1~0-180-999-5250 190-180-W9-5250 191-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5250 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-9~-5212 100-164-999-52z~ 100-1~4-~-5244 100-164-999-52~4 190-180-999-5370 280-1~-~-5264 280-199-~-5264 280-199-999-5264 280-199-~-5264 3,150.00 4,068.66 175.00 675.00 3,326.31 417.76 456.00 35.34 113.78 534.96 20.69 306.01 1,574.74 ~50.00 120.00 2,000.00 164.30 3,150.00 8,442.73 1,466.76 1,574.76 3 "~30 13715 13715 13715 13715 13715 13715 13715 13716 13716 13716 13717 13717 1)718 13719 13719 13719 137Z0 137~0 13720 137Z1 137~1 02/22/94 02/22/96 02122196 02/22/96 02/22/96 02/22/96 02/22/96 02/22/96 02/22/9~ 02/22/94 02/22/94 02/22/94 02/22/96 02/22/96 02/22/94 02/22/94 02/22/96 02/22/96 02/22/94 02/22/94 02/22/94 000260 000260 000240 000260 000260 000260 000260 000539 000539 000539 000678 000678 000712 000864 0008~ 000864 000929 000929 000929 001013 001013 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING WII4HER YN4ADA ASSOCIATE WINHER YA!4ADA ASSOCIATE WINNER YANADA ASSOCIATE RIVERSIDE COUNTY HEALTH RIVERSIDE COUNTY HEALTH FORD, STEVEN J. CORONA CLAY CO. CORONA CLAY CO. CORONA CLAY CO. T.B. PENICK & SONS, INC T.B. PENICK & SONS, INC T.B. PENICK & SONS, INC HINDERLITER deLANAS & A HINDERLITER deLANAS & A AREA'S 2, 3 AND 4 RESTRIPING & STENCILING STRIPING WORK RESTRIPE CITY WIDE REPA 2ND COAT RANCHO CAL ND. NEW "25" N.P.H. LEGENDS RESTRIPING & STENCIL CR PALA ND PARK LDSP SERVI PROFESSIONAL SER. IO/1- NOV 9) PALA ND PARK ANIHAL CONTROL ANINAL CONTROL CO-ORD SERVICES JAN 94 'ANGEL NIX' BRICKDUST 'HOUND NIX' CLAY HATER/ TAX CRC/SPORTS PARK CONSTRU CHANGE ORDER 5 CONPLETI RETENTION CONTRACT SERVICES FOR C CONTRACT X PANfiT FOR 100-166-ggg-5410 100-164-999-5410 100-164-999-5410 100-164-~-5410 100-164-~99-5410 100-164-999-5410 100-164-999-5410 210-1~0-120-5802 210-190-120-5802 210-190-120-5802 001-172-~-5255 001-172-~-5255 250-190-129-580~ 190-180-99f-5212 190-180-999-5212 1f0-180-99~-5212 250-190-129-580~ 250-190-129-5804 250-2035 001-140-99~-52~8 001-140-~-52~8 1,566.50 10,000.00 5,900.00 9,364.19 2,500.00 32.00 7,000.00 1,545.00 2,088.44 61.59 5,151.80 4,963.61 6,020.00 2,250.00 1,500.00 290.e3 208,765.00 3,351.71 21,211.71' 900. O0 9,523.40 36,362.69 3,695.03 10,095.41 6,020.00 4,060.63 190,905.00 10,~40 13722 02/22/94 001014 COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS CONSTRUCT]ON OF PRE-CAS 190-180-999-5244 3,537.60 02/~ VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 13722 13722 13723 13723 13723 13723 13723 13723 13723 13723 13723 13723 13723 13723 1372~ 13725 13725 1~_ CHECK DATE 02/22/~ 02/22/W. 02/22/94 02/22/94 02/22/94 02/22/94 02/22/W. 02/22/94 02/22/94 02/22/94 02/22/94 02/2Z/~4 02/22/~4 02/22/94 02/22/94 02/22/9~ 02/22/W~ VENDOR NUMBER 001014 001014 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001072 001270 001270 00128~ NAME COlJIITRY SIGNS & DESIGNS COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE BANK OF MERICA NT & SA CITY WIDE ELECTRONIC SY CITY W[DE ELECTRORIC SY AAA PAVING COMPANY CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER]CI)S ITEM DESCRIPTION CONSTRUCTION OF FOUNDAT TAX JANUARY LDSP NAINTENANC DEC SLOPE A SLOPE A JAN NAINT DEC BR]DLEVALE/VIRANDA BRIDLEVALE/V]RANDA LDSP PROVIDE ALL LABOR All) M LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT TURF RENOVATION 3 SOIL ~LES 1 RECOIIqENDATIGN I.,AliDSCAPE MAINTENANCE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CONST FUND ACCT 1173839 VAN]OUS ELECTRONIC ]NST TAX STREET IMPROVEMENTS ACCOUNT Ht,I, IEER 1~0-180-~-52~, 1~0-180-~-52~ lf$-180-~)~-5415 1~-180-~-5415 1~-180-9~-5415 19~J-180-f~-5415 1~J-180-~-5415 19r5-180-9~-5415 1~0-180-~-5212 190-180-~-5212 1~0-180-~-5212 1~O-180-~-5212 195-180-9~-5415 193-180-~-5415 1~-181-~;)-5212 1~0-181 -~q~-5212 100-166,-~-5402 ITEM AMOUNT 2,667.50 206.7~ 11,302.24 4,295.00 4,295.00 405.97 405.97 1,314.20 7,020.00 300.00 135.00 40.00 1,500.00 900.00 563,584.00 2,422.00 187.71 9,017.71 PAGE 2 CHECK N,~:XmT 6,611.83 31,913.38 563,58~.00 2,60~.71 9,017.71 TOTAL CHECKS 892,~7.32 ITEM NO. 4 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAl CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer February 22, 1994 'No Paring' Zone on Avenida Barca from Humbar Drive to Via Monterey PREPARED BY: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer ~'/~'~' RECOMMENDATION: The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING 'NO PARKING' ZONE ON AVENIDA BARCA FROM HUMBER DRIVE TO RANCHO VIA MONTEREY. BACKGROUND: The Traffic Division of the City of Temecula Public Works Department has received a request to restrict paring on Avenida Barca, between Mergerits Road and Vie Monterey, from 2:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. The citizens concerns focussed on public safety regarding driver and pedestrian movements associated with school operations. At the Public/Traffic Safety Commission a petition with 34 signatures was submitted supporting the request. Traffic signal plans are currently being reviewed by Caitrans for the intersection of Avenida Barca and Margarita Road. For optimum traffic signal operations, left turn pockets will be added to both approaches to Margarita Road on Avenida Barca. Due to available roadway widths, parking must be restricted from Humbar Drive to Via Monterey along both sides of Avenida Barca. Those vehicles displaced by the restriction will be able to stage on Margarita Road adjacent to Avenida Barca for student loading and unloading. These locations' will provide students with the opportunity to cross with the crossing guards at the intersection. Once signalized, students can utilize the pedestrian indications included with all new traffic signals. -1 - p~rpt~94~O222~beroe.hdr Existing vehicular and pedestrian traffic on Avenida Barca was observed during school peaks. Staff observed illegal U-turns, blocked driveways, double parking and dangerous backing maneuvers north of Margarita Road. We also noted pedestrians crossing midblock on Avenida Barca between parked vehicles increasing the potential for accidents. Due to existing traffic patterns and the future construction of a new traffic signal, staff recommends establishing a "No Parking" zone on Avenida Barca from Humbar Drive to Via Monterey. FISCAL IMPACT: FY93-94: Funds are available in the Department of Public Works Striping/Stenciling - Account No. 100-164-999-5410 and Signs - Account No. 100-164-999-5244. Red Curb - 300 L.F. at e.58/LF = No Parking Signs - 6 at ~125.00 = Total $174.00 8750.00 $924.00 Attachments: Resolution No. 94- Exhibit "A" Proposed Parking Restriction -2- pwO~agd~V)222%Jxme.hdr RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECUIA ESTAm.BRING *NO PARIcING, ZONE ON AVENIDA BARCA FROM HUMBER DRIVE TO VIA MONTEREY The City Council of the City of Temeeula doe~ r~,~olve, determine and order as follows: Section 1. Pursuant to Seaion 10.16.160, of the Temecula Municipal Code~ "No Parking" zone is hereby established in the City of Temecula on both sides of Avertida Barca from Humber Drive to V'm MortteaW as shown on Exhibit *A *. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVEB AND ADOPTED, by the CAW Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of February, 1994. June S. Greek, City Clerk 4- pwOb'~agdf1M%94~O222%beroa.hdr 0 ,I i ..,I T I I v::)l:lvla I I I I · i"1L I I I1~ VQINqAV W .y 0 ITEM 5 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager /~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer February 22, 1994 All Way Stop, Rancho Vista Road at Meadows Parkway PREPARED BY: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer RECOMMENDATION: The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING 'STOP SIGNS' BACKGROUND: Staff had been asked to analyze the possibility of adding two (2) stop signs on Rancho Vista Road at Meadows Parkway which would make it an all-way stop. The California Department of Transportation Traffic Manual identifies criteria along with three (3) specific warrants for the consideration of multi-way stops. Although these three (3) warrants are not met, other factors that may be considered include, sight distance, local travel patterns and any other site specific impacts. A field review revealed that southbound vehicles on Meadows Parkway, have substandard visibility of vehicles approaching from the east on Rancho Vista Road. This limitation also exists for pedestrians crossing-on their way to and from school. Existing traffic volumes entering on Pauba Road and Meadows Parkway are nearly balanced with a 48%-52% split. Considering the discussion at the Commission regarding the effect of limited visibility, driver behavior and the near balance of vehicles entering the intersection, staff supports the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommendation for two (2) additional stop signs for Rancho Vista Road at Meadows Parkway. r:~agdrpt~g4~O222~adlwey. ftplejp FISCAL IMPACT: Two (2) stop ahead signs, st ~125.00 = $250.00 Two {2) stop signs, at ~ 125.00 each = $250.00 Eight (6) legends at $24.00 = ~144.00 Limit line - 64 L.F. at $0.45 = $28.80 Four (4) all-way signs, at $5.00 = ~20.00 TOTAL $692.80 FY 93-94: Funds are available in the Department of Public Works Signs - Acct No. 100-164-999-5244. NOTE: All work to be done by City Maintenance Crews except pavement markings which are awaiting new stencil truck. Attachment: Resolution No. 94- r:~gdrpt~94%0222~llwmy.eq}iejp RF.,~LUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTARL/~!/NG "STOP" S/GNS The City Council of the City of Temm~ does resolve, determine and order as follows: Section 1. Pursuant to Section 10.12.100 of the Municipal Code, the fortowing 'STOP' sign locations are hereby established in the City of Te~. Section 2. ~solution. Westbound Rancho Vista Road @ Meadows Parkway Fastbound Rancho Vista Road @ Meadows Parkway The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this PASSED, APPROV~ AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of February, 1994. Ron Roberrs, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek City Clerk [SEAL) r:,~gdrpt'~4~O22..2~llw~/,ml~p ITEM NO. 6 ~PPROV~T. INANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: MaW Jane McLarney, Finance Officer DATE: February 22, 1994 SUBJECT: Review and Approval of the Fiscal Year 1993-94 Mid-Year Budget PREPARED BY: Luci Romero, Financial Services Administrator RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET DISCUSSION: Each year the City conducts a mid-year review of its fiscal year operating budget. The purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure that the City maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position. The Finance Department staff has performed an analysis of revenues. Additionally, all City departments have reviewed their operating budgets and the have submitted year-end expenditure projections. The mid-year review includes the General Fund, Gas Tax Fund and Internal Service Funds. Activity in each of the funds is presented in accordance with the following schedules: Schedule A - Budget Summary: Illustrates Fund Balance activity in terms of both the currently adopted budget and the recommended mid-year amended budget. Schedule A presents the beginning fund balance, revenues, expenditures and transfers, and the projected fund balance based upon this activity. Schedule B - Revenue Detail: Illustrates the revenue detail by fund source in terms of current projections, year-to-date received at 12/31/93, and mid-year revised projections. Schedule C - Expenditure Summary: Illustrates summaries of expenditures by each department within the fund. The expenditure categories are Personnel Services, Operating Expenditures, and Capital Outlay. A discussion of the significant changes. within each fund is presented below. Gmu;RAI FUND General Fund Schedule A, Budget Summary, illustrates a July 1,1993, beginning fund balance of 88,686,042. The mid-year adjusted June 30, 1994, ending fund balance represents an increase of $332,319. General Fund Schedule B, Revenue Detail, illustrates that current projected revenue is $12,930,146. The amended year-end revenue projection is $11,743,122, a decrease of $1,187,024, or approximately 9%. Significant decreases in revenues are as follows: Structural Fire Tax: Although the revenue projection has been decreased $1,373, 179, it should be noted, that this is due to a revised method of accounting for Fire Services revenues and expenditures. Thus, a corresponding decrease will be reflected in the Fire Services expenditures, resulting in no net change to the General Fund. Iicenses. Permits. end Services Cheroes: Projected Engineering revenues have been decreased $300,000 to reflect that revenue anticipated from some larger development projects will not be received. Fire Plan Check/Inspection Fees have also been decreased $15,000 in accordance with year-to-date revenue received. Projected increases in revenues are as follows: Prooertv Tax: The projection has been revised to reflect the Teeter Plan remittance. The Teeter Plan distribution schedule specifies that 85.5% of the property tax revenue will be remitted to the City during the current fiscal year. Additionally, the City will receive a one-time Teeter Plan distribution for prior year delinquent taxes. The revised year-end Property Tax revenue projection results in an increase of $176,423. Sales Tax: Based upon the revised year-end analysis, this revenue projection has been increased $68,000. General Fund Schedule C, Expenditure Summary, illustrates that General Fund expenditures have been decreased $1,519,343, or approximately 12%. Significant reductions in expenditures are as follows: Fire Services Deoartment: As indicated previously in the discussion of revenue decrease, expenditures have been reduced to reflect the Fire Services contract net billing of the Structural Fire Tax credit. Salarv Savinas From Untilled Personnel Positions: The Planning Department has salary savings from an unfilled Planning Technician. The Engineering Department has savings from untilled Associate Engineer and Engineering Technician positions. Sales Tax Reimbursement: The Costco sales tax reimbursement of $110,000 has been moved to the Redevelopment Agency budget, in accordance with the reimbursement agreement. 2 Significant increases in expenditures are as follows: City Attornev neoartment: Reflects an increase of 887,000 due to unenticipated litigation; i.e., WaI-Mart, McDowell. Buildino & Safety Department: Reflects an overall increase of ~29,186 due to personnel related expenditures. Based upon an increase in building permit activity, the Building & Safety Department has requested to fund · previously untilled Building Technician position. Additionally, appropriations have been included for pert-time end contract code enforcement and inspection services. GAS TAX FUND Gas Tax Fund Schedule A illustrates that s nominal fund balance will be reflected at June 30, 1994. However, it should be noted that the transfers from the General end Local Transportation Funds will be adjusted at year-end to reflect year-end actuals in expenditures. The result will be a zero fund balance. Gas Tax Fund Schedule B illustrates mid-year revised revenues of e576,899. This e9,541 increase is due to an increase in the investment interest end reimbursements projections. Gas Tax Fund Schedule C illustrates year-end expenditures of $2,041,382, · decrease of $15,770. Expenditure reductions ere primarily attributable to an untilled Public Works Inspector position. INTERNAL SFRVICE FUNDS The Internal Service Funds are utilized to finance and account for activities involved in rendering services to departments within the City. The Insurance Fund is used to finance and account for the City's risk management and insurance programs. The Vehicles Fund is used for the operation, maintenance and timely replacement of City vehicles. The Information Systems Fund is used to account for the cost of providing electronic data processing equipment and software and central telephone services. The Copy Center Fund is used to account for the cost of providing central mailing and reprographic services. The Facilities Fund is used to account for the cost of providing facility maintenance and operations. Increases in expenditures ere reflected in the Vehicles, Copy Center and Facilities Funds. The Vehicles Fund increase is due to higher than anticipated maintenance costs in the City Manager's Department. The Copy Center Fund increase results from unanticipeted costs for maintenance agreements. The Facilities Fund increase is due to increased costs for City Hall maintenance. Although these increases result in higher service charges to City departments, the increases do not significantly impact the departments. SPt:CIAL RL=VENUI: FUNDS & CAPITAL PROJI:CT FUND Exhibit I Special Revenue Funds and Exhibit II Capital Projects Fund are presented to illustrated mid-year activity within each of the funds. 3 AUTHORIZFD POSITIONS Exhibit III illustrates the City-wide allocation of personal. The total number of authorized positions remains unchanged. Currently, there are 101.0 authorized positions. FISCAL IMPACT: The mid-year adjusted budget projections result in an increase in the year-end fund balance of $332,319. Attachments: Resolution General Fund Schedules A through C Gas Tax Fund Schedules A through C Internal Services Funds Schedules A through C Exhibit I Special Revenue Funds: - Reimbursement District Fund - Development Impact Fund - Community Development Block Grant Fund - Measure "A" Fund - Local Transportation Fund Exhibit II Capital Projects Fund Exhibit III - Personnel Allocation By Department (City-wide) 4 RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEIVlECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET WHKU~AS, each year a mid-year ~ is conducted of City operating budgets. Wlik;REAS, the purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure that the City maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position. WH~:uR~,S, the mid-year review has been completed and the recommended adjustments are reflected in Schedules A through C of the City's General Fund; Gas Tax Fund; and Internal Service Fun&. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. That the Fiscal Year 1993-94 General Fund Annual Operating Budget is hereby amended in accordance with Schedules A through C. Section 2. That the Fiscal Year 199394 Gas Tax Fund Annual Operating Budget is hereby amended in accordance with Schedules A through C. Seetlon 3. That the Fiscal Year 1993-94 Internal Service Funds Budget is hereby amended in accordance with Schedules A through C. Section 4. That all the terms and conditions of Resolution No. 9349, which adop~ the Fiscal Year 1993-94 budget shall remain the same. PASS!~, APPROVI~ AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of February, 1994. ATTEST: Ron Robeits, Mayor June S. ~ City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF C.ALr~ORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TI~VIECULA) I l:tl~l~l~y CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the CiW~ Council of the City of Temecula a~a regular meeting thereof, held on the 22nd day of Febnmry, 1994, by the following vote of the City Council: COUNCrLMEMBERS: NOBS: COUNCrLMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCrL~: lune S. Greek, City Clerk Revenue ExpendINN Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures Transfers from (to) Other Funds Inoreaee (deerNee) in Fund Balenee Fund Balance. July 1, 1993 Fund Balance, June 80, 1994 12,g~0.146 $ 11.731~te~ 1.198,783 (1,1 is,me2) (.t2oe) s 4,3eL828 11.743,122 10~12,020 1.531.102 (1.lee.eel) 331.110 9,017.152 SCHEDULE A vAeuue~. FAVI(UNFAV) S (1.187.Q~4) 332.319 -Property Tax -Property Tax (Unseeumd) · Frenehbe Fees -Sales end Use Tax -Property Trensfer Tax -Tmnebnt Oemapeney Tax . -BtnmNmlFIreTex -Business Lioenses -Engineering: -BuScling -Planning -Fire Pin Cheek end InBp. 4nvestment Interest -Motor Vehicle in Lieu -Off Road Vehble In Lieu -Vehicle Code Fines -AB 2766 -Cepital Improvement Program -Community Sewices District -liedevelopment Agenay -Contributions -Grants -Overhead Reimbursement -Temporary Outdoor Event -Perking CiteSone ,Rental Income -Other TEETER PLAN ONE TIME ADJUST. 824,040 0 680,000 5.800,000 130.000 450,000 1,373.179 275,000 1,061,026 0 54,000 18.000 266~01 213,600 75,000 2O,OOO o 0 0 0 0 0 Gr.N""V' ~ REVENUE DETAIL BY FUND 80UFICE FYgG-e4 FYg~e4 YrD REVISED 12/31/83 PROJECTION ii&ii&&&ilil&&&&&&&& 293J47 40,71 237284 2,834 ,,132 75,9;1 211,439 0 45,675 131,1H 65,517 27.630 108,191 545,846 357 24,047 0 1,061,026 357 54,(XX) 18,000 213,600 0 12,753 5,010 2,000 0 106,800 0 0 12.753 297 5,010 2,000 66.443 11,743,122 SCHEDULE B FAVI(UNF'AV) 176423 40,795 0 68,000 0 0 (~,STSJT9) 0 0 0 0 0 ('~S.O00) 0 0 0 357 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,753 297 5,010 2,000 66,443 (1,187,024) ~., ab-e4 Capital Outlay Total Dep-b,idt 100 Personnel Services opemung Expendre.. Capital OutJay Total Department 110 Personnel Services Operating Expendhums Capital Outlay Personnel Services Operaling Expenditures Capital Outlay Total Department 130 Personnel Services Operating Expenditures Capital OuUay Total I:)cl::-b~mnt 140 Personrml Services Opm,aUn~ Expenditures Capital Outlay Total Departn, mm 150 GENERAL FUND EXPENDrTURE BUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT SCHEDULE C PAGE 1 BUDGET ~ 12/31/83 APR:IOPRIATION FAV/(UNFAV) 50,e23 35,550 60,561 (938) 234,007 93,914 253,382 (19,375) 0 0 0 0 209,630 129,473 313,043 (20,313) 350,76'/ 164,434 340,674 10,093 120,220 51,637' 100,597 19,623 2.400 0 2,400 0 473,387 216,071 443,671 29,716 0 0 0 0 390.029 lm:),841 402.237 (12,2o6) 0 0 0 0 225,000 187,367 312,c)cx) (8'/',0o0) 0 0 0 0 527,705 229,667 514,135 13,570 300,342 173, 171 315,344 (15,002) 0 0 0 0 828,047 402,838 829,479 (1,4,q2) 63,g15 34,609 76,603 (12.,688) 0 0 0 0 2o9.938 ,e.sse 22o.soe (lo,eeo) GENERALRND EXPENDITtJRE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT SCHEDULE C PAGE2 F'YI;3-O4 FYm-O4 FYm-O4 FY93-84 CURRENT YTD AMENDED ADjLJ$1MENT BUDGET {i 12/31/69 APPROPRIATION FAVI(UNFAV) 715, 1 g6 314,214 644, 182 71,004 380,824 163,933 321,822 38,g02 575 0 575 0 1,076,595 478,147 966,889 100,906 0 0 0 0 662,505 277,572 641,122 51,383 207, 106 88, 675 201,148 5,958 11,500 0 11,500 0 911,111 366,~47 853,770 57,341 0 0 0 0 4, 107,471 1,775,879 4, 103,971 3,500 0 0 3,500 (3,500) 4, 107,471 1,775,879 4, 107,471 0 0 0 0 0 1,855,165 62,646 481,986 1,373,179 3,500 0 3,500 0 0 0 0 0 86,000 80,000 86,000 0 0 0 0 0 Operaling ~ Capital Ouliey Total Department 191) TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE PUBLIC WORKS OPERATING TRANSFER OUT QENEFIALFUI~ EXPENDITURE BUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT SCHEDULE C PAGE 3 BUDGET O 12/31/93 APPROPRIATION FAV/(UNFAV) 0 0 0 0 450,000 0 340,000 110,000 94,955 19,gt g4,gS5 0 544,955 19,855 434,955 110,000 11.731,363 4,368,328 10,21 2,020 1,51 9,343 1 ,lgg,ggl2 58'/,496 1 ,lie, ill2 0 12,g81,355 4,g55,824 11,412,012 1,518,343 SCHEDULE A Revenue ExpendiNree Exoeu of Revenue Over ExpelxSbxe Tranefere from (to) Other Funds Inereue (deereue) in Fund Balance Fund Balene, July 1, 1993 Fund Balance. June 30, 1994 BUDGET FYg3-N AMENDED BUDGET FAVI(UNFAV) $ 567358 I 324.649 $ 576,899 $ 9,541 25.311 (24.802) S 18.446 509 25,311 S 509 S 25.311 -investment Interest · .G~s Tax 2106 ..Gas Tax 2105 ..Gas Tax 2107 -(3~s Tax 2107.5 -Fleimbursemen13 T rarmfer from General FundA..TF QA8 TAX FUND REVENUE DETNL BY FUND SOURCE SCHEDULE B 12/31/83 PROJECTION FAVI(UNF.AV) 0 4,105 4,496 4,496 0 74,822 136,166 136,186 0 g;,302 158,860 158,860 0 6,000 5,674 5,674 0 5,045 5,045 5,045 324,649 576,890 9,541 1,177.145 2,041,891 9,541 o=p~ ou~y Total Department 164 QASTAXR. JND EXPENDITURE BUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT BUDi3ET ~ 12/31/g3 APPROPRIATION FAVI(UNFAV) *,,~,etttt.e~,t,tt, ttt. ere ****tt. ee, H,eea~a~,.~el~e,e ,-.et,teee, lee,ee,.ie,,.e~e e,,.e,e,e,e~e, ee, eee, e, eelee, e 800,551 358,464 776,281 24,270 1,1 94,877 739,137 1,203,377 (8,500) 61,724 61,0g6 61,724 0 2,057'.152 1,158,6ti 2,041,382 15,770 8CI-IEDt,I.E A Increase (decrease) in Retained Earnings Retained Earnings. July 1. 1993 Retained E,,ming~. June 30. 1994 1g~,117 $ 104,809 19~.~63 146,862 (836) $ (las.~4e) (le,oes) FYg344 AMENDED BUDGET 198,176 19e,176 (185,24~) VARIANCE FAV/(tJNFAV) $ (N1) 1,777 836 $ 836 VEHICLE8 INTERNAL SERVICE FUND BUDGET BUMMARY 8C:t,,IEDI, R~A Revenue Increase (demise) in Petalned Earnings Retained Earnings, July 1, 1993 Petalned Earnings, June 30, 1994 I:Ygs-e4 FYgS-94 FYgG. N I:Yga. N CURRENT Y'rD AMENDED VARL~NCE BUDGET ~ 12/31/g~ BUDGET FAVI(UNFAV) loe.~61 $ 56.158 $ 110,461 $ 800 10~,561 48.966 110.461 7,170 INFORMATION SYSTEMS INTEFINAL 8EFMCE FUND BUDGET 8UMMArlY 8CHEDULEA Revenue Expensel Increase (decmile) in Retained Elmings Retained Earnings, July 1, lg93 Retained Esrnings, June 30. 1~4 F'YgO-04 I:Y93-04 FY93-94 FY9344 CURRENT YI'D AMENDED VAIllANCE BUDGET ~ 12/31/90 BUDGET FAV/(UNFAV) 364,026 $ 182.244 (1.2e6) $ 36,818 142,334 39,910 359,504 $ (4.522) 350,504 38.0e3 1,285 $ o8,oeo $ 1.2e6 COPY CENTER INTERNAL SERVICE FUND BUDGET SUMMARY 8CHEDUL.EA Revenue Expenses Irmreue (decrease) in Retained Earn~ Retained Earnings, July 1, 1903 Retained EaLmings, June 30, 1994 FYe3-N FYB3-e4 FYg3-B4 FYg~i..N CLRRENT YT'D AMENDED BUDGET i) 12/31/93 BUDGET FAVI(UNFAV) $ 119.014 $ 60,358 119,114 (loo) $ (2ez/4) $ 141.762 $ 22.748 141,762 46.9~2 100 $ 46,952 $ 100 FACIUTIE8 SCHEDULE A ~eve~ue Expenses Increase (decrease) in Retained Earnings Retained Earnings, July 1, 1993 Retained Earnings. June 30, 1994 476,297 $ 238.148 VARIANCE FAVI(tJNFAV) $ 481,717 $ 5,420 476,297 230,833 481,717 (5,420) S 7,515 -Charge For Services TOTAL FUND 300 -ira'cA t~e,~t Irltmtlt -Charge For 8ervi~ TOTAL FUND 310 -Investment Interest -Charges For Services TOTAL FUND 320 -Investment Interest -Charges For Services TOTAL FUND 330 -Investment Interest -Charges For Services TOTAL FUND 340 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL BY FUND 8OURCE SCHEDULE B FY93-94 FYg3-94 FYg3-N FYg3-94 CURRENT Yi'D REVISED ADJUSTMENT BUDGET t 12/31/93 PROJECTION FAVI(UNFAV) 0 5,249 5,249 5,249 199,117 99,560 182,g~7' (6.1g0) 199,117 104,809 198,176 . (941) 0 1,326 1,326 1,326 199,661 54,330 109, 135 (528} 109,861 56,156 110,481 800 0 232 500 500 354,026 182,012 359,004 (5,022) 354,026 182,244 359,504 (4,522) 0 848 848 848 119,014 59, 510 140,914 21 ,gO0 119,014 60,358 141,762 22,748 0 0 500 500 476.297 238,148 481,217 4,920 476,297 338,148 481,71 7 5,420 1,268,115 541,71 5 1,291,620 23,505 Depreciation Total Department 110 Depreciation ~tal Department 162 Operating Exper,:litures Depreciation Total Department 164 Operating Expendi. wes Depreciation Total Department 180 INTERNALSERVICEFUNDS EXPENDITURE B~MARY BYD~ARTME~ 8CHEDU. E C FYO3-N FYge-N FY93-04 FY93-64 CURRENT YTD AMENDED ADJUSTMENT BUDQET i) 12/31/63 APPROPRIATION FAV/(UNFAV) ****.et*tl/ll&ll&li,,l e~-,,,,,a+eee,,,,-,,akee,k,*e,-, .ett. e***t**.e***e**.e** 28,817 10,584 24,840 1 ,T/'7 173,336 136,378 173,336 0 0 0 0 0 196,953 146,962 166,176 1,777 3,865 1 ,g83 3,865 0 4,ees 2,2e6 5,ems (coo) 10,000 5, 158 10,000 0 24,024 12,014 24,1324 0 34,1324 17, 172 34,024 0 13,500 5,715 13,500 0 30,716 12,859 30,716 0 44,216 18,574 44,216 0 7,500 5,192 7,500 0 19,0H 5,782 19,0H 0 26,556 10,974 26,556 0 Total DqwS'ne~ 1 ge Perlonnel ~ Oper~ng ExpendiNre~ c..,p~ ou,ey Total Deparlment 1 ~ INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS EXPENDITtJI:IE BUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT SCHEDULE C Ez~e2 BUDGET ; 12/31/13 APPROPRIATION FAV/(UNFAV) 63,680 28,474 59,195 4,487 301,61 1 115,860 300,311 1,300 0 0 0 0 365,291 142,334 359,504 5,787 29,841 11 ,gO3. :29,740 101 89,2'/3 76,729 112,022 (22,749) 0 0 0 0 119,114 88,832 141,782 (22,648) ./.. :! ;.: . ::. Personnel 8m'vices 55,873 20,000 51,217 4,686 Operating Expenditures 420,424 210,633 430,500 '4-0/6) Capita~ O~ey 0 0 0 0 Total Department 1 It 476,297 230,r~__ 48~,717 (s,420) 1,270,316 657,547 1,291,620 (21,304) Revenue Expenditures Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance Fund Balm, July 1, 1993 Fund Balance, June 30, 1994 CITY OF TEMECULA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT BUDGE SUMMARY FY 93-94 FY 93-94 BUDGET @ 12/31/93 $ 147,278 $ 118,968 118,968 (118,968) $ 28,31 0 (817,'~) EXHIBIT I Page I Revenue Operating Transfers Out Increase (decrease) in Fund Balm Fund Balance, July 1, 1993 Fund Balance, June 30, 1994 $ $ CITY OF TEMECULA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS DEVELOPMENT IMPACT BUDGET SUMMARY FY 93.94 BUDGET 3,456,857 7,003,581 (3,546,724) $ 6,522,459 2,975,735 FY 93-94 12/31/93 ,851,81 9 225,000 ,626,819 Revenue Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures Operating Transfers Out Increase (decrease) in Fund Balm Fund Balance, July 1, 1993 Fund Balance, June 30, 1994 Revenue Operating Transfers Out Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance Fund Balance, July 1, 1993 Fund Balm, June 30, 1994 CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT I SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Page 2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT BUDGET SUMMARY R93-N BUDGET 1~,261 ~,~1 1~,460 1~,460 (19,365) 118,095 12/31/93 4,665 4,665 CITY OF TEMECULA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS MEASURE 'A' BUDGET SUMMARY BUDGET @ 12/31/93 $ 668,129 $ 273,078 33,129 $ 273,078 $ 878,185 CITY OF TEMECULA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS LOCAL TRANSPORTATION BUDGET SUMMARY EXHIBIT I Page 3 Revenue Operating Transfers Out Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance Fund Balance, July 1, 1993 Fund Balance, June 30, 1994 FY 93-94 FY 93-94 BUDGET @ 12/31/93 $ 42,800 $ 25,678 314,000 265,000 (~7~,~00) $ (239,3~) 502,711 $ 231,51 1 CITY OF TEMECULA CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND BUDGET SUMMARY EXHIBIT II Revenue Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures Operating Transfers In Increase (decrease) in Fund Balm Fund Balance, July 1,1993 Fund Balance, June 30, 1994 FY 9394 FY 9394 BUDGET @ 12/31/93 $ 1,527,200 $ 601,573 10,61 5,098 4,320,087 (9,087,898) (3,718,514) (280,929) $ (3,493,514) 322,488 $ 8,848,528 P~RS0NN~-T ,_,A~ -I~OC~TIoN Ry DEPAR~,NT (~ull T,,-e l~luivakuts ~ EXHIBIT Page 1 Mid Year ~ Adjusted 1993-94 1993-94 1993-94 Deltauncut Total 5.00 0.00 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 c~y Senior Management Analyst Exec~ve Am~m-mt Adminisw~ve Secretary Human Resomx:~ Admlni,m.alor personne~ s~ Department Total DesCent: CrfY _c~-m~K IZk~manmmU Total 1.~ 0.~ 1.~ 1.~ 0.~ 1.~ 1.50 0.~ 1.~ 2.~ 0.~ 9.~ 5.50 0.00 5.50 PF R QNN T . T ,T. .CATTON ~u11 T~me ]~!utvale~ts ]Lr~!, EXHIBIT III Page 2 DEPA RT NT I MidYear Am~xF-ed Adjusted 1993-94 1993-94 1993-94 Finance Officer Chi~ Accounmm Fmaucial Services Admlnimtqlior SeuiorAx:couumai Adminimtmtive Jlx:r,~y Accouuting Speci,,.~ Accounting A-,..misT,,nt 1.~ 0.~ 1.~ 1.~ 0.~ 1.~ 0.~ 0.~ 0.~ 1.~ 0.~ 1.~ 0.~ 0.~ 0.~ 3.00 0.00 3.00 2.50 0.00 2.50 10.00 0.00 10.00 ~ of Planning Senior Planner Associate Planner Assistant Planner Planning Technician Administrative Secretary Office Specialist Office A.e. si,~nt 1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 ~.~ 1.~ 2.00 ~.~ 1.60 2.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Department Total 13.00 (0.60) 12.40 Detainment: BUTT-nING AND S~ Chief Building Official Senior Building tnspeaor nwdiding In_npector II Code Enforcement Officer Building Xn_~inaor I Building Technician AdminiSnltive Secrellty Office Assistant DepartmentT~ 11.00 0.00 11.00 PF RSONNISI ,ALx OCb T ON ny DF, PARTMI NT (Full Time Bquivalems listed, Continued) EXHIBIT III PaSe 3 Mid Year Authorized Adjusted 1993-94 1993-94 1993-94 City Bngineer/Dimaor of Public Works Principal ~ineer Pemit ~aL, ineer Associate ~qZineer Senior Public Works InSpector Assistant nngineer Public Works In~i~*ctor Adminim'rative Secxetary Offi~ Ae. sistnnt ~mxt Tom1 PUBLIC WORKS 0.50 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.50 1.50 12.50 0.00 12.50 City r~glneer/Director of Public Works Traffic Bngineer Maintenance Superintendent Senior Public Works Inspector Public Works Inspector Traffic Technician Lead Mainte~nce Worker Admlni~trafive ~ Yninten*nce Worker Office A~istant 0.50 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.50 2.00 1.50 14.50 0.00 14.50 Pt~R~oNl~w. AJ J QCATwON EXHIBIT III Page ev D. EPARTM~.NT .... INTRQNAT. Sla~VICB FtYNDS INSURANCE Finsncisl Services Admini.,unsmr Adminl,m,ative ~y INFORMATIONS SY~ Information Systems aAdminisu'ratOr COPY CENTER Admini.,mltjve Technician FACII-TITR~ MidYear Authorized Adjust~ 1993-94 1993-94 1993-94 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.25 Maimchance Worker Custodian Total lntetml Service Funds Bml~¢!:~ O~ AGRNCY PLANNING 4.50 0.00 4.50 Senior Planner Associate Planner 0.~ 0.~ 0.~ 0.~ 0.~ 0.~ EXHIBIT III Page 5 PERSONN~,~]~,f~cAT~ON BY DFPARTI~NT Authorized 1993-94 CCiIMUNITY S!~RVICllS MidYear ]Vrsinte, m~_ Supc- ;,,t(--Itmt Recreation Supendsor Admininnalive ,~Cxv..lky Maiu~ Worker Vo~ CooMinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 ?.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 ?.00 Department Total SHRVICE LEVEL A 14.00 14.00 T ~ndSCape l:kiaftmeut Total IX'eartm~t: SHRVICB T.TZVI:n. B O.45 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.45 Office Assistant Department ToUd Dep~rtment: SERVICB T_T~/~T. C 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Mamgcmcat AssL, mmt T-,,,dsc~ Impmot Total 1.00 0.55 1 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.55 Toud co~mu~ services13.11lo.o~~ EXHIBITIll Page 6 Mid Year 1993-94 1993-94 1993-94 G'I~q]:II~A]'o l:rU]qT~ City Council 5.00 0.00 5.00 City Manager 5.00 0.00 5.00 Human Resomr. es 3.00 0.00 3.00 City Clzrk 5.50 0.00 5.50 Finance 10.00 0.00 10.00 PlanninZ 13.00 (0.60) 12.40 P-,,fldinz and Safety 11.00 0.00 11.00 ~gineednZ 12.50 0.00 12.50 GAS TAX Public Works 14.50 0.00 14.50 flq'Im~NAL SPm~VIC~- PUNnS Insurance 0.50 0.00 0.50 Infonnation Services 1.00 0.00 1.00 Copy C~nter 1.00 0.00 1.00 Facilities 2.00 0.00 2.00 RRT~]~'V~ DPiVIRNT AGRNCY Planning 0.00 0.60 0.60 COMM'UN1TY S~RVICu:t~ Community Services 14.00 0.00 14.00 Service Level A 0.45 0.00 0.45 Service Level B 1.00 0.00 1.00 Service Level C 1.55 0.00 1.55 TOTAL AEYlI-IO:RY73~n POSITIONS 101.00 ITEM NO. 7 ~ PPROVI~ T. CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer DATE: February 22, 1994 SUBJECT: Property Insurance Renewal PREPARED BY: Luci Romero, Financial Services Administrator RECOMMENDATION: Approve the renewal of the City's property insurance coverage with Aetna Insurance Company in an amount not to exceed $30,000, annual premium. DISCUSSION: The City's current property insurance policy is provided by Aetna Insurance Company. The policy coverage includes various insured locations (including earthquake coverage), valuable papers, and electronic data processing equipment. In addition to the proposal from Aetna, proposals were also received from: 1 ) Golden Eagle; 2) American States; 3) Deans & Homer; 4) California Insurance Group; 5) Mercury Casualty; 6) Fireman's Fund; and 7) Swett & Crawford. Due to the current moratorium on new earthquake coverage, ell of the carriers were unable to provide earthquake coverage for the City's insured locations. The most significant change in the policy renewal is the inclusion of the new Community Recreation Center (CRC). The addition of the CRC to the insured locations on the policy increases the premium approximately 400%. The proposal submitted by Aetna continues to provide the necessary coverage. Thus, staff recommends renewal of the policy with Aetna Insurance Company in an annual premium amount not to exceed $30,000. The premium amount has not been finalized to date, however, the City's insurance broker has indicated that the amount will be well within the not to exceed limit. FISCAL IMPACT: The premium will be paid in semi-annual payments. Adequate funds for the payment of the installment which is due in the current fiscal year, have been appropriated in the Insurance Internal Service Fund. ITEM NO. 8 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT APPROVAL City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning February 22, 1994 French Valley Airport Master Plan Update Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File BACKGROUND The following is a chronology of the French Valley Airport Master Plan: The Phase I Report (Chapters 1-3) was sent to Staff .on July 13, 1993. This report included information regarding inventory, forecasts and facility requirements for the Airport. Staff attended a meeting on July 30, 1993, which at that time discussed the Phase I Report. Comments on the Phase I Report were sent to the consultant on September 14, 1993 (see attachment). II. The Phase 2 Report (Chapter 4) was received by Staff on October 14, 1993. This report contained six development alternatives. Staff attended a meeting on October 21,1993, at which time, the Phase 2 Report was discussed. Comments on the Phase 2 Report were sent ot the consultant on November 22, 1993 (see attachment). III. An Addendum to the Phase 2 Report was received by Staff on January 28, 1994. This report expanded the previous development alternatives discussed in the original Phase 2 Report. Four .alternatives were analyzed, with the focus on existing and future impacts to land use, safety and noise. The consultant has recommended an alternative that includes a 6,000 foot long runway, with a 3,400' parallel runway to the east. A meeting to discuss the Addendum was held on February 4, 1994. Staff attended the meeting. The consultant for the project estimates that the Draft Environmental Impact Report and a Final draft Comprehensive Land Use Plan will be available for review in March 1994. The Plan will ultimately go before the Board of Supervisors and needs to be aiDproved by the Federal Aviation Administration. Please see me if you would like to see copies of the above referenced Reports, or if you have any questions. R:~T~CI. IVLY.CC 2/~94 kib 1 Attachments: 1. Letter Dated September 14, 1993 - Page 3 2. Letter Dated November 22, 1993 - Page 4 it:~TA~CIt'VLy.CC 2/0/~S klb 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 LETTER DATED SEPTEMBER 14, 1993 City of Temecula 19 43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590 September 14, 1993 (909} 694-1989 · FAX 1909) 694-199c. Mr: James M. Harris, P.E. Coffrnan Associates, Inc. 11022 N. 28th Drive, Suite 240 Phoenix, AZ 85029 SUBJECT: City of Temecu la Planning Department Comments for French Valley Airport Master Plan Phase 1 Report Dear Mr. Harris: The City of Temecula Planning DeparUnent has reviewed the above referenced Report and often the following comments for your consideration: Exhibit 1H - Historical and Forecast Population: This exhibit should include population forecasts for the City of Temecula. Based upon estimates contained in the City' s Draft General Plan, the population within the City of Teme~ula is projected to be 62,300 by the year 2,000 and 87,800 by the year 2010. Population forec~Ets for the City' s northern Sphere of Influence Area, where the airport is to be located, is projected to be 34,200 by the year 2000 and 67,500 by the year 2010. Please incorporate these population forecasts into Exhibit 1H and utilize these forecasts in your analysis. Exhibit 1L - Gene~liTcd Existing Land Uses: The following uses should be included on this exhibit: The Temecula Valley Unified School District high school site, located north and west of Winchester Road, and south and east of the Santa Gertrudis Creek, near the intersection of Nicolas and Winchester Roads (refer to the City's Draft Preferred Land Use Plan for the approximate locate of this site). b. The site of the Rivcnon Lane Park (see attached map for approximate location). Cs The school sites identified in the Silverhawk Specific Plan; Planning Areas No. 5 and 8 have been identified as potential sites (see attached map for approximate location). R:'~FAGANM%FRNCHVLY%FVAMI~HI.COM 9114/93 Mr. Harris French Valley Airport Page 2 The existing sensitive noise receptors (including churches) and those which will be developed during the plan should be identified. Figure 84 of the City of Temecula Draft General Plan has is included as an attachment and identifies sensitive rec~tor locations within proximity to the airport. Page 2-17 states that the avenge distances to all major air carrier airports is 100 miles; this information is incorrect. Actual mad distances to the nearby commercial airports are as follows: 58 miles to San Diego International Airport, 60 miles to Ontario International Airport, 64 miles to John Wayne Airport (Orange County), and 100 miles to Los Angeles International Airport. Titis will have an effect on the travel patterns and demands for commuter service at French Valley Airport. Table 3A on Page 3-6. Why is column included for Class D aircraft in the table? The table states that Class C aircraft have a gross weight between 12,500 pounds and 300,000 pounds. What is the gross weight for Class D aircraft? Please expand the information contained within this table for clarity. Table 3C on Page 3-9 contains information which needs to be further explained in the report. The analysis of larger aircraft with sixty and ninety percent useful loads is not clearly discussed in the report. In addition, if the analysis which is provided is being used to justify the expansion of the runway, then the runway should be expanded to the north, away from population concentrations. Exhibk 3B - Airside Facility Requirements is unclear. Please explain why short term and ultimate airport facilities the same. In addition, please include the source of the information contained in the matrix. Exhibk 3C - Landside Facility Eequirements states that there is one (1) existing commuter tie down at the airport. Is this information correct? Please verify the number of existing commuter tie downs at the airport. Projected airport needs should be ascer~nined from existing businesses/industries within the airport vicinity. Growth patterns for these businesses/industries, as wen as their aircraft/flight needs will provide valuable information in terms of the role of the future airport needs. A copy of the City of Temecula Draft Preferred Land Use Plan is enclosed for your reference. Although this plan has not been adopted, it can be used as a guide for further analysis regarding the Airport Master Plan and its impact on the surrounding area. R:~FAGANM~FRNCHVLY~FVAMPPHI.COM 9/14/93 tjs Mr. Harris French Vnlley Airport Page 3 The City of Temecula Planning Department appreciates the opportunity to comment on Phase 11Lepon for the French Valley Airport Master Plan and looks forward to reviewing future documents relative to this project. We are available to offer any assistance and information that you would require concerning the areas surrounding the French Valley Airport. Should you have any questions, please contact Matthew Fagan at (909) 694-6400. R:\FAGANI~FRNCHVLY'xFVAMPPHI.COM 9/14/93 tjs ATTACHMENT NO. 2 LETTER DATED NOVEMBER 22, 1993 R:Wf~CHVLY.CC 2/N9~ lab 4 City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590 (909) 694--1989 · FAX [909) 694--1999 November 22, 1993 Mr. James M. Hart'is, P.E. Coffman Associates, Inc. 11022 N. 28th Drive, Suite 240 Phoenix, AZ 85029 SUBJECT: Comments for French Valley Airport Master Plan Phase 2 Report Thank you for the opportunity to review the Phase 2 Report for the French Valley Airport Facility Master Plan. The French Valley Airport is within the future urban service area (Sphere of Influence) for the City of Temecuh as defined by the Local Agency Formation Commi,~sion, and is included in the Planning Area for the City General Plan. The City of Temecuh is concerned about noise and safety impacts from the facility on the current and future residents in the French Valley and Nicolas Valley areas. Should the rimway be extended, the City of Temecuh would prefer that any future extensions be done to the north, away from the existing urb~niTed areas. This would help to reduce any future noise impacts from an expanded facility. In addition, the alternatives presented in the Phase 2 Report do not appear to integrate the airside and landside facilities. The alternatives in the Report should integrate these facilities into complete alternatives to enable a meaningful analysis. This integration of the ainide and landside facilities is especis~y important if the provision of commercial air service is a component of the preferred alternative. Thank you again for the opportunity to review the Phase 2 Report. If you have any questions regarding our concerns, or it we can be of assistance in preparing the Master or Land Use Plans, please contact Matthew Fagan at (909) 694-6400. Sincerely, Gary Thornhill Dir~tor of Planning cc: Judy Ross, Aviation Division R:~FRNCh'VLY.AffilPHA,~EI.LTR 11/22/93 tin ITEM NO. 9 APPROVAl CITY ATTORNL~f_~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer February 22, 1994 Acceptance of an Offer of Dedication - Portions of Campanula Way and Acceptance Into the City-Maintained Storm Drain System - Storm Drain Facilities within Portions of Campanula Way PREPARED BY: Jim D. Fsul, Assistant Engineer - Land Development RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt s resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE OFFER OF DEDICATION OF, PORTIONS OF CAMPANULA WAY AND ACCEPTING STORM DRAIN FACILITIES WITHIN PORTIONS OF CAMPANULA WAY' INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM BACKGROUND: On January 25, 1994, the City Council of the City of Temecula spproved an Offer of Dedication for the realignment of Campanula Way. On February 8, 1994, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved an acceptance of an Offer of Dedication and an acceptance into the City-maintained street system of a portion of the realigned Campanula Way. Kemper Real Estate Development Company (KRDC) also has improved, to City standards, storm drain facilities within Campanule Way to provide drainage to the Palores Del Sol Park Site. KRDC, Inc. has constructed these drainage facilities as a condition of the Development Agreement for Paloma Del Sol. These facilities are located in a portion of Campanula Way not previously accepted by the City. PwOb'~Ndq~t%94%O222~mpwey.eep FISCAL IMPACT: Sufficient funds are available in Public Works Drainage Facilities Maintenance Account No. 100-164-999-5401. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 94- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive. pwO~gdrpt~i~O~wm/.eap RESOLUTION NO. 94- A ~LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECUIA, CALIFORNIA, ACt3aq~NG TI~OFFER OFDI~DICATION OF PORTIONS OF CAMPANULA WAY AND ACui~ItNG STORM DRAIN FACn~rrlES WItHIll A PORTION OF CAMPANULA WAY INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Wlfl;IREAS, Kernper Real Estate Development Company (KRDC) has offered for dedication to the City, Campanula Way, and the Offer of Dedication has been recorded as Instrument No. Campnnula Way, the legal description of which is set forth in Exhibit *A" and is depicted in Exhibit 'B". WHimRAS, the City desires to accept the Offer of Dedication for those portions of Campanula Way as depicted in Exhibit "B"; WH~:REAS, the City desires to accept into the City-maintained storm drain system the improved storm drain facilities with portions of Campanula Way as depicted in Exhibit "B" ; NOW, THERRFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. That the City of Temecula accepts the Offer of Dedication for those portions of Campanula Way described in Exhibits "A" and "B" aUached haeW. Section 2. That the City of Temecula accept into the City-maintained store drain system those storm drain facilities within portions of Campanula Way described in Exhibits "A" and "B' attached hereto. Section 3. The City Clerk shall c6firy the adoption of this resolution and accept the Offer of Dedication for the property desaibed in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached herere. PASSED, APPROVEB, AND ADOFrED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 22rid day of February, 1994. Ron Robeits, Mayor pwO6~gdqm94%O222~mwnpway.map A~T: June S. Greek city STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 94- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of February, 1994, by the following COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMB~: COUNCH,MEMBERS: COUNCH-,MEMBERS: vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: pwOS~egdrpt%94%O222%oempwey.,,q~ EXHIBIT "A' TO RESOLUTION NO. 94- Accepting the Offer of Dedication and accepting into the City- maintained storm drain system, storm drain facilities within portions of Campanula Way. (Legal description attached) ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAH FROST AND ASSOCIATES 28765 Single Oak Drive Temecul a, Ca1 t fornt a 92590 EX!IIBIT "A" lEGAl DESCRIIr[ION RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR CAMPANULA WAY ACCESS TO PARK SITE 3anuary 24, 1994 ON 400488-M4 Page I of 3 Those certain parcels of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being those portions of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 23432 filed in Book 159, Pages 38 through 6] of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County, described as follows: "- DARCFL 1 (Stret Rtuht-of-ia'v) CG:..:"CING at the intersection of the centerline of Meadows Parkway with cente~./ne of Campanula Way as shown on said parcel map, said inters hereinaf~. being referred to as Point "A"; Thence along s.,_4 centerline of Campanula Way South 54'00'00" W~ to the beginning _~ a tangent curve concave herly and h. lOOO.OO feet; - -, e~ter Thence along said curve -.Isterly 691.21 f 39'36'12"; 23.00 feet a radius of a central angle of Thence tangent from said of a tangent curve ~rth 86'23'48 .asterly feet to the beginning of 1000.00 feet; Thence along .51 46'12'35" to h a central angle of Thence continuim angle of 7'36'13" 132 '1 feet through a central Thence tangent from curve North 5'00' West 64 to a point on a curve in the sou* y line of De Road (]00.00 as shown on said parce , said curve being concave northwesterly and a radius of 1250.00 a radial line of said curve from said ~t bears North 32 West, said point being hereinafter referred to as Po* 'B"; Thl ong said curve and southeasterly line northeasterly 71.72 feet angle of 3'17'15"; Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates Right-of-Way for Campanula Way Access to Park Site January 24, 1994 3N 400488-M4 Page 2 of 3 · non-tangent froe said curve South 10'46'23" West 31.58 line para d/or concentric with and 50.00 feet northerly and y from the afore d line running between id Point "A" B"; para · no~e1 the following courses: South 32'35'00" East to a tangent curve concave northeasterly and of Thence along said 7'36'13"; through a central angle of Thence leavi South 4 parallel concentric line, West 50.00 to the TRUE POllIT OF BEGINNING. said curve 0.228 Acres, more or less. PARCEL 2 (Drainage) BEGINNING at Point "B" as hereinbefore described in Parcel 1, said point being on a curve in the southeasterly line of De Portola Road (100.00 feet wide) as shown on said parcel map, said curve being concave northwesterly and having a radius of 1250.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears North 32'35'00' West; Thence along said curve and southeasterly line southwesterly 71.72 feet through a central angle of 3'17'15"; Thence non-tangent from said curve South 75'56'23" East 31.58 feet to a line parallel and/or concentric with and 50.00 feet southerly and southwesterly from the aforedescribed line running from Point "A" to Point "B" as hereinbefore described in Parcel 1; Thence North 57'25'00" East 50.00 feet to said line running from Point "A" to Point "B"; Thence along said line North 32'35'00" West 20.91 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 0.030 Acres, more or less. PARCEL 3 (Drainage) A strip of land 30.00 feet*wide, the centerline of which is described as follows: COIeiENCING at Point'B" as hereinbefore described in Parcel 1; Robert Bern, Utlliam Frost & Associates Right-of-liay for Campanula liay Access to Park Site January 24, 1994 JN 400488-H4 Page 3 of 3 Thence along the aforedescribed 11ne running from Point "A" to Point "B" heretnbefore described tn Parcel ] South 32'35'00" East 64.4] feet to the beginning .of a tangent curve tn said line concave northeasterly and having radius of ]000.00 feet; Thence along said curve southeasterly 89.91 feet through a central angle of 5'09'05" to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence radially from said curve South 52']5'55" llest 25.00 feet to the POTlIT OF TERNINATZON, Said strip of land shall be lengthened or shortened northeasterly so as to terminate tn said line running from Point "A'to Point "B". CONTAZNZNG: 0.017 Acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO all covenants, rights, rights-of-way and easements of record. EXHZBZT "B" attached and by this reference made a part hereof. ~%~CEL e~.~ Lawrence L. Bacon, L.S. 3527 L.S. 3527 ~p. 6 - 30 - 96 * POL, 4 PARCEL MAP PARCEL NO. 23452 159 / 38-61 SHEET PCL. 4 PARCEL ~,~' PC'L. I PCL. 5 23432 MAP NO. 159 I 38-61 PCL. .. PCL. ' Y 51 NIt//WAY EXHIBIT "B" sKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION CAMPAAIU/A WAY ACCESS T~ PIIRKSlT~: S#ET I ~F ~ Stl:-Lrr5 dAt~. Z4,/~4~4L J.N. 4oo4ee,.M4 EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 94- SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE - STORM DRAIN FACILITIES WITHIN PORTIONS OF CAMPANULA WAY (Vicinity Map Attached) ITEM NO. 10 ~PPROV~T. CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council David F. Dixon City Manager February 22, 1994 Booking Fees PREPARED BY: City Clerk June S. Greek RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor to execute the appropriate documents to resolve the booking fees question pursuant to SB 2557. BACKGROUND: Staff will finelize a staff report on this item end forward it to you under separBte cover. Swj 'APPROVAL CITY-ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER ~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA A GENDA REPORT City Council David F. Dixon February 22, 1994 Booking Fees Pursuant to SB 2557 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign appropriate documents relative to the settlement of the booking fee issue. STAFF REPORT: Senate Bill 2557 was signed by the Governor on or about July 1, 1990. It provided the County with authority to charge fees for booking prisoners into the county jail by police officers of the City. The County adopted Resolution 650, Ordinance 702 effective March 21, 1991 which provided for criminal justice administrative fees (booking fees) to be retroactive to July 1, 1990. The County then proceeded to send invoices to various cities in the county and has continued that process through December 1993. A number of cities in the county filed suit against the County for relief of the aforementioned booking fees, especially retroactivity of these booking ? fees. The City of Temecula did not join the lawsuit but we have been asked to be a party to the settlement agreement so that the County can be assured that the issue of booking fees with all of the cities in the county is resolved once and for all. You will recall that the County notified the City of Temecula that if the booking fee issue was not resolved during fiscal year 1993-1994 they would cease to provide contract services to the City of Temecula for police protection. The County's position at the time of the notification was that they would settle the booking fee issue and continue to provide public safety services (i.e. Sheriff service). If the City of Temecula would agree to pay booking fees from March 1993 through fiscal year 1993-1994 and continue paying booking fees as long as their ordinance was in effect. Over the past several months we have been meeting to resolve the issue and in our AGENDA REPORT: February 17, 1994 Page 2 BOOK~NG FEES recent discussions we have come to a resolution of the booking fees. This resolution was brought about collectively with the majority of the cities in the county working as a cohesive group and bringing forth a solution to the problem. Therefore, the resolution for the City of Temecula and other contract cities is that we will only be obligated for booking fees from September 1993 through this fiscal year and through the coming years pursuant to the County's Ordinance 702. It is anticipated that we will have booking fees of approximately $10,000 per month and for fiscal 1993-1994 it will total approximately $100,000. Booking Fees will continue as long as the County's Ordinance 702 is in effect. Also, the County has received a credit for past retirement payments and a credit of more than $222,000 will be coming to the City. Therefore, we will have a positive in this transaction of more than $122,000. The final ~ettlement documents have not yet been prepared but I would recommend that the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign the appropriate documents once they have been reviewed by the City Attorney. ITEM NO. I I ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ~A ADOPTING PORTIONS OF THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN, AMENDING ~ OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR THE CITY OF TIEMECUIA, AND AMENDING CITY ORDINANCES 90-04, 92-16, AND 93-12 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEIVlECULA DOES I-~REBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. The Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. The City Council adopted the General Plan on November 9, 1993. B. The maintenance and protection of historic Old Town Temecula is an important issue and concern to the citizens of Temecuh. C. The General Plan for the City of Temecula calls for the preparation of a Specific Plan for Old Town Temecuh. D. The Specific Plan for the Old Town will establish regulations and programs to address the land use, architectural design, economic development, business revitalization, and historic preservation issues in and around Old Town. E. The Planning Commission has determined that the Old Town Specific Plan is consistent with the General Plan for the City of Temecuh. F. The City Council approved and adopted the Old Town Specific Phn on October 26, 1993. G. The Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance 578 which provided for the protection of historic resources and the creation of Historic Preservation Districts on October 23, 1979. H. The Board of Supervisors designated portions of Old Town Temecula as a Historic Preservation Districts on October 14, 1980. I. The City Council adopted Ordinance 90-04, which adopted by reference Riverside County Ordinance No. 578, which the Council has subsequenfiy amended through various City Ordinances. 5~rds\94-05 I J. The City Council expanded the boundary of Historic District on November 12, 1991 to include all the areas which are currently covered by the Old Town Specific Plan. K. The City Council adopted Ordinance 92-16 providing standards for temporary signs in commercial and service districts on October 16, 1992. Ordinance 92-16 was amended by Ordinance 93-16 on June 8, 1993. L. To ensure compatibility with and consistency between the various City Ordinances and the Old Town Specific Plan it will be necessary to repeal or amend some of these M. The Planning Commission approved the Plan and recommended that it be adopted by the City Council on June 7, 1993. N. The notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, County Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecuh Valley Chamber of Commerce. O. A 'public hearing was conducted on February 8, 1994, at which time interested persons has an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition. P. The Negative Declaration for the Old Town Specific Plan was certified by the City Council on February 8, 1994. Section 2. The Land Use and Development Standards conutined in Section HI of Attachment 1, the Old Town Specific Plan, are hereby adopted as the Development Standards for this Specific Plan (SP) Zone pursuant to Section 17.28 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348, as adopted by reference pursuant to City Ordinance 90-04. Section 3. The Official Zoning Map for the City of Temecula is hereby amended to change the Zoning Districts within the boundary of the Specific Plan as shown on Exhibit 2 of Specific Plan, from C-1 (General Commercial), C-P (Restricted Commercial), C-P-S (Scenic Highway Commercial), M-SC (Manufacturing-Service Commercial), R-1 (One Family Dwellings), R-2 (Multiple Family Dwellings), R-3 (General Residential), R-R (Rural Residential), and W-1 (Watercourse, Watershed & Conservation Areas), to "SP Specific Plan*. Section 4. Section 15 of Ordinance No. 90-04 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Ordinance Nos. 575, 576, 577, 579, 580 and 581, are hereby adopted by reference." Section 5. Subsection z. of Section 19.2. of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348, which was adopted by City Ordinance 92-16 is hereby amended to read as follows: "z. "Temporary Sign Event" means any number of consecutive days, up to thirty (30), for the display of any promotional sign." 5~-ds~94-05 2 Section 6. Subsection co. of Section 19.2. of Article XIX of Ordinance No. which was adopted by City Ordinance 92-16 is hereby mended to r~a__d as follows: ~g8, "ec. "Historic Old Town Temecula" means all the land use districts within the Old Town Specific Plan, except for the Highway Tourist Commercial and Community Commercial Districts. ' Section 7. Subsection C.2. of Section 19.10. of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348, which was adopted by City Ordinance 92-16, and amended by City Ordinance 93-12, is hereby amended as follows: "2. Portable signs, including but not limited to animals, human beings, A- Frames, T-Frames, and those of a similar nature located on private property, except as pennitu~ by the Old Town Specific Plan." Section 8. Subsection C.9. of Section 19.10. of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348, which was adopted by City Ordinance 92-16 is hereby repealed. Section 9. Subsection d of Section 19.10 of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348, which was adopted by City Ordinance 92-16 is hereby amended to read as follows: "D. Promotional Signs in Historic Old Town Temecula. Promotional signs in Historic Old Town Temecula are permitted in the Community Commercial, Tourist Retail Core, Community Commercial & Tourist Support, and with appmved commercial uses in the Tourist Serving Residential Districts and shall comply with the requirements of the Old Town Specific Plan. Window signs which are consistent with the provisions of the Old Town Specific Plan do not require a permit." Section 10. The introductory paragraph of Subsection E. of Section 19.10. of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348, which was adopted by City Ordinance 92-16 is hereby amended to read as follows: "E. Grand Opening and Interim Signs in Historic Old Town Temecula. Grand opening and interim signs in Historic Old Town Temecula are permitted in the Community Commercial, Tourist Retail Core, Community Commereial/Tourist Support Districts, with approved commercial uses in the Tourist Serving Residential District, and shall comply with the requirements listed below:" Section 11. F. nvironmental Compliance. An Initial Environmental Study was prepared for this project. The Initial Environmental Study determined that no additional impacts beyond those impacts identified in the Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan. Therefore, a Negative Declaration is hereby certified for this project. Section 12, P. ffec~ve Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this Ordinance to be pested in three designated pesting places. 5Xotds\94-05 3 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADO~, this day, the 22nd day of February, 1994. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] 5Xordm~94-05 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERS~E) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, I-IF~RF. Ry DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance No. 94-05 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 8th day of February, 1994, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 22nd day of February, 1994, by the following roll call vote: AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCH.,MEMBERS: None ABSTAINED: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz, Stone June S. Greek, City Clerk 5\ords\94-05 5 · ITEM NO. 12 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ',~, FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planningy~' February 22, 1994 An Amendment to Section 18.28.A.C.(10)of Ordinance No. 348 Pertaining to the Type of Paving Material Required for Access to Second Dwelling Units Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council: Read by title only and introduce an Ordinance entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION NO. 18.28.A.C.(10)OF ORDINANCE NO. 348 PERTAINING TO THE TYPE OF PAVING MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR ACCESS TO SECOND DWELLING UNITS" BACKGROUND The City Council, at their January 11, 1994 meeting directed the Planning Commission to consider an Amendment to Section No. 18.28.A.C(10)of Ordinance No. '348 - a requirement for all-weather access for emergency vehicles to any second unit placed more than 150 feet form a public right-of-way. This ordinance amendment would allow staff to exercise some "flexibility" to the existing requirements. The Planning Commission approved an Amendment to Section No. 18.28.A.C(10) of Ordinance No. 348 at their February 8, 1994 meeting by a 4-1 vote (Commissioner Hoagland voted in opposition to the Amendment). They recommended language in the Ordinance Amendment that would require the applicant to maintain the roadway. In addition, they recommended that the waiver be executed prior to the issuance of building permits. This language has been included in the Ordinance Amendment contained within this report (reference Attachment No. 1 ). FISCAL IMPACT None. R:\STAFFRPT\PAVE-0RD.CC 21141~ ktb 1 Attachments: Ordinance No. 94- - Page 3 Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 7 Draft Planning Commission Minutes - Page 8 R:\STAFFRPT\PAVE-ORD.CC 2/16/9~ ktb 2 A'I'I'ACHMENT NO. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 94- R:\STAFFRPT\PAVE-0RD.CC 2114194 ktb 3 ATrACHIVInNT NO. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 94- AN ORDINANCE OF TRY~ C1TY COUNCIL OF CITY OF TI~!ECULA, ~ING SECTION NO. 18.28.A.C.(10) OF ORDINANCE NO. 348 PERTAINING TO ~ TYPE OF PAVING MATERIAL REQUIIH~D FOR ACCESS TO SECOND DVtrl~JJJ~Cv UN]'r8 CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIH)RNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. City Oulinance No. 90-04 adopted by reference certain portions of the Non- Codified Riverside County Ordinances, including Ordinance No. 348. Section 18.28.a.c.(10) of Ordinance No. 348 is hereby amended to read as follows: "(10) Any second unit placed more than 1S0 feet from a public right-of-way sh~ll be required to provide all-weather access for emergency vehicles from a publicly maintained wad. Asphaltic or concrete paving is required for all-weather access; however, this requirement may be waived ff all of the following conditions are met: A soils report (prepared by a licensed son or civil engheer) is submiUed to the Depar~ent of Public Works for approval. The report shall determine the stability of the soils at the project site and contain recommendations for alternative material types and any associated drainage facilities that will support a 30,000 pound emergency vehicle. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall ~ a waiver, releasing the City of Temecula of any liability in the event that emergency vehicles cannot u~!iTe the drive lane. The all-weather access shall be continuously maintained by the property owner such that it will support a 30,000 pound emergency vehicle at all The City of Temecuh will not accept or msintsin the roadway until it has been improved to City of Temecula Standards as identified in the Circulation Blement of the General Plan." Section 2. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the pwvisions of this Ordinance is sevemble and ff for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, pamgx~h, or section of this ordinance to be invalid, such decisions shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. R:\STAFFRPT\PAVE-ORD.CC 2/15/9~ ktb 4 Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Cleric shall certify to the adoption of thi.~ Ordinance. The City Cledc shall publish a summary of this Offfinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordimnce, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordirmnce, together with the names of the Councilmemben voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 199. ATTEST: RON ROBBRTS MAYOR ~lune S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] R:\STAFFRPT\PAVE-QRD.CC 2/15/96 ktb 5 STATB OF CP, LrFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF T!~tLr'l.r!A) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing ~ No. 94-_ was duly introduced and placed upon i~s tint reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 199_, and thai therea~r, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed a regular meeting of the City Council on the ~ day of , 1994 by the following ton call vote: COUNCII31EMBER$: NOES: COUNCrLMEMBERS: COUNC~LM]~J~P~: lune S. ~, City Clerk Scott F. Field City Attorney R:\STAFFRPT\PAVE-ORD,CC Z/15/~ ktb 6 ATI'ACHMENT NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 7, 1994 R:\STAFFRPT\PAVE-ORD.CC 2/14/W, ktb 7 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning~'' February 7, 1994 An Amendment to Section 18.28.A.C.(10) of Ordinance No. 348 Pertaining to the Type of Paving Material Required for Access to Second Dwelling Units Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: ADOPT Resolution No. 94- recommending approval of an amendment to Section 18.28.A.Co(10) of-Ordinance No. 348 entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION NO. 18.28.A.C.(10) OF ORDINANCE NO. 348 PERTAINING TO THE TYPE OF PAVING MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR ACCESS TO SECOND DWELLING UNITS" BACKGROUND On November 1,1993 the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. 1, for a second dwelling unit. At that meeting, the Commission was informed that pursuant to Section 18.28.A.C.(10) of Ordinance No. 348, any second unit placed more than 150 feet from a public right-of-way shall be required to provide all-weather access for emergency vehicles. Current ordinance provisions require a 28' wide asphaltic concrete paved road. The applicant, in this case, would have been .required to provide approximately 500 feet of 28 foot wide asphaltic concrsted paved road to provide all-weather access per Ordinance No. 348. The applicant expressed that would be a hardship for them. The Commission approved the project with no modification to this requirement. Subsequently, the applicant filed an appeal to the City Council appealing the Conditions of Approval requiring street improvement plans and the strict interpretation of "all-weather" aCCeSS. The City Council, at their January 11, 1994 meeting, seeked to provide some relief for applications of this type. They directed the Commission to consider an Amendment to Section No. 18.28.A.C(10) of Ordinance No. 348 - a requirement for all-weather access for emergency vehicles to any second unit placed more than 150 feet form a public right-of-way. This ordinance amendment will allow staff to exercise some "flexibility" to the existing requirements. The draft Ordinance Amendment is included in this report as Attachment No. 2. R:~TAReRYI~PA~.~ 2~1/94 Idb 1 DISCUSSION Staff prepared the language for the Ordinance Amendment at the direction of the City Council. It was the Council's intent to provide relief from the existing requirement for one specific type of paving material for "all-weather" access. The language was provided by the City Attorney, the Riverside County Fire Department, the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works. The draft Ordinance was included in the City Council Staff Report dated January 11, 1994. The recommended language for the amendment to Section 18.28.a.c.(10) of Ordinance No. 348 is indicated in bold: "Any second unit placed more than 150 feet from a public right-of-way shall be required to provide all-weather access for emergency vehicles from a pubiidy maintained mad. Asphaltic or concrete paving is required for all-weather access; however, this requirement may be waived if all of the following conditions are met: A soils report (prepared by a licensed soil or civil engineer) is submitted to the Department of Public Works for approval. The report shall determine the ability of the soils at ~e project site and contain recommendations for altamative material types and any associated drainage facilities that will support a 30,000 pound emergency vehicle. The applicant records a waiver against the property, releasing the City of Temecula of any liability in the event that emergency vehicles cannot utilize the ddve lane. The City of Temecula will not accept or maintain the roadway until it has been improved to City of Temecula Standards as identified in the Circulation Bement of the General Plan." ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION This Ordinance Amendment is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303 of the CEQA Guidelines. This exemption applies to the construction and location of limited numbers of new structures including single-family residences not in conjunction with the building of two or more such units. Construction of a driveway to the structure is a logical component of this section. In addition, because of limited City-wide second unit application, the cumulative impact of this Ordinance Amendment will not be significant. Attachments: PC Resolution - Blue Page 3 Draft Ordinance - Blue Page 6 R:~rAPI~Pr~A~aD.PC 2/1~ ~b 2 A'!'rACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 94.- ATrA~ NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 94 - A RESOLUTION OF TffE FLANNING CO1VIM't.~SION OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA RECO~INC, APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION NO. 18.28.A.C.(10) OF ORDINANCE NO. 348 PERTAINING TO ~ TYPE OF PAVING MATERIAL REQUI~ FOR ACCESS TO SECOND DW~-r.~IG UNITS WHKR~,~, the Planning Commition considered an Amendment to Section No. 18.28.a.c.(10) to Ordinanc~ No. 348 on February 7, 1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; WHERE&S, at said public hpmring, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, ff any, of all persons deserving to be heard, the Commi,~ion considered all facts NOW, T~'~FORE, ~ PLANNING COMMtgSION OF ~ CITY OF TEME~ DOES RESOLd, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOIJ~OWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are tn~e and corre~. S~tion 2. Findin~,s. A. The Planning Comminsion in recommending approval of an Amendment to SeCtion No. 18.2g.a.c.(10) to Ordinan~ No. 348 makes the following findings, to wit: 1. It is the Mission of the City of Temecula to mnintnin a safe, secure, clean, healthy and orderly community. 2. It is necess3ry to re-examine the regulations of the zoning ordinance relating to the type of paving material required for access to second dwelling units. 3. The On~nan~ Amendment will not have a significant impa~t on the environment since the project is a Class 3 Categorical Exemption pursuant to the C~liforllia Environmental Quality Act. 4. The Ordinnnc~ Amendment will result to the logical development of the City, and is compatible with the present and future development of the surrounding property. 5. The Ordinance Amendment is compatible with the health, safety and weftare of the community. R:~T~AVB-OID.PC ~1/9~. klb 4 Section 3. l~vironmcntal Cofflpllan~,. This ~~ ~c~t h ~~y ~ ~m tc ~o~ h~m~ ~ ~ (~A) p~ e S~ 15303 · c ~A G~aideline& ~ ~~on ~ ~ ~ ~~on ~d 1~ ~ !im~ nm~n of ff m~ ~g ~g~y ~~ n~ ~ ~nj~on wit ~ b~g of mo or mo~ inch ~U. Com~n ~ a ~veway m ~ m~ b a 1o~ ~m~t of ~ ~on. ~ ~~, ~q~ ~ lim~ C~-w~ ~ ~t ~~on, ~ m~ve ~ of ~ ~ ~~ w~ ~ ~ ~. Seefion 4. PASSliD, APPROVED AND ADOPTRB thi.~ 7th day of February, 1994. STEVEN J. FORD CHAIRMAN I/m'.~ty CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 7th day of February, 1994 by the following vote of the Commition: PLANNING CO1VHVHSSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: G~Y~ORNtm~- SECRECY R:~TAI~mltFI~IsAVB-ORD.PC 2/1/~S ldb 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 94.- R:~rAFF]/Pr~AVB-OP.D.ImC 2flY94 itJb 6 ATTA~ NO. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 94- AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION NO. 18,28,A,C,(10) OF ORDINANCE NO. 348 PERTAINING TO Tvff. TYPE OF PAVING MATERIAL REQUIRRB FOR ACCESS TO SECOND DWEr .T 3NG UNITS CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CAT,rsORN~, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. City Ordin.-ce No. 90-04 adopted by reference cert~i- portion of the Non- Codified Riverside County Ordinances, including Ordinance No. 348. Section 18.28.a.c.(10) of Ordinance No. 348 is hereby mended to read as follows: (lo) Any second unit phced more th3n 150 feet from a public right-of-way shall be required to pwvide all-weather access for emergency vehicles from a publicly m~inmined road. Aspbaltic or concrete paving is required for all-weather access; however, thi.~ requirement may be waived if all of the following conditions are met: A soils report (prepared by a licensed soft or civil engineer) is submitted to the Department of Public Works for approval. The report shah determine the stability of the soils at the project site and contain recommendations for alternative mamrial types and any associated drainage facilities that will support a 30,000 pound emergency vehicle. The applicant records a waiver, releasing the City of Temecula of any liability in the event that emergency vehicles cannot utiliTe the drive lane. The City of Temecuh will not accept or msalnt~in the roadway until it has been improved to City of Temecuh Standards as identified in the Circulation Element of the General Plan. Section 2. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of thi.~ Ordinance is seven~ble and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shah hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this ordinance to be invalid, such decisions shah not affect the validity Of the _remsaining parts of this Ordinance. Seaion 3. Notice of Adoption. Within 10 days after the adoption hereof, the City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be posted in at least three public places in the City. Sectinn 4. Taking Effea. This ordinance shall take cffea 30 days after the date of its adoption. R:~STAFFRFI~AV~ORD.pC ~'I/94 Mb 7 Section ~. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPT~ this day of ,199. RON ROBHRTS MAYOR ATTE3T: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss crrY OF I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temec~,l,,, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 94-_ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 199_, and that ~, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed a regular meeting of the City Council on the __th day of , 1994 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCrt-~rP~[BERS: COUNt: COUNTERS: lune S. Crreek, City Clerk Scott F. Field City Attorney R:~I'AFFRP'I~AVB-ORD.PC 2/1~ Hb 8 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 7, 1994 R:\STAFFRPT\PAVE-ORD.CC 2/1&/9~. kLb 8 Se EJjMiNINa nnlilllmeel0N MINtJTI:~ J~UF :C FARiNa ITa:MS 7. DRAFT Proposed amendment to Ordinance No. 460 to elmplify the current rules for merging mjlatenclard parcels. Planner David Hogan presented the staff report. Chairman Ford opened the public headng at 7:20 P.M. Chairman Ford suggested · defirddon of property owner be included in the ordinance or draft the ordinance to refer to the owner of record. Commluione Hoegland suggested a definition of owner be induded and rote the owner is the 'dtle holder of record or all tide holders of record'. Assistant City Attorney Grsg Diaz asked if the Commission prefers consent or nodce of the first or second trust deed property owners. The overall consensus of the Commission is to accept notice of additional title holders. It we moved by Commisdonar Hcogland, seconded by Commisdoner Blair to close the public headrig at 7:20 P.M. and Adopt Resolution No. g4- recommending that the City Council adept an ordinance amending Section 16.7 of Ordinance No. 460 pertaining to the merger of condguous parcels. The motion carded as follows: AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Hoegland, Salyer, Ford NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None An Ameeiklaent to I;e cl:a., He. 18.28.A.C.(10) of Of 4Olnce No. 348 Proposal to amend Ordinance No. 348 partairdng to the type of paving matodd required for access to second dwelling units. Planner Matthew Fagan presented the staff report. Chairman Ford opened the public headng at 7:25 P.M. Commialoner Hoegland questioned the legality of Sendon (B) of the amendment regarding recordedon of a waiver. EI,~iililin ~'qIIMISSION MINttiTle Assistant CAW Attorney Gag Diaz aid by recording a waive against the property, provide evidence the property owners is accepting some dsk. Commissioner Hoegland suggested staff ask the Firs Department for their comments regarding action (A) of the amendment. He said he feels the City should have input regarding acceptable materials. Commissioner Hoegland suggested the City should evaluate a couple of alternatives or guidelines for conforming to Section (A) of the amendment. Commissioner Hoegland laid he feels the language is fine however, he liked the previous requirement for a 28' AJC read and if you did not have the requirement for dmt, then a second unit is not acceptable. Principal Engineer Ray Casoy mild staff b concerned with making deign recommendations. Chairman Ford ex4x. e_-xe ~' concern there is no timing related to the recordellen of the waiver against the property and suggested amending the ordinance to read "pdor to issuence of building permit". Cheirmsn Ford added That he feels a maintenance clause stating dw property owner ia responsible for the mmintenence of ~he readway should be included. It wee moved by Commisdonsr Febey, seconded by Commlakioner Blair to doe the public headng st 7:30 P.M. and to Adopt Resolution No. 94- recommending approval of an amendment to Section 18.28.A.C.(10) of Ordinance No. 348, with the following changes: B. It Is the applicsnt's mspenibOity to maintain the access such that it wgl continua to support 8 30,000 pound emergency veNcle.; C. The applicant records a waiver against the preparty, releaing the City of Temecule of any liability in the event that emergency vehicles cannot utilize the ddve lane, pdor to the iuuance of building permits. The motion carded st follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Salyer, Ford NOES: I COMMISSIONERS: Hoegland ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None PLANNING DIRwCTO R'S PwPOR'I' Planning Director Gary Themhill rsperted the fo~owlng: Kemper Development is planning to resurrect some of their dormant projects and staff would like consensus from the Commission on holding an additional meeting on Mareh 21, 1994 to review some of ease projects. The consensus of the Commission was to meet on March 21, 1994. ITEM NO. 13 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAl CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning February 22, 1994 Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. I - Second Unit Permit - Appeal of Conditions of Approval No. 31 and 42 (requirement for the all- weather access to the second unit) Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REGARDING THE APPEAL BY RAYMOND AND ODETTE DETOBERT AND MICHELLE HAPlOT AND APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0179, AMENDMENT NO. I BACKGROUND: This item was originally heard by the City Council st their December 14, 1993 end was continued until January 11, 1994. The item was continued again at this meeting, and the applicant requested that it be brought before the City Council on the same date that an amendment to Section No. 18.28.A.C.(10) of Ordinance No. 348 is to be heard by the City Council (The Planning C. ommission approved an Amendment to Section 18.28.e.c.(10) of Ordinance No. 348 by a 4-1 vote at their February 8, 1994 meeting). Staff was directed at the January 11, 1994 Council meeting to rectify the outstanding issue regarding a requirement for street improvement plans for the project. Public Works Staff has discussed the issue with the applicant's representative and recommends that the following conditions of approval be amended for the project: Condition No. 31 shall read as follows: In lieu of the normal requirement to prepare a set of plan and profile improvement plans as street right-of-way documents, Public Works Staff will accept grading plans with the addition of a centerline profile and the necessary street specifications. The plan and profile shall show the location of existing utilities and facilities within the right-of-way as directed by the Department of Public Works. R:~TAPFRPT%l'79PA93.CC3 2/14/94 k~ 1 Condition No. 42 shall read as follows: Adequate right-of-way shall be dedicated along Jeffery Heights Road and Aussie Avenue to provide for s 60 foot full width right-of-way including a cul-de-sac at their tarmini and required corner property line cut off in accordance with City Standards. A. An all-weather access shall be designed by a registered Engineer and constructed to be consistent with Section 18.28a.c.(10) of Ordinance No. 348 as amended. B. The driveway and the access to the site shall be designed and constructed relative to the ultimate design of Aussie Avenue or Jeffery Heights including a turn around at the terminus as directed by the Department of Public Works. C. The improvements shall accommodate the natural drainage course crossing the road. All necessary permits shall be obtained from appropriate agencies; i.e. the Department of Fish and Game, Army Corps· of Engineers, and Regional Water Quality Control Board, as deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works. It should be noted that if the Council adopts the Amendment to Section 18.28.a.c.(10) of Ordinance No. 348, it shall go into effect thirty (30) days from the date of the second reading of the Ordinance Amendment. This would require the applicant to wait until the thirty (30) day period is over to obtain building permits. FISCAL IMPACT b/pne. Attachments: Resolution 94- - Page 3 Conditions of Approval (Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. 1 ) - Page 7 R:~TAPPRPT~I'~gPA9~.CC3 ~1~1. ~ 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 94- R:~TAFIrR]~179PA93.CC3 2/10/94 Idb 3 -- ATFA~ NO. 1 I~Y-~JOLUTION NO. 94-- A RESOLUTION OF THR CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF T~tECULA REGARDING THE APPEAL BY RAYMOND AND ODETTE DEROBERT AND MIC!~JJ.R HAPIOT AND APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0179, AMENDMENT NO. 1. WI~EREAS, Raymond and OdeOc Deroben and Michelle Hapiot filed Planning Application No. 93-0179 in ~ce with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinance, which the City has adopted by reference; WH~tI~AS, said Planning Application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local hw; ~, the Planning Commi.~sion considered said Planning Application on November 1, 1993, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by hw, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and argmnents, ff any, of nil persons deserving to be heard, said Commission considered all facts rehting to Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. 1; WHRRRAS, at the conclusion of the Commls:sion hearing, the Commission approved said Planning Application; WHEREAS, an appeal of the Planning Commi.~sion decision for conditions of approval pertaining to the definition of all-weather access for emergency vehicles was made in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, and Phnning OrdinalIces, which the City has adopted by reference; WBRRRAS, said Appeal application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local hw; W~'~-~,S, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Appeal on December 14, 1993, at which time Staff was directed to prepare an Amendment to Section No. 18.28.A.C.(10) pertaining to the definition of all-weather access for emergency vehicles; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered said Appeal on January 11, 1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by hw, at which time interested persons had an opporUmity to testify either in support or in opposition; WHEREAS, the City Council continued said Appeal until an Amendment to Section 18.28.a.c.(10) of Ordinance No. 348 came before them; R:~T~I79PA93.CC3 ~10/9~ klb 4 WHEREAS, the City Council considered said Appeal on January 11, 1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; WngnRJi$, punurn to the appeal, the City Council ¢onsidex~ the application De Novo; A. The City Council, in ~pproving of the proposed Planning Application, makes the following findings, to wit: 2. The ~ use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. The pn~sed project is consistent with Ordinance No. 348. The project meets the criteria prescribed under Section 18.28.a. (Second Unit Permit) of Ordinance No. 348. 3. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical development of the land and is compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. The project meets the criteria prescribed under Section 18.28.a. (Second Unit Permit) of Ordinance No. 348. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area. The project conforms with applicable land use and development regulations. 4. The proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment since the project is a Class 3 Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quanty Act. B. As conditioned pursuant to Section 4, the Planning Application proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future development of the surrounding property. Section 3. l~vironm~.~l Con~plizmce. The proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment since the project is a Class 3 Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. 1 to construct a second dwelling unit located at 31550 Calle Girasol and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 914-480-006 subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto. R:~rAFFP, PT~I?9PA93.CC3 2/10/94 klb 5 -'- S{~tion 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPT!~ this llth day of January, 1994. ATTBST: RON ROBERTS MAYOR June S. Greek, City Clerk [SBAL] STATE OF CALIFO~) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS crrY TaMB:ULA) I ln~RERy CERTWf that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the llth day of January, 1994 by the following vote of the Council: COUNTERS: NOES: COUNCH~IBERS: COUNCII,IVl]~IBERS: /UNES. GP, E[~ CITYO-n~,K R:ISTAFFRP~179PA93.CC3 2/10/94 ]rib 6 A'I'I'ACHMENT NO. 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:~STAFFRI~179PA93.CC3 2/10/94 ]db 7 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No.1 - Second Unit Permit Project Descdpljon: A request to construct a new 2,195 square foot dwelling unit on a parcel which already contains an existing 1,536 square foot structure. The new unit will become the pdmaW unit end the existing structure will become the secondary unit. The project is located in the Rural Residential (R-R 2 1/2) zone. The project site is located st 31550 Calla Giresol. Assessor's Parcel No.: 914-480-006 Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Requirements e The use hereby permitted by this Planning application is to construct a new 2,195 square foot dwelling unit on a parcel which already contains an existing 1,536 square foot structure· The new unit will become the primary unit and the existing structure will become the secondary unit. The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. I - Second Unit Permit. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. The second unit shall be used for family members or rental purposes only and may not be sold as a separate unit unless the lot is subdivided pursuant to all applicable laws and local ordinances. The second unit shall be used as a dwelling unit only, and no businesses or home occupations of any kind may be conducted from or in the second unit· This approval shall be valid for five (5) years. The project shall be consistent with Section 18.28.a of Ordinance No. 348. The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as shown on the site plan marked Exhibit A, or as amended by these conditions. R:~TAFFR~179PA93.C'C3 7/10/94 klb 8 8. Building elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit B. ~ Wood Siding: Earthenware (Frazee 5203 M) Wood Trim: Candlewax (Frazee 4500 W) Roof: Composition Shingle Within Forty-Bght (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project a The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order payable to the County Clark in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) County administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to tha Planning Department the check required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be voided by reason of failure of condition. Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits 10. Tho applioont shall oomply with Ordinanoo No. GC3 by paying tho foo roquirod by that ordinanoo whioh is boaod on (tho grooo aoroogo of tho peroolo propoood for dovolopmont), Should Ordinonoo No. £S3 bo ouporoodod by tho provioiono of e I labitot Conaorvotion Plan prior to tho peymont of tho fooo roquirod by Ordinanoo No. (:C3, tho opplioant shall pay tho foo rocluirod undor tho I labitat Conoorvotion Plan o~ implomontod by County ordinanoo or rooolution. (Deleted at the Planning Commission hearing on November 1, 1993). Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 11. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 12. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1991 edition of the Uniform Building, Plumbing and Mechanical; 1990 National Electrical Code; California Administrative CoEle Title 24 Energy and Handicapped Regulations and the Temecula Coda. 13. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. 14. The applicant shall provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans submitted for plan review. 15. The applicant shall provide electrical plan including load calcs and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. R:~'FAFFg. P~I'79PA93.CC3 2/10/94. Idb 9 · ~'- PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff parson of the Department of Public Works. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site plan all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. General Requirements 16. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all onsite flat work and improvements) grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right- of-way. 17. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 18. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 19. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. 20. The Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: · · · · · · · · San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board Planning D~partment Department of Public Works Riverside County Health Department Community Services District General Telephone Southern California Edison Company Southern California Gas Company 21. A Grading Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, City Standards, and as required in these Conditions of Approval. R:~qTAPPRPT~I79PA93.CC3 2/10/94 IrJb 10 A Soils Report prepared by a registered Soils Engineer shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. 23. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weedfree condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Department of Public Works. 24. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District prior to issuance of any permit. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has been already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. 25. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. 26. A drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners for the release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy of the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review prior to recordation. The location of the recorded easement shall be delineated on the precise grading plan. 27. The Developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the Developer shall provide adequate facilities as approved by the Department of Public Works. 28. The Developer shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adecluate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing facilities or by securing a drainage easement. 29. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. Prior to the Issuance of Encroachment Permits 30. All necessary grading permit requirements shall have been accomplished to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. R:~qTAFFRPT~179PA93.CC3 2/10/94 ldb 11 31. In lieu of the normal requirement to prepare a set of plan and profile improvement plans as street right-of-way documents, Public Works Staff will accept grading plans with the addition of a centerline profile and the necessary street specification. The plan and profile shall show the location of existing utilities and facilities within the right-of-way as directed by the Department of Public Works. 32. The Developer shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be executed guarantaeing the construction of the following public and private improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. A. Street improvements B. Storm drain facilities C. Sewer and domestic water systems 33. All required fees shall be paid. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 34. The Developer shall receive written clearance from the following. agencies: Riverside County Fire Department Planning Department Department of Public Works 35. All necessary construction or encroachment permits have been submitted/accomplished to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. 36. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the Department of Public Works 37. All building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue e Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 38. The Developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established per acre/unit as mitigation for traffic signal impact. 39. The Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. "If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which the Developer requests its building permit for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to the Developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, the Developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount of the bond shall be 02.00 per square foot, not to exceed 010,000. The Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment R:~fI'~I79PA93.CC3 2/10/94 of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, the Developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; orovided that the Developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof. Pdor to Issuance of Certification of Occupancy 40. The Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: · · · · · · · Rancho California Water District Eastern Municipal Water District General Telephone Southern California Edison Southern California Gas Planning Department Department of Public Works 41. All improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards, including but not limited to curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees, street lights on all interior public streets, signing, striping, traffic signal interconnect, and traffic signals. 42. Adequate right-of-way shall be dedicated along Jeffery Heights Road and Aussie Avenue to provide for a 60 foot full width right-of-way including a cul-de-sac at their termini and required corner property line cut off in accordance with City Standards. An all-weather access shall be designed by a registered Engineer and constructed to be consistent with Section 18.28a.c.(10) of Ordinance No. 348 as amended. The driveway and the access to the site shall be designed and constructed relative to the ultimate design of Aussie Avenue or Jeffery Heights including a turn around at the terminus as directed by the Department of Public Works. The improvements shall accommodate the natural drainage course crossing the road. All necessary permits shall be obtained from appropriate agencies; i.e. the Department of Fish and Game, Army Corps. of Engineers, and Regional Water Quality Control Board, as deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works. 43. In the event road or off-site right-of-way are required to comply with these conditions, such easements shall be obtained by the Developer; or, in the event the City is required to condemn the easement or right-of-way, as provided in the Subdivision Map Act, the Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City for the acquisition of such easement at the Developer's cost pursuant to Government Code Section 66462.5, which shall be at no cost to the City. OTHER AGENCIES 44. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District transmittal dated October 14, 1993, a copy of which is attached. 45. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Health Department transmittal dated October 1, 1993, a copy of which is attached. 46. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Fire Department transmittal dated October 25, 1993, a copy of which is attached. R:~TAFFRP~I79PA93.CC3 2/10/94 Idb 14 Wmr Deaf Kuibml Preu6,n~ Jeffrey L. Minitier Kelpis H. Daily · ~aney K. Hughes Csaisa F. Ko Lisa D. Peterson Richard D. StefTey John F. HenniKar C,,..eeral Mamaear Phillip L. Forbes Din. ru~r k,~ Finante · E. P. "T~b' Lemons Dlrea,~' M' Fnk'lnt, ennl[ ~enneth C. Dolly D:rt, ct~r ,~ Operations & .%ironschance Perr~ R, Louek tCe~ntt~|ler Linda .~1. Fregoso ~)i,trsa :'~cn,ury Jannine[L Enlistrand & !J~nrikson October 14, 1993 RECEIVED 0 C T 18 15 3 Mr. Matthew Fagan City of Temecula Planning Department 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 Water Availability APN 914480-006, PA93-0179 Second Unit Permit Dear Mr. Fagan: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of RancOo California Water District (ECWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to R.C~VD. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Senga Doherty. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Steve Brannon, P.E. Development Engineering Manager S8:SO:eb08/F186 cc: Senga Doherty, Engineering Technician RancOo Lalitornia Water Di,triet TO: FROM RE: County of Riverside DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH C1TY OF TEMECULA PLANNINGD~. SECOND UNiT PEgMIT NO. PA93-0179 DATE: October 1, 1993 RECEIVED 0 CT ~ 5 1993 ~ns 'd ........... , The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Second Unit Permit No. PA93-0179 and will requirc the following items PRIOR TO BUZLDING PIAN APPROI/AL: Adequate/satisfactory detailed soils pcrcolation testin8 in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Riverside County Waste Disposal Booldet entitled "Waste Disposal for Individnal Homes, Commercial 2. A "will-serve" letter for potable water from the appropriate agency providing water mace. 3. Three detailed drawn to scale ( 1 "=20~ of the proposed subsurface sewage disposal system and floor plan/plumbing schedule to ensure septic tnnk si~ing. SM:dr (909) 275-8980 RiVERSIDE C O UNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 210 Ve~..ST SAN JACIiNTO AVENUE · PERRXS, C..,%i'-YR3RNIA 99_.~70 · (909) 657-3183 October 25, 1993 TO: Pl~.~ing Department ATTEN: Matthew Fags- RE: PA93-0179 With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced second unit permit, The Fire Deparr_ment recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with the City of Temecula Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: The water mains shall be a minimum of 6" diameter and shall be capable of providing a potential fire flow of 500 GPM for 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure The required fire flow shall be available from a standard fire hydrant (6"x4"x2 1/2") within 500 feet of the property. The applicant/developer shall be responsible to submit written certification from the water company noting location of the existing fire hydrant and the existing water system is capableof delivering 500 GPM fire flow for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. If a water system currently.does not exist, the applicant/developer shall be responsible to provide written certification that financial arrangements have been made to provide them. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials-being placed on the job site. Driveways over 150 feet in length shall have a turn around' at the second unit, capable of accoa~t~dating fire apparatus. Any secondunit placed more than 150 feet from any public right-of-' way Shall be required to'provide an all-weather access for emergency vehicles. Access shall not have an up or down grade of more than 15%. Access will not be less than 12 feet in width will have a vertical clearance of 13'6". Access will be free of sharp confined turns. Access will be designed to withstand the weight of any type of emergency vehicle. Access will have a turning radius of 45 feet capable of accoam~odating fire apparatus. ~RE PREVE~'TF1ON DIV~ION ~ RIVE~IDE OFFIa PI..ANNING SECTION ~ INDIO OFFi~ 37~ 12th Si~t, ~versi~, CA 9~01 ' (909) 27547~ · FAX (909) 3~-~5 1 79-733 C. ounu7 Club Driv~ Sui~ F, Indio, CA 92201 (619) 863-8886 · FA~ {619) 863-7072 All buildings shall be constructed with fire retardant roofing material as described in Section 3203 of the UniformBuilding Code. Any wood shingles or shakes shall be a Class "B" rating and shall be approved by the fire Department prior to installation. Street address shall be posted, in a visible location, minimum 4 inches in height, on the street side of the building with a contrasting background. Prior to Ehe issuance of building permits, the developer shall deposit, with the City' of Temecula, the sum of $400.00 per unit mitigation for fire protection impacts. All questions regarding the meaning of ~hese conditions shall be referred to the Fire Department Planning and engineering section. RAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner by~~/~/~ Laura Cabral Fire Safety Specialist ITEM NO. ,TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY. ATTORNEY '~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER ,,* CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning~r// February 22, 1994 Ordinance Amending the Land Use Code Regarding the Term of Plot Plans, Conditional Use Permits, and Public Use Permits Prepared By: Debbie Ubnoske RECOMMENDATION: 1. Read by title only and introduce an Ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94-_ =AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND PUBLIC USE PERMITS.' 2. Adopt · Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- "RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND PUBLIC USE PERMITS." BACKGROUND At the April 5, 1993 Planning Commission meeting, staff recommended the Commission amend Ordinance 348 to allow for two additional one year extensions of time for Plot Plans, Conditional Use Permits, and Public Use Permits. At this meeting, the Commission expressed a concern relative to extending the life of permits they had never seen and requested staff research the number of Council epproved projects which had not expired and bring it beckto the Commission. Staff researched City approvals for the period from April 1990 to June 1990 which was the period of time the City Council acted solely to approve or deny projects. During this period, the City Council acted on eight County transferred plot plans end no conditional use permits or public use permits. Of the eight plot plans acted on, all have either been constructed or have expired. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare an Ordinance providing for two additional years to allow applicants additional time to construct their projects. Commissioner Hoegland was opposed to such an Ordinance. He felt giving applicants an additional two years was not in the City's best interest. At the December 6, 1993 Planning Commission meeting, the Ordinance was presented and approved by the Commission three to one with Commissioner Noagland in opposition. Pursuant to prior Council direction, Sention 4 of the attached Ordinance allows permittees to request reinstatement of expired City approved applications within six months of the date the Council adopts this Ordinance. The reinstatement hearing will be conducted by the Planning Director. For example, if the City had approved a conditional use permit on the date of incorporation, December 1, 1989, the permit would have expired on November 30, 1991. Under Section 4 of this Ordinance, the Planning Director could grant the permittee up to three one-year extensions of time. The effect of this would be to extend the permit to November 30, 1994. If the conditional usa permit had been approved on December 1, 1990 and had expired on November 30, 1992, the Planning Director could now grant two additional extensions in the following years to extend it up to November 30, 1995. Staff will contact all applicants who will be able to avail themselves of these additional time extensions. FISCAL IMPACT Adoption of this Ordinance could result in a positive fiscal impact in that it will provide businesses additional time in which to obtain funding and begin construction of their projects. Attachments: Resolution No. 94- - Page 3 Ordinance No. 94- - Page 6 Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 11 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 94,- RESOLUTION NO. 94- RF.,~LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ~OMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND PUBLIC USE WH!~FAS, City Ordinance No. 90-04 adopted by reference certain portions of the non- codified Riverside County Ordinances, including Ordinance No. 348 ("Land Use Code"); and WREREAS, such regulations provide for extensions of time for plot plans, conditional use permits, and public use permits; and WH~:REAS, the City of Temecula wishes to provide for an additional period of time to allow for the development of approved projects; and WHERv-4kS, a public heating was conducted on December 6, 1993, January 25, 1994 and February 22, 1994 at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; and WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, County Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOT~LOWS: Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds that there are no County cases remaining that would be able to avail themselves of these additional extensions of time. Section 2. That the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds that the proposed Ordinance providing for two additional one year extensions of time will benefit businesses in the City of Temecula. Section 3. That the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds that this Ordinance is exempt through Section 21080 of the California Environmental Quality A~t. Section 4. That the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby recommends adoption of the proposed additional extension of time Ordinance. The Ordinance is incorporated into this Resolution by this reference. it:~STAFFRPr~,ANDUS~.CC ~/14/94 tjs 4 Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of February, 1994. RONA~ .r~ ROBERTS MAYOR I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 22nd day of February, 1994 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNC~: COUNTERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: / S. crrYcLKp, K R:~sr,,,~Da, nL, ksDums. cc 2/14/g~ ~ [i ATTACHMENT NO. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 94- ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING ~ TERM OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, PUBLIC USE PERMITS AND PLOT PLANS ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TE~ECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Seelion 1. Article XVIII, Section 18.30(f) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348, as adopted by reference pursuant to City Ordinance No. 90-04, and as amended pursuant to City Ordinance No. 91-09, is hereby amended to read as follows: "f. APPROVED PERIOD. The approval of a plot plan shah be valid for a period of two years from its effective date within which time the construction authorized must be substantially begun or the occupancy authorized be in use; otherwise, the approval shall be void and of no further effect. Notwithstanding the faregoing, the permittee may, prior to the expiration of the plot plan, apply for up to three (3), one (1) year extensions of time in which to use the plot plan. Each extension of time shah be granted in one (1) year increments only. An application for an extension of time shall be made to the Phnning Director, on forms provided by the Phnning DeparUnent and shah be filed with the Plnnning Department, accompanied by the approp, late filing fee. Within thirty (30) days following the filing of an application for an extension of time, the Planning Director may approve, conditionally approve or deny the application. An extension of time may be granted by the Phnning Director only upon a determinntion that the propcity and use are consistent with the General Plan, Land Use Ordinance, and all other City Ordinances and regulations. ff an extension is granted, the total time allowed for use of the approval shah not exceed n period of five (5) years, calculated from the effective date of the The term "use" shall mean the beginning of a substantial con~on of the use that is authorized, which construction must thereafter be pursued diligen~y to completion, or the actual occupancy of existing buildings or land under terms of the authorized use. The effective date of a plot plan shall be deln'mined pursuant to Section 18.26 of this Ordinance.' Section 2. Article XVHI, Section 18.28(0 of Ordinance No. 348, as adopted by reference pursuant to City Ordinance No. 90-04, is hereby amended to read as follows: "e. APPROVPr~ PERIOD. The approval of a conditional use permit shah be valid for a period of two years from its effective date within which time the eonstruetion authorized must be substnvtlnlly. begun or the occupancy authorized be in use; otherwise, the approval shall be void and of no flirther effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the permittee may, prior to the expiration of the conditional use permit, apply for up to three (3), one (1) year extensions of time in which to use the plot plan. ~-qch extension of time shah be granted in one (1) year increments only. An application for an extension of time shah be made to the Planning Director, on forms provided by the Planning Depamnent and shall be filed with the Planning Department, accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. Within thirty (30) days following the filing of an application for an exUmsion of time, the Phnning Director my approve, conditionally approve or deny the application. An extension of time may be granted by the Planning Director only upon a determination that the pwpeny and use are consistent with the General Phn, Land Use Ordinance, and all other City Ordinances and reguhtions. If an extension is granted, the total time allowed for use of the approval shall not exceed a period of five (5) years, calculated from the effective date of the The term "use" shall mean the beginning of a substantial construction of the use that is auth~, which construction must thereaf~ be pursued diligently to completion, or the actual occupancy of existing buildings or land under terms of the authoxjzBt use. The effective date of a conditional use permit shall be determined pursuant to Section 18.26 of this Ordinance." Section 3. Article XVHI, Section 18.29(e) of Ordinance No. 348, as adopted b.y reference pursuant to City Ordinance No. 9004, is hereby mended to x~td as follows: "e. APPROVPr~ PERIOD. The approval of a public use permit shall be valid for a period of two years from its effective date within which time the construction authm-iz~! must be substantially begun or the occupancy authorized be in use; otherwise, the approval shah be void and of no further effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the permittee may, prior to the expiration of the public use permit, apply for up to three (3), one (1) year extensions of time in which to use the plot plan. Each extension of time shall be granted in one (1) year increments only. An application for an extension of time shall be made to the Planning Director, on forms provided by the Planning ~ent and shall be filed with the Planning Department, accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. Within thirty (30) days following the filing of an application for an ~xtension of time, the Planning Director may approve, conditionally approve or deny the application. An extension of time may be granted by the Planning Director only ulxm a dete~on that the property and use are consistent with the General Plan, Land Use Ordinance, and all other City Ordinances and regulations. If an extension is granted, the total time allowed for use of the approval shall not exceed a period of five (5) years, calculated from the effective date of the The term "use" shall mean the beginning of a substantial consreaction of the use that is authorized, which construction must thereafar be pursued diligently to completion, or the actual occupancy of existin__g buildings or land under terms of the authorized use. The effective date of a public use pennit shall be determined pursuant to Section 18.26 of this Ordinance." Section 4. Notwithstanding the above, any plot plan, conditional use permit or public use permit which the City approved since incorporation and which has expired, may be reinstated pursuant to the procedure set forth above. In order to reinstate any such permit, the permittee must make an application to reinstate within 180 days of the effective date of this Section $. Severability. ff any provisions of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any period or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are declared to be severable. Section 6. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shah catify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Oldinance and a certified copy of the full text of thig Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of thig Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and pest the same in the office of the City Clerk. ATTEST: Ronald Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] R:~rAFRFrU.ANDUSB. CC ~IS/9~ ~ 9 STATE OF CAY IFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF ~ULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecuh, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 9~._ was duly introduced and phced upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 1994, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a reg~l_s_r meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the __ day of , 1994, by the following roll call vote: COUNCn-MEMB~: NOES: COUNCU~W,mMBERS: COUNCIl. MISfitS, S: R:~sr~usa. cc ~71sN4 ~, ATTACHMENT NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission 'Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning~''~' December 6, 1993 Ordinance Amending the Land Use Code Regarding the Term of Plot Plans. Conditional Use Permil~., and Public Use Permits Prepared by: Dabble Ubnoske RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMEND Adopting Resolution 93- adoption of an Ordinance emitled: recommending "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND PUBLIC USE PERMITS." BACKGROUND At the April 5, 1993 Planning Commission Meeting, staff recommended fiat me Commission amend Ordinance 348 to allow for two additional one year extensions of time. Some concerns were expressed by the Commission at the meeting relative to extending the life of projects the Commission had never seen. Staff researched Cih' approvals for the period from April 1990 to June 1990 which was the period of time the City Council acted solely to approve or deny projects. During this period, the CiW Council acted on eight County transferred plot plans. No conditional use or public use permits were acted on. Of the eight plot plans acted on, all have eitlqer been constructed or have expired. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission Meeting, the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare an Ordinance providing for two additional years to allow applicants additional time to construct their projects. Commissioner Hoagland was opposed to such an Ordinance. He fert giving applicants an additional two years was not in the City's best interests. DISCUSSION It is staff's opinion that the five year approval process would benafit businesses by providing them additional time in which to optain funding and begin construction, It is further ataff's opinion that there are no cases remaining from the County which would be able tO avai! themselves of this additional time, Section 4 of me attached Ordinance allows permittees to re{luest reinstatemere of expired City approved applications within six months of me date the Council adopts this Ordinance. The minatatemem hearing will be conducted by the Planning Director, For example, if the City had approved a conditional use permit on the date of incorporation, December 1, .1989, the permit would have expired on November 30, 1991, Under Section 4 of this Ordinance, the Planning Director could gram the permmee up to three one-year extensions of time, The effect of this would be to extend the permit to November 30, 1994, If the conditional use permit had been approved on December 1, 1990 and had expired on November 30, 1992, the Planning Director could now gram one extension at this time to extend the. permit to November 30, 1993, and then gram two additional extensions in the following--years to extend it up to November 30, 1995, -.. ENVIRONMENTAL D~INATION Adoption of this Ordinance is exempt ~qroUgh Section 21080 of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act, Attachments Resolution No, 93~- Blue Page 3 Ordinance No. 9~__.- Blue Page 6 Iq:~JT&ImR~ 11 ~ hie 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 93- RF. SOL~ITION NO. ~ p~'-~OLETION OFTre;'- PLANNING COlVlM'~.~SION OF T~F. CITY OF TEM~CULA P,,ECO~ING ~ CITY COUNCIL ADO Fr. AN ORDINANCE ~iNG ~ LAND USE CODE REGARDING THX TEEM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDrrIONAL USE FERMrrS, AND PUBLIC USE w s-. ,.:~'-4.S, City Oxdl,',=-,'.e No. 90-04 adopied by rdex'ence __~',,,_~,, portions of the non-. cod. ffled Riverside County Ordln=n,-es, indutll-.~ Ordin=,~ce No. 348 C'r =,~d Use Code"); and WH~:~,~iS, such xegulations provide for ex~-~ons of time for plot plans, conditional use pcnniu, and public use permits; and WH~:~-4~, the City of Temecula wishes to provide for an additional period of time to allow for the development of approved projects; and WRv~',4S, a public hearing was conducted on December 6, 1993, at which time interested persons had an oppomn~ to testify either in support or ol~poskion; and WW~R~'.A.S, notice of the pwpos~! Ordln-nc~ was posted at City Ft-n, County Library, "ncho Cniiiornia Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of _jmmcrcc; and NOW, 'rHK~:~ORE, ~ PLANNING COMI~-~SION OF Tm~. CITY OF TEvEECULA DOES RESOLVE, DEI'EKMINE AND ORDER AS FO! LOWS: Section 1. That the planning Cowmk-~ion of the City of Temecula ber~by finds that there ar~ no County cases rem~inin~ that would be able to avail themselves of these additional extensions of time. Section 2. That the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby finds that the proposed Ordinance providing for two additional one year extensions of time wffi benefit businesses in the City of Temeaxla. Section 3. That the Planning Commk~ion of the City of Temecula hereby finds that this Ordinance is exempt through Section 21080 of the r'=fifonm Environmental Q,,=Hty Act. Seaion 4. That the Planning Commksion of the City of Temecula ~ recommends to the City Council adoption of the proposed additional enension of time Ordi-=n~. The Ordinance is incorponmd into thk Re,~lution by thk zeference and marked Exhibit "A" and dar~l December 6, 1993, for identification. R:~.$~'TAIq:alIPI'%LANDUSF..F~ I1,~0j13 Idi 4. Section 5. PASSED, .a. PPRO~ AND ADOFI'ED ibis (r,.b dsy of Decmnber, 1993. S'i.=v.r_,l F. FORD CItAIRM. AN I ~Y f~at'x~u''xr thsu ~z'foxe-s°in~ P,~so~ was duly adoprod by ~hc Planning Commi-~,don of ~he City of Teme~d~ sX a ~ mee~iv,~ fizl~of, held on ~ 6~h day of December, 1993 by AYES: NOF, S: 'ABSIHqT: ~G COMMISSION*ERS: PLANNING COMMISSION]~RS: PLANNING COMMISSION]i:RS: G~Y~ORNI~- SECREtlY 11;29/93 idb 5 ATFACHMENT N0.2 ORDINANCE NO. 93- ORDINANCE NO 93-_ AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF ~ ~ING TKE LAND IJ~ CODE REGARDING ~ ~ OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMr~, PUBLIC EHE PERMI~ AND FLOT ~ ~ ~ COUNCIL OF Tsr~, crr~ OF ~ DOES m~-~y ORDA.I~ AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. ~ XVIII, Seezion 18.30(f) of Riverside County Oviin-,,ce No. 348, as adopted by r~fc, e~c~ punuant to City Ova-nee No. 90-04, and as =rnefi,i~d pursuant to City .Ordi-:nce No. 91439, is bereby .nmemtied W zad as follows: "f. APPROVED ~OD. The appzova! of a plot plan shall be valid for a period of two yeazs from its effeclive date wizhin which rime the consmxction authoxized must be s,,bs,~,n~my begun or the occ~,ncy mnhorized be in use; Notwith-~malnE the fcn~eoiug. the F',' ...;.ec may, In'ior w the expiredon of fine plot plan, apply for. up m three f3), one (1) year exumsions of time in which m use the plot plan. ~.ach r, rre~ of rifle shaIl be gmzned in one (1) year incr=men~ only. An appliu/ion for an exrgnsion of ~ne. shall be made w fine Planning Dirr. ctor, on forms provided by the 1D|'nrrin_~ ~e~ ~ Sba~ be filed with fine planning ~ accoml,~l~ied by the ~al~y, uyx~te ffi~_v fee. W~fhin thirty (30) days following fine ffilng of an appLk:adon for an c/xen-~inn of time, fine Planning Director my approve, conditionaIly alvpxove or deny fine application. · An extension of time may be granted by fine Planning ~ only upon a deterwin~rion that the l.,,ol/-a,y and use are con~-~.~,~ with the General Plan, ~,xd Use Or~in=nce, and all other City Or~nces and xzgulations. If an extension is gnnu~, the total time aIlowed for use of the appwv-al shall not exceed a period of five (5') years, c~n=,ed from the effective date of the The ~ "use' sbaJ1 mean the beg; .... ;hE of a subsUurrl,,1 consu'ucdon of fine use fina~ is authorized, which c. onsm~on mus~ ~ be trm'sued dilig~gly ro comphnion, or the acnual oc'~:,mcy of ~ri~ing b:,~rllnF or land under terms of fine aufino~zcd use. The effective daze of a plot plan shall be deu~...;.,r4 pursuant w Section 18,26 of ~hi.~ Ofrllr~nr,~," R:~%~..STA~NDI.~E.F~ 11/21/33 klb 7 Section 2. Article XVI]X, Seaion l 8.28(f) of Ord~nce No. 348, as ~dopr~:! r~f~rcnc= purF,,n~ w City Ordizauc~ No. 90-04, is hereby amended to read as follows: valid for a p~iod of two y~ms from ~ dr~ive da~ wi~hln which dine the consn-uaion sutoriz~ 'mus~ be subs~,,~ny b~,un or'tbe occupan:y anthoriz~ be in u.~; odzrwiz, dz zppwval shall be void and of no funh~ Notw~-~nd~nE the f~, the pe,,.,~t*~ may, prior w the expinfion of the condiionnl use pezmit, apply for up w three (3), one (1) year ex~ensious of drnc in which to use the plot plan. Eacli 6xlension of lime shml] be ~ranted in one (1) year inc=emems only. An application for an ean~n-~ion of ~ ~,.~n be un=ri~- m the tnmnnln~ Direaor, on forms ~ by the pi,n~i%~ Depamnen~ and ,h=n be filed with the l~=nn~ng Deparm~un, accomyanied by dz si,p,~p,is~ ~ni,,g fee. Within thirty (30) days following the f[lln_~ of all spplicmton for an exlension of lime, the Pl=~mh~L ~ may sppwv~, ~y sppmve or deny the applicslion. An e~-~e~cm of time may be ~-~nVH by the p}gnn~n~ ~ only upon a T~qd Use Oxd~ngn~, and all other ~xt70x~nc~s and x~la~ons. I~ an exce~l · period of five (~ yes.~, c~lc~l~red fwm r~ eftcalve dar~ of the approval. The term 'use' shall mean the beglnnlnE of a subsmznia] consmwtion of the use thax is authorized, which consrnaion mus~ tbercm~r be pursued a~igently w completion, or the acnal occupancy of e:ri~nE bv~riln~ or ]and under rgrms of the authorized use. The effective daze of a condidonnl use permit shall be d~rmined pursuam w Seaion 18.26 of this Ordinance.' "e. APPROVED PERIOD. The approval of a public use permit sb:n be valid for a period 6f two ycan from its effeclive da~ within which time the consms~on authorized must be subsmrnlally begun or the occupancy authorized bein use; ~herwise, tbcappzoval sba]I be void and of no fur, her~ NOtwith~nrGnE the fo,~soiug, the permince may, prior w the e~piraion of the public use permit, apply for up to thxee (3), one (1) year ex~s~ of lime in which w use the plo~ p!~n. Each e~n.~ion of time sh:;ll be graftted in one (1) year increments only. An applicaxiou for an e~xxen-',,ion of time shall be n.,,,,.i~ to the p1,nning l:~, on forms provided by the Pl,,nning l:)~lnX and shall be filed with. p!nefllng Depamnent, accompanied by the ayyxOpL.~Xe filing fee. Within ~ R:~IS~TA~I~ 11/2b~J3 klb 8 (30) days foliowin2 the ~lin2 of an applicaxion for an erietalon of dmc, the p~,,m~n~ ~ my appxove, con,4iHonally appxove or deny the applicaxion. An cnenxion of time may be rained by the p~o,,,,i... Dix=ct~- only upon a T ~nnrl TJ.~ C)~nnnc'~, 11~ ~11 ~ C::j~'y C)z'rl~nnc'~s zl~ l'~L~Txln~On.~. ~ extension is 2umed, the wml time allowed for use'of the approval shall noc cxceed a pcxiod of five (5') years, c~lc,,i,,ed from the effective date of thc The tam "use' 'shall mean the ~ng of a subsxanfial conm'uction c~f the use that is axxxhm:ized, which consnucxion must tht.,,.a.r~-r bc punucd fmi~=~x. ly w complexion, or the acxml oca~ncy of '~nE b~rjldlngS or hnd under ternis of the authox~ed use. The effective date ~f a public use penn/t shall be pureant to Section 18.26 of ~ix Ord~nnn~c.' Section 4. NOtwith-~ndlnE the abovc, any plot plan, conditional use permit or public use pcnnit which the CiW q~wed since inco,~,~,;on and which has expired, may be r~insmted pursuant to the procedure set forth above. In order to x~jn-~te any such pertnit, the permittee must make an q3plitmxion to x~n.~r=~ within 1~ days af the effective dam of this Ordinance. Section S. Severehilly. ff any provisions of ~-~ Orfl~=n~e or ~ ~~on · c~f wny ~ or ~,m~n~ h ~ ~d, ~ ~~ ~ not ~ o~ pwvisions or ~m~, ~d w thi~ ~d, ~c pw~ d ~ ~~ ~ ~ w ~ ~vcmblc. ~:~'~'TA~PC: 11/29J93 Idle 9 Section 6. This OrrJir~n~ shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The ~ Clerk: _.h:11 cetd~ tO the adoptlop of ttlb Orrih',2nre add cause copies Of this Ordin~ce to be posted and peb.-.hed as mqttitmt by law. A'IuJ~'J.': June S. Gteek, C..by C3=k [SEAL] STATE OF CALn:O~ ) coT. n, rrY OF ~E ) CrrYOFTSMr:C'In-A ) I, June S. GteeJc, City Clerk of the City of Ternecho., Ca/ifom~ do hereby ce~if'y that the fo~go~ng Otdiw. nCe No. 93-_ was duly intwduced and placed upon its first reading at 'a regular meeting.of the City Council on the day of , 1993, and that thel'~tfl~, said Ordi~senCe ~ dl~ ~ ~ pl.~sed ~t a ~ meew~g of the City Collnc:il of the City of Temecuh on the__ day of ,1993, by the fonowing mn call vote: COUNcTr-MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCTT-MEM3ERS: COUNTERS: ITEM NO. 15 /xT~PROV/xT. CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer February 22, 1994 Establishment of a Vehicle Impound Cost Recovery Fee RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABUSHING A VEHICLE IMPOUND COST RECOVERY FEE DISCUSSION: Section 22651 of the Califomia Vehicle Code authorizes the removal or tow of a vehicle by a police officer. The Temecula Police Department impounded approximately 1300 vehicles during the period of January 1,1993 through October 1 O, 1993. The towed vehicles account for traffic violations; driver's arrested for various criminal offenses, and vehicles towed for miscellaneous perking violations. The tow and subsequent release of a vehicle involves completion of an impound form; issuance of a case number; calling and waiting for the tow; data entry of vehicle information onto police and state computer systems; preparation of tow notices to the registered and legal owners of the vehicle; verification of valid driver's license, vehicle registration and ownership, and/or consent of owner for another person to operate the vehicle prior to release; preparation of the release and follow-up report; end verification of tow release. Effective January 1, 1994, cities are specifically authorized to charge fees to cover the administrative costs relating to the removal, impound, storage or release of impounded vehicles. AB 481, Chapter 614 Statutes 1993, added Section 22850.5 to the Vehicle Code which specifically authorizes the charging of these fees as long as the charges are reasonably and directly related to the provision of the service. However, the City of Temecula des not currently have a process for recovering these costs. The implementation of an administrative fee, which corresponds to the costs of the service, provides a cost recovery mechanism. The tow and release procedure requires administrative support from police officers, communications operators and public safety clerks. The average accumulated time spent on the tow and release is one hour. Administrative cost recovery is recommended for the following four circumstances in which a vehicle would be towed: When · vehicle is perked or left standing upon a highway for 72 or more hours in videtion of a local ordinance authorizing removal and after adequate warning has been posted on the vehicle. When a vehicle is found upon a highway, any public lands, or an off-street parking facility with a registration expiration date in excess of one year before the date it is found. Ce When an officer issues the driver of · vehicle a notice to appear for being unlicenssd or driving with · suspended license and there is no passenger in the vehicle who has a valid driver's license and authorization to operate the vehicle. When an officer arrests any pereon driving or in control of a vehicle for an alleged offense and the officer is, by this cede or other law, required or permitted to take, and does take, the person into custody. It should be noted that, Section 22852 of the Vehicle Cede provides the registered and legal owners of a towed vehicle the opportunity for · hearing to determine the validity of the vehicle storage resulting from the tow. If reasonable grounds are not established in the hearing, the Police Department is responsible for the administrative fee and tow charge. Currently, the owner of an impounded vehicle must have current registration, no outstanding parking citations, and a valid driver's license, prior to release. The administrative fee would be imposed prior to release. The fee would be collected at the same time that other outstanding charges are satisfied in conjunction with release of the vehicle. It is proposed that the City of Temecula impose a e45 fee to cover the administrative costs of impounding a vehicle. The fee would only be assessed on those vehicles whose owners had some degree of negligence. The City would reserve the right to waive the fee due to extenuating circumstances, such as the towing of a disabled vehicle. FISCAL IMPACT: A conservative estimate of the projected revenue is $45,000, based upon 1,000 impounded vehicles per year. RESOLUTION NO. 94- A IIE~~ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TE~ECULA EST~,nt-t,~m~TG A VEHICLE IMPOUND COST RECOVERY FEE WHEREAS, the Riverside County Sheziff's Depamnent, sting u the Temec,,is Police Deparunent i,n~mnds or stores numerous mi various vehicles from highways, public property, or private property, in the City of Tesneeula during the nomml course of duty; and WHEREAS, the Riverside County Sheriff's DepsUas2t sting ss the Teme~ds Police Depamaen~ i,mpounds or storm vehicles pursusnt ~o its suthority under Csliforah Vehicle Code secfiom 226.S0 through 22669; and WItEREAS, Vehicle Code Section 22850.5 added by Assembly bill 481, Chapter 614 Statutes of 1993, became effective lamsy 1, 1994, specifically attthorizing cities by ordinance or resolution to establish an adminisi~ai~ve charge relating to the removal, im!~.und, storage, or release or vehicles; and WHEREAS, stolen vehicle vic~m-~ should be exetnpt from service fees for im,notindment and release of stolen vehicles; and WHEREAS, situations may arise that warrant the exercise of prudent discretion ID forego or excuse the proposed service fee. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CrFY OF TBMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Pursuant W California Vehicle Code Section 22850.5, that the fee for this service charge shall be Forty-Five Dollars ($45.00) and fee shah be effective upon the adoption of this Resolution. Section 2. That victira~ of stolen vehicles shall be exempt from paying said service fees when their vehicles are released from impound. Section 3. That the Riverside County SherifFs Depamnent acting as the Temecula Police Department may in the exercise of its discretion forego or excuse the service fee when deemed appropriate. Section 4. That the City Manager is hereby amhorized to review and adjust said fee annually or as costs of services increase. Section S. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of ,1994. Ronald H. ~, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF ~ORNIA) COUNTY OF ~E) SS crrv I, tune S. Greek City Cleat of the City of Temeade, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 94-__ was duly ~ at a reSular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 22nd day of February, 1994, by the innowing mn can vom: COUNCILiiEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMt~ER3: lune S. Greek, City Clerk -ITEM 16 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning~;'~'' February 22, 1994 Amendment to Ordinance 348 to add a new section providing regulations to allow for a reduction in square footage to approved residential subdivisions RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff to prepare an Urgency Ordinance amending Ordinance 348 by adding a new section providing regulations to allow for a reduction of square footage and changes to elevations to approved residential subdivisions. BACKGROUND In the last month, there have been a number of proposals to downsize previously approved residential subdivisions. Coincidentally, the Planning Department has received numerous phone calls from property owners concerned about the impact these smaller homes may have on their property values. Currently, Ordinance 348 has no provisions for staff to regulate changes to approved subdivisions, with the exception of R-2 subdivisions. While staff recognizes the current economic climate and it's effect on the development communities efforts to market larger homes, we also recognize the potential impacts on existing homes. Staff feels a "downsizing" Ordinance may be a tool by which staff can assure that the new, smaller product types are compatible with existing residential units. FISCAL IMPACT None Attachments: R:~rAFI;]Le'r~DOWNS]ZE 2/3/94 Idb 1 ITEM 17 ~PPROV~T. CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Jim Wright CFD Division Chief February 22, 1994 Consideration of Recommendation Services Regarding County Ambulance PREPARED BY: City Clerk June S. Greek RECOMMENDATION: Support the County of Riverside pursuing ambulance services through the competitive bid process. BACKGROUND: you under separate cover. JSG The staff will finalize a staff report on this item and forward it to ITEM NO. 18 ~PPROVAT. CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Scott F. Field City Attorney DATE: February 22, 1994 SUBJECT: Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2 (PA93-0145) Roripaugh PREPARED BY: City Clerk June S. Greek RECOMMENDATION: Re-introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94.- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164, AMENDMENT NO. 2, (PLANNING APPLICATION 930145), LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD SO AS TO CHANGE "THE ZONING' FOR PLANNING AREA 7 FROM VERY HIGH RESIDENTIAL (20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (12 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), TO ADD A THREE (3) ACRE PARK TO PLANNING AREA 7, TO ADJUST THE BOUNDARIES BETWEEN PLANNING AREAS 7, 8 AND 9, AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 93-07 City Council Agenda Report Page Two Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 27827 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0144) LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD SO AS TO CREATE A 162 SINGLE FAMILY LOT SUBDIVISION PLUS A THREE (3) ACRE LOT FOR A PUBLIC PARK WITHIN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 167, PLANNING AREA NO. 7 AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 94-08 BACKGROUND: separate cover. Staff will finalize e staff report on this item end forward it to you under swj APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning DATE: February 22, 1994 SUBJECT: Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2 (PA93-0145) Roripaugh PREPARED BY: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Read by title only and re-introduce an Ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94-_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SPECIRC PLAN NO. 164, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD 2. Adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-._ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULAAPPROVING SPECIRC PLAN NO. 194, AMENDMENT NO. 2 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0145) LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD, CHANGING THE ZONING FOR PLANNING AREA 7 FROM VERY HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (12 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ADDING A THREE (3) ACRE PARK TO PLANNING AREA 7, ADJUSTING THE BOUNDARIES BETWEEN PLANNING AREAS 7, 8, AND 9, AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 94-07 R:~TAFFItPT~I45PA93.CC6 2/IN94 Idb 1 3. Adopt a Resolution entitled: RF~OLUTION NO. 94-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 27827 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0144) LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD, CREATING A 162 SINGLE FAMILY LOT SUBDIVISION PLUS A THREE (3) ACRE LOT FOR A PUBLIC PARK WITHIN SPECIRC PLAN NO. 164, PLANNING AREA NO. 7, AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 9408. BACKGROUND: The City Council completed the public hearing process on Amendment No. 2 to Specific Plan No. 164 (Roripeugh) on January 25, 1994. At that meeting, the City Council made various changes to the Specific Plan Amendment, including determining that Planning Area 8 remain Office (i.e., office with limited commercial uses). However, because the General Plan designation for planning Area 8 was a medium density residential, it was Staff's recommendation that the property be rezoned to low-density residential as a "holding" zone. A General Plan amendment would then be processed to change the land use designation of Planning Area 8 to Professional Office and the property would then be rezoned to Office after the General Plan Amendment was complete. At the conclusion of the hearing, Council introduced an Ordinance and adopted a Resolution to approve the Specific Plan Amendment. The Council also adopted a Resolution to approve the Tentative Tract Map for Planning Area 7. Finally, the Council directed that the City and Roripaugh enter into a Memorandum of Understanding providing that the City would initiate and Roripaugh would support a General Plan Amendment for Planning Area No. 8 to redesignate it as a Professional Office, and that Roripaugh would process a Specific Plan Amendment to reflect this General Plan revision. DISCUSSION: After further consideration end discussion with the applicant, Staff has concluded that rather than amending Planning Area 8 from Office to Low Density Residential, and then amending it back to Office, it would be preferable to take no action regarding Planning Area 8. This would result in the zoning remaining Office. The City would then process a General Plan Amendment to revise the Land Use Designation from Medium Density Residential to Professional Office. Accordingly, it is necessary for the Council to reintroduce a new Ordinance reflecting this change. In addition, there were other revisions made at the City Council hearing to the Resolutions approving the Specific Plan and approving the Tentative Tract Map that were not reflected in the Resolutions which were adopted. Consequently, it is requested that the Council adopt new resolutions to incorporate all the changes made at the January 25, 1994 City Council hearing. R:~TAImlm!PI~i4~PA93.CC6 2/1~94 ldb 2 FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance No. 94-_- Page 4 2. Resolution No. 94-_- Page 17 3. Resolution No. 94-_- Page 21 R:~STAFFRP~I4~PA93.CC6 2~1b~4 Idb 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 94.- R:~TAFFB~'~I4SPA93.CC6 2/INN Idb 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 94-_ AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF T~!ECULA ADOPTING IAND DEVn O~ STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164, LOCATED ON THr. NOR'lIIWi~qT CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL K~.4d/NY ROAD CITY COUNCIL OF THF~ CITY OF 'rD/IECI_I~, STATE OF C~LWO~, DOES ORDAIN AS FOllOWS: Section 1. The official zoning map of the City of Temecula, entitled "Temecula/Rancho California Area" as adopted pursuant to Section 34 of Ordinance No. 90- 04, is amended as shown which map is w~_t~- a part of this ordinance. Section 2. Article X'VIIa of Ordinance No. 348, as adopted by reference pursuant to Ordinance 9004, is mended by n_d_dipg thereto a Ile-w Section 17.46 to read as follows: Section 17.46 SP ZONE REQ~, AND STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164. a. Planning~ Area 1. (1) The uses permitted in Planning Area I of Specific Plan No. 164 shah be the same as those uses permitted in Article VI, Section 6.1 of Ordinance No. 348. (2) The developmoat standards for Planning Area I of Specific Plan No. 164 shah be the same as those standards identified in Article VI, Section 6.2 of Ordinance no. 348, except that the development standards set froth in Article VI, Section 6.2(a), Co), (c), (d), and (e)(1), (2), and (3) shall be deleted and replaced by the following: A. Bulkling height shall not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of thirty-five feet (35'). B. Lot area shall be not less than ten thousand (10,000) square feet. The minimum lot area shall be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely for access to the pertion of a lot used as a building site. C. The minimum average width of that pertion of a lot to be used as a building site shah be seventy feet (70') with a minimum average depth of one hundred feet (100'). That portion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots shall have a minimum width of twenty feet (20'). D. The minim.m frontage of a lot shall be seventy feet GO'), except that lots fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage ofthirty feet (30'). R:~qTAFFRP~I4~PA93.CC6 2/18/94 E. The front yard shall be not less than twenty-five feet (25'), measured from the existing street line or from any future street line as shown in any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed ~. F. Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than ten feet (10'). Side yards on corner and reverse comer lots shall be not less than twenty-five feet (25') from the existing street line or from any future street line as shown on any Specific Phn of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed smumn~, upon which the main building sides, except that where the lot is less than fifty feet (50') wide the yard need not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the width of the lot. G. The rear yard shall not be less than twenty feet (20'). In addition, the following standards shall also apply: AA. No lot shall have more than twenty-five percent (25 % ) of its net area covered by Buildings or structures. the curb. BB. No garage shall be situated closer than thirty feet (30') from the face of (3) Except as provided above, all other zOning requil~ements shall be the same as those requirements identified in Article V1 of Onfinance No. 348. b. Planning Area 2. (1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 2 of Specific Plan No. 164 shah be the same as those uses permitted in Article VI, Section 6.1 of Ordinance No. 348. (2) The development standards for Planning Area 2 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the same as those standanis identified in Article VI, Section 6.2 of Oxdinance No. 348, except that the development standards set forth in Article VI, Section 6.2(a), Co), (c), (d), and (e)(1) and (2) shall be deleted and replaced by the following: A. Building height shall not exceed two stories, with a ma~mum height of thirty-five feet (35'). B. Lot area shall be not less than four thousand (4,000) square feet. The minimum lot area shall be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site. C. The minimum average width of that portion of a lot to be used as a building site shall he thirty-five feet 05') with a minimum average depth of eighty feet (80'). That portion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots shall have a minimum width of twenty feet (20'). R:~-~TAFPIP~14~PA93.CC6 ~1~1. Mb 6 D. The minimum fT0fltage Of a lot shall be forty feet (40'), except that lots fronting on knuckles or cud-de-sacs may have a minimum ffonl3go Of thiwty feet (30'). B. The front yard shall be not less than thirty feet (30'), measured from the existing street line or from any fiau~ street line as shown in any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure. F. Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than five feet (5'). However, if a zero lot line design is utilized, the alternate side yard may not be less than ten feet (10'). Side yards on comer and reverse comer lots shall be not less than ten feet (10') from the existing street line or from any future street line as ~hown on any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure, upon which the main building sides, except that where the lot is less than fifty feet (50') wide, the yard need not exceed twenty percent (20%) Of the lot. In adch'~on, the following standard shah also apply: AA. No lot shall have more than sixty percent (60%) Of its net area covered by buildings or structures. (3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shah be the same as those requirements identified in Attictc VI of Ordinance No. 348. c. Planning ,Area 3. (1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 3 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the same as those uses permitted in Article VI, Section 6.1 or Ordimnce No. 348. (2) The development standards for Planning Area 3 of Specific plan No. 164 shah be the same as those sUtndards identified in Article VI, Section 6.2 of Ordinance No. 348, except that the development standards set forth in Article VI, Section 6.2(a), Co), (c), (d), and (e)(1) and (2) shall be deleted and replaced by the following: A. Building height shah not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of thirty-five feet (35'). B. Lot area shah be not less than four thousand (4,000) square feet. The minimum lot area shah be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site. C. The minimum average width of that portion Of a lot to be used as a building site shall be thirty-five feet (35') with a minimum average depth Of eighty feet (80,). That potlion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots slmH have a minimum width of twenty feet (20'). D. The minimum frontage of a lot shah be forty feet (40'), except that lots fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30'). R:~TAFPRPT%I45PA93.CC6 2/18/94 kJb 7 B. The front yard shall be not less than thixty feet (30'), measured from the existing street line or from any future street line as shown in any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure. F. Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than five feet (5'). However, if a zero lot line design is utilized, the ~ltertmte side yard my not be less than ten feet (10'). Side yards on corner and reverse comer lots shah be not less than ten feet (10') form the existing street line or from any future street line as shown on any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structnre, upon which the main building sides, except that where the lot is less than fifty feet (50') wide, the yard need not exceed twenty peacent (20 ~) of the width of the lot. In addition, the following standard shall also apply: AA. No lot shall have more than sixty percent (6(} % ) of its net area covered buildings or structures. O) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirtm~ents shall be the same as those requirements identified in Article VI of Ordinnnce No. 348. d. Pinnning Area 4. (1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 4 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the same as those uses perufitted in Article VI, Section 6.1 of Ordinauce No. 384. (2) The development standards for Planning Area 4 of Specific Plan No. 164 shah be the same as those standards identified in Axticle VI, Section 6.2 of Ordinance No. 348, except that the development standards set foxth in Article VI, Section 6.2(a), Co), (c), (d), and (e)(1) and (2) shah be deleted and replaced by the following: A. Building height shall not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of thirty-five feet (35'). B. Lot area shall be not less than four thousand (4,000) square feet. The minimum lot area shall be 'determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site. C. The minimum average width of that portion of a lot to be used as a building site shah be thirty-five feet (35') with a minimum average depth of eighty feet (80'). That portion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots shall have a minimum width of twenty feet (20'). D. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be forty feet (40'), except that lots fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs my have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30'). R:~STAIq311v~I45PA93.CC6 2/1~/94 Idb 8 E. The front yard shall be not less than thirty feet 00'), measured from the existing street line or from any future street line as shown in any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure. F. Side yards on interior and through lots shah be not less than five feet (5'). However, ff a zero lot lille design is i/tillved, the -Itemsto side yard my not be less than ten feet (10'). Side yards on corn~ and reverse corner lots shall be not less than ten feet (10') from the existing sum line or from any future street line as shown on any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure, upon which the main building sides, except that where the lot is less than fifty feet (50') wide, the yard need not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the width of the lot. In addition, the following standard shah also apply: AA. No lot slual have more than sixty percest (60 ~ ) of its net area covered by buildings or strucmx~. (3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shah he the same as those requirements identified in Article VI of Ordinance No. 348. e. Phnnin~ Area 5. (1) The uses permitted in Planning Area S of Specific Phn No. 164 shall be the same as those uses permiRed in Article VI, Section 6.1 of Ordinance No. 348. (2) The development standards for Planning Area S of Specific 'Plan No. 164 shall be the same as those standards identifiM in Article VI, Section 6.2 of Ordinance No. 348, except that the development standards set forth in Article VI, Section 6.2(a), (b), (c), (d), and (e)(1) and (2) shall be deleted and replaced by the following: A. Building height shall not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of thirty-five feet 05'). B. Lot area shall be not less than four thousand (4,000) square feet. The minimum lot area shall be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely for access to the portion of a lot used as a buikling site. C. The minimum average width of that portion of a lot'W be used as a building site shall he thirty-five feet 05') with a minimum average depth of eighty feet (80'). That portion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots shall have a miniroBin width of twellty feet (20'). · D. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be forty feet (40'), e0tcept that lots fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30'). R:~rAF!qtPT~I4$PA93.CC6 2/18/~kt kb 9 the existing street line or from any future street line as shown in any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure. F. Side yards on interior and tixmgh lots shall be not less than five feet (5'). However, if a zero-lot line design is u~li~, the alteax~ side yard may not be less than ten feet (10'). Side yards on corner and reverse comer lots shall be.not less than ten feet (10') from the existing street line or from nay future street line as shown on nay Specific plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure, upon which the mnin bui/ding sides, ncg~ that where the lot is bss than fifty feet (50') wide, the yard need not exceed twenty percent (20 % ) of the width of the lot. In addition, the following standard shall also apply: AA. No lot shah have more than sixty pereem (60%) of its net area covered by buildings or covered by buildings or structures. 0) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shah be the same as those requirements identified in Article VI of Ordinance No. 348. f. Fianninr Area 6. (1) The uses ponnitted in Ptnnning Area 6 of Specific Plan 'No. 164 shall be the same as those uses permitted in Article VI, Section 6.1 of Ordinance No. 348. (2) The development standards for Planning Area 6 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the same as those sUmdards identified in Article VI, Section 6.2 of Oxdinance No. 348, except that the development standards set forth in Article VI, Section 6.2(a), Co), (c), (d), and (e)(1) and (2) shall be deleted and replaced by the following: A. Building height shah not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of thirty-five feet (35'). B. Lot area shall be not less than four thousand (4,000) square feet. The minimum lot area shall be detez~ined by excluding that portion of a lot that is a used solely for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site. C. The minimum average width of that portion of a lot to be used as a building site shall be thirty-five feet (35') with a minimum average depth of eighty feet (80'). That portion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots shall have a miniqlum width of twenty feet (20'). D. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be forty feet (40'), except that lots fronting on knuckles or M-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30'). B. The front' yard shah be not less than thirty feet (30'), measured from the existing street line or from any future street line as shown in nay Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure. R:WrAFFRPT~!4SPA93.CC6 2/18/94 Idb '10 F. Side yards on interior and through lots shah be not less than five feet (5'). However, if a zero-lot line design is utiliT_sl, the alternate side yard may not be less than ten feet (10'). Side yards on comer and reverse comer lots shah be not less than ten feet (10') from the existing street line or from any future street line as shown on any specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure, upon which the main building sides, except that where the lot is less than fifty feet (50') wide, the yard need not exceed twenty percent (20~) of the width of the lot. In addition, the following standard shah also apply: AA. No lot shall have more than sixty l~i~zat (60 ~ ) of its net area covered by buildings or stmctuw~. (3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as those requirements identified in Arlicle VI of OMinance No. 348. g. Phnning Area 7. (1) The uses perufitted in Planning Area 7 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be single family residentlnl and park. (2) The development standards for Planning Area 7 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be as follows: A. Building height shah not exc, oed two stories, with a maximum height of thirty-five feet (35'). square feet. Lot area shah be not less than Three Thousand Four Hundred O, 400) C. The minimum width of a lot shall be Forty feet (40') and the minimum depth shah be Eight-Five feet (85'). D. The .minimum frontage of a lot shall be forty feet (40'), except that lots fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of Fifteen feet (15'). E. Minimum yard requirements area as follows: (1) The front yard shall be not less than Ten feet (10'), measured from the front property line. (2) Skic yards on interior and through lots shall be not tess than Five feet (5'). However, if a zero-lot line design is utili74~d, the altorllate side yard may not be less than Ten feet (10') from the existing side property line. (3) The rear yard shall not be less than Five feet (5'). R:~TAFFRPT%i4.SPA93.CC6 2/11/94 klb '[ '[ (4) Pool sefosc~ shall be 3 feet for side yard and 3 feet for rear Patio cover .selbach shah be 3 feet. for side yard and 3 feet for (6) Room/h~lding additions shall adhere to the same setback requirements as those of the main structures. (7) Yard Encroachmerits. Where yards are required by this ordinance, they shah be open and tmobsmsaed from the ground to the sky and kept free of all structural oncro~chments, except as follows: a. Outside stairways or landing places, ff unroofed and unenclosed, may extend into a required side yard for a digance of not exceed three (3) feet and/or inW the required rear yard a distance of not to exceed five (5) feet. b. Cornices, canopies, and other similar architectural features not providing additional floor space within time building may extend into a required yard not to exceed one (1) foot. Eaves may extend three (3) feet to a required yard. One (1) pergob or one (1) covered but unenclosed passenger landing may extend into either side yard provided it does not reduce the side yard below five (5) feet and its depth does not exceed twenty (20) feet. dwelling unit. Automobile paridng shah provide one (1) two car garage per each (3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shah be the same as those requirements identified in Ordinance No. 348. h. Pismning Area 8. (1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 8 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be single family residential. (2) The development standards for Planning Area 8 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be as follows: A. Building height shall not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of thirty-five feet (35'). B. Lot area shall be not less than Ten Thousand (10,000) square feet. C. The minimum width of a lot shall be Eighty feet (80') and the minimum depth shah be One hundred twenty five feet (12S'). R:~TAFFR.P~145PA93.CC6 ~/18/94, ldb 'J 2 D. The minimum frontage of a lot shah be Eighty feet (80'), except that lots fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of Twenty feet (20'). B. Minimum yard requirements area as fonows: (1) The front yard shall be not less than Twenty feet (20'), measured from the front property line. (2) Side yards on interior and through lots shah be not less than Five feet (5'). However, if a zero-lot line design is utilized, the alternate side yard may not be less than Ten feet (10') from the existing side property line. (3) The rear yard shah not be less than Twenty feet (20'). 1>ool setbacks shah be 3 feet for side yard and 3 feet for rear (s) Patio cover setb~ct~ shall be 3 feet for side yard and 3 feet for (6) Room/building additions shall adhere to the same setback requirements as those of the main structures. all structural encroachmen[s, except as follows: a. Outside stairways or landing places, if unroofed and uncnclosed, may extend into a required side yard for a distance of not exceed three (3) feet and/or into the required rear yard a distance of not to exceed five (5) feet. b. Cornices, canopies, and other similar architectural features not providing additional floor space within the building may extend into a r~luired yard not to exceed one (1) foot. Eaves my extend three (3) feet to a required yard. One (1) pergola or one (1) covered but unenclosed passenger landing may extend into either side yard provided it does not reduce the side yard below five (5) feet and its de~ does not exceed twenty (20) feet. Fm dwelling unit. Automobile parlclng shall provide one (1) two car garage per each (3) Except as provided above, all other zoning Iequifemeat$ shall be the same as those requirements identified in Ordinance No. 348. R:~qTAFFRF~I45PA93.CC6 2/1g/94 ldb 13 i. PJann~nl, Anm 9. (Commerci~ 'B') (1) The uses permitted in Plantdug Area 9 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the same as those uses pexmittcd in Axticle IX, Section 9,1 of Ordinnnce NO. 348; except that the uses permit~ pursuant to Section 9.1(a)(1), (5), (6), (7), (9), (14), (15), (17), (22), (23), (28), (29), (35), (39), (42), (45), (48), (49), (50), (51), (53), (54), (59), (61), (66), (68), (69), (75), (77), (79), (80), (82), (84), (86), (89), (91), (92), and (93); and (b)(1), (3) through (8), (10) through (12), and (14) through (20) shah nat be permitted. In addition, the permittni uses iden~fied under Section 9.1 (a) shall also inclucle churches. (2) The dcwelopment standnxds for planning Area 9 of Specific Plan No. 164 sl~nl l be the same as those standards idend~ed in Article IX, Section 9.4 of Ordinance No. 348, except that the development standaM set forth in Article IX, Section 9.4(b) shah be deleted and replaced by the following: A. The front yard shnil be not less than twenty-five feet (25') and the rear yard shall be not less than twenty feet (20'). The front setback shah be measured from the specific plan street line. The rear setback shah be measured from the specific plan street line. The rear setback shall be mcasmu~ from the existing rear lot line or from any recorded alley or easement; if the rear line adjoins a street, the rear setback requirement shnll be the same as required for a front setback. B. There are no side yard requirments, except were the side yard abuts a resicleDtinlly zoned area, in which case buildings shah be set back twenty-five feet (25') from the side lot line. Bach side setback shall be meamx~ from the side lot line, or from the specific plan street line. In addition, the following standazds shall also apply: AA. No lot shall have more than fifty percent (50%) of its net area covered by buildings or structures. BB. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be twenty-five feet (25'). CC. The minimum average width of that portion of a lot to be used as a building site shah be twenty-five feet (25') with a minimum average depth of one hundred feet (100'). (3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as those requirements identified in Article IX of ~ No. 348. j. Plnnniqf Area 10. (Office) (1) The sues permitted in P18nning Area 10 of Specific Plan No. 164 shah be the. same as those uses permitted in Article IX, Section 9.1 of Onlin~ce No. 348, cxccpt that the uses permitted pursuant to Section 9.1(a)(1), (5), (6), (7), (9), (14), (15), (17), (22), (23), (28), (29), (35), (39), (42), (45), (48), (49), (50), (51), (53), (54), (59), (61), (66), R:~STAFFRPT~I4.SPA93.CC6 2/18/94 k]b 14 (68), (69), (75), (77), (79), (80), (82), (84), (86), (89), (91), (92), and (93); and Co)(1), (3) through (8), (10) through (12), and (14) through (20) shall not be peruitS. In addition, the permitted uses identified under Section 9.1 (a) shall also include churches. (2) The development sUmdards for Planning Area 10 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the same as tho~ ~ identified in Article IX, Section 9.4 of Ordinance No. 348, except that the development standard set forth in Article IX, Section 9.4Co) shall be deleted and replaced by the following: A. The front yard shall be not less than twenty-five feet (25') and the rear yard shall be not less than twenty feet (20'). The front setback shall be measured form the specific plan street line. The rear setback shall be measured from the existing rear lot line or from any recorded alley or easement; if the rear line adjoins a street, the rear setback requirement shall be file ~ame as required for a front setback. B. There are not side yard req~ents, except where the side yard abuts a residentially zoned area, in which case buildings shall be set back twenty-five feet (25') from the side lot line. Each side setback shall be measured from the side lot line, or from the specific plan street line. In addition, the following standards shall also apply: AA. No lot shall have more than fifty percent (50%) of its net area covered ~ by buildings or structures. BB. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be twenty-five feet (2~'). CC. The minimum average width of that portion of a lot to be used as a building site shall be twenty-five feet (25') with a minimum average depth of one hundred feet (100'). (3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requinnnents shah be the same as those requirements identified in Article IX of Ordinance No. 348. k. Plannin~ Area 11. (Natural Open Sl:mce) (1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 11 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the same as those uses permitted in Article VIIIe, Section 8,100 of Ordinance No. 348. In addition, the permitted uses identified under Section 8.100(a) shall also include undeveloped open space and public parks. (2) The development standards for Planning Area 11 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the same as those standards identified in Article VHIe. Section 8.101 of Ordinance No. 348. (3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as those requirements identified in Article VIIIc of Ordinance No. 348. R:XSTAFFRPr~I45PA93.CC6 ~l~l kJb 15 shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the offace of the City Clerk at least. five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a sl~mm=ry of this Ordiliallce, together with the names of the Coul~imembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. Section 4. PASSED, APP OVED, AND ADOPT!~ this __ day of ATTBST: RON ROBBRTS MAYOR June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALI~O~ COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITYOFTHMILr'ULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 9 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a xt%,ular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of , 1~.,_, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecuh on the day of , by the following roll call vote: AYKS: NOKS: ABSENT: COUN_Crr COUNCK,MnMBERS COUNCILMEMBERS rUN~S.G~ C1TYCT-nP, K R:~TAFPRFI~I45PA~3.CC6 2718~st kJb 'J 6 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 94- R:~STAPPRFI~I45PA93.CC6 2~18/94 klb '] 7 ~IXJTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF T~- CITY OF T]~4ECUIA APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164, AlViRNDI~qI~/T NO. 2 (PIANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-010) LOCATED ON THR NORTH WEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD, CHANGING TRY- ZONING FOR PIANNING AREA 7 FROM VERY ~tGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (20 DWRI-T -~NG UNITS PER ACRE) TO HIGH DENStrY RESIDENTIAL (12 DWR~ .IJNG UNITS PER ACRE), ADDING A TmtRR (3) ACRE PARK TO PLANNING AREA 7, ADJUSTING T~- BOUNDARIES Bs:'r~Vs:K,{ PLANNING AREAS 7, 8 AND 9, AND I~EPEALING RESOL~ON NO. 9407 WRRRR&S, Leo Rofipmgh filed PA93-0145 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHIi~,EAS, said Specific Plan Amendment application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local hw; WHRRP. JiS, the Planning Commission consi___da~! said Specific plan Amendment on November 1, 1993 at which time inte~ed persons had an ognmity to testify either in support or opposition; WH!~RJ,8, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended approval of said Specific Plan Amendment; WIIERR~kS, the City Council conducted public hearings pertaining to said Specific Plan Amendment on December 14, 1993, and January 2.5, 1994, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Specific Plan Amendment; WIlERE/kS, the City Council received a copy of the Commi,~sion proceedings and Staff Report regarding the Specific Plan Amendment; NOW, THRRRPORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THR CITY OF TIi~iECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS R:~STAFFRP~I45PA93.CC6 2/1V94 klb '[ 8 Seaion 1. FincliniC. The City Council in appmvinZ the proposed Specific Plan Amendment, makes the following findings: 1. The-project is annp__~_le with surrounding land uses of sinZle-family residential since it is separated by Nicolss Road and the Santa Gemudis Creek and impacts have been reduced to a level of in$i~mi~cance. 2. The proposed action is consistent with the City's General Plan. 3. The proposal win not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not repxesem a siZnificant change to the planned land use of the area, due to the fact that the proposed land use is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element and the overall density is being reduced. 4. The project will have a positive impact on the surrounding land uses since it is intnxiucing an additional new park to the area. Section 2. l~'~viro,,,.-e.:toi Comi,i~,.nee. A Inltisl Study was prepared for Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2 and Tentative Tract Ms.n No. 27827 and it revealed no signifi~ impaN that have not been mitigated to an insignificant level. Therefore, Staff recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration. The City Council has reviewed and considered the proposed Negative Declaration and comme~'rs received thereon and the Negative Declaration is hereby approved. Seaion 3. Conditiom. Amendment No. 2 (P-oxipauZh Estates) to Specific Plan No. 164 which is aUached as Bxhibit A, is hereby approved, subjea to the text of Amendment No. 2 being revised consistent with the instructions set forth in Exhibit B. The City HanninE Director shall determine if Amendment No. 2 has been revised consistent with Exhibit B. Section 4. This Resolution supersedes and replaces Resolution No. 9407. Seaion S. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. Section 6. PASSEB, APPROVEB AND ADOPTED this 1994. __dayof , ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] R:WrAFFRPI~I45PA93.CC6 2/18/94 STATE OF CAI-rI~ORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS. CrI'YOFTEMK'I,KA ) I HimtRy CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was ckdy adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on theday of ,1994, by the following vote of the Council: COUNCrLI~IBERS: NOF_~: COUN~EP~: COUNTERS: CITY Ct-n~K R:L~TA121rRP~I4~PA93.CC6 ~/18/94 ]LIb 20 EXHIBIT A RORIPAUGH SPECIFIC --AMENDMENT ESTATES PLAN N OI 2 PREPARED FOR: D AV/ED LP. PREPARED BY: Lohr + Associates Inc AUGUST 16.199:~ ~ L°hr+Ass°ciates lncJ. RORIPAUGH ESTATES SPECIFIC PLAN 164 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TABLE OF~ ITEM PAGE SUMMARY 1A LIMITS OF S.P.A. NO. 2 (EXHIBIT) 2A CIRCULATION ELEMENT (EXHIBIT) 3A ROADWAY CROSS-SECTIONS (EXHIBIT) 4A EQUESTRIAN TRAILS (EXHIBIT) 5A DEVELOPMENT PLAN/ZONING 12A DEVELOPMENT PLAN (EXHIBIT) 13A PLANNING AREA 7 28A PARKSITE LANDSCAPE (EXHIBIT) 28B PLANNING AREA 7 (EXHIBIT) 29A PLANNING AREA 8 30A PLANNING AREA 8 (EXHIBIT) 31A PLANNING AREA 9 32A PLANNING AREA 9 (EXHIBIT) 33A ORDINANCE NO. 348.3078 I StatUARY This second amendment to Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan No. 164 changes the land use for Planning Areas 7 & 8 from very high Density Residential and neighborhood Commercial to High Density Residential. It also adjusts the areas of these Planning Areas slightly reducing Planning Areas 8 & 9 and increasing Planning Area 7. Exhibit 2A shows the limits of Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 with respect to the overall Specific Plan. All other land uses and design standards as outlined in Amendment No. 1 of Specific Plan 164 as approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on Sept. 19, 1988 shall remain in effect. A three acre park has been included in P.A. 7. ~aximum densities of 243 DU and 121DU apply to P.A.~s 7 & 8 respectively with the provision for a density transfer to allow a total of 364 D.U. within the two planning areas. Modified street sections have been developed for local residential streets based on right of way widths of 46 feet and 50 feet. I- Z b.I Z Z C) j I l Jr .~ Z ,,I 0') U. I,- ,J ILl Z C~ bJ '~ Z ~ iAN"rA ROADWAY CROSS-SECTIONS It' I1' Ill' !Z° · =lu6ar~ aa~ '')'''' ......TYPICAL SECrlOAI 'E"EN T,ql i'fRET R:AAIAf!NG l~R~q 7 50' ,,r,jS' 16' 18' J 5' I3' "":. """'~"'~' ;~I c,,,, f MIIIE6tlI'E T~PICAL ~ECTIO&I R,B,C ~ i~ 57REET~ PL,qlt!!d!ld~ AREA 7 I',~ I 5" I=' i 16' I/OiIIILK SillIll R.C. PIIVEMENF REAitEFaII~E BR3E / """' ' ...... J ........... TYPfCRL SECTION. I~.~NNIN6 ',qRER 7. · . AMENDMENT NO. 2 F ORIPAUGH ESTATES DAV / ED, L.P. 4A ,EXHIBIT 2A · B Lohr+Associat.es IrK: 1.1.1 DEVELOPMENT PLAN A. LAND~SE DENSIT~ The Roripaugh Estates is a multiple-use development consisting of commercial, residential, open space, and park areas. Residential land use is further divided into sub-areas for more detailed land use type. The residential portion of the plan proposes a total of 803 dwelling units in a variety of product types. Planning Area 7 & 8 containing 23.6 acres and 10.1 acres respectively and are designated High Density Residential 7-12 D.U./AC.(Gross) A density transfer between Planning Area 7 & 8 shall be allowed for a total of 364 D.U.'s within those planning areas. 12A LIJ z 7. PLAIHIINC AREA 7: High Density ° Area: 23.6 Acres o Density: 12 D.U./AC. (Gross) ° Max No. of DU's: 243 o Permitted used: Detached single-family housing o Description: High Density residential bordered by Nicolas Road, Santa Gertrudes Creek, and High Density. ° Planning standards: - Access to Area 7 via Nicolas Road by dedicated roadways. - Grid Road and Alley Alignments. Class II Bike Trail along Nicolas Road (see Exhibits 4a and 15) 28A - Detached Housing types. - Landscape of proposed park site will be in accordance with Exhibit 8G-B. PaSe 28B. Density transfer between P.A. 7 & 8 shall allow for a total of 364 D.U. In the event that one of these planninS areas is developed at a lessor density the unused units shall be applied to the remaininS planning area. Product type and typical plottinS and front yard landscape plans shall be provided with the concurrent processinS of the tentative map. PAGE 2 OF 28A Z Z Z EXHIBIT "8G-B" ' 28B .. ?. 7. PLANNING AREA 8: HIGH DENSIT~ o Area: 10.1 Acres Density: 12 D.U./AC. (Gross) Maximum No. of DU's: 121 - or as otherwise allowed by the density transfer. ° Permitted uses: Attached/Detached housing. Description: High Density residential bordered by Nicolas Road, Santa Gertrudes Creek, High Density, residential and commercial. Planning standards: Access to Area 8 via Nicolas Road and Planning Area 9 to be determined at Plot Plan Phase consistent with Exhibit 8H-A. Class II Bike Trail along Nicolas Road (see Exhibits 4a and 15). - Attached/Detached housing. 30A Buffered from adjacent commercial site by 25 foot wide landscape strip. Density transfer between P.A. 7 & 8 shall allow for a total of 364 D.U. In the event that one of these planning areas is developed at a lessor density the unused units shall be applied-to the remaining planning area. PAGE 2 OF 3OA 'IIIIIIiti, /~' 'S'~!'17'1~I1tllttt, EQUESTRIAN TRAIL "" "' ~'o,Z',,,,,,,,, :',~,,, 1111111111, C ,q ~. ~. i?lllllllllll, g PLANNING AREA 8 9 F AREA 9 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL AREA 8 AREA 7 HIGH DENSITY ARTERIAL- HIGHWAY IIO'R.O.W. FUTI,[RE c=~ CCESS L SCALE I"= 200' ~,~,~,,~ N I C O AREA II PARK "B" BIKE TRAIL, (5'WIDTH) MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY AMENDMENT NO. 2 AREA DENSITY MAX. DENSITY MAX. NO. OF D.U.'S I0.1 AC. HIGH 12 D.U./AC., 121, DENSITY TRANSFER SHALL' BE ALLOWED BETWEEN P.A. 7 E~8 TO J~CHIEVE THE ASSIGNED 364 D.U. S RORIPAUGH ESTATES DAV / ED., LP. EXHIBIT 8'H-A 31A 9. PLANNING AREA 9: NEIGHKRH(X)DCON(IICIAL o Area: 20.18 acres Land Description: Commercial o Description: Commercial site backing onto Santa Gertrudes Creek. A local street provides access from intersection of Roripaugh Road and Nicolas. An in-out only access can be used from Winchester Road. The development bordered by Winchester Road to the north, Area 8 a commercial office site to the south, and a commercial site and Park "B" to the west of Nicolas Road. Planning Studies - Access to Nicolas Road via a local street and direct acces~ to Nicolas and in-out access"Off Winchester Road. - Buffered from adjacent project sites by landscape. - Class II Bike Trail along Nicolas Road. - Access shall be provided to P.A. 8 consistent with Exhibit 8I-A. 32A - Equestrian Trail along Santa Gertrudes Creek/open space/conservation area (see Exhibits 4B and 16). - Landscape standards for streets and slopes, see Details - Park "B" is across street (See Exhibit 21). PAGE 2 OF 32A PLANNING AREA 9 AREA 9 AREA 8 HIGH DENSITY ~.ARTERIAL GHWAY ,54' R.O.W. SCALE I"=,tO0' CLASS lr BIKE 'TRAIL ( 5' Wl DTH) AREA I0 COMMERCIAL ARTERIAL HIGHWAY I10' R.O.W. AREA 20, 18 AC, LAND USE . NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL LAND DESCRIPTION __COMMERCIAL AMENDMENT NO. 2 F OIRIPAUGH ESTATES DAV / ED ,. L.P. B, EXHIBIT 8I:-A Lohr+Associates Inc ORDINANCE NO. 348.3078 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF .TEMECULA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 348 RELATING TO ZONING g. Plannin~ Area 7: (1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 7 of Specific Plan No. 15~ shall be single family residential and park. (2) The development standards for Planning Area 7 of Specific Plan No. 16~ shall be as follows: A. BulldinE height shall not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of thirty-five feet (35'). B. Lot area shall be not less than Three Thousand Four Hundred (~ ~00) square feet C. The minimum width of a lot shall be Forty feet (~0') and the minimum depth shall be Eighty-Five feet (85'). D. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be forty feet (~O'),except chat lots froncing on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of Fifteen feet (15'). E. Ninimum yard requiremencs area as follows: (1) The front yard shall be not less than Ten feet (10'), measured from the front property line. (2) Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than Five feec (5'). However, if a zero-lot line design is utilized, ~he alternate side yard may not be less than Ten feet (10') from the existing side property line. (3) The rear yard shall not be less than Five feet (S'). (4) Pool setbacks shall be 3 feet for side yard and 3 feet for -rear yard {5) Patio cover setbacks shall be 3 feec for side yard and 3 feet for rear yard (6) Room/building additions shall adhere to the same setback requirements as chose of the main structures. (7) Yard Encroachments. Where yards are required by this ordinance. they shall be open and unobstructed from the ground to the sky and kept free of all structural encroacnments. except as follows: Outside stairways or landing places, if unroofed and unenclosed, may extend into a required side yard for a distance of not to exceed three (3) feet and/or into the required rear yard a distance of not to exceed five (5) feet. Cornices, canopies, and other similar architectural features not providing additional floor space within the building may extend into a required yard not to exceed one (1) foot. Eaves may extend three (3) feet into a required yard. One (1) pergola or one (1) covered but unenclosed passenger landing may extend into either side yard provided it does not reduce the side yard below five (5) feet and its depth does not exceed twenty (20) feet. II. F. Automobile parking shall provide one (i) two car garage per each dwelling unit. 3. Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as those requirements identified in Ordinance No. 3~8. G. Plannin~ Area 8: (1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 8 of Specific Plan 16~ shall be multi family residential. (2) The development standards for Planning Area 8 Of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be as follows: A. Building height shall not exceed three stories, with a maximum height of fifty feet (50'). B. Lot area shall be not less than 7200 square feet. The minimum lot are shall be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site. C. the minimum front and rear yards shall be twenty feet (20') for buildings that do not exceed one-story in height. Any building which exceeds one-story in height'shall be set back from the front and rear lot lines no less than twenty-five feet (25'). The front set back shall be measured from the front property line. The rear setback shall be measured from the existing rear lot line or from any recorded alley or easement; if the rear line adjoins a street, the rear setback requirement shall be the same as required for a front setback. D. The minimum side yard shall be fifteen feet (15') for buildings that do not exceed one-story in height. Any building which exceeds one- story in height shall be set back from each side lot line fifteen feet (15') plus five feet (5') for each additional story. If the side yard lII. F. Automobile parking shall provide one (1) two car garage per each dwelling unit. 3. Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as those requirements identified in Ordinance No. 348. G. PlanninR Area 8: (1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 8 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be multi family residential. (2) The development standards for Planning Area 8 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be as follows: A. Building height shall not exceed three stories, with a maximum height of fifty feet. (50'). B. Lot area shall be not less than 7200 square feet. The minim-m lot are shall be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site. C. The minimum front and rear yards shall be twenty feet (20') for buildings that do not exceed one-story in height. Any building which exceeds one-story in height shall be set back from the front and rear lot lines no less than twenty-five feet (25'). The front set back shall be measured from the front property line. The rear setback shall be measured from the existing rear lot line or from any recorded alley or easement; if the rear line adjoins a street, the rear setback requirement shall be the same as required for a front setback. D. The minimum side yard shall be fifteen feet (15') for buildings that do not exceed one-story in height. Any building which exceeds one- story in height shall be set back from each side lot line fifteen feet (15') plus five feet (5') for each additional story. If the side yard III. (15') plus five feet (5') for each additional story. If the side yard adjoins a street, the side setback requirement shall be the same as required for a front setback. E. No threesstory building shall be closer than twenty feet (20') to any other main building on the same lot and not two-story building shall be closer than fifteen feet (15') to any other main building on the same lot and no one-story building shall be closer than ten feet to any other main building on the same lot. F. LOT COVERAGE PERMITTED. In no case shall more than sixty (60) per cent of any lot be covered by buildings. G. Private open space requirements shall include 150 square feet for each dwelling unit located on the ground floor and 100 square feet for each dwelling unit located above the ground floor. H. Common Open Space - A three quarter acre site shall be provided for development of recreational amenities which may include basketball, volleyball, barbecue, picnic areas, tot lots and open lawn areas. I. Automobile parking: 1. Single Bedroom or studio dwelling unit: 1.25 spaces per dwelling unit. 2. Two bedroom dwellings: 2.25 spaces per dwelling unit. Such spaces shall be located within 200 feet of the building to be served by these spaces. 3. Three or more bedroom dwellings: 2.75 spaces per dwelling unit located within 200 feet of the building to be served by these spaces. J. Every main buildinS hereafter erected or structurally altered shall have a lot or BuildinS site Gross area of not less than twenty one hundred seventy eight {2,178)~square feet for each dwelling unit in such main building. C3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as those requirements identified in Ordinance No. 348. EXHIBIT B CHANGES TO ~MENT NO. 2 All refer~ to the de~,_~y transfer betwee~ Phnning Areas 7 and 8 shall be deleted. The total dweflln~ unit count for the specific plnn shall be updated to reflect the elimination of all mside~tl=l units in Planning Area 8. All exhibits and text shall be updated to reflect the correct zoning for Planning Area 8 as approved by City Council. R:~AASBHS~I45PA93.CHG ~17,~4 m ATTACHMENT NO. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 94- 1~:~TAFFRF~I4SPA93.OC6 2/1884. RF, SOLU'IION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ C1TY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 27827 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0144) LOCATED ON ~ NOR'tz!wF.~T CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD, CREATING A 162 SINGT-g FAMn.Y LOT SUBDIVISION PLUS A TH!t~'~, (3) ACRE LOT FOR A PUBLIC PARK WIT--IN S~C PLAN NO. 164, PLANNING Altg& NO. 7 AND ltEPF.,AT.rNG RESOLUTION NO. 94-08 WHEuE&S, Leo Roripaugh filed a request for PA93-0144 (Tentative Tract Map No. 27827) in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordin~ncn, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, the Planning Comml.e4ion considered said application on November 1, 1993 at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WIP.~EAS, at the conclusion of the Commi.~sion hearing, the Commi.~sion recommended approval of said application; W'It]Ei~AS, the City Council considered said application on December 14, 1993, and January 25, 1994, at which time interested persons had an oppommiW to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS~ at the conclusion of the Council hearing, the Council approved said application; NOW, Tm~gFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF TFIF~ CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RF.8OLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOrJOWS: Section 1. Findings. That the Teme~ia City Count! hereby makes the following findings: A. Purmmnt to Section 7.1 of Couuty 0txiinauce No. 460, no subdivisiou may be appmved uuless the following fmdiugs are made: specific plans. 2. That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. 3. That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the type of development. R:~qTAFI~I4SPA93.CC6 2/18794 klb 22 4. That the site of the proposed hncl division is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development. S. Tlmt the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are not likely to cause substnnfisl ellVirOnmelllBJ dalnage or subgantially and umvoidably injure 6. That the design of the proposed land division or the type of impwvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. 7. That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will not conflict with menU, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved ff it is found that alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantin!iy equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction. B. The Council in ~g the ~ project, makes the fortowing findings: 1. The proposed use or action as conditioned complies with State and Local Planning and Zoning Laws. 2. The propo~ action is consistent with the City's General Plan. 3. The Planning Commi.