HomeMy WebLinkAbout032994 CC/Murrieta Jnt. AgendaAGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A SPECIAL JOINT MEETING WITH THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MURRIETA
COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER, 30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD
MARCH 29, 1994- 7:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER:
Flag Salute
Mayor Ron Roberts, City of Temecula
Mayor Jack VanHaaster, City of Murrieta
ROLL CALL:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Muf~oz, Parks, Stone, Roberrs
Allen, Geisse, Smith, Walsh,
VanHaaster
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are
limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item
not listed on the Agenda or on the consent Calendar, a pink "Request To Speak" form
should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all other agenda items a 'Request To Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Council gets to that item. There is s five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at
this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
Agende/032894 I 03123/94
COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. Presentation on Murrieta-Temecula Labor Force Studv
Verbal Presentation by
Associates.
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Receive and File
David Wilcox, Sr. Vice President, Economic Research
Watershed Plannino
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
2.2
Direct staff to participate in the effort to develop a watershed
management plan for the Santa Margarita River.
Direct staff to revise a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for
development of a Santa Margarita River Watershed Management
Program and return the MOU for approval at a future meeting.
CITY MANAGERS REPORTS
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting: April 5, 1994, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho
Vista Road, Temecula, California.
Next meeting: April 7, 1994, Joint City Council/Planning Commission Meeting, 7:00
PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
AeendNO32ee4 2 03123/94
ITEM
NO.
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Councils of City of Temecula and City of Murrieta
City Manager Ronald E. Bradley
June 8, 1993
Murrieta-Temecula Labor Force Study
June Greek, City Clerk
Receive and File Report
BACKGROUND: David Wilcox, Senior Vice President of Economic Research Associates
will present an oral report. A copy of the Labor Force Study will be forwarded to the Council
members under separate cover.
JSG
R:%agende,rpt%OES-.Reee 1
ITEM NO.
2
CITIES OF MURRIY~TA AND TEMECUIA
CITY COUNCIL R~PORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SURIECT:
MARCH 29, 1994
HONORABLE MAYORS AND CITY COUNCILS
MURI~TA & ~ PLANNING DEPARTMY~NTS
WATERSHY-r} PLANNING
RECOMM~NDATION
It is recommended that the City Councils of Murrieta and Temecula join the Santa Margarita
River Watershed Management Program (Planning Group). It is further recommended that the
City Councils direct staff to bring back a revised Memorandum of Understanding for adoption
at a subsequent meeting.
BACKGROUND
Late last year presentations were made to both City Councils by Keith Downs of the Santa
Margarita River Watershed Management Program (Planning Group) and Peter Archuleta of the
Santa Margarita River/San Luis Rey River Watershed Planning Agency/Joint Powers Authority
(JPA). These presentations introduced the Councils to the planning activities curren~y underway
within the Santa Margarita River and its tributaries. Because this work will continue with or
without the cities' cooperation, and because the efforts of these entities represent a potential.
duplication of staff time and resources, the City Councils, at their last joint meeting, directed
both staffs to make a recommendation to join one body or the other.
The two city staffs have since met and discussed the alternatives (Councilman Jerry Allen was
also in attendance). The Councils will recall that Peter Archuleta agreed to a compromise by
suggesting that two elected boardmembers of the ~PA be appointed to the Policy Committee of
the Planning Group. The effort of the JPA will be of a technical nature and narrower in scope
than the issues that are to be reviewed by the Planning Group. The JPA Watershed Plan will
become'part of the Planning Gxoup's Watershed Management Plan that is being prepared by a
consultant. The Planning Group will also offer broader participation by private land owners.
There is nothing preventing the cities from joining the JPA now or later as the need for
implementation becomes necessary. Being pan of the effort to write the Watershed Management
Plan will ensure that each jurisdiction has a voice in how it evolves. A copy of the Planning
Group's Mission Statement has been attached for the Councils' review.
Joint City Councils Staff Report
March 29, 1994
Page 2
Organization
The Planning Group is organized into a Policy Committee and three Advisory Committees. The
proposed Policy Committee is made up of the Fifth District Supervisor from San Diego County,
the First and Third District Supervisors from Riverside County, a representative from the United
States Marine Corp at Camp Pendleton, a Councilmember from both the Cities of Temecula and
Murrieta and two representatives from local water districts. Membership on the Policy
Committee was limited to those agencies who held land use authority within the subject
watershed, with the exception of the local water districts.
The three Advisory Committees are Water Supply and Quality, Recreation/Open Space/Habitat
and Wildlife, and Land Use and Flood Control. Membership on the subcommittees is open to
anyone and is made up of representatives from state and federal regulatory and resource
agencies, water districts, conservation organizations, flood control agencies, resource
conservation districts, landowners and interested citizens.
Staff support is supplied by the Cities, Counties, the Federal Government and a non-profit
Organization.
Memorandum Of Understanding
The City Attorney for each jurisdiction has reviewed the MOU (attached). Each attorney has
stated that the MOU does not commit either city to adopt or subscribe to the Plan once it is
completed, nor does the MOU commit the cities to funding of the project. Each city is
responsible for supplying staff support to the Policy Committee for its representative on the
committee. Either city may withdraw from the MOU upon giving 60 days prior written notice
to all other parties of the MOU. Minor modifications will need to be made to the MOU,
reflecting the addition of the Water District Representatives on the Policy Committee. A final
revised MOU will be brought back to the Councils for adoption.
FISCAL IMPACT
Funds for running the Santa Margarita River Watershed Management Program have so far been
provided by the federal government and a non-profit agency. There are a number of other non-
profit agencies that have indicated a willingness to fund most, if not all, of the program. It is
not known if these funds will come with any additional commitments or obligations.
loint City Councils Staff Report
March 29, 1994
Page 3
The program requires a commitment of staff time. To the extent that this activity diverts staff
resources away from other priorities of the City Council, completion of existing staff
responsibilities will take longer. There have not been any requests for direct monetary
commitments from the city, therefore no direct fiscal impacts have been anticipated at this time.
Attachments
1. Mission Statement
2. Memorandum of Understanding
\SMR~LANjCC
March 21, 1994
ATTACItl%~NT NO. 1
MISSION STATEV[ENT
SANTA MARGARITA RIVER. WATERSHED.
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Mission. Statement
Through a comprehensive and cooperative planning effort,
management entities and the concerned public will fashion
a set of common goals and management strategies to maintain
and restore the eological integrity of the 'Santa Margarita River
resource system while providing for appropriate watershed uses '-
and activities.
Padicipants will seek to identify and foster partnerships to achieve
common goals more efficientlyand economically and to reduce
potential conflicts among diverse projects such as flood control,
sensitive species protection, groundwater recharge and water
supply facilities.
ATTACHlV~ NO. :2
· 1VIEMO~UM OF UNDERSTANDING
Ft~lne~dmy Febr~mry 16, 1996 4:511a -- Page
FROll ~XU CHTV PLRNNEH8 DEPT.
e2. t~.199e
Z5t44
NO. 7
RECEIVED
FEB 16 199
kn'd. .......
P. 2
4
5
6
MEM~UM OF UNDERSTANDING
FOR DBVI]LOPMENT OP A
SANTA MARGARITA RIVER WA~ MANA~ PROGRAM
8
9
10
11
12
This MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) is made and entered
ingothis.. dayof
of San Diego, City
Pcndlcton'
,1993, by, and among the County of Riverside, County
of MUrrietn, City of Temeeula and the "Marine Corps Base, Camp
(Base), haeinaft~ coHecdvely rcfe. al to as the 'Parties' or the =Parties to this
1~ MOU, · pursuant to a joint resolution passed by the Boards of Supervisors for both Counties in
14 September 1989, Which resolution recognized the need for inta-jurisdictional planning and
15
management to protect the stream-rdalzd resourees of the Santa Margarita River system and
stated the intent of the two counties to cooperate in planning for that purpose, and pursuant to
the various State and Federal Laws relating to !and use and environmental planning.
19
20
21
WITNESSETH
22
WHEREAS, the Parties to this MOU are general pu~ local govcmments
25
with land use authority within the Santa Margarlta River watershed and, except for the Base,
25 which is a federal insla!lation with analogous powers.
26
28
WHEREAS, the Santa Marga~ta Rivcr, its tributaries and watershed are highly
valued sccaic, recreational, scientific and educational resources, which w~i prove to be a sound
investment for public hcalth, welfare, and enjoymCn. t for generations to come; and
JUednelday Fd~rLmry 16, 199~ 6:51pm -- P/ge '
FRON RXU CNTY PLRHNIN6 DEPT,
02,1~.1994
i5145
NO, 7
P. 3
J
i
WHERBAS, the Riverside and San Diego County Beards of Su/~rs u
4 development of a plan for multiple goals including conservation and enhancement of ~abitat and
5 biodiversity, protection of water supply and quality, management of storm water runoff,
6 reduction of flood .damage, provision for regional and community open space and recreation,
7 reclamation of water, as well as economically-sustainable and xesource-sensitlve urban
8 dcvclopmatt is a bcneficiat and necessary aim that should b~ accomplished through an
9
10
11' WHERPA3, the goals of the Parties to this MOU include the maintenance and
12 restoration of the ecological integrity of the Santa Margarita River sysr. m while providing for
13 appropriate watershed uses and activities; and
14 WHEREAS, the Patties to this MOU are those agencies executing this MOD
15
as identified on signature poges attached hereto; and
16
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein
17
18 contained, the Parties hereto agree as follows:
19 Section 1. Purpose:
20
21
22
23
24
25
The purpose of this MOU is to establish a Santa Margarita River
Watershed Management Program, which will develop a plan with multiple goals including
conservation and enhancement of lmbitat and biodiversity, protection of water supply and quality,
management of storm waw. r runoff, reduction d flood damage, provision of regional and
community open space and recreation, reclamation of waste water and planning for economically
26
sustainable and resource-sensitive urban development..
//
28
~lklneday February 16, 199& &:51Is -- Page
FRON RIU CNTV PLAHNZH6 DEPT,
92.t&.X994 LSs4& HO. ? P. 4
:l.
Sccfion 2. Administration:
The County of Riverside slull provide day-tx;-day nuuqemast rchtiv~.
to the development of thc ~ mana~ment program to include administrative and support
4
5 personnel, and the other Ph-fies shall provide such additional administrative and clerical suppozt
6 as may be deemed appropriate and necessary by the Policy Committee.
? Section 3. Committees:
8 A Policy Committee shall be established to, inter alia, formulate planning
guidelines for the watershed managb. ment program, receive input for interested agencies and
10
11 coordinate parameters for the eventual acceptance of the Program by each member agency and
12 others, as appropriate.
15 A Policy Committee shallconsist of one member from the elected Council
14 of the City Of Temecula and City of Muftieta, the Supervisors of the First Supervisodal District
15
and the Third Supervisorial District for Riverside County, the Supervisor of the* Fifth District
16
from the County of San Diego, and a repxeseata~ve of time Commanding General of the Base.
18 Appointment to the Policy Committee shall not exceed the appointee's current term in office.
19 A quorum for the purpose of conducting business will consist of four members of the Policy
20
21
22
25
24
25
Committee. The Policy Committee may adopt bylaws, rules and regulations as required to
conduct its business. The Policy .Committce shall conduct regular racerings, at feast annually,
and at other times as may be determined by the committee or provided for in its bylaws. The
Policy Committee shall appoint an Advisory Committec and rcgulatc its activities.
An Advisory Committee shah bc crcated consisting of members from state
26
27
28
and fedenl regulatory and resource ageacles, water districts, conservation organizations, flood
control and water conservation agencies, resource conservation districts, landowner
representatives and interested citizens. The pu~ of the Advisory Committee
3
Itiedr'msdey February 16, 1994, 4:51pm -- Page '
FROg RZU CHTY PLRHNEH6 DEPT.
62.16.1994
iSz47
NO.
P. 5
1
2
:5
4
5
is. to advise the Policy Commi_'_~- by facilitating the transfer of information between a broad-
based group of concerned individuals and organizations to the Policy Committee. The Advisory.
Committee may create subcommittees to address specific issues or concerns. A quorum for
conducting business of the Advisory Committee or its subcommittees will consist of a simple
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
nmjority of the members of the Advisory Committee or respective subcommittce.
Meetings of the Policy and Advisory Committees shall be called, noticed,
held and conducted in accordan& with the provision of the Ralph M. Bwwn Act (commencing
with Section 54950 of the California Government Code.
Section 4. Term:
This MOU shah become effective as to the Paxtlcs that sign, and shall
14
15
16
17
18
19
remain in force until acceptance of the final Santa Margarita River Watershed Management Plan~_~
by such Parties to this ldOU. However, upon giving at least 60 days prior written notice to all
the other Pafiies to this MOU, any Party may withdraw from further participation under this
MOU.
Section 5. Funding:
a. The County of Riverside shall establish a Santa Margarita River
20
24
~5
other third parties. Such funds
management planning program.
Trust Account, which may be funded from the Parties on a voluntary basis, as well as from
shall be used exclusively to support of the watersled
At the termination of this MOU, and accounting and
distribution of any funds remaining, shall be made by the County of Rivezside to the other
Patties of the MOU. Such distribution shall be made on a pro ram basis.
b. The Parties shah endeavor to obUdn funds for can'ying out as many
provisions of this MOU as feasible. However, the unavailability or reduced availability c
funding from any one of the hrties shall not operate to suspend or terminate titis
4
II~lnelday Febl-tjary 16, 199~/~:511:m -- Page
FRO~ RZU CHTV PLRHNZN6 DEPT.
D2.16.1994 1~848 NO. 7 P. 6
1
~5
4
6
9
10
11
12
14
18
19
20
21
22
2~
24
25
27
28
Whenever possible, the Parties shall reduce the 'scope of activities to adapt to changes in
available funding, rather than Rrmlnntc or suspend an activity. The Parties recogniz~ that the
performante of each other under this MOU :ray, from time to time, be unavoidably curtailed
due to lack of funding.
kind" contributions.
This MOU
unanimously by all of the Parties.
Amendment Procen:
may be mended
by awaitten
amendment approved
a. Any Party may propose an an~ndment by providing a written copy
of the proposed amendment to the other Parties. No amendment shaIl become e. ffecave unless
and until it has been ripproved in writing by all of the Parties. The amendment shall t__n_lr~ effect
upon approval of all Parties, unless a later da~ is agreed to.
b. No amendment may be proposed that is inconsistent with the
principles or the goals set forth in this MOU,
Section 7. Indemnification:
Each Party will, to the extent allowed by law; or in the case of the Base
to the extent it may legally do so pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (28 USC 2671
defend, indemnify and hold harmless each other Party against all claims, damages, losses,
judgments, liabilities, expenses, and other eosts including litigation costs and aZtorney's fees
arising out of, resulting from or in connection with. the performance of this MOU by any of its
officers, employees or agents. Bach Party's obligation to defend, indemnify and hoM each other
Party to this MOU harmless applies to any actual or alleged person~ injury, death, or damage
or destzuction to tangible or intangible property including the loss of use.
5
Ivecinescby February 16, 199(, A:51pai -- Page '
FRON RZU CHTV PLRNHZH6 DEPT.
62.16o1994 15:49 NO. ? P. ?
1
2
7
10
11
12
17
18
20
22
2~
24
25
26
'27
28
Section 8. ~-.vetshility:
If any provision of this MOU is judicia!ly determined or held to be invalid.
for any reason, thai invalidity shall not however be imputed to any other provision of this MOU
that was not so determined or held to be invalid.
Section 9. NOdees:
Any notices required or desired to be served by any Party upon the other
shall be add~ to the respective Parties as set forth below:
County of Riverside: City of Temecula:
Chairman Mayor
Board of Supavisors 43174 Business Park Drivo
46209 Oasis Street, Suite 414 Temecula, California 92590
Indio, California 92201-5964
County of San Diego: Marine Corps 9ase, Camp Pendleton:
Chairman Commanding General
Board of Supervisors Attention: AC/S Pacilities
County Administrative Center Box 555013 MC.B
1600 l~..cific Highway, Room 335 Camp Pendleton, California 92005-5013
San Diego, California 92101
City of Murrieta:
Mayor '
26442 Buckman Court
Murrieta, California 92562
Section 10. Other Obligations:
The responsibilitieS and obligations of each Party to this MOU slnll be
solely as provided in this MOU, or as may be provided for in supplemental MOU's to be
executed by the Parties.
// ~-~.
//
~N:lnesdmy February 16, 1996 6:51pm -- Page '
FRON RIU CNTV PLANNING DEPT.
02.16.1994 15858 NO. 7 P. 8
1
7
10
11
14
15
16
17
18.
19
~-0
Section 11. HO~n~i~Ttability:
The rights, titles and intn~sts of any Party to this MOU shall not be
assignablo or tmnsferablo without tho consent of all the Parties.
Section 12. Countcl:parts:
This MOU nmy be execul~l and delivered in any numba of counterparts
or copies ('counterpart') by the Panics to this MOU. When esch Party hss signed and delivered
at least one counterpart to the other Parties to this MOU, each counterpart shall be deemed an
ozi~inal and, talcca togctha shall constilutc one and the same MOU, which slmll be bincrmg and
effective as to the Parties to the MOU.
IN WTI'NF.,SS WHEREOF, all Parties'to this MOU have caused this MOU te
be executed and auested by its proper officers thereunto duly. authorizeci, their officii segs to
be hereJo affixed, as of the date first abov~ written.
Dated: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDB
GERALD A. MALONEY
(lerk of the Board
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
By:
Deputy
[SSAL]
'--'2':.:: i ?..
· ,.- .:.
7
lUechnd,sy F~brtmry 16, 1996 6:51Fm -- Page
FROIf RZU CHTY PLRHHtN6 DEPT.
1
'2
4
5
9
lO
11
12
1G
17
18
lg
20
21
22
2~
24
25
2~
(ssAt,]
city Ckrk
62.16.1994 lSsSe NO. ? p. ~
I0
CITY OF 'I'EMECULA
Titlc: