Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout030894 CC AgendaAGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER - 28816 PUJOL STREET MARCH 8, 1994- 7:00 PM EXECUTIVE SESSION: 6:00 PM, pursuant to Govemment Code Sections: 1.§ 54956.9{a)Conference with Legal Counsel - Exirdng Udgation a. Modeflare vs the City of Temecule b. Rancho Regional Shopping Center vs the City of Temecula 2. i 54956.9(b)Conference with Legal Counsel - Antidpated Udge~on (one matter. At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM. CALL TO ORDER: Invocation: Flag Salute ROLL CALL: PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS PUBLIC COMMENTS Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 94-08 Resolution:'No. 94-24 Mayor Ron Roberrs presiding Pastor Charles Graham, New Covenant Fellowship Councilmember Parks Birdsall, Mufioz, Parks, Stone, Roberrs Expression of Appreciation for Joseph Alcorn, DVM Presentation by Temecula Police Department A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink 'Request to Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. R:%,t4e~de%030894 I When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other 8gend8 items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 2 Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of February 8, 1994; 3 Resolution Aoorovino List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-,_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A R:~er, da~3OBl4 2 4 City Treasurer's ReDort RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's report as of January 31 ', 1994. J Ynez Corridor Sales Tax Ac3reement and Joint Financing Agreement for Solana Way Widening RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign, the following in substantially the form presented, subject to approval by the City Manager and City Attorney as to the final form of the agreements: "First Amendment to the Agreement between City of Temecula and Eli Lilly and Company, an Indiana Corporation regarding Sales Tax Revenues of Community Facilities District No. 88-12." 0 "First Amendment to Agreement between the City of Temecula and Rancho Mobile Home Estates regarding Sales Tax Revenues of Community Facilities District No. 88-12 (Ynez Corridor)" and "First Amendment to Joint Financing Agreement Between Community Facilities District No. 88-12 of the County of Riverside and the City of Temecula" Award of Contract for Solana Way Street Improvements (Project No. PW93-12) RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Award a contract for the Solana Way Street Improvements, Project PW 92- 12, to E. L. Yeager Construction Company for $149,570.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract subject to approval by the County of Riverside and the adjacent property owners. 6.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $1 4,957.00, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. Solicitation for Construction of a Single Concrete Box Culvert on Ynez Road RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Authorize solicitation for bids for construction of a single box culvert located on Ynez Road, 365 feet south of Vallejo Avenue on the east side of Ynez Road. Destruction of Records Reauest RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. , Release Faithful Performance Warranty Bonds and Material and Labor Bonds in Tract No. 21674-F RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Authorize the release of Street and Water and Sewer Improvement Faithful Performance Warrant Bonds and Material & Labor Bonds in Tract No. 21674- F. 9.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. 10. 11. Final Parcel MaD No. 27509 RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Approve Final Parcel Map No. 27509 subject to the attached conditions of approval. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 94-06 RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION NO. 18.28.A.C.(10)OF ORDINANCE NO. 348 PERTAINING TO THE TYPE OF PAVING MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR ACCESS TO SECOND DWELLING UNITS R:~kgende~0308~4 4 12. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 94-07 RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94-07 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 13. Contiguous Parcel Maroar Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 16.7 OF ORDINANCE NO. 460 PERTAINING TO THE MERGER OF CONTIGUOUS PARCELS. 14. Ordinance Amending Land Use Code reuarding Plot Plans, Conditional Use Permits and Public Use Permits (Continued from the meeting of February 22, 1994) RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94-__ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS AND PUBLIC USE PERMITS R:~lendai) 30884 6 14.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94~_. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS AND PUBLIC USE PERMITS. COUNCIL BUSINESS 15. Ordinance Esta blishino an Industrial Develooment Authority and Acceoting an Aoolication on Behalf of Tension Envelooe Corooration RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94-._ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, DECLARING THE NEED FOR AN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND DECLARING THAT SUCH AUTHORITY SHALL FUNCTION WITHIN THE CITY 15.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94--- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ON BEHALF OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ACCEPTING THE APPLICATION OF TENSION ENVELOPE CORPORATION 16. Allocation of Funds for Continued Conceot Study of Old Town Temecula Entertainment Center RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Approve an amendment to the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Temecula, the Temecula Redevelopment Agency and T.Z.B.G., Inc. (Zev Buffman) and allocating $125,000 from the Redevelopment Agency for use in researching the feasibility of a private/public partnership. 17. Consideration of Suooort for Suoolemental Bond Sale for Assessment District No. 159. (Placed on the agenda at the request of Councilmember Parks R:'~,Oeada~030894 8 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: March 22, 1994, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California R:'~e~enda~O308~l. 7 TE~E~ULA CO~UHIT'Y SERVICES ~I~TRI~T ~EETI~ - fie ~ he!U at 8:00) CALL TO ORDER: President Jeffrey E. Stone ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberts, Stone PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Award of Contract for Soorts Park Slooe Reoairs (Proiect No. PW 93-06CSD) RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Award a contract for the Sports Park slope repairs, Project PW 93-06CSD, to American Contracting, Inc. for $223,445.00 and authorize the President to execute the contract. 1.2 Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $22,344.50, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. 1.3 Appropriate $246,000.00to Account No. 210-166-648-5804. 1.4 Authorize a transfer of $246,000.00 from T.C.S.D. fund balance to the Capital Projects-Disaster Relief fund. Discussion of the Develooment of a Master Plan for the Parkview Site (Placed on the Agenda at the request of Mayor Pro Tem Stone and Councilmember Munoz) RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Provide direction to staff regarding preparation of a Master Plan of possible facilities and their locations as well as recreational uses of the City property known as the Parkview site. R:%Aeende~O~OSe4 8 GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting March 22, 1994, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California R:~eende~O3OBI4 9 TEMFCU~ A R;nLmV'FI ~PM~NT A~FNCY M~t~I"INP- CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Muftoz, Robarts, Stone, Parks PUBLIC COMMENT: AGENCY BUSINESS Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. 1. ApprOval Of Funding Mechanism for Soecial Studies -- Old Town Temecula Proiect RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve an amendment to the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Temecula, the Temecula Redevelopment Agency and T.Z.B.G., Inc. (Zev Buffman). 2.2 Approve an appropriation of $125,000 from the Redevelopment Agency fund balance to Account #280-199-999-5248for use in researching the feasibility of a private/public partnership. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting March 22, 1994, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California R:~,~ge~le~0308~4 10 ITEM 1 ITEM NO. 2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1994 A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:13 PM st the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Ron Roberts presiding. PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Roberrs ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Mufioz, Parks, Stone, Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and City Clerk June S. Greek. EXECUTIVE SESSION A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:37 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to adjourn to Executive Session pursuant to Government Code §54957.6 regarding Labor Negotiations and §54956.9(a)to discuss pending litigation regarding Pechanga Reservation v. City of Temecula; Lake Villages Homeowners Association v. City of Temecula; City of Temecula v. Fremont Financial; and Rancho Regional Shopping Center v. City of Temecula. The motion was unanimously carried. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Bishop Bob Ford, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilmember Stone. PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Mayor Ron Roberrs proclaimed February 13-19, 1994 to be "Toughlove Week". Linda Semet accepted the proclamation on behalf of Paul and Becky Jeffrey. She thanked the Mayor and City Council for the proclamation, and announced that Toughlove will be having a community information night, at Valley Christian Fellowship Church on February 17, 1994 at 7:30 PM. Mayor Roberrs proclaimed the month of February as "American Heart Month." Christine McCuster of Kid's World Preschool, along with Brittany Stone, Scott Swam, David Loyst and Loran Byrne received the proclamation. City Council Minutes February 8. 1994 Mayor Roberrs proclaimed February 26th and 27th as "1994 Rod Run Days". Frank Spencer accepted the proclamation and thanked the Council for their sponsorship. PUBLIC FORUM None given ........ CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Parks stated he attended a SCAG meeting last week, and reported the comprehensive plan deadline will probably be extended 30-60 days due to the earthquake. Mayor Robarts announced that the Local Government Commission presented an Ahwanee Community Design Award to the City of Temecula for the Village Center Concept in the newly adopted General Plan. He thanked Planning Director Gary Thornhill and Senior Planner John Meyer for their efforts. Director of Planning Thornhill thanked Mayor Robarts for his participation and said this award is important because it stresses quality of life as the most important design and planning consideration, which is what the City has been striving for. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Pro Tam Stone requested the removal of Item 6 from the consent calendar. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Stone to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-5 and 7-10. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Birdsall, Robarts None None Mu~oz, Parks, Stone, Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 City Council Minutes 2. e e e Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of January 25, 1994. Resolution Aooroving List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 February 8. 1994 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A City Treasurer's Report RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's report as of December 31, 1993. Acceptance of an Offer of Dedication and Acceptance Into the City-Maintained Street System - A Portion of Camoanula Way RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE OFFER OF DEDICATION AND ACCEPTING INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM, A PORTION OF CAMPANULA WAY Contract Change Orders No, 41 through No. 44 for Ynez Road Widening Project. PW9~--05. CFD 88-1 ~ RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve the final Contract Change Orders No. 41 through No. 44 for Ynez Road Widening Project, PW92-05 for labor and equipment for various items of work, in the amount of e2,397.62; 3 Ciw Council Minutes 7.2 February 8. 1994 Approve the transfer of funds between accounts .to fund the net adjustments made to the original contract quantities in the amount of $29,316.16. e Desion Services Contract - Ranr-hn CAlifornia Desiltation Lake Imorovement Proiect RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY 'COUNCIl. OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ENDORSING APPLICATION FOR AN URBAN STREAMS RESTORATION GRANT AND INSTITUTING APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW, CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTING GRANT IF OFFERED, AND DESIGNATING CONTRACT MANAGER AND FISCAL AGENT 8.2 8.3 Award contract of $18,500 to J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. for Preliminary engineering and the preparation of schematic design drawings for the Rancho California Desiltation Lake Improvement Project; Appropriate $19,000 to Account Number 001-163-999-5250 from General Fund fund balance. Comoletion and Acceotance of the Construction of the Old Town Temecula Senior Center - Proiect CSD 92-03 RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Accept the construction of the Old Town Temecula Senior Center, Project No. CSD92-03, as complete and direct the City Clerk to: File a Notice of Completion, release the performance bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond on the amount of 10% of the contract; Release the materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. "' City Council Minutes Febmaw 8. 1994 10. Fee Credits for Paloma Del Sol Park RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Approve an initial fee credit of $500,000 for Kernper Community Development Company for the construction and dedication of Paloma Del Sol Park. Out-of-State Travel Plans Mayor Pro Tem Stone asked that the allocations for Sister City trips be approved by the Council prior to travel. Councilmember Muf~oz asked that this item be continued until more specific cost break downs and justifications for out-of-state travel are given. Councilmember Parks suggested approving the travel scheduled for February 6-11 since it has already taken place. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Mut~oz to continue this Item until more detailed information is obtained. Councilmember Birdsall stated she would like to consider amending the motion, since the plans need to be made to attend the National League meeting in Washington, D.C. City Manager Dixon stated that one problem with continuing this item is that · three to four month lead is often needed to take advantage of discount airline tickets. Councilmember Muftoz asked if figures were in at this time for these conferences. City Clerk June Greek said she can presently fly to Alaska for $3401round trip. If the deadline of February 16th is missed, the I~rice jumps to 86721round trip. Councilmember I~luf~oz 'asked if this training can be obtained locally. City Clerk June Greek explained that in order to continue an advanced educational program for City Clerk's called an AAE, attendance at an international conference is required. Councilmember Parks stated based on the numbers ~luoted, he does not have a problem with approving this travel. Councilmember Parks withdrew his motion, Councilmember Munoz withdrew his second. 5 City Council Minutes February 8. 1994 It was moved by Counciimember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to approve staff recommendation to authorize certain travel plans for the National League of Cities, Public Works Training Seminar and International Institute of Municipal Clerks out of state travel, and directed staff to return with more detailed information regarding the remaining travel. The motion was unanimously carried, · PUBLIC HEARINGS 11. Old Town SPeCifiC Plan (Continued from the meeting of 1/25/94) Councilmember Mufloz asked that in the discussion of this item, language be added to the plan that addresses the Memorandum of Understanding that has been entered into with Zev Buffman, with some allowance to implementing this in the future. Mayor Pro Tem Stone and Councilmember Mut~oz disclosed a potential conflict of interest and removed themselves from the discussion. Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report and introduced Mark Broder, of Urban Design Studio, the consultant used to assist the City in the preparation of this plan. Mark Broder, outlined the proposed Old Town Specific Plan. Associate Planner Dave Hogan, reported that since the Planning Commission adopted the plan last June, a change has been made regarding sidewalk vending carts. He explained concerns were voiced by merchants that vending carts should not be located in the public right-a-way. In response to their concerns, staff met with a number of merchants and revised language is included that will alter the current section to allow vending carts on developed commercial property only. He also stated that in addition to the changes in the revisions addendum, staff recommended that the parking district be expanded to match boundary for the Tourist Retail Commercial Area, and noted a correction to Section 9 of the Ordinance to read "Subsection D. of Section 19.10". Mr. Hogan stated he also received a letter from Mr. Rumsey, regarding needs for additional study regarding circulation due to impacts from the proposed Zev Buffman project. Director of Planning Thornhill recommended including in the motion, that a policy referencing the Memorandum of Understanding with Zev Buffman be added to the Plan. Councilmember Birdsall expressed her concerns regarding wood walkways, due to past problems at the Rancho Plaza. Mr. Broder explained with proper installation and maintenance, problems could be minimized. 6 City Council Minutes Febru,,rv 8. 1994 Mayor Roberts opened the public hearing at 8:06 PM. Bonnie Reed, 42050 Main Street, spoke in favor of adoption of the Old Town Specific Ran, stating the community has put forth a lot of effort into this plan and it will be the foundation of Old Town's future. Smokey Williamson, 38815 Wayman, Sage, representing the Old Town Temecule Gun Fighters, spoke in favor of the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan. RECESS Mayor Roberts called a brief recess at 8:10 PM to change the tape. The meeting was reconvened at 8:11 PM, with Councilmember Muf~oz end Stone absent. Bill Harker, 31130 General Kearny Road, representing the Temecula Town Association, spoke in favor of the Old Town Specific Plan and asked for Council support. He also asked the Council to consider extension of the boundaries on both sides of Pujol Street and the area south of I st Street to 6th Street. Mayor Roberts closed the public hearing at 8:26 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to approve staff recommendations 11.1,11.2 and 11.3, with noted corrections in Section 9 to read "Subsection D. of Section 19.10." 11.1 Approve the Negative Declaration; 11.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN 11.3 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 9405 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING PORTIONS OF THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AND AMENDING CITY ORDINANCES 90-04, 92-16, AND 93-12 City Council Minutes February 8. 1994 The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mufioz, Stone Councilmember Birdsall asked if those currently serving on the Local Review Board will continue to serve on the Old Town Local Review Board. Associate Planner Dave Hogan explained that two existing members would continue to serve, two interim members would have their terms extended to same point,' and the City Clerk would advertise for positions to fill the vacancies. He stated that nothing would prevent previous members from rsapplyi~'t'~'fill'the'~acancies. It was moved by Counciimember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to approve staff recommendation 11.4, with an addition to attachment No. 3 of the Revisions Addendum to read "to .promote the development of Old Town in · manner to be consistent with the Memorandum of Understanding entered into by the City Council and Zav Buffman. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 3. COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Robarts NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Muf~oz, Stone It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to approve staff on 11.5 as follows: 11.5 Direct the City Clerk to advertise for positions on the Old Town Local ReView Board to begin the process of filling the vacancies on the Board. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to direct staff to refer the requested boundary change to the Planning Commission. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Robarts NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz, Stone 8 City Council Minutes February 8. 1994 RECESS Mayor Robarts called a brief recess st 8:25 PM to change the tape. The meeting was reconvened with all members present at 8:38 PM. ¸12. Plannino Aoolication No. 93-187, Amendment No. I - Aooeal (New Communitv Lutheran Church) Councilmember Parks announced he would abstain from this item due to a potential conflict of interest created by the close proximity of his residence to this site. Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report. Mayor Robarts asked Director of Public Works Serlet is there is a problem regarding vehicle stacking. Mr. Serlet explained that concern was expressed due to on-site traffic, however due to the length of the entrance corridor, this concern has been adequately addressed. Councilmember Stone asked if the proponents had agreed not to light the ball field. Director of Planning Thornhill explained that matter is not part of the proposal and would have to go back through the public hearing process. Mayor Robarts opened the public hearing at 8:51 PM. Louis Todd, 30645 Southern Cross Road, representing New Community Lutheran Church, spoke in favor of the staff recommendation to deny the appeal. He reported that the entire church-going community has united in support of this project. He introduced speakers to address the major areas of concern, which are traffic and parking. Paul Yelton, gave a brief history of the problems the church has encountered over the past several years in its effort to build a church and reported that $104,000 has been expanded to date. Fred Cheffay, 40245 Paseo Sereno, discussed the notification procedure and described how the church hand delivered 70 notices to make sure proper notification occurred. Karl Waiters, 39798 Amberly Circle, presented a petition containing 1,938 signature to the City Clerk. He stated the purpose of this petition is to demonstrate to the City Council the broad base of support for the project. He stated that he obtained 100% support from the churches in Temecula. Cris Wenthur, Wenthur & Chaches Attorneys at Law, spoke in favor of approval of the project, noting that historically churches have enjoyed a favored status relative to construction of new facilities. 9 City Council Minutes February 8, 1994 Mike Tylman, 28765 Single Oak Drive, spoke in favor of the project stating the development will help the current erosion and drainage problems on the site. Vince Didonato, Alhambra Group Architects, landscape consultant, addressed the positive elements of the landscape plan. Tim Holt, Holt Group Architects, discussed the advantages of the design elements for this project and discussed phasing. RECESS Mayor Roberrs called a recess at 9:21 PM to change tape. The meeting was reconvened at 9:22 PM. Pastor Don C. Presinger, 11446 Kayw0od Circle, Escondido, Interim Pastor of New Community Church, spoke in support of the project, and stated that it has been his experience that churches receive preferential treatment in other communities. He stated that non-profit organizations will be welcome to use the church for their activities and urged approval of the project. He asked those attending in support of the church to stand. Alberta Kovach, 15061 Zieglende Drive, Lake Elsinore, urged approval of the project. Robert Ford, 29715 Via Verde, spoke in support of New Community Lutheran Church listing benefits churches provide to a community. Greg LeBlanc, 39843 Amberly Circle, spoke in favor of the project. John Augustine, 30345 Colina Verde, spoke against the proposed project and presented the City Clerk with a petition containing 118 signatures of surrounding homeowners. He listed his major concerns as traffic and density. Evelyn Backstrom, 30498 Colina Verde, Windsor Crest, spoke in opposition to the project, asked that the Council deny this project and return the church to the original Los Ranchitos Site. Gary Patch, 43065 Vista Del Rancho, Windsor Crest project, stated the surrounding homeowners were opposed to Kemper's project on this site due to density generated traffic and the proposed 400 student day school will cause the same traffic problems. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, seconded by Councilmember Muf~oz to extend the meeting until 10:45 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. Marsha Slavin, 30110 La Primavera, spoke in opposition to the project and stated she believed this site would remain an open space passive park. She asked that the church be refunded for all fees paid out and this project be denied. Hector Demarchi, 30198 La Primavera, spoke in opposition to the project. 10 City Council Minutes February 8. 1994 RECESS Mayor Roberts called a brief recess at 10:20 PM to change the tape. The meeting was reconvened at 10:21 PM. Betsy Stubbs, 30263 Mira Loma, spoke in opposition to the project and stated she was under the assumption this property would remain s perk. Louis Todd, representing New Community Lutheran Church, shaking in rebuttal, urged approval of the project and asked that the Council adopt a pro-church policy and direct staff to meet with church leadership to re-evaluate the Public Use Permit process. Mayor Robarts closed the public bearing at 10:30 PM. Councilmember Mutioz spoke in favor of the project and stated he feels churches and schools are appropriate in residential areas wbere they are needed. He stated he believes all issues brought up have been sufficiently mitigated and this is an appropriate location for the project. Councilmember Birdsall stated she appealed the Planning Commission decision on this issue to allow all concerned citizens the opportunity to voice their opinion. Councilmember Stone stated be supports this project and feels the City does welcome churches in Temecula. He said Council and staff have worked hard with surrounding homeowners to address their needs and mitigate any problems with this project. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, seconded by Councilmember Muf~oz to extend the meeting until 11:25 PM. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Parks absent. Councilmember Mur~oz asked Planning Director Thornhill to explain why staff believes this is an appropriate site for this project. Mr. Thornhill explained an advantage of the site is very good buffering with a 1/4 mile distance and an up-hill elevation. Ha noted another advantage is being located on Pauba Road, an arterial, which will be able to carry the required traffic. Councilmember Birdsall stated that under the Conditions of Approval, Item 44, pg 19, the Rancho California Water District concurrence is not listed. Director of Planning Thornhill stated that would be added. 3,3. City Council Minutes It was moved by Councilmember Mufioz, approve staff recommendation as follows: seconded by Mayor February 8. 1994 Pro Tem Stone to 12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING THE APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-O187, AMENDMENT NO. 1, AND APPROVING THE PROJECT TO CONSTRUCT A CHURCH AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN RVE {5) PHASES TOTALLING APPROXIMATELY 43,197 SQUARE FEETOF BUILDING AREA LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PAUBA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 2,500 FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF YNEZ AND PAUBA ROADS ON A PORTION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 945-050-004 The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Parks abstaining. RECESS Mayor Roberrs called a recess at 11:09 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 11:25 PM with all members present. 13. Adootion of Temecula Municioal Code Mayor Roberrs opened the public hearing at 11:25 PM. Hearing no requests to speak, Mayor Roberts closed the public hearing at 11:25 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Muf~oz, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to approve staff recommendation as follows: 13.1 Conduct a public hearing to consider adoption of the Temecula Municipal Code and the following secondary codes: A. Riverside County Ordinances adopted by reference; B. Uniform Buildino Code, 1991 Edition with appendices in California State Amendments. C. Uniform Buildino Codes Standards, 1991 Edition D. Uniform Mechanical Code 1991 Edition, with appendices in California State Amendments. E. Uniform Plumbinq Code, 1991 Edition, with appendices in California State Amendments. F. Uniform Administrative Code, 1991 Edition. 12 City Council Minutes February 8. 1994 Ge Uniform Code for the Abatement of nannero.~ Buildir~s, 1991 Edition. Uniform Housina Code, 1991 Edition; and Uniform Swimmina Pools. Sea and Hot Tub Code, 1991 Edition. 13.2 Read by title only aod_aclopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE The motion was unanimously carried. COUNCIL BUSINESS 14. Stipulated Judgment Effectino Temecula RedeveloDment Aoencv 15. It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to approve staff recommendation as follows: 14.1 Approve and authorize the City Attorney to execute the "Interim Stipulation" in the case entitled Dawes v. City of Temecula, Riverside Superior Court Case No. 194468MF (consolidated with 194948.) The motion was unanimously carried. Lease of City Owned Property at 27612 Jefferson Avenue Assistant City Manager Woody Edvalson presented the staff report. Mayor Roberts asked if a provision is included in the lease which would allow only "on- site parking". Director of Planning Thornhill stated this would be conditioned to allow only on site parking. It was moved by Councilmember Mur~oz, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to approve staff recommendation as follows: 15.1 Approve the attached lease between the City of Temecula and Gary Michael Craig for use of City property at 27612 Jefferson Avenue. The motion was unanimously carried. 13 Ciw Council Minutes 16. Febmew 8. 1994 Specific Plan No, 164. Amendment No. ~ (PA93-0145)Rorioauoh Staff requested that this item be continued for two weeks. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Mui~oz to continue this item to the meetjng~fJ:-ebruary 22, 1994. The motion was unanimously carried. CITY MANAGER REPORT None given. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT None given. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Mufioz, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to adjourn at 11:35 PM to a meeting on February 22, 1994, 7:00 PM, Temecule Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk 14 ITEM NO. 3 RESOL~ON NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALTOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE C1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, D~ AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been audited by the City Manager, ~nd that the same are hereby allowed in the mount of $848,280.43 Section 2. The Ci~ Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. AFFROVED AND ADOFrED, this 8th day of March, 1994. