HomeMy WebLinkAbout040594 CC AgendaAGI:NDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER - 30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD
APRIL 5, 1994- 7:00 PM
EXECUTIVE SESSION: 5:30 PM, Closed Seamion of the City Council pursuant to
1. Govemment Code § 94956.8 Conference with Red Property NegoTiaTor - Under
negotiaTion: Sr. Canter Parking lot property located at 4945 Sixth Street. The
negotiating parties are Kenper Real Estate Management Co. and the City of Temecula.
Under NegotiaTion: Purchase Pdce.
2. Government Code § 94956.9(c) Conference with Legal Counsel - potential
litigation: Tort Claim for $32,393, filed by the City against the ImmigraTion end
NaturalizaTion Service, for the coat of emergency services and counse~ng as a result
of the June 2, 1992 Border Patrol accident.
3. Govemment Code § 54957 - To discuss Public Employee Appointment: Status
report on City Manager Recruitment end review of City Attorney Services Agreement
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining
agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may
continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting.
All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM.
CALL TO ORDER:
Invocation:
Flag Salute:
ROLL CALL:
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 94-12
Resolution: No. 94-33
Mayor Ron Roberrs presiding
Reverend Joan Rich Egea, Church of Religious Science
Councilmember Birdsall
Birdsall, Muftoz, Parks, Stone, Rotarts
Day of the Young Child
R:%AOende~0406i4 I
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited
to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item not listed on the
Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink 'Request to Speak" form should be filled out
and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other egenda items s "Request to Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at
this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members
of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for
separate action.
I Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in
the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of February 28, 1994.
R:t, Agende~O4Or~4 ,~
3
Resolution Aoorovina List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution emitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING
CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
4
6
7
8
City Treasurer's Reoort
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of February 28, 1994.
Exoenditure of Asset Forfeiture Funds
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Authorize staff to use police asset forfeiture funds to purchase computer
equipment.
Final Tract Mao No. 27690
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve Final Tract Map No. 27690 subject to the Conditions of Approval.
Employee Assistance Proaram (EAP)
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Authorize staff to solicit a Request for Proposal (RFP) from qualified firms
experienced in Employee Assistance Programs (EAP).
Council OOOOSitiOn tO AB 3167 and H.R. 3636
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Authorize the Mayor to sign letters in opposition to Assembly Bill 3167 (Epple) and
House of Representatives Bill 3636 (Markey/Fields).
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
9 Ordinance No. 94-10
RECOMMENDATION:
Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-10
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING
CHAPTER 2.08 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE REQUIRING THAT THE GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA BE HELD ON THE FIRST
TUESDAY AFTER THE FIRST MONDAY OF NOVEMBER IN EACH ODD-NUMBERED
YEAR
10 Ordinance No. 94-11
RECOMMENDATION:
10. 1 Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-11
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING
CHAPTER 2.04 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE TIME
AND PLACE OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of
the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court,
you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior
to, the public hearing.
11 Proposed Resolution Regardino Charitable. Relioious and Commercial Solicitation
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Continue the public hearing until the meeting of April 26, 1994.
R:%AOende%O4OgM 4
12
Ordinance Amending Land Use Code Reaardina Plot Plans. Conditional Use Permits and
Public Use Permits
(Continued from the meeting of 4~8~94)
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1
Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING
THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL
USE PERMITS, AND PUBLIC USE PERMITS
12.2
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND USE
CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS,
AND PUBLIC USE PERMITS
13
Ordinance to Reduce Water Consumption Through Efficient Landscaoe Desian. Consistent
with Provisions of AB 325
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Continue the public hearing to the meeting of April 26, 1994.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
14
Procedures and Recommendations for Notice of Public Hearina
RECOMMENDATIONS:
14.1 Provide direction to staff regarding the implementation of Notice of Public Hearing
Procedures.
15
16
Community Service Funding Recommendation
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Review and approve or revise recommendations in response to the applications
received from community based organizations;
15.2 Only consider requests from community based organizations once each year in
connection with this process.
Private Bus Benches in Public Right of Wav
(Requested by Councilmember Muf~oz)
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Provide direction to staff regarding the placing of benches in the public right-of-way.
17
Status Ragerr on Winchester Interchange. Overland Bridae. Winchester/Nicolas
Signalization. Right Turn Lane at Pala Road/Highway 79 South. and Margarita Road
Widening North of Rancho California Road
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1
Receive and file the Status Report on Winchester Interchange, Overland Bridge,
Winchester/Nicolas Signalization, and Right Turn Lane at Pala Road/Highway 79
South.
18
19
Owl Rock Products. Wilson Creek Mine - Owl Rock Sand and Gravel Surface Mining
geeration in the Aguanoa Area
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Receive and file report.
Soeed Undulatign Re-design - Calla Pina Colada
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Increase the maximum height of speed undulations on Calle Pina Colada from two
inches (2") to three inches (3").
20
21
Mavor and Councilmembers Conference Bylaws
(Requested by Mayor Pro Tam Stone)
Status of Prooosed Downsizinp Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1 Receive and file status report on the preparation of the proposed downsizing
ordinance.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting: April 7, 1994, 7:00 PM, Joint CityCouncil/Planning Commission Meeting,
Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
Next regular meeting: April 26, 1994, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho
Vista Road, Temecula, California
R:V~emle~44)~4
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING - (To be held at 8:00)
CALL TO ORDER: President Jeffrey E. Stone
ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Mufioz, Parks, Roberts, Stone
PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a
completed pink 'Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come
forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Final Fee Credits for Paloma Del Sol Park
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Approve a final fee credit of ~ 1,025,349 for Kemper Community Development
Company for the construction and dedication of Paloma Del Sol Park.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before e public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of
the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court,
you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior
to, the public hearing.
Sam Hicks Monument Park Master Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Master Plan for Sam Hicks Monument Park;
1.2 Adopt the Negative Declaration for the project;
1.3 Authorize the preparation of construction documents and release a formal public bid
for the project.
R:'~a4eendeV340~14 I
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting April 26, 1994, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:%/4ende%040614 ·
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
PUBLIC COMMENT:
AGENCY BUSINESS
1
2
3
Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding
AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Mufioz, Roberts, Stone, Parks
Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
Resolution Authorizing Investment in the Local A.encv Investment Fund (LAIF)
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AUTHORIZING INVESTMENT OF DISTRICT MONIES IN THE LOCAL AGENCY
INVESTMENT FUND
Authorization of Acareement for RDA Consulting Services
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the terms of the agreement for RDA Consulting services with PMW
Associates and authorize the Chairperson to execute the agreement, subject to the
approval of the Executive Director and the General Counsel as to the final form of
the agreement.
Authorization of Aoreement for Develooment Advisory Services for the RDA
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Approve the terms of the agreement for Development Advisory Services with Price
Waterhouse and authorize the Chairperson to execute the agreement, subject to the
approval of the Executive Director and the General Counsel as to the final form of
the agreement.
R:V~mde~040~14 10
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next Meeting:
Temecula, California.
April 26, 1994, 8:00 PM, 30875 Rancho Vista Road,
R:%Aeendall4 11
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
The City of Temecula
PROCLAMATION
W~, the Day of the Young Child is an annual celebration that focuses public
attention on the needs of young children and their families; and
WliERIA5, it is particularly important to target the need for. high'quality. early
childhood programs; and
WHEREAS, the National Association for the Education of Young Children'sponsors this
annual celebration nationwide; and
Wm~FAS, the City of Temecula will ~old its annual observance at the Temecula
Elementary School on April 16th from 9:30 AM until 2:30 PM; and
WItER~'AS, area preschools, public schools, P.T:A.' org~nirations and service groups
will provide activities for children accompanied by a parent or adult to enjoy, such as food,
balloons, games and free esltert~inment,
NOW, THER~~, I, Ron Roberrs, on behalf of the City Council of the City of
Temecula, hereby proclaim April 16, 1994 to be
*DAY OF THE YOUNG
IN ~ WIIIxEOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City.
of Temecula to be affixed this 5th day of April, 1994.
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ITEM
1
ITEM
NO.
2
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING
HELD JOINTLY WITH THE
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL AND
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1994
A special meeting of the Temecula City Council and the Temecula Planning Commission
was held on Monday, February 28, 1994, 7:00 P.M., at the Tsmecula City Hall, 43174
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Ran
Roberrs. Councilmember Munoz.
PRESENT: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:'
Birdsall, Munoz, Parks, Stone,
Robarts
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
PRESENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS:
Fahey, Ford
ABSENT: 3 COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Hasgland, Salyer
Also present were City Manager Ran Bradley, City Attorney Scott Fmld, City Clerk June S.
Greek and Recording Secretary Gail Zigler.
PRI:S;NTATIONSI
PROCLAMATIONS
None
PUBLIC COMM;NT
NONe
CITY COUNCIL RFPORTS
None-
COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. Resolution of ADoointment - Interim City Mananer
Ran Bradley advised the Council Section 2, Exhibit A of the Resolution is not
attached and will be brought back for City Council approval at the next regular
meeting.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tam Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
approve staff recommendation with the deletion of Section 2 of the resolution and
direction that the letter of agreement with the City Manager be placed on a future'
agenda.
CC/PCMI~2/28/94 I 3/21
JOINT CITY COUNCILIPLANNINt4 COMMISSION MINUTI=S
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1.
FEBRUARY 28, 1994
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-25
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPOINTING AN INTERIM CITY MANAGER
3.' Development Code Work Prooram
Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report. He told the Council and the
Commission an advisory committee has been meeting to work on the development
codes and they are satisfied with the organization and contents of the draft code.
Mr. Meyer said staff expects some issues to arise in the future regarding the County
(msc) manufacturing service commercial zones. He said staff plans on holding
several industrial area neighborhood meetings and advised that staff has held one
such meeting and it became apperect there may be some resistance to elimination
of the MSC district. Mr. Meyer explained to the Council the Business Park land use
designation is the city's industrial and manufacturing land use designation which
will be split into two districts: the Business Park district and the Light Industrial
district.
Councilmember Birdsall asked what will happen to those businesses that no longer
fit in the Business Park zone.
John Meyer explained there will legal non-conforming uses allowed within the
district. He said after meeting with the property owners along Felix Valdez, which
has been designated as an office professional district through the General Plan, it
became apparent these property owners are not happy with the new designation
and staff has agreed to ,re-evaluate the land use designation on their behalf. He said
they expressed a desire to see no limitations to a single designation and they did
not want to be designated office professional.
Councilmember Munoz asked, should the Council and Commission agreed to
allowing the legal non-conforming uses, what length of time would be allowed
before there was conformance with ell designations of the districts.
Mr. Meyer said the bulk would occur in approximately 3 to 5 years.
Chairman Ford asked if a existing business could expand under the non-conforming
use policy.
John Meyer explained the decision of the committee was a business could continue
to operate and/or sell the business and continue to operate under the non-
CC/PC:MIN02/28/~4. 2 N21)~I.
JOINT CITY COt q~ICILIPLANNINr4 COMMISSION MINUTFR F;:RRUARY .98, 1994
conforming use policy however, it could not expend or rebuild under the policy.
Counciimember Munoz said he feels conforming uses should be achieved through
natural attrition.
City Attorney Scott Field explained there are a range of non-conforming use
ordinances from the strict to the very lenient.
Planning Director Gary Thornhill said the goal is to eliminate retail/commercial uses.
He said staff can group the uses end if a use des not fit into the broad category
then it would be · legal non-conforming use.
The overall consensus of the Council and the Commission was to direct staff as
follows:
The goal is to eliminate, to the greatest extent possible, non-conforming
USeS ·
Non-conforming uses are to eliminated generally through normal attrition.
That the test for any replacements shall be "Is it an in-kind replacement".
That the building permit will be used as a triggering mechanism for
investigating if a non-conforming use is attempting to re-establish in the
ZOne.
To move forward with a process of narrowing the zone districts and not fall
back to the MSC designation.
Chairman Robarts declared a recess at 8:30 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:40 P.M.
2. Presentation and Discussion of Old Town Develooment Conceots
Zev Buffman provided an update on the status of the Old Town Development
Concept. He displayed conceptual drawings of the interior/exteriors of components
of the project as follows:
600 Seat Cabaret Theatre
950 Seat Opera House
Showboat
Arena
Virtual Reality Palace
Mr. Buffman said there has been a great deal of interest in the project expressed by
the entertainment industry.
Councilmember Munoz asked Mr. Buffman what degree of financial commitment he
is asking for.
CC/FCMIN02/28/94 3 3/21/~4
JOINT CITY CnUNCIL/PLANNINr4 COMMISSION MINUTF~ FFBRUARY 99, 1994
Mr. Buffmen said the initial cap on the cost of the study was $250,000, which he
would share equally with the City of Temecule.
Commissioner Fahey asked if the committee who worked on the Old Town Specific
Plan will be re-formed to work on the project.
Planning Director Thornhill supported reactivating the group back together.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to
instruct staff to place the funding of the recommended first phase (initiating special
studies) at a cost of $250,000to be shared equally by the City and T.Z.B.G., Inc.
on the agenda of March 8, 1994 as follows:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Munoz, Parks, Stone,
Roberts
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to re-
activate the Old Town Specific Plan Steering Committee to serve as an advisory
group to the City during the project development~
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Munoz, Parks, Stone,
Roberts
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Adjournment
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, seconded by Councilmember Munoz to adjourn at
10:05 P.M.
ATTEST
Mayor Ron Roberts
June S. Greek
~02/28/94 4 3/21/94
ITEM NO. 3
RF~OLUTION NO.
A RF.,.~LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN ~Xlil~IT A
TH~ CITY COUNCIL OF TH~ C1TY OF T]~IBCULA I~)ES RF.~0LV~,
D~'~INB AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in ~hibit A have been
audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of
$~91,66130.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this ~th day of April, 1994.
ATTEST:'
Ron Robere, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
13 I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
crrY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certi~ that the
foregoing Resolution No. 94-- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City. Council of the
City of Temecula on the 5th day of April, 1994 by the fortowing ron call vote:
AYES: 0
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCK.MEMBERS: None
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
COUNCK.MEMBERS: None
June S. Greek, City Clerk
13 2
TOTAL CHECK RUN:
03/25/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
04/05/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
03/24/04 TOTAL PAYROLI.~
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 04/05/94 COUNCIL MEETING:
DIBBUP, BEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001 GENERAL 1101
100 GAS TAX 143,438.9t
120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND t0.00
185 RDA-LOW/MOD 12.00
190 COMMUNITY SERVICE8 DISTRICT 148,484.08
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A S7,48e. t8
192 TCSD 8ERV1CE LEVEL B 1134.8g
193 TCBD SERVICE LEVEL C I19,336.~4
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 10.00
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) liO,IB2.'18
250 TCSD-.CIP 12,088.00
280 RDA-.CIP 13,520,,3g
300 8ELFdNBURANCE 12,0/1
~ VEHICLES 1800.41
INFORMATION8, SYSTEMS S25,373.45
~ COPY CENTER 12,638.27
~40 FACIUTIES $7,380.16
380 RDA-DEBT SERVICE 12.00
380 TCSD DEBT SERVICE $t31.778.81
PAYROLL:
001 GENERAL (PAYROLL) 121 ,e/4.eg
100 (3A8 TAX (PAYROLL) S~e,et2.81
190 TCSD (PAYROLL) S16,0e0.83
t91 TCBD SERVICE LEVEL A (PAYROLL) 1436.0e
192 TCBD SERVICE LEVEL B (PAYROLL) 652.47
lg3 TCBD SERVICE LEVEL C (PAYROLL) Sl ,71g.94
280 ROA-CIP 886.04
300 8ELF-INeAJRANCE (PAYROLL)
320 INFORMATION BY'STEM8 (PAYROLL) $1,214.48
330 COPY CENTER (PAYROLL) 1681
340 FACIUTIE8 tl, t 22.47
TOTAL BY PUND:
MANAQE~rliY CERTIFY THAT FOLLOWINQ IS TRUE AND C0fM~CT.
~ E. BRADLEY. INTERIM CITY TI~E.
Sl 77,509.43
1214,214.M
126,314.79
$101,822.42
$101,822.42
lBet ,861.50
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 8
03/~''~ 15:08
CITY OF TB4ECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOB ALL PERIODS
FUm)
001
100
1~0
191
1~3
210
280
300
310
320
330
)~0
TITLE
GENERAL FUND
GAS TAX FUND
CI3414UNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
TCW) SERVICE LEVEL A
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
CAPITAL !IqPROVEHENT PROJ FUll)
REDEVELOPIIENT AGENCY - CIP
INSURANCE FUND
VEHICLES FUND
INFOBNATIQN SYSTEMS
COPY CENTER FUND
FACILITIES
TOTAL
NIXIT
46, 7&2.53
10,972.85
19,841
7,243.38
1,3~.99
87, Z88.96
370.57
286.10
132.71
2,&53.92
321.79
510.t6
177,509.4~
VOUCHRE~'
03/17/94
15:08
CITY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOIl ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
33~353
334353
33~353
33~353
33~353
33~353
334353
33~353
33~353
334353
33~353
334353
33~353
33~353
334353
334353
33~353
334353
33~353
392262
392262
392262
392262
392262
392262
392262
392262
392262
392262
392262
392262
392262
392262
392262
392262
392262
392262
392262
14131
14131
14131
14131
14131
14131
14132
14133
CHECK VENDOR VEI)OR
DATE IllER MANE
03116/W,
0)/16/94
03/16/94
0)/16/94
0)/16/94
03116194/,
0)/16/W~
0)/16/94
03/16/96
0)116/9~
0)/16/9~
03/16/94
03/16/96
0)11619~
03/16/94/,
03/16/94/,
03/16/94
0)/16/94/,
03/16/94/,
03/16/9~.
03/16/944,
0)/16/94
03/16/9~
0)/16/94
0)/16/94
03/16/94
03/16/94/,
03/16/9/,
03/16/94
03/16/94
03/16/94
0)/16/9~
03/16/94
03/16/94
03/16/94
03/16/94
0)116194
03/16/94
0)/17/94.
03/17/94
0)/17/94
0)/17/94
0)117/94
03/17/94
000/~ FIRSTAX (EDD)
0004~ FIRSTAX (El)D)
000M~ FIRSTAX (El)D)
000444 FIRSTAX (EDD)
0004.~ FIRSTAX (EDD)
OOO~ FIRSTAX (ED!))
O~ FIRSTAX (EDO)
0004~ FIRSTAX (EDD)
OOO/:~' FIRSTAX (EDD)
00L~.~ FIRSTAX (EDD)
000~ FIRSTAX (El)D)
00L~ FIRSTAX (EDD)
00044~ FIRSTAX (EDD)
O00~ FIRSTAX (EDD)
O00,H~ FIRSTAX (EDD)
000(-~ FIRSTAX (EDD)
~ FIRSTAX (EDD)
000444 FIRSTAX (EDD)
ODO44Z, FIRSTAX (EDD)
000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS)
000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
000283 F]RSTAX (IRS)
000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
00028~ FIRSTAX
00028~ FIRSTAX (]RS)
000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
000283 FIRSTAX(IRS)
000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
000283 FIRSTAX (]RS)
000283 FIRSTAX (]RS)
001222
001222
001222
001222
001222
001222
000102
001266
ALPHA CONNUNICATIONS, I
ALPHA CONI4UN!CATIONS, I
ALPHA COI414UNICATIONS, I
ALPHA COIIJNICATIONS, I
ALPHA COINUNICATIONS, l
ALPHA CONHUNICATIONS,
ANERICAN FENCE OD. OF C
AHERICAN PLANNING ASSOC
ITEH
DESCRIPTION
000/,-~ EDI
000J~ STATE
000444. STATE
00Lv:z:/: STATE
000444. STATE
0004~ STATE
00044~ STATE
00044~ STATE
0004/~ STATE
0004.44 STATE
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 NEDICARE
000283 NEDICARE
000283 NED l CARE
000283 NED I CARE
000283 NED l CARE
000283 NED I CARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 NED I CARE
000283 NED l CARE
000283 liED I CARE
PAGERS/TC$O
PAGERS/B&S
PAGERS/INFO. CTR.
PAGERS/PW
PAGERS/POLICE
PAGERS/FIN
FENCE RENTAL
HOTEL/CONF.
ACCOUNT
NUliER
001-2070
· 100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
lf3-2070
280-20/0
300-2070
320-2070
' 33o-Z070
:~0-2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
280-2070
3O0-2070
320-2070
330-2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
190-180-999-5238
001-162-999-52~8
320-199-999-5238
100-164.-999-5238
001-170-999-5242
001 - 14,0-999-5250
190-180-999-5238
001-161-999-5258
ITEN
N4OUNT
1,056.70
290.61
261.01
7.66
27.47
14.20
9.16
24.25
10.25
11.09
2,167.47
714.13
482.35
20.96
29.51
55.29
15,71
8,738.36
2,949.02
2,239.58
82.55
2/,5
131
77.87
266.24
89.27
2,381.78
647.32
582.74
17.07
61.29
31 °68
20.42
54.00
22.86
24.74
110.00
33.00
11.00
18.33
145.00
125.00
CHECK
ANOUNT
18,643.35
242.00
145.00
12r,--~
OV~/~JE~ 15:08
CITY OF TBiECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOG ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHEC.,I( VENDOR VIEII)OR ITEM
NIJNBER DATE ~R IIAqE DESCltIPTIOG
14134 03/17/94 001346 AHERzCAN PLANNING .:.SS~C_~ MQRKSHOP/LB
14135 03117194 000747 APA/PLANNERS BOOKSTORE
14136 03/17/9/, OO1323 ARROMHEAD MATER
14137 0]/17/94 000?45 AT & T- CELLULAR
14137 03/17/9~ O00?45 AT & T - CELLULAR
14138 03/17/94 BENDTKSON, DON
14139 0]/17/94 0(X)878 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
14140 03/17/94 001350 BUSINESS EDIJCATIOG HENI SENINAR/PS,NS
lOOK FOG LiBRNtY
FEB .MATER
619'f67' 1828/IiICH
909 - 202 ' 1200/F EB
BENDIKSON, DOll
ACCIXJNT
~ER
001-161-999-5261
001-161-999-5228
]40-199-999-5240
001-140-999-5208
322-199-999-5208
001 - 199-4056
001-1500
001-162-999-5261
14141 03/17/94 001073 BiJTTERI)RTH
NATEIIAL FOR N)A NMItlL 001-150-999-5228
14142 03/17/94 000637 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TA 000837 FRAN TAX 001-2160
14142 03/17/94 000837 CAL]FOGNIA FRANCHISE TA 000~7 FRAN TAX 100-21&0
14143 03/17/94 000950 CALIFOGNIAN - DISPIJkY ~ AJINOUNCEHEIITS OD1-150-999-525/,
14/~'~ 03/17/94 000950 CALIFOGNIAN - DISPLAY 2 C(X,. X 8 INCH DISPLAY 001-140-999-5254
141,,4 03/17/96 001247 CENTRAL I, OHZTOGZNG COGP NONITOG]NG SERVICE 100-181-999-5250
16145 03/17/94 000137 CHEVROG U.S.A. iNC.
14145 03/17/96 000137 CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
14145 03/17/94 OO013? CHEVR~ U.S.A. INC.
14145 03/17/94 O00137 CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
FUEL/SHERiFF
.FUEL/iN
FLEL/B&S
FIJEL/PLANNZNG
001-1fi)-999-5262
001-110-999-5263
001-162-999-5263
001-161-999-5262
14146 03/17/94 000~2 CITY OF TEHECULA - FLEX RE!II. FOG 3/10/94 P/R
1414~ 03/17/94 0006/,2 CITY OF TENECULA - FLEX REIIIB. FOG 3/10/W, P/R
141~6 03/17/94 000~2 CITY OF TENECULA - FLEX HEIII. FOG 3/10/94P/R
14146 03/17/94 00064.2 CITY OF TENECULA - FLEX REINB. FOG 3/10/94 P/R
14166 03/17/94 000~2 CITY OF TEIECULA - FLEX RE!II. FOG 3/10/94 P/R
001-10Z0
100-1020
280-1020
3OD-1020
330-1020
14147 0]/17/94 000914 CIK)A SEN[IIM/CALIF. NARCOTIC 001-170-999-5261
14148 03/17/94 001352 COIIIUNICATIOG BRIEFING SUBSCRIPTION 322-199-999-5228
16149 03/17/94 001275 CO~RV, INC.
FEB. SERV. 320-199-999-5228
16150 03/17/94 000757 CONCISE CONSTRUCTION -FINAL RETENTION
210-2035
14151 03/17/94 000155 DAVLIN
VIDEO/AUDIO TAPE
001-100-999-5250
14152 03/17/94 0001~, ESGIL CORPORATION 2/01-2/28
14153 03/17/94 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS POSTArE/iN
14~03/17/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5~73-666~-0391-0032/14J
001-162-999-52~8
001 - 110-999-5Z30
001-144)-999-5258
ITEN
AHOUNT
65.00
48.90
42.83
14.19
.65-
35.00
4,740.52
198.00
42.00
85.51
85.51
105.92
105.00
27.75
loo.5o
8.52
21.03
726.66
Z.00
21.24
16.25
22.07
~0.78
9.50
280.54
PArE 2
CNECK
AI, IOUNT
65.00
&8.00
42.03
13.54
35.00
4,740.52
198.00
42.00
171.02
2O/,.86
105
157.80
3,814.87
225.00
69.00
22.07
5/,,843.82
710.78
806.72
9.50
VOUCHRE~'
03117/94
15:00
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOIl ALL PERICl)S
PA~
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
1~,15~.
1415/,
1/.155
1/.156
1/.157
1/,158
14159
14160
14161
14161
14161
16161
1/.16~
1416;1
1/.166
1/.1~
14168
14170
14171
CHECK
DATE
03117/9~
03/17/94
03/17/94
03117194
03117/94
0.3/17/94
03/17/94
0311719~
03/17/94
03/17/94
03/17/94
03/17/94
03117194
03117/94
03117194
03/17/9/*
03/17/94
03/17/9/*
03/17/9/*
03/17/94
03/17/94
03/17/94
0311719/*
03/17/9/*
0311719/*
03117194
03/17/94
03117/94
0311719/*
0311719/*
03/17/94
03/17/94
03117194
VENDOR VENIXI ZTER
NUNBER M DESCRIPTION
001002 FIRST INTERSTATE 84NK - 54736664039100/,0/PB
001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 54 zz73,f,f,%O3910081/RR
001002 FIRST INTERSTATE RANIC - 5~73666~03910081/RR
001335 FRANK g. ABAGNALE & A~ TRAINING MATERIALS
~ FREEDOH COFFEE, INC. [:OFFRE SERVICE FOH CITY
001355 GTE CALIFORNIA PHONE LINES
00018~ GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPOR ~09-181-1123
00018~ GTE CALIFOHNZA INCORPOR ~O~-t-8632/HAR.
000/,23 H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU N!SC. 5tJPPLIES
00019'5 ICIIA
STRATEGIC PLANNING BOOK
000194 iCNA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 0001~ DEF COIIP
0001~ ICNA RETIRBtENT TRUST/* 0001~4 DEF COMP
00019/, iCNA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 00019/, DEF COMP
00019~ ICMA RETIREMENT TIWST 4 00019/, DEF ~
00019/, ICNA RETIREMENT TRUST/* 00019~ DEF ~
0001~4 ]ClIA RETIREMENT TRUST/* O001W, DEF COMP
0001~ ]CNA RETIREMENT TRUST/* 0001~ DEF COlF
000194 iCHA RETIREMENT TRUST/* O001W, DEF CONP
0013~1 INDUSTRIAL CONCRETE CUT CONCRETE CUTTING
001351 INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC REGISTRATION/RUSERTS
0013~0 INNOVATIVE litAGES IqARKETING DES/GN CRC
000203 JONS AVAILABLE, INC. JUS ANNOUNCEMENT
001238 K.E. PATTERSON CO. LTD.
001238 K.E. PATTERSON CO. LTD.
001238 K.E. PATTERSON CO. LTD.
0012.',',',',',',',',"$8 K.E. PATTERSON CO. LTD.
· 001238 K.E. PATTERSON CO, LTD.
001238 K.E. PATTERSON CO. LTD.
STREET IHItOVENENTS
IOX RETENTION
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
IOX RETENTION
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
10~ RETENTION
001356 LA MESA, CiTY OF
SURVEY DOCUMENTS
000~14 LONGS DRUG STORE
FILM PROCESSING
001)/.5 LOS ANGELES CHILDRENS N TZCRETS/DAY CAJf
000653 LUCKY STORE SUPPLIES COOKIE IONSTER
00021/* LUNCH & STUFF CATERING BOX LUNCHES
ACCOUNT
NtlaER
001-100-999-5258
001 - 100-999-5260
001 -lOS-999-5238
001-1/*0-999-5261
3/*0-1~-~-5230
320-1~-~-5208
320-1~PJ~9-5208
320-1F)-~-5200
1~0-180-~-5301
001-110-~-5228
001-2080
100-2080
190-2080
191-2060
lf3-2080
280-2080
300-2080
3/*0-2080
1~0-180-~-5250
001-100-~-5238
lf0-180-~-5301
001-150-~F~-5254
210-1~,-627-5804
210 - 2035
210-166-&27-5804
210-2035
210-1e6-627-5804
210-2035
001 - 110-~-5222
1~0-180-~9-5250
1~0-103-9~-5~0
1f0-183-9fg-5320
001-100-~-57..~0
ITEM
AMOUNT
)60.00
100.13
344.71
27/*.00
166.85
682 .:33
606.27
17.17
40.96
25 ./.5
1,965.~0
563.73
~87.69
/.1.66
5.00
23.37
50.00
553.iX)
20.00
7~6.75
252.00
1o380o00
138.00-
13,057.75
1,305.78-
21,528.60
2,152.86-
13.80
35.00
30.00
CHE~
NITJNT
1,093.~
2~.~
1~.~
68,?..~
623 .~
~.~
25
3,1~.~
553.~
20.00
252.~
32,~9.71
13.~
35.~
30.~
03/15:08
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUIt
14172 03/17/94 001142
14173.03/17/9~ 000224
14174 03/17/94 001130
14175 03117/94 000399
14175 03117/9~ 000399
14176 03/17/9~ 000587
14177 03/17/94 001353
14178 03117/94 000881
14178 03117/94 000881
14179 03117/94
14180 03117/9~ 000243
1418103/17/94 00135/,
1~""' 03/17/94 0002~6
16'1~/03/17/9~ 0002/.6
14182 03/17/94 0002~6
14182 03/17/94 0002~6
14182 03/17/94 0002~6
14182 03/17/9~ 000246
14182 03/17/94 00024,6
14182 0311719~ 0002~6
14182 03/17/9~ 000246
14182 03/17/94 000246
14182 03/17/94 0002~6
14182 03/17/96 000246
14182 03/17/96 000246
14182 03/17/94 0002/,6
14182 03/17/94 00024,6
14182 03/17/94 0002~6
14182 03/17/94 000246
14182 03/17/9/,. 000246
14182 03/17/94 0002~6
14182 03/17/94 000246
14182 03/17/94 00024,6
14182 03/17/94, 00024,6
1418~ 03/17/9A 000269
14183 03/17/94 I31313269
16183 03/17/9~ D00269
14183 03/17/9~ 013t3269
000249
M
NARKHN4& ASSOCIATES
NELAD & ASSOCIATES
NK BATTERY
MUNICIPAL lIGHT A$SIST.S
MUNICIPAL lIGHT ASSIST.S
MUNOZ, MARION.
NATIONAL INFORMATION DA
OAKRIDGE LANDSCAPE/IRRI
OAKRIDGE LANDSCAPE/IRRI
P.A.P,A,
PAYLESS DRUG STOeE'
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK HEG[STER
FOR ALL PERtCOS
ITBI
DESCRIPTION
ENGINERING SERVICES
PL.NtCK FEES
BATTERIES
ANNUALNENBERSHIP/LR
ANNUAL NBIERSHIP/GY
JANZTCRIAL SERVICES
RENBIL ZiP CCl)ES
REPLACEHENT LANDSCAPE
REPLACEMENT LAI)SCAPE
HENINARIBH
FILM AND FILM PROCESSIN
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-180-999-5250
001-162-999-52/,8
310-180-999-5214
001 - 1&0-999-5226
001-150-999-5226
190-181-999-5250
330-199-999-5220
100-166-999-54.02
100-164.-999-5402
190-180-999-5258
001-162-999-5250
PC MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTION 320-199-99~-5228
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREII 00024~ PER REDE 001'2130
PERS BIPLOYEES' RETIREN 0002/,6 PER REDE 100-2130
PERS BIPLOYEES' RETIREM __n~02~ PERS RET 001'23~0
PERS BIPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 100-2390
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIItEM 0002/,6 PERS HET 190-2390
PERS EMPLOYEES'. RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 191-2390
PERS BIPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 PERS HET 19.5'2390
PERS BIPLOYEES' RETIREM 0002/,6 PERS HET 280-2390
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETILql 0002/,6 PERS RET 300'2390
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 320'2390
PERS EMPLOYEES' HETIIEII 0002~ PERS RET 330-2390
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRBI 0002/,6 PERS RET 340-2390
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN Q002&6 SURVIVOR 001'2:$90
PERS EMPLOYEES; RETZREM 0002/,6 SURVIVOR 100-2390
PERS EMPLOYEES# RETIREM 00024,6 SURVIVOR 190-2390
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 0002/,6 SURVIVOR 191'2390
PERS EMPLOYEES' EETIREtl 00024~ SURVIVOI~ 19.5'2390
PERS BIPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 280-2390
PERS EtFLOYEES' RETiltEII O00Z~6 SUItVIVOIt 300-2390
PERS BIPLOYEES' RETIREM 0002/o6 SURVIVOR 320'2390
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRBI 0002~6 SWtVIVOIt 330'2390
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SUItVIVOR 34,0-2390
CASH REI!I. FCR CITY Ell
CASH REI!I. FCR CITY EN
CASH REIlI. FCR CITY EM
CASH REliC. FOR CITY EM
CASH REINB. FOR CITY EN
CASH REINB. FCR CITY EH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
001-100-999-5220
001-100-999-5260
001 - 110-999-5260
001-110-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-120-999-5260
ITBI
939.75
60.00
60.130
200.00
97.00
165.00
45
42.98
34.97
107.35
107.35
10,456.05
2,688.68
2,4~7.70
80.06
284.39
155.58
232.35
10~.86
122.01
55.35
12.17
12.9.5
1.4J,
.56
.~6
.9.5
.9'5
.9.5
10.76
12.00
6.00
4.28
6.23
23.CO
PAGE 4
CHECK
N4QtlT
80.00
200.00
262.00
45.00
42.98
3~.97
16,968.4~
VOIJCHRE2 CITY OF TENECIJLA
03117194. 15:08 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PA~.~
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEN ACCOUNT
NUIIER DATE lltleER !lANE DESCRIPTION NUNBER
ITEN
N4OUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
16183 03/1719~, 000269 PETTY CASH CASH REINB. FOR CITY Ell Q01-160-999-5260
16183 03/17/94 00024.9 PETTY CASH CASH liEIS. Fm CITY Ell 001-150-999-5260
14.183.03/17/94 00024.9 PETTY CASH CASH REIllB. FOR CITY Ell OO1-163-999-5220
14.183 03/17/94 000269 PETTY CUH CASH REillB. FOR CITY Ell 001-163-999-5260
16183 03/17/94 08024.9 PETTY CASH CASH REIHB. FOR CZTY Ell 081-t63-999-5226
16183 03/17/96 OOOZ4.9 PETTY CASH CASH REIB. FOR CITY Ell 100-16~-999-5218
14.183 03/17/96 000269 PETTY CASH CASH REINB. FOR CITY EN 190-180-999-52~
14.183 o3/17/94 ooo269 PETTY CASH CASH REIllB. FOR CITY Ell 190. t80-9O9-5260
14.183 03/17/94. 000269 PETTY CASH CASH REINB. FOR CiTY EN 190-183-999-5320
18.00
5.00
13.31
20.4.2
7.76'
36.76
4.5.26
17.98
50.52
279.28
14.186 03/17/94. 00133? POLISHED PRESENTATIQllS PRESENTAT]OR TRAINING 001-14.0-999-5261
35.53
35.53
14.185 03/17/94 000253 POSTMASTER POSTAGE/HR 001-150-999-5~30
14.185 03/17/94. OOO253 POSTMASTER P~TNE/PLAN 001-161-999-5~30
14.185 03/17/96 OOO253 POSTMASTER POSTA~E/INFO SYST. 330-199-999-5~30
14.185 03/17/94 OOO253 POSTMASTER POSTAGE/CH 001-110-999-5Z30
14185 03/17/9~ OOO253 POSTMASTER POSTA~E/CTY CLRK 001-120-999-5230
16185 03/17/96 OO0253 POSTMASTER POSTAGE/PU 001-163-999-5Z30
19.9O
29.85
9.95
9.95
19.90
9.95
99.50
16186 03/17/94 000255 PRO LOCK &KEY NISC. LOCKSHITH SERVICE 19O-180-9~-5212
14.186 03/17/96 000255 PRO LOCK &KEY LOCKSNITH SERV. 190-180-999-5212
14.187 03117194 000879 RADISSON HOTEL - VISALI HOTEL/CONF/KELLI BEALE OO1-161-999-5261
14.188 03/17/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA gATER 01/13-02/10 193-180-999-524.0
8.50
238.56
154.OO
54.9.4.0
24.7.06
54.9.60
14.189 03/17/96 001279 .RANCHO NE~S
1/2 PAGE ADVERTISEMENT OO1-14.0-999-5~54.
)~0.83
16190 03/17/94 001296 RED LION HOTEL
ROCH RESERV./COCC COlIF. 19O-180-999-5258
14191 03/17/96 000266 RIGHTgAY
RENT PORTABLE TOILET 100-164.-999-5238
57.39
5?.39
16192 03/17/96 000353 RIVERSIDE COUNTY AUDITO LETTERS/PARCELS
190-180-999-5370
15.00
15.Q0
14.193 03/17/96 000354. RIVERSIDE COUNTY HEALTH PERNIT/PALONA DEL SOL 19O-180-999-5250
326.OO
326.00
16196 03/17/94 001122 SCOTCH PAINT CONPORATIO PAINT, ROLLERS;M]$C. 1OO-1d4-999-5218
262.91
262.91
14.195 03/17/94. 001:~7 SENATE PUBLICATIONS HOIJ$1NG ELEllENT
001-161-999-52Z8
6.47
6.67
16196 03/17194. OO0~34. SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS CONFERENCE APRIL 27-~9 OO1-161-999-5261
175.00
175.OO
14.197 03117/94. 000~85 SIR SPEEDY 5QO BUSINESS CARDS/TONY 001-167.-999-5~0
14.197 03/17/96 OO07.85 SiR SPEEDY BUSINESS CARDS/RONALD E 001-110-999-5~Z0
14.197 03/17/94. 000285 SIR SPEEDY TAX 001-110-999-5220
16197 03/17/96- 000285 SIR SPEEDY 500 BLKiMIITE BUSINESS 001-162-999-5222
16197 03/17/94 000285 SIR SPEEDY TAX 001-162-999-5222
93.4.1
1.86
24..00
1.86
14.5.13
16198 03/17/94 O007(X SI(S, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL/TS 100-164.-999-5263
16198 03/17/96 00070~ $KS, INC./IRLAllD OiL FUEL/TCSD 190-180-999-5263
16198 03/17/94 O0070& SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL/B&S 001-162-999-526~
4?4..35
77.31
4.1.99
PAGE 6
~/VOt~2 15:08
CiTY Of TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERlOBS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENIXI VENDOR
NUI4BER DATE NtlIER M
ITBI
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
ITB4
CHECK
NKXJNT
16199 0311719~. 080376 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 01126-03/0&.
16199 0311719~ 00037/* SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28
14.19~ 0)/1-7/9/, 000376 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28
14.199 03/17/9~ 00037/, SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28
1/.199 03/17/9/* 00037/, $aJTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28
1/.199 03/17/9/, 00037/, SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 02/01-02/28
1/.199 0~117194. 00037/, SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28
1/,199 03117194. 00037/, SOUTHERE PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28
1/,199 03117194. 080)7/,' SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28
14.199 03/17/9~ 000)74. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-0Z/28
1/,199 0311719/, 000374 SOUTHERE PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/Z8
14,199 03/17/94 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON. 01/31-02/28
14.199 03/17/94 000374. SOUTHERE PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28
14.199 03/17/94. 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28
14.199 03/17/94 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28
14.199 03/17/94. 00037/, SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28
14.199 03/17/94 000374. SOIJTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28
14.199 03/17/94 000374. SOUTHERE PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28
14.199 03/17/94 00037/, SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28
14.199 03/17/94 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 10/21-02/28
14.199 0:$/17/94. 00037/, SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28
1~I"*' 03/17/94 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 0t/31-02/28
l& ., 03/17/94. 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28
14.1'W 03/17/94. 00037/, SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28
14.199 03/17/94 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28
14.199 03/17/94. 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 02/02-03/07
14.199 0:$/17/94. 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 02/02-03/07
14.1~9 03/17/9/* 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 02/03-03/08
14.199 0:$/17/9/* 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-03/08
14.1~ 03/17/94 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/27-03/08
14.1~ 03/17/9/, 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 0Z/08-03/0~
14.1gg 03/17/9/* 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 02/08-03/0~
14.1~ 03/17/94 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 12/Z3-01/26
14.1~ 03/17/94 000376 SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 12/23-01/26
19Q-18Q-999-5Z~Q
.191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
t9t-t80-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-524.0
190-180-999-52/,0
190-182-999-524.0
1,511.50
36.16
39.28
19.03
8.82
33.67
36.96
53.73
39.78
35.32
38,18
18,18
121.21
28.37
23.85
5,067,52
30,13
67.16
Lt.62
27.~
37,34.
158.12
20~ .96
53.71
251.06
228.7~
58.05
3,315.13
087.66
12,65/*,10
14.200 03/17194 000;175 SOUTHERN
1/.200 03/17/9~ 000375 SOUTHERN
14.200 03/17/94 000)75 SOUTHERN
14.200 03/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN
14.200 03117194 0Q0375 SOUTHERN
14.200 03/17/94 QQ0375 SOUTHERN
14.200 03/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN
14.200 03/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN
14.200 03117194 000375 SOUTHERN
14.200 03117194 0003.75 SOUTHERN
14.200 03117194 000375 SOUTHERN
14.200 03117/9/* 000375 SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA TEL 909"ZO2"4.Tr'JB/RR
CALIFORNIA TEL
CALIFORNIA TEL 909-202-4.753/BH
PAL]FORNIA TEL 909-202-4.754.1KH
CALIFORNIA TEL 909-202-/,7551VAN
PAL]FORNIA TEL 909-202-4.756
PAL]FQIUtIA TEL 909-ZQ2-4.759/TE
CALIFORNIA TEL 909-202-/.762/RP
CALIFORNIA TEL 909-202-/.763/PB
CALIFORNIA TEL 909-202-676/*/JH
PALIFOItNIA TEL 909-282-/.765/TS
CALIFORNIA TEL 909-202-/.769/JS
001-100-999-5206
081-110-999-5208
190-180-999-5206
190-180-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
081-162-999-5208
001 - 100-999-5208
081 - 100-999-5208
108-1(:4-999-5208
108-164.-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
65,82
60.14.
35
35
/,9.92
76.24.
36.38
77.89
4.3.96
64.75
633.86
14.20103/17/94 000291 Sl)EE DEE OIL CHAN~E & T OIL CHANGE 310-162-999-5214. 20,99
1~1~. 03/17/94 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T OIL CHANGE 310-162-999-521/, 20.99
VOUCHRE2
03117194
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUIIER
14202
14202
14202
14202
14202
14202
14202
14202
14202
14202
14202
14203
16204
14204
14204
14205
14206
14206
14206
14206
14207
14207
14208
14208
14208
14208
14208
14208
14209
16209
14209
14210
14211
14212
16213
15:08
CHECK
DATE
03/17/94
o3/17/96
03/17/96
03/17/96
03/17/94
03/17/96
03/17/96
03/17/94
03117104
03/17/96
03117194
03/17/96
03117/94
03/17/96
03117/96
03117196
03117194
03117194
03117194
03117194
03/17/96
03/17/96
03117196
03117/96
03117/94
03117/94
03117 /9~
03117/94
03117/96
03117/96
03/17/96
03117/94
03117/96
03117196
03/17/96
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR VENDOR ]TEN ACCOUNT ZTEN
NUIIER M DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT
0OO3O5
000307
000307
000307
0~22
000325
000325
000325
000325
0OO326
000326
001065
001065
001065
001065
001O65
001065
00O389
000389
0OO389
000339
001076
000539
STATE CONPENSATION INS. NARCH 9~
STATE CClIPENSATION INS. NARCH 96
STATE COMPENSATION INS. NARCH 94
STATE COMPENSATION INS. NARCH 96
STATE COMPENSATION INS. NARCH 96
STATE C.,IXFENSATZON INS. NARCH 96
STATE CC)W~ENSATION INS. IMRCN 96
STATE CONPENSATION INS. IMRCH 94
STATE COIIPENSATION INS. MARCH 94
STATE CQMPEN$AT]ON INS. NARCH PNT FOR MKER CCIqP
STATE COMPENSATION INS. IMRCH PtIT FOR Wla~R CONP
TARGET STONE NISC. 51JPPLIES
TENEGULA TROPHY CO.
TEMEClJLA TROPHY OD.
TEMECULA TROPHY OD.
UNIGL08E BUTTERFIELD TR
UNITED SlAY OF THE INLAN
UNITED t4AY OF TIE INLAN
UNITED StAY OF THE INLAN
UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. COIP.
USCH/PEBSCO (DEF. CAMP.
USa4/PEBSCO (DEF. CCI4P.
USCR/PEBSOD (DEF. CONP.
USCH/PEBSCO (DEF. CCIIP.
USa4/PEBSOD (DEF. CI34P.
IJSCR/PEBSCO, (08RA)
USCN/PEBSCO, (08RA)
USa4/PEBSCO, (OBRA)
gIST PUBLISHING COMPANY
kfSTERN WASTE, INC.
WINNER YANADA ASSOCIATE
WOI)PERFECT CORP.
TROPHIES
NISC. SUPPLIES
TROPHIES
AIRFARE/COMPUTER CONFER
OO0325 Ug
OOO325 U~
OOO325 tN
000325 UN
Z GETS OF UNIFORMS CLEA
UNIFORN RENTAL
001065 DEF CONP
001005 DEF COHP
001065 DEF COI4P
001005 DEF COHP
001065 DEF COHP
CREDIT HEHO
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
PUBLICATIONS
PORTABLE TOILET RENTALS
REIMBURSABLES
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
191-2370
193-Z37'0
300-2370
320-2370
330-2570
34,0-237O
001-1182
001-1182
100-182-999-5301
100-180-999-5301
001-110-999-5220
100-182-999-5301
001-161-999-5261
001-2120
100-2120
190-2120
280-2120
100-164-999-5243
100-180-999-5243
001-2080
100-2080
190-2080
300-2080
320-2080
001-2080
001-2160
100-2160
190-2160
001-120-999-5228
100-180-999-5238
210-190-120-5802
320-1~-~;~-5228
2,414.93
1,321.95
926.14
60.17
85.66
6.22
15.08
6.81
91.71
101.58
62.23
37.16
25.86
41.24
25.86
161.00
78.9O
1.00
17.00
.60
25.00
16.10
3,024.01
197.98
156.32
3.~6
312.50
190.00-
102.82
9'3.00
137.96
24.8O
455.00
75.45
36.00
CHECK
AROUNT
5,092.4,8
37.16
92.96
161.00
97.50
39.10
3,504.27
TOTAL CHECKS
177,50~.43
PAGE 8
~/~E~- 10:59
CITY OF I'E4ECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK HEGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
FIJNI) . TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 CCNNUNZTY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TC$1) SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL ZNPROVEHENT PROJ FUND
250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSO
280 REDEVELOPtENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FUND
320 INFORHATIOII SYSTENS
3'30 COPY CENTER FUND
3~0 FACILITIES
390 TCSO DEBT SERVICE
TOTAL
JT
41,860.39
9,938.36
21,222.09
242.80
13&.89
1,988.3&.