~sion has considered the effect of its action upon the housing needs of the region and has balanced these needs against the public service needs of the residents and available fiscal and environmental resources (Gov. Cod Section 66412.3) and finds that the project is consistent with the General Plan. Additionally, it will provide more diversity in the housing types avaihhle to the residents of the City of Temecuh. 4. The proposed project will not restfit in discharge of waste' into the existing sewer system that is in viol_n_~on of the requirements as set out in Section 13000 et see_. of the California Water Code since the project has been conditioned to comply with Bastern Municipal Water District's requirements. conditioned. The project has acceptable access by means of dedicated right-of-way as 6. The project is consistent with the intent of the original project approved by the County of Riverside. 7. The project is consistent with the provisions of Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2. R:~TAPFRPl~i45PA93.CC6 ~ll~ IrJb 23 8. Said Fhdings are supported by mimRes, maps, exhibits and environmental documents assochted with this application which are herein incorpont~ by rderence. Said documents arc referenced in the attached Staff Report, Exhibits, Bavironmel~al Assessment, and Conditions of Approval. Section 2. Environmental Compliance. A Initial Study was prepared for Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2 and Tentative Tract Msp No. 27827 and it revealed no significant impacts that have not been mitigated to an insignificant level. Therefore, Staff recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration. The City Council has w~riewed and considered the pwposed Negative Declaration and all comments received thereon and the Negative Declaration is hereby approved. Section 3. Conditiorm. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approved the said application subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto. Section 4. This Resolution supersedes and replaces Resolution NO. 94-08. Section S. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. Section 6. PASSED, APPROVEB AND ADOPTED this 1994. ATTBST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] R:~TAPFIP~14$PA~.CC6 ~/l~kt klb 24 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ClTYOI~TEVmCULA I ltlfltF2SY CERTIl~ that the f~ Resohstio~ was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a reEular meetin___~ thereof, held on the' day of ,1994, by the following vote of the Council: COUNCK/dBMBBRS: NOI~S: COUNt: COUNCH~iB/VIBERS: IUNES. GRE~ CITYCL~RK R:',,qTAFFRP~Id~PA9"J.CC6 2YLS/94 k~ 2[5 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. 93-0144 (Tentative Tract Map No. 27827) Project Description: A request to subdivide a 22.6 acre parcel into 162 single family dwelling lots and 8 three (3) acre open space lot for a public park (Rodpaugh Cottages) Assessofa Parcel No.: 911-150-035 and 911-150-038 Approval Date: January 25, 1994 Expiration Date: January 25, 1996 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Bght (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three Hundred Twenty-Eight Dollars ($1,328.00), which includes the One Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($1,250.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(2) plus the Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) County administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Requirements The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Tentative Tract Map No. 27827, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. R:~qTAFFRPT~I44PA93F.COA 2/14/94 k]b 1 If subdivision phasing is proposed, a phasing plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director. This project and all subsequent projects within this 'site shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2. 5 The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Development Agreement No. 37 or any restatements or amendments thereto. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655. A Mitigation Monitoring Program shall be submitted and approvad by the Planning Director prior to recordation of the Final Map or issuance of Grading Permits which ever occurs first. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Director. The plans shall include a note for dust control indicating: A. All active areas shall be watered at least twice a day. Non-toxic soil stabilizers shall be applied to all unpaved roads in grading and construction areas according to the manufacturer's specifications. Wheel washers shall be installed where vehicles exit unpaved areas into paved roads. All dirt hauling trucks shall be covered or they shall maintain at least two (2) feet of freeboard. 10. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. 11. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development, Prior to Recordation of the Final Map 12. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director: A. A copy of the Final Map B. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans R:~qTAFFRPI~I44PA93P.COA ~14/~t kit, 2 A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) with the following notes: (1) This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. (2) This project is within a 100 year flood hazard zone. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) (1) CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. The CC&R's shall include: (a) Uability insurance and methods of maintaining, :!!:-;:, extedor of all buildings, monument signs for the project, side yard landscaping, Nieeloo Ilood IPcrkwcy by the Home Owners Association. (Amended By Planning Commission on November 1, 1993). (b) Tho individual lot landoooping, tho wall along Nioolos Read, and tho oxtorior of tho buildingo oholl bo maintoinod by tho individual homoownoro. (Amended By Planning Commission on November 1, 1993). (c) The wall along Nicolas Road shall be maintained by the Home Owners Association paintad tho original oolor by tho individual homoownoro. (Amended By Planning Commission on November 1, 1993). (d) No parking shall be allowed on the driveways. (e) Roll-up garage doors shall always be used to replace the original garage doors for units with shared driveways. (f) The garage door openers and the lights on the buildings and the pole lighting that light the alleys shall be maintained and operational at all times. (Amended by City Council on January 25, 1994). (2) No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property ownsr's group or similar entity has been formed with the right to soeass d properlle individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development.' Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory R:~STAFFRFI~I44PA93F. COA 2/14/94 klb 3 membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelHng units and flexibility of -sseel:imnts to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and service. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City for proddoes required as Conddoes of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the city prior to making any such sale. This contrition shall net apply to land dedcetsd to the City for public purposes. (Amended By Planning Commission on November 1, 1993). (3) Every owner of a dwe~ing unit-or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association owning the common areas and facilities. (Amended By Planning Commission on November 1, 1993). The project shall be consistent with the requirements of the French Valley Airport Plan when the plan is adopted, The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development, Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 13. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director: A. Construction landscape plans consistent with the following: (1) City Standards. (2) The approved Typical Conceptual Landscape Plans. (3) Automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas. (4) Complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from the view of the public from streets and adjacent property. (5) Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots prior to issuance of the first building permits within each of the phases of the Final Map, (6) Change the California Sycamore in the Nicolas Road Conceptual Plans to London Plane Tree. B, Wall and fence plans consistent with the following: (1) All walls and fences shall be a minimum of six (6) feet measured from the highest grade or as otherwise specified below. (2) A six foot six inch (6' 6") high decorative block wall or a combination decorative block wall and berming (measured from the finished pad R:~3TAFPRP~l,I,IPA93F.COA 2/14/94 kib 4 14. elevation) shall be constructed on the mar property lines for lots 1 through 22, 103, 104 and 162, and on the side property lines for lots 1, 22, 103 and 162. These walls shall have a surface density of at least 3.5 pounds per square foot, and shall have no openings or cracks (Refer to Preliminary Noise Analysis prepared by Mestra Grave Associates, August 11, 1993). (3) Decorative block walls shall be required for the side yards for corner lots and along the western property line (lots 103 through 121 ). (4) Wrought iron, decorative block or wrought iron combination wallsshall be required to take advantage of views for rear yards along the northerly property line (lots 121 through 154) and lots 155 through 162 and the side yard for lot 154. (5) Wood fencing shall be used for all side and rear yard fencing when not restricted by (b), (c) and (d) above. (6) Tho wall along Nioolos Read oholl bo oonotruotod ontiroly, inoluding tho footingo, within tho individual icto or, d not within tho publio right of ~':.¥. (Amended By Planning Commission on November 1, 1993). Precise grading plans including all structural setback measurements consistent with the approved rough grading plans and the approved plottings. Elevations, floor plans and colors and materials consistent with the approved plans. E. The Model Home Complex Plot Plan (if applicable) which includes the following: (1) Site Plan with off-street perking (2) Construction Landscape Plans (3) Fencing Plans (4) Building Elevations A Noise Analysis shall be submitted for review and approval for the interior spaces within the project. The maximum interior noise level shall be 45 CNEL. Ge The pole end light standards for the alleys. (Added by City Coundl on January 25, 1994). Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision; however, solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Director approval. R:~STAFIaRPT~i44PA93F. COA 2/14/N Idb 5 15. The applicant shall demonstrate by a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. Pdor to luuance of Occupancy Permits 16. If deemed necessary by the Planning Director, the applicant shall provide additional landscaping to effectively screen various components of the project. 17. Front yard and slope landscaping and all fencing within individual lots shall be completed for inspection. 18. All the Conditions of Approval shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the Directors of Planning, Public Works, Community Services and Building and Safety. 19. Roll-up garage doors with automatic garage door openers shall be provided for units with shared driveways. Automatic garage door openers shall be provided for all units. 20. The wall and the associated landscaping along Nicolas Road shall be installed prior to issuance of the first occupancy permit within each of the phases of the Final Map that front Nicolas Road. 21. The monument signs for the project shall be maintained by the Home Owners Association opplioont and ohall bo romovod, if within right of way, prior to ioouonoo of tho Ioet final roloaoo of tho projoot. (Amended By Planning Commission on November 1, 1993). 22. All pole lighting in the alleys shall be installed pdor to issuance of the first occupancy permit of any building in that alley. (Added by City Coundl on January 25, 1994). 23. All potential home owners shall be prodded with a copy of the White Report containing all pertinent information prior to the purchase of each home. (Added by City Council on January 25, 1994). 24. The applicant shall demonstrate by a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of Public Works. General Requirements R:~TAPPiFrXI44PAgZF.COA 2/14/94 IrJb 6 25. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the Tentative Tract Map all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 26. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including ell on-site flat work and improvements) grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right- of-way. 27. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works.prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 28. All 'improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. 29. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 30. A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations shell be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for approval prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of any permit. A permit from Riverside County Rood Control and Water Conservation District is required for work within their Right-of-Way. 31. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, City Standards, and as additionally required in these Conditions of Approval. 32. All lot drainage shall be directed to the driveway and/or the alley by side yard drainage swales independent of any other lot. 33. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 34. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed with the Regional Water Quality Control Board or the project is shown to be exempt from that agency. R:~TAFPRF~I44PA93F.COA 2/14/94 klb 7 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: · · · · · · · · · Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region; Riverside 'County Flood Control and Water Conservation Planning Department; Department of Public Works; Riverside County Health Department; Community Services District (TCSD); General Telephone; Southern California Edison Company; and Southern California Gas Company. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. An Erosion Control Plan in accordance with City Standards, shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed free condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Department of Public Works. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District prior to issuance of any permit. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or easements for any off- site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works at no cost to any agency. The Developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the Developer shall provide adequate facilities as approved by the Department of Public Works. R:~TAPPRPT~I44PA93F.COA 2/14~ IrJb 8 43. The Developer shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing facilities or by securing a drainage easement. A Rood Plain Development Permit and Drainage Study shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The drainage study shall include, but not be limited to, the following criteria: Drainage and flood protection facilities which will protect all structures by diverting site runoff to streets or approved storm drain facilities as directed by the Department of Public Works. Adequate provision shall be made for the acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. The impact to the site from any flood zone as shown on the FEMA flood hazard map and any necessary mitigation to protect the site. D. Identify and mitigate impacts of grading to any adjacent floodway. 45. The location of existing and post development 100-year floodplain and floodway shall be shown on the improvement plan. The site is in an area identified on the Rood Hazard Maps as Flood Zone "A" and is subject to flooding of undetermined depths. Prior to the approval of any plans, this project shall comply with Ordinance No. 91-12 'of the City of Temecula, and with the rules and regulations of FEMA for development within Rood Zone "A', which may include obtaining a letter of map revision from FEMA. 46. The following storm drain facilities shall be provided along with the facilities as shown on the Tentative Map. The requirement for the underground facilities is to mitigate the surface runoff onto Nicolas Road, the potential maintenance of the nuisance runoff created by this development, and negate the provision of additional drainage facilities downstream since Assessment District 161 did not accommodate this development's proposed runoff in sizing the downstream drainage facilities. Catch basins shall be installed at the intersection of "G" Street and Nicholas Road to eliminate the cross gutter. The site shall be designed to minimize the contributory onsite runoff to Nicolas Road at "A' Street by providing additional catch basins and storm drain pipes or by redesigning the grades near the intersection of Nicolas Road and 'A' Street. Prior to the Issuance of Encroachment Permits 47. All conditions of the grading permit and encroachment permit shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department. R:~I'APFRP~I44PA931a,COA 2/14~Jk~ Idb 9 48. 49. 50. Improvement plans, including but not limited to, streets, parkway trees, street lights, driveways, drive aisles, parking lot lighting, drainage facilities and paving shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer on 24" x 36" mylar sheets and approved by the Department of Public Works, Final plans (and profiles on streets) shall show the location of existing utility facilities and easements as directed by the Department of Public Works, The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans to be submitted to the Department of Public Works: Flowline grades shall be 0,5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum.over A.C. paving. Sm Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos, 207, 207A, and 208. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with Ordinance No. 461 and shall be shown on the improvement plans as directed by the Department of Public Works. Spacing of pole lights in the alleys shall be determined by the City Engineer. (Amended by City Council on January 25, 1994). 5 foot wide concrete sidewalks shall be constructed per City Standard Nos. 400 and 401 specifications, Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries or as otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works. Gm Minimum centerline radii shall be in accordance with City Standard No. 113 or - as otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works. All reverse curves shall include a 100-foot minimum tangent section or as otherwise approvad by the Department of Public Works. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as approved bY the Department of Public Works. J. All units shall be provided with zero clearance garage doors. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through under-sidewalk drains. All driveways shall be located a minimum of 2 foot from the side property line unless otherwise provided for with a joint use easement for ingress/egress. R:~TAFI~I44PA93F.COA %/14/9w{. kJb 10 51. In order for the City to agree to accept and maintain the proposed alleys, they shall be subject to the following conditions: · The alleys shall be concrete paved. · No utilities shall be installed within the alleys. Parking shall not be permitted along the alleys on trash and sweeping days and they shall be signed accordingly. (Amended by the City Coundl on January 25, 1994). Lights shall be installed on each garage and/or every house. The Developer shall file an application with TCSD for inclusion of the alleys within Service Level 'R' to provide for the maintenance of the alleys. 52. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence. 53. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground. 54. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be deigned by a registered Civil Engineer and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. 55. The stop bar at the southbound Warbler Circle approach shall be positioned five (5) feet from Nicolas Road curb line, 56. All required fees shall be paid. Prior to Recordation of Find Map 57. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid. 58. The Developer shall construct or post secudty and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the construction of the following public/private improvements within 18 months in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. Street improvements, which may include, but are not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, alley pole lights, signing, traffic signals and other traffic control devices as appropriate. (Amended by City Coundl on January 25, 1994.). B. Storm drain facilities. C. Landscaping (slopes and parkways). R:~qTAFFRP~I44PA93F.COA 2/14/94 k]b 1 I D. Erosion control and slope protection. ~-~ 59. 60. 61. 62. E. Sewer and domestic water systems. F. Undergrounding of proposed utility distribution lines. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board; Rancho California Water District; Eastern Municipal Water District; Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; City of Temecula Fire Bureau; Planning Department; Department of Public Works; Riverside County Health Department; Cable TV Franchise; Community Services District; General Telephone; Southern California Edison Company; Southern California Gas Company; Department of Fish and Game; and Army Corps of Engineers. All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. A utility maintenance easement in favor of the Home Owners Association shall be recorded in conjunction with the recordation of the Final Map over the twenty (20) Foot alleys and five (5) feet on either side of the alleys. (Added by City Courtall on January 25, 1994). The draft Circulation Element of the proposed General Plan calls for an 18 foot wide raised landscaped. median along Nicolas Road per City Standard No. 100. Consequently, should Assessment District (AD) 1 61 not construct the median, the Developer shall be required to construct the median along the property frontage or pay the fair share cost of the improvements in lieu of construction of the improvements to provide for the raised landscaped median par City Standard No. 100. In the event that the Developer constructs the median, it shall accommodate a left turn pocket into Roripsugh Road. The median shall be continuous at "A' Street to restrict access to right turn in/out movement if the it is to remain at its currently designed location. The median shall also be designed to accommodate a 150 foot left turn pocket into Warbler Circle and "G" Entry Street and "D" Street and Nicolas Road should the Developer choose to relocate the access to that location. If the median is not constructed, the Developer shall accommodate the above by striping accordingly. R:~TAPFRF~144PA93P.COA 2/14/9,4 Idb 12 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. Sufficient right-of-way along "G" Entry Street shall be dedicated for public use to provide for a 60 foot full width right-of-way and shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter located 18 feet on both sides of the centerline and 36 feet of asphalt concrete pavement, or post bonds for the street improvements, as determined by the Department of Public Works. Sufficient right-of-way along "A", "B", "C", and the remainder of "G" Street shall be dedicated for public use to provide for a 50 foot full width right-of-way including the standard knuckle, and shell be improved with concrete curb and gutter located 18 feet on both sides of the centerline and 36 feet of asphalt concrete pavement, or post bonds for the street improvements, as determined by the Department of Public Works. Sufficient right-of-way along "D" , · E" , and · F" Streets shall be dedicated for public use to provide for a 46 foot full width right-of-way and shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter located 16 feet on both sides of the centerline and 32 feet of asphalt concrete pavement, or post bonds for the street improvements, as determined by the Department of Public Works. Sufficient right-of-way along the Alleys shall be dedicated for public use to provide for a 20 foot full width right-of-way and the entire width shall be improved with concrete pavement, or post bonds for the alley improvements, as determined by the Department of Public Works. The Developer shall file an application with TCSD for inclusion of the alleys within Service Level 'R' to provide for the maintenance of the alleys. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805. The Developer shall make a good faith effort .to acquire the required off-site property interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the Developer shall, prior to submittal of the final map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the Developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the Developer, at the Developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. Vehicular access shall be restricted on Nicolas Road and so noted on the Final Map as approved by the Department of Public Works. A Signing and Striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works for Nicholas Road and shall 'be included in the street improvement plans. Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact the Department of Public Works for the design requirements. R:~TAFI~I~MI,AJJF.COA 2/14/94 !db 13 73. 74. 75. 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. Bus bays and shelters shall be provided at locations as determined by Riverside Transit Agency and the Department of Public Works. The joint use driveway easements shall be shown on the Final Map. No building permits for units with joint use shall be issued until the Final Map has been recorded, Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities, utilities, etc,, shall be shown on the Final Map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works, On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating 'drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions." An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy of the EC$ shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The following information shall be on the ECS.' A. The delineation of the area within the 100-year floodplain. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. The Developer shall deposit with the Department of Public WOrks a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the Developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements. A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be prepared by the Developer and submitted to the Director of Planning, City Engineer, and City Attorney. The CC&R's shall be signed and acknowledged by all parties having any record title interest in the property to be developed, shall make the City a party thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City. The CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City and recorded. The CC&R's shall be submitted to fie following Engineering conditions: A. The CC&R's shall be prepared at the Developer's sole cost and expense. The CC&R's shall be in the form and content approved by the Director of Planning, City Engineer, and the City Attorney, and shall include such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the interest of the City and its residents. I~:~TAFFRP~I44PA93F.COA 2/14/94 Idb 14 The CC&R's shell be recorded concurrent with the Final Map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City. De The CC&R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair and maintenance of all private areas, The CC&R's shell provide that the property shall be developed, operated end maintained so as not to create a public nuisance. Fe The CC&R's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition required by the CC&R's, then the City, after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the Owner's sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&R's or the City ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 81. A Precise Grading Plan shell be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval, The building pads shell be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 82. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. 83. The Developer shall pay the Public Facilities and Services Mitigation Fee as per the amended Development Agreement as reviewed and approved by the City. Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy 84. All improvements shall be completed and in place par the approved plans, including but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C, pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, drainage facilities, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets, 85. All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing end striping plan. 86. The traffic signal at Nicolas Road and Winchester Road shall be installed and operational per the special provisions and the approved traffic signal plan. 87. The Developer shall provide "stop" controls at the intersection of local streets with arterial streets as directed by the Department of Public Works. 88. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersection and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance as directed by the Department of Public Works. 89. Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied only as directed by the Department of R:~TAFFRI~I44PA93F.COA 2Y14Y94 Idb 15 Public Works at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section Nos. 37, 39, and 94 of the State Standard Specifications. 90. In the event that the required improvements on Nicolas Road along the property frontage of this development are not completed by AD 161, the Developer shall construct the required half width improvements per City Standard No. 100 or as otherwise determined by the Department of Public Works. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT General Requirements 91. A Class II Bicycle Lane on Nicolas Road shall be designed and constructed in conformity with the City's Park and Recreation Master Plan and in concurrence with the completion of the street improvements. 92. Construction of the public park site, perimeter landscaping and medians shall commence pursuant to a pre-job meeting with the developer and the City Maintenance Superintendent. Failure to comply with the TCSD review and inspection process may preclude acceptance of these areas into the TCSD maintenance program. 93. The developer, or the developer's successors or assignees, shall maintain the park site, parkway landscaping and medians until such time as those responsibilities are accepted by the TCSD. 94. All parks shall be improved and dedicated to the City free and clear of any liens, assessment fees, or easements that would preclude the City from utilizing the property for public park purposes. A policy of title insurance and soils assessment report shall also be provided with the dedication of the property. 95. All perimeter walls, interior slopes and open space shall be maintained by the individual property owners. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map 96. Prior to recordation of the first phase, the developer or his assignee shall enter into an agreement and post security to improve lot number 163, a three (3) acre site, as a public park facility, pursuant to City Ordinance No. 460.93 (Quimby). Lot No 163 shall be identified as a public park site and offered for dedication to the City on the final map. 97. Prior to recordation of the final map, the subdivider shall post security and enter into an agreement to improve the parkway landscaping and landscaped medians within Nicolas Road right-of-way in conformance with the City of Temacula Landscape Development Plan Guidelines and Specifications. All proposed slopes, landscaping and medians intended for dedication to the TCSD shall be identified on the final map as a proposed TCSD maintenance area. R:~TAFPRR~I44PA93P.COA ~14/94 kJb 16 98. Landscape construction drawings, consistent with the approved conceptual landscape plans, for the public park site, parkway landscaping, and medians shall be reviewed and approved by TCSD staff prior to recordation of the final map. Conceptual landscape plans shall include a half-court basketball court, All paring apacea ahall be eliminated from the park site design, (Added by City Council on January 25, 1994). Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy 99. Actual development and dedication of the park to the City shall be completed prior to issuance of the 34th certificate of occupancy, or within eighteen months of recordation of the first phase of the final map, whichever comes first. 100. Prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy, the developer or his assignee shall submit, in a format as directed by TCSD staff, the most current list of Assessor's Parcel Numbers assigned to the final project. OTHER AGENCIES 101. The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittel dated July 27, 1993, a copy of which is attached. 102. The applicant shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated September 20, 1993, a copy of which is attached. If the project lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of City of Temecula Land Division Ordinance No. 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the City prior to issuance of Occupancy Permits. 103. The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County of Riverside Fire Department's letter dated August 3, 1993, a copy of which is attached. 104. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Eastern Municipal Water District transmittal dated July 29, 1993, a copy of which is attached. 105. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho California Water District transmittal dated October 14, 1993, a copy of which is attached. I~:~'TAFFRP'~I44PA93F. COA 2/14~s4 Idb 17 COUNTY' OF R.IVERSIDF, * HEALTH 5~;WICE5 AG=J',ICY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RECEIVED CTrY OF TEME~ PLANNING DEPAKTMENT 43 174 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE TEMECULA, CA 99_590 ATTN: AUG 0 1993 R.E: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 27827: BEING A SUBDM SION OF A PORTION OF LOTS 182 AND 183 OF THE TEMECULA LAND AND WATER COMPANY, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 8, PAGE 359 OF MAPS, SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDS, TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF HAMILTON AFERUE, BANANA STREET, AND APRICOT STREET, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF THE RANCHO TEMECULA AS SHOWN PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGE 37 OF PATENTS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, ALL BEING IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVEP, SIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. (163 LOTS) Dear Gentlemen: The Deparnnent of Environmental Health has rmriewed Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 and recommends: A water p/stem shall be h~qalled.acc ording to ph._~ and specifi cad. ons as a ove d bv the witer cornpan and the Health D~parunent. P~xnnexit1 prints of ~el~lans o~ the water system ';~all be subtinned in '_ _-n,!plicate, ~ a ?n~n~mum scale not less than one incli e_qUals 200 feet, along with the original dry_wing to the City of Tcmecula. The pi-in5 shall show the mmrnal p_ip_e diameter, locauon of valves and fire hydrants; pi~e and 'oint Specifications, anii the size of the main at the junction of th~ new svstem to ~e exiddng_ system. The lans sh,U comply in all re ects with Div. 5, Part 1, Cha ter 7 of ~he California ~F;alth and SafeW Code, C-H~omia Admjnj-qrafive Code ~e 11 Chapter 16, and General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of~he Stare of C,HFornia, when applicable. The plans shall be signed by a re '_giStcred en'.gineer and water company With the following ccrdficaon: "l cerd_fy that the design of the water systcm in Tract Map No. 27827 is in accordance with the water svst~m cxp~qon p ~m~ of the P, hncho C-lffomia Water District and that the v/ater sentrees, storaz, and dism~bu~on system will be adequate to provide water service to suah' Tna Map". This c'dcation does not constiv, v~ a guarantee that it will _supply water to such Tra~ Map at any specific .quantifies flows or lm~c_ssures for fir~ tec'don or any other conrpany. The plans must be $ubmitmffto the Ci~v o~emegula's Office to review at least two w~eks tnior to the reouest for the re~oraaUon of the final ma~. prg_viding s~ri-~aory financial arranScxneaxts arc c lctcd with the subdivider. It ~ be necessary for financial arran,zanents to be ~ prior to the recordati0n of'- John M. Fanning, Director 4065 County Circle Drive * Riverside, CA 92503, Phone (909) 358-5316 * FAX (909) 358-5017 (Mailing Aaclrlss - P.O. Bo~ 7600 * RivemiOe, CA 92513-7600) Pa~e 2 Ark SaiedNasseh July 27, 1993 This subdivision is withh~ the w-~ter~ Muni~ Water Distri~ =d ~ be ~ca~.lS-ofzles. The p_hms s · s~ver distiia with the f~Ib_wing, s~wer syszm in Tract _Map No. 278'27 is in accord,m~e with the sewer system ~_xp,m-~ion pl'~'~ ct[ the ~ M~mieipal Wszer District anti that th~ waste diSposal svstezn is aclequNe_ at t~ri_~ tizn~ to tresz the anti ' ated wastes from · It will be necessary for financial axran~_crnc~,~ to be cmnplctely ~n~li?ed prior to rccordafion of the 'f:mal map. Sincerely, Sam Martincz, En~imml H~alth Specialist IV SM:clr (909) 275-8980 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT c: 'q- Zo- q'5 otsparcmrna~orsulxlivismnpnorto~ofme~najma;}- Feestobepaddahmjdlgeattmfaleinefiectat1~eljmeofrecordmmn, or H deterFro:l. It the tirnl of isstanc~ of the g pelTIljt. ~;I, il:FIA! INFf~FI--ATIr'!N C~ear~n~e~radin~m~~r~mer~na~p~r~v~d~h~u~dn~t~e~h~nun~meC~hasaeM~Md~~~~a ~qispmiectinvevesaFederalr.,.~a,qJencfM ~;;.,adAgency(FEMA)nappede_,e.~__!dain.~antheC3tYahoutdmquimmeal;;icamlo ~..,.wide all readies. r'~'d"~'tS, mer~tmhe~,b,,,,mmnretNimdmmeet FF, MA~ mmtm~addlurh'mrrecluimtmlhe maltaant eOtmnaC4xsditionaJi.eRm'ofMapRevilon(CLOMR)Wim'togradng, r dal~ormherf~eill:q:womclfalmeeje~mrlclll'mmrOlb Revimon (LOMR)' W to ~. If a natural wmemexse ~r rnmnt:ed f -u:~- - Plam iz irnecled bY thiz Pm)e~ the C,~/ zheuld remm~ N lcljcml m ~ a ~ l~lll~ AgreemenllmmmeCalit~mDe;- b,.a.a~RshandGarneendaCienWmerAc~Seclk:naO4PmmitlmmtheU-S-ArmYC4aO~d Etlgiral. a, orqm~ffllrl~.~,l.f4Mf"&rM. ~IM~III lig~i~thlP113ilCtlelllffl~b'iMIllhllef'-~' ,.,,f.d~ACleanWmerAC~ ~ · 404 Wamr Qu~Ca,fiificamm maybe mquire~trom me locad CaJilomia Regiond Wamr Quality Contml Bofd Wto ksstance°f the C°rps ownership ot ~ tablilies on wfmefi requesI ot me "~, Faltit~$ must I~ it~zac~ will be r~luir~l tot Distm::l Immptmt~, Pt~n Cltme~ ir :r : ~n K ,~. .... ,.tl/r ...... w~ati~ns~ef mam mmea aife nefua~y~imi~ed~bems~aped~i=kaefem~me~:)im~k~indueing~:Nsm= Mamer[:kana~ Plan lacilitms. om,r regional ~.__,~4_ ,,~,.~.,,; and drainage facidas whk=h endd b, ,/.,f '-'u.,d · legiod ,,,.-,,~ ,.it er --r -' ~ ot · ff,-..mr I=tan symen. and Divric~mm OrmnaO, Ftan feas(d--N~-I= ,..,.a ,,_'l~] -'~fees).ln adddon, kdr,,,dlke et mgenerd natm i, lnfovidet TheDism~hasnmreviewedlhelxmxmeclpmje~indemilmdN.kd_hek~dqm:ked,,~, .... fdbdonotinEnyweymm=itumorim~y~ am:~va~=ran~t. · .... aotm~lummomimm=wtmmmM~m--m~--haml.lad~hulmamlmlmyem/°ttmrsumissue: RIVERSt.DE o,,.../t RIVERSIDE COUNTY -. FIRE DEPART " ~TTEN: Temecula Planning Department Tentativ~ Tract ~T817 August With respect to the conditions of approval for the aDove refer- enced ian~ =ivi,,ion, the Fire Department recommends the following fire ~rotection measures be provide~ in accordance ~ith Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection ,,tanOarOs: i. Sc~ecuie A fire ~rot~cti~n. An aoQroved ,,tan~ar-~ fire .~r~n=~, (&.">~"x2 I./2'') io=ated one at each street intersection ~n= ~s~=~ no more than ~0 feet apart or no Deftion ~f lot ..... ~._~= more than 155 feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow ~nail De I000 SPM for 2 hour~ duration at 20 PSI. 2. A:mlicant/deveiooer snail furni,,h one c=.~y of the water plane =~ the Fire Deoar~ment for review. Plan,, shall De --igned De a reci~t~red civil engineer, c---nt~ining a Fire Department adDroYal ~i~nature ~i~ck. an~ M~al! conform ~o hydrant type, location, sDacin~ and minimum fire flow. Once Qlane are ~igned by the local water company', the original-- shale De presented to the Firs Deoartmen~ for signature. Blue dot reflectors shall be mounted in private street-- and ~r~veway~ to indicate location of fire hydrants. They shall be mounte~ in the middle of the street directly in line with fire 4. The reOuired water mystem, including fire hydrants, Ehall be in~=alle~ an~ accs~ted Dy the a~pro:rlate water agency prior t,= any --omou~ti~ie Duil~ing materlz~l being place~ on an in;ividual lot. '~ RIVERSIDE OFFICE 37~0 12lh Sm~k Rivmiag. CA g~,501 (gOg) ,'~/547?/* FAX ~)0~) 3~1451 HRE PREVENTION DIVISION H.ANNING'SECTION :D INDIO OFFIC:/ '/9*733 C~. ¢=lub Drivr, .Seine F. i~. CA 1619) 863-1116 · FAX 1619) 863*'7072, 5. Pri~r tc the rec=r=ati~n Df the f~n~ maD? the Uevtl~Der ~n&ll .oeDoE~t, with the City of Temecu~a? a ;alh ium of ~400.00 Der ~ot/un~t. a; mitigmtiDn for fire prote;tSon im~a:t~. ShoulC the develooer chooee to Uefer the ~imm of Daym~nt, he/~ne may enter into a written agreement ~ith the =ounty oeferr~ng saia ~ayment to the time ~f im~uance ~f the first builoing mermlt. ferred t~ the Planning and Engineering Staff. RAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire DeDartment Planner Laura Cabtel: Fire Safety SQeclali--t jF,,~istern ./YkunicipaL W at er ]tJiszrict iuly 29, 1993 RECEIVED Saied Naaseh, Case Planner City of Temecv~n Manning Depamn~t 43 I74 Buaincs Park Drive Tcm~cula, CA 92590 SUBJECT: Tract 27827 (PA 93-0144) Dear Mr. Naaseh:: We have reviewed the r~nt. eri~is trarlsmi~ by your office which describe the subject project Our comments are outlined below: General It is our understanding me subject project is a proposal to subdivide 22.5 acres located between Nicolas Ed. and the Santo Gern'udis Crc~ at the northwest corner of the inmrsection of Nicolas and North General K~.rney Rch., into 163 sin~e family residential lots with alleys and a 3.0 acre park site. The subject project is located within the District's sanitary sewer service area. However, k must bc undustood the available service capabilities of the Dhuict's system are continually changing due to the occurrence of development within the Disuict and proEmms of systems improvement. As such, the provision of ~m-vice will be based on the defiled plan of service requirements, the timing of the subject project, the staun of the Disuia's permit to operate, and the service agreement between the District and the developer of the subject project. The developer must arrange for the ~on of a de~il,.~ plan of service. The detailed plan. of service win in,fic~,e the location(s) and size(s) of system improvements to be .made by the developer (or others), and which are considered neces~,,7 in order w provide adequate leveh of service. To arrange for the prepan~on of a plan of service, the developer should submit information describing the subject project to the Disuia's Cuswmer Service Department, (909) 925-7676, extension 409, as follows: . . lvlsil To: Pos: Office Boz 8500 · SanJscimo, California ~2~81-8300 · Tdepbone 609) ~25-7676 · Pax (909) ~-02~7 Mare Off~:: 204~ S. $aa Jginm Avmug,$m~Jgiam · C.,.-ome-~/r-.l;,',---:f~Ams=: 440 F_ O~khml A~mae, Hema, C.A City of Tm~ula Tract 27827 July 29, 1993 Page 2 'Wzitmn request for a 'plan of service'. l~f. mimum ~00.00 deposit ~ ~sits may be requir~ for extensive development projects or projects loci,e6 in 'cliffjc,,!t to sen, e' geographic areas). P]zns/mz~os describing the exact lontion and nalxu'e of the subject project. Eipecially helpful rnnr~i~!s inc.2ucie graciing plans and phasing plans. Ranitnrv ,~ewer The subjca l:rwje~'t is considered tributary to the Di,~i~'s Tcrnccula Valley Pegions/Wat~ l'teclama~n F~ty CrVRI,VP, F) : The nearest existing TVRWRF system sanitary sewer facilities to the subject project are as follows: 15-inch diameter gravity-flow sewer aligned along Nicolas Rd. between Roripaugh and North General Keamey Rds. Other L~sues The District requires that onsite sewers be located within the proposed public roadways and not alle.vways. Should you have any questions regarding these comments, please feel free to contact this offxce at (909) 925-7676, extension ,~68. Very. truly yours, EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT David G. Crosley ~ce Senior,Engineer-Customer ,~ Department DGC/ck AB 93-835 (wl~mwk-'ri~?Sl? .clz) SZ~T Ry:TFM~na~ Ik 1anne ear ;10-14-83; 13:02; 9096946477;~ 2/3 Mz. SaicdNaa~ City afTm'm~d- !'h...;.~ IX4,m,~---t 43174 ;-~,.-~ Park f)tive Te-~-c-;% CA 92590-3606 SUBJECt: Taut No. 27827 The ,-~-Hn!~ RCWD water stom~ and distn'bufon systcm may aot bc ndequa~c to provide dm,,,-,,;,- wnmr rex1 ~z¢ pmtmtimt m-via:s to Ow p,,,pc,~ xcfuk..~d above ~th~/~_~,,,~ .... ,~, Dbtric( No. 161 (AD-16D. ~ following inRn-msfion iS int,~mI,A to explnin tbc Di.qlzict's ptaitionin providing~mtcr~n-vice to thisIron, Tlu: funn~ orw=z~ service withl- AD-161 is dcp~,~ qxm/hc prc, a,... ty ownc~ nnd the County of Rivcrsidc approving sul~l~,dml finnncing of w'J~r fr.:n'li~es to scrvicc the pmp=ttics within RCWD boundaric~ sysmm can st;port ~a;~.,,,s doveloln~ prior to d~e co..~.ud~on water supply b~-;ihl,-s. Bascd upon an -,Idit;Onn! hydrddic m,~hysis perFormed by Trans-Pacil"~ P .=;n, . :qg ~ and acnm] rmid ~zc flow msLt, Ih= mmsupportmaddiTion/maxinmmd~yfiowof40011~. 'Ibis flow · q,,-,.'~ to ~ 380 tzidml t ~;,~ zmils a~ 115 acres of co, m,,..,,.~l dovr;lopmmt or a n>mbination oftruth. 't"n~g som~ ~,-:t~iom to 1.150-foot ci.-vatioa am/~a,,..-dal dc~~t is rnnit=d to pmper6=s along tbc W;~-h~,. Ra~l r4midor at elevatio,s mm~r L.125 feel Uadcr mm/iao~ ttm Dimrim c3n m=~ ~c z~~ daqy 4c ...... ac iacluding flow ell,000 lpmutltb=cc~memial ~ ~-whindudi~amaziamm · . __ ..... m ' ~"'' ' Imlmellmlmksl , ~'lanninz Deparnnent 0etober 14, 1993 PaF Two The District will m:~-!X a~mff ~1~1{~"~ m~ a~~-~ ~ ~~ m~ ~~ fi~el~~~~ ~~~fm~~~l~~t mc ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ f~ ~ ~'~ m ~~ of ~ ~ ~ ~ ~p~ ~ For them protgr~m thnl tgqugg sm'vim aagr ~ avm'lablc gapm:ity is dc4i~i,,,4 of if tlmy do not nazi thc elevation conditions stated above, th= ~tm of the impl,---~",,g ~ idzmi~mt for Ar~ 15I will bc req'mred prim'm instalhlion of the me2z~s=.vice. Thos~k .... :j~ting f'~ilitics nr~ ~ below:. I. A 54-inch wamr nmin, parAid In W;,,- -~,.~'~r Rand, rtttn 1-15 Io Matgsrila Road; A DS0 Pressur~ Zon~ Immp slation nenf ~ kdx.,~da.iitm o[ ~ Rmmd nnd ~~ Ro~; A wsmr main in l~mrprita ~ tint i~ 30 incjms in ,4;-,,,,4,.r from ttg pusup marion to Rami~ Glen Drive, 30 inclu= to Dnt= ~ ..,,d 30 inchea along Dam S~ to Witu:hest=- Road; 24-inch waterline from thc intcnection of Margadta Road and Wipeh,.~,,,- Road to North Kenmy Road: 5. A corm~tion ~o ZIg 13SO Pr~sut~ Zot~ nt North Gtmmal Kmmy Read and Nitrains Road. As ~ above., it may be ~-cc--,ey ibr fig devdoper to upgtad~ tl~ e.~ri-~nf wamr sysu:m to pmvi&: sufficient prt:mu~ for dorr~"~c nnd l'Ire i~,,,ta:tion Ianlmm~ It nmy also he n~'~:e.,.-..y for the dgvdo~ u> install off-site facilities to mot the demands of this t~,a~-,ty. Howgv~, this does not mnstimte a gumantee thnz RCWD wall sut~ly warn- to said pat'c~ at my slgdfxe quantity, flow, or lm:ssum for tim protection or for nny oth~. ~ W'dl~- nvnilnbHhy would b~ conii~ent upon ti~ pu!~Aty ownn' sil,ming an Agency Ag,.z.,~.jxt ~ nsd~ ~ mn~,~.dl ~ if nny, to RCWD. ! r you sixodd hnve any ques6nn~ plms~ conlant m, Sinc~rdy, RANClIO CI~L!~-'ORNIA WATI!R DISTRICT Sentra Dolgt~, Eng;,~,.. ;,q~ Tcehnic~',q ITEM NO. 19 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATI'ORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning February 22, 1994 General Plan Consistency Handbook PREPARED BY: David W. Hogan, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: It is requested that the City Council: ADOPT Resolution No. 94- entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY HANDBOOK' BACKGROUND: In the process of beginning to implement the City's new General Plan, a number of questions have been raised concerning the issue of consistency with the newly adopted General Plan. As a result, Staff has prepared the attached Handbook to provide a standard methodology to guide implementation of the Plan. DISCUSSION: The purpose of the General Plan Consistency Handbook is to provide a standard methodology for determining whether or not a proposed development project, ordinance or program is consistent with the City General Plan. The Handbook has been designed so that as the programs are implemented, they can be incorporated into this procesS. The General Plan Consistency Handbook has been prepared using the following references: · l · The 1993 State Planning, Zoning and Development Laws; The State of California General Plan Guidelines; and The adopted City General Plan. To facilitate the use of the Handbook, all the Goals in the General Plan, as well as the policies relating to the Village Center Concept have been included as Attachments. A copy of the Handbook is included in Attachment No. 1 to this Staff Report. The draft Handbook was considered by the Planning Commission on February 7, 1994. The Commission suggested that additional language, which has been added, to clarify how inapplicable or unrelated goals and policies are addressed during the consistency process. A copy of the Planning Commission Resolution and Staff Report are included in Attachments 3 and 4, respectively. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposed Handbook will provide a standard methodology for implementing the adopted General Plan for the City of Temecula. As a result, approval and use of this Handbook does not have the potential to cause a significant adverse impact on the environment and is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act. FUTURE GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY: The General Plan Consistency Handbook will ensure consistent implementation of the City's General Plan; as a result, approval of this Handbook is cons. latent with the General Plan. FISCAL IMPACT: No additional fiscal impact or cost, beyond minimal copying costs, are anticipated as a result of the approval of the General Plan Consistency Handbook. Attachments: 2. 3. 4. General Plan Consistency Handbook - Page 3 Resolution No. 94- - Page 4 Resolution No. PC 94-02 - Page 7 Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 8 R:~HOOAND~OPCH.CCI 2/14/94 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY HANDBOOK R:~ttOOAND~OPCH. CCI 2/14/94 edl 3 City of Temecula GENERAl, PLAN CONSISTENCY HANDBOOK January 2.0, 1994 Pr~pm-e~ by: Advance Planning Division Planning Department City of Tcmccula TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1.1 1.1 1.t 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 PURPOSE 1 " ROLE OF THE GENERAL PLAN IN LOCAL GOVERNMI~',rr .................. 1 WHAT IS GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY?. ............................. 1 WHAT GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ............................... 2 WHAT GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY IS NOT .......................... 3 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE GENERAL PLAN AND OTHER PLANS .......... 3 NEW DIRECTIONS IN THE GENERAL PLAN ............................ 4 DETERMINATION 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 OF CONSISTENCY ............ 5 GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY IN THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS BEFORE THE DEVELOPMENT CODE IS APPROVED ................................. 5 GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY IN THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS AFTER THE DEVELOPMENT CODE IS APPROVED ................................. 6 GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY AND THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS .... 6 GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY IN STAFF AND AGENDA REPORTS .......... 15 GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY IN RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES ........ 15 OTHER AGENCY CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN ............... 15 CONCLUSION .................................... 16 APPENDICES A. LIST OF GENERAL PLAN GOALS BY ELEMENT ........................ 18 B. POLICIF_,S IMPLEMENTING THE VILLAGE CENTER CONCEPT ............... 24 Genera/P/an ~ H~ INTRODUCTION The purpose of the General Plan Consistency Handbook is to provide a standard methodology for determining whether or not a proposed development project, ordinance or program is consistent with the City General Plan. This methodology is intended to provide a minimum threshold for determining general plan consistency. As additional programs and processes are adopted, the consistency process will change. 1.2 ROI ,~. OF ~ GENERAL PIAN IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT The General Plan is the City's overriding long-term development and activity policy document. The future vision for the community in the General Plan is provided in the goals and policies contained within each element. According to State Law, the General Plan is supposed to be the City's ultimate source in determining what a community's long-term objectives are. According to the Governor's Office of Planning and Research, all governments engaging in land use planning must base their official regulatory land use, development, and subdivision controls on the goals, policies and programs identified in the Plan. The Goals in the General Plan are intended to provide a general intent or purpose toward which the City will direct its efforts. The Policies under each Goal are intended to provide a specific statement of principle to guide or direct governmental decision making. Most of the detail in the General Plan is located in the policy statements. 1.3 WHAT IS GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY? The term "General Plan Consistency" has two different meanings. The first meaning is the requirement that all the elements of the general plan be internally consistent. The second meaning refers to the need for all development approvals and City programs to be consistent with the goals and policies contained in the adopted general plan. Internal consistency means that all elements of the Plan must be based upon the same assumptions and conditions. It also means that each clement must be complimentary to and integrated with every other element. This requirement applies to all elements, whether mandatory and optional, which have been adopted by the City Council. This form of consistency is also very important when considering General Plan Amendments. The second meaning of General Plan Consistency is the requirement for all land use ~' and planning decisions, as well as other City programs, to be consistent with the adopted general plan. According to established legal precedent, the fundamental rule for determining the consistency of a governmental action, program, or project with the Gencral Plan is as follows: " '... when considering all of a projea's aspects, does it further the goals, objectives and policies of the general plan and (at a minimum) not obstrua their attainment or realization ?' This very broad and far-reaching statement has significant implications on City operations and the development review process. Being consistent with the General Plan does not mean being consistent or compatible with just the Land Use Map or a single policy. It means being in compliance with the Vision of the Future described in the General Plan (taken as a whole) and any individual elements. For many projects and programs, the majority of the goals and policies in the General Plan will not apply. In those cases when a policy statement (or goal) does not apply to a project or activity, that project is considered to be consistent with the General Plan as long as it does not adversely impact or impair the furtherance of the value(s) stated in the policy. 1.4 WHAT GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY IS When a Goal or Policy potentially applies to a specific project or action, the proposed project must be consistent with the General Plan. Listed below are several examples of what General Plan consistency is. Adopting a specific program described in the Implementation Measur~ of any General Plan Element. Having a specific Implementation Program action stating that a particular action should occur or function should be undertaken. Having Goals and Policies in several elements of the General Plan which have some relationship to a project or action, stating that the action should occur or that the particular issue should be considered and which is not contradicted by any other Goals or Policies. When a Goal or Policy does not apply or relate to a proposed project, the project is considered to be consistent with the General Plan if the project does not adversely impair or impact the accomplishment of the Plan's long-term vision for the future. 2 WHAT GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY IS NOT When attempting to explain General Plan consistency, it is often easier to describe what it is not rafter than what it is. Listed below are a number of examples of what General Plan consistency i$J!9.I. Interpreting a goal or policy in a way which is inconsistent with the other goals, policies, maps, diagrams, or text of the Plan. Using a policy statement that when taken out of context, could be loosely interpreted to support or justify a project. Interpreting an individual element in a way which is inconsistent with the other elements of the Plan. Considering one or more elements to be either superior or subordinate, to any other element(s) in the Plan. 1.6 RELATIONSraP BETWEEN THE GENERAL PLAN AND OTI~R PLANS Before the actual consistency process is discussed, the issue ofinter-plan consistency needs to be addressed. All City approved, or amended, specific and master plans must be consistent with the General Plan, just like any other development application, program or function. If the proposed or amended plans are not consistent with the adopted General Plan, the inconsistent components of those plans may not be adopted. This standard also applies to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan and the Old Town Specific Plan. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan has been integrated with the General Plan through Open Space and Conservation Element Goals 1 and 8. The Old Town Specific Plan has been integrated with the General Plan through Land Use Element Goal 6 and Open Space and Conservation Element Goal 6. All development applications, programs, and activities must be consistent with these other documents. When the Old Town Specific Plan or the Parks and Recreation Master Plan does not address a specific relevant issue, the direction contained in the General Plan is the guiding factor or principle. 1.7 NEW DIRECTIONS IN THE GENERAL PLAN The City General Plan contains a number of changes which will affect the current development review process. These changes represent departures from the City's (and County's) standard approaches to planning and development. These changes may also be the most difficult components of the Plan to implement. The major changes which will result from the adoption of the General Plan are highlighted below. % The active encouragement of clustered commercial development (often in neighborhood and village centers) and the discouragement of automobile oriented strip commercial development. The preservation of local environmental, aesthetic and biologic resource areas into permanent open space areas. The requirement that all development incorporate bike and trail network components into their designs. This includes connections to adjacent residential, commercial, and employment centers. The requirement for non-automobile oriented development in and around the Village Centers. The implementation of development and design standards for special areas within the community including: individual neighborhood and community areas, Village Centers, the south Highway 79 corridor, large lot, semi-rural residential communities, and hillside areas. The prevention of development in any floodway and the minimizing of development into floodplain and the use of non-structural methods for flood control whenever possible. 4 Genera/P/an Cons/mncv Handbook DETERMINATION OF CONSISTENCY GENERAL H. AN CONSISTENCY IN THF~ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS BEFORE THE DEVELOPMF~NT CODE IS APPROVED The period prior to the adoption of the Development Code will be a very difficult time for the City. We will be trying to review development projects for their consistency with the General Plan while using a partially inconsistent Zoning Ordinance. The key to successfully navigating this treacherous ground is to take extra time in the review process and carefully examine the Goals and Policies in the General Plan. The Plan contains several items which represem a departure from the City's previous approach to planning and development. These changes in direction are highlighted in Section 1.7 of this Handbook. The Consistency process contained in this Handbook is used to determine whether a project is consistent with the General Plan. The Pre-Developmcnt Code consistency process is the same as described in Section 2.3 of this Handbook. The main points to remember during this period are as follows: Before any development project, specific plan, development agreement, subdivision map or time extension is approved, the decision making body must find that the project is consistent with the City General Plan. Even when the project was consistent with a former county ordinance, the Southwest Area Plan, or any policy, tradition, practice or procedure, the project cannot be approved if it is inconsistent with the. adopted City General Plan. It is not important what previous City policy was; if the General Plan disagrees with this former policy, then the former policy is inconsistent and is no longer valid in the decision making process. When the strict interpretation of the City Zoning code would create an inconsistency with any goals or policies in the General Plan, the General Plan is AI-WAYS the controlling document. For tenant improvements and business licenses in existing buildings, review the proposed use and its conformity with the Land Use Designation identified on the Land Use Map. If the proposed land use is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation, it meets the General Plan consistency test.- 5 Note: The Business Park (BP) and Very Low Density Residential (RL) Land Use Designations will be implemented by several zones in the future Development Code. Before the draft zoning map is available for public review, if the use is permitted in either zone, then it is probably consistera with the General Plan. After the draft Development Code and zoning map are available for public review, it will become easier to determine General Plan consistency for tenant improvements and business licenses. This determination process will be even easier after the draft Development Code and Zoning Map are approvod by the Planning Commission. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY IN ~ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS AFTER THE DEVELOPMENT CODE IS APPROVED After the Development Code has been approvod, the process for determining General Plan consistency will become easier. Because the Development Code must be consistent with the General Plan, meeting the development requirements in the Development Code also ensures the consistency of a project with the City General Plan. Complete consistency requires a propc,~td project to be consistent with the Development Code and the consistency guidelines described in Section 2.3 of this Handbook. C, enerd Plan consistency review, like the Iniad Environmental Study, must be done early in the process before completeness is determined and prior to the first Development Review Comm.'.atee meeting. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY AND THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS These guidelines are not intended to provide an exhaustive list of issues to consider or a single all-reaching method to follow when reviewing a project for consistency with the General Plan. Instw_d, it is intended to provide a process for determining general consistency of any planning application with the City General Plan and is based solely upon the Goals contained in the General Plan. It is very important that the specific policies be used to evaluate the consistency of a project or activity with the General Plan. The City General Plan contains 63 broad goal statements that provide overall intent for nearly 350 specific policy statements. The need to be familiar with the Goals and Policies in the General Plan cannot be overstated. The basic General Plan consistency process consists of the following steps: Initial PrOject Screening. Review the application to determine what type of project is being proposed, where it is located, and what the local conditions and issues are in the vicinity of the project. 6 m Initial Goals SeTcoping. Review the Goal statements within the Plan to identify possible areas of compatibility and inconsistency. For example: Does the project appear to support the accomplishment of the goal; or, does the goal not apply or relate to the proposetl project? · Does the project appear to be contrary or counter productive to the goal? A list of the Goals is included in Appendix A of this Handbook. A list of the Policy statements which implement the Village Center Concept is included in Appendix B. Land Use Issues. Use the Land Use and Air Quality Elcmcnts to dcterminc if the proposed project is consistent with the Plan. Specifically, is it consistent with the: Land Use Designation. Are the land uses in the proposed project consistent with the Land Use Designation on the Land Use Map? Land Use Element policies and programs. Will the project result in: An ideal mix of residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, cultural, public and open spaces in the village centers? A City of diversified development character where rural and historic areas are protected and co-exist with newer urban development? iii. The protection and enhancement of residential neighborhoods? iv. The preservation and enhancement of local environmental and biologic resources? Vs The prevention of development in any floodway and the minimizing of development in floodplain? vi. A land use pattern that encourages public transit, bicycling and walking? The encouragement of clustered commercial development and the discouragement of automobile oriented strip commercial development? 7 Genera/P/an Conanencv H~ viii. The support of reffional land use ~rowth patterns contained in the appropriate regional and subregional plans? C. Air Quality Element policies and programs. Will the project result in: i. A future land use pattern which will result in improved air quality (and the enhanced use of public and other alternative forms of transportation) in Temecula? ii. The implementation of the needed transportation control measures? D. Village Center concept. Will the project result in: i. A project consistent with the Village Center Concept? ii. A project which encourages the use of non-automotive modes of transportation in the every day life of local residents? iii. The integration of residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, cultural, public, and open spaces land uses in a manner which will reduce the number of future vehicle trips? E. Old Town Specific Plan. If the project is located in Old Town, is it consistent with the Goals, Objectives, Development Standards, and Design Guidelines? F. Parks and Recreation Master Plan objectives and requirements? Envirovm,..ntnl Constraints. Resource and Safety Issues. Use the Open Space/Conservation, Public Safety, Air Quality, and Noise Elements to determine if the proposed project is consistent with the Plan. Is the project located in any of the following environmental constraint or issues areas? · · · · · · · · · An Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zone. An identified liquefaction zone. A dam inundation area. A 100 or 500 Year Floodplain. A Wildland Fire area. An area with significant biological resources. A 65-CNBL noise area. The Area of Influence for the French Valley Airport. The Mount Palomar Lighting District. 8 Genera/P/an Cor. s/stencv H~ Specifically, is the project consistent with the: A. Open Space and Conservation Element policies and programs. project result in: Will the i. The protection and conservation of surface, Found, and imported water resources? ii. The conservation of important biological habitats, species, and wildlife corridors? iii.The conservation of open space areas for a balance of recreation, scenic enjoyment, and protection of natural resources and features? iv. The protection of prime agricultural land from premature conversion to urbanized uses? v. The preservation of significant historical and cultural resources? vi. The protection of dark skies from intrusive light sources which may impact the Palomar Observatory? vii. The preservation of local environmental, aesthetic and biologic resource areas into permanent open space areas? viii. Preventing development in the floodway and reducing development in any floodplain? Public Safety Element policies and programs. Wffi the project result in: i. The protection of the public from geologic instability, seismic events and flooding hazards? ii. The protection of the public from hazardous materials and waste? Circulation Element policies and programs. Does the project: i. Need to provide a General Plan designated roadway? ii. Result in a truck transportation network which minimizes noise and air pollution impacts? 9 e Genera/P/an Ctm. stmnev Handbook Air Quality Element policies and programs. Will the project result in enhanced mobility and reduced air pollution emissions? Noise Element policies and proFares. Will the project result in: i. Improved separation between significant noise generators and sensitive receptors? ii. The control and reduction of noise between different land uses? iii. The reduction of noise impacts from transportation sources? Parks and Recreation MEter Plan objectives and requirements? Housing Issues. If housing is to be provided or removed as a result of the proposed project, use the Housing Element to determine if the proposed project is consistent with the Plan. A key question to consider is: does the project support implementation of the City housing program? Specifically, is the project consistent with the Housing Element policies and programs? Will the project result in: A wide range of affordable housing opportunities for all income groups? The removal of governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement and development of housing? iii. The conservation of the existing affordable housing stock? iv. Equal housing opportunity for all residents in Temecula? PrOject Desitm and Layout. Use the Community Design, Air Quality, Circulation, Noise, and Land Use Elements to determine if the proposed project is consistent with the Plan. Is the project located in any of the following special design standard areas? The Old Town Area. The South 79 Office/Commercial corridor. The Winchester/Ynez Village Center. The Town Center Plaza area. An entry gateway or corridor. · · · · · lO · A rural community. · A billside area. Specifically, is the project consistent with the: A. Community Design Element policies. i. Will the project result in: The enhancement of the City's image related to its regional and natural setting and its tourist orientation? ii. Design excellence in the site planning, architecture, landscape architecture and signage? iii. The preservation and enhancement of the positive qualities in individual districts or neighborhoods? iv. A streetscape system that provides a cohesive community image? v. The protection of the public's view of significant natural features? vi. The maintenance and enhancement of public spaces and resources? vii. Community gathering areas which provide social, civic, cultural and recreational opportunities? B. Community Design Plans. i. ii. nl. C. Air Quality Element policies and programs. i. Will the project implement the: Appropriate local and/or citywide community design concepts? Interconnection of open space areas? Village Center concept? Will the project result in: The enhanced use of public and other alternative forms of transportation? The implementation of the needed transportation control measures? 11 Circulation Element policies and programs. Will the project result in: i. A Level of Service 'D * or better during peak hours? ii. A Level of Service 'C' or better during non-peak hours? " iii. Enhanced traffic safety on City streets? iv. A regional transportation system that safely and efficiently moves goods and people? v. An adequate supply of parking? vi. Alternatives to motorized travel throughout the City? vii. A safe and efficient truck circulation system? viii. Encouraging the use of alternative forms of transportation including public transit, bicycling and walking? Open Space and Conservation Element policies and programs. project result in: i. The conservation of energy resources? ii. The conservation of open spaces? iii. A high quality park and recreation system? iv. A trail system that serves both recreational and transportation needs? Noise Element policies and programs. Will the project result in: i. The separation of significant noise generators and sensitive receptor areas? ii. The control of noise between land uses? iii. The consideration of noise issues in the planning process? iv. Minimizing noise impacts from transportation sources? '~ Wffi the 12 G. Land Use Element policies and programs. Will the project result in: The encouragement of alternate modes of transportation, including public transit, bicycling, and walking? ii. The implementation of the village center concept? H. Parks and Recreation Master Plan objectives and requirements? Public Facilities and Infrastructure. use the Growth Management/Public Facilities, Circulation, and Open Space and Conservation Elements to determine if the proposed project is consistent with the Plan. Specifically, is the project consistera with the: A. Growth Management/Public Facility Elemem policies and programs. Will the project result in: An effective and cost efficient sheriff, fire, and emergency medical service within the City? Adequate facilities which support the community's social, cultural, civic, religious, and recreational needs? iii. A water and waste water infrastructure system which supports existing and future development? iv. An effective, safe, and environmentally compatible flood control system? A safe and efficient solid waste collection, transportation, recycling and disposal system? vi. An adequate electric, natural gas, and telecommunication system? vii. The incorporation of bike and pedestrian trail network components in all projects? Open Space and Conservation Element policies and programs. Will the project result in: i. A high quality park and recreation system? 13 A trail system that serves both recreational and transportation needs? o iii. The implementation of the Park and Recreation Master Plan? Bconomic Develqpment. Regional Growth. and Jobs:Housinf Issues. Use the Air Quality, Housing, Growth Management, and Economic Development Elcmcnts to determine if the proposed project is consistent with the Plan. Specifically, is the project consistent with the: Growth Management/Public Facility Element policies and programs. Will the project result in: An orderly and efficient pattern of growth that enhances the quality of life? The cooperative management of growth among local governments within Riverside County? Economic Development Element policies and programs. Will the project result in: The diversification of the local economy to include a range of "clean' manufacturing, retail and service activities? ii. The maintenance of a sound financial foundation for City government? Establish a diverse education and training and job placement system which will develop and maintain a high quality work force in Tcmccuh? iv. The promotion of the advantages to doing business in Tcmecula? v. The development of Temecula as a comprehensive and recognizable tourist destination center? Air Quality Element policies and programs. Will the project result in the use of transportation system management and demand management strategies? 14 D. Land Use Element policies and programs. Will the project result in: i. The orderly annexation and development of unincorporated areas? The support of regional land use growth patterns contained in the approp, late regional and subregional plans? 2.4 GENERAL PLAN.CONSISTENCY IN STAFF AND AGENDA REPORTS When preparing Staff Reports to the Planning Commission and Agenda Reports to the City Council the heading of Village Center Concept should always included immediately following the General Plan Consistency heading. This addition will further integrate the Village Center Concept into the decision making process within the City. Consistency with the Village Center Concept is also very important when considering any future General Plan Amendments. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY IN RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES Like development and capital improvement program projects, City ordinances and resolutions need to be consistent with the long-term vision for the future contained in the General Plan. This consistency finding will generally be located in the whereas or finding sections of the ordinances and resolutions. It is recommended that the appropriate General Plan references always be included in ordinances and resolutions. This will provide an additional basis and foundation for the City's action and can be useful if the ordinance or resolution is later challenged in a court of law. 2.6 OTHER AGENCY CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN Section 65403(c) of State Planning and Zoning Law requires that each special district, uni~ed,.clementary and high school district, and joint powers agency which constructs or maintains public facilities essential to the growth and maintenance of an urban population must submit its capital improvement program to the City for a determination of its consistency with the City's General Plan. The capital improvement program must be submitted to the City at least 60 days prior to its proposed adoption by the governing body of that special district. According to State Law, the local agency or district may not carry out any part of its capital improvement program if the City has determined that it is inconsistent with the City General Plan, or any other applicable plan. However, the district or local agency may overrule the City's finding and carry out its capital improvement program. 15 P/an ~ Hadbook 3. CONCLUSION In conclusion, the importance of ensuring that all the City's actions are consistera with the General Plan cannot be overstated. For the appropriate City decision making body to approve a project or proposal, any areas of inconsistency between thc General Plan and the proposal must be eliminated prior to project approval or adoption. ff the proposed project is not modified to be consistera with the General Plan, then according to State Law, the project cannot be ~od. In addition, in the evem of any legal challenge to a City approval or decision, the courts will consider the consistency of the proposal with the City General Plan in making their decision. 16 C, enera/P/an Cons/stencv APPENDICES 17 6enera/P/an Cons/aencv Handbook LIST OF GENERAL PLAN GOALS BY ELEMI~NT 18 LAND USE )~I]~3~IENT A complete and integrated mix of residential, commercial, indusUial, recreational, cultural, public and open space land uses. A City of diversified development character where rural and hi~oric areas are protected and co-exist with newer mban development. 3. A land use pattern that will protect and enhance residential neighborhoods. A development pailern that preserves and enhances the environmental resources of the Study Area. A land use pattern and intensity of dcvdopment that encourages alternate modes of translxnUflen, including Wansit, bicycling, and walking. A Plan for Old Town that enhances the economic viability, preserves historic structures, addresses parking and public improvement needs, and emblishes design standards to enhance and maintain the character and economic viab'ffity of Old Town. Orderly annexation and development of unincorporated areas within Temecula's Sphere of Influence. 8. A City which is compatible and coordinated with regional land use patterns. CIRCULATION Strive to maintain a Level of Service "D" or better at all intersections within the City during peak hours and Level of Service "C" or better during non-peak houn. 2. Enhance traffic safety on City meets. A regional transportation system that accommodates the safe and efficient movement of people and 'good$ to and from the COmmUnity. An efficient City cixculation system through the use of transportation system management and demand management strategies. An adeq~ supply of private and public paridng to meet the needs of w~idents and visitors to the City. 6. Safe and efficient alternatives to motorized travel throughout the City. 7. A track circulation system that provides for the safe and efficient transponati0n of commodities and also minimive,s nois~, air poliution, and traffic impacts to the City. HOUSING ~l.VuV!l:n~ 19 5. OPEN SPACR/CONSRRVATION A diversity of housing opportunities that satisfy the physical, needs of existing and future residents of Tetnecula. Affordable housing for all segments of Temecttla. Removal of governmental constraints in the maintenance, development of housing, where appropriate and legally possible. Conservation of the existing affordable housing stock. Equal housing oppommity for all residents in Tenam. 7. 8. 9. social and economic improvement and A high quality parks and recreation system that meets the varying recreational needs of residents. Conservation and p~ of surface water, groundwater and imported water resources. Conservation of important biological habitats and protection of plant and animal species of concern, wildlife corridors, and general biodiversity. Conservation of energy. resources through the use of available technology and conservation practices. Conservation of open space areas for a balance of recreation, scenic enjoyment, and protection of natural resources and features. Preservation of significant historical and cultural resources. Protection of prime agricultural land from premature conversion to urbanized uses. A trail system that serves both recreational and transportation needs. Protection of dark skies from intrusive fight sources which may impact the Palomar Observatory. GROW'H:I MANAGEMPNT/PURI-~C FAcII.rrlR~ RI.pqVfRNT 1. Cooperative management of growth among local governments within Riverside County. Orderly and efficient pattoms of growth within Temeada that enhances the quality of life for residents. Effective and cost efficient sheriff, fire and emergency medical service within the City. A quality school system that contains adequate facilities and funding to educate the youth of Temecula. Public and Quasi-public facilities and sen/ices which provide for the social, cultural, civic, religious, and recreational needs of the community. A water and waste water infrastructure system that supixn'ts existing and future development in the Study Area. 7. An effective, safe and environmentally compatible flood control system. A solid waste management system that provides for the safe and efficient collection, wansponation, recovery and disposal of solid wastes. Adequate electrical, natural gas, and telecommunication systems to meet the demand of now and existing development. PUBLIC SAFETY Protection from natural hazards associated with geologic innability, seismic events, and flooding. Protection of the public and environmental resources from exposure to hazardous materials and waste. A safe and secure community free from the threat of personal injury and loss of property. 4. An effective response of emergency* services following a disaster. NOISE Land use planning that provides for the separation of significant noise genentors from sensitive receptor areas. 2. The control of noise between land uses. 3. Consider noise issues in the planning pKr. ess. 4. Minimi-e noise impacts from Wanspoliation noise sources AIR OUALITY m-nMENT 1. Improvement of air quality through proper ]and use planning in Temecnia. 2. Hahanc~ mobility to minimiTe air poHuUmt emjnions. 21 3. Incorporate energy conservation practices and recycling to reduce emissions. 4. Effective coordination of air quality improvement efforts in the Western Riverside area. COMMUNITY DI~-~IGN m-~ME~FF 1. Bnhancem~nt of the City's ~ rela~d to i~ re~ional and natural setting and its tourist orientation. new development and modifications to existing development. 3. Preservation and enhs~-.ment of the posffive qualities of jndividual districts or neighborhoods. 4. A streetscape system that provides cohesivehess and enhances community image. 5. Protection of public views of si~mificant natural features. 6. Maintenance and enlmncement of the City's public spaces and resources. 7. Community J~athering areas which provide social, civic, cultural and recreational needs ._~ of the community. ~:~ONOMIC DK~ O~ 1. Development of a strong base of clean manufacturing activities which employs a skjl|ed labor force and can be successfully integrated into Temecula's community character. 2. Diversif'tcation of the economic base to include a range of manufacturing, retail, and service activities. 3. Maintain an economic base to provide a sound fiscal foundation for the City as well as quality community facilities and Mgh service levels. 4. l~tabJ~,~h a diverse education and training and job placement system wMch will develop and maintain a Mgh quality work force in Temecula. 5. Promote the advantages to businesses of locating in Temecula, including cost advantages, amenities, housing, community activities and civic services. Develop Temecula as a comprehensive, recognizable tourist destination, with a range of attractions throughout and beyond the sphere of influence. Genera/P/an Cons/.ftencv Handbook POLICfES IMPLE34gNTING THE VHJ~AGE CENTER CONCEPT Policy 1.3 Policy 1.7 Policy 5.2 Policy 5.3 Policy 5.4 Policy 5.5 Policy 5.6 Policy 5.7 Policy 5.8 Policy 5.9 Policy 5.10 PoHcy 5.11 Policy 8.2 LAND USE Pt.P~rRNT Require the development of unified or clustered community-level and neighborhood-level commercial centers and discourage development of strip commercial uses. Require the preparation of specific plans as designated on the Specific Plan 0verhy to achieve the com~ve planning and phasing of development and Require the provision of pedestrian and bicycle iinim~s from residential areas to open space/recreation faci~ties, commefcinl and employment centers. Encourage variety in the design of sidewalh and trails with respect to alignment and surface materials to provide a convenient and enjoyable experience for the users. Provide grade separated bike paths along major arterials where feasible. Ensure that non-grade separated bike paths are designed for safety. Designate V'~!age Centers on the land Use Plan to provide areas within the COmmURity that are litban in character, OOHlRill a !nixttlfe of compatible uses, and are designed to reduce or eliminnte the need for the automobile in trave!ling to or within the VHI~e Centers. Encourage higher density re~devas$, mixed use development, and supporting public and community facilities within Village Centers. Establish design guidelines, development standards, and incentive programs for uses within VH!~e Centers. Develop a plan to link VHlage Centers by trniln and potential wansit systems including bus, shutfie and light rail. Ensure that the architecture, landscape desig~ and site plnnning within V'ffi~e Centers emphasizes a pedestrian scale and safe and convenient access between Ensure that adequate public gathering areas or plazas are incorporated within VHlage Centers to allow for social interactien and community activities. Discourage the development of strip commercial centers that increase auto- dependency. Provide a system of open space that is coordinated with regional open space uses to comprehensively address the management and conservation resources. Policy 8.4 Policy 3.6 Poticy 4.4 Policy 4.5 Policy 4.6 Policy 4.7 Policy 4.8 Policy 6.5 Continue to participate with the Western Riverside Council of Governments in the preparation of plans and programs addressing regional issues, including the Growth Management Strategy, Comprehensive Transportation Plan, Water Resources SWategy, and School Facilities Plan. CIRCULATION ~t.nMENT Coordinate with Western Riverside Council of Governments to identify, protect, and pursue opportunities for a light rail transit along major Wansportation corridon which connect Temecula to offier. popul_afion centers. Require new developmen~ to ineoxporate design features which facilitate wansit service and encourage Wansit ridership such as bus pullout ~, covered bus stop facilities, efficient trail systems through projects to transit stops, and incoxpox~on of paiemian walkways that pass through subdivision boundary walls. Require specific plans and mher mixed use projects to provide an internal system of trails linking s~hools, shopping centers, transit, and other public facilities within residential axeas. Provide a comprdensive system of Class I and/or Class H bicycle lanes to meet the needs of cyclist traveling to and from work and other destinations within the City. Encourage a ,nix of uses wiffiin a project designed to'maximize internal trip making, maximize the use of paricing facilities, and to promote a shift from auto use to pedestrian and bicycle modes of travel. Encourage the pwvision of additional regional public transportation services and support facilities, including park-and-ride lots near the 1-15 freeway and within Adequate linkages shah be provided for non-motorized mode, between residential areas and commercial/employmem activity centen, public institutions, and recreation axeas. Policy 1.3 Policy 1.6 HOUSING Require a mixture of diverse housing types and densities in new developments around ~e village centers to enhance ~eir people-orientation and diversity. Promote the development of compatible mixed use projects tha_t_ promotes and enhances the village concept, facilitates the efficient use of public facilities, and supports alternative nansit options. Policy 1.10 Policy 3.1 Policy 8.1 Policy 8.3 Policy 8.4 Policy 2.4 Policy 2.5 Policy 2.7 Policy 1.2 Policy 2.1 Policy 2.3 Genera/P/an Cmu/.ftenev Handbook OlYs~ SPACWCONSERVATION MaximiTe pedestrian and bicycle access to existing and new park facilities when appropriate. R~quire development proposals to idmify significant biological resources and provide mitigation including the use of adequate buffering; selective preservation; the provision of replacement habitats; the use of sensitive site planning techniques including wildlife corridor/recreafiol~l trails; and other appropriate measures. Provide a city-wide recreation real system that connects to the County's regional trail system through adoption of a Master Plan of Tr~iln that provides for bicycling, equestrian, hiking and jogging trails and support facilities. Require proposed development to provide Wail connections to the city-wide Wail system as defined by the Parks and Recreation M~ster Plan and Master Plan of Require development plans to identify locations for an intemal Wails/sidewalk system that iinkn land uses and provides convenient travel to transit facilities. GROWTH MANAG~/mNT/PUBI IC FA(~ JTIES gr-!~!ENT Encourage development of VH!a~e Centers, as defined in the Land Use and Community Design Elements to reduce public sentice costs and environmental impacts through compatible land use relationships, and efficient circulation and open space systems. Encourage new development that helps to create and maintain a balance between jobs and housing opportunities. Discourage the use of assessment districts that promote urban sprawl and premature urb~niTafion in rural agricultural areas. AIR OUALITY nLPMnNT Encourage in-fill development near activity centers and along transportation corridors. Implement transportation demand mamgement techniques to reduce motor vehicle trips, including walking, bicycling, rideshating, local transit, staggered work schedules and telecommunications. Pursue development of a public transit system including local shuttle and bus routes, and bicycle and pedestrian trails that are linked to regional light rail. Policy 2.4 Policy 1.1 Policy 2.2 Policy 3.2 Policy 3.4 Policy 4.1 Policy 6.1 Policy 7.1 Policy 7.4 Genera/P/an Condsencv Handbook Promote alternatives to motorized translxyrtation by establishing a convenient and efficient system of bicycle mutes and pedestrian walkways. COIV~'UNITY DESIGN Promote the development of a comprehensive system of trsiis and open space areas that connect schools, public recreation areas, residential areas and commercial centers. Promote a cohesive and integrated pattern of development for large undeveloped areas, by reqniring the preparation of Specific Plans. Preserve the scale and character of residential development by creating appropriate transitions between lower density, rural areas, and higher density development. Improve the pedestrian orientation, convenience and safety of commercial centers through the pwvision of pedesUian amenities such as benches, plaT~ areas, information kiosks and other street furniture, and through carerid site planning Promote the development of a continuous sidewalk and trail system throughout the City. Provide for street furniture in areas with high pedestrian activity and pwvide for shade trees in shopping areas. Encourage the development of public spaces and pln~s within commercial develoinnents that can accommodate cultural and social events and function as community gathering areas. Encourage development of common areas and facilities within residential developments to provide gathering areas for social and recreational activities. ATTACHMENT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 94- R:XHOOAIqDXOICI.I.eC1 ~I4/N. nil 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOL~ON OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF ~ APPROVING ~ GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY HANDBOOK. WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the first General Plan for the City of Temecula on November 9, 1993; and WHEREAS, the Plan does not contain adequate guidelines addressing the day-to-day use and implementation of the General Plan; and Wln~R~S, the City of Temecula desires to provide standard guidelines concerning the use and implementation of the General Plan; and WHERFAS, the General Plan Consistency Handbook will provide the needed guidance and direction to consisten~y implment the City's General Plan; and WIiRnR~kS, the City Planning Commission considered the Otmeml Plan Consistency Handbook at its F~mary 7, 1~4 meeting; and WITEIIRJ, S, the Planning Commission recommended that the Council approve the General Plan Consistency and adopted PC Resolution, 94-?.9?.; and W!~JIRJkS, notice of the proposed Handbook was posted at City Hall, County Library, Temccula Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Tm~xa~a VallL7 Chamber of Commerce; and WHEREAS, the General Plan Consistency Handbook was considered at the February 22, 1994. NOW, T!:!RIIRPORE, ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOIJOWS: Section 1. Environmental Complionce. The proposed project is exempt from the provisions of the C~lifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061C0)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. Section 2. Approval of the Handbook. The General Plan Consistency Handbook is approved for use in the implementation of the City General Plan. Section 3. 1994. PASSE1), APPROV!~ AND ADOPTED this 22rid day of Febnmry, RON ROBERTS MAYOR ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SnAIl STATE OF CALIFO~) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITYOFTEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, }IRREBY DO CERTIFY that the fo~-going Resolution No.94- was duly introduced and placed upon its first _t~dlng at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 22nd day of February, 1994, by the following roll call vote: COUNCn-MmMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: COlINCH, MEMBERS: 3UNES. G~ CITY Ct-PP, K R:~HOGAND~tIPCH.CC12/14/94 sdl 6 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION R:~HOGAND~GPCH.CCI 2/14/94 ATTA~ NO. 2 PC RESOLUTION NO. 94-02 A RESO~ON OF Tnr~ PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THF, CITY OF T~MECULA RECO~ING THAT ~ COUNCIL APPROVE OF Tnr~ GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY HANDBOOK. WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the first General Plan for the City of Temecula on November 9, 1993; and WHEUE~,S, the Plan does not contain adequate guidelines addressing the day-to-day use and implementation of the General Plan; and WHKUE~S, the City of Temecula desiw, s to provide standard guidelines concerning the use and implementation of the General Plan; and WHERFAS, the General Plan Consistency Handbook will provide the needed guidance and direction to consistently implement the City's G~--neral Plan; and WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Handbook was posted at City Hall, County Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecuh Valley Chamber of Commerce; and VHI!~,EAS, the General Plan Consistency Handbook was considered at the Febnmry 7, 1994, meeting of the Commition at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition. NOW, T!~ERI~.FORE, ~ HANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RECOhlMEND THAT Tnv. COUNCIL FOR ~ CITY OF TJE2~IF. LtlA APPROVE Tnv. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY HANDBOOK TO GUIDE ~ IIVIF,,I~erATION OF TBY, CITY GENERAL PLAN. Section 1. PASSED APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of February, 1994. STHVEN J. FORD CHAIRMAN I HEI~ERY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resohation was duly adopted by the Planning Commi.~sion of the City of Temeeula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 7th day of February, 1994 by the following vote of the Commission: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIOn: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: G~Y~ORNIr~L S~RET~Y ATTACHMENT NO. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT R:~IOOAND~OI~"H.CCI ~'148~. aal 8 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning February 7, 1994 General Plan Consistency Handbook Prepared By: David W. Hogan RECOMMENDATION: ADOPT PC Resolution No. 94- resolution entitled: recommending approval of a "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE COUNCIL APPROVE OFTHE GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY HANDBOOK" BACKGROUND: In the process of beginning to implement the City's new General Plan, a number of questions have been raised concerning the issue of consistency with the newly adopted General Plan. As a result, Staff has prepared the attached Handbook to provide a standard methodology to guide implementation of the Plan. DISCUSSION: The purpose of the General Plan Consistency Handbook is to provide a standard methodology for determining whether or not a proposed development project, ordinance or program is consistent with the City General Plan. The Handbook has been designed so that as the programs are implemented, they can be incorporated into this process without major modification. The General Plan Consistency Handbook has been prepared using the following documents: 1. The 1993 State Planning, Zoning, and Development Laws; 2. The State of California General Plan Guidelines; and, 3. The Pre-final version of the adopted City General Plan. To facilitate the use of the Handbook, all the Goals in the General Plan, as well as the policies relating to the Village Center Concept have been included as Attachments. A copy of the Handbook is included in Attachment No. I to this Staff Report. A draft of the Handbook has been reviewed by the City Attorney. The Attorneys comments included several suggested revisions to Sections 1.3 and 2.3. These comments have been incorporated into the attached Draft of the Handbook. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed Handbook will provide a standard methodology for implementing the adopted General Plan for the City of Temecula. As a result, approval and use of this Handbook does not have the potential to cause a significant adverse impact on the environment. Therefore, the Director of Planning has determined that the project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. · FUTURE GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY: The General Plan Consistency Handbook will ensure consistent implementation of the City's General Plan end, as a result, approval of this Handbook is consistent with the adopted General Plan. Attachments: 1. General Plan Consistency Handbook - Blue Page 3 2, PC Resolution No, 94- - Blue Page 4 R:~TAFFRP~GPC*H. PCI 2/14/~ i~ 2 ITEM NO. 2O TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~_ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Herwood T. Edvalson, Assistant City Manager~ February 22, 1994 PERFORMING ARTS/COMMUNITY THEATER RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider the City's participation with the Temecula Valley Unified School District in the construction and expansion of the Chapperal High School Theater for use as a community performing arts theater. BACKGROUND: Several months ago representatives of the community, including City Council and staff representatives, school district officials, members of the Arts Council, Kemper Officials, etc., made the trip to Poway to observe the success with which the Poway school district and City collaborated to make a performing arts facility available to the community. These same representatives also reviewed a proposal to convert the existing cinema theaters in the Tower Plaza to a smaller performing arts theater. Council consideration is required at this time in order to provide direction to the school district in their design end construction of the high school auditorium. In order to maintain the district's time lines for design of the high school, a decision concerning City participation has been requested by February 25, 1994. Attached to this staff report are three alternatives that have been prepared for discussion. Option One is the high school's original theater configuration. Option Two is the configuration that most closely resembles the type of performing arts facility that Poway has created. Option Three is an intermediate proposal designed what could be accomplished at the high school with · $1,000,000contribution from the City. For your information, attached to this staff report is a letter from the Arts Council and a sketch of the Tower Plaza Theater. FISCAL ANALYSIS: An almost infinite variety of possibilities exist for City participation in a community performing arts center.' Much of the City's funds have been committed to its Capital Improvement Program (CIP). One possible source of funding would be from Developer Impact Fees currently collected for municipal facilities. This project currently falls outside of the CIP. Alterations in timing and facilities in future parks might be used to cover a contribution to a theater project. The per unit costs for a project at the high school might be estimated at $100 per square foot for ancillary space, e.g., green room, actor's dressing rooms, etc.; $120 per additional seat; and $200,000 in architects fees for redesign of the project. TEMECULA VALLEY Unified School District SUPERINTENDENT Pa~cia B. Novotney, Ed.D. January 25, 1994 I Woody Edvalson, Assistant City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Fax: (909) 694-6488 BOARD OF EDUCATION Rosie Vanderhaak Joan F. Sparkman Dr. David Eurich Walt Swictda Bamara T0okef SUBJECT: Chapanal High Performing Arts Fadlity Dear Mr. Edvalson: At your request, we have developed a conceptual 400-seat Chaparrai High Performing Arts Facility for the City's consideration, as an alternative to the conceptual 800-seat Poway style theater previously developed. This new alternative would look more like a larger high school facility then a large community facility like Poway's. The 400-seat alternative proposed in the attachment could be designed and constructed for completion with the high school by 1997, with the following joint District/City participation: Construction Project Cost.' District funding $1.85 million (cost of the base 300-seat high school facility) City funding $1.0 million Joint-Use Agreement: This facility would be primarily serving the educational needs of the high school program, before and after school. Because of the additional 100-seat capacity, this facility would additionally be useful for community performances, during time periods not used by the high school. Ongoing maintenance and operation costs and staffing would be shared by the District and the City in a manner to be determined, agreeable to both. parties. Please note that the 400-seat alternative developed is one of many combinations of the ancillary facilities and features which could be incorporated in a $2.85 million dollar facility, constrained primarily by total building square footage. As mentioned to you, although we have previously developed January 1994 as the deadline for confirming a joint- use facility, we could probably work to achieve the schedule, if City funding and the joint-use agreement can be confirmed by February 25. Please call if you have questions. Hard copy to follow via U.S.Mail with better copy of proposal. Sincerely, .... Director of Facilities Development Attachment cc: Patricia B. Novotney, Ed.D., Superintendent John Brooks, Assistant Superintendent Business Services Lettie Boggs, Coordinator of Facilities Planning Fred Guslda, Trittipo and Associates 31350 Rancho Vista Road / Ternecula, CA 92592 / (909) 676-2661 (DAVE:CiTY4OOS.EAT) TUUSD P.01 FRCILITZES ID:909-695-7~:~5 3RN 25'94 .14:28 No,O05 ,, '~ , ~.,--r. ~ ,- : s II .# · , · : .I "t ! ~CHOO~D~'lli~T Temeadm. ~ 92692 ~UBJECT= Tm Vd.y P& Iofn '~1Anw C~ntef ~ Chapmad High Bohod lOOKkiltkmdaeabmkta~sSOOanttlmaterls 40O meet thetie - s~l~.oxlmJ~tly 1,200 stir_h;-' s,f, 6,900 :;.L ef mdFli.anr' eqm Metage ~o I~ mid ss Weiectotd:4m¶7,6OOL(./e2.BmlbeonmmatkmaofL .NmlIs4:)&A,~SOClAI~ 2386 ~ Ave. l ,SdCe1~ l ~ CA r20~ r,c~(b'ig)931-85~.~(619)~13.1-G5'/7 · · · · · :. I IJJJ " Z ,-- °z ,,'r' .,, ,,=, uP ,- E~ o, ' =~o= -~< ug ...o z ~ i- (DO Zu) z0 = o,..uP Z ~ ,9 ~' "' --J,~ ,',5ox°~< 0."<"' 0 ~ ~ Z tr I- n"g"rm, a.I-  i- _~ Ci ~ Z Z 0 O0 0 Z o®' d ®o®o®oo oNrCD z · · · · · ._1 _J <~ rr T rrI/ II I A preliminary study by the Am Council of Temecula Valley, led by Facilities Chairman Dr. Jeff Honon, has concluded that now is the time to seriously consider the establishment of a permanent Performing Am Facility for the Temecula Valley. The number of local music, cultural and artistic groups and associations has risen in number, activity and ongoing support to the point where establishment of permanent facilities can be feasible. It has become evident, also, that lack of such a facility will inhibit growth of cultural activities and prevent current orgsnlr~tions from being as active as they would like to be in our area. They currently must search out facilities in Lake Elsinore and North San Diego County in which to perform because there is nothing suitable locally in which to perform . The best facility in the Valley at present is at Murrieta High School at 451 seats. Along with a smaller facility at Elsinore High School, they have the only Orchestra Pits in the area and possess very reasonable acoustics. As cultural efforts grow and sophisticate, we are finding a large population of people experienced in music, dance and theater who were quietly living in the valley waiting for somethi~:tg to happen. They are now coming forth and stimulating additional refinement and vision to the cultm'al community. A local dance studio has suggested, for example, that with a proper facility they would like to organize a Ballet company. There are also people experienced in Big Band and Civic Light Opera who would become active with a place to pCt fOHth Needs would best be described as short term and long term. We have had' meetings with representatives of most of the valley' s cultural groups. Each meeting was Temecula Performing Arts Facility punctuated with a unanimous wish and excitement for a fully functional local venue. By fully functional we mean capable of handling virtually all local needs for at least a few years to come. Capable of seating at least 400 people, full dressing area, green room, 40 to 45 foot Fly Loft for sets, backdrops and curtains, adequate wing area four set handling and storage, a proper entrance area for refreshments and ticket sales, adequate rest rooms for the public and performers. All design, execution, equipment and seating must be of the highest quality to insure high regard and enthusiasm from both pe~ormers and the theater going public. Short term solutions began with a timely offer from the Kemper orgnnln~tion to consider converting the existing SoCal Cinema to a Performing Arts Facility. A feasibility study underwritten by the Arts Council and done by the Bluerock Pamership indicates that to create a fully functional facility, we could remove the center wall from between the two theater slots, build a stage, orchestra pit, and fly loft by extending the present building toward the freeway, and build wings on both sides of the building. All other facilities are there in one form or another at present. Estimated construction cost (with ample room for contingencies) is in the range of $1.9 Million dollars. There are some significant mutual benefits to this consideration. One is that by generating considerable foot traffic within the Tower Plaza we could materially assist Kernper in its revitalization of the plaza. The. landscaping is aRnc~ve, and there is certainly the expectation that businesses would establish there which would cater to the theater goer with products and services designed to make an evening at the theater more enjoyable. Dinner/theater packages, specialty dessert and coffee houses and the like are certainly to be expected. Most onsite and offsite improvements are already in place, as well as excellent freeway visability for a Marquee at the rear. 2 Temecula Performing Am Facility A separate free standing Facility from scratch must be considered to place the Tower p):~vn alternative into proper perspective. The architects have suggested that the $1.9 nM!lion dollar budget would build a slightly smaller structure on undeveloped land as long as there was no land cost, utilities were currently to the site, and the City/utility fee structure could be kept to a minimal mount. An ongoing analysis perhaps should always keep this option in mind in case future Philanthropic events make this a more attractive alternative. For the moment, however the Plan seems to be the best option. Long term planning would dictate the presence of a larger, more flexible venue. The presence of a 400 seat facility for at least five years wouM allow a level of activity and audience development to evolve which would then nammHy require a larger, fully capable venue. We feel that the community would be best served by a facility very similar to the Poway Center for the Performing Arts adjacent to Poway High School. In that case a partnership between the School District and the City of Poway allowed construction of a beautiful and fully capable 815 seat structure. Design, construction, and execution was superb, quality is very high. A facility that community can be extremely proud of for years. to come. The facility serves Poway and adjacent communities with a great variety of education and theater, also serving the High School by providing facilities for a high quality music, dance and theater program for its students. An unfortunate reality is that the vast majority of High School students today have never attended a live cultural event. With this arrangement that pwblem can be easily remedied, opening up new vistas of personal growth for our school. children. Outside organizations can be imported to provide Civic Light Opera, Ballet, Opera, and Orchestral music as well as a whole variety of popular'and educational programs our local associations may not be able to provide. Temecula Performing Arts Facility The opportunities accorded by the timing of construction of newly approved Chapparal High School will allow for exactly this kind of event to occur in Temecula. A meeting of representatives from the Temecuh Unified School District, Temecula City Council, Arts Council, various cultural associations, and the Temecula City Manager came to a unanimous opinion declaring this a high priority due to the window of opportunity being presented on both the Tower Plaza facility and Chappanl High, the opportunity to accomplish a major facility via a City/School District partnership at Chapparal using the resources of both entities to accomplish something neither would be able to accomplish alone makes a great deal of sense. The budget would approach $6 to 8 million dollars with $1.85 rniillon coming from the School District and the balance probably coming from a combination of City resources, Corporate donation, private donation, and certain outside sources such as the Endowment for the Performing Arts. The rehtive balance would have to be determined. The meeting consensus was that an overall plan including both short term and long term facilities should be pursued. Even though such a major project may seem a little large for our own community, we envision Temecula becoming a destination point for theater for people from miles around who do not have such opportunities. Fwm Fallbrook to Hemet to Lake Elsinore encompasses a substantial population to draw from. It would be a development such as we now enjoy within the Restaurant business, where there are far more restaurant seats than our population alone can support. The fact is that we have become a destination point for people from surrounding areas whose communities do not have such choices. 4 Temecula Performing Arts Facility The potential is there, the opportunity is there, the will is there, and we are quite sure the means is there. The 400 seat facility could be reality within a year with the 800 seat facility built in five years. I T~meeni~ Performlf~ Arf~ Thp~ter /nmst/gat/~ M~t/~g Oaober 6, 1993 Salient' Facts: Facilities after conversion: -- -. - -.. ~...: " Mens and womas ~ssing mats-'." ~n Room "" -. ., -~' Fly Loft: 40 to 45 foot. "' " "" Compulmized H~ti,tS system..= -=. -~~ Quality sound sysma ~--- - -4. S:-stimnted monthly sI2ndanc~: 5000 propie In-House ticlet office Dess~ and btvm'idge sales area Highly visible freeway marquee Rent: CAM (about 30 cemper. foot per month) plm ~ly some rent (negotiable) offered by Kernper!based on 7000 Square Feet (pt~Hmlnary). Construction Budget: Fees, Permits and Inspection: Contingencies: $1,516,000 $303,000 $273,000 $2,092,000 (prelimir,,try leasability plan and budget by the Blurock Parmership, designers of the Poway Center for the Performing Arts) DEPARTMENTAL 'REPORTS 'CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT APPROVAL: CITY A'I'I'ORNEY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official ~ February 22, 1994 Building and Safety January 1994, Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. DISCUSSION: The following is a summary of activity for January 1994: Building Permits Issued ............................................ 172 Building Valuation ........... ~ ............................. ~9,347,709 Revenue Collected ......................................... $85,141.34 Housing Starts ....... .. ........................................... 89 Building Inspections ............................................. 1725 Agenda Report FebmaW 22, 1994 Page 2 Code Enforcement Actions ......................................... 205 Active Cases Pending .............................................. 156 Closed Cases .................................................... 34 V:I,TONYIII!~rrmJAN'I4.Ret APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER [~/~, CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning February 22, 1994 Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File Discussion: The following is a summary of the Planning Department's caseload and project activity for the month of January 1994: Caseload Activity: The department received applications for 7 administrative cases and 3 for public hearing cases for the month of January as follows: EIR (Sponsor Prepares) Lot Line Adjustment Parcel Map Ongoing Projects: Old Town Soecific Plan: The Plan, was approved by the City Council February 8, 1994. Development Code: The consultant is working on a Public Hearing Draft. A final AdviSory Committee meeting will be scheduled ands joint Planning Commission/City Council workshop has been scheduled for February 28, 1994. French Valley Airoort: The City provided comments on the ALUC's preferred alternative for French Valley Airport on February 4, 1994. Water Efficient LandscaM Ordinance The Draft Ordinance was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on February 7, 1994. This item will be scheduled for a March City Council meeting. R:~IONTHLY.IqFT~1994UAN 2114/94 vgw 1 Temec: ,la Renional nenter RoecifiC Plan end FnvironmentAI Impact Report: This Specific Plan was presented at a Planning Commission Workshop on May 4, 1992 where the Commissioners gave direction to the applicant and staff. The Specific Plan is scheduled for a PC workshop on March 21, 1994. Environmental Impact Report '340 prepared for the Temecula Regional Canter was approved by the Planning Commission on June 21, 1993 and certified by the City Council on July 13, 1993. Winchester Hills and Camoos Verdes Roeci~c Bans and Fnvironmental Imoact Reoorts: These Specific Bans were discussed at a Banning Commission Workshop on May 4, 1992 where the Commissioners gave direction to the applicant and staff. The Notice of Completion for the Cam poe Verdes EIR went to State Clearinghouse July 10, 1992. Both of these Specific Plans went to the DRC meetings on January 5, 1993. Campoe Verdes Specific Plan is scheduled for a March 21, 1994 Banning Commission workshop. Murdv Ranch Soecific Ban and Fnvironmental linDact Report: This Specific Plan was presented to the Planning Commission at a Workshop on April 6, 1992. The Commission provided Staff and the applicant direction relative to design issues. The applicant has incorporated these changes into the Specific Plan. This Specific Ban will be sc!'eduled for a Planning Commission meeting upon completion of the Development Agreement and the Congestion Management Plan. An addendum to the EIR is currently being reviewed by staff. Johnson Ranch Specific Plan: The Specific Plan has been to a Development Review Committee meeting and is currently being amended to incorporate staff's comments. The EIR has been submitted and is being reviewed by staff. Attachments: 1. Count & Valuation Summary by Type - page 3 2. Revenue and Status Report - page 4 R:VklONTHLY.RFT%1884%JAN 2/14/94 vgw 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 COUNT AND VALUATION SUMMARY BY TYPE JANUARY 1993 R:~IONTl-lLY.RPT~1~g4.UAN 2/14/84 yew 3 REPT155 COUNT &VALUATION ILIaANY BY TYPE PAG~ 1 02/0?/96 16:56 SubtotaL: Crmtr Type Dmt~' ge 1 01/01/g& Thru 01/31/9~ JANUAIIY 199& Date TYlx: 1 Ty~ ,SeLect ):PLAN A/P/D Type Construction type Co~t Sq Feet VaLuation Fees Paid A PLANNING CASE-6/9/93 CERT OF CQI4PLAiAIVE FPN EIR (SPOIlSOIl PREPARES) LOT LINE ADJUSTNEWT NINOIt/14AJOI EVENT/PROFIT PtCL NAP-Cell IAD I~/INP PLOT PLAN ADI41NISTIUkTIVE 1 O .00 .IX) 1 O .00 I O .00 8,278.00 I O .00 960.00 I O .00 190.00 1 0 .00 1,8&9.00 10 O .00 12,701.00 TOTAL ee 10 O .O0 12,701.00 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 REVENUE STATUS REPORT R:~VKNTHLY.FFT%1884U,N~I 2114/94 vgw 4 REVPRISg 02,,0~,'~ O01 161 ACCGNT # 6101 6102 4103 6106 4105 4106 6107 6108 6109 6110 6111 6112 6113 6114 4115 6116 4117 4118 6119 6120 6121 4122~ 4123 41~4 6125 4126 4127 4128 41~9 6130 6131 6132 413~ 6135 4136 4137 6138 6139 41/0 4141 4142 414J,. 4145 6166 GENERAL FUND PLANNING DESCRIPTION RNENDED FINAL IMP APPEALS aRT. OF LAND DIV. (3)I4PLIANCE EXTENSION OF TIlE SINGLE FANILY TRACTS NULTI-FANILY TRACTS PARCEL IMPS LOT LINE ADJUST!4Brr KINat C~MI~: PARCEL IIERGER (2-4 LOTS) REC0RDABLE SIRDIVISION NAPS REVERSION TO ACREAGE (5+LOTS) SPECIAL SERVIC~ LETTER GEC:OID UNIT'PERMITS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONSISTENCY CHECKS GENERAL PUUi MENDNEJlT PLOT PLAN PUBLIC USE PERMIT REVISED PERNIT SKCIFIC PLAN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORIMNCE TB4ORARY OUTIX)OR EVENT TENPGIIARY USE PERNiT VARIANCE ZONING INFORMATION LETTER CEQA (INITIAL S11X)IES) GEQA ENVIROHENT IMPACT REPORT DEVELOIN4ENT AGREEHENT GEOLOGY 0RD. 54,7 APZ LAFCO PARCEL MP/I, IAIVER HERB ANENDED FINAL TRACY/PNt, IMP CERTIFICATE Of CORRECTION CCIDO TRACT IMP REVERSION TO ACREAGE LOT REVISION AFTER CHEat LOT LINE ADJUST. PLAN CHEGC CERT. OF a214PLIANCE PLAN CHEC~ (33ND. CERT. 0f CCNPL. PLII. GERT. OF PNt. HERB PLAN C3C CITY OF TENECIJI.A REVENUE STATUS REPQtT JAIMRY 1996 ADJUSTED ESTINATE .00 .00 .0O .0O .OO .00 .O0 JANUARY .O0 .00 .00 .IX) .IX) .(X) .(30 .00 .00 .IX) .00 .00 571.00 18.00 10,4~2.00 .00 .IX) .IX) .00 .IX) .O0 .IX) .00 .IX) .O0 .IX) .IX) PAGE 975.00- 1,072.13 2,5TT.OO- '18,&66.00- .00 2,700.00- 2,500.00- .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 260.00- 1,969.75- 9,985.00- .00 .00 148,Z59.25 3,707.00- 273.00- 500.00- .00 3,80&.00- .00 571.00- 18.00- 3,5~7.71- 10,4~2.00- .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .IX) .00 .00 .00 .IX) .00 .00 1.2 Lc',~tlN2 001 161 ACCI3UlIT# r,1&9 &151 &152 &153 415~ &155 &156 &169 4261 09:2&:56 Gf~IIERAL FUI) PLANNIlE DESCalPTIOM VACATIONS PLAN (3( IX)CIMENT PltOCESSING CONDB4NATXC)N PLAN CHECJ( REF. RSICNI TO ACRE. PLAN CHEa( PARCEL NAP PUiN CHECK TRACT IMP PLAN CHECK 4,TH & ILLS. lIMITTALl LCIM REVZEU DRAIILME fTLI)Y REVIEV IMPlOW !Ii~ECTION ON-SITE K-RAT STLI)Y FEEl FAST 11L&Q( PLANNING F01NA FAST TRA(X IN NOUIEFt. M CHECKI ANNEXATION FEES TEHP01tAItY USE PE!I4IT LARGE FilLY DAY CARE PYaPI~EJI IMft'E FACILITY LAND DZV UNIT NAP LAI)SCAPE PLAN NIX: PLANNING CITY Of TEHECULA REVENUE &'TAM REPORT JAIMRY 199& .4DJUITED EITIIMTE 1SO,OOO.O0 mY 8,315.11 .IX) .OO .O0 561.00 6,935,00 PAG~ 2 BALANf~ .X COL ,00 76,167.92 &9,2 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICEP~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA A(iENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Sealer, Director of Public Works/City Engineer February 22, 1994 Public Works Monthly Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for January, 1994. ~egdmt~O222~meeetrpt CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report JANUARY, 1994 Submitted by: Tim D. Serlet (~Prepared by: Don Spagnolo Date: February 10, 1994 WORK UNDER CONSTRUCTION: CRC: The Contractor has installed all exterior building doors and glass window walls in the gallery. All interior doors & extedor Iouvers will be installed shortly. Installation of the interior cabinetwork, suspended ceilings, and fire and security systems are on going. The wood floor in the gym is being installed along with the carpet and vinyl floor in the multi-purpose room. Riverton Park: The 120 day maintenance period began on December 30, 1993. Maintenance of the park is ongoing during this period. The contractor is responsible for fertilizing and weeding the planted areas of the park as specified in the contract bid documents. Some areas of the site receive very little sunlight during the winter season. Low temperatures and lack of sunlight have reduced the amount of hydroseed that has germinated. The contractor is scheduled to rehydroseed the slow growth areas during the middle of the month. It is anticipated that the park site improvements will be accepted by the end of April. Pala Communitv PArk: Due to the subsurface water conditions encountered, studies are being performed to analyze the effects of reducing the scope of the project. PUjol Street Improvements: A contract was awarded to IPS Services at the November 23, 1993 City Council meeting. The pre-construction meeting was held on January 5, 1994. The contractor should start work by the end of February. pwO4~momottpt~ipUenuey 02/11/94 Monthly Activity Report January, 1994 Page 2 Margarita Road Sidewalk Improvements: A contract was awarded to Joslen Construction at the January 25, 1994 City Council meeting. A pre-construction meeting will be held at the end of February. PROJECTS BEING BID: SpOrtS Park Slope Repair: Public bids are being solicited for the Sports Park Slope Repair improvements, Project No. PW93-06. The bid opening is scheduled to take place on February 24, 1994. Solana Way Street Imorovements: The bids were opened on January 20, 1994 and once the CFD 88-12 reimbursement agreements are finalized by the adjacent owners, staff will recommend to City Council to award the project to Yeager Construction, the apparent lowest bidder. WORK IN DESIGN Winchester Road Interim Ramo Improvements: The consultant has submitted plans to obtain an encroachment permit from Caltrans on February 8, 1994. Winchester Road Loop: The consultant has submitted the revised Project Report to Caltrans and the plans were submitted to Caitrans on December 27th for their review. Ynez Road Landscape Improvements: Final plans were submitted at the end of January for review. Construction is schedule to start in early spring. Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park: The first plan check comments for the plans and specifications for the concession stand and rest room facilities at Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park, Project No. PW94- 01 CSD, have been returned to the architect. The revised plans and specifications should be returned to the City for the second plan check before the end of the month. ;,wO4~THam:mt~ipUenuey 02/11/94 Monthly A~ Report Janwry, 1994 Page 3 I om~ I inda Park - Ih The revised improvement plans and specifications for Phase II improvements of Lome Linda Park, Project No. PW94-O2CSD, have been ratumed to the City for second plan check. The second plan check comments will be returned to the architect before the end of the month. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS l iefer Road. John Werner Road. Rantiq90 Road and Walcott Corridor: Staff has completed the process of reviewing the proposals for the above road projects and the firms with the highest ranking have been selected. Staff is now in the process of notifying all participants of the results. pwO4Vnoeotmt~dpUanue~ 02/1 TRAFFIC DIVISION Monthly Activity Report For January, 1994 Submitted by: Tim D. Serlet~~ Prepared by: Marry Lauber/~'/,~/ Date: February 1 O, 1994 I. TRAFFIC RFnUESTS TRAFFIC REQUESTS: Nov Dec Jan Received 7 17 16 Completed I 9 9 Under Investigation 6 6 7 Scheduled for Traffic Commission 3 2 0 II. ON GOING PROJECTS: Demonstrated Speed Monitoring Awareness Radar Trailer for Safe Traffic Cities Task Force. This is part of the gram selection process through the Riverside County Office of Education. The Program has currently allocated $6,000 but might increase with matching funds. Total cost runs approximately $10,000. Met with Caltrans to complete field review for Barrier Rail Replacement Program - Empire Creek at Front Street - ($22,300) C. Status of Design Projects - (See table below) Nicolas Road/Winchester Road Avenida Barca/Margarita Road Margarita Road/S.R. 79 (S) ** Emergency Vehicle Pre- Emption System 100% 90% 100% 90% 40% 0% 70% Preparing RFP * * On hold awaiting funding commitment from Caltrans for matching funds. r,~. !_bVt%UefrlcW4'denuery 02/10/114e~ LAND DEVELOPMENT Monthly Activity Report Special Projects January, 1994 Submitted by: Tim D. Serlet Prepared by: Raymond A. Casey FFMA/OFS RFIMBURSFMFNT: Staff is continuing to coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the State Office of Emergency Services (OES) representatives in seeking reimbursement for costs incurred by the City due to the January 1993 floods and ensuing disaster declaration, OES has reimbursed the City an additional ~34,603 for a total of $235,857 to date, LIEFER ROADIBRIDGF IPROJFCT Nn, PW93-O~h · project is currently under construction. The existing utilities have been relocated and the auutment over-excavation is ongoing. The next construction stage will be the forming and placing of the bridge foundations and abutments. pwOb'lmoaetmMev%94%januwy 021093 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent February 1, 1994 Monthly Activity Report - January 1994 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of January 1994: II. III. IV. Ve SIGNS A. Total signs replaced B. Total signs installed C. Total signs repaired TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns POTHOLES A. Total square feet of potholes repaired CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations A. Total S.F. VI. 23 41 19 49 108 168 4,500 52 8,404 Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 10 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 17 service order requests for the month of December, 1993. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 43 hours of overtime which includes standby time, P.M. surveillance {weekends only), and response to street emergencies. -1 - pwOE~roede~aG~pt/4~01 020794 ---. MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - January, 1994 Page 2 ORANt4;: COUNTY STRIPINn AND STI:NCll INn COMPANY rms comoleted the followino: · 156,652 L.F. of new and repainted striping 0 L.F, of sand blasting 0 L.F. of red curb 0 new and repainted legends The total cost for Orange County striping service was $13,246.17 compared to $36,362.49 for December, 1993. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of January, 1994 was $38,342.70 compared to $54,809.61 for the month of December, 1993. Account No. 5402 Account No. 5401 $28,696.12 89,646.50 CC: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer -2- pwOS~romde~mpt~4~01 020794 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - January, 1994 Page 3 STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following project for the month of December. DEL RIO CONTRACTORS Account No. 5401 Date: January 20, 1994 Deportola Channel Remove debris and silt grade channel to flow install riprap 279' in length to protect Deportola Street. Total rip-rap 310 tons ARBOR-PRO TRFF SFRVIC; Account No. 540:~ Date: January 4, 1994 42994 Agena Street and surround area Trimmed 6 trees for mail delivery, trash pick-up & sweepers Total trees 6 NELSON PAVING AND SEALING Account No. 5409 Date: January 5, 1994 40415 Calla Fiesta N/E of Via Norte TOTAL COST: $9,646.50 TOTAL COST: 50.00 Saw cut approximately 44 lin. ft. of asphalt paving, remove, and dispose of legally. Place SS-1H material prior to placement of asphalt paving. Asphalt patch approximately 240 sq. ft. with A/R 4000 3/8" asphalt material; Clean asphalt paving to install asphalt overlay. Place SS-1H material prior to asphalt overlay. Furnish and place 1" ( + or -) of AIR 4000 3/8" fine asphalt material in order to construct asphalt overlay. Clean cracks free of debris and vegetation, treat cracks with ground sterilizer, and fill cracks with ample amount of crack filler material. Total S.F. 240 Total A.C. 6 Tons TOTAL COST: e1,936.0u 4- pwOb'Voecle%a~trpt~J4~01 020794 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - January, 1994 Page 4 AAA PAVINn CO. Account No. 540~ Date: January 24, 1994 North General Kearney Road between Margarita and Calle Pitm Colada Apply tack coat and install. 10' thick asphalt overlay Apply petromat fabric prior to installing asphalt Total A.C. 149 Tons Total S.F.A.C. 20,592 @ .2361S.F. Total S.F. Fabric 39,600 ~) .105/S.F. MONTELEONE EXCAVATING Account No. 540~ Date: January 28, 1994 Rancho California Road elo Kaiser Parkway - Slope Repair 2. 3. 4. Export of 75 Tons of material Re-establish original flowline Widen walkway approx. 3' wide. by 80' long· Re-grade slope to 2:1 NELSON PAVING Account No. 540~ Data: January 26, 1994 Jefferson Street ~) Calle Cortez Repair two banner poles TOTAL COST: TOTAL COST: TOTAL COST: $9,017.71 $975.00 86,800.00 -4- pwOS%roade~eots1~t~94%01 020794 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - January, 1994 Page 5 Pt:STMAST;R S;RVICFS Account No. 5409 Date: Month of January Right-of-way weed control program Completion to date: 124 sites; 839, 102 sf (50.4%) TOTALCOST: ~9,817.49 pwOS~reede~e~trpt%94~01 020794 CITY OF TEMECULA DATE 01-04-94 01-10-94 01-10-94 01-12-94 01-14-94 01-19-94 0/~-~4-94 0 ,-z5-94 01-27-94 01-27-94 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED JANUARY 1994 SERWCE ORDER REQUEST LOG LOCATION 31630 Pio Pico Road 100 Calla Cortez 31067 Corte Anza 30463 Danube Court 32381 Circle Latour Front Street across from Shire Antique Shop Rancho Calif. Road W/O Calle Tajo Rancho Calif. Road E/O Margarita 42224 Roanoake Street 30121 Via Arboleda REQUEST Potholes Pothole Sweeper concern Tree trimming Pothole Broken grate Graffiti Hazardous materials spill Trash pick-up concern Trash pick-up concern WORK COMPLETED 01-05-94 01-11-94 01-11-94 0:1-12-94 01-14-94 01-19-94 01-25-94 01-25-94 01-27-94 01-27-94 TOTAL SOR'S 10 BDATE 01-03-94 01-05-94 01-05-94 01-05-94 01-05-94 01-05-94 01-05-94 01-05-94 01-07-94 01-07-94 01-07-94 01-07-94 01-07-94 01-10-94 01-10-94 01-11-94 01-11-94 01-11-94 01-11-94 01-11-94 01-12-94 01-12-94 01-12-94 01-12-94 LOCATION Ecluity Drive N/O County Center Montelegro 6) Pio Pico Pio Pico ~) Redondela Montelegro S/O McGabe McGabe ~ Amarita Amarita @ Santiago Margarita ~) Golf Course Temeku Golf Course Temecula Cemetary Humber ~ Rancho Calif. Road Margarita ~) Southern Cross Rancho Calif. Rd. ~ Tajo Rancho Vista @ Tajo 28497 Pujol Street La Serena ~) Camino Corto La Serena @ Via Puerta Camino del Este Camino del Este @ Camino Verde Via Puerta @ Camino Verde Margarita ~) Rancho Vista E.M.W.Do R.O.W. 28497 Pujol Pujol @ Main Street Bridge Rancho Vista ~ Calls Rio Vista CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED JANUARY 1994 GRAFFITI REMOVAL WORK COMPLETED Removed 40 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 20 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 10 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 10 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 8 SoF. of Graffiti Removed 2 S.F. of Graffiti Removed ' 4 S.F. of Grsffiti Removed 758 S.F. of Graffiti Removed' 320 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 240 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 20 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 35 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 132 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 140 S.F. of Grsffiti Removed 758 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 403 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 16 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 871 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 368 SoF. of Graffiti Removed 8 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 396 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 60 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 10 S.F, of Graffiti Removed 442 S.F. of Graffiti - 1 - pwO3Veed8%~i)1 ,Grefliti 020894 Grq=lTI - January, 1994 01-12-94 01-14-94 01-14-94 01-20-94 01-21-94 01-24-94 01-24-94 01-25-94 01-25-94 01-26-94 01-26-94 0/"*~-94 02-z8-94 01-31-94 01-31-94 01-31-94 01-31-94 Yukon ~) Red River La Serene Between Via Aguila & Via Puerta Ynez (i) Tower Plaza 41859 Skywood 26469 Ynez Pujol Apt. Complex 28550 Pujol Rancho Calif. Rd. between Tajo & Baja Vista 43025 & 43280 Business Park Dr. 43339 Business Park Drive Paloma del Sol (9 locations) (Pio Pico e Montelegro) Winchester EIO Diaz 28497 Pujol 28497 Pujol 28535, 28516, 28545 Pujol 27423 Ynez Road 27555 Ynaz Road Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed 260 S.F. of Graffiti 450 S.F. of Graffiti 12 S.F. of Graffiti 120 S.F. of Graff'~i 6 S.F. of Graffiti 1,120 S.F. of Graffiti 150 S.F. of Graffiti 120 S.F. of Graffiti 90 S.F. of Graffiti 150 S.F. of Graffiti 126 S.F. of Greffiti 90 S.F. of Graffiti 300 S.F. of Graffiti 196 S.F. of Graffiti 12 S.F. of Grsffiti 45 S.F. of Graffiti 86 S.F. of Graffiti TOTAL LOCATIONS 5.~ TOTAL S.F. 8.404 -2- imwO3Veede~wk~lOl .Gmffitl 020894 CITY OF TEMECULA DATE 01-.03-g4 01-.04-g4 01-06-94 01-19-94. 01-25-94. 01-31-94. 01-31-94. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED JANUARY 1994 C,A TCH BASINS I LOCAT!ON lama 3 (See Dally for locations) I I Area 3 (See Dally for locations) I Area 3 (See Dally for locations) Area 3 (See Dally for locations) Area I thru 4 (Rain) Area 4 (See Dally for locations) Area 3 (See Dally for locations) I WORK COMPLETED Cleaned and secured Cleaned and secured Cleaned and secured Cleaned and secured Cleaned and secured Cleaned and secured Cleaned and secured QUANTITY 48 basins 41 basins 31 basins 16 basins 13 basins 12 basins 7 basins TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED AND SECURED 168 -1- pw03~ede%wkempiM~4~01.CB 020794 DATE 0 1-03-94 01-03-94 01-04-94 (r 9-94 ol -04-94 ol-04-94 ol-o5-94 ol -05-94 ol -o6-94 ol -o6-94 o1-12-94 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED JANUARY 1994 TREE LOCATION Coronade Drive ~) Ynez Road Pauba Road E/O Ynez Road VIlla Alturas e) Pauba Ynez Road ~) Calla Halcon 42901 Domino Place 30194 Villa Alturae Pauba Road W/O La Primavers 31540 Pio Pico Road 24781 Lea VIoletas Mira Lores et Clubhouse Rancho VIsta ~) Meadows Parkway TRIMMING WORK COMPLETED Trimmed I tree for Trimmed I tree for Trimmed I tree for Trimmed I tree for Trimmed I tree Trimmed I tree Trimmed 37 trees Trimmed 2 tree Trimmed I tree Trimmed I tree Trimmed 2 trees sight distance sight distance sight distance sight distance for sight distance for sight distance for sight distance for sight distance for sight distance for sight distance for sight distance TOTAL 49 trees rimmed i)wO3boeclB~wk~t01 .t/e 020794 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED JANUARY 1994 IDATE 01-04-94 01-05-94 01-06-94 01-10-94 01-10-94 01-11-94 01-28-94 WEED ABATEMENT LOCATION Jededlah Smith ~1~ Hwy. 79 $. Pauba WIO La Primavera Pauba E/O La Pdmevera I Winchester O Jefferson Humbar Between Red River & Danube Court Rancho Calif. Rd. 1/2 W/O City Limit 30900 Buena Suerte WORK COMPLETED Cleared Cleared Cleared l Cleared Cleared. Cleared Cleared 300 $.F. 685 $.F. 1,700 S.F. 200 S.F. 95 S.F. 1,500 S.F. 20 S.F. R.O.W. Weeds R.O.W. Weeds R.O.W. Weeds R.O.W. Weeds R.O.W. Weeds R.O.W. Weeds R.O.W. Weeds TOTAL S.F. WEEDS ABATED -1 - pwO3Veede%wkemldlgA01 .Wee 020794 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED JANUARY 1994 DATE LOCATION 01-03,94 I Santiago E/O Ynez 01-03-94 01-03-94 De Portola W/O Mergerits De Portola W/O Margarits Area #2 (See Dally for locations) SIGNS 01-06-94 01-11-94 01-12-94 0 1-12-94 01-12-94 01-13-94 01-18'94 01-19-94 Jadedish Smith ~) Margarits Ynez ~) Palm Plaza Margarits Road ~it De Portola Meadows'Parkway ~) Pauba N. Gen'l Kearney (i) Cross Margarits Between Winchester & Solana 6th 0 Felix Valdez Margarits ~) Gen'l Keamey Rancho Vista EIO El .Greco 01-19-94 01-19-94 01-19-94 01-19-94 01-20-94 01-,-26-94 01-27-94 Margarits ~1) Rancho California Road Calla Medusa NIO Monoquie Circle Calla Medusa ~) Kaweah Rancho California Road ~) Humbar Calla Medusa N/O Evers Randto Vista EIO Margarits Rancho Vista FJO Margarits WORK COMPLETED , _~--, Repaired W-41 Repaired 10 signs (See Dally) Replaced 3 signs (See Dally) Repaired 4 signs Replaced 9 signs Replaced I R-1 Graffiti Replaced I K-Marker Missing Replaced W-53 Faded Installed 3 R-l. 2 W-17. 3 R-1A Installed 2 R-2 "25" Installed 4 R-2 "45" Replaced W-5 Missing . Installsad G-7-1 Replaced R-2 "45" I R-1 Graffiti (Missing) Repaired. "Bike Routs" end RTA Schedule Replaced R-2 "25" faded Replaced 2 R-1 faded Repaired 2 R-2 "45" Replaced R-2 "25" faded Installed 11 R-26/R-18 Modified W-11 Removed 76 Signs (Bee Dally) Installed W-11, R-63, W-75 4 carsonitss pwO3Voede%wkmqdtd~4%01 .age1 020894 IlGNI oJemmry, 1184 ¢II 01-31-94 Rancho Ca!if. Rd. E/O Meadows Parkway I Via Norta E/O Paseo Sereno Installed IReplaced 5 Carsonites '"N" Marker I carsonita TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED ~-q TOTAL SIGNS INST/q I Fn 41 TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED 19 ' pw03~reade~wkemlmltd~41D1 .sgn 020894 ~J TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1994 A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 11:21 PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Parks, Mufioz, Roberts, Stone PM. ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field end June S. Greek, City Clerk. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Director Roberts, seconded by Director Muftoz to approve Consent Calendar Items 1. AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Mufioz, Parks, Roberts, Stone NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of the meeting of 25, 1994. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT None given. COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT None given. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT None given. Mbtutls1020894 -1- 02/18/94 CSD Minutes Feburary 8. 1994 DIRECTORS REPORTS Director Birdsall announced she is awaiting appointment to the National League of Cities Committee on Community Services, and should have word in the next 10 days. Director Roberrs asked that the matter of a memorial in the Kent Hintergardt park be placed on the next agenda. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Director Muf~oz, seconded by Director Roberts to adjourn at 11: 12 PM to · meeting on February 22, 1994 at 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. Jeff Stone, President ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk\TCSD Secretary Minul~W020694 -2- 02JI ITEM NO. 2 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~_~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager/Board of Directors FROM: Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer. DATE: February 22, 1994 SUBJECT: Review and Approval of the Fiscal Year 1993-94 Mid-Year Budget PREPARED BY: Luci Romero, Financial Services Administrator RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO CSD 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGETS DISCUSSION: Each year a mid-year review is conducted of the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) fiscal year operating budgets. The purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure that the TCSD maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position. The Finance Department staff has performed the analysis of revenues. Additionally, TCSD staff has reviewed the operating budgets and has submitted year-end expenditure projections. Activity in each of the funds is presented in accordance with the following schedules: Schedule A - Budget Summary: Illustrates Fund Balance activity in terms of both the currently adopted budget and the recommended mid-year amended budget. Schedule A presents the beginning fund balance, revenues, expenditures and transfers, and the projected fund balance based upon this activity. Schedule B - Revenue Detail: Illustrates the revenue detail by fund source in terms of current projections, year-to-date received at 12/31/93, and mid-year revised projections. Schedule C - Expenditure Summary: Illustrates summaries of expenditures by each department within a fund. The expenditures categories are Personnel Services, Operating Expenditures, and Capital Outlay. Schedule A illustrates a projected fund balance of e 1,120,379at June 30, 1994, an increase of 8554,819 over the beginning fund balance. Schedule B illustrates a revised revenue projection of ~3,146,490,an increase of $554,630, or approximately 18%. The increase in revenue to primarily attributable to the one time Teeter Plan adjustment of $504,804, for prior year property tax delinquencies. Schedule C illustrates increases and decreases in expenditures which net out positively. Requested increases in expenditures include tree trimming and sod/turf at Rancho California Sports Park. Additionally, amended appropriations reflect the installation of perimeter split rail fencing at Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park. Mid-year adjustments in the remaining TCSD Departments do not impact the current assessments. The adjustments for TCSD Service Levels A through D are as follows: Service Level A: Revenues reflect an increase of $39,162, due to Investment Interest and the Teeter Plan one-time adjustment. No net increase in expenditures. Service Level B: Revenues reflect an increase of $21,039, primarily due to Investment Interest and the Teeter Plan one-time adjustment. Expenditures reflect a decrease due to salary savings. Service Level C: Revenues reflect an increase of $53,299, primarily due to Investment Interest and the Teeter Plan one-time adjustment. No net increase in expenditures. Service Level D: Revenues reflect an increase of $131,148, primarily due to Investment Interest and the Teeter Plan one-time adjustment. No net increase in expenditures. FISCAL IMPACT: The mid-year adjusted budget projections result in an increase in the year-end fund balance of $554,819 and no impact on current assessment rates. Attachments: Resolution Schedules A through C: - TCSD - Service Levels A through D Exhibit I Capital Projects and Debt Service Funds Exhibit II - Personnel Allocation By Department RESOLUTION NO. CSD 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGETS WHEREAS, each year a mid-year review is conducted of all Temecula Community Services (TCSD) operating budgets. WHEREAS, the purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure that the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position. WHEREAS, the mid-year review has been completed and the recommended adjustments are reflected in Schedules A through C of all TCSD operating budgets. The Board of Directors does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. That the Fiscal Year 1993-94 TCSD operating budgets are amended in accordance with Schedules A through C. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of February, 1994. ATTEST: Jeff Stone, President lune S. Greek, City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMEC~A) I HERI~.Ry CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 22rid day of February, 1994, by the following vote of the Board of Directors: BOARDMEMBERS: NOES: BOARD1VIE1VIBERS: ABSENT: BOAP, D1VIERIBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk/District Secretary 8CHE~)UI.~ A Revenue ExpendiNres Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures Transfers fTom (to) Other Funds Increase (decrease) in Fund Balehoe Fund BalBnce. July 1, 1993 Fund Balance, June 30, 1994 FYea-e,i FYeS-N F'Yea-N F'Yea-N ~ YTD AMENDED VARIANCE BUDQET i 12/31/93 BUDGET FAV/(UNFAV) 2,591.860 $ 84,845 3.146,490 2,163.321 1,063,310 2.163,132 $ H4,m 42e~ae {968.465} 983,ase 554,8~9 (S0S.000) 554,819 $ 554,819 TEMECXA.A COkedLNk~TY 8ERVK:E8 DIb"'ll~CT e4ERVICELEVELA BUDGET 8UMMArlY SCHEDULE A Revenue Expendlturee Inomsse (d®omsse) In Fund Balanes Fund Balm, duly 1,199~ Fund Balanoe, June 30, 1994 FY9844 FY93-;4 FYOS-G4 Fy9344 CURRENT YTD AMENDED VARIANCE BUDGET @ 12)'31/93 BUDGET FAV/(UNFAV) $ 157,004 $ e4S 196.466 $ 89,162 157,304 72,429 157,304 $ ('/1,781) 39,162 39.162 62,762 52,762 $ 91,627 $ 39,162 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE8 DISTRICT 8ERVICELEVELB B~ BUMMARY SCHEDULE A Revenue Ex. pendtn'es Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance Fund Balanoe, July 1, 19,03 Fund Balance, June 30, 1994 F"Yoa-N FYOa-N FYos.o4 FYe344 CURRENT YI'D AMENDED VARIANCE BUDGET ~ 12/31/93 BUDGET FAVI(UNFAV) $ 191,786 $ 2,676 212,804 S 21,0~ 191,766 77.828 179,816 11 .N9 $ (75,152) 32,068 32,ee8 $ 121,696 $ 32,988 TEMECULA COMMUNITY 8F. RVICE8 DISTRICT 8ERVTCELEVELC BUDGET SUMMARY SCHEDULEA RIIVe~ILle Expenditures Ine'eese (demame) in Fund Balance Fund Balance. July 1. 1993 Fund Balanca, June 30, 1994 FYOe44 FYOa-O4 FY93-94 I:YOe-N CLR:IRENT YI'D AMENDED VARIANCE BUDGET ~ 12/31/92 BUDGET FAV/(UNFAV) 422.801 $ 14,6~0 476.1 O0 I 53,29~ 441.60~ 296,459 441,603 (le,eo2) 228J17 210,015 228,817 263,314 $ 53,299 SCHEDULE A Revenue Expenditures Increase (decmue) In Fund Balanoe Fund Balance, July 1, 1993 Fund Balance. June 30, 1994 Fvee44 Fves-e4 FVea-N Fvea~4, CUIIRENT YTD AMENDED VARIANCE BUDGET ~ 12/31/93 BUDGET FAV/(UNFAV) $ 1.379,730 $ 811 1,419.000 (4,7s.~) 1.510.878 1A19,000 91,878 126,417 $ 131,148 131,148 S 131,148 -jlfllll.,~irltl -Miscel|aneous -investment Innrat -Operating Tramlea In -Public Use Permit TOTAL DEFT 180 -Contribulioris TOTAL DEFT 181 · ~L. ,~: ,'.: -.., :,L , -Aquaffc~ -Classes/Aclivffie~ -Contracted CIm .-Day Camp -Excursions -Field Rentals/Lights -Indoor Rentel/ -Spedel Events -Sports TOTAL DEPT 183 TEETER PLAN ONE TIME ADJUST. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT REVENUE DETAIL BY FUND SOURCE SCHEDULE B ~,,agel FY93~4 FY93-94 FY93-94 FY93-94 CURRENT YTD REVISED ADJIa"'TMENT BUDGET ~) 12/31/93 PROJECTION FAV/(UNF,AV) 2,415,360 1,088 2,415,360 0 0 0 0 0 0 475 475 475 0 .3,211 48,307 48,307 0 0 0 0 0 1,044 1,044 1,044 0 0 0 0 2,415,360 5,817 2,465, 186 49,826 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28,500 17,550 28,500 -', 0 2,000 1,205 2,000 0 20,000 7,256 20,000 0 37,500 17,763 37,500 0 7,500 4,819 7,500 0 12,000 2,741 12,000 0 3,(XX) 0 3,000 0 7,000 3,266 7,000 0 59,000 24,425 59,000 0 0 79,026 176,500 0 -AsseBmer~ -Investment Interest -,Smt Lighting Fees TELrrER PLAN ONE TIME ADJUST. TOTAL FUND 1 91 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE8 DISTRICT REVENUE DETAIL BY FUND SOURCE SCHEDULE B BUDGET (~ 12/31/83 PROJEOTION FAVI(UNF&V) 157.304 0 157.304 0 0 648 3.146 3.146 0 0 0 0 0 0 36.016 36.016 157,304 648 196,486 39.162 -Aseessmena 191,762 21 191,765 0 -Inve~,,,ent Interest 0 1.412 3.835 3.835 -Street I.igMing Fees 0 1,243 1,243 1,243 TEETER PLAN ONE TIME ADJUST. 0 0 15,961 15,g91 TOTAL FUND 192 /_:Asses___.-ments lecovery of Assessments -Investn~ent Interest -Public Use Permit -Specific Plan -Dedication Fees -Landscape Ran Check -Landscape Inspeclion TEETER PLAN ONE TIME ADJUST. TOTAL FUND 193 -Assessments -Investmere Interest TEETER PLAN ONE TIME ADJUST. TOTAL FUND 194 191,785 2,576 21 2,804 21 422,801 0 422,801 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,749 8,456 8,456 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,526 7,526 7,526 0: 3,375 3,3/S 0 0 33,942 33,B42 422,801 14,850 476,100 1.376.730 0 1.370.730 0 0 811 27.595 27,595 0 0 103.553 1.379.730 811 1.510.878 131.148 Tot~ Depm Personned ,Services Operating Expenditures Capital Outlay Total Department TEMECULA COMMUNITY 8ERVK:IS DISTRICT EXPENDmX:IE 84.NMARY BY DEPARTMENT CURRENT YI'D AMENDED ADJUSIit9~ BUDGET ~ 12/31/93 APPROPRIATION FAV/(UNFAV) 610,385 266,815 626,406 (16,021) 1,122,943 568,269 1,086,922 36,021 32,450 20.119 52,450 (20,000) 1,765,778 855,223 1,7ei,778 0 46,070 10,933 47,914 (1,844) 34,580 11,91 6 32,736 1,844 0 0 0 0 80,650 31,849 80,650 0 71 ,g'/9 34,910 71 ,TgO 18~ 47,750 24,854 47.750 I~, 0 0 0 0 0 119,729 59,773 119,540 189 Personnel Services 76,403 56,904 91,093 (14,600) Operating Expires 120,671 49,561 106,071 14,600 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 Total Department TCSD OPERATING TRANSFER OUT 197,164 106,465 197,164 0 2,163,321 1,053,310 2,163,132 2,668,321 1,053,310 2,668, 132 18~ ope~ng ~ cap~ o~ TOTAL FUND 191 Personnel Services Operating Expenditures Capital Outlay TOTAL FUND I g2 Personnel 8erv~m ~_--Operating Expenditures ;apital Outlay TOTAL FUND 193 TOTAL FUND 194 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT EXPENDlit. RE 8UMI/_a~Y BY DEPARTMENT SCHEDULE C FY9344 FY9344 FYg344 FY9344 CURRENT YTD AMENDED N3JUSTMENT BUDQET O 12/31/83 APPROPRIATION FAAV/(UNFAV) 20,002 12,088 22,667 (2,8136) 137,30; 60,341 134,607 2,685 0 0 0 0 26,253 326 14,304 11,949 165,512 77,502 165,512 0 0 0 0 0 1 91,765 77,828 179,816 11,9't9 372,651 264,588 366,407 6,244 0 0 0 0 441,603 296,460 441,603 0 0 0 0 0 1,41 9,000 674,606 1,41 9,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,41 9,000 674,606 1,41 9,CXX) 0 TOTAL ALL TCSD DEPARTMENTS 4,877,993 2,176,632 4,865,855 12,138 TEMECULA COMMUNITY ;4;RVICE~ DI~'RICT CAPITAL PROJECT8 FUND BUDGET BUMMARY EXHIBIT I Revenue Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over ~ilures Operating Tr'm'mfem In Increase (decrease) in Fund Balm Fund Balm, July 1, 1 ll9 Fund Balance, June 30, 1994 BUDGET $ 3,065,477 (3,0eS,4n) 2,6"75,410 $ 1,429,271 4,~ 3,~,g Revenue Expenditure Excess of Revenue~ Over Expendlares Operating Tmrmfem In Increase (decrea~) in Fund Balm Fund Balm, July 1, lgg3 Fund Balance, June 30, I gg4 1EMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE8 DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE FUND BUDGET BUMMARY FYg3-94 BUDGET 1,101,608 F'V'a~94 @ 12/31m S 50,152 EXHIBIT II PRR~ONNF, T. AT~LDcATJON ry DPPARTMF, NT Aummi~d CO~ SI~RVIC!~ MidY~m' 1993-94 Director of Comm,m~y Services Seuior Mam$maeat Aamlyst Recrcadoa Smqx-aime,,de,,, Maimemnce Sujx..;.~lc-n,'te~ Rccreadon Supervisor Admlniem~ve Secretary Msintensnce WoxJ~ Vol~ ~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 ZOO 1.00 9.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.133 ?.00 Departmeat Total ~" I:~~: S]~RVICE LEV'g,, A 14.00 14.00 Detriment: SEIRVICE LEVEL B 0.45 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.4~ 0.4S Deearmmnt: S:B:RVIC:E LEV]~ C 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1 ,,,miscs, l:e h~SpeClOT lklazmmat Toad 1.00 0.55 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.~ Tot~ Commu~t~ Services ~0.0~~ ITEM NO. 3 APPROVAl CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: David F. Dixon, General Manager DATE: February 22, 1994 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Grant Deed for Remainder of Sam Hicks Monument Park. PREPARED BY: ~.~ ~ Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant / RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Accept a grant deed from the Sam Hicks Monument Park Foundation for the remaining parcel within Sam Hicks Monument Park. BACKGROUND: On October 9, 1990, City Council accepted a grant deed and land lease agreement from the Sam Hicks Monument Park Foundation for the dedication of Sam Hicks Monument Park to the City. The park is located at the southeast corner of Moreno Road and Mercedes Street. The amenities of the park currently offer a tot lot area, shade trees, and picnic tables. However, a master plan of the park will be forthcoming to the Board of Directors which will include the construction of a museum, renovation of the church building, rest room facilities, walking paths, and other site improvements. The entire park facility is actually comprised of two separate parcels. The larger parcel, identified as 921-070-016, was dedicated to the City on October 9, 1990. The smaller parcel, identified as 922-023-011, has remained with the Sam Hicks Monument Park Foundation, even though both parcels have been maintained by the TCSD as Sam Hicks Monument Park since acceptance of the first grant deed. FISCAL IMPACT: Costs for maintaining this park have already been included within the TCSD Rates and Charges for Community Services, Parks, and Recreation for FY 1993-94. No additional costs will be incurred by the acceptance of the grant deed for this parcel. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Site/Location Map. 2. Staff Report 10/9/1990 and grant deed for first parcel. 3. Copy of grant deed for second parcel. r:%yeeinobk%eemhks 042284 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: MEETING DATE SUBJECT: CITY MANAGER/CITY COUNCIL SCOTF F. FIELD, CITY ATTORNEY OCTOBER 4, 1990 OCTOBER 9, 1990 SAM HICKS PARK RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept the offer of dedication of Sam Hicks Park subject to the reverter contained in the Grant Deed and the Declaration of Restrictions, and subject to the Old Town Temecula Foundation approving the revised land lease for the Museum. DISCUSSION: Last July, the City Council considered the offer from the Sam Hicks Park Foundation to dedicate Sam Hicks Park to the City~ The CSD has budgeted funds to maintain the Park. The Old Town Temecula Foundation has an existing lease of a portion of the Park and they intend to raise funds to build and operate a museum. When the City Council considered this matter last July, they directed the City Attorney to attempt to revise the documents to clarify how the Park would be used, and to seek to renegotiate the museum lease in order to reduce the lease term, improve the terms of insurance, and establish a time for construction of the museum. The City Attorney revised the documents and sent them out for review by the parties on August 6, 1990, and the Park Foundation replied on September 10th. Accordingly, the restrictions on the property have been expanded to allow the Park to be used for a historical, educational, public park or public recreational purposes. This is a broader definition than the limitation to park uses as originally proposed by the Foundation. The Foundation has insisted that the reverter clause be retained in the property. ~/~GD14757 However, it has been modified to include the requirement that the Foundation first notify the City of any alleged breach of the use restriction and be given an opportunity to cure the breach before any attempt is made to recover the property. We have also revised the land lease to a forty (40) year term with 'a twenty (20) year option. This is an improvement from the forty and forty year term originally proposed. We have also included a five year construction schedule in the lease as well as modifying the insurance provisions to require it to be adjusted according to the CPI. EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY City of Temecula PER GOV'T CODE § 6103 AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO City of Temecula 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO City of Temecula 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE CORPORA TiON GRANT DEED The undersigned grantor declares:. FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, SAM HICKS MONUMENTPARK FOUNDATION, a non-profit corporation, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of California, hereby grants to the CITY OF TEMECULA, a body corporate and politic, the following described real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto. This conveyance is made subject to those covenants and restrictions contained in that certain AgreemenT, executed by Nancy HauL'ice dated octobe= 9 ,19 90, and recorded on Official Records of Riverside County, California and upon condition that said property be used solely and perpetually for historical, educational, public park and/or public recreational purposes. If said property is not used solely and perpetually for historical, educational, public park and/or public recreational purposes, then Grantor or its assigns, and successors, without paying any compensation for any buildings or other improvements or betterments that may then be upon said premises, and without making any compensation or incurring any liability for damages or losses of any kind, shall have the power to terminate all right, title, and interest in the property granted-by this deed to Grantee and its successors and assigns, in the manner provided by law for the exercise of this power of termination, and shall thereupon have and enjoy forever all property granted by this deed, as if'this -1- conveyance had not been made. Grantee, its assigns or successors, shall thereupon immediately surrender possession of said property, and shall forfeit all rights thereto as required hereunder.. Provided, however, that Grantor may not exercise this power to terminate unless, within ninety (90) days after the breach of the use restriction, written notice is given to the Grantee of the breach, and Grantee fails to correct the breach within ninety (90) days after receiving notice of the breach of the use restriction. xecu d on April 9 , 19 91, at President ~ Mail tax statements as directed above. Temecula , California. ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA | On this 9th day of April , in the year 199l, before me, Susan W. Jones , a. notary public, personally appeared Nancy Maurice , proved to me on the basis of. satisfactory evidence to be the person who executed the within instrument as president of the corporation therein named and acknowledged to me that the corporation executed it. Notary Public fo State of California My commission expires: November 18 , 19 94 SLffiAN W. JONES Notmy PuMc-Calfomla RIVEaSIDE COUNnf November 18. 1994 -2- forth above. CONSENT The City of Temecula hereby consents to the grant of real property set City of Temecula By: R~onZl"jJ J. Parks Mayor Attest: By: ~JJune S. Greek City Clerk Approved As To Form: By: Scott F Field City AttOrney -3- EXHIBIT "A " In the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: That portion of Lot 6, and of the unnamed road in Block 2, as shown by Map of Subdivision of the Pauba Land and Water Company, in the County'of Riverside, State of California, as shown by Map on file in Book 11, Page 507 of Maps, Records of San Diego County, California, described as' follows: Beginning at the most westerly corner. of Lot 32, BloCk 1, of the Town of Temecula as shown by Map on file in Book 1 ~, Page 726 of Maps, Records of San Diego County, California; thence South 44 degrees 25'05" West, along the Northwesterly boundary of said town of Temecula, a distance of 141.45 feet to a point on the Northerly right of way line of an unnamed road (60 feet wide) as 'described in dedication and easement deed to the County of Riverside by deed recorded Apdl 22, 1969 as Instrument No. 39504 of Official Records of Riverside County, California; thence Westerly continuing along said Northerly line being the arc of a tangent curve concave Northerly and having a radius of 375.78 feet through a central angle of 19 degrees 01'17", a distance of 124.75 feet; thence North 17 degrees 08'42" East, along the Easterly line of said unnamed road a distance of 290.87 feet; thence South 45 degrees 02'38" East, a distance of 271.1 6 feet to the point of beginning. EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY City of Temecula · PER GOV'T CODE § 6103 AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Office of the City Clerk City of Temecula 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE GRANT DEED The undersigned grantor declares: FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Sam Hicks Honument Park Foundation hereby grants to the CITY OF TEMECULA, a body corporate and politic, the following described real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Executed on Califo~_l~.' "' 013192 ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE On,~,~f"',-- ~/'~'~ before me the unders' ned, A Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally appeared (or proved to me on the basis of satisfac~rr~ evidence) to be the person~d) whose nameJ~) is/ar~subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that 4~elshe/the~ executed the same in bis/her/thek-authorized capacity(iesh-and that by hislher/theirsignature(~) on the instrument the person(~), or the entity upon behalf of which the personS) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. · Signature CONSENT The City of Temecula. hereby consents to the grant of real property set forth above, and is accepted by order of the· Temecula City Council made on October 9, 1990. ATTEST: By: J~~.Gree'~k,'~ APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Scott F. Field, City Attorney 013182 3e/fetme/grerdeed EXIIIBIT 'A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION SAM HICKS MONUMENT PARK Parcel Being a portion. of lots 17,18,19,20 in block 23, as shown on Map of the Town of Temecula on file in Book 15, Page 726 of Maps, Records of the Recorder of San Diego County, California, more particularly described as follows: That portion of said lots 17, l g, 19,20 lying northerly of the northerly line of Mercedes Street, as described in a Deed to the County of Riverside Recorded April 15, 1976 as instrument No. 50513 of Official Records of Riverside County, California. Said Parcel cA" contains 0.07 Acres more or less. Subject to all covenants, conveyances, restrictions, reservations, rights, right of way and casements, if any, of record. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. · ~ No. LS6240~ EXHIBIT · 11 B II A = 0'} 56' 15" R · 4:~5.78' L= 7.13' TOWN N 44° 25'05" E /~.e,~ BLOCK 23 o2~, 23 22 OF T -:MECt LA S.D. 25' 25' SCALE: I" = 50' NORTHERLY LINE MERCEDES ST) 20 I 18 25; I 19.21' N 44~' 22' 13" E LEGEND F///A I. NDI CAT ES CONTAINS PARCEL "A",. A.P.N. 92f--023-011 O. 07 ACRES MORE OR LESS. 30' 30' 25'? / KRIS R. WINCHAK LAND SURVEYING - PLANNING SCALE: I DRAWN 8Y: I( .V,/, CHECKED BY: K.W. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT SAM HICKS MONUMENT PARK ITEM NO. 4 APPROVAl CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Community Services Board of Directors FROM: David F. Dixon· General Manager DATE: February 22, 1994 SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: Contract Change Orders No. 12 through No. 13 Community Recreation Center - Phase II Project No. PW92-29B Dhawn D Nelson D:rector of Commumty Services on Spa;nolo Pr;~c pal Engineer CapLI Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve Contract Change Orders No. 12 and No. 13 for the Community Recreation Center - Phase II, Project No. PW92-29B, for labor, material· and equipment in the amount of ~20,356.68. BACKGROUND: During the construction of the Community Recreation Center the following items of work have resulted in a change to the contract: CHANGF OR[)~'R NO. 19 Chemical Room Roof: The chemical storage room for both the community and wading pools was designed without a roof structure. A deign has been provided to construct a roof to match the architectural integrity of the existing structures. The roof will provide security as well as protection from the sun and inclement weather for the chemicals stored inside. SUBTOTAL: $ 5,202.14 CHANG; ORDFRNO. 13 Ravseck Heater System: The heater's pump system for the athletic facilities needs to be modified to meet the manufacturer's revised specifications for hot water circulation. The modification requires that the original boiler pump be removed and two boiler pumps of higher quality be installed. pw13~gdrpt%94%0222%pw92-29b 021094 e e 10. Boiler Pumn l=lectric-l: Additional wiring needs to be installed to supply power to the additional pump being added to the Raypeck Heater System. Smoke Detectors: Electrical conduit and wiring needs to 'be installed to supply power to the four (4) smoke detectors installed at various locations within the gymnasium corridor, gallery, and multipurpose room. Stage Area: The stage area walls and ceiling in the multipurpose room need to be painted black to accommodate stage productions. This will provide a suitable back drop for stage sets and lighting arrangements. Handrails and ~-aurdrails: Handrails need to installed along three (3) stairways located near the amphitheater, the northeast comer of the gym, and the stage. A gaurdrail needs to be installed at the east end of the b/,ocher area for the community pool. Rate Hardware: Install hardware to secure swing loaded gates in the open position. The hardware will enable large groups of people and/or equipment to be passed through the amphitheater and pool areas without the gates shutting behind them. Pull Box: S.C.E. required the pull box to be increased in size to meet service connection requirements. Stainless Steel Covering: The Health Department required that a stainless steel wall covering be installed adjacent to the food warmers in the kitchen. Door Pulls: The door pulls need to be modified from 12" to 18" to accommodate the specified panic bar hardware and satisfy the ADA requirements for door handle accessibility. Louvre Trim: Metal trim needs to be installed to complete the metal louvre installation in the gymnasium. The metal trim will cover the louvre supports. SUBTOTAL: $15,154.54 TOTAL: $.~0.356.68 FISCAL IMPACT: The original contract was awarded in the amount of $4,196,400.00. Contract Change Orders No.1 through No. 11 were approved for a total amount of $136,265.00. Contract Change Orders No. 12 and 13 will increase the adjusted contract by an amount not to exceed $20,356.68. The total adjusted contract amount for the project is $4,353,021.68. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Contract Change Order No. 12 2. Contract Change Order No. 13 pw131agdq}t~94%0222%pw92-29b 021094 City of Ternecula 43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590 (909) 694-1989 · FAX [909) 694-1999 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 12 CONTRACT NO. PW92-29B PROJECT: Commurdtv Recremlon Center - Phase II SHEET ,.1.. of .2.. TO CONTRACTOR: T. P. Penick & Sons, Inc. NOTE: TNs change order is not effective until muDroved by the ;:rmineer. THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR: An INCRFASF in the following item: Chemical Room Roof: The chemical storage room for both the community and wading pods was designed without a roof structure. A design has been provided to construct a roof to match the architectural integrity of the existing structures. The roof will provide security as well as protection from the sun and inclement weather for the chemicals stored inside. TOTAL: $ 5,202.14 Original Contract Amount ................................. 84,196,400.00 Adjusted Contract Amount ................................. ;4,332,665.00 Change Order No. 12 ..................................... $ 5,202.14 Total Contract Amount .................................... ;4,337,867.14 Adjustment of Working Days ................................. 10 Approved: Principal Engr. By: Cede: pwi3~,.~p,,fZ-29b~o~mo.12 talON CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 12 (~ CONTRACT NO. PW92-29B , SHEET _Z_ of _2_ We the undersigned contractor have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree. If this proposal is approved,. that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work. Data AccaptaU: :?/'/ Name: ~/~/I~ (print) If the contractor does not sign acceptance of this order, his attention is directed to the requirements of the specifications as to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written - protest within the time therein specified. City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590 (909) 694-1989 · FAX (909) 694-1999 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 13 CONTRACT NO. PW92-29B Community Recreation Center - Ph.me II SHEEr J_ of ~ TO CONTRACTOR: T. P. Penick & 8one, Inc. NOTE: This change order is not effective until anDroved bv the ;:naineer. THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR: An INCREASE in the following items: RayDeck Heater System: The heater's pump system for the athletic facilities needs to be modified to met the manufacturer's revised specifications for hot water circulation. The modification requires that the original boiler pump be removed end two boiler pumps of higher quality be installed. Boiler PUmp Electrical: Additional wiring needs to be installed to supply power to the additional pump being added to the Raypack Heater System. Smoke netactors: Electrical conduit and wiring needs to be installed to supply power to the four (4) smoke detectors installed at various locations within the gymnasium corridor, gallery, and multipurpose room. Staae Area: The stage area walls and ceiling in the multipurpose room need to be painted black to accommodate stage productions. This will provide s suitable beck drop for stage sets and lighting arrangements. Handrails and Gaurdrails: Handrails need to installed along three (3) stairways located near the amphitheater, the northeast corner of the gym, and the stage. A gaurdreil needs to be installed at the east end of the bleacher area for the community pod. e Gate Hardware: Install hardware to secure spring loaded gates in the open position. The hardware will enable large groups of people and/or equipment to be passed through the amphitheater and pool areas without the gates shutting behind them. Pull Box: S.C. E. required the pull box to be increased in size to meet service connection requirements. e Stainless Steel Covering: The Health Department required that · stainless steel wall covering be installed adjacent to the food warmers in the kitchen. Door Pulls: The door pulls need to be modified from 12" to 18" to accommodate the specified panic bar hardware and satisfy the ADA requirements for door handle accessibility. 10. CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 13 CONTRACT NO, PW92-29B SHEET .2_ of _~_ Louvre Trim: Metal trim needs to be installed to complete the metal louvre installation in the gymnasium. The metal trim will cover the louvre supports. TOTAL: $15,154'.54 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 13 CONTRACT NO. PW92-29B SHEET _3_ of _3.. Original Contract Amount ................................. e4,196,400.00 Adjusted Contract Amount ............. ; ................... e4,337,867.14 Change Order No. 13 ..................................... $ 15,154,54 Total Contract Amount .................................... e4,353,021.68 Adjustment of Working Days ................................. 25 Approved: Principal Engr. By: Date: We the undersigned contractor have given careful consideration to the change proposed and' hereby agree. If this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work. Date Accepted: =,~ -//-//-/~,~/' By: /~Z_/I~' (signature) Name://'~YI~ ~O~F/' (print) (company's name) Title: If the contractor does not sign acceptance of this order, his attention is directed to the requirements of the specifications as to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written protest within the time therein specified. (121094 ITEM 5 APPROVAl CITY ATTORNEY .~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Community Services Board of Directors Dave Dixon, General Manager February 22, 1994 Amendment to the Professional Service Agreement for Coordinator for the Community Recreation Center Project No. PW92-029B a Project PREPARED BY: (~_Shawn .D. Nelson, Director of Community Services Don Spagndo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Approve Amendment No. 3, extending the Professional Services Agreement for a Project Coordinator for the Community Recreation Center, Project No. PW92-29B, for an additional 36 days in an amount not to exceed e9,760.00. Appropriate funds in the amount of ~9,760.00 from TCSD bond proceeds to account number 250-190-129-5804. DISCUSSION: On December 8, 1992, the Board of Directors awarded a construction contract for phase II of the Community Recreation Center to T.B. Penick & Sons, Inc. The adjusted contract requires 255 working days to complete the project. The revised construction schedule requires a final amendment to the Professional Services Agreement to extend the services of the Project Coordinator an additional 36 days. On March 24, 1993, Steven J. Ford entered into an Agreement with the City of Temecule for Professional Services as a Project Coordinator for phase II construction of the Community Recreation Center. The Agreement was amended to extend the services of the Project Coordinator to coincide with the additional working days granted to the contractor. Amendments No. I and No. 2 were approved November 29, 1993 end January 11, 1994 respectively. pw13~agdq. t%94%O222~,frdanend.nd 0222 FISCAL IMPACT: The original contract amount was for $52,800.00. The adjusted contract amount is ~68,420.00. Amendment No. 3 will increase the contract by $9,760.00 for a revised total contract amount of $78,180.00. Approval of Amendment No. 3 will re~luire that the BoBrd of Directors appropriate funds in the amount ~9,760.00 from TCSD bond proceeds to account number 250-190-129-5804. pw13%agdq~94%O222~frdemend.no3 0222 ~l~f~T NO. 3 STEVEN J. FORD CRC PR~ COORDINATOR PURCHASE ORDER NO. 13849 The Agreement dated March 24, 1~3 Igtw~ th~ City ofTCroatia, and Steven L Ford (hea'ein r~femd to as "Agreement") is hea~by amead~d aa follows: Professional Servioe for the Community Remation Center Projec~ Coordination Services Community ~on Center Sec~on I I. The scope of mrviee~ as listed in exhibit * A" of t~.~ "A~ent" will ~ unchanged. The need for an additional 36 working days for the proem require, that the aervieea of the Project Coordinator be extended during this period. Section Compensation for services shall be total of all services described in this Amendment and shah not exceed N'me Thousand Wine Hundred and Twenty Dollars ($9,760.00). All above costs are eligible for funding through Tem~-ula Community Services District bond proceeds. The total cost of this element of the project is summarized below: Original Contract Amount Amendment No, 1 Amendment No. 2 Adjusted Contract Amount Proposed Amenthnent No. 3 $ 52,8(X).00 $ 5,280.00 $ 10.340.00 $ 68,420.00 $ 9.760.00 Total Contract Amount $ 78.180.00 pw13~clrpt%94%O222Xfrclemend.no3 0222 Section 3 All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same. The parties hereto have executed this Agreemeat on the date and year above written. ONSULTANT B By: CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVED AS TO FORM: , City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, CityClerk pw13~agdq~J4~O222~,kdemend.nckl 0222 DEPARTMENTAL REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: David F. Dixon, General Manager DATE: February 22, 1994 SUBJECT: Departmental Report PREPARED BY: ~ Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services DISCUSSION: Staff scheduled a Project Committee meeting for February 1, 1994 to discuss the final design components for the Sam Hicks Monument Park Improvement Project. As a result of this meeting, the project committee has approved the final design for this project. It is scheduled that the master plan for this project will be reviewed by the Planning Commission on March 7, 1994, the Community Services Commission on March 14, 1994, and the Board of Directors on April 12, 1994. The Redevelopment Agency Agreement which will provide funding for the Museum portion of the Project, will be presented to the Agency at its April 12, 1994 meeting. The Community Services Commission will discuss the installation of a memorial for Officer Kent Hintergardt to be placed in Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park. Staff is anticipating support by the Commission and will move forward with this project in the near future. The dedication of Palome Del Sol Park is completed. This park will be utilized for Adult Softball and Little League in March, 1994. The Community Recreation Center (CRC) Project is moving forward st an excellent pace. Staff is nearly completed with ordering the equipment and furniture needs for the CRC. It is anticipated that the CRC will be completed towards the end of March, 1994. The dedication ceremony will be scheduled for the end of March, 1994. The firm of J. F. Davidson Associates Inc. facilitated a public workshop regarding the skateboarding component of the Rancho California Sports Park Improvement Project on Monday, January 31,1994 at 7:00 p.m. at the Old Town Temecula Senior Center. Input was received in regards to skateboarding end roller hockey. A follow-up meeting with the project committee will be scheduled for early March, 1994. The construction of Riverton Park is now completed. It is anticipated that the 120 day maintenance period will end in April, 1994. The park will be dedicated to the community in May, 1994. r.~e~egendie~deptOO4.edn 0214e4 Staff has met with the Temecula Town Association to execute a lease agreement for the Northwest Sports Complex in the near future. The approval of this lease will be considered by the Community Services Commission at the March 14, 1994 Commission meeting. Staff is moving forward with the Loma Linda Park Project - Phase II. The plans are currently in for plan check and it is hoped that this project will be out to bid by the end of February, 1994. Staff started a new homebound meal program in January, 1994 for senior citizens who are not able to travel to the Senior Center. Currently, the program has increased from 20 seniors to 36 seniors per day who are participating in this program. Volunteers are assisting in this program which is co-sponsored by the County of Riverside, Office on Aging Department. Staff is currently working on potential construction options concerning the Pala Community Park Project. During the past several weeks, this project was halted by the Public Works Department because the ground was saturated with underground water, which resulted in heavy equipment being unable to perform the required grading on the site. Further analysis of the site has shown that the underground water table has risen from 9' to 12' below the surface to the current level of 2' to 4' below the surface depending upon the area. Many alternatives are currently being pursued by Public Works to determine what is the best course of action to address this situation. This item will be forwarded to the Board of Directors for consideration within the next 45 days. r.~gendaa~deptOO4.mln -0214e4 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HELD FEBRUARY 23, 1993 A regular meeting of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 11:22 PM. PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsell, Mufioz, Roberts, Stone, Parks ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None Also present were Executive Director David F. Dixon, General Counsel Scott F. Field and Agency Secretary June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. AGFNCY BUSINFSS 1. Minutes It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Mufioz to approve the minutes of January 25, 1994. The motion was unanimously carried. Stinulated Judoment Effectino T~'necula Redevelooment Aoencv Executive Director David Dixon presented the staff report. Agency Member Mur~oz asked if under Item No. 4, if this would permit the City to use RDA funds for incentives such as has been the case in the past. Mr. Dixon explained that AB-1290 prohibits the transfer of sales tax revenues from · city's general funds to Redevelopment Agencies. It was moved by Agency Member Birdsall, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to approve staff recommendation as follows: 2.1 Approve and authorize the City Attorney to execute the "Interim Stipulation" in the case entitled Dawes v. Citv of Temecula, Riverside Superior Court Case No. 194468MF (consolidated with 194948.) The motion was unanimously carried. Temecula Redevd0~meat Aien~ M'mates FebmaEf 8. 1994 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT Executive Director Dixon reported there has not yet been a response from the RTC regarding the Rancho West Apartments and stated the Agency will be informed as soon as word is received. GENERAL COUNSEL'S RFPORT None given. Ar-ENCY MEMBFRS REPORTS None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Agency Member Mufioz, seconded by Agency Member Stone to adjourn st 11:26 PM to a meeting on February 22, 1994, 8:00 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. Ronald J. Parks, Chairparson ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary ITEM NO. 2 CITY I,D~AGER , TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Redevelopment Agency/Executive Director Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer February 22, 1994 Review and Approval of the Fiscal Year 1993-94 Mid-Year Budget PREPARED BY: Luci Romero, Financial Services Administrator RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 BUDGETS FOR THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUNDS DISCUSSION: The Temecula Redevelopment Agency (RDA) Funds consist of Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund; the Capital Projects (CIP), Fund and the Debt Service Fund. The mid-year adjustments to these funds are explained below. LOWIMOD SET ASIDI: FUND The year-end revenue projection reflects an increase of $217,875. This increase is primarily attributable to a revision of the 20% set aside from the tax increment distribution; to an increase in investment interest; and to the one time Teeter Plan Adjustment. CIP FUND The revised revenue projection reflects a year-end estimate of investment interest. Expenditure adjustments are reflected in the Personnel Services and Operating Expenditures. Increases in Personnel Services are due to a distribution of personnel costs for City staff who are involved in redevelopment activities. Operating expenses reflect increases for trustee administration fees for the bond issuance and legal services. Further, as indicated in the City's General Fund activity, the Costco sales tax reimbursement is now reflected in the Redevelopment Agency budget. A significant decrease in expenditures is reflected in the transfer of the Educational Revenue Augmentation (ERAF) payment to the Debt Service Fund. Di::BT SERVIC;: FUND The most significant change in this fund is reflected in the method of accounting for ~" the tax increment distribution. The current budget projection represents the estimated ~net amount of increment to be received after pass through adjustments. However, the gross amount of the tax increment distribution is now being reflected in the year-end revenue projection. Correspondingly, the pass through adjustments are now reflected in the expenditures in this fund. Thus the net revenue is the relatively unchanged. The .' increase in net revenue is due to investment interest and the one time Teeter Ran Adjustment. Significant expenditure adjustments are as follows: 1 ) The costs required for Trustee Admin Fees has been projected to year-end; 2) The Passthrough Agreements are reflected in accordance with the discussion of revenues in this fund; and 3) The ERAF payment is being more appropriately reflected in this fund, it was previously in the CIP Fund. Additionally, the state has revised the required ERAF payment, resulting in an increased expenditure of approximately $100,000. FISCAL IMPACT: The CIP Fund is projected to have a $1 1,594,983 fund balance at June 30, 1994. This represents an increase of $245,651, over the original projection. The Debt Service Fund is projected to have a $4,434,357 fund balance at June 30, 1994. This represents an increase of $538,592, over the original projection. Attachments: Resolution Schedules A through C: -LowlMod Set Aside Fund -CIP Fund -Debt Service Fund 2 RESOLUTION NO. RDA 94- A RESOL~ON OF THE REDEVFJOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ~ING THE FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 BUDGETS FOR THE TEMECULA ItEDEVELOP54ENT AGENCY FUNDS W!:!F~REAS, each year a mid-year review is conducted of all Temecula Redevelopment Agency (RDA) funds. W].m~S, the purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure that the Temecula Redevelopment Agency maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position. WI~REAS, the mid-year review has been completed and the recommended adjustments are reflected in Schedules A through C of the RDA-Low/Moderate Set Aside Fund; the RDA- CIP Fund; and the RDA-Debt Service Fund. The Board of Directors does hereby resolve as follows: ~ion 1. That the Fiscal Year 1993-94 Budget for the RDA-Low/lVloderate Set Aside Fund is amended in a~ordance with Schedules A through C. Section 2. That the Fiscal Year 1993-94 Budget for the RDA-CIP Fund is amcndcd in accordance with Schedules A through C. Section 3. That the Fiscal Year 1993-94 Budget for the RDA-Debt Service Fund is mended in accordance with Schedules A through C. PASSH~, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of February, 1994. ATTEST: Ronald I. Parks, Chairperson lune S.' Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMEC~) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Redevelopmeat Agency at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 22nd day of February, 1994, by the following vote of the Board of Directors: AGENCY lgi~MBERS: NOES: AGENCY ~ERS: ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LOWAVlODERATE SET A~DE BIJD~ET BUMMARY SCHEDULE A Revenue Ex~endituree Increue (decrease) in Fund Balanoe Fund Balance, July 1,199~ Fund Balance, June 30. 1994 FYg~84 I:Yea-N FY9344 FY93-N CUIIRENT YTD AMENDED VARIANCE BUDGET BUDGET FAVIOJNFAV) $ 1.304.325 S 73.150 1,522,200 405,000 10,413 405.000 89g.325 8 62,737 1.117,200 4,6~,Q8 $ 217,875 217,875 $ 217,875 22-Feb-94 -Tax Increment -Investment Interest -Property Tax Increment -ONE TIME TEETER PLAN ADJ. ,A,~ ,.'.'.: :.',.:. TEMECULA REDEVELOF~ENT AGENCY LOWNOD SET ASIDE REVENUE DETNL BY FUND SOURCE $CHEDULE B FY 93-94 FY 93-94 FY 93-94 FY 93-94 CURRENT YTD REVISED ADJUSTMENT BUDGET e 12/31/93 PROJECTION FAV/(UNFAV~ 1,304,325 0 1,357,233 52,908 0 7,3,150 146,300 146,300 0 0 0 0 0 0 18,667 18,667 1,304,325 7'3,150 1,522,200 217,875 -Property Tax Admin Feee -Other Outside Services -Acquisition-Rancho West TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LOW/MOD SET ASIDE EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE C FY 93-94 FY 93-94 FY 93-94 FY 93-94 CURRENT YTD AMENDED ADJUSTMENT BUDGET APPROPRIATION FAV/(UNFAV) , 0 0 0 0 250,000 10,413 250,000 0 155,000 0 155,000 0 405,0(X) 10,413 405,000 0 TEMECULA FIEDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND BUDGET BUMMARY SCHEDULE A Revenue Expenditures Excess of Revenuas Over Expenditures Operating Transfers Out Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance Fund Balance, July 1. 1993 Fund Balance. June 30. 1994 FYg3..84 FYg3-g4 FY93-94 CUFIFIENT YTD AMENDED BUDGET BUDGET $ 239,039 1,945,098 453,737 (1,94S,O~e) (2'~4.69S) 1,891.597 (3,836,695) 13,294,430 11,349,332 $ (214.698) 418,318 2,117,765 (1,699,447) 1.891,597 (3,591.044) 13,294,430 11,594.983 FAV/(UNFAV) 418,318 (172,667) 245,651 22-Feb-94 -Investntent Interest -Bond Proceeds TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CIP FUND REVENUE DETAIL BY FUND SOURCE SCHEDULE B FYg3-94 FYlt3.-N FYg3-94 FYB3-N CURRENT YTD REVISED ADJUSTMENT BUDGET @ 12/31/93 PROJECTION FAV/(UNFAV) 0 239,039 418,318 418,318 0 0 0 0 0 239,039 418,318 418,318 Pemonnel Service Operating Expenditures CIP OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CIP FUND EXPENDITURES $CHEDULE C FY 93-94 FY 93-94 FY 9~94 FY 93-94 CURRENT YTD AMENDED ADJUSTMENT BUDGET @ 12/31/93 APPROPRIATION FAV/(UNFAV) 0 300 57,086 (57,086) 474,098 415,187 589,679 (115,581) 1,471,000 38,250 1,471,000 0 1,891,597 0 1,891,597 0 3,836,695 453,737 4,009,362 (172,667) TEMECtJLA FIEDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DEBT SERVICE FUND BUDGETtY SCHEDULE A Revenue Expenditures Increase (decrease) in Fund Balenee Fund Balance, July 1, 1993 Fund Balance, June 30, 1994 1,447,408 3,386,686 475,506 (414,646) FY 93-94 AMENDED BUDGET $ 5.825,521 $ 4,577.850 1,047,671 FYg3-94 VAillANCE FAVI(UNFAV) 3,669,034 (3,'13o,442) 538,~92 $ 4,434,357 $ 538,592 -Tax Increment -Investment Interest -Bond ~s -ONE qqME TEETER PLAN ADJ. TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DEBT SERVICE FUND REVENUE DETAIL BY FUND 8OUI:ICE 8CHEDULEB FY 93-N FY 93-94 FY 93-94 FY 93-94 CURRENT YTD REVISED ADJUSTMENT BUDGET @ 12/31/93 PROJECTION FAV/(UNFAV) 1,956,487 0 5,428,933 3,472,446 0 60,960 121,920 121,920 0 0 0 0 0 0 74,668 74,668 1 ,g56,487 60,960 5,625,521 3,669,034 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DEBT SERVICE FUND EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE C -Trustee Admin Fees -Property Tax Admin Fees -Passthrough Agreements -ERAF -Debt Service-Principal -Interest FY 93-94 FY 93-94 FY 93-94 FY 93-94 CURRENT YTD AMENDED ADJUSTMENT BUDGET @ 12/31/93 APPROPRIATION FAV/(UNFAV) 0 4,402 9,160 (9,160) 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,9/1,208 (2,971,208) o o lso,crra (lso,o73) 505,000 0 505,000 942,408 471,204 942,408 0 1,447,408 475,606 4,577,850 (3, 130,442)