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] Resos 06 I STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS crrY or 7 vmCULA) I, June S. ~, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 94- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 8th day of March, 1994 by the following roll call vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCK,MEMBERS: None COUNCILlVrF~MBERS: None COUNCK,MEMBERS: None June S. Greek, City Clerk P,~o, 06 2 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 02/17/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 02J24/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 03/08/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 02/24/94 TOTAL PAYROL.~ 18~,741 12~3,40e. Se 1050,125.33 Sl 15,003.80 TOTAL HST OF DEMANDS FOR 03/08/94 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 031 GENERAL 1414,206.23 103 GAS TAX tl8,4~1.~0 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 10.00 t90 TCSD 126,Tse.1e t91 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A - 13,111.72 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 818,08e.04 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 12,24&22 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 10.00 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) I17~0 250,.... TCSD-CIP t06.24 30. SELF-INSURANCE 310 VEHICLES S233./7 320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS 16,380.14 330 COPY CENTER 1281 340 FACIUTIES 1891.03 380 RDA-DEBT SEFNICE 10.03 PAYROLI~ 031 GENERAL (PAYROLL) 103 GAS TAX (PAYROLL) ~e.e4.1e 190 TC~D (PAYROLL) 115.82/.21 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A (PAYROLL) 1435.06 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C (PAYROLL) $1,719.94 300 8ELF-INSURANCE (PAYROLL) 1552.34 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PAYROLL) 330 COPY CENTER (PAYROLL) Me~S2 340 FACIUTIES TOTAL BY FUND: PREPARED BY KARMA MCINTYRE I, ,HEREBY CER11FY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. MARY JANE MCLARNEY, RNANCE OFRCER I, h~..,~LD E. BRADLEY, INTERIM CITY MANAGER , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE ANO CCRll;CT. llt5,003,03 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 02117/94 TOTAL CHECK BUN: 02/24/94 TOTAL CHECK BUN: 03/08/94 TOTAL CHECK BUN: 02124/94 TOTAL PAYROLL: $115,003.60 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 03/08/94 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL $414,286.23 1 O0 GAS TAX $18,4~1.50 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND I0.00 190 TCSD $26,75~.16 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A $5,t t 1.72 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B S18,0e~.04 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C $2,246,22 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D $5.00 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRQJ (CIP) $17,989.50 250 TCSD-CIP $58.~,4 280 RDA-CIP $225,060.75 300 SELF-INSURANCE $333.04 310 VEHICLES $233.77 320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS $5,380.14 330 COPY CENTER $281 340 FACILITIES 380 RDA-DEBT SERVICE $5.00 PAYROLL: 001 GENERAL (PAYROLL) $78,851.92 1 O0 GAS TAX (PAYROLL) $18,954.1 e 190 TCSD (PAYROLL) $15,827.21 1 gl TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A (PAYROLL) $435.06 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C (PAYROLL) $1,715.94 300 SELF*INSURANCE (PAYROLL) $552.34 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PAYROLL) $1,193.69 330 COPY CENTER (PAYROLL) $583.52 340 FACILITIES r/79.76 TOTAL BY FUND: PREPARED BY KARMA MCIN I, EBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TBUE AND CORRECT. I, "'~'~'~ ~L/.4 , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. RONALD E. BRADLEY, INTERIM CITY~(~R $115,003.60 $848,280.43 VOUcP""' PAGE O;t/1 15:/,6 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 CONNUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IIqPROVENENT PROJ FUND 250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD 280 REDEVELOPt4ENT AGENCY - 300 INSURANCE FUND 310 VEHICLES FUND 320 INFORNATIOR SYSTENS 330 COPY CENTER FUND :~0 FACILITIES TOTAL aT 38,/*22.20 5,286.01 1/~,977./,2 2,868.92 18,069.0~ 1,536.29 3,311.97 36.2/, 2,808.75 176.15 1,3~.80 ~8.01 VOUCHRE2 02/17/94 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUNBER 13729 13730 13731 13735 13736 13737 13738 13739 13740 13741 13742 13743 13744 13745 13745 13745 13745 13746 13747 13747 13748 13749 13749 13749 13749 13750 13750 13751 13751 13752 15:46 CHECK DATE 02/15/94 02/15/94 02/15/94 02/17/94 02/17/94 02/17/94 02/17/94 02/17/94 02/17/94 02/17/94 02/17/94 02/17/94 02/17/94 02/17/94 02/17/94 02/17/94 02/17/94 02/17/94 02/17/94 02/17/94 02/17/94 02/17/94 02/17/94 02/17/94 02/17/94 02/17/94 02/17/94 02/17/94 02/17/94 02/17/94 CITY OF TBECULA VOUCHER/CHECK HEGZSTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR NUNBER 000842 000824 001314 000101 000102 VENDOR ITEN NANE DESCRIPT[OR NATIONAL DATE FESTIVAL · 15 T]CI~TS FOR FESTIVAL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASS REGISTRAT]ON/SCAG/PARKS ANERICAN PLANNING ASSOC WORKSHOP LAND USE & TRA GOOD, JANAE TIPPS, JONI ACCURATE SIGNS WARD, PAUL APPLE ONE ANERICAN FENCE CO. OF C 000107 ALHAMBRA GROUP 000112 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC 000120 BICKNELL TRAVEL CENTER 000129 CAL WEST RENTAL CENTER 000137 CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. 000137 CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. 000137 CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. 000137 CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. 000152 CALIFORNIA PARKS & RECR 000155 DAVLIN 000155 DAVLIN 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS 000177 000177 000177 000177 000184 TCSD REFUND/GOOD, JANAE NILEAGE RE[NB/TIPPS, JO B/L REFUND-ACCURATE SIG BL REFUND/WARD° PAUL SMALL BUS LOANS LIASON TEMPORARY FENCE RENTAL DESIGN SERVICES PER ATT 083855 ANNUAL MEMBERSHI AIRFARE CHARGE TRENCHER RENTAL 789-819-697-2 GAS CARDS 789-819-697-2 GAS CARDS 789-819-697-2 GAS CARDS 789-819-697-2 GAS CARDS AQUATIC FACILITY COURSE AUDIO TAPE; PLANNING VIDEO/AUDIO CITY COUNC] FIELDNAN - FINANCE DEPT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT NISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT U.S. FLAGS; 5X8 GLENNIES OFFICE PRUDUCT CALIFORNIA FLAGS; 5X8 GLENN]ES OFFICE PRODUCT TAX GTE CALIFORNIA ZNCORPOR gOg-181-1123 000184 GTE CALIFORNIA [NCORPOR 90~-~-8632 000186 HANKS HARDgARE M]SC SUPPLIES AND EQUIP 000186 HANKS HARDYARE N]SC SUPPLIES AND EQUIP 000203 JOBS AVAILABLE, INC. JOE ANN. FOR SR. BLDG [ ACCOUNT NUMBER 19Q-183-999-5350 001-100-999-5258 001-161-999-5261 190-183-4982 001-140-999-5262 001-199-4056 001-199-4056 280-199-999-5250 190-180-999-52~8 280-199-805-5802 001-161-999-5226 001-161-999-5258 190-180-999-5258 001-110-999-5263 001-170-999-5262 001-161-999-5262 001-162-999-5263 190-180-999-5258 001-161-999-5250 001-100-999-5250 001-140-999-5230 001-140-999-5220 3330-199-999-5242 340-199-999-5242 3330-199-999-5242 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 001-150-999-5254 ITEM AII3UNT 60.00 60.00 165.00 45.00 272.40 35.00 35. O0 154.80 145.00 984,62 280,00 35.00 192.23 135.94 74.74 21.63 11 195,00 150.00 701.67 13.50 21,55 118,00 178.00 22,94 606,27 17,17 39,21 12.45 72.00 CRECK AMOUNT 60.00 60.00 165.00 45.00 272.40 35.00 35.00 154.80 145.00 984.62 28~0 243,65 195.00 851.67 13.50 3330.49 51.66 VOUClr". CiTY OF TENECULA 02/1 15:66 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOO$ PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR iTEN ACCOIJliT NUNBER DATE NUNBER NN4E DESCRIPTION NUNBER ITEH AletiNT CHECK ANOUNT 13753 02/17/96 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, i 3 REARS 190-193-999-5320 67.72 13754 02/17/94 000209 L & N FERTILIZER, INC. MISt. PARTS AND EQUIPfiE 190-180-999-5262 14.50 16.50 13755 02117/94 000210 LEAGUE OF CALIF.CITIE$ PLANNERS POCKET GUIDE 001-161-999-5228 24. O0 24.00 13756 02/17/94 000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING CATERING 2/15-2/16 CC H 001-100-999-5260 185.00 185.00 13757 02/17/94 000231 NBS/LOWRY, INC. CIVIL DESION & SIJRVEY 210-16&-627-5802 13757 02/17/94 000231 NBS/LOt~!Y, INC. LNtD SURVEYING 210-166-627-5802 170.00 670. O0 540.00 13758 02/17/96 000233 NELSON, SHAgN REill SKATEBOARD TOUR 210-190-137-5802 12.04 12.04 13759 02/17/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 001-110-999-5260 13759 02/17/96 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 001-150-999-5260 13759 02/17/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 001-161-999-5220 13759 02/17/96 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 001-162-999-5262 13759 02/17/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 001-163-999-5228 13759 02/17/96 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 001-163-999-5260 13759 02/17/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 001-163-999-5261 13759 02/17/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 320-199-999-5242 13~, ~2/17/96 000253 POSTMASTER 926662 EXPRESS MAIL/JAN 190-180-999-5230 13766' 02/17/94 000253 POSTMASTER 926/e62 EXPRESS MAiL/JAN 001-120-999-5230 13760 02/17/96 000253 POSTMASTER 92~2 EXPRESS MAIL/JAN 001-163-999-5230 13760 02/17/94 000253 POSTMASTER 92~662 EXPRESS MAIL/JAN 001-161-999-5230 15.36 40.10 16.60 50.00 10.00 30.00 41.86 21.90 9.95 7~.70 29.90 23.90 225.82 137.45 13761 02/17/94 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAR ADVERTISING JOBS 001-150-999-5256 111.63 111.63 13762 02/17/96 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER 01-06-29610-0 190-181-999-5260 13762 02/17/96 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER MATER USEAGE 190-180-999-5260 13762 02/17/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER MATER USEAGE 193-180-999-5260 13762 02/17/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER MATER USEAGE 191-180-999-5260 13762 02/17/94 000262 RANCHO CAL%FORN]A MATER MATER USEAGE 193-180-999-5240 13762 02/17/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER WATER USEAGE 193-180-999-5260 10.60 1,0~9.80 521.91 97.32 656.60 54.63 2,620.66 13763 02/17/94 000266 RIGHTWAY RENT ON PORTABLE TOILET 100-16~-999-5238 57.39 57.39 13764 02/17/94 000270 RJN DESIGN GROUP, INC. RJH DESIGN GROUP 250-190-129-5802 13765 02/17/94 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE BLDG INSPECTOR JOB ANNO 001-150-999-5254 36.26 265.35 36.24 265.35 13766 02/17/94 000285 SIR SPEEDY 13766 02/17/94 000285 SIR SPEEDY GOLD FOIL STATIONARY; C 001-110-999-5220 TAX 001-100-999-5220 26.97 2.10 13767 02/17/94 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T LOF B&S VEHICLE 310-162-999-5214 13767 02/17/94 000291 SPEE OEE OIL CHANGE & T OIL CHANGE - PUBLIC NOR 310-164-999-5214 20.99 30.70 13768 02/17/94 000294 STATE COHPENSATIOR INS. MORKERS' COHP. FEB 96 001-2370 13~/'~ 02/17/94 00029~ STATE CONPENSATIOR INS. tIIRKERS' CONP. FEB 9~ 100-2370 13 32/17/94 000294 STATE CONPENSATZOR INS. WORKERS' CONP. FEB 9~ 190"2370 7,216.55 4,202.11 2,907.39 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA 02/17/94 15:46 VOUCHER/CHEC~ REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ~4 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEN ACCC)UNT NUNBER DATE NI. JNBER MANE DESCRIPTION NUNBER ITEM AN(XJt/T CHECK ANOUNT 13768 02/17/94 00029~ STATE COMPENSATIN INS. gORICERS' COMP. FEB 9~ 191-2370 13768 02/17/96 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS. gORKERS* CONP. FEB 94 193-2370 13768 02/17/94 000294 STATE CONPENSATION INS. MORKERS' CCNP. FEB 9~ 300-2370 13768 02/17/94 000294 STATE CONPENSATZON INS. gORKERS' COle. FEB 94 320-Z~70 13768 02/17/94 000294 STATE C(IIPENSATION INS. MORKERS' COle. FEB 94 330-2370 13768 02/17/94 000294 STATE C(IIPENSATIOR INS. IJORICERS' COI4P. FEB 9~ 340-2370 13768 02/17/94 000294 STATE CONPENSATION INS. gORICERS' CCMP. FEB 9~ 001-1182 13769 02117/9~ 000]02 SYSTEN SOURCE, INC. K-O TYPING STAND 340-199-999-5219 13769 02/17/9~ 000302 SYSTEN SOURCE, INC. FREIGHT 340-199-999-5219 13769 02/17/94 000302 SYSTEN SOURCE, INC. TAX 340-199-999-5219 191.98 273.35 19.74 48.24 21.76 292.58 30.56 150.00 .01 11.62 15,202.26 161.63 13770 02/17194 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & PVC RED. BUSH. 190-180-999-5212 75.67 73.67 13771 02/17/94 000320 TOgliE CENTER STATIONERS NISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-10]-999-5220 13771 02/17/94 000320 TOgtiE CENTER STATIONERS NISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-16~-999-5220 13771 02/17/94 000320 TOgliE CENTER STATIONERS NISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-163-999-5220 ~5.54 37.60 94.~ 227.42 13772 02/17/94 000322 UNIGLOBE BUTTERFIELD TR CREDIT FOR TICKETS 13772 02/17/94 000322 UNIGLOBE BUTTERFIELD TR BIRDSALL AIRFARE-D.C. 001-100-999-5258 001-100-999-5258 1377'~ 02/17/94 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 2 SETS OF UNIFOR~S CLEA 100-164-999-5243 13775 02/17/94 000326 UNZTOG RENTAL SERVICE UR]FONH RENTAL AND CLEA 190-180-999-5243 13775 02/17/94 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORN RENTAL AND CLEA 190-180-999-5243 13775 02/17/94 000326 UNZTOG RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORN RENTAL AND CLEA 190-180-999-5243 150.00- 451.00 23.00 16.10 18.25 16.10 301.00 73.45 13774 02/17/94 000339 IJEST PUBLISHING CONPANY CA CO AN-GEN IND 8V 001-120-~-5228 72.81 72.81 13775 02/17/94 000350 ELHO, ANTHONY 13776 02/17/94 000359 PARKER, HERRAN REINB CALBO ANNUAL MTG 001-162-999-5258 REINB SKATEBOARD TOUR 210-190-137-5802 17.40 38.16 17.40 · 38.16 13777 02/17/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 12/30/93-1/31/94 191-180-999-5319 13777 0Z/17/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 08/12/93-09/01/93 191-180-999-5319 13777 02/17/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALZF EDISON 09/01/93-10/04/93 191-180-999-5319 13777 02/17/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 10/04/93-11/01-93 191-180-999-5319 13777 0Z/17/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALZF EDISON 11/01/93-12102/93 191-180-999-5319 13777 02/17/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 12/30/93-01/27/94 191-180-999-5319 13777 02/17/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 12/02/93-12/31/93 191-180-999-5319 13777 02/17/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 01/05/9~-02/02/94 191-180-999-5319 13777 02/17/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 01/05/94-02/02/94 191-180-999-5319 13777 02/17/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALZF EDISON 01/06/We-O2/0]/We 191-180-999-5319 13778 02/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL ~:39-202-4757 JAN JG 001-120-~99-5208 13778 02/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL ~0~-202-4758 JAN RR 001-100-g99-5208 13778 02/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL 909-202-4759 JAN TE 001-162-~99-5208 13778 02/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL f09-202-476~ JAN PB 001-100-~99-5208 13778 02/17194 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL ~0~-202-47~8 JAN JS 001-100-~-5208 13778 02/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CAL]FONNIA TEL 909-202-4770 JAN DD 001-110-~-5208 13778 02/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL 90~-202-5153 JAN GY 001-110-~-5208 13778 02/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL ~0~-202-4751 JAN TS 100-164-~99-5208 48.98 115.29 190.19 161.44 170.68 162.38 161.4x, 32.24 I:~S 196.59 45.~6 53.22 43.16 39.98 68.15 231.65 134.12 58.19 1,38~,06 VOUCHr'''~ PAGE 5 02/1; 15:/,6 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUNHER DATE NUI4BER 13778 02/17/94 000375 13778 02/17/9/* 000375 13778 02/17/9/* 000375 1377'8 02/17/9/, 000375 13778 0Z/17/94 000375 13778 02/17/9/, 000375 137"78 02/17/9/, 000375 13778 02/17/9/, 000375 13778 02/17/94 000375' 13778 02/17/9/, 000375 137'/'9 02/17/94 000387 13780 02/17/94 000398 13781 0Z/17/9/, O00/,Og 13781 02/17/9/, 000/*09 13781 02/17/94 000/,09 13781 02/17/94 00040~ 13781 02/17/9/, 000/*0~ 137'/"'~2/17/94 000/,27 137~ j2/17/94 000/*27 13783 02/17/94 000/,82 1378/, 02/17/94 000519 13785 02/17/9/, 000521 1378~ 02/17/9A 000526 13787 02/17/9A 000537 13787 02/17/94 000537 13787 02/17/94 000537 13787 02/17/9~ 00053? 13787 02/17/9~ 00053? 13787 02/17/94 00053? 13787 02/17/94 00053? 13787 02/17/94 00053? 13787 02/17/9~ 0O053? 13787 02/17/9A 00053? 13787 02/17/9~ 00053? 13787 02/17/94 00053? 13787 02/17/9/, 00053? 13787 02/17/94 00053? 13787 02/17/9~ 00053? 13787 02/17/94 00053? 13787 02/17/94 0O0537 137~-02/17/94 00053? 13: )2/17/9~ 000537 VENDC~ NH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL SOUTHERN CAL]FORNIA TEL SOUTHERN CAL]FORN]A TEL SOUTHERN CALIFORN]A TEL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL CAREER TRACK SEHINARS H CALIFORNIA HUN]C]PAL VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY VALLEH SAFETY SUPPLY VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY ARTESIA IMPLEMENT ARTESIA IMPLEMENT LEZGHTOR & ASSOCIATES SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR STEUART, BRUCE M. U,C, REGENTS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI SOIJTHERN CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EOI SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED! SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED! SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI SOUTHERN CALIFORHIA EDI SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI CITY OF TEHECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER/OD$ ITEM DESCRIPTION 909-202-/.762 JAIl RP 909-202-/.76/, JAN BLAZER 909-202-/.765 JAN BB 909-202-/.767 DEC GT 909-202-/.204 UE 909-202-/.753 BH 909-202-/.75A KH 909-202-/.755 VAN 909-202-/.756 TH 909-202-/.760 MATERIALS FOR '(SO STAFF HEMBERSHIP MJM & GR TUIN CARTRIDGE ADAPTER TERMINAL SPILL KIT 1112 FRE I GHT TAX COVERALL U/ATTACHED H0O REPAIR OF TCED TRACTON REPAIR OF TCSD TRACTOR GRADING & MATERIALS TES MONTHLY APPLICATION OF PM f'Z1098 (CHURCH) SAFETY THROUGH HAINT CL 12/31/~3-1/31/94 12/31/93-1/31/9/, 12/31/93-1/31/94 12/31/93-1/31/94 12/31/93-1/31/94 12/31/93-1/31/94 12/31/93-1/31/9/, 12/31/93-1/31/94 12/31/93-1/31/9~ 12/31/93-1/31/9/, 12/31/~3-1/31/94 12/31/~3-1/31/94 12/31/~3-1/31/9/, 12/31/93-1/31/94 11//,/93-1/31/94 12/31/93-1/31/94 12/31/93-1/31/94 12/31/93-1/31/9/, 12/31/93-1/31/94 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-100-;-5208 100-1~.-;-5208 100-1&G-;-5208 001-161-;-5208 001-110-;-5208 190-180-999-5208 190-180-9~-5208 190-180-9f9-5208 320-1W-999-5208 320-1~-~-5208 190-180-~-5228 001-1/,0-~-5226 100-164-999-5218 100-1(~.-~-5218 100-16/,-999-5218 100-1~-999-5218 100-16/*-999-5218 310-180-;-521/, 310-180-999-5214 210-166-627-5802 190-181-ggg-5250 001-162-99~-5250 001-163-999-5261 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 192-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180~999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 ITEM AMOUNT 66.08 /*8.33 /,.6 82.69 52.35 /.1 ~8.13 37.65 35 37.:3~ /,3.05 75.00 67.96 166.85 7.69 12.93 142.2/, 15.51 89.58 2,356.62 29.00 60.00 100.00 41.76 27.85 20.53 21.02 /,0.69 8.78 40.69 44.48 39.7/, 46.81 45.80 ~,5.92 46.75 43.83 18,069.06 48.24 42.18 42.75 118.55 CHECK A!4OUNT 1,170.01 43.05 75.00 397.67 105.09 2,356.62 29.00 60.0O 100.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA 02/17/96 15:66 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS P~"~6 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUHBER DATE NLIBER NAME DESCR]PTIOR NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK 13787 02/17/9~ 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED! 12/31/93-1/31/9/, 191-180-999-5319 13787 02/17/9~ OOO53? SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 12/31/93-1/31/9/, 191-180-999-5319 13787 02/17/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 12/31/93-1/31/94 191-180-999-5319 13787 02/17/94 O0053? SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 12/31/93-1/31/9~ 191-180-999-5319 13787 02/i?/94 OOO53? SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDZ 12/31/93-1/31/9~ 191-180-~q9-5319 13787 02/17/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 11/30/93-12/31/93 191-180-999-5319 13787 02/17/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[ 12/31/93-1/31/96 191-180-999-5319 13787 02/17/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 12/31/93-1/31/96 191-180-999-5319 13787 02/17/94 000537- SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 12/31/93-1/31/94 191-180-999-5319 37.00 ?2.07 50.19 33.21 102.87 28.?4 30.17 31.07 19,26~.60 13788 02/17/94 000587 NUNOZ, NARION. JANITORIAL SERVICES FOR 190-181-999-5250 200.00 200.00 13789 02/17/94 000662 CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX REIB FLEX BENEFZT 001-1020 13789 02117/94 000662 CITY OF TENECULA - FLEX REIB FLEX BENEFIT 190-1020 13789 02/17/94 000642 CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX REIB FLEX BENEFIT 100-1020 13789 02117/94 000662 CITY OF.TEMECULA - FLEX REIB FLEX BENEFIT 300-1020 13789 02/17/94 0006/,2 CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX REIB FLEX BENEFIT 330-1020 3,050.71 726.66 50.00 21.25 16,25 3,8~.87 13790 02117/94 000666 MALT RANKIN & ASSOCIATE 112-587 EXIT SECTION (L 13790 02117194 000666 MALT RANKIN & ASSOCIATE 978-942 LEGS FOR EXIT S 13790 02117/94 000664 MALT RANKIN & ASSOCIATE 104~ HEX BOLTS 13790 02/17/94 000664 MALT RANKIN & ASSOCIATE 117001 1/4" FLAT MASHER 13790 02117194 000664 MALT RANKIN & ASSOCIATE 117003 5/1&' FLAT MASHE 13790 02117/94 000664 MALT RANKIN & ASSOCIATE 286 SLASH PROOF SEAT 13790 02117/94 000664 MALT RANKIN & ASSOCIATE 280 STURD]-GRIP HANGER 13790 02117194 000(~ MALT RANKIN & ASSOCIATE FREIGHT 13790 02/17/94 000666 MALT RANKIN & ASSOCIATE TAX 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 130.00 22.00 5,25 1.50 3.00 138,00 90.00 35.48 3.21 428.~ 13791 02/17/94 000724 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI SATIN JACKETS 190-183-~-5380 978.37 9?8.37 13792 02/17/94 000?28 RANSEY BACKFLOM & PLUMB BACKFLOg PREVENTION DEV 190-180-999-5250 80.00 80.00 13793 02/17/94 000731 NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP HOU TO MANAGE PROJECTS 001-163-~-5261 98.00 98.00 13794 02/17/94 000740 PICCA DELl LABOR RELATIONS TRAININ 001-150-~-5260 101.02 101,02 13795 02/17/94 000745 AT & T - CELLULAR 619-987-1828-1 JAN NJM 001-140-999-5208 10.36 10.36 13796 02/17/94 000734 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE PA 93-0030 MIDNIGHT RD- 001-1270 100.00 100.00 13797 02/17/94 000775 NUNIMETR]X SYSTEMS CORP ANNUAL NAINT 320-199-999-5211 480.00 480,00 13798 02/17/94 000781 ASSOC. OF ENVIROIiEMTAL WORKSHOP/JAN 24, 96 CR 001-161-999-5261 13798 02/17/94 000781 ASSOC, OF ENVIROIdlENTAL MEMBERSHIP/DAVE HOGAN 001-161-999-5226 105.00 80.00 185.00 13799 02/17/94 000797 HARTLEY, BRUCE REIMB SKATEBOARD TOUR 210-190-137-5802 24.53 24.53 13800 02/17/94 0008~2 NATIONAL DATE FESTIVAL 15 ADMISSION TICKETS 190-183-999-5350 60.00 13801 02/17/94 000873 RORERTS, RONALD H. LOCAL GOVNT CONF IN SAN 001-100-999-5258 87.26 13801 02/17/94 000873 RORERTS, RONALD H. RE[MB CA CONTR CITIES 0 001-100-999-5258 22.60 VOUCH/r" CITY OF TENECULA 02/12 15:66 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEN ACCOUNT NUIiER DATE NUIiER NAME DESCRIPTION NUliER 13802 02/17/94 000878 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB DRAg #17 001-1500 13803 02/17/96 000915 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIA NEI4BERSHZP/GREEK, JONES 001-120-999-5226 13804 02/17/94 000919 TENEOULA VALLEY UNIFIED UTILITIES-ELEN SCHOOL P 190-180-999-57.~0 13805 02/17/9/, 0009/*9 GKN RENTALS EOUIP RENTAL 100-16/*-999-5238 13806 02/17/9~ 000965 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CI 2/:r~/9~ NEET]NG 001-100-999-5258 13807 02/17/9~ 000992 RANONA TIRE, INC. LOF B&S VEHICLE 310-162-999-521/, 13808 02/17/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5473666/*03910057 JAN $N 190-180-999-57.60 13808 02/17/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5473666~03910057 JAN SN 190-180-999-5258 13808 02/17/96 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE DANK - 547'~16~03910115 JAN JG 001-120-999-5258 13808 02/17/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5/,734566/,03910149 TS 001-163-999-5260 13809 02/17/94 001029 DATE QUICK INFORMATION DATAQUICK INFORNATION S 320-199-999-5250 13810 02/17/94 001076 lIESTERN MASTE, INC. JANUARY RENTAL 190-180-999-5238 13&~"~'2/17/94 001089 CALIFORNIA DEBT ADVISOR FUND OF DEBT FINANCING/001-1/,0-999-5261 13812 02/17/94 001090 CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF GEN CALIF BOOK OF LISTS '9/* 001-161-999-5228 13813 02/17/94 001142 MARKHAM & ASSOCIATES 13816 02/17/96 001160 PACTEL CELLULAR-LA 13815 02/17/94 001193 CONP USA, INC. 13816 02/17/94 001209 VAULT, THE ENGINEERING SERVICES AS 190-180-999-5250 6015202 TEAC 1.2 FLOPPY DRIVE COURIER & HANDLING 13817 02117196 001212 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS 12/16/93-1/18/9~ 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5221 001-120-999-5250 190-181-999-52/,0 13818 02/17/94 001222 ALPHA COIINN[CAT[ONS, I IqONTHLY SERVICE RENTAL 19()-180-999-5238 13818 02/17/94 001222 ALPHA CClIUNICAT[ONS, I NONTHLY SERVICE RENTAL 001-162-999-5238 13818 02/17/94 001222 ALPHA COIIUNICATIONS, ! NONTHLY SERVICE RENTAL 320-199-999-5238 13818 02/17/94 001222 ALPHA COI,!I. INICATIONS, I IONTHLY SERVICE RENTAL 100-1(~-999-5238 13818 02/17/94 001222 ALPHA COlelUNICATIONS, ! NONTHLY SERVICE RENTAL 001-170-999-52/,2 13818 02/17/94 001222 ALPHA COIIUNICATIONS, ! NONTHLY SERVICE RENTAL 001-140-999-5250 JAN USEAGE CHARGES 320-199-999-5228 13819 02/17/96 001275 COMPUSERV, INC. 13820 02/17194 001292 GRAPHIC EMBROIDERY OF T RECREATION STAFF UNIFOR 190-180-999-5243 13820 02/17/96 001292 GRAPHIC EMBROIDERY OF T TAX 1~0-180-999-52/,3 13821 02/17/9/* 001308 WILSHZRE ESCROM CO. CLOSING COSTS HONDA PRO 280-1700 REIMB SKATEBOARD TOUR 210-190-137-5802 1387"'-02/17/94 001309 RUSE, PHYLLIS ITEN AMOUNT 22,z~1.69 39. O0 5,508.29 156.20 54. O0 19.37 9.43 313.63 68. O0 1.00 12.62 455.00 125.00 9.00 127.50 50.84 62.63 20.00 30~. 05 99.00 33. O0 11.00 62.~, 18.33 7.33 13.95 552.00 42.78 1,669.33 28.75 PAGE 7 CHECK AMOUNT 22,4j~1.69 39.00 5,508.29 156.20 54. O0 19.37 12.62 455. O0 125.00 9.00 127.50 62.43 20. O0 30~. 05 Z31.00 13.95 594.78 1,669.~'5 28.75 VOUCHRE2 '~ 8 021171~ 15:~6 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUNSER 13823 1382,~ 13825 13826 13827 13828 CHECK DATE 0211719A 02/17/9~ 02/17/94 02117194 VENDOR NUNBER 001310 001311 001312 001313 001315 001316 VENDOR NANE HILLER, HENRY HANGUSING, STUART LANCASTER, CITY OF FAGAN, HATTHEW CURRELL, HIKE STANDARD[, PAT CITY OF TENEOULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER]OUS /TEN ACCOUNT DESCR]PTION NUNBER RE!II SKATEBOARD TOUR REIN8 BOOTS 210'1~0-137-5802 100-1&~,-~-52/,3 URBAN STRUCTURE I~ 001-161-999-5228 PILLOU FOR CHAIR REZMB FOR BOOTS REINB FOR NOTANY SERVIC 001'161-999-5220 100-164-999-52./,3 190-180-999-5250 TOTAL CHECKS ITEN 11.87 89.38 13.50 10.00 95.00 20.00 CHECK ANOUNT 11.87 89.38 13.50 10.00 95.00 2 0. O0 voucxP, P~ PACE OZ/?6'. 16:16 CZTY OF TEHECULA VOUCHER/CHECk: REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FIJND 190 COleIJNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 280 REDEVELONNT AGENCY - CIP 300 iNSURANCE FUND 310 VEHICLES FUND 320 iNFORHATIOR SYSTEHS 330 COPY CENTER FUND 340 FACILITIES TOTAL Ale3UNT 55,5:34,.61 9,373.69 8,511.74 242.80 709.93 216,352.00 292.05 57.62 1,866o96 24~ .88 293,409.56 VOUCHRE2 02/24/9/, VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 317202 317202 317202 317202 317202 317202 317202 317202 317202 317202 317202 317202 317202 317202 317202 317202 317202 362227 362227 362227 362227 362227 362227 362227 362227 362227 ]62227 362227 362227 362227 362227 362227 362227 362227 13832 13833 1383~ 13835 13836 13836 13836 13836 13836 138,36 138,36 1/,:16 CHECK DATE 0212/,/94 02/24/W, 02124194 02/24/94 02/24/94 02/24/9/, 02/24/9/, 02124194 02/2/,/9/* 02/2/,/94 02/2/,/94 02/24/9/, 02/24/9/* 02/24/94 02/24/9/* 02/24/9~ 02/24/94 02/2/,/~4 02/2/*/9/* 02/2/*/9/* 02/2/,/94 .02/24/94 0212/,/9/, 02/2/*/96 0212/,19/, 0212419/* 02/2/,/~4 0212419/* VENDO~ NUMBER 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 00028;3 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000127 000165 000177 000180 000180 000180 000180 000180 000180 000180 VENDOR NAME FIRSTAX (EDO) FIRST,eX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (F, DO) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (B)D) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) fiRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (El)D) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX CIRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) fiRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IR$) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (ZRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) ADAHS, EVELYN CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL FEDERAL EXPRESS GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COltPAN GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN CiTY OF TEHECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERICOS ITEM DESCRIPTION 000/~ SO l 0004~ 000/,64 000444 000/~ 00~ 00~ 00~ 00~ 00~ $TA~ 00~ STATE 00~ STATE 000~ STATE ~ STATE 00~ STATE ~ STATE 0~ STATE 00028~ FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 00028~' FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 MEDZCARE 000283 NED Z CARE 000265 NED I CARE 000Z8~ NED Z CARE 00028~ NED l CARE 000283 NED I CARE 00028~ NEDICARE 000283 NED I CARE 00028~ NED I CARE ADANS,EVELYN/REFUND FEE 1 111 SUBSCRIPTION NAIL/BUILDING & SAFETY COPYSETS SIEMON S-8fO BRACKET SIENON S~1'50 WIRING DRA10176-O00 88/110 BLA AT&T 10516/,867 8P8C DAT FREIGHT TAX SIENON MC4LH-/, COVER - ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-20/0 1 O0 - Z070 1~0-2070 191-2070 193-2070 300-207O 320-2070 330-2070 3~0-2070 001-2070 100-2070 1~0-2070 191-2070 193-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-Z070 001-2070 100-2070 1~0-2070 191-2070 193-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 001-2070 100-2070 190-2070 191-2070 193-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2650 190-180-999-5228 001-162-999-5230 001-170-999-5220 320- 320-1~9-~9-52/,2 320-1~-;-5242 320-1~-;-5242 )20-1W-~9-5262 320-1~9-999-5242 ITEM AMOUNT 1,274.75 285.37 255 7.66 27.47 9.15 10.25 11 3,639./*2 666.67 20,96 25 ,~ 55,29 15,71 15,682.19 2,~2.~ 2,178.61 82.55 ~5.~ ~.87 2~6.~ ~.27 3,019.65 B6.~ 570.7~ 17.07 61.29 20.~ 54.~ 24.~ 200.00 /*8.00 18.00 39,05 23.0~ 98.5O 16.96 32.30 5.f9 13.26 77.52 CHECK AHOIJNT 6,8A2.71 200.00 4,8.00 18.00 39.05 16:16 CiTY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECIC NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NLIIER VENDOR NAHE ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER -- iTEM AMOUNT CHECK k~UNT 13836 13836 13836 13836 13836 13836 02/26/96 02/26/96 02/26/96 02/26/96 02/26/96 02/26/96 000180 000180 000180 000180 000180 000180 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CCXePAN GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COlePAll GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COlePAR GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPAN Slrr. JeON HC6LH-6 COVER - FREIGHT TAX S[EMON HC~LH-5 COVER - FREIGHT TAX 320-199- 999- 5262 320-199-999-5262 :320-199-999-5262 320-199-999-5262 320-199-999-5262 320-199- 999 - 5262 16.32 5.16 7.28 27.20 6.58 2.11 330.50 13837 13837 13837 13837 02/26/96 02124196 02/26/96 02/26/96 000192 000192 000192 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLZE GLOBAL CONI}UTER SUPPL[E GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLZE GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLZE C920(o DOD-120NAA/dqN T 320-199-999-5221 C57'W, DATA STORA6E CUBE 320-199-9~-522.1 FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221 TAX 320-19~-9~-5221 365.25 29.85 9.57 31.15 635.82 13838 13838 13838 13838 13838 13838 13838 13839 138A0 138,4.0 138/.0 138/.0 13840 1384,0 13840 13840 138A0 138~0 1384,0 138~0 '138~0 1384.0 13840 13840 13840 138~0 13860 13841 13861 13841 13841 13841 138~1 1 02/26/94 02/24/94 02/24/~. 02/26/96 02/24/94 02/26/96 02/26/94 02/26/96 02/26/96 02/26/96 02/26/96 02/24/94 02/24/94 02/26/96 02/24/94 02/26/94 02/24/94 02/24/94 02/26/96 02/26/96 02/24/96 02/26/~. 02/26/96 02/24/96 02/26/~. 02/26/96 02/26/~. 