1,037.00
326.00
258.64
16?.7'0
6,1)9.Z~
131,778.61
216,21&.86
VOUCHRE2 CiTY OF TENECULA
03/25/96 10:59 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIII)S
VOIJCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VEIIDOR iTEM AC(XXJNT
NLNBER DATE ~ER NAIIE DESCRIPTTON ~ER
ZTEN
AHOUNT
CHECK
AHOUNT
14214 03/21/94 0013~5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPART CRC INSPECTIN KITCHEN 250-190-129-580~
326.00
357~N38 03/26/~6 000~ FIRSTAX (El)D) 000~/:~ SDI 001-2070
357908 03/26/9400e/:z.': FIRSTAX (EDD) OOC~ SD! 100-2070
35?908 03/26/W, OOL~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~~. SD[ 190-2070
357908 03/26/96 000/:~/: FIRSTAX (EDD) O00~z~z~ SDI 191-2070
357~08 03/24/94 0004~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 000/:/:/: SDI 192-2070
357~08 03/26/W, 000//~/~ FIRSTAX (El)D) OOL~/: SD] 193-2070
357908 03/24/94 00(:)z,4~ FIRSTAX (EDD) O013A4~ S01 280-2070
357908 03/24/94 O01)Z,~ FIRSTAX (El)D) O00/~-z_~ SI)! 300-2070
357q;08 03124194/, 000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~ ~i)l 320-2070
35?;08 03/26/W, ~ FIRSTAX (EDD) O0(W~ SOl 330-2070
357~08 03/26/~4 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 00(~./.-/.- $13! 34~)-2070
357~08 03/26/W, ~ FIRSTAX.(EDO) 000/:/:/: STATE 001-2070
357908 03/24/94 00(0~/~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 00(0~ STATE 100-2070
351RN38 03126/94 000/:/:/: FIRSTAX (EDD) OOL~ STATE 1~0-2070
357908 03/26/96 000/:/:~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~ STATE 191-2070
357908 03/26/94 0006/~ FIRSTAX (EDD) O01Y,4~ STATE 193-2070
357908 03/26/94 OOC~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 00134~4 STATE 280-2070
357908 03/2~/94 O00Z,/~ FIRSTAX (B)D) O01Y,4~ STATE 300-2070
357908 03/26/940I)O~Z~ FIRSTAX (EDD) O01)~G~ STATE 320-2070
357908 03/26/94 0004~4G FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~4/, STATE 330-2070
3(Y;gg3 03/26/96 000283 FIRSTAX ([RS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070
369993 03/26/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 100-2070
369993 03/26/96 000283 FIRSTAX (ZRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070
369993 03/26/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 191-2070
369993 03/26/96 000283 FIRSTAX (]RS) 000283 FEDERAL 192-2070
3&F;~73 03/26/96 000283 FIRSTAX (]RS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070
369993 03/2%/96 000283 FIRSTAX (]RS) 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070
369993 03/26/96 000283 FIRSTAX (ZRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070
)6Fj;~Jr3 03/26/96 000283 FIRSTAX (ZRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-2070
3459993 03/24/9~ 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070
36g;~3 03/26/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 14EDICARE 001-2070
369993 03/26/9Z, 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 HEDICARE 100-2070
36~;g3 03/26/W, 000283 FIRSTAX ([RS) 000283 NEDICARE 190-2070
369993 03/26/96 000283 FIRSTAX ([RS) 000283 NEDICARE 191-2070
3~,,,"'~23,03/2~$/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 14F. DICARE 192-2070
3~3 03126/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE lg3-2070
369993 03/26196 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 14EDICARE 280-2070
3699F3 03/26/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 HEDICARE 300-2070
369993 03/26/94 000283 FIRSTAX (]RS) 000283 HEDtCARE 320-2070
369~93 03/26/96 000283 FIRSTAX (]RS) 000283 !tED[CARE
3&gg93 03/2~/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NED[CARE 3/,0-2070
14233 03/24/96 000724 A & R CUSTOH SCREEN PRI PURCHASE T-SHIRTS 190-183-999-5380
1,09~.98
283.36
259.Q6
7.66
8.84,
27.47
14.20
9.15
24.69
10.23
15.67
2,150.12
/,60.6?
20.96
29.50
25 .~&
55.59
15.71
8,(~2.9~
2,878.54
2,178.37
82.55
8.83
245.0~
131
77.87
2~8.27
89.27
2,~2.88
631
577.8~
17.07
19.72
61.20
31.70
20.43
5~.56
22.8~
751.02
5,Z55
18,518.35
751.02
03/24194/, 000573 APOLLO S~EEpING, INC. WEEPING "EHERGENCY RES 100-1b~-999-5~02
130.00
130.00
14235 03/24/9~. 000101 APPLE ONE ~E 3/05/94 280-199-99~-5250 103,20
OV~ 10:59
CITYOF TBIECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VEIl)OR VEIl)OR ITBI ACCOUNT
NLFIER DATE NIllEA IINIE DESCRZPTIOR NUNBER
14236 0~/26/W, 000676 ARBOR-PRO TREE SERVICE RENOVE, GRIND
14737.03/26/~ 000781 ASSOC. OF ENVIRONI~NTAL FEllERSHIP/DAVE HOGNI
001-161-999-5226
14238 03/26/9~ 001072 BANK OF AHERICA MT & SA TCSC CERT. PARTICIPATIO 390-1060
14739 03/26/9~ O00~Z$ BARB'S BALLOONING AFFAI DECORATE CRC 1~)-180-;-5301
14260 03/24/~ OO0402 BERG, IMRK REZli. NENBERSHIP RENEH O01-1&2-999-S22&
14240 03/24/9/, OOO~02 BERG, HARK HE!II. NEHBERSHIP RENEM OO1-162-999-522~
14241 03/26/~, BETA SIGNA PHI-PRECEPTO BETA SIGHA PHI/REFUND lg0-183-69~0
14242 03/24/9/, 000120 RICKNELL TRAVEL CENTER TRAVEL/CONF. APR 12-15 190-180-999-5258
16263 03/24/W, 00133& BIG R & LITTLE T
14243 03124194 001336 BIG R & LITTLE T
142~4 G3/26/96 OO0~75 BN] PUBLICATIORS, INC.
LOH GRN)E 8' RAILROAD T 100-1~-999-5218
TAX 100-1~/,-9~-5218
UNIFORM BUILD CODE
OO1-1&3-~-5228
16265 0~/26/96 000603 .CABLE & HIRELESS CClqltlN FEB. 16-HAR. 15
1~ 03/26/96 000129 CAL HEST RENTAL CENTER EQUIPflINT RENTAL
320-199-999-5208
190-180-~-52~8
14267 03/24/94 001~0 CALIFORNIA BUILDING COD HEHINAR/BUILD INSPECTOR OO1-162-~-52~1
142~8 03/24/94 OO08]7 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TA 000837
14248 03/24/96 OO08~7 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TA 0008~7
FRAN TAX 001-2140
FRAN TAX 100-2140
14269 03/24/94 CASSAitO, KATHLEEN
16250 03/26/96 000489 COBB OROIJP THE
CASSARO/REFUND
C :~05182/SUBSCR Z PT I ON
1~0-18~-4982
320-199-;-5228
16251 03/26/9~ 0011~J COle USA, INC.
16252 03/24/9~ 0O1328 COUNTRY HISTERN DANCE
~OFTHARE
CONTRACT CLASS
320-199-999-5221
190-183-9~-5330
14253 03124194 000155 DAVLIN
AUDIO TAPE; PLANNING 001-161-999-5730
16254 03/24/96 OO1135 FIRST CARE III)USTRIAL N PRE-EIIPLOYHENT PHYSICAL OO1-150-99~-5250
14254 0~/24/94 OO1135 FIRST CARE IliUSTRIAL N DNV PHYSICAL
14255 03/26/96 OOlOO2 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5~7'4Jtt~OT~1OO57/SN
1~.55 03/24Z94 OOlOO2 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5673666603910057/SN
16255 03/24/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE RANK - 56~03910115/JG
14255 03/24/96 OOlOO2 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5~73~03910115/JG
16255 03126196 OOlOO2 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK- 56'7"/,,f,~f~O39101311TE
190-180-999-5250
lOO-180-999-5738
lOO-180-999-5260
OO1-120-999-5258
OO1-120-999-5220
001-162-999-5258
16256 03/26/94 000178 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY SUPPLIES
12''~ 03/24/9/, 000175 GFOA 10~ INFO.
001-161-999-5220
OO1-1M)-999-5228
ITEI4
AI4OlXrr
275 .OO
80.OO
131,778.61.
339.61
65.00
45.OO
lOO.OO
474.00
222.40
17.26
126;30
1,825,63
640.OO
93.96
28.OO
59.OO
54.13
6A9.60
150.00
130.OO
4O.OO
109.69
48.51
667.65
76.39
39.OO
PAGE 2
CHECK
ANOLIT
275.00
131,778.61
339.41
?39.66
126.30
1,825
64.0.OO
187.92
28.OO
59.OO
56.13
64,9.60
150.OO -
178.OO
VOUCHRE2
03/25/94 10:59
CITY OF TBECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NLIIBER
VENDOR
M
ITEH
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITB4
AJ4QUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
16258 03/26/96 000969
14259.03/2~/W, 0001r2
14259 03/24/9~ 000192
16259 03124196 000192
14259 03/24/94 000192
GKN RENTALS
GLOBAL COMPUTER SlJPPLIE
GLONAL COI4PUTER SUPPL]E
GLORAL COIgqJTER SUPPL]E
GLOBAL COI4RJTER SUPPLIE
EOUIP. RENTAL
C2787 HP LASERJET 3St T
C3060 I 3/6 X 1/2 LABEL
FREIGHT
TAX
190-180-999-5258
320-1~9-~q~-5221
320-1~-999-5221
320- W9-~-5221
320-199-99~-5221
600.00
227.98
7.35
8.80:
18.66
600.00
262.79
14260 03/24/94 000711 GRAPHICS UNLINITED LITH ENLARGE HAP
190-180-999-5222
60.3~
60,3~
14261 03/26/94 000186 GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPOR
1426103/24/W, 000184 GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPOR ~)~-d86-1993/HE
162~1 03/26/94 00018/, GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPOR 909-695-35d4
16261 *03/24/94 00018/, GTE CALIFORNIA ]NCORPOR
100-1&~-99~-5208
320-1~9-999-5208
320-W9-999-5208
320-1~9-~j~-5208
16262 03/24/94 001359 HODSON, JACK BOOT REINB. 100-164-~99-5263
301.82
:3~.82
39.07
95.00
616.75
~5.00
16263 0)124194 000190 HOIE BASE
14263 03124/94 000190 HO~E BASE
~39860 COUNTER/SP. PR 190-180-999-5212
MISC. SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5212
301.70
56.10
355.80
162(~4 03/24/94 000194 I(346 RETIREHINT TRUST 6 000194 DEF CORP 001-2080
16266 03126/94 000194 ICHA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 000194 DEF CONP 100-2080
1626~ 03/24/94 000194 ICNA RETIREHINT TRUST 4 000194 DEF CCI4P 190-2080
14266 03/26/94 000194 ICMA RETIRERENT TRUST 4 000194 DEF COILo 191-2080
1426~ 03/26/94 000194 ICNA RETIRERENT TRUST 4 000194 DEF CClIP 193-2,080
16264 03/26/94 000194 ICNA RETIRERENT TRUST 6 000194 DEF CONP 280-2080
16264 03/24/94 000194 ]CNA RETIRERENT TRUST 6 000194 DEF CCMP 300-2080
14264 03/24/94 000194 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST A 000194 DEFCOHP 340-2080
14265 03/24/94 001340 INNOVATIVE ZHAGES COLOR CHARGE/SP BOTTLES 190-180-999-5301
1,393.17
534.82
496.96
34.08
61.66
5.00
25.37
50.00
35.00
2,601.06
35.00
14266 03/24/94 001358 INSTITUTE FOR CONTINUIN SEMINAR/IJORK. CONP. 001-150-;-5261
170.00
170.00
14267 03124194 000206
14268 03124196 000596
14269 03/24/94 001030
16269 03/24/94 001030
'162~ 03/26/W, 001030
16270 03126194 000228
16270 03/26/94 000228
16270 03/26/94 000228
14270 03/26/94 000228
16271 03/24/94 001213
14272 03/26/94 001363
16273 03/24/94 000259
16273 03/24/94 000259
KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I
LEAGUE OF CA CITIES/LAF
MINI'GRAPHIC SYSTEMS, I
MINI'GRAPHIC SYSTENS, I
MINI-GRAPHIC SYSTEMS, I
MISC. PRINTING SERVICES
SEMINAR APR. 13-15
MISC. SUPPLIES
MISC. SUPPLIES
MISC. SUPPLIES
:330-19~-~9~-5220
190-180-99~-5258
001-120-99~-5250
001-120-9f9-5250
001-120-~-5250
MOBIL FULE/TS 100-164-999-5243
MOBIL FUELIE 001-110-99~-5263
MOBIL FUEL/TE 001-162-999-5263
MOBIL FUEL/B&S 001-162-~9-5263
OIL POLICE CYCLE
APPLICATION FEE
UE 02/20
UE 01/16/94
MURRIETA ROTORSPORTS
NATIONAL CIVIC LEAGUE
OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC
OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC
001-170-~-5216
190-180-99~-5256
001-162-999-51i8
001-1~.-999-5119
21 .~
873.00
273.20
238.02
11,68
17,~8
12 ,~0
8.51
350.00
291.20
73.27
21
8/5.00
534.01
81.0a
8.51
350.00
PAGE
10:59
CiTY OF TEtECULA
VOUCHF. It/CIECICREGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VQIJCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUIiER DATE NIJIIR
NAIIE
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCCXJNT
NUI4BER
ITEM
ANOUNT
CHECK
NIXIT
1427~ 0:5124194 OIX)Z~9
14273 03124194 000239
14273 0~124194 000239
14273 0312/,194 000239
14,273 03/24,/94 0002J9
14273 0'5/24/94, 000239
14,27/* 03/24,/94 001160
14,273 03124,194 0002~6
14273 03124194 00026,6
14,273 03124194 0002/,6
14,273 0:5124,194 0002~6
14,273 03/24,/94 0002~6
1/.273 03/2/*/94, 0002/,6
1/.275 03/24,/94, 0002/6
1/,273 03/24,/94 0002/,6
14,273 03124,194 0002~6
14,275 03/24,/94 000241
14,273 03/24,/94, 0002~6
14,273 03/24,/94 0002~6
14,.~''~,. 0~/24/94 0002/,6
14 03/24,/94 000246
142~ 03/24,/94 0002~6
1/.275 03/24,/94 0002~6
1/.275 03/2/*/94 0002/,6
14,275 03/2/*/94 00024,6
14,273 03/24,/94 00024,6
14,275 03/2A/94, 0002/,6
1/.273 03/2/*/94' 0002/.6
14,275 0)/24,/94, 00024,6
14,275 0)/2/*/94 0002/*6
14,273 03/24,/94 0002~6
OLSTEN TBIN31IARY SIRtiC
OLSTEN TBIN3RARY SERVIC
OLSTEN TEIIP(XIARY PELVIC
OLSTEN TENPOeJ~Y IBVlC
O~STEN TENPOIIARY SERVIC
OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC
PACTEL CELLULAR-LA
PERS ENPLOYEES' RETIRE!t
PERS BIPLOYEES, RETIREM
PERS ENPLOYEES' PETIREN
PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REM
PERS EMPLOYEES' PETIREM
PERS EMPLOYEES' PETItEM
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRBI
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM
PERS BIPLOYEES' GETIREII'
PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETZREM
PERS EHPLOYEES' ItETZItEII
PERS ENPLOYEES' RETZREN
PERS EIIPLOYEES' RETIRBI
PERS BIPLOYEES' PETIRB!
PERS BIPLOYEE$' RETZREII
PERS EIFLOYEES' RETIRBI
PERS EIFLOYEES' RETIRBI
PERS BFLOYEES' RETIRBI
PERS BFLOYEES' RETZREH
PERS EIFLOYEES' PETEREll
PERS EIFLOYEES' RETIRBI
PERS EIfLOYEES' RETIRe
PERS EIfLOYEES' RETIREM
Ii 01/16
k'E 01/23/9~
I,~ 01/30/94,
tE 02/06
lIE 02/13
I,E 02/27
LA6015202/TH
0002~6 . PER REDE
000Z~6 PER REDE
00024~ PERS PET
0002~6 PERS PET
0002/~ PERS PET
0002&6 PERS PET
0002/,6 PERS RET
0002&6 PERS RET
00024,6 PERS GET
0002/,6 PERS RET
0002&6 PERS RET
00024,6 PERS RET
0002/,6 PERS RET
0002~6 SURVIVOR
0002/*6 SURVIVOR
000266 SURVIVOR
00024,6 SURVIVOR
0002~6 SURVIVOR
0002/,6 SURVIVOR
0002~6 SURVIVOR
0002~6 SURVIVOR
00024~ SURVIVOR
0002~6 SURVIVOR
0002~6 SURVIVOR
001-162-999-5116
· 001 - 162-999-5118
001-162-999-5118
001-162-999-5118
001-162-999-5118
001-162-999-5118
320-199-999-5208
001-2130
100-2130
001 -Z590
190-Z~0
191-2:~0
~0-2~0
~z~O-2:~O
1~0-2:~0
192-2~90
1F~-2:~)0
~/*0-~0
~5.~
2~ .M
71.73
107.35
107.35
10,131.19
2,~3.~
~.57
2~.39
155.58
234,.01
194.~
/.7.11
12.31
13.~
1.~
.56
.~6
1.86
2,238.6O
71
16,813.84.
1/.216 03124,194, 00024.8
1/.276 0312/.194, 00024,8
14,276 03124,194, 00024,8
1/,276 03124,194, 00024,8
14,276 03/2/*/94, 0002/,8
PETROLANE
PETROLANE
PETROLAME
PETROLANE
PETROLANE
FUEL
DOUBLE HEAD lit. HEATER
TAX
10 GAL PROPANE TANKS
TAX
100-16/,-999-52d3
100-16A-999-5242
100-16&-999-52/.2
100-164-999-52/.2
100-164-999-52&2
19.68
263.90
20
110.4,6
8.56
14,277 0312/.19/* 0002/*9
1/.277 03124,194 0002/*9
14277 0312/.194 000249
14277 0312/.194 0002/*9
14,277 03/2/*/94 0002/*9
14,277 O3/2/*/94 OOO2/*9
14,277 O3/2/*/94 OOO2/*9
14,277 03/24,/94 OOO2/*9
14,277 03/2/*/9/* 0002~9
:,~z. 03/2/*/94 000249
03/2/*/9/* 0002/*9
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
001-199-/*070
001-1~0-999-5258
001 - 1/,0-999-5260
001-110-9q9-5260
100-183-999-5320
001-163-999-5261
190-180-999-5220
320-199-999-52/d
001-16.'5-999-5260
190-181-999-5301.
190-180-999-5~01
21 .QQ
35.14
35.16
/*.32
25.89
VOUCHRE2 PAG~
03125194. 10: 59
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
14277
14.278
14.278
1~278
14.279
14.279
14280
14.285
14.285
14286
14.287
14290
14292
CHECK
DATE
03124.194.
03124/94
03124.194
03124194
03/~/94
03/~/94
03124194
03/24/94
03/24./94
03/24/94
03/24/94
03/24/94
03124194
03124.194
03124194
03124194
03124194
03124.194
03124194
03124.194
03/24/94.
03124/94
03124.194
03124./94
03/24./94
03124/94
NUNlEA
000249
O0O253
00O253
000253
00O253
OOO253
000253
000254
000254
000P_54
001015
001015
001015
001015
000992
O00f~7
00094>7
000~
000~07
000~07
0004.26
0004.26
0004.26
0004.26
00O836
001365
000269
000269
0OO28O
0OO28O
O01122
0004.03
OOO385
M
PETTY CASH
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
POSTItRSTER
POSTIIASTER
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COI~AN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COlePAN
PIESS-ENTERPRISE COlePAN
PROGRAIE) FOB SUCCESS,
PROGRAIIED FCI SUCCESS,
PROGRAIED FOR SUCCESS,
PRDGRNIIED FOR SUCCESS,
RAMONA TIRE, INC.
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHOCALIFORNIAIMTER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER
RANCHO CAR MASH
RANCHO CAR MASH
RANCNO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
RANCND INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
RANCHO NUFFLER SPECIALI
RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPART
RIVERS]DE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
SC SIGNS
SC SIGNS
SCOTCH PAINT CORPORATIO
SHAMi SCOTT POOL & SPA
SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO
SHELDGN EXTINGUISHER CO
SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO
CITY OF TEIECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PETTY CASH
POSTAGEIHR
POSTAGE/PLAN
I~TAGE/CC
POSTAGE/CH
POSTAGE/CC
PO~TAGEIIN
JOB ANNCUNCEIENTS
JON ANNOUNCERENT
JOB ANNOUNCEIENT
FACILITY USE PEWIITS-IO
REGISTRATION RECEIPTS -
FREIGHT
TAX
TIRE BALANCE
NISC. COPIES
NISC. COPIES
01/20-02/17
01/20-02/17
MASH/B&S
k~H/l~a
JANITONIAL SUPPLIES
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
SENION SUPPLIES
MISC, SUPPLIES
REPAIR BASE NOUNT
PLAN CHECK
SIGNATURE PLATE; NEU Cl
TAX
SIGNS
JAN POSTING FEE
PAINT ROLLERS, NISC.
POOL MAINTENANCE FEB.94
DRY CIEMICAL POM)ER
SF. ItVICE ON 2 1/2 LB & 5
TAX
ACCOUNT
NtRER
190-180-999-5222
001-150-999-5250
001 - 161-999-5250
330-199- 999 - 5230
001 - 11 O- 999-5250
001 - 120-999-5250
001-163-999-5230
001-150-999-5254.
190-180-999-5254.
001-150-999-5254.
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-i8O-999-5E0
310-1d4,-;-5214.
001-166-999-5423
001-161-999-5224.
193-180-999-5240
190-180-999-524.0
310-162-;-5214.
310-1~,.-;-5214.
190-180-999-5212
340-199-999-5212
190-181-999-5212
100-180-999-5212
100-164-999-5215
210-190-136-5802
001-14.0-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-120-999-5244
190-180-999-5244
100-164-999-5218
190-180-999-5212
3/,0-199-999-5212
340-199-999-5212
340-199-999-5212
ITEN
MIOUMT
19.90
29.85
9.95
9.95
19.90
9.95
169.75
228.76
24,4.61
34.0.00
390.00
29.57
52.93
103.42
135.76
184.52
1,278.4.1
121.4.0
16.00
~.~
115.&8
~0.30
77.8~
72.13
41.16
700.00
04..OO
6.51
135.00
45.00
2.39
103.20
8.75
15.00
.68
CHECK
ANOUNT
99.50
643.12
'812.50
32~"~
1,399.81
305.80
4.1.16
90.51
180.00
2.39
103.20
0)V~ CITY OF TENECULA
10:59 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOG ALL PERlOGS
PAGE
V(XJCHER/
CHECK: CHECK VEIl)OR VENI)OG ZTB! ACC(X.NT
NLI4BER DATE ~R RAI4E DESCRIPTIOG NUMBER
ITB4
mT
CHECK
16293 03/26/9~ 001361 SHOOS.aN, RICHARD P. JAZZ CONCERT
1629~ 03/26/9~ 00043~ SIERRA COIFUTER SYSTEMS SIERRA COGF./TA
190-18:5-999-5370
001 - 162-999-5261
875.00
175.00
16295 03/Z6/9~ 000285 SIR SPEEDY 1000; TBIECULA POLICE D 001-170-999-5220
16295 03/26/96 000285 SIR SPEEDY 500; TEHECULA POLICE DE 001-170-999-5220
16295 0)124194 000285 SIR SPEEDY TAX 001-170-999-5720
63.26
37.11
7.78
108.15
16296 03/26/9~ 000704 SIS, INC./INLAND OIL FUELIB&S 001-162-999-5263
16296 0)12619/, 000706 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL/TCSD 190-180-999-5263
16296 0)12619/, 00070~ SES, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL/PV 100-1d4-999-5263
39.89
148.55
:342.56
531.00
14297 03/24/9~ 001:362 SHITH, HAL JAZZ CONCERT 190-183-999-5370
16298 0)/26/96 000376 SIX/TERN CALIF EDISON 2/03-0)/07 190-180-9~9-5260
700.00
3,542.69
70O.OO
3,562.69
16294) 03/24/96 000926 SOUTHERN CAL[F EDZSOII TEMPORARY POI,ER/LIEFER 210-166-627-58N,
337.00
337. O0
14300 0)126196 001212 SOUTHERN CALIFOGNIA GAS 2115-3/17
190-180-999-5260
588.56
588.56
1630103/Z6/94 000375 S(XrrHERN CALIFOGNIA TEL 9092026751/TS
1(r~03/26/9~ 000375 SOUTHERN CAL[FOGNIA TEL 909-202-6752 Se
1~ !03/26/9~ 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFOGNIA TEL 909-202-4761/Sl4
1630103/26/9~ 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFOGNIA TEL 909-202-5153 GY
100-16~-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
001 - 100-999- 5208
001-110-999-5208
16302 03/26/96 000576 SUPER TONER HP-]I-lll LAHERJET CART 320-199-999-5221
16302 03/26/96 000576 SUPER TONER TAX 320-199-999-5221
59.76
97.87
139.33
112.85
400.79
5~).36
14303 03124194 000905 TENECULA SHUTTLE SERVIC TCSD STAFF/AIRPORT 190-180-999-5258
100.00
100.00
14304 03/24/94 000515 TEMECULA VALLEY CMER SECRETARY LUNCHEON 001-160-999-5200
10.00
10.00
14305 03/24/(~ 001022 THOISPSOIi PUBLISHING OGO SUBSCRIPTION
16306 03/24/9/, 000319 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. REPLACEMENT DIGGING TEE
14306 03/26/9~ 000319 TOIIAItK SPORTS, INC. FREIGHT
14306 03/26/96 000319 TONARK SPORTS, INC. TAX
001 ' 150'999'5228
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
219.00
270.00
8.26
20.93
219.00
299.19
14307 03/24/9~ Q(X)320 TME CENTER STATIC)HERS OFFICE SUPPLIES
16307 03/24/9~ 000)20 TOMliE CENTER STATIONERS MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
16307 03/26/9~ 000~20 TOlalE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES
001-163-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
57.02
18.45
16.56
92.03
16308 03/26/9/, 000)25 UNITED HAY OF THE INLAN 000325 IN
1~38 03/24/94 000325 UNITED kVkY OF THE INLAN 000325 LIB
14308 03/26/9~ 000325 UNITED HAY OF THE [NLAN 000325
16308 03/26/9~ 000~25 UNITED 14AY OF THE ZNLAN 000325
001-2120
100-2120
190-2120
280-2120
78.85
1.05
17.00
.00
97.50
1/,309 0)/24/96 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNIFOIN RENT 100-16&-999-5263
16309 0)/24/94 000326 tillTOG RENTAL SERVICE UNIFOIU4 RENTAL 190-180-999-5263
lzkwt 0)/24/9/, 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE FLCX)R HATS FOG CITY HAL 3/,0-199-999-5250
25.00
16.10
34.50
73.6O
VOUCHRE2
031~196
VOUCHER/
CHECK
N~ER
14310
1~310
14310
14310
14310
14311
14311
14311
14312
14313
14313
14314
10:59
CHECK
DATE
03/2~,/94
03/24/94
03/24/94
03124194
03/24/9A
03124194
03/24/9~
03124194
03124194
0312419~
HUNGER
~1~5
001~5
~1065
~1~5
001~5
000335
000820
OOO820
00034,8
VENDOR
NH
U$CM/PEB$CO (DEF. C(IF.
USCX/PEBSCO (DEF. COle.
USCMIPEBSCO (DEF.
USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. CCKo.
USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. COMP.
US~/KBSOD, (~)
USCM/PEBSCO, (~)
USCM/PEBSCO, CO81tA)
WESTERN CiTY NAGAZINE
WINCHAK, KRIS
UINCHAK, IOtlS
Z]GLER, GAZL
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CliCK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
001065 DEF C(NP
001065 DEF C~P
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COI4P
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
ADVERTISEHINT FOR CITY
MORICERS CONP/NARCH 94
PROF. SERV.
REFRESINENTS CRC
ACCOUNT
tlUI~ER
001-2080
100-2080
190-2080
300-2080
320-2080
001-2160
100-2160
190-2160
0O1-150-999-5254
001-1182
190-180-999-5250
190-180-9~9-5260
iTEN
ARCUIT
7,641.01
197.98
156.32
3.46
313.35'
107.14
96.00
141.52
622.00
101.58-
1,050.00
400.00
PN:r'~7
CHECK
8,312.12
344.66
622.00
948.42
400.0O
TOTAL CHECKS
214,214.86
11:~5
CITY OF TBIECULA
VOUCHER/CHEClCREGZ$1'ER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FINd) TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 COI4NUNITY SERVZCES DISTRICT
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL [NPROVEHENT PROJ FUND
250 CAPZTAL PROJECTS - TCSD
280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - C]P
300 [NStJRANCE/FIJND
320 [NFOR:HATZON SYSTEI4S
330 COPY CENTER FUND
3/+0 FACILZTEES
TOTAL
JT
13,147.06
22,525.7'0
7,&00.54~
16,003.21
1,956.20
5,760.00
2,678.05
1,526.29
18,780.30
2,0&1.21
6,&96.Z3
VOUCHRE2
03/25/9~
11:45
CiTY OF TE!4E~ULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUIIER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
iTEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUHBER
ITEM
AHOUNT
CHECK
AHOUNT
14318
14318
14318
1618
0~/05/94
04/05/~
04105194
04105194
001281
001281
001281
00 1281
ALMRA GROUP
ALHAIIRA GROUP
ALHAMBRA GROUP
ALHAMBRA GROUP
SN4 HICKS PARK
REZMEURSABLES FOR P.O.
ADDT'L DRAWING
LOll LINDA PARK/PH 2
280'199'805-5802
'210'190'134-5802
210-190-134-5802
210-190-134- 5802
2,678.05
250.00
1,350.00
131.20
4,409.25
16319
14319
' 16319
14319
14319
1619
14319
041051~
0410519~
041051~
041051~
04/05/~
041051~
041051~
000131
000131
000131
0OO131
OOO131
000131
000131
CARL WARREN & CO:, INC.
CARL MARREN & CO., INC.
CARL MARREN & CO., INC.
CARL MARREN & CO., iNC.
CARL WARREN & CO., iNC.
CARL MARREN &CO., INC.'
CARL WARREN & CO., INC.
LOSS 6/211;r~/HASK
LOSS 01/29/93/IUINTEK
LOSS 4/'~/~/JAIICAR
LOSS 8/25193/THOMPSON
LOSS 02/01/91/YRAGER
0~/10/~/ED i SUM
LOSS 9/21/;~/Ne~rrEN
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
300-1999-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
377.63
232.25
186.00
175.50
175.63
115.15
266.13
1,526.29
14320
14320
1620
14320
14321
14322
14322
14322
1622
041051~
04105194
04105194
041051~
041051~.
04105194
041051~4
04105194
041051~
000135
000135
000135
000135
000754
001056
001056
001056
001056
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
MlSC. HARDMARE FOR SIGN
MISC. HARDUARE FOR SIGN
MISC. HARDMARE FOR SIGN
MiSt. HARDMARE FOR SIGN
LANDSCAPE REVIEW
LANDSCAPE NAINT.
LANDSCAPE NRINT.
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
LANDSCAPE MAINT.
100-164-999-52~
100-1~4-999-524~
100-164-~-52~4
100-1~4-999-52~4
001-161-999-5250
lf3-180-999-5415
193-180-~-5415
190-180-999-5250
1~3-180-~-5415
969.75
140.08
145 .~6
1,260.00
4,295.00
405.97
6,877.81
11,302.24
1,354.53
1,260.00
22,881.02
14323
163~
14324
14324
14324
1624
14324
14324
14324
14324
14324
1624
14324
14324
14324
1624
'1624
14325
14325
14326
14326
1626
1626
04/05/~
041051~
04105194
04105/94
O4105194
04105194
04105194
04105194
041051~
04105194
041051~
04105194
04105194
04105194
04105194
0~/05/94
0410519~
041051~
0410519~
04105194
04105194
04105194
041051~,
000712
000712
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
0OO177
000177
000177
0OO177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000202
000202
OOO226
0O0226
0OO226
OOO226
FORD, STEVEN J.
FORD, STEVEN J.
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFiCE PRCl)UCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFiCE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNZES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNiES OFFICE PRODUCT
J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATE
J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATE
MICRO AGE COHPUTER CENT
MICRO AGE CCIIPUTER CENT
NIORO AGE COMPUTER CENT
MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT
PROFESSIORAL SERV. MAR. 250-100-129-5804
PROFESSIONAL SERV./FEB 250-190-129-580~
MiSt. OFFICE PRODUCTS
AOP-302 iNSTA'PLAQUE AW
TAX
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
MXSC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
NISC. SUPPLIES
MiSt. OFFICE PRODUCTS
NISC. OFFiCE PRODUCTS
MiSt. OFFICE PROOUCTS
001-140-~-5220
190-180-~9~-5220
1~0-180-f99-5220
100-180-~-5220
1~0-180-999-5220
001-110-~9-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
SAF-408~; 10 X 2 314 TW 340-199-999-5242
TAX 340-199-~-5242
MISC. OFFICE PRODUCTS 001-140-999-5220
OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-100-999-5220
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-140-~-5220
M]SC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5220
VIDEO PROJECTOR RENTAL 210-1~0-137-5802
DESIGN SERVICES 001-163-;-5250
STORAGE DIHENSIORS TAPE 320-19fi
TAX 320-1970
STORAGE DIHENSZORS 2.16 320-1970
TAX 320-1970
1,660.00
4,100.00
7.56
386.25
29.93
95.0O
1.21'
27.42
17.72
8.32
15.11
34.53
10.34
193.20
35.8~
225.00
7,700.00
8,4:~9.00
653.25
7,620.00
59O.55
5,760.00
1,451.37
7,~25.00
17,2~
03V~ PAGE 2
11
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUllER
1/,327
1/,327
1/,327
1/,328
1/,328
1/,329
16329
14330
1/,330
1/,330
1/,331
1/,332
1/,332
1,rk3:32
14332
1/332
1Lx3~
1/,333
CHECK
DATE
0410519/,
04/05/O4
0410519/*
0/*10519/*
0/*1051O4
0~1051O4
lY, I051O4
0/*10519/*
04/05/9~
0/*/05/~
0/*1051O4
041051O4
0/*1051O4
0/*1051O4
04,10519/*
0/*1051O4
VENDOR
NUIIER
00O883
000883
000883
000437
001007
001007
0002/*0
OOO2/*O
0002/*0
000513
000302
000302
000302
000302
OOO302
000302
000302
000302
000332
000332
0003/*5
000..~5
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VEIl)OR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
M DESCRIPTION NUIgER AMOUNT
liMTELEONE EXCAVATING
NONTELEONE EXCAVATING
HONTELEONE EXCAVATING
NOItELAND &ASSOCIATES
HOMELAND &ASSOCIATES
NPG CORP.
NPG CORP.
ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING
ORANGE _t~__NTY STRIPING
ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING
SIII40NS, BECKY MCLEAN .
SYSTEM SOIJRCE, INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE, INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE, INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE, INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE, INC.
SYSTEM SOIJRCE, INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE, INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE, INC.
VANDORPE CHOU A$SOCIATI
VANDORPE CHOU AS$OCIATI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
10 itS. IILRDE MORK
REMOVAL OF DEBRIS
RENCNAL OF DEBRIS
100-1,';4-999-5/*02
100-16/*-9~-5/*01
lOO-1(~.-999-5/*01
TOT-TRNISlEMT OCCUPANCY OO1-14~)-999-5248
SEMINAR/,/12/9~ OO1-1/,0-999-5260
ORDER 193-O4-80 lOO-164-999-5/*02
"EMERGENCY" TRENCH REPA lOO-164-999-5/,02
RESTRIPING
STRIPING SERVICE
STRIPING SERVICE
lOO-16/*-999-5/,10
lOO-16~-999-5410
100-16~-999-5~10
' TRA I N ! NG 320-199-999- 5250
OPTION Ill QUOTE FOR PU 340-1960
SERV iCE 340 - 1960
TAX 340-1960
PFF 3060T; TABLE DESK 3 3~0-1960
PFF 24~0T; TABLE DESK 2 340-1960
PF2072TlaC; TANLE DESK 2 340-1960
SERVICE; MOVE PEDESTAL, 344)-1960
TAX 340-1960
PLAN CHECK FEES
PLAN CHECK SERV. lIAR.
OO1-162-~-52~8
001-162-999-52~8
liTER USAGE
lITER USAGE
330-1~-999-5~9
330-1~-999-5~9
1,100.00
970.OO
950.00
1,500.71
?5.OO
2,350.OO
2,100.00
5,635.81
7,610.36
/*55.00
1,4.87.50
2,767.00
1,960.00
21/*.47
3OO.OO
372.OO
421 .OO
70.OO
91.69
1,523.39
369.39
968.40
1,072.81
CHECK
ANOUNT
3,020.OO
1,575.71
4,450.00
13,701.17
1/,87.50
6,286.16
2,O41.21
TOTAL CHECKS
~6,31/*.7~
ITEM
NO.
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
· AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM:
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
DATE:
April 5, 1994
SUBJECT:
City Treasurer's Report as of February 28, 1994
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's
report as of February 28, 1994..
DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment
portfolio and receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government
Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in
compliance with the Code Sections as of February 28, 1994.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
1. City Treasurer's Report as of February 28, 1994
2. Schedule of Fund Balances as of February 28, 1994
~ of Tern
As of F®brumy 28, 1994
Cash Activity for the Month of Februmy:
Cash and Investments as of February 1, 1994
Cash Receipts
Cash Disbursements
Cash and Investments as of F®brumy 28, 1994
$
$
41,758,479
(3,027,608)
41,177,451
Cash and Investments Portfolio:
Type of Investment
Petty Cash
General Checking
Benefit Demand Deposits
Local Agency Investment Fund
Deferred Compensation Fund
Deferred Compensation Fund
Defined Contribution Fund
Trust Accounts-TCSD COPs
Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds
Institution
City Hall
Fimt Interstate
First Interstate
State Treasurer
ICMA
PEBSCO
PEB,SCO
Bank of America
Bank of America
Ykid
4.176%
2.880%
2.880%
Balance
800
330,538
6,192
27,376,386
258,997
204,847
16,870
681,180
12,301,641
41,177,451
(1)
(1)
(1)-This amount is net of outstanding checks.
Per Government Code Requirements, this Treasurer's Report is in compliance with
the City of Temecula's investment policy and them are edequ-te funds available
to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next
thirty days.
Prepared by Tim McDermott, Senior Accountam
City of Temecula
Schedule of Fund Balances
As of February 28, 1994
Total Assets $
Less: Liabilities
Total Fund Balances
Less: Reserved Amounts (1)
Less: Designated Amounts (2)
Unreserved, Undesignated
Fund Balances $
Cortlrtlunity
Services Redevelopment
City District Agency Total
24,331,133 $ 3,306,387 $ 19,605,322 $ 47,242,892
3,037,694 540,211 457,950 4,035,855
21,293,489 2,766,176 19,147,372 43,207,037
5,245,146 1,050,758 5,814,182 12,110,086
8,752,566 1,715,418 13,333,190 23,801,174
7,295,777 $ 0 $ 0 $ 7,295,777
(1) Includes mounts reserved for encumbrances, land held for resale, long-term notes receivable, Iowlmod housing,
and debt service.
(2) Includes mounts designated for economic uncertainty, debt service, and continuing appropriations.
ITEM 5
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~~,
FINANCE OFFICER '
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:+
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AOENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Rick Sayre, Police Chief
April 5, 1994
Expenditure of Asset Forfeiture Funds
RECOMMENDATION: City Council authorize staff to use police asset forfeiture funds to
purchase computer equipment.
BACKGROUND: Criminal narcotic investigations where monies are seized can be obtained by
law enforcement agencies. Currently the City of Temecula Police Department has $5,000.00
available for use. The monies seized must be used for law enforcement programs.
I recommend the funds be used to purchase three computers end eight local area network,
(L.A.N.), cards for use at the Police Department. The computers will be used as follows:
* Traffic Team,
* Shift Sergeant,
* Patrol Officer Report Writer.
The L.A.N. cards will be intalled in eight. existing computers, linking them onto the Police
Department L.A.N. The Police Department serves as the City Hall backup information
management system in the event of a disaster effecting City Hall.
FISCAL IMPACT: None. Funds are accrued by Riverside County Sheriff and are used as
needed.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Quote for equipment requested.
,S~,'T BY: 2-24-84; 8:4751; CITY OF TEMECbLA-. 714eiB44367;;~ 1/1
CIFY OF T~M~CUIA
~V~XMORANDUM
I~XOM:
SUBJECT:
Rick Sayer, Chief of Polics
~°t~om Haleli, Informsimon System. Administrstor
Computer Equ(pment Rtqutst
DATE:
February :24, 1994
WnltK,qlTATIt~N
486DX-33MHZ VBSA EA 1,310 $3,930
256K CACHE _ko~MORY
4MB RAM (BXPANDABLB TO 32MB)
MINI TOW!~ CASE W/2~0~ WATI UL POWER SUPPLY
1.4 TEA(] PLOPPY DI~WB
210MB IDE HARD DRIVB (18ms MIN)
I6BIT IDE CONTROLLER 2S/IP/IG PORT
16B1T SVOA ADAYlXR
101 ENHAN~ KEYBOARD
MIC~OSOFr Smua~ MOUn
l_~nrf 10BAS~F HIGH PEXFOItMANCI~ ~t~v-~qET CARD
SVGA COLOR MONITOR .28 W/TILT & SWIVEL BASB
MSDOS 6.2
ONE YBAR PARTS AND LABOR WARRANTY
8
16X~vT 10BASEF ItlGH PBRI~ORMANCE ErHERNEF CARD
EA 5S S440
TAX $ 338.68
ITEM NO. 6
· APPROVAl
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Council/City Manager
/f~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
April 5, 1994
SUBJECT: Final Tract Map No. 27690
PREPARED ~iim D. Faul, Assistant Engineer - Land Development
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve Final Tract Map No. 27690 subject to the Conditions of
Approval.
BACKGROUND:
Tentative Tract Map No. 27690, Amendment No. 1, was approved by the City of Temecula
Planning Director, Gary Thornhill, on March 11, 1994. The Developer has met ell of the
Conditions of Approval.
Final Tract Map No. 27690 is a one (1) lot commercial subdivision, for condominium purposes,
of 1.02 acres located on the northerly side of Winchester Road (Hwy 79 North) at the
intersection of Ynez Road. 'The site is currently occupied by a medical office building.
Surrounding land uses include vacant land and commercial development. The site is zoned
Scenic Highway Commercial (C-P-S). The established zoning on the property conforms with
the land use designation on the General Plan for the City of Temecula.
The existing drainage facilities at the intersection of Winchester Road (Highway 79 North) and
Ynez Road were reviewed and found to be inadequate to support additional development
(Condition No. 35). The existing drainage facilities will need to be upeized as additional
development occurs along the north side of Winchester Road. An Agreement for Payment of
Drainage Improvement Fees will be recorded concurrently with Final Tract Map No. 27690 and
similar agreements will be required for each contributing property as they are developed.
c~gd~t~e4~406~TR27e~O/eke
The following fees have been paid for Final Tract Map No. 27690:
Area Drainage Fees
Public Facilities Fee
Traffic Signal Mitigation Fees
Paid prior to grading permit (Cond. No. 42)
Paid prior to building permit (Cond. No. 78)
Paid prior to building permit (Cond. No. 74)
The Agreement for Payment of Drainage Improvement Fees will be recorded concurrently with
Final Map 27690 and a bond of 820,000 will be posted for this developer's fair share of
drainage improvements.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMI:NT8:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Development Fee Checklist
Project Location Map
Final Tract Map No. 27690
Conditions of Approval
Fees & Securities Report
Agreement for Payment of Drainage 'Improvement Fee
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO.: Tract MAD No. 97690
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this
project.
FEE
Flood Control (ADP)
Public Facility
Traffic Signal Mitigation
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Paid prior to grading permit
(Condo No. 42)
'Paid prior to building permit
(Cond. No. 78)
Paid prior to building permit
(Cond. No. 74)
Fire Mitigation N/A
Quimby N/A
SITE
~CINITY .;. MaP
N.T.S.
SEC. 35, '1'7S, R3W, S.B.B.M.
Plannina Department
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PA92-O036, Tentative Tract Map No. 27690,
Amendment No. I
Project Description: Approval for a condominium
map .for a 9,635 ,~quare foot medical office
building~ ·
Assessor's Parcel No.: 910-110-057
Approval Date: March 11, 1993
Expiration Date: March 11, 1995
The use hereby permitted by this approval is for medical offices.
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold h~rmless the City of Temecula, its
agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or proceeding against the City
of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul,
an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative
body concerning PA92-0036. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the permittee
of any such claim, action, or pro~:eeding against the City of Temecula and will
cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly· notify the permittee of any
such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in 'the defense, the
permittee shall not,' thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless
the City of Temecula.
The. development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as shown on
Plot Plan No. PA92-0036 marked Exhibit A, or as amended by these conditions.
Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
The applicant shall comply with the Public Works Department's Conditions of Approval
which are included herein.
Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the
provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal dated
December 10, 1992, a copy of which is attached. --
Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Rood.
Control District's transmittal dated December 31, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
R:I~"~'TAR=Nrr~6PAI2.DH 3/15/93 klb
e
10.
11.
12.
-13.
14.
15.
Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the appropriate section of
Ordinance No, 546 and the County Fire Warden's transmittal dated December 17,
1992, a copy of which is attached,
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Building and
Safety Department transmittal dated December 10, 1992, a c~}py of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in-the Department of
.Transportation transmittal dated December 22, 1992, q copy of which is .attached,
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho Water.
District transmittal dated December 23, 1992, a copy of which is attached,
Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, three {3) copies of a Parking,
Landscaping, Irrigation, and Shading Plans shall be submitted to the Planning'
Department for approval, The location, number, genus, species, and container size of
the plants shall be shown, Plans shall meet all requirements of Ordinance No, 348,
Section 18, 12, and shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee,
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape,
irrigation, and shading plans prior to the issuance of occupa.ncy permits, An automatic
sprinkler system shall .be installed and all landscaped areas shall be maintained in a
viable growth condition, Planting within ten (10) feet of an entry or exit driveway shall
not be permitted to grow higher than thirty {30) inches,
A minimum of 59 parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.12,
Riverside County Ordinance No. '348. Fifty-nine (59) parking spaces shall be provided
as shown on the Approved Exhibit A. The parking area .shall be surfaced with
asphaltic concrete paving to a minimum depth of 3 inches on 4 inches of Class II base.
A minimum of three (3) handicapped pa.rking spaces shall be provided as shown on
Exhibit A. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a
permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on st. eel, beaded text
or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be
smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the
parking space at a minimum. height if 80 inches from the 'bottom Of the sign to the
parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the
parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. 'A sign shall also be posted in a
conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17
inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or
license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be
towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be
reclaimed at or by ...telephone
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at
least 3 square feet in size,
R:%S~qTAFFRPT~BPA92.DH 3116/93 klb
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
A Plot Plan application for a Sign Program shall be submitted and approved by the
Planning Director prior to occupancy. -- --
Building elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown 'on Exhibit B.
Materials used in the construction of all buildings shall be in substantial conforrnance
with that shown on Exhibit C (Color 'Bevations), Exhibit D (Materials Board) and the
following:
a. ~;tucco walls on wood 'frame - La Habra Stucco X-16 'Silver Grey"
b. Stucco Trim - La Habra Stucco X-50 'Crystal White"
Stucco Columns - 32" Square, Silver Grey with Crystal White base and capital
trim, typical.
.d.
Concrete Tile Roofing - Lifetile 'Super Shake' #503 'Charcoal Blend"
Rain Gutter - Metal, painted white to match trim
Store Front - ':-'h~*.= Teal Aluminum Mullions (Amended at Planning Director
Hearing on March 11, 1993) · ."
g.. Glazing - Solar Grey
Canopy - Quarter Tound architectural fabric: "Teal"
Roof-mounted equipment shall be architecturally screened from ground view. '
All trash enclosures shall be constructed prior to the issuance of occupancy permits.
Each enclosure shall be six feet in height and shall be made with masonry block and
a steel gate which screens the bins-from external view.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with Ordirance No.
663 by paying.the fee required by that ordinance which is based on (the gross acreage
of the parcels proposed for development} (the number of single family residential units
on lots which ere · minimum of one-half (1/2) gross acre in size). Should Ordinance
No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the
payment of the fees required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee
required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or
resolution.
Four (4) Class II bicycle racks shall be pro~/ided in convenient locations as approved by
the Planning Director to facilitate bicycle access to the project area.'
Prior to the issuance of building permits, performance securities, in amounts to be
determined by the Director of Building and Safety to guarantee the installation of
plantinge, walls, and fences in accordance with the approved plan, and adequate.
maintenance of the Planting for one year, shall be filed with the Department of Building
and Safety.
R:%S%STAFFRPT'~BPAI2.DI.I 311 6/93 klb
Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions/Reciprocal AcceSs Easements:
24. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be reviewed and approved
by the Planning Department pdor to recordation. The CC&R's shall include liability
insurance and methods of maintaining the open space, recreation areas, parking areas,
signs, private roads, and exterior of all build. ings.
25.
No lot or dwelling unit in the development shell be sold unless a corporation,
association, property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed wi.th the right
to asse~s all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or
interest in the Use of the common areas and. common facilities in the development,
such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with
authority to control: and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of
the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include
compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of
assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded
CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City of Provisions required by the City as
Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of.compliance with this
requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This
condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public-purposes.
26.
Maintenance for all landscaped and open areas, including parkways, shall be provided
for in the CC&R's.
27.
Every owner of a unit shall own as an appurtenance to such unit, either (1) an
undivided interest in the common areas and. facilities, or (2) as share in the corporation,
or voting membership in an association, owning'the common areas and facilities.
28.
Uhless a De Minimus finding can be made by the Planning Director, within forty-eight
(48) hours of the approval of the project, the applicant/developer shall deliver to the
Planning Department a cashiers check or money order payable to the County Clerk in
the amount of One Thousand Three Hundred Dollars (el ,300.00), which includes the
One Thousand Three Hundred Dollars ($1,300.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158,
required by Fish and Game Code S~ction 711.4(d)(2) plus the Fifty Dollars (e50.00)
County administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination
required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code of Regulations
15075. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not
delivered to the Planning Department the check required above, the approval for the
project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game
Code Section 711.4(c). (Amended at Planning Director's Hearing on March 11,1993).
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Govemment Agency. All questions regarding the true
meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department
of Public Works.
R:%S%STAFFRPT~ePA92.DH 3116/93 klb
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
29. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map all existing
and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage
courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further
review and revision.
30.
A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all on-site flat work and
improvements) construction shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works
prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-
of-way. -'
31.
32.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained frdm the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City
right-of-way.
All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape .and irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing .improvements
contiguous to the site,
33.. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part
of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
34.
A copy of the grading and improvement plans. along with supporting hydrologic and
hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Rood Control and
Water Conservation District for approval prior to recordation of the final map or the
issuance of any permits. A permit from Riverside County Rood Control and Water
Conservation District is 'required' for work within their Right-of-Way.
35.
Supporting hydrologic calculation -shall be submitted for review for adequacy of the
existing catch basin at the north east comer of Winchester Road and Ynez Road if
.existing .hyd~ologlc studies submitted ere deemed inadequate by .the ~ .Engineer.
Upsizing may be :required upon .a finding of insufficiency. (Amended at Planning
Director's Hearing on March 11, 1993i.
36.
The final grading plan shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and shall be
reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works.
~/37.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit.from the State Water Resources Control Board.
No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI).has been filed or
the project is shown to be exempt.
38.
The Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
·
·
·
· ,
San Diego Regional Water Quality;
Riverside County Rood Control and Water Conservation District;
Planning Department;
Department of Public Works;
R:~"~qTAFFNaI~ePA92.DH 3/1B/93 klb
,./39:
40.
41.
'42.
44.
·
·
·
·
·
·
Riverside County Health Department;
Caltrans;
Parks and Recreation Department;
General Telephone;
Southern California Edison Company; and
Southern California Gas Company,
A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check,. The report shall
address all soils .conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections, :
An erosion control plan shall .be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted
to the Department of Public Works for review and approval,
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed free condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the DeparTment of Public Works,
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid, The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan .fee rate multiplied by the area of new development, The charge is
payable to the Riverside County Rood Control and Water Conservation District prior
to issuance of permits, If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has'
already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid,
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or easements for any off-
site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works at no cost to any agency,
A Flood Plain Development Pi~mit and Drainage Study shall be submitted to the
Department of Public Works for review and approval, The drainage study shall include,
but not be limited to, the following criteria:
.A,
'Drain;,ge and flood pr~tecti0n facilities which will protect all structures by
diverting site runoff to streets or. approved storm drain facilities as directed by
the Department of Public Works.
Adequate provision shall be made for the acceptance and disposal of surface
drainage entering the property from adjacent areas,
The impact to the site from any flood zone as shown on the FEMA flood hazard
map and any necessary mitigation to protect the site.
Identify and mitigate impacts of grading to any adjacent floodway.
The location of existing .:and post development 100-year floodplain and
floodway shall be shown on the improvement plan.
R:%S~STAFFFIPT~ePA92.1)I-I 3116/93 kib
45.
47.
48.
49.
50.
PRIOR
51.
52.
53.
The Developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing. onto
or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works- permits the use of
streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of Ordinance No. 460 will
apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited
for drainage purposes, the Developer shall provide .adequate facilities as approved by
the Department of Public Works.
The Developer shall protect downstream properties fr{~m damages caused by alteration
of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be
provided. b.y constructing adequate 'drainage facilities, including· enlarging existing.
facilities or by securing a drainage easement.
A drainage easement shall be obtained from'the affected property owners for the
release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy
of the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for'
review prior to recordation. The location of the recorded easement shall be delineated
on the grading plan.
The site is in an area identified on the Rood Hazard Maps as Rood Zone "A" and is
subject to flooding of undetermirled depths. Prior to the approval of any plans, this
project shall comply with Ordinance No. 91 ;12 of the City of Temecula, and with the
rules and regulations .of FEMA for development ;within Rood Zone "A", which may
include obtaining a letter of map revision from FEMA.
An Encroachment Permit shall be required from Caltransfor any work within their right-
of-way. ~,
The Developer. shall. post security and enter into. agree...ment guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance ~!~h .applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
TO THE ISSUANCE OF ENCROACHMENT PERMITS
All'necessary grading-permit requirements shall have been completed and approved.
'Improvement plans, including I~ut 'not limited to, streets, parkway t~ees, street lights,
driveways, drive aisles, parking lot lighting, drainage facilities and paving shall be
prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer on 24' x 36" mylar sheets and approved by
the Department of Public Works. Final plans (and profiles on streets) shall show the
location of existing utility facilities and easements as directed by the Department of
Public Works.
The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans to be
submitted to the Department of Public Works:
Rowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum o~er
A.C. paving.
B. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula standards:
207/207A, 208 and 401 (curb and sidewalk).
R:~'%STAFFRPT~BPA92.DH 3/16/93
54.
'55.
56.
57.
58.
PRIOR
59.
60.
Ce
Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with Ordinance No. 461 and shall be shown on the improvement
plans as directed by the Department of Public Works.
Improvement plane shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
All street and driveway centerline intersectione shall be at 90 degrees or as
approved .by the Department of Public Works.
Landscaping shall be-limitad in the comer cut-off area of all intersections and.
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through under-sidewalk drains.
Improvement plans per City Standards for the private streets or drives shall be required
for review and approval by the Department of Public Works.
All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall
be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and
constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable
TV, and/or security systems shall be pre'wired.
All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground.
All conditions of the grading permit and encroachment permit shall be complied with
to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department.
A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour or other disruption
to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
TO RECORDATION OF FINAL MAP
Any 'delinquent property taxes shall be paid.
The Developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement
guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements within 18 months
in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the
Department of Public Works.
Street improvements, which may include, but are not limited to: pavement,
curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, traffic
signals and other traffic control devices as appropriate.
B. Storm drain facilities
C. Landscaping (dopes and parkways). -.
D. Erosion control and slope protection.
R:'~S~qTAFFRPT'~38PA82.DH 3/I El83 Idb
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
Sewer and domestic water systems..
All trails, as required by the City's Master Plans.
Undergrounding of proposed utility distribution lines.
As deemed necessary by the Department of'Public WorkS., the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
San Diego Regional Water QUality; :
Rancho California Wa:ter District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Rood Control 'and Water Conservation District;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Department of Public Works;
Riverside County Health Department;
CATV Franchise;
Caltrans;
Parks and Recreation Department;
General Telephone;
Southern California Edison Company; and
Southern California Gas COmpany
Legal all-weather access as required by Ordinance No. 460 shall be provided from the
tract map boundary to a paved City maintained road.
All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication 'to the
ptjblic and shall continue in force until the 'City accepts or abandons such offers. All
dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of
Public Works.
A 67 foot half width right of way shall be dedicated along Winchester Road. A 25
foot wide easement. along the southerly tract map boundary shall be dedicated for the
Transportation Corridor.
The Developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property
interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the Developer shall, prior to submittal
of the final map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the
improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section
66462.5. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the Developer of all costs
incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection
with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash
deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the Developer, at the
Developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to
commencement of the appraisal.
Vehicular access shall be-restricted on Winchester Road and Ynez Road and so noted
on the final map with the exception of access as shown on the site plan .as approved
by the Department of Public Works.
R:'~S'~q"rAFFIFT~BPA92.DH 3/16/93 idb
67,
68.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
A Transportation Demand Management program will be required.
A 28 foot easement shall be dedicated for public utilities and emergency vehicle access
for all private streets and drives across adjacent parcels I and 3 of Parcel Map 23335.
Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements .ensuring access to all
parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, dr, ives or paring areas shall be provided by
CC&R's or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrent with the map.
Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be
delineated and noted on the final map.
An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to recordation of the Final
Map or ise~'~tc~'of building permits, whichever occurs tim.'
Easements, when-required for roadway slopas, landscape easements, drainage
.facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the
land. division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted
for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site
drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within
drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final
map stating 'drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions."
Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall
be. prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental
concerns and shell be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy·
of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
The following information shall be on the EC$:
A.' The delineation of the area within the 100 - year floodplain.
B. Special Study Zones.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental C0nst. raint Sheet rec~orded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
Prior to recordation of the final map, the Developer shall deposit with the Department
of Public Works a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal ~
impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal
mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said
payment to the time of issuance of a building permit.
Prior to recording the final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises
of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of
street improvements.
R:%S~qTAFFRPT%36PAI2.DH 3/15/93 kJb
PRIOR
76.
77:
78.
PRIOR
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for
location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing
compaction and site conditions.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code,
the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading
Standards and accepted grading construction practices, The final-grading plan shall
be in substantial Conformance with.the approved rough grading plan',
The Developer shall pay any.capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility
mitigation as required under the EIR/Negstive Declaration for the project. The fee to
be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the
date on which the Developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase
thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee,
a copy of which has been provided to the Developer. Concurrently, with executing
this Agreement, the Developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public
Facility fee. The amount of the bond shall be ~2.00 par square foot, not to exceed
$10,000. The Developer understands that said Agree .ment may require the payment
of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the
amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, the Developer will waive any
right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of
any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic
mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; provided that the Developer is not
waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the
amount thereof.
TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY
All impr0vem~nts shall be completed end in place per the approved planS, including but
not limited to, curb and gutter, A,C. pavement, sidewalk, dri~/e approaches, drainage
facilities, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets,
The Developer shall provide 'stop' 'controls at the intersection of local access streets
with arterial streets as directed by the Department of Public Works.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersection and adjacent
to driveways to'provide for minimum.sight distance as directed by the Department of
Public' Works.
Two 28 foot' wide secondary .a..C.cess roads to Winchester Road and Ynez Road
respectively; shall be constructed within a recorded private road easement as'approved
by the Department of Public WorkS.'
Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied only as directed by the Department of
Public Works at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform
to Section Nos. 37, 39, and 94 of the State Standard Specifications.
R:q~"%STAFFFF~36PAI2.DH 3116/93 klb
County of Riverside
HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY
TO:
FROM:
RE:
CITY OF TEMECULAPLANNING DEPT.
onmental Health Specialist IV
'TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 27690
12-10-92
The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the
Tentative Parcel Map No. 27690 for this project and cannot
make any recommendations until a sanitation letter is filed.
The requirements for a SAN 53 letter are as follows:
Should the project be served sanitary sewer services, this
Department would need only:
1. A "Will-serve" letter from the agency/agencies
serving potable water and sanitary sewers.
2. One copy of the Parcel Map.
SM:dr
'(909) 275-8980
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
RECEIVED
JAN 0 7 1993
Ans'd ............
or, .... e.~ta/rs:= .... erdatiom for such case am rmemdly limited Io items o( spedtic interest to the Disaict including District Mailer Drainage Plan
faci~ities~th~rregi~na~dc~m~iarddrdn~gefacid~whk:hmu~dbec~:d~r~d~gicd~xr~ Aor__a~___ansi~ofamasmrplansystem,
and District Area Drainage Ran fees (d-AIoF.,~e.A ,,~g "~ri fees). In addition, i~,,ddon of · geneed nature is Ixovided.
This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage FqBn facHtlies nor are oear facilities of regiend interest
This Ixc~ect involves District Master h facilities. The Dislfict will accept ownership oe such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities
' must be constructed to Dislfk:t ~'-~:1s, d$, 8nd Dimfk:t plan check and ineFe,~i~n will be required for District ~ccx~t-Y,s. Plin check,
· and/or a logical extermion of the adopted Master Drainago Plan. Tho District would consider
~eeshav~been~d~pted;~ic~b~ee~muidbep~dt~heF~dC~m~:~str~ct~rC~ty~xi~rt~rmi approval of the lxoject. or in the case
of aparcel map or subdivision prior to reco~alion of lhe-finaJ map. Fees to be pajd shouid be at the rate in e~ect ,e the time ol reeordao~ '
or ff deferred, at ~ time of issu&'ce of the actual permiT.
GFNFRAI INFtlR"ATII~N
This pmiect may require, National Pdlutmt Dim eimina~ System (NPDES) pemit from the Stm Water Resources Co,-~,~; Board.
Clearane for grading, recordalion, ot other final approval,' should not be given until the City ria$ detm'rnined tha~ 1he project h-J been granted ·
pertnit or is shown to be exempt.
~lhis proiect involves 8 Feclefid F.,~e.gvn~.y Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood piain. then the Clty should require the apllcant to
· provide adl sttxte$.cak::uiation$.l:dnsndotherinformlionrsquimdtonaetFEMArlDIJ; s.,.I 4s. and $tvxid furthsr require ttafthe a;pticant
obtain a~ Letter of MsD Revision (CLOMR) Imor to grltng, recordation or mher finaj approval oilhe Ixoiect, and a Letter of Map
Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy.
I! a naturaj watercourse or maDIxd flood plain is imlacmd by this ;x'oject the City should rm3uire the al~licant. to obtain 8 Section 1601/1603
AgreememfromtheC41ifomiaDap- h,~am of Rsh and Game and a Clean Watef Act Section 404 Permit from the U-S- ArmY C~Ps ol
Engineers, or written ooffespofidlr. cl from i ligeflciel indicBdlng ~e ixoject is exempt from thef4 requiremerits. A Cleall Wltlr Act Section
404 Water Quality Certfficatjon nay be required from the local Cairoalia RegiofiaJ Water QuaJity Control Board prior to issuance of 01i Corps
404 permit.
Very truly yours,
,,~/, DUSTYWILUAMS
c: o-.: I ?- ' 5 t - ¢t ?--
F(NIM:
P. O1
RIV. E SIDE COUNTY
December 17, 1992
· To:
ATTN:
TEMECULA' CITY PLANNINe DF.7~LI:~'T'D'IE~I'fl'
~ied Naaseh
Tract :27690.
With .reupect ta thec~ndltiuns of approval regarding the above
referenced plot plans the Fire Department. recommends the rallY-
ing fire pr~utecti~ mtesures be provi~ in acca~ce ~ith
Riverside C~nty 0rdin~ces ~d/~r recognized fire protection
standards:
1. T,he fire Oepartet is required to set a minimum'fire
~or the re~el or const~tion of all c~erclal buildings
using the procedure established in Ordinance
~ Provide or shah there exlsts a~ter mymtem capable of
/ delivering 1500 8~ ~or a Z ~ur ~ur~tlon at 20 PSI r~idual
operating pressure, which must .be available' before any
combustible uterlal ls placed on the Job site,
S- Applic~/Devel~r shell be responsible .to submit written
Certificate= from t~ water c~ny noting the location
the existing fire hydrant ~d that the existing water
system is capable of delivering 1500 ~ fire fl~ for a
hour -duration at 20 PSI residual o~ratlng pressure.,. If
water system ~rr~tly ~as not exist, the appllcant/~r
yeloper shall be responsl.~Ie to provl~e writt~ certifica-
tion that financial arrangem~ts have been made to provide
A combination of on--site and off-slte super fire hydrants
(6"M4"~2 112"x2 1/2"), Hill be located not less than 2~ feet
pr more than 165 feet from any portion of the building as
measured along approved vehicular travel NayS. The required
fire flow shall.be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in
the system.
Department.
·
:7..f,J, TT1 · ~AX C/.141,16t,74Sl
Blue tetrareflective pN~,vea~,ent markers shall be'-mountedon
private streets, moblie streets and drivewayS tO Indicate*
locati~ of fire hydrants. Prior to Installationt place..~mnt
of markers must be aDprDved by the'Riverside County FAre
(JIll It:l-Illl rl~ i'tlll la,I''7~ri
REt TR276~0
Page 2
Appltcant/DevmlDPer s~all separately submit two copy of
the' water mystem plans to the Fire Department" for raylee.
Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant tYl~m location end
spacing, and the system shall meet the fare flow requlre-
nientso Plans shall be signed/apprgved by a registered civil
engineer and the local-Hater company Htth the following
certificmti~n3 "Z certify that the design o~ the water
system ls in accordance wlth the requirements prescribed Dy
the Riverside C~unty Fire Department"-
Install a complete fire.,Drink.let system in all buildings
requiring. a..fire flDH Of 1500 8PM or greater, The po~t
indicator valve and fire department connection shall be
located to .the fruntm wlthln DO feet of a hydrants and a
minimum of 2D feet from the building(s)~ A statement that
the building(s) will be automatically fire sprinkled must
be included on the title page of the building plans-
Applicant/O~veloper mhall be responsible-to install e U,L,
Central' Station Monitored Fire Alarm System, That monitors
fire ~prinkler syStem-Hater flOWs P,Z,V,'I an~ all control
valves. Plans must be submitted to the Fire Department for
approve1 prior to lnstallati~n-
A statement that the building Hill be automatically fire
sprinkled must appear ~n the title page of the building
.plant-
Comply with Title 19. of' the California Administrative Code.
FIRE tANkS
11.
The applicant shall.prepare and submit to the Fire Depart-
ment for approvalm a site plan designating requ£red fire
lane~ ~ttn appropriate lane painting end/Or signs-
Install p~rtable fire extinguishers with a minimum ratlng of
2A-iOBC and signage- Fire Extinguishers located in public
areas snail be in recessed cabinets mounted 48' (inches) to
center above floor level with maximum 4" (inch)' pr~ecti~n
from the wall- C~ntact Fire Department for proper placement
of equipment prior to installation-
BUXLDXNB(s)
Know Key lock boxes shall be lnstaile~ on all buildings/
suites- If building/suite requires Hazardous
Material Reporting (Material Safety Data ~heete) the
~nox HAZ MAT Data and key storage cabinets shall be
installed, If b~lldings/suites are protected b~ a fire
or ~Urglar alarm system, the ~o~e~ will require vTamper'
~. T8 27&c~0
Pa~e
monitoring. Plane must be eubmitt~d to the Fire
.'DepartJaent for approval prior to installation. ·
14. Prior t~ issuance of bulldin~t permits. the applicant/de-
valeper sh~ll be responsible to submit a check or mone~
-'order in the amount ~f $~58,00 to the Riverside County Fire'
Department for plan check fees,
DISPLAY. ~OARDS
Display Boards: Display boards reqbired for apartments,
· condominiumss' recreatlonal vehicle parks and mobile home
parks will ~e' as followsl EXA~LE~ Each compleH shall. have
an illuminated diagrammatic representation of the- actual
layout which shows name of complex, all streetsf .building.
deeignators, unit members, .and fire hydrant locations within
the. complex. These directories. shall be a minimum 4'x4' in
dimension-and located ne~t t= roadway access,
16- Final conditions wilt be addressed when building plans are
reviewred in the Building and Safety Office, ..
~ues~ions regarding the .meaning of conditions shall be re-
Division·
All
/erred to' the Riverside County. Fire Department Planning
~aff.
RAYMOND H. RES I S
Chief Fire Department Planner
'Fire Safety Specialist
DRC CONDITIONS-BUILDING AND SAFETY
CASE NO..~:~ A c;} ?_-Go5 (¢=
,~. COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE 1991 EDITION OF THE-
UNIFORM BUILDING, PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL; 1990 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL
CODE; CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE TITLE 24 ENERGY AND HANDICAPPED
REGULATIONS AND THE TEMECULA CODE.
LIGHT POLLUTION.
3. OBTAIN ALL BUILDING PLAN AND PERMIT APPROVALS PRIOR TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION WORK.
~X~. OBTAIN STREET ADDRESSING FOR ALL PROPOSED BUILDINGS PRIOR TO
rSUBMITTAL FOR PLAN REVIEW.
5. PROVIDE OCCUPANCY APPROVAL FOR ALL EXISTING BUILDINGS (i.e. finaled
building permit, Certificate of Occupancy)
~'6."' ALL ~ BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES MUST COMPLY WITH
'APPLICABLE HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBILITY REGULATIONS.
/)<~'. PROVIDE HOUSE ELECTRICAL METER PROVISIONS FOR POWER FOR THE
RATION OF EXTERIOR LIGHTING, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS.
TE 8. RESTROOM FIXTURES, NUMBER AND TYPE, TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
PROVISIONS OF THE 1991 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE,
APPENDIX C.
9. PROVIDE AN APPROVED AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM.
10. PLANS ARE NOT· SUFFICIENT FOR REVIEW AND CONDITIONING.
11. NO COMMENTS AT THIS TIME.
/~2. PROVIDE APPROPRIATE STAMP OF A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL WITH
O~3.tNAL SIGNATURE ON PLANS SUBMITTED FOR.PLAN REVIEW.-
PROVIDE ELECTRICAL PLAN INCLUDING LOAD CALCS AND PANEL
SCHEDULE, PLUMBING SCHEMATIC AND MECHCANICAL PLAN FOR PLAN REVIEW.
BUILDING AND SAFETY
STATE OF CAUFO RNIA~NES5, TRANSPOIfrATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT 8, P.O. 8OX 231
SAN 8ERNARDING, CA 92402
TDD (714) ~
December 22, 1992
'RECEIVED
JAN 0 % 1993
Development Review
'08-Riv~79-R2;53±
Your Reference:
TTM 27690
Mr. Saied Naaseh
Planning Department
City of Temecula
City Hall.
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
.Dear Mr. Naaseh:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed
Tentative Tract Map 27690 (Parcel 2 of PM 23335) located on the
northerly side of Highway 79 (Winchester Road) and easterly of
Ynez Road in Temecula.
Please refer to the attached material on which our comments
have been indicated by the items checked and/or by those items
noted under additional comments.
If any work is necessary within the State highway right of
way, the developer must obtain an encroachment permit from the
Caltrans District 8 Permit Office prior to beginning work.
Please be advised that this is a conceptual review only.
Final approval of Street improvement, grading and drainage will.
be determined durihg the Encroachment'Permit process.-
If additional information is desired, please call Mr. Ahmad
Salah of our Development Review Section at (714) 383-5908.
G.A. LUNT'
Branch Chief,
Development Review
Attachment
Ymm lbFBtmlCE
/"' \1
__ 8r.,':v,':f( WT~,.)i.,.,,:.dlCT
I:h. AN. CHECKat
( co RTE PM)
W~ PaC}IIEBT TH~T T~B ITNNN C2N~CEF, D BNLOW BN INC~L~DF~D IN TH~ CONDITIONS. OF
APPROVAL POP. THIN IFRC)U~s
__.~NGp.14aL fd~/
RIGlIT OF gAY HEDICATICN TO PRaVIDE MLF-'dIDTN GN TIE S1;ATE NIGHgAY.
· HALF.--VZDTH OI-TIE STATE lEGSlaY,
i AND GUTTER~ STATE STAIBARD As? , TYPE- ~9-8 AUNG THE STATE HZGHVAY,
KZHG SHALL BE PitOllltTgD ALgIG TIE STATE NZGIMY ST TIE ~ PLACSENT OF I10 PARKING SZGNS,
35 FT HADZUS CUB REllaUIS gALL HE PROVIDED AT iIiEdECTIOMS BETH TIE STATE gIG&fAY. STATE STANDARD
NBP/1~88# (:::~U]lle--]L laiEEU:NAIR RANP'I SHALL BE PROVIDED iN TNE anti RWrtMNS AS DEFINED IN THE NIGNi,/AY
DESIGN NANHAL, BECTZml 10S.4 (2).
A IK3SITIVE VFJIIGULJUt I/dRIB! ALalG TEE PIK3PERTY FIIf3NTA~E BEALL BE PROVIDED TO LIMIT PHYSICAL ACCI'SS TO THE
STATE NIGNIMY,
VEHICULAR ACCESS
SIL4LL NOT HE* DEVEU3P~ D!IIF~rLY TO THE STATE NimadAY,
TO THE STATE NIGlaMY BEAI.L BE PtOVlDfD ST GISTIN KIILIC ImD CtmNECTIaNS.
VEHICUUUt A(3:F. SS TO THE STATE NIGllklAY INALL BE FIOVIDED ST / STNIONIO IVEHAYa~,
VEHIClUR ~ SIIML NOT BE ~ f,,TnOII OF TIE amsr.,,__,.asGN AT
VEHICULAR ACCESS TO TIll STATE NIGJ&IAY SHALL BE PROV~ .IT' A HIMD--TYPf ClMIECTIOJl.
VEHICULAR .ACCESS CONNECTICNIS SHALl. HE' PAVED AT LEAST VETNIl fiE* STATE NIGHBAY lIGHT OF BAY.
· ACC:ZSS POINTS TO THE STATE NIGH'dAY SHALL IE OEVEU3PB 'iN A IIANNER' .THAT BILL .PIK)VIDE EIGHT DISTANCE FOR .
IIPH ALgIG THE STATE NIGINAY,
lANDSCAPING ALONG THE STATE NIGH%MY SHALL I:IIOVIDE Fat SAFE $1GNT DISTANCE, CatPLY VZTN FZXB) OBJECT SET HACK
AN~ BE TO STATE STANDANDS,
A LEFT--IIJ~ LANE, INCUI)ING SliOJLDERS JUB ANY HEEESSAItY BIDBIINGr SULL BE PtQVIDED GN TIE STATE gIGNAY,
A TRAFFIC STLUY INDICATING GN AND OFF""'SZTE FLCM PATTERNS AND VOUMESf PRg'ae!Ic *INPACTS ANO PtOPOSD MITIGATION
IF. ASURES SIMLL BE PREPNEED,,
,/
PASKING SNAIL BE I)fVELf31qD IN A HANNB THAT BILL lOT CAUSE ANY VE!IIG. AJJl NOVB4ENT CalFLICTSf 181L~IH6 PJUUCING
STALL EITllANC~ AND EXITr BITNIH OF TEE BITRAICZ FIU3N TIll STATE HIGHBAY,
CARE BEALL BE TJUCIN blEN DIW. L~ING TOll PlU3PIRTr TO PIIflIRVE AND PBIPETUATE THE EXISTING INULINAGE PATTERN
OF THE STATE NIGIMY. PASTICIJUUI CCNSIDEIATEGN BEa]LD BE GIrtH TO CllaJLATIW INI2EASED STAIN RI. IOFF TO IJlIIRE
THAT A NIGHNAY DRAINAGE RKILEN 15 NOT CItF. ATED. '
PLEASE HEFBt TO ATTACHED A~OETZCllAL Ca!4E)fil. PROVIDE TO APPLICANT,
CCmSTMJCTIIII/hlTiON HITHIm PRESEwr ON ~ STATE RIGlIT OF ImY BlOW M IIIVIITIGATED loft POTENTIAL
K~IPRCUS MASTT ( I,E.ASIESTOSt P, tatOu~41~ ETC, ) AND HITIGATED AS PEt REQUIREMENTS OF llGULATCIY AGENCIES.
WHEN PLANS ARE SUINITTED; PLI COlill)IN li TIE REBJUtENENTS OF THE ATT'.ACNEI) NHANDOL/Tm, s~ll!S UILL EXPEDITE
TeE lEViif PRO~ES AND TIll REOUIRED Fat PLAN (bE{l(, PRO V]:D]!: ~qC) APPF~TCA.q~,
ALTHOUGH TIE TRAFFIC ,AND/II D/AIM GEIIRA~ IY TEll I~ DO NOT APPEAR TO NAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT
ON THE STATE 'HIGHgAY SYSTB4# CONSIDERATION lIST IE 61~1Jl TO THE CIMIJLATIVE EFFECT OF COHTIHLID DEV~.LOPIINT
'IN THIS ARRA,. ANY IIASIMES IEC~SSARY TO NITIGATE THE ;MIJIJkTIVE INPACT OF 11A/FIC MO/ON DRAINAGE SNAIl. IE
*PROVIDED PRIGIt TO 0R VITH DEVELOPMENT OF THE AREA THAT llCF. SSITATES TEEM°-
CGllSIDERATION SHALL BE GI1~rJI TO THE PROVISIONt 0it FUTLltE PROVIS~If' OF SIGNILIZATION Ale LIGHTING OF-THE
llllTecsrTICN OF NB 111 STATE NIBllY klBI IdlUNTS ME HET.
ZT APPtARS THAT THE TRAFFIC AND/ON DRAINA6E IENERA~ IY 1115 P:KIPOSAI. ~ HAVE A SlONIFIC~dlT EFFECT ON
THE STATE 'HIGHIdAY SYSTEN OF THE AREA, ANY 14EASIMES TO MITIGATE THE TRAFFIC ANO/Oit DIAlRAGE lieACTS SItALL IE
INCLLgED I~[TH THE DEVELOPHENT,
· H!S PQtTION OF THE STATE NIGINAY 15 INGJI)D IN Tll CALIr43itNIA MASTER ~ OF STATE HIGHVAYS ELIGIILE
OFFICIAL SCENIC HIGNUAY DESIGNATION AND IN THE FUTtME YI3Uit AGENCY HAY VISH TO NAVE THIS RCUTE OFFICIALLY
DESIGNATED AS A STATE SCENIC HIGHtdAY, '*
THIS PoetsON OF THE STATE HIGHIMY HAS. SEEN OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED AS A STATE SCINIC .HIGHUAY7 JUiO DEVELOPl4k'~
IN THIS CCIRIIXI SHGULD IE C6t~ATIILE VlTN THE SCENIC NIGifi/AY
ZT IS RECI3glIZED THAT THEHE IS CONSIDERABLE PUBLIC I:GNCERN ABGUT NOISE LIVEIS N)JACENT TO 'IIEAVILY TRAVEL.
HIGHUAYS, :LATE DEVELOPHENT~ IN ORDER TO BE CCMPATIBLE VITN THIS CONCERNf HAY IEOUIIE SPECIAL NOIS~ ATTFJeJATl~3k'
PLEASURES, DEVEL(PHENT OF THIS PROP~TT SHaJI~. INCLLI)E ANY llI:F. SSARY NOISE ATTENUATION°
CA~,TRJ~'4S DISTeICT 8
DEVELONENT ]bsvzif IkANCH .
P,O, ~ 231
SAN BEHHANOlNO, CA 92402
/2~ COPY OF ANY CaNOITIONS OF APPItOVAL ON REVISE~ APPROVAL,
A C:¢3PY OF ANY IXX:W4ENTS PROVIDING ADOITII3AL STATE HIGI!IIY RIGHT OF IdAY UPON 'SECCIDATION-OF THE
bY ImOPOSALS TO FURTHER DEVELOP THIS PROPERTY.
__ A CI)PY OF THE TRAFFIC ON ENVIR(Ne!NTAL STI~Yo
QIEaC PRINT OF TIE PARCEL ON ~q~eACT NAP.
CHiC:I[ PRINT OF TI! ~ FOR ANY I~S glTHIi IX ~DJACENT TO THE STATE NIGHtdAY RIGHT. OF 1MY.
CHECI( PRINT OF THE GRADING ANO ]:)ItAINAGE PUUIS FOR TIllS Ptl)PEItTY IN AVAILAILE., ._,
f
December 23, 1~92
RECEIVED
DEC 2 8 1992
............
I~ard of Directors:
Cuba F. Ko
DouglLs V. Kulberg
~r, Vk-e P~;dent
Ralph H. Dally
· ~aan~y K, Hugires
Jeffrey ], ,Minkier
Lisa D. Peterson
Richard D, :Steffey
Ofilcer,~:
· John F. Hennigar
Phillip L Forbes
/F--J*. '~ob" Lemons
.,~dneth C. DeaJy
Perry R. Louck
Linda M. Fregoso
Mt~jormick. Kidman
& Behren~
Mr. Saicd Naaseh'
City of Temecula
Plnnnlng Department
43180 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Water Availability
Tract No. 27690
Dear Mr. N88sch:
Please be advised thnt the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District CRCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements
between RCWD and the property owner.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Senga Dohcrty.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
St B P
eve rannon, .E.
Manager of Development Engineering
SB:Sl):eb~8\FIM
cc: Senga Doherty, Engineering Technician
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT MAP NO. 27690
IMPROVEMENTS
Street and Drainage
Water
Sewer
TOTAL
DATE: April 5, 1994
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR
SECURITY * SECURITY *
s 0.00 I 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
$ 0.00 $ 0.00
Maintenance Retention
Monument Security
* Note:
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
The Agreement for Payment of Drainage Improvement Fee will be
recorded concurrently with Final Map 27690 and a bond of $20,000
wil be posted for this developer's fair share of drainage improvements.
DEVELOPMENT FEES ·
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
RCFCD Drainage Fee Paid
Fire Mitigation Fee
Signal Mitigation Fee - Paid
Road and Bridge Benefit Fee
Other Development Fees
$ 0.00
$ 1,053.69
$ NIA
$ 2,550.00
$ N/A
$10,000.00
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee
Inspection Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
Letter of Map Revision (LOMAR Review)
Fees Paid to Date
Balance of Fees Due
102.00
8.00
770.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
880.00
0.00
CITYOFTEMECULA
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA .92590
Arm: City Clerk
AGRF-~ FOR PAYMENT OF DRAINAGE IMPRO~ FF, F~
This Agreement is made this day of ,1994 by and
between the City d Temecula, a municipal corporation, ('City') and Kelly J. O'Neil, M.D.,
an individual, Ramzi Kattan, M.D., an individual, Byron P. Sansore, D.D.S., an individual,
and Anthony Young, D.C., an individual, collectively, (the *Doctors*).
I~PClTA~ -~
A. The Doctors are the oneis of the following real l,gopaty (the 'Property') in
the City of Temecula: Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 23335. The legal description of the Property
is described in Exhibit 'A ', attached hereto and inwzlnmd herein by reference.
B. The Doctors propose to' develop the Plopc~ty pursuant to Tentative Tract Map
No. 27690 Amendment No. 1, approved on March 11, 1993 by the City of Temecula (the
C. City has determined that the Project will impact drainage facilities within the
City as identified in the Condition No. 35 for the Project. These impacts must be mitigated
by payment of a fee as a condition of development, or partia'pafion in an assessment district
for additional drainage facility construction, which fee or assessment district shall be
identified as the "Drainage Improvement Fee."
D. Subject to compliance with all public hearing procedures and applicable hw,
the City proposes to impose the Drainage Improvement Fee upon new dev~opments within
Parcels 1 through 5 of Parcel Map 23335, and Parcels 1 through 5 of Parcel Map 26852 in
the City of Temecula, as shown on Bxhibit "C" attached hereto, in order to construct
additional drainage facility improvements (the 'hnprovemonts") to serve and benefit those
new developments, including the Project.
E. The City has determined the estimated costs of additional drainage facility
improvements as shown on Bxhibit "B* attached hereto. The costs have been distributed on
a pro-ram basis according to the acreage of the benefitted lots to determine the estimated
Drainage Improvement Fee .for the Project.
F. In order for the Doctors to proceed with the Project without full payment of
the Drainage Improvement Fee in a timely manner, the City and the Doctors have
determined to enter into this Agreement.
G. The term "drainage facility' shall refer to public drainage and flood control
facilities, and .similar public infrasmicUn'e.
NOW, Ti~PI~ORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. r~in~e Inlprovement Fee
(a) The City Council will. establish the mount of the Drainage
Improvement Fee in the future. The Fee will be based upon the acreage of each
development against the total acreage of all available lots benefitted by the Improvements.
The Drainage Improvement Fee shall also establish the specific drainage facility to be
constructed and their cost, the benefit assessment area and the method by which the fair
share, pro-tara obligations of each property are to be established based on the demand for the
Improvements. In no event, however, shall the Drainage Improvement Fee for the Project
exceed one hundred twenty-five percent (125%) of the estimated Drainage Improvement Fee
established in Exhibit *B* to this Agreement.
(b) In lieu of immediate payment of the estimated Drainage
Improvement Fee the Doctors may provide seattity for the estimated Drainage Improvement
Fee pursuant to Section 2 of this Agreement. Upon five days written demand from the City,
which may be made at any time, the Doctors shall pay the City the estimated Drainage
Improvement Fee or any punion thereof, in order to pay for the formation of the financing
mechanism of the Drainage Improvement Fee and the design and constn.,ction of the
Improvements.
(c) When the Drainage Improvement Fee is established, the Doctors
shah pay the City the Fee within five days of receiving written notice from the City. Any
estimated Drainage Improvement Fee previously paid shah be a credit against the Drainage
Improvement Fee.
(d) When the Drainage Improvement Fee is established by the City
Council, the Doctors will be reimbursed for any difference between the estimated Drainage
Improvement Fee previously paid and the Drainage Improvement Fee if the estimated
Drainage Improvement Fee exceeds the Drainage Improvement Fee.
(e) The City shah record a release of this Agreement upon payment
of any Drainage Improvement Fee owing and shah provide Doctors with a copy of such
release.
(f) As part of paying the Drainage Improvement Fee, Doctors may
be required to participate in an assessment district, drainage district, or other financing
mechanism based upon their fair share apportionment.
2. Security for the r~in~,e Improvement Fee
(a) Concurrent with the execution of this Agreement, Doctors shall
provide an in'evocable letter of credit or other form of bond approved by the City, in a form
approved by the City Attorney, in an amount equal to the estimated Drainage Improvement
Fee for the Project, plus twenty five percent (7.5 ~) of the estimated amount.
Co) As an alternative to collecting the fee from the letter of credit or
bond, if the Doctors fail to pay the Drainage lmprovement Fee within thirty (30) days of the
date the demand is made, the City my assess a penalty of ten percent (10%) of the amount
owing and make said Fee, inclusive of penalty, a Hen upon the described real pwpeaty by
recording a notice that said Fee is due under the terms of this Agreement with the County
Recorder of Riverside County. The notice shall state the fact that it is unpaid and draws
interest on the Fee and penalty at the rate set forth at California Revenue & Taxation Section
19269 until paid.
(c) The City may as an alternative to the lien procedure set forth
above, bring legal action to collect the Drainage Improvement Fee due. The Doctors agree
that if legal action by the City is necessary to collect the Fee, the Doctors shall pay the City
a reasonable sum as attorney's fees and court costs, together with penalty and interest
determined according to paragraph 4(b) of this Agreement.
3. Agreement Runs With 1 ~nd
This Agreement pertains to and runs with the Property. This Agreement binds
the successors in interest of each of the parties.
4. nindinl, Agreement
This Agreement shah be binding upon Doctors, Doctors' successon and
assigns.
5. Amendment/No Continuing Wniver
This Agreement may be modified or mended only in writing, signed by both
parties. This Agreement contains the full and complete understanding of the parties and
supersedes any and all prior oral or written agreements or xzprese. ntations. A waiver of any
term or condition of this Agreement by either party shall not be deemed a continuing waiver
thereof.
6. Attom~y's Fees
Should either party determine that it is necessary to file a'legal action to
enforce or intctpret the provines of this Agreement, the prevailing party in that litigation
shah be entitled to its reasonable costs, including but not limited to attomey's fees.
mUnndd,vX~. -t.Asf/ats
Notice shah be deemed given under this Agreement when in writing and
deposited in the United States mail, first-class, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
CITY: DOCTORS:
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Temecula Medical Park Dev., G.P.
c/o Byron Sansore, D.D.S.
40975 ~V'mchester Road
Temecula, CA 92591
8. Misce!lnneous Provisions
A. If any provision of this Agreement is adjudged invalid, the remaining
provisions shall not be affected.
B. If there is more than one (1) signer of this Agreement as Doctors, their
obligations are joint and several.
IN WrFNF_SS WHERBOF, the parties or their duly authorized representatives have
executed this Agreement as of the date set out above.
~- crrY o~ ~
DOCTORS
By:
Tim D. Serlet, Director
Public Works/City Engineer
ATTEST:
June S. Greek
City Clerk
Kelly J. O'Neil, M.D.
Byron R. Sansore, D.D.S.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Anthony Young, D.C.
Scott F; Field
City Attorney
a:~sdd,v~io,~ -s-AW.~s
EXHIBIT "A"
I EnAI DFSCRIPTION
PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP 23335 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 172, PAGES
87 THROUGH 89, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA.
EXHIBIT "B"
ESTIMATFD COSTS OF ADDITIONAl DRAINAn; FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS
A, Estimated Engineering Deign Costs
B, Estimated Plan Check and Inspection Fees '
(calculated per Engineer's estimate dated 8-25-93)
C, 'Estimated Construction Costs
(calculated per Engineer's estimate dated 8-25-93)
D, . Estimated Administration Construction Costs
{5% of estimated construction costs)
TOTAL
$10,000.00
$11,750.00
$170,000.00
88,250.00
$200,000.00
DISTRIBUTION OF FSTIMATFD COSTS
Total Amount of Estimated Costs
Total Number of Contributing Properties
Total Amount Due per Contributing Property
$200,000.00
10
$20,000.00
RANCHO
· 172/~7-R9 Parcel Moo No. ~3,3~0~
173768-73 Porce/ Mop No. 26g~a,')
MB. 87359 S.D. Tem~culo LandS~Valer
.PM 135/8S Parcel Mop No. 19677 '
RM. 139189-~0 " " " 21381
APR. 19~
~/Zll ~~
II
ITEM
NO.
7
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL ~
CITY ATFORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER '
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
April 5, 1994
Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
RECOMM EN DATION:
That the City Council authorize staff to solicit a Request for Proposal (RFP) from
qualified firms experienced in Employee Assistance Programs (EAP).
BACKGROUND:
An Employee Assistance Program (EAP) can provide a confidential, counseling
resource outside the work place that can assist employees and their families with
personal problems before those problems create performance issues. The City can
benefit from contracting with a EAP consultant to:
Increase job performance and reduce absenteeism.
Reduce turnover and retain valuable employees.
Improve management effectiveness and employer/employee relations.
Lower health insurance costs and improve safety.
Provide a resource for the City if a disaster or tragedy occurs.
Staff is requesting authority to send out a RFP to 11 local firms that currently provide
this service to local businesses. In addition to the counseling service, staff is looking
to these firms to provide training to management and employees on such issues as
substance abuse, stress, depression and other job related issues.
The cost for an EAP service varies depending on the provider. Rates vary from a flat
fee of approximately $1,500.00 per year for all services, to an hourly charge. If the
Council approves sending out the RFP then a selection committee will evaluate all of
the proposals, conduct interviews, and enter into negotiations with the top ranked
firm.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There are adequate funds available in the Human Resources Budget to fund this
program through the end of the 1993-94 Fiscal Year. Funding for the .1994-95 fiscal
year will be approved by the City Council with the adoption of the upcoming budget.
ITEM
NO.
8
APPROVAL
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Harwood T. Edvalson, Assistant City Manager~
April 5, 1994
Council Opposition to AB 3167 and H.R. 3636
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council 'authorize the Mayor to sign the attached letters in opposition to
Assembly Bill 3167 (Epple) and House of Representatives Bill 3636 (Markey/Fields).
BACKGROUND:
At the Council meeting of March 22, 1994, Council directed staff to prepare letters of
opposition to an assembly bill (AB 3167) that would preempt the City's adopted anti-graffiti
ordinance, and to a house of representatives bill (H.R. 3636) that would eliminate the city's
ability to franchise companies wishing to provide cable TV services in Temecula.
The justifications for taking opposition to these two pieces of legislation are included in the
attached letters. The letter opposing AB 3167 would be addressed to Assembly members
Haines, Epple, Boland, Bates, Gotch, Isenberg, Lee, Rainey, and Umberg, the Assembly's
Public Safety Committee. The letter opposing H.R. 3636 would be addressed to House
Representatives Packard, Calvert and McCandless.
FISCAL ANALYSIS:
In its current form, AB 3167 would have a negative fiscal impact on the City by allowing
greater potential for shoplifting of graffiti implements. This would undoubtedly increase the
incidence of and cost for removal of vandalism in the City.
H.R. 3636 would preempt any new franchise fees from any future telephone company-owned
cable service. It would create an uneven playing field between the existing cable operator,
which pays approximately $139,000 in annual franchise fees.
City of Temecula
RonsZd H. Roberrs Assemblyman, 66th District
Ma~or 29377 Rancho California Road, Suite 102
J~rsy E. Stono Temecula, CA 92591
Mayor Pro Tern
Temecula, California 92590
Pstricis H. Birdsall
Councilmember
Dear Assemblyman Haynes:
April 5, 1994
Re: AB 3167
REQUEST FOR A "NO" VOTE
J. Sal Mufioz
Councilmember
Ronald J. Parks
Councilmember
(909) 694..6444
FAX (909) 694-1999
On behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, I am writing to voice opposition to the
proposed preemption of local anti-graffiti regulations. In its current form, this legislation
would remove the ability of the City to regulate the sale and display of graffiti implements
including aerosol paints.
We have two major concerns with this legislation:
(1) This bill makes grnffiti implements more accessible to minors. Tamecula's
current ordinance requires aerosol paints and marking pens to be swred in an area not
accessible to the public in the regular course of business without employee assistance. This
discourages shoplifting of these items to be used for graffiti vandalism. AB 3167 only requires
the posting of signs indicating sales to minors to be illegal, leaving graffiti implements open to
shoplifting.
(2) AB 3167 would take away the City's ability to deal with graffiti in a manner
appropriate to our individual community, Although all cities in Southwest Riverside County,
including the County, have adopted anti-graffiti ordinances, they have been tailored to address
the needs of the individual communities. As conditions change, and new forms of vandalism
become prevalent, Temecula wishes to retain the ability w address its problems quickly and in a
manner that best suits our citizens needs.' Temecula adopted an anti-graffiti ordinance March
23, 1993, more than one year before the State Assembly has even set a date for this bill to be
heard in the Public Safety Committee.
We urge your opposition to AB 3167. Please don't allow a special interest lobby to
successfully preempt local government legislative authority, and relax local anti-graffiti
enforcement standards.
Please vote no on AB 3167.
Sincerely yours,
Ronald H. Robarts
Mayor
Jeffrey E. Stone
Mayor Pro Tern
Patrlcla H. Birdsall
Councilmember
J. Sal MuBoz
Councilmember
Ronald J. Parks
Councilmember
(909) 694-6444
FAX (909) 694-1999
Dear Congressman Packard:
March 28, 1994
Re: H.R. 3636
REQUEST FOR A "NO" VOTE
On behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, I am writing to register our opposition
to H.R.3636 which would eliminate the franchising authorities of municipal governments in the
area of telephone company provided Cable TV. It is our understanding that this bill will reach
the House floor soon.
Our concerns with the bill are threefold:
(1) Loss of franchise authority weakens local control over quality and monopolistic
pricing of local Cable TV. Recent rules adopted by the FCC provide for monitoring of
service levels and basic pricing by local government. Franchise agreements also include
language related to service and pricing. Removing the franchise authority of the City of
Temecula will weaken the leverage that the City has to require fair and adequate Cable TV
service by the telephone company in an area that is not geographically open to receipt of free
over-the-air TV signals.
(2) Loss of franchise revenue would create a hardship. The City of Temecula uses
annual franchise fees to support public services in its general fund extending even to police and
fire protection services. These franchise fees also help bear the cost of cable rate monitoring
recently allowed through the Federal Communications Commission.
(3) Dis-enfranchisement would result in the loss of local public services. Through
its cable franchise negotiations, the City of Temecula was successful in obtaining government
access programming, allowing for the viewing of City Council meetings on Cable TV. A
$75,000 monetary grant was also obtained to provide equipment to expand government access
to provide additional public educational/service messages and programming. Loss of this
authority would leave local government without the abfiity to obtain similar public services
from the telephone company.
We urge you to oppose H.R. 3636.
Sincerely yours,
Ronald H. Robeits
Mayor
ITEM
NO. 9
ORDINANCE NO. 94-10
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
~ AMENDING CHAPTER 2.08 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE
RF~UIRING THAT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ~LFCTIONS OF
THE CITY OF TEMECUIA BE m~,Ln ON THE FIRST TUESDAY
AFTER THE FIRST MONDAY OF NOVEMBER IN EACH ODD-
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS
FO~ I OWS:
Sectiop 1 - Findings: The City Council of the City of Temecula finds as follows:
A. Pursuant to the .terms of Government Code Section 36503.5, cities are
authorized to change the date of general municipal elections to coincide with the elections
dates of the statewide direct primary, the statewide general election or the date of school
district elections;
B. The City Council finds that its goals of encouraging maximum voter turn-out
and minimizing costs will be promoted by changing the general municipal election date of the
City from the first Tuesday, after the first Monday of November in each even-numbered year
to the tirst Tuesday, after the first Monday of November in each odd-numbered year.
C. If approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, this change will
not have the effect of extending any term of office by more than twelve months. '
Section 2 - Change in General Municipal Election Date: Section 2.08.010 of the
Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to to read as follows:
"2.08.010 When held Commencing with the genenl municipal elections to
occur during 1997, general municipal elections of the City of Temecuh shah be held on the
first Tuesday after the first Monday of November in each odd-numbered year.'
Section 3 - Extension of Terms of Office: Section 2.08.020 of the Temecula
Municipal Code is herby amended to read as follows:
"2.08.020 Extension of terms
A. Those councilmembers of the City of Temecuh whose terms of office would
have, prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, expired following the November,, 1996,
general election shall, instead, continue in office until no later than the fourth Tuesday after
the date of the November, 1997, general municipal election of the City of Temecula."
R~mis~62 I
B. Those councilmembers of the City of Temecula whose terms of office would
have, prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, expired following the November, 1998 general
election shall, instead, continue in office until no later than the fourth Tuesday after the date
of the November, 1999, general municipal election of the City of Temecula.
Section 4 - F/feetive flute:. This Ordinance shall become operative 30 days from
the date of its adoption and upon approved by the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Riverside.
Section S - The City Clerk k hereby directed to:
A. Certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published as
required by hw;
B. Transmit a copy of this Ordinance to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of
the County of Riverside, together with the request that said Board approve this Ordinance
and provide the City with notice of such appwval; and
C. Within thirty (30) days after approval of this Ordinance by the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Riverside, cause a notice to be mailed to all registered voters in
the City of Temecula informing them of the change in the general municipal election date
and councilmembers terms affected by this Ordinance, which notice shall be in accord with
the requirements specified in California Government Code Section 36503.5(e).
PASSI~r}, APPROVED AND ADOPT!~, this 5th day of April, 1994.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEA1,]
a~onb~62 2
STATE OF CAt-t~ORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Ordinance No. 94-10 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading
at a regluar meeting of the City Council on the 22nd day of March, 1994, and.that
thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Temecula on the 5th day of April, 1994 by the following roll call
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CO~C~ERS:
CO~CII3vIEMBI~,S:
CO~CIIIIEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R~mb~62 3
ITEM NO. 10
ORDINANCE NO. 94-11
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMFj2UI~ AME~ING CHAFFER 2.04 OF THE TEME~
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE TIME AND PLACE-OF
CITY COUNCIL
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEIVlLc'ULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Chapter 2.04 of the Temecula Municipal Cede is hereby amended to read as
follows:
'2.04.020 - Time and place of meetings.
A. Regular meetings for the City Council shall be held on the second and fourth
Tuesday of each month. Regular meetings shall commence at 7:00 p.m. and adjourn at 10:00
p.m., subject to an adopted motion to extend the meeting. Regular meetings shall be conducted
at the Community Recreation Center (CRC), 30875 Rancho Vista Road.
B. The City Council may, be resolution, designate another date, time and location
for a meeting."
Section 2. l~.ffectlve r~. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty
(30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The
City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this
Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption
of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish
a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and
against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
PASSED, APPROVED AND .ADOPTED this 5th day of April, 1994.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
A'lq'EST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
tmlsX94-11
(SEAL)
STATE OF CP-T-wORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS.
CITY OF Ti2VIECULA )
I, JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Ordinance No. 94--11 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading
at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 22nd day of March, 1994, and that thereafter,
said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Temecula on the ~th day of April, 1994 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COIINC~H~ERS:
COUNTERS:
COUNCH_A{EM~ERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ords~,94-11 2
2.04.010
Chapter 2.04
CITY COUNCIL
Sections:
2.04.010
2.04.020
2.04.030
2.04.040
2.04.0S0
2.04.060
2.04.070
Election of members.