02/26/94 02/26/96 02/24/96 02/26/96 02/26/96 02/26/96 02/24/96 02/26/~, 02/24/96 000196 000196 000196 000196 00019~ 000196 000196 000216 000266 000266 000266 000266 0002~6 0002/,(> 000266 0002/,6 O002U) 000266 000266 000266 000266 0002/,6 0002/,6 0002~6 0002/,6 000266 000246 000266 000269 000249 000269 000269 000269 000249 000269 000249 IC34A RETIREMENT TRUST IC34A RETIREHENT TRUST IC34A RETIREMENT TRI~T ICll~ ~TIREMENT TROT ICI4A RETIREMENT TROT ICMA RETIRERENT TRUST ICI4A RETIREMENT TROT LUNCH & STUFF CATERING PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRF. H PERS EHPLOYEES' RETIREM PERS EHPLOYEES' RETIREH PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REN PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REH PERS EHPLOYEES' RETIREH PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REN PERS EHPLOYEES' RETIREH PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREH PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REH PERS EI4PLOYEES~ RET]REN PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REM PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REH PERS EMPLOYEES~ RET]REN PERS EHPLOYEES' RETIREH PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREH PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREH PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 00019~ DEF COle 001-2080 00019~ DEF CCHP 100'2080 00019/, DEF CONP 190'2080 O001(X. DEF COI4P 191-2080 000194, DEF Cae 193-2080 000196 DEF ~ 300-2080 00019~ DEF CCNP 3~0-2080 COUNCIL I,n'G. 001-100-999-52&0 000266 PER REDE 001-2130 000246 PER REDE 100-2130 000Z46 PERS RET 001-2390 000246 PERS RET 100-2390 000266 PERS RET 190-2390 000246 PERS RET 191-2390 000266 PERS RET 193-2390 0002~ PERS RET 300-2390 0002~6 PERS RET 320-2390 000246 PERS RET ~0-2390 0002~6 PERS RET 34,0-2390 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390 000246 SURVIVOR 100-2390 0002~ SURVIVOR 190-23f0 O00246 SURVIVOR 191-2390 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390 0002/,6 SURVIVOR 320-2390 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390 000246 SURVIVOR 360-2390 PETTY CASH 001-100-999-5220 PETTY CASH 001-1~0-999-5260 PETTY CASH 001-150-999-5265 PETTY CASH 001-150-999-5260 PETTY CASH 001-110-999-5258 PETTY CASH 360-199-999-5262 PETTY CASH 001-110-999-5260 PETTY CASH 001-162-999-5261 1,607.93 567.35 /,87.18 36.08 61.66 25.36 50.00 80.00 107.35 107.35 11,165.38 2,695 2,629.78 80.06 28~.39 93.9~ 232.35 10~.86 122.01 12.32 12.92 1.~. .93 .93 12.18 29.57 10.72 6.99 8.00 10.32 12.66 12.00 2,813.56 ~.~ 17,686.91 VOUCHRE2 Ir'~3 02/26/96 16:16 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 1384,1 13861 138/,.1 1384,1 13861 138~1 1:38~1 13862 13843 1:384~ 13845 13846 13847 138~8 13~9 138~9 13869 13850 13851 13852 13852 13853 1385/, 13856 13855 13855 13855 13856 13856 13857 13858 13859 13859 CHECK DATE 02/26/9/, 02/26/9~ 02/26/9/, 02/26/9/, 02/26/96 02/26/9~ 02/26/~6 02/26/96 02/26/~ 02/26/96 02/26/~ 02/26/96 02/26/96 02/26/~ 02/26196 02/26/96 02/26/96 02/26/96 02/26/96 02/26/96 02/26/96 02/24/96 02/24/96 02/26/96 02/26/96 02/26/96 02/26/96 02/26/9/. '02/26/W, 02/26/~. 02/26/96 02/26/96 02/26/96 VENDOR litleER 000269 000269 000269 000269 000249 000249 000269 000255 000262 000271 000282 000309 000321 000322 000325 000325 000325 000333 000339 000366 000:)68 0003?5 0003?5 000389 000389 000369 000518 000580 000580 CITY OF TEHECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR ITEN MANE DESCRIPTION PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PRO LOCK &'KEY EMERGENCY REPAIR RANCHO CALIFORNIA HATER INSTALL METERS ROBERT BEIN, ta4 FROST & PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERIN SCMAF SOFTBALL REGISTRATION TEMECULA COPIERS HASTE COLLECTOR UBNOSKE, DEBB[E TUITION REIMB. UNIGLO6E BUTTERFIELD TR AIRFARE/CONFERENCE MAR UNITED HAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UN UNITED HAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UN UNITED HAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UN gALL STREET JOURNAL I YEAR SUBSCRIPTION VEST PUBLISHING COHPANY CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE-9 HARRINGTUN, KEVIN HARRINGTUN, KEVIN YORKBOOT REIMB. WORKSHOP MCCAVP. AN , LOR I ANN CPRS CONFERENCE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL 909-202-6206/~E SOUTHERN CALIFONN]A TEL 909-202-6752/SN USCM/PEBSCO, (ORRA) 00038~ PT RETIR USCM/PEBSCO, (ORRA) 000389 PT RET]R USCH/PEBSOD, (0eRA) 000389 PT RETIR SIERRA COffiuUTER SYSTEMS CONFERENCE/TH SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS CONFERENCE/IN HCLARNEY, HARY JANE 01/26-01/28 CALED CONE DEL RIO CARE AMIHAL HOS VETERINARY K'9 PHOTO I~ORKS PHOTO tJORKS MISC. FlU4 AND PROCESSI OPEN P.O. FOR FILM, SLI ACCOUHT NIJHBER 100-166-;-5218 lf0-180-;-5220 300- lW-~-5207 3~0-1~-;-5262 001-19f-60?0 001 - 100-~-5265 001 - 100-999-5258 190-181-999-5212 001-1280 001-166-~-56;Z) 190-183-;-5380 001-171-;-5217 001-150-;-5259 001-100-;-5258 001-2120 100-2120 1~0-2120 001-1~0-;-5228 001-170-;-5262 W0-180-;-5263 1~0-180-~;-5258 1~0-180-;-5258 001-110-;-5208 1~0-180-;-5208 001-2160 100-21~ 190-2160 320-1~-~-5258 001-160-;-5258 001-1~0-;-5258 001-170-;-5327 001-171-;-5250 1~0-180-;-5301 ITB AMOUNT 9.~ 6.31 33.62 5.39 .12 18.36 13.00 180.~ 10,360.00 160.00 613.00 125.10 3~.~ ~.10 1.53 16.87 169.00 ~.16 6.50 62.17 112.~ 175,00 '175.00 5.B CHECK NeOUNT 186.71 180.00 10,360.00 160.00 613.00 125.10 380.00 102.50 192.79 113.01 63.50 12T.00 339.26 350.00 6,00 33.65 VOUCH~ PAGE 02/24 16:16 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUNBER DATE ~ER MANE 13859 02/26/96 000580 PHOTO gORKS 13860 02/26/96 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC - REFRIG 13861 02/26/96 000663 ZAPMO 13862 02/26/96 000702 13863 02126196 000815 1386~ 02/26/9~ 0008~7 13864 02/26/96 000837 13865 02/26/96 0008~5 13866 02/26/96 000905 13867 02/26/96 000907 13867 02/26/96 000907 13~/....02/26/96 000974 1:38L J2/26/96 000981 138459 02/24/96 000981 13870 02/Z~/96 00104,7 13870 02/26/96 001067 13870 02/26/96 0010/,7 13870 02/26/96 0010~7 13870 02/2~/~ 001~7 13870 02/2~/~ 001~7 13870 02/2~/g~ 001~7 1~70 02/2~/~ 001~7 13870 0~2~/~ 001~7 138~ 02/2~/g~ 001~7 138~ 02/2~/~ 001~7 138~ 02/26/9~ ~1~7 13870 02/26/~ ~1~7 138~ 02/26/~ 001~7 13871 02/26/~ 001056 13872 02/24/96 001065 13872 02/26/;~. 001065 13872 02/26/W, 001065 13872 02/26/W, 001065 13872 02/26/94 001065 13873 02/26/96 001072 13~ J2/26/96 001120 CADDY GRAPHICS RCNLEY, CATHERINE CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TA CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TA NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITI TEMECULA SHUTTLE SERVZC RANCHO CAR klASH RANCHO CAR MASH RUIZ, CRAIG R,H,F, [iC R,H.F, BOAT TECH HARINE & SKI BOAT TECH MARINE & SKI BOAT TECH MARINE & SKI BOAT TECH MARINE & SKI BOAT TECH ItSRIME & SKI BOAT TECH liARIll & SKI BOAT TECH MARIll & SKI BOAT TECH MARINE & SKI BOAT TECH HAR[NE & SKI BOAT TECH MARINE & SKI BOAT TECHItAItlNE & SKi BOAT TECHMAR[HE & SKi BOAT TECH lIARIRE & SIC] BOAT TECH MARINE & SKi CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFF CiTY OF TEllCULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NU4BER DEVELOPE &IXJNT 001-161-999-5250 INSTALL CaeERCIAL ELEC 100-164-999-5260 199~ CLASS A2 lllIERSHI 001-162-999-5226 TYPESETTING & GRAPHICS 1~0-183-~-5370 CLASS ]NSTRUCTOR/80X 190-183-999-5.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'~0 000837 GARNISHMENT 001-2140 O00837GARNISHNENT 100-2160 CONFEHENCE/NARCH 12-15 001-100-999-5258 TRANSPORT FROR SAN DIEG 001-100-999-5258 CAR gASH 310-16~-999-5216 CAR MASH 310-180-999-5216 TUITIOR REIND. 001-150-999-5259 REPAIR AND SECERTIFICAT 001-170-999-5215 REPAIR AND RECERT[FICAT 001-170-999-5215 REAR TIRE FROlIT T l RE OIL FILTER lOTOR OIL BRES; PLUGS CLUTCH PLATES SHIFT SHAFT SEAL CLUTCH RELEASE BERRINGS VALVE COVER GASKET CAM PLUGS CLUTCH COVER OA$1G~T FREIGHT TAX 001-170-~-5216 001-170-99~-5216 001-170-999-5216 001-170-~-5216 001-170-9~9-5216 001-170-~-5216 001-170-999-5216 001-170-W9-5216 001-170-~-5216 001-170-999-5216 001-170-~-5216 001-170-999-5214 001-170-f~-5216 001-170-999-5216 RENB4 CLASS [ MENBERSHI 001-162-~-527.6 USCNIPEBSCO (DEF. COlto. 001065 DEF CClIP 001-Z080 USOI/PEBSCO (DEF. CORP. 001065 DEF CONP 100-2080 USCH/PEBSCO (DEF. CORP. 001065 DEF CONP 190-2080 USCH/PEBSCO (DEF. COHP. 001065 DEF CONP 300-2080 USON/PEBSCO (DEF. CORP. 001065 DEF COHP 320-2080 BANK OF AMERICA NT & SA ESOY, VITO P. JR.. REII49URSE NDA BOND/CDBG 280-1060 ENGINEERING SERVIP;S 100-16~-999-5248 ITEM AMOUNT 8.57 712.33 100.00 100.00 128.00 585.00 50.00 41.62 16.00 400.00 180.16 136.75 155.20 108,66 5.95 11.80 8.00 67.50 3.00 2.55 21.60 13.00 5.6O 272.50 7.50 31.20 150.00 3,035.~ 197.98 156.32 3.~6 312.50 216,352.00 650.00 CHECK AI~3UMT 57.39 712.33 100.00 100,00 128,00 187.92 585.00 50.00 57,62 600.00 316.91 716.06 150.00 3,705.~2 216,352.00 650.00 VOUCHREZ 02/24/94 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 13876 13876 13876 13876 13876 13876 13876 13877' 13878 13879 13880 13881 13882 13883 CHECK DATE 02/24/~ 02/24/94 02/24/94 02/24/94 02/24/94 02/24/94 02/24/94 02/24/94 02/24/94 02/24/94 02/24194 02/24/94 02/24/94 02/24/94 02/24/94 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAJ~ ENTERTAINNENT PtlLICATI 001193 CCl4P USA, INC. 001193 COI4P USA, INC. 001193 CCI4P USA, INC, 001193 COtqP USA, [NC. 001193 CONP USA, INC, 001193 COHP USA, INC, 001193 COHP USA, INC. 001243 PALMGUIST, NARY 001305 PUBLIC RETIREMENT JOURN 001317 DAVIS, HARY 001318 140LFF, MIKE 001319 ROGERS, IRENE 001320 CRCNE-PELLETIER, JULIE 001321 CITI TECH CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEN DESCRIPTION REINB. TEEN FIJ~DRAISER 179862 VINDO~S 3.1 211072 UORDPERFECT 6.0 168071 QUATTRO PRO 5 UI 216A20 PARADOX 4.5 gIN ACCOUNT MUNBER 190-183-999-5320 001-171-999-5221 001-171-999-5221 001 - 171-999-5221 001 - 171-999-5221 207474 lIARVAlID GRAPHICS 001-171-999-5221 FREIGHT TAX CLASS INSTRUCTOR/80X RETIRENENT TRAINING/OL INSTRUCTOR FEE/80~ BOOT REI!4BURSENENT CPR$ CORFERENCEI2/4-2/5 CPRS CONFERENCE/2/4-2/5 NAINTENANCE REPORT 001-171-999-5221 001-171-999-5221 190-183-999-55"$0 001 - 150-999-5261 190-183-999-5330 100-164-999-5243 190-180-999-5258 190-180-999-5258 001-163-999-5224 TOTAL CHECKS ITB! 222.~0 87.77 2?9.12 38.80 135.39 2~,5.78 7.50 60.98 204.40 135.00 43.20 89.38 71.93 28.50 CHECK AIIOLJNT 222,40 855,34 204,40 135,00 43,20 89,38 88.~ ..Z,1~93 ,/50 293,409.56 VOUC./~ PAGE 3 02/, 15:08 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERICI)S FUND TZTLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 COIIUIZTY HERVICES DISTRICT 210 CAPZTAL iMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOP~ENT AGENCY - C]P 320 ZNFORNATZOR SYSTEMS TOTAL AllGUIlT 320,329.42 3,832.00 3,27Q.QO 14,677.53 5,900.00 2,116.38 350,125.33 VOUCHRE2 ~ 1 02/26/96 15:08 CiTY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER]ODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NUNBER VENDOR NANE ITEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER iTEM A!e3UNT CHECK A/e3UNT 13887 13887 13887 13888 13889 13889 13889 13889 13889 13889 13889 13889 13890 13890 13891 13892 13892 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/9~ 03/08/9~ 03/08/94 -03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/9~ 03/08/94 000161 000161 000161 00016~ 000178 000178 000178 000178 000178 000178 000178 000178 000202 000202 000251 000252 000252 EDEN SYSTENS, INC. EDEN SYSTENS, INC. EDEN SYSTEHS, INC. ESGIL CORPORATION GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATE J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATE PLANNING CENTER, INC. T POLYCRAFT, INC. POLYCRAFT, INC. UPI)ATI~) DOCUMENTATION DATA CONVERSION ACUCOBOL RUNTIME; 2-8 U 320-1f9-999-5211 320-199-~9-5211 320-1~9-f9~-5211 JAN PLAN CHECKS 001-162-~99-5248 686DX-66 HORKSTATION ItSDOS 6.2 4M8 SINH HEMORY CHIP SE 210Nil IDE HARD DRIVE TAX TAX TAX TAX 001-171-~99-5606 001-171-~99-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-1~9-999-5215 001-171-~99-5&0~ 001-171-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-1~9-~99-5215 DESIGN SERVICES FOR RAN 210-190-137-5802 CREDIT EXTRAS 210-190-137-5802 GENERAL PLAN CONTRACT A 001-161-~99-5268 2 7/8" TEHECULA CITY SE 001-171-999-5296 TAX 001-171-999-5296 330.00 630.00 289.00 3,257.85 1,856.00 74.00 600.00 205.00 143.84 5.74 46.50 15.88 7,525.00 225.00- 7,119.61 1,075.00 83.31 1,249.00 3,257.85 2,946.96 7,300.00 7,119.61 1 'I1 13893 13894 13894 13894 13894 13894 13894 13894 13894 13894 13894 13894 13895 13896 13897 13897 13898 13898 13899 13899 03/08/94 03/08/94 03108/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 000276 000406 000406 000606 000~06 000406 000406 000406 000406 000/,06 000/,06 000/,06 0004.81 000606 0008~3 0008~3 00088 000883 000955 000955 PURKISS ROSE RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHER]F RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RiVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERZF RIVERS]DE COUNTY SHERIF RiVERSiDE COUNTY SHER[F RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHER[F RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHER[F GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONN RIVERSIDE COUNTY ADMIN. MCDAN[EL ENGINEERING CO MCDANIEL ENGINEERING CO NONTELEONE EXCAVATING MONTELEONE EXCAVATING RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF 20 YEAR MASTER PLAN LAW ENFORCEMENT LAW ENFORCEMENT LAW ENFORCEMENT LAW ENFORCENENT LAW ENFORCEMENT LAW ENFORCEHENT LAW ENFORCEMENT LAW ENFORCEMENT LAW ENFORCERENT LAW ENFORCEMENT EXTRA DUTY tDECEMBE fDECEMBE tDECEMBE q)ECEMBE rDECEMBE ~ECENBE ~ECEMBE q)ECEMBE tDECEMBE ~ECEMBE PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL S THIRD & FOURTH GTR ACll PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0 CREDIT OCT SERV]CES VIA LORO LANDSCAPING SLOPE FAILURE ON RANCHO DEC. PATROL BIKE PATROL/JAN 190-180-999-5250 001-170-999-5288 001-170-999-5299 001-170-999-5298 001-170-999-5296 001-170-999-52~0 001-170-~99-5262 001-1230 001-170-~99-5291 001-170-~-5281 001-170-~99-5282 001-170-~9-5288 280-1700 001-170-999-5325 210-16&-627-5802 21 O- 166-627- 5802 100-164-999-5402 100-164-999-5602 001-170-999-5326 001-170-999-5326 3,270.00 193,747.81 16,172.18 18,8/,6.32 6,960.03 5,256.56 14,896.32 3,384.45 3,38~.65 14,194,96 2,292.48 605.37 2,400.00 19,028.00 5,522.00 2,628.50' 985.00 975.00 6,018.09 712.20 3,270.00 27~,718.93 2,600.00 19,028.00 2,89~.50 1,960.00' 13900 03/08/94 001007 NPG CORP. MORK ORDER 93-W,-88 - 2 100-16~-999-5402 936.00 VOUCHP, f"" 021241 ,5:08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK MtJNBER DATE 13900 03/08/W, 13901 03/08/9~ 1390Z 03/08/94 13902 03/08/94 13903 03/08/94 VENDOR NUHBER 001007 0010/6 0012/,6 001246 001288 VENDOR NAHE NPG CORP. REXOR, FREEDNAN, KLEPET UR$ CONSULTANTS, INC. URS CONSULTANTS, INC. SAN DIEGO BUSINESS JOtJR CITY OF TEHECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERICI)S ITEH DESCRIPTION I, IORK ORDER gJ-94-88 POT PROF SERVICES FOR JAN 9 CONSULTANT CONSULTANT SPONSORSHII- A~ tN ee} mJ TOTAL CHECKS ACCOUNT NUI4BER 100-164.-999-5402 001-130-~-5247 210-165-631-5802 210-165-631-580Z ITEN ANOUNT 936.00 1,236.85 996.45 3,487.58 PAGE 2 CHECK AHOUNT 1,872.00 1,2~6.85 4,484.03 ~t,t;O0,O0 350,125.33 VOUCNRE2 ~ 3 02/24/94 15:08 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER[COS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 CGleeJNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOiqqENT AGENCY - CIP 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS TOTAL AMOUNT 320,329,~2 3,832.00 3,270.00 1~,677.53 5,~00.00 2,116.38 350,125.33 VOUCHER/ ,CHECK NLINBER 13887 13887 13887 13888 13889 13889 13889 13889 13889 13889 13889 13889 13890 13890 13891 13892 13./"- 13893 13894 13894 13894 13894 13894 13894 13894 13894 13894 13894 13894 13895 13896 13897 13897 13898 13898 13899 13899 1 15:08 CHECK DATE 03/08/W, 03/08/W, 03/08/W, 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94. 03/08/94 03/08/9~ 03/08/94 03/08/94 0~/08/9~ 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/9/, 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/9~ 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 03/08/94 VENDOR HLI4BER 000161 000161 000161 O001be, 000178 000178 000178 000178 000178 000178 000178 000178 000202 000202 000251 000252 000252 000276 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 0004O6 000406 000406 000481 000606 00084,3 000843 000883 000883 000955 000955 001007 VENDOR NAME EDEN SYSTEMS, INC. EDEN SYSTEMS, INC. EDEN SYSTEMS, INC. ESGIL CORPORATION GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING GO J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATE J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATE PLANNING CENTER, INC. T POLYCRAFT, INC. POLYCRAFT, INC. PURKISS ROSE RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY $HERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHER[F RIVERSlOE COUNTY SHERIF GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM RIVERSIDE COUNTY ADNIN. MCDANXEL ENGINEERING CO MCOANIEL ENGINEERING CO NONTELEONE EXCAVATING NONTELEONE EXCAVATING RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF NPG CORP. CITY OF TEMEOULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERZOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION UPDATED DOCUMENTATION DATA CONVERSION ACUCOBOL RUNTIf,E; 2-8 U JAN PLAN CHECKS 4861)X-66 gORKSTAT%ON MS)OR 6.2 /de SINN MEMORY CHIP SE 2lOMB IDE HARD DRIVE TAX TAX TAX TAX DESIGN SERVICES FOR RAN CREDIT EXTRAS GENERAL PLAN CONTRACT A 2 7/8" TEMEOULA CITY SE TAX 20 YEAR MASTER PLAN LAg ENFORCENENT/I)ECEMBE LAW ENFORCENENT/1)ECE!IE LAW ENFONCEENT/DECEMBE LAR ENFORCEMENT/1)ECLqeiE LAW ENFONCENENT/!)ECEN8E LAW ENFORCEMENT/DECEMBE LAW ENFONCENENT/!)ECEMBE LAg ENFONCENENT/I)ECENBE LAW ENFORCENENT/DECEMBE LAw ENFORCEMENT/1)ECEHBE EXTRA DUTY PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL S THIRD & FOURTH QTR ACI[ PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0 CELOIT OCT SERVICES VIA LOBO LANDSCAPING SLOPE FAILURE ON RANCHO DEC. PATROL BIKE PATROL/JAN WORK ORDER 9c~-9~-88 - 2 ACCOUNT NUMBER 320-199-999-5211 320-1f9-99~-5211 320-199-999-5211 001-162-9~-5248 001-171-9~9-5604 001-171-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5215 001-171-999-5604 001-171-~9~-5221 320-199-F~9-5221 320-199-999-5215 210-190-137-5802 210-190-137-5802 001-161-999-5248 001-171-999-52~& 001-171-999-5296 190-180-999-5250 001-170-~-5288 001 - 170-999-529~ 001 - 178-99~-5298 001-170-f99-5294 001-170-999-5290 O01 - 170 -999- 5262 001-1230 001 - 170-9~-5291 001 - 170-999- 5281 001-170-999-5282 001-170-999-5288 280-1700 001-170-999-5325 210-1~:~-627-5802 210-166-627-5802 100-1t4-999-5402 100-164-99~-5402 001-170-999-5326 001-170-999-5326 100-16r,99~-5402 ITEM AMOUNT 330.00 630.0O 289.00 3,257.85 1,856.00 74.00 600.00 205.00 143.84 5.74 46.50 15.88 7,525.00 225,00' 7,119.61 1,075.00 83.31 3,270.00 193,747.81 16,172.18 18,8~6.32 6,940.03 5,254.56 14,896.32 3,38~.~5 3,38~.45 14,194.96 2,292.~8 605.37 2,400.00 19,028.00 5,522.00 2,628.50- 985.00 975.00 6,018.09 712.20 9~6. O0 PAGE 1 CHE~ ANOUNT 1,249.00 3,257.85 7,300.00 7,119.61 1,158.31 3,270.00 27~,718.F3 2,400.00 19,028.00 2,8913.50 1,960.00 VOUC!IRE2 02/2&/g& 15:08 CITY OF TEHECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK HUNRER 13900 13901 13902 13902 13903 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NU!,!BER NAIIE 03/08/94 001007 NPG CORP. 03/08/94 0010~6 REXON, FREEDNAN, KLEPET 03/08/94 0012~ URS CONSULTANTS, INC, 03/08/94 001246 URS CONSULTANTS, INC. 03/08/94 001288 -SAN DIEGO BUSINESS JOUR ITEN DESCRIPTION M3RK ORDER 9'~-9~.-88 POT PROF SERVICES FOR JAN 9 CONSULTANT CONSULTANT SPONSORSHIP AD IN GO BU ACCOUNT NUNBER 100-1~-999-5~02 001-130-999-5247 210-165-631-5802 210-165-631-5802 280-199-999-525~ ITEH ANOUNT 936.00 1,;?_36.85 996.~5 3,487.58 3;500.00 CHECK ANOUMT 1,87'Z.00 1,236.85 4,484.03 3,500.00 TOTAL CHECKS 350,125.:33 ITEM NO. 4 FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer March 8, 1994 City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 1994 RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's report as of January 31, 1994. DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio and receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the Code Sections as of January 31, 1994. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 1994 2. Schedule of Fund Balances as of January 31, 1994 City of Tamecula City Treasurer'8 Report As of January 31, 1994 Cash Activity for the Month of January: Cash and Investments as of January 1, 1994 Cash Receipts Cash Disbursements Cash and Investments as of January 31, 1994 $ 39,959,771 16,258,497 (14,459,789) $ 41,758,479 Cash and Investments Portfolio: Type of Investment Petty Cash General Checking Benefit Demand Deposits Local Agency Investment Fund Deferred Compensation Fund Deferred Compensation Fund Defined Contribution Fund Trust Accounts-TCSD COPs Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds Institution City Hall First Interstate First linerstate State Treasurer ICMA PEBSCO PEBSCO Bank of America Bank of America Yield 4.359% 2.743% 2.743% Balance 800 373,417 7,075 26,776,387 258,997 204,947 16,870 1,091,106 13,028,980 41,758,479 (1) (1) (1)-This amount is net of outstanding checks. Per Government Code Requirements, this Treasurer's Report is in compliance with the City of Ternecula's investment policy and there are adequate funds available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next thirty days. Prepared by Tim McDermott, Senior Accoumam City of Temecula Schedule of Fund Balances As of January 31, 1994 Total Assets $ Less: Liabilities Total Fund Balances Less: Reserved Amounts (1) Less: Designated Amounts (2) Unreserved, Undesignated Fund Balances $ COITtlTIUrljty Services Redevelopment City District Agency 24,074,477 $ 3,671,078 $ 20,441,969 2,969,6d8 740,797 533,152 21,1 04,829 2,930,281 19,908,81 7 5,333,311 1,062,980 5,792,862 8,889,713 1,867,301 14,115,955 6,881,805. $ $ $ Total 48, 187,524 4,243,597 43,943,927 12,189,153 24,872,969 6,881,805 (1) Includes amounts reserved for encumbrances, land held for resale, long-term notes receivable, Iow/mod housing, and debt service. (2) Includes amounts designated for economic uncertainty, debt service, and continuing appropriations. ITEM 5 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY . FINANCE OFFICER'~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPC~Y Meyor end City Count;I/City Maneger Scott F. Fie~d, ~;ity Attorney M--rch 1, 1994 Ynez Corridor Sales Tax Agreement and Joint Financing Agreement for Solana Way Widening RECOMMENDATION: Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the following, in substantially the form presented, subject to approval by the City Manager and City Attorney as to the final form of the agreements: "First Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Temecula and Eli Lilly and Company, an Indiana Corporation regarding Sales Tax Revenues of Community Facilities District No. 88-12." 2. "First Amendment to Agreement between the City of Temecula and Rancho Mobile Home Estates regarding Sales Tax Revenues of Community Facilities District No. 88-12 (Ynez Corridor)" and 3. "First Amendment to Joint Financing Agreement Between Community Facilities District No. 88-12 of the County of Riverside and the City of Temecula" ,,~ DISCUSSION: 1. In order to induce the formation of the Ynez Corridor Community Facilities District, the City Council approved the use of sales tax revenues generated within the District to reimburse owners for Special Taxes levied to meet bond payments. However, the Council directed that the sales tax reimbursement would only be used for improvements of a community-wide nature. For example, no sales tax reimbursement was made available for constructing four of six of the lanes on Ynez Road, since these would have been a developer obligation. The effect of this arrangement means that the District will acquire the facilities costing approximately $164,527. The property owner will then repay this debt through special tax payments, consisting of principal and interest on this portion of the Bonds. 2: At the time the District sold Series 1992 Bonds, the only work contemplated to be R:~genda.rlet~OEB.4ke 1 performed with the Bond proceeds was widening Ynez Road, designing Overland Bridge and 'the Winchester end Jefferson interchange acquiring the Coop property for the Overland Bridge and $2,000,000 for park acquisition and improvement. However, when the County and oroperty owner originally epproved the District, a broad list of public improvement was ~.. ~'-;zed. One of these improvements was widening Solana Way from Motor Car Parkway to Margaret3 .".oad. Funds are available ire;,- :"'- Bond proceeds to widen Solana Way. The Council has previously authorized solicitations of D:~. for the widening, and staff will recommend a contractor to construct the project at the Marc;-, c. ' ;.~4meeting. However, in order to use Bond proceeds. two existing agreements must be amen~=~. First, the Sales Tax Agreement for the property owh~ ' Rbutting the Solana Way widening must be amended to permit widening Solana Way without sa~.' ~ax reimbursement. The attached agreement with Eli Lilly and Rancho Mobile Home Estates prG, !~e that Solana will be widened with Bond proceeds, the property owner will not be reimbursed for the widenin~ v..,;~ Sale~ Tax Revenues. 3. Second, the Joint Financing Agreement between the City and County establishes the work that may be performed with Bond proceeds. The approved work is set forth in Exhibit B to the Agreement. Consequently, the Amended Financing Agreement add a new Exhibit B, which includes the Solana Way widening' for the list of approved expenditures. ATTACHMENTS: Amendment to Joint Financing Agreement between City and County re: CFD88-12 JSG R:%agende.mt~OES-Ree 2 FIRST MIXNI]2~TOTEaJOINTFINANCINC AGItFaeINT BETWI3N COMISJNX~ FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-13 OF THR COUNTY'OF RIVERSIDE AND TH] CITY OF TEMICT]IA THIN FZIiSTAMENDMENTTOT]~JOINTFZNANCING AgReEMENT (the "Amendment") is lade an4enterel into as of February__, 1994, by and between CO!~ITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-12 OF TEl COU!rZY OF itlVEUIDE (YNEZ CORRIDOR), a lqally constituted governmental entity organlead and exietin~ pursuant to Division 2, Part 1, Chapter l.S Of Title S of the California Government Code (heroinafter 'CFD No. 88-12u) and the CITY OF TEMBCULA, an incorporated municipality (heroinafter wClTYu). A. On or about August 1989, the Count~ Of Riverside issued the "Public Report on the Proposed Community Facilities DiStrict No. 88-12 of the County Of Riverside (Yne2 Corridor)". Exhibit C to the Public Report sets forth the facilities that may be constructed with the bonded indebtedness of the District. Included within Exhibit C is the extension of Solaria Way from Ynel Road to Margarita Road as shown on Exhibit A~ attached hereto. B. On April 3, 1990 the Board of Supervisors canvassed the election results of the special alectiol~held o~ March 23, 1990, and determined that the qualified electors within CFD No. 88-12 voted by a majorit in excess of two-thirds of the votes approve CFD 88-12 Incurring bonded indeb~edness in cast to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed 280,000,000 and the lev~ of the Special Tax to pa~ debt service on any bonded indebtedness incurred, to pay the administrative expenses of CFD 88-12 =o the extent allowed by the maximum rate cf the Special Tax. C. In anticipation of issuing and selling an initial series of bonds (the neerite 1992 Dondew) to pay for the acquisition of certain Road Facilities, and to pay for the design, engineering and oonstruo~on of certain Road Faclli~ies, CFD 82-12 end the City entered into a Jol~t Financing Agreement pursuant to Government Code Sections 53316.2, 53316.4 and 53316.6, dated as of April 1, 1992. D. CFD NO. 88-12 islued the Series 199~ O~nds to pay for acquisition of certain road facilities, as identified on ~xhiblt S to the Joint Ftnancln~Agreement and to pay for the design, engineering and construction of certain road facllit~es as identified on Exilebit S to the Joint Financing Agreement. I. The ~oint Financing Igreement established the improvements that ~e~e to be c~nstructed with the proceeds o~ the Series 1992 ~nds. The Solana Way extension was not included as one of the improv~ments to be construeted pursuant to the 3oint F inane ing. &grewsent. F. Pursuant to the Saint Finanatng Agr.sment, the City has contracted for the · isition# design and construction of the road ~acilities descr~b~ in Exhibit B to the ~oint Financing Aereemen~. Sufficient savt s have been realized in the construction of the road ~ac~lities to persit construction o~ the Solana Way extension. Now, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covenants heroinafter contained, the par~las agree that the Joint Financing Agreement shall be amended as fallOWes 1. The Road Facilities as idm~tified i~ Exhibit B to the Joint Financing lgTeesent are hereby amended by replacing Exhibit I to the ~oint Financin~ Xgresmen~ with Xxhibit B ~o this lmendment. 2. All other terms and conditions o~ the Joint Financin~A~reement dated as of April 1, ~992, will rmi~ the same. IN WXTNES2 WHEREOF, the parties have caused this ~greement to be executed as o~ the date firsU above written. CONI(UNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 82-12 OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Bye. Chairman of the Board oZ Supervisors, Ix Ofticio the Legislative Body of Conunity Facilities District No. 88-12 of the County of Riverside ATTEST By~ Clerk'of the Board oZ Supervisors, ZxOfficiothe Legislative Body of Community Facilities Dim~rictNo. el-X2 of the County of ltivsrsids CITY OF TEMECULA Date: Byt Ron Roberrs, Nayor ATTEST: By: aune S. Gree3c, City Clerk Approved as to form: By: Scott F. Field, City Attorney 3 FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEKECULA AND ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, AN INDIANA CORPORATION, RSGARDING SALES TAX REVENUES OF COMMUNITY FACILITIR8 DISTRICT NO. 88-12 (YNEZ CORRIDOR) THIS AGIt~EM~NT is made and entered into this day of February, 1994# by and ~mong ELI LIT.~;y AND COMPANY an Indiana Corporation, hereinafter referred to collectively as sLillyu and the CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation hereinafter referred to as the "C~ty." WHEREAS, prior to incorporation of the City, the County of Riverside (the "County,, ) initiated and conducted proceedings pursuant to th~ Mello-ROos Community Facilities Act of 1982, am amended, Chapter 2.5 (commencing with S 53311) Of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code (the eHello-Roos Actw), for the establishment of Community Facilities DistriCt No. 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) of the County of Riverside, State of California (the "DistriCt" ) ~ and WHEREAS, all proceedings. pursuant to the Mellc-Roos Act with respect to the establishment of the District, the authorization of the bonded ~ndeb~edness therefor and of the levy of special taxes cn taxable property therein to pay the principal of and laterest on the bonds thereof were completed as of March 23, 1990y and WHEREAS, on or abou~ june 14, 1991, the City entered into an Agreement entitled ~Agreement Regarding sales Tax Revenues As To Businesses Located Within The Boundaries Of Community FaCilities District No, 88-12 (Ins-- Corridor) or Lhe County or Riverside, State of CalifoFnia" (hereinafter, '*Sales Tax Xgr ment*') with the ee Property Owners within the District whereby the City will use a portion of the sales end use tax revenues received by the City from sales taX generating businesses located within the District to reimburse the Property Owners for the specie. 1 taxes; and WF~RFJtS, among the public improvements which are proposed to be financed with the proceeds of the bonds of the District is the widening of Solerie Way from Motor Car Parkway to Margarlta Road, as shown on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and which will hereinafter referred to as the eImprovement.; WHEREAS, ~he Improvement ks not of s oommunity-wide benefit and, consequently, it is the intent of the City not to use sales and use tax revenues to reimburse Lilly for payment of special taxes associated with the Improvement; and . WHEREAS, City and Lilly have agreed to amend the Sales Tax Agreement as It applies to Lilly to provide that City will not reimburse Lilly with sales tax for the Improvement. NOW, THERBFORE, ~n consideration of the promises and the mutual covenants and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties do hereb~ covenant and agree as followst Section 1. I~RCTTAT.-. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct. 10';01235 Section 2. ~11~.FTNTTTONgo Wl~en used in ~his Xeendment, ~e (a) "Lilly" means ~a~ parcel o~ land located ~i~in ~~ies o~ ~e Dls~tc~ ~ as ~sessors Parcel Map Xo. 921- 090-008 aM as des~i~d in ~lbi~ ~. (b) "~provem~w me~s widening Solana way Zro~ MOtOr C~ P~ay ~o ~arita Road, as more specifically des~ibed in ~ibit A, attached h~eto. (c) "8pecial Tax" or "S~cial Taxes,, means ~e Special Tax or Tax~ to ~ levied by ~he Board oZ Supe~isors ~ ~e County d~ing ea~ Ziscal y~ to pay ~e princi~l and int~est ponio~ or ~e ~nds of ~e Di$~i~ which w~e issued and sold finance ~e cost oZ design, administration and ~e cons~uction ~he ImprovEant. h~y ~ended, to provide that ~e amour o~ sales tax rei~urs~ent to Llll~ is r~uc~ by ~e proport~onate sha~e Special Tax attrl~tabla to ~e ~nds oZ the District sold dasi~, a~inist~. ~d cons~ct ~e Improvement describ~ ~ibit A. The est~ted cost of the Improvement is $115,000, however, the actual cost of ~e Improvement will be established by ~e City ~gine~, in his reasonable discretion. Section 4. ~tT. ~ T~S ~ Rw~rN T~ S~qE. Except as amended herein, all other te~s of ~e Sales Tax Xgre~ent shall r~ain ~e 2~e. 3 Section 5. ~UTIIO~TTY. Each part[ hereto represents and warrants to the other parties that it has the power and authority to enter into this Amendment, and that each person executing this Amendment on Ate behalf has been duly authorlead so to act for and on behalf of such party. Section 6. ~.NTTRv. ~M~NDM~NT. It As expressly agreed that this Amendment embodies the ant Are agreement of the parties in relationship to the subject matter hereof, and that no other agreement or understanding, verbal or otherwise, relative to the subject matter hereof exists between the parties at the time of · execution, and ~ha~ this Amendment may be modified or amended only k./ a writing signed by the duly aut/loriled and empowered representatives of each and all of the parties hereto. Section 7. COUNTerPARTs. This Amendment may be executed An counterparts sl~ned on behalf of the Cit7 and one or more of Lilly. Each such counterpart shall be an original Amendment, but all such counterparts shall together constitute a single agreement. IN WITNBBB WIiEREOF# t. Jle par~ies heretic have executed this Amendmen~ the day and year-~irst above vritten. ~OH ROBERT2, NAYOR Alsi, XOVED X2 TO FORKs SCOTT F, FIELDr CITY ATTORNEI BT, I LII~Y MiD COM~Ma By:. Print:ed Name: FZRST AMENDMEanT '~ AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEM~CUla AND RANCliO MOBILE HOMES ESTATES, REGARDING 2~V.V.S TAX REVENUES OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-12 (YNEZ CORRIDOR) THIS A,GRE~e~NT is made and entered into ~his day of Februar~, 19 9 4, by and among Rancho Mobile Homes Estates hereinafter referred to collectively as 'Rancho Mobile Homes" and the CITY OF TEHE~, a municipal corporation hereinafter referred to as the 'City." WHEREAS, prior to incorporation of the City, the county of Riverside (the "County") initiated and conducted proceedings pursuant ~o the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amenfled, Chapter 2.5 (commencing with S 53311) of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government code (the "Mello-Roos Ac~c"), for the establishment. of Community Facilities District No. 85-12 (Ynez Corridor) of the County of Riverside, State of Call[ornia (the eDiStriOt") ] and WHEREAS, all proceedings pursuant to the Nello-Rooe Act with respect t0 the establishment of the District, the authorization of the bonded indebtedness therefor and of t/le lev~ of speolal taxes on taxable property therein to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds thereof were completed ae of March 23, 1990; arxd WHEREAS, on or about June 14, 1991, the City entered into an 1 .r~- i-94 ~C~ 10~43 Agreement entitled "Agreement Regarding S&les Tax Revenues As ro Businesses I~cated Within ~he Boundaries O2 Community Facilities Distri~ No. 88-~2 (Yna$ Co~idor) or ~e County o~ ~v~side~ State of C~liZorni$" [h~einaft~, 'Sml~ f~ A~e~wn~n] wi~ ~e potion o~ ~e sales ~d use tax revenues received ~ t~e City f~ sales tax 9~erating businesses lo~ed ~i~in ~e Distric~ ~o rei~se'~o ~operty ~ers for ~e speulal taxes; and ~, ~ng the p~lic impro~uts ~ich are proposed ~o be finan~ wi~ ~e proceeds of ~e ~s of the Distri~ is ~e widening of 8olana Way from Motor Car P~ay to ~rgari~ R~d, as eho~ on ~hibit A, ~ta~ed hereto, ud which will h~einaf~er referr~ to as ~e "Improvuen~e; ~~, ~e I~rov~ent i8 not of a c~uni~y-wide ~efit and, cone~u~ly, i~ is ~he ~e~ of ~e Ci~7 n~ ~o use sales and use ~ revuues ~o re~b~se Ran~o ~blle H~es for paint of speolal t~u associated wi~ ~e ~ov~ent; and ~~S, Cl~7 and hn~o Mobile Homes ha~ age~ to ~d ~e Sal~ T~ ~eu~ as i~ appliu to Ra~o Mobile Ho~ to provide ~at City will not reimb~se ~~ Mobile Homes wi~ sales ~X for NOW, ~mRE, in consideration of ~e ~ises and the mutual cov~u~s and ~ndl~ione h~ei~ft~ S~ fo~h, ~e pa~ies do h~y coveant and ages as follows: Se~ion 1. R~CIT~L~. The Reci~ls set fo~ a~ve ~e ~e and co~ect. Section 2. ~F. FTNvTTONS. When used in ~his Amendment, ~he following terms shall hays ~s ~in~s s~ectrted be~Z (s) ~hn~o ~bil~ Homes~ means ~ ~cel o~ land ~ocatsd vl~in ~e ~und~i~s oZ ~e Dts~te~ ~o~ as assessors Parcel No. s21-290-003 a~ as described in ~ibi~ B. (b) ~I~vemen~v means vid~tng So~a~ Wa~ fr~ No~or Car Par~a~ to ~g~t~a ~ad, as more speciti~ly described (~) ~spec~a~ ~u'~ or eSpeois~ ~ese means ~e S~ia~ Tax or ~axes ~O ~ levlea ~ ~he Board o: Sup~isors oZ ~e County ea~ fis~ ~e~ ~o pay ~e pr~ol~ and ~nteres~ on ~he ~ion o~ ~e ~nds oZ ~e Dls~t~ ~ich vats issued and so~d ~o Ztnanee ~e cos~ o~ destgn~ a~lnis~ra~on and ~e cons~ion o~ ~o I~rov~en~. ~TV~n. ~e Sal~ Tax Agre~en~, as t~ a~ies ~o R~ho Homes, ts here~ ~dea~ ~ provide ~a~ ~e ~o~ oZ Bales ~X rei~ouen~' ~o hncho Mobile Homes is' redu~d by propo~i~a~ s~e of SpeciaX Tax s~tbu~Xe ~o ~e bonds of ~e Dlstri~ sold to dest~, a~inis~ and cons~ ~he Improv~en~ des~Fi~a In E~ibi~ A. ~e es~a~ed cos~ o~ ~he Improvemen~ 658~000, h~ever~ ~e ao~ual cos~ of Lhe Improvemen~ will es~ablished ~ ~he City Engineer, in his reasonable Se~ion 4, A~,T, ~H~ T~ ~ ~IN ~ ~K~. Excep~ ~d~ heroin~ a~l o~ ~ms o~ ~e Sales Tax A~eemen~ re~tn ~e Section 5. ~UTItORT~Y. ~aoh party hereto represents and warrants to the other parties that it has the power and authority to enter into this Amendment, and that each person executing this Imendment on its behalf has been duly authorized so tO set for and on behalf of such party. Section 6. ~,~T~. ~W~IDMk~I~. It is expressly agreed that ~his Amendment embodies the entire agreement of the parties in .relationship ~o the subject matter hereof, and that no other agreement or understanding, verbal or otherwise, relative to the subject matter hereof exists between the parties at the time of execution, and that this Amendment may be modified or amended only by a writing signed by the duly authorized and empowered representatives of each and &ll of the parties hereto. Section 7. COUNTFd.zPARTS. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts si%nad on behalf of the City and one or more of Rancho Mobile Homes. Each such counterpart shall be an original Amendment, but all such counterparts shall together constitute a single agreement. . 107012d4 4 r~ WITNESS WHEKEOF, the parties hereto have executed ~his Amendment the day and year first above written. Name Title_ CITY OFT~KWOULa RON ROBFaTS, MAYOR JUNE GREEK, CITY CL~K ~PRROVED aS TO Z'OZXs SCOTT F. FIELD, CITY ATTORNEY ITEM NO. 6 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY_~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works\City Engineer March 8, 1994 Award of Contract for Solana Way Street Improvements (Project No. PW93-12) PREPARED BY: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Award a contract for the Solena Way Street Improvements, Project PW93-12, to E.L. Yeager Construction Company for $149,570.O0and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract and subject approval by the County of Riverside and the adjacent property owrlers. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $14,957.00, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. BACKGROUND: On November 23, 1993, the City Council approved the construction plans and specifications, and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids. This project includes installation of curb & gutter, sidewalk, pavement and storm drain facilities on both sides of Solana Way from Motor Car Parkway to Margarita Road. The engineer's estimate for this project was $160,000. Eighteen bids for the project were publicly opened on January 20, 1994 and results are as follows: 1. E.L. Yeager Construction Company .............. $149,570.00. 2. Kruger McGrew Construction Company ........... $154,800.79. 3. E.A. Mendoza .............................. $158,381.70. 4. Matich Corporation .......................... $161,613.92. 5. Boral Resources, Inc .......................... $161,614.65. -1- pwO4%agdrpt~94%0308%pw93-12.ewd 022294 7. Delgado & Sons, inc ......................... ~170,018.73. 8. Eastland Construction ........................ $173,431.00. 9. Accurate Construction, Inc ..................... $188,948.65. 10. Edmondson Construction ..................... ~ 189,038.20. 11. E.G.N. Construction, Inc ...................... ~189,317.93. 12. IPS Services, Inc ............................ ~197,355.28. 13. Commercial Contractors ...................... $208,589.84. 14. Granite Construction Company ................. ~216,665.00. 15. Civil Works Corporation ...................... ~223,863.88. 16. West Coast Construction ..................... ~231,344.00. 17. Excel Paving Co ............................ $249,204.20. 18. Del Rio ................................... No Bid Bond E.L. Yeager Construction has not performed any work for the City, but has performed .well in other areas of Riverside County based on comments from references of previous work. The construction schedule is for 70 working days. Work is expected to begin in mid-March and be completed by the end of June. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: The project is being funded from the first series of bonds which have been sold for Community Facilities District 88-12. The Solana Way improvements are not part of the original CFD 88-12 improvements. A revised Sales Tax Reimbursement Agreement will be executed with the adjacent property owners on Solana Way. Funds are available for the construction contact and contingency amounts of $149,570.00 end $14,957.00 respectively. The total amount of $164,527.00is available in the CFD 88-12 account. -2- pwO4~gdrp694%O308%pw93-12.ewd 022294 CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. PW93- I2 SOLANA WAY STREET IMPROVEMENTS THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 8th day of March, 1994, by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and E. L. Yeager Construction Company, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: 1.8. CONTRACT DOCUMFNTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW93-12, $OLANA WAY tSIH,-~l IMPROVigIIEIITS, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of Califomia Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Soecifications for Public Works Construction. including all supplements as wr'rtten and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW93-12, SOLAliA WAY :,lewJ:l IMPROVEMBITS. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building News, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction .materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General, Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for Project No. PW93-12 SOLANA WAY STREET IMPROVEMENTS. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Document describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise C ONTR ACT CA- 1 p we t,3ip%p ro)N:te~p w93-12~ilpkg e specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, ant incidentals, end do all the work involved in executing the Contract. The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract . Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: PROJECT NO. PW93-12, SOLANA WAY I, Kr.k: ~ IMPROVEMENTS All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND RCHEDUI ;. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: One hundred and forty-nine II~:,,s--M and five htmi~ and seventy DOLLARS and no CENTS ($149.570.00). the total amount of the base bid. "* CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed seventy (70) working days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions .to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. PAYMENTS. On or about the thirtieth (30th) day of the month next following the commencement of the work, there shall be paid to the CONTRACTOR a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed since the commencement of the work. Thereafter, on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid such sum as will bring the payments each month up to ninety percent {90%) of the previous payments, provided that the CONTRACTOR submits his request for payment prior to the last day of each preceding month. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after CITY acceptance of the work and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year warranty with the CITY on a warranty form provided by the CITY. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments \on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. CONTRACT CA-2 pwO~oip%projeots%pw93-12~kipkg WARRANTY RFTFNTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance end correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule: CONTRACT AMOUNT ~25,000- $75,000 $75,000-~500,000 Over ~500,000 RFTI:NTION PFRIOD 180 days 180 days One Year RFFFNTION PERCENTAGE 3% ~2,250 + 2% of amount in excess of $75,000 e10,750 + 1% of amount in excess of e500,O00 e e 10. LInUIDATI=D DAMAGES: EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One Thousand Dollars (~1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of end without the fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. Unless a shorter time is specified elsewhere in this Contract, on or before making final request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, ell claims for compensation under or arising out of this Contract; the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of the final payment shall constitute a waiver of all claims against CITY under or arising out of this Contract except those previously made in writing and request for payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnify agreement with each claim for payment. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, end 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. CONTRACT CA-3 pwOS~ip%proje,~te~w93-12%bldpkg 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. TIME OF THF t=SSENCF. Time is of the essence in this contract. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR aloe. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, . employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken .or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other puerperal of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upor the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against tht~ Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. RESOLUTION OF CLAIMS. Any dispute or claim arising out of this Contract shall be arbitrated pursuant to Section 10240 of the California Public Contracts Code. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR end any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection end acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. CONTRACT CA-4 pwOb'%eip%projeote%pw93-12~dpkg 20. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 21. GOVERNING I AW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by the law of the State of California. 22. WRITTFN NOTICF. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: Tim D. Sedat, Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temacula, CA 92590-3606 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR By: Print or type NAME Print or type TITLE DATED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF TEMECULA By: Ronald H. Roberts, Mayor Scott F. Field, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk CONTRACT CA-5 pwO5'tdp%projeots%pw93-12%bidpkg ITEM NO. APPROV~T. CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER' CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer March 8, 1994 Solicitation for Construction of a Single Concrete Box Culvert on Ynez Road PREPARED BY: ~rf~ Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize solicitation for bids for construction of a single box culvert located on Ynez Road, 365 feet south of Vallejo Avenue on the east side of Ynez Road. BACKGROUND: The existing approved Equestrian Trail located 365 feet south of Vallejo Road on Ynez Road now dead-ends into Vallejo Channel which is located within the City's maintained right-of-way. The on-going maintenance of this channel created a break in the Equestrian Trail System where horses and riders cannot cross due to the depth of the channel. The approved trail now crosses Ynez Road. This construction project will provide year-round safe passage over this channel for horses and riders to use the trail on both sides of Ynez Road. The proposed concrete box culvert will allow the Vsllejo Channel to continue to function with minimal maintenance. The Engineer's estimate for this project is $16,000. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Public Works Department Drainage Facilities account # 100-164-999- 5401 for the proposed scope of work on Ynez Road. Attachments: Attachment "A" Equestrian Trail System Attachment "B" Location of Box Culvert to be installed r:~agdrpt%g4%0308~ulvert.bidlejpWP6.0 6000' ITEM NO. 8 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: · CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council City Clerk March 8, 1994 Records Destruction Approval RECOMMENDATION: Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. BACKGROUND: On March 22, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution No. 92-17 which authorizes the destruction of certain city records which have become outdated, obsolete or are excess documents, in compliance with Sections 34090 through 34090.7 of the Government Code. The records management program, administered by the City Clerk's Office, is in the process of microfilming all inactive records that ere over two (2) years old. The attached exhibit details plot plans for the years 1974 through 1988 which have been copied to microfilm. Three microfilm copies have been prepared, one to be kept in the Planning Department, one in the City Clerk's records vault and one in permanent off-site storage. The City Attorney has reviewed this request and has signed Exhibit "1" of the Annual Review as provided for in Resolution No. 92-17. ATTACHMENTS: JSG Destruction of Records Request List of Records recommended for destruction TO: City Clerk FROM: Gail Zigler, Office Specialist DATE: February 23, 1994 SUBJECT: Destruction of Records Request Attached is e print out of Plot Plans (Retention TyPe PP) dating from 1984 through 1990. These records have been microfilmed in triplicate with a copy distributed to the City Clerk's Records Vault, the Planning Department and · copy to the Vault in San Diego. The following have reviewed and approved this destruction request. Pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 34090, I hereby give my consent to the destruction of records under the direction of the City Clerk pursuant to the City of Temecula's adopted Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy. Department Heed: G'ar;Th"~'~hill, Planning Director Date City Attorney: ,.~_ r ( Scott F. Field Date R:~foeme~leetfuet.eqe R~ESTY...RR~I CIty of TemacuLa D~. Ref ......... 161 Page 1 ~/~/1~ Detruction Stst~ Listing Retention Type... ~ 12:37:~ D~tru~tlon Bats. ~/281199~ D~ Itm Rat. FiLe R~erence # Storege Nedla Ref. Date Ref. Brief Dentition Type Securt~ CLue Store Location Location Reference 161 ~/H/198~ 809~ PLot PLon 809~ ~ QOQ3 FiLm 3821NIA(X)Q1 Group t 161/l~/Tha VauLt 161 12/~/1986 ~99 PLot Hen ~99 ~ 0(05 FILm Group ! 161/l~/Tha vault 161 12/~/19~ 9600 PLot PLan 960Q ~ QOQ5 FiLm 3E1H1AOOOl Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 1z/~/1986 ~10 PLot PLan ~10 ~ OO(X FiLm 3821N1AOO01 Grc~ ] 161/12~The VauLt 161 12/22/1986 ~ 'PL~ PLan ~ ~ Q(XX FiLm 3821N1AO~1 Group ~ 161/1~he VauLt 161 12~0/19~ 9609 PLot PLan 9609 ~ QQ05 FiLm 3821,1A0001 Group i 161/120/Ths vault 161 01/05/1987 ~07 PLot PLon HO? ~ Q(X)~ FiLm 3821NIAOOO1 Group i 161/1~/T~ VauLt 161 01/~/1987 ~ PLot PLan K~ ~ QQQ/. FiLm 3821N1AQQOl ~ Group ! 161/1~he VauLt 161 _./0~1987 958? PLot PL~ ~87 ~ OO(X FiLm 3821N1AOO01 Group ! 161/1~hs VauLt 161 01/1~/1987 ~11 PLot PLan ~11 ~ QQ(X FiLm 3821.1A0001 Group i 161/120/The vault 161 Q1/19/1987 ~ PLot PLan~ ~ QOQ5 FiLm 3821N1AQOQI Group ! 161/120/The V~Lt 161 01/21/1987 ~98 PLot PLan~98 ~ OOQ5 FiLm 3821N1AOOO1 Group Z 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 Q1/~/1987 ~ PLot PLan ~ ~ 0005 FiLm 3821H1AOOOl Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 01/2~1987 9606 PLot PLan 9606 ~ 0005 FiLm 3821,1A0001 Group ] 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 01/26/1987 961o PLot PLan 9610 ~ QO(O FiLm ~821mAOOO1 Group ! 161/l~/The vault 161 01/30/1987 9~0 PLot PLm 9720 ~ QOQ5 FiLm 3821N1AOOO1 Group i 161/120~he VauLt 161~A~/~/1987 ~15 PLot PLan ~15 ~ QQQS FiLm ~821mAOOOl Group Z 161/1~ha VauLt 161 02/~/1987 9713 PLot PLan 9713 ~ QOQ5 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl Group ! 161/120~he VauLt R~ESTY...RR~I City ~ T~Lo Page 2 ~1~/199~ D~truction State Lilting 12:37:30. D~. item Rat. File Reference # Stor~e 14edto net. Dote R~. Brief Decri~ton Type Security CLam Store Location Location Rate, 161 02/~/1987 9716 PLot PLan 9716 ~ QQ05 Film 3821NIAQOQ1 Group ! 161/120/TheVoutt 161 02/13/1997 9616 PLot PLan 9616 PP QQ05 Film 3821NIA(XX)1 Group [ 161/120~he Vault 161 02/1~1997 9625 PLot PLan 9625 ~ O(X)5 Film )821NIA~01 Group ! 161/12~The Vault 161 02/2~1987 9629 PLot PLan 9629 PP QO(O Film 3821HIA~01 Group ] 161/120/TheVoutt 161 02/20/1997 9637 PLot PLan 9637 ~ 0005 Film 3821H1AO001 GrokF ! 161/120/The Vault 161 02/20/1997 W~8 PLat PLan 9648 ~ 0005 Film $821N1AO001 Group ! 161/12~The Vault 161 02/26/1987 96~2 Plot PLan 96~2 ~ 0005 Film )821N1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 02/26/1987 9652 PLot PLan 9652 PP 0005 Film 3821N1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 ~/2~1997 9653 PLot Plan 9653 PP QOQ5 Film 3821N1AOOO1 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 02/2~1997 9(~3 PLot PLan 9bG) PP 0005 Film 3821N1AO001 Gro~ Z 161/120/The Vault 161 03/~/1997 9669 PLot PLan 9669 PP OQQ5 Film 3821H1AQOQ1 Group [ 161/120/The Vault 161 ~/~/1997 9666 PLot PLan 9666 ~ O(X)5 Film )821NIAQ(X)1 Group ! 161/120~he Vault 161 ~/05/1997 ~71 PLot PLan 9671 ~ QOQ5 Ft tm 3821N1AOO Q1 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 ~/~/1997 96~ PLot PLon 96~ ~ 0005 Film 3821N1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 ~10911997 9665 PLot PLan 9665 PP QQQ5 Film 3821N1AQQQ1 Group ! 161/120~he Vault 161 03/10/1997 9683 PLot PLan 9683 PP QQQ5 Film 3821NIAQ(X)l Group [ 161/120~he Vault 161 ~/10/1997 9~7 PLot PLon 9~7 PP Q005 Film 3821NIAQOQ1 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 ~/10/1997 F797 PLot PLan 9?97 ~ QQQ5 Film 3821M1AOOQ1 Group ] 161/120~he VouLt RRDESTY...RR061 City of T~Le Page 3 0~/06/1~96 Deltru~tto~ iLlLIB Lilting 1~:37:3Q Do{ Ztem Re!. FILe Reference # Storage fiedie Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Type Security CLass Store Location Lecation Reference 161 03/16/1~87 W~5 PLot PLan W~5 PP 0005 Fi Lm ~821N1AO(X)l Group ! t61/120/The Vault 161 0)/18/1~87 gd86 PLot PLan W~6 FP 000~ Ft Lm 3821141A0001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 0)/20/1H7 WA~8 PLot PLan ~88 PP 0005 Film )821H1AO001 Group ! 161/120rrhe Vault 161 03/20/1H7 ~ PLot PLan ~0 PP (XX)5 Film )821H1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 0)/20/1H7 f6f3 PLot PLan ~F_t 'PP 0005 Film )821N1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 0)/Z0/1~87 9702 PLot PLan 9702 PP 0005 Film 3821H1AO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 03/20/1H7 970~ PLot PLan 970~ PP O00S Film )821H1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 0)/21,/1H7 97~ PLot PLan 9734 PP 0005 Film 3821N1AO001 ~ Groop ! 161/120/The Vault 161 ..,/30/1H7 9763 PLot PLan 9763 PP 0005 Film 3821HIAO001 GrotF ! 161/120/The Vault 161 04/06/1H7 9752 PLot PLan 9752 PP 0005 Film ]821141A0001 Group i 161/120/The Vault 16104/07/1987 9761 PLot PLan 9761 PP 0005 Film )821H1AO001 Group [ 161/120/The Vault 161 04/07/1~87 9762 PLot PLan 9762 PP O00S Film 3821NIAO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 06/1/,/1987 9591 PLot PLan 9591 PP 0006 FiLm 3E1N1AQQ01 Group ! 161/1:~0/The VauLt 161 06/14/1987 9789 PLot Pten 9789 P~ 0005 FiLm 38~¶IllAQ001 Group [ 161/1:~0/The VauLt 161 06/16/1987 9765 PLot PLan 9765 PP 0005 FILm 38~lH1AO001 Group % 161/120/The VauLt 161 04/16/1987 9772 PLot PLan 9772 PP 0005 FiLm 3821141AOQ01 Group [ 161/120rrhe vault 161-.N-/17/1987 9767 PLot PLan 9767 PP 0005 FiLm 3821NIAO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 04/17/1987 9770 PLot PLan 9770 PP 0005 FiLm 3821141A0001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt R~ESTY...RR061 City of TmzecuL8 Page ~1~/199~ Datruction StBt~ Listing D~. Item Rat. FiLe Reference # Storage I1edia Ref. Date Ref. Brief I)escri~ion Type Security Ct.s Store Location Location Refet~.~e 161 ~/2~1987 9798 Plot Plan 9798 ~ 0005 FiLm 3821M1AO001 Group I 161/12~The VauLt 161 ~/2~1981 9/90 Pt~ Plan 9790 PP 0005 Film 3821NIAO001 Group ] 161/12~The VauLt 161 ~/2~1987 9791 Plot PLan 9791 ~ 0005 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Oro~ i 161/120/The VauLt 161 05/02/1987 9810 Plot PLan 9810 ~ 0005 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group I 161/12~The VauLt 161 ~/~/1987 9802 Plot Plan 9802 PP 0005 Film ~821H1AO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 05/~/1987 980~ PLot PL~ 980~ ~ 0005 Film ~821N1AO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 05/M/1987 9805 Plot PLan 9805 ~ 0005 FiLm ~821NIAO001 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 05/08/1987 9838 Plot Plan 9~8 ~ 0005 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 05/11/1987 9839 Plot Plan 9839 ~ 0005 Film 3821N1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 05/12/1987 9807 Plot Plan 9807 PP 0005 FiLm 3821Hl&O001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 05/1~/1~7 9808 Plot Plan 9808 PP 00~ Film ~821H1A~01 Group ] 161/12~The Vault 161 05/1~/1987 9809A PLot Plan 9809A ~ OOB FiLm 3821NIAO001 Group ! 161/120/The VmuLt 161 05/13/1987 9833 PLot PLan 9~3 ~ OOQ5 FiLm 3821N1AIX)Q1 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 05/1~/1987 98~1 PLot PLan 9861 PP QQff FiLm 3821.1A0001 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 05/18/1987 981~ PLot PLan 981~ ~ QOQ5 FiLm 3821.1A0001 Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 05/1~1087 9816 PLot PLan 9816 ~ ~ FiLm 3821NIAOOO1 Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 ~/18/1987 9820 PLot PLan 982Q ~ QO05 FiLm 3821N1A0801 Group ! 161/120/The vault 161 05/19/1987 9828 PLot PLan 9828 ~ QOQ5 FiLm ~821N1AOOOl Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt. R~ESTY...RR~I Ctty of TaBSCutS Page 5 021~/199~ Detructim Status ListiN -12:37:~ Dec !tm Ret. FiLe Reference # $torage Nedia Ref. Bate Ref. Brief D.cription Type 'Security CLass Storage Location Location Reference 161 ~/1~1~7 9836 PLot PLm 9e36 ~ QOQ5 Film 3821N1AQOQ1 Group z 161/1~nhe Vault 161 e/1~1~? 9835 PL~ PLm ge35 ~ (XX)5 F! Lm 3821N1AQO Q1 Group I 161/120~he Vault 161 05/1~1~7 9836 PLot Pt~ 9836 ~ 00~ Film 3821N1AQO01 Group ! 161/12~The Vault 161 ~/01/1~7 9827 PLot Pt~ 9827 ~ ~ Film 3821.1A0001 Group Z 161/12Q/The Vault 161 ~10111~7 98/48 PLot PL~ 9668 ~ 0005 Film 3821.1A0001 Group ! 161/1~he Vault 161 ~/~/1~7 ~ PLot PL~ 98~ ~ QQQ5 Film 3821M1AOOOl Group z 161/l~/The Vault 161 ~/~/1~7 ~ PLot PL~ 9876 PP 0005 Ftlm 3821N1AOOO1 Group I 161/1~he Vault 161 ~/1~1987 9636 PLot PLm 963~ PP 0005 FILm 3821N1AOOO1 ~ Group z 161/1~b Vault 161 ,~/~/1~7 98~ PLot PL~ ~ ~ QOQ5 Film 3821N1AOOO1 Group I 161/12Q/The Vault 161 ~/~/19~ ~56 Plot Plan ~56 ~ QO0 Film 3821NIAO01 Group I 161/12Q/The Vault 161 ~/~/19~ ~53 PLot Pton ~53 PP 006 FiLm 3821H1AO001 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 ~/28/1988 ~28 PLot Plan 9628 ~ 0005 FILm 3821N1AO001 Group I 161/1~/The V~utt 161 0~18/1988 ~? PLot PiN ~? ~ 000300011g0 FiLe 3821NIAO001 Group I 161/l~/The Vault 161 02/21/1990 ~ PLot Pt~ 800~ pp ~ Film 3821M1AO001 Group I 161/1~/The Vault 86 Records Processed ITEM NO. 9 APPROV~T. CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT : TO: FROM: City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: March 8, 1994 SUBJECT: Release Faithful Performance Warranty Bonds and Material and Labor Bonds in Tract No. 21674-F. PREPARED BY: ~ Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize the release of Street, and Water and Sewer Improvement Faithful Performance Warranty Bonds and Material and Labor Bonds in Tract No. 21674-F, and direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. BACKGROUND: On January 12, 1990, the City Council approved the Final Map for Tract No. 21674-5, and the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision agreements with Mesa Homes (now Kemper Real Estate Development Co.) 27555 Ynez Road, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92591 for the improvement of streets, and installation of sewer and water systems. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company as follows: 1. Bond No. 3S 687 485 000 in the amount of $259,000.00 to cover street improvements. 2. Bond No. 3S 687 486 00 in the amount of $32,000.00to cover water improvements. 3. Bond No. 3S 687 487 00 in the amount of $41,000.00to cover sewer improvements. Pege 1 of 2 pwO2%agdrpt~94~,0308~tr21674F.exo Bond No's. 3S 687 485 00, 3S 687 486 00, and 3S 687 487 00 in the amounts of ~ 129,500.00, 816,000.00, end $20,500.00, respectively, to cover material and labor for street, water, and sewer improvements. On December 17, 1991, the City Council accepted these improvements and retained the following secured amounts for a one (1) year maintenance period: Streets: Bond No. 3S 687 485 00 $25,900.00 Water: Bond No. 3S 687 486 00 $3,200.00 Sewer: Bond No. 3S 687 487 00 $4,100.00 TOTAL: $33,200.00 The developer was required to post Material and Labor Bonds to ensure payment to suppliers ahd workers. These bonds ere maintained in effect for a minimum period of time determined by statute after the Governmental Agency has accepted the public improvements. Since no claims have been filed with the City Clerk, and adequate time has passed, Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the release of the Material and Labor Bonds. The warranty period having been exceeded, and any and all necessary repairs and replacements having been satisfactorily completed, Staff also recommends the release of the Faithful Performance Warranty Bonds (3S 687 485 00, 3S 687 486 00, and 3S 687 487 00). The affected street is Corte Salinas. Attachment: Vicinity Map Page 2 of 2 pwO2%egdrpt%94%O308%tr21674F.exo To Ceem Project Site \ / Kale l's4OOO' 'ITEM NO. I0 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAl CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer March 8, 1994 Final Parcel Map No. 27509 PREPAREI~~m D. Faul, Assistant Engineer - Land Development RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Final Parcel Map No. 27509 subject to the Conditions of Approval. BACKGROUND: Tentative Parcel Map No. 27509, Amendment No. 3, was approved by the City of Temecula Planning Director, Gary Thornhill, on February 18, 1993. The Developer has met all of the Conditions of Approval. Final Parcel Map No. 27509 is a two (2) parcel lot commercial subdivision of 3.25 acres located on the westerly side of Diaz Road between Rancho California Road and Rancho Way. The site currently has an existing packing house located on Parcel No. 2 of the Parcel Map. Surrounding land uses include vacant land and manufacturing uses. The site is zoned manufacturing service commercial (M-SC) as are adjacent parcels. The established zoning on the property conforms with the land use designation on the General Plan for the City of Temecula. The following fees have been deferred for Final Parcel Map No. 27509: Area Drainage Fees Staphen's K-Rat Mitigation Fees Fire Mitigation Fees Public Facilities Fee Traffic Signal Mitigation Fees Due prior to grading permit Due prior to grading permit Due prior to building permit Due prior to building permit Due prior to building permit No bonds are required because there are no public improvements associated with this parcel map, FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMFNTS: 2. 3. 4. 