Tim and place of meetings.
Impreper conduct at meetings.
Adoption of procedure.
Compensation.
Commission appointments.
Presiding officer.
2.04.010 Election of members.
The electors of the city shall elect council mem-
bers at ~e gene~ municiV~ election held every
two years on the date of the statewide general elec-
tion. (Ord. 90-02 § I (2.04.010))
2.04.020 Time and place of meetings.
A. Regular meetings for the city council shall he
held on the second and fourth Tuesdays 'of each
month. Regular mcefinSs shall commence at'seven
p.m. and adjourn at ten p.m., subjea to an adopml
motion to extend the meeting. RegUlar meefinSs
shall he conducted at the Temecula Commmljty
Center, 28816 PujOl Street If a regular meetins falls
on a holiday, the regular meeting shall he held on
the next bumess day.
B. The city council may, by resolution, designate
another date, time and location for a meeting. (OnL
90-02 § 1 (2.04.020))
2.04.030 Impleper conduct at meetings.
A. All person shall comply with the meeting
procedures announced by resolulion of the city
council and no person shall interfere with or inter-
rupt a city council meeting.
B. The presiding officer may desi~e a mere-
her of the county sheriff' s department as se~geont at
arms who shall carry out the directions of the pre-
siding officer to include making arrests as directed
by the presiding officer. Any person who fails to
comply with a direction given by the presiding
officer may he removed.
C. Any person using profane, vulgar, loud or
boisterous language at any meeting or otherwise
interrupting the proceedings, who refuses to be seat-
ed or keep quiet when ordered to do so by the may-
or or other presiding officer of the council, is guilty.
of a misdemeanor. (Ord. 90-02 § 1 (2.04.030))
2.04.040 Adoption of procedures,.
The city council may, by resolution, adopt roles.
of procedure and regulations pertaining therew to
govern' the conduct of its meetings and any of its
other fimgtions and activities. (Ord. 904E § 1
(2.04.040))
2.04.0S0 Compensation.
A. Each council member shall be entitled to a
salary in the mount of three hundred dollars per
month.
B. Upon the submission of an itemized account,
any council member may be-reimbursed for the
marice of official duty. (Ord. 90-02 § 1 (2.04.050))
2.04.060 Commission appointments.
Unless otherwise specifically provided in this
code or by sta~ law, all city board and commission
appoinUnents, except for ex officio members where
applicable, shall be made by the city council (Ord.
904)2 § I (2.04.060))
2'04,070 'Presiding officer.
A. City council shall meet on the Tuesday after
the general municipal election and choose one of its
members as mayor and one of its members as mayor
pro tempore.
B. The mayor, and the mayor pro tempore, shall
serve a term of one year, or until a successor for
each position is chosen. Thee affirmative votes
shall be required to choose or change the mayor or
mayor pro tempore.
C. In addition to the powers and duties of a
council member, the mayor, or in the mayor's ab-
sence, the mayor pro tempore, shall be the presiding
officer of the city council. (Ord. 90~02 § l
(2.04.070))
15
ITEM NO. I 1
CITY ]~N~GER ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:
1994.
DISCUSSION:
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
April 5, 1994
Proposed Resolution re: Establishing a Nonrefundable Fee for Charitable,
Religious and Commercial Solicitation
That the City Council continue the public hearing until April 26,
The proposed resolution is still under review by the staff.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
· ITEM NO. 12
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY ATTOR~YPROVAL-~~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager /
Gary Thornhill, Director of Plan~~
April 5, 1994
Ordinance Amending the Land Use Code Regarding the Term of Plot Plans,
Conditional Use Permits, and Public Use Permits
Prepared By: Debbie Ubnoske
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Read by title only and introduce an Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE' NO. 94_
'AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE
TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND
PUBLIC USE PERMITS.'
2. Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94__
'RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF
PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND PUBLIC USE
PERMITS.'
BACKGROUND
The Council requested staff to compile a list' of applications that would be affected from this
change, which resulted in this item being continued from February 22, 1994, March 8, 1994
and April 8, 1994.
Attachment
1, Applications Potentially Affected by Ordinance (Chart) - page 2
2. Continued City Council Report dated February 22, 1994 - page 3
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
APPLICATIONS ~Y AFFECTED BY ORDINANCE
Mm:B-/ORANDUM
FROM:
DAT~
1994
the ,,aaHo,,o~ time e,'~-~ Opm,w,~,, ('m pm'imlzr, Sm~-~ 4 xe, biin$ u~ the ~ ol'
Should you have amy qm~.~_'on% or if I can be of any *..~...-,~e,, please feel fuse ID coutac$ either
me or my rotf .at ym= mmuvimi,,,,k,,e,,
AllachmmU:
1. Five Year ]:-xten,dOnm - page 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
FIVE YEAR za'~'sra,~ONS
11001
/IVE YEAR
11234 6/19/9~) Dr, dfoM
20Eu:e
~dlai,~gs -
11339 5/06/91 Coop Auto
Exp. 5106/93 Sen, ira Cmt~
91,216 hi. fL.
11376 6/05190 ~ Ho~
2 mat 7,992 sq.
11604 9/18/90 Coast ~ ~
1162 1 8F28/90 Koll Coraltony
FnamH
· 116,368 sq. ~
11759 11/92 t~mmino
17,5.~2 sq. fL.
n, dl,Hn,
11654 11/30/90 ~
108,671 sq. ~
2.5'3 ac~e,
11767 1/01/91 Mn~a
6baymUmrv~
Ynn-Rmd. ((1) b, dHin=~ built)
Tower Plan
Wtst ~ of l~xmt ~ av~c,,-~mstely 2300 fen
(gZ/-I10.(DT)
~-~,-rc era'net of Rmmim Way and Businert Park
(921-020.061)
North of W'mc~.n~ Road, w~st of Ynn Road.
(910-200-074)
28853 ~ Street (r~-luo~u3) Atmm=~ 1,~0 hi.
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
CONTINUED CITY COUNCIL REPORT
DATED FEBRUARY 2.2, 1994
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
C .I'FORNEY
RNANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
February. 22., 1994
Ordinance Amending the Land U~ Code Regarding the Term of Plot Plans,
Prelamd B~ Debbie Ubrmske
RECOMMENDATION:
1.
ORmNANCE N0.
"AN ORDINANCE 'OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMEIE)IN6 THE LAND USE CODE REGARDIN0 THE
TERM OF PLOT R.AN~, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND
PUBUC USE FERM~I.'
Adolet s Resdulton entlllm]:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-__
'RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TBIM OF
PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PEtMITE, AND PUBUC USE
BACKGROUND
At the April 5. 1993 Planning Commission meeting, staff recommended the Cc.,.,,iasion
amend Ordinance 348 to Mlow for two additionBI one year extensions of .tim for Plot PIBns.
Conditional Use Permits, end Public Use Permits. At this meeting, the Commission exlxas sad
a concem relative to extc, ,:ling the life of permits they had never seen end re{luested staff
rosearch the number of Council 8pproved projects which had not .expired end bring it beck to
the Commission. STaff reseBrched City 8pprovels for the period from April 1990 TO June
1990 which we the period of time the City Council acted sotely To ep. prove or deny projects.
During this period. the City Council ected on eight County transferred plot plens 8nd no
conditional use permits or public use permits. Of the eight plot plans acted on. ell have 'either
been consUuctad or have expired. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission ,,Jsl~ng,
the inning Commission direclad staff to prepare an Ordinance providing for two additional
yearn to allow applicants additional time to construct their projects. Commissioner Hoegland
was opposed to such an Ordinance. He felt giving mpplicxnta ·n additional two years was not
in the City's best interest.
At the December 6, 1993 Plarmb~ Commission meeting, the Ordirmnce was presented end
· pproved by the Commission three to one with Commissioner Hoegland in opposition.
.Pursuant to prior Council direction, Section 4 of the litached Ordinance allows permittees to
· quest ·instat·meat of exlimd City 8pproved' applications. within six months of the date the
Council ·dopta this Ordinance. The rm~,ilAt~.,Jnt hearing will be conducted by the Planning
Director. For examlle, if the City had 8pproved · cono'itim~ tee Fennit on the date of
incorporation, December 1, 1989, the pamdt would have exlired on November 30, 1991.
Under Section 4 of this Ordinance, the Plmming n:re :t~r oould grant the permittee up to three
one-year extensions of tim. The effect of this would be to extend the permit to November
30, 1994. If the conditional use pannit.had been rapproved on .December 1, 1990 end had
expired on November 30, 1992, the running Director could now gram two additional
extensions in the following mrs to extend it up to November 30, 1995,
Staff will comct ell 8ppilcanta who will be able to avail themselves of these additional time
extensions.
FISCAL IMPACT
Adoption of this Ordinance could result in · positive focal impact in that it will provide
businesses additional time in which to obtain funding and begin construction of their projects.
Attachments:
Resolution No. 94- - Page 3
Ordinance No. 94- - Page 6
Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 11
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOIJY/X)N NO. 94-
iI.E~IJ]'I~N OF 'lIKE CrrY COUNCIL OF Tmr- CITY OF
'rmM~'~ IECO~ING ADOFI*KON OF AN
Olfi]~!ANCI ~ 'INE La.v~ ~ CODE'
KEGA~J~ING THE TEIM OF PLOT FLANS,
wn,:-ar. As, City No. 90-04 ponioa ofdm non..
codre,-4 Rivehide Comny O, dh~-,V;~l, h~Ju~M' OXdh,~-e NO. ~ ('IJnd Use Code*); mad
wH,:,~As. such feg-aod,.,.,. provide for e-~*sm,, of dane fur plot plans. ccmdido,,oa
use permits, and lmblic use ~.its; and
W- m*.-~.An, the 0ty of Temecmk wishes to provide for an -4mdoe-a period of time to
aJlow for the developmeat of r.~o,~ad ad'oje. As; mud
w~, a public !,e,,,inf was cors4~ m D~cmb~' 6, 1993, 3muary 7..5, 1994
and Febna~ 22, 1994 at which time iniz~..Zd lmms had m c~,amity to testify either in
W-.,xr-L.q, aXim of Ibe t,,., .~axe d Oz,~,,-,,ce. wupomed sX City l:bn; County Library,
Rancho ~ ]~anch, b U.S. Post Office and-the Temec',,1,~ Valley Ch-mber of
Commerce; and
NOW, Tm~gsrORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CrrY OF IlMECULA
DOES RE~LVE, D~ AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the City Co-,,m'~ of the City of Te,~d- hett~ finds that theze are no
Cottory ca~ l~nlniu_e fluat W0qid~ be able IO IIVI~ tl~--]~ Of ~ m,4di~(mml e~'f~,nd~ll Of
Secdon2. 11at the City Co,-,,~'~ of the City (d* Temnec, d- hereby finds that the lh~bTl..osed
Ox'din~nCe providing for two
City of
Section 3. Tlmt t!~ City Coo,w41 of the City of Tewr, d, berdxy finds that this
Ordinance is ererapt through Sectio~ 21080 of the California Bn'~.o~..-A~! Q.ality Act.
of the proFse~l o-Mi~o.,--~ e,xte,,~;o~ of time (:):~,,-,-,ce. The O-~,,,-,ct is inc~t,o,.-,ttd into this
m.,a"r ' - Sn&'N.d. 4
RONALD ROke,-KxS
MAYOR
I Hs,'~t':*'Y CER13FY that the ft,.y.~oin$ lmesnh**ima was duly adoptal by the City
CmmciloftbeCityofTemepn-atazeZular ..4:,~.~ thereof, !r. ld oa the 22nd day of F, ebmary,
1994 by the ~ vote artbe
AYHS:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
ORDINANCE NO. ~.__
AN ORDINANCE OF 'HIE CHT COUNCIL OF ~ CITY,.
OF 'I~fB(:XTXA AMDO)ING 'tHE 'LAND 'USE CODE
U~'-AUnmTG Tim ~ OF CONDITIONAL USE
TsTR CITY COUNCIL Olr Tire CElT OF I]RN[BCULA DOES I:FFns~Ry
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
· "'ee"~_ L Article XV]IX, Section 18.30(0 of Rivedde Comt_ty Ordi,,.-,~e No.
348, as adopted by zt.f~unc¢ Ismsuant to City Ofu~e,.e No. 9004, and as om,~ded pursuant
to City Chdi,,-..z No. 91-09, b hereby -..-,~V./i ID trod as follows:
"f. AFPROVEDPHRXOD. Tmat~o~alofapiotplanslmllbevalidfora
Pl°tmiQr Dbeclor may il,~ovc, .cc=.'r. eic--:..,tly at.s-"o~c off deny the Itpplirtion.
An atcnsion of time may be tr~n'~tl by b p!~mlnf ~ only upon a
d:k4(,:...i.u.t;Cm tlmt the ps'xe~.rt'y and use are COn~i~t wida die ("~me, e-I FJaa.,
Land Use Ch,41~-;--e,, and all' other City Ch~.,=~cs and x=g-~-dom, If an
Them "use" shall memt tbe bc, e;..,,'d.¢ of s
that is -.;.-~ri-ed. wbich
ct-.,pk~.',% ar b actual oc~,t-,~y of e~.s~ L..-'mh~ ef bnd antler tenas of
the~use. b~daw~ofaltlxphn~bod~ ....
to Secdoe 18.26 of this
· "'ec"_,~ 2. Article XVIII, St-so,, 18.280) of O~di.~..,,cc No. 348, as adopted by
zeference pursuant So City 0Zdln,.,~ NO. 90-04, is haeby omeSd~ tO zmd as follows:
zSdl appiiratlem for lit tallfflSjlMl Of ~ dia]l be Iliade tO the pbmnin.a Dh~ctor,.
laqennhV Diam nay at,zxo'vc, coe~ny ~zaovc or deny the aplpHc-don.
An 'ertm~im of time 'may be ~ by tlz phmsln_m Dizecn' only upon a
:ZAild UI2 C)X(!i,i"~ihC¢, 131d 911 Olh~ ~ Oldigegeel lad feedrations. ff aD
ex/aHionbF'anted, the mtal time allowed for use of the aMmxoval shall not
approval
The term marine" ~ memn tile k_A;.h-.int (air · subslandml ~ of the mime
that is -,~.imrlmed, m4iich amlixucdml must Ih~tafh. J be Imxsued dii~grmfiy tO
the onebodmed ume. 'Xlae eltective date of a CO, n,HdOmq ~ permit shall be
"ection 3. Article XVUT; Sec,i~ 18.29(e) of C)~n99oe No. ~48, as adopted by
refaencc punamnt.to City (kdln,mce No. 90-04, is hereby ,,merv:tat to read as follows:
'e. APPROVI~rsPHR[OD. The ~ of a public use pexmit shall be valid
for a period of two years from its effective date wilhin which time the
~ authorized must be subssmntln!!y Ix~tm or the OCCb~,anCy -,~'hoxl,ed
NOtwithteh-..'tint the fOx~oin2, the p2,'mitlK my, lador to the ea~ of the
public me pamit, spply for up to thass (~), ooe (1) year extendo~s of tires in
An mpplication for an' ea~,don of time daall be anade to the ps-nnln£ IXzec~,
ma farms provided by the pao,ml,xf Depamnent and shall be filed with the
pi-nnha.a Dt.pruCh,AfiL, 8cco,,l~s.~;t~l by tim mt,p, oia;slc filing fee. Within thix~
m:wrAnmmx. Ax~_ ~ ~ e, 8
Section 18.26 of
x~n.~'J pursuant m ti~ pnxz, d~,. set forth above. In ordm' to A:6,-~ any such permit, tb~
permittee must mala~ an at~li~ Iv A.i,.-,~u. within 180 days of ti~ effective da~ of this
Ordinnnm.
Fectk-, S. ~ev~-b~y. If any lmmvisiom of this Opf,-,,,-e or tb~
thefeof to any period or citcm,,e*,,,'e is held invalid, such inva!Mity shall not affect other
severable.
publish a ~Ummsry Of thl= O/dl.d.,-,C II~ a C.~ai~'zr~i COpy Of flip ~ 23I Of fil~ ~~ zhall :,
~~. W~n 15 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a
3unc S. GTeek, City. Clark
[SEAI,]
STATB OF CAI. II~!INIA )
COUNT~ OF iU'v'ItR.~DB )
CmT~O~~ )
tt
nmdingatangularmmi~oftlmCityCountimtthe__dayof ,1994, and that
of the City of Trmrc, d- m tl~ __ day of,1994, by the follow~ wll call vote:
AYEq:
NOBS:
ABSENT:
· 1-'~ z ross, e. 10
A'rTACHMENT N0. 3
PLANNIN8 COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MBdORAI~UM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
December 6, 1993
SUBJECT:
Prepared by:. Dabble Ubnod2
RECOMMENDATION:
~ Adoe, d:i. dg ;"wld. eiOn 93-
Moptim of an Ordinmmm maltlad:
BACKGROUND
At tim April 5, 1993 !alarming Canmission Maat~. staff mco.,.,~m,,dkl that the Commiuion
amend Ordinance 340 to allow for two adJitie.~l one year mxtm'miorm of time. Same
concerns were mad by the Commimion mt l~e ,,jatjng releive To e.,.m,~iing the life. of
I~rojec',s tm Commission had never Hen.
Staff researched City approvals for the period from April 1990 to June 1990 which was the
period of time The City Counmq acted soleW to aimrow or deny projects. During this period.
t~e City Council acted on eight County b-.,~l.e.,.ed ;dot Fins. No conditional use or'lmblic
use permizs were acted on. Of the eight Idat llsa acted on, all haw either been constnacmd
or ave expired.
AT the concltmion of the Planning C~.,,,.i~ion Me.q. the ~ ~,,;;q] Cc,...,,Luion dimc'tm:l
staff to prepare an Ordinance providing for two add;lSm' -I yearn to allow almlicanm additional
time to c~ their mcm. C~,.,,i~i~rjr Hagland m c,~n.g d to m~ch an 0rclh~,~_w.
He felt giving applicants an additional two years was not in the City's best i. 4crbts.
DISCUSSION
it is stmff's opinion that the five year 8~pro, I ~rcc t is would benefit Ixjai..e raw by providing
them additional Time in which to obtain hating and begin cormreaction. It is further .staff';
onimon Zl'mt them are no cases mmairing from the County which would be able to
ztmmseives of this additional tifne.
Section 4 of 'the attached Ordinance tallows pen'nit'tees to mOLleft reins'tat],,,],A Of exph"ed
City apl~:wecl applications within six .,,,,.Ahs of ttw dam thin Goutrag adolgs this 'Ordil w,__m.
The reip. s'm'mmertt hearing will be conducted by the ~ Director. For exmngsb, if tl'm City
had approved a conditional use perillit on the date of incorporation, Decmnbm' 1, 1989. the
permit would have expired on November :30, 1991. Under Section 4 .ofthis Ordinance, the
Planning Director could gram the peffnittee up to three one-year extensions .of time. The
effect of this would be to extand the permit to November 3C), 1994. If the conditional use
permit hid been approved on Decenber 1, 1990 and had expired on November 30, 1992, the
Planning Director could now grant otto m~mmion mt 1t~ time To mcmnd ~he mtnniT to
Novaminer 30, 1~g3, and than gram two mddidorml Imlmjm~ in thm following-.years to
extend it up to Novumkmr 30, 10~. :.
Adoption of This Ordinance is exBmpt JJ,rc~h SBcdoff 21080 ofthe California Environmeal
Quality Act.
ATtachments
Resolution No. 9~,._.- Dim'Page
Ordinance No. 9~,..,.,- Blue Page
I~w-~OLUTION OF I:BE ~~ COMMISSION OF IEE
CHT OF .rn'M~~ nT'r'rXuMEqDING ,rn'r. CHT
LAND 13SX (lIDS)r;.c.-*srnlNG Twr- ~ERM OF FLOT
?LAN~, ~muNA~ ~ ~ AX~ FI:!SLIC USX
.wx,:-~.,.~, the Cit7 orTe,-t~k wishes m lsmide fern *,;,.de,,*z peziod of time w
:aZlow for the dew~,.~.~t of appmved l,,,,jc.,-~ and
wr, ,:~r-,tS, · public bexdn2 was co,-4-"*"~ ass I:1~, ..,b · 6, .I~Y~, ax which
inufft. sr~l persons had an ~ ..... :,y m areairy either in **xpfert or ut,r,~;~;,~,~ and
wx,.:-~&S, nod~aftlm~,,...ns/O, Ac.--.-,e was lxmed at City l:hm. Conmy. Lt'brdsT,
~anr. ho r-.fcrmia mrs-,.% the U.S. ~ Otfuz assEl the Tew-.e-k Valley Clamber of
NOW, TFr~OKE, ~ FIAlqNING COMM~ON OF Twu crff OF
TEMXCULA DOES ~zx~-qOLVE, D~ AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the Plannhx2 re~'~'~ ef We C, ky of Tern,w-x- bffeby finds that
there ~ no Co~ ~ ,~...-;..;.,g ~ w~ ~ ~ m ~ ~~ d ~
cxx~io~ d
Section Z. Trot the 1~-,,,~ Commlqion of the City of Temec',.~- ~ fn~ the the
proposed Or,~-,we pzova,.,,Z for two ,ddlti,.w,-~ one year e~m.,,~,w,s of time will beme~
bu~.,esx~ ~ the Cky of Tc.,..'~b
Section3. That the Pla,,,,i,~ r'c, ......;,.so- ofdse Ctty ofTemee-b haey fmds thaz tWs
Orcii,,,,nce is exempt tlmm2ts Secxian 21080 of the r'-"fm'nia Tm~;.,.- .......,.! Qutlit7 AEL
Section 4. Tamz dze~ Co ......
to the Ciz7 CoEzil -d,&.-+o- of the F,,.,~,r,d ,,,r,:^..-: ~., ...:,,, o~ time ~.--..cc. The
Ord~n:-ce is inco. l.,u.~.j:! into thle p,.sosm'irm by dais .~z.,..,,c8 and .... .~,, d r-tM'hiX "A' Ind
dzted Dec..~ber 6, 1993, for
AYSS:
NOF:S:
yr..A.NND~
:FL4MNING COD,rmm~*~ONm~_~:
:F~tMM:Z:NG C~*~Olq~.S:
GAEY ~0~ _t
O~.D3NANCE NO
AN ORDINANCE OF TEE crlT CO13NC!L OF Tn?- (:lIT
OF 'fTMT~ LMI:NDING ~ LAIqD 13SE CODE
REGiRDING ~ ~ OF CONnmnHAI, 13I:
Tm;: ~ COIINClL OF ~ (:lIT OF TEIVITf~T-e, DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
to C. ix'y O.,.,4:..:..."c No. 91-.~, b beeby .: .....,,:k4 m ned ss Jo]ksws:
in~~ only.
P~-,.-,~g Dbccmr nmy. ,,x.,p,,-c, ¢-.-~:,.,--~y -x.,.r,,.,,c or deny tie
· An exw,,slcm of time my be ~ by the x ~, ....:.-,_ Dh'ecmr on~ upon a
Land Use Ch.i;.--..,-e, sad all odzr City Ol,~.-,..~-, and xt.f-~ If an
cr~d a paiod of five.(5) yesn, c-i,-,k,,-4hom xbe effeaive dale of tie
in which to nm the pimpin. ~ ,--" -.-;"^ oftin~ ,.~n b~ F--zd in one (1)
i,-,,,,b~ n~,-.,, ....4, -,.c,--~-,,'-4 by the ,,,,p,~,;axc frn~_ fee. W',,h~ mbty
(30) days loWowing. the fn;,,_, d an ,t4>nc .,c.,_, for an ,-',,~ of time. the
'An, ,,~ ..-:,,-. d dine nmy be :,._.,,~ by the F- .....:-. Z;:.,,,A,, only upon a
The tern "use' sbxll rams= the t~s: .... ;.~, of a s,,bo.-.d;.~ ~,,h.cdon oftbe use
thaz is -,~hf.+,~ which ramminion nms: fJ~Af~ be
~ .,,~ho~,.d u.m. Th~ ~ dam of a c~...,~t:o..ud
dezrmined punant xo Sm 18.26 of this
Section 3. Anick XVIIL Sec,lo- 18.29(e) of OxfH~e No. 348, as adopted by
refcmnc~ pursuam to Cizy G,.l~,,-..ce No. 90-04, is ha'elF/-mended to mad as follows:
"c. APPSOViDPZBXOD. TlzqVmuldalmnblicnsepmd:sbxtlbevalid
for a period of two years fTmn its etiective daxe wh,,i wtch time the
casmsc~m .,~,~ nsua be F,bf-miany beim or the oc.,Ap-...cy --,hcm+~
R:titiTA~ 11,~1~3 IB
8
o o.
,,'i,,T, ....;..amim)., thE: the ~,,,p,,,m,.,.v aid rise lie co..-;-.,- ^~ wil:h tile
,,~,-.-;~, b ~ tie mmal time aDoseed for m~'of :t~ ~
:tFoqS- "
v""'-"' m Scm:mion 18,26 ofthi 0,~.'*---
provisions or at~X"sd"a% sad .m Ibis end, the pmvisiam ef tlsis (h~.--.,ce m ~ to be
9
juries-. Gzeek,
STATS 01: C0~ )
COTmTY al: ~n )
crn, oF~ )
mid C~ .....ce was duty *,taFwu and lnssed at azemslar,,,ee*~ aftbe Cit'y
COUNr'Tr
NOrmS:
COUNr'Tr ~lc'm.~:.
COT,.I'Nrq"r
10
ITEM NO. 13
APPROVAL
CITY ATFORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
·
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
April 5, 1994
An Ordinance to reduce water consumption through efficient landscape design,
consistent with provisions of AB 325.
PREPARED BY: John Meyer, Senior Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
Open Public Hearing and continue to April 26, 1994 City Council Meeting.
BACKGROUND
Staff is requesting this item to be continued to allow staff and the City Attorney an
opportunity clarify a few issues. This item was noticed as a public hearing therefore it must
be opened to public testimony.
R:~STAFFRI~.CC 3/30/94 Idb 1
ITEM NO. lzl-
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPRO~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
April 5, 1994
Procedures and Recommendations for Notice of Public Hearing
Prepared By:
Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
Provide Direction to Staff regarding the Implementation of Notice
of Public Hearing Procedures
BACKGROUND
Planning Staff was directed by the City Council to review present Notice of Public Hearing
(NOPH) procedures. Staff conducted this review of the following issue areas: in-house
generation of adjacent homeowner notification labels, a revised NOPH flyer, a criteria for a
standard exhibit for the vicinity map contained on the NOPH flyer, a new sign for posting the
site, and additional exposure in the newspaper, posting the site upon application submittal and
minimum number of residents to be notified.
Staff presented an assessment of the' current procedures for handling NOPH, as well as
suggestions for improving the process to the Planning Commission on March 21, 1994
(Planning Commission minutes are not available as of the date of this report).
The Planning Commission concurred with Staff recommendations for the following items: in-
house generation of adjacent homeowner notification labels, a revised NOPH flyer, a criteria
for a standard exhibit for the vicinity map contained on the NOPH flyer, a new sign for posting
the site, and additional exposure in the newspaper. Examples of new signs for posting the site
have been included as Attachment No. 2. Two designs are for posting the NOPH (one has a
map with the location of City Hall on it). Another design contains the hearing body and the
date of the hearing. An exhibit has been prepared for a Notice of Application Submittal.
The Planning Commission was split in terms of posting the site upon application submittal.
They voiced concerns about potential length of time that signs could remain posted on the site
(i.e., some Specific Plans could be posted up to several years), the effectiveness of the
posting at application submittal time and potential maintenance costs for the signs.
The Commission recommended that Staff devise specific criteria for determining the minimum
number of residents to be notified. Although the Commission felt that it was important to
inform adjacent residents of pending hearings, they felt that to notify residents based on a
specific number of residents was arbitrary.
R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH-2.CC 3/2~/9~ kLb 1
FISCAL IMPACT
Fiscal impacts listed below are based upon thirty-one (31) Planning Commission and twenty
(20) City Council items that needed to be posted in 1993. Potential impacts from
implementing the above referenced procedures are as follows:
Cost for posting site for Notice of Application Submittal: ~50.00 per posting (Add
approximately ~ 12.00 per sign for specific use) Total: ~3162.00
Cost for fabricating/replacing Notice of Application Submittal signs: ~ 150.00 per sign.
Assumption is that twenty (20) signs will be needed. Total: ~3000.00.
Cost for posting site for Notice of Public Hearing: $50.00 per posting (Add
approximately $15.00 per sign for specific use and specific hearing date). Total:
~3315.00.
Cost for fabricating/replacing Notice of Public Hearing signs: $150.00 per sign.
Assumption is that twenty (20) signs will be needed. Total: $3000.00.
Total approximate cost for new signs/posting for application submittal/Notice of Public
Hearing: $12,477.00.
Approximate cost for Staff to generate notification labels in-house: ~125.00 (to be
passed on to the applicant).
Attachments:
Planning Commission Staff Report March 21, 1994- Page 3
Noticing Sign Exhibits - Page 4
R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH-2.CC 31~1~4 k|b 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MARCH 21, 1994
R: \STAF FRPT \NOPH - Z. CC 3/Z9/96 k t b 3
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning Commission
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
March 21,1994
Planning Department Procedures for Noticing
ReCommendations for Improving the Noticing Process
Public Hearings and
Prepared By:
Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner
Linda Beaudoin, Planning Technician
RECOMMENDATION:
REVIEW the attached Staff Report on Current Notice of Public
Hearing Procedures
RECOMMEND a Notice of Public Hearing Procedure to the City
Council
BACKGROUND
Planning Staff has been directed by the City Council to review present Notice of Public Hearing
(NOPH) procedures. Staff has conducted this review and will present an assessment of the
current procedures for handling NOPH as well as suggestions for improving this process.
DISCUSSION
Current NOPH Procedure
The current procedure fir NOPH ,is as follows:
Notification Labels: Staff receives the notification labels as part of the application
submittal. The guidelines for preparing the notification labels are included with the
application and are attached as Attachment No. 1. These labels are typically prepared
for the applicant by a Title Company and a certification letter must accompany the
labels (Reference Attachment No. 2). Projects that will be heard by the Planning
Director require property owners within a 300 foot radius from the project be notified.
Those projects that will go before the Planning Commission and/or the City Council
require property owners within a 600 foot radius from the project be notified. The
labels are verified by staff to be accurate and that they reflect the correct area to be
notified. Notices are mailed to the property owners within the proper radius from the
site. This notice is also attached to the sign that is posted on the site.
R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH,PC 3/15/W, ktb 1
Notification of Homeowner's Associations Within the Project Area: Staff has recently
started notifying Homeowners Associations (HOA) that may be affected by the project
at the Development Review Committee (DRC) level. Staff determines which HOA's are
affected by the project by reviewing the City's HOA map and assessing those HOA's
that abut the project or take access from the same road as the project. A letter is then
mailed to the Association along with a copy of the proposed project. A City Staff
contact person is named in the letter.
Posting of the Site: The site is posted with a 4' high by 4' wide bright yellow sign prior
to the date of the hearing body. Depending upon noticing requirements imposed by
state law, the sign will be placed upon the site 10, 20, or 30 days prior to the hearing.
Additional Notification: In addition to the above methods of noticing property owners
and HOA's that may be affected by development proposals, the project is also noticed
at the following places:
a. In front of City Hall;
b. At the Temecula Library;
c. At the Temecula Town Association; and
d. In The Californian Newspaper.
Recommended Chanqes to the Current NOPH Procedure
Alternative Sources of Notification Labels: Staff has looked into acquiring the
notification labels from a source other than Title Companies. Two alternative sources
of notification labels are discussed below. A third option would be to encourage the
Title Companies to include a standard exhibit in their package that would afford Staff
the opportunity to spot check the validity of the labels.
In-House Generation of Labels. Staff has the capability of generating the
notification labels in-house. The process would involve the time of the
Information Systems Administrator, the Case Planner, and an Office Assistant.
Materials would include the Assessor's Pages, labels and a form to fill out to
give to the Information Systems Administrator. Estimated current cost for this
process would be approximately 9200.00 per application. Currently, it is also
estimated that Staff will have the time to generate the labels. The benefit from
using this process is that it would place the responsibility for this function on
the Planning Staff to assure that the notification labels are correct and
complete.
Outside Contractual Service. Staff was contacted by an individual who will 'also
provide the service of generating the notification labels. They have stated that
they have started to provide this service for Title Companies. They currently
charge 91 .00 per label with a minimum charge of 975.00 per project. The
benefit from this service is that there is a specific individual that will be held
responsible for the accuracy of the labels. The shortcoming of this system is
that the cost could be expensive for applicants.
R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 311519~ ktb 2
Standard exhibit for radius package. One other option is to create new criteria
for the Title Companies to follow that will assure that the correct information
is supplied to Staff. One way to accomplish this would be to require them to
provide an exhibit (the Assessor's Index Page) in the submittal that would show
the parcel in question along with all of the parcels-within the specific radius
range. An example of this is included as Attachment No. 3. In addition to
showing the radius and each parcel, they would also have to (identify on the
exhibit) all of the Assessor's pages. Staff feels that this option would resolve
the problems that we have been experiencing in the past.
Revised NOPH Ryer. Staff has created a revised NOPH notice that is mailed to the
affected property owners (Reference Attachment No. 4 for current notice and
Attachment No. 5 for the revised notice). The new features are listed below.
New layout. The new notice contains a much larger font for the words "Notice
of Public Hearing." In addition, the words Notice of Public Hearing will be
located next to the return address on the outside of the notice. The vicinity
map is located in a box in the center of the notice.
Bright color. Staff recommends that the notice be printed on bright paper that
will over time automatically trigger a response in people's minds that this is an
important item that has been sent to them from the City of Temecula.
Ce
Standard Criteria for Exhibit for Vicinity map. Staff has prepared standard
criteria for the Vicinity map for the.notice (see Attachment No. 6). The vicinity
map will clearly call out the main streets in the area. In addition, the site will be
shaded, with the word "site" in large print and an arrow showing the location
of the site.
New Sign. A new design for the sign that used for posting the site ha~ been explored
as another way of increasing the visibility for projects. Staff recommends that the sign
continue to be the same size as previous used (4' high x 4' wide) and the same bright
yellow color. The top of the sign should include in bold letters what is being proposed.
This information should be in plain language and brief in its description (i.e.,
PROPOSED CHURCH or PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER). This information should be
visible to motorists while in their cars. Below this would be the words "Notice of
Public Hearing." Also needed on the sign should be the City Seal, notice information,
the City's address and phone number and a directional map to City Hall.
Staff is requesting direction as to the type of sign that the Commission would prefer
to see posted on the site. Typical costs and prototype signs for new signs have
obtained from a sign company and are included as Attachment No. 7.. A ~45.00
charge is currently levied by the sign company that is under contract with the City to
post sites.
Posting of Site Upon Application Submittal. In addition to posting the site for a Notice
of Public Hearing, the site may also be posted upon submittal of an application. The
anticipated- benefit from posting the site early in the process is that the adjacent
property owners will be afforded additional notification and time to respond to the
project before it goes to public hearing. A shortcoming of this is that the posting of
R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 3/15/96 ktb 3
the site for application submittal will be more costly that posting the site for the Public
Hearing.
Additional Exposure in the Newspaper. The Californian was contacted to determine
how and whether additional coverage may be provided for the Public Hearing items
within the City of Temecula. Staff inquired into the possibility of including hearing
information in the front page index. The spokesperson for the Californian is still in the
process of determining if this is possible. A synopsis of the meeting agendas can be
placed in the Government Meeting Section of The Californian if specific newspaper
deadlines are met (Reference Attachment No. 8).
Minimum Number of Residents to be Noticed. In some instances, the number of
affected property owners within a 300 foot or 600 foot radius from a given project is
a very small number (i.e., between 5-10 separate property owners). Some
municipalities have a minimum number of property owners (approximately 30) to be
notified. This will assure that a satisfactory number of affected property owners will
be notified of projects in their area.
Attachments: ·
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Required Property Owners Notification Information - Blue Page 5
Property Owners Certification - Blue Page 6
Standard Exhibit for Radius Package - Blue Page 7
Current Notice of Public Hearing - Blue Page 8
Revised Notice of Public Hearing - Blue Page 9
Standard Vicinity Map for Notice of Public Hearing - Blue Page 10
Costs for Types of Noticing Signs and Prototype Signs- Blue Page 11
Example of Government Meeting Section of The Californian - Blue Page 12
R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 3/15/94 ktb 4
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
REQUIRED PROPERTY OWNERS NOTIFICATION INFORMATION
R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 3/15/9~, ktb 5
REQuI~k'n PROPERTY OWNERS NOTIFICATION.INFORMATION
The following items will be required at the rime of fBing of the above noted case application:
TWO identical packages to be inserted in scparaxe 9 1/2" x 12 1/2" w~-ih envelopes.
These envelopes shah indicate the case number and the word "labels," and shall contn{n
the following:
be
One typed set of gnmmed labels indicating all the property owners'
names sad the raniliaE ~es that are within a 600-foot rodins
of the enezior of the proposed project (this list shall be ascerr:~ined
from the last eq~mliTed assessment roll). For Projects under
10,000 square feet in size AND requiring a planning ~or's
Heazing, a 300-foot radius package is needed
A photocopy of the aforementioned labels.
One label for the representative and/or engineer.
One hbel for the owner.
Four typed sets of gummed labels of the owner, engineer, and representative with their
rn~iling addresses. Do not include duplicate sets where rrpresentative and owner, etc.,
arc the same. These should be inserted in a letter-sized envelope and stapled to the
outside of one of the large manila envelopes mentioned in item 1 above.
Certification by the title company, engineer, or surveyor that the above list is complete
and accurate. The Tax Assessor' s Office will not prepare or certify the property owner
list (see certification form attached).
On a copy of your exhibit or tentative map show all parcels within 600/300 feet. On the
map, print the names of all property owncr~ within 600/300 feet as they are listed on the '
CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PROPERTY OWNERS CERTIFICATION
R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 3/15/9~ ktb 6
PRO~T~Z O~VN]~ CI~'t'~xCATION
I, ,cexlifytt~ton ,theattached
(Print Hams) (mouth-day-year)
propew/ownerslistwasl by
(Prin~ company or individual's name)
pursuant to application xequizemcnts fisrni,~hed by the City of Temecula Planning Deparuncnt.
Said list is a complete and true compilation of owner of the' subject property and all other
property owners within 6)0500 feet of the property involved in the application and is 'based
upon the ]ale~ ej:l,-~li'yx,.d a.~Se,~Sme-nt milS.
I further certify that the information filed is tree and corr~ to the best of my knowledge. I
understand that incorrect or erroneous information may be grounds for rejection or denial of the
application.
NAME:
TITr ,~GISTRATION:
ADDRESS:
PHONE:
SIGNATURE:
DATE:
-CASE NO.:
(Sa.m. -Sp.m.)
CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
STANDARD EXHIBIT FOR RADIUS PACKAGE
R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 3/15/9z, ktb 7
,/
.®
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
CURRENT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 3/15/~ ktb
8
Notice of Public Heariv4,
~ CITY OF TEMECULA
43174 Business Park Drive
Temeeula, CA 92590
A PUBLIC I~!~ARING has been scheduled before the PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the
matter(s) described below.
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Planner:
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Planner:
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commi-q$ion before the hearing(s) or may
appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing.
If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised a~ the public hearing(s) described in this notice, or in wri~en correspondence
delivered to the p]nnnlng Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing(s). The proposed project
application(s) may be viewed at the public information counter, Temecula Planning Deparunent, 43 174
Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 9:00 AM until 4:00 PM. Questions concerning the
project(s) may be addressed W the case planner at the City dTemeoula p|nnning Deparmlent, (909) 694-
6400.
The time, place and date of the hearing(s) are as follows:
PLACE OF !~ARING:
DATE OF HEARING:
~ OF Ft~ARING:
Vail Elementary School
29915 Mira Loma Drive
Temecula, CA
6:00 p.m.
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
REVISED NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 3/15/9~
9
Public Hearing
A PUBLIC mt. AR~NG has been scheduled before
COMMF, SION to eomider the matter described below:
~ No:
Applicant:
Location:
theCITYOF'I~I~r, CHLA
HANNING
F.,llvironmentai Action:
Planner:.
Recommendation:
vacin Map
SEE ATTACHMENT NO. 6
PLACE OF HKAR1NG:
DATE OF WI~.ARING:
lIME OF nvARING:
Vail Elmsamy ff--~e at, 2991.5 lVfira Lama Drive, Tememh, CA
· Z1994
6.-00PM
Any person may submit writran comments to ths l~.,.i._~ Commission before tlaz hesxing(s) or may sppesr sad be heed in support
of or opposition to the spprovsl of the project(s) at the time of hesring. ~you dsamge ssy o/the proyazs ~s court, you ssy ke
//m/2d to ra/~g on/y thou/uua you or soreezra dze ra/sed at tht pub//c hmrin~s) ~/n :h/: ~ or/n mqazrz
correspo~ ~d_~vered to ths. ~ Commission at, or prior to, the publ~ Imrinl(s). The p,~pos~t project application(s)
may be viewed at the public information countzr, T mmcula PLtnning D,p,,ta,at 43 174 Businmm Park Drive, Monday though l:tiday
fr"" 9:00 AM until 4:00 PM. Questions concmming the project(s) may be addrinsed to at the City of Temecula
E ~mS Deparunent, (909) 694-6400.
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
43174 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
TEME~, CA 9259O
NOTICE
OF
PUBLIC HEARING
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
STANDARD VICINITY MAP FOR NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 3/15/9z, ktb 10
~.PROJECT AREA SHADED
BOLD
WORD '-
'SITE
"AND
ARROW
VISTA RD
it m
%.
RD
MAJOR '
fSTREE'rS '
IDENTIFIED
I
I
NORTH ARROW
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
COSTS FOR TYPES OF NOTICING SIGNS AND PROTOTYPE SIGNS
R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 3/15/9~ kib 11
SIGN SINGLE ANNUAL
TYPE CASE COST COST
SEM/- $150.00 Material & construction 100 Signs $15,000.00
PERMANENT 50.00 planning Commission posting 100 Signs 5,000.00
SIGN :50.00 City Council posting (ff necessary) 30 Signs approx. 1.500.00
$21,500.00
PER 10 Signs # $1,500.00
MEETING $ 50.00 Planning Commission posting 100 Signs 5,000.00
POSTING 50.00 City Council posting (if necessary) 30 Signs approx. 1,500.00
PER 10 Signs # $1,500.00
MEETING $ 50.00 Planning Commission posting 100 Signs 5,000.00
POSTING 12.00 @ Large lettering for meeting date 1,200.00
(Meeting Date 50.00 City Council posting (ff necessary) 30 Signs approx. 1,500.00
Posted in 12.00 @ Large lettering for meeting date 1.200.00
large letters) $10,400.00
Assumes replacement rate of ten signs/year (may be less)
R:~PLANNINll%SIONS.Cl!T 3111/94 sdl
SEMI-PERMANENT SIGN
PROPOSED USE: 200.600 Weeam. Mater.
Zone Ckll!~l: bide lI~ll INI. II Commercial
PublicHEaring Notice
CITY
OF
TEffiECULA
For inlermetion contact:
Temecule Plannlng Department
4:$174 Business Park Drive
Temecele, CA 92591
(gOg) 694-6400
a. Sign goes up at time of application.
b. Planning Commission Meeting notice posted.
c. City Council Meeting notice posted (if required).
d. Sign removed after final action.
SIGN COST
Single Case Cost
$150.00 Material &construction 100 Signs
50.00 Planning Commission posting 100 Signs
50.00 City Council posting (if necessary)30 Signs (approx.)
$250.00
Advantages:
- Constant public information dudng review process.
Disadvantages:
- Vandalism and maintenance.
- Higher costs to applicants.
- Sign clutter around city.
- Posting of headng notices would largely go unnoticed.
Annual Cost
$15,000.00
5,000.00
1.500.00
$21,500.00
. PER MEETING POSTING
PROIqIEP USE: 2~O,llO wfwemm. e4mter.
/
PublicHeaPing Notice
CITY
OF
TEriECULA
For infermarion contact:
TameCOle Planlog DePartment
43 174 Business Pert Drive
Ternscale, CA 92591
(90g) 694-6400
ae
Sign goes up pdor to Planning Commission meeting,
Planning Commission hearing notice posted.
Sign removed after Planning Commission meeting.
Sign goes up pdor to City Council meeting, City Council
-headng notice posted (if necessary).
d. Sign removed after final action.
SIGN COST
Single Case Cost*
10 Signs#
50.00 Planning Commission posting 100 Signs
50.00 City Council posting (if necessary)30 Signs (approx.)
$100.00
Annual Cost
$1,500.00
5,000.00
1.500.00
$8,000.00
*re-usable signs #Assumes replacement rate
of ten signs/year (may be less).
Advantages:
- "Up" time is reduced, minimizing potential for vandalism and sign clutter.
- Signs am recycled, reducing costs to applicants.
- Placement of sign structure catches attention easier than posting of notice on
existing sign..
Disadvantages:
- Shorter overall window of time for public noticing.
PER MEETING POSTING
PI~BPOS[D USE: 2Oa.OO0 of eoem. mr.
Zm. Cheul8: Ileddeulld-dl. to Coetamrdel
Public Hearing Notjce
'O CITY
OF
TEHECULA
CitU Council rieeting~ Feb. 8. 1994
For Informallea contact:
TimeCUll Plealag Department
43174 Business Perk Drive
Tern,cola.. Ca 92591 694-6400
Sign goes up pdor to Planning Commission meeting,
Planning Commission hearing notice posted.
b. Sign removed after Planning Commission meeting.
Sign goes up pdor to City Council meeting, City Council
hearing notice posted (if necessary).
d. Sign removed after final action.
SIGN COST
Single Case Cost* Annual Cost
10 Signs# $1,500.00
50.00 Planning Commission posting 100 Signs 5,000.00
12.00@ Large lettering for meeting date 1,200.00
50.00 City Council posting (if necessary)30 Signs (approx.) 1,500.00
19.00@ Large lettering for meeting date 1 .~00.00
$124.00 $10,400.00
*re-uSable signs #Assumes replacement rate
@ option of ten signs/year (may be less).
Advantages:
- "Up' time is reduced, minimizing potential for vandalism and sign clutter.
- Signs am recycled, reducing costs to applicants.
- Placement of sign structure catches attention easier than posting of notice on
existing sign.
Disadvantages:
- Shorter overall window of time for public noticing.
ATTACHMENT NO. 8
EXAMPLE OF GOVERNMENT MEETING SECTION OF THE CALIFORNIAN
R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 3/15/9A ktb 12
dents at Unfield School during a visit Tues-
day. The students were tzested to an explana-
of business services, said the
Upper made his cornmen:
iton of fire ~2htfn2 techniques as weal as
sofet~tlPsabeutwhattododndnga~xe.
iders animal rescue policy
ns and other animal shel- In an emergency, a Ranch- so that the rightful' owners
~uesday, ccunt~ adininis-
: officer Harry l:'nipps re-
I that veteran Animal
~1 CkiefEmmett Gibson
~ r-aj~combined with con-
citizens to save all ani-
ossible durin~ the recent
es.
~ private property need-
~ntered, it was,' said
._ 'A notice was left for
_~er stating that their an-
:-,d b~en removed, trod
'.hey could be picked
on said rescue efforts
· hindered by the lack of
ch Permit' process -- a
~ to be considered by the
Task Force for Domestic
Breeding.
Permit procured beforehand
could be posted on a Kate or
fence, authorizing animal con-
trol staff to enter the propertF
as needed to rescue
Phipps, however, questioned
the count~s liabili
· ' 'ty for ani-
mals that may perialx despite
proper postin~,and Gibson
maintained tha~ any Hisaster
rescue plan should be flexible
enough to allow his crew to deal
Gibson did support aman~,ng
the ccunty's .~;m~] shelter con-
tram to provide for emergency
situations, but at some addi-
tional cost.
Supervisors cited their des·r-'
es to have shelters hold rescued
animals for longor time periods
the California Parks
idiife Bond ACt of 1994
oes to voters in Junt'
pomtod a task force to
cat population conl~ol
ng a cat licensing pro-
Re 1st Dis~ric~ will be
ntod byMichelle Sheehe
D.istrict by Anne Wash-
~roved the sixth chan~e
the Minion Trail road
=~ project in Lake Elsin-
ne board approved
~or I'~BC CourTactors
!, rebury and pack
, ¢er existing sewer
der iVllssion Trail £ol-
subsidence pro. blems.
Change orders for the projecf
now total $178~180 or 8.23 per-
cent of the m'i~nn! pro~ect cost.
[] Approved a memorandum
of understanding between the
Mood Control District and U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers re-
~--'ding emergency response to
potential lake flooding at Lake
IReappointedJosephPhelps
of Temecula to the Distric~ 7
Mood Control and Water Con-
servation Comm~-sion. Phelps
has served on the
for three years and will now
serve to Oct. 31, 1996.
, ComOilecl by Chuck Harvey
could have a better chance to
els~im them. Also, the board
a~reed that animals should be
transported and held as near as
possible to their points of res-
In the Winchester and Ortega
area fires, most county-rescued
animals were taken either to
the Lake Elsinore Animal
Friends Shelter, 29001 Bastron
St., or P,~nona Animal Haven
at 690 Hn,--ne Way in San J:-
cinto. Dozens more were saved
by the ex~nsive rescue efforts
of volunteer residents -- such
as Debra Johnson of Winches-
ter, who used her own horse
porary boarding for several
horses left homeless by fire..
[] GOVERNMENTMEETING l
WildomarMunic|pal
Advisory Council
WILDOMAR--Thetown Munic/-
pal Adviso,/Council will meet al: ?
p.m. today in the Wlldomar Be-
mentary School, 21575 Palomar
St. The agenda includes:
[] County Supervisor Bob Buat-
er's mport on a possible re2{onai
park in Wildomar.
I Posting of Wildomar bound-
arysigns.
[] Establish liaison with county
Planning Commission.
mm Rood cordyoi planning com-
mittee.
Im Discuss m-up of NeiF~bor-
hood Watch program.
i Joint Powers Commission for
March Air Fome Base.
based on what appears a
double-edged sword: the $32.2
mflI~on increase is predicated
on MSJC increasing it~ per-
class unit fee fi~nn 213 to $20
end takin~ back about 215 raft-
lion by defundin~ students with
bachelors depress.
Mur~eta st
for morn
MURR~TA __ For the sec-
ond time in two months, resi-
dents are going to bat for a
Murrieta woman suEering
a debilitafiug blood
This time they actually w~!~
swing softhell I ts 'for l Erjori;
Winn, whose baffle with aplas-
tic anemia made headlines in
December and ushered in a
flood of community support..
'Everyone was so helpful, it
was just unbelievable,' said
Deb.bie McCabe, who helped or-
p-,e the December fund-rais.
ing 2mpaig
osity, the effort netted holiday
toys and clothing for th
family as well as $2,300 for a
family trust fund at First paclf.
[c Bank on W'mchester Road,
rution Com,-~qion last week
approved a two-day soitball
tournament torthe Wi-,, cause.
The coed, doublHlh-~--tion
event is set for Feb. 5 and 6 st
California Oaks Sports Park
Area businesses already have
donated items for a game-rela~
ed silent auction. Money made
from concession sales also will
benefit the Winns, McCabe
Organizers hope for 18
?
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
NOTICING SIGN EXHIBITS
R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH-2.CC 3/29/9~ kLb 4
Sign for Posting Notice of Public Hearing
Proposed Use:
SHOPPING CENTER
Public Hearing Notice
NOPH
Flyer
CITY
OF
TEMECULA
For information contact:
Temecula Planning Department
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
(909) 694-6400
ITEM NO. 15
APPROV/~v.
CITY ATTORNEY ~_
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
April 5, 1994
Community Services Funding Request Recommendations
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council 1 ) review and approve or revise the attached
recommendations in response to the applications received from community based
organizations, and 2) only consider requests from community based organizations once each
year in connection with this process.
DISCUSSION: At the meeting of March 22, 1994 Council appointed a Community
Services Ad Hoc Committee, Councilmembers Stone and Birdsall, to review requests for
funding from community service groups. Attached are the recommendations of the Ad Hoc
Committee, which amount to ~50,000from the City Council's social services funding, as well
as $10,000 in recommendations for the City's promotional budget.
The ad hoc committee has also strongly recommended that the City Council only consider
requests from community based organizations once each year in connection with this process.
FISCAL IMPACT: The unencumbered balance in the City Council discretionary
account is approximately $50,000. Sufficient funds exist in the RDA promotional budget to
fund the attached recommendations.
Attachments:
Community Service Funding Program Detail
ITEM 16
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER .
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
March 5, 1993
Private Bus Benches in Public Right-of-Way
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council provide direction to Staff regarding the placing of benches in the public
right-of-way.
BACKGROUND:
At the regular Public Traffic/Safety Commission meeting of January 28, 1993, the Commission
agreed by consensus to support a Sunrise Rotary Club project to place forty (40) bus benches
at existing bus stops on Ynez, Jefferson/Front, and Rancho California Road. The Rotary Club
would sell advertising on the benches and use the profits to increase the funding of their local
school scholarships and community projects. Subsequently, the Public Works Department
issued an encroachment permit and the Rotary Club installed the benches. However, several
benches were placed at locations that already had existing RTA benches and the difficulty in
relocating them to new locations cause the following issues to surface for Council
consideration·
Establishment of guidelines and procedures for placing benches in the public
right-of-way by organizations other than the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA).
2. The quantity of benches and their location.
3. Guidelines for permitting one organization over another to place such benches.
4. Coordination with RTA.
5. Relocation of duplicate benches at certain locations.
Assumption of liability by the organization receiving permission to place such
benches and time limits on monopoly by organization given the authority to
place benches in the public right-of-way.
-1- r:~egdq~94~O40S~aueben~h 032894ekg
If the Council chooses, the Staff can prepare a formal policy addressing the above items and
submit it for review at a subsequent meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approximately forty (40) hours of personnel time will be devoted to this project.
Attachments:
1. Sunrise Rotary Report
2. Traffic Commission Minutes 1/28193
3. Traffic Commission Letter
-2- r:%agdfpt~4~O4OS~;uebeneh 032894ekg
Bus Bench PPo.]ect YJ4~~ - ~4-~
F'roJect: To build and place approximately 40 bus benches at RTD bus stops on the
three major arteries in Temecula: ¥nez, Jefferson/Front. & Rancho California Rd.
Fhese bus benches wi}l have advertising on them? sold by members of the club to
businesses in the community, as a tax deductible donation to our foundation, with
Drnceeds from the project returned to our community. The benches are rotated on
a reguiar basis so that advertisers are exposed to a variety of locations in the
community.
[his Dro.]ect Hill +it into two of Rotary's avenues of service:
1) Vocational Service? as it will.reouzre the assistance of severa) vocations
represented in our club, such as: a) Attorney-to draw up contracts for advertisers
to sign. ~) Sales- to organize a sales program to sell the advertising, c)
Engineering- to design the benches and arrange for their manufacture, d)
Aavertlszng- to design advertising format for uniform design to comOly with City
Sign Ordance/variance and arrange for painting of the signs, e} Insurance- to
protect advertisers and the Rotary dub against liability claims.
2) Community Service: alto determine the most beneficial locations to place
the benches to serve-the advertiser and the public, b) to run the ongoing committee
to move the benches (rotate) on a auarter!'y/monthlv basis.
Both o+ these Avenues of Service will benefit from the project as St is proposed
that: l) one-half of the profits from this project be used to increase our funding
of scholarships to local high school. continuation high school. and community
college Qraduates and 2) one-half of the profits from the project be used to fund
our communltv Dro~ects, ze: ~otary Park, Communitv ~ecreatlon Center. Senior
Center. youth sOprim Dragrams, etc.
in6 committee should consist o+ members with the +oilowing responsibility:
Uhalrman
~ro.~ect toordinator
Permit F acllitator with City. ~/~'~'
ueslgn ~ Manufacture · ! ~-- (~,'~,'.'
~lgn Criteria, Design & Painting
Legal anO Insurance Icontract w/advertisers) rz., .......... ,- . ....
Sales-
FroJeer fac~litator (moving benches)
issues for Consideration:
Bench Design:
K]'D - fiberglass seat and back on concrete legs-frame
Homer Rotary Club Benches: Plywood seat & back on tube steel +rime-legs
~ommercial - 2"x'o".seats. plywood back in aluminum frame on concrete
tegs-+ra~.
On the ~Tb and Commercial style bench, the back ~s removed and moved to
the next location ¢the advert~z~ng rotates~ wheras on the Hemet kotarv Club
bench, the entire bench is moved. Design considerations are time ~t takesto
remove and ~nsta11 bench backs with added security of -eight o+ bench vs
ease ~n moving entire bench <by thieves as well>.
Location & Number of BenchesT
R'fD has an established bus route in Temecula using several streets, but
our ourposes we need locations that will 'serve the greatest nunbet of
peddle and have benefit to advertisers. Therefore it is recommended that
onlv ~nez? Rancho California Rd. and Jefterson-~ront streets be used.
Limiting benches to these streets will also make moving of the benches
easier on a regular basis.
City AoDrovai Process:
Sign Ordinance
standard sign design: color, name, logo, address, phone.
Permit krocess
City Staff, Planning. Commission, City Counci]
Pricing Considerations:
fast of building bench
Cost of Sign Painting
S~andard fee per Year ~lus initial design & ~aintxng
Value to advertiser
~a~ Deductable donation
Contract:
Fixed Location (e~tra cost vs rotating bench?)
~otatlng Bench
Price
Liability Insurance {club to provide)
~lgn criteria
Use o~ profit limited to scholarships and community Dro~ects
Financial Impact: , '
There will be a considerable cost assocsated with imolementing.this Dro~ect,
Drlmarilv in the purchase of. the benches from a manufacturer or materials
ourchased for the club to manufacture them as a club project. Additionally, the
cost o+ daintyrig the advertisers s~gn onto the bench. ~ecause of the number of
benches and artgoing business for a sign company, we may be able to negotiate a
favorable rate. additionally, all or part of the initial sign painting may be charge~L,l
to the advertiser when they timst advertise. It Is recommended that all
maintalnce of the benches and of the advertising be the resDonsibiizty o~ the
Rotary Club. This Nili encourage advertisers to continue to advertise ~or multidie
years. Fhere may be uDfront costs for design and sign review bv the City.
Once the lnitia| expense of purchasing the benches and going throuah the permit
process with the City and getting the benches painted, the program should
?enerate a signi~icant 'proKit' with which to ~und our scholarships and community
service projects as
40 benches at $300. each per year = $12.000. gross.
There ~s very little maintaince expense to these benchef once they are ~nstalled.
Occasiona|IY they may be vandalized with gra~iti, or abused-broken which will
require constant insQection and repair. ~Jhen the benches are moved, they can be
cleaned by the moving committee, or a company can be contracted to clean them on
a regular bas~s. ~epend~ng on the selection of bench desig~ the benches may be
stolen, which requires replacement so that the advertiser receives value for h~s
donat~on-~nvestment.
Note: Rectangular can-
opies are nvailable for
most park benches. (See
/x~ge ! 5 for details.)
FIBERGLASS PARK BENCHES
Our Park Benches feature fiberglass backs and seats with 1/4 "square
steel cores on 1~4'; 14 gauge galvanized steel flat feet with
ground secorement capabilities. Backs and benches are standard
12" widOxs, however 10" and 15" wide surfaces are also available
on some models. Please inquire with factory. 12' length park
benches have a 3rd center leg for all 6/pes.
$Ts~-t_ LEG -
Our traditional $tet4 Ze~ park benches provide ~.~,~.~.~IP~'
cities and parks with the same solid durability and
maintenance free beauty found in our~bergtnss and .'---m,r.=.,, -
provide generous room for the weary user.
· .~ ,~,, .....
6P8 72 I0 $0 $ W
8PB 96 12 65 S W
12PB 144 12 100 S
·
DOUBLE PEDESTAL
Our traditional Double Pedestal park bench offers a
clean look and a comfortable seat to the tired park
visitor. Its pedestal legs make area clean-up around
the bench a snap. 12' length benches have a 3rd
c, T pedestal leg./.c'gs are either in-ground
n. ,ring type or have leg plates for secorement to
concrete. (Sec p-qgc 26 for details.)
STONE LEG
Popular with city and park buyen due to its anti-
/anthi strength and durability our traditional ~tone
~eg pzrk bench with its 4" cast molded, steel rein-
brced concrete legs provide a unit that needs no
Lnchoring... where you place this brute, is where it
;rays.
Modd tt.ngth Sat W'dtA
Weilht Rnisb
(in.) (in,) (in Ibs,)
6PIC 72 I0 245 S W
7PI5C 84 12 2S0 S
8PBC 96 12 ~ S w
I.,~ 12 380
RECEIVEDI
TEMECULA. CA 92390
January 19, 1993
Larry Markham
41750 Winchester Road, Ste N
Temecula, CA 92590
RE: Rotary Bus Bench Project
Dear Larry:
Pursuant to our conversation, enclosed is a list of proposed bench
locations. This list does not include all of the bus stops in Temecula
provided by RTA, on it~s Route 23, but represents those most suitable
for advertizing. We have asked RTA for permission to relocate it~s
~existing benches on Route 23 to'those locations not provided by our
project.
I have'asked Tom Paradis to contact RTA for a letter expressing their
position in favor of us taking on the responsibility of providing
benches for the convenience of their customers. Tom will forward their
correspondence to me within the next week or so.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Steven D. Ahlquist
First Vice President
Manager
27280 JEFFERSON AVE.. SUITE 100 · TEMECULA. CA 92590-5609 · TELEPHONE (714) 694-8566 · FAX (714) 694-1362
PoI.; Downlown Temec.io, TemKulo Pork'n'Rkie Totgel,
, Toww PIoa, Old Town, Herboge Mob;~e Home Pork
New Yeats Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day,
Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day.
__ Wdlm
Iq~'rmho Ylata
HIgh Iohool
Tl
Mktdk~
Llnfleld 8;hool
CII/Isllln
HIDh tJohool
o/
Page 68
RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY , September 1992
Printed on 100% Recycled Paper
Through Street
Rancho Calif Rd
Ynez
Margarita
Front
Front
Front
Front
Front
Jefferson
Rancho Vista
Rancho Vista
Rancho Vista
Rancho Vista
Margarita
Margarita
Margarita
Margarita
Margarita
Margarita
26040 Ynez
Front Street
Front Street
Front Street
County Center Drive
Ynez
Winchester
Winchester
Diaz
Diaz
Front
2nd Street
Main
Front
Rancho Calif
Rancho Calif
Rancho Calif
Ynez
Ynez
Ynez
Ynez
Ynez
Ynez
Ynez
Rancho Calif
Rancho Calif
TEMECULA SUNRISE ROTARY-
BUS BENCH PROJECT
PROPOSED BENCH LOCATIONS
Cross Street
Town Center
Rancho Highlands
Rancho Vista
Rancho Calif
Del Rio
Del Rio
Via Montezuma
Via Montezuma
Winchester
Sports Park
Sports Park
Mira Loma
Mira Loma
Ave Barca
Ave Barca
Stone Wind
Stone Wind
Solana
Solana
Equity Drive
Enterprise Cir S
Ave Alvarado
Dos Picos
Rancho Calif
Front
Front
Towne Center
Car Wash
Margarita
Rancho Highlands
Solana
Mervyn's
Koll Center
Palm Plaza
Mervyn's Entrance
Toyota
Margarita
Moraga Plaza
Description
S Side/East Bound
E Side at Duck Pond
NE Corner
At Chevron Station
At McDonald's Restaurant
SW Corner
NE Corner
SW Corner
At Burger King
South Side
North Side
North Side
South Side
NW Corner
SW Corner
NE Corner
SW Corner
At Apartments
SW Corner
At Bianchi
At Old Adobe
De1 Taco
At Walt Abraham Center
At Jefferson Med Center
NE Corner
SW Corner
SW Corner
SW Corner
At Post Office
N Side
N Side
Wherehouse
West Side
NE Corner
East Side
SW Corner
S Side
S 'Side
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
Chairman Guerriero declared · recess at 8:00 P.M.
JANUARY 28.1993
The meeting reconvened at 8:10 P.M.
Bus Bench Project
Director Serlet presented the staff report.
Larry Markham~ represe.nting the Sunrise Rotary Club, reported on the bus bench
project being proposed, to build and place approximately 40 bus benches at RTD bus
stops on the three major arteries in Temecule. The club proposes to sell advertising
on the bus benches, which will be installed and maintained by the club members, and
proceeds from advertising-sales will be returned to the community.
Chairman Guerriero suggested that a shelter type bus bench be located at the senior
center.
The overall consensus of the Commission was in support of the Sunrise Rotary Club
bus bench project.
Western Bvoass Corridor Alianment Study
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer, presented the staff report,
Fred Weishaupl, representing NBS Lowry, 27450 Ynez Road, Temecula, the consulting
firm hired to prepare the Western Bypass Corridor Alignment Study, presented an
overview and discussed the alignment studies and diagrams of modified secondary
highway section alternatives.
It was moved by Commissioner Perry, seconded by Commissioner Sander to approve
staff recommendation, recommending to the City Council the following Western
Bypass Corridor Alignment Study recommendations:
1) Approve the Western Bypass Corridor alignment, as illustrated in Exhibit 7 of
the Western Bypass Corridor Alignment Study report, dated December 1992
(Revised), as the Master Plan for this route and maintain its present
classification of a four-lane divided arterial highway on the City of Temecula
General Plan Circulation Element.
2)
Approve the intersection design concept illustrated in Exhibit 3 of the report as
the Master Plan for the Front Street' Intersection.
3)
Approve the design concept of a grade separated interchange for the Rancho
California Road intersection, as illustrated on Exhibit'4 of the report.
PTSCOMMIN1128/13 -3- . '. 2/6/~3
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
JANUARY 28. 1993
4)
Direct Staff to utilize this study document with the above described master-
planned routeAntersections as a resource document for response to
development proposals in the west Temecula area and for future planning of the
City's General Plan Circulation Element,
including:
5) . · Recommend mat. bike paths not be included in the design concept.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 6
COMMISSIONERS: Holliday, Johnson, Knopp, Perry, Sander,
Guerriero
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
OTHER BUSINESS
7. Traffic Enoineer's Report
Director Serlet reported the following:
* Advised of a Local Official's Transportation Forum and asked if any
Commissioner wanted to attend.
Chairman Guerriero stated that he would like to attend,
* Director Serlet asked that the Commission choose a member to serve on the
Temecula/Murrieta Traffic Committee,
It was moved by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Knopp to
nominate Chairman Guerriero to serve on the Temecula/Murrieta' Traffic
Committee. The motion was unanimously carried.
* Director Seriet asked for the Commission to collectively agree on a date to tour
the speed undulations in other cities.
The Commission tentatively agreed on February 23, 1993.
· The contract will be awarded for the widening of Ynez, Anticipate construction
to start in March and continue for approximately nine (9) months,
· Director Serlet provided an overview of the storm damage and clean-up
activities.
~ PTSCOMMIN1128/93 -4.,
City of Temecula
43174 Business Pa~ Driv~ · Temecula. C~lilornia 92590
February 8, 1993
FEB I 0.,
MARKHAM & ASSOCIATES
TEMECULA, CA 92390
69,1d989 · FAX 1909l
i
Mr. Larry Markham
Markham. and Associates
41750 Winchester Road
Temecula, CA 92590
Sunrise Rotary Club
Bus Bench Project
Dear Mr. Markham:
Please advise the Sunrise Rotary Club members that the City of
Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission supports their
involvement in the Community and is pleased to endorse the proposed
bus bench project. Please extend to the club our appreciation for
theinterest the Sunrise Rotary Club has taken in this project.
The City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission is certain
that this project will be both successful for the Rotary Club and
beneficial to the City of Temecula.
Sincerely,
Chairman Ron Guerriero
City of Temecula .
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA -92590
RG:gz
CC:
Director of Public Works Tim Setlet
City Council
ITEM
17'
APPROV3kT,
CItY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Sedet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
April 5, 1994
Status Report on Winchester Interchange, Overland Bridge,
Winchester/Nicolas Signalization, Right Turn Lane at Pals Road/Highway
79 South, and Margarita Road Widening North of Rancho California Road
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council receive and file the Status Report on Winchester Interchange, Overland
Bridge, Winchester/Nicolas Signalization, and Right Turn Lane at Pala Road/Highway 79 South.
BACKGROUND:
The following is a status report on the above mentioned project.
Winchester Interchange - Caltrane has completed their review of the Project Report and
have requested a Level of Service Traffic Analysis for all main lane sections,
intersections, ramps, merge, diverge, and weave sections. This additional effort will
involve obtaining the necessary traffic count data and performing evaluations for
various traffic conditions.
The plans and technical specifications are still in review at Caltrans. Caltrans expects
to complete their review by the end of March, 1994. The Structural Engineer has been
notified to proceed with the widening of the Santa Gertrudis Bridge and is scheduled
to submit the plan to Caltrans by the end of March, 1994. Relocation plans for sewer
and water lines within portions of Palm Plaza that will be affected by the construction
are being prepared and will be submitted to the respective utilities for approval, It is
anticipated that the project will be advertised for construction in December, 1994. The
current construction estimate is $7,755,240.
The plans for the construction of the right rum lane on the south side of Winchester
Road east of Jefferson Avenue are in review at Caltrens. It is anticipated that Caltrans
will complete their review by the end of March, 1994.
II.
Overland Overcrossina - The Project Report has been revised per Caltrans comments
and resubmitted to them. The Structural Engineer has completed the Advanced
Planning Study determining the type of bridge and submitted it to Caltrans, The pier
r:tagdrpt~4~O40~mmuerpt~gn/mkg
and abutment locations are necessary to complete structural plans and their location
will affect the limits of Caltrens right-of-way and the configuration of the ACS perking
lot.
The plans and technical specifications am being revised to reflect the changes
mandated by Caltrans during their initial review of the Project Report. The plans and
specifications are 90% complete and will be resubmitted by the end of March, 1994.
The current construction cost estimate is ~ 12,020,727.
Staff is currently negotiating a contract amendment with J.F. Davidson Associates to
cover unanticipated work items such as addition of Jefferson Avenue Improvements,
EMWD sewer relocation, ACS perking reconfiguration, and various Caltrens changes.
III.
Winchester/Nicolas Sienalization - The Traffic Signal Design was completed and
submitted to Caltrans for their review on March 1, 1994. It is anticipated that Caltrans
will return their first plan check comments within six (6) weeks.
IV.
Rioht Turn Iane {EB to SB) at Pals Rosd/Hiohwav 79 South - Turning movement counts
have been submitted to Caltrans for their review and 'preliminary design has been
started. It is anticipated that the plans and technical specifications will be submitted
to Caltrans by May 1, 1994.
Margarita Road Widenino - Staff is negotiating a Reimbursement Agreement with
Kemper Real Estate Development Company to expedite the construction of full width
improvements on the east side of Margarits Road. The City will provide a funding
mechanism that will allow Kemper to construct the improvements prior to the time
frames established through the Development Approval Process and reimburse the City
for the construction costs. The primary area of concern involves the use of prevailing
wages and the requirements of the Public Contracts Code.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Future funding will be considered in the Capital Improvement Project.
r:~gdq~t~94~40S~etatuemt.egN~kg
ITEM N'O. 18
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNE~tr
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works\City Engineer
April 5, 1994
Owl Rock Products, Wilson Creek Mine
Owl Rock Sand and Gravel Surface Mining Operation in the Aguanga
Area
PREPARED BY: ~ Raymond A. Cssey, Principal Engineer - Land Development
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and File.
BACKGROUND:
The above project is a Surface Mining Application, Surface Mining Permit No. 185, proposed
by New Owl Rock Products. The project site is located north of State Highway 79 end east
of Sage Road in the Aguanga area, within Riverside County's jurisdiction. An access road,
approximately 3000 feet north of the intersection of Sage Road/State Highway 79, provides ~
access from the site to Sage Road.
The site is located about 15 miles east of the City's easterly boundary at State Highway 79.
An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 382 has been prepared to address the impacts and
their respective mitigation measures.
Upon cursory review of the EIR, staff's opinion is that although the impacts have been
addressed, the mitigation measures and monitoring mechanisms have not been adequately
analyzed. For example, the generated traffic will be destined for the Interstate 15 via State
Highway 79, through the City of Temacula. The existing Average Daily Traffic (ADT) is
18,000 on State Highway 79 between Pals Road and Interstate 15, according to Caltrans
1992 Traffic Volumes on California State Highways. The proposed project will generate an
estimated 290 truck trips per day and 40 employee vehicle trips. Although the EIR indicates
that there is "no change in the Level of Service (LOS)' and the increase in the number of
overall trips seems small, it appears there may be a significant increase in truck traffic on State
Highway 79. Staff has requested a copy of the project traffic study in order to evaluate this
statement.
In addition the .EIR dealt inadequately with the impacts on the Interstate 15/State Highway 79
intersection. Currently, at the intersection of Interstate 15/State/Highway 79, the truck turning
radii at the ramps are substandard, especially the westbound to southbound on-ramp. The EIR
-1- r:.%agdrpt%94%O405%owlrook 032894ekg
states that intersection improvements must be implemented to improve turning radii for trucks
and vehicular passing movements (page 1-23, section 1.4.9) but no mitigation measures are
indicated for this location.
The EIR however, does recommend certain improvements to State Highway 79 and Sage Rood
at the immediate vicinity of the project site, The report recommends reconstruction of the
roads and intersections in the immediate vicinity of the site within 2 years of the Board of
Supervisors' approval,
Noise impacts have also been analyzed by the' EIR. The EIR states that the hours of operation
of the plant are from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Friday. However, the early morning
traffic when employees arrive and trucks haul their first loads is a concern. The report
indicates that the pre-7 a.m. truck traffic shall be analyzed to verify that it does not exceed
20% of the total project site ADT in order not to significantly impact the nearby sensitive
receivers. This is computed to be no more than 46 trucks in or out combined on public roads
before 7 a.m. (the study only evaluates the immediate vicinity of the plant site). The EIR
however, does not specify any monitoring mechanisms nor any implementing measures.
The above application is scheduled to be presented before the Riverside County Planning
Commission on April 13, 1994 at 2:00 p.m.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
-2- r:~agclrpt~4~)40b~owlrook 032894ekg
ITEM NO. 19
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
NANCE OFFI~a~
TY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Sedet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
April 5, 1994
Speed Undulation Re-design - Calle Pirm Colada
PREPARED BY:
Marry Lauber, Traffic Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council increase the maximum height of speed undulations on Calle Pifta Colada
from two inches (2") to three inches (3').
BACKGROUND:
Based on public input and discussion at the March 22, 1994 City Council Meeting, the Traffic
Division of the Public Works Department has re-analyzed the Standard Design for Speed
Undulations.
The height of existing speed undulations on Calle Pirm Colada is two inches (2"). This design
was derived from guidelines supplied by many communities through-out Southern California
and from input received from the Temecula Valley Unified School .District.
Although the speeds on Calle Pilm Colada have decreased, sporadic incidence of motorist
flagrantly violating the existing speed limit are a continued concern of residences. The
increase in height of the~xisting speed undulations should further help alleviate this problem.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds are available in the Fiscal Year 93-94 Public Works Street Maintenance Account No.
100-164-999-5402.
Undulations - Additional Asphalt Paving 8 at
Pavement Markings - Cross Hatching 8 at
Traffic Control
~525.00 = $4,200.00'
$100.00 = 800.00
~850.00 = 850.00
TOTAL is 5,850.00
Attachment:
Exhibit "A" - Speed Undulation Design Revision
r.~mdq~S4~dreedee.eUa/p
12" REFLECTIVE WHITE 12'
STRIPES L~ 6' O:C. ~ ~
1' TAPER ("FYP) 1 /! ' 150'
I , e. I
W37AR'
W6(15} I -
INSTALL SIGN AND POST
,., , ,
~' ',~BL' . B
; , i
~so' I 12oo'-2so'SPACIN,Gl ISO'I
4 I~
TYP
CONSTRUCT 12'
ASPHALT UNDULATION
~.. W3?AR
W6{15}
CURB FACE
2' MAX TAPER
(WIDTH 12"
VARIES)
-~'.-:.:.' 7: '~ ':'
SECTION 'B-B'
A.C. STANDARD 3/8' MIX
TACK COAT
SECTION 'A-A'
REFLECTIVE WHITE
PAVEMENT MARK1NG'-~-
DETAIL
INSTALLATION DETAILS:
1, SPE[D UNOU/J,,TIONS SHALL NOT BE PLAC~D OVER
MANHOLES, WATERGATES, JUNCTION CHAMBERS, ETC,
2. EDGE OF SPEED UNDULATIQNS SHALL BE S FE='T
MINIMUM FROM EDGE OF DRIVEWAY,
3. WHENEVER PQSSIF~L~_ SPEED UNDULATIONS SHALL
BE PLACED AT PROPERTY LINES INSTEAD OF MID-LOT.
4. WHENEVER PO-~SIELE SPE,cD UNDULATIONS SHALL
BE PLACID ADJACENT TO '=:TRE,r't' UGHTS,
5. LOCATION OF SPc_=D UNDULATIONS TO BE DETERMINED
BY CITY ENGINE;R,
WARNING FLAGS
(FIRST WEEF,1
/ 30" X 30" W37R
WARNING SIGN.
BLACK ON YELLOW
6' SERIES 'E' LETTERS
W6(15} SIGN
W6(15) SIGN
SIGN LOCATIONS: AS
DIRECTED BY CITY ENGINE-'R
REVISIONS
OA': E INI:.
!',ARP, CH. ZS, 19o, H ~.,'ICL
APPROVED
DAlE
CITY OF TEMECULA
STANDARD 3"'~"
SPEED UNDULATION
S |ANDARD NO.
ITEM NO.
2O
aYL/tWB OY ~ )'.AYOR8 ~
COUNOZLMF,)~w-RB CONFF, RENC~B
OY it%V~RI%DB COUNTY
MtTZCLB l:
~XZMQZ~AL OYYZCB
Section 1.01 T~catton. The principal office of the
conference for the transaction of conference business shall be
located at the City Hall of the City Council of which the current
;haiz~a^ chatr/sex~axis a member.
MtTZCLB ZI
M~XB]RO
Section 2.01 Clas- of Members. The conference shall have one
class of members only. All members shall have equal voting rights,
unless specified differently elsewhere in the Bylaws. (See Sac.
3.07)
Section 2.02 O-a]4f4cattonl ~or Mmm~l~shtR. All elected
mayors and councilmembers of the cities of ltiverside County shall
be eligible for membership in t.he Conference.
Section 2.03 Aamtemton. ~ualified individuals shall be
automatically admitted to full membership in the Conference upon
their ~4ali£1_~le~ certification for the office, either
councilmember or mayor, =o which they were elected.
Section 2.04 Termtnxt{on of Mem~eh~. Membership in the
Conference shall cease as soon as a member~s successor in the
office has been duly elected and ~ualifi.~ certified and admitted
to membership in this Conference.
MeTIt'Ll Ill
Section 3.01 Rambler Meet{nee. Regular meetings of the
members shall beheld on the second We~ week of~month
or as host city selects.
Section 3.02 pmxce of Me-t~n-I. The City in which regular
meetings are held shall rotate among the member cities on a
schedule which shall be determined prior to the beginning of each
calendar year. The place of the meeting shall be selected by the
host city.
Section 3.03 Notice o[ Reg,,l~r Meetings. At least two weeks
prior to the day of the regular meeting, the host city shall notify
the Ohcir~a~. chair~[~ of the location selected for the meeting.
At least ten'd~ prior to the meeting, the Chair~a~ shall send
notice of the place of the meeting to the members.
Section 3.04 S~ec4A~ Meet4nas. special meetings of the.
membership may be called by a majority vote of the Directors.
Notice of any such meeting must be given at least 48 hours in
advance of said meeting and shall specify the purpose and the
nature of business to be conducted at said meeting.
Section 3.05 Ngt4ces. Notices of the time and place of
regular meetings shall b · given in writing. Notice of the time and
place of special meetings may be given in writing, or required to
be given by these bylaws, and shall be directed to the City Hall or
City Administration Office of each memberes city. Only one notice
per city need be given.
Section 3.06 Onor-m. The presence or absence of quorum shall
be determined with reference to the number of cities represented by
the members of the Conference. A quorum shall be present if
members representing'a majority of such cities are present at any
meeting ·
Section 3.07 Vot4ng. =.~k _~b~ The ma~ors or their
designass shall be entitled to one vote on any matter presented to
the members which requires a vote.* Voting for members of the Board-,
of Directors and for appointments to any other committee,
conference, or association to which the Conference may appoint its
re resentative, shall be by secret ballot. All other matters requiring a
v~e may be by vo'ce vote 1 otherwise directed by the Board. (*1 vote per Cit'
un eSS
1
Section 3,08 Cona,,ct of Hastines. All meetings shall be
conducted in accordance with accepted parliamentary procedures.
The Ch---i,...a.. chatrJl~[f~k of the Board of Directors shall .conduct
the meetings.
ARTXCLB IV
BOaaD OF DZRBCTOR2
Section 4.01 O,~q{f4c~t4on ~na N-m~er. Any member of the
Conference who has at least one year left of elected office shall
be eligible as a member of the Board of Directors. The Board of
Directors shall consist of five members.
Section 4.02 Selection of CxnaiAates. In October of each
years nominating committee shall be appointed by the current Board
of Directors. The nominating committee shall consist of three
members. The nominating committee shall prepare a list of
candida es for Directorships. Nominations shall also be accepted
from the floor at the time of the election.
Sac=ion 4.03 Time of [lection. Electionshall be held at the
regular meeting in November of each year, with the chairpsrs~R
alternaCing be=wean eastern and western cities. 1~ae fou~ ~na~didates
receiving the highest number of votes, plus ~he immediate past
chairman, shall be the Board of Directors. Elected Directors shall
assume their positions at ~heregular meeting in December-
Section 4.04 Term of Office. A Director shall hold office
for a term of one year. A Director can be elected to a consecutive
term, but no Director shall serve more than two terms in
succession.
Section 4.05 n, ties. It shall be the duty of the Directors|
(a) To choose from among the Board, the officers of the
Conference~
(a)
(b)
(c)
(b) To choose nominees for election to the various
committees, conferences and association on which this Conference is
entitled to representations
(c) To perform any and all other duties which may from time
to time be necessary to promote the purpose of ~his Conference.
Section 4.06 Removal. A Director can be removed from office
by a majorityvo~e of the members only for cause. "Cause" shall be
defined as follows:
Willful failure to fulfill the duties Of a Director~
Commission of any crime involving moral turpitude~
Termination of membership status.
Section 4 07 VacancJes. Any vacancies occasioned by .the
removal, death' or resignation of a Di=ector shall be filled by
appointment by the remaining Directors. If the remaining Directors
cannot agree on an appoint=ant, they shall present two candidates
to the membership a~ the next regular meeting held following the
creation of the vacancy. The replacement Director shall then be
chosen by majority vote of the members. Said Director shall serve
for the remainder of the term to which the removed, deceased or
resigning Director was elected.
Section 4.08 ]llet{n-s. Directors shall meet the clay of and
prior to the regular meetings of members, l/xlol~ and conduct
such business as may come before them. Special meetings of the
Board may b e called in the same manner as provided in Section 3.041
Notice of a special meeting shall be given as provided.in Section
3.95.
Section 5.0~ N-m~er ~n~ T~tlem. The officers of the
Conference shall be five in number and .shall consist of the
following|
(a)
(b)
C~atraaa, Chatz .nr ,-w~a
Vice c.".aiz~c, Chalr~eraoa
(c) Secretary
(d) Treasurer
(e) Immediate Past Chai~_e~. Chatr~~
Section 5.02 Selection.' Officers shall be elected from among
the members of the Board of Directors by the members of the Board
of Directors.
Section 5.03 Duties of O~ficers. The duties of the officers
shall be as follows:
(a) Chaiz~.a..Chatrpexs~ The Ohai~_zAcha/rRgf~nsha11 (1)
preside at all meetings of the Board of Direc~'i and the regular
monthly meetings~ (2) notify the members of the location and time--
of each meeting; (3) perform such other duties as' may from time t~
time be determined by the Board of Directors.
(b) Vtce-Chgiaa..Chairpe~e~: The Vice ehai~i.g,,Chatr~e[f~k~
shall preside in the a"F~nce of the ~hai~m&A chair~~and
perform such other duties as may be assigned b'f'~he
chatrBR~fM.
(c) Secretary: The Secretary shall keep accurate minutes of
all meetings of the Board and the members, certify the results of
all elections, and perform such other duties'as may be assigned by
the ChalP,..a.. chatr~e~
(d) Treasurer-' The Treasurer shall be responsible for such
*~unds as maM from time to ~ime be collected by the Conference and
~x such other duties as may be assigned by the
chatrpe~x
~d'the accountjng thereof
ARTICLE VI
Section 6.01 Amsessments. Wi~hthe approval of the members,
the Conference may assess i~= .~cA~cro, ez the Cities' represented by
the members, such amounts as may be required to pay the expenses of
the Conference.
ARTXCL! VXX
BYLAWS
Section 7.01 ~fmct4ve D,te. These Bylaws shall become
effective upon their adoption by a majority of the members at any
regular meeting and when certified by ~he Ohaim&~
Section 7.02 Amenament. These Bylaws may be amended, in
whole or in part, upon recommendation of the Board of Directors,
and by a vote of the majority of the members.
I, Patricia L. Herron, Chairman of the Mayors and
Councilmembers Conference of Riverside County, certify ~hat the
foregoing Bylaws were adopted at the regular meeting held on May 8
1985, in Palm Desert. '
/s/
Parrlois L. Herron,
Date: May 8, 1992
I, James O. Hyatt, certify that Z am the duly elected
Secretary of the Mayors and Councilmembers Conference of Riverside
county and that the foregoing Bylaws consisting of five pages is a
true and correct col~ of the Bylaws adopted by the conference at a
Regular Meeting held on May S, 1985 with the City of Palm Deser~
and executed by Pa~ricia L. Herron as Chairman.
James O, Hyatt, Secretary
1994-02-02 !2:~2 pAg= =
ITEM NO.
21
APP
CIiT~ ATTOR ~.
/
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
P 811
Gary Thornhill, Director of I ning~''
April 5, 1994
Status of Proposed Downsizing Ordinance
PREPARED BY: John Meyer
RECOMMENDATION: It is requested that the City Council and Planning Commission:
Receive and File this status report on the preparation of the proposed
downsizing ordinance.
BACKGROUND
On February 22, 1994, staff received direction from the Council to prepare an ordinance to
regulate the size of residential units in approved tracts. On March 7, 1994, staff presented
a report to the Planning Commission to get its concerns and recommendations on the subject
topic. Example ordinances from the Cities of Murriets and Moreno Valley were also given to
the Commission.
COMMISSION DIRECTION'
Upon receiving input fr6m staff and the general public, the Commission members provided
staff the following comments:
e
Include criteria that considers the ratio of vacant lots to built lots.
Consider reducing the average square footage of the homes in a tract, but not
the minimum square footage.
Be specific as possible when developing criteria for homes-within a "transition
area" between larger and smaller homes.
Consider a 10 to 15 percent limit on the reduction of homes sizes.
Require landscaping of the reduced home be identical to the built homes.
Get a clear legal opinion on the City's legal ability to regulate home sizes.
It was the overall consensus of the Commission that the Murriets Ordinance was favored over
the Moreno Valley Ordinance.
CITY ATTORNEY
In addition to the direction from the Planning Commission, staff has asked the City Attorney
to also provide direction regarding downsizing ordinances and in particular on recent litigation
involving the Moreno Valley Ordinance.
PROCESS
With the input received from the Commission, staff has begun to prepare a draft ordinance.
· Prior to bringing the draft ordinance back to the Commission, staff will present it to the
Temecula Coordinating Committee and the local Building Industry Association chapter.
FISCAL IMPACT
Because this ordinance is being prepared in-house, no expenditures of City funds is necessary.
However, it is estimated this ordinance will require 28 staff hours to prepare at a cost of about
$1000, not including the City Attorney's time.
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITE.M
1
APPRO~~,
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM:
Ronald Bradley, City Manager
DATE: April 5, 1994
SUBJECT:
Final Fee Credits for Paloma Del Sol Park
PREPARED BY: ~,~Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Approve a final fee credit of ~$1,025,349 for Kemper Community Development Company for
the construction and dedication of Paloma Del Sol Park.
BACKGROUND: On December 8, 1992, the City Council approved an Amendment
and Restatement of the Development Agreement between the City of Temecula and Bedford
Development Company concerning the Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan. Pursuant to the
amended agreement, Kemper Community Development Company, as successors in interest
to Bedford Development Company, will receive a maximum credit of $2,000,000 towards City
Public Facilities Fees, payable for building permits, in exchange for developing Paloma Del Sol
Park and a future 7.44 acre park site. Based upon the preliminary construction cost estimate
for Paloma Del Sol Park, the Community Services Commission and the Board of Directors
approved a preliminary fee credit of $1,368,000 towards Public Facilities Fees.
Upon formal acceptance of Paloma Del Sol Park by the City on January 25, 1994, Kemper
Community Development Company submitted a "Fee Credit Analysis" to staff for review
which indicated that the 'final park construction costs were $1,050,735. On February 8,
1994, the City Council approved an initial fee credit of $500,000 as a portion of the final fee
credit to be approved, pending. staff review and verification of all construction costs
associated with the development of the park.
Staff has 'determined that all the invoices, contracts and retention payments associated with
the construction costs of Paloma Del Sol Park, and allowed for fee credits pursuant to the
amended Development Agreement, have been paid. The construction costs are summarized
within the "Paloma Del Sol Park Credit Analysis", which is attached for your review.
On March 14, 1994, the Community Services Commission approved an additional credit of
$525,349 against Public Facilities Fees for Kemper Community Development Company.
Coupled with the initial fee credit of $500,000 approved by City Council on February 8, 1994,
the developer will receive a total credit of $1,025,349 towards Public Facilities Fees for the
development of Paloma Del Sol Park.
r:/yasinoblrJpds,cc 040594.
FISCAL IMPACT: Upon final approval by the City Council, Kemper Community
Development shall receive a total fee credit of ~1,025,349 against Public Facilities Fees,
payable at building permits, for the development of Paloma Del .Sol Park·
Pursuant to Section 12.10 of the amended Development Agreement, Public Facilities Fees,
in the amount of ~3,000 for each building permit pulled, shall be paid through the final fee
credit amount. This credit shall be retro-active to any building permits pulled after Council
action on February 8, 1994.
ATTACHMENTS:
City Council Agenda, 2/8/94.
Community Services Commission Agenda, 3/14/94.
'Paloma Del Sol Park Credit Analysis"
r.\yaeinobk~nb~.e~m 040394
APPROVA
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
- t .~AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM:
David F. Dixon, City Manager
DATE:
February 8, 1994
SUBJECT:
' ' Fee Credits for Paloma Del Sol Park.
PREPARED BY: (~rl~(2~lSeryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Approve an initial fee credit of ~500,000 for Kemper Community Development Company for
the construction and dedication of Paloma Del Sol Park.
BACKGROUND: On ~January 11, 1994, the Board of Directors approved the
acceptance of the grant deed from Kemper Community Development Company for Paloma Dei
Sol Park, a 9.50 acre sports complex located within the Paloma Del Sol Development, subject
to the vacation proceedings for Campanula Way. On January 25, 1994 City Council approved
the vacation of the roadway and the City officially assumed ownership of the park. The
amenities of the park include two (2) baseball fields with soccer overlays, ball field lighting,
bleachers, a 1200 square foot rest room\ snack bar facility, picnic tables, benches, signage,
drinking fountains, refuse receptacles, walkways and on-site parking.
Pursuant to the Amendment and Restatement of the Development Agreement for the Paloma
Del Sol Specific Plan, dated December 8, 1992, in exchange for developing Paloma Del Sol
Park and a future 7.44 acre park site, Kempe~ Community Development Company, is to
receive a maximum credit of ~2,000,000 against City Public Facilities Fees payable for
building permits. Based upon the preliminary construction cost estimate for this park, the
Board of Directors approved a preliminary fee credit of ~1,368,000 towards City Public
Facilities Fees.
Kemper Community Development Company has submitted an itemized "fee credit analysis
report" to the City for review that indicates the final construction cost for Paloma Del Sol Park
is $1,050,735. 'Although staff is in the process of verifying the information provided within
the report, this amount is considerably lower than the construction cost estimate that was
originally projected by the Developer and approved by the City Council for fee credits.
Until 'such time as staff has reviewed and verified the final construction costs identified in the
report, the Developer is requesting that the City approve an initial fee credit of ~500,000 so
they may move forward with obtaining building permits within their project. Initial review of
the report indicates that this amount is reasonable and is in compliance with the intent of the
Development Agreement.
FISCAL IMPACT: The initial fee credit of 8500,000 will be applied towards
final fee credit approved for this park facility. Following the review and verification of all
construction costs associated with the development of this park, staff anticipates forwarding
a staff report to the Community Services Commission on March 14, 1994 and City Council
on March 22, 1994, which will identify the proposed final fee credit to be received by Kernper
against City Public Facilities Fees.
_:-
yaein~bk%pds.feee 020894
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION
SHA~/!~"~): NELSON
MARCH 14, 1994
FINAL FEE CREDITS FOR PALOMA DEL SOL PARK
PREPARED BY: G;)I~
RECOMMENDATION:
Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant
That the Community Services Commission:
Approve a final fee credit of $1,025,349 for Kernper Community Development
Company for the construction and. dedication of Paloma Del Sol Park...
BACKGROUND: On January 25, 1994, the City of Temecula officially
accepted the dedication of Paloma Del Sol Park, a 9.50 sports complex, from Kemper
Community Development Company. The park is located in the Paloma Del Sol
Development, at the southeast corner De Portola Road and Campanula Way. The
amenities of the park include two (2) baseball fields with soccer overlays, ball field
lighting, bleachers, a 1200 square foot rest room/snack bar facility, picnic tables,
benches, signage, drinking fountains, refuse receptacles, walkways and on-site
parking.
Pursuant to City Council approval. on December 8, 1992 of the Amendment and
Restatement of the Development Agreement for the Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan,.
Kemper Community Development Company will receive a maximum credit of
$2,000,000 against City Public Facilities Fees, payable for building permits, in
exchange for developing' Paloma Del Sol Park and a future 7.44 acre park site.
Subsequently, the Community Services Commission and the Board of Directors
approved a preliminary fee credit of $1,368,000 towards Public Facilities Fees based
upon the preliminary construction cost estimate for Paloma Del Sol Park.
Upon dedication of the park to the City, the Developer submitted a "fee credit
analysis" to staff for review that indicated a final construction cost for Paloma Del Sol
Park of $1,050,735. Since this amount was considerably lower than originally
approved by the Board of Directors for fee credits, the Developer requested that the
City consider approving an initial fee credit of $500,000 so the~/could move forward
with obtaining building permit.~ '~hin their project. On February 8, 1994, the City
Council approved the initial fee credit of $500,000 as a portion of the final fee credit
to-be approved, pending staff review and verification of all construction cosus
associated with the development of the park.
The review and verification of construction costs for Paloma Del Sol Park has been
completed. The contracts, invoices, payment vouchers, and retention payments have
been .submitted by the developer and reconciled to the "Paloma Del Sol Credit
Analysis", a copy of which is attached for your review.
Staff is recommending that Kernper Community Development Company receive an
additional $525,349 credit against Public Facilities Fees. Coupled with the initial fee
credit of $500,000 approve by City Council on February 8, 1994, Kernper Community
Development Company shall receive a total credit of $1.,025,349 towards Public
Facilities Fees for the development of Paloma Del Sol. Park.
FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval by the Community Services Commission and the
CiW Council, Kernper CommuniW Development shall receive a total fee credit of
$1,025,349 against Public Facilities Fees payable for building permits, for the
development of Paloma Del Sol Park. A staff report is scheduled to be forwarded to
CiW Council on April 12, 1994 for final approval of the fee credits.
Pursuant to Section 12.10 for the amended Development Agreement, Public Facilities
Fees, in the amount of $3,000 for each building permit pulled, shall be paid through
the final fee credit amount. This credit shall be retro-active to any building permits
pulled a~er Council action on February 8, 1994. Staff anticipates that the first 333
building permits obtained after this date will be entitled to receive the credit.
Paloma Del Sol Park Credit Analysis
roject Name: PDS SW Infrastructure (General Ledger Detail)
top/"' Number: 5200/Kernper Community Development Company
pate; ,/24/94 Rev.: 03/09/94
; ene ral'. Led g e r Sum m a ry:: :-Th rou gk 1/2 129..
.ccount No. Line Item
1200 ICivil - Engineering - '.
1216 i Survey/Topo/Boundary
1260 iEnvironmental Assessment - Bio
.1320 iPaleological
1340 ISoils Report
1420 iUtilitv Design
1425 IArchitect - Building Contract
1440 iLandscape Architect
1480 iPlans - Printing
1.520 iPermit & City Inspection
1562 lWater - Utility Ext. & Hookup
1566 IElectric - Utility Ext. & Hookup
1572 ~Sanit. Sewer- Utility. Ext. & Hookup
1574 {Inspection - RCWD & EMWD
1582 lK-Rat Fee
1620 I Joint Trenching
1660 l Site Grading & Earthwork
~-~670 lErosion Control
330 tSite Drainage
'1700 ILandscaping & Harriscape Park
1760 IStreet & Paving
1761 ICurb & Gutter
1660 ]N.O.C.
6182 !Security
6188 IWeed Abatement/Discing
7700 IExtended Maintenance - Dec. 93
7710 iWater - RCWD Billing
Dub-Total Costs ~paid:::T. hrOugh:.l/21294:::.:!::..:~::~!:i~:.!:;?:;!:;~::
Park Costs
$14,665.00]
$17,084.50J
$0.00i
$O.OOJ
$12,740.00l
$360.00~
$1,2oo.oo (
$13,357.081
$1,360.00
$32,886.25[
$3,600.00~
$0.00l
$11.260.00 [
$o.ool
$O.OOj
$o.ool
$141,o73.681
$0.00l
$2,450.00l
$743,544.49
$0.00
$6,870.00
$0.001
$0.001
$0.00
$4,533.20
$3,651.44
Offsite Costs
$15,628.91i $30,293.91
$8,252.50 $25,337.00
$893.501 $893.50
$7,429.001 $7,429.00
$9,771.87 $22,511.87
$0.00 $360.00
$0.00 $1,200.00
$0.00 $13,357.08
$907.86~ $2,267.86
$9,772.501 $42,658.75
$42,830.00 $46,430.00
$4,003.52 $4,003.52
$58,627.00 $69,887.00
$6,885.00 $6,885.00
$17,062.50 $17,062.50
$56,643.20 $56,643.20
$0.00 $141,073.68
$5,613.96[ $5,613.96
$11,213.00 ~ $13,663.00
$0.94! $743,545.43
$31,005.54 1 $31,005.54
$21,011.90 [ $27,881.90
$5.001 $5.00
$168.381 $168.38
$250.001 $250.00
$0.001 $4,533.20
$0.00 ~ $3,651.44
: :Sl;010,635:64 i'.-==~:!':.$307;976:08 '::,' $1~318i6H.72':'
~dditional Park Costs Paid Through 319/94
~ccount No.' Line Item
1700 IPaxk Sign w/Logo - Balance/Country Signs
1760
7700
7700
7710
7710
IDePonola Barricade/Lewis Valley
IExtended Maintenance - Oakridge Landscape
ISCE Opening. Bill
IRCWD #1-25-10215
IRCWD #1-25-10216
Subtotal: ..
Park Costs
$2,577.72
$2,470.00
$4,533.20
$4,669.88
$233.15
$229.68
814,713.63
ITEM
NO.
2
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
(ity Manager/City Council
hewn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services
April 5, 1994
SUBJECT: Sam Hicks Monument Perk Master Plan
PREPARED BY: ~Phyllis L. Ruse, Senior Management Analyst'~~''
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Approve the Master Plan for Sam Hicks Monument Park.
2. Adopt the Negative Declaration for the project.
Authorize the preparation of construction documents end release · formal public bid
for the project.
BACKGROUND: On November 9, 1993, the City Council awarded · design contract for
the preparation of · Master Plan for improvements at Sam Hicks Monument Park. On that
same date, the Council directed staff to prepare an amended land lease between the City and
the Old Town Temecula Historical Museum Foundation, providing for · footprint for the
Foundation to construct · permanent museum facility and renovate St. Catherine's Church
on the park site. The Council further directed that the necessary documents be prepared to
provide for Redevelopment Agency funding for the project. Finally, it was recommended that
the Foundation and the City master plan the entire site as a joint effort.
A project committee was established with representatives from the City Council, Community
Services Commission, the Museum Foundation, the Old Town Architectural Review
Committee, the Old Town Redevelopment Committee, City and Museum deign consultants,
senior citizens, and City staff. The project committee's first task was to identify the various
potential user groups for the park and possible park activities determined by these groups.
The Museum's needs were also considered. The committee then explored the opportunities
and constraints presented by the site.
The Museum Foundation and the City's consultant, The Alhambra Group, worked together to
exhibit various conceptual designs that best matched the committee's goals. Each participant
contributed valuable comments and suggestions and worked together in an atmosphere of
partnership. At the conclusion of the third committee meeting, all members unanimously
supported the proposed Master Plan.
On March 7, 1994, the Master Plan was presented to the Planning Commission for comment.
On March 14, 1994, the Community Services Commission conducted a noticed public hearing
to receive community comment and testimony and to consider staff's recommendation, At
the conclusion of the public hearing, the Commission approved the Master Plan with a
modification to the parking lot near the restroom/snack bar facility and with the stipulation
that the bid documents include an add alternate for the retrofit of the parking lot lights at the
Senior Center to be consistent with the ones lights utilized at Sam Hicks Monument Park.
.The Master Plan designates an ultimate footprint of 22,900 square feet for the Museum. The
Foundation proposes building the facility in phases. Phase one will consist of a 6,100 square
foot museum, a 1,800 square foot plaza area, a 1,000 square foot outdoor interpretive center,
and the renovation of the existing church. The City's portion of the plan will include
upgrading the tot lot to ADA standards, construction of a gazebo/bandstand facility,
installation of · formal rose garden, courtyard, circulation paths, picnic facilities,
improvements to the monument, a restroomlsnackbar, security lighting, landscaping and
irrigation. Improvements made in the footprint for future development by the Museum
Foundation have been designed to be aesthetically pleasing and functional as well as easily
removable and cost effective when the time comes to replace them. It is anticipated that the
revised lease and documents for Redevelopment Agency funding will be brought to the City
Council and the Redevelopment Agency at their April 26, 1994 meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT: This project was budgeted in the City's Capital Improvement
Program for FY 1993/94. Design costs have been transferred from the Development Impact
Fees, to be reimbursed with Redevelopment Funds.
City of Temecula
P!pnnin Department
Initial Environmental Study
I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1. Name of Project:
2. Case Numlgrs:
3. Location of Project:
4. Description of Project:
5. Date of Environmental
Assessanent:
6. Name of Proponent:
7. Address and Phone
Number of Proponent:
Sam Hicks Monmneat Park Master Planffemecula Museum
N/A
Northeast corner of Moreno Road and Metcedes Street
A long range lVlaster Development Plan for Sam Hicks Monument
Park. The project includes a Museum that will be constructed in
three (S)ph=es.
Febnm-y IS, 1994
City of Tenv~!srrem~la Museum Association
43174 Bu~iv~s Park Drive
Temsc,,ia, CA 92~90
(909) .694-6400
ENVIRONlVIENTAL IIVIPACTS
(Explanations to all the answers are provided in Section IH)
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, d~placements, compaction, or over covering
of the soft?
c. Change in topography or ground surface relid features?
d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique .
geologic or physical features?
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on
or off the site?
f. Changes in sfitafion, deposition or erosion?
g. The modification of any wash, channel, creek, river or lake?
Yes M_a No
X
X
X
m
R:WI'~IC:K~.E 2J17/14 klb 1
Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as
earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, liqudac~ion, grou_n~
falhlre, or simi!~ff hazards?
i. Any development within an Alquist-Priolo Special Stadim Zone?
Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Air emi.gsiom or det~riorstion of ambient sir quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
Alteration of air movement, temperature, or moisture or any
change in clinate, whether locally or regionally?.
Water. Will the proposal result in:
(~anges in currents, or the course or direction of waun'
movements, in either marine or fresh wmrs?
be
Changes in absorption rates, drainage p___s~rm, or the x'a~e and
amount of surface runoff?.
c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body?
Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not limited to, temperatrite,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?
Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct
additions, withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer
by cuts or excavatiom?
Reduction in the amoum of water otherwise available for public
water supplies?
Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such
as flooding?
Plant Life. WHi the proposal result in:
Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native
species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and
aquatic plants)?
X
X
X
No
X
X
X
R:~"TAFFRPT~..kMHIC:ICS.IS 2/14/k~4 kJb 2
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or
endangered species of plants.'?
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native
ve~el~ion, or in a barrier ~ the normal repleni~hnq~ of
existing species?
d. Redu~on in the aerie of any agricultural crop?
5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the divenity of species, or numben of any species of
animals (animals includes all land animals, birch, reptiles, fish,
amphibians, shellfish, benthic organisms, and/or insects)?
b. Reduction of the numben of any unique, rare, au~tt--~d, or
endangered species of animals?
c. The introduction of new wildlife species into an area?
d. A barrier to the migration or movement of animals?
e. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?.
6. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
c. Exposure of people to severe vibrations?
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce or result in light or glare7
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in:
a. Alteration of the present land use of an area?
b. Alteration to the future planned land use of an area as described
in a community or general plan?
9. Natural ~. WH! the proposal result in:
a. An increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?
b. The depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource?
X
X
X
X
R:~TAFFRPTIdeI~ICKS.IS 2/14/04 k/b 3
l 0. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal resul~ in:
ll.
12.
ae
A risk of an explosion or the release of any hazardous substances
in the event of an accident or upset conditions (hazardous
substances includes, but is not limimd to, pesticicles, chemicals,
oil or radiation)?
be
The use, storage, trampon or disposal of any hazardous or toxic
materials (including, but not limit~ to oil, pesticicles, chemicals,
or radiation)?
Ce
Possible in2rfereace with sn emergency response plan or an
emergency evacuSion plsn?
Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density,
or growth ra~ of the human population of an area?
Housing. Will the proposal affect existing homing or create a demand
for additional housing?.
13. Transportslion/Cir~_dnfion. WHI the proposal result in:
14.
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parirlng?
Ce
Substantial impact upon existin~ mmspomuion sys~ms, inchdin~
public transpor2~ion?
Aierstions to present patterns of circulation or movement of
people and/or goods?
e. AlersZions to wSerborne, rail or air traffic?
Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
Public Serviees. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of
the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police proteaion?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
m
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:%STA~ICKS. IS 2/14t84 klb 4
e. Msimensm~ of public facilities, including rosds?
f. Other governmemsl services:
15. EnesXy..Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial smounts of fuel or ~
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources or energy,
or require the developn2nt of n~w sources of energy?
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need fur new systems, or
subsUmtial alterations to any of the following utilities:
a. Power or nsmral gas?
b. . Communications Sy~te!~?
c. Water systems?
d. Sanitary sewer systnm or septic tanks?
e. Storm water dralna~ systems?
f. Solid waste disposal systems?
g. Will the proposal result in a disjointed or inefficient pattnn of
utility delivery system improvemems for any of the above?
17. Human Hesith. Will the proposal result in:
a. The creation of any health hszarcl or potential health hazard?
b. The exposure of people to potential health hazards, including
the exposure of sensitive receptors (such as hospitals and
schools) to toxic pollutant emissions?
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in:
Maybe
X
X
X
X
X
19.
a. The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? _
b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site opera to public view?_
c. Detrimental visual impsets on the surrounding area? __
Recreafiou. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or
qusntity of existing reaeSional r-~,ources or opporUmides?
X
R:%STAFFIFT"~IdVe4K::KS.IS 2/14/94 klb 5
The alteration or destruction of any paleomologic, prehistoric,
archaeoloZical or historic site?
b. Adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic
building, struaure, or object?.
c. Any poUmtial to csuse a physicsl chanZe which would affect
U~iqU~ e~ni~ ~lra~ v~!ues?
d. RestriCtions t~ e0fisting religious or sacred uses within the
potendal imp. act area?
X
X
X
R:%b'TAFF~ICK$.IS 2/14/14 Idb 6
ttl. DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRO~AL IMPACTS
1.a.
No. The proposal will not result in unstable earth conditiom or changes in geologic substructures.
The park will not require significant amounts of grading. Manufacturai slopes will be created at
the portion of the site sdjsnmt to the Senior Cesmsr. Any unstable condiu'om will be mitigated
through planting of slopes for erosion control (tlmst is consisUmt with Uniform Building Code
Standards and Ordinance No. 4~7) and through proper compaction of the soils. Construction and
grading for this development will not be sx deptls which would affect any geologic substructures.
No impacts are foreseen as a result of this project.
1.b.
Yes, The proposal will result in the disruption, displacement, compaction, or overcovering of the
soil. All grading activity requires disruptiota, displacements, compaction and overcovering of the
soil. The amount of disruption, disphtcem, mt. compaction and overcovering of the soil will be the
minimllm amollBl Iloalod to realizes the project. No sig!fi~callt impacts are anticipated as a result
of this project.
I.C.
Yes. The proposal will result in a change in the site topography and ground surfaz relief features.
A majority of the site is relatively flaX. Additional grsiing is proposed for the project, therefore
the topography and ground surface relief features will be modified. The newly cresled slopes will
be similar to those created on the Seaior Center site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
1.d.
No, The proposal will not result in the destruction, covering or modification of any unique
geologic or physicsl fesmres. No unique geologic features exist on the site. No significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this projea.
1.e.
Yes. Development of the site will result in increased wind and water erosion of sobs both on and
off-site. Grading will ocazr during the construction phase for the project. In addition, the poential
for wind and wate~ erosiota of soil will increase from the creation of m~mzfac~tred slopes on the
eastern portion of the site that is adjacent to the Senior Center. Short-term impaCtS will be
midgatecl through grading techniques that are col~istealt with Air Qtlafity regulatio!~ alld best
grading prscfices. Long-ram iml~,acts will be mitigated through site landscaping ssl the
construction of hardscape. Erosion control nmsms will be imp, !ems~ed as a condition of
approval for the project and will have to be consistent with Uniform Building Code Standards and
Ordinance No. 457. This will sure that no significant impam arise as a result of this project.
Yes. The proposal will resttit in changes in siltation, deposition, and erosion. Reference response
1 .e. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
1.g.
No. The proposal will not result in modifications to any wash, channel, creek, river or lake. None
exist on the projea site, nor are proximate to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as
a result of this project.
l.h.
Yes. Development of the site will expose people and property to earthquake hazards because the
pwject is located in Southern California, an area which is seismically active. Any potential impacts
will be mitigated through building comtruction which is comistent with Uniform Building Code
R:~T~ICKS.I~ 2/14/94 klb 7
1. i.
2.a,b.
2.c.
Water
3.a.
3.b.
3.c.
3.d.
standards and proper ground compsmion. The projea will not expose people or property to
geologic hazards such as landslides, mudslides, ground failure or liquefmion. No known
landslides are located on the site or pro~imMt,- to the site. The same is true for muclslidem. The
project will expose people or property to geologic hazards such as ground failure or liquefaction
because the projea is lotaxed in a liquefaXion/subsideuce zoee. (as identified in the City of
Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Im,nsct Report). Again, potential impacts will be
mitigated through building construction which is comistmt with Uniform Building Code standards
and proper ground compaction. No significant i,mpscts are anticipated as a mult of this projea.
No. The proposal does not include development within an Aiquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone as
identified by the State of California, Resourue Agency Depathuent of Conservation Special Studies
Zone Map. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Yes. The project will result in air emissiom and deterioration of ambient air quality in the short-
run. Air emissions and objectionable odors will occur during the comtruction phase of the pwject.
These impacts will be of short duration and are not comidered significant. There will be no air
emissiom or deterioration of ambient air quality in the long run. No significant impacts are
anticipated 8s a result of this project.
No. The project wfil not result in alterations of air movement, temperature, or moisture, or in any
change in clima~ either locally or regionally. The scale of the project precludes it from creating
any significant impacts on the environment in this area.
No. The proposal will not result in changes to currents, to the course or direction of water
movements in either marine or fresh waters. The project site is not locm~ adjscent to marhe
waters and is sufficiently removed from fresh water sources. No sigaificsm impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
Yes. The proposal w~! result in changes to absorption rates, drainage parterre and the rate and
mount of surface runoff. Previously permeable ground will be rendered impervious by
comtruction of bu~dings, accompanylug hardscape and driveways. While absorption r818 and
surface runoff w~l change, impacts are mitigated through site design. Drainage conveyances w~l
be required which will safely and adequately handle any of the runoff which is created by the
realization of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
No. The proposal will not result in alterafiom to the course or flow of flood waters. The project
is adjacent to the one hundred and five hundred year flood plain; however, it is not located within
an identified floodway. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
No. The proposal w~l 'not result in a change in the amount of surface water in any waterbody.
I ~ndsc-wping on site will allow a significant amount of'time water to drain inw the ground. No
signi~cam imp, acts are maticipated as a result of this project.
R:'~%'TAFF~ICK8.1S 2/14/94 kJb 8
3.e.
Yes, The proposal will result in dischargas into surface waters or in any alteration of surface water
quality. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for the project, the developer will be required to
comply with the requiretnents of the National Polhtant Disdm'ge Elimination System (NPDES)
permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an
NPDES Notice of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to .be exempt. By complying with
the NPDES requittozdts, any potential i,mpacts can be ~ to a level less than significant.
Therefore, no significant i-~,acts are anticipated as a result of this project.
3.f.
No. The proposal will not teetit in an alteration of the direction or rate of flow of groundwaters.
Construction on the site will not be at depths sufficie~ to have a significant impact on ground
waters. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
3.g.
No. The proposal will not result in a change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct
additions, withdrawals, or through inluc~tion of an aqulfer by cuts or excavations. Reference
response 3.f. No significant i,mpacts ae ~ as a result of this project.
3.h.
No, The project will not result in the reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for
public water supplies. Water service will ultimately be provided by Rancho California Water
District (RCWD) upon completion of financial affangements betwee~ RCWD and the propert]/
owner. No signi~ca!lt impacts ale anticipated as a result of this project.
3.i.
No, The proposal wHI not expose people or property to water related hazards such as flooding.
Reference responses 3.c. and 3.d. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Plant Life
4.a.
No, The proposal will not result in a change to the diversity of species, or number of any native
species of plants. The pwject is considered in-fill, With development surrounding it on all sides.
h addition, the majority of the site being previously graded arid subsequently i,ml, roved. A small
portion of the site will require additional grading; however, it has also been previously disturbed.
No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this projea.
4.b.
No. The proposal will not result in a reduction of the numben of any unique, rare, threatened,
or endangered species of plants. Reference response 4.a.
4.c.
No. Development of the site will not result in the creation of a barrier to the normal repltmlahmeswt
of existing species. Reference response 4.a.
4.d.
No. The proposal will not result in a reduction in the acreage of any agricultural crop. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project since no prime farmland_, farmland of
statewide or local importance, or unique farmland is located within the project site.
5.a.b.d.e. No, The projea will not result in a change in the diversity of species, or nmnbers of species of
animals. The project site lies within the Riverside Comny Stephem Kangaroo Rat Habitat
Conservation Plan Pre]im½nsry Study Area, however, the project itself will not im.nact the habitat
of the Stephens Kangaroo Rat (SKR). The site has been previously developed and consists of
R:~'I'AF~ICKS.IS 2/14/94 klb 9
stmaures, harriscape, lsn4sc~ping and din. The project is considered *in~!!* with development
existing to the north, south, east and west. There is no potential for the change in the diversity and
number (reduction) of the species, or in producing a barrier to the miXration of Stephem Kangaroo
1~ as well as the deterioration of its habitat exists within the project area. SKR Mitigation Fees
are not required for the developm~ of parcels used by local governmmal entities (as per Section
10(e) of Ordinance No. 663). No other sensitive species have been identified upon the site. No
significant impacts are anticipamd as a result of this project.
5.c.
No, The proposal will not result in the introduction of any new wildlife species into the area. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Noise
Yes, The proposal will result in increases to existing noise levels. The site is currently utilized
as a patio site and the project proposes to e~and the park use snd add a museinn. The m-seum
and park will be used primm-ily during the day. htustate 1~ is located to the ent. Commercial
uses exist to the north and west of the project. The Senior Center and Fire Deparunent are located
to the south. These are not considered sensitive rccr, ptots as identified in the City of Temecula
General Plan. No significsnt ',nnpacts from noise are anticipated as a result of this projea.
6.b.
Yes. The project will expose people to severe noise levels during the development/construction
phase. Commsaion mach~ is capable of producing noise in the range of 10 0+ DBA at 100
feet which is considered very annoying and can csuse hearing dsmage from steady 8-hour exposure.
This source of noise will be of short duration and therefore will not be comidered significant. No
significant impacts are anticipated either in the short- or long-run.
6.c.
Yes, The proposal will result in the exposure of people to severe vibratiom during the
development/construction phase. The vibratiom will be of short duration and therefore will not
be considered significant. No significant in~,acts are anticipated either in the short or long run.
Light and Glare
Yes. The proposal will ultimately produce and result in light/glare, ~ devel~memt of the
site will include new light sources. All light and glare has the potential to impact the Mount
Palomar Observatory and surrounding development. The project is conditioned to be comistent
with Ordinance No. 655 (Ordinance Regulating Light Pollution). No impacts are foreseen from
light and glare.
Land Use
8.a.
Yes. The proposal will not significantly allmr the present land use of the' si2. The Master Plan
will enhance and slightly expand the park and reloca2 the muse,m from its current Main Street
location. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:~STA~ICKS.I~ 2114/94 Idb
8.b.
No. The proposal will not result in an alterSion t~ the funue planned land use of the site as
described City's General Plan. The General Plan land Use desipstlon for the site is Open
SpsrgRsn'mion. The Old Town Specific Plan designstion for the site is Old Town Civic which
is irqended to provide for public and quasi-public uses such ss parks sad m. se,,n~. No siSnificant
impsas are anticipated as a result of this project.
9.a,b.
Yes. The proposal will result in an increase in the rate of use of any natural resource or the
depletion of any nonrenewable resource. Development of the site will result in an increase in the
rate of use of natural resources (consUuaion materials, fuels for the daily operation, asphalt,
lumber) and the subsequent depletion of these non-renewable natural resmsrc~. Due to the scale
of the proposed development, these im,~ are not seen as significant.
lUsk of U~e~
lO.a,b.
No. The proposal will not result in a risk of explosion, or the release of any hazardous substances
in the event of an accident or upset conditiom, since none are proposed in the request. The same
is true for the use, storage, trampon or disposal of any hn-J,'dous or toxic materials. No
significant impacts are anticip~_,L~4__ as a result of this project.
lO.c.
No. The project will not hU, fuc with an emergency response plan or an em~gency evaluation
plan. The subject site is not located in an area which could impat an e, mugct~y response plan.
The project will take atlas from mnintnined streeB (lVloreno Road axK! ~ Street) ~ will
therefore not impede any emergmcy req)onse or uuugu~y wacum~n plaas. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this projea.
Population
ll.
No. The project will not result in altering the location, distribution, demity or growth rate of the
human population of the area. Pwjects of this nature do not cause people to reloca2. No
significant imp~ are anticipated as a result of this project.
Housir~
12.
No. Reference response 11. Projects of this nature do not cause people to relocate, and therefore,
additional homing needs will not be aea2d. No significant i,mpacts are anticipated as a result of
this project:
Transportatioll/Ciresdofinn
13.a.
No. The proposal will not result in the generation of substantial additional vehicular movement.
The site is awrently used as a park and this use will be continued. The mu~e ,m component will
not result in the generation of substantial additional vehicular movement since it will be included
as a component of the park Master Plan. No significant impacts are eap~tecl from development
of the site.
13 .b.
Yes. The project will result in an increased demand for new parking. Forty-five (45) parking
spaces will be provided on site (six spaces already exist, the rest will be provided under the Park
Master Plan. Although, Ordinance No. 348 requires one parking space for every two employees
plus one spsce for every 300 square feet of gross floor area, the projea is located within the Old
Town Specific Plan Planning Area. Parking standards will not be the same as those required und~er
0rdinnnce No. 348. Any pote~jal i,m1~lcts Call be tttitigated by fllRlre parking lots that will be
dispersed throughout the Old Town area. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
13.c.
No. The proposal will not crea~ impacts upon existing transportation systems, including public
transportation. All of the streets surrounding the project have been improved to their full-width.
A Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) route is currently available in the srea (Front, Main snd
Mercedes Streets). The project is not anticipated to impsct RTA's level of service. No significant
impacts are anficipn_!erJ as n result of this project.
13 .d.
No. The proposal will not result in alteratiom to present patterns of circulation or movement of
people and/or goods. The site is cm~catly developed as a park and is ~ from streets that
are already develolasd to their ultimnto. fight-of-way. No significsnt impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
13.e.
No. The proposal will not result in alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic since none exists
currently in the proximity of the site and none are proposed. No significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
13.f.
No. The proposal will not result in an increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians. Future development of the si~e will not increase traffic hazards above current
conditions. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Public Services
14.a,b.
No. The proposal will not have a substsntial effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered fire
or police protection. The park and m-q~tam will incre, as, atally increase theneed for fire and police
protection, however, due to the scale of the proposed development, these impaCtS are not seen as
significant.
14.c.
No. The proposal will not have a substantial effect upon or result in a need for new or altered
school facilitim. Projects of this nature generally do not have effects upon the need for school
facilities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
14.d.
No. The proposal will not have a substantial effect upon or result in a need for new or altered
parks or other recreational facilities. The project wHI be beneficial to the Old Town Area and the
City of Temoada as a whole because it will result in the msint~snce and enhance-mere of an
existing park si~e. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this-project.
R:~"'I"AFFIF'T%SAilg..ilCKS.IS 2/14/94 ~ 12
14.e.
14.f.
15.a.
15 .b.
Utilities
16.a
16.b.
16.c.
16.d.
16.e.
No. The proposal will result in a need for the mnint~n~Ce Of public facilities, including roads.
Funding for maintenance of roads is derived from the Gasoline Tax which is distributed to the City
of Teme~la from the State of California. Imams to curtrot and future needs for maintman~ of
roads as a restfit of development of the site are incrememl, are not comidered significant. This
is because the Gasoline Tax is sufficient to cover any of the proposed expenses.
No. The proposal will not have a substantial affect upon or result in a need for new or altered
governxnmtal services. No significant impacts are anticipatsd u a result of this projea.
No. The proposal will not result in the use of substantial anmunts of fuel or energy. As mentioned
in responses 9.a. and 9.b. the proposal my result in an increase in the rate of use of any natural
resource or the depletion of any nonrenewable resource. Development of the site will result in an
increase in the rate of use of natural resources (construaion ~ala, fuels for the daily operation,
asphalt, lumber ) and the subsequent depletion of these non-renewable natural resources. Due to
the scale of the proposed developmint, these imp am are not seen as significant.
No. The project will not result in a substantial inaease in demand upon existing sources of energy,
nor will the project require the development of new sources of energy. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
No. ~ne proposal will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alteratiom to power or
natural gas. The project site is within pro~imiW of existing facilities. Development exisu to the
north, south, and east of the site and they already receive these services. No significant in~.acts
are anticipged as a result of this project.
No. The proposal will not result in a need for new systems or substantial aimrations to
communication systems (reference response No. 16.a.)? No significant impacts are anticipated as
a result of this projea.
No. The proposal will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alteratiom to water
systems. As mentioned in response 3.h., water service will ultimat~ be provided by Rancho
California Water Distria (RCWD) upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and
the property owner. 'No significant i~ are anticipated as a result of this project.
No. The proposal will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alteratiom to sanitary
sewer systems. The project is located within Eastern Municipal Wger District's (EMWD) sanitary
sewer service area. Information contained in the ~ Plan Final Environmental Impact Report
(Certified November 9, 1993) states that adequate facilities exist (and are proposed) which will
adequately service the projea. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
No. The proposal will result in a need for new sysUnm or substantial alteratiom to on-site storm
water drainaZe systems. The proposal will result in changes to absorption rates, drainage pn__-__orns
and the rate and amount of surface nmoff. Previously penramble ground wH! be rendered
impervious by constructionof buildings, accompanying bardscape and driveways. While absorption
R:'~"rAFFN:rf~Ail41CKS.IS 2/14/94 kJb 13
rates and surface runoff will change, impacts are mitigated through site design. Drainage
conveyances will be required which will safely and adequacy handle any ofthe runoff which is
creat~l by the realization of the project. No significant impacts are micipated as a result of this
project.
16.f.
No. The proposal will not result in a need for new systems or subs~mtial alterations to solid waste
disposal systems. Any potential impacts from solid waste created by this development can be
mitigated through participation in any Source Reduction. and Recycling Programs which are
implemented by the City. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
16.g.
No. The proposal will not result in a disjointed or inefficient pattern of utility delivery system
improvements for any of the above. (reference response No. 16.a.). No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
Human Health
17.a,b.
No. The proposal will not result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard.
Projects of this nature do not result in the creation of health hazards or potential health hazards.
No significant impacts are antieip__n__~a__ as a result of this project.
Aesthetics
18.a.
No. The proposal will not result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public.
None exist on site, nor are any proximate to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
18.b.
No. The proposal will not result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public
view. The site is currently being used as a park. The Master Plan component .shall serve to
enhance the site. Elevatiom for the mum,m building will have to be approved by the Old Town
Temecula Local Review Board; thereby ensuring compatibility with the Old Town area. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
18.c.
No. The proposal will not result in detrimental visual impacts on the surrounding area. Reference
response 18.b.
Recreation
19.
Yes. The proposal will result in impacts to the quality or quantity of existing recreational resources
or opportunities. The site is currently used as a park site and this site will be _enhnm'ed via the
Master Plan process. No significant impacts are snticipamd as a result of this project.
Cultural Resoures
20.a.
No. The proposal will not result in the alteration or deattuction of any paleontologic, prehistoric,
archaeological or historic site. The site has been previously disturbed. The City of Temeada
General Plan Enviro~tal Impact Report (Certified Novmnber 9, 1993) indicates that there is a
low possibility that paleontologic, prehistoric, archaeological or historic sites exist on the subject
project site. No'significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:WrAFFRP~SNV~ICKS.tS 2/14m4 Idb 14
20.b.
20.c.
No, The proposal will not restfit in adverse physical or aesthetic effec~ to a prehistoric or historic
building, structure or object. Reference response 20.b. No significant in~,acts are anticipated as
a result of this project.
No, The project will not have the potential ~o cause a physical change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values. No "unique" ethnic ~ values exist on-site or in proximity to the site.
No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
20.d.
No, The proposal will not result in restrictiota to exisdn,~ religious or sacred uses within the
potential im,nact area. None curready exist on the si~e. No significant in~,ects are anticipated as
a result of this projea.
tab 15
lY. MANDATORY FINDING~ OF ~IGNIFICANCE
Does the project have the potential to either: degrade
the quality of the environment, substmially reduce the
habitat of a fish, wildlife or bird species, cause a fish,
wildlife or bird population to drop below self sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant, bird or animal
species, or eliminnt~, ilnpORRzlt exaH!ples Of the major
periods of California history or prehistoty?.
Yes
Does the project have the potential to achieve short
term, to the disadvantage of long term, environmental
goals? (A short term im,nact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long term im,nacts will endure well into the
future.)
Does the project have impacts which are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project's
impact on two or more separate resources may be
relatively small, but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environnlent is sigliificant. )
Does the project have enviromucntal effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?.
X
V. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME wDE MINIMUS" IMPACT FINDINGS
Does the project have the potential to cause any adverse effect,
either individually or cumulatively, on fish and wildlife resources?
Wildlife is defined as "all wfid animals, birds, plants, fish,
amphibians, and related ecological COmmUnitieS, including the
habitat upon which the wildlife depends on for it's COntinued
viability" (Section 711.2, Fish and Game Code).
Yes
No
R:'~"TAF~ICK$.m 2114/'a,4. Idb 16
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION w~l be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect
on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case
because the Mitigation Measures described on the ~tach~ shem and
in the Conditiom of Approval that have been added ~o the project will
mitigate any potentially significant impacts m a level of insignificance,
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
/~~ ~" ~,,
~a'Nanz and Title
R:~T~ICK$.IS 2/14/94 klb 17
RED'EVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM
~,PPROV~T.
FCiITY ATTORNEY /'~
NANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGI~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/Redevelopment Agency Board Members
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
April 5, 1994
Resolution RDA 94- Authorizing Investment in the Local Agency
Investment Fund (LAIF)
PREPARED BY:
Genie Roberrs, Chief Accountant
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Agency Members adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AUTHORIZING INVESTMENT OF DISTRICT
MONIES IN THE LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT
FUND
DISCUSSION: The City currently pools the cash of all funds and invests surplus funds
in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)..LAIF allows $15 million to be invested for each
City entity. Currently the City has accounts in the name of the City and Temecula Community
Services District. The City is quickly approaching the $30 million limit and it is necessary to
establish an account in the name of the Redevelopment Agency to allow continued investment
in LAIF.
The Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) is a special fund of the California State Treasury.
The State Treasurer takes monies deposited in the fund by local governments and invests
them in a pooled investment account in order to achieve the highest possible yields for the
local governments. The State Treasurer is responsible for the control and safekeeping of all
instruments of title for all investments in the Fund. The local governments determine the term
of the investments and there is no penalty for early withdrawal. Cash can be withdrawn from
the fund with as little as 24 hours notice.
During fiscal year 1992/93 the fund paid an average yield of 4.711%.
ending December 31, 1993, the fund paid an average yield of 4.376%.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
During the quarter
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 94- __
ARESOLUTION OF THE I~'3'sEV~OPIMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING INVESTMENT
OF DISTRICT MONIES IN THE LOCAL AGENCY
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 730 of the statutes of 1976 Section 16429.1 was
added to the California Government Cede to ereate a Local Agency Investment Fund in the State
Treasury for the deposit of money of a local agency for purposes of investment by the State
Treasurer; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directon does hereby find that the deposit and
withdrawal of money in the Local Agency Inv~t Fund in accordance with the provisions
of Section 16429.1 of the Government Code for the purpose of investment as stated therein as
in the best interests of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency.
NOW, THElzI~-!~RE, BE IT RESOLVEB, the Redevelopmerit Agency of the
City of Temecula does hereby authorize the deposit and withdrawal of Temecula Redevelopmerit
Agency monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund in the State Treasury in accordance with
the provisions of Section 16429.1 of the Government Code for the purpose of investment as
Section 1. That the following Temecula Redevelopment Agency'
of~cers/designees or their successors in office shah be authorized to order the deposit or
withdrawal of monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund.
Genernl Mnn~,er
Name Title Signature'
Assistnut City Man~er
Name Title Signature
Section 2. That the Secretary of the Agency shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this resolution.
PASSb~D, APPROV~D AND ADO~ this Sth day of April, 1994.
ATTEST:
Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson
Secretary
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, 5ecretaxy of the Temect~a Redevelopment Agency, HEREBY DO
CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. RDA 94~ was duly adopted at a regular meeting
of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency on the 5th day of April, 1994 by the following roll call
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
June S. Greek, Secretary
ITEM
NO.
2
APPROV ; 'Y' ~ '
CITY ATTORNE~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Redevelopment Agency Board Members
Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director
April 5, 1994
Authorization of Agreement for RDA Consulting Services
PREPARED BY:
Mary Jane McLamey, Finance Officer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the terms of the agreement for RDA
Consulting services with PMW Associates and authorize the Chairperson to execute the
agreement, subject to the approval of the Executive Director end the General Council as to the
final form of the agreement.
DISCUSSION: With the passage of AB1290 and the impending Memorandum of
Understanding between the RDA and TZBG, Inc. (Zev Buffman), activities of the
Redevelopmerit Agency (RDA) have grown in scope and complexity. In addition~ the deadline
of December 31 for adoption of a Iow/mod housing plan is rapidly approaching and existing
staff does not have the expertise to prepare such a plan to conform to RDA law. Therefore,
staff recommends entering into a contract for temporary RDA consulting services with Marilyn
Whisenand of PMW Associates. Ms Whisenand has extensive experience directing
redevelopment agencies including Escondido and Costa Mesa. The scope of work for the
contract shall include:
Review and status of redevelopment and housing program activities within the
City of Temecula; provide advice, assistance and technical support as necessary
to meet the goals and objectives of the City and Redevelopment Agency.
With the assistance of existing staff, prepare the implementation plan and
housing compliance plan which are required to be adopted prior to December
31, 1994 in accordance with new legislation (AB1290).
Calculate the Redevelopment Agency's "excess surplus" housing funds
(required by AB1290) and develop an excess surplus expenditure plan. The
plan will meet all legal requirements and will provide a framework for future
policy decisions with respect to the use of housing funds.
R:WORTONLt,4GENDASIRDACON$.AGN 3/29/94
Represent the City of Temecula and its Redevelopment Agency in negotiations
with prospective developers, including TZBG, Inc. who have proposed an
entertainment center for Temecula Old Town.
Provide instruction and training to existing staff with respect to the
administration of redevelopment and housing programs including new
requirements resulting from the passage of AB1290.
Although the contract only runs through July 31, 1994, the above scope of services includes
sufficient training for existing staff to carry on with redevelopment activities including the
housing element after the contract has expired.
Compensation shall be $95.00 per hour up to 30 hours per week. Time over 30 hours shall
be compensated at $120.00per hour. Staff estimates a $35,000expenditure for this contract
for the balance of FY 1994.
FISCAL IMPACT: Sufficient funds exist in the RDA consulting budget to fund this
contract through June 30, 1994. The balance of the contract will be included in the FY 94-95
budget.
Attachments:
PMW Associates Biography - Marilyn Whisenand
PMW Associates Resume on Marilyn Whisenand
Client List
Consultant Services Agreement
R:INORTONLtAGENDASIRDACONS. AGN 3/29/94
P M W Associates
232 West Avenida Gaviota, San Clemente, California 92672 (714)498-7085 FAX (714)498-8262
BIOGRAPHY
MARILYN WHISENAND-
Ms. Whisenand, Executive Vice President and co-
owner of PMW Associates, is an independent consult-
ant under contract to a number of public and private
sector clients involved in the planning and implemen-
tation of redevelopSent, economic development and
housing activities.
A specialist in public/private partnerships, Ms.
Whisenand has had over 20 years of experience in
negotiating and administering development agree-
ments for major retail, commercial and residential
projects. She has served as Executive Director of
Redevelopmeat Agencies in Costa Mesa and Escou-
dido, California and Auggrant Vice President of the
Centre City Development Corporation, San Diego,
California.
Ms. Whisenand holds a degree in Business Adminis-
tration from the University of Redlands and a
Certificate in Real Estate. A licensed California
'Real Estate Broker, she received a fellowship from
the National Endowment for Humanities for in-
residence postgraduate work in economics at Prince-
ton University in 1977. Ms. Whisenand is a full
member of the Urban Land Institute, tht California
Association for Local Economic Development and the
Community Redevelopmeat Agencies' Association.
Awards received for projects completed under the
direction of Ms. Whisenand include, the Department
of Housing and Urban Development "Certificate of
National Recognition" for innovative use of
public/private partnership for the Lincoln Park
Mesa multi-family residential project in Costs Mesa,
California; the American Planning Association
*Meritorious Program Award*, the Urban Land Insti-
tute "Award of Excellence*, and the Pacific Coast
Builders' Conference *Golden Nugget Award* for the
Costs Mesa Courtyards, a mixed-use retail/commer-
cial development in downtown Costs Mesa; and the
Urban Land Institute *Award of Excellence* for the
Escondldo Civic and' Cultural Center, a 116 million
dollar Civic and Cultural complex in downtown
Escondldo, California.
P M W Associates
232 West Avenida Gaviota, San Clemente, California 92672 (714) 498-7085 FAX (714) 498-8262
MARILYN WHISENAND
232 West Avenida Gaviota
San Clemente, CA 92672
Telephone:
(714) 498-3951 (home)
(714) 498-7085 (work)
(714) 498-8262 (FAX)
EDUrATION
B.S. Business Administration, University of Redlands
Real Estate Certificate, San Diego City .College
Economics Fellowship, National Endowment for the Humanities;
Princeton University
BUSINESS HISTORY
March 1986
Present
Principal and co-owner of PMW Associates, a corporation
providing economic development, redevelopment, and housing
services on a consultant basis to a variety of public and private
organizations.
March 1986 to
May 1991
Executive DIrector
Community Development Commission-City of Escondido, Califor-
nia
Served as Executive Director, under contract to the Community
Development Commission, responsible for planning, financing
and construction of a S116 million Civic Center and Cultural Arts
Complex including City Hall, Regional Government Offices,
Performing Arts Theaters, a Fine Arts Museum and Conference
and Convention Facilities. Administered redevelopment activities
within a 3,000 acre redevelopmeat area including downtown
revitalization elements and a $55 million housing program.
Managed a professional staff of ten along with numerous consult-
ant contracts.
In addition, with the approval of the Community Development
Commission, maintained a private consulting practice contracting
with a variety of public and private sector clients.
MARILYN WHISENAND
BUSINESS HISTORY
(coat.)
Page 2
April 1982 to
March 1986
Executive Director
Redevelopmeat Agency-City of Costa Mesa, California
Administered redevelopmeat projects within Costa Mesa's 275
acre downtown redevelopmeat area. Responsible for the negotia-
tion, financing and structuring of public/private partnerships
resulting in the development of approximately $75 million of
housing and commercial projects.
Awards received for these projects include the Department of
Housing and Urban Development Certificate of National Recog-
nition for innovative use of a public/private partnership; the
American Planning Association Meritorious Program Award; the
Urban Land Institute Award of Excellence; and Pacific Coast
Builders' Conference "Golden Nugget* Awards for the best retail
commercial project and the best commercial/industrial mixed-use
plan in the fourteen western states.
August 1977 to
March 1982
July 1975 to
August 1977
Assistant Vice President
Centre City Development Corporation-San Diego, California
Responsible for redevelopmeat activities within downtown San
Diego, administered all facets of redevelopmeat implementation
including financial planning; land acquisition/disposition and
negotiation of development agreements. Managed twelve profes-
sional staff and numerous consultant contracts; prepared and
administered a $49 million annual budget, Actively participated
in the negotiation, financing, and development of the Hotton
Plaza project, a mixed-use urban regional shopping center, and
two market rate housing projects, Marina Park nnd Park Row.
Personally responsible for the planning, financing and construe-
tion management of three high-rise senior citizen housing devel-
opments totaling 845 units.
Management Assistant to the City Manager
City of San Diego-San Diego, California
Responsible for the administration of a $10.5 million Communi-
ty Development Block Grant Program, and the coordination of
various EDA funded projects. Responsible for the reorganization
and management of the City's Housing and Community Develop-
ment Department.
MARILYN WHISENAND
BUSINESS HISTORY
(cont.)
Page 3
July 1970 to
July 1975
Community Development Specialist
City of San Dicgo-San Diego, California
Served as Project Manager for an 18 acre industrial development
project in addition to responsibility for city-wide relocation as-
sistance programs.
October 1965 to
June 1970
Director of Relocation and Property Management/
Executive Director Indio Housing Authority
Redevelopment Agency, City of Indio, Indio, California
Responsible for establishing and implementing acquisition, relo-
cation and' property management programs for two federally
fundcd urban renewal projects. Established local Housing Au-
thority and served as its Executive Director.
AFFILIATIONS AND
ALHIi::Vt=MbN's
MEMBERSHIPS
o Named Woman of the Year in the San Diego Construction
Industry by the Building Contractors Association-1981
o Awarded "Tribute to Woman and Industry* by the San Diego
County YMCA 1981
o Licensed California Real Estate Broker
o Extensive Public Speaking
o Expert Witness on Redevelopment and Public Acquisition
Matters
o Awarded "Certificate of National Recognition' by the De-
partment of Housing and Urban Development
o Awarded "Meritorious Program award" by the Urban Land
Institute; 'Award of Excellence" on the Pacific Coast Builders'
Confcrence; "Golden Nugget award' for the Costs Mesa Court-
yards
o 'Award of Excellence' by the Urban Land Institute for the
Escortdido Civic and Cultural Center
o California Association for Local Economic Development
o California Redevelopment Agencies Association
o Full member - Urban Land Institute
P M W Associates
232 West Avenida Gaviota, San Clemente. California 92672 (714)498-7085 FAX (714)498-8262
REDEVELOPMENT DIVISION CLIENTS
- 1992/1993-
CITIES
Redevelopmeat Agency
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Redevelopmeat Agency
CITY OF COSTA MESA
Redevelopment Agency
CITY OF FONTANA
Redevelopmeat Agency
CITY OF HUNTINGTON
BEACH
REFERENCE
SERVICES PROVIDED
James D. Ruth
City Manager
200 S. Annhelm BIrd.
Annhelm. CA 92085
(714)999-5165
Redevelopmeat Plan implementation/
negotiations with developer of
commercial/residential development.
Allan Roeder
City Manager
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
(714)754-5327
Developer selection and negotiations for
$35 million mixed-use project, including
hotel, residential, retail and commercial
use. Full range of redevelopmeat admin=
istration, including analysis of financial
alternatives. direction of acquisition and
relocation program. _
John O'Sullivan
City Manager
8353 Sierra Avenue
Funtans, CA 92335
(714)350-7654
Redevelopmeat Plan implementation,
including negotiation for development
agreement for promotional retail center.
Michael Uberuaga Redevelopmeat Plan implementation/
City Manager negotiations with developer and property
2000 Main Street owners for mixed-use development.
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
(714)960-g899
Redevelopmeat Agency
CITY OF PALMDALE
Robert W. Toone, Jr.
City Administrator
708 E. Palmdale Bird.
Palmdale, CA 93550
(805)273-3126
Developer selection and negotiations
for a regional shopping center, imple-
mentation planning, coordination of
redevelopmeat activities.
1
CLIENT REFERENCE SERVICES PROVIDED
Redevelopment Agency
CITY OF POWAY
Redevelopmeat Agency
CITY OF SANTEE
Redevelopmeat Agency
CITY OF TUSTIN
Redevelopmeat Agency
CITY OF LA PALMA
Redevelopmeat Agency
CITY OF ONTARIO
Redevelopmeat Agency
CITY OF PLACENTIA
RedeveLopmeat Agency
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE
Jim Bowersox
City Manager
13325 Civic Center Drive
Poway,CA 92064
(619)748-6600
Negotiations for the purchase and con-
version to city ownership of a 265 space
mobile home park. Structured a convet- '.
sion plan and administered its implemen-
tation.
Reba Wright Quastler
Director of Planning Services
13325 Civic Center Drive
Poway, CA 92064
(619)748-6600
Ronald L. Ballard
City Manager
10765 Woodside Avenue
Santee, CA 92071-3198
(619)562-6153
Implementation planning, coordination
of market and project feasibility studies,
developer negotiations, coordination of
tax allocation bond sales.
William Huston
City Manager
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92680
(714)544-8890
All aspects of redevelopment, adminis-
tration, including developer negotiations,
financial planning, financing, and legis-
lative analysis.
Pamela Gibson
City Manager
78922 Walker Street
La Palma, CA 90623
(714)523-7700
Preparation of Request for qualifica-
tions; developer negotiations
Housing Set-Aside Plan.
Norman Priest
Executive Director
303 East B Street
Ontario, CA 91764
(714)986-1151
Redevelopment Plan Feasibility Study.
Robert D'Amato
City Manager
401 East Chapman
Placentia, CA 92670
(714)993-8231
Redevelopment Plan Feasibility Study;
Redevelopment Plan Adoption
Housing Set-Aside Plan.
Mike Parness
City Manager
100 Avenida Presidio
San Clemente, CA 92672
(714)361-8229
Economic Development;
Strategy/Housing Set-Aside;
Plan/Developer Negotiations.
2
CLIENT REFERENCE SERVICFS PROVIDED
Redevelopmeat Agency
CITY OF DANA POINT
McKellar Development
La Julia, CA
San Diego State
University Foundation
Redevelopmeat Agency
CITY OF ESCONDIDO
William Talley
City Manager
33282 Golden Lantern
Dana Point, CA 92629
(714)248-9890
Economic Development; Redevelopmerit
Plan Feasibility Study.
Christopher McKellar Redevelopmerit Planning;
Chief Executive Officer Implementation/Public-Private Financing.
1250 Prospect Street, Ste. 10:3
La Julia, CA 92122
(619)4593891
Harry Albers
General Manager
5178 College Avenue
San Diego, CA 92182
(619)594-5771
Project Management of a
$175 million dollar redevelopment
project including student housing,
retail/commercial and hotel uses.
Doug Clark
City Manager
201 North Broadway
Escondido, CA 92626
(619)741-4631
Project Management of a $101 million
dollar cultural arts project;
Downtown Revitalization;
Housing Set-Aside Program.
P M W Associates
232 West Avenida Gaviota, San Clernente, California 92672 (714) 498-7085 FAX (714) 498-8262
:- ONSULTANT SERVIc-F-q AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made at TemecUla, California as of , 1994 by
and between THE CITY OF TEMECULA (*CITY*), AND PMW ASSOCIATES, INC.
(*CONSULTANT*), who agree as follows:
Services: Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Consult-
ant shall provide City with the services described in Exhibit *A.*
Payment: City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this
Agreement at the time and in the manner set forth in Exhibit *B.* The payments
specified in Exhibit *B* shall be the only payments to be made to Consultant for
services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall submit all billings
for said services to City in the manner specified in Exhibit *B.*
Staff Assistance and Information: City shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish
all staff assistance and information which may be required for furnishing services
pursuant to this Agreement as defined in Exhibit *A.*
General Provisions: The general provisions set forth in Exhibit *C* are part of this
Agreement. In the event of any inconsistency between said general provisions and
any other terms or conditions of this Agreement, the other terms or conditions
shall control only insof at as they are inconsistent with the general provisions.
Exhibits: All exhibits referred to herein are attached hereto and are by this refer-
ence incorporated herein.
EXECUTED as of the day stated above.
CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
By:
PMW ASSOCIATES
By:
E~~v~~desident
EXHIBIT "A"
SCOPe- OF ~,RVIC~-R
Marilyn Whisenand, through PMW Associates, will act as interim staff to the City of
Temecula, responsible for the planning and implementation of all redevelopment and
housing programs. The specific scope of services is summarized as follows:
Review the status of redevelopment and housing program activities within
the City of Temecula; provide advice, assistance and technical support as
necessary to meet the goals and objectives of the City and Redevelopment
Agency.
With the assistance of existing staff, prepare the implementation plan and
housing compliance plan which are required to be adopted prior to Deeera-
ber 31, 1994 in accordance with new legislation (ABI290).
Calculate the Redevelopment Agency's "excess surplus" housing funds
(required by ABI290) and develop an excess surplus expenditure plan. The
plan will meet all legal requirements and will provide a framework for
future policy decisions with respect to the use of housing funds.
Represent the City of Temecula and its Redevelopment Agency in negotia-
tions with prospective developers, including TTBG, Inc. who have proposed
an entertainment center for Temecula Old Town.
Provide instruction and training to existing staff with respect to the admin-
istration of redevelopment and housing programs including new require-
ments resulting from the passage of ABI290.
METHOD AND TIMF- OF PF-RFORMANCE
Consultant Shall perform the various services described herein only as and when requested
by the City and within a time schedule as mutually agreed upon by the parties to this
Agreement.
EXHIBIT 'B'
COMPF-NSATION
Hourly Rate:
PI~4W will provide the services of Marilyn Whisenand for 30 hours per week during the
contract period at the rate of $95.00 per hour. Services performed above 30 hours each
week will be billed at $120 per hour.
Direct Expense:
Directly related expenses will be billed at their actual cost; mileage will be billed at $.26
per mile.
Word processing and/or administrative support, if any, provided by PMW Associates will
be billed at the rate of $25.00 per hour.
METHOD OF PAYMENT
Consultant shall submit requisitions to City for the services completed.
City shall pay Consultant within thirty (30) days in accordance of such requisitions.
EXHIBIT 'C"
Indeoendent Contractor. At all times during the term of this Agreement,
Consultant shall be an independent contractor and shall not bc an employee of the
City. City shall have the right to control Consultant only insofar as the results of
Consultant's services rendered pursuant to this Agreement; however, City shall not
have the right to control the means by which Consultant accomplishes services
rendered pursuant to this Agreement.
Time. Consultant shall devote such time to the performance of services pursuant
to this. Agreement as may be reasonably necessary for satisfactory performance of
Consultnnt's obligations pursuant to this Agreement.
Consultant Not Anent. Except as City may specify in writing, Consultant shall
have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity
whatsoever as an agent. Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied,
pursuant to this Agreement to bind City to any obligation whatsoever.
Assinnment Prohibited. No party to this Agreement may assign any right or
obligation pursuant to this Agreement. Any attempted or purported assignment of
any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement shall be void and of no effect.
Channes. The City may, from time to time, request changes in the Scope of
Services of the Agreement to be performed hereunder. Such changes, including
any increase or decrease in the amount of Consultant's compensation, which are
mutually agreed upon by and between the City and the Consultant, shall be
incorporated in written amendments to this Agreement.
Notice of Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by the either party
upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other. The effective date of caneella-
tion being the 30th day of said written notice with no further action by either
party.
Termination. Upon termination of this Agreement by City, and written notifica-
tion to the Consultant, Consultant shall be entitled to the compensation earned by
it prior to the date of termination, computed pro rata up to and including the date
of termination.
Disclosure. Consultant's Principal, Marilyn Whisenand, is a licensed California
Real Estate Broker. However, in performing services under this contract,
consultant's assigned staff arc not acting in the capacity of a real estate broker nor
will they act as broker or receive commission as broker for any other party in
connection with this assignment.