5. Development Fee Checklist Project Location Map Final Parcel Map No. 27509 Conditions of Approval Fees & Securities Report CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST CASE NO.: Parcel MaD No. 97509 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. FEE Habitat Conservation Plan (K-Rat) Flood Control (ADP) Public Facility Traffic Signal Mitigation Fire Mitigation CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Due prior to grading permit Due prior to grading permit Due prior to building permit Due prior to building permit Due prior to building permit r:%agdmt%g4%O308%pm275091~p p,,ANCHO 2, I/ICINITY MAP N~T TO 5'C,41,E i PLANNING DEPARTMENT GENERAL REQUIREMENTS CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Tentative Parcel Map No. 27509, Amendment No. 3. Project Description: To subdivide a 3.35 lot into two lots in the Manufacturing Service Commercial (M-SC) zone. Assessor's Parcel No.: 921-040-024 Approval Date: February 18, 1993 Expiration Date: February 18, 1993 e Thetentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed below. e The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City. of Temecula, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Tentative Parcel Map No. 27509, Amendment No. 3 which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim; action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, fie subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. .Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. Future development. of Parcel No. 2 will require subsequent approvals. · .... The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined in the County Health Department's transmittal dated July 13, 1992, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Rood Control District's letter dated July 14, 1992, a copy of which is attached. If the project lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of City of Temecula Land Division Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the City prior to issuance of Occupancy Permits. The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County Fire Department's letter dated October 14, 1992, a copy of which is attached. 8. Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following: Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the Manufacturing Service Commercial (M-SC) zone. PRIOR Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion · control measures as approved by the Director of Building and Safety. TO RECORDATION OF THE RNAL MAP An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of'the recorded final map to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. The following notes shall be placed on the ECS sheet: This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar 'Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations. 10. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director: a. A copy of the Final Map~ - b. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans. c. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). PRIOR TO GRADING PERMIT 11. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply With the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying .the appropriate fee .set forth in that ordinance for Parcel No. 2 only. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. 12. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director: a. A copy of the Final Grading Plans. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of Public Works. it is understood that the developer correctly shows on the tentative map or site plan all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 13. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all on-site flat work and improvements) construction shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right- of-way. 14. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 15. All. improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. 16.. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act;any subdivision which is part of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS: ~7. The final grading plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. 18.' All lot drainage shall be directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales independent of any other lot. 19. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board.. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. 20. The earth swale alo{qg. southerly and westerly of the project shall be grass-lined. Ultimate design and improvements shall be provided at plot plan stage. 21. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies as deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works: {Amended at the Planning Director's Healing, February 18, 1993) San Diego Regional Water Quality Planning Department Department of Public Works Riverside County Health Department General Telephone Southern California Edison Company Southern California Gas Company 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check, The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections, The erosion control plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a .weed-free condition and shell be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Department of. Public Works, A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Riverside County Rood Control and Water Conservation District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has been already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. The developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. A Flood Plain Development Permit and drainage study shall be submitted to the Department of Public Worksfor review and approval. The drainage study shall include, but not be limited to, the following criteria: Drainage and flood protection facilities which will protect all structures by diverting site runoff to streets or approved storm drain facilities as directed by the Department of Public Works. Adequate provision shall be made for the acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. The impact to the site from any flood zone as shown on the FEMA flood hazard map and. any necessary mitigation to protect the site. d. Identify and mitigate impacts of grading to any adjacent floodway. The location of existing and post development l O0-year floodplain and floodway shall be shown on the improvement plan. The subdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI or Ordinance No, 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate facilities as approved by the Department of Public Works, A drainage channel and/or flood protection well will be required to protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to Streets, or to a storm drain. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. PRIOR 35. 36. 37. ' The subdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration o'~ the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing facilities or by securing a drainage easement. A drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners for the release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy of the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for re.view.prior to recordation. The location of the recorded easement shall be delineated on the grading plan. The site is in an area identified on the flood hazards maps as Rood Zone "B". All structures shall be protected from this hazard. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the developer shall at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map of approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection w..ith the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at the developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. ~ior to issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist aholl bc rctainod by thc developer for consultation and comment on the propoaod grading with respect to potentia! polcontologioal impacts. Should the paloontologiat find the potential is high for impact to significant rcsouroos, a pro grading mo0ting botwcon thc paleontologist and thc oxoa,,ation and gr-~ding contractor shall bo arranged. When noocso-~ry, the paleontologist or roprcsontativc 3hall havc the authority to temporarily divert, rodiroct or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fo~,~ils. (Amended at the Planning Director's Hearing, February 18, 1993) TO THE ISSUANCE OF ENCROACHMENT PERMITS: ." All necessary grading permit requirements shall have been submitted/accomplished to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. Improvements plans, including but no limited to, streets, parkway trees, street lights, driveways, drive aisles, parking lot lighting, drainage facilities and paving shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer on 24' x 36" mylar sheets and approved by the Department of Public Works. Final plans (and profiles on streets) shall show the location of existing utility facilities and easements as directed by the Department of Public Works. The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans to be submitted to the Department of Public Works: 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. PRIOR 43. Flow line grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos. 207/207A and 401 (curb and sidewalk). All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as approved by the Department of Public Works. de All concentrated draina~je directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through under-sidewalk drains. The minimum centerline street grade shall be 0.50 percent or as otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works. Improvement plans per City Standards for the private streets or drives shall be required for review and approval by the Department of Public Works. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider.. Telephone, cable TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired' in the residence.' All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater,'shall be installed underground. All conditions of the Grading Permit and Encroachment Permit shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. TO RECORDATION OF FINAL MAP: The developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to 'approval by the Department of Public Works. . a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, traffic signals, and other traffic control devices as appropriate. Storm drain facilities. c. Landscaping (slopes and parkways). d. Erosion control and slope protection. e. Sewer and domestic water systems. f. All trails, as required by the City's Master Plans. g. Undergrounding of p~oposed utility distribution lines. 45. 46. 48. 49. 50. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: San Diego Regional Water Quality Rancho California Water .District Eastern Municipal Water District City of Temecula Fire Bureau Planning Department .Department of Public Works Riverside County Health Department CA'IV Franchise General Telephone Southern California Edison Company; and Southern California Gas Company All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. Sufficient right-of-way along Diaz Road shall be conveyed for public use to provide for a 50-foot half-width right-of-way. Existing improvements shall be reviewed prior to recordation of the final map; and if not per current standards of the City of Temecula, they shall be replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated and noted on the final map. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to approval of the final map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary.. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site drainage for facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating "drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions." An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The following information shall be on the ECS: a. The delineation of the area within the 100-year floodplain, b. Special study zone, 51. The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 52. 53. PRIOR The developer shall deposit with the Department of Public Works a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fees, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. The developer shall notify the City's CA'iV Franchises of the .Intent to Develop.. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street improvements. TO BUILDING PERMIT: 54. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. 'The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 55. · 56. Grading of the' subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, the approved grading plan, the conditions of grading permit, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required underthe EIR/Negative Declaration for the project..The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which developer requests its building permits for the project, or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to developer. Concurrently with executing this Agreement, developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to .exceed $10,000. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; provided that developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY: 57. All improvements shall be completed and in place per the approved plans, including bUt not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C, pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, drainage facilities, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets, 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. The subdivider shall provide "STOP" controls at the intersection of local streets with arterial streets as directed by the Department of Public Works. Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied only as directed by the Department of Public Works at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section Nos. 37, 39 and 94 of the State Standard Specifications. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Fire Department transmittal dated October 14, 1992, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Rood Control District's transmittal dated July 14, 1992, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Health Department transmittal dated July 13, 1992, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho California Water District transmittal dated July 15, 1992, a copy of which is attached. CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT PARCEL MAP NO. 27509 IMPROVEMENTS Street and Drainage Water Sewer TOTAL Maintenance Retention Monument Security DATE: February 18, 1993 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY SECURITY $ 0.00 $- 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 ~ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Note: No bonds are required because there are no public improvements associated with this parcel map. DEVELOPMENT FEES City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs RCFCD Drainage Fee Due Fire Mitigation Fee Due Signal Mitigation Fee - SMD # Road and Bridge Benefit Fee Other Development Fees $ 0.00 $ T.B.D.* $ T.B.D.* $ T.B.D.* $ N/A $ N/A SERVICE FEES Planning Fee Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan Check Fee Inspection Fee Monument Inspection Fee Fees Paid To Date Balance of Fees Due 54.00 4.00 750.00 0.00 0.00 808.00 0.00 * T.B.D. - To Be Dete~ed r,~NdrptSM~eWm27SOg/eJp ITEM NO. I 1 ORDINANCE NO. 94-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION NO. 18.28.A.C.(10) OF ORDINANCE NO. 30 PERTAINING TO TTTF~ TYPE OF PAVING MATERIAL REQUI~ED FOR ACCESS TO SECOND DWELLING UNrrS THE CITY'COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFO~, DOES ORDAIN AS FOT-LOWS: Section 1. City Ordinance No. 90-04 adopted by reference certain portions of the Non-Codi~ed Riverside County Ordinances, including Ordinance No.' 348. Section 18.28.a.c.(10) of Ordinance No. 348 is hereby mended to read as follows: "(10) Any second unit placed more than 150 feet from a pubtic right-of-way shall be required to provide all-weather access for emergency vehicles from a pubficly maintained road. Aspbaltic or concrete paving is required for all-weather access; however, this requirement may be waived if all of the following conditions are met: A soils report (pr,~wed by a licensed soil or civil engineer) is submitted to the Depamnent of Public Works for approval. The report shall determine the stability of the soils at the project site and contain recommendations for alternative material types and any associated drainage facilities that will support a 30,000 pound emergency vehicle. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall record a waiver, releasing the City of Temecula of any liability in the event that emergency vehicles cannot utilize the drive lane. The all-weather access shall be conanuously maintained by the property owner such that it will support a 30,000 pound emergency vehicle at all times. The City of Temecula will not accept or maintain the roadway until it has been improved to City of Temecula Standards as identified in the Circulation Element of the General Plan. * Section 2. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance is severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this ordinance to be invalid, such decisions shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. 0rde 94-06 Seerion 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days afUn' its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the fill] text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 diys"f/6t~' adopti~m~0'f this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. Seerion 4.' PASSk':B, APPRO~ AND ADOFrED titis 8th day of March, 1994. ATTEST: Ron Robens, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss crrY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify ~ ~he foregoing Ordinance No. 94-06 was duly introduced and placed upon i~s first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on ~he 22nd day of February, 1994, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed a regular meeting of the City Council on the 8th day of March, 1994 by the following wll call vote: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: CO~CH..,MBV[BERS: CO~CILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk · ITEM NO. 12 ORDINANCE NO. 94-07 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING LAND DEVF~LOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The official zoning map of the City of Temecula, entitled "Temecula/Rancho California Area" as adopted pursuant to Section 34 of Ordinance No. 90- 04, is amended as shown which map is made a pan of this ordinance. Section 2. Article XVIIa of Ordinance No. 348, as adopted by reference pursuant to Ordinance 90-04, is amended by adding thereto a new Section 17.46 to read as follows: Section 17.46 SP ZONE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164. a. Planning Area 1. (1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 1 of Specific Plan No. 164 shah be the same as those uses permitted in Article VI, Section 6.1 of Ordinance No. 348. (2) The development standards for Planning Area 1 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the same as those standards identified in Article VI, Section 6.2 of Ordinance no. 348, except that the development standards set froth in Article VI, Section 6.2(a), Co), (c), (d), and (e)(1), (2), and (3) shall be deleted and replaced by the following: A. Building height shall not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of thirty-five feet (35'). B. Lot area shall be not less than ten thousand (10,000) square feet. The minimum lot area shall be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site. C. The minimum avenge width of that portion of a lot to be used as a building site shall be seventy feet (70') with a minimum average depth of one hundred feet (100'). That portion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots shall have a minimum width of twenty feet (20'). 5\orals\94-07 I D. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be seventy feet (70'), except that lots fronting on knucldes or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30'). E. The front yard shall be not less than twenty-five feet' (25'), measured from the existing street line or from any future street line as shown in any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure. F. Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than ten feet (10'). Side yards on comer and reverse comer lots shall be not less than twenty-five feet (25') from the existing street line or from any future street line as shown on any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure, upon which the main building sides, except that where the lot is less than fifty feet (50') wide the yard need not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the width ofthe lot. G. The rear yard shall not be less than twenty feet (20'). In addition, the following standards shall also apply: AA: No lot shall have more than twenty-five percent (25 %) of its net area covered by Buildings or structures. the curb. BB. No garage shall be situated closer than thirty feet (30') from the face of (3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as those requirements identified in Article VI of Ordinance No. 348. b. Plannin~ Area 2. (1) The uses permiRed in Planning Area 2 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the same as those uses permitted in Article VI, Section 6.1 of Ordinance No. 348. (2) The development standards for Planning Area 2 of Specific Plan No. 164'shall be the same as those standards identified in Article VI, Section 6.2 of Ordinance No. 348, except that the development standards set forth in Article VI, Section 6.2(a), Co), (c), (d), and (e)(1) and (2) shall be deleted and replaced by the following: A. Building height shall not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of thirty-five feet (35'). B. Lot area shall be not less than four thousand (4,000) square feet. The minimum lot area shall be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site. 5\ords\94-07 2 C. The minimum average width of that portion of a lot to be used as a building site shall be thirty-five feet (35') with a minimum average depth of eighty feet (80'). That portion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots shall have a minimum width of twenty feet (20'). D. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be forty feet (40'), except that lots fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30'). E. The front yard shall be not less than' thirty feet (30'), measured from the existing street line or from any future street line as shown in any Specific Phn of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure. F. Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than five feet (5'). However, if a zero lot line design is utilized, the alternate side yard may not be less than ten feet (10'). Side yards on comer and reverse corner lots shall be not less than ten feet (10') from the existing street line or from any future street line as shown on any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure, upon which the main building sides, except that where the lot is less than fifty feet (50') wide, the yard need not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the lot. In addition, the following standard shall also apply: AA. No lot shall have more than sixty percent (60%) of its net area covered by buildings or structures. (3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as those requirements identified in Article VI of Ordinance No. 348. c. Planning Area 3. (1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 3 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the same as those uses permitted in Article VI, Section 6.1 or Ordinance No. 348. (2) The development standards for Planning Area 3 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the same as those standards identified in Article VI, Section 6.2 of Ordinance No. 348, except that the development standards set forth in Article VI, Section 6.2(a), Co), (c), (d), and (e)(1) and (2) shall be deleted and replaced by the following: A. Building height shall not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of thirty-five feet (35'). B. Lot area shall be not less than four thousand (4,000) square feet. The minimum lot area shall be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site. 5~ords\94-07 3 C. 'The minimum average width of that portion of a lot to be used as a bufiding site shall be thirty-five feet (35 ') with a minimum average depth of eighty feet (80'). That portion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots shall ~have a minimum width of twenty feet (20'). D. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be forty feet (40'), except that lots fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30'). E. The front yard shall be not less than thirty feet (30'), measured from the existing street line or from any future street line as shown in any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure. F. Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than five feet (5'). However, if a zero lot line design is utilized, the alternate side yard may not be less than ten feet (10'). Side yards on comer and reverse comer lots shall be not less than ten feet (10') form the existing street line or from any future street line as shown on any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure, upon which the main building sides, except that where the lot is less than fifty feet (50') wide, the yard need not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the width of the lot. In addition, the following standard shall also apply: AA. No lot shall have more than sixty percent (60%) of its net area covered buildings or structures. (3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as those requirements identified in Article VI of Ordinance No. 348. d. Planning Area 4. (1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 4 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the same as those uses permitted in Article VI, Section 6.1 of Ordinance No. 384. (2) The development standards for Planning Area 4 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the same as those standards identified in Article VI, Section 6.2 of Ordinance No. 348, except that the development standards set forth in Article VI, Section 6.2(a), (b), (c), (d), and (e)(1) and (2) shall be deleted and replaced by the following: A. Building height shall not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of thirty-five feet (35'). B. Lot area shall be not less than four thousand (4,000) square feet. The minimum lot area shall be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site. 5~ord.X94-07 4 C. The minimum average width of that portion of a lot to be used as a building site shall be thirty-five feet (35') with a minimum average depth of eighty feet (80'). That portion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots shall have a minimum width of twenty feet (20'). D. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be forty feet (40'), except that lots fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30'). E. The front yard shall be not less than thirty feet (30'), measured from the existing street line or from any future street line as shown in any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure. F. Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than five feet (5'). However, if a zero lot line design is utilized, the alternate side yard may not be less than ten feet (10'). Side yards on corner and reverse corner lots shall be not less than ten feet (10') from the existing street line or from any future street line as shown on any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure, upon which the main building sides, except that where the lot is less than fifty feet (50') wide, the yard need not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the width of the lot. In addition, the following standard shall also apply: AA. No lot shall have more than sixty percent (60%) of its net area covered by buildings or structures. (3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as those requirements identified in Article VI of Ordinance No. 348. e. Planning Area 5. (1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 5 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the same as those uses permitted in Article VI, Section 6.1 of Ordinance No. 348. (2) The development standards for Planning Area 5 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the same as those standards identified in Article VI, Section 6.2 of Ordinance No. 348, except that the development standards set forth in Article VI, Section 6.2(a), Co), (c), (d), and (e)(1) and (2) shall be deleted and replaced by the following: A. Building height shall not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of thirty-five feet (35'). 5~ord.X94-07 5 B. Lot area shall be not less than four thousand (4,000) square feet. The minimum lot area shah be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site. C. The minimum average width of that portion of a lot to be used as a building site shall be thirty-five feet 05') with a minimum average depth of eighty feet (80'). That portion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots shall have a minimum width of twenty feet (20'). D. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be forty feet (40'), except that lots fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30'). E. The front yard shall be not less than thirty feet 00'), measured from the existing sweet line or from any future street line as shown in any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure. F. Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than five feet (5'). However, if a zero-lot line design is utilized, the alternate side yard may not be less than ten feet (10'). Side yards on comer and reverse comer lots shall be not less than tea feet (10') from the existing street line or from any future street line as shown on any Specific plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure, upon which the main building sides, except that where the lot is less than fifty feet (50') wide, the yard need not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the width of the lot. In addition, the following standard shall also apply: AA. No lot shall have more than sixty percent (60%) of its net area covered by buildings or covered by buildings or structures. (3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as those requirements identified in Article VI of Ordinance No. 348. f. Planning, Area 6. (1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 6 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the same as those uses permitted in Article VI, Section 6.1 of Ordinance No. 348. (2) The development standards for Planning Area 6 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the same as those standards identified in Article VI, Section 6.2 of Ordinance No. 348, except that the development standards set forth in Article VI, Section 6.2(a),' (b), (c), (d), and (e)(1) and (2) shall be deleted and replaced by the following: 5~ord,\94-07 6 A. Building height shall not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of thirty-five feet (35'). B. Lot area shall be not less than four thousand (4,000) square feet. The minimum lot area shall be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is a used solely for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site. C. The minimum average width of that portion of a lot to be used as a building site shall be thirty-five feet (35') with a minimum average depth of eighty feet (80'). That portion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots shall have a minimum width of twenty feet (20'). D. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be forty feet (40'), except that lots fronfing on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30'). E. The front yard shall be not less than thirty feet (30'), measured from the existing street line or from any future street line as shown in any Specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure. F. - Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than five feet (S'). However, if a zero--lot line design is utilized, the alternate side yard may not be less than ten feet (10'). Side yards on corner and reverse corner lots shall be not less than ten feet (10') from the existing street line or from any future street line as shown on any specific Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure, upon which the main building sides, except that where the lot is less than fifty feet (50') wide, the yard need not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the width of the lot. In addition, the following standard shill also apply: AA. No lot shall have more than sixty percent (60%) of its net area covered by buildings or structures. (3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as those requirements identified in Article VI of Ordinance No. 348. g. Planning Area (1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 7 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be single family residential and park. (2) The development standards for Planning Area 7 of Specific Plan No. 164'shall be as follows: thirty-five feet (35'). Building height shall not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of 5\ords\94-07 7 square feet. Lot area shall .be not less than Three Thousand Four Hundred (3,400) C. The minimum width of a lot shall be Forty feet (40') and the minimum depth shall be Eight-Five feet (85'). D. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be forty feet (40'), except that lots fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of Fifteen feet (15'). E. Minimum yard requirements area as follows: (1) The front yard shall be not less than Ten feet (10'), measured from the front property line. (2) Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than Five feet (5'). However, if a zero-lot line .design is utilized, the alternate side yard may not be less than Ten feet (10') from the existing side property line. (3) The rear yard shall not be less than Five feet (5'). (4) Pool setbacks shall be 3 feet for side yard and 3 feet for rear yard. Patio cover setbacks shah be 3 feet for side yard and 3 feet for (6) Room/building additions shall adhere to the same setback requirements as those of the main structures. (7) Yard Encmachments. Where yards are required by this ordinance, they shall be open and unobstructed from the ground to the sky and kept free of all structural encroachments, except as follows: a. Outside stairways or landing places, if unroofed. and unenclosed, may extend into a required side yard for a distance of not exceed three (3) feet and/or inw the required rear yard a distance of not to exceed five (5) feet. b. Cornices, canopies, and other similar architectural futures not providing additional floor space within the building may extend into a required yard not to exceed one (1) foot. Eaves may extend three (3) feet to a required yard. One (1) pergola or one (1) covered but unenclosed passenger landing may extend into either side yard provided it does not reduce the side yard below five (5) feet and its depth does not exceed twenty (20) feet. 5\ordsX94-07 8 F. Automobile parking shall provide one (1) two car garage per each dwelling unit. (3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as those requirements identified in Ordinance No. 348. h. Planning Area 8. (1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 8. of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be single family residential. (2) The development standards for Planning Area 8 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be as follows: A. Building height shall not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of thirty-five feet (35'). B. Lot area shall be not less than Ten Thousand (10,000) square feet. C. The minimum width of a lot shall be Eighty feet (80') and the minimum depth shall be One hundred twenty five feet (125'). D. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be Eighty feet (80'), except that lots fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of Twenty feet (20'). E. Minimum yard requirements area as follows: (1) The front yard shall be not less than Twenty feet (20'), measured from the front property line. (2) Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than Five feet (5'). However, if a zero-lot line design is utilized, the alternate side yard may not be less .than Ten feet (10') from the existing side property line. (3) The rear yard shall not be less than Twenty feet (20'). (4) Pool setbacks shall be 3 feet for side yard and 3 feet for rear yard. Patio cover setbacks shall be 3 feet for side yard and 3 feet for (6) Room/building additions shall adhere to the same sethack requirements as those of the main structures. 5\orals\94-07 9 (7) Yard Encroachments. Where yards are required by this ordinance, they shall be open and unobstructed from-the ground to the sky and kept free of all structural encroachments, except as follows: a. Outside stairways or landing places, if unroofed and unenclosed, may extend into a required side yard for a distance of not exceed three (3) feet and/or into the required rear yard a distance of not to exceed five (5) feet. b. Cornices, canopies, and other similar architectural features not providing additional floor space within the building may extend into a required yard not to exceed one (1) foot. Eaves may extend three (3) feet to a required yard. One (1) pergola or one (1) covered but unenclosed passenger landing may extend into either side yard provided it does not reduce the side yard below five (5) feet and its depth does not exceed twenty (20) feet. dwelling unit. Automobile parking shall provide one (I) two car garage per each (3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as those requirements identified in Ordinance No. 348. i. Planning Area 9. (Commercial "B ") (i ) The uses permitted in Planning Area 9 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the same as those uses permitted in Article IX, Section 9.1 of Ordinance No. 348, except that the uses permitted pursuant to Section 9.1(a)(1), (5), (6), (7), (9), (14), (15), (17), (22), (23), (28), (29), (35), (39), (42), (45), (48), (49), (50), (51), (53), (54), (59), (61), (66), (68), (69), (75), (77), (79), (80), (82), (84), (86), (89), (91), (92), and 03); and Co)(1), (3) through (8), (10) through (12), and (14) through (20) shall not be permitted. In addition, the permitted uses identified under Section 9. l(a) shall also include churches. (2) The development standards for Planning Area 9 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the same as those standards identified in Article IX, Section 9.4 of Ordinance No. 348, except that the development standard set forth in Article IX, Section 9.4Co) shall be deleted and replaced by the following: A. The front yard shall be not less than twenty-five feet (25') and the rear yard shall be not less than twenty feet (20'). The front sethack shall be measured from the specific plan street line. The rear sethack shall be measured from the specific plan street line. The rear setback shall be measured from the existing rear lot line or from any recorded 5\ords\94-07 10 B. There are no side yard requirements, except were the side yard abuts a residentially zoned area, in which case buildings shall be set back twenty-five feet (25') from the side lot line. Each side setback shall be measured from the side lot line, or from the specific plan street line. In addition, the following standards shall also apply: AA. No lot shall have more than fifty percent (50%) of its net area covered by buildings or structures. BB. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be twenty-five feet (25'). CC. The minimum average width of that portion of a lot to be used as a building site shall be twenty-five feet (25') with a minimum avenge depth of one hundred feet .(100'). (3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as those requirements identified in Article IX of Ordinance No. 348. j. Planning Area 10. (Office) (1) The sues permitted in Planning Area 10 of Specific Plan No. 164 shah be the same as those uses permitted in Article IX, Section 9.1 of Ordinance No. 348, except that the uses permitted pursuant to Section 9.1(a)(1), (5), (6), (7), (9), (14), (15), (17), (22), (23), (28), (29), (35), (39), (42), (45), (48), (49), (50), (51), (53), (54), (59), (61), '(66), (68), (69), (75), (77), (79), (80), (82), (84), (86), (89), (91), (92), and (93); and Co)(1), (3) through (8), (10) through (12), and (14) through (20) shall not be permitted. In addition, the permitted uses identified under Section 9.1 (a) shall also include churches. (2) The development standards for Planning Area 10 of Specific Plan No. 164 shah be the same as those standards identified in Article IX, Section' 9.4 of Ordinance No. 348, except that the development standard set forth in Article IX, Section 9.4(b) shah be deleted and replaced by the following: A. The front yard shall be not less than twenty-five feet (25') and the rear yard shall be not less than twenty feet (20'). The front setback shall be measured form the specific plan street line. The rear setback shall be measured from the existing rear lot line or from any recorded alley or easement; if the rear line adjoins a street, the rear setback requirement shall be the same as required for a front setback. B. There are not side yard requirements, except where the side yard abuts a residentially zoned area, in which case buildings shah be set back twenty-five feet (25') from the side lot line. Each side setback shall be measured from the side lot line, or from the specific plan street line. 5~ords~94-07 ! 1 In addition, the following standards shall also apply: AA. No lot shall have more than fifty percent (50%) of its net area covered by buildings or structures. BB. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be twenty-five feet (25'). CC. The minimum average width of that pertion of a lot to be used as a building site shall be twenty-five feet (25') with a minimum average depth of one hundred feet {100'). (3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as those requirements identified in Article IX of Ordinance No. 348. k. Planning Area 11. (Natural Open Space) (1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 11 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the same as those uses permitted in Article VHIe, Section 8.100 of Ordinance No. 348. In addition, the permitted uses identified under Section 8.100(a) shall also include undeveloped open space and public parks. (2) The development standards for Planning Area 11 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the same as those standards identified in Article VIIle. Section 8.101 of Ordinance No. 348. (3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as those requirements identified in Article VIHe of Ordinance No. 348. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force. and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City. Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full. text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and pest the same in the office of the City Clerk. 5XordsX94-07 12 Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 8th day of Mare. h, 1994. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] . 5~ords\94-07 13 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 94-07 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 22nd day of February, 1994, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 8th day of February, 1994 by the following roll call vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS:. Birdsall, Mufioz, Parks, Stone NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberrs · ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None June S. Greek, City Clerk 5~ords\94--07 14 ITEM NO. 13 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of March 8, 1994 Planni'~~L~ Contiguous Parcel Merger Ordinance PREPARED BY: David W. Hogan, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: It is requested that the City Council: 1. Open the Public Hearing and receive testimony; 2. Close the Public Hearing; and 3. Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 16.7 OF ORDINANCE NO. 460 PERTAINING TO THE MERGER OF CONTIGUOUS PARCELS" BACKGROUND: The current City (County) subdivision standards for merging adjacent parcels creates a process which is inefficient, cumbersome, and inconsistent with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Currently, the City cannot efficiently merge properties which are covered with a single development or are smaller than required by the zoning/development code. The proposed amendment to Ordinance 460 would allow for the efficient merger of contiguous parcels either at the request of the property owner or at the direction of the Director of Planning and meet the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. DISCUSSION: The State Subdivision Map Act sets specific standards for the provisions of merger ordinances. No parcels may be merged unless there is a valid local ordinance which is consistent with the requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act. The provisions for a 'city initiated parcel merger are identical to the merger requirements contained in the Map Act. The only component of the proposed ordinance which is not identical to the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act is the section for a property owner initiated parcel merger. Based upon an evaluation of the requirements of the Map Act, staff determined that the primary reason for the detailed procedures was the need to ensure that the property owner was aware of the City's intent to merge the parcels. R:\STAFFRPT'~!ERGE.CC 3/1/9~ ktb 1 If the property owner has requested the merger, it is safe to assume that the property owner -is aware of the merger. As a result, the merger process has be simplified by removing the special noticing and hearing requirements from the proposed Ordinance. This approach has been approved by the City Attorney. In his opinion, the streamlined merger standards for owner initiated parcel merger is consistent with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. The Planning Commission considered the proposed Ordinance on February 7, 1994. No one offered testimony during the Public Hearing. The Commission then directed staff to further clarify the definition of property owner and ensure that all the owners of the affected property be notified of the proposed merger. The Planning Commission then adopted Resolution 94-04 recommending that the City Council adopt the proposed Ordinance. The proposed Parcel Merger Ordinance will provide standards and requirements concerning the merger of legally created and preexisting contiguous parcels. As a result, adoption of this Ordinance does not have the potential to cause · significant impact on the environment. Therefore, the Director of Planning has determined that the project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY: The proposed Parcel Merger Ordinance will support the General Plan by allowing for the efficient utilization of adjacent or substandard parcels throughout the City. As a result, Staff has determined that the proposed Ordinance is consistent the long-term goals of the City General Plan. FISCAL IMPACT: The adoption and implementation of this Ordinance will not have a significant fiscal impact on the City. Attachments: 2. 3. 4. 5. Ordinance - Page 3 PC Resolution No 94- - Page 10 Staff Report and Commission Minutes - Page 11 Current Parcel Merger Provisions - Page 12 State Standards for Local Merger Ordinances - Page 13 R:\STAFFRPT'%.IIERGE.CC 3/1/~ ktb 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 94__ R:\STAFFRPT'q~ERC~E,CC 3/1/9~.' ktb 3 ORDINANCE NO. 94- AN ORDINANCE OF Ts:FF~ CITY COUNCIL FOR THF~ CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 16.7 OF ORDINANCE NO. 460 PERTAINING TO THF~ MI~GER OF CONTIGUOUS PARCH,8 The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby ordain as fonows: Section 1. Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following findings: A. That the City Council is authox'iz. ed under Section 66451.11 of the Subdivision Map Act ("Map Act"), to adopt a local ordinance regulating the merger of contiguous parcels under common ownership; B. That there are a number of parcels in the City of Temecula which are under common ownership and that do not meet the minimum standards for the zoning district in which they are located; C. That there is a need in the City to provide an appropriate and effective method to merge contiguous parcels to enable the appropriate development of these contiguous parcels; D. That this Ordinance provides for the merger of contiguous parcels and will address this problem; and, E. That this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State hw and local ordinances. Section 2. Section 16.7 of Article XVI of Ordinance No. 460 is hereby mended in full to read as follows: "SECTION 16.7 MPRGER OF CONTIGUOUS PARCP]S. A. PURPOSE. The purpose of this section is to pwvide pmcednres by which the City may require or provide for the merger of two or more contiguous parcels under common ownership. ' This Ordinance has been adopted in COmplinnCe With the provisions of Sections 66451.11 of the Subdivision Map Act and complies with the provisions of Sections 66451.10 through 66451.21 inclusive, of the Subdivision M~p Act, which pwvides the City with authority for the merger of contiguous parcels. B. WHEN PARCELS MAY BE M~GED. The Director of Planning or the owner of any contiguous parcel may initiate the merger of any parcel which meets the requirements of Subsection C. The Director of Phnning, Phnning Commi.sion or City Council may require the owner of any contiguous parcel to request the merger of any or all contiguous parcels within the boundaries of the Old Town Specific Plan in conjunction with the approval of any plot plan or conditional use permit. R:\STAFFRPT\MERGE.CC 3/1/94 ktb 4 C. lVn~Gt~ REQ~. The merger of a parcel with a contiguous parcel(s) may only occur if aH the following requirements are satisfied: 1. If any contiguous parcels are held by the same owner or owners. 2. That at least one of the affected parcels is undeveloped and does not contain a structure for which a building permit was issued or for which a b!~lding permit was not required at the time of construction, or is developed only with an accessory structure or other structure which is sited or partially sited on a contiguous parcel. 3. That one or more of the following conditions applies to the affected parcel: a. At least one of the parcel(s) involved comprises less than S ,000 square feet in area at the time of the determin3tion of merger. b. The parcel was legally created in compliance with all applicable laws and ordinances in effect at the time of its establishment. c. The parcel does not meet slope stability standards. d. The parcel does not meet current standards for sewage disposal and domestic water supply. e. The parcel has. inadequate access or provides for jn_~d_~late maneuverability for motor vehicles or safety equipment. f. The development of the parcel would create health and safety hazards. g. The parcel is inconsistent with the City's General Plan, any approved Specific Plan, or the provisions of the City's zoning and development code. 4. That the parcels when merged will not: a. Be inconsistent or create a conflict with the City Zoning Ordinance or General Plan, or any approved Specific Plan. b. Create a conflict with the location of any existing structures. c. Deprive or restrict another parcel of access. d. Cream new lot lines. D. CITY INITIATED ~GER. 1. Prior to merging any contiguous parcels, the ~ of Planning shall, by Certified Mail to the ~ owner(s) of record at the address shown on the latest available assessment role of the County of Riveaide, mail a Notice of Intent to Merge which notifies the R:\STAFFRPT\NERGE.CC 3/1/W, ktb 5 owner(s) that the affected parcels may be merged pursuant to the provisions of this Section'. The notice shall include the statement that the Owner(s) will be given the ~nity to request a hearing and to present evidence that the proposed contiguous parcel merger does not meet the criteria for a merger. For the purpose of this Ordinance, a property owner is any person holding any portion of the rifle for any involved property. 2. The Notice of Intent to Merge shall be recorded with the Riverside County Recorder on the d_n_t_e that the notice is given to all property owner(s) of record. 3. Within thirty (30) days of the recontafion .of the Notice of Intent to Merge, the owner of the affected propcxty must file a request for a hearing regarding the proposed merger, with the Planning Depamnent. a. If the owner of the affected prope~ does not file a request for a heating within the thirty (30) day time period specified above, the ~ of Planning shall determine whether or not to merge the conliguous parcels. To merge contiguous parcels the Director of Planning shah make the following findings: i. The merged parcel complies with the appwyxiate pwvisions of the Subdivision Map Act and all applicable City Requirements for the merging of contiguous parcels. ii. The merged parcel does not adversely affect the purpose and intent of the City's General Plan or the public health, safety, and welfare. b. If the owner of the affected lxope~ requests a heating on the merger, then Phnning Commition, after a hearing, shall make the determination whether or not the affected parcels are or are not to be merged. 4. The Phnning Department shatl set a time, date, and location for the heating upon receiving a request for a heating from the property owner of the affected property or on the thirty-first day following the recordatiou of the Notice of Intent to Merge. - The hearing shall be conducted within sixty (60) days following the receipt of the owner's request, but may be continued with the mutual consent of the Planning Commi.~sion and the property owner. Notice of the hearing shah be given to the property owner(s) by Certified Mail. 5. At the heating the property owner shah be given the opportunity to present evidence that the affected property does not meet the merger requirements set forth in this Subsection C of this Section. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Planning Commi.~sion shah make a determination to whether the affected parcels are to be merged or not to be merged. To merge contiguous parcels the Planning Commi.~sion shall make the following findings: a. The merged parcel complies with the app~ provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and all applicable City Requirements for the merging of contiguous R:\STAFFRPT~qERGE,CC 311194 ktb 6 b. The merged parcel does not adversely affect the purpose and intentof the City's General Plan or the public health, safety, and welfare. 6. If the Plsnnitlg Commi.~4ion aletea'mines that the subject parcels shall be merged, it shah cause the Notice of Intent to Merge to be recorded as provided for in Section 66451.12 of the Government Code. If notification cannot be made at the time of the hearing to the parcel owner in pcrson, notification shall be lnado by Certified 1V[ail. The Commi.qion Shall notify the owner of its' determination no later than five worirlnE days after the conclusion of the hearing. 7. If the Plsnning Commi.~sion determines that the parcels should not be merged, the Commi.~sion shall insllllct the Diroaor of Plsnnlng to tElease the Notification of Intent to Merge and mail a copy of the release to the property owner. B. PROPBRTY OV~qBR REQ~~ MBRGER. 1. When the owner or owners of record of any contiguous parcel, as defined in Subsection C, requests the merger of two or'more contiguous parcels, application shall be made on the forms and in the manner specified by the Director of Planning. 2. Upon receipt of complete application requesting the merger of any contiguous parcels, a Notice of Intent to Merge shall be recorded with the Riverside County Recorder and a copy shall be sent to the property owner(s). 3. Within thirty (30) days of the recordation of the Notice of Intent to Merge, the Director of Planning shall determine whether the affected parcels are to be merged. To merge contiguous parcels the Director of Planning Shall make the following findings: a. The merged parcel complies with the Subdivision Map Act and all applicable City Requirements parcels. aFpropfiate provisions of the for the merging of contiguous b. The merged parcel does not adversely affect the purpose and intent of the City's General Plan or the public health, safety, and welfare. 4. If the Director of Planning determines that the subject parcels shall be merged, it shah cause the Notice of Merger to be recorded as pwvided for in Section 66451.12 of the Government Code. If notification cannot be made at the time of the hearing to the parcel owner in pen, notification shah be made no later than five working days after the conclusion of the 5. If the Direaor of Planning determines that the parcels should not be merged, the Director of Planning shall release the Notification of Intent to Merge and mail 'a copy of the release to the property owner. R:\STAFFRPT\NERGE.CC 3/1/9~ ktb 7 P. BI:FBCTIV~ DATB OI: MvtRGt~. The merger of any contiguous parcels shall become effective upon recordation of the Notice of Merger with the County Recorder. The Notice of Merger shall specify the date of the Planning Commi~ion's aleremind'on, the names of the recorded owners, and a legal description of the ~es. G. APPEAL OF MBRG~. TIme appeal of the Plmmjn~ CommLqiou's delenninaHon to merge coati~uous parcels to the City Council shall be made in accordan~ with the sppeal provisions conwined in the Muuicipal Code." Section 3. Severability The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this ~ce are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining pa~ of this ordinance. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of thi~ Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinances hall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinan~, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. Section 5. PASSlal, APPROV!a~, AND ADOPTIi]! this 8th day of March, 1994. RON ROBBRTS MAYOR A'ITEST: June S. Greek, City Clerl~ [SEAL] R:\STAFFRPT\NERGE.CC 311/94 ktb 8 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS C1TYOFTBMECULA I, June S. ~, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, Cnllfornia, do hereby certif7 that the fomgoin_g Ontinsnc~ NO. 9 - was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 8th day of March, 1994, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the __ day of , by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCH-MEMBERS COUNCHAiEMBERS COUNCH-MEMBERS IUNES. GI~PI~K CITYCI-mRK R:\STAFFRPT\HERGE.CC 311196 ktb 9 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 9404 R:\$TAFFRPT~IERGE.CC 31119~ klb 10 ATTA~ NO. 1 PC RESO~ON NO. 94- A ms~OLtrrION OF Tm~ PLANNING COMMISSION FOR ~ CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMvNDING THAT ~ CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITL~, AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL FOR Tifi?- crrY OF I'~MECULA AMENDING SECTION 16.7 OF ORDINANCE NO. 460 PERTAINING TO Tgr. -Ms31GER OF CONTIGUOUS PAR(~n R* codified Rivehide County OrdirmnceS, loCi,cling OrdinanCe NO. 460 ('An Ordinance Regulating the Division of i ~nd"); and, WH s'-cs'.4,S, inch zBgula~ms do not camin adequate provisions c:¢mc~nin$ the merger of contiguous parcels; and, WsE~tt&S, That there ate a number of ptr~s in the City of Temecula which are under ~OmmOB ownetBhip add that do not meet the minimnm standards for the ZOning district in which they are located; and, Wus:um'.&S, That there is a need in the City .to provide an a~p,o~,iate and effective method to merge contiguous parcels to enable the app, opx;ate development of these contiguous parcels; and, ~E&S, That the City Coundl is authoaL~by Section 66451.11 ofthe Subdivision Map Act, to adopt a local ordln, nce regulating the merger of contiguous pazcels; and, WHKM~&S, That this Ordinance provides forthe merger of contiguous pa.rcds and will address this problem; and, WHs:gEAS, That this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State hw and local orain~nc~s; and, W~, notice of the pmpos~ Ovtltswe was posted at City Hall, County Li'bmry, Rancho C, Mifcrmia Branch, the U.S. Post Offic~ and the Temecala Valley Chamber of Commerce; and, Wus:atEAS, a public heating were cond,,oted on February 7, 1994, at which time interested persons had an oppommity to testify either in support or ~on. NOW, I'HI~:MWkOR,~ ~ PLANNING COMMte, SION OF Tmr. CITY OF TIMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOT,T OWS: ~SCtiOn 1. That the pinnnhlg Commiuion aftbe C~ of Temecula hereby finds that the proposed Pazce/Mcrgcr Ofdhmn,'c w~l provide for the eStabHthmcm of effective zcgulations to Section 2. That the yinnning COmmLe-SjOD of the City Of Temenda ~ finds that the proposed Parcel Merger Ozxlln~nee will probably be ccmd-.q~ with the OM Town. Specific Plan Section 3. That the pt~rmlng ~ommi~ion af the City of Temecula .further finds that the prolx~sed Pawel Merger Ozdl,m,re is conelmmt with the General p!nn. Seelion 4. That the Planning Commi.~sjon of the City of Temec-lsa finthE finds that the proposed Pazcel Merger Ordinance does not have the potemdnl to oause a significam impacts on Qual~ Act, as ,,mc,~'Jed, punuam to Section 15061 (b) (3). Section 6. PASSED, APPROVEn, AND ADOPTED this 7th day of Febnary, 1994. -SrisvRN J. FORD C:HAIR~ I Hm:l,ncwlr ~TIIFY that the forego~ ReSOhltiOD was duly adopted by the Yhm,dng Commi.~sion of the City of Temecula at a regular meetlug thereof, lmld on the ?th day of Febnmry, 1994 by the following vote of the Commigsion: AYP.5: NOES: ABStn'4T: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: GARY THORNroT I. S1~ARY .:~sr, n,F~m.nMemF_pc~ ~r~m4 km 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AND MINUTES R:\STAFFRPT\HERGE.CC 3/1/96 kLb 11 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Planning Commission Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning February 7, 1994 Contiguous Parcel Merger Ordinance Prepared By: David W. Hogan RECOMMENDATION: ADOPT Resolution No. 94- entitled:' "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY. COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 16.7 OF ORDINANCE NO. 460 PERTAINING TO THE MERGER OF CONTIGUOUS PARCELS" BACKGROUND The purpose of this amendment to Ordinance No. 460 is to address problems with the current parcel merger process which were identified during the approval of the Midnight Roundup. The current City (County) subdivision standards for merging adjacent parcels creates a process which is inefficient, cumbersome, and inconsistent with the provisions of the. Subdivision Map Act. Currently, the City cannot efficiently' merge properties which are covered with a single development or are smaller than required by the zoning/development code. DISCUSSION The State Subdivision Map Act sets specific standards for the provisions of merger ordinances. No parcels may be merged unless there is a valid local ordinance which is consistent with the requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act. Based upon an evaluation of the requirements of the Map Act, staff determined that the primary reason for the detailed procedures was the need to ensure that the property owner was aware of the City's intent to merge the parcels. The provisions for a city initiated parcel merger are virtually identical to the merger requirements contained in the Map Act. The only component of the proposed ordinance which is not identical to the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act is the section for a property owner initiated pe~cel merger. If the property owner has requested the merger, it is safe to assume that the property owner is aware of the merger. As a result, the process can be simplified by removing the special noticing and hearing requirements from the proposed Ordinance. This approach has been approved by the City Attorney. In his opinion, the streamlined merger standards for owner initiated parcel merger is consistent with the requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act. R:%STA~E.PC11/25/94 The proposed Parcel Merger Ordinance would repeal the existing Section 16,7 and replace it with the following: Section A. Section B. Section C. Section D. Section E. Section F. Section G. The purpose of the Ordinance; Describes when parcels may be merged; Provides the requirements which must be met to merge parcels; Establishes procedures for City Initiated parcel merger; Establishes procedures for Property Owner Requested parcel merger; Describes when the parcel merger becomes effective; and, Establishes an appeal process. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed Parcel Merger Ordinance will provide standards and requirements concerning the merger of legally created and. preexisting contiguous parcels. As a result, adoption of this Ordinance does not have the potential to cause a significant impact on the environment. Therefore, the Director of Planning has determined that the project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY The proposed Parcel Merger Ordinance will support the General Plan by allowing for the efficient utilization of adjacent or substandard parcels throughout the City. As a result, Staff has determined that the proposed Ordinance is consistent the long-term goals of the City General Plan. FINDINGS The proposed Parcel Merger Ordinance will provide for the establishment of effective regulations to merge contiguous parcels when needed to ensure efficient land development. The proposed Parcel Merger Ordinance is consistent with the requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act. 3. The proposed Parcel Merger Ordinance is consistent with the General Plan. There is a reasonable probability that the proposed Parcel Merger Ordinance will not interfere with' the future Old Town Specific Ran if it is ultimately determined to be inconsistent with the policies contained in said Plan. Attachments: 2. 3. 4. PC Resolution No. 94- - Blue Page 3 CC Ordinance No. 94- - Blue Page 6 Current Parcel Merger Provisions - Blue Page 13 State Standards for Local Merger Ordinances - Blue Page 14 Ft:%STAFFRFq'VdBr.~LPC11/25/94 Idb 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 CURRENT PARCEL MERGER PROVISIONS (ORDINANCE 460) R:\STAFFRPT'~IERGE.CC 3/1/9~. kl.b 12 :aCTION 16.7. IqERGING OF CONTIGUOUS PARCELS. Notwithstanding the precetlng sections, four or fear contiguous parcels under camnon ownership may be merged without reverting to acreage, praytried that the merger ts approved by the Pllnntng Director and In tnstnnent evidencing such merger ts rlcorded with the County ionMr. Applications to ee~e contiguous parcels shall be made to the Planntng Dtrector on forms provided by the Plannt hlmrtment, and shall be d eccgapltshe by the fee slmmctfied tn Slctalan 17.1 of thts ordinance, and the fol 1 owe ng: An exhtbtt, drawn to scale, delineating tiredsting parcel beund/rtes and the locatton of extstteg structures and erosants. 2. Cop4es of grant deeds for the existtrig parcels. An exhtbtt, drawn to scale, deltneaMng the boundaries of the parcel after the merger, 4. A legal description of the nay parcel as urged. 5. Preliminary tttle report. 6. tit1 tten consent of all owners of record Interest. The Planntng DIrector shall transmit I cmpleted application to the County Surveyor. for review and recamendmtIon end stall grant approval of the request for merger tf: The parcels to be merged are, at the time of merger, under cmmon ownership and written consent Ms been obtatned frga 411 record owners. The larce~ as merged will be consistent with the zontng of the property. The larcel as merged will not con~tct with the location of any extsttng structures on the property. The parcel as merged will not be deprived access as a result of the merger. 5. Access to the adjoining larcels will not be restricted by the merger. No new lot 1tries are created through the merger. The Pl anntng Dt rector shal 1 subrot t to the County Recorder for recordate on the new legal description and exhibit within 20 days after it Ms been approved by the Planntng Director. A'i'I'ACHMENT NO. 5 STATE STANDARDS FOR LOCAL MERGER ORDINANCES (STATE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT) R:\STAFFRPT\NERGE.CC 3/1/~ ktb I alropmtrlimittlmaufimrjtyofaltnlqencywamblviderw~mPeuto ~hefollowingl~or,~sawithin (1) Lat ik~ I (2)~amp~dm~WOtCOfiU:fimlOfafinal0tplR:elnmp' I, (5)Hssn~4s~s:cmswhichissdequsmf~rvehic~srs~dsafetye~i~s~msccessss~msntmve~bi~ity~ · (6) Itsd~.ve. iopmutwouldcxumisslshwssfcsyhsurds- lot si~ s density mndm~ applicable Io ptn:r~ m be mespd. This subdivism shall not spply ff one of the ftilowin~ conditions exist: (A) OnorbefweJuly 1, 1981, cnewmmeofth~comiguous~t~unitsofiandisenfotcublYmminf~ set fwth in Sectim 421 o~lhgRgvtsu~"~d TssafionCodr- (B) On July 1. 1981. cse~'nms=of ltm cmtig.y~,s pmuls er units oflsnd is fimbulmd ss dr/med in subdivism (f) ofSo:fion Sll04, ctis landdevtged toan agfit-,mm,al useas defined in mbdivisim (b) of 51201. (C) OnJuly 1. l~81.on~orma~offi~comi$uomlmu~sonmiuofLmii~kxmmiwill~2,(XX}fmtof ~mmim~nwh~chmn~mmm~ccum.~c.~lmimm.alremmm~emrm:m~umim--~e~-.--~mmd~w~m~mm.~rnm~ extra~ionisbeingmadepursutnttoaus~pennitismmdbYthelo~alaPttT. 19H FkmmlabZamWb and D&utnr (D) Onluly l. 1981. o~ or mote of lM con*ig, melmam~etmimofland i$ kx:ammd within 2.(300 feetof afutmmcmunmt~minmlexm.x" aismmdmmmomaplmftrwhichausepetmitotoiefPmnit c.o,,i~4,.,. imrre__k or mira of !and ~ CalifominCommlAaof1976(Diviam2OoftlmPmbikP,: alandusspim, lmmmadmbyfomalamimofmaC-,.o _:aComm!~purmmtmthspau/,aiom ofthsCalifomiaCommlAaofl976inammmld~!qp~pemitdmcimmorinan mfF o~ullandme plm~lsmlrmormM,,,vvodimmi,~'~" ""~ oa/dmfglmamaofalamimeplmpormm Fa. lmmsesofpa,~,,,.~a(C),ml(D)ofthiswixlivi~m."mimn!~smm'me-,J~ -~"mems~s. oE. hydmK.,mll:k~ Favel, or mad ea "1% Note: Stm. 1984, Ch. 102, sbo fesds: Ugsd0"~pm~ SEC.~.&itblh~inumtofth~vt~i.'-~em~,in~m~wM4~glMfuxt~of~inn6~dSl-llof~ devdopmmund~rthezouingotdmn~ofdmkx:alagm~applka~wanYmtlmuehermimoflmd. ofl983andsla!lthefitmml~cm~ocdammcon,~lpfi,~admmgsikimt. asda?J&amYofPrse'i~nf~- amending Semion66451.19, ofthe GowmunmuCode. mrelie~mmmlim ofthsobliF'km mmafia Pmeml notkeofpomuial~inthatspm:if~no0c~m~mlmimimbegivmPmmmntmSmimmf~451-13 and 66451.19 ofthsGo~,,m,.~Code, am "msnded bY thb m- adopt a ~ottlinan~ whkh complim with 'tlme lxumr~iom~and whkh my tMm merger rr. ordm- of the ~onty in whkh the real ptupmY i$1ocami. anmkeofmetger~g~emmesdthe ~ ownm ~ psrtiodarly desm'bh~g the (Arechad ~ Stars. 1984. C~ 102. ~]ecti~e .April 30. 198~. See no2s folio~ing SS 66~1.10 aed 66451 .]I.) s,,a~ ,,.e ~m. t o.r 6~4SLl3. Priortorecordinganmi~of~,tbelocalammeYshaileamsmbemaBedbYmnifiedmm'lm theowneroftheolmporumitytor~luemtabearingonda,-,,-inationofsmmamimlmmmt~tlmmat~ hearing tim the pmpmy does not meet the czimh for mergsr- The nmi~ of intmtio~ m 'd.~k,'-~ m mhall be fried for nr.4xd with the reaxder of the county in whkh the ml proproy b izated ou ~mda~dm (Amendsl by Stats. 1984, Ck l O2. Effective April' 30.1984. Ste notes foliow~ S~ ~$ l JO aul 6(,4~1.2 2.) Owntr'snquttfor (a4$1.14. Atanydn~within30daysafm'.~c~d~ofd~nmi2ofimmimmde""wi~smm. lk~m hsrkgon of0~tqmmipmpmymayfikwiththeloalqa'Yamlumtfwal2mingmdr-k.--' "' da.... i..-4en of (Amtnded by $tats. 1984. Ch. 102. l~ctive Apra ~0. 1984: sintaw 664~1.I1.) 66481.11Uim~gampmtforalmringmdr~,iami~ofmmfromthsomm'°fdmalimmmd Hm~Wm propettylmmmutoSa:tim66451.14. thelo~alagem~shal!fixadms, dg. mdPlgsforalmmimgmb~ i .,. ,-..~ao! cudu, tcd bymskgimdvelxxiyormadvisutyapm~y, mishanmmifYtbePmlm~.owuerofthatfim~ ~ · 1831': "l, ZemlmSamdD~a%,,, Midram tm: wbic~ v~ u r t- ~d. or lor which me owmr hm Ryplied fer m lmiiding ps~*****~_ during ~ iMiod between January 1. 1986. lnd IM effeglive dl~ d tbis ectim~ (Added I~ F,--. 1986, CL 727. ~ S-gt~ . H. 198S.) 6645L20. Prior lo PN'rd~r mmergero~dinu~which was in_ ** *- n mJmmm7 1, 1984. in otderlo bring jlinm compihnce wilh Secdon66451.ll, tbe~,' .~.c body oflbe Jocmi mlency mbm!l xJoPtm f 30 days pdar m sdmxim d ~ madM ,- " (Added I~ SuuL 1983, Ci~ 84~. See ,me ldb,inl &mien 6~1~0.) (445L21.Prim'loO,eee_13t~ dsmm'germdi,Mar~k, cc, n& --*~wiihSectioa66451.11.by8cityarccxugy mthavingamez~sr og!: -- -~ mJanum'y 1, 1984, 1be~kliskdve ixdy shdl adoPta,.: w~dmion oE immdm mmJolxanefpmfN :emdfixadmemdp/geforaRMicbmri~ou~p,~,;~dadimn~which legisladvebodyskdlcamsanoticedt2bmdngmbeppNaeh,'din~bemamerPmm'b~bYSmim6061. (b)S,-,,.-m~nemdpImedmhmd~ (c) Smsdmat~hmdngdllu~v..w. dlxnmswm~head- (Adde~ I~ Sum. 1983. CIL N~. See ms .[eWewk~ Sectkin 66151JOJ (Secaion d6U12.~ tltmattla (~4~129 rel~ied by Sum. 1984. C~. 102. Effecaive Aprii 30. 1984. following Sacdon ~4~ l J l.) 66OL30. Anypm~.borunitsoflandforwhichsnod2ofmerSerbadnotbemm:mdedmor~~ 1, 1984, shdl bedmmednotmbav~meqed ffm3mu~ 1, 1984: (a)'/klmcelmmseacbor~k~fo/Io--~4crim~ (l)~sikm~5,0OOsqusmhetinm (2) Wss uemed in c,.-.,!~i- ~.c with ~ .... b hws mtd c,,dimnc~ in eff~m dme dme of its cremion. (4) .Mau dope demiry mnakds. (:5) Hu lepl xc~s which is Mequsm for vehicubr md Me~y e,q,.~,/m gcms mdu~ (6)~oflbepmrcelwouldam~nobe~horufetym CT)Thoplrceiwouklbocon~ste~lwilh2PPPlicableFmra]Phnsmim~mPP~K'~bi~~2 (b) And. wizhrespectm sm:b pagel, nm~o~efollowiagco~uig (l) On orbe~omJuly 1, 1981 ,one ormo~of2conligutmpsreelsorunilsoflmlisemfogs~Ys-dl~-2d r. tfwthinSectim421 of~eRevetmeandTamimCode. (2) OuJuly 1. 1981, one or mot~ of ~ cr~r,'-,~psrcels ot units of land is ~d~rlmd Is mbdivisim(f)ofSecdon Sll04. oris hmd devo2d man agdculmml use as dsfined in aobd~a~m(b) d Sec~on 51201. tbesileouwhichmexisdngcou....-~hlmineulmmwceuau ':~" u~isbeingmd~wbelbsrornollb~ (4)On july I. 1981. oue ormm~oEIbe comipoas lmrc~or mits ofbnd is iocsmJ willn2~0fee~oE afummcc, m,.,v.~alminnmlm :':fsimssshownonapimforwhichaumpennitwmlmrlmmi/ mmbmizinf~c~mlmin=~ruom~,~r"~hmsbanimmalbYm=iocmlmBm~. ( 5) W.nhin fim cmsml mam. m ddmM in Seaim ~O l O3 of t~ pultc l~ y v ~ anigums~w uniu disnd Ims, ln~wnJuly 1. lg~l, bmn idm~s.M wd~-~v~-,-d mtminld i~t,,ffiCu,wltli,l=lOluRxxtrrsi~d-,i developme~sm:!wbemlbl~idemificllkmerd~*-~v,'"m;~J~hMejler(A) been inclmkd in ~b~ !md me pim ponim of m iocal comal ProPmn PrePmed md m&~Nl Parmml m ed~ Calll'omi Cmslal Act d1976 (Dividm 20 d lbe Public Resmm:~ Code), or (B) !rkr lo lb~ m~ d a lmd um pim, bem made by forml mkm of lkg ~ Comud Cow~ia~m Pumamt m lbs v'vr~°m oflbe Ca!ffornia Comml Act o~1976 in acoami d~dop,,,ot pemd/~orin m ~k. ,,~.,d imd um plan werkproFam crsnappmvaliuue Mm'-T~ "~ on whichdm pq._ v'D~daimdumplmpmsmm mthopmvhimsoffi~CalifomiaCmsmAaisbamt smndsdsforma.gerspecifsalinSectim66451-11-Atkt~. (Amended 664~l~,l')wilhin the30.daypaiodspedfasd in Seaires 66451.14, thsosnffdom notfilearequutfora ~ in r- dm~ w~h Sa~m 66451.16, ~he ~ agm~ ma~, at an,/A~n~a~.~r~fmsiz a detmninafionlhattho~ims:dssetobemaPloramnonobemerged- ' ' merger ralu~d by Sa:fion 66~1.L5. (Amended I~ $mu. 1984, C.k. 102. Fleeave ~ $0,1984. ~ aow. s.~liowinZ $ecr~n~ ~(~4~1JO and ~shall notbe metged, it shall mms lo b~nnmkdin lhs mmmff'l~'~in'~l in Ssnion664~l-12a ~ele~m~f~henodce~fim~ti~nmth~k""iz~~m.~aza~~dpursuanttoSecti~~6645~~~3~andshal~mail iazr than lanuary 1, 19g6, m:otd anotieeofmetger fotany pan~!mergedltiormJanuarY 1, 1984. Af~e~ January 1, 1986, no par~l merged prior u>lamarY l, 1984, shall be comideml merged mlena notiz of mcrger has L, e~__mmakdlxiztoJammzY l, 1986. (b) Notwitlt~,-,s4i~g the pso,ia~xzs of Sections 664~51.12 to 664~1.1g, inclusive. a city or county having arnergsr~ill~ieeg.~o6Jal~lazy l. 1984,11tly, t~llilJuly 1, 1984, cominue wdfecttbe merger ofpan:elspmsmntto thattmiinm~.umlesstheparcetswouldbedmmednotmhavemaZedPmmmtt°tbe criteriaspeci~edinSecti~6645~.3~.T~calag~ncysh~llre~an~c~dmergerfw~ypm~z~sma~ed pmmmutothatmdinmce. (c) Atleast30dayspriorto~anoticeofmergerPunummsubdivisim(a)°r(b),thel°calagmcY time~d~te~~ndp~~ceatwhich~~~~wnermaypms~evidencem~h~~egisla~iveb~dy~r~dvis~ryag~ncyas psr, eborunits, or m~ of them, umilnr-htb~sssh~lsn:~ormiu°fhndhsvebem~Y~~ (e) Thefaikaeofal~=alagencYtoaxnllYwiththemquirensmu°/anypd°rhwemblishingreq~ forthe merger of ctmtiguous prcels ot units of land held in ~ornmon ownenhip, shall nmd~r voidable any acsims did notcoa~y wilh thelri~law, oracomemersaju~decladng lhat llgsCtims°fthe~ did not comply with ti21tior law, no fUrtlMS'JaOC~Cdh~r undm' tig ptovisioos of this division we local comigutmpam~lsotuniu, otanyoflhem. untilmr. h timeasth~pan~lsotuninoflandha~been lawfully 664SLl~.(a)Coundmmots~an20,000squatsmilesinsizssha!lhamuntiUannarY 1, 1990,mg~mlanoti~ uni~n lhe noti~ofmerger h~been m:tmhsd ltitt mJanua~ I, 1990. Counlim m:mding nmioss of metget (b)ThisseaionstmilnotbeapplimblemanYlmn:dsorunigss~fi~hmmtthsaim~°fmhdi~(a) ~.4s/,' - ITEM NO. 14 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager n~~~,/ Gary Thornhill, Director of Plan April 5, 1994 Ordinance Amending the Land Use Code Regarding the Term of Plot Plans, Conditional Use Permits, and Public Use Permits Prepared By: Debbie Ubnoske RECOMMENDATION: 1. Read by title only and introduce an Ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94-__ "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS,. AND PUBLIC USE PERMITS.' 2. Adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- 'RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF 'AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND PUBLIC USE PERMITS. ' BACKGROUND The Council requested staff to compile a list of applications that would be affected from this change, which resulted in this item being continued from February 22, 1994, March 8, 1994 and April 8, 1994. Attachment 1. Applications Potentially Affected by Ordinance (Chart) - page 2 2. Continued City Council Report dated February 22, 1994- page 3 · :'~T.A~'US~.CC2 3/29/94 vgw 1 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 APPLICATIONS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED BY ORDINANCE MIIMORANDUM FROM: C ty Cmme C ty DATE: Council Requested Information Relative to Five Year Eam~o~ of Time for Plot Plans, Conditional Use Permils, and Public Use Permits Per your request at the City Council Re~rinI, February 7.2, 1994, please find enclosed information relating to City approved proires that could benefit from the Council's adoption of the additional time extension Ordinance, ('m Imlicular, Section 4 relating to the resurrection of expired city approved projects). Should you have any questions, or ff I can be of any s.~sistance, please feel free to contact either me or my raft. at your conveni,~ce. Attachments: 1. Five Year Extensions - page 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 FIVE YEAR I~'r~ONS 11001 11234 11339 11376 11604 11621 11759 11654 11767 4109191 Walsh 3/16/92 220 Unit E.x.p. 3/16/93 Apt/Cond 6/19190 Ikdford 2~ Bpildings 5106191 Coop Auto Exp. 5106193 Service Center 91,216 sq. ft. 6105190 De1 Hotel 2 story 7,992 sq. Rnildings 9118190 Coast Line Equity 93,735 sq. ft. Industrial Park 8/28/90 Koll Company PhaseII 116,368 sq. ft. Business Park 11192 11/30/90 1/01/91 South of'Margafita Road, arproximately 400 feet east' of MomgaRmd and 550 feet north of Rancho California Road. (921-3~0-002,003) Northwest cm'n~ of Rancho Califomia road and Yn~z Road. ((1) buikling built) Tow~~ North side of Rio Nedo. Street., 720 feet southwest of (909-~) West side of Front Street at,p,o~itrmtely 2300 feet south of First Street. Southeast comer of Ranclio Way and Business Park Drive. (921-020-061) North of Winchester Road, west of Ynez Road. (910-200-074) Cimmino 17,352 sq. ft. Industrial Building 108,671 sq. ft. 2.53 acre, warehouse North side of Enterprise Circle south, south of Winchester Road. (909-270-023) 28705 Las l:tnciendi=., (921-050-016) 6 bay self serve car wash 28853 Front Street (922-100-023) Approx. 1,150 sq. ft..51 acres ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CONTINUED CITY COUNCIL REPORT DATED FEBRUARY 22, 1994 R:~ST~t.~n. CC2 3/l~N ~'W 3 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning ~;'p/ February 22, 1994 Ordinance Amending the Land Use Code Regarding the Term of Plot Plans, Conditional Use Permits, end Public Use Permits Prepared By: Debbie Ubnoske RECOMMENDATION: 1. Read by title only and introduce an Ordinance entttled: ORDINANCE NO. "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND PUBLIC USE PERMITS." 2. Adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- 'RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND PUBLIC USE PERMITS. ' BACKGROUND At the April 5, 1993 Planning Commission meeting, staff recommended the Commission amend Ordinance 348 to allow for two additional one year extensions of time for Plot Plans, Conditional Use Permits, end Public Use Permits. At this meeting, the Commission exl~essed a concern relative to extending the life of permits they had never seen and requested staff research the number of Council approved projects which had not expired and bring it beck to the Commission. Staff researched City approvals for the period from April 1990 to June 1990 which was the period of time the City Council acted solely to approve or deny projects. During this period, the City Council acted on eight County transferred plot plans and no conditional use permits or public use permits. Of the eight plot plans acted on, all have either been constructed or have expired. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare an Ordinance providing for two additional years to allow applicants additional time to construct their projects. Commissioner Hoagland was opposed to such an Ordinance. He felt giving applicants an additional two years was not in the City's best interest. At the December 6, 1993 Planning Commission meeting, the Ordinance was presented and approvad by the Commission three to one with Commissioner Hoagland in opposition. Pursuant to prior Council direction, Section 4 of the attached Ordinance allows permittees to request reinstatement of expired City approved applicationS. within six months of the date the Council adopts this Ordinance. The reinstatement hearing will be conducted by the Planning Director. For example, if the City had approved a conditional use permit on the date of incorporation, December 1, 1989, the permit would have expired on November 30, 1991. Under Section 4 of this Ordinance, the Planning Director could grant the permittee up to three one-year extensions of time. The effect of this would be to extend the permit to November 30, 1994. If the conditional use permit had been approved on December 1, 1990 and had expired on November 30, 1992, the Planning Director could now grant two additional extensions in the following years to extend it up to November 30, 1995. Staff will contact all applicants who will be able to avail themselves of these additional time extensions. FISCAL IMPACT Adoption of this Ordinance could result in a positive fiscal impact in that it will provide businesses additional time in which to obtain funding and begin construction of their projects. Attachments: Resolution No. 94-__- Page 3 Ordinance No. 94- - Page 6 Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 11 R:~ST,~,R~rr~d~DUU. CC 2/14~ O, 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 94- RESOLUTION NO. 94- RF, SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING A1X)PTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 1AND US"'E CODE' REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND PUBLIC USE WHB~E/~S, City Ordinance No. 90-04 adopted by reference certain portions of the non- codi~ed Riverside County Ordinances,. including Ordinance No. 348 ('Land Use Code"); and WHEREAS, such regulations provide for extensions of time for plot plans, conditional use permits, and public use permits; and WHEREAS, the City of Temecula wishes to provide for an additional period of time to allow for the development of approved projects; and W!tEREAS, a public hearing was conducted on December 6, 1993, January 7.5, 1994 and February 22, 1994 at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; and WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, County Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOIJOWS: Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds that there are no County cases remaining that would be able to avail themselves of these additional extensions of time. Section 2. That the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds that the pwpos~ Ordinance providing for two additional one year extensions of time will benefit businesses in the City of Temecula. Section 3. That the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds that this Ordinance is exempt through Section 21080 of the California Environmental Quality Act. Seaion 4. That the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby recommends adoption of the proposed additional extension of time Ordinance. The Ordinance is incorporated into this Resolution by this reference. Section S. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this. 22nd day of February, 1994. RONA~ .n ROBERTS MAYOR I HERF. ny CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 22nd day of February, 1994 by the following vote of the Council: AYP. S: NOES: ABSENT: COUNTERS: COUNTERS: COUNCIL~n~,fi~ERS: JUNE S. G~PPK CITYCLERK ATTACHMENT NO. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 94- ORDINANCE NO 94-_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF CONDITIONAL USE PEILMITS, PUBLIC USE PERMITS AND PLOT H.,ANS ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Article XVHI, Section 18.30(0 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348, as adopted by rderence pursuant to City Ordinance No. 90-04, and as amended pursuant to City Ordinance No. 91-09, is hereby amended to read as fonows: 'f. APPROVED PERIOD. The approval of a plot plan shall be valid for a period. of two years from its effective date within which time the construction authorized must be substantially begun or the occupancy authorized be in use; otherwise, the approval shall be void and of no further effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the permittee may, prior to the expiration of the plot plan, apply for up to three (3), one (1) year extensions of time in which to use the plot plan. Each extension of _time shall be granted in one (1) year increments only. An application for an extension of lime shall be made to the Planning Director, on forms provided by the Planning Departnumt and shall be filed with the Planning Department, accompanied by ~ appropriate filing fee. Within thirty (30) days following the filing of an application for an extension of time, the Planning Director may approve, conditionally approve or deny the application. An extension of time may be granted by the Planning Director only upon a determination that the pfoyaty and use are ccm~_qent with the General Plan, Land Use Ordinance, and all other City Ordinances. and regulations. If an extension is granted, the total time allowed for use of the approval shall not exceed a period of five (5) years, calculated from the effective date of the approval. The term *use' shall mean the beginning of a substantial construction of the use that is authm'ized, which construction must thereafter be pursued diligen~y to completion, or the actual occupancy of existin~ buildings or land under terms of the authorized use. The effective date of a plot plan shall be deUn'mined pursuant to Section 18.26 of this Ordinance.* ~:~srAmm~mcc 2n4s4 ,~ 7 Section 2. Article XVIH, Section 18.28(0 of Ordinance No. 348, as adopted by reference pursuant to City Ordinance No. 90-04, is hereby amended to read as follows: "e. -APPROVED PERIOD. The approval of a conditional use permit shah be valid for a period of two years from its effective date within which time the consmactitm authorized must be substanaally. begun or the occupancy authorized be in use; otherwise, the approval shah be void and of no further effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the permittee may, prior to the expiration of the conditional use permit, apply for up to three (3), one (1) year extensions of time in which to use the plot plan. F~,eh extension of time shah be granted in one (1) year increments only. An application for an extension of time shall be made to the Planning Director, on forms puntided by the Planning Department and shall be filed with the P|~mning Department, accompanied by the appropllnte filing fee. Within thirty (30) days foliowing the filing of an application for an extension of time, the Planning Director may approve, conditionally approve or deny the application. An 'extension of time may be granled by the pIx~nnlng Director only upon a determination that the property and use are consistent with the General Plan, Land Use Ordinance, and all other City Ordinances and regulations. If an extension is granted, the total time allowed for use of the approval shall not exceed a period of five (5) years, calculated from the effective date of the approval. The term "use" shall mean the beginning of a substantial construction of the use that is authorized, which construction must thereafter be pursued diligen~y to completion, or the actual ~ of existing buildings or land under terms of the authorized use. The effective date of a conditional use permit shall be determined pursuant to Section 18.26 of this Ordinance." Section 3. Article XVIH, Section 18.29(e) of Ordinance No. 348, as adopted by reference pursuant to City Ordinance No. 90-04, is hereby mended to read as follows: 'e. APPROVED PERIOD. The approval of a public use permit shall be valid for a period of two years from its effective date within which time the construction authorized must be substantially begun or the occupancy authorized be in use; otherwise, the approval shall be void and of no further effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the petmitt~ may, prior to the expiration of the public use permit, apply for up to three (3), one (1) year exUmsions of time in which to use the plot plan. Each extension of time shah be granted in one (1) year increments only. An application for an extension of time shall be made to the Planning ~, on forms provided by the Planning Department and shall be filed with the Planning Department, accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. Within thirty (30) days following the filing Of an application for an extension of time, the Planning Director may approve, conditionally approve or deny the application. An extension of time may be granted by the Planning Director only upon a determination that the prope~y and use are consistent with the General Plan, Land Use Ordinance, and all other City Ordin3nces and l~gUla~OnS. If an extension is granted, the toUd time allowed for use of the approval shall mX exceed. a period of five (5) years, calculated from the effective date of the approval. The term "use" shall mean the beginning of a substantial construction of the use that is authorized, which construction must thereafter be pursued diligcn~y to completion, or the actual occupancy of existing buildings or land under terms of the authorized use. The effective date of a public use permit shall be determined pursuant to Section 18.26 of this Ordinance." Section 4. Notwithstanding the above, any plot plan, conditional use permit or public use permit which the City approved since incoxporation and which has expired, may be reinstated pursuant to the procedure set forth above. In order to zcinstate any such permit, the permittee must make an application to reinstate within 180 days of the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 5. Sevemb'~i~. If any provisions of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any period or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end, the provisions of thi~ Ordinance axe dcc]al~d to be sevemble. Section 6. This Ordinance sh311 be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shah publish a summary Of this Ordinance and a ceriified copy of the full text of tixis Ordinance shall be pesteel in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shah publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and pest the same in the office of the City Clerk. ATTEST: Ronald Roberrs, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] R:XSTAJnmPrU,ANDUSB.CC 2/15~s ~ 9 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY O1~ TEMECULA ) I, June S. GnU, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordlnnnce No. 9~_ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 1994, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted snd passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the__ day of , 1994, by the following roll carl vote: COUNTERS: NOES: COUNt: COUN_c~AIBMBERS: R:WrA~nFnLANDUS~.CC 2ns/~ ~ 10 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT M!gjIORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Gary Thomhill, Director of Planning~'~' December 6, 1993 Ordinance Amending the Land Use Code Regarding the Term of Plot Plans, Conditional Use PermitS., sod Public Use Permits Prepared by: Dabble Ubnoske RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMEND Adopting Resolution 93- adoption of an Ordinance entitJed: recommending "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND PUBUC USE PERMITS." BACKGROUND AT the April 5, 1993 Planning Commission Meeting, staff recommended .that the Commission amend Ordinance 348 to allow for two additional one year extensions of time. Some concerns were expressed by the Commission at the meeting relative to extending the life of projects the Commission had never seen. Staff researched CiW approvals for the period from April 1990 to June 1990 which was the period of time the CiW Council acted solely to approve or deny projects. During this period, the City Council acted on eight County tTansferred plOt plans. No conditional use or public use permits were acted on. Of the eight plot plans acted on, all have either been constructed or have expired. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission Meeting, the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare an Ordinance providing for two additional yeare to allow applicants additional time to construct their projects. Commissioner Hoegland was opposed to such an Ordinance. He felt giving applicarrr~ an additional two yeare was not in the City's best interests. DISCUSSION It is staff's opinion that the five year approval process would benefit businesses by providing them additional time in which to omain funding and begin construction, It is further staff's opinion that there are no cases remaining from the County which would be able tO avai!. themselves of this additional time, Section 4 of me attached Ordinance allows permittees to reaues~ reinstatement of expired City approved applications within six months of me date the Council adopts this Ordinance. The reinstatement hearing will be conducted by the Planning Director. For example, if The City had aDproved a conditional use permit on the date of incorporation, December 1, 1989, the permit would have expired on November 30, 1991. Under Section 4 of this Ordinance, the Planning Director could gram the permittee up to three one-year extensions .of Time. The effect of this would be to extend the permit to November 30, 1994. If the conditional use permit had been approved on December 1, 1990 and had expired on November 30, 1992, the Planning Director could now gram one extension at this time to extend the permit to November 30, 1993, and then gram two additional extensions in the following--years to extend it up to November 30, 1995. ... ENVIRONMENTAL DEiIRMINATION Adoption of this Ordinance is exempt throUgh Section 21080 of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act. Attachments Resolution No. 93~- Blue Page 3 Ordinance No. 93- - Blue Page 6 Idle ATTACHMENT NO. '1 RESOLUTION NO. 93- R:~T PC 11/21/13 Idle 3 RESOLUTION NO. ~ I~ROLUTION OF THE PIANNING CO1VIMISSION OF ~ ~ OF TINECIXA RECO~ING ~ crrY COUNCIL ADOPT. AN ORDINANCE AMENDiNG Tnx LAND USE CODE REGARDING TnT. TERM OF FLOT PLANS, CONDmONAL USE FERMrrS, AND PLrSLXC USE ~~.4S, a public heazing was ¢o-~ct~ on D~cemb~r 6, .1993, at which intcres'tr. zl persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; and wn-n~u~, notice of the F, OpOsedt Oraln--ce was posted at City Fr=n, County Library, ./--lancho C~lifomia Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of ~mmerC. c; and NOW, ~K'~ORE, ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF TnT. CITY OF TEVIECULA DOES RESOLVE, DE'rERMIN~ AND ORDER AS FOI-I-OWS: Seaion 1. That the Planning Commission of the City of Ternec-}~ hereby fuels thai at= no County cases l~mninlng thai wouAd be able to avail themselves of these additional extensions of rime. Seaion 2. That the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula here~ finds that the proposed Ordinance pwvHi-g for two additional one year ~-sions of time will benefit businesses in the City of Temecula. Section 3. Tha~ the Planning Commission of the City of Temecuh hex~y finds flit Ordinance is exempt through Seaion 21080 of the C~,llfornia E. mrizonmrn-1 Q.,dlty Act Seaion 4. That the Planning Cm-mi.~sion of the City of Temecula ~ recommends to the City Council adoption of the proposed additional ertl~o~ of lime Onti-=-c~. The Ordhl3/tCC is izlcorJ)oraEed into thi_~ Rcsolufion by thi,~ rdezen~ and marked Exhibit "A" and datexi December 6, 1993, for iden~on. . . ./~--- R:II, S'rA .... I~: 11r~/93 idle 4 Seaion 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6tb day of December, 1993. ~ F. FORD _r'~a. IRMAN AYES: NOF.,S: 'ABSENT: PLANNING COlV~SIONIEI~: PLANNING COlVfiVD~SION]EP-S: PLANNING CO1VIMISSION]t~: SECRETLY ATTACHMENT NO. 2 ORDINANCE NO. R:NSliTA,.,.,'~:'T%LAIINILleC 11~9/13 idle ORDINANC~ NO 93-_ AN ORDINANCE OF TKE CITY COUNCIL OF Tm~. ClTY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TEE LAND USE CODE P, EGARDING TRY, TERM OF CONDITIONAL USE TKE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ ~ OF T~viECULA DOES n'k-n~ay ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Azlicle X'VIII, Section 18.30(t') of Riversid~ County Ovi;-,,,,ce No. 348, as adopted by refm'en~ pm'suant w C.:a'y Oralr.,r,,-e No. 90-04, and as ,,mrpded pursuam to City Ox~ir,~n~e No. 91-09, is lm-.by ?m,m,~,~ to zmd as follows: 'f. APPROVED FKRIOD. The appwval of a plot plan shall be valid for a period of two yean from ~ gffective daze w~h~ which time the consuuaion aurtn4zcd mu~ be subs~m~=ny begun or the occupancy antb~ be in use; otherwise, the approv~ ,h~n be void and of no furor effect. NOtwith.~r=rHinE the foregoing, the l,c,...;-~c may, prior w the expizadon of the plot plan, apply for.up w ttn~ f3), one (1) year e~r, msions of time in which w use the plot plan. Each err~n~cm of dine shall be gran~ in one (I) year incr~mems only. An applicazion for an cxumsion of ~me shall be made w the Planning Director, on forms pwvidr. d by the .p!=.~r~ Depanmenn and sbaI1 be filed with the plnn,ing Deparune~ accoml~ded by the al~yxop~qze filing fee. Within thiz~ (30) days foBowing the fi/ing of an atupBca~on for an gngnsion of ~ime, the planning Dizeaor my approve, condidomlly alcove or deny the application. · An extension of time my be granted by the p!~nflng Dizeclxn' only upon a determination that the ytopc~y and use are coe-~i~.er~ with the General Plan, I~nd Use Oralinane=, and all other City Orrlin=nces and re~m,i=tirms. If an extension is granted, the toutl time allowed for use of the atoproyal shall not e. xccgd a pcziod of five (5) years, ~ind=,-d fxom the dfcctive date of the approval. The u=m "use" sba/1 mean fiae b¢~;.,d;.~ of a sub~ua~ consm~aion of ~e ~ ~ h n~, w~ c~z m~ ~~ ~ ~ dm~y w w S~ 18.26 d ~ ~i,,,~.' Seaion 2. Article XVIII, Seaion 18.28(f) of Ord~s,,ce No. 348, as adopted by r~ference pursuan~ to City Or~h,,mce No. ~)-04, is tzreby amended zo read as follows: "e. APPROVED PERIOD. The ~pwval of a wnditio~ use permit shall be valid for a period of two yentts ~ its effeaive date wirhi~ which time the consm~aion sutlzzizzd must be ;,b.~.~.d;,ny begun or'tbe c~:cul~-~y. suthozized be in use; otherwise, tiz zpptoval ~hnrl be void and of no further effect. ~ al:rplicsXion fcyr an e~sicm d time sixall be ,v,,.~_ to ~ l~.ndnE Dix~, on fonns ~ by ~ Pi~-,,+,,.- Depsmnent and shall be filect with the p},,v,nlng Dq:m~mexX, acco..,s~ied by the .+,+,,.,+,,2ar~ fnh, g fee. Within thirty ('30) days following tlz f;lin,; of an application for an e:n=nsion d time, the plnrmln~ ~ may ~, conditionally q:qn'ove or deny the application. An enension of tlmc may be s,-.nt/~ by the Planning Director only upon a detemination that the p, oi/-,,Y and use are consistent with the General Plan, Land Use Ordln.nce, and all other C..ky Ordin-nCeS and zegulati~. If an cxc~d a period of five (5) y~trs, calcuhted from the effective date of the approval. The term "use" Sh.n mean the bet, inning of a substantial construction of the use thsz is authorized, which construction must thereafter be pursued dfligen~y to completion, or the actual ocatpancy of e.,d-elng buildings or land under terms of th~ authorized use. The effective date of a conditional use permit sb.n be demrmined pureant to Seaion 18.26 of ~i, Ordinance." Seaion3. Article XVIII, Section 18.29(e) of Ordinanc~ No. 348, as adopted by r~f=r~ncc puz~uant to City orr"n.n-e No. 90-04, is hereby mended to read as follows: "e. APFROViD PKP, IOD. The approval of'a public use permit sb-n be valid for a period of two years from in effeclivc daze widdn which lime the consh-uclion autho~ed must be subsmvH=ny begun or the occupancy authorized be in use; othcrwisc, the approval sh~n be void and of no further effea. N0twirhS~ndlng the foxt~in~, the pc~u~r~ may, pd~ w ~ ~on of ~ pub~ ~ ~, ~ly for ~ w ~ ~), = (1) y~ ~ d ~e ~ w~ch w ~ ~ p~ p]~". ~ ~ of ~e s~n ~ ~ h ~ (1) y~ ~en5 o~y. R:%$~STA~ 11/29/93 IdlB 8 (30) days following the ~l:mg of an app.,--rlo,, for an extg~on of mc, thc E: ,m~,E ~ my gppmvc, condifiom.Dy at]prove or dgny the applit:ation. An extension of dine may be _ormnt~ by'the pi-nn;ng Dizlg:mr oDly upon* a detezmin~rrlon that the p~opc~y and use az~ con*gi-grrnr with the Genera.1 Plan, T ned USe OrriirmnC~, a/IC[ ex-r~sicm is granted, the total ri,,,c alloweel for use'of the approval sha.U not exceed a period. of five (~ yean, c~k~nn~.t from tt~ effective date of the The tenn 'use" 'shall mean the beEimdng of a v,br~,nd.~ construction c~f the use that is autbozized, which consgrug/ion must thuu. Et~ be pursued dfi~ge:ntly to CODZp]Lefi05, O~ tile acDlaJ OCCtXID~nCY Of e~-i-,.'ing ~riidlnp Or ]lzzd uDc~r ~ of t. bc aUtzo~z~ use. Tb~ effec~ve dalg of a public use permi~ _,h,n be der.=mi-ed pursuant m Section 18.26 of ,hi.~ OV'iin,n~." Section 4. NOtwirh-randlng the above, any plot plan, conditional use permit or public use p~nit which the City appmved since inco,po,d/jon and which has expire, may be reinstated pursuant to the procedure set fcr~ above. In order to rrlnsr~te any such permit, the permince must makg an application to l~i,~-r~re, ~ 180 days of the effective date of Ord~.~ce. Seaion 5. Sever-hfiiU. If any provisiom of thi~ C)ZHh~rre or the app]icazion therr. of to any period or cizD,m-e~-c~ is hfJd invalid, such invalidity stroll not affea other provisions or applications, and to this end, the provisions of thi.~ ~ce az~ cieclar~ to be et:,,~.~I'AF;IIPT,d. Alqa:NJIE. PC 11r~la 9 ~une S. Gx~k, Ci~ Clerk [SSAL] STATE OF C.a ~ -T=ORNIA ) COUNTY OF RlVSBS)DI~ ) c1~ OFT~SCTjI~ ) I, June S. 0zeek, City Cleric of the City of ~-r~Fta, said Ord~---ee was du~ sdoped and passed at a reSu~ ,~ee,~ d the C~ Council of the City of Temecuh on the __ day of ,1993, by the following roll call vote: COUHCT'r MEMBERS: NOES: COUNTERS: COI.TNGI.,.MEMBEILS: ,:ms.r,L, wwwjNo~s,c ,/=ss3 ,.,,. 10 ITEM NO. 15 APPROV/~ T, CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer DATE: March 8, 1994 SUBJECT: Inducement Resolution/TEFRA Hearing RECOMMENDATION: Read by title only and introduce an Ordinance entitled Ordinance No. 94- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE NEED FOR AN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, AND DECLARING THAT SUCH AUTHORITY SHALL FUNCTION WITHIN THE CITY Adopt a resolution entitled Resolution No. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ON BEHALF OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, · ACCEPTING THE APPLICATION OF TENSION ENVELOPE CORPORATION DISCUSSION: The City has been approached by Tension Envelope Corporation to issue Industrial Development Bonds to finance their new facility in Temecula. In order to do so City Council must adopt the attached Resolution No. 94- and Ordinance No. 94- to activate an Industrial Development Authority and accept an application from the company. Attachments: Resolution No. 94- Ordinance No. 94- ORDINANCE NO., 94-_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL 0F THE CITY OF TEMECIIA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE NI;IEB FOR AN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, AND DECLARING THAT SUCH AUTHORITY SHALL FUNCTION ~ THE CITY The City Council of the City of Temecula, California (the "City"), does ordain as follows: Section 1. Findingg. 1.1 Them exists within the City of Temecula economically distressed areas which may be bene~ted by efforts to prevent the loss of erAsting jobs and to create new jobs. 1.2 The health, welfare and safety of the people of the City make it necessary to provide an alternative method of financing certain facilities in order to prevent the loss of existing jobs within the City, and increase employment opportunities, and otherwise contribute to the economic development of the City. 1.3 The California Industrial Development Financing Act, California Government Code Sections 91500 and following ("the Act"), has created within the City a public, corporate instrumentality of the State of California, known as the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Temecula ("the Authority"), to exercise such powers and accomplish such purposes as may be granted an set forth in the Act. 1.4 Section 91520 of the Act provides that the Authority shall not transact any business or exercise any powers under the Act unless, by Ordinance, the City Council declares that there is a need for the Authority and that the Authority shah function. Section 2. Declaration of Need for Authority. 2.1 The City Council hereby finds and declares, within the meaning of Section 91520 of the Act, that there is within the City a need for an industrial development authority. 2.2 The City Council hereby further finds and declares that the Authority shah function within the City. 2.3 The Authority is hereby empowered to transact business and to exercise all powers as permitted by law. Section 3. Referendum. 5\ords~authority I 3.1 Pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section 91520 of the Act, this Ordinance is subject to the provisions for referendum set forth in Article 2, commencing with Section 4050, of Chapter 3 of Division 5 of the California Election Code. Section 4. Notice of Ad~otion. 4.1 Within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall certify to such adoption and cause copies hereof, so certified, to be posted in at least three public places within the City. 4.2 Promptly after the adoption of this Oniinance, the City Clerk shall certify to such adoption and cause a copy hereof, so certified, to be sent to the California Industrial Development Financing Advisory Commission, together with a list of the members of the Board of Directors, the Officers, the executive employees of the Authority, and the name, address and phone number of the Executive Director of the Authority as being the person to be contacted concerning business of the Authority. Section $. gffective Date. 5.1 This Ordinance shah be in full force and effect 30 days after its passagc. The City Clerk shall certify to thc adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinanace. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with thc names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this day of March, 1994. A~T: Ron Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] 5~ords~smhority 2 STATE OP CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I, June Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Ordinance No. 94--- had its first reading on March __, 19_, and had its second' reading on March _, 1994, and was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula, at a regular meeting of said Council, thereof held on the __ day of March, 1994, by the following roll call vote: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABS~: COUNCILMEMBERS June S. Greek, City Clerk 5~ords~amhority 3 RESOLUTION NO. 94-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ON BEHALF OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVF~LO PMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TI~IECULA, ACCEFrING THE APPLICATION OF TENSION ENVELO~ CORPORATION WHEREAS, the City of Temecula (the "City") is in the process of activating the Industrial .Development Authority of the City of Temecula (the "Authority") and proposes to appoint the City Council of the City to act as the Board of Directors of the Authority; and WHEREAS, Tension Envelope Corporation, a Delaware corporation (hereinafter the "Company') has submitted its application (hereinafter the *Application*) for the issuance of bonds to finance a proposed project (hcreinafter the *Project*) as described therein; and WHEREAS, said Project involves the acquisition of a parcel of land and the existing building thereon in Temecula, the renovation and rehabilitation thereof and the acquisition and installation therein of machinery and equipment; and WHEREAS, the City, on behalf of the Authority, wishes to secure for the people of the City the public benefits which will accrue as a result of financing the Project; and .WHEREAS, the Staff of the City, on behalf of the Authority, has reviewed said Application and has prepared its report with regard thereto; NOW TI4EREFORE, THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ON BEHALF OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMF, CULA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, FIND AND DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Application of the Company for financing pursuant to the California Industrial Development Financing Act, which commences at Section 91500 of the Government Code of the State of California (hereinafter the *Act*), is hereby accepted. Section 2. The City, on behalf of the Authority, hereby finds and determines with respect to said Application as follows: A. It is likely that the undertaking of the Project will be a substantial factor in the accrual of the employment benefits for the residents of the City which will result from the use of the facilities, all as proposed in the Application. These public benefits will substantially exceed any public detriment from the issuance of bonds in the maximum 5~z~sos~,t~nsion I principal amount proposed in the Application. B. The financing of the Project and the resultant operation of the Project will generate employment benefits for the community by increasing the number of persons employed within the City. The Company estimates initial employment of approximately 125 employees. Moreover, the Company estimates that its sales will increase over their current level upon completion of the Project. C. The use of the facilities to be financed pursuant to the Application qualifies under Government Code Section 915003 (a) (1) as an industrial use for the manufacture of envelopes. D. The Project, as proposed in the Application, is in accord with the purposes and requirements of the Act in that the Project will enhance and promote economic development and increase opportunities for useful employment, all as set forth in the Application. Section 3. The City, on behalf of the Authority, hereby declares its present intention to cause 'the Authority to issue tax-exempt bonds on behalf of the Company to finance the Project in a principal amount in no event to exceed $6,S00,000 and for the purpose described in the Application. Section 4. The bonds shall be issued in ~ce with the Act, and shall be secured by the Project, together with any additional security necessary to insme the marketability of the bonds issued. Section 5. In no event shall the bonds constitute a pledge of the faith and credit of the City, the State of California, or any political subdivision of the State, and the City shall not be liable to make any appropriations for repayment of the bonds. The bonds shall constitute a special obligation of the Authority payable solely from the revenues or other sources provided for in a loan agreement and p~ings to be provided for hereafter. Section 6. Acceptance of the Application in no way obligates the City or the Authority to undertake the financing of the Project. Section 7. It is the purpose and intent of the City, on behalf of the Authority, that this resolution constitute official action toward the issuance of obligations by the Authority for the Project in accordance with the regulations and rulings promulgated by the Unites States Department of the Treasury under Section 103 of the internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Section 8. In accordance with Section 91530(0 of the Act, the officers of the Authority, when activated, are hereby authorized and directed to cause the Application to be submitted to the City Council of the City for approval of the Project. 5~r~soe\lension 2 Section 9. A copy of the Application shall be filed with the City Clerk of the City. Concurren~y, a notice of the acceptance of the application and the filing with the City shall be published in a new~ of general circulation in the City pursuant to Section 91530 (e) of the Act. Such notice shall name the Company, state the estimated maximum bond issue, and briefly summarize the Project and refer to the Application for further particulars. Section 10. In accordance with Section 91531 (a) of the Act, the officers of the Authority, when activated, are hereby authorized and directed to request that the California Industrial Development Financing Advisory Commission (bereinaf~ the "Commission") make the determinations authorized by Section 91531 of the Act. In furtherance of the · request, the officers of the Authority, when activated, are hereby authorized and directed to cause the Application, the fee of the Commission (but solely from funds supplied by the Company) and other information required by the Commission for its purposes to be forwarded to the Commission. Section 11. In accordance with Section 91533 (1) of the Act, the Company shall be required to pay atl workers employed in the construction of the manufacturing facility a wage that is not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for ward of a similar character in the locality in which the work is performed and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. PASS~r}, APPROVI~J~, AND ADOFrED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula this _ day of March, 1994. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk 5~e, sos~t~nsion 3 ITEM 16 APPROVAL CITY OF TEMECULA MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: March 8, 1994 City Council Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager Z~' Allocation of Funds for Continued Concept Study of Old Town Entertainment Center RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an amendment to the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Temecula, the Redevelopment Agency and T.Z.B.G., Inc. (Zev Buffman) and allocating ~ 125,000 from the Redevelopment Agency for use in researching the feasibility of a private/public partnership. BACKGROUND: On October 12, 1993, the City, Redevelopmerit Agency and Mr. Buffman entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to negotiate a public/private partnership for the development of specific entertainment venues in the Old Town Temecula area. Pursuant to the MOU, Mr. Buffman and City staff have engaged in discussions about the establishment of a project in the Old Town. At the February 28, 1994, joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting, Mr. Buffman made a presentation to provide an update on the progress made during the first six months of the MOU. Mr. Buffman proposed that the City and he enter into an agreement to share the cost for further research and feasibility studies on the project. An amendmentto the MOU would provide the language necessary to describe the cost-sharing agreement for the research and feasibility studies. FISCAL IMPACT: Mr. Buffman has proposed that the costs for further research and feasibility studies be split equally between the Agency and himself. It is further proposed that the combined cost of the studies would not exceed $250,000. The Agency's share of that amount is not to exceed $125,000. Because the project, if constructed, will ultimately result in public facility and infrastructure improvements in a redevelopment area it is recommended that $125,000 be appropriated from the Redevelopment Agency's fund balance. Attachments: (1) Amendment to MOU (to be provided at the Council meeting). ITEM 17 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT' ITEM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAl CITY ATTORNEY ~_ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Community Services Board of Directors Ronald E. Bradley· General Manager March 8, 1994 Award of Construction Contract for Sports Park Slope Repairs Project No. pw93-O6CSD PREPARED BY: hawnD Nelson Diirector of Commumty Services on Spa;nolo Pr;nc pal Engineer Cap:tal Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Award a contract forthe Sports Park Slope Repairs, Project PW93-06CSD, to American Contracting, Inc. for $223,445.00, and authorize the President to execute the contract and; Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $22,344.50, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. 3. Appropriate $246,000.00to account No. 210-166-648-5804. e Authorize a transfer of 8246,000.00 from T.C.S.D. fund balance to the Capital Projects-Disaster Relief fund. BACKGROUND: During the storms of January 1993, the Sports Park suffered damage to the slope below Margarita Road and to the trapezoidal earthen channel meandering through the park. On January 11,1994 the Board of Directors approved the plans and specifications for the Sports Park Slope Repairs, Project No. PW93-06CSD, and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public bids for construction. The bids were publicly opened on February 24, 1994. The project includes the excavation and reconstruction of the damaged portion of the slope below Margarita Road, the irrigation and landscaping of the reconstructed slope, and the excavation and reconstruction of portions of the earthen trapezoidal channel. The engineer's estimate for this project is $308,109. -1- pw13~agdept~i4103OB~pwS3-O6.ewd 0228 Sixteen bids were received for the project and the results are as follows: 1. American Contracting, Inc ..................... 'e223,445.00. 4. 5. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. C.E. Wilson Corporation ...................... e227,865.05. Kemmis Equipment, Inc ....................... ~289,912.85. Larson Construction ......................... ~290,326.30.. Dave Otteson Co ............................ 8297,370.00. L.D. Anderson, Inc .......................... $302,241.00. Cunninghem-Davis Corp ...................... 8304,255.90. Civil Works Corp ........................... e314,262.60. Jim Hubbs Construction ...................... $319,964.00. Commercial Contractors, Inc ................... $322,125.00. Gillespie Construction, Inc ..................... ~326,731.00. Los Angelel Engineering, Inc .................... $332,238.00. One Tractor Doze It All ....................... $354,612.00. Kruger McGrew Construction Co ................ $382,839.00. Soil Engineering Const., inc .................... '$447,655.00. Ryco Construction, Inc ....................... $589,565.00. American Contracting, Inc. has performed work similar in scope to the Sports Park Slope Repairs, PW93-06CSD, for other agencies and builders within Riverside County. Based on comments we have received from the references listed in the bid documents, the work completed by American Contracting, Inc. has been acceptable. The construction schedule is for 45 working days. Work is expected to begin in early April, 1994 and be completed by the end of May, 1994. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. -2- pw13~egdrpt'~4%O308~ow93-O6.ewd 0228 FISCAL IMPACT: The project is being funded through Fund Balance in the TCSD - Community Services, Parks, and Recreation budget. The slope repair and channel improvement portions of the project are eligible for reimbursement from the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA). The original reimbursement estimate prepared by FEMA in conjunction with the City is e6,513 for the slope repair and ~46,132 for the channel improvements. The total project amount is ~245,789.50,which includes the contract amount of ~223,445.00plus the 10% contingency of $22,344.50. 4- pw13%agdm694~O308%pw93..O6.ewd 0228 CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR IViO.,ECT NO. PIN93.06 THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 8ffi day of March. 1994, by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and A...alc-q Contracting, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: 1,8. CONTRACT DOCUMFNTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECTNO. PW93-06, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications,. and the latest version of the Standard~ Soecifications for Public Works Construction. including all supplements as written an, promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW93-06. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building News, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, Califomia 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for Project No. PW93-06. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Document describes portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. CONTRACT CA-1 pwOS~jp~prejeete~pwS3-O6~dpkg. The Contract Documents am complementary, and whet is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by ell, Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shell be resolved in favor of this Contract, .~nOPF OF WnRK, CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shaft. provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all *. utility and transportation services required for the following: All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY. CITY ApPRnVA~. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives. CONTRACT AMOUNT ANn RCH;nUI F. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: TWO HUNDRED TWENTY THREE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED FOURTY FIVE DOLLARS and NO CENTS ($223,445.00),the total amount of the base bid. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed forty-rave (45) working days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY, Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY, CHANGE ORnFRS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. PAYMENTS. On or about the thirtieth (30th)-day of the month next following the commencement of the work, there shall be paid to the CONTRACTOR a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed since the commencement of the work. Thereafter, on or. about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid such sum as will bring the peymente each month up to ninety percent (90%) of the previous payments, provided that the CONTRACTOR submits his request for payment prior to the last day of each preceding month. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any pert thereof unsncumbered, shell be made sixty (60) days after CITY acceptance of the work and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year warranty with the CITY on a warranty form provided by the CITY. Payments shell be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount etated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments ~on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. CONTRACT CA-2 p~erojem%pwgl-06tiikg. WARRANTY RFTFNTInN. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded ~ the CITY shell retain e portion of the Contract award price, to euure warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule: CONTRACT AMOUNT 825,000- 875,000 875,000- 8500,000 Over 8500,000 RFTFNTION PFRIOn 180 days 180 days One Year RFTENTInN PFRCI:NTAGt= 3%. 82,250 + 2% of amount in excess of 875,000 810,750 + 1% of amount in excess of 8500,000 10. LInUIDATFD DAMARES: FXTFNSION OF TIMF. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One Thousand Dollars (81,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shell be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay. -~ WAIVER OF CLAIMS. Unless a shorter time is specified elsewhere in this Contract, on or before making final request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shell submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation under or arising out of this Contract; the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of the final payment shall constitute a waiver of all claims against CITY under or arising out of this Contract except those previously made in writing and request for payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnify agreement with each claim for payment. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file.with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shell forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of 825.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. CONTRACT CA4 pwOb'~dp~preieotelpwe3-O6~ldpkg. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. TIMF OF THF FSRFN~F. Time is of the essence in this Contract. INDFMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of parsons (CONTRACTOR'semployees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations harein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. CRATUITIFS. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has .offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. CONFLICT OF INTFR;ST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that ha is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other puerparel of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. CONTRAnTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shell file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. RESOLUTION OF CI-~,IMS. Any dispute or claim arising out of this Contract shell be arbitrated pursuant to Section 10240 of the California Public Contracts COde. NOTICE TO CITY OF I AROR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. BOOKS AND RECORpS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. INSPFCTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and ell other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shell be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. CONTRACT CA-4 pwOSX~p~g~%pwe3-OSXbapke. 20. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agree~ that it will no' "~ discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 21. ROVFRNINn I AW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by. the law of the State of California. 22. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Tamecula, CA 92590-3606 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR By: Print or type NAME Print or type TITLE DATED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF TEMECULA By: Ron Robarts, Mayor Scott F. Field, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk CONTRACT CA-S pwO~dp~pr~itet.',pws3-O~. ITEM NO. 2 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 APPROVAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: March 8, 1994 Agency Chairman and Board Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director Approval of Funding MechaniSm for Special Studies- Old Town Temecula Project RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency Board approve: (1) An amendment to the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Temecula, the Redevelopment Agency and T.Z.B.G., Inc. (Zev Buffman); and (2) An appropriation of ~125,000 from the Redevelopment Agency fund balance to Account # 280-199-999-5248for use in researching the feasibility of a private/public partnership. BACKGROUND: On October 12, 1993, the City, Redevelopment Agency and Mr. Buffman entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to negotiate a public/private partnership for the development of specific entertainment venues in the Old Town Temecula area. Pursuant to the MOU, Mr. Buffman and City staff have engaged in discussions about the establishment of a project in the Old Town. At the February 28, 1994, joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting, Mr. Buffman made a presentation to provide an update on the progress made during the first six months of the MOU. Mr. Buffman proposed that the City/Agency and he enter into an agreement to share the cost for further research and feasibility studies on the project. An amendment to the MOU would provide the language necessary to describe the cost-sharing agreement for the research and feasibility studies. FISCAL IMPACT: Mr. Buffman has proposed that the costs for further research and feasibility studies be split equally between the Agency and himself. It is further proposed that the combined cost of the studies would not exceed $250,000. The Agency's share of that amount is not to exceed $125,000. Because the project, if constructed, will ultimately result in public facility and infrastructure improvements in a redevelopment area it is recommended that $125,000be appropriated from the Redevelopment Agency's fund balance. Attachments: (1) Amendment to MOU (to be provided at the Council meeting).