Indemnification. City agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Consultant
from and against any and all claims, demands, damages of any kind or nature,
including attorney's fees, resulting from Consultant's work performed on behalf of
City 'under the terms of this agreement, excepting any claims due to the willful
negligence of Consultant.
I0.
Notice. All notices and other communications from either party to the other under
this agreement shall be in writing and addressed to such party at its address set
forth below. Either party may, by notice in writing to the other, change its ad-
dress for receipt of notices and other communications. Any notice or other
communications sent by mail, telex, telegraph, mailgram 5r fax shall bc deemed to
have been given on the day such notice or communication was sent.
Consultant:
Marilyn Whiscnand
Executive Vice-President
PIVI~' Associates
232 West Avenida Gayiota
San Clcmcnte, CA 92672
Foundation:
Ron Bradley
City Manager
City of Temccula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
11.
Consultant's Assistant(s). Consultant may from time to time employ the services of
employees or agents to assist the Consultant in the performance of Consultant's
duties hereunder; provided, however, that the Consultant shall be solely responsible
for any such agents or employees, including their performance, direction, control,
supervision and compensation.
12.
Attornev's Fees. If any action or suit in law or equity is instituted by or against
City or Consultant for breach, enforcement or interpretation of or otherwise in-
volving this agreement, the party prevailing in such action or suit shall be entitled
to the award of reasonable attorneys' fees in addition to whatever other relief such
party may bc entitled to.
13.
Return of Materials at Termination. In the event of any termination' of Consult-
ant's appointment, with or without cause, Consultant will promptly deliver to City
all materials, property, documents, data, and other information belonging to City.
Consultant shall not take any materials, property, documents or other information,
or any reproduction or excerpt thereof, belonging to City.
14.
Ownership of Work Product. Any and all of the work product performed and/or
developed by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement shall be the sole property of
City. City shall become and be the sole owner thereof and Consultant shall retain
no ownership, interest or rights therein.
15.
Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is found by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be void, contrary to existing laws or regulations or otherwise in-
valid, or unforesccable, the. remaining provisions hereof shall not be affected
thereby and shall remain in full force and effect.
16.
F. ntire Affreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the
parties hcreto with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes any prior or
contemporaneous oral or written agreements, understandings, promises and repre-
sentations made by either party to the other concerning the subject matter hereof.
This agreement cannot be changed or terminated orally and may only be changed
on behalf of either party in writing.
ITE'M
NO. 3
APPROVAT.
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/Redevelopment Agency Board Members
Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director ~1~ · ~'
April5,1994
Authorization of Agreement for Development Advisory Services for the
RDA
PREPARED BY:
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the terms of the agreement for
Development Advisory Services with Price Waterhouse and authorize the Chairperson to
execute the agreement, subject to the approval of the Executive Director and the General
Council as to the final form of the agreement.
DISCUSSION: On March 22, 1994 the City Council authorized an appropriation for
studies related to the Memorandum of Understanding with TZBG, Inc. (Zev Buffman). One of
the studies is to analyze the economic feasibility of the proposed project. Staff solicited and
received a proposal from Price Waterhouse. Staff requested this proposal based on the
extensive experience the firm has in performing studies for the entertainment industry. The
scope of work as fully described in the attached proposal is as follows:
Define the approximate level or scale of development (number and size of theater)
sufficient to:
Establish a "destination attraction"
and
Retain the long term commitment of a qualified developer/promoter/manager
and .
Produce sufficient net cash flow to obtain capital funding
and
Support related uses in the TRC area
Estimate levels of visitor activity generated by the theater complex and requirements
for the infrastructure and other activities needed to support that activity (parking,
traffic flow, site size and location requirements and destination marketing).
Estimate the level or range of economic and fiscal impacts generated by the proposed
development.
The cost of the study will not exceed $75,000 and is anticipatedto be completed in four to
five months.
FISCAL IMPACT: Sufficient funds exist for the City's portion of the fee. The
.balance will be billed to TZBG, Inc.
Attachment: Price Waterhouse proposal
Su~ie 280C'
400 Nc~.~ Asme; S~ree:
P O, Box 2645
Tamps, FL 33601-2640
Price Haterhouse
March 23, 1994
Mr. Ronald Bradley
Interim City Manager
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temeeula, CA 92590-3606
Dear Mr. Bradley:
Thank you for inviting the Price Waterhouse Development Advisory Group to submit
this proposal-agreement to provide economic planning services to the City of
Temeeula. This letter will describe our understanding of the background and objective
of the assignment, proposed scope of services, qualifications to perform these services,
time and budget requirements, terms of the engagement and authorization to proceed.
If, after reviewing this letter, you believe modifications to this proposed scope of
services would better suit your needs, we would be pleased to discuss this with you.
Background and Objectives of the Assignment
The City has adopted a Specific Plan for Old Town with the overall objective of
creating "a dynamic Old Town commercial and residential eore...providing a viable
economic setting for local and tourist commercial uses,...and residential uses...". The
plan includes zoning, development regulations, incentives and procedures to
accomplish this goal. Our understanding of the specific means by which this goal will
be accomplished and the economic planning issues to be considered is based on:
· Review of Old Town Temecula Specific Plan
· Discussions with Dawe Dixon, former City Manager and yourself over the past 3
months
· Review of proposed entertainment development prepared by Zev Buffman
· Tour of Old Town March 2 and subsequent review of maps, plans, aerial photo
and video of area provided by your staff
The renovation and redevelopmerit of Old Town will be dependent, in large part, on
attracting a sufficient level of non-resident visitors to the at~t to support the retail
shops, food/beverage establishments and lodging facilities for the Tourist Retail Core
CFRC) and the Highway Tourist Commercial (!tTC) areas contained in the plan. These
non-residcnt visitors will be drawn to the Old Town area by existing special. events and
Mr. Ronald Bradley
Page 2
attractions (historic buildings, wine/balloon festivals, antique shops, etc.) and the
proposed entertainment facilities to be developed by Mr. Zev Buffman, namely:
Opera House:
Cabaret Theaters:
Wild West Arena:
Showboat:
950 seat proseenium theater
2 @ 600 seats each
4,800 seat "show tent"
600 person capacity (450 seated)
In addition, the Buffman plan includes several additional physical facilities and
theatrical presentations which will link the primary entertainment or "anchor" theaters
to Old Town with:
· Saloons.
· Virtual Reality Presentations
· Production Studio CI'V, Radio, Recording)
· Outdoor Entertainment
· Competitions, games, festivals, award/tribute shows, etc.
It is planned that the anchor theaters and support amenities will be fully integrated
and compatible with other major elements of the Old Town development: commercial,
civic and residential. Moreover, the "anchor" entertainment establishments will be the
primary attractions which draw the additional visitors needed to support the
redevelopment of Old Town - to make it, in the words of the Specific Area Plan, "an
economically viable setting." The economic and financial planning for the
development of this entertainment complex must include sufficient economic analysis
to insure the following objectives are met:
1. Define the approximate level or scale of development (number and size of theater)
sufficient to:
· Establish a "destination attraction"
and
· Retain the long term commitment of a qualified developer/promoter/manager
and
· Produce sufficient net cash flow to obtain capital fuming
and
· Support related uses in the TRC area
2. Estimate levels of visitor activity generated by the theater complex and
requirements for the infrastructure and other activities needed to support that
Mr. Ronald Bradley
Page 3
activity (parking, traffic flow, site size and location requirements and destination
marketing).
3. Estimate the level or range of economic and fiscal .impacts generated by the
proposed development.
These are the objectives of the market and financial analysis described as the
proposed "Seopo of Services."
Scope of Services
The work program designed to determine the sufficient scale of development and its
support requirements is divided into two phases each of which is preceded by a work
session and concluded with a written and verbal report. The purlxme of Phase I is to
define the size of theater development which could be supported from the existing
level of non-resident visitors to Temecula. Phase II will evaluate the reasonableness
of, and requirements for, increasing the level of visitation to Temecula. The purpose
of the three work sessions pre. eeding/following each phase is to budget the time (and
recognize the necessity of) convening the Price Waterhouse economic study team with
the developer/manager and client to:
1. Refine and clarify objectives and requirements of the Specific Plan, City,
Developer and the proposed enterprise: the theater complex.
2. Communicate and evaluate study methodology, reliability and findings.
3. Insure that the timely progress and quality of the study, desired by all three
participants (client, developer, and Price Waterhouse) is obtained.
Phase III will estimate the fiscal (new taxes) and economic impacts generated for the
city and county by the new development.
The work plan, time and budget requirements and scheduled communications with the
developer and client are outlined in the following sections.
Mr. Ronald Bradley
Page 4
Phase I: Theater Development Supported by Existin$ Visitor Market
Following Work Session one, a series of analytical tasks will be undertaken to quantify
the existing source of non-resident visitor market and visitor characteristics. Each
visitor market segment will be quantified in terms of:
Primary Market:
Secondary Market:
Tertiary Market:
1 to 11/2 hour drive time - "Day Trippen"
6 to 8 hour drive time - "Overnighters"
Beyond 8 hour drive time - "Vacationers"
Characteristics of visitors will be evaluated in terms of:
Purpose or primary attraction:
· Mode of transportation
· Average length of stay
· Seasonality
· Average party size
· Peak time characteristics
· Spending per person
· Adult - child mix
special event, specialty retail, etc.
Based on the assessment of visitor attendance levels to Temecula, we will evaluate the
scale of theater development which can be supported. This evaluation will be defined
in terms of:
· Types of theaters
· Number of seam/type of theater
· Show content/style/quality
The report will contain a description of the research findings and sufficient statistical
data to support our major conclusions. Approximately one week following delivery of
the Phase One report a work session will be conducted to further discuss existing
visitor market characteristics and our Phase I findings.
Phase II.'
Market and Site Requirements to Sustain Proposed Theater
Complex
Each of the visitor market segments identified in Phase I will be analyzed to determine
Temecula's ability to increase its annual level of visitation, improve market penetration
rates and destination marketing program (budget) needed to capture increased
Mr. Ronald Bradley
Page 5
visitation. The viability of the proposed theater development complex will be
evaluated in terms of its sustainability from increased visitation. Based on this
evaluation, we will then describe absorption pace, phasing or buildout period for the
proposed dev.elopment.
The second part of the Phase II work program will include a description of the
relevant physical requirements and characteristics (site location, site area, perking and
circulation) which determine the marketability of the complex.
Phase III.' Economic Impacts of the Entertainment Complex and Fiscal
Impacts Resultin,, From "New" Spendin,,
Annual or recurring economic impeets generated from operations of the proposed
entertainment complex results from "new" dollars spent-by non-resident attendees.
Additionally, spending by area residents which no longer "leaks" from the local
economy due to events being held in Temeeula also represents "new" dollars.
Combined, this new spending generates income and jobs for local area residents and
new sales revenue for local businesses.
In this task, we will estimate total "new" dollars resulting from the entertainment
facility operations. Spending estimates will be based on financial operating data and
average spending per attendee. Estimated "new" dollars will be used to determine
total impects through the use of an econometric model which will calculate total
impacts from subsequent spending "rounds" within Riverside County. Economic
impects will be expressed in terms of changes in sales volume, income and number of
jobs created.
Data describing the economic impacts (total sales, jobs and income) will be utilized to
measure the estimated fiscal impacts or increases in local taxes. The two to three
largest tax revenue impects (e.g. hotel, sales, etc.) will be estimated.
A final report describing all Phase I, Phase II and Phase III findings and methodology
will be submitted one week prior to the final work session.
Mr. Ronald Bradley
Page 6
Price Waterhouse Qualifications and Experience
Price Waterhouse began its U.S. operations in 1889 and today employs 10,000
professional and technical staff in 100 offices throughout the United States. Annual
revenues for the U.S. Firm exceed $1.3 billion. The Price Waterhouse World Firm is
located in 111 countries in 448 offices, with annual revenues in excess of $3.6 billion.
The firm's goal is to serve clients whose primary needs are:
· Credibility and objectivity
· Client service
· Wordwide reputation .
Fortune 500 executives were recently asked to rank the Big 6 accounting firms in
various categories. On a scale of 1-10, survey participants ranked Price Waterhouse
highest in ethics; Price Waterhouse's score of 8.5 was the highest individual firm score
in any category.
Client service is the cornerstone of Price Waterhouse's overall business strategy. It is
what we are all about and the way in which we distinguish ourselves among
professional services firms. Our "Client Bill of Rights" reflects our commitment to
superior client services. Our internal client service initiatives include programs to
define, enhance, recognize and reward client service to ensure that our services are
perceived as the best in the marketplace.
As clients you have the right to:
· Professional Excellence
· Be Serviced by Professionals Who Understand Your Business
· Proactive Advice and Creative Business Ideas
· Independent Viewpoints and Perspectives
· Effective Communication
· Wide Range of Professionals Resources
· Dependable Service
· Service Anytime and Anyplace
· State-of-the-Art Technology
· Value-Added Service
Mr. Ronald Bradley
Page 7
Price Waterhouse is the sixth largest accounting tim, however, it leads the Fortune
100, Forbes 100 Largest Multinati0nals (29% market share) and Dow Jones Industrials
(47% market share) in number of clients. Regarding combined sales of elieats, Price
Waterhouse ranks first with $671 billion, representing 26% of total sales among the
Fortune 500. No Big 6 firm is more strategically focused on and organized to serve
multinational companies than Price Waterhouse.
Price Waterhouse ensures the continuity of its reputation through its program of
recruiting the Best and Brightat. The results of this program are borne out by
objective measures. As noted in a survey published in the trade magazine,
Professional Services Review, "a greater percentage of [PW] hires are the top students
from the top schools than any other tim."
The ~rm's achievements for quality work have been recognized by its peers. In 1990,
Price Waterhouse achieved an unprecedented accomplishment: We were then and
remain today the first and only national firm to have undergone a peer review resulting
in an unqualified opinion and no letter of comment. Hailed as a "historic" event by a
member of the profession's Public Oversight Board, this landmark accomplishment set
up apart as the quality firm and demonstrated our commitment to the highest
standards of professional excellence.
In 1993, history repeated itself. As in 1990, our 1993 peer review, conducted by
Deloitte & Touche, has once again resulted in a clean opinion with no letter of
comment. It is particularly rewarding to have the ~rm's impressive performance
acknowledged by our peers-not once, but twice. We take pride in this achievement,
and, at the same time, recognize the need to intensify our efforts to ensure that we
maintain this standing.
Among the rim's clients are major multinational rims, including:
* Alcan Aluminum
· Amoco
· Bausch and Lomb
· Bristol Meyers
· Chevron
· Eastman Kodak
· E.I. du Pont de Neroours
· Exxon
· F.W. Woolworth
· Goodyoar Tire and Rubber
· Hewlett-Packard
· IBM
· MCI Communications
· Scott Paper
· Seagram
· Shell Oil
· The Walt Disney Company
· W.R. Grace
Mr. Ronald Bradley
Page 8
The Price Waterhome Development Advisory Group is devoted exclusively to the
economic analysis of leisure facility development and operations and specializes in:
Market Demand Utilization and Studies
Development Strategies and Planning
Management Operations and Analysis
Financing and Funding Plans
Expansion Planning and Building Programs
Studies conducted by Price Waterhouse are unique because of our:
· Track record of quality, credibility and objectivity
· Staff experience in public assembly facility development and operations
analysis
· Continuous Project Director involvement
Our professional suppert and participation in the leisure facilities industry includes:
Stadium and Arena Managers Annual Report: The Development Advisory Group
surveys all North American major league venues and summarizes results to report
annually on occupancy, operating costs, attendance, operating trends and
management issues.
Amphitheater Report: The Development Advisory Group surveys all outdoor
amphitheaters in major U.S. market areas and report summarized results annually
on number of events, attendance, attendee spending, operating costs and
management concerns.
Convention Center Annual Report: We survey every primary convention
center with over 100,000 square feet of exhibit space and approximately 50
smaller facilities throughout the United States and Canada. We report annual
convention and trade show average occupancy, attendance, food and beverage
per capita sales and effective rental rates.
International Congress Center Annual Report: We have been selected to
conduct the annual survey of member facilities for an international association
of congress centers. This information is presented by geographical location
and size of all major centers and includes attendance, food and beverage
sales, occupancy, rental revenue and exhibition space occupancy.'
Mr. Ronald Bradley
Page 9
Data Base and Building Files: We maintain current records on building floor
plans, financial data and city information for nearly every major facility in
North America.
Professional Conferences and Seminars: Our staff address five to ten
professional associations annually on subjects associated with planning,
development and operation of public assembly facilities. These groups
include International City Managers Association, International Association of
Auditorium Managers, International Convention Center Conference,
Association Internationale des Palais de Congres, the Urban Land Institute,
Japan National Tourist Organization and others. The active involvement of
our staff in the activities of these organizations keeps us abreast of industry
trends, facility development and related information.
Publications and Research: The results of our research and analysis are
frequently published in such journals as Urban Land; Convene; Amusement
Business; Conferences, Exhibitions & Incentives; Tradeshow Week; Facility
Manager and Practicing Planner. Staff members have also been quoted in
numerous magazines and newspapers such as the New York Times, Wall Street
Journal and Washington Post. David C. Petersen authored a book, published
by the Urban Land Institute, entitled Convention Centers, Stadiums and
Arenas.
The activities and resources of the Development Advisory Group evidence our
commitment to improved leisure facility development and operation.
Firm Qualifications
Daytona Beach, '"lake Part II"
Daytona Beach, Florida
Mr. George Mirabal
President, Chamber of Commerce
(904) 255-0981
Price Waterhouse staff analyzed tourist visitation trends in Daytona Beach and
competitive markets. The analysis resulted in development of a strategic action
program for potential tourist attraction development near Daytona Beach.
Mr. Ronald Bradley
Page 10
Grand Cypress Resort
Orlando, Florida
Price Waterhouse staff performed a series of market and financial analyses in
conjunction with strategic planning for goff course facilities and golf oriented
rental resort villas.
Lexington Downtown Development Commission
Lexington, Kentucky
Mr. Thomas Minter
President, Lexington Center
(606) 233-4567
Analyzed development trends and potentials in downtown Lexington, including
detailed evaluation of demand for commercial office, retail, food and beverage,
hotel and miscellaneous urban uses in the downtown area. Projections served as
basis for development of policies for the Lexington Downtown Development
Commission and successful development of Lexington Center Corporation, a
mixed-use retail, hotel and public assembly facility.
City of Virginia Beach
Virginia Beach, Virginia
m. Mark Wawner
Contract Administrator
(804) 430-4567
Performed a market and financial assessment for a proposed 16,000-t8,000 seat
amphitheater to attract summer concerts to the Virginia Beach area. The tasks in
this study included:
- Market area overview
- Competitive and comparable facilities analysis
- User surveys
- Building program recommendations
- Estimated utilization
- Financial operations analysis
- Development cost analysis
- Economic and fiscal impact analysis
- Alternative funding and development scenarios
- Site analysis
Mr. Ronald Bradley
Page 11
Convention and Visitors Bureau
Arlington, Texas
Mr. Charles R. Kiefer
Deputy City Manager
(817) 459-6106
Examined advantages and disadvantages d alternative management structures for
the City of Arlington. Identified and selected cities of comparable size with
similar demographic and financial characteristics. Evaluated form of organization,
board of directors composition and authority, funding characteristics and
perceived advantages and disadvantages of the various organizational forms.
Evaluated Arlington's CVB performance and recommended methods to improve
operations.
Tearrt ResBrrte$
Resumes for the following staff are included in the "Resume" section.
· David C. Petersen, Managing Director
· David Allsteadt, Practice Manager
· Nancy L Vegas, Senior Consultant
· Mike Bilodeau, Senior Consultant
Time and Budget Requirements
The proposed scope d services will be provided for a fixed fee d $75,000, plus travel
expenses for the three planned work sessions. This fee will be payable according to
the following schedule.
$25,060
15,000
15,000
10,000
10,000
Due upon authorization to proceed
* Due four weeks following authorization to proceed
* Due upon delivery d Phase I draft report
* Due upon delivery of Phase II draft report
* Due upon delivery of Phase Ill draft report
875.000 * Total fee plus travel costs.
* Plus travel costs
Mr. Ronald Bradley
Page 12
Engagement Terms
Our services will not include ascertaining the legal and regulatory requirements
applicable to the proposed project, including zoning, other state and local government
regulations, permits and licenses. Further, no effort will be made to determine the
possible effect on this project of future energy shortages or prosent or future federal,
state or local legislation, including any bond restrictions, environmental or ecological
matters, interpretations thereof or subsurface conditions. Our report will contain a
statement to that effect.
Estimates of future financial operations will be based on ~he proposed work program,
estimates and assumptions from previous studies, information developed from
supplemental research, knowledge of the industry and other sources, including certain
information that you will provide. These sources of information and bases of
significant estimates and assumptions will be stated in our report. Some assumptions
inevitably will not materialize and unantieipated events and circumstances may occur;
therefore, actual results achieved will vary from the estimates, and the variations may
be material. Our report will contain a statement to that effect.
Further, we will neither evaluate management's effectiveness nor be responsible for
future marketing efforts and other management actions upon which actual results will
depend, and we will so state in our report.
The terms of this engagement will be such that we will have no obligation to revise the
report to reflect events or conditions which occur subsequent to the date of the report.
However, we will be available to discuss the necessity for revision in view of changes
in the economic or market factors affecting the project. Our report will contain a
statement to that effect.
Report and analysis of future financial performance included therein, are intended for
the information of the person or persons to whom they are addressed, solely for the
purposes stated therein and should not be relied upon for any other purpose.
Neither our report nor its contents, nor any reference to Price Waterhouse may be
included or quoted in any offering circular or registration statement, prospectus, sales
brochure, appraisal, loan or other agreement or documentation without prior written
consent.
Mr. Ronald Bradley
Page 13
Price Waterhouse does not, as pan of its economic and financial analysis, perform an
audit, review or examination (as defined by the AICPA) of any of the historical or
future estimated financial information, and therefore does not express any opinion with
regard to same.
Authorization to Proceed
If the proposed scope of services described in this letter meets with your approval, you
may authorize us to proceed by signing one copy of this document and returning it to
us. This proposal will remain in force for a period of sixty (60) days. Should you
have questions, please contact David Petersen at (813) 222-5406.
We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposal and look forward to workinl~
with you on this engagement.
Very truly yours,
David C. Petersen
DCP/ksw
Authorization to proceed:
Name and Title Date
DAVID C. PETERSEN Director
David C. Petersen is the Director of the Sports and Convention Facilities Advisory Group for Price Waterhouse.
This is a national and international practice providing assistance to local and state governments, authorities,
franchise owners, corporations end financial institutions. Services provided include:
Market Demand end Utilization Studies
Development Strategies end Planning
Finencing end Funding Plans
Menagement and Operations Analysis
Expansion Plenning end Building Program
Economic Impact Analysis
Upon receiving a B.A. degree, with honors in economics from San Jose State College, Mr. Petersen provided
consulting services in municipal financial planning, central city revitalization strategies end sports end convention
facilities development end operations. Mr. Petersen's assignments have included studies for existing and
proposed centers such es:
· New Orleans Superdome
· Jacob Javits Convention Center (New
York City)
· RFK 'Redskins' Stadium (Washington)
· Hynes Convention Center (Boston)
· Georgia Dome Stadium (Atlanta)
· Washington State Convention Ctr. (Seretie)
· Rupp Arena (Lexington, KY)
· Bradley Arena (Milwaukee)
· Chicago 'White Sox' Stadium
· Baltimore 'Orioles' Stadium
· San Diego Convention Center
· Ocean Center (Daytona Beach)
· Rose Bowl Stadium
· N~-~qu Coliseum (Arena) New York
· Boston Gardens Arena
· Milwaukee 'Brewers" Stadium
· Sen Frandsco 'Giants' Stadium
· Anaheim Arena (California)
· Phoenix 'Suns" An1:}hitheater Arena
· Miami Beach Converttion Center
· Indienapolis Convention Center and Hoosier
Dome
· St. Louis Convention Center, Auditorium
and Dome Stadium
· Atlentic City Convention Center
Mr. Petersen has also served clients in Italy, Japan, Singapore, United Kingdom, Curacao and the Philippines.
Mr. Petersen's articles have been published in Conferences Exhibitions & Incentives International, Amusement
Business, Convene, Practicing Planner, Urban Land and Tradeshow Week. He is the author of the book,
Convention Centers, Stadiums, and Arenas, published by the Urban Land Institute. He has addressed the
International City Managers Association, Japanese National Tourist Organization, International Convention Center
Conference, Urban Land Institute, International Associmion of Auditorium Managers, Stadium Menager Annual
Seminar, Society of American Business Editors and Writers, Association Internationale des Paiais de Congres
and the annual Meeting World Conference. In 1989, he was admitted as full member of the Urban Land
Institute.
l 'ice Haterhouse
MICHAEL C. BILODEAU Senior Consultant
Michael C. Bilodeau's background includes public assembly facility analysis and sports facility operations. His
professional experience includes assignments in market and financial analysis lor a diverse group of public and
private clients.
Mr. Bilodeau has been involved in a variety of research projects throughout the United States, including
convention/exhibition, entertainment and sporting facilities. Recent projects on which he has sewed as the
primary consultant include:
Capital Centre (Land0ver, Maryland) - Appraisal evaluation of NBA/NHL arena to determine facility's
market value.
· Georgia Dome (Atlanta, Georgia) - Market and financial evaluation for 70, O(X) seat NFL dome stadium.
· Olympic Palace (San Juan, Puerto Rico) - Markat and financial evaluation for proposed Olympic arena,
Rose Bowl (Pasadena, CalHornia) - Market evaluation and finandal analysis associated with
development of premium seating areas (sky boxes and dub seats) at Rose Bowl Stadium.
Joe Robbie Stadium (Miami, Florida) - Valuation of Joe Robhie Stadium. Clienrs objective
was to determine facility's incremental value following Major League Baseball expansion.
Rangers Stadium (Arlington, Texas) - Valuation of new Arlington Stadium and Texas Rangers
to determine the incremental value of the baseball franchise following the team's relocation
to their new stadium.
Lynn, Massachusetts - Analysis of market support. financial evaluation, economic and fiscal impact
analysis and development funding plan for proposed New England Patriots' dome stadium.
Lubbock, Texas - Analysis of market support, financial evaluation and economic impact
analysis associated with development of proposed Coliseum and Lubbock CMc Center
expansion.
Louisiana Superdome (Now Orleans, Louisiana) - Analysis of additional exhibitioWconvention
demand to determine future development opportunities for a new exhibition facility adjacent
to the Superdome.
San Bernardioe, California - Market suppert evaluation and estimate of utilization for a new 18,000-
seat outdoor amphitheater.
Spokane, Washington - Market evaluation, financial analysis, site selection and economic
impact evaluation for a proposed arena.
Pensacola, Fbrida - Development planning and market evaluation for a proposed Minor
League Baseball stadium.
Mr. Bilodeau received a Bachelor's degree, with honors in finance, from Northeast Louisiana University, and
a Master of Arts degree in sport administration from Ohio State University.
Price Ifizterhoust, e
DAVID P. ALLSTEADT
Manager
David AIIsteadt joined Price Waterhouse in 1987 after completing his CPA examination. He has six years of
experience dealing primarily with financial services and real estate. Mr. AIIsteadt joined the Sports and
Convention Facilities Advisory Group in 1993. His recent projects as Practice Manager include:
Starelord, Connecticul - Evaluation of developer prepared market analysis and incremental revenues and
taxes for proposed super-regional shopping center expansion.
· Central Connectice - Analysis of financial and operating estimates for music theater.
Montgomery County, Maryland - Market evaluation, financial analysis, site selection, building program
evaluation and economic impact for proposed high technology convention center.
Waterbury, Connecticut - Analysis of developer prepared market analysis and incremental revenues and
taxes for proposed new super-regional shopping center.
Hartford, Connecticut - Evaluation of developer prepared financial and operating estimates for a downtown
amphitheater.
Boston, Massachusetts - Analysis of alternative development options of multi-purpose center including,
dedicated exhibit space and integral fixed seating space.
· Saint Paul, Minnesota- Analysis of competitive developer proposals for a riverfront amphitheater.
Spokane, Washington - Market evaluation, financial analysis, and economic impact of proposed convention
center expansion.
· Mexico City, Mexico - Competitive facilities analysis for proposed convention center near the airport.
First Florida Banks (FFB) - Financial audits concerning credit review, including evaluating adequacy of
allowance for loan losses. Loans reviewed included real estate related loans: single-family, multi-family,
and commercial property.
Walter Industries, Inc. -Invoivemant in three collateralized mortgage obligation financing deals for the
Homebuilding Group. The Homebuilding Group builds and finances approximately 5,000 single-family
units per year.
Resolution Trust Corporation - Quality Control review of Due Diligence Contractors involved in a RTC
Accelerated Resolution Program project. Settlement Jackets account balances. Due diligence of
undeveloped and partially developed land loans for inclusion in securitized land fund pools.
· Criterion Development Corporation - Preparation of prospective financial information for limited
partnerships involved in bond refinancing related to low income housing apartment complexes.
Mr. AIIsteadt received a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from the University of South Florida.
He is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and of the Florida Institute of Certified
Public Accountants.
NANCY L. VEGAS Senior Consultant
Nancy Vegas' background includes hotel and convention center analysis and operations. Her professional
experience includes markel, financial and economio impact analysis and building program recommendations
for several IxXal and convention oemer development projects. Ms. Vegas has been involved in several research
assignments monitoring holel room occupancy and average room rates in various hotel markets throughout
the United Sties. She also senms as project director for the Price Waterhouse Convention Center Annual
Report surveys. Descriptions of projects on which she served as prirnaW consultam include:
Boston, Mm0huselt$ - Analysis of alternmive exhibition space expansion options. Alternative development
options included expansion of Hynes Convention Center, development of an exhibition facility in South
Boston, or both.
Atlants, Georgia - Market, financial and economic impact analysis for proposed expansion of Georgia World
Congress Cemer.
Houslon, Tens - Analysis of the effect of site location on the marketability of a proposed headquarters hotel
for the George R. Brown Convention Center.
San Diego, CalUomin - Markel, financiaJ and economic impact analysis for proposed San Diego
Convention Canter expansion. Opportunities to improve the existing building program were identified.
Detroil, Michigan - Estimate of room night demand from Cobo Conference and Exposition Center in
downtown Detroit.
Analtalm, California - Business plan which estirnmed Anaheim Convention Centers lutum space
requirements and off-site facilities assodated with building expansion.
Brownnille, Texas - Markel and financial analysis of a proposed multi-purpose building to accommodate
conventions, trade shows, spectator events, and local functions.
· Yuma, Arizona - Markel analysis for the expansion of Yuma's community 'went' center.
· El Paso, Texas - Analysis of markel demand to delermine future markel support for a headquarters
hotel located adjacent to El Paso Convention Center.
Performing Arts Pavilions - Market and financial analysis for fifteen to twenty proposed pedorming
arts pavilions.
United Slate - Researched how five of the most recently developed convention center headquarter
hotels were financed, and effect of these hotels on convention center occupancy and citywide room
night demand.
New Odeanl, Louisiana - Site, market and financial analysis for a proposed lodging property to be
located near a proposed exhibit hall adjacent to the Superdome. Recommended lodging property
type to best suit area demand.
Orlando, Florida - Markel and financial analysis for proposed upscale resort and conference center.
Sarasot'a, Florida - Analysis ot market demand associated with development of beach-front resort
hotel property.
Prior to joining Price Waterhome, Ms. Veges served in sales and marketing positions with Hilton Internmional
Hotel's national sales offices in New York and Minneapolis. Ms. Vegas received a Bachelor of Science degree
in hotel administration from Cornell University.
l~ict, l J~tt,r'htm.~'e e
PRICE WATERHOUSE DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY SERVICES -'-'
The Price Waterhouse DevelopmeM Advisory Services is devoted exclusively to the economic analysis of public assembly facility
development and operations and specializes in:
· Market Demand end Utilization Studies
· Development Strategies and Planning
· Management Operations and Analysis
· Financing and Funding Plens
· Expansion Plenning end Building Programs
· ' Site Evaluation and Runking
· Facility Valuations
· Acquisition 'Due Diligence'
Studies conducted by Price Waterhouse are unique because of our:
· Track record of qlality, credib|lity and oNecUvny
· Extensive experience in public assembly facility development and operntioos analysis
· Continuous project director involvement
Our professional support end participation in the assembly and meeting facilities industry includes:
· Annual Arena and Stadium Managers' Reped - Price Waterhouse surveys all North American major league venues and
summarizes the results to report annually on occupancy, operating costs, attendance, operating trends and management
issues.
· Diversity d Experience for Seccesdul Clients - Our staff has provided economic and financial planning services to owners
of convention centers, arenas, domed stadiums, amphitheaters, motor speedways, horse racetracks, ice arenas and minor
league stadiums. A sample of the facilities we have assisted with planning or expansion include the Georgia Dome in
Atlanta, Baltimore Orioles Stadium, White Sox Stadium, the Rose Bowl, the Superdome, Rupp Arena in Lexington (KY),
American West Arena in Phoenix, and Ocean Center in Daytona Beach.
· Decades ol Industry Experience - Price Waterhouse has been associated with the entertainment and sports industries for
over 60 years. Our clients include 18 professional sports franchises representing Major League Baseball, the National
Football League, National Basketball Association and National Hockey League. The firm is also actively involved in serving
event producers, minor league team owners, facility management companies, motor speedways, yachting industry and
golf associations.
· International Congress Center Annual Repefl - Price Waterhouse has been selected to conduct the annual survey of member
facilities for an international association of congress centers. This information is presented by geographical location and
size of all major centers and includes attendance, food and beverage sales, occupancy, rental revenue and exhibition
space occupancy.
· Convention Center Anneal Report - Price Waterhouse surveys every primary convention center with over 100,000 square
feet of exhibit space and approximately 50 smaller facilities throughout the United States and Canada. We report ennual
convention and trade show average occupancy, attendance, food and beverage per capita sales and effective rental rates.
· Data Base and Building Files - We maintain current records on building floor plans, financial data and city information for
many major facilities in North America.
· Predictin Attendance Model - We have developed a model to estimate attendance for sports franchises new to a metro
area. The model is based on key measures of a community's Iocational characteristics, proposed team performance and
team quality. The model has been tested for major league football, basebell, hockey, basketball and soccer.
· Prdessional Conferences and Seminars - Our staff address five to ten professional associations ennually on subjects
associated with planning, development end operation of public assembly facilities. These groups include the Annual
Stadium Managers Seminar, International City Manager Association's Sports & Events Management Conference,
International Association of Auditorium Managers, International Convention Center Conference, Association Internationale
des Palate de Congres, the Urban Land Institute's Sports Facilities Seminar, Japen National Tourist Organization and
others. The active involvement of our staff in the activities of these organizations keeps us abreast of industry trends,
facility development and related information.
· Publications and Research - The results of our research and analysis are frequently published in such journals as Facility
Manager; Conferences, Exhibitions & Incentives; Urban Land; Amusement Business; Convene; Practicing Planner and
Tradeshow Week. Staff members have also been quoted in numerous magazines end newspapers such as the New York
Times, Waft Street Journal end Washington Post. David C. Petersen authored a book, published by the Urban Land
Institute, entitled Convention Centers, Stadiums and Arenas.
The activities and resources of the Sports, Convention, and Entertalnmant Facilities Advisory Group evidence our commitment
to improved spectator sports, entertainment end assembly facility development and operation.
Thinking About a Downtown
Stadium for Baltimore
·
Dsvid C. Pek., ~ ~
When the owner of the
Baltimore Orioles
baseball team announced
in 1984 that he would not renew
his lease for Memorial Stadium.
the business community and gov-
ernmental leaders responded with
a focused program of action un-
equaled in any other American
city in the same circumstances. A
plan for a new' stadium was quick-
1~ proposed by the Downtown
Task Force and subsequently
taken up for further study and
consideration by a state-level com-
mission. This commission's find-
ings and recommend.ations led the
Man'land State Legislature to
form the Maryland Stadium Au-
thority with funding to build not
only a new baseball park but a
new football stadium as well.
Baltimore. having already lost
one major league team. the NFL
Colts. knew too well the damage
to the local economy and civic
pride that the loss of the Orioles
would bring. Unlike "glamour"
cities like New York and San
Francisco. Baltimore relies on pro
sports teams for national recogni-
tion. publicliT,'. and image. Since
1959. Baltimore civic and business
leaders have directed an urban re-
newal and central city revitaliza-
tion program that has progressed.
virtually uninterrupted. under the
administrations of six different
mayors. The city that built
Charles Center and Inner Harbor
was not about to lose its "major
league" status.
On April 26. 1988. ULI's Balti-
more District Council sponsored a
program focusing on the experi-
ences of other cities with down-
town stadiums as well as on Bahi-
more's plan for a new bailpark.
Riverfront Stadium in Cincin-
nati, As explained by Nell Surber,
director of economic development
for the city of Cincinnati, this 20-
year-old structure. home to the
NFL Bengals and the Cincinnati
Reds. sits between the Ohio River
and downtown. A pedestrian
walkway over Interstate Highway
71 connects the stadium to the
CBD.
A stadium typicalP,' depends on
automobile transportation to de-
liver its fans on game day. With
few exceptions {for example. at
New York's Yankee StadiumL sea-
son ticket holders are not likely
users of public transportation.
Nor can most public transporta-
tion systems deliver 60,000 to
70,000 fans to a stadium comfort-
ably and safely. Consequently. a
fan-to-car ratio of 3:1 requires
parking for 3,000 to 4.000 cars for
an average major league baseball
team and as many as 20,000 park-
ing spaces for an NFL team. Be-
cause downtown Cincinnati al-
ready offered thousands of
parking spaces in ganges and off-
street lots (available for night and
weekend games), the site area re-
quired for the stadium was re-
duced by over 100 acres. Thus, re-
duced parking requirements
saved money for the city, and the
flow of fans through the CBD
brought economic benefits.
Traditionally, the high cost of
parking Ms been a deterrent to
downtown office development in
Cincinnati. Riverfront Stadium
developed 4,500 parking spaces
on site. which downtown workers
can use for $20 per month. (CBD
monthly parking rates can reach
$100.) Multiuse stadium parking
is part of the citv's continuing
effort to strengthen the CBD.
Most NFL season ticket holders.
as has been well documented. are
upper-middle-income subur-
banires. Bengals games draw fans
into downtown on weekends. fans
who tend to use its tirst-class retail
facilities and five-star restaurants.
The Reds baseball games attract
fans from a five-state area, and
thus a substantial number of over-
night visitors who stay in the citv's
nearby first-class hotels. Sun'evs
have documented the importance
of sports events at Riverfront Sta-
dium to CBD retail sales as well.
A 17,500-seat arena. the
· 'Coliseum," now sits adjacent to
the stadium. h shares the sta-
dium's parking facilities and also
relies on CBD parking facilities.
An agreement between the man-
agement of the Coliseum and Riv-
erfront Stadium prohibits the
scheduling of simultaneous activi-
ties at both locales to avoid over-
burdening parking capacity.
Riverfront Stadium was fi-
nanced through an agreement be-
tween the city, which owned the
land, and Hamilton County,
which possessed the bonding ca-
pacity that the city was lacking.
Such city/county coo ration is
often sought but sel~reomn achieved.
New 0rlemms Superdome. Ed
Nebel, a professor of hotel/restau-
rant/tourism studies at the Uni-
versity of New Orleans, told the
ULI audience that a 300 percent
construction overrun was just the
beginning of the bad news for the
Superdome. The New Orleans
downtown area sprawls in com-
September 88 21
panson to Cincinnati. Although
downtown office worke/'s do use
the 5.000 parking spaces available
at the Superdome site, downtown
and tourist-oriented French
Quarter retailers do not benefit to
the same extent as their counter-
pans in Cincinnati.
The initial operating plan and
economic justification for the Su-
perdome were predicated on a
major league baseball team mak-
ing its home there. This never
happened. Cincinnatrs Riverfront
Stadium hosts 80 baseball games
each year that New Orleans does
not enjoy. Also. "the Dome" was
expected to function as a conven-
tion center. but. like baseball. this
function never materialized. (In
1984. a new convention center
was built several blocks awav.i Op-
erating deficits in the early years
of stadium operations exceeded
several million dollars annually.
Since 1978. a private management
company has achieved significant
reductions in operating costs.
Most recenth', the Dome was
forced to enter into a "sweetheart"
contract with the NFL Saints to
retain the team. After losing an
NBA franchise to Salt Lake City.
New Orleans was anxious to keep
its one remaining major league
tenant.
Predevelopment market studies
proved to be as misleading as
postdevelopment economic ira-
pact studies were disappointing.
Someday. the market mav support
more teams. Someday. the CBD
may grow closer to the stadium. It
is unlikely. however. that this sta-
dium will ever successfully double
as a convention center. It is also
unlikely that its annual debt ser-
vice costs and operating expenses
will ever be offset by property tax
revenues attributable to the sta-
dium's positive effect on property
values or by direct stadium
income.
Indianapolis Hoosierdome.
Dean Phillips, executive director
and general manager of the Indi-
anapolis Convention Center and
Hoosierdome. reported that this
domed stadium was built as an in-
tegral part of the convention cen-
ter. The stadium playing surface
provides a 150.000-square-foot
extension to the exhibition hall
for major trade and consumer .
shows. Financing for the stadium
was provided through a $:30 mil-
lion grant from the Eli Lilly Foun-
dation. as well as through an addi-
tional S35 million from a
municipal bond sale. ¢The bonds
are to be repaid from a I percent
tax on food and beverages sold in.
restaurants and other commercial
establishments.)
Building a stadium without a
tenant was a high-risk venture.
but luckily Indianapolis was able
to attract the NFL Colts to the city
The economic jumificmioa for the New Orleans Superdome was predicmed on · major
league baM4all team making iU home ,here, something that never happened.
by the time the stadium opened.
Like the Superdome. the Hoosier-
dome has no major league base-
ball team. Unlike the Superdome.
it enjoys the economic advantages
of dual use as convention space.
The stadium and convention cen-
ter share management. staff. and
parking facilities. This factor. to-
gether with grant financing. keeps
the Hoosierdome's debt service
and operating costs substantiall~
below those for the Superdome.
The complex has spawned major
projects on nearby parcels. and
has helped make Indianapolis a
major center for amateur and
professional sports. giving it na-
tional stature.
Without its convention center,
special sports activities. the
sierdome probably would not at-
tract much development to tts
surroundings. Twenty events a
vear--I 0 pro football games and
i 0 concerts--will not provide suf-
ficient support for restaurants.
shops. and the like. These estab-
lishments need market support
from a surrounding office and
resident population. Stadium
events are simply. though deft-
nitely. a market enhancement.
Baltimore's Thinldng
As Herb Belgrad. chairman ot
the Maryland Stadium Authority.
described the situation. foilowm.~
the announcement by Orioles
owner and famed attorney. the
late Edward Bennett Willtams.
that he would not renew the
team's lease at Memorial Stadium.
the citv's mayor. Donald Schaef-
fer. charged the Downtown Task
Force with the responsibility for
identifying and evaluating the
city's options. This task force. in
turn. retained stadium architects
Hellmuth. Obata and Kassabaum
(HOK) and sports facility econom-
ic consultants Laventhol & Hor-
wath (L&H). During the course of
its study. the HOK/L&H team
evaluated the costs and benefits of
renovating Memorial Stadium
venus building a new stadium--
open or enclosed. single- or multi-
22 September 88 / _TIT<
purpose tbasebail and football
combinedl. It Investigated and
ranked manx alternative she loca-
tions according to their accessibili-
Ix. available site area. site acquisi-
tion issues. the economic impact
ot stadium operations on city and
state finances. available parking.
and attendance. Several of these
sites were near the Inner Harbor
and CBD. while others were near
the Baltimore-~,Vashington Inter-
nattcmal Airport tBWI I and closer
to the Washinl~ton. D.C.. area.
The team discovered an inter-
esting economic trade-off. Ciearh.
the economic,fiscal benefits to the
state would be greater were the
stadium located closer to the
XVashington. D.(i.. metropolitan
area. where increased attendance
trom out-ol-state residents would
generate higher "nel next"' spend-
in~ within the state. But such a
catam x~ould erode the team's his-
toric tan base. which lived in lhe
citx ot Bahimore. Furthermore.
the D.(:.'Northern Virginia tan
base would he weakened ~ere
VCashington. D.(2.. to obtain a ma-
ior league tranchise of its own.
Tratfit als~ would be a tou~h
sue at sites hK'aled in the Bahi-
nlore-D.( ]. t.rridor.
A Male ct~mmlssi~nI ajso illvestj-
gated sites th,ser ~ the ~A'ashitlg-
~,m. I).(;.. area. bin ultimately the
',telIt' srlec'led the site retonl-
mended bx the HC)K L&H slud~
al (~amden Yards adjacent to the
Belhimore CBD. ~.Vithin half a
mile ot this she there are two Bal-
timore subwax stops. 20 bus stops.
maior lourist hotels. the ]0.(lOll-
seat Civic Cenler. the Bahimore
Convention Center. and 12.000
off-street parking spaces.
The state has proposed financ-
ing the stadium with proceeds
from a series of instant lotteries
(the first two sports-themed loi-
reties have raised $16 million ).
tax increment funds. and net
revenues from the stadium's
operation.
According to Randall Evans.
who represented the state's De-
partment of Communitx' and Eco-
nomic Development. the issues
are simple: taxes and jobs. Not all
a stadium's benefits are direct. or
directIx obvious. One key value it
bnngs ts in the national media
coverage provided b~' major
league sports..Another is that it
enhances the quality of life need-
ed to attract residents and busi-
nesses to Baltimore.
The president of Charles Cen-
ter-Inner Harbor Management.
Inc.. Albert Copp. thinks the sta-
dium project will help perpetuate
the momentum of downtown re-
development. As the few remain-
ing parcels for office buildings
and hotels have had to wait for
further growth in the market for
their development. interest in the
Inner Harbor area has begun to
wane. Construction of the stadium
will enhance the area's image as
the "place to be."
The proposed Oriole stadium is
not without its detractors. The
· 'opl:x~sttRm's" leading spokesman.
Robert J..Stohe. president of the
.Southwest Bahinlore Communitx
Council. served as a panelist at the
L'LI District Council meeting.
Representin.~ the neightx~rh~nd
adiacent Io the proposed stadium
stle. the community council has
not sought Io prevent the devel-
opment on Camden Yards. but
has asked the citx and state to mit-
tgale the potential negative effects
of the stadium on its neighlx~r-
h~n~d. Such negative impacts m-
elude the delax in construction of
two badIx' needed bridges: traffic
congestion on hn:al streets: the
loss of a high school in the area
from a decline in the school-age
resident population: and sanita-
tion problems. Stohe's nonob-
structionist approach could be of
great value to the stadium project.
when one considers the multi-
million dollar costs from delays
caused by opposition to similar
projects ~n numerous other cities.
The city and state would be well-
advised to be responsive to the
council's concerns.
The Orioles. as represented by
their vice president. Lawrence
Lucchino. also favor downtown
for a stadium location. In the spir-
it of baseball tradition. says Luc-
chino. the game is intended to be
played after work. and. therefore.
ns appropriate venue is down-
town. He reminded the audience
of the popularity of teams in
other downtown facilities such as
Boston's Fenway Park. Detrott's
Tiger Stadium. and Cincinnati's
Riverfront Stadium. Only 15 per-
cent of Orioles fans purchase tick-
ets in advance. A downtown loca-
tion facilitates "walk-up" business.
the Orioles's bread and butter. It
also will attract tourists to games.
The Orioles prefer a single-
purpose stadium. which provides
better service for the team. better
sight lines for baseball. and
"personality" architecture for the
sport.
Not all stadiums achieve the ex-
pectations of their owners. The
experiences of various downtown
stadiums clarifv some of the devel-
opment issues. Among the lessons
one max' draw from the examples
of Cincinnati. New Orleans. and
Indianapolis are the following:
CBD parking facilities can be an
important element in a stadium's
feasibility. Conversely. parking
provided on a close-in stadium
site can support the office market
in a downtown with parking ton-
straints. A baseball team plays
many home games a year. These
attract enough'local residents to
suppon downtown restaurants
and retail sales. Out-of-town fans
can support hotel markets. A
downtown Location is a kev deter-
minant of the stadium's overall
impact on the downtown econo-
my. And finally. a stadium's meth-
od of financing often determines
how favorably the cost/benefit
equation works out. ·
David C. Petersen is the Director of
the Sports & Convention Facilities
Advisory Group for Price
Waterhouse. He has written a book
on the development of convention
centers, stadiums, and arenas
published by ULI.
_TIT-.'r~7,5,' 7_~.7.5,_'5 / September 88 2S
Economic and Tax Benefits
Created by Congress Centers:
Needs and Methods for Measurement
Prepared for
Conl~res des Congres
by
Price Waterhouse Congress Center Group
2 December 1992
Paris, France
Economic benefits generated by attenclees to eong=~ events hav~ been reeog~ged by loeal,
provincial and national' governments f~r several decades. The eonferenee eontera and exhibition
halls which began. as private enterprise/for-profit ventures, eventually hoesme publicly owned
and heavily subsidized as cities competed against each other by offering below-nmrket rents and
other eoncessiotm.
Congress center attendees include:
Delegates and mm of trade or pmfeuional associations and accompanying pemns
Association management
Exhibitera
Exhibition service eontraetora
Others nttraeted by congress events - media, related activities, meetings in city
The total return or profit from this public investment and operating subsidy is seldom measured
because the traditional accounting systems measure only the internal eesh flow of the eongress
center.
Economic benefits, or external revenues, are received by the eommunity in the form of:
· Added jobs and payrolls
· New sales
· Increased taxes
It is .indeed a great mystery how govcssua~ssts make rational decisions to build, operate, expand,
improve or promote their eo~ center when they ate unable to measure the results of their
investments]
What are the most taxable benefits we can measure? Certainly these would include
expenditute. s made by eongess attendees before, during and after the eongess event (pre- and
post-congress touring), costs of/expenditures for exhibit move in/set up and tear down/move out,
event show days and sales by '~ocal" goods and service providera generated by the trade show or
conference. Diagrammatically, the sotwzes of the expenditures during the event period could be
shown:
Tvlm ld Expenditure
Attendee and 'aecoml~_nylag permr
Exhibiton
Assoolation~how MIe-egL-I--I
(on site)
Exhibition Service Contram
(stand erectors)
Media/Related Events, Etc.
Pre-/Poe-Evem
X
X
Similarly, we can identify the major type of expenditux~s.
Evmtt PeriOd
Mm In/Old Set-up/Tear Down
Cold/Show
X
X
X
X
X
These include hotel-related
expenditures; mores, restaurants, hospitality suites and related events (meetings, bw. quets, et~.);
restaurants outside the hotel and ~etail shops. These sales at hotels, retail shol~ and mtaurants
comprise 87% of the total expenditures generated by a congress.
Com&:l:on, rrrade Show Odegate f peneltLr,ll - 1991
3.9~
Loci Tfare;xxtation 4.3%
Real Shim 8.2%
5,2%
Other Fillmills 11.4%
Hold Fiemamas 11.0%
2
How go Measure These Revenues: Mahodolofy
The economic benefit analysis or methodology can be. described in four tasks.
I. Defining the Area or "Universe" of Impact: Who Benefits? Where Does the Spending
Occur?
II.
IH.
Attendee Spending Survey: Measm'ing Direct Sales and Incom~
Spending by Non-attendees: Measurin~ Indirect or Induced Sales and Income
Estimatin~ Accuracy of Analysis: Credibility and Reliabih'ty
Each of these tasks will be described to explain how the benefits or "external revenues"
generated by the congx?.ss center can be measured.
/.
Defining ghe Area or "Univene" of Impa~' Who Bernflu? Where Does ghe
Spending Occur?
Defining the beneficiary may seem simplistic or self-evident, however, many economic benefit
studies are conducted without a clear definition or description of the area or persons receiving
the benefits of the congt~__s center's operation. Normally this area is determined by identifying
the jurisdiction which is paying the eosts or sul~idy of the center. Naturally, if the purpose of
the study is to determine the total return on investment, then the benefits should include the
revenues created for or within the jurisdiction which is paying the costs: city, province or state.
Identification of the area or universe of economic impact will, in turn, define who is "resident"
and "non-resident" and the magnitude of indirect or induced benefits, sometimes referred to as
the "multiplier effect." There are compelling reasons for including other areas in the analysis, in
addition to the jurisdiction of the facility owner. For example, many centers in the United States
have obtained financial support from a larger jurisdiction, such as the state, after it was
demonstrated the state received comparable, or more often, much larger tax revenues from
congres center events than the jurisdiction paying for the operations of the eongx-ess center.
Consequently, some studies include economic benefits for city and state (especially for states
which have only one major city, such as Georgia, Massachusetts, Illinois and others).
3
II. Attendee Spending Survey: Measuring Dirs:s Salss and Iru:om~
The International Association of Convention and Visitor Bureaus (IACVB) has developed the
most widely used data for measurin~ delegate spending in North America. Their procedure
includes:
Selection of a representative range or cross-section of cities
Identification'of "typical"' convention evens for ceeh center
Use of stan~ qllestions to cellcot spending information for eaoh major ea~ of
attendee ...
m
Delegate and aceompsaying persons
Exhibitor
Exhibition service contractor
On-site association or show management
Working in cooperation with association sad show managers as well as facility managers,
each 8roup is surveyed and appropriate call-back procedures are followed to msxlml-e
the response rate
Data collected is then tabulated to show total spending by day and by event, the average
lenS~h of stay, expenditures by type of event and type of expenditure
There is not a "scientific approach" or sophisticated methodology for this exercise._ The basis for
selection of cities and events may be questioned as regards their "representativehess," however,
this is the best information available. The more representative the cross-section of cities and
events sampled and the higher the response ram, the more statistically reliable the results will
be.
4
INSTRUCTIONS:
Please ampaim I)ue~f~.n~ 1 through 7 by dthor ebNking the liplkOik~ill box(B) or wdUng the amor in the
space provided. Round all dollar iJkplndP_ res to file nearest dollar and mar I '0' for andl netegofy whore them
were no expenditem.
1. Did yoe trmml to this eonvant~oll alone? YES NO
If no, indicate the number of people you traveiM with, :_Jlud:ng yoululL
Family/Friends Bailme JJllo(iatel
OO0
001
OO~
003
004
2. Do you redde within the U.S.?
YES NO
If YES, ladleale which state
What was IM paltory mode ot Iranzpoftmmn ufad by yov and lIE ...B,_.Mf8 ot your Irevei parly Io lhi~
conk&.Eon? Check one 'mode.
· t mrtm (web urr/rlt])
~' Train eel
3 Be ON
4 Palyam eorAmek/~a:maUo~al vddele
5 OtMf
Ha many nigids dM you and lIE ramIres of your, Irmml party reamin lIE ally whom this convL. Uon was -
held?
Indicate bldow lhe Iotal amount yov and rambee el your Ixlmonel Irmmi party spent on lie Iolkrddng
item while in lie ally ere lie nenvanlm m bald. Do nix indnde banapodalion Io and from rite
convanUoa ally or eoal&.l~on raglil&i[H lanL (DO nol include bmbeu
Hold room and leldanlab
Hold rettaumnls
OIMr retmoram
Hoqdailly abe
AdmMion lees at altraclions/mumanm
Thmea/wmpmleenolm
Reer, eil~onel anlMIim (gmmm tnet, etc.)
SIC:.::eelng
HiM elm
S~m even~
Tax~iui mmaVote led ban~llta
6u and ado :e~ce
o.
m
11o
111
118
114
11s
11.
117
118
11l
in
1~1
5
This is what the results look like.
Convention Delegate
Trade Show Delegate
Dmgae Expendimres
Exhibtm Expenditure
8pending (~v,w, kiwd per
Delegate Day - 1991
151.94
15.94
167.88
151.94
15.94
80.37
5.60
Baldan ol DdegMe EvTplinditmM
Hole Room and Incidentals 77.23
Hole Restaurants 16.65
Other Restaurants 17.31
Hospitality Suites 7.87
Entertainment 7.88
Refail Sto~es 12.43
Local Transportalic, n 6.56
Other 6.01
TOTAL 151.94
If one of your cities was selected to be part d the survey or if you conducted your own survey,
you would then have recent data about your center. However, if you are using IACVB
'avera{]es,' or data prepared for some other center, to measure economic benefits f~}r your center,
certain adjustments or corrections must be made.
Cost Index, Within North Amerien, the Corporate Travel Index is used to equate the
city/center expenditures being measured to the "average" for the eight cities in the
IACVB survey. This index is prepared for 1 O0 cities and roeash hotel room emits,.
restaurant meals end other travel related emits. Intentional cities travel emits are
measured end "indexed*' using the U.S. State Department Travel Per Diem Allowances for
732 cities.
6
Mm Per
Loution Dim RIll
Birmingham 220
London 236
New York City 151
Nice 172
Osnabrueck 130
Paris 226
Rome 263
Tokyo 290
lnfiatiom The surveys conducted by IACVB are conducted every three to five years.
Adjustments utillsin6 the conauner price index would be necesmuy for any estimate
since the data are over one year old before the survey is ever published.
Currency Conversiom Centers located outside countries Where surveys are taken my
utilize this data if currency conversion is made for the appropriate (usually mid year or
ave~ for the year).
Ratio of Non-resident Attendms Major e~ centers located in '*world capitol
cities*' CLondon, Paris, Berlin, etc.) will attract more non-resident attenclees than a
smaller, provincial city. Non-residents are defined as attendees who reside outside the
region that benefits from eemunie impact. Resident spending-should net be ineluded in
estimates of congress eenter benefits bocause it is mumed a resident would spend this
money somewhere else in the local economy ff he/she did not attend the ~ eYent.
This point my be argued over the residents' propensity to attend a emtgress outside the
jurisdietion if the local event were not betd. However, in nearly all situations, the
economists will recognize the eongress event changes neither the residents'disposable
income nor their propetmity to spend.
Ratio of Oeempied Hotel Room to Atteprims Mat events have a good record of
the number of rooms occupied relative to their attencln,tce. These ratios should be used
for each apeeric event rother than using an "average" ratio for all events. Consider room
night pick-up repo~s, understanding that a certain percentage of attendecru book outside
the room block, as well as statistics from show ~.
Average Length of Says This is identical to the pr~ issue. Each event has its
own length of show and move in/move out requirements. These humben should be used
for each event in the survey to derive the average for the destination or eenter rather
than using an average for the industry.
7
Retail and Restaurant Demity Adjummentt The multitude of unique specialty shops,
high-fashion retail stores and gourmet restaurants available in cities like Paris or New
York encourages congress attendees to plan shopping trip and really "research" which
rutaurants they will enjoy during their amy. Family members and friends ate more
likely to accompany delegates to the congress destination if they expect extmordinax7
shopping and dining opportunities and attractions. Expenditur~ per delegate is much
higher in these cities than in cities with few (or no) retail shopping districts or high
quality restaurants convenient to the delegates. For e-,,,nl}le, average retail expenditur~
for delegates to City A are S48 compared to average retail expenditures of S 120 per
delegate attending a con~'ess in City B. This is also irdlueneed by the affluence of the
attendees, for example attenrlees to a medical conference as compared m a teaeher's
conference. Although there is no index for availability or eoneentrations of Free
which enjoy an extmo~inary zz-'lmstation for either end of the speemun: excellent to
poor, high or low. Granted, such an adjustment could not be very precise. Nevertheless,
using "average" expenditures in extraordinary destinations would lead m a larger error of
over- or under-estimating spending.
After these correctiota are completed, the avera~ expenditure per delegate or attendee my be
substantially higher or lower than the averaBe calculated by the IACVB for the cities
participating in the st recent survey.
IlL Memuring In&a:d or Indireu Rwsma: Spmding by Nma-otmad, s~
Each purchase by the emtSzeu attendee tct~csea~ts a sale by the hotel, restaurant or retail shop
owner. The proeeechs frotn each sale are respent for merchandise, payrolls or services required
to sustain the business. These second and subsequent rounds of indirect or induced spending
would not occur if the tirst expenditure or direct spending was not made by the e0ngress center
attendee. The numtx~r of spendinf~ rounds, or numkx~r of times each purchase-sale is respent in
the "local" economy, before it "leaks out," is usually determined by the size and diversity of the
economy. C, enerally speaking, a nation or region would have n higher number of spending
rounds than a snudl city. The average nund0er of total spending rounds for each economic unit
is referred to as the multiplier. In North America, for example, multipliers range from as small
as 1.2 for a fund county to 4.1 for Los Angeles and 14.4 for the entire U.S.A. The direct
spending should be expanded by the appropriate multiprier for its economic area or "universe."
It can now be understood why a larger area generates a larger multiplier, thereby creating a
larger benefit. At the same time, the larSer area or economic universe is more likely to include
a higher percentaBe of residents, thereby reducing the size of the benefit.
Estimates of the appropriate multiplier may be derived from econometric or input-output models
prepared specifically for a certain geographic area or, if estimates have not been prepared for
your area, by relying on multipliers prepared for other areas which may have similar size and
economic characteristics (as your own area). These calculations or econometric models are
usually produced by economic development or planning agencies or universities under contract
to local, state or national governments.
8
The accuracy or precision of the multiplier my be disputed. However, it would be very
misleading not to include By amplification of the direct .pendi~ and thereby igntwe the
certain impact of induced or indirect spending which does occur and is just as dependent on the
congress attendee as the direct spemding.
The economic benefit or external revenues generated by the eonlFess' center may be determined
by multiplying the number of non-resident -,ten, lee~_ to etmgtesam (without exhibits) times the
aversfie expenditm per delegate (for the particular destination) times the multiplier. Revenues
generated by non-resident artentices to trade shows and ~ with exhibits are calculated
in a similar fashion, only usin~ a different, mtw. h hiSher, avera~,e expenditu~ per
deleffate/attendee. (This hiSher ~Sure would include e~rli~ ~ I~ persons
associated with the exhibition.) Similar calculations can be performed to determine speci~c
(disaggregated) expwAitun~ for ~ ~csmm-.,ts and hotels. This faStare may then be utilized
to calculate taxes and employment/jobs created by the congress center utilizing the appropriate
tax rates and employment:sales mties, ~c~tx. etivcly.
IV. Estimazing th~ Accurucy of tt~ Analysis: Credibility amt Rel;,,bitity
The methedololD' described above my be mm, e or less precise dependin~ upon the availability
of event-speei/ie data as ooa,patc~ to data ob~-Ined fer some other event, at some other
destination, during some other period. The accuracy will aim depend greatly on the statistical
reliability (sampling teehniclues) of the sm-vey exercise. Wege the eventi/attendees seleeted for
the survey representative of all the congress evenu that year? Were they a complete emas-
section and were the results for eaeh.~-oup weighted to reflect the mix of business in ternm of
income eharaeteristies of -ttenclee~ (doeton va. teaehen), length of say, percent of non-resident
attendees, persons per attendee, hotel tooms eceupied pet attendee, etc.
The methodoloEy must be recoSnized as a logical, reasonable basis for estimating the external
revenues generated. If the estimate is represented as bein~ based on a 100~ survey, employin~
a precise multiplier and ineluding a census of employment (before and after the event!) it will
be subject to skeptieisra, at best, and mo~ likely rejection.
As with any estimate, the exercise can be no more accurate than the least accurate input,
weiF, hted by its relative importance. For example, since the total benefit is based on use of the
multiplier, if it is generally accepted the multiplier is accurate + 20%, then estimates of
external revenues should be expressed as a range of ± 20% (and with the relevant number of
significant digits!).
The accuracy of the estimate of external revenues will never be comparable to the traditional
accounting teehniclues employed to compute internal cash flow. Therefore, a candid and
objective recognition of all opportunities to over-estimate or under-estimate the "net profit"
should be addressed.
These should include all revenues and expenses. Although it my not be practical or necessary
to quantify each of these '~line items" they my be acknowledged in the report to reflect the
9
recognition of their existence and relative importance. F.~smples of non-quantitled beneths or
revenues would include:
Business reloeations stimulated by a congress attendee's "discovery" of an area's
advantages as a result of attending a congress
Pre- and print-event tourism generated by congreat attendee~
Technological advaneements/teehnolo~ transfer
Produe~ exports g,~.nenuzd by exhibim to disphy/d,~ntkm
·
Examples of non-quantified expemses or e~m would include:
· Costs for public services associated with event (Ix>lice security, waste removal, etc.)
· Displacement or other business lest beeause eongress attentiees' oeeupaney turned away
other visitors
· Existing excess capacity in retail shops or otlr, r business which my mean that increased
activity due to conStess center activities will not result in new employment.
&:roman: Conci,--ion
Congress centers are developed and operated with public funds to gainrate Iznefits to the local
economy. Few eenten, however, routinely measure these benefits. The measurement is quite
straightforward. We only need to follow some logical guidelines.
DeFine carefully the area of impset or bene~L
Include all non-residents assoeiated with the event. Non-residents live outside the
benefit area.
10
If you do not conduct your own delegate survey, adjust estimates of attendee spending
per day ~at another center) for.'
- Length of stay (event and pr~-/post-travel)
- Local travel cost index
- Local curvzncy
- Inflation
-- Ratio of delegates to persons in party
Estimate the "number of spending rounds" or multiplier for the economic benefit area to
calculate dir~t and indirect spendin~ ~enerated.
Determine the degree d accuracy of your estimates and explain in your report.
Following these simple guidelines will provide your owners, sponsors and beneficiaries a reliable
understanding of the economic and financial benefit of your congress center.
Pric~ W~use Conlreu Ceruer Croup
The Price Waterhouse Congress Center Croup is devoted exclusively to the ~eonomie
analysis d public assembly facility development and operations, including:
Market Demand and Utilization Studies ·
Development Strategies and Planning ·
Management Operations and Analysis ·
Financing and Funding Plans
Expansion ~ and Building Programs
Site Evaluation and Ranking
For further information, contact David C. Petersen, Price Waterha, P.O. Box 2640, Tampa, FL
33601 (Tel: 813/222-5406, Fax: 813/222-7116).
11
Confessions of a "Feasibility Study" Consultant
(How Big is My Business?)
By David C. Petersen
Economic consulting is a business
and it detiniely is cou,p~lillve. From
time to time, univenities, ~ovemment
agencies or not-for-profit orBanizatiens
may conduct s fessibih'ty study. This is
increasingly a ram occurnnce. I would
es~tepe~i~psmo~eth~n99pecentof
private, for-profit businesses.
AU ente~mes, if ~ survive, have
a busme~ pILn. Wl%.thE this pILn is
explicit "in WTitmg" O~ implicitly "un-
denrood," it will include t~e toLlowing
elements:
Define product o~ sevice
Estm~te mmd2e~ o~ pol~t~/
pmvidL, tg this pnx~uct or
or product
De~Lne how you~ p~xtuct o~
product or se~ic~
provided by other comp~i..es
Prepare ~ pm torm~ budget
My first expenen~ in economic
consulting began in 1967 in New York
City. Over the past 25 years, I've been
employed in this business which has
been described by various name:
contract research, municipal financial
estate economic planning services and,
at this stage in my career, sports and
convention facilities advisory services.
ciescribed, ithssbeen2~ysusof
"feasibility studies." And dozens of
business plans, prospective and ex post
facto. Believe me, they all include the
same eight elemems.
FACILITY MANAGER JULY - SEPTEMBER 1993
Define Product or Service
There sr~ s~veral ways to d~-sne the
brochures snd read how they describe
their services.
Locaecopies~f/ssibilitystudiein
the library o~ a univemt3es school of
urbsn plsnnm8, landscape srchiectuxe
or a dry planning dep&,taent.
Conduct a telephone survey of dry
developers, andaskthemwhatm-
firms to help them plan ma~or project~
Acombinationoftheseso~c~wiil
providea balsnced view of the economic
and Financial planning services provided
bycorsulfin~fu'ms. Abssic listofthe
services my finn provides to current or
pr~'pe,.five owners of stadiums, arenas,
conven~n cenm's or amphitheaers in-
dudes:
Market demand and Lllili-:~tiOtl
studies
Estimate operating revenues and
expenses
Expansion planning and building
programs
Development strategies and plan-
Site evaluation and ranking
Management plans and operations
Facility. valuations
Financing and funding plans
Acquisition "due diligence"
Estimate Number o~ Potential Clients
This estimate is directly related to
the next two topics: how many compa-
nies provide this service (and how big is
their staff), and what is the market price
for their service? Let's assume we can-
amphitheaters, convention cenen and
civic centers. Let's further assume this
inventory comprised about 1,500 facili-
ties. Next, our survey revealed 10 per-
cett, or 150, whosaid ttmycommimamd
astudywithintheputtwdvemonthsior
an average cmt of S30J300.' This number
should suggest how msny profr '.'2~1
studies times $30~0, and we assume
is required for saisris (*t sn avenge of
approximately 60 ~ staff to be
employed.
If our analy~s of sll the c~mpetitive
DetennineifDemandbGmwin~or
Shrinking
referred to as public aeemb~ fa~ities,
and found both the number of these fa-
cilities and the pmpensit~ of the own-
ets to hire consultin8 rums to estimae
not dedinin8. We rosy ws~lt to be in this
business.
Determine Market Share
A favorite new word is "niche.
lately, the word is often used in its eco-
loSical sense - "the area within a habitat
occupied by an orBsnits" (hesum,bly,
no two orBanisms can oc~upy the same
niche at the ~ time.) The question
becomes, "Are there, witin this (eli-
tem) forwhichwemaybeuniquelysuited
o~ spec~iy adapted?" The amwe~, as it
tums out, isyes. Now we'H~othtouBha
berofpotentia]dienlawhichaxelmtor
dimmated at each sta~e in the selection
Feasibility
Can We Differentiate Out Service
(Offer a Better Motmeitap)?
If I may digress a little. Ove~ the
a~orementioned 25 yeu span, Fve heard
a lot of the same questions repeated:
There are several companies Like
yours. Don't you all do pretty
much the same thing?
13o you ever tell a client their project
won't work" (rye never seen a
feasiliW study with a negative
conclusion.)
If your report can't be used to obtain
financing, why does anyone
ever hire you?
With all your travel on airplanes,
don't you get claustrophobic?
Didn't your ex-wives olc~ct to aH
that travel?
You must travel to a lot of interesemg
places. (Asked in Sioux Falls,
SD)
And the answer is no, we don't all do
the same thing. At least we don't do it the
same way, and many of us will not be
considered for the same assignment.
Hopefully, the issue of product differen-
tiation will become clearer m the discus-
sion of the next topic.
Begin - Quantify the Universe
Even though there may be approxi-
mately 200 facilities built, proposed, ex-
panded or purchased each year, only 150
owners or prospective owners commis-
sioned a feasibility or valuation study.
Therefore, the market universe is 150.
Identify Budget Limits 430)
Some clients can only spend a lim-
ited sum appmved or budgeted for "the
study." Someone will do the study for
that sum. If our tirm/group cannot pro-
vide the service for that fee, we're out of
this market. Some firms will "cut the suit
to fit the cloth." ff they believe ten inde-
pendent anal.vtical ta/ks are required for
the most reliable estimates, and the client
has budgeted only $17,000, they'll get the
phone survey. A prudent manner will
not rely on only one .type of navigational
aid or method. Our universe of opportu-
nities is now reduced to 120.
FACILITY MANAGER JULY-SEPTEMBER 1993
Geographical Hirin8 Requirements
(35)
ff our finn is required to have an
office in the client's city and we don't,
we're out. Now we have only 85 poten-
tial or "candidate" clients this year.
Fu~n or Individual Conflict (25)
ffourfh-mrepresentsanotherdient
with interest that my be peiceived as
competitive with the prospective client,
we should not propose. Even if it is not
a legal conilia o~ mtenst, perceptions
to60.
ClientExpectation(20)
Many clients (m. ore than we may
want to know) expect the consultant to
estimae a favorable or acceptable level
dusaSe,~napelslpertm"ntanceor~scal
wfilhixeacomultanttoaffirm thesize
facility they have planned, on the sire
they have selected, with the booking
aBement team the~ have identified, etc.,
etc. R is not as elsy ~ot the consuJtant to
discover clients with tiese expectations
as it is fot the potential cilent to discovet
thecansultant's~tos~nntheit
plan. If the consultant does not believe
their planned facility is optimally sized,
located or profitable, and the client has
already reserved the date for the grand
opening, then the consultant should:
Not prepare a proposal
Not attend the bidden' information
meeting.
Not uncletake extensive reconruti~
sance work.
Not prepare ~or and travel to and
present his/her team at the in-
Not disclose to anyone the (m~e)
~ for buillrlg tO teSpO!ld,
travel to or interview for this
Thisisamaiorhard(ffnot~-~
major hazard) for the camcjentious
sultanLFaiungt0meetthedient'sexpec-
tations for. study caadusians mulls in
nario. Theclient:willnotwanttopayyou
or threaten to sue; will give you a bad
ref~ence;willttytodisaedityoutmeth-
odok~;willetdtavorm~tyour
firm in thelocalarm. ltwould be betm'
for this co~.sultsnt if halite had revet
the client csm sense the consultant~s pre-
ai~0meion to independence without the
antwillonlyb3setheinvestmentinthesir
etc..~ few thousand dolhr~
By ~ Point in the ~ plan
precess, we have discevex~l thereal size
50 percent "kit rate," weql do 20. At
$30~00 averaBe fee per smdy, that's
to support a sts~ o~ about eiSht ~
Ascan be seen by now, the ability to
survive in this bumnme or pro _f,_,.;e_d__'___'_orml
practice roll deped upon accurate de-
terrainalton of several key vadablas -
latBemeasuteofhardwodcbaSOper-
ce~t hit rate realistic? How ma~y clots
with very spec~c exlnctations ~ the
consultant fail to identity? Marketing
consume a 10 percent planned profit
margin very quicldy. Fallin8 to under-
takesuftclentrecora,-i ,,.ees~theback-
lead to cetaln fallum, even ff the consult-
The budget wll] include estimatas of
Cotsuiting has become more capital
phones, etc.? The old definilion of an
expert was a person with a brie ~
more than 150 miles from home. /
that person needs several dozen printed
ers and CRTs.
Feasibility
How BiB is This BusimP
ff this ~ h~ $t,'ved any
P~,Ihopeitl~shelpedtoexpL~n:
The real market may be 20 percent of
the umverst
We may need a $0 percent capture
rate to survive. (If we knew the
rec~zired succem rate or win-
loss l:~ramtm~e, mid we're risk
averse, we nuychomeanother
career.)
There is amuchsmsihn. mark~niche
~or delivem~ a quality sem~
ing~exibbcxmclusionsatalow
pnce.
One'thing iscex~ain. Over the past 25
years, the need for r~lisble snd honest
economic snsJysis is B~sts todsy than
it has ever been. Development snd opa-
al~g costs for public sssembly hcilities
are relatively highez and there is less
abili~ for local governments snd team
owners to pay for them.
·
Dared C. Petersen is managing director of
the Price Wate~msse Sports rind Conven-
tion Facilities AdvLsorsj Group. He is the
author of Convention Centers, Stadiums
and Arenas, ~mblished lnJ tkt Urhm Land
Institute.
FACILITY MANAGER JULY-SEFTEMBER 1993
O
1994 Am,m tEA :n ANNUAL R Pon
Volume 1 Copyright s}1994.
INTRODUCTION
SURVEY RESPONSES
The Price Waterhouse Entertainment Facilities Advisory
Gwup is pleased to report the results d our annual survey
d amphitheater facilities. This report includes survey
responses from major amphitheaters throughout the United
States. We would like to acknowledge the efforts d amphi-
theater managers and staff for their participation. This
being the first year d our amphitheater survey, we plan to
publish annually a report that can be relied upon as a
useful management tool to assist amphitheater mana~rs
analyze and manage their specific venue.
Survey forms were sent to managers d all major amphithe-
aters in the United States. Information from over fifteen
amphitheaters was obtained and used in compiling the
report statistics. Each manager responding to the survey
was provided with a confidential report comparing his or
her venue to the average and range for all amphitheaters.
The information gathered for this report addresses the
following topics:
· Seating and Parking Capacities
· Utilization
· Attendance
· Tieket Prices
· Concession and Novelty Per Capitas
· Parking
· Operating Expenses
· "guestion of the Year"
· Amphitheater Growth
1994 Amph/~heam- Anmm/P,~pon I '-
SEATING AND PARKING
CAPACITIES
Amphitheauus vary signifieandy in both total seating and
the mix of fixed seating versus lawn seating. The average
amphitheawx tspondi~ go our survey had a total seatins
~pacity of 15,700, ~mprised of approximately 48 pe~ent
fixed seats and 52 percent lawn seats.
In addition, the average amphitheater has approximately
5,700 parking. spaces, or one space for every three seas
within the facility. The seating and parking capacities for
the amphitheaters included in our study arc shown in
Table 1.
UTILIZATION
TABLE1
SEA~NGAND PAR~NGCAPACI~ES
Ave M~N MAX
Seating Capacity
- Total. 15,700 8,700 22,500
- Fixed 7,500 2,700 18,000
- Lawn 8,200 0 15,500
Parking Capacity 5,700 3,000 10,000
Regarding the adequacy of the number of fixed seats in
their venues, 50 percent d amphitheater managers were
satisfied with the number of fixed seats in their veaue ·
while 50 percent would like additional fixed seating. ~
Managers of amphitheaters with less than 7,500 fixed seats
desire additional fixed seating while those. managers whose
venues have at least 7,500 fixed seats are satisfied with the
number of fixed seats.
In general, reeendy built amphitheaters have total seating
capacities in excess of 15,700 with fixed seats and lawn
seats comprising approximately 40 and 60 percent, rcspee-
tively, of total seating capacity. In addition, many newer
amphitheaters have approximately 30-35 luxury suites with
4-6 seats per suite.
Amphitheater utilization is comprised primarily of concert
events. Only two amphitheaters responding to our survey
hosted symphonies in addition to concerts. Table:2 sum-
marizes the number d pedormanees and average actual
attendance per performance for eoncerts and symphonies.
TABIX 2
UTILIZATION
Ave MIN MAX
Performances
- Concerts 34 16 71
Symphonies ~ 13 4 21
Attendance per Performance
Cons 8,700 4,600 13,600
Symphonies z 6,500 3,100 10,000
1 Aver~es beJude .din only from amphitheaters that hosted symphonies.
ATTENDANCE
Attendance at amphitheater evens varies both in total
attsradanee and the proportion of patrons who purchase
tickets venus patrons who reeeive "complimentary" tickets.
For concerts and symphonies, the number of "no-shows,.
people who purchase tickets to an event but do not attend
the event, am difficult to quantify due to complimentary
tioket give-aways, oorporate sponsorship and other ptomo-
tiomd efforts designed to promote event awareness. For all
but one of the amphitheater rcspondents, actual attendance
exceeded paid attenclanee. Table 3 presents attendanee
clata~
TABLE 3
ANNUAL ATTENDANCE
AVG MIN MAX
Total Paid Attendance
Concern 262,000 68,000 506,000
- Symphonies ~ 81,000 8,500 154,000.
Total Actual Attendance
- Concerts 296,000 78,000 557,000
- Symphonies ~ lll,000 . 12,000 210,000
Paid to Actual Percentage
- Concerts 89% 87% 101%
Symphonies z 73% 71% 73%
1 Averages include dam only from amphitheaters that hosted symphonies.
1994 Amphitheater Annual l~n 3
TICKET PRICES
To provide amphitheater managers with a measurement by
which they could evaluate their ticket price levels, ~ross
ticket price information was obtained for concerts and
symphonies as well as the average tax on tickets. This
information is summarized in Table 4.
TABLE 4
TICKEr PRICES IN 1993 DOLLARS
AvG MIN MAX
Concerts $18.25 S12.85 $24.70
Symphonies $20.55 $14.05 $27.05
Average Tax on Tickets 3% 0% 10%
Approximately 50 percent of the participating amphithe-
aters had some form of tax on tickets.
CONCESSION'AND
NOVELTY PER CAPITAS
In recent years, amphitheater operators have recognized the
growing importance d concessions and novelty sales reve-
nue. This has led to changes in both the design and range
d concession and novelty products. A summary of Foss
concession and novelty sales per capitas for concerts and
symphonies is presented in Table 5.
TABLE 5
GROSS CONCESSION & NOVELTY SALES PER CAP~A
IN 1993 DOLLARS
Ave MIN MAX
Concessions
- Concerts $4.55 $1.50 $6.45
- Symphonies $0.45 $0.00 $0.85
Novelties
Concerts $3.20 31.35 $4.90
Symphonies $O.00 $0.00 $0.00
Concession and novelty sales per capita were significantly
higher at newer amphitheaters than at older venues. This
can be attributed to the newer amphitheaters having up-
scale concession'items, increased number of merchandisin$
points and brand name [ood Outlets-
4 199~ Amp/ddmmr ~ Repm ~'~
C
PARKING
OPERATING EXPENSES
1994 Amphitheater Anmud Report
The parking fee for concerts at the majority d
amphitheaters is approximately $4.00 per car.
Amphitheaters hosting symphonies do not charge a parking
fee to attend symphony performances. As noted earlier, the
average amphitheater has dppwximately 5,700 parking
spaces. Based on an average actual attendance figure of
8,700 patrons for concerts and three patrons per car, the
average amphitheater uses approximately 3,000 parking
spaces per concert. Table 6 presents parking fees and
parking revenue per. capitas for concerts.
TABLE 6
PARKING DATA IN 1993 DOLLARS
Parking Fee per Car
Parking Revenue per Capita
ArC MtN MAX
$3.75 $2.50 $10.00
$1.30 $0.00 $2.65
To provide amphitheater managers with data by which they
could analyze their operating co~ts, we obtained operating
expense data including talent fees, event advertising and
promotions, salaries and wage~, utilities, maintenance and
supplies, insurance and other expenses. Total operating .
expenses for the average amphitheater, including and
excluding talent fees, respectively, was approximately 34.7
and $1.7 million. Table 7 provides a breakdown of
amphitheater operating expenses, excluding talent fees.
TABLE 7
OPERATING EXPENSES IN 1993 DOLLARS
(THOUSANDS)
% OF
AvG TOTAL MIN MAX
Event Adv./Promo. S 547 32% $ 20 $1,584
Sal., Wages & Benefits 519 -31 80 1,300
Utilities 58 3 6 94
Maint. &Supplies 93 6 25 243
Insurance 89 5 37 284
Other 378 23 0 '1,368
Total $1.684. 1,_,00~ $168 '~4~873
QUESTION
OF THEYEAR
As pafi of our survey, we included a "Question of the Year"
which asked amphitheater managers: "In the next two
years, do you expect the number of concerts in your facility
to increase, decrease, or remain the same? Explain."
Responses are summarize~bHow.
INCREASE - 12%
CREASE
SAME -
AMPHITHEATER GROWTH
As shown in the chart above, 63 percent of amphitheater
managers anticipate the number of concerts to increase in
their venues. · The majority of amphitheater managers who
expect growth in the number of concerts their facility will
host operate newer amphitheaters or amphitheaters that
have recently been renovated. These managers expect
growth in the number of concerts their venues will host due
to:
· Their vcnuc is relatively new and has begun to build
their reputation and contacts in the industry.
· Their facility has been renovated with greater seating
and parking capacities to host larger acts.
Responses from amphitheater managers anticipating a
decrease or the same level of concert activity expressed
these reasons for their expectations:
· Their facility currently hosts the maximum number of
acts their market can support.
· Their facility is currently hooked for the summer season ~ .
and does not have any available dates to host additional ·
conceitS.
In recent yem,~, there has been a significant increase in the . .' ..~.
number of amphitheaters in the United States. During the past ..
ten years alone, over twenty amphitheaters have been built.
Currendy, there are over 60 amphitheaters in operntion 'during .
a pottim of the calendar year. 'rne rapid increase in the
The prollfeuuicm of outdoor amphitheaters in recent years is
due to th~ ~ in music industry economics as well as the
elmn~ in market damaogra~ia. Today, promoters am
fagling it mm~ 12~ditah~e to develop and operate their own
· fa~ity as ol,ld to mnti~ one. By operating their own
In talmud to changing demographics, many industry analysts
point to a~e grating strength of the baby-boom market. This
Woodstor'.k ~meratiou, wbi_eh was weaned on rock and
has r~ilmmvem:l its alFmity for live music and has begun
attemling outdoor amphitheaters for the live
It is expected'there will be etmtinued grmvth in the numlzr of
amphitheaten with both private and public money being
ut;li,~! to finsnee the development of these faeRities, As
indicated in th~ ~ pie chart, the participating
amphitheaters in our survey have been finnneed thrt.~h a
eombirmtion of public and private money.
PRiVA~ DOLLARS- 38%
PUBHC DOLLARS- 62%
The use of private and public funding to develop
amphitheau~s is expected to ecmtinue due to increased
ecnnpetititm among eoneert prominers and cities to attmet nets
to their facilities and loealities.
1994 Amphitheater Annual Repon 7
ABOUT PRICE
WATERHOUSE'S
ENTERTAINMENT FACII/IIES
ADVISORY GROUP
· MmketDatm~&UulbmimSui~
· IL.l~,...aSuseSismdRsm-
· F. mm~_p_iu~inpillcmmllyrsc~ip/&ve.k~,,,~maqxrsdem
· C-dkw-- !m~a~~mm,~
HockeyLmS~ Prk~W~"skoscfi~y~volved~n,ervinSeve~
I-,' ' ~m=eisfims~mmbjees- - '-'d~wi~pismi~
&v~op.,..amdepemlmdpublicsman~yfr.~i6m.
inrmmtim m indumy unnk md
StaffmmlzemhaveakobemqutsedinperiodicsbmchmtheNewYat
Tenre, Wa!l Sumet Jmxml md WmhinStm Pmt. The Smup's dimcsor
b U~ L~ Im~_
~ ,mr] ~ dd,, Zra.,u.~..,. FacaldmAd,,kxT Cn~ evide~
or in p~n, or /,,r /urd~ i,fr, rmdm er ~ pleme am~ De~ Per,~ Menqing Dimsr . P~ graerlmsm ·
P.a B= 2640, T~np2. ~ 33(J01 (rd,. 8131223-7577 a, Fv... al312~-7008).
:/
A Message from the Chairman:
uali~' is a much used and abused word in todav's business world.
At Price Waterhouse. quality has been our watchword for 100 vears. For us it is qot a slogan:
it is a resolute professional commitment. the key to our cede of client service. Our tradition
of excellence has been built on an unwavering commitment to the highest quality client
service. rendered by profession'As with a strong sense of integrity and dedication to exacting
standards of professional conduct.
Our commitment to qualit)' has been contirmed by our 1990 peer review. I am proud to report
that the 1990 peer review of Price Waterhouse's accounting and auditing practice resulted in
an unqualified opinion and no letter of comment. The peer review report appears on page 3
of this booklet.
Peer reviews of major firms have historically resulted in the issuance of a letter of comment '
recommeqding improvements in the system of quality control. In our profession. a peer
review without a letter of comment--that is. without a letter identi~'ing where improvements
are needed--represents the epitome of quality. This is the tirst time that a peer review of a
major firm concluded with no letter of comment.
II
A.A. binmet, Jr., chairman
ef Ibe Public Oversight
Boanl, cengmtulating Shaun
O'Mdley on the line's 1990
peer review mrs. "This is
In historic occasion. Your
finn should be very proud of
its mmnplbhment," aid
Ill'. Sofn~iero
Without question, a new standard has been set. It is particularly rewarding to have the
quality of our practice and the impressive pedormance of our people acknowledged by our
peers. Yet we recognize the need to intensify our efforts to ensure that we maintain this -
leadership position by complying not only with the pmfession's strict standards but also with
Price Waterhouse's own even more stringent standards.
As evidence of our commitment to provide the highest quality service available in our
profession, we have formulated The Client Bill of Rights. This statement distills the cede of
client service that drives---and inspirc~ Price Waterhouse professionals. It appears on
pages 5.-7 for your review.
We are pleased to receive this x~.~gnition. We pledge to you a continuation of the high
level of quality services you have come to expect from us.
Shaun F. O'Malley
Chairman and Senior Partner
i
Serf-Regulation and the Peer Review
he U.S. public accounting profession instituted in 1978 a thorough
prop'am of serf-regulation designed to monitor, test and, where neeessay, mandate improve-
ments in the quality of accounting and auditing services provided to public companies.
Endorsed by the SEC, the peer re~iew program is one of this nation' s major safelpards to
assure the intelp'ity and credibility of corporate financial reporting. Price Waterhouse has
strongly supported the peer review program from its inception.
Responsibility for the peer review process is vested at sevend different levels of authority:
· The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) originated the ~uidelines
for the peer review program and continues to revise those guidelines as required.
· A peer farm is enSaffed, once every three years, to review the quality of the accounting and
auditing services provided by the finn under review.
· The Public Oversight Board, an independent private-sector body, monitors the conduct of
the peer review and reports its observations and recommendations to the AICPA.
The SEC pedorms its own independent evaluation d the effectiveness d the peer review
process and Board oversight, and has reported to Congress that the peer review process
"should enhance the consistency and quality of praetiee before the Commission."
The Client Bill o! RigMs
Our clients have:
7be dgM to protmional excelle.ce
We will be technically proficient in all areas in which we provide advice. We will stay
current on business and technical developments and seek counsel from appropriate
firm professionals when in doubt about a course of action. We will keep abreast of all
issues affecting our client so that we can anticipate challenges and provide appropriate
advice.
The dgM to be served by prolssei0nab Mm uudmnd timit business
We will learn all we can about our client's industry and business. We will 'get to know
people within the client organization and outside it who have in-depth knowledge of the
client's business, its culture, and its strategic objectives, and we will listen to our client
to understand its needs. Being in the thick of our client's businca: not on the
sidelines--will allow us to identify and anticipate issues of concern to our client.
While others may learn on the job, we will strive to know as much as possible about the
client and its industry before we ever begin working with a client.
The dgM to proactive advice and creative businto ideas
We will take the initiative in proposing actions to enhance our client's success, striving
always to offer the innovative recommendations our client expects from. its business
advisers. We will demonstrate to our client that we expect to be and are qualified to be
among those who are consulted about significant client events at the planning stage.
We will be thought of as the "idea people.'" When asked for creative ways to help our
client achieve its objectives, we will be the firm that says, "Yes, can do...."
i
The rigN to independent viewpoints and pe.,~4?.Uves
We wffi advise our client but actions that are b: its best lone-term interests. AJthough we
WIG keep client objectives c]car]y Lq mind as we aid in decision-making, we WIll not be
sycophants. We wffi have the independence of SpLrjt, the ~, and the confidence to
rl~sco~ the client from pursuing a cotuse of action that we bdjeve to be flJ-advised.
The dgM to-effective communication
We will keep our client contacts informed about the progress of our work and any issues that
require their attention. Our written communication Wi]] be literate and clear, and our oral
communication equally articulate. We will treat our client contacts as professional equals,
extending to them and their staffs the same courtesy and respect we ourselves expect. In
our communications with client executives and staff, we will demonstrate that we are wall-
rounded people that they can relate to on levels other than the professional one; clients like
to do business with people who are interesting and personable, just as we do.
The fight to a wide range of pr01enional ms0umes
We wiU tap the extensive resources of Price Waterhouse to provide our client with the mOst
experienced and savvy business edvice available. We will introduce our colleagues to our
client contacts and, when relevant, involve them in client service planning and delivery. To
promote weU-coordinated services, we will ensure that all appropriate Price Waterhouse
professionals are kept informed about services proposed and provided to a client.
The dgM to dependable sendce
We will never miss a deadline or renege on a commitment. We will do it right the first time
and complete the assignment better and faster than the client expects. We will avoid
surprises about technical and reporting issues, fees, and staff turnover. When we are the
best, we will let the client know; if we do not have the required depth in a particnis~r s. rea,
we will have the confidence to direct the client elsewhere.
i
TIm rtOht to Mrvios an~/tinm anal an~simm
We will always be available to our client, anytime and anyplace we are needed. That means
spending more time in our client's office than in our own, being "on call" for our client at all
times, and keeping in close touch with client contacts when we are not on the premises.
And it means bringing the worldwide resources of the firm to bear on client issues, providing
the services needed across town or across the globe.
The riOlit to state-of-the-art technology
We will take advantage of the vast technological resources the firm has created to benefit
Price Waterhouse professionals and clients. We will use internal tools to enhance the
efficiency and cost-effectiveness of our services. And we will implement Price Waterhouse
proprietary software and customize other products that will help our client attain better
management information and mote effective operations.
The rigM to value-added service
We will always be thinking about how our client can be mete successful and of ways we can
help it achieve its business goals. We will make out client's concerns our concerns a~d put
its needs ahead of our own. We will challenge ourselves and our client, asking the tough
questions, not being afraid to be wrong. We will be ever vigilant in identifying additional
ways we can strengthen our client' s competitive edge, ways in which we can offer even mote
than the client expects.
For aclcfit#onal mformat#on contact a Price Walerl~ouse office conven;ent to you.
(212) 819-5000 FrAMFORD~CI~ 06~0t INOIANA
~te ~
(~1) ~
4~ S~
MENLO
~ Wm~ R~O (
P ~ ~x 1~ Z~D 9~-7~'
~KL~D. ~ ~12-~
455 Ca
S~,te ~ .~ 0 Z,O ~-~75'
1916) 441-2370 ~ y 7~EK, MI e7
(813) ~3-757
SAN DIEGO. CA
Su,te 24~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (616) ~-1~1
1 I t r
(619) 23~ -1~ ~6~3) 287-9~
{4151393-85~ ~ t 11~ i r
SAN JOSE.
t~
2~ 2Bin
Suete 3~
~33
1
9~ Can ~en~. Suite
4
1 1 tl
(~) ~ ~ (314) 42~
{NVER ~ ~2-~72
Suite 2~
(303) 893-81~
628
(203~7-7~
i
LONGISL~ID
~ 11753
100 Jef~N.~Y Quade'ange
(516) 681-7114
New York NY 10036
(212) 944-9750
(315) 474-6571
NORTH CAROLINA
4i0~0~ 28290
(919) 725-0691
OHIO
(513) 222-2100
e~l~te43604
(419) 247-1800
Suite 400
(405) 272-9251
GIF. GON
PORTL&ND, OR 97204
101 S W Mare Street
Sure 1700
(503) 224-9040
imIINdIYINANIA
ee{~ 15219
I IN. AND
4401 ) 421-0501
~te 1200
(803) 779-0930
IINNESIF. E
JOHNSON CIT'~ TN 37601
(6151 929-912~
(901) 52:~8000
NASHVILLE. TN 3/205
4400 Harc~ng ROaO
Su~e 300
{615) 292-5000
TEXAS
(817) 64~1866
AUSTIN. TX 78701
Coner~ Avenue
~ulte 2(300
(512) 476-6700
1700 PaCific Argue
Sude 1400
(214) 922-8040
~{e 300
(214) 386-9922
FORT WORTH. TX 76102
1700 Cmty Cent~ Tower II
1201 L~shlna
Sute 2900
(713) 654-4100
ANTORK:) I'X 78205
(512) 226-1100
UTAH
SALT LAKE CfT~. UT 84111
175 Easl 400 ~th. Sa~e 700
(80) 328-2300
VERMONT
Insurance S~fs
Sude 440
(802) 864-0671
VIRGINIA
(8{Y,) 622-5005
(804) 648-9261
WAIHIM61'ON
4e 2200
(206) 462-6550
WtNCON~N
MILWAUKEE. WI 53202
100 East w;sc~n Arm
Price Watefho,me
PRICE WATERHOUSE FIRM PROFILE
Price Waterhouse formed its Developsea AddsoP/helm Gro.p in 1990 to sewe clients whose primary needs are:
· Credibility and objectivity
· Client service
· Worldwide reputation
Price Waterhouse ensures the continuity of its reputation through its program of recruiting the Best and Brightest. The
results of this program are borne out by objective measures. As noted in · survey published in the trade magazine,
Professional Services Rev/ew, 'a greater percentage of [PW] hires are the top students from the top schools than any other
firm.'
Fortuna 500 executives ware recently asked to rank the B/g 6 accounting firms in various categories. On a scale of 1-10,
survey participants ranked Price Waterhouse highest in ethics; Price Waterhouse's score of 8.5 was the highest individual
firm score in any category.
The firm began its U.S. operations in 1889 and today it employs 10,000 professional and technical staff in 100 offices
throughout the United States. The Price Waterhouse World Firm is located in 111 countries in 448 offices.
Price Waterhouse leads the Fortune 100, Forbes 100 Largest Multin~ionals (29% market share) end Dow Jones Industriais
(47% market share) in number of clients. Regarding combined sales of clients, Price Waterhouse ranks first with $671
billion, representing 26% of total sales among the Forfun· 500. No B/g 6 firm is more stretegicaily focused on end
organized to serve multinational companies than Price Waterhouse.
The firm's achievements for quality work have been recognized by its peers. Several recent developments underscore the
Price Waterhouse quality commitment. In 1990, Price Waterhouse received no recommendations for improvements in the
exhaustive peer review process. This was the first time a major accounting firm received a perfect '0' since the AICPA
established the peer program in 1978.
Among the firm's clients are major multinational firms:
· IBM * Bausch and Lomb
· Hewlett-Packard · Bristol Meyars
· MCI Communications · Alcan Aluminum
· E.I. du Pont de Nemours · Scott Paper
· W.R. Grace · Chevron
· The Walt Disney Company · Amoco
· Shell Oil · Exxon
· F.W. Woolworth · Eastman Kodak
· Goodyear T~re and Rubber · Seagram
The Price Waterhouse Sports and Convention Facilities Advisory Group is devoted exclusively to economic analysis of public
assembly facility development end operations end specializes in:
· Market Demand end Utilization Studies ·
· Development Strategies and Planning *
· Management Operations and Analysis ·
· Financing end Funding Plans ·
Expansion Planning and Building Programs
Site Evaluation and Ranking
Facility Valuations
Acquisition "Due Diligence'
Representative clients of the Sports and Convention Facilities AdvisoW Group include:
· San Diego Convention Center
· Anaheim Convention Center
· Louisiana Superdome
· Jacob Javits Convention Center (New York)
· Georgia World Congress Canter (Atlanta)
· Singapore International Convention and
Exhibition Center
Seattle Convention and Trade Center
Perth Royal Showgrounds (Australia)
Philippine CorNention and V'mitors Bureau
Joe Robbia Stadium
Phoenix 'Suns' Arena
Artahem Arena
Lexington Canter Theater/Opera House
The group's professional support and partidpaticm in the assembly and meeting facilities industry includes:
laternational Congress Center Anneal liepert - Price Waterhouse has been sdected to conduct the
annual survey of member' facilities for an international association of congress centers. This
information is presented by geographical iocation and size of all major centers and includes
attendance, food and beverage sales, occupancy, rental revenue and exhibition space occupancy.
Convention Center Annul Raprot - Price Waterhouse surveys every primary convention center with
over 100,000 square feet of e~hiblt space and approximately 50 smaller facilities throughout the
United States and Canada. We report annual convention and trade show average occupancy,
attendance, food and beverage per capita sales and effective rental rates.
Data Base and Bgildlag Rles- We malntahq currant records on building floor plans, financial data and
city information for many major facilities in North Amedca.
Pr01essi0sal Collemlces aid hellfin - Our staff address fNe tO tan professional associations
annually on subjects associated with planning, development and operation of public assembly
facilities. These groups include the Annual Stadium Managers Seminar, International City Manager
Association's Sports & Events Martagemem Conference, International Association of Auditorium
Managers, International Convention Center Conference, Association Internationale des Palale de
Congres, the Urban Land Institute's Sports Fadlitles Seminar, Japan National Tourira Organization
and others. The active involvement of our staff in the' activities of these organizations keeps us
abreast of industry trends, facility development and related information.
Publications and Researcli - The results of our research and analysis ere frequently pobiished such
journals as Facility Manager; Conferences, Exhibitions & Incentives; Urban Land; Arnusemem
Business; Convene; Practicing Planner and Tradeshow Week. Staff members have also been
quoted in numerous magazines and newspapem such as the New York Times, I/Va/I Street Journg
and Washington Post. David C. Petersen suthored a book, published by the Urban Land Im,litute,
entitled Convention Centers, Stadiums and Arenas.
The actMties and resources of the Sports and Convention Facilities Advisory Group evidence our commitment to improved
spectator sports, entertainment and assembly facility development